HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: boisseau@chpc.utexas.edu (John R. Boisseau (Jay))
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Freiberger for Heisman--NOT! (was Re: SMU crushes Houston)
Keywords: SMU, Mustangs, Crush, Pummel, Destroy, Revenge
Date: 11 Nov 92 19:29:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: chpc.1992Nov11.192933.25627
Distribution: rec
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC

In article <1263@fozzy.UUCP> ckoontz@fozzy.UUCP (Carl H. Koontz) writes:
>Revenge sure is sweet.
>
>SMU really looked good Saturday.  I don't care if Houston is having a bad
>year or whatever, but SMU gave them a good old-fashioned whipping.  41-16
>is a good victory no matter who you are playing.
>
>In a couple years, it looks like SMU will be a force to be reckoned with
>as more depth is added in the lines.
>
>Dan Freiberger seriously might be picking up some Heisman votes with his
>performance this season.


Oh, NO! Not this 'Freiberger for Heisman' crap again. Yes, Dandy Dan had
a good game Saturday, and I'm glad. I went to the game 3 years ago when
UH humiliated SMU (and themselves, in a way) 95-21 (well, I only stayed
for the first 88 points). But Dan Freiberger is NOT going to win the
Hesiman. SMU is NOT going to go to the Cotton Bowl in the next three years.
It will take more than three years for Rossley to get the kind of recruiting
he needs to get SMU to that level, and that is what it will take for a
QB to have the kind of supporting cast necessary to get Heisman consider-
ation.

Of course, if SMU whips my 'Horns this weekend, I retract everything I have
said here. ;-)

Jay



-- 

*********************************
  John R. Boisseau ("Jay")       
  Department of Astronomy        
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mbs@zycor.lgc.com (Matt Shostak)
Subject: Re: Reggie Brooks for Heisman
Organization: Landmark/Zycor   Austin, Texas
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 17:37:55 GMT

In article <1992Nov8.163244.16264@wl.com> wyborsr@wl.com (Russ Wyborski) writes:
>	People can say all that they want about Marshall Faulk, Garrison Hearst, Gino Torreta, and the rest, but IMHO Reggie Brooks deserves some serious
>consideration for the Heisman. The guy is averaging around 8.5 yards/carry and
>is one one the hardest, and most exciting players I have seen. In Holtz's 
>system no one running back is goign to get more than about 15 carries a game
>which makes Brooks 1000+ yards in 9 games very remarkable. He is the first 
>1000 yard rusher in the Holtz era. It's just too bad that many times the 
>Heisman candidates are decided before the season starts because he definitely
>derserves a look.
>
>-- 

We can't have yet another winner from Notre Dame; are you kidding?  Then
we'd have to hear all that crap about how the media is biased toward ND.
And of course they're right.  The media is never biased toward anyone
else, like Miami or Texas A&M.  (Though they are sometimes biased toward
East Coast teams, not just ND.)  I mean, they only pick a Heisman winner
from Miami when he truly deserves it, like Vinny Testaverde.  And just look
at the brutal schedules they have to go through! (Especially A&M this year).
They even have to win their MNCs in front of those ugly Orange Bowl fans.
It's just one humungous hurdle after another for those guys.

Besides, Brooks doesn't "find a way to win" like Torretta does.  So what if
he shredded the 4th scoring defense in the country yesterday.  So what if
5 or 6 Michigan defenders couldn't tackle him.  Also, Brooks would never
get those yards without his tremendous supporting cast, while Torretta
has such a weak team around him he has to really struggle to find a way to
win each week.  (I suppose Hearst and Faulk have awesome teams around them
also, so no one can key on them exclusively, furthering arguments for
Torretta).

Hey, when an analyst as unbiased, fair, and intelligent as Lee Corso says
Torretta should win it, you just have to trust his judgment.  

Besides, Brooks has to go up against Penn State and Southern Cal next, and
they should shut him down.  Maybe if he gains 300 yards against each of them,
voters will take a glance, but if he is held to 80 or less, forget it.
PSU could never hold the mighty Torretta to 80, could they?





-- 
Matthew B. Shostak              Landmark/Zycor
mbs@zycor.lgc.com               (512) 282-6699
"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the war room!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mbs@zycor.lgc.com (Matt Shostak)
Subject: Re: Mo Points Theory holds with A.P. pollsters!!
Organization: Landmark/Zycor   Austin, Texas
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 21:59:26 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.205132.1936@zip.eecs.umich.edu> rjones@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Randolph M. Jones) writes:
>In article <1992Nov4.201422.12953@u.washington.edu> baze@carson.u.washington.edu (Behzad Khamneian) writes:
>>
>>I read this article this morning and found it interesting.  So, I'm sharing it
>>with you all...
>>
>>From:  Seattle Post Intelligencer.
>>By:    Dan Raley, P-I Reporter.
>>Date:  11/4/1992
>>Title: MIAMI VOTERS SEEM UNLIKELY TO SWITCH.
>>All three remain Hurricane backers.
>>  Why?
>>  "It's an intangible thing," Blaudschun said.  "Miami just always finds a
>>way to win every game they play."
>
>As opposed to Washington, who just wins every game they play without "always
>finding a way"?  What the hell is this guy talking about?



Could it be that he means, teams that should have beaten them choked?

-- 
Matthew B. Shostak              Landmark/Zycor
mbs@zycor.lgc.com               (512) 282-6699
"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the war room!"
From: kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Sunday morning QB
Date: 10 Nov 92 00:18:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: sdcc12.40797
Distribution: na

In article <1dmji8INNao7@haydn.crhc.uiuc.edu>, ttsai@crhc.uiuc.edu (Timothy Tsai) writes:
> kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi) writes:
> >o After all that, SDSU still controls it's destiny to the Holiday Bowl.
> >  They have to beat Hawaii and Fresno St at home in the next 2 weeks.
> All BYU fans are rooting for SDSU to beat Hawaii next week.  Then there will be
> a four-way tie for the conference lead.
> -- 
> Timothy Tsai              Celtics Rule!!!
> ttsai@uiuc.edu            Let's go Mets!!!


Lets look at the WAC scenarios.

If Hawaii beats SDSU, Hawaii goes to the Holiday Bowl no matter what.

If SDSU beats Hawaii; SDSU, BYU, Hawaii, and Fresno St will have 2 losses each.
HeadToHead: SDSU > Hawaii > BYU
            Hawaii > BYU > Fresno St 

If SDSU beats Hawaii and Fresno St, SDSU goes to the HB.




_______________________________________________________
| Prashanth                    |                      |
| U. of California @ San Diego | prash@raman.ucsd.edu |
#######################################################
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: gsroka@leland.Stanford.EDU (Gregory Sroka)
Subject: Re: Reggie Brooks for Heisman
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 05:31:06 GMT

In article <lfqaeeINNh10@cronkite> andy@sunloop.Sun.COM (Andy Knipp SE Andersen) writes:
>In article <1992Nov8.163244.16264@wl.com> wyborsr@wl.com (Russ Wyborski) writes:
>>	People can say all that they want about Marshall Faulk, Garrison Hearst,
>>Gino Torreta, and the rest, but IMHO Reggie Brooks deserves some serious
>>consideration for the Heisman.
>
>Hmmmm,  first Mirer,  Bettis,  now Brooks.  Why don't we just give it to the
>ND MVP ?
>

Excellent idea!  While you're at it - how about reconsidering a couple
of recent Heisman's.  Tony Rice and the Rocket got robbed.

(And give an honorary one to Joe Theissman, after all his name didn't 
always rhyme with Heisman!)
From: hyde@cwis.unomaha.edu (Don Hyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami #1
Date: 12 Nov 92 18:19:31 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha

Myung Joon Choi <mc83+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

>I can't believe all of this anti-Miami sentiment going around the polls.
> What does Miami have to do to prove their worth as #1?  They beat
>EVERYONE who is put in front of them (when's the last time Miami lost to
>a #1 ranked team, Ithink they have a streak of 11 or 12 wins against #1
>ranked teams they've played).  
>    Take for example last year, going into the Florida St.-Miami game,
>Florida State was the overwhelming favorite as #1, Miami was #2, and
>Washington #3.  Miami beat Florida St. AT Florida St.  They also beat
>Penn State and pummelled Nebraska in the Orange (they ended up having
>beaten six bowl teams).  Who did Washington beat to deserve their lofty
>ranking.  Gee, let's see. They beat an overrated Michigan team who
>Florida St. crushed at Ann Arbor and they beat up on some other
>opponents and even pulled out a dominating 14-7 victory vs. Cal. 
>National Championship material, pleeeease.
>    And this year, Washington overtook Miami when Miami barely beat
>Arizona, and only regained it when they beat Florida St. and Penn State
>in consecutive weeks.  Washington (bandwagon) fans jumped all over the
>'Canes for that one, only to see their beloved Huskers get completely
                                                ^^^^^^^
                                                
That SHOULD be.....should BE HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
>shut down last weekend.  If things go as planned, Miami will have beaten
>Arizona, Penn State, Florida St., Syracuse, San Diego St., and
>Alabama/Texas A&M.  All this without their version of Steve Emtman in
>Rusty Medeiras.  
> 
>    All I can say is, you may not like 'em, but you gotta admit they're
>the best college football team in the country and have been for the last
>decade.  
>    And for all those whiners who complain about the close field goals,
>stop looking for the weakest of arguments and suck it up.         
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner)
Subject: YES!!! YES!!! YES!!! 
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 03:42:44 GMT

SMU 41 Houston 16

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFF!!!!!!!!

GT
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: aelman@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Adam Elman)
Subject: Re: STANFORD/ARIZONA TRASH
Organization: CS Department, Stanford University, California, USA
Date: 12 Nov 92 21:53:53 GMT

rjones@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Randolph M. Jones) writes:

>In article <14020@cis.rand.org> bentow@cis.rand.org (Stan Bentow) writes:
>>In article <aelman.721358597@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> aelman@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Adam Elman) writes:
>>>
>>>Again, the only reason that the U$C Band plays with all these artists,
>>>TV, movies, etc. is because _you're_in_LA_!!!!!  
>>
>>UCLA's also in LA.

>Imagine that...and guess what?  UCLA *also* has played with various artists and
>in movies, etc.  I think Adam's point is very well taken.

Oh -- I wasn't aware of that.  Allow me to retract the compliment I
gave the USC Band in the previous post -- they're not _that_ much
better than the UCLA Band.

They're just more obnoxious about gloating about all the artists and
movies they've been involved with. :-)

Adam Elman
aelman@cs.stanford.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: wilbanks@spot.Colorado.EDU (Wendell Gee)
Subject: Big 8 woof
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 17:44:48 GMT

I just had to say this....
Congratulations to Nebraska for their Big 8 championship.
Too bad that while CU and USC mix it up in the Fiesta Bowl, Kansas and
Hawaii play a possibly good game in the Aloha Bowl, and OU...um, Weedeater
Bowl? you poor Huskers will be splattered across the Orange Bowl turf by
Florida State.
"What happened? We clobbered Kansas. We humiliated Colorado. Why did we 
get our butts kicked in the Orange Bowl????" 
Well, 1) Colorado was overranked and 2) Kansas wins the Big 8 title NEXT 
year and 3) To even think that a Big 8 team can play on the same turf as 
Florida State right now is ridiculous. 


-- 
Dylan Wilbanks, Classics major, AND NOW Environmental Conservation!
Hobbes:"Why do we always play war and not peace?"|Currently at:
Calvin:"Too few role models."                    |Box 1143
Ren-n-Stimpy in '92! Vote for a real cartoon!    |Boulder, CO 80306
From: azzarito@cse.fau.edu (Doug Azzarito)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: WEEKLY TOP 25
Date: 2 Nov 92 06:54:39 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA


      -----=====< The A.P. Top 25 >=====-----

THIS LAST
WEEK WEEK  SCHOOL      W L T  Last Week's Results          Next Game
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 1    2  Washington    8 0 0  WON v. Stanford,41-7         at Arizona,11/7
 2    1  Miami         8 0 0  WON v. WVirginia,35-23       v. Temple, 11/14
 3    4  Alabama       8 0 0  --IDLE--                     at LSU, 11/7
 4    3  Michigan      7 0 1  WON at Purdue,24-17          at NWestern,11/7
 5    5  Texas A&M     8 0 0  WON at SMU,41-7              v. Louisville,11/7
 6    6  Florida St    7 1 0  WON at Virginia,13-3         v. Maryland,11/7
 7    8  Nebraska      6 1 0  WON v. Colorado,52-7         v. OklahomaSt.,11/7
 8   10  Notre Dame    6 1 1  WON v. Navy, 38-7            v. BostonColl,11/7
 9   11  Boston Coll   7 0 1  WON v. Temple,45-6           at Notre Dame,11/7
10   12  Syracuse      7 1 0  WON v. Pitt,41-10            v. Va.Tech,11/7
11   13  Southern Cal  5 1 1  WON at ArizonaSt,23-13       at Stanford,11/7
12   17  Arizona       5 2 1  WON v. N.MexicoSt, 30-0      v. Washington,11/7
13   18  Kansas        7 1 0  WON v. OklahomaSt, 26-18     at Nebraska,11/7
14   20  Florida       5 2 0  WON v. Georgia, 26-24        v. So.Miss,11/7
15    7  Georgia       7 2 0  LOST v. Florida 26-24        at Auburn,11/14
16    8  Colorado      6 1 1  LOST at Nebraska,52-7        v. Kansas, 11/7
17   21  NC State      6 2 1  --IDLE--                     at Virginia, 11/7
18   22  N.Carolina    7 2 0  WON at Maryland, 31-24       at Clemson,11/7
19   24  Miss. State   6 2 0  WON at Kentucky,37-36        v. Arkansas,11/7
20   25  Texas         5 2 0  WON at TexasTech, 44-33      at TCU,11/7
21   15  Stanford      6 3 0  LOST at Washington, 41-7     v. SouthernCal,11/7
22   --  Ohio State    6 2 0  WON at Iowa, 38-15           v. Minnesota,11/7
23   14  Penn State    6 3 0  LOST v. BYU, 30-17           at Notre Dame,11/14
24   16  Tennessee     5 3 0  LOST at SCarolina,24-23      at MemphisSt,11/14
25   19  WashingtonSt  6 2 0  LOST v. Oregon, 34-17        v. ArizonaSt,11/7

   Last week's casualties...

LAST
WEEK  SCHOOL       W L T  Last Game                   Next Game
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 23  Virginia      6 3 0  LOST v. FloridaSt, 13-3      v. NC State,11/7
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: lauson@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Patrick W Lauson)
Subject: Re: What's the Bowl picture?
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 17:30:53 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.001706.3413@u.washington.edu> crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck) writes:

>>Fiesta Bowl:?
>
>	Really depends on the results of the SEC championship.  If
>	Alabama loses, they will end up here, matched up with Miami,
>	Notre Dame, Southern Cal, Texas A&M (if they lose to Texas),
>	Boston College, Arizona, and half a dozen other teams.
>
>>Citrus Bowl:? 
>
>	Two of the teams listed for the Fiesta Bowl as possiblities
>	will end up playing here.

It was my understanding that the #2 B10 and #2 SEC teams will play in this
bowl.  This would throw out the argument of an Alabama team with a loss
in the SEC championship game playing against Miami (unless the #2 B10 team
does not get 7 (?) wins).  This game will probably be Ohio State vs.
Georgia/Florida/Tennessee....

Pat
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: chyang@pun.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang)
Subject: Re: Trouble at the UDub
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 92 20:51:58 EST
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Originator: chyang@pun.engin.umich.edu


In article <1992Nov6.003422.21651@u.washington.edu>, baze@carson.u.washington.edu (Behzad Khamneian) writes:
> In article <1992Nov5.214700.7873@u.washington.edu> tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner) writes:
> >The Seattle Times is reporting that Husky QB Billy Joe Hobert received
> >a $50,000 loan from an Idaho businessman last spring.  Don James and    
> >athletic director Barbara Hedges apparently were informed of the loan 
> >only yesterday by the Times reporters.  The NCAA says they will not 
> >pursue this until receiving a report from the UW.  An NCAA spokesman says
> >the legality of the loan depends on the relationship to the player (BJ 
> >says he was his golfing buddy and the man apparently has no affiliation
> >to the university) and the "normality" of the payoff (there are no 
> >specified payoff in BJ's loan).  National-letter-of-intent contracts say
> >that no outside loans may be accepted.
> 
>   This case, so far, doesn't seem to be any worse than the DuBose case. 
> However, UW doesn't have the payoff, err.. the luck of the Irish!!  So, 
> Billy Joe may not get the same treatment that Dubose did.  In any case,
> what Hobert did was *very* stupid, blowing the money on a 1992 Camaro, guns,
> golf clubs, partying, and a stereo.  His wife is pregnant and here this guy
> gets oodles of money that almost all college students would die for and just
> throws it away.  Plus, he is a student athlete and is not supposed to take
> these kinds of loands according to the NCAA!!
>   Personally, I have no problems with a player taking money from someone else,
> unless the money is used to sway the player to choose a particular college 
> when the kid is high school.  But, the NCAA doesn't take sh*t!!
> 
>   Billy Joe has been sort of a trouble-maker since his arrival at the UW.
> First, he was not "comfortable" two years ago playing behind Brunell.
> Then, he flapped his gums all season last year (putting down the performance
> of the offense after the Cal game and then saying that the UW should throw
> the Rose Bowl to play Miami).  And this year, he has not performed up to 
> expectation and now this loan crap!!
> 
> The Jim McMahon of college football ladies and gentlemen.
> 

	That is really a shame.  I wonder what Don James will do about it.
But I don't think he will get in trouble because, the man who gave him the
money is not affiliated with UW in anyway.  The people who gave Duboise 
money were Notre Dame Alums.  (Correct me if I am wrong.)  

	Thank god we still have Brunell and Huard.

- Chung Yang
> >GT
> 
> -Behzad
> p.s. Good timing by the press!!  Right before the biggest game of the season
> and a week, when we are ranked #1.  Last year, the press did some story bout
> low graduation rates after we had just finished the season 11-0.
> 
>
From: maryb@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Jayhawk Post #39 (KU-CU to be on TV)
Date: 5 Nov 92 00:29:22 CST
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

This article is from the Wednesday, November 4, 1992 issue of the University
Daily Kansan.

JAYHAWKS BOOST NATIONAL FOOTBALL IMAGE WITH RECORD-BREAKING TV APPEARANCES
by Christoph Fuhrmans, Special to the Kansan

   Colorado will challenge a Big Eight championship contender in a regionally
televised game on ABC-TV on Nov. 14. Most people would think that the
Buffaloes' opponent would be a traditional powerhouse like Nebraska or
Oklahoma. But this year, it's Kansas.
   Because of Kansas' success, the Jayhawks will play their record fourth game
on national television this season. The other three games were the Oct. 10
Kansas State game on the Prime Sports Network, the Sept. 24 game against
California on ESPN and this Saturday's game against Nebraska, also on ESPN.
The most nationally televised games for Kansas was in 1982 when it played in
front of the camera three times.
   Kansas and Colorado athletic department officials say they are excited
about another chance to play on national television. "It means more money for
the conference," said Dave Plati, assistant athletic director for Colorado.
"It's a breath of fresh air for the conference to have another team emerge and
challenge the big three."
   Doug Vance, Kansas assistant athletic director, said, "We're excited about
the game. It means a lot to our program." Vance also said the televised games
would benefit recruiting and enhance the team's image.
   The televised Kansas-Colorado game also will be a record for the Big Eight
Conference. It will be the 17th Big Eight game on national television, giving
the conference 24 exposures. The record had been 13 games with 16 exposures.
An exposure counts for each Big Eight team that plays in a televised game.
   The increased national coverage of the football team has affected some of
the players' outlooks. "We like the chance to appear on television," senior
wide receiver Matt Gay said. "Now that we have the chance, we need to look
good."
   Kansas approaches this weekend's game against Nebraska with a 7-1 overall
record and 4-0 in the Big Eight.

Posted to r.s.b.c. by Kansas Mary
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Re: Apple Cup (was Re: Washington vs. Arizona)
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 92 14:18:08 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: VMARK Software, Inc.

In article <X2A=70#@engin.umich.edu> chyang@australorp.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang) writes:
>
>	It it not arrogance.  Its percentages.  Do you seriously think
>that the team with the talent of the Huskies would play as poorly as they
>did against Arizona two weeks in a role?  

Chung, let's give the Arizona team some credit.  They seriously "Dawged" your
team, and they deserved the win.  It was to Washington's credit that they
were able to prevent a couple of other scores as well (most notably the fumble
deep in UW territory.)

-- 
David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: chuckd@cpqhou.compaq.com (Chuck Dickson)
Subject: Re: MS State, Florida, Bama
Organization: Compaq Computer Corporation
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 19:54:03 GMT

in article <cls4.721322494@Isis.MsState.Edu>, cls4@ra.msstate.edu (Charles L. Spirrison) says:
> 
> 
> 
> A. On October 1, the Mississippi State Bulldogs POUNDED the Florida Gators.
>    ... it wasn't even close.  Shane was simply rattled by the defense.
> B. Mississippi State is currently 7-2.  The Gators are 6-2.
> C. Florida is ranked 13 by USA Today/CNN, 11 in the AP.
> D. Mississippi State is ranked 16 in each poll.
> 
>   .... something is wrong here
> 

This happens all the time.  The polls are ranking the teams by how they are
perceived to be playing at that week.  It is probably that the Gators 
are thought to be playing better football now than the Bulldogs.

Remember, since the pounding, Florida has beaten then #7 Georgia as well
as every other opponent they have played, while MSU has lost a game and
beaten noone of note.

If they beat Bama, then they deserve to jump into the top 10.


-- 
**************************************************************************
Chuck Dickson - Compaq Computer Corporation - chuckd@cpqhou.uucp
SHHHH...I'm hunting wabbit...eheheheheheheh
The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of my employer.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jjungbau@meriadoc.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer)
Subject: Top 25 Poll
Organization: Washington State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 92 22:39:16 GMT


Can someone post the CNN/USA Today Top 25 poll?

Thanks.

Jim