HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 14:34:15 -0500
From:         FAC_JCLARK@JMUVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: George and Bob

scott & others,

I need a clarification on this Brenda Starr thing.  Although I understand
it's only been out on video a very brief period, the question is... did it
get a theatrical release?  When??  That, too, is what I missed.  I know
it didn't play around here.  But then the beloved T&L only played one
short week, while Dances With Wolves seemed to hang around forever.

JC
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 10:32:57 -0500
From:         Ens Alexander W Ellermann <ellerman@NORFOLK.NADN.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Rashomon

Morning!
        I'm sitting here listening to the Nat King Cole Christmas album
($3.44 @ Tower Records) & thinking about Rashomon, which I saw last night.

                        ***SPOILERS FOLLOW***

        I realize it's not very risky to go around praising Akira Kurosawa,
but the man has solidified his position as my favorite filmmaker.  Rashomon
was an incredible piece.  I didn't think it was possible to tell the same
story four different times & make each time (& version) compelling.  After
watching it, I rewound to the wife's version so I could prove to my wife that
a Shakuhachi version of the Bolero was playing in the background & building
with the scene (I was wrong - it was just the Bolero percussion & undercurrent
w/a different theme) & wound up watching the movie aver again from there.
Though I'd just seen it, the picture was just as gripping the second time
around.
        I have to wonder about Toshiro Mifune, though.  In both this & The
Seven Samurai, he plays his characters with such overstatement that they
lose something for me.  Perhaps it's his laugh - I don't know.  I do know
that I liked him more in versions of the story that were not his.  I was
especially intrigued by the Takashi Shimura's version & its swordfight.  It
was the most unique mano a mano battle I remember in that it showed the
fear of the two duelers so well.  I'm so used to seeing unflappable samurai
wheeling through their battles.  What a striking change to see two men who are
scared
to death tremble & scrap their way through a fight.  Their feelings reflect
the war stories I've been told more than all the fearless battler stuff we
usually see.
        The dead man's version was also compelling.  The medium spooked me to
no end.  It's amazing how a good actress, well-choreographed cinematrography,
& a rather pedestrian voice remix can send more chills up a spine than all
the rolling eyes, spinning heads, & crawling bugs of your average possession
scene (Warlock, Exorcist, etc.).
        One more thing - the technique of making us the judges as each person
tells us stories really brought me into the picture.  When, finally, one of
the men in the pagoda talks about how we each make up our lies to deal with
reality, it made me think about the lie of our being involved in the picture
&, for that matter, alll the lies of in- or exclusion we tell ourselves all the
time.
        Finally, may I reiterate:  "What a picture!"  If you haven't seen it
yet, do yourself a favor & pick it up tonight.

        Funny, I like it even more now that I've thought about it some more
out loud.

        And...that makes the last of the "must-sees" from my department video
library.  Now I've got to start paying for movies!  Drat!

                                                Enthusiastically,
                                                                Alex
From: $W$LB4P@LUCCPUA.BITNET (Rolando Recometa)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Subject: Video Duds
Date: 16 Dec 92 15:43:00 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

MEDICINE MAN - Lorraine Bracco rants and screams while Sean
Connery regrets not being in a James Bond movie so he could
slap her around.
FINAL ANALYSIS - It's Phil Joanu doing Brian de Palma doing
Alfred Hitchcock. It's Richard Gere doing Kim Basinger. It's
much ado about nothing.
SHINING THROUGH - More like WORKING GIRL FIGHTS THE NAZIS. This
dim-witted rip-off of Casablanca stars cutesy-pooh Melanie
Griffith and Kirk Douglas wannabe Michael Douglas, who seems to be
in a lot of worthless films lately. A basic instinct, perhaps?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  _CIN
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 18 Dec 1992 11:11:00 PST
From:         THOMPSON@UCRVMS.BITNET
Subject:      Ebert's new book

Roger Ebert's 1993 Home Movie Companion is out, and as usual, I'm calling
all the video sources he lists, and as usual, his information is
out of date in some cases.

Barr Digital no longer publishes the newsletter he recommends, hasn't
in years, in fact.

Metro Golden Memories will send their catalog free, not for $1.

TLA Video now charges $5.95 + $2.00 shipping, not jut $2.00

Ken Crane's Laserdisc has moved to 14251 Beach Blvd., Westminster, CA
92683.

Facets Multimedia's catalog is $7.95 IF YOU ORDER BY THE END OF THIS
MONTH, $9.95 thereafter.  (This is catalog #12, a new one.)

Jim Thompson
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: FISHERKJ
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 07:39:08 -0400
From:         FISHERKJ@SNYONEVA.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Dracula

>Let's say I need to keep my spending to under a $1000
>for a new TV-- I want the biggest viewing area with the
>best resolution possible for the least amount of money...

I have two words for you: SONY XBR. No contest.

Well, four words.

kjf-
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 11:55:00 CST
From:         Rolando Recometa <$W$LB4P@LUCCPUA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Michael and Angel

Michael,
      I used "beautiful" to describe Angel because of the clarity
of its technique, the vividness of the characters, and the wide
spectrum of emotions(including "melancholy") that the film evoked.
And the pace was leisurely, not "leaden". There is no such thing as
a long or slowly paced movie for me; just underdeveloped characters
and boring situations. Batman Returns, Alien III, and Lethal Weapon
3 are all "leaden" - quick cuts with nowhere to go and a long time
getting there.
                                             Rolando
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:15:14 GMT
From:         Fintan Aylward <eeifad@EEIUD.ERICSSON.SE>
Subject:      unsubscribe

PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 11:06:03 -0600
From:         JACKSOSM@VUCTRVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: PoMo etc.

JC,

Thanks for the clarification on Herzog.  I read the sentences very slow and
pronounced all the words carefully one at a time.  And yes, even with
my limited cognitive capabilities, the meaning became clear.

j-man
    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: State University of New York - Central Administration
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 13:29:51 EST
From:         PAUL BRUCKER <BRUCKEPJ@SNYCENVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Murphy

  December 15th, Village Voice, Micheal Musto writes:

    'The Distinguished Gentleman' has Eddie Murphy's character screaming
     out, "Dick is good! Dick is good!" --not in an admission of any
     sexual predilection, mind you, just as part of a barrage of phallic
     single entendres that Eddie unleashes from the urinal to the Capitol
     building, all thanks to another character brilliantly happening to be
     named Dick. Alas, the so-so formulaic comedy isn't the throbber Murphy
     needs to regain his old size and stature.

   ------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Anyone seen it yet? How is it?

              pb
          bruckepj@snycenvm
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: The University of Mississippi
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 14 Dec 1992 10:45:20 CST
From:         Ron Kitchens <CCRONK@UMSVM.BITNET>
Subject:      MVPTTRML

I am installing TCP/IP v2.2.1 on MVS/XA.  However, after putting MVPTTRML
in SYS1.LPALIB as suggested, and trying to IPL with CLPA I get:

IEA358I MODULE MVPTTRML NON-EXECUTABLE
IEA354I CLPA FAILED - NON-EXECUTABLE MODULES

and the machine hangs.  Anybody else had this problem?  Any suggestions?

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ron Kitchens                              PHONE:    (601) 232-7206
Systems Programmer                        FAX:      (601) 232-7180
Room 318, Powers Hall                     BITNET:   CCRONK @ UMSVM
University, MS  38677                     INTERNET: ccronk @ vm.cc.olemiss.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 12:12:00 EST
From:         Alice Jackson <TS5363@OHSTMVSA.BITNET>
Subject:      NETSTAT Reports Incorrect Data

  During a recent problem situation, I used NETSTAT extensively
to see who was logged on to our MVS system through TCP/IP.  The
NETSTAT TELNET command showed many users logged on to various
applications when, in fact, only a few were actually connected.
I discovered later that NETSTAT TELNET was reporting *attempts*
to logon to an application, rather than actual telnet sessions
with VTAM applications.
  Another time, our ethernet LAN controller was not working, but
NETSTAT DEVLINKS showed it to be in a READY status (its status at
TCPIP startup).
  I have reported both of these problems to IBM Support, but they
tell me NETSTAT only looks at control blocks that TCP/IP builds
before setting up the session, and those control blocks are not
updated if session establishment fails.  In the case of the device,
the control block is built at TCPIP startup time, and not updated
if there is a change in device status.
  The TCP/IP User's Guide says, "To confirm the existence of a
connection, display the status of the Telnet server using the
telnet parameter ...."  Support tells me NETSTAT is working
"correctly".  I have submitted a PASR.

Alice Jackson                 jackson.11@osu.edu
The Ohio State University     614-292-3687
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Charset: MACINTOSH
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 09:22:34 GMT
From:         Chris Hopper <Chris_Hopper@INTERLINK.COM>
Subject:      List sign-up

Subject:  List sign-up                                    12/11/92    9:15
Please add my mail address to the list for IBM TCP/IP product information.

Internet mail:  coh@interlink.com

Paper mail:     Christopher Hopper
                Interlink Computer Sciences, Inc.
                47370 Fremont Blvd.
                Fremont, CA 94538

                510-657-9800 voice
                510-659-6381 fax

If I have not followed correct procedure to request addition to the list
then please let me know what the correct procedure is.

Also, how can I get a list of all the mail lists available on the Internet?

Thanks and regards,

Chris Hopper
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: U.S. Dept. of Energy
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 10:03:27 EST
From:         "Roger D. Parish" <U9505RP@DOEMA.BITNET>
Subject:      3172 Questions

I'm posting this question for someone at one of our field sites that doesn't
have regular Bitnet/Internet access.

 How can you load balance TCP/IP sessions to a single host (MVS in this case)
 across multiple 3172s? We would like to keep a single name for the host in our
 DNS instead of having multiple entries, so that isn't an option.

 Also, I have heard that in *large* shops, using the offload feature on the
 3172 may have detrimental effects on your network. Can anybody confirm/refute
 this statement? If it is true, at what threshold/volume does this
 become a problem?

 One last question, what tools do I have available to monitor how burdened my
 3172s are...SNMP on the host perhaps could provide the info that I want, but
 I don't have the time to write an adequate interface nor time to sort through
 all the MIB variables...is there any freebie-ware available?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Heidelberg University Computing Center
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 14 Dec 1992 08:25:31 CET
From:         Michael Hebgen <X02@VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      Re: Gopher implementation

On Fri, 11 Dec 1992 12:58:33 CET Piotr Konstanty said:
>
>Hi,
>about month ago Jim Garrison asked on this list about REXTCPIP for Vienna
>CMS Gopher implemantation. Can I get some information about possible Gopher
>implementation for VM system and especially about how to get Vienna CMS
>Gopher programm.
>--Piotr
>
>**************************************************************
>* Piotr Konstanty                     voice: +48 (56) 260-17 *
>* Computer Centre                       fax: +48 (56) 218-50 *
>* Nicolas Copernicus University                              *
>* Chopina 12/18                      e-mail:                 *
>* 87-100 Torun             internet   pk10@cc.torun.edu.pl   *
>* Poland                   BITNET     PK10@PLTUMK11          *
>**************************************************************

For Vienna-Gopher and REXTCPIP for Vienna Gopher please contact
Gerhard Gonter (email: Gerhard.Gonter@wu-wien.ac.at or
GONTER@AWIWUW11.bitnet)

Regards, Michael Hebgen

P.S. I recently got everything from Gerhard Gonter and installed it
- he is very cooperative and Vienna Gopher is a very nice Server and
Client implementation of Gopher on VM/CMS!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:42:27 -0500
From:         "Keith Donnenwirth;AGMC/SCC/CDSI" <donnen@LOGDIS1.AG.AFLC.AF.MIL>
Subject:      TCP/IP 2.2.1 on MVS/SP 1.3.5

Has anyone installed TCP/IP 2.2.1 on a MVS/SP system?
If so, how is it working for you?
What REGION SIZE and FREEBUFFERPOOLSIZEs did you use?

Did you have any problems with TSO/ISPF address space abends?

I have had TCP/IP work just fine when the system is not heavily used,
but when it's loaded with many TSO users we start having TSO address
spaces abend with a OC4 when TCP/IP commands are entered.  Eventually
the whole system hangs.

I have this called into IBM, but I would appreciate any comments anyone
may have.

Thanks
From: UZR11F@IBM.RHRZ.UNI-BONN.DE (Hans Dieter Petersen)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Re: Is ALTTCPHOSTNAME repeatable?
Date: 16 Dec 92 13:23:07 GMT
Organization: Universitaet Bonn, RHRZ; Wegelerstr. 6; D-5300 Bonn 1
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.

Yes you an specify more than one alttcphostname in the config file
regards
Hans Dieter
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: IBMTCP-L@PUCC.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"IBMTCP-L@PUCC.BITNET",RUBEN
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 14:48:00 GMT-0200
From:         Ruben Ribeiro UNICAMP/BR <RUBEN@CCVAX.UNICAMP.BR>
Subject:      How to allocate file ?

Hi,

Is there a command like LOCSITE in MVS to allocate a file in CMS?
An user asked me and I can't help him.
When he did FTP to another host, he cannot get a file because its
lrecl was 240 and some lines was truncated.

Thanks,
Ruben

========================================================================
Ruben Ribeiro                   Internet: RUBEN@CCVAX.UNICAMP.BR
Connectivity Support              Bitnet: RUBEN@BRUC
State University of Campinas       Voice:       (0192) 39-7135 R 32
Sao Paulo - Brazil                   Fax:       (0192) 39-8450
========================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:06:42 CET
From:         Steve Perez <perezs@WORMS-EMH6.ARMY.MIL>
Subject:      Re: IBMLink

Thanks to Colegate Spinks, Bill Webber, and Doug Kimble for their replies
to my question on Internet access to IBMLink, even though it wasn't what
I would of liked to hear.

As for commercial uses of the Internet....I have to admit that I didn't
consider this. I can see how making use of the configurators, sales info and
other marketing stuff could be seen as a violation of the spirit of Internet.
But I don't see the Internet community getting up in arms over something
like this (if I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will let me know).

Anyway, seems like IBM should change their position and provide the link, so
my request is going in.

Steve

P.S., if anyone is interested...I did win my bet. But I can't gloat...after
all, I had an unfair advantage....thanks guys.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Office of University Computing
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 12:52:49 EST
From:         Nick Laflamme <NLAFLAMM@IRISHVMA.BITNET>
Subject:      SMTP: 451 message clogs queue

A V2R2 SMTP server on VM was asked to deliver a message from another
BITNET site to a local address.  For unknown reasons, the local system
returned a 451 message, "[ Connection timed out ] Nameserver timeout for
'@vma.cc.nd.edu:XXXXXXX@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU" during the SMTP transaction.

SMTP on VM then proceeded to let all other notes to that same system
queue up behind it.  When I restarted SMTP, it tried that first note,
got the same 451 message, and never tried any of the other (750 by
the time I caught on) messages queued for the same system.

Shouldn't SMTP be able to put aside an offending note and try another?
I realize some errors would be systematic, not note-specific, but in
this case, *someone* (programmer writing one or the other of the servers)
should have known that this error shouldn't have disabled that whole
queue.

Would anyone care to comment on whether the problem is with VM's SMTP
server for not persevering with other notes or with the other STMP
service for returning a misleading error message?  I don't know if 451 is
the right message prefix for that situation.

Thanks,
Nick

* NLAFLAMM@IRISHVMA.BITNET
* Dominique.P.Laflamme.1@nd.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:30:27 -0500
From:         "TCP/IP Maintenance (408) 656-3313" <TCPMAINT@NAVPGS.BITNET>
Subject:      Is ALTTCPHOSTNAME repeatable?

We are changing both the hostname and IP address of our mainframe, but
want the old name to be recognized for a 2-month period after the new
name is valid.  Our host's BITNET name is NAVPGS; SMTP CONFIG says
  ...
GATEWAY                ; accept mail from and deliver mail to RSCS hosts
RSCSDOMAIN BITNET      ; pseudo domain name of associated RSCS network
LOCALFORMAT PUNCH      ; local recipients receive mail in Punch format
RSCSFORMAT PUNCH       ; RSCS recipients receive mail in Punch format
REWRITE822HEADER YES   ; Only set to no if you do not want SMTP to
;
ALTTCPHOSTNAME cc.nps.navy.mil
;
MAILER MAILER@NAVPGS NEW LOCAL RSCS UNKNOWN

I'd like to add a second ALTTCPHOSTNAME as vm1.cc.nps.navy.mil (the new name)
so that SMTP will quit refusing mail to the new name, yet still accept mail
to the old name.  Page 130 of SC31-6082 (Installation and Maintenance)
describes the ALTTCPHOSTNAME statement, but doesn't say if it is repeatable.
Has anyone done it?  Thanks for the information.
----------
    Caroline Miller, Postmaster        TCPMAINT@VM1.CC.NPS.NAVY.MIL
    IBM Systems Programmer             Naval Postgraduate School, Code 51
    (408) 656-3313                     Monterey, CA  93943-5000
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 11:20:05 MST
From:         Sharon Dickson <KHAAZ@ASUACAD.BITNET>

Is anyone using the BTI ELC3 box with 2 e-net adapters and FDDI?  If so,
would you please share your experiences.  We would like to connect one
VM (FAL 2.2) system running VM/XA and one MVS (HAL 2.2.0) running ESA 4.2.2.
Thanks in advance.

Sharon Dickson
System Programmer
Arizona State University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 16:53:30 EST
From:         Bill Rubin <rubinm@WATSON.IBM.COM>
Subject:      Re: NETSTAT Reports Incorrect Data

Alice Jackson writes:

>   Another time, our ethernet LAN controller was not working, but
> NETSTAT DEVLINKS showed it to be in a READY status (its status at
> TCPIP startup).
>   I have reported both of these problems to IBM Support, but they
> tell me NETSTAT only looks at control blocks that TCP/IP builds
> before setting up the session, and those control blocks are not
> updated if session establishment fails.  In the case of the device,
> the control block is built at TCPIP startup time, and not updated
> if there is a change in device status.

As I recall, in the case of your device, you had gotten some sort of a
channel error and TCP/IP itself didn't even realize that the device was
unavailable.  I find it hard to believe that the support center told you
that the device information is not updated after startup time because it's
simply not true.  We report the state as we know it.  If your device goes
down and TCP/IP knows about it, it reports it when you do a NETSTAT
because NETSTAT works off the real control blocks within the TCP/IP
address space.  I would doubt that if you looked in TCP/IP's log that you
would see any messages about the device going away in this case, either.

Now, the case can be made that perhaps there should be some way for TCP/IP
to ensure that it always finds out when device errors occur, even channel
errors of the sort that you saw.  Personally, I always thought that it
did.

As for the NETSTAT TELNET problem, I am not sure how a TELNET session
would go away but we would not know about it.  I do know that if we pass
you off to an LU and you get passed to another application, TCP/IP does
not find out about it and as such it will not be reflected in the NETSTAT
output.  In that case, a VTAM query would be the appropriate method to get
the current information, not NETSTAT.

Bill Rubin
IBM TJ Watson Research
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
From: SYS0008@MVS.UDEL.EDU
Subject: re: apar 30384
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 15:18:00 GMT

In article <IBMTCP-L%92121613550721@PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU>,
Ron Lane <RONLANE@YKTVMV.BITNET> writes:

>An append yesterday mentioned the 'security problems' with
>apar 30384 with FTP in release 2.2.1.  The extent of this problem
>is that sometimes, though not too often, a person will be
>doing a DIR under the authority of another userid because the
>TCBSENV ACEE field has not been cleared up from a previous
>user, and because DIR did set the TCBSENV field itself to change it.
>This does not affect GET and PUT, because they always change the
>TCBSENV field when they run.
>
>Ron Lane
>TCP/IP Development

In our situation, both GETS and PUTS were affected as well.  (that's how
we found the problem;  users were complaining of RACF violations on
datasets that they owned when doing GETS and PUTS.)

For us, the problem is not related to "occasional" DIR commands; once
the FTP server gets into that condition all connections seem to have the
authority of that previous user.  Restarting the server was the only way
we could figure out how to get out of the situation.  We didn't think
that 30384 sounded like our problem, but level 2 insisted it's the
same...

Shawn.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU