HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jverde@bunny.inescn.pt (Isidro Vila Verde)
Subject: Re: Help!  Peer-to-Peer Networking Question . . .
Organization: Inesc-Porto
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 11:39:06 GMT

In article <1993Jan17.213753.16762@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu> mcordes@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Matthew G. Cordes) writes:
>Xref: animal.inescn.pt comp.dcom.lans.ethernet:2544 comp.dcom.lans:6021
>Path: animal.inescn.pt!inesc.inesc.pt!mcsun!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsc!cbfsb!att-out!oucsboss!oucsace!mcordes
>From: mcordes@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Matthew G. Cordes)
>Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.dcom.lans
>Subject: Help!  Peer-to-Peer Networking Question . . .
>Message-ID: <1993Jan17.213753.16762@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu>
>Date: 17 Jan 93 21:37:53 GMT
>Organization: Ohio University CS Dept,. Athens
>Lines: 16
>
>I have three 3c501 cards.  What I would like to do is set up a small network
>between three computers in which each computer can access the hard drives
>and printers on the other two computers.  I would like full peer-to-peer type
>setup, not a server/workstation type.  Is this possible with 3c501 cards?    
	Yes.
>
>Also, if this is possible, what software would you suggest?	
	NetWare Lite. 
>
>thanks for you help,
>
>Matt
>-- 
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Matthew G. Cordes                | Ohio University College of Arts and Sciences
>mcordes@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu     | Zoological and Biomedical Science Dept.
>cordes@bobcat.ent.ohiou.edu      | Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 

We have 3 EtherExpress which allow share 3 hard disk and 1 printer connected 
to an PC.
We also need share ethernet card's with TCP/IP aplications. For that we using
an ODI drive providing by Intel for that card. I think that drive is not need
for 3com card's .

If you are interesting in that configuration let me know.

Isidro
jverde@animal.inescn.pt
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: rpratt@novell.com (Robert Pratt)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Subject: Re: LAN Analyzer recommendations.
Date: 25 Jan 93 18:48:01 GMT
Organization: Novell Inc., San Jose, Califonia

In article <jacksond.727983649@ogre> jacksond@ogre.cica.indiana.edu (Richard Jackson (Bmg)) writes:
>In <1993Jan21.190226.26403@novell.com> rpratt@novell.com (Robert Pratt) writes:
>
>>In article <1993Jan18.194350.5399@pencom.com> mike@pencom.com (Mike Heath) writes:
>>>
... a bunch of stuff from me in reply to the original question
>
>>Bob

>
>The Novell product at that price is strictly for Novell packets and not others.
>NetSight and the Triticom suite of products have both received good reviews
>in majors pubs of late (InfoWorld, Data Communications, PC Mag, etc).  They
>(the Intel and Triticom products) do a variety of protocols as well as Novell's.
>   Richard M. Jackson            Internet: jacksond@ogre.cica.indiana.edu

  Not to be too combative, but the above is not correct in that Novell's
product supports Appletalk and TCP/IP in addition to our own protocols.  
NetSight, Triticom's whatever its called, and LANalyzer for NetWare have
all gotten good reviews in pubs, who came out on top depends on which
magazine you prefer.  I certainly wasn't trying to say that Novell's
product is the only one to consider.  I prefer it, but then again I'm
biased in the matter.  
    In the low price analyzer market there are a bunch of quite nice
products, and I think everyone should select one based on a number of factors,
including what protocols you need, whether you prefer a Windows or DOS
product, and what other features the various gadgets offer that you are
looking for.

Bob
Bob Pratt                               | voice     : (408) 473-8274
Network Management Products Division    | Fax       : (408) 435-1706
Novell, Inc.                            | more voice: (800) 243-8526
2180 Fortune Drive, San Jose, Ca. 95131 | Internet  : rpratt@Novell.com
"It isn't that I can't help these people, it's that I don't want to."
Disclaimer:  I do not speak for Novell in any way, shape, or form.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: white@rtsg.mot.com (Rick White)
Subject: Re: Wireless LAN<->LAN connection?
Followup-To: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Organization: Motorola WDLD
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:42:18 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.212759.19071@alw.nih.gov>, donp@niaid.nih.gov (Don
Preuss) wrote:
> 
> cjc@nwu.edu (Christopher J. Chen) writes:
> 
> We use Motorola's solution (Altair Plus). It is a wireless spread-spectrum
> product. The latest incarnation should go three blocks (I vaguely remember 1/2 mile
> claimed). It runs at 3+ Mb/sec, and each end is a bridge. The only limitation is
> the number of stations on the remote side. It was limited to 32, and now is something
> a good bit higher. The product we have, the older altair unit, has been up
> for 9 months with zero downtime.
> 
> donp
> 

The wireless bridge solution, VistaPoint, has a throughput of 3.5 Mbps
simultaneous full duplex and can handle 1000 ethernet addresses on each
side. The Altair Plus and Plus II products are designed for end user
connectivity with a current throughtput of 5.7 Mbps.

Both products are 18 GHz wide-band systems.


Rick White                     |    Doing it without Wire
Motorola Inc                   |    Altair (tm) Wireless Ethernet
Wireless Data LAN Division     |    white@rtsg.mot.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: gjseo@june.kotel.co.kr (Seo GeunJoo)
Subject: 3C503 card question.
Organization: SNU SSLAB.
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 07:38:23 GMT


I have a problem with 3-com 503 ethernet cards.

I want to make ethernet bridge with two 3-com 503 cards on IBM PC

,but can't find software which support 3-com 503 card.


Pcbridge v 1.2 support 3c-507 card and wd cards, but does not support 3c-503 card.


please , help me ..



		  THANKS IN ADVANCE ... 



Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: vhalkka@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Vesa Halkka)
Subject: Re: Who says DELNIs and DEMPRs alter the specs.
Organization: University of Helsinki
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:55:26 GMT


I was some years ago at an ethernet seminar (Decus, Cannes).

The DEC guy gave data from every DEC box and DEC part numbered cables: 

delays etc, so that it was possible to calculate precisely every
number that has some min/max value in the ethernet spec.

It is really tedious and boring, but reveals how easy it is to
create a network that violates something..

The old DEC boxes follow DIX rules.. new rules allow more
repeaters in a row..

--
Vesa Halkka                       -O___/ 
University of Helsinki CC:         (  /   	 vhalkka@helsinki.fi 
Centre for scientific computing:  ~~~~~  	 vhalkka@csc.fi
From: muench-philip@math.yale.edu (Philip Muench)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Subject: Re: SQE Switch
Date: 23 Jan 1993 14:37:34 -0500
Organization: Yale University Mathematics Dept., New Haven, CT 06520-2155
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: cantor.math.yale.edu

In article <1993Jan13.114332.1@ptavv.llnl.gov> oberman@ptavv.llnl.gov writes:
>In article <1993Jan12.021516.16311@nma.mnet.uswest.com>, ftarnol@nmastaff.mnet.uswest.com (Fred Arnold (303) 896-8084) writes:
>
>But what if you plug a repeater into a DELNI? You can disable CPT by using an
>802.3 MAU with SQE disabled. or, if you don't use the master port, turn it on
>and plug an Ethernet loopback connector into the master port. In either case,
>CPT is disabled to ALL PORTS! No way to enable it on only certain ports.
>
Strictly speaking, is it not SQE TEST (rather than SQE, signal quality error)
that is disabled? Does the MAU not continue to signal SQE when it detects
actual collisions and cable breaks?
-Philip Muench
 muench@cantor.math.yale.edu 128.36.23.2
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: simon@moscow.uidaho.edu (Mike Simon)
Subject: Re: 100MBPS ENET
Organization: University of Idaho CS Dept.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 02:37:34 GMT

If anyone's really interested, there's a pretty good article on some of
the 100-Mbps ethernet proposals in the November 16, 1992 issue of "Open Systems 
Today".  As Rich ETAL said, there ARE no current implementations, just
standards proposals.  Personally, I lean t'words changes at the MAC layer,
to more logically support real time services (like video) and such,
but as it's been pointed out, then you don't really have ethernet...


