HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: maniac@sonny-boy.cs.unlv.edu (Eric J. Schwertfeger)
Subject: Re: More Questions from a Beginner.
Reply-To: maniac@sonny-boy.cs.unlv.edu (Eric J. Schwertfeger)
Organization: UNLV Computer Science and Electrical Engineering
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 92 05:06:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.040324.394@unislc.uucp>, erc@unislc.uucp (Ed Carp) writes:
) : Booting is still a mystery, since I'm still using the disk-based boot and
) : root images.   Is it possible to set up a HD so that you can boot into linux
) : off of the hard disk?  Is it possible to set up a dual-boot HD?
) 
) Yes.  I don't know.
) -- 

Yes you can set up a dual boot system, the way I'm doing it now is with
bootlin.  Yes, I know I'm answering my own question ;-)

One more question.  For some reason, I can't use the 0.98 boot image
(I'm using the 0.97p1 root).  If I try to use it, it would seem that
the file system is trashed, or just not installed properly, because 
when I try to install (using the script), it gives me several 
out-of-room errors on the destination partion.  Anyone else have
this problem?

BTW, linux has been a blast to experiment with, we were laughing even when
we managed to lock up the system (no fault of linux, we knew we couldn't hurt
anything, so did everything).

-- 
Eric J. Schwertfeger, maniac@cs.unlv.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: butler@cs.tulane.edu (Larry Butler)
Subject: Re: I can't get xview to link...
Organization: Computer Science Dept., Tulane Univ., New Orleans, LA
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 21:08:39 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host-[nntpd-22057]: jupiter

In article <1992Sep25.225541.13547@cs.ucla.edu> aviz@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (J.R. "Bob" Dobbs) writes:
>
>
>       Hello there!  I'm having problems getting Xview to link.
>I just got Xwindows working yesterday, and I got the xprog1.1.T.Z file
>as well, so I have the necessary libraries to link it.  However,
>I get a message that tells me"_setjmp not found in text module"
>or something of the sort.  Any ideas?  Thanks a lot.
>
>Also, on another note, I can't get any resolution higher than 640x480.
>This may just be a limitation of my system, but I thought I'd ask.
>My SuperVGA Card is a ProDesigner VGA by Orchid, and it has 512k and
>a Tseng ET3000.
>
>Thanks for any help.
>Please e-mail replies, as I doubt that this is of general interest.
>
Oh yes it is!
From: mnikunen@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Martti Nikunen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: More Questions from a Beginner.
Date: 6 Oct 92 08:19:06 GMT
	<1992Oct6.050626.26641@unlv.edu>
Organization: University of Helsinki

In article <1992Oct6.050626.26641@unlv.edu> maniac@sonny-boy.cs.unlv.edu (Eric J. Schwertfeger) writes:

   One more question.  For some reason, I can't use the 0.98 boot image
   (I'm using the 0.97p1 root).  If I try to use it, it would seem that
   the file system is trashed, or just not installed properly, because 
   when I try to install (using the script), it gives me several 
   out-of-room errors on the destination partion.  Anyone else have
   this problem?

I have had this problem also and it seems to me that in the install
script mount dumps core and does not mount /hdxx, which implies that
everything goes to the root floppy that does not have room enough.

I have another question. I would like to install Linux from the 
bootable rootdisk of H.J. and after that always boot from a floppy
that does not have the rootimage. How can I do that?


--
Martti Nikunen
Department of Mathematics
University of Helsinki
mnikunen@cc.helsinki.fi
From: eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil (Eric Youngdale)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Disk corruption problem (Was: Wierd behavior with 0.98).
Date: 1 Oct 92 19:57:57 GMT
Organization: Naval Research Laboratory


	Thanks for all the cards and letters.  It appears as if a two-disk IDE
setup is clearly stable.  I still have not gotten a response from anyone who
has two scsi disks and a stable system, so if you have one, please post a short
note.  Actually, I have recieved one report from someone who was able to
reproduce the problem with only one disk(!), but there may have been some kind
of disk trouble which was also involved.

-Eric

-- 
Eric Youngdale
eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: mrex@aix01.rz.fht-mannheim.de (Martin Rex)
Subject: Re: 3 bad files (X11v2.0) on tsx-11
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 12:30:10 GMT
Organization: Fachhochschule fuer Technik Mannheim
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

mrex@aix01.rz.fht-mannheim.de (Martin Rex) writes:
: I get errors when trying to uncompress the following files:
: 
: xbin2.0.TZ#1
            ^^^  actually it was xbin2.0.TZ#2 as people might have noticed
: xfonts2.0.TZ#2
: xfonts2.0.TZ#3

Ok, ok, I must admit, these files aren't damaged, they were just
split to fit on floppies for transportation.
Thanks for all the people who responded to this so quickly.

I would have known it when it had an extension like:

xbin2.0.TZab
xfonts2.0.TZab
xfonts2.0.TZac

which is what I would immediately recognize as a splitted archive.

I haven't seen any splitted archives in the available "Linux-ware" before,,
and I actually didn't think about these filenames very long --
it was Friday evening 8:30 pm and I was ready for the weekend,
just wanted to take these files along ... :-)

-Martin

--
 Martin Rex                              |  "Have the courage to take
 Rechenzentrum                           |   your own thoughts seriously,
 Fachhochschule fuer Technik Mannheim    |   for they will shape you."
 E-Mail:  mrex@aix01.rz.fht-mannheim.de  |             -- Albert Einstein
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: moyerg@rigel.cs.pdx.edu (gary a moyer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: esdi disk controller
Summary: any problems...?
Keywords: esdi
Date: 26 Sep 92 05:47:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: pdxgate.6148

I am getting prepared to install Linux on the following machine:
386-16(dx)
16M RAM
300M HD
ESDI controller

My question is this:  Is linux compatible with that particular
HD controller?

Thanks.

-g.m.

==
  Gary Moyer
  moyerg@cs.pdx.edu
From: Nick Phillips <nwp90@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: BYTE asks, is UNIX dead?
Keywords: UNIX
Date: 28 Sep 92 14:18:06 GMT
Organization: The Southampton Net.Cabal :-)
Originator: nwp90@chapman

In <bibhas.717685421@femto.engr.mun.ca> bibhas@pico.engr.mun.ca (Bibhas Bhattacharya) writes:

>This months BYTE screams out asking "Is UNIX dead?". A closer scrutiny
>of the article proved it's just the otherwise. Are these people trying
>to form a public opinion by some kind of a cheap sneaky media proaganda
>or are these people smart as anybody else? Are they completely bought
>out or just being responsible journalists to guide the common people towards
>more productive computing. I can, frankly, never convince myself with the later
>arguments. As always perhaps, money rules.
>Bibhas.

I haven't read the article in question, but I remember about 10 years ago, BYTE
had a similar cover asking "Is this the year of UNIX?". Don't worry about it,
they're just trying to ask provocative questions, and in the process, sell
magazines... who cares what they think, anyway? With systems like Linux & 386BSD
only now beginning to make UNIX-like systems available to the average person
with a PC box at home, at a reasonable price, how can it be dead? Maybe they were
just referring to AT&T's UNIX... now that it has a bit of competition ;-)

Nick.
From: vitroth+@CMU.EDU (David M. Nolan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Busmouse won't work under 0.98
Date: 3 Oct 92 17:49:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.UenYqii00Uh_Q52WBd
Organization: Freshman, MCS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

I just installed 0.98, and it won't detect my microsoft compatible bus
mouse.  I was planning on using Xwindows, but for obvious reasons X
aborts if it can't find a mouse.  
I installed using Hlu's bootable rootdisk, 5.25 size.  I've ftp'd all
the utilities I need. (I hope)  I've also ftp'd the source for 0.98,
unfortunately I don't have a compiler (yes, I'm a bit of a newbie. 
Where can I get one for Linux?) so it does me no good to have the
source.  
Does the bootable rootdisk not include the busmouse detection routines??
 if so how do I fix this...  
 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        "David Nolan"       | Magic is just a manifestation of reality which
|  | ' _|_   _  _  _|_ | _  | we've never encountered before.  Reality is a
|  | |  |  |/  / \  |  |/ \ | relative term.  Relativity is magic, any way
 \/  |  \/ |   \_/  \/ |  | | you look at it. -- vitroth+@cmu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: n217cg@tamuts.tamu.edu (Scott Taylor)
Subject: Re: Okay, another CLISP problem (fatal!)
Followup-To: comp.os.linux
Summary:  the missing function
Keywords: lisp, setjmp
Organization: Texas A&M University
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 03:21:12 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.031337.2535@tamsun.tamu.edu> n217cg@tamuts.tamu.edu (Scott Taylor) writes:
>In article <IemBjGa00YV9M8Vm1R@andrew.cmu.edu> sg2j+@andrew.cmu.edu (Scott R. Grabowski) writes:
>>Hello, again......
>>
>>Well, I followed the instructions that were posted the other day by Ziad
>>             ...stuff deleted...
>>and running for Linux?  FYI, this is version .97pl5, 486/33, 4MB, IDE,
>>VGA.
>>
>
>I ftp'ed the CLISP files from ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de a few 
>weeks ago, followed the installation instructions in the README, and
>now have CLISP running fine on my linux box.  I am running 0.96c pl2
>and gcc 2.2.2; I think that if you are running gcc 2.2.2d you need a
>patch (actually source for a required C function absent from the 
>library) that was posted  here by Bruno Haible (one of the authors)
>a couple weeks ago.
>

Here's what Mr. Haible mailed me last week; this may not have been
posted (I don't remember), so I am posting it in the hopes that it
will help someone out.  I would have included it in my first post,
but I had to go look for the file ;-)

Scott
n217cg@tamuts.tamu.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: linking clisp
Status: RO


Dear CLISP users,

Some of you have had problems when linking lisp.a with the libc
coming with gcc 2.2.2d. In case "setjmp" is missing from that
library, here is the source of setjmp() from some older libc:

============================= setjmp.s =========================
/*
 * setjmp & longjmp for gcc.
 *
 * We need to save all regs except %eax,%ecx,%edx, as these are
 * used by calls.
 *
 * Jump buffer looks like this (same as bruce evans for minix):
 *
 * 00: %ebp
 * 04: %esp
 * 08: %eip
 * 0C: %ebx
 * 10: %esi
 * 14: %edi
 *
 * Total length hex 18 = 24 bytes.
 */

.text
.globl _setjmp,_longjmp
.align	2
_setjmp:
	popl %ecx		# get return address
	movl 0(%esp),%edx	# and jump buffer address
	movl %ebp,0(%edx)
	movl %esp,4(%edx)
	movl %ecx,8(%edx)
	movl %ebx,12(%edx)
	movl %esi,16(%edx)
	movl %edi,20(%edx)
	xorl %eax,%eax		# non-jump return
	jmpl *%ecx

.align	2
_longjmp:
	movl 4(%esp),%edx	# jump buffer address
	movl 8(%esp),%eax	# val
	cmpl $1,%eax		# Value may not be zero (code by bruce?)
	adcb $0,%al		# nice code, somewhat cryptic, no?
	movl 0(%edx),%ebp	# restore %ebp
	movl 4(%edx),%esp
	movl 12(%edx),%ebx
	movl 16(%edx),%esi
	movl 20(%edx),%edi
	jmp 8(%edx)
=========================================================

Assemble it:

        gcc -c setjmp.s

and use setjmp.o for linking:

      gcc lisp.a setjmp.o -L. -lreadline -ltermcap -s -o lisp.run

I hope this solves this problem.

Bruno Haible
haible@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de
----------------------------------------------------------------
From: gbh@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (GBH)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: NEWBIE NEEDS A HELPING HAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 3 Oct 1992 09:56:45 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu



Ok I just installed Linux via the SLS disks and now I need to get X up

I am using a Trident Video card 

since I am not to fimiliar with setting up the Xconfig file 
I got a copy of the one that was posted here a few weeks ago
from some one helping someone else with there X problems involving
trident

I altered it for a Microsoft mouse on ttys1

and I tried it and this is the error I got




    X386 Version 1.2 / X Windows System [linux v1.1]
    (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 5000)


    Fatal server error:
    no screens found

    giving up.
    xinit:  Interrupted system call (errno 4):  unable to connect to X server
    xinit:  No such process (errno 3):  Server error.





OK now this is my Xconfig File






# $XConsortium: Xconfig,v 1.2 91/08/26 14:34:55 gildea Exp $
#
# some nice paths, to avoid conflicts with other X-servers
#
RGBPath		"/usr/lib/X11/rgb"
FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/"

Keyboard
  AutoRepeat 500 5
  ServerNumLock

MouseSystems	"/dev/ttys1"
BaudRate	1200
#
# The graphics drivers
#
vga256
  Clocks	25 
  Virtual	1152 900
  ViewPort      0 0
  Modes	        "640x480"
ModeDB
# clock  horzontal timing      vertical timing
 "640x480"   25     640  672  768  800    480  490  492  525
             28     640  672  768  800    480  490  492  525

 "800x600"   25     800  816  952 1056    600  608  610  633  Interlace
             36     800  832  966  966    600  600  609  631
             39     800  872  968 1104    600  600  606  624
             39     800  864  896 1008    600  600  606  624

 "920x690"   62     920  952 1088 1168    690  688  718  724

 "1024x768i" 25    1024 1064 1224 1264    768  777  785  817   Interlace
	     45    1024 1064 1224 1264    768  777  785  817   Interlace
 "1024x768"  62    1024 1092 1220 1344    768  786  791  810
             62    1024 1096 1272 1328    768  776  778  808
             62    1024 1072 1176 1272    768  778  779  804
             62    1024 1072 1200 1240    768  766  782  786

 "1152x900"  62    1152 1184 1288 1360    900  898  929  939   Interlace







Now my question is WHATS WRONG???????????????

I need to run in 640x480
256 colors no problem

Trident 8900b or c I am not sure which
it's the 1 meg card...

MUCHAS GRACIAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




ADIOS!!!!!!                                            -----------------------
						      |	Da  Hubster!!!        |
                                                      | GBH@MATT.KSU.KSU.EDU  |
                                                       -----------------------
	REMEMBER!!!

		Every sperm is sacred
		Every sperm is great
		If a sperm is wasted
		God gets quite IRATE!!!






Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: mdw@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Matt Welsh)
Subject: MCC Interim or SLS releases for 0.97.pl4 or above?
Organization: Cornell Theory Center
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 17:50:29 GMT

I'm going to reinstall my system from scratch to pick up the 
improvements/changes in 0.97.pl4 thru pl6 as well as the new
GCC 2.2.2d7 + new jump tables. But I'd like to do this by installing
a new MCC interim or SLS release (or possibly some other
full package release). What's the most recent version of these
releases, and are there any releases coming up with the 0.97.p4+/new
GCC stuff? Thanks.

mdw

-- 
Matt Welsh    mdw@tc.cornell.edu        +1 607 253 2737
Systems Programmer, Cornell Theory Center
  "Yow! Up ahead! It's a DONUT HUT!!"
From: Eric.Eskam@f234.n209.z1.fidonet.org (Eric Eskam)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: RE: BYTE asks, is UNIX dead?
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 23:43:12 -0800

>This months BYTE screams out asking "Is UNIX dead?".

> As always perhaps, money rules.

Yes, and unfortunatly, it is Micro$afts money that is talking in this
instance.

Byte lost all my respect with that cover.  They are no different than
any of
the other Zif Davis Rags, and I have canceled my subscriptions for the
few
that I was subscribing to....


 * Origin:  * Persistence of Vision  *  (702) 293-3882  * (1:209/234)
From: dmd2@ra.msstate.edu (David Dumas)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: I need help installing Linux via the SLS?
Date: 30 Sep 92 02:31:47 GMT
Organization: Mississippi State University

I am installing Linux by using the SLS system and have made it through
disk 4.  Before I go on, I would like to set my system up so that it will
boot from the hard drive instead of the floppy.

I have tried doing what the menu system told me to do in the file /etc/readme.
shoelace and my system was hosed (my partition tables got screwed).  Also, I
read in the FAQ that I could just type "make" to install shoelace on the HD,
but I do not have a makefile anywhere.

What do I do now?

My complex environment is:

1M partition for OS/2's Boot Manager
40M partition for Linux
15M partition for DOS 5.0
In extended partition are:
30M partition for OS/2
the remaining 30 odd Meg is a data disk.


Thanks

David Dumas
dmd2@ra.msstate.edu


-- 
David Dumas
dmd2@Isis.MsState.Edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: alawrenc@sobeco.com (a.lawrence)
Subject: Re: software dependancies for X2.0, gcc 2.2.2d, jumptable 4.1
Reply-To: alawrenc@sobeco.com
Organization: Lawrence & Assc.
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 23:32:49 GMT

In <Sep.27.18.14.15.1992.27994@athos.rutgers.edu> hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick) writes:

>Axel_Riemer@wharfrat.fido.de (Axel Riemer) writes:

>>Hi!

>>I've put X2.0 on my system, got the followings files:

>>xinit: can't load library '/lib/libc.so.4'
>>No such library.

>X2.0 requires the libraries that come with GCC 2.2.2d (called
                                                ^^^^^^^
>jumptable 4.1).  Installing those libraries would give you your

I hate to be picky but that should be 2.2.2d7 .  I have got 2.2.2d
from  the mcc-interim release but it does NOT have the 4.1 shared
libs.

-- 
If any given program runs correctly, it is obsolete.
=========================================================================
Andrew Lawrence, Informaticien Conseil           |  alawrenc@sobeco.com
3605 St-Urbain, #1605                            |  uunet!sobeco!alawrenc
From: zmbenhal@netcom.com (Zeyd M. Ben-Halim)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: ingres: syserr
Date: 30 Sep 92 23:14:59 GMT
Article-I.D.: netcom.1992Sep30.231459.20262
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <7578@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> tdunbar@vttcf.cc.vt.edu (Thomas Dunbar) writes:
>
> i compiled and installed ingres. then (logged in as ingres) when i
>    demodb tst
> it says:   please wait  
>   then dies with
>
> SYSERR      lock write fail
> 
>looking in ./data/base/tst i find some files have been installed.
>   thomas

You have to specify demodb tst -c
This specifies no concurrency control. The default should be NOCONCUR but for
some reason this is not true. If anybody can trace it I'd be grateful.
This problem will bite you again when you try the tutorial since ther is no way
of turning the CONCUR off when using ingres tst.

I'm in the process of changing the lock driver to use AF_UNIX sockets.
Hang in there,

Zeyd
Organisation: European Space Operation Centre (E.S.O.C)
Date: Wednesday, 30 Sep 1992 19:27:48 CET
From: BARRY TITMARSH <BTITMARS@ESOC.BITNET>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Help BUS mouse (was Re: X11 trident Xconfig)

Can any one give me an example of the Xconfig with the BUS mouse
working .. i have tried to use the Microsoft Bus mouse, Linux detects it
ok, but when i run X the mouse is not seen thus hangup.. If i then use
the Microsoft serial mouse on /dev/ttys2 then all is ok..
any idears ??
barry..
From: klaus@aladin.tynet.sub.org (Klaus Herrmann)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Problems compiling smail-3.1.25
Distribution: world
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 23:03:15 GMT
Organization: 
Reply-To: klaus@aladin.tynet.sub.org

Hi linuxers,
i'm now "playing" since a few weeks with linux using now 0.97pl6 and GCC
2.2.2d with jump-tables 4.1. So far I had no major problems compiling the
kernel, elm and some other packages. My plans of using Linus ist to replace
my MSDOS based News/Mailing system with a (hopefully) better Linux based system.

But now I ran into a problem compiling smail 3.1-25:

All the configuration process worked quit fine. The problem I have is the
following:

When GCC tries to complile action.c make stops with:

     xrealloc
     void valus not ignored as it ought to be.

Perhaps this is simple to fix for experts; but I'm not :-).
Can anyone help?
Thanks
      KLAUS



--
    Klaus Herrmann                   |  klaus@aladin.tynet.sub.org  or
    7302-Ostfildern 1 / Germany      |  klaush@tyrell.tynet.sub.org
    ******************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: rafal@utstat.uucp (Rafal Kustra (summer student))
Subject: Re: Writing Linux disks on Sun
Keywords: sun
Organization: University of Toronto, Dept. of Statistics
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 01:29:26 GMT

In article <ucosmo.718399359@mcl> ucosmo@mcl.ucsb.edu (Boris Burtin) writes:
>I was just curious if someone had a solution to this problem.  It seems that
>you can only write DOS disks on a Sun Sparc if you are root and can mount a
>DOS floppy.  Does someone have an alternate solution?  Linux can't read a
>disk tarred on a Sun, can it?
>
>--
>     - Boris
>(cosmo@cs.ucsb.edu)

Yes, it can. At least that is the way I have been gettin
almost all my files: ftp'ed them to Sun then tar them on
floppy, untar them on PC. You should have no problems.
Our floppy drive is 3.5 inch, and has /dev/fd0 device
name.

				Rafal


-- 
/|| " Numbers exist only in our minds. There is no physical entity that
 ||  that _is_ number 1. If there were, 1 would be in a place of honor 
 ||  in some great museum of science, and past it would file a 
==== steady stream of mathematicians gazing at 1 in wonder and awe. "
From: ketil@linerle.ii.uib.no (Ketil M. Malde)
Subject: Re: Great marketing (Was Re: BYTE asks, is UNIX dead?)
Followup-To: comp.os.linux
Reply-To: ketil@ii.uib.no
Organization: student of computer science at the University of Bergen, Norway
	<3747@eastman.UUCP>
Date: 30 Sep 92 15:44:05

In article <3747@eastman.UUCP> talley@ashleigh.Kodak.COM (Brian K. Talley) writes:


   [345]86 platforms will die out?  No, I disagree.  DOS, maybe, but not the
   hardware.

Oh, they will.  Or should...the chips are archaic, I'd swap them for
almost anything with a clean design any day.  But they'll probably
hang around for a few years yet...not to mention that there's a lot of
them around, that won't just disappear over night.

BTW, isn't the p5 going to be RISC with x86 emulation?  Rumors have it
so, I think.

   If Microsoft and DEC work together to port an operating system
   (that's reputed in some circles to be not much better than MS-DOS),
   fine.  For all their work, they're still far behind: look at Unix.
   It's been running on everything from Crays to 286 boxes (and
   below?) for a while now.

I don't think I'd run UNIX on a 286 (hell, I wouldn't run *anything*
on a 286.. :-) (no flames please, I know a small macine is right sometimes

   As I said before, all Microsoft *really* has is the marketing team from hell

The worst thing is, they don't really need marketing at all.  Bill
Gates only have to cough a little and have an occasional dream, and
the whole computer press as well as the bean counters get that silly
smile on their faces...


--
 = Ketil Malde                     In real life:  ketil@ii.uib.no =
 = Nuke the whales!                    Honk if you love unicorns! =
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux