HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 22:09:12 GMT

In article <lkmfquINN1ph@news.bbn.com> dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>In article <1993Jan5.230959.17783@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>>  
>> Only two dozen full-time SF authors?  That sounds extremely low; where
>> did you get that figure?
>
>Edward's at least approximately right here, Trygve.  The key word is
>"full time."  Most of the authors that you plunk down the five bucks to
>read work at least part time in bookstores or as teachers or whatever.
>Even some of the ones who seem very successful when measured by shelf
>space at Waldens still can't afford to quit their day job, or only
>write full time for a year or three before they decide that they'd 
>prefer to write part time.

OK, I'll buy that--but I still argue that the small number of full-time
SF authors isn't a good reason for why Edward can't get a date who
isn't obsessed with physical fitness.

Trygve   (Personally, I think there's a lot to be said for physically
          fit dates--in particular, it doesn't take nearly as long for
          them to work up a reasonable amount of endurance.)

--
The Meese Report on Pornography II, the Sequel by the same old guys down at
the White House.  The only government report ever to become a best-seller
was also so much fun to write that they came out with a sequel.  Features
nearly 600 pages of the raciest dialog and blow-by-blow scene descriptions
of every triple-X flic made up to 1989.  A must for the serious triple-X
movie buff.                                   Pub at $67.50  /  Only $66.75

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
Subject: Re: rON bashing
Reply-To: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
Organization: North Carolina State University
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 20:28:50 GMT

In article <1993Jan3.201200.5081@netcom.com> 
aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:

> <sigh>  Can't we all just drop this whole
> subject, and go back to flaming each other personally, 
> rather than for the group they happen to belong to?

But first we have to allow "rON" some time to vent his 
frustations at women who would never consider going out 
with him. 

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: Can't let go of her
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 21:15:42 GMT

In article <1iab58INNbmi@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> loosemore-sandra@cs.yale.edu (Sandra Loosemore) writes:
>markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>   There are three logical choices.  (1) Attempt to win her back, or force the
>   situation in some other way; (2) Find another lover after grieving; or
>   (3) Remain alone and grieve.
>You missed one:
>(4) Finish grieving, but still be alone.

How about:

1) Make some new friends and go do stuff with them.
2) Go to any parties that you're invited to and try to
   meet as many new people as possible
3) Learn a musical instrument or teach someone to play one
4) Go on nature hikes and learn to make great tea from
   common plants
5) Go to a craft store and buy a small kit that looks interesting,
   take it home, and make something.  (Those puffy paints that you
   put on clothing are neat; you can make ordinary tee-shirts and
   Keds look awesome)
6) Learn to make expresso or capuccino or get a coffee grinder and
   experiment with new and different kinds of coffee.
7) If you see a total stranger who is wearing an article of jewelry
   that you think is the neatest thing you've ever seen, tell them so.
   Just say "Wow, that is the NEATEST necklace!" and continue on your
   way.  Later on you'll feel really good.
8) Subscribe to a dirty magazine and don't tell ANYONE.
9) Get a part-time job at a fast-food joint and be as nice as
   you can to everyone.
10) Get two kittens (litter-mates, preferrably) and let them adopt
    you.
11) Learn to make some kind of craft that people would want to buy, and
    sell it at craft shows.

And on and on.
-- 
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Nance Colucci                                      att!ihlpl!colucci
"It'll be better than before.  Yesterday's gone.  Yesterday's gone!"
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
From: martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Meeting guys
Followup-To: soc.singles
Date: 11 Jan 93 10:05:59
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
	<Jan.11.02.27.21.1993.11528@andromeda.rutgers.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hatteras.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: capistra@andromeda.rutgers.edu's message of 11 Jan 93 07:27:26 GMT

In article <Jan.11.02.27.21.1993.11528@andromeda.rutgers.edu> capistra@andromeda.rutgers.edu (M-A-H-L-O-N-A) writes:

   >Well, if you like mildly geeky middle aged over-intellectual white boys,
   >there's always me.

   HAHAHA!  Good one!  :)

*snif*  They're laughing at me.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
From: jsmt@troi.cc.rochester.edu (Julia Smith)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Can't let go of her
Date: 5 Jan 93 02:32:36 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester (Rochester, NY)

In article <1iab58INNbmi@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> loosemore-sandra@cs.yale.edu (Sandra Loosemore) writes:
>markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>
>   There are three logical choices.  (1) Attempt to win her back, or force the
>   situation in some other way; (2) Find another lover after grieving; or
>   (3) Remain alone and grieve.
>
>You missed one:
>
>(4) Finish grieving, but still be alone.
 
Then there are the choices so commonly followed by folks around
the university, namely:
1)  Pretend you are fine, get involved with someone, and self-destruct,
    carrying the unsuspecting someone down with you.
2)  Piss, moan, rage, and otherwise bewail the inhumanity of the appropriate
    gendered person, all such gendered persons, and generically all persons
    who attempt to come within yards of you.
3)  Blame it all on your parents.
4)  drink or otherwise alter your consciousness to the point of unconsciousness.
    repeat until dead, deranged, or a glimmer remnant of common sense takes
    over.
5)  Smash things.

<disclaimer - these solutions, and the myriad others observed over time
              attempted by those in your shoes, do not "help" in any way.
              However, in the interest of even-handedness, it seemed
              appropriate to list, along with the reasonably healthy options
              provided so far on the net, those options more commonly 
              pursued by actual human beings.  Your milage may vary.>
  
--j
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Car Alarms (oh, no, not again!)
Date: 6 Jan 93 20:03:29 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1993Jan5.133606.14138@b8.b8.ingr.com> larry@b8.b8.ingr.com (Larry Billings) writes:
>In article <1993Jan5.041009.9734@panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
|> 
|> It shows a car, parked along a street, with a loud obnoxious alarm
|> going.  On the side of the car is a little box, labelled "Turn off
|> alarm, 75 cents".
|> 
|> Seth
|
|I like it.... Now WHERE do I get one of those???
 
Hey Billings, you're treading on thin ice there pal.

John "do I really need the smiley"
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max)
Subject: Re: Seeking female companion
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 12:49:29 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.045754.27978@fuug.fi> an4928@anon.penet.fi writes:
>
>  Hello !
>
>         I would like to meet single female around Boston Area in the age
>    group of 25-30. 
>
>
>        Myself , a s/w engineer 28. 
>
>    Please respond, if interested in more info....
>
>   With best wishes.
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
>Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
>and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.


Isn't this the second or third one of these anonymous posting service
messages to reach s.s.? Is there some way we can reach whoever is running
this thing and let them know that this is not the appropriate groupt to
post this stuff too?

Max
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex
From: taernst@glasses.Princeton.EDU (Ted Ernst)
Subject: Re: The Classiest Pickup Lines
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 17:12:03 GMT

In article <1993Jan8.012714.18701@borland.com> eomiya@borland.com (Elliot Omiya) writes:
>My line was "Hi, gorgeous"
>
>(Hey, it worked, you gotta consider it in context!)
>
>
"Do you sleep on your stomach?  Mind if I do?"


Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women,soc.men,ba.singles
From: oleg@netcom.com (Oleg Kiselev)
Subject: Re: Duck and Jive (was Re: Pre-Sex Contract )
Followup-To: soc.singles,soc.women,soc.men
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 07:35:07 GMT

In article <1993Jan4.114503.5203@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> bhv@areaplg2.corp.mot.com (Bronis Vidugiris) writes:
>Nah.  Actually, I've seen the same 'assertion' this argument is allegedly
>about posted elsewhere on the net.  

"I have seen it on the NET -- it must be true!"

>I'm fairly sure it's true, too.

"I think it's true -- it must be true!"

>I
>haven't actually seen any *references* for the percentage of unmarried
>mothers who do not name the father quoted with verifiable sources, though.

"I have no data to base this assrtion on -- but I know it's true!"

>I really belive that ....

What you believe is irrelevant.  If you don't have the data to base it on,
you are not presenting a credible assertion.

>)My "opinion" is that you are an idiot.  You are not surprized, I hope.
>You seem to be a bit confused about the difference between a personal
>insult and an opinion.

No, not at all.  It really is my opinion.  If you wish to take that as an
insult, I will not attempt to dissuade you.

>Unless you can raise
>the caliber of your argument a bit or at least flame in a manner that's more
>cogent than insult-hurling I will have to bid you adieu.  

Nope.  This is as much cerebral cortex activity as you rate, Bronis.
-- 
Oleg Kiselev at home			...use the header to find the path
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Meeting women in clubs
Date: 12 Jan 93 19:03:31 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <JMD.93Jan11141956@lion.bear.com>, jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond) writes:
| Here in western civilization (oxymoron, I know) we seem to have a
| major problem with the inability to make and maintain eye contact with
| another person.  

Yea, it's difficult to make eye contact when they're stareing at my crotch.

-John

Xref: sparky soc.singles:35559 alt.romance:15756
From: bobert@informix.com (Robert Murphy)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance
Subject: Re: Meeting guys
Date: 6 Jan 93 20:58:25 GMT
Organization: Informix Software, Inc.

macl6441@mach1.wlu.ca (macleod heather) writes:
>I've been reading a lot lately here about how men should go about meeting
>women, but nobody seems to be giving many suggestions on how women can meet
>men.  I ended a four year relationship a month ago, and I'm ready to meet
>someone new, but I'm not really comfortable with the bar scene.  There are
>guys in some of my classes, but I'm pretty shy.  Can someone give me some
>advice?
>Thanks!!

It may be a little cold for this right now in Waterloo, but my standard
response to this question is, "Join a bicycling club".

I used to belong to the Fort Worth Bicycling Association, which was about
80+% men, mostly well-educated, single, friendly, and in good physical
shape :^).  They typically ran a dozen or so rides a week, ranging from
gonzo 200-mile ultramarathons to five-mile on-the-bike-path fun rides that
began and ended at a local bar where the group stopped afterward for a drink.
Single women who went on the rides or attended the meetings were always
treated with both friendly attention and respect, no matter whether they
were experienced bicyclists or out-of-shape neophytes.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: GCTHORNE@idbsu.idbsu.edu (Broward Horne)
Subject:      RE:  Where did I meet my end?
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 17:44:45 MST
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA28734; Mon, 11 Jan 93 16:50:15 -0800
X-Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA12213; Mon, 11 Jan 93 16:50:12 -0800
X-Received: from IDBSU.IDBSU.EDU by idbsu.idbsu.edu (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 6809; Mon, 11 Jan 93 17:52:03 MST
X-Received: from IDBSU (GCTHORNE) by IDBSU.IDBSU.EDU (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id
 7326; Mon, 11 Jan 93 17:52:03 MST
X-To: soc.singles.usenet

From: Catherine.Collingwood@launchpad.unc.edu (Catherine Collingwood)
Subject: Re: Where did I meet my SO?
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service

>Where did I meet my SO (now my fiance)???
>Hmm..that's an interesting question...

>We're getting married sometime in 1995.
>Anyone else?

            What, you need TWO husbands?

   Where did I meet my SO&SO?

   The Net.

       How appropriate.
          How typical.

   I'm done.  The pickings have gotten too slim, and there be
   way too much unreality and foolishness.

   She broke her arm last week.

      Not a tear.
        Not a moan.

     " It's making strange sounds.  I think it's broken ".   <twist>

     < snap >   < crackle >   < pop >

   Egads! I thought.  She really *IS* a Terminator, sent to destroy me!

   Christ.  Triple fracture, even.

   She proposed to me on New Year's Eve.

   Hey, they don't make this model anymore, chums.

   hehehehehe.
Xref: sparky soc.singles:36021 alt.sex:41629
From: urlichs@smurf.sub.org (Matthias Urlichs)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex
Subject: Re: The Classiest Pickup Lines
Date: 11 Jan 1993 12:52:40 +0100
Organization: University of Karlsruhe, FRG
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1

In alt.sex, article <1993Jan11.101437.1@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz>,
  quirke_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz writes:
> 
>  Still, sounds like a funny sketch, save if one of the chumps in question was
> watching with his family...
> 
As far as I know, everybody who is "featured" in those sketches is asked for
permission (afterwards of course ;-).

-- 
The dossier is not the person.
                                        -- Dr. John Gall
-- 
Matthias Urlichs  --  urlichs@smurf.sub.org -- urlichs@smurf.ira.uka.de   /(o\
Humboldtstrasse 7 -- 7500 Karlsruhe 1 -- Germany  --  +49-721-9612521     \o)/
Xref: sparky soc.singles:36237 ba.singles:3096
From: charleen@net.bio.net (Charleen Bunjiovianna)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,ba.singles
Subject: Re: Colorado/Silicon Valley  (Was: Re: Timeless beauty)
Date: 12 Jan 93 17:10:39 GMT
Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for Biology

In article <1993Jan12.064412.8589@informix.com> aland@informix.com (Colonel Panic) writes:
>In article <1993Jan10.030039.27117@netcom.com> rohwerwd@netcom.com (W. David Rohwer) writes:
>
>>     My major observation is that the people in Colorado are a lot friendlier
>>and helpful than the people here in Silicon Valley.  

>Then, I thought: how much of this do I practice back at home on a daily
>basis?  Is *my* attitude really the same back at home?  What would happen
>if I practiced a little proactive friendliness back home?
>
>Turns out there were a LOT of little "friendliness opportunities" I was
>ignoring day-to-day back here.
>
>How much do *you* practice of this back home, hmmmmmm?

Haven't you heard?  W. is so friendly that he shoves a contract
and a pen under the nose of any woman benighted enough to consider
sleeping with him.

I'm a bit surprised he didn't make the snowmobilers sign a liability
waiver before he helped them get their machines unstuck.  Hey, W.,
you missed a bet there.

The folks in my small town (Hood River, Oregon) are much friendlier and
much more helpful than yer run-of-the-mill Silicon Valley yahoo, but
that's because they know each other, they know the community, and they
know that in order to survive, they depend on each other.  Sure, some
of that warmth rubs off on the occasional yahoo passing through who
gets stuck in the snow.  Sometimes he decides it's so charming that he
buys a house in the valley and settles down.  Then he finds out about
the flip side of the coin:  fear, hatred, and distrust of
people-not-from-here.  In the small town where I grew up, "Californian"
is an insult and an obscenity.

Charleen
From: dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Date: 6 Jan 1993 20:21:50 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

In article <1993Jan5.230959.17783@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>  
> in <ewright.726256682@convex.convex.com>
>     ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>  
> Only two dozen full-time SF authors?  That sounds extremely low; where
> did you get that figure?

Edward's at least approximately right here, Trygve.  The key word is
"full time."  Most of the authors that you plunk down the five bucks to
read work at least part time in bookstores or as teachers or whatever.
Even some of the ones who seem very successful when measured by shelf
space at Waldens still can't afford to quit their day job, or only
write full time for a year or three before they decide that they'd 
prefer to write part time.

I suspect that it has more to do with the economics of publishing than
it does with the popularity of science fiction.  I wonder how many
full time mystery or romance writers there are?  Or mainstream or
"literary" writers, for that matter?  I was told by my writing professor
that there were more full time SF writers than there were mainstream
writers, but that was a long time ago and it's possible that he was
just griping himself (he was a mainstream writer.)

Dawn
"What if I had PMS all my life, and told you you looked just like Barney Fife,
What if I twisted it in like a knife, Until it made you cry? Until it made
you lie? Would you still love me?"
"What If..." by Bongwater
From: ljhr@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Canasta Question
Date: 11 Jan 93 16:37:18 -0500

I ddidn;t know where to post this.  Sorry.

Does anybody out there play canasta?  I'm trying to learn and I have a few
questions.  Nobody here plays.  Thanks in advance.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: larry@b8.b8.ingr.com (Larry Billings)
Subject: Re: Car Alarms (oh, no, not again!)
Organization: Intergraph
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 13:36:06 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.041009.9734@panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
> 
> It shows a car, parked along a street, with a loud obnoxious alarm
> going.  On the side of the car is a little box, labelled "Turn off
> alarm, 75 cents".
> 
> Seth

I like it.... Now WHERE do I get one of those???

-- 
Larry

             This .sig file has been purposely left blank.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (dreas)
Subject: Re: DWM ISO S/D*F in SF BAy Area
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 93 04:31:07 GMT

In article lkrsgmINNdpn@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM, Doug () writes:
>Hi,

Hello.

>I'm a DWM, 29 years who just recently graduated and moved to the
>Bay area.  I have blue eyes and sandy blond hair.  I weigh around 
>175 and am 5'10 1/2".  I like all outdoor activities. Those I have
>not done before, I'm willing to try.  I love animals and long walks
>on the beach.  I enjoy people who have a good sense of humor.

Oh My!

>I would like to meet a S/D*F who is 25-32 and lives in the SF 
>Bay area.

Yahoo! You win a prize! 
All kindsa HotBabes live in yer NeckOfTheWoods!
 
> Someone who cares about their body.  Not necessarily a 
>health nut, but someone who stays physically fit and is conscious about 
>the condition of their body. 

Oh, a *picky* NiceGuy[TM].
Your prize is a clue. 

CLUE: This clue can be used as a down payment on a life.
      What's a life you ask? A life is the thing you're
      looking for, otherwise you wouldn't have posted.
      Warning: This clue can be wasted, and if it is, you
      will never have a hope of getting a life. This clue 
      can be used once only and only once. Do the wise thing
      and send me your FirstBorn when your life is paid in full.

dreas

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: C558172@mizzou1.missouri.edu
Subject: Re: M: F birth ratio (Was Re: Newspaper "personals")
Organization: University of Missouri
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 12:10:29 CST

In article <1iptuqINNlid@uwm.edu>
markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
 
>
>In article <1ih8b8INN5gg@mirror.digex.com> huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston) writes:
>>It wouldn't work.  Here in the U.S. there are 102 male newborns for every
>>100 female newborns, but higher mortality among the males leads to a 1:1
>>ratio at the age of sexual maturity.  However, after World War II the birth
>>ratio climbed to 103:100 briefly.
>
>In article <1993Jan8.113845.16121@spider.co.uk> ivan@spider.co.uk (Ivan Reid) writes:
>>I thought that there are slightly more women born than men - male births are
>>slightly more likely to miscarry. Anyone have any references?
>
>More males are born than females.  Males outnumber females at all ages until
>around 40-50.  And males and females had the same life expectancy till about
>1900-1920, and still do, except that for some reason the male life expectancy
>curve got to be a couple decades behind the females', resulting in an apparent
>5-10 year vertical gap or so.  It's been evening back out though since the 70's.
Could you back this up? I was under the impression that more males are
*conceived* than females, but by the time of birth there are 100 females to
96? males. The ratio gets better (worse?) from there.
You might be thinking of the ratio of "available" (not married, etc.) females
to males which is in favor of the females since women tend to marry younger
(obviously to older guys).
--Shannon  "my toe hurts" Kohl
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: Where did you meet your SO?
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 13:45:59 GMT

In article <16298@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <1993Jan7.213306.23501@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>|so I called the photography department and talked
>|to this really-nice-sounding guy and he gave me all this information about
>|how photo documentation is done, and we made an appointment.
>
>This reminded me of something I was meaning to bring up.  In Nancy's case the
>relationship is with a co-worker (albeit, at a really large company). Actually,
>it sounds like "twoookums" is more of a "customer" than a coworker ...

No, it doesn't sound that way at all.  One, we were working on the same
project in the same company and two, "my people" were paying "his people" for
the photography services.  That makes twookums (that's one o, John) the
vendor and ME the "customer", yes?

And he went about it correctly.  He, as the "vendor", asked me, the "customer"
out to lunch.  Perfectly normal chain of events to occur after spending all
morning working and chatting together.
-- 
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Nance Colucci                                      att!ihlpl!colucci
"I'm a writer.  Be nice, or you'll wake up one day and be a story."
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Newsgroups: soc.singles