HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: crobbins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Chris S. Robbins)
Subject: Re: AGGIES SUCK!!!
Keywords: ghoti hunting
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 00:35:26 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.234048.21903@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado) writes:
>I recently found this definition of the word Aggie in Webster's dictionary:
>
>Aggie - n. 1. an asshole whose size is so extraordinary that the Eiffel tower
>       fits inside with only moderate lubrication. 2. a large conglomeration
>       of hicks into what has been called a "school". adj. 3 the USUALLY
>       undesirable condition of a part of the body, especially genitalia.
>       usage: Your penis is Aggie.
>
>Kevin
>
>

(I was going to post something, but I fell down laughing, and typing
is too hard right now!!!!)

-Chris


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfrederi@encore.com (Justin Frederich)
Subject: Re: Hail to Those Motherf***ers...
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 01:04:25 GMT

scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn) writes:

>  Mike Doel asks:
>>Any former TBDBITL members wish to post the alternate lyrics to Hail to the
>>Victors or LeRegiment(sp)?

>     Mike! Take back the request! Do you remember how many of the alternate 
>lyrics are outside the bounds of political correctness!? We Buckeyes will get 
>flamed to no end if our horribly redneck verses are posted!
>     OK, OK, I'll put the two I remember up:

Alright you guys , cut out the bullshit !!! You're going to have me
sticking up for Michigan soon !   
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.college:19973 rec.sport.football.misc:527
From: jdng90@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Gorsuch JDN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college,rec.sport.football.misc
Subject: Re: British College League
Date: 16 Nov 92 15:50:11 GMT


 15 November 1992 
   
     Southampton Stags  ..........70
     Bath Killer Bees   .......... 0 

  yep, that's right folks, the Killer Bees first ever game was a bit
of a disaster with the champions scoring no fewer than 10 TD's, and
generally playing very well indeed. All credit to the Bees though,
they played pretty well, maybe the best team we've faced all year, and
if they keep practicing and playing, they may well be a force to be 
reckoned with in the near future. 

  Also, 70pts is a Stags record, eclipsing the previous record (56) 
set three weeks ago against Cardiff, this is now Southamptons 16th
consecutive win, and our ninth consec shut out against league
opponents.  

   I'll post other results and league tables when I get them, probably
on Friday. 

          jon ( jdng90@uk.ac.soton.ecs ) 


P.S. is anybody actually reading this ? If so let me know, otherwise
I'll stop.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Open question to Notre Dame fans
From: William Karamo Motley <wm1o+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 05:06:31 -0500 
 <1992Nov16.161202.12733@hou.amoco.com> <1992Nov21.002146.1045@mailer.cc.fsu.edu><1992Nov21.002347.1106@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>
Organization: Sophomore, Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

In an article <1992Nov21.002347.1106@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> 
zuniga@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Ralph Zuniga (FREAC/CAR)) writes:

>How about if ND drops the Navy game from its schedule, and decides to resume
>series with Miami??? Navy hasn't won a game in this series since the 60's.
>What do you ND'ers think??

I completely agree with you.  ND proves nothing playing a sorry Navy
team.  I always used to look forward to Thanksgiving back in high school
when a few friends and myself would sit down and watch the Miami-ND
match-ups.  It would be nice to have that back.  Also, I think that
atleast 30%-50% if not more of their meetings in the future could have
NC implications.  Lets hope that we get to see if I'm right.

Will
From: RDAY@cmsa.gmr.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: LOOKING FOR POLL RESULTS
Date: 17 Nov 92 14:15:29 GMT
Article-I.D.: cmsa.168A28231.RDAY
Organization: GM Research Labs


I realize this is only Tuesday... did I miss the AP/UP top 25
that is usually posted here???

If I did...would one of you be kind enough to send me this
weeks top 25, or at least the top 10??

Thanx,

Jeff
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: x0y3510@tamuts.tamu.edu (Xuejun Yang)
Subject: Re: AP make FSU #3
Organization: ~/lib/organization
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 20:04:29 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.184647.13276@walter.bellcore.com> lein@cat.uucp (John Leinaweaver) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.154927.26542@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> kkc@nursing.arizona.edu writes:
>>
>>>>AP
>>>>
>>>>1. Miami
>>>>2. Alabama
>>>>3. FSU
>>>>4. Texas A&M
>>>>
>>>>FSU jumps over Texas A&M, with a blow out with Tulane.
>>>>      :
>>>>      :
>>>>      :
>>>>Texas A&M is not happy about the AP polls, but are still in the race.   
>>>>Unless, FSU makes it to #2 and meets Miami in the Fiesta.
>>>>
>>
>>>Couldn't agree with you more, A&M did nothing to merit a drop like that
>>>in the polls. A W is a W and nobody remember how you did it later on. By
>>>the way, how about the rest of the top 25?....
>>>
>>>Dave Elfering
>> 
>> Sure A&M deserves the lower poll ranking than FSU. A&M was unimpressive in 
>> their win over Houston. IMO they do not deserve to be in the top 10. Which top
>> 25 teams have they played so far?
>
>In the past, the ACC champ usualy received little respect - why should it
>change  because it's Florida State.  FSU lost to the only quality team
>they played, beating Tulane and Maryland (with the MO points theory) was
>about as impressive as their win against ACC powerhouse Clemson (a win which
>made the pollsters take them seriously).
>
>
>John L
>
>
If you watched ESPN, you would have seen Lee Corso constantly bashing
A&M in favor of FSU. What makes him suspect is that he is a FSU alumni.
A lot of AP pollsters may have be influenced by his propaganda.



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tja2f@dayhoff.med.Virginia.EDU (Timothy J. Allison)
Subject: Re: Notre Dame vs. Florida State in 1993
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:35:15 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.153544.23819@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick E Fleming) writes:
>Justin Frederich writes:
>
>>Matt, it's like you say ND may get an ugly reception in the South but the
>>game will be in Orlando which at least 200 miles South of Tallahassee.
>
>Let's think about this.  Will moving the game to Orlando change the 
>partisanship such that the crowd will be pro-Notre Dame?  I serriously doubt 
>it.  FSU will still enjoy a very substantial home field advantage.  Further, 
>teh Citrus bowl hold aproximately 10,000 more butts than Doak.  At $25 per 
>butt, that is a substantial piece of change. And you can bet that it isn't all
>going in the pocket of Notre Dame; Florida State will be a big winner 
>money-wise also.
>
 [rest of post deleted]

Perhaps I'm an unusual 'Cane, but I'd bet that Orlando will see its share
of 'Canes for this game.  Since Notre Dame has opted to intentionally leave
Miami off their schedule, it's the best chance of watching the Irish fall.  
While there's no doubt that I'm against FSU during the Miami-FSU games, I have 
the utmost respect for FSU - and would guess that most Miami fans feel the 
same.  Likewise most Miami fans enjoy a good whooping of ND, no matter who
does it.  

>
>     - Pat
>-- 
>- Patrick E. Fleming ---------------------------------------------------------
>- Department of Chemistry ----------- Sometimes I see me as an old manatee ---
>- Ohio Wesleyan University ---------- Heading south as the waters grow colder 
>- pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu -----------------------------------------


Tim Allison
tja2f@virginia.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rszczerb@mauchly.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Subject: Re: Michigan, ND, Miami etc ...
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 17:23:12 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.194623.25840@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>
>Try, they both tied at South Bend, thus the edge to Michigan.  However, 
>Michigan tied Illinois... BUT!!! Notre Dame LOST at home to Stanford, and
>it wasn't even a close game...
>
>-- 
>David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
>VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
>uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
>davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"

Hey Dave,

I think most people with a brain would say that Stanford is a little
bit more competition that Illinois.  Also, the mighty Maize and Blue
narrowly squeaked by Purdue ... 

			- Bring on the Canes in the Fiesta Bowl

					rob
From: sl45z@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Name That Tune 
Date: 19 Nov 92 11:11:19 MDT
Organization: Utah State University


	This is just to display my new signature.  Can anyone name that tune?
-- 
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
     |	Travis L. Clements |   	With all the anger in the land
     |  N. Logan, Utah     |    How long before the judgement day?            
     ----------------------|    Before we cut the Fat Ones* down to size?
    * Miami, A&M, Michigan |    Before the Woofing Gods arrive?
    Notre Dame, Florida St |
|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+||+
From: wft@soda.berkeley.edu (William F. Tell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Cal sucks
Date: 22 Nov 1992 00:33:46 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu

I must agree with this.  In my 4 years at Berkeley, Cal has been
defeated by Stanford.  In 1989 it was a boring 24-14 loss.  In 1990
it was a nightmare at the last second 27-25 loss.  In 1991 it was a
close until the 4th quarter 38-21 loss.  Now we have the ultimate
insult, a 1992 41-21 loss that really wasn't that close, ending a
pitiful 4-7 season.    

Coach Gilbertson should resign as head coach.  

--William F. Tell
UC Berkeley

Newsgroups: osu.sports,rec.sport.football.college
From: jhoskins@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (James M Hoskins)
Subject: Re: no respect for tOSU
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:20:35 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.213256.1591@ryn.mro4.dec.com> murphy@rock.enet.dec.com ()
 writes:
>
>[stuff about inhospitible OSU fans]


Back in the 1970's, the OSU/Mich game sparked annual riots on
High Street.  I am aware of cases where cars with Michigan plates
were attacked by drunk hoards, and in worst cases people beat up.
I am sorry to hear that such activity continues today.  This is
sick lawless behavior that I join the great majority of Ohioans
and Ohio State football fans in completely condemning.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: NCSU: COUNTDOWN TO ORANGE BOWL, THRASHES WAKE 42-24!!
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 03:54:45 GMT

In article <1992Nov22.005131.18955@ncsu.edu> delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE) writes:
>
>
>
>
>  This has been a stellar day for all Wolfpack fans. After leading in the
> game 35-0 at one point, Sheridan was nice, and put in our 2nd stringers...
> Thsi means that an Orange Bowl bid is very possible with these factors:
>
> 1. Miami beats Syracuse.. (done 16-10)
> 2. Alabama loses to Auburn or Florida
> 
>
> Then:
>
> Miami vs. Florida State, Sugar Bowl

No way this matchup will take place... The SEC champ is an automatic
choice for sugar bowl...

> Texas A&M vs. Alabama, Cotton Bowl
> Washington vs. Michigan, Rose Bowl
> Nebraska vs. N.C. State, Orange Bowl

Though it is very possible that Nebraska goes to OB, it is not yet
guarenteed.. They have to win the last two games and one of them is
against Oklahoma!

Also, there are teams like Notre dame, USC, Stanford, Syracuse etc who might
be looked ahead of ACC runner up NC State. These teams should bring in more
fans than NC State.

Very few teams want to say no to a $4.5 mil payoff!

Also, ACC isn't strong enough for the second team to go to OB!

>delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu

Njan
From: jagreath@eos.ncsu.edu (JOSEPH ALAN GREATHOUSE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: ACC (WAS Re: PAC-10 IS WEIRD)
Date: 23 Nov 92 06:08:39 GMT
Reply-To: jagreath@eos.ncsu.edu (JOSEPH ALAN GREATHOUSE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Originator: jagreath@c00100-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu


In article <1992Nov22.214214.10475@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>, sfm@manduca.neurobio.arizona.edu (Stephen Matheson) writes:
>From article <cf3g8mS00iUxA3xUp=@andrew.cmu.edu>,
>by wm1o+@andrew.cmu.edu (William Karamo Motley):

>> Can anyone explain why the PAC-10 is so fucking unpredictable?????????
>> 
>> Will

>Here's a thought: the PAC-10 is full of outstanding football teams.
>"Predictable" football conferences have 2 or 3 good football teams
>and 5-8 creampuffs.

>Besides, who wants predictability?

Gee, sounds just like the ACC.  And you thought we were just a basketball
conference. :)

>--

>Steve Matheson   Program in Neuroscience   University of Arizona
>sfm@neurobio.arizona.edu

-- 
**************************************************************************
*                                                                        *
*  Joseph A. Greathouse            *  All opinions are solely mine.      *  
*  Theta Chi Fraternity            *  A non-hazing, leadership-oriented  *
*  Delta Rho Chapter               *  organization, promoting Alma Mater *
*  North Carolina State University *  and the concept of a Helping Hand. *
*  Final Score:  Wolfpack 31 - Wahoos 7  Go Pack!!!!                     *
**************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: chyang@malay.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang)
Subject: Re: Michigan - National Championship - Not with Moeller
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 13:09:24 EST
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Originator: chyang@malay.engin.umich.edu


In article <Bxv8LG.Fnw@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, jones@venus.iucf.indiana.edu (William P. Jones) writes:
> In article <4=F=CXA@engin.umich.edu>, chyang@exemplum.engin.umich.edu 
> (Chung Hsiung Yang) writes...
> > 
> >	$Cool 6 Mil$ is not bad.  And with a name like Michigan, recruiting
> >is not going to be affected anytime soon.  I think it is more of a business
> >decision than anything else.  Being from Michigan you know how $$$ is more
> >important than Nat Champ.  As far as Athletic DEPT. is concerned Nat Champ
> >is no big deal as long as they have $$$ to support the rest of other sports.
> >It is quite consistent with the programs philosophy.
> > 
> >- Chung Yang
> Michigan does not get $6M for going to the Rose Bowl. The Big 10 gets the $6M 
> and Michigan gets a double share by virtue of going to the bowl (2/11)*$6M.
> And just how many more years is the Rose Bowl going to be able to offer that 
> kind of payout when it is consistently irrelevant to the NC and gets out drawn 
> on TV by the games that are relevant?

	Yes, I stand corrected.  The Big 10 does split the loot.  As far
as the Rose Bowl being able to afford that payout.  Don't worry!  They will
for a long long long long long long long long long long long long long long
time.  There are very rich people behind that festivity.   The only way for
the ROSE BOWL to be insolvent is that if whole SOUTHERN California falls into
the Pacific Ocean because of an Earthquake.  

	The Rose Bowl's got the largest TV market of any BOWLs and a bunch 
of faithfuls around the world.  Especially the BIG-10 and PAC-10 grads who 
are natives of the pacific.  With the caliber and the number of graduates 
that BIG-10 and PAC-10 combined, there will always be a very large demand 
for the game.  

	BTW, the Rose Bowl commity wouldn't be renegotiating a contract with
these two conferences if the business deals are not lucritive.  And they are
extremely lucritive.  BIG-10 and PAC-10 can both have miserable seasons and
end up making tons of money. 

	BTW II, Being able to make MONEY and NC are not that corrolated.
Just look at the TV contract that Notre Dame has.  They can have the most
miserable season that a team can have and still come out of the positive.
Simply because they are Notre Dame.  Same logic with the Rose Bowl.  Who
cares about NC when you have a bunch of BIG10 and PAC10 allums who wants 
the ROSE BOWL.  IT would be nice to have the NC, but it is not necessary
for these Alums to enjoy the game. 

- Chung Yang.
From: landers@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Hazard Class Mage)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Big Ten Review (11-14-92)
Keywords: Big Ten
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:27:43 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

In article <1992Nov17.130709.28177@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>
>Well, I thought Eric Beatty is a senior, too.  This guy led the Big 10 in
>tackles last year and is doing it this year, as well as leading the
>conference in fumble recoveries (he is a LB, by the way).  He will easily
>be on the all-conference team this year.  IMO, they will miss him as much
>as Zgonina - hell, this guy alone accounts for over 1/3 of Purdue's
>tackles, I believe.
>-- 
>
>Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu

Right, right, and right again.  I regret not mentioning him, mea culpa.
Our defense has kicked butt this year, one of the best we've ever had.
Don't think so, ask Tryone Wheatley and Elvis Gerbc!
(Or Hayden Frye and Cal's Gilbertson for that matter).

Defensive Coordinator Moe Ankey has done one hellofa job.
(He's a nice guy too.)

-- 
   <===========================><===============================>
   || Christopher Landers      ||  Stamp Out Silly Signatures! ||
   <============== landers@mentor.cc.purdue.edu ================>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: Big 8 Bowl paranoia
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:17:51 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.171857.25921@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com> m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson) writes:
>--
>>This has been an insane season. Not quite as weird as 1990, when everyone 
>>thought that ND-CU would be a shoo-in for the nat'l championshp and ND lost,
>>and heck, EVERYONE lost, except Ga. Tech. 
>
>>All I can hope is that Gibbs and Collins play the "game to save the coach's 
>>job", that is, beat the living daylights out of Nebraska. And Colorado prove 
>>they belong against Syracuse/ND. 
>
>>And if that doesn't happen, maybe a Tokyo surprise???
>
>It's not a good thing to HAVE to depend on other teams. Especially when OU
>has 3 losses and 2 ties. We won't talk about KSU yet.
>
>Don't kid yourself. CU is not there YET. I did say "YET" not so don't jump all
>over me. If they got spanked, no thrashed and severely punished, 52-7 vs NU
>then how do you think they will do against ND or Syracuse? CU has only played
>one legit top-10 team this year and they were severely exposed. If NU had not
>been upset (and it was a major upset and you know who you are) then the Huskers
>would be top-5 right now. By far the best team CU played.
>
>If I were you I would hope CU does not go to the Orange bowl. They would only
>be exposed again. They will be better next year though.

While I am not trying to find a reason for CU's loss to NU, I might point out
that NU isn't that hot this year, either. Tell me a good team NU has
beaten on the road? They play great football at home, but they are suspect
on road. Also, CU offense is playing much better now that Stewart is the
QB. Now don't tell me that a good QB doesn't matter much, esp with a 
passing offense like CU's. Also, the OL seemed to have stabilized
recently.. they had pretty good running game against both KU and ISU.
So I wouldn't be too surprised if CU wins the bowl games.

About them being good next year, you bet they will.. Almost all the
offense is returning!

>OU is toast friday.

Let's hope for the best :)

>
>Husker Henderson

Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Re: #1 in WAC
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 15:28:14 GMT
Organization: VMARK Software, Inc.

In article <1992Nov16.041052.10479@fcom.cc.utah.edu> jli@bingham.utah.edu (Jianliang Li) writes:
>
>	Suppose after the regular season, the final records look like:
>
>		Hawaii		6-2
>		San Diego St.	6-2
>		BYU		6-2
>		XXX		6-2
>	Who will be WAC Champ?    

San Diego State, as they have beaten both Hawaii and BYU...
-- 
David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mbs@zycor.lgc.com (Matt Shostak)
Subject: Re: Open question to Notre Dame fans
Organization: Landmark/Zycor   Austin, Texas
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 13:41:20 GMT

In article <8f3pibG00iUy40hXxC@andrew.cmu.edu> William Karamo Motley <wm1o+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>In an article <1992Nov21.002347.1106@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> 
>zuniga@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Ralph Zuniga (FREAC/CAR)) writes:
>
>>How about if ND drops the Navy game from its schedule, and decides to resume
>>series with Miami??? Navy hasn't won a game in this series since the 60's.
>>What do you ND'ers think??
>

Miami should also drop their easiest game.



-- 
Matthew B. Shostak              Landmark/Zycor
mbs@zycor.lgc.com               (512) 292-2357
"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the war room!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ejohnson@turinghelios.nd.edu (eric johnson)
Subject: Re: Great Big 8 QBs
Reply-To: ejohnson@turinghelios.nd.edu (eric johnson)
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 17:11:55 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.162700.9201@eng.umd.edu>, edquist@eng.umd.edu (Karl T. Edquist) writes:
|> 
|> In article <1992Nov19.151603.19469@news.nd.edu>, ejohnson@turinghelios.nd.edu (eric johnson) writes:
|> >In article <1992Nov19.143251.8737@sparky.imd.sterling.com>, marko@IMD.Sterling.COM (Mark Olson) writes:
|> >|> In a recent followup, I asked about the status of some of the great OU QBs and
|> >|> I got to thinking that there have been a lot of great QBs in the Big 8, what
|> >|> course did their careers take, and what are they up to now?  I've started a
|> >|> list, anybody know about these players? Anybody have anybody to add?
|> >|> 
|> >
|> >How about:	Vince Ferigamo - NU alum - Former NFL QB - Rams
|> >
|> >Also, wasn't there a Colorado QB (I think he was a QB) that was
|> >pretty good and became a sportscaster for a Denver station. I can't think
|> >of his name
|> 
|> I think you're talking about Bobby Anderson, who played QB in the late 60's, early 70's.
|> He was more of a running QB, but hey, aren't most Big 8 QB's?  He set several CU records,
|> some of which still stand.  He was the MVP of some bowl (Sugar?) when the Buffs
|> beat Alabama in his senior season.  He was drafted by the Broncos and played for couple
|> of seasons, but that's about it for his pro career.
|> 
|> Karl

He's the one... Thanks.

Eric
GO HUSKERS!!! BEAT SOONERS!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college