HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nlatif@stipple.seas.upenn.edu (Wolverine)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles vs Redskins
Date: 15 Dec 92 03:21:44 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Dec14.233152.824@athena.mit.edu> centry@athena.mit.edu (Jae H Nam) writes:
>
>Loss   Washington   (away)
>Win    Pheonix      (home)
>Loss   Dallas       (away)
>Win    L.A. Raiders (home)
>Loss   Green Bay    (away)
>Win    N.Y. Giants  (home)
                     ^^^^^^
This should read (away). 

>Loss   San Fran.    (away)
>Win    Minnesota    (home)
>Win(OT)Seattle      (away)  <- broke jinx?
>???    Washington   (home)
>
>Anyway, call it a hunch, I think we'll beat Washington.
>Prediction:  	Eagles 27
>		Redskins 17

If the Eagles win this Sunday's game, they will clinch the playoff berth 
(according to the Daily News) even though the 'Skins won their last game 
against the Raiders 'cause the Eagles will have a better conference record. The
Packers will need to go 2-0 and hope that the Vikes will lose both games to win
the Div. in order to be in the playoffs. They cant afford a tie with the 'Skins
since the 'Skins will win the tie-breaker. If however, the Eagles were to lose
to the 'Skins, then they must hope that the Packs will win the Div title and 
the Eagles will win the tie-breaker with the Vikes to grab the third spot. 
This is what I can clearly see but correct me if Im wrong. 

GO EAGLES!!!
 


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Vikes cannot hope for a wild card.
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 19:45:50 GMT

In article <1gl1icINN2sk@uwm.edu> caeser@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Robert Michael Trotter) writes:
>>So, if the vikes dont win a game then they aint going to the playoffs.
>
>	GOD, if they cant win another game, they DONT deserve the PLAYOFFS.
What about this "can't win another game, DONT deserve ..." nonsense? I
have heard it about the Redskins too (can't beat Dallas, don't deserve to
be in the playoffs).

Remember 1987? The Vikings were 7-4 and at very good shape. They went
on to lose 3 out of the last 4, including an OT loss to the Skins in the
season finale, and finished at 8-7. In the last weekend, had the Cardinals 
beaten the Cowboys, the Cards would have edged out the Vikings in a 
tiebreaker. Yet the Cards lost, and the Vikings backed into the playoffs.

The Vikes certainly didn't deserve it, right?

The rest is history.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
From: v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dominant Teams of the Nineties (add one more)
Date: 18 Dec 92 20:07:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <102355@netnews.upenn.edu>, satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes...
> 
>Here's who I see dominating over the next decade:
> 
>Cowboys- they're young and talented.  Very little holes to fill.
>Steelers- they need some help at WR, maybe another pass rusher but otherwise
>	  should be strong for a while.
>San Fran- so what else is new?
>Minnesota- some help on the O line, a decent QB and they're set.
>Packers- another WR to compliment Sharpe, some help with the O line.
> 
>This doesn't include major overhauls resulting from coaching changes (like
>with the case of the Vikings this year).
> 
>Anyone like to add to this?

Yeah, how about the Buffalo Bills, after all they have gone to
more Superbowls in the 90's than any other team.  Also they look
like they are going to their third straight Superbowl, knock on
wood.

Bruce, a Bills fan.

> 
> 
>satish nair
>giants (5-11 in '92)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes)
Subject: 3220
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:47:57 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NARC Atlanta
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1.3 PL5
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Home field in the NFC
Date: 13 Dec 92 23:33:16 GMT
Organization: Pacific * Bell

In article <1992Dec13.235928.1@vxcrna.cern.ch> bonvicin@vxcrna.cern.ch writes:
>Wuth today's 49ers victory, it seems very likely that the 9ers will be home
>thru the playoffs. Last two games are home against lowly Tampa and Detroit.
>
>Watch for Joe (to the guy who posted 80 times "Joe who?", Montana) to start
>one more game, Musgrave has been told he is injuried. Likely next week so
>that Steve does not get too rusty with three weeks without a game.
>
>As most 9ers fans I know, the Saints are the last team I want to meet.
>This year, though, the NFC field is as deep as I have ever seen it, all 
>six teams (I assume Philly and 'skins are in) have a shot at the SB.
>Does anyone know if the 9ers can have Minnesota in their first home
>game? That would be better...
>
>It is possible that the 9ers are not much better this year than last year,
>but certainly the breaks they got this year are enough to balance those of
>last year. Should home-field turn out to be important (and it may well be),
>I guess we can forget what happened lat year.
>
>G. Bonvicini
>BONVICIN@CERNVM.CERN.CH

IF the Niners healthy on both sides of the line, it is unlikely 
that they can be stopped.  Watters injured, hell we have Amp Lee! 
The Saints are awesome, but get weak knees playing the Niners. The
Cowboys are impressive! Bottom Line: the NFC will kick ass
in SB!  The AFC might as wll forfeit. :-)
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
	"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
  is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Sunday, 13 Dec 1992 21:53:43 MST
From: <IADGLC@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!

In article <1992Dec11.222313.1906@csc.ti.com>, rscott@ra.csc.ti.com (Roderick
Scott) says:
>
>Michael Irvin Has Stated He Is After To Re-Injury Green's Broken Arm...
>
After Irvin's crucial fumble today, maybe he'll learn to carry the ball in his
big mouth next time. And how sweet it was that Green knocked the ball loose
with his broken arm.
But it was fun to see the Skins-Boys game mean more than it has in years -- to
both teams, especially since the Skins lost. Credit to Troy Aikman, too, who
ade no excuses and recognized that the Cowboys failed to pull the trigger
when they had the gun to the Skins heads, more than once. Way to go, Skins!
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Vikings + Gannon = Suck!
Date: 15 Dec 92 15:18:15 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <Bz9GwG.1D4@bcstec.ca.boeing.com> mtw8527@bcstec.ca.boeing.com (Mike Wallach) writes:
>After watching another pathetic performance by Gannon I was
>wondering, has there been any talk of the Vikings signing
>one of the available free agent QB's or if they're looking
>to draft a talented QB?  Sure Gannon can scramble but
>that's about it.  If Rich Gannon is the Vikes QB of the
>future, they have no future.
>
>As a diehard Vikings fan, it has always mystified me, no
>matter who the owners are, that the Vikings have this mindset
>about selecting second-rate, minor star quarterbacks in the
>draft and try to convince the fans they are chocked full of
>potential (Kramer, Wilson, Gannon, etc)  Tark was the only
>legitimate star QB the Vikes have had.


Kind of ironic that the day that Gannon put in a pretty miserable
performance, Wade Wilson threw for over 300 yards and scored 5
touchdowns.

Oh, Gannon is out next week and Salisbury is back in according to
Denny Green.

Also, Kramer was a pretty decent QB from what I'd seen.

satish nair
bitter & twisted giants fan

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: The Dynasty Continues..........
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 01:41:03 GMT

In article <1992Dec18.212145.14151@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>Well, you see, Ed likes to "prove" arguments by stating the opposite..
>That is, unless you can prove it to NOT be true, then it must be true...
>He has been doing it for years on a variety of groups..  
Yes, you see, Meek like to pick up arguments with me that at least he has 
some allies, like in r.s.p.football.pro. He is still smarting at all the 
flame wars in the other groups that he had to wimp out after arguing 
for months ....

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
From: mlsa@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MICHAEL LAUREN SHERMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The Dynasty Continues..........
Date: 19 Dec 92 18:51:35 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1gth45INNq1v@seven-up.East.Sun.COM>, djd@agent99.Eng.Sun.COM (Dave D
amkoehler - Sun BOS Editor) writes:
>In article <1992Dec18.211409.25147@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (
edward.lor) writes:
>>This has been discussed already in r.s.p.basketball.pro. For every
>>legend you name in the 60s, there are always matching legends in
>>the 80s.
>>
>
>I'll take this as a challenge. Pick any team of the 80s or 90s, and
>demonstrate that it includes a player at every position equal to the
>following:
>
>
>
>               1966 Packers            80's- 90's Skins
>               ^^^^^^^^^^^^            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Quarterback:   Bart Starr           Ok Joe Theisman
>
>Running Back:  Paul Hornung           Riggo (They ran the one back)
>               Jim Taylor             Byner
>
>O-Line:                Jim Ringo       The Hogs
                                        Jacoby
>               Jerry Kramer            Starke
>               Forrest Gregg           Warren
                                        Bostic
>               Fuzzy Thurston          Lachey.
>
>Wide Receiver: Max McGee               Monk
>               Boyd Dowler             Sanders
>               Carroll Dale            Clark
>
>Tight End:     Marv Fleming            Don Warren (or Didier to receive)
>
>D-line:                Willie Davis    Dave Butz
>               Lionel Aldridge         Dexter Manley
>               Henry Jordan            Charles Mann
>               Bob Brown               Jumpy Geathers
>
>Linebacker:    Ray Nitschke            Wilbur Marshall
>               Dave Robinson           Andre Collins
>               Leroy Caffey            Neal Olkewicz
>
>D-Back:                Herb Adderly    Darryl Green
>               Willie Wood             Martin Mayhew (Deion's other cb at fsu)
>               Bob Jeter               Danny Copeland and Brad Edwards
>
>Head Coach:    Vince Lombardi          Joe Gibbs
>
>
>(I list these players from memory only---but it's fairly complete.)
>
>Dave
>
 Note, I compiled the Skins list from their 82 superbowl through to last years
 superbowl, I can not for the life of me remember who left when, If the packer
 guy would like to expand his list I invite him to.


 
-- 
my name is mike and i'm a .sig-a-holic, i have been virtually .sig free for
ten days now, my life is so much clearer, i pledge to do my best to never
have a long .sig again.  i don't need one because i'm good enough, i'm smart
enough and god darnit, people like me.  ob info: mlsa@lehigh.edu, mike
sherman phone# 758-0207 disclaimer, we don't neeeed no steeenking disclaimer.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: john@ice.stx.com (John DiMarzio)
Subject: Re: WILDCARDS, READ THIS!
Reply-To: john@ice.stx.com
Organization: Hughes STX, Lanham, MD
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 18:06:55 GMT

In article <11543@sun13.scri.fsu.edu>, debry@dirac.scri.fsu.edu (Ron DeBry) writes:
}In article 1@pembvax1.pembroke.edu,  harper@pembvax1.pembroke.edu writes:
}>In article <Bz9q53.B9B@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, nrau@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Nicholas Naveen Rau) writes:
}[...]
}>Also, picture this.  If (big IF) Washington Wins the next two and Dallas
}>lossess its next two (its possible) .  They will both have a 11-5 record, so
}>who will win the Division?  Could be very interesting!
}
}
}Well, since Dallas has yet to clinch the division title, I'd have to
}guess that Washington would win in this scenario.
}

Washington has no chance of a division title.  If Dallas looses their
last two and the Skins win their last two, Dallas has the better division
record.  The reason that Dallas hasn't clinched is Philly.  They could
win the division with 2 wins (possible) and two Dallas losses (unlikely).

John DiMarzio
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!)
Subject: Re: all SB winner
Organization: Yale University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 14:30:08 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.154755.4538@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> lhsux@swingset.bae.bellcore.com (Lorne Schachter) writes:
>From: lhsux@swingset.bae.bellcore.com (Lorne Schachter)
>Subject: Re: all SB winner
>Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 15:47:55 GMT
>In article <1992Dec15.155048@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de>, death@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Markus Kalb) writes:
>|> 
>|> 
>|> XXVI	26.1.92	 Washington	- Buffalo	37:24	Minneapolis 63.130
>|> XXV	27.1.91	 N.Y. Giants	- Buffalo	20:19	Tampa	    73.813
>|> XXIV	28.1.90  San Francisco  - Denver	55:10	New Orleans 72.919
>|> XXIII	22.1.89	 San Francisco  - Cincinnati	20:16	Miami	    75.129
>|> XXII	31.1.88  Washington	- Denver	42:10	San Diego   73.302
>|> XXI	25.1.87  N.Y. Giants	- Denver	39:20	Pasadena   101.063
 
>|> 
>|> 	Bye Markus (death/NHawk)
>|> 
>|> 	e-mail : death@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
>There's an interesting statistic that I noticed when the Giants went to
>the Super Bowl for the second time:
>
>	Any team that won its first Super Bowl appearance has never
>	lost a Super Bowl:
>
>		Green Bay	(2-0)
>		NY Jets		(1-0)
>		Pittsburgh	(4-0)
>		San Francisco	(4-0)
>		Chicago		(1-0)
>		NY Giants	(2-0)
>
>This accounts for 14 of the 25 (at the time, 26 now) Super Bowls.  I don't
>know what it means, but it seems interesting.
>
>					Lorne Schachter

Its things like this that keep me hanging on as a Giants fan.  God knows I 
have few reasons these days, but I know in a few years WE'LL BE BACK.

P.S.  Can we all remain a little more civilized than we have lately.  The 
next time you feel the urge to type YOU ARE A <insert-nasty-name-here>
please take it off line.  Please.

-ALN
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Jimmy Johnson: Love em or hate em, he's a winner (and a whiner)
Date: 16 Dec 92 17:00:24 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Dec16.162302.18032@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes:
>	{STUFF ABOUT JIMMY JOHNSON'S LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM DELETED}
>
>
>JJ is not a man, he's a crybaby.
>
>-- 
>                                          Edward Lor
>                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
>                                          


Along these lines, anyone remember the game back on Thanksgiving Day when
the Cowboys were called for being offsides. JJ yelled at the official for
a few minutes then (this is true folks) actually started jumping up and
down like a little kid... I thought it was pretty funny.

(Note: this is not meant as a flame on the Cowboys)

satish nair
bitter & twisted giants fan


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
Subject: Whiners, NOT the NINERS
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 05:10:08 GMT

The Niners are 12-2 and lead the NFL. We now have a bunch
of net whiners crying about bad calls, fumbles, stupid
QBs, stupid head coaches, breaks, and luck, etc.  I can
guarantee you that if the Niners would have lost and
the Cowboys would have WON, the net would have been
flooded by net.idiotic like FRANK and GORDON rubbing
it in. Yet, when they lose, they have nothing but
excuses. Each time the Niners lost, I, the MAN that
I am, was one of the first on the net to say, the
best team won today. Period.

Each team/player will get their share of bad calls and
or calls go their ways. That is part of the equation out
there. The Hail Mary passes, the INTs, the fumble
recoveries, the great/lucky catches, the lousy officiating,
these are all part of the equation. The other part is
execution by the team/players. IF the SKINS DEFENSE had
NOT overpowered the Cowboys line when Aikman was in the
endzone, he would/could have either completed a pass or
had an incompletion. This brings up another point that
has not been mentioned. What the HELL was Aikman doing
passing from his ENDZONE! That was pure stupidty IMHO!

A delineation is made out there on the football field
that separates the wanna be's and the contenders.
The 'Boys fans would have been flooding the net waves
IF they would have won. Well, IN YOUR FACE! They lost 
to a lousy, pathetic team/QB. Well, I have news for
you, the NINERs are leagues in the opposite of lousy
and pathetic. Get a clue. 
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
	"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
  is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
From: ching@wpi.WPI.EDU (Jason R Heminger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Any Lions Fans out there?
Date: 16 Dec 1992 00:28:14 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
	Could somebody please tell me why Green is going to be suspended?
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu

A disgruntled Lions fan.

*******************************************************************************
*									      *
*			The Logistician reigns supreme!!!		      *
*									      *
*      GO BLUE!!   GO TIGERS!!   GO LIONS!!   GO PISTONS!!   GO RED WINGS!!   *
*									      *
*      		G  O    D  E  T  R  O  I  T  !  !			      *
*   									      *
*******************************************************************************


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: HOW BOUT EM!!
Keywords: nowworshipmoranow
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 03:55:30 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.162638.590@b8.b8.ingr.com> nelson@clunker.b21.ingr.com (nelson jordan) writes:

> Sounds like JJ wins this one. Mr. Zimmers is either:  (choose one)
>
>                         A. Blind
>                         B. Dumb
>                         C. 49ers fan
>                         D. All of the above

Blind?  A bit nearsighted, perhaps, but still have the visual acuity to
observe Hebert's coughs at QB.

Dumb?  Probably.  After all, I only predicted 11 Niner wins this season.

49er fan?  You bet.  Why root for a team that's still a postseason virgin?

But go ahead and give the win to JJ.  In a few weeks, he won't have any
more coming his way...



-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit)
Subject: Re: Jimmy Johnson: Love em or hate em, he's a winner (and a whiner)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:39:25 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes:

>In article <1gq3flINN1h9@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds) writes:
>JJ and the Boys are:  0
>Gibbs and the Skins are: 3

>Guess what those numbers are.

Seasons which are history. 

				-Ron

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 16:00:07 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kennedy@asuvax.eas.asu.edu (Ralph Kennedy)
Subject: Re: Cost of Season Tickets?
Organization: Arizona State Univ, Tempe
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 18:48:31 GMT


     Phoenix Cardinals prices.  A season, of course,
is eight regular season games plus two preseason games,
for a total of ten games.

      Single        Season           Location
      ------        ------           --------
      not avail.    don't ask        skybox

       200           1800            50 yd. line loge shade
       200           1600            50 yd. line loge sunny

       100            900            sideline loge shade
       100            800            sideline loge sunny

        60            540            endzone loge

        50            450            best sideline shade
        50            400            best sideline sunny

        35            315            not as good sideline shade
        35            280            not as good sideline sunny

        20            180            North endzone and marginal sideline

        15            135            South endzone bleachers

--Ralph Kennedy      {ames,gatech,husc6,rutgers}!ncar!noao!asuvax!kennedy
                        {allegra,decvax,ihnp4,oddjob}--^
                                          ^---------------The Wrong Choice
                             internet: kennedy@asuvax.asu.edu
From: vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: A Saints Fan's view on the playoffs.
Date: 14 Dec 92 03:00:15 EST
Organization: The Ohio State University, Department of Physics

In article <Bz8ID4.7K3@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, nrau@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Nicholas Naveen Rau) writes:
> Well, here it is, my entrance into the football conf. and frankly from the
> lack of New Orleans fans around here, I think it is needed.  For an 11 - 3
> team they are vastly undersupported here.
> 

I agree. What's the problem with NO? No "NO pun intended (infinite loop)"
students in LA (NO, Not LA :) with computer accounts :) :)

Just say NO!

[...]

> Maybe it is do to my feeling that the Saints will be more than a bye in the
> playoffs this year.
> 
> GEAUX SAINTS.
> 
> 

I tell you, I'm a Browns fan, but having always having had sympathy for the
underDAWG, I always rooted for the 'Aint's. Well, here they are!

-Garrett



B R O W N S B R O W N S B R O W N S B R O W N S B R O W N S B R O W N S


GO BROWNS!  (OK, maybe year :)






Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro