From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: BARBIE DOES IT AGAIN!!!!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 15:59:46 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.133929.25919@nynexst.com> clare@nynexst.com (Clare Chu) writes:
>In article <1992Oct7.201935.19210@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>>>
>> Your right. Don't teach your kid to strive to succeed in a competitive
>>world. Just because everyone else wants that nice job doesn't mean it's 
>>right. I gather you people are from misc.kids. Is every post attacked
>>in that news group or what. Hey as far as I'm concerned put a dress on
>>him it won't bother me in the least.
>
>  This is a certifiable sexist statement.  Who says people who wear
>  dresses don't compete for good jobs?   And competing for good jobs
>  doesn't mean fighting and aggression.  A prosocial person like
>  Dylan will have a much better chance of landing a good job than
>  a bully who can't get along with anyone.
 
Beautiful example of creative editing. I would expect no less.
I believe the original post (before its hacking) said a kid shouldn't
fight for his slice of the pie in life just because everyone else did and
that didn't make it right. Make no sense? I agree. Arguing with you 
chamelions is quite the trip. There is a Roseanne show (it's a show for the
common folk, you probably haven't seen it) where she won't let her
husband fight a bully in a bar. She ends up at the bar and watchs this
guy get in her husbands face. Eventually she realizes that he must
fight or lose all self respect. Clare talks about teaching woman to
fight molesters. Yet originally your complaint was Diana was correct
in not letting her son stick up for himself. Which is it Clare?
If your just looking for fight and wanna flip flop around to keep it
going I suggest you try your SO. I haven't the time for your name calling
nor your fence straddeling.
 
>>>  and self-assertive.  Assertive behavior does not allow oneself
>>>  to be picked on, but also doesn't go and pick on someone else.
>> 
>>Where exactly did I tell her to have her kid attack the other kid.
>>Where? I never did. All I implied was she shouldn't get so upset.
>
>  She can get upset if she wants to.  It's her kid (only 20 months
 
Yea if she wants to get upset more power to her and have a happy life.

>  old) who got picked on by a bully twice his age and size.  What'd
>  you want her to do?  Whistle and look the other way?  She stood up
 
 Hear let me put it in caps for those with comprehension problems:
 MY POST REFERRED TO THE FUTURE. SOMETIME SHE WILL HAVE TO SEND HER
SON TO SCHOOL. GET IT CLARE. WHAT IS SO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND.
Actually I know exactly where the diffuculty is.
 
>  for herself but did not resort to violence.  Who are you to tell
>  women that they shouldn't get upset?  
 
Suddenly I'm telling all women if they should get upset or not.
Clare you are a psychotic.   
 
>> 
>>You people [referring to misc.kids] are 100% certifyably insane.
>
 
                ^--- Another example of Clare's school of creative editing.
    You people refer's to Clare, Andy and Diana. Phobics the lot of you.
 
>  Which is why you're still single and we're not.
>
 
Which is why I am the single parent of a 5 and 3 year old. Clare your
not worth the time. Maybe Andy can get a 2 for 1 at the counselors.
 
>> I tell ya what when some kids continously take Dylans lunch money and
>>the school can't do anything about it because it occurs off school grounds
>>and you can't get any cooperation from the parents you just put some
>>tights on old Dylan and tell him to hide under his desk till his
>>Mommy gets there. Have a nice life Dylan.
>
>  My my, getting homophobic too?  What's wrong with wearing tights?
 
You see homophobes in your sleep.
 
>> 
>> That kids gonna need counseling. Thanks for the unsolicited attacking
>>posts you glorious passive hypocrites.
>
>  You're welcome.
 
Well at least you acknowledge your hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is really the lowest
form of life. They have deluded visions of grandeur and no principle's
whatsoever. A waste of flesh actually. Nice editing job Clare it accentuates
your lack of principle's.

 
================================================================================
 Ipsissimus of the Inner Order of Sesquipedalian Fruitcakes - IIOSF XOX Dawn
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================