From: lape@cs.utk.edu (Bryon S. Lape)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:29:51 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - CS Department
NNTP-Posting-Host: duncan.cs.utk.edu

In article <9210081734.AA21296@MIT.EDU> bowler@athena.mit.edu (Bert Smith) writes:
>
>                GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
>
> *    Bush's latest attack on Bill Clinton for a trip he took 23 years
> ago is a pathetic attempt to divert the American people from the
> worst economic record in 50 years.  It is a sign of pure
> desperation.

	Wrong.  CLinton's response is "pure desperation."

>
> *    Bush said last night it's been an ugly political year.  He's
> right -- and he's responsible for it.  It's smear campaigns like he's
> running that have turned off the American people.

	Clinton was the first with a negative add.

>
> *    The American people don't want to hear about Bill Clinton's 1969
> itinerary, they want to hear about the course America is going to
> take.  Bill Clinton has a plan to create millions of new jobs,
> provide every American with affordable health care, and improve our
> schools.  George Bush can only offer more of the same.

	I am an American, and I want to know about his past.  Quit thinking
and speaking for me.  Clinton's plan will raise taxes on everyone and
create a social/welfare state.  No thanks.  Besides, according to the SSA,
anyone who goes to college and gets a degree, then works for the same
company for 40 years has a 98% chance of being dead or broke by the age of
65.  95% of the 2% who make it own their own business.  So, where is the
value in a job?

>
> *    Because the Republicans have such a miserable economic record,
> they've resorted to lobbing hand grenade after hand grenade, hoping

	Wrong again.  The tax increase of 1990 is responsible for the
economy going sore.  THis was a democratic law.

>
> *    Consider the source: these scurrilous charges were started by
> Bob Dornan ranting on the House floor, who admits he has no evidence
> and was "speculating."  They were picked up by the Washington Times,
> and fanned by Bush deputy campaign director Mary Matalin and press
> secretary Torie Clarke.  And we all know who gives them directions:
> James Baker, the former Secretary of State.

	And Clinton has yet to come clean on anything.

>
> *    One sign of Bush's desperation is his moving to a direct attack
> on Clinton's opposition to the Vietnam war.  Recall Bush's 1989
> Inaugural Speech when he pledged to the American people to end
> divisions over the war:

	This is basis for his foreign policy (lack thereof).
>
> *    There's a name for Bush's attack -- red-baiting.  Bush might
> have been a good candidate during the Cold War, he's not a candidate
> for the future.  With this latest slur, he sounds like Joe McCarthy.
> Next thing he'll be calling for the revival for the House UnAmerican
> Activities Committee and blacklisting.

	Wrong again.  Boy, where do you live??

>
> who was attending Oslo University.  He met Father McSorley
> coincidentally at the Oslo train station, they traveled to the

	Not according to Father McSorley.

>


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   The American education system only teaches you to go into debt,
		fortunately, I know how to get out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 21:02:42 GMT
Subject: Why isn't Rush libertarian?
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA