From: roby@chopin.udel.edu (Scott W Roby)
Subject: Re: It's just a TV SHOW!
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 01:54:59 GMT

[NOTE: I accidentally posted a "work in progress" in my rush 
to go to dinner.  Here is the finished "product" -- I am cancelling 
the earlier unfinished version of this post.  -S.Roby]

In article <1992Sep30.161344.1900@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>In article <SCOTTS.92Sep25153143@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU> scotts@CS.CMU.EDU (Communus 3rd of 5) writes:
>>In article <1992Sep24.211326.29359@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:

>>All that proves is that someone created an account for a Steve Chaney,
>>and that someone, not necessarily Steve Chaney, is posting from it.
>>This is no proof that you are Steve Chaney.

>My Phone #: 916-381-1296. I'm verifyable that way. Just ask for Mister
>Correctus. :)

My God!  You really are your own worst enemy!!  I think posting your 
own phone number in t.a. could be more harmful than posting one's 
SAT scores (which you had the brains not to do).

Be sure and give us an update on what kind of calls you get as a result. 
Your brave experiment could be a lesson for us all.  

>>How would you know if Dennis Hall was a prank if you didn't do it?
>
>Because of common sense, I know damned well that when you guys started this
>Dennis Hall is actually Steve Chaney, it was a prank. All the evidence, or
>absolute, complete and total lack of it on your part, points to it.

Excuse me??????
If you weren't "Dennis Hall", I would hardly think that you would 
need to review all "our evidence" in order to come to a conclusion on 
the matter.  I'm sorry -- those sentences above just don't ring true.

>SHOW US WHERE I POSTED AS DENNIS HALL.

Where?  talk.abortion and alt.sex.
When?   March, April, May, and June.
What?   Purposely lame and sexist garbage from a supposed pro-choicer
Who?    Steve Chaney posting under the fictitious name of "Dennis Hall"
Why?    Presumeably to sabotage the pro-choice side from within.

>It all comes down to that, and you cannot do it. 

Just did.

>After all this time of
>convincing yourself of this religious belief started by Scotty Dog Roby, it
>all comes down to the base fact that his lie has no factual basis
>whatsoever.

FACT: Your sys-admin told me on the phone that the account from 
which the "Dennis Hall" posts came was issued to you.

FACT: Your sys-admin told Dean K. the same thing a couple of months 
later.

FACT: Both "Dennis Hall" and you misspelled the same word over and 
over.

FACT: Both you and "Dennis Hall" used "unix" to mean Usenet.

FACT: Both you and "Dennis Hall" frequently made threats about 
other people's accounts.

FACT: "Dennis Hall" knew someone's (Keith C.?) middle name even 
though Keith(?) had only used it earlier when just you (and 
not "Dennis") was around.

FACT: Not one person from either side of the abortion debate spoke 
up to say they believed you and "Dennis Hall" were two different people.

FACT: Not once did "Dennis Hall" follow-up one of your posts or 
vice-versa.  (Kind of strange you never wanted to argue with 
this supposed pro-choicer since you seem to want to argue with 
all other pro-choicers.)

FACT: Your sys-admin laughed out loud when I related to him your 
story of how he had supposedly talked to both you and "Dennis Hall" 
at the same time.

These are some of the FACTS that I know.   

Get a life, Steve.  (But remember, only one to a customer!  :-)



-- 
Scott W. Roby           *This sentence no verb.*      "No Matter where you go..
Phys.& Astr.Dept.    ///// / /  /  *|*  \  \ \ \\\\\      there you are!"
Univ.of Delaware    ((((( ( (  (  * + *  )  ) ) )))))   -> Buckaroo Banzai
roby@brahms.udel.edu \\\\\ \ \  \  *|*  /  / / /////   *Standard Disclaimer*
Newsgroups: talk.abortion