HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Date: 24 Nov 92 03:05:18 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

In article <1992Nov23.224329.13768@cis.ohio-state.edu> lassiter@catnip.cis.ohio-state.edu (douglas scott lassiter) writes:

>  to live in off-base housing). Before gays can be fully accepted in the 
> military, homosexuality must be better accepted by society first.

If that arguement had been accepted for the integration of the military,
the army would still be segregated.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton
From: steven@advtech.uswest.com ( Steve Novak)
Subject: Re: Liberals DO oppose First Amendment rights
Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:54:44 GMT

> = Steve Novak replies to himself:
>> =  <1992Nov16.165128.18625@csc.ti.com> d writes:
>>> = maxwell@deep-13.gizmo.com writes:
>>>> = Marc Barrett writes:

>>>> Consertives, however, always respect the First Amendment
>>>>  rights of everybody, regardless of opposing viewpoints.

>>> Are you a freshman or just stupid?

>>It's so good to see you supporting Marc's right to free speech and defending
>>it to your last breath. . .

>Marc said nothing to imply censorship.  And I support to the death the
 ^^^^ Oops! That should be "maxwell", who replied to Marc's post.

>right of you and the student to make stupid statements.  BTW, clueless,
>the "stupid" part is MY OPINION.  Also protected by the First Amendment.
-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Steve Novak |    |"Wacker the K"| 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
steven@advtech.USWest.Com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu (Michael L. Le Houllier)
Subject: Re: Here Are The Undeniable Truths of Life
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, NH.
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 03:28:51 GMT

In article <grendel.722135201@camelot> grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:
>In <1992Nov16.190611.1@woods.ulowell.edu> enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
>
>>>In article <Bxtovu.7Ap@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, 
>>>tz10956@meibm12.cen.uiuc.edu (Thomas Zych) writes:
>>>> sjthomas@cup.portal.com (Stephen J Thomas) writes:
>>>>                                                                   
>>>>Rush Limbaugh's 35 Truths                                          
>
>>>>20. There IS a god.                                                
>
>>    	One minor point.  The God of the Judeo-Christian tradition is also the
>>God of the Islamic tradition.  Allah, as Moslems call     God, is one in the
>>same with Yawheh, Jesuus Christ, and The Holy Spirit.
>
>The Moslems don't see it that way, nor do most Christians.  There are a lot
>of differences between the Q'ran and the Bible.  You could argue that the
>concept of single male deity is the same, but the mythology surrounding
>Allah and Mohammed is vastly different from that of Yahweh and Jesus Christ.

Read the Koran.  The Christians and Jews are recognized are "People of
the Book' in Islam.  They accept the prophets of Judaism and
Christianity, even Christ, though they don't accept His divinity.
Muhammed saw Islam as a purifying religion to Judaism and Christianity
and they had strayed from the true God, according to the Koran.
>
>Besides which, it's still a bigoted statement; I'm a Taoist, a pagan, and an
>atheist, and I don't take kindly to the imposition of absolute moral and
>religious values upon me by others, whether or not I agree with them.

If you're going to be a Daoist, at least learn to spell it.
>

God bless,
-- 
 Michael Le Houllier           *  John 3:16  * Nov 12, 1991 - Dili      
 (m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu.us) *  Remember: June 4, 1989 - Beijing
 Plymouth State Women's Soccer - #2 in the nation (Div. 3)  (15-1-2)
 Great job this season girls.  Get U MASS Dartmouth back next year!!!!
From: mk009b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu ([Matt Kaufman])
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush is RIGHT again
Date: 23 Nov 92 06:28:31 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1epe7iINNsuc@agate.berkeley.edu> yeomans@luxor.ced.berkeley.edu (Gary Todd Yeomans) writes:

>Rush was right about the UH-ReverUND JACKson-UH hiding in the wings for Clinton and the 
>big pay-off for hiding during the campaign.  Did you people see that they had dinner and
>Clinton went to one of Jackson's services where he called Clinton a "great healer"?

>Here it comes, Jackson's going to be named to the Supreme Court or Minister of the Interior
>or something.


Did anyone catch the meeting between Slick Willie and the Uh-ReverUND
JACKson.  It appears as though the meeting was "beneficil."  Hold on to your
wallets its gonna be a doosey.


>Did you people see the love-fest with Clinton on Saturday Night Live about the Gays in the 
>Military Skit.  Oh, man, did they lay in on thick.  "The greatest man of our Century..."???
>Please spare me the manure.  This guy is no saviour and I bet he won't even repeal the ban
>on homosexuals in the military.

I got to admit I was ROTFL.  

>Todd Yeomans




Matt Kaufman
Class of 1993
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:36:39 GMT
Subject: Re: Here's why I love this guy...
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, mitcheec@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu (Elliott Mitchell) writes:

> In article <mpf1.722107037@Isis.MsState.Edu>, 
> mpf1@ra.msstate.edu (Morris P. Fields) writes...
> 
> <several pounds of Morris' baggage deleted>
> 
> >Get off your high horse and really consider what you are asking for.
> >Are you asking for equality or are you asking for power over other groups
> >that you feel should be given to you for you time as a down trodden people?
> 
> I am asking that white males <particularly, but I'd entertain an extension 
> of that request> be honest with themselves, and realize that things are 
> different and better for them, on account of their race, on account of 
> their history, on account of their gender, than things are for very nearly 
> every non-white/male in the United States.

In my opinion, this is almost axiomatically obvious, but heirarchies
are present even amongst white males.  Not all white males have
equal access to opportunity.  

But, in the end, what are ya gonna do about it?  It seems reasonable
to some to try social engineering, but, as always, actions have reactions,
and there is a backlash against the kind of social engineering that
has endeavored to level the field of opportunity.

I myself do not know what to do about these sorts of things.  I can
see valid points on the conservative and the liberal and the libertarian
sides of this issue.

doug
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: sbender@navajo.dsd.es.com (Steve Bender)
Subject: Re: Here Are The Undeniable Truths of Life
Organization: Evans & Sutherland
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 00:09:20 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.160934.21158@news.stolaf.edu>, kamilewi@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Alex Kamilewicz) writes:
|> In article <1992Nov16.190611.1@woods.ulowell.edu> enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
|> >>In article <Bxtovu.7Ap@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, 
|> >>tz10956@meibm12.cen.uiuc.edu (Thomas Zych) writes:
|> >>> sjthomas@cup.portal.com (Stephen J Thomas) writes:
|> >> 
|> >>>                                                                   
|> >>>Rush Limbaugh's 35 Truths                                          
|> >>>                                                                   
|> >>>21. Abortion is wrong.                                             
|> >> 
|> >> But forcing women who cannot or do not wish to support children to have them,
|> >> in effect enslaving them, is perfectly alright.
|> >
|> >	Biology 101, Sex is first and foremost for the procreation of LIFE. 
|> >The old saying goes  here "If you don't want to get burned, don't play with
|> >fire."  It was a woman's choice to have sex or not(except cases of rape or
|> >incest) therefore she already executed her right to choose.  If a human being
|> >in the womb were just another body part abortion should be legal.(i.e. if you
|> >want your livver out take it out)  but human life is just that human life.)
|> 
|> What if she was already trying to avoid getting pregnant, i.e. like using
|> birth control, and it happened anyway?

How does an unsuccessful attempt at birth-control supercede the baby's right
to life?

Ooooh how inconvenient... Let's just kill it and jump back in the sack.

-- 
Steve Bender
Evans & Sutherland
(801) 582-5847
Salt Lake City, UT 84108

sbender@dsd.es.com

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch Day 15
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: usa
Date: 22 Nov 92 18:30:42 GMT

In <1992Nov22.061347.13993@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:

>In article <LARRY.92Nov21181531@peak.psl.nmsu.edu> larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way) writes:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 1992 01:14:57 GMT, jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) said:
>>
>>John> November 17, 1992
>>John> Dateline - Santa Barbara, CA
>>
>>John> It's now 15 days after Bill Clinton's election and Rush is still on the 
>>John> air with 532 radio affiliates and 207 TV affiliates.
>>John> -- 
>>
>>And Limbaugh remains a jerk.

>Ah, what witty repartee! What shrewd insisiveness! What cutting satire! What
                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>a bold and engaging statement on the issues! The hallmark of a Clinton 
>supporter, to be sure!

What exemplary spelling!
BTW, I wouldn't get into the "issues" issue if I were you.  You started this
post, and it's basically a waste of bandwidth.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.president.clinton
From: crosmun@crosmun.rtp.dg.com (William Crosmun)
Subject: Re: Al Gore -VP Curse strkes again?
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 16:08:22 GMT
Organization: Data General Corporation, RTP, NC.

In article <1992Nov17.215208.2396@athena.cs.uga.edu> heath@athena.cs.uga.edu (Terrance Heath) writes:
>In article <1992Nov17.204031.26258@dsd.es.com> sbender@navajo.dsd.es.com (Steve Bender) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov16.181753.29925@athena.cs.uga.edu>, heath@athena.cs.uga.edu (Terrance Heath) writes:
>
>[stuff about DQ's "Murphy Brown Speech" deleted]
>
>	Oh?  And just who was he attacking? His tone certainly sounded
>as if he was meaning to point a wagging finger at someone.

OK.  One more time.  This is so easy that those who don't understand must be
refusing to understand.  What the Vice President said was:

  1.  The single best predictor of a child's poverty status is the marital
  status of the mother.  This is a fact, not left-wing or right-wing ideology,
  not an opinion, but a fact, like the Earth is round, the sky is blue, and the
  moon is made of green cheese. It's a fact.

  2. Given this fact, women who are choosing to become single mothers should
  be aware of the difficulties that they are about to face.  They should know
  what they are getting into.  The should be making the decision with their
  eyes open.

  3. Single women are not being served by the Hollywood writers, like those on
  the Murphy Brown show, who glamorize single motherhood and ignore #1.

This was not an attack on single mothers because, though there may be millions
of single mothers, and millions of reasons why they are single mothers, not
a single one of them is a single mother for the same reason that Murphy Brown
is a single mother:  she was written that way. 

>-- 
>"Black men loving black men is THE revolutionary act!"
>			-Joseph Beam_
>Terrance Heath 
>heath@athena.cs.uga.edu



===============================================================================
William Crosmun
crosmun@dg-rtp.dg.com

===============================================================================
"The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of 
 thinking we were at when we created them."

                                      Albert Einstein
===============================================================================
"As to guaranteeing bank deposits, the minute the government starts to do that
... the  government  runs  into a  probable loss.  We  do not wish to make the 
United  States Government liable  for the  mistakes and  errors of  individual
banks, and put a premium on sound banking in the future."
                                      Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933)
===============================================================================
From: michael@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Michael of Nebadon)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: thEwIndBag bashes Rev. Jackson, again
Date: 24 Nov 92 02:14:05 GMT
Organization: The Great Beyond

In article <23NOV199209294028@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu> mitcheec@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu (Elliott Mitchell) writes:
>In article <LARRY.92Nov22214808@peak.psl.nmsu.edu>, 
>larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way) writes...
>
>>I'd like to draw YOUR attention that alt.fan.rush-limbaugh has had
>>postings both praising and complaining about Mr. Limbaugh since its
>>inception. Flame baiting and chain pulling are going to continue here AND
>>in alt.rush-limbaugh too.
>> 
>In light of that, I'd like to submit the following...

[ ... ]

Gee, thanks.

Have you thought about sending your resume to the Washington Post?
Pulitzer Prizes have been handed out there for stories displaying far
less creativity. ;-)

michael@afterlife.ncsc.mil
From: shapiro@cfsctc.enet.dec.com (Steve Shapiro)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Just a thought on Condoms.
Date: 18 Nov 92 13:15:39 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation - Marlboro, MA
Organisation: SKS Computer Consulting, Inc.


In article <1992Nov18.000137.1@woods.ulowell.edu>, enor@woods.ulowell.edu
writes...

>	1.  ABSTAIN from sex until marriage.  Your life is worth it.  Plus it 
>	    may even be more enjoyable.
> 
>	2.  Don't take illeagal drugs, at all especially those which require
>	    you to use a hypodermic needle.

I believe you are off base.

The PROBLEM, arises from UNSAFE intercourse and UNSAFE use of needles. (Note
the keyword of UNSAFE). 

AIDS will not and cannot be transmitted between 2 individuals who DO NOT HAVE
THE VIRUS. Regardless of their actions. 

If neither individual has the virus, then there is no way the virus can be
transmitted, regardless of whether they engage in intercourse or IV drug use
(whether or not this drug use is licit or illicit. After all, there are quite a
few people in this country who take licit IV drugs, ie: insulin).

The solution is to know your PARTNER. Regular testing is the only way to really
know.

Note: I am NOT ADVOCATING pre-marital sex nor the use of illicit drugs. I AM
indicating that these actions in and of themselves are NOT a cause.

Regards,
Steve.

/*******************************************************************
* Steve Shapiro                 * All views and opinions expressed *
* SKS Computer Consulting, Inc. * are my own and are offered as-is *
********************************************************************
* Steve.Shapiro@f440.n101.z1.fidonet.org  BBS: (508) 664-6354 N81  *
*******************************************************************/
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: jay.wise@mail.trincoll.edu
Subject: Re: Rush is RIGHT again
Organization: Trinity College
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 06:10:40 GMT

In article <1epe7iINNsuc@agate.berkeley.edu> yeomans@luxor.ced.berkeley.edu
(Gary Todd Yeomans) writes:
>Rush was right about the UH-ReverUND JACKson-UH hiding in the wings for
Clinton and the 
>big pay-off for hiding during the campaign.  Did you people see that they had
dinner and
>Clinton went to one of Jackson's services where he called Clinton a "great
healer"?
>
>Here it comes, Jackson's going to be named to the Supreme Court or Minister of
the Interior
>or something.
>
Hey, thanks for that well-reasoned and extremely logical argument, big guy!
That's right, Jesse Jackson and Bill Clinton have been openly feuding for
five years (ever since Jackson called the DLC Democrats for the Leisure
Class), but, hey, it's obviously just a coverup that's been plotted for
half a decade. And maybe Jimmy Carter will get Secretary of State!

The fact is that Jesse Jackson and Bill Clinton have two wildly different
agendas -- things they have always and will always disagree about. Just 
like Rush Limbaugh has a different set of priorities than George Bush --
but wasn't that good ole incorruptible Rush himself out shilling for the ex
President on the campaign trail?

Anyway, please try to reason out your arguments. There are enough moronic
things already spewed forth (most of them by Limbaugh himself, whose show
is a tonic for the paranoid and repressed made up of the most wildly half-baked
assumptions and laughably flimsy accusations), that I would hope you
would try to cut down on the number you yourself send out.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: hagerjd@carina.unm.edu (John D. Hager)
Subject: Re: Not in a Rush to see Rush anymore
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 05:22:17 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <41447@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> pvanmeur@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Pim van Meurs) writes:
>In article <By4J0C.KHM@news.cso.uiuc.edu> wiggins@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (Don Wiggins) writes:
>>Well I guess this means that, since you won't be listening to the
>>Rushmeister any longer, we will somehow have to struggle through
>>this last bastion of conservatism without your deeply profound 
>>comments.  Thank you so much for guiding us this far.
>> |Don Wiggins                           | Happiness is wanting what you get.|
>
>I am surprised.. Does one have to listen to Rush to help
>Conservative people accept the  defeat. It's now more than ever that
>we have to stop their raving and insulting arguments and should help
>them get used to liberalism and social responsibilities (ouch).
                  ^^^^^^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There's a contradiction of terms!

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.president.clinton
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Subject: Re: Al Gore -VP Curse strkes again?
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 00:26:54 GMT
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <1992Nov18.145634.1056@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> walker@superboy.jsc.nasa.gov writes:
>
>Yesterday my wife heard Bill Clinton DEFENDING Dan "Mr. Potatoe Head"
>Quayle's stance and statements concerning Murphy Brown.
>
>Argggggg.
>
>Looks like you Dems. bought a wolf in sheeps clothing.

    Somehow, I think there's a little something missing from this account.
Has anyone else heard this?  
    If it were this simple, the news media would have spread it all over
the place.  I'd be very interested to know the entire, accurate story.

-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ. 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn)
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch Day 16
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:32:11 GMT

     I believe that what John is doing is replying to the many posters who 
predicted that Rush's show would be cancelled because Clinton was elected.

>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>%"Show me a young man who is a conservative,%
>% and I'll show you a man with no heart,    %
>% show me an old man who is a liberal, and  %
>% I'll show you a man with no brain."       %
>%    <-- Winston Churchill                  %
>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

     I like this quote, even though I don't personally consider myself
heartless... :-)

                                      Steve
///
-- 
    Steve Casburn (scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)
    They gave me differential calculus, and I said "Hit me again"
    So they gave me integral calculus, and I said "Hit me again"
    Now I have vector calculus, and...I'm starting to lose consciousness...
From: shapiro@cfsctc.enet.dec.com (Steve Shapiro)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Think about it
Date: 20 Nov 92 16:55:29 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation - Marlboro, MA
Organisation: SKS Computer Consulting, Inc.


In article <grendel.722193059@camelot>, grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha
Bourgea) writes...

>But there isn't some liberal with his own radio talkshow, none that comes 
>anywhere within the orbit of Rush.  

On radio, 

Larry King 

jumps to mind.

And on TV:

Arsenio
Whoopi
Jay Leno

(and the list goes onandonandonandon...)

Of course they aren't of the calibre of Rush, but that's their problem.

>I think it's about the conservatives stop whining about their impotence
>in the field of communication and start some meaningful discussion.

I agree. Anyone can bitch and moan. It takes a real effort to go out and
accomplish.

Here in Bahston (Boston for you non-new englanders), on WHDH there was a purely
liberal local talk show host who had a multi-hour (4 I think) time slot after
Rush. He did OK I guess, but got replaced by 2 guys; one is a liberal and one
is a conservative. I guess that Rush is just a tough act to follow. 

Regards,
Steve.

/*******************************************************************
* Steve Shapiro                 * All views and opinions expressed *
* SKS Computer Consulting, Inc. * are my own and are offered as-is *
********************************************************************
* Steve.Shapiro@f440.n101.z1.fidonet.org  BBS: (508) 664-6354 N81  *
*******************************************************************/
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh