HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dv@welch.jhu.edu (Deepak Vaidya)
Subject: Cisco and U S Robotics v.32bis with ASL
Reply-To: dv@welchgate.welch.jhu.edu
Organization: Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:01:34 GMT

Hello,

Is anybody using us robotics with cisco terminal servers.  If you are
can you please provide the configuration for the modem.  I am using
CS-500 16 port ts, and just purchase 2 us robotics modem.

I have the ts working with Anderson Jacobson Modems, but having problems
with the us robotics, because I am having a hard time figuring out the 
right settings.

Thank You in Advance
-Deepak Vaidya
dv@welchgate.welch.jhu.edu
[128.220.59.13]


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: pete lunt <plunt@dns001.ford.com>
Subject: metric weights
Mailer: Elm [revision: 66.25]
Date: 16 Nov 92 13:41:04 EST
X-Note1: mail msgid was <9211161840.AA04851@srlns1.srl.ford.com>
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews


Possible customer of cisco routers asks upon furthur study of IGRP:

Does anybody actually use the K-parameters in their network?  That is,
using the Metric Adjustment:"metric weights" command? If so, can you tell
us what determined the need and what the results of changing it were please?

Pete Lunt
Network Consultant
HP Novi, MI Sales
From: leinwand@mead.cisco.com (Allan Leinwand)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: Need Info on ciscoWorks
Date: 16 Nov 1992 05:52:16 GMT
Organization: cisco Systems, Menlo Park, California, USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: mead.cisco.com

In article <BxJJC0.F03@icon.rose.hp.com> thg@hprnd.rose.hp.com (Terry Gong) writes:
>What is the part number and what is the cost for ciscoWorks?
>Anyone have any information on this new product -- like
>what it does, what system does it run on, etc.?

Hello Terry,

   CiscoWorks 1.0 costs $9,995.  It has a wealth of functionality and
runs on Sun Sparc systems.  Please send us mail at cs@cisco.com for
more information.

Thanks,

Allan Leinwand
cisco Systems
(415) 688-7653
leinwand@cisco.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: Bob Albrightson <albright@lager.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Route single IP address to another subnet?
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:05:06 PST
X-Note1: mail msgid was <CMM.0.90.2.722131506.albright@lager.cisco.com>
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews

I would strongly suggest that you have the nameserver running on two machines
during the transition.  One on 128.238.2.17 and the other one on
128.238.32.23.  When the root nameservers and resolver only configurations on
your local net have the new address, turn off 128.238.2.17.

 -bob
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: "Brad (B.M.) Glidewell" <NVBMG01@nt.com>
Subject: re:Banner displays on 8.3(5) incoming connections 
Content-Identifier: re:Banner dis... 
X400-Mts-Identifier: [/PRMD=NT/ADMD=MCI/C=US/;bcars567.n.167:17.10.92.19.58.53] 
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2) 
Date: 17 Nov 1992 11:57:00 +0000 
X400-Originator: /DD.ID=NVBMG01/G=Brad/I=BM/S=Glidewell/@nt.com 
Original-Encoded-Information-Types: ia5, undefined 
X-Note1: mail msgid was <"26179 Tue Nov 17 14:59:10 1992"@nt.com> 
X400-Received: by /PRMD=NT/ADMD=MCI/C=US/; Relayed; 
               Tue, 17 Nov 1992 05:57:00 -0600 
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews

Use the following example to configure individual lines without banners
and no vacant-message.




line 4
no exec-banner
no vacant-message


Hope this helps!


Brad

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: watt-alan@net.yale.edu (Alan Watt)
Subject: Re: Redistribution of routing information
Originator: swatt@mickey.CS.Yale.Edu
Organization: Yale University, Computing & Information Systems
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:56:48 GMT


In article <1992Nov13.234956.2167@BofA.com>, alan@BofA.COM (Alan Hobesh) writes:
|> RE: Redistribution of routing updates
|> 
|> We have a cisco router in NY that runs RIP and IGRP.  The network
|> 192.9.200.0 (class A) is directly connected.  The router learns
|> about a network 192.9.201.0 from a different router (not Cisco) 
|> that uses RIP to advertise this route.  
|> 
|> Routing tables look like this:
|> 
|> R    192.9.201.0 [120/1] via 192.9.200.220, 0:00:09, Ethernet0
|> C    211.211.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1
|> C    192.9.200.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
|> 
|> A second cisco router in SF is connected via serial 1 to NY.  When
|> we distribute RIP via IGRP, the router in SF only learns
|> about 192.9.200.0.  This router can only see 192.9.201.0
|> when we run RIP in SF.  We would prefer to not run RIP in
|> SF, only IGRP.  Why can't the SF router see the second RIP
|> network when we redistribute the RIP updates via IGRP?
|> 
|> routing table in SF
|> 
|> I    192.9.200.0 [100/8576] via 211.211.1.2, 0:00:00, Serial0
|> C    211.211.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0
|> 
|> Thanks.

You may be using the "redistribute" command incorrectly.  The "redistribute"
command in any router protocol section lists the protocol *FROM* which
to take routing information to be distributed under the current protocol
section.  That is, to redistribute RIP-derived information via IGRP:

	router igrp 999		! or whatever your IGRP AS number is
	network 211.211.0.0
	network 192.9.200.0
	redistribute rip

If instead you have:

	router rip
	network 211.211.0.0
	network 192.9.200
	redistribute igrp 999

You would get the behavior you describe.

The other possibility is your configuration lacks a "default-metric"
statement in the igrp router configuration.  Ours has:

	router igrp 999
	default-metric 200 1000 250 200 586

I can't recall offhand what all those numbers mean, but it's necessary
when redistributing RIP as otherwise there is no way to convert RIP
metrics into IGRP.
-- 
  Alan S. Watt
  Yale University			Computing and Information Systems
  Box 2112 Yale Station			(203) 432-6602
  New Haven, CT  06520-2112		Watt-Alan@Yale.Edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: Greg Fowler <fowler@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: RFC1315 implementation 
             <"15251 Tue Nov 17 16:15:48 1992"@bnr.ca> 
Date: 19 Nov 92 20:54:02 -0800
X-Note1: mail msgid was <9211200454.AA21450@regal.cisco.com>
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews

 Date:    Tue, 17 Nov 92 16:14:00 GMT
 To:      cisco@spot.colorado.edu
 
 From:    "Ivan (C.I.) Suharly" <ivansuh@bnr.ca>
 Subject: RFC1315 implementation 
 
 cisco router supports SNMP ifType frame_relay(32) for frame relay
 interfaces. This allows SNMP network surveillance and monitoring of
 frame relay interface status as well as basic performance parameters
 with SNMP MIB-II.
 
 I walked through the MIB in cisco 8.3(3) and 9.0(2), it seemed that
 frame-relay specific MIB, RFC1315, has not been implemented yet.
 
 RFC1315 is useful for proactive network performance and fault
 management on public frame relay network in the area of individual
 PVC status and frame relay congestion control (FECN and BECN).
 The tool available today to look at these parameters is a W&G DA-30
 with FR application program.
 
 When will cisco implement RFC1315 ?
We will be implementing RFC1315 in the next major software release.  The time
of the release hasn't been determined yet.

	Greg
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.sys.cisco:1635 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:5184
From: gutherz@europa.rutgers.edu (Matt Gutherz)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: routing trouble - one ethernet/two subnets
Keywords: repost
Date: 17 Nov 92 07:22:49 GMT
Followup-To: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.



Hi. 

I have an ethernet segment configured to support two different
subnets.  Unfortunately the routers serving this segment only
generate one routing update sourced from one of its two configured
IP addresses on that segment.  For the SUN workstations in the
subnet that the routers sources the update from this is not a
problem.  Routed functions properly.  The SUN workstations
in the other subnet are not as fortunate.  Routed on these machines
is currently not excepting updates from a router it considers
non-local.  

Does anyone have any ideas how I might be able to make this
work (without using gated or fudging subnet masks on the 
workstations)?  The SUNs are 4.1.

Thanks.

Matt Gutherz
matt@japan.sbi.com	"Savoir Faire is everywhere."
-- 
blah!
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: William "Chops" Westfield <billw@regal.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: cslip or ppp on ASM?
Date: 19 Nov 92 12:57:31 PST
X-Note1: mail msgid was <CMM.0.90.2.722206651.billw@regal.cisco.com>
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews

CSLIP is present in the 9.1 software release, which started shipping
a couple of weeks ago.

BillW
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: Pasvorn Boonmark <boonmark@cisco.com>
Subject: Modem & SL/IP
Date: 15 Nov 92 17:47:29 -0800
X-Note1: mail msgid was <9211160147.AA12546@last-call.cisco.com>
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews

The only problem with the AUX port running SLIP mode is that you will
have to do "CLEAR LINE" afterward.
   From: Superuser <root@dsc.blm.gov>
   X-Mailer: SCO System V Mail (version 3.2)
   Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 10:59:24 MST

   I'm trying to get the aux. port on my IGS-R configured for slip interactive.
   Got the modem to answer, and I can login to the router or invoke slip with
   no problem.
   A "sh li" doesn'
   t [A[C[C[C[C[C[C[C[C[C[C[C[C[C[Ct reflect that the aux port has a modem connected and I
   can't locate anything in the Cisco books on how to set the port for modem
   service.  The result is that when I hangup, the port doesn't clear and
   revert to interactive - it stays in slip.          
   Also a problem is data overruns.  The modem is an MNP-10 device with the
   port at 38.4  Accessing from a 9600 MNP-5 device results in data loss.
   How does one configure the aux. port for hardware (CTS/RTS) flow control?
   Thanks, all!!!

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: Allan Leinwand <leinwand@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: MORE ON COUNTERS !!
Date: 22 Nov 92 1:20:17 PST
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
X-Note1: mail msgid was <9211220920.AA26570@mead.cisco.com>
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews

Hello Bob,

>This then brings up the question, what is the maximum value a counter
>can reach?  Are all counters the same?  Am I going crazy?  I have just
>re-read the 8.2, 8.3, and 9.0 documentation, for the third time,
>and I cant find any reference to the max. value.

A Counter is a data type defined in RFC1155, The Structure and
Identification of Management Information (SMI), which defines all the
data types used in SNMP.  All the objects which are of type Counter in
the cisco MIB conform to this definition.  Here is the excerpt from
RFC1155:

    3.2.3.3.  Counter

      This application-wide type represents a non-negative integer which
      monotonically increases until it reaches a maximum value, when it
      wraps around and starts increasing again from zero.  This memo
      specifies a maximum value of 2^32-1 (4294967295 decimal) for
      counters.

If you need any help from us at Cisco, please feel free to drop us a
note at cs@cisco.com.

-- 
Thanks,

Allan Leinwand
cisco Systems
(415) 688-7653
leinwand@cisco.com
From: trstan%trew@dot.ca.gov ( )
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: slip connectivity
Date: 23 Nov 92 21:13:00 GMT
Return-Path: <trstan@trew ( )>
X-Note1: mail msgid was <9211232118.AA00489@dot.ca.gov>
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews


Several msgs have been seen here suggesting that the AUX port
could be used for dial-in SLIP connectivity, although the 
manual I have makes no mention.

Is anyone actually using an AUX port for SLIP? If so, what
does your config look like? I am running 8.3(5)BFX.

tks
From: rnb@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu (Robert N. Berlinger)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: SNM 2.0 schema for Cisco MIB?
Date: 23 Nov 92 17:06:52 GMT
Organization: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY

Anyone know where I might find up to date SunNet Manager 2.0 schema/oid
files for the Cisco MIB?
--
Robert Berlinger
Manager of Networking and Systems
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: William "Chops" Westfield <billw@regal.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: slip connectivity
Date: 23 Nov 92 14:13:07 PST
X-Note1: mail msgid was <CMM.0.90.2.722556787.billw@regal.cisco.com>
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews

The AUX port can run slip starting in SW release 9.0.  This is intended
for network managment, downloading new images to flash, and stuff like
that.  You cannot use the aux port as an async network interface and
route over it.  (This is on the wishlist for a future release.  It is
NOT in 9.0, and is NOT in 9.1)
 
In 9.1, the Comm Servers support routing over their async lines, but
still not the aux port...

Bill Westfield

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: "Robert (R.W.) Eros" <eros@bnr.ca>
Subject: Maximum number of FDDI cards in an AGS+ 
Content-Identifier: Maximum numbe... 
X400-Mts-Identifier: [/PRMD=BNR/ADMD=TELECOM.CANADA/C=CA/;bcars520.b.866:15.10.92.19.25.45] 
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2) 
Date: 15 Nov 1992 14:27:00 +0000 
X400-Originator: /DD.ID=1447618/G=Robert/I=RW/S=Eros/@bnr.ca 
Original-Encoded-Information-Types: ia5, undefined 
X-Note1: mail msgid was <"3880 Sun Nov 15 14:25:51 1992"@bnr.ca> 
X400-Received: by /PRMD=BNR/ADMD=TELECOM.CANADA/C=CA/; Relayed; 
               Sun, 15 Nov 1992 09:27:00 -0500 
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews

Greetings,
We have a number of AGS+ routers equipped with FDDI cards in our shop,
and an ongoing discussion with Cisco about the number of cards we can
put in one box using cBus CTL I. Anybody experiencing any performance limitationproblems using 3 or 4 cards in one AGS+? Any information re total number of
cards, average utilisation per FDDI interface, performance issues would be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Robert Eros, WAN analyst, Information Technology, BNR Ottawa.


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: Roland Acra <acra@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Route single IP address to another subnet?
Date: 18 Nov 92 18:40:27 PST
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
X-Note1: mail msgid was <9211190240.AA29537@ash.cisco.com>
X-Note2: message-id generated by recnews

> Our primary domain nameserver is being moved to a new building, and to
> a different subnet.  I would like to use our Cisco AGS+ routers to
> ease the transition by forwarding packets destined for the old IP
> address to the new one.  I don't know if this is possible.
> 
> Here's our basic topology:
> 
> -------128.238.2.0-----[AGS1]------128.238.30.0------[AGS2]----128.238.32.0
>         Ethernet         |             FDDI            |   \    Ethernet
>                          |                             |    \
>                        Other                         Other   +---INTERNET
>                       Subnets                       Subnets
> 
> The machine in question is being moved from 128.238.2.17 to 128.238.32.23.
> Internet nameserver queries go to 128.238.2.17.
> 
> I would like AGS2 to take all packets destined for 128.238.2.17 and
> route them to 128.238.32.23 instead.  Or, if there is some way I can keep
> the IP address at 128.238.2.17 on the new subnet, that would work, too
> (but that seems to contradict what I know about TCP/IP networking).
> 
> Can I somehow have the AGS+ do this?  This is, of course, a temporary 
> solution, until the NIC is able to update their database to reflect the
> new IP address.  We are running v8.3(2).
> 
> Any help would be greatly appreciated ... please respond via E-mail.

Unfortunately, the router can only redirect UDP broadcast packets
to specific IP addresses or network numbers, but packets destined
to an individual address such as 128.238.2.17 cannot be remapped
to a different destination address.

I can see one solution if you are willing to change the subnet
number of your left-hand side Ethernet (presumably not very
desirable unless it is very sparsely populated):

If you could change the subnet number on your left hand side Ethernet
to something other than 128.238.2.0, then you could cumulate two subnets
on your right hand side Ethernet, namely subnets 128.238.2.0 and 128.238.32.0 .
Your host could then stay on the right hand side Ethernet and keep its address
of 128.238.2.17 .

Roland Acra
Cisco Systems, Europe
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: mikeh@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (michael p.herlihy)
Subject: SRB Native Mode over Frame Relay?
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:43:39 GMT


Is it possible in 9.0 to use Source-Route Bridging Native Mode
encapsulation?  According to my beta release cisco manuals the
serial line on the point-to-point circuit must run HDLC.

However, I have a customer that is running Source-Route Bridging
Native Mode with frame-relay encapsulation....

-- 
So in your discussions of the nuclear freeze proposals, I urge you to
beware the temptation of pride--the temptation blithely to declare
yourselves above it all and label both sides equally at fault, to ignore
the facts of history and the aggressive impulses of an evil empire....
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans,comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: Rick <bates_r*Corp_C@msm.cdx.mpt.com>
Subject: Re: Need advice on wide area networking
Organization:  Motorola Codex
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 14:55:16 GMT
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1

I would suggest that some research into possible other needs, such as
voice lines between buildings, might yield advantages for your data
transfers. If you install the T1 line and install a DSU that can
accomodate both the voice circuits and the serial interface on your
router, you can share the cost and the bandwidth giving you 12 channels
for voice and 768Kbps for your router link.
______________________________________________________________________

Rick Bates 508-261-4999
Motorola Codex
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: baloo@nx01.mik.uky.edu (kevin s coupal)
Subject: Trying to use tell on bitnet! Help!
Keywords: bitnet
Summary: Need help with tell on bitnet
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
X-Path: nx01.mik.uky.edu!baloo
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:48:58 GMT

I'm trying to send a tell message to an account at Murray State University
in Kentucky.  I know it works becuase I have done it in the past.  I just
forget now.  The users account is b23812s and I believe the bitnet 
address is msukyvm.  So i tried using tell b23812s@msukyvm <message> and
only got a message saying, user not logged in.  I don't think that is
right cuz i'm quite sure she was logged in.  When I write her mail however
I use b23812s@msumusic.bitnet.  And that works fine.  If anyone is out there
that is real smart with tells and bitnet I would really appreciate a reply
to my NeXT account baloo@mik.uky.edu.  Thanks in advance!
Kevin Coupal

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: donp@novell.com (don provan)
Subject: Re: packet drops on repeaters?
Organization: Novell, Inc., San Jose, California
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:18:57 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.095734.6630@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> mart@csri.toronto.edu (Mart Molle) writes:
>If you had said >100< workstations instead of >1000< workstations above, I
>would have happily agreed with you.  However, the Ethernet backoff algorithm
>does NOT do what you expect when there are a lot of stations involved in
>a transient overload.

You have a very interesting point.  I'm no Ethernet expert, so i can't
say for sure whether the backoff algorithm will actually come into play.
(With a very high, sustained load, it would seem like collisions should
be fairly rare since the wire will almost always be detectably busy, but
perhaps my ignorance of CSMA/CD is showing.)  But assuming you're
correct, the other side of this is that in practice those 1000
workstations won't be talking willy-nilly: they'll all be trying to talk
to a handful of central nodes: file servers for example.  This is
particularly true in the actual scenerio under discussion (a massive
simultaneous boot), but it tends to be approximately true in general.

Although intuition often fails when applied to networks, my intuition is
that after an initial flurry of instability, all 1000 workstations will
tend to settle down into a stable state where their transmissions are
gated by the more sedate transmissions of that handful of central nodes.
Thus, although 1000 workstations are competing to use the network, in
general only something like 2*N nodes, where N is the number of central
nodes involved, will be actively competing for an actual transmission
slot.  On a typical network, 2*N will be well within the tolerance of
the 802.3 backoff algorithm.

I'd love to run some tests on this, but, alas, time forbids.  At any
rate, we all agree the network would be useless; it's just a question of
how long it will take to recover once everyone gives up and goes home...

						don provan
						donp@novell.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: scott@gordian.com (scott murphy)
Subject: Re: 10base5 to 10baseT converter
Keywords: 10baseT, 10base5, question, twisted pair
Organization: Gordian; Costa Mesa, CA
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:46:31 GMT

In article <!98wH1zd?a@atlantis.psu.edu>, donadio@orville.psu.edu (Beaker) writes:
> I have a question.  I have a Western Digital EtherCard PLUS For 
> Twisted Pair Wiring (WDLAN-ETP (F001)).  I would like to connect
> this card to a 10baseT centralized computer network (the plug in
> my wall is for 10baseT).  I bought the card for $60 from someone
> on misc.forsale.computers, and don't really want to buy a new card.
> Can I buy a simple converter to accomplish this, and where can I
> get one from?  Thanks.
> 
> P.S.  This card is somewhat old.  It's a full length 8-bit card
> with a twisted pair adapter, but it isn't 10baseT.  It also has
> a 15-pin thick-net connector.
> 

You can buy a MAU (media attachment unit that goes from the AUI (15-pin 
connector) to twisted pair.  They are inexpensive.  Our Lantronix
ltx-t is under $90.

Many other companies make them also.
-- 
__________________________________________________
|                                                |
|	homebrew is the elixir of the gods       |
|                                                |
--------------------------------------------------
From: pablo@FibHaifa.com (Pablo Brenner)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Subject: 82596 or 82596 Public Domain drivers
Date: 15 Nov 92 09:26:08 GMT
Reply-To: pablo@picasso.FibHaifa.com
Organization: Fibronics ltd., Haifa - ISRAEL
Originator: pablo@picasso


Hi, 
	I`m posting that for a friend with no news access:
Does somebody know where can I found PD drivers for Intel 82586 or
82596?

Thanks in advance, please reply by e-mail

-- pablo
--------------------------------------------------------------
Pablo Brenner -  R&D Dept.
Fibronics Ltd., Matam Industrial Park, Haifa 31905, ISRAEL
e-mail: pablo@FibHaifa.com          Wireless: CX5YI/4X
phone: +972-4-313675                Fax: +972-4-536360
=============== Usual disclaimers apply =======================
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
Pablo Brenner -  R&D Dept.
Fibronics Ltd., Matam Industrial Park, Haifa 31905, ISRAEL
e-mail: pablo@FibHaifa.com          Wireless: CX5YI/4X
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
From: bruce@gordian.com (Bruce Hafford)
Subject: Re: LAN access over backbone
Organization: Gordian
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 02:42:58 GMT

>At our university no LAN traffic is allowed over the backbone.

Did I miss something here, or is this kind of odd?
From: ferch@ucs.ubc.ca (Les Ferch)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Subject: 10BaseT to thinwire adapter prices
Date: 19 Nov 92 06:35:16 GMT
Organization: The University of British Columbia
NNTP-Posting-Host: swiss.ucs.ubc.ca

I recently installed a Cabletron 10BaseT to thinwire adapter and it works
well. However, it's rather expensive for just adding one more connection
in an office (I think it was something like CA $700, but I didn't handle
the purchase). 

So, I'm wondering what are the best prices (educational) that you all have
seen for such devices?

Please email and I will summarize.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet