HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: merlin@mits.mdata.fi (Markku M{kel{)
Subject: Linux 0.99 and /etc/rc
Organization: Microdata Oy
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 16:05:27 GMT
Keywords: boot, /etc/rc

I just changed to Linux 0.99 and it doesn't run /etc/rc at
the boot-time, like my previous Linux (0.98pl2) did.
What do I have to do to fix this?

--
--
Markku M{kel{ - merlin@mits.mdata.fi
From: jnelson@plains.NoDak.edu (Jim Nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Annoying Linux developer habits.
Date: 13 Jan 93 03:28:44 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.C0rwBw.Epu
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

In article <1993Jan11.154103.24261@bernina.ethz.ch> almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Werner Almesberger) writes:
>The main advantage of using anything more advanced than ASCII is print
>quality and readability. Anybody who has ever read both the ASCII and the
>LaTeX FAQ will surely agree.

I don't have LaTex, so I cant tell.

>Introductory documentation is typically written in ASCII. That the more
>complete part is written in a decent format isn't a good excuse for not
>reading the READMEs and FAQs :-)

If you can't read it, you can't read it.  I guess I'll just have to live
with the 'introductory documentation' and just stumble along.


-- 
Jim, in the Land of the Lost.            |Disclaimer:  These are probably 
ObQuote: Do Not Meddle in the Affairs of |   opinions.  I'm probably not
          Wizards, For You are Crunchy,  |   supposed to have any.
          and Good with Ketchup.         | Blessed Be!
From: reed@rd08.wg2.waii.com (Michael Reed)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Linux setup Questions
Date: 8 Jan 93 15:41:05 GMT
Reply-To: reed@rd08.wg2.waii.com
Organization: Western Geophysical Research & Development

I have installed Linux from the SLS release on my home 486 and run into
a couple of problems/wierdnesses.

1) My SVGA card uses the Trident 8900C which X386 claims to support.
In fact, X386 recognizes the chip, returns the correct amount of
memory on the board, and gets most of the clocks correctly.  But,
whenever I start up X386, it locks the machine and even CNTL-ALT-BACKSPACE
won't kill the server.  I have to reboot.  Running the mono version
of X386 produces a wierd pattern on the screen which I am able to
change in size by changing the default video mode.  The color version
simply blacks the screen before locking the machine.  Hints, clues,
or fixes would be appreciated.

2) Besides the root, I added one other user to the system.  If I list
the users files as root, it displays the correct ownership.  However,
if log in as the user, a whoami claims that UID 405 is not found, and
the file ownership is shown as 405 not as user reed.  (The entry in
/etc/passwd is correct, but somehow only accessed by the root.)


Other than these two problems, I have to say I am quite impressed by
Linux and very appreciative of all the work that people have put
into it.  

-- 
The above are my own opinions and mine alone.

*****************************************************************************
Dr. Michael Reed,
Western Geophysical, Research and Development Group
reed@rd08.wg2.waii.com
(713) 964-6322                     FAX: (713) 964-6372
*****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: frankenb@gelion.informatik.uni-bonn.de (Fachschaft Informatik)
Subject: lines in X11
Reply-To: frankenb@gelion.informatik.uni-bonn.de
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 14:16:42 GMT

Hello, i have problems with X11:

When i move a window there will still remain a line on the left side of the window
at its old position (but only on every second column).

I have a ET4000-Card with 512kB and on Eizo 9060.

Thank you

  Michael

---
Michael Frankenberg
email: frankenb@gelion.informatik.uni-bonn.de
From: Mark.Mims@f229.n209.z1.fidonet.org (Mark Mims)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Linux & SCO Xenix Drivers
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 22:20:34 -0800

I have a Multiport Serial Interface that has the drivers for the SCO
Xenix operating system.  Since the SCO Xenix is similar to UNIX I was
wondering if the driver would work with Linux?

Mark


 * Origin: Generic Engineering Technical Information System (1:209/229)

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: ramirez@mcclb0.med.nyu.edu
Subject: Distributed Processing
Organization: NYU Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 00:33:23 GMT

Hello all,

	A while back someone posted about a program(s) that allows distributed
processing.  I believe that he was going to attempt a port to linux.  He also
metioned that there was a renderer that took advantage of this.  Could someone
give more information?

Thanks in advance.
Edwin Ramirez
ramirez@mcclb0.med.nyu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: andrewc@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Andrew J. Cosgriff !)
Subject: Re: Where is cdefs.h ?
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 09:14:06 GMT

riipinen@dxcern.cern.ch (Petri Juhani Riipinen) writes:

Do a make dep
to set up the dependencies properly - this gets rid of the cdefs.h problem

Enjoy !

Cos  !
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 * Andrew J. Cosgriff ! *                   #include <std_witty_quote.h>
#define HERE cc.monash.edu.au               #include <std_disclaimer.h>
Hassle me at :      andrewc@aurora.HERE ; andrewc@lindblat.HERE ; cos@yoyo.HERE
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: tfoley@camaro.uucp (Tim Foley)
Subject: Re: It's installed, now what?  (was Re: A flight of marketing fancy)
Organization: camaro
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 00:36:16 GMT

In article <C0FvMp.A2y@jti.com> richb@jti.com (Richard Braun) writes:
>I wrote:
>>The way to make Linux applications happen is pure marketing savvy.
>
>I was musing a number of hours after the above about where I go from
>here with my newly-installed Linux system.  If I throw out my
>mailing-list, address-book, word-processing, and spreadsheet programs
>previously used on the system, and manage to decide that I never want
>to use them again, I still have the following question:
>
>	Now what?
>
>The system has far superior communications capability than any DOS
>machine.  It's got Internet email, and could have netnews if I wanted
>to install it.  I started handing out the dialup number to a few of
>my friends, but it occurs to me in this era of ubiquitous email
>connectivity that there's little incentive for them to actually use
>it as just another email drop.  It's got a great software dev
>environment, but at the end of a workday the last thing I want to do
>is go home & type "g++" at a relatively slow computer's command prompt.
>
>So please follow up on this thread with your answers to "now what?"  What
>useful things have you found you've been using your Linux system for since
>you got it installed to your liking?




   EMPIRE!!!!!   What else is there to life?  Besides Z28's & Sex...

 



-- 
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
               The HeartBeat of America...Yesterdays Camaro Z28 
                             tfoley@camaro.uucp   
     Call the Camaro Linux Pub-access site: 1-416-238-6550 USRobotics HST
    Note: Please, no ftpmail or mailing lists or the host gets annoyed :)
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: sethf@athena.mit.edu (Seth Finkelstein)
Subject: Question: Problem with installing SLS 0.98pl5 on EISA SCSI
Keywords: SCSI, Future Domain, EISA
Organization: Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 15:26:51 GMT

      I have a clone 486DX2-66, EISA bus, with a Future Domain TMC 7000
32 bit EISA SCSI controller running a 1 gigabyte Fuji SCSI disk.  I
copied SLS 0.98pl5 from tsx-11 onto floppies. When I try to install, it
reads and boots from the first disk (a1) without a problem, but in the
process does not recognize the SCSI disk (i.e.  detects 0 SCSI disks).
This is very puzzling, since the FAQ lists many Future Domain
controllers as being supported, and I am told the TMC 7000 is descended
from the Western Digital 7000FASST, which is also listed as supported.
Does anyone have any idea as to what the problem could be?

Thanks in advance
--
Seth Finkelstein 	sethf@athena.mit.edu	"No quote"
From: rcopg@minyos.xx.rmit.OZ.AU (Paul Gortmaker)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Kernel FP Math bug?
Date: 12 Jan 93 03:31:09 GMT
Organization: RMIT Computer Centre
NNTP-Posting-Host: minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au

wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Lars Wirzenius) writes:

[...stuff deleted]

>I just love people who scream "compiler bug" or "operating system bug"
>when they can't see what's wrong with their own code.  Both compilers
>and OS's have bugs (I know they do, I've found a number myself), but
>the probability of finding one is fairly small.

That's why I have 3 different C compilers on line --- I just don't trust
myself!!! Too bad they are on the DOS partition.  ;-)

						Paul.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: ammond@gdls.CSCTMD.COM (Joe Ammond)
Subject: SUMMARY: Linux on a Cyrix 486DLC..
Organization: Computer Sciences Corp. @ General Dynamics
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:05:20 GMT

Well, I received 2 responses from people who had run Linux on the new Cyrix
486DLC chip, and a couple of "me too" requests, so I'm posting this summary.

Now I need to find a decent price for a 486DLC motherboard.. :)

Summary follows:

-----

From: scott@eagle.natinst.com (Scott A. Taylor)
Subject: Re: Linux on a Cyrix 486DLC..

I've run Linux on a 33 MHz Cyrix 486DLC (Linux 0.99 pl0) with 128K cache, 4
megs RAM, ISA bus, Cyrix 33 MHz 387, etc.  It seems to run just fine.  No
bugs or gotchas so far.  We got the motherboard from Artek in California; I
don't know if they sell to individuals or just dealers.

