HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Define "Single"
Date: 16 Oct 92 11:52:44 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki, Finland

In <1992Oct15.183232.835@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:

>{Note: previous distribution was 'usa'.  Although I'm not in the habit
>of doing so for this newsgroup, I reset it, and am quoting the entire
>article.}

Thanks, at least I appreciate it.  The distribution flag is useful
especially when you are talking about very local things, but most
topics are general enough to be distributed to every country.  For
instance, I think that boink announcements are very interesting.  I've
often wondered what people would say if I appeared in one of them. :)

>In article <1992Oct14.202321.9570@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>>
>>I know this has been discussed before, but does the "single" in
>>soc.singles mean NOT MARRIED or NOT IN A RELATIONSHIP?

IMO, not in a relationship.

>>
>>Is there an assumption that all single people want to be not
>>single?

No

>>Does participation in soc.singles imply that you are looking for
>>someone to have a relationship with and want to do so by having
>>them send you email?

No

>I think that this newsgroup is for discussion of items that are of
>interest to 'single' people, where the precise definition of 'single' is
>mostly irrelevent to the nature of most of the discussions.  What
>appears to be more difficult to determine is what discussion subjects
>belong here.

Actually anything can be of interest to single people, so with that
definition everything belongs here.  But there are better newsgroups
for certain subjects such as personal ads ( alt.personals.*,
soc.penpals) and pure flirting (alt.romance.chat).  I've always
considered this a good place to learn new ideas of being single and
still having an interesting life.  And I admit that I have learned a
lot.

>I don't think that participation in s.s implies that you are looking for
>a relationship, but I think that posting anything anywhere on the Net
>opens you up to return e-mail.

I agree.  But, accepting email and looking for a relationship are two
very different things.  There are also some people that don't like
email replies.
-- 
Juha Taina  taina@cs.helsinki.fi  Phone: +358-0-708-4247
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: Re: Playground Bullies (was Re: BARBIE DOES IT
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 92 23:11:27 GMT

In article 6022@nynexst.com, clare@nynexst.com (Clare Chu) writes:
>In article <1992Oct7.162053.3664@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>> 
>>>
>>> > At some point a man has to do what a man has to do.
>>>
>>>Wow, what a macho phrase!  I take it you don't believe it's important
>>>for women to be able to defend themselves against attack.  Else why
>>>the gender-specific remark?
>> 
>> I don't see a lot of bullys man handling girls out on the playground.
>
>  That's because you're not a girl.  Girl bullies exist also.  And
>  as for "man-handling", try "sexual harrassment".  As a girl, you
>  have to deal with the girl bullies as well as the boy sexual harrassers.
>  With girl bullies, you size up the situation, see if you can win
>  and give them a quick elbow to the side, or a kick on the knee.
>  Don't fight girly, as they usually expect hair-pulling or scratching
>  (both ineffective).  Then you tell them, "Don't you try that again."
>  Racist bullies are handled the same way, if they are not in a group.
>  If they're in a group, the best strategy is to retreat and taunt
>  them back, yelling "patty melt" while retreating towards the Black
>  and Hispanic kids.  
>
>  Sexual harrassers, i.e. boys in elementary school, junior high,
>  or high school who feel that they are entitled to pinch your
>  breasts, buttocks, legs, get an elbow punch in the ribs
>  and "Stop that, sleazebag." or a quick sidestep as you see
>  them approaching with that glint in their eyes.
>

What about little girls beating up on littler boys? How should littler
boys handle that?

What can parents do about it? This has bothered me since I was the littler boy.

Andy.
From: wjb@moscom.com (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Simian crease (was Re: Open letter to Edward V. Wright)
Date: 15 Oct 92 14:16:34 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford NY
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.3 beta PL7]

Herb Huston (huston@access.digex.com) wrote:
: It's just
: more evidence that there are ape genes swimming in the human gene pool.

It's after Labor Day.  Tell them they have to stop that until May.  And
who forgot to drain the gene pool?
-- 
Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: Lasagna (was Re: Best of Friends)
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 17:37:02 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.135048.1@sscl.uwo.ca> carl@sscl.uwo.ca (Carl Kaufmann) writes:
>In article <4614@moscom.com>, wjb@moscom.com (Bill de Beaubien) writes:
>
>> Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Unfortunately, I had to leave early.
>How was it?

Interesting.  When was the last time *you* had lasagna with bacon strips
and slices of pepperoni?
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Who needs Lime Jello [tm]?  We had lasagna.....
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: relationship gone to pot?
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 20:06:53 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.162606.23346@clsi.COM> kevin@clsi.com writes:
>
>In article <12OCT92.15230625@verbis.waisman.wisc.edu>, kingston@verbis.waisman.wisc.edu writes:
>> 85% of the relationships today are dysfunctional ...
>
>So what percentage of (single) people are dysfunctional ? - 85% or 42.5% ?
>
>Just wondered what my chances were,

Well, assuming that a relationship is dysfunctional iff one or more of the
people involved are dysfunctional and the respective probability of each
one being dysfunctional is independent of the dysfunctional/non-dysfunctional
status of the other, I'd say that 61% of individuals are dysfunctional,
assuming, of course, that the probability of being in a relationship is
independent of dysfunctionality.

Your chances personally, though, are probably much closer to 100% 

Trygve
From: brentaa@ac.dal.ca (brent, eh?)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Define "Single"
Date: 16 Oct 92 01:19:57 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In article <Bw4r6q.KIE@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (Nance Colucci) writes:
> 
>>Is there an assumption that all single people want to be not single?
> 
> Well, there seems to be an assumption that wanting to be not-single is
> in some way pathological.  :-)

Being single is, for many people, a chronic disease which, though not highly
contagious, can cause bouts of depression, which is best combated by
depressing other people with one's problems, which may explain the presence
of some of us here...;-)
> 
>>Does participation in soc.singles imply that you are looking for
>>someone to have a relationship with and want to do so by having
>>them send you email?
> 
> Well, if you are in fact single and participate, it probably means you
> are looking for a relationship.  
> 
> But I doubt very much it means you want to "have a relationship with"
> someone by "having them send you email."

Especially when the person your having an email relationship with probably
lives on the other side of the continent, or further away...
(by the way, are there any other readers of this group who live in
Atlantic Canada???...just curious...)
Email builds friendships, and some Boinks may led to relationships, but I 
inagine that most of the chonically single are looking for things a 
little closer to home...:-)
just my two cents worth....
that's 1.6 cents american  
					-Brontosaur the chronically single
From: wjb@moscom.com (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: HI, I am a HOMOSEXUAL! Send me mail
Date: 13 Oct 92 13:11:32 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford NY
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.3 beta PL7]

krgjus01@uctvax.uct.ac.za wrote:
: But I'd like to know from an expert in the field - how the fuck do you get the
: shit off your dick ?
: 
: advice would be greatly appreciated .
Try using a very sharp knife.
-- 
Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tyger@netcom.com (Kitty in the Middle)
Subject: Re: Does anybody celebrate a Deathday?
Organization:  Funk the Dumb Stuff!
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 19:21:01 GMT

atovorni@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>smersch@eng.clemson.edu (Steve.) writes:
>>I do.  Last year (October 19), I fell off of a waterfall and broke several 
>>things (pelvic bone, back and neck... c6 and c7 was the worst, "pulverized", 
>>they said). I am just happy to still be here and have decided to make a 
>>yearly celebration out of it.
>
>My landlady celebrates the day her husband died every month.
>
>Andreas.

I will be celebrating Christmas this year as always, but I will also remember
my grandfather's death, if not actually *celebrate* it. (12/25/91)

   Tyger

-- 
      Kristen Kohlbecker    And I would choose to be with you
      tyger@netcom.com      That's if the choice were mine to make   
                            But you can make decisions too
      A Tyger and a Lady    And you can have this heart to break 
 
                       
        
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: How long has it been?
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 18:21:10 GMT

In article <Oct14.084517.51847@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> peters@CS.ColoState.EDU (eric peters) writes:
>So, if all you people have been kissed by an SO of some sort in the last 
>6 hours, What are you doing reading the singles group?

Gloating.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Who needs Lime Jello [tm]?  We had lasagna.....
From: sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart)
Subject: Re: More on guys who aren't dating Ed Wright
Organization: my opinions only
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 22:04:37 GMT

In article <JULIE.92Oct6143107@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu>
julie@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu (Julie Wright) writes:

>	IMHO, "Wright" is a bad last name to have.

And, worst of all,

people might think you're related to Ed.

Seth		sethb@fid.morgan.com
From: 01ksdavis@bsu-ucs.uucp (Rebel without a clue.)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Farewell all.
Date: 11 Oct 92 18:56:13 GMT
Distribution: na

In article <4072@cvbnetPrime.COM>, bmeyer@feds12.prime.com (Bob Meyer) writes:
> In article <1992Oct8.205557.17438@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
> |> In article <1992Oct8.142018.10264@bsu-ucs.uucp> 01ksdavis@bsu-ucs.uucp (Rebel without a clue.) writes:
> |> >-- 
> |> >
> |> >	Just letting everybody else in the newsgroup that I will no longer be
> |> >in this newsgroup.  Not even as a lurker as of something that has recently 
> |> >happened to me.
> |> >
> |> >	So, look for me in either alt.romance from now on, or even soc.couples.
> |> >
> |> >	Keep smiling everybody.
> |> >	Kyle
> |>  
> |> Bwah Bwa Bwa. Bwa Bwa Bwa.
> |> Bwa bwabwa. Bwa bwabwa. Bwa bwabwaaaaaa
> |> Bwa bwa bwa bwabwabwaaaaaaa
> |>  
> 
>    Don't worry ... he'll be back!  ;-)
-- 

	Wish to God your weren't right.


		:-(Kyle
 ______________________________________________________________________________
|Kyle S. Davis				                                       |
|2000HD	1MbRAM//                                Hot VWs               1973     |
|1084s       //  Only Amiga makes it possible,    \/   Take 2 home-   311      |
|Oki 20   \\//   All others make it plausible.   \/\/  They're small.          |
|
|______________________________________________________________________________|
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,talk.bizarre
From: osa@wilbur.unh.edu (Bart Simps.. er.. Oktay Ahiska)
Subject: Re: How long has it been?
X-Advertisement: Use Emacs
Organization: Springfield Elementary School
	<BvtH1J.Gyr@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Oct9.105622.23045@wam.umd.edu>
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 15:30:35 GMT
Comments: Euclid was a square


Joseph Edward Huesmann <huesmann@wam.umd.edu> writes:

-> Would you all who've been kissed in the last 5 minutes quit rubbing
-> it in?

On the other hand, those who haven't been kissed for a while, will
find it quite difficult to quit rubbing *it*.  (IN BED, as one might
add.) 

Ironically, I'm listenning to "Love To Be Loved" by Peter Gabriel
right now. 




--
The opinions expressed above are my own, and not necessarily those of UNH.
 Cute signature quote by They Might Be Giants: D, world destruction /
  Over an overture / N, do I need / Apostrophe T, need this torture?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: WANTED WOMAN 27 +
Keywords: Mature, sincere funloving **W 27+ wanted
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 14 Oct 92 19:00:58 GMT

stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>You know you've been reading the net too long when you blink at a post like
>this several times and you keep seeing: I am looking for a mature worm.

hymowitz@whatever.cs.jhu.edu (Hymie!) replies:
>at this point in time, i'd /take/ a mature worm... *sigh*

Fishing for a relationship?

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
From: brentaa@ac.dal.ca (brent, eh?)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: I need advice on girlfriends fantasies.
Date: 12 Oct 92 04:21:52 -0300
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In article <1992Oct12.045114.23499@cam.compserv.utas.edu.au>, rhoge1@esk.compserv.utas.edu.au ([Robert James Hoge]) writes:
> Hi.
> I am not single, but I enjoy reading some of the stuff that comes into
> this newsgroup.  I have a wonderful girlfriend, quite attractive and all
> that.  I also have a problem about other girls.  Mainly friends of my girl-
> friend or friends of my friends.  These girls are always trying something
> with me, like trying to get me into bed with them, or trying to get me to
> leave my girlfriend for them.  These girls are quite rich and very beautiful,
only a problem if you give in...;-)
> but so is my girlfriend.  I love my girlfriend very much and she loves me,
> and we have a very strong bond between us.  The girls that are friends of
> my girlfriend always talk to her about their fantasies, and now MY girlfriend
> has gotten this fantasy in her head to have a threesome or even a foursome
> with one or two of her friends.  This may all sound quite fine, but I am
> getting confused about my girlfriend and where I stand.
> 
> Could my girlfriend have something for other girls or could she just
> have this fantasy for me being shared with her friends?  Also, my
> girlfriend is always bragging (lately anyway) about my "impressive"
> size, which just encourages her friends even more.
> 
> Just someone tell me what's going on.  Thanks.
> 
Hooooo boy!  Can't let this slide by now can we!
Well, my friend, it sounds like you have the kind of problems the rest
of us would kill to have   :-)
but seriously, I wouldn't worry about your girlfriend having a thing for
other fems, it not uncommon for any straight person to have same sex
fantasies
If she is open minded about it and wants to have some fun with you
and her friends, you should relax and enjoy it.
But be sure to be honest with her about how you feel, both before and
after, and if you feel uncomfortable with what is going on, stop.
This kind of thing can be a wonderful experience if it happens between
people who truly care about each other and are open and honest about it.
But it can also be a bad thing if that is neglected.
Also, I would suggest you don't make it a regular occurance...:-)
once in a long while is all most normal humans can handle....
					-Brontosaur wishes he had this problem
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: The proof is in the Pooding
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 11:05:36 GMT

dkeller@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dave Keller) writes:
] atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik) writes:
] 
] >My biased view is that despite Victorian myths, Men are generally more
] >prone to sentimentality than women. This is not to say that some women 
] >cannot be more mushy than some men.
] 
] I agree entirely.  Women can be brutally pragmatic.  If you cannot further
] their agenda, then you're toast - yesterday's news.
] 
] But with time we all learn - and get hard-hearted.  We go from starry-eyed
] nice-guy to flaming jerk.  Which is better anyway since that is what women
] want.
] 
] Quick!  Someone flame me cruelly!  I may not be a total jerk yet - I need
] help!

Dave 

thank you for sharing this heart warming Emotionally
balanced view of Modern women and their pragmatic
approach to problem solving. I can think of no clearer
proof of Andreas' general hypothesis that men are little
more than a bag of sentimental drippings and emotionally
unstable garbage.

ciao
drieux


-- 
Modern Day Problems:
In any case, don't give up, just type slower :-).
Chimo
Bob.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle)
Subject: Re: Ipisissimus
Organization: Indiana University
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 19:08:09 GMT

>jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>> ... phila. I'm not coming anymore.
>>Too scared.

sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:

>Oh, come on.  
>Kiran and I were so looking forward to winning all your seesters...

Actually, I just want his money.  
You can have the seesters all to yourself.  *smile*

-- 
"The world is empty if one thinks only of mountains, rivers, and cities;
 but to know someone here and there who thinks and feels with us,
 and who, thought distant, is close to us in spirit,
 this makes the earth for us an inhabited garden."...............Goethe
-- 

Kiran Wagle                           <kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
Xref: sparky soc.singles:27831 alt.sex:33049 talk.abortion:42832
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: More Questions we all wanted to ask
Date: 15 Oct 92 16:45:28 GMT
Followup-To: soc.singles
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <thurlow.719034723@convex.convex.com> thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
|>>
|>> > yes, i make a lifestyle choice to live near an airbase. i control
|>> > that, i take the risk. i also control exactly where my dick is at
|>> > all times.
|>>
|>> Great, tell me how to keep mine from getting tangled in the leg-hole of
|>> my briefs!
|
|>I find a velcro strap just above the knee keeps it out of harm's way.
|
|Has anubody else tried braiding theirs?

You have three of them?  I bet you're real popular with the ladies.

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: relationship gone to pot?
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 05:52:02 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.052843.8484@netcom.com> shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller) writes:
>
>And, yes, while I do like Kenn Barry a lot, and think he is a terrific
>person, if he asked me over to lunch, then said he was going to polish
>his car, I'd do the decent thing and leave the two of them alone together.

Of course, if he offered to take you for a spin, you'd jump on it
immediately.  You women are all alike, fall for the first guy in a fast
sportscar.  (Or would you do the feminist thing and take him for a spin
in *your* sportscar?)

Some of you may think I'm making a joke.  I'm not.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Who needs Lime Jello [tm]?  We had lasagna.....
From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Female geeks
Date: 14 Oct 92 23:32:49 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.


You see, I warned you!  Next time, before you post something here,
check with the soc.single political correctness committee, Nancy
Colucci, chairman... er, chairwoman... chairhuman... chairhuperson...
ehr, chairhuperoffspring (whew! :-), or her dancing chimp, Jimmy Dutton.
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Dangerous Sexual Fantasies.
Date: 12 Oct 92 16:58:41 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

ekman@netcom.com (Crossly the Glad-Eyed Bear) writes:

>In article <1992Oct9.134651.2770@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>>
>>There are LOTS and LOTS of Evil Wicked Wanton
>>ProblemOlderWomen out there on the net willing
>>to take advantage of shy quiet naive innocent waifs
>>from small towns in the Midwest. but All they really
>>want you for is Sheer Brutal Raw SEX.

>There are?  Then someone must be hoarding them, drieux.  Is it you?

Well, no, it's not just drieux.

--
Stef                           Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...
stef@apple.com                                         
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: hymowitz@whatever.cs.jhu.edu (Hymie!)
Subject: Re: WANTED WOMAN 27 +
Keywords: Mature, sincere funloving **W 27+ wanted
Organization: Creative Sensualities dept, Jacquie's House of Underwear
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 00:32:47 GMT

and lo, there was much rejoicing among the people, as
  ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
>stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>>You know you've been reading the net too long when you blink at a post like
>>this several times and you keep seeing: I am looking for a mature worm.
>
>hymowitz@whatever.cs.jhu.edu (Hymie!) replies:
>>at this point in time, i'd /take/ a mature worm... *sigh*
>
>Fishing for a relationship?

bassically.  i'm floundering through the current one, which started
as a fluke.

--hymie
hymowitz@cs.jhu.edu                                         hymie@jhuvms.bitnet
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When I'm with you, I don't know whether I should study
neurosurgery or go and see the Care Bears Movie.        --''Weird'' Al Yankovic
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Christina.Ryan@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Christina Ryan)
Subject: What is a boink?
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 07:19:44 GMT


Please excuse a foreign lurker for what may
seem like a rather stupid question:
What exactly is a "boink"?
I have been reading about these trans-USA boinks
and I am very curious as to what actually goes on.  

Christina

PS. I'm at the University of South Australia, 
despite what the disclaimer below says :-).
Email sssgs@ntx.city.unisa.edu.au
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80