HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: roberts@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Raiders wipped Bills!)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Raiders kick Butt!
Date: 12 Oct 92 22:59:58 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


  Congrats to my beloved Raiders for looking really good yesterday and
beating up the Bills.  Dickerson actually looked ok as well.  The
defense was dominating and finally got Kelly and Co back for the
playoff whipping a couple years ago.

  Has anyone heard anything about the Bills bickering yet?  Two of the
major reasons why I don't like the Bills are their bickering and
bitching and moaning and excuses for losing as well as Bruce Smith.
The man is a great player who happens to have to tell the rest of the
world about it and that really aggravates me.  Anyway, I was just
hoping that they don't start their moaning and bickering again.  The
Bills have a week off to suck it up and get ready for the Jets.

  Now the Raiders head on the road to Seattle and then off to the Vet
for a rough one in Philly!!!!  Raiders are on their way to a 12-4
season!!!


  In case anyone cares, my miscellaneous thoughts follow:

(1) Miami is undefeated, but not really planning up to par IMHO.
Seems like Marino is pulling these games out of his ass when they
really shouldn't be that close!  If the 'Phins come to play for four 
quarters, WATCH OUT!

(2) I'm disappointed at the Eagles let down this past Sunday...Rich
Kotite expressed concern about a letdown on his show broadcast before
the game here in Philly.  KC looked great, but it is totally against 
my religion to root for an AFC West team other than my beloved Raiders!

(3) I hate John Elway and hope that the Broncos get destroyed tonight
in Washington!
--
Shawn A. Roberts (roberts@eniac.seas.upenn.edu) | "...I was lined up
University of Pennsylvania CSE '93              |  for glory, but the
Dining Philosophers Computer Science Group VP   |  tickets sold out in
ACACIA International Fraternity Brother         |  advance..." -Neil Peart
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: reams@crchh462.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Cary Reams)
Subject: Re: Cowboys: Wright trade soon?
Reply-To: reams@bnr.ca
Organization: NT/BNR
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 22:25:51 GMT

In article <1b45r3INNmcc@news.aero.org>, mas@aero.org (Marcus A.Shaw) writes:
|> In article <1992Oct9.121216.574@ticipa.pac.sc.ti.com> robert@landru.mtc.ti.com (Robert Treese) writes:
|> >
|> >With the activation of Jimmy Smith,  look for Ace to be traded soon
|> >for a backup running back and some other compensation.
|> >
|> 
|> Ditto from this neck of the woods, except that the Cowboys may try
|> to get strictly a draft choice for him.  I would be surprised if he
|> had much trade value, but maybe I misunderstand the value of speed in
|> the NFL.  Maybe someone is just looking for a kick returner...
|> 
|> Let's see, who could Dallas get?  And what does this possibility mean for
|> the future of Blake and Richards?  They are not that far from being ready,
|> and Dallas only has room in its offense for 4 RB....
|> 
|> How about these possibilities?
|> 
|> Trade to NO for Dalton Hilliard (they want a new WR)
|> Trade to SD for Harmon (not much 2nd WR production in last few weeks)
|> Trade to Raiders for Marcus Allen (hmmmm, probably too much to ask
|>         for, but it sure make a lot of sense..., but too many $
|> Other Raider running backs possibly, they have a large stable...
|> but they don't need another WR....
|> 
|> Well, those are my best guesses, any others?
|> 
|> *ice*
|> 
|> 
Well,   How 'bout Ace and a #2 to KC for Percy Snow and a #3 ?




-- 
Cary W Reams | "...truth demands to be declared, even if it is
NT/BNR/MTXVO | ugly and unethical."                - Nietzsche 
---------------------------------------------------------------
My opinions are not necessarily shared by Northern Telecom/BNR. 
---------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: killer@robin.cs.hut.fi (Kalle Kivimaa)
Subject: Re: Rules-question
Keywords: Rules,kick-off
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, CS lab
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 11:02:54 GMT

In <4334@svin09.info.win.tue.nl> yvesv@wsooti10.info.win.tue.nl (Yves v.d. Vijver) writes:
>fell in the N-zone. My question is: what happens if the ball had gone
>between the posts? Is it a fieldgoal ?

No.  You can score a field goal with a scrimmage kick or a free kick
after a fair catch.  Thus, a touchback.
--
************************************************************************
* The night sky over the planet Krikkit is the least interesting sight *
* in the entire Universe.  -- Douglas Adams, HHGTG                     *
************************************************************************
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: AFC-Daydreams
Date: 7 Oct 92 19:04:28 GMT
Article-I.D.: plains.21039
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network



After the Bills were up on a 4-0 start, we could hear all the
Bills fans screaming all over the net and asking to bring in
the "Fish". Now after the Dolphins have upset the Bills( It
is only one game), the Dolfans are now out for blood of the
Bills' fans.  After these victories over each other, some of
the fans have already started envisioning Super-Bowl victories
.  It is a personal right to dream, but not to become blind.

Occassionally, these AFC teams run into some mighty NFC teams
as part of their regular season schedule and are rendered a
thorough spanking and these fans
 come out of their stupor: See the 30-0
rout of the Broncos by the Eagles.

But the blind fans do not learn and are back into their cocoon
when their team beats up another weak AFC rival and the day
dreaming starts all over again. It is just like the proverbial
ostrich burying its head in the sand: If I cannot see others,
no one else can see me.

After seeing the Eagles perform, I ask, Is there any AFC-team
which can take on the Eagles when it counts. No offence, I just
cannot see a single AFC team having the credentials.

S.H
Go Vikes!!  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: drhall1@pbhya.PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall)
Subject: Re: Miami Dolphins
Reply-To: drhall1@PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 16:56:02 GMT

In article <Bvu1zI.6vC@acsu.buffalo.edu> v073pzuy@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Mr. Tinkertrain) writes:
>In article <1992Oct8.162506.18073@ntmtv>, weitzeka@ntmtv.UUCP writes...
>>In article <Bvs8u8.JxI@acsu.buffalo.edu> v130pwbq@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu 
>	(ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
>>>Here is the Miami Dolphin schedule. Along side each game a have placed a number.
>>>1 - should have no problem winning, 2 - should win/could be close,
>>>D 14 LA Raiders       (1) 
>
>>   The Raiders on Monday night and Miami is going to win with no
>>problems? I don't think so.  The Raiders have the Dolphins number.
>>I cannot remember when the last time that the Dolphins beat the
>>Raiders in regular season.  The Raiders are always tough on
>>Monday night.  Hopefully, the Dolphins will do as you and look
>>past the Raiders, then the Raiders will go to Maimi and crush
>>the unexpecting Dolphans.
>
>Hell, I can't remember the last time the Dolphins *played* the Raiders during
>the regular season!

The last time I remember was 1973 when the Raiders ended the Dolphins win
streak that had extended from their perfect season of 1972. I can't remember
if it was a pre-season game or one of the first couple of games of the season.
The final score was 12 to 9 (I think). It wasn't played at the Coliseum. It 
was played at U.C. Berkeley because of the A's in the playoffs or World
Series. It was a great defensive battle. I was there sitting in the stands at
the 48 yard line.

Maybe, Doug the Dolfan has the details???

>I don't remember the Chiefs having many problems with the Raiders on Monday
>night either, for that matter...

The other Raider fan was following up to his arguement that the Raiders have 
a tough Monday Night football schedule. I know some people don't put any 
stock in long stats like this, but when it comes to putting your money where
your mouth is gamblers stop and think about it.

A Raider fan

>
>>A die hard Raider fan
>>I bleed silver and black
>
>					---Chet Zeshonski
From: mocnik@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Browns News - late roster moves
Date: 10 Oct 92 10:10:49 EST

Browns News - Roster changes
-----------------------------
1. Kevin Mack, as expected has been activated from the IR List.

2. Frank Stamms, LB, also has been activated from the IR.

3. Keenan McCardall, WR, has been signed from the practice squad.

4. Bobby Abrams, LB, is the player the Browns signed, who used to play for
   the Giants and Cowboys.

5. Pete Holohan, TE, was placed on IR with a foot injury.

6. Tom Myslinski, OG, was waived.
   - also James Brooks, Jamis Holland, and Jeff Francis were waived last week.

7. Eddie Murray, PK, has gotten a tryout with the team. Eddie is the former
   Lion kicker. It seems Matt Stover has a groin muscle problem. 
   The injury is not too serious, but it is bothersome. Matt has been able to
   practice with the injury. 
   The Browns have until 4pm today (saturday) to decide if they want to sign
   Eddie for tomorrows game.
   {NFL rule says all rosters must be set by then for tomorrows games}

8. Also by that time, the Browns may decide to activate Frank Minnifield. It
   seems Frank's problem seems to be under control. There is some concern if
   Frank is in playing shape though. 

9. If Frank or Eddie are activated, other players will have to go.
   - possibly Shawn Collins to the IR list. (Ribs still a problem)
   - possibly Alvin Wright  (too many defensive lineman)

10. Finally the weather for tomorrow's game is Cool, cloudy and a chance of
    afternoon rain. Ideal Pittsurgh-Cleveland football weather.

    Browns starters on offense are:
    - Tomczak (QB)
    - Vardell and Metcalf (RB)
    - Bavaro (TE)
    - Tony Jones, Rienstra, Hilgenberg, King, and Childress (Lineman)
    - Michael Jackson and Rico Smith (WR) - this is Rico's first start.

    backups are
    - Brad Goebel (QB)
    - Hoard, Mack, Baldwin, and Wolfley (RB)
    - Dan Fike, Chris Thome (lineman)
    - Galbraith and Kinchen (TE)
    - McCardall and Shawn Collins (WR)

    Defensive starters:
    - Burnett, Perry, James Jones, Pleasant (lineman)
    - Matthews, Johnson, and Brandon (LB)
    - Taylor, Wilburn, Turner, and Newsome (secondary)

    backups are:
    - Sagapoulete, Ernie Logan, Bill Johnson and Alvin Wright (lineman)
    - Figero, Stamms, Bobby Abrams and Richard Browns (LB)
    - Harlon Barnett, Stevon Moore, Randy Hilliard, and Alfred Jackson (DB)

    - punter - Brian Hansen
    - kicker - Matt Stover


Later,

Don Mocnik
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bderolf@encore.com (Brad DeRolf)
Subject: Levy must go?
Reply-To: bderolf@encore.com (Brad DeRolf)
Organization: Encore Computer Corp
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 14:45:20 GMT
Summary: Get real
News-Software: NN 6.4.16
Keywords: NFL coaches


This unbelievable thread about Levy. I've heard the same crap about Shula.

My 1st question always is: Who would you replace him with? 
Who has a better track record than Levy? Buffalo hadn't done crap till
he got there. 

I am quite happy about Levy taking Dean S. away from the Dolphin's Defensive
line though. Shula picking up "Mean" Joe Greene and Dwight Stevenson to
coach the defensive and offensive lines was a real plus in my book.
But other than that how much can you fault Levy? He still needs better
defense (coaching maybe?). On Miami's 1st drive on the second half, Miami 
committed something like 4 penalties and still converted 1st downs. Any quality
defense does not give TDs on drives where the offense commits 4 or more
penalties.

Something else angry Buffalo Fans ought to think about. The NFL is very tight
and luck decides the real close games. Wide by 6 inches could have just as
easily been inside the upright and Buffalo would have taken one home for the
AFC. Of course they wouldn't have made it back to the Super Bowl because
the fire would be gone.

Miami .vs. Buffalo last week. Miami facing 3rd and 16, Marino to Banks,
Banks tips the ball 4 yards short of the marker and Clayton hauls it in
for a 1st down. An INT and we might have a different script. It was only 17-10
at that point.


My twenty cents worths.

Just Happy the Fins are almost always in the game and are part of the
BIG picture this year. NO INJURIES, PLEASE!

Go Fins.
Go Canes.
Heat adds Salley and Baby Jordan!!!
Marlins.
From: AMY105@psuvm.psu.edu (kate the great)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Eagles: sports illustrated's latest jinx?
Date: 9 Oct 92 18:52:50 GMT
Article-I.D.: psuvm.92283.145250AMY105
Organization: Penn State University


     I just read in the paper yesterday that Randall Cunningham is on the
front of Sports Illustrated for Monday night's performance.  According to
the article, the magazine is pretty notorious for jinxing whoever they put
on the cover.  The one I am particularly aware of, and would care to forget,
was when Lenny Dykstra was on the front and then proceeded to get hurt the
same week.   Let's hope this jinx is broken.

                                         --kate
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Call For Votes: Painful Death to All Premature Woofers
Date: 13 Oct 92 18:12:33 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

> 
> 	Section X: Death to Woofers.
> 
> 		Anyone who proclaims quite loudly that their team is the 
> 		undisputed best team in existence, or that they will kick 
> 		every other team's butt any day of the week, or that they 
> 		will obviously go 16-0, BEFORE said team has even gone 8-0,
> 		will be drawn, quartered, shot, dismembered, diced, dissolved
> 		in acid and then taken to be tortured.
> 
> 
> -Chundarr the Net.Terrorist,
>  And his Friendly Dog, Gunthor.

                  I hope your suggestion is accepted, because the fins
fans will be the only ones who will have a license to woof this year.

                               -doug THE dolfan-
From: tech@donald.cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Apology - take foot out mouth :-)
Date: 12 Oct 92 16:52:10 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.1992Oct12.165210.20554
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando

In article <1992Oct12.032842.244@ncar.ucar.edu> gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) writes:
>
>  My acceptance of your "apology" is pending. Let's see you grow up and make
>  some reasoned arguments to dig yourself out of the hole you've made, then
>  I'll take you seriously, and not as just some random asshole.
>
>--
>Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
>strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF

Well this is a grown up and reasoned response to a public apology.
Well gary, no one has ever called you random.

Tony (go new england) Travaglini
tech@cs.ucf.edu
From: dickh@tribe.esd.sgi.com (Dick Harkness)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Browns News - 1st qtr review - Steeler preview
Date: 12 Oct 92 19:52:49 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

I
|> >   Final score: Pitts - 17  Cleveland - 20 on a last second Stover field goal.
|> >
|> (Pages and pages of mindless ramblings and crap about the browns deleted.)
|> 
|> Why don't you smell what you're shoveling.  The browns don't stand a chance
|> against the STEELERS.  To paraphrase Dave:
|> 
|>  "The Steelers are going to chew them up and shit them out browner than their
|>  name suggests."
|
Guess the steelers had a bad case of constipation on Sunday...or was it hemorrhoids...?

Dick Harkness
From: zjsg12@hou.amoco.com (Jeffry S. Gracey)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: JGH computer rankings - week 7
Date: 13 Oct 92 21:30:01 GMT
Reply-To: zjsg12@hou.amoco.com
Organization: Amoco

I'd have to disagree with rating the Chiefs over the Oilers, even after the victory over the Eagles. I was at the Oilers/Chiefs game and the Oilers looked like a much better team. They should have won a lot easier.
	
As far the Redskins - as usual , they look good in 1 MNF game and everybody thinks they are back. Settle down folks - they're weak.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: klbartle@david.wheaton.edu (Kevin Bartlett)
Subject: Re: Thoughts on yesterday's games
Organization: Wheaton College, IL
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 21:18:55 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.220345.17997@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com> marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com writes:
>In article <1992Oct5.193848.29889@eplrx7.es.duPont.com>, walker@eplrx7.es.duPont.com (Scott Walker) writes:
>>1.  How about that TD run by Steve Young?  He really faked out a few
>>    defensemen and left them standing cold.  This guy looks like he
>>    might give Randall a challenge for the nickname "Scrambler".
>
>Even as a 49er fan, I still have to admit that Randall is probably a
>better overall quarterback. But no QB is better at running the ball
>than Steve Young. He may be the best running quarterback of all time.
>I just wish he wouldn't carry the ball with one hand as much as he
>does; one of these days (if anyone can get close enough) he's going
>to get his arm chopped or get the ball punched and he's going to lose it.

Wait.  Isn't Randall's running ability what makes him such a threat?  Not only
can he throw the ball, but when pressured, he can run it in (as he showed on
MNF).  

Just a thought.

					. . . the Mantis

Randall Cunningham for president.
Go EAGLES!
From: schy@rtsg.mot.com (Michael A. Schy)
Subject: Re: shortest player?
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 20:39:26 GMT

In article <718930919snx@smok.demon.co.uk> richard@smok.demon.co.uk (Richard Clyne) writes:
>
>In article <BvMutF.9st@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> bubba@mace.cc.purdue.edu writes:
>
>>
>>Who is the current Shortest Man in the NFL?  I think we should salute
>>such courageous fellas . . . .
>>
>>

Too bad Flutie is not in the NFL anymore, he was about 4' 11" and had
to stand on a milk crate to throw over his linemen.  Even on a milk
crate, he is more mobile than Bernie Kosar.

Just wait until Tomczak realizes what color uniforms his teammates wear,
then the interception count will start to soar.

-- 
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Mike Schy                 mikes%isdgsm@rtsg.mot.com
Motorola Cellular GSM     Disclaimer:  The sun's not yellow, it's chicken
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: UPSET PICK!!!!!!!
Date: 13 Oct 92 21:48:53 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <92822@netnews.upenn.edu>, mckernan@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Robert L Mckernan) writes:
> 
> 	THE UPSET PICK OF THE COMING WEEK:
> 
> 
> 	(0-5)NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS... 21
>         (5-0)MIAMI DOLPHINS......... 16
> 
> 	PATRIOTS ALWAYS GIVE MARINO FITS AND THEY ARE DUE FOR A WIN. THEY
> LET YOUNG & co. ESCAPE WITH A WIN BUT THEY WON'T LET UP THIS WEEK. COACH
> MAC WILL HAVE HIS TROOPS FIRED UP.
> 
> 			ROB

               This would be an even bigger upset than Miami over Buffalo
in Buffalo. I think Miami's first (and only) loss will come from SF or NO.
(in the regular season). Here's praying for 18-1 and SB victory #3.

                                       -doug THE dolfan-
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: brianc@acuson.com (Brian Cox)
Subject: Re: Request game summary: Wash. v. Phoenix
Organization: Acuson; Mountain View, California
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 22:12:11 GMT

mzener@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:

>   Would anyone be kind enough to tell me just what th' @#&%@$#!!! happened in
>the Redskins - Cardinals game?  I wasn't able to see it, and the final score
>absolutely mystified me.

>   Thanks ahead of time.

>Max


Well, I don't have a complete description, but here's a thumbnail sketch...

Rypien had 3 TD's, but 2 were to the wrong team in the 4th quarter.

After leading 24-6 going into the 4th quarter they blew the lead and
allowed Phoenix to score on their final drive.  They came back with
a _brilliant_ play to Byner that gave Lohmiller a shot at a 40 yarder
(money in the bank... except this year... go figure!) to tie, which
he missed.  An all-around letdown.


		A Redskin's fan who still might believe in Ryp.


-- 

					   --Brian Cox--
------------------

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Re: Dolphins vs. Raiders
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 18:43:26 GMT

rwturner@IASTATE.EDU (Richard W Turner) writes:
>   Are there any other cases of a team never winning a game against another?
>   I also think the Giants are 1 - 1  overall against Miami.  It seems some

Yes, when they met two years ago (Giants won 20-3) it was the first time
since 1972.

In the current system, every AFC division plays every NFC division
once in three years; but in 5-team divisions, if you finish in fifth
place you just play the 5th-place teams from the other conference.
So, if you miss a turn, you often wait 3 more years.  Of course, if
both teams finish fifth they'll play each other anyway.

So let's see:
1990 -- Giants win.
1987 -- supposed to play in week 3 at Miami, wiped out by strike
1984 -- the Giants finished 1983 in fifth place, Miami in first
1981 -- the Giants finished 1980 in fifth place, Miami in third
1978, 1975 -- I dunno.
1972 -- Miami won


--Gidi
From: 00jcreidy@bsu-ucs.uucp
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Another Jets Victory
Date: 8 Oct 92 21:59:12 GMT
Reply-To: rec.sport.football.pro

Are there really that many crazy people out there?  There is no way in hell
that the Jets will beat the Colts 42-7, or whatever.  Nor will they beat 
the Colts 30-7, as other proponents suggest.  In fact, the Jets will 
get the crap beat out of them to the tune of 24-7!  The Jets just beat 
New England and now people thinking all these really stupid stuff.
Go Colts!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jeffr@ssec.wisc.edu (Jeff Ramin)
Subject: Re: Eagles Class Acts ... NOT!
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Space Science and Engineering Center
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 18:26:13 GMT

In article <1b4b7lINNdks@uwm.edu>, paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger) writes:
|> In article <92309@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
|> >- Aikman's shoes come off. The nice Iggles DE picks it up and then tosses it
|> >  away.
|> >- The O line is called for false-start. Nice Clyde Simmons starts clapping in
|> >  their faces.
|> >- And oh who could ever forget Andre Waters' (surprise) knack for getting into
|> >  tiffs with the bad Cowboys.
|> >
|>    To all three of these things, I say big deal! Jeez, name one team that has a
|>    D lineman who would see the shoe, pick it up and say "Here you are Mr.      
|>    Aikman, I hope we haven't inconvenienced you tonight." 
|> 
|>    I'd also like to see any team with a D lineman who wouldn't get on the case
|>    of a O lineman who jumped offsides. This is football, not tiddly winks.
|>    Intimidation is a big part of the game.
|> 
|>    As for Waters, every team has a guy who instigates his share of fights. I've
|>    seen Dallas' Bates get into quite a few.        

I agree with these responses except for the one immediately above.  Waters is
probably the dirtiest cheap shot artist in the NFL.  He has an attitude problem
which transcends being aggressive on the playing field.  Too many times I've seen
him intentionally go for another players knees.  If the NFL had any kind of 
reasonable fine amounts, Waters wouldn't have a dime to his name.

|> 
|>    Satish, aren't you a Giants fan? If you are, you should know first-hand of
|>    incidents like these happening every week with LT and the Giants used-to-be
|>    great defense. I guess since the Eagles are kicking everyone's ass, the
|>    rest of the NFC East fans are really mad. Still, these idiotic "Dallas had
|>    bad luck," and "Philly has mean players," posts are getting ridiculous.
|> 
|>    --salty
|> 
|> 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro