HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mazzarel@oreo.berkeley.edu (Ariel Mazzarelli)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle/Bush Competency?
Date: 27 Aug 1992 21:40:15 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Math. Department.
NNTP-Posting-Host: oreo.berkeley.edu

In article <27236@life.ai.mit.edu> benjamin@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu (Benjamin Renaud) writes:
>In article <1992Aug25.114434.2017@wkuvx1.bitnet> barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
>>To all Bush and Quayle bashers--
>>
>>  Though a registered independent myself, I find myself drawn to the
>>defense of our President and Veep.  First off, the free trade agree-
>>ment with Mexico, though much maligned, is a good one.  

These words have been reposted a million times already,  but they are 
SO GOOD...
>
>[A lot of text defending the free-trade treaty thing]
>
>Great!!! Yippee!! Joy! Joy! Joy! one good thing!! social programs? the
>constitution? employment?  THE DEFICIT? poverty? AIDS? sex? all these
>were bushered badly (especially that last one)
      ^^^^^^^^

Was this intentional?  Well,  if not then we have the winner of this
week's Mr. Serendipity.  In fact,  it is downright suggestive.

"How did you do on your test Ariel?"

"I quayled it."

"This guy showed up at my office,  and asked me for the $20 I owed
 him.  I bushered him."

"I quayled my way into the firm,  thanks to my Dad."

"Why did you not pull out Hershisher when he was getting creamed,
 Lasorda?"

"I bushed up."

Ariel
From: CLINDSAY@vma.cc.nd.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle/Bush Competency?
Date: 26 Aug 92 13:50:34 GMT

Fred,
You think the Bushman has some sort of corner on integrity (you remarked
on how he admitted that "no new taxes" which conveniently helped him win
the election, was something he lately admitted as a mistake)?
What about Walter Mondale, who told the truth from the beginning (remember,
he said there probably would have to be some increase in some taxes)?
I think Bush is about the most cynical SOB to come down the pike.  Taxes,
abortion stance, righteous indignation over some countries' pecadilloes
but not others (Kuwait has oil, Bosnia doesn't) and the list goes on.

Cathy
From: Frederick.A.Ringwald@dartmouth.edu (Frederick A. Ringwald)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: I'm dragging out the old T-shirt
Date: 29 Aug 92 22:12:44 GMT
 <MeaXe4i00io=M4wExk@andrew.cmu.edu> 
 <1992Aug27.215423.16446@peponi.wcc.govt.nz>  
 <1992Aug28.174516.2705@qualcomm.com>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0d56@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <1992Aug28.174516.2705@qualcomm.com>
jpinteri@gdansk.qualcomm.com (Jay Pinterics) writes:

> Yes, but Spaceman Spiff is more qualified than our current VP to be 
> chairman of the National Space Adivisory Council.  :-)

So is Elmer Fudd, or just about ANYONE!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
From: dsh@odin.ece.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
Subject: Re: stupid, blood sucking media
Organization: North Carolina State University
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 00:42:20 GMT

In article <saurav.714947184@cory.Berkeley.EDU> 
saurav@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Saurav Chatterjee) writes:

> I just find it funny that they talk about family values when the
> Republican god, Ronald Reagan, had the most anti-family in the world. 
> I think half his children wrote books denouncing Ron & Nancy. 

I don't think Patti's book would have sold well had she given
lavish praise to her parents.  


>Saurav

Doug Holtsinger
From: elambert@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Eber Lambert)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Phil Gramm
Keywords: droning boring
Date: 2 Sep 92 23:56:40 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA

bryan@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov (Bryan L. Allen) writes:

>Kinda like J. Dan Quayl on industrial-strength barbituates.

.... Quayludes?

eel
(caution ->wind)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: ejohnso@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Eric Johnson)
Subject: Re: Quayle gets it wrong again
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 05:54:46 GMT

In <168548F36.DSTEPHEN@cmsa.gmr.com> DSTEPHEN@cmsa.gmr.com writes:

>While I'm at it, I also think (a) sending harassing E-mail to Tucker Quayle is
>just fine (e.g. "How did your sister's abortion go?")

I suggest you get a stopwatch and try the following test:
	1)	Send harrasing E-mail to TDQ. Start timing watch.
	2)	Check interim time for when your account gets pulled.
	3)	Check final time to see how long those Secret Service guys
		show up at your door. (bet they have _fast_ planes)
	4)	Spend the next 5-10 years trying to figure out the correlation.
		You'll probably have plenty of time to do so, between rapt
		conversations with your roomie, Mr. Hinkley.

Seriously, they take this sort of stuff with a very straight face. Besides,
the kid's not responsible for the sins of his father, and there's no need
to fall to the level of the 'Lambs of God' who harrass the children of doctors
who perform D&Cs.
-- 
    Eric Johnson	         |  Commit random acts of kindness and
    ejohnso@ccu.umanitoba.ca 	 |         senseless beauty.
       The Johnsons are taking over.  - William Burroughs
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Dan and Depauw Univ.
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Date: 29 Aug 92 02:42:19 MST
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

Isn't DePauw University a "liberal arts" college?

If so, DQ has in the last 20 years tremendously repudiated his heritage.

Think about it.
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."
From: sab@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: poster boy
Date: 1 Sep 92 08:42:20 -0500

Since nobody has mentioned it, I will.  When Perot visited Orlando
some weeks ago, there was a row of campaign posters.  

The image was the painting _The Scream_ (the one with an elongated 
face, hands in the 'Home Alone' position, mouth wide open, all 
viewed through a wavy, distorted lens) surrounded with the words 
                      PRESIDENT QUAYLE.

I want one!  Anybody out there know a source?

Incidentally on the subject of hurricane response, volunteers from
Gainesville (apprx 6 hours north of south Dade) were rolling before
Andrew was even in mid-Gulf.  Where was FEMA?  The landing slot
used by Air Force One would have been better expended on relief
supplies.  What's is really weird is that Miami is Republican
country - image the response if San Francisco had been hit!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Steve Bloom       | "It's easier to find something that isn't
 Soil Science, U.Fla.|  there...when it's not there in large
SAB@GNV.IFAS.UFL.EDU |  quantities"  L.Slobodkin (Woods Hole, 1969)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Subject: Re: Dan's a Democrat (sorry, wrong key)
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 16:14:39 GMT

In article <unrzc7.2.714996004@daphne.rrze.uni-erlangen.de> unrzc7@daphne.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (THOMAS LUBANSKI) writes:
>
>After watching this newsgroup for quite some time, I do have a really nasty 
>suspicion. Dan can't possibly be a Republican, he has to be some kind of 
>brilliantly planted Democrat spy, helping Clinton/Gore to win this year's 
>election. I mean - if Dannyboy is a complete idiot, nobody would have 
>elected him (or that man who chose him as his VP). You wouldn't have, 
>wouldn't you? 

Many Democrats believed the same sort of thing during the 1980
primary.  They were hoping that Ronnie Reagan would win the
RepubliCon nomination, because the contrast between a slightly
aware Carter and a platitudinous blockhead Reagan was so sharp
to guarantee Carter's re-election.  Mistake!

Repeat:  no matter how loopy the Dandroid appears, and no
matter how much entertainment value he provides for people
whose synapses fire more than once per hour, he is taken
seriously by many Americans and is esteemed by most conservatives.
If the Bushman wins this election, Dan-o will be the automatic
favorite to garner the RepubliCon nomination in 1996, with
Adolph - er, Pat Buchannan being his main challenger.
"Idiot" and "person to be taken seriously" are not 
mutually exclusive.

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
From: dianem@boi.hp.com (Diane Mathews)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Previous post
Date: 1 Sep 92 16:23:43 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara Division

In the previous post I know about the original Quayle statement, and I know
what happened at the Emmy's, but what came next?
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: birdman@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Christopher Kush)
Subject: Re: Quayle gets it wrong again
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 14:38:56 GMT

A quick p.s. - Democrats and Republicans: Same game, different name.

_________
_/__\_._| christopher s. kush / birdman@nwu.edu / (708) 467 2067
_\@_|_._| computer systems / programming, industrial research laboratory
___/____| 1801 maple avenue, evanston, illinois 60201 - 3135
__/_____| mesg y; cat /core | write root &; mesg n
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:3273 alt.politics.bush:3770 alt.politics.clinton:3747
From: sysmatt@aix3090b.uky.edu (Matt Simpson)
Subject: Re: Dan's Kid Conceived Before Marriage?
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 08:02:38 GMT

zaccone@rigel.cs.bucknell.edu (Rick Zaccone) writes:

>An article about Dan in last week's NYT mention that he and Marilyn
>got married after dating just 10 weeks in 1974.  It also mentioned
>that his oldest kid is 18 years old.  I'm wondering if this was a
>shotgun wedding.  Does anyone know?  What are the dates of his wedding
>and his oldest kids birth?

 If the limited info you have is correct, just apply mathematics. Even
 using the most favorable (for Dan and Marilyn) interpretation ...
 You say they dated 10 weeks in 1974 ... give them the benefit of the
doubt, say they started dating 1/1/74. That would put the wedding around
 3/15/74. Conceiving a child on their wedding night, and carrying him
through a full 9-month term would place his birthday around 9/15/74.
This would make him 18 years old or or about 9/15/92, which means if he's
already 18, they fooled around. If they got married any later than March,
he's got even less chance of being legal.

Of course, we could rearrange the original statement, and say they got
married in 1974 after dating 10 weeks, meaning they started dating in late
1973 and married real early in 1974. This would make it a little easier
to have a legitimate 18-year-old, but it's still pushing it. It would be
interesting to get the accurate dates.

>In Marilyn's interview in Newsweek she said that her kids knew better
>than to get pregnant before marriage.  This would cast new light on
>her self-righteous tone.

>Rick
>--
>zaccone@bucknell.edu
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Phil Gramm
Date: 2 Sep 92 15:55:02 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <BPNFqB1w165w@fennec.sccsi.com> popec@fennec.sccsi.com (William C. Barwell) writes:
>Eris Seiferman, (Aug 31), posts the thought that Danny Boy's main 
>opponent in 96 will be Pat "Cultural Warfare" Buchanan. Soory to say this 
>is wrong.  It will be Texas' own Senator Phil Gramm.  For those who don't 
>know Gramm is one of the handful of Congresscritters that were Reagan 
>Robots in 1980.  He was one of the true architecys of Reaganomics, and as 
>dangerous a fool as you will find in the Congress.  Watch this guy.  He 
>is creepy in a special way that only old time Phil Gramm watchers can 
>really appreciate.

I should be upset that you misspelled BOTH of my names, but
since this is alt.fan.DAN-QUAYLE I take it in stride.

Interesting point, though.  Gramm is often exhibited on tv
shows like THIS WEEK and MACNEIL-LEHRER as a conservative
intellectual and economics expert, but an examination of his
statements shows him to be just another party hack more than
willing to suck-up to the Religious Rite (sic).  Being from
Texas he fits in with the RepubliCon southern strategy.
He is a Washington DC insider (what! GHWB always claims that
his gang is composed of outsiders.  silly me) and probably
has accumulated enough poliltical debts to make a run
at the top job.

I had been thinking of other 1996 candidates who are photogenic
conservative barfers (bushers) like Newt Gingrich or the
irrepressible Jack Kemp.  Your warning about Gramm will be kept
in mind.

BTW, if Gramm is nominated, what sort of VP should he choose?
Someone from the North, for regional balance.  Someone younger
than himself.  Someone with a nationally known name.
Someone popular with the party right wing.  Hmmm ...

>----------------
>William C. Barwell [popec@fennec.sccsi.com]  //  Pope Charles

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
From: sham@cs.arizona.edu (Shamim Zvonko Mohamed)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Danny's gray sideburns: fake?
Date: 26 Aug 92 18:31:50 GMT
Organization: U of Arizona, CS Dept, Tucson

In article <57290001@hpscit.sc.hp.com> evan@hpscit.sc.hp.com (Evan Whitney) writ
es:
>Danny's gray sideburns look fake to me. Has anyone else noticed this?
>Is this an attempt to appear more mature and distiguished by dying
>his hair gray?

My uncle (unfortunately a devout republican) met Dane Quayl about a month ago.
Watching the convention with him, the first thing he said: "Wait a minute! The
grey in the sideburns is fake!"

-s
Organization: Information Networking Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 10:25:12 -0400 
From: "Joshua M. Sabloff" <jsa5+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Taxes

Excerpts from netnews.alt.fan.dan-quayle: 25-Aug-92 Re: Taxes by Eric
Sieferman@milton.u. 
> BZZZTT!  Wrong again!  The figures I've seen say that SOME people
> are paying less in FEDERAL taxes while others are paying more,
> but the level of taxes (including local and state income taxes and sales
> taxes) as a percentage of GNP has increased slightly during the Bush era.
> True, one cannot blame the Bushman for this, but let's not give
> him credit for a tax reduction that did not occur.

Umm, the original author noted that millions of middle and lower-class
people were paying lower taxes because they are now unemployed!


-Josh Sabloff (jsa5@andrew.cmu.edu)
"Now go away before I taunt you a second time-a!"
From: bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Audience cards?
Date: 25 Aug 92 23:34:23 GMT
Reply-To: bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)


In a previous article, martha@gvlf7-o.gvl.unisys.com (Martha Sherman) says:

>In article <1992Aug21.143712.18946@engage.pko.dec.com> bender@riscee.pko.dec.com (Patricia Bender) writes:
>
>Yes, there were 'cheerleaders' in the convention hall that told the
>audience what to yell.  As far as I know, they did not use cue cards,
>just their voices to relay the chant.  On one pan of a PBS camera, you
>could see a 'cheerleader' at work during one of the speeches.  I also
>heard the 'cheerleaders' issue discussed on one of the post-convention
>radio shows.  It really isn't that surprising, considering that the
>conventions are just dog & pony shows.  

Yeah, I saw those fine young Arians during the convention coverage.  They
looked like Hitler youth, with their heads thrown back and sputum spewing
out of their mouths as they led the frantic crowd in shrill chanting of
unbelievably clever slogans like "FOUR MORE YEARS" and "WHERE WAS BILL?"
(Where was Bill when?  I dunno.)

Speaking of cheers, I had the pleasure of seeing the Clintons and the Gores
appear in downtown Cleveland last week.  When Hilary was introduced, some
wag began a chant of "NO MORE BUSH," and the crowd gleefully joined in.
I hope Hillary knew that was the punchline of a rather raunchy joke (which
I'm sure has been posted here...)

-- 
Brad Corsello (bsc7@po.cwru.edu) 2L Case Western Reserve Law School
"The Fanaticks have always had a way of affecting to run into Per-
secution, and count vast Merit upon every little Hardship they suffer."
^ J. Swift.  "Factum clarum, jus nebulosum."  Rex v. Haddock.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bsmart@bsmart.TTI.COM (Bob Smart)
Subject: Re: Dan's taste in movies and TV
Reply-To: bsmart@bsmart.TTI.COM (Bob Smart)
Organization: Citicorp+TTI
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 01:36:06 GMT

You raise an interesting point, about the apparent contradiction in
television preferences (Murphy Brown, Simpsons--bad; Ferris
Bueller--good) but it's really quite simple.  Murphy Brown and the
Simpsons are both shows about ordinary, working-class people: people who
have firsthand experience with paychecks, grocery store price scanners,
paying income tax, and so forth.  You know the type.

Ferris Bueller is about the spoiled son of wealth and privilege,
casually ignoring any and all rules that apply to "little people." 
You're supposed to be on the edge of your seat all through the movie,
wondering whether Ferris will get caught by the Authorities...but as any
spoiled son of wealth and privilege knows, it doesn't actually MATTER
whether you get caught or not, because there won't actually be any
consequences anyway.

I'm not surprised that the Danimal approves of Ferris.  He'd BE Ferris,
if he had any style or wit about him; lacking both, it's not surprising
that he contents himself with being a Ferris fan.  Ferris doesn't bother
with boring old school, gets to go and do whatever he wants with his
friends (and somebody else, like daddy, gets to pick up the tab), and
gets to be everybody's little angel as long as he makes even the tiniest
show of keeping up appearances.  Lying to his family, defrauding a local
business, truancy, conspiracy to commit grand theft auto...none of that
matters, as long as you have Family Values.

And, in the true essence of a Republican wet dream, the one person who
really knows what's going on (the snotty sister) can never quite expose
the truth.  So all perfidy remains safely hidden.  And as long as you
don't actually get caught, you didn't do anything wrong.

Nothing contradictory HERE.

---------

A fanatic is someone who does what he knows that God would do if God knew the
facts of the case.

Some mailers apparently munge my address; you might have to use
bsmart@bsmart.tti.com -- or if that fails, fall back to
72027.3210@compuserve.com.  Ain't UNIX grand?
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: dks@athena.mit.edu (dks)
Subject: The Dannikinsey Report is non-fiction.  REALLY!
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 22:11:28 GMT



Friends:


After I posted the Dannikinsey Report a few weeks ago:


        "Show me a man who plays a good game of golf, and
           I'll show you a man who is neglecting something."

                                     -- John Fitzgerald Kennedy


        "Anyone who knows Dan Quayle knows that, given a choice
           between golf and sex, he'll choose golf every time."

                                     -- Mrs. Marilyn Quayle


I received several messages from people urgently seeking to know whether
the second part of the Report is authentic.  Did I make it up, they wanted
to know.  Was it just another liberal lie planted in the name of bad humor,
they wanted to know.  Would I quit making such scurrilous accusations, they
wanted to know.  I am happy to confirm that the answer to all these questions
is a resounding "NO!"  The woman actually said it, and she was completely
sober at the time.  And she *was* talking about her One and Only.


Dhanesh

PS: Folks, if you're going to call me a liar, just use "liar," OK?
    After all, it's got four letters -- what more could you possibly
    want in a word?


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
From: garrett@Ingres.COM (QUOTE OF THE YEAR)
Subject: Re: I...RON...NEE
Summary: 
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Keywords: 
Organization: ASK Computer Systems, Ingres Product Division
Date: 28 Aug 92 01:08:27 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.160950@IASTATE.EDU>, danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A As writes...
>In article <saurav.714947184@cory.Berkeley.EDU>, saurav@cory.Berkeley.EDU
>(Saurav Chatterjee) writes:
>> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:

>   "Twice married Reagan, who's three children have four divorces among them,
>had no comment"
> 
>-Roland Hedly Jr. from Doonesbury (by G. B. Treudeau).
>  
>   Also, if I recall, there is circumstantial evidence that Ron and Nancy had a
>shotgun wedding.  For that matter Reagan was the only U. S. president to lead a
>labor union *shudder*  Guy sure has good conservative, familly values type
>credentials.
> 
This is interesting. I knew Ronald "let's fire all the air-traffic controlers"
Reagan was a member of the actors guild, but I didn't know he was a LEADER
of it. I seem to remember that around 86'-87' he crossed a picket line 
of his OWN union. What an increadible sell-out!

>                            ...I'm gonna HURL...
Mind if I join ya'?

>Dan
>Danwell@IASTATE.EDU

-Garrett
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello)
Subject: Re: family values
Reply-To: bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 21:38:17 GMT


In a previous article, cindy@solan10.solan.unit.no (Cynthia Kandolf) says:

>>>>DEFICIT SCHMEFICIT!
>>>>
>>>(As long as I'm rich)
>>
>>not if the US dollar takes a nose dive.
>
>What do you mean, "if"?

Good observation. I'm suprised no one had mentioned it yet.  The headlines
should read:

BUSH GIVES ACCEPTANCE SPEECH:  STOCK MARKET AND DOLLAR PLUMMET

I know it's very, very complicated, but stock and money market speculators
ARE influenced by political events like the speech.

-- 
Brad Corsello (bsc7@po.cwru.edu) 2L Case Western Reserve Law School
"The Fanaticks have always had a way of affecting to run into Per-
secution, and count vast Merit upon every little Hardship they suffer."
^ J. Swift.  "Factum clarum, jus nebulosum."  Rex v. Haddock.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl)
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1992 21:41:02 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM Rochester

In article <92Sep1.165337edt.115@orasis.vis.toronto.edu>, liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu) writes:
|> not to mention all those Aryan-Nationalist in the Northwest, they
|> will be thrilled to do battle with some no-so-white economical conscripts
|> from the inner city of LA, NYC, and Detroit.  
|> 
|> 

   Don't forget the Green River Killer!!  He should be able to get
quite a few of them!!

Jared Dahl
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Jared Dahl             | "My heart is human, my blood is boiling, | 
| Systems Programmer     |  my brain IBM"                           |
| IBM - Rochester, MN    |              -- STYX,  "Mr. Roboto"      |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Opinions expressed are mine, not IBM's.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: wilson@gauss.cs.jhu.edu (Dwight Wilson)
Subject: Re: Quayleisms and Bushisms (Was: Re: Quayle/Bush Competency?)
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University CS Department
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 21:39:05 GMT

In article <92244.111141APPMS@CUNYVM.BITNET> Alexandre Pechtchanski <APPMS@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:

>Will some kind soul undertake a task of collecting all these quayleisms
>and bushisms and then post a summary?  I'm sure it will be much appreciated
>by all of us (sorry - can't volunteer myself - I accidently deleted most of
>the gems)

No no, what we want is someone to make a collection of digitized film 
clips and sound bites.  We could call it, "The Multimedia Elite."

-Dwight

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle