HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: chey@novell.com (Cindy Hey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Troi is capable of wearing a uniform (SPOILERS)
Date: 30 Dec 92 22:25:37 GMT
Organization: Novell Inc., San Jose, Califonia

In article <BzqqIA.BD4@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens) writes:
>Eric Williams writes
>> Regarding her choice of uniform: Has everyone forgotten her
>> Betazoid/zed background? Marriages take place in the buff.
>
>However marriage ceremonies aren't the topic of discussion in this  
>thread and concentration on marriage ceremonies is neither Picard's nor  
>Troi's jobs.  Exactly how does simply being part Betazoid allow one to  
>not have to follow the dress code that every other bridge crew member,  
>senior officer and Lt. Commander have to obey?  

Every other crew member?  Huh?

Is Worf obeying the dress code when he wears his Klingon sash?  Is Ro when
she is allowed to wear her Bajoran earing?  (I seem to recall that in the
first episode she was in, she was told by Riker (?) to remove it as it was
not regulation.  Later, Picard (?) told her that she could continue to wear
it.  Or something like that.  Does anyone remember this?)  Anyway, maybe
it's the same for Troi.  Maybe her body suit outfit is typical for Betazoids
and is considered native wear and is therefore allowed by Picard (even
though it is not regulation).

Just a thought ...
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ryonkers@mis.mi04.zds.com (Russell Yonkers)
Subject: Re: Comments CoC I: Enterprise Crew are Whiners
Organization: Zenith Data Systems
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 21:01:28 GMT


There are times that commanders in military command have to be able to just give orders and have them followed.  Jellico was not required and didn't have the time to spoonfeed all the crew.  They were very much out of line and wimpy about the whole thing.  It was about time  they woke up and smelled the roses!
From: matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Beverly heats up... *POSSIBLE SPOILERS*
Date: 22 Dec 92 22:51:47 GMT
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder

In article <85290021@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>, boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell) writes:
> Gag.  I'll take worf's mate anytime.  If I had to choose a regular then I'd
> be forced to take Troi...might even teach her a new way to eat chocolate.
                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Geez!  Talk about gagging....

Kellie M-S
matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu
From: dascoser@cybernet.cse.fau.edu (david serchay)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Saturday Night Review - "Chain of Command Part II" SPOILERS!
Date: 29 Dec 92 06:49:34 GMT
Organization: Cybernet BBS, Boca Raton, Florida

ph9991_manfr@rivers.acc.uwrf.edu writes:

> And now, not at all live, from Ellsworth and River Falls, Wisconsin,
> it's the Saturday Night Review!!!
> 
> 
> SPOILERS ahead for "Chain of Command Part II"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> SPOILERS!  -Do not cross the Cardassian border
> 
> 
> 
> Script(Dialog and Scenes alone): Average.  Good points were Gul Madred's
> 	showing-off of Picard to his daugher, bad points were the constant
> 	and very pointless use and reuse of the "four, five, SIX" lights
> 	time after time.  As I said before, none of the techniques we saw
> 	had any science fiction bend to them whatsoever, thus I consider
> 	them below average for a science fiction series.
Ever read 1984? 2+2=5. If you can someone to say that he sees something 
he doesn't then you have him. If Picard had said 5 lights, then Madred
would have had him.

Dascoser
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: beezer@cc.utah.edu (BEEZER)
Subject: [QUESTION]:  PARAMOUNT'S VIDEOTAPE OF 'ENCOUNTER @ FAR POINT'
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Organization: Salt Lick, UT
Date: 21 Dec 1992 02:31 MST  

_____________________________________________________________________

My roomie says that when the first started TNG with Encounter @
Far Point...  that it was an 'unarranged' 2-hr premier, but when
they showed it again - not only had they split the 2-hr show into
seperate nights...  But that they rearranged/exchanged certains
scenes between the two seperate hours to make more 'sense'...

The video tape in the store gives conflicting information.  It
says that it's the 'orignal 2-hr premier', but then goes on to
say 'in both parts' and the stardate given is the beginning of
the seperate second hour...

---

So, if your savvy as to if this video is the 'true premeir', please
drop us a bit of email.  Most appreciated.
_____________________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: chip@tct.com (Chip Salzenberg)
Subject: Re: Chain Of Command Part II -- review
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 00:26:08 GMT
Organization: TC Telemanagement, Clearwater, FL

SRELIOPS <-> SPOILERS

According to tob@world.std.com (Tom O Breton):
>The implant device likewise simplified the explanatory stuff.  Hope JLP
>has since had it removed. Otherwise --- "Leiutenant Worf, open hailing
>frequencies --- ARGHH! AAAAHHH! AOOOOOOO! Close them!!!!"

Wouldn't the Cardassians remove it?  Why leave unnecessary evidence
of their having tortured him?
-- 
Chip Salzenberg at Teltronics/TCT  <chip@tct.com>, <73717.366@compuserve.com>
  "you make me want to break the laws of time and space / you make me
   want to eat pork / you make me want to staple bagels to my face /
   and remove them with a pitchfork" -- Weird Al Yankovic, "You Make Me"
From: brad@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Brad Barton)
Subject: Re: Uniform Colors in TNG
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 14:26:01 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <1992Dec31.062116.26204@vdoe386.vak12ed.edu> msmallwo@vdoe386.vak12ed.edu (M. Lee Smallwood) writes:
>How about this?
>
>BLUE -- Medicine, Science. These people are not line officers.
>
>RED -- Command, navigation. These people ARE line officers.
>
>GOLD -- Technology, security, operations. These people ARE line
>        officers. Science line officers (like DATA???) also go
>        here. 
>
>Deep Space Nine throws this all off (y'know the doctor wearing
>green and whatever the first officer wears), but the uniform
>rules (I guess) are QUITE different for space stations.
>Actually, I like the green uniform, and wish they'd change the
>Enterprise's blue uniforms over to green...
>
Just saw the Deep Space Nine premier last night (wunnerful, wunnerful) and
Dr Bashir's uniform looked blue... could just be me.  Major Kira wears what
she does because she is not a Federation officer, she is a Bajoran officer
assigned to be Sisko's second in command aboard the station (which she does
superbly, I might add.. a strong female character should satisfy many of
the people around here).


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Brad Barton - brad@cmptrc.lonestar.org  |  "Light the lamp, not the rat!"  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: N2SX000 <N2SX@UNB.CA>
Subject: RE: Uniforms and their colors
Organization: The University of New Brunswick
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 01:45:55 GMT

In article <42mr7+h@lynx.unm.edu> greywolf@draco.unm.edu (Michael H. Tipping) writes:
>   If uniform color is set to a department (as in the old series), then
>why did Data use a blue uniform in Chain of Command II?  I always thought
>that he wore a yellow one.  Also, why would command move from the gold
Blue?  Have your TV looked at! :):)  It was red, same as Riker's.
>in TOS, to standardized maroon (the movies - for all officers at least),
The NCO's wore red uniforms as well.  If you look carefully, though,
you might notice that the strap on the right shoulder is colour-coded.
>to red (which used to be security "target" colors?  I would have thought
>that the movie type would stay in for quite some time (they really looked
It looks as if they did.  The crew of the Enterprise C wore similar
uniforms.  That means they were around for about 60 years.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: wwadge@csr.UVic.CA (Bill  Wadge)
Subject: Re: Picard's garbled dialogue (was Re: Lynch's Review of CoC2)
Organization: University of Victoria
Date: 28 Dec 92 00:13:41 GMT

aa317@Freenet.carleton.ca (Mike Porter) writes:


>In a previous article, bw462@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bucky Whaley) says:

>>In a previous article, rfd@po.CWRU.Edu (Richard F. Drushel) says:
>>>In a previous article, tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch) says:
>>
>>...
>>>>--Could someone with a closed-captioning decoder please let me know what 
>>>>Picard's final lines are after "You cannot hurt me!"  I've gone over it 
>>>>several times, but damned if I can make it out...
>>...
>>>	Sur la pont
>>>	D'Avignon
>>>	Loni danse, loni danse
>>
>>        L'on y danse, l'on y danse

>Close... it's "on y danse, on y danse"--no  l's.  (Now its my turn to get
>corrected!)
>-- 

Actually, it *is*   "L'on y danse, l'on y danse" because it is an old
song in old French.  Nowadays, one would say "On y danse".

"(L')on y danse" means, literally, "One danses there" but a more idiomatic
rendering would be "that's where we danse" or "people danse there".

Bill Wadge

--- the empty .sig ---

>Cheers, Mike
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: msmallwo@vdoe386.vak12ed.edu (M. Lee Smallwood)
Subject: Re: do we need rec.arts.startrek.dsn?
Organization: Virginia's Public Education Network (Richmond)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 18:45:52 GMT

What do we do about B5 when it comes out. Most of the B5 stuff
I've read on the newsgroups has been in the ras newsgroups? Are
*we* going to treat it Star Trek even though it isn't Star
Trek? Remember, we're treating DSN as Star Trek when it isn't
(technically) Star Trek. It's just made by the Star Trek people
and ties into the Star Trek Universe. *We* are the ones who are
going to want to compare it to DSN, and to talk about it,
anyway. Because of this problem (and the DSN problem), I
propose this:

New Groups:
TNG: current
TNG: misc
TNG: info
TNG: fandom

TOS: movies
TOS: series
TOS: books

DSN: current
DSN: misc
DSN: info
DSN: fandom

B5: current
B5: misc
B5: info
B5: fandom

Crossovers: TNG and DSN
Comparisons: DSN and B5
Parodies: ST and B5

Of course, we should wait to see if TNG and B5 are sucessful
before we *make* this system...
---
Lee Smallwood	msmallwo@vdoe386.vak12ed.edu	Tazewell HS
I got me a pocket full of kryptonite...
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: trogers@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Saturday Night Review - "Chain of Command Part II" SPOILERS!
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 14:28:05 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.16 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: trogers@yktvmv.vnet.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In <1992Dec26.200351.520@rivers> ph9991_manfr@rivers.acc.uwrf.edu writes:
>And now, not at all live, from Ellsworth and River Falls, Wisconsin,
>it's the Saturday Night Review!!!

Nice review - NOT.  I ask, what do you want every week? - A Best of Both Worlds
part I filled with new nifty, sci-fi, techno-crap and babble?  I found
CoC1&2 very entertaining.  The two main conflicts were well written and
very thought provoking.  Shoot-em up episodes filled with techno-dweeb
stuff just for the sake of it get real old, real quick.  I enjoy such things
just as much as the next guy, but every once in a while STNG needs an episode
that deals with humanity, and real human issues.

As far as two-part episodes go, I place this one after BoBW and Redemption,
but well ahead of Unification and Time's Arrow.

I look at your posts to be the defacto review for the episodes.  Please
try to collect a more broad-minded reviewing panel in the future.

Regards,
Tom Rogers
roy@trigger.watson.ibm.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Disclaimer:  The comments in this post  | - What is your name?     |
|              are not necessarily shared | - What is your quest?    |
|              with my employer           | - What is...             |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: dlileiki@AFIT.AF.MIL (Dennis E. Lileikis)
Subject: Re: Chain of Command Part I (*SPOILERS!*)
Summary: CoC P1 Not that Great
Keywords: CoC
Organization: Air Force Institue of Technology, WPAFB OH
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 16:12:43 GMT

In article <7148@ucsbcsl.ucsb.edu> wesc@ucsb.edu ((Wesley J. Chun)) writes:
>From: wesc@ucsb.edu ((Wesley J. Chun))
>Subject: Chain of Command Part I (*SPOILERS!*)
>Date: 15 Dec 92 11:59:32 GMT

>This episode was pretty good in my opinion. 

I have to disagree.  I absolutely love ST:TNG, but I'm afraid this was just 
a so-so episode.  Perhaps the hype had made my expectations way too high.

>The only question I have is:  Why Picard/Crusher/Worf team and not
>some young Starfleet commando team (with appropriate backgrounds)?

Exactly the reason I don't think this was a very good episode.  Major flaw 
in logic if you ask me.  Surely there are people still around of lower rank 
who served with Piccard on the Stargazer familiar with those waves (I forgot 
the name) they were detecting. I'm sure any reasonably knowledgeable 
engineer could bone-up on them and accomplish the mission.  Since Warf has 
muffed every battle he's been in he is absolutely the wrong choice, as is 
the heretofore whimpy Dr. Crusher.  

Question:  Did Beverley sleep with the Ferengi captain in payment for their 
passage to the Cardassian planet, as she implied she would?

Question:  What would the Cardassians want with Piccard that they would come 
up with such an improbable scheme for capturing him?  Surely a politico in 
the Federation would be more valuable both information-wise and hostage-wise 
to the Cardassians than a mere starship captain.

I can only hope Part 2 is better than Part 1.  Flame away!

Dennis Lileikis
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: jnlong@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Jeffrey N Long)
Subject: Re: The Borg
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 20:52:42 GMT

In article <71833@cup.portal.com> Peter_A_David@cup.portal.com writes:
>I was lukewarm on them at first, but really got into them as I was writing
>"Vendetta."  I thought they were a kick...although I was not enthused about
>the latest entry in the Borg saga, "I Borg," which has been rightly nicknamed
>"Edward Scissorborg."
>
>PAD

Hey! I loved your book.  It is by far my favorite TNG novell.

Jlong
tOSU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: rwmech@uumeme.chi.il.us (Robert W. Mech)
Subject: Re: Data Watch
Organization: UUMEME Public Access Xenix
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 22:18:59 GMT

In article <1992Dec26.210829.1154@mala.bc.ca> dunae@mala.bc.ca writes:
>In Chain of Command part II, Data was wearing a red uniform.
>He was also in Riker's chair on the bridge. 

Thats because, he was field promoted to first officer.  They didnt
come right out and say it, but he was wearing the red uniform, and
he also had the increased rank on his collar.

>How come Dr.
>Crusher, Data, Geordi, or Dianna never sit in the command chair?
>They're all the same rank as Riker.   And they also take orders
>from him, maybe it's because of his uniform colour, or maybe
>because he's Picard's right hand man?

They are NOT all the same rank.  They are all officers, and heads of
staff, but they are not all the same rank.  Also, what purpose would
any of them have to sit in the chair?  Also, data has sat in the 
captains chair on nurmous occasions, as he sometimes takes command
for the "off hours".

You should watch a little more STTNG, or mebbe read a few books, this
is quite basic stuff.

-- 
:*: rwmech@uumeme.chi.il.us | Owner/Adminstrator UUMEME Public Access Xenix :*:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Jesus saves sinners... and redeems them for valuable cash prizes!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder)
Subject: Re: Where was Jellico?
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 13:38:41 GMT

In article <1992Dec29.194613.19240@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca> cs921018@ariel.yorku.ca (NELSON A REATEGUI) writes:
>
>  After watching Chain Of Command, I was discussing the episode with
>a friend when he posed an interesting question:
> 
>  Where was Jellico  during the Battle with the Borg (BoBW)??!
>  Where was the Cairo???(sp?)???
> 
>Hmmmm...
> 
>Nelson.


Gee, could it be because the character hadn't been _invented_ yet?

Hmmmmm... could be.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Schroeder  		|  If this .sig causes dizziness or  
schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov         |  vertigo, dicontinue use and consult    
Brookhaven National Laboratory  |  your physician. 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: bbs-hrick@jwt.UUCP (Rick Harrison)
Subject: DS9 review & synopsis (SPOILERS)
Reply-To: bbs-hrick@jwt.UUCP
Organization: The Matrix
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 14:45:06 GMT

I went to a local TV station where a friend works Wednesday night
to watch the DS9 premiere via their giant satellite dish and
50-inch monitor screen.
 
Here's how I'd grade the show:
story line: A
acting & directing: B
special effects: A
music: F
 
There were about ten people in the room, we all pretty much agreed
on the above assessment.  The theme music and incidental music
were extremely lame; everything else was between okey-dokey and
excellent.
 
SPOILERS BELOW (altho I don't give away the ending)
*
*
*
*
*
synopsis: Commander Sisko is assigned to DS9 which orbits Bejor (sp?).
He is a single parent raising his son alone; his wife was killed by
the Borg at Wolf 359.  After arriving on the station and looking around,
he has a meeting with Picard which reminds them both of the awful
Locutus days.  The Cardassians have just withdrawn from Bejor after
robbing the Bejorans of all their valuable resources, or so they
think.  Sisko goes down to the planet and meets the Bejoran spiritual
leader, named Kai Opaka or some such.  She shows him a mysterious
device, one of several which appeared in Bejoran skies over the
course of many centuries.  She tells Sisko it is his destiny to
find "the celestial temple" before the Cardassians do.  He asks her
what she's talking about, but rather than explaining, she gives
him the mysterious device and sends him on his way.
 
After further research, Sisko and his pal Dax (a member of the
symbiotic Trill species) discover that something odd must be
going on in a nearby section of space.  There is a cardassian
ship at the space station, so a crew-mate of Sisko's sneaks onto
the cardassian ship to disable its sensors so that Sisko can
take a small scout ship into that part of space.  They discover
a very unusual wormhole leading to the gamma quadrant.  Before
long, a Cardassian ship discovers it too, but gets trapped on the
other side.
 
Three angry Cardassian warships come to DS9 wanting to know what
happened to the other ship.  Sisko is trapped in the wormhole
while mysterious life-forms attempt to communicate with him, and
consider destroying him.  The Cardassians attack the nearly
defenseless space station.  Drama!  Excitement!  Will they survive?
Tune in and find out.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.movies
From: billones@grebyn.com (Jeremy Billones)
Subject: Re: CoCII and _Closet Land_
Followups-To: rec.arts.movies
Organization: Grebyn Timesharing
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 21:19:47 GMT

(I hope I got that follow-up line right; our version of nn won't add
it automatically.)

rob@tlon.mit.edu (Rob Sanner) writes:
>Those who really enjoyed the Warner/Stewart confrontation
>aspect of [the Star Trek Episode "Chain of Command," part II]
>might also enjoy the movie _Closet Land_
>with Alan Rickman and Madeline Stowe--just the two of them
>locked for two hours in a similar, but more intensely
>horrifying, test of wills and physical endurance.

I agree... but turn off the tape before the last five minutes.  The end
really falls flat on its face.

Jeremy Billones				billones@grebyn.com
"We don't do it for the glory.  We don't do it for the recognition.  We do
it because it needs to be done.  Because if we don't, no one else will.  And
we do it even if no one knows what we've done.  Even if no one knows we exist.
Even if no one knows we ever existed."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: 2020211@SAPHIR.ULAVAL.CA (Sylvain Chamberland)
Subject: Re: Picard's garbled dialogue (was Re: Lynch's Review of CoC2)
Reply-To: 2020211@SAPHIR.ULAVAL.CA
Organization: CTI, Universite Laval
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 07:55:00 GMT

In article <1hkk3oINN129@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, bw462@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bucky Whaley) writes:
>>	Sur la pont
>>	D'Avignon
>>	Loni danse, loni danse
>
>        L'on y danse, l'on y danse

Of course!!!!

In my previous post, I typed the English spelling for "dance". It should be as
it was written in the original post...

Mea culpa...   :(

>bw462@cleveland.freenet.edu            "It's funny because it's true."
>                                       - Fat Tony, `Bart the Murderer'

Sylvain Chamberland
2020211@saphir.ulaval.ca
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.current:21145 rec.arts.startrek.misc:13008
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Show Us the Enterprise-B and E!
From: ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 15:10:53 PST
Organization: Paradox Alley F&SF BBS 805-492-8789

lape@cs.utk.edu (Bryon S. Lape) writes:

> In article <tomcat.724217665@cwis> tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu (Jeffrey S. Jo) wr
> >cmeadows@nyx.cs.du.edu (Chris Meadows) writes:
> >
> >
> >	contracts for each cast member.  In any case, Richard Arnold
> >	had stated that some of the cast members may re-new, but
> >	Stewart is not one of them..as well as Spiner and Dorn.
> 	^^^^^^^
> 
> 	When asked by Letterman whether there would be any movies, Stewart
> said that he hoped so.
> 

I may be totally wrong here, but wasn't Richard Arnold sacked?  As in 
soon after Roddenberry's death both Richard Arnold and Susan Sackett
found themselves out of a job.   If this is true, then what would
RA know about who was renewed and who wasn't? 


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Catherine Beckstead                    ace@kryton.uucp
"Do you want to argue with a can of deodorant that registers
NINE on the Richter scale?"        --Ace, in "Dragonfire"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: joer@inca.law.csuohio.edu (Joe Rosenfeld)
Subject: Re: Worf *sigh*
Organization: CSU Law Library, Automation Dept.
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 20:28:23 GMT

In article <1992Dec21.162330.16644@zip.eecs.umich.edu> charles@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Charles Jacob Cohen) writes:
>From: charles@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Charles Jacob Cohen)
>Subject: Worf *sigh*
>Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 16:23:30 GMT


>Worf used to be one of my favorite characters, and at times he still is,
>but.....

>chain of command spoilers:

>

>Bats.  He is afraid of bats.  Fine, I can understand.  But this is Worf.
>*WORF*  He is a Klingon warrior.  If he didn't get shot by Ferrengi, if
>every alien didn't beat him up, if Guinan couldn't shoot better than him, 
>if....then it would have been cute, even funny.  But the bat thing just
>adds insult to injury.

>At least he beat up the Cardassian during the raid, and he told a phaser hit
>square on and was still able to move. - Chuck


>-- 
>"I do not feel obliged to believe that same God who endowed us with sense,
>reason, and intellect, had intended for us to forgo their use." - Galileo
>"I'm an engineer, not a dictionary!" - Me

Well, Chuck.  The phaser was set on "1."  Worf should have fired at the 
stunned guard before he could fire back, and Worf is also afraid of mice, 
women, everything!  He is a caricature of his former self, the one who 
wanted to blast a hole in the Viewer (!) in _Incident at Farpoint_.

Go Romulans!

Cowboy

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joe Rosenfeld
joer@inca.law.csuohio.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current