HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mchenry@BAEPV2.NCSU.EDU (MCHENRY@BAE.NCSU.EDU)
Subject: Re: Dork of the Week
Reply-To: mchenry@BAEPV2.NCSU.EDU (MCHENRY@BAE.NCSU.EDU)
Organization: North Carolina State University
Distribution: rec
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 20:31:33 GMT

>>
>>Other nominations?
>

How about Duke head coach Barry Wilson. He complained about FSU scoring
late on a fourth down pass and leaving their starting QB in after the
game was decided.

Isn't this the same Barry Wilson who was offensive coordinator at Duke
during a game where Duke tried a flea-flicker, a fake field goal, and
several long passes while leading 41 to 0 and left their starting QB
in until the end??? . I was at the game and it was one of the worst 
examples of attempting to run up the score I've ever seen. The opponent
was arch rival UNC and Duke's head coach at the time is now a coach
at a prominent Florida school.


KRM


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: scott@ods.com (Scott Harper)
Subject: Re: ND-A&M (was Re: Schedule Strengths, Again)
Organization: Optical Data Systems, Inc.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 22:00:10 GMT

Michael Noonan (noonan@icd3) wrote:
: scott@ods.com (Scott Harper) writes:
: 
: > I guess we'll just have to wait until A&M beats you guys in the Cotton
: > Bowl again...  You know, we *always* beat Notre Dame (1-0)...
: 
: Normally I have two standard reponses to this.
: 
:   1)  If Notre Dame comes to the Cotton Bowl, that means that Notre Dame
:       has a weak team that year.
: 
: and
:   2)  Texas A&M went on probation following that game after getting
:       caught cheating trying to beat Notre Dame.
 
To which I respond:

   1) See Bowl Coalition

and
   2) Yes, we all know God's team *never* cheats.  See Demetrius DuBose.

: But since you put the smiley there, I won't use those two responses.
: :) :) :)

Ooops, jumped on you too soon...  Oh well, :)

: All else aside, there is nothing I would want to see more than for
: an undefeated Notre Dame to face undefeated Texas A&M in the Cotton Bowl
: this year.

That's about all we Aggies can hope for in the way of getting respect...
(or undefeated Miami, or undefeated FSU, ...)

BTW, I've been to all A&Ms modern day Cotton Bowls, and the Notre Dame
game was the most enjoyable... (Although stuffing Bo Who was fun too)

: -Mike Noonan (Hmmm, Wolverines...is that a new snack cracker?)

Would *you* eat one?

-- 
Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: stassen@alc.com (Chris Stassen)
Subject: CFPOOL: Week #3 Entry
Organization: The Lion's Den, San Jose
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:27:52 GMT

If you want the introduction to the CFPOOL (rules for entry, method of
scoring, hints for strategy, etc.) just ask via Email (to stassen@alc.com).

Game list for 9/19 (18 games):

	Air Force at Wyoming
	Bowling Green at Wisconsin
	Cincinnati at Miami (Ohio)
	East Carolina at South Carolina
	Florida State at North Carolina State
	Florida at Tennessee
	Georgia Tech at Virginia
	Indiana at Kentucky
	Kansas at Tulsa
	Louisiana State at Auburn
	Louisville at Arizona State
	Maryland at West Virginia
	Nebraska at Washington
	New Mexico State at Texas-El Paso
	Rice at Duke
	Texas Tech at Oregon
	UCLA at BYU
	Virginia Tech at Temple

Reminders:	Don't forget to order your predictions by 'confidence.'
		A recap sheet is sent to those entered by Wednesday (9/16).
		Let me know if you want to get entries/results via Email.
--
Chris Stassen 			 408-943-0630 			stassen@alc.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com (Kevin Rodgers)
Subject: Re: Big Upset Early, Lousy Season
Organization: Martin Marietta Western Internal Systems, Technical Operations
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 19:30:39 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.123908.18155@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>>Brian E. Saunders writes:
>>
>>  >But remember 1988 - Purdue upset a TOSU team in Columbus, and then managed
>>  >to lose to Northwestern.<
>
>I can remember in the early 80s, when Georgia Tech beat a Bear Bryant-coached
>Bama IN BIRMINGHAM. Then the wreck preceeded to lose the remaining 10 games
>of the season.....

How did West Virginia do the year they won at Oklahoma very early in the
season (late 70s or early 80s)?  How did OU do?
-- 
Kevin Rodgers				kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com
Martin Marietta MS A16401		(303) 790-3971
116 Inverness Dr. East
Englewood CO 80112 USA			GO BUFFS!
From: JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: UMich-ND bickering (was Re: ND's DuBose Situation)
Date: 10 Sep 92 17:30:17 GMT
Organization: GM Research Labs

In article <bMr-5f-@engin.umich.edu>
hajel@engin.umich.edu (john hajel) writes:
>Please, try to get the facts before making a fool of yourself.
>The series restarted in 1985:
>Michigan Won: 1985, 1986, 1991
>Notre Dame Won: 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990

      ND  UM
1978  14  28
1979  12  10
1980  29  27
1981   7  25
1982  23  17
1985  see your own truncated record book . . . .

The word restarted is a little weak here, since before 1978,
the previous game was in WWII.  Thanks for your condescension.
It is the Ann Arbor way.
From: sjc@cs.purdue.EDU (Steve Chapin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Robert Smith/OSU's crushing of Louisville
Date: 8 Sep 92 03:37:24 GMT
	<1992Sep7.170654.26904@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University

}} In article <1992Sep7.170654.26904@cis.ohio-state.edu> atchison@frankenstein.cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark Atchison) writes:
}} 
}} Huh?  Flanker reverse for 50 yard TD; Smith shifting into wideout position; 
}} 14 passes before injury to Smith, 6 after; What's the line of reasoning behind
}} this question?

I withdraw my question; obviously I wasn't paying close enough
attention.  That's what happens when my wife gets her hands on the
remote control :-)

sjc@cs.purdue.edu               Steve Chapin           Today's Grammar Lesson:
                    ect. is meaningless; etc. == et cetera

        "...the probability of a puttering nutcase slaving alone in his
         workshop actually developing fundamentally new technology is
                     practically nil..."  -- John DeArmond
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: brian@leland.Stanford.EDU (Brian McDonald)
Subject: Re: Cal 14 v. Purdue 41
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 01:43:53 GMT


In article <44737@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> s243ap@gandalf.Berkeley.EDU (Dean Roberts) writes:
>You're right about that.  Stanfurd has tough road games at Washington
>and at UCLA, not to mention the Big Game, which is always unpredictable.
							   -------------


Really?  It's had the same outcome every time I've seen it...

Brian McDonald
brian@leland.stanford.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: schmke@cco.caltech.edu (Kevin Todd Schmidt)
Subject: Re: Schmidt Computer Rankings through 6-Sep-92
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 22:45:38 GMT

JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu writes:

>If I read the initial post concerning the rankings correctly,
>a team's rating was carried over from the previous season.
>I know that you were busy, but this seems to invalidate the
>entire system.  Teams changte dramatically during the off
>season, due to graduation, coaching changes, etc.

>You really need to adjust the rankings.

I only use last years ranking for this years initial ranking.  Given a few
weeks of this years scores that initial ranking will not be a significant
factor in the current rankings.

And I don't think that my initial rankings were all that bad considering
that they went 16-11-2 against the spread and 31-9-2 in picking winners
between Div. I-A teams.

Kevin
-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
        __ ____   __ |                           |
       / // __ \ / / | Kevin T. Schmidt          | schmke@cco.caltech.edu
      / // /_/ // /  | Jet Propulsion Laboratory | schmidt@spc5.jpl.nasa.gov
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Big Ten Review (9-5-92)
From: demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man)
Date: 8 Sep 92 17:45:45 EST
Organization: Demonic Possesions, Inc.
Summary: plus predictions

In article <Bu9uIy.Aqw@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler) writes:
> 
> Results of September 5:
> 
> OHIO STATE (1-0) 20, Louisville (0-1) 19 (Pred:  OSU 31-10):  The Buckeyes
> 	dodged a big bullet as the Cardinals went for and missed a two-point
> 	conversion in the final minute.  OSU certainly didn't dominate
> 	a Louisville team that already looks better than last year's
> 	disappointing crew.  Dan Wilkerson was the burly lineman who
> 	hurried Cardinal QB Jeff Brohm on the conversion play.  Brohm
> 	had to hurry his throw, which floated incomplete despite two
> 	receivers looking pretty open.  Louisville recovered the on-side
> 	kick, but they grabbed the ball one yard to early.  Ray Buchanan
> 	had rambled with the recovery down to around the OSU 10-yard line.
> 	89,653 at Ohio Stadium...

	More like the 19 yard line.  But you can't advance the ball on such a
play anyway?  (Can't trust those ESPN announcers :)

> 	Northwestern at Boston College

	BC by 21

> 	Missouri at Illinois (2:30 pm, ABC, Regional)

	Mizzou by 3

> 	Iowa State at Iowa (11:30 am, ESPN, National)

	Iowa finally wins :)

> 	Bowling Green at Ohio State (2:30 pm, ABC, Regional)

	OSU by 17

> 	California at Purdue (1:00 pm)

	Cal by 10

> 	Central Michigan at Mich State

        MSU by 3

> 	Miami (OH) at Indiana

        Miami by 3

> 	Michigan at Notre Dame (Noon, NBC, National)

        ND by 5

> 	San Jose State at Minnesota

        Minnesota by 3

> 	Wisconsin at Washington

        Washington by 10 to the 3rd.

> 	Temple at Penn State

        PSU by 24

Brett                                                      
_______________________________________________________________________________
Proconsul Computer Consulting                                        CHA-CHING!
Better, Cheaper, Faster					       (Pick any two :)
Disclaimer:								   NOT!
Organization: University Libraries - Technical Service, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 15:01:04 -0400 
From: "Susan R. Wagner" <sw39+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: ND vs UM

In my opinion,  Holtz showed no confidence in either his offense to move
the ball and get one first down and no confidence in his defense to stop
Michigan.  That is what bothers me the most about the play calling. 
Also, how can Mirer be considered a Heisman candidate if he can't even
move the ball in the clutch or worse, if his coach doesn't even feel he
can do it?  His coach should be his biggest cheerleader!  

Susan Wagner
CU Buff fan in Pittsburgh, PA



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder)
Subject: Re: UMich-ND bickering
Organization: American Math. Society
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 20:46:21 GMT

   In article <BuCoxx.9nA@ais.org> ssj@ais.org (Stephen S. Johnston) writes:

   } Please, try to get the facts before making a fool of yourself.

Really.  I always get the facts straight, and THEN make a fool of myself. ;-)
From: bielski@sweetpea.jsc.nasa.gov (Paul Bielski)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: lou holtz should be drawn and quartered
Date: 15 Sep 92 04:21:47 GMT
Organization: McDonnell-Douglas Space Systems
Newsreader: MS Windows WinVN

In article <1992Sep14.215912.15212@cs.wayne.edu>, steve@eng.wayne.edu (Steve Phillips) says:
>
>In article <009609B7.FA2CBEE0@BAEPV2.NCSU.EDU>, mchenry@BAEPV2.NCSU.EDU (MCHENRY@BAE.NCSU.EDU) writes:
>
>> >Notre Dame won the toss and deferred til the second half.  Michigan decided to 
>> >kick off.  Notre Dame decided to receive in the second half. :)
>> 
>> 
>> I assuming this was a mistake by the Michigan coaches. Why else
>> would they have chosen to kick off first when Notre Dame had deferred
>> their decision to the second half?
>> 
>> KRM
>
>According to Coach Moeller, the captains said "We want the ball and that
>[pointing] goal."  Curiously, the referee did not hear the part about wanting
>the ball, and awarded the choice of goal, giving ND the option to receive,
>which they did.  Draw your own conclusions...

I suspect that this is Moeller covering a mistake by his players (or himself).
After seeing Grbac's poor judgement and Moeller not calling any of his three
 timeouts at the end of the game when UM would have gotten excellent field
position, Gary's credibility is not too high in my mind. Also, why wouldn't the
players say "Uh, ref, we want the ball."
would have had excellent field position, 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: niebuhr@bnlux1.bnl.gov (david niebuhr)
Subject: Re: tu rumor
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 21:31:15 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.000830.25665@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> mzhao@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Min Zhao) writes:
>In article <1992Sep9.143601.13198@menudo.uh.edu> HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.) writes:
>>
>>semper fi,
>>
>
>  Pardon my ignorance. I've seen "semper fi" often, on bumper stickers and 
>other places, and often there is a Marine Corps bumper sticker along with it.
>What does "semper fi"  stand for ?  
> 
>Thanks for the enlightening.
>
Always faithful.

Dave


-- 

Dave Niebuhr      Internet: niebuhr@bnl.gov / Bitnet: niebuhr@bnl
Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973  (516)-282-3093
From: valdis@spica.usc.edu (Valdis Kalejs)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Russell White/Prop48
Date: 8 Sep 1992 10:04:02 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: spica.usc.edu

After comming back from San Diego and reading posts from the last few days,
I've seen quite a few pertaining to the Russell White and Prop48 and this
was the reason that he didnt go to USC. Well to numerous TV and newspaper
interviews, Russell White had stated that a big reason was that he did want
to be his own person and did not want the added pressure of being compared
to his uncle Charles White if he had gone to SC Prop 48 had little to do with
this. If this would have been the case, Curtis Conway, Willie McGinest and
a few others would not have been playing for SC today. Conway, has had sim-
milar learning disorders and had gone to a JC for a year before enrolling at
SC,he is still being tutored. But just like White he will graduate as well.
As for the Heisman trophy, well Cal fans after seeing Marshall Faulk, dont
count on it! :)

Now with the recent posts concerning "Tribute To Troy" and "Fight On", these
songs have been part of the Trojan tradition for years and WILL remain so.
As matter of fact these songs are played by request of the Athletic Dept and
by a large majority of fans. As far as the performamce of the band goes, just
ask recording artists such as Fleetwood Mac,Neil Diamond, Diana Ross,Chuck
Mangione (who have performed with the SC Band) on who is the #1 marching band!
And when ND fans claim their band is better, why do they have a High School
band in the stands when they come to the Coliseum? :(

Fight On,
Valdis Kalejs

PS: For those out there that thought I have overlooked last weekends game, Im
    working on comments right now! Stay tuned! :)



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rszczerb@schiller.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Subject: Re: lou holtz should be drawn and quartered
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 13:11:24 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.171946.10498@en.ecn.purdue.edu> lauson@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Patrick W Lauson) writes:
>In article <BILLMS.92Sep14110831@z.eecs.umich.edu> billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>>In article <19509@ector.cs.purdue.edu> sjc@cs.purdue.EDU (Steve Chapin) writes:
>>
>Did anybody else out there think that Grbac's first "interception" was not
>actually an interception.  The way I see it, this very well could have 
>given Michigan a field goal, and the win.  I was kinda surprised that they
>didn't keep showing this "catch," because to me it didn't look like he ever
>had control of the ball.
>
>-- 

If you're talking about Tom Carter's interception, I was at the game and
it looked like he caught the ball cleanly to me ... but I didn't have
the benefit of instant replays.

		- Rob

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ryan@dup.cs.fsu.edu (John Ryan)
Subject: Re: FSU Vs Ga. Tech
Reply-To: ryan@nu.cs.fsu.edu
Organization: Florida State University Computer Science Department
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 92 22:52:57 GMT

The FSU - Ga. Tech game will be on October 17 at Ga. Tech.  I don't
know the kickoff time, and some network has got to pick it up.

-- 
--------------------------------------------
-John Ryan
ryan@nu.cs.fsu.edu
From: jm21@prism.gatech.EDU (Jim Marks)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Scores
Date: 13 Sep 92 21:09:32 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <1992Sep13.143602.1835@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn) writes:
>
>e-mail - there are a lot of us out here :-) ) the scores of these games:
>
>     UCLA - Fullerton State
>     New Mexico - New Mexico State
>     UTEP - UNLV
>

UCLA 		 37 		Fullerton State 14
New Mexico State 42 		New Mexico 	39
UNLV 		 19 		UTEP 		17




-- 
************************************************************************
*Jim Marks		 	    |  Georgia Tech Research Institute *
*jim.marks@gtri.gatech.edu	    |  Concepts Analysis Laboratory    *
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rszczerb@twain.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Subject: Re: ND vs UM
Keywords: Holtz
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 15:14:49 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.133501.22139@wl.com> wyborsr@wl.com (Russ Wyborski) writes:
>	The only problem that I have with the play calling at the
>end of the ND-UM game was that the Irish weren't ready to run their
>secoond down play right after the 1st down play. Was that because they
>were playing for a tie or because they don't know how to run a 
>2-minute offense? I think that it was more the latter because if you
>look at the end of the 1st half a simliar thing happened. After the UM
>touchdown, ND started with the ball around the 25 yard line (better field
>position than at the end) and made very little effort to get the ball
>down the field for a field goal attempt. Why has no  one mentioned that
>in all the conversation of the game. 3 points there would have meant the
>same as 3 points at the end.
>	Let's face it, whether ND was going for a win or a tie they
>couldn't afford to give Michigan the ball back by punting from the 15
>yard line. If you remember, ND punted I think 3 times and two of those
>snaps skipped to Hentreich. Something about the long snapper being injured.
>The last thing that they wanted to do was to have a lousy snap, a lousy
>punt, and give Michigan a chance to win at the end.
>	Michigan was in a different position at the start of their 
>last drive. They started on the twenty and had 6 minute to go. So even
>if they punted and ND scored they might get the ball back again. And 
>correct me if I am wrong but there first 3 plays in the drive were runs
>and before the interception I think that there was only one pass. So I 
>really don't think that they were pulling out the stops to move up the
>field. This is pure conjecture, but do people really think that if the 
>situation was reversed, Moeller would have started throwing the ball from
>his own 12 yard line?
>	Lost in all the talk is the fact that in situations like this you
>go with your strengths. If you are Miami, you throw the ball. If you are
>BYU, you throw the ball. But if you are ND you run the ball to get some
>room and then you think about passing to get it up field. The big mistake
>that ND made was 1) not being ready for the 2nd down play, and 2) losing
>the first down to a penalty.

You made a lot of good points.  I agree completely.

		- Rob

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: king@meaddata.com (Mike King)
Subject: Pitt loses Tumulty for season
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 14:22:47 GMT
Distribution: usa

Tom Tumulty, Pitt's third-leading tackler last season as a freshman,
has been lost for the season with a torn chest muscle suffered on a
freak play during Pitt's 51-10 victory over Kent.

He underwent surgey Monday and will require 4 to 6 months of
rehabilitation.  He can be redshirted this season because the injury
occurred in Pitt's first game.  That would leave him with three more
years of eligibility.  See you next year Tom.

-- 
Michael W. King     |  "I'm going to graduate on  |     (513) 865-1395   
Mead Data Central   |  time, no matter how long   |     CAPRR Conversion
P.O. Box 933        |  it takes"                  | mead!mwk@uccba.uc.edu
Dayton, Ohio  45401 |      -- Rod Brookin         |    ...!uccba!mead!mwk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Faulk, 299 yds rushing vs. BYU
From: Spiro the Spiny Goldfish <MXD118@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 10:52:39 EDT
Organization: Penn State University

In article <68124@hydra.gatech.EDU>, mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) says:
>
>MXD118@psuvm.psu.edu (Spiro the Spiny Goldfish) wrote:
>
>}                   Paterno likes to spread the wealth around, however, so
>}I'd be surprised if he let anyone (ESPECIALLY a Heismann candidate) ...
>
>That's because Paterno doesn't have any running backs as awesome as
>Marshall Faulk.  Back when he had Blair Thomas or Curt Warner, for
>instance, he had no problem with giving them the ball 30-40 times
>a game.

Your memory must be getting shaky with age, you feeble old man. First of all,
notice that I made one qualification - in a CLOSE game, Paterno will of
course rush his best back quite a bit. But looking back when we had Blair
and Curt, in the few blow-outs we had, they got the hook when the game was
reasonably out of reach.

>If your complaint against Marshall Faulk's amazing rushing feats is
>that he plays in the WAC, what do you have to say about his opening
>game performance against Southern Cal (you know, the team that waxed
>Pepsi State last season)?  220 yards and 3 TD's - is that also a
>"typical" performance?

USC was certainly hard to figure last year. But I think it's hard to qualify
them as a "good" team at this point.

Again, mark my words - Pep$i $tate'$ total rushing yardage against BYU
will be greater than that of SDSU.
----
Mike Dahmus       MXD118@PSUVM  or  dahmus@cs.psu.edu
TEAM OS/2
From: mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Faulk, 299 yds rushing vs. BYU
Date: 14 Sep 92 13:35:42 GMT
Organization: Ramblin' Wrecks from Georgia Tech

MXD118@psuvm.psu.edu (Spiro the Spiny Goldfish) wrote:

}                   Paterno likes to spread the wealth around, however, so
}I'd be surprised if he let anyone (ESPECIALLY a Heismann candidate) ...

That's because Paterno doesn't have any running backs as awesome as
Marshall Faulk.  Back when he had Blair Thomas or Curt Warner, for
instance, he had no problem with giving them the ball 30-40 times 
a game. 

If your complaint against Marshall Faulk's amazing rushing feats is
that he plays in the WAC, what do you have to say about his opening
game performance against Southern Cal (you know, the team that waxed
Pepsi State last season)?  220 yards and 3 TD's - is that also a 
"typical" performance?

-- 
Mark Mitchell           Georgia Tech            mm42@prism.gatech.edu
 "There was such speed in her little body, and such lightness in her
    footfall, it is no wonder her brown study astonishes us all."