HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 13:19:43 CST
From: Alizon Elliott <U23915@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: BABYLON 5 vs ST:DSN - THE DEBATE BEGINS!
 <1992Nov15.205429.1@uwovax.uwo.ca> <Bxv8MH.9sx@cmptrc.lonestar.org>

In article <Bxv8MH.9sx@cmptrc.lonestar.org>, brad@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Brad
Barton) says:
>
>In article <1992Nov15.205429.1@uwovax.uwo.ca> 4224_5201@uwovax.uwo.ca (Dark   d
>Lor
>of the Sith) writes:
>>
>>"But what does God want with a star ship?"
>>                            Spock
>                             ^^^^^
>Not trying to flame you, but Kirk said this.
>
>--
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-
>|                    Brad Barton -- brad@cmptrc.lonestar.org
>|
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>| "No matter how hard you throw a dead fish into the water, it still won't
>|  swim."                                                  -- Marian Stevens
>| "I never lie when I have sand in my shoes, Commodore."   -- Geordi LaForge
                                              ^^^^^^^^^

Not to flame you or anything, but wasn't this said to Centurion Baccra(sp?) ?

                                   Alizon Elliott
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: QL:MERCHANDISE
From: <DEC113@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:22:42 EST
Organization: Penn State University

    I only seen a few new types of merchandise for QL like the calander, mugs,
comics, and t-shirts.  What I think would be a great product would be a QL
 card series.  I collect non-sports cards and the market is really booming so
 if there is anyone with connections send this idea along to someone who can do
 something about it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dennis Crissman -who is about to be thrown off the computer system by the
 university.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: jblum@next00clab.wam.umd.edu (The Maven)
Subject: Re: highlander - humph
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:01:08 GMT

In article <By0vHt.C1B@news.cso.uiuc.edu> ses52823@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu  
(Marius   ) writes:
> Sandman may have a point here...
 
> What if Duncan meets an immortal (Kurgen, for example) and is led into
> a church and baited to attack?  McLeod might not know about holy ground,
> or might not care if sufficient impetus were provided (like Kurgen  
killing
> someone close to him)... 

[...scene deleted...]

Hmm, not bad.  Of course, we know Duncan knows about holy ground, after
all he built his "retirement home" on it in the first episode.

Then again... does he know what exactly is / isn't holy ground?  We
know it doesn't necessarily have to be Christian... so would an altar
to assorted Dark Gods count?  Maybe Duncan could find out the place
was holy AFTER the battle...
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: laura@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Laura M. Edwards)
Subject: Highlander reruns?
Originator: laura@space2
Organization: Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, Nashville, TN, USA
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 00:15:49 GMT

Anybody know when/if they're going to do reruns?  I've missed the premier and
and one with the Oriental doctor, I think that's all.  Thanks!
From: donnell@manowar.micro.umn.edu (BogusMan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: day of the triffid(s)?
Date: 22 Nov 92 17:36:10 GMT
Article-I.D.: news2.1992Nov22.173610.21843
Organization: none

In article <1992Nov18.102129.1@indyvax.iupui.edu> ecohn@indyvax.iupui.edu writes:
>In article <1ecpooINN20n@agate.berkeley.edu>, pete@plutonium.CChem.Berkeley.EDU (Pete Goodeve) writes:
>> In article <17016@umd5.umd.edu> jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...) writes:
>>>In article <1e7o6fINN6a9@agate.berkeley.edu> pete@plutonium.CChem.Berkeley.EDU (Pete Goodeve) writes:
>>>
>>>>The first was a bloody awful one -- made in the early '60s, I'd guess --
>>>>starring Howard Keel.
>>>
I don't know about that. I saw it as a kid, and it scared the pants off me
and my parents! In fact, that is why I started reading John Wyndham. It is
not the same, but it isn't bad...

>>>Also starring a young Carole Anne Ford, from the original Doctor Who cast.
>>>She screamed a lot, as I gather.
>> 
>> That throws my estimate of `early 60s' off a bit then...  I guess she was
>> 16 or 17 in '63 Dr Who, and couldn't have been more than 12 in the movie.
>> Which makes the latter '58 or '59 at the latest.
>
>Carole Anne Ford was about 22 when she first appeared in "Doctor Who".
>
>Ellen - the crime doctor
>

According to the "Psychotronic Encyclopedia Of FilM" by Michael Weldon,
the film was released in 1963, so you had it right the first time.

					--Judex--
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: baylor@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Subject: Re: QL: Two-Faced Reviews: Trilogy I
Reply-To: baylor@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 02:03:24 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.023431.8909@grebyn.com>, billones@grebyn.com (Jeremy Billones) writes:
>
>This posting contains spoilers for the 11/17 episode of Quantum Leap.


>Wow.
>
>In the first 15 minutes, I was wondering if the girl could see Al; she
>certainly couldn't see Sam, so it seemed unlikely.  But in the last 15,
>either that kid got an awful lot of clues, or she could sense Al somehow.
>Certainly food for thought.  [Of course, the fact that Meg Foster could
>see both Sam and Al is beyond dispute.  It's those eyes :-]

I kinda figured that the girl's response was the same as those
reputed subliminal messages in advertising; She didn't KNOW she heard
him, but she heard him anyway, either because she isn't that much 
older than the age of innocence, or because she really IS a few 
marbles short. Sam & Al were probably hoping (maybe without believing)
for that kind of effect, else Sam wouldn't have had Al go to her, and 
Al wouldn't have kept shouting.

>
>Question - can this be considered the definitive answer to "What happens
>if Sam gets killed while leaping?"  (The Big Man Upstairs pulls the ripcord,
>and the other poor shmuck bites it.  Probably.)
>
I dunno. Remember that in at least one sense Sam had also accomplished
his mission (saving the kid), and the sheriff had been slated to die, 
anyway.  If Sam hadn't succeeded, or if Sam's own failure had caused
the death when it wouldn't have happened in the original history, 
then what?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: ses52823@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Marius   )
Subject: Re: highlander - humph
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 06:46:41 GMT

This is what I get for not watching the premiere...

It makes sense to me, then, that Duncan would never allow the holy ground
scene to take place.  And my previous attempt at literary greatness was
null and void.

But possibly Duncan might *want* to end this charade?  And knew there was
at least a chance if he were to battle on consecrated soil?

Or maybe Kurgen being part of an elaborately laden ruse to attract him
onto said holy ground so that Duncan could achieve these ends...?

I would put it past every other immortal, but Duncan, as I've said, is
considerably more human than the others...

Well well well.

* * * * * *

Marius
ses52823@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu

* * * * * *
.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
From: rck1@ellis.uchicago.edu (roberta chi-woon kwong)
Subject: QL: "Trilogy Part 1": observations
Reply-To: rck1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 04:43:38 GMT

*SPOILERS* for "Trilogy Part 1" below...


Well, as the story's not finished, I don't have a whole lot to say
about it. But, if the first part suceeds in making me want to hang
on and see the rest (which it certainly did), then I'd call "Part
1" very good.

Some disjointed observations below :-)

Did they ever show the true title of "Part 1" in the beginning (not
the "Trilogy Part 1" screen, I mean)? I was looking for it, since I
couldn't remember it (yes, I do read the memos :-) but I could
easily have missed it...And while "Trilogy" is an apt title, it
isn't quite descriptive...

Very good, very chilling background music. And for some reason I
really liked the "Trilogy Part 1" screen at the beginning.

Maybe I was seeing things, but weren't there a lot of return guest
stars in this one? I wasn't paying attention to the "Guest
Starring" part of the opening credits, but...Wasn't the woman who
played "Sam's" housekeeper the same woman who played Ada in
"Justice"? Didn't the actor who played the attorney also appear as
the sheriff in "Good Night, Dear Heart"? (And speaking as a former
"Young Riders" addict, it was nice to see Travis Fine again...in a
speaking role...with hair...!)

About the ending (pre-leap-out): So, Abigail's father still dies in
the fire? Yeah, it made for a *lot* of tension in those last few
minutes, but I couldn't help feeling sorry for the man. One second,
he's in the Waiting Room, the next he's meeting a fiery death. Did
he ever have time to realize that his daughter had been saved?
Quick and painless maybe, but in the original history at least he'd
died *knowing* at least he'd tried to save his daughter. Now, it
seems he probably dies without ever even knowing what for.

What *I* wanted to see was Al's reaction just after Sam leaped.
Assuming that Sam didn't leap instantaneously into Will, and
assuming that Al "appeared back" in the IC after Sam leaped
out (since there is no longer a brainwave connection), would the
technology at PQL allow them to tell whether Sam survived
that last leap or not? Even if the leapee did return to his own
time, could Sam have leaped out too late and *still* not have made
it? Obviously *we* know the answer to that one, but would the PQL
staff know? At least Al wouldn't; not in those first few moments
after the leap-out at the very least...

I liked this first part, in general; it was intense, gripping, and
thoroughly unpredictable (but seeming to actually *lead* somewhere,
as each new plot point was introduced); as a set-up, it's
effective. It's slightly too much on the creepy side for my taste,
but that's just personal, and in no way detracts from it being a
good story.

Now we'll just have to wait another week...


Robin C. Kwong ("er)
                                Leapers do it in various degrees!
                                Observers do it imagingatively!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: glover@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Eric Glover)
Subject: Re: BABYLON 5 vs ST:DSN - THE DEBATE BEGINS!
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:19:28 GMT

In article <75564@hydra.gatech.EDU> ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz) writes:
>In article <By06EF.3wA@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> flip@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Phillip D. Russell) writes:
>
>>Did anyone else find it strange that the subject was brought up by
>>Kirk in the first place?
>
>>I find it "logical" for Spock to question the being, not Kirk.
>
>Oh, so when Spock is around, no one else is allowed to come to any
>logical conclusions?  What happens when you get two Vulcans together?
>Who gets to ask the logical questions then?  The older one?
>
>>Probably had something to do with Shatner writing and directing this
>>movie. 8-)

[insightful comments deleted]

the important thing here is not what was said but what was meant... And 
when I saw that scene I knew exactly what Kirk was really saying --
"What does God need with *MY* starship"  :).

That is *perfectly* in character for Jim Kirk, and a good line.


All in all you just have to love STV, if nothing more than for the one
liners.



Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.tv:5008 rec.arts.tv:21964
From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: QL: "DUfE": observations
Date: 16 Nov 92 03:34:55 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <1992Nov12.232417.21328@midway.uchicago.edu> rck1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <l+dqfh@lynx.unm.edu> kbos@carina.unm.edu (Kurt "Some Guy" Bose) writes:



>>Anyone else think they should have made Donna the Evil Leaper?  :)

>Ooh, ouch. I don't like Donna, but *ouch* anyway. Although...hmm...
>come to think of it, this would be, to put it mildly,
>interesting... :-)

On a slight tangent...

I smell fan fiction here, folks!  Consider the tried-and-true premise of
"a leap into last week" -- Sam leaps into the immediate past of the
Project.  Imagine the look on his face when he meets Donna and finds out
(again) she's his wife.

Imagine the NEXT look on his face when he kisses her -- and she morphs
into Alia...

*grin* oh boy oh boy oh boy...
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: ed@cwis.unomaha.edu (Dusk Thornwell)
Subject: DEEP SPACE NINE preview on QVC: 12/5
Keywords: dsn qvc oic
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 23:30:35 GMT

Just thought I'd post a reminder that QVC (Quality Value Channel, home
shopping) will be having a 2 hour STAR TREK: Deep Space Nine preview on
Saturday, December 5, at 2pm EST.  
 
I read about this in the back of Starlog or some such sci-fi mag while
at the hobby store the other day.  
 
Anyone have any more info on this?
 
...e

--
::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::|   ed   |  death 
  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  |  @cwis |  comes 
::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::|.unomaha|    too 
  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  |  .edu  |   soon 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Subject: Re: QL - Trilogy 1 <spoilers>
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 09:29:11 GMT

In article <Nov.17.21.24.20.1992.5273@gandalf.rutgers.edu> finifter@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Tracy E. Finifter) writes:
>Since I never know how much I'm going to say in my first impressions,
>spoiler protection follows:

>Now we have the first
>in a three part series of episodes focused around the murders of Violet and
>Bart Aider.

Actually, I like it.  Not all problems in a life can be fixed in one blow,
but Sam still leaps when he changes history significantly (where
"significantly" means "either when the story is over, or it would be to best
dramatic effect" :)).  So, here we have a case where he doesn't fix the
basic *problem* (namely, that Abigail is a rather disturbed and troubled
young girl, who desperately needs a lot of stability and love), but he does
change history by saving her life.  (Presumably not the life of the sheriff,
though; he leaped out just in time.  Pretty unfair for the sheriff, though.)

We'll see how parts two and three go, but I'm pretty hopeful.

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "Time and space is a bitch!"
sef@kithrup.COM  |    -- Gooshie (Dennis Wolfberg),
-----------------+       "Quantum Leap:  Killin' Time"
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
From: tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Lady Johanna Constantine)
Subject: QL: The Wrong Stuff actress?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 01:08:21 GMT

I just saw The Wrong Stuff on USA for the first time, and
I know I've seen the actress who played Dr. Ashton before.
I seem to rememebr her from a mini-series aired either by
the BBC or Chanel 4 last September, and it may have been 
an Australian mini-series.  Can anyone help me?  It's
been nagging me since the first time I saw her.  I checked
the episode guide for the guest actors and I think her name
might be Kim Robillard, but I'm not sure if this was her
or not.

thanx

LJC
-- 
Lady Johanna Constantine | "When you remove the pin, Mr Hand
tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu    |  Grenade is no longer your friend"
Founder of the Church of Our Lady of the Perpetually Clueless
Disclaimer: The U of I doesn't give a damn or blast WHAT I do
From: nova@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jennifer Baughman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL: Monday night USA
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:28:50 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

WHAT????????? QL is on USA??????

WHEN?????

And yes, I'm going ballistic 'cause I haven't watched QL in years and I'm 
kicking myself for it!!!!!

__NOVA__
_______________________________________________________________________________

Ziggy ate my .sig.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
From: mhammond@bnr.ca (Mike Hammond)
Subject: Re: QL: References to Magnum, PI
Reply-To: mhammond@bnr.ca
Organization: BNR Ottawa, Fibre Systems Development
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 20:58:15 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.195804.291@cs.tulane.edu>, ps70awg@rs1.tcs.tulane.edu (mel rupinski) writes:
|> 
|> I was just watching "Permanent Wave" on USA last night, and I noticed
|> that in the scene where Sam, Laura, Kyle and Chloe were in Frank's 
|> apartment (right before the sniper shot at them), Magnum, PI was
|> playing on the tv.  I know of two other Magnum references offhand:
|> 
|> 	"Play it again, Seymour" -- In the cab scene with Seymour, Sam
|> 	  	mentioned Magnum with a group of other PI's
|> 		(Sam Spade, Phillip Marlowe, etc.)
|> 
|> 	"Genesis" (?) -- When Sam is trying to remember his family,
|> 		he mentions that his sister is married to Jim Bonneck,
|> 		a naval officer in Hawaii.  In Magnum, Bonneck was
|> 		a naval "con-man" that Magnum thought was Mac 
|> 		(after Mac died in a car-bomb explosion), who became
|> 		a recurring character on the show.
|> 
|> Does anyone know of any other references to Magnum, PI (or any other of
|> Don B's shows, for that matter)?  I think this is pretty interesting. . .
|> 
|> Thanks ----
|> 
|> mtr

Well, there's the obvious:

	``Another Mother''--At one point in time, the elder sister is
                 watching it on TV, and makes a comment about Magnum
                 to her brother.

Anything else?
-- 
(By the way, please don't try to e-mail me between September and December
1992, because I won't receive it. Please post any responses instead.
Thanx. (However, feel free to e-mail any flames! :-) :-)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|      Mike Hammond      | ``Yes, I'm...too wascally for Bugs Bunny,  |
|     BNR Ottawa, and    |   Too wascally for Bugs Bunny,             |
| Co-op Student from the |   So wascally...it's almost funny!''       |
| University of Waterloo |                        Right Said Fudd,    |
|      Math Faculty      |                      ``I'm Too Wascally''  |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
From: tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Lady Johanna Constantine)
Subject: QL: Cancellation....
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 22:05:25 GMT

I've been reading everyone's posts, and how some feel it would be
better to wrap things up than continue they way things have been
going, qualitywise.

All I can say is, a bad episode of QL is still better than everything
esle out there.

No one know the future except Ziggy maybe, and I'd miss Scott and Dean if it
stopped now.

What can I say, I live in hope...

LJC
-- 
Lady Johanna Constantine | "When you remove the pin, Mr Hand
tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu    |  Grenade is no longer your friend"
Founder of the Church of Our Lady of the Perpetually Clueless
Disclaimer: The U of I doesn't give a damn or blast WHAT I do
From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Otherworld
Date: 23 Nov 92 00:36:04 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <1992Nov20.211238.2179@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> swardwel@nyx.cs.du.edu (Stephanie  Wardwell) writes:
>And better news yet.  It's one of the upcoming Series Collection series on
>the Sci-Fi channel.  The con rep didn't say when, but definitely in the
>future, along with Manimal and Probe (okay, who remembers *that* one?)

Ooooh, I do!!!  And I loved it!  Wonder if it aged well...

I've still got about four episodes on tape, but I'd like to recover the
others.  Considering they were made in mid-'80s, and therefore have the
current-standard amount of commercials, would they be cut?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: ecohn@indyvax.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: QL: Monday night USA
Organization: Purdue University, Indianapolis
Date: 19 Nov 92 14:18:58 -0500

In article <83900@ut-emx.uucp>, nova@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jennifer Baughman) writes:
> WHAT????????? QL is on USA??????
> 
> WHEN?????

Weekdays at 7pm, Eastern, 6pm Central.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: baylor@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Subject: Re: QL: Trilogy, Part I (Book I?)  *SPOILERS, PART I (BOOK I?)*
Reply-To: baylor@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 02:40:17 GMT

In article <20y13af@rpi.edu>, dzembj@jec304.its.rpi.edu (Jason Eric Dzembo) writes:
>In article <1eccpvINNi0k@mozz.unh.edu>, mre@kepler.unh.edu (MikE) writes: 
>|> BTW, who played the leapee's wife?  I heard hear on the net that it was
>|> Meg Foster..."Too weird", as Al would say.
>
>The opening credits had Meg Foster listed separately from the guest cast 
>as a special guest.  I've never heard of her, so I don't know what the big
>thing is about her being a special guest, but I'll presume that she was the
>wife.
>
>						- Jason
She's the wife. She's probably a "special guest" because she has
more of a resume than most of the guest stars (and maybe as compensation
for having no speaking part). But boy, she can do a "space cadet" when
she wants! (Reference: PBS production of "The Scarlet Letter")
From: genef@urbino.orc.olivetti.com (Faktorovich Gene)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: TV Guide on the NET ?
Date: 19 Nov 92 02:06:44 GMT
Reply-To: genef@urbino.orc.olivetti.com (Faktorovich Gene)
Organization: Olivetti Research California

I'm new to this group, so no flames if this has been asked before!!!

Is there an internet address or a bbs where I can find the TV program
listings for this area?

Thanks,

Gene.
From: clintp@PARROT.CREIGHTON.EDU (Clint Pearcy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Quantum Leap tapes
Date: 16 Nov 92 21:06:02 GMT


Is there anyone out there who can send me tapes of this season's
episodes?  The person who's supposed to be taping them for me isn't
very reliable (She's only taped one so far) and I want to know what
you are all talking about!

I can pay for postage and tapes and all that...

Thanks.

Clint Pearcy
clintp@parrot.creighton.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: schuck@fraser.sfu.ca (Bruce Jonathan Schuck)
Subject: Re: Highlander - TV Series (+HL2 *Spoilers* for those who care)
Reply-To: Bruce_Schuck@sfu.ca
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 04:30:18 GMT

jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...) writes:

>>And, yeah, SURE this takes place in New York.  Especially with those Pacific
>>West telephone booths scattered throughout the city...

BC Tel. It's filmed in Burnaby [same studio as MacGyver] BC, and
Vancouver, BC.


Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv