HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: beckham@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Jeff Beckham)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Best marching band: Southern Illinois (not UW )
Date: 1 Oct 92 00:58:27 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler) writes:
>>So what is that comment supposed to mean?  Whate ARE other Big 10 band like,
>>anyway???  Just curious...
>	I already told everyone - they're all basically the same...
>	Oh, they all have their own little traditional quirk, like
>	the 5th Quarter, the "Dotting of the 'i'", the Chief, the
>	"World's Largest Drum", etc., but when they're playing the routine
>	halftime show, there isn't much difference.  I should know.
>	I've seen them all at one time or another the past 21 years...

So what's wrong with that?  I don't see any problem with traditions!  And for
the record, every half time show isn't the same.  We (at Illinois) do a LARGE
variety of things during the half-time shows.  We've done a spanish show, 
cortoon shows, circus shows, salute to Big-10 shows, movie shows, movie hero
shows, etc...  The list goes on and on.  So before you go ahead and make some
generalizations about Big-10 bands, got the facts first.


  			   	   --------------------------------------------
								  Jeff Beckham
						      beckham@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
						               Marching Illini
                                    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
				   --------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: richter@mcc.com (Charlie Richter)
Subject: Re: Purdue vs Notre Tame
Organization: MCC, Austin, TX
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 19:37:09 GMT

> This anti-woofing stuff seems to be working well so far....  Let me 
> put it to the test....

Anti-woofing is like a visit from the Great Pumpkin:  sincerity is the
key.

> A)  Purdue will get cremated by ND this weekend ...

One for one, or zero for one on anti-woofs.

> B)  Clinton will win a landslide victory over Bush in November ...

You're in serious jeopardy of going two for two here.  (Maybe Bush
should start woofing up a Clinton victory.  But he'd have to be
sincere, or the anti-woof wouldn't work.  The possibilities boggle
the mind!)

You really should have known that no amount of anti-woofing was going
to help poor old Purdue against Notre Dame.
-- 
Charlie Richter   MCC   Austin, Texas
  uucp: richter@milano.uucp     arpa: richter@mcc.com
"The panic ... was not due to anything fundamentally weak in either business
   or finance.  It was confined to the market itself."   - WSJ, Oct. 31, 1929
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund)
Subject: Re: Washington 17 USC 12+ ?
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 92 19:28:06 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1992Oct4.172500.4546@exu.ericsson.se> exuwry@exu.ericsson.se writes:
>Hi all,
>
>After watching Stanford beat Notre Dame Saturday I tuned in the
>remaining of the USC/Washington game.  I really didn't care who
>won, though I usually like to see the top ranked teams get beat,
>but my attention was captured by the late drive of Southern Cal.
>
>On the Washington interception in the endzone that killed the
>Trojans, I noticed that the Washington player never put his knee
>down in the endzone to cause a touchback.  He intercepted the pass
>and ran off the field out of the endzone with his teammates. 
>
>At the time, I thought I missed something because none of the announcers,
>coaches, or players responded.  I caught SportsCenter to catch the
>video and it shows what I thought I saw.... The Washington player never touching
>his knee to the turf!  The ESPN replay cut it off when the player was
>about 2 yards from the sideline, but I don't think there could have
>been anyway that his knee touched.
>
>Help me, did the Pac 10 officials (and everybody else) miss an
>easy call ?  Please respond if anyone else saw this.
>
>/Bill

Yes, I saw (and worried about ) this too.  My only guess is that the official
(incorrectly) blew his whistle ending the play.  But I have heard nothing
official about this.  

But as they say, the question is moot!  :-)

-Eric Jaderlund
 jade@triton.unm.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: lowe@lowe.b11.ingr.com (Keith Lowe)
Subject: Re: Could there be 3 nat'l champs?
Reply-To: lowe@ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph Corporation
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 12:28:06 GMT

In article <1992Sep29.183727.2633@b11.b11.ingr.com>, mcconnel@b11.b11.ingr.com (Guy McConnell) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep29.160150.29145@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> wilbanks@spot.Colorado.EDU (Wendell Gee) writes:
|> >I was wondering earlier - 
|> >Colorado goes 11-0, with a Orange Bowl bid,
|> >A&M goes 11-0, with a Cotton Bowl bid,
|> >Washington goes 11-0, with a Rose Bowl bid,
|> >Tennessee goes 11-0, with a Sugar Bowl bid.
|> >    
|> >Does anyone see a lil problem?
|> 
|>     Yes, someone laced your coffee.
|> 
|> >Weirder things have been known to happen, but I can't see Tennessee, A&M, 
|>                                                            ^^^^^^^^^
|> >or Washington losing this year. 
|> 
|>     Oh, I can see it.  Twice.

Allright, that's enough of that!  I have this vision of the
evening of Oct. 17, Barker calling Shane Matthews and the two
of them forming a "I was sacked 17 times by Tennessee" club! 

|> And one other thing; If an SEC team is
|> anything and 0 going into the bowl games, whoever they are, they
|> will be 12-0, not 11-0.  We *have* a playoff system.

You are right on the money there.

-- 
Keith
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rszczerb@chaucer.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Subject: Re: ND-Miami (more and more)
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 02:39:35 GMT

In article <5630@news.duke.edu> ds4@soc12.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS) writes:
>even if the qb had a bad game (the numbers do not tell the story correctly as I
>have heard).  The got a safety, and held Arizona to only 7 points.
>
>Rob, you are just too brilliant for this newsgroup...we are not ready to share
>in your vast wisdom for we are only mortal...so do not post here any more; for
>our sake.....
>
>-ds4

The way I heard it, it wasn't only the quarterback that had a bad game.
What happened to the running backs and the entire offensive line?

Actually, I'll probably be cheering for Miami over Florida State
'casue I'd rather see a Canes-Irish matchup in the Fiesta Bowl ...
that is assuming we both get through the rest of our games unscathed.

		- rob
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason Fawcett)
Subject: Re: Canes/FSU
Reply-To: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett)
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 19:38:40 GMT

News-Software: NN 6.4.16

In <1992Sep29.174452.6518@makesys.com> john@makesys.com (John Turman) writes:

| He'll be lucky to get out of the OB with just 5 interceptions. 
| The Canes defense will be gunning for him on every down. I
| seriously doubt that he will finish the game for the Noles. My prediction
| Canes 41 FSU 17 and I feel I'm being benevolent to FSU here.




As the prophet Confucius would say, " A wise man doesn't play leapfrog
with a Unicorn "

Avoid the pile up, Flame early.  Your on your own on this thread.

Jason 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Subject: Re: Arizona beats UCLA
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 06:12:14 GMT

wft@soda.berkeley.edu (William F. Tell) writes:
>
>The only teams which really threaten the Huskies chances are Stanford
>and Cal, and Washington plays both of those teams at home.
>

Do not foregt about Washington State.  They destroyed Temple yesterday
51-10, are undefeated and ranked highly in the others recieving votes
part of both polls.  They also traditionally give the Huskies hell
when we are in a position to go to the Rose Bowl.  (The last two years
don't count,  U-Dub had already locked up the invite by then).  Also,
I would have to add Arizona to that list after what they did to UCLA
last night.  That defense is as scary as the Husky defense was last
year.  Their offense isn't terribly potent, but they don't need to
score a whole lot of points--ask Miami or UCLA.

Both the WSU and UA games are away for the Huskies.  Our schedule
strength sure has gotten a lot tougher recently with the Wisconsin
win over OSU and Arizona's upset of UCLA and near upset of the 'Canes.
If Washington State, California, and Wisconsin all make it into the
top 25 by year's end and USC stays there (likely at least 3 out of
the four might occur), Washington could end up playing six ranked
teams before the bowls (throwing in Nebraska and Stanford as well).
This doesn't look so weak now, does it?  Of course, no one knows how 
good teams will be before the season starts (and we still don't),
but this seems like an interesting thread to take the place of all
those stupid UCLA-UW undefeated season to play (insert your favorite
team here) threads.

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
University of Washington      *   water again!
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
From: gt6390a@prism.gatech.EDU (BERNSTEIN,AVRON P)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Tech-Clemson
Date: 27 Sep 92 04:09:05 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


Final score:
Ga. Tech 20
Clemson  16
-- 
BERNSTEIN,AVRON P
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt6390a
Internet: gt6390a@prism.gatech.edu
From: gt6390a@prism.gatech.EDU (BERNSTEIN,AVRON P)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Comparative ticket prices
Date: 27 Sep 92 04:40:36 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


Here at Tech, we pay an athletic and activity fee along with tuition and
(with a student ID) gain access to home athletic events for free.  I think
this quarter the athletic fee was $33.  Quite a bargin!  $33 for 5-6 home
football games, or for home tickets to basketball in the ACC.  Imagine what
tickets to UNC, Duke, NCSU, etc. (b-ball) would cost on the street.  For 
football, you just flash your ID and walk in and they hand you a ticket, but
for basketball you have to lineup two days before, get a number, come back
at 7 am, and get your ticket.
-- 
BERNSTEIN,AVRON P
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt6390a
Internet: gt6390a@prism.gatech.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mcconnel@b11.b11.ingr.com (Guy McConnell)
Subject: Re: Alabama vs La. Tech
Reply-To: mcconnel@b11.b11.ingr.com (Guy McConnell)
Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 21:15:09 GMT

In article <1992Sep29.194054.5063@b11.b11.ingr.com> chad@chad.b11.ingr.com (Chad McGuire) writes:
>
>What do some of the other Tide fans think about Mal's offensive genius,
>Jim Thomas, Guy McConnell,...?

    I can sum up my feelings:  Bring back Homer.

--
Guy McConnell  guy@mspe5.b11.ingr.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Subject: Re: Best marching band
Reply-To: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 15:55:00 GMT


As a former member of the Duke University Marching Band (DUMB) I
guess I'll add my two cents worth (rather than lurk - since this
is a non-football playing field topic).  

At Duke we now (as opposed to 10 years ago) have a more "traditional"
marching band with about 110 members (reflecting the size of our
undergrad student body).  We had 2 two hour practices each week
in season, and managed to give a show that was musically and 
visually pleasing for each home game.  On consecutive home 
dates we would peform the same show to the home, then visitor
sides.  

We certainly weren't the best marching band, but managed to
deliver a good show without dedicating our lives to it.
I'd say maybe 1/4 - 1/3 of the band was of the engineering
persuasion, with no more than 1 music major.  Why?  Duke has
very few music majors, and those that are usually choose other
ensembles for their participation.

I'll have to say, though, it was nice to be cheered by the
Virginia alums in '87 when we took the field in Scott Stadium,
followed by their booing of the UVa band.

Sure, we had fun, and often built some student jokes into our scripts,
but our goal was to entertain the lot.  At basketball games, however,
this was a different story, as we became, yes:

		THE WORLD'S MOST ANNOYING BAND

But this is a subject for r.s.bb.c which I'll go back to now...
--
* "In 27 years of marriage, Todd never noticed Marie's tentacle" *
Orin Day, Code 664.1                    oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov
Hughes STX/NASA       GSFC Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics
*******"Think that this is NASA's opinion?   NO, NO, NO!!!" ******
From: crs@milton.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re:      r.s.f.c 5th Newsgroup Poll
Date: 2 Oct 92 18:01:13 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Oct2.180113.2023
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

Bapi Gupta <C31801AG@WUVMD> writes:
>
>Here is this week's newsgroup poll.
>
>Washington is far and away our #1 team this week.  The 'O' under first place
>votes turns out to be 24 votes out of the 35 cast.  I see Cliff has been
>recruiting the freshman....  (Homer didn't get a vote in though).
>
>
>THIS WEEK'S CONTRIBUTORS (35)

[...all contributors deleted who are not actually posting from 
    Washington...]

> Glenn Tanner <tannerg@u.washington.edu>

Why Bapi,  you give me too much credit.  I recruit nationally, not just
from Seattle.

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
University of Washington      *   water again!
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rszczerb@shakespeare.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Subject: Re: What everyone who missed the ND-Stanford game wants to know
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 01:00:09 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.191827.979@colorado.edu> manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu) writes:
>In article <1992Oct5.171302.17686@news.nd.edu> rwood1@puccini.helios.nd.edu (richard wood) writes:
>
>Yeah, but the great teams still win!!! hint: Miami; NOT ND.
>

Sure, ND can tie #3 Michigan and lose to #8 Stanford ...
and the mightly Canes can beat Arizona by a point and
even stomp on a few Division I-AA teams too.

Wow ... it's no wonder everyone is so scared to play
the mighty canes.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: UW - OSU
From: demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man)
Date: 4 Oct 92 01:18:34 EST
Organization: Demonic Possesions, Inc.
Summary: Still on track for that 10-2 prediction :)

In article <BvK9JF.CF6@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, pol30546@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Peder Larsen) writes:
> WOW!!!
> 
> I haven't seen the game but I just heard the score so I changed stations.
> 
> UW  20
> OSU 16   4:30 left
> 
> OSU just accepted a roughing the kicker call after MAKING the extra point
> They then missed the 2 point conversion.
> Oops!!!

	They were going for the win.  Had they played for the tie (a la
Indiana...) they could have kicked on 4th and 5 instead of...


	LOSING THE FUCKING GAME!!!!!!!



	AHHHHH AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!



	Actually, I'd have gone for the win also.

	I really, really, really hate Wisconson.  But I'd hate them worse if
they were a scrub team instead of a pretty good team :).

Brett                                                      
_______________________________________________________________________________
Proconsul Computer Consulting                                        CHA-CHING!
Better, Cheaper, Faster					       (Pick any two :)
Disclaimer:								   NOT!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Subject: Re: njan
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Madison
Date: 5 Oct 92 22:49:32 CDT

In article <1992Oct6.030525.17094@colorado.edu> manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu) writes:
>In article <1992Oct6.011819.21498@news.duc.auburn.edu> steinse@eng.auburn.edu writes:
>>As an alum of U. Colorado, Boulder, I say, without hesitation,
>>
>>	"K.S. Manu is a dork."
>
>Like I care!!! Get a life, asshole...

The fact you responded indicates that you do.

>Seems like you had a troubled childhood... Maybe you should visit your 
>psychiatrist more often...

Are you a psychology or pre-med (with an interest in psychiatry) major?
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.)
Subject: Re: MICH: 60 something HOUSTON:7
Organization: University of Houston Administrative Computing
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 14:36:09 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20

In <1992Sep27.063101.5034@zip.eecs.umich.edu> sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu writes:

> Well, I don't know if it was our 4th-string defense, but basically
> they weren't playing run-n-shoot type defense.  The defensive
> coordinator had the guys playing a standard 4-defensive back -defense
> and they got burned on two long passes.  
> 
> They all got chewed out good on the side-lines by Lloyd though.
> 
> As far as the score,  it wasn't nearly that close.  Michigan sat on 
> the ball the entire second half... Of course, what else do ya do 
> when you're up 42-0.

  If you're Houston, you keep throwing the ball downfield, trying to score some
more points, demonstrating a total lack of class, and generating ill feelings
that will come back and haunt you for years to come.


semper fi,

Jammer Jim Miller 
Texas A&M University '89 and '91
********************************************************************************
* Speak for my employers?  They don't even know I exist!		       *
*"Become one with the Student Billing System. *BE* the Student Billing System."*
* "Power finds its way to those who take a stand.  Stand up, Ordinary Man."    *
*      ---Rik Emmet, Gil Moore, Mike Levine: Triumph 		               *
********************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rszczerb@beethoven.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Subject: Re: Miami, Florida
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 23:25:31 GMT

In article <BvM2Jt.F2u@news.cso.uiuc.edu> yl44729@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Rick Lin ) writes:
>
>Hey Notre Dame fans!  At least Miami doesn't play for a tie, they play to WIN!  

It seems to me that if the FSU kicker had converted on a relatively
easy 37 yard field goal, then the mighty Canes would have tied too.
From: jb118@prism.gatech.EDU (Jeffrey N. Burch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: This Week in the SEC (Oct. 3)
Date: 5 Oct 92 14:44:44 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Georgia Tech Research Institute -- EOL

In article <1992Oct5.073305.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:
>In article <69915@hydra.gatech.EDU>, mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:
> 
>> OLE MISS (3-2) beat KENTUCKY (3-2), 24-14
>> 
>> The Rebels jumped out an early lead in this one and hung on for
>> a much needed conference win.
>
>Does anyone know the details of the end of this game?  I caught the tail end
>of a radio talk show and some Kentucky fans were raising heck about Curry
>supposedly just giving up at the end of the game.  Unfortunately, I didn't
>get all of the facts.
>
>Details, anyone??

I missed the first 10 minutes or so of the game (couldn't pull it in
on the radio).  But I followed all of the rest of it.

I have no idea what the fans were complaining about - UK didn't "give 
up" at the end of the game -  they were 10 points down and their offense 
was sputtering.   Coaching didn't enter into it, except of course for 
ulimate responsibility for team performance.

UK had trouble hanging onto the ball all game - they fumbled or were
intercepted on their first 4 possessions or so, although Ole Miss didn't 
get TDs each time (the UK defense hung tough at first).  The Wildcats 
basically spotted the Rebels a 17-0 lead before they decided to play. 
Once they got going, they came to within 17-14, and should've been able
to punch through for a third straight TD, but a couple of missed blocks
on critical plays let them stall on the Ole Miss 30, and they missed a
field goal.  

In the 4th quarter, they went back to playing the way they did in
the first half (lousy), and Ole Miss managed another TD to ice it.
But there was no "giving up" at any time.

Wonder what the callers were complaining about?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^  Dr. J(effrey Neil Burch)                 jb118@prism.gatech.edu    ^
^  Georgia Tech Research Institute                                    ^ 
^  Electro-Optics and Physical Sciences Laboratory                    ^ 
^  Atlanta, Ga.                                                       ^
^  30332                  Wildcats are perfect, the e-pit-o-me,       ^
^  404-894-3628        of good looks and grace,  and quiet dignity.   ^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From: wyborsr@wl.com (Russ Wyborski)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: ND & polls
Date: 29 Sep 92 18:14:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: wl.1992Sep29.181453.16844
Organization: Warner Lambert / Parke-Davis


	After the most recent CNN poll where Penn State moved ahead of ND,
I don't think that anyone can claim tht ND is given special favors in the
polling system. They haven't lost to anyone this year, and you can all save
your comments about the Michigan game, and they have still dropped 4 spots
in this poll. You can say what you want about the competition thay have 
beaten but PSU has exactly beaten any juggernauts either but yet they have
continued to move up in the rankings. This is just another example of why
some kind of playoff/computer scoring system is needed to really decide this
thing.
	The only way that ND will win another MNC is to go undefeated and 
untied through a season. Even then my bet is that if there is another 
undefeated team then ND will get the shaft.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: serdar@fawlty8.eng.monash.edu.au (Serdar Boztas)
Subject: Rose Bowl 3-peats (was Re: Rose Bowl)
Keywords: Huskies Trojans MNC
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 01:16:05 GMT

In article <3100@voodoo.UUCP> stu@voodoo.boeing.com writes:
>The Huskies can definitely come out with a NC title all to themselves and 
>not have to share it like they did last year.  The only problem with 
>this scenario is that UCLA might get to play in the Rose Bowl and keep 
>the Huskies from the possibility of the only 
>ROSE BOWL THREE-PEAT IN HISTORY!!!  Bummer, dudes!

This is essentially correct. USC has attended the Rose Bowl 3 years in
a row (even 4 in a row), but did not win it 3 years in a row.

These years were:

	1944		Beat Washington(!) 29-0 
	1945		Beat Tennessee 25-0
	1946		Lost to Alabama 34-14

	1967		Lost to Purdue 14-13
	1968		Beat Indiana 14-3
	1969 		Lost to OSU 27-16
	1970		Beat Michigan 10-3
	
	1973		Beat OSU 42-17
	1974		Lost to OSU 42-21
	1975		Beat OSU 18-17

	1988		Lost to Michigan St 20-17	
	1989		Lost to Michigan 22-14
	1990		Beat Michigan (I don't have the score)

Serdar

Geaux Treauxjans!
--
-- 
Inhabited by absurd fears,  they only discuss  the puerilities with which 
every fool is familiar, and dare not, by turning a bold hand to the human 
heart, offer its gigantic idiosyncrasies to our views.     Sade, 'Justine'
Serdar Boztas \\ serdar@fawlty1.eng.monash.edu.au \\ +(61)3-565-5722 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college