HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: brophy@med.unc.edu (J. Jon Brophy)
Subject: Re: Woody Allen / Mia Farrow
Keywords: This is *BIG* in NYC, and it's only just begun
Organization: UNC-CH School of Medicine
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 21:47:30 GMT

In article <8hjyg=m@rpi.edu> garrem@aix.rpi.edu (Matthew Olsen Garretson) writes:
>In article <1992Aug18.162050.9135@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> dick1@hera.uucp (25443-vaughn) writes:
>>Allen's reputation in NYC is doing a free-fall right now.
>
>On the up side, video rentals of his movies are going ga-ga because of the
>scandal.
>
>>Allen's strong desire for privacy has always been respected by
>>the press.  No more. 
>
>At least the TV stations have agreed not to show the video tape in which
>Dylan claims she was abused.
>-- 
Gee I guess Alan Dershowitz (sp?) can't get the media to do everything he
wants.

This is no Mia Farrow and Woody Allen any more... 
This all goes to the public strategy of many High Priests  of Law.
So be it that they could not work it out in private seems.T the public
is more than willing to lap the vomitosis of Trial Lawyers.


From: ngsl@hpsgm2.sgp.hp.com (Shuh Lit NG)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 07:09:49 GMT
Subject: Request
Organization: HP Singapore Notes-Server
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

Does anyone have a REVIEW of the movie "When Harry met Sally"?
Thanx.
From: assist@orion.oac.uci.edu (ASSIST Coordination Site)
Subject: Re: Barton Fink
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 18 Aug 92 23:44:11 GMT

In article <1992Aug18.193107.21125@dazixco.ingr.com> doak@sunbug.dazixco.ingr.com writes:
>
>In article <17490143@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM>, mort@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Jeff Mortensen) writes:
>>In rec.arts.movies, meltdown@eng.umd.edu (Salil Parikh) writes:
>>
>>> I just saw Barton Fink.  Great film... except for the last ~10 minutes.
>>> What gives?
>>
>>	opposite to your view of this movie.  The first hour and fifty
>>	minutes are sumed up in one word: BORING! The last 15 minutes where
>>	interesting.  How can we have such a difference in views?
>
>
>   Since I asked the same question I'll answer too.  
>   
>   (WARNING: spoilers)
>
>   I often find movies (and books) that start slow work up to a powerful 
>ending.  Barton Fink did move slow but the characters were being developed
>and the plot was becoming more interesting.  When the writer's girlfriend
>was murdered and the neighbor left the package behind it seemed to be
>getting to the meat of the movie.  The fact that it then went into
>never-never land instead of twisting and turning it's way to a wonderful
>denouement was dissapointing.  In my humble opinion, it was the last
>15 minutes that failed, not what came before.
>   
>
>>	This is not just my opinion.  I had several guests over to watch this
>>	movie, and they all have different tastes in films, yet they all      
>>        agreed that this movie was BORING!   
>>	
>   Maybe you and your friends watch too many Hollywood movies.  
>
>
>   But since you found the last 15 minutes so interesting maybe you 
>can explain what no one else has:  What did it all mean?
>
>
>
>First, I should say that I thought this movie was brilliant
>and not the least bit boring.  In all the postings I have read
>regarding this movie, no one made reference to the most obvious
>and ironic story line.  In the beggining of the film, Barton says that
>he wants to write about the "common man".  In walks John Goodman's
>character, a simple man,  who begins telling him, what else
>"his stories."  Here is all the material which Barton needs to write
>about, however, he is too self-absorbed in the fact that he has a mental
>block, that he takes John Goodman's chatter as a distraction instead
>of inspiration.  Barton has also become wrapped up in
>the "Hollywood" trap of getting this "wrestling" 
>film done for the studio in time, thus, straying further from 
>his original intentions at the beginning of the film.

>Kris
--
From: jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JOSEPH ALOYSIUS MCVEIGH)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: \*GREAT MOVIE ACTORS\*
Date: 13 Aug 92 21:54:41 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

i14@nikhefh.nikhef.nl (Martin Los) writes:

[deletia]

>not mentioned yet :

>Talisa Soto (Bond girl)
Good looking, bad acting (the next Maria Conchita Alonso?)

>Helen Slater (I loooved her in the secret of my success)
Catch "City Slickers". She plays a role that's best described as "the blonde".

>Catherine Oxenberg (Dynasty, does anybody know a movie in which she plays?)

Ken Russell's "The Lair of the White Worm". This movie must be seen to be
believed. I can't describe it, but definitely worth a rental if you like to
see movies way off the mainstream.


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Aloysius McVeigh | "...a contradictory, agonized, elusive, defiant,
jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu  |  childishly egotistical, sometimes plain silly,
       --------         |  sometimes repellent and sometimes dazzling and
      "N.I.N.A."        |               admirable figure...."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: jsciv@vtucs.cc.vt.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: What do you call YOUR remote?
Date: 17 Aug 92 21:05:25 GMT
Organization: Virginia Tech, Department of Graduate Slaves

Ours is the Thing.  At first the question "where is the Thing?" was accompanied
by a thumb flexing gesture, but that got old, and it became known as the Thing.
I think the main reason is that it's one of those giant programmable remotes 
that controls our TV, VCR, Amp, and CD player (which all happen to be the 
same brand as the remote).  Of course, since each component also has a remote,
we had to come up with a scheme to say which remote was the one in control...
					*--Joe--*
					jsciv@vtucs.cc.vt.edu
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: (Bram Stoker's) Dracula
Date: 18 Aug 92 19:51:29 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

In article <ed.714095560@cwis>, ed@cwis.unomaha.edu (Ed Stastny) writes:

> What's the poop on the new Dracula film?
  
> I heard that it's directed by Francis Ford Coppolla, stars Winona Ryder
> as Mina, Anthony Hopkins as Van Helsing, and whatsisname as Drac.  
Gary Oldman as Vlad the Impaler.  <grin>
Keanu Reeves as Jonathan Harker
Tom Waits as Renfield
Cary Elwes as Dr.Seward
Bill Campbell as ?  (a character from the book never in a movie)

I think I should make this a FAQ and post it every week.  :^)
  
> Any new news?  When'll it be out?  WILL it be out?  What company is
> releasing it?  Info, info, info!

Thanksgiving.  Seen the teaser posters that say "BEWARE" in dripping 
red blood?  They also have part of a stone gargoyle in the shadows.

I'm very excited about it...

Greg Bole                              "Lord, thank you for that waitress in 
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu            South Bend.  You know the one, she was
                                        calling your name the whole time."
                                          Tom Hanks in _A Leauge of Their Own_
From: billb@crpmks.uucp (Bill Bochnik (Info Systems))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: "Stirred not shaken" or "Shaken not stirred" ?
Keywords: Bond
Date: 20 Aug 92 15:46:40 GMT
Reply-To: billb@crpmks.UUCP (Bill Bochnik (Info Systems))
Organization: Ciba-Geigy Corporation

In article <1992Aug19.120827.15503@uts.uni-c.dk> uniel@uts.uni-c.dk (Erik Lawaetz) writes:
>
>I need help to resolve a bet concerning James Bond.
>
>The question is, does  HE  (not other characters in the Bond movies)
>want his Martini
>
>	"Stirred not shaken"  (1)
>
>or
>
>	"Shaken not stirred"  (2)
>?
>

Shaken not stirred (2)
-- 
Bill Bochnik			| It's hard to be a James Bond in an Abbott
Systems Analyst 		|	and Costello world.
Ciba-Geigy Corporation		| Signed and sealed, they deliver oblivion.
philabs!crpmks!billb		| It's worse than that, he's dead Jim.
From: boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com (The Man from Another Place)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: With cuts restored:  The Frankenstein Academy of Film.
Date: 13 Aug 92 06:03:07 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation

In article <1992Aug12.150123.1211@cs.ucla.edu>, reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher) writes...

} And one that's still on the slab, waiting for a really big lightning
} bolt that almost certainly will never come -

} "Greed" - Eric von Stroheim's silent masterpiece.  [...]

} And one that's on the slab, but needing a smaller, less improbable
} lightning bolt -

} "The Gold Rush" -  [...]

And somewhere in the middle (but closer to the "really big lightning blot")
is Orson Welles' original cut of THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS.

In article <1992Aug12.210021.9943@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, cb366@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark B. Bendiksen) writes...

} While we're on the subject of Spielberg, _Close Encounters of the Third
} Kind_ also underwent surgery for its ABC presentation. The film shown
} was a combination of the original and the Special Edition, and included
} all scenes from both. I wish I had a copy of it on tape because I like
} many of the scenes which were cut from the original for the Special
} Edition  [...]  and as far as I know the Special Edition is the only
} version available on home video.

Only if you believe that "home video" only covers videotape.

There are three different versions of CE3K available on laserdisc:

The original RCA/Columbia release is of the Special Edition (in pan-&-scan).

The Criterion Collection CLV edition is of the original 1977 version (in
    letterbox format).

The Criterion CAV edition is basically the 1977 version, but it includes
    the footage from the Special Edition not in the original, all at the
    end of the appropriate sides, and chapter-encoded so that you can
    insert them into the right places in the movie. In theory (it doesn't
    work quite so well in practice), you can program your LD player to
    watch the Original Version, the Special Edition, or a combination of
    both.

-- 

	"She's my radiation baby.
	 She's my teenage fallout girl."

--- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC, "The Mill", Maynard, MA)

    boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com
Organization: University Libraries - Library Automatio, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 15:12:34 -0400 
From: Christine Hogan <ch3c+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: *GREAT MOVIE ACTORS*
	<cosulliv.713652409@sfu.ca>

i vote for dennis quaid - big easy
mel gibson - in anything :->
|Chris Hogan                    |         1127                 |     
|ch3c+@andrew.cmu.edu           | Soft as the massacre of Suns |
|                               | By Evening's Sabres slain    |        
          
|CB-1                           |             emily dickinson  |  
                      
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: garrem@aix.rpi.edu (Matthew Olsen Garretson)
Subject: Re: Bruce Lee's son?
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 20:07:46 GMT

In article <1992Aug20.203257.4851@midway.uchicago.edu> fun5@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>Its been a pet peeve of mine that the martial arts
>and scientific developments are NEVER EVER portrayed accurately in the mass 
>media.

Agreed. But what *is* ever portrayed accurately in the mass media????  :) 
-- 
Matt Garretson                       :-)                          garrem@rpi.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Subject: Re: ** ULTIMATE CLASSIC MOVIE BABES ** Who?
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 03:21:14 GMT

In article <1992Aug18.193258.29547@sco.COM> maureenw@sco.COM (Maureen Wilkes) writes:
>In article <66102@hydra.gatech.EDU> ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz) writes:
>>
>>She's an ACTOR???  Holy shit, that's news to me.
>>Wait, or does PC now dictate that we call women actors so that it doesn't
>>sound sexist (kinda like calling women in the the military sir)?
>>
>
>
>As someone else posted (sorry, hit the magic "n" button and couldn't
>get it back!), the term "actor" is not gender specific...although it 

So if that's true, then why do we have this "chairman"/"chairperson"
stuff being debated?  It was supposed to be a generic use of the
male-type noun as the "general case".  So is it or isn't it?
I'm just interested in the general concensus on the net.

Keeping in mind that communication is supposed to strive for
efficiency, what is the high-runner WRT current sensitivities?

"Mailperson?  Walkperson? Bougy=Persony? Boyant=Personant?
Womanly=Personly?  Masculine=Feminine=Personine?"

It seems to me that the major problem with the established
pronouns was not the pronouns themselves, but the pre-existing
assumptions of the audience.  And after all, that's the major 
consideration of pretty much a major portion of all human affairs.

Let's be careful with our medium of communication, please.
It's very important.

GMS
From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: They Live - John Carpenter ???
Date: 17 Aug 92 14:03:53 GMT
Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU
Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH


gt4476a@prism.gatech.EDU (Mike Alberghini) writes of John CArpenter:

>     Memoirs of An Invisible Man.  John Carpenter flops again!  It made it
>about three weeks in theatres tops.  Maybe someday he will come out with a 
>good movie again.

I'll agree the movie as a whole was kind of weak (although I enjoyed it) 
but I thought the scenes near the beginning of the swiss-cheese building 
were wonderful!
-- 
   Brice Dowaliby, Fluent Inc., 10 Cavendish Court, Lebanon, NH  03766
                         bd%fluent@dartmouth.edu        
             I don't speak for them, they don't speak for me
From: maureenw@sco.COM (Maureen Wilkes)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Manon of the Spring (was something really stupid)
Date: 18 Aug 92 19:15:48 GMT
Organization: SCO Canada, Inc.

In article <1992Aug14.035500.511@syacus.acus.oz.au> steven@syacus.acus.oz.au (Steven Malikoff) writes:
>I hear that
>the (pretty good) Oz film 'The Year My Voice Broke' will be re-shot in
>the US, with US actors! ...I think that's going TOO far. Why do
>our movies have such poor acceptance overseas?
>

Well, I haven't seen "The Year My Voice Broke", but I'll hazard a guess
as to why the Americans would remake it:
                     audience appeal.

Typically, North American audiences are drawn to slick, big budget films
with slick, expensive actors.  Typically, Australian and other foreign 
films are lower budget (with the exception of Merchant/Ivory productions),
and rougher around the edges.  They have a "real" quality, as opposed to the
North American penchant for "larger than life".  So, I'm guessing that the
American producers figured that the story had appeal, but would reach a larger
audience if it could be "Hollywoodized".  You know, everyone's thin, tanned,
capped teeth, hair by Oribe, wardrobe by Armani (or J. Crew, if it's a teen
flick), no homes less than 6,000 sq. feet, expensive cars, blah, blah, blah.
Subtlety doesn't sell tickets.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rjf@cbnews.cb.att.com (robert.j.fredette)
Subject: Re: Macrovision
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 17:37:01 GMT
Summary: video monitors

In article <18838@nntp_server.ems.cdc.com>, ahummel@ems.cdc.com (H. Austin Hummel) writes:
> In article <smith.62@panther.adelphi.edu>, smith@panther.adelphi.edu (Jim Smith) writes:
> |> In article <BssDu1.9pv@news.udel.edu> roby@chopin.udel.edu (Scott W Roby) writes:
> Stuff left out:
> |> 
> |> Hey, why you wanna break copyright laws and deprive distributors of their 
> |> just income?  That's illegal.  "Federal law provides severe civil and 
> |> criminal penalties for the unauthorized reproduction bla-bla-bla."
> 
> On Macrovision, does anyone know what is available to get rid of that 
> garbage so one can watch a tape without the flag images on the top?


 Something I posted over a year ago may still hold true, so here it is.
--
   Some monitors eliminate macrovision protection nicely while doing
"transfers" using the VID IN and MON OUT circuits. Although my older Zenith
monitor does not eliminate the protection, a friend's NEC CT-2610A does a
great job when using it between VCRs.
-- 

 For what it's worth.

   No e-mail cause thats not me above,,,,this is me below.
********************************************************************************
             I STILL AM JMF              | Many thanks to RJF for making his    
  AT&T NETWORK SYS still on loan to BTL  | account available to me from time 
  in user's hell or is it, a user from   | to time. 
  hell, or is it a hell of a user??????  | Joe Fedenyszen       508-960-4566 
********************************************************************************
From: gorrindo@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Sue Gorrindo)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 19:41:57 GMT
Subject: Re: T2 Judgement Day date.
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

Yup, it was August 29 - I "think" it was 1998.
From: fwilliam@lab5.smcm.edu (Frank Williams)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Terminator
Date: 17 Aug 92 11:59:44 GMT

In article <1992Aug12.141619.5022@crpmks.uucp> billb@crpmks.uucp (Bill  
Bochnik (Info Systems)) writes:
> In article <1992Aug11.033945.13421@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz>  
craddock@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz (Craddock) writes:
> >fwilliam@lab5.smcm.edu (Frank Williams) writes:
> >One flaw that i can think off is the fact that Reese and the Arnie from  
the
> >second movie can not have ever met in the future.  Remember from the
> >terminator
> >Reese had to wait for the terminator to attempt to kill sarah so that
> >he could identify it.  Now if he had already seen the terminators twin  
then
> >why would he have to wait.  To a certain extent this is a flaw in T2 as  
well.
> >--
> 
> 
> Why is this a FLAW in the second movie.  I don't understand the  
reasoning...
> 
 I agree this is not a flaw.  Oh and by the way I did not write this part  
it was a follow up that someone added.  Just setting the record straight!

Frank Williams
From: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: manon of the spring (
Date: 20 Aug 92 19:55:37 EST
Reply-To: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

PR>The one interesting aspect of the American version of "The Vanishing"
PR>is that the same director is making the American version as did the
PR>Dutch version.  One rarely gets the chance to see what would happen if
PR>a director had a chance to remake his film.

     Sometimes it's better to leave well enough alone - look at Roger
     Vadim's remake of his own "And God Created Woman" for an example.
     :)
---
  SLMR 2.1a  Get out of the waves!  Get out of the water!
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dogar@rtsg.mot.com (Haroon H. Dogar)
Subject: Re: Ghandi (Was Re: terminator ii)
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 21:19:32 GMT

kaufman@eecs.nwu.edu (Michael L. Kaufman) writes:

>Speaking of which, there were quite a few "little" points left out of the film.
>For example, when Ghandi's wife lay dying of pneumonia and British doctors
>insisted that a shot of penicillin would save her, Ghandi refused to have this
>alien medicine injected in her body, and simply let her die. On the other hand,
>when shortly afterwards Ghandi contrtacting malaria, he accepted for himself
>the alien medicine quinine and when he had appendicitis, he allowed British 
>doctors to perform on him the alien outrage of an appendectomy (see Capturing 
>the Culture by Richard Grenier).

>Michael

As with many "historical" films, the end result is more fiction than fact.
*Ghandi* was an especially distorted view of history that was designed to
make Ghandi look perfect. The actual truth is always much more complex 
than the celluloid truth.

-hd
5 Rivers Gun and Hunt Club
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.humor,alt.sex,alt.sex.bondage,soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.asian.american,alt.parents-teens,alt.recovery,soc.men,soc.women,alt.polyamory,alt.wanted.moslem.gay
From: rdc@netcom.com (Rachel Dafni Christy)
Subject: Re: Woody and Mia
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 21:19:15 GMT
Organization: 'Ex-Biology Grad Student, Student of Life.
Keywords: thank heaven for little girls

greg@netcom.com (Greg Bullough) writes:
> 
>So for those of you who were wondering if there was any resemblence between
>his life and his movies...
> 
>(I wonder which came first?)

Probably Woody.


QUIZ.

Q: WHAT GOES INTO 7 TWICE?
A: WOODY ALLEN.

.

-- 
--
hugs, Rachel
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: craigs@garfield.cs.mun.ca (Betsy Brett)
Subject: Peter Lorre-Three Strangers?
Summary: Is this Three Strangers?
Keywords: Three Strangers?
Organization: CS Dept., Memorial University of Newfoundland
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 18:18:16 GMT


I am missing part of my video collection, including a film called "Three
Strangers" with Sydney Greenstreet, Peter Lorre and Geraldine Fitzgerald.
I remembered a piece of a Peter Lorre film I had, but cannot recall if it
is part of "Three Strangers" or not.  He plays a witness or alabi for a
man up on some sort of charges.  The gang are hiding him in an apartment
house with a suspicious landlady.  The female member of the gang is closest
to him.  He sneaks out of the apartment often to go to the bar.  I have looked
up various movie plots from his filmography, but none ring a bell.  Could
someone tell me if this is "Three Strangers" or if I am also missing another
Peter Lorre movie from my collection???  Thanks ever so!
	Also, if anyone has any Peter Lorre movies on video for sale, I may 
be interested.  Please email me any info.

-- 
Betsy Brett                          email craigs@garfield.cs.mun.ca
Box 442 RR1                          (specify to Betsy in subject line)
Paradise, NF  A1L 1C1 /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Canada /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder 432-4219)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Woody Allen / Mia Farrow
Keywords: This is *BIG* in NYC, and it's only just begun
Date: 19 Aug 92 21:08:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: hsdndev.1743
Organization: HMS

>.....
>>* Allen has admitted having a current affair with Soon-Yi
>>   Previn Farrow, whom Farrow adopted while married to Andre
>>   Previn.  Various reports have Soon-Yi anywhere between
>>   18 and 21 years old.  According to Allen, the affair has been
>>   going on for seven months.
>>   (Celeb divorce lawyer Raoul Felder has said that while this is 
>>    technically not incest, Allen certainly appears to have taken 
>>    advantage of his position.)

Maybe in NYC and HollyWood it's a big deal because it's Woody Allen
but in some rural parts of this country and some international
outposts it's part of life.(i.e. a middle-aged Father brings home a stepmother whose
age is the same as his oldest daughter who is finishing high school)
No big whoop,here. 

Actually,Soon-Yi is a good looking nice developed young female.
I would get attracted to her too if I was hanging out with a bitch like
Mia who will stop at nothing to get the custody of the kids.
She'll probably do the tabloid TV circuit and TV talk show route any
second now.
 
Woody is not blood-related to Soo-Yin. She's over 18 and is currently
enrolled into a University. So obviously she has some brain to decide
with whom she wants to have a romantic fling. This is her first and not
her last. This is his 999th and not his last. Good Luck Woody and Soon-Yi!

I'm not a fan of Woody's movies and probably won't even go to see his
next one which opens on Sept. 23. But this whole thing smells like a
custody battle played out by couple of celebrity divorce lawyers.

I don't approve or condone Allen's behavior,but the idiots in the
media outlets have nothing better to do on a boring day in August.

Before,I go,I'll ask all of you one question with a straight face :
How has the news of Paul Reubens beating off in a Florida X-rated movie
theater affected your daily life when you first heard about it?

-Mark
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies