HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dks@athena.mit.edu (dks)
Subject: Re: Targetting a relevant isue?
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 17:57:41 GMT

d89-jsp@nada.kth.se (Jan Sparrendahl) writes:
>From "In These Times," Feb 25-March 10, 1987:
>About Pat Robertson, televangelist running for President:
>
>Some things Pat doesn't write about are in Gerard Straub's eye-opening book
>"Salvation for Sale". Straub was producer of the 700 Club until he became
>disenchanted and was fired over his affair with an employee.  His wildest
>revelation concerns a 1979 CBN plan known as GSP (God's Secret Project).  It
>was nothing less than to televise the Second Coming.  Pat is convinced that
>recent events involving Israel prove that Jesus is about to return. [later
>in the article, quoting Straub]:
>
>	The greatest show on earth was in our hands.  I wondered where we would
>	put the cameras.  Jerusalem was the obvious place.  We even discussed
>	how Jesus' radiance might be too bright for the cameras and how we
>	would have to make adjustments for that problem.  Can you imagine
>	telling Jesus, "Hey, Lord, please tone down your luminosity; we having
>	a problem with contrast.  You're causing the picture to flare".


Anyone interested in this sort of thing should
read "Live from Golgotha," Gore Vidal's latest little heresy.
The gist: NBC obtains exclusive rights to the original crucifixion.


Dhanesh

  Maybe Dave is wrong about GE after all.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson)
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Indiscretions (and Teddy's comment)
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 11:49:51 GMT

In <1992Oct1.220113.6649@adobe.com> chesnutt@adobe.com (Stan Chesnutt) writes:

>I also remember, though, sitting in a New York restaurant several years ago
>and hearing Dan Rather in the next booth saying "But he is really, I mean
>REALLY dumb!" to his lunch companions...

No, no...that was Tom Brokaw they were talking about!

Michael
From: esp51@cas.org ()
Subject: Re: What's the deal?
Organization: Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 18:13:42 GMT

In article <1992Oct4.222251.3951@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>Gee, the name of this group is alt.fan.dan-quayle, but all I see are Quayle
>bashes here.  Could somebody direct me to a group where Republican policies
>and characters are discussed in a more friendly manner?
>--
>
>Brian E. Saunders                      saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu


That's about as perfect a flamebait message as I've ever read on the net.
It also displays a characteristic Republican conservative attitude towards
criticism, namely they can't put up with it.  Here in Ohio this was
demonstrated at a Republican "rally" featuring Danorama and K. George.
They sold tickets to the event, you couldn't get in without a ticket,
the the tickets were conviently distributed to nothing but republiclones,
assuring nothing but friendly soundbites.

Scott Park    Opinions are mine, I do not speak for my company.

Trickle down economics demonstrated:  Danster and George up on a platform
simultaneously urinating down on the face of a recently unemployed GM
worker who voted for them.  The crowd of corporate lawyers goes wild.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The Last Word on "Potatoe".
From: hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Anthony 'SCHWAibo' Hobbs)
Date: 6 Oct 92 23:28:17 NZST
Organization: Chief Lord High Priest, ACCGEK
NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

In article <1992Oct6.084120.11765@mv.mv.com>, mem@mv.mv.com (Mark E. Mallett) writes:

> Yes, there is a big difference.  In the one case, there was a man who
> had been given the incorrect spelling on a card; in the other case, there
> was a published report, presumably with spelling checks and proofreaders.
> 
> Which one is more excusable?

Being given the wrong spelling doesn't excuse the man. If he was firing on all
cylinders, he would have noticed that the spelling was *wrong*. WHY DIDN'T HE?

Answer: he is DIM. Seriously DIM.

Clinton '92 - we need a US president who can play the saxophone!
-- 
"Look over there! See that man on the bus! Is he looking at you... PARANOIA!"

