From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast,soc.misc,alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Want facts?  "WHO RUNS THE MEDIA?  The Alarming Facts"
Date: 7 Apr 92 13:50:36 GMT
Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <gate.JF5RiB1w164w@b-cpu.UUCP> ralphw@b-cpu.UUCP (Ralph Winston) writes:
>                             Newspapers
> 
>     Sixty-two million newspapers are sold each day.  They are divided
>into 1,745 different publications.  One might expect sheer numbers to
>preclude minority control, but the facts prove otherwise.
> 
>     More than half of the major dailies in America are under direct
>control or indirect control of Jews, a minority that makes up only 2.9%
>of the population.  

This is interesting.  "Indirect" control?  By this, Ralphie means:

(1) people who are married to Jews
(2) People who have relatives married to Jews
(3) Newspapers that out of several dozen executive officers, have a Jew
    or two.

You start adding up all of those figures, then realize that newspaper
owners are drawn from the subset of the population that's relatively
well-educated, and "Jews" aren't 2.9% of the population any more.  

>This situation has come about as a consequence of
>the complete dependence of all papers on advertising revenue.  In every
>major city Jews have predominance in the mercantile trade, which
>includes department stores, large furniture outlets, discount stores,
>etc.  When large advertisers choose to favor one newspaper over another
>with their business, that newspaper prospers, and its competitors
>suffer.  As Jewish mercantile power has increased there has been a
>steady decline both in the numbers of newspapers in major cities along
>with a decline in competing Gentile papers -- primarily as a result of
>selective advertising by Jewish merchants.

How is that the Jews gained "predominance" in the mercantile trade
when they refused to advertise in the Gentile papers?  Or do all of
these innocent Gentiles only buy Jewish papers because they have more
advertising?


>     Even the papers still under gentile ownership are so thoroughly
>dependent on Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news
>reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and
>dislikes.  In the newspaper industry as elsewhere, he who pays the
>piper calls the tune.

Truth by blatant Assertion.  Any facts to back this up Ralphie?

>     As Jewish control over American newspapers has grown, the
>newspaper business has lost its original competitive, free-enterprise
>nature and has become monopolistic.  In over 89% of American cities
>which have a local daily, there is no competitor.  Only in 55 of the
>nation's largest cities is there daily newspaper competition, and in
>most of them it is nominal competition between a morning and afternoon
>paper under the same ownership. For example, the New Orleans morning
>"Times-Picayune" and the afternoon "States-Item", along with 26 other
>dailies and 21 Sunday papers, are owned by the Jewish Newhouse family.

And television had nothing to do with newspapers going out of business.
(Oh, but NBC has a Jewish vice president, so the Jews control television,
too.  And cable, also, I bet -- doesn't Will Eisen of "2000 Flushes"
advertise on CNN?)

>     The Newhouse family also owns the 20 magazines of the Conde Nast
>Group ("Glamour", "Mademoiselle", "Vogue", "House and Garden,"
>"Bride's", "Self", and 14 others); Random House books (Alfred A. Knopf,
>Ballantine, Vintage Books, Pantheon Books, Modern Library, and Fawcett
>Books); a number of TV and radio stations; some 20 cable-TV systems,
>and the Sunday supplement "Parade" with a circulation of 22 million
>copies a week.

Those damn Jews trying to corner the bridal market!

>     The present Jewish owners are related to Ochs through the marriage
>of Ochs' daughter.  

Ach, you let one Jew in to the family, and suddenly "the Jews" take
over everything your family owns.  By Jewish law, the children of a
Jewish man marrying a Gentile woman are not Jewish, much less the
grandchildren.  Of course, the Nazis didn't care about this, and
killed everyone they could with one Jewish grandparent.  Interesting
how Ralphie takes the one Jewish grandfather of the new editor of the
New York Times to demonstrate that they're Jewish-controlled.  

>     It is presently run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer's
>daughter, who is the principal stockholder and chairman of the
>Washington Post Company. She also owns "Newsweek" and "Inside Sports,"
>and a number of other newspapers, magazines, and news services.

But Graham married a Gentile.  By your logic, that means that Gentiles
control the Washington Post Company.

>     It's not just the big liberal papers that are in Jewish hands; the
>"Wall Street Journal", read by capitalist businessmen and bankers all
>over the world, is owned by the Dow Jones Company, a New York
>Corporation which also publishes 20 other daily newspapers and the
>weekly tabloid "Barron's".  The chairman of the board of directors and
>chief executive officer of Dow Jones is Warren Henry Phillips.  Despite
>the Gentile-sounding name, Phillips is a Jew, the son of Abraham
>Phillips and Juliette Rosenberg.

>     Henry Grunwald is editor-in-chief of Time, Inc. and has overall
>editorial responsibility for all of Time's publications.

Make up your mind.  Is the standard for Jewish control holding a vice
presidency, holding a CEO-ship, holding a presidency, being an editor,
or marrying the grandmother of the current owner?

>     Other media suffer the same plight.  In non-news magazines
>publishing, for example, three of the five largest circulation
>magazines are owned by Jews. They are "TV Guide" (1) published by
>Walter Annesberg's Triangle Publications

TV Guide has not been owned by Annesberg for some time.  Do Australians
control the media, now?

>A week later they invited me back to appear with a
>rabbi, a black leader, and a white liberal.  At the last moment the
>show was cancelled, and I have not been back since.  

Maybe they didn't want to put the rabbi on?  Or do you believe that
they cancelled the Snyder show and ruined the man's career solely to
keep you from being on TV again?

>     If at the beginning of the conversation I would have asked the
>announcer if he thought it would be a good thing if the Arabs had
>practically a monopoly on our media, he would have certainly emoted
>about the inherent dangers of such to our basic constitutional
>liberties and freedoms.  

A lot of subjunctives there.  Using your standards, I can "conclusively"
demonstrate that *any* minority controls 50% of the media, or that
WASPs control 99% of the media.

>No people more ardently support a nation
>in which most of them don't reside.  

The Irish?  The Ukranians?  Cuban exiles?

>Many leading Jewish authors have chastised
>America for not declaring war on Germany immediately upon Hitler's
>ascension to power.

As well as many Christian authors.  Though they probably had a friend
who married a Jew also.
 
>     Take for example the Israel-Arab conflict.  The media tells us
>that Israel is the only real democracy in the Middle East, when the
>truth is that over a million Arabs in Israel don't have the right to
>vote, or any rights of citizenship.

Not true.

>     In the latest invasion of Lebanon, over one-half million people
>were made homeless and 10,000 civilians were killed.  

Since the latest invasion of Lebanon was by Syria, ask yourself how much
coverage that received relative to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon which
was far less brutal.

>     Of course, the pro-Zionist position of the U.S. government has
>cost us dearly in the Mideast.  We have alienated Arab states, many of
>which have resources vital to the well-being of America, and in turn
>helped the communist cause by pushing Arabs to closer positions with
>the Soviet Union, our worst enemy.  

Ummmmm....

>     At that point, I ask the host if he has ever in his lifetime
>watched TV, for if he had, how could any living being believe that the
>bulk of what one sees on TV is produced by talent?  Furthermore, is it
>uplifting, does it instill in our youth the value system of our fathers
>or a potpourri of sex, violence, and inanity?

Since when did the Fox Network become controlled by Jews?

>Of course, we Gentiles are obviously
>bereft of talent. Twain, Hemingway, Tennyson, Shakespeare, and a
>thousand more must have all been Jews!  In actual fact, of course, Jews
>have constituted less than 1% of the great writers and playwrights of
>English and European literature, but now we are supposed to believe
>that this 2.9% produces the most talent.

Hmm.  Check out the Nobel Prizes.  Or did the Jews take over Sweden, also?

>Increasingly, the elite of American media is
>becoming a country club with very strict admissions policies, the
>primary one being having a Jewish mother.

Interesting, because half the people you named to "prove" Jewish dominance
didn't have a Jewish mother.

>     Racism and finances have given the Jewish minority its preeminent
>power in media.  The same racism that causes many Jewish merchants to
>bring all their newspaper advertising to the Jewish-owned daily rather
>than the Gentile-owned one.  

One example of this Ralphie.  Give one example.

>[A sketched drawing of a family of three watching seven televisions at
>once appears with the caption, "Does the increasing number of channels
>actually give us freedom of choice or just give the media moguls more
>power and wealth?"]

Note how the reality that most of the new cable-channels have no Jews
on 'em at all is completely ignored.  

>NAAWP; Box 10625; New Orleans, LA 70181.

Ohhhhh, this is the organization David Duke founded!!!!!  Wait 'til
arf hears about this.

>                                Ralph Winston
>
>UUCP:  Path (..twiki!b-cpu) "ELIMINATED" BY ZIONIST THOUGHT POLICE!!!

A lie.  B-cpu has a path and people have received both postings and
e-mail from it.
-- 
Ted Frank          + "A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged, it
1307 E 60 St, #109 +  is the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in
U o' C Law Skool   +  color and content according to the circumstances and
Chi, IL 60637      +  the time in which it is used."  --  Holmes
Newsgroups: misc.headlines