HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mascot@bnr.ca (Scott Mason)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: 4000
Date: 25 Sep 92 23:21:56 GMT
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

In article <x52nanc.fletcher@netcom.com> fletcher@netcom.com (F. Sullivan Segal) writes:
>
>I've always felt that an eight bit exponential DAC would give much
>better output than a 16 bit linear DAC.

Unfortunately, no. The mu-law and A-law codes used in telephony
(specific exponential codes) give 14 and 13 bits of dynamic range from
an 8 bit word. Distortion levels run about -40dB (7 bits). Exponential
coding is used because one never knows what level a customer will be
transmitting, but the actual signal information does not require a
large dynamic range. Linear coding is required for low distortion
levels.

------------------------------------------------------------
#include <disclaimer.h>              Bell-Northern Research
Scott Mason                          P.O. Box 3511 Station C
Internet: mascot@bnr.ca              Ottawa, Canada, K1Y 4H7
From: roger.bouchard@canrem.com (roger bouchard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: spirit in1000 clock
Date: 3 Oct 92 15:35:19 GMT
Reply-To: "roger bouchard" <roger.bouchard@canrem.com>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Canada Remote Systems

PJ>I've got an Amiga 1000 at home (as opposed to here at school, where I've
PJ>my A2000) with a Spirit IN1000 1.5MB internal memory expander.  Recently
PJ>clock has been acting strangely...  When it's read (using the Spirit uti
PJ>or the "SetClock" replacement from the Fish disks), it's a day off.  I'v
PJ>set it, then read it again immediately, and it's still a day off.
PJ>
PJ>My temporary fix is to set it one day ahead, so that it sets the 1000's 
PJ>correctly.  But it's a strange problem...  Did Spirit go and do somethin
PJ>not take leap years into account?
PJ>
PJ>Has anyone else had this problem?  (I know there are still A1000 users o
PJ>there 8)  Does anyone have a permanent solution?
PJ>

I have !

I only noticed it after i upgraded to 2.0 but don't know if it's related .

in my case though , when you do a getclock on the spirit , it gives out the
RIGHT date , but when you do a DATE to get the system clock , it's a day
late .

my solution was the samem as yours . so when i boot , i get a message from
getclock that the date is 1 day ahead then the date command tells me the day
 is ok .



---
 * Amiga-Reader V2.00 * the best IBM accelerator : 9.8 m / s^2
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: alexr@capella.EETECH.McGill.CA (Alex Rousseau)
Subject: Re: FALCON VS AMIGA
Keywords: n
Organization: McGill University - Montreal, CANADA.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 16:46:03 GMT


Makes me wonder... Is this guy for real ? I cannot help but think that
it is possible that this guy never has laid his hands on an Atari and is
only annoying people and enticing them to redirect their anger at Atari.
If I were an Atari fan, I would doubt that such behaviour would help sales
of my adopted platform. Therefore, RETURN TO YOUR MS-DOS WORLD, DEMON...
(fizzzzz...)

There, that should do it.

Alex.
From: swinokur@cellar.org (Steve Winokur)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Re: A4000/Alice
Date: 30 Sep 92 03:54:59 GMT
Organization: The Cellar BBS and public access system

dmacphee@nyx.cs.du.edu (Don mac phee) writes:

> A1000 : We will recycle your machine for free. $2699 for A4000.
Grrrr...... 8*).  

Y'know I wouldn't be at all suprised if some maniac
somewherez hacks his 1000 to AGA.  (Phoenix type board? -- yeah yeah,
they're SM Chips, but hey ....)



.............................................................................
          tredysvr!cellar!swinokur -or- swinokur@cellar.uucp -or-
                          GEnie: S.WINOKUR  -or-
                  435 Norristown Road, Horsham PA, 19044
..................... Amiga: Hey, at least it works! ........................
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: 22black@sol.cs.wmich.edu (Martin E. Black)
Subject: Re: A4000 or Zeus???
Keywords: A4000,Zeus,PP&S
Organization: Western Michigan Univ. Comp. Sci. Dept.
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 02:27:06 GMT

sh@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Stephen Harvey) writes:

>	At the moment I have a PP&S `040 board and was intending to upgrade to
>a 33Mhz Zeus, then the A4000 turns up...
>	What do all you gurus suggest - Should I wait for the A4000 or go for
>the Zeus??? What ARE the real A4000 specs?? I certainly can`t decide
>until I find out what the options are. Upgrading to a Zeus will cost me
>$1400 trading in my current board. How much will it cost to get an A4000?

You are going to spend $1400 for a 30% speed increase.  Wow aren't you 
demanding.  I didn't even spend an extra $800 to get an 040 instead of my
030 25mhz.

But to your question would you need an a4000.  Well it is only 25mhz right now.
And since you already have that....


Marty
From: wipeout+@CMU.EDU (Sean Michael Goller)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: HD 3.5" for AMIGA questions
Date: 29 Sep 92 13:09:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.YemAMFO00XQD4BB1sM
Organization: Senior, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Ok, I'm relatively new (Amiga is 3 weeks old, about) so I have a few questions:

1) Can the Amiga support HD 3.5" floppies with 1.3 ROMS?

2) Is it possible to take a HD 3.5" flop drive from another computer and
make it work with an Amiga?

please email responses to
wipeout+@cmu.edu

will summarize and post responses.

Thanks!

Sean.
From: daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Concern (Not flames) over IDE for A4000
Date: 5 Oct 92 18:27:58 GMT
Reply-To: daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA

In article <tdenbo.718034549@guru> tdenbo@dwp.la.ca.us (Tom Denbo) writes:
>Davie Haynie!  

Dave Haynie	- Amiga Hardware Guy
Davie Jones	- Monkee (or was it Davey?)

Know the difference!

>The CBM marketing guys were blaming the lack of SCSI on the A4000 on
>engineering at WOC in Pasadena.  I don't beleive them since this type of
>decision is usually done by marketing.  Care to comment?

I gather that, when presented with completed IDE, the Marketing folks
would rather have had SCSI.  The decision to go with IDE was made by
Engineering Management, specifically Bill Sydnes, former VP of
Engineering.  Marketing could honestly blame it on Engineering, though
not on the Engineers involved in building the A4000.  These kinds of
things, in so far as they effect Marketing, should be Marketing
decisions (eg, if some interface decision doesn't matter to Marketing,
it should be left to Engineering). 

-- 
Dave Haynie Commodore-Amiga (Cool Advanced High-End Systems You Can't See Yet)
 "The Crew That Never Rests"  {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!daveh   BIX: hazy
              "I got a pocket full of kryptonite" -Spin Doctors
From: pvdh@motship.hacktic.nl (Paul van der Heu)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Attaching SCSI devices to A2091
Keywords: 2091 , ROM
Date: 1 Oct 92 20:57:20 MET
Reply-To: pvdh@motship.hacktic.nl
Distribution: world
Organization: The MotherShip Connection
X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00 beta rel2

In article <1992Sep30.173531.5224@city.cs>, Lionel Tun writes:

> Results:
> Everything almost works. I can access the Fujitsu by reading and
> writing to it from memory, or from and to itself.  However, when I try
> copying from the Quantum to the Fujitsu - both drives hang up after a
> few seconds. Inspection after rebooting shows that a few files have

You most likely have rev 6.1 or lower EPROMS on your 2091. get the 6.6
EPROMS ..
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: svanegmo@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu (Stephen Van Egmond)
Subject: A500/2.04 Problems?
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 15:31:48 GMT

Hello everyone.  I seem to be encountering a few diffiulties all of a
sudden from my A500.  It's got a GVP sitting hanging off the side with
a 52 quantum, 2 megs of RAM, and a somewhat rickety C= A501 on the inside
(the clock appears to have died, but it's been like that for some time).

I've been running a (legally obtained, if you're wondering) kickstart file
for 2.04 for many months now.  Just last night, it refuses to kick over
from 1.3 to 2.04.   The kick program loads fine, & all the debug information
checks out.   After the 5-second wait for reboot, the screen colors, CAPS
light and power indicator go through the necessary gyrations, but the
computer wakes up in 1.3.   It seems all of a sudden that the ROMTags
aren't holding, and I can find no good explanation for it software-wise,
so I might as well go looking for help hardware-wise.  It's a long, long
way from here to an Amiga dealer with a good reputation, so any help
or ventures as to what might be the cause would be appreciated.

Public or private responses are fine.  Thanks all.

					Stephen Van Egmond

(apologies for the stupid typographical errors -- still not used to vi)
From: coatta@cs.ubc.ca (Terry Coatta)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Starboard II Help
Date: 1 Oct 92 22:44:10 GMT
Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: cascade.cs.ubc.ca

Thanks to the help of several fellow netters, I've got my Starboard II
up and running with the upper deck of RAM installed.  I also have the
MFM board and when I tried to run:

   sdset parity

my Amiga crashed (it printed out a message to the effect that it
was setting parity bits, did NOT print out a message about
disaling interrupts, and then guru'ed).  I'm running 1.3, and the
parity RAM chips are installed.  I've run a memory test, and the
memory on the SB II seems OK.

Is sdset 1.3 challenged?



-- 
Terry Coatta (coatta@cs.ubc.ca)
Dept. of Computer Science, UBC, Vancouver BC, Canada

`What I lack in intelligence, I more than compensate for with stupidity'
From: chet@netcom.com (Eric Chet)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: A500/2.04 Problems?
Date: 4 Oct 92 17:49:48 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <BvLsH2.8ws@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> svanegmo@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu (Stephen Van Egmond) writes:
>Hello everyone.  I seem to be encountering a few diffiulties all of a
>sudden from my A500.  It's got a GVP sitting hanging off the side with
>a 52 quantum, 2 megs of RAM, and a somewhat rickety C= A501 on the inside
>(the clock appears to have died, but it's been like that for some time).
>
>I've been running a (legally obtained, if you're wondering) kickstart file
>for 2.04 for many months now.  Just last night, it refuses to kick over
>from 1.3 to 2.04.   The kick program loads fine, & all the debug information
>checks out.   After the 5-second wait for reboot, the screen colors, CAPS
>light and power indicator go through the necessary gyrations, but the
>computer wakes up in 1.3.   It seems all of a sudden that the ROMTags
>aren't holding, and I can find no good explanation for it software-wise,
>so I might as well go looking for help hardware-wise.  It's a long, long
>way from here to an Amiga dealer with a good reputation, so any help
>or ventures as to what might be the cause would be appreciated.
>
SoftKicking was made for developers to test KS revisions before sunk 
into ROM.  I would suggest getting the ROM, if you still need 1.3 get
a ROM switcher.

Eric


>Public or private responses are fine.  Thanks all.
>
>					Stephen Van Egmond
>
>(apologies for the stupid typographical errors -- still not used to vi)
>


-- 
~
/**************************************************************************
 * Eric Chet       | Amiga does it better
 * chet@netcom.com | Ray Tracing and other graphics techniques 
 * BIX: chet       | "Use what is useful, simply to simplify"
 */
From: Tony-Preston@cup.portal.com (ANTHONY FRANCIS PRESTON)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Dead processer slot.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 06:48:52 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

Sorry to hear about Buster..... I will refrain from other comments
that come to mind.  The LED is controlled by the CIA chip, you may
have killed one of those in the process.  Try a CIA swap(er... make
sure you put...no I wont say it).
From: tim@tsp.med.umn.edu (Tim Leonard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Pass-through box for 2000 cards on 500?
Date: 30 Sep 92 03:46:17 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota

Is anyone aware of a pass-through type box that can be used
on the 500, in the expansion slot, between the computer and 
hard drive, so that a 2000 style card (Emplant, in this case)
can be used. I have a GVP-HD+ and I guess that it has no  
allowance for continuing the bus.  I have been told that some 
cases exist, that allow the drive on the other end.

Any help is appreciated,

Tim Leonard
Uof Minn
tim@lenti.med.umn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: bevis@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Jeff Bevis)
Subject: Re: a4000 an possible deinterlacer.
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 04:11:38 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.014034.18215@news.iastate.edu> barrett@iastate.edu (Marc N Barrett) writes:
>In article <1992Oct4.045128.368@sol.cs.wmich.edu> 22black@sol.cs.wmich.edu (Martin E. Black) writes:
>>I would like to ask if it is now possible to have a deinterlacer.  deinterlace
>>superhires.  That is for the 800x600 mode on a 50khz monitor.  I ask this
>>because if i got an a4000 i would like to get a good monitor for the future
>>and it is hard to find HIGH frequency multiscan monitors.  I usually see
>>monitors going from 30khz - 60khz or so.  And they don't often drop down to 
>>below 30khz.  
>
>   It's possible, but it would require a card with four times as much memory 
>as a standard Amiga "flicker-fixing" card.  Worse, the memory would have to 
>be at least fout times faster to boot.  The costs of such a card would likely
>be enormous.  Heck, the standard Amiga flicker-fixing cards still go for well
>over $200.  Would there be a market for a card that deinterlaces the
>Super HiRes and Super72 modes that costs about $1,500?  If there is, somebody
>will make it.
>

Not necessarily.  Anyway, 4x bandwidth can be achieved thru either 1) 
memory which is 4x as fast (expensive), or 2) memory of the same speed
which is 4x as wide, with a few fast shift registers (cheap).  Obviously,
the latter route would be taken in any practical design.  That's not to
say a new deinterlacer wouldn't cost more;  surely it would.  It would
be somewhat more complex (24-bit color, wider memory + buffering), true.
But the biggest cost factor is actually producing it for the miniscule
market at the present time.  Hopefully, that will change! 


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Oh, my beloved ice cream bar!  How I love to lick your creamy center -- and
your oh-so-nutty chocolate covering.  You're not like the others -- you like
the same things I do! Wax paper... boiled football leather... dog breath!" -Ren
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: lionel@cs.city.ac.uk (Lionel Tun)
Subject: Re: A2091 - thanks!
Organization: City University, London
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 12:43:22 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.115015.13288@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> rmwhapham@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu writes:
>In article <1992Oct2.101453.12920@city.cs>, lionel@cs.city.ac.uk (Lionel Tun) writes:
>> Thank you for the information on attaching a 2nd hard drive to
>> the A2091 SCSI controller.
>> 
>> I have the version 6.1 ROMs which I will get updated to 6.6
>> asap. The consensus was that this was the problem, there being
>> a bug in the software. Apparently the rest of the set up was
>> ok.
>> 
>> I wonder whether the 6.6 ROM is a free bug fix, or would I
>> have to pay for it?
>> 
>> --
>> Lionel Tun   (lionel@cs.city.ac.uk)
>> Vision Group, City University, London, EC1V 0HB. 071-477 8000 x 3889
>
>Let me know what you find out (i.e., where I can get the upgrade and how 
>much $$).  I'm pretty sure I've got the 6.1 ROMS (haven't opened the case 
>up in a while) and would like to add a second drive (preferrably internal) 
>in the near future (50M is just NOT ENOUGH for DTP).  As always, thanks in 
>advance...

Not much of an upgrade! Just a bug fix. I asked CBM (UK) and they
said their service company sells them. I thought oh-oh, megabucks
and I was not mistaken. Over $60 dollars probably. Criminal. More
than the cost of a 2nd hand controller. I am usually a strong
defender of software copyright and totally against copying. But
this sort of profiteering from loyal customers makes me wonder
whether I could blow some roms from someone who had an image of
the 6.6.

Compare with NEC. I bought an NEC P7+ printer 2nd hand. There was
a problem with paper handling, I contacted NEC and they immediately
offered to send me new roms that fixed the problem. I suppose CBM
(the marketing dept anyway) do not have a reputation to lose.

>Rob Whapham
>Etc. Publishing
>(rmwhapham@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu)


--
Lionel Tun   (lionel@cs.city.ac.uk)
Vision Group, City University, London, EC1V 0HB. 071-477 8000 x 3889
From: mks@cbmvax.commodore.com (Michael Sinz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: GForce 40MHz OVERCLOCKING........
Date: 30 Sep 92 15:45:11 GMT
Reply-To: mks@cbmvax.commodore.com (Michael Sinz)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA

menegon@ghost.dsi.unimi.it (marco menegon) writes:
>
>
>Hi, I have a GVP G-Force030 40Mhz and I want to overclock this board...does
>anyone know the MAX clock rate for a 40MHz processor ???  ( I think 46-48MHz
>but I don't know....)

Simple...  A 40MHz chip's *MAX* clock rate is 40MHz.  Some parts may happen
to run a bit faster, but if they all ran faster, Motorola would sell them
as, say 46MHz parts rather than 40MHz.  (People pay more for high speed
parts)

So, the answer is simple:  Read the value printed on the chip.

>Thanks in advance.
>Please mail the answer at the following address :
>
>  Internet: menegon@ghost.sm.dsi.unimi.it

/----------------------------------------------------------------------\
|      /// Michael Sinz  -  Senior Amiga Systems Engineer              |
|     ///                   Operating System Development Group         |
|    ///   BIX:  msinz      UUNET:  mks@cbmvax.commodore.com           |
|\\\///                                                                |
| \XX/                      HELP!  I am starting to like it here...    |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
From: f92anha@fy.chalmers.se (Anders Hammarqvist)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: FALCON VS AMIGA
Date: 29 Sep 92 18:04:34 GMT
Organization: Chalmers University of Technology, Physics Departement, Gothenburg

In article <y4kqRB1w163w@coyote.datalog.com> cobra@coyote.datalog.com (Ken Thompson) writes:
>rico@disaster.hacktic.nl (Rico Jansen) writes:
>
>> Atari has no OS, or would you call TOS an OS ?
>> 
>> Rico Jansen (rico@disaster.hacktic.nl)
>
>What...you call MS-DOS an OS, I guess Atari can call TOS an OS...  :)
>

No, no, MS-DOS is only an advanced boot-strap loader :)
 
>
>           _____         ______________________   _____                
>       |/    |          | cobra@datalog.com   |     |        /\        
>       |\ en |hompson   | cobra@jab.tus.az.us |     |ucson, /--\rizona 
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------

Anders Hammarquist
f92anha@fy.chalmers.se (Yes, Sweden :)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst)
Subject: Re: DOMINO-graphic-card?
Organization: Max-Planck-Institut f"ur Radioastronomie
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 14:03:04 GMT

In <harry.02qt@elfuerte.fipnet.fi> harry@elfuerte.fipnet.fi (Harri P Pesonen) writes:
>> The board can pass through the original Amiga video signal which is used
>> to display other screens as the workbench.

>Are you saying that Amiga video signal goes through Zorro bus?  The ad says
>that the board has a fallback mode for unsupported screens but it supports
>workbench, of course.

The video signal isn't passed over the Zorro bus. Instead you just
use a small cable from the Amiga's video output to the board.

As I've learned it is also possible to redirect any screen to the board
based on a list of screen names. For Screens with an unknown name you
get a requester that asks you wether it should be redirected.

Regards,
-- 
Michael van Elst
UUCP:     universe!local-cluster!milky-way!sol!earth!uunet!unido!mpirbn!p554mve
Internet: p554mve@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: uzun@crash.cts.com (Roger Uzun)
Subject: Re: A4000s are quality machines
Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA
Date: 05 Oct 92 16:33:21 PDT
Keywords: 4000 Amiga AGA AA

I posted a msg about problems I had with my new A4000, I would like
to clear things up and say that I have ordered many machines
from C= before, and this new A4000 and an old, refurbished A500
are the only ones I have ever had any problem with.
I also know dozens of other people who have A4000's and to my
knowledge mine is the only one with any problem.
It is a new machine, but with the degree of surface mounting,
and given the quality of the products I have purchased from
C= in the past, I have total confidence that the A4000 is one
of the most reliable micros available today.

So in summary, I was unlucky, my A4000 was bad when I received it,
(judging from the way the box was mangled by UPS, I am not
so sure they did not do it in shipping), but I firmly believe
that the A4000 is a very stable, reliable machine, and I doubt
that quality control will be a problem with this line.


-Roger
--------------------------------------------------------------
bix: ruzun
NET: uzun@crash.cts.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: andy@csqx.cs.rhbnc.ac.uk (Andy Thomas)
Subject: test
Organization: /home/cstx/andy/.organization
Distribution: uk.test
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 15:37:06 GMT

hello world
test
--
--
Information Security Group              |  mail: andy@cs.rhbnc.ac.uk
Computer Science Department             |  uucp: ...!mcvax!uknet!rhbnc!andy
Royal Holloway, University of London    |  talk: +44 784 443436 (direct)
Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, England         |   fax: +44 784 443420
From: Hytec@cup.portal.com (Brandon Lee Worrell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: A4000s are quality machines
Date: Tue,  6 Oct 92 16:38:25 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

>I posted a msg about problems I had with my new A4000, I would like
>to clear things up and say that I have ordered many machines       
>from C= before, and this new A4000 and an old, refurbished A500    
>are the only ones I have ever had any problem with.                
>I also know dozens of other people who have A4000's and to my      
>knowledge mine is the only one with any problem.                   
>It is a new machine, but with the degree of surface mounting,      
>and given the quality of the products I have purchased from        
>C= in the past, I have total confidence that the A4000 is one      
>of the most reliable micros available today.                       
>                                                                   
>So in summary, I was unlucky, my A4000 was bad when I received it, 
>(judging from the way the box was mangled by UPS, I am not         
>so sure they did not do it in shipping), but I firmly believe      
>that the A4000 is a very stable, reliable machine, and I doubt     
>that quality control will be a problem with this line.             
>                                                                   
>                                                                   
>-Roger                                                             
>--------------------------------------------------------------     
>bix: ruzun                                                         
>NET: uzun@crash.cts.com

Could you tell me where you purchased this from that they shipped it UPS?
Or are you a dealer?

Brandon Worrell
HyTec Computers
Voice:      206-456-7656
FAX:        206-456-7657
Orders Only:800-578-6504