HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dave@eram.esi.COM.AU (Dave Horsfall)
Newsgroups: aus.radio
Subject: Daily IPS Report - 19 Nov 92
Date: 19 Nov 92 09:13:08 GMT
Distribution: aus
Organization: Pacific ESI, Sydney, AUSTRALIA

IPS RADIO AND SPACE SERVICES AUSTRALIA
Daily Solar And Geophysical Report
Issued at 2330 UT 18 November 1992
Summary for 18 November and Forecast up to 21 November
No IPS warning is current.
-----------------------------------------------------------

1A. SOLAR SUMMARY
Activity: moderate

Flares    Max     Fadeout    Begin   End    Freq.  Sectors
 M1/2B    1956UT    none

Observed 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 183/138

1B. SOLAR FORECAST
             19 November        20 November        21 November
Activity     Moderate           Moderate           Moderate
Fadeouts     Possible           Possible           Possible

Forecast 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 160/114

1C. SOLAR COMMENT
One solar region has the potential for further M-class flares.
-----------------------------------------------------------

2A. MAGNETIC SUMMARY
Geomagnetic field at Learmonth : quiet

Estimated Indices : A   K           Observed A Index 17 November
    Learmonth       03  1101 1121
    Fredericksburg  05                          06
    Planetary       08                          06


2B. MAGNETIC FORECAST
Geomagnetic field at Learmonth : quiet
Ap :  08

2C. MAGNETIC COMMENT
None.

3A. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION SUMMARY
Propagation conditions :         
Low Lats: Normal.
Mid Lats: Normal.
High Lats: Normal.
PCA Event : None.
3B. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION FORECAST
Propagation conditions are expected to be normal.
3C. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION COMMENT
None.

-----------------------------------------------------------

4A. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC SUMMARY
MUFs at Sydney were depressed 15% 00-04UT, then enhanced 15-20% until
21UT then near normal.

Observed Sydney Regional Ionospheric Index :  96

4B. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC FORECAST
          19 November        20 November        21 November
MUFs      enhanced about 10% enhanced about 10% enhanced about 10%
T index   100                100                100

Predicted Monthly Ionospheric Index for November is 70.

4C. AUSTRALIAN REGION COMMENT
None.

-- 
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU)         VK2KFU @ VK2RWI.NSW.AUS.OC
dave@esi.COM.AU                ...munnari!esi.COM.AU!dave
           Disclaimer: "Me, speak for us?"
From: dave@eram.esi.COM.AU (Dave Horsfall)
Newsgroups: aus.radio
Subject: Daily IPS Report - 16 Nov 92
Date: 16 Nov 92 10:36:13 GMT
Distribution: aus
Organization: Pacific ESI, Sydney, AUSTRALIA

IPS RADIO AND SPACE SERVICES AUSTRALIA
Daily Solar And Geophysical Report
Issued at 2330 UT 15 November 1992
Summary for 15 November and Forecast up to 18 November
No IPS warning is current.
-----------------------------------------------------------

1A. SOLAR SUMMARY
Activity: low

Flares: none.

Observed 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 127/079

1B. SOLAR FORECAST
             16 November        17 November        18 November
Activity     Low                Low to moderate    Low to moderate
Fadeouts     None expected      Possible           Possible

Forecast 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 130/082

1C. SOLAR COMMENT
A series of uncorrelated C class flares over the past 24 hours may
have been associated with the region expected to round the east limb
today.
-----------------------------------------------------------

2A. MAGNETIC SUMMARY
Geomagnetic field at Learmonth : mostly quiet, with active to minor
storm levels observed 12-18UT.

Estimated Indices : A   K           Observed A Index 14 November
    Learmonth       14  2112 4532
    Fredericksburg  10                          08
    Planetary       10                          08


2B. MAGNETIC FORECAST
Geomagnetic field at Learmonth : mostly quiet, with brief periods of
active levels possible during local night.
Ap :  10

2C. MAGNETIC COMMENT
None.

3A. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION SUMMARY
Propagation conditions :         
Low Lats: good.
Mid Lats: good.
High Lats: poor to fair.
PCA Event : None.
3B. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION FORECAST
Propagation conditions are expected to be good at low and mid lats,
and poor to fair at high lats.
3C. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION COMMENT
None.

-----------------------------------------------------------

4A. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC SUMMARY
MUFs at Sydney were near normal

Observed Sydney Regional Ionospheric Index :  61

4B. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC FORECAST
          16 November        17 November        18 November
MUFs      near normal        near normal        near normal
T index    70                 70                 70

Predicted Monthly Ionospheric Index for November is 70.

4C. AUSTRALIAN REGION COMMENT
Sporadic E layer was present for part of the local night, and may
have degraded local propagation conditions during that time.

-- 
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU)         VK2KFU @ VK2RWI.NSW.AUS.OC
dave@esi.COM.AU                ...munnari!esi.COM.AU!dave
           Disclaimer: "Me, speak for us?"
Newsgroups: aus.radio
From: steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche)
Subject: Re: antennae for scanning on 2m/70cm/23cm
Reply-To: steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche)
Organization: Tower Technology, Sydney
Distribution: aus
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 02:27:44 GMT

In article <1728@eram.esi.COM.AU> dave@eram.esi.COM.AU (Dave Horsfall) writes:
>In article <1992Nov10.020745.17973@fawlty.towers.oz.au>,
>    steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche) writes:
>
>| Yes, that's the Limited license, as it stands today,  but
>| get yourself a copy of Amateur Radio Action  next month, as it
>| will describe the proposed changes to the regulations, which includes
>| some new license classes. There will be a Novice-Limited which allows
>| 2m & 70cm from next year.
>
>Why wait that long?  Listen to the WIA broadcasts instead (or read it
>here :-).  And note that nothing is finalised - things may yet change.
>
 Yes, but ....
The broadcast wont tell you anything, until after A.R. & ARA are released
or depending on which one hits the street first, I would have preferred
to tell the person who asked the question, to join the WIA and then he
would be getting A.R. instead of having to buy ARA, but I doubt he could
do that in time.
As for changes, I doubt anything the senator mentioned would be changed
those poli's get enough egg on face, without looking for more.

steve


-- 
| Steven Blanche, Davidson, Sydney   | AARNet  steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au |
| vk2kfj%vk2kfj@vk2xsb.nsw.aus.oc    | wk phone :    +612-427-2999       |
| VK2KFJ [44.136.8.6] (4800@144.800) | wk fax   :    +612-427-7072       |
From: richardm@runx.oz.au (Richard Murnane)
Newsgroups: aus.radio
Subject: Re: antennae for scanning on 2m/70cm/23cm
Date: 20 Nov 92 21:56:58 GMT
Distribution: aus
Organization: RUNX Un*x Timeshare.  Sydney, Australia.

In article <1992Nov19.034149.10446@fawlty.towers.oz.au> steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche) writes:
> I hate it when people say they cant afford it, how much is it, its
>equivalent to a couple cases of beer and some people drink that in a
>single week, so give up beer for a week !  
>Same applies to just joining the WIA, its I think about $60 this year,
>bloody chicken feed, I know pensioners who throw twice as much into poker
>machines EACH WEEK !!
>Those old fossils have to come up with better excuses than that.
>
>de steve
Yes, I think the cost is a red herring, though $60 in one hit can be made to 
sound like a lot, especially to those who are waiting anxiously on their
next pay/pension cheque.
I've been working on an  introductory leaflet for the WIA, and I just
tried to express the cost in a different way, and i came up with "less than
20 cents a day" - less than renting a TV, which you wouldn't need anyway
if you were active...
Still $60 is too much for those who think nothing about spending thousands
on a rig. It's just a very weak attempt to justify a politically
motivated decision or simple apathy.

73 de Richard VK2SKY

-- 
Richard P. Murnane                     "Making it up? Making it up? Why should
Internet: richardm@runx.oz.au          I want to make anything up? Life's bad
UUCP:     uunet!runx.oz.au!richardm    enough without inventing more of it."
Packet:   VK2SKY @ VK2RWI.NSW.AUS.OC   - Marvin the Paranoid Android
Newsgroups: aus.radio
From: steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche)
Subject: WIA membership, was Re: antennae for scanning on 2m/70cm/23cm
Reply-To: steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche)
Organization: Tower Technology, Sydney
Distribution: aus
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 01:18:04 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.215658.10247@runx.oz.au> richardm@runx.oz.au (Richard Murnane) writes:
>In article <1992Nov19.034149.10446@fawlty.towers.oz.au> steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche) writes:
>> I hate it when people say they cant afford it, how much is it, its

>Still $60 is too much for those who think nothing about spending thousands
>on a rig. It's just a very weak attempt to justify a politically
>motivated decision or simple apathy.

I can agree to politically motivated and/or apathy !
but now the WIA needs to find why ? then act on it.

steve


-- 
| Steven Blanche, Davidson, Sydney   | AARNet  steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au |
| vk2kfj%vk2kfj@vk2xsb.nsw.aus.oc    | wk phone :    +612-427-2999       |
| VK2KFJ [44.136.8.6] (4800@144.800) | wk fax   :    +612-427-7072       |
From: makinc@hhcs.gov.au (Carl Makin)
Newsgroups: aus.radio.packet
Subject: Oh....  things..  It's a reply guys.
Date: 16 Nov 92 14:32:22 +1100
Organization: Aust. Dept. Health, Housing and Community Services

In article <1992Nov13.014709.28993@fawlty.towers.oz.au>, steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche) writes:

> Thats not unusual, if the network wasnt full of crap like that,
> then we wouldnt need a forum to improve the network.

Well, the BBS system isn't the "network".  It's actually an
application using network services.

> Also,  thanks for aircraft info, Carl !

No problems. :-)  I have a passing interest in Aircraft comms
too.  I've had a little play with hand-helds at 7000 feet and
it's wonderful to see how many repeaters you can key up with a
single transmission!

Carl.
-- 
Carl Makin, MVS/ESA Systems Programmer, VAX/VMS Dabbler. 
Dept. Health, Housing and Community Services, Canberra, Australia.
sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au!hhcs!makinc   -   UUCP
makinc@hhcs.gov.au		   -   Internet
vk1kcm@vk1kcm.act.aus.oc	   -   Packet Radio
"I'm from the Government and I'm here to help you."
Newsgroups: aus.radio.packet
From: cesnik@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (BRANKO CESNIK)
Subject: Help from anyone !
Keywords: packet Macintosh
Organization: Monash Univeristy
Distribution: aus.radio.packet
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 02:55:45 GMT

I am wanting to get set up with packet radio.  I have a 2 metre handheld
and a macintosh computer.  So what do I need?  Is there some kind of 
emulation software availiable for the mac for this purpose that is 
availiable?

This is being posted on behalf of a colleague visiting from New Zealand
Posted or Email replies would be appreciated

Email addresses are as follows

cesnik@medlan.med.monash.edu.au

OR

physmnixon@otago.ac.nz
 
Newsgroups: aus.radio.packet
From: wkt@csadfa.cs.adfa.oz.au (Warren Toomey)
Subject: NSW Packet Forum -- agenda/format?
Organization: Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, Australia
Distribution: aus
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 03:55:39 GMT

Ok, I'm coming up with Carl. I'd like to present say 6 OHP slides indicating
my ideas etc. to the forum. Is this possible? Who do I talk with etc???

Thanks!
	Warren vk1xwt
Newsgroups: aus.radio.packet
From: steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche)
Subject: Re: NSW Packet Forum -- agenda/format?
Reply-To: steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche)
Organization: Tower Technology, Sydney
Distribution: aus
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 03:49:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.035539.14981@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au> wkt@csadfa.cs.adfa.oz.au (Warren Toomey) writes:
>Ok, I'm coming up with Carl. I'd like to present say 6 OHP slides indicating
>my ideas etc. to the forum. Is this possible? Who do I talk with etc???
>
>Thanks!
>	Warren vk1xwt

I actually put the question about availability of overhead projector to
Richard VK2SKY, I think he said they dont have one, or doesnt know of
one on site. You might have to bring one with you, plus screen

de steve


-- 
| Steven Blanche, Davidson, Sydney   | AARNet  steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au |
| vk2kfj%vk2kfj@vk2xsb.nsw.aus.oc    | wk phone :    +612-427-2999       |
| VK2KFJ [44.136.8.6] (4800@144.800) | wk fax   :    +612-427-7072       |
From: makinc@hhcs.gov.au (Carl Makin)
Newsgroups: aus.radio.packet
Subject: Re: NSW Packet Forum. Your views please.SKIP/NEWSGROUP
Date: 16 Nov 92 14:48:22 +1100
Organization: Aust. Dept. Health, Housing and Community Services

In article <terryd.721697265@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU>, terryd@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Terry Dawson) writes:
> makinc@hhcs.gov.au (Carl Makin) writes:
 
>>Well I'll be there (Wearing my hats of BBS sysop, Wormhole
>>operator and CAPRG Chairman) so I'm interested in what people
>>using this newsgroup think. 
 
> I think I'm starting to agree with Brian Kantor.

That's being a trifle nasty! :-|
(and obscure for people that don't read certain mailing lists)

I suspect I'm already going to have to defend my right to have a
say at this "forum" as I'm not a member of the VK2 WIA division,
nor even a VK2 amateur, however *anything* the VK2s do regarding
networking is going to have an impact on us VK1s.  I, for one, am
not going to sit idly by and let the likes of Barry White and
AAPRA dictate how we're going to work.
 
>>Ok people.  Post here your views, ideas, comments and criticisms
>>of the current NSW network.  If anyone has a decent collection of
 
> There is no NSW network.

Crap.  There is more of a network floating around NSW than there
has been for MANY years.  The netrom and wormhole links are
working and data is being moved.  Sure it's not a wonderful
network and we're going to have to spend a lot of time and money
to make it halfway decent but it's a base we can build on.  At
least we haven't locked ourselves into a deadend like ROSE or
TEXNET.  BTW I do agree netrom is a deadend, however we can use
it as a stepping stone to TCP/IP.

>>the messages that floated around the packet network (like the
>>marathon effort by Rod, VK2DOT) it would be nice to have them
>>posted here as well.
 
> Which I replied to and receoved no reply to. Rod apparently isn't even
> turning up ..

Really?  John (VK2XY) seemed to think he was!  Bummer.

Carl.
-- 
Carl Makin, MVS/ESA Systems Programmer, VAX/VMS Dabbler. 
Dept. Health, Housing and Community Services, Canberra, Australia.
sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au!hhcs!makinc   -   UUCP
makinc@hhcs.gov.au		   -   Internet
vk1kcm@vk1kcm.act.aus.oc	   -   Packet Radio
"I'm from the Government and I'm here to help you."
Newsgroups: aus.radio.packet
From: terryd@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Terry Dawson)
Subject: Re: NSW Packet Forum. Your views please.SKIP/NEWSGROUP
Organization: Sydney University Computing Service, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 22:24:11 GMT

terryd@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Terry Dawson) writes:

>>Really?  John (VK2XY) seemed to think he was!  Bummer.

>yes, so John has also told me, but I have been assurred by a person that I
>trust that Rod told him he wasn't coming ... he might change his mind
>I suppose.

I've just re-read that ... and I'd like to say that it is _not_ intended to
imply that I do not trust John vk2xy. I thought I'd better make that clear
before any overactive imaginations got to work on it :-)

Terry


-- 
Terry Dawson, terryd@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU, vk2ktj@gw.vk2ktj.ampr.org
+61 2 925 1556 (voice), +61 2 922 5973 (fax).   __\*/__  0^Ooooo _
From: dave@eram.esi.COM.AU (Dave Horsfall)
Newsgroups: aus.radio.packet
Subject: Re: NSW Packet Forum -- agenda/format?
Date: 19 Nov 92 05:28:43 GMT
Distribution: aus
Organization: Pacific ESI, Sydney, AUSTRALIA

In article <1992Nov19.034933.10710@fawlty.towers.oz.au>,
    steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche) writes:

| I actually put the question about availability of overhead projector to
| Richard VK2SKY, I think he said they dont have one, or doesnt know of
| one on site. You might have to bring one with you, plus screen

There is indeed one - it's used every week for the Novice classes, and
is in plain sight (sorry Richard).  And yes, there is a screen as well.

-- 
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU)         VK2KFU @ VK2RWI.NSW.AUS.OC
dave@esi.COM.AU                ...munnari!esi.COM.AU!dave
           Disclaimer: "Me, speak for us?"
Newsgroups: aus.radio.packet
From: steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche)
Subject: Re: NSW Packet Forum. Your views please.SKIP/NEWSGROUP
Reply-To: steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au (Steve Blanche)
Organization: Tower Technology, Sydney
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 01:37:21 GMT

In article <terryd.722211851@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU> terryd@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Terry Dawson) writes:
>terryd@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Terry Dawson) writes:
>
>>>Really?  John (VK2XY) seemed to think he was!  Bummer.
>
>>yes, so John has also told me, but I have been assurred by a person that I
>>trust that Rod told him he wasn't coming ... he might change his mind
>>I suppose.
>
>I've just re-read that ... and I'd like to say that it is _not_ intended to
>imply that I do not trust John vk2xy. I thought I'd better make that clear
>before any overactive imaginations got to work on it :-)
>
I can assure you, he WASN'T there

steve


-- 
| Steven Blanche, Davidson, Sydney   | AARNet  steve@fawlty.towers.oz.au |
| vk2kfj%vk2kfj@vk2xsb.nsw.aus.oc    | wk phone :    +612-427-2999       |
| VK2KFJ [44.136.8.6] (4800@144.800) | wk fax   :    +612-427-7072       |
Newsgroups: aus.radio.packet
From: terryd@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Terry Dawson)
Subject: Re: NSW Packet Forum. Your views please.SKIP/NEWSGROUP
Organization: Sydney University Computing Service, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 05:29:36 GMT

makinc@hhcs.gov.au (Carl Makin) writes:

>> I think I'm starting to agree with Brian Kantor.

>That's being a trifle nasty! :-|
>(and obscure for people that don't read certain mailing lists)

Nasty ? Ok its obscure .. but not nasty. I was referring to his
"Is there any hope at all?" comment .. not necessarily anything else ..
although I fully support IP advocacy in principle.

>> There is no NSW network.

>Crap.  There is more of a network floating around NSW than there
>has been for MANY years.  The netrom and wormhole links are

Yes, but there is no NSW network. There is a Rose network which covers mostly
northern nsw. There is the netrom network which covers the Newcastle to Canberrastrip and a little west. There is the IP network which is damn near totally
dependent on the gateways. There is no NSW network ..  we have the beginnings
of an internet in its truest sense .. the various networks could be linked
formally, then there would be a NSW network.

>> Which I replied to and receoved no reply to. Rod apparently isn't even
>> turning up ..

>Really?  John (VK2XY) seemed to think he was!  Bummer.

yes, so John has also told me, but I have been assurred by a person that I
trust that Rod told him he wasn't coming ... he might change his mind
I suppose.

Terry

-- 
Terry Dawson, terryd@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU, vk2ktj@gw.vk2ktj.ampr.org
+61 2 925 1556 (voice), +61 2 922 5973 (fax).   __\*/__  0^Ooooo _
Newsgroups: aus.radio
From: dave@eram.esi.COM.AU (Dave Horsfall)
Newsgroups: aus.radio
Subject: Fees (was Re: antennae for scanning on 2m/70cm/23cm)
Date: 21 Nov 92 06:28:37 GMT
Distribution: aus
Organization: Pacific ESI, Sydney, AUSTRALIA

In article <1992Nov20.215658.10247@runx.oz.au>,
    richardm@runx.oz.au (Richard Murnane) writes:

| Yes, I think the cost is a red herring, though $60 in one hit can be made to 
| sound like a lot, especially to those who are waiting anxiously on their
| next pay/pension cheque.

It is not widely known, but it is possible to pay in instalments.  There
are also cheaper grades, such as Student (full time only), financially-
challenged (used to be called Pensioner), and of course AR-free.

| I've been working on an  introductory leaflet for the WIA, and I just
| tried to express the cost in a different way, and i came up with "less than
| 20 cents a day" - less than renting a TV, which you wouldn't need anyway
| if you were active...

I would gladly spend 20 cents/day, if I knew someone was making sure that
I was able to continue using my favourite bands/modes every day.  Of course
you would want an assurance that the money is wisely spent, as Terry has
already pointed out.

| Still $60 is too much for those who think nothing about spending thousands
| on a rig. It's just a very weak attempt to justify a politically
| motivated decision or simple apathy.

You got it.  It's easier to say "I can't afford it!" rather than say "I'm
not going to renew my membership because I think the WIA stinks, but I am
incapable of forming a coherent argument, because Mr Ed has done it for me,
so instead I'll say I can't afford it."  Boy, you should see some of the
remarks on the rejected renewals that crossed our desk...

-- 
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU)         VK2KFU @ VK2RWI.NSW.AUS.OC
dave@esi.COM.AU                ...munnari!esi.COM.AU!dave
           Disclaimer: "Me, speak for us?"
From: dave@eram.esi.COM.AU (Dave Horsfall)
Newsgroups: aus.radio.amsat
Subject: Orbital Elements  319.OSCAR
Date: 17 Nov 92 02:32:59 GMT
Distribution: aus
Organization: Pacific ESI, Sydney, AUSTRALIA

HR AMSAT ORBITAL ELEMENTS FOR OSCAR SATELLITES
FROM N3FKV  HEWITT, TX   November 14, 1992  BID:$ORBS-319.O
TO ALL RADIO AMATEURS BT

Satellite: AO-10
Catalog number: 14129
Epoch time:      92317.04260000
Element set:     939
Inclination:       26.9656 deg
RA of node:        54.7415 deg
Eccentricity:    0.6020465
Arg of perigee:    32.4394 deg
Mean anomaly:     353.1450 deg
Mean motion:    2.05879299 rev/day
Decay rate:       -6.2e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev:            7079
Checksum:              296

Satellite: UO-11
Catalog number: 14781
Epoch time:      92315.08755945
Element set:     382
Inclination:       97.8345 deg
RA of node:       344.9530 deg
Eccentricity:    0.0012176
Arg of perigee:   343.3821 deg
Mean anomaly:      16.6983 deg
Mean motion:   14.68726556 rev/day
Decay rate:       7.99e-06 rev/day^2
Epoch rev:           46455
Checksum:              346

Satellite: RS-10/11
Catalog number: 18129
Epoch time:      92318.04844784
Element set:     465
Inclination:       82.9296 deg
RA of node:        38.3681 deg
Eccentricity:    0.0011099
Arg of perigee:   191.6823 deg
Mean anomaly:     168.4064 deg
Mean motion:   13.72298951 rev/day
Decay rate:        9.7e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev:           27020
Checksum:              330

Satellite: AO-13
Catalog number: 19216
Epoch time:      92317.05336400
Element set:     536
Inclination:       57.3817 deg
RA of node:       350.4932 deg
Eccentricity:    0.7280791
Arg of perigee:   301.0222 deg
Mean anomaly:       7.4214 deg
Mean motion:    2.09724202 rev/day
Decay rate:       -5.1e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev:            3380
Checksum:              259

Satellite: FO-20
Catalog number: 20480
Epoch time:      92313.67971649
Element set:     430
Inclination:       99.0611 deg
RA of node:       205.2944 deg
Eccentricity:    0.0539771
Arg of perigee:   225.9231 deg
Mean anomaly:     129.6204 deg
Mean motion:   12.83214360 rev/day
Decay rate:       -2.0e-08 rev/day^2
Epoch rev:           12903
Checksum:              282

Satellite: AO-21
Catalog number: 21087
Epoch time:      92318.14081727
Element set:     616
Inclination:       82.9465 deg
RA of node:       212.6900 deg
Eccentricity:    0.0034101
Arg of perigee:   264.4612 deg
Mean anomaly:      95.2659 deg
Mean motion:   13.74499313 rev/day
Decay rate:       1.01e-06 rev/day^2
Epoch rev:            8976
Checksum:              297

Satellite: RS-12/13
Catalog number: 21089
Epoch time:      92313.40227252
Element set:     382
Inclination:       82.9233 deg
RA of node:        85.8517 deg
Eccentricity:    0.0029882
Arg of perigee:   300.9774 deg
Mean anomaly:      58.8447 deg
Mean motion:   13.74004841 rev/day
Decay rate:        5.5e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev:            8820
Checksum:              309

-- 
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU)         VK2KFU @ VK2RWI.NSW.AUS.OC
dave@esi.COM.AU                ...munnari!esi.COM.AU!dave
           Disclaimer: "Me, speak for us?"