HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: EFS6ET1@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU
Subject: DOOL: That FAX # (was: SAVE SSH -- Write NBC's John Miller)
Reply-To: ecz5mxr@mvs.oac.ucla.edu
Date: 12 Jan 93 12:21:11 PST

In article <93012.080939IDSWB@ASUACAD.BITNET>, on 12 Jan 1993 08:09:39 MST,
<IDSWB@ASUACAD.BITNET> writes:

>Sis Razzie says:
>>I thought DOOL viewers might be interested in writing to JOHN MILLER
>>to save SSH.  Miller is executive vice president, advertising and
>>promotion and daytime and children's programs, NBC Entertainment.
>>
>>WRITE or CALL:
>>John Miller
>>Executive VP, Advertising and Promotion and Daytime Programs
>>c/o NBC-TV
>>3000 West Alameda Ave.
>>Burbank  CA  91523
>>
>>And that NBC switchboard number:  818-840-4444.

>Quince inquires:
>Razzie, can we address a fax to the fax number (818) 840-4968 and be
>assurred that he'll get it?  If that's the case, I think I'll send my
>large letter that I posted a couple of weeks ago to him.  I still have
>it on disk and all it'll take is changing the TO part.  Good idea to
>address mail to him.

The FAX number that we have been posting is the FAX number for the
DOOL productions office (where Tom Langan, Becky Greenlaw, Francesca
James and, occasionally, Ken Corday, are).  The DOOL writers can also
be faxed there.  I am told that DOOL does not forward faxes sent to
that number.  So if you want to contact Susan Lee or John Miller,
phone or write.  (Unless someone can find their FAX number!)

>>And to answer an earlier post by June, I thought we'd try and keep
>>this up (the SAVE SSH campaign) until at least her last airdate (or
>>until we save her!)
>
>Good idea Razzie!
>
>Sis Quince

*Razzie (one more time)  FAX, PHONE, MAIL, SAVE SSH!
From: cpatters@ub.d.umn.edu (Granma)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN - 1993
Date: 7 Jan 1993 12:11:04 -0600
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu

In article <1993Jan5.172159.8929@athena.mit.edu> zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria) writes:
>
>I'd like to see some! I'll ask again....:-) AnyBUDy?

Hi CAZ!  Ya!  How about granma@malibu.rum.walker.wheelie

Granma
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: 6310550@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Subject: Re: AMC: update for 01/11
Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 14:50:44 PST

------------------------- Original Article -------------------------
            **** update deleted *****
Unanswered Questions:

> 1) Did Nat and Trevor celebrate Boxing day?
What is Boxing day ?

> 2) Is it possible that Bobby is living with the Kennekott's?
Nah, He is living with the bird lady in Home Alone II.

> 3) How many beds does PV hospital have?
2.

4) What did Dr. Joe get Ruth for Christmas?
A pair of warm fuzzy slippers (to match the robe & got her last year),
flannel sheets & a breadmaker !

5) Is there a Victoria's Secret in the PV mall.
Sure is!!!  Can you imagine Erica or Brook shopping at Fredrics ?

6) If Trevor watches "Loving," Isn't he going to wonder
   why Jerermy is on TV?
He isn't allowed to watch soaps.  Only cartoons (Sylvester & Tweety)
and sports (so he can get his beer quota in)...

7) Does Tad wear boxers or briefs?
BOXERS... Silk, black silk... (YUMMMM)

8) Is the orsini vinyard's motto: "We'll treat you
   like family?"
"We'll MAKE you family. (especially if you're as cute as TAD)

9) What is the weirdest request the consierge at the
   valley inn has received?

10) Is Alfred Vanderpool still a virgin?
    (By law, this question must be asked once
     a year)

Not after Liza "discovered" him...

11) When will Lovebug Jr. be kidnapped?

Have fun!

--
				| Dave Vollman (HASA "S" Division)
  If I have a choice for the	| AT&T Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL
  next life, trained seal is 	| Email: dwv@ihlpm.att.com
  looking damn good!		| AT&T would never let ME speak for THEM!
From: sher@umbc3.umbc.edu (Sherri Crain)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Bridgette's child as the penultimate GL character
Date: 6 Jan 1993 00:55:54 -0500
Organization: Univ. of MD, Baltimore County
NNTP-Posting-Host: umbc4.umbc.edu

In article <C0E3w1.83z@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jbeason@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Joseph E. Beason) writes:
>Well, the show has been REALLY good lately.  The Maureen/Lillian blowout
>was incredible, the Maureen/Maureen's daughetr whose name escapes me 
>interaction was excellent.  I didn't think Ed's acting was up to the level
>of the women and girl.  

   I agree 100%  Finally,they bring out the actress in Maureen (her
real name escapes me),only to kill her off.  I thought she acted exactly
the way a woman in her position would've reacted.  She was excellent.
I think I'm actually going to miss Mo...what a concept!

Also,I loved the scenes with Mo and Michelle.  And,Ed seems to be lost
without Mo already...I am going to have to grab some tissue when they
pull the plug on Mo and show Michelle and Ed's reaction.  I imagine
Lil will be pretty upset too.


>I LOVED the new Mindy, slight twang, looks a bit older, 

  I don't like the new Mindy so far.  She has some weird accent that
I can't figure out.  Did you note the way she pronounces Julie?  Where
did they find this one?

>great brother/sister stuff.  Dylan actually had some energy
>for a change.

These scenes were well written,but I don't feel any warmth coming
from this new Mindy.  She's supposed to have missed her brother and
I just don't feel it.  Dylan,on the other hand,is showing his acting
ability,to some extent.

-- 

     Lack of planning on your part                 -sher   
doesn't justify an emergency on my part     sher@umbc3.umbc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: bab2@nestor.cc.bellcore.com (barter,elizabeth)
Subject: DOOL: TAN  - Another New Peel
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 15:50:45 GMT

Sisters, brothers & friends - lend me your ears!
(oops, sorry, been reading too much again)

It's just recently come to light that I've been
suffering from amnesia.  After intensive hynosis,
I now know that my name isn't really Beth, it's
Cranberry!  Yes, I am a long-lost Peel.  Thankfully, 
I do remember our Mom, Emma, but Dad is still a bit fuzzy.
I'm working on it, though.  My hypnotist feels maybe
this inability to focus on Dad may be the reason I
got amnesia in the first place.  Who knows?  

Anyway, I'm glad to be back with the family at long
last!

Cranberry (formerly Beth)
              ___                           
             /\  \    
            /  \/ \                                               
       ___  \   O /  ___   It is better to be a fool than to be dead.
      /    \ \   / /    \            - Robert Louis Stevenson
     /   __ -    -  __   \                              
    /___/ | <>   <> | \___\   
    O  ___|    ^    |___  O
     /     \  -^-  /    \    Beth Barter
    /   /\  \_____/ /\   \    Bellcore
    \_ / /          \ \_ /   Livingston, NJ
    O   /   /\   /\  \  O   bab2@nestor.cc.bellcore.com
         \ /  \ /  \ /   
          O    O    O





Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: gibbsm@ll.mit.edu (MargAret D Gibbs)
Subject: AMC: unlurking
Organization: MIT Lincoln Lab, Lexington, MA
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 16:28:18 GMT


The below is posted for Carol S. Boshears:

*****


From: Carol.S.Boshears@ISL1.RI.CMU.EDU
Message-Id: <726852657/feline@ISL1.RI.CMU.EDU>

Since I've been reading r.a.t.s. for quite a while and have
	 corresponded with a few of you (Mike at B.U. and
	 Margaret;thanks guys), I thought I should finally reveal
	 myself.  I've watched AMC almost since its inception, except
	 when at college many moons ago.  I've been married a long,
	 long time and Jim and I work at Carnegie Mellon U.  I'm in the
	 Robotics Dept.(best dept. on campus!)  Until recently we
	 raised Russian Blue cats for 16 years;all are altered now.
	 We're baseball, sci-fi, fossil and animal freaks. 
	 I'm originally from Scranton, PA, as I've noticed a new person
	 there that posted(we know your registrar.Really like Farleys
	 too.)
	Some of my recent thoughts on AMC:
Mr. U returns and kidnaps Lovebug(P.W. Cortlandt;of course), heinous
	 crime.
Since Langely seemed to have forgotten where he lives, a very impt.
	 Altzheimer storyline is in order.(It's time this was dealt
	 with I believe.)
Jackson has become a desperate wimp; totally out of character.
Lucci's performances have been very good.
Can't stand Brian or BD and Dixie as a pair(they have never convinced
	 me.)
Glad 'bout Tad-needed some young blood. Tired of these old men getting
	 all the young girls.
Glo needs a brain transplant and instructions on how you "play" with
	 fire!
Let's cull the herd-hammer Hamil, heave-ho Henderson.  Well, I've been
	 too long and will cease for now.  Hope this gets to you all.
	 Enjoy you guys a lot.
Carol(feline)@bball.shopping.trek.meowwww

*****

-- 
Margaret D. Gibbs              "Practice random kindness and 
Assistant Staff	                 senseless acts of beauty"
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
gibbsm@ll.mit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: nan@ravel.udel.edu (Nanette Reisor)
Subject: Re: GH:  Jack's Place (Finola Hughes)
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 18:29:47 GMT

In article <8950@lhdsy1.lahabra.chevron.com> njs@mrtoad.lahabra.chevron.com writes:
=>In article <4750018@hpindda.cup.hp.com>, may@hpindda.cup.hp.com (May Lee) writes:
=>|> 
=>|> For all Finola Hughes Fans.....
=>|> 
=>|> Jack's Place is coming back on Thursday January 14.  Just saw a cute
=>|> promo commercial for it last night on ABC.  If I remember correctly
=>|> the show aired at 10PM and was an hour long.
=>|> 
=>
=>  I believe it is to air at 9PM EST/PST -  ABC has a successful PrimeTime
=>  Live at 10PM.
=>


I thought they said January 12th. Must be my cold.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                                                       Nanette Reisor
        |\| /-\ |\|                                       CNS/MIS
     nan@brahms.udel.edu                           University of Delaware
From: GC.AVW@forsythe.stanford.edu (RAGIN CAJUN)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Bridgette's child as the penultimate GL character
Date: 8 Jan 1993 01:01:21 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <C0E3w1.83z@news.cso.uiuc.edu>,
jbeason@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Joseph E. Beason) writes:
>Well, the show has been REALLY good lately.  The Maureen/Lillian blowout
>was incredible, the Maureen/Maureen's daughetr whose name escapes me
>interaction was excellent.  I didn't think Ed's acting was up to the level
>of the women and girl.
>
>Harley and Mallet were great.  I LOVED the new Mindy, slight twang, looks
>a bit older, great brother/sister stuff.  Dylan actually had some energy
>for a change.
>
>Anyway: Bridgette's child is genetically a Bauer-Thorpe and will be
>socialized (for awhile, at least) by Cooper-Lewises.  The only big bloodlines
>left are the Spauldings and Reardons (which are admittedly pretty weak these
>days).  Now, if Nola's child comes in, that brings in Chamberlain and
                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Reardon genes, Bridgette's child marries that one, and the said offspring
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Whoa!  That would be marrying off first cousins, boy, would they
have a story line.

>will be mistakenly raised by Eleni's kid, who has married Kat.  The child
>can be a muliple personality (would have to be, almost) and all the plotlines
>could revolve around him/her...
>
>Joe
>

Great plot though.

Alma
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Tuesday, 5 Jan 1993 10:33:13 MST
From: <IDSWB@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: TAN: Lemon's Back

*Stuff about a sis needing bifocles deleted*
>
Joanna inquires:
>JoJo the Lemonhead -- how will I ever catch up on 2 weeks worth of
>                      posts?  :)

I respond:
Oh Joanna, you really had me rolling in the aisles on this one.  You
wondering how you're ever going to get caught up on posting.  Betcha
it won't take you long at all :-)  It sure was tough trying to keep the
net active in your and everyone else's absence.  However, I think we did
a pretty good job of it.  Let's see now, was it Boysie that said she didn't
plan on doing any work during the holidays?  I really think that all of us
that we working these last two weeks had a vacation with pay.  All we had
to do was to make an entrance to the workplace.  With everyone else gone,
it was a piece of cake.  Let's hear it for more holidays like this one.

A happy because she got a vacation within a vacation, kinda Quince

 **************Don't start posting unless you have plenty of time************
 *                                                                          *
 * There are new territories to explore and *  IDSWB@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU     *
 * conquer - so do it.        Spread your   *  Arizona State University     *
 * wings and go in search of new horizons.  *  Place usual disclaimer here  *
 *                      ASU Pegasus         *                               *
 *                                                                          *
 *   S   E       O       S   E       O       S    E      O       S   E      *
 *    M L      R  W       M L       R W       M L       R W       M L       *
 *     I      F    N       I       F   N       I       F   N       I        *
 *************************It's addicting*************************************
From: rforster@galaxy.gov.bc.ca (Russ Forster)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: Y&R: Update 2-Jan-1993
Date: 5 Jan 93 22:47:42 -0800
Reply-To: RFORSTER@GALAXY.GOV.BC.CA
Distribution: na
Organization: BC Systems Corporation

In article <1993Jan5.182516.12079@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>, connie@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (CK) writes:
> 
> Russ - thank you VERY much for that great update!!!  Keep
> up the good work!!
> 
> Did Michael plan for the pictures to be delivered to the jury at that
> precise time?  Just wonder why he got furious....
> 
	yes it was all part of his plan.

> Victoria confessed to Nikky that she detests sex??  I am so glad
> that Victor left while they talked.  He is just so obnoxious and
> pig/pin headed.  He needs to be brought back to Earth by someone
> putting a big foot up his butt.  Or better yet - by someone taking
> his business(es) away from him!
> 
	She only confessed that Ryan was not asking her to do anything
	kinky.  Regarding Victor I agree completely.
> 
> Michael from Berlin - I know that you like Victor but if you
> could just see how he is acting...
> 
> Do you think that Victoria is going to find the ripped up letter
> than Ryan was writing?
> 
	No.  I'm pretty sure Ryan took it with him.

> Also, even though I saw the show where Danny was drugged, thanks
> to the person that suggested that Michael was going to make it
> look like it was his ex-wife in the pictures.
> That never dawned on me...
> 
	I didn't think of Hillary either.

> Thanks again Russ!

	Your Welcome!!
-- 
Regards,

Russ Forster (postmaster), Sr. Technical Analyst, MultiVendor Group
BC Systems Corp., 4000 Seymour Place, Victoria, B.C., V8X 4S8
Internet: RForster@Galaxy.Gov.BC.CA       Phone: (604) 389-3186
From: patricia@pete.uucp (Patricia Peterson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: resolutions/email/names
Date: 10 Jan 93 00:13:21 GMT
Reply-To: patricia%pete%nicmad%astroatc.uucp@spool.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: My system in Madison WI

In <1993Jan8.005328.26737@Princeton.EDU> carol@ivy.Princeton.EDU (Carol Agans) writes:
>Preferred email address:

>carol@sidewalk.cafe.Paris.NOW



>To change or not change your name:

>Go ahead and change it; I hate all this women's rights stuff.  If it
>weren't for all those old women libbers,
>women wouldn't have to go to work every
>lousy day :)   Besides, it's not like the man MAKES you do it.  It's
>a nice gesture to say you love him enough to want to join him in name,
>as well as marriage.



Can we please remember that some of us work because we have to, not
because we want to.  My mother also worked because she had to and I
don't remember hearing about any woman's lib in the 40's & 50's.

If it is a nice gesture to change your name to show how much you love
someone, then why don't more men take their wives name??????


Patricia


>-- 
>Carol Jean Agans                                       carol@ivy.Princeton.EDU
>*******************************************************************************
>"Escapee" -- the pea that rolls off your dinner plate

-- 
Patricia Peterson   (608)273-4573
Inet: patricia%pete%nicmad%astroatc.uucp@spool.cs.wisc.edu
From: sheila.mcmahon.3@nd.edu (Sheila McMahon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: ATWT: Test
Date: 6 Jan 93 15:38:29 GMT
Reply-To: sheila.mcmahon.3@nd.edu
Organization: Computer Science, Indiana University
X-Nupop-Charset: English

Sorry folks...Just another test...ignore me again!!

Irish



******************************************************************
Sheila M. McMahon                        Administrative Computing
University of Notre Dame                 400 Administration Bldg.
                                         Notre Dame, Indiana 46556
sheila.mcmahon.3@nd.edu                  (219) 631-6435
******************************************************************
From: lcheap@cac.washington.edu (Laurel Cheap )
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Angel's leaving?
Date: 5 Jan 1993 22:05:33 GMT
Organization: UW Computing
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: redx.cac.washington.edu

In article <1993Jan3.110011.5031@news.cs.indiana.edu>, "Stephen Guthrie" <guthrie@moose.cs.indiana.edu> writes:
|> Am I the only one who think Season Hubley was doing a great job?  I
|> thought she did WONDERS for a basically boring character.  I am very
|> sad to see her go!  Why doesn't AMC start with the obviously bad
|> actors...Stephen Hamilton (I swear he looks like someone who should
|> be starring in an XXX film), or, as someone else said, Galen...

So THAT'S why he looks so familiar!  >;-)

-Laurel
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jackie8@dasher.cc.bellcore.com (Jackie Brady)
Subject: SIS: Frankie is such a nozzle
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 18:27:30 GMT

I am not looking to get into the stay-at-home-mom vs.
working-mom flamefest, and I will try and remember that
this is *only* a tv show...

With all the trouble and expense and time and cooperation
that went into conceiving Thomas, does anyone else think
that Frankie may not be a great candidate for a mom? I mean,
she doesn't seem very interested in being a mom.  I am *not*
knocking women who choose to go back to work, but Frankie doesn't
even seem to want to consider other possibilities.  She's just
TOO eager.  If I were Mitch I'd be reacting the same way.

And how many of us could just predict that she wouldn't get
home by the time she promised.  The very first night she breaks
her promise to cut down on her hours. And *then* she tries to
lay it off on Mitch like as if the few times that he covered
for his manager and worked late even stack up to the 8 days
a week that Frankie always seemed to work.  I bet Mitch ends
up being Mr. Mom.

I loved the way they handled the made for tv movie aspect.
I think that storyline has tons of possibilities for upcoming
eps.

Why doesn't Reed have a purpose in being there. Let's see a 
storyline with her. Besides the "We don't have any money but
I love you to death" storyline.

Teddy & Simon:  It's too bad that didn't work out. I'd like to
see that develop a little more. Maybe they'll decide to move into
a place that they buy together. Then it wouldn't be his, wouldn't
be hers, it'd be both. Great chemistry with those two. I held my
breath for a second when they were speaking toward the end. I thought
for a second that they were going to end their relationship.  Whew!

Just all MHO.  Flames to /dev/null. :-)

Jackie
---
Jackie Brady				   jackie8@dasher.cc.bellcore.com       908-699-5458				   Keep the Homefires Burning!!!!
(do not reply to the address in "From:" section. Use id in .sig to reply)
I don't speak for anyone but me, and even then, who listens to *me*???
From: kgorman@star-trek.bbn.com (Karen Gorman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Spoiler: Maureen's episode (1/11/93)
Date: 12 Jan 1993 14:19:44 GMT
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: kgorman@BBN.COM (Karen Gorman)
NNTP-Posting-Host: archive.bbn.com


In article <1993Jan12.052627.21306@seas.gwu.edu> nreich@seas.gwu.edu (Norman Reich) writes:

>This is the first time that I've ever posted, so I hope that I'm
>not making any fatal mistakes.

Looks fine to me, and well within the posting rules...Good job!

>I was wondering if anybody would happen to know the name and artist
>of the song that was played during the ending credits of the show
>......(1/11/93).

Linda Ronstadt
"Goodbye My Friend"

From the "Cry Like a Rainstorm Howl Like the Wind" album.

>Thanks, in advance. :)

You're welcome!


Karen
kg@bbn.com
From: bo643@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Frederick E. Vaughn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: GL-I'm Clueless!!
Date: 11 Jan 1993 19:30:25 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bo643@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Frederick E. Vaughn)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I hate to sound like I'm a bit behind on some things, but...

WHEN DID MAUREEN FIND OUT AND WHAT DID SHE SAY TO ED?
""   ""  ""      ""   ""  ""  ""   ""  ""  ""  "" LILLIAN?

DIRT!!!!!!!!!

FRED  
-- 
********** fvaughn@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (PRIMARY)
FREDERICK* bo643@cleveland.freenet.cwru.edu (SECONDARY) 
ELOY	 *"R - E - S - P - E - C - T."
VAUGHN   *
From: rose@cecily.UUCP (Rose M. Delckum)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Stuff
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 16:19:55 GMT
 <kfH5Rt600VpO0FE0Ve@andrew.cmu.edu>
Distribution: world
Organization: The New Alaska Riviera
X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00 beta rel2

In article <kfH5Rt600VpO0FE0Ve@andrew.cmu.edu>, Marcus Wilhelm Banzhaf writes:

> 
> Joanna wrote:
> 
> *I like this version of Jack better than the "liesure suit" version 
> *from this same time last year.  But, I still don't think he's ready
> *to face up to the "reality" of getting the Spectator back.  I sure
> *do wish the writers had just decided to have Baby Howie's grandpa 
> *die and leave the money to J&J in his will as some sort of atonement.
> *I'd be much happier with that resolution to the money problem.
> 
> Or better yet have Nick come back and return the money he stole from
> Jack.  Anyone remember back when Jack was still kind of evil.  An old
> buddy of Nick's had come to Salem to find the money (2 million dollars)
> that they had stolen from the Devereux's.   Nick was later in the
> hospital for plastic surgery and Jack confronted Nick about it and told
> him he wanted nothing now but someday Nick would owe him.  

     Sorry Marcus, but that's impossible (much as I would like to
see it!).  When Nick 'died', he left all his money to Eve,
provided she marry for love, and Julie was to be th ejudge as to
whether the marriage was one of true love.  Julie agreed to lie
for Eve and let her marry Jack.  Jack somehow stole all of Nick's
money from Eve, leaving her penniless.  That's when Eve followed
J&J to LA on their honeymoon and bawled Jack out for it, and Hawk
overheard them and latched on the the Devereauxs.  So Jack not
only lost all of the Devereaux money, he also lost all of Nick
and Eve's money.

> 
> -marcus

     Roserooni
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can blow out a candle        |      Rose Delckum
 But you can't blow out a fire,   |      rose@cecily.UUCP
 Once the flames begin to catch   |      rose%cecily@uunet.uu.net    
 The wind will blow them higher"  |      uunet!coplex!cecily!rose
             --Peter Gabriel      |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------