HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca (ochealth)
Subject: Re: Where are all the screensavers?
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 04:32:51 GMT

In article <1992Aug23.211005.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> hank@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:
>
>Kai Uwe Rommel has a screen saver (scrutl) which works by:
> The possible cards are 8514/A, VGA, EGA and Monochrome. This screen
> saver does not use and Presentation Manager functions to perform
> the screen blanking but rather uses hardware capabilities of the
> display cards to blank the screen. This has the advantage, that no
> screen redraw has to be done when the screen is switched back on.
> In addition, it cannot interfere with running programs (as long as
> they do not change the current screen palette).
>
>Look on ftp-os2.nmsu.edu in pub/os2/all/miscutils (?).
>
>--darrel hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu

This is a good screensaver, especially if you don't like toy screensavers.
this one keeps out of the way, and doesn't hog CPU time like others do.

I'm hoping Kai will update it so I can load it in Config.sys, and it'll
blank the scren for all screens, not just OS/2 PM (OS/2 Fullscreen, DOS,
and Windows ) while he does have a DOS and Windows version, an all in one
version would be way cooler.




-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
jpm: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca         
                            Happily using OS/2 2.0 because MS Windows isNT ___
                                                      Insert VapourFeature ^^^
From: mmtl@hobson.cc.flinders.edu.au (T.Lampre)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: GCC/GPP in c.b.os2 this week.
Date: 26 Aug 92 01:26:58 GMT
Organization: Flinders University

In article <5VqZPB6w164w@dvss.UUCP> dvss!jtroy@udel.edu (Jay Troy) writes:
>
>
>Why waste bandwidth with the new posting of GCC/G++ for OS/2 when the
>EMX version is already working just fine and WITH GDB SUPPORT??!!?!?!
>I can think of any number of other things that I'd like to see passing
>through that group that would be more worth while than yet another
>revision of a great GNU tool that doesn't even improve upon the current
>"latest and greatest" port.  It seems to me that man power efforts are
>wasted if talented people are performing simultaneous ports of the same
>target.

The targets are not the same. EMX targets both DOS and OS/2. GCC/2
targets only the latter. If you look at the sources for EMX you will
see how much work is involved getting it to fit into 8.3 filenames and
other DOS stuff. Those of us working on GCC/2 do not want to carry
that burden.

As much of my career has been spent maintaining others code I have an
attitude of changing as little as possible to get the thing to work,
and to try and get those changes incorporated into the base product.
GCC/2 2.2.2 already has some OS/2 support built into it thanks to
Barry Jaspans efforts at pursuading Richard Stallman. 

>
>I'm all for the spirit of competition, but the bandwidth comsumed by 82
>parts of the new C compiler is really a waste of many resources.  Maybe
>we should create a comp.os.os2.ports where developers can discuss and
>keep track of what others are working on.  Thus saving untold man-hours
>and resources.  Some coordination would benefit all of us.
>

I'm not sure if GCC/2 should have been posted this soon, particularly
as I forgot to include some of the header files. I didn't submit it,
the moderator of c.b.os2 took it upon himself to do so. I just hope he
noticed the missing bits and put them back in.

Trevor Lampre
<mmtl@cc.flinders.edu.au>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: andrzej@bnr.ca (Andrzej Bieszczad)
Subject: Re: Excel 4.0? Word 2.0?
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.,
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 14:43:14 GMT

In article <1992Sep2.213046.25861@csc.ti.com> fritz@ra.csc.ti.com (Fritz Whittington) writes:

   The point is that there is often a steep learning curve to using *any*
   of these programs, and there is also an investment in data-entry time
   that you have made.  Finally, if there are lots of other people using
   things like Excel and WfW, you sometimes need to exchange files with
   them.  (That's mainly why I have WfW myself, even though I don't
   prefer using it.)  

   This means that if we would really like to spend more of our time in
   OS/2, and less time re-booting into Windows or WINOS2, we would like
   to eventually (say at upgrade time) be able to get OS/2 versions of
   those programs.

Oh come on, WfW and Excel are extremely easy to use. It takes time to
discover all features, but you can start working - efficiently - at
once with easy stuff (the same I would say about PowerPoint).  Anybody
who says that those MS products are bad should try them. They are
excellent.

I would gladly use OS/2 for running Windows packages, if OS/2 was not
so buggy (wrt running Windows in SVGA and some other annoying
problems). I invested several hundred of dollars in Windows software
(if OS/2 2.0 was here two years ago, I would buy stuff for OS/2), so I
am not very eager to spend another couple of hundreds on new packages
for OS/2. It will take some time before they are as polished as the
Windows counterparts. However, if the incoming CSD brings a bug free
version (well, almost bug-free, since a completely bug-free software
is yet to be seen), I will buy any new application for OS/2 (like
Borland C++), and perhaps in 1-2 years I will upgrade the rest of the
Windows applications.
--
========================================================================
Andrzej Bieszczad                     | Phone:  (613) 763-2259
Bell-Northern Research, Ltd.          | Fax:    (613) 763-3283
Dept. 9K12, P.O. Box 3511, Station C, | USENET: uunet!bnrgate!eh!andrzej
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4H7      | BitNet: andrzej@BNR.CA
========================================================================

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Specific Version: File/Device IO & EMS problems
Keywords: EMS specific
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 23:38:29 GMT

In article <kurtk.715390556@ee.ualberta.ca> kurtk@ee.ualberta.ca (Kurt Klingbeil) writes:
>Next off, a couple of specific version EMS-related questions...:
>1. Does OS2\MDOS\EMM386.SYS accept (and follow) command-line
>switches?

I don't think so, but all the settings you name are controlled via
program object DOS settings, and that's the way you should be setting
DPMI limits, exclude regions, EMS paragraphs, etc.

The OS/2-supplied EMM386.SYS and HIMEM.SYS are really "stubs" which
hook you into the OS/2 settings.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST is avail. from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/faq.
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | Or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP").
of Chicago, 60637       | Family Values Means a Job
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: dan@ni.umd.edu (Dan Burns)
Subject: EA DATA. SF file size
Organization: University of Maryland College Park
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 19:24:58 GMT


I have a PS/2 Model 80 with a 330 meg hard disk the with over 250 megs of
disk space used (mostly old dos stuff), that I have OS/2 installed on using
a FAT system and dual-boot.  My EA_DATA._SF is over 11 Meg in size right now
(11059200 byte).  Is this normal?  At home I have a 35 meg HPFS system and
140 Meg FAT system (on the same disk), and the file is just over 110K.

Is something wrong here?  I am using kernal revision 6.311 dated 92/05/14.

Thanks for any suggestions.

--Dan

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: oleg@watson.ibm.com (Oleg Vishnepolsky)
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and Netware Requestors
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 15:45:33 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.1 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: oleg@watson.ibm.com (Oleg Vishnepolsky)
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In  <BtpIvB.HJA@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>  smithcr@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
(Rick Smith) writes:
> I have a problem getting TCP/IP and Novell to coexist.
> ...

Please be aware of the comp.os.os2.networking group a similar
question as answered today. All networking questions have a higher
probability of being answered in that newsgroup.

Oleg Vishnepolsky
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: 32bit graphics engine, etc...
Date: 26 Aug 92 19:27:58 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <BtLHIx.J63.2@cs.cmu.edu> jc70@norman.vi.ri.cmu.edu writes:
>I heard from a friend that worked at Boca this summer that the 32bit GRE was  
>sluggish and slower than the 16bit GRE.
>

Isn't it great how rumors get started - "I heard from a friend...".
By the way, did his GRE have all the debugging code in it?
-- 
   |)  David Charlap           "I don't even represent myself
  /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu   sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
 ((|,)
  ~|~  Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
From: lavalite@well.sf.ca.us (Jonathan Scot Gentry)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: RE:  OddeSsy2:  the installation from Hell
Date: 2 Sep 92 15:55:33 GMT
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link

maurit@nrtc.nrtc.northrop.com (Mark Aurit <maurit>) writes:

> System: PS2 mod 70, 8 meg RAM, Optima external SCSI.
>
> . . .[T]he wp* and ea* wont go, no matter how I trick the command line,
> and trying both popdos and the Windows File Manager - they tell me the
> attributes cannot be changed.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas if in the EA's might in fact be the problem,
> how to use llformat, how to change the attributes on files that
> refuse to let this happen, which team will win the AFC title? My
> tastes are catholic.

We've had trouble with EA's as well, cross links, etc.  The only way
I know of to get rid of the "*. sf" files is Norton DiskWipe.

Good luck.

   ( _)      lavalite@well.sf.ca.us
  (_ ( _)    (501) 374-2462  Don't call after 10:00 PM Central.
 (_____)
 //////
//////
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jjs@ubitrex.mb.ca (John Joseph Strybosch)
Subject: Re: HELP: Where OS/2 2.0 CSD?
Organization: Ubitrex Corporation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 21:36:44 GMT

In article <p55jstg@fido.asd.sgi.com> close@lunch.wpd.sgi.com (Diane Barlow Close) writes:
>dvss!jtroy@udel.edu (Jay Troy) writes:
>>This is becomming a FAQ.  The "June CSD" was a misinterpretation of
>>information.
>>When asked for the release date, both of them indicated "in the fall",
>>when proded, they both said "Late August, Early September".  I'm assuming
>that it was originally planned for September but was now probably
>delayed until November (which is what those down under have been
>hearing too).  
>
>While this news disappoints me, I'd rather know they were going to
>release something good and solid _later_ than something buggy sooner.

I expect they are also trying to get _lots_ of drivers out with
the `CSD' (if they call it that).  If so they are also dependant
on people like Tseng Labs getting their stuff done.  Trying to
coordinate the develoment efforts of multiple vendors is at best
challanging.

I have been waiting for some time, and understand the frustration.
Expecting `Summer' ment having to wait until at worst Sept. 21,
now we all have to re-adjust to `fall' (technically maybe late
December).  I agree with _all_ the complaints about this but can
we please keep them from clogging this group.  Our whining will
probably do more to discourage people from reading this group than
getting the CSD's out sooner; the fewer people that read it, the
fewer people to answer our questions.

JJ Strybosch
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry)
Subject: Re: OS/2 Win3.1 support *better* than MS!
Originator: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 04:24:58 GMT

David Charlap (dic5340@hertz.njit.edu) wrote:
> 
> But in this case, "RSN" wasn't a statement by IBM, but one by Mr.
> Withers.  IBM has stated "Fall", which means (to me) any time between
> September and November.  Unofficial rumors out of IBM are saying
> September, but I disbelieve unofficial rumors from any source.

At the PC92 show in Melbourne, the IBMers on the OS/2 stand were quoting
November for Australia based on the fact that IBM USA were quoting
September. I don't know if the 2 months difference is for shipping etc
or if The IBm people here kow USA will be late :-) (Thank God for ftp eh!)

On a realted note, the same people told me that IBM Australia will be doing
a full product replacement when the 3.1, 32 bit etc stuff all arrives. It
will not be an upgrade but a complete replacement.

-- 
Tom J Parry.
Your reality is a figment of my imagination.
From: t36253b@saha.hut.fi (Aali-Petri Alikoski)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Priorities in OS/2 2.0
Date: 30 Aug 92 17:23:50 GMT
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland

How can I change a running program's priority on-the-fly ?
Yes, I have read the manual conserning pstat-command, but I found
nothing helpful.

Any suggestions ??

-----
 Aali-Petri Alikoski
 Student                           | Microcomputer Expert
 Helsinki University of Technology | Neste Oy,Chemicals,Finland
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Re-install, how to erase all EA's?
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 19:17:31 GMT

>Install OS/2 on E:, then, from an OS/2 floppy boot, CHKDSK /F drives D
>and E.

Incidently, I forgot to mention that after installing OS/2 to E:, boot
OS/2 from E:, then, from within OS/2, delete whatever you need to
delete on D:.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST is avail. from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/faq.
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | Or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP").
of Chicago, 60637       | Family Values Means a Job
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 Dead End (Help needed)
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 01:58:10 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.011014.21146@crc.ricoh.com>, wolff@crc.ricoh.com (Gregory J. Wolff) writes:
>   OS/2 with HPFS installed fails to properly deal with floppies (3.5 inch)
>   written by other systems (including the same machine before HPFS install).
> 	A directory listing shows only the first character in each filename
> 	and does not allow access to any of the files (File not Found error,
> 	even when double clicking the icon in the workspace).  Also, files
> 	written by this system appear incorrectly on other systems (eg. only
> 	first character of file name shows up, directory table seems screwed up)

I had something vaguely like this. Unfortunately, it occurred before I bought
my new Trek, and now I've hit my head once too many times and can't quite
remember the specifics.  

It seems that it was due to disks which were either
(i) incorrectly formatted (1.4 as 1.2), or (ii) partially incorrectly formatted
(our Zenith machines have the interesting capability to start formatting a 
720, abort, and produce a disk unusable in a PS/2, even after formatting in
the Zenith to a 720).

My symptoms were slightly different: multiple listings of each file. 



>   After trying everything and making sure that all the documentation says that 
>   HPFS still uses FAT for floppies, I decide to try to boot with the FAT file
>   system instead of HPFS (note: C partition is HPFS, D is FAT).  Naively
>   I remark out the IFS=HPFS line in my config.sys file.  On Reboot OS2   
>   complains that there is no IFS line in my config file and stops the system.
> 	(Apparently it wants "IFS=" followed by nothing for FAT, why????)

Ooops, this is not the way to attempt "dual-boot". You cannot expect the
boot to simply look at drive d: by removing the IFS line. It does not want
"IFS= followed by nothing". It wants a bootable partition.

Boot from your installation disks. At the first opportunity (after starting
the second disk?), press Esc. Go to your hard disk and fix the config.sys.


> 	Attempting to boot from the OS2 installation disks seems to be going
> 	well until an error appears, the file A:\COUNTRY.SYS FILE NOT FOUND 
> 	(or something close).  I know that the file is there, and have 
> 	not had this problem before in booting from installation disks.

Sorry, can't help here. Better check Sipples' FAQ (the location of this file
is in his signature).

--darrel hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
From: Ian.Munro@f341.n632.z3.fidonet.org (Ian Munro)
Sender: acsnet@csource.oz.au
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Os/2's lack of decent svg
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 21:42:00 +1000

GG>card.  Now this card has worked with EVERY VGA APP I've every tried
GG>(including Windows), but not OS/2.  IBM considers this Orchids problem.
GG>I must assume that when IBM states OS/2 is VGA compatible they mean it
GG>works with an IBM made VGA card (period).

C'mon, buddy, who do you imagine established the VGA standard?

GG>IBM considers it Orchid's problem, Orchid doesn't even use that chip any

Ditto

GG>So far I've found DOS far more stable (for example I don't have to
GG>reboot the machine ever time I try to get a full screen DOS session
GG>in DOS <grin>) and far friendlier.

Surely you are just restating the same video problem? ___
 * MR/2 1.1 NR * If this was funny it would be a tagline.

 * Origin: Custom Programming BBS - Node 2 (3:632/341)
From: michael.hagerty@spacebbs.com (Michael Hagerty)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: OS2/DOS Performance Tuner
Date: 1 Sep 92 22:00:00 GMT
Reply-To: michael.hagerty@spacebbs.com (Michael Hagerty)
Distribution: na
Organization: SPACE BBS - Menlo Park, CA - 10 Lines + 4gB - 415-323-4193

I am looking for an OS/2 app to simplify the task of tuning the set-
tings for DOS applications.  I recognize that this message is going
to encourage a number of people to fire off flames telling me to use
only native OS/2 apps.  Please attempt to restrain yourselves.  I
choose to use OS/2 as "a better DESQview than DESQview" and when I
find a native OS/2 app which is as inexpensive, flexible, functional
and uncrippled as its corresponding DOS app, I shall buy it.

For some reason, which I cannot fathom, a number of OS/2 shareware
authors are apparently unaware of the ASP or its policies, producing
egregiously crippled or limited pre-registration versions.  Perhaps
it is that ASP members have not yet begun, as a large group, writing
OS/2 specific applications.

I would like to be able to fire off an OS/2 app with a DOS app as a
parameter to it.  Have the OS/2 app "manage" the DOS app by setting
up a session with virtually all of the settings at full or on.  The
manager app would, upon the DOS app's exit, calculate how much RAM
was required, including the other versions of memory.  It should
also determine whether comm ports were touched, etc., producing a
list (or file) of DOS settings appropriate for the app.

Then I would like an OS/2 app which would allow me to visually see
the priority of a DOS app and allow me to easily set/change it.  I
have tried PROCS, PSTAT and SETPRI, but these are not as focused or
simple to use as what I am looking for.

These two apps would be reasonable pieces of shareware.  I would be
one of the first to register them, assuming that the registration fee
is not outrageous and I can evaluate the program fully before I send
in my registration fee.  Regards, Mikey

---
 . JABBER v1.2 #42 . How come wrong numbers are never busy?
From: jg3s+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jeffrey Michael Gerber)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Drives in VDM
Date: 26 Aug 92 11:27:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.Aeaxgba00iUxA56nJH
Organization: Junior, Social & Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

I have a VDM I used to connect to our system via TCP/IP.  Everything is
fine in the box until I attempt to run a program called LOGIN (based on
a program from IBM).  One of the functions of this program is to create
a virtual drive on the PC for a network "drive."

When I attempt to use this program, it tells me that all drives are in
use.  Changing DOS_LASTDRIVE to something less than Z does not help. 
Using LASTDRIVE in the VDM's CONFIG.SYS does not help.

I am told this is how the program works to find a free drive:  It looks
at LASTDRIVE.  If it's Z or non-existent, it goes back and looks at each
drive letter until it finds one that isn't in use.  You can also specify
a drive.  If I do specify a drive, I'll still get the DRIVE IN USE error.

Is there anyway in a VDM to force it to not allocate those drives?  I am
using FSFILTER.SYS.  Maybe some FSACCESS command?

Thanks, Jeff.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: lemieux@eecg.toronto.edu (Guy Gerard Lemieux)
Subject: Re: Stuck keys in OS/2
Date: 28 Aug 92 21:14:43 GMT

HARPER@VTVM1.CC.VT.EDU (Scott Harper) writes:

>On 28 Aug 92 16:12:09 GMT,
>   baldwin@csservera.scs.usna.navy.mil (J.D. Baldwin) said:
>>Does anyone else have a "stuck" key problem in OS/2?  I've seen this happen
>>in PM, OS/2 full screen, DOS full screen and various apps.  The system
>>suddenly behaves as if one or more of Alt, Shift and/or Ctrl are being held
>>down.  The keyboard is not sticking physically, and I am certainly not
>>holding
>>these keys down at the time.
>>

>I seem to be having the same problem on my Gateway 2000 486/33c.  The Alt
>key occassionally ends up stuck.  I can 'unstick' it by tapping the key,
>but that first suprise Alt command can be rather annoying.

When using PM with OS/2 1.2 and 1.3 with IBM PS/2 hardware, I had
the Ctrl key stick many times.  The only fix would be to tap on the
Ctrl key.  I don't know if this happened on non-PS/2 hardware.  I don't
know if this was a bug in PM or in the software application I was
developing--most likely the former, but possibly a result of the latter.

Guy
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: OS/2 through 1999
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 22:24:20 GMT

In article <1992Sep2.121707.21193@hemlock.cray.com> bgm@cray.com (Bert Moshier) writes:
>>On a different note, one of my soap-opera taping friends showed me 
>>something interesting: OS/2 on the show! Can't remember which soap, but
>>she recognized it right away. At least those daytime TV series know how
>>to pick OSes, right? :-)
>Way to go IBM and OS/2!  Free PR!!!!!!  Times are they a changing!

IBM seems to have done a fair amount of such publicity.  For example,
an IBM PS/2 is in almost every shot of the outside office in "Murphy
Brown."

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST is avail. from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/faq.
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | Or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP").
of Chicago, 60637       | Family Values Means a Job
From: costis@csi.forth.gr (Costis Aivalis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: New BIOS for Mylex motherboard...
Date: 1 Sep 92 11:45:34 GMT

I've seen a Mylex (386DX-25) with Phoenix version 1.10.10 (1989 i think).
The ugly thing here is that the bios is housed in 4 chips.
This machine is having problems booting up the second floppy-disk (N2)
of SCO-UNIX. It runs SCO-XENIX well. 

What is the latest Phoenix BIOS version?



+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------+
| Costis Aivalis              | costis@csi.forth.gr           |(081)229-346 |
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------+
From: JXL103@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Civilization...
Date: 1 Sep 92 22:27:56 GMT
Organization: Penn State University

Has anyone gotten this game to work under OS/2?...I can load a saved game,
but everytime I try to start a new game, I get a "divide by 0" error...
--any help would be appreciated....