HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: epg@gateway.mitre.org ("Ella P. Gardner")
Subject: Re: Compulsory address fields
Full-Name: Ella P. Gardner
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Date: 22 Dec 92 13:59:38 GMT

At the OIW last week, a change notice to FIPS 146-1 was distributed.  One
change is as follows:

This sentence in Section 5.3.2 of FIPS 146-1 is deleted: "The
attributes which must be supported by all implementations are
the country name, the administration name, private domain
name, organization name, organizational units, and personal
name."  The following sentence is substituted: "The
attributes which must be capable to be generated by all
implementations are the country name, administration name,
private domain name, organization name, organizational unit,
personal name and a list of domain-defined attributes."

Ella Gardner
MITRE
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: worsley@koel.mel.dit.CSIRO.AU (Andrew Worsley)
Subject: Asynchronous Protocol Specification Aliance - any one heard of it?
Summary: Does anyone know how to find more information out about APS
	from Electronic Messaging Association
Keywords: X.400 Telephone
Organization: CSIRO DIT (Melb.)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 93 04:06:31 GMT

   On Page 37 of Australian Communications December/January 1992-3 I find the
following tidbit:

  X.400 Group to Speed E-Mail

  A new group has been formed to develop a standard way to send X.400
  electronic mail across ordinary telephone networks. Called the Asynchronous
  Protocol Specification (APS) Aliance. The group was formed in late October
  at the Electronic Messaging Association conference by Isocor, an e-mail
  developer, and Norwegian Telecom. If an APS specification results the group
  will make it available to the public domain and will propose it to the CCITT
  for formal standardisation. Other companies involved in the alliance include
  Apple, Microsoft, British Telecom, DBP Telekom, Transpac and Thompson Syseca.

Some that was hard to read on the fax copy I got so spellings might be slightly
wrong. Does anyone know:

	1. Of this group?
	2. A contact for this group?
	3. An idea of what the spec will be based on - i.e. seeing that X.25
	across asynchronous lines is now blessed by ISO as a standard.


		Thanks

			Andrew Worsley
CSIRO, Division of Information Technology (Melbourne),     Phone +61 3 282 2614
723 Swanston St.                                           Fax   +61 3 282 2600
Carlton, Vic, 3053, Australia                   Email:worsley@mel.dit.csiro.au


--
CSIRO, Division of Information Technology (Melbourne),     Phone +61 3 282 2614
723 Swanston St.                                           Fax   +61 3 282 2600
Carlton, Vic, 3053, Australia                   Email:worsley@mel.dit.csiro.au
From: stari@romeppc.VNET.IBM.COM (Mauro Starinieri)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 09:35:09 CET
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re: X400 for PROFS
Organization: IBM Semea - RNSL
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0

In <9212211548.aa03575@q2.ics.uci.edu>
   /PN=Thomas.K.Hinders/OU=CCMAIL/O=CHAN.IS/PRMD=MMC/ADMD=TELEMAIL/C=US
   /@srint.com writes:
>    Besides Soft$witch does anyone know of an X400 gw to/from PROFS/OV?
>
>    Thanks...............
>
>                                Thomas K Hinders
>                       Martin Marietta Computing Standards
>                             4795 Meadow Wood Lane
>                               Chantilly, VA 22021
>                        703.802.5593 (v) 703.802.5027 (f)
>

If you are looking for products that permits you to achieve a gateway
between PROFS/OV and X.400 network, the following IBM solutions
are available:

   a. VM system
      ---------
      - OSI/Communications Subsystems: the IBM OSI tower.
      - Open Network Distributions Systems (ONDS X.400): the X.400 MTA.
      - X.400 Profs Connection: the X.400 User Agent and the bridge
        with PROFS/OfficeVision VM.

   b. MVS system
      ----------
      - OSI/Communications Subsystems: the IBM OSI tower.
      - Open Network Distributions Systems (ONDS X.400): the X.400 MTA.
      - X.400 Disoss Connection: the bridge between PROFS/OfficeVision  .
        MVS and ONDS X.400.

   c. AS/400 system
      -------------
      - OSI/Communications Subsystems: the IBM OSI tower.
      - OSI Messages Services/400 (OSIMS X.400): the X.400 MTA, UA
        and the bridge with OfficeVision/400.                           .

If you are looking for an operative gateway, you can use the IBM Mail
Exchange service. This is a powerful gateway between IBM electronic
mail systems (PROFS, OfficeVision, DISOSS...), FAX systems, telex and
X.400 networks. The following is a list of X.400 networks already
connected to IBM Mail Exchange service (note that this list is not
updated, some other networks have been connected):

   - AT&T Easylink
   - Dialcom
   - MCI Mail
   - Memocom-400NET
   - QUICK-COMM
   - SprintMail


Regards,
   Mauro Starinieri
   Rome Networking Systems Laboratory
   via Paolo di Dono, 44 - 00143 Rome (Italy)
   Tel: +39-6-5187.2331
   FAX: +39-6-5187.2596
   E-MAIL: IBMMAIL(ITIBMP4L)
   X.400: c=IT/a=IBMX400/p=IBMMAIL/s=Starinieri/g=Mauro
From: research@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Mike Leavitt)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re: Compulsory address fields
Date: 22 Dec 92 03:19:50 GMT
Reply-To: research@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Mike Leavitt)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Office of Communications, Engineering Group

Aren't there additional address fields in the U. S. GOSIP specifications
that go beyond the standard and are compulsory?

Mike
From: talicea@arinc.com (TA)
Subject: Re: X.400-SMTP Gateway
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Date: 22 Dec 92 16:48:31 GMT

DO you have an RFC number for MIME-MHS Internet Draft?
Thanks,

Tony Alicea   ta@arinc.com
Aeronautical Radio
Annapolis, MD USA
==================================================


>The ISODE Consortium release of PP will in the near future
>support gatewaying between MIME and X.400 according to the
>MIME-MHS Internet-Drafts.
>--
>                   Harald Tveit Alvestrand
>Harald.Alvestrand@delab.sintef.no
>C=no;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=delab;S=alvestrand;G=harald
>+47 7 59 70 94
From: mstern@arinc.com (MYS)
Subject: Internet to IBMMAIL
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Date: 23 Dec 92 15:00:03 GMT

          Is it possible to write to a user on IBMMAIL given his
          user-id directly from the Internet? If so, can someone let
          me know how?

          Thanks in advance!
          Michael
          -----------------------------------------------------------
          Michael F. Stern              Annapolis, Maryland 21401 USA
          Aeronautical Radio, Inc.      (v) 410 266 4146
          2551 Riva Road                (f) 410 266 4499

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: rharmon@uucp (Robert Harmon)
Subject: PP6.0/Isode smtp channel
Organization: Arinc Research Corporation, Annapolis MD
Distribution: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Date: 30 Dec 92 14:28:45


I get the following error message which I'm having trouble pinning down:

<-(220 muon PP Here - Pleased to meet you (Complaints/bugs to:  postmaster@srg.af.mil))
->(HELO triton)
<-(250 muon: Looks good to me)
->(MAIL FROM:<akerson@triton.srg.af.mil>)
<-(501 Unknown local user 'akerson')
unknown problem, cannot deliver, couldn't return
to 'akerson@triton.srg.af.mil', trying orphanage, couldn't return.
->(RSET)
Problem address ending: no valid addresses
.....
.....
<-(250 OK)

Do I have to create local users for Anyone who wants to send to me?
I think I have a configuration problem, but this message leaves me clueless.
Can anyone enlighten me?

--
rharmon@srg.uunet.uu.net        |
Robert B. Harmon ms:5-230       |  Causing touble, ...again?
Arinc Research 2551 Riva Rd.    |  
Annapolis, Md 21401             |
From: jpalme@dsv.su.se (Jacob Palme DSV)
Subject: Identification of fields in IPM-like headings
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
X400-Received: by /PRMD=SUNET/ADMD=_/C=SE/;
	Relayed; 26 Dec 92 16:12:32+0100
Date: 26 Dec 92 15:18:51 GMT

I am just now trying to define som ASN.1 for group communication.

In group communication, there is a need to be able to refer
individually to the links defined by various heading fields
in an IPM-like heading. For example, primary-recipients creates
a sequence of links to recipients, and replied-to-IPM creates
a sequence of links to messages.

I want to be able to encode operations like "REMOVE the link
from message M to the recipient R". This can be done in two
ways. Either, I quote as arguments to the REMOVE operation
the IPM Identifier of the message M and the name of the recipient R,
or I quote as arguments to the REMOVE operation the IPM Identifier
of the message M plus the position of the reference to the
recipient R in the IPM heading.

A disadvantage with the first method is that it fails in cases
where the same recipient R occurs several times in the IPM-like
heading, since you do not know whether the intention is to
remove both, or only one of them, and if so, which of them.

Because of this, I intend to try the second method. What I need
is basically a way of identifying or naming the individual links
which occur in different heading fields in the IPM-like heading.

I am thus trying to define an ASN.1 which looks something like
this:

LinkName ::= SEQUENCE
        {
             ipmid-part,     IPMIdentifier, --- from X.420
             link-position   INTEGER (0<..MAX)
        }

Question one: Any more comments on the idea of identifying
links as part of IPM-like headings in this way. Is it OK,
or to hacked to be suitable?

Question two: Any comment on the choice between the two ways
of identifying the link to remove as discussed above?

Question three: Is it possible to define a fully defined
enumeration of the links in an IPM-like heading. There is
no problem with the elements of for example primary-recipients,
since this is defined as a SEQUENCE OF, i.e. with a defined
order.

There is however a problem with the heading fields, since
the IPM Heading is defined as a SET, i.e. no defined order
between the different heading fields.

One way of constructing an order would be to say that
number 1 is given to the originator field (if present),
the next numbers go to the elements of the authorizing-users
field (if any) and so on, ordering the heading fields by
their tag values in their definition in clause 7.2 of X.420.

Would this be an acceptable or suitable way to do.

Question four: A fourth alternative would be not to try to
use an IPM-like format at all for group communication
contributions. This would of course be neater, but then one
would lose the possibillity of co-working between IPM
messaging and group communication which I personally
find very desirable. What is your opinion on this?
From: /PN=Thomas.K.Hinders/OU=CCMAIL/O=CHAN.IS/PRMD=MMC/ADMD=TELEMAIL/C=US/@sprint.com
Subject: X400 for PROFS
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
X-Message-Id: <"393312201292"*/PN=Thomas.K.Hinders/OU=CCMAIL/O=CHAN.IS/PRMD=MMC/ADMD=TELEMAIL/C=US/@sprint.com>
Date: 21 Dec 92 23:48:06 GMT

    Besides Soft$witch does anyone know of an X400 gw to/from PROFS/OV?

    Thanks...............

                                Thomas K Hinders
                       Martin Marietta Computing Standards
                             4795 Meadow Wood Lane
                               Chantilly, VA 22021
                        703.802.5593 (v) 703.802.5027 (f)
From: kit@gateway.mitre.org (Kit Lueder)
Subject: Re:  X400 for PROFS
Full-Name: Kit Lueder
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Date: 22 Dec 92 14:55:43 GMT

> Besides Soft$witch does anyone know of an X400 gw to/from PROFS/OV?

The following have PROFS/X.400 gateways:

Alcatel/TITN remarkets OSIWare X.400. Alcatel/TITN phone is 510-484-5674,
   OSIWare is 604-436-2922.

Control Data has EP/IX Mail*Hub.  Phone 612-482-6736.

Digital Equipment Corp. MAILbus, Message Router X.400 Gateway (with
   another gateway product for PROFS). Phone 508-493-7161.

Fischer International Systems Corp. EMC2/TAO (V.3.3). Phone 813-643-1500.

IBM, Open Network Distribution Services/<MVS or VM> with X.400 Feature.
   IBM catalog solutions is 800-426-2255.

Microsoft Corp. Microsoft Mail for PC Networks (V3.0) and Microsoft Mail
   Gateway to X.400 (V3.0). Phone 206-882-8080.

Soft-Switch, Inc. Soft-Switch Central with Soft-Switch X.400 Gateway,
   or Soft-Switch Enterprise Mail Exchange (EMX) (1988). Phone 215-640-9600.

Vermation, Inc. Memo/X.400 with Memo/Gateways. Phone 201-767-4795.

WordPerfect Corp. WordPerfect Connections EasyLink Gateway. Phone
   801-225-5000.



(The above is not a product endorsement, and there are no claims
for accuracy or completeness.)


Kit Lueder

email: kit@gateway.mitre.org
phone: 703-883-5205
fax:   703-883-7142
Postal: Kit Lueder
        The MITRE Corporation
        Mail Stop W558
        7525 Colshire Dr.
        McLean, VA 22102
From: goh@mprgate.mpr.ca (Mei-Jean Goh)
Subject: Re: X400 Vendor in Western Canada      
Keywords: X400 Canada
Organization: MPR Teltech Ltd
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 17:15:23 GMT


OSIware's phone and email contacts are given below:

OSIware Inc.				Tel: +1-604-436-2922
4400 Dominion Street, Suite 210		Fax: +1-604-436-3192
Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5G 4G3		

Contact:
Allan Steiner or 
P. Moller at e-mail: moller@vancouver.osiware.bc.ca

------------
Mei-Jean Goh			
MPR Teltech Ltd., MS 24B 	
8999 Nelson Way, Burnaby, BC     E-Mail: goh@mpr.ca
Canada, V5A 4B5                          mprgate.mpr.ca!goh@uunet.uu.net
From: aac@hiwa61.com (Al Christian)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re: X400 for PROFS
Date: 22 Dec 92 16:58:58 GMT

> Besides Softswitch does anyone know of an X400 gw to/from PROFS/OV?
>
> Thanks...............

Digital Equipment Corporation has the best one that I've tested.  It
looks like a PROFS node to the SNA world and an X400 MTA to the OSI
world.  PROFS users can address others just like they are  PROFs
users and the X.400 people can address the PROFS people just like
they are X.400 people.

al
From: labovit@merit.edu (Craig Labovitz)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.dev-environ
Subject: Problems compiling ISODE 8.0 on Sun
Date: 21 Dec 1992 21:47:30 GMT
Organization: Merit Network, Inc.  Ann Arbor, MI
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: merit.edu

I've had problems compiling ISODE 8.0 (with patch 1) on
a Sun Sparc station running Sun 4.1.

For some strange reason, its not linking with the math
libraries during the basic system make (i.e. ./make).

I get something like:
  cc -g    -I. -I../h -DPEPYPATH  -PIC -c tsapd.c
  cc -g -o xtsapd tsapd.o -L../ -lisode -L/usr/local/lib/ 
  ld: Undefined symbol
     _pow
     _infinity
  *** Error code 2
  cc -g    -I. -I../h -DPEPYPATH  -PIC -c isod.c
  cc -g -o xisod isod.o -L../ -lisode -L/usr/local/lib/ 
  ld: Undefined symbol
     _pow
     _infinity
  *** Error code 2
  cc -g    -I. -I../h -DPEPYPATH  -PIC -c isoc.c
  cc -g -o xisoc isoc.o -L../ -lisode -L/usr/local/lib/ 
  ld: Undefined symbol
     _pow
     _infinity

and then the make continues on for a bit until it gets
grumpy, and gives lots of errors about not being
able to make assorted object files.

The make still fails even when I stick in flags to link with
math library.

I have compiled ISODE 8.0 on other machines without a problem.
Has anyone experienced anything similar?  Any suggestions?


Thanks.

- Craig 


Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
From: peterd@pjd.dev.cdx.mot.com (Peter Desnoyers)
Subject: Re: Book or docs for X.25 implementers?
Organization: Motorola Codex, Canton, Massachusetts
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:01:17 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.230520.9801@nosc.mil> psm@nosc.mil(Scot Mcintosh) writes:
>Does anyone know of books, articles, or other kinds of
>documents that would be of help to someone implementing
>the X.25 protocol? In particular, some[thing that goes i]nto excruciating 
>detail in terms of how to handle the interface for each state and event 
>that could take place would be of great benefit. ...

You might want to check out the code in the netccitt directory of the
NET/2 Berkeley UNIX distribution. It's a pretty full implementation of
an X.25 DTE, and might be useful as a reference.

[this is the only freely available X.25 packet layer implementation I
know of on the net. For LAPB implementation hints you can also check
out the link layer code from Phil Karn's KA9Q package.]

				Peter Desnoyers
--
From: ag129@cus.cam.ac.uk (Alasdair Grant)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: OSI and standard modules (like packet) ?
Date: 23 Dec 92 12:31:43 GMT
Organization: U of Cambridge, England

In article <57953@dime.cs.umass.edu> shri@unreal.cs.umass.edu (H.Shrikumar) writes:
>  There is the X-APIA specification for X.400 access. And other than that
>only things like NETBIOS, or packet driver at lower layers. Not useful.
>  (Am I missing something ?)  If not, perhaps there is some scope
>for defining an interface standard for DOS accessing lower layer too.

Check out Novell's ODI (Open Datalink Interface).  It appears to be more
flexible than NDIS or packet drivers; in fact both these interfaces can
easily be provided on top of ODI.

I would have said this even before the recent announcement that Novell is
buying USL!
From: marjon@cs.kun.nl (Marjon Chirill)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Looking for info about ISO-9000 standards
Keywords: Quality management
Date: 24 Dec 92 13:23:57 GMT
Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

I am posting this for a friend in Suriname (South-America).
He needs information about quality management. The key-words are

ISO-9000 standards
Quality assesment
Quality control

If someone can please help me as to which databases I can access to find some
info about these subjects. Or if you already have a file containing info please
don't hesitate to send it to me by e-mail.

Thanks for your help.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marjon Chirill                 |   Percy van Kanten
e-mail: marjon@cs.kun.nl       |   e-mail: vankante@uvs.edu.sr
The Netherlands.               |   Suriname. (South-America)
From: jpalme@dsv.SU.SE (Jacob Palme DSV)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Question about the SET construct of ASN.1
Date: 27 Dec 92 08:41:06 GMT

I have a question about the SET construct in ASN.1.

I know that the SET construct allows the agent which encodes in ASN.1
to put the elements in arbitrary order.

My question is: Does this mean that the order of the element
is totally insignificant, and that the construct might be unpacked
and packet with a different order of the elements during
transmission?

Or can one assume that the order in which the elements were coded
by the encoding agent will be preserved when the deconding agent
unpacks the ASN.1 structure?
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
From: mklai@ie.cuhk.hk (Edmund M K Lai)
Subject: Formal Specifications of ISO Protocols
Organization: Faculty of Engineering, The Chinese U. of Hong Kong
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 06:44:33 GMT

I am looking for ISO protocols of any layer that has already been formally
specified in one of the major formal specification languages such as
LOTOS and ESTELLE.  So far I have only been able to locate simple data
link layer protocols with formal specifications.

Any pointers would be helpful.  Thank you.

Edmund Lai
Department of Information Engineering
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong

email: mklai@ie.cuhk.hk
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
From: shri@unreal.cs.umass.edu (H.Shrikumar)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: OSI and standard modules (like packet) ?
Date: 23 Dec 92 03:07:58 GMT
Reply-To: shri@unreal.cs.umass.edu (H.Shrikumar)
Organization: UMass, Amherst MA + Temporal Sys & Computer Networks Bombay India

> In article <1gqaiuEINNhdo@uni-erlangen.de> 
   mskuhn@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de writes:
>>unikjtf@uts.uni-c.dk (Jan Ferre') writes:
>>
>>>Why not define interfaces for specific computerseries operating systems ...
>>>   Interface to TP is done via device OSITP on DOS.

In article <1h6qdjINNmhj@bnsgd245.bnr.co.uk> iann@bnr.co.uk (Ian Newman) writes:
> What is the difference between .. propose and TLI, .. XTI  ..

> Agreed! Let's use the ones that are available!

  I think the original poster was concentrating on DOS. The scene is 
not so clear there, as it is with UNIX (TLI/socket etc).

  There is the X-APIA specification for X.400 access. And other than that
only things like NETBIOS, or packet driver at lower layers. Not useful.

  (Am I missing something ?)  If not, perhaps there is some scope
for defining an interface standard for DOS accessing lower layer too.

  Perhaps, if something like the Mess-DOS ISODE port is ported to such a
standard it can gain some momentum. It can give the mix-and-match
power that the packet driver gave you at the NIU card level.

-- shrikumar ( shri@legato.cs.umass.edu, shri@iucaa.ernet.in )

PS: BTW, is there a copy of the XAPIA on-line somewhere ? (dont think so ;)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Estelle Verification Tool?
From: jira@elc1.lat.oz.au (Ajin Jirachiefpattana)
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 04:25:53 GMT
Organization: Comp Sci, La Trobe Uni, Australia

Hi everybody,

Besides ESTIM (Estelle SimulaTor Based on an Interpretative Machine) prototyped
by LAAS within the framework of SEDOS project, I just wonder if there is any
Estelle verification tool available via anonymous ftp. Any related information
would be greatly appreciated. 

Thanks,

Ajin Jirachiefpattana,

jira@latcs1.lat.oz.au
Department of Computer Science & Computer Engineering,
La Trobe University,
Bundoora, Vic., 3083.
Australia.

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
From: ima@isis.cs.wayne.edu (Imran Ahmad)
Subject: Infromation about ISO 9000 series standards
Organization: Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 16:55:39 GMT

Hi Netters:

I don't read this news group and therefore is unfamiliar of any discussion on
this topic in the past.

I have hear about some ISO 9000 series communictions/computers standards
(to be implemented from 1993). I will appreciate any information or 
references on this topic. My email address is:

		ima@cs.wayne.edu
or if this bounces the mail back, try: ima@pandora.cs.wayne.edu

Thanks

Imran 






Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
From: brian@mel.dit.csiro.au (Brian May)
Subject: Re: XOM/XMP documents
Keywords: XOM, XMP
Organization: CSIRO DIT (Melb.)
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 03:30:30 GMT


In article <1hpugkINN91a@iraul1.ira.uka.de>, guenther@ira.uka.de (Guenther Schreiner) writes:
|> Hello,
|>  I'm looking for the standardization documents describing XMP and XOM
|>  (ASN.1 stuff). Any pointers would be helpfuls.

You can obtain these documents from X/Open in the UK:

X/Open Company Limited
Apex Plaza
Forbury Road
Reading
Berkshire RG1 1AX
UK

or email to:

XoSpecs@xopen.co.uk

--------------------------------

It's worth noting that XOM is being 'standardized' by the IEEE (P1224).
P1224 is 'strongly' based upon XOM. I haven't catalogued the differences
and don't know if anyone has (P1224 is not completely out of the draft 
phase yet). I think an XMP equivalent is undergoing the same treatment.

If you have any queries on XOM, don't hesitate to email me, as I've
implemented that API. The experience was not pleasant!

regards,

brian may.
--
| Brian.May@mel.dit.csiro.au |           Open Systems Program           |
| CSIRO/DIT, 723 Swanston st | TEL +61 3 282 2613 -- FAX +61 3 282 2600 |
|Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia|          Experimental Scientist          |
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso
From: ima@isis.cs.wayne.edu (Imran Ahmad)
Subject: Information about ISO 9000 series standards
Organization: Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 21:55:18 GMT

Hi Netters:

I don't read this news group and therefore is unfamiliar of any discussion on
this topic in the past.

I have hear about some ISO 9000 series communictions/computers standards
(to be implemented from 1993). I will appreciate any information or 
references on this topic. My email address is:

		ima@cs.wayne.edu
or if this bounces the mail back, try: ima@pandora.cs.wayne.edu

Thanks

Imran