HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: moore@iastate.edu (Brian J Moore)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Why go to 3.1 if 2.0 works
Date: 12 Apr 92 16:59:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: pv34c1.moore.703097972
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA

In <1992Apr12.060641.15373@muddcs.claremont.edu> jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim) writes:

>Incidently, after playing with WPS for half a week, IMHO the interface
>for OS/2 is *more* intuitive than the Mac, and much more than Windows.
>Everything is an object, and you can perform actions on them accordingly.
>Reports from OS/2 users indicate that at first, nearly everybody hates
>the new interface.  But after a few days of use, everybody loves it.

Great, now I have to learn 2 user interfaces, windows and OS/2, and infinitely
many more if you count VDM's.  The mouse button thing takes a while to get used
to, at least it did for me between the Amiga and Windows.
-- 
   ________________________________________________________________________
  /                                  /                                    /
 /  Brian J. Moore                  /                  moore@iastate.edu /
/__________________________________/____________________________________/
From: skelly@bucknell.edu (sean kelly `94)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: SBPro driver bug (?)
Date: 17 Apr 92 18:02:52 GMT
Organization: Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pa.

I'm using the Sound Blaster Pro drivers for Win 3.1 (Downloaded from the Microsoft BBS) and I'm running into some problems with running DOS programs.  Every time I load a DOS app (full-screen or windowed) I get a message saying "Unable to play sound - soundblaster is in use by another application."  I assume the 'other application' is Windows, but loading a DOS windows shouldn't send a message to the Sound card?!  The card is set at 220, IRQ2, DMA1.  Is Dos trying to take hole of the interrupt or something



?  Is there a setting I can put in one of the .INI files or should I change the IRQ port?  By the way, the DOS app does run, the message is just getting on my nerves...

-Sean
From: che358w@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: DJ 500, TTF & W4W 2.0 Equation Edit ?
Date: 14 Apr 92 07:07:33 GMT
Organization: Computer Centre, Monash University, Australia

Hi,
  I want to grizzle about the deskjet 500 support for Win 3.1 too.  One of the
reasons that I bought 3.1 was I thought that I caould install the true type
fonts for the equation editor in W4W 2.0. When you look in the font manager
in control panel the fonts Fences(true type) and MT Extra(true type) are there
but they don't dsiplay in sample. In w4w the font menu doesn't show either of
these fonts and when you start up the equation editor it declares that these
fonts are missing.

Has anyone got an answer to this problem ?

Thanks.

Samantha Lane
CHE358W@vaxc.cc.monash.au.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: mwizard@rigel.cs.pdx.edu (Craig R. Nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: ET4000 (800x600x256) not loading properly ?
Date: 12 Apr 92 08:43:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: pdxgate.5308

Hi all.

	Well, I got the ET4000 drivers (after everyone was nice to point
me in the direction of where they reside) but now I have a small problem.
The reason I wanted the drivers was to run 800x600x256.  All the video
modes (including 800x600x256 (Large Fonts)) run OK. I, being a picky person,
would like the one mode that doesn't load right.  Small font-256 color
just initializes the video screen, then throws me back to the DOS prompt.
Anoyone out there run into a similar problem ?  1024x768x256 is nice but it's
just to damn small :)

Thanks in advance for the help.


=============================================================
|  Craig Nelson , OO Programmer    mwizard@eecs.cs.pdx.edu  | 
|  CC Software, Inc.		   Beaverton Oregon  97005  |
=============================================================
From: cj00+@andrew.cmu.edu (Carl B Jabido)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Why I'm sticking with Windows
Date: 15 Apr 92 16:07:20 GMT
Organization: Freshman, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Excerpts from netnews.comp.windows.ms: 15-Apr-92 Re: Why I'm sticking
with W.. by Donald A. Lehn@helix.nih 
>Another perspective on why to stick to Windows.  I have 5 IBM Model 80
>PS/2's with 2 mb ram and 80 mb hard drives.  These machines are perfectly
>adequate Windows platforms.  To upgrade to OS/2 2.0 for these machines
>would require 4 mb ram ($600.00) and at least another 80 mb hard disk
>($800.00).  [PS/2 upgrades are not cheap.]  For the same $1400.00 I can
>buy a 386 clone with svga graphics, 80 mb hard drive, 4 mb memory and
>with DOS 5.0 and Windows included in the bundle. 
> 
>Although I wont have the "true" software multitasking of OS/2, I will have
>the Windows, more than adequate flavor of multitasking, and, with 2x
>the number of computers, be able to 'multitask' the human interface.

Ah yes.  You do make a good point.  But for those of us who already have
a 386/40 8 megs of memory, 300 meg hard drive, token ring network, and
SVGA card Windows just doesn't make it.  At CMU, we have the option of
installing Mach which is a version of Unix written here at CMU. 
Depending on the setup, I've seen PC's running X Windows with speed
comparable to a DEC 3100.  Not bad.  I've seen the same systems crawling
when under Windows.  Maybe it's just because of Dos.  I haven't really
played with OS/2 2.0 that much, but I have played with it enough to know
how stable and how much more efficient it is than Dos/Windows.
  For us with the "power" systems, I'd say jump off the Dos boat and
switch to something new.  The "power" system you buy maybe really good
under Dos/Windows, but if you see that same system under a modern
operating system, you'll see it in a new light.

Carl Jabido
cj00@andrew.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: arakins@iastate.edu (Andrew R Akins)
Subject: .WAV files
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 18:19:42 GMT

  Now that I got Win 3.1, and I can have Multimedia, I got
a question:

  Anybody know where I can FTP some .WAV files?

  Thanks...

-- Andy Akins
   Iowa State University
   arakins@iastate.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Fax Number for Authors of QVTNET
From: tfarmer@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Farmer)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 22:21:16 GMT
Organization: Datamark International Ltd.

Does anyone know the fax number of QPC software, the authors of
WinQVTNet?

Apparently some of our clients want it so we need to speak to them
site-licensing and other such things.

An email address would be even better.

-- 
Thomas Farmer      | tfarmer@cavebbs.gen.nz | I need an apartment!
Datamark Intl Ltd  | tfarmer@datamark.co.nz | +64-4-233-8186 (work)
Technical Writer & Dos M/Wrangler           | Love is a warm beagle.
From: swyatt@bach.udel.edu (Stephen L Wyatt)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Boo Hiss MicroSoft
Keywords: Marketing Scam
Date: 8 Apr 92 17:57:03 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

I have a question- why is some people bitching about acouple of hours
or days when you've been waiting acouple of YEARS?  Jeesh, hold your pants
on... Like a few days really makes a difference.  If you run your life around
the windows 3.1 product, you've got a real problem.
From: jliukkon@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Juha-Matti Liukkonen)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: HELP!--How do you delete files in AMI PRO 2.0?
Date: 8 Apr 92 19:58:16 GMT
Distribution: comp.windows.ms
Organization: University of Helsinki

In <1992Apr7.234758.25726@ra.msstate.edu> dmd2@ra.msstate.edu (David Dumas) writes:

>How in the world do you delete file names in AMI PRO?  I have gone in and
>deleted the files with the File Management option from the DOCS directory, but
>I can't get rid of the file names of the files that I have created and saved
>from the File Menu.  They are listed at the bottom of the menu after the Exit
>command.  How do you get rid of these?

>The files no longer exist because I can click on these names and nothing comes
>up.  They are just names.

Interesting - I just tried this just to be sure (I have Ami Pro open as
I write this) and I have no problems, nor do I recollect ever having...
You have something strange happening inside your system... When I delete
a file it is *gone* from the list box as well...
-- 
_--__----__---___---___--____/ Juha Liukkonen - jliukkon@cc.helsinki.fi \___/
_-___-____-___-_-___-___-___/ University  of Helsinki, Finland, Earth,  /o__o
_-___---__-___-_-___-___-__/ Department of Paranormal Investigations:  / (..)\
_--__-_____---___---___--_/ " 01000001 01001001  0100010  01010011 "   \  -- /
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: bbrown@infonode.ingr.com (Bailey Brown)
Subject: Re: Best win3.1 upgrade strategy with NDW
Keywords: win3.1 & NDW
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 16:44:50 GMT

tim@qed.cts.com (Tim Capps) writes:

>ulisses@ldgo.columbia.edu (ulisses mello) writes:

>> However, I want a painless upgrade (like everyone else). What would be
>> the best upgrade strategy to keep the groups intact, use NDW as file manager
>> and program manager and install win3.1 from the scratch ? I wouldn't like
>> to spend hours reconfiguring everything again.

>Here's what I did:

>Install 3.1 using the 'custom' install option.  Pretty much let it do what
>it wanted (except touch my AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS files, of course,
>as them's fightin' words).  I told it NOT to scan for applications.

>When I got to the point where you re-start windows, I did so.  NDW came
>right up.  The only thing I had to do is to re-specify the printer setup
>for the printer icon on the desktop.  It kept disappearing on me.

I chose 'upgrade', and it seemed to install everything just fine.  NDW came up
ok, and everything works as before.  Am I missing something by not using
the 'custome' option?

>Just for fun, I went through all the MS provided icons in my NDW group
>windows, and changed the ICON with 'Properties'.  I just told it to load
>the icon from the program file, and it picked up the new spiffier MS icons.

You can use recorder to make a script that does this.  Select an icon, 
got to recorder, start recording, go throw the actions of updating the icon
with ndw, then stop recording.  Assign a ctrl key combo to the macro.  Then
all you have to do is select and icon and hit the key, and the macro does
the rest.

>That was it .. no hassle at all.


>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Tim Capps     | tim@qed.cts.com  or qed!tim  |  NOTE: New e-mail address
>QED Software  | The QED BBS (310)420-9327    |  Give The QED BBS a call!
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------
Bailey Brown                               "Above all else, confusion reigns."
Intergraph Corporation                                  
bbrown@casca.b11.ingr.com                              Procol Harum
From: gordy@das.harvard.edu (Robert Gordy)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Win 3.1 and True Type Fonts
Date: 10 Apr 92 14:57:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: das.1992Apr10.145735.15360
Organization: Aiken Computation Lab, Harvard University

I saw a posting a couple of days ago about some problems
with getting Word 2.0 and Write to find the True Type fonts.
I just got Win 3.1 yesterday and I'm finding the same problem.
I have a Deskjet 500 and a 386SX system.  Is there something
special that one must do in order to get the TT fonts?

--Rob
From: apland@mala.bc.ca
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Speaker.drv doesn't work
Date: 10 Apr 92 16:23:04 -0700
Organization: Malaspina College

>>I downloaded speak.exe from Genie and tried it out.  I installed
>>it correctly and in the sounds dialog box all of the events, such
>>as exclamation appear.  However, none of the sounds play from
>>here or in the setup drivers box or when I run sound recorder.
>>Strangely, on occassion, I do get a sound when Windows starts.
>>I have no other sound board or sound device such as Wired for
>>Sound.  386/25, 4mb, standard mode.
>>
>>Thanks in advance for any help or ideas.
>>
>>Brad Taylor (using Alice's account)
> 
> The reason Microsoft didn't distribute the speaker driver with win 3.1 
> is that they couldnt make it work with every PC.  On about 10% of all
> the machines that were tested, the speaker.drv either doesn't work at
> all or works incorrectly.

	Is Speak.exe available from an ftp site?  Thanks.
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: derrick@sdc.com (Derrick)
Subject: Re: VGA graphics in a windows in windows (how good is it???)
Summary: Dos Windows under Win 3.1
Keywords: Dos Windows 3.1
Organization: Systems Development Corporation
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:08:21 GMT

I was absolutely amazed at the improvement of DOS CGA/EGA/VGA screens
running in a window under Windows 3.1.

I ran the Miracle piano learning system software in a Win3.1 window.
(In case you dont know what I'm refering to,  the miracle software
has beautiful VGA screens)

It wasn't an exact color match, but it was the most amazing thing
I`ve seen Windows do.  Only parallelled by OS/2 2.0's ability to
do the same. 

I often find myself looking for other DOS apps to run in Win3.1 to 
gawk at.
From: sph0301@utsph.sph.uth.tmc.edu (Kate Wilson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: QEMM6.01 and SMARTDRV.EXE
Date: 7 Apr 1992 18:44:29 GMT
Organization: Univ. of Texas School of Public Health

Well, I just spent half the morning installing WIN3.1 and trying to optimize
memory.  SMARTDRV is now an executable instead of a device driver, has
increased in size from 8335 bytes (DOS5.0 version) to 43609 (!) bytes, and
so far QEMM refuses to let me load it into high memory.  Using the /GS
parameter shows that SMARTDRV requires 43K to load and leaves 27K resident
and can use the SQEEZEF option; but even with a bare bones config and
autoexec I can't make it load high. 

Anybody else had any luck with this?

Kate Wilson
sph0301@utsph.sph.uth.tmc.edu
From: rfs0838@zeus.tamu.edu (SCHAFFTER, RODNEY FRANK, JR)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Win3.1 and DR-DOS 5.0 problems...
Date: 8 Apr 92 15:51:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr8.082228.20025@newshub.sdsu.edu>, add@newshub.sdsu.edu (James D. Murray) writes...
>The tech support person also mentioned that Microsoft will be offering,
>in a week or so, a reduced price upgrade offer so that us poor souls who
>foolishly use DR-DOS can cheaply upgrade to MS-DOS 5.0.  Seeing as how I
>remember reading something in Info World a few weeks (months?) back about
>some probems DR-DOS 6.0 has with Win 3.1 that Microsoft wasn't planning
>on fixing, I may just do that.


	I just talked to DR yesterday, and they said that they would be 
shipping upgraded drivers for 6.0 to all registered users by month's end
to correct the Windows 3.1 problems.  You may want to look into upgrading 
to 6.0.
	 In PC Week Spencer says that 3.1 runs under DR-DOS 6.0 now if it 
is installed under MS-DOS 5.0, so that may be an option, if you can trust
a Katt. 

Rod Schaffter                                 	

Laboratory for Molecular Structure and Bonding	|Who cares if windows is or 
Texas A&M University Dept. of Chemistry		|isn't an opperating system-
Bitnet:   SCHAFFTER@TAMLMSB			|it barely operates at all!
INTERNET: SCHAFFTER@LMSBVX.TAMU.EDU		|
	"Standard Disclaimer, etc."		|An OOPerating system, maybe?
From: dew@turing.acs.virginia.edu (David E. Watson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Help with Windows 3.1 please.
Summary: Smartdrive 4.0 incompatable with SuperStor
Keywords: SuperStor Smartdrive
Date: 9 Apr 92 12:20:52 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: The Turing Project, Charlottesville Virginia.

Aaron McClure writes:

>2.I have found that I can not load Smartdrv.  When I do so
>my D: drive which is compressed using Superstore refuses
>to respond.  Is it important to run Smartdrv with W3.1?
>Is my problem with the compressed drive and if so is it
>possible to load Smartdrv with Superstore running.

There is an incompatablility between Smartdrive 4.0 and SuperStor
versions 1.3 (the one packaged with DR-DOS 6.0) and 2.0 (the March
1992 upgrade).  I talked with AddStor earlier this week and they have
a 2.04 revision that should clear up this problem.  
-- 

***********************************(+)**************************************
 David Watson      Internet: dew@Turing.acs.Virginia.EDU      (804)295-6736 
 Pony Express: 2111 Michie Drive #77, Charlottesville, Virginia  22901-2872
***********************************(-)**************************************
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: storm@cs.mcgill.ca (Marc WANDSCHNEIDER)
Subject: Re: MS/HP win Apple suit!
Organization: McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 16:42:43 GMT

In article <kdvDrh200WB34HsmJX@andrew.cmu.edu> rh0i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Richard Warren Harris) writes:
>pr@umiacs.umd.edu (Jesus Rodriguez) writes:
>> BOO HISS Microsoft :-(  Apple should have won that suit!
>
>By the way, I have the concept copyright on the frowny-face.  You owe
>me $100...

	Come come come... Apple was asking for 5$ BILLION for a  Trashcan, so
for a happy face you could probably get at LEAST 5$ Million....

-- 
  storm@cs.mcgill.ca           McGill University         C program run.  Run  
  Marc Wandschneider           Montreal, CANADA          Program run! PLEASE!
Ever wonder how Worf got to be Security Officer on the Enterprise when the 
Capt gets kidnapped from the bridge every two episodes and Troy Beats him up?
From: khamer@sumax.seattleu.edu (Little Kenny Hamer)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: WIN 3.1
Date: 9 Apr 92 03:30:03 GMT
Organization: Seattle University, Seattle WA



I have had 3.1 installed since monday and am happy (unlike some posters) to 
report that I have had no problems whatsoever with the upgrade.  It went 
more smoothly than any other in my life.  Before windows detractors say 
"well he must have a perfectly set up system from some well-known company
such as northgate or compaq" let me enlighten them.  My computer is an early 
486-25 that took 2 months in and out of the shop to configure and spits up 
regularly.  It is one cranky beast.  It is a no-name.  Yet Win3.1 is stable 
and much faster than ever before.  Turbo C++ runs fine, as does W4W.  

I will be getting OS/2 shortly in order to compare.  We'll see if it is
as good as the OS/2 evangelists say it is.  (contrary to prior comment, I
am remaining open-minded about the product.  Just not some of its supporters)

-Kenneth L. Hamer
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: burhans@teal.csn.org (Jackie Burhans)
Subject: Re: Egghead: Win 3.1
Organization: Colorado SuperNet, Inc.
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 16:52:10 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.202717.13201@vpnet.chi.il.us> lisbon@vpnet.chi.il.us (Gerry Swetsky) writes:
>    CompUSA has them all beat!  $44.97!  Bring your manual with you.
>
Waldensoftware $39.95; Actually I saw a CompUSA add for $29.95; must've
been a typo.
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: centaur@terminus.gatech.edu (Anthony G. Francis)
Subject: Windows 3.1 Bugs - Threat or Menace?
Summary: Standard Windows setup crashes every five minutes in 3.1
Keywords: windows 3.1 bug
Organization: Georgia Tech College of Computing
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 05:00:53 GMT

I have a Tri-Star 386/20 with an ATI Graphics Ultra, 2 100MB IDE hard drives,
a 20MB logical drive as C: and two Stacker drives (D: 80MBx2, E: 100MBx2) and
a garden-variety modem, parallel port card, etc; I also have a Sound Blaster.
I run Mirror (and obviously Stacker) DOSKEY, and a few other standard DOS 5 
goodies.

Under Windows, I run BACKDESK as my shell, with Screen Peace, Change Cursor,
Wired For Sound, and File Manager. Loading Windows under these conditions
has produced the following bugs:

Spontaneous Crash of BigDesk, usually after some other winapp goes down
Crash of Backmenu on Windows Exit
Crash of WinGif on 256 color BMPs
Crash of Paintbrush (Win 3.1 version) on a number of BMPs
Crash of Word For Windows 2.0 in Word Art, and then later in normal document
 mode
Crash of Program Manager (!!!) when I attempt to delete empty program groups,
 plus one spontaneous crash
Failure of the DOS program Eye of the Beholder to load

...plus...

One mysterious, total system crash. Poof. In Program Manager.

There is other weirdness ... like the sound recorder's failure to run, and
funny fonts in some dialogue boxes (BackDesk's). But these are unimportant
(or have already been corrected; the recorder was easy to fix) compared to
the failure of my shell (BackDesk), my GIF viewer (WinGif) and my _word
processor_ (Word For Windows).

What gives? I have sound, 800x600 graphics, font display, mouse support,
and no problem from Stacker. None of the problems everyone else seems to 
have caused so much as a hiccough on my machine! Aiiieee ....

Unless I can get things to run or can replace the software, it's time to
pull the Windows backup from Drive E ...

-Anthony Francis
--
Anthony G. Francis, Jr.  - Georgia Tech {Atl.,GA 30332}
Internet Mail Address: 	 - centaur@cc.gatech.edu
UUCP Address:		 - ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,ut-ngp}!gatech!prism!gt4864b
-------------------------------Quote of the post------------------------------ 
"Cerebus doesn't love you ... Cerebus just wants all your money" 
		- Cerebus the Aardvark, from a _Church and State_ T-shirt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky comp.windows.ms:11735 comp.windows.misc:715
From: greenejl@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Jonathan Greene)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 (Win NT too, for that matter)
Date: 6 Apr 92 23:36:36 GMT
Followup-To: comp.windows.ms
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

Hi!

I was wondering if win3.1 (and NT when it comes out) comes with 
multimedia extensons included.  I know 3.1 has some support for soundcards
and cd players.  Is it the same as mme?  If not, will there be a new mme
for 3.1?  Does the old mme work with 3.1?

Please e-mail me (post too, if you like).  I don't get to read this
newsgroup too often.


				Thank you,
						Jon Greene
				          	greenejl@mentor.c.purdue.edu
From: dsferrel@uncc.edu (Derek Sean Ferrell)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Running America Online under Win 3.1
Date: 13 Apr 92 18:09:15 GMT
Reply-To: dsferrel@uncc.edu
Organization: University of NC at Charlotte

Has anyone had any success running the America Online (v1.3) software under Win 3.1,
Either full screen or in a VGA window (in 386 enhanced mode, of course)? 
AOL comes with a PIF for win 3.0, but I could
never get it to run more than once even under win 3.0. 

 what happens is this:

under win 3.1, either in a window or full screen, it comes up and attempts to dial, but cannot access the modem. If I try again, I get the message that "the COM port does not exist." Only upon a reboot, does it seem to recognize the COM port again (although it still doesn't dial). My AOL works fine from a non-windows DOS prompt.

I don't really think Win 3.1 is at fault, since I run Qmodem and a few other communications programs in a DOS window with no problems.

(I realize AOL is a grapical program, but Win3.1 displays it quite nicely in a DOS window, - a vast improvement over Win3.0. It's just that the @#$#@ thing won't dial.)

Any help in this is most appreciated, but please respond by Email, as I can't always read the news.

Thanks,

Derek S. Ferrell
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: BLAC$GA@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (Garrick)
Subject: AmiPro 2.0 and Win 3.1
Organization: Yale University
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 92 11:44:03 EDT

I dragged my AmiPro icon over to the startup folder so it would boot up every
time I loaded windows.  I worked fine.  Then I decided that I wanted AmiPro
loaded every time I loaded windows, but I wanted it to run minimized.
So, I edited the properties of the AmiPro icon to have it run minimized.
But, then whenever I start windows, I get a divide by zero error from ami.
I've duplicated the problem over and over and it only occurs when AmiPro is
set to run minimized.  Any ideas?  I'll try calling lotus today.  I'm using
Win 3.1 and Ami 2.0.
                            Garrick Blalock
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms