HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: GHC@VGER.NIDDK.NIH.GOV (Gerson H Cohen)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: Re: Login limit not honored by rlogin
Date: 2 Sep 92 23:17:06 GMT
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: Gerson H Cohen <GHC@VGER.NIDDK.NIH.GOV>
X-VMS-To: IN%"Adelman@TGV.COM"
X-VMS-Cc: INFO-MULTINET,GHC

> > I just noticed that a set log/int=0 can be gotten around by a user
> > entering with rlogin.  I notice that ftp will also succeed in spite
> > of the limit.  Telnet honors the limit properly.  All of this is for
> > MultiNet 3.1B on a VMS 5.3-1 system.
> 
>     FTP isn't an interactive login.
> 
>     RLOGIN checks to see if the limit is zero, and if it is and the
> user doesn't have OPER priv, fails the login. Are you sure you don't
> have OPER priv?
> 
>     When you TELNET, loginout does the check.

OK - I accept the explanation for FTP and I was slightly wrong about the
RLOGIN.  No - I did not have OPER priv when I tried it.  In fact another
user was logged in when I had limited the access.  The key is your comment
that RLOGIN checks for a limit of zero.  I tried that and it does work.
BUT with a login limit of 1 and already 5 logged an RLOGIN attempt was
not blocked as it should have (telnet or set host would be blocked).

-
Dr Gerson H Cohen
National Institutes of Health
Bldg 2, Room 312
Bethesda, MD  20892
'Phone: (301)496-4295
Internet: ghc@vger.niddk.nih.gov
BITNet:   ghc@nihklmb
From: MCKEEVER@VAX2.CSTP.UMKC.EDU (Brian McKeever)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: Multinet analog to UN*X "showmount -e"?
Date: 27 Aug 92 00:40:30 GMT
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: Brian McKeever <MCKEEVER@VAX2.CSTP.UMKC.EDU>
X-Envelope-to: info-multinet@tgv.com
X-VMS-To: IN%"info-multinet@tgv.com"

Is there any Multinet utilit(y/ies) that provide functionality similar to
the UN*X command "showmount"?  And if so, where might it be documented?  I
couldn't find anything in the online docs.

Thanks,

--Brian
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
From: eric@sejnet.sunet.se (Eric Thomas)
Subject: Re: Do UCX and Multinet support nonblocking I/O?
Reply-To: ERIC@SEARN.SUNET.SE
Organization: SUNET, Stockholm, Sweden
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 02:44:21 GMT

In article <dank.715215744@blacks>, dank@blacks.jpl.nasa.gov (Daniel R. Kegel) writes:
> Hi,
> I want to port to VMS a Unix program which initiates several
> connections to TCP servers and uses nonblocking I/O
> to manage all the connections simultaneously.

Porting unix socket-based code to VMS is easy (at least with Multinet), it
mostly compiles the first time and making it work is just a matter of replacing
the many system("rm logfile") with more appropriate calls. Finding out that it
doesn't quite perform as well as similar native VMS utilities is the bad
surprise. Realizing that the VMS-ported server isn't slower than the native
unix one only takes a minute or so, and deciding to do something about it is a
matter of seconds if, like me, you cannot stand things which are unnecessarily
slow.

Changing the server to use asynchronous calls everywhere is easy and solves the
problem admirably (again with Multinet, and assuming you are familiar with
AST's). The difficulty is convincing unix people who are impressed with the
performance of your server on that despicable little 2 mipser and would like a
copy of your code that this cannot be done under unix. Just sending them the
code won't work, because they will come back 10ms later with questions about
all this IO$_ crap. Explaining takes time and usually results in religious
statements about why Things should not be done that way, which is precisely why
it can't be done with unix. Eventually you will wish you had just put up with
the slow response time instead of trying to prove to the world that things
don't have to be that slow - my advice ;-)

  Eric
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 01 SEP 92 23:11:40 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Subject:  Re: More TALK problems.
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

> I have having a problem using TALK. I have a friend on a SUN 4/65
> running UNIX (don't know what version, it is math.nmsu.edu). I have
> tried both TALK and TALK/OLD.  TALK doesn't get any response at all,
> while TALK/OLD wouldn't work because "address family not supported."
> Does anyone have any ideas what might be going on? Is there anything
> that can be installed on the SUN or VMS to make talk work?

    TALK/OLD won't work between machines with a different byte
order (eg, SUNs and VAXen).

    TALK (the UNIX name is called "ntalk") hasn't been supported by
SUN yet. If you have access to BSD sources, you can compile it
from them. There is no other way to talk between the VAXen and
the SUNs unless SUN supports NTALK.

							Ken
From: mcohenca@uspif.if.usp.br (Joseph Max Cohenca)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: RE: whois server?
Date: 26 Aug 92 00:30:38 GMT
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: Joseph Max Cohenca <mcohenca@uspif.if.usp.br>

=>
=>Does anyone have a whois server for VMS/Multinet?
=>
I know danton@dem.inpe.br has an experimental one. 
Please let me know if you find another one. 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! Joseph Max Cohenca          !        Hepnet: uspif::mcohenca                !
! Centro de Computacao        !        Hecnet: 47602::mcohenca                !
! Instituto de Fisica da      !        Renpac: psi%11182594::uspif::mcohenca  !
! Universidade de Sao Paulo   !      Internet: mcohenca@uspif.if.usp.br       !
! Caixa Postal 20516          !  Bitnet: mcohenca%uspif.hepnet@brfapesp.bitnet! 
! 01498- Sao Paulo            !          Fone: (011) 815-5599 ext 2110        !
! BRASIL                      !          FAX : (011) 814-0503                 !
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 04 SEP 92 03:28:47 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Subject:  Re: decwindows, multinet, and ucx
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

> Is there some trick to using multinet as the ip transport on a cluster
> node which does not have ucx installed?  In the log file ucx$server_0_error.log
> it says:

> %DECW-W-ATT_FAIL, failed to attach transport TCPIP
> -SYSTEM-W-NOSUCHDEV, no such device available

> and the people from DEC are saying that this occurs if one does not have
> UCX installed on a machine, regardless of whther or not it is being used.
> Is this true?

    No, it isn't. You do not need to install UCX to use the DECwindows
TCP transport over MultiNet with our UCX emulation.

    Do a SHOW DEVICE BGA0 and be sure it is present on your machine.
Also be sure that you start MultiNet from SYSTARTUP_V5.COM so it is
running when DECwindows starts.

							    Ken
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 29 AUG 92 16:58:33 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: John C Klensin <KLENSIN@INFOODS.MIT.EDU>
From: John C Klensin <KLENSIN@INFOODS.MIT.EDU>
Subject: Another cluster DNS question
X-Envelope-to: info-multinet@tgv.com
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community


I hope that we haven't 
I thope that this question isn't as dumb as the last one...
In a homogeneous cluster, Multinet running on all hosts (let's call them
A and B in '.mydomain'), if X is a valid domain, we see...

From A:
   nslookup X.Y.                 works

From B:
 mu  nslookup /type=any X.Y.                 works, but...
 mu  nslookup /type=any X.Y.  A.mydomain.    times out, as does
 mu  nslookup /type=any mydomain. A.mydomain.

If it is relevant, A.mydomain is a secondary DNS server for "mydomain". 
But B has no difficult with
  mu nslookup /type=any mydomain. C.mydomain.
where "C" is the primary server and not in the cluster, nor do
off-domain sites have any problems with
  mu nslookup /type=any mydomain. A.mydomain.

The boot order of these hosts in the cluster was "B" first, then "A",
but this took place a significant amount of time after "A" booted.

Is this normal behavior?  If not, how should it be prevented?  Note that
I don't consider it a bug, since no real harm seems to be done.  But it
is a bit strange and certainly might imply that one did not want to use
intra-cluster forwarders (no forwarders are specified in the
configurations of either A or B.  Yet).

   --john
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 27 AUG 92 18:44:51 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Subject:  Re: "Re: Re: Multinet analog to UN*X showmount -e ?"
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

> In a previous article, Adelman@TGV.COM wrote:
>>
> >> Is there any Multinet utilit(y/ies) that provide functionality similar to
> >> the UN*X command "showmount"?  And if so, where might it be documented?  I
> >> couldn't find anything in the online docs.
>>
> >$ HELP MULTINET SHOW/NFSMOUNT
>>
>>    This command is new to MultiNet V3.1.
>>
>>    Be aware that the database of who has what mounted is not always
> >correct - it is maintained by the mount server based on MOUNT and UMOUNT
> >requests. If a machine crashes with something mounted without sending
> >the UMOUNT request, the mount server don't know about it. As such, mount
> >servers tend to accumulate a lot of rubbish in this list...
>>
>>							     Ken
>   I have seen this rubbish, it is confusing and misleading. How
> does one de-rubbish the list ?

$ multinet netcontrol rpcmount clear

will zero the list, and it will eventually re-accumulate everything
as your clients reboot. The best time to zero the list is right
before the power fails at your site.

						    Ken
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: Re: SMTP not working--  help!
Date: 2 Sep 92 17:14:09 GMT
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM

> SMTP is not working on one of our machines.  It will not accept incoming mail.
> Stopping the SMTP symbiont and running START_SMTP.COM doesn't fix the problem.

> When mail is sent to the node, it never arrives, but the node is capable of
> sending mail to other nodes.

> I would rather not reboot the node since it is very heavily used.  Are there
> other ways of fixing the SMTP mailer?

    Open a support call; 408-427-4366 or SERVICE@TGV.COM. The first
question we'll have is is the SMTP server running, eg, if you:

$ telnet localhost/port=smtp

do you get connected to the SMTP server or do you get some kind of
"Connection refused" error.

							    Ken
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
From: RODRIGOL@BIOMED.UIO.NO (Rodrigo Lopez)
Subject: Problems getting Xwindows to work through tcpip
Organization: The Norwegian EMBnet Node
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 10:20:27 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.22

Hello,

I'm having a problem getting xwindows to display on remote machines
using tcpip as transport.

The error I get is:

MultiNet X11 transport diagnostics starting...
INETACP_FUNC$C_GETHOSTBYNAME $QIO failed
No such file

Any help will be greately appreciated!

Rodrigo:-)


X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 27 AUG 92 18:44:48 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:    JFISHER@ISDRES.ER.USGS.GOV (James R. Fisher 703-648-7026)
From: JFISHER@ISDRES.ER.USGS.GOV
Subject: "Re: Re: Multinet analog to UN*X showmount -e ?"
X-Vmsmail-To: inet%"info-multinet@tgv.com"
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

In a previous article, Adelman@TGV.COM wrote:
> 
>> Is there any Multinet utilit(y/ies) that provide functionality similar to
>> the UN*X command "showmount"?  And if so, where might it be documented?  I
>> couldn't find anything in the online docs.
> 
>$ HELP MULTINET SHOW/NFSMOUNT
> 
>    This command is new to MultiNet V3.1.
> 
>    Be aware that the database of who has what mounted is not always
>correct - it is maintained by the mount server based on MOUNT and UMOUNT
>requests. If a machine crashes with something mounted without sending
>the UMOUNT request, the mount server don't know about it. As such, mount
>servers tend to accumulate a lot of rubbish in this list...
> 
>							    Ken
  I have seen this rubbish, it is confusing and misleading. How 
does one de-rubbish the list ?
-jrf

X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 27 AUG 92 18:44:38 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: Mike Schwartz <schwartz@latour.cs.colorado.edu>
From: Mike Schwartz <schwartz@latour.cs.colorado.edu>
Subject: Re:  A problem with NETFIND (fyi)
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

Mike, I'm surprised at you.  This "problem with Netfind" was in reality a
problem with the information your mailer gives out.  Moreover, one day
after you told me about it, I changed Netfind to detect such problems,
and not give out the invalid information.
 - Mike

X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 24 AUG 92 01:50:21 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: "L. Stuart Vance" <VANCE@TGV.COM>
From: "L. Stuart Vance" <VANCE@TGV.COM>
Subject: Re:  MAP3270 documentation
Organization: TGV, Incorporated
X-Phone: 408/427-4366 (work); 408/427-4365 (fax)
X-Address: 603 Mission Street; Santa Cruz, CA  95060 (work)

>After hitting the backspace key by reflex for the 30284th time, seeing it
>perform a 3270 delete function (like the keypad comma under EDT), producing the
>usual curse and re-inserting the character I had just deleted, I decided today
>was the day I would fix this nonsense. I already knew how to edit MAP3270
>settings and everything, I just needed the list of available functions and the
>escape code for the various keys.
>
>Unfortunately, the online help did not provide much help. I ended up having to
>FTP the unix version of tn3270, extracting the man files from the package,
>finding out how to format them, and then writing a program to get the codes of
>the keys I wanted to assign. I now have the 3270 delete function on the REMOVE
>key, which in fact is very close to the location of the delete key on a real
>3270 keyboard, and the backspace working as expected, so my problem is solved.
>However, I don't think I should have to FTP unix programs to get a description
>of the MAP3270 options. Could this be included in the online help for the next
>version?

The main problem with documenting how MAP3270.DAT works, is that what you
specify in the file for a key definition depends on what ASCII codes
particular keys on your terminal generate.  A "^A" is (pretty much) guaranteed
to send the same ASCII code (001) by any terminal.  However, what "F1" sends
might be different for different terminal types.

>How hard would it be to allow key names a la DEFINE/KEY to be
>specified, in addition to the escape sequence scheme? Could we also get a user
>exit to decide what constitutes a word, and whether the end of a word is its
>last character or the position after it? The tn3270 definition is both stupid
>and different from the (equally stupid) behaviour of real 3270's.

A DEFINE /KEY function would be nice; I'll put that into our list of projects.
It'll take some special thought, however, to figure out how to do it for the
normal command line of FTP, MU CONFIG, etc. as well as for TN3270.

A user exit for the end of a word?  Bleah.  I've spent a brief bit of time
looking through the code, and it's pretty hairy.  Have to think about that
some...

Regards!
-----Stuart
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 27 AUG 92 18:44:41 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Subject:  Re: Multinet analog to UN*X "showmount -e"?
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

> >> Is there any Multinet utilit(y/ies) that provide functionality similar to
> >> the UN*X command "showmount"?  And if so, where might it be documented?  I
> >> couldn't find anything in the online docs.
>>
>> $ HELP MULTINET SHOW/NFSMOUNT
>>
>>     This command is new to MultiNet V3.1.

> Thanks.  That helps.	One more thing though, "showmount" will take a
> hostname as a parameter so I can querry other NFS servers for what they are
> exporting (or think they are exporting).  Is there any way to get MU
> SHO/NFSMOUNT to accept a hostname?

    /REMOTE=

						    Ken
From: SADVARY%DICKINSN.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (Sadvary, Bill)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: DEBNA problem?
Date: 27 Aug 92 20:46:03 GMT
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: "Sadvary, Bill" <SADVARY%DICKINSN.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>


I just upgraded our VAX 6320 from VMS v5.4-2 to v5.4-3.  I did the DEC
CSCPAT_0543012.a to fix the problem with the "ETDRIVER not being able to
receive broadcast packets" and Multinet seems to be working just fine.

But, we lost the connectivity to our VAX from AppleTalk.  I do remember a
mention of this DEBNA problem being seen also with AppleTalk.

We're running PacerLink v6.0-1 and ATK/VMS v3.0.  The problem is that the
Appletalk services are not available when looking at the listed zones on a MAC
or whatever.

Has anybody else seen this problem?

-Bill Sadvary
 sadvary@dickinson.edu
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 28 AUG 92 16:54:34 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Subject:  Re: What is the format of the WHOIS database?
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

> In article <2020402127AUG92204552@TGV.COM>, ACCESS@KRDC.INT.ALCAN.CA (Shawn Allin - Alcan KRDC Computer Services) writes:
> >
> >We have an internal TCP/IP network here that is growing by the day.	Users
> >are now wanting a name lookup service to aid in connectivity.  I was
> >thinking of using WHOIS internally.	I took a look at RFC954, but can't
> >find any reference to how to set up a private database.  Is it doable/
> >practical?
> >
> I'm working on one for our internal net.  The format of the database really
> doesn't matter, what matters is the format of the reply to the requestor, which
> is fairly well defined in RFC812.  You can either specify /HOST= to point to
> your server or modify the CLD to do the same by default.  the latter is easier
> on the user, but harder on the system manager, as each upgrade of MultiNet may
> require reinstalling this modification.  Of course, my other platforms are not
> nearly as gracious, and offer more opportunities.  ("We don't have problems,
> just opportunities")

    Actually, you can "SET WHOIS-DEFAULT-SERVER" in MU CONFIGURE under
V3.0 and later MultiNet to change the default server without modifying
the .CLD file.

							Ken
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: Re: Backup-Problems with a NFS-Mounted Disk
Date: 3 Sep 92 17:26:51 GMT
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM

> I have a Problem if try to use backup.

> "dg2user" is a DECstation-disk and mounted via nfs.

> $ Backup dg2user:/image xxx.bck/sav tells me:
> %BACKUP-F-PROCINDEX, error processing index file on DG2USER:, RVN 1
> -SYSTEM-W-NOSUCHFILE, no such file
> $ backup dg2user:[000000...] xxx.bck/sav says:
> %BACKUP-E-OPENIN, error opening DG2USER:[000000]VAXINF.DIR;1 as input
> -SYSTEM-W-NOSUCHFILE, no such file
> for all directories.

> $ dir dg2user:[000000...] works!

> So what's wrong?

    What version of MultiNet are you running? The problem with BACKUP
is fixed in V3.1.

							    Ken

X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 27 AUG 92 06:42:17 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Subject:  Re: Multinet analog to UN*X "showmount -e"?
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

> Is there any Multinet utilit(y/ies) that provide functionality similar to
> the UN*X command "showmount"?  And if so, where might it be documented?  I
> couldn't find anything in the online docs.

$ HELP MULTINET SHOW/NFSMOUNT

    This command is new to MultiNet V3.1.

    Be aware that the database of who has what mounted is not always
correct - it is maintained by the mount server based on MOUNT and UMOUNT
requests. If a machine crashes with something mounted without sending
the UMOUNT request, the mount server don't know about it. As such, mount
servers tend to accumulate a lot of rubbish in this list...

							    Ken
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: Re: Login limit not honored by rlogin
Date: 2 Sep 92 23:17:11 GMT
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM

>> > I just noticed that a set log/int=0 can be gotten around by a user
>> > entering with rlogin.  I notice that ftp will also succeed in spite
>> > of the limit.  Telnet honors the limit properly.  All of this is for
>> > MultiNet 3.1B on a VMS 5.3-1 system.
>>
>>     FTP isn't an interactive login.
>>
>>     RLOGIN checks to see if the limit is zero, and if it is and the
>> user doesn't have OPER priv, fails the login. Are you sure you don't
>> have OPER priv?
>>
>>     When you TELNET, loginout does the check.

> OK - I accept the explanation for FTP and I was slightly wrong about the
> RLOGIN.  No - I did not have OPER priv when I tried it.  In fact another
> user was logged in when I had limited the access.  The key is your comment
> that RLOGIN checks for a limit of zero.  I tried that and it does work.
> BUT with a login limit of 1 and already 5 logged an RLOGIN attempt was
> not blocked as it should have (telnet or set host would be blocked).

    The problem is that LOGINOUT, when invoked by RLOGIN to login a
user without checking the password, also bypasses these other checks.
We do some of them ourselves (eg, checking for logins completely
disabled), but don't want to try to get into the business of tracking
every change that DEC makes to LOGINOUT.  When DEC provides a callable
interface to LOGINOUT which lets us do this, we'll use it.  In the
mean time, if you need the login limit enforcement, you'll need to
disable RLOGIN.

							    Ken

Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
From: coleve@cc.uvcc.edu
Subject: Re:  Re: Lame delegation error?
Organization: Utah Valley Community College
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 03:31:53 GMT

In article <20201C2624AUG92175328@TGV.COM>, adelman@TGV.COM writes:
>>      Had an interesting error on the console last night.
> 
>> MultiNet Server: ns: Lame delegation to 'PROGRESS.com' received from
>>		   192.35.82.2 (purported server for 'PROGRESS.com' )
> 
>     It means that the PROGRESS.COM nameserver is misconfigured.

For a minute there I thought it had something to do with the
Republican National Convention!


-- (sorry, couldn't resist.....) 
-- Vern Cole -- Systems Manager -- Utah Valley Community College --
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet