HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kriesel@mari.acc.stolaf.edu (Julie R Kriesel)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT:  Roseanna's nickname
Keywords: sorry if this is really a tan
Date: 21 Jul 92 12:42:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Jul21.124251.6219
Distribution: na
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN

In article <1992Jul21.015624.3672@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> mcdaniel@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (William R McDaniel) writes:
>
>OK, I will attempt to bring forth order from chaos, since I probably
>caused some of the chaos myself.  Mentioned as nicknames for Roseanna
>are:
>RoseHand--This one gets my vote....  
>ChestAnna
>BreastsAnna
>BreastAnna
>BoobsAnna
>BosomAnna
>TasAnna
>BustAnna
>RackAnna
>BBBoob
>DBboob
>3Boob
>rOOseanna
>"Oh my God did you see those things!" (actually a quote from my
>roommate, but it could be a nickname)
>

I hate to be a party pooper, but I find some of these terms really
offensive.  I know that they're all meant in fun, but geez...

Special K
From: anon@no.where (Anonymous)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: GH: How long have YOU watched GH?
Keywords: GH
Date: 22 Jul 92 14:06:11 GMT
Organization: Mail to News Gateway at Wang Labs


Paul's message regarding watching GH since early 70's made me think
that it might be interesting to know how long the netters have been
watching GH...

I have been watching on and off 1976 - 1985 (as my schedule allowed before
VCR) and taping since 1985...  How about you?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: umbryer@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Jeffrey Michael Bryer)
Subject: Re: AW: updates for 7/20 & 7/24
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 17:44:41 GMT

In article <9207280548.AA19946@henson.cc.wwu.edu> n8243057@HENSON.CC.WWU.EDU (NSFosberg) writes:
>
>also, the canadian channel i watch AW on (no, i don't live in canada, but
>i don't have cable and canuck channels are all i can get) isn't showing it
>because they are running olympics.  is it showing on other stations? if
>so, i'd really appreciate regular updates during this period of deprivation.
>after all, 2 wks comes close to time enough for withdrawl, and we wouldn't
>want that to happen, now would we?
>
Here in Winnipeg we get normally get AW at 1:00pm.  With the olympics it
has been bumped up to 9:00am.  Maybe it is still on your station just
at a different time.



-- 
umbryer@ccu.umanitoba.ca | Moderator of the Apogee supplement programs.
Jeff Bryer               | Archived at ccu.umanitoba.ca in pub/wolf3d
Genetics III             |
University of Manitoba   |
From: renees@hplsla.hp.com (Renee Slocumb)
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 15:23:31 GMT
Subject: GH: John Stamos (Blackie) appearance
Organization: HP Lake Stevens, WA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps

Sometime soon, (this week?) while Scotty, Dom and Julia are in San Francisco
they are supposed to run into none other than Full House star John Stamos!

Will Scotty recognize him?  Will he notice a resemblance to Blackie?

Renee 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: gibbsm@ll.mit.edu (MargARET D. Gibbs)
Subject: Re: AMC: cold-cocked with a barbell
Organization: M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 14:15:43 GMT

In article <1992Jul26.230025.16241@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> GAINES@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu (Richard Gaines Jr.) writes:
>It was Travis Montgomery!  As I remember Tom was drunk and this was about the
>time that Travis and Barbara slept together to try and save little Molly's life!

Richard, you are right on target!  And welcome to another new poster!

Maybe the AMC group could do something like the ATWT group is doing:
a day for lurkers to come out and tell us something about yourselves.

I remember last year during some of the more boring AMC storylines,
a lot of AMC ratsers wrote a short bio of themselves and posted it
to the net.  Candy Doss was collecting them, I think.  Do you still
have them, Candy?  I'm pretty sure there were a lot more bios posted
than are even in the yearbook!  (For those who want to know more about 
the yearbook, I'll be posting more about that later.)


-- 
Margaret D. Gibbs		"Practice random kindness and 
Assistant Staff			 senseless acts of beauty"
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
gibbsm@ll.mit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: pamela@keps.kodak.com (Pamela Blalock)
Subject: Re: AMC: New Charlie & Pods
Organization: Kodak Electronic Printing Systems
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 21:44:11 GMT

Well I really like the new Charlie, for a lot of the same reasons I liked
Tad. He's not a Ken-doll. He's relaxed on-camera and he seems to be having
fun. Good sense of humor and timing. So since they can't lure Tad away from
grape-stomping, thank you AMC for giving us a good *cousin*


-- 
Pamela Blalock                                     pamela@keps.kodak.com
Kodak Electronic Printing Systems, Inc             7 down, 5 to go!
164 Lexington Road, Billerica, MA 01821-3984
From: semele@OSCAR.BELLCORE.COM (Semele Halkedis)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: ATWT: inmate list
Date: 29 Jul 92 12:24:14 GMT

Has anyone out there been keeping track of the new wardees?

If not, I would be willing to start keeping a list.  Maybe new wardees
could email me their names, email addresses, and nicknames.  I'll
add them to JlJ's list of ward members. 

JlJ - Is the last one you posted the most up-to-date 
one you have, or have you been adding to it?
(in which case there might not be a need for this)  

What do you think?  Or is there a better way to do this?  Maybe from
the Jeepmeister's mailing list??


GGG


-------------------------
Semele Halkedis
semele@oscar.bellcore.com
From: darcy@panix.com (Darcy Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: OLTL: Re: Neither Max nor Kevin is Daddy
Date: 24 Jul 92 18:34:17 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC

In article <9207241336.AA15801@crdgw1.ge.com> root@hp546.ae.ge.com (Chuck Sanford) writes:
>From rec.arts.tv.soaps Thu Jul 23 17:19:16 1992
>Path: hp804.ae.ge.com!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!crdgw1!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!widener!phlpa!scott
>From: scott@phlpa.pha.pa.us (Scott Scheingold)
>Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
>Subject: Re: OLTL: Neither Max nor Kevin is Daddy?
>Message-ID: <1992Jul21.101948.1107@phlpa.pha.pa.us>
>Date: 21 Jul 92 10:19:48 GMT
>References: <9207201624.AA06234@crdgw1.ge.com>
>Organization: Ians' Playhouse
>Lines: 36
>
>In article <1992Jul21.101948.1107@phlpa.pha.pa.us> scott@phlpa.pha.pa.us
>(Scott Scheingold) writes:
>
>>In article <9207201624.AA06234@crdgw1.ge.com> root@hp546.ae.ge.com (Chuck Sanford) writes:
>>>I thought of another possibility about who the father of Lee Ann's
>>>baby is.  Remember that she went to Sweetwater Texas after breaking it
>>>off with Max.  During this time, she got drunk and went to bed with
>>>some bar bum -- was his name Tom something?  Anyway, I expect they
>>>will say that since Max failed the paternity test that Kevin MUST be
>>>the father.  However,  everyone seems to have forgotten about the
>>>incident in Sweetwater.  This story line will, no doubt, have to be
>>>dragged out for several weeks.
>>>						Chuck

that guy leeann met in the bar.. that creepy sleeze.. well.. she was drunk and
she passed out..  they never did a thing.. that i remember!  in the morning she
was really concerned if they did anything because she couldn't remember.. the
guy told her that she passed out.. we know he wasn't lying because we saw the
scene when they got to her place.. i thought he was going to have her anyway..
even though she was out cold..

unfortunately we have to hear this dribble for weeks!!   i HATE when soaps do
the court thing!

kevin did take a dna test... 

-- 
Darcy D. Lee
			BI BY NATURE!
darcy@panix.com
cmcl2!panix!darcy
From: doreen@svl.cdc.com (Doreen Matsuzaki)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL: Tuesday
Date: 22 Jul 92 15:59:57 GMT

Well, just like sister Pickle, I too, am suffering from a case of
pre-wedding insomnia, so I stayed up late last night to watch Tuesday's
show hoping it would be amusing.  Too bad I had to suffer through
watching all these men complement and make goo-goo eyes at Icky and
then watch John and Icky make goo-goo eyes at each other.  At least
she admitted to being rusty at Italian.

I did notice that she mentioned something about a child always fearing
for the death of one of their parents.  I wonder/hope if this is any
foreshadowing to her own demise.

Oh well, tis all for now...

-- Papaya Juice

*****************************************************************************
Doreen Matsuzaki  @>-`,-->               | "What makes you think she is
Control Data Systems, Inc.               |  a witch?"
Santa Clara, CA  (408) 496-4164          | "Well, she turned me into a newt."
doreen@duck.svl.cdc.com  or              | "A newt!?"
doreen@svl.cdc.com                       | "... I got better."
*****************************************************************************
From: ggarcia@mipos2.intel.com (Gilbert Garcia)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: other roles
Date: 23 Jul 92 19:26:40 GMT
Reply-To: ggarcia@mipos2.UUCP (Gilbert Garcia)
Organization: Microprocessor Component Group, Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA

In article <1992Jul23.021328.14072@sophia.smith.edu> rippel@sophia.smith.edu (JR) writes:
>
>I've just started seeing a commercial for "Pan Squares", some snack
>food, starring the old Margo!  Donna Reed is also in this commercial.
>Old Margo plays a "modern mother"--too busy to bake cookies like
>Donna, so she feeds her kids these snacks.
>

I've known of 3 different Margos.  Was the one in the commercial the old
Margo (#2) before the current Margo (#1)?  OR was it the Margo (#3) who 
was Margo two Margos ago?!?!

Margo #1 = Ellen Dolan (I know it's not her in the commercial!)
Margo #2 = Hillary Bailey Smith
Margo #3 = Margaret Colin


Just curious,
Gilbie

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
*~*                                     *~*  "You've been hanging around  *~*
*~*                                     *~*         with tramps...        *~*
*~*  Gilbert H. Garcia                  *~*   with cheap clothes and bad  *~*
*~*  e-mail: ggarcia@cory.Berkeley.EDU  *~*        songs to sing."        *~*
*~*          ggarcia@mipos2.intel.com   *~*     From MADONNA to MTV,      *~*
*~*                                     *~*        November, 1991         *~*
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jdale@nsfuvax (JANE)
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN-Is anyone reading?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Mathematics Computer Network, University of Oklahoma
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 01:48:00 GMT

In article <1992Jul25.174930.19090@nic.umass.edu>, laurelh@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Laurel Hellerstein) writes...
>In article <1992Jul23.130936.1972@brandonu.ca> pitzel@brandonu.ca writes:
>>I don't mean to whine, but I am quite upset that people apparently do not take
>>the time to read other people's posts lately.  I know that I mentioned the
>>Erica with strawberry thing long before anyone else posted it, and frankly I
>>wonder if anyone takes time to even read other posts.  Any comments on this
>>would be welcomed.  (I have noticed this with other posts as well, ie. people
>>mentioning things for the "first time" when in reality there had been a post
>>made previously that the individual obviously didn't read).
>>
>>Diane Pitzel
>>Brandon University
>>
> 
> 
>Diane-
> 
>I've been in tears for weeks... I sat down and wrote an article on the
>Strawberry licking immediately after it happened.  Since I run a cable
>station I generally ... if I am not busy ... get to watch AMC out
>of the corner of my eye when I am doing other work!  Only one person
>paid attention to the fact that I posted this tid-bit.  I post all
>the time and no one ever responds to my ideas.  I have been posting
>for several months and have yet to get a welcome as a new poster!
>sniff sniff  whine whine
> 
>Brain-slap to Laurel... its only a notesfile, its only a notesfile
> 
>(and just for that I am not going to post about the softball game
>I went to and saw ... in real life .... Brian Bodine and other stars!)
>-- 
>  %%%%%%%%%%%%---------------------------------------------%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>    Laurel Hellerstein,Ph.D             Laurelh@titan.ucc.umass.edu
>    Manager, Housing Services           (413) 545-4638
>    Cable Network                       FAX (413) 545-2232


                                ***Laurel,
                                     Geez, here I go again... Posting to the
                                     same subject line.  I have also posted a
                                     lot of things in AMC, OLTL, and GH that
                                     were not responded to.  Don't stop! 
                                     Everyone's ideas are interesting (at least
                                     to me) and sometimes the readers are too
                                     busy to respond at that time.  I do most \
                                     responding and posting on Fri. or Sat.  
                                     I have found that if  you post something
                                     negative or different, it will also get a
                                     reply.  

                                  Keep posting -- we always need new  views to
                                     keep us interested!!

                                                                  *** j.
From: 22302LMK@MSU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: SB: Monday's show
Date: 28 Jul 92 13:51:38 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University

Monday's show ran the gamut of emotions. First, Julia and Mason at the restaura
nt was really funny, especially Julias reactions to eating oysters. Then we hav
e the smouldering passion of Angela and Ted. Then the heart wrenching scenes wi
th Jodie and Cruz. I cried right along with Jodie when Cruz told her about BJ.
Now a show that has all that in one day, should not be cancelled.

Lisa
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Spoilers Of Upcoming Stuff
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 14:41:56 GMT

In article <iThor*EZ0@cecily.UUCP> rose@cecily.UUCP (Rose M. Delckum) writes:
>

  [Greg's spoilers deleted -- to conserve bandwidth only.]

  [Much of Guavita's rantings also deleted -- for the same reason.]

>Kim doesn't want Shane to know about her engagement.  Shane doesn't want
>anyone to know he can walk some.  I am so sick and tired of all the secrets
>around here!  Everyone lies!  It's incredible!  If I lived in Salem I 
>wouldn't trust anyone and would become a paranoid raving lunatic!  (Hey!
>Whaddya mean I'm on my way?!? :-)  ).  Okay.  Breathe, kiddo, breathe.
>Hey Vince, can I have that cookie now?  I really need a chocolate fix.
>Everyone keeps talking about how things are looking up, but good Lord (I
>avoided using a stronger, more blasphemous phrase there...venal sin ya know)
>this is not progress people!  This is retreads of old plots.  The least
>they could do is hire back all the good actors they fired/alienated
>and let them do their old lines over again, instead of us having to
>watch second rate imitators do it!

Hey, there, Guavita...you breathing yet?  :-)  Good.  Okay...I've been
one of the people saying that the show's been getting better since 
Sherri took over as head writer.  And, in some basic ways, it has.
One of the main things she did was get more of the actors interacting
with each other...everybody's not going around on their own little 
thing anymore never noticing anyone else.  Another thing that's 
happened is that they mention dead/gone characters a lot more.  I, for
one, really appreciate that sort of thing.

However, in the past...oh, I don't know...week or two?...the show has
become very stale for me.  It's just plain boring.  It's not nearly as
bad as it was...say...3 months ago but I find it so hard to remember
what happened in each episode within 1/2 hour of finishing it.  
Yesterday, for example, I watched the show around 8 o'clock and then 
as I was getting ready to go to bed at about 12:30 I suddenly realized
I hadn't watched the show.  Then, it occured to me that I had rewound
the tape, so I must have watched the show!  But, I could not think of
one single thing that had happened.  I remember, now, that Larry and
Viv were on so this is very distressing to me...I love Larry and Viv 
so if they are being boring, it's a sad commentary.

>Pissed off Shrubbery

Bored Lemonly Citrus.

| \____ ----- ____/           |  "Let's just be friends -- friends   |
|      ( o o )                |  who never talk or see each other."  |
|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    |      - David Letterman, 7-22-92      |
|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! |       peea224@hermes.chpc.utexas.edu |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: alangend@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Andrea D Langenderfer)
Subject: Re: DOOL:  All-Time Poll!
Organization: The Ohio State University
   4.The last Melissa Anderson and sister Sarah                    character
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 17:22:09 GMT

>> Favorite Episode or Scene
>> 1.Alice helping BO/Hope
>> 2.Alice melting helping anyone escape from jail
>> 3.Bo and Steve's friendship/male bonding
>> 4.Steve and Marcus friendship/male bonding
>> 5.Tom Horton the Poet at the Beat Bar with Calilope
>>
>> Most Hated Episode or Scene
>> 1.Hope and Ernesto T.'s(death) disappearce
>> 2.The prime time special that bite!
>> 3.That Frankie was Caly brother, She sent him to Salem. That didn't fit with
    Frankie and Max being homeless, why didn't he write home for $$. And Carly
    could not have known she would bump into Justin/Adrienne in Tahiti
> 4.When Melissa use to dance with Lars/Pete her ballet, ugggh!
>> 5.Roman and the playdough, please!
>>
>> Favorite Song
>> 1.Friends and Lovers-Gloria Loring
>> 2.Wind Beneath My Wings-Charolette Ross
>> 3.Goodbye my Friend for Steve/Kayla
>> 4.Lady in RED
>> 5.
>>
>> Character/Actor You'd Most Like to See Return
>> 1. Leann Huntly-Anna Dimera to kick Carrie's butt
>> 2. other than that I am afraid the writers might slay my memory of a
character. But saying that they don't.
>> 3.Hope to take away Shawn D.
>> 4.Mike Horton, but this time get him a woman-forget it, they already can't
find a women or story for Marcus, doubt it would work.
>> 5.Mary Beth Evens as Kayla, but that will never happen.

>> And this is my first poll, so sorry if it sounds lame :-)
>> and of course, any comments/criticisms/suggestions are welcome!
I think you did a fine job, it really made me think about the show, you did say
all time, right? Cause some of my answers go way back.No, it was not lame! I
enjoyed it.
>> is rmdelc01@ulkyvm.louisville.edu  if that doesn't work, try my sweetie's
>> account, cfcohe01@ulkyvm as a last resort.
Sorry, I accidently sent this to the board instead of you and my editor won't 
let me go up and change the adress.
>> The Madly Polling Shrubbery
Thanxx for the poll it brought back some things, I haven't thought of in years.
Andrea
>> --
>> Rose M. Delckum
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re:B&B - this week
From: R.D.Lynn@massey.ac.nz (R.D. Lynn)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 03:42:08 GMT
Organization: Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
X-Reader: NETNEWS/PC Version 2c

---------------------------- Article Seperator ----------------------------
In article: <1682CBE24.M21760@mwvm.mitre.org> M2176@mwvm.mitre.org (Linda)
writes:

>In article <92202.165414MZ6@psuvm.psu.edu>
>>MZ6@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
 
>>
>>In article <1992Jul20.180405.6901@dmntor.UUCP>, toni@dmntor.UUCP (Toni Spurgeon)
>>says:
>>
--- STUFF DELETED ---
>>
>>Before Ridge and Caroline could even try to reconcile, Caroline was
>>brutally raped.  Caroline couldn't communicate this to Ridge,
>>so she turned to Thorne for support.  It was this gratitude that
 
>Did Brook have anything to do with this rape?  This happened
>right before I started watching B&B.  I have heard that Brook
>was responsible for the rape - she set it up or something like
>that.  Is this true?  If so, what happened?
 
>
>>Mike
 
>Linda
 
Well Linda, since I'm closer to the event than the U.S. watchers (we're
only up to the October 1989 episodes), I'll attempt to answer your question.
Brooke had nothing to with the rape. She and Caroline were having a quiet 
drink when a guy approached the table where they were sitting. He seemed 
friendly and interested in Caroline. So Brooke excused herself and went home.
The bloke walked Caroline to her apartment, then forced himself into the 
apartment and raped Caroline. 

Caroline rang Brooke to say she was in trouble. Brooke rushed over to help
her then brought Caroline back to Brooke's home, where she was allowed to
recover in a caring environment. Thorne managed to find out that Caroline
had been raped and was staying with Brooke. He helped her recover, but told 
Brooke not to tell Ridge what had happened to Caroline. Caroline was very
thankful for what Thorne had done, and as a result, married him more out
of a sense of gratitude than love. When Ridge sent Caroline a letter telling
her how much he loved her, Brooke took the letter, but as I remember was 
going to give it to Caroline, until Thorne told her to destroy it. She
couldn't destroy the letter, but didn't give the letter to the Caroline until
the day of her marriage to Thorne. And the rest is history!

So, IMHO (or is it IMNSHO), Brooke was not the slut that some have made out.
Sure she wanted Ridge, but sure hasn't every woman except his mother and
sisters done the same?

Rob Lynn
Organization: Junior, Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
From: peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL:roger lombard, etc.
Date: 24 Jul 92 15:33:07 GMT
Article-I.D.: chpc.1992Jul24.153307.3886
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC

In article <QePpbk600VB9A=yV1G@andrew.cmu.edu> jb93+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jeffrey Todd Blankenship) writes:
>joanna writes:
>
>>Ahh...so then, you don't love the Lombards...it's just Roger?  I can 
>>almost understand this.  Roger can certainly add some interest to 
>>things but Stella (who was on LALaw recently, BTW) and Jesse can both
>>take a long walk off a short pier as far as I'm concerned. 
>
>ok, ok.  you've made me do some soul searching and your right, it isn't
>the lombards, it's roger lombard.  you know, i think i like the way you
>think.  i have been defending brian for a while now, i'm glad i'm not
>the only one in his corner.  i have to disagree on the vern thing
>though.  sure, the man is a putz, but look at those 'burns.  i say he
>has to stay, simply because of the haircut!

Hmmm...well...I'm glad you like the way I think and that you can admit 
that I'm right about the Lombard clan...I usually am right, BTW, just 
ask Timmy.  :-)  However (!), no way in the world is Vern ever gonna 
make it onto my list of people I'd like to see stick around Salem.  In
fact, I do believe I really would be quite happy if he went to check 
on the printing presses and got a bit pressed!  :-)

>anxiously waiting,

Well...sorry to keep you waiting just so's I could disagree with you.

>jeff

Joanna.

| \____ ----- ____/           |  "Let's just be friends -- friends   |
|      ( o o )                |  who never talk or see each other."  |
|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    |      - David Letterman, 7-22-92      |
|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! |       peea224@hermes.chpc.utexas.edu |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps