HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cheung@eplrx7.es.duPont.com (Bryan Cheung)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: GCC for Intergraph C300
Date: 16 Dec 92 23:27:03 GMT
Followup-To: gnu.gcc.help
Organization: DuPont Engineering Physics Laboratory

Does anyone out there know if gcc has been ported to any UNIX 
workstations based on the Intergraph/Fairchild Clipper chip set
(C300)?? If so, where can it be obtained??

               Thanks in advance
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Trouble building gcc-2.3.2 on Ultrix 4.2
From: bruce-b@cs.aukuni.ac.nz (Bruce Benson)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:12:03 GMT
Followup-To: gnu.gcc.help
Organization: computer Science

I'm trying to build gcc-2.3.2 on a DECstation 5000/120 running Ultrix 4.2.
It gets to the point where it has built the first version of xgcc, then
tries to build a dummy library with it. This fails. eg.

cc -Wf,-XNg1500 -Olimit 3000 -O1  -DIN_GCC   -g   -o xgcc gcc.o version.o
obsta
./xgcc -dumpspecs > specs
echo "__foo () {}" > dummy.c
./xgcc -B./  -DIN_GCC   -g  -c dummy.c
ar qc libgcc1.null dummy.o

ar: Error: phase error on dummy.o
ar: Error: malformed archive (at 68)
make: *** [libgcc1.null] Error 1

The ar command just hangs until return is pressed. I've tried building it
with gcc instead of cc and always get the same result.

Any help would make my day go much better :-)

---
Bruce Benson.   	       	       	       	       ,_o ,__o
Department of Computer Science. 	       	     _-\_\,\_<,
University of Auckland. 	       	       	    (*)/'--/'(*)
b_benson@cs.aukuni.ac.nz
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: adams@pdv2.fmr.maschinenbau.th-darmstadt.de (Adams)
Subject: Re: gcc-2.3.2 problems on m68040
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:19:07 GMT
Organization: TH-Darmstadt

In article <3421@nlsun1.oracle.nl> jhelberg@nl.oracle.com (Joost Helberg) writes:
>
>   COMPILER:       gcc version 2.3.2
>   CONFIGURATION:  ./configure --target=m68k-sysv4
>   OS:             SINIX TOS 5.41
>   ARCH:           Targon31 (68040 multi)
>   MODIFICATION:   none
>   PROBLEM:        "gcc -O" generates a misoptimized code that causes
>		   missing lables in the linking fase
>
>   When compiling cccp with optimizing on, the fase1 as well as the fase2
>   compiler removes labels wich should be there:
>
>   $ make CC=gcc CFLAGS="-O" cccp
>	   gcc  -DIN_GCC   -O     -I. -I. -I./config \
>	     -DGCC_INCLUDE_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-sysv4/`sed -e 's/.*\"\
>   ([^ \"]*\)[ \"].*/\1/' < ./version.c`/include\" \
>	     -DGPLUSPLUS_INCLUDE_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/g++-include\" \
>	     -DLOCAL_INCLUDE_DIR=\"/usr/local/include\" \
>	     -DCROSS_INCLUDE_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-sysv4/`sed -e 's/.*\
>   "\([^ \"]*\)[ \"].*/\1/' < ./version.c`/sys-include\" \
>	     -DTOOLDIR=\"/usr/local/m68k-sysv4/\" \
>	     -c `echo ./cccp.c | sed 's,^\./,,'`
>	   gcc  -DIN_GCC   -O     -I. -I. -I./config -c ./cexp.c
>	   gcc  -DIN_GCC   -O   -o cccp cccp.o cexp.o version.o obstack.o ` case "g
   cc" in "cc") echo alloca.o ;; esac `
>   Undefined                       first referenced
>    symbol                             in file
>   .LD785                              cccp.o
>   .LD388                              cccp.o
>   .LD2020                             cccp.o
>   .LD279                              cexp.o
>   .LD1064                             cccp.o
>   .LD120                              cexp.o
>   .LD2175                             cccp.o
>   .LD350                              cexp.o
>   .LD155                              cccp.o
>   .LD777                              cccp.o
>   ld: cccp: fatal error: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to cccp
>   *** Error code 1 (bu21)
>
>
>   Part of the generated assembler in cccp.o:
>
>       cmp.l %d6,%a0
>       bcs.w .L779
>   .LI785:
>       mov.w .LD785(%pc,%a0.l*2),%d0
>       jmp 6(%pc,%d0.w)
>       .swbeg &6
>
>   Any suggestions??
>
>
>   --  
>      Joost Helberg                                Rijnzathe 6
>      jhelberg@oracle.nl                           NL-3454 PV De Meern
>      jhelberg@nl.oracle.com                       The Netherlands
>
>      Oracle Europe BV                             Product Line Development	
>      Phone: +31 3406 94211                        Fax:   +31 3406 65609
>
>

Well, you are using an SGS (software generation system) assembler
and you are running a version of System V.....

1) .LDxxxx symbols denotes local symbols, which should _never_ occur
as global symbols and never occur as external symbols, __BUT__
a lot of 68k System V assemblers do have this bug, and use another
prefix to denote local labels,  often "L%", in a undocumented manner.
( do a "strings" across your as, might help).

2) You will have to patch your backend.

best adams
From: jhelberg@nl.oracle.com (Joost Helberg)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: gcc-2.3.2 problems on m68040
Date: 15 Dec 92 08:53:58 GMT
Organization: Oracle Europe
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
              at Oracle Corporation.  The opinions expressed are those
              of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.

COMPILER:       gcc version 2.3.2
CONFIGURATION:  ./configure --target=m68k-sysv4
OS:             SINIX TOS 5.41
ARCH:           Targon31 (68040 multi)
MODIFICATION:   none
PROBLEM:        "gcc -O" generates a misoptimized code that causes
                missing lables in the linking fase

When compiling cccp with optimizing on, the fase1 as well as the fase2
compiler removes labels wich should be there:

$ make CC=gcc CFLAGS="-O" cccp
        gcc  -DIN_GCC   -O     -I. -I. -I./config \
          -DGCC_INCLUDE_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-sysv4/`sed -e 's/.*\"\
([^ \"]*\)[ \"].*/\1/' < ./version.c`/include\" \
          -DGPLUSPLUS_INCLUDE_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/g++-include\" \
          -DLOCAL_INCLUDE_DIR=\"/usr/local/include\" \
          -DCROSS_INCLUDE_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-sysv4/`sed -e 's/.*\
"\([^ \"]*\)[ \"].*/\1/' < ./version.c`/sys-include\" \
          -DTOOLDIR=\"/usr/local/m68k-sysv4/\" \
          -c `echo ./cccp.c | sed 's,^\./,,'`
        gcc  -DIN_GCC   -O     -I. -I. -I./config -c ./cexp.c
        gcc  -DIN_GCC   -O   -o cccp cccp.o cexp.o version.o obstack.o ` case "g
cc" in "cc") echo alloca.o ;; esac `
Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
.LD785                              cccp.o
.LD388                              cccp.o
.LD2020                             cccp.o
.LD279                              cexp.o
.LD1064                             cccp.o
.LD120                              cexp.o
.LD2175                             cccp.o
.LD350                              cexp.o
.LD155                              cccp.o
.LD777                              cccp.o
ld: cccp: fatal error: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to cccp
*** Error code 1 (bu21)


Part of the generated assembler in cccp.o:

    cmp.l %d6,%a0
    bcs.w .L779
.LI785:
    mov.w .LD785(%pc,%a0.l*2),%d0
    jmp 6(%pc,%d0.w)
    .swbeg &6

Any suggestions??


--  
   Joost Helberg                                Rijnzathe 6
   jhelberg@oracle.nl                           NL-3454 PV De Meern
   jhelberg@nl.oracle.com                       The Netherlands

   Oracle Europe BV                             Product Line Development	
   Phone: +31 3406 94211                        Fax:   +31 3406 65609
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman)
Subject: Help!
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 20:09:41 GMT

Apple's look and feel lawsuit attacks the freedom of programmers
generally.  Today's suit has just two defendants, but indirectly it
attacks all of us.

You appear to work at Apple.  Whether or not you personally support
the lawsuit, to help you install GCC on a machine at your office (at
Apple, it would seem) would be directly helping Apple business.  I
sometimes do favors for strangers, but not for strangers like Apple
that are trying to hurt me.  I hope other readers feel the same.

I am sending this message because (1) perhaps you personally don't
realize what a bad thing your employer is doing, and (2) perhaps some
of the other readers don't realize either.

Perhaps you personally don't approve of Apple's lawsuit.  If so, you
can show you really mean it by starting a political discussion of
whether it is unethical and whether Apple is morally obligated to stop
it.  This requires some courage--management will order you to stop,
and you will have to refuse on the grounds that everyone has a duty to
consider an issue of conscience--but showing courage is what can
demonstrate that people should not blame you for what Apple does.


Those readers who think they are allowed to write programs and won't
get sued for doing so, should read the information published by the
LPF about the danger of monopolies in software.  Then, if they'd like
something to be done about the problem, they can join the LPF.

The League for Programming Freedom is an organization that works to
protect programmers' freedom to write software, opposing enforced
monopolies such as Apple wants to create.  The LPF is not a free
software organization and is not related to the GNU project.

More information about the LPF is available in the directory doc/lpf
on ftp.uu.net.  To contact the LPF, send mail to lpf@uunet.uu.net.

You too can join the LPF; some Apple employees are already members.
From: eks@daimi.aau.dk (Eigil Krogh S|rensen)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: C <-> Pascal
Date: 20 Dec 92 15:01:34 GMT
Organization: DAIMI: Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, Denmark




On  Motorola systemV68  R3V5.1 UNIX  (3300/68030-based) and  SCO UNIX -
i486   I   need    to   call   Pascal   (Oregon    Software   Pascal-2)
procedures/functions from C programs.

For  that reason  I must  know exactly  how C  respective Pascal passes
parameters to  functions/procedures and  how different  types (integer,
float, real, string etc.) are stored in memory.

Proposals (e.g. literature)  about where/how to find  information about
all or part of this are most welcome.

Thank you in advance.


Eigil Krogh Sorensen.
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: jboller@is.morgan.COM (John Boller)
Subject: NeXT and GCC 2.2.2
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 04:13:56 GMT

Hi,
I am having serious problems trying to compile
GCC 2.2.2 on a NeXT station running NeXT Step 3.0!
Is there a preferred configuration to use other
than "next" or "m68k-next-4.3bsd" ?

I have not gotten a successful installation yet.

thanks, jboller@is.morgan.com
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: tener@cs.widener.edu (Stuart Tener)
Subject: help getting object gnu c
Organization: Widener University Department of Computer Science, Chester PA
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 23:44:57 GMT

I have no C compiler, and really need one. I am running AT&T and ESIX
svr4, and will want something that is compliant.

thank you,

stuart b. tener
(215)-338-6005
tener@cs.widener.edu
From: sumant@ntd.comsat.com (Sumant Hattikudur)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: compiling gcc for Solaris 2.1 ?
Date: 15 Dec 92 03:59:28 GMT
Distribution: gnu
Organization: COMSAT Labs
NNTP-Posting-Host: spica.ntd.comsat.com


Since Sun is not bundling a C compiler with Solaris 2.1, how does one
compile and install 'gcc'?  Please mail me a copy of your answer if you
plan to post the reply.  Thanks,

-Sumant.
--
===========================================================================
Sumant M. Hattikudur				Phone: 	(301) 428-4215 (O) 
NTD, Room 3143						
COMSAT Labs					E-mail: sumant@ntd.comsat.com 
22300 Comsat Drive				UUnet : comlabs!sumant
Clarksburg, MD 20871.
============================================================================
From: jprovo@Gnu.ai.mit.edu (Genetic Jones)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: help! gcc2.3.1 on sgi4d/30 [for that matter, bison too...]
Date: 19 Dec 1992 04:33:45 GMT
Organization: Russell Street UN*X Consultations
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: wombat.gnu.ai.mit.edu
Summary: follow-up for clarification

If you didn't think my earlier post needed clarification, then please skip
this. As I've been flamed a bit, I would rather work out understanding instead
of creating a war....



jprovo@Gnu.ai.mit.edu (Genetic Jones) writes:
[vendor left things -- chiefly a compiler&libs set-- on machine that i was
hired to take care of]

I have no knowledge of what is bought/not -- I work with what they give me,
what I write and what i can find.  I was flamed for this article claiming that
I was stealing an SGI product.  I have not done such; I was under the
impression that we _had_ the compiler.  Sorry if you feel 'ignorance is no
excuse', but it is one of mine.


[what I had and trying to make gcc while figuring out what the vendor had dobne
in the first place; sgi header files using #ifdef's; the point I reached with
bison; system setup]

> misleading me to think that I was in the clear as far as a development
>environment went...[grumble]

...the final (and original) point being: is there *anything* that I can make 
        with the kernel bootstrapping tools, or should i fold in and get the
        lab folk to shell out for a level of the development option.

Sorry, but I *was* under the impression that this is gnu.gcc.HELP, not
bug-report, not .misc.discuss, nor any other.

anyway, email help to jzp@gene.ummed.edu would be MUCH appreciated.

thanks again,
joe provo


-- 
Disclaimer: "I'm the only one foolish enough to claim these opinions as mine."
jprovo@gnu.ai.mit.edu                                       jzp@gene.ummed.edu
    Russell Street UN*X Consultations and Development     (NIC handle: JZP)
                            Rev. Dkr. Nick LaRG0, ASC
From: steiny@steiny.com (Don Steiny)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Version compatibility?
Date: 20 Dec 92 02:21:59 GMT
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Don Steiny Software



	I am attempting to get gcc 2.3.2, libg++2.3, gdb4-7 working on my
system and I have some questions that someone out there may know the 
answer to.

	It seems to me that I have to get gcc working first, then libg++, then
gdb.  (Though the last two may not matter).   However, I notice that one
of the include directories in the makefile for gcc is 
/usr/local/lib/lib-gcc/g++-includes.    The directory exists, but it contains
the includes from gcc 2.2.2, the previous version I got mostly working.
Is that going to create problems?

	This is about the third try on my part (it takes many hours to build
gcc) to get gcc 2.3.2 working, and I am not sure what I am doing wrong.  

	First, when I built it and tried to compile using g++ with the -g
flag I would get an error that L_T51 could not be found.   Sure enough the
label was in the assembler code with a assembler directive.   I will submit
a formal bug report if this is not just due to some obvious screw-up on 
my part.

	Second, when I compiled a regular C program, the step option did not
work in my gdb.   I was using 4-6 and had not gotten 4-7 up.   I assume that
problem will go away if I upgrade to 4-7.

	gcc does not seem to recognize file suffixes and always gives me 
a link error if I do not explicitly call g++ for C++ programs.     

	When I try to compile with the new gcc, I get many errors from 
the include files.

	I should note that the fixincludes script does not seem to run to
completion, but I don't think that should make any difference for g++.  I
can just manually create the proper directory and copy the files in and 
it seems to allow gcc to run.  

	I am on SVR4 on a 486, using a rather obscure UNIX (Microport), but
I believe it is just the same as USL with some extra drivers and a few 
performance enhancements.   In other words, the compiler and libraries are
just the same.

	I think that all of this may just be one problem that is cascading
and I wonder if my description looks familiar to anyone.   If not, I will
post detailed bug reports.  

	Thanks for your help!!

-don
-- 
Don Steiny
Don Steiny Software
Santa Cruz, CA 95060
(408) 425-0382
To: gnu-gcc-announce@uunet.uu.net
From: kushmer@bnlux1.bnl.gov (christopher kushmerick)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.os.vms
Subject: Survey: gcc on VMS
Date: 15 Dec 92 00:19:09 GMT
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory
Distribution: world
Approved: info-gnu@prep.ai.mit.edu
Followup-To: gnu.gcc.help,comp.os.vms

Are you running gcc on VMS? If so, what version. Is it stable? Where did
you get it?


Signed,

Looking to find the most recent most stable verion of gcc-VMS


Thanks,

-- 
Chris Kushmerick
kushmer@bnlux1.bnl.gov

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: keane@eng.umd.edu (Christopher Matthews Keane)
Subject: Swab and dynamic arrays
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 20:37:00 GMT
Organization: Project GLUE, University of Maryland, College Park

As relatively new to GNU C and using a SUN workstation, I have 2 quick
questions.
1) I received a response concerning a question concerning the binary
representation of data on a SUN vs. a PC.  I lost that address, could
that person or another please send me a short code on how to use
swab() to change data from little-endian to big-endian... I am not
having much luck finding useful docs concerning this function.

2) I thought I remember seeing a mention that GNU C can handle dynamic
array allocation.  I realize that this is easily mimicked using
malloc(), etc.. but is this a truth or fantasy?  If it exists, what
are the limitations?

Sorry if this is a FAQ - but if a FAQ exists for this group, can
someone please point me to it?!?!?!
Cheers
Christopher Keane
keane@earthsun.umd.edu
From: betsys@cs.umb.edu (Elizabeth Schwartz)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: ANSWER: Re: What's the size limit for a GCC macro expansion?
Date: 14 Dec 92 03:44:16 GMT
Distribution: gnu
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Boston

Thanks to those, including rms, who responded so quickly. GNU C
doesn't have built-in limits, wherever possible. In my case I was
running out of space in /usr/tmp when my expansion got to be around
64k.
Thanks, Betsy
--
System Administrator                  Internet: betsys@cs.umb.edu
MACS Dept, UMass/Boston               BITNET:ESCHWARTZ%UMBSKY.DNET@NS.UMB.EDU
100 Morrissey Blvd                    Staccato signals
Boston, MA 02125-3393                      of constant information....
From: tener@cs.widener.edu (Stuart Tener)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: need gcc binarys for ESIX or AT&T SVR4
Date: 20 Dec 92 17:43:24 GMT
Organization: Widener University Department of Computer Science, Chester PA
NNTP-Posting-Host: lucy.cs.widener.edu


	I am looking for binarys for the gcc compiler for ESIX and/or
	AT&T 386 based SVR4. If anyone can tell me where I can ftp this
	stuff from or can email it to me that would most helpful. I have
	no C compiler, and do indeed need one.

	thank you,

	stuart b. tener
	tener@cs.widener.edu
	(215)-338-6005
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,gnu.g++.help,gnu.misc.discuss
From: boehme@unvax.union.edu (Eric M. Boehm)
Subject: Looking for gcc for mach 2.5a
Keywords: mach 2.5a hard-params.c cpp gcc gnu
Reply-To: Eric.Boehm@union.edu
Organization: Union College, Schenectady, NY
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 03:37:27 GMT

I have tried to compile gcc-2.2.2 and gcc-2.3.2 on a Sun 3/260 running
Mach 2.5a. The compile consistently dies after creating a new cpp. The
Mach c compiler does not like what the new cpp spits out.

I then tried compiling gcc-1.42. This goes OK until it tries to
compile hard-params.c. It dies with a lot of syntax errors. 

I tried gcc-mods.tar.Z from ernst.mach.cs.cmu.edu but I am not sure
what version of gcc this was for. It doesn't work in any event. 

Can anyone tell me how to get gcc running under Mach 2.5a?

Thanks in advance.

-- 
Eric M. Boehm
Eric.Boehm@union.edu
BOEHME@UNION.BITNET
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: jason@jarthur.claremont.edu (Jason Merrill)
Subject: asm syntax in gcc?
Organization: Minimal
Date: 12 Dec 92 16:36:21

Some of the system headers on our machine (Sequent Symmetry, Dynix 3.1.2)
seem to use a different syntax for "asm" directives.  For instance:

asm void S_LOCK(laddr)
{
%reg laddr; lab loop, spin, done;
/PEEPOFF
loop:	movb	$L_LOCKED, %al
	xchgb	%al, (laddr)		/* an atomic "test and set" */
	cmpb	$L_UNLOCKED, %al
	je	done			/* if equal, we got the lock */
spin:	cmpb	$L_UNLOCKED, (laddr)	/* spin in cache until unlocked */
	je	loop			/* then, try get lock again */
	jmp	spin
done:
/PEEPON
%mem laddr; lab loop, spin, done;
/PEEPOFF
loop:	movb	$L_LOCKED, %al
	movl	laddr, %ecx
	xchgb	%al, (%ecx)		/* an atomic "test and set" */
	cmpb	$L_UNLOCKED, %al
	je	done			/* if equal, we got the lock */
spin:	cmpb	$L_UNLOCKED, (%ecx)	/* spin in cache until unlocked */
	je	loop			/* then, try get lock again */
	jmp	spin
done:
/PEEPON
}

How does this differ from the gcc asm syntax?  What would be equivalent
code that gcc would accept?

--
Jason Merrill					jason@jarthur.claremont.edu
From: dak@tabaqui.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (David Kastrup)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: Influence of cache to performance on 386/486
Date: 13 Dec 92 15:41:53 GMT
Organization: Rechnerbetrieb Informatik - RWTH Aachen
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: tabaqui.informatik.rwth-aachen.de
Keywords: cache

in11rwfg@sbusol.rz.uni-sb.de (Fred Gerber) writes:


>We are planning to implement a high performance compiler 
>for a functional language on a MS-DOS machine with a 
>386DX Chip + 387 and accordingly a 486DX.
>We want to use also an explicit management of the 1. and 2.level
>cache.
>We are using the distribution of gnu gcc 1.39 on 386 and 
>we have some trouble.

This version is pretty outdated.

>Has anybody ported the gcc to a 486 platform?

the gcc-2 family supports 486. You can configure generation of 386 or
486 code, and override with compilation switches.

>Do we gain something using a specialized 486 gcc portation (
>not only speed) ?

Both codes will run on both sorts of machines, but code generation is
specially optimized for the requested target.
From: jprovo@Gnu.ai.mit.edu (Genetic Jones)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: help! gcc2.3.1 on sgi4d/30 [for that matter, bison too...]
Date: 16 Dec 1992 05:38:12 GMT
Organization: Russel Street UN*X and Caffeine
NNTP-Posting-Host: wombat.gnu.ai.mit.edu
Summary: am i boned with only bootstrapping tools? [irix4.0.5]

...so, here I am, finally getting around to building gcc becuase  we only
'accidentally' had a compiler before a recent upgrade [aren't vendors GREAT] 
...I know, I know -- bad joe, don't put off building Important Tools again...

But the question is, *shouldn't* I be able to build the Things I Need given
    - kernel bootstraps
    - leftover header files
    - leftover libraries

Previously, I was stopped by only having as1 [and no as0] in the bootstrap
zone... now, after Yet Another Upgrade, I seem to have a happy 'strapping cc,
and I get thru the gcc build until it begs for bison....so I grab the bison 
sources and find the header files filled with #idents...so I comment ALL of 
them out, and die on:
# make
        cc -c -g   -I./../include LR0.c
cc: Error: ANSI C is not installed. (could not find /usr/lib/accom)
*** Error code 1

...sigh.  For those who tuned in late, or hate to read subj/summaries, this is
on a silly-graph 4d/30, upgraded from irix3.3.2 to 4.0.1 and now to 4.0.5. NO
'developer's option' -- we had bits and pieces leftover from a vendor's
boo-boo, misleading me to think that I was in the clear as far as a development
environment went...[grumble]

As usual, simply more weight on the side of free software....

joe, waiting for the HURD....



-- 
Disclaimer: "I'm the only one foolish enough to claim these opinions as mine."
jprovo@gnu.ai.mit.edu                                       jzp@gene.ummed.edu
    Russell Street UN*X Consultations and Development     (NIC handle: JZP)
                            Rev. Dkr. Nick LaRG0, ASC