From: gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: Suxanne's reasoning abilities (Was: BogieBoy's sensor array)
Keywords: You expect me to mark my deletions?  Dream on... 
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 18:32:08 GMT

<1992Nov11.032723.7353@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran) said:
>[I was going to trim this article down, but I couldn't figure out how...]

That's ok, Keith.  *I* know how. ;-)

><nyikos.721362033@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
>>In <1992Nov3.013018.14080@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran) writes:
>>>In article <SCOTTS.92Oct30152501@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU> scotts@CS.CMU.EDU (Scott Safier) writes:
[Suzanne Forgach is being discussed]
>>>>   3) She doesn't have a chance of getting AIDS.
>>>>
>>>>Like Kimberly Bergalis (sp?)
>>
>>>Let's not forget "the rest of the story".  Dr. Akers, a homosexual, infected
>>>Kimberly with HIV because (1)He knew she was a virgin, and (2)She refused
>>>to go out with him.
>>
>>>Suxanne said it, and with all that integrity and honesty she's got going
>>>for her, it's _gotta_ be true, right?
>>
>>Did Suxanne really say that? Where?  And what does Suzanne have to
>>say about this? :-)
>
>Trying to hedge your bets with a smiley, Peter?
>
>Ok, would somebody who holds the SacredSuxanneSayings archive please dig
>through and show Peter just what sort of a rabid pit-bull it is he's
>dealing with?

Ask and it shall be done...  Although I do agree that Peter will either
not respond or choose to believe that Suzanne was "kidding".  The post is
included in it's entirety.  The pertinent part is at the bottom.  There
were some other follow up posts that covered the "refusal to date"
presumption of Suzanne's part.

*********************************************
<1991Dec13.192700.20802@noao.edu> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) said:
>From article by KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick):
>> 
>> 1> What kind of a drooling moron would *choose* to be homosexual?  
>
>Kurt, even _I_ can see that could easily be taken as an anti-homosexual,
>bigotted statement.   You're implying there's something wrong with
>homosexuality.
>
>> With the
>> way they're still treated even today, with all the prejudice and bigotry
>> still around (no, I don't mean you, you at least don't claim they should
>> be killed like some people from PSU have said :-), *WHY* would anyone
>> *CHOOSE* to be homosexual?????  Makes no sense, doesn't happen.
>
>Hatred by others is not the victim's problem.  It is the problem of those
>who hate.   We could equally say that "Why would anyone *CHOOSE* to be
>a Christian?????"  given all the hatred in the world against Christians,
>and "Why would so many of them choose to be Christians even in places where
>it's downright illegal?????"
>
>The point is, they do.   Just because _you_ wouldn't choose it, doesn't
>mean others don't.
>
>> 2> Why do you say homosexuals are the ones spreading AIDS?  Are you aware
>>    that AIDS is becoming less and less common in the homosexual community
>>    (because they are educating themselves about it), and RISING in the hetero-
>>    sexual community?  (because many of us still think it's a 'gay' thing, and
>>    don't bother to learn about it)?  With this in mind, clarify how you think
>>    homosexual behavior in particular is spreading AIDS.
>
>Excuse me, Kurt, but I recall a few press conferences when AIDS first was
>identified, while it was still mostly confined to the male homosexual
>community, with gay male leaders standing on platforms, LOUDLY SUGGESTING
>that other gay males deliberately pass the virus into the general population,
>in order to "get it the attention" they wanted it to get.  How do you think
>it GOT into the heterosexual community?
>
>(btw - Don't think for one MINUTE, that Kimberly Bergalis' dentist didn't
>       DELIBERATELY pass the AIDS virus to that pretty young virginal girl,
>       injecting it into her as she lay anesthesized at his feet.   Of
>       COURSE he picked a virgin, just to prove the hot political slogan
>       that "everybody gets it".)
>Well, bucko, everybody _doesn't_ get it.  She was murdered.
*********************************************

For Peter's benefit:
1) How did the dentist know she was a virgin?  Does it seem likely to you
that a virgin would tell her dentist?
2) How does Suzanne know that the dentist knew she was a virgin?  Do you
think that he sent Suzanne confidential information?
3) How does Suzanne know that this dentist did it, "just to prove" that
everyone gets AIDS?
4) Why does Suzanne think that dentists perform examinations and services
with their patients lying on the floor?
5) Could Suzanne's ravings stem from her fear and hatred of gays, and her
belief that all gay men hate women?
6) Will you respond to this and actually attempt to defend her again? Why?


Gordon
Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), Diana (Sorceress), Beth, 
"CJ", and Nadja, and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it all.
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Xref: sparky talk.abortion:49015 soc.men:19734 alt.dads-rights:2671