HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.couples
Subject: Re: 2 More Inches, please
Date: 24 Jul 92 15:47:31 GMT
Organization: Dept of Computer Science, Heriot-Watt University, Scotland

In article <1992Jul21.231254.7597@u.washington.edu> intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
>In article <1992Jul21.154020.1358@lub001.lamar.edu> lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu writes:
>
>>Most guys would keep thier women better satisfied if they had 2 more inches.
>>'Course I am *NOT* speaking for myself!
>
>Oh no .. of course not.  You sound like you're the type of guy who needs
>at least 5 more inches.  Does the phrase "Is it in yet?" ring a bell?
>
>Angelwing - People who don't edit articles really piss me off.
>

Agreed. Sounds like the sort of guy who needs not just a length wise increase,
but a vast increase in the girth of it.

Neil


****************************| Sig' Time |*********************************
JANET: 	  neilp@uk.ac.hw.cs   *   Neil Postlethwaite, Rm G.25, 
INTERNET: neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk   *   Dept of Computer Science,  
UUCP: 	  ..!uknet!hwcs!neilp *   Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton Campus
                              *   Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.
------------------------------*-------------------------------------------
Computer Science Account      *   Phone +44 (0)31 449-5111 x4174
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Soc.singles.deity.funny
Date: 24 Jul 92 18:27:27 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

swann@acsu.buffalo.edu (Stephen Swann) writes:

>In article <70366@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>>
>>But maybe we should go a round in the ring for the title of
>>soc.singles.deity.funny, just for the heck of it.

>What, you want me to prostitute my work?  Turn the delicate art of humor
>into a mud-wrestling spectacle for the masses?!

>OK.

Uzi - check   
Marshmallows  - check 
Syllogism detector - check
Lime jello - check

Name your weapon.

--
Stef                 In the force if Yoda's so strong, construct a
stef@apple.com       sentence with words in the proper order then
                     why can't he?                               /fortune

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: terrylee@wpi.WPI.EDU (The Cookie Goddess)
Subject: Re: long hair
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 10:02:44 GMT

In article <12362@mahon> mahon@Software.Mitel.COM (Ed Mahon) writes:
>
>How do the net.ladies feel about *guys* with long hair?
>
I absolutely *adore* long hair on guys.  I definately prefer it over short 
hair.  Come to think of it, I don't know of any short-haired guys I've been
really attracted to.


terrylee



Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: carl@vaxr.sscl.uwo.ca (Carl Kaufmann)
Subject: Re: Boink-Ann Arbor
Organization: Soc.Sci.Comp.Lab., U.West.Ont.
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 16:56:18 GMT

In article <1992Jul28.000846.11251@med.umich.edu>, blackp@med.umich.edu (Jeremy Thomas James) writes:
> 
> I was curious to see how many people would be interested in this...
> Whether in Ann Arbor or somewhere near by in Michigan.

I think that this is a wonderful idea.  NYC is a bit far for me (I live in
London, Ont.) but Ann Arbor is well within range.  BTW, the timing for "No
Name" is great (long weekend for us Canucks).  Too bad the location is so
inconvenient.

Carl

*****************************************************************************
* See how the heart reaches *  Carl Kaufmann   * No one has to do anything, *
* out instinctively, for no * Soc.Sci.Comp.Lab * except bear consequences.  *
* reason but to touch.      *    U.West.Ont    *                            *
*       -Kate Bush          * carl@sscl.uwo.ca *       -Me                  *
*****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Oh I Know What You Mean
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 21:19:07 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In  <1992Jul30.132252.7929@wetware.com>  drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>
> Why last Saturday, My ProblemOlderWoman
> want to Have Sex rather than watch
>
> HeManMasterOfTheUniverse!!!!!
>
> Can You Imagine that!

Mine at least wears her SheRa costume for the event...

> The hard part is getting the velcro off of your RP...

You're doing it wrong.  The parts with the 5 long wiggly bits are for
getting the velcro off.  The hard part is for Something Else Entirely.

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
From: fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Used threads
Distribution: world
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 21:46:56 GMT
Organization: GRW Enterprises

tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu writes:
> fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter) writes:
> >Like "could you do your dishes more often ? I did them again because the
> >smell of the food rotting on them was turning my stomach"
> 
> I sometimes encounter people like that, but I try to keep my future
> contacts with them to a minimum.

Kinda hard to minimize my contacts with her - I live with her.

> (However, in cases where you don't want to take the effort to modify their
> behavior, a display of temper can be a perfectly appropriate tactic.)

Actually, I was using the display of temper as an effort to modify her
behaviour. It worked for about a week.

	fred
From: lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Breast Puns
Date: 22 Jul 92 18:37:17 +1700
Organization: Lamar University - Beaumont

In article <1992Jul22.155954.430@cbnewsd.cb.att.com>, nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
> In article <MARTINC.92Jul22114137@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>>In article <k-fmntp.aahz@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius) writes:
>>
>>Thank you for making a clean breast of it.
>>Another thread of puns?  I bet we can return you tit for tat.
> 
> Ah, a thread like this is sure to bring back some great mammaries.
> 
> -Nance
> -- 
 
I just heard today that I was going to have to upgrade my PC to 16 megs,
So, I am off to the electronics parts house to get me a bunch of fast
"Mammary Chips"  (HeHeHe  Roaring laughter in background!@&)
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Define "FEMININE" anything goes...
Date: 30 Jul 92 05:12:38 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:

>I like a woman that has her own dipstick and isn't afraid to use it.

Hmmmm. In what?

--
Stef                 Where am I going, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
stef@apple.com     

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: female correspondence
Keywords: jeep
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 04:50:57 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1992Jul21.011004.25656@spool.cs.wisc.edu> rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon) writes:

>And all of this of course makes your obnoxious condescending attitude to him
>oh-so-okay, is that it?  I'll remember that.  I'm sure it will come in handy
>someday.

Micheal, Star Trek postings would be off-topic here, too, because
there's a newsgroup _made_ for them.  What are we supposed to do, just
pay no attention?  I am a Fidonet echo moderator; if you want to see
the consequences of never letting people know they are off-topic, just
go there for awhile and read the drivel that infests most of the open
echoes.  If you now want to abandon your earlier issues and object to
my wording, I suggest three things: 1) that you think about the pun you
missed in the first reply, 2) that you suggest alternate wording that
makes you all warm and fuzzy inside, and 3) that you go check out the
flame I sent to the guy from the BBS in Florida.  Something in there is
bound to be be good for you in some way.

Have a great day,
Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Heaven knows / No frontiers
And I've seen heaven in your eyes			- Jimmy McCarthy
From: Bonger
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 28 Jul 1992 13:34:30 GMT
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.89.16.47

In article <1992Jul27.182840.6897@sbil.co.uk> mikeu@dinar.sbi.COM (Michael
Urbanski) writes:

>Bonger, you should seek help.  Let's pretend you're 23 years old.  Besides the

>fact it is ILLEGAL (in the USA), you're messing with a child's mind.  Never
>mind the fact she's horny, hot, ready and willing, at 14 she is not mentally
>ready for this.  She is also probably not ready for the quick dumping that
would
>follow.  I mean, it is not like you can be SEEN with this little piece
>of jailbait. 

Oh, please. Now, I'm some kind of psycho. First of all, I didn't say it was
something I go out and do. I know better than that, but it's something that is
not totally estranged to my mind (or any inquisitive adults mind, probably).
Also, I must differ on your view about 14 being too young for sexual relations.
It's hard to draw a line, but if I would draw it anywhere, it would be 14 or
15. Most girls in that age do know what sex is about and the way the original
question was formulated, this girl is not out for a relationship.  

>Try again, Bonger.  You're mixing apples and oranges.  The couple who are 30
>and 40 are both mature adults.  The couple who are 14 and 24 are not mature
>adults.  One is confused and the other is a criminal.

So, you think that it makes no difference whether this girl gets together with
a 20 year old or a 40 year old? I think there is a BIG emotional difference
there....

>And use your real name.  I've got to tell your local police to keep an
>eye on you.

That's exactly why I don't use my real name all the time (I do use it). IT used
to be where you could express your feeligns and thoughts freely, but now there
are too many NUTS out there, who take your thoughts and harrass you with it, or
threaten you with the POLICE (sound familiar &-) )



								#Bonger# in your face
From: fy03+@andrew.cmu.edu (Francis J. Yenca)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Unconventional ways to meet SO's
Date: 22 Jul 92 00:44:49 GMT
Organization: Masters student, Industrial Administration - 3rd Yr. Opt., Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

>Ok, Let me hear about unconventional ways you met your current or >ex-SO's

We met on my front porch.

Frank
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Why are Women *SO* Vain ??
Date: 23 Jul 92 23:50:51 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <Brv78t.y7@acsu.buffalo.edu> swann@acsu.buffalo.edu (Stephen Swann) writes:
>
>>Trygve   (Of course I'd be surprised if anyone would object to a dripping
>>          wet Terra.)
>
>Good for the crops, too.

I bet if I saw a dripping wet Terra it would make my stalk grow.

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: topless
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 23 Jul 92 14:24:14 GMT

stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>Personally, I think it should be illegal for men to take off their shirts*.
>It's quite distracting for some of us.

And for the men involved as well.  Personally, whenever I remove
my shirt, the women around me tend to go into a frenzy and begin
chanting "put it on!".  :-)

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
From: lub001.lamar.edu!lairdpg@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 22 Jul 92 05:34:00 GMT
Organization: Lamar University - Beaumont
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In article <1992Jul22.110524.8580@cs.hw.ac.uk>, neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil 
Postlethwaite) writes: 
> Ok, a new thread just for Charlie. Probably more for the male audience
> than female I think.

> Given the opportunity if you came across a seriously gorgeously horny
> girl who was very repsonsive and willing to get to bed with you, but
> you knew she was only 14 years old.
> 
> Would you ??
> 
> a/ Without a second thought
> b/ Only if you knew you would not be caught
> c/ ?
> 
> Personally probably b), but depends on the circumstances I guess.
>  
> Regards,
> 
>  Neil

I would have to turn and walk away but kinda kinked over as I would probably
still be rather horny myself (Expletives deleted).
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Used threads
Date: 22 Jul 92 20:56:19 GMT
	<ewillims.711803388@unix1.tcd.ie>
	<1992Jul22.174803.3516@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu's message of 22 Jul 92 17:48:03 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.174803.3516@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:

   in <MARTINC.92Jul22113603@grover.cs.unc.edu>
       Charles R. Martin writes

   > Don't you all think these problems would be solved if you just grew
   > about 10 inches and gained 75 pounds?

   Weeell, I don't know if that would make the shipping people any more
   punctual, but it would make answering the door lots more fun.  (Have
   to get a taller front door for proper effect, though.)

Actually, I think having the top of your head disappear behind the lintel
probably is just as effective.

   Trygve    ("You rang?")

Uur-r-r-r-r-r-rh?
--

Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens. -- Schiller
Ergo bibamus! -- Goethe
From: grubb@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Gary A. Grubb)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:33:26 GMT
Subject: Shared housing San Jose
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: soc.singles

I would like to share my home with a clean and sober man or woman.

Two bedroom house in a nice neighborhood near Willow Glen. The location is 
central to most areas. There is a large yard and some storage. 

The house is very nice and comfortable. There is a 
large kitchen and bathroom. 

Furnished or unfurnished. (same price)

The rent is $350.00 monthly with a $175.00 deposit.

One younger child OK. Add $25.00.

My name is Gary Grubb. Call me at 408 297-8152 or email me at:

gary@hpoemta.sj.hp.com

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 22:08:55 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In  <1992Jul24.154515.3091@news.acns.nwu.edu>  drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
> I suspect that this "allure of youth" isn't something that attracts most
> women. A 14 year old boy, no matter how pretty, would simply be of no
> sexual interest to me at all. So am I right ladies and gentlemen, is this
> really a gender difference?

That agrees with my experiences.

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjj@mits.mdata.fi (Joni Jarvenkyla)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 16:31:01 GMT

In article <1992Jul26.112830.3818@cs.hw.ac.uk> neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite) writes:
>In article <1992Jul23.210858.9131@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> strake@coos.dartmouth.edu (strake) writes:
>>Now lets take a look at it. Mark has a good point. It is entirely dependent
>>on the society. I'm not saying its good or bad, but society defines what
>>is commonly considered good or bad. Imagine this world
>>all children are taught about sex by their parents. when their children
>>reach puberty, fathers sit down with their sons and explain things to the sons,
>>show them the more common ways of masturbation, and show them immediately that
>>masturbation is not bad and is in fact healthy.
>>Mothers do the same things with their daughters, perhaps even laying down with
>>them and doing 69 with their daughters to show them how such things feel, how
>>they should feel, what is bad, etc.  (fathers would also do this with their
>>sons) then, fathers would sit down with the daughters and being very careful,
>>and loving, and supportive, perhaps even with the mother looking on, take the
>>daughters virginity in a joyous rite of womanhood. Mothers would do the same
>>with their sons for a rite of manhood.
>
>I'm not really sure what to say here. I'm a bit speechless.

And the writer of the most of the above probably very clueless.

I mean: everybody should have at least that much curiousity in them so
they'd be interested in how their bodies function. There's nothing wrong
with manuals (hard data), but I think the exploring part should be let
to the "marrying" couple only.

Oh these older people, they sure know how to seduce somebody younger. It
only happens way too seldom (or should I frequent aging people's dancing
clubs?). There's nothing wrong in seducing somebody for sex, but mixing
the "love" starts being brainwashing/reprogramming/whatsoever.

-- 
jjj@mits.mdata.fi             Kirjoitatko sin{ n{it{ ihan selvin p{in?
jjj@niksula.hut.fi                          -Petteri J{rvinen
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max)
Subject: Re: HOW CAN I TELL?
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 15:07:48 GMT

In article <92203.182722U15479@uicvm.uic.edu> <U15479@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:
>   I need the net's help again on a problem I am having.  I was dating a girl
>last year and really liked her but she wouldn't commit because she went back to
>her ex-boyfriend.  

[rest of the description deleted]

This "girl" is in a holding pattern waiting for "Mr. Right", you aren't it
but you are nice enough not to pressure her so you fill the time/social gap
while she waits. 

Surely you didn't need me to tell you this?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams)
Subject: E.W. - The Lovers Guide...
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 17:46:01 GMT

Well, I finally got to see the video last night called The Lovers
Guide, which caused such outrage, furore,and general mayhem when
it was released for consumption here in Ireland.

Talk shows on TV and the radio were discussing it for weeks. You'd 
think it was a blue movie produced by Satan by the reaction from
certain factions here, instead of being a fairly basic guide as to
what to expect from a committed and loving relationship. It is an
invaluable source of information and help for those who are too shy
or embarrassed to ask for what they want in a sexual situation and
I find it very hard to see what all the fuss was about.

To be honest, it was more like a sex-education class in school but
less clinical.
Recommended for anyone who feels they could benefit......

(I hasten to add that I only watched it for reasons of curiosity....
I'm way beyond that!!! [*GRIN*])

    ____________________________________________________________________
    |   Emma Williams            | Dad, I guess you're wondering why   |
    |   ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie    | I'm ringing you..--Calvin & Hobbes  |
    |				 | (eller Steen og Stoffer :-> )       |
    |____________________________|_____________________________________|
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: cocoa@iat.holonet.net (Elise - little 'e')
Subject: Re: Net.Women 
Organization: The Chocolate Factory
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 04:25:35 GMT


In article <13813@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>|blackp@med.umich.edu (Jeremy Thomas James) writes:
>|>I friend of mine and are are having a dispute as to whether there
>|>are actually any good looking net.women that read this news group.
>|>Any suggestions as to how this dispute could be settled?
> 
>Having met all the women that post to this group I'd like to confirm that
>each and every one of them is good looking. Unfortunately, for
>you and your friend, all the men are good looking as well. At least they're
>better looking than you and your friend.

Well I know you met me because I was there, but *exactly* when have you
been seeing these other women?  Hmmmm?

Good looking men you say?  I thought I hid them all so no-one would find
them.  How did they get out?  (ObThought: Must remember to change the
Acme lock on the male vault to prevent further escapes). :)

>Just kidding with the previous answer.  Actually, we're all nerds and 
>nerdettes.  Even the women wear pocket protectors and have tape on their
>glasses.

Excerpt from my personal mail today to support John's allegations:

     me: "Hapiness is a new MacKermit"
     he: geek


Just me,

little 'e'

- -
"nerd sanity check is in the mail"

-- 
Recently re-located, and now permanently residing at _The_Chocolate_Factory_
*  *   e-mail: cocoa@iat.holonet.net    -     voicemail: 415-337-4940   *  *
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: I Had Crabs With Steve
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 13:44:48 GMT

In article <1992Jul24.070757.2809@dg-rtp.dg.com> morton@rtpnet06.rtp.dg.com (John R. Morton) writes:
>I often notice that posts are obviously intended for one person, or
>a small group, sometimes with a " you had to be there", to understand
>type of content...

When someone posts frequently and becomes popular and sometimes even
legendary, lots and lots of people become curious about that person.
If curious enough, they'll send email in hopes of getting acquainted or
they'll peruse the net looking for bits and pieces of information.

>And I am at a loss to imagine why the poster thought
>the entire USA wanted or needed to read it ?

It's not uncommon, John, for two or more of such people to get together and
"report back" to the net about what that person is like vis a' vis.  With
someone of high "visability" on the net, yes - lots of people are interested
in reading about it.
>
>I email out of vogue, or do some consider their flirtings of National
>importance.... or maybe something else I overlooked ??

Er .... "flirtings" ???  Some people get together for dinner and this
constitutes flirting??
>
>hopeleslly without a clue,

Yeah, no lie.

-Nance
-- 
Nance Colucci  *^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*  | Discussions welcomed. 
att!ihlpk!colucci                               | Trollers discouraged.
From: mcytera@nl.oracle.com (Mark Cytera)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Calling non-North Americans
Keywords: USA, Canada, Anglo-Saxon
Date: 31 Jul 92 13:28:24 GMT
Organization: Oracle Europe

I sometimes get time to read this newsgroup, but have never
posted here. What has struck me more than anything else is the
constributions come almost exclusively from the USA and occasionally
other English-speaking countries. What about the rest of the world?
Aren't there any people here in Europe who have similar
aspirations? It would seem from the point of view of a Martian who had
just logged in to soc.singles that only Americans play the dating game.
I'm sure that isn't true....

Answers please! (Flames welcome)

Mark


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Cytera                    Telephone: 31-3406-94881
Email: mcytera@nl.oracle.com
Snail: Technical Publications, ORACLE EUROPE, Rijnzathe 6, 
        3454 PV  De Meern, The Netherlands
----------------------------------------------------------------------------