HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mfraioli@grebyn.com (Marc Fraioli)
Subject: Re: TE/2 vt100 emulation problem
Organization: Grebyn Timesharing
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:43:04 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.014807.1726@gmuvax2.gmu.edu> kbass@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Ken Bass) writes:
>In article <9309@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum) writes:
>>Until last week, I was running Procomm's vt100 emulation under MSDOS
>>across a 2400 baud modem. This week it's TE/2's vt100 emulation under
>>OS/2 across a v.32bis modem. Everything works as advertised, except for
>>a serious problem with screen redraws in vi. Can anyone help?
>>
>>The specifics are that parts of the screen are often (but not always)
>>blacked out as I move across them (either with cursor movement or when
>>entering text). The area affected seems to be from the left margin to a
>>bit more than halfway across the screen. Sometimes when I enter text,
>>each character is displayed briefly and then blacked out; other times
>>several characters linger briefly and are then all blacked out at once.
>>This doesn't happen every time I use vi, but it's very frequent. It
>>usually occurs when I am editing text; if I am appending new text at
>>the end of a document, everything works smoothly.
>>
>>In all cases, the characters are being transmitted properly; if I escape
>>into control mode and repaint the screen explicitly with control-L, they
>>all reappear where they belong. Needless to say, escaping into control
>>mode and repainting the screen using control-L is not the way vi is
>>supposed to work.
>>
>>I have "redraw" set in vi and I can't find any other settings to
>>twiddle. The mainframe I'm talking to is running Ultrix 4.2. I'm using
>>the vt100-nam termcap setting. I can't prove that the problem is with
>>vi, rather than with the termcap settings in general.
>>
>>I like TE/2 in general, but I use vi constantly and the problem is so
>>frequent as to be a serious impediment to getting my work done. Any
>>suggestions?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>David
>>
>>-- 
>>Professor David J. Birnbaum         djbpitt+@pitt.edu [Internet]
>>The Royal York Apartments, #802     djbpitt@pittvms   [Bitnet]
>>3955 Bigelow Boulevard              voice: 1-412-687-4653
>>Pittsburgh, PA  15123  USA          fax:   1-412-624-9714
>
>I have the same problem using Telix for DOS under OS/2. I am also using
>Ultrix 4.1. I dont know what the answer is.
>
I see the same problem with TE/2 connecting to an Ultrix 3.0 machine.
It also sometimes loses my linefeeds, so I wind up typing a line over
the previous line.  However, as you say, if I hit CTRL-L, everything is
there.
-- 
Marc Fraioli
mfraioli@grebyn.com	        	(So I'm a minimalist...)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: amah@IASTATE.EDU ()
Subject: Problems with paradise card. Help needed.
Reply-To: amah@IASTATE.EDU ()
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 07:41:00 GMT


Hi:


I'm using a paradise card with 1MB of RAM on a 486 with 16MB of RAM. My problem
is that the OS2 full screen session loses sync once I open a DOS full screen (or
for that matter a WIN-OS2 full screen) session. It doesn't matter if I use SVGA
ON or OFF. Once it loses sync, there is no way I can get it to work except
rebooting. Once it loses sync, I would get a semi transparent white strip at the
right hand side of my desktop (about 1/2" thick). The mouse pointer behaves real
funny in that area. If I don't open a DOS session at all, no problem.

Also, how can I set the refresh frequency for my video. I can see the screen
being refreshed at a very slow rate; just like watching a program draw an
interlaced pic. It puts a lot of strain on my eyes.

Is there a solution for all these problems or should I consider buying a new
video card ?


Thanks.



Max.
From: djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: TE/2 vt100 emulation problem
Date: 19 Nov 92 15:00:00 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

>This is getting to be a FAQ... The problem has to do with the vt100 using
>tabs to position the cursor. You can either:
>
>1) get the latest version of compak2.dll, which fixes the problem (download
>TE/2 again; the new dll was inserted into the TE/2 archive),
> ...

The current version of te2_120.zoo at hobbes includes commpak2.dll
(version 1.01) and Commpak2.dll (version 1.02). When I unzooed this, zoo
found version 1.01 first and refused to overwrite it with version 1.02.
I didn't notice this was happening and didn't realize that there was a
more recent version of the dll in the same zoo file.

Solution: use the zoo option to allow overwriting (type "zoo h" for
information).

Moral: if you unzoo quietly in the background and don't watch the
extraction messages, you don't notice stuff like this.

--David
-- 
Professor David J. Birnbaum         djbpitt+@pitt.edu [Internet]
The Royal York Apartments, #802     djbpitt@pittvms   [Bitnet]
3955 Bigelow Boulevard              voice: 1-412-687-4653
Pittsburgh, PA  15123  USA          fax:   1-412-624-9714
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: amah@IASTATE.EDU ()
Subject: Re: Windows NT  is it out yet?  What will happen to OS/2?
Reply-To: amah@IASTATE.EDU ()
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 09:59:43 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.113420.22622@ousrvr.oulu.fi>, ojtv@zombie.oulu.fi (Olli
Vuolteenaho) writes:
> Bill Gates himself told reporters a couple of weeks ago that
> NT will be released between April and June 93.
> 

A Beta for Windows NT is out and can be purchased for less than 100 bucks. Don't
know all the details. Saw it in another group.



Max.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: stimpy@nmt.edu (John Reynolds)
Subject: Re: BC++ for OS/2
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy
Organization: New Mexico Tech
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:53:02 GMT

>>I've got Borland C++ 3.1 (without App frameworks) and installed every
>>bloody thing. It takes about 32 Mb. I would suppose that with App
>>frameworks, it would take close to 50Mb.....I've never really seen
>>app frameworks, but from what people tell me, I wouldn't bitch too
>>loud about the size. Until then, I long for BC++ for OS/2 (gee, perhaps
>>another 30 Mb of disk since the *rumor* (get it, _*rumor*_) is that
>>the first real release won't make OS/2, or windows, or DOS apps at the
>>touch of a 'button' like everyone (I guess) wants.... Only OS/2 apps).
>
>Who cares how much disk space it takes....I'm tired of people complaining how
>uch space development tools take!!.  These are not hobbyist toys we're talking
>about.  Most serious developers I know don't seem to mind how big tools are 
>as long as the are good.

Maybe my point was too subtle. I too agree with you. I don't give a flying
**** how big the Borland Tools (or any tools are). If they're good (and
yes, I've been EXTREMELY ipmressed with BC++3.1), who cares? 

>As for generating various type of apps, if you want an os/2 app, get an os/2
>compiler.  If you want a do app get a dos compiler.  If you want a windoze
>app get a windoze compiler.  If you want a *nix  app etc.......

I have to disagree. Talk to any developer who is 'emotionally attached' to his
favorate IDE (i.e. BC++), and tell him, "Well, you need to create
Windows apps, OS/2 apps, and DOS apps [maybe just for fun], but you can
only have your wonderful IDE, etc. for one platform." I'm not sure he'd
like you. True, how many people are going to write to all three
platforms??? Who knows? I will/am. All I'm basically saying is that it would
be nice to be able to just switch gears with a menu item, and stay with
the same IDE...

-Jr
Let's followup to .advocacy.....
-- 
DOS...Boot sector virus!????           | #include <~os2/personal.opinion.h>
Windows...It's like a stale cookie.    | John Reynolds stimpy@jupiter.nmt.edu
OS/2..."It's like buudaah" (SNL quote) | New Mexico Tech. #10 and rising!!!
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 Crashproof? NOT!
Date: 20 Nov 92 22:40:23 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Nov20.074033.11741@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> mlevis@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Mike Levis) writes:
>In article <1992Nov19.203412.23450@njitgw.njit.edu> dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:
>>Well, device drivers don't run at ring 0, at least they're not
>>supposed to.  They run at ring 2 (along with IOPL segments, I
>>believe).
>
>Actually, device drivers do run at ring 0.  From page 241 of _The Design
>of OS/2_ (Deitel and Kogan):
....

Interesting.  I'll have to re-read my source.  I was looking at the
first redbook (Control program), and I was almost certan that drivers
ran at ring 2, along with IOPL segments.  I'll have to double-check.
-- 
  |)  David Charlap          | .signature confiscated by FBI due to
 /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu | an ongoing investigation into the
((|,)                        | source of these .signature virusses
 ~|~
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: POV 1.0 and OS/2
Keywords: still trying{
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:51:37 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1992Nov16.153623.29330@u.washington.edu> rene@hardy.u.washington.edu (Rene Magritte) writes:
> 	Has anyone managed to get OS/2 working with POV raytracer v.
>1.0?  It relies (in DOS land) on a memory extender that I expect OS/2
>finds evil.  In any case, it aborts with a "not enough extended
>memory" failure message.   I'd like it if I could get this to work...

You've hit the nail right on the head.

There is, however, an OS/2 version.  It is available via anonymous ftp
from ftp-os2.nmsu.edu, directory /pub/uploads right now, I believe,
although it will be moved.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: xtifr@netcom.com (Chris Waters)
Subject: Re: Win-OS/2 won't work in background?
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:59:52 GMT

In <1992Nov16.175830.20804@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:

>This problem is mentioned in the OS/2 README file, namely that
>Win-OS/2 (or for that matter DOS) programs which use SuperVGA modes
>cannot (usually) run in the background.

Not even if you type:

DETACH WINOS2

at the command prompt???   :-) :-) :-)

(Warning--DON'T try this at home, kiddies!!!)  :-)
-- 
Chris Waters    | the insane don't | "Don't you boys know NICE songs?"
xtifr@netcom.COM| need disclaimers |                 -- Joe's mama
From: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca (ochealth)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: CONTEST!! (was Re: OS2SYS.ini file size: Interim etc.)
Date: 22 Nov 1992 05:42:47 GMT
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca

In article <1992Nov21.200030.6217@abo.fi> CBURMAN@FINABO.ABO.FI (Chris Burman) writes:
>In <10012@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> djbpitt+@pitt.edu writes:
>
>> Meanwhile, I recovered safely from an 11MB (!) os2sys.ini by using
>> copyini (reduced it to 29k). 
>
>Amateur... ;-) I've been reading the reports of growing os2sys.ini files 
>for some while, but it was only today I thought of checking the size of my 
>own: 17.5 Mb. Gasp. That explained why my system had lately become so 
>sluggish. And where my diskspace had gone...
> 

17.5 Megs!!!

OK, It's time to get a contest going!

Followup to this message with the size fo your OS2sys.ini file.


>
>
>Chris Burman, cburman@abo.fi


-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
jpm: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca         
                            Happily using OS/2 2.0 because MS Windows isNT ___
                                                      Insert VapourFeature ^^^
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: HELP!!!  Who knows what:  SYS03146 means?!?
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:56:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: njitgw.1992Nov16.165633.27257
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Nov16.012346.69625@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> jmp1@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JEFFREY MICHAEL PARSONS) writes:
>My system crashed and now it won't restart.  When I try to boot I just get:
>
>OS/2 !! SYS03146
>OS/2 !! SYS02027
>
>and then it hangs.  I tried booting from the install disk and running
>chkdsk /f.  It fixed the allocation errors caused by the crash but the system
>still won't boot.  The installation manual says that SYS2027 means: "restart
>your system".  Not much help.  Someone please help me!  I need my system back
>online now!!!  BTW, it is an Arche 386/20 w/10Mb RAM and 80Mb Seagate MFM
>drive if that helps.  OS/2 has run flawlessly for months.  Please help!


I believe SYS03146 is "message file not found", which pops up when
OS/2 can't locate the description of the message it needs.  If the
file was found, you'd see text next to the number.



-- 
  |)  David Charlap          | .signature confiscated by FBI due to
 /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu | an ongoing investigation into the
((|,)                        | source of these .signature virusses
 ~|~
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel)
Subject: Re: Bernoulli & OS/2 questions B4 I buy.
Organization: DAFCO: OS/2 Software Support & Consulting
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 14:35:52 GMT

ttomisin@news.ccutah.edu (Tom M. Tomisin) writes:

>If you format your cartridges FAT the system uses them as a big disk drive,
>and you can remove the cartridges as much as you want.  On the HPFS formated 
>cartridge the cartridge can only be removed on a system shutdown so that
>system and HPFS can be updated.

It seems to me that it ought to be possible to write a utility that
would close the HPFS file system on the non-system drive and another
utility to re-open the HPFS file system on that drive after the
cartridge had been replaced.
-- 
Dave Feustel N9MYI <feustel@netcom.com>
 
GE knew there was lots of money to be made in the diagnostic medical
machine field since it was only a matter of time before people started
getting sick from the effects of all of GE's toxic and radioactive
waste dumping. I expect GE to get into the Mortuary business next.
From: HRU003@DJUKFA11.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: HELP: Service pack with WinOS/2 3.1 Beta
Date: 16 Nov 92 10:57:30 GMT
 <1992Nov12.193457.23986@europa.asd.contel.com>
 <1992Nov13.132631.64@stiatl.salestech.com> <1992Nov14.203348.13581@PA.dec.com>
Organization: Forschungszentrum Juelich

Hello,
well if you own OS/2, SP, Winos231-Beta then all you need is the *REAL*
MS-Windows 3.1 to get a bug-free Win3.1 session under OS/2 (alas only full
screen):
  - Install OS/2 (4 partitions: a) Boot-Manager b) OS/2 (HPFS/FAT) -> C:
    c) Plain DOS (FAT) -> C: for the problematic stuff d) FAT partition -> D:
  - Install Service Pack over OS/2
  - Boot, choose DOS-Drive C:, install MS-Windows 3.1 in Drive D: (e.g. in
    D:\WIN31)
  - Boot, choose OS/2-Drive C:, apply these steps:
     - copy OS2K286.EXE from Winos231-Beta in D:\WIN31\SYSTEM
     - copy WINOS2.COM  from Winos231-Beta in D:\WIN31
     - copy D:\WIN31\SYSTEM\GDI.EXE to D:\WIN31\SYSTEM\OS2GDI.EXE
     - copy D:\WIN31\SYSTEM\USER.EXE to D:\WIN31\SYSTEM\OS2USER.EXE
  - Change settings of D:\WIN31\WINOS2.COm to DOS-fullscreen
  - Change the reference of C:\OS2\MDOS\WINOS2 in config.sys to
    D:\WIN31 (SET PATH ...)
  - Change the reference of C:\OS2\MDOS\WINOS2 in autoexec.bat to
    D:\WIN31 (PATH ...)
  - Reboot, you are done!

Jens Pirnay, Inst.f.Physik III, Univ. Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Mail: jens.pirnay@rphs1.physik.uni-regensburg.de
From: JAB156@psuvm.psu.edu (Joe Bruce)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: 16550afn, Qmodem, & OS/2: Help.
Date: 23 Nov 92 17:25:24 GMT
Organization: Penn State University

I have the same type of setup:
    16550 UART
    V.32/Turbo (12Kbps)
    483/33 w/8MB
    Qmodem 5.01, OS/2 2.0 GA + SP
...and here's my MODE command from my STARTUP.CMD:
    MODE COM2:38400,N,8,1,OCTS=ON,BUFFER=ON
I also have my Qmodem program object set up with COM_DIRECT_ACCESS off,
HW_ROM_TO_RAM on, HW_TIMER on, IDLE_SECONDS 60, and IDLE_SENSITIVITY 100.
I can multitask without affecting the file transfer, though the foreground
tasks are much slower.  Hope this helps you...

Joe
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: johns@mcs213i.cs.umr.edu (John Stone)
Subject: Re: Video7/Headland Cards
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:01:52 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla

Hi there,

I too am a Video 7 user....

I have a VRAM VGA I  (not II).

I've been extremely pleased with this card in every respect EXCEPT 
OS/2 support.  I (like you) have sent them at least 20 different
mails (on their support BBS) asking what the deal is, and they
have lied to me, changed their story, and finally just said 
"No, we're not writing any OS/2 drivers."

Way back in early march of '92, I had asked them about OS/2 drivers and 
they claimed that they were working on them... They had said at that
time that they would be finished by the end of March, or early
April.  Fine, so I wait about 4 weeks, and call 'em again.
This time they say "We aren't quite done yet, it will be another 3 or 4 
weeks, call us then."

So its the end of April, and I call 'em up and ask once again, this time
"OS/2 drivers?  We can't write any because IBM hasn't released any of
the code we need."   I say "What??? You said that they would be DONE by now!!!"
they say: "No, we haven't even started yet..."  I say "so when do you think
they'll be done now???"  they say: "Not until august at the earliest, maybe
even later."

So I let 'em go for a month or so (on the OS/2 topic anyway) and check back
this september only to discover that they have been bought by someone else,
and they won't be offering ANY tech support on the BBS until some later
point in time.  The message on the support BBS now says something to the
effect of  "There is NO projected date for OS/2 2.0 drivers, until such time
please use the OS/2 1.2 drivers..."  Unfortunately the 1.2 drivers don't
work at all with the CSD installed...

I personally have decided to get off of the Video Seven boat, as I'm afraid
they are sinking fast.  They made great cards in their heyday, and were
once the very best in support, but now the mighty have fallen and they 
seem to be abandoning everything but autocad and windows.

And since I use OS/2 24 hours 7 days a week now (no dos EVER!!!! :-)
I can't live with any more "it will be out Real Soon Now" excuses.

I'm probably going to get an ATI or a Radius card...

Oh, by the way, the generic Video Seven driver just put out (vga800.dll) 
doesn't work with my card either, same problem. I guess only the VRAM II
works with it...

Later,
           John Stone
           johns@cs.umr.edu
From: Paul.Thornett@f409.n711.z3.fidonet.org (Paul Thornett)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: OS/2 and Logitech MENU a
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 11:22:02

BY>I've been able to use my Logitech mouse with programs in VDM and OS/2 DOS
BY>windows for DOS programs which have mouse support.  I've long been using
BY>the MENU and CLICK commands which came with my Logitech mouse with DOS
BY>programs that didn't have mouse support.  Is there any way to use MENU
BY>and CLICK in an OS/2 DOS window using the mouse programs included with
BY>OS/2?

The problem here is that the MENU/CLICK software needs to be able to see the
COM port to which your mouse is attached (no idea if this holds true for the
BUS version). And the problem is that OS/2 conceals the mouse COM port from
any other software - i.e. the COM port is invisible; OS/2 simply provides a
mouse SERVICE. And when you try to run a Logitech mouse driver in DOS, it
recognizes that there's a different mouse driver hogging the show, and refuses
to run. So, unless Logitech releases new OS/2 DOS drivers/software, it ain't
going to work. And I've seen many messages suggesting Logitech have less than
no interest in OS/2.

 * SLMR 2.1a *                                                     

 * Origin: None (3:711/409)
From: shyguy@ocf.berkeley.edu (David S. Shy)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: How do you install the high res ET4000 drivers in the SP?????!!!dir
Date: 16 Nov 1992 05:30:17 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandstorm.berkeley.edu

>Type dspinstl at a command prompt, and then follow directions. All you will
>need are the 2 driver diskettes.

I don't want to start another selective.install-dspinstall war... so those
of you who got it to work just ignore me.... this message is just for the
cluesless/newbies...

if you use dspinstall, and everythign came out fine.  then great.  you're
done...

HOWEVER, for those of you who used dspinstall and found that the fonts
used in the tabs of the settings menu looked terrible (they sort of looked like
unscalable fonts enlarged 10 times... that choppy look...), this is not
normal (well... let me think about that... who's to say what's normal...)
but if you don't like the way they look, you have the option of selective
install to make it look "cleaner".  read my previous post as to how...  

there, i'm done... i hope no one's going to come after me saying "well,
i did this and this didn't happen" or "well, that's not the way ibm
says to do it..."   
-- 
=============================================================================
| David Shy		   | 486D/33/12/120 | A proud OS/2 user who isn't   |
| shyguy@ocf.berkeley.edu  | 1.4/1.2/1/1304 | deprived by Micro$oft/WindoZe |
=============================================================================
Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.misc:37166 alt.cd-rom:4589
From: shapiro@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Brian Shapiro)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,alt.cd-rom
Subject: need parameters for CDROM_G.SYS for OS/2
Date: 20 Nov 92 13:57:35 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Organization: Ohio University C.S. Dept, Athens


I need to know the parameters for the OS/2 CDROM device driver
CDROM_G.SYS. Anyone have any info?

Thanks.

brian
-- 
Brian Shapiro, Systems Support Specialist
Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701
(614) 593-1608
shapiro@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu or SHAPIROB@OUACCVMA.BITNET
From: zorrilla@cattell.psych.upenn.edu (Eric Zorrilla)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: 16550 Support? (Was Re: com16550.sys on Hobbes?)
Date: 23 Nov 92 04:35:03 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Nov22.221457.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> hank@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:

>You should not need it to provide buffered support.  The mode command can
>handle this. I do not know if com16550 will provide suport in dos-boxes.

While we're on the subject of buffered UARTS, I am about to receive a new
serial I/O board with two 16550 UARTS on board to replace my non-socketed
8250 based board.  I am currently running HyperACCESS 2.0 [OS/2 version] (3.0
as soon as it arrives in the mail) with a USRobotics Dual Standard on COM2 and
my Microsoft mouse on COM1.  What, if anything, should I have to change about
my setup so that my mouse and modem still operate correctly?

Replies can be e-mail or post and I will summarize if e-mail.  It might
be helpful to compile a section on buffered UART support in the FAQ as
I suspect that others will be interested in this question.

-- 
[--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------]
| Eric Zorrilla - Dept. of Psychology  | zorrilla@cattell.psych.upenn.edu     |
| University of Pennsylvania           | 3815 Walnut, Philadelphia, PA 19104  |
[--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------]