HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: bumperstickers
From: hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Anthony 'SCHWAibo' Hobbs)
Date: 8 Oct 92 20:30:55 NZST
Organization: Chief Lord High Priest, ACCGEK
NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

In article <1992Oct8.021507.15285@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca>, huang@mwilliams.eche.ualberta.ca () writes:
> I saw two bumperstickers.  One reads "Friends don't let friends vote
> Democrat," and the other, "Vote Republican.  Your country is a
> terrible thing to waste."  Too bad that you Quayle bashers have no
> friends.

According to the last polls, over half of all Americans wh plan to bother to 
vote are our friends. How many friends do YOU have, monkey boy?
-- 
"Look over there! See that man on the bus! Is he looking at you... PARANOIA!"

Anthony Hobbs		SCHWAibo		    hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Chief Lord High Priest, ACCGEK - Hail Frozen Yoghurt - Snuggles Loves You
DISCLAIMER: I am not Romanian and was not head of the Securitate for 15 years.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: huang@mwilliams.eche.ualberta.ca ()
Subject: test
Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 03:24:19 GMT

This is just a test.  Please ignore.
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: more bashing
Date: 8 Oct 92 18:16:12 GMT
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

huang@mwilliams.eche.ualberta.ca () writes:
>
> Can those Quayle bashers find some place else to masturbate?  This
> place is santified for the genuine fan of The Honourable J. Danforth
> Quayle.  Please return to the original intent.  Thanks.  
>

    What does "santified" mean?  I can't find it in OED (that, huang, is a
BIG BOOK with LOTS of words).

-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ.
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bush debating
Date: 12 Oct 92 20:44:55 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1992Oct12.192350.25775@netcom.com> madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann) writes:

>wedding anniversary.  Pity no one nailed Bush for that nasty convention
>in Houston or on the abortion issue.
>

hate to be too technical and political here, but Perot did nail Bush for the
convention, or at least P Buchanon's speech, saying something like "When i
heard someone at the podium and on nation tv preaching hate like that,
I would have yanked him off the stage right then."

does anyone else remember this backhanded jab. im sure i garbled the quote
a little, but the intent is the same......

r
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: debates
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 92 11:50:28 CDT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Anthony 'SCHWAibo' Hobbs) writes:

> In article <92281.201259KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>, Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu
>
> > Most expect Gore to massacre Quayle.  I expect Quayle to destroy Gore, by
> > simply quoting his book and exposing him for the wacko-environmentalist
> > liberal he is.
>
> You wanna bet on that? I'm sure 90% of a.f.d-q readers will take you up on it
>

The underlying assumption that Our Boy has a chance against Gore lies in two
areas, the accuracy of which are dubious:

1.  That Our Boy has read Gore's book, and is capable of comprehending a
briefing on the subject in general.  (_Doonesbury_ is probably not too far off
the mark on this one...)

2.  Once briefed, Our Boy is able to string together one or more coherent
sentences on the topic of the environment.

If Dano follows his normal strategy of merely repeating what his handlers tell
him, it's gonna be fun.




|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:5197 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6589
From: kb4c+@andrew.cmu.edu (Karin Brennan)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: A Technical Request
Date: 9 Oct 92 19:05:21 GMT
	<1992Oct7.151842.17048@news.uiowa.edu>
Organization: Design, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


 williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams) says of R.L.:

  < He is a self serving egotist who has no real agenda other than baiting
   <   liberals and making money.

I agree with you 100%.  
My question is- What's wrong with it?  What do you think Phil Donahue
does for a living?  Also, What's wrong with making money?  Is it really
the root of all evil?  
I think it's time to dust off your copy of "Atlas Shrugged"  (Ayn Rand)
and  see what direction we're heading.
Respectfully,
kb
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: esp51@cas.org ()
Subject: Re: debates
Organization: Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 14:02:19 GMT

>
>Most expect Gore to massacre Quayle.  I expect Quayle to destroy Gore, by
>simply quoting his book and exposing him for the wacko-environmentalist
>liberal he is.


Kurt Ludwick (offspring of 10 generations of cousin Republiclones) writes:
(see above)

   I suspect the Danster will do better than expected.  He will read all
the latest Tom Clancy and Louis L'Amour novels, play a round of golf,
eat a potatoe, have bondage with his mother, and recall all that
he learned in public school.  After a prep. like that, what chance
does Gore have?

Scott Park

Opinions are mine, I do not represent my company as spokesman.
From: std_puckett@hg.uleth.ca
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: vote for dan
Date: 15 Oct 92 21:11:57 GMT
Reply-To: std_puckett@hg.uleth.ca
Organization: University of Lethbridge

i'd vote for dan if i could but i cant because i'm a canuck

john
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:5489 alt.politics.bush:9429 alt.politics.clinton:10839
From: ralph@cbnewsi.cb.att.com (ralph.winslow)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Intellectual props for debate
Date: 8 Oct 92 17:11:22 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <Yeoq1Xe00WBK06f9Rc@andrew.cmu.edu> "Marcie G. Mastracci" <mm40+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>I read this little gem in the New York Times the other day.
>
>It seems that the Quayle people and the Gore people met recently to work
>out the details of the upcoming debate.  The Quayle handlers wanted to
>know if props were acceptable.  They had a notion that Quayle would wave
>around a copy of Gore's book on the environment and perhaps read some
>"incriminating" passages from it on the air.  The Gore people said that
>would be fine as long as Gore could hold up a potato.
>
PLEAS!!  Let's be kind to J. Dimfroth.  I think that if he wants to win
the debate with Al he should insist on an Uzi as his prop (or is that
Uzee?).  I can hardly waite.
From: bill@cognet.ucla.edu (William M. Eldridge)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: New Quayle Quote
Keywords: The usual
Date: 15 Oct 92 18:41:54 GMT
Organization: UCLA Cognitive Science Research Program

train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge) writes:
>  Stockdale.

>  At a ceremony marking the 10th anniversary of the Job Training Partnership
>  Act, which Quayle helped sponsor when he was a senator, the vice president
>  said the program was based on the philosophy that 'if you give a person a
>  fish, they'll fish for a day.  But if you teach the person to fish, they'll
>  fish for a lifetime.'

>  What Quayle had in mind, presumably, was the adage: 'Give me a fish, and
>  I'll eat for a day; teach me to fish, and I'll eat for a lifetime.'" 

Well the press obviously doesn't understand Indiana accents.
What Quayle really said was:
    "If you give a parson a fidget, they'll fidget for a day. But if
you teach a parson to fidget, they'll fidget for a lifetime."

Next time, verify your quotes, or I'll do it for you.

-- 
{{{{ bill eldridge                                       x                }}}}
{{{{ bill@cognet.ucla.edu    310-206-3960               xxx              }}}}
{{{{ ~more, ~better, ~faster [80's motto]                x              }}}}
{{{{ ~hot, ~toxic, and ~shallow [90's motto]                              }}}}
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: stuartz@sco.COM (Stuart Zimny)
Subject: Re: What's the deal?
Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 00:25:47 GMT


In article <1992Oct4.222251.3951@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>Gee, the name of this group is alt.fan.dan-quayle, but all I see are Quayle
>bashes here.  Could somebody direct me to a group where Republican policies
>and characters are discussed in a more friendly manner?

Try alt.crypto-facist.

-- 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Stuart Zimny
Internet: stuartz@sco.COM                             SCO Technical Staff 
UUCP    : ...!{uunet}!sco!stuartz            

"The Lord gives me grace and the Devil gives me style"
                                   -Gambel Rogers

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rod@unislc.uucp (Robert Despain)
Subject: Re: The Last Word on "Potatoe".
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 02:20:51 GMT

Mark E. Mallett (mem@mv.mv.com) wrote:
: In article <1992Oct8.133455.11186@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
: leisti@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Teemu Leisti) writes:

[Much deleted that had nothing to do with spelling or potatoes.]

Silly me: I was hoping that this *would* be the *last* word on
"Potatoe" and would point out the obvious (if you don't believe
it's obvious, go back and look at the tv coverage or just the
coverage in the a.f.dq Quote File): it's not enough to show that
the spelling "potatoe" is/was right; you've got to demonstrate
Danoe's claim that the spelling "potato" is wrong.

[If this point was made earlier in this thread, blame the quick
expiration of news on my machine or the quicker expiration of my
remaining neurons.]

Cheers,
R.O.
--
R.O. Despain                  |
Mature Products Group         |  Internet: rod@unislc.slc.unisys.com
(801) 594-4633                |      UUCP: ...!{sun, uunet}!unislc!rod
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The Veep Debate
Date: 14 Oct 1992 20:57:05 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann) writes:

>Since Quayle was hoping to set low expectations, he came off very well
>against them.  His stated intent was to stir up doubts about Bill
>Clinton and he was able to deliver his message.  I'd say Gore won the
>debate, in terms of articulating his solutions and staying on point,
>but Quayle succeeded in doing the job he was sent to do.

An apt summary.  

I'd like to add that Gore missed a golden opportunity:

Quayle kept coming back to "do you trust Bill Clinton?"

Well, I think Gore - who has a high trust factor - could have done
much to diffuse that issue if (on the 5th or 6th time Quayle repeated 
that same question) he had answered:

Well, Dan, the American people will tell us who they trust on
November 3rd.  But I'll tell you right now, I trust Bill Clinton.

Too bad Al missed the opportunity....

							--  Michal
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann)
Subject: Re: bumperstickers
Organization: Society for Putting THings on Top of Other Things 
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 22:03:00 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.155622.7159@u.washington.edu> sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) writes:

>Several of us have received nasty personal e-mail messages
>from this geek.  Try not to be too hard on him;
>I have learned that "human" is his second species.

Hey, so I wasn't singled out!  Good to know.  My nastygram said
Bill Clinton is going to poke teenage girls in the White House.
I told him that the a.f.d-q contingent was waiting for him to
post that silly allegation in public, instead of the cowardly
email attacks.

Anyway, he also referred to the "Honourable J. Danforth Quayle."
Shouldn't that be "Honoerable"?

<snicker>

-- 
Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer.  Take your pick.

Centigram Communications Corp, San Jose California  408/428-3553
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: Re: Undercurrent of Panic
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 17:52:06 GMT

Daniel A Ashlock writes:

>In article <1992Oct8.143328.26592@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>,
>pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh) writes:
>> Cindy Kandolf writes:
>> 
>> >Daniel A Ashlock writes:
>> >>   Did you see the nitwit who is trying to make something of
>>                      ^^^^^^
>> >>Clinton's student trip to Moscow?  Not on UseNet, but out in
>> >>what we whimsically refer to as reality?
>> 
>> Apparently, as of yesterday, the nitwit to whom you refer goes by the name
>> George Herbert Walker Bush.

>   Interesting.  The story I saw had some minor congressional figure
>who looked like a floridated water conspiracy theorist talking about
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>it.  Bush is apparently screamingly desperate for issues that don't
>reflect badly on him.  I have to wonder why he picked this one, vis:

  (etc.)

Yikes!  Do you remember the following line:

  "Mandrake, have you ever heard of fluoridation?"

If GHWB starts talking about precious bodily fluids, I'm grabbing a shovel
and heading for the hills!   :-)

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
Organization: City University of New York/ University Computer Center
Date: Wednesday, 30 Sep 1992 13:21:15 EDT
From: Brian Taylor <MSIMS@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle is more charitable than Gore
 <VZ6wRB3w165w@monsoon.com>

In article <VZ6wRB3w165w@monsoon.com>, sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta) says:
>
>wag5@quads.uchicago.edu (john peter wagner) writes:
>
>>       I lov it! Once again you Democrats, liberals, basically
>> cowardly scum of the Earth once again make a personal attack on
>> an opposing viewpoint! What is this, Krystalnacht?  Who are the
>> fascists!  Attack me personally, you damned dogs of scum and cowardice,
>> and I will take you ALL to your graves!
>
>Yes, truly this is a well-reasoned and cogent analysis of the facts
>that is completely devoid of personal attacks.
>
>>
>>                                       John Peter Wagner
>> P.S. Pardon the bellicosity.


   And so well-mannered too...

  Brian
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bender@riscee.pko.dec.com (Patricia Bender)
Subject: Re: Stockdale
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard MA
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 20:30:06 GMT

In article <ukaNsB3w165w@cybernet.cse.fau.edu> dascoser@cybernet.cse.fau.edu (david serchay) writes:
>Tell me, did Admiral Stockdale remind anyone else of "Old Indy" from the 
>Young Indiana Jones Chronicals
>"Stop bickering you two! Why when I was running a community in  Veitnam 
>...," :)
>
>Dascoser
>
>20 days and counting

I thought the same thing!


{warning: this is a little below the belt.}
You know that sports shoe commercial (Nike or Reebok) where the lady is
hitting tennis balls and the faces of people who were annoying her appeared 
on the tennis ball and then she would whack the ball?  Well, after the debate,
I kind of thought of Quayle as that annoying little yapping dog.

Also, was it just my TV reception or was Quayle's right eyebrow missing?  I
looked at the screen from about 3 inches and still couldn't locate his eyebrow.
It was probably just my reception.


patricia

BTW, the latest Hawaii gaffe is in the newest Newsweek.
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: debates
Date: 8 Oct 92 19:35:42 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>At least, I -hope- he makes it perfectly clear that not all scientists
							 ^^^
>believe 'the sky is falling', as Chicken Little Gore would have us believe.

Dr. Frankenstein, have you been indulging in independent thought *again*?!


								--  M.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: We invite you to consume mass quantities (was Re: Fathers, abortion)
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 14:45:26 GMT

"Brewmeister" points out the following curiosity in someone else's post:

>In article <1992Oct7.014947.5386@midway.uchicago.edu> wag5@midway.uchicago.edu writes:

>>He can do nothing to protect it.  It seems the man is the one being
>>prevented from chosing the destiny of his offspring by law.  The Republicones
>								  ^^^^^^^^^^^^?
>>would simply not have the feds interfere whatsoever in the matter of abortion.
>>But the Demos would give complete power to the woman. I would call that

Well, this could explain a lot!  The GOP's been taken over by visitors from
Remulac!  I THOUGHT there was something otherworldly about that convention
of theirs!

So, I wonder how Dan feels about unmarried couples playing the old ring-toss
game?

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu

  "Where?"
  "France."
From: gnat@stein.u.washington.edu (L Boyd)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Deer quote
Date: 16 Oct 92 17:46:01 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Washington

erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) writes:


>rdetweil@boi.hp.com (Richard Detweiler) writes:

>> I know it wasn't meant distastfully or anything but I thought I'd point
>> out that the Admiral has difficulty standing as a result of the torture
>> he underwent in Viet Nam.  From what I understand it is painful for him
>> to remain standing in one position too long.  Why they coundn't have 
>> provided him with a stool, I don't know.  Then again, maybe he didn't
>> want one either.


I met the Admiral many years ago.  Probably the reason he didn't get
a stool is that one leg is fused -- it's locked in a straight position.
My guess is that he's in a great deal of pain most of the time and 
sitting on a stool (if he could) wouldn't help.

He was horribly tortured in Vietnam.  They broke both of his kneecaps
and neither healed very well.  They also yanked both arms out of their
sockets and did a host of other things to him...

An honorable man, but I am not going to vote for them.

Lauren
From: leo@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (leonard.oppenheimer)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: New Quayle Quote (NY Times, 10/7/92)
Date: 9 Oct 92 16:58:55 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Oct09.155707.22922@ux1.cts.eiu.edu> cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black) writes:
>In article <1992Oct9.151104.14375@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> leo@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (leonard.oppenheimer) writes:
>>
>>I am the first to admit that Quayle has had some bad goofs, like potato etc.
>>However, I find that:
>>
>>a) He almost always seems to come out on the correct and proper side of the
>>issues that he has dealt with, and has been a consistent and steadfast
>>supporter of those causes that would bring this country back to to its
>>senses from many of the excesses of the loony left.  On the issues of legal
>>reform, family values, support for Israel, and the importance of free
>>enterprise, he has been an important advocate of mainstream American values.
>
>    "Correct and proper", huh?  According to whom?  *You*?  Your use of
>catchphrases like "looney left" and "family values" identifies you as
>another republiclone non-entity, IMNSHO.
>

I guess, then, that Clinton & Gore and all the others at the Democratic
Convention who kept invoking family values are "republican non-entities" as
well, IYNSHO.

Perhaps "loony left" was a mistake on my part.  However, What I was saying,
and now re-iterate, is that Quayle has stood up for the types of values that
mainstream America has always, and continues to stand for, while his critics
are busy using invective, cheap-shot sarcasm, and misquotation to obfuscate
the issues.

>>b) The media (and this newsgroup) are extremely unfair to him.  As has been
>>stated many times, Murphy Brown is a perfect example.  The issue was so
>>twisted and convoluted, and so different from the thrust of what was an
>>excellent speech with an important message, that it was truly deplorable to
>>anyone with a sense of fair play.
>
>    Amazing!  These JDQ-defenders tend to come around just often enough to
>keep things lively.  Do you guys communicate with each other and take turns
>coming to Our Boye's rescue?
>

An excellent retort.  Well reasoned, cogent and to the point.
From: hatton@socrates.ucsf.edu (Tom Hatton)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Undercurrent of Panic
Date: 9 Oct 92 06:39:15 GMT
Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab

danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock) writes:
> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Man, if there is an "undercurrent of panic" among conservatives,
>> then there is stark raving lunacy occurring among liberals. 

>   Did you see the nitwit who is trying to make something of 
>Clinton's student trip to Moscow?  Not on UseNet, but out in
>what we whimsically refer to as reality?  Apparently we should
>put FBI watchdogs on anyone who has ever been to Russia.

>   I think his specific allegation was that since the Russian
>Security Aparatus contacted many foreigners that visited 
>Russian they May Well Have Contacted Slick Willie (shocked
>gasp.

>   While this is a little more complex than the Quayl reasoning
>we all know and love it makes me think Danoe is infectious.  He
>is the source of the nitwititis that seems to be descending on
>what used to be a real political party.

>   I knew a couple Russians once, am I tainted?

I drank vodka once. Does that count?

Maybe that's how the dirty tricks committee came up with this one.
"God, this is pathetic. We're grasping at straws."
"Yeah, straws... anybody got a drink?"
"Yeah, pass the Stoli.. Hey - Russia! Why didn't we think of
this before! Has he ever been there?"
"Great, let's pretend he was working to help the Evil Empire!"
... 

It reeks of desperation.

Tom
From: shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The Veep Debate
Date: 16 Oct 92 12:48:42 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

erics@netcom.com (Eric Smith) writes:

>peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:

>Didn't Bush make a pledge in his 1988 campaign to create a million
>new jobs, or some number like that? I can't understand why Clinton
>and Gore have failed to bring this up as an example of Bush's failed
>rhetoric.

I heard George Bush promise us - get ready - 30 million new jobs in
8 years. So, he actually hasn't broken his promise.  See, according
to his plan, everything will come together 6 months before the end
of the last year of his second term (he hopes), so if we are don't
have the patience to let him do his job, then its our own fault.
Things worth having are worth waiting for.

NOT!!!

Throw the bum out!

He had his chance, he blew it, he's out!

 -- 
Susan R. Hagan (shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu) 
Publications Coordinator - User Services
Rutgers University Computing Services
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle