HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gallo@zeno.fit.edu (Michael A. Gallo)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Subject: Standardized Tests
Date: 15 Oct 92 21:36:37 GMT
Organization: Florida Institute of Technology

I am searching for a standardized survey that measures teacher attitudes 
toward and expectations of educational technology in general, and computer 
networking in particular.  The instrument will be used in a time series over 
a six-month period to detect any changes in these attitudes or expectations.  
The survey will be administered in a standardized format to a group of 
high school teachers.  A trained interviewer will be conducting the interviews. 
Attention to reliability and validity (for the survey instrument) is required.

I checked both Tests in Print and the Mental Measurements Yearbook, but was
not able to locate anything acceptable.  Before I begin generating my own
instrument I thought I would check with some of the folks who subscribe to this
list.  I need the instrument for a project I am involved in, and promise to
give full credit to the designers of any instruments I use.  

Any help or thoughts on this matter would be appreciated.  Feel free to 
contact me directly via e-mail.  I will post a summary of what I receive.  
Thanks.

Mike Gallo
Internet: gallo@zeno.fit.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Sun, 11 Oct 1992 23:53:02 EDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         Al Futrell <AWFUTR01@ULKYVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Thomas ?? on ethnography

>Disciplinary and other distinctions are arbitrary,
>reflecting administrative and other boundaries more than intellectual
>ones.
>
>imposition of arbitary lines of demarcation is, I suggest, a form of
>intellectual violence.

I believe these are the crucial lines in Jim's note, so please, folks,
don't engage him in some type of territorial war (and, alas, prove him
more correct than he should be proven!).  The devotees of a method are the
likely ones to read about it, irrespective of the discipline they belong
to or from which it supposedly comes.  With computer searches, this practice
becomes even more so.  I must admit, however, that I am in a communication
department and attempt to stay somewhat current in the lit of the field
and even with all the talk of "corporate culture" and "organizational
culture" I am hard pressed to identify what I would call a "real"
ethnography.  But I must also confess that my phuddy duddy degree in
in American Culture Studies and not from a "real" discipline.  My mentor
was from the Sapir, Bloomfield era and I was brainwashed into believing that
to do an ethnography the researcher actually had to "be there" and make
some commitment to the group.  I can't believe these articles where someone
goes and visits a classroom 10 or 15 times for an hour or two a day are
ethnographies.  That doesn't mean that the info in them is not sound, good,
etc.  But I think a great deal of confusion exists about so-called qualitative
methods and calling any research protocol that includes interaction
"ethnography" justs adds to the confusion.  It seems that everybody WANTS
to be doing ethnography; the fact that they are all doing it differently
seems little to the point.  Was this the list that took a poll of the
"must" read ethnographies?  Did any of them have anything in common?


---
Al Futrell, awfutr01@ulkyvm.louisville.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X400-Trace: IL*AC*TAU; arrival Tue, 13 Oct 92 17:17:26 +0200 action Relayed
P1-Message-ID: IL*AC*TAU; 5C0A0D1110220038-MTAVE
UA-Content-ID: 5C0A0D1110220038
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Tue, 13 Oct 1992 17:17:26 +0200
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         F78@VE.TAU.AC.IL
Subject:      Reply to Grounded theory & qualitative software
Comments: To: QUALRS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu

Please send your paper, and I'll try to send you comments and corrections on
time.
Giora Rahav
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: QUALRS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"QUALRS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Fri, 9 Oct 1992 09:32:50 -0700
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         JENNINGT@CGSVAX.CLAREMONT.EDU
Subject:      Re: Axial Coding
Comments: To: QUALRS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu

Does anyone out there actually perform axial coding?  If so, can you
roughly describe your procedure?  I think may of us still find in rather
mystifying.  Thanks.

Todd Jennings
JENNINGT@CLARGRAD
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Mon, 12 Oct 1992 19:17:37 PDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         "(Amy Henne)" <henne@EDSTAR.GSE.UCSB.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Disciplinary distinctions
Comments: To: QUALRS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu

An excellent journal debate regarding Qualitative Research
traditions/approaches can be found in the Review of Educational
Research. Spring 87 Vol.57 No. 1 Has Evelyn Jacobs article
entitled "Qualitative Research Traditions:A Review.  Then in
the Summer 88 Vol.58 No.2 issue, Paul Atkinson, Sara Delamont,
and Martyn Hammersley fire off their response entitled,
"Qualitative Research Traditions: A British Response to Jacobs".
Summer 89 Vol 59 No 2 brings Jacons response, "Qualitative
Research:A Defense of Traditions" and Yvonna Lincoln's article,
"Qualitative Research: A Response to Atkinson, Delamont and
Hammersley".
This debate is rich with historical intellectual context for
the continuing discussion over issues of turf and territoriality.
Kind Regards--

-Amy

************************************************************************
Amy D. Henne
Graduate School of Education
University of California at Santa Barbara
Internet: henne@edstar.gse.ucsb.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
From: sjones@alfred.carleton.ca (Stan Jones)
Subject: Re: Axial Coding
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 12:08:30 GMT

In <0752CCCA20400926@ACS.WOOSTER.EDU> KCOYLE@WOOSTER.BITNET writes:

>Strauss's newest text (as far as I know, anyway) is

>Strauss, A. L. (1987).  _Qualitative analysis for social scientists._ Cambridge,
>U.K.:  Cambridge University Press.

>Kelly


Strauss and Corbin (Juliet) _Basics of qualitative research: grounded
theory procedures and techniques_.  Sage, 1990, is more how-to than
QASS and might work better as a class text (I believe that is how it
was intended to eb used anyway).

Stan Jones (sjones@ccs.carleton.ca)      ()
Centre for the Study of Adult Literacy  |\/|
Carleton University                     o  o
Ottawa, Ontario                         |  |
K1S 5B6                                  \/
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: University of Innsbruck, Austria
Priority:     normal
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Sat, 10 Oct 1992 06:28:43 GMT+0100
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         "Michael Schratz, Uni Innsbruck" <Michael.Schratz@UIBK.AC.AT>
Subject:      Re: Participatory Action Research
Comments: To: rmct@DEAKIN.OZ.AU, QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET

Robin, your course outline for the par course on global pedagogy
sounds intriguing! Good job.
I have received the final course prospectus of the peace course at
Schlaining. Have they sent you one too? Otherwise I'll forward one (I
got too). Our names are mentioned in the program. Any news on your
sabbatical?
Take care,
Michael
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Fri, 9 Oct 1992 10:25:22 PDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         Richard Anthony Young <USERRAYY@UBCMTSG.BITNET>

I am considering proposing a symposium for the 23rd International
Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain July 17-22, 1994 on
the topic "Parents, Adolescents and Career Development".  I have
been working on this topic from a qualitative, action theory
perspective.  A symposium in which papers with a similar or related
perspective are presented might be very worthwhile.  Please let me
know if you (or someone you know not on the List) are doing similar
work and might be interested in presenting a paper at the Symposium.
If I can get 4-5 potential participants, particularly if they
represent a number of countries, then I may be able to propose a
symposium to the congress organizers.  Please respond to me directly at:
Internet:  richard_anthony_young@mtsg.ubc.ca
Phone: 604-822-6380
Fax: 604-822-2328
Thanks.
Richard Young
Dept. of Counselling Psychology
University of British Columbia
5780 Toronto Rd.
Vancouver, BC V6T 1L2 Canada
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 21:55:59 EDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         "(GERALD WEINSTEIN)" <geraldw@TITAN.UCC.UMASS.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Life History
Comments: To: QUALRS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu

Sage Press just announced a new book, Investigating Subjectivity: Research on
Lived Experience ed. Carolyn Ellis & Micael G. Flaherty.
Jerry W.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Sat, 10 Oct 1992 20:53:28 EDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         "Anita Roychoudhury,
              Miami University" <aroychoudhur@MIAVX2.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Thomas ?? on ethnography

In addition to Michael's comments:
There is a journal called "Anthropology and Education
Quarterly" that publishes inter-disciplinary articles. Obviously
some researchers in anthropology and education not only aware
of the perspectives of the other field, they are also making use
of the multiple angles to enhance their own learning.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Date-warning: Date header was inserted by OREGON.UOREGON.EDU
X-Envelope-to: QUALRS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Mon, 12 Oct 1992 07:47:04 -0700
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         mhorney@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU
Subject:      Every Good Method...
Comments: To: QUALRS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu

Ah, now there's a good topic for debate. Extending just a little on what
Solomon Yusim has ask about "grounded interpretive method," What
characteristics should every good method have?

Now remember, that's EVERY good method...
Mark Horney
215 Education
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
mhorney@oregon.uoregon.edu
(503) 346-2679
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Mon, 12 Oct 1992 11:26:54 EDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         Martin Packer <USERGFX8@UMICHUM.BITNET>
Subject:      Disciplinary distinctions

I'm intrigued by the distinction made by Jim between "disciplinary"
distinctions and "intellectual" distinctions.  I was starting to think that
Kuhn had taught us that intellectual distinction *were* disciplinary
distinctions.  How am I to tell to two apart, please?
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
From: muhr@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de (Thomas Muhr)
Subject: Re: Reply to Grounded theory & qualitative software
Organization: Techn. University of Berlin, Germany
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 07:58:12 GMT

F78@VE.TAU.AC.IL writes:

>Please send your paper, and I'll try to send you comments and corrections on
>time.
>Giora Rahav
I did not follow the thread, could you give me a reference to the
original message?
Thanks -
Thomas
--
Thomas Muhr - Project ATLAS - Technical University of Berlin
voice: +49 30 314 27882  fax: ...25959  
BITNET: muhrth@db0tui11  INTERNET: muhr@cs.tu-berlin.de
Compu$erve: 100013,377
From: RPSY@ASC.UPENN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Subject: ethnography, etc.
Date: 15 Oct 92 19:54:32 GMT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Comments: To: qualrs-l@uga.cc.uga.edu

Al: Thanks for your clarification. I did not mean to equate paradigms with
disciplines though I can see why you were given that impression. As I
understand it at a level of common sense, paradigms are shared assumptions
about what is known and unknown, or supported and unsupported hypotheses,
concerning an object of inquiry, so they would not appear to have much to
do with disciplines. My point was rather that when we write oriented in only
one discipline, we rely on understandings about what is evidence and what
constitutes adequate explanation, and some of those understandings may conceal
ambiguities. Stan
From: TK0JUT1@NIU.BITNET (Jim Thomas (tk0jut1@niu.bitnet))
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Subject: Re: Subject: Ethnography etc
Date: 15 Oct 92 03:23:00 GMT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

Judging from your last note tonight, I assume I have your dept
affiliation more-or-less correct. Hope so--it's what I sent off, but
if not, let me know asap and I'll make changes.

I stuck in 6 papers because of *strong* possility that gordon meyer
won't be able to make it, which leaves 5.  'Cause of the issue, I
wanted to have at least 4 strong ones (and we have 5). At 15 minutes
each, that should leave plenty of time.  Thought I'd try to tape them,
edit them down, and run them as a special issue in CuD. If there are
complete papers, we can stick them in the archives.

Our little 8 pound cuddly, purring, lovable 2-year old kitten caught
two mice in the last 24 hours. Gross! Yech!  She won't be sleeping
with me for awhile-----fuckin' carnivore!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Mon, 12 Oct 1992 20:57:00 CDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         U21DLS1@NIU.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Thomas ?? on ethnography

Dear Michael - Some of us are in the postion of working in
an interdisciplinary field and contributing regularly to
major conferences in interdisciplinary fields. Others are
not as fortunate.  In my school (visual and performing arts)
it is rare that one has the opportunity to cross disciplinary
boundaries in research or colleageality.  Our students rarely
have the opportunity to hear/see input from any but their own
discipline and their education is narrowly slotted as if they
were forced to wear blinders from class to class.  It is if they
see barbed wire isolating each intellectual discipline.  Lucky
is the scholar/student who has the tools to dismantle or rend
the barbed wire. Sure, we can, with effort hurdle the structures
that separate art from anthropology and science from sociology
and greek from geology.
But it doesn't happen as often as I for one, would wish.
Jim makes a good point.  Unless we can dismantle the artificial
barriers that we, ourselves have created between disciplines,
we will not be able to see (as Steve Martin said) shit from
shinola.
peace, Debbie Smith-Shank, pres. SIG semiotics AERA
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:22:53 EDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         Al Futrell <AWFUTR01@ULKYVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: What's Ethnography/Chicago Ethnography?

Ethnography is what ethnographers do.  (Famous quotation -- Geertz)
Chicago ethnography is what ethnographers do in Chicago.


---
Al Futrell, awfutr01@ulkyvm.louisville.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Fri, 9 Oct 1992 16:57:34 -0400
Reply-To:     aa248@yfn.ysu.edu
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         "(Nicholas Sturm)" <aa248@YFN.YSU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Thomas ?? on ethnography
Comments: To: QUALRS-L@UGA.bitnet

>So the answer to Jim's question is that "yes" I can do an
>ethnography of an e-group.  And I can also clean out my garage.
>

  An I suspect there is an ethnographer that would find studying
  your garage before or after cleaning a rewarding experience,

  ...but there may well be ethnographers that would find neither
  of much interest or value.


--
Nicholas Sturm, 4037 Ward Beecher, 410 Wick Ave., Youngstown, Ohio 44555
  * aa248@yfn.ysu.edu *
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Sat, 10 Oct 1992 17:34:00 CDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         "Jim Thomas (tk0jut1@niu.bitnet)" <TK0JUT1@NIU.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Thomas ?? on ethnography

Al writes:

   >While asking "what is ethnography" and then whether one can do an
   >ethnography of a user group or listserv, Jim avoids the real
   >question of whether e-groups can be treated as cultures.

Al, I think there's another important question lurking here as well.
I suspect that much of the "what counts as" debates over a theory,
perspective, method, or discipline, involves territorial protection of
intellectual turf. Disciplinary and other distinctions are arbitrary,
reflecting administrative and other boundaries more than intellectual
ones.

There is considerable conceptual, topical, and other overlap in many
disciplines, but I'm often struck by how few "sociology" ethngraphers
read anthropology, and, judging from conferences, books/articles,
collegial discussions, and other sources, how far behind those in
education seem to be to current debates in other disciplines. Part of
the problem in, for example, a narrow def of ethnography could be
largely the result of the incestuous nature of academic disciplines.
In our own department, for example, an "anthropologist" whose work was
explicetly sociological, had her dissertation chaired by Erving
Goffman, and had worked in a soci dept for a few years, was criticized
as "unqualified" because she was "an anthropologist and not a
sociologist." The basis for the cricism was not derived from her work,
but from the symbolic identity confered by an anthro degree. The
imposition of arbitary lines of demarcation is, I suggest, a form of
intellectual violence.

Jim (never had a crim course until I became a criminologist and
     taught them) Thomas
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 14:14:46 -0700
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was rotha@SFU.CA
From:         Michael_Roth@SFU.CA
Subject:      Re: LEA
Comments: To: "Qualitative Research for the Human Sciences"
              <QUALRS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>

Susan:

LEA = Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.  Their address is

c/o Journal Subscription Deptartment
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
365 Broadway
Hillsdale, NJ  07642

Tel: 201-666-4110
FAX: 201-666-2394


Hope this helps you

Wolff-Michael Roth, Ph.D.
Research Methods & Science Education
Faculty of Education
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, BC, Canada  V5A 1S6
Tel:       (604) 291-3046
FAX:      (604) 291-3203
internet: Michael_Roth@sfu.ca
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 09:36:05 EDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         SED91LN@BUACCA.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Axial Coding

There is a Corbin and Strauss book out in 1990 which discusses open,
axial, and selective coding in more detail and more clearly than the
1987 book. It's in paper, but I can't remember the title at the moment.
I'd look there before the 1987 version.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  JNET%"qualrs-l@uga"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 10:50:00 EDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         ELLISON@UFPINE.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Life History

Angrosino, Michael  _Documents of  Interaction: Biography, Autobiography,
and Life History in Social Science Perspective_, Gainesville: University
of Florida Press, Monographs in Social Sciences Number 74, 1989.

The book is pretty short and enjoyable. The author, who has other
publications you may be able to find, gives four case studies involving
work he's done over the years. These range from the life history
of a recovering alcoholic, to an analysis of the autobiography of
Albert Gomes, to personal naratives in Aruba. The final study is
Agrosino's more recent work amaong deinstitutionalized retarded
adults in Florida. Within the book he presents a aconceptual background
that includes a good discussion of symbolic interactionism. All this
in 116 pages including index and biblio.

Good Luck.

Jim Ellison
anthropology
University of Florida
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 13:17:00 CDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         "Jim Thomas (tk0jut1@niu.bitnet)" <TK0JUT1@NIU.BITNET>
Subject:      What's Ethnography/Chicago Ethnography?

The following questions derive from some discussions with people
who've had trouble convincing editors or potential dissertation
advisors of the value of their research, so thought I'd raise them
here for some discussion:


1) What is ethnography?

2) What is "Chicago Ethnography?"

3) Is it possible to do a study of BBS or newsgroup logs as
"ethnography?" To be "Chicago Ethnography?"

Comments???
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Tue, 6 Oct 1992 21:52:00 EDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         KCOYLE@WOOSTER.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Axial Coding

Strauss's newish text, _Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists_,
alternates the concepts of GT with extensive empirical examples. I have
found it very useful for methods courses.

Kelly
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Envelope-to: QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 10:02:47 -0400
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         IPW <WILSONT@SSCVAX.CIS.MCMASTER.CA>
Subject:      Re: Axial Coding

 ... i/you/we/he/she/they said ...

"There is a Corbin and Strauss book out in 1990 which discusses open,
"axial, and selective coding in more detail and more clearly than the
"1987 book. It's in paper, but I can't remember the title at the moment.
"I'd look there before the 1987 version.

        it's _basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures
        and techniques_ , SAGE publications 1990.

 ___
<*,->      i.p.w.
[`-']      wilsont@sscvax.cis.mcmaster.ca
-"-"-
                ..... where there's a witch, there's a way
                        ..... witches have brooms 'cz nature abhores a vacuum
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%"QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Mon, 12 Oct 1992 11:50:00 CDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         BOEHLEFELD@WISCSSC.BITNET
Subject:      RE: Disciplinary distinctions

I think disiplinary distinctions are a subset of intellectual distinctions.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.qualrs-l
Date:         Mon, 12 Oct 1992 14:45:26 EDT
              <QUALRS-L@UGA.BITNET>
From:         Richard Quantz <RQUANTZ@MIAMIU.BITNET>

Please disregard the previous message from RHOFMANN asking for a signon.Please
 sign RQUANTZ@MIAMIU onto this qualitative network.  Thank you.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU