From: fafat@aludra.usc.edu (Vijay Fafat)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.china,soc.culture.tamil,soc.culture.indian.telugu
Subject: Re: Indo-china issues, Sum lien
Date: 8 Jan 1993 23:12:45 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

Ye Yang writes:
>>	you the details about the '62 war. You still insist on your
>>	fanatic views about hegemonistic invasion of Tibet by China. The
>>	border dispute between India and China is a much deeper issue, which
>>	unfortunately, you do not understand.
>
>Mr. Fatfat, How do you know the story you know is the true one, you see, 
     ^^^^^^
	:) hey, I assure you I don't have the adipose problem  [alas! :( ] :)

>that is the problem, everyone insists that he knows the truth. 
>It's not strange at all that you cannot understand Dim, Indians could not
>understand with each other, that's why their country divided into
>3 countries, and they are still fighting with each other even inside
>these 3 countries, how can we expect you to understand us?

	part of the problem was a lack of common language :-J between
	Dim and me. He absolutely insisted on sticking to Chinese English,
	which, unfortunately, I do not grasp very well.
	You're right about the intra-fightings in India. While that's
	very unfortunate, are you sure China won't break up like Russia
	once the dictatorship is crushed? The breaking of India had a lot to
	do with the devilish [but absolutely brilliant] british policy of 
	"Divide and Rule", stoking the communal feelings to a pitch where
	such a division was the only way out of a large-scale civil war.
	The current problems vis-a-vis trace back to that event and the
	subsequent skullduggery indulged in by the politicos. I don't
	expect you to know that anyway.


>As for any issue related to China, I wish you can respect the laws,
>don't promote a revelution inside the teritory of China, we don't like
>that. 

	You don't like revolution? By jove, the Chinese students must hate you
	for this...

>
>>	O sure. Tell me the Tiannanmen story. And Gulags. And Mao. You
>>	do not understand a word of what Buddha said, just as the Muslims 
>>	don't understand a whit of what Quran is about, hanging on to
>>	the edicts and fatwas by God-damned Mullahs and Hindus get duped
>>	by the shankaracharyas and Godmen.
>
>TAM incident and CR (what the hell is Gulags?) are different from those 
>religious wars, these
>happened in a rapid changing society, when a complex system is facing
>something new, we expect violent comflicts inside the system, it's
>understandable for me.

	hmmm, you don't know Gulags [or ghulags]... are you an American born
	confused Chinese?? [ABCC].
	And what makes you think what India is undergoing now is not a
	strife arising out of conflicts within the system? Though violent,
	it's an expression of the anger which a majority harbours against
	the double standards of the successive govts. to play the piper to
	minority Muslims and giving them undue advantages.

>The differnce is that China is changing, it's moving forward.

	yea, the Chinese efforts to control it's problems are extremely
	laudable, a place where India has failed pathetically. But China
	is'nt going anywhere with Communism.


>>	It does not matter whether one learns Buddhism or Jainism or 
>>	Mustafaism, as long as you don't know how to interpret it from
>>	a broader, catholic perspective, you're not about to have peace 
>>	anywhere. To say that China is peaceful is just as laughable as saying
>>	that the Islamic countries practise selfless brotherhood.
>
>
>Send these words to the religious war in your country.
>Ze Yang

	I would like to do that. Unfortunately, religious prejudices and
	sentiments run much too deep.

	FFT

Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian