HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: holsberg@pilot.njin.net (Peter J. Holsberg)
Newsgroups: bit.general
Subject: TCF'92 THIS WEEKEND!
Date: 6 Apr 92 18:15:07 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.


The Trenton Computer Festival 1992 will be held at Mercer College on
Saturday, April 11 (9-6) and Sunday, April 12 (10-4). 

This year's festival features:
	- The world's largest outdoor personal computer FLEA MARKET
	- Over 170 National Vendor and Commercial Booths, featuring AST,
          Adobe, Aldus, Borland, Microsoft, Lotus, Corel, Micrografx,
	  Toshiba, Hewlett-Packard, WordPerfect, Intel, Symantec, 
	  Software Publishing, and local vendors.
	- More than 125 FREE Seminars, Forums and Talks on all aspects of
	  computing.
	- Thousands of dollars worth of door prizes, including an AST 386SX
	  notebook computer, an HP color printer and an HP color scanner.
	- Saturday evening banquet features keynote speaker, Paul Grayson,
	  CEO of Micrografx. Tickets are $20 each.
	- Admission:
		General: $7 for both days; $5 for Sunday only
		Students and Seniors: $3 for both days
		Preschoolers accompanied by adult: FREE
		Other Children Under 12 accompanied by adult: $3 for both days,
			FREE on Sunday only

Files with all kinds of good information are available for anonymous
ftp from pilot.njin.net (128.6.7.38) in pub/TCF/tcf.  They include:

	what.is.TCF - history and description of TCF
	gen.info - general info about TCF, directions, parking, etc.

Pete Holsberg
TCF 92 Steering Committee
From: holsberg@pilot.njin.net (Peter J. Holsberg)
Newsgroups: bit.general
Subject: Speaker_Schedule!!
Date: 7 Apr 92 01:21:40 GMT
Article-I.D.: pilot.Apr.6.21.21.40.1992.28369
Distribution: na
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.


The speaker schedule for TCF '92 is now available via ftp to 
	pilot.njin.net

Get /pub/TCF/tcf/92-talks.

Sorry to be so late with this.

Pete
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.info-gcg
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 12:40:56 PDT
Reply-To:     LTAYLOR@UCSFCGL.BITNET
              <INFO-GCG@UTORONTO.BITNET>
Comments:     Warning -- RSCS tag indicates an origin of LTAYLOR@CGL
From:         LTAYLOR@UCSFCGL.BITNET
Subject:      GCG databases
Comments: To: cargill@galen.oci.utoronto.ca, info-gcg@utoronto.BITNET

        I want very much to buy GCG for my
large UNIX system, but I am very distressed
at having to maintain for the GCG people
 the data libraries in a format  unreadable by
the rest of my UNIX sequence analysis packages.

        Is there anywhere a set of subroutines I could
link into the GCG system to have them read the
distributed data formats  instead of the GCG formats?

        For each data library.. ( GenBank, PIR ..) you would
need  four routines:  a read,  a write, a gen_index and a fetch
by index.


        Have you heard of anyone doing this?

Leslie Taylor
ltaylor@cgl.ucsf.edu
Computer Graphics Lab
University of California at San FRancisco
513 Parnassus Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94143-0446
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:        UK.AC.ABER;  4 APR 92 19:23:59 BST
X-Mts:      smtp
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.info-gcg
Date:         Sat, 4 Apr 1992 19:25:45 +0100
Reply-To:     ato@ABER.AC.UK
              <INFO-GCG@UTORONTO.BITNET>
From:         ato@ABER.AC.UK
Subject:      An Information

I need some Information about the structure and composition of Recombination
Nodules during synaptonemal  complexes in meiosis.

for your helping, thank you.

Ahmet OKUMUS
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: info-gcg@utoronto.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"info-gcg@utoronto.bitnet"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.info-gcg
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 09:55:00 PDT
Reply-To:     MBCICERO@TWNAS886.BITNET
              <INFO-GCG@UTORONTO.BITNET>
From:         MBCICERO@TWNAS886.BITNET
Subject:      Re: S.O.S for updateing REL.29

Sabino wrote:

/   S.O.S from Sabino, Bari.

..............

/   Yet, before trasfering these files to EMBLdir, I checked them with
/   database searching programs, e.g. FINDPATTERN  and STRINGSEARCH.
/   Both gave an ERROR!!! I enclose the error conditions I get.


/  PROVA (DIB0:[sys_embnet.updata]) is the logical name where
/  created files can be found

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ STRINGSEARCH through what sequence(s) (* GenEMBL:* *) ?  Prova:*.*

/ Do you want to search through:
/
/
/     A) definitions
/
/     B) complete sequence records
 /

/ Please choose one (* A *):  B

/ Search for what text patterns ?  globin

/ What should I call the output file (* Prova.Strings *) ?

/ *** Dib0:[Sys_Embnet.Updata]Em_Ba.Seqcat;1 ***


/Access violation, reason mask=01, virtual address=41414141, PC=0006CE43,
/PSL=03C00020

/Symbolic stack dump follows
/module name     routine name             line       rel PC    abs PC
                                                   0006CE43  0006CE43
/FINDREFSTRINGS  FINDREFSTRINGS             69      000000F5  0005B775
/STRINGSEARCH    STRINGSEARCH              251      00000393  0005B593

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you ever check the protection of files?  Try this ...

  $ Dir/Protect  Dib0:[Sys_Embnet.Updata]*.*;

If all files are prtected and can not accessed by group and world, change
file mode ...

  $ Set file dib0:[sys_embnet.updata]*.*;/prot=(g:r,w:r)

If it still doesn't work, check the 69th line of subroutine FINDREFSTRINGS.
(See system support manual)

Good Luck!

Cicero Chen

System Manager

Institute of Molecular Biology,
Academia Sinica
Nankang, Taipei 11529
Taiwan R.O.C.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
X-Envelope-to: info-gcg@UTORONTO.BITNET
Importance: high
Return-Receipt-To: "Antonio R. Franco" <bf1rodri@cc.uco.es>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.info-gcg
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 11:40:00 +0200
Reply-To:     "Antonio R. Franco" <bf1rodri@CC.UCO.ES>
              <INFO-GCG@UTORONTO.BITNET>
From:         "Antonio R. Franco" <bf1rodri@CC.UCO.ES>

I would appreciate very much receiving information about the way to subscribe
to the GCG software discussion group.
Antonio R. Franco
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Cordoba (Spain)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xedit-l
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 16:52:26 EDT
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2
From:         "Mignon Erixon-Stanford,
              Academic Systems Head" <IRMSS907@SIVM.BITNET>
Subject:      NO SUBJECT

From:    Mignon Erixon-Stanford, Academic Systems Head

PUMP is a translation program which converts PROFS headers into proper RFC822,
SMTP or BSMTP format so that the notes can go to/thru the various mailers and
gateways without getting bounced. PUMP is an alternative to the PROFS Extended
Mail program. If you are interested, the author is Joe Sparrow. His email
address is jsparrow@uvvm.uvic.ca It's a great product. And you can quote me,
too!   It's available as a package on LISTSERV @ UVVM but you may need to
join the PUMP Maintainers List to get it.  Contact Joe Sparrow.  He'll know.
IRMSS907@SIVM              Research Systems Division, A&I 2310
Smithsonian Institution    Washington, DC  20560
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xedit-l
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 13:21:37 EST
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      ANONYMOU FTP of SHARE tools tape at KSUVM gets better
Comments: To: vm utilities list <vm-util@OHSTVMA.acs.ohio-state.edu>,
              XEDIT discussion list <xedit-l%uga.uga.edu@vm1.nodak.edu>,
              rexx-l%uiucvmd.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu, vmsys-l@uga.cc.uga.edu,
              TNT discussion list <tnt-l%umab@cunyvm.cuny.edu>,
              cms pipes list <cmspip-l%marist.bitnet@uga.cc.uga.edu>,
              Rice Mail <mailbook%ricevm1.bitnet@ricevm1.rice.edu>,
              PROFS discussion <profs-l@uga.cc.uga.edu>,
              rexxlist%ucf1vm.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu

  As some of you are aware, KSUVM.KSU.EDU has had available an anonymous
FTP to the the SHARE and Waterloo tools tapes.  This service has just
gotten better with the addition of a VMARC'd list of the contents of the
WORKxx.VMARC files, similiar to the TAPE MAP output.  GET TOOLLIST.VMARC
to see exactly what is in all those WORKxx.VMARC files.

  And thanks to Brick Verser <BAV@KSUVM.KSU.EDU> for doing this.

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xedit-l
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 10:59:57 MDT
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.1
From:         ROBR@NAIT.AB.CA
Comments: To: VM System Editor List <XEDIT-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>

Get XEDIT-L LOG9201
Get XEDIT-L LOG9202
Get XEDIT-L LOG9203


                        Rob Richards   Phone: (403) 471-8540
                 Northern Alberta IT   Domain: RobR@nait.ab.ca
                             E N D  O F  N O T E
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 10:15:00 CDT
From:         NIU 815 Larry Ludwig 753-1875 <A01LRL2@NIU.BITNET>
Subject:      CICS LPA response

> Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 19:46:45 -0500
> Reply-To:     IBM Mainframe Discussion list <IBM-MAIN@RICEVM1.BITNET>
> Sender:       IBM Mainframe Discussion list <IBM-MAIN@RICEVM1.BITNET>
> From:         Clyde Laushey <SSTSCSL@VCUVM1.BITNET>
> Subject:      Question on CICS/MRO and LPA modules
>
>  We are currently running MVS/XA and two CICS/MRO systems, each of which
>  has one TOR, one FOR and three AORs.  Approximately 175 CICS modules in
>  the LPA occupy about 1.7Meg.  We need to free up some Common area.
>
>  I have two questions concerning this:
>
>  1.  Which modules must be in LPA for MRO to work and which definitely
>      should be in LPA for performance reasons?   Any recommendations or
>      references to existing documentation would help.
>
>  2.  Is there a way to determine which modules are being used heavily,
>      such as execution counts by module name?
>
>  Thanks in advance for any help.
>
>      +----------------------------------------------------------------+
>      |  Clyde Laushey, Technical Services     Richmond,  VA  23219    |
>      |  Virginia Commonwealth University      Phone:  (804) 786-7166  |
>      |  110 South 7th Street,  4th Floor      Bitnet: SSTSCSL@VCUVM1  |
>      +----------------------------------------------------------------+

I have recently had the same problem, so I hope if anyone else answers
this question, they will send messages to the list.  What I am doing is
looking at the the shutdown stats at all the modules I put in LPA and
trying to determine based on usage vs module size which modules are
more useful to have in LPA.  This is the same thing I used with some
success in determining which application modules to make resident vs
loadable.  The first problem I found with this is that this will only
work for programs defined in the PPT.  None of the nucleus modules, i.e.
CICS management modules, show up in these statistics.  I hope someone
else has a better idea.

I didn't find a cross posting to the CICS list, so I'm going to do that,
as I am very interested in getting an answer to these questions myself.

Before I put most of the LPA-eligible modules in LPA, I was running
an MRO system with DFHIRP and DFHCRC in LPA for MRO purposes.  I also
had DFHVAP and DFHVSP there for VSAM subtasking.

Larry Ludwig
System programmer
Northern Illinois University

A01LRL1@NIU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 15:19:23 CST
From:         Larry Holder <##09@UTMARTN.BITNET>
Subject:      EXEC CICS ENQ

> When I issue
> EXEC  CICS ENQ R(WTPFILE) from two seperate CECI sessions I get a response
> of NORMAL from both.
> Is this NORMAL?
>  I thought I would get an ENQBUSY or something on the second request for
> the same resource name.
> Bill Pitts
> University of North Carolina
> Chapel Hill, NC 27599-1150
> BitNet: PITTS@UNC.BITNET

Sure enough, same thing happens here.  We're CICS/VSE 2.1.  Since
CECI is conversational, it should retain the ENQ until task end or
explicit DEQ.  That aside, it is either broke (I hope not) or perhaps
CECI is adding on the NOSUSPEND option and giving us a pseudo-response
of NORMAL (I hope not here, too).  My two cents worth in, I'll defer
now to a more knowledgeable answer...

Larry Holder

Senior Programmer/Analyst
The University of Tennessee at Martin Computer Center
Martin, TN  38237

Bitnet:   ##09@UTMARTN    Phone: (901) 587-7890    GUIDE: PHY
Systems:  VSE/ESA 1.1.1, CICS/VSE 2.1.0, VM/ESA 1.0
Hardware: IBM 9221-150; 9336 FBA dasd; 9348 tape; 7171 term control
New PSW:  (Personal Status Words): Saved by grace (Romans 1:16 & 8:38)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 17:27:00 LCL
From:         WTP <WTP.ADMIN@MHS.UNC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: EXEC CICS ENQ
Comments: To: LHOLDER <CICS-L@vm1.cc.uakron.edu>

I tried it again specifying the resource as a VARIABLE and providing the
LENGTH parameter from two seperate CECI sessions and THIS WORKS.

This must be the way it is indended to work or the doc in the Appl Pgmrs
Ref is not clear.

Bill Pitts
Systems Programmer
Communications
Administrative Data Processing
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-1150
BitNet: PITTS@UNC.BITNET
InterNet: WTP.ADMIN@MHS.UNC.EDU
ATTNet: (919) 966-5835

*------------------------------------*
   The opinions expressed herein
   are mine. You can't have them
*------------------------------------*
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 11:12:33 CST
From:         NREEVES@TWSUVM.BITNET
Subject:      Re: UNEnabled vs DISabled

As I understand it, a file which is unenabled can only have it --abled
state changed with CEMT. A file gets unenabled when it's in the process of
being disabled. For instance, I issue a CEMT CLOSE ENABLE; if the file
has an active string it will go into UNE (I don't remember it if's OPE or
CLO at this point) until the string is released. When the string is
released the file will become CLO DIS.

From CICS-Supplied Transactions:
"CEMT --- DATASET ---
 UNENABLED
   the data set is not available for use my applications except for
   those which are currently using it. If there are any such user,
   "DISABLING" will also be displayed.

   This status is the same as DISABLED except that it occurs implicitly
   when a SET CLOSE is requested. The difference is that in this case,
   the data set will be ENABLED implicitly by a SET OPEN."

Hope this helps.

Nancy Reeves

Techincal Support Analyst        bitnet: nreeves@twsuvm
Wichita State University         internet: nreeves@twsuvm.uc.twsu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 16:39:06 GMT
From:         PGIFFORD@ALLEGVM.BITNET
Subject:      Re: EXEC CICS ENQ

>> When I issue
>> EXEC  CICS ENQ R(WTPFILE) from two seperate CECI sessions I get a response
>> of NORMAL from both.
>> Is this NORMAL?
>>  I thought I would get an ENQBUSY or something on the second request for
>> the same resource name.
>> Bill Pitts
>
>Sure enough, same thing happens here.  We're CICS/VSE 2.1.  Since
>stuff deleted ...
>
>Larry Holder
>
Darn if it doesn't happen here, too.  CICS/VSE 1.7 VSE/SP 3.2.2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Pete Gifford           PGIFFORD@ALLEGVM
Systems Manager        PETE@MUSIC.ALLEG.EDU
Allegheny College      (814) 332-5304
Meadville, PA          (814) 332-5366
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 14:46:00 LCL
From:         WTP <WTP.ADMIN@MHS.UNC.EDU>
Subject:      EXEC CICS ENQ

To: CICS-L
Cc: BILL PITTS VIA INET

When I issue
EXEC  CICS ENQ R(WTPFILE) from two seperate CECI sessions I get a response
of NORMAL from both.

Is this NORMAL?

 I thought I would get an ENQBUSY or something on the second request for
the same resource name.

Bill Pitts
Systems Programmer
Communications
Administrative Data Processing
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-1150
BitNet: PITTS@UNC.BITNET
InterNet: WTP.ADMIN@MHS.UNC.EDU
ATTNet: (919) 966-5835

*-------------------------------------------------*
   The opinions expressed herein
   are mine. You can't have them
*-------------------------------------------------*
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL15]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 09:39:48 EDT
From:         Mott Given <ntm1169@DSAC.DLA.MIL>
Subject:      CICSPARS reports
Comments: To: CICS List <cics-l@vm1.cc.uakron.edu>

   I am puzzled by the PERFORMANCE TOTALS REPORT that I am getting from
CICSPARS V1R1.  They are reports for a system running CICS 2.1, DB2 2.2,
under ESA 3.1.0E.  I add the following fields and they come out greater than
the total CPU time reported for the PGN that the CICS region is running in:
   TOTAL CICS TIME (KCP + TCP + JCP)
   TOTAL SUBTASK TIME

I thought the TOTAL SUBTASK TIME would be recored in the same PGN (performance
group) that the CICS region was running in?
Also, is it correct to assume that the DB2 time charged back to CICS and
the VSAM subtasking is charged to the field "TOTAL SUBTASK TIME"?


Mott Given @ Defense Logistics Agency Systems Automation Center,
             DSAC-TMP, Bldg. 27-1, P.O. Box 1605, Columbus, OH 43216-5002
INTERNET:  mgiven@dsac.dla.mil   UUCP: ...{osu-cis}!dsac!mgiven
Phone:  614-238-9431  AUTOVON: 850-9431   FAX: 614-238-9928
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 09:09:59 EDT
From:         Iain Jack <COMP1022@SLCSL.BITNET>
Subject:      Distribute CICS Printing via JES2 and RSCS

We are in the design stage of a CICS application of which a requirement is the
ability to spool print to remote printers.  It is our initial thought that this
 could be  done via JES2 / RSCS. If anyone is already doing this we would appre
ciate any comments, or suggestions.
Thanking you in advance - Iain Jack.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL15]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 12:00:25 EDT
From:         Mott Given <ntm1169@DSAC.DLA.MIL>
Subject:      CICSPARS question (repost)
Comments: To: cics-l%akronvm.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu

    I am puzzled by the PERFORMANCE TOTALS REPORT that I am getting from
 CICSPARS V1R1.  They are reports for a system running CICS 2.1, DB2 2.2,
 under ESA 3.1.0E.  I add the following fields and they come out greater than
 the total CPU time reported for the PGN that the CICS region is running in:
    TOTAL CICS TIME (KCP + TCP + JCP)
    TOTAL SUBTASK TIME

 I thought the TOTAL SUBTASK TIME would be recored in the same PGN (performance
 group) that the CICS region was running in?
 Also, is it correct to assume that the DB2 time charged back to CICS and
 the VSAM subtasking is charged to the field "TOTAL SUBTASK TIME"?


 Mott Given @ Defense Logistics Agency Systems Automation Center,
              DSAC-TMP, Bldg. 27-1, P.O. Box 1605, Columbus, OH 43216-5002
 INTERNET:  mgiven@dsac.dla.mil   UUCP: ...{osu-cis}!dsac!mgiven
 Phone:  614-238-9431  AUTOVON: 850-9431   FAX: 614-238-9928
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 11:10:00 LCL
From:         WTP <WTP.ADMIN@MHS.UNC.EDU>
Subject:      UNEnabled vs DISabled

To: CICS-L

A hopefully simple question:
What is the difference between
UNEnabled and DISabled
for FILES in CICS?

Bill Pitts
Systems Programmer
Communications
Administrative Data Processing
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-1150
BitNet: PITTS@UNC.BITNET
InterNet: WTP.ADMIN@MHS.UNC.EDU
ATTNet: (919) 966-5835

*------------------------------------*
   The opinions expressed herein
   are mine. You can't have them
*------------------------------------*
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cics-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 11:29:34 EST
From:         "Matt Simpson" <SYSMATT@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
Subject:      Re: CICS LPA response

I've also been playing with putting CICS modules in LPA. I've made some
assumptions, which make sense to me, but may not be right.
For PPT modules, I look for those with a high execution count. For
nucleus modules, I'm assuming that CICS loads these one time, at region
startup. We have TMON/CICS, which shows what nucleus modules are loaded.
I assume there are other ways to find this out. If a nuclues module is
used in only one region, I see no purpose in putting it in LPA. It might
load a few milliseconds quicker from LPA, but if it only gets loaded
once at startup, who cares? If a module is used in multiple regions, I
put it in LPA. The assumption here is that it's better to have one copy
of the module in LPA than n private copies in n regions.
We don't use MRO here, so nuclei are fairly similar. With MRO, you might
end up leaving more nucleus modules out of LPA, depending on what
functions exist in how many regions.
As I said, this is based on my interpretation of how things work, and
not on any formal advice from IBM or anybody else who knows anything.
Also note - we run ACF2 for security. If you do this, notice the section
in the ACF2 manual that says you can not run DFHKCP and DFHPCP from LPA.
I didn't notice this the first time, and the region crashed and burned
at startup.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.c18-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 20:18:36 EDT
From:         Irwin Primer <primer@ANDROMEDA.RUTGERS.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Gulliver and Monsters

Didn't Fiedler do a book on freaks a while back?  I think traces of his
illustrations are still lurking on my retinas.  There's an annual
bibliography of the history of medicine that should be consulted (how useful
it would be to have that database online).  Is it a safe guess that we'd
probably find more monsters in 17th-century lit than in 18th-c?
I. Primer         primer@andromeda.rutgers.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Envelope-to: C18-L@PSUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"C18-L%PSUVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: BAER
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.c18-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 16:15:00 CST
From:         BAER@MACALSTR.EDU
Subject:      Re: Internet access software for library catalogs

The following comes from Macalester's Computer Services
programmer, Geri Olson:


Mark Resmers program is available through anonymous FTP from
sonoma.edu, in the directory /pub.  The version we use will
only run on a VAX (libs.com).  Theres another version called
libs.sh that will run on a Unix system, but I don't know if
it's complete or not.

Geri Olson
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU