HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: buckmr@vccsouth28.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire)
Subject: Re: Scorsese's Next Film -- An Edith Wharton adaption?
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 22:08:48 GMT

schweda@iastate.edu (Christopher Schweda) writes:


>I've just begun preliminary research for my upcoming doctral dissertation, and
>I have a question:

>There's been some talk about Scorsese's next film -- that it's an adaptation
>of an Edith Wharton novel. My question is this: what's the name of the
>novel? I ask because my dissertation will focus on filmic representations
>of American novels. The Wharton/Scorsese combination could prove to
>be the foundation of my entire dissertation.

The name of the novel is AGE OF INNOCENCE and it stars Daniel Day-Lewis,
Michelle Pfeiffer and Winona Ryder. It's budgeted at $40 million, according to 
PREMIERE. There is also another Edith Wharton in the works, this one with 
Jeremy Irons, I believe...[See latest Premiere]


-- 
RON BUCKMIRE, 11 Colvin Circle, Troy, NY 12180-3735. 
uunet!rpi.edu!buckmr||buckmr@rpitsmts.bitnet||buckmr@rpi.edu||+1 518 276 8910
"I could not do it nearly as well as Kate Bush, because she is a Goddess."
                                                            --Sinead O'Connor.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.food.drink
From: jordan@cs.tulane.edu (Misti Jordan)
Subject: Re: P.S. to SotL questions....
Nntp-Posting-Host-[nntpd-15294]: isis
Organization: Computer Science Dept., Tulane Univ., New Orleans, LA
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 17:19:32 GMT


In article <3024@cvbnetPrime.COM>, csroc@dime.prime.com (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2) writes:
> >To my comment that Lecter, as a gourmet of some reputation, would have
> >preferred the wine Amarone (as Harris, the author, has him doing) to Chianti
> >as an accompaniment to his meal of Pate de Census-taker Gras (OK, for the
> >pedants: Pate d'officiel du Recensement Gras....???...oh, forget it!) I
> >should add that Amarone as a much heavier red wine would be preferable to
> >the lighter Chianti when partaking of such a strong taste as liver.
>
> Joe,
>    All serious wine buffs understand the difference
> between Chianti and Amerone, however, methinks that
> at least 95% of the American public(and the world)
> has a much greater chnace of understanding the scene
> with Chianti in place of Amerone.  I hadn't really
> noticed (in the movie) that Lecter had a reputation
> as a gourmet!  If the point was stressed and I
> overlooked it, I would then agree that this is an
> obvious inconsistency.

Lecter was supposed to be known as a gourmet, which was kinda funny since
    he was also a cannibal! ;-) (I know this (about being a gourmet) from
    the book-- I'm not sure about the movie)...


Misti
From: rstevew@deeptht.santa-cruz.ca.us (Richard Steven Walz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Re; Censorship of Nudity
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 05:21:27 GMT
Distribution: us
Organization: The Armory

In article <702653666@macbeth.cs.duke.edu> kirk@cs.duke.edu (Scooter Corleone) writes:
>In article <4755@umriscc.isc.umr.edu> wdechent@usenet.umr.edu (William L.
>Dechen
>t) writes:
>>
>>       I'd like to see some discussion of how this issue reflects on
>>our culture.  The male penis is referred to so many times and yet it is
>>considered something to hide.  As a culture we consider ourselves an
>>improvement over our Puritan ancestors yet on this issue they still seem
>>to exercise a control of sorts.
--
>...I'd also like to see less sexual nudity. We've seen it all already, and
>I enjoy having sex much more than I enjoy watching other people do it. I
>also think it's much more exciting, for example, to see a woman in bed with
>the sheet up to her chin and know she's completely naked underneath than to
>see her completely naked and panting, and I think movies that allude to sex
>are much more exciting than today's more explicit and clinical displays.
>
>Scooter Corleone

Well Scooter, whatever sexuality you are ashamed of and wish they
wouldn't show so much of, we will accept in your place. You can cut
your dick off and leave it with us. We'll take better care of it.
(Why do some people even bother with alt.sex?????)  - Steve Walz
From: panda@syrinx.umd.edu (Lisa Nyman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Billy Crystal's Song at Oscars
Keywords: costumes
Date: 8 Apr 92 23:23:25 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

>In article <lis.702127605@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu> 
>lis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Elisabeth Riba) writes:
>
>>And wan't Geena
>>Davis' dress hideous?  

She gets my vote for ugliest dress at the Oscars.  This is surprising
since she looked great the past two years.

Susan Sarandon, however, looked great.

Gee, wasn't it great how they gave away the whole end of T&L?

-- 
Lisa Wolfisch Nyman         "Life is too short to wear ugly underwear."
panda@syrinx.umd.edu                    
Just remember, geographers do it in places unknown to the general public.
New from Dweeb Publishers: Memoirs of a Workstation Widow, Oh the Agony of It
From: randle@humu.NOSC.Mil (Mike Randle)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: ScriptWriter??????
Summary: Software Available
Keywords: Script
Date: 7 Apr 92 20:29:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: humu.636
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, Kaneohe Hawaii

I recently read of a software package called Collaborator which assists in 
formulating scripts.  It is supposed to include intelligence on dramatic
form.  I forget where I read about it (Entertainment Weekly?, maybe a
December issue?).  Sorry for the imprecision - I read it at a doctor's
office recently.  Also, read Screenplay by Syd Field.
From: csroc@dime.prime.com (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Avalon: Awards/Nominations?
Date: 13 Apr 92 13:52:44 GMT
Reply-To: csroc@dime.UUCP (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Organization: Prime Computervision, Bedford MA

>>I'm pretty sure that all it got was a Best Original Screenplay nomination,
>>which it didn't win.  I'm 99% sure that Mueller-Stahl wasn't up...
>>I haven't seen AVALON yet.  Is it good?

Avalon was indeed a very, very enjoyable movie.  For many
of the 40-50 year olds on the net...it was almost a lesson
in nostalgia.  Grandparents who came from Eastern Europe on
the boat...the Uncles who argued over the most ridiculous 
things...the big family gatherings...moving out of the 
inner city to the country...the men do men's work and women
stay at home(so never go with a women driver)attitude.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: winicur@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Zev Winicur)
Subject: Re: Who's Spider-Man? and Highlander wanted
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date:  7 Apr 92 02:55:11 GMT

RHK106@psuvm.psu.edu writes:

>Everyone probably knows about the Spider-Man movie that James Cameron is
>gonna do but if anyone can find a better actor to play Spider-Man than Keanu
>Reeves, you gotta tell me.


How about Robby Benson?  He would be good at playing a bookish type but he
isn't too geeky looking and he has a very impressive voice (Beauty and the 
Beast).  IMHO a much better actor than Reeves or Schwarzenegger.




_______     __   ,     _____/  *
      |       \       /  |     *  Zev Winicur
      |        \         |     *  winicur@beagle.colorado.edu
______|_    |   \        |     *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: andre@rurutu.wri.com (Andre Kuzniarek)
Subject: Re: Thunderheart
Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 21:05:17 GMT

I saw one of those public television (Chris Stoner (?)) movie people  
interview snippets with Val Kilmer. He explains that he himself is part  
Native American. He says it was import to the film makers that the issues  
it adresses be represented accurately and sincerely. 

Isn't Robert DeNiro one of the producers?

--andre@wri.com-----------------------------------------------------------
                      "I'm tired of keepin' my cookies in the cookie jar."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: kevin@taronga.taronga.com (Kevin Brown)
Subject: Undubbed version of Mad Max
Reply-To: kevin@taronga.taronga.com (Kevin Brown)
Organization: Minimal.
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 06:03:30 GMT

I'm sure this question's been asked before, but it's not in the FAQ and
it hasn't been in any of the articles in the past few weeks that I've
seen.  So here goes:

WHERE can one get an UNDUBBED version of Mad Max?  You know, the version
*without* the stupid Americanized voices?  The one with the *original*
*unmodified* soundtrack.

The only version I've *ever* seen here in the States is the dubbed version.

Can the undubbed version be gotten in Australia?  Is it possible to get
one from there in a VHS format that a standard VHS type VCR in the U.S.
would understand?  There might be video compatibility problems between
machines here in the States and those in Australia...

				Thanks,

				Kevin Brown

Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:14105 alt.cult-movies:4233
From: dgg@llcn2.jhuapl.edu (Dave Gawron)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Buckaroo Banzai (was Darkman - Crap)
Date: 17 Apr 92 16:58:03 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Johns Hopkins University

In <HgucJB1w164w@bluemoon.rn.com> orson@bluemoon.rn.com (Craig Smith) writes:

>>>Frankly, I was very dissapointed at BB, because the humor in it was
>>>told three levels deep.  That is to say, they were telling inside
>>>jokes without having already established an inside!

>>Or maybe you just missed it! Every time I see it again I pick up on some new
>>references or connections in the story.

>That's exactly my point! The reference could only have been
>understood if viewed more than once!  I wouldn't have understood a
>lot of them had I not read the comic before I saw the movie! THAT'S
>what I mean by telling an inside joke before you have an inside!

So, what you are saying is that because the movie didn't spoon feed every
joke to the audience it was a disappointment? (I'm being the devil's advocate
here ;-)  I don't consider having to see a movie more than once to get all
the references as a handicap on the movie's part.  It just gives the movie
the ability to keep delivering new meaning even after repeated viewings!


-Dave-
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: nyberg@ms.uky.edu (Jack Nyberg)
Subject: TALK OF THE TOWN
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:52:03 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
X-Bytes: 

   Has anyone seen TALK OF THE TOWN with Cary Grant and Ronald Coleman(?) ?

   I consider this drama/comedy one of the best films ever made.  I remember
taking a film criticism class a couple of semesters ago with a really good
teacher.  After class one day I got to talking with him about how he selected
the films that he showed that semester.  He gave me his criterion, and then
mentioned that he considered showing TALK OF THE TOWN as well as 
THEY WERE EXPENDABLE but eventually decided against it.  Instead he showed
LE FEMME NIKITA and HIGH AND LOW among others.

   Both LE FEMME NIKITA and HIGH AND LOW were excellent, but I can't help
but to imagine what it would have been like if he would have shown
TALK OF THE TOWN and THEY WERE EXPENDABLE instead.  I love these movies, but
I realize that I'm in the minority when it comes to older movies, and it
would have been interesting to see how these great films would translate
to some of the students who may have never seen these films before.  Oh well
the saddest words in song and voice are, "What might have been..."

                   
                                                         Jac 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: falkenha@ug.cs.dal.ca (Craig R. Falkenham)
Subject: Re: Palance's Acceptance Speech
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 16:45:39 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.152512.4321@panix.com> tkelsey@panix.com (Tom Kelsey) writes:
>In article <1992Apr2.121550.12358@cs.joensuu.fi> jpehko@cs.joensuu.fi (Juha Pehkonen) writes:
>>levin@star-trek.bbn.com (Joel B Levin) writes:
>>>Well, as Arnie might say, he'll be back.  According to tradition that
>>>Whoopi pointed out, the winner of best supporting actor comes back to
>>>present the best supporting actress award the following year.
>>
>>that is if he lives to do it! :-) yeah i know, bad joke

>>Juice

>NO only the BEST Actor, Actress. return, NOT the supporting actors

Sorry, but they're right.  The Best Supporting Actress & Actor (usually)
return the following year to give the Best Supporting Actress & Actor
oscar.

Craig R. Falkenham

Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:13891 alt.horror:1593
From: dkrause@miami.acs.uci.edu (Doug Krause)
Subject: Re: Naked Blondes in Living Dead Films (was Re: Review: SLEEPWALKERS)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.horror
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Keywords: review, sleepwalkers, horror, phantom
Date: 15 Apr 92 09:12:29 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.173620.2706@watdragon.waterloo.edu> jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll) writes:
#	Hmmm. Didn't 'Return of the Living Dead' have an entirely 
#gratuitious bit of nudity by the allegedly red haired woman (Trash, I
#think her name was)? I seem to recall her bouncing through the film with
#few clothes

The wonderful Linnea Quigley if I remember correctly...

Douglas Krause                      One yuppie can ruin your whole day.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
University of California, Irvine    Internet: dkrause@orion.oac.uci.edu
Welcome to Irvine:  Yuppieland USA  BITNET: DJKrause@uci.edu
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: THUNDERHEART
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:55:23 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Apr15.152959.6903@watdragon.waterloo.edu>, jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll) writes:
> In article <1992Apr15.100031.5402@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> leeper@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Mark R. Leeper) writes:
> >
> >This conversation is starting to get into real trivia.  My impression
> >is that deer tend to stick to wild areas and stay away from settled
> >areas.  Particularly because that was not a highly-settled area, it
> >would probably be unusual to see a deer that close to buildings.
> 
> 	Deer have a brain roughly the size of a gumball, so they sometimes

I guess I'm a little curious as to the actual utility of having the
magical power to change into something with a brain the size of a
gumball, but that's just me.  However, judging from what I hear people
say and see them do, it seems to be a rather common ability.

GMS
From: mc3d+@andrew.cmu.edu (Mary Rose Campbell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jabberwoky (?)
Date: 16 Apr 92 04:40:20 GMT
	<1992Apr15.152114.20106@mlb.semi.harris.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Fifth yr. senior, Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


 luoni@bosco.mlb.semi.harris.com (Perry Luoni) writes :

>Jabberwoky is a Monty Python movie.  

Not exactly.  It was directed by either/both Terry Jones and Terry
Gilliam, and I believe Michael Palin was in it (I'm not sure, though). 
It was made around 1977 or so.  I saw it on tape about 8 or 10 years
ago, so I really can't say much about it.  It's OK, but not up to the
usual level of the people involved.

mrc
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: stailey@hawkeye.comm.mot.com (Mike Stailey)
Subject: Re: Revenge of the Jedi
Reply-To: stailey@hawkeye.comm.mot.com
Organization: Motorola Land Mobile Products Sector
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 17:38:11 GMT

(Bill Ung) writes:
 
* As many of you know, the movies "Return of the Jedi" and "Star Trek II:The
* Wrath of Khan" were originally titled "Revenge of the Jedi" and "Star Trek
* II: The Revenge of Khan".  That is, until the movie studios saw the
* similarity and decided one of them had to change.  Both ended up changing.


  Actually, director Nick Myer's original name for Star Trek II was...

  "Star Trek II: The Undiscovered Country". And one of the early drafts
  
  of the script didn't even have Khan in the movie.


  --
  Michael                      
  stailey@hawkeye.comm.mot.com     


Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:13185 rec.arts.sf.movies:3089
From: v562f9vy@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Wolverine)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Jennifer Connelly
Keywords: Jennifer Connelly, Walt Disney
Date: 7 Apr 92 10:06:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr6.143528.21723@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, dnaraghi@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Dara Naraghi) writes...
>In article <1992Apr3.213535.23560@cs.cornell.edu> parekhs@cs.cornell.edu (Sujay S. Parekh) writes:
>>Hello, movie-lovers!! Those of you who have seen Rocketeer might
>>remember the heroine Jennifer Connelly. One of my friends has an
>>incredible crush on her, and I was wondering how to find out her
>>address? Would Walt Disney studios tell me if I asked?
> 
>	I think the answer to that question is "Hell no!".  However, you
>can always send her a fan letter in care of the Disney studio.
> 
>>Also, out of curiosity, has she appeared in other movies?
> 
>	I've seen her in two other movies, Career Opportunities and
>The Hot Spot (she has a very short nude scene in this one).  I really
>liked CO, even though it was kind of a goofy comedy.  The Hot Spot
>kinda' sucked though, unless of course you watch it for reasons other
>than the story :-)
> 
>-- 
>*****************************************************************************
>* Dara Naraghi                       * "Love isn't really blind...just      *
>* dnaraghi@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu *  selectively nearsighted"--The Hulk  *
>*****************************************************************************





she also appeared in Labyrinth with David Bowie.



                                       Wolverine
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies
From: mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Ed McCreary)
Subject: Re: Jennifer Connelly
Keywords: Jennifer Connelly, Walt Disney, warlord-able sigs
Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 14:44:42 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.133927.17989@uunet!tellab5!odgate> teg@uunet!tellab5!odgate (Todd Grinnell) writes:
>parekhs@cs.cornell.edu (Sujay S. Parekh) writes:
>
>Harv@cup.portal.com (Harv R Laser) also writes re JC:
>>Ms. Connelly appear in a recent film called "The Hot Spot"
>>with Don Johnson of Miami Vice fame... in this film she does
>>some nude or topless scenes.
>
>Alas, no. :-) The rollerskating scene in Career Opportunity comes close,
>though. 
>

Actually, there is a brief topless scene in _Hot Spot_.

--
McCreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com     Computers are like Old Testament gods;
Me? Speak for Compaq?  Yeah, right.   lots of rules and no mercy.
                                                             Joseph Campbell
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Ed McCreary)
Subject: Re: Who's Spider-Man? and Highlander wanted
Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 18:33:02 GMT

In article <1992Apr12.220229.20929@wri.com> andre@rurutu.wri.com (Andre Kuzniarek) writes:
>In article <1992Apr11.224755.27733@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>  
>sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter) writes:
>> Hmmm...interesting.  Of course, just about any of these candidates are
>> better choices than the actor that Cameron will be using, IMHO.
>
>What exactly _is_ Cameron's fascination with Michael Biehn. Is MB JC's  
>alter ego, did MB save Cameron's life in a war, or what? I mean, this is,  
>as you say, extending into perilous miscasting...
>

Some directors tend to work with the same actor.  Looks at Scorcese and
Deniro.  

--
McCreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com     Computers are like Old Testament gods;
Me? Speak for Compaq?  Yeah, right.   lots of rules and no mercy.
                                                             Joseph Campbell
From: fajack@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: another oscar question
Date: 6 Apr 92 15:04:01 MDT
Distribution: na
Organization: Utah State University

In article <wood.702564495@jfred>, wood@jfred.siemens.com (Jim Wood) writes:
> buckmr@marcus.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire) writes:
> 
>>kho@athena.mit.edu (Karen W Ho) writes:
> 
>>>Just wondering...I've never figured out who traditionally gives out each big
>>>award. (Last year's best actress presents oscar to this year's best actor-???)
>>>Anyone, anyone?
> 
>>Yes, last year's Best Actor gives out this year's BEST ACTRESS and last year's
>>BEST ACTRESS gives out this year's BEST ACTOR. Similar thing happens with 
>>BEST SUPPORTING.
> 
> ... Except that there are always exceptions to this rule.  Jeremy Irons
> was last year's best actor winner, but Michael Douglas presented best
> actress this year.  The other three winners from last year (Kathy Bates,
> Joe Pesci, Whoopi Goldberg), did however present the traditional awards.

	The reason Jeremy Irons was not present is because he is filming
in Europe and was unable to present the Best Actress award. (I read about
this in some newspapers).   The tradition is always last year best
actress give out best actor award and best actor gives out best actress award
and so on.

Jack Teh


> 
> Last year, all 4 winners from 1989 presented the awards (Daniel Day Lewis,
> Jessica Tandy, Denzel Washington, Brenda Fricker).  I can't recall an
> Oscar year in which all 4 previous winners did this.
> 
> Jim Wood [wood@siemens.siemens.com] (609) 734-3643
>   "Even if complaints about man-bashing in this film were 99% true, it still
>    wouldn't make up for the years of portraying women as bimbos in movies."
>      - Geena Davis, about "Thelma & Louise"
From: jhfrome@amherst.edu
Subject: Re: T2 soundtrack
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA.
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 03:35:02 GMT

In article <sjl7rINN89g@seven-up.East.Sun.COM>, joneil@heretix.East.Sun.COM (John O'Neil - SunExpress IR) writes:

> is there a soundtrack for the movie T2?????

	Yes.
 
> is it good?????

	YES. It is over 53 minutes and it is excellent. Unless, of course, you
are looking for Guns and Roses instead of quality percussion-oriented 
composition by Brad Fidel, in which case you'd be dissapointed.

-- 
................................................................................
	JHF			|  "It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a 
	jhfrome@amherst.edu  	|   bigger man to laugh at that man" 
				|			- Jack Handey
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: storm@cs.mcgill.ca (Marc WANDSCHNEIDER)
Subject: Re: DUNE...A minor classic?
Organization: McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 00:06:59 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.133650.1480@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> dnadams@isis.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams) writes:
>
>nyberg@ms.uky.edu (Jack Nyberg) writes:
>
> >I just rented David Lynch's DUNE this weekend.  I had seen it when 
> >it was originally released and remember that I was disappointed.
>
>I *loved* it when I saw it the first time, and I still do now...

	When I first saw it, I was rather young, and found it terribly gross,
and just not fun to watch.  However, now when I watch it, I find myself amazed
at just how complete everything is, and how generally well done it is...

>That is how i've always felt about it.  A VERY compelling film.
>All the people who said they "couldn't understand it" are the ones 
>I don't understand...  I had no problems at all following things.

	I only fully understood it after the second time I watched it or so,
and after that, I just keep catching new things that I previously missed.

>I considered it a "classic" right from the very beginning...

	Gnarly film fer shur.  I'd rank it up there with Highlander II, 
Ernest Scared Stupid, and Batman (NOT).

	I have it on the same videotape as I have LEGEND (Tom Cruise and Mia
Sara) -- pretty much two of my favorite movies of all time....


-- 
  storm@cs.mcgill.ca           McGill University         C program run.  Run  
  Marc Wandschneider           Montreal, CANADA          Program run! PLEASE!
Ever wonder how Worf got to be Security Officer on the Enterprise when the 
Capt gets kidnapped from the bridge every two episodes and Troy Beats him up?