If you have any questions, feel free to reply; I'll tell you what I can.  I
haven't tried to run X on it, but it's stable under a pretty heavy load 
(building the kernel on one VC while compiling, etc. on another) and floating
point operations work OK, too.

Scott
scott@natinst.com

-----

From: Andrew Tristan <atristan@ucru1>
Subject: Re: Linux on a Cyrix 486DLC..

I have Linux running on my Cyrix 486DLC; I used the SLS package, and ran
into no significant problems.  It's been running for about three weeks
now, without a single crash :).  Unfortunately, I have only
4 Mb ram, so I can't use X.  

Performance-wise, the 486DLC is on par with a 486-25DX, so I would
recommend the Cyrix over the options you list in your article.  I paid
about $480 for the motherboard, the cpu, the fpu (Cyrix 387+) and 4Mb,
at one of these stadium computer sales.

I heard recently that the Cyrix bombs under NeXTStep 486, but I could
care less about that.  I have had no problems whatsoever.  Let me know if
there's more you want to know.

-- 
Andrew Tristan            | Truth, far from being a solemn and
atristan@ac.ucr.edu       | severe master, is a docile and
atristan@ucrvms           | obediant servant.    - Nelson Goodman

-----
ja.
-- 
Suicidal Cyko Joe Ammond                                  ammond@gdls.CSCTMD.COM
Unix System Administrator                          Computer Sciences Corporation
           "I don't speak for Computer Sciences bla bla bla ...."
From: christian.perrier@lill.frmug.fr.mugnet.org (Christian Perrier)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: COMPILING .99.1 - PROBLEM
Date: 9 Jan 93 11:03:00 GMT
Reply-To: christian.perrier@lill.frmug.fr.mugnet.org (Christian Perrier)
Organization: Li'LL BBS - Paris, France


 BM> init/main.c: In function 'start_kernel':
 BM> init/main.c:241: too many arguements to function 'inode_init'
 BM> init/main.c:241: void value not ignored as it out to be
 BM> make: *** [init/main.o] Error 1

Had exactly the same problems here with 099-pl2.....:-(

Christian

--- GEcho 1.00/beta+
 * Origin: <<BuBulle System>> 78 Maurepas FR (2:320/200)
                          
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: drew@caesar.cs.colorado.edu (Drew Eckhardt)
Subject: Re: Linux Screen Capture
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 09:09:11 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.145014.22221@athena.mit.edu> bonavent@montefiore.ulg.ac.be (BONAVENTURE Olivier chercheur) writes:
>
>I'm looking for a program allowing to make snapshots of Linux screens. It would
>be nice if this screen capture was in a GIF format, but it's not necessary.
>If such a program doesn't exist, is there any way to use a standard screen 
>capture utility through the DOS emulator ? I guess not, but ...
>

In textmode, you can use setterm -dump, which will create an ASCII 
format file.

Under X, you can use xwd -root > file.  xpr can convert this to postscript,
which can be printed or run through ghostscript to get something else.



-- 
Boycott AT&T for their absurd anti-BSDI lawsuit. | Drew Eckhardt
Condemn Colorado for Amendment Two.		 | drew@cs.colorado.edu
Use Linux, the fast, flexible, and free 386 unix |
From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: SysV Init Work with 0.99?
Date: 10 Jan 1993 23:22:49 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

tfoley@camaro.uucp (Tim Foley) writes:


>Does anyone have Miquels SYS V Init working with 0.99p1?  I just got it
>and it looks great, I've been looking for a real INIT for a while now.
> 
>Also, Peter, What version of Init does SLS use?  Poegl?  And any idea whats 
>the difference (Besides the Run Levels).
> 
>-- 

I have been running the sysvinit since the day he released it. It works great
with 0.99.2 and before. It sets up rather easily and works fine otherwise.

James
From: wolff@liberator.et.tudelft.nl (Rogier Wolff)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: DOS emulation
Date: 5 Jan 93 10:54:18 GMT
Organization: Delft University of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering

jhallen@world.std.com (Joseph H Allen) writes:

>In article <memo.837633@cix.compulink.co.uk> jburtona@cix.compulink.co.uk writes:
>>DOS emulation

>>Rather than running a copy of MSDOS in an virual 8086, wouldn't it be 
>>nice to have a free dos-like operating system that was capable of
>>running DOS programs?

>I was seriously considering doing this once.  The difficulty of the problem
>depends on the level of compatibility you wish to achieve:
[ some things]	
>		Also many programs use DOS extenders to get access to 386
>		features...

>So it ends up being quite a bit of work.  The ultimate in compatibility
>would be to get Windows to run in your MS-DOS, but it might actually be
>easier to simulate the Windows API then to simulate MS-DOS and run real
>Windows in it.

Now I don't agree with this. the windows API has in the HUNDREDS of calls.
Also given that hardware is slightly logical because making exceptions
and so forth in silicon is very expensive. 

This is what is wrong with the current DOS emulator. It starts by emulating 
the MSDOS API. You should start by emulating the hardware, and after you
are able to run MSDOS using that, you can start optimizing performance
and functionality by trapping some MSDOS calls that you know are often 
used and are best emulated. The basic hardware that  MSDOS needs is:
Keyboard/timers/video/floppy (harddisk).

At first video emulation need only be at 80x25 textmode. In the end it 
shouldn't be too hard to detect "going into graphics", and emulate that
too. It might become a little slow, but it should at least work....

>Rewriting a stand-alone version of MS-DOS is probably less difficult than
>making a hack for linux.  At least then you don't have to worry about the
>hardware compatibility.

No comment.

						Roger
-- 
****   a 486 in V86 mode is like a VW buggy with a 6 litre V12 motor.  ****
EMail:  wolff@duteca.et.tudelft.nl   ** Tel  +31-15-783644 or +31-15-142371
From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: correction to release.libc-4.2 notes
Date: 4 Jan 1993 23:10:33 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

jepstei@afterlife.ncsc.mil (John Epstein) writes:

>If you already have a version of libc.so.4.2 the instructions cause
>libc.so.4 to disappear --- I actually recovered without using bootdisk.
>by mcopy to floppy and mcopy to /lib since my mcopy didn't use libc.so.4

>BTW: It might be nice if ln was -static so ln -sf always available!!!

>The problem with the instructions is:

>cp libc.so.4.2 libc.so.4.2.old --> libc.so.4.2.ol for 14 char minix file system
>the next line is
>ln -sf libc.so.4.2.old libc.so.4 --> generates a 15 char symbolic link

>I thought this would work as identical for first 14 char

>My system died on the mv libc.so.4.2 foo

>I am running linux-0.99 pl 1 prior to begin of libc-4.2 and gcc-2.3.3

>John

Two comments here: 

1). Always keep backups of the old library when installing a new one.

2). Your comment about ln brings up one question in my mind... Why don't
	you recompile it then??? Remember, this is YOUR system and you
	can do what you want. Everything that comes from the various
	installation programs will probably be linked shared just to save
	disk space. Recompile some important utils and put them in /sbin.

( I'm not trying to be snide or anything, but a lot of people seem to think
they can't do anything to their systems without asking first. Remember,
this is a lot more complex than dos, and people have to make decisions on
their own sometime. Maybe this will someday cut down on traffic is people
remember this. )

James
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: dave@auspost.com.au (Dave Cole)
Subject: Archive Tape work?
Organization: Australia Post
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 01:53:13 GMT

I have the option to buy a tape controller/drive cheap, does anyone
know if this works with linux?

Controller card has on it
	Archive SC402
	80567-102-REV-H

Tape drive is 150Meg

Thanks in advance - Dave
From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Corrupt 'tar' man page
Date: 10 Jan 1993 07:01:10 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

danubius@halcyon.com (Joseph R. Pannon) writes:

>In article <1io8dqINNrc@matt.ksu.ksu.edu> probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon) writes:

>>This is a texinfo file. Its readable under the info program. This should be
>>available on tsx-11.mit.edu. You could get the tar sources from any gnu site.

>Thanks, J. M., but that only is half the answer I need.  I want it to
>work under the 'man' program, just as the other pages that do work.  In
>other words, how can I convert that text into the format 'man' uses.
>Or is tar a command that is 'not supposed' to have a 'man' doc format? 

>Joe Pannon

You can look for something that converts tex to troff format, but then you
would have to install tex. Your best bet is to get the tar sources and see
if there's a man page in them. Good bet that there is, since I have one
on line, and I installed tar myself.

James
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: vince@victrola.sea.wa.us (Vince Skahan)
Subject: how to increase size of X display on the screen ?
Organization: Vince and Suzie's Underpowered PC
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 02:49:45 GMT

I'm running Xmono quite happily (v1.1) but notice that the root window
doesn't take up all the picture area on the monitor...basically it's 
offset somewhat toward the bottom right.

How can I go about finding the right clock settings or whatever to take
the whole monitor display area and not part of it ?  The FAQs sure don't
seem too clear no matter how many times I read them...

Any help would be appreciated.

-- 
     ---------- Vince Skahan --------- vince@victrola.sea.wa.us ----------
                  +++ A Waffle Iron - Linux Division +++
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: mwpoag@thurston.austin.ibm.com (Michael Wayne Poag)
Subject: Re: ST01/02 and Syquest 5110
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 15:24:44 GMT
Reply-To: mwpoag@thurston.austin.ibm.com (Michael Wayne Poag)
Organization: IBM Austin, TX
Keywords: sto1, scsi add after boot, scsi spin-up


How does one...
 1) add a scsi drive after boot-up
 2) get the st01 to tell a drive to spin-up

I am running v.98p1 of HJ Lu's install and the st01 is recognized but 
my drive never gets told to spin-up (it doesn't have a jumper for that)
.. linux keeps looking for the partition table but can't because the drive
isn't spinning ....

is there new scsi code that will fix this ?

any ideas appreciated
Michael



Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: spierce@wam.umd.edu (Stephen Pierce)
Subject: MudOS_0.9.14
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 05:18:11 GMT

  Has anyone succesfully compiled (and ran <g>) the MudOS
under linux? I've been trying with little luck. If I could
just get a .tar of your src directory and a few compile directions...
<grin> Please respond via e-mail..Thanks!

Steve

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: amir@avalon.physik.unizh.ch (Guindehi Amir)
Subject: Re: Gcc 2.3.3, gcc 2.2.2d and -V
Organization: University of Zurich, Department of Computer Science
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 17:07:44 GMT

OkOk !!! Sorry and thanks .... it works now ! ;-))))

- Amir Guindehi


Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: beppe@sabrina.dei.unipd.it (Giuseppe Zanetti)
Subject: problem with Seyon
Organization: D.E.I. Universita' di Padova, Italia
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 10:18:29 GMT

Hi linuxers,

I have Seyon 1.6 (binaries for linux found in the official seyon site at mit),
it works well, but i have a problem with overlapping buttons (toggles) in
the set windows (and in another window that i do not remeber).

can anyone help me

Giuseppe


-- 
     _/ _/_/  _/_/_/_/                 Giuseppe Zanetti
   _/   ___       _/                   beppe@sabrina.dei.unipd.it
  _/     _/    _/
   _/ _/_/  _/_/_/_/
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: riipinen@dxcern.cern.ch (Petri Juhani Riipinen)
Subject: Where is cdefs.h ?
Organization: CERN European Laboratory for Particle Physics
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 08:38:52 GMT

Hello there, fellow Linuxers...

I don't know, why it always seem to happen to me. I haven't been able to
recompile the kernel without a hitch even once. I got the latest SLS last
week and installed it at friday. Well, I ran the make config and answered
the questions. I didn't want TCP/IP (I have no networking at home...).
Well, when I compiled, ld complained about the non-existance of net.o. Well
it was obviously supposed to come from the files in net/tcp directory.
Ok, I decided then to take TCP/IP. So I reconfigured and everything went
smoothly, until it complains, that it doesn't know, how to make cdefs.h...
I thought, that you were not supposed to make .h files? And I tried to
find this file everywhere, but no luck...

So, has anybody else had the same problem with missing (?) cdefs.h, and
how did you solve it?

I somehow get the feeling, that the config script has not been tested with
all possible options and it only works with certain options... I'm probably
wrong, but that is the impression, that I got with the fiddling with TCP/IP.


- Petri -

PS. Besides that, the installation went very smoothly and everything else
    works like a dream...:)
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petri J. Riipinen                (riipinen@dxcern.cern.ch)
Les terrases de Thoiry n.15      (riipin@vxldb1.cern.ch)
01710 Thoiry,  France            (riipin_dev@vxldb2.cern.ch)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jsaker@cwis.unomaha.edu (James R. Saker Jr.)
Subject: Wanted: tcsh-6.03 for Linux .98p5
Keywords: tcsh,linux
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 03:51:07 GMT

I've dug around thru tsx-11 and sunsite but haven't located the 6.03
version of tcsh. Is anyone aware of a compiled set of binaries and/or
the source modified for Linux? Thanks!

.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
.  Jamie Saker					jsaker@cwis.unomaha.edu    .
.  Network Costing Analyst			Business/MIS Major	   .
.  Telenational Communications			Univ. Nebraska at Omaha	   .
.  (402) 392-7548							   .
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .