HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: wolfgang@wsrcc.com (Wolfgang S. Rupprecht)
Subject: Re: ZyXEL not hanging up on DTR off
Organization: W S Rupprecht Computer Consulting, Fremont CA
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 07:30:00 GMT

wbe@bbn.com (Winston Edmond) writes:
>I should clarify my previous post, just so to be clear on what "doesn't hang
>up" means.  The modem "hangs up" in the sense that it sends the appropriate
>(v.42?) "please hang up" message to the remote end, which dutifully hangs up,
>ending the telephone call.  However the modem remains "off hook" at the local
>end, with the CD (Carrier Detect), OH (Off hook), EC (Error correction), and
>SQ (signal quality) lights lit as if it still had a valid, working
>connection.  It doesn't go On Hook until I manually prod it to do so.

I've an even stranger problem w. 5.02.  I can dial out of the xyzel
just fine manually by connecting to it and typing:

	atdtw5551212

If I get tip to issue the *exact* same string the modem balks...  Both
times the computer-modem speed is the same 38400b/s.  Of course the
intercharacter delay is a bit more when I type by hand. ;-)

From the computer if I have it type:

	at\r\n
	<wait for OK>
	at\r\n
	<wait for OK>
	at\r\n
	<wait for OK>
	at\r\n
	<wait for OK> 

I don't get an ok every other time.  Strange.  I wonder if it is
dropping chars in command mode.

Anyone have any guesses?  I tried delays before the output routines,
just in case I was ansering too fast after the "OK", but that didn't
seem to help.

-wolfgang
-- 
Wolfgang Rupprecht    wolfgang@wsrcc.com (or) decwrl!wsrcc!wolfgang
Snail Mail:           39469 Gallaudet Drive, Fremont, CA 94538-4511
From: hp48sx@wupost.wustl.edu (HP48SX Archive Maintainer)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Supra: Silent answer, How ?
Date: 10 Nov 1992 18:35:17 -0600
Organization: Washington University in Saint Louis, MO USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: wuarchive.wustl.edu

Anybody who has got the silent answer working ?
The only docs I have about this is the rom upgrade notice that says
something about S0 - 0 and S0 = 0, so what does this mean ?
No matter what value S0 is, I can not get any response from the modem
when a fax is calling, and my answering machine is kicking in.
I get the 4 rings until the answering machine kicks in, and then no
further info is sent to my terminal.
Please help.

My modem also has lost contact to the outher world after 3 days of use
:-(  A phone connectesd to the phone connector works, bu the modem can
not get a dialtone or pick up the phone.  Good news is, that I could
send it to Supra in Germany, even though I bought it in the USA.
Guess it is the relay that went bad.

It was difficult to et through on the number listed in this group, and
when I got through, I got another number for tech support, where I had
no problems at all. So if you want it it is here:
'Supra Germany, tech support:   02232-22008
not sdure about the first zero. but it is like the other numbers listed,
just ending in 8.
-- 
Povl H. Pedersen             hp48sx@wuarchive.wustl.edu
HP48sx archive maintainer

All Opinions (C) Copyright the Intergalactic Thought Association
From: cpriest@pearl.tufts.edu (Curt Priest)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: FAQ, Archives, BOCA thread
Keywords: faq archive boca
Date: 5 Nov 92 23:38:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tufts University - Medford, MA
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Please E-mail me about where the FAQ is for this group and especially
want to catch up on some of the end of October discussion on the BOCA
14.4 discussion
Like to know where archived (FTP site and instructions) and if anyone
has the BOCA discussion thread they could just send me.
Thanks.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: ffujita@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Frank Fujita)
Subject: Re: Infotel modem
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 06:10:46 GMT

dpp@cray.com (Dave Peterschmidt) writes:
>Are there any other Infotel users out there?  We've heard from one (1)...

I'm a Infotel user.  Had it for 2 weeks.  I have been having problems
with extended downloads (> 1 meg), it seems that my mean download size
when downloading at full speed is about 2 megs.  I can't say that it is
the Infotel modem that is at fault, as I only have one connect site (the
university) and their 14.4k lines are new too.  

I wouldn't count my usage as a testimony for or against, Oh, one other
problem, it says that it (the fax software that comes with the infotel
144I) can read WP5.1 files, but when I sent the printer test file (what
else, I don't fax every day) only the most basic stuff translated
(underline, bold, etc) the graphics, foreign stuff, didn't translate.

Frank Fujita
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: RE: HELP! How to switch from data to voice ??
From: aleung@uwpg02.uwinnipeg.ca
Date: 9 NOV 92 21:04:25 CST
Organization: University of Winnipeg

I think Hayes didn't have this command. But you can ask your local phone company and check is there any command you can disable Call-waiting temporary.
From: kak@hico2.westmark.com (Kris A. Kugel)
Subject: How to get Supra 9600 to talk V.32 to Telebit Worldblazer?
Keywords: Supra Telebit Worldblazer PEP
Reply-To: kak@hico2.westmark.com
Organization: High Country Software
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 23:17:28 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Summary: get the Supra to talk to the Worldblazer at 9600 baud!


My brother out in California has a Supra 9600 modem.
I have a Worldblazer here.

When he calls my machine, the only way he's been able
to successfully connect is when he sets it to accept
2400 baud connections ONLY.  If he does not do that,
the Supra identifies something in the PEP answer sequence
as being something else, and puts out a solid tone until
it hangs up.

This is pretty annoying, especially as both these modems
should handle V.32/V.42bis, and we're therefore only at
a quarter of the throughput we should have.

Can anybody who has dealt with this problem give me some
suggestions?  I'd prefer a solution which affects
just the Supra, as I've got my uucp connections
running smoothly, and for various reasons I don't want
to turn the worldblazer answer sequence to answer PEP last.

Kris A. Kugel	908-842-2707
hico2!kak	kak@hico2.westmark.com
From: elliot@Wellspring.COM (Elliot H. Mednick)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: SUPRA ROM upgrade: Cure worse than disease?
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 20:37:07 GMT
Organization: Wellspring Solutions, Sutton, MA.
Reply-To: elliot@Wellspring.COM

I recently installed the new "H" ROMS into my Supra.  I more recently
took them out and put the old "C" ROMS back.  Has anyone else had to do
this?

After installing the new ROMs, I could no longer connect to FAX machines
that I had been able to connect to.  I also had to disable renogotiation,
since it was continually renogotiating and retraining, which defeats
the purpose of the new ROMs.  Renegotiation was particularly painful during
UUCP.

Too bad.  I would have liked to have used the adaptive answer feature.

Still can't connect to Zooms at 14.4k, but at 9600 it almost works
(sometimes it connects w/NMP5, sometimes w/v.42bis).  It connects to
Telebits anywhere at 14.4.

When the Telebits start offering FAX, I will be another Former Supra Owner.
--
Elliot H. Mednick                                        P.O. Box 150
Wellspring Solutions                                     Sutton, MA. 01590
elliot@Wellspring.com                                    +1 508 865 7271
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,misc.forsale,misc.forsale.computers
From: dp35@mc1adm.UWaterloo.ca (Greg Moore)
Subject: Re: commercial postings (was Re: Illegal Sales from Mark Margolis)
Followup-To: misc.forsale.computers.d
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:03:39 GMT

bprk_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Brian Park) writes:

>Okay, I've been following this thread for a while now too, and I'd like to
>know:  what *is* the group for commercial sales?  Everybody mentions it,
>but nobody says what it is.  How about it?

There are many groups.  They all begin with biz.*

Computer equipment belongs in: biz.comp.hardware
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: wkrause@kaa.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Wolfgang Krause)
Subject: Re: ZyXEL in Europe
Keywords: ZyXEL, import
Organization: Rechnerbetrieb Informatik  /  RWTH Aachen
Date: 13 Nov 92 09:56:21 GMT

roy@Mack.UiT.No (Roy Oestensen) writes:

>For the moment the ZyXEL modems are not yet approved for connection to the
>norwegian telecommunication network, and therefore impossible to get through
>customs.
You could still hook them up to a PBX (w/o outside lines), thus I doubt you
would run into trouble with customs for THAT reason.
Still they would like to charge you VAT and other tarifs...
I know of someone, who simply carried the thing thru customs in his suitcase
:-) and had no trouble at all. Oh yeah, in fact I have a ZyXEL, too.

>Does anybody out there know what European countries have approved the ZyXELs?
I dunno. They are not legal in Germany either, but noone seams to care,
thesedays. In Germay TELECOM-approved modems loose some features and have
certain (re-)dialing restrictions, plus they cost 3-4times (!) more.

>I know there is supposed to be a dealer i Germany, does any of you have their
>address and telephone number?
There are hundreads of them, but the less expensive dealers (ZyXEL 1496E for 
DM 600 - DM 700, incl. tax) are scarce.
I cant find any numbers at this time, but if you still looking, I will
mail/post some, as I find them. In this case drop me a line (ie. email me)

Wolfgang.

---
============================================================================
! WOLFGANG     !      E-MAIL: wkrause@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de       !
!      KRAUSE  !  SNAIL-MAIL: Langweilerstr.1, D-W5173 Aldenhoven, Germany !
!              !       Phone: (voice) ++49 2464 5227 (fax) ++49 2464 2263  !
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Millions of people spend there lives pondering over the question: is     !
! there life after death? They do not even consider the simpler and more   !
! relevant problem: is there life BEFORE death? There is.     George Mikes !
============================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: Dean.Roth <Dean.Roth@mixcom.mixcom.com>
Subject: Supra modem config advice
Organization: Milwaukee Internet Xchange BBS, Milwaukee, WI U.S.A.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 18:50:58 GMT


After much grief, I have discovered something about the
Supra V.32 and V.32bis modems. 

Configure the modem with %E0 not %E1.  With %E1 my Supra
modems (I have 3) would usually go into fatal retraining at any
speed over 2400. (The modem would retrain until the remote
system timed out and hungup.)

With %E0 my modems will now usually connect and stay connected at
speeds of 9600-14400.

Dean

--
NOTE: Your mileage may vary.
From: ACSWILEY@EKU.BITNET ("What, me worry?")
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: INFO-MODEMS Digest V92 #1508
Date: 6 Nov 92 20:00:29 GMT
Organization: The Internet

unsubscribe info-modems Bill Wiley



Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: spcberto@psyche.spc.uchicago.edu (Robert Osterlund)
Subject: RFI messing up modem communications--remedies?
Keywords: RFI, noise
Organization: University of Chicago, SSPPCC
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 16:21:58 GMT


Last weekend, we moved into a new home close by a local radio station.  I
had expected RFI to degrade our television reception, but I was aghast to
discover that it is affecting our phones as well.  The phone lines are
quite noisy, and if you listen you can clearly make out the voices and
music of the radio station's broadcast.  Some times are worse than others.
The phone company says there is nothing it can do.

Needless to say, this is having a bad effect on my modem communications.
It is hard to establish connections, and several times I have lost
connection in mid session.  Text scrolls across the screen in fits and
starts as data is transmitted and retransmitted through the line noise.
Several file transfers have bombed out.

I suppose dropping my baud rate will help (ugh!), but is there anything
else I can try?  Specifically:

--hardware fixes?  (filters and other gizmos)
--modem settings?  (I have an Intel 2400B MNP modem)
--telecommunications software?
--file transfer protocols especially effective dealing with line noise
  and allowing resumption of failed transfers?

Some additional information:  We have moved into the first floor of an
older two-flat.  The modem, an Intel 2400B MNP, hooks up via regular
twisted-pair cable, about six feet in length, to a modular phone jack.
The computer equipment is properly grounded.

The situation is not so bad that I can't read news, answer e-mail,
etc. (although sometimes even these activities are iffy), but I expect
downloading may well be effectively impossible.  Can anyone offer any
advice?  (Other than moving again or just forgetting the whole thing,
I mean.)

Bob Osterlund
berto@clio.spc.uchicago.edu
SSPPCC--University of Chicago
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Telebit Worldblazer + Fax ??
Summary: Soon
Date: 6 Nov 92 06:27:53 GMT
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)

In article <k78mTB1w165w@dadstoy.uucp> zatar@dadstoy.uucp (Terry Stockdale) writes:
>Once upon a time, about 4 months ago or so, there was a cryptic post about
>an upgrade coming this fall for the Worldblazer to incorporate Fax support.
>
>Does anyone have any new scoop on this?  I'd love to be able to get faxes 
>on my Worldblazer.  Since I'm running DOS (actually DRDOS 6.0), I'm stuck
>with COM1 (my mouse) and COM2 (my Worldblazer, thru a NS16550AFN chip).
>

It's being worked on.  Should be soon, though I'm afraid I can't be
more detailed than that.


-- 
 .------------------------------------------------------------------.
 |  Greg Andrews   |       UUCP: {amdahl,claris}!netcom!gerg        |
 |                 |   Internet: gerg@netcom.COM                    |
 `------------------------------------------------------------------'
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: rjn@FC.HP.COM (Bob Niland)
Subject: Re: UART 16550 chip compatibles?
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 20:36:12 GMT
Reply-To: rjn@FC.HP.COM
Organization: Hewlett-Packard/WSY Ft.Collins,CO,USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.8 PL6]

Jaye Mathisen (osyjm@cs.montana.edu) wrote:

> Don't trust msd...  It thinks my 16550 is an 8250 on a dec 386 sx...
> (plug in serial card).

If msd is confused, your serial driver and datacomm software may be as well,
and may not enable the 16-byte FIFO and/or hardware flow control.

Regards,                                              Hewlett-Packard
Bob Niland      Internet: rjn@FC.HP.COM               3404 East Harmony Road
                CompuServe:  71044,2124               Ft Collins CO 80525-9599

This article represents only the opinion[s] of its author, and is not an
official or unofficial position of, or statement by, the Hewlett-Packard
Company.  The text is provided for informational purposes only.  It is
supplied without warranty of any kind.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: dnb@meshugge.media.mit.edu (David N. Blank-Edelman)
Subject: Re: ZyXEL sometimes suddenly hangs up
Organization: M.I.T. Media Laboratory
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 21:03:28 GMT

> Sometimes my ZyXEL (V4.09) just hangs up without any obvious reason.

Call waiting is a possibility, but I'll bet this is the problem: using
a mac?  If so, mac hardware handshaking cables tie DTR & RTS. When
your computer says "whoa, don't send me anything for a moment" (like
when you so something under the Finder), it lowers DTR.  Most modems
(the ZyXEL included) take a drop in DTR to mean disconnect.  

The way I fix this is to send &D0 as part of my dialing string
(AT&D0DT<number>) which tells the modem to ignore DTR transitions.

        Peace,
           dNb

--

 David N. Blank-Edelman              o/    \  /    \ /     /      \o   
 M.I.T. Media Laboratory            /#      ##o     #     o##      #\
 E15-473F, (617) 253-2169           / \    /  \    /o\    / |\    / \
From: rlcarr@animato.network23.com (Rich Carreiro)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Illegal Sales from Mark Margolis
Distribution: world
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 1.16f (10.17.92) by Mike Schwartz & Michael B. Smith
Date: 9 Nov 92 19:10:45 EDT
Organization: The Other Side of Life

In article <30073@nntp_server.ems.cdc.com> ghart@ems.cdc.com (Geoffrey Hart) writes:
> |> In article <1d20omINNlqd@flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU> valhert@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (valhert) writes:
> |>Hi,
> |>
> |>I have use the misc.forsale often and I keep seeing Mark
> |>Margolis (fnox@cornell) selling modems and the such.
> |>I am sorry, but when a person is selling something new
> |>and willing to beat any price... I call that commercial
> |>sales!  
> |>
> |>I always believe that the rule was not to have commerrcial
> |>sales on the usenet.  How can we prevent this illegal 
> |>activity from continuing?  This guy is using the guise of
> |>a college student to legitatize this sales.
> 
> Why don't you find something useful to do.  Is this activity somehow
> hurting you?  I think it's a very helpful thing, but then I'm a consumer
> (as are the majority).
> 
> The rules for commercial activity on the Internet are not well enforced in
> other areas.  I think this activity by Margolis, even if it is commercial
> in nature, is not worth the time you have spent to try and stop it.

Yes, it is hurtful.  This Margolis guy is getting free advertising at
taxpayer expense.  As a taxpayer, I do not appreciate this.  Also,
commercial stuff going over the NSF backbone is *illegal*.
Finally, as a privately run site, I do not appreciate paying for transmission
time for blatantly commercial postings.  Why can't this Margolis guy  play a
fair game and advertise properly and legally, hmm?

> Go clean up a park or something.

Buzz off, schmuck.

-- 
Rich Carreiro                                  Home: (401)841-8514
rlcarr@animato.network23.com
uunet.uu.net!animato!rlcarr
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: kenney@stein.u.washington.edu (Michael Kenney)
Subject: Cylink radio modems
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 23:55:54 GMT


Has anyone out there had any experience with Cylink radio modems?  We
are considering using them on an oceanographic experiment early next year
and would like to hear from people who have used them.  Specifically,
what kind of performance have you gotten out of them.

Please respond by e-mail.

----
Mike Kenney
UW Applied Physics Lab
mikek@apl.washington.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: RE: CompuCom
From: aleung@uwpg02.uwinnipeg.ca
Date: 9 NOV 92 21:08:37 CST
Organization: University of Winnipeg

As I know CompuCom is no longer aviliable.
From: dennis_c@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Discovery 2400C as a Fax
Date: 10 Nov 1992 21:27:52 GMT
Organization: Wellington City Council (Public Access), Wgtn, Nz
Reply-To: dennis_c@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

Does anyone have any experience of using the Datatronics Discovery 2400C
modem for sending faxes?

The documentation says it is possible, but gives no details of how.

I tried using some faxmodem software called QL2FAX, but it refused to
acknowledge that the 2400C even existed.

Any ideas?

Chris Dennis                             dennis_c@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Wellington, New Zealand
From: ged@phantom.cs.hut.fi (Camillo S{rs)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: SupraFax v32bis and BUSY tone
Date: 5 Nov 92 18:15:22 GMT
Reply-To: Camillo.Sars@hut.fi
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, CS lab

In <KONTIO.92Nov5172332@zelda.hut.fi> kontio@niksula.hut.fi (Ari J Kontiainen) writes:

>In article <JESPER.92Nov4210330@elixir.elixir.e.kth.se> jesper@elixir.e.kth.se (Jesper Karlsson) writes:

>   I got the same sympthoms when I "upgraded" my modem from 1.2C to 1.2H. The
>   BUSY detect used to work in the old ROM's, so I guess it's a feature. 8^)

>I really hope, that it is a feature, because I want the better busy 
>detection back (on Finnish telephone lines)!  

Couldn't agree more. With the C ROMs I could get through to HUT quite
easily, as the digital lines provide "instant" redial, i.e. no analog
CRR-CRRR-CRRR in between. The BUSY reply came up almost instantly, so
my redialer ended up dialling the two series in VERY rapid succession.

Now, with the H ROMs, the delay before BUSY detection is very long.
Sometimes the central even stops sounding the busy sound -> NO CARRIER
after almost a minute of waiting. :(

--
ged@hut.fi                   Amiga 500 //
ged@niksula.cs.hut.fi             2.04// Aim for the impossible and you
Department of Computer Science    \\ //   will achieve the improbable.
Helsinki University of Technology  \X/     --- Camillo S{rs
From: lee@hsh.com (Lee Havemann)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: NeXT/Supra modem performance question
Date: 9 Nov 92 20:12:08 GMT
 <1992Nov7.180909.9732@augustana.ab.ca> <1992Nov9.072120.17438@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>
Organization: HSH Associates

In article <1992Nov9.072120.17438@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>, swiet@syzygy.cs.jhu.edu (Alexander Swietlicki) writes:
> 	Set win 7 caused packet length to drop from the max of 9024 to
> 1289.  This caused throughput to drop even more.  On a certain file, it
> was about 900cps at a packet length of 9024, and about 600cps with set
> win 7.  With sz, it was about 1500cps. (v.32bis/v.42bis)
> 	All I know is that with zmodem, the RD light on my modem is on
> continuously until the end of the file or an error.  With xmodem and
> kermit, every so often (depending on packet length), the RD light goes
> off, and the SD light goes on briefly.  This "turn-around" is what's
> killing the throughput.  If sliding-windows streams the transfer as sz
> does, then how do you enable it?  Because set win 7 didn't for me.  It
> just shortened the time between the (agonizingly slow) pauses.
> 	I'm running C-Kermit 5A-170 locally, and 4E-070 is installed on
> the remote machine.  Are these versions too outdated?
> 
> 	Alex

We have found that a set window 3, set block 2  give us the best 
transmission speed. It as almost as fast as zmodem.
(We use 5A(185) BETA-7, so you might want to get a newer version :-)


-- 

 Lee Havemann, Sys_op       HSH Associates          (201) 838-3330 
 Internet: lee@hsh.com    Compuserve: 70410,3507    AOL: HSH Assoc
 "Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of anyone else, 
  including myself."                     
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:16529 biz.comp.telebit:1014
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
Subject: Re: telebit trailblazer
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 92 17:37:41 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

jms@informix.com (Jack Stephens) writes:

> I finally got my WB a week or so ago, and have things configured so
> that all the nice little lights light after an interminable handshake
> sequence, but WB <--> WB I'm only seeing ~900 CPS.
> 
> The far end is a sun, I'm running a 486 with nothing else going on and the
> serial port locked at 38.4 but the send/recieve lights are only cycling
> at ~10 Hz.
> 
> Obviously, I've missed something among the myriad of registers.

   Is it possible that you've overlooked S111=30?

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
       You're still young if your wallet is exhausted before you are.
Organization: Queen's University at Kingston
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 16:14:58 EDT
From: <0407658@QUCDN.QueensU.CA>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Problem setting Hayes Optima 144

Hello

I am having problems setting up my new Hayes Optima 144.  I am able
to make this connection at 9600 using the software YTERM 3.2, which
is 3270 terminal emulation software.  However, when trying to use my
old PC-TALK or Hayes Smartcom EZ, shortly after what appears to be a
successful connection, I get a  disconnect!  Also when trying to make a
connection at any baud rate other than 9600, I can not connect at all.
I thought the Optima would automatically adjust to the correct baud rate.
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?  I cannot even connect to
Hayes Online!
Thanks

Don - Perplexed but not yet beaten in Canada!



Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems