HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v130pwbq@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Moon shines bright.
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:14:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <#jjqvxc@lynx.unm.edu>, baldwin@carina.unm.edu (Chris Baldwin) writes...
>In article <Bxs4pC.Fru@ns1.nodak.edu> sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (The Purple Bleeder ) writes:
>>I will never forget his gutsy play when he converted a
>>3rd and 4 situation by running for a 1st down. But he
>>paid for it and took a vicious hit for it and sprained
>>his shoulder.
>	As a big Oiler fan, I am quite concerned with Moon's condition.
>However, since The Hit(tm) I have heard conflicting reports of exactly
>what the injury is. I have heard that it is a sprained shoulder, broken
>collarbone, cracked vertebrae and a broken arm. All have agreed that he
>will be out 3-6 weeks. What is it really?

According to ESPN and the USA Today, Warren Moon is expected to miss 4-6 weeks
with a fracture in the upper area of his left arm.  
    _____________________________________________________________________
   |   Miami Dolphins and Hurricanes:        * Eric Orologio " Dr. O"    |
   |   Two of the Best teams in Football!    * V130pwbq @ubvms           |
   |_____________________________________________________________________|
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kary@col.hp.com (Dan Kary)
Subject: Glanville
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:12:27 GMT
Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division

I saw a replay from the Atlanta/Phoenix game in which Jerry Glanville
appeared to attempt to physically attack Billy Joe Tolliver.  Dieon
Sanders got between the two as other unidentified people tried to hold
both back.  I think Tolliver just threw an interception or something.
Looks like Glanville is out of control.  What do people in Atlanta think
of this?  I don't see how anyone can be saying anything positive about
Glanville today.

Dan (go flo) Kary
From: v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Jones....Touchdown 49'errrrrrs!
Keywords: 49'ers       21
Date: 21 Nov 92 19:13:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1ei2ehINNt8m@agate.berkeley.edu>, rege@bongo.Berkeley.EDU (Ashutosh G. Rege) writes...
>In article <Bxy36F.Ku2@acsu.buffalo.edu> v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...) writes:
> >In article <4835@equinox.unr.edu>, harrisl@unssun.nevada.edu (Larry Harris) 
> >	writes...
> >
> >>BTW, the 9'ers two minute offense was a work of art. Absolutely perfect. 
> >
> >No.  The Bills running the no-huddle makes every other team's two-minute offense
> >look befuddled and disarrayed by comparison.  Just how fast and how efficiently
> >they run it amazes me every time I see it.
> >
> >BILLS 26, 'FINS 20
> >
> >					---Chet Zeshonski
> 
> Clearly haven't seen Montana before 91. Young isn't bad either, come
> to think of it but all that running lacks finesse.
> 
> Ashu

I mean better than any team this year.  I am not about to compare it with other
teams from other years (though it has nothing to do with the ability or 
execution--I just leave such thigns to the computer simulators.)

					---Chet Zeshonski
From: carrato@acsu.buffalo.edu (Michael Carrato)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Monday Night...FINAL SCORE!
Date: 17 Nov 92 18:04:10 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: UB

yc25+@andrew.cmu.edu (Young-Soo Che) writes:

>First of all, I did make the Bet I,II, or III, because they're stupid. 
>Taking all the bad calls into consideration, I am positive that the
>no-call on the intentional grounding by Jim Kelly, was by far the WORST.

McKeller was about 2 yards from where the ball landed. If he would have
CAUGHT that ball, would you still say it was intentional grounding?

When a receiver is in the area of the ball, intentional grounding
is not called. It was not called on Marino in the first half either,
when Clayton was 10 yards from where Marino threw it away.

Good no call in both cases.


Mike
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: BUFFALO BEATS DOLPHINS 26-20!!!! YES!! YES!!
Originator: delarocq@c00076-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 05:26:23 GMT





   IT IS SUCH AN AWESOME NIGHT!!! THE FISH HAVE FALLEN!! THE FISH HAVE FALLEN!!

   I CAN POST!!! YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!

   FIRST BILLS FAN TO POST THE SCORE... I am proud of all those Bills fans
   who took the BET II.... We are all winners!!!!!!! Congratulations!!!!

   Jim Kelly... 0 INT's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
   Louis Oliver.... 0 INT's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

   Wait for the stats later!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
1988,1989,1990,1991 AFC East Division Champions
1991,1992 AFC Conference Champions

Hungry for some fish.. Monday Night Football, November 16, 1992..

If you are a Buffalo Bills fan, email me at delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu
so we can talk all about the games, insight, etc.
If you are a Packers fan, let me know. I am interested in any news
out of Green Bay...
A PROUD MEMBER OF THE BILLS COALITION TAKING THE BET II.
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dolphins vs. Bills: Poor Calls
Date: 19 Nov 92 05:28:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: uvmark.1992Nov19.052853.34299
Distribution: usa
Organization: VMARK Software, Inc.

In article <BxwAvM.7w@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> wlay@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Radio 90.1 FM WLAY Tarkington Hall) writes:
>Maybe Jimbo was "in the grasp"... but the rule is "grasp AND CONTROL!!"

Wow.. someone from Tarkington Hall...  Lived in Shreve for  awhile myself...

Anyway, Kelly was in the grasp and under the defensive control  He was in
the process of being thrown to the ground...
>
>BTW, I keep hearing about whether the ball was in-bounds when it passed the
>goal line.  Can I get a clarification as to whether or not the ball must 
>cross inside the pylon?  My impression was that the ball is not out-of-bounds
>until it TOUCHES DOWN out of bounds.  If that's the case, neither TT or the
>ball were out of bounds before the ball broke the plane of the goal line, 
>thus giving us an actual BLOWN CALL!!!

The ball must break the plane of the goal line.  That plane stretches between
the two pylons.  If the ball travels outside of the pylons, it is not 
considered a touchdown as it would never have broken the plane...
>
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Ron Steve                         |
>"My views are my own, not those   |        LET'S GO BUFFALO!!!
>of WLAY, Tarkington Hall, and     |    AFC EAST CHAMPS 1988/89/90/91
>especially not those of           |      AFC CHAMPIONS 1990, 1991
>Purdue University!!!"             |
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> 90.1 FM  WLAY  Tarkington Hall -=- "West Lafayette's Get Lucky Radio Station."


-- 
David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Kick of the Day (at least)
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 03:05:15 GMT


A moment ago, the Broncos' PK DeLuiso kicked off after a FG.  He 
immediately raised his arms in triumph.  A moment later the ball
sailed through the uprights for what amounted to a 75-yard field
goal.

I've been watching football for over 20 years now, and I've *never*
seen a kick like this.  Yes, it was in Mile High Stadium, and I
believe there's a bit of wind, but -- sheesh.  

Anyone else ever see anything like this?

-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
From: asl00@ccc.amdahl.com (Andrew Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Looking for stats
Date: 20 Nov 92 21:40:43 GMT
Reply-To: asl00@juts.ccc.amdahl.com (Andrew S. Lee)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

Can anyone tell me a ftp site which has the rosters and schedules
of all NFL teams?  I found one some time ago but forgot the site.
Thanks.



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Lee                             
<asl00@juts.ccc.amdahl.com>
(408)746-8561
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: amr2@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ANTHONY MICHAEL RUTCH)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: BUBBY IS THE MAN!!
Date: 16 Nov 92 18:17:31 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

Welcome back, Bubby!!

How's O'Donnell for next week?
-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Rutch                      Major:  Material Science & Engineering
Brodhead 504                    Campus Box: D-150
758-1393                        Status: JR1
Class of 1994                   STEELERS '92!!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (JONNY B. GOODE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Buffalo at Miami
Date: 16 Nov 92 20:02:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: acsu.Bxtrn4.CpE
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <BxtG4o.4uJ@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v130pwbq@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes...
> 
>If by chance Offerdahl does not play, I would have to pick Buffalo to win.

	Hey!!  No Anti-woofing!!  (;

>One thing I forgot to mention, which Bills fans can clear up, is according to
>the Buffalo paper the Bills defense will most like double, triple, and sometimes
>even have four players defending against Kieth Jackson. 

	What they *said* was that, at different times, they would have four
different people covering Jackson.  Not at the same time, of course, but
different defensive schemes means different people covering him.

>* Eric Orologio " Dr. O"    |


Jon
From: elm@cs.berkeley.edu (ethan miller)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: NFC East loses!
Date: 16 Nov 92 18:26:12
Organization: Berkeley--Shaken, not Stirred
	<1992Nov16.233733.24853@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>
Reply-To: elm@cs.berkeley.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: terrorism.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu's message of Mon, 16 Nov 92 23:37:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.233733.24853@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna) writes:
=>In article <1992Nov16.042424.111667@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, mk0e@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MAHEENDRA BABURAO KASMALKAR) writes:
=>>All teams in NFC East lost today!
=>> 
=>>This doesn't happen everyday. So I am relishing this one chance of a
=>>big WOOF!
=>
=>According to the ESPN Sportscenter dept. this has never before
=>happened.

Not surprising.  There are 20 intra-divisional games in the NFC East,
with a maximum of 2 per week (the same is true for any other 5 team
division).  This takes at least 10 weeks.  If the intra-divisional
matchups are spread out more, with some weekends having only one such
game, there are even fewer weekends when it's even *possible* for all
the NFC teams to lose.

ethan
--
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
ethan miller--cs grad student   | "Anybody not wearing 2000000 sunblock's
elm@cs.berkeley.edu             |  gonna have a REALLY bad day.  GET IT?"
#include <std/disclaimer.h>     |  -- Sarah Connor, _Terminator 2_
From: larimer@cdc.com (Mark D. Larimer)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Status of .....
Date: 19 Nov 92 06:11:23 GMT
Organization: Control Data Systems, Inc.
X-UserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
X-XXMessage-ID: <A7308C3AF002A11B@larimer.cpg.cdc.com>
X-XXDate: Thu, 19 Nov 92 06:11:38 GMT

In article <0f23iUe00WB8J4848W@andrew.cmu.edu> Paul Puglielli, 
pp1r+@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
>
>Does anyone know the status of Hassan Jones of the Vikes and
>Ernie jones of the Cards?  They have not played for the past
>few weeks, but I haven't seen them listed as injured anywhere.

Coach Denny Green said Hassan Jones should play against the Rams
a week from Sunday.

Mark D. Larimer
(Control Data Systems, Inc.) && (University of Minnesota)
Internet: Mark.Larimer@cdc.com

Go Meanies (9-2) !!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: adamfox@b115.super.org (Adam Fox)
Subject: Re: NFC East - Scourge of the league
Organization: Supercomputing Research Center, Bowie, MD  USA
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:11:35 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.202259.4900@u.washington.edu>, ingram@stein.u.washington.edu (Doug Ingram) writes:
|> 
|> 	This past weekend's impressive performance by the NFC East
|> prompted me to compile the following stats:
|> 
|> Week 10 scoring:	NFC East  131
|> 			Opponents  37
|> 
|> 	For the season, the NFC East is now 17-6 against all other
|> teams in the NFL (Phoenix and New York account for 5 of the losses
|> and 5 of the wins, so Dallas, Philly and Washington are 12-1 against
|> everyone else, with the 1 loss being Philly's loss to the Chiefs, if
|> I have my numbers right).

Ahh, what a difference 1 week can make.  Using your numbers, the NFC East 
falls to 17-11 in 1 day! (Going 0-5 yesterday).

Still not a bad record, but only a few weeks from .500!

-- Adam Fox
adamfox@super.org
Still a die-hard Raider fan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gattuso@ssd.comm.mot.com (Christopher Gattuso)
Subject: Re: Darrell and his BOLD Predictions for WEEK 12!
Organization: Motorola LMPS
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:36:38 GMT
Keywords: n

> Green Bay at Chicago: Green Bay by 7. Slappers vs. Slumpers. :)

             Chumps vs Slumps....Pack blows, especially w/o Favre.
             The "need-to-rebuild-now" Bears will take them handly.  That
             just shows how far the Pack has to go.

>Cleveland at Minnesota: Minnesota by 28. They will romp.

	     Go Tzak!!!

>    Washington at N.O.: Washington by 3. N.O. will defend, but can't score!!    
>                        New Orleans needs more offense...

             Washington has NO OFFENSE either, unfortuately, the Saints
	     defense is stellar.  The Redskins are not the team of last
	     year....Saints will come marching in on Monday Night....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
Christopher Gattuso	       "Let's see...you have a semi-daily phone
				call, an implied date on Saturday, and
gattuso@ssd.comm.mot.com	Tampax in your apartment.  Looks to me
Motorola, Inc.			as if you have a girlfriend!!!"
Schaumburg, Illinois			- Seinfeld 	  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: xtifr@netcom.com (Chris Waters)
Subject: Re: Eagle fan commits suicide (Re: 'Gang Green')
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 10:56:36 GMT

In <1992Nov21.163658.15268@doug.cae.wisc.edu> chrisc@cae.wisc.edu (Chris Carey) writes:

>Didn't they do it in '63 also?

Wow, is this like a normal thing?  Eagle fans commit suicide on a
regular basis or something?   :-) :-) :-)
-- 
Chris Waters    | the insane don't | "Don't you boys know NICE songs?"
xtifr@netcom.COM| need disclaimers |                 -- Mrs. Borg
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: aephel01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: doug The Dolfan Update (Was 5-5 BET II VOTE! JIMARCEY SWING VOTE NEEDED
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 13:17:43 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <1992Nov23.005312.17620@ncsu.edu>, delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE) writes:
> 
>  
>   These are the votes so far:

     Sorry to interupt this voting coverage, but the other day
when I gave doug The Dolfan's wife a ride to his cave, I fought
the stench, went inside to give him the news that there is a
vote being held to see if the dolfans that lost the bet could
post again.

     Through various body noises, and body fluid excrements, he
got across his feelings.  He'd bet, he'd lossed, he won't post.  
When I mentioned how some wanted to write to him calling him loser 
he tried to shit on my shoes.

     So, as far as other dolfans are concerned, vote.  But doug
The Dolfan won't be returning this year.  To all the people who
wanted him to come back so they could say Hi Mr. Loser I personaly
would like to say, eat shit you festering warthog's puss-filled
scrotum.  He lost a bet in which he supported his team.  He is
standing by that bet with no problems, (I'm kinda of enjoying it
'cause he can't gainsay anything I post here :) but you want to
be mr big man and call him loser.  What a pathetic excuse for
maggot jiz you are.  And before I get anymore email from bills
fans talkin' bad about the dolphins, I am not a dolfan, so I
probably agree with what ever you're gonna say.  And thanks to
the bills fans with class that replied and mentioned that doug
did post alot of things from fact and not just plain woofing.
I'm sorry to say that any paper we take to him frightens him, so
he hasn't read anything since that fateful night.

     Maybe he'll be back for next year...

-- no sig necessary --
       Aza
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: rules - tackle eligible
From: rx84335@mcvax2.d48.lilly.com (BENVENGA MARK J)
Date: 20 Nov 1992 07:55 EST  
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Lilly Research Laboratories
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    Lines: 19

In article <kowalski.722185801@clouso>, kowalski@crim.ca (Allan Kowalski) writes...
>at the cost of exposing some of my football ignorance exactly
>what does it mean when a team, before a particular play,
>declares a tackle as eligible. I know they refer
>to his being eligible to catch a pass but why do they have to declare
>it. Isn't it automatic if there is no wr or TE on his side
> 
>??????????????????????????????????????/

  A player is not eligible to catch a pass unless he
  is wearing a number which corresponds to an eligible 
  receiver, or reports to the referee so the opposing
  team knows he is eligible.  It is not automatic, it
  is an illegal formation if not reported.

 Mark.

> 
>agk
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
Subject: Re: Jones....Touchdown 49'errrrrrs!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 21:26:53 GMT

In article <By2x6D.7pw@acsu.buffalo.edu> v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...) writes:
 [ text deleted ]

>>can think of who comes close to the Niners is Denver.
>
>Then I suggest you think harder.  I have watched the Niners several times this
>year, and although I think they run a very good two-minute drill, I still find
>it seemingly plodding and seriously lagging when compared with that of the 
>Bills.
>
>>The Bills may run the no-huddle great, but I have yet to see them
>>win a Super Bowl with it.  
>
>And, I have yet to see this year's Niners win a Super Bowl with it either.
>	
Well it is obvious that da Bills so-called, unstoppable offense is
only stoppable by their own inability to sustain it. Da Bills twice
appearance in the SB is an excellent example. The Niners have proved in the
SB, remebmer "The Drive" against the the Bengals, their ability to
run the Niners two-offense in crunch time. Despite Da Bills
no-huddle, no win offense, it is the Niners two-minute performance that is
often mentioned in football circles. Yes, the Da Bills are
mentioned, but frankly, it has proven that in the long run, it has
proven 0 wins in their SB. 

>>Have you ever wondered why they run
>>the no-huddle Chet?  
>
>Yeah.  It further improves an offense with the game's best running back, one of
>its best QBs, a great trio of receivers, and the best O-line in the league.
>
>Any other question?
>
Man, you are one disillusioned dude. I guess you will have to find
out at the end of the season, now wont' we. Better get out your crying 
towels.

>>Have you ever wondered what they may be like
>>if they didn't run it?
>
>Gee, I seem to remember '88 as a pretty good year...
>
Gee, is that when they lost in the SB or did they WIN IT?

>Touche.
>
Double touche!
>>                                                   Tony
>>                                                GO 49ERS!!!
>
>					---Chet Zeshonski


-- 
        ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
 		"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
	       is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
From: un032221@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cowboy Bandwagon
Date: 17 Nov 92 23:29:05 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <1992Nov11.153128.2586@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>, mfiguero@lonestar.utsa.edu (Miguel . Figueroa) writes:
> Stop being crybabies, eagle and redskin fans!  Face it, the Cowboys have
> a better team this year and have already demonstrated that against your
> teams. And no, I'm not a fair-weather fan!  You guys should join LA-->
> Losers Anonymous, maybe Patriots and Seahawks fans can show you how to
> cope with being losers!
> 
> Mike
> 
	This is really sad.  Look, last year the Skins had UNARGUABLY the best
team out there.  Did I, even ONCE pick on the Cowboy fans about how much better
my team was than theirs?  No.  So, now that the Redskins are in the shitter, do
the Cowboy fans return the favor?  No.  This jackoff thinks I don't realise
that my team isn't going to win the SB this year, and will, in fact, be
fortunate to get to the playoffs as the #2WC, much less as the division
titlist.  I know the Cowboys are a virtual lock on the division at this point,
but so were the Redskins at this point last season.  More so in fact since the
Skins were undefeated at this point last year.  But can Cowboy fans handle the
success?  No.  Apparently not.  Sometimes I think the only fans cockier are
Bills fans.  But, I can handle your trite woofing, since chances are, only a
few years down the road, the Redskins will probably be back on top, for at
least one Sb run year.  But, I won't brag then either.  I prefer to just sit
back, and watch my favorite team win/lose with quiet dignity, rather than watch 
a team win, and then get all happy, and start pointing fingers like Buddy's
Kids when he was around.  It all will come back to you Cowboys fans.  You are
on top this year, but even IF you become the team of the 90's, there will be
years that Washington wins.  There will be years that Philly wins.  There will
be years that Ny wins.  Instead of woofing when you're on top, instead just
watch, with a silent glow, and realise that as good as it feels, it is better
to be silent since eventually your team will be substandard, and any woofing
you do now will come back at you three-fold.
	-Skins fan that didn't woof unreasonably last year.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro