HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nadusume@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Nagendra Adusumelli)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Ind Vs RSA 5th 1 day
Date: 15 Dec 92 17:50:37 GMT
Organization: Ohio University CS Dept,. Athens

Plan file generated by 'Dougie', the cricket scorer.
For a realtime, full screen (insert more hype here) score update get the
dougie source from ford.ee.up.ac.za via anonymous ftp, the latest version is
pub/dougie-0.0.tar.Z      - Enjoy!

To connect to this host, use
dougie oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu 2589

     South Africa vs India, 5th D/N, Springbok Park, Bloemfontein, 15/12/92
              South Africa                               India
Hudson   * not out             30 ( 23)  Jadeja     c McMilla b Donald   9 ( 25)
Wessels  - not out             19 ( 39)  Raman      c McMilla b Matthe  16 ( 46)
Kirsten                                  Prabhakar  run out Callaghan   36 ( 57)
Rhodes                                   Azhar      not out             86 (106)
Callaghan                                Tendulkar  b DVilliers         32 ( 52)
Cronje                                   Shastri    not out             21 ( 18)
McMillan                                 Kapil                                  
Richardsn                                Amre                                   
Matthews                                 Yadav                                  
Donald                                   Kumble                                 
DVilliers                                Srinath                                
Extras  (W: 0 N: 1 B: 3 LB: 0)  4        Extras  (W: 1 N: 2 B: 0 LB: 4)  7
Total   (Ov:  5.3 RR: 9.64)    53 / 0    Total   (Ov: 50.0 RR: 4.14)   207 / 4 
             O  M  R  Wi Wd Nb                        O  M  R  Wi Wd Nb 
Callaghan    4  0  22  1  0  0           Prabhakar    0  0   4  0  0  1
Cronje       6  0  20  0  0  0           Kapil        4  0  20  0  0  0
McMillan    10  0  59  0  0  0           Kumble    *  0  0   0  0  0  0
Matthews    10  1  37  1  0  1           Srinath   -  1  0  11  0  0  0
Donald      10  2  36  1  1  1            
DVilliers   10  1  29  1  0  0            
                      current run rate 3.78, required 4.3
-- 
"The problem you are experiencing is  |  "To be sure of hitting the target, 
 not with the network nor with the    |  shoot first and, whatever you hit, 
 station.  Please adjust your set."   |  call it the target." 
More ramblings from: nadusume@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: score WI/Pak
Date: 16 Dec 1992 22:19:37 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


Apologies, the running score of the 5th ODI has disappeared.

SA beat India by eight wickets with 16 balls to spare. Hudson was 108 not out.



South Africa vs India, 4th D/N, Wanderers, Johannesburg, 13/12/92
SA win by 6 wickets with 10 balls remaining. Man of the match Jonty Rhodes.

Wessels won the toss, India batting.
Kapil has been injured slightly when batting. He is bowling from a
shortened run since his 7th over. He left the field after 9 overs.
Callaghan run out by the smallest margin ever. His bat was less than
an inch out when Jadeja broke the wickets with a direct throw

         South Africa                          India                 
Hudson c Azhar b Kumble     22 (56) | Jadeja    lbw Callaghan         18 (60)
Wessels c Jadeja b Srinath  45 (96) | Raman     b Donald               0 (16)
Kirsten lbw Srinath         21 (48) | Amre      lbw Donald             2 ( 9)
Rhodes                      42 (56) | Azhar     c Richardsn b Matthews 49 (84)
Callaghan run out Jadeja    12 (27) | Tendulkar c McMillan b Donald    21 (44)
Cronje                      11 ( 8) | Kapil     c Richardsn b Matthews 18 (25)
McMillan                            | Shastri   c McMillan b DeVillier 17 (32)
Richardson                          | Srinath   c Rhodes b McMillan     3 ( 5)
Matthews                            | More      run out Rhodes          2 ( 7)
Donald                              | Prabhakar not out                 5 ( 9)
DeVilliers                          | Kumble    not out                 7 (13)
Extras  N:1 W:2 B:  LB:9    12      | Extras    N:2  W:11 B:  LB:6     19
Total   W:3 RR:            156      | Total     W:9 RR:               161
Overs: 48.2                         | Overs:    50
              O  M  R Wi Nb Wd      |            O  M  R Wi Nb Wd
Kapil         9  0 23  0  0  0      | Donald     10 0 27  3  0  5
Prabhakar     8  0 24  0  0  1      | DeVilliers 10 2 24  1  0  1
Kumble        9  1 33  1  0  0      | Matthews   10 0 33  2  2  1
Srinath     9.2  1 39  2  1  1      | McMillan   10 0 39  1  0  4 
Tendulkar     3  1  4  0  0  0      | Cronje      5 0 15  0  0  0
Shastri      10  1 33  0  0  0      | Callaghan   5 0 17  1  0  0
From: sdas@paul.rutgers.edu (Souripriya Das)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: SA 3/122 after 42 overs: IND 9/161 in 50 overs
Keywords: from "finger pieter@ford.ee.up.ac.za"
Date: 13 Dec 92 20:18:49 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

South Africa vs India, 4th D/N, Wanderers, Johannesburg, 13/12/92
Wessels won the toss, India batting.
Kapil has been injured slightly when batting. He is bowling from a
shortened run since his 7th over. He left the field after 9 overs.

         South Africa                          India
Hudson c Azhar b Kumble     22 (56) | Jadeja    lbw Callaghan         18 (60)
Wessels c Jadeja b Srinath  45 (96) | Raman     b Donald               0 (16)
Kirsten lbw Srinath         21 (48) | Amre      lbw Donald             2 ( 9)
Rhodes                      19 (28) | Azhar     c Richardsn b Matthews 49 (84)
Callaghan                   10 (21) | Tendulkar c McMillan b Donald    21 (44)
Cronje                              | Kapil     c Richardsn b Matthews 18 (25)
McMillan                            | Shastri   c McMillan b DeVillier 17 (32)
Richardson                          | Srinath   c Rhodes b McMillan     3 ( 5)
Matthews                            | More      run out Rhodes          2 ( 7)
Donald                              | Prabhakar not out                 5 ( 9)
DeVilliers                          | Kumble    not out                 7 (13)
Extras  N:  W:  B:  LB:3     3      | Extras    N:2  W:11 B:  LB:6     19
Total   W:3 RR:            122      | Total     W:9 RR:               161
Overs: 42                           | Overs:    50
              O  M  R Wi Nb Wd      |            O  M  R Wi Nb Wd
Kapil         9  ? 23  0  0  0      | Donald     10 0 27  3  0  5
Prabhakar     8  0 24  0  0  0      | DeVilliers 10 2 24  1  0  1
Kumble        6  1 15  1  0  0      | Matthews   10 0 33  2  2  1
Srinath       6  1 21  2  0  0      | McMillan   10 0 39  1  0  4
Tendulkar     3  ?  4  0  0  0      | Cronje      5 0 15  0  0  0
Jadeja                              | Callaghan   5 0 17  1  0  0
Shastri      10  1 32  0  0  0
-- 
===============================================================================
_______					EMAIL:		sdas@paul.rutgers.edu
|                               o
|_____  ______  _      _  _ __  _	TELEPHONE:	908-878-1848 (home)
      | |    |  |      |  |/    |		  	908-932-0606 (office)
      | |    |  |      |  |     |			908-932-5172 (CoRE-516)
|_____| |____|  |______|  |     |	US MAIL ADDR:	BPO 29901, P.O.Box 1119
							Piscataway, NJ 08855.
							(Buell Apt# 326)
===============================================================================
Organization: Doctoral student, Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:29:18 -0500 
From: Jayashankar Swaminathan <jsdf+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: India lost to SAfrica in 5th ODI...

Hi Umesh
      I fully agree with you when you say that Kapil should open the
innings , more often than not he is never used as a batsman in the one
-dayers. Knowing that he is such a fine striker of the ball, thereis no
doubt that there is some thing seriously wrong with Indian captains
think.
-Jayashankar

  Name       : Jayashankar.M.Swaminathan
  Phone(Res) : (412)-362-9112     
  Email      : msj@cs.cmu.edu
               jsdf@andrew.cmu.edu
From: kaushik@dvorak.amd.com (Kaushik Chhotani)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Ind-RSA 5TH ODI Scores
Keywords: Who won the 5th ODI?
Date: 16 Dec 92 18:47:17 GMT
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Austin, Texas

Hi everyone:

The last score I saw on r.s.c. was India 207/4 in 50 overs
and RSA 87/0 in 28 overs. After that there were no postings
on the net. 

It looks like most of you can finger Pieter or Dr. Rao and 
get the scores, but that facility is available to the guys 
who are in school. 'finger' or 'ftp' commands are not
allowed from companies such as ours, so if you can be 
considerate enough to post it on the net as before, we 
could keep ourselves informed.

Thanks a lot and hoping to get the latest score and result
for the 5th ODI.

Kaushik
 


-- 
 _______ **** #include <std_disclaimer.h> ****         
 \____  |Advanced * KAUSHIK CHHOTANI            email: kaushik@dvorak.amd.com
 /|   | |Micro    * 5204 E.Ben White M/S 520 Austin TX 78741 *(512)462-6245(W)
| |___| |Devices  * 5702 Westslope Drive Austin TX 78731     *(512)454-3221(H)
From: bmohan@pepper.rutgers.edu (bulusu mohan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Target setting
Date: 11 Dec 92 22:15:58 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

Azhar's decision to chase a target worked in the 3rd ODI. Both teams seem to
be bad at setting targets, which, IMO, needs a naturally aggressive and
positive approach (especially in the later half of the innings) as oppossed to
chasing one where aggression (even the desperate type) is forced on the batting
side.

Mohan
From: sanwar@watarts.uwaterloo.ca (Sajid Anwar)
Subject: Re: PAKISTAN ARE...
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 16:55:19 GMT

After their crushing defeat at the hands of WI and Australia, Pakistani team
should be sent home. And all excessively patriotic fans should stop posting
articles with stupid titles like "Pakistan Murdered WA".
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: "Manoj K. Jain" <mjain@silver.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Who is South Africa's WicketKeeper?
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:41:09 GMT


I thought that Richardson was keeping for SA, but since he is bowling
in the 6th one-day, it must be someone else. Hudson?

Thanks,
-- Manoj
From: allanc@cs.su.oz.au (Restless Wanderer)
Subject: Re: Coming World Series
Reply-To: allanc@cluster.cs.su.oz (Restless Wanderer)
Organization: Basser Dept of Computer Science, University of Sydney, Australia
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 04:25:18 GMT

In article <BywK1L.1CF@max.physics.sunysb.edu> waring@max.physics.sunysb.edu (Martin Waring) writes:
>In article <1992Dec5.005708.12619@athena.mit.edu> wasi@athena.mit.edu (Wasiuddin A. Wahid) writes:
>>Now, Pakistan wins the same Cup yet no one wants to give them the credit.
>>
>>Can someone PLEASE tell why ?
>>


Plenty of people recognise the Pakistan WC win.At least 23people from
the team.
Sarcasm off,I don't think any one disputes the validity of their victory.
But ,that was a few years ago,so I presume a lot of people are waiting to
see the "champs" fall.
There are so many good cricketers out there,even untapped sources in Aus.
That to tag any one team is gonna be real hard after this series.

I reckon they should all be played at the MCG,so us in Sydney can see
all the game.Another reason is the 74,000 * $20 min woould be a big
incentive.

allanc

******************************************************************************
* Allan Creighton           "There are important matters to be resolved here *
* Dept of Computer Science   and the fear of being hanged on a democratic    *
* University of Sydney       gallows will delay me until next spring"        *
******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: NZ To Get Third Umpire
From: david@datamark.co.nz (David Rowland)
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 23:38:03 GMT
Organization: Datamark International Ltd.


The New Zealand Cricket Council has announced that it would follow
South Africas steps and use a third umpire to use television replys
for difficult calls.

These umpires will be used in the up comming tours by Pakistan and
Australia.

--
+---------------------+--------------------------------------------------+
| David Rowland       | The British are using New Zealanders.  They must |
| Datamark Intl Ltd   | really mean business !                           |
| Wellington          |      -  General Rommel During Northern African   |
| NEW ZEALAND         |         Campaign WWII.                           |
+---------------------+--------------------------------------------------+
From: jawad@ecst.csuchico.edu (Jawad Ali)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: no best teams in cricket
Date: 12 Dec 92 00:01:07 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico
NNTP-Posting-Host: cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu

In article <1992Dec11.185940.27392@news2.cis.umn.edu> suraj@microbe.med.umn.edu (Suraj Muley) writes:
>i recently read an article saying that pakistan was the best team in
>one day cricket today. i do not approve of this concept of best teams
	:
	:
>etc. as this is at best childish and rather redundant.

Soon we will even get tired of these meta-discussions (discussions about
the best team/world champions/world cup/bowl ... discussions).  And someday
someone will comlain about my starting this meta-discussion in a meta-meta-
discussion.  And recursion will take hold.

But before that happens :-) will sombody please tell us the ball-by-ball
of the last over(s) of THE match (there was only one this week :-)

j n a.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi)
Subject: Re: Problems with RR and SM
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 04:19:08 GMT

Re: problems with Pakistan's batting lineup at WSC and Saeed Anwar. 

I suspect Miandad is going to try a few things during the NZ series
which btw has provided a re-grouping chance to Pakistan for the WSC. 
My feeling is that Pakistan has to find a balanced side for the OD
games. Jawad is of course right: the stats for Saeed Anwar are quite
bad. But I have seen him bat and I have a feeling that he is going to
turn things round. Besides the man tells great jokes. There's this one
about Malik Bussa who goes...hmmm, I think I'll save that for a
private moment when I can speak Punjabi. 

--shamim
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: rakesh@mame.mu.OZ.AU (Rakesh DESAI)
Subject: Weekend One Dayers - Comments
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 22:11:32 GMT

World Champs Pak had double header this weekend and it was not a good
weekend for them.

Sat 12/Dec/92
WI made 7/177 in 42 overs.  Richardson made 77 n.o.  Because of overcast
sky and some showers conditions were difficult.  Initially WI
struggled.  At 34 overs mark rain arrived and match was stopped for a
while and target reduced to 42 overs.  WI put in some quick fired runs.
Pak for their effort ran themselves out.  It was clear case of stealing
a defeat out of the jaws of victory.  Needing 40 runs in last 10 overs
with nothing to get excited about as 7 wkts were in hand.  Despite bad
fielding in the first half WI managed to recover in these last overs and
created 5 Pak run outs.  Only person who was pleased with this 5 run
outs was Ian Chapple.  In 1975 World Cup finals Australia lost to WI
because of 5 run outs.  Chapplie thought that no other team will equal
that achievement (!).

This part of story was obvious from most of the previously posted
scorecards.  The most pleasing sight of the match was the rapport
between WI and Pak players.  When Miandad called Waqar to bowl last
over, Richardson pointed out that his quota is over.  Miandad put his
arm around Richardson's shoulder (which in subcontinent has sign of
friendly gesture but here in Aus it has different connotation :-}) and
had a friendly chat.  Later Miandad called Mustaq to bowl the last over
as he agreed with Richardson.  After WI finished their innings
Richardson and Miandad went chatting as if they were teammates.  Despite
the on field rivalry, this pleasant friendly approach was pleasing.

13/Dec/92

Again rain followed Adelaide and match was started with the fact that it
will be 47 overs.  Pak batted slowly in the beginning.  Tim May managed
sharp turn from the patches on two occasions and managed wickets of Raja
and Miandad.  In the end came onlslaught from Wasim Akram, lusty
hitting. 2 towering sixes.  One off the bowling of McDermott straight
out of ground that too on longest boundaries of Adelaide oval.  36 runs
off 15 balls.  Inzamam also had good share with 60 n.o. with few lovely
boundaries.  Only problem with him is his running between wicket is
really bad.  He is very sluggish in his approach and needs a lot of
improvement in that dept.

Aus had good start and target of 195 was not much of a problem after
that.

Enough for today
bye
rakesh
--
************************************************************************
*   Rakesh Desai, Mech & Manf Eng, Uni of Melbourne, Parkville,Vic 3052*
*   email: rakesh@ecr.mu.oz.au or rakesh@mame.mu.oz.au * (03) 344 6728 *
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ij27@sol.acs.unt.edu (Gaddamanugu Vishwa Prasad)
Subject: Oh! What is happening to the WORLD CHAMPIONS!
Organization: University of North Texas
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:22:33 GMT


What`s happening to the WORLD CHAMPIONS!

They are now being battered by the ex-WC Windies, and Aussies.

It's high time time for pakistan(is) to know what is happening and play
to thier reputation.  Otherwise they might give hard time to the over
patriotic pakistani netters, who would have nothing else to write.

Wishing you the best Pakistan (Cricket Team)

Thanx

Vishwa

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: tripunit@algol.cs.psu.edu (Mahesh V Tripunitara)
Subject: Re: lowest six 
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 18:44:06 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.185807.2696@news.uakron.edu> murali@emily.polymer.uakron.edu (Murali Cotah) writes:
>Keywords: 
>
>>what in your
>opinion is the lowest six you've ever seen?
>Sudhama
>>
>Krishnamachari - world cup Finals - the best i have seen

David Gower...six against B. Arun (went absolutely flat and hit the
advertisement boards between square leg & mid wicket).

Mahesh.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: yeff@Apple.COM (jeff soesbe)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Women's NCAA Tourn - Final Four Semifinal Results
Date: 18 Dec 92 19:16:42 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA


Well, it's Stanford v. UCLA.  Surprise, surprise...


Final Four Semifinal Results
----------------------------
(at "The Pit" on the campus of University of New Mexico in
Albuquerque, New Mexico)


#2 Stanford defeated #3 Long Beach State 15-10, 15-12, 6-15, 15-9

#1 UCLA defeated #5 Florida 15-12, 15-12, 15-10


On Saturday, December 19 at 7 PM, it's #2 Stanford v. #1 UCLA for the
championship!!  In the Bay Area, the game will be broadcast on 90.1 FM
(KZSU) starting at 5:45 pm Saturday.


Here's an article from the San Francisco Chronicle on the game
(reprinted without permission):

"Freshman Cary Wendell and four-time All-American Bev Oden each had 21
kills as Stanford defeated Long Beach State, 15-10, 15-12, 6-15, 15-9,
in the semifinals of the NCAA Women's Volleyball Championships.

The Cardinal (31-2) will meet two-time defending champion UCLA for the
championship tomorrow night.

The Bruins, who defeated Florida, 15-12, 15-12, 15-10, are trying to
become the first school ever to win three straight women's volleyball
titles.

'Our group of seniors want to win it pretty badly,' said Cardinal
coach Don Show, whose team is looking for its first NCAA championship
and has been runner-up three times.  'It wasn't the prettiest match a
lot of the time, but we are at the door.  Now we have to kick it
down.'

Stanford, ranked No. 2 in the nation throughout the season behing UCLA
(33-0), dominated a Long Beach State team that was ranked No. 3 and
considered the best offensive team in the country."


Go Stanford!!

ps - anyone have the score of the Florida/Kentucky regional semifinal
game??

pps - I heard the All-American team was announced (and the All-Pac 10
team as well).  Anybody have details?

jef
------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Soesbe
Internet: yeff@apple.com	AppleLink : YEFF
"You are quite right to suspect that monkeys who are solely
out for a good time do not make ideal guests..."
------------------------------------------------------------
My opinions are probably not Apple's opinions.
------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
From: dyoung@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Donn C Young)
Subject: Blocking
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 15:04:44 GMT

The recent thread on actions over the opponent's court, either blocking or 
attacking has gotten somewhat confused. Please folks, get a USVBA Rulebook 
(call 1-800-WE-SPIKE, it's $4.95) it covers all your questions. Howsomever, 
the term "attack block" is a misnomer in that you can't "attack" and 
"block" at the same time; you're doing one or the other. Remember, if the 
ball's completely on your opponent's side of the net, all you can do is 
block; it is illegal to attack a ball completely on their side (Rule 8, 
Art. 11). An "attack block" is a block, that because of your penetration 
over the net, occurs over your opponents court. One example is a "stuff 
block" where you are able to block the ball straight down over your 
opponents court. This can be done by "roofing" your opponent - extending 
your hands/arms almost horizontally over an opponent who is making a 
pitiful attempt to hit a worthless set. Blocks occuring on your side of 
the court include plain jane blocks, soft blocks, and down blocks. 

The ball may carom off your hands/arms, but cannot be re-directed with 
hand or finger action without being called for a throw.

Here are FAQ questions related to blocking:

36. What's the difference between a block and attack hit over the opponents
    court?
    Sometimes a blocker can legally be very aggressive on a block, flicking
    the hands, reaching out and tapping the ball with their fingers, etc., 
    in an effort to prevent the ball from crossing the net (as well as making
    the block difficult to dig).  What distinguishes an attack is the arm
    reaching back behind the head as in a spike and swinging forward. Here 
    the intent in my judgement is not to prevent the ball from crossing the
    net, but to drive the ball into the other court.  (I dismiss such 
    outcries as "the player did prevent the ball from crossing....")  If the
    hands start in front of the head and the arm is never cocked, then
    it is a block.

51. Can I contact the ball over the opponent's court?
    Only when blocking their attempt to direct the ball into your
    court [8-11] [8-14-f]. You cannot attack a ball completely on
    your opponents side of the net.

52. Can I reach over the net to block the ball?
    Sho nuff! [8-11] [8-14] Some older folks might remember in days of 
    old when your hands could not legally break the plane of the net.

Wishing all a happy holiday season and better blocking!

Donn Young
dyoung@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu