HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: saal@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (samuel.saal)
Subject: Re: Question to Miracle Analysts
Organization: NetNews Readers Anonymous
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 11:57:25 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.094027.24071@rs.com> horen@rs.com writes:

>I think that it was a message directed to Arafat, himself, that he should
>start travelling by regular commercial carrier, in order to earn those
>Frequent-Flyer miles.

>Do you think he'd've crashed if he'd been flying in a 747? Hell, no! And he
>could have paid for an economy-class ticket and then upgraded to first-class!!

My bet is that Arafat doesn't fly commercial aircraft  because you never
know when one of those crazy Arab terrorists is gonna try blowing the damn
thing up.  That or hijack it.
-- 
Sam Saal      homxb!saal OR saal@homxb.att.com
	Vayiftach HaShem et Peah Ha`Aton
From: shaks@cfa.harvard.edu (Jonathan Schachter)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Pesach/Secretaries Week
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:35:38 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: CfA, Cambridge, Mass.


In article <13APR199215552218@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov>, bschlesinger@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov (Barry Schlesinger) writes:
> 
> 	This question is hardly world-shaking compared to other topics 
> in this forum but....
> 	I'm not sure, but I keep hearing reports that the week of
> April 20-24 is going to be National Secretaries Week -- this year, the
> same week as Pesach.  Now the usual method of observance is to take
> the secretary out to lunch sometime during the week, but eating out
> during Pesach is basically impossible. Anyone have any suggestions? 


  here's a response from our group secretary:

Speaking for myself, just the fact that you acknowledge the approach
of secretaries week/day is nice.  A thank you in the form of flowers,
and/or a card is quite acceptable. If someone really wants to take me
to lunch they could give me a card on Secretary's day and write a note
suggesting lunch at some other more convenient time.
From: saal@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (samuel.saal)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Interrelationship excerpts
Date: 14 Apr 92 11:47:22 GMT
Organization: NetNews Readers Anonymous

Those that pray to the god of pluralism or that eschew any judgementalism
should skip this article.

In article <m0la7b4-00017gC@engr.uark.edu> djb@dberleant.uark.edu
(BERLEANT DANIEL J) writes:

>Interrelationship Excerpts (anonmized) 
>================================

>Shalom Everyone,
>  Here is issue #42. Sorry for the delay. It was partly my fault and
>partly a lack of contributions, but in any event here is the latest! I
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Thank G-d!


>in the spring [if we wanted to wait that long] between the prohibited
>days between Passover and Shavuoth and the prohibited days around

Why does this sound so much like the question of "how do you schecht a
pig?"?

> The choice seems to be a Reform Rabbi, which is acceptable to
>everyone (and the first choice of no one.)  My fiancee and I met with
>a local Reform Rabbi who herself will not perform intermarriages, but
>referred us to two others who will.

And what sanctions will _any_ Reform movement body levy against these
two?

>Moses and Israel".  I'm a little surprised at the cost of the whole
>thing.  The total cost will be $800, which starts with a $150 donation
>to Brandeis Hillel, and also includes $150 for a scribe for the
>in-lieu-of-a-ketuba.

I'd hope the charge would be prohibitive enough to prevent many more
intermarriages.

> He seems a bit more easy-going about things in general.  (He uses an
>English ketubah, leaving the Aramaic side there, but not filled in,
>and substituting "the laws of G-d" for "the laws of Moses and
>Israel".)

If there was ever an example of putting your own will before that of
G-d, this is it.  How, pray, tell, did G-d transmit _these_ particular
laws?
-- 
Sam Saal      homxb!saal OR saal@homxb.att.com
	Vayiftach HaShem et Peah Ha`Aton
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: mer@zurich.ibm.com
Subject: Re: What is the Haftorah on Saturday (April 4)?
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 92 11:38:59 GMT
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research

In  <1992Apr6.212430.28307@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>  buglady@silver.lcs.mit.edu (Aliza R. Panitz) writes:
> To the best of my knowledge, 1 Tishrei is not Rosh Chodesh.  Therefore,
> none of the R"Ch minhagim are relevant.

Well, sort of. They did have to bring the Olah sacrifice of Rosh Chodesh
on 1 Tishri.

Moshe Rappoport
From: unixwiz@mcl.mcl.ucsb.edu (Old Wolf)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Welcome to a New SCJ Reader
Date: 16 Apr 92 21:10:20 GMT

Mazel Tov!!

y'rachmeal laeb simcha ben schlomo akiva
unixwiz@mcl.mcl.ucsb.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: gross@befvax.uchicago.edu
Subject: Re: Abraham
Reply-To: gross@befvax.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago, Dept of Molecular Genetics
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 17:58:55 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.171810.16812@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM>, nabil@ncrcol.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM (Nabil Idriss) writes:
>>Perhaps your friend could contact the Committee to free Syrian and
>>Yemenite Jews. They are being held hostage in their own countries.
>>I believe there are 300 Jews still in Damascus. I have written their
>>LA office to find out how to help gain their release. 
>
>>Not looking for an argument; just practical help.
>>--Michelle
>
There are 4000 Jews in Syria.

>Sorry to post your article here. My E-mail just does not work.
>There is probably a lot of Jews in Morroco and other Arab countries
>who are willing to immigrate too. However, with the status quo in the
>Middle East, I think the Arab countries will not allow them to do so
>for two reasons:          

They can leave Morroco if they want.

>1> The Palestinians who are living in refugee camps are not allowed
>   to go back to their land.

>2> The returning Jews from the arab countries will be settled in the
  West Bank and Gazza strip.

>Nabil

This has been discussed before.  Syria is one of the few countries
that won't let its Jews leave. (The Soviet Union and Ehtiopia now do)
They are holding them hostage so they can trade them for the Golan.  
Argument #2 just doesn't work. The Jews who have left Syria have gone 
to New York, and many want to go there.  Syria just won't let them
go anywhere.    

The Palestininans and the Jews of Syria are separate issue.  
Making them the same issue essentially makes the Syrian Jews hostages
to the government of Syria.  This is morally indefensible, and the
reasons that pro-Syrian people have given for this are just nonsense.
The Syrian Jews are not Israelis, they are not soldiers, and they
are not prisioners of war.

The right to leave a country is guaranteed by the UN declaration of 
human rights, and other international treaties and organizations.

Syria's policy is simply indefensible.


Leon Gross
I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV.
From: allen@golem.ssc.gov (Mike Allen)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Equality (again)
Date: 8 Apr 92 19:58:32 GMT
	<1992Apr8.173708.13094@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
Reply-To: Michael_Allen@ssc.gov
Organization: SSC Laboratory, Dallas, TX

>>>>> On 8 Apr 92 17:37:08 GMT, jgoldber@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Joel Goldberg) said:

In article <1992Apr8.173708.13094@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> jgoldber@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Joel Goldberg) writes:

Joel> In article <10128@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> isaac@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Isaac Balbin) writes:
>MASH@weizmann.weizmann.ac.il (Michael Shimshoni) writes:
>
>>                                  I claim that there  is inequality in
>>Halakha and give an  example.  
>
>Sorry, this is where you go wrong. You can't claim there is inequality in
>Halacha if you come from a halachik stand point unless you define
>equality and inequality from the *halachik* stand point. 

Joel>     In practice, this isn't so clear cut. Poskim often work very
Joel>     hard to show that Halacha, in fact, sanctions some process which
Joel>     the poskim (and the entire community) consider desirable. What
[...]
Joel>     is not in fact that way, because the result doesn't sit well
Joel>     with the poskim's internal sense of what's just.


As is often the case in Halachah, the situation ain't that simple.  I
highly recommend the article entitled "Is There Ethics Outside
Halachah?", in Encounters, a publication of the AOJS.  I will find a
more detailed reference for anyone interested.

The conclusion of the article is that it depends on what you mean by
both ethics and halachah.  As usual the final answer to the question
is "yes and no".
--
===============================================================================
	German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, on the inauguration of Germany's first
Holocaust memorial, saying Germans must never forget Nazi atrocities:
	``(We) owe it to our children and grandchildren. We must pass on to
them the realization that it is not at all self-evident that one should
be allowed to live in peace and freedom.''
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: ness@aecom.yu.edu (Seth Ness)
Subject: jewish superheroes
Reply-To: <ness@aecom.yu.edu>
Organization: Nysernet
Date: 9 Apr 92 04:00:28 GMT

heres another jewish superhero, moon knight-marc spector
his dad was a rabbi.
seth
ness@aecom.yu.edu

-- 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: MASH@weizmann.weizmann.ac.il (Michael Shimshoni)
Subject: On an Early Sanhedrin (again)
Organization: Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 92 12:40:07 +0300

 In: <80920405203108/0004839378NA3EM@mcimail.com>
 0004839378@mcimail.com (Joshua Proschan) asks also me:

>In a series of postings, Michael Shimshoni and Sean Philip Engelson
>having been discussing whether the following assertions are "Purim
>Torah":

I speak only for myself, and Sean  (Shlomo), if he feels like it, will
speak for himself.

>    1.   The Sanhedrin continued to exist after the exile, and during
>         the period described in Megillas Esther.
>
>    2.   Mordechai was a member of the Sanhedrin.
>
>Both agree that the Sanhedrin was not functioning during the exile.  I
>do not see why, and disagree with this.  It is not simply that the
>Talmud and Midrash assert that the Sanhedrin continued to exist; plain
>logic dictates that it would.
>
>The Sanhedrin was the highest rabbinical court.  It began during the 40
>years in the Sinai desert; and continued in existence after the
>destruction of the Second Temple.  It is well documented that the
>Sanhedrin moved to Yavneh, and continued to function as a Sanhedrin.

I personally  do not  believe that a  Sanhedrin-like body  (clearly by
another name) existed prior to the return from Exile.  Besides the one
mention of the 70 in the Torah,  the COMPLETE lack of any reference to
it in the Tanakh brings me to that conclusion.  The ONLY part which is
"well documented" is the moving of  the religious center to Yavneh and
the  functioning of  a  body  of authority  in  Yavneh  headed by  the
Nesi'im.

As to M. being a member of  the "Sanhedrin", I doubt it (even if there
had been  one before and  during that Exile),  also because it  is not
mentioned.  This  would seem to  me to  merit some mention,  even more
than other parts of his biography like he name of his grand father and
that of Qish.

>To say that the Sanhedrin also continued to function during the earlier
>exile seems perfectly reasonable.  In fact, it seems essential; during
>such a terrible period, the people would do everything they could to
>keep community institutions functioning, so as to preserve the
>community.  The Sanhedrin is clearly one of the most important
>institutions they could have taken with them, to provide guidance and
>continuity.

Besides the  fact that  the Sanhedrin  is not  mentioned in  Esther, I
cannot imagine that with the  complete destruction of the Jewish power
structure by the the Babylonians, they could have succeeded in keeping
the S. alive.  That is how my logic works.

One  should also  remember that  in none of  the books  of the  Tanakh
describing  the  exile, there  is a  mention at  all of  anything that
could even resemble the Sanhedrin.

>I hope that Shimshoni does not mean his last sentence literally, and
>that he and Engelson will explain why they find all this so
>unreasonable.

Quite literally.   Here and on other occasions I tried to explain.

>Joshua H. Proschan   Internet: 0004839378@mcimail.com

 Michael Shimshoni
From: ehrlich@bimacs.BITNET (Gideon Ehrlich)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Vegetarian Hagadah?
Date: 10 Apr 92 07:54:31 GMT
Organization: Math department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, ISRAEL

In article <9204082135.AA00706@relay2.UU.NET>
br042@cleveland.freenet.edu writes:

>In article <3818@bimacs.BITNET> ehrlich@bimacs.BITNET (Gideon
>Ehrlich) writes:

>
>> By the way , in some Hagadot there is a mistake.
   ^^^^^^^^^^
>>on KORECH ( the Sandwich ) one should say :
>>
>>So deed Hillel, he put together PESACH maza and maror and eat them
>>together.
>>the word PESACH - the lamb , do not appear becaue of a mistake in
>>thos Hagadot.
>
>Why be so quick to do away with a Nussach,
> which is  Minahg Yisreol for many Doros with a simple wave of hand?
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>See Rambam Perek 8 Chometz Umatzah 6-8.  He says that even in the time of
>the Bais Hamikdash they only put together Matzah and Marror AND ATE THAT
>with the Korbon Pesach.  The poskim bring that Rambam to justify our
>custom .......................

And why be so quick to do a way with the Verses " veahavta lereacha
kamocha", "veasita hayashar vehatov".
One may say that those verses are not  Minahg Yisreol for many Doros"
-)  but they are still verses.

I saw the nosach "pesach maza umaror" in some old Hagada, and I
remember none in which the Nosach is just "maza umaror" , now I'll
check again, if it is actually an old nosach.

Trying to keep the original nosach from printing ( and other
) mistakes is a way of HONORING "minhag Yisrael", think about that.

Shalom     Gideon    EREZ YISRAEL


Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: gross@befvax.uchicago.edu
Subject: Re: recognition
Reply-To: gross@befvax.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago, Dept of Molecular Genetics
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 18:01:07 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.183702.20425@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM>, nabil@ncrcol.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM (Nabil Idriss) writes:
>> This is false. Arafat has said that when there was a two-state solution,
>> Israel would be recognized.
>
>So what is wrong with that? Egypt recognized Israel in return, Israel returned
>the Sinai desert to Egypt. The Palestinians wants to have their own sovereignty,
>they do not want anybody ruling them.

I was saying that the claim Arafat ALREADY had recognized Israel was
false. 
I was not saying anything about whether the two state solution was 
right or wrong.

>> Sitting at the Peace table does not constitute recognition.
>
>O.K. but the good will is there just by sitting at the peace table. 
It shows a measure of good will on both parts.  But other actions 
elsewhere show bad will.

>Nabil

Leon Gross
I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: shimoff@umbc4.umbc.edu (Eliot Shimoff)
Subject: Re: Jewish - Israeli names
Organization: University of Maryland Baltimore Campus, Academic Computing Services
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 18:28:05 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.145517.25169@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> jgoldber@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Joel Goldberg) writes:
>In article <167C514E5B.HSUSA00@ricevm1.rice.edu> HSUSA00@ricevm1.rice.edu (Susarla, H. Krishna) writes:
>>I'm writing a story which has, as one of its characters, a female Israeli-Jew.
>>
>>I was wondering if anyone can provide me with some suggested first and last
>>names. Of course, such a list might be endless, but I would like to hear as
>>many suggestions as possible.
>>
>>Reply in private if possible.
>  Ah c'mon, this is one of my fondest memories of Israel:
>
>  Midsummer. Darkness settles over Givat Chen in suburban Ness Ziona,
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^             ^^^^^^^^^^
Now _there_ are two neat names for a leading character!

>  and the temperature falls from stultifying to merely hot. On the
>  street, a fourteen year old Sabra'it, disdaining modern technology,
>  assembles her friends for a trip to the glidaria. Facing the apartment
>  blocks she calls, "Orrrreeeeet, Efraaaaaat, Irrrrreeeeeet,
>  Osnaaaaaat."

What about "tzeeeeeeeeepeeeeeeeeeee?"  (Several years ago, I had a
yoredet student named Fanny.  I asked why she used that name (but I
didn't suggest there was anything wrong with it). She told me that
she couldn't stand the name Tzippy, and preferred Fanny.  Al ta'am
v'al re'ach ain l'hit'vakeach.)


-- 
Eliot Shimoff                  |    n   n   n
   shimoff@umbc3.umbc.edu      |   X + Y = Z .  Easy to prove no solutions
Ashamnu, bagadnu, gazalnu ...  |   for n greater than 2.  Darn.  Can't fit
Better luck next year!         |   it into this little .sig file.  Oh well.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: root@kesher.UUCP (Aaron_Schmiedel)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: DOS Hebrew Keyboard/Video Drivers
Keywords: KESHERworks  HEBREW FONTS DOS
Date: 9 Apr 92 04:11:22 GMT
Organization: KESHERnet International - Dallas, Tx


                           ANNOUNCING!

The latest release of the SHAREWARE product "HEBREW DRIVERS"!

                 V E R S I O N   2 . 0 0


This one fixes some cosmetic problems, but I bumped it up a version because it
also adds SIX (count 'em!) VGA fonts!

RASHI and RASHI BOLD  -  The "Rashi" font on screen!
SCRIPT and SCRIPT BOLD - Yep.  Read in SCRIPT now!
BLOCK and BLOCK BOLD   - Easiest to read.  Very nice!

Download your copy from your favorite BBS and DON'T FORGET TO REGISTER!  These
things take a lot of time to create!!!!!

Look for:  HEBDRV20.ZIP  (30628 bytes)   BBS: (214) 239-7607

And being sent to my usual feeds as a uuencoded file:

-- 
| Aaron D. Schmiedel                     |                                    |
| KESHERnet International                |  When a nebbekh leaves the room    |
| ..uunet!convex!egsner!sdf!kesher!aaron |    It's as if someone else came in!| 
| Voice: (214) 239-1941  Data: 239-7607  |                                    |
From: rnewman@bbn.com (Ron Newman)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Learn the law, Mark! Re: NOT ALL SPEECH IS PROTECTED!
Date: 13 Apr 1992 21:23:26 GMT
Organization: Bolt, Beranek & Newman, Inc.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: spcsun25.bbn.com

In article <1992Apr13.202609.1057@midway.uchicago.edu>, rivk@quads.uchicago.edu (nora gayle rivkis) writes:

|> >If the Klan decides to
|> >burn a cross in a location with a high African American population, a
|> >reasonable person might perceive this as a threat.  A deliberate threat
|> >can be considered assault.  
|> 
|> No; a deliberate threat that gives someone concrete reason to believe
|> it's about to be carried out can be considered assault. If it's only
|> spoken, you can consider it whatever you want until you are blue in
|> the face, and the court will still laugh you out of the room.

There are better ways to deal with this case anyway.  Arresting Klan
members for "burning wood outdoors without a permit" would be a good
way to make them feel stupid without violating their constitutional
rights...

-- 
Ron Newman		rnewman@bbn.com
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: nadel@aero.org (M.H. Nadel)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Questions About Uncleanliness
Keywords: unclean menstruation
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:26:21 GMT
Organization: The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA


The translation to "unclean" is a poor one.  If one must use a translation,
"ritually impure" would be more precise.

I suggest that Rachel Adler's essay (in one of the volumes of The Jewish
Catalog) is well worth reading, as it is generally accepted by observant
women as stating their position well.  Essentially, the argument is related
to the state of ritual impurity incurred by contact with death and
menstruation as a sign of the loss of potential life.  


Miriam Nadel
-- 
"UCLA's fans are so totally mellow, nine out of every 10 have no idea where in
the world Duke University is located, or whether it was endowed by John Wayne
or named after Patty."     - Mike Downey
nadel@aerospace.aero.org
From: warren@nysernet.org (Warren Burstein)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: Vegetarianism & Halacha (was Re: Following Sedar tradition)
Date: 10 Apr 92 12:24:52 GMT
Reply-To: warren@nysernet.org
Organization: Mail to News Gateway

DG = gertler@ptms_dev.sbi.com (Don Gertler)

me: Beliefs, even if they contradict the Torah, are not AZ unless they
me: involve other gods.  Of course beliefs that contradict the Torah are
me: to be avoided, but we still should keep our averot straight.

DG: How does this apply to the discussion of homosexuality in halacha? :-)

Easy.  Here we have an example of something that is an averah.  There
are even people who make an -ism out of it, which makes it not just an
averah but also causes others to do likewise.  But it's not AZ unless
one of the participants is a Canaanite "kadesh".
-- 
/|/-\/-\          The entire kitchen is		Jerusalem
 |__/__/_/        still full of strange hamantaschen
 |warren@         And the custodian
/ nysernet.org    is starting to get worried.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: horen@rs.com (Jonathan B. Horen)
Subject: Re: Partial Passover Product List
Organization: Renaissance Software, Inc.
Distribution: ba
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 21:42:46 PDT

I would also like to add that while shopping at my neighborhood Safeway (in
Sunnyvale -- corner of Homestead and Hollenbeck) on Sunday for Pesach
products, I saw some candies from Elite (Ramat-Gan, Israel). It's true, I
don't really need to eat candy, but what the heck. When I checked the wrappers
(we're talking about fruit-filled chocolate bars and chocolate-covered
cocoanut mini-bars) I found *no* "Kosher le-Pesach" markings (unlike on other
products).

The corn-syrup/corn-starch controversy is another matter, being specifically
between Ashkenazi/Sephardi minhagim -- but the absence of "Kosher le-Pesach"
markings is pretty bad.

Let's look carefully, and point out these problems to our local supermarket
staffs -- they really do care, and it is *our* responsability.

Khag Kasher v-Sameakh!

      Jonathan B. Horen | Tel: (415) 856-8000 | That things may turn out better
    TechWriter/SysAdmin | FAX: (415) 941-8943 | than expected is as much a 
   Renaissance Software | email: horen@rs.com | risk factor as that they
175 S. San Antonio Road | Los Altos, CA 94022 | may turn out worse.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
From: shr@cs.brown.edu (Seth H. Rosenzweig)
Subject: Re: Frightening post on sci.research
Keywords: Sounds familiar
Reply-To: shr@cs.brown.edu (Seth H. Rosenzweig)
Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 18:31:20 GMT

In article <44573@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> kisa@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
(Kisa) writes:

[referring to Ralph Winston's anti-Semitic propaganda on sci.research
(and soc.history, and talk.politics, and alt.conspiracy, and
alt.censorship, and alt.discrimination, and alt.activism, and ...)]

>
>When I was living back in USSR, we used to get a lot of *information* of
>this kind. Now the only thing different is the language. Even style is the 
>same. Feels like *home*.
>

There are at least two major differences:

1)  Winston's *information* is not government sponsored.

2)  Winston and his propaganda are almost universally condemned.


Interestingly, though, Ralph's revelation does bear more than just a
passing resemblance to that anti-Semitic Czarist masterpiece, "The
protocols of the meetings of the learned elders of Zion."  But I am
sure that this is just a coincidence, since a smart guy like Ralph
Winston, who isn't fooled by "the lie that is the Holocaust," as he
calls it, would surely not be suckered in by such a notorious forgery
as the Protocols.
__________________
Seth H. Rosenzweig			shr@cs.brown.edu
P.O. Box 1910, Brown University		shr@browncs.bitnet
Providence, RI 02912			uunet!brunix!shr