From: todd@refrig.dixie.com (Todd H.)
Subject: Robert's Goat Hangup
Organization: throw it on the floor - it's happier there.
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 14:24:51 GMT
Followup-To: alt.get.a.life.robert

black@che.serum.kodak.com (Robert Black (x37236)) writes:

>In article <1992Dec12.063205.14086@refrig.dixie.com> todd@refrig.dixie.com (Todd H.) writes:

>If you're really interested in pursuing this, then please cite some
>sources that I could follow up on.  All I know is what I heard from a
>news report at the time, and my memory sometimes plays tricks on me. 

if *I'M* interested??  You're the one who asked me, and made the statement that
if I didn't supply details, it would prove to the net that I'm a liar.  When
those details are supplied, you decide that things didn't go your way, so it's
time for the next delaying tactic - get a life, Robert.

Now, because *YOU'RE* interested, and you have a bad memory, call the Atlanta
Journal/Constitution research department, and have them look up the articles
for you.  Then call Noah's Ark Shelter in Locust Grove, Georgia, and ask them
about their ball-less killer goat.

My sources are the newspaper at the time, the TV news at the time, and an
ongoing harrassment that I've been taking from one of the employees at Noah's
Ark.  She's pissed because I train my dog only a few miles up the road from
the shelter, and have "brutally murdered many hundred innocent, loving,
trusting, and unsuspecting" quail to "dominate and force my dog to a life of
total slavery", in which I "brainwash" her into "chasing and killing poor
little birds that have no hope of surviving my high tech shotgun".

Believe me, putting up with your tripe is a damn sight easier than having the
fat woman drive by the field when the dog hits point.  "Noballs" is only one
of the issues I take with the place.

>>It also seems kinda strange to me that a goat that the ARWs claimed was beaten
>>until it couldn't walk could still stand up and kill a man.  Most goats don't
>>go over about 70 pounds, so it takes a pretty healthy goat to do any damage
>>to a full-grown human.  The ARWs also admitted that the goat showed no
>>*physical* signs of abuse at the time that they took charge of it, but they
>>were *sure* it had been abused.  I guess they all speak goat down there.

>If you're really interested in pursuing this, then please cite some
>sources that I could follow up on.

Try common sense.  Do YOU think a 70 pound goat with broken legs could kill a
man?  If you had a goat, and it showed *NO* signs of being beaten or physically
abused in any way, am I right in assuming that it was beaten, just because I
say so?

>Todd, you have a history of dredging up these incidents, reporting them
>without relevant details, flaming all "AR Whackos" (sic) in toto with
>your misinformation, and then ignoring followups.  What are you hoping
>to accomplish?  Anything productive?  Or are you just venting your
>frustrations?  If the latter, then why not go to alt.flame?

What a joke!!  You've gotta be kidding when you typed this, because it's a
mess.  

>"dredging up these incidents"  I cited an example of ARWhacko disregard for
human lives in the holy cause of saving individual animals.  It was a good
enough example, even your self-admitted failing mind remembered it.  You 
continue to beat the (unfortunately not dead) goat.

>"reporting them without relevant details"  I gave the relevant details for
the question at hand the first time, and you decided to expand the issue.  Then
you accuse me of not giving you enough details for your expanded questions
before you even asked them.

>"flaming all "AR Whackos" (sic)"  Guilty as charged, and proud of it.

>"misinformation"  You have yet to find *ANYTHING* that I'm saying to be false.
You, on the other hand, seem to be dismissing first-hand information on your
own predjudice against me.

>"then ignoring followups"  Huh???  I go out of town for a week to do some
honest WORK (remember that stuff - some of us do it), and when I come back
I find that you've dropped a silly ultimatum on me to respond to one of your
messages.  I did, and now I'm accused of "ignoring followups".  In case you
didn't see it, or you 'ignored' it, I said your ultimatum is BULLSHIT - just
like this one.

Keep it up, boy - you're starting to show your true colors as a budding ARW
propagandist.  The only thing you forgot is that *good* propogandists drop
thier shit on the unsuspecting public, and make certain that the unwashed
can't rebut the trash.  For a good example, see "Wheeler, Ferrell".

-- 
Todd++;
------------------
todd@refrig.dixie.com
**** I voted with the majority this past election - AGAINST Clinton! ****
Newsgroups: talk.politics.animals