HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Define "FEMININE" anything goes...
Date: 29 Jul 92 01:28:01 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

In article <1992Jul28.144638.19290@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>Feminine means skimpy silk undies underneath blue jeans
 
In article <1992Jul28.172215.23207@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>Is it wrong for a man .....
>Hold it. Could you go into a little more detail?

In article <1992Jul28.192015.25687@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>Black

Zebra striped, while we're on the subject. :)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: moody@brahms.udel.edu (John David Moody)
Subject: Comment on men's hair length
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 06:06:46 GMT

It seems like an interesting debate, so I might as well add my 1/50 dollar
worth.

Several girls I talked to back in college (and women) have said that the
hair length with they liked best on men depended on the man's build.

In general most of the women felt that long hair looked better on tall men
with slender builds while these women felt that short hair looked better
on men who were stockier and more muscular.

When I say "looked better" I mean that these women found the various hair
lengths "more attractive" and would be more likely to go out with a tall,
long-haired man or a stockier, short-haired man, than with a tall, short-
haired man or a stockier, long haired man.

I'm curious to see what women think.  I'm just curious.

 --  John David Moody
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius)
Subject: Re: East Side, West Side  The Boink is coming to Town ...
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 18:42:24 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez
Distribution: na
Keywords: Fun Fun <subliminal message about .... here> Fun Fun

In article <1992Jul24.154705.2693@newstand.syr.edu> haroome@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Allisson Roome) writes:
>
>It happens every year - August -- the time when summer gets put back
>in the closet and the words "back-to-school" are writ large on
>advertising promotions and wool sweater displays.  Don't let summer
>end with a whimper, end it with a bang -- have fun and come to THE
>BOINK WITH NO NAME.  We promise something for everyone (if we haven't
>thought of it we'll create it) - argue about arguing with Charlie
>Martin, see if Trygve shows up in chain mail (He hasn't quite said yes
>yet so twist his arm), find out what Larry Margolis is like in person,
>meet the effervescent Piglet, see what Allisson looks like in a black
>halter-top miniskirt dress (can I remember to bend properly?), and
>much more ....

Don't you mean, "...and much, much less...."?
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Babbage's Birthday Bargain Bash -- December 26th, 1992
Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.bizarre
From: cocoa@iat.holonet.net (Elise - little 'e')
Subject: Re: Neccesary and sufficient conditions
Organization: The Chocolate Factory
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 04:24:59 GMT

drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
: ok, but the Pressing Question is:
: 
: Is an Orgasm a Neccesary or Sufficient Condition to Sex,
: and is there an Objectively Verifiable Method of Analysis
: that contains its own means of Falsification?
 
The only pressing question is whether geography, time and energy permit
the pressing desired, to the extent which it is desired.  Ergo, the only
necessary and sufficient condition to sex is desire (IMO, my desire).
 
: ciao
: drieux
: 
: 
: ObPeeve: Once upon a time sex was a Lot simpler, and now
: its become such an intellectually stressing matter.

: ObExample: Washing machines say "pull out to start, push in to stop."
  (OhSoIntellectuallyStressing!)

: ObSex: not tonight, I have to post.
: 
: ObSingle: Not tonight I have to have sex.
 
ObPeavy: How can I hook up my guitar, my amp, and my portable recorder all
at the same time?
 
ObSex1: Yes!
 
ObSex2: Now!
 
: -- 
: I Do Not Believe in .sig files
: as they are such a Known Waste Of BandWidth,
: And Therefore Not a Morally UpRight Choice.
: But I Can See the HideousHienousHandOfHeteroSexualityBehindItAll.
(especially in mine) :)

Just me,

little 'e'
 
- -
(also know by one to be a):
[The] lateNightEarlyMorningNewsLustCrazedGuitarJammerOf
ConsiderableThoughtAndDimensionWithLittleBluesInHerEarsAndQuick
BrownEyesWho <pant> PostsExpertly(InBed)AndMustBeWonderingHowLong
ThisGermanVirusWillInfectTheSpeaking/TypingFingersOfAFingerPicker
QuiteTakenWithHiSpanishNow,NotGerman,ButNotTOOMuchAlso <pant> SinceWeAre
AllConsciousOfPersonalSpace(AndPersonalTime)DespiteTheUrgeToFold
IntoEachOthers'ArmsForLongRelaxingMoltenMoments.

-- 
Recently re-located, and now permanently residing at _The_Chocolate_Factory_
*  *   e-mail: cocoa@iat.holonet.net    -     voicemail: 415-337-4940   *  *
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing)
Subject: Re: Net.Women
Keywords: good looking cute beautiful etc.
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 15:21:35 GMT

In article <1_nmyzl.catcher@netcom.com> catcher@netcom.com (Paul W. Francisco) writes:
>In article <1992Jul28.193425.13239@med.umich.edu> blackp@med.umich.edu (Jeremy Thomas James) writes:
>>I friend of mine and are are having a dispute as to whether there
>>are actually any good looking net.women that read this news group.
>
>Whoever says there are is right.

And Paul goes on with a quite sensible response.....But hey Paul, Jeremy
is NOT interested in a male's response.  He asks...

>>Any suggestions as to how this dispute could be settled?

And what he WANTS is for some babelette to email him, saying that well,
*she's* good looking, but she can't find any decent guys out there! 
That's what he wants.  Doubt if he'll get it though.  He's just getting a
few nice flames and then some sweetie-pies like you trying to be logical.  

Angelwing - teetering on the edge of sanity.

*------------------------------------------------------------------*
* Angelwing       |  "And just where do you think you're going     *
* U. of Washington|   dressed like *that*?                         *
*                 |                            -  My Dad           *
*------------------------------------------------------------------*
From: hanners@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Robert Hanners)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Breast Puns
Date: 22 Jul 92 16:53:36 GMT
Reply-To: hanners@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Robert Hanners)
Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD

In soc.singles, the legions write:
>>>
>>>Thank you for making a clean breast of it.
>>>Another thread of puns?  I bet we can return you tit for tat.
>>
>>Ah, a thread like this is sure to bring back some great mammaries.
>
>Let's milk it for all it's worth!!!
>
Would've thought the udder thread would wean you of this.
	.
	 .
	  .
	   .
	    .
	     .
	      .
	       .
		 --- Bob
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: arevalo@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Subject: Re: Those looooong and hard love sessions (was: Re: She called, I came, she smiled, I slept)
Reply-To: arevalo@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 08:20:15 GMT

>         [munch....munch...munch...burp!!]
>
>         What's the longest you've ever spent (or ever wanted to spend)
>         making love with someone?
>
>         Hmmmm...The longest was 6.5 hours....We were both sore for
>         days....But it was worth it. It showed me my limit.

just me....billy
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:42:32 GMT

In article <1992Jul27.222523.28895@zooid.guild.org> ross@zooid.guild.org (Ross Ridge) writes:
>
>This is isn't the States, but interestlingly enough in Ontario the age of
>consent is 14.  I don't know if this make it legal for anybody to "Shag"
>this hypothetical 14 year, as a man over the age of 21 seducing a girl
>under the age of 21 is illegal(*).  In fact you can be sued for damages
>by the girls father.  There may very well be similar laws in New Zealand.  
>

	Uh, oh.

			James 'One more month of breaking the law' Nicoll

Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.couples
From: intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing)
Subject: Re: 2 More Inches, please
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 23:12:54 GMT

In article <1992Jul21.154020.1358@lub001.lamar.edu> lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu writes:

>Most guys would keep thier women better satisfied if they had 2 more inches.
>'Course I am *NOT* speaking for myself!

Oh no .. of course not.  You sound like you're the type of guy who needs
at least 5 more inches.  Does the phrase "Is it in yet?" ring a bell?

Angelwing - People who don't edit articles really piss me off.

*------------------------------------------------------------------*
* Angelwing       |  "And just where do you think you're going     *
* U. of Washington|   dressed like *that*?                         *
*                 |                            -  My Dad           *
*------------------------------------------------------------------*



Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jdavidso@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu (Jeff Davidson)
Subject: Re: MOOOOOOORE BLONDE JOKES!
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 17:26:49 GMT

Distribution: world

In article <1992Jul23.160901.10720@wpi.WPI.EDU> terrylee@wpi.WPI.EDU (The  
Cookie Goddess) writes:
*I told you not to post the blonde jokes!!!!
*
*You asked for it....the dumb-men jokes!!
*
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA    I like it. Got any more?
--
************************************************************************
 the Lost Cause                       jdavidso@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
(hardwaire guy extraordinaire)       MACTech,NeXTtech; NeXTmail accepted
                      "Everything is relative."
************************************************************************
From: Auspex.COM!johnf@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Testosterone is Your Friend
Date: 23 Jul 92 03:15:00 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

>In article <1992Jul22.204247.7977@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> 
nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>>In article <1992Jul22.154022.20609@u.washington.edu> 
intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
>>
>>>Angelwing - How do I get my testosterone level checked?
>
>Actually Ang, I think you need to drop off a semen sample.  I wonder if
>testosterone blood levels increase upon ingestion?  Heh.

Time for a joke...

A man and a woman got in an elevator at the same time and the man asked the
women which floor she wanted.  "Second floor", she said, "they're paying $25
a  pint at the blood bank".  The man replied, "I'm going to the fourth. They
pay $200 an ounce at the sperm bank."  A week later the man and woman both 
got
on the same elevator.  The man, recognizing the woman asked, "second floor?".
With her mouth closed and her cheeks puffed out she just shook her head and 
held
up four fingers.

-- 

+============================================================================
++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                
|
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           
|

+============================================================================
++
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blackp@med.umich.edu (Jeremy Thomas James)
Subject: Re: long hair
Originator: blackp@hendrix.itn.med.umich.edu
Organization: University of Michigan - Medical Center
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 22:07:29 GMT


In article <154e7oINNsa3@rodan.UU.NET>, evie@rodan.UU.NET (Evie Allen) writes:
|> So tell me, which do you prefer...long hair or short skirts? Or both?
|> Whenever I get frustrated because my hair is in the way, The typical
|> male response it that if I cut it off, noone will notice me as much
|> with short hair rather than long.  I would think that guys would get
|> tired of getting smacked in the face with it. ; ).  Maybe you can
|> tell me exactly what it is that attracts you to long hair so much! 
|> 

Long hair is just one of those things that certain people either like or
dislike.  Just like some people prefer blondes rather than brunettes or 
red heads.  Or tall rather than short.  Or skinny as opposed to large.
Or athletic, tan, etc.

Then again, some people like long hair because they like to brush it or just
run their fingers through (While kissing or otherwise).
-- 
What I say isn't necessarily the opinion of the organization I belong to!
===============================================================================
Jeremy T. James         University of Michigan Medical Center,  ITN 
B1911 CFOB, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0704 Phone:313-747-2778  blackp@med.umich.edu
"Even if your on the right track, you'll get run over if you're there too long"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: topless
Distribution: world
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 07:02:15 GMT
Organization: GRW Enterprises

jemenake@zeus.calpoly.edu writes:
> Personally, I'd love women to walk around topless. How about totally nude
> even? In fact...   damn! Where'd I put those stirrups? :-)

If you spent less time looking at pictures and spent more time around real
nude or partially nude women you would know that you would get used to them
and stop associating nudity with sex and start associating nudity with what
it really should stand for : wearing less clothing when it's too warm.

	fred
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: A short metaphor for love
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 17:20:18 GMT

In article <l7bdquINN92v@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>I asked the baby for a kiss and she whapped me in the face with a block.

Awwww, how cute--she's learning fast, isn't she? 
Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.bizarre
From: osa@kepler.unh.edu (Bart Simps.. er.. Oktay Ahiska)
Subject: Re: I just saved you 3 bucks.
X-Advertisement: Use Emacs
Organization: University of New Hampshire, Durham NH
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 07:44:08 GMT
Comments: Hire a freak today!


"Andy" == The Wolf <pa_andy@merrimack.edu> writes:

Andy> I was in the humor section of a book store this week.  I noticed a book titled
Andy> _Everything Men Know About Women_.  All of the pages were blank.
Andy> -- 
Andy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy> Andy Harrington                      | AHARRINGTON@LDBVAX.lotus.com
Andy> Computer Geek                        | There's a certain freedom in being
Andy> Lotus Development Corp.              | completely screwed.
Andy> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

this is one of the best sigs i've seen so far. and my favorite post of
the day. i mean it!



--
oktay ahiska, dept. of cs, unh, durham nh, 03824 
the opinions expressed above are solely my own. i don't represent unh. 
and here's the last five. it's educational. it's educational. 
it's educational.  it's educational. it's educational.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max)
Subject: Re: She called, I came, she smiled, I slept
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 15:35:14 GMT

In article <ewillims.711804552@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:

>
>	Marianna dear, I think you'll find that I said nothing at all about 
>not wishing to do exactly the same for my lover! However, on re-reading my
>post, I see that I should have said "May I please nominate this as the
> motto for all subscribers to soc.singles?"
>Replace Mark's words "the MAN'S only role" with "the Lover's only role"...
>

Adequate save Emma

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Why are Women *SO* Vain ??
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 21:25:44 GMT

In article <711874447snx@walter.UUCP> fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter) writes:
>terra@reed.edu writes:
>> if he can tolerate the way I look dripping wet after
>> a shower, then we're meant for each other.
>
>I don't think this is a good test ... what if he's nearsighted and doesn't
>have his glasses on ? (When I shower with someone I don't wear my glasses - do
>other people take their glasses off too ?)

Though I usually wear contacts (which I can wear in the shower), I have 
approximately 4/400 vision (or slightly worse) which means I have an
effective visual range of about two inches.  Nonetheless, I'm still 
quite capable of seeing exactly what someone looks like dripping wet 
in the shower, it just takes quite a bit longer for a complete survey.

Trygve   (Of course I'd be surprised if anyone would object to a dripping
          wet Terra.)
From: lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Toe Jobs???  It *MUST* be getting late!
Date: 27 Jul 92 23:51:33 +1700
Organization: Lamar University - Beaumont

Just wondering....

How do people (you guys and gals) feel about toe jobs?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNET:LAIRDPG@LUB001.LAMA.EDU              |         PRACTICE SAFE HEX -
these are my views and not my employers views |     USE A WRITE PROTECT TAB!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Best unconventional use of a TV set
Date: 22 Jul 92 18:30:23 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Jul22.084052.23600@news.cs.brandeis.edu> arevalo@binah.cc.brandeis.edu writes:
|>
|>Using a TV with external inputs as a keyboard amplifier.
|>
|>(I really wanted to play with the new toy, and I do have stereo
|> sound and a remote control this way :-)
|>
|>Rob T
|>--
|
|
|>> How 'bout having tremdously good sex on a console tv??
|>>
|>> just me...billy

No, thank you, but I'm flattered that you asked.

Let me also take this opportunity to make a comment on your posting style.
See, your news posting software puts a little ">" character in front of each
line of the article that you are responding to.  When you put the same
character in front of your response it makes it real difficult to tell which
is the original article and which is the response.

And watch those ellipses in soc.singles...

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 17:59:28 GMT

In article <Bs3v5H.6pF@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca> jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll) writes:
>>>consent is 14.  I don't know if this make it legal for anybody to "Shag"
>>>this hypothetical 14 year, as a man over the age of 21 seducing a girl
>>>under the age of 21 is illegal(*).  In fact you can be sued for damages
>>>by the girls father.  There may very well be similar laws in New Zealand.  
>>>
>>
>>	Uh, oh.
>>
>
>	Clarification, so that I don't get added to the Claytoon Cramer
>list of 'people who do it iwth children': I was refering to the bit about
>21 year olds, not 14.
>
>								James Nicoll
 
Sure James. Anything you say. No one doubts your sincerity.
Will James and his niece be attending the east coast boink where
men will be treated like cheap pieces of meat, fawned over, drooled on
and discarded like yesterdays news? The horror. The degradation.

 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Long hair
Date: 30 Jul 92 05:10:18 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

graydon@micor.ocunix.on.ca (Graydon) writes:

>stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:

>> I'm more interested in how long a guy's body hair would be if it were all 
>> placed end-to-end. 
>> 
>Is this curiousity like-so because you want to attempt this 
>particular experiment, or an extremely elipitcal reference to
>a quantity preference?

The latter. 

--
Stef                 After many years of study, scientists have determined  
stef@apple.com       that dogs bark "just for the hell of it." -- Smithsonian
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: topless
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 20:09:32 GMT

In article <1992Jul23.102413.2201@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
>stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>>Personally, I think it should be illegal for men to take off their shirts*.
>>It's quite distracting for some of us.
>And for the men involved as well.  Personally, whenever I remove
>my shirt, the women around me tend to go into a frenzy and begin
>chanting "put it on!".  :-)

Personally, I think breasts are neat, both sexes.  I vote we keep
them legal.

-Nance (.)(.)

-- 
Nance Colucci  *^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*  | Discussions welcomed. 
att!ihlpk!colucci                               | Trollers discouraged.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: irene@leland.Stanford.EDU (Irene M. Dris)
Subject: Re: long hair
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 07:48:15 GMT

I think long hair can be very attractive on a man, as long
as it is well kept....none of this shaggy, stringy unkept stuff.
If kept kept clean and taken care of long hair on a man is
very sexy (much nicer than very very short hair).

i.m.d
From: memstvx1.memst.edu!mcsweinberg@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: long hair
Date: 22 Jul 92 20:27:00 GMT
Organization: Memphis State University
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

>>
>>I'm one who has recently given in to the temptation to have long hair
>>again -it hasn't been what I'd consider "long" since high school.  Only
>>recently is it getting to where I can French braid and do other fun and
>>different things with it.
..........................................................................
>>
Hi, I'm not sure if I'm jumping in here on a serious discussion or what
but In my personal preference (not that any of you would care) but I have
this rule about guys with hair longer than mine I don't date them. Hey
so I'm stuck in stereotypes of guys short hair women long hair... Or maybe
I just know what I like. For those of you who don't read alt.personals
don't ask me who I am.


Rai.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damn I wish I was your lover                       Raina Weinberg
I'll rock you till the daylight comes         Memphis State University
Make sure you are smiling and warm                Memphis, Tennesee
I am everything                            MCSWEINBERG@MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU
Tonight I'll be your mother I will
Do such thines to ease your pain

                                       
Newsgroups: soc.singles