HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Envelope-to: nodmgt-l@BITNIC.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"nodmgt-l@bitnic"
X-VMS-Cc: IN%"AP01@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK,postmast@UKACRL,dst4jst@brufsc",GOMIDE
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 12 Aug 1992 14:42:00 BSC
Reply-To:     gomide@BRFAPQ
Comments:     @FAPQ.FAPESP.BR - @FAPQ%FPSP.HEPNET - @BRFAPQ.BITNET - .BR
              gateway
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was GOMIDE@BRFAPQ
From:         gomide@FPSP.FAPESP.BR
Subject:      Re: Mail to user@BRUFPR is being misdirected to user@BRFAPESP
Comments: cc: AP01@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK, postmast@UKACRL.BITNET,
              dst4jst@BRUFSC.BITNET

 I wrote:
> This is a recent effect in the Bitnet newtork. Many nodes suddenly
> started to send mail addresses to USER@BRUFPR to USER@BRFAPESP. All
> mail from .UK that passes through UKACRL are so misdirected, and many
> lists have had bounced mail.

This is a know syndrome: "everybody is wrong but me!"  :-(
I found the error in my tables. Please disregard this "problem".

Yours,
--
Alberto Courrege Gomide <gomide@fapq.fapesp.br>
  Systems Manager - (ACG8) .BR Domain Technical Contact.
Fundacao de Amparo `a Pesquisa - (11)831-3111 ext.247
  Rua Pio XI, 1500 - CEP 05468-901 - Sao Paulo - Brazil
  FAX (11)261-4167 Telex (11)82014
--
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Sat, 15 Aug 1992 17:12:35 MET
From:         Ulrich Giese <U001213@HNYKUN11.URC.KUN.NL>
Subject:      Re: :internet, VERS9209 NODUPD, and Poland

On Wed, 5 Aug 92 00:19:22 +0200 Eric Thomas said:
>
>On Tue, 4 Aug 1992 18:16:59 -0400 jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU said:
>
>>Given  that  anything.Bitnet (or  .Earn/.Caren/.etc)  is  invalid as  an
>>internet name  it might be  useful to test  for these error  cases. This
>>does not validate that anything else is correct, but atleast it won't be
>>wrong in this fashion.
>
>Are  we in  a time  loop?  We have  had  this discussion  at least  twice
>already. For  now, this  is the  only way  to define  NJE aliases  in the
>"improved" new format BITEARN NODES, something for which there is a clear
>and strong  business case, given  the amount  of systems which  are being
>consolidated into larger systems. Add a  way to define NJE aliases and we
>can again  discuss this with  a hope  of reaching a  different conclusion
>(not that we had really reached any conclusion).
>
>  Eric

pls clarify. should this check be part of VERNODES or not ?
-ulrich-
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Sat, 15 Aug 1992 17:07:34 MET
From:         Ulrich Giese <U001213@HNYKUN11.URC.KUN.NL>
Subject:      Re: :internet, VERS9209 NODUPD, and Poland
              4 Aug 92 18:16:59 -0400 from <jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU>

On Tue, 4 Aug 92 18:16:59 -0400 <jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU> said:
.....
>> >>Does this follow the NEWTAGS file?  "PLANIF61.BITNET" is NOT an Internet
>> >>address.
>> >
>> >as said earlier, i can not and will not check the value of the :internet.
>> >(and for example :x400.) tags.
..
>
>Given that anything.Bitnet (or .Earn/.Caren/.etc) is invalid as an internet
>name it might be useful to test for these error cases.  This does not
>validate that anything else is correct, but atleast it won't be wrong in this
>fashion.

ok. i will add that checking to VERNODES. also (i'd asked one/two weeks ago
about checking the :x400. tag)  what do you think, should i also add that
checking as described in the NEWTAGS DESCRIPT ?.

-ulrich-
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: nodmgt-l@BITNIC.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"nodmgt-l@bitnic"
X-VMS-Cc: IN%"AP01@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK,postmast@UKACRL",GOMIDE
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 12 Aug 1992 10:39:00 BSC
Reply-To:     gomide@BRFAPQ
Comments:     @FAPQ.FAPESP.BR - @FAPQ%FPSP.HEPNET - @BRFAPQ.BITNET - .BR
              gateway
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was GOMIDE@BRFAPQ
From:         gomide@FPSP.FAPESP.BR
Subject:      Mail to user@BRUFPR is being misdirected to user@BRFAPESP
Comments: cc: AP01@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK, postmast@UKACRL.BITNET

 Stephen Clark writes:
(: Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 10:45:22 BST
(: From: stephen clark <AP01@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>

(: Could you tell me whether Jose Borges Neto has changed his userid, or
(: has left the node entirely?
(: Stephen Clark
(: Liverpool
(: listowner PHILOS-L

This is a recent effect in the Bitnet newtork. Many nodes suddenly
started to send mail addresses to USER@BRUFPR to USER@BRFAPESP. All
mail from .UK that passes through UKACRL are so misdirected, and many
lists have had bounced mail.

Node BRUFPR has a tag:

:nick.BRUFPR :alias.BRUFPR :net.ANSP :mailer.SMTPUSER@BRFAPESP :netsoft.BITE

in XMAILER.NAMES. This means that mail to user@brufpr should be sent
as BSMTP mail to smtpuser@brfapesp, but many nodes (such as UICVM,
UKACRL, even Brazilian nodes) started to misbehave in such a fashion.
Can someone point the reason for this?

Yours,
--
Alberto Courrege Gomide <gomide@fapq.fapesp.br>
  Systems Manager - (ACG8) .BR Domain Technical Contact.
Fundacao de Amparo `a Pesquisa - (11)831-3111 ext.247
  Rua Pio XI, 1500 - CEP 05468-901 - Sao Paulo - Brazil
  FAX (11)261-4167 Telex (11)82014
--
From: ehc0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (EDWARD H. CINCA)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Subject: Info needed on BITNET --- Anyone?
Date: 21 Aug 92 16:54:15 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

Does anyone know how to get in contact with a student from  Georgetown Law
School? I know that the undergraduates are able to use BITNET but I need to
find out about the law students. Thanks.

ehc0@lehigh.edu
-- 
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Sat, 15 Aug 1992 17:21:59 MET
From:         Ulrich Giese <U001213@HNYKUN11.URC.KUN.NL>
Subject:      Re: Univ of Amman, Transjordan
              7 Aug 92 12:51:57 CDT from <B19141@ANLVM.CTD.ANL.GOV>

On Fri, 7 Aug 92 12:51:57 CDT Barry Finkel said:
>
>>anyway, does anybody know if the Univ of Amman at Transjordon has
>>a node?  How can I find out if they're in Gulfnet?  ...
>Since there are no Jordanian nodes in BITEARN NODES, there are no Jordanian
>nodes as part of GULFNET.  I would suggest sending e-mail to the technical
>contact at SAKACS00, the "hub" node of GULFNET to inquire if the site in
 -------------------
the coordinator of GULFNET is "Iyad A. Al-Bukhari" OPRNAD @ SAUPM00.
-ulrich-

>question has plans to connect to GULFNET or if there may be other networking
>connections to Jordan.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Barry S. Finkel
>Computing and Telecommunications Division
>Argonne National Laboratory               BITNET:   B19141@ANLVM
>9700 South Cass Avenue                    Internet: B19141@ANLVM.CTD.ANL.GOV
>Building 221, Room B223                   Phone:    (708) 252-7277
>Argonne, IL   60439-4844                  Facsimile:(708) 252-5983
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: nodmgt-l@bitnic.bitnet
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Mts: smtp
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 14:47:47 -0400
From:         Greg Smith <smith@HELIOTROPE.BUCKNELL.EDU>
Subject:      Bucknell University leaving BITNET
Comments: cc: rbf@psuvm.psu.edu, weber@bucknell.edu

Bucknell University in Lewsiburg, PA, USA is planning to leave BITNET
as of September 30, 1992.  The DELETE MEMBER/NODE messages to
UPDATE@BITNIC will be sent on September 1 to insure our exclusion from
the October routing tables.  This departure affects nodes BUCKNELL and
BKNLVMS.  Mail to any user ID at either of these nodes can be directed
over the Internet to the same userID@bucknell.edu.  There are no BITNET
nodes downstream from Bucknell.  Please direct any questions you have
about this upcoming change to postmaster@bucknell.edu or postmast@bucknell.bitne
   t.

Sincerely,

Greg Smith

======================================================================
Greg Smith, Systems Analyst                   Computer Services
Internet:   smith@bucknell.edu                Bucknell University
AT&Tnet:    (717) 524-1801                    Lewisburg PA  17837  USA
======================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 15:19:49 -0400
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         "Paul A. Cary" <pac5@PO.CWRU.EDU>
Subject:      Synonym terms
X-To:         innopac%maine.BITNET@cunyvm.CUNY.Edu

About a month ago I asked for words of wisdom on the synonym or thesaurus
feature of III, and promised to summarize.

I received two replies.  One expressed grave concern about this feature, based
on the fact that terms loaded as synonyms cannot be searched separately, nor
can the linking be undone.  The second reply was from an institution which
decided not to load any terms, because they felt that it would be difficult to
decide when to stop loading them.  Where does one draw the line.  Which terms
should be included and which excluded?  They felt that confusion would result
among users who expected that all variant spellings would be in *the computer*.

I really don't know what we will do here.  I suspect that we will exercise
caution.  Thank you very much to all who replied.

--
Paul Cary                                     Internet: pac5@po.cwru.edu
Public Services Librarian                     Bitnet: pac5%po.cwru.edu@cunyvm
The Cleveland Institute of Music
11021 East Blvd, Cleveland, OH 44106
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mts-Userid: LGCS
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 16:18:28 EDT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         ALINE.SOULES@UM.CC.UMICH.EDU
Subject:      Synonym terms
X-To:         INNOPAC%MAINE.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU

My understanding from Innovative was that the list could be added to or
deleted from AT ANY TIME.  Your message implies that this is not the case.
If the terms are linked, I understand that they cannot be searched separately,
but if they can be unlinked again, it would seem logical that they would
again be separate.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
X-Mts-Userid: LGCS
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Wed, 19 Aug 1992 12:25:00 EDT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         ALINE.SOULES@UM.CC.UMICH.EDU
X-To:         INNOPAC%MAINE.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU

What a great list!  Thanks for sharing it.

Aline Soules, Manager
Technical Services & Automation
Kresge Business Administration Library
K3330 School of Business Administration
University of Michigan
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: innopac@maine.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"innopac@maine.bitnet"
X-VMS-Cc: KMWHITL
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 11:24:00 MST
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         KMWHITL@ARIZVMS.BITNET
Subject:      Export Feature question

Who out there has experience with the Export feature?  We are especially
interested in how well it works with external databases.  Please respond
to me personally if you like.
        Thanks, Kathy Whitley, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
        internet:  kmwhitl@ccit.arizona.edu
        bitnet:  kmwhitl@arizvms.bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"INNOPAC%MAINE.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Tue, 18 Aug 1992 08:12:00 PDT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         DDAVIS@FULLERTON.EDU
Subject:      Re: renewals
X-To:         INNOPAC%MAINE.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU

You may renew only one screen at a time.  This is very inconvenient when faculty
 have checked out dozens of books.  I hope III will change in the future.
Diana Davis-CSU Fullerton.  DDavis@Fullerton.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Thu, 20 Aug 1992 11:25:15 EDT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         Melissa Jadlos <MJADLOS@STLAWU.BITNET>
Subject:      b. board info.
X-To:         innopac@maine.maine.edu

Hi,
   I'm helping a co-worker with an introduction to bulletin boards and she is
interested in an archival and/or rare books bb.  Does anyone know of
bulletin boards on these subjects?  Thank you.

Please respond directly to me and not to the list.

Melissa Jadlos
mjadlos@stlawu.bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Tue, 18 Aug 1992 08:45:16 EDT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         ALINE SOULES <USERLGCS@UMICHUM.BITNET>
Subject:      patron records

In the patron record, various tags and data are defined by Innovative for
use.  Among these are some patron codes that are undefined for customization
by the library.  What have libraries chosen to use these for?  I will be
happy to summarize responses for the list so please send them to me
directly.  Thanks very much.

Aline Soules, Manager
Technical Services & Automation
Kresge Business Administration Library
K3330 School of Business Administration
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1234
tel. 313-764-5532
e-mail:  userlgcs@umichum.bitnet
    or:  userlgcs@mbs.umich.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Thu, 13 Aug 1992 10:18:42 -0700
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         diablo@GARNET.BERKELEY.EDU
Subject:      Student Assistant Manual
X-To:         innopac@maine.edu

We are revising our student assistant circulation manual and would
appreciate receiving informatin on how other libraries have trained
student assistants on Innopac circulation procedures.  Please respond
to me at:diablo@garnet.berkeley.edu  or mail information to:
Mary Dolven
Diablo Valley College LIbrary
321 Golf Club Road
Pleasant Hill, CA  94523
Thank you.
Mary Dolven
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Thu, 20 Aug 1992 15:36:55 PDT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         "Gail A. Hitchcock" <hitch%cheshire.oxy.edu@SDSC.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Summary holdings statements
X-To:         INNOPAC%MAINE.BITNET@Sdsc.BITNET
              92 2:01 pm

>
> We would like to hear from libraries any advice they can share
> on storing the summary holdings statements in the bib vs. the
> check-in record "LIB HAS" fields.  We understand it is possible to choose
> either  place or a combination.  Please let us know the pros and cons of
> these choices.  We are also interested in your thoughts about
> the US Marc Holdings Format and issues for converting from III
> to US Marc.  Thank you.
>
> You may reply directly to:
> Diane Grover
> University of Washington Libraries
> (206) 543-4786
> grover@u.washington.edu
>

We input our summary holdings statements into bib records because we don't
have checkin records for titles other than those we have current subscriptions
to or were cancelled within the last three years.  In reading about Release 8
though, if you plan to load a journal citation database and want citations to
link to your holdings statement, then it must be in the checkin record and
have a MARC tag of either 853/863 or 866.  The MARC tag is a problem for us
because we add records through OCLC tape loads and these MARC tags do not
export onto OCLC tapes.  This information is from Innovative's Preliminary
Announcement, p. 32 & 38.

Gail Hitchcock, Catalog Librarian, Occidental College, Los Angeles
hitch@oxy.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"innopac@maine.maine.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Wed, 19 Aug 1992 12:27:00 EST
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         L_BILLS@CC.BRYNMAWR.EDU
Subject:      Internet lists of library catalogs
X-To:         innopac@maine.maine.edu

Is anyone aware of any protocol or etiquette about who is put on
(1) directories of OPAC available on the internet or
(2) access programs like LIBTEL for selecting and connecting to
   libraries on the internet

Do these lists/programs only include libraries that have somehow
announced their availablity and invited the internet in, or are they
any addresses the list maker can find?  Should we be careful how
we use these lists?

On another level, we are about to get the III gateway software.  We
plan to ask libraries we put on our menu for their permission and
we would appreciate similar inquiries for us of our catalog on
other gateways.  I expect this is happening, right?  Since
release 8 will allow us to define who can have access over the internet,
it may become necessary to get permission anyway.

Linda Bills
Tri-College Consortium
l_bills@cc.brynmawr.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Thu, 13 Aug 1992 15:37:41 -0400
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         popwin@UU.PSI.COM
Subject:      asis Metro NY Chapter 1992 Fall Semina
X-To:         ill-l@uvmvm.BITNET
X-cc:         innopac@maine.maine.edu, libadmin@umab.BITNET

--------------------------------------------------------------
The following message has been cross-posted to several lists.
Sorry for duplication.
_______________________________________________________________

          ASIS METRO NY CHAPTER 1992 FALL SEMINAR

               INFORMATION WITHOUT TOOLS ??

     ... encompasses the entire spectrum of communication media.
It focuses on the challenge of developing innovative engines to
manipulate, retrieve, and manage the large digitized information
stores that are being created through new and easy media
transformation techniques.

Speakers:

James Anderson
Vice President of Sales, Market Statistics, Inc.
"Ease of Data Base Management in the Demographic World"

Dr. Rudolph M. Bell
Codirector, The Medieval & Early Modern Data Bank
Rutgers University
"The Banking of History"

Dr. Dennis Egan
Director, Information Science Research, Bellcore
"Creating and Using the CORE Electronic Library"

Colin McQuillan
Manager, GE Investments Research Library
"Optical Information Systems: Image Or Reality?"

Terry Russo
Research Associate
Paintings Conservation Dept., Metropolitan Museum of Art
"Electronic Imaging in Paintings Conservation at the Metropolitan
Museum"

Dr. Jocelyn Penny Small
Manager, Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae
Rutgers University
"The US Database of Classical Iconography: Issues of Simplicity
and Complexity in Design"

Dr. Jane Stone
Collections Infromation Systems Manager

Metropolitan Museum of Art
"Essential Elements of Text-based Museum Collections Information
Systems"

     DATE:          SEPT 11, 1992 (FRIDAY)

     TIME:          10:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M.

     LOCATION:      IBM BUILDING
                    590 MADISON AVENUE
                    NEW YORK CITY
                    (NE CORNER OF 57TH & MADISON)

          Mail Reservations:                      At the Door:
          -----------------                       -----------
Members        $60.00                               $70.00
Non-members    $75.00                               $90.00
Students       $25.00                               $30.00

                    (Lunch is included)

Mailed reservations are encouraged.  No cash at the door.

Please make checks payable to - asis Metro NY - and forward with
the registration form by August 28 to:
               Joe DeFalco
               c/o asis Metro NY Chapter
               471 East 16th Street
               Brooklyn, NY 11226
               (718) 802-2370

-----------------------------------------------------------------
REGISTRATION FROM

Name:___________________________________________________________

Organization:___________________________________________________

Address:________________________________________________________

Phone:______________________   E-Mail:__________________________

ASIS Member __      Non-Member __       Student __
From: KMWHITL@ARIZVMS.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Subject: Inspec loaded as an external database?
Date: 14 Aug 92 18:26:00 GMT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: innopac@maine.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"innopac@maine.bitnet"
X-VMS-Cc: KMWHITL

Another question, who has Inspec loaded as an external database on their
Innopac system?  We are interested in how indexed for searching, etc.
Please respond to me personally.
        Thanks, Kathy Whitley, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
        internet:  kmwhitl@ccit.arizona.edu
        bitnet:  kmwhitl@arizvms.bitnet
From: SHELLS@UKANVM.BITNET (shelly)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Subject: Re: Fully automated libraries to visit
Date: 18 Aug 92 16:07:33 GMT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
              17 Aug 1992 09:04:50 CST from <SARAHB@VM1.UCA.EDU>

We are fully automated with the Innopac.  We are located near the  MO state lin
e. University of Kansas Medical Center-Dykes Library.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 09:04:50 CST
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         Sarah Bryan <SARAHB@VM1.UCA.EDU>
Subject:      Fully automated libraries to visit
X-To:         Multiple recipients of list advan-l
              <advan-l%idbsu@uafsysb.uark.edu>,
              Multiple recipients of list carl-l
              <carl-l%uhccvm@uafsysb.uark.edu>,
              Multiple recipients of list circplus
              <circplus%idbsu@uafsysb.uark.edu>,
              Multiple recipients of list innopac
              <innopac%maine@uafsysb.uark.edu>

We have CLSI public catalog, circulation and technical services mode in
our library and are seeking libraries to visit which are fully automated
including acquisitions, order records, serial check in, circulation,
technical services mode and public catalog access.  We are at a point where
we critically need to upgrade and want to make a thorough investigation
before we decide what step to take next.  We would like to know of any
libraries in Missouri, Tennessee, Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, or Arkansas that
are fully automated with CLSI, DRA, DYNIX or VTLS and if these libraries would
welcome a visit from our Technical Services Librarians.  We are having trouble
locating libraries in this region (driving distance) with these systems, so if
there are any libraries with other systems that are fully automated, please
respond.  Thank you very much! Oh- I need to mention that we are looking for a
library of comparable size, ie. 500,000 volumes and may be a public library if
it's mission includes providing some scholarly research.
Sarah Bryan
Head Cataloging Librarian
Torreyson Library
University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR  72035
sarahb@vm1.uca.edu on the Internet
(501) 450-5221 or 450-5248
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU