HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: m14494@mwvm.mitre.org (Mike White)
Subject: Re: "Future Site of Starfleet HQ"
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 15:40:31 GMT

Morris Jones writes:
> I thought the STIV movie poster was hilarious by the way.  Ask a San
> Franciscan "what's wrong with this picture?" and he'll look at it for a
> moment and say, "It's backwards!"  :)  It's a mirror image view of San
> Francisco from Marin.

No, no... it will really look that way.  See, in 2375, there's this
accident where Kirk's ego overloads the warp field core while
he's admiring himself in a mirror.  The whole universe flips
right to left, and the Federation constitution is changed to 
require all future Presidents to be ambidexterous, since they
figure with Kirk around, this sort of thing will be happening
all the time.  This presents no problems at all for the politicians,
who are already adept at talking out of both sides of their
mouths, and at not letting their right hand know who's pocket
their left hand is in.

************************
* These are my opinions only.*
************************
From: brownga@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Who Might Play Sisco?
Date: 31 Aug 92 00:29:59 CDT
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <1992Aug26.014102.28081@tc.cornell.edu>, jfe@alchemy.tn.cornell.edu (Brian Chung) writes:
> In article <JKE.92Aug22074950@shadrach.math.ufl.edu> jke@math.ufl.edu (Jeffery Eddings) writes:
>>Here are my ponderings on this:
>>
>>1.  Robert Guillame:  Isn't he balding yet?  ;)  Actually, I think
>>"Benson" would be a great choice, seeing as he hasn't done anything
>>recently, and wouldn't ask for a lot of money, yet he's rather
>>well-known.
> 
> 	Isn't he doing the Phantom of the Opera in LA, though?
> 
>>
>>
>>Anyway, hopefully they'll make a good choice.  When you think of Star
>>Trek, you automatically think of Captain Kirk, and when ST:TNG comes
>>up, Picard is usually mentioned, so it's obvious how important the
>>role of the commander is.
> 
> 	Okay, here's my real pick:  Sherman Helmsley.  He's bald and 
> successful in other series.  8)
>>
>>--Jeffery
> 
> 
> -- 
> T. H. Brian Chung                      | IRC nick: Idaho
> Internet: jfe@alchemy.tn.cornell.edu   | You can find me sitting at my desk
> Bitnet: jfe@cornella                   | drinking Earl Grey tea.
> DECnet: lns62::thc                     | 
-- 
Hey. Hey ,Hey.    Iv posted this before, didn't anyone receive?
Its Charles S. Dutton Charles S. Dutton Charles S. Dutton
Has anyone saw the show Roc on Fox Tv or he was in Alien3.
I may be wrong but he would make a good choice.
****************************************************************
* Gregory Brown, Computer Science Dept.*OOOOOOOOO My computer  *
* Western Kentucky University          *BIT me and boy did it  *
* E-Mail Brownga@Wkuvx1.bitnet         *take a big BYTE!       *
****************************************************************
From: faigin@aero.org (Daniel P. Faigin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Deep Space Nine on ET
Date: 3 Sep 92 10:03:14
Organization: The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA
Distribution: na
	<1992Sep3.165355.28727@u.washington.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: soldan.aero.org
In-reply-to: gwangung@milton.u.washington.edu's message of Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:53:55 GMT

On Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:53:55 GMT, gwangung@milton.u.washington.edu (Just
another theatre geek.....) said: 

> Brooks and Auberjois are very, very good, fairly well known people (in
> particular, I suspect the latter has no real financial need to do series
> work, given his work on BENSON).

Not to mention Auberjois's work in the professional theatre: he was a principle
in both City of Angels and Big River.

Daniel
--
[W]:The Aerospace Corp. M1/055 * POB 92957 * LA, CA 90009-2957 * 310/336-8228
[Email]:faigin@aerospace.aero.org              [Vmail]:310/336-5454 Box#13149
   "You can't be a rationalist in an irrational world. It isn't rational!"
	       Dr. Rance, in Joe Orton's "What the Butler Saw"
From: bbarber@sierra.com (Bryan Barber)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Scotty
Keywords: fat Fat FAT
Date: 3 Sep 92 14:26:15 GMT
Followup-To: r.a.s.fat
Organization: Sierra Geophysics, North Dallas Technology Ctr.

Kellie Matthews-Simmons writes this in response to someone's "Scotty's 
fat" posting:

>Grrr!  Are we starting in with the FAT comments again?  How tall are _you_ and
>how much do _you_ weigh?  As i've said before, people come in LOTS of sizes, 
>not just one.  Cool it!  

What's your size, Kellie? (Unwarranted jab)

But seriously, folks, we don't watch TV/Movies to see fat people. We
(America) watch to see beautiful people with perfect bodies. That's 
showbiz!!

Now, let's see a few more hot babes on ST. :-)
-- 
Bryan Barber  |"He's bread, Jim." - McCoy after a tragic transporter accident
              |                     while visiting planet Pillsbury.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Whatever happened to..?
From: lpfaig@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu
Date: 31 Aug 92 21:32:38 -0500
Organization: Miami University Academic Computer Service"

Can anyone tell me what happened to Kirk by the time of the TNG?
Has he ever really been mentioned? (Besides in 'Unification')
I may have missed it somewhere


Thanks!
From: gbrach@galaxy.gov.bc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Who was hot on ST: TNG
Date: 28 Aug 92 14:07:32 -0700
Organization: BC Systems Corporation

In article <1992Aug28.192704.29368@gtech.com>, smp@gtech.com (Sergio M. Pedro) writes:
> 	Forget all of the women named up to this point.  Does anyone
> recall the first season episode "Angel One"?  Well, Mistress Biada (?) is
> one pretty lady.  Lucky for Riker, huh?  I don't know who played her, but
> she looks kind of familiar?  Does anyone know who she is and where she
> might be from?
> 
> Does the song "California Dreaming" ring any bells for you???  Yes indeed
> this bodacious babe is none other than the 40+ year old Michelle Phillips.
> IMHO her daughter still has a long way to go to catch up with the original!
> 
> Sincerely,
> SMP

BZZZZZZZZT! Wrong!
But thanks for playing.

I've no idea who played the Mistress Bianca in the episode "Angel one", but
Michelle Phillips starred as a former flame of JLP's in "We'll Always Have 
Paris".

BTW, MP gets my vote hands down...

LL&P,
Gabor.

-- 
    g  b    gbrach@galaxy.gov.bc.ca	"We come in Peace, shoot to kill,
gggg   b    Victoria, B. C.	 	 We come in Peace, shoot to kill, men"
g  g t b    (God's waiting room)		_Star Trekking_, The Firm
ggggtttbbbb  
   g t b  b 		"Am I the witness, or am I the crime
g  g t bbbb		 A victim of circumstance, or just a sign of the times"
gggg  tt        				J. Clegg
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: Rannou@info.polymtl.ca (Patrick Rannou)
Subject: Re: YIKES!  The cross-over show is actually going to happen!!
Organization: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Canada
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 10:27:31 GMT

In article <mike02383920726192139@batpad.lgb.ca.us> mike@batpad.lgb.ca.us (mike batchelor) writes:


   I saw on (I think) Entertainment Tonight last night that the TOS/TNG
   cross-over show is going to air early in the 6th season!

   James Doohan was interviewed for it, and they showed the set of the
   OLD TOS Enterprise bridge, which had been reconstructed for this
   episode.  This is not the fancy bridge from the movies, this is the
   ancient-looking red-rail bridge from the TV series.

   Details were not forthcoming, but the Enterprise (presumably the pre-A
   Big E) takes a little trip forward in time and meets the E-D and their
   crew.  I only caught the last part of the segment, but my roommate
   tells me that DeForrest, Nichelle and Shatner will be appearing in it.
   He didn't know if Nimoy would be in it also.

   Doohan described his role in it briefly as the save-the-ship person,
   only this time he helps Geordi save the E-D, in some sort of plot
   which he would not tell about further.


Now, I REALLY wonder if they'll show the old enterprise with all it's
old looking "computer" pictures and "beeping sounds" like in the old serie,
or will use newer stuff.

It would be real fun to feel the good old times again.

"Kirk to Enterprise" (comunicator sound)  <chuk-chuk chuck>

(main bridge)  <beep bedooo poing>


Uhura: (STILL at communications) "An unknown ship is hailing us, using very
high frequencies..."

(Spock) "Fascinating!"


;-)

--
/---------------------------\
| Patrick "Paradak" Rannou. |
| Rannou@info.polymtl.ca    |
\---------------------------/
From: Peter_A_David@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: PAD
Date: Fri,  4 Sep 92 05:50:56 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world
  <1992Aug30.043315.18194@morgan.ucs.mun.ca>
  <1992Sep3.192532.5689@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>

I dunno.  I heard Peter David hates everybody.

PAD
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: bk134@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Keith William Bowes)
Subject: Re: Somehow, I missed SOMETHING??
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 16:45:18 GMT


mmadsen@eecs.umich.edu (Martin Madsen) writes:

>   Someone *PLEASE* Help me.  I was working on Saturdays, and I missed
>most of last season's Episodes... If someone could post a summary of
>each new episode, or e-mail me, or at least tell me where I can get a
>summary via magazine/book I would REALLY appreciate it.

 _Cinefantastique_ (magazine) October issue has a quick review of
each season 5 episode along with a lot of other great stuff
regarding TNG.

>   Also, I REALLY missed something big... What was the Season Fanalie
>(sp) about??? (I know, I know, but I was working... :(.. ).  Sometimes
>I really feel stupid for ever workin Saturday nights.  Also, Is there
>going to be a rerun of the Finalie before the Premiere?

 You really are lost. :)
Why not just watch it? Yes, Times Arrow I (season 5 cliffhanger)
will be shown one week before the premeire of Times Arrow II

Times Arrow I   14 September - 20 September
Times Arrow II  21 September - 27 September

>Confused, lost,
>Regretting working Saturdays,
>Missed most of the ST:TNG seasons,
>Who's Q???

 I'll let someone else handle that one! :)
From: cegtitd@prism.gatech.EDU (Tim Dodd)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Season 6 opener: The Enterprise vs Q for the sanity of Rebecca DeMorney
Date: 3 Sep 92 18:25:56 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <1992Sep2.180905.27301@tin.monsanto.com) lesnyd@monsanto.com (Larry E. Snyder) writes:
)In article <67494@hydra.gatech.EDU), cegtitd@prism.gatech.EDU (Tim Dodd) writes:
)) 
)) In article <BtyEGp.JM2@acsu.buffalo.edu) v129j6ed@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (This is F.U.N.) writes:
)) )The crew are flung to the late 20th century and battle Q to save the mind
)) )and life of Rebecca DeMorney's character in The Hand That Rocks the Cradle.
)) )Q's plan was to wipe out Picard before he ever existed, and that his
)) )ancestory has a key point with her. 
)) 
)) How can this be?  How can the Enterprise crew not only travel into the past,
)) but into a *fictional* past?  Furthermore, how can Picard's origin be some-
)) how tied up in this fictitious past?
)) 
)
)Ah, don't you see? By going into the *fictional* past instead of the *actual*
)past the crew doesn't have to worry about messing up the future, since the
)future for the *fictional* past is the *fictional* future. And since that
)future doesn't exist, you can mess with it all you want and it's still OK.
)
)And, just to be creative, they also meet *actual* people in the *fictional*
)past, like Mark Twain, and as long as they don't affect the *actual* future,
)they can use *actual* people all they want to change the *fictional* future.
)And, I guess, they can use *fictional* people to affect the *actual* future,
)so long as it's what it is, since they can't mess with that.
)
)Is that clear? ;^)

Ah, I understand now.  I think what you're saying is that the past depicted
in TA I is *fictional*, and that the *actual* people portrayed therein are
really *fictional* representations thereof.  To carry your reasoning further,
they can use the *fictional* *actual* people to affect either the *fictional*
*actual* future, or the *actual* *fictional* future.  Now, are the *fictional*
characters created by the *fictional* *actual* Mark Twain *fictional* *actual*
*fictional* characters, or just *fictional* *fictional* characters?  Or, if
we can assume that these characters are the same as the ones created by
the *actual* Mark Twain, then they are *actual* *fictional* characters, whereas
their creator is *fictional* *actual*.  Does this mean that the *actual*
*fictional* characters created by the *fictional* *actual* Mark Twain are
more real than their creator?

Tim :-)
-- 
"Truth is under all circumstances more valuable than nontruth, and this
must apply to truth in the realm of history as to other kinds of truth."
  -- Albert Schweitzer, _Out of My Life and Thought_
Tim Dodd, Research Scientist, Georgia Tech  cegtitd@prism.gatech.edu
From: jsnell@ocf.berkeley.edu (Jason Snell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: STTNG Season SIX Broadcast Schedule
Date: 29 Aug 1992 19:31:58 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandstorm.berkeley.edu

In article <8322@orbit.cts.com> chris@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Chris Jacobson) writes:
>
>Ep    Date      PC   Stardate      Title
>----  --------  ---  ------------  -----------------------------------------
>127.  09/19/92  227                Time's Arrow II
>128.  09/26/92  228                Realm of Fear
 Sounds like a comic book. But interesting.

>129.  10/03/92  229                Man of the People
 Always wanted to see Jim Garner in a TNG episode. (Get it?)

>130.  10/10/92  230                Relics
>131.  10/17/92  231                Schisms
>132.  10/24/92  232                Q-Me
 So which Q episode is this? The duelling Q episode, or the other one?

TNG Five-Season Poll coming soon, by the way. Stay tuned. And yes, I'm
back on r.a.s. after a summer away....

-jason

-- 
  Jason Snell / jsnell@ocf.berkeley.edu / Cal Graduate School of Journalism
 InterText: A Net Fiction Magazine - ASCII or PostScript - Mail me for info!
            "I thought for a second that my monkey had rabies --
   It turned out he had just gotten into the Cool Whip." -- Dave Letterman
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu (Jeffrey S. Jo)
Subject: Scotty on TNG *Spoiler*
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 16:14:35 GMT


























Well, here it is.
I saw a small segment of what most people saw on CNN, but according to the
local Fox affiliate in Omaha (Fox 42 KPTM), Scotty drinks something that he
really shouldn't have, and sleeps for 75 years.  Hmmm, shouldn't he be
older still?  He looked like he was in his uniform that he wore in the movies,
and was walking around the bridge of the Old Enterprise holding some type of
container with some liquid in it. 

-- 
|Jeffrey S. Jo                  |	       U.S.S. Enterprise              |
|Computer Operations		| Galaxy Class - Starfleet Registry NCC-1701-D|
|University of Nebraska at Omaha|        Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards, Mars    |
|tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu        |             Launched Stardate 40759.5       |
From: gbrach@galaxy.gov.bc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: The Dancing teacher (Was:  WHO IS HOTTER...)
Date: 28 Aug 92 11:37:40 -0700
Organization: BC Systems Corporation

> In article <Bto84C.4qn@news.cso.uiuc.edu> cjp53999@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Cory James Padfield) writes:
>>
>>Also, Data's dance partner
>>when he needed to learn how to dance with Keiko was VERY good looking.
>>These are about all I can think of. Responses, except for flames of course,
>>are welcome.
>>
> I thought Data's dance partner was Denise Crosby because he sort of had
> a thing for her.  It looked a lot like her.

If you mean the woman who gave Data dancing lessons in "Data's Day", that was
none other than "the Dancing Docter" herself:  Beverly Crusher.  She teaches
Data to tap dance before he tells her that he wants to prepare to dance at the
wedding.

Ciao.
Gabor.

-- 
    g  b    gbrach@galaxy.gov.bc.ca	"We come in Peace, shoot to kill,
gggg   b    Victoria, B. C.	 	 We come in Peace, shoot to kill, men"
g  g t b    (God's waiting room)		_Star Trekking_, The Firm
ggggtttbbbb  
   g t b  b 		"If I had a rocket launcher
g  g t bbbb		 If I had a rocket launcher,
gggg  tt        	 some son of a bitch would die"  B. Cockburn
From: edc@evolution.bchs.uh.edu (edward s. chen)
Subject: Re: Review of "Imzadi" by Peter David - numero
Organization: Little to none, or maybe not......
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 22:08:23 GMT

In article <1992Aug28.192540.19890@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> stanaway@ssd.comm.mot.com writes:
>In article 448@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU, ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin) writes:
>>For instance, according to the Technical Manual, Enterprise-D is
>>supposed to have a lifespan of 100 years.  It's replacement twice over
>>seems too fast for me.  (Unless Peter thinks both were destroyed of
>>course, he doesn't say, and of course, the Tech Manual isn't *completely*
>>canon)
>
>Here's an idea...the time from the commission of the original E to the
>commission of E-D is approx. 100 years (better number somebody?).  So,
>in 100 years we go through 4 E's, or approx. averaging 25 years each.
>This crude explanation could be what Peter was going by.  If the later
>models of the E lasted longer then 25 years, then it's concevieble, with
>this explanation, that the E-F is in use.
>

Conversely, it is possible that (for whatever reason), the Federation's
flagship should *always* be named Enterprise, so when the first starship
of the "better-than-Galaxy-class" was commisioned, it became the Enterprise,
NCC-1701-E, while the Galaxy class vessel became NCC-xxxx, the USS KIRK
(or somesuch).

<ESC>



-- 
..You either kiss the future or the past goodbye...
                          -- Ringo Starr (written by O'Deherty / Velez)
From: kuchar@buast7.bu.edu (Tom Kuchar)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: ST II: Wrath of Khan --> New Footage
Date: 26 Aug 92 11:36:49 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article<14278@auspex-gw.auspex.com> hcheng@Auspex.COM (Howard Cheng) writes:
>That's odd.  I have (copy of) the laserdisc and I remember seeing all of those
>scenes in the movie.  Nowhere on the disc does (did) it say that there was
>added footage, or footage not scene in the theaters.
>

Which version of the LD? I have the 25th anniversary wide screen
pressing.  No added scenes are included there.  As fas as I knew
the added scenes were never released on video (LD or tape).




-- 
Tom Kuchar			  
kuchar@buast7.bu.edu		  -or-                      kuchar@plh.af.mil
Department of Astronomy		                     Phillips Laboratory/GPOB
Boston Univerity		                                  Hanscom AFB
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: stanaway@ssd.comm.mot.com (Chris Stanaway)
Subject: Re: warp drive and other 10-step scales (s
Reply-To: stanaway@ssd.comm.mot.com
Organization: Motorola LMPS
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 14:42:00 GMT

In article 25374@castle.ed.ac.uk, sss@castle.ed.ac.uk (S S Sturrock) writes:
>In article <1992Sep1.000849.11825@unocal.com> stgprao@st.unocal.COM (Richard Ottolini) writes:
>>
>>Sometimes when I am driving, I image my speedometer to be a warp scale
>>(10 mph = 1 warp step).  Free way cruising is around warp 6 or 7.
>>Passing speed is around warp 8 or 9.  Maximum velocity of my auto is
>>around warp 10, but I've never tried it.
>
>I thought everyone did this?
>
>Besides which, I thought cars in the US had speedometers that only go up to
>90 or so (at least the Delorean in BTTF did), my BMW goes up to 140
>although I am sure the car won't, it has done 115 though, so warp 11.5,
>oops, not possible, oh well, back to the drawing board.

Speedometers in cars in the US vary.  Some go up to 85, others 180.  My
Saturn goes up to 140.  It depends on the type of car (economy vs sports)
and the manufacturer.

Chris
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: Charles Laine <Charles_Laine@CCIS.BAYLOR.EDU>
Subject: Re: Season Spoiler: Q reverses time!!!
Organization: Baylor University
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1a2
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 15:26:16 GMT
X-Posted-From: lainec.baylor.edu
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

Who's to say time is not already running backwards.
We wouldn't know it if it were.

Charles Laine
Baylor University
From: odlin@reed.edu (Iain Odlin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Problem with Scotty being on TNG
Date: 1 Sep 92 15:57:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Sep1.155747.28417
Organization: The Stuffed Animal Trauma Team  (We're Trained Professionals)

In article <31AUG199216012452@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov> afdenis@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (Stephen Dennison) writes:
>In article <1992Aug28.132046.28465@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, kanamori@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Atsushi Kanamori) writes...
>>In article <1992Aug27.220939.9036@bsu-ucs.uucp> 00jdbecktel@bsu-ucs.uucp writes:
>>>I also have an Irk with this theory about Scotty being on TNG.
>>>Isn't he just too fat to be on network television.
>                                 ^^^^^^^
>>Ah. Bigotry.
>Nawwww, he would just rather see him in THINdication. :-)

  *sigh*  This is obviously an overSLIMplification of the magnitude of this
  weighty problem.

  ;)
-- 
 --------------------------------- Iain Odlin ---------------------------------
                  10 Crosby Street, Level 3, Portland ME 04103
                                 odlin@reed.edu
 ----------------- "The living are just the dead on holiday." -----------------
From: hlj@posix.COM (Hal Jespersen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Shatner on Larry Sanders
Date: 27 Aug 92 18:44:24 GMT
Organization: POSIX Software Group, Redwood City, CA

I'm surprised someone hasn't mentioned this already, so here goes.

I was very pleased to hear the Shatner voice cameo on Larry Sanders
[HBO] this week.  Shatner was supposed to be a guest on Sanders'
[Gary Shandling] show and he was on the speakerphone to the staff
planning the show.  The humorous part I remember [not verbatim;
I didn't record it for transcription] was where Larry wants to
hear Shatner say "Klingon":

	Larry:  And who was the enemy in Star Trek, Bill?

	Shatner:  Well, there were some problems with Deforest Kelly...

	L:  No, no, the alien race!

	S:  Well, let's see...  There were the Romulans... [pause]
	    and the salt lickers... and the Klingons

Catch it if you can.  The series is VERY funny.  Recommended even when
ST folks aren't involved.

Hal
From: tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu (Jeffrey S. Jo)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Who was hot on ST: TNG
Date: 27 Aug 92 22:53:55 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha


	Forget all of the women named up to this point.  Does anyone
recall the first season episode "Angel One"?  Well, Mistress Biada (?) is
one pretty lady.  Lucky for Riker, huh?  I don't know who played her, but
she looks kind of familiar?  Does anyone know who she is and where she
might be from?

-- 
|Jeffrey S. Jo                  |	       U.S.S. Enterprise              |
|Computer Operations		| Galaxy Class - Starfleet Registry NCC-1701-D|
|University of Nebraska at Omaha|        Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards, Mars    |
|tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu        |             Launched Stardate 40759.5       |
From: tgunter@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Thomas Gunter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Season Premiere
Date: 26 Aug 92 14:54:18 GMT
Organization: Not Necessarily The University of Texas at Austin

How about giveing Wesley a new show catering to young teens?
We can call it Deep Space 90210.

Or Bill Shatner in a show about extra-terrestrial cops?
Obviously called Deep Space 911.

Sorry--it was a boring summer...

-tag
-- 
Thomas A. Gunter                   | There are three types of people
tgunter@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu         | in the world:  those who are
Aerospace Engineering              | good at math and those who aren't.
The University of Texas at Austin  |