HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 16:08:39 EST
From:         Jim Jones <JIMJ@JHUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      rejection from att.att.com causes mailing loop

 The following error delivery notice caused a mailing loop on JHUVM's
 Listserv over the weekend.  I've send a note to the postmaster at
 att.com and att.att.com asking for their cooperation in developing
 a way to stop future occurences of this problem.  If any of you
 have mailing lists which utilize the att.att.com gateway machine,
 keep an eye on them.  I don't know if this is a newly implemented
 format for mail delivery errors, or if the conditions that cause it
 to be used are rare.  Listserv eventually caught the loop once the
 "From:" line mutated to 'uucp@att.att.com' (it was xxuucp and inuucp
 at various times during the loop).  Since the original posting wasn't
 included in the error message and the "Subject:" is innocuous, the
 mail got passed all the triggers.

 -jj

 -------- sample error message from att.att.com follows:
Received: by JHUVM (Mailer R2.08 PTF008) id 8028; Sun, 12 Apr 92 13:38:37 EST
Date:         Sun, 12 Apr 1992 13:32:00 EDT
Reply-To:     4ad recording artists list <4AD-L@JHUVM.BITNET>
From:         xxuucp@ATT.ATT.COM
Subject:      UUCP Mail
To:           Jim Jones <JIMJ@JHUVM.BITNET>

UUCP request att!D.att6dc2fe2 to emsp!D.att6dc2fe2
failed on system 'emsp'.
Reason for failure:
        remote system can't create temp file
        remote file system is low on free space
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Thu, 16 Apr 1992 10:56:08 EDT
From:         John Clutcher <JCLUTCHE@PSUHMC.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Bounced mail
              15 Apr 1992 14:23:41 EST from <SPONSELL@AKRONVM.UAKRON.EDU>

On Wed, 15 Apr 1992 14:23:41 EST Gary Sponseller said:
..... stuff deleted .....
>gets purged, we won't know about it.  Perhaps, I should also require
>subscription renewals on a 6-months basis.  (There are no renewals now.)
..... stuff deleted .....

What is the renewal process with Listserv?
How are renewals set-up in the list heading?
Can you specify the number of days until a subscription expires?
Where can I find this information in Listserv documentation?

Thanks for your help!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
John Clutcher, Project Leader/E-mail Postmaster  Information Systems
Internet: jclutche@psuhmc.hmc.psu.edu            Hershey Medical Center
Bitnet:   jclutche@psuhmc.bitnet                 500 University Drive
Voice:    (717) 531-8682                         Hershey, PA 17033  USA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 14:02:41 EDT
From:         "Duane D. Weaver" <WEAVER@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
Subject:      Storing PC binary File in a Filelist
Comments: To: listownl <lstown-l@indycms.BITNET>

The list owner of a local list here at OSU, would like me to setup a
FILELIST for his list.    The owner intends to store PC binary files
which the subscriber can obtain and then down load to their PC or MAC.

Most likely the files will have to be UUENCODEd.

Are there any other pitfalls that I should be aware of?

Since the list owner is not on OHSTVMA, most likely I will have to do
the storing of the files for the owner.   Is that correct?   Way around
this?

Thanks,
Duane

**************

Duane D. Weaver
LISTSERV Postmaster
Senior Systems Programmer
VM Support Group
Ohio State University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 22:13:16 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Database Manuals
              15 Apr 1992 15:11:32 EDT from "Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7"
              <LSTSRV-L@SEARN>

On Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:11:32 EDT Ken Koester <MAINT2@ERS> said:

>Our site could probably use this feature,  but it's going to be tough if
>I don't know how to set up any other kind of database!

LISTSERV  is  not a  professional  database  system  - it  simply  wasn't
designed to let people create arbitrary  databases and build up menus for
data entry and that sort of things. It  can be done, but you have to read
the source code to find out how.

>While I'm at it, other memos I can't find but would like to are:
>M01-002 "List Manager's Guide"
>S01-005 "Maintenance Guide"
>M01-008 "File Maintainer's Guide"
>
>I sort of get the feeling that maybe these items never got finished--I
>hope
>I'm wrong.

From the README file you get with LISTSERV:

3. You were sent  all the documentation that is available.  Some of it is
   obsolete - this is a known problem,  not an error in the generation of
   the package you  were sent. Please do not send  mail to LISTSERV lists
   to  ask for  more  documentation  or for  more  recent  copies of  the
   documentation you  got - what you  have is all that  is available. You
   are however  encouraged to use  the LISTSERV lists (see  below), AFTER
   CHECKING  THEIR  ARCHIVES FOR  POSSIBLE  PREVIOUS  ANSWERS TO  SIMILAR
   QUESTIONS,  if  you   have  any  question  about   LISTSERV  that  the
   documentation does not answer.

For  pointers to  other possible  sources of  documentation, see  posting
number 6203 from  the archives of this list at  SEARN (the posting number
may differ on other peers). There are at least 32 other hits on that same
question in the list archives.

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 13:57:15 EDT
Comments:     Resent-From: Stan Horwitz <OASIS@TEMPLEVM.BITNET>
Comments:     Originally-From: Revised List Processor (1.7b)
              <LISTSERV@TEMPLEVM.BITNET>
From:         Stan Horwitz <OASIS@TEMPLEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Message

Thanks Eric for  the info on setting the cpuid  to fix listserv@templev.  This
was  done  and  over  600   files  were  transferred  there  and  subsiquently
distributed.  A  few dozen MAILDIST files  are still being rejected  for a new
reason though.  I  get a message like  the one below saying  that a particular
destination node is not in our routing  tables.  In the example below, PUCC is
definitely  in our  routing  tables because  its our  direct  link to  Bitnet.
Listserv also complained about WCU and VILLVM.   All three show up when I send
a SHOW command to listserv@templevm.  Is there  any idea on how I can get this
listserv to distribute  the rest of these files?  I  tried rebooting Listserv,
but had no luck there.

Stan Horwitz
Listserv Postmaster
Temple University
Acknowledge to: OASIS@TEMPLEVM (or VM.TEMPLE.EDU)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Received a transferred file from myself, possibly destined to LISTSERV@PUCC.
The destination node ("PUCC" - assuming it  is valid) is probably not in the
routing tables, which you might want to check. The file has been transferred
to OASIS@TEMPLEVM.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 17:12:50 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Internal Error...
              9 Apr 1992 16:10:26 -0500 from "Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7"
              <LSTSRV-L@SEARN>

Usage note 8 of LISTSERV README:

8. LISTSERV's  A-disk will  contain,  after installation,  a file  called
   LISTSERV FILELIST  which is  of crucial importance  and should  not be
   overwritten. If  the userid  of your  server is  LISTSERV and  you use
   FILELIST rather  than FLIST to view  files, be aware of  the fact that
   the FILELIST command may, in certain cases, gladly overwrite this file
   without  prompting you  for confirmation  nor even  notifying you.  In
   particular, typing SAVE or FILE while within FILELIST is a no-no.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computer Network
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:06:05 CDT
From:         Marty Hoag <NU021172@NDSUVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Bounced mail
              15 Apr 1992 14:23:41 EST from <SPONSELL@AKRONVM.UAKRON.EDU>

   Our philosophy on the inane 'after 3 days...' non-helpful messages is to
just make a note of the affected address.  If we get more of those over the
next few days we remove the address from all of our lists.  If the removal
notice happens to get through (we DON'T do a quiet del) it generally gets
the attention of the person at the other end.

   In the Field of Dreams parlance this would be the "Ease my Pain" approach.
If you do nothing to prune your list you will get more and more pain.  We take
a similar approach to other "soft" errors (disk full/quota exceeded).  For
messages which say "no such userid exists" we take their word for it and
nuke the address right away.  But in each case we make a note in a log
(diary) file so if the user asks we can explain what happened and encourage
them to look up the folks who run their system.

       Marty
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 22:07:52 EST
From:         Jim Jones <JIMJ@JHUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Bounced mail

On Wed, 15 Apr 1992 18:36:52 PDT Russell N. Hathhorn, VM Systems Support said:
 ...
>Consequently I shunt via Errors-to= to a separate userid that 'handles the
>problem'(make that purges) this junk.  ...

 If you simply discard error notices as they arrive, then problems that
 crop up may never get resolved.  For example, if an account is removed
 from a system and the address is still on your mailing list, every time
 mail if sent to your list, you're guaranteed to get one bounce.  So if
 nobody ever bothers to look through the error mail, you could end up
 with a large number of bounces per piece of mail posted.  After a few
 years on a large/busy list I can well imagine that you'd receive
 hundreds of bounces.  I have to agree that some lists tend to be
 better behaved than others.  My "recreational" list is by far my worst
 offender in terms of delivery errors too.  But even so, I still read
 all the garbage and try to do *something* with every bounce message I
 receive.  Maybe it just me, but I can't let the network waste resources
 bouncing mail back and forth hoping that the problem is temporary and
 will resolve itself.  That's my primary objection to just letting things
 slide when a delivery error is received.  I try to contact the appropriate
 person(s) and get the problem resolved, and in most cases "NOMAIL" the
 address while the error is being investigated.

>+---------------------------------------------+------------------------------+
>|   Russell N. Hathhorn                       |  Bitnet: SYSMAINT@PCCVM      |

 -jj
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: William Rainey Harper College; Palatine, IL  60067
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 07:56:40 CST
From:         Bob Brown <BBROWN@HARPERVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: 17B-002o: Miscellaneous fixes to CARD for CMS 6-8

On Sun, 5 Apr 1992 02:12:18 +0200 Eric Thomas said:
>YOU ARE  ADVISED TO INSTALL
>THIS FIX  BEFORE LOADING  THE FIX17B1 UPDATE,  or you may  end up  with a
>corrupted LSWCWRT MODULE.
>
Mabe this is what happened to me....  This morning I looked at my LISTSERV
console, and saw messages like:

DMSMOD104S Error 11 reading file LSWCWRT MODULE from disk or directory
    34 *-* 'LSWCWRT INIT'
       +++ RC(-4) +++
6 Apr 1992 00:01:13 Revised LISTSERV, version 1.7b starting...

What do I need to do to repair the damage?

thanks..


-boB

(the fix had already been applied (over the weekend apparently) before I saw
the note about the fix for cms 6,7,8.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
BBROWN@HARPERVM.BITNET     ####  ####    Bob Brown
Harper Community College   ##  ##  ##    Systems Programmer
Palatine IL USA            ####  ####    "...Boink"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 17 Apr 1992 15:09:00 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Planned release date for 1.7c
              16 Apr 1992 15:55:59 EDT from "Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7"
              <LSTSRV-L@SEARN>

On Thu, 16 Apr 1992 15:55:59 EDT Stan Horwitz <OASIS@TEMPLEVM> said:

>What will be the major, if any, new features/changes in 1.7c?

I realize that most people on this list "don't have time" to learn how to
use the database  functions and prefer to ask again  and let other people
do the work for  them and re-post old answers, but  I didn't realize that
"old" really meant 10 days.

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Computing Center, Virginia Tech.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 17 Apr 1992 09:17:02 EDT
From:         Greg Kroll <USDGK@VTVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Netwide deletion
              17 Apr 1992 08:55:34 EDT from <MEHARP01@ULKYVM.LOUISVILLE.EDU>

On Fri, 17 Apr 1992 08:55:34 EDT Michael Harpe said:
>
>How does one setup and execute netwide deletions?  Can some kind soul
>send me an example EXEC?
>

Mike,

  Here is a Command Job Language Interpreter (CJLI) job to do just that.
One warning: You MUST be the registered "Node Administrator" for your site
in order to have this execute successfully.  The CJLI job following
the netwide delete job will tell you who is the NAD for your site.
Good Luck.

--Greg Kroll

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ netwide delete ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
//Cleanup    JOB  Echo=No
QUIET Delete * DD=Names ( NETWIDE
//Names DD *
<userid>@<node>
/*
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Note: Replace <userid> and <node> with as many user's as you wish to delete.
Each on a separate line.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++ display node administrator ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
//NodEntry JOB Echo=No
Database Search DD=Rules
//Rules DD   *
Search * in BITEARN where node = <node>
PRINT CONTACT
//NodEntry EOJ
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


--Greg Kroll
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 17 Apr 1992 08:09:55 EST
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Re: Maintaining a FILELIST via e-mail
Comments: To: "Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7" <LSTSRV-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
              16 Apr 1992 12:38:29 EDT from <USDGK%VTVM1.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu>

Greg,
  Well, I am getting further toward the goal, but have the following
problem (the listserv running this is at 1.7b);

------------------------------ problem follows --------------------------
> PUT veggie recipes1 granola "TITLE=Vegetarian recipes on GRANOLA
This is not the proper way to store files - you must send your request along
with the  replacement file, placing the  PUT command in the  first record of
the file (before the data you want  to store). Another possibility is to use
the LSVPUT user interface, if you are running VM/CMS.

> =============================================================================
==
Unknown command -- "===========================================================
====================". Try HELP.

All subsequent commands have been flushed.
------------------------------- problem above ---------------------------

what follows are the first lines of the note sent that returned
the above error;

-------------------------- note with listserv job ------------------
From:         Scott Mattes <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
To:           listserv@brownvm.brown.edu

PUT veggie recipes1 granola PW=xxxxx "TITLE=Vegetarian recipes on GRANOLA"
===============================================================================
 Date:         Wed, 18 Apr 90 23:16:33 EDT
....... about 3000 lines following this deleted .........
-------------------------- note with listserv job ------------------

  I have even submitted this job making sure the line of =s did not
start in column 1 (just picking at straws).

  Thanks for the help.

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: LSTSRV-L@RUTVM1.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 13:39:23 -0400
From:         ALVALENT@HUSC.BITNET
Subject:      Looking for an open mail serving site

I am the current Sys Admin for a mailing list for the Ravenloft AD&D campaign
set.  In addition to this narrow field we also carry on discussion about
gothic novels and film in general.  We are working on a small system right
now which is filling up fast.  We will probably not need to transfer our
whole list over, just new subscribers.  If anyone has any open space on their
node or knows of someone who does, please contact me about this subject.

Thank you

Lee Valentine
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Instituto Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Queretaro
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 11:59:29 CST
From:         "Juan M. Courcoul" <COURCOUL@VMTECQRO.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Change in the default value of MAIL-VIA for release 1.7c

Just to clarify a minor point, am I right to assume that setting
'Mail-Via=DISTRIBUTE' is identical to 'Mail-Via=DIST2' and DIST1 is
no longer an option ?

Thanks,

Juan
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 10:44:43 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Listserv gone haywire
Comments: To: OASIS@TEMPLEVM.BITNET
              13 Apr 1992 00:21:15 EDT from "Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7"
              <LSTSRV-L@SEARN>

On Mon, 13 Apr 1992 00:21:15 EDT Stan Horwitz <OASIS@TEMPLEVM> said:

>Does  anyone have  any idea  what's  going on  here? I  have never  seen
>listserv behave this  way before. Maybe it has something  to do with the
>fact  that this  system was  shut  down for  several hours  today for  a
>hardware upgrade.

Update  SYSTEM NETID  to  reflect  your new  CPUID,  resave CMS,  restart
LISTSERV, and  CP TRANSFER all the  rejected jobs back to  it. I strongly
advise  re-IPLing VM  as I  suspect LISTSERV  isn't the  only application
baffled by the bad CPUID.

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 11:02:27 EDT
From:         "John S. Fisher" <FISHER@RPIECS.BITNET>
Subject:      Need ideas for odd GET vs. AFD behavior

Does anyone know of a clever way to have GET <name> PACKAGE return one set of
files whereas an AFD <name> PACKAGE makes you eligible for a different
(intersecting) set of files?  I realize I can do the equivalent with two
$PACKAGE files and a little user education, but....

The reason I'm interested in this is because I'd like to keep the entire
package as a VMARC-style archive.  New people asking for the package would get
the archive plus some plain-text documentation.  People that have AFD'ed the
package should only get individual updates (which are usually small) that I'd
post separately, not the full VMARC-style archive each time it is updated.


/JSFisher
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: William Rainey Harper College; Palatine, IL  60067
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 09:15:11 CST
From:         Bob Brown <BBROWN@HARPERVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Corrupted LSWCWRT MODULE

On Mon, 6 Apr 1992 16:04:38 +0200 Eric Thomas said:
>You will need
>to install 17B-002o before to fix CARD so it can load the new MODULE file
>successfully.

How do I do this (install 17B-002o)?

-boB

----------------------------------------------------------------------
BBROWN@HARPERVM.BITNET     ####  ####    Bob Brown
Harper Community College   ##  ##  ##    Systems Programmer
Palatine IL USA            ####  ####    "...Boink"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Name: Christopher Mark Conn
Organization: SAS Institute Inc., Austin, Texas
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 09:31:58 CDT
From:         Christopher Mark Conn <sascmc@UNX.SAS.COM>
Subject:      looking for a site for texas list
Comments: To: listserv discussion <lstsrv-l%rutvm1.bitnet@unx.sas.com>,
              listserv owners <lstown-l%indycms.bitnet@unx.sas.com>

I am looking for a site that will be willing to host a listserv
list for runners in Texas, to be called DRSTX (Dead Runners Society
of Texas). This will be a discussion group for runners living in
(or interested in) Texas. The site can be anywhere, doesn't have to
be in Texas.

Please drop me a line if you can offer one.
Thanks!

  ___                          ___
//               ||\  /|     //
||               || \/ |     ||
\\___ hristopher ||    | ark \\___ onn                      sascmc@unx.sas.com
______________________________________________________________________________
Systems Administrator / AIX Host Development
SAS Institute Inc. PO Box 200075 Austin, Texas 78720-0075 (512) 258-5171 X3369
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 11:58:44 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Message
              13 Apr 1992 13:57:15 EDT from "Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7"
              <LSTSRV-L@SEARN>

The message says "probably" because LISTSERV has no way to know for sure.
It sent a  file to RSCS, and  RSCS sent it back -  presumably because the
destination node is unknown, perhaps because the tag had incorrect syntax
or because the moon was in the wrong phase. You should have a look at the
files; if  the VIA list contains  TEMPLEVM, they were indeed  meant to be
sent to wherever it is they are tagged for, so just transfer them to RSCS
and they will  be processed. Otherwise you have to  RECEIVE them and send
them back from a postmaster userid.

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Thu, 16 Apr 1992 20:20:30 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Planned release date for 1.7c

Barring any  major problem, 1.7c  will be released next  wednesday, april
22nd. Note  that I will be  mostly unavailable from  the 5th of may  to a
date as yet undetermined but quite close to the end of the month.

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 16:10:26 -0500
From:         dan@FOGHORN.PASS.WAYNE.EDU
Subject:      Internal Error...

Hi, I've been having the following problem for about a week and a half at
least, possibly longer.  I am including a copy of the commands I send.

tell listserv get listdb memo
Ready; T=0.02/0.04 16:43:29
* Internal error, postmaster has been notified.
PUN FILE 0889 FROM MAILER   COPY 001   NOHOLD
* New mail from Revised List Processor (1.7b) <LISTSERV@WAYNEST1.BITNET>

The file I receive has the following line in it:

FAC "A1" does not appear in "LISTSERV FILELIST".

I have checked the file LISTSERV FILELIST.  There were some lines that
weren't formatted as the lines above and below, so I corrected them (one of
the lines was for the file LISTSERV FILELIST, but LISTDB MEMO was ok).  I
then shutdown LISTSERV and did a cold start.  This didn't help.  Any ideas?

Thanks.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Daniel Cwiertniewicz     	       	       	          	313-577-0787
Planning & Support Services     	       	         Fax  313-577-8787
Computing & Information Technology
Wayne State University
Detroit, MI  48202
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU