HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Wisconsin Woof-o-rama
Date: 8 Oct 92 16:38:06 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Madison

In article <1992Oct7.125401.1@pa621a.inland.com> copus@pa621a.inland.com writes:
>In article <1apl88INNho7@uwm.edu>, paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger) writes:
>>   Yes, the inevitable finally happened when Bucky's boys overcame the not- 
>>   so-mighty Buckeyes 20-16 Saturday. And it wasn't a fluke. UW pretty much
>>   controlled the offensive and defensive lines all day. How does 35 carries
>>   for 45 yards sound for the vaunted OSU backfield.
>>  
>>   Far from the last UW woofing, contrary to what some red-faced (or should I
>>   say cardinal as in Badger cardinal-and-white) Buckeye fans might think, ...
>
>    Keep it up salty.  The "Woof Gods" will get you in Iowa City!
>    And you will have no one to blame except yourself!

As president of the Cheesehead Academy, I am requesting that you leave one
of my finest students alone.

>| East Chicago, Indiana     | skunk - Lou Pinella      |

Funny that you have the word "skunk" in the same line as "East Chicago".
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
From: stassen@alc.com (Chris Stassen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: CFPOOL: Week #7 Entry
Date: 9 Oct 92 17:57:56 GMT
Organization: The Lion's Den, San Jose


Game list for 10/17 (18 games):
$
	Alabama at Tennessee
	Arizona at Stanford
	Auburn at Florida
	BYU at Wyoming
	California at Southern Cal
	Cincinnati at East Carolina
	Fresno State at Hawaii
	Houston at Baylor
	Iowa at Illinois
	Kentucky at Louisiana State
	Michigan State at Minnesota
	Mississippi at Arkansas (at Little Rock, AR)
	Missouri at Oklahoma State
	Oklahoma at Colorado
	Pittsburgh at Temple
	Syracuse at West Virginia
	Tulsa at Louisville
	UCLA at Washington State

Reminders:	Don't forget to order your predictions by 'confidence.'
		A recap sheet is sent to those entered by Wednesday (10/14).
		Let me know if you want to get entries/results via Email.
--
Chris Stassen			408-943-0630			stassen@alc.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: atchison@harp.cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark Atchison)
Subject: Re: Illini - At least one big win a year
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 18:41:05 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.143836.8967@ryn.mro4.dec.com> murphy@rock.enet.dec.com () writes:
>
>I did not have the benefit of sound in the bar that I was in.Noting net-bucks
>commentary on the last fumble.  It looked to me that on one of the two steps
>by the Bucks receiver, he was on the line.  What did the commentators have to
>say? (I just assumed he was out and didn't look too critically - after all,
>the call went our way).

Flashback for those who didn't see or don't recall:  the play in question was
a pass to fullback Jeff Cothran, one play before the second goal-line fumble.

The gripe is this:  if one of the two steps was on the line (and it *might*
have been), fine.  But the step in question was just beyond the 1 yard line.
The other foot made contact with the inside of the pylon before hitting any
spot on the turf.  Then either the ball is spotted at the 1, or it's a 
touchdown.

The ball was spotted about 4 inches out.  Blown call.  Ouch.  Yeah, they
should have won anyway, but...

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________________
 Mark Atchison, a.k.a. <atchison@cis.ohio-state.edu>; Graduate Student in the
Computer Science Dept, THE Ohio State University (NOT an Ohio State University)
		Any plagiarisms seen above are not my own...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: bjm1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Bobbie J. Mann)
Subject: Wooooo Piiiiigg Sooooieeeee
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 07:28:19 GMT

Sorry, I couldn't resist.  I haven't had much of a chance to do that this 
year (or the last 2 years for that matter :)     so I just had to.
For all you complaining about Jefferson Pilot showing the Hogs....I, for one
am glad to be seeing them.  Having lived in SEC country for years now, I have
very rarely been able to see my Hogs on TV.  The move into the SEC now allows
me to see alot more of them (oh that they get back to their standard of football!!!), and for that I am glad.  I for one, hate seeing 9 Notre Dame games in
a football season.

Roland

Soiieee-ing while he can

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rmt6r@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Roy Matthew Thigpen)
Subject: Re: Virginia WINS
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 03:08:55 GMT

There you go again, Mary whining about our pathetic schedule.  Hey I agree
with you, hell if we only didn't have to play Maryland, then we could play
a REAL team.  I thought you'd stop whining when your team won their first
game, but I guess we have to put up with your jealousy some more.  All I can
say is; "Gee, when was the last time Maryland was #10? Hmmmmmmmmm...."
Toolaloo for now, you Twerp.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: guest@ulysses.atmos.colostate.edu (Guest)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: CU's Kordell Stewart out for four weeks (Detmer Start)
Keywords: Koy Detmer, Kordell Stewart
Date: 12 Oct 92 21:09:42 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Atmos. Science, Colorado State Univ.

>In article <1992Oct12.184031.1192@den.mmc.com> kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com 
>(Kevin Rodgers) writes:
>
>From the 10/11 Denver Post:
>
>The X-rays taken on Friday revealed a fracture of the navicular bone (in
>his non-throwing hand).  The injury occurred when Stewart was hit in the
>third quarter after completing a pass to WR Michael Westbrook; Stewart
>thought he had sprained his thumb, and went on to complete 6 of his
>final 12 passes for 103 yards and 2 INTs.
>
>Kordell will be fitted with a cast that will prevent him from receiving
>center snaps, and he could return _at_the_earliest_ in 4 to 6 weeks.
>(Before badly spraining his foot against Baylor this year, he had never
>been injured playing football at any level.)
>
>McCartney hasn't confirmed that Detmer will start, but it's a near
>certainty; Duke Tobin would then be the backup, with Vance Joseph, who
>is now recovering from a sore shoulder and had planned to redshirt,
>behind him.  Tobin and Detmer were 3rd and 4th string through most of
>August, until Joseph hurt his shoulder and Stewart got the starting job
>by default.
>-- 
>Kevin Rodgers				kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com
>Martin Marietta MS A16401		(303) 790-3971
>116 Inverness Dr. East
>Englewood CO 80112 USA			GO BUFFS!

What does anyone think about Koy starting against Oklahoma. I was impressed
with what I saw in the 2 games that Koy played in (Minnesota and Iowa). If he
(Detmer) can have a good game against Oklahoma, watch out. I would think that
would be the confidence that he needs for the rest of the season, especially
with Kansas, Nebraska, and a possible bowl game coming up.  

But, if Oklahoma bounces him around, and he has trouble making completions, it
could be a big problem. So, this is a HUGE game coming up for the Buffaloes.
And, the weather forecast is for cold weather (game time temp of near 30 
degrees with possible snow flurries). Of course, this can't possibly help 
Gundy in any way too!

Just a few thoughts....... Looking forward to a hard hitting game this sat nite
in Boulder. There definately is no love loss between the Sooners and the Buffs.

John Knowles                                  Go RAMS 
knowles@tachu.atmos.colostate.edu             Greg Primus for the Heisman!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: sbanerj@eos.ncsu.edu (SANJEEV  BANERJIA)
Subject: Virginia LOSES (Flame Bait)
Originator: sbanerj@c00749-400wi.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: Sanjeev Banerjia
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 17:44:07 GMT


No offense, Virginia fans, but your boorish woofing on the net had grown a bit
tiresome (to be fair, the UVa regulars (read: Jay & Charlie) had shown their 
usual level-headedness).

This was my first opportunity (sic) to watch UVa this year, and the second time
I'd seen Clemson (the first was against FSU).  Frankly, I'd expected a UVa
blowout.  It seemed that they were getting on mid-season roll much like last
year.  Their second half letdown took me by surprise as did the emotion the
'Tigs displayed in their comeback.  Most surprising was the Swiss cheese UVa
run defense in the 2nd half.

All in all, a very exciting game.  And, never fear, Jay & Charlie, the annual
blowout over NCSU will put the Wahoos back on the right track...

Sanjeev
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder)
Subject: Re: Who is number 1?
Organization: American Math. Society
	<1992Oct05.164454.23680@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 21:38:37 GMT

In article <1992Oct05.164454.23680@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM> ldr@lightnin.Columbia.NCR.COM (Dale Robbins) writes:

   >In article <ASH.92Oct5090713@ulysses.mr.ams.com> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:
   >>
   >>Washington - played poorly against USC
   >>Miami - exciting but sloppy game.  Good defense.  Offense shaky all year.
   >>FSU - Nope.  Lost a game.
   >>Michigan - Perhaps the best team in the country right now, but has a tie.
   >>Texas A&M - barely beat texas Tech.
   >>
   >>
   >>Only Michigan had a good game this week in the top five.  Hopefully,
   >>
   >I think you had better start including UT in your calculations of the top five
   >and MNC race!!!!

   >Dale

At the time I posted, I was only looking at the previous week's top
five.  I personally would rank UT right up there.
From: demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Going, going, going...out on a limb
Date: 16 Oct 92 22:20:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: desire.1992Oct16.172033.4905
Organization: Demonic Possesions, Inc.


	Yes, it is I, bravely predicting that Boston College will upset Penn
State.

	Yet Another Hail Mary.

	You heard it here first.

:D

Brett                                                      
_______________________________________________________________________________
Proconsul Computer Consulting                                        CHA-CHING!
Better, Cheaper, Faster					       (Pick any two :)
Disclaimer:								   NOT!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: acdendy@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (ROGER DENDY)
Subject: Roger's Top 25--12 Oct
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 14 Oct 1992 19:30 EST  

Lots of losses in my top 25 last week, including the embarrassment of 
Tennessee losing in what was supposed to be the blowout of the week.  There 
are no undefeated teams left out of the top 25 at this point.

The top three have now spread out enough that the rankings are unlikely to 
change without one of them losing.  In response to all the UW-Miami 
bickering, I've added a column for schedule strength, as calculated by my 
algorithm.  A&M still looks like the best candidate to finish undefeated.

Team			Weight	Schedule Strength
----			------	-----
1 Washington (5-0)	2.9	1.4
2 Miami Fl (5-0)	2.4	1.2
3 Michigan (4-0-1)	2.1	1.0
4 Florida St (5-1)	2.1	1.3	Game of the Week:
5 Stanford (5-1)	2.0	1.5		4 Florida St vs
6 Texas A&M (5-0)	2.0	0.9		22 Georgia Tech
7 Alabama (6-0)		1.9	1.1
8 Mississippi St (4-1)	1.9	1.0	Alternate Game of the Week:
9 Kansas (4-1)		1.8	1.1		7 Alabama vs
10 Nebraska (4-1)	1.8	1.3		19 Tennessee
11 Colorado (5-0)	1.8	1.0
12 Boston Coll. (4-0-1)	1.8	1.0	Ugly Game of the Week:
13 Washington St (5-0)	1.8	1.3		2 Miami Fl vs
14 Syracuse (4-1)	1.8	1.2		98 TCU
15 Notre Dame (4-1-1)	1.8	1.2
16 USC (2-1-1)		1.8	1.6	Media Bias Winner of the Week:
17 Georgia (5-1)	1.8	1.1		21 Penn State (AP 9)
18 Virginia (5-1)	1.8	1.1
19 Tennessee (5-1)	1.7	0.9	Media Bias Loser of the Week:
20 Utah (4-1)		1.7	0.9		9 Kansas (AP 25)
21 Penn State (5-1)	1.6	1.1
22 Georgia Tech (4-1)	1.6	1.2
23 Ohio St (3-2)	1.6	1.1
24 Hawaii (3-1)		1.5	0.9
25 West Va (3-0-2)	1.5	1.2

Penn State has only played one good team (apologies to Bob Dieckmann, but 
Rutgers IS only 3-3; ranked 58, weight 1.0), and they lost.  They may be 
better than they have shown, but the computer doesn't recognize it until 
the do show it.  (Maybe that's why this program isn't any good at 
predicting games).

The Bottom Ten:

98 TCU (1-3-1)		0.3	1.1
99 New Mexico (1-5)	0.3	0.9
100 Kent (2-4)		0.1	0.8
101 Ohio (1-5)		0.1	0.7
102 UTEP (0-5)		0.0	1.0	Crummy Game of the Week:
103 Cal St Fulrtn (1-5)	-0.0	0.7		103 Cal St Fullerton vs
104 S Carolina (0-5)	-0.0	1.3		95 SW Louisiana
105 E Michigan (0-6)	-0.1	0.8
106 Pacific (0-5)	-0.1	0.8
107 Arkansas St (1-5)	-0.2	0.8

Note here that South Carolina, being in the SEC, has a much tougher 
schedule than any of these other teams.  When and if they win a game, that 
one win will be enough to propel them out of the bottom ten (as it did 
Arkansas).  A team like Kent, on the other hand, can manage two wins in the 
MAC and still barely make the Hot 100.

R Dendy
From: mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Pac10 is the best conference so far
Date: 13 Oct 92 18:55:15 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Ramblin' Wrecks from Georgia Tech

I wrote:

}> How about the ACC:
}> 
}> Florida State (6)
}> Georgia Tech (16)
}> Virginia (17)
}> Clemson (19)
}> North Carolina State (21)

chyang@langshan.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang) wrote:
}
}	This is another meaningless woof.

No, it was a *response* to a meaningless woof.  The meaningless woof
came from one of your PAC-10 woofing buddies, who was claiming the
PAC-10's 4 top 25 teams proved the PAC-10 was the best conference.

}                               I didn't think that ACC did too well 
}last season(with the exception of FSU of course).

Well the ACC went 1-1 against the MIGHTY PAC-10!!! last year in the bowls.
Perhaps only .500 ball against the left coasters is "not too well"
in your book?

-- 
Mark Mitchell           Georgia Tech            mm42@prism.gatech.edu
   "Close only counts in horseshoes and hand-grenades."
                                 "And computer rating systems."
From: v262xxve@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Timothy C Pitts)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Huskies Go Wee Wee
Date: 15 Oct 92 22:14:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <199210152002.AA19317@tuna.wang.com>, WILLIAM.S.BILL.W.ZUK@OFFICE.WANG.COM ("William S. Zuk") writes...
#  You have to wonder about the credibility of these postings based on
#  such "well-researched facts".  It is recommended that in the future
#  any posting discussing the upcoming BC-Miami game should simply be
#  deleted.

Now, I don't mind putting ``upcoming BC-Miami game'' in my killfile, but
I have a question:  Does this mean I also have to erase my tape of the 
Miami game where Keith Jackson and/or Bob Griese claimed that Miami still 
had to play BC?  Not that I mind losing their boneheaded comments, I just 
would like to preserve the game for posterity so that when my great grandkids 
ask about the greatest football team of all time, I can just pop in the tape.
I also wonder if this means the sports-talk guys in State College, PA,
(one of whom was Joe Paterno's brother) should be fired for making the
same stupid remark.

___

Timothy C. Pitts             
Canada US Trade Center
Department of Geography
University at Buffalo        
V262XXVE@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: wessir@stein.u.washington.edu (Bill the CAT)
Subject: Re: Miami Can Not Be Denied!!!
Organization: University of Washington
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 00:29:09 GMT


In article <1992Oct10.231835.23782@leland.Stanford.EDU> tremblay@leland.Stanford.EDU (Marc Tremblay) writes:
>In article <1992Oct10.192903.33776@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>>Alright fans, let's hear your arguments!!!  Who in the world can deny that
>>the Miami Hurricanes are the #1 team in the nation, without a doubt???
>>Not only are they undefeated...
>>Not only have they beat a number of ranked/tough opponents...
>>But...
>>
>>In successive weeks, they have taken down #3 Flordia State, and now, they
>>have travelled to #7 Penn State, and beat them on their own turf...
>
>Don't forget, they CRUSHED Arizona. A team that managed to TIE mighty
Yes, it was an amazing game that showed just how powerfull and explosive
that Miami team is.  In my opinion it showed just how weak the pac-10 really
is.  Obviosly the people who rank college teams can see that the pac-10 is
a weak conference that can't stand up to the powerhouse teams of the east.
>Oregon State, and BARELY lost to powerhouse Cal State Fullerton...
I'm sure that the people who rate college teams know also that #3 fsu and #7
penn state could also easily defeat washington's opponents.  That's why the
rest of the pac-10 aren't rated at the top.
>Yup, definite #1 ...
yep, I'm convinced...  that the rankings are biased to the east!
wessir

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K. Magee)
Subject: Re: SEC Preview (Oct. 10)
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:51:20 GMT

mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:
>very easy to pick.  With Greg Plump, Todd Jordan, or a redshirt freshman 

Let's add to the drama!  he's a true freshman!  

(Thanks for the optimistic outlook Mark!)

David

-- 
               David K. Magee | "Mandrake! Get over here and feed me that  
         MIS Graduate Student |  belt boy.  The Redcoats are coming! "
 Mississippi State University |
     dkm2@isis.cc.msstate.edu |   -  General Jack Ripper, Dr. Strangelove
From: mln@sunkj.larc.nasa.gov (Michael L Nelson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Va Tech and UVa predictions
Date: 16 Oct 1992 13:30:12 GMT
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA  USA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: sunkj.larc.nasa.gov
Keywords: thank you clemson!


Last Week:
Lousiville 21 Va Tech 17
predicted: Va Tech 24 Lousivlle 23

Clemson 29 Virginia 28
predicted: Virginia to win (exact score is lost)

my record: 6-3

this week:

NC State @ Va Tech

This is always a good game.  NCSU pounded Texas Tech
last week, and the chokies blew a 4th quarter lead
(for the nth time) to lose @ UL.  Va Tech's leading
rusher, Vaughn Hebron, will miss a few weeks.  Va Tech
may not win another game all year.  What happened to
the DeShazo miracles?  Perhaps they can
win this game on emotion, but probably not.  All I 
want for this year is to beat UVa.  Thats all I want.

NC State 34 Va Tech 14

UVa @ North Carolina

UVa finally lost.  Thank goodness.  Kirby will be out
for a few weeks - though he'll probably be back for Nov 21 :-(
UVa has always had trouble defending the run, and last 
week proved it again.  Unfortunately, it will seem
that they have rebounded by trouncing UNC.  I won't be
fooled - UNC is not a good football team.  Don't let
any hoos tell you different.

UVa 28 North Carolina 20

Michael Nelson

Go Hokies!  Go Tarheels!
Organization: Masters student, Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 11:38:23 -0400 
From: Terrel Huch <th1y+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: BYU vs. Fresno State

Did Lavell goof in going for the first down on fourth and short late in
the Fresno State game?  I don't think so.  The Cougar offense had so
much momentum at that point that FSU didn't have a chance to make a
stop.  BYU only needed a couple inches--its offensive line had been
blowing off the Bulldogs by a full yard on every play.

Going for it was safer than kicking, especially considering the recent
play of the special teams.  I think the coaching staff wanted to give
the offense a chance to determine the outcome of the game, rather than
giving special teams a chance to lose another one.

One criticism, though.  With timeouts to burn, why didn't the Cougars go
to the line once to try to pull FSU offsides?

Terry Huch
th1y+@andrew.cmu.edu
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: Pac Ten Review (10-10-92)
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 20:18:43 GMT

In article <1992Oct15.185416.23829@leland.Stanford.EDU> tremblay@leland.Stanford.EDU (Marc Tremblay) writes:
[Re: last week's UCLA-Stanford game]
>No problem. Stanford showed up a the Rose Bowl to play an Injury
>riddled Bruin squad in what turned out to be a defensive struggle.
. . . 
>The Bruins
>defense was impressive in stopping the Cardinal passing game. 
>Later, Mike Cook scored on a pass from Steve Stenstrom to make it 17-7
>Cardinal. 

One additional point - this touchdown pass came after Stanford intercepted
a pass from UCLA's QB, Rob Walker, inside the UCLA 30.  So, even on
this score, UCLA's defense was not totally to blame.

>Sean Lachapelle tried to play, despite cracked ribs, but left
>the game early without a catch, not wanting to worsen the injury.

LaChapelle might not play in the Washington State game.  Donahue is
actually pissed off at him for playing in the Stanford game, as he felt
LaChapelle might have slowed his recovery.

Rob Walker got an ankle sprain in the Stanford game, and limped through
most of the second half.  He is expected to start the Washington State
game.  Should his ankle prove too sore, John Barnes is the backup.
Barnes is a senior transfer from UC Santa Barbera, a Div II school.
(Actually, UCLA is his fourth school.  He started out at Saddleback
Community, then transferred to Western Oregon State, another Div II
school.)  Barnes passed for 2100 yards and 23 touchdowns at UCSB last 
year.  His best day at UCSB was 411 yards and 5 touchdowns.  UCSB dropped 
its program this year, so Barnes got a chance at a third school.  He's big 
(6'3", 210 lbs.) and strong.

Should both Walker and Barnes be lost, the next step is to activate
one of the two freshmen Donahue wants to redshirt, Ryan Fien or Scott
Fitterer.  Both are supposed to be good prospects, especially Fien.
Donahue claims that neither has had enough time at UCLA to learn the
offense.

--
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: pdunn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick L Dunn)
Subject: Re: One-sided Rivalries
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 21:37:54 GMT

How about Penn State-West Virginia?

PDunn
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder)
Subject: calling all volunteers
Organization: American Math. Society
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 14:08:02 GMT

Hey, what happened to the Tennessee fans that chastised me for leaving
them out of my "Who's number 1?" post?  Really, you guys shouldn't
drop off the face of the Internet just 'cause your team CHOKED.  So
now, to make up for the wrongful woofing I received, Tennessee must
beat Alabama.  Don't screw this up, Volunteers.
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Wisconsin Woof-o-rama
Date: 8 Oct 1992 19:36:03 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Oct7.125401.1@pa621a.inland.com> copus@pa621a.inland.com writes:
>>   Far from the last UW woofing, contrary to what some red-faced (or should I
>>   say cardinal as in Badger cardinal-and-white) Buckeye fans might think, ...
>> 
>>   --salty
>>  
>
>    Keep it up salty.  The "Woof Gods" will get you in Iowa City!
>    And you will have no one to blame except yourself!
>
   Actually, I think the Hawkeyes themselves should have enough to upend
   Bucky, even without the help of the "Woof Gods." Still, I'm just
   optimistic enough to go with the Badgers and the points. That is if I
   ever bet, which I'd never do since I'm such a law-abiding citizen!

   --salty


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college