Newsgroups: ca.politics
Subject: Re: Phil Ronzone says he looks for dirty pictures (Was Re: ...harassing calls)
From: mike@batpad.lgb.ca.us (mike batchelor)
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 92 22:05:43 PDT
Distribution: world               
Organization: The Batchelor Pad

phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) writes:
>
> In article <mike02501920807094451@batpad.lgb.ca.us> mike@batpad.lgb.ca.us (mike batchelor) writes:
> >phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) writes:
>     >I still want to know what your interest in reading a.b.p.e
>     >was in the first place. I think it is very relevant to the
>     >discussion at hand, because it is the readers of a.b.p.e that
>     >create the demand which the posters fulfill. You should not
>     >be surprised to find images with a sexual content or a
>     >component of nudity in that group, but for some reason, you
>     >were not only surprised, but shocked enough to mount a
>     >net.campaign against the poster.
>     >
>     >So, Phil - please tell us what draws you to
>     >alt.binaries.pictures.erotica. Were you upset at the
>     >boy-and-pony-show picture because it didn't have any big
>     >tits?
> 
> Suckers. I was creating a GIF masher and wanted to have lots of different
> GIF sources. Obviously, looking at nake females is a lot more interesting
> that the latest cropped version of the mandril image or the tenth
> scanned red Porsche.
> 
> And, Jesus, can't you fucking READ! I mounted no net campaign. When I work
> at a company and some homosexual yahoo posts sexual content pictures with
> underage people (children) of course I am going to do something.
> 
> The first message was to the effect of "Jesus Christ -- are you fucking crazy?
> Do you want to get net privileges yanked for all of us?" I could see the
> headlines -- major workstation company involved in child porn.
> 
> When the yahoo responded with a rude fuck you -- I told my boss (who enjoyed
> the choicer specimens of abpe). When he saw the latest work posted ( a .dl
> of two young boys sucking a pony) he turned white -- quite an achievment
> cosnidering he's asian.
> 
> Do YOU think it is O.K. to post such things (i.e., the .dl) from a company's
> systems? I don't.

I don't think you have much room to criticize someone else's
pornography when you are in there grazing for your own.  I don't think
your idea of what is degrading and inappropriate carries any weight in
light of your own tastes in degradation and inappropriateness.  I
don't think anyone who can say in public without blushing, that he
likes to look at "women with big tits," has any cause at all to be
concerned with what other people like to look at.

Personally I am not interested in pornography - it's boring.  I have
absolutely no objection at all to anyone wanting to look at it, or
whack off to it, and I am certainly not going to tell anyone what is
good pornography, what is bad pornography, and what is appropriate
pornography.  It's just a picture.  Your soul is not captured by the
camera, once the image is made it is made.  Without question the act
of making the boy/pony picture should be illegal, but the picture itself
is JUST A THING NOT AN ACT, you anthropological throwback!!

You and the boss you rode in on are just like the parent who tells his
kid "Don't use drugs," as he puts out his cigarette in the beer can
he just emptied.  You and the boss you rode in on are hypocrites to
the Nth degree, and the only thing more appalling than the fact that
you objected to the .dl is the fact that you have no clue about how
STUPID your objection to it was in the first place.



[] ---
[] Mike Batchelor -- mike@batpad.lgb.ca.us
[] Long Beach, California
Xref: sparky ca.politics:7745 talk.politics.misc:45273