HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org (Huett Bishop)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles vs. 49ers:  what'll happen
Date: 10 Nov 92 23:22:46 GMT
Organization: Tandem Telecommunications Systems Inc.

In article <1992Nov10.043028.24229@wheaton.wheaton.edu> klbartle@david.wheaton.edu (Kevin Bartlett) writes:
>
>    I will be as bold as to say that the success of the 49ers offense is due
>to the play of the offensive line.  The Eagles' D is certainly good enough to
>neutralize any offensive line. 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yeah. Like when they played the Cowboys last week, eh?

If this happens, the game will come down to
>Cunningham and the Eagles' offense.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ditto above comment

Young could easily be stopped, both in
>his scrambling and passing, and the running games slowed, all by controlling
>the line.                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                                 Like Emmitt Smith Huh?



+--------------------------------------+
|Huett Bishop                          |
| Tandem Telecommuncations Systems Inc.|
|Dallas, TX                            |
|                                      |
|Go Cowboys!!                          |
|                                      |
|email: hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org      |
+--------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sbs9276@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Reply-To: sbs9276@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 21:41:04 GMT

Not only was the Juice the first to do it-- he did it in a 14 game season
	The Dick is just that-- always has been.
From: rinehart@aramis.rutgers.edu (Mark J. Rinehart)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Packers 7 - Giants 27 (Packer fan perspective)
Date: 9 Nov 92 20:43:35 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <1992Nov9.162826.17540@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:

> Notes:
> Johnny Holland and Bart Oates were tossed out of the game right at the 
> end for fighting.  Probably Holland's fault.  The Giants had the ball 
> at the Packer 7 with 43 secs left and were kneeling to run out the clock.
> I didn't see it but Holland probably tried to pound his way in  
> to force a fumble.  This failed of course and on the next play the 
> Giants ran off tackle for a TD, a fight ensued and Holland and Oates 
> were ejected.

This was the reason why Hoss and the Giants *ran* another play into
the endzone for a td with the game already decided. I don't blame Hos
for being pissed at the Packers. 






mark
Organization: Freshman, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 03:17:36 -0500 
From: Young-Soo Che <yc25+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Fins vs colts
	<1992Nov9.181515.17078@cs.ucf.edu>

Although the monday nite game is supposedly the  Big Big Big one, the
confrontation to settle the AFC champion, the Dolphins still have to
face the 49ers, and the Saints mind you, so even if the Fish win, it's
still not over.  To all you Dolphin fans like me, Don't count your
chickens before they shit, well you know how the saying goes.  We should
know better than that.  We've been thru this crap before, but i guesss
that's why i like them, the suspense that they might lose a game to the
worst teams, but can still beat the best.
GO FISH GO
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: wisp@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Wisp)
Subject: Re: Teams with anemic offence and Super Defence
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 09:03:29 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.134505.17485@bmw.mayo.edu> bergerson@mayo.edu writes:
>
>first of all, to the dipshit that started this posting:
>
>LEARN HOW TO SPELL :   OFFENSE          OFFENCE (NOT!!!)
>                       DEFENSE          DEFENCE (NOT!!!)
>

More masturbatory spelling flames. Chad, darling, in the UK we spell it
'offence', in the USA you spell it 'offense'. End of story.

The Wisp. [we don't spell potato with an 'e', either...]
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: MCMASTER@LSTC2VM.stortek.com (Jim McMaster)
Subject: Re: Elway given reigns in Broncos victory over the Jets
Organization: StorageTek SW Engineering
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 18:54:53 GMT

In article <1992Nov09.201030.18576@watson.ibm.com>
rlehman@watson.ibm.com (Robert C. Lehman) writes:
 
>In article <1992Nov9.180434.3959@vexcel.com> tom@vexcel.com (Tom Baltzer) writes:
>>The Jets did a strange (and costly), substitution of O`brian for Nagle
>>with about 2 minutes left in the half.  First pass is picked off by
>>Wyman Henderson, and he takes it in for the score!
>
>It was hardly Ken O'Brien's fault that Freeman McNeil decided to turn
>the pass into a jump ball... :-)
>
>However, putting O'Brien in was rather strange -- if Nagle is playing
>to learn the position, then leave him in, regardless of how much of
>the offense he knows or how well he runs the two minute drill.  Better
>to learn now when they are 2-7...
>
>-Rob
 
Strange, nothing...it was stupid.  O'Brien arguably won the right to
start the week before, but Coslett chose to stick with Nagle.  Then
brought O'Brien in to run the two-minute drill????  This kind of stunt
will ruin Nagle's confidence, and isn't great for O'Brien either.
 
As for the pass....it was catchable, but high.  If McNeil had caught
it, it would have been a good catch.  The locals here are still
laughing at how stupid Coslett was in thet game.
 
Jim McMaster
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: 49ers/Cardinals
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 01:57:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.075417.3970@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:

><1992Nov6.013036.29430@netcom.com> mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:

>>>Correct me if I'm wrong, but Dallas is the only team with a winning record
>>>that hasn't lost to a team with a losing record.

>>2. What would you infer from this?  That the Bowboys are so disciplined
>>that they don't let up, or something?  At first glance, it seems like
>>a "so what" stat...

>Yeah, so are much of the stats presented here.  I think it points to
>consistency.  Ideally most people think of great teams losing to great
>[...]
>But I tend to agree, at the halfway point it's not much of a stat.  Unless
>of course, *your* team had in it's favor. :-)

I'm not sure it's really *in* Dallas' favor.  What I get from that stat
is that the team is really effective at beating the mediocre teams, which
is certainly "to the good."  But mediocre teams are going to be a bit
tougher to find in the playoffs, and unless the team has an impressive
record against playoff-caliber teams as well, there's cause for concern.
-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: GIANTS news
Date: 12 Nov 92 22:44:16 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Nov12.042627.17369@husc3.harvard.edu> demoreno@husc8.harvard.edu (Dairo Moreno) writes:
>It is definately the end of an era.  This is no way for one of the best
>who ever played the game to leave it.  This is truly a sad day in NFL
>history.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------
>Forever a NEW YORK GIANTS fan.
>     Dairo Moreno
>-------------------------------------------------
>
>Long Live L.T.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He'll be back!!!!

1993: Lawrence Taylor returns to the New York GIANTS ... as DEFENSIVE 
	COORDINATOR.  With one of the leqgues strongest pass rushes, the
	GIANTS, behind the guidelines of returning head coach Bill Parcells
	clinch the NFC East title ...

Well, I was bored ...

satish nair
go giants
From: freshlt@quig14.alleg.edu (Timothy Freshly)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Steelers' WRs (was Re: STEELERS:  Eric Green suspended)
Date: 11 Nov 92 20:52:56 GMT
Organization: Allegheny College

In article <1992Nov11.175025.12640@infonode.ingr.com>  
dpm@liberty.b29.ingr.com (David Mikesell) writes:
> In article <10NOV92.21570250@vax.clarku.edu>, htilney@vax.clarku.edu  
writes:
[stuff deleted]
> >this. If anything else happens maybe they should consider trading him  
for
> >a decent WR or lineman. 
>    ^^^^^^^^^
> 
> 	Actually, I think the Steelers have very good WRs, albeit young  
ones,
> but they don't throw to them that much.  Jeff Graham has drawn some  
double 
> coverage due to his early success, but Ernie Mills has performed very  
well in
> the last two weeks.  I don't think Dwight "hands of" Stone will get his  
job
> back.  Also, the new guy Davenport (#80) made some tough catches in the  
Bills
> game.  
> 	I think the Steelers offense could be much more explosive with  
these
> guys, and it will in time as O'Donnell and the offense matures.  In  
fact,
> with Eric Green on the sidelines now, look for them to start going to  
these
> guys more often.
> 
> >
> >Bart
> 
> dpm


	Another thing to consider is that, even with Green on the  
sidelines, the Steelers still have a very good tight end in Cooper who has  
proven to be almost, if not as, effective as Green both catching the ball  
and blocking.  The Steelers have lost a big player but I think they can  
cover pretty well with Cooper and the WR's.

			Tim

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
=      ___________    =  I [may] not agree with a word you say, =
=     /___   ____/\   =  but I will defend to the death your    =
=     \__/  /\___\/   =  right to say it.                       =
=       /  / /        =                      - Voltaire         =
=      /  / / ___     = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
=     /__/ / /__/\    = Tim Freshly  Box 990  Allegheny College =
=     \__\/  \__\/    =  (freshlt)    Meadville, Pa. 16335      =
=                     =    Net -->  <freshlt@alleg.edu>         =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cooperr@a.cs.okstate.edu (COOPER ROBERT BRYA)
Subject: 4,000 yard passers OR a tale of two Danss.
Organization: Oklahoma State University, Computer Science, Stillwater
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 07:10:58 GMT

Since the posting of the top ten single-season rushers was quickly
used to prove what a quality qb Dan Marino is, I thought it only
proper to post the stats for single-season passing leaders. 
Maybe it will generate a discussion of what a good receiver
Charley Hennigan was.



                   SINGLE-SEASON PASSING LEADERS

         Player        Team      year  att.  comp.  pct.  yards
      ------------- ----------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------
 1    Dan Marino    Miami        1984   564   362   64.2%  5084
 2    Dan Fouts     San Diego    1981   609   360   59.1%  4802
 3    Dan Marino    Miami        1986   623   378   60.7%  4746
 4    Dan Fouts     San Diego    1980   589   348   59.1%  4715
 5    Warren Moon   Houston      1990   584   362   62.0%  4689
 6    Neil Lomax    St. Louis    1984   560   345   61.6%  4614
 7    Lynn Dickey   Green Bay    1983   484   289   59.7%  4458
 8    Dan Marino    Miami        1988   606   354   58.4%  4434
 9    Bill Kenney   Kansas City  1983   603   346   57.4%  4348
10    Don Majkowski Green Bay    1989   599   354   59.1%  4318

==================================================================
As I mentioned in the post about single-season rushers, I have
lost my USA Today with last season's stats, so forgive me if
any qb's cracked this list and are not represented.

If you find any errors in this listing or wish to comment on the 
content, please notify me at:

cooperr@a.cs.okstate.edu

Bryan Cooper
ps. peace

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: Top 12 in total yards from scrimmage
Organization: University of Michigan
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 15:36:16 GMT

In article <meskes.721576861@ulysses> meskes@ulysses.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Michael Meskes) writes:

   Only two teams have two players on this list:
   1) As nearly everyone expected: Cowboys
   2) Who thought of this: Packers

   Any comments?


I love to watch Sterling play, and he kills my team (well, at least once
recently).  Workman should give half his salary to Holmgren for comming to
TB, putting Favre into the qb slot, and giving him a chance.  I guess the
other half should go to DT for getting injured.  What do the Pack fans think
of Vince?  I've got the impression that a lot of backs could do what he has
done in the same situation, but I haven't seen him play much.  In any case,
they sure are getting a lot of quiet production from the guy.

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Re: JGH computer rankings
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date: 12 NOV 92 10:03:08    

In article <1dt7f5INNno8@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>, trottibw@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu(Barry Trottier) writes...

>In article <1992Nov11.164053.15434@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN  
>HEIM	) writes:
>> Week 11: No change in top 7.  (Steeler fans are not going to be 
>> happy.)
>>                             Last
>> Rank   Team         Rating  Week
>>  1     Cowboys        90     1
>>  2     Eagles         84     2
>>  3     Saints         82     3
>>  4     Vikings        80     4
>>  5     49ers          79     5
> 
>[From another article by same poster.]
>>Saints     at   49ers         3
> 
> 
>Interesting, your system rates the Saints higher, but pickes San Francisco to  
>win?

Home field advantage.

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ables@hal.com (King Ables)
Subject: Re: 49ers whip Dallas in NFC Championship.
Organization: HaL Computer Systems, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 16:35:00 GMT

From article <1dv6phINNr8@male.EBay.Sun.COM>, by 49ers@eb5ts4.EBay.Sun.COM (Renie Maycon):
> The 49ers will ship Dallas in the NFC Championship game. because dallas is a 
> young team that will fold under pressure. Any Comments?

Comments?  Yeah, I got comments.  I think you're full of sh*t!  ;-)

But seriously... I haven't seen much that tells me the 49ers
are for real (I know, I know, nobody thinks the Cowboys are, either).
Maybe it's just the way the pix-bytes we get here look, but I'm 
just not that impressed, sorry.  I think the NFC Championship game
will be two of Cowboys/Redskins/Eagles because even though the
Skins and Eagles have tripped a little, I think they're strong
teams and will have it back together by playoff time (but I'd sure
*love* to be wrong about that!  I'd like to see the Vikings get
there, but I just don't think so.

I'd love to see the Cowboys play the 49ers because I'd like to
get 'em back for last time!  If it is the Cowboys and 49ers, I
don't think that young will enter into it.  The Cowboys are young
but not inexperienced.
---------------------------------------------------------------
King Ables                    HAL Computer Systems, Inc.
ables@hal.com                 8920 Business Park Dr., Suite 300
+1 512 794 2855               Austin, TX  78759
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug."
				-- Dire Straits & Mary-Chapin Carpenter
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: vineet@belar.ECE.ORST.EDU (Vineet Dalal)
Subject: Re: Deion, Deion, Deion
Organization: none
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 05:04:32 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.200005.21562@ccd.harris.com> bdb@controls.ccd.harris.com (Bill D. Buckalew) writes:
>
>Does anyone know if Deion is expected to play tonight?  Look for 
>J. Rice to have less than 3 receptions and under 25 yards if Prime
>Time plays, and the Falcons to stomp the 'niners at home 
>in the dome.

        NOT !!

 Looks like Mr Prime Time fizzled out today.  As for the Falcons
performance, the less said the better!

 GO NINERS!


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Vineet R. Dalal                     | "You know the day destroys the night,
 Electrical & Computer Engg.         |  Night divides the day,
 Oregon State University             |  Try to run, try to hide,
 Corvallis, OR 97330                 |  Break on through to the other side! " 
 			             |		
 email: vineet@ece.orst.edu          |	        	 --The Doors
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 49ers/Cardinals
Date: 5 Nov 1992 19:55:05 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

In article <1992Nov4.003701.4743@coopsol.com>, gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
>
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but Dallas is the only team with a winning record
>that hasn't lost to a team with a losing record.
>
>
>Gordon

New Orleans (6-2 with losses to SF and Philly)
comes to my mind.
Other than that  Houston in AFC Central
Bye,


       *********************************
       *	N.Ramasubramanian      *    	    
       * 	                       *    
       *	Dept. of Mech. Engg.   *    
       *	Marquette University   *    
       *********************************
From: kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: The Bills Are Back!!
Date: 9 Nov 92 04:52:56 GMT
Organization: UB

The title says it all. Sure, they were in a month long slump, but now that
is over. Just think, after Monday Night, there will be so few Miami fans on
the net.
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Date: 11 Nov 1992 21:06:10 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Howard Hughes Medical Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <49508@shamash.cdc.com> jblixt@neon.cdc.com (Jon Blixt) writes:
>Here are some trade items for the Vikings.
>
>Finally, the Vikings gave 7 count'em 7 draft choices.  THREEE #1 picks, THREE
>#2, and a third round choice.  Could someone tell me who these players
>turned out to be for Dallas.

Well, in actuality the Cowboys didn't use ANY of the ACTUAL picks
they got from Minnesota in the Walker deal.  Before you go reaching
for your 'F' key, let me explain.  They didn't make any of the 
selections in those spots, but instead used all of these picks to
move up and down in the respective drafts.  Guys like Emmitt Smith
and Russell Maryland were players selected with those picks.



Ray     GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Nick Lowery
Date: 6 Nov 1992 14:55:31 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Distribution: world,local
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

In article <6NOV199207592523@mcvax4.d48.lilly.com>, rx84335@mcvax4.d48.lilly.com (BENVENGA MARK J) writes:

>Is Eddie Murray still with the team?

Eddie Murray was waived .
May be he is in Dallas now.


       *********************************
       *	N.Ramasubramanian      *    	    
       * 	                       *    
       *	Dept. of Mech. Engg.   *    
       *	Marquette University   *    
       *********************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: 49ers/Cardinals
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 03:53:15 GMT

<1992Nov7.015700.2022@netcom.com> mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:
><1992Nov6.075417.3970@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
>><1992Nov6.013036.29430@netcom.com> mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) :
>>>>Correct me if I'm wrong, but Dallas is the only team with a winning record
>>>>that hasn't lost to a team with a losing record.
>
>>>2. What would you infer from this?  That the Bowboys are so disciplined
>>>that they don't let up, or something?  At first glance, it seems like
>>>a "so what" stat...
>
>>Yeah, so are much of the stats presented here.  I think it points to
>>consistency.  Ideally most people think of great teams losing to great
>>[...]
>>But I tend to agree, at the halfway point it's not much of a stat.  Unless
>>of course, *your* team had in it's favor. :-)
>
>I'm not sure it's really *in* Dallas' favor.  What I get from that stat
>is that the team is really effective at beating the mediocre teams, which
>is certainly "to the good."  But mediocre teams are going to be a bit
>tougher to find in the playoffs, and unless the team has an impressive
>record against playoff-caliber teams as well, there's cause for concern.

Luckily, that's not the case...  for the Cowboys, that is.


Gordon
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
From: cs92aja@cen.ex.ac.uk (A.J.Amsel)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Seattle Midseason (Wash. 16-3 over Seattle)
Date: 9 Nov 92 10:37:00 GMT
Organization: Computer Unit. - University of Exeter. UK

I have a shorter letter than that yet it covers the same topics : -
Offense - Shit
Defence - Shit
Everything - Shit

Hope that simplifies things.

Anyway, it was good to see someone bothering to tell us seattle fans what
is happening because they might as well not exist over here.

Could anyone possibly mail me a program if I give my normal address ?
I`d pay afterwards to cover postage + cost.
 
--




            
  
           AAA       LLL          EEEEEEEEE     XXX       XXX
         AA   AA     LLL          EEEEEEEEE      XXX     XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE             XXX   XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE              XXX XXX
        AAAAAAAAA    LLL          EEEEEEEEE         XXXXX
        AAAAAAAAA    LLL          EEE              XXX XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE             XXX   XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLLLLLLLL    EEEEEEEEE      XXX     XXX
       AAAA   AAAA   LLLLLLLLL    EEEEEEEEE     XXX       XXX

       - A.J.Amsel@exeter.ac.uk.cen

` And remember kids : - Incorrect use of a 
                        Fire extinguisher can 
                        seriously damage 
                        your Genitals        '

(C) Alex Amsel Designs Inc. 1992
` Beware the Ides of March - T'was the date of my birth.... '











-- 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro