From: khaleq@brahms.udel.edu (Mohame Khalequzzaman)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.indian
Subject: Re: March Attemp on Ayodhya from Bangladesh
Date: 8 Jan 93 04:26:33 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

[Deepak's letter to me is deleted by Raman]

In article <1iicqkINNjpa@bigboote.WPI.EDU> rajesh@juniper (Rajesh Raman) writes:
>Mohame Khalequzzaman (khaleq@brahms.udel.edu) wrote:
>
>: I am shocked, puzzled, stunned, and furious.  The above posting sent a shiver
>: through my bones, if not through my brain.  I took a deep breath closing my eyesas I tried to come up with sensible reply.  I have decided not to make any

[deleted by khaleq]
>
>Dear Khaliq,
>
>	I don't see how making comments would you bring you down to
>	anyone else's level. You presume that he is below your level.

I don't know if you understood the meaning of Deepak's posting.  It certainly
doesn't look like that you understood the Bengali portion of the letter written
using English scripts.  If you did, I don't see how you could still make the above comments.  In order to understand our "level" you have to understand what is
said by either of us.  Unfortunately, you have deleted Deepak's part.  Besides, almost all postings that followed Deepak's letter to me renounced him for his
vulgar words.  Deepak himself apologized to me for his posting, and I replied tohis personal letter to me to extend my hands of friendship.  Do you still have any doubt about "level" of expression?

>	=============
>
>	Deepak might have used language that you didn't like. But answer
>	the issues he raised. He said that Bangladesh exists today
>	because of Indian intervention. Why Muslim unity for the sake of
>	unity. He said that you should be able to distinguish between
                            ^^^
>	enemies and friends. You forget that Pakistan has been unfair to
                             ^^^
>	you just because they are Muslims. As he said don't be
        ^^^
>	ungrateful. Do you say anything about the destruction of temples
                       ^^^
>	in Bangaldesh ? No you won't.
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^  

[deleted]

The word "you" in English is very ambiguous.  Deepak's use of the word you
wasn't ambiguous at all, since he addressed the letter directly to me.  You
(Raman) have addressed the above to me as well.  So I think he doesn't demand
an answer from all BDshis on the above alligations.  Am I right Raman?  You
want to know why I have forgotten India's role in our liberation war,
why I can't distiguish between enemies and friends, why I didn't say anything
about the destruction of temples in BD.  Do I understand you right?  If your
word "you" is directed to all BDshis, then I can't answer that, because I
am not in position to do so - no one is.  So, let me answer your questions
one by one: to understand ny view on hindu vs. muslim (in your opinion enemy
vs. friends) please read my scb article #9131, 31086 (scp), 9041 etc.; on India's role read my scp article # 31086; on enemies and friends read my scb articles
# 9215, 9241, 9252 (not mine, written to me).  In order to read those article
just type those #s while you are in scb (in case you don't know).  When it comes to blaming someone, I don't like ambiguity or vagueness.  If you want to know
my position on the  topics that you've mentioned, you really should read those
articles before we can carry out another round of discussion.  I have a very clear stand on each of these issues.  I am not ambiguous at all.  

 hope I have answered all of your questions, feel free to ask further questions should they arise.
>
>
>Rajesh Raman
>
>--
>

khaleq
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh