HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: chris@kessner.denver.co.us (Chris Hanson)
Subject: sprintf BUG in BSD libraries? (!)
Summary: I'm ripping my hair out. Any my pony-tail isn't happy.
Keywords: BUG, BSD, sprintf
Organization: The Kessner Institute of Something or Another
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 05:33:32 GMT


  Aigh! It's taken me a looong time to finally figure out where the root of
this problem is. It appears to me that there is an output-corruption bug in
the sprintf in the Berkeley compatability library. Could someone please
confirm this for me by running the enclosed code? I'm running AMIX v1.1 on
a 3000/25 with 2chip/8fast Mb of RAM. If this checks out, I'll go ahead and
report it to bugs@cbmvax.

--- enclosed file 'sprintftest.c' ---
/* This is a test.
This is _ONLY_ a test. */

#include <stdio.h>

main()
{
char zbuf[250];
int zfoo;

zfoo = 5;
sprintf(zbuf, "%s %d", "Lord Foo", zfoo);
puts(zbuf);
exit();
}
--- end of file 'sprintftest.c' ---

--- enclosed file 'sprintftest2.c' ---
/* This is a test.
This is _ONLY_ a test. */

#include <stdio.h>

main()
{
char zbuf[250];
int zfoo;

zfoo = 5;
printf( "%s %d", "Lord Foo", zfoo);
exit();
}
--- end of file 'sprintftest2.c'

  Ok, here's how to test it (I've used the AT&T compiler, 'cc' and the GNU
compiler, 'gcc', and there appears to be no difference, but then I didn't
expect there to be):

(The following will compile, link, and run the test program. I use 'spr' as the
executable name 'cause I got tired of typing 'sprintftest' after hours of
debugging. The programs as they are shown above, _SHOULD_ print out the text
"Lord Foo 5".)

gcc -I/usr/ucblinclude -c sprintftest.c
gcc -o spr sprintftest.o -L/usr/ucblib -lucb
spr

  In my tests, this does not work properly. I get garbled output, most often
the text "Lord FooLL". I wonder if it's trying to tell me I'm a fool? ;)

  If we drop the BSD compat library, as shown below:

gcc -I/usr/ucbinclude -c sprintftest.c
gcc -o spr sprintftest.o -L/usr/ucblib
spr

(Note: I still set the library directory, but I do not link anything in from
it.)

  Everything works fine.

  In additiong, if I switch to using printf() instead of sprintf() (as shown
in 'sprintftest2.c') all works correctly with OR without the BSD library.
This can be shown with:

gcc -I/usr/ucblinclude -c sprintftest2.c
gcc -o spr sprintftest2.o -L/usr/ucblib -lucb
spr



  Ok. Did _I_ do something wrong here, or is it really broke? (Don't tell me
to stop using the BSD library, I have a meg of code that's sorta set on
having it handy...)

  Please reply by mail, and follow up too if you wish. My netnews-leisure
time is scarce.

  Chris "You can call me Baldy now..." Xenon
-- 
chris@kessner.denver.co.us (Chris_Hanson || Lord_Xenon || Kelson_Haldane) 
Home: (303)762-0849, Work: (303) 696-8973, Flames: 1-976-DEV-NULL
"...Other fish to fly." -E. Miles
I've nothing to disclaim, since I'm not ON my employer's machine(s).
From: tope@enea.se (Tommy Petersson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga,adsp.unix.misc
Subject: Good-to-have things?
Date: 8 Apr 92 14:15:18 GMT
Reply-To: tope@enea.se (Tommy Petersson)
Organization: Enea Data AB, Sweden
Uucp-Path: mcvax!kth!sunic!enea.se!tope

I will have Amiga Unix in a few weeks time, and I've seen people
posting tips, programs and source in comp.unix.amiga. However, I
haven't had the disk space to save it until now, so I have missed
out on everything but the most recent.

Are the comp.unix.amiga articles stored at any ftp-able machine,
or has anyone collected the "good parts" and is willing to help
me get it?

BTW, as I understand it 2.03 and 2.1 are different releases. Correct?
2.03 has been out for a while, but 2.1 was announced to be released in
the end of March, but seems to be delayed. Comments?


-- 
=============================================================================
 Tommy Petersson              tope@enea.se              Enea Data AB, Sweden
=============================================================================
From: skrenta@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (rich.skrenta)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Booting Amiga Unix 2.01 in single user mode
Date: 14 Apr 92 18:12:32 GMT
Organization: AT&T

emcphers@.cs.vt.edu (Frank McPherson) writes:
> I remember reading a few months ago on the net a way to boot the Amiga
> directly to single user mode.

Hit the 'help' key at some magic time during boot.  You have to do
this after AmigaDOS has left the scene, but before you see any
Unix messages.  Timing can be tricky.

--
Rich Skrenta
From: mjl@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Maurice J. LeBrun)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Looking for a gridding program
Date: 15 Apr 92 22:18:33 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

In article <10APR92.08055595@wl.aecl.ca> roachp@wl.aecl.ca writes:
>Well folks, I have an Amiga unix and my biggest piority is a gridding
>routine for contouring. One that can handle irregular spaced data, and
>possibly x,y,z,a data.  Is there one out there that can operate under Amiga
>Unix? 

There is a BETA version of PLPLOT 4.0 available by anonymous ftp from
hagar.ph.utexas.edu (128.83.179.27) in the pub/ directory.  Get whichever
is latest.  It will hopefully be released for real shortly (I've only been
saying that for 6 months now :-( ).  Anyway, I use it on a bunch of unixes
so it probably will work fine.

Maurice LeBrun    mjl@fusion.ph.utexas.edu
Institute for Fusion Studies, University of Texas at Austin
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: kmg@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (keith.gabryelski)
Subject: Re: login timeout (was Re: This is really stunning, guys.)
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 03:59:51 GMT

scott@starlite.convergent.com (Scott Lurndal) writes:
> Most crackers use dictionary-type approaches.  These have a rather
> high (some studies have shown 80% or more) success rate, and they
> check far fewer combinations (perhaps 100k?)

This isn't true on sufficiently fascist machines that require
passwords to be greater than 4 chacters and have a number in them.
SVR4 can be configured this way.

> At 50 attempts per second, that takes about 33 minutes.

If you are speaking reality then we are talking no more than 1 per
second max.  Remember, we are talking about a brute force hack from
the login prompt with a pause and disconnect every third bad attempt.

I come up with about a day for the mean attempts.  We are not counting
connect time either.

> Ergo, the login timeout, no matter how much we dislike it, is
> valuable from a security standpoint.

Negative.  If we are talking about a modem then connect time will be a
considerable problem say 10 seconds which makes a brute force attack
lead up to 10 days or more.

If we are talking about an ethernet-like network then one can
disconnect while in the sleep(4) and reconnect (and get a login
prompt) before the sleep(4) completes.  You could ofcourse have 10
telnets running into a machine at one time also.  This also makes the
sleep(4) useless.

Pax, Keith
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: roachp@wl.aecl.ca
Subject: Looking for a gridding program
Organization: AECL RESEARCH
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 14:05:55 GMT

Well folks, I have an Amiga unix and my biggest piority is a gridding routine for contouring. One that can handle irregular spaced data, and possibly x,y,z,a data.  Is there one out there that can operate under Amiga Unix?
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: ler@lerami.lerctr.org (Larry Rosenman)
Subject: Re: Accessing 720k PC disks on Unix 2.03 ???
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 23:25:45 GMT

In article <c8908461.702722936@jupiter.newcastle.edu.au> c8908461@jupiter.newcastle.edu.au (ROBERT LAWRENCE LANG) writes:
>Okay, I just installed Unix 2.03 on my 3000UX, and now have the dilemma.
>
>How do I access IBM format disks ??? I've been told this is possible
>and see all the mention in man pages about /dev/rdsk/fd0id but nothing
>about how it all comes together.
>
>I'm not much of a Unix person, but I'm figuring bits out (rather 
>dissappointed with the documentation !!!) and have managed to format
>an "amiga" disk, make a file system and ,mount it successfully, *BUT*
>the same process doesn't work for the /dev/rdsk/fd0id driver and the
>"amiga" disk isn't amiga compatible.
get a package called Mtools from your nearest comp.sources archive, or
get the 2.1 release of Unix which has it installed already.

>
>What I need to do, is transfer source files from the Amiga side to the
>UNIX Side, so specific instructions on how to do this would be great.
Use BRU if you need it RIGHT NOW, BRU is part of 2.04AmigaDOS and
2.x Amiga Unix.
>
>Finally, is there a FAQ list posted here so that I don't bother people
>with old questions ???
nope.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Robert Lang
>4th Year Computer Engineering
>University of Newcastle
>c8908461@jupiter.newcastle.edu.au
>


-- 
Larry Rosenman                               Internet: ler@lerami.lerctr.org 
ATT: +1 214-399-0210 (voice)  BIX: ler       UUCP: ..!utacfd.uta.edu!lerami!ler
US Mail: 900 Lake Isle Circle, Irving, TX 75060-7726 GENIE: LER
From: eb15+@andrew.cmu.edu (Edward D. Berger)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: GVP SCSI controller drivers for AmigaUNIX exist?!!
Date: 14 Apr 92 14:13:14 GMT
Organization: Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Could your RUMORMONGER software also check if GVP has drivers for use
with MINIX?  (for non accelerated Amigas)

Has anyone tried Minix on a 68040 board? 

-Ed Berger
eb15@andrew.cmu.edu
eberger@psc.edu
From: wasp@chumly.ka.sub.org (Walter Mildenberger)
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 15:01:26 +0200
Organization: *private amiga site*
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Distribution: world
Subject: Re: availability of UX apart from 3000UX
X-Newsreader: Ann 0.8m
X-Charset: LATIN1

In article <480@kas.helios.mn.org>,
	rhealey@kas.helios.mn.org (Rob Healey) writes:

$>	AmigaUNIX CAN run on 2500's, 2000+2620+MMU+68881+2091+4M is the minimum
$>	configureation.

Well, even the old [and slow] A2090[a] is sufficient.

Regards
-- 
Walter Mildenberger, Morgenstr. 55, W-7500 Karlsruhe 1,FRG, (0721)385090
Sub/UseNet: wasp@chumly.ka.sub.org -or-  Bitnet: UKF5@DKAUNI2.Bitnet
The mind is like a parachute, it works better when it's open.
From: rhealey@kas.helios.mn.org (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Big hi-res monitor
Date: 2 Apr 92 15:08:25 GMT
Article-I.D.: kas.459
Organization: Rob's home system, Hopkins, MN

In article <1992Mar30.234146.30866@europa.asd.contel.com> sangster@kirk.lab.oasis.contel.com writes:
=I am thinking about buying a 17" Sony 1280x1024 monitor for my UX, and was
=wondering if anyone has such a beast attached to their system.  What I am
=really interested in is finding out if X (even if only mono) can handle
=this high of a resolution?  If I had the Lowell board would it handle this
=resolution with the proper crystals?
=
	Yes, it would. Personally, I'd buy the DMI resolver board as it
	is much more flexible than the A2410 and it has ADOS support
	as well, the A2410 isn't usable under ADOS.

=I am afraid that a 13" monitor just doesn't cut it anymore when running
=X/Open Look.
=
	With stock video you'll get bigger dots, that's about it...

		-Rob
From: rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: GVP SCSI controller drivers for AmigaUNIX exist?!!
Date: 13 Apr 92 18:14:20 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth. Information Services.


	Seems my RUMORMONGER software, version 0.00000000000001 just
	spewed out that hidden deep inside the guts of GVP's labs AmigaUNIX
	drivers exist for their SCSI controller line! If this is
	true then Amiga 2000 owners could set up one kick ass AmigaUNIX
	system with the GVP CPU/32bit memory/SCSI cards!

	Anybody know somebody at GVP who could confirm this? Maybe GVP
	could do what DMI did and get their drivers placed on the AmigaUNIX
	boot floppys!?! How about the other SCSI controller vendors? Anybody
	know if any other vendor has AmigaUNIX SCSI drivers gathering
	dust in a lab rather than being on the 2.1 AmigaUNIX boot floppys?

	If we could get GVP and other SCSI vendor's to place their drivers
	on the AmigaUNIX distribution floppys/tape it would REALLY help
	things out!

	So, is my early release RUMORMONGER playing with me like it's older
	sibling BLAZEMONGER? Or is there truth in this important revelation?!!!

		-Rob
From: ee23042f@vttcf.cc.vt.edu (Zaphod Beeblebrox)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Booting Amiga Unix 2.01 in single user mode
Date: 14 Apr 92 16:03:35 GMT

emcphers@.cs.vt.edu (Frank McPherson) writes:
> I remember reading a few months ago on the net a way to boot the Amiga directly
> to single user mode.  I've put a command in my rc2.d directory which 
> is hanging for some reason, and need to get it the heck out.  I'd prefer
> to do it without having to resort to a boot floppy.  If you remember how

  In the file /etc/inittab, the first line is something like 
  "is:2:initdefault"
      ^
     This is the run level that you will boot to.  So, for single user,
     change the "2" to a "1" and you will boot single user just fine.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ;-) %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Brian Wentz     
Virginia Tech                          wentz@csugrad.cs.vt.edu          
703-232-2300
From: rhealey@kas.helios.mn.org (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: A3000UX for sale
Keywords: Amiga, UNIX, Unix
Date: 4 Apr 92 17:54:28 GMT
Organization: Rob's home system, Hopkins, MN

In article <id.RPIO.8O@ferranti.com> peter@ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
=I really wish someone at Commodore would give us SOME sort of indication
=that there's a marketing plan out there? Every time they come up with a
=good idea they seem to dump it after 6 months before it's had a chance to
=work.
=
	I hear tell C= US cycles out their whole marketing dept. every 6 - 8
	months, maybe that could explain the dumping of marketing campaigns
	that were actually getting somewhere...

		-Rob
From: rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Open Windows (or was it Loook)
Date: 7 Apr 92 16:52:22 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth. Information Services.

In article <1992Mar30.053330.3540@monique.bubble.org> ag@monique.bubble.org (Keith Gabryelski) writes:
=rhealey@digibd.com (Rob Healey) writes:
=> 	Actually the TIGA server in 2.03 is still X11R3.
=
=There is no X11R3 server on the 2.03 tape.  2.03 still has the
=beta X11R4 TIGA version, though.

	I should clearify that statement. The TIGA GM is the same as
	the one on 1.1 for any version of 2.03 I ever received. The
	X server itself of course was X11R4 on 2.03.

		-Rob
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: ler@lerami.lerctr.org (Larry Rosenman)
Subject: Re: C-News
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 12:51:41 GMT
Organization: Larry Rosenman - Personal Machine
Keywords: queuelen needs a fix.

In order for the Cnews batching limits to work, you need to change:

/usr/public/lib/newsbin/queuelen

in the 2 places in the script where it has $1 to have
$1/$grade

so it can find the right directory to count. 

also, add d to your /etc/uucp/Grades file since C-News likes to use it. 

Larry
-- 
Larry Rosenman                            Internet: ler@lerami.lerctr.org 
ATT: +1 214-399-0210 (voice)  BIX: ler    UUCP: ..!utacfd.uta.edu!lerami!ler
US Mail: 900 Lake Isle Circle, Irving, TX 75060-7726 GENIE: LER
From: rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: DAT drives
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:36:53 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth. Information Services.


	Has anybody gotton DAT type drives to work with the AmigaUNIX
	tape driver? I think I'll be able to mooch a DAT in the next
	month or so and am going to be playing with it. Any advice would
	be appreciated!

		-Rob
From: stephan@odin.unomaha.edu (Mark Stephan)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: BSD available for Amiga's ?
Date: 14 Apr 92 21:11:37 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha



Is BSD available for the Amiga yet ???

Has anyone heard if it is released yet ??

How is the software going to be dist. ?

What models will it run on ??

When is going to be released (If not released yet) ?


Please let me know.

Thanks     

Mark Stephan


*******************************************************************************
*                                                                             *
*                                 Mark Stephan                                * 
*                        Network & Computer Specialist                        *
*                        Local Area Network Administrator                     *
*                 College of Education,  University of NE @ Omaha             *
*                                                                             *
*                        E-mail:   STEPHAN@ZEUS.UNOMAHA.EDU                   *
*                        Phone :   (402) 556-0247                             * 
*******************************************************************************
--

*******************************************************************************
*                                                                             *
*                                 Mark Stephan                                *
From: rhealey@kas.helios.mn.org (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: 2.1 ttymon the culprit
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:37:26 GMT
Organization: Rob's home system, Hopkins, MN


	I spakith to soon, so what else is new? It turns out scrmon isn't
	the culprit, it appears the ttymon in 2.1 is what flips up
	the screen menu every time you log out of a VT. Grrrrrrrrrr.

	Looks like it's time to restore the ttymon from 2.03...

		-Rob
From: scott@starlite.convergent.com (Scott Lurndal)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: login timeout (was Re: This is really stunning, guys.)
Date: 8 Apr 92 22:07:57 GMT
Reply-To: scottl@convergent.com
Organization: UNISYS Unix Systems Group, San Jose, Ca.

In article <1992Apr6.202808.29317@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, skrenta@cbnewsg.att.com (Rich Skrenta) writes:
|
|> I figure this allows roughly 50 passwords per second to be tried.
|> 
|> How many passwords are there?  Well, 26 uppercase letters, 26
|> lowercase letters, 10 digits plus about 31 punctuation characters
|> (what I count on my keyboard).  So 93^8 is 5,595,818,096,650,401.
|> 
|> Divinding I get 3,548,844 years.
|> 
|> Taking a slightly more realistic 1 second per attempt (including our
|> long wait at the end, and connection time) we get 177,442,227 years.
|> 
|> Crackers don't get into systems this way.

You are right, sophisticated crackers don't generally use this brute-force
method for breaking into systems (although, there was the time on the 
PDP-8 (tss-8/e) where we had a paper tape with each 1 to 3-letter password
on it; whenever the system manager changed the password, just run the tape
through the asr-33 reader :-).   Most crackers use dictionary-type
approaches.  These have a rather high (some studies have shown 80% or more)
success rate, and they check far fewer combinations (perhaps 100k?)

At 50 attempts per second, that takes about 33 minutes.   Ergo, the 
login timeout, no matter how much we dislike it, is valuable from a 
security standpoint.    'twould be nice, however, for it to be 
controlled by a parameter in /etc/default/login for those sites who
don't really care.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: stevem@grok22.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM (Steve McClure)
Subject: Re: This is really stunning, guys.
Reply-To: Steve.McClure@ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM
Organization: NCR E&M Columbia
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 92 13:16:03 GMT

In article <1992Apr3.025140.22253@ux.acs.umn.edu>, har@ux.acs.umn.edu (--SeebS--) writes:
|> In article <1992Apr2.164712.14207@urbana.mcd.mot.com> qbarnes@urbana.mcd.mot.com (Quentin Barnes) writes:
|> >But SVR4 does lock up the port for 5 minutes.  Try logging in and
|> >out quickly on the console.  If you can do it 10 times in
|> >two minutes, init will think the ttymon is respawning too
|> >rapidly and turn off the port for 5 minutes.
|> 
|> Yeah, but that's not a security issue; that's a "keep log files from
|> filling disk space" issue. For instance, assume my TIGA device gets
|> screwed up so it will stay down until a reboot (not unheard of.) Assume
|> further that I am trying to run xdm. xdm could start X about every five
|> seconds, and completely destroy my performance, and fill my disk with
|> error messages, if no one stopped it.
|> 

xdm is not run by ttymon so that argument doesn't really apply, but the theory
is the same.  ttymon assumes you have a hardware error, usually the case if
port opens keep failing.  I guess I should have said xdm is not run by ttymon
in SRV4/386, not sure about the Amiga implementation, but it doesn't really
make sense for the port monitor to do that.


[ rest deleted ]

-- 
Thanks,

Steve McClure		internet:	Steve.McClure@ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM
NCR E&M Columbia 	uucp:		...!uunet!ncrlink!ncrcae!steve.mcclure
3325 Platt Springs Rd	Ma Bell:	(803) 796-9250
West Columbia, SC 29169
Disclaimer:	The above are my opinions and are not NCR official policy.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: bernd@pfm.rmt.sub.org (Bernd Hennig)
Subject: Re: Motif on Amiga UNIX
Organization: PFM News & Mail RMT Mainz, Germany
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 19:59:21 GMT

jcrowe@mpd.tandem.com (Joseph Crowe) writes:

>Hi Folks,

>   Subject says it all.  Has it been ported?

And again - YES - avaiable here in germany - your local
CBM-Produktmanager has to contact Thomas Giger at ESCO
in Frankfurt for more information !

(Sorry for my bad english...)

-- 
Bernd Hennig | PFM News & Mail RMT | 06131 / 362779 | bernd@pfm.rmt.sub.org
" Fuellen die das Bier in Faesser ? " 
                  " Ja, aber vorher nehmen sie die Katzen raus !"      - ALF
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: harp@netcom.com (Gregory O. Harp)
Subject: Help me duplicate a QIC tape...
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 92 04:03:20 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 


I need suggestions on how to duplicate a 150MB QIC tape using an Amiga
3000 (running AmigaDOS 2.04) and an A3070 tape drive.  Is there any
way to do this currently with only one tape drive?

I need to preserve the blocking format of the tape.  Actually, it
would be nice to do an exact image copy.

The reason I want to do this with my Amiga is that my Sun won't be
running for about another week.  (BTW, I use the A3070 with my Sun,
too -- nice double-use for it).

Anyway, if there is a way to do this with existing software out there,
I'd appreciate it.  I guess that if it comes down to it, suggestions
on a tape driver that would allow me to raw data reads/writes would be
useful.  I would have to do a multi-pass copy of around 10-20MB per
pass (Yuck!).

Any suggestions would be appreciated.  If there is sufficient
interest, I will post a summary or at least mail info to all the "Me
too" respondants.

TIA,
Greg
-- 
---------------Greg-Harp----------------harp@netcom.netcom.com---------------
           "We're not hitchhiking anymore.  We're riding!" -- Ren
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: sevigny@vlsi.polymtl.ca (Benoit Sevigny)
Subject: Wanted: 2.1 tape and manuals
Organization: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 92 23:58:54 GMT

To anybody who (will) received AmigaUNIX 2.1 and, for any reasons, would
wan't to get rid of it: email me, I will buy it.





--
===============================================================================
     /// Benoit Sevigny, software | Skipping every x86 lines in your sources
 \\\///  engineering student      | might remove both your most irreductible
  \\V/   sevigny@info.polymtl.ca  | bugs and bottlenecks!!!
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
From: roachp@wl.aecl.ca
Subject: RE: Info wanted on X for Amiga and A2065 Ethernet
Organization: AECL RESEARCH
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 04:34:05 GMT

How about someone coming up with decnet protocols for Amiga Unix?