From: 3040_3744@uwovax.uwo.ca
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re:reply to Constitutional Amendment
Date: 8 Apr 92 18:35:37 EST

In article <1992Apr8.071023.5172@usage.csd.unsw.OZ.AU>, shahid@vast.unsw.edu.au (Shahid Masud (Supr. Rigby)) writes:
> Dear Readers,
> Assalamoalaikum,
> Given below are the constitutional changes which were brought about in
> Pakistan constitution to solve the Qadiyani problem once and for all.
> The matter was not discussed  by people like us using usenet but rather
> by  eminent  scholars both from sides of Muslims and Qadiyanis. I hope
> this material will be a good reference for all readers.
> Jazak'Allah,
> Wassalam,
> Shahid Masud
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  QADIYANIS AND AHMADIS DECLARED NON-MUSLIMS BY THE PAKISTAN PARLIAMENT
>  =====================================================================
> 
> On the historic day of 7 September, 1974, the National Assembly of
> Pakistan, amending  two provisions in the Constitution excluded from
> the fold  of Islam all those << who do not believe in the absolute and
> unqualified Finality of the Prophethood of Mohammad. >> These
> amendments were also endorsed by the Senate which met soon after  the
> Assembly Session.
> 
> The passage  of this historic constitutional amendment bill by the  two
> houses of Parliament climaxed the  three-month-long << in camera >>
> deliberations of the National Assembly as a special committee, during
> which the Chiefs of the Rabwah and Lahore Jama'ats were examined for
> << forty one hours and fifty minutes >>  and << eight hours and twenty
> minutes >> respectively,involving << twenty eight>> sittings lasting over
> << ninety six hours >>.
> 
> One of  the two amendments inserts a new clause in Article 260 of the
> Constitution of Pakistan defining a non-Muslim saying:
> "Any person who does not believe in the  absolute and unqualified
> Finality of the Prophethood of Muhammad (peace be upon him), or
> recognizes such a claimant as a prophet or a religious reformer, is not
> a Muslim for the purposes of the Constitution or Law".
> 
> The second  amendment relates to Article 106 of the Constitution
> providing for the reservation of seats in provincial legislatures  for
> minorities. In Clause III of this Article after reference to  other
> minority communities like Christians,  Hindus, Sikhs, etc., the words
> << "and persons of the Qadiyani group or the Lahori group (who also
> call themselves `Ahmadis')" >> have been inserted.
> 
> Apart from the constitutional changes, the unanimously adopted
> resolution of the Assembly  recommended that consequential and
> procedural amendments may be made in the relevant laws,  such as the
> National Registration Act,  1973, and the Electoral Rolls Rules, 1974.
> It, however, recommended one specific modification  that Section (295A)
> of the Pakistan Penal Code will have the addition of the following
> explanation:
> "A Muslim who professes, practices or propagates against the concept of
> the Finality of the Prophethood of Mohammad (peace be upon him) as set
> out in Clause III of Article 260 of the Constitution shall be punishable
> under the Constitution".
> 


THANKS THAT YOU BROUGHT THIS ISSUE ON THE NET WORK. NOW LISTEN MAN AND YOU WILL
SEE WHAT HAS BEEN DONE WITH THIS AMMENDMENT TO PAKISTAN

1. THE PROMISED MASSIAH (A.S) WAS TOLD BY ALLAH THAT " WHOEVER WILL HELP YOU
ALLAH WILL HELP HIM AND WHOEVER WILL TRY TO DISGRACE YOU ALLAH WILL DISGRACE
HIM" NOW LETS LOOK AT THIS PARTICULAR INCIDENT AND ANALYZE IT

A: FIRST OF ALL DESPITE SEVERAL REQUISTS FROM AHMADIYYA SIDE THE ASSEMBLY
REPORT WAS NEVER  RELEASED FOR PUBLICATIONS. RATHER AT ONE OCCASSION THAN PRIME
MINISTER OF PAKISTAN (PROBABLY IN EARLY 1977) WHEN THERE WAS LOT OF OPPOSITION
AGAINST HIM FROM MULLA'S THREATENED THAT HE WILL RELEASE THE REPORT IF MULLA'S
DON'T STOP MAKING NOISE AGAINST HIM. HE FURTHER MENTIONED THAT IF HE WILL
RELEASE THAT REPORT HALF OF PAKISTAN WILL BE CONVERTED TO AHMADIAT. 
I CAN STILL CHALLENGE YOU TO ASK YOUR GOVERNMENT TO RELEASE FULL PARLIMENTRY
REPORT TO THE MEDIA AND THAN SEE WHAT ARE THE FACTS WHICH HAVE NEVER BEEN TOLD
TO YOU.

B: AS I MENTIONED ABOVE THE PROMISE OF ALLAH TO HAZRAT MIRZA GHULAM AHMED SAHIB
OF QADIAN THAT WHOEVER WILL TRY TO HUMILATE HIM ALLAH WILL HUMILATE HIM. SO
LOOK WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT ASSEMBLY AFTER DECLEARING AHMADIES ARE NON MUSLIM.
WITHIN THREE YEARS GOVERNMENT WAS THROUGHN OUT (RATHER KICKED OUT) AND THE HEAD
OF THAT GOVERNMENT WAS HANGED TO DEATH WITH MUCH HUMILIATION. I HOPE YOU
REMEMBER LAST FEW DAYS OF MR. BHUTTO IN JAIL AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF HIS FINAL
DEATH. AS FOR THE ASSEMBLY IS CONCERNED IF YOU READ NEWS PAPERS OF PAKISTAN
BETWEEN 1977-1985 YOU WILL EASILY KNOW WHAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN ABOUT THE MEMBERS
OF THAT CABNIT AND ABOUT THE MEMBERS OF PARLIMEN. LOT OF THEM WERE ALCOHOLIC
EVEN MR. BHUTTO IS KNWON TO DRINK ALCOHOL. THEY WERE BUNCH OF GREEDY AND LIARS.
IF YOU ARE REFERING A DECESSION MADE BY THAT KIND OF PEOPLE AN ISLAMIC THAN  I
CAN ONLY SAY "INNA LILLA HE WA INNA ALHE RAJUOON".

C: THE CONSTITUTION WAS DELCLEARED UNISLAMIC BY YOUR GENERAL ZIA-UL-HAQ IN 1977
AND WAS THEREFORE BANNED.

D: SOME OF THE STORIES WHICH WERE LEAKED ARE ALSO VERY INTERESTING FOR EXAMPLE
AT ONE POINT WHEN THE SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY ASKED VARIOUS SO CALLED RELGIOUS
LEADERS IN THE PARLIMENT TO GIVE THE DEFINATION OF "MUSLIM" EVERY ONE GAVE A
DIFFERENT DEFINATION AND NON OF THEM AGREED ON A SAME DEFINATION. SO THOSE WERE
THE SO CALLED CHAMPION OF ISLAM WHO DOES'T KNOW THE BASIC DEFINATION OF
"MUSLIM" EVEN. THE HUMILITY WHICH THEY SUFFERED AFTERWARD EVERY ONE IS AWARE OF
IT. ON TOP OF IT PAKISTAN'S INTERNATL SITUATION IS CONTINEOULY DECLINING SICNE
THEN. THIS IS A CLEAR CUT FACT THAT NO STABLE GOVERNMENT HAD RULED PAKISTAN
SINCE THAN AND PEACE IN THAT COUNTRY IS NOW A THING OF THE PAST. 
IF IT WAS AN ACT OF GOOD THAN WHY ALLAH IS SO ANGRY WITH PAKISTAN THAT IT IS
CONTINEOUSLY GOING DOWNWARD? WE SHOULD THINK ABOUT THAT AND LOOK AT WHAT WE
HAVE DONE WRONG BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. 

OVER THE LAST SEVRAL YEARS IT HAS BEEN CRYSTAL CLEAR THAT ALLAH IS ANGRY WITH
THE PEOPLE OF PAKISTAN AND IS CONTINEOUSLY PUNISHING THEM WITH ONE THING AFTER
THE OTHER. IF IT WAS A GOOD ACT THAN ALLAH SHOULD HAD BEEN HAPPY RAHTER THAN
ANGRY AND SHOULD HAVE REWARDED THAT GOVERNMENT AND ASSEMBLY WHICH DID THAT GOOD
JOB RATHER THAN PUNISHING THEM. 

PLEASE OPEN YOUR EYES AND THINK ABOUT THAT WITH COOL MINDEDNESS  AND DO NOT
CONTINUE THOSE ACTS WHICH MAKE ALLAH ANGRY AND REPENT FROM THOSE WRONG ACTS.

MAY ALLAH GUIDE YOU TO THE RIGHT PATH (AMEEN).
M. HAMEED A. MUNAWAR
>