HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Jacob A. Vanier <vanier@cs.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: OGGLEs Are FUCKING LAME!
X-Backmasking: !sehsotnicaM sevol adzovH cirE
Keywords: Rick plays with blocks
X-Political-Statement: Barry G. Morgan for President in 2032!
X-Whoosh: WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH
Organization: Whooshers of America (WoA!)
X-Oggle:  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  
X-Subliminal-Message: Dahmus secretly loves Unix!
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 01:07:29 GMT

In article <9204120857.40@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>
>And you're ken's halfwit brother?
>
>Why don't you go help him with his toilet worship?
>

No, I am not K e n's brother, nor do I have any famillal relationship with
K e n. 

I do not worship toilets, therefore how could I be of any help to a person
who does worship toilets?  Also, since when has Ken ever asked for help with
worshiping toilets?  Never as far as I know.

That aside, why should you care wether K e n needs help worshiping toilets?
Is it some special fascination or even fetish that you have with toilets?  Or
do you think that since you do it, then everyone else also worships toilets?

You can spare us the gory details of your religious beleifs, but do not assume
that others practice their faith the same way you do.

Jacob A. Vanier
vanier@cs.psu.edu
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7037 alt.politics.homosexuality:2308
From: djk@homophobes.Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: SHIT WORSHIPPING HOMO SPREADING AIDS TO HUNDREDS OF CHILDREN
Date: 16 Apr 92 18:08:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: homophob.5ZDDJB7w164w
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

jem6892@rigel.tamu.edu (The Whipping Boy) writes:

> In article <ZkDaJB2w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM>, djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes...
> 
> >>99.9999% of all gays
> >> have a strong aversion to [shit].
> 
> >REALLY?!?!?!?!? - They have special functions that keep that stuff
> >out of the way during poop-chute-sex? 
> 
> The reproductive and excretory systems of humans are attached,
> as I'm sure you've figured out.  Under normal conditions, the
> excretory is the dominant system, allowing the body to perform
> necessary waste disposal.  During sexual activity, however, the
> excretory system goes to the back burner so that the reproductive
> (i.e. sexual) organs can do their thing uninterrupted.
> 

Nice try... Problem is the ANUS is not a sexual organ.. It is a 
waste disposal portal and nothing more.

The sexual organs manufacture their own lubricants - the pooter
requires VASELINE.. Or a tounge on some peoples books..

And afterwards requires TUCKS.

Rectal 'sex' is un-natural and filthy.

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@homophobes.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!homophobes!Djk ------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
From: steinar@faust.solan.unit.no (Cindy Kandolf)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: OGGLEs Are FUCKING LAME!
Date: 15 Apr 92 13:14:04 GMT
	<STEINAR.92Apr14152259@faust.solan.unit.no>
	<1992Apr14.165515.4883@uni.edu>
Organization: Flodnak, Inc., Trondheim, Norway

>Hi Cindy, remember me?
Unfortunately, yeah.

>Melvin M. Gladstone

-Cindy Kandolf
 cindy@solan.unit.no
 Trondheim, Norway
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6702 talk.abortion:15009
From: keegan@rosebud.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig Was: Way too long
Date: 14 Apr 92 00:50:25 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
-> In <1992Apr11.170030.8666@rotag.mi.org>
-> >Your attribution line says "kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
-> >writes:", does it not? I did not write the article as you
-> >presented it, nor is there any clue, hint or indication that
-> >the article had been altered or doctored in any way.
-> 
->     Kevin, you should stay out of discussions in news.admin
-> until you at least have enough of a clue to know that rn and
-> several other common newsreaders in use automatically append
-> the attribution line to the follow up articles they generate.

lack of knowledge has never presented kevin from portraying
himself as knowledgeable. at one point, he pretended to know
something about child support. when that fell through, he tried
law. and when that didn't work out for him, he tried system
administration. you've seen the results of that! in the recent
past, when asked to provide an article number to support
something he had posted, kevin replied with his local system
number!  perhaps he'll try surgery next.

        "Kevin, you try so hard to sound competent and
        intelligent, too bad it's an utterly wasted effort.  It
        is so much fun sometimes to beat the shit out of those
        who are intellectually unarmed.  This is why so many
        people find it such fun to beat up on you."
			Babs Woods
			<1991Apr10.223744.17188@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM>


--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Pseudonyms & cowardice
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 05:59:03 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

ladage@pnet07.cts.com (Kenneth David Ladage) writes:

> I do believe we have found ourselves on the same side of the line,
> so-to-speak.  This man _IS_ in fact a twit.

Twit this, dufis:

             ++---++               ------- --   -- ------ ---  /-
             ||   ||               | ____| ||   || | |--| | | / /
             |+---+|               | |     ||   || | |    | |/ /
             |     |               |  ---  ||   || | |    |   \
             |     |               |  __|  ||   || | |    | |\ \
             |     |               | |     ||___|| | ---- | | \ \
             |     |               |_|     |_____| |____| |_|  \_|
             |     |
             | --- |
       +-----|     |----+          ------- ------- -------  | |
       |     |     |    |--+       |  -  | | ____| |  ___|  | |
  +----|     |     |    |  ++      | | | | | |     | |      | |
  |    |     |     |    |   |      | | | | | ---   | ---    | |
  |    |     |     |    |   |      | | | | | __|   | __|    | |
  |                     |   |      | |_| | | |     | |
  |                     |   |      |_____| |_|     |_|      * *
  |                        ++
  |                       ++
  +                    +-+
   +|                  ++

Haahaahaa!!


===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: HOMOSEXUALITY IS ECONOMICALLY ADVANTAGEOUS
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 19:14:16 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Big Bri) writes:

> Here's one for the phobes to chew on:
> 
> Homosexuality is economically advantageous for everyone. Because:
> 
> When someone engages in permiscuous heterosexual relations, there is a 
> very good chance that the (often unwed) female will get pregnant. If she
> has the baby, she will likely take up money from social programs like 
> welfare, food stamps, medicaid, etc. If there homosexuality didn't exist
> (or bisexuality) then everyone would be hetero and there would be more 
> money needed to fund these social programs. More of YOUR TAXDOLLARS
> (great buzzword to get people's attention) would be needed. When someone
> engages in homosexual relations, there is no chance that either party
> will get pregnant and take up your taxdollars, in that respect.
> 
> If heterosexuality is inherently "bad" and homosexuality is inherently "good"
> how do the phobes justify the existence of bisexuality.
> 

THANK G-D for dickheads like this.. 

Makes my side look SOOOOOOOO damn good.


-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Yet Another Clueless Newbie (was Re: Miss Bis)
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:27:49 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <1992Mar31.152108.23449@seq.uncwil.edu>, jtaylor@seq.uncwil.edu (J.
T.) writes:
> 
> I thought maybe you had just "made up" this name Bis....I mean
> its not the type of name you hear often, and it does sound
> kind of female....anyway, if Bis is your real name...then I
> wont pick on you anymore...A name like that is punishment 
> enough....So, if it is your real name...sorry.
> BTW is your last name by any chance...Quick?

Hee hee hee hee!

Haw haw haw haw!

Ho ho ho ho!

What a funny, _funny_ person you are!

Now, go the _fuck_ away!  And take your Commodore 64 with you!

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: OGGLEs Are FUCKING LAME!
Date: 16 Apr 92 21:50:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: uni.1992Apr16.165000.4706
Organization: University of Northern Indiana

steinar@faust.solan.unit.no (Cindy Kandolf) writes:
>>Hi Cindy, remember me?

>Unfortunately, yeah.

So, would you be my friend?

>>Melvin M. Gladstone
>
>-Cindy Kandolf

Melvin M. Gladstone
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bis@world.std.com (Bis)
Subject: Re: This newsgroup has gone to hell!
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 08:36:51 GMT

In article <zx+vHgmmk6@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@through.gis.psu.edu
(Bruce Buffoon) writes:
>In article <22434@goofy.Apple.COM>, lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>|> In article <$6&vHfwkb6@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Steely
>|> Dildo) writes:
>|> > 
>|> > This is a miserable attempt to flame.
>|> 
>|> Well, at least you're consistent.
>
>Yes, I am consistent in that no one other than K e n  and I can flame.  You
>certainly can't.

No, Dildo Dan, you're consistent in that all your "flames" follow a
template.  I'm sure the people at the ai labs at MIT wouldn't need
more than an hour or two to write an automaton that nobody would be
able to distinguish from you.  I'm also sure that any elementary
school teacher would have no trouble finding a student who uses more
mature (and more coherent) invective than you.  Much as you try to
deny it, ignore it, and giggle your way out of it, you are not seen as
a flamer by anybody here, you have never written anything funny,
clever, or insulting in the least, and you are generally regarded as
rotting road kill--something mildly unpleasant but not offensive that
one might slow down to investigate, but then cruise by without giving
it a second thought.  You are nothing but another net.child of the
sort alt.flame is very accustomed to, albeit a little more persistent,
more inoccuous, and more juvenile than the average.  You have been
rock bottom since day one, not even on par with Ken Robinson, and you
will continue to be rock bottom until you finally realize that people
are not having flame wars with you but rather laughing at you like at
a drunk bum dancing in the train station, and feel so stupid you don't
dare show your face any more.

Xref: sparky alt.flame:6677 alt.politics.homosexuality:2062 alt.sex:14331
From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 13 Apr 92 16:44:43 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <jgeb6oc@fido.asd.sgi.com> dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:

>In article <Z3D6iB1w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

>>Fine.. You get queers to write letters and get that silly word
>>added..... I've got a few myself. ;)

>Clever... First the argument is "homophobia is not a word".  When this
>point is lost, he decides that it is because we started a letter writing
>campaign.  Come on Daniel, you can do better than this...

No, he can't.
From: karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Where Karsten Likes To Do It
Date: 16 Apr 92 19:42:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr16.134247.991


 
> and just how often does your having sex occur sonny?

We'll leave that up to your feeble imagination.

Karsten Hendrick
karsten@nic.gac.edu
karsten@lavatch.gac.edu
From: 6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: k a r s t e n  corrects Keegan's crap
Date: 13 Apr 92 01:14:24 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.104253.788@gacvx2.gac.edu> karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) writes:

>Karsten doesn't care if you're,

> A) homosexual
> B) heterosexual
> C) asexual
> D) None of the above
> E) All of the above

>because he will flame you if he disagrees with you or finds
>you disagreeable.
 
Uh oh.  Saltlick has started to refer to himself in the third person.
Next he'll be telling us he conquered Gaul, and divided into three
parts.  Or perhaps he'll invade Russia.  We can only hope.

>> based on what, dearie, just a few unsatisfying experiences?

>No, the thought of it disgusts me.  I don't preach to the
>homosexual community that they have to accept my heterosexuality,
>and I could really give a fuck whether or not they are disgusted,
>awed, or indifferent to heterosexuality.  I don't need to have my 
>sexual orientation justified by public opinion and support for it.  
>So why are you and others trying to squeeze some sort of approval
>for homosexuality out of me?  
 
All of us here would be just as happy if you would drop the subject,
Harddeck.

>No, this is what I am admitting, Keegan:  I could care less if
>all the newspapers in the world headlined "Karsten Hendrick
>is Heterosexual."  I am who I am and I am proud of what I am.

No one objects to your sexuality.  Your rating and raving and
comments about what is 'normal' and what is not prove that it is
you who have the problem.

>Karsten Hendrick, Breadstick to the Emperors

cws

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods)
Subject: Re: How to attain alt.flame.god status
Organization: Misanthropes-R-Us
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 23:16:08 GMT

In <29e38f76.crud@crud.mn.org> trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz) writes:
>In article <1992Apr7.100318.669@gacvx2.gac.edu>
>        karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) writes:
>]Ohh, that's right, you probably have phone sex every night already.  

>Well, no, but we do often have phone conversations.  Sometimes we
>talk about you.

Phone bulemia?  Now *that's* kinky!
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6348 alt.politics.homosexuality:1845
From: dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 8 Apr 92 15:44:59 GMT
Article-I.D.: fido.j9rdu58
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

In article <imawiB4w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
>> However, this is not.  Do you define a natural child as a child who has
>> DNA from both people who are currently raising it?  If so, then your 
>> definition is correct.  However, adopted children are just as natural
>> as non-adopted children.  
>
>BIOLOGICAL, hows that?


Still wrong.  The child exists... Therefore, it is biological.



>> You have this strange obsession with DNA.  Why is this?
>
>Just because that I have one of my own, and perfectly natural, and biologically
>mine!  Well, if you and your "hubbie" can do that, I will shut up.


I can have a baby that is biologically mine.  I can contribute DNA to a child.
So can Blair.  We cannot both contribute DNA to the same child.  However,
the only person who seems to think that this is essential is you.


>> Your first statement was a fact.  Your second statement was your own bigotted
>> take on that fact.
>
>Look again...


I did.  It still was bigotted.





FWA
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6220 soc.motss:19269 alt.politics.homosexuality:1725
From: bpharmon@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame,soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I pity my poor diseased brothers. :-(  Poor homosex victims.
Date: 6 Apr 92 01:54:04 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame,soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality
Organization: Miami University Academic Computer Service"

In article <tbaF021a51223ae@TCRS.COM>, Artimus@TCRS.COM writes:


	garbage galore.


	This fool is obviously looking for trouble, so remember what to do:

	(as someone else said)

	sit on your hands..
	sit on your hands..
	sit on your hands..

	and he'll go away.

	it is clear that this person DOES NOT INTEND TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY..
THEREFORE:

	sit on your hands..
	sit on your hands..
	sit on your hands..


=======================================================================
Brian Harmon       "We are most unfair to God: we do not allow
Miami University	him to sin.."  -- Friedrich Nietzsche
Oxford, Ohio 45056  
(513) 529-5417		"..Knowledge is ruin to my young men"
  				    -- Adolf Hitler 
--------------bpharmon@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu--------------------------
	
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6815 alt.politics.homosexuality:2144
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 14 Apr 92 23:27:46 GMT
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA

In article <R9y7iB3w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
>
>> If one form of pornography is permitted to be uncovered in newsstands,
>> so should others.  Consistency is what I seek.
>
>Same here, but the other direction...

The other direction?  The other direction from what, punk?  The
"other" kind of consistency?  "All animals are equal, but some are
more equal than others?"  What ARE you talking about?

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Someone here suggested blue square badges for
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  straights.  Maybe we should try mauve
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  heptagons?" - Damian Cugley, on soc.bi
From: ckincy@mcs213h.cs.umr.edu (Charles Kincy)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: k a r s t e n  corrects Keegan's crap
Date: 16 Apr 92 20:04:27 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla (f/k/a Missouri School of Mines, Metallurgy, Cooking, Zen, and Wild St. Patrick's Day Parties)

In article <4148@ucsbcsl.ucsb.edu> 6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner) writes:
> [Karsten:]
>>because he will flame you if he disagrees with you or finds
>>you disagreeable.
> 
>Uh oh.  Saltlick has started to refer to himself in the third person.
>Next he'll be telling us he conquered Gaul, and divided into three
>parts.  Or perhaps he'll invade Russia.  We can only hope.

Intresting.  I wish I were there to see this.  It must have been
funny watching Karsten divide into three parts.  Did he have help?
I really want to know this.  I just can't stop laughing.  Now, move
your hands away from my balls, or I will divide them into three parts.

CPK 
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6882 alt.politics.homosexuality:2196
From: jem6892@rigel.tamu.edu (The Whipping Boy)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: SHIT WORSHIPPING HOMO SPREADING AIDS TO HUNDREDS OF CHILDREN
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:50:00 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <ZkDaJB2w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM>, djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes...

>>99.9999% of all gays
>> have a strong aversion to [shit].

>REALLY?!?!?!?!? - They have special functions that keep that stuff
>out of the way during poop-chute-sex? 

The reproductive and excretory systems of humans are attached,
as I'm sure you've figured out.  Under normal conditions, the
excretory is the dominant system, allowing the body to perform
necessary waste disposal.  During sexual activity, however, the
excretory system goes to the back burner so that the reproductive
(i.e. sexual) organs can do their thing uninterrupted.

Think about it.  How many times have you had to urinate while
having sex?  None, I would hope.  Afterwards, though,
when sexual activity has stopped, you usually have to go to
the john, since the excretory organs have sort of backlogged
what it otherwise would have had you expel had those organs
been dominant at the time.

If you ever have a woman urinate while you are in bed with her,
it's a sign that you're *really* bad at what you're doing. :-)

>-djk

James Munger
"And I thought all the homophobes were here at aTm."
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 04:16:01 GMT

In article <j8jjcp0@fido.asd.sgi.com> dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
>In article <5H9TiB1w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>
>>You keep twisting me words around.  What I said, and I will say it again,
>>two male lovers cannot procreate and pass on BOTH of their DNA to the child.
>
>You have this strange obsession with DNA.  Why is this?

DNA envy.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Someone here suggested blue square badges for
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  straights.  Maybe we should try mauve
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  heptagons?" - Damian Cugley, on soc.bi
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig when he is exposed in another lie (was Re: Keegan Stoops to Attempted Fraud)
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 04:43:23 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.202121.9596@crd.ge.com> james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
>kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>-> james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
>-> >kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>-> >-> james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
>-> >-> >you are a fucking liar.
>-> >
>-> >-> What a comforting thought
>-> >
>-> >you find it comforting 
>
>-> Isn't that what I just said?
>
>yes it is. concratulations.
>
>shall we move on to your next lie now?

"Next" lie, Jimmy? How can there be a "next" [sic] lie, when there was no 
lie to begin with???

You're losing it.

								- Kevin
From: fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu (Faisal Nameer Jawdat)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: music
Date: 8 Apr 92 00:43:58 GMT
Organization: Freshman, Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

well it's time for a nice 'intro to programming and computer science' lab

what nice, nice music shall we listen to boys and girls?

simon and garfunkel?
bach?

NIN?
    Did you think i wouldn't recognize this compromise
    Am I just to stupid to realize

Ministry?
    No one listens to reason
    It's too late
    And I'm ready to die

Skinny Puppy?
    It has always been attributable to human error
    (ok so it's a hal ripoff, but you've got to hear it)

Screeching Weasel
    It's gonna be a bright, bright, sun shiny day!!!!!
    (nice cover - a must hear)

any suggestions?
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6215 soc.motss:19252 alt.politics.homosexuality:1722