HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v115p8d6@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Quenby M Chunco)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Why Horror? (was: Silence Lambs & Cape Fear Hysteria !!!)
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:28:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: acsu.1992Apr7.202857.9949
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr7.171858.14118@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>, dsc@gemini.tmc.edu (Doug S. Caprette Bldg. 28 W191 x3892) writes...
>>
>>  I'm not sure if the above is true, but horror films are notoriously easy to
>>sell and produce, and have catepulted many an actor or director to fame
>>and fortune. Francis Ford Coppola's directorial debut was a film called
>>"Dimentia 13". Humphrey Bogart's first film role was as a vampire (from whence
>>rumor has it he acquired the famous lip twitch). 

Bogart's lip twitch was from an old injury I've heard.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: spencer@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (S. Spencer Sun)
Subject: Re: Avalon: Awards/Nominations?
Originator: news@ernie.Princeton.EDU
Organization: Princeton Univ. Class of '94
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 21:28:18 GMT

In article <kud8n1INNj6j@aludra.usc.edu> jameskau@aludra.usc.edu (James Kaufman) writes:
>I'm pretty sure that all it got was a Best Original Screenplay nomination,
>which it didn't win.  I'm 99% sure that Mueller-Stahl wasn't up...
>I haven't seen AVALON yet.  Is it good?

I thought Avalon was an incredibly good movie, but then again, I'm
biased since I'm from Baltimore... seriously, I think it's well worth
seeing... good family movie.
----------
Spencer Sun - Princeton Univ. Class of '94 - Dept. of Computer Science
Clockwork Orange (Princeton Ultimate) (when I bother to show up for practice)
Playing bridge is like having sex.  You don't need a partner if you
have a good hand.
From: sking@wattres.San-Jose.CA.US (Steve King)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re-release of "Casablanca"
Date: 10 Apr 92 16:29:11 GMT
Distribution: rec.arts.movies
Organization: Steven Watt, Consultant   San Jose, CA, USA


This message is primarily directed to those in the San Francisco Bay
Area, although all may read it.



In the Merc's EYE section today, is an advertisement for "Casablanca"
at the Stanford theater.  Last night on "Entertainment Tonight," they
talked about a re-release of "Casablanca" by Turner Entertainment that
used the original negatives to make the movie look brand new.  They
also said that this new version would be releaseed in only a few major
markets, San Francisco being the closest, and in general release in a
couple weeks.  Now... my question is, is the version of "Casablanca"
at the Standford Theater this new print, or just a re-release of an
old print?  This makes a difference, i.e., why see an old print when I
can wait to see a new print.  Any ideas please email.  Thanks


Steve



-- 
Steve King       Domain:  SKing@Wattres.SJ.CA.US
                 Packet:  KC6WCH @ N6LDL.#NOCAL.CA.USA.NA
KC6WCH          "Dammit, Jim!  I'm a meteorologist, not a forecaster!"
               "Climate is what you expect.  Weather is what you get."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter)
Subject: Re: __A L I E N 3__ news
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 22:49:41 GMT

roby@brahms.udel.edu (Scott W Roby) writes:

>>of ALIEN 3 is.  And just to remind all of you out there, it is ALIEN 3  NOT
>>aliens3.  It isn't alien^3 either.  It is just ALIEN 3.  Period.

>Well, I wish someone would tell the editors of Fangoria magazine. 
>The current May issue lists it consistently as Alien^3 on page 10 
>and cover.

Someone had also better tell the folks who made all the posters for the
movie.


                                     --Steve Stelter
                                       sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu

Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:13229 rec.arts.sf.movies:3103
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Jennifer Connelly
Date: 7 Apr 92 19:27:49 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

In article <1992Apr7.105314.1@skcla.monsanto.com>, 
jjfink@skcla.monsanto.com writes:
> Jennifer Connelly debuted in "Labyrinth", the George Lucas/Jim Henson
> fantasy film featuring David Bowie, many muppets, and lots of great sets and
> characters designed by Froud and inspired by "Where the Wild Things Are".

BBBZZZZTTTTTTT!  Thanks for playing.  

Hopefully this will clear up alot of questions:

From:	IN%"uslave@mcl.mcl.ucsb.edu"  "KJS @ucsb.mcl" 
>     Once Upon A Time In America                1984
(She did have a body double in this film)
>     Creeepers (Phenomena)                      1985
>     Labyrinth                                  1986
>     Seven Minutes In Heaven                    1987
(Not released)
>     Some Girls                                 1988
(With Patrick Dempsey)
>     Etoile                                     1989
(Not released in US)
>     The Hot Spot                               1990
(The one with the nude scene in question, and yes it's her)
>     Career Opportunities                       1991
>     The Rocketeer                              1991

Thanks to Jesse Chang...THE #1 Jennifer Connely fan (It's his list).

Greg Bole	                    Maid Marian: "Why, you speak treason!"
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu         Robin Hood: "Fluently"
                                    From _The Adventures of Robin Hood_
From: rlm7638@tamsun.tamu.edu (Jack McKinney)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.sex.movies
Subject: Who starred in 'Rabid'?
Date: 12 Apr 92 15:22:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: tamsun.12248
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station


     A friend of mine is trying to remember the name of the star of a
movie she saw (a very bad one she also comments) called 'Rabid'. She
believes she has done some X-rated movies as well. 'Rabid' doesn't
appear to be listed in the actresses list, so I can't find her there.


+---------------------------------------------------+------------------------+
| "A lot of stuff in school... you don't appreciate | Jack McKinney          |
|  'til you get to be older, you know, little       | rlm7638@tamsun.tamu.edu|
|  things, like being spanked everyday by a middle- +------------------------+
|  aged woman... Stuff you'd pay good money for     | Blessed be the ties    |
|  later in life."      -Emo Philips                |      that bind...      |
+---------------------------------------------------+------------------------+
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: hoppersm@infonode.ingr.com (Marcia Hoppers)
Subject: More Letterbox Movies on AMC
Keywords: letterbox classics
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 19:29:37 GMT

American Movie Classics
Schedule of Letterbox Versions of Movies:

Spartacus	April 19   5:00 pm ET and 11:00 pm ET
Guys and Dolls 	April 29  10:00 pm ET and  3:30 am ET
War Wagon	May 24     9:00 pm ET and  3:00 am ET
		May 25    10:00 am ET
Days of Heaven 	June 23    5:00 pm ET and 11:00 pm ET


Marcia Hoppers
Huntsville, AL
hoppersm@infonode.ingr.com


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: beb@pt.com (Bruce Buck)
Subject: Re: Danny Kaye is God (was Re: Best Film Swordfights)
Organization: Performance Technologies, Incorporated
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 11:48:52 GMT

In article <wdsUW6200Uh7I5PHt7@andrew.cmu.edu> gl1e+@andrew.cmu.edu (Greg G Levrault) writes:
>My list so far:
>Wonder Man
>The Kid from Brooklyn
>The Court Jester
>Hans Christian Andersen
>White Christmas
>The Secret Life of Walter MItty
>Five Pennies(?)
>The Inspector General
>
>He also made a 70s Disney special and a Pinnochio TV movie, but cut down
>to dedicate time to UNICEF.
>He made appearences in Twilight Zone(80's) and Cosby Show before he died
>in 89(?)

When I first watched the annual showing of the Wizard of Oz in the early 60s
I can remember Danny Kaye introducing the movie and telling us not to adjust our
sets - B&W in the beginning and color in the Land of Oz.  It was all the same to
me - we had a B&W set.  I can only remember him doing this for a few years.

Anyone have more info on this (like specific years he did it)?
From: csroc@dime.prime.com (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Plug Pulled on Spike Lee's "Malcolm X"
Date: 13 Apr 92 13:39:59 GMT
Reply-To: csroc@dime.UUCP (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Organization: Prime Computervision, Bedford MA

>My feeling is that if he is 'going to the mat' for all this 'artistic'
>integrity he's nuts.  Its a film I feel no one wants to see any way..
>The 'whites' will stay away in DROVES...  

 I disagree!  Spike has found a fascinating subject, that's
fresh....especially for white audiences.....
In, Hollywood , timing is everything.  Spike will be the first to
do a big Hollywood production on one of the most controversial
figures of our time.  

 I feel this movie will be a huge success(or at least for the potential,
it's worth a big risk)..
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: aku@leland.Stanford.EDU (Andrew Chia-Tso Ku)
Subject: Steve Kloves....whatever happened to him?
Keywords: fabulous baker boys, racing with the moon
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 04:35:59 GMT

Does anyone know if Steve Kloves is currently working on a movie?  I'm
a cultish devotee of The Fabulous Baker Boys, his directorial debut
(made when he was twentysomething).  FBB came out in 1989, and since
then I haven't heard of him writing or directing anything new.  His
only other writing credit (to my knowledge) is Racing with the Moon,
which came out in the early '80s.

Andrew
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: daveshao@leland.stanford.edu (David Shao)
Subject: question about the music in Solaris
Originator: daveshao@leland.Stanford.EDU
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 02:11:06 GMT

Could someone tell me what is the opening music in Tarkovsky's 
science fiction movie Solaris.  I think the music was written by
Bach.



Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dnadams@isis.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams)
Subject: Re: DUNE...A minor classic?
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 13:09:55 GMT

napalm@next07wor.wam.umd.edu (Warren L. Mohn) writes:
^^^^^^
       how appropriate... :->

>dnadams@isis.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams) writes:
 >> I considered it a "classic" right from the very beginning...
 >A CLASSIC?, Dune?, you must be on drugs.  Or were when you saw it.

No such luck...<heh>

 >This piece of garbage passed off as science fiction is an insult 
 >to everyone who saw it.  

Wrong...  I know a lot of people who thought it was great.

 >Audiences should bring a class-action suit against the studio  
 >for releasing this film.  

Why aren't you saving this stuff for alt.flame?

 >Just because David Lynch, a very fine director, directed it and 
 >it had some nice visuals does not make it a classic.

I barely even knew who he was when I first saw it.

 >The story was simplified, lame and generally tried to pass itself 
 >off as intellectual when it was total bullshit.  You got suckered 
 >into believing the film's claim that it was sophisticated.  

That sounds like the total bullshit to me.

 >When I saw this in the theater the studio had the audacity to hand out  
 >little 2-3 page glossaries about the terms used in the movie, just in 
 >case you hadn't read the book.  

It seems they were right about the percentage of the audience who are
total morons that can't understand a story unless it is endlessly repeated 
right in their face.  I hadn't read more than a handful of pages from the 
book, and I had **NO** problem whatsoever understanding the film.  

 >It was trash.

Heh...  No, it was excellent.  Exceptionally interesting filmmaking.

 >And I think if you asked David Lynch about Dune, he'd probably 
 >deny he ever made it.

Nope...  About the only thing he would be "ashamed" of is that so many 
people were just too stupid to understand a film with a little more 
"depth" than the mindless tripe that usually comes out of Hollywood.

-{ DA }-
From: domalley@unix1.tcd.ie (Slartibartfast            (alias Daniel O'Malley))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Inept use of the network
Date: 11 Apr 92 22:15:56 GMT
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin

In <4807@umriscc.isc.umr.edu> wdechent@usenet.umr.edu (William L. Dechent) writes:

>Question:  I see all these posts where a person takes a prior post, and then
>responds by reproducing the prior post, and also inserting comments.  How is
>that done?  I've also seen people take my letters, and reply doing the same
>thing (with the > marks to show what I wrote.)  Could someone describe how
>this is done for all of us who don't know?  Thanks!

It's simple.
If you're using nn to read news, all you do is type f to post a
follow-up article, or r to mail a reply. You will get the prompt 
'Include original article?'
Typing 'y' here will read in the article concerned being read into
the message buffer with a > in the leading column.
Then you are free to butcher it whatever way you feel like.

In future, RTFM (Read The F***ing Manual).

Daniel.
--
+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+  |-----Daniel O'Malley-----|----"Look - I didn't mount an invasion just to----|  |-------------------------|-------whisk some flippin' eggs!", protested------|
|        //               |----the Supreme Dalek from the TARDIS kitchen.----|  |   ====//  ====    ====  |--------------------------------------------------|
| //   // //   // //   // |---"In the begining, the universe was created.----|  |  ===//   ===// //   //  |-This has made a lot of people angry and has been-|
|-------------------------|---------widely regarded as a bad move."----------|  |--domalley@unix1.tcd.ie--|----The Restaurant at the End Of The Universe-----|  +-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+
From: malc@pyramid.unr.edu (Malcolm L. Carlock)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: rollerball question
Date: 10 Apr 92 00:22:57 GMT
Reply-To: malc@pyramid.unr.edu (Malcolm L. Carlock)
Organization: Xinaian Tourist Bureau

In article <ru88qINN6hr@seven-up.East.Sun.COM> joneil@heretix.East.Sun.COM writes:
>on what books were the following movies based on:
>
>ROLLERBALL

"The Rollerball Murders" by William Harrison

>SOYLENT GREEN
   ^
"Make Room, Make Room!"  by Harry Harrison

I don't know if the above two gentlemen are related.  A discussion in
this group some time ago did seem to establish that they were, at least,
definitely not the same individual.
--
Malcolm L. Carlock                      Internet:  malc@unr.edu
                                        UUCP:      unr!malc
                                        BITNET:    malc@equinox
From: tmkk@uiuc.edu (Khan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Where does this stinking quote come from?
Date: 17 Apr 92 20:19:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Apr17.201903.12723
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana


In article <1992Apr17.185954.23302@nic.unh.edu> pss1@kepler.unh.edu (Paul S Secinaro) writes:
>"Badges?  We don't need no stinking badges!"
>
>The answer to this question is probably embarrassingly obvious, but can
>anyone tell me what movie the above line came from?

Blazing Saddles is the one you're thinking of, but I seem to recall that BS
used the line as a spoof of an earlier film (the title of which I have
conveniently forgotten).
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: sabotkap@woods.ulowell.edu (Pete Sabotka)
Subject: Re: Terminator 2 merchandising
Organization: University of Lowell
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 09:04:25 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.084347.2985@darwin.ntu.edu.au>, baz@pandanus.cs.ntu.edu.au (I feel good. dana nana na I knew that I would) writes:
> I was wondering if anyone had seen some T2 posters.
> More specific  One of Arnie with half a human head and half a metal head.
> or a poster of a scene at the start of the movie which shows a wall of flame 
> and the head of a terminatorappearing from the flames.
> 
> If anyone can tell me where i could get these from I would be most gratefull
> 	Thanks
> -- 
> 

I am pretty sure that Sam Goody (one in Salen, NH anyways had the poster
when Arnold was just "built" and they show him standing there with
red eyes, and half of his head is outlined with the metal skeleton of a 
terminator.  

You may want to check out any Sam Goody's in your area

pete
<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>
This is a .sig:                        This is a .sig in binary:
----                                   ----
Pete Sabotka, UMass-Lowell             @ma.L0^  _1f\|P"
  DECnet: WOODS::SABOTKAP              Ta#%HTQ*[  2S'pUq
Internet: sabotkap@aspen.ulowell.edu   1&#*  %^2E)A<!2I\\SNMs6YvdN~  

                             Any Questions ?
<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>
From: 00lranthony@bsu-ucs.uucp
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re:T2-Why didn't Sarah die???
Date: 7 Apr 92 14:02:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: bsu-ucs.1992Apr7.090245.5739


	One person asked why, in Terminator 2, did the evil terminator spare
Sarah when it was said earlier that it killed whatever shape it took on.  If
you remember the scene where he stabbed her, he was getting ready to kill her
when the original terminator showed up and the two of them started fighting. 
The only theory I can come up with is that, during the terminators' struggle,
Sarah crawled away.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: egnilges@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ed Nilges)
Subject: Re: Regarding Henry:Henry V vs Henry V: Shakespeare and Men's
Originator: news@ernie.Princeton.EDU
Organization: Princeton University
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 23:37:03 GMT

In article <28781@brahms.udel.edu> conrad@brahms.udel.edu (Jon Conrad) writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.162229.4877@Princeton.EDU> egnilges@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ed Nilges) writes:
>
>>In article <28752@brahms.udel.edu> conrad@brahms.udel.edu (Jon Conrad) writes:
>
>>>In article <1992Apr9.011042.27900@Princeton.EDU> egnilges@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ed Nilges) writes:
>
>>>>Axiom (feel free to argue): Shakespeare was a poet first, a dramatist
>>>>second.
>

>>>Not even close to an axiom.  A highly debatable personal opinion of
>>>yours.

Besides, Jon, here you are mistaken on the meaning of "axiom."  An axiom
is that which we assume, not prove.  My "feel free to argue" was an
invitation to dispute this.  Your riposte "a highly debatable personal
opinion of yours" is not an argument; because something is an opinion
does not make it wrong.  You now must show me that Shakespeare is a
dramatist first and only a poet second, since I claim that the reverse
is true.  I'll give you a tip: your arguments in favor of editing
Shakespeare's texts for performance seriously weaken your case.
From: parekhs@cs.cornell.edu (Sujay S. Parekh)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Jennifer Connelly
Date: 9 Apr 92 19:04:56 GMT
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853

Thanks to all the folks who replied. Didn't know that Jen would evoke
such a response ;-). I suppose I *have* so see Rocketeer
now...

-Sujay

INTERNET: parekhs@cs.cornell.edu        BITNET: ohd@crnlvax5

"There's no such thing as sanity; and that's the sanest fact" -- dIRE sTRAITS
From: tap1040@venus.tamu.edu (SPEED RACER)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jo Anne Worley
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:56:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <OLIVER.92Apr8200344@ballard1.mit.edu>, oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D. Oliver III) writes...
>In article <29E3711F.5900@noiro.acs.uci.edu> eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu (Virany Margaret Kreng) wrote:
>> During Beauty and the Beast, I found that the voice of the Wardrobe sounded
>> familiar and the credits listed the voice as belonging to Jo Anne Worley (sp?)
>> 
>> Can anybody tell me what else she might have been in?  Her name sounds familiar
>> too but I can't seem to place the face...
> 
>Oh, God.  Now I know it's time to retire and collect social security.
> 
>She was in "Laugh-In".  And a lot of other TV.  Some Broadway stuff.  Not
>much else.
> 
>(Please don't tell me you don't know what "Laugh-In" was.)



She is now a regular on "The New Hollywood Squares".  That is probably where
this person remembers her from.  Or some other game show she's been on, like
"Match Game". 

________________________________________________________________________________

                                 -SPEED RACER-                    
                                     Tracy      
                              Texas A&M University
                                   WHOOP!!!!
________________________________________________________________________________

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: tfagerqu@isis.cs.du.edu (Thomas R. Fagerquist)
Subject: Old British Movie
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 01:58:43 GMT


Greetings,

I am looking for info on an old British movie.  I think
the title was "Your Past is Showing."  If memory
serves me, it starred Peter Sellers, Terry-Thomas and
Margaret Rutherford.  The plot was the blackmail of these
3 stars and their attempts to kill the blackmailer.  Am I
imagining this movie?  Is it out on video tape?  Has it
been shown recently in the states?

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks

Tom
From: csroc@dime.prime.com (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: THE GOOD GUY GETS IT
Date: 15 Apr 92 16:26:16 GMT
Reply-To: csroc@dime.UUCP (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Distribution: na
Organization: Prime Computervision, Bedford MA

>> Has anyone else got any good examples of a film
>> that starts off in the usual way but the good guy gets it?
>
>    "To Live and Die in L.A." --  William Pederson is the Good Guy,
>    and he gets iced at the end of the movie.  It was a surprise
>    when it happened, but it fit pretty well with the flavor of
>    the movie.

NOT
William Pederson is half good/half ruthless.
He's on the "GOOD" side, but his actions
are unbounded, the ends justify the means.

It was a surprise when he got iced,
but I do not believe this to be a pure
example of when the good guy gets it!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rauser@fraser.sfu.ca (Richard John Rauser)
Subject: Re: New James Bond?
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 21:11:31 GMT


  This isn't true. Timothy Dalton has announced that work on his third Bond
flick is already underway after a hassle of legal battles. I can't see Mel
getting into the Bond clothing anytime soon...

--
Richard J. Rauser  "I like fighting Chun Li.
rauser@sfu.ca       Especially when I slide under her legs and glance up."
WNI                                        -Dhalsim
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Darkman - Crap (YES!)?
Date: 6 Apr 92 15:25:46 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

> This was probably the stupidest scene out of any movie I have ever seen.
> First of all the edit of him flying out of the exploding building was sooooo
> poor that I was almost sick.
Matt, I think you took this whole thing a little *too* seriously.
It made you sick? 

> This was unexceptable.
It was just a movie.  It doesn't have to be "acceptable".

> I can't remember how many edits were spiced in, but it was sick.
Was it really sick?  Or are you just using a *leetle* bit too much hyperbole?

Yeesh!  _Darkman_: it was corny, but fun.  It scares me that such a movies as
this could cause one to say it was unacceptable, and he got sick...

Greg Bole	                    Maid Marian: "Why, you speak treason!"
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu         Robin Hood: "Fluently"
                                    From _The Adventures of Robin Hood_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies