HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: paladin@rajeesh.WPI.EDU (Vaughn Gross)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: XMEN:TAS-load of crap
Date: 9 Nov 92 16:27:28 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: rajeesh.wpi.edu

In article <9NOV199209482264@zeus.tamu.edu> dlm4731@zeus.tamu.edu (MAREK, DAVID LESLIE) writes:
>Things that I've noticed about the cartoon that turn my stomach:
>
>1)The watercolored backgrounds look like a three year old did them

i agree the animation overall could have been better...
then again... i myself couldn't do so well.. so i annot really complain much...

>2)The characters are so stereotypical it's an insult to the character of
>  the person.

yah... basically true... then again what child is gonna want character 
development on a saturday morning cartoon... two dimensional characters are
what tv excells at...

>3)Rogue's eyes are blue, not brown damn it

ummmm.... actually they are green... or at least they are in nearly ever issue
of X-men i have ever read... i dunno if they changed that recently or not..

>4)The people in the cartonn do not walk, they all kink of "lurch".

true... as i said... the animation could be much improved... the movement to
put it bluntly... sucks... then again... most of what i watch is either people
or anime... and most anime the movement is smooth..

>5)When Jubilee was captured and held, there was no obvious restraints
>  to her power.  They should have put something over her hands, not just
>  simply bind her wrists.

well... we'll leave that to suspension of belief... and if you noticed when 
they looked at a monitor in the beginning of the second episode jubilee was 
sitting there when she shoudl have been in the facility in denver..

>6)The fat that Cyclops leaves the Beast and Morph(who is a stupid character
>  they should have used the Mimic) and left is a load of crap.  The Xmen are a
>  team, if one of 'em goes down, they try to get 'em out.  Especially because
>  he didn't know if they were dead or not.

i'll leave this one to the suspension of intelligence... and supposed plot 
development...

 Paladin (ever shifting bearlike being....)	     
     Reality	       | " Wouldn't you laugh if your head exploded???  
 		       |	 No.... I guess you wouldn't.....	 
 paladin@wpi.wpi.edu   |   I would."   (Nosage, June 91)

human is the foulest name i can ever call a person......
From: sk2f+@andrew.cmu.edu (Seth D. Kadesh)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: XTAS synopsis?
Date: 9 Nov 92 06:15:17 GMT
Organization: Junior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

can someone post/mail a synopsis for me - i overslept and missed the
second episode.  thanks.

  seth ---> sk2f@andrew.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: cffitzge@IASTATE.EDU (Charles F Fitzgerald)
Subject: Re: Cable/Stryfe
Reply-To: cffitzge@IASTATE.EDU (Charles F Fitzgerald)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 03:21:34 GMT

Chris wirtes
>...if you were to travel  
>back in time to meet yourself (or battle yourself...) wouldn't that create one 
>of those nasty little paradoxes, that would 'blow up the entire universe'  
>(according to the doc in back to the future...)

It seems to me that it depends totally upon the version of time travel one 
adopts.  There are several to choose from, the jigsaw puzzle theory (the best,
and
most humorous, application of which occurs in _Bill and Ted's Excellent
Adventure_), 
the alternate timeline theory (see "Mozart in Mirrorshades" in the Cyberpunk 
anthology _Mirrorshades_ edited by Sterling for an interesting view of 
this one), or the ever-popular Marvel time-travel theory.  

Since the discussion on time/dimension travel has _finally_ let up on 
this newsgroup, I don't want to get into the nuts and bolts of the physics of 
Marvel time-travel theory.  Suffice it to say, that the theory is vague and 
generally made up to suit a given author's necessity.

With this observation, whether or not a paradox occurred would be up to the
author and how it fit in his storyline.  If the paradox helped him out of a
tight spot, the paradox would occur; if he wanted the characters to meet each
other, they would.  Pretty simple really.

Or should that be stupid?:=)

P.S. as an aside, (since it really has nothing to do with the xbooks) the
time travel theory in _Back to the Future_ is really quite similar to the
Marvel time travel theory, diplaying elements of both the jigsaw and the
alternate timelime theories to suit the particular movie at a particular
time.
----
Charles F. Fitzgerald | "Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow,
Iowa State University | Creeps in this petty pace, from Day to Day, 
cffitzge@iastate.edu  | To the last syllable of Recorded Time...."
                      | _MacBeth_, by W. Shakespeare.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: jatg5423@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John A. Ternent)
Subject: Beginner's FAQ : Summary of X-Men/backgrounds/etc
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 03:53:01 GMT

Hi, all.

Sorry if this is an FAQ (can't say the header didn't warn you!), but
I am an X-Men newbie (saw the sneak preview/played the game/thinking
about buying the books) and am trying to get some background on the
characters. I read both FAQLs and got the X-Men Files, but none of
these addressed who the characters are, what their backgrounds are,
what their powers are, and so on. Is there such a file?

Thanks,

John Ternent
jatg5423@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: phi@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Aeleck)
Subject: Re: Cyclops' eye beams
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:21:50 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.133246.3683@decuk.uvo.dec.com> mobey@arrods.enet.dec.com (arrods::mobey) writes:
>    didn't cyclops use pulsed eye beams to save wolvie from a fall
>    during the Claremont/Byrne run
>    I think it was in the savage land

Nope, but close.  It was on Muir Island during the Mutant X/Proteus
plotline.  I believe it was in either 126 or 127....(anyone know which?)

The Old Man and the .Net,
Aeleck                 /                  /  
                      /                  /        
     __      __      /   __      __     /         
    /  \    /  \    /   /  \    /  \   / \        "If you're not having
   /   /   /\__/   /   /\__/   /      /\_/         fun, you're doing some-
   \__/\__/\___/__/\__/\___/__/\___/ /   \__/      thing wrong." -Patrick

             Hate is not a family value.  Boycott Colorado
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: jed@matilda.vut.edu.au (Jed Bowtell)
Subject: Re: The X-Men Movie Cast (Repost from racm)
Organization: Victoria University of Technology
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 02:09:20 GMT

jmw20@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Joshua Michael Wolf) writes:

>Psylocke: Sharon Stone.  Definitely.

Just one problem. Psylocke has an Asian appearance. The
body definately fits the bill though. I think Psylocke
would be one of the hardest to cast. Maybe they could
just leave her out. That brings up a question. Which
characters do you think they would choose? Which
characters do you think they should choose? Hey that's
two questions.

Jed
Organization: University of Central Florida--Computer Services
Date: Thursday, 12 Nov 1992 01:10:56 EST
From: Tad Simmons <SIMMONS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Gyrich pronounciation (was Re: Jean Grey's Non-Codename)
 <kf0_rr200awJEAnVoR@andrew.cmu.edu>

>> WRT the animated series... I'd always pronounced Henry Peter Gyrich's last
>name
>> as JIErich (like gyro), not GEERick.  Are there earlier pronounciation
>> references?
>
I've always called him something more like grrrICK...
Besides, when have we ever considered anything on TV to be anything but an
anternate dimension?

Tad "contemplating life as either Contrary Kid or Typo teh Encridable" Simmons
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: 910252m@dragon.acadiau.ca (Dwayne MacKinnon)
Subject: Re: X-Men: The MovieOkay, since there's been plenty of talk about the new X-Men animated
Organization: Acadia University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 23:33:06 GMT



People:
    I posted this on racm, I'll do it again here. My vote for Jean Grey goes to
Joanne Whalley-Kilmer. Check out Willow, you'll see why.
    If I come up with casting suggestions for other people, I'll get back to 
you.

DMK
Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada.

"Let the foils be brought, the gentlemen willing, and the King hold his 
purpose; I will win for him if I can; If not, I will gain nothing but my shame,
and the odd hits." - Puck quoting Shakespeare in The Crossing Line
From: masulliv@ecs.umass.edu (Michael Sullivan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: About Uncanny X-Men #296
Date: 7 Nov 92 10:19:03 GMT

In article <06NOV92.16072835.0098@VM1.MCGILL.CA>, CXMP@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA (CXMP) writes:
> 
> *SPOILERS*
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
<lots o' stuff deleted> 
> 
> 
> 
> page 2 - Jean has never before demonstrated the ability to hold back
>          Scott's eye-blasts.  It was the clone of Jean Grey that was
>          the host of the Phoenix that was able to do so in Uncanny
>          X-Men #133 not Jean.  Of course, Jean is more powerful now than
>          she was when she was Marvel Girl so we'll forgive this and just
>          put it down to all their years of training together.

Actually, I believe Jean did bloack his optic blasts before.  It was in 
X-Factor when the original team was still living in ship.  I believe
they finished training and she held back his optic blasts when
he took his visor off.  He mentions being uncomfortable about this, sinc
only the clone had done it before.

> I'll take a moment here to say something about Lobdell's writing: he
> *can* write scripts but he has trouble writing plots.  A good example
> of this is Excalibur #59-60 in which we are introduced to villians that
> appear quite ominous at first and then we're supposed to feel sorry for
> them (huh?).  Also, there's the glaring plot holes: what was Icon's
> motivation, how does a resident of an old age home learn about where a
> terrorist would hide a bomb, how did Brian get back into the cage
> without someone realizing he was "Jungle Man", why was the cage used on
> Brian and not on Iron Man and how come Captain America is acting as the
> American diplomat to Wakanda.
> 
I'm not sure what you mean about the cage being used on Brian and not 
Iron Man, altough I can't find that issue right now.  I don't think
T'challa knew who Braddock really was, or Meggan for that matter,
so he put them in the dome for their own safety.

Well, time to go tape X-Men TAS

					Mike S.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: jmw20@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Joshua Michael Wolf)
Subject: Re: jean, scott, and optic blasts
Reply-To: jmw20@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Joshua Michael Wolf)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 18:07:30 GMT

In article <BxJDCE.o2@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Thanatos) writes:
>
>Think of the "Can I hold it back" arguement this way.  Cyclops has been needing
>a power upgrade for a loong time (long by fanboy standards, anyway).  So 
>Lobdell laid it on the line, and said that he "can pulverize adamantium." 
>Since Jean can create a field over his eyes, and keep the effect at bay, 
>ergo her TK is stronger than adamantium.  Boy will wolvie be pissed now.
>No wonder they created carbonadium...
>
Actually, this blooper isn't that hard to explain.  One word: adrenalin.
Surely, Cyclops must be able, to some extent, to control the power of hi
blasts- like holding back a punch.  But when he gets real pissed (like when he
blows up Apocalypse), the adrenalin in his body pumps up his blasts so much
that they CAN in fact, pulverize adamantium.
God, I can't believe I just defended Lobdell....

//Josh
From: mccoyje@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: The X-Men Movie Cast (Repost from racm)
Date: 5 Nov 92 18:08:20 CST
Distribution: world
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <1damkfINNhar@maico.ksu.ksu.edu>, lazarus@maico.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith) writes:
> 
>>In article <1992Nov4.124805.1@skcla.monsanto.com> jjfink@skcla.monsanto.com
>>writes:
>>>while Wolvie could be young, there was that ridiculous story with
>>>him in WWII
Yeah, but you are forgetting that Maverick, Wolverine, Sabretooth and
Wraith all have an age-suppressing trait. Check out the Dec. issue of
Wolverine.
-- 
"Sleep -- those little slices of death -- how I loathe them!"
					-- Edgar A. Poe
"I am the way!"
	-- Pinhead
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: uplink@cwis.unomaha.edu (John M. Scheibeler)
Subject: Hi!
Summary: just to show Drizzt I have posted
Keywords: test
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 06:21:55 GMT

	This is a test.  This is also to show Drizzt I've posted in the last
30 days on this newsgroup.  This is only a test.

uplink
.s
--
* "Hal, open the pod bay doors."      | The above opinions must be mine, *
* "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that."  | since they aren't anyone else's! *
* "Hal, I have an axe."               +-------+ Send all EMAIL to :      *
* "Dave, I control the decompression system." | uplink@cwis.unomaha.edu  *
From: aodn307@bongo.cc.utexas.edu (Joshua Henry Geurink)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: X-Men Movie - What To Consider Besides the Cast
Date: 11 Nov 92 15:23:24 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX


There IS, repeat IS a script.  I came REALLY close to buying it at GenCon,
but instead left it for a friend (That never did purchase the durned thing.
Oh, well).

Regardless, it's out there...

=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
King Rat                     |  "You got the power, (Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!)
aka Josh Geurink             |   You got the might, (No Way!)
aodn307@bongo.cc.utexas.edu  |   Get ready for battle, (Give me your money!)
                  Defeat the Black Knight!"
`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: What Happen To Beast
From: ctodd@jupiter (christopher todd)
Date: 9 Nov 92 14:35:47 EST
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4



	Could someone help I watched the X:TAS and I saw beast get captured
	and Morh die.  I would like someone to anwser this question.  When the  	X-men went to rescue Julbile did they rescue Beast as well?







							Thanks 
							Christopher
From: dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu (David Henry)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: About Uncanny X-Men #296
Date: 10 Nov 92 06:06:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.BxHKzG.J2D
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

In article <9211100526.AA06767@hrt216.brooks.af.mil> smd@hrt216.brooks.af.mil
(Sten M. Drescher) writes:
>On 9 Nov 92 20:22:21 GMT, dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu (David Henry) said:
>
> David> can we? Why, that would ruin the plot! Hey, why don't we bring
> David> back Jean Grey, that Phoenix woman, while we're at it... oops!
> David> Too late!
>
>	Did you pick up on what I did about their escape ploy?  If I
>remember correctly (which I may not, since I'm not Obscure Trivia Lad
>and I son't have a complete set of all apprearances of Cyclops), wasn't
>the only time Jean Grey's TK was powerful enough to hold back Cyke's
>optic blasts when she was actually Phoenix?  Personally, I don't think
>we need 'Dark Phoenix II' or 'Phoenix vs Phoenix'.

I think you're vastly overcomplementing Obscure Trivia Lad, there, Sten,
but that's okay, he needs the encouragement.

The only time the real Jean Grey could hold back Cyke's beams was when she
was Phoenix, I agree. Then, she was reanimated by The FanBoys...
much horror has ensued from that fateful moment.

-- 
David R. Henry - Rogue Fan Club - OBESSA CANTAUIT - Ouch. --Richard Darwin
"Message for TJ Teru." --Roger Robot // What was the question? --Kate Bush
"All you of Earth are IDIOTS!"-P9fOS // Thanks... for the memories.--Rogue
dhenry@plains.nodak.edu * ud137927@ndsuvm1.bitnet * ud137927@vm1.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: ter5424@ritvax.isc.rit.edu (T-Dub - SGP '92)
Subject: Re: X-men TAS -- More errors?
Reply-To: ter5424@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 15:32:06 GMT

In article <92314.011910WRS114@psuvm.psu.edu>, Bill Simoni <WRS114@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>Two more errors(?) that myself and friends seemed to notice during part 2.
>
>1) During the scene with Scott at the house of Jubilee's foster parents.
>Isn't he wearing normal sunglasses and not ruby quartz.  This is probably
>just a coloring error as they have it right in scenes before and after.
>

Yep, it was a coloring error.  It took me a minute to figure out that that
*was* Cyclops.  I kept saying to myself, "It looks like Cyclops, but it can't
be because he doesn't have his correct glasses on"......

                                              Theron

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: ter5424@ritvax.isc.rit.edu (T-Dub - SGP '92)
Subject: Re: X-Men
Reply-To: ter5424@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 15:25:10 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.045101.6832@scott.skidmore.edu>, jholstei@scott.skidmore.edu (jeremy holstein) writes:
>dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu (David Henry) writes:
>> >>>Who the Hell is this morph guy on the X-men cartoon?
>> >>>I haven't read the comic book in a while But I don't think this character
>> >>>has been in anything.
>> >>>Am I wrong?
>> >>	Morph was a character specially created for the TV series.  I think
>> >>he buys the farm in the second show, but I'm not sure.
>> >Actually, I heard that Morph is based on a character from around issue
>> >100 of XMen called Chameleon.  
>> 
>> Close, Elisabeth, but not quite. Chameleon showed up in the original X-Men
>> series, around issues #40-50, if I remember correctly.
>
>Try issue two of Spider Man.  I believe the Chameleon was the one who
>died in Professor X's place back in X-men #42.
>And, no.  I don't think Morph is based upon the character.  I think
>he's more based upon his name-sake, the pprocess dreamed up by ILM.
>-- 
>This is my sig file.

I thought that Morph was based upon the X-Men character, Changeling, not the
Chameleon, who was a mainstay in the Spiderman comics and appeared in it not
that long ago.  The Chameleon can take on the guise of other people, but
Changeling could actually change all his physical features to look like another
person and in the process, didn't he take on some of their powers of something
too?  Not sure about the later, but I'm pretty sure I read in a magazine
interview with the shows creators that this was who Morph was patterned after.

                                                   Theron

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: stevenra@feserve.cc.purdue.edu (Alex Stevens)
Subject: Re: X-Men: The MovieOkay, since there's been plenty of talk about the new X-Men animated
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 23:30:54 GMT

In article <BxBMrt.FoC@matilda.vut.edu.au> jed@matilda.vut.edu.au (Jed Bowtell) writes:
>How about
>
>Wolverine - The Indian tracker type guy from Predator
	
	YES!!!!!!!!!!! Someone else remembered him!  I was struggling to 
remember which movie he was in. Everyone stop reading and watch Predator,
he may be Native, but he's perfect!!!

Alex
stevenra@feserve.cc.purdue.edu
From: aj005b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Hulk get mad!)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: xmen.magneto
Keywords: xmen
Date: 12 Nov 92 02:08:55 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Nov05.150347.4653@microsoft.com> marcsch@microsoft.com (Marc Schermerhorn) writes:


>Can anyone send me a copy of the previously posted Claremont
>files?? I tried to go back and look at them but was unable to locate them. 
>Also, if anyone could help me settle a debate-----do ya REALLY think Magneto's
>dead???????? 

>Thank

	Magneto isn't dead.  We don't know he died, all we saw was a picture
of him fading away with some of the Acolytes.  He was supposedly died while 
asteroid M was vaporized in a nuclear attack.  Yeah right!
	Magneto is the mater of magnetism, nuclear weapons give off electro-
magnetic energy, the outer atmosphere is infused with other electromagnetic 
energies.  Magneto's alive, and he's brooding.
	He will return and give huge speaches so the writers can make
themselves look really smart.  The artists will draw pictures of Magneto
standing over all the defeated X-men.
						the Dark Ghost has spoken
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: brad@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Brad Barton)
Subject: Re: X-Force #17 and High Lords (was RE: Origins)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 17:24:14 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <1992Nov2.040009.15192@njitgw.njit.edu> bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler) writes:
>In article <visser.720589885@convex.convex.com> visser@convex.com (Lance Visser) writes:
>>	I hate every last bit of this highlord nonsense and I was hoping
>>that it had died.  The point of it from a story sense is to create another
>>"class" of mutants because mutants are totally ununique in marvel books
>>these days.
>
>The way I see it, they're going to use this as an opportunity to
>close up any loose ends with the Highlords, and then drop the entire
>idea altogether.  At least, I hope that's what they do. If this is
>actually what they have planned, I can endure a few more stories
>involving the Highlords, if I know that they'll be the last ones.
>
I figured they would also use it to help explain why Sabretooth is so danged
hard to kill permanently.. but since the Shiva storyline, all bets are off.hard to kill permanently.. but since the Shiva storyline, all bets are off. 


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
|            Brad Barton -- brad@cmptrc.lonestar.org          |
|  "No matter how hard you throw a dead fish into the water,  |
|   it still won't swim."    -- Marian Stevens                |
---------------------------------------------------------------
From: jd53@prism.gatech.EDU (DE LA COVA,JORGE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Animated Series
Date: 9 Nov 92 14:20:59 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

Since, it's obvious that X:TAS has its faults and that its
creative team should have these pointed out, does anyone know where
I can write/e-mail them?

Please post or e-mail me.

Thanks.
-- 
DE LA COVA,JORGE
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!jd53
Internet: jd53@prism.gatech.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: caw@gtech.com (Christopher A. White)
Subject: Re: The X-Men Movie Cast (Repost from racm)
Organization: GTECH Corporation, West Greenwich, RI
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 22:06:51 GMT

In article <BxBpzK.G29@matilda.vut.edu.au> jed@matilda.vut.edu.au (Jed Bowtell) writes:
>jmw20@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Joshua Michael Wolf) writes:
>
>>Psylocke: Sharon Stone.  Definitely.
>
>Just one problem. Psylocke has an Asian appearance. The
>body definately fits the bill though. I think Psylocke
>would be one of the hardest to cast.

This would be the role for Tia Carerre. She even has the martial arts for it
(and the bustline).

Topher
-- 
 Christopher A. White                    | 
 caw@gtech.com                           | Free will is largely overrated. 
 GTech Corporation, West Greenwich, RI   | 
 The opinions expressed are mine alone   |           - Topher
Xref: sparky rec.arts.comics:23890 rec.arts.comics.misc:6417
From: andrew@cs.chalmers.se (Andrew Moran)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics,rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Judge Dredd the Movie
Date: 10 Nov 92 16:46:54 GMT
Organization: Dept. of CS, Chalmers, Sweden

Killans - First And Last And Always writes:

>As far as I know, there hasn't been any more news in the last few months.
>The last news I heard came from the pages of 2000AD itself and mentioned
>that Arnie was a possibility for a part in the film, probably as a villain.

Yeah!  Arnie as Mean Machine Angel, it's got to be.

>Mike

Andy
Xref: sparky rec.arts.comics:23893 rec.arts.comics.misc:6475