HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Is Pat Robertson for real??
Date: 28 Aug 92 00:16:57 GMT
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison


In article <1992Aug27.195209.157316@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>
dh0a@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (DONALD L.  HARDY) writes:

>The complete text of a hate letter from the self styled "Public Advocate of
>the United States."

Please make sure the subject line indicates clearly that
it's hate mail you're posting; many people do not want to
see that bilge here at all.  It would be considerate to put
a warning on it if you really intend to post it.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton)
Subject: Fingernail Polish (was Re: The Silent Majority (was: other stuff))
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 02:21:17 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <1992Aug26.004948.11893@spdcc.com> rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue) 
writes:
>
>I mean
>we have so many things we could talk about instead, like which
>nail polish colours are going to be "in" this Fall! 

So, don't keep us in suspense!  What are they?  Black is passe, red is
boring, neon is too valley.  Maybe it's time for iridescents again. 

-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Hamilton   jfh@netcom.com   P. O. Box 281107   SF, CA   94128-1107
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com (Jake Coughlin)
Subject: Re: Too straight looking to be gay
Originator: jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 92 16:04:09 GMT
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research

vanyel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alan Williams):
> I don't like "nelly" behavior.  Period.  I've received nothing on here to
> suggest that I *should*--only flames for not thinking like *you*.  When
> I've tried to support my position and clarify it further, it's
> "backtracking."  If I bring anything up regarding *your* unwillingness to
> hear what *I* have to say, I'm a "whiner."

whine, whine, whine... poor thing, why don't you, boob, and melon
take your nail polish and play in another sandbox?
-- 
Jason Coughlin ( jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com )
Queer Without A Cause!
"I find myself suddenly in the world, and I recognize that I have one
right alone: that of demanding human behavior of the other." -- Fanon
From: randyc@autodesk.com (Randy Clark)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Prediction of the Republican National Convention
Date: 29 Aug 92 01:03:32 GMT
Organization: Autodesk, Inc., Sausalito, CA


In article <-2cnh#=.stephena@netcom.com> stephena@netcom.com (Stephen Arrants) writes:
>In article <17548@autodesk.COM> randyc@autodesk.com (Randy Clark) writes:
>>
>>	Cruel?  
>>	Televising Son of Nurnberg last week was cruel
>>	enough.
>>
>
>I heard it described as "The live-action version of Orwell's _Animal Farm_."

	Oh, that's even better!

	Thank you.

	I wish I could add something pithy about the convention
	(rather than just sardonic), but part of the horror I
	feel is that I am *not* surprised in the least.  In a
	way, it's the most honest thing the GOP has done in years.

	-R


--
There is a sad gaiety in our love, and though we have more wit
than Sunday lovers by the water's edge, our wit attracts misfortune.
							-- Genet
Randy Clark			{}!autodesk.com!randyc
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: bobsarv@microsoft.com (Bob Sarver)
Subject: Re: Gay Homophobia (was Re: Too straight looking to be gay???) (was re: UNGAY GAY)
Date: 24 Aug 92 01:22:10 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.


(Arne)
>/The only thing keeping closeted gay men in the closet is the 
>/closeted gay men themselves.
>
(me)
>Right.  And the only thing keeping rape victims from coming forward
>is themselves.  Not the bad media press, not the slanted judicial
>system, not the public humiliation, nosiree.  Nothing else; it's their 
>own fault, and what other people do doesn't impact their decision
>one whit.

(twpierce)
/That would be a really cool analogy, but only if you think that rape
/survivors who go public, flaunt their experiences all over the news,
/shove their sex lives down the throats of regular Americans, etc. make
/it more difficult for normal-acting rape survivors.


You missed it again, Tim.  You are either reading too fast or deliberately
missing the point.

1.  Arne decides that closeted gays have no excuse to be closeted; it's
    their own fault.
2.  I ask Arne, "Does it have to be difficult for them, or can we make it
    easier?"
3.  Arne says that it's entirely dependent on the closeted gays.
4.  I ask Arne, "If that's the case, then the only thing keeping rape 
    victims in the closet are themselves.  Not the bad press, not the
    public spotlight, oh no.  None of these other things impacts their
    decision in any way whatsoever."  The idea was to get Arne to realize
    that people count the costs of their actions, and sometimes the costs
    are deemed too high.  



No one was  discussing "normal acting vs. non-normal acting" rape
survivors. 

The question was of whether or not *any* external forces 
can influence a hard decision,(since Arne didn't seem to think so).

Now, what does your comment have to do with this?
From: nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Misogyny, language.
Date: 28 Aug 92 08:25:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Aug28.082554.1259
Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR

When I first came to college (3 years ago), I was not.. very well
educated about women. (this is an awkward phrasing, and I apologize
for it.)

I'd picked up some really noxious habits. Women were "girls", or if I
was being friendly or offhand they were "chicks". I didn't intend any
insult in using these terms, but oh Lord how they were insulting.

But I was really fortunate in receiving a gentle education on the
proper mode of address. I can't remember who all corrected me, those
first few weeks, to refer to my female colleages as "women".

I can remember my first Reed lover telling me once "Nelson, you just
*can't* call women 'chick'.". And I remember three women at Reed's
Lesbian Gay Bisexual Union who would, every single time I referred to
someone there as "girl", politely but firmly and immediately say
"women", interrupting me.

I was annoyed for awhile, of course, but I eventually retrained
myself. Then I thought about it for awhile, and started asking some of
the proper questions, and I began to understand a little of the
misogyny I had inherited growing up as a teenager in the 1980s.

In learning a little about one minor facet of disrespect for women
(referring to adults in the diminutive), I learned something about how
I perceived women in general. And in that, I learned something of how
women are mistreated in America.

Amazing what you can learn with a little help and an open mind.
-- 
                __
nelson@reed.edu \/   Indifference, the plague that moves throughout this land
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: doug@cc.ysu.edu (Doug Sewell)
Subject: Re: Gai Pied news items, 30th July 1992
Organization: Bush in 92 ? NOT!
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 17:40:32 GMT

shore@dinah.tc.cornell.edu (Melinda Shore) writes:
: -- 
: "I would promptly inform any homosexual who would dare to proposition
: me that my preference is fisting."  -- Theodore A. Kaldis
: 

Uggh.  The thought of T*d in a sling is enough to retire my gloves for
good.  Unless, of course, his buddy Clayton is there to do the honors.
--
Doug Sewell, Tech Support, Computer Center, Youngstown State University
doug@cc.ysu.edu	   doug@ysub.bitnet	<internet>!cc.ysu.edu!doug
Family Values: the sexist, racist, homophobic, classist, "Christian" values
of the 50's.
From: drp@dosbears.UUCP (David R. Preston)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: gay liberation
Date: 26 Aug 92 22:20:38 GMT
Reply-To: drp@dosbears.uucp
Organization: DosBears

In article <l913vdINN9ro@mizar.usc.edu> adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:
>In article <7=0m2-b.jfh@netcom.com> jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton) writes:
>
>>  A friend of mine and I spent hours giggling over it,
>> particularly the description of a typical homosexual love scene: 
>>
>>   A:  Shove it deeper, master!
>>   B:  Take it, you bitch! 
>
>You mean that's *not* typical?

Of course not. It's the usually the other around:

	A:  Shove it deeper, you bitch!
	b:  Take it, master!

--
         David R. Preston   drp@dosbears.uucp dosbears@netcom.com
              Information gladly given but safety requires
               the avoidance of unnecessary conversation.
            D. R. Preston 584 Castro St. #614 SF CA 94114 USA
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: buckmr@aix.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire)
Subject: Re: Is Pat Robertson for real??
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 22:34:11 GMT

dh0a@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (DONALD L. HARDY) writes:

>This was on another board:

>Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson...is actively campaigning against the
>Iowa's proposal to put the Equal Rights Amendment on their state
>constitution. Wire reports reports (sic)(?) he said in a letter last month
>that the ERA is part of a "feminist agenda" that "is not about equal rights
>for women." Instead, he wrote, "it is about a socialist, anti-family
>political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their
>children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians."
Yes, this was posted to soc.motss on Monday, I believe, by  Ken Dykes.
It also is in the Wednesday LA TIMES in *three* places, Editorial, A  section
news story and in a commentary by Tim Rutten.

>I wouldn't believe this, though I'd believe just about ANYTHING of the
-- 
RON BUCKMIRE, 11 Colvin Circle, Troy, NY 12180-3735. "D.C. in '93!"
vox:(518)-276-8910 fax:(518)-276-6920 buckmr@rpi.edu buckmr@rpitsmts.bitnet
"A visceral recoil from homosexuality is the natural reaction of a healthy
society wishing to preserve itself." Pat Buchanan, March 27, 1991, N.Y. POST
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: elle@kimbark.uchicago.edu (Ellen Keyne Seebacher)
Subject: Come out!  come out!  (was Re: Barbara Bush is a ...)
Reply-To: elle@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 15:15:15 GMT

ST402341@brownvm.brown.edu (Gary Byma) writes something which U.S.
  citizens (among others) should consider very carefully:

>I should note that while my mother was not thrilled with the news
>when I came out to her just a few months ago, she has since come
>a long way, and sees the gay-bashing by the supposed Christian
>religious right, as pure hate. Recognizing her desire for my
>happiness gives her a different perspective on the rights of all
>gays to lead happy and complete lives.

National Coming Out Day, in the U.S., is October 11.

If each of you reading this newsgroup comes out to just one person who
might otherwise consider voting for Bashing Bush because they "don't
know any gay people" (Justice Powell's excuse for voting with the
majority in Bowers vs. Hardwick), we have the potential to swing tens
of thousands of votes.

In a close election, _you_ might make the difference.

--
Ellen Keyne Seebacher            elle@midway.uchicago.edu
  "Pat Buchanan as a keynote speaker?  Pat Buchanan?  I guess the Republicans
   had to settle for Buchanan because they couldn't get the speaker they
   really wanted.  Monday must be Satan's bowling night."  --Arsenio Hall
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Gravely Mixed Up
Date: 31 Aug 92 17:50:32 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison


In article <4997@news.duke.edu> John_Graves@cellbio.duke.edu
writes:

>>>While I have chided you on religious issues before, I don't
>>>in any manner wish to discriminate against you because of
>>>your nonreligious (what I would call religious) beliefs.

>The context here, if you remember, was in a private letter
>to you, in which I was referring humorously to previous
>letters in which you said that you had no religious beliefs.

It's too dreary to go looking for the proof, but I am quite
certain I have never said in letters or in postings that I
had no religious beliefs.

>So, I'm not going to discriminate against your
>"non-religious" type of religious beliefs, i.e.  I will not
>hold it against you that you do not see yourself as
>"religious."

*You* will define my beliefs?  That's beyond belief!!

If you think I don't see myself as relgious, you're dreaming;
I've said I do, more than once, and in this forum, so don't break
your arm not holding it against me.

You have a bizarre mind, my friend.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: wlp@calmasd.Prime.COM (Walt  Peterson)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Tangled Family Trees (was Re: Redefining Self)
Date: 4 Sep 92 15:59:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: calmasd.4977
Organization: Computervision, A Prime Company. San Diego R&D

}Once my mother's father's mother and my mother's mother's father were dead,
}my mother's father's father married my mother's mother's mother and proceeded
}to have several children.  Three generations on, none of us have *yet*
}figured out what relationship they are to us.  My mother's family tree looks
}more like a topiary. 
}


Step-second cousins once removed, I think.


-- 
Walter L. Peterson                    |                 ______
Internet   : wlp@calmasd.Prime.COM    |       Silence   \    /   Action
CompuServe : 70441,3177               |          =       \  /      =
"Generic Disclaimer"                  |        Death      \/      Life
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: emcmanus@gr.osf.org (Eamonn McManus)
Subject: Forty years a queen
Organization: Open Software Foundation Research Institute, Grenoble
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 09:40:46 GMT

I wrote:
>>   the museum was counting on the sale of T-shirts with the inscription
>>   "Queen for 40 years", but the authorities made them withdraw them
>>   from sale, for fear that they would become the emblem of
>>   quadragenarian queers!  _Shocking_!
>>   [The T-shirt inscription is rendered as "Une reine de 40 ans"
>>   without saying what it was in English, so I am guessing.]

roger@quantime.co.uk (Roger Phillips) writes:
>The wording was "Forty years a queen."

Does this mean that you know more details of this bizarre case?  For
instance, who were the authorities in question, and are they usually
this stupid?

,
Eamonn
From: zwicky@erg.sri.com (Elizabeth Zwicky)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Fingernail Polish
Date: 26 Aug 92 23:02:26 GMT
Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park, CA

One summer when I was feeling whimsical, I painted my fingernails
almost every day. Alternating blue and green; all black with purple
sparkles on one hand and rainbow sparkles on the other; counterchanged
schemes; in general, anything that involved a nail polish scheme that
could not have been mistaken for an attempt to be stylish. The office
weathered this pretty well. People did comment on it, with attitudes
of mild puzzlement, but not terribly often.

After about a month of this, I came to work one day with a purple
dress, purple fingernails, and a purple streak in my hair. Shock!
Horror! Amazement! One of our hardware people told me, more in sorrow
than in anger, that I had always seemed like such a *sensible* person
before. I was more than a little bemused. Blue and green sparkly
fingernails is sensible, even when you're wearing red shorts and a
yellow shirt, but a restrained purple stripe in your hair that matches
your clothes is not? 

	Elizabeth Zwicky
	zwicky@erg.sri.com
From: dh0a@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (DONALD L. HARDY)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Quayles meet Usenet (was Re: PLEASE VOTE!!!)
Date: 3 Sep 92 12:56:08 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

>>Just wait till he gets a look at alt.fan.dan-quayle, not to mention
>>all the sex, drugs, religion and politics newsgroups.  (And need I even
>>mention soc.motss and soc.bi?)  We may very well hear rhetoric about
>>netnews in the campaign this fall.
>
>Most Lehigh students don't have access to _any_ alt groups.  They give
>everyone on campus an account, but that machine is (OOOHHH!) censored.

I asked about alt.boards.  They "...don't support them because we don't think
they're informational enough..."  or some such reason.

Oh well.
-- 

******************************************************************************

Donald L. Hardy                                    Office of Physical Planning
Project Planner                                    Lehigh University
dh0a@lehigh.edu                                    (215) 758 5110
From: psp@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (P.S. Powledge)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Gai Pied news items, 30th July 1992
Date: 2 Sep 92 21:32:04 GMT
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ

In article <3=xy1v@rpi.edu> buckmr@vccsouth21.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire) writes:
>emcmanus@gr.osf.org (Eamonn McManus) writes:
>
>>SUCCESS FOR DENEUVE
>
>>  _DeNeuve_, the most important magazine for American Lesbians, has
>>  just celebrated its first anniversary, in San Francisco.  According
>>  to its directors, the monthly has attracted in a year more than
>>  78,000 readers.  Flushed with its success, _DeNeuve_ should be
>>  turning its attention more to the international market.
>
>>  [Why have I never heard of this magazine here?  Is it just me?]

Me neither.

>The magazine was featured in a little NEWSWEEK gossip piece a few months ago
>because it was one of the fastest growing magazines in the Country at that time.

Ah, that explains it: I live in the Suburbs.

-- 
				||| Polly Powledge
				||| Internet: P.S.Powledge@ATT.COM
				||| Uucp:     att!hrmso!psp
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: georgere@microsoft.com (George V. Reilly)
Subject: The Life of Reilly
Date: 04 Sep 92 02:25:35 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation
	<1992Sep3.145429.22803@osf.org>
	<1992Sep3.155447.23636@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>

ry@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (ryerson.schwark) writes:
) coren@osf.org (Robert Coren) writes:
) > georgere@microsoft.com (George V. Reilly) writes, wrily:
) > > Or Wreilly...
) >Oh, rielly?
) No. its "O o o o oooooohhhh! Reilly!"

Oh, Ry!  Leeeeeeeeeeeeead us into temptation.

But remember: don't rile Reilly by calling him O'Reilly.
________________
George V. Reilly   <GeorgeRe@Microsoft.Com>
From: rogerk@queernet.org (Roger B.A. Klorese)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Question about Microsoft Corp.
Date: 28 Aug 92 15:57:39 GMT
Organization: QueerNet

In article <1992Aug27.165953.8277@microsoft.com> bobsarv@microsoft.com (Bob Sarver) writes:
>/well, i'd rather work for IBM than get stuck next to Bob Sarver.
>I'd rather you work there, too, Jake.  It's good for the price of 
>my stock.

Oh, you own IBM stock, Bob?
-- 
ROGER B.A. KLORESE                                              +1 415 ALL-ARFF
rogerk@unpc.QueerNet.ORG                 {ames,decwrl,pyramid}!mips!unpc!rogerk
"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from."
                                                                   -- J. Foster
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: The Silent Majority (was: other stuff)
From: mike@batpad.lgb.ca.us (mike batchelor)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 20:01:53 PDT
Distribution: world               
Organization: The Batchelor Pad

mattm@Apple.COM (Matthew Melmon) writes:
>
> 
> I just that delicious little lad from Reed would post more often.
> Nelson, isn't it?  He sounds, in a word:
> 
> *yummy*
> 
> If my opinions were Apple's, I'd be driving a shiny car, too
> 
> (but they might just agree with me on this one...)


He *is* yummy.  I have the GIF.



[] ---
[] Mike Batchelor -- mike@batpad.lgb.ca.us
[] Long Beach, California
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: kls4344@ritvax.isc.rit.edu (Person in flux)
Subject: Re: Markus Goes Amerika - A Travelogue (Part 4 of 4)
Reply-To: kls4344@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 11:55:53 GMT

In article <1992Aug24.141058.939@ifi.unizh.ch>, kiser@ifi.unizh.ch 
(Markus Kiser) writes:
>[This is part 4, the last part, of my travelogue.]

>And, I'll come back.

I hope so!  And thank you for that wonderful travelogue; I enjoyed reading
about the United States through the eyes of a European who'd never been here
before.

Katie
From: mdrayton@sr.hp.com (Mike Drayton)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Is Pat Robertson for real??
Date: 28 Aug 92 18:20:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: scd.BtpHMH.6uG
Distribution: usa
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara Division
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1.1 PL5

Jess Anderson (anderson@macc.wisc.edu) wrote:
> 
>    Subject: Pat Robertson Dies in Mystery Motel
>    Subject: Pat Robertson and Jimmy Swaggert in Love Tryst
>    Subject: Messiah Returns: Pat Robertson Fried
>    Subject: Pat Robertson Has Lockjaw
>    Subject: Queer Nation Recruits Pat Robertson
>    Subject: Robertson Dejected by Flock's Rebuff
>    Subject: Pat Robertson is Really Elvis on Pulpit
>    Subject: Flying Saucer Abducts Preacher Robertson
----------------
There's a high-paying career with great advancement potential 
awaiting you at the _National Enquirer_.  Dial 1-800-ALL-RITE. 
See the latest issue of OUT/LOOK for more in the same vein.

Mike Drayton
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: bobsarv@microsoft.com (Bob Sarver)
Subject: Re: On accuracy and anderson
Date: 02 Sep 92 00:05:29 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.
Keywords: In error?  *moi*?



/(mattm)
/And perhaps someone else had brought this to Mr. Anderson's attention
/as well; I don't remember apologizing for the observation.

Let me get this straight:  anderson claims that, in an private email 
conversation with you, that you apologized to him for making this claim
(this, in spite of him trying to flame me for quoting unsubstantiatable
emails).

Now, however, you publicly state that you made no such apology.



Does that make anderson a liar?
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: henry@ADS.COM (Henry Mensch)
Subject: Re: Folsom ST Fair
Organization: Advanced Decision Systems; a div of Booz, Allen & Hamilton
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 21:28:02 GMT

dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) wrote: 
->In article <65060@cup.portal.com> Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison) writes:
->>Totally wrong.  I just don't like *SZECHUAN* food, and I see no
->>reason whatsoever for soc.motss gatherings to be locked into one
->>particular cuisine.
->
->Dim Sum restaurants have the advantage of enormous seating arrangements
->at least.  I'd be game for anything, of course. :-)

not only that, but dim sum doesn't have to be particularly szechuan.

--
# henry mensch / booz, allen & hamilton, inc.  / <henry@ads.com>
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: buckmr@aix.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire)
Subject: Re: Does History Repeat Itself?
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 22:54:19 GMT

rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue) writes:

>foster@convex.com (Harry Foster) writes:

>>Here's an interesting thought from the book: "The Destruction of the
>>European Jews" by Raul Hilber:

>	[Great post - go back and read it in its entirety!]

>	Nail.

>	Head.

>	BANG.

>`	It is as the Buchanan-thing said, a war.
Yup. I believe the current term is ``KulturKampf''.

>	It's about time we started treating it as such.
MOST definitely!
-- 
RON BUCKMIRE, 11 Colvin Circle, Troy, NY 12180-3735. ``D.C., April 25 1993''
vox:(518)-276-8910 fax:(518)-276-6920 buckmr@rpi.edu buckmr@rpitsmts.bitnet
Anne-Imelda Radice, President Bush's appointee to head the National Endowment
for the Arts, has been described as ``the Lesbian Clarence Thomas''.
Xref: sparky soc.motss:38067 ne.motss:475