HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hgs@wdl1.wdl.loral.com (Harry Salvini)
Subject: Re: Master Tracks Pro and Windows 3.1 - HELP!
Organization: Loral Western Development Labs
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 14:55:29 GMT

In article <1992Apr12.003238.7113@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>, rhysling@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (RHYSLING MICHAEL S) writes:
> 
> I just upgraded to Windows 3.1.  Overall, I'm pretty pleased but I can't
> get Master Tracks Pro to work anymore.  I get the feeling I need to do
> something with the Midi Mapper utility in Windows but I'm not sure.
> 
> The Midi setup menu in Master Tracks Pro changed after I installed 
> Windows 3.1!  Instead of listing my MQX-32m interface, it showed the
> Soundblaster and the Midi Mapper as choices but I couldn't get anything
> to work.
> 
> Has anyone managed to make these two work together or do I need to call
> Passport :( ?
> 
> Please reply via e-mail.

NO!  Please Post!  Some of us are having all kinds of problems with
Windows 3.1 and midi.

Thank-you Microsoft!!!!

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| O O  hgs@wdl1.wdl.loral.com -- Kathy's Hubby & Jonathan's Daddy  O O |
|  v    BTW: LORAL doesn't have anything to do with my opinions.    v  |
| \_/              I came up with them all on my own.              \_/ |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: obryan@gumby.cc.wmich.edu (Mark O'Bryan)
Subject: Re: SC-155
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 01:48:27 GMT
Summary: Roland SCC-,MT-,D- family compatibility
Organization: Western Michigan University

In article <1992Apr3@smsc.sony.com> dce@smsc.sony.com (David Elliott) writes:
> 
> As I understand it, the line is:
> 
> 	SC-55		Original Sound Canvas module
> 	SC-155		Sound Canvas module with sliders
> 	SCC-1		Sound Canvas on an AT board
> 	JV-30		Sound Canvas in a keyboard
> 	JV-50(?)	JV-30 with aftertouch and other improvements

This is a good summary, although the last item is the JW-50, which includes
a built-in sequencer and floppy disk drive.  Both keyboard units also add
128 Sound memories to the basic Canvas, and the JV-30 adds 8 Performance
memories.  The SC-155 also has User Sets for instrument assignments, vol-
ume, and pan settings.

The family also includes:

	E-15		Sound Canvas in a keyboard
	CM-300          Sound Canvas in a plain white box
	CM-500          CM-300 + MT-32 in a white box

While the entire family provides a sound set that corresponds to the MT-32,
none of them except the CM-500 is fully MT-32 compatible, including the
sys/ex commands.  Roland has always been fairly careful not to make ex-
cessive claims regarding MT-32 compatibility (if you read things carefully),
but their most recent literature explicitly disclaims full compatibility
on the SCC-1, SC-155, etc.  The CM-500 is actually two sound modules in
one: a 24-voice GS module, and a 32-voice LA module.

The original MT-32 family includes the following fully compatible units:

	MT-32		"the standard"
	CM-32L		MT-32 in a plain white box
	CM-64		CM-32L + a CM-32P PCM module in white box
	LAPC-1		MT-32 on a PC card
	MT-100		MT-32 packaged with a PR-100 sequencer
	RA-50		MT-32 plus Intelligent Arranger
	E-20?		MT-32 with a keyboard

The E-20 is the only one I'm not sure supports the full MT-32 sys/ex
capabilities (it may have fewer memories?).

Of course, then there's the D-family: D-5, D-10, D-20, D-110, and GR-50,
which have some overlap in MT-32 sys/ex compatibility, but different 
sound ROMs.

Hopefully, this will help to clear up some confusion, and eliminate
some speculation about Roland's infinitely repackaged technology.

-- 
Mark T. O'Bryan                 Internet:  obryan@gumby.cc.wmich.edu
Western Michigan University
Kalamazoo, MI  49008
From: eirikur@ranger.enet.dec.com (Eirikur Hallgrimsson)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: MOTU Apparently Now hiring ex Radio Shack Employees for Tech Support
Date: 10 Apr 92 00:40:35 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


In article <1992Apr9.190720.19009@news.media.mit.edu>, mbl@media.mit.edu (Marc LoCascio) writes...
Marc, that's a good authoritative answer.  What about a near-term solution
involving SCSI?  Oh, you said you didn't have a product requirement for better
than 4X MIDI bandwidth.  Oh, well, John needs one, and I certainly like to have
a lot of headroom, myself.


Eirikur Hallgrimsson   | "Hey, what *is* that thing?  It looks like a telephone
eh@ranger.enet.dec.com |  switchboard trying to mate with a Hammond organ!"
PATHWORKS for Macintosh|
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: obryan@gumby.cc.wmich.edu (Mark O'Bryan)
Subject: Re: DidINukeMy Performer in Install?
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 15:44:03 GMT
Organization: Western Michigan University
Summary: Copy protection *totally* ineffective?

In article <1992Apr14.174418.5597@smsc.sony.com> dce@smsc.sony.com (David Elliott) writes:
> 
> Companies that put copy-protection in their software will hopefully
> wake up to the fact that they aren't stopping any software piracy,
> and are just annoying the hell out of their customers.

I won't argue about the "annoying the hell" aspect.  As a user, I hate
copy protected software at least as much as most, and probably more so
than many.  I refuse to buy CP software, and when I've found out after
the fact that it was CP, I've returned it.

I've also refused to copy protect any of the software that we develop,
just on the basis of principal, although I suspect that has hurt us to
some extent (I do MIDI software on the Atari ST).  It hurts when you
send out a thousand copies of a free update that you've put hundreds
of hours into, only to hear that it's on pirate BBS's in California,
New York, and Chicago within 24 hours.

On the other hand, do you really feel that "they aren't stopping any
software piracy"?  It seems to me that the installation method that
many companies use must eliminate at least the casual copying/sharing
that frequently occurs?  If it wasn't stopping any, i.e., it was so
easy to circumvent by casual copiers, then the legitimate owners
wouldn't find it such a hassle either and be complaining all the
time.  Right?  Or am I missing something?

-- 
Mark T. O'Bryan                 Internet:  obryan@gumby.cc.wmich.edu
Western Michigan University
Kalamazoo, MI  49008
From: newshound@bogus.u.washington.edu (Kraig Eno)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Roland JV-80
Date: 7 Apr 92 01:00:00 GMT
Organization: University of Washington

Geez, I just spent part of the afternoon at the music store pounding on
keyboards.  Played with the JD-800 for a while, had some fun, but then
I moved on to the JV-80 to see what you guys have been talking about.

What an insipid board.  I didn't ask how much they wanted for it (was
afraid they might force me to take it with me when I left), but I wouldn't
pay more than about $300.  The only things I liked were the bass response
and the fact that notes kept sounding across patch changes (at least they
did one thing right).  Other than that, it sounded like a toy.

What is Roland's "best" board now if they don't make the D-70?  Or do
they have any good ones at all?  The JD-800 was fine, but it didn't look
like what I'd want as the centerpiece of my sound, really.

I feel a lot better about buying a Wavestation after today, that's for sure.
From: aiadm@aifh.ed.ac.uk (Andrew D. Milligan)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: SC-155
Date: 6 Apr 92 17:53:48 GMT
Reply-To: aiadm@aifh.ed.ac.uk (Andrew D. Milligan)
Organization: Dept of AI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland

>>Bruce Cheng writes:
>>>From article <1992Apr02.091434.3188@convex.com>, by cowles@convex.com (John
>>Cowles):
>>> I have just bought an SC-155 Sound Canvas here in Japan (I'm here
>>> on business) for 71000 yen - about $534. If I remember correctly,
>>> the price is MUCH higher in the USA. Am I right?
>>>
>>> The list price was 74000 yen which was discounted 3000 yen.
>>> --
>>>      John Cowles        cowles@hydra.convex.com
>>>                         Convex Computer Corp.  214 497 4375
>>>                         3000 Waterview Pkwy
>>>                         Richardson, Tx. 75080
>>
>>Well, here at U.S. it only cost $360.00 + Shipping.
>
>Hmmmm. It's been a while since I was in Japan, but wasn't the sound canvas
>something closer to 56,000 (*) yen? Also, in Japan you should NEVER pay more
>than
>80% of the list price for almost anything, certainly not for something common
>like a sound canvas. If they won't haggle, go elsewhere.
>
>(*) I may be thinking of the post-80% price, it seems to fit.
>


Please help me - after reading the above I must mention that the UK list
price is 545 pounds (just over US$900). Obviously this is a rip off
compared to other countries so I would like if someone could recommend a
US (or Japanese) dealer who could ship me one for a much lower price.
        I really want one but I can't afford the UK price...

                        Thanks in advance,
                          Andrew D. Milligan.
From: bold@astroatc.UUCP (Jeff Beck)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Kawai K3 patches
Date: 11 Apr 92 17:28:11 GMT
Reply-To: bold@astroatc.UUCP (Jeff Beck)
Organization: Trilogy Musical Group

Hi everyone,

The keyboard player in my band has a Kawai K3 from which, unfortunately,
noone in the band can seem to get good sounds.  If anyone owns a K3,
has programmed some decent patches, and has access to some kind of
recording media such as an Alesis Datadisk (Gee, I'm not asking for much ;-)
I would be willing to pay you for a disk and shipping and something
for your time.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Date:         Thu, 16 Apr 1992 08:44:36 ADT
Comments:     <16APR92.09488766.0175.MUSIC@UNB.CA>
From:         Alan Edwards <AEDWARDS@UNB.CA>
Subject:      MIDI Show Control

Could anybody send me the spec for the MIDI Show Control, or
tell me how much to send to the IMA for a copy.

Thanks in advance,

Alan Edwards
From: david@david.UUCP (David A. Roth)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: MOTU Apparently Now hiring ex Radio Shack Employees for Tech Support
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 16:09:10 EST
Organization: DAVID A. ROTH MUSIC
Reply-To: david@david.UUCP ( David A. Roth )
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.5v4


In article <35100@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> (rec.music.synth), eirikur@ranger.enet.dec.com (Eirikur Hallgrimsson) writes:
> 
> In article <1992Apr9.190720.19009@news.media.mit.edu>, mbl@media.mit.edu (Marc LoCascio) writes...
> Marc, that's a good authoritative answer.  What about a near-term solution
> involving SCSI?  Oh, you said you didn't have a product requirement for better
> than 4X MIDI bandwidth.  Oh, well, John needs one, and I certainly like to have
> a lot of headroom, myself.

Kindly explain why anyone would need more than 4 MTPs on one Mac?
That's 16 MIDI cables per MTP ( 8 ins & 8 outs ) with 16 midi channels
per cable!

David
From: five@sys6626.bison.mb.ca (skinny puppy)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Looking for DIN Sync pin outs
Date: 7 Apr 92 09:33:12 GMT
Organization: system 6626 BBS, Winnipeg MB

Does anyone know what the pins for the DIN SYNC start are?  And what the 
pulse looks like for triggering?  (Ie: Towards ground, or from ground?  
+5V?  What?)
 
I'd like to get my Din Sync - MIDI converter to also run my analog 
sequencer.  Any info on this would be greatly appreciated.
 
Five

;--- (skinny puppy) a user of sys6626, running waffle 1.64
;E-mail: five@sys6626.bison.mb.ca
;system 6626: 63 point west drive, winnipeg manitoba canada R3T 5G8
From: rick@crowbar.aux.apple.com (Rick Auricchio)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Macintosh Powerbook & MIDI
Date: 13 Apr 92 20:46:55 GMT

sjohn@england.ece.cmu.edu (John E. Sasinowski) writes:

>I am trying to use a Powerbook 170 as a sequencer for my VFX-SD, but I'm
>having problems.  I'm posting this in the hopes that someone will let me
>know if I'm doing something obviously (or non-obviously) wrong.

>I have been running the midiscope program from ucsd.edu in the hopes that I'll
>see something (anything!) being transferred across the cables.  So far,
>nothing seems to happen.

	Using Opcode Vision 1.3 and my PowerBook 140 it seems to work
	fine.  I recall Dave Oppenheim (of Opcode) saying that some
	versions of the Portable (probably the old one and the PB100)
	have interrupt lockouts which cause dropped input characters,
	but sequencing should work.

	Possibly your MIDI interface steals power from the serial
	connector?  I'm using the little Apple one.
--
--
Rick Auricchio       rick@apple.com        A/UX Engineering     Mooney N894AR
Apple Computer Inc, 10500 N.DeAnza Blvd MS35VK Cupertino CA 95014 408-974-4227
My opinion is my own. My employer? They use a windsock and a fire extinguisher.
From: eirikur@ranger.enet.dec.com (Eirikur Hallgrimsson)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Starter Keyboard recommendation (was Re: Kawai Spectra: Appraisal?)
Date: 13 Apr 92 19:57:32 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


In article <heys.703124716@odin>, heys@odin.unomaha.edu (Matthew D. Heys) writes...
>I've been offered $400 for a new one, which I've been told is quite a steal -
>what do YOU, the professional-synthesizerally educated, think of the Spectra?

You probably can't beat the price for a new unit.  It is sort of a cost-reduced
K1-type instrument.  The looped samples seem shorter (less useful) and the
overall sound seems less good to me.  I'd be interested in other opinions, too,
because it is the smallest, lightest, velocity keyboard available, and the
price isn't too bad.  For travel/hotel use, I might go for one.

In my opinion, a much better option, sonically, would be a used K1-II.  The
base K1 has phenomenal sound quality, and the -II version adds reverb/effects.
The K1 series as a whole lacks modulation sources, routings, and does not have
filters at all.  That said, my K1r is a staple of my rig that I always use in
one way or another.  Very musical, and the clean audio path just makes my day.
It's not much bigger, has the same good ergonomics and nice case design, and it
is MUCH more flexible than the Spectra.

What do other wizards think of the Spectra?  I know that Metlay was looking at
them for Antartica...for the keyboard.  It can't be strung around you neck
because of the wall-bug, it doesn't have built-in effects (well, has a chorus)
and I just wasn't taken with the sound, myself.

Sample prices (pretty good) from Maggio's in NYC:
Spectra $395  (I think they keep it keep by using less memory)
K1-II $549  My solid recommendation for starter keyboard
K4 $795 (16 bit multi-sampled and adds filters)
K4r $499 
XS1 (14 voice 16-bit samples and Wave synth module.  96 patches 16 multis
   4-way multitimbral+drum 3 demos songs, half-rack box) Sounds like the PHm
replacement. Instead of a PH-50 in a box, it's a Spectra in a box, right???


Eirikur Hallgrimsson   | "Hey, what *is* that thing?  It looks like a telephone
eh@ranger.enet.dec.com |  switchboard trying to mate with a Hammond organ!"
PATHWORKS for Macintosh|

Xref: sparky rec.music.synth:7647 rec.music.makers:5501
From: sherman@induce.enet.dec.com (My name is...)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth,rec.music.makers
Subject: Re: Usenet Tape depression sets in.
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:34:37 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


In article <1992Apr8.133056.6797@icd.ab.com>, jaz@icd.ab.com (Jack A. Zucker) writes...
>In article <1992Apr6.222907.23749@bradley.bradley.edu>, dave@bradley.bradley.edu (David Vessell) writes:

>Well, engineers have money and equipment. Talent ? Who knows ? I used to 

>-Jaz (Fire-proof suit ready)

I think folks have become accustomed to blaming bad-sounding music on poor
equipment.  Though this is true to a point, beyond some level it really doesn't 
matter what equipment you have.  Eventually, the truth has to come out.  And,
if you never master your instrument, you will never be satisfied with it.
All I have is a D70, an MC50 and cheapie home stereo equipment.  I'm not a
good keyboardist.  But, I *know* my instruments - well enough that within 
minutes I can usually flush out ideas from my head.  It takes me seconds to
tweek sounds and parameters on the D70.  I can fly through edits on the MC50.
Most of my time usually involves getting the sound to match what's in my 
head.  And, most composing occurs way from the keyboard, like when I'm doing -
engineering ...  What's most satisfying nowadays is working on music that my
kids and wife love - even prefer over other music.  Getting a lot of
satisfaction out of doing original music for children's theater ...  :)

Steve
From: pgr@ramandu.ext.vt.edu (Patrick Robinson)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Vintage Synths: EML
Date: 6 Apr 92 20:46:41 GMT

metlay writes
> "Others, when the bagpipe sings i' the nose, can scarce contain their urine."
> 
> 							--Shakespeare

Oh, but you left out the first two lines, which seem quite r.m.s-related:

"Some men there are love not a gaping pig; Some, that are mad if they behold a cat;"

Maybe Shylock had a T8... who knows for sure?

:-}

-Patrick
 pgr@ramandu.ext.vt.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: mo@gizmo.bellcore.com (Michael O'Dell)
Subject: Re: K1000 vs K2000
Keywords: 
 
Reply-To: mo@bellcore.com (Michael O'Dell)
Organization: Center for Chaotic Repeatabilty
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 03:30:20 GMT

I have been told that the K2000 keyboard is the usual no-feel
electronic synth keyboard.  the K1000 isn't fully weighted like
a piano, but it is weighted and has some expression to it which
i would not give up. hence i will wait for a k2000Rack.
	-Mike

Bellcore?? Bellcore isn't allowed opinions. these are mine
From: pinto@rbdc.wsnc.org (Mike Pinto)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: arsEnio! Hall!
Date: 10 Apr 92 14:47:48 GMT
Organization: Red Barn Data Center Public Access Unix, Winston-Salem, NC.

jyoung@ecs.umass.edu writes:

>Just to remind U all out there in music-land that his name is ARSENIO....

>not arsInio!

>Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......

   I think ARSEnio works better.
--

-- 
=====================================================================
Mike Pinto                  | If God had intended man to fly, he
pinto@rbdc.wsnc.org         | wouldn't have put all the traction
                            | down here.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: SYNTH-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"SYNTH-L@AUVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 10:39:00 EDT
From:         WSCOTT@WOOSTER.BITNET
Subject:      Re: ... Let's get USENET Recording '92 rolling ...

Craig,

Great, I second your nomination of ;yourself to do this. Why not accelerate
the timetable, though.  I'll bet most people have music to send in right
away.  BTW, what formats can you take. DAT?, PCMonVHS?

Bill Scott
WSCOTT@ACS.WOOSTER.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: defrain@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Paul D. DeFrain -- aka master guru)
Subject: Re: Elvis in keyboard issue April 1992
Organization: Purdue Electrical & Biomedical Engineering
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 16:51:20 GMT

In article <4PB1iB1w164w@inqmind.bison.mb.ca> wesley@inqmind.bison.mb.ca (Wesley Konrad) writes:
>kholland@hydra.unm.edu (Kiernan Holland) writes:
>
>> Does anyone know what kind of trick they were trying to pull 
>> in keyboard magazine, april 1992?? All the writers and editors 
>> pictures were replaced with pictures of Elvis. Keyboard, 
>> Elvis is dead. ;-)
>

Would that be the slim-trim Elvis or the more plump version? My $.29 wants
to know.

pdd
From: pblack@vax1.umkc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Multi-user MIDI systems?
Date: 9 Apr 92 03:08:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: vax1.1992Apr8.210845.2656
Organization: University of Missouri-Kansas City

In article <1992Apr2.160246.4370@lmpsbbs.mot.com>, schickda@mot.com (n/a David Schick) writes:
> 
> Hey, gang!
> 
> Has anyone ever heard of multi-user sequencers or multi-user midi systems?
> 
> The reason I ask is because soon I will have two MIDI-capable computers 
> (an XT compatible and a 486 machine).  I am considering connecting both
> machines to my MIDI patch bay and routing info around so that two people
> can edit MIDI data at the same time.  Consider the following situation:
> 
> 4 people are working on a song that has several existing tracks.  They 
> decide a few tracks need substantial rework.  They play the bass track
> from PC#1 to PC#2, select a patch on the MIDI patch bay that allows
> PC#1 to play only drums and PC#2 to play only bass.  They split up and 
> fine tune each part to perfection, then play the bass back into PC#1.
> 
> I know this is possible, but is it worth the trouble?  Would you wind 
> up really saving any time?  Some considerations would be:
> 
> 1)  Make sure that both users can hear his/her tracks without interference
>     from the other user (possibly use headphones).
> 2)  The musicians tune each part to perfection, play them together, and 
>     realize that the tracks sound like crap together now.
> 3)  It may as long to route the info around as it takes to edit it in the
>     first place.           
> 
> I feel that it's probably not worth the effort to do this, but nevertheless,
> I'm curious and when the equipment is here I will try to implement a dual-
> user studio.  A multi-user sequencer would be much easier to use than the
> situation I have outlined.
> 
> Any comments or flames?
> 
>   - Zoltan                                       
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> | schickda@fl08-g.comm.mot.com                                   |
> |                                                                |
> |              We just THINK we exist in space and time.         |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 


I see no real advantage to doing your example this way.  Why not make a copy of
the file and give the second PC user the disk.  He/she can extract the track,
do the work, then mix it back in, limited only by the sequencer's capability. 
 
If, however, you are trying to dome some sort of live thing combining
controllers/computers, you might be limited by the inability of most MIDI merge
devices to merge more than two or for lots of money, three controllers into one
out.  If you can divide up the receiving modules, then the JLCooper merge works
fine.  

The fact that you are trying though, is worth fooling with, eh?  Don't give it
up on my account.

Phil Black
Xref: sparky rec.music.synth:7941 rec.music.makers:5626 comp.music:2413
From: bsanders@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu (Barry Sanders)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth,rec.music.makers,comp.music
Subject: Re: ... Let's get USENET Recording '92 rolling ...
Date: 14 Apr 92 00:49:28 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

latta@con.Berkeley.EDU (Craig R. Latta) writes:



>	So, if people are getting depressed about not being on the
>last USENET recording, it must be time to think about the next one,
>eh?


Having only re-subscribed to this newsgrope a few weeks ago, I get the feeling 
that I missed something.  Methinks that something is/was a compilation tape.
I want to know more.  Perhaps there are others like me who would like a copy of 
the '91 USENET tape.  Please post more information.  Thanks.

Barry Sanders
bsanders@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: ljnelson@amherst.edu (Starbuck)
Subject: Give me your tired cases yearning to be free
Organization: The 3/5 Quintet
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 06:46:27 GMT

I'm looking for cases.  Two cases, to be precise.  Both soft, if possible,
because they're cheaper that way.  I need one for a Kawai K4 and one for a
Macintosh SE.  Anybody got any they want to sell, or, alternatively, where's
a good place to go to buy new ones?

Incidentally, do they even *make* soft carrying cases for a Kawai K4?

I need these before May 16th.

LAiRD

-- 
LAiRD j. NeLSoN         |       Kella Woona Hulla,
(413) 542-3374          |       Hey Wood Eskay,
ljnelson@amherst.edu    |       I Minawana Waddis,
  II-7b5  V7  I-        |       A Rek-Chu-Hey (4,5)