From: chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu (Steve Chaney : Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.0)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.birthright
Subject: The mother of all Feminist Majority challenges
Date: 8 Sep 92 16:01:55 GMT
Organization: California State University Sacramento
Originator: chaneysa@nextnet


Attention, attention pro-aborts.

We have heard time and again about your Feminist Majority. Okay, Fund for a
Feminist Majority.

Where in the heck do you come off with this "majority?"

You have two BIG women's groups prowling across the abortion wars
battlefield - National Organization for Women, and Concerned Women of
America.

We hear TIME AND AGAIN about the NOW Crowd and the Fund for a Feminist
Majority, with their 280,000+ activists.

But we never hear about Eagle Forum or Concerned Women of America, thanks
to the American Media.

How is it that the American Media can not see Concerned Women of America
when it packs 750,000+ members?

Why is it that we hear more about Molly Yard than we hear of Beverly
LaHaye, who leads CWA, which is almost 3 times bigger than NOW?

1) Is the American Media stark raving BLIND ?
2) Do we now live in a universe where 280,000 > 750,000 ?

HOW IN THE HELL IS IT THAT THE LARGER OF THE TWO WOMEN'S GROUPS GETS
ABSOLUTELY NO COVERAGE WHATSOEVER IN ANY MEDIA STATION ACROSS THE PLANET
EARTH?

The fact is, you pro-aborts have quite a hell of a lot of explaining to do
when you can't find 300,000 feminists, yet conservative pro-life women can
find 750,000.
You have a whole lot MORE to explain when the media talks so big about the
NOW vote and the NOW Giant, when an even BIGGER giant, the CWA, dwarfs them
like Andre the Giant.

By the sheer law of mathematics, 750,000 activists make up a STRONGER force
than 280,000.

Do pro-aborts know their math? By their constant claims that CWA has no
power of relevance in America, they obviously have never taken a single
math class.

So, Dan King, how is it that we have more WOMEN Pro Fetus Zealots than COAT
HANGER TERRORISTS, hanging around the activist circuit, and you can still
claim that the former has no right to be heard?

Class dismissed.


=============================================================================
>##       "My logic is based on ... a religious perspective which says
>##  that personhood begins at birth (actually a month after birth if
>##  we want to be precise)..."
>##    -- Gloria Feldt,
>##       chief executive, Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona

>##   "I see nothing extreme or reprehensible about this statement."
>##     -- garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) <BtnDAw.Iwo.2@cs.cmu.edu>
=============================================================================
|Pro-Contraception   Pro-Freedom of Religion, Speech & Sexual Orientation   |
|Pro-Privacy    Pro-Humanism   Pro-Freedom of Choice 	Registered Democrat | 
|                                                                           |
|			Card-carrying member, NRLC                          |
|           Dedicated to achieving civil rights for the unborn              |
=============================================================================
BBBBBB     OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    Founder: Steve Chaney 
B    B     O      O   S         S          <chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu> 
BBBBBBBB   O     OO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    
BB     B   O     OO        SS        SS    Borg Operating 
BBBBBBBB O OOOOOOOO O SSSSSSS O SSSSSSS O  Space Systems, Revision 2.0 

	       The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS. 
Newsgroups: talk.abortion