HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: zell@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Joseph Zell)
Subject: Re: Cavs STOMP Bulls
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 21:34:26 GMT

glb50263@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Gary L. Blickhan) writes:

>This is in response to a previous article titled "Bulls STOMP Cavs" (I believe
>it was called.)   The Cavs got their revenge, and the Bulls were simply beat.

>You can say that they didn't have Jordan, and oh well, that's the cause.

>You are correct.  What happens to the Bulls if some guy like Laimbeer knocks
>Jordan out of the playoffs?  You could call it a cheap shot, but it would
>be a dose of reality for the Bulls.
 You COULD call it a cheap shot? To knock someone out of the play-offs, esp a
Piston doing it, WOULD DEFINITELY BE a cheap shot. Is that the same dose of
reality the Pistons got when they got swept, even over Isaiah's bragging
'We won't be swept' in last year's play-offs?
Joe

>Gary Blickhan

-- 
zell@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu  *   Holy Cow! Ryne Dawston hits another homerun!
RotcMan                *      -Harry Carry after a dozen too many Buds
Cubs in '93!!!!!!!!    *
From: halpin@sw.stratus.com (Jim Halpin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Official NBA Tie-breaker rules
Date: 14 Apr 92 14:59:23 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.


    Here's the official NBA tiebreaker scheme:

                TWO-TEAM TIE

    1) Results head-to-head.
    2) Winning percentage within conference.
    3) Winning percentage within division (only if both in same division).
    4) Winning percentage against playoff teams in own conference.
    5) Point differential in games between the two teams.

                MULTIPLE-TEAM TIE

    1) Winning percentage among all teams tied.
    2) Winning percentage within conference.
    3) Winning percentage within division (only if from same division).
    4) Winning percentage against playoff teams in own conference.
    5) Point differential between offense and defense.  (Huh?)


-- 
!	Jim  Halpin
!	halpin@turkey.sw.stratus.com
!	Matt Young is so pathetic, he can even screw up a no-hitter!!!
From: vbcs3650@Oswego.EDU (Brandon Leib)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Jordan
Date: 3 Apr 92 00:26:15 GMT
Reply-To: vbcs3650@oswego.Oswego.EDU (Brandon Leib)
Distribution: ny
Organization: Instructional Computing Center, SUNY at Oswego, Oswego, NY

In article <yury.08j4@bknight.jpr.com> yury@bknight.jpr.com (Yury German) writes:
>
>	Well Jordan did another showan move today when playing against the
>KNICKS. He decided the the fans were bothering him too much so he closed
>his eyes and shot freetrhrows with his eyes closed..... He was 2 for 2
>that way. Add another one to Air Jordan Showman moves.
>
>--
I think that Jordan is a real show off.
I mean he probably was betting on golf games and maybe on
basketball, but of course since he is the "big" NBA star, he cannot
be suspended or fined or it will be a let down to all of the kids
since their hero is a "loser".
Closing his eyes is a sign of a real ass.
I was hoping Ewing was going to smack him good.
What does everyone else think????











 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: bill@gaza.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (William J. King)
Subject: Re: Tark takes over Spurs
Organization: University of Hawaii
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 17:37:33 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.194551.27700@unlv.edu> suresh@charles.cs.unlv.edu (Suresh Kumar Vishnubhatla) writes:
>Just heard this.  Jerry Tarkanian has a new job.  He is going to take over
>the San Antonio Spurs from the next season. 

	Any work on the salary?
	Might the Tark take a pay cut? :-)
	BTW, Spurs have acquired a new fan, me!
	Wm



--
    bill@uhunix.bitnet 
    bill@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu 
    21.19 N.LAT by 157.52 W.LONG          
    Fish on the Byte
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: glb50263@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Gary L. Blickhan)
Subject: Re: Jordan playing Baseball?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 19:09:32 GMT

a


Mr Sour Grapes? This is an obvious attack of name calling.  At least I have
some respect for the names of other people on this network.  I suggest
alt.losers.name.calling for you.

Gary Blickhan
From: koswatta@bgsu.edu (Sunil Koswatta)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: point guards (who is best?)
Date: 13 Apr 92 19:48:33 GMT
Organization: Bowling Green State Univ.


In article <1992Apr13.095142.54410@cc.usu.edu> alanj@cc.usu.edu writes:
>Did anyone catch the segment NBC did on point guards before the Lakers-Jazz
>game on Saturday?  They did a loose comparison between John Stockton, Tim
>Hardaway, Isiah Thomas, Kevin Johnson, and Mark Price.  
>
>They asked each one who they thought was the best point guard in the league.
>Only Hardaway answered the question and he picked Stockton.
...
>Alan 

Well I was in Cleveland (Ohio) when I watch the same Lakers-Jazz game
on Saturday.  NBC showed a slightly different version here in Ohio. ;-)

In Ohio's version of that same game,
Stockton said Kevin Johnson is the best.
Kevin said Isiah is the best.
Isiah said Price is the best.
And finally Magic said Magic is the best.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu
Subject: Home court for Det - NY (No rematch, Boston!)
Organization: Wayne State University, C&IT
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 02:45:19 GMT

There goes a perfectly good 6-game winning streak. :(

Well, the Pistons have been doing favors for Boston by beating NY twice
last week. Now Atlanta has followed suit. I guess it's only fitting
that Boston beat Detroit tonite. Wouldn't it be weird if Boston loses their
next game and NY wins their's? Naw! Couldn't happen! ;-)

So it looks like Det will play NY in the first round, and I think Detroit has
the home-court advantage. >:->
Either way, it shouldn't matter the way NY is playing. ;-)

--Eric
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Another Bird man
Date: 14 Apr 92 08:27:05 GMT
Organization: Princeton University
Originator: news@ernie.Princeton.EDU

In article <13APR199217293991@rigel.tamu.edu> h0j1297@rigel.tamu.edu (BURT J.) writes:
>Heck yeah!
>
>The Celtics are going to Punish Person's Pacers!
>                         Trash Jordan's Cows
>                         Rip Daugherty's Cavs
>                    and  Destroy Hardaway's Warriors!
>
>Go Celtics!

Why are these Celtic fans so abnoxious. Trash Jordan's cows eh ....
Bullshit ! They are not even sure of being # 1 in the Atlantic Division
which is by far the worst in the NBA. And what is all this trash about
Larry being a GOD ? He might have been a great player 3-4 yrs. back but
he is hardly the reason why the Celts are making a strong run. Also it
is painful to go thru heaps of trash that these Celt fans add to the
pile. 


Go NEW YORK 							GO RILEY

                                  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: sasbrb@rolypoly.unx.sas.com (Brendan Bailey)
Subject: Re: Hottest team in the NBA
    <ddrumm.226h@amiganet.chi.il.us> <1992Apr15.190553.14945@ncsu.edu>
Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 14:14:45 GMT
Originator: sasbrb@rolypoly.unx.sas.com
X-Bytes: 818

In article <1992Apr15.190553.14945@ncsu.edu>, jsvastis@eos.ncsu.edu (JOHN SAM VASTIS) writes:
>
>       With the exception of Larry Johnson ( aka Larry LEGEND II )
>J.R. Reid is the second best power forward in the game.

   Don't you need a :-) at the end of this statement?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brendan Bailey                         "The NFL is on record saying that if 
SAS Institute, Inc - QA/Graph           it adds 150 expansion teams or hell 
sasbrb@unx.sas.com                      freezes over -- whichever comes      
Go Heels! Go Hornets!                   first -- Raleigh will be awarded a
The NFL in Charlotte! Target: 1994!!!   franchise." - The Charlotte Observer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: awesley@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Tony Wesley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: point guards (who is best?)
Date: 13 Apr 92 22:31:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: vela.14682
Organization: National Federation of Associations

I wanna know: who's the best point guard between Meeks and Lor?
-- 
 Tony Wesley					 awesley@vela.acs.oakland.edu

   The right most valued by all civilized men is the right to be left alone.
							-- Louis Brandeis
From: halpin@sw.stratus.com (Jim Halpin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: I just don't like the Bullsh__
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:06:47 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.

In article <ku8p8eINN6m4@utkcs2.cs.utk.edu>, schulman@hydra2b.cs.utk.edu (NEIL WAYNE SCHULMAN) writes:
> ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> All right!  another Bulls-hater!  I'm sick and tired of hearing about how high
> and mighty the bulls and jordan are!  Even though I live in the south east, 
> at least I can admire a basketball star who never had questions of gambling,
> infedelity, AIDS, depression, greediness, and that's Larry Bird, probably
> still one of the hardest workers in the NBA!


	Geez, try to crack a joke about the Bulls starters being 'rested', 
and next thing I know I'm labelled a "Bulls-hater"???? Far from it, I think
the Bulls are a great Bball team!

	Please don't try to associate me with your warped rantings about
Larry Bird. Even as a life-long Celtic fan, I can admit that Bird is way
beyond his prime and there are indeed better forwards in the league. Maybe
not many, but he's no longer the best. Its been that way for at least
4 seasons!

	And please get over this hero worship thing you have for Larry. He's
no saint. Quick, what's his most famous quote? "Moses does eat shit"! Hell
(oops..) Heck, even Magic Johnson doesn't swear in public! :-)

-- 
!	Jim  Halpin
!	halpin@turkey.sw.stratus.com
!	Vote for the 90's Elvis, he's still out there somewhere! :-)
From: rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Oliver Miller
Date: 16 Apr 92 23:25:57 GMT

Last year about this time I posted about Stanley Roberts being the most
unpredictable guy in the draft. I thought he was the most talented center
in the draft, but questions about his personality made him a hard call.

Well this year there is a very similar situation with Oliver Miller of
Arkansas. After his junior year, many rated him over Mourning from
Georgetown, but Oliver got much fatter(he was fat already), and had
a bad senior year, while Mourning thrived without Mutombo and would have
been the top guy in the draft if Shaq had stayed in school. How high will
Miller go now? If he's in decent shape, he's probably much better than
Victor Alexander, who's done a pretty good job for the Warriors(although
Nellie won't say that, Vic is his favorite foil). If he got complacent and
fat in college, what will he do when his salary jumps to a million from 
whatever it was at Arkansas? A fat Miller is a bust, an in shape Miller
could make a real impact, who will take the chance and when. Don't be
surprised if Nelson didn't gamble on him, he clearly wanted Roberts as
a player but not as a person, I think he regrets his decision, although
he wouldn't say so in public. 


Russ Smith
*******************************************************************************
"If this were at all legible, you would see what I'm talking about"

                            Chevy Chase in Fletch 
******************************************************************************
From: schulman@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (NEIL WAYNE SCHULMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Larry Bird *IS* GREAT!
Date: 13 Apr 92 17:00:26 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Dept, University of Tennesee, Knoxville
Distribution: world
Reply-To: schulman@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (NEIL WAYNE SCHULMAN)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra3f.cs.utk.edu

>Great another Bird watcher!  I'm sick of all this Bird bashing, too.  
I am sick of all this Bird ass-kissing, which intentionally brings
an unrelated third party (the Lakers) into the picture.

>Let the guy rest.  
OK, so just concentrate on the Bird, why mention the Lakers?

>After all, how many players can play 12 years and
>running and still get those stats?  After all, didn't Kareem get just
>, Oh my God!, 10.1 points per game in 1988!?!?!?  
Nope, sonny, it's 1989!

See, you make the same mistake as the other people do. Other people
shouldn't use a 28-year-old to bash your 35 year-old? 

No problem. Then why do you use a 35 year-old to bash a 42 year-old?

Let's see whether Larry can average 10.1 ppg in 1999 before you put
Kareem into the picture, OK?

Afterall, a 35 year-old Kareem was still the focus of the Lakers offense,
scoring ~23ppg, and led the team to the 1982 champsionhip.

>Why hasn't he been hacksawed?  
He has. Were you born in 1989? He even joked on it himself "They 
are waving me off. I am not part of the offense anymore."

>But I bet whichever team
>had the #1 pick in 1978 wishes they had bird!  (and probably L.A., to, 
>after all, who's still playing?  
Well, playing is not enough. Who has more rings?

>And who acts responsibly on *and* off the court?  And who is monogamous 
>with their wife???)
Oh, so monogamous with his wife is a prerequisite to play in the NBA?

What if he had no wife at that time? Boy, he didn't get marry until last
summer.  Are you going to bash all the people who choose to stay single at 
a certain age?

This is not soc.singles or alt.romance!

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
______________________

You made a few good points, but the last one intrigues me.  Since I am one who likes basketball and some morals, I am inclined to ask, do you have any?  No,

Neil
From: ec120wee@sdcc4.ucsd.edu (Anthony Minkoff)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: BOXSCORE sac77pho77.07apr92 (pho 103-101)
Date: 9 Apr 92 08:28:22 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

Well, here's the boxscore for the Phoenix-Sacramento game played on
07apr92.  I'm sure you've all been holding your breath waiting for
this one.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sac 101, pho 103   07apr92

Phoenix illegal defense
MISSING offensive rebounds

sac (25-52)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
simmons,lionel    41    7  19   0  0   5  8   -  8   7   2  1  2  2  0  0   19
tisdale,waymon    40    7  17   0  0   0  0   -  8   1   3  2  2  1  1  0   14
causwell,duane    28    2   4   0  0   0  0   -  5   1   3  0  0  5  0  0    4
ritchmond,mitch   47   14  20   2  3   2  2   -  3   4   3  1  3  1  0  0   32
webb,spud         36    4  10   3  4   2  3   -  1   7   1  0  2  0  0  0   13
bonner,anthony    35    5  12   0  0   1  2   - 15   2   4  3  4  1  0  0   11
hopson,dennis     13    2   6   0  0   4  4   -  2   0   0  2  2  0  0  0    8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sac totals       240   41  88   5  7  14 19   0 42  22  16  9 15 10  1  0  101
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .466   .714   .737       team rebs  7

pho (50-27)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
majerle,dan       44    7  17   1  2   0  0   -  2   5   0  3  2  1  0  0   15
perry,tim         34    1   7   0  0   2  4   -  7   6   1  2  2  0  0  0    4
lang,andrew       21    3   6   0  0   1  2   -  8   0   4  0  1  3  1  0    7
burtt,steve       28    9  14   0  0   2  2   -  2   6   2  1  2  0  0  0   20
hornacek,jeff     40    9  18   1  2   2  2   -  3  11   2  1  2  0  0  0   21
chambers,tom      28    7  20   0  1   8  9   -  5   3   2  0  2  1  0  0   22
west,mark         19    3   5   0  0   2  3   -  7   0   1  0  1  2  0  0    8
rambis,kurt       26    3   6   0  0   0  0   - 14   3   2  1  0  0  0  0    6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pho totals       240   42  93   2  5  17 22   0 48  34  14  8 12  7  1  0  103
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .452   .400   .773       team rebs 11
procedure technicals 1

sac   32  26  25  18  -  101
pho   30  24  27  22  -  103

attendance 14496, time 2:10, officials: JCrawford,BReichelt,JDeRosa
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: jerryo@pdx103 (Jerry Orleck)
Subject: Re: Sonics / Portland
Organization: Intel Corp., Hillsboro, Oregon
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 20:35:17 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.192343.6060@tc.fluke.COM> tron@tc.fluke.COM (Peter Barbee) writes:

>Ths Sonics lost to the 'Blazers Friday night in Portland.  Interesting
>game - it broke up the Sonics win streak (which they restarted with a
>blowout of the T'wolves on Sunday, yawn) but the Sonics played well.  The
>game was contested right down to the end.  I'm mostly writing this
>note to generate responses from some of the big Blazer fans (Orleck, et
>all).

>I thought Friday's game was poorly officiated.  Not so much because the
>Blazers won it at the line in the fourth but because it seemed really
>inconsistent - I didn't agree with what was called and I thought a lot
>of other things should have been called.  Maybe my living room isn't
>a very good perspective but still...

I'm afraid I can't give you a good perspective on this game.  Although I was
physically present my mind was elsewhere.  I have a vague recollection of a
good tough defense played by the Sonics, I remember looking for McKey (I
wasn't aware he was injured), and I didn't even notice that Benjamin was
missing - he almost always is even when he's on the floor.  The calls may
very well been inconsistent - we've seen taht all year but - I honestly was
out in the ozone somewhere and didn't notice.

>But I also think the Sonics need more respect if they're to get far in
>the playoffs.  And by respect I mean calls by refs.  Three in particular
>are: Buck sucks the ref in with bad acting and Shawn gets the offensive

Everybody tries to "suck the ref" (Boy, I can't imagine why you chose that
phrase :-).  That evens out.

>foul, Robinson falls out of bounds but gets the call despite minimum
>contact in going after a loose ball, and Pierce loses the ball out of
>bounds amid lots of contact and only gets a T for his troubles
>(admittedly he deserved the T for his delay of game but when Pierce
>complains there is a reason).  It's not that any of these calls changed 
>the game but they are indicative of respect Seattle isn't getting from
>the refs.  In the playoffs those calls could make the difference.

The game was played on Blazer turf - the home team usually gets a few more
calls.  N'est pas?

>than Utah.  But perhaps Big Ben will be back by then; remember the
>Sonics have put together this latest hot streak without his services.

There may be a correlation.

It's beginning to look like the Sonics and Golden State - a terrific match up.
Especially because one of them will lose :-).

-- 

Jerry Orleck                                  

jerryo@ichips.intel.com
From: wp01jst1@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (John Tomas)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: How good are the Bulls (RE: WARRIORS WOOFING)
Date: 7 Apr 92 02:12:35 GMT


Interesting: the Bulls are overrated because they got to play the best
team in the West and beat it convincingly.  During the series the
Lakers to a man said that the Bulls were much better than the team 
that they beat to get there.  Or is this some sort of joke?
From: navarrer@bionette.CGRB.ORST.EDU (Roy Navarre)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Laker Injuries
Date: 9 Apr 92 02:06:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: talon.1992Apr9.020600.25812
Organization: Biological Computing Consortium, OSU, Corvallis, OR.

> last thing the lakers need is another center.

Excuse me but i didnt know the lakers had a center.
:)

> shaq would give the lakers trade leverage

*smile* Yea, like if the lakers were lucky enough to get the shaq they7 would
trade him. No way! NOT NOT NOT!
Roy
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Physical Graffiti)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: BOXSCORE cha72chi73.01apr92
Date: 6 Apr 92 19:20:59 GMT
Organization: Houses of the Holy


cha 94, chi 100   01apr92

cha (29-43)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
johnson,larry     39    2  14   0  0   0  0   - 10   3   4  1  1  0  0  0    4
gattison,kenny    36    4  11   0  0   3  4   -  8   1   3  0  0  0  0  0   11
gminski,mike      22    4   9   0  0   0  0   -  3   2   0  1  1  1  0  0    8
bogues,muggsy     36    4   9   0  0   0  0   -  1   7   1  1  0  0  0  0    8
gill,kendall      38   13  21   0  1   6  7   -  8   4   1  2  3  0  0  0   32
reid,j.r.         34    5  14   0  0   3  4   -  9   3   2  1  3  0  0  0   13
curry,dell        28    7  14   2  2   2  2   -  4   1   1  1  0  0  0  0   18
lynch,kevin        7    0   0   0  0   0  2   -  3   0   1  0  2  0  0  0    0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cha totals       240   39  92   2  3  14 19   0 46  21  13  7 10  1  0  0   94
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .424   .667   .737       team rebs  7

chi (60-13)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
pippen,scottie    42    5  14   0  0   8  8   - 10  12   4  1  3  2  0  0   18
grant,horace      41    3   7   0  0   0  0   - 14   3   2  1  1  1  0  0    6
cartwright,bill   20    4   5   0  0   0  0   -  4   2   1  0  0  1  0  0    8
paxson,john       25    7  10   0  0   0  0   -  1   5   1  0  2  0  0  0   14
jordan,michael    39   11  22   1  3   8 10   -  2   5   2  3  2  0  0  0   31
king,stacey       14    2   4   0  0   0  0   -  4   2   2  1  1  0  0  0    4
williams,scott    12    3   3   0  0   0  0   -  4   0   2  0  0  1  0  0    6
armstrong,b.j.    16    0   6   0  2   0  0   0  0   1   1  0  1  0  0  0    0
hodges,craig      10    3   7   1  4   0  0   -  1   1   0  0  0  0  0  0    7
hansen,bobby      10    1   3   0  2   0  0   -  2   1   2  0  0  0  0  0    2
levingston,cliff   4    1   2   0  1   0  0   -  2   0   0  0  1  0  0  0    2
perdue,will        7    1   2   0  0   0  0   0  0   0   0  0  1  0  0  0    2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
chi totals       240   41  85   2 12  16 18   0 44  32  17  6 12  5  0  0  100
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .482   .167   .889       team rebs  7

cha   28  22  25  19  -   94
chi   25  25  28  22  -  100

attendance 18362, time 1:56, officials: JODonnell,ROlesiak,EFRush
-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Wear Your Heart on Your Sleeve Department:
Go Bulls, Go Bears, Go Broncos, Go Blackhawks.
From: h0j1297@rigel.tamu.edu (BURT J.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Home Court for Det-Bos????
Date: 10 Apr 92 15:30:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr9.214927.1@galluj>, 11mwarner@galluj writes...
> 
> 
>Hi.  I was just wondering about Pistons-Celtics for the playoffs.  If they end
>up tied with each other in the 4th and 5th positions, who gets the home court
>advantage?
> 


The team that won the series played during the season will be the team that has
home court advantage.

******************************************************************************
*  Burt J.                              Internet :   h0j1297@rigel.tamu.edu  *
*                                       Bitnet :     h0j1297@tamrigel        *
******************************************************************************

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro