HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Gan's Death
Date: 26 Aug 92 19:27:41 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <25201@castle.ed.ac.uk> asr@castle.ed.ac.uk (Angus "Fluffy" Rae) writes:
>I think I have everything in the right order there. There are obvious
>reasons for Gan's death; 1) The character was "limited" too much by the
>limiter implant, 2) Orac was just too good a character to lose - he
>would become part of the crew without doubt and "Blake's Eight" just
>doesn't have the same ring to it, and 3) the actor was reportedly not
>happy. 

Actually, according to Vere Lorrimer, the reason they killed off Gan was
because the show was getting too "safe" because you always knew that the
heroes would escape intact from whatever situation they were in.  They
wanted to REALLY surprise people.  Gan just happened to be the character
whose death would least affect the dynamic of the crew.  He was expendable.

A very Federation-like way of looking at it, if you ask me...
From: adrian@cs.hw.ac.uk (Adrian Hurt)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Blake's 7 Ending
Date: 3 Sep 92 09:35:25 GMT
Organization: Dept of Computing & Electrical Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Scotland


Here is my favourite explaination of that episode.  It's not meant to be
accurate, it's meant to preserve the sanity of the true Blake's 7 fans who,
after seeing the ending, may wonder whether life is worth continuing. :-)

In article <1992Sep2.204300.21375@netcon.cua.edu> ramsey@cua.edu (Betsy Ramsey) writes:
>Spoilers for "Blake", the last episode of BLAKES 7.

>No, you saw what you were supposed to see: Avon shoots Blake, Arlen
>shoots Deva and Dayna, Soolin and Tarrant shoot a couple of Federation
>guards, Federation guards shoot Vila, Soolin and Tarrant, Avon stands
>over Blake's body, raises his gun, smiles, the picture freezes and you
>hear gunfire.

These are the same Federation guards who previously had trouble hitting
people even in a crowded room.  Note that usually, when someone was hit
by such a guard, you usually saw a puff of smoke showing where they had
been hit.  No such puffs appeared on our heroes.  So:

Avon shoots Blake.  (Definite hit - quite messy.)
Various people shoot at Our Heroes, who duck, fall and pretend to be
unconscious.
Avon stands, surrounded by Federation guards, all pointing their guns at
him.  He raises his gun, fires one shot, and ducks quickly.  Exit a lot
of Federation guards.
:-) ;-)

-- 
 "Keyboard?  How quaint!" - M. Scott

 Adrian Hurt			     |	JANET:  adrian@uk.ac.hw.cs
 UUCP: ..!uknet!cs.hw.ac.uk!adrian   |  ARPA:   adrian@cs.hw.ac.uk
From: baylor@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL: "A Little Miracle" <possible SPOILERS!>
Date: 4 Sep 92 17:36:45 GMT
Reply-To: baylor@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California

In article <!ayy3qk@rpi.edu>, dzembj@jec315.its.rpi.edu (Jason Eric Dzembo) writes:
>In article <wHJDqB22w165w@bluemoon.rn.com>, djredick@bluemoon.rn.com (Darrin J. Redick) writes:
>Spoilers (??) deleted...
>
>Acting-wise,
>|> pretty good, especially Charles Rocket, who is the only guest star to
>|> appear in more than one episdoe, I believe.  Correct me if I'm wrong on
>|> this one.
>Gladly.  :-)  Let's see...there's one, Someone Applegate (NOT Christina, from
>Married With Children, this one is a black male and I don't think CA could
>pull THAT off...;-), who was in The Color Of Truth, and a more recent one,
>I think, although, I can't remember which one.
>Also, Olivia Burnette played Sam's sister, Katie, in "The Leap Home," as 
>well as "his" daughter in "Another Mother."
[rest of list deleted for brevity]

What? Didn't you recognise Sam's Mom, who also appeared in 
"The Americanization of Machko" (as the sailor's mother)?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Yet Another Blake's 7 Question
From: mikew@mdcbbs.com (Mike 'the Bard' Whitaker)
Date: 28 Aug 92 05:33:57 PDT
Organization: Shape Data - a division of EDS Ltd

In article <JPR5PB4w164w@jab.tucson.az.us> barry@jab.tucson.az.us (Barry Mishkind) writes:
>chrstie@ccu.umanitoba.ca (William John M. Christie) writes:
>
>> Speaking of Soolin anyone have any information on this fast-drawing gunsling
>> babe?  Aside from the name Glynis Barber has she done any other BBC stuff or
>> appeared in any other media?
>
>You mean like  Dempsey and Makepeace? 

Glynis Barber played Harry (Harriet) Makepeace (think I got that right) in 
Dempsey and Makepeace.

She also played Jane in a BBC TV adaptation of the wartime strip (and I use
the term advisedly) cartoon of the same name...
-- 
Mike Whitaker +44-223 | mikew@mdcbbs.com, bard@spuddy.uucp | Me: Bards just
Shape Data/EDS 316673 | -or- mwhitaker@cix.compulink.co.uk | KNOW things...
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 17:08:11 EDT
From: <JAP8@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Blake's 7 Ending - SPOILERS
 <hoahosth.41.715451106@halls1.cc.monash.edu.au>

My memory's not so dim of the ending...'cos I have it on tape.  What happened
was that everyone else died, but the end of the show occurs after Avon holds up
the pistol and smiles...fade to black.  Theoretically, he is still alive. It's
still up in the air whether the other characters where actually dead or merely
tranked or stunned.  I think it's general consensus that Blake died in a kind
of permanent fashion ('cos he was the only character to have blood coming out
of his wounds).  Gareth Thomas wanted Blake dead forever so he got the makeup
people to go to extra lengths to make it look like he died.  Anyone else want
to speculate?
                            Cheers,
                            Jean
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.tv:2935 rec.arts.startrek.current:12241
From: tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: BABYLON 5: Rest of the Casting, First day of filming
Date: 14 Aug 92 22:12:29 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.sf.tv
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

jsciv@vtucs.cc.vt.edu writes:
>In article <1992Aug13.130011.13891@bnlux1.bnl.gov> schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:

>>I don't think that this continuing info update on B5 belongs on this
>>group, anyway.  This is not rec.arts.babylon5.current.  This is really a
>>shameless attempt to suck in the Trek crowd.  

>I disagree here.  I really think that this is the best place for updates 
>of this kind.  This show is definitely not Trek, but it IS a sf tv show,
>which fits perfectly in this group.  

I think you're both saying the same thing in two different groups.  Gary,
unless I *seriously* miss my guess, is saying this from rec.arts.startrek.
current, where I agree with him; "Babylon 5" news, while quite interesting,
is simply not appropriate to the group.  On the other hand, Joe is arguing
that rec.arts.sf.tv *is* appropriate; and he's also right, IMO.

Can we get some sort of agreement here, folks?

Tim Lynch 
BITNET:  tlynch@citjuliet
INTERNET:  tlynch@juliet.caltech.edu
UUCP:  ...!ucbvax!tlynch%juliet.caltech.edu@hamlet.caltech.edu
"Science is the only self-correcting human institution, but it also is a 
process that progresses only by showing itself to be wrong."
			--Allan Sandage
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: daw5g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Vertigo)
Subject: SF Channel Question
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 02:42:26 GMT

     I just returned to the net two days ago, so forgive me if
this has been beaten to death, but does anyone have a detailed
list of the shows that are definitely going to be on the sci-fi
channel?  I was hoping for Quark but I hear that won't happen.
--
From: eric_gorr@coglab_psych.uoregon.edu (Eric Gorr)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Mann & Machine
Date: 2 Sep 92 16:24:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: nntp.1992Sep2.162439.4192
Organization: University of Oregon Network Services

Probe was a good show.  Mann and Machine was not, IMHO.

In article <8198@dirac.physics.purdue.edu>,
millerbe@maxwell.physics.purdue.edu (Barry E. Miller) writes:
> 
> 
> 
> 	Does anyone have the first three Mann & Machine episodes on
> video?  I missed the first three shows, but caught the rest and was
> disappointed when it was canned. (They always can the good shows like
> Mann, or Probe!).
> 
> 	If someone could find me a copy of episode 1,2,3 of Mann I 
> would be thrilled.  PLease mail me at my email address.
> 
> 
> Barry Miller
> millerbe@maxwell.physics.purdue.edu
> 
> 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: mac7@po.CWRU.Edu (Michael A. Chary)
Subject: My Secret Identity question
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 92 22:30:20 GMT


Is this show dead?  I haven't seen it in ages.  If so, how did it
end?  If not, what's going on with it now?  
-- 
"Ipsa scientia potestas est."
             -Roger Bacon
"The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with
the average voter." -Winston Churchill
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Series on late night TV (TNT, KCET)
From: ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 13:03:36 PDT
Organization: Paradox Alley F&SF BBS 805-492-8789
Keywords: Red Dwarf, Logan's Run

ncc1701@madoka.its.rpi.edu (Mark O. Chadwick) writes:

> Hi, all,
> 
> I don't recall seeing this info, but for those fans of Red Dwarf, it's on
> KCET in southern California Tuesday-Friday mornings at 12:30 am (that's
> when it's dark :-).  I think it's currently in the 2nd season,
> but as I'm only a casual watcher, I'm not sure.  Get those VCR's ready! :-)

Nope sorry, as of yesterday, (Thursday, the 27th) KCET ending its run of
Red Dwarf.  They only showed season 3.  They do have season 4 and they
were going to show it last month.  But I called them on Tuesday and was
told "the have not reschedualed it as yet, and it isn't on the schedual
for September".  So who knows when we will get season 4.  And yes, my
VCR has been ready for quite some time to tape season 4 (I already have
1,2, and 3), waiting since January when it was available to US PBS
stations.  I could hold back pledging for this year, it probably
wouldn't help.



-------------------------------------------------------------------
Catherine Beckstead                    ace@kryton.uucp
"Do you want to argue with a can of deodorant that registers
NINE on the Richter scale?"        --Ace, in "Dragonfire"
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.tv:2989 rec.arts.tv:17211
From: lmathews@lonestar.utsa.edu (Leanthony R. Mathews)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Looking for rec.arts.tv.fiction
Date: 2 Sep 92 11:03:58 GMT
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio

I'm looking for the a group to post fan written fiction that is NOT
about Star Trek.  More like QL, Raven, even 90210.  Does such a group
exist?
If anybody out there has some good stuff written send me a copy.

I think this is a group we need. What do you think?
lmathews@lonestar.utsa.edu
From: baylor@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL: Donna (was Re: QL: Toronto Star Article Aug. 25, 1992)
Date: 28 Aug 92 22:11:32 GMT
Reply-To: baylor@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California

In article <1992Aug28.155131.5887@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, eah4@po.CWRU.Edu (Elizabeth A. Hlabse) writes:
> 
> 
> My vote's for #4, although I tend to wish #1.  When Don was asked
> about this at Leap Con, he said something along the lines of
> he liked having a married character, who didn't know he was
> married, so that he could have the lady of the week.  If only
> VP Quayle had heard that one.
> 
>       Beth Hlabse (eah4@po.CWRU.Edu)  Asst. Sysop  SciFi Sig (GO SCIFI)

I dunno, after setting up Sam for 3 years to be an absolute boy scout,
this lady of the week thing (which seems to have intensified SINCE we 
found Sam was married) is a disappointment. The Chinatown thing made
me especially wish Sam was single, since Tamlyn was close enough to his
time (and far enough from his age) to continue if/when he gets home. 

(I can see it now, this psychic 14 year old manages to entirely 
confound project security & break into the imaging chamber to meet his
/her dad ;-)
From: wixer!cactus.org!wixer!pro-smof.cts.com!rfletcher@cactus.org (Robert Fletcher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: STTNG Season SIX Broadcast Schedule
Date: 1 Sep 1992 11:19:46 -0500
Organization: The SMOF-BBS: Science Fiction Online Since 1985 [512-467-7317]
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

  Now that we have the titles how about a little meat. Hmmmm  :)
----
ProLine:  rfletcher@pro-smof
Internet: rfletcher@pro-smof.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher
ARPA:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher@nosc.mil

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: enc369l@monu1.cc.monash.edu.au (Mr BDJ. Johnson)
Subject: Blake's 7 again
Keywords: blake
Organization: Monash University, Australia.
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 11:54:13 GMT

Can someone tell me the number of episodes ? and maybe how many series etc.
Even a list of all episodes in order would be nice ! Would a blurb on each
one be asking too much now ?  :)

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: thomasp@paramount.nikhefk.nikhef.nl (Thomas Payerle)
Subject: Re: Yet Another Blake's 7 Question
Organization: NIKHEFK
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 19:33:38 GMT

In article <9g69PB4w164w@cybernet.cse.fau.edu> ekho.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu writes:
>oneill@cs.ulowell.edu (Brian 'Doc' O'Neill) writes:
>(stuff deleted)
>
>  One final thing:  Slave's voice was done by the same actor who did 
>Zen's voice, as well as Orac's!  I find it quite amusing when any of the 
>computers argue with eachother... I'm imagining poor Peter Tuddingham 
>(sp?) trying to coordinate with the voices and attempting to keep the 
>laughter from interferring with his lines! :)
Actually, I believe (someone with access to the programme guide can give
details) that Peter Tuddingham also was in a play in which he played the
voice of yet another computer.  Talk about type-casting.

				Tom Payerle
				Terran Sales Representative
				Big Sam's Anatomical Warehouse
				"Don't pay an arm and a leg
				 for an arm and a leg.
				 Go to Big Sam's!"



Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.startrek.current
From: dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman)
Subject: Re: Babylon 5: The Frequently Asked Questions List
Organization: The Admiral's Unix System & The Grid BBS
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 03:21:49 GMT

In article <1992Aug17.131406.11761@bnlux1.bnl.gov> schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:
>In article <1992Aug15.145041.20916@admiral.uucp> dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug14.125721.6846@bnlux1.bnl.gov> schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:
>>>In article <63946@cup.portal.com> Edward_Lee_Whiteside@cup.portal.com writes:
>>>
>>>>The BABYLON 5 Frequently Asked Questions List
>>>>
>>>>Updated 8/12/92
>>>>
>>>>1.  What is Babylon 5?
>>>>
>>>
>>>This is NOT rec.arts.babylon5!  If people want to know more about
>>>Babylon 5, they can read rec.arts.sf.tv!  This show has absolutely
>>>nothing to do with Star Trek.
>>
>>Conversely, you could put 'babylon 5' and 'B5' in your kill file.
>
>
>By this argument, extended conversations about Dr. Who could take place
>here with the caveat that if I don't care for such discussions, I could
>put "Dr. Who" in my kill file.  I don't follow your logic.

No, because Dr. Who has its own group. Babylon 5 does not (yet). I'm sure many
Star Trek fans (including myself) would like to hear about Babylon 5, especially
considering its apparent similarity to Deep Space Nine.

 
-- 
"Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Quick, man! Cling tenaciously to my buttocks!" -- Powdered Toast Man
From: jtisdel@digi.lonestar.org (J. Michael Tisdel)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: SF Channel anywhere?
Date: 2 Sep 92 17:53:06 GMT
Organization: DSC Communications Corp, Plano, TX

In article <20058@plains.NoDak.edu> person@plains.NoDak.edu (Brett G Person ) writes:
>So is the sf channel gonna show anywhere?  I don't have cable, so I don't know about my local cableCON ( not a typo) system.  From reading the net I hear alot of people saying that they are NOT going to get SFC.  Is there anyone who IS going to get it?
>
>-- 

I checked with our cable company here (TeleCable) is going to pick up
both the SF Channel and the Cartoon Network.  Yippee-skippee!


-- 
-----------------------------------\\\\\\\\\\\\\---------------------------
J. Michael Tisdel                   \\\\\\\\\\\\\ jtisdel@digi.lonestar.org
DSC Communications Corporation       \\\\\\\\\\\\\   ...!uunet!digi!jtisdel
1000 Coit Rd, MS 120, Plano Tx 75075  \\\\\\\\\\\\\        jmtisdel@aol.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: SF Channel anywhere?
From: rothe@teksun1.mdcbbs.com (Bill Rothe - Tekware sys mgr)
Date: 4 Sep 92 08:09:25 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: M&E (Division of EDS), Cypress CA


	Does anyone know if SFChannel is publishing a list of the Cable Co's
	that are carrying it???   That might be easier (and a BIG bragging
	point for them) than everybody asking "Is mine carrying it???"

-- 
*******************************************************************************
*        "Questions are a burden to others."                                  *
*	 "Answers are a prison unto themselves."                              *
*					- Number 2                            *
*									      *
*  rothe@mdcbbs.com       ** Opinions stated here are not those of EDS **     *
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: oneill@cs.ulowell.edu (Brian 'Doc' O'Neill)
Subject: Re: SF channel
Originator: oneill@bigmax.ulowell.edu
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Lowell Computer Science
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 13:50:22 GMT


In article <BtMxpB.JtG@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, flip@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Phillip Russell) writes:
|> Wow, we must be really deprived here in the Lafayette area. Dimension
|> Cable doesn't carry the Comedy Channel, Prime Ticket, and Playboy. I
|> guess that means we're the least likely to get the Sci-Fi channel.
|> 

Gee...now I _really_ hate my company...here in Lowell MA we don't get any of
the above, and also do not get VH-1, Headline News, E!, or TLC. We get a
local station piggybacked on TDC. We get WPIX which is blacked out most of
the day due to Syndex. We get a Canadian French station (which is fine, large
Canadian population here), Univision (Spanish, not sure why), two shopping
stations, and a religious channel. Since they have 2-tier service, most
things are scrambled, so all my expensive cable-ready stuff is useless
(they don't offer a solution).

Last I talked to them, they had "plans" to expand, and their channel selection
was based on "subscriber response". To what I don't know...I was never asked.

=======================================================================
Brian O'Neill - Systems Manager, Computer Science 	 (508) 934-3645
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
Internet: oneill@ulowell.edu		Moderator, comp.binaries.ibm.pc
From: grohol@novavax.UUCP (John Grohol)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re^2: Yet Another Blake's 7 Question
Date: 27 Aug 92 16:33:11 GMT
Organization: Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, FL

>slg7m@cc.usu.edu writes:

>> I watched Blake's 7 a few times about a year ago.  At that time, there was a
>> Blake and I believe there were even 7 crewmembers.  Since I've started watchi
>> it again, Blake is gone (presumably dead though Avor doesn't really believe
>> it), 2 more of the original crew members have died, their fabulous ship is
>> gone, which leaves them with 3 of the 7, ORAC and no Blake.
>> 
>> My question is this:  why did they call it Blake's 7 if (1) they got rid of
>> Blake (what would Dr. Who be without Dr. Who?) and (2) they were going to
>> decimate the number of the cast?  If anyone could give me a *short* synopsis 
>> what happened to Blake and the rest of the crew, I would appreciate it.
>> 
>> Tanya Olsen

My overall opinion and impression of why this is is simple:
It hasn't been done too often. Think about it. How often does
a show get away with basically "killing off" the main character,
lose a few other important characters, and start anew in its
3rd year on the air if it expects to last? Not only did "Blakes 7"
last this kind of overall, it went on for another 2 seasons (3&4)
rather sucessfully.

Granted, the 3rd season stinks as far as the writing goes. A search
for Blake is only somewhat organized and doesn't seem to lead very
far. Forget Genna. I guess she wasn't worth looking for... And
Avon doesn't really get his own status as their leader until halfway
through season3 and not really until season 4. Three of the original
crewmembers made it to the end, sorta. Orac wasn't quite original...

And then again, if you have any math skills, you would realize that
there were never 7 crewmembers except maybe for a brief moment in
season 2. Look:   Gant, Genna, Vila, Avon, Cally, Zen, and eventually
Orac. But Gant gets killed early on, leaving only 6. Blake is never
counted since it is "his" 7... And by season 3 we're down to 3 and 4
for a while..!

Enough ramblings... I'm outta here!

-- 
  John M. Grohol, M.S.    grohol@novavax.nova.edu     Nova University
--::--::--::--::--::--::--  the indigo girls:  --::--::--::--::--::--::--
   "Dark and dangerous like a secret that gets whispered in a hush,
    When I wake the things I dreamt about you last night make me blush."
From: ied1@kimbark.uchicago.edu (Ingrid de Beus)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: The Phoenix
Date: 2 Sep 92 18:55:48 GMT
Reply-To: ied1@midway.uchicago.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <1992Sep2.175308.1161@newshost.unh.edu> tcw@kepler.unh.edu (Timothy C Webb) writes:
>  Anybody remember this great show? It didn't last long, but I thought it was
>fantastic! The main character was Bennu, some guy from another world with this
>golden medallion that gave him his powers.
>  If you have any info on this program or (especially) know where I can find
>some episodes of it on VHS, please let me know. Thanks.
>
>-- 
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>|    Tim Webb             |     tcw@kepler.unh.edu                          |
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>|  "I wouldn't worry about it, Mrs. Brady. With the songs the way they are  |
>|   nowadays you can't hear the words well enough to understand that what   |
>|   you would have heard is something you wouldn't have understood anyway"  |
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh wow! I haven't thought about that show in years.. ack.  I really liked
it.  The main character was played by the same actor who was second 
banana to Khan in ST:TWOK, as I recall.  What was his name? <bang head
against wall> I would like to reiterate the plea shown above.. is this
on tape, anywhere?

-- 
Ingrid Elvire Maria de Beus			there is no god
ied1@midway.uchicago.edu			only greed,dung,and lies
oracle@usite-next.uchicago.edu			you've got no soul     
eyes of green smoke and hair of gold		only rips in your eyes
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Mann & Machine
From: jenkins@local.host
Date: 2 Sep 92 13:57:57 -0600
Reply-To: jenkins@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu
Organization: Organization, City, State, etc.

In article <8198@dirac.physics.purdue.edu>, millerbe@maxwell.physics.purdue.edu (Barry E. Miller) writes:
>
>	Does anyone have the first three Mann & Machine episodes on
>video?  I missed the first three shows, but caught the rest and was
>disappointed when it was canned. (They always can the good shows like
>Mann, or Probe!).

I am missing episode three, "No Pain, No Gain."  I now have all the rest on
tape, so if anyone wants to trade, please E-mail me at the *following*
address:


Lisa                         Jenkins@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu
1603 Thirteenth Street South
Moorhead, Minnesota 56560-3734

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
This has been a test of the emergency broadcast system.
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv