HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Date: 21 Nov 92 01:11:57 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

>In article <1992Nov17.162705.24794@galileo.physics.arizona.edu>, krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes: 
> But he has already promised to screw up, by saying that he will remove 
> the ban on gays in the military, etc.  I have not heard one of his 100 
> day promises which is not a screw up, at least IMO, therefore, as far 
> as I am concerned, HE ALREADY HAS SCREWED UP!!!

I remember the broo-ha-ha that surround the racial integration of the Armed
Services...   Lotta good-ol-boys were sure that "niggras" weren't capable
of serving next to "white folx".  Predicted that this was the biggest
screw up since the abolition of slavery.   Some of them were pretty subtle
about it too... didn't talk about the ability of the black servicemen - they
talked about the ability of the white majority to trust and serve with the
blacks.   "Nothin against dem black folx... it's just that it would prevent
the military from working together right."

Well, we've seen how our integrated service did in recent action.
How much better could you have expected them to perform in Desert Storm
if it had been all white and all black companies?  I doubt the army
has been hurt through racial integration, in spite of the old racisms
expressed in the mid '50s.

Seems like I hear a lot of this tired old bullshit nowadays...   some people
say "Gays can't cut it".  Others say "It would decrease the efficiency of
the hetero guys if they had to run from foxhole to foxhole with one hand
covering thier tuckus".   But it's still the same old song...   hate the one
who is different so as to make yourself feel better.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.irc,talk.abortion
From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: ATTENTION!!!
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 05:11:33 GMT

<BxI8IG.873@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
><1992Nov10.002342.22401@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney):
>>After weeks of painstaking construction and programming, we now have a
>>channel on IRC (Internet Relay Chat) devoted to... you guessed it...
>>DITTOHEADS.
>>
>>Go to the channel #Limbaugh and you will find the DittoBot, a new bot
>>I have put together to run this channel; in addition, you might find
>>other Rush Limbaugh fans. 
>
>...or, more likely, we'll just find you acting like a robot, which is more of
>the same old story.
>
>>#Limbaugh was designed as a gathering ground for us conservative
>>thinkers, to talk to each other when we are not huddled around the
>>last great bastion of conservative power in the world, for 3 hours a 
>>day.
>
>...or when you (the specific, not the general) are threatening other folks
>on Usenet through a different network.

Geez, is Chaney still talking about taking over the government, like the
peaceful pro-lifer that he is?

I was in Egghead the other day and I thought of Chaney...  needless to say
I didn't buy anything.


Gordon
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller)
Subject: Re: thEwIndBag bashes Rev. Jackson, again
Reply-To: ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller)
Organization: St. Elizabeth Hospital, Youngstown, OH
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 01:17:55 GMT


In a previous article, leffel@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Christopher J Leffel) says:

>From article <19NOV199211484948@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu>, by mitcheec@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu (Elliott Mitchell):
>
>[Rush Bashing Deleted]
>
>I have no problem that you disagree with Rush...  but I would like to draw
>your attention to the fact that this newsgroup is called 
>
>alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
>    ^^^
>
>The posting of such material to this group is just flame-bating...  Please
>direct any further thoughts such as these to alt.rush-limbaugh.

You know, I'm starting to get REAL annoyed at this idiot constantly calling 
for others not to post any anti-Limbaugh statement to this newsgroup.

This is NOT Limbaugh's monitored, exclusive access radio program, it is a 
public access computer newsgroup, open for all who wish to post.  So long
as folks posting here are permitted to slam anyone who is not a good little
Limbot, resistance and decsent should be expected.

Further, at least at my server, the alt.rush-limbaugh group is an ALIAS group
to this one...In case you don't know, anything I post there ends up here.

I believe Limbaugh is a self-serving moron, and I will continue to post that
opinion here.   

 

>-- 
>-------------------------leffel@csd4.csd.uwm.edu--------------------------
>"Don't you try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my
>breakfast cereal."    -The Restaurant at the End of the Universe-
>
-- 
*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  /\/\   HATE IS NOT A  *         
*                    Kelley L. Miller  / /  \  FAMILY VALUE   *            
*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  / /____\                *  
*     GIGO: Gospel In--Garbage Out   /______\                 *
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.folklore.urban
From: davew@willow03.cray.com (Dave Wagner)
Subject: Re: Tomorrow's Conspiracy Theory, brought to you today.
Originator: davew@willow03
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:18:50 CST


In article <1992Nov15.213820.15799@midway.uchicago.edu>, pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (George Jetson) writes:
> 
> (This really belongs in a politics group; I don't do politics groups
> 	[AFR being the closest thing...])
         ^^^

I've been looking for alt.folklore.republican and still can't find it.  Any
sites out there get it?

-- 
Dave Wagner                                     Cray Research, Inc
davew@cray.com , uunet!cray!davew               655F Lone Oak Drive
(612) 683-5393                                  Eagan, MN  55121
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8729 alt.politics.clinton:17362 alt.politics.bush:13941
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: Electoral Mandate?
From: jtinkle@sparc1.sparc1.csubak.edu (j. tinkle )
Date: 17 Nov 92 12:59:51 PST
Organization: California State University, Bakersfield

In article <1992Nov6.140922.25193@fia.dmg.ml.com> jogulin@pub_one.fia.dmg.ml.co
m (Milamber) writes:
>The fact that Billy-boy won with less than 50% of the popular vote is what's
>really scary.
Not in a three-way race.  Be careful of that.
 
>==> "You never f**king know the answer when it's important." --The Doctor <==
>Joe Ogulin
>
>jogulin@camelot.fia.dmg.ml.com		joe@stardock.pilot.dmg.ml.com
>jogulin@apollo.stevens-tech.edu		gcs_jogulin@stevens.bitnet
>
>Disclaimer:  The above article is solely my opinion and does not necessar-
>ily reflect that of my employer.  The content is my responsibility alone.
Jennifer, proud originator of the "President Clinton" thread on alt.rush-l.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Forget Rush and the Comedy Channel!  What's DOONESBURY (Trudeau) going to do?
I'd prefer he go on the lecture circuit, instead of more stupid cartoons
about that quintabizillionaire that lives on an island with his plain assist-
ant.  Wouldn't it figure I'd have to join alt.poltics.flame.flame.flame. to
spawn my first thread?
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8918 talk.abortion:48910
From: gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: rights and responsibilities
Keywords: abortion, slavery
Date: 19 Nov 92 20:35:35 GMT
Organization: Stay Awake Software

<1992Nov17.232302.14811@jetsun.weitek.COM> nadja@jetsun.weitek.COM (Nadja Adolf) said:
>In article <1992Nov17.140112.28381@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> psmith@iies.ecn.purdue.edu (Paul Smith) writes:
...
>>I used to think sex was "important" outside of making babies.  
>>Now that I have two children I realize that this is utterly false.
>>And when you make one that you keep you might realize that, too.
>
>I assume that you only have sex when you intend a conception?

Apparently.

>>I'm not asking you to stop eating, sleeping, etc.  I'm not even asking 
>>you to stop having sex.  I'm asking *everyone* to stop killing babies.
>>Can you understand that??  There *is* a big difference.
>
>Excuse me, but you just told to abstain from having sex. My contraception
>is none of your damn business. Take your God and shove it.

And what does that have to do with killing babies?  At least he got it
right:  There is a difference between killing babies and having sex.


Gordon
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch Day 15
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: usa
Date: 24 Nov 92 04:21:12 GMT

In <knauer.722560574@pegasus.cs.uiuc.edu> knauer@pegasus.cs.uiuc.edu (Rob Knauerhase) writes:

>In <grendel.722542135@camelot> grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:
>>It is a waste of bandwidth because it makes a pointless statement.  Basically
>>it says "I LIKE RUSH!"
>>SO WHAT?

>It doesn't just say that Mr. Switzer likes Rush.

>Many, many people (especially "liberals" but even some "conservatives")
>predicted that Rush's show would end if Mr. Clinton were elected.  Switzer's
>reminders serve as reaffirmation to the faithful and taunts to the intolerant.

Mr. Switzer could be much more efficient by monitoring Rush' success
on his own time, and making a SINGLE post several months from now.  Then
he could get a good laugh at the idiots' expense, and the rest of us
wouldn't have to plow though his day-by-day redundancies.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 12:29:40 EST
From: <ADB103@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Are the Grateful Dead running the country?

Ever notice how CNN regularly monitors/reports on this band and its members
activties?  Ever notice Clinton/Gore sporting "92 Summer Tour" tye dyes?  I
Saw Al Gore backstage at the Grateful Dead concert at Washington's R.F.K.
Stadium.  And they say there's no such thing as a liberal conspiracy.
    I guess it doesn't matter anymore.....
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: kamilewi@lars.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Alex Kamilewicz)
Subject: Re:  New details on our first lady!
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 20:23:30 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.181859.25792@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> htuttle@nyx.cs.du.edu (Harry Tuttle) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.221203.14538@news.stolaf.edu> kamilewi@lars.acc-adm
>n.stolaf.edu (Alex Kamilewicz) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov15.183910.18659@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> htuttle@nyx.cs.d
>.edu (Harry Tuttle) writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>In a previous article, Larry Henson writes:
>>>
>>>[wonderfully witty and politically savvy material deleted]
>>>
>>>Gee, Larry.  It took three of you to write that?  Wow.
>>>And you are only in high school?  Wow again.
>>>
>>>Well, I guess even 16-year olds can have a complete lack of 
>>>comprehension and understanding of the issues.
>>>
>>>Hey, I hate him, but at least Rush is funny. I can't believe that
>>>you would waste all of that time and disk space to write something
>>>that trite and ridiculous.
>>>
>>>Kid, it wasn't political satire.  It was drivel.
>>>
>>>Oh well, what can you expect from a high schooler?                  
>>> 
>>>Go back to the mall.
>>>
>>>"We're all in this together."
>>>Harry Tuttle
>>>                   
>>
>>Well, that accomplished a lot.  I think you really made a constructive
>>criticism on them.  Really convinced me.
>>
>>Ever thought of using intelligence in your arguments?  Stop writing just
>>to inflate your ego, will you?
>>
>>Alex
>>
>>
>
>
>
>You know, I _would_ use facts and issues, but there always seems to
>be some trigger-happy flamer out there who likes to inflate my ego even
>more.  
>
>Now stop whining, Alex, or I shall taunt you a second time. :)
>
>Harry "Ego as big as Rush's girth" Tuttle
>

No, you would use facts and issues, except that you don't have any to stand on.

Stop your driveling, or I shall unclench my buttocks in your direction.

Alex "trigger-happy, ego-boosting, conservative-baiting (and boy does it work)"
Kamilewicz
From: cress@endeavor.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Think about it
Date: 15 Nov 1992 10:37:16 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: endeavor.ksu.ksu.edu
Keywords: commie-libs




     Folks, I have been seeing a lot of people calling Limbaugh some kind of a
right wing blowhard.  Maybe you should try to get off the influence of the commie
liberal press.  If the press was naturally conservative and then some liberal got
his own radio talkshow, everyone would be bitchin about what he was sayin and
call him some kind of radical freak.  You can't argue with Limbaugh.  Sure he 
expresses his opinion, that's what he's about, but he also backs it up with hard 
facts and you can't refute the facts unless you're delusional.  I think it's
about time the conservatives had their views expressed to a wider audience
instead of the press having a stranglehold on the American public.

                                           the gmeister


Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: htuttle@nyx.cs.du.edu (Harry Tuttle)
Subject: Re: Sniveling Whiny Conservatives
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 22:38:45 GMT

In article <92324.214412KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt 
udwick) writes:
>In article <1992Nov13.230713.5176@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, htuttle@nyx.cs.d
.edu
>(Harry Tuttle) says:
>
>>Rush and the Rushettes that listen to him are beginning to sound like
>>the bad guys in a Scooby Doo cartoon after they are caught:
>
>>"Ooohhh.  Why you little...Bush would have gotten away with it, if it
>>wasn't for you snooping liberals!"
>
>Though you're wrong in your observations, this is kind of funny.  (Furth
r
>confusion for you...  still baffled by my Quayle-joke?)
>
>>I mean, my God, he's married to a strong woman, too!  What on earth is
>>this country coming to?
>
>I know!  Just like Dan Quayle and George Bush!  How awful!
>
>>Rush is undeniably a mega-celebrity in the state-of-the-art,
>>electronically sophisticated medium that is AM radio.  His listeners
>>number into the hundreds and people all over the country listen to
>>him every day because they really have nothing better to do.  Some
>>even summarize every single one of his shows.  Wow, he must be big.
>
>You're still expecting him to be off the air by the end of the year, are
't
>you?
>
>Say, have you checked the Nielsens lately?
>
>------------
>Kurt Ludwick
>------------


 
Kurt, he's not gone yet.  You really have to stop taking me so literally.
The end of Limbaugh will not occur immediately, but I will make 
a prediction:

By Dec. 31, 1993, Rush Limbaugh will:

(a) drop off the face of the earth a la Philip Michael Thomas;

(b) be cancelled in every market (except maybe Omaha);

(c) have died of a massive heart attack.

No big loss in any case.





Harry Tuttle







 
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8630 alt.rush-limbaugh:9747 alt.politics.bush:13900
From: marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Marc Rassbach)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Date: 15 Nov 1992 20:26:00 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Department MSCS
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: studsys.mscs.mu.edu

In article <LARRY.92Nov13090936@peak.psl.nmsu.edu> larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way) writes:
>In article <1dr3l6INNmot@spool.mu.edu> marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Marc Rassbach) writes:
>      [...]
We've all seen it.......
>Sheesh, Marc. Live and let live.

He's free to waste his life however he wants.
(just as I am mine)

>Besides, *someone* has to record everything that Mighty Mouth says..

Doesn't Rush have someone else do that already?  For the longest time
he had a blurb on the show saying "Transcripts of this show are sent to
heads of state."  I don't see him giving ego boost up easy.  Or as
an income source.  


-- 
Marc Rassbach    marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu    If you take my advice, that
MS-DOS - it's not   marc@milestn.mil.wi.us    is your problem, not mine!
my problem!     If it was said on UseNet, it must be true.
   Unix - It's a nice place to live, but you don't want to visit there.
From: shapiro@cfsctc.enet.dec.com (Steve Shapiro)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Here Are The Undeniable Truths of Life
Date: 18 Nov 92 13:26:54 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation - Marlboro, MA
Organisation: SKS Computer Consulting, Inc.


In article <1992Nov18.002735.25446@news.stolaf.edu>,
kamilewi@lars.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Alex Kamilewicz) writes...

>Some would argue that sex is sometimes for the sharing of intimacy between
>two people who are very close, and not for procreation.  In effect, the idea
>of "making love" instead of "making babies."

Some would argue that this is what sets us apart from the rest of the animals
on this planet. We can CONSCIOUSLY engage in sex for EMOTIONAL reasons rather
than INSTINCT.

Regards,
Steve.

/*******************************************************************
* Steve Shapiro                 * All views and opinions expressed *
* SKS Computer Consulting, Inc. * are my own and are offered as-is *
********************************************************************
* Steve.Shapiro@f440.n101.z1.fidonet.org  BBS: (508) 664-6354 N81  *
*******************************************************************/
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.limbaugh
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 19:27:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov21.084622.2043@EE.Stanford.EDU> budd@playfair.Stanford.EDU (David Budd) writes:
>In article <grendel.722305682@camelot> grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:
>>In <1992Nov20.230532.24506@rchland.ibm.com> jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl) writes:
>>
>>>In article <1992Nov17.162705.24794@galileo.physics.arizona.edu>, krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:
>>>|> But he has already promised to screw up, by saying that he will remove
>>>|> the ban on gays in the military, etc.  I have not heard one of his 100
>>>|> day promises which is not a screw up, at least IMO, therefore, as far
>>>|> as I am concerned, HE ALREADY HAS SCREWED UP!!!
>>
>>>As you conservative, apple pie, gun-toting folks like to say:
>>
>>>"America.  Love it or Leave it!"
>>
>>>|>
>>>|> Ted (author and originator of the term `Zackane') Krueger
>>>|>
>>>|>
>>>|> --
>>>|> "We will bury you! We will bury you! We will bury you!"
>>>|>       - some ex-Soviet leader
>>>|>                    krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu
>>
>>>It was Kruschev.  And he meant economically bury us.
>>
>>Who knows what Nikita meant.  But I don't subscribe to this point of view. :)
>
>
>Actually, I believe that the translation was a bad one. A more correct trans-
>lation of what Khruschev said was "We will be at your funeral."
>But, you get the idea.
>
>"I said that Premier Kissof is a degenerate, atheist commie...."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From on of my all-time favorite films!

"You can't fight in here--this is the war room!"

Simon
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
From: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: usa
Date: 23 Nov 92 18:04:39 GMT

In <1992Nov21.060752.8174@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:

>In article <grendel.722305591@camelot> grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:
>>In <1992Nov17.162705.24794@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:
>>
>>>In article <1992Nov15.171641.28584@seq.uncwil.edu> session@seq.uncwil.edu (Zack C. Sessions) writes:
>>>>In article <1992Nov10.171300.11448@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>>>>>John Switzer               | Impeach Clinton!
>>>>>                           | Support the coup!
>>>>
>>>>I'd like to make a couple of comments in this thread concerning John's
>>>>current .sig.
>>>>
>>>>I really don't mind it very much, after all it is a free country and you
>>>>can say just about anything you want to. (It is illegal to threaten
>>>>the life of the president with mere words.) But I do think that is it
>>>>pretty stupid. Mainly since Clinton isn't president yet!! He is the
>>>>President-ELECT. You can't impeach someone who isn't the president yet!
>>>>GIVE THE GUY A CHANCE TO SCREW UP FIRST!!!
>>
>>>But he has already promised to screw up, by saying that he will remove 
>>>the ban on gays in the military, etc.  I have not heard one of his 100 
>>>day promises which is not a screw up, at least IMO, therefore, as far 
>>>as I am concerned, HE ALREADY HAS SCREWED UP!!!
>>
>>>Ted (author and originator of the term `Zackane') Krueger
>>
>><shocked gasp>!  You, good little conservative, actually _believe_ Slick
>>Willie will follow through on any of his promises?  How dare you?!  Everyone
>>knows he's just a waffler who tries to please everyone.

>You definitely got me with that one, except that I am anything but little!

Excuse me, good BIG conservative.

Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8797 alt.president.clinton:525