From: kcochran@isis.cs.du.edu (Keith A. Cochran)
Subject: Re: b r a w l e y withdraws? (was Re: A question for any MALE prolifer)
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 92 13:58:17 GMT


[Note:  I'm leaving this whole thing intact because I don't want Kevin B.
whining about how I'm "Taking things out of context"...]

In article <1992Apr17.064114.13018@liebe.uucp> kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) writes:
>keegan@kazoo.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
>
>>in a demonstration of just how fast the net can overcome someone,
>>kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) rages:
>>-> keegan@scoobiedoo.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
>>-> >in a post devoid of reason, kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) writes:
>>-> >-> keegan@kazoo.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
>>-> >-> >kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) rants to muriel:
>>-> >-> >-> Standard Pro-Death tactics is to scream their opinion
>>-> >-> >-> while trying to shut others out.
>>-> >-> 
>>-> >-> >it's odd you'd say that. i don't believe i've ever heard
>>-> >-> >a single "Pro-Death" person scream. no doubt, this is
>>-> >-> >because i don't know any "Pro-Death" people, which is
>>-> >-> >also odd. because i've been around this newsgroup a long,
>>-> >-> >long time while you have just arrived.  still, you
>>-> >-> >deserve the benefit of the doubt i suppose.  so, please
>>-> >-> >list the name of the people you call "Pro-Death" along
>>-> >-> >with some evidence that they are "Pro-Death." then we can
>>-> >-> >move on to this screaming business.  once you take care
>>-> >-> >of this wee matter, i'm sure any questions as to your
>>-> >-> >integrity will be answered.
>>-> >-> 
>>-> >-> Glad to oblige.  
>>-> >-> 
>>-> >-> 1. The fetus (human or not) is a life.
>>-> 
>>-> >human or not? are you proposing some protection for mammals,
>>-> >plants, viruses, fish, insects, cancer......
>>-> 
>>-> I'm devoid of reason?  You have refuted nothing.  The issue,
>>-> bonehead, is abortion of human fetus'.  The parenthetical
>>-> phrase was in deference to twits like yourself.  (human or
>>-> not)
>
>>well then sonny, rewrite your phrase and resubmit it written in
>>such a way that it clearly represents what you want to say.
>
>>-> >-> 2. When you terminate the life you bring death.
>>-> 
>>-> >-> 3. Hence people wanting the ability to bring death (ie.
>>-> >-> so-called Pro-Choicers) are Pro-Death.
>>-> 
>>-> >have you had your tonsils removed sonny?
>>-> >have you ever had a haircut, trimmed your fingernails?
>>-> >you'd better try again.
>>-> >and don't forget to include your list of names this time.
>>-> 
>>-> Well, seems your whole post is nonsense (since you couldn't
>>-> even comprehend the premise).
>
>>i take it then that you shall be withdrawing your nonsense which
>>began this discussion; that is this nonsensical statement:
>
>>	"Standard Pro-Death tactics is to scream their opinion
>>	while trying to shut others out."
>
>>don't feel too bad kid. people like you pop into t.a. a couple of
>>times each year. most don't last.
>
>Here is a prime example of the difference between the Life/Choice
>sides of the issue.  I have proven my points time and again with
>LOGIC.  This post is what I get in response.

You've "proven" anything since you came crashing into t.a?  Don't lie,
Kevin.  Jesus don't like liers.

>
>Since you haven't followed all the debate I'll give you the idea
>of the meaning of the quote you took out of context.
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(1)Most people on t.a have been following "all the debate".  Now, let's
watch the bouncing context ball...

(2)Before you suggest that what you've been doing is actually debating
anything, might I suggest you take some debating classes?
>
>"Standard" as in "Typical"
So, you're taking this out of context...
>"Pro-Death" as in "Pro-Choice" "
So, you're taking this out of context...
>"tactics" as in "strategy"
So, you're taking this out of context...
>"scream their opinion" as in "promote their ill-conceived ideas" 
So, you're taking this out of context...
>"shut others out" as in "attempting to rid the group of people who disagree"
So, you're taking this out of context...
>
>So:  Typical Pro-Choice strategy is to promote their ill-conceived ideas
>     while trying to rid the group of people who disagree.

So, you're taking this entire thing out of context.  Gee, why doesn't it
suprise me that you're doing that?
>
>Is it justified?  This was in response to a couple of pro-deathers
                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^

You just don't listen, do you Mr. Anti-Women's-Rights???

>telling me it would be better if I didn't post any more.  Now, you
>can retract, asshole.

Gee, you wouldn't be taking our comments OUT OF CONTEXT, now would you?

What we (before you start bitching, I'm using the word "we" to mean, "Myself
and some other t.a posters) said was that before you walk in, start screaming,
and then get pissed off when people flame you is to lurk for a while.  You'd
be amazed at how much you can learn by _reading_ some before you start
posting.
--
=kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu   |  !uunet!nyx!kcochran  |  kcochran@isis.cs.du.edu  =
=B(0/1/2/3) f- t w- c- d- s++(+) m e++ r(-) p k(+) <--My BearCode, if you care=
=My thoughts, my posts, my ideas, my responsibility, my beer, my pizza.  Ok???=
=Ex-Girlfriend of Rocker, Susan, Linda, and Larry.  Damm Proud Of It, And FWA!=