HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: goldberg@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Mark Goldberg)
Newsgroups: rec.video,rec.video.production
Subject: Super-8 filmmaking gear now sold
Date: 30 Jul 92 14:45:55 GMT
Reply-To: goldberg@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Mark Goldberg)
Followup-To: rec.video
Distribution: usa
Organization: Naval Surface Warfare Center, Annapolis, MD

Thanks for the many responses.  It was shipped to a buyer yesterday.
I was truly surprised at the number of responses and the level of interest
in super-8 filmmaking!

   /|/| /||)|/  /~ /\| |\|)[~|)/~   |   Everyone's entitled to MY opinion.
  / | |/ ||\|\  \_|\/|_|/|)[_|\\_|  |      goldberg@oasys.dt.navy.mil
========Imagination is more important than knowledge. - Albert Einstein=======
From: mapy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: rec.video
Subject: HELP bring a mother's dream come true
Date: 24 Jul 92 22:22:38 EDT
Summary: international formats]
Reply-To: mapy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Followup-To: poster
Distribution: rec
Organization: Cornell University

Hi Video experts,

	I am an outsider to the jungle of formats so please forgive the 
trivial question. The thing is that at last I can fulfill my mother's old
desire of having a camcorder (!). She lives in Brazil and the TV system 
there is PAL-M. I suppose I shoul by a PAL camcorder, OK. Now, is there 
such a thing as a PAL-M camcorder or only PAL. Besides, what is the current
choice, 8 mm or VHS?

			Thank you all for the help.

		Marcos Piani


Newsgroups: rec.video
From: Vince@alchemy.tn.cornell.edu (Vince Koh Kia Keng)
Subject: Re: $975 for a TR81?
Organization: Alchemy International
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 14:53:32 GMT

In article <Brz9tJ.Ap7@acsu.buffalo.edu> yzhang@acsu.buffalo.edu (Yinong Zhang) writes:
>Hi,
>
>     I plan to buy a camcorder next month. Which one to buy? TR81 or a cheaper
>TR71? I am a still photographer and not very interested in video. Is  Hi-8
>format much better than the non Hi-8? I mean the picture quality on an ordinary
>TV. I got a offer from New York Photographic Equipment International, a dealer
>selling photo equip to overseas, of $975 including shiping cost and tax for
>TR81. Is this a good price? I know the company well and it is very reliable.
>
>         Thank you.
>
>Chang

	$975 for a SONY TR81 with warranty is a good price.  
	Yes, even on an ordinary NTSC TV, Hi-8 video does make a difference.
When I compared my old pictures from my SONY CCD-F33 and my new TR101, I
was shocked to find pictures so detailed and accurate!  I wonder how it
would look if I had an S-Video TV to watch it on.

-Vince

Newsgroups: rec.video
From: aaronb@suhana.analog.ingr.com (Aaron B.)
Subject: WANTED:  Dead VCR
Keywords: Broken VCR
Reply-To: aaronb@suhana.analog.ingr.com
Organization: Home Office Enterprise
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 01:26:29 GMT

Hi Netters:

I need a VHF tuner for my project.  Someone suggested me salvaging it
from a broken VCR.  Anybody that have such a thing or know of how to
get them please respond by e-mail.  Any other suggestions are welcome too.

Thanks in advanced.

Aaron B
aaronb@suhana.analog.ingr.com
Newsgroups: rec.video,comp.multimedia
From: leo@zelator.in-berlin.de (Stefan Hartmann)
Subject: Re: PC Genlock/24bit Capture Suggestions
Organization: Puplic-Access-Xenix-System
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 92 09:35:12 GMT

In <1992Jul20.124954.19011@capitol.com> hafey@capitol.com (Rob Hafey) writes:

>I am interested in doing some video titling and effects and also some camera
>capture.  I was interested in some suggestions and experiences that people
>have had with some of the equipment and software available for the PC.  
>Currenlty I have a SONY CCD-701 camera (Hi-8) and a Clone 386-33mhz machine.  

>Thanks, Rob

>-- 
> Rob Hafey
> Capitol Disc Interactive (CD-I) 
> 2121 Wisconsin Ave NW, Washington D.C. 20007   (202)625-0141 
> hafey@capitol.com

Hi ,
for Genlock reason I would say, there is no better Price/quality
performance board available, than the GENOA M2100 Genlock board.

It is around 350 US$ and can do titling with 640x480x256 SVGA
resolution.

A Video Titler comes free with it !

The M2100 is the NTSC version. I over here have the M2150 PAL version
and it worked very good for me !

BTW, it has no frame-grabber on board !

Best regards Stefan Hartmann.
email to: leo@zelator.in-berlin.de

-- 
 
*************************************************************
*  Stefan Hartmann       This is how to contact me:         *
*  EMAIL: leo@zelator.in-berlin.de                          *
*  Phone : ++ 49 30 344 23 66      FAX : ++ 49 30 344 92 79 *
*************************************************************
From: mfolivo@sactoh0.sac.ca.us (Mark Newton-John)
Newsgroups: rec.video
Subject: Sony Beta format
Keywords: specs
Date: 30 Jul 92 09:58:32 GMT
Organization: Sacramento Public Access Unix

I usually research the subject before I post, but I can't find the
right materials for it, so I'll proceed anyway.

About the Beta format, there is some confusion from some about what
was SHB Beta, ED-Beta, SuperBeta, and just plain Beta. (I'll leave
out Betacam and Betacam SP) I can't remember the exact term, so
don't flame me...

There were improvements to the Beta format since it's introduction
and hence, many "flavors", as I'll call them. The improvements were
to the picture quality by moving the carrier frequency (right
term?) higher and higher to acheive better horizontal line
resolutions. To further confuse the issue, Japanese Betamaxes had
different names for the enhancements.

I believe the carrier frequency for Beta was at 4.7 MHz (also VHS)
that gave the 220~ line resolution.

SuperBeta increased this to 5.6 MHz to get 280~300 lines.
In Japan I believe this was called HiBand Beta.

Super HiBand Beta increased this to 6.0 MHz for around the 330~
line range. I think the Japanese called this HiBand Beta 6.0 MHz.
This was found only in high-end Betamaxes, like the SL-HF900 and
SL-HF1000. It is sold now in the "dream machine" SL-HF2100.

These Beta formats use the standard oxide tapes.

After the introduction of S-VHS, that had better line resolutions
than SHB Beta, Sony developed ED-Beta, Extended Definition Beta as
a "Prosumer" format. This format used metal tapes (S-VHS uses oxide
tapes, don't let anyone con you otherwise- I think M-II uses metal
tapes) ED-Beta pushed the carrier frequeny to 9 MHz, to give 500
lines of resolution, to give HDTV (at the time- MUSE?) quality. I
am not sure about Japan, but in the US, the demand for ED-Beta has
fallen off. I do not think Sony makes the ED-Beta machines
available anymore. Sony did make four models for the Japanese
market as opposed to the two they released here.

ED-Beta is not downward compatible, in fact, ED-Beta tapes will not
work in Betamaxes. If they did, they'd eat the heads. ED-Beta
machines will play and record in SuperBeta, they did not have SHB
Beta. The ED-V7500 only recorded BII and BIII, I can't remember if
the ED-V9500 recorded BIs. This was for standard Beta. For ED-Beta,
the only speeds were BII and BIII.

The EDC-55 videocamera (this was NOT a mere camcorder) only used
ED-Beta tapes, and recorded BII and BIII. It used a C-mount Tamron
10-105mm lens (as I remember), had a 2 CCD camera section, and was
modular in design. Was there a 3 CCD module available?

To summarize, there is Beta, SuperBeta, Super HiBand Beta, and
ED-Beta.

Hope this clears things up a little. There may be some minor
inaccuracies, Bill Vermillion can correct me.


-- 
#############################################################
# Scaramento Public Access UNIX     sactoh0.SAC.CA.US       #  
#  (916) 649-0161, 722-6516 & 722-5068    E-Mail & USENET   #
################## default .signature file ##################
Newsgroups: rec.video
From: wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu (William R. Cruce)
Subject: Re: LD Clubs : Quality?
Organization: Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 14:55:08 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.003533.5525@ctr.columbia.edu> es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) writes:
>In article <5011@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> ranck@joesbar.cc.vt.edu (Wm. L. Ranck) writes:
>>When I asked them to put me on positive response the woman on the 
>>phone said she couldn't do it....
>>
>	Columbia House was willing to do it for me when it came
>to the Videotape club. (I assume you mean no default to Yes on
>the director's selection) I'm surprised they refused. I guess
>they aren't willing to do it for laserdiscs.

No, several people on the net have reported being put on positive response
for LDs as well (myself included).  I don't know why Wm. Ranc had trouble
with them.  Maybe he encountered a cranky employee :-)


-- 
                 "So many windows, So little time"

Bill Cruce, N.E. Ohio Univ. Coll. of Medicine, Box 95, Rootstown, OH 44272
VOICE: 216-325-2511,  FAX: 216-325-0522,  INTERNET: wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.video
Subject: Re: Does "video stablizer" work?
Date: 26 Jul 92 08:18:44 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout

In article <1992Jul24.072232.11398@microsoft.com> peterwu@microsoft.com (Peter Wu) writes:
<Many mail order places advertise a $50 box to remove copy protection from
<video tapes (the kind that goes dark and bright and dark ...).
<
<Does anyone know what's in the box and how well it works?
<If it's just a zener diode or something equally simple, I'd rather not
<pay $50 for it.

I can guarentee that a simple zener diode won't do it.  $50 is a decent price.
-- 
      harvard\     att!nicmad\          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
From: Mike_Quigley@mindlink.bc.ca (Mike Quigley)
Newsgroups: rec.video
Subject: Attention Canucks!
Date: 30 Jul 92 14:35:48 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: world

I just got a catalogue from some place in Mississauga called Laserland, the
first Canadian store I've encountered that will do mail order for laser disks.
Just wondering if anyone else has dealt with these people and how the service
is. Their prices on some things like MGM and Warner Bros. aren't bad, when you
take into consideration the duty, GST, postage and handling charges that are
added on to the prices of disks ordered from the States. Other labels you have
to be more careful about ... like $192.99 for the CAV Criterion West Side
Story? Get serious!
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"TV dinner by the pool -- I'm so glad I finished school." -- Frank Zappa
From: mike@BRL.MIL (Mike Muuss)
Newsgroups: rec.video
Subject: Re: NSTC --- What does it mean and where to get specs
Date: 21 Jul 92 23:08:13 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Internet


William York writes:

> I am looking for a tech source book explaining the NSTC stuff.

I recommend:

"Television Engineering Handbook", K. Blair Benson, ed.
ISBN 0-07-004779-0
Library of Congress Catalog number TK6642.T437 (for library access).

See in particular chapters 13 (receivers), 15 (video tape recording),
and 18 (digital television).

	Best,
	 -Mike
Xref: sparky rec.video:9631 rec.video.satellite:3809 rec.video.production:1154
From: jra@psycho.fidonet.org (Jay Ashworth)
Newsgroups: rec.video
Subject: Re: Compression artifacts in NBC Olympic coverage
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 19:41:20 EDT
Organization: Psycho: The Usenet<->Fidonet Gateway of St. Pete Florida

>>>Finally, if you have a tape of the afternoon coverage, take
>>>a look and try to confirm that I'm not off my rocker.
>
>I just watched some of the floor exercises, and yes, there is certainly
>something visible around fast moving objects that may be compression 
>artifacts.  So you're not completely off your rocker. :)

 DstA> But is it really compression?  It looks to me more like they're using
 DstA> some ridiculously high shutter speeds to kill the motion blur for their
 DstA> slow-mo replays, which have been unusually solid.

Kill two birds with one stone...

The Olympic coverage is being mastered in PAL, and standards converted, by (I think) Snell & Wilcox equipment.  I'm sure they'll be heartbroken to know artifacts are getting out, since they spent about $20k+ per feed to avoid it....

The slow-mo is very likely being done on a Sony Super-Slo-Mo, which is a modified 1" type C deck that records at 180 fields/second.

Cheers,
-- jra

--  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jay R. Ashworth                                 Internet: jra@pro-scat.cts.com
Ashworth & Associates                                   jra@psycho.fidonet.org
An Interdisciplinary Consultancy                 UUCP: ...!uunet!tct!acorn!jra
  in Advanced Technology                           Long Lines: +1 813 449 UNIX
Note:psycho is a free gateway between Usenet & Fidonet. For info write root.
Newsgroups: rec.video
From: otto@tukki.jyu.fi (Otto J. Makela)
Subject: Cheap source for Panasonic NV-W1 in NY,NY ?
Organization: The Crimson Permanent Assurance Company
Distribution: rec
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1992 00:41:52 GMT

My mother will be passing thru New York, NY in October.  What kind
of prices does one have to pay for a Panasonic NV-W1 over there ?
I was thinking of having my sister (who's a resident) pick one up
and give it to my mom for bringing over.

For comparison, the recommended price for it over here is >$3000
and the ultimate-best deal I could get for it is something like $2500.
-- 
   /* * * Otto J. Makela <otto@jyu.fi> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */
  /* Phone: +358 41 613 847, BBS: +358 41 211 562 (V.32bis/USR-HST,24h/d) */
 /* Mail: Kauppakatu 1B18/SF-40100 Jyvaskyla/Finland, ICBM: 62.14N25.44E */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */
Newsgroups: rec.video
From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Subject: Power Antenna
Organization: Columbia U., New York City
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 21:44:33 GMT
X-Posted-From: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu


	There is a product being advertised on TV as the power
antenna, which claims to give amazing reception by using the
wiring in your house as the antenna. It plugs into the wall and
from there into your TV.

	$20.

	Any thoughts on whether this is believable?
	-- Ethan


Newsgroups: rec.video
From: MDuPree@world.std.com (Micky DuPree)
Subject: Is there a safe rewinder?
Summary: All my rewinders chew up my tapes!
Keywords: rewinder, Ambico, Solidex, Quantum International
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 12:44:32 GMT

Has anyone ever come across a rewinder that is truly safe to use with
tapes?

My first set of rewinders: Ambico V-0759.
    I bought one and it snapped the leaders off my tapes, so I took it
back to the store and got a replacement under the warranty.  The
replacement snapped leaders off, too, so the store told me to ship it
back to the manufacturer.  They returned it supposedly repaired, but it
still snapped leaders.

My second set of rewinders: Solidex 6000XT.
    It snapped leaders too, so I shipped it back to the manufacturer
under the warranty.  They sent back a replacement, but it snapped
leaders off, too.

My third set of rewinders: Quantum International VHP 1010.
    This one sounded like a good idea, at least on paper: it has an
infrared sensor to stop the tape before it reaches the very end.  It
worked well for about a month, but then it started twisting tapes off
the spool.  It didn't snap the tapes clean off, but it did damage the
oxide and sometimes tear the tape as well.  I sent it back to the
manufacturer under warranty.  They sent back a replacement that
performed almost identically: it worked well for about a month, but then
it started twisting tapes.

I'm looking for a rewinder (preferably two-way) that won't damage tapes.
Alternatively, does anyone know of a scheme that would let me safely use
the rewinders I have?  Someone once told me there was a way to use a
transformer to slow the mechanism down.  Someone else told me that for
that purpose I should use a resistor.

I'd even entertain a theory that there's something screwy about my line
current.

*sigh*  The Quantum was good initially.  It went from one end of a T-120
to the other in almost 2 minutes flat with no damage.

I'd appreciate any help or tips.

-Micky

Newsgroups: rec.video
From: osyjm@cs.montana.edu (Jaye Mathisen)
Subject: Re: Need advice on JVC VCRs
Organization: CS
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 01:54:47 GMT

In article <l7e75gINNldg@spim.mips.com> ccheng@mips.com writes:
>I am considering purchasing the JVC HR4700 S-VHS VCR. One netter suggests me NOT to buy the
>JVC VCRs because they give poor sound quality and the tape transport mechanism can easily malfunction.
>
>He said he got this information from the net. Unfortunately, he had just deleted those messages. So if you 
>have any  advice on this VCR or happen to have saved these messages, would you please give me a email
>of them?

I was a die-hard JVC fan, until I bought a Mitsubishi.

I had an HRS8000U JVC, thought it was great.

I just popped for a U82 from Mits, it's incredible.  Absolutely no-noise
scans, jog-shuttle that works flawlessly.  More inputs and outputs that
you can shake a stick at.  Excellent sound.  Great editing.

Get a Mits, don't even waste time on JVC.
-- 
 Jaye Mathisen, COE Systems Manager                (406) 994-4780
 410 Roberts Hall,Dept. of Computer Science
 Montana State University,Bozeman MT 59717	osyjm@cs.montana.edu
Newsgroups: rec.video
From: m21757@mitre.org (G)
Subject: Surge Protectors and Antennae
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 16:06:10 GMT

Hi,  I'm an acknowledged neophyte....  My questions are do you really need 
those $130 surge protectors (Panamax) for your TV (I have a 27EXR25) or 
are the regular Curtis, Kensington etc. type ok?

Also if you don't have access to cable what type of indoor antennaes are 
pretty good?

Thanks for the information!


Newsgroups: rec.video
From: freedmanm@woods.ulowell.edu
Subject: Re: Yamaha DSP-E200
Organization: University of Lowell
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 01:06:54 GMT

In article <2A6B0BF1.11753@noiro.acs.uci.edu>, harvey@cafws1.eng.uci.edu (Harvey Chen) writes:
> 
> 	I was wondering if the DSP-E200 Pro-logic processor decodes in the
> digital domain or not.  Also how does this model differ from the Yamaha
> DSP-E300?  What is Enhanced Pro-logic anyway?  It seems like only Yamaha
> processors has this.  Thanks!
> 


The reason that Yamaha is the only one that has this is because they are the
only one that are licensed by dolby to do it because they invented it with
dolby... (Run on sentence).. REad my posting on in rec.audio about the Yamaha
DSP a1000... the E300 is the same system without main channel amplification...
It is the BALLS!!!!
				Mike
From: rpartha@cadev6.intel.com (Rajan Parthasarathy ~)
Newsgroups: rec.video
Subject: info on camcorder purchase : is there a FAQ ??
Date: 29 Jul 92 18:08:11 GMT
Reply-To: rpartha@inews.UUCP ()
Distribution: usa
Organization: Intel Corp., Design Technology Group, Santa Clara, CA

Netters,

is there a FAQ on camcorder purchase/maintenance that someone could
email to me ?  i am looking to purchase one in the $ 700-800 range.


regards,

rajan


 ____________________________________________________________________________
|                                                                            |
|Rajan Parthasarathy                               Intel Corp, Design Tech.  |
|rpartha@scdt.intel.com                            2880 North Western Pkwy,  |
|Tel:408-765-4547                                  Santa Clara, CA 95051     |
|Fax:408-765-5719                                  Mail Stop: Sc3-36         |
|____________________________________________________________________________|
Newsgroups: rec.video
From: gc3@jcnpc.cmhnet.org (George Cifrancis)
Subject: Re: Sony EXR service mode -- success!
Organization: Homebrew Virtual Reality Labs
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 05:53:57 GMT

daver@felix.filenet.com (daver@felix.filenet.com) writes:
: In rec.video, jonke@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov (Stephen Jonke) writes:
:
: > Pretty neat -- definitely glad I bought an EXR.  My question is,
: > why is the standard safe area so much smaller then the actual image area???
:
: Because as TV sets age, the picture gets smaller, and the maker doesn't want
: you to see the beam landing zone or raster edge during the normal life of
: the set.  This shrinkage was much more severe in the 50s and 60s when the
: the anode power supply was tube-based, vendors seem to be adjusting in
: generous overscan out of habit even on modern sets.

How doyou access the service mode on a EXR??  I have a
SONY KV-27EXR15.

George Cifrancis
gc3@jcnpc.cmhnet.org
From: hess@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com (Kevin Hess)
Newsgroups: rec.video
Subject: Re: Does "video stablizer" work?
Date: 29 Jul 92 20:28:37 GMT
Organization: Hewlett Packard - Boise, ID

In article <1992Jul24.072232.11398@microsoft.com> peterwu@microsoft.com (Peter Wu) writes:
<Many mail order places advertise a $50 box to remove copy protection from
<video tapes (the kind that goes dark and bright and dark ...).
<
<Does anyone know what's in the box and how well it works?
<If it's just a zener diode or something equally simple, I'd rather not
<pay $50 for it.

I can guarentee that a simple zener diode won't do it.  $50 is a decent price.
-- 
      harvard\     att!nicmad\          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
----------

I purchased on of these boxes as a kit, and assembled it myself (cost was
$39.00 two years ago).  basically, there are a couple of ICs, one digital
and one analog.  The digital IC is used to make a state machine which looks
for the sync signal.  At several points after the sync signal, the state
machine causes the analog IC (which the video signal passes through) to drop
the voltage to 0V.  

This in effect removes to injected noise which make Macrovision screw up
the AGC circuits, causing the picture to be less than pretty.

I have never tried copying from one tape to another (that would be unlawful;
or would it?  What about time shift viewing of rented movies?), but it does
make a difference when watching a tape on our TV set.

If you want one, buy it.  You're not getting ripped off.  Parts alone 
looked to be worth $12 to $15.

You might also check back issues of Radio-Electronics.  That was where I
first saw them described in an article, and where I subsequently ordered the
kit from

-Kevin

This is not an official statement of The Hewlett-Packard Company. No war-
ranty is expressed or implied. The information included herein is not to be
construed as a committment on HP's part. 

"There can be only one!" - Conner McCloud of the clan McCloud
"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or 
numbered - I am not a number, I am a free man!" - Number 6

Kevin C. Hess	 		The Hewlett-Packard Company
Network Printer Division	11311 Chinden Boulevard
Mail Stop 524			Boise, Idaho  83714-0015  USA
hess@hpbs917.boi.hp.com		(208) 323-3384
From: killeen@spcvxb.spc.edu (Jeff Killeen)
Newsgroups: rec.video
Subject: Re: Building Hi8 Based System
Date: 28 Jul 92 14:14:40 GMT
Organization: SPC Community Access System

In article <Bs2pxt.6os@ecf.toronto.edu>, bajaj@ecf.toronto.edu (BAJAJ PANKAJ) writes:
> 
> I will highly appreciate if some one could provide any comparative article
> either saved on the net or published in some video/photography magazine on
> building personal Hi8 based sytem, complete with VCR and editor. I had posted
> similar question few weeks ago but didn't get a single reply.

The short answer for consumer based systems is...

(All Sony Model numbers)

TR101/TR81/V701/V801 for the Camcorder

RME700 for the edit controller

SLV-R5/EVS-900/EVS-3000 for the deck - The R5 is S-VHS and the EV's are Hi8mm

My setup is...

	TR101 <---> RME300 <---> SLV-R5
Newsgroups: rec.video