From: A-CAD Resource <appeal@igc.apc.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton
Date: 13 Oct 92 00:33 PDT
Subject: BUSH, CIA, KENNEDY ASSASSINATION
Nf-ID: #N:cdp:1588800031:000:2993
Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!appeal    Oct 13 00:33:00 1992


BUSH, C.I.A., AND THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION


We have all heard or read about the Iran-Contra Affair. George Bush, of course, says he had no knowledge of the arms for hostages scheme. Yet a multitude of documents have conclusively shown him to be "in the loop" regarding this incident.

Many of us have read bits of information on the so-called 'October Surprise' and the holding of U.S. hostages in Iran until the Reagan inauguration in 1981. Again, Mr. Bush says he had no knowledge or involvement in such an incident. 

Yet, as telling as the above questions may be as relates the ethics and patriotism of our President, virtues he has no qualms in questioning in Gov. Clinton, we must go even further back in Mr. Bush's sordid and lackluster public service to get at the heart of the matter. Another, even more formidable question must be asked of President Bush. What was his role as a C.I.A. employee in Dallas on November 23, 1963? 

Mr. Bush, has until now admitted only to working for the Central Intelligence Agency in the role of Director, a job offered to him in the early 70's. But a November 29, 1963 memo from F.B.I. Director J. Edgar Hoover names George H. Bush as the C.I.A.'s representative in Dallas the day after the Kennedy Assassination. According to the memo, Mr Bush was briefed on the on-going questioning of Oswald by F.B.I. Agents. The next day Oswald would be shot dead by Ruby.

During the 1988 Presidential Race Bush's Chief of Staff was asked to comment on the Hoover memo and the then Vice President's service in the C.I.A. The campaign's first reaction was to deny Bush employment in the Agency in the early 60's. They said it must be another George H. Bush. Another George Bush was found who had worked for the C.I.A. during that period, and when asked, denied any knowledge of a Dallas briefing. It was later found that this George H. Bush was a low level analyst.

For those interested in further reading on this important topic, I suggest the book, 'Plausible Denial', by Mark Lane.

What makes this tidbit on Bush even more interesting is that while no direct evidence links Mr. Bush to the actual Assassination Plot, the Agency is directly implicated in the Assassaination and evidence has stood up in Court. Mr. E. Howard Hunt, a long-time C.I.A. employee delivered money to the triggermen in a Dallas Hotel the night before the death of President Kennedy. As stated, this was proven in a court of law in the early 1980's, also referenced in the Mark Lane book.

So the question of Bush's involvement in C.I.A. activities in the early 60's is relevant. And it would be interesting to know why he denies being in Dallas the day after the Assassination of John F. Kennedy. 

If you find this compelling, please help and see to it that the question is asked of George Bush. Pass this information on to someone who is in a position to force the question, whether it be the Clinton Campaign, the Media or Congress. The American People have a right to know.


Xref: sparky alt.politics.clinton:9861 alt.politics.bush:8728