HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer)
Newsgroups: soc.motss,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: NEWSWEEK POLL: Plurality of Americans support GAY RIGHTS
Date: 11 Sep 92 17:12:25 GMT
Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA

In article <1992Sep10.092152.507@resonex.com>, michael@resonex.com (Michael Bryan) writes:
> In article <12194@optilink.UUCP> cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:
> >Most Americans support Equal Rights for homosexuals, myself included.
> 
> Hurrah!  C.C. supports same-sex marriages!  Or is that not included
> as an "Equal Right"?
> 
> Michael Bryan  michael@resonex.com  "Milk and Cheese in '92!"  |     ,_,

You know that 78% of Americans don't support state-sanctioned
homosexual marriages, because the survey asked that question also,
and got a much lower number.

I would prefer that the government got out of the marriage business
completely.
-- 
Clayton E. Cramer {uunet,pyramid}!optilink!cramer  My opinions, all mine!
Alcohol prohibition didn't work; drug prohibition doesn't work; gun
prohibition won't work.
From: dcoster@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David P. Coster)
Newsgroups: soc.motss,princeton.grad,princeton.general
Subject: Princeton LGBA
Date: 11 Sep 92 16:29:14 GMT
Distribution: princeton
Organization: Princeton University
Originator: news@nimaster


Princeton Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Alliance
============================================

Meeting for everybody:  Wed 16, 19:00-21:00, Murray-Dodge Cafe

Weekly meetings will start the following Monday, men in Murray-Dodge,
women at the Women's Centre.

If you want to come along to an informal men's meeting this Monday,
show up at Murray-Dodge at 19:30 (we can discuss plans for the coming
year).

Dave.

PS Queries to the LGBA Office 8-4522.

-- 
David Coster
dcoster@princeton.edu
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: buckmr@vccnw03.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire)
Subject: Re: Catholic Church's Letter to American Bishops.
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 22:37:51 GMT

chrisa@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (C. G. Albone) writes:

>	I remember reading a whiles back on the net that
>someone had transcribed (or had pointers to) the recent 
>letter from the Catholic Church to bishops to do with things
>Queer. Could some kind soul send me a copy if they have it,
>or give me a pointer as to where it can be found?
It's in /pub/QRD/qrd/text/original-vatican.text on nifty.andrew.cmu.edu,
available by anonymous ftp.
-- 
RON BUCKMIRE, 11 Colvin Circle, Troy, NY 12180-3735.  ***Clinton-Gore 92!***
uunet!rpi.edu!buckmr||buckmr@rpitsmts.bitnet||buckmr@rpi.edu||+1 518 276 8910
PrinceMADONNAMariahCareySineadO'ConnorGeorgeMichaelKateBushEnyaCocteauTwins
MTVCNNFOXNBCCBSVH1RobertBarnardIsaacAsimovGoreVidalGlennCloseMerylStreep
From: tachyon@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Tane' Tachyon)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: boobs
Date: 13 Sep 1992 00:57:53 GMT
Organization: Tachyon Labs
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucscb.ucsc.edu


In article <1992Sep11.014944.14298@auto-trol.com> katbea@auto-trol.com (Kathy Beatty) writes:
>Okay, NY-NJ motssers - up until at least a few years ago (last time I 
>was there) there was a "Dyke Lumber Co." off to the left as you entered
>one of the tunnels from the Jersey side. Which tunnel, and is it still
>there?

This is a chain ... there's some lesbian comic who did a bit 
about going there and complaining "where are the babes?!?!?"


-- 
 ____________________________________________________________________________
|tachyon@deeptht.armory.com  \        /__    One of the Bivariant Illuminati |
|      tachyon@ucscb.ucsc.edu  \    /   /  One of these days I should log off|
|         tachyon@gorn.echo.com  \/   /  and get some work done ... nahh ... |
 ----------------------------------\/----------------------------------------
From: jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: equal opportunity cheesecake
Date: 10 Sep 92 04:59:07 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

The article below was in rec.motorcycles: 

In article <18mdcjINN2ma@cs.utexas.edu> osborn@cs.utexas.edu (John Howard Osborn) writes:
>In article <716072270.227687.TJM@math.ams.org> TJM@MATH.AMS.ORG (Tom Maloney) writes:
>>	I wonder if there's a market for magazines featuring bits 
>>	of male beef posing (semi-)nude on Harleys.  I'd buy 'em.
>
>I've actually been thinking about the possibilities of publishing
>a gay(*) motorcycling magazine.  Do you think a market for that
>sort of thing exists?  Heh, I bet this idea is making more than
>a few breeders uncomfortable as they read it...
>
>(*) Of course I mean Gay, Les, Bi, etc.
>
>In a similar vein, the latest (?) issue of, I think, "Texas Iron"
>has a fairly hunky UTexas swimmer on the cover with his Harley.
>I just wish he was wearing as little as the bikini-clad fem
>with him.
>
>As I rant on, just what IS the deal with bikini-clad women in high heels?
>They seem to infest motorcycle posters, motorcycle magazines, car
>magazines, and calendars featuring airplanes to drilling equipment.
>Do hets *really* find the heels-bikini combo sexy?  Even when holding
>a pipe wrench?
>
>-
>-John H. Osborn
>-osborn@cs.utexas.edu
>-DOD# 2001  '92 BMW Paris-Dakar

I haven't seen such a magazine, but I haven't been looking, either.  I
wouldn't count skin magazines with men posing on motorcycles.

While we're we're talking about high heels, does anyone know the story
behind that computer ad with the big burly construction worker holding a
jack hammer (I wish), wearing bright red high heels?  Doesn't seem like
something a straight man would think up, although a straight woman might. 
Well, maybe a very secure straight man - there are a few of those. 

-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Hamilton   jfh@netcom.com   P. O. Box 281107   SF, CA   94128-1107
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: shore@dinah.tc.cornell.edu (Melinda Shore)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: accordion bashing
Date: 14 Sep 92 22:50:51 GMT
Organization: Cornell Theory Center

In article <1992Sep14.205312.11166@panix.com> ro@panix.com (r l reid) writes:
>Well, I'm still paying attention, waiting for Pauline Oliveros to get mentioned.
>Dunno if that has motss content or not - tho she is a queer bird.

Yes, indeedy.  She's come up in the past, in the 'gay
composers' thread.

I wasn't aware that she'd written for accordion.
--
       Melinda Shore - Cornell Theory Center - shore@tc.cornell.edu
From: carlton@husc10.harvard.edu (david carlton)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Orson Scott Card
Date: 6 Sep 92 05:27:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: husc10.CARLTON.92Sep5222747
 <1992Sep5.191700.15095@Princeton.EDU> <1992Sep5.195538.12836@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Organization: Citizens for Boysenberry Jam
In-reply-to: lfoard@Turing.ORG's message of Sat, 5 Sep 1992 19:55:38 GMT

In article <1992Sep5.195538.12836@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, lfoard@Turing.ORG (Lawrence C. Foard) writes:
> In article <1992Sep5.191700.15095@Princeton.EDU> spencer@phoenix.princeton.edu (S. Spencer Sun) writes:

>>[In response to requests for the Orson Scott Card article]
>>
>>Didn't someone post a while back (a few months actually now that I think
>>about it) that Mr. Card had specifically ordained that his article NOT
>>be redistributed, on penalty of nasty legal action?  I seem to remember
>>seeing something along these lines.

> Do any lawyers out there know if speech can be supressed in this fashion?

I'm not a lawyer, but of course it can.  You are allowed to copyright
your work and forbid others to reproduce it.

> Its certainly not libel unless OSC is claiming not to have written the
> article.

True.

> I see all sorts of articles quoted all the time, would it be
> legal to paraphrase it and quote important statements?

Yes.  Copyright law does allow paraphrase, and quoting is allowed as
well, as long as you don't quote too much.

david carlton
carlton@husc.harvard.edu

       Boys, you have ALL been selected to LEAVE th' PLANET in 15
       minutes!!
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: cal@ee.ryerson.ca (Calvin Henry-Cotnam)
Subject: Re: sunglasses and hats
Organization: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute, Toronto
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 01:42:59 GMT

In article <1992Sep11.202854.674@quantime.co.uk> roger@quantime.co.uk (Roger Phillips) writes:
>In article <1992Sep11.023533.25839@ee.ryerson.ca>,
>Let me try: hereditary heliophobic spasmatical sternutation?
>
>-- 

I know this was not it, but it did contain "helio".
It certainly did not contain "phobic", as this has nothing to
do with fear.

If it helps, I do remember the word "involuntary" being in it also.
And I believe the first word (there may have been 5 in total) was
a form of the word "genetic". (I dunno, maybe "geneto" ? )

Cal.
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: rjwill6@PacBell.COM (Rod Williams)
Subject: Re: Torch Song Trilogy on TV last night
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Francisco
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 22:01:06 GMT

> adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:
>> mara@panix.com (Mara Chibnik) writes:

>> Among the sponsors were General Mills, Toyota, Procter & Gamble
>> (Ivory), Home Depot, Gillette, Meinecke, Boku (which I may be
>> misspelling), the New Jersey Lottery (!), and-- believe it or 
>> not-- MacDonald's.
>
>You shouldn't be all that surprised about McDonald's.  Mrs. Kroc 
>(whose first name I can't ever remember), the person who *owns* 
>McDonald's, has tried to make up for the harm her husband did when 
>he gave money to rightwing causes by giving money to AIDS research
>among other good causes.

Joan Kroc.  She was a co-founder, with Norman Lear, of People
for the American Way, the "liberal" (I put it in quotes
because it seems so wimpy a word without 'em.  Odd that it
strikes such terror into apparently most American hearts
these days :-() answer to the Religious Right.  Last time I
was in San Diego (where Bush still tops the polls |-P), a
friend pointed out a strikingly beautiful building on a
distant ridge-top, and said it was a new AIDS hospice, built
with Joan's money.  She also owns the San Diego Padres(?),
though that's not necessarily A Good Thing...
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
rod williams -=- pacific bell -=- san francisco -=- rjwill6@pacbell.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: soc.motss,talk.politics.misc,ca.politics
From: michael@resonex.com (Michael Bryan)
Subject: Re: The Harrassing Phone Calls Can Stop NOW!
Organization: Resonex Inc., Sunnyvale CA
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 00:50:35 GMT

In article <12234@optilink.UUCP> cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:
>In article <1992Sep10.085725.19348@quantime.co.uk>, roger@quantime.co.uk (Roger Phillips) writes:
># Such as handing over what you think is damning evidence
># to those people who want to legislate us out of existence?
>
>Oh?  Can you provide some examples?  I have yet to hear any of
>the fundamentalists argue for extermination of homosexuals.

Oh, of course not.  They wouldn't be so *foolish* as to say that!
No, they just want to make sure people understand that it is perfectly
acceptable, in fact, *preferable*, to prevent gays and lesbians
from working or having a place to live.  Nope, they don't want
to exterminate us.  They just want to make it impossible to
live.  *Big* difference.   :-/

-- 
Michael Bryan  michael@resonex.com  "Milk and Cheese in '92!"  |     ,_,
"Lovers are like... dentures.  You don't want them in your     |    /oo \
mouth all night, but you sure as hell want them within arm's   |    <>__|
reach in the morning!"  --- Miss Elmira Gulch                  |    |  U|
From: wood@siemens.com. (Jim Wood)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Gay Cops and 60 Minutes
Date: 15 Sep 92 14:12:17 GMT

bobsarv@microsoft.com (Bob Sarver) writes:

>Did anyone else see the "60 Minutes" piece last night on gay cops?

>During the course of the conversation with a group of SF gay cops, one
>of the officers commented that they were just as good as the straight
>folks, and lived pretty normal lives--they were just gay, and they were
>cops.  Mike Wallace said, "But we've all seen the gay pride parades with
>the prancing and mincing around, people acting out roles and such".  The
>response was "But they're only a tiny minority of our community.  They
>don't represent the mainstream.  WE ARE the mainstream."

It's funny but that was the one statement in the piece to which I take
exception.  There are some things wrong with downplaying their existance.
First, there's nothing wrong with prancing and mincing.  Second, no one
knows just how small or large a group the prancers and mincers are.

>It is so nice to have someone else state exactly what I have been 
>saying.

Are you saying the same thing, which to my estimation is that effeminate
men are not part of the mainstream?  This implies you're saying "they're
not one of us -- they're THEM."

Everyone is one of us -- no IFs, ANDs, or BUTs.  Inclusion is the
rule, dear.

--
Jim Wood [jwood@siemens.siemens.com] (609) 734-3643
"Rise up on the wings of eagles, and two step among the stars.
 You are not forgotten.  Your smile will echo forever."
   -- Ryerson Schwark, to our friend Rob Bernardo.
From: dbidwa@sei.cmu.edu (Daniel Bidwa)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Record trivia
Date: 11 Sep 92 19:04:11 GMT
Organization: The Software Engineering Institute


Bill Hsu (hsu@sp1.csrd.uiuc.edu) sez:
|> There's another less obscure record with 3 grooves on one side. It's
|> by Laurie Anderson (before Big Science), but I can't remember the title
|> right now...

Are you thinking of the two-record set she did with William S. Burroughs and
?Shelby? (sorry, the name's gone) on Giorno Poetry Systems. Each person got
one full side of a record, and they all got one groove on the fourth side.
(Hardly less obscure, though, Bill. And why you posting from that old site
anyway? :-)

There's so many more/less-than-one-groove-per-side records out there that I'm
not even going to start.

d
From: mnorth@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: stonewall organizing conference
Date: 15 Sep 92 15:39:21 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: Georgetown University

For Immediate Release
September 15, 1992

CONTACTS: Steve Ault 718/499-8984, Nicole Ramirez Murray 619/528-
5800 & 692-1967, Howard Wallace 415/861-0318, Gary Wells 414/263-
7187

U.S. ORGANIZING MEETING ANNOUNCED FOR JANUARY 15-17, 1993,
DALLAS, TEXAS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL MARCH ON THE UNITED NATIONS
TO AFFIRM THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF LESBIAN AND GAY PEOPLE, JUNE 26,
1994, NEW YORK CITY

Activists representing lesbian, gay, bisexual and AIDS-related
organizations throughout the U.S. will meet during January 15-17,
1993, in Dallas Texas to help build the International March on
the United Nations to Affirm the Human Rights of Lesbian and Gay
People.  The International March and Rally will be the largest of
several hundred events planned for June and July, 1994, in New
York City and around the world to commemorate the 25th
anniversary of the Stonewall Rebellion.  A Stonewall 25 calendar
of related events will be regularly updated and distributed.

"Letters of invitation to the Stonewall 25 organizing conference
will be sent to every gay, lesbian, bisexual, and AIDS activist
organization for which we have a mailing address.  This process
will begin in September, 1992, and continue as the mailing list
is updated," explained Gary Wells, member of the Stonewall 25
U.S. Conference Planning Committee, and former President of the
Milwaukee Pride Committee.  "The total will be in the thousands. 
We want to get the whole U.S. movement involved in organizing and
decision making," he added.  Pat Norman, another member of the
Conference Planning Committee, who served as co-chair of the 1987
March on Washington for Gay and Lesbian Rights, noted, "We intend
to reach out as broadly as we can.  We are following here the
same process that contributed to the enormous success of the 1987
March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights".

                              #####
Yours Truly
Michael
mnorth@guvax.georgetown.edu
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: glp@fig.citib.com (Greg Parkinson)
Subject: Re: Too straight looking to be gay
Originator: glp@merlin
Organization: Citibank IBISM
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 14:42:48 GMT


In article <1992Sep2.032250.2557@tc.cornell.edu>, shore@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Melinda Shore) writes:
|> In article <vanyel.715396480@camelot> vanyel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alan Williams) writes:
|> >I don't like "nelly" behavior.  Period.  I've received nothing on here to
|> >suggest that I *should*--only flames for not thinking like *you*.  
|> 
|> Oh piffle, poophead.  If it were a simple matter of
|> dislike, you wouldn't feel compelled to share it with
|> 80,000 people.  Why you think that your likes and dislikes
|> should be interesting to any of us eludes me completely;

To someone who wants desperately to be liked,
Melinda's usage of the word "us" would be taken
as complete evidence of a conspiratorial cabal.

To someone who took a few seconds to think about
it, "us" on a system to which anyone with net
access can post can *only* mean "not-you".  By
definition, simply provable.  That's why the
"you suppress ideas other than your own" statements
are met with such derision.  

But then, spare seconds are *so* hard to come by,
rarer even than the neurons whose use would occupy
them.

-- 
Greg Parkinson                  Phone: 212-657-7814  Fax: 212-825-8607
Citibank,111 Wall Street        E-Mail: glp@fig.citib.com
New York, New York  10043
The opinions expressed are my own and not those of the big 'ol bank.
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: foucault@netcom.com (Howard Arthur Faye)
Subject: Re: Is anyone as angry as I am?
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 92 02:44:32 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <1403@dosbears> drp@dosbears.uucp writes:
>In article <Bu1Crr.3Gq@agora.rain.com> batie@agora.rain.com (Alan Batie) writes:
>>wood@siemens.com. (Jim Wood) writes:
>>>If gay people had electoral votes, AIDS would have received the proper
>>>attention it should have many, many years ago.
>>
>>If gay people weren't so f*****g apathetic, we'd *have* the electoral
>>votes.
>
>No, only states have electoral votes. Perhaps if we were more politically
>active we could control more of the general vote, but all of the electoral
>votes from a particular state are voted the way the majority votes.

In practice, usually; in theory this isn't quite true. Each state devises
the method of selecting electors. There are four basic sets of rules (which
I won't bore you with here) but electors are not legally compelled in
most states to act in accordance with the popular majority. People 
are amused by the stray vote for Eliot Richardson or Horace Greely-- but
in theory 270 electors can opt for someone who never appeared on either
a primary or general election ballot.

Perhaps we can 'plant' gay electors and elect Rip Taylor prez. His
confetti is better! And he was once a senate page.
-- 
Howard Arthur Faye * Panglossian Acres * Box 7 * Littlerock, CA   93543
                         Fax: 805.944.5958


Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: fjvwing@cs.vu.nl (FJ!!)
Subject: Re: World's First Known Bottom Found in Alps
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 10:58:57 GMT

rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue) writes:
>In article <x=sndkn.jfh@netcom.com> jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton) writes:
>:In article <1992Sep9.032257.9109@spdcc.com> dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) 
>:writes:
>::"The tight-assed Tyrolean scholars were very uncomfortable even having
>::to acknowledge it," _Lambda_ said, "but Otzi is the first known homosexual
>::man that enjoyed being fucked. ...Otzi was the passive partner--of this
>::there is absolutely no doubt...The sperm has been carbon-dated."
>:That's silly,  What made them think he enjoyed it? 
>	Wouldn't you?

Not always. Certainly not six months ago.

How does anybody know he wasn't raped and killed?

All we know is that there was sperm up his rectum when he died. Saying
anything else about it - even about how it got there - is pure
speculation.

								FJ!!
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: Anthony Perkins
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 11:51:27 GMT


In article <1992Sep13.050603.1588@auto-trol.com>
katbea@auto-trol.com (Kathy Beatty) writes:

>"Psycho" was on AMC last night. I'm glad I watched it. 

When he was a young man, so was I, and I had a terrific
crush on him, I remember.  Something about his
looking-sideways, gosh-saying, stub-your-toe manner got to
me.  I think it was the movie about the ball player Jimmy
Piersall that got me going, despite my most definitely *not*
being a baseball fan.  Innocence and vulnerability, I
suppose it was.  I've discovered that, contrary to popular
belief, you don't run out of innocence as you get older, and
indeed vulnerability increases.  Both of these are not at
all what I expected.  Rest in peace, Tony dear.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
Newsgroups: soc.motss,soc.bi
From: lile@netcom.com (Lile Elam)
Subject: Re: sunglasses and hats
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 92 01:53:36 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

jns@wam.umd.edu (J. N. Shaumeyer) writes:


>Okay, so are there any other closet sun-sneezers
>out there?  Aside from bright sunlight hurting my
>eyes, the constant bouts of sneezing I find
>unnerving.

I think sneezing caused by the sun must be really
cool. I mean, I feel that sneezing is a sign of getting
healthy. :)

Ok, prehaps I take a child's view of alot of things but
the children within me are very much alive which is great.

>What about both?  I have a hard time doing without
>the sunglasses, and I certainly like hats as well.

>No fear--if it's you I'm observing from behind my
>glasses and I like what I see, I'll make sure you
>know; hiding is not my intention.  Give me a sign,
>and I'll gladly take them off so you can tell.

I'll let you know.

-lile



-- 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lile Elam	    |  "Remember... No matter where you go, there you are."
lile@netcom.com     |		
Un*x Admin / Artist |			 Buckaroo Banzai
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble)
Subject: PHOBE ALERT: Erasure vs. Walt Disney
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 92 16:58:57 GMT
Organization: WeasElectro Productions: Television/Movies/Comics

My friend Christian over in Sweden passed this along this morning:

> The Swedish children's programme The Disney Club (cartoons&music for
> kids aged around 8-14) had recorded a special feature on Erasure which
> they intended to show last week.  But when the American Disney who are
> supervising the programme got to know about this, they said "Isn't that
> Andy Bell person gay?  Yes, he is!  Cancel the show!!".  This caused an
> enormous outrage in Sweden, where such open homophobia is clearly taboo.
> Other artists who are supposed to be on the show have withdrawn.  Vince
> Clarke said they are going to sue Disney.   Andy Bell's comment was
> "They behave like Nazis".  Some video rental chains have said they're
> going to take all Disney movies off the shelves.  The papers have been
> filled with angry letters from readers.  A huge PR loss for Disney, to
> say the least. 
>
> I don't think there are fewer homophobics over here than in America,
> it's just that you can't slag gay people off in public like that.   

--
Lazlo (lazlo@triton.unm.edu)
Newsgroups: soc.motss