Anthony Hobbs		SCHWAibo		    hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Chief Lord High Priest, ACCGEK - Hail Frozen Yoghurt - Snuggles Loves You
DISCLAIMER: I am not Romanian and was not head of the Securitate for 15 years.
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:4815 alt.politics.clinton:8065 alt.politics.bush:7405
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush
From: liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Subject: Re: Quayle is more charitable than Gore
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Date: 1 Oct 92 21:51:36 GMT

In article <1992Sep29.223717.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> cdpert01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>     Here's an interesting little piece I found in the October 5
>National Review (pg. 12, col. 2):
>
>     In this corner, Al Gore, apostle of charity, compassion, and
>     saving the earth.  His opponent, Dan Quayle -- avatar of
>     Republican greed and selfishness.  Tax returns show that the 
>     two had similar incomes last year.  Guess which one gave more
>     to charity?  Of course.  The Quayles gave $5,670, or 3 per cent
>     of their income, while the Gores gave $1,727 -- less than 
>     1 per cent.  Maybe Mr. Gore was trying to strengthen the case
>     for federal poverty programs.
>
>It looks like Gore, the media-proclaimed moderate, is really just
>another hypocritical bleeding heart -- since his public rhetoric
>dwarfs his private generosity.
>
>     C. Perttunen

yes, but I thought Gore had more children to support and he
doesn't have a family that have $1 billion in net worth.
now how about the donation/net worth percentage?
From: jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. 'TGaPC' Schechner)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Indiscretions (and Teddy's comment)
Date: 4 Oct 92 00:43:22 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1992Oct1.220113.6649@adobe.com> chesnutt@adobe.com (Stan Chesnutt) writes:
>In article <1992Oct1.135615.1731@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu> afc@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu writes:
>
>Malcolm Jr was generally ridiculed for making that statement, but I have
>a nagging suspicion that DQ did not get to where he is now by a combination
>of accident and his good looks ...

	No, his family had a hell of a lot to do with it too.  And his
money didn't hurt either.
				

> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Stan Chesnutt,  Adobe Systems			      chesnutt@mv.us.adobe.com

-Jason

-- 
"Down here on the planet Earth 
They steal your back and leave the shirt.
Pay you a penny and call it a dime and then   -Jason and
Give you a watch when you run out of time."   -the Scorchers 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cortez@milton.u.washington.edu (Tom Warner)
Subject: Re: Don't cry for me, Argentina
Organization: University of Washington
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 11:44:55 GMT

pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh) writes:

>Earlier this week, somebody posted the following Quayle Quote:

>  We are leaders of the world of the space program.
>  We have been the leaders of the world of our... of the space program
>  and we're not going to continue where we're going to go, not withstanding 
>  the Soviet Union's demise and collapse - the former Soviet Union - we now
>  have independent republics which used to be called the Soviet Union.
>  Space is the next frontier to be explored. And we're going to explore.
>  Think of all the things we rely upon in space today: communications 
>  from... Japan, detection of potential ballistic missile attacks. Ballistic 
>  missiles are still here. Other nations do have ballistic missiles. How do
>  you think we were able to detect some of the Scud missiles and things like 
>  that?  Space, reconnaissance, weather, communications - you name it. We
>  use space a lot today.
>		-- Vice President Dan Quayle

>Something peculiar about this quote has been nagging at me ever since.  I
>usually expect Dan to simply say inane things.  But this quote is different
>because I'm still trying to figure out just WHAT it is that he's said here!
>The rambling, incoherent sentences make this difficult.  This morning I
>think I finally figured out what's strange about this quote:  this isn't
>Quayle speaking Quaylespeak, this is Quayle speaking Bushspeak!

I was in a pizza place today where they hang the day's papers on the walls
in front of where you sit to eat, reading the latest NYT story on Bush's
denial of knowing what was going on with Iran-Contra. The article had a sidebar
with a whole bunch of Bush quotes, listed chronologically, about what he knew.
And what struck me was how hard it was to decipher just what the hell he was
saying. At first I thought the NYT might have flubbed its copy-editing. But
the garbled english was in almost every quote. Then the guy sitting next to
me pointed out what should have been obvious to me -- he said, "I think
he does that on purpose, so that no matter what you interpret him as saying,
he can say he didn't say that, and you took him out of context."

So was it purely by chance that Quayle fumbled out a Bushism,
or is Quayle finally learning a job skill?

>- Patrick Walsh
>  University of Virginia Department of Physics
>  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jwk@sequent.com (John "Just Say Noe" Kramer)
Subject: Brett Kimberlin...
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 18:55:08 GMT

Any know about this guy, and why he is in an Oklahoma jail? Press I've
seen indicate he has news on Dan-o "rolling his own for health reasons"
in contradiction of American family values. His parole was due in 1989
but it seems that when he tries to speak to outsiders, they withdraw
parole...next stop 1994.

Any ideas?
Organization: City University of New York/ University Computer Center
Date: Tuesday, 29 Sep 1992 14:44:39 EDT
From: Brian Taylor <MSIMS@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Hill of Beans
 <92Sep29.134811edt.47983@neat.cs.toronto.edu>

In article <92Sep29.134811edt.47983@neat.cs.toronto.edu>, liuyh@cs.toronto.edu
(Yuanhui Liu) says:
>
>In article <9209271722.AA13251@MIT.EDU> dks@MIT.EDU (dks) writes:
>>
>>liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu) writes:
>>> tertium@milton.u.washington.edu (l boyd) writes:
>>> > You spose that face on mars is a monument to JDQ?
>>> > After all, there is no sign of *intelligent* life on Mars...
>>>
>>> I got an idea, maybe after JDQ died, we can name some dead voclano
>>> on Mars "Mount of Quayle" or something.  ;->  that is, the astronomers
>>> of tommorrow (I assume they are the spelling bee champions of today)
>>> still chuckling about the JDQ quotes.
>>
>>Mount of Quayle?  The fool doesn't amount to a Hill of Beans.
>
>in order to get a hill of beans:  we need water, oxygen, canal irrigation,
>soil, CO2, sunshine....
>
>Gosh, JDQ must think we can get a hill of beans on Mars.
>
>>
>>
>>Dhanesh


if dan quayle ate a hill of beans on mars, wouldn't he have
enough gas to make his own martian atmosphere?
course, i wouldn't want to breath that air but then again,
the quayle commission on the environment isn't doing
such a great job on this planet either.......

brian...
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann)
Subject: Re: The debate is on?????
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Distribution: Society for Putting Things on Top of Other Things
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 02:28:35 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.194839.27913@sbctri.sbc.com> asper@time.sbc.com (Alan E. Asper) writes:
>In article <1992Oct2.185155.21571@netcom.com> madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann) writes:
>>9.  The swimsuit competition counts for at least 50% of the debate
>>
>>-- 
>>Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
>Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer, Plagiarist.  Take your pick.
>
>The swimsuit joke was on one of Letterman's Top Ten lists.
>Better luck next time.

I tried to email you, but it bounced.  Anyway, since I don't rot my
brain with TV, I didn't see Letterman's list, so you can hardly call
me a plagiarist.

Now I know Joe Biden, and let me tell you...


-- 
Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer.  Take your pick.

Centigram Communications Corp, San Jose California  408/428-3553
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dannos education
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 92 14:07:39 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


dbsgrm@Arco.COM (Gary R Meyers(214)754-4191) writes:

> I was just home at lunch, and while watching CNN, the newsreader (Lynn Vaughan (sp)) spake 
> the following _paraphrasing here_
> 
> "Vice President Dan Quayle said that he will be at a disadvantage 
> during his debates with contender Al Gore. Mr. Quayle  said that
> he didn't have advantage of the private school education
> the Mr. Gore had ,but that he felt that he could overcome
> the disadvantage of his public school background."
> 
> Anybody hear the exact quote?

According to the San Jose Mercury News, it went like this:

"It's going to be a very interesting contest because he went to the
most expensive schools, and I went to public schools. He'll have a big
advantage".

Since Quayle's three children have attended private schools since he
became VP, I suggest he send *them* out to debate Gore.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: eck@panix.com (Mark Eckenwiler)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle is more charitable than Gore
Date: 5 Oct 92 16:03:37 GMT
Organization: Superseding Information, Inc.

In <1992Sep30.150828.8468@netcom.com>, jrs@netcom.com sez:
>In article <1992Sep30.085836@IASTATE.EDU> danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock) writes:
>>   Do you detect a gentle undercurrent of panic in some of the conservative
>>postings lately?  The one that started this thread was a doozy.

>Man, if there is an "undercurrent of panic" among conservatives, then there is
>stark raving lunacy occurring among liberals. 
>-- 
>John Switzer               | 50 years from now, nobody will
>                           | remember Candice Bergen or Murphy
>74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | Brown, but every school kid will
>jrs@netcom.com             | be taught about President Quayle.

(Is Switzer's panic becoming more shrill?)

With a .sig like that, JohnChip, you've got the stark raving lunacy
territory pretty well staked out.  Now run along to your radio and
alt.fatboy.limbaugh, and post another slavish _adoratio_.  Wouldn't
want to miss another pathetic phone call from Rain Man inviting Rush
to be the moderator for the VP debate, now would you?

-- 
		The sleep of reason begets Limbaughs.

	Mark Eckenwiler    eck@panix.com    ...!cmcl2!panix!eck
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: zrepachol@cc.curtin.edu.au (Paul Repacholi)
Subject: Re: Neil "Welfare Queen" Bush
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 19:01:57 GMT

In article <1992Sep16.231320.7815@news.columbia.edu>, egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:
> In article <1992Sep16.201624.7773@sequent.com> dinneen@sequent.com (Jay Dinneen) writes:
>>
>>Bush is not a conservative.  Neither was his
>>cheap-car-salesman-predecessor Ronald Reagan
> 
> Well, Reagan was (and is) adored as the avatar of the New Right...
> 
Te correct political label for Bush and Reagan is, I believe, State-Facist.

~Paul

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Re: Quayle is more charitable than Gore
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 15:08:28 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.085836@IASTATE.EDU> danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock) writes:
>   Do you detect a gentle undercurrent of panic in some of the conservative
>postings lately?  The one that started this thread was a doozy.

<<missing about Quayle/Gore charitable contributions>>

>to the need.  Other objections to the conservative smear campaign:
>
>   (I) Does Danee Quayle have more access to Government resources than Gore or
>       less?  Gore might be buying his _own_ airplane tickets some of the time,
>       unlike Dannoe.
>
>   (II) How much support do Gore and Dannye get from their famillies in terms
>        of vacation trips, logistical serveces etc?
>
>   (III) How much spare time for Quaylee and Gore have?  A busy man will donate
>         less to charity simply because he fails to read his junk mail.
>
>   (IV) How much time to Mrs. Dannyeoe and Ms. Clinton have to work for (and 
>        hence get involved in) charitable causes?

What do these have to do with anything? I really doubt, by the way, that Gore, 
a member of the Senate is pulling down less perks than the VP, except perhaps
in Secret Service protection. And what does "family support" have to do with
charitable contributions? And to see that "busy men" don't have time to 
make charitable deductions is absurd - some of the busiest people I know 
are the most generous, and not all of them are rich. Ditto for your sexist 
comment about Marilyn Quayle and Ms. Clinton [sic] and their involvement 
in charities.

Man, if there is an "undercurrent of panic" among conservatives, then there is
stark raving lunacy occurring among liberals. 
-- 
John Switzer               | 50 years from now, nobody will
                           | remember Candice Bergen or Murphy
74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | Brown, but every school kid will
jrs@netcom.com             | be taught about President Quayle.
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The Last Word on "Potatoe".
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 92 09:17:40 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


mem@mv.mv.com (Mark E. Mallett) writes:

> jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. 'TGaPC' Schechner) writes:

> >	Sorry to burst your bubble here, but there is a BIG difference
> >between a typo an 'correcting' an elementary school child who had the
> >spelling right the first time!!!

> Yes, there is a big difference.  In the one case, there was a man who
> had been given the incorrect spelling on a card; in the other case, there
> was a published report, presumably with spelling checks and proofreaders.
> 
> Which one is more excusable?

Yeah, Danny's been reading his own life from scripts for so long now,
we certainly wouldn't expect him to question anything that was placed
in front of him. "Here Dan, just smile and say this ..."

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Date: Friday, 2 Oct 1992 22:27:09 PST
From: <RAJA@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: James Bond V.P.!

Our Man Perot (what a jerk!) has chosen a running mate    retired admiral James
 Bond etc.(Stockdale). Is this aportent of things to come. It will be a change
from a V.P. named after a hunted bird ( and looks like it many times) or one wh
o reminds you of B-movies (Gore if you don't get it) to someone who can genuine
ly introduce himself if he chose to as" The name is Bond, James Bond!"

Yowsah!....rajagopalan
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: day_kevran@tandem.com (Kevran Day )
Subject: Re: It's just a TV SHOW!
Followup-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Organization: Tandem Computers, Inc.
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1992 20:44:29 GMT

In article <1992Sep22.163548.2451@u.washington.edu>,
sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) wrote:
> 
> On the 11:00 news last night there was some coverage of the
> Murphy Brown event.  First, there were some clips from 
> the show.  Then, to preserve the illusion of fairness,
> the view from the Dan Quayle camp.  But what a view!
> There was Our Boy watching MB, surrounded by
> a roomful of single mothers!
> 

Not to nitpick but, it was a room full of single, black,
mother AND fathers.   That should pull in a few votes,
eh?

> Style: 1     Substance: 0

Definitely!

> -- 
> | Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
> | U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |

Kevran 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sandy@fc.hp.com (Sandy Arvidson)
Subject: Re: debates
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 15:46:03 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Fort Collins Site
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.3 PL6]


>That's already been decided.  I'll be interested to see if Our Boy actually
>breaks from his well-rehearsed, scripted lines and comes up with an original
>thought.

Let's hope so...Dannikins is so entertaining when he speaks off the cuff.
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 12:38:24 EDT
From: <JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Indiscretions

In article <1992Sep30.140453.9141@gvl.unisys.com>, train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com
(Herbert Rutledge) says:
>
> I put it to you, a.f.d-q'ers everywhere.  Wuddya think?  Is Marilyn getting
> some action on the side?  And, if so, with whom?
>

BLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEECH!  Excuse me while I drop by ALT.BLOW.LUNCH.

Jeff Luck                *My Opinions are Mine but Facts are Facts*
CES Systems Office
Penn State University            "Whatever you guys want, I'm for."
JFL4@PSUVM.PSU.EDU                  -Dan Quayle to Ohio Farmers, 1988
From: popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Getting a job
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 01:06:49 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy

dks@MIT.EDU (dks) writes:

> 
> In article <1992Sep22.182847.7119@galileo.physics.arizona.edu>,
> Ted Krueger writes against the Family and Medical Leave Act:
> >
> >      [Quayl-free content deleted]
> >
> > "Vote Democrat.  It's easier than getting a job."
> 
> 
> Right.  Getting a job is pretty difficult these days.
> 
> 
> 
> Dhanesh
> 
>   Newcomers to the group will not realize it, but September 22
>   marked an historic occasion: the long-awaited return of the
>   original Krueger Kid to a.f.d.-q. after a very long absence.
> 


Hey dood!  Everyone a Maserati!  That one's at least worth
13 ** 8 Bart Simpson HooHaw points!

--
popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, (713) 943-2728 in Houston, Texas
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
From: jviv@usmi01.midland.chevron.com (John Viveiros)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Believing six impossible things before breakfast
Date: 28 Sep 92 18:22:16 GMT
Organization: Chevron

In article <9209272332.AA15305@MIT.EDU> dks@MIT.EDU (dks) writes:
>
>In a long article that had almost nothing to do with Dannikins,
>mykes@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG (Mike Schwartz) explains (among other things):
>
>  1. I hear Bush talk about the issues everytime he speaks.
>
>  2. Bush clearly believes in the "kinder, gentler" nation principles
>     he ran on in 1988, it seems.
>
>  3. Actually, in many ways, things are indeed better, economically,
>     than any time in the last 50 years
>
>  4. Reagan surrounded himself with extremely sharp and able people at
>     the key cabinet and executive staff positions ...
>
>  5. ... Bush has not done a good job at that.  But that looks like
>     it will change in 1992, when he gets reelected.
>
>  6. So WHO would I like to be voting for for president? Believe it or
>     not, I'd rather vote for Quayle as president than Bush or Clinton.
>
>Since I believe that Mike is expressing his opinions sincerely, I am led
>to the inescapable conclusion that he and I live in different universes.
>
>Dhanesh

Mike Schwartz -- do you (or anyone else out there) actually believe this?
I don't want to waste my time arguing against a fictional character.
I don't seem to recall a post that was that stupid, did you make this
up Dhanesh?
-- 
John Viveiros     (jviv@chevron.com)
Chevron USA        Standard disclaimer applies
Midland TX 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle