HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tnixon@hayes.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: PP 14400FXSA DTE speed problem
Date: 12 Aug 92 15:25:12 EDT
Organization: Hayes Microcomputer Products, Norcross, GA

In article <1992Aug7.205324.22377@cs.tulane.edu>, mb@cs.tulane.edu
(Mark Benard) writes: 

> We have several Practical Peripherals 14400FXSA modems which we want to
> communicate with our DTE at 38.4K on dial-in only lines.  The first one we
> bought (ROM version 1.11h) does exactly that;  when it answers it sets the
> DTE speed to 38.4K.  Then we bought several more (ROM version 1.12c) and
> found that they default to 19.2K when they answer.  Is there any way to
> change that?  I cannot find any info about setting DTE speed in the manual.

I'm assuming that the PPI guys did it the way we do it at Hayes,
which is that when the modem is powered-up or reset, it assumes the
DTE speed is whatever speed was used to issue the last "AT&W"
command to write to non-volatile memory.  The &W command stores the
speed and parity along with the parameter settings.  It sounds like
the last &W command was issued at 19200 on the modems you got; you
can make them answer with a 38400 DTE speed by issuing an &W command
to them at 38400.
 
I'll forward your message to the guys at PPI, so they can check the
factory procedures and be sure they're setting the modems to 38400
before they get shrink-wrapped.

-- 
Toby Nixon, Principal Engineer      | Voice   +1-404-840-9200  Telex 401243420
Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc.  | Fax     +1-404-447-0178  CIS   70271,404
P.O. Box 105203                     | BBS     +1-404-446-6336  AT&T    !tnixon
Atlanta, Georgia  30348             | UUCP uunet!hayes!tnixon  Fido   1:114/15
USA                                 | Internet                tnixon@hayes.com
From: tnixon@hayes.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Hardware vs xon/xoff flow control.
Date: 14 Aug 92 11:16:20 EDT
Organization: Hayes Microcomputer Products, Norcross, GA

In article <BswMMt.4Jz@zoo.toronto.edu>, henry@zoo.toronto.edu
(Henry Spencer) writes: 

> RS232D, aka EIA232D, the latest revision, has an optional provision for
> RTS-CTS hardware flow control.  

The latest version is EIA-232-E, which also adds the 26-pin 
high-density connector.

-- 
Toby Nixon, Principal Engineer      | Voice   +1-404-840-9200  Telex 401243420
Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc.  | Fax     +1-404-447-0178  CIS   70271,404
P.O. Box 105203                     | BBS     +1-404-446-6336  AT&T    !tnixon
Atlanta, Georgia  30348             | UUCP uunet!hayes!tnixon  Fido   1:114/15
USA                                 | Internet                tnixon@hayes.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
From: anton@analsyn.gts.org (Anton J Aylward)
Subject: Re: WorldBlazer throughput
Organization: ASCI: UNIX Database and Communications
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:35:12 GMT

monty%roscom@think.com (Monty Solomon) writes:
: 
: I've recently performed several performance tests using both a Telebit
: T2500 and a Telebit WorldBlazer to connect with a remote WorldBlazer
: that has the new EPROMs.
: 
: Both WorldBlazers are hardwired for a DTE speed of 38400.
: 
: ....
: 
: WB <-> WB, PEP, compressed data, compression off
: received data 123711 bytes 67.43 secs (1835 cps)
: received data 157017 bytes 85.29 secs (1841 cps)
: received data 153413 bytes 83.41 secs (1839 cps)
: received data 183755 bytes 99.56 secs (1846 cps)
: received data 194403 bytes 105.17 secs (1848 cps)
: received data 34405 bytes 19.62 secs (1754 cps)
: sent data 360885 bytes 182.15 secs (1981 cps)
: sent data 360885 bytes 185.00 secs (1951 cps)
: sent data 360885 bytes 183.97 secs (1962 cps)
: sent data 360885 bytes 184.28 secs (1958 cps)

Looks like you're I/O limited.
"out of the box" g(7,64)/38400 "&F3" I'm getting a ridiculous
2002 to 2008 cps pretty constantly on newsbatches.  
The curious thing is that this figure is for both Rx and Tx.

I've not tried tuning.
Results with T-2500s are around the 1400 to 1550, again "out of the
box".  Curiously  TB+ are a little faster.  I'm not making any great
boasts here as some of these sites are un-tuned.

Xenix sites seem to run particularly fast !!

--
Anton J Aylward
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gtoal@ibmpcug.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Twincom Modems
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 13:28:11 GMT

>bjesiek@telstr.mi.org (Brent Jesiek) writes:
: Does anybody out there know of Twincom modems are any good? They seem to have
: all the features and protocols all of the other modems have, but it's difficult
: to tell the quality of the modem by reading an ad or two. Please post your
: experiences (good or bad) with these modems!

Used a V32bis 14.4K Twincomm for several months now (since they came on
sale in the UK from Grampian in Aberdeen at $UK400 - a touch dear but you
get a decent UK power supply) and I've had *no* problems.  faultless.
And it's in use once every hour, at least...

G
-- 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.dcom.fax,de.comm.misc
From: rodney@tyrell.tynet.sub.org (Rodney Volz)
Subject: Re: Highspeed US Robotics modem with fax send/receive ?
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 23:09:44 GMT
Organization: Tyrell, Stuttgart (FRG)

In article <BsxE2C.9n9@gator.rn.com> larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>dlparker@dlpinc00.rn.com (David L. Parker) writes:
>>I talked to my USR rep yesterday (or the day before), and he told me that
>>all the Courier series (Dual Standard, v.32bis, HST) are now being produced
>>with fax s/r capabilities.  I don't know about overseas availability.
>
>and the price is down to $449 USD

Wie sieht's mit Upgrades fuer existierende Modem-Versionen aus?
Irgendwelche Geruechte?

Heard anything about upgradeability of existing USR modems?
Any rumours?

-Rodney
-- 
                     Rodney Volz - 7000 Stuttgart 1 - FRG
 ==================> ...uunet!unido!mcshh!tyrell!rodney <===================
  Tyrell: +49 711 651429 V32bis Public access - rodney@tyrell.tynet.sub.org
  \_____________ May your children and mine live in peace. _______________/
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: at615@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Nick Lucky)
Subject: Re: 16550A UART upgrade.
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 92 20:03:03 GMT


I have seen a utility being sold with some serial cards with
the 16550a uart chip that must be used to turn the FIFO
buffer on or off. I didn't get a card from the co. that sells
the card with the utility and was woundering if I deeded this
program to turn my 16550A on and off???? If I do need it then
why is there only one co. out there that I know of that is supplying
this utility? Do all 16550A uarts on anybodys cards need a util.
to turn the buffers on and off or is it just that co. that
is making that one card that is in need of the utility???
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: p45dpmg@bigbrd.agchem.redwater.iol.ca (Peter Graw)
Subject: Re: ZyXEL 16,800 and voice-mail
Organization: Imperial Oil Limited
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 17:02:24 GMT

As of what ROM release is the 16,800 mode supported?


-- 
Peter Graw    (peter@iol.ca)
Information Management 
Esso Chemical Canada
From: tad@ssc.wa.com (Tad Cook)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Modem tax back
Date: 19 Aug 92 02:49:08 GMT
Organization: very little

In article <1992Aug14.070225.4098@fasttech.uucp> zeke@fasttech.uucp (Bohdan Tashchuk) writes:
>In <1992Aug12.211954.19466@ssc.wa.com> tad@ssc.wa.com (Tad Cook) writes:
>
>>Oh, great!  Then the rural users pay thousands of dollars per
>>month for the "true cost" of providing service into low desity
>>areas, and the telcos just fight over providing the lowest cost
>>service to big customers in the city.  Some telephone service!
>
>The US government already squanders many, many billions of dollars a year in
>farm subsidies. I see no reason why I should subsidize farmers in yet another
>manner. Nor do I see any reason why I should subsidize rich yuppie DINKs who
>think they are getting closer to nature, burn many gallons of fuel every day
>commuting to work, and still feel they are entitled to "universal" service.
>
>It's very easy to argue for "entitlements", like cheap phone service miles
>from the nearest town. People are free to make that kind of lifestyle choice,
>but they shouldn't try to convince me it's somehow in my best interest to
>help them pay for it.
>

Then go argue with your PUC and convince them that universal service
is not in the public interest!  But remember that the original
poster was using his opposition to universal service and any
cross subisidies from business to residential service as a justification
for spreading false rumors about a non-existent "modem tax."



-- 
 Tad Cook     |  Phone:  206-527-4089  (home)     |   MCI Mail: 3288544   
 Seattle, WA  |  Packet: KT7H @ N7DUO.WA.USA.NA   |   3288544@mcimail.com 
              |  Internet: tad@ssc.wa.com        or...sumax!ole!ssc!tad   
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: isca@icaen.uiowa.edu (Iowa Student Computer Assoc)
Subject: Document on ZyXEL voice mode available
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 07:07:00 GMT
Organization: Iowa Computer Aided Engineering Network, University of Iowa


  I recently called the ZyXEL BBS and as discussed here before, there are
a new set of roms (r5.00) that do voice mail.  I've put up the documentation
on this new mode on grind.isca.uiowa.edu (128.255.19.233) in /misc/ZyXEL.
The file is voice.txt.
  If there is interest, I'll talk to the ZyXEL techs and see if they mind me
distributing the beta ROMS.  When I asked for access to them, they seemed to
give it quite freely.

  Would anyone be interested in working with me on a replacement getty for 
unix that would answer in the voice mode and take voice mail, fax, and data
connects?  There are a lot of fun things you could do with this...

 - dave

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  David Lacey                           | Try the ISCA BBS and Archives    |
|  President, Iowa Student Computer Assn | Telnet/FTP: grind.isca.uiowa.edu |
|  The University of Iowa                | telnet/rlogin in as iscabbs      |
|  David-Lacey@uiowa.edu                 | 3 GIG of disk space and growing  |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: pjh@mccc.edu (P. J. Holsberg)
Subject: WB Strangeness
Organization: The College on the Other Side of U. S. 1
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 22:27:06 GMT

Callers who use non-Telebit modems report having to hit <Enter> upwards
of a dozen times before getting a "login:" prompt when they call my WB.
Its registers look like this:

at&vs70?s72?s74?s78?

WorldBlazer - SA - Version LA5.00W- Active Configuration
 B1  E1  L3  M1  Q2  T   V1  X2  Y1 
&C1 &D3 &G0 &J0 &L0 &Q0 &R3 &S1 &T4 &X0 
S000:1   S001=0   S002=43  S003=13  S004=10  S005=8   S006=2   S007=40 
S008=2   S009=6   S010=14  S011=70  S012=50  S018=0   S025=5   S026=1  
S038=0   S041:1   S045:255 S046=0   S047:20  S048=0   S050=0   S051:254
S056=17  S057=19  S058:0   S059=0   S060=0   S061:0   S062=15  S063=0  
S064:1   S068=255 S069=0   S090=0   S092:1   S093=8   S094=1   S100=0  
S104=0   S105=1   S111:30  S112=1   S151=4   S155=0   S180:3   S181=1  
S183=25  S190=1   S191=7   S253=10  S254=255 S255=255 
18031

18031

208 PACKETS TRANSMITTED
203 PACKETS RECEIVED
0 PACKETS RE-TRANSMITTED
0 PACKETS NACKED
100

OK

What have I got set wrong? (AT&T SV/386 R3.2.2)
From: Zero.One@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ZyXEL version 5.00 ROM Binaries Available
Date: 18 Aug 92 13:33:47 GMT
X-Sender: newtout 0.01 Jul 13 1992


 > Organization: Questor|Free Usenet News|Vancouver, BC: +1 604 681
 > 0670
 > From: sp@questor.wimsey.bc.ca (Steve Pershing)
 > Message-ID: 65coPB2w165w@questor.wimsey.bc.ca
 > Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,alt.dcom.modems

 > The ZyXEL modem version 5.00 ROM binaries are now available by
 > "mail-server"
 > request for anyone who can use them.

 > The binaries are only intended for the U-1496S model (with LCD
 > display).
 > Among the features supported are:

 >         - Caller ID
 >         - Voice-Mail
 >         - 16,800bps speed (ZyXEL proprietary mode)

 > To retrieve this file (automatically uu-encoded into 60K blocks),
 > send
 > a blank e-mail message to:

 >         mail-server@questor.wimsey.bc.ca

 > In the BODY of the text, starting at the left margin, enter the
 > following:


 >         /GET prodinfo/zyxel/rm500s.zoo
 >         INFO INDEX
 >         INFO FILINDX
 >         HELP

 > The ZOO file will be automatically UUencoded.  If you prefer
 > XXencoding,
 > add the word    XXencode   after the filename:

 >         /GET prodinfo/zyxel/rm500s.zoo xxencode

 > If you do not have UNIX ZOO sources or ZOO binaries for DOS, they
 > are also
 > available.  The INFO FILINDX file will show you their location.


Steve,

I understand that you are trying to do a service to the public, but I must ask 
that you stop making the V5.00 Rom binaries available.  We have the code in a 
secured area of our BBS for a reason.  We do not want beta version to be
distributed to the general public.

Thank you in advance for responding to this immediately.

Tyrone Horton
(Zero One)
Tech Support
ZyXEL USA


--- TosScan 1.00
From: Zero.One@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Document on ZyXEL voice mode available
X-Sender: newtout 0.01 Jul 13 1992
Date: 17 Aug 92  10:17:36

 > Organization: Iowa Computer Aided Engineering Network, University
 > of Iowa
 > From: isca@icaen.uiowa.edu (Iowa Student Computer Assoc)
 > Message-ID: 1992Aug14.070700.13474@news.uiowa.edu
 > Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems


 >   I recently called the ZyXEL BBS and as discussed here before,
 > there are
 > a new set of roms (r5.00) that do voice mail.  I've put up the
 > documentation
 > on this new mode on grind.isca.uiowa.edu (128.255.19.233) in /
 > misc/ZyXEL.
 > The file is voice.txt.
 >   If there is interest, I'll talk to the ZyXEL techs and see if
 > they mind me
 > distributing the beta ROMS.  When I asked for access to them, they
 > seemed to
 > give it quite freely.

 >   Would anyone be interested in working with me on a replacement
 > getty for
 > unix that would answer in the voice mode and take voice mail, fax,
 > and data
 > connects?  There are a lot of fun things you could do with this...

Dave,

The form that you signed to become a beta tester specifically prohibits you
from distributing the code.

Tyrone Horton
(Zero One)
Tech Support
ZyXEL USA


--- TosScan 1.00
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mr@rat.cica.indiana.edu (Michael Regoli)
Subject: Upgrade for Combined IO (UART/Parallel) Chip?
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 03:39:57 GMT


Both my UARTs (16450 w/no FIFO buffers *sigh*) are combined in a
wonderful Japanese product:  the Chips and Technologies 82C605 
(one IO chip that has both UARTs and the parallel port).  

Does anyone know of a C&T drop-in replacement that has a better
FIFO'ed UART??

I just know my PM14400FXSA external would love a new UART... :-)

--
michael regoli
mr@cica.indiana.edu
regoli@iubacs.BITNET
..{ames, rutgers}!iuvax!cica!mr
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: ged@phantom.cs.hut.fi (Camillo S{rs)
Subject: Re: *Advice* needed on modems
Reply-To: Camillo.Sars@hut.fi
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, CS lab
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 14:51:29 GMT

In <14192@mindlink.bc.ca> David_Hunter@mindlink.bc.ca (David Hunter) writes:

>I have been using the Supra 14.4 Fax/Modem for about a month now and have found
>its performance to be questionable.  As a fax machine it is completely
>unreliable.  I would say that my success rate in sending and receiving faxes
>has been around 18 of 30 attempts.  As a modem it has also behaved oddly.  It
>has managed to do things like reset itself to its default settings after I had
>changed them and wrote them to "nonvolatile" memory.  Also, I have been unable
>to connect to some systems at high speed and have had to force the modem to a
>lower baud to be able to get more than garbage on the screen---you can't even
>connect to Supra at 14.4.  In addition, I have experienced crashes during file
>transfers that never happened with my old modem.

-	The Fax part is shaky, but have you considered the possibility
that the OTHER end is at fault?

-	Not being able to connect to all systems at 14.4k is NORMAL.
The standard telephone network supports speeds UP TO 14.4k, but bad
lines are common everywhere. In less developed countries 14.4k would
be utopia!

-	If your old modem was <14.4k have you considered the
possibility that your comm program can't handle high speeds?

-	Yeah, Supra sometimes gets it wrong.

>I understand that Supra is working on another ROM upgrade to correct some of
>these problems, but the ship date for this fix is constantly being moved ahead.
>The shop that sold me my Supra (BTW the first unit wouldn't fax at all and I
>had to exchange it) has offered to exchange it for another brand.  I am
>seriously looking around for a comparable alternative myself.

It seems that a lot of people are catching on to the "blame Supra for
everything, including AIDS" thingie. OK, the V1.000 ROMs were crap,
but the V1.200-C ROMs are much better. A large portion of problems
reported seem to be caused by the user, not by the modem...

A satisfied V1.200-C owner.

--
ged@hut.fi                   Amiga 500 //
ged@niksula.cs.hut.fi             2.04// Aim for the impossible and you
Department of Computer Science    \\ //   will achieve the improbable.
Helsinki University of Technology  \X/     --- Camillo S{rs
From: gerrit@laosinh.stgt.sub.org (Gerrit Heitsch)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: ROM size of Supra v32bis
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 20:20:53 MET
 <0-PCNews-124beta@rshark.mixcom.com>
Distribution: world
Organization: Lao-Sinh project (private UUCP site)

In article <0-PCNews-124beta@rshark.mixcom.com>, Brian Kapitan writes:

> Sure there are. AMD (among others) makes EPROMS faster than 55ns. Other
> choices would be Cypress, Idt.
I use an AM27H256-55 for my selfmade update from 1.000E to 1.200C.
Works fine.

> Plus, i'd love to see the Rockwell data sheet, since my modem's got a pair
> of -12's.  and the old roms had a fast (70ns) and a slow (>100ns)...
Are you sure, that your EPROMs are -12 and your CPU is a C1999-16?
I have a sample circuit diagram from Rockwell for the RC144DP and the
parts list clearly states that you have to use a 55ns EPROM!
The original EPROMs were one 27HC256-55 from CSI and one 27C256-12 from
Taiwan microchip.

Take a closer look at your EPROMs, maybe there is an additional
marking on them.

Gerrit

-- 
         Gerrit Heitsch  Moenchweg 16  7038 Holzgerlingen  Germany
  Logical adresses: UUCP: gerrit@laosinh.stgt.sub.org FIDO: (2:247/706.9)
                 If you are from outer space, please use:
  universe!local-cluster!milkyway!solarsystem!terra!europe!laosinh!gerrit
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: berger@atropa (Mike Berger)
Subject: Re: Supra/Computability modem export ban - more info!
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 14:34:24 GMT

Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes:
>Almost anyone with any sense knows that you can't use a US power supply
>outside Canada and the US and a handful of other places. Almost the whole
>world is on 220volts. South America I don't know about at all though.
*----
This brings up a question.  I've been told that a lot of electrical
items in England come without mains plugs because they're different
in many places.  So how do they use these stupid external wall-plug
type power supplies?
--
	Mike Berger
	Department of Statistics, University of Illinois
	AT&TNET     217-244-6067
	Internet    berger@atropa.stat.uiuc.edu
From: aaron@spectrx.saigon.com (Aaron Anderer - System)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: ZyXEL 16,800 and voice-mail
Date: 19 Aug 92 00:03:39 GMT
Organization: SPECTROX SYSTEMS (408)252-1005 Silicon Valley, Ca

Zero.One@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org writes:

>  > What kind of protocol does the 16800 use? Is it compatible with
>  > anything on this planet?
> 
> ZyXEL's 16.8k is an extention of V.32bis and as of this writing, it can only
> connect to another.  We have been in contact with other modem manufacturers i
> regards to implementing it into their modems.
> 
> Tyrone Horton
> (Zero One)
> Tech Support
> ZyXEL USA
well please talk to Supra about this.  I'm not sure if it is possible to
push the rockwell 14.4k chipset to 16.8, but remember that the 9600 chipset was 
able to go up to 12k.  <sigh> I want a faster modem.  

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron Anderer, System Operator                aaron@spectrx.saigon.com
SPECTROX SYSTEMS +1 408 252 1005              szebra!spectrx!aaron          
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: thompson@atlas.socsci.umn.edu (T. Scott Thompson)
Subject: Re: 9600 D/L U/L With Telix Info needed: Help Please!
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 15:10:24 GMT

at615@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Nick Lucky) writes:


>I have Telix v3.12 and a 9600 baud modem. I can't get over 905 to

>945 CPS in a D/L. I am set at 38.4 with V.42bis compression on.

>I am testing with GIF and ZIP files!!!

Since GIF and ZIP files are already compressed, your V.42bis
compression cannot make them smaller, and may actually make them
larger.  Thus the best throughput that you can expect is 9600 baud
with these files, even though your computer - modem connection is at
38.4.  Given this, I think that 900+ CPS is about as good as you can
expect.  You might get slightly faster CPS by turning modem
compression off when moving precompressed files around.
From: davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Dial tones
Keywords: Dial tones
Date: 17 Aug 92 09:28:23 GMT
Organization: Aegis Society, Kyoto Japan

ajchuah@mtu.edu ([*BARK*]) writes:

>Hi netters,
>          I plan to buy a high speed modem and i am looking 
>into USR or ZyXEL.  My main problem is i plan to take it back
>home with me, i am from Malaysia.  I will be here(US) for a 
>while more but i understand there may be dial tone problems
>if i take a US made modem back home with me.  Anyone know of any
>way to get by such problems?  Is there a way to "teach" these
>modems to understand dial tones?  Any info related to this
>topic is welcome.  Thanx in advance.

I bought a U.S. Robotics some years ago and it acted weird when it
heard certain sounds but I was able to get it to run by keeping the
X level down so it didn't try to do anything fancy like listen for a
dial tone. 

Also, while some modem manufacturers claim that the problems
problems to do with their modems are due to different telcos, other
modems work well here. Hopefully somebody will reply from Malaysia
and you can find out what brand works OK there. 

Hope that helps,

Dave

--
Dave McLane 
JUNET: davidg@aegis.or.jp (ONLY within Japan: post otherwise)
Nagaokakyoshi, Kyoto Japan Tel: +81-75-951-1168 Fax: +81-75-957-1087
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: New WorldBlazer ROMs, connecting to old TB+: Any success?
Organization: The Gator Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-3745
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 13:58:29 GMT

jimb47@netcom.com (Jim Budler) writes:

>But I have a different question. When one of my uucp neighbors installed
>a WorldBlazer, he could no longer dial *into* our TB+ ROM level BC4.

there are digits assocaited with the ROM levels, ie: 5.01, 5.00, etc..
-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
Gator Communications                              uucp: ..!uunet!gator!larry