HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pjm9806@ucs.usl.edu (Mejia Pablo J)
Subject: Samsung VGA monitor problems
Organization: Ex-Postal Employees Assault Rifle Club
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 09:08:58 GMT


  Situation:  my roommate is bringing back a system with a Samsung VGA
  monitor (old, probably 4-5 years) that his father does not need after
  going the 486 route.  Yesterday, the intensity on the monitor went to
  hell.  No warning, just went to an extremely high level with no change
  in anything.  

  It seems to me that a component has failed (i.e., a cap or resistor)
  which has caused the intensity to rise to abnormal levels.

  If he turns the intensity down ALL the way, the monitor is readable in
  text-only mode, but fuzzes out in graphics mode.

  Any suggestions??  I'm an electronics tech, but have no exerience with
  television-type systems.  My best guess is that a resistor has failed
  open, but I no NOTHING about this type of circuit.

  Anyone know of a problem endemic to early Samsung VGA monitors, or know
  anything about VGA intensity circuits??

  Please rsvp via e-mail, as the traffic level on this group is VERY high.


                                 Thanx, 
                                     Allen (not Pablo: his account, my opinions)


-- 
  We are Microsoft. 
  UNIX is outdated. OS/2 is irrelevant. 
  Openness is futile. Bugs are undocumented features.
  Prepare to be assimilated.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib)
Subject: Re: Is there any merit to the 486SX?
Organization: Indiana University
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 21:42:33 GMT

In article <1hnr72INNank@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> Kiboillk@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Bill Karwin) writes:

>I am under the impression that the 486SX is really a 486DX with
>the FPU disabled.  And the 487SX is really a full 486DX, and when
>it is installed into a 486SX system it bypasses or disables the
>486SX chip.  The combination of 486SX + 487SX is more expensive
>than a 486DX.  This seems like a very inefficient design to me.  :-)


This is what Intel planned originally. However they failed to account
for the Independant Motherboard Manufacturer. These days a lot of the 
motherboards will take a 486SX or DX interchangeably, with a simple 
jumper setting, in the same socket. They often also have the extra 
socket for the overdive chip (modified 486 DX2 or the mysterious chip-
to-come).




-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iskandar Taib                          | The only thing worse than Peach ala
Internet: NTAIB@SILVER.UCS.INDIANA.EDU |    Frog is Frog ala Peach
Bitnet:   NTAIB@IUBACS                 !
From: Brian.Milner@brunel.ac.uk (Brian D Milner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Help!! *Two* parallel printers from 1 PC??????????????????????????????
Date: 8 Jan 93 09:43:19 GMT
Organization: Brunel University, West London, UK


	I am running a laser printer from my PC's parallel port. Now I'd 
like to add a parallel dot matrix printer as well. 

	Can I *add* a parallel port to my PC? 
	Can I use a serial port to run a parallel printer? 
	Can I get a switch thing to direct my output from one port 
	between two printers?
	Is there any other way I can get this going?

	Only *you* know the answers.

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Brian Milner, The Computer Centre, Brunel University , West London, UK   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|brian.milner@brunel.ac.uk | To shut down Internet; Post to the newsgroups|
+--------------------------+       saying you think 'Lost in Space'       |
			   |       is better than 'Startrek - TOS'        |
			   +----------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: khor@bnr.ca (Kyle Hor)
Subject: Re: Mixing DRAMS with different refresh rates
Reply-To: khor@bnr.ca
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 18:29:16 GMT

In article <C0qtH7.MGM@news.iastate.edu>, jdwhite@iastate.edu (Jason White) writes:
|> I just replaced my 36 256x1, 100ns DRAMS with 18 1MBx9, 70ns DRAMS to upgrade
|> my 286 from 1 to two megs of RAM.  I was wondering if I could put 18 of the
|> 256x1 DRAMS in the machine in order to get another 512K.  I'm pretty sure the
|> motherboard can be configured to handle it, but I'm concerned because the
|> two typed of DRAMS have different refresh rates.  Is this going to effect the
|> operation and integrity of my computer?
|> 
When you say 18 -- a assume you mean 2 SIMM or SIPPs, where each
SIMM/PP have 9 chips.  In other words you have 2 1Mb SIMM/PPs and
would like to add 2 256K SIMM/PPs.
 
The answer is NO.  You cannot mix different SIMM/PP memory size in
the same bank, one bank being 4 SIMM/PP.

Please note that the issue here is not mixing 70ns and 100ns DRAMs.

............................................................................
. Kyle Hor                    .    /       / _   .  Email  khor@bnr.ca     .
. Bell-Northern Research Ltd. .   /__\  / / /_\  .  Phone  (613) 763-2488  .
. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada     .  / \  \/ /  \__  .  ESN          393-2488  .
....................................__/.....................................
................  standard disclaimer, 2 cents opinion  ....................
.............  searching forever, for the perfect solution  ................
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: Panu.Juvonen@hut.fi (Panu Juvonen)
Subject: AST Preview I/O-card
Reply-To: Panu.Juvonen@hut.fi
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Distribution: comp
Date: 5 Jan 93 11:57:21


If anyone happens to have any information about the jumpers on
AST Preview I/O-card, I would be grateful to get that info.
Alternatively a number (voice and/or fax) for AST would help.

Thank you.
--
Panu Juvonen

"i'm tired in general and sleepy in particular.
 i have a great desire to move elsewhere."
	- excerpt from 'work' by Andrei Codrescu

Email address : Panu.Juvonen@hut.fi (preferred)
           or : juvonen@vipunen.hut.fi
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Tuesday, 5 Jan 1993 16:46:40 EST
From: <IP25334@portland.caps.maine.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Problems w/ GTWY 2000 486SX
Distribution: usa

If you have access to Compuserve you can reach Gateway 2000 Technical Support
in section 13 of the PCVENC forum.  They usually answers questions within a
day.  They also have a PC BBS you can call.  Beats bust signals!

Scott Ewing
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: chans@cs.curtin.edu.au (Sean Chan)
Subject: Re: Slow floppy drive access!!??!!
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 15:44:55 GMT

marklc@umbc3.umbc.edu (Mr. Mark L. Cohen) writes:

>I had the same problem when setting up a 386/25 with AMI BIOS.  Everything was
>fine except the floppy drives were VERY slow like you said.  The solution
>was (aggrivatingly) simple -- turn on shadow RAM in your BIOS settings.  On
>this computer after I did this, the floppy drives were fast like they should
>be.

>    Hope this helps...
>      Mark Cohen   marklc@umbc7.umbc.edu

I have shadow RAM enabled...however, it's still slow...

Sean Chan           Curtin University of Technology 
                    Bentley, Western Australia.  
E-Mail : chans@marsh.cs.curtin.edu.au
         pchans@cc.curtin.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: rdosser@UTKUX1.UTK.EDU (rdosser)
Subject: Shipping Computer Overseas
Organization: University of Tennessee Computing Center
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 19:54:11 GMT

I need to ship a pc to England, and need information on how to
best go about it. It's an old machine, to be sent to a friend for
personal use at a university.
I have the original packing boxes, so that's not a problem. My main
questions are:
1. Can it be sent in less than three weeks for under $300?
2. Who is best, U.S. mail, UPS, Fed X or someone else?
3. How can I avoid import and/or tariff problems?
4. How much does insurance cost?
If anyone can shed some light for me, I would be grateful.
Thanks

 
***********************************************************************
* Ralph Dosser       rdosser@utkux1.utk.edu                           *
* The University of Tennessee Computing Center                        *
* Do you think I'd be working in a place like this                    *
*                                  if I could afford a real snake?    *
***********************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: pastor@prc.unisys.com (Jon Pastor)
Subject: Re: tape formatting
Organization: not much...
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 21:39:37 GMT

Nope.  I'm using the Colo FC-10 controller...
From: chrisw@castle.ed.ac.uk (C Walton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: RM Nimbus memory
Date: 6 Jan 93 11:57:18 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: Edinburgh University

Has anyone heard of the RM Nimbus 286 ?

Can anyone get me a copy of a CMOS setup disk or tell me what sort of
memory it takes ?

Thanks in advance -

Chris (cdw@dcs.ed.ac.uk)
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:35537 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:1030
From: hielsche@aragorn.CSEE.Lehigh.Edu (Frank Hielscher)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit
Subject: Re: Nanao 550
Date: 12 Jan 93 03:55:25 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

marka@SSD.CSD.HARRIS.COM (Mark Ashley) writes:

>I'm looking at 17 inch monitors and have seen/heard the following
>comments: NEC is problematic, MAG has a very small actual screen,
>and Viewsonic doesn't have too high a refresh rate.

>So now I'm looking at Nanao's 17 inch, specifically 
>the 550 (can't remember the exact designation). Any body have
>good or bad comments about this ?

>There's also the 560 with a finer dot pitch but it's almost $2K
>so it's out of my reach.

The Nanao monitors have received excellent reviews for quality and reliability.
They are a bit expensive. For literature, call Nanao at 1-800-800-5202.

For reviews on 17" monitors, see Byte Magazine, May 1992 and PC magazine,
June 30, 1992. Both magazines rated the Nanao 550F as one of the best on the
market. The maximum viewable diagonal is 15.75" (I measured it).

A good place to buy Nanao's (and other's, too) is CAD Warehouse in Ohio.
Call them at 1-800-487-0485. I bought two Nanao's from them, a 550F in
the summer and a 660T in December.

Prices were near the lowest (compared with other ads in Computer Shopper),
and delivery was just a few days. No hassle at all. Highly recommended.
Talk to David Hoffer at CAD Warehouse. He is well informed.

Shipping costs: about $25 for the small (50 pound, via UPS) monitors
(550F, 560T), and about $50 for the large (100 pound, via a trucking company)
monitors (750F, 660T).

The "flat-screen" (slight curvature in both directions) monitors are the
550F (17", $1100) and 750F (21", $2100). They can do 1024x768 comfortably,
non-interlaced. Maximum brightness is not as much as one might like, though.
They can do 1280x1024 non-interlaced.

The Trinitron monitors are the 560T (17", $1850) and 660T (20", $2475). They
can do 1280x1024 noninterlaced, but won't quite fill the visible screen at
that resolution. The 20" 660T has a visible screen of 19" (filled out nicely
at 1024x768, beautiful), but only 17.25" diagonally at 1280x1024. Images on
the Trinitron monitors are nice and bright, and appear more distinct. The
sceen on the trinitron tube appears flatter than on the "F=flat" tube, despite
the fact that the T-tube has a horizontal curvature (it's absolutely flat
vertically).

Given a choice, I definitely prefer the trinitron tube. But you know, I assume,
that all trinitron monitors have one or two very thin black horizontal lines
running though the picture. These are the wires inside the tube that provide
tension for the shadow masks. I was worried about this when I ordered the
660T, but the two lines are mostly invisible. They show up faintly on a white
screen. Turns out not to be annoying at all.

The bottom line: For $1100, the 550F would still be my first choice. If
money is of no concern (yeah, right), I would get a trinitron monitor.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib)
Subject: Re: A1080 RGB Monitor and PC Video card
Keywords: How can I use this monitor with a pc compatable computer?
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 20:42:54 GMT

In article <1indk5INNevg@uwm.edu> kdog@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Kyle David Abts) writes:
>I have an old Amiga 1080 Monitor, and was wondering if there is a way to
>hook it up to an IBM compatible system.  
>
>Dose anybody know what type of video card could run this monitor.
>
>It has an RGB, 9 pin input that can be set to either Digital (Neg. or Pos.)
>or Analog.  It also has a regular video, audio, and chroma input..
>
>Thanks for any help
>

I've heard of people using CGA monitors as TV sets to it might 
work with CGA.











-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iskandar Taib                          | The only thing worse than Peach ala
Internet: NTAIB@SILVER.UCS.INDIANA.EDU |    Frog is Frog ala Peach
Bitnet:   NTAIB@IUBACS                 !
From: mcdonald@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (J. D. McDonald)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: NEC 4FG Problems
Summary: also on 5FG (anyone know about 6FG?)
Date: 8 Jan 93 00:20:39 GMT
Organization: UIUC SCS

In article <1993Jan7.230838.14290@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> yee@nimios.eng.mcmaster.ca (Paul Yee) writes:

>In article <881404m.4.726423539@axe.acadiau.ca> 881404m@axe.acadiau.ca (SEAN MICHAEL MCCORMICK) writes:
>>I bought a NEC 4FG in November of last year and I had to bring it back 
>>because the picture was tilted downward on the left side of the screen and 
>>the upper corners were unfocused.

>[story about NEC service woes deleted for sake of brevity]

>>Has anybody experienced similar problems? 
>The moral of the story: NEC can't get things right even in a year and a
>half after introducing the FG series - I don't think that it speaks well
>of their engineering abilities, to put it politely (and I am an EE, so I
>know whereof I speak).

We've been getting 17 inch monitors galore, these as well as the Mag 17
inchers. Also teh Gateway 2000 15 inch ones that come with the
top of the line 486's.

Every single one has had to be adjusted. Only one out of maybe
10 or 12 was not adjustable to spec. You need a skilled tweaker; we're
big enough to have one in house, thankfully.

My particular MAG 17 needed focusing.

Doug McDonald
From: probert@fires1.uucp (Neal Probert)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Where can I find NEC CD-ROM driver for Adaptec AHA-1542 SCSI controller ?
Date: 12 Jan 1993 14:55:41 GMT
Organization: Scientific Research Labs, Ford Motor Company
Distribution: na
Reply-To: probert@fires1.srl.ford.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: fires1.srl.ford.com

I've got MSCDEX.EXE, but now I need a device driver for the NEC CDR-84 on an
adaptec AHA-1542 SCSI controller.

Thanks.

-- 
    FORD       | Neal W. Probert   E3154 SRL    | probert@fires1.srl.ford.com
 SCIENTIFIC    | Ford Scientific Research Labs  | 313-845-8178 FAX 313-845-8202
RESEARCH LABS  | Dearborn, MI 48121-2053        | 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: mikes@mikes.mentorg.com (Mike Stanbro)
Subject: Re: MSCDEX needed for PC with Adaptec AHA-1542 and NEC CDR-84
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 19:50:25 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: mentor
Keywords: 
Followup-To: 

In article <1is7t9INNb4l@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com>, probert@fires1.uucp (Neal Probert) writes:
|> I have a PC with an Adaptec AHA-1542 SCSI controller and I have 2 disk drives,
|> a tape drive, and the NEC CDR-84 CD-ROM drive.  I need an MSCDEX.EXE that
|> works with the Adaptec's controller and software to make my CD-ROM go.
|> 

You actually need more than just MSCDEX.EXE.  You also need a driver specifically for
the Adaptec controller that knows how to talk CD-ROM.  The MSCDEX.EXE program is a
sort of universal go-between for Windows and the device driver to the CD-ROM.  

You can contact Adaptec and try to get what you need or you might be able to contact NEC
and get it.  I personally gave up on Adaptec as their always made me wait on hold
for a long time and then took my name and number but never called me back.

Either way, you are going to have to pay for what you need.
-- 
Mike Stanbro                       
Mentor Graphics Corporation
mikes@pdx.mentorg.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: nagano@nosc.mil (Michael Y. Nagano)
Subject: Re: What's the deal? My chip says "SX-25"; Norton says "SX-33"
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 00:41:59 GMT

I would like to know how Norton's Utilities knows it is a 33 mhz chip
on a 25 mhz machine.  This does not seem like something that can be
tested for.

Mike Nagano
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: etllnfr@eddie.ericsson.se (Lyndon Fletcher)
Subject: Re: NO ROM BASIC, SYSTEM HALTED ???
Organization: Ericsson Cellular Division
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 12:32:30 GMT

>> The Golden Gryphon writes:
>>
>> Msg-ID: <1993Jan05.132239.3881@openage.openage.com>
>> Posted: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 13:22:3
>>
>> Org.  : Open Age, Inc.
>>
>> rubin@procon.jhuapl.edu (Don Rubin) writes:
>>
>>
>> >I have been fooling around with a new motherboard
>> >and some disks and get the following message when
>> >I try to boot a 340mb IDE drive
>>
>> >NO ROM BASIC
>> >SYSTEM HALTED
>>
>> You may not have the boot partition active.  Hookup the drive and run fdisk
>> off
>> floppy, and check the partition status.
>> --

I only saw an answer to this message not the full version so if the following
 has been covered already I'm sorry :-)

I think the problem is that the drive has been formated with IBM DOS (PCDOS).
The original PC's had cassette basic built into the ROM's as well as the usual
BIOS stuff. PCDOS would check the availability of this ROM basic during
bootup and would print the error message above if it couldn't find it.

Because no clones included cassette BASIC on ROM, vanilla DOS does not
perform this trick. Check that the floppies you are using are MSDOS not
PCDOS and if the 340Mb drive is bootable check that it is MSDOS not PCDOS.

Fletch
--
"All irregularities will be handled by the forces controlling each dimension.
 Trans-uranic heavy elements may not be used where there is Life. Medium atomic
 weights are available -- Gold, Lead, Copper, Jet, Diamond, Radium, Sapphire,
 Silver, and Steel. --- Sapphire and Steel have been assigned......."
From: twong@civil.ubc.ca (Thomas Wong)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: 24 bit color flatbed scanners
Date: 11 Jan 1993 22:11:46 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Civil Engineering, U.B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: sam.civil.ubc.ca

Hi all. We're in the market for a 24 bit color flatbed scanner (as
opposed to the handheld ones). Price is not an issue so far cause we
don't know what they cost yet. I can't find any articles in Byte or PC
Mag. But we don't have ALL the issues. Are there any recommendations?
Experiences anyone like to share...etc?
Thanks in advance.

Thomas.

--
    /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
   /*   Thomas Y. K. Wong            BITNET:        usercedl@ubcmtsg       */
  /*   Civil Eng., U.B.C       INTERNET:     thomas_wong@civil.ubc.ca     */
 /*   Van, B.C., Canada    UUCP:    ...!uunet!civil.ubc.ca!thomas_wong   */
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: jon@sed.stel.com (Jon Radel)
Subject: Re: 2 IDE drives
Summary:  How to hook up 2 IDE drives
Keywords: IDE
Organization: Stanford Telecom, SED, Reston
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 93 23:33:06 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.160826.1605@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> cwatters@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Coyt D Watters) writes:
>This is/should be a FAQ question, but since I couldn't find a FAQ....
>
...
>Can I just hook up another IDE drive and change the CMOS, or do I have to 
>bother with the master/slave problems I've read about?

If anyone is e-mailing the answer to this, and related "how do I get 
2 IDE drives to run off of the same controller" questions, please
post them too!  I have two IDE drives, both of which will run on my
controller by itself, but when I hook both up the machine hangs.  There
aren't any obvious settings to change except in the CMOS.

--Jon Radel
jon@sed.stel.com

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib)
Subject: Re: Will Windows crawl on my system?
Organization: Indiana University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 04:52:58 GMT

In article <1992Dec28.011124.6964@julian.uwo.ca> wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith) writes:
>The point is, if the party line is that the minimum system for windows is
>a 386-sx-16, then there's something rotten, if not just plain wrong, that
>faster 286's aren't included in the "recommended equipment" list.

Actually, it says in the manual that a 286with 1 Meg is the minimum 
requirement, which is silly. I wouldn't run Windows on a 386 with 1
Meg. Now, a 286 with 4 or 8 Meg would be a different story altogether..



-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iskandar Taib                          | The only thing worse than Peach ala
Internet: NTAIB@SILVER.UCS.INDIANA.EDU |    Frog is Frog ala Peach
Bitnet:   NTAIB@IUBACS                 !
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger)
Subject: Re: What's the deal? My chip says "SX-25"; Norton says "SX-33"
Organization: Schlumberger Technologies, ATE division, San Jose, Ca.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 20:45:18 GMT

oldwanda (93gke@williams.edu) wrote:
: In article <1993Jan5.152504.9786@bmers95.bnr.ca> khor@bnr.ca writes:
: >For example lets take a simple switching speed from low to high.  If
: >it takes 35ns to switch (low and high voltage levels reference points
: >differs in low->high and high->low), then it will fall into the 25MHz
: >grade.  But if the switching takes only 28MHz then it will fall into
: >the 33MHz grade.
: 
: >In the actual case, the testing is a lot more complex and there are
: >hundreds of electrical tests before the chips a graded.
: 
: If this is true, then how can vendors push the 25Mhz chips to 33Mhz?
: Wouldn't they fail at the higher speeds since they were slow in
: testing?
: 

Sometimes, chip makers will test to fill orders. If they have outstanding
orders for 25Mhz parts, they will noly perform a test at 25Mhz, and ship those
that pass. When throughput is important (because of backlog), testing at
several speeds reduces the part throughput. Parts that fail may be put in a
retest bin for later testing at a slower speed rating (if they offer it) or
trashed if it failed the lowest speed rating they offer.

Also, the tests that are performed on the parts, is very rigorous. I know, my
company makes the testers that chip makers use to test these parts. The
computer makers are betting on the fact that 99.9% of the time, "pushing"
a chip will not be as rigorous as the testing that placed them in the rated
speed category, or that the part would have passed the higher speed rating,
but was simply not tested because of market demand and backlog.

In some cases, during the life of a product, newer versions of the chip may
come out, because of a die shrink, that allows production of faster parts,
but the slower parts are still the old technology. Pushing these chips is
very dangerous, because the process was never intended to yield such parts.

In any case, you do take a chance, and if at all possible, insist on a part
factory labeled to run at the speed it is being clocked at.

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies ATE   UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             Voice: (408)437-5254  FAX: (408)437-5246