HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: vestrada@sal-sun132.usc.edu (Victor Estrada)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: academics
Date: 11 Apr 1992 17:12:41 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: sal-sun132.usc.edu

In article <8APR199212270802@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov> acdendy@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (ROGER DENDY) writes:

>Not only is it off the topic of football, it's not really a relevant 
>argument.  I don't buy the assertion that schools align with conferences 
>for academic purposes.  That's why they're called ATHLETIC conferences.  
>Reasons for big-time sports include name recognition and gross income, which 
>come with winning on the field and with extensive media exposure.  These 
>are considerations in joining an athletic conference.

>R Dendy

I'm not so sure about this.  About two years ago, there was a rumor about the 
PAC-10 expanding to add some schools.  Supposedly, San Diego State was turned
down because their academics were not as "good" as the othe PAC schools.  
Also, there was talk about Texas and Texas A&M joining the PAC because
both happen to be very good academic schools.  In the end, the PAC-10
decided to stay 10.  

Anyone else hear anything about this?

					Victor Estrada
==========================================================================
-- 
   				Victor Estrada  (vestrada@usc.edu) 

"Death to the message of the Ku Klux Klan"--Red Hot Chili Peppers
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Big 8(KSU schedule)
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:40:57 CST
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Distribution: world
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


I finally got ahold of one Big8 schedule.....

S19 Montana 6:30
S26 Temple  6:30
O 3 NewMexicoSt 12:30
O10 @KU 1
O17 @UtahSt 1
O24 @CU tba
O31 @OU 1 (whine time, when oh when will they play here)
N 7 ISU 1:10
N14 @MU 1
N21 OSU 1:10
D 6 NU (@Tokyo) tba

Gallon, KSU's RB, looks to be lost for the year.  Wrecked his
knee in Spring ball.
--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mln@icase.edu (Michael Nelson)
Subject: Re: Hokie/Gobbler - the REAL answer
Organization: ICASE/NASA Langley
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 19:16:11 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.180100.14135@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>, blance@author.ecn.purdue.edu (Brian J Lance) writes:
>In article <1992Apr14.152304.20832@walter.bellcore.com> kevink@fugitive.soac.bellcore.com (Kevin Klinge) writes:
>>
>>BTW Charlie, you are right about our mascot needing a new costume. I'll 
>>grant you that.  I personally liked the one before that existed in the 
>>mid-80's.
>>
>
>No way, IMHO, the current Hokie bird is the best of all the ones I have
>seen in the past. The worst ever was that one back in the early 80's-
>late 70's where he had a really long neck. Now THAT was embarressing.
>The new one is cool because he is like a powerful strong turkey (if that
>can exist).  :)
>
>
I agree with Brian.  Apparently, Brian and I are the only ones that like 
the new hokie bird.  Even if you don't like the actual mascot, on paper
it looks neater than the previous silhouette of a *real* turkey (not very
impressive...)  The new "muscular" turkey (with arms crossed etc.) can
be personalized by diff groups (ie, the ROTC has the turkey dressed in
fatigues)  I think its pretty cool.  as far as turkeys go.

Michael Nelson

>>-- 
>>
>>Kevin H. Klinge
>>
>> \\\\    ////////////////////////      ||||\\      //||||
>>  \\\\  ////////////////////////        |||\\\    ///|||
>>   \\\\////       /////                 ||| \\\  /// |||
>>    \\\///       /////                  |||  \\\///  |||
>>     \\//       /////                  |||||  \\//  |||||
>
>
>Brian Lance
>Va Tech, 1990
>Purdue, 1992
>
>  \\\\    ////////////////////////      ||||||||||||
>   \\\\  ////////////////////////        |||     |||
>    \\\\////       /////                 |||||||||||
>     \\\///       /////                  |||
>      \\//       /////                  ||||| 
>
>Nice copy, huh! Just for this, don't worry, I'm not going to
>steal your .sig
From: gws6860@tamsun.tamu.edu (Gary Wayne "Goober" Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: SWC (was Re: 1992 Bowl matchups)
Date: 10 Apr 92 15:25:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station

In article <1992Apr9.220737.13945@colorado.edu> manu@tigger.Colorado.EDU (Njan) writes:
--what's a goober?

If you have to ask, then you are a goober.  Welcome to the club.

- goober (parenthetically blank today) smith

-- 
Racism Sucks!
From: stricher@masig3.ocean.fsu.edu (Char Aznabul)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: SWC (was Re: 1992 Bowl matchups)
Date: 9 Apr 92 02:44:57 GMT
Distribution: na

James D. Oliver III writes
+ 
+ Screw this "join another conference" bullcorn.  The problem with the SWC
+ is, obviously, that there aren't *enough* teams from Texas!  Now *this*
+ what I call a real football conference:

+ College Bowl Division:
+ 	UH

Cougar High? Maybe in highschool division Ia football...

James
From: mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: ANYONE INTERESTED IN GATORS' SCHEDULE
Keywords: Fightin' Gators, 92 Schedule
Date: 13 Apr 92 00:23:13 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Ramblin' Wrecks from Georgia Tech

Jason Fawcett wrote:
}
} From Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. Sun-Sentinel Friday 11/30/90
}
} UF's Steve Spurs said, " Florida will honor its agreement to play Miami
} in 1992-1993.  We'll stick with it and see what happens." 

Wow, Jason, this *is* fresh and exciting news!  Could you maybe post it
400 *more* times?  Thanks in advance.

(Oh, and please don't overburden our intellects with the fact that the SEC
added an 8th conference game (which Florida voted against) after Spurrier
said this, that would only confuse the issue.)

-- 
"Laugh while you can, monkey boy!"    | Mark Mitchell, Ga. Tech, Atlanta, GA
                                      | mm42@prism.gatech.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mln@icase.edu (Michael Nelson)
Subject: Re: Turkey Dinners (Re: Hokie/Gobbler - the REAL answer)
Organization: ICASE/NASA Langley
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 13:04:52 GMT

Charlie writes:

>The Cavalier said
>they were just playing around and the guy fell - the Turtle claims
>that the Cavalier got a little rough. I guess we'll never know. 

Well, I'd believe a turtle over a french guy any day.

>The incident still comes
>up whenever we play Maryland. 

The last couple of years, it would appear that they have gotten
their revenge.

Michael Nelson
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mln@icase.edu (Michael Nelson)
Subject: Re: SWC (was Re: 1992 Bowl matchups)
Organization: ICASE/NASA Langley
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:57:36 GMT

rbutera@sawwhet.owlnet.rice.edu (Rob Butera) writes:

>Back when I was at GT and we played Virginia Tech, there was a bit of campus
>folklore that said that a Hokie (I think that's what they're called) is
>really a castrated turkey.  Is this true, or just another piece for the
>storybooks?  Someday I'll bother looking it up ...

some say that, but for some reason, I always heard a hokie 
was a kick-ass turkey.  perhaps this has something to do 
with the company I kept...

as I posted before, the real meaning behind "hokie"
comes from a stupid fight song written 80 years ago 
or something with just a bunch of nonsense words
thrown together (along with "lets go VPI" at the end)

its real funny - they play the fight song at every game
and no one know the words - they all sort of mumble
along until they get to the "lets go VPI" part.  quite humorous.

>Wow - another four months of discussions such as these ....

well...Va Tech's spring fb game was over a couple of days
ago.  I don't have the ariticles with me, but I'll post a recap
to complement Charlie's and others who have posted such.

Michael Nelson
From: crs@milton.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: University of TN '92 Football Schedule
Date: 17 Apr 92 16:39:14 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

briboy writes:
>
>    May I ask who doesn't think of Alabama as the biggest game on their 
>schedule?

Umm, how about the 96 division I teams which don't play Alabama next year 
for starts?

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *  Earn cash in your spare time!
University of Washington      *  Blackmail your friends.
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
From: manu@tigger.Colorado.EDU (Njan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: SWC (was Re: 1992 Bowl matchups)
Date: 10 Apr 92 21:27:40 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder

In article <12149@tamsun.tamu.edu> gws6860@tamsun.tamu.edu (Gary Wayne "Goober" Smith) writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.220737.13945@colorado.edu> manu@tigger.Colorado.EDU (Njan) writes:
>--what's a goober?
>
>If you have to ask, then you are a goober.  Welcome to the club.

and to think that I thought there aren't any goobers in Colorado!!!
I hope there isn't any membership fee... I can't afford it!

Njan
From: navarrer@bionette.CGRB.ORST.EDU (Roy Navarre -- Botany and Plant Pathology)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: SWC (was Re: 1992 Bowl matchups/SEC)
Date: 6 Apr 92 21:23:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: talon.1992Apr6.212301.26324
Distribution: na
Organization: Biological Computing Consortium, OSU, Corvallis, OR.

In article <11867@tamsun.tamu.edu> gws6860@tamsun.tamu.edu (Gary Wayne "Goober" Smith) writes:
>In article <1992Apr5.075559.22380@talon.ucs.orst.edu> navarrer@bionette.CGRB.ORST.EDU (Roy Navarre -- Botany and Plant Pathology) writes:
>--In article <11837@tamsun.tamu.edu> gws6860@tamsun.tamu.edu (Gary Wayne "Goober" Smith) writes:
>-->While LSU would certainly be a great team to add for athletics, there are
>-->other things to think about...like who you want to be associated with...
>-->perhaps you haven't known as many LSU alums as I have.
>--
>--OK gary! Wouldnt want to let you down. As a LSU alum I realize that the deep
>--seated hatred of LSU by many Aggies stems from LSU's lopsided dominance in
>--head to head athletic competition. LSU creamed A&M more often than not. I 
>--remember watching national announcers laughing at how dominating LSU had
>--been in the matchups with A&M--laughing in part at how pissed of aggie fans
>--were. Yes you will point to A&M wins these last two years, when LSU has had
>--its worst team in over a decade. However we have the #1 recruiting class in
>--the country this year--ie the natural order of things will soon be restored.
>--By the way what is A&Ms record vs the SEC in the 80s????????????????
>--*LAUGHING HARD*
>
>Roy, Roy, Roy...you just don't get it do you?  Let me repeat myself:
>  "While LSU would certainly be a great team to add for athletics..."
>
>Now, doesn't that sorta sound like I agree with you?  Now that you have
>an Aggie for a coach, I expect LSU to continue to be good.
>
>Maybe if you would stop *LAUGHING so HARD*, pull your head out of your ass,
>and try to be a little more coherent in your postings you might not be the 
>laughing stock of rec.sport.*.college and I might stop baiting you.
>
>- gary (net.freshmanism runs amuck) smith
>
>-- 
>Racism Sucks!

Same old Gary I see. You ignored the point of my post which was academics--and
an explanation of why the aggies dislike LSU. I asked you to name the SEC schools
which are weak in academics. Well?      

But I must say boy did you sure show me huh? Man thats telling me! OUCH!
Its nice to see you ignore the facts and a rational response and resort to
Mickey Mouse name calling. But hey, Its the GOOBER, I'm dealing with.
Why am I not surprised?
Roy "suggests people take logic classes" Navarre
From: tbn0931@zeus.tamu.edu (NORTH, TOM-C)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: SWC (was Re: 1992 Bowl matchups)
Summary: (IS IT YOUR DECISION?)
Date: 17 Apr 92 18:03:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr3.031811.24254@talon.ucs.orst.edu>, navarrer@bionette.CGRB.ORST.EDU (Roy Navarre -- Botany and Plant Pathology) writes...
>What makes you think the SEC would take A&M?  The SEC got the school they
** flame on **
	Arkansas sucks roadkill through a straw.
** flame off **
	Who are you to say that the SEC wouldn't want A&M. They beat the tar out
	of Arkansas last season , if you forgot. I'm not saying that A&m should 
	or would want to get into the SEC. It doesn't bother me a bit whether
	or not the stay in the SWC.
>wanted, Arkansas. Possibly they might be interested in Texas--but A&M? No way.
	Texas??? - they got killed by Mississippi State, A&M and a few others.
	I have a friend from U.T. who even thinks thier football team was 
	terrible. Anyway, who had one of the best recruiting seasons in the
	nation this year? A&M, that's who...
>As it stands now the SWC is a very weak conference.  A&M would get killed in

>
NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>the SEC.  Miami bypassed the SEC because they did'nt want to have to play such
>a tough schedule every year.  Only an aggie would wish that kind of punishment
>on his team. Your baseball team would also find the going xtra tough. And the
>rest of your sports program would finish in last place. Granted you have had
>a good football team these last 2 years--middle of the pac if they were in the
>SEC.  PAC 10 would be a good conference because it is a weak conference. UCLA
>USC football--hoh hum, hoh hum. Basketball? WAY WAY overrated. It makes sense
>to have the aggies in a conference called the Pacific conference--given how
>close A&M is to the pacific. Somehow the fact that it would be the aggies makes
>that non-sequitur meaningful.
>regards to my good friend gary.

						Tom-C
						Texas A&M University

P.S. I'm not at all happy with are *puke* basketball team. And, I do like other 
	colleges, not just A&M. Thanks.

Gig'em!!!!!

> 
>..
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jsosa@encore.com (Joe Sosa)
Subject: Re: ANYONE INTERESTED IN GATORS' SCHEDULE
News-Software: NN 6.4.16
Reply-To: jsosa@encore.com (Joe Sosa)
Organization: Encore Computer Corp
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 13:36:56 GMT

In <167C8100CE.SCHMIDT@LSTC2VM.stortek.com> SCHMIDT@LSTC2VM.stortek.com (Jon Schmidt) writes:

| Jason Fawcett writes:
| >
| >Brian Fox said "  I feel I can contribute, at least as much as one of
| >the QB's who is going to be red-shirted.  I've been a good student and
| >haven't missed a practice. I still don't understand what went into his
| >decision."  In 1988 Brian Fox won the Big Ten Freshman of the year honors
| >at Purdue before transferring to Florida.  Fox was beaten out in 1990 by
| >Shane Matthews.
|  
| It should not surprise anyone that he would want to offer the maximum
| number of 'initial' scholarships this spring in order to meet the talent
| needs of his offense and defense, which are quite different from those
| of Charlie Pell, the previous head coach.  

Eek, my friend, did you forget "Happy Belly" Galen Hall??

Usually, some 'initial'

| think Dean would have supplanted Fox in the backup QB role this year
| anyhow, so I don't think Fox was going to "contribute, at least as much
| as one of the QB's who is going to be red-shirted."  I'd much prefer to
| have that red-shirted QB on the team for the next 4 years than Brian Fox
| for one more mediocre year.
|  
Brian Fox did not get his scholarship renewed, but it also does not mean
that he was kicked off the team.  Spurrier said that Fox is still welcome
on the team.  You do not need a football scholarship to participate in
collegiate football.

Joe Sosa

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ----- ----  /--- |  Joe Sosa -- jsosa@encore.com 
    /   /---   \    |  GO HEAT!!!  HERE COMES THE PLAYOFFS!!
----   ----  ---/   |  GATOR BASEBALL 1992, BEST IN THE LAND!! SEC!! CWS!!
From: bleaf@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Brian F Leaf)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Tennesse vs. Ala<to hell with>bama
Date: 16 Apr 92 04:07:51 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


     In regard to your question about the site of the 92 Bama-UT game, I
just thought I'd point out to you that it really doesn't matter anyway.
As I recall, the Tide has won the last 5 in Big Orange country, so how 
the hell can that be considered a home game for you?  Roll Tide.
From: rowdy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (robert.dieckmann)
Subject: Re: ANYONE INTERESTED IN GATORS' SCHEDULE
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 13:01:45 GMT
Keywords: Fightin' Gators, 92 Schedule

In article <35046@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> abbasi writes:
> 
> If anybody is interested I can post the 92 schedule for the Gators.
> If there is further interest, a list of their recruits can also be
> posted. Let me know !!
> 
Instead, why not go to the directory having this info 
and enter:   rm * <CR>  .

Seriously, post it.  We don't ask permission here.  And there's
not much doing anyway.  Post the schedule, list the recruits,
tell us why you think the Crawling-on-their-bellies gators
will go undefeated.  Be prepared for some counter views, though.


> Waheed
> Just another Fightin' Gator :)


-- 
"Listen up son, and pay attention.   |  Bob Dieckmann (rwd@mtfme.att.com)
How ya' gonna learn anything if you  |  GO: Mets (& dear old Rutgers)
always got your head in a book?"     |  GONE: Brooklyn Dodgers
                -- Foghorn Leghorn   |  **usual disclaimer**
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jimf@cbnewse.cb.att.com (james.r.fehrenbacher)
Subject: academics
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 15:28:49 GMT
Summary:  Big 10 not just athletic

The Big 10 is definitely not an athletic conference only.
There are some cooperative academic and research programs
among schools. I believe the U. of Chicago is also involved
in some of these.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jsosa@encore.com (Joe Sosa)
Subject: Re: Another Time Wasting Topic
News-Software: NN 6.4.16
Reply-To: jsosa@encore.com (Joe Sosa)
Organization: Encore Computer Corp
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 20:08:26 GMT

Fight/School songs.  The best.  The worst.  The stupidest.
 
My vote:	Really don't have one.

Stupidest:	The new Hurri-chant, where fans now learn how to spell 
		C-A-N-E-S.  Ooohh Weeee!

Overplayed:	That damn chant of Florida State!!  I turn into the Hulk (mean
		and beastly-like that is) every time I hear it.

Boring:		USC's, you know, the one they always play after every first
		down.


Joe Sosa

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ----- ----  /--- |  Joe Sosa -- jsosa@encore.com 
    /   /---   \    |  GO HEAT!!!  HERE COMES THE PLAYOFFS!!
----   ----  ---/   |  GATOR BASEBALL 1992, BEST IN THE LAND!! SEC!! CWS!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: cockrel@shab06.larc.nasa.gov (Charlie Cockrell)
Subject: Re: SWC (was Re: 1992 Bowl matchups)
Originator: cockrel@shab06.larc.nasa.gov
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA  USA
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 11:39:49 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.210529.12310@rice.edu> rbutera@sawwhet.owlnet.rice.edu (Rob Butera) writes:
>
>Back when I was at GT and we played Virginia Tech, there was a bit of campus
>folklore that said that a Hokie (I think that's what they're called) is
>really a castrated turkey.  Is this true, or just another piece for the
>storybooks?  Someday I'll bother looking it up ...

It's true - although some won't admit to it. Last year at the UVa-Va. Tech
game, a Tech student tried to convince me that the team is known as the
"Fighting Gobblers" because they football players tended to "gobble
their food" (she was serious!). She didn't have an answer for why they
are referred to as Hokies, nor did she have a clue when pressed about why
there was this big ugly bird standing right in front of us! The way she
told it, it just flew in for Thanksgiving. Now, I guess we know why
Michael wanted the subject kept off of embarrassing mascots. 



-- 
Charlie Cockrell                          VV     VV 1991 Men's Soccer Champs.
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va. VV   VV  1992 Men's NIT Champions  
U.Va. School of Engineering, Class of 1990  VV VV   1991 Women's ACC BB Champs.
(These are my opinions only)                 VVV                        
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: acdendy@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (ROGER DENDY)
Subject: Re: NC or bust. Conferences Titles are Nothing.
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date:  7 Apr 1992 09:02 EST  

In article <1992Apr6.102931@mccall.com>, scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis) writes...
> 
>In article <53530@hydra.gatech.EDU>, mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:
>>Your claim that the Big 8 plays few I-AA teams is true, but it hardly means
>>they don't schedule whatever patsies they can find handy.  The Big 8 simply
>>draws the sacrificial lambs from the Big West, the WAC, and elsewhere.
>>Just last season, for instance, the Big 8 lined up the following powerhouses:
>>
>>Kansas State: Indiana State, Idaho State, Northern Illinois;
> 
  K-State had to line-up IdahoSt since Wisconsin(or KSU)
>backed out of the commitment.  KSU was just looking for someone to
>play.  Too bad the Wis-KSU game didn't happen, I would've thought
>that might have been a good game.  KSU had failed to beat the N.ILL
>Huskies the previous two years.  So maybe this was to prove they 
>could beat them.  Hopefully, this year's KSU schedule will be better.
> 

Kansas St went 7-4 with this schedule, and didn't go to a bowl.  I would 
say a 7-4 K-State coming out of the Big-8 with patsies out-of-conference is 
a much better team than a 6-5 NC State (discussed earlier in the thread) coming 
out of the ACC with patsies out-of-conference.  So maybe all the comparison 
of bowl records is pointless.  I'd prefer to see a comparison of regular 
season out of conference records.

>Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
>(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
>(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA

R Dendy
From: bleaf@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (briboy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: University of TN '92 Football Schedule
Date: 17 Apr 92 03:48:16 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


    May I ask who doesn't think of Alabama as the biggest game on their 
schedule?  I will admit that Bama-Auburn is bigger than life itself and
will never be equalled by any rivalry anywhere, but I guess Alabama-Tennessee
is pretty big as well, especially when fate has been stacked against you
lately, as it has for the Big Orange faithful.  How else can you explain a
terribly mediocre 2-3 Tide team beating a superior Vol squad by blocking 
a field goal in the last couple of minutes and turning it into a game-
winning 3-pointer as time dramatically runs out.  Someone must be
trying to tell the fans in Knoxville something.
     And don't be looking forward to that third Saturday in October, 1992.
The Tide defense will once again make the Orange sky fade hopelessly
into oblivion and the world of the SEC also-rans.  Seven in a row.
Won't it be nice.