HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 92 16:53:48 EDT
Organization: Monsoon Software, Inc.

bwolfe@trentu.ca (BEN WOLFE) writes:

> From a Canadaian perspective, Al Gore is seen as a bit of a visionary, on
> the environment in particular. His environmental views are my main reason
> for sitting here quietly and hoping for a Democratic victory south of the
> border.

Apart from his environmental views, Gore is a fairly conventional,
southern career-politician. During his tenure in the Senate he never
failed to support any defense appropriation bill and was also a
vocal supporter of America's interventionist policies in Central
America. I don't believe that Clinton is any more progressive in
his views. However, given the choices, there's no doubt as to which
ticket I'll vote for.


Sunil Gupta
Monsoon Software, Inc.
sg@monsoon.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: ngph@cda.mrs.umn.edu (Peh H. Ng )
Subject: Re: Dan Advertises for Murphy Brown Reruns!
Organization: University of Minnesota - Morris
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 20:12:42 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.140237.2014@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu> dylan@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu (Dylan) writes:
>I heard late last night on the Radio that
>the Danster agreed to do a promo spot for
>Murphy Brown reruns on a local Los Angeles
>station.
>
>The script was something along the lines of:
>"Murphy Brown?  NOT!"
>
>I guess they didn't want him to do anything
>too difficult.  Can anyone else confirm or
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>deny this story?  I can't find it in today's
>newspapers.

 Yes, I saw it on the news and also on one of the 
morning shows - I think it is "Good Morning America".

 When will these republicans get back to the main issues 
instead of hounding on fictional TV characters?!!!!!

Peh...
>
>Dylan
>
>John D. Murray  dylan@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu
>Phila, PA
>Bhakail, East


Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:3813 alt.politics.bush:5272 alt.politics.clinton:5603
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:56:41 EDT
From: <JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Neil "Welfare Queen" Bush

O.K.  Everybody watch NBC at 10 p.m. EST for a report about Neil Bush
and a post-Silverado deal.  He put up $3,000 of his own money, gave himself
a salary of $160,000/year and the taxpayers (via the SBA) are stuck with
over $2 million in bills.

Talk about your welfare queens!

Jeff Luck                                 *Standard Disclaimer*
CES Systems Office
Penn State University              "Whatever you guys want, I'm for."
JFL4@PSUVM.PSU.EDU                   -Dan Quayle to Ohio Farmers, 1988
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cortez@milton.u.washington.edu (Tom Warner)
Subject: Re: Small thoughts and complaints
Organization: University of Washington
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 15:01:24 GMT

elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:

>glass@adcalc.fnal.gov (Michael Glass) writes:

>>
>> 4)  I become uncomfortable when MQ-bashing takes the form of generic
>>     female-bashing or wife-bashing, such as in posts of the form "if YOU
>>     had to look at MQ every day, then you, too, would spend all your time
>>     golfing."   Am I the only one who feels this way?
>>

>I don't see such responses as generic.  I think it's a very specific reference
>to the Dannsterette.  There was a quote in Newsweek a couple of weeks back
>where a Quayl handler admitted that 'she has no lovable side.'  Indeed, if I
>had to look at *her*, I'd stay out on the golf course, or in my Senate office.
>Combine that with her fundamentalist religious beliefs, and I'd get divorced.
>Since that doesn't jive with conservative 'family values,' and cheating on her
>would get me in serious trouble with the press, I'd play 18 holes a day.

I'm torn. On one hand, the number of posts on a.f.d.q that remind us yet again
of how unattractive Marilyn really is were tired almost as soon as they began.
On the other hand, I almost fell off my chair when someone pointed out how much
she looks like Prince Charles and he looks like Princess Di.

Even as a het male, I'd much rather be married to Charles than Marilyn. Not 
'cause he's prettier and has more money and nifty palaces all over the UK. He
just comes off so much more down to earth, you know? I get the feeling he
might have something halfway intelligent to say once in a while, and might
even get along with my friends. We'd both have to have our affairs on the
side, but when it comes to the royal family, what else is new?

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rdetweil@boi.hp.com (Richard Detweiler)
Subject: Re: Dan Advertises for Murphy Brown Reruns!
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 15:47:02 GMT
Organization: Hewlett Packard - Boise Printer Division (LAFS)

In article <BuDvnr.3wL@nic.umass.edu> jennyg@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Jenny Gutbezahl) writes:
>In article <lav3dsINNtl@mizar.usc.edu> biddleco@mizar.usc.edu (Susan Biddlecomb) writes:
>
>>
>>Can anyone think of any other standing President or Vice President who has
>>made a TV commercial (besides campaign stuff) while in office?
>>
>>Susan
>>
>
>Well, Nixon appeared on Laugh-In.  Does that count?
>
>

And didn't Gerald Ford do a Mary Tyler Moore show?
From: sef@Veritas.COM (Sef Kloninger)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: A Simple Question
Date: 10 Sep 92 18:01:27 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: VERITAS Software

In article <1992Sep9.132740.19009@news.uiowa.edu> williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams) writes:
>>>Curious that Mr. Bush could not find a single republican president he wants
>>>to emulate.
>> 	He kind of reminds me of Herber Hoover.
>Here in Iowa we know Herbert Hoover, and
>let me tell you, George Bush is no Herbert Hoover.

george bush = yale
herbert hoover = stanford

enough said  d:)

-sef

-- 
------------------
Sef Kloninger
Veritas Software                        Stanford University
sef@veritas.com                         sef@cs.stanford.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bwatson@nyx.cs.du.edu (bruce watson)
Subject: Re: AN ANAGRAM!!! WE HAVE ONE!!!
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 18:50:44 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.044504.18941@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Joe.Francis@dartmouth.edu (Joe Francis) writes:

>All right, all right; I know it's not a.d.q related and I *beg for
>mercy*, but while we're here....
>
>Does anyone know what Cavett is up to these days?  I've only heard him
>twice in the last year, and both were interviews where he talked about
>his bout with depression.

He has a half hour interview show on cable's CNBC.


--
Bruce Watson  wats@nyx.cs.du.edu  Toy Cows, Toy Cows in Africa, Toy Cows
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:3816 alt.politics.bush:5280 alt.politics.clinton:5610
From: rjwill6@PacBell.COM (Rod Williams)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: Neil "Welfare Queen" Bush
Date: 16 Sep 92 00:11:43 GMT
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Francisco

> <JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu> (Jeff Luck) writes:

>O.K.  Everybody watch NBC at 10 p.m. EST for a report about Neil Bush
>and a post-Silverado deal.  He put up $3,000 of his own money, gave himself
>a salary of $160,000/year and the taxpayers (via the SBA) are stuck with
>over $2 million in bills.
>
>Talk about your welfare queens!

And check out the current issue of "Mother Jones" magazine
for more revelations about how three Bush offspring (Neil,
Jeb and George Jr.) have consorted with criminals, embezzlers
and other assorted lowlifes for personal gain at public
expense.  Talk about your family values!
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
rod williams -=- pacific bell -=- san francisco -=- rjwill6@pacbell.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Subject: Re: Vote 92
Originator: pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 03:16:45 GMT

In article <1992Sep08.225604.23497@bnr.ca> yount@crchh473.BNR.CA (Jeff Yount) writes:
>>From: lcl@splinter.coe.northeastern.edu (Lisa C. Lewis)
>>The following is posted by a friend, but I agree with what he's saying, so
>>follow up to me anyway.
>>
>>Make history this year...
>>
>>BE SURE TO VOTE AND VOTE THE DEMOCRATIC TICKET!!
>>
>>Tell six friends to tell six friends to tell six friends, etc., etc.,
>>
>>to get out and vote and make those votes votes for Clinton/Gore....
>>
>>It's time for a change that's long overdue...
>
>I couldn't agree more with Lisa. If you do not like the way things have
>been going in this country the last few years, don't like having somebody
>like Dan Quayle a heartbeat away from the Oval Office, don't want people
>like Pat Robertson influencing national policy, please vote this November.
>Because if you thought, as I did, that the group at the Republican
>Convention were among the scariest bunch of people you've seen lately,
>you should realize that THEY WILL be voting this year.

I can't believe that I am getting involved in one of these "go out and
vote" threads, but...............

I am the first to agree that people who are of the democratic slant should
get out there and vote for Clinton/Gore. But I go beyond this. Those of
the republican slant should get out and vote for Bush/Quayle. Those of
the Libertarian slant should get out and vote for Marou/Whoever-the-hell-is
is-his-running-mate. Those of the Fascist slant should get out and vote 
for the Larouche/Insert-your-favorite-fascist-here ticket.

I don't like to suggest to others who they should vote for. The point is,
every one should vote. If you don't vote, you have no right to complain.
This extends from the President to your local dog catcher (hey, maybe this
could be DQ's new job?!?!?!).

I just got home from voting for my Senate race. Go Russ Fiengold!!!!!!!!

Patrick Pape
pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: alex@engr3.umbc.edu (alex)
Subject: Re: A Simple Question
Organization: University of Maryland, Baltimore County Campus
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 02:13:17 GMT

In article <Bu9tnB.C1L.1@cs.cmu.edu> alexo+@cs.cmu.edu (Alex Orenshteyn) writes:
>In article <1992Sep8.135545.26002@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:

>Curious that Mr. Bush could not find a single republican president he wants
>to emulate.

	He kind of reminds me of Herber Hoover.



-- 
                               Alex Crain::UMBC Academic Computing Services
The feminist agenda is a socialist, anti-family political movement that 
encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice 
witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. - Pat Robertson 1992
From: Frederick.A.Ringwald@dartmouth.edu (Frederick A. Ringwald)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Calvin for President (was Re: I'm dragging out the old 
 T-shirt)
Date: 8 Sep 92 02:24:52 GMT
 <YAMAUCHI.92Sep6215527@sartre.ces.cwru.edu>  
 <1992Sep7.022409.22481@athena.mit.edu>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a4@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <1992Sep7.022409.22481@athena.mit.edu>
yuna@athena.mit.edu (Yuna Huh) writes:

> Nah.  Kirk/Spock '92!

Unconstitutional for Spock: he wasn't born in the U.S.A.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Subject: The Humors of Dan 
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 15:41:19 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.222522.27343@nevada.edu> crail@nevada.edu (DONNA CRAIL-RUGOTZKE) writes:
>Yes, it is true, Dan has agreed to do a video promotional for the
>KTLA Channel 5.   In the promotion, Quayle is asked "So, what's your
>favorite TV program?"  Quayle's response is "Murphy Brown -NOT!" In a
>second promo, Quayle responds to the same question " 'Murphy Brown' on
>KTLA Channel 5 -NOT!"  These promos are advertising the station's reruns
>of "Murphy Brown."  At the very least, Quayle seems to have a sense of humor.
                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Let's hope so; sense of humor is a necessary condition for entrance
into Humanland (IMHO).  However, this may just be a Trojan Laugh on
the part of Our Boy.  Recently, there has been discussions on a.f.d-q
about the possibility of Dan-o's self-effacing humor and bumbling
manner simply being a mask for his real purposes, like the dismantling
of safety and environmental regulations via the Competitiveness
Council.  Paranoid?  Maybe yes, maybe no ...

Also, it is difficult to know how much of the Dandroid's public
persona is really him, and how much is scripted by his handlers.
At least Ronnie Reagan could take a leaden script, infuse his
personal charm (sic) into it, and make it sound natural and 
entertaining.  Dan-o doesn't have any of RR's charisma or
acting skills (I think), but he keeps trying.

BTW, I saw Al Gore on TV the other night, and he was asked about
the Competitiveness Council.  He assessment of it (a backroom 
attempt to remove regulations without public input) was amazingly
accurate.  But most surprising, I suddenly considered that in 
four months we might have a VP who can string several syntactically
correct sentences together to express a complete thought.  This concept
was so overwhelming that I had to turn off the TV until
my heart stopped racing.

>
>Donna
>crail@nevada.edu
>  
-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Calvin for President (was Re: I'm dragging out the old T-shirt)
Date: 7 Sep 92 16:30:49 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <mjenkins.715869970@cunews> mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson) writes:
>In <1992Sep7.022409.22481@athena.mit.edu> yuna@athena.mit.edu (Yuna Huh) writes:
>
>>Nah.  Kirk/Spock '92!
>
>Wayne/Garth?
>
>
>
>Excellent

I've seen "Vote for Cthulu '92: Why Settle for the Lesser of Two Evils?"


--
"I wish I could vote for you a hundred times"
"You can . . . just kidding."
			-- _Bob Roberts_
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:3474 alt.politics.bush:4479
From: sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: "Liberal" - A Misnomer
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 92 10:45:34 EDT
Organization: Monsoon Software, Inc.

jason@ab20.larc.nasa.gov (Jason Austin) writes:

> 	Words mean things, and the terms liberal and conservative
> designate a general politcal philosophy.  A conservative believes in a
> reduction of government and traditional values while a liberal
> believes in the expansion of government to supply everyone with
> everything they need.  Both of these terms are more extreme than most

This is quite interesting and self-serving verbal contortion. Upon what
historical antecedents do you base your above definitions?

A conservative (in the Burkian tradition) is one who wishes for things
to stay basically the same; one who believes that whatever structures
we have evovled have come down through history (or from God) and should
not be altered lightly.

A liberal (a la Locke) would argue that there exist valid structures
which we either have not tried or which we can borrow from other
cultures. It is a more progressive view and a more tolerant view.

From neither of these definitions can you directly infer one's view
of the role of government. In fact, an examination of recent US
history would put the lie to your supposed definitions. We have
witnessed one of the largest expansions of state spending and control
under a supposedly conservative administration.

Besides, isn't it quite ironic for someone who feeds off one of the
largest pieces of pork to complain about the size of government?


Sunil Gupta
Monsoon Software, Inc.
sg@monsoon.com
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dan Advertises for Murphy Brown Reruns!
Date: 15 Sep 92 16:31:15 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <1992Sep14.195419.29100@ccu.umanitoba.ca> browns@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Stuart Brown) writes:
>
>I distinctly remember Gerald Ford on Saturday Night Live - playing opposite
>Chevy Chase doing his Gerald Ford impersonation.  Did this happen? or am
>I just remembering a late 70's fantasy of my own?a

Yes, it did.  

One of Chevy's tag lines was "Hi, I'm Chevy Chase, and you're not".
And his slapstick impressions of Mr. Bumble were legendary.
So once, at the beginning of SNL, we were greeted with
a film of Gerry Ford saying, with a reasonably straight face,
"Hi, I'm Gerald Ford ... and you're not".

This is how I remember it.
And this, in the era of the Imperial Presidency!

>Stuart M. Brown                             If you can remain cool when all 


-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 92 14:05:47 CDT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS, New Orleans, LA

bwolfe@trentu.ca (BEN WOLFE) writes:

> In article <92247.202316KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>, Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu
> >>>  So what is going to happen to this thread when Dan is gone?  Who are we
> >>>gonna laugh at?  Who is going to be the new Dan Quayle for the next 4
> >>>years.
> >
> >Well, if the Democrats win, Gore is every bit as laughable as Quayle.
> >If not more.
>
> From a Canadaian perspective, Al Gore is seen as a bit of a visionary, on
> the environment in particular. His environmental views are my main reason
> for sitting here quietly and hoping for a Democratic victory south of the
> border.
>
> It's a bit mind-wrenching, not to mention terrifying, to listen to Bush
> try to make support of the environmnet anti-American in 1991 as the globe
> warms and the ozone thins.
>
> Ben Wolfe
> Peterborough, Ontario


Gore will be funny if they turn Tipper loose.  He'll be boring by comparison.



|Edward J. Branley                         elendil@mintir.New-Orleans.LA.US|
|Seashell Software                                UUCP:  rex!mintir!elendil|
|3508 North Woodlawn Avenue                          Compu$erve: 71237,2227|
|Metairie, LA   70006       voice: +1-504-455-5087     bbs: +1-504-455-8665|
From: hagst3+@pitt.edu (Herschel  A Gelman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Calvin for President (was Re: I'm dragging out the old T-shirt)
Date: 9 Sep 92 20:00:05 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <4994@sumax.seattleu.edu> sstover@sumax.seattleu.edu (Maven o'Mirth) writes:
>In article <Bu9yrG.HD@scd.hp.com> dianem@boi.hp.com (Diane Mathews) writes:
>>>>>>> Nah.  Kirk/Spock '92!
>>	Calvin/Hobbes, or Hobbes/Calvin
>>
>>I say it ought to be Picard/Data.  This nationalism business is for the
>>birds.  Local tribalism maybe, but let's think global.
>>
>>Guess my liberal/cultural elitism is showing.  Better keep it covered up.
>
>Ahhh.  No, I think I have it.  Agent Cooper and Sheriff Truman in '92. 
>Two lawmen, yes, but with a proletarian appreciation for fine coffee and
>doughnuts.
>
>Good to be back, kids.

As countless respectable politicians have undoubtedly already said, this nation
is straying too far from the basics.  We have to remember the traditional, not
this new-fangled radicalism that this newsgroup is showing.  Kirk/Spock?  
Picard/Data?  Cooper/Truman?  NO!

Let me guide you poor lost souls back to the truth:

			Calvin and Hobbes in '92

	*  They show individualism and determination!  They won't be affected
	   by the oncoming demon of political correctness;  Calvin's extensive
	   funding for G.R.O.S.S.  (Get Rid Of Slimy girlS) will not be
	   reduced!  This is what this country needs: a man (well, not yet)
	   who will stand firmly to his beliefs:

		*  The extension of the "minimum wage" concept to allowances

		*  An extensive reduction in gun control legislation.  After
		   all, if a kid wants to do some serious damage, silly gun
		   control laws shouldn't be placed in his way.

		*  A simple, yet effective, elimination of the "parent" as we
		   know it--he will set up a revolutionary new set of "family
		   values" which will leave adults speechless (literally).

		*  And, most importantly, our inefficient government will be
		   completely restructured.  No longer will our leader have to
		   deal with an unweildly Congress;  no longer will the whims
		   of the uneducated masses ruin this country.  Yes, that's
		   right, folks:  Calvin, if elected, shall become Dictator For
		   Life!!  No more elections to disturb the television
		   schedule!!!

Yes, life would be better for us all.  Remember.  Calvin.  Hobbes.  Two people
who can get the job done.  Or, come up with a great excuse for not doing it.

---
Herschel Gelman
hagst3+@pitt.edu	or	hagst3@vms.cis.pitt.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: larryh@cabezon.uucp (Larry Huntley)
Subject: Re: Dan Advertises for Murphy Brown Reruns!
Organization: Logic Modeling Inc of Beaverton, Oregon
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 20:06:50 GMT

In article <lav3dsINNtl@mizar.usc.edu> biddleco@mizar.usc.edu (Susan Biddlecomb) writes:
>
>Can anyone think of any other standing President or Vice President who has
>made a TV commercial (besides campaign stuff) while in office?
>

    Not exactly a commercial, but there was Nixon's appearance on
    'Laugh In' ("Sock it to *ME*?!") during his first term in the
    White House.

     - Larry "Didn't vote for him in '68" Huntley

-- 
         (larryh@lmc.com)         | You played golf; you watched football;
     Logic Modeling Corporation   |   you drank beer -- we EVOLVED!
          Beaverton,  OR          |         - Rhonda,  "Thing-Fish"
From: yount@crchh473.BNR.CA (Jeff Yount)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: re: Vote 92
Date: 8 Sep 92 22:56:04 GMT
Reply-To: yount@crchh473.BNR.CA (Jeff Yount)
Organization: BNR

>From: lcl@splinter.coe.northeastern.edu (Lisa C. Lewis)
>The following is posted by a friend, but I agree with what he's saying, so
>follow up to me anyway.
>
>Make history this year...
>
>BE SURE TO VOTE AND VOTE THE DEMOCRATIC TICKET!!
>
>Tell six friends to tell six friends to tell six friends, etc., etc.,
>
>to get out and vote and make those votes votes for Clinton/Gore....
>
>It's time for a change that's long overdue...

I couldn't agree more with Lisa. If you do not like the way things have
been going in this country the last few years, don't like having somebody
like Dan Quayle a heartbeat away from the Oval Office, don't want people
like Pat Robertson influencing national policy, please vote this November.
Because if you thought, as I did, that the group at the Republican
Convention were among the scariest bunch of people you've seen lately,
you should realize that THEY WILL be voting this year.
From: tcws@convex1.tcs.tulane.edu (Bill Sirinek)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Tucker's Email
Date: 8 Sep 92 21:08:36 GMT

Nntp-Posting-Host-[nntpd-20865]: convex1.tcs.tulane.edu
Organization: Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 21:04:54 GMT

Havent been keeping up with much lately, but what *is* Tucker's Email
address? I dont want to flame the guy, just ask him a few (nice) questions.

--
| Bill Sirinek                     Snail: Box 3799, Tulane University     |
| Computer Science Major                  New Orleans, LA 70118           |
| Tulane University               BITNET: tcws000@tcsmusa                 |
| New Orleans, Louisiana        Internet: tcws@convex1.tcs.tulane.edu     |