HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
Subject: Re: Natural Law Party ad
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:46:46 GMT
Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU
Distribution: usa
Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH

mroberts@ptdcs2.intel.com (Mark Roberts ~) writes:

>In article <lfja94INNgas@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> geoffm@purplehaze.Corp.Sun.COM (Semolina Happyface) writes:
>>
>>
>>In article <92308.103710U57567@uicvm.uic.edu> Myself!!!
>> <U57567@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:
>>
>>>>I recall that the NatLaw types are Transcendental Meditator TM
>>>>types from Maharishi U.
>>
>>>SO?   Is that a bad thing?  Is it a good thing?  Does it matter?
>>
>>
>>Well, what do *you* think?  Does a party made up adherents to some 
>>weird-assed, saffron robe-clad, vegetarian, Om-chanting fringe group 
>>hold any credbility with you?  It sure as hell wouldn't for me.  If
>>it doesm then you're not fit to vote in this man's America.
>>
>>
>>Geoff
>
>
>I'm glad I don't live in "this man's America"!!  In the United States of
>America we are given a choice of whom we wish to vote for.  Not every
>body makes informed or even 'good' decisions.  Take a look at all the good
>folks out there that voted for the Republinazis with their right wing
>extreemist christian agenda.  In my opinion they voted incorrectly but
>at least they had a say in the workings of our government.
>
>Don't forget, a lot of people didn't take Mr. Perot seriously either, and
>he managed to get a pretty fair percentage of the popular vote and almost
>threw the election.
>
>I'm glad you live in "this man's America" and not the U.S.A. because a 
>tight-assed pinko like you that would limit anothers rights to run/vote
>as they think best isn't fit to vote in the U.S.A. let alone ...

"Pinko"?  That term is generally applied to someone on the
lefty side of the political spectrum.  I had assumed that Geoff
was from the rightist side of the spectrum, not the left.
-- 
   Brice Dowaliby, Fluent Inc., 10 Cavendish Court, Lebanon, NH  03766
                         bd%fluent@dartmouth.edu        
             I don't speak for them, they don't speak for me
                              DoD # 0698
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
From: bobd@marune.acs.ohio-state.edu (Bob DeBula)
Subject: Re: test
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:05:30 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.162242.20060@bmw.mayo.edu> kaskubar@kirby.mayo.edu (Bruce Kaskubar) writes:
>In article <mjenkins.721417894@cunews> mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca  
>(Michael Jenkinson) writes:
>> test
>
>Just thought I'd try testing a reply posting.  Thank you.


Hmmmm, seems to me things are gettin' mighty testy out here
lately...... :-)

Obligatory Rumor:

I heard "Milly" has already applied as director of EEOC
on an "interspecies equality" basis. Any truth to this
(and any word on George's reaction -- baad dog, it just isn't
prudent thing to do...)?
-- 
==========================================================================
              Disclaimer: These are my views, not the U's

        "If it's in the paper it must be true!" --- D. Doright 
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
From: pld@fc.hp.com (Paul_Dineen)
Subject: Re: CAU$E$ OF WAR$
Organization: HP CLO/CoLL, Fort Collins, CO
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 18:45:10 GMT

mcelwre@cnsvax.uwec.edu wrote:
: 
:           
: 
:                                  CAU$E$ OF WAR$ 
:           
:                Most ALL war$ are ARTIFICIALLY CONTRIVED by 3RD PARTIES 
:           (usually agents of the international banker$, THE MONEY 
:           CHANGER$), for HIDDEN PURPOSES. 
:           
:                In 1980, the CIA paid Saddam Hussein $8 BILLION in GOLD 
:           as a BRIBE to attack Iran, [10-16-80 "WISCONSIN REPORT" (WR), 
:           P.O. Box 45, Brookfield, WI  53005.  Back-issues might still 
:           be available.].  (It was part of the gold which had been 
:           taken out of Fort Knox several years before, IN U.S. ARMY 
:           TRUCKS, under cover of the "London Gold Pool Agreement".  The 
:           transfer was made in a secret underground warehouse in 
:           Zurich.).  BIG OIL [...]

	Please, get help.
From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
Subject: Re: Surgeon General
Date: 12 Nov 92 14:30:05 GMT
Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU
Distribution: usa
Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH

cotera@woods.ulowell.edu writes:

>Is it true that Clinton's Surgeon General is going to be Dr. Jack Kavorkian?

Been listening to your collection of old Rush tapes again, Ray?
-- 
   Brice Dowaliby, Fluent Inc., 10 Cavendish Court, Lebanon, NH  03766
                         bd%fluent@dartmouth.edu        
             I don't speak for them, they don't speak for me
                              DoD # 0698
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
From: cotera@woods.ulowell.edu
Subject: Surgeon General
Organization: University of Lowell
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 17:33:21 GMT

Is it true that Clinton's Surgeon General is going to be Dr. Jack Kavorkian?
--Ray Cote
Newsgroups: talk.rumors,alt.religion.kibology,alt.politics.kibo,alt.slack,alt.postmodern
From: kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry)
Subject: Re: CAU$E$ OF WAR$
Followup-To: alt.postmodern,alt.slack,alt.sex,talk.politics.misc,alt.religion.scientology
Organization: Two rooms filled with typography, in downtown Boston
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 08:07:59 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.190913.2128@cnsvax.uwec.edu> mcelwre@cnsvax.uwec.edu writes:
>...            In 1977, the CIA used MIND-CONTROL techniques to induce 
>          Egyptian President Anwar Sadat to go to Israel for so-called 
>          "peace" talks, which he NEVER would have done otherwise.  (It 
>          was intended to start a Middle East WAR by breaking the 
>          resulting treaty.), [2-2-78 WR].  Similar MIND-CONTROL 
>          techniques have been used to create ASSASSINS, such as John 
>          Chapman (to stop John Lennon from writing more peace music), 
>          [1-29-81 WR], and John Hinckley (a ZIONIST faction in the CIA 
>          preferred the Bush image in place of the Reagon image; the 
>          bullet that hit Reagon did NOT come from Hinckley's gun!), 
>          [4-9-81 WR].  Was MIND-CONTROL used to induce Saddam Hussein 
>          to invade Kuwait, and commit certain related acts and 
>          atrocities?! 

Ladies and gentlemen, what we have here, in technical terms, is a
fruitenlooper.  And who is "Reagon"?  You'd think people who have
conspiracy theories about someone who was president for EIGHT YEARS in
the last decade would learn to spell the six-letter name within those
eight years, hmm?

>               The articles cited above were written by the late Dr. 
>          Peter David Beter, 

You know, this Peter Beter (what would Freud make of a name phonetically
equivalent to "peter beater"?) was probably BUMPED OFF by the DOUBLE
EXTRA SECRET MIND CONTROL HELL NAZI REAGANITE JEWS FROM BEYOND THE
FOURTH DIMENSION!  In fact, they'll probably KILL anyone who reveals
their existence on usenet.  You'd better RUN!  And remember, they can
track you through the computer networks.  Mr. McElwaine, you MUST
IMMEDIATELY go somewhere where there IS NO ACCESS TO USENET!

>               [I KNOW that we are all supposed to LAUGH at the word 
>          "conspiracy".  That is what the various government, military, 
>          political, media, banking, and corporate CONSPIRATORS have 
>          successfully PROGRAMMED most of us to do. ]

And remember, those who don't laugh will be RETIRED... and REFEATHERED!

>               UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this 
>          IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED in BED. 
>
>                                        Robert E. McElwaine
From: rem@public.BTR.COM (Robert E. Maas  rem@btr.com)
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
Subject: Re: Dan Quale to Step in for Bush ?!?!?!?
Date: 5 Nov 92 09:30:52 GMT
Organization: BTR Public Access UNIX, MtnView CA. For info contact: info@BTR.COM

I have been working on a simplified set of puzzles for MacSokoban, and
also for Blockade, which my 2.5 year old son can solve easily without
any supervision. They are of course named after Dan Quayle much like
"Quayle's Tetris" that somebody else did earlier which gave me the
idea. I was hoping to release them a couple months before the election
to sway a few voters against Quayle, but I got bogged down and don't
have them out yet, but fortunately the voters ousted B&Q anyway.

But now with Bush allegedly planning to let Quayle take over for a
while maybe I need to get moving on those games again. If I can release
them and get Quayle to try them, they'll be just right for his mental
level and he'll love them and get addicted to them and refuse to take
over for Bush because he'd rather be playing Sokoban etc.

:-) of course (maybe)
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
Subject: Rush has AIDS?
From: dirk@ecst.csuchico.edu (Dirk Walls)
Date: 13 Nov 1992 06:09:56 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: California State University, Chico
NNTP-Posting-Host: cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu

Will you dittoheads edit your followups so we don't get this Anita Hill thing
on talk.rumors?  It has left the realms of decent rumor mongering and become
something more suitable for talk.politics or alt.flame.bait.

So, has anyone else heard that Ruuuuuuuuush has AIDS? I haven't.
 
-- 
Dirk Walls <> dirk@ecst.csuchico.edu <> wielding a bicycle chain <> PING <>
Newsgroups: talk.rumors,alt.angst.xibo.sex
From: jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (Joel Furr)
Subject: Re: Natural Law Party ad
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 03:22:48 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.215535.22663@ptdcs2.intel.com> mroberts@ptdcs2.intel.com (Mark Roberts ~) writes:
>In article <lfja94INNgas@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> geoffm@purplehaze.Corp.Sun.COM (Semolina Happyface) writes:
>>
>>
>>In article <92308.103710U57567@uicvm.uic.edu> Myself!!!
>> <U57567@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:
>>
>>>>I recall that the NatLaw types are Transcendental Meditator TM
>>>>types from Maharishi U.
>>
>>>SO?   Is that a bad thing?  Is it a good thing?  Does it matter?
>>
>>
>>Well, what do *you* think?  Does a party made up adherents to some 
>>weird-assed, saffron robe-clad, vegetarian, Om-chanting fringe group 
>>hold any credbility with you?  It sure as hell wouldn't for me.  If
>>it doesm then you're not fit to vote in this man's America.
>>
>>
>>Geoff
>
>
>I'm glad I don't live in "this man's America"!!  In the United States of
>America we are given a choice of whom we wish to vote for.  Not every
>body makes informed or even 'good' decisions.  Take a look at all the good
>folks out there that voted for the Republinazis with their right wing
>extreemist christian agenda.  In my opinion they voted incorrectly but
>at least they had a say in the workings of our government.
>
>Don't forget, a lot of people didn't take Mr. Perot seriously either, and
>he managed to get a pretty fair percentage of the popular vote and almost
>threw the election.
>
>I'm glad you live in "this man's America" and not the U.S.A. because a 
>tight-assed pinko like you that would limit anothers rights to run/vote
>as they think best isn't fit to vote in the U.S.A. let alone ...
>
>
>-- Mark


Xibo will be sending letter-bombs to you shortly, Mark. :)
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
From: camidei@Ingres.COM (Chris Amidei)
Subject: Dolly Parton lesbian
Summary: Is Dolly Parton a lesbian?
Organization: Ingres, an ASK Company, Alameda CA 94501
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Distribution: us
Date: 7 Nov 92 01:51:03 GMT

I have a friend who says Dolly Parton is a lesbian.  This friend says she has
a friend who was introduced to Dolly's lover at a party.  Can anyone confirm
this or should this tid-bit be relegated to "urban legend"?

--
The last thing the bungee jumper heard: Gee, I thought I was next?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Amidei	camidei@ingres.com
From: addison@pollux.usc.edu (Richard Addison)
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
Subject: Re: Lucas!
Date: 4 Nov 1992 22:10:02 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: pollux.usc.edu

In <100622@bu.edu> uni@acs.bu.edu (Shaen Bernhardt) writes:
>Just wondering if that rumor that Lucas is going to come out of "retirement"
>and get the Star Wars sequals going was ever confirmed/denied?

I'll make a bold prediction:

  The next film to be released in the Star Wars saga will appear in 1997
  on the 20th anniversary of the first.

-- 
Richard

Newsgroups: talk.rumors
From: mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson)
Subject: test
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 17:51:34 GMT

test

Newsgroups: talk.rumors
From: wung@eecom.gatech.edu (Peter Wung)
Subject: Re: Anita Hill to Head EEOC
Reply-To: wung@eecom.gatech.edu
Organization: School of EE, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 15:43:48 GMT

In article 9606@oracle.us.oracle.com, mfriedma@uucp (Michael Friedman) writes:
>|In article <1dmqvjINNpqq@spool.mu.edu> marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Marc Rassbach) writes:
>|>In article <69.X666X@ramona.com> doug@ramona.com (Double Agent) writes:
>|>>Sunday on _Meet the Press_, Vernon Jordan, head of Clinton's transition
>|>>team, confirmed that Anita Hill is the front-runner to get the job of
>|>>EEOC Commissioner. Note that the EEOC is the agency where Hill was working
>|>>when she was sexually harassed by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas,
>|>>who was then the EEOC Commissioner. Put on your goggles, folks, the fire-
>|>>works should be dazzling.
>|
>|>Revenge is a dish best served cold.
>|
>|I totally agree.
>|
>|For example, the Republicans in the Senate may choose to explore the
>|rumors that Hill returned papers to her students with pubic hairs
>|inside of them.  (Yes!!  I am not making this up!  There have been
>|such claims by some of her former students.)
>|
>|>The coldest cut:  After a stint at EEOC, Hill is appointed to the
>|>Court.
>|
>|The amusing thing about this is that it is coming from people who
>|claimed that Thomas wasn't qualified.  Would someone out there please
>|explain to us why Hill is even remotely qualified for either the EEOC
>|or the Court postion?

She couldn't be any less qualified than Thomas for the Supreme Court, plus she has 
the experience of being harassed for the EEOC post.

>|-- 
>|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>|I am not an official Oracle spokesman.  I speak for myself and no one else.



---
********************************************************************
*Peter Wung			Email:wung@ee.gatech.edu	   * 
*Electric Power Laboratory	Snail mail: 33787 Ga. Tech Station * 
*School of Electrical Engineering	    Atlanta, GA 30332      *
*Georgia Institute of Technology			    	   *
*Atlanta, Georgia						   *
*   	"Pass, Set, CRUSH!"...					   * 
*  	Well, 2 out of 3 ain't bad for a short, fat guy. 	   *
*								   *
********************************************************************
From: sjhsys@sjh.org
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
Subject: test
Date: 8 Nov 92 05:23:22 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: St. Joseph Hospital, Cheektowaga, N.Y.

test
From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
Newsgroups: talk.rumors
Subject: Re: flag burnin'
Date: 7 Nov 92 14:58:11 GMT
Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU
Distribution: usa
Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH

rey@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Troy Lovata) writes:

>	I don't suppose it would make much of a difference now, but heard
>from college Dems and Republicans at the University of Wisc-Madison that
>Bush was going to release a tape of of Clinton burning a US flag in the '60's
>the day before the election. Is this a misunderstanding of some affidavidt
>I heard only fleetingly about on CNN?

Must be a mis-hearing.  If Bush had it, he would have used it.
-- 
   Brice Dowaliby, Fluent Inc., 10 Cavendish Court, Lebanon, NH  03766
                         bd%fluent@dartmouth.edu        
             I don't speak for them, they don't speak for me
                              DoD # 0698
From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Sorry, Scott, but I think Nyikos had a lobotomy
Date: 11 Nov 92 00:29:29 GMT
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon

In article <nyikos.721424594@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
[text deleted, before and after]
#Let me jump in here before you set the sarcasm to "off":
#
#Adrienne: "Peter, get your attributions right.  I did not say the above.
#Will did."
#
##/* set sarcasm off */


Is there a word for someone this stupid?  

Susan
Xref: sparky talk.abortion:46835 alt.abortion.inequity:4873 soc.men:18725 alt.dads-rights:2557
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 01:56:43 EST
From: <DAB112@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity,soc.men,alt.dads-rights
Subject: Re: Let's Play StipU (1)
 <Bx8vup.5tH@cs.psu.edu> <1dbgs0INN5gh@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>

All right, I think I've read enough to know what's going on here.  I only
wish I caught the beginning of all this.  Now, instead of sifting through
all of the "In article.... he says...she says..." trivialities, why don't
we start from scratch again?  It makes for easy reading.

I'll begin.  Now, Don, you replied to a statement made by Adrienne, I
believe, (funny she is posting to **dad's** rights, don't you think?)
that fathers are positively fawned upon when they show fatherliness, or
however she put it, correct?  You said that it was definitely a DOWNSIDE.
The question is, why is going to PTA meetings, taking your children for a
walk, etc. a downside?  I already know I misinterpreted something, but
asking is the best way for finding out something.

And to Adrienne... what would give you reason to say something like that??
Parenting isn't something where each parent is against the other, trying to
collect the most points.  That was the way it sounded when you made that
statement -- that it was a hit below the belt for YOU because it's good that
fathers are doing wonderful things for AND WITH their children.

And the last I read somebody was being called foolish, so it's "then" that
I decide to hang it up.

                                 David.
==============================================================================
  || Disclaimer:  I have no disclaimer, and you can yell at  me all you  ||
  ||              want, because I'm half deaf anyway and I won't listen  ||
  ||              to you.... except if you're nice.                      ||
==============================================================================
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.religion.misc,alt.atheism,alt.religion.computers
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Good Answer....
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 21:04:13 GMT

ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
] drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes ...
] >Ok, all you have to do is write a multithreaded kernel
] >using object oriented cobol for the 8088 family of chips
] >to be used as a Multitasking Multiuser 
] >DOS Machine.....
] 
] 
] 'tisn't THAT hard.  All you have to do is implement a Turing machine
] in Cobol, then implement the SPARC architecture in the Turing machine,
] port over SunOS, and viola!

Now for extra credit, can you please implement
a GodelianString Semantical Analyser in fortran.

You should limit half of the GodelianString Syntactical
Parser to AppleSmallTalk, the Other half in ObjectiveAda.

Remember that the Stack will need to be able to
contain Infinite + 2 elements, you can used
structured basic.

ciao
drieux


ps: what was that about 'doable' projects
as a sub_text for defining 'When Hell Freezes Over!'
for those who Fail To Be TrueBelieversOfTheOneTrueReligion[tm].


-- 
Modern Day Problems:

Hickory, Dickory, Dock - Three Mice Ran up a Clock
The Clock Struct one, and the Other Two Called for Air Support.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: ATUI: In Retrospect (Take 2)
From: mcbeanb@brandonu.ca
Date: 8 Nov 92 12:53:40 CST
Organization: Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada

Sorry about my first attempt to post this last night, but BU did
that funky "shut-down for no apparent reason" trick last night
while the newsreader was accepting my post.  Could my problems
have anything to do with the pro-life perspective postings I was
making at the time??  

Date: 8 Nov 92 00:09:40 CST

Well, retyping the whole position paper again has definitely revealed
a number of questions I need to answer.  I also found out I use the
words "deemed" and "simply" far too often!  Quite a few inconsistencies
and inflammatory passages in there, but I think with a little work
they could be considered acceptable.  Flame or comment away (I may
even opt to flame myself for a few statements).  Keep in mind I
wrote this to positively convey my own postion, not as a regular
essay in which all the sides are considered without too much bias.
If you think the whole thing is a waste of time and bandwidth, too
bad for you (and I have lots of time now that I'm unemployed and 
awaiting a visa to get to Texas!).

Brian McBean  -  McBeanB@BrandonU.Ca
From: bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com (J H Woodyatt)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Saying of Rabbi Abe
Date: 5 Nov 92 07:09:13 GMT
Reply-To: bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com
Organization: Abiogenesis 4 Less

bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw) writes:
# jk@panix.com (Jim Kalb) writes:
# >bc744@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark Ira Kaufman) writes:
# 
# >>   "One can be a racist.  Or one can be a human being.  But one
# >>may not be both."
# >>                                 - Rabbi Abraham Joshua heschel
# 
# >What's he talking about?  "One can be <a person with outlook X>.  Or
# >one can be a human being.  But one may not be both."  Does that mean
# >that people supporting outlook X should not be allowed to vote?  That
# >they can be shot down like dogs in the street?  It seems to me that
# >Rabbi heschel has some serious thinking to do.
# 
# Is it so difficult to believe that some of us believe racists to
# be sub-human at best?

``...and I know there are some people who do not love their fellow
man, and I HATE PEOPLE LIKE THAT!''
			-- Tom Lehrer, `National Brotherhood Week'

I prefer to think that the rabbi was speaking figuratively, not
literally -- and did not really mean to imply that racists are animals
that can be slaughtered for overbreeding.  I don't want to speculate
on why Mr. Kaufman finds the quote so appealing.

Can we get back to the abortion rights street fight now?


-- 
+---------------------------+  ``But I think that until MAGOG can get
| J H Woodyatt              |  some solid Financing, and an exchangeable
| bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com |  currency, we can postpone the second
+---------------------------+  coming for a while.''
                                                  -- drieux, just drieux