HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kd8@cbnews.cb.att.com (martin.e.hartwell)
Subject: VIC20 for sale
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 20:19:00 GMT




	FOR SALE

	Two Vic 20 8 bit computers complete. One doesn't work, both power supplies
	are good. Have cables and rf unit also.


	$20.00 you ship


	Marty Hartwell KD8BJ  Phone 614/855-2470 home 614/860-2091
From: depolo@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Jeff DePolo)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.swap
Subject: VHF/UHF antennas for sale
Date: 18 Aug 92 04:18:37 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

o Cushcraft 32-19  2m Boomer yagi
  - 22' boom
  - 19 elements
  - all hardware, balun, etc. included
  - manual included
  - completely dissassembled, ready to go
  - used for about 15 months, removed when relocated QTH
  - $139 new  -  sell for $70

o 2 Diamond F718A 70cm collinears
  - 15' long
  - rated 11.5 dBi gain
  - used for 4 months at a repeater site, replaced with a SuperStationmaster
  - excellent performer for either home or repeater use
  - excellent condition
  - original Diamond package, manual, hardware
  - $239 new, sell for $150 each or both for $270

o Comet B10NMO dual-band mobile antenna
  - very small - about 12"
  - looks just like a cellular antenna
  - black, cellular-like open phasing coil in the center
  - rated 2.15 dBi gain on 440, unity on 2m
  - used for about 4 hours for a comparison test, new condition
  - original Comet package
  - make offer

o Decibel Products 2m 4-pole array
  - originally ordered for 151 MHz - works great on most of 2m, SWR
    starts to climb below 145 MHz - would be great for a repeater antenna
    (Decibel's bandwidth spec is 10 MHz)
  - includes all original phasing cables
  - no mast - you mount it to a mast or tower legs with supplied clamps
  - very good condition
  - $75

All the prices listed are what I would like to get.  If you think a
price is ridiculous, let me know and maybe we can work something out.
Shipping not included.
							--- Jeff
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Jeff DePolo  WN3A              Twisted Pair: (215) 386-7199                  
 depolo@eniac.seas.upenn.edu    RF: 443.800+ MHz    442.700+ MHz    24.150 GHz
 University of Pennsylvania     Carrier Pigeon: 420 S. 42nd St. Phila PA 19104
From: rwc9664@evtprp0b.UUCP (Robert W. Carey)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Have You had this problem with your PA-6?
Date: 18 Aug 92 16:36:55 GMT
Reply-To: rwc9664@evtprp0b.UUCP (Robert W. Carey)
Organization: Boeing Computer Services Everett Propulsion, Everett WA

In article <77843@ut-emx.uucp> davros@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Buddy Brannan) writes:
>Have you ever had the following problem with your PA-6 Yaesu DC converter
>and battery charger thingy?     .......  stuff deleted ......

>So ... if you've had this problem, is there a solution? Like ... How can we
>fix it?          ....... stuff deleted .......

>With mine it's gotten to the point where, if you move the radio with the 
>PA-6 on it and a cord plugged into it to an external battery, it goes out.
>
>73
>
>Buddy, KB5ELV


I have this same problem.  It's real annoying.  I've given up on it 
until I can figure out what to do.  Has anyone been able to fix theirs?

Rob,  N7UVN-- 
|Rob Carey          (I feel more like I do now than I did before.)         |
|Boeing Computer Services                     rwc9664@evtprp0b.boeing.com  |
| My opinions are MINE, not Boeings!                                       |
From: Jim_Sollows@mindlink.bc.ca (Jim Sollows)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Kenwood Service SUCKS!!!
Date: 22 Aug 92 04:20:11 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: world

I had a wonderful experience with the folks at Kenwood recently. I had a
Kenwood handheld that had a dead battery pack. I opened the pack and found a
charred component (looked like the pack had been shorted). The component was
either a resistor or diode but was no longer recognizable. I called Kenwood to
find out what the item was and the value so I could replace it and repair the
pack. Kenwood told me they would not give me that info and that I should buy
another pack, "We dont want people fixing those" was the reply the tech gave
me. I explained that this appeared to be the only problem and I would like to
try a repair before spending another 100 bucks. "Sorry thats too bad was the
reply. I followed his advice and bought a new pack --- on my new ICOM handheld.

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: m14494@mwvm.mitre.org (Mike White)
Subject: Re: Compact HF Beam Antennas?
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 15:44:09 GMT

Dave Whitlock writes:
> I'm looking for info on small HF beams.
> The only one I've discovered so far is the Butternut "Butterfly" beam
> for 20 through 10 meters.

I looked into these a while back. The consensus was that while there
was some directionality on 10 meters, on 20 it worked about like
a rotatable dipole. Good luck.
73,
Mike, N4PDY

************************
* These are my opinions only.*
************************
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: root@chamber.in-berlin.de (Patrick Wendt)
Subject: Kenwood TS-450S - mods wanted.
Keywords: mods
Organization: Zombie's Burial Chamber, Berlin, West Germany.
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 11:06:26 GMT

HI !

I'd like to buy a Kenwood TS-450S and would like to know
if there's a possiblity to modify the RX and TX range of
this transceiver. - I would wonder if you couldn't modify
this rig to TX all over 150kHz up to 30MHz.

Any information welcome.

73!, Pat, DD6PF.

-- 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 -  Patrick Wendt  |   root@chamber.in-berlin.de |  Zombies Burial Chamber  -
 -      DD6PF      |   root@megiddo.in-berlin.de | Public UNIX Sys-V 386/33 -
 - - - - - - - - - | pwendt@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de | Data: +49 30 / 402 56 92 -
 - Berlin, Germany | HamRadio-BBS: DD6PF @ DB0GR | HST D.S. 14400bps V32bis -
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     And all what we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.    E.A.P.
From: jfw@ksr.com (John F. Woods)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: QST Content
Date: 17 Aug 92 10:31:50 EDT

fdvlba@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (Fort Davis VLBA site) writes:
>The usage of OM, QSO, QRM, QSY, etc  seems well established on phone.

"QRM" on phone has always struck me as especially silly, since if there is
any, you can't hear the difference between "QRM" and "QRN"...
From: OBERG%GVAX.DEcnet@SCFE.NWC.NAVY.MIL
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Antenna drilling
Date: 12 Aug 92 08:19:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: SCFE.0095EFDA.E6A26880.25440
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

In response to Brian's, N0SFG question on drilling a hole in his car roof
I suggest he use a hole punch such as one of Greenlee Tool Co's hole
punches.  I have used them many times and they make a beautiful hole that
requires no filing and doesn't warp the surrounding metal.  
Contact :  Greenlee Tool Co.
	   4455 Boeing Drive
	   Rockford, IL  61109

Disclaimer:  I have absolutely no affiliation with Greenlee Tool Co.  Use
whatever brand you prefer, that's just the one I happen to have.


Bill, N6ZTZ
From: pechter@ocpt.ccur.com (Bill Pechter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Wanted Santec HT1200 mods
Date: 12 Aug 92 17:35:36 GMT
Reply-To: pechter@ocpt.ccur.com (Bill Pechter)
Organization: Concurrent Computer Corp.,Information Services

Are there any mods to the Santec HT1200 to get out of band receive
such as NOAA weather.  I miss the capability on the old guy.

Bill
From: charlier@hplsla.hp.com (Charlie Panek)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Zig-zag LP antenna info request
Date: 18 Aug 92 17:49:00 GMT
Organization: HP Lake Stevens, WA

>koning@koning.enet.dec.com (Paul Koning) writes:
>
>steveh@hpcvra.cv.hp.com (Steve Harper) writes:
>|>Does anyone know where I might find design equations, etc.
>|>for zig-zag LP antennas?  Interesting article in QST a while
>|>back, but real limited applicability...
>|>
>|>Thanks,
>|>Steve kf7wy
>
>The March 1992 issue of RF Design had a an article about a neat design
>(for HF portable application).  I think it may have been patented...
>
>	paul, ni1d
>
>----------
  Our club here at work put one up for Field Day,  One of the members got
a copy of the patent disclosure, which helped amplify the information
in the RF Design article quite a bit.  It was also written up in Bill Orr's
column in CQ recently.  Beware, though, I don't think the dimensions in
his column were quite right; he seemed to have too many zig-zags in too
short of a horizontal space, given the info in the patent.  I also dont
know why he makes such a big issue about the expense of the termination
resistor; we just paralleled up a bunch of 2W metal film resistors to 
make about a 25 W unit- worked just fine.

  It seemed to work reasonably well, though;   as advertised; the 
SWR was less than 2:1 from 160-10.  Efficiency didn't seem to be too good
on 80 and 160, though.  On 20 it seemed about equal to a 20 meter dipole
at about 75 feet.  

  I fed the dimensions into ELNEC to try to analyze it.  I'm not super
confident that the results are too precise, because I had to push ELNEC
to the limit, but it seems to show a nice elevation pattern, peaking at
about 20 degrees elevation, and a very broad azimuthal pattern, with
a few dB of F/B ratio.  It also seemed to show that the resistor does
help the F/B ration quite a bit.

  If anyone's interested, here's the dimensions we used:

 Baseline = distance along the rope running along the ground to the
            point where the wire bends there.
 Topline  = distance along rising rope to each top 'peak'
   Both are measured from the feedpoint end, at the point where
   the baseline and topline converge

 Height   = height of each 'peak'

 N   Baseline      Topline      Height
 0   4ft  2in     5ft 10in     3ft  1in
 1   5ft 10in     8ft  2in     4ft  3in
 2   8ft  1in    11ft  4in     5ft 11in
 3  11ft  3in    15ft  9in     8ft  2in
 4  15ft  8in    21ft 10in    11ft  4in
 5  21ft  9in    30ft  4in    15ft  9in
 6  30ft  2in    42ft  2in    21ft 11in
 7  41ft 11in    58ft  7in    30ft  5in
 8  58ft  3in    81ft  5in    42ft  3in
 9  80ft 11in   <-termination resistor goes here.

Bibliography:

  "Radio Fundamentals";Bill Orr;  CQ; August 1992; p58
  "Radio Fundamentals";Bill Orr;  CQ; June 1992; 
  "A Field Expedient Broad Band HF Antenna"; Bernard Feigenbaum; RF Design;
      Mar 1992; p 135

--
Charlie Panek 			Hewlett Packard Company
charlier@lsid.hp.com            Lake Stevens Instrument Division
KX7L                            Everett, Washington
From: mleech@bnr.ca (Marcus Leech)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Converting 49MHz toy radios.
Date: 17 Aug 92 19:34:32 GMT
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Information Techology Division

In article <9208171904.AA11437@ucsd.edu>, William=E.=Newkirk%Pubs%GenAv.Mlb@ns14.cca.CR.rockwell.COM writes:
|> the mod instructions we had were from a past issue of Ham Radio Magazine and 
|> delt with the single channel Radio Shack 49 MHz unit.
|> 
I (and VE3KMV) tried to modify the 5-channel FM model (TRC-503), which is
  PLL synthesized.  Problem is, the synthesizer "knows" too much, and the
  VCO is potted in goop, so it's hard to retune.

The initial approach was to simply change out the 10.240 clock for one of
  a higher frequency (10.680MHZ, as I recall). The problem is that the
  10.240MHZ crystal is also used to provide an LO for the 2nd IF, so you
  still need 10.240MHZ.  Since the PLL "knows" too much, you can't just
  retune the VCO and play with the divide ratio in the PLL.

It's almost like it was specifically designed *not* to be modifiable for
  6M band. Sigh.

-- 
Marcus Leech, 4Y11             Bell-Northern Research  |opinions expressed
mleech@bnr.ca                  P.O. Box 3511, Stn. C   |are my own, and not
ml@ve3mdl.ampr.org             Ottawa, ON, CAN K1Y 4H7 |necessarily BNRs
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: rtaylor@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Roger Taylor)
Subject: Re: Dentron Clipperton-L
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 13:35:36 GMT

shaw@email.ncsc.navy.MIL (Shaw) writes:
>y Dentron is out of business (no telephone) and the Sprague capacitors are proprietary so no one stocks the 100uF, 500V electrolytic capacitors. HELP!

>BOB AC4MI (not a Tibet callletter)

	I substituted 4 standard 100 uF 450 volt caps for the 3 at
	500.  There is a slight but unnoticable drop in total capacitance.
	You might measure your high voltage.  It it stays under 1200 you
	can use just 3 450s.  Be sure to put the balancing resistors across
	each capacitor.  K9ALD.
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: dls@genrad.com (Diana L. Syriac)
Subject: Re: FAQ - do you prefer the long form or the short form
Organization: GenRad, Inc.
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 13:10:05 GMT

In article <1c0m#zp.mont@netcom.com> mont@netcom.com (Mont Pierce) writes:
>In article <#19m41j.pdh@netcom.com> pdh@netcom.com (Phil Howard ) writes:
>>mont@netcom.com (Mont Pierce) writes:
>No.  According to on of the FAQ coordinators (I don't remember his name)
>Brian has been doing this for some time even though they asked him not to.
>I think I would also be upset if I was trying to provide a service and 
>someone took all my work, reformated it and reposted it!

I couldn't figure out which one of you wrote this, so I left both "writes":.
Brian has been after us (read that "me" up until about a year ago) to combine
all the FAQs together, for his convenience.  Unfortunately, he wasn't 
listening to the reasons WHY we (I) couldn't do that; he still isn't.

There are some Usenet sites which do not allow email OR articles of greater
than 65K bytes long.  MINE was one of them.  Yes, I did in fact try....and
it got rejected by MY site.  Therefore, I couldn't post the FAQs....and, once
I gave up the FAQs to another person (thanks Ian and Paul!), I was still 
unable to RECEIVE articles of greater than 65K bytes long.  Our system simply
throws them away.  There is something in the software that limits the size
of news articles.   And I have no access to ftp, so that's not a solution 
either.

Brian has been complaining about this for about 2 years.  Now that it belongs
to someone (Ian) who has no limitation on size, I suppose that it COULD be
combined.  But then you're basically saying that all those poor souls who 
cannot get such a large file are doomed to never see the FAQs again.  What's
the purpose of an FAQ if it can't be gotten at by the people who want to see
it?  Is this discussion really worth the bandwidth it's using up?

->Diana L. Syriac (Carlson) dls@genrad.com	Ham: KC1SP (Sweet Pea)      <-
->I'D RATHER BE FLYING!	P-ASEL, INST		CAP: 1LT, Freedom 690 Mobile<-
->AD ASTRA, PER ASPERA				Airplane: C-172 N6513E	    <-
->GenRad, MS/6, 300 Baker Ave, Concord, Mass.  01742  (508)369-4400 x2459   <-
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: zben@ni.umd.edu (Charles B. Cranston)
Subject: Re: Carpet Loop Antenna (receive only!)
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Organization: UM Home for the Terminally Analytical
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 21:52:52 GMT

I hope everybody reading this understands that this is an
SWL or listen-only antenna.  If some poor soul connects
his transmitter to this antenna it will be bad news for
diodes D1 and D2...

zben@ni.umd.edu     -KA3ZDF
From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Gamma vs. T match
Date: 13 Aug 92 03:04:20 GMT
Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Gannett Technologies Group

In article <103360107@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> goris@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Andy Goris) writes:
>Gamma vs. T match.

While it seems reasonable that since coax is unbalanced, an unbalanced
matching system would be best, it's not usually true. Depending to an
extent on antenna physical construction and feedline routing, the T match
almost always gives better current distribution in the driven element and
almost always reduces undesired feedline radiation. If you look at commercial
VHF/UHF yagis, the best ones generally use the T match while cheaper ones
use the Gamma. Cushcraft uses the T on it's boomers and the gamma on it's
lower performance antennas. KLM uses the T. At HF, the difference doesn't
seem as important and many good beans use the gamma match. Other issues,
such as feedline routing, mechanical design, mounting methods, and antenna
placement usually will play a bigger role in antenna performance than
the matching method. Given that, I will say that my experience has been
that the T match is superior at VHF/UHF.

Gary KE4ZV
From: palsson@ucselx.sdsu.edu (Jerry Palsson)
Subject: Re: QST Content
Organization: San Diego State University
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 13:48:47 GMT

Julian's points about "destinated" are well taken, but he really
shouldn't cite the OED as a reference source.  The fact that "destinated"
appears there is irrelevant to its current usage.  The OED is a
wonderfully rich record of words that have been used in the English
language, and as such it contains many words that have been dead for
decades (sometimes centuries).

I don't like the word either, but Fred Lloyd's comments about usage
eventually determining correctness are right on the mark.
-- 
Jerry Palsson AA6KI ..............
palsson@ucselx.sdsu.edu ..........
gpalsson@library.sdsu.edu ........
San Diego State University Library
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,sci.electronics
From: wa2ise@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (robert.f.casey)
Subject: 60Hz magnetic fields in your house
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Keywords: health hazard, or not significant
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 22:34:20 GMT

Was reading a late copy of IEEE Spectrum articles on the possible, but
undetermined, health hazards of 60Hz magnetic fields.  Mostly from 
powerlines.  Article mentioned that one source of such fields are unbalanced
current flows in the house's safety grounds.  I used a clip-around
current transformer and a DVM meter set to current mode, and measured
water pipes, powerline "BX" cables (armored shield and power wires all
at the same time, if balanced, should show zero current reading) and
the power wires feeding the house.  First "calabrated" the measuring 
equipment with a power cord feeding a 60W load.  Split the cord so I
could measure only one of the 2 wires (So I would have an order of
magnitude understanding of the DVM readings).  The house has an
underground conduit for the powerline from the power company, a
safety ground to the copper water pipe, and "BX" cable thruout the
house.  Safety ground is connected to the powerline neutral at the 
KW meter and runs to the water pipe where that enters from outside.
Well, I found about 1 to 2 amps of current comming from the power
company and about the same current going in the water pipe.  (Note:
I'm guessing directions here, and guessing that I don't have the 
water pipe and power company adding instead of balancing).  
Safety ground has about .7 amp, and the fat "BX" cable feeding the 
circuit breaker panel had about 1.2 amp.  Found about 1/2 amp on some
water pipes near the furnace and water heater.  Also found about an
amp on the water pipe above where the safety ground connects to it.
(Must be places in the house where water pipes touch the armored cables)
Currents changed somewhat randomly, and not usually corrolated with
our power demand.  We may be acquiring current from the buried conduit,
and sending it into the water pipe (dirt in the ground does have
resistance).  Or comming from another house.

The point of all this is there are sizeable unbalanced currents running
around all over the house.  Is it a problem?  As far as shock hazard
goes, no.  And are the magnetic fields a problem?  who knows...  
You might be suprised to find such currents running around your house.
If you have a clip on current transformer (mine is a Fluke, and I used
a Beckman DVM) try measuring your water pipes!
From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: QST, in my opinion...(short)
Date: 20 Aug 92 13:09:53 GMT
Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Gannett Technologies Group

In article <1992Aug19.124456.20420@dbs.com> adair@dbs.com (Owen Adair x3690 Atlanta) writes:
>
>Geesh! You guys get a life!  Ham Radio is supposed to be a *hobby* which
>is supposed to be *fun*.  I may agree (or not) with Fred, but I think
>there's too much gnashing of teeth about a non-issue.

Lighten up Owen, gnashing of teeth *is* a hobby, and many of us find
it more fun than working some guy sitting on a rock in the Pacific
ocean for a silly award. :-)

Gary KE4ZV
From: ron@pilot.njin.net (Ron Natalie)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Cellular Frequencies
Keywords: cellular, legal
Date: 19 Aug 92 13:40:19 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

> This may be a FAQ, but is tuning in to cellular frequencies legal?

No.  If these things were "radios" (which they are but that's not
important) then your original assumption might be correct.  However
congress was coopted by the cellular telephone industry a few years
ago to mandate an expectation of privacy that's not really there.
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (EPCA) makes it illegal to
listen to Cellular, IMTS, or MTS telephone calls (but not cordless
handset phones).  Yes it's stupid, unenforceable and doesn't provided
any real security, but you're talking a lot of MONEY in the cellular
industry versus a small amount of sanner sales.

-Ron

Brandywine Communications (the commercial side of Delaware Amateur
Radio) has a slogan on the side of their truck:
	"The privacy of a phone with the convenience of a radio"
or was it
	"The privacy of a radio with the convenience of a phone"

I can't remember now...
From: awoolf@rp.CSiro.AU
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: unsubscribe
Date: 14 Aug 1992 19:35:36 -0700
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
From: Gfoley@anniston-emh2.army.mil
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: KENTUCKY:  Central KY repeaters
Date: 13 Aug 92 18:59:08 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu


In article <johnr.713288259@mik.uky.edu>
johnr@mik.uky.edu (john s roberts) writes:
 
>
>I would very much appreciate knowing what the local repeater frequencies
>are.  I am aware of one operated by the Bluegrass Ham Radio Club at
>176.76 minus 600kz tx, however would like to learn about others.  Is
>there a list?  Should be.
>
>Thanks for your help!
>
>John
>--
>        /\/\  John S. Roberts, Jr.     Internet: johnr@mik.uky.edu  /\/\
>        \/\/  3466 Flintridge Drive        NeXT Mail Accepted       \/\/
>        /\/\  Lexington, Kentucky      Home: (606) 272-1417         /\/\
>        \/\/  40517-1119                                            \/\/
 
John:
 
	I am originally from Richmond, KY and was recently in the area.
The information Tim posted is correct also there still technically exists
(though not very active) the Wilderness Trail ARC in the Berea area.

	Some repeater frequencies in the Blue-Grass area are

	146.715         Berea
	146.82          Irvine
	146.76          Lexington
	145.45             "
	145.49          Nicholasville
	147.12          Winchester
	147.33          Mt. Sterling
	146.91          Morehead
	146.97          Stanford
	147.24          Frankfort
	146.61          London
	146.88          Somerset



	There are a few others around, but I can't remember them at the
time.  These are the main ones that I used.  There are also a couple of
link repeaters to the 145.19 system in Ohio.  One is 145.17 near Stanford
and the other is 145.29 (I think) in Lexington.

	Someone will be around on one of these to give you more info.  Have
a good trip there.

	Glenn Foley/KO4OL (formerly KA4MTX)
	2038 Canterbury SQ.
	Anniston, AL 36201