HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett)
Subject: Re: Dallas/Buffalo
Organization: Abode Computer Systems
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 16:48:12 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.154634.11052@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Imran Qureshi) writes:
>In <wfLUwRK00aw3AAN0hs@andrew.cmu.edu> mg5c+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael D. Goettsche) writes:
>
>6.  Grass field hurts the Team Speed on Defense factor for Dallas

How can you say this? This is the same B.S. that they talked about before the
Cowboys/49'rs game last week at Candlestick about the mud hurting the fast
team. I don't buy that garbage at all. If mud didn't hurt the Cowboy defense
then dry grass certainly won't either.

No way are the Bills going to win this game.

Cowboys by at least 14.

GO COWBOYS!!

Eric
 
-- 

		Internet: eric@abode.ttank.com
		    uucp: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!wvus!abode!eric

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!)
Subject: Re: Wannstedt to Chicago/ NYG's ??????
Organization: Yale University
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:29:48 GMT

In article <C167xt.B5v@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Michael.P.Colburn@dartmouth.edu (Michael P. Colburn) writes:
>From: Michael.P.Colburn@dartmouth.edu (Michael P. Colburn)
>Subject: Re: Wannstedt to Chicago
>Date: 20 Jan 93 21:05:53 GMT
>In article <1993Jan20.182339.28184@news.eng.convex.com>
>bros@convex.COM (Andrew Bros) writes:
>
>> Actually, I think that what cost the Giants was that they are in the
>> same conference as the Cowboys.  Given the choice, I think Wannstedt
>> would rather be in a division where he wouldn't have to play against
>> Jimmy Johnson twice a year.
>
Hey, I'm  back from the dead.  Actually it took me about a week to clean the 
blood off my office floor after I pulled the KNIFE OUT OF MY HEART, when I 
heard DW signed with da Bears  :-(

But I have to agree, it's better for Dave to NOT coach against JJ in the 
same div.  

OK Kids, put your flame suits on!

>Well, Dave...I hope you get along with McCaskey as well as you did with
>Bubba Jimmy...somehow, I don't think so!  

Quite frankly, WHO CARES!  McCasky is a jerk, thank GOD he's in Chicago.
We have our own JERK, Mr. Young who I read a qoute from 2 weeks ago, 
saying there wasnt any room in the NFL for "reclycled coaches" and that the 
G'd were looking for was a fresh coach with new ideas.

Thank you, Mr Deluxe BUTTHEAD Young!  Say that 2 weeks ago and we are 
currently negotiating with a coach who couldnt do SHIT with his current 
personnel.  Oh yeah, even better, this guy is into the throwing mans game.  
Even better to work against the Giants game philosophy.

And while I am on a roll... The reason the NFC East is SO dominant is 
because nearly all the SB winning NFC Easteams have great defense (Giants/
Skins/Dallas)  Just shoot us all now!  Sheeeeeeeeeesh!  I am having one hell 
of a time being optimistic about this deal.

And ANOTHER THING, Count me in on a George go camp.  Before I hire a hit man!
<flame suit off now>

When I calm down a bit, I want to talk about the G's personnel, plan B and 
the draft... 

Adriene IveFallenAndICantGetUP 
(G's in 93, new coach, new look, new life???)
From: whg@acpub.duke.edu (WILLIAM GAY)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Hmmm...
Date: 21 Jan 93 21:56:38 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

Geeez.  I tune out for a week or so and when I come back, I find 49er
fans everywhere involved in arguments concerning flame etiquette or
something.  What could have happened?  Are we hearing the "lamentation
of the women", as Conan said?  Where is the aloof demeanor and
analytical approach to football, guys?  Nice to know y'all are just
human too.  I guess you can start discussing the "potent, surgical"
attack you will have next year.  It's not too early!  And you still have
Steve Young!

Flames to: rec.sport.niners.boo.hoo.hoo.sniff
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Reggie White ?
Date: 23 Jan 93 05:00:54 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


>Rajeev
>GO EAGLES in 1993
>Randall for cortez and #1 draft pick!!
>
>

If you mean that Eagles would give up a first round + RC for Cortez, yeah
i can see this.  The Hawks will probably be able to get a pretty good DE
(Curry or Copeland) in this years draft and Randall wroks well in a system
without an offensive line.

If you mean Seattle has to give up the #1, bwahahahaha!!  There's no way
even the Hawks (remember the Millard incident?) would give up the best
defensive player they have, the hear and soul of that D AND the second pick
overall in next years draft for Randall.  They might as well draft Drew
Bledsoe or trade down and pick Rick Mirer.

satish nair
giants
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: SB Trivia (was: Perfect Dolphins Trivia)
Date: 27 Jan 93 17:36:24 GMT
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath

fbrown@ssd.kodak.com (Frank Brown) writes:
>>B) who was the only team to beat the 49ers in 1984 (the year they beat the
>>   dolphins in the super bowl)?
>
>Wasn't it the Browns? Didn't they beat both the teams that played in
>the SuperBowl that year?

No, that happened in 1981, when Cleveland had wins over San Fran
and Cinci.  (Both on the road!)




--Gidi
From: statesse@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Scott E States)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Ridiculous Halftimes
Date: 26 Jan 1993 05:32:51 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: statesse@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Scott E States)
NNTP-Posting-Host: l130c11.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

> **note**  If that idiot Garth (I love men) Brooks, or Billy Ray
>           (I'm a white man with no rythm at all) Cyrus perform
> 	  at the Superbowl, I swear to God I'll never watch another
> 	  football game for as long as I live.  And I hope some others
> 	  follow my example!!
> 

Well, it looks as if you've seen your last football game - i heard on the radio  
today that Garth will be singing the national anthem.  Sorry about your luck, I  
couldn't live without football - even if they let Sinead O'Connor do the  
national anthem! (I would definitely be able to put the "mute" button to good  
use though! )

Scott E. States
From: rda@planet.bt.co.uk (Richard Avis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: When is the 1994 schedule due?
Date: 27 Jan 93 14:58:38 GMT
Organization: DNM42, BT Labs, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich, UK.
Originator: rda@deimos


Can someone please e-mail me the date when next season's schedule is due to
be released, as I need to know to plan my holiday :-)

Thanks,

Richard A.
From: streb@ee.rochester.edu (Chuck S.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: NEED HELP FOR POLISCI COURSE -Rational PRO&CON WHO WILL WIN!!!
Date: 21 Jan 93 20:02:29 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Univ of Rochester, College of Engineering and Applied Science

I am taken a pol sci course and the goal of two teams is to win!
what are some indicators that give one team the advantage over the
other. 
Fill in under subject ,please do not erase other's comments!

1) pro's for bill's
Jim kelly has something to prove.
Injuries

2) con's for bill's
Wriech is better than kelly and is benched.

3) pro's for cowboy's

4) con's for cowboy's

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
=  Chuck Streb   lookin' before leapin'     = 
=                                           =                     
=  internet streb@galaxy.ee.rochester.edu   =
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: alvstad@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Joel D Alvstad)
Subject: Re: Famous Jerseys
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:59:00 GMT

In article <C16CrH.I76@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Michael.P.Colburn@dartmouth.edu (Michael P. Colburn) writes:
>In article <1jkelvINNlsd@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>
>skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Skywalker) writes:
>
>It would appear I've gotten into this a bit late, but here some more...
>Note:  a lot of my additions are 'older' guys, in case you're wondering
>who the heck they are...IMHO, these guys 'rate' the list (most, if not
>all are Hall of Famers.
>
>>  >>> 1. Warren Moon
>o         Ray Flaherty
>>  >>> 2. Doug Flutie
>>  >>> 3. Daryl Lamonica/Bobby Hebert
>o         Bronco Naguski
No questions here for #3--Jan Stenerud

>>  >>> 4. Brett Favre 
There's got to be a HOF'er that wore this number, but I just can't think of one.

>>  >>> 5. Paul Hornung
>o         George McAfee
>>  >>> 6. 
>>  >>>>7. John Elway
>>  >>     Joe Theismann
>o         Bob Waterfield
>>  >>> 8. Archie Manning
>o         Larry Wilson
>>  >>  9. Jim McMahon
>>  >
>>  >Sonny Jurgenson
>>  >
>>  >>> 10. Fran Tarkenton
>>  >>> 11. Phil Sims
>>  >>> 12. Terry Bradshaw/Roger Staubach/Ken Stabler
>>  >>      (/Bob Griese/Jim Kelly)
>>  >>      (too many famous #12s to list just one... just wait till we do 32/34!)
>o          Joe Namath
>o          John Brodie
>>  >>>>13. Dan Marino
>o          Don Maynard
>>  >>> 14. Y.A. Tittle
>o          Dan Fouts 
>o          Otto Graham
>o          Don Hutson          
>>  >>> 15. Bart Starr
>o          Steve Van Buren
>>  >>>>16. Joe Montana
>o          Len Dawson
Add Jim Plunkett to this list.

>>  >>> 17. Don Meredith
>>  >>      Harold Carmichael (so he was a WR)
>>  >>> 18. Roman Gabriel
>>  >>> 19. Johnny Unitas
>o      20. Gino Cappelletti
>> 
>> 33 Tony Dorsett
>> 56 LT
>> 22 Bob Hayes  (for me anyway)
>
>As it would appear this is as far as the list goes, I stop here...
>
>Mike Colburn                         =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Dartmouth-Hitchcock                  "Pulu-see-ba-goomba" -- Gilligan 
>Medical Center                       =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Lebanon, New Hampshire  03756        :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)

Joel Alvstad

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Re: Packer Plus
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Distribution: na
Date: 28 JAN 93 12:07:37    

In article <1k6virINNfgs@ector.cs.purdue.edu>, atmadja@cs.purdue.edu (Hery Atmadja) writes...

>Dear Packers fans:
> 
>	Can anyone of you tell how to get 'Packer Plus' subscription?

Call 1-800-846-PACK

or write:

Packer Plus/Milwaukee Sentinel
P.O. Box 2970
Milwaukee, WI 53201-2970

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gil@dipl.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com(Baldemar Gil)
Subject: Mike Saxon punting poorly 
Keywords: Super Bowl, Cowboys
Reply-To: gil@dipl.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 16:54:45 GMT

Mike Saxon has been punting very poorly recently (short punts,
no hang time).  Anybody know why?

-Baldemar Gil  (Lockheed Artificial Intelligence Center)
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Miami: AFC pretender? Boy are you Stupid!
Date: 26 Jan 93 14:14:15 GMT
Organization: VMARK Software, Inc.

In article <C1F7Cs.4t9@acsu.buffalo.edu> v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:
>
>Now this all makes sense to me that there are no other teams in
>the league besides Miami.  How in the world can you rate Dan
>Marino above Young or Kelly?  How can you say that Miami's

Marino??  More yardage and touchdowns, fewer interceptions???

>offensive line is better than Buffalo's.  The Bills are the
>number one rushing team in NFL and 3 rd in passing in AFC.
>And of course Don Shula is a better coach than Marv Levy,
>after all the Bills since Levy came here, have only dominated
>Miami for the last five years.  Emmit Smith better than Thurman
>Thomas, I don't think so, Emmit was never MVP of the league.

Was he THIS year's MVP???  Old news buddy.  I won't get into which is
better, but using this as your criteria is pretty weak.  

>>Coach:  Again, no question.  Shula has worked miracles this year.  SF
>>and Dallas and Buffalo were all expected to make it this far.  Miami
>>was not.  Besides, I think that Levy is a terrible coach.
>>
>And I suppose that Miami has won more games over the last five
>years than Buffalo.  Wrong!  Only the 49 ers have.  You don't
>sound intelligent if speak emotionally rather than factually.

You also speak emotionally instead of intelligently.   The Bills have won
more games over the past 5 years.  But, couple of questions...
First, who has won more SuperBowls???   Not Levy 
Who has more overall victories in his career???  Not Levy
Whose team won their division this year???  Not Levy's...


>>I think that Miami would give whoever makes it to the SB from the NFC
>>a good run for their money.  I also think that if Miami plays the way
>>they did in Buffalo earlier this season, they might actually win.
>>Fortunately, that's not very likely.  8-)

Well, I think if Miami played well, they have a chance.  Miami's biggest
problem this year was inconsistency.  When they were on, they were on of the
league's premier teams.  However, when they weren't they were average...
In the first Buffalo/Miami game, we saw how good Miami could be.  In the
second game, we saw both Miami teams.  And, in the third, we say the 
average one...  In the San Diego game, we saw the better Miami team...
To be a SB champ, you need more consistency, and they just didn't have it 
this year...
-- 
David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
From: kehuang@acsu.buffalo.edu (Ke Huang)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Bills 30 Cowboys 13
Date: 27 Jan 93 19:36:52 GMT
Organization: UB


The Bills have not lost a single game as underdogs, thus I believe the
inner strength is a major factor. 
I predict:

------First Quarter------
Bills 0 Cowboys 0
Bills 7 Cowboys 0
Bills 7 Cowboys 3
Bills 14 Cowboys 3
------Second Quarter------
Bills 17 Cowboys 3
Bills 24 Cowboys 3
------Third Quarter------
Bills 24 Cowboys 10
Bills 24 Cowboys 13
Bills 27 Cowboys 13
------Fourth Quarter------
Bills 30 Cowboys 13
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: johndoe@sampson.inmet (johndoe)
Subject: Re: Mike Saxon punting poorly
Reply-To: johndoe@inmet.com (Bus error - core dumped)
Organization: Intermetrics, Inc.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:22:49 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.165445.3111@butch.lmsc.lockheed.com> gil@dipl.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Baldemar Gil) writes:

   Mike Saxon has been punting very poorly recently (short punts,
   no hang time).  Anybody know why?

   -Baldemar Gil  (Lockheed Artificial Intelligence Center)

don't know why he's punting poorly.  he did seem to get one good punt off
against the 49ers, though the others were indeed low and short.

hopefully, he won't have to do much punting against the bills.

-johndoe
From: GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullys Maze)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Semi-Tough, (Was Re: Halftime Ex
Date: 22 Jan 1993 10:32:03 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

Regarding the silliness of the SB halftime (and pregame) shows:

Re-read Dan Jenkins' old standby:  Semi-Tough.  Talk about life
imitating art!  The ridiculousness of his halftime show parodies
is surpassed only by the real thing.

The 3D thing a few years ago was the topper.

Re-read Jenkins and it will put a different spin on the silliness of
it all and you may find yourself giggling at it like I do.

Mike
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Skywalker)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills 23 Cowboys 20
Date: 22 Jan 1993 19:25:09 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <1993Jan20.100822.20581@spuddy.uucp> markl@spuddy.uucp (Mark Liversedge) writes:

 >
 >WHY is Dallas a better TEAM? 
 >To say NFC has won it most in last 10 and so they will win this year is
 >absolutely ludicrous. Will we get, NFC won has won it every year for the
 >last 10 years (except for last years fluke)... next year?

Dallas  plays in the NFC East, thats where you have to play SB type football
in almost every game of the year to have a good season. If you play all
year with the best and beat them, then you are the best......

Unlike "some" divisions in the AFC, Okay all of the AFC.

Go Cowboys!!!!!
tim


"You can either proffit from this or be destroyed, it's your choice"
                                             -Luke Skywalker
From: caeser@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Robert Michael Trotter)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Wanted/Predictions
Date: 27 Jan 93 17:06:35 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1993Jan27.022544.20378@oracle.us.oracle.com> alaw@oracle.com writes:
>mg5c+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael D. Goettsche) writes:
>>just a
>>score.  Thanks.
>>
>>Dallas 27
>>Buffalo 17
>
>Dallas   44
>Buffalo  14
	
	Well, Im a NFC fan, Vikings actually, but Im going to say:

	Buffalo 21
	Dallas  14

	Mark
	GO VIKINGS! in 93-94


-- 
Minnesota Vikings	11-5	NFC Central Division Champions 1992-93!

Salisbury back in the pocket,DRAW to Allen,Allen bursts up the middle,TOUCHDOWN!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dorsett@baloo.geg.mot.com (Jim Dorsett x2488)
Subject: Re: 9er Fans are Spoiled!!!
Organization: Motorola GEG
Date: 21 Jan 93 08:18:16

>gone either way, the Cards, who were just plain lucky and Dallas the
>only team
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I was at the game and the Cardinals played exceptional, luck had
nothing to do with it.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: fbrown@ssd.kodak.com (Frank Brown)
Subject: Re: Dallas/Buffalo
Organization: Eastman Kodak
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 21:04:10 GMT

In article <595N03Ajc9U500@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend) writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.154634.11052@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Imran Qureshi) writes:
>>In <wfLUwRK00aw3AAN0hs@andrew.cmu.edu> mg5c+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael D. Goettsche) writes:
>>
>>>QB -  Edge to Buffalo?  Jim Kelly has been too erratic the past two
>>>years to really know what type of game he will have.  If he's on, Dallas
>>>will have some problems, BUT they won't be in trouble.  Aikman has not
>>>had a bad game since the first Philadelphia loss in week 4 of the season
>>>-- he has not turned the ball over and directed the offense with great
>>>poise.  When Aikman is on, he is every much if not more than the equal
>>>of Kelly.  Edge to Dallas (slight).
>>
>>Aikman over Kelly?!?!?!?
>
>>
>>You've got to be kidding.  First of all, please note that Kelly completed
>>17 of his 24 passes.  No imcompletions in the second half.  His two INT's
>>were clear effects of his rustiness (one pass was short by 18 inches and
>>the other was a miscommunication with the reciver).  If Kelly is on, he'll
>>kill Dallas and open up holes for Thurman to blow by in...which will open
>>up the pass and it will feed on itself.  The Bills don't have a powerhouse
>>offense for no reason!
>
If he doesnt start throwing some of those INTs he's so famous for.

>Hmmm... Aikman finished the year with higher rating did he not? He has played 
>better in the playoffs (okay Kelly only played one game but Aikman was clearly
>better on Sunday).. Why does the concept that MAYBE Aikman has matured into 
>the QB everyone thought he would now in his fourth year bother you so much? 
>
>Seems to me that powerhouse offense doesn't need Kelly judging from the first 
>two playoff games. 
>
Reicht!

>
>>>OL - Even.  Buffalo has an outstanding OL, naming several players to the
>>>Pro Bowl over the last few seasons.  Dallas' OL RIGHT NOW is just as
>>>good, having 2 PB players, and in many people's opinions another couple.
>>> Dallas' OL dominates opposing DLs in the second half through their
>>>size, whereas Buffalo plays an even keel game throughout.
>>
>>NOT!!!!!
>>The Bills clearly have the best line in the NFL!!! What's more is that they
>>are playint their best bal of the year! Huge edge to Buffalo!!!
>
>What? What games have you been watching.? Only a major el foldo by Houston 
>got Buffalo this chance. The Oiler D-line ate Buffalo for breakfast. In the 
>next two games they had the luxury of playing against two of the weaker 
>defenses in the league (among playoof teams).. That will not be the case next
>week. 

They might have ate them for breakfast in the first half but they got their
hats handed to them in the second. I dont think they touched Reich after the
interception. I think that 32 pt comeback showed that the Bills are a team
of destiny. They cant lose!

Frank
>
>
>


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jdm42241@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Doug Mraz)
Subject: Re: Reggie White ?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 00:44:11 GMT

 ESPN reported on SportsCenter tonight that Cleveland is expected to
 make a pitch for Reggie White. Owner Art Modell may be shelling out some
 big bucks this football off-season.

-- 
Here come the Hawks, the mighty Blackhawks! Repeat-a-Bulls 
"The power to tax involves the power to destroy." John Marshall.
"People who live in the past are cowards." Mike Ditka.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sterbenc@ivhs.mot.com (Joe Sterbenc)
Subject: Re: RIGGIE WHITE close to signing with Washing
Organization: MOTOROLA 
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:08:47 GMT
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro

In article <1jpb91INN75m@seven-up.East.Sun.COM>, bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM
(Bennet Ih - Sun BOS Hardware) wrote:
> 
> In article 5400@nlm.nih.gov, news@nlm.nih.gov () writes:
> >
> >In an recent interview reggie white said that he is 
> >talking with washington very seriously. Also he
> >mentioned that since washington is so close to
> >philadelphia that he and his family will not have
> >to go through major changes.....
> 
> How does the "Franchise player" clause in the new NFL labor agreement
> come into play here? I can't imagine Philly letting Reggie White go, 
> especially to another NFC East team. 

It doesn't come into play. The plaintiffs in the "restriction of
trade" lawsuits are by decree excempt from ANY restrictions. Reggie
was one of the plaintiffs; hence he can go wherever he wants. I 
believe, however, that plaintiffs would still count towards the
"playoff team limit" of free agents.

=====
Joe Sterbenc - Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems - Motorola
All opinions are my own, but can be rented for reasonable rates
sterbenc@ivhs.mot.com
=====