HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca (Gene Ward Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 13 Apr 92 04:59:59 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Centre Interuniversitaire en Calcul Mathematique Algebrique

In article <Z3D6iB1w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

>Fine.. You get queers to write letters and get that silly word
>added..... I've got a few myself. ;)

This suggests an interesting contest--just how small is the Karnes
vocabulary? When that becomes boring, just how small is the Karnes
penis? Could these become useful devices for measurement? One might
lay claim to a vocabulary of 8 Karnes, a penis of 17 Karnes, and an
IQ of 106 Karnes, for instance.





--
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/CICMA/Concordia University 
                  gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca
From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Kevindarcyism
Date: 9 Apr 92 20:41:07 GMT
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon

In article <29df2e3b.crud@crud.mn.org> trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz) writes:
#In article <1992Mar29.055026.26151@rotag.mi.org>
#        kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) babbles:
#
#]The source of your befuddlement flows from a lack of understanding, Mikhail 
#]- we existentialists view a homosexual as being truly "genuine" *AS* that 
#]homosexual is sucking another man's dick or inserting his penis into the 
#]other's anus. *THAT* is "genuine" homosexuality, not the act of reflectively
#]_acknowledging_ one's homosexuality after the fact. Genuine traits are purely 
#]the domain of the _pour-soi_ (pre-reflective consciousness); non-genuine ones, 
#]the domain of the "ego" (post-reflective consciousness). "Bad faith" arises 
#]when there is a split, or "scissiparity" between the pour-soi and the ego, 
#]e.g. in a person who engages exclusively in homosexual acts, but denies to
#]themself that they are gay. And, of course, "bad faith" is as close as an 
#]existentialist gets to the concept of Evil.
#
#All very soft-philosophical and perfectly impervious to rigorous
#demonstration.  Mr. Darcy, it is time you joined your dead
#philosophers and leave psychology and neurology to psychologists and
#neurologists.  As another dead philosopher (Russell) pointed out, once
#we have methods of investigating such matters they cease to be in the
#realm of philosophy.  When you can claim credentials in psychology and
#neurology, then come here and lecture on what is and what isn't
#homosexuality.
#
#As to whether the act or the reflection is the homosexuality, this is
#not only an arbitrary decision, it is also a useless one.  Taxonomy is
#not knowledge; it increases knowledge not at all, and at best is a
#tool.  However, you spend too much time playing with your tools, so go
#do something else.  A person who actually wishes to learn something
#will speak of the act and of the reflection, and investigate both, and
#will not waste effort by determining (in the leisure of pure thought)
#that one is the homosexuality and the other isn't.  It is obvious that
#both are involved in the person, and the person is the crux of the
#investigation.  Your approach is at best an examination of the
#activities of your own brain, and doubtless plagued by feedback (or,
#more likely, "backup").
#
#And, in any case, you seem capable of no more than repeating what your
#dead philosophers have said.  I dare to attribute your beliefs to
#esthetic attraction rather than rationality.  Had you done painting
#school instead of philosophy school, you'd probably claim Seurat knew
#the secret of the universe, unless you happened to prefer Leonardo.
#
#
#--
#Barry Schwartz        trashman@crud.mn.org


That was real purty, Barry.  Do it again sometime, okay?

Susan
TSAKC
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6349 alt.politics.homosexuality:1846
From: dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 8 Apr 92 15:50:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: fido.j9rjbsk
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

In article <ksawiB5w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
>
>> The picture being talked about was two men kissing, not two men fucking.
>
>Read the WHOLE post.  It might have been originally that, BUT, the post
>that I replied to was, Tim saying that it was ok for THAT (fucking) to be in
>the paper.  Thats pornographic, and that is JUST what I said..


But fucking was not in the paper.  Therefore, it was a straw man.


>Don't change the issue back when it doesn't suit you.


Learn to argue.  Putting up a straw man (which is what your "fucking in 
the newspaper" argument is) and then defending it, is changing the argument.
However, since you resisted my putting the argument back on track, I will
address your point.

Pictures of two men fucking is pornography, just like pictures of a man and
a woman fucking.  Yes.  However, there was not picture on two men fucking
uncovered on the newsstands.  It was a picture of two men kissing, which is
not pornographic.


Your straw man has been burned.




FWA
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinsn@alqualonde.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Declaration of War on PSU
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 03:14:12 GMT

In article <eVD6iB4w164w@GeoWare.COM> efudd@GeoWare.COM (Elmer Fudd) writes:
>kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos) writes:
>
>> Then could you inform everyone on the net as to why one could take your name
>> off the post, put Ken's on, and no one could tell the difference?
>
>Perhaps because we could take your micro-cock, stuff in your nostril,
>and nobody would notice the difference?

It appears as if several body organs are out of place here. It would
seem quite difficult inserting a penis into a nostril. The human body
was not designed for such activities.  

A difference would be noticed, for Mark would be bent into an unhumanly
position. Mark would look quite silly.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6391 alt.politics.homosexuality:1879
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:06:15 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <ie7giB3w164w@Bogus.COM>, punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
> 
> golds_ss@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Stuart S Goldstone) writes:
> 
> > 	We weren't put on this earth with the ability to post articles on
> > Usenet either.  Therefore it's not natural... so get off the net, geek.
> 
> Eat shit and die.

It's heartening to see that, in the face of opposition, your views remain
as reasoned and articulate as ever.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: NetPunk, the number one DUD!!
Date: 14 Apr 92 21:42:09 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <LkomiB2w164w@Bogus.COM>, punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
> 
> ckincy@mcs213d.cs.umr.edu (Charles Kincy) writes:
> 
> > Be sure and mention me in your acceptance speech.
> 
> I doubt that you are worth the effort.  When they give out the nobel prize 
> for ignorace, I will sure mention your name.   ;-)

I'd have to agree; if they ever give out a Nobel Ignorance Prize, you'll
almost certainly be in the running.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
From: keegan@rosebud.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: His friend and nobody else's, Kevin Darcy!
Date: 14 Apr 92 00:41:00 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

after john henders corners kebbin in some, ummmm, typical kebbie
misstatements, kebbie fires back ......

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
-> You can shove you "appearant [sic] contradictions" firmly up
-> your rectum, John Boy. They don't impress me a bit.
-> 
-> >So in light
-> >of your statement, quoted below...
-> >
-> >        "I provide all of the necessary evidence for every claim
-> >        I make, or retract it."
-> >                        Kevin Darcy
-> >                        <1992Feb11.054339.25284@rotag.mi.org>
-> >
-> >    I would appreciate either an apology, a retraction, or
-> >some proof of your allegations.
-> 
-> "Appreciate" anything you want, John Boy, but no "proof" is
-> necessary in this case.

hmmmmm. this looks like kebbie doesn't want to support his claims
as he appears to claim the right to decide just what proof is
necessary. does this surprise anyone?

        "Kevin, your own credibility may continue to decrease
        with longevity, but that's not the case for everyone."
		Jeff d'Arcy <jdarcy@encore.com> 
		<15249@encore.Encore.COM>



--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6992 alt.politics.homosexuality:2277
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 16 Apr 92 04:16:19 GMT
Article-I.D.: Bogus.w23aJB3w164w
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

elf@polari.com writes:

>    The fact that she is not shows just how safely, sanely, and
> carefully we have gone into our respective friendships, be the sexual
> or not, homosexual or not.

You and your wife have extra-marital sex?  Hmm, interesting.



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: they just love kebbie in news * (was Re: THE PURPOSE OF THIS GROUP (alt.abortion.inequity))
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 00:30:18 GMT

In article <1992Apr5.032602.24134@crd.ge.com> keegan@kazoo.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
>
>cathyf@is.rice.edu (Catherine Anne Foulston) writes:
>-> 
>-> If it'll keep the noise out of news.*, so I can take out the
>-> slow but effective killfile entries that keep me from seeing
>-> any reference to the noise when it overflows there where it
>-> doesn't belong, then I'll be happy to carry the group.
>
>isn't it reassuring to see how a well-seserved reputation grows?

Indubitably. Tell me, Jimmy, of the two of us, just *WHICH* was the most 
recent one to crosspost an inappropriate thread to news.admin, hmmm???

I'll give you a hint, Jimmy: <28590@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>

								- Kevin
From: levin@star-trek.bbn.com (Joel B Levin)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: birds 'n bees (was Re: Definitions, personhood...Ref:  Micahel R>)
Date: 8 Apr 1992 13:09:52 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: archive.bbn.com

keegan@kazoo.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:

|kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
|-> The woman did not, in volitional terms, necessarily CREATE her
|-> pregnancy. She CREATED an orgasm, which had a use.

AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!  [ROFL]

|pssst! may i suggest that you speak to a woman or two privately
|about this matter.

I guess!

|or, ask drieux.

Ask somebody!

	/JBL

|charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6551 talk.abortion:14595
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig when he is exposed in another lie (was Re: Keegan Stoops to Attempted Fraud)
Date: 11 Apr 92 17:00:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: rotag.1992Apr11.170030.8666
Organization: Who, me???

In article <1992Apr11.114356.802@crd.ge.com> james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
>In article <1992Apr11.064737.6331@rotag.mi.org>
>	kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>-> In article <1992Apr7.215030.3811@crd.ge.com> keegan@windsurf.crd.ge.com 
>-> (James G Keegan Jr) purported to reproduce an article of mine,
>-> <1992Apr4.181043.18607@rotag.mi.org> verbatim. However,
>-> further inspection reveals that the following paragraph (and
>-> the following paragraph) was missing from that "verbatim"
>-> reproduction:
>
>kevin, stop lying and whining. i never claimed anything was
>"verbatim" in article 1992Apr7.215030.3811@crd.ge.com. 

Your attribution line says "kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:", does
it not? I did not write the article as you presented it, nor is there any
clue, hint or indication that the article had been altered or doctored in
any way. Do you seriously expect anyone to believe that the unwary reader
will just automatically, telepathically, KNOW that an article has been 
"creatively" edited in this manner, without any cue at all? Yeah, right.

Stop distorting my words, you little creep. Stop excising the most important
paragraphs of articles. Stop misrepresenting me. If you can't deal with what
I write, AS I WRITE IT, and you have to resort to distortion and 
misrepresentation, you might as well just admit your little vendetta has 
failed miserably. Thanks for playing. Don't call us, we'll call you.

Fraud.

								- Kevin
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6856 alt.politics.homosexuality:2176
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: FAG, DYKE, AND QUEER ARE ALL IN MY DICTIONARY
Date: 15 Apr 92 03:06:58 GMT
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

asahi@druid.csc.ncsu.edu (B.P. Asahi) writes:

> 
> 
> The word "homophobia" is in the dictionary? So are the words fag, dyke
> and queer!! Homophobia is an irrational fear of homos, I have a rational 
> loathing of homos and their disgusting practices. 


Ahhhhhh...... ;) A rational human being!!

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
From: perrott@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Nicole Ann Perrott)
Subject: Re: Regrets
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 02:38:28 GMT


In article <7iDZiB3w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>
>No. MUCH longer. BTW: 'homophope' is nothing but a 'horror-word'
>intended to incite loathing and such in a person in hope of
>manipulating him/her/it into conforming to your point of view.
>It also is not in any listing of medical terms or dictionary!!!
>
>Try this one: zzyzzzxrphobe
>
>It has just as much meaning.
 
I think you may find that in dictionaries published in the near future
"homophobe" will be included. You seem not to recognize the fact that
languages evolve with use, and new words are continually being incorporated.
Homophobe is used so often now that it is hard to imagine that it not
be included in a CURRENT dictionary.

Sorry to blow your homophobic argument away.

:) N
From: dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This newsgroup has gone to hell!
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 92 11:09:29 GMT
Reply-To: munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac
FollowUp-To: alt.flame
 <2gcHyo8d6@cs.psu.edu> <22603@goofy.Apple.COM>
Keywords: 
Organization: More like Dis~, really.

In article <22603@goofy.Apple.COM>, Lefty writes:

> Well, certified, anyway...

Lefty,

What has gotten into you?

This latest sewage-backup that has overrun alt.f^Hlame has
seemingly brought some 'good' with it. Namely it gives you
endless newbies to faze with your, er, allegations.

I take it you finally got sick of Kebbin?

Good.

You're posting several trillion times more than you usually do.
This is not necessarily a good or bad trait; it is unusual
though. 

{ObScure: KLF's "Justified Ancients of Mu-Mu" really pisses me off.}

I would really like to thank the bastard who faked an Email from
me to my postmaster, and said "I'm going on holidays for three
weeks, can you turn off my newsfeed". Sheesh. 

Perhaps I could blame Oleg for that too? :-)

[Npx! N fzvyrl va nyg.synzr! Lrrfu. Gur arjovrf jvyy or vaprafrq]

Dac
--
munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac      David Andrew Clayton.           // _| _  _
  prolix!dac%eyrie@labtam.oz.au      Canberra, Australia           \X/ (_](_](_
        dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au      I post .
prolix!dac@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au            . . I am.             +61 6 285 2537
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6468 alt.politics.homosexuality:1950
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 00:45:24 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

QAA@psuvm.psu.edu (Tim Bieling) writes:

> Think for a change. Sheesh, another twit - I'm surprised you figured
> out how to make kids (assuming you really have some).
> 
> -Tim

Its easy, why don't you try it?

About that other crap, just read the messages, and talk to Tim Pierce and give
HIM a hard time for a while.



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (From A to B)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts TO Justify "Queer Nation"
Date: 7 Apr 92 12:35:22 GMT
Distribution: world,public
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
> mathew@mantis.co.uk (From A to B) writes:
> > >                                            There is simply nothing
> > > inviting about a hole full of shit. (to put it bluntly).
> > 
> > No wonder you never get laid, then.
> 
> Let me understand this, the reason that he doesn't get laid is that he doesn'
> like a hole full of shit.  Errr..  yeah..  hahah... right....  That makes an
> overwelming amount of sense.  NOT!

I hate to spoil your track record by actually replying to one of your
postings.  Perhaps someone else will explain it to you.


mathew

-- 
Hail Eris! / "Our whole economy's based on fear and death; how long can we get
away with this?" --- Jello Biafra / Message for Kodak: Bring back Dan Bredy! /
PGP RSA public key available on request / Desperately seeking Negativland's U2
CD / Just another would-be Mac owner put off by Apple's monopolistic practices
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7161 alt.politics.homosexuality:2414 alt.sex:15025
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 17 Apr 92 11:40:14 GMT
Reply-To: amorgan@Xenon.Stanford.EDU
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

amorgan@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Crunchy Frog) utterly makes an ass out of
himself by exposing himself to ridicule as follows:

> Bullshit.

Refer to the article I quoted below..

> to chuck net.guidelines are some dipshits who are soooo concerned that
> icky gays post to alt.sex and want a separate newsgroup so they don't
> have to read it and possibly become corrupted themselves.  Would you 
> care to offer some evidence to back your claim up? 
> 
> ... deleted ...
> 
> >-djk
> 
> C Frog
  ^^^^^^ Now they are using FROGS?!?!?!?! ;)

Sure thing ignorant one.. Read on:
joseph!entropy
From: entropy@joseph (Lawrence C Foard)
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin
Subject: Re: BENDING THE GUIDELINES IS BAD NEWS
Date: 10 Apr 92 01:22:12 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Article-I.D.: wpi.1992Apr10.012212.30990

In article <92100.105855JLM@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> JLM@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU writes:
>
>
> The RFD on soc.personals.* has said that two of the
>proposed groups may not passed due to the so called
>"homophobic" voters on the net; so in order to prevent
>this alledged problem, the proposer of the RFD suggested
>suspending the requirement that each group be considered as
>a separate vote.

What is the purpose of allowing a group to be voted down if there is
sufficient interest in it? This seems like a hazard in the creation of
any news group that could be controversial.

Personally I don't think it is a danger in this case, homophobes tend to
post alot and all in caps giving the impression that there are more than
there are, but fortunitly these people only get to vote once unless they
resort to forging votes.  

-- 
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are 99.44% true.            ------  0<p<1  
Hackers do it for fun.  |  Being Bisexual squares your         \    / therefore
"Profesionals" do it for money. |  probability of not getting   \  / p^2<p and
Managers have others do it for them. |  laid on a saturday night.\/ 1-p^2>1-p 

Just one of hundreds. Shall I continue and make you look  like more
of an ass then you already have yourself?

-djk
(^^^ paragon of TRUTH.)

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6616 alt.politics.homosexuality:2025 alt.sex:14244
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 03:46:37 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star) writes:

> And what would you say if I were wearing lipstick?
> 
> BDK:
> >> So, how long have you been a misogynist? As long as you've been a
> >> homophobe?
> 
> DJK:

I'd say heres 24 cents to call a shrink.

> >No. MUCH longer.
> 
> Nothing like digging your own grave.
> 
> Ta,
> BDK


Nothing like creative editing. ;)


-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
From: fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu (Faisal Nameer Jawdat)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: killkillkillkillkillkillkillkill
Date: 9 Apr 92 08:56:02 GMT
Organization: Freshman, Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

to sterilize my sysadmin or to not sterilize my sysadmin

i mean

i've sent 6 fucking messages to this newsgroup in the last week, and
only 1 got through and it was the monotonous inside joke one that didn't
fucking matter

just thought i'd say that and see if this message would get through
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: entropy@banzai (Lawrence C Foard)
Subject: Re: SHIT WORSHIPPING HOMO SPREADING AIDS TO HUNDREDS OF CHILDREN
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:27:36 GMT

In article <1992Apr12.45400.1233@druid.csc.ncsu.edu> asahi@druid.csc.ncsu.edu (B.P. Asahi) writes:
>Can any DUMB GAY BASTARD me ANY reason why that sick faggot's name 
>should not have been released? 

Well since there arn't many dumb gay bastards you might have a problem there.

>Do you faggots care more about
>the life of ONE shit worshipper, or about the lives of hundreds 
>of faggot children who might spread AIDS all over Philly?  

Strange that someone who hates us so much is so concerned about "faggot
children". To bad you didn't care when people made sure that "faggot children"
weren't told about safer sex...

BTW What does releasing this guys name have to do with the possibility of
    kids he may have infected infecting others? Hint nothing...

>Have any of you faggots gotten the urge to receive head
>from a snapping turtle with AIDS? Then go for it, you shit worshippers!!!!

Get a fucking life. I can dredge up hundreds of evil straight people, does
that mean all straight people are evil?

-- 
                                                               ------  
                                                               \    /
    This space accidentally left blank                          \  /
                                                                 \/
Newsgroups: alt.flame