HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: scholvin@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (John Scholvin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Brent Sutter:  How Long ??
Keywords: blackhawks Brent Sutter
Date: 10 Nov 92 14:37:23 GMT
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.

In article <1252@fozzy.UUCP> twollnik@fozzy.UUCP (Ted Wollnik) writes:
>So I have heard that Brent Sutter is supposed to be
>back in action after that broken foot accident.  Has
>anybody else heard this.

Brent is back.  He played in both games this past weekend (Quebec and
Pittsburgh), and collected 1 goal and 3 assists. 

>Also, has anybody heard when Keith Brown might be
>back in action.  The Hawks Penalty killing could sure
>use his help.

Keith is supposed to back around the first of the year.  The Hawks could use
him at even strength as much as their penalty killing.  Brownie is the
steadiest defenseman they have.

>===============================================================================
>| Ted Wollnik Jr                         | Go Black Hawks !!!                 | 
>| twollnik@rdxsun11.aud.alcatel.com      | Waite for Vezina..Roenick for Hart | 
>===============================================================================
>| god damn the people who left you in pain                                    |
>| god damn the father without face, without name                              |
>| and god damn the lovers who never showed up                                 |
>| and god damn the wounds that show how dee a word can cut                    | 
>|               - Toad the Wet Sprocket                                       |
>===============================================================================
>| OFFICIAL:  Net contact for the Dallas Freeze (and the rest of the CHL ??)   | 
>===============================================================================
>
>yeah I know!! but at least it HOCKEY !!!!


-- 
John Scholvin                           |  "Sometimes I wish I was Catholic
scholvin@casbah.acns.nwu.edu            |   I don't know why"
echo Y | del c:\windows\*.*             |       -Cracker
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: yvon@ramsey.cs.laurentian.ca (Yvon Lavoie)
Subject: Pelle Eklund injury?
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 18:28:52 GMT


I was just wondering if anyone knows anything about Pelle Eklund. I know
he broke his ankle in training camp but I was wondering when he will start
playing again?  If anyone knows the scoop on Pelle, let me know.


Yvon Lavoie
From: cooper@seismo.CSS.GOV (Dale Cooper)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: * for a beer: trades by Washington..
Date: 13 Nov 92 16:36:07 GMT
Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA

In article <1695@niktow.canisius.edu> bittle@niktow.canisius.edu (Jason Bittle) writes:
>who did Washington trade.. Kelly Miller, or Kevin Miller?
>
>I have a friend saying Kelly, and another saying Kevin!
>
>A beer rides in the outcome!

And the beer goes to the friend who says....

	Kevin Miller!

He was traded due to his lack-o-production in his first ten games.  Zero goals
and two (me thinks) assists.  The Caps organization decided that he just wasn't
working out as expected.  Rumor has it that the trade for Cavallini (sp) would
help bolster a "post-Langway" defense.  So far so good, the Caps are unbeaten
in their last six games (4-1-1).

The Capitals casualty list as of today (11-13):

Randy Burridge	- knee surgery
Dmitri Kristich - broken foot
Jason Woolley	- broken wrist
Michal Pivonka	- groin pull
Rod Langway	- shoulder AND knee surgery


Dale Cooper
Center for Seismic Studs		"Dale Hunter is God...
Arlington, VA				    ...but you knew that already"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Pens-4 NStars-1
From: <RAP115@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 19:09:29 EST
Organization: Penn State University

In article <1992Nov11.184033.274@europa.asd.contel.com>, king@ssvax.gte.com
(Larry King) says:
>        3 Goals on only 4 shots.  That is a fairly impressive percentage
  It's more like 2 out of 3.  Lemieux stole a pass with a wide open goal at
the end of the game and breezed in unchallenged to an empty net.  So, if it
wasn't for that, the Penguins would have only taken 3 shots on goal in the
period, which isn't unusual.  Once the Penguins get a lead, most of the time,
they sit on in the 3rd period.  This is how they won in the playoffs, and this
is Scotty's plan.  Before the Pens used to have a 3rd period lead, play
offense and often ended up losing or tying. So, if they shoot while they're
ahead in the 3rd, they try to make it count.
** Rob **
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy)
Subject: Re: U.S. "Dream Team"
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 19:42:44 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.123456.9343@abo.fi> MLINDROOS@finabo.abo.fi (Marcus Lindroos INF) writes:
>I understand why Gerald is against having "Dream Teams" in the
>Olympic hockey tournament. What I fail to see is why Canada has to be at a
>competitive disadvantage if an "open" Olympic tournament becomes reality.
>Every one of the world's top six teams -from Canada to Finland- will start from
>square one because all teams will depend heavily on NHL talent, which means not
>even the Russians or the Czechs will have an edge in preparation this time.
>Nor is the bigger playing surface going to be the huge advantage Gerald seems
>to think. The best Canadian and American players can skate well enough to 
>be able to compete with anyone, and most of them have played in the world
>championships anyway.

What exactly is gained by playing a tournament noone has properly
prepared for...

...it basically just becomes a crapshoot.

The Olympics are supposed to be about competition...not about an
exhibition...which is all the "dream team" Olympics would be.

Gerald
From: p7z092@rick.cs.ubc.ca (Anthony Jang)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Whatever happened to Showdown (was Re: Why tie scores?)
Date: 12 Nov 1992 19:01:52 -0800
Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: gambier.rick.cs.ubc.ca

In article <1992Nov12.223303.20566@news.nd.edu> dnewell@boole.cse.nd.edu (devin newell) writes:
[stuff deleted]
>If they want to end a tie, why don't they pull out some of CBC's SHOWDOWN
>equipment from the 70's - 80's and let a couple players shoot at targets or
>do some timed skating passing drills.

Whatever happened to Showdown?  I used to love watching it.  If memory
serves me correct Terry O'Reilly won it one year.  Am I the only
one in NetLand that would like to see players competing against each
oter one-on-one?

Just my thoughts,
Tony
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: chill@cbnews.cb.att.com (daniel.a.miller)
Subject: Re: IHL parent clubs
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:31:41 GMT

In article <BxK7yK.9qt@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> kellejb2@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Jeff Keller) writes:
>Could someone out there mail me a list of the IHL teams' parent clubs?
>

	Eastern Conference

	Atlantic Division

	Atlanta (Tampa Bay)
	Cleveland (Pittsburgh)
	Cincinnati ( New Jersey)

	Central Division

	Kalamazoo (Minnesota)
	Indianapolis (Chicago)
	Fort Wayne (Winipeg/Detroit)


	Western Conference 

	Midwest Division

	Milwaukee (INDEPENDANT)
	Peoria (St. Louis)
	Kansas City (San Jose)

	Pacific Division

	San Diego (New York Rangers)
	Salt Lake (Calgary)
	Phoenix (Los Angeles)	


	Hope this helps!!!

- Dan
  Wings in 92'-93'
  Da Chill in the ECHL
From: picasso@bass.bu.edu (David Ondzes)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Bad Trades (was Re: ex-Blues team)
Date: 6 Nov 92 20:06:25 GMT
Organization: Wizard on Oz
In-reply-to: p7z092@rick.cs.ubc.ca's message of 6 Nov 92 19:07:40 GMT


   >>The is a list of ex-blues players scattered around the league. The Blues
   >>should have never traded some of them. Those players form a competitive
   >>team (IMO).
   >>
   >>Lines:    Rod Brind'Amour - Adam Oates    - Joey Mullen

   >How do you think Canuck fans feel when they traded Cam Neely?
   >At the time of the trade Neely was my favorite player and I never even
   >heard of Barry Pederson.

   Tony - you forgot to mentioned that the Bruins also got Glen Wesley from
the deal (draft pick) and the Pederson return to the Bruins last year to 
play a couple games.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: franjion@spot.Colorado.EDU (John Franjione)
Subject: Re: Oates-Janney Trade revisited
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 17:40:41 GMT

kim@guppy.uucp (Isaac Kim) writes:

>In article <1992Nov9.235209.19247@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> nlu@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov9.185836.13791@athena.mit.edu> sancho@athena.mit.edu (Scott G Smith) writes:
>>
>>>but i do not think that the trade will help st. louis move any closer to the 
>>>stanley cup now or any time within the next ten years
>>
>>If it helps St. Louis, it's a good trade, no matter what happens to St. Louis
>>in the next X years.  If St. Louis trades Curtis Joseph for Patrick Roy, it
>>will probably still not win a Cup, but that doesn't mean that it would be a
>>bad trade to trade Joseph for Roy.
>>
>Nelson, the whole point of making trades is to try to
>optimize your teams chances of winning the Stanley Cup,
>either immediately or in the near future.  If a trade makes
>a team a slightly better team winning percentage wise, but
>does not help the team WIN THE CUP, I would think that it
>would not be considered a good trade.

By this criterion, the Boston Bruins have not made any good trades for
20 years, since they haven't won a Stanley Cup since 1972.

Was the trade of Pederson for Neely and a draft pick (Wesley) a bad
trade because the Bruins haven't won a Cup since?

John Franjione
Organization: The American University - University Computing Center
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 13:26:39 EST
From: Larissa A. Cason <LCASON@auvm.american.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject:    CCHA TV Schedule

If anyone knows the schedule of the Games of the Week that the CCHA
Television Network will be showing, please e-mail it to me at
LCASON@auvm.american.edu

Thanks-
Larissa
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Another bad Kings trade...
From: jmarold@netlink.cts.com (Jeff Marold)
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 92 17:36:05 PST
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA

traded him.
890491g@dragon.acadiau.ca (Don Graves) writes:

> mre@teal.Eng.Sun.COM (Mike Eisler) writes:
> 
> >In article <1992Nov6.062900.2245@unisol.com> haral@unisol.com (Haral Tsitsiv
> >>The Kings's new GM has just proven that he can be worse than his predecesso
> >>by trading Peter Ahola for Jeff Chychrun.  Peter Ahola lead the Kings last 
> >>season with a +12 and his reward is a one-way ticket to Pittsburgh!!!  ....
> 
> >His reward might just be a Stanley Cup ring. I doubt he's complaining.
> >	-mre
> 
> 	What happened to Rogie Vachon?
> 
> -- 
> Don Graves (don.graves@dragon.acadiau.ca)
> Acadia University,
> Wolfville, N.S. Canada


--                    
INTERNET:  jmarold@netlink.cts.com (Jeff Marold)
UUCP:   ...!ryptyde!netlink!jmarold
NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: pavalin@bnr.ca (Paul Valin)
Subject: Re: Ottawa Questions
Followup-To: rec.sport.hockey
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 14:07:39 GMT

Scott Simpson wrote:
> 
>BRENT COLE PERRY writes:
>>	2.  Where are minor league teams for the Senators?
> 
>The only minor league team is the New Haven Senators.

Isn't Thunder Bay of the Colonial League an affiliate of the 
Senators as well?

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Valin                                     Tel: + 1 613 763 7394
Bell-Northern Research Ltd.                    Email: pavalin@bnr.ca
P.O. Box 3511, Station C
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4H7               'only my opinions...'
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: (Gerry Gryschuk)
Subject: Re: Rules question - Instant Replay
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 02:24:31 GMT

From article <ragraca.721662617@vela>, by ragraca@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Randy A. Graca):
> 
> The incident was this:  The Wings scored, but the light did not go on,
> nor did the ref signal that a goal was scored.  Of course, play
> continued, and at the next stoppage in play, the instant replay was
> employed and showed conclusively that it was indeed a score, so the
> Wings were awarded the goal.
> 
> My question is, what would have happened if the Wings' opponent had
> scored in the intervening time between the original goal and the next
> stoppage when the replay was reviewed?  Would such a goal be allowed?
> What if the Wings scored again during that interval?

I believe the goal your talking about was against Montreal, at least the
Det. - Mont. game had such a play. When I saw the play I was wondering
exactly the same thing as you. Interestingly the only thing that would
be logical would for any subsequent goals to also count otherwise what
would be the point of continueing play? Unfortunately I don't know if
this is the answer to your question sorry, just because its logical doesn't
mean that's the way the rules are written.

If indeed both goals would count that would make for an interesting
trivia question, "What's the only way to have back to back goals scored
without an intervening face off at center ice?."
--
Gerald Gryschuk            Saskatoon,Saskatchewan = a place with 9 months
gerry@sask.usask.ca           of hockey and 3 months of poor skating.
Go Habs!!!		              (The Bum rules!!!)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: U.S. "Dream Team"
From: caldwell8102@mtroyal.ab.ca
Date: 6 Nov 92 12:49:01 MST
Organization: Mount Royal College, Calgary, Alberta

In article <1992Nov5.045158.13588@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca>, cs902159@ariel.yorku.ca (DAVID A LISOGURSKI) writes:
> USA:
> 
> Roenick     LaFontaine     K.Stevens
>      Leetch        Housley(or Chelios)
>            Richter(or Beezer)

Stevens is a left wing, so I'd switch him and Roenick. Otherwise, this looks
like a dynamite line.

> CANADA:
> 
> Muller      Lemieux        Messier(or Sakic)
>      MacInnis      Stevens
>            Roy

I'd much rather have Robitaille than Muller on my left wing. Also, you can't
forget Wayne Gretzky. He should be healthy by February '94, and he has always 
stated that the one thing he'd like to do before retiring is play in the 
Olympics. 

I'd probably also take Paul Coffey (even if he IS old) instead of Stevens.
                  
> SOVIET:
> 
> Kamensky    Mogilny        Bure
>      ????           ???
>            ???
>                 

Fedorov instead of Kamensky. Mogilny-Fedorov-Bure was the best junior aged 
line in the world four years ago. On defence, guys like Malakhov and Zhitnik
come to mind. I think Kasparaitus is Lithuanian though...In net, Andrei
Trefilov or Artur Irbe. (Is Irbe Russian?)

> I know, I'm missing a lot of players, and I may be biased about
> others, but this is just off the top of my head.
> 
> Any other ideas?

You forgot the Czech team. How about:

Holik   Reichel    Jagr
   Svoboda    Hamrlik
         Hasek

I'm sure our Swedish and Finnish friends can come up with a good first line
for their respective teams....

								Alan

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: gerry@skatter.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Rules question - Instant Replay
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 02:34:02 GMT

From article <gf0xBN_00aPCIdwkd3@cs.cmu.edu>, by Thomas.Sullivan@cs.cmu.edu:
>> Excerpts from netnews.rec.sport.hockey: 13-Nov-92 Rules question -
>> Instant Re.. Randy A. Graca@vela.acs. (735)
> 
>> My question is, what would have happened if the Wings' opponent had
>> scored in the intervening time between the original goal and the next
>> stoppage when the replay was reviewed?  Would such a goal be allowed?
>> What if the Wings scored again during that interval?
> 
>> Thanks in advance,
> 
>> Randy
> 
> I believe the original goal in question would have been awarded and 
> anything after that disallowed, no matter which team scored.  A faceoff
> at center ice would resume play.

I made another post stating this to be illogical. Thinking more on it
though, maybe it isn't really illogical since what if a team scores
immediately on a rebound after a "disallowed" goal? It would be pretty
cheap to give them two goals on one play. But then this brings up
the question, is the clock reset to the time the goal was scored?

If the clock wasn't reset that would be pretty cheap also.
--
Gerald Gryschuk            Saskatoon,Saskatchewan = a place with 9 months
gerry@sask.usask.ca           of hockey and 3 months of poor skating.
Go Habs!!!		              (The Bum rules!!!)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: jca2@cec1.wustl.edu (Joseph Charles Achkar)
Subject: Re: FLYERS notes 11/9
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 07:03:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.191308.5386@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> seth@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (peter.r.clark..jr) writes:
>
>
>BLUES 6, FLYERS 4.
>That's all I remember except that I think the FLYERS tied it at 3 in the
>second only to see the Blues score 3 fast ones in the third. 
>
Actually the FLYERS led 3-2. 

>FLYERS 4, Blues 2. Finally a game still fresh in my memory banks.
>
>Eric Lindros got into his first regular season NHL fight, and he pounded
>some poor Blues winger. 
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It was Blues defenseman Lee Norwood.

>pete clark - rsh FLYERS contact

  %*%*%*%**%*%%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*
  *   __  ______________         ____________________________________    % 
  %   \ \_)____________/         A L L E Z   L E S   B L U E S  ! ! !    * 
  *    \    __________/          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    % 
  %     \    ________/                                                 	 *
  *      \   _______/                  Joe                               % 
  %       \  \         	               Contact for the Blues             *
  *        \  \  SAINT LOUIS           jca2@cec1.wustl.edu               % 
  %        (___)             BLUES                                       * 
  *%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*% 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: jpc@philabs.philips.com (John P. Curcio;6442;3.55;)
Subject: Re: Possible 1994 Olympic Hockey Rosters
Organization: Philips Laboratories, Briarcliff Manor, NY.
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 13:41:31 GMT

In article <1dappmINNd2k@network.ucsd.edu> kim@guppy.uucp (Isaac Kim) writes:
>In two years, alot of things can happen (Gretzky retires, Mario's back goes
>out etc, etc) but here are possible hockey rosters for the 1994 Winter Olympics
>(if the NHL lets them go):

[...]

>CIS:

[names deleted]

I was under the impression that the CIS team was a one-shot deal for
the 1992 Olympics, since there wasn't much time after the Soviet Union
break-up to reorginize the countries into distince entities.
Therefore, there should be no CIS team; rather, there should be
representative teams from each of the breakaway republics.  Add to that
the fact that there is a planned separation of Czechoslovakia into two
distinct republics (I may be mistaken on the exact facts here-- if
anyone is following the politics maybe they can better inform me), then
the whole Olympic hockey world as we know it will be completely
changed.

Comments, anyone?

-JPC


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John P. Curcio 		          Go Bruins!		   Philips Laboratories
jpc@philabs.philips.com 			           345 Scarborough Road
(914) 945-6442               	 		     Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
From: khansen@staff.tc.umn.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Details on Dan Quinn Allegations
Date: 13 Nov 92 17:36:06 GMT
Article-I.D.: news2.1992Nov13.173606.2388
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Minnesota


According to Friday's (11/13) Minneapolis StarTribune, the unnamed player who
was with Dan Quinn when the rape took place was Mario Lemieux.  The incident
occurred in his room and he was the Pen who stopped the other woman from
trying to stop Quinn.

This 'rumor' was being spread around the Twin Cities media on Tuesday
evening (the day Quinn was charged).  It was just released to the public 
today.

-------------------------------------
Kevin Hansen
MN Twin Family Study - U of MN
khansen@epx.cis.umn.edu - (612)626-7224
-------------------------------------
From: chrisl@balsam.ppc.ubc.ca (Chris Lynch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Fuhr a cheerleader?(was:Re: SABRES Update: Malarchuk, Fuhr
Date: 11 Nov 1992 17:27:58 GMT
Organization: University of B.C.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: balsam.ppc.ubc.ca

In article <1992Nov10.222642.9981@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, nlu@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu) writes:
|> In article <1992Nov10.125348.26236@r-node.gts.org> shadow@r-node.gts.org (Jay Chu) writes:
|> 
|> >This trade will not happen because the Leafs are playing great!  Why break
|> >up the team chemistry when they are winning.  If they are in a losing streak,
|> >it'll be a  different story.
|> 
|> HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!
|> 
|> So, you mean, an injured goalie, who had nothing to do with the upsurge of the
|> team thus far, if traded, would break up the team chemistry?  Gosh.  That Grant
|> Fuhr must be a hell of a cheerleader!
|> 
|> Nelson Lu (claudius@leland.stanford.edu)

Nelson, Nelson. I know you mildly dislike Grant Fuhr, but please don't let it cloud
your judgement. If the Leafs were to trade Fuhr, they would get a forward, no 
doubt, and his insertion to the Leafs lineup could cause a chemistry mess, perhaps.

I believe this is a valid concern, as often a new arrival, given lots of icetime, can
upset some other players on the team. How good Fuhr looks in a short skirt with
pompoms is beyond me......:)

Chris
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: nlu@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu)
Subject: Re: Best Lines?
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 20:12:53 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.183155.9934@odin.corp.sgi.com> rickc@wrigley.corp.sgi.com (Richard Casares) writes:
>One of my pals was boasting that the Sandstrom line in LA was
>the 4th best line in hockey.
>
>Given that Pittsburgh has the best two (heh heh), what would be
>some possible 3rd's?

I definitely disagree that Pittsburgh has the best two (they might have the
best one, but that is something else), but what about LaLine
(Dave Andreychuk-Pat LaFontaine-Alexander Mogilny)?

===============================================================================
"M. C. Hamrlik: Can't Touch This Lightning."
GO LOS ANGELES KINGS!  Luc Robitaille for Hart!
GO SAN JOSE SHARKS!  Sandis Ozolinsh for Calder!  Jeff Hackett for Vezina!
===============================================================================
Nelson Lu (claudius@leland.stanford.edu)
rec.sport.hockey contact for the San Jose Sharks
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: bart@splunge.uucp (Barton Oleksy)
Subject: Re: RANGERS NEWS: VanBiesbrouck hurt, trade rumors...
Organization: Ashley, Howland & Wood
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 04:33:46 GMT

jpc@philabs.philips.com (John P. Curcio) writes:

>In article <1992Nov4.150255.24025@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> romano@monolith.bellcore.com (Paul C. Romano) writes:

>>	Latest trade rumors have RANGERS forward Dave Archibald (who 
>>has yet to play this season) going to Ottawa for a draft choice, or
>>going to Hartford along with other players for defenseman Zarley 
>>Zalapski and others......

>Just when you thought the Rangers had a problem with their defense,
>they look to make it bigger.....  Seriously, do they realize what they
>are doing?  Zalapski is a fairly decent defenseman, but his is
>offensive-minded, just like James Patrick and Brian Leetch.  The
>Rangers need defensive help, since Cirella and Hardy are aging traffic
>cones.  They should pursue a good stay-at-home defenseman...

Like, for example, Kevin Lowe?

Bart, Edmonton, Alberta Canada
bart@splunge.uucp
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey