From: rogue@ccs.northeastern.edu (Free Radical)
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.alien.visitors,talk.religion.newage
Subject: Re: Saga of the Family of Light I - Pleiadians13
Date: 18 Aug 92 22:48:03 GMT
Organization: Comp. Sci. @ NU

In article <64216@cup.portal.com> Don_-_Showen@cup.portal.com writes:
>RA says
>
>>You're not getting off that easy :-).  The question I have is 'why do _you_
>>believe some people (you?) have 3-strand DNA?'.  

[a lot of semantically-null jargon deleted]

>>Is it because an alien spoke
>>through a channeler & told you so?  

[about 20 lines which seem to say 'yes', along with a ridiculous suggestion 
for public school curriculum change deleted]

and now the cop-out we were all waiting for...

>                                      I would like to suggest that even if
>the 12 heli are not distinguishable under a microscope that there may be an
>explanation for it that hasn t been discovered or noticed.  Like some of
>our dna may not be physical it could be in another energy sprectum we have
>not detected.
>
>>Or is it because a geneticist or other 
>>qualified person examined the DNA & found it has 3 strands?
>
>It sounds to me like you are saying that unless one of your high priests
>okays it you are not allowed to think of it. 

'high priests'?  When your aliens give you the blueprints for a nuke reactor,
airplane, or anything more complex than the wheel, come back and try that 
remark again.

>                                                     After all if I could
>send my clients somewhere and they could get a readout of the status of
>their 12 heli it would make my work easier.  I could even charge by the
>heli that we are working on clearing and opening.  

You could also get a Nobel Prize for Chemistry, and maybe 3 or 4 other 
subjects.

>                                                   Actually it is so real,
>to me,  that the dna is waking up that I consider the only ones who don t
>know it are those hell bent on dying.
>

That's me, hell-bent for DNA :-).

>>OK - since you persist in saying that some people actually have 3-strand
>>DNA (I don't care if it's everyone, 2 percent, or just one guy) - prove it.
>
>I am proving it by doing it and living it.  The changes people are going
>through by one hour of conscious breathing in my hot tub are so personal
>and intense that I doubt if any would submit them for public examination.
>But I am willing to do this.  I will give anyone reading this a one hour
>FREE session in my hot tub ,  under a double pyramid, in San Jose, Ca. At
>our mutually agreed upon time.  For those who feel threatened because I am
>a male,  I have a female who will take you through the process.
>
>Don Showen

I _gotta_ get out to San Jose!!  Is she cute?  Seriously, though - it seems
your intention in this posting is to dodge my challenge, and obfuscate things
as much as possible.  I made a simple request - provide objective evidence
that people exist who have 3-strand DNA.  Please reread the one section
of your post that even attempts to answer my challenge (both challenge 
and response reprinted below).

>>OK - since you persist in saying that some people actually have 3-strand
>>DNA (I don't care if it's everyone, 2 percent, or just one guy) - prove it.

>                                      I would like to suggest that even if
>the 12 heli are not distinguishable under a microscope that there may be an
>explanation for it that hasn t been discovered or noticed.  Like some of
>our dna may not be physical it could be in another energy sprectum we have
>not detected.

It seems you have a much different definition of DNA from the vast majority
of biologists and chemists.  Perhaps we need to come to an agreement on
what DNA is.  Please include a brief discussion on how DNA being 'non-physical'
is _not_ a contradiction in terms.

This post is way too long.  I hate long posts.  But you put out so much
nonsense here I had to respond to all of it.

	RA
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal