HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: vir8334@tamsun.tamu.edu (Vince Rhee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: TAN .sig test and apologies
Date: 23 Jan 1993 19:51:52 -0600
Organization: Dallas Cowboys -- 1992-93 NFC CHAMPIONS
NNTP-Posting-Host: tamsun.tamu.edu

Our own Liz Fox <lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu> states :
>
>I apologize to EV for stealing part of his new .sig but I couldn't help
>it.  I put it in last week and havent had time to post with it and then
>he comes back and there it is!  Actually, EV - you should do something
>"'Boys related" until after the Super Bowl, don't you think??

	Steal? Naaahh -- too strong a word. Besides, the proliferation
	of good taste (in this case, good music) should know no
	bounds, right? :-) 

	And as for having a 'Boys-related .sig, I'm trying to think
	of a suitable one as we speak. For now, my "Organization:"
	line in the header is going to have to do! 8^)
	
>So here's my new .sig:
>
>       %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>  Liz "Big Banana" Fox    Carnegie Mellon Fine Arts    lf01@andrew.cmu.edu  
>                   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%                         
>              I want a full house and a rock 'n' roll band
>                  Pens that won't run out of ink,
>                      and cool quiet and time to think...   
>              Shouldn't I have this? Shouldn't I have this?
>                  Shouldn't I have all this and ......
>                      Passionate Kisses from you....
>                              *Mary-Chapin Carpenter
>                   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%   

	You know, I was going to attribute it to M-CC, too, but I
	figured the Lucinda Williams purists out there would
	scream bloody murder! (after all, Lucinda did do it first)
	But Mary-Chapin's cover is bloody well awesome!

	'Course, I guess we could use the first stanza, so...

		Is it too much to ask
		I want a comfortable bed that won't hurt my back
		Food to fill me up
		And warm clothes and all that stuff
		Shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have this
		Shouldn't I have all of this and
		Passionate kisses, passionate kisses
		Passionate kisses from you....

	Ta! (it's Sat. nite and it's time to go out!!!)

TTFN,
- EV

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vince Rhee		vir8334@tamsun.tamu.edu 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
	Is it too much to demand
	I want a full house and a rock 'n' roll band
	Pens that won't run out of ink
	And cool quiet and time to think...
			- Lucinda Williams, "Passionate Kisses" 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria)
Subject: Re: AMC: Spoilers (Langley)
Organization: MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:05:56 GMT

In article <93021.133103JSNYDER@auvm.american.edu> Joni Snyder <JSNYDER@auvm.american.edu> writes:
Re: langley and feebs (have they split up?)


>The last time I remember seeing Langley was when he was working at
>Kelly's.
>Joni Snyder

Joni, I would imagine this means one of two things:

1) Feebs *has* split up with Langley and mentioned it only none of us
heard it. OR

2) Feebs has split up with Langley and didn't mention it. When she
does, she might say something to Brooke like: I didn't want to tell
you because....(or something like this). In essence she has been keeping
it a secret. To my knowledge, this has never been mentioned til this
storyline starts. This is the way I figure it must be.

I could be wrong but if I'm not, Hope this helps! :-)

CAZ


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jereese@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (jean reese)
Subject: Re: SB: Cruz' history
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 13:10:10 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.213255.20381@rayssd.ssd.ray.com> d8b@sgfb.ssd.ray.com (Denise M. Boudria) writes:
>In article <C15zFv.Ayn@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> jereese@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (jean reese) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan20.080947.17403@netcom.com> cap@netcom.com (Caroline Smrstik) writes:

>>
>I think they got married because Tori told Mason that she was pregnant with
>his child (I have no idea why they slept together).  I have the vague 
>impression that she found out she was pregnant, knew the father was Cruz,
>didn't to marry Cruz, seduced Mason, claimed the kid was his and forced
>(well not really force, guilted??) him into marrying her.  
>
>Does this sound right?

I just picked up the issue of Daytime TV that everyone should get, and
it cleared out the cobwebs (but not in all areas). Anyway, Tori and Mason
were married so that the kid would have a Capwell inheritance. Mason
probably went along with it to get back at CC.

Jean

>>
>>
>>Jean
>>
>>
>>>Caroline
>>>
>Denise
>


-- 
	"It is my view that the  vegetarian manner  of living by its 
	purely physical effect on the  human temperament  would most 
	beneficially influence the lot of mankind." - Albert Einstein
	++++++++++++++++jereese@silver.ucs.indiana.edu+++++++++++++++
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mcmahon@nd.edu (Sheila M. McMahon)
Subject: GL: Test
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 13:37:41 GMT

This is just a test. Feel free to ignore me.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: tcarsten@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Teresa C D Carstensen)
Subject: Re: GL: Future speculation (SPOILER)
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 13:17:53 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.000206.2605@news.nd.edu> mkelly@ovid.helios.nd.edu (michael kelly) writes:
(regarding what unexpected person will comfort Ed)  
>You folks aren't even trying! (although I liked the Ed/Frank suggestion)

OK, how about Roger?  Someone pointed out that the comforting could be 
done platonically and doesn't necessarily mean that Ed's getting a new
squeeze.  I could see Roger and Ed calling a truce long enough to spend some
time talking about how much they miss Maureen.  

I like the Frank and Ed suggestion, too, except that I think Frank 
deserves better than Ed.  

>
>Other than Holly, I would vote Eve as being the 2nd most predictable
>liason for the good Doctor. The match I'd like to see with Ed would be
>none other than Bridgette. Of course, this might mean Ed raising yet
>another Thorpe, but I have a feeling Bridgette may try to replace Mo
>in mo' ways than one. But hasn't the poor girl been through enough? 

Ooh, what an evil thought!  Blech, ptooey.  That match-up would utterly 
give me the creeps.  Bridget definitely deserves better than that.  I 
would much rather see her with Frank or with Rick if he ever comes back.

>
>>See, then Rick Bauer can come back to town & he and Daddy-o can go mano a
>>mano over the Mindster, who, as we know, has never really gotten OVER
>>Rick...
>
>Wha'? Strike that and reverse it. As I recall it was Rick who was hung
>up on Mindy. 

Well, you could match Ed up with Mindums, then have Rick come back and get
freaked out over it.  

>It's too bad that the old Rick (the actor) has sworn off of
>soaps.
>
>--
>+               Mike Kelly, Notre Dame Department of Physics                +
>+                                                                           +
>+ mkelly@doc.helios.nd.edu          "The more you drive,                    + 
>+ mkelly@undhe5.hep.nd.edu                 the less intelligent you are."   +


TC Carstensen 
-- 
tcarsten@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu         
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: wayneh@microsoft.com (Wayne Hazle)
Subject: Re: SB:  Leila's lengthy con report
Date: 22 Jan 93 17:57:04 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.
Distribution: usa

In article <29996@oasys.dt.navy.mil> greenlaw@oasys.dt.navy.mil wrote:
 
> Evening:
> 
> We had pizza for dinner and then settled down to watch old video tapes.
> There was one from 1985 that had Robin Wright as Kelly when she was in the
> mental institution and Pearl (boy do I miss that character) trying to help
> her.  

Ah Pearl!!!  What a great character.  Remember when he found out his brother 
Bryan was alive? 

I will never forget how he fell in love with Kelly while they were in the 
institution.  When they got out he professed his love to her, but she saw 
him only as a friend.  I was enraged and crushed, especially because I was
in my sophmore year in college and I had just gotten "let's just be friends"
from a woman I was MADLY in love with.  My whole sophmore year was a wash
after that...



Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: fbrown@ssd.kodak.com (Frank Brown)
Subject: Re: AMC: An Li
Organization: Eastman Kodak
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 16:07:19 GMT

In article <2B5F245E.27218@news.service.uci.edu> llmacdon@orion.oac.uci.edu (Linda Macdonald) writes:
>>>
>>>Okay now, wait a minute here.  I *must* have missed something
>>>somewhere along the line...how could Taylor and Terrence "get
>>>together?"  Aren't they related by the fact that they have the SAME
>>>FATHER?  Or (and this is what I may have missed), is Lucas only
>>>Taylor's step-father, and no biological relation to her at all?
>>>
>>>"Too-busy-to-always-read-every-single-post" minds want to know!
>>>
>>Just in case you havent heard Taylor is biologically related 
>>to Lucas. However Terrence is really his son.
>>
>I think you mean Taylor is NOT biologically related to Lucas.  Lucas
>is her step-father.
>
>Linda Lou
>>Frank
>>
>>
Yes thats right. I left the NOT out. Have you collected
all your winnings yet? Spend it all? :^)

Frank
>>
>
>


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: slaury@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Susan Laury)
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: Garrison Keilor's Innaugural Poem: WANTED
Organization: Indiana University
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 20:35:48 GMT

Lance, thanks for posting the real poem in it's entirety.
It is really beautiful.

Here is a (vaguely) related request: the Sunday before the
innaugural Garrison Keilor read his own poem for the Inauguration
that was quite funny. Does anyone have the text of that one?

Sus.

-- 

"I always thought that if I were popular, I must be doing something wrong."
			--Suzanne Vega
From: sher@umbc.edu (Sherri Crain)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: comments on 1/14 show (Thursday)
Date: 22 Jan 1993 01:10:06 -0500
Organization: Univ. of MD, Baltimore County
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: umbc4.umbc.edu

In article <1699@emdeng.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> jreeves@emdeng.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Jacki.A.Reeves) writes:
>In article <mcmahon.257@nd.edu>, mcmahon@nd.edu (Sheila M. McMahon) writes:

>> >Where does Mindy get off using Maureen's death as an excuse not to work,
>> >when she knows damned well it's Nick she's thinking about.  What a
>> >b*tch!
>> 
>> Did she have a copy of the Springfield Journal, or is Maureen so well known 
>> that her death made the New York papers?? When she was reading the obituary,
>> it was as though she was reading about a stranger, rather than about someone 
>> she knew very well. Someone should have told the actress, "you are very good 
>> friends with Maureen's step-son, so as a result, you spent a lot of time at
>> the Bauer house. You knew Maureen very well and liked her, so lets see a 
>> little sadness, and it wouldn't hurt you to turn on the tears a little.

>She was reading the Springfield Journal.  I purposely looked to see what
>was going on there.  I know some people who have their hometown newspaper
>delivered to them by mail to other cities, so this didn't seem weird to
>me.

  Yes,but Billy had already told her about Maureen's death prior to her
reading the Springfield Journal.  He tried to use this as a means of
convincing her to come back home...you never know when someone close to
you is gonna go.  So,if she was so upset about Mo's death,I would think
it would've hit her sooner.

Even if she had used Vanessa (the need to support her through Mo's death)
as an excuse,I could've forgiven her,but she obviously couldn't care
less that Mo is dead. Her only concern was that Nick might want her
back.  HA!

She got what she deserves and she can't handle it.

i
n
e
w
s

f
o
d
d
e
r

-- 

     Lack of planning on your part                 -sher   
doesn't justify an emergency on my part     sher@umbc3.umbc.edu
From: aleta@cs.cornell.edu (Aleta Ricciardi)
Subject: Re: AMC: Update Thurs. Jan. 14
Organization: Cornell University, CS Dept., Ithaca, NY
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:56:35 GMT

In article <199301251535.AA05886@donne.unx.sas.com>, alex@unx.sas.com (Alexandra Bost) writes:
|> aleta@cs.cornell.edu (Aleta Ricciardi) writes:
|> 
|> >|> Who's Katie Beers?

|> Oh, GREAT.  Like we need to give other sick, twisted people out there a 
|> few more ideas on How To Exploit Children.  Sheesh!
|> 
|> >i'm writing a letter describing
|> >exactly how sick and vile i think this is.
|> 
|> Good idea -- why don't you pass along the address...

	i was thinking of 

		director of programming
		abc / cbs / nbc television
		new york, ny / los angeles CA 

but i don't have the specifics.  i think tv guide prints the 
contact address of all networks.  anybody got a copy???

|> Alex

	aleta
From: kristyp@coos.dartmouth.edu (Kristy Patterson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC TAN:  Marriage for Jackson??  YES!!!
Date: 28 Jan 93 21:44:26 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

In article <C1JL63.9Cz@tsoft.net> casper@tsoft.net (Johanne Kaminski) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan20.220644.8603@zeus.ieee.org> sbookey@ep.ieee.org writes:
>>>
>>>As far as I can see, there is no reason for this storyline.   I hope it ends
>>>soon and that Jack finds someone he can *marry*.  So far, he's the only adult
>>>who hasn't.  IT seems people either have multiple marriages or none at all.
>>
>Jack would make a great (soap) Dad!!!
>Here's my idea:
>Jack could meet the woman of his dreams (no mystery women, and not Erica).
>They could have the most romantic courtship!  He could save her a few times
>(the white knight) and she can save him from a lonely life of solitude.
>They can have the wedding of the century (Bigger than Luke nd Laura), try to
>have a baby, perhaps have a miscarriage or two, have trouble conceiving, but 
>then finally, they have a healthy beautiful baby girl!
>Since no marriage can remain happy on a soap (except for the pot menapausal
>group) Jack's wife could die at childbirth (stroke sounds good) leaving 
>Jack's Character full of new possible storylines, only this time he will
>have a new and deep love, his little girl!
>
>Sounds good to me!
>
>Johanne

I like your idea, but I think AMC might be among the few that have this
particular affliction.  I don't really follow any other show (disclaimer! :-)
but reading SOD, etc., it seems that on other shows, younger couples CAN
stay together for a LONG time (or at least keep breaking up-getting together-
breaking up-etc.).  I catch GH maybe once every 3 years, but it seems like
Sean and Tiffany, or Robert and Anna (before they died, I guess) were younger
couples with some longevity.  On Y&R, (which my grandmother watches) it seems
like Ashley/Victor/Nikki were a triangle FOREVER.  But on AMC, Erica just
moves from guy to guy, and never seems to really look back, and there seems
to be NO tension now with some of the guys that once were the "love of her
life" (like Jeremy; to see it now you'd never know they had a relationship
at all!).  That's one reason (flame suit on :-) ) that I hope that Tad and
Dixie get back together (at least for awhile :-) ).  After all they went
through, plus this flashback, "remembering the woman he loved," all her
needing him junk, I think it would be really jarring to have him be with her
for like 2 months then move on to Hayley (or Nat?  Sheesh!).  Surely it's
possible for SOME couple under 60 to stay together; maybe Trev and Nat will
be it.  (Wonder if they'll let Tom and Liv stay together?)

Anyway, my $0.02!

-Kristy
--
   +=========================+===============================================+
   |Kristy Patterson         |      "Diplomacy is the patriotic art of       |
   |kristyp@mac.dartmouth.edu|           lying for one's country."           |
   +=========================+===============================================+
From: GC.AVW@forsythe.stanford.edu (RAGIN CAJUN)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Scott
Date: 21 Jan 1993 01:49:34 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <C15xK1.J6p@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>,
comjudi@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Judi Geistlinger) writes:
>zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria) writes:
>
>>In article <C11uDH.8Lq@tsoft.net> casper@tsoft.net (Johanne Kaminski) writes:
>
>>>So, if Stuart is Scott's legal father, and the biological father is dead,
>>>then who does Scott live with and where do they live???
>
>>Scott LIVES with Stuart. Tho we NEVER see him. He has disappeared from
>>sight for I would say 2 years now...we don't know why. The last kid
>>that played him was really cute. He was about maybe 9...or 10. I bet
>>he will come back about 18, which he almost should be by this point!
>
>How can Scott live with Stuart in that tiny 1 bedroom apartment? Is there more
>of the place that we never see?
>
>Judi
>--
>

It is actually a 35 bedroom mansion with 27 bathrooms with marble
tubs and gold fixtures.  Each bedroom has its own jacuzzi.  What we
are actually seeing is the carriage house.  They don't live there
they only use it for entertaining their down to earth friends and
relatives.  ;^)

Alma
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: holst@xenon.arc.nasa.gov (Laura Holst)
Subject: OLTL: A&Dw/SOM: Cord
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Ames Res. Ctr. Mtn Vw CA 94035
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 03:42:00 GMT

Armed and Dangerous with Soap Opera Magazine...

John Loprieno revives his role as CORD, starting
January 29.

Wonder how self-righteous he'll be, this time.

--Laura Holst
E-mail:  holst@xenon.arc.nasa.gov  Decnet:  XEN::HOLST
S-Mail:  NASA/Ames Research Center  MS 219-1
             Moffett Field, CA  94035-1000
P-Mail:        (415) 604-6588
From: alex@unx.sas.com (Alexandra Bost)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Erica
Date: 21 Jan 1993 07:43:50 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

patricia@pete.uucp (Patricia Peterson) writes:

>My daughter noticed today that when Erica was going back to bed
>she had shoes on.  I was not watching the screen so I said "they
>must be bedroom slippers"  To which my daughter said, "No, they
>are shoes, high heels.  I reversed the tape and sure enough Erica
>had on a pair of 2-3 inch heels.  How many of you keep a pair of
>heels by your bed when your in the hospital?

When I saw Jean LeClerc here in Raleigh last year, he said that
Lucci ALWAYS wears high heels in bed scenes.  [This is why all
her leading men have scraped-up shins! :)]  Apparently, Lucci
does not like the way she looks (short) when she steps out of the
bed in those scenes, so she always wears the heels.

And I thought she walked particularly well in them, too, considering
Erica has a broken ankle...  :-)


Alex
Organization: The American University - University Computing Center
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:29:07 EST
From: Joni Snyder <JSNYDER@auvm.american.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Character glut
 <1993Jan21.085146.1266@mala.bc.ca> <1jpatfINNpsj@emx.cc.utexas.edu>

In article <1jpatfINNpsj@emx.cc.utexas.edu>, johnson@emx.cc.utexas.edu (Karen
Johnson Morgan) says:
>
>In article <1993Jan21.085146.1266@mala.bc.ca> bridges@mala.bc.ca writes:
>
>>Maybe we could break up Big Bird and Tyrone too.
>
>Tyrone was too scary for me!  It was posted here long ago that he did
>AMC and Sesame Street at the same time, but SS made him quit AMC because
>they were afraid little children who watched AMC with their mothers
>would be totally freaked out. :-)

Is Gordon from SS really Tyrone?  I only started watching SS (with my
son) about 4 years ago and never made that connection.  Tyrone was
on AMC in the mid 70's , like 73-75, I was in high school then and
would come home for lunch to watch AMC.  Funny twenty years later I'd
be doing the same if there were no VCRs.  Gordon has been on SS a long
time, wouldn't you get sick of SS after that many years.  We have
several SS tapes and I can't stand more than about 2 hours in a row. :)

Joni Snyder
>
>>Doug
>
>Karen
>
>--
>        karen@louise.ae.utexas.edu   -or-   johnson@emx.utexas.edu
>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: EFS6ET1@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU
Subject: DOOL: Protest songs to send to TPTB
Reply-To: ecz5mxr@mvs.oac.ucla.edu
Date: 21 Jan 93 10:32:54 PST

Sis Garlic has given my an idea and I wanted to know what others
on the net thought.

In the past months, there have been some brilliant songs posted
regarding our disgust with DOCL in general and Carly specifically.
Wouldn't it be fun to record these on cassette and send them to
TPTB with instructions to play the cassette?  (We could also send
them to the major soap mags as well, with lyrics inserted (and
copyrighted!))

Can anyone out there sing?  (We could also create a net chorus
if needs be.)

What do you all think?  Is it an incredibly lame idea?  Or is
anyone game?

*Razzie
From: levine@parc.xerox.com (Joel Levine)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC
Date: 24 Jan 1993 00:08:46 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


In article <1993Jan22.124139.23310@ll.mit.edu> gibbsm@ll.mit.edu 
(MargAret D Gibbs) writes: 
>
>In article <1993Jan20.182325.4432@island.COM> diane@greenland.island.COM
>>writes:
>>I know that everyone else is talking about Tad/Ted and about how long they
>>are stretching out finding him, but I think that the MOST fascinating
>>development on this show is the recent "loss" of Erica's memory.  
>
>I was very glad that the writers didn't drag out Erica's memory loss the
>way they are doing Tad's - it's fun to see her only pretending to have
>amnesia.  I like to watch her make Dimitri (whom I have never liked much)
>squirm!
>
>>Not only will there be implications for Dimitri, but for Hayley as well.
>
>However, I wish Charlie would let Hayley in on the secret...
>
SPOILER ahead (well a mini-spoiler, from the 2/2/93 issue of SOD I
picked up in the supermarket today: (I don't have a CTRL-L so I'll
just leave a bunch of lines)
















They said that this storyline will have major implications for 
Charlie and Hayley's relationship during Feb. because of the sweeps.
So that also implies Erika will keep up the amnesia charade for awhile...
it is a lot of fun to see her being so comedic!!  It is also probably
another attempt to impress the *powers that be* for the Emmy nomination....

-Debbi J-L