HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: labiche@crchh561.BNR.CA (Maurice LaBiche)
Subject: Re: Marijuana for Paper
Reply-To: labiche@crchh561.BNR.CA (Maurice LaBiche)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 12:34:59 GMT

Yes, all you have said is true.  The repression of this plant also
has several other factors which aid in keeping it illegal.  

After Alcohol prohibition MJ was made/kept(not sure) illegal to
give the US alcohol prohibition Agents something else to storm 
around and seize.  Another reason was to discriminate against
Mexican workers who smoked MJ.  This is an indication of how much
this country is run by people blowing smoke(no pun intended) and
waving arms to distract and misinform people so they can continue
to make their $MEGA (megabucks).  In fact it seems about the only
sane place in the world dealing with MJ is in Holland.  Hmmmmm,
maybe it's not to late to get a ticket for Amsterdam today?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maurice LaBiche (Mo.L.)         |   labiche@bnr.ca
Bell Northern Research          |   Part of Northern Telecom 
Richardson, Texas               |   i'm really in Texas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No opinions herein expressed have anything to do with the opinions 
of Bell Northern Research or Northern Telecom or CIA or NSA ...
These statements are mine and mine alone, well i guess my wife 
agrees with some of them?
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: butts#@shocker.ee.twsu.edu (Ronald W. Butts -SUPER ACCT)
Subject: Re: [anonymous] Drug Testing -- NEED REFERENCES!
Organization: Electrical Engr. Dept, Wichita State Univ.
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 02:50:35 GMT
X-Posted-From: gegan1.ee.twsu.edu
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <185u8tINNiiu@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bx461@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Leo J. Mauler) writes:
From: bx461@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Leo J. Mauler)
Subject: Re: [anonymous] Drug Testing -- NEED REFERENCES!
Date: 3 Sep 1992 20:58:05 GMT


>In an effort to improve attendance, my boss just handed me a
>new directive he intends to implement WRT mandatory drug
>testing, including measures requiring employees to pay the
>expense of positive drug tests (both chemical and spectral
>analysis) out of their own final paychecks.
>
>I say drug testing as a means to improve attendance is
>insanity, he doesn't see it that way.  He sees the threat of
>drug testing as his weapon of last resort, I see it as a
>useless (and expensive) morale-killer, contrary to our goals.

Damned Right! There are more enlightened and less costly ($ and human) ways
to get people to show up to work.

People with little background in statistics are often fooled by the claims
of, say 95% accuracy in drug testing. They think that this means 95% of
the people who test positive are drug users. Not true!

What it means is that 5% non-users will test +ive, 5% of users will test
-ive -- no more. It DOES NOT IMPLY that 95% of the people who test +ive
are drug users. I'll spare the statistical lingo.

An example:
Suppose a company of 1000 workers is to implement drug testing. Lets say
that the test is 95% accurate, specifically that it gives a 5% false
positive as well as a 5% false negative error rate. By some accounts this
may be accurate, by others it may be too optimistic...

Now lets say that out of your 1000 workers, it is know (statistically) that
15% of them are really drug users.

Number of drug users in company: 1000* 15 = 150.
Number of non users in company : 1000-150 = 850.
Number of users who test +ive:  150*.95 =  142.5
Number of non users test +ive:  850*.05 =   42.5
Total users who test +ive:                 185.0
PERCENT OF +IVE TESTS IN NON USERS:         23% !  (NOT 5%)

Anyway, suppose the testing is implemented and many drug users (and many
non users as well) get fired. Next year, maybe the drug use rate is 7.5% in
your company. Good. The same calcalations show that the innocent people
now make up 39% of the total positive tests.

Tell your boss the same thing you tell a drug abuser: try psychology instead
of chemistry to solve his problems. Paint the office brighter, give workers
birthday off with pay, install better lighting (esp. sunlight)... so on.
Nutritious carrots, not painful whips. If nothing else, the cost will be
much less in human terms.


Bill Butts
butts@shocker.ee.twsu.edu
From: jdw@sniff.wfo.dec.com (Joe Whittemore)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: REWARD: Turn in your neighbor !
Date: 4 Sep 92 12:22:13 GMT
Reply-To: jdw@sniff.wfo.dec.com.UUCP (Joe Whittemore)
Organization: LES Engineering in Westfield, Ma.

In article <bigstar.715374929@milton> bigstar@milton.u.washington.edu (Paschel) writes:
>
>This morning, as I was sitting down to my morning cup of juice, I happened
>upon an ad in the Seattle PI.  In the back of the local section (9/1/92),
>is an ad offering a reward of up to $5,000 for info leading to the seizure
>of growing marijuana plants.  The ad prompts one to look for the following
>telltale signs:
                                          .
					  .
					  .
>
>		1-800-388-GROW  (that's 4769 for us idiots)
>		1-800-388-4769
>
                                          .
					  .
					  .

Is tihs "for real"? I just dialed in the number and got something like
"State Patrol Emergency"..... I hung up    =0
From: sean.cloherty@betabbs.newton.ma.us (Sean Cloherty)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: RE: SATANIC CRIME UNITS??
Date: 26 Aug 92 22:55:00 GMT
Reply-To: sean.cloherty@betabbs.newton.ma.us (Sean Cloherty)
Organization: The Beta BBS -=- Newton MA -=- (617)244-7053

Who the hell is Satan, if you'll pardon the pun.
                                                                               
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,talk.politics.drugs
From: tjj@thumper..bellcore.com (J Tim Jordan)
Subject: Re: The Clinton Challenge -- ISSUED!!
Reply-To: tjj@thumper.UUCP (J Tim Jordan)
Organization: Bellcore MRE
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 92 19:43:16 GMT

>Received: from iha.compuserve.com by moose.cs.indiana.edu
>	(5.65c/9.4jsm) id AA24331; Tue, 1 Sep 1992 15:32:44 -0500
>Received: by iha.compuserve.com (5.65/5.910516)
>	id AA08624; Tue, 1 Sep 92 16:32:42 -0400
>Date: 01 Sep 92 16:27:12 EDT
>From: Clinton for President <75300.3115@CompuServe.COM>
>To: "\"Paul Hager\"" <hagerp@moose.cs.indiana.edu>
>Subject: Re: Clinton/Gore drug war program
>Message-Id: <920901202712_75300.3115_CHE104-7@CompuServe.COM>
>Status: RO
>
>Paul,
>
>You should call 1-800-FOR-BILL and make your views known.
>
>Otherwise, look for a new position paper or some subtle change in
                                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>speeches.  I would not expect a direct personal answer.
 ^^^^^^^^

 I did hear Gov. Clinton use the phrase "To fight a more effective war on
 crime". Maybe, by this, he means that he wants to expand the scope of this
 internal war to a war on crime in general. But it still doesn't say
 anything on whether certain, recreational drug using citizens should be 
 given legitimate status or not.

Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer)
Subject: Re: New designer drug
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 13:17:04 GMT

Mecathinone is simply the oxidation product of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine
(that is, the ketone rather than the alcohol), so I'd imagine it would be
quite easy to make.  Its unmethylated relative, cathinone, is found in the
drug khat.


-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,alt.politics.marrou
From: gaspar@inf.ethz.ch (gaspo)
Subject: Re: Crime and drug legalization
Organization: Twilight-Zone-Algorithms-Incorporated
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 07:43:43 GMT

In article <1992Sep01.033111.16788@Veritas.COM> oleg@veritas.com (Oleg Kiselev) writes:
>fisherm@infonode.ingr.com (Matthew Fisher) writes:
>>As an example, an under educated, poor, hopeless drug dealer or user from
>>south central L. A. is not suddenly going take up compter science because drug
>>are legal. He will instead find a new black market to make money in. 
>
>Like what sort of a new black market?  What other market of easily 
>manufactured, high profit margin, high demand, easily transportable,
>high value to weight ratio illegal products can your friend think of?  

silicon chips? and then you have the "ice" and "crack" levels with GAs
chips, the "paraphenalia" of diskettes, the "encouraging documentation"
such as the whie book, the "middle man" who sells you source tapes in a
dark alley, "hard-shops" where you can snag some 10baseT transceivers
from the service entrance 'round back...........

--gaspo.


- Scott "gaspo" Gasparian / Dept. Informatik -    |    - Umwelt    -
- Stabstelle Software / System Administrator -  \ | /  -  Schutzen,-
- ETH-Zentrum,  CH-8092 Zurich,  Switzerland -  _\|/_  - Rad       -
- gaspar@inf.ethz.ch     /   +41'01'254'7205 -   '|`   -  Benutzen.-
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: cavasin@convex.com (Vince Cavasin)
Subject: Re: Nitrous
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 01:06:16 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

9106027l@levels.unisa.edu.au writes:

>Does anyone know of any side effectrs from taking Nitrous???

yeah, oxygen deprivation (aka "the fish") is a nasty side effect if you don't
breath a little air while sucking.

falling down and bumping your head is also a possible side effect if you do it
standing up.

Just use your head.  don't forget about the little things like gravity and
breathing and you should be okay.

-vince
From: scotc.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: LSD and some relatives.
Date: 25 Aug 92 17:21:10 GMT
Organization: Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton

st1el@rosie.uh.edu (Jensen, Douglas J.) writes:

> Just a curious inquery...
> 
> Tried "shrooms" for the first time a week ago.  They were nice, but they lack
> two important things that LSD has...  
> 
> 1]  "Loss of Ego Boundaries"
> 2]  Super-duper-zowie insight.
> 
> If these were the two MAIN effects I was after from tripping, am I best to st
> with LSD?
> 
> [hypothetically, of course.  [snicker]]
> 
> Thanx,
> 
> ---Doug
> 

Ego loss and super-duper wowie insights (or quasi-mystic insights into 
death, which I like to refer to them both combined as) are of course
possible with both (so i'm told, ahem)  I have a friend that once
lost all shape and form on mushroom and started giving stuff away
saying, "take this, i never want to see it again."  but then again
he ate about 4 1/2 grams!

SAC
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: gaspar@inf.ethz.ch (gaspo)
Subject: Cocaine hardens the arteries?
Organization: Twilight-Zone-Algorithms-Incorporated
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 09:50:28 GMT


ok, no perms, no copychecks, but:

        LOS ANGELES (UPI) -- Drummer Jeff Porcaro of the Grammy-winning pop
group Toto died of hardening of the arteries due to prolonged cocaine
use, not of pesticide poisoning as previously suspected.
[..]
        But the coroner's toxicological report completed this week shows
Porcaro died of heart disease caused by long-time cocaine use, Coroner's
Office spokesman Bob Dambacher said.
        The autopsy found traces of cocaine in Porcaro's blood along with
benzoylecgonine, described as a metabolite or byproduct of cocaine.
        ``Cause of death has been determined to be occlusive coronary artery
disease, due to atherosclerosis, due to the effects of cocaine,'' the
coroner's report stated.
[..]

I'd be tempted to believe something more along the lines of "the
increased heart rate that is caused by cocaine use ... over a period of
many years... can lead to atherosclerosis".  

Isn't this the same thing you get from eating too many Twinkies ?

"hardening of the arteries" ?  I bet they also dug gobs of junk food out
of his gut too, but that doesn't make as sensational a headline.

--gaspo.


- Scott "gaspo" Gasparian / Dept. Informatik -    |    - Umwelt    -
- Stabstelle Software / System Administrator -  \ | /  -  Schutzen,-
- ETH-Zentrum,  CH-8092 Zurich,  Switzerland -  _\|/_  - Rad       -
- gaspar@inf.ethz.ch     /   +41'01'254'7205 -   '|`   -  Benutzen.-
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: gaspar@inf.ethz.ch (gaspo)
Subject: Re: LSD freezerburn?
Organization: Twilight-Zone-Algorithms-Incorporated
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 07:38:33 GMT

In article <YeaZPb200UhB02LAxc@andrew.cmu.edu> "Alan S. Ferrency" <af1x+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>Hi.  I've read (in the faq) that LSD lasts longest when stored in a
>freezer.  How long does it last before going bad?  I know it does NOT

sorry, but I've never been able to keep it in the freezer more than a
couple weeks, and it was still kickin.

>Does it taste bad after it's been in the freezer too long?  I know what
>happens to ice cubes that have been in there for only a week or so...

yeah, it does get this nasty taste like you just licked some aluminium
shavings or took a bite out of a coin :-)

--gaspo.


- Scott "gaspo" Gasparian / Dept. Informatik -    |    - Umwelt    -
- Stabstelle Software / System Administrator -  \ | /  -  Schutzen,-
- ETH-Zentrum,  CH-8092 Zurich,  Switzerland -  _\|/_  - Rad       -
- gaspar@inf.ethz.ch     /   +41'01'254'7205 -   '|`   -  Benutzen.-


Newsgroups: alt.drugs,alt.politics.marrou
From: st1g9@rosie.uh.edu (Lee Preimesberger)
Subject: Re: Crime and drug legalization
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 01:47:00 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.193833.17396@infonode.ingr.com>, fisherm@infonode.ingr.com (Matthew Fisher) writes...
# [...]
#    He claims that crime will not decrease but will simply shift
#in focus.  Crime would shift from drugs to gambling, prostitution or some
#new field.  He claims that the people who are in the drug trade are criminals
#to the bone and will seek a new field if the drug trade become unprofitable. 
# [...]
#    This is an interesting arguement.  I was unable to refute this arguement.
#What is the Libertarian answer to long term crime in the inner cities?

	Prostitution and gambling statues will probably fall before the anti-
drug laws are totally eradicated.  You might want to tell your friend that
all blackmarkets will be wiped out in Libertopia - career switching won't
be much of an option.  

	Of course, there's always politicking to keep the criminal element
busy... :-)

			  Lee Preimesberger
st1g9@jetson.uh.edu ----- Undergraduate Scum ----- University of Houston, USA
         All models over 18.  Copyright (C) 1992 LP Productions.
From: cd741@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Paul Andarti)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: Crime and drug legalization
Date: 2 Sep 1992 14:22:05 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: cd741@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Paul Andarti)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, fisherm@infonode.ingr.com (Matthew Fisher) says:

>Hello all,
>
>
>    I have a question for the Libertarians.  To start off, I am a member of
>the party and believe in most Libertarian ideals.  I was reading the party
>News this month and came across "In the Aftermath of the LA Riots."  It
>is argued that the War on Drugs contributed greatly to the riots.  Further
>more the WOD should be halted and drugs made legal.
>    I was discussing the ideas in the article with a buddy.  He is totally
>against drug legalization.  I, of course, was arguing for legalization.
>I gave the usual arguements about a decrease in crime, comparison to alchol,
>coherent policy in goverment, etc.  We got off on the decrease in crime 
>arguement.  
>    He claims that crime will not decrease but will simply shift
>in focus.  Crime would shift from drugs to gambling, prostitution or some
>new field.  He claims that the people who are in the drug trade are criminals
>to the bone and will seek a new field if the drug trade become unprofitable. 
>As an example, an under educated, poor, hopeless drug dealer or user from
>south central L. A. is not suddenly going take up compter science because drugs 
>are legal. He will instead find a new black market to make money in. 
>    This is an interesting arguement.  I was unable to refute this arguement.
>What is the Libertarian answer to long term crime in the inner cities?

Your friend forgets that the claim is that crime has risen in the
inner cites becuase of drugs and specifically crack (this is
the conventional wisdom, not my necessarily my opinion).  So what 
were all of these criminals doing before crack? (probably
computer science :)

P.
-- 
"We're desperate, Get used to it,
  It's kiss or kill" - X
From: 901371d@dragon.acadiau.ca (Di Dio)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: The best hash I've ever
Date: 1 Sep 92 17:39:01 GMT
Organization: Acadia University


 Well its good to be back in the group again.I was home this
summer,and it was pretty dry,except for this wicked fucking
hash.
 I'm telling you,I had four tokes in the morning,thats every
morning,before I went to the beach with some friends.I was stoned
for two hours.
 Isn't that incredible,and things just got better guys.Near the end
of my vacation,there was a softer hash around in the next town,and it
was just like popping the candy(lsd).
 My friends and I went out to a cabin and I had about 25 to 30 tokes,
well I couldn't walk very well so my girlfriend drove.This was the first
time I had ever had hallucinations of any sort.We starting fucking around
at the beach and when we where almost done I thought I felt a
rip,I jumped off her and looked south,and well,I got really fucking sick!.
 I put the old boy back in the pants and asked her if she could drive me
to a friends house.I went to a really good friend of mines place and told him,
he was smoking the same stuff early with me,and he said if was just
like acid too,not just because of the hallucinations but because of the 
strange peice of mind you get in when on lsd.
 Maybe someone dropped some liquid acid on the hash,I'm not sure if you
can inhail it,but I really suspect that you can take that wonder drug
anyway you please!  
 Well the next day I was happy to see that Everything was cool.I could
get deeper into details but I think I'll save some dignity.    
 The reason I'm posting this is to see if anyone has ever had experences
similar.
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,talk.politics.drugs,alt.society.civil-liberty
From: honig@aster.ics.uci.edu (David A. Honig)
Subject: Re: LSD freezerburn?
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Reply-To: honig@ics.uci.edu (David A. Honig)
Organization: UC Disneyland, in the Kingdom of Bren
Date: 26 Aug 92 18:22:23 GMT

 "Alan S. Ferrency" <af1x+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>Hi.  I've read (in the faq) that LSD lasts longest when stored in a
>freezer.  How long does it last before going bad?  I know it does NOT
>turn into S  (as in, I don't live in the S universe), but does it just
>become inactive after a while? Any anecdotal information?  (we're
>talking on the scale of months to years...)
>Does it taste bad after it's been in the freezer too long?  I know what
>happens to ice cubes that have been in there for only a week or so...
>(just kidding :)
>
>-me

Chemical reactions go exponentially on temperature.  Chilling organic chems
slows their decomposition.  L is good for years if kept from moisture, heat,
and light.




--
David "Dances with Motion Sensors" Honig

"Analog farmers don't panic when their silos overflow."
	-Me, after crashing too many workstations...
Xref: sparky alt.drugs:15261 alt.politics.marrou:992
From: rjl+@pitt.edu (Richard J. Loether)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,alt.politics.marrou
Subject: Re: Crime and drug legalization
Date: 2 Sep 92 16:17:02 GMT
Followup-To: alt.drugs,alt.politics.marrou
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Aug31.193833.17396@infonode.ingr.com> fisherm@infonode.ingr.com (Matthew Fisher) writes:
>Hello all,
>
Hi,

>    I have a question for the Libertarians.  To start off, I am a member of
>the party and believe in most Libertarian ideals.  
>
Good.  Keep spreading the word.

>    He claims that crime will not decrease but will simply shift
>in focus.  Crime would shift from drugs to gambling, prostitution or some
>new field.  

As you've no doubt already read, those things would also be legal in 
Libertaria, but that isn't the question, is it?

>          He claims that the people who are in the drug trade are criminals
>to the bone and will seek a new field if the drug trade become unprofitable. 
>As an example, an under educated, poor, hopeless drug dealer or user from
>south central L. A. is not suddenly going take up compter science because drugs
>are legal. He will instead find a new black market to make money in. 

In some (many) cases, he's absolutely right.  The criminals who are now big
time enforcers, hitmen, burglars, etc. will likely be so hooked on the profits
and excitement (romance?) of their current lives that they'll find some other
criminal enterprise.  (  Maybe they can become LA Cops.  :-(  )  They would
then be arrested and jailed one at a time for those violent criminal acts.
Without nonviolent druggies in jail, there would then be room to keep them
for awhile.  

The area where we may expect to see some real progress is that with drugs
legalized, there would be many fewer young replacements moving up to take 
their places.  Of course, the people who are now nonviolent 'drug criminals'
would, by definition, no longer be a problem.

>    This is an interesting arguement.  I was unable to refute this arguement.
>What is the Libertarian answer to long term crime in the inner cities?
>
Long term, we would remove laws against all consentual, non fraudulent,
behavior.
>
>take it easy,

RJL

-- 
Rich Loether (rjl@unix.cis.pitt.edu)
Computing and Info Services (Systems & Networks)
(412) 624-6429 / FAX (412) 624-6436
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: nuke@reed.edu (Bill Newcomb)
Subject: Re: Yohimbe (MAOI, alpha2 andrenergic antagonist or ??)
Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 20:42:25 GMT

In article <1992Aug21.205527.23650@spdcc.com> dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) writes:
>
>That's noradrenergic.
>
>First, saying something is an alpha-2 adrenergic antagonist or an
>alpha-2 adrenergic antagonist is equivalent.  Both carry
>the exact same information, and neither is incorrect.  Cedarquist would

I doubt you'll get any arguments on this one, Steve. 
(read it carefully;-)

Bill (yes, another damn bill on a.d)

--
~/.oo
From: amex@nsq.uucp (Toronto)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Ugly People on LSD
Date: 27 Aug 92 13:34:23 GMT
Reply-To: amex@nsq.uucp (Toronto)
Organization: NSQ


Xref: sparky alt.drugs:15048 soc.culture.usa:6887 talk.politics.drugs:5971
From: mikeq@aspen.CNA.TEK.COM (Mike Quigley)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,soc.culture.usa,talk.politics.drugs
Subject: Re: Satanic Crime units?? Re: WoD: Frontline Report
Date: 26 Aug 92 16:34:31 GMT
Followup-To: alt.drugs
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Redmond,  OR.

>#	I'm pro-God, and I don't think you should be allowed to discuss
>#the merits or even the alternative of satan-loving on a network that is
>#partially government-funded.

If I remember right, didn't god create satan? So, what's the difference?

Mike
Xref: sparky alt.drugs:15109 misc.legal:16577 talk.politics.drugs:6008
From: kennii@wybbs.mi.org (Kenn "Jazz" Booth II)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,misc.legal,talk.politics.drugs
Subject: Re: Fort Wayne: Landlords Must Evict Drug-Dealing Tenants
Date: 27 Aug 92 16:14:22 GMT
Reply-To: kennii@wybbs.mi.org (Kenn "Jazz" Booth II)
Organization: Micro-Data Consultants

Quoted from bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Robert Church) in <1992Aug27.005224.12609@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu>
>... they can be sold at Revco like they should be.

Or at your neighborhood shoppe dealing in fine
tobacco's...
 


--
       _ _ _                  __
      ' ) ) )                /  )     _/_
       / / / o _. __  _ --- /  / __.  /  __.
      / ' (_<_(__/ (_(_)   /__/_(_/|_<__(_/|_
          C  O  N  S  U  L  T  A  N  T  S
       Kenn Booth II >-< kennii@wybbs.mi.org
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,talk.politics.drugs