HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rocky@nnsgs50.lon40.nt.com (Dave Kennard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn
Subject: Re: DeskJet 550C
Date: 20 Jan 1993 07:52:22 GMT
Organization: Northern Telecom Europe
Distribution: comp
NNTP-Posting-Host: nnsgs50.lon40.nt.com

In article <C13zsw.LCM@news2.cis.umn.edu> alla0008@student.tc.umn.edu (Graham Allan) writes:
>In article <1993Jan19.122116.14972@infodev.cam.ac.uk> MJW19@phx.cam.ac.uk writes:
>>In article <MICROSOC.93Jan17220141@black.oxford.ac.uk> m90rjw@uk.ac.ox.ecs writes:
>>>Recently, we have seen adverts for various Deskjet 550C drivers. Can anyone
>>>out there recommend which ones are best? Like, what is the difference between
>>>the Ace 550C printer driver, and the 550C Pro-Printer driver (other than
>>>mucho dollar :-))

>I was told that the Ace driver also spools the print data to disk and then
>sends it to the printer in background. Is this true? If so, it would make
>it worth using on the normal Deskjet 500 (monochrome) as well.

You are talking about the Ace Pro-driver.  Yes, the Pro-drivers also
spools print data.  Yes it works fine with my regular DJ500.  This
software provides levels of colour seperation which can drive a DJ500C
directly - using two passes, one for the CMY cartridge <re insert paper,
change to K (black) cartridge>, do 2nd pass.  Note that the 500C only
holds one cartridge.  The 550C holds 2 cartridges - the CMY and the K.
Thus with suitable software, 1 pass printing of CMYK is possible.  Ace
now do a modified Pro-driver for the 550C.  They offer this as an upgrade
to existing Pro-driver owners (i.e.  me!).  Since I own a mono DJ500 is
all I can say is that the Pro-drivers' colour seperation is great -
allowing me to do 4 pass colour printing with seperate C, M, Y and K
cartridges.  Laborious, but fun - but you should buy a 550C if you are
planning 'serious' colour printing!

>Graham

Dave Kennard.

-- 
+-+ +-+ +- | | |  |  Regards,  Dave Kennard.
| | | | |  |/   \/  Dept. 92941, Northern Telecom Ltd, Oakleigh Road South,
|-+ | | |  |\   /  New Southgate, LONDON. N11 1HB, England, UK, (etc..)
| \ +-+ +- | | /  Voice (+44) 01-945-2195 <rocky@nnsgs50.lon40.nt.com>
From: cs92dty@brunel.ac.uk (Danny T Yates)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn
Subject: Re: Watford Electronics
Date: 28 Jan 93 11:11:04 GMT
Organization: Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]

D.Pead (rsxdp@unicorn.nott.ac.uk) wrote:
: Just out of interest - has anybody managed to get Watford Electronics
: to answer the 'phone in the last few days? I'm counting myself lucky that
: I haven't currently got anything on order from them...
: Maybe their switchboard has gone west or something.

Are you ringing the Watford or Luton branch? I generally find the Luton branch
are very good at answering the phone.

On the subject of ordering from them, I bought an A3000 back in June/July 1991.
While I was at it, I ordered a Philips TV tuner (to allow me to watch TV on
the monitor). It was advertised at 79 uk pounds (+ vat) at the time. I
chased them for four months and kept getting responses like - "they are on order
from the suppliers, they'll be here in about a week" or "We have no idea when
they will arrive". Eventually they admitted to us that they had been having
difficulty obtaining them, they had NEVER carried a stock of them, and in fact
they had never seen any of them.

Needless to say, I was furious about this, and rang the Advertising Standards
Authority. I explained the situation to them, forwarding all correspondence,
the original receipts etc. (yes, they had debited my credit card for the full
amount) They contacted Watford, and I got my money back in full. The next month
the advert for the tuner was removed from their advert.

I have never placed an order for anything with them since, instead I tend to
go to Beebug (or is it Risc Developments? I can't fathom this one!) which is
a little out of my way as I live in Luton. But at least they are reliable.

Has anybody else had a similar problem with Watford?

Dan.
From: r_voisey@kiwi.uwe.ac.uk (R Voisey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
Subject: Re: New machines ? (was Re: <None>)
Date: 27 Jan 93 10:54:24 GMT
Reply-To: r_voisey@csd.bristol-poly.ac.uk
Distribution: eunet
Organization: The University of the West of England, Bristol (The Magic Roundabout)

In article <1993Jan22.120025.13693@cs.nott.ac.uk>, smb@cs.nott.ac.uk (Simon Burrows) writes:
|> They are perfectly good A5000s. It's just that Acorn / Beebug appear to
|> want to clear their stocks of current machines. They are issue 3, fitted
|> with RISC OS 3.10, 2Mb RAM and 25MHz ARM3. You also get 200 pounds worth
|> of free software (Pipedream3, Artisan II and Chess). It is an attractive
|> offer because it lets you use whichever hard disc and monitor you want.

I gave Beebug a call about this (I'd have taken ten at that price - we're
talking 300 quid below normal dealer price, even without HD and Monitor)
and the first person I got through to quoted me 1399+VAT (ie normal RRP).
I mentioned that I'd heard of a 599+VAT deal, and she didn't know a thing
about it.  However I got put through to somone else who informed me that
they'd sold out, sorry, goodbye.

So...  they've sold out of their 599 A5000s but not out of 1399 A5000s.  I
wonder what the difference was?  Has anyone actually bought one at 599, or
know of anyone that bought one at that price?  Where were they advertised,
other than BETT?  And were any actually shipped at BETT?

Bob

-- 
  Robert J. Voisey  :  r_voisey@csd.uwe.ac.uk
         -- Probug Software Developments --
162 Staplehill Rd, Fishponds, Bristol, Avon, England
From: bayko@mercury.cs.uregina.ca (John  Bayko)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
Subject: Advocate please...
Summary: Looking for new computer
Date: 27 Jan 93 04:03:03 GMT
Distribution: eunet
Organization: University of Regina, SK, Canada


    I kind of like particularly obscure computers, and in Canada,
the Acorns certainly qualify. I've decided to upgrade my old 8-bit
computer, and would like to consider one of these...
    A note on my old system - it has a multitasking OS, few
applications, and a primitive windowing system. The OS is similar
to Unix, only really small (8-bit after all!).

    So I'd like to get some information on what Archemedes are
like - general hardware and software, as well as what they feel
like. What are some good points, what are some awkward parts?
    I'm familier with the ARM processor, but not the rest of the
hardware. What are the models, and what is expansion like (I figure
there's no AT-type bus - and that's a good thing!)? Are drives SCSI
or some propriety interface?
    I understand the OS is multitasking, and has some neat windows
stuff. Are graphics device independent? Is the file system your
standard unix or DOS type, or something different like in Macintosh
or VMS? What are the four best ways of crashing it (yes, be honest)?
    Is any language included? C or C++ (and others) available?

    I've got the address for Acorn Canada, so if I decide to get
more information, that's no problem. I'd just prefer to hear from
users rather than just read a technical pamphlet/advertisement.
    Thanks!

John Bayko.
From: gpcec@westminster.ac.uk (Tom Kirby-Green)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
Subject: Re: New machines ? (was Re: <None>)
Date: 21 Jan 93 11:32:39 GMT
Distribution: eunet
Organization: University of Westminster

In article <6534@mccuts.uts.mcc.ac.uk> zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk (Geoff Lane) writes:
>Could they possibly be clearing out the warehouse of old stock to make space
>for new machines?

	I got the impression that these where early 1st revision mother-
board A5000s that "needed" to be cleared... New machines? Well maybe the
MultiMedia systems, but NOT what I think you're thinking(?). Atleast, not
yet ;-)

-- 
/---| The University of Westminster : BSc Computer Science. Hons, Year 3 |---\
| Tom Kirby-Green            Email : gpcec@sun.pcl.ac.uk  or  Silence@Arcade |
\----------| "ARM or bust, this is a MS-Windows (tm) free zone." |-----------/
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
From: altman@cryton.demon.co.uk (Hugo Fiennes)
Subject: Re: <None>) 
Distribution: world
Organization: The Serial Port
Reply-To: altman@cryton.demon.co.uk
X-Mailer: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.19)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:11:03 +0000

In article <1993Jan27.105424.14196@csd.uwe.ac.uk> r_voisey@csd.bristol-poly.ac.uk writes:

>In article <1993Jan22.120025.13693@cs.nott.ac.uk>, smb@cs.nott.ac.uk (Simon
> Burrows) writes:
>|> They are perfectly good A5000s. It's just that Acorn / Beebug appear to
>|> want to clear their stocks of current machines. They are issue 3, fitted
>|> with RISC OS 3.10, 2Mb RAM and 25MHz ARM3. You also get 200 pounds worth
>|> of free software (Pipedream3, Artisan II and Chess). It is an attractive
>|> offer because it lets you use whichever hard disc and monitor you want.
>
>I gave Beebug a call about this (I'd have taken ten at that price - we're
>talking 300 quid below normal dealer price, even without HD and Monitor)
>and the first person I got through to quoted me 1399+VAT (ie normal RRP).
>I mentioned that I'd heard of a 599+VAT deal, and she didn't know a thing
>about it.  However I got put through to somone else who informed me that
>they'd sold out, sorry, goodbye.
>
>So...  they've sold out of their 599 A5000s but not out of 1399 A5000s.  I
>wonder what the difference was?  Has anyone actually bought one at 599, or
>know of anyone that bought one at that price?  Where were they advertised,
>other than BETT?  And were any actually shipped at BETT?

As far as I know, Desktop Projects have some base 2Mb A5000's @ 699, or
with 120Mb, 4mb, acorn multisync and (not sure?) bj10 - 1299.

Hugo

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     "Did I say that? My lips didn't move..."
Hugo Fiennes - The Serial Port                      altman@cryton.demon.co.uk
                                                or altman@cix.compulink.co.uk
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: veijalai@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Tony Veijalainen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
Subject: RE: Number of PCs: Sales figures of computers
Date: 27 Jan 93 09:21:04 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari) writes in comp.arch:

From Unix World, Jan 1993

World computer market share (%)
-------------------------------

                                1991            1996

DOS, Windows, Netware           37.0            40.0
Unix                            11.6            21.0
IBM Mainframe                   17.4            14.4
VAX/VMS                          3.7             2.6
IBM minis                        4.1             4.0
Macintosh                        3.6             4.6
Other                           22.6            13.4

Totally                         $155e9

1996 projections are by IDC


1993 Unix hardware sales
------------------------

                        Units           $billion        installed-base

Workstations            876k            14.1            2.755e6
Midrange                583k             7.4            0.931e6
Large-scale             223              1.8            673
PC Unix                 425k             0.6            1.813e6

Total                   1.46e6          23.9e9          6.535e6

Source: ITG
(Interesting to note $24 billion is sortof consistent with the previous
table).
-- 
Ajay Shah, (213)749-8133, ajayshah@rcf.usc.edu
-- 
Tony Veijalainen	e-Mail: Tony.Veijalainen@helsinki.fi (preferred)
 		(finger veijalai@cc.helsinki.fi for more information)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
From: davism@uhura.aston.ac.uk (Mik Davis)
Subject: Re: New machines ? (was Re: <None>)
Organization: Aston University
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL241235]
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 13:15:57 GMT

I think the point here is essentially whether these machines have anything wron
with them - like non-working ports etc. And whether if they do go wrong, you
will be able to get them fixed properly.
  What are Beebug like on after-sales? (I think I've heard that question before
:-)  )

--
___________________________________________.
 Mik Davis at Aston University, Birmingham |   .  .  __          .
                                           |   |\/|  | \  _,_  _  _
E-Mail: davism@uhura.aston.ac.uk           |   |  |. |_/ |_| \/ |/_'
From: ijp@doc.ic.ac.uk (Ian Palmer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
Subject: Re: New machines ? (was Re: <None>)
Date: 21 Jan 1993 11:45:07 -0000
Organization: Department of Computing, Imperial College, University of London, UK.
Distribution: eunet
NNTP-Posting-Host: oak47.doc.ic.ac.uk

In article <1993Jan21.112316.12498@aston.ac.uk> davism@uhura.aston.ac.uk (Mik Davis) writes:
:Geoff Lane (zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk) wrote:
:: 
:: BEEBUG are currently offering a limited number of 2M A5000 RO3.1 machines
:: for just under 700 pounds (+vat presumably)
:: 
:: Could they possibly be clearing out the warehouse of old stock to make space
:: for new machines?
:
:  Are you sure they are RO3.1? I saw several ads in Januarys Acorn User for
:dealers selling off stocks of the old RiscOS3.0 machines with the 40Mb HD.
:
:  Mik (Who hasn't got his February subscription copy yet)

From what I remember, these are a special lot of A5000s. The advert
says they come with 3.1, but the #700 does NOT include HD or monitor. 

Ian

-- 
                            E-mail : ijp@doc.ic.ac.uk
 ___           __       Snail mail : Department of Computing, Huxley Building,
  /  _   _    /_/ _   / _ _   _  _   Imperial College, 180 Queens Gate,
_/_ (_|_| )  /   (_|_(_| ) )_|/_)    London. SW7 2BZ. England.
From: zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk (Geoff Lane)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
Subject: New machines ? (was Re: <None>)
Date: 21 Jan 93 09:34:37 GMT
Distribution: eunet
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre, Manchester, England, M13 9PL.

>In article <6677@falcon.ukc.ac.uk>, jtn@ukc.ac.uk (Jim Noble) writes:
>> Following the recent rumours of new machines, I thought I would put 
>> together a wish list of what I would like to see in them. Ok, so maybe it 
>> is a bit too late if the development has been going long, but I'm enjoying 
>> myself. Drool, drool....


BEEBUG are currently offering a limited number of 2M A5000 RO3.1 machines
for just under 700 pounds (+vat presumably)


Could they possibly be clearing out the warehouse of old stock to make space
for new machines?




-- 
Geoff. Lane. | Internet: zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk | Janet: zzassgl@uk.ac.mcc.uts
UTS Sys Admin,  Manchester Computing Centre,  Oxford Rd,  Manchester, M13 9PL
Exactly who makes the Tannoy announcements in M*A*S*H?  It can't be Radar
and there is never anyone else in the office.  (This refers to `classic'
M*A*S*H of course, not M*A*S*H*Lite with all the Radar removed at source.)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
From: altman@cryton.demon.co.uk (Hugo Fiennes)
Subject: Re: <None> 
Distribution: world
Organization: The Serial Port
Reply-To: altman@cryton.demon.co.uk
X-Mailer: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.19)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:12:31 +0000

In article <1993Jan26.130858.6027@infodev.cam.ac.uk> idg10@phx.cam.ac.uk writes:

>In article <1993Jan22.183434.1@vxdesy.desy.de>, burke@vxdesy.desy.de (Stephen
> Burke) writes:
>|> I was, of course, overstating things a bit. However, most of the proposed
>|> hardware improvements are really only for niche markets, whereas on the
>|> software side almost everything could be improved - even the standard trio
>|> of wordprocessor, spreadsheet and database aren't very well represented.
>|> What fraction of Acorn sales go to people doing TV graphics or needing
>|> 38kbaud serial ports?
>|> 
>
>What proportion of serial port users are going to be satisfied for long with
>a port that won't go faster than 19.2kbaud?
Quite a few.
>
>And why do we think that there aren't many Arcs in TV graphics?  They're not
>really up to it - the Amiga is all round better qualified for the job.
Not necessarily graphics, but as controllers - yes. Eg Sony Broadcast called
me yesterday, wanting a dual serial podule to run at 38400 for a video
system (see, answers both of your questions :-) ... and it really happened.)

>
>Ian Griffiths
>
Hugo
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     "Did I say that? My lips didn't move..."
Hugo Fiennes - The Serial Port                      altman@cryton.demon.co.uk
                                                or altman@cix.compulink.co.uk
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
From: idg10@cl.cam.ac.uk (I.D. Griffiths)
Subject: Re: <None>
Reply-To: idg10@phx.cam.ac.uk
Organization: U of Cambridge Computer Lab, UK
Distribution: eunet
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 13:08:58 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.183434.1@vxdesy.desy.de>, burke@vxdesy.desy.de (Stephen Burke) writes:
|> I was, of course, overstating things a bit. However, most of the proposed
|> hardware improvements are really only for niche markets, whereas on the
|> software side almost everything could be improved - even the standard trio
|> of wordprocessor, spreadsheet and database aren't very well represented.
|> What fraction of Acorn sales go to people doing TV graphics or needing
|> 38kbaud serial ports?
|> 

What proportion of serial port users are going to be satisfied for long with
a port that won't go faster than 19.2kbaud?

And why do we think that there aren't many Arcs in TV graphics?  They're not
really up to it - the Amiga is all round better qualified for the job.

Ian Griffiths
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
From: burke@vxdesy.desy.de (Stephen Burke)
Subject: Re: <None>
Organization: (DESY, Hamburg, Germany)
Distribution: eunet
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 18:34:34 GMT

In article <1004@rook.ukc.ac.uk>, mre@ukc.ac.uk (Mike) writes:
> Sorry, I have to disagree here.  Both software and hardware are
> equally important - neither is any use without the other.  The
> software available for the Archimedes is not using the existing
> machines to the full, but the hardware is already not capable of
> supporting all the uses to which people want to put it.  

I was, of course, overstating things a bit. However, most of the proposed
hardware improvements are really only for niche markets, whereas on the
software side almost everything could be improved - even the standard trio
of wordprocessor, spreadsheet and database aren't very well represented.
What fraction of Acorn sales go to people doing TV graphics or needing
38kbaud serial ports?

e----><----p | Stephen Burke           | Internet: burke@vxdesy.desy.de
 H   H   1   | Gruppe FH1T (Liverpool) | DECnet:   vxdesy::burke (13313::burke)
 H   H  11   | DESY, Notkestrasse 85   | BITNET:   BURKE@DESYVAX or SB2@UKACRL
 HHHHH   1   | 2000 Hamburg 52         | JANET:    sb2@uk.ac.rl.ib
 H   H   1   | Germany                 | Phone:    + 49 40 8998 2282
 H   H 11111 | HERA, the world's largest electron microscope!
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
From: davism@uhura.aston.ac.uk (Mik Davis)
Subject: Re: New machines ? (was Re: <None>)
Organization: Aston University
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL241235]
Distribution: eunet
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 13:13:45 GMT

Tom Kirby-Green (gpcec@westminster.ac.uk) wrote:
: 
: 	I got the impression that these where early 1st revision mother-
: board A5000s that "needed" to be cleared... New machines? Well maybe the
: MultiMedia systems, but NOT what I think you're thinking(?). Atleast, not
: yet ;-)
: 

  and would it be a silly question to ask how you know?  :-)

--
___________________________________________.
 Mik Davis at Aston University, Birmingham |   .  .  __          .
                                           |   |\/|  | \  _,_  _  _
E-Mail: davism@uhura.aston.ac.uk           |   |  |. |_/ |_| \/ |/_'
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
From: davism@uhura.aston.ac.uk (Mik Davis)
Subject: Re: New machines ? (was Re: <None>)
Organization: Aston University
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL241235]
Distribution: eunet
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 11:23:16 GMT

Geoff Lane (zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk) wrote:
: 
: BEEBUG are currently offering a limited number of 2M A5000 RO3.1 machines
: for just under 700 pounds (+vat presumably)
: 
: Could they possibly be clearing out the warehouse of old stock to make space
: for new machines?

  Are you sure they are RO3.1? I saw several ads in Januarys Acorn User for
dealers selling off stocks of the old RiscOS3.0 machines with the 40Mb HD.

  Mik (Who hasn't got his February subscription copy yet)

--
___________________________________________.
 Mik Davis at Aston University, Birmingham |   .  .  __          .
                                           |   |\/|  | \  _,_  _  _
E-Mail: davism@uhura.aston.ac.uk           |   |  |. |_/ |_| \/ |/_'
From: smb@cs.nott.ac.uk (Simon Burrows)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
Subject: Re: New machines ? (was Re: <None>)
Date: 22 Jan 93 12:00:25 GMT
Distribution: eunet
Organization: Nottingham University

In article <1jm2c3INNfd@oak47.doc.ic.ac.uk> ijp@doc.ic.ac.uk (Ian Palmer) writes:
>:: 
>:: BEEBUG are currently offering a limited number of 2M A5000 RO3.1 machines
>:: for just under 700 pounds (+vat presumably)
>:
>:  Are you sure they are RO3.1? I saw several ads in Januarys Acorn User for
>:dealers selling off stocks of the old RiscOS3.0 machines with the 40Mb HD.
>:
>:  Mik (Who hasn't got his February subscription copy yet)
>
>From what I remember, these are a special lot of A5000s. The advert
>says they come with 3.1, but the #700 does NOT include HD or monitor. 

They are perfectly good A5000s. It's just that Acorn / Beebug appear to
want to clear their stocks of current machines. They are issue 3, fitted
with RISC OS 3.10, 2Mb RAM and 25MHz ARM3. You also get 200 pounds worth
of free software (Pipedream3, Artisan II and Chess). It is an attractive
offer because it lets you use whichever hard disc and monitor you want.

Simon
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simon Burrows   smb@cs.nott.ac.uk  psyhsmb@unicorn.nott.ac.uk  +44 533 712030
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ijp@doc.ic.ac.uk (Ian Palmer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.advocacy
Subject: Re: New machines ? (was Re: <None>)
Date: 21 Jan 1993 14:10:50 -0000
Organization: Department of Computing, Imperial College, University of London, UK.
NNTP-Posting-Host: oak43.doc.ic.ac.uk

In article <1993Jan21.131557.14058@aston.ac.uk> davism@uhura.aston.ac.uk (Mik Davis) writes:
>I think the point here is essentially whether these machines have anything wron
>with them - like non-working ports etc. And whether if they do go wrong, you
>will be able to get them fixed properly.

Well essentially, unless any faults are pointed out before sale (ie.
they point out that these are cheap because X is wrong with them),
then you are entitled to get them fixed (well actually, your money
back). As they say nothing about them being faulty, you can assume they
aren't.

>  What are Beebug like on after-sales? (I think I've heard that question before
>:-)  )
>

Well this is another matter :-)


Ian

-- 
                            E-mail : ijp@doc.ic.ac.uk
 ___           __       Snail mail : Department of Computing, Huxley Building,
  /  _   _    /_/ _   / _ _   _  _   Imperial College, 180 Queens Gate,
_/_ (_|_| )  /   (_|_(_| ) )_|/_)    London. SW7 2BZ. England.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn
From: jna10@cl.cam.ac.uk (J.N. Abley)
Subject: Best buy ARM 3 for old A440/RO3.10
Reply-To: JNA10@phx.cam.ac.uk
Organization: U of Cambridge Comp Lab, UK
Distribution: comp
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 12:11:39 GMT

Does anyone have any opinions as to where to get an ARM3/MEMC1a at
a *really low price*? :-) I don't really care how slowly it runs
in comparison to other highly-clocked upgrades - anything's got to
be quicker than what I've got at the moment...

Joe

--
---
Joe Abley, Jesus College, Cambridge, CB5 8BL 
jna10@phx.cam.ac.uk      Phone (0223) 301680