HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sjc@cs.purdue.EDU (Steve Chapin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Gramm
Date: 21 Aug 92 21:58:48 GMT
	<1992Aug20.152852.23556@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>
	<1992Aug20.220036.12688@hou.amoco.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University

}} In article <1992Aug20.220036.12688@hou.amoco.com> zcjm0f@wwnv42.uucp (CJohn Mace) writes:
}} 
}} ps - am I not an aggie?  I never finished my degree there, but did go there
}} 	for seven years...

If ever a sentence summed up aggieness, I think that is it.

sjc@cs.purdue.edu               Steve Chapin           Today's Grammar Lesson:
                      I advise that you take his advice.

               Help stamp out variable length protocol headers!
From: zcjm0f@wwnv42.uucp (CJohn Mace)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Schedule determines #1
Keywords: nn
Date: 12 Aug 92 18:46:04 GMT
Organization: Amoco Production

>>Corn State for 13 games.  :-)  With the downfall of the LSU program, and 
>				^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Excuse ME!  OK.  LSU has had a few lackluster years; but lackluster
>years does not a weak opponent make.  History review:
>
>1986	@LSU	~9-2		LSU 35-17
>1987 	@A&M	10-1-1		LSU 17-3
>1988	@LSU	8-3		LSU 27-0
>1989	@A&M	4-7		A&M 28-16
>1990	@LSU	5-6		LSU 17-8  <====
>1991	@A&M	5-6		A&M 45-7 (ouch)
>
>Maybe the Tigers aren't quite back in full swing, but you can bet they'll 
>be over .500, and tough at home (void Bama).
>
>So STAND up for your schedule cmuck, and I'll see you Sept 5!!!!!!!!!
>
The schedule was fine when LSU was 8-3 or better and in the top 20.  LSU
was never the problem, the problem comes with teams like Southwest
Louisiana and North Texas State being in it also.  A&M historically
schedules a couple of patsies in non-conference games and then a good
team or two, which is fairly common among Div IA schools.  When your
one tough non-conference team stumbles for a few years, it gives your
schedule a perception of weakness.  The A&M-LSU game is a great natural
rivalry that I would like to see go on for a long time, anything can 
happen in an A&M/LSU game, but if the combined record of our non-conference
opponents is an average of 4-7, it doesn't help matters.  LSU's record
has an almost nil effect on the rivalry, but does affect A&M heavily 
  ----<edited> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^--or on the winner of the game.  :-(
when it comes to the polls.  It will be great when Curly returns the
program to its former days..  However, I could live with a few more 
W's by A&M at the same time..  :-)  No way will this years game be a
runaway, but I do expect a great game with A&M edging LSU.  We have
to break you home winning streak against us sometime, it might as well
be now.

For a great example of how records affect rivalries, check out the 
Texas-Oklahoma rivalry.  Both of those teams have had teams that weren't
as good as what they are used to, but gee, when that date in the Cotton
Bowl rolls around, you would never know it.

cmuck

ps- the 2 year Oklahoma/A&M stint is going to be real interesting, I 
    just wish it started this year.

come to think about it, a lot of traditional powers have had less than
stellar seasons as of late.  Anyone (Mark, goob) have a list with 
schools with the longest streak of having .500 or better seasons?
I would also be interested in how long the Ags have had .500 or better
seasons, although I would have to concede that it will be no where 
near the top of the list.  I would expect that to be Nebraska or 
something, probably dating back to the 60's, maybe the 50's.  What
about Penn State?  They had a couple of stumbling years a few years
ago, but did they dip below .500?  Inquiring minds want to know 
(actually, I am just bored out of my skull and pondering)  :-)
From: ty.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Most rushing yards this year?
Date: 18 Aug 92 22:07:51 GMT
Organization: Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton

train09@meaddata.com (Training ID9) writes:

> 
>    Who do you think will have the most rushing yards/passing yards this year?

The Missile
(syracuse)

-Ty Detmer

/\  Ty Detmer - Quaterback, BYU
\/  Heisman Trophy Winner
From: valdis@spica.usc.edu (Valdis Kalejs)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: USC Football
Date: 16 Aug 1992 11:35:12 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: spica.usc.edu



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Which would you choose??
Summary: 
Expires: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Keywords: 

In article <92224.094356ENVIRON@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> ENVIRON@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU writes:
>In article <l8e5ndINNjsu@skat.usc.edu>, valdis@skat.usc.edu (Valdis Kalejs)
>says:
>>
>>THE BRUINS SUCK! Pure and simple. Who has done your scheduling over the
>>years? First you had that always tough Long Beach St that were always
>>at the top of the polls, and this year...WOW what a home opener...CAL
>>ST. FULLERTON! Wait...you mean they have a football team? News to me..
>>When are you going anyone great (besides SC) to fill the Rose Bowl for
>>a game. Who are playing in you opener next year?...Pacoima High??
>>
>>Valdis R. Kalejs
>>(#1 USC Football Fan)
>
>     You said it!  It takes a real pansy team to schedule openers like, oh,
>I don't know, Memphis State or something, where they can be absolutely sure
>they're going to pick up an easy win...
>
>Brett

Brett,

Maybe so Brett, Maybe so! But at least Memphis St. has a football team that
still exists. I recall Long Beach's program passed away pretty much after
George Allen did. 

Fight On,
Valdis Kalejs


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: zcjm0f@wwnv42.uucp (CJohn Mace)
Subject: Re: Schedule determines #1
Keywords: n
Organization: Amoco Production
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 13:35:24 GMT

>
>Let us have a Cardinal for dinner, first. Did I say "for" dinner? I meant
>AS dinner. Then we can have a tiger for a lite snack.
>
>James - :) :) :) :)

oh no, not the "we're not birds" thread again...  :-)

cmuck
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: daytrpr@max.u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: Who voted Miami #3?
Organization: 
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 19:52:48 GMT



In article <2766.382.uupcb@brent.uucp>, al.sorhaindo@brent.uucp (Al Sorhaindo) writes:
> Were any logical guesses made here on who voted Miami #3 in
> last season's final coach's poll?

It didn't make any real difference anyway.

> 
> 
> I believe it was then California coach Bruce Snyder.
> 
I wouldn't doubt it.

> 
> The circumstantial evidence;
> 
> Bruce carried a grudge from the 1989, and 1990 beatings his team
> received from Miami. The 1990 game was especially noteworthy because
> of Miami's showboating and taunting, in which the Hurricanes even
> surpassed their own reputation for trash. (Probably because they
> were coming off that loss to BYU. Erickson was to say to his players
> after the game, "Act like you've been there (the endzone) before.")
> 
> Snyder wanted to boost a fellow Pac-10 team, Washington.

Um, Snyder doesn't necessary love UW, either.  Of course he does probably
respect the program at UW more, and rightfully so!    :)

> 
> Helping Washington achieve #1 could allow Snyder to say that his
> school gave the #1 team their toughest game.
> 
> He needed the #2 slot in the poll for his own team, California.
> 
> In the post game press conference after the 1990 Miami at Cal game,
> a reporter who was very impressed with Miami gushed to Bruce,
> "How good is Miami?", Snyder responded, "There are at least four teams
> in the Pac-10 better than Miami." The stunned pressroom gave Snyder
> a chance to backoff that statement, but he was adamant, Miami was inferior
> to at least four Pac-10 schools. Anyone as irrational as that is definately

Sure...that year he probably meant USC, UW, and um, um... Oregon, yeah that's
it!     :)


> capable of voting Miami #3 in last seasons final poll.
> 
> 
>                                                  Al
> 
> al.sorhaindo@execnet.com
> ---
>  . DeLuxe. 1.21 #11688 . al.sorhaindo@execnet.com
>                                                                                                              


-Steve
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mln@sunkj.larc.nasa.gov (Michael L Nelson)
Subject: Re: Which would you choose??
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA  USA
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 18:32:40 GMT

Cliff writes:

>Why Mr. Swanger, that would be Washington State, of course.  The Husky 
>Cougar battles in the Apple Cup are legends around these parts, but I suppose
>that the Apple Cup is a poor victim of the vicious ECMB.

Well, I for one would like to know more about it.  I would guess that
UW would hold a significant advantage, or does the fact that it is a
state rivalry make the series more even?

Do both schools get up for the game?  Is the rivalry pretty much 2-way?

I suppose the absence of the WSU fans on the net has kept this
"apple cup" pretty quiet.

Please enlighten us right coasters...

Michael Nelson
From: ENVIRON@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Fair Weather Fans
Date: 19 Aug 92 16:35:47 GMT
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

In article <l932seINNgg8@spica.usc.edu>, valdis@spica.usc.edu (Valdis Kalejs)
says:
>times,then drops out of sight when things aren't going so well. But what would
>Cardinal fans know what support and loyalty REALLY mean?
>
     Wow, you are still *really* pissed off that Stanford embarrassed SC in
LA last year, aren't you?

Brett
From: ddn@cbnews.cb.att.com (david.d.nason)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Buckeye News
Date: 21 Aug 92 13:58:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Aug20.122754.1@pa621a.inland.com> copus@pa621a.inland.com writes:
>
>I heard yesterday from a friend of mine who lives in Columbus that
>the freshman running back from Massillon, Travis McGuire, was moved
>to defensive back.  As one might expect we reportedly is not happy
>about that.  Do you know anything about that move?

Yep, McGuire was asked to move to defensive back.  He immediately
proceeded to leave school and go home to Massillon.  As of yesterday,
he had still not returned although Cooper reported that he had talked to
him and he was supposed to have come back.  There's just too much
congestion at tailback.  Robert Smith has reportedly been burning it
up.  You've got Harris (who sprained his ankle yesterday) and
By'not'e.  They even had to move Eddie George (who has reportedly been very
impressive) to backup Fullback behind Cothran.

>
>I also heard that the Cleveland Plain Dealer is reporting that the
>starting QB for the Louisville game will be Herbstreit.  Stablein was
>reported as saying that Herbstreit threw every day during the summer
>and is throwing the ball as well as any quarterback in the country and
>therefore should be the starter.  I also understand that Stablein and
>Herbstreit are close friends and unless Kirk has improved a lot 
>by hard work during the off season I can imagine him throwing that
>well.

I don't think anything is cast in stone, but I think it's a safe bet
that Herbstreit will start.  He did indeed stick around this summer
and work a lot on his throwing with Stablein.  Herbstreit is
co-captain with Tovar this year.  The players reportedly really
like him.  He has experience.  He's a good athelete.  Despite
Herbstreit's performance in the Hall of Fame game, I always felt
more comfortable with Herbstreit than Graham.  Herbstreit seemed
like a guy who could make things happen (witness his runs against
Wisconsin and Minnesota) - Graham always seemed like a disaster
waiting to happen to me.  Don't think for a minute though, that
if he's not getting the job done, Hoying won't get his chance.

david
From: tannerg@milton.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Huskies vs. Miami in '94?
Date: 20 Aug 92 21:50:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Aug20.215038.20987
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

>Saw someting on the wire that the University of Washington and University of
>Miami have scheduled meetings begining in '94  Husky & Canes fans,any truth
>to the rumor??
>
>Valdis

Can't say for sure.  The only thing people are talking about up here is how
scared they are of USC.

GT
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason Fawcett)
Subject: Re: Who do you think will win
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 17:36:00 GMT
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation

rszczerb@purcell.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba) writes:

>In article <Bt1CHC.ADr@acsu.buffalo.edu> v262xxve@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Timothy C Pitts) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug15.020042.9635@news.nd.edu>, pszymans@bronte.helios.nd.edu (peter szymanski) writes...

>> From Tim;
>>I do agree that none of these teams are of the caliber that the mighty Canes
>>should be playing, but the NFL refuses to schedule them, thus they are left
>>to play such panty-waist, nancy-boy teams as ND.

>rszczerb@purcell.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba) writes:
>Gee, if Miami considers ND to be a bunch of panty waists, then why were
>they crying so much when the Irish didn't renew the series with them. 

Money, the game has a value of 1.8 Million.  Also, Miami likes to beat ND.

>As for the mightly Canes playing some NFL teams ... I think you've been
>putting a little too much sugar on your cornflakes at breakfast.  Let's
>face it, the Canes are good, but the worst NFL team would still kick
>their butts.

Jimmy Johnson was ask this year how his last Hurricane team would have
done in the NFL.  Jimmy said that his last Miami team could not only
have beat the slowpolks cowboy (1-15) team he got his first year in
Dallas, but he would have run the score up on them with Miami.  JJ 
said on the Dallas astoturf speed is needed to play a fast team. How
can you hit what you can't catch.   JJ said his first Cowboy team could
not even catch the Cane's linemen running up field.

>But time will tell, if Miami can finish their "grueling" schedule with
>a fairly respectable record, they might get the privilege to play 
>the Irish in the Fiesta Bowl ... that is, if they decide to leave
>the comfy confines of the Orange Bowl to play a real team on Jan. 1st.
>:)		:)				:)

That is if the Notre Dame doesn't fix the bowl selections again, or run
away from the Hurricanes again.  ;-)  8^}



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: martyp@engin.umich.edu (Martin Pochmara)
Subject: Re: 1993 Michigan Schedule??
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 92 14:33:43 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Distribution: usa

Here is the 1993 Michigan Football Schedule

Sept. 11	NOTRE DAME
Sept. 18	WASHINGTON STATE
Sept. 25	HOUSTON
Oct.  02	IOWA
Oct.  09	@Michigan State
Oct.  16	@Penn State
Oct.  23	ILLINOIS
Oct.  30	@Wisconsin
Nov.  06	PURDUE
Nov.  13	@Minnesota
Nov.  20	OHIO STATE
Jan.  01	@Pasadena

Remember, this is next years schedule, NOT this years!!!!

1992 Schedule

Sept. 12	@Notre Dame
Sept. 19	OKLAHOMA STATE
Sept. 26	HOUSTON
Oct.  03	IOWA
Oct.  10	MICHIGAN STATE 
Oct.  17	@Indiana
Oct.  24	MINNESOTA
Oct.  31	@Purdue
Nov.  07	@Northwestern
Nov.  14	ILLINOIS
Nov.  21	@Ohio State

GO BLUE!!!!!


				Marty
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Beavers will win MNC fer sure!
Keywords: Oregon State, Champion, MNC, fair weather crap
Date: 19 Aug 92 20:14:45 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Chevron

(Tom Krall) writes:
>|> (Yvonne Lee) writes:
>|> >THE OREGON STATE BEAVERS WILL WIN THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP!
>
>Poor misguided Yvonne, she failed to forcast that the OREGON STATE BEAVERS
>(The real OSU ?) will lose to the mighty MINNESOTA GOLDEN GOPHERS in that
>dam Rose bowl.  ;^)
>
>Question: Whats the best part of being a Golden Gopher football fan ?
>Answer: Your never disappointed when they lose ! ;^)
>
>Any others ?
>
>-Tom

Uhhhh.  Your bookie pays YOU when they lose?

-- 
*************************************************************************
GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!!      | "That haircut of yours might be city-style,
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!!!!      |  but your heart is shaped like a bowl."
James Clyde     LSU '91   |             -- Briscoe Darlin, T.A.G.S.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rszczerb@milton.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Subject: Re: Schedule determines #1
Organization: University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 19:40:19 GMT

In article <Bsxq28.GHn@acsu.buffalo.edu> v262xxve@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Timothy C Pitts) writes:
>In article <65833@hydra.gatech.EDU>, mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes...
>#      My guess is Oklahoma or Nebraska has had the most
>#consecutive winning seasons.
>
>Good guess, Mark.  Those are the only two teams to have winning records
>over the past twenty years.  I don't know how far back they go before that
>(I only have records back to 1973), though.
>


Does anyone have any information about the loggest unbeaten
streaks in college football (as opposed to the longest winning streaks)? 

I think ND and Oklahoma have had some pretty long ones in
their history.
From: stricher@masig.fsu.edu (Char Aznabul)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: KICKOFF CLASSIC- NCSU's GREAT CHANCE
Date: 18 Aug 92 03:46:32 GMT
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.college
Distribution: na
Organization: Murasami Labs

DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE wrote:

>  Orange Bowl, or the Rose Bowl like during January. It is the ONLY game in 
>  August. I myself will be at the game personally to witness a truly pivotal

<COUGH><COUGH> Ahem, I'd like to present for your inspection the Pigskin
Classic, 26 August 1992, approximately 9pm EDT on Raycom, featuring the
Stanfraud Cardinal and the Texas A&M Aggies. Granted, much lesser well
known teams than NCSU and Iowa.

>  the game coming up. If NCSU beats Iowa by more than a touchdown, we have a
>  chance to knock off Florida State. No question. If we lose, it will be a good

If you play FSU at home, maybe.

James
From: "al sorhaindo" <al.sorhaindo@execnet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: uw avoided miami
Date: 21 Aug 92 14:18:30 EST
Reply-To: "al sorhaindo" <al.sorhaindo@execnet.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Executive Networks Information

>Washington's athletic department feels the same way, that is why they
>avoided Miami in the Kickoff classic.


BK>Avoiding Miami -->  Now, this has been discussed on rsfc extensively and the
BK>issue was dropped about 1.5 month ago, because "Washington avoided Miami"
BK>is not a true statement.


From a column by Bernie Beglane in the 7/23-8/12 issue of College and Pro
football newsweekly. Quoting Bob Mulcahy, the President and CEO of the
New Jersey Sports and Exposition authority on why the dream kickoff classic
matchup of Washington vs Miami did not occur. "I thought we had a great
matchup, Washington agreed initially and Miami's players voted to come
only if they were going to play Washington. Somehow there was a change in
the thinking of Washington, so Miami withdrew."

No doubt all of the Washington players would like to take the field against
Miami. It would have been nice if the Washington Athletic department
would have allowed them the chance.

                       Al
---
  DeLuxe 1.21 #11688  al.sorhaindo@execnet.com
--
Executive Network Information System  (914) 667-4567
International ILink Host
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tannerg@milton.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner)
Subject: Re: Respect for NC State
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 19:50:03 GMT

>>in the last 2 minutes for a come from behind victory against Marshall.
>
>>week he leads us in another come from behind victory against Duke, scoring
>>
>
>>>Yeah, but Rob the real question is: why is State "coming from behind" against
>>>Duke and (who?) Marshall?
>
>>>Jeff Butera <> Math Grad Student, N.C. State <> jvbutera@math.ncsu.edu
>
>
>Apparently you do not keep up with Division 2 of the NCAA. Marshall was
>in last year's football final four for the Div. 2 and I think that they
>ended up losing in the finals as well. They are obviously no patsy, much
>like Dick Sheridan's teams at Furman in the early 80's. I would put the
>Top 5 in Div. 2 aginst a lot of teams in the Top 25 any day of the week.

You have got to be joking.
Name one IAA member who has beaten a top 25 team in the past ten years.
How about even a close game against a IA Top 25 team (outside of the ACC)?
How about a list of IAA members who have beaten IA teams with winning records?
Yeah, I'll put a Top 5 IAA team against a Top 25 IA team any day of the week,
too, but they're going to lose.

GT

>Rob Black                   black@concert.net             Raleigh, NC

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Todd Henderson)
Subject: Re: What in the heck is a 'T-SIP' ??
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 12:43:12 GMT

marc@yogi.austin.ibm.com (Marc J. Stephenson) writes:

>In article <BsrsJt.FxM@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Todd Henderson) writes:
>>marc@yogi.austin.ibm.com (Marc J. Stephenson) writes:
>>
>>>Certainly at the time that the term "T-sip" was coined, Texas A&M was an 
>>>all-male, all-military, truly agricultural and mechanical college (TAMC
>>>rather than TAMU).  Probably not a whole lot of so-called high culture there.
>>
>>I think the insult could be derived from the fact that, although tu acted
>>like they had a lot of so-called high culture, they were still no different
>>than TAMU or TAMC at the time, i.e. they were putting on aires(sp?)
>>                  ^^^^^^^^^^^  and as any jealous t-sip knows, they've only
>>fallen further behind! :):)  (new nice and improved smiley under construction)
>>
>>Todd
>>tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu

>Ah, but they were and are very different.  

>As might be deduced from my even pointing out that A&M was all-male, 
>all-military, and A&M specialized, UT was co-ed, non-military, and much more
>liberal arts and natural sciences oriented.  One was more likely to find
>a much stronger arts influence at UT than at A&M, which is still the case
>today, though the gap certainly isn't as wide as it was at the time.  This
>was a very noticeable difference between the schools and still is.

>If not allowing women in the university is your idea of high-culture, fine.

The main point, is and always will be that t-sips act above their cultural
calling! :):)

Todd
tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu


>The culture/atmosphere/tradition at A&M is not for everyone.  It has nothing
>to do with jealousy.  If you believe that it does, then you're brainwashed.
>A&M isn't exactly a haven for individual expression - just try to sit down 
>during the next football game, or to not bend over during a yell.  (There,
>I related something from this topic to football.  Amazing!)
>-- 
>Marc Stephenson		    IBM AWD (Advanced Workstations Division - Austin,TX)
>DISCLAIMER: The content of this posting is independent of official IBM position.
>INTERNET->marc@malone.austin.ibm.com     VNET: MARC at AUSVMQ  IBM T/L: 678-3189
From: poore@ds9.scri.fsu.edu (David Poore)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Football news?
Keywords: Who looks good, why, what to expect?
Date: 12 Aug 92 19:24:38 GMT
Reply-To: poore@ds9.scri.fsu.edu (David Poore)
Organization: Florida State University

In article <1992Aug10.161836.20987@cs.ucf.edu> tech@cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini) writes:
>In article <1992Aug7.161845.14368@usho93.hou281.chevron.com> hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde) writes:
>>The Bayou Bengals will tear through the SEC-West like a .22 through an
>>armadillo.  Stunned SEC-West net.fans will try to convince everyone that
>You've obviously never taken a shot at an armadillo with a .22.
>They're tough little bastards. Try again.

Heh...

I guess that was his point...

David Poore
poore@ds9.scri.fsu.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college