HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: Help stop the KKK
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 04:12:04 GMT


In article <1992Apr12.005706.3189@amhux2.amherst.edu>
twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

>The KKK's platform has already been heard.  It does not warrant
>further patience.

As others have pointed out, they are not free to do just
anything.  But they are free to speak, and patience does not
have a role in that freedom.  Hateful as they are, I'd
rather they kept their freedom of speech than to lose mine
too, and curtailing theirs would inevitably curtail mine.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: bn566@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Ward Chanley)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: OUT/LOOK S.O.S.
Date: 7 Apr 92 04:11:25 GMT
Article-I.D.: usenet.1992Apr7.041125.29508
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)


Not OUT/LOOK, but I do have Outweek
info...

I remember an article a while ago in 
the ADVOCATE (shortly before M.
Signorile signed on to ADVOCATE) that
the troubles at Outweek were partly
monetary; the magazine failed to post a 
profit...and political; there was a 
radical faction that wanted the 
mag to stay true to its roots in
the NY street-actvist scene, and
moderates who felt that the mag was
too closely associated with both Queer
Nation and the outing scandal, and
who urged a more conservative ed-
itorial stance...

All of the infighting took time,
money and effort away from keeping 
a troubled ship afloat.
-- 
"Imagine a war in which everyone won..."
Pet Shop Boys, "DJ Culture"
-----------------------------------------
Ward Chanley - bn566@cleveland.freenet.edu
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: What Mara Missed!
Date: 11 Apr 92 18:45:25 GMT
Article-I.D.: macc.1992Apr11.184525.4082
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison


In article <57182@cup.portal.com> Furr@cup.portal.com
(George Dalton Madison) furrows his bushy brows and writes:

>Jess Anderson writes:

>>Rather, Ry risks ruining his reputation by revealing relaxed
>>what really racy reprobates here relished reviewing rigid.

>We've already *DONE* alliteration.  ;-)

Gosh darn, Mary, we get damned mixed up going down memory
lane, grabbing dated means of garnering dish and mirth.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: exotica@milton.u.washington.edu (Tsilke Pearlman)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: London in July? NOT, sorry.
Summary: San Fransisco in late August, instead.
Date: 8 Apr 92 18:39:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Apr8.183920.11671
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

Gotta see family, instead (not such a bad deal, family inF, eh?).
So can someone clue me to the exact dates of the Folsom Street Fair?
(Family and pleasure, doncha' know...)

Tsilke
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: Heterosexual Exploitation of Homosexuality?
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 00:52:36 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.213208.20284@reed.edu> nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.220028.3575@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> jfh@greenber.austin.ibm.com (John F Haugh II) writes:
>>This is nonsense - if the actors in these films are being paid a fair
>>wage for their efforts, no one is being exploited.  Sounds more like
>>you guys are jealous you aren't making the big buck$ working as a porn
>>star ...
>
>This paragraph, more than any other thing you have said on this forum,
>indicates that you really have absolutely *no* comprehension of gay
>culture.

Culture, period, gay or no.  Presumably Dick Roundtree got paid fair
wages for SHAFT, and similarly with the infamous film SUPERFLY; hence
there's no such thing as blaxploitation.  Right.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Someone here suggested blue square badges for
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  straights.  Maybe we should try mauve
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  heptagons?" - Damian Cugley, on soc.bi
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: twpierce@amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Ann Landers
Date: 27 Mar 92 15:27:02 GMT
Followup-To: soc.motss
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA.

In article <17688@awdprime.UUCP>, jfh@greenber.austin.ibm.com (John F Haugh II) writes:

> Likewise, if some brain scan or hormone
> test is ever able to reveal homosexuality in the womb, homosexuals
> will be the first to line up on the pro-life side of the abortion
> debate, probably even before Christians and Conservatives ...

I think that's pretty absurd, and I'm curious to know how you
came to that conclusion.  I think that a lot of people who
consider themselves pro-choice would be horrified to imagine
aborting a fetus because of its gender or sexual orientation.

T, testing a new newsfeed and reader

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Well, there's homosexuality in all animals
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  but one, and that's the pig. If it weren't
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  for homosexuals, we'd all have to live like
                                  pigs."  - overheard at Sydney Mardi Gras
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: buckmr@marcus.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire)
Subject: Re: Maurice
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 05:54:30 GMT

dickson@nevada.edu (JON THUMIM) writes:

>I just saw the most wonderful movie.  It is entitled "Maurice" and is
>an adaptation of E M Forester's novel.  I highly recommend this movie
>to thoughs of you who have yet to see it.  It is a very romantice
>movie, IMHO.

I think it is really cool that a gay couple, Merchant and Ivory can go around
making these kinds of movies and win Oscars and critical acclaim for it. So
far they have done, what  three E.M. Forster novels...

A ROOM WITH A VIEW (1986)
MAURICE (1988)
HOWARD'S END (1992)

I think between Maurice and Howard's End thye did the horrific SLAVES OF NEW
YORK based on the Tama Janowitz novel.

>Do any of you know of any similar movies?
Lots. :-)


-- 
RON BUCKMIRE, 11 Colvin Circle, Troy, NY 12180-3735. 
vox:(518)-276-8910 fax:(518)-276-6920 buckmr@rpi.edu buckmr@rpitsmts.bitnet
"Birth Control is disgusting--people using each other for pleasure."
                               Randall Terry, Chairman, Operation Rescue.
Newsgroups: soc.motss,soc.bi
From: rhiann@milton.u.washington.edu (Sandra Hereld)
Subject: Re: Evolutionary reason for homo/bisexuality?
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 19:09:21 GMT

In article <xrpjqmj.rich@netcom.com> rich@netcom.com (Richard Poppen) writes:
>Recently I've found myself speculating on a question that,
>surprisingly, I haven't seen discussed here:  What is the evolutionary
>reason for homo- and bisexuality?
>
>I am not asking "What causes homosexuality in an individual?" 
>I'm asking about the tendency or capacity for homosexuality in groups
>
>* A clan with some adult non-parents fares better because they tend to
>act as "parents-at-large", being able to work more for the clan's
>benefit rather than in a more narrowly defined family unit's benefit.

There is a named theoriy close to this one (I've forgotten the name.)
It goes like this:  If I have children, each child I have passes 50%
of my genes.  But if My sibs have kids, it still passes 25% of my
genes (so there is still a payoff for me to help my sibs kids,)And
the chance of those genes getting passed on with 3 adults to help may
be better than the chance of 50% getting passed with just 2 adults
to pass it on.  
For those quibling (sp?) about the 25% genes in common with sibs,
Think of it another way.  The parents have x kids, some of them
homosexual, incresing the odds of the parents having grandchildren.
>
>* Altruism is a behavior that helps a clan.  People are somewhat more
>likely to exhibit altruistic behavior toward those to whom they are
>sexually attracted; bisexual inclination therefore helps activate
>altruism.

As long as the clan that you are talking about is closely related.
The current (after all, there are fads in science too) thinking on
altruism seems to be that it only works in genetic groups where the
animals being altruistic are helping other animals with a large
percentage of shared genes.  So it can be looked on as a way of
increasing the number of your genes that continue, even though you
don't - it's like winning the race and expiring on the finish line.
>
>* A tendency to homosexuality is linked with a higher sex drive in
>general, leading bisexual males to have more offspring than strictly
>heterosexual males.
>
How does this thought affect bi women...

>* Sexuality cements pair-bonding, which is of great survival value, and
>the presence of homo- and bisexual people allows a clan to pair up more
>effectively when one sex is depleted for some reason.  Thus when male
>M1 and female F1 have children, and (say) M1 dies, and F1 pairs up with
>female F2, F1's ability to have a motss partner helps her existing
>offspring survive.
>
I like this, and I've never seen anything in the literature, one
way or the other...

>* A tendency to homo/bisexuality is inseparably linked to intelligence.
>(I like this one. :-)
>
Yeah, right, me too  #8^)

>Any comments?
>
>--Rich
>

Sandy                          Queer by Nature, Loud by Choice
From: portuesi@tweezers.esd.sgi.com (Michael Portuesi)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Exercise (Was Re: anyone know anything about laundry?)
Date: 6 Apr 92 23:13:25 GMT
Reply-To: portuesi@tweezers.esd.sgi.com (Michael Portuesi)
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

In article <j7htcug@fido.asd.sgi.com>, Jeff Dauber writes:
>portuesi@tweezers.esd.sgi.com (Michael Portuesi) writes:
>>>but I loathe gym-type exercise. [...] Does anyone out there
>>>have any suggestions for what I can do?
>>
>>Rollerblades, hon.  It's the new hip-trendy fag thing to
>>do...
>
>How about having energetic, raucous sex for 2 hours every
>evening?

Well, I spent a lot of time trying to top this idea, but I
simply can't.

So...when should I stop by?

m.

Michael Portuesi   Silicon Graphics, Inc.   portuesi@sgi.com
Xref: sparky soc.motss:19256 soc.bi:4139
Newsgroups: soc.motss,soc.bi
Subject: Re: ST:TNG Quotable Quote
From: mike@batpad.lgb.CA.US (Mike Batchelor)
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 92 23:29:43 PDT
Organization: The Batchelor Pad

dross@cambizola.cs.wisc.edu (Dan Ross) writes:

> On last week's episode, there were all those tense scenes between Wesley and
> his squadron leader, Nick...and they both had 'dos that just screamed...

Ooooo, didn't they, though?  Wes' fake Star-Fleet-pointy-sideburns were
NOT very becoming though.

> But, EVERYONE must have noticed that line that the female commander (or 
> whatever her rank was) who presided over the hearings (the one they 
> called "Sir") asked of one of the cadets with regards to fighter craft
> formation:
> 
> "You were traveling at over 80 k.p.h. only 10 meters from Cadet Stuart, and
>  you didn't even know his orientation?!!"

That's Admiral Brand, 80,000 k.p.h., Cadet Albert, not Stuart, and yes,
I know the orientation of at least one of the actors! :)

I loved that line too, and let go a gale of laughter.



[] ---
[] Mike Batchelor -- mike@batpad.lgb.CA.US -- cerritos.edu!batpad!mike
[] Long Beach, California
[] TNG Quote: "You were travelling in close formation at over 80,000 kph, only
[] 10 meters from Cadet Albert, and you didn't even know his orientation?!?"
From: gnn@wsl.dec.com (George Neville-Neil)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: outing the stars
Date: 16 Apr 92 17:32:06 GMT
Reply-To: gnn@wsl.dec.com (George Neville-Neil)
Organization: DEC Western Software Lab

In article <1992Apr14.151443.17283@tc.cornell.edu>, shore@dinah.tc.cornell.edu (Melinda Shore) writes:
|> Anyway, Unix is a dandy way to meet women.
|> -- 

Much in the same way that Usenix is a great way to meet men :-)  Ah yes, Computer Science, the hair dressing of the 90s !!

Later,
George


-- 
Excuse me, could you scream just a little louder ??  I can't seem to hear
you.
From: huxtable@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Kathryn Huxtable)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Heinlein & Who Are Vincent's Three?78868
Date: 14 Apr 92 17:06:46 CDT
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

In article <1992Apr10.190753.10155@csrd.uiuc.edu>, hsu@sp24.csrd.uiuc.edu
    (William Tsun-Yuk Hsu) writes:
> No. The Jewels of Aptor was first (there may have been revised editions
> which were dated after the trilogy). 

You're right, of course.  I was going by my memory which is
more fallible than people I work with could possibly
believe.  ("Go ask Kathryn, she'll know....")

> Delany's writing changed (i.e., improved tremendously) with the third
> book of the trilogy.

That's the truth.  I *still* like the four armed boy in _The
Jewels of Aptor_, though.

I also like the Neveryon books and _Stars in My Pockets Like
Grains of Sand_.  I eagerly await its sequel, _The Splendor
and Misery of Bodies, of Cities_.

-- 
Kathryn Huxtable              \   "Women who laugh too much, and the women
huxtable@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu   /\   who love them." --- Jamie Anderson
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: A Queen's English (was: Depressing Scumpits?)
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 23:37:49 GMT


In article <92102.123838SECBH@CUNYVM.BITNET>
<SECBH@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:

>There is a beneficial economy to an accent in which all vowels are
>pronounced as nasal a's.

With the added useful feature of making it easy to bark back
at noisy dogs.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: apm@hpopd.pwd.hp.com (Andrew Merritt)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 11:01:35 GMT
Subject: Re: Derek Jacobi's Shtick (was Re: Turing and "The Machine that changed the world")
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NSG-PWD, UK.
Newsgroups: soc.motss

On the off-chance that anyone is holding their breath for this, my sister
assures me, after dredging 14 year old memories, that Derek Jacobi's Hamlet
did not have a stammer.  She wasn't very impressed, though.

Andrew
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: jns@wam.umd.edu (J. N. Shaumeyer)
Subject: Re: Murdering Adonis
Organization: University of Maryland
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 19:05:34 GMT


Deborah Swayne (dfs@lestat.bellcore.com) wrote:
 
> Mara Chibnik (mara@panix.com) wrote:
> 
> [jns actually wrote this bit:]
> |>  >The rest of what you said is quite correct, as I'm 
> |>  >discovering.  It struck me that this is the sort of
> |>  >book which, if it were a movie, might gain consensus
> |>  >as the sort more of which we would like to see:
> |> Not to turn to far from your point, but:  Just how would you go
> |> about casting Hilary?  I think you'd spoil something quite
> |> wonderful.
> 
> I must assume that you are referring to one of my favorite things
> about all of the books about this lively crew (I've read three now):
> Hilary's gender is meticulously not specified, as far as I can tell.

[I'll bet Mara didn't want to give this away, but I don't
 think it spoils anything--it's so well-done that it's 
 hardly noticable.]

My original point was not necessarily that this book *should*
be a movie, rather that it's treatment of the sexuality of
its characters is a marvelous example of the sort we might 
hope for in movies and television.

Nevertheless, while we're on the subject, Debby's suggestions:

> Somehow Hilary
> would have to be in the movie only as a voice, or the back of a head
> or something.  It would be quite a challenge.

were much like my own thoughts.  It seemed that Hilary would
have to be the POV of the camera, as it were, and the voice
for narration could be warm, sensual, and androgynous.  Still
it would be a challenge, and might get tiresome very quickly.
On the other hand, done skillfully, it could become just as
unnoticable as the gender of the narrator in the book.

--jns
From: mara@panix.com (Mara Chibnik)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Too Sexy for My Love?
Date: 10 Apr 92 09:57:39 GMT
Organization: (getting there)

jns@wam.umd.edu (J. N. Shaumeyer) writes:
 
 >Mara Chibnik (mara@panix.com) consoles:
  >> ...Greg is certainly most delightful to behold.  Literally tall, dark
  >> and handsome.  But then, also from my perspective, Steve is much
  >> more my choice to look upon.  What can I say?
 >How about: "Mara looks after Mr. Dyer, while Jeff sees
 >to the comfort of Mr. [Looks-Brains-Beauty] Parkinson"?

Sounds like a lovely time to me.  May we bring our SOs?

-- 

  Mara Chibnik
  mara@panix.com                Life is too important to be taken seriously.
From: roger@quantime.co.uk (Roger Phillips)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Peter Greenaway fags (was Re: Basic Instinct protests)
Date: 2 Apr 92 12:15:41 GMT
Reply-To: roger@quantime.co.uk (Roger Phillips)
Organization: Quantime Ltd, London (software for market research)

In article <1992Apr1.061420.27070@reed.edu>,
nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:
> >>David Carlton says:
> >>>...a few weeks before I'd seen _A Zed and Two
> >>>Noughts_ and _Drowning by Numbers_, both of which I thought were
> >>>screams.
> 
> Curious, I found Drowning by Numbers fairly boring...

I survived by watching it on video
and keeping track of the numbers on a piece of paper.

> My favourite Greenaway is still The Cook, the Thief, his Wife, and her Lover.

One of my friends was an extra leaning on a grand piano,
briefly glimpsed during a dolly shot.

> Someone else asked about the dancer who played Caliban in "Prospero's Books".

I support the *idea* of Michael Clark,
but, curiously, I find him utterly sexless.

-- 
Roger Phillips                            roger@quantime.co.uk
"The Tempest is one of Shakespeare's more boring films" - Nelson Minar
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Wednesday, 8 Apr 1992 13:43:05 EDT
From: Ailsa N.T. Murphy <IO81409@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Your Hair...
 <7ykjj8q.onr@netcom.com> <1992Apr6.203952.23254@csrd.uiuc.edu>

tane writes:

>Am I the only person who does (in) their own hair?  Right now
>t's about three inches long all over, brown at the roots,
>blonde in the middle, orange at the tips, and permed in such a
>way to have it stand up in spikes.  I do a few other people's
>hair too, though you'd think they would know better after seeing
>ome of the ways mine can look.

>Gee, what a self-serving message!  I guess all I can do now is
>say that if I ever stopped torturing my hair then I'd basically
>fit Ailsa's list ... tall green-eyed vegetarian et al ... :-)

oooooh!  i LOOOVE creatively colored hair!  when can i move in?

                             -ailsa

p.s. creative hair coloring didn't make the list, as i don't know
anyone who does that, so i forgot that people do...  but i find it
very sexy...
From: mara@panix.com (Mara Chibnik)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Too Sexy for My Love?
Date: 6 Apr 92 20:32:57 GMT
Organization: (getting there)

dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) writes:
 glp@fig.citib.com (Greg Parkinson) writes:
  >>I am uncomfortable around people who are more attractive than I am.
 >Gad, and here I'm still congratulating myself that I hit it off _so
 >well_ with Greg "Mr. Looks/Brains/Beauty" Parkinson.  I thought it was
 >my wit.  :-|

Steve, how _could_ you think such a thing?  [do we have a wicked
smiley, very, *very* snide?]

From my perspective (am I turning tables again?  I guess so; sorry)
Greg is certainly most delightful to behold.  Literally tall, dark
and handsome.  But then, also from my perspective, Steve is much
more my choice to look upon.  What can I say?  If I had my druthers
I'd get to see them both at once-- and frequently, too.

  >>If you are convinced that someone loves you, the feeling that they
  >>will judge you and find you wanting goes away.  Show him how you feel,
  >>and give him some time.
 >Well put.
Amen.  

-- 

  Mara Chibnik
  mara@panix.com                Life is too important to be taken seriously.
From: michelle@rlgvax.Reston.ICL.COM (Michelle Elliott)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Heinlein & Who Are Vincent's Three?
Date: 9 Apr 92 12:35:49 GMT
Reply-To: michelle@rlgvax.Reston.ICL.COM (Michelle Elliott)
Organization: International Computers Limited, Reston, Virginia, USA

Well, I don't know about the three, but I just found
a new one last night -- Thomas Disch.  I haven't
heard much of him lately, but he's pretty well-known.

In the Atlantic magazine, Disch had written a critique
of modern SF.  His discussion of William Burroughs
(whose SF credentials I am unfamiliar with) was
considered homophobic by a reader whose letter appeared
in their Letters section.

Disch's response (among other things he said) --

       ...I am "admittedly gay" myself...

("admittedly gay" was the term the reader had used
to describe Burroughs, and Disch made it clear he
did not like it too much)


So, is _Disch_ the household word?????

If so..... cute.


Michelle Elliott
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: These Boots Weren't Made For Walking
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 11:11:49 GMT


In article <nssjddr.jfh@netcom.com> jfh@netcom.com (Jack
Hamilton) writes:

>Hell
>down first, them the sole.

I'm sure there's a trick to it, but I doubt it's quite
*that* difficult.

>You can't tiptoe in boots - everybody's gonna know you're
>coming.

Take the boots off first, but it might not help.

>talk lanky Texans, when about to reach their peak of sexual
>excitement, drawl "Ah'm fixin' ta cum!"

Well, glory be, Gloria, they do that in 'Bama too.

>If you can drawl with an exclamation point.

Ya kin, ah *know* it; has to do with the emphasis on
the last, lovely, releasing vowel.  Mah, mah, *mah*!

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: These Boots Weren't Made For Walking
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 13:36:22 GMT


In article <1992Apr11.101652.20691@panix.com> mara@panix.com
(Mara Chibnik) writes:

>jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton) reports:

>>>I have certainly seen some attractive images of men
>>>wearing boots, a hat, and very little else.

>anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:

>>Intriguing scents in their skin-fold areas! :-)

>Please, Jess, how do you _see_ this?

The mind's eye, just above the nose.  Made scents
to me, anyway...

>[JNS, can you help with this one?]

Are we going to have style show?

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
Newsgroups: soc.motss