Mike Simon				simon@moscow.uidaho.edu
Computer Science Dept.
Moscow, Idaho
From: rmascaro@uniwa.uwa.edu.au (Robert Mascaro)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Subject: ethernet card drivers
Date: 26 Jan 1993 09:30:08 +0800
Organization: The University of Western Australia
NNTP-Posting-Host: uniwa.uwa.edu.au
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

In my job I have come across 2 types of driver software for cards we
have (3com, wdigital). W digital (for TCP) ask you have two .sys files in
config.sys which have configured to base(shared) address, the irq and
the i/o address. The 3com cards you do this by just running the driver
with the appropriate paramters listed above.
My question is, why are the 2 methods different (how??) ,
 how does the
shared address (above 640k) work, how and why is the i/o address at 300h
or 280h etc. 
I dont understand how it all fits together, although I dont seems to
have much trouble configuring them.
Please help.
Regards,
Rob.
From: andor@inode.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Subject: 100MBPS ENET
Date: 26 Jan 93 09:20:20 EST
Reply-To: andor@inode.com
Distribution: world
Organization: inode BBS, NYC's Best Usenet Access (212-679-9146)

Has anyone out there been using/testing the new 100Mbps ethernet? 

Opinions? Feedback? How well does it work? What kind of thruput do you get?
Collision rates? etc...


--- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10
#! rnews 2
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: Buehler@worldbank.org (Paul Buehler)
Subject: Cisco & FOIRL Solution?
Organization: World Bank
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:41:03 GMT

 I've been looking for a good solution for connecting FOIRL ethernet
connections to an AGS+. I've been using the MEC-6 AUI interfaces and
currently use a Canary MX FOIRL transceiver for each interface. This
is somewhat flimsy but gets the job done. I would really like to rack
mount transceivers for this, what does the rest of the world do for
this insane arrangement?
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: seifert@netcom.com (Rich Seifert)
Subject: Re: 100MBPS ENET
Organization: Networks & Communications Consulting
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:33:50 GMT

In article <JAS.93Jan26145441@mcgarret.proteon>, jas@mcgarret.proteon (John A. Shriver) writes:
> Considering that the people doing this have set some ridiculous
> up-front requirements, like no change in frame format or size, they
> are already seriously curtailed in what they can acheive.  1500 bytes
> was too small a frame at 10 mbps, it will be ridiculous at 100 mbps.
> For high bits/second throughput, big frames are critical.  The
> software overhead is mostly per frame, not per byte.
> 

There have been no such requirements set by the study group. The group
has just barely begun to work on the OBJECTIVES for a standard.
I am sure that maximum frame size will be discussed.



-- 
Rich Seifert                    Networks and Communications Consulting
seifert@netcom.com              (408) 996-0922
                                (408) 996-2860 FAX
"... specialists in Local Area Networks and Data Communications systems"
From: scoggin@delmarva.com (John K Scoggin Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Subject: Re: 100MBPS ENET
Date: 26 Jan 1993 17:13:07 GMT
Organization: Delmarva Power & Light Company
Distribution: world
Reply-To: scoggin@delmarva.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: mercury.delmarva.com

In article 23@inode.com, andor@inode.com () writes:
> Has anyone out there been using/testing the new 100Mbps ethernet? 
> 
> Opinions? Feedback? How well does it work? What kind of thruput do you get?
> Collision rates? etc...
> 
> 
> --- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10
> #! rnews 2

Considering the fact that the IEEE Working Group has just begun to work on a
standard, anything in the field at this point is at best a "contender" - there
is no real product when there isn't even a Draft Standard...

	- John

---
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+    
|  John K. Scoggin, Jr.			Email: scoggin@delmarva.com   |
|  Supervisor, Network Operations       Phone: (302) 451-5200         |
|  Delmarva Power & Light Company       Fax:   (302) 451-5321         |
|  500 N. Wakefield Drive               NOC:   (800) 388-7076         |
|  Newark, DE 19714-6066		                              |
|  The opinions expressed are not those of Delmarva Power, simply the |
|  product of an over-active imagination...                           |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: raj@cup.hp.com (Rick Jones)
Subject: Re: ethernet vs token ring performance
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:13:00 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

It is important to remember that not all token rings are created
equal. They come in 4 mb/s and 16 mb/s. So, a comparison between 4
mb/s token ring and 10 mb/s Ethernet will not likely arrive at the
same conclusion as a comparison between a 16 mb/s token ring and that
same 10 mb/s Ethernet...

Caveat Networkor...

rick jones
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: donp@niaid.nih.gov (Don Preuss)
Subject: Re: Wireless LAN<->LAN connection?
Organization: National Institutes of Health
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:27:59 GMT

cjc@nwu.edu (Christopher J. Chen) writes:

We use Motorola's solution (Altair Plus). It is a wireless spread-spectrum
product. The latest incarnation should go three blocks (I vaguely remember 1/2 mile
claimed). It runs at 3+ Mb/sec, and each end is a bridge. The only limitation is
the number of stations on the remote side. It was limited to 32, and now is something
a good bit higher. The product we have, the older altair unit, has been up
for 9 months with zero downtime.

donp


>Does anyone have any pointers on using wireless technology 
>to connect LANs?  I need to connect two Ethernet LANs that
>are 3 blocks away and phone lines are not an option.

>I'm aware of PerSoft's solution, and NCR's solution.  Any
>others?


>cjc
>--
>Christopher J. Chen  cjc@nwu.edu  (708) 491-4109  (708) 491-3824 fax
>Academic Computing and Network Services, Northwestern University
>"The bogosity in a field equals the bogosity imported from related
> areas, plus the bogosity generated internally, minus the bogosity
> expelled or otherwise disposed of."    -- K. Eric Drexler
From: kanderse@cvbnet.prime.com (Kurt Andersen x3056 5-2)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Subject: NDIS on DRDOS
Date: 27 Jan 93 21:35:22 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Computervision Inc.

Has anyone been able to get NDIS 2.XX protocol stack to
run on DRDOS 6.0.  It hangs during bootup.  It doesn't
hang when I boot with a MSDOS 5.0.  I'm using a
SMC Elite 16 Ethernet Card.  I doubt it is the ethernet MAC driver
since (SMCMAC.DOS), it never reaches the driver.  It hangs on two
different computers.  a Gateweay 33Mhz 486, Phoenix bios, micronics
motherboard and a home built 386sx, AMI bios, JDR motherbaord.

Any NDIS/DRDOS experiences would be apprecited.

Thanks,

Kurt
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: seifert@netcom.com (Rich Seifert)
Subject: Re: address of KALPANA?
Organization: Networks & Communications Consulting
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:28:35 GMT

In article <hoens.727956719@gmd.de>, hoens@gmd.de (Guenter Hoens) writes:
> could any kind soul tell me the address of the manufacturer of the
> kalpana switch.
> 

Kalpana is located at:

3100 Patrick Henry Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95054

(408) 988-1600
(408) 988-1361 fax



-- 
Rich Seifert                    Networks and Communications Consulting
seifert@netcom.com              (408) 996-0922
                                (408) 996-2860 FAX
"... specialists in Local Area Networks and Data Communications systems"
From: lam@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu (Ken Lam)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,misc.forsale.computers.pc-clone
Subject: Wanted: Thin(Cheap/10B2) ethernet(prefer WD compatibles)
Date: 24 Jan 93 15:34:09 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.C1D78x.5KI
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

I need to purchase some thin-ethernet cards.

Even if you only have one(esp. WD) please reply to me.

Thanks..Ken Lam 
--
Ken Lam               \ (803)-884-7615 (H) \ "People who don't believe in
Systems Administrator   \ 803)-792-4969 (W)  \ miracles, don't belong in the
UNIX**Netware**Multimedia \ (803)-792-5446 (F) \ business."
Integrated Technical Systems\ lam@jove.cofc.edu  \ "Of course it works!" 
MultiMedia Works & Video Productions ======= Teaching the world in better ways
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.misc
From: seifert@netcom.com (Rich Seifert)
Subject: Re: 802.11
Keywords: LAN, 802.11, Standard
Organization: Networks & Communications Consulting
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 00:51:27 GMT

In article <giese.727450980@k9.dev.cdx.mot.com>, giese@k9.dev.cdx.mot.com (Bruce Giese) writes:
> 
>   Just out of curiosity, what sort of LAN technology corresponds
> to 802.11?  Is this 100baseT?
> 

802.11 is the Working Group for Wireless LAN standard development.

-- 
Rich Seifert                    Networks and Communications Consulting
seifert@netcom.com              (408) 996-0922
                                (408) 996-2860 FAX
"... specialists in Local Area Networks and Data Communications systems"
From: scoggin@delmarva.com (John K Scoggin Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.misc
Subject: Re: Multi-drop Serial Protocol Wanted (RS-2
Date: 28 Jan 1993 15:15:57 GMT
Organization: Delmarva Power & Light Company
Distribution: world
Reply-To: scoggin@delmarva.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: mercury.delmarva.com

In article 26423@seachg.uucp, burke@seachg.uucp (Michael Burke) writes:
> In article <1993Jan24.181433.26225@rosevax.rosemount.com> bill@texan.rosemount.com (William Hawkins) writes:
> >>jdc@isis.cs.wayne.edu (Jon Cardwell) writes:
> >>+---------------
> >>| We're looking for sources or references for a "multi-drop serial protocol"
> >>| i.e. one that allows multiple devices to be attached to the same serial line.
> >
> >RS-232 is not a multi-drop protocol *electrically* because it holds
> >the line at the mark (or space) state.  
> 
> Hogwash...
> 
> RS232 has been used for years with BSC 3270 multi-drop circuits. Generally,
> the trick is to use the fastest modem turn around time possible to get best
> results. The "poll-ack" protocols are above this physical standard.
> 
> Remember, multi-drop does not mean a "bus architecture" in the strictest
> sense. One orders a multi-drop circuit from the Telco. I have not been
> involved with BSC 3270 circuits for many years (about 15) so I have no idea
> how one would go about building an in-house multi-drop circuit....
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---
> Michael Burke
> 
> Sea Change Corporation
> 6695 Millcreek Drive, Unit 8 
> Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5N 5R8
> Tel: 416-542-9484  Fax: 416-542-9479
> UUCP: ...!uunet!uunet.ca!seachg!burke

The easiest way of building such a circuit is to use a central modem 
(constant carrier), an analog bridge (with n+1 ports, where n is the
number of remote stations), and n number of 4-wire modems at the far
end (SWITCHED carrier).  The remote stations would need to assert the
Request-to-Send lead in order to transmit.  The use of 4-wire circuits
and the proper modems ( with short RTS-CTS delays) will result in a 
decent system.  We do this routinely for alarm transponder circuits.

	- John

---
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+    
|  John K. Scoggin, Jr.			Email: scoggin@delmarva.com   |
|  Supervisor, Network Operations       Phone: (302) 451-5200         |
|  Delmarva Power & Light Company       Fax:   (302) 451-5321         |
|  500 N. Wakefield Drive               NOC:   (800) 388-7076         |
|  Newark, DE 19714-6066		                              |
|  The opinions expressed are not those of Delmarva Power, simply the |
|  product of an over-active imagination...                           |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.misc,comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: quodling@stimpy.enet.dec.com
Subject: Re: Clarkson 11.x drivers
Organization: SPR Alpha Migration Centre
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 01:15:08 GMT

In article <1993Jan19.232708.9907@asns.tredydev.Unisys.COM>, mkain@asns.tredydev.unisys.com (Mike Kain) writes:
> Questions:  Are the Clarkson 11.x drivers available yet?  I have a device
> driver for an Exos 205, and I need one for an exos 105-t.  I've heard that
> it is in the 11 version (and the two obviously aren't compatible).
> 

Or for that matter, Clarkson drivers with 3C509 support?


-- 
Peter Quodling		         Internet:     quodling@stimpy.enet.dec.com
SPR Alpha Migration Centre       UUCP: ...!decwrl!stimpy.enet!quodling
Sydney, Australia                Phone: 61-2-561 7272           _--_|\
Digital Equipment Corporation                                  /Aussie\
SNO1-3/C4                                                      \_.--._/
                                 I Said it, not them                 v
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.lans.misc:1142 comp.protocols.misc:960 comp.sources.wanted:5782 comp.sys.misc:1073
From: rpw3@rigden.wpd.sgi.com (Rob Warnock)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.misc,comp.protocols.misc,comp.sources.wanted,comp.sys.misc
Subject: Re: Multi-drop Serial Protocol Wanted (RS-232)
Date: 23 Jan 93 06:02:32 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.  Mountain View, CA

jdc@isis.cs.wayne.edu (Jon Cardwell) writes:
+---------------
| We're looking for sources or references for a "multi-drop serial protocol"
| i.e. one that allows multiple devices to be attached to the same serial line.
| Our goal is to have data exchanged between a host cpu and any number of
| ( well ok, 8 :) attached slave devices. ... Any help (even remote references
| from 15 years ago) would be most welcome.
+---------------

Well, 15-year-old stuff (or 20-yr-old) is indeed where you should look! ;-}

Many "ancient" serial protocols allowed multi-drop: BSC ("BiSync"), SDLC,
DDCMP, to name just a few. And the phone company provided leased lines
in multi-dropped configurations. It was quite common to have a central
location in, say, Chicago, with a multi-drop line that hit Kansas City,
Dallas, Abilene, and another one that hit Atlanta, Jacksonville, Miami, &c.

As far back as 1973 or -4, at Dig. Comm. Assoc. we were shipping statistical
multiplexers that could multi-drop off a single sync phone line (e.g., using
Bell 208 or 209 modems). That is, each multi-dropped mux could have multiple
local terminals, all running to the same host via a "head end" mux. The muxes
used our own implementation of DEC's DDCMP as the link-layer protocol (as
we'd call it today), but if I did it again today, I'd probably use HDLC (only
because so few current programmers are familiar with DDCMP, which is really
quite nice).


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock, MS-9U/510		rpw3@sgi.com
Silicon Graphics, Inc.		(415)390-1673
2011 N. Shoreline Blvd.
Mountain View, CA  94043
From: tom@rsp.UUCP (Thomas Ruf)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.misc
Subject: Re: 802.2 frames with DSAP 0xE0
Date: 22 Jan 93 19:24:23 GMT
Organization: RSP Datensysteme, W-Germany

ppan@nobeltech.se (Per Andersson) writes:
>out what they are. Most of them have a DSAP and SSAP that has
>a value of 'E0'. 
Novell NetWare uses E0 as SSAP/DSAP for the IPX protocol.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Ruf	tom@rsp.de	Schneider & Koch GmbH
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.lans.misc:1146 comp.protocols.misc:965 comp.sources.wanted:5796 comp.sys.misc:1079