HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dalef@whatnext.apl.washington.edu (dale funk)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Help! windows mathematica
Keywords: mathematica
Date: 2 Sep 92 15:54:44 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Sep2.155444.8855
Reply-To: dalef@whatnext.apl.washington.edu
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Washington


I've been using mathematica on a NeXT and it works great.
I started using the microsoft windows version on a 486 and it
seems to have real problems.
I'm new to the 486 so clue me in.
I keep getting an error window saying something to the effect that
I need to change the memory in my pif editor or reduce the number of 
applications running.  The problem is that only windows and mathematica
are running and I don't quite know what to do about the pif editor
I did try changing the default in the pif to 0 and I thought that would
allow windows to use the minimum memory. Still crashed.
Any suggestions. Oh, incidentally, mathematica is a memory hog for sure.

******************************
dale
e-mail:  dalef@whatnext.apl.washington.edu
From: shedevil@vix.com (Anne P. Mitchell JD)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Cursor Vanishes with TSR Program
Date: 1 Sep 92 21:27:03 GMT
Organization: Fathers' Rights & Equality Exchange
NNTP-Posting-Host: gw.home.vix.com


We are running a small calendar program which is a TSR...when you hit
alt-1 [or whatever combo you assign] a schedule pops up, and you can
type appointments onto the appropriate day [in case it matters, the
program is called "Schedule"].

Anyway, on some computers I can run it without a problem, but on
others the cursor vanishes when I get into the place where I can type
an appointment.  I can still type, but without a visible cursor I have
no idea what time-slot line I am about to type on.

Does anyone have any idea what might be causing this?  Are there any
things I can check in terms of the dos environment..or?

Thanks!
From: nelson@hepxvt.ps.uci.edu (Matt Nelson)
Subject: PGPLOT anybody?
Summary: has anybody ported PGPLOT to MS FORTRAN?
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Keywords: PGPLOT, MS FORTRAN, port
Date: 4 Sep 92 15:48:06 GMT


hey!  i just picked up a copy of Microsoft FORTRAN ($65 (educational
discount vs. $300+ retail)).  looks pretty good so far...

the question:  has anybody out there ported the PGPLOT plotting subroutine
package (created at Caltech by Tim Pearson) to the PC under MS FORTRAN?
i tried compiling all of the source (minus the drivers) on our VAX using
the /F77 switch, and all of it compiled with no errors or warnings.  this
tells me that it souldnt be too tough to port it (one could use the
graphics.lib supplied with the compiler to build the device driver...).

before i try, has anybody else already done this?  has anybody tried and
failed?  is it MUCH more difficult than to do than i think?

anybody?    anybody?    mr. beuler?


thanks....
matt (nelson@master.ps.uci.edu)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: kelley@vet.vet.purdue.edu (Stephen Kelley)
Subject: Re: OS2 - What is it ?
Organization: Purdue University SVM
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 19:07:58 GMT

In article <1992Aug29.095440.11188@actrix.gen.nz> Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes:
- In article <1992Aug28.022052.27664@nmt.edu> ehobbs@nmt.edu (Eric Hobbs) writes:
- > 
- > Someone said that programs that have their own memory manager will
- > not run in OS/2.  Is there an option at bootup that will allow the
- > user to boot into DOS rather than OS/2 so that you _can_ run 
- > those programs that use their own memory management?
- 
- OS/2 V2.0 has three possible configurations with repect to booting the system.
- 
- 3. Boot manager - you can have multiple OSes sharing the same disk (or disks).
- UNIX(s), OS/2(s), DOS(s)....please yourself. I think the limit is 5 different
- systems. They can't see each other's partitions - especially UNIX's which are
	
This is the option that I use; it's extremely helpful.  This statement isn't
exactly accurate, though -- OS/2 *CAN* see and use DOS partitions, with no
problem, as long as OS/2 is installed on a logical drive in an extended
DOS partition, rather than on its own primary partition.  This installation
*does* allow the OS/2 partition to be formatted as HPFS.  If it is, the 
DOS partition can't see it.  The DOS sessions under OS/2 see it perfectly,
of course.

Sorry if this explanation seems complicated.  Upshot is:
	Yes, OS/2 and DOS can coexist, with a boot-time selector.
	YES, if you do it right, OS/2 will see the DOS partition.
	YES, if OS/2 is on a FAT partition, DOS will see it; if 
		OS/2 is on an HPFS partition, DOS won't.

I haven't seen the need to put UNIX in the picture on my own box.

Steve
From: drice@ponder.csci.unt.edu (Keith Rice)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: ProComm 2.4.3 Kermit up/down-load times
Date: 31 Aug 92 23:41:33 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of North Texas

In <92243.062901IP25179@portland.caps.maine.edu> IP25179@portland.caps.maine.edu writes:


>  When I download in Kermit using ProComm 2.4.3, the estimated time for the
>  process shown in the pop-up 'window' is always half of the actual time re-
>  quired.  Do I have some untapped potential here that I'm missing?  Or is
>  the program just a taco short of a combination platter?

I've had the same problems whenever I attempt to download from or upload
to UNT's systems from my home PC.  Our systems here are all connected via
a LAN and it takes a bit longer for the LAN to pass the packets along.
At least that's the way it is here.

--
D. Keith Rice -- University of North Texas -- drice@ponder.csci.unt.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Beta Test: To voluntarily entrust one's data, livelihood and sanity to
           hardware or software intended to destroy all three.  In
           earlier days, virgins were selected to beta test volcanoes.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: kris@microware.com (Kris Hoffmeyer)
Subject: Re: Speaking of Window NT
Keywords: Microsoft, Window_NT, SLOW
Organization: Microware Systems Corp., Des Moines, Iowa
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 20:08:50 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.161704.17154@cis.ohio-state.edu> cantor@boa.cis.ohio-state.edu (scott eric cantor) writes:
>>According to a friend who's running Window NT beta, it is slow as hell...
>>(he equated it to Window 3.1 running on 286 with 1MB of RAM) And mind you,
>>he's running Window NT on a 486DX-50 with 32 MB RAM and 1.2 GIG HD...
>
>	I don't know what the heck your friend's doing, but I can practically
>guarantee you it's something wrong.  We have NT running on a Dell 483/33 with
>16 megs of RAM, and it's performance is certainly acceptable.  It took about
>20+ demo programs running at the same time before we noticed an appreciable
>CPU slowdown.  If you want slow, try OS/2 on a 4 meg 386.

Just a question...  What exactly is acceptable?  Especially considering
you're running on a 486/33?  Did you try running NT on a 4 meg 386?

Kris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Whatever I may be saying must be consumed with as many grains of salt
-   as required and is not to be mistaken as Microware's words.
-
- Kris Hoffmeyer
- Microware Systems Corporation
- Des Moines,  Iowa  50325-7077
- (    UUCP: !uunet!mcrware!krish)  (Internet: krish@microware.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: f89-kam@dront.nada.kth.se (Klas Mellbourn)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: What difference does the bus make?
Date: 26 Aug 92 08:28:33 GMT
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

I am going to buy a 486/33 EISA or a 486/50 ISA. Which do you recommend?
What difference does the bus make with respect to multitasking anyway?  
-- 
Klas Mellbourn     I tel +46 8 15 56 17        I  Hi  I'm a .sig virus
Koersbaersv 3:110  I                           I  copy me into your .sig
S-114 23 Stockholm I                           I  to join in!
SWEDEN		   I e-mail f89-kam@nada.kth.seI 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: jlb31348@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jim Brain)
Subject: Compac computer help
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 18:16:44 GMT

I have two questions, and one involves the title of this message.  At the
U of I, we have a COMPAC DESKPRO 286/12Mhz model 2550 with a floppy drive and
1 meg or so of memory.  We would like to put a hard drive in it and up the
memory, but we need to know if anyone has any manuals, hints, extra hardware,
or freebies they would consider telling us about.  We need all the info we can get, as we will be forced to junk it unless I can prove to the group of
students that own it that it can be turned into a good machine for some tasks.

Any help would be appreciated.


On another note, I would like to know who to contact to find out how to
interface a IBM style floppy drive to a nother type of system.  Interested
in any info you can provide on who to contact for pinouts of the connector, 
routines, etc.  I currently have some cheap 3.5 drives I would like to put in
some projects whinch have the standard IBM style connectors.



Jim Brain
brain@cs.uiuc.edu

-- 
Jim Brain, Power Glove Serial Interface Project Leader (for the summer)
brain@cs.uiuc.edu
Yes, my last name REALLY is BRAIN!
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: gettys@regent.enet.dec.com (Bob Gettys)
Subject: Re: Which is faster Qbasic or GWBasic
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 05:05:29 GMT


In article <reichert.715377642@aloe1>, reichert@rtsg.mot.com (Charles H. Reichert) writes...
>wiegand@rtsg.mot.com (Robert Wiegand) writes:
> 
>>cwatters@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Coyt D Watters) writes:
> 
>>>That's pretty much the question.  Is QBASIC (supplied with DOS 5.x) faster
>>>than the equivalent GWBASIC program?
> 
----stuff deleted

>>>Email or Postings gladly accepted.
>>>-Coyt
> 
>>Someone please correct me if i'm wrong - but I believe Qbasic is compiled
>>while GWbasic is interpreted. This would make Qbasic much faster.
>>It also means that once you compile the programs you don't need Qbasic
>>to run them.
> 
>Yes, that's the "Basic" truth!  QBasic will compile the GWBasic unless
>Commodore used some different commands.  QBasic will still use Line 
>Numbering.  Using QBasic's editor you can do a search and replace very
>quickly.  Example, the old TI-94 Basic used clr or clear instead of cls.
>Also use of :, ; to indicate end of line was different.  I quickly converted
>and then compiled using QBasic 4.5 without any problems.
> 
>	Chuck Reichert



	Whoops - there are things getting mixed up here. GWbasic is strictly an
interpreted basic. Qbasic as supplied with DOS5 is also an interpretated basic
which is a stripped down version of Quick Basic 4.5 which does include a 
compiler.  As to which of the interpreted basic's is faster, I don't know. But
the Qbasic will be very easily moved into Quick Basic if you need to. GWbasic
will need to be work over more to do the move. There is also more structured
type language in the Qbasic which might make it easier to write.

	/s/	Bob Gettys
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: why does everybody hate microsoft?
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 11:39:05 GMT
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange

In article <1992Aug26.003525.8542@sunb10.cs.uiuc.edu> stangel@sparc3.cs.uiuc.edu (Mike Stangel) writes:
> 
> >Besides, the GUI is a pile of rubish, and NT isn't supposed to be 
> >compatible with their own DOS/DOG operating system.

YES! The Win3.1 program manager is not as good as the OS/2 WorkPlace Shell.
Period.

> 
> Windows NT is written almost entirely in C, which makes it rather portable.
> In fact, as I understand it, you might want to look to see Windows NT 
> running on a Mac in six months...

MAC users will love that! I don't know a single MAC user who would give up
their GUI for the Win3.x program manager.......
 
If NT had the WPS, I might think about it - all other things being equal (
don't have the dough for a 64-bit computer....not yet, anyway).

Though, if they were eaula, I'd stay with OS/2. I mean, my PC only has one
CPU.

 
Steve

-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | If you don't vote for MMP on 
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         |  September 19, 1992, then you 
withers_s@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz            |  must like things the way they 
**** Happy user of OS/2 v2!! ****       |  are.....can I live with YOU?
From:  (Slobbering Flame Dog)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: 386SX 20MHz w/80MB HD and 14" SVGA
Date: 29 Aug 92 00:13:02 GMT
Organization: U of Washington


At least you know that it isn't a good deal.
That is comforting...

In article <1992Aug28.231716.12732@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>, baltman@prodigal.psych.rochester.edu (Brian Altman) writes:
> 
> 386SX 20MHz w/80MB HD and 14" SVGA package for sale. E-mail
> for specifics. Will break it up only is I find buyers for
> all parts. Asking price $1150 + shipping. No flames please,
> if you don't want to pay that much then don't. Oh yeah, that
> is for a new system- never used. Includes MS-DOS 5.0
> 
> -Brian
> 
>
From: frank@cs.yorku.ca (Frank Pikelner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Heard of Opti 386WB motherboard??
Date: 27 Aug 92 14:31:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: yetti.1420
Distribution: world
Organization: York University, Dept. of Computer Science

In article <BtLuFA.D7t@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, ajt@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Andy Thomas) writes:
|> 
|>  >From: ca566@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Holloway)
|>  >Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
|>  >Subject: Heard of Opti 386WB motherboard??
|>  >Message-ID: <1992Aug20.212156.6336@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
|>  >Date: 20 Aug 92 21:21:56 GMT
|>  >Reply-To: ca566@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Holloway)
|>  >Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
|>  >
|>  >
|>  >Has anyone heard of a motherboard called Opti 386WB?  Do you have the name
|>  >and phone number of the manufacturer or their US representitive?  I have a
|>  >bad motherboard that calls itself an Opti 386WB Ver 1.0, made in Taiwan. 
|>  >The retailer I bought it from is not interested in supporting the product
|>  >and I was wondering what information I might be able to get either from the
|>  >company or from other people with Opti boards.  Any information will be
|>  >appreciated greatly?
|>  >
|>  >
|>  >Thanks
|>  >Mike
|> 
|>   I have had one of these for a little over a week.  I got mine from
|> ABS Computer Technologies.  It's on sale now - 386/40 w/4MB and 64K
|> cache for $298.  When I got it, it didn't work at first.  I reseated
|> some of the chips and it started working.  Also, the manual shows the
|> jumpers for the cache size select backwards.  (It came with the jumpers
|> in the right place).
|> 
|> Andy Thomas
|> ajt@mentor.cc.purdue.edu

My motherboard is by EXCLUSIVE and is a OPTI 386/WB (40MHz). I've got 2 of these
machines running and so far, so good.
-- 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ---  ---    Frank Pikelner                                          /~\
 \    \  \   Technical Assistant, Department of Computer Science    <v.v>
  \-   \--   York University (Toronto, Canada)                      ,\^/;
   \    \    Internet: frank@cs.yorku.ca                            _{!}_
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim)
Subject: Re: Why does everybody hate microsoft
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 21:32:00 GMT

fwbent@watmsg.uwaterloo.ca (Fred Bent) writes:

>In article <1684F14DEC.S947460@UMSLVMA.UMSL.EDU> S947460@UMSLVMA.UMSL.EDU (Andrew Zaitsev) writes:
>>
>>It looks like mechanisms of changing the historical documents described
>>by George Orwell in "1984" would be very useful for Microsoft.

>I cannot see anything that Bill Gates said (that you quoted) that is
>inaccurate or misleading....  

Well, I have the OS/2 Notebook by Microsoft Press.  Here are some
Bill Gates quotes:

"Another strong message is the high level of commitment that our
companies [IBM and Microsoft] have to OS/2 ..."

"Microsoft has not changed any of its plans for Windows.  It is
obvious that we will not include things like threads and preemptive
multitasking in Windows.  By the time we added that, you would
have OS/2."

"Most users of high-end applications will be using a 386 and therefore
want OS/2 2.0"

In all fairness, B. Gates did hint pretty strongly that MS's support for
OS/2 was dependent on how well it sold.
-- 
John H. Kim                 | (This space to be filled when I
jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu | think of something very clever 
uunet!jarthur!jokim         | to use as a disclaimer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Why does everybody hate microsoft
From: S947460@UMSLVMA.UMSL.EDU (Andrew Zaitsev)
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 04:44:43 GMT
Organization: UM ST. LOUIS

Most of the previous posts already include my reasons for
hating microsoft.
I decided to post, because yesterday I had a new experience,
that even made my feelings deeper.
I went to the bookstore to see if there are any new books on OS/2
and I was most surprised to find on the most visible place OS/2
book published by ... Microsoft Press. First couldn't believe my
eyes, I thought that the Evil Empire is changing if they release
books on the product they used to boycott ...Well, I was wrong -
the book was published in 1990, before the Great Split.
Anyway, I browsed thru the book and in the section called OS/2 2.0
(in 1990!) there was an interview with Bill Gates. He sounded very
persistive, telling reporter that OS/2 is the system of the future
and that Microsoft is not going to incorporate sophisticated multi-
tasking in Windows, leaving it to OS/2, and above all, he confirmed
that Windows is just an upgrade path to OS/2.
 
It looks like mechanisms of changing the historical documents described
by George Orwell in "1984" would be very useful for Microsoft.
From: hts@acs.bu.edu (homayoon sagafi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Is there any way that I can do this.. ( HELP )
Date: 4 Sep 92 20:28:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: bu.95394
Organization: Boston University, Boston, MA, USA


  Hi..
  I have a TurboGrafix16 with a cdplayer.. On the back of the cdplayer, there
is a port for cd-rom.. I was woundering that if there is any way that I can 
connect the cdplayer to my computer..
  I have an IBM compatible 286/12Mhz...
  I have a sony internal CD-ROM too.. I just wanted to know if I can have
two cd-roms on my computer..
   Any help would be appreiciated.. Thanks
            E-mail { hts@acs.bu.edu }    -Peymaan
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
From: drice@ponder.csci.unt.edu (Keith Rice)
Subject: Re: Basica
Organization: University of North Texas
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 23:34:47 GMT

In <BtJG5L.w3@brunel.ac.uk> Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk (Alan J Holmes) writes:

>I have an IBM clone with a hard disc. I just mention this in case its important.

>I have tried, after booting from the hard disc, to run basica from disc,
>the only responce I get is:-

>divide overflow

>I have asked a few people how to get it started but have come up against
>a blank wall, most people have got the same result I have and have given up.

>What am I doing wrong? 

>Regards

>Alan Holmes

It sounds like you are running IBM PC-DOS on your clone.  If so, BASICA
will not run on your clone because IBM BASICA needs to have IBM ROM
BASIC installed in the computer to run properly.  You can do one of
two things:

1.	Install MS-DOS instead of PC-DOS on your system and use its
	version of BASICA or GWBASIC, or
2.	Get an IBM ROM BASIC rom from an old PC and install it in your
	system.


--
D. Keith Rice -- University of North Texas -- drice@ponder.csci.unt.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Beta Test: To voluntarily entrust one's data, livelihood and sanity to
           hardware or software intended to destroy all three.  In
           earlier days, virgins were selected to beta test volcanoes.
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:11915 comp.os.msdos.apps:4522 comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:3368
From: frisk@complex.is (Fridrik Skulason)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: What is the best anti-virus program???
Date: 26 Aug 92 20:20:37 GMT
Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Organization: Frisk Software International, Iceland


In article <1992Aug26.142519.6625@donau.et.tudelft.nl>, andreas@dutedib.et.tudelft.nl (A.A.Buykx) writes:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I recently downloaded f-prot.exe and I downloaded earlier virscan. Now my
> question is (I am a novice in *anti* virus programs):
>    Which one of these, or which other program should I use to 
>    protect my beloved computer from being crunched by some virus.
> 
> Thanks for your help, Andreas
[.sig file deleted]


Well, as I am the primary author of F-PROT, I am obviously biased :-) but
the answer is really that it does not matter.

Both programs are likely to detect any virus you are ever likely to encounter.
There are differences, of course, but they are primarily in disinfection
capabilities, interface design and abilities to detect totally new viruses.

But why not use both - we don't always receive new viruses simultaneously,
and there will always be some viruses one of us detects, but not the other
one.  However, those are usually just recent "VirusBBS" viruses - not the
ones that are ever likely to hit any "real" user.

-frisk
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: fmag9694@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Fouad M. Abdel-Rahim)
Subject: Re: What is the best anti-virus program???
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 22:14:29 GMT

frisk@complex.is (Fridrik Skulason) writes:


 [ stuff deleted ]


>Well, as I am the primary author of F-PROT, I am obviously biased :-) but
>the answer is really that it does not matter.


>-frisk


     What is the latest version of F-PROT, I am using  [ 2.04a ].

     Thanks.

-- 
	 Fouad Abdel-Rahim                              | _<  .
	 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign   \ |  o__o
	 School of Art and Design                     / | _/
From: ifap327@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Help please: AT system clock won't update after midnight
Date: 23 Aug 92 17:47:17 GMT
Reply-To: ifap327@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu ()
Distribution: usa
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX
Originator: ifap327@daisy.cc.utexas.edu

Hi everyone,

a long time ago I read an article in some PC mag about the system clock
not updating the date when the PC is left idle all night; ie the time is
correct but the date is not increased when passing midnight.

I didn't pay much attention at the time because I didn't have the problem,
but now I do.  Any ideas what might cause the problem or how to correct it
(short of manually setting the date each morning).

Thanks!
Joachim






Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: kelson@ais.org (David Lewis)
Subject: A good Machine Language Monitor
Organization: UMCC
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 22:12:46 GMT




  Does anyone know of a good PD machine language monitor or assembly
language debugger out on the net via ftp?

keslon@ais.org

Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:11956 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:22814
From: small@bcstec.ca.boeing.com (Peter Small)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Clock in AST Six Pack Board.
Keywords: How is it set?
Date: 27 Aug 92 14:19:19 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Organization: Boeing Computer Services, Seattle

How is the clock on an AST Six Pack Board?  This board is a memory/clock/
multi IO board.  I am running on an XT and would like to be able to see
the clock on the board.  ALso, running with DOS 3.2.

Thanks,

PS

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--  Peter Small                  small@bcstec.ca.boeing.com                  --
--                               uunet!bcstec!small                          --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc