From: f43703a@nucc.cc.nagoya-u.ac.jp (SUPRATIC GUPTA)
Subject: Re: Mustafa & reply to SAMIT (same topic)
Organization: Nagoya University Computation Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 02:14:47 GMT


rticle: 5871 of soc.culture.indian
From: crick@tsp.med.umn.edu (Ed Crick (CD))
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian
Subject: Re: Mustafa

In article <1992Dec26.072438.18248@nucc.cc.nagoya-u.ac.jp> f43703a@nucc.cc.nago\
ya-u.ac.jp (SUPRATIC GUPTA) writes:
>I really felt that he has real power. He started
>a real good topic. Difference between man and animal.
>
>bad words. I wish I complain to all your ADMINS.
>
>SUPRATIC GUPTA

Ahh, once again the cry for censorship rises from SCI like a foul stench from
an open latrine.  This time SUPRATIC GUPTA (note the arrogance of the sig)

GUPTA> I don't no what to write in the sig file. So I just wrote "with
regards   SUPRATIC GUPTA. Actually I don't have any idea. I am not as
inteligent as you. Can you give me some idea please.

joins the other insanitary ones, Aayush Asthana and Lakinder Walia in releasing
this putrid miasma, causing us all to hold our breaths.

GUPTA> Since you group me with few other, can you introdue me to them.
I really am new in the net. I will really thank you for that.


Perhaps you should all change your diets to include "n" so that you can skip
the article that violates your virgin eyes.  "n" can also mean "no," in that
when uttered the "offender" will stop, and on the net you do have the control
to evade this abuse.  Those who post freely under the bill of rights are not
raping the sensitivities of Victorian nannies like yourself.  If you persist
in reading articles which traumatize your fragile emotions, then you bring
such misfortune on yourself, and, like any other irresponsible schoolboy, you
try to find a scapegoat for your self-abusive actions.

To refer to the original post, "the difference between man and animal," man
can analyze a situation and make an intelligent decision as to his actions.
Man can also accept the responsibility for his actions.  Can you do this
SUPRATIC GUPTA, or must you blame others for you nescience.  Are you a man or
a meek household pet?

GUPTA> You are repeating the same words that I wrote. I being in Japan,
having the advantage of time over you, was the first to answer the mail.
I exactly said those words. I just wanted to say is does that mustafa
deserve such treatment just for that one statement. I have always in
my life taken responsibility of every thing I do. I never eveen say
"OH! GOD HELP ME."


Ed Crick

Dear Crick,
   I have nothing against you personally. I believe that what you
wrote was really what you meant to say. I was also sincere in what
I said.

All the best.


;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Article: 5876 of soc.culture.indian
From: banerjee@hsc.usc.edu (Samit Banerjee)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian
Subject: Aayush Asthana, Lakhinder Walia and now Gupta (was Re: Mustafa)

In article <1992Dec27.203845.19524@news2.cis.umn.edu> crick@tsp.med.umn.edu (Ed\
 Crick (CD)) writes:

GUPTA> Samit, You are Real fast. You really kept your promise to meet
me in the net.  You are really welcome.

>Ahh, once again the cry for censorship rises from SCI like a foul stench from
>an open latrine.  This time SUPRATIC GUPTA (note the arrogance of the sig)
>joins the other insanitary ones, Aayush Asthana and Lakinder Walia in
>releasing this putrid miasma, causing us all to hold our breaths.

Supratic Gupta joins the indolent, egotistical, pussy footing, cross
dressing, transvestite coverting club of Aayush Asthana and Lakhinder
Walia.  Their puerile, inane arguments in favor of censorship on SCI

GUPTA> I wish I was as good as you in English. But in logic I can tackle
you. But sorry, I have a very bad english. I applied to Japan not
US because I didnot have to write TOFEL. But you use great words.
I had to consult the DIC.

and their absolute ignorance about the nuances of networking or the
freeedom of expression, born largely out of shared experiences during
an abused childhood  gives rise to persistent questions about their
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  GUPTA> Who has abused childhood? Mental 
capablity(I see). 

mental capabilities.

>Those who post freely under the bill of rights are not
>raping the sensitivities of Victorian nannies like yourself.  If you persist
>in reading articles which traumatize your fragile emotions, then you bring
>such misfortune on yourself, and, like any other irresponsible schoolboy, you
>try to find a scapegoat for your self-abusive actions.

These self styled lieutenants of the net-police who emerge at specific,

GUPTA> Really, do they surface as frequently as that of the emergance
GUPTA> Really, do they surface as frequently as that of the emergance
of Foul language in SCI in Highest intensity. It speaks for itself.
May be we have to learn to leave with people like you and press "n".
I don't want to add you to my kill file because even when you fuck
me, I can learn some thing. If not any thing , then English. More
over your debates are interesting too.

intervals to voice their concerns about violations of USENET priviledges

GUPTA> use of Bad language is not violation of USENET, but we have
the minimum courtesy (Bhadrata). 

seem to slither away into their crummy holes once the plethora of posts
on such benign aspects of our culture such as "looking for", "matrimonial",
"where to buy CD's", "wether to take a multisystem VCR to India" appear
with irksome consistency on the net. I suppose these champions of free

GUPTA> These don't have bad words in it. FAQ serves that purpose. But
Any net work faces that prblem because new comers like me don't know all
rules.

speech would have us believe that it is better to enquire about an H-1
visa for the nth time and not extend the same courtesy to the state of
the contents of Mustafa Ibrahim's cranial cavity.

GUPTA> I agree to it. But you forgot that one can even be fucked with
sweet words. Sweet words: bad words  == pen: sword.


These computer illiterate, insolent hypocrites without a trace of literary
GUPTA>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        corect                really (why am I a hypocrite?)
pretensions or intellectual creativity to post an article, need
GUPTA>         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  (that depennds on your interest
what you call as intelect. I am also an IIT Graduate, may be the worst
of the lot.)

to be reminded at frequent intervals that any individual's ability or
priviledge to post to the net is not dependant on their patronage, much
less their concurrance.  And while the futility of their actions seems
obvious, it does set a dangerous precedent on SCI providing an impetus
for copy-cat whistle blower's to give vent to their vested interests. Any
fallout from such actions cannot be easily discounted or wished away.

GUPTA> I have no coments. You are really great in English. I will
not compit with you in it. Scilence will be my reply. But read you artile
when you are in cool mind.

Samit



--
Samit Banerjee,                     |
University of Southern California   |  A man who smiles when things go wrong,
Internet: banerjee@scf.usc.edu      |  has found somebody to blame it on.
Bellnet : (213) 342-1401            |

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

I Don't know how to get the preevious letter into > mode.

Sorry for the inconvinience. My coments start with GUPTA>
If I am not able to answer you always, don't think that I
am afraid. I am just little busy.

All the best Samit.


-- 
With regards
 
SUPRATIC GUPTA