HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (dreas)
Subject: Re: rON bashing
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 04:18:50 GMT

In article Ltp@panix.com, jis@panix.com (Jack Szwergold) writes:

>Well, how abou this then.....
>
>"I think it idiotic to have to go to work and utilize modern technologies
>to spread YOUR words worldwide, but refuse to eat a ham-and-cheese
>sandwich because you might get condemned to whatever for it."
>
>The fact that YOUR is used as well as the statement "refuse to eat..."
>blah blah blah, are statements againsta a person.  Does an idea eat a ham
>and cheese sandwich?  Gimme a break....  If the statement were worded
>differently (maybe "I think it idiotic that one can spread ideas
>instantaneously using modern technolgies yet practices such as refusing to
>eat ham-and-cheese sandwiches still exist"....) it would be attacking the
>idea only, NOT the person....
>
>Excuse this nitpicking grammar lesson, but "rON" assinine statement is/was
>a personal attack against personal beliefs, not a philosphical attack upon
>an idea.....
>
>And one doesn't have to Jewish to know that........
>
>What if someone came on the net and attack other religions in the same
>way?  Gimme a break.....
>
>I am sick and tired of the B.S. being thrown that claims that somehow ONLY
>Jews are the only ones who marry or socialize within "their" group. 
>Please, show me one group that DOESN'T.  Any attempt to introduce outside
>elements into ANY group (wether that be gang, tribe, nation, race or religion)
>is always met with opposition.........
>
>So can we quit this "WhydoJewsonlywanttomarryJews" B.S......
>
>Please?


Jacko, Shelley, et al:

Why not take this kvetchfest into email already?

If y'all have understood my last post on YeOldeTiredSubjekt,
then you understand that I hain't no anti-semite.

Can we all just coexist in peace?
I sympathise with your respective plights, but why must
people get so inflamed about such silly (IMNSHO) topics
as politics, religion, etc...

Who you date & marry is ultimately your individual choice.
It would appear that Ms. Shelley has no patience. Relationships
take time to develop. I have been on a trip, and all the email
romances that I have had the pleasure to meet IN PERSON did not 
light my fire immediately. 
 
The hottest firecracker was a dud. The sweetest girl remained the
sweetest girl, and the most unassuming was a potential atom bomb
(although not detonated). Patience is the watchword. You want love @
first sight[TM]? 

GOOD LUCK, is all that I can add.

dreas






Xref: sparky soc.singles:35491 alt.romance:15737
From: weaver@jetsun.weitek.COM (Michael Gordon Weaver)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance
Subject: Re: Meeting guys
Date: 6 Jan 93 18:23:40 GMT
Organization: WEITEK Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <C0ELDC.21p@mach1.wlu.ca> macl6441@mach1.wlu.ca (macleod heather) writes:
>I've been reading a lot lately here about how men should go about meeting
>women, but nobody seems to be giving many suggestions on how women can meet
>men.  I ended a four year relationship a month ago, and I'm ready to meet
>someone new, but I'm not really comfortable with the bar scene.  There are
>guys in some of my classes, but I'm pretty shy.  Can someone give me some
>advice?
>
I have found that there are a lot of people who don't like the bar
scene, men and women.  Sandra's reply (hobby clubs, fun classes,
volunteer work) was very good.  A good book on the subject is Sharon
Wolfe's "50 ways to meet your lover".  

I don't think there is much of a difference between men and women on
meeting people of the opposite sex.  And unless you are looking for a
one night stand, I don't think there is much difference in how you go
about looking for a SO and how you look for a new friend. Of course,
you want to look for situations with the right proportion of men. With
too many men, the men will be competing to talk to you and you won't
get much of a chance to get to know any one man.  Too few men, and you
won't get enough attention.

Most people think they are shy, but if you are particularly shy, you
may be passing up opportunities to meet people. If you are in school,
you have lots of opportunities to meet people, if you are willing to
stick your neck out and risk a little rejection. You might want to make
a goal to become less shy.

You can't become less shy overnight, but you can get a little better
every day. The way to do this is to constantly push yourself to be just
a little more outgoing than you feel like. Don't try to make a big
quitting.

Try to socialize with everyone you meet. Try to get them to talk about
themselves. People are pretty interesting if you give them a chance,
and they love to talk about themselves. If you socialize with all sorts
of people, you will get lots of practice on people you aren't worried
about impressing. It is easier to learn when you aren't under
pressure.  And when you meet someone you do want to impress, you will
be more confident about your abilities because of all that practice.

Good Luck,
Michael.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: finding it when ya ain't lookin'
Organization: AT&T
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 14:50:19 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.175638.2576@merrimack.edu> nin15b63@merrimack.edu (The Wolf) writes:
>In article <1993Jan6.202451.16366@cbnewsd.cb.att.com>, nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>> 
>> Ever meet someone who has an obvious problem exiting a conversation?
>> Or who wants to talk about the fact that you're having a conversation?
>
>You've hit up on something upon which others have also been hitting in the
>threads on meeting people: It can be easier to do something when your focus
>isn't immersed on whether/how well you are doing it.  In your example, a person
>is so intent on the *idea* having a conversation, that s/he loses focus on any
>actual conversation.
>
>In the thread on meeting people, posters have been emphasizing things like
>getting involved in activities which are interesting anyway, or using the
>immediate situation and just "going with it".  What people seem to be saying is
>that when one is not caught up in meeting someone, that's when s/he meets
>someone.  It might seem like a paradox, but try it; it has been my experience.  

Oh, Bingo.  Said much better than I did.  
-- 
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Nance Colucci                                      att!ihlpl!colucci
"I'm a writer.  Be nice, or you'll wake up one day and be a story."
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 23:36:28 GMT

In article <lkop1eINNoko@news.bbn.com> dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>In article <1993Jan6.220416.17663@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>> 
>> If K-Mart telescopes and weights are fine for you, that's great and isn't
>> any sort of bad reflection on you--but they're still not examples of
>> "high-end" equipment.
>
>Personally, I don't think most people with an interest in astrology make
                                                           ^^^^^^^^^
>serious attempts to discover new comets 

No argument there.... 

>    or that most people with an interest 
>in weightlifting want to get into your league (but then, you started out 
>bigger than most people.)  Maybe you're stressing the word "serious" and 
>I'm stressing the word "most."  

I think so--when I think of someone "seriously" interested in something,
I tend to think of someone who devotes a fair amount of time and money to
the pursuit, certainly considerably more than the general population.

Trygve   (But at least both astronomers and bodybuilders are interested in
          heavenly bodies.)
--
                          The home handyman
 
"Home-Building with Nerf" by Carimel Splanchnic
"The How-To Guide to Turning Old Satellite Dishes into Attractive Lawn
 Furniture" by Jeffrey Pinwurm
"Double Your Floorspace by Knocking Down Your Walls" by Bob Klemming
"Decorating with Habitrails" by Klammie Spelunken
"Energy-Efficient Gazebos" by Simon Grunger
"Insulate Your Home with Hairballs" by Thomas Ferchucker
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: an4928@anon.penet.fi
Subject: Seeking female companion
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: soc.singles
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 22:50:23 GMT


  Hello !

         I would like to meet single female around Boston Area in the age
    group of 25-30. 


        Myself , a s/w engineer 28. 

    Please respond, if interested in more info....

   With best wishes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: b645zau@utarlg.uta.edu (The Brothers Grimm (Wayne and Ez-E))
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex
Subject: Re: The Classiest Pickup Lines
Summary: is too short often
Keywords: go get bent..
Date: 6 Jan 93 19:51:00 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Arlington
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1993Jan6.153113.10337@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, sorlin@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven J Orlin) writes...
>In article <1idntbINNfi@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>>"Come hither, oh beloved, and with me fulfill the most romantic impulses
>>that be thine."
> 
> 
>Uhh....umm...hey baby...can I take off my clothes and jump on you?????
>-- 
>"Nobody tells a Navy man when he's had enough to drink, cause only a Navy man
> knows when he's had enough to drink!"
>-Steven J Orlin   sorlin@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu  /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

How about this classic, "Would you like to dance?" and if/when the person
says no reply "No, I said you look FAT IN THOSE PANTS!"...

okay.. lame.. but hey..
(8

   /-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/
  /-/  Eric Culpepper         /-/-/-/ "What have I done with my life?"    /-/
 /-/  b645zau@utarlg.uta.edu /-/-/-/      -The Inspiral Carpets          /-/
/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (dreas)
Subject: Re: FLIRTING AS AN OLYMPIC DEMONSTRATION SPORT
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 93 01:40:36 GMT

In article 140336HOLTONS@QUCDN.QueensU.CA, Psycho!! <HOLTONS@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> () writes:
>Flirting is a lost art... requiring much skill and prowess.
>
>I propose we make it an Olympic demonstration sport...
>
>Imagine the results?  Team Canada v.s. Team Switzerland...  I'm getting sweaty
>just at the thought of it...  Where do I sign up?
>
>All in favour?


Aye!

dreas
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Date: 12 Jan 93 22:02:56
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
	<1993Jan7.225814.20952@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
	<ewright.726520511@convex.convex.com>
	<1993Jan8.222334.20157@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
	<ewright.726726993@convex.convex.com>
	<JULIE.93Jan11191949@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu>
	<MARTINC.93Jan12091806@grover.cs.unc.edu>
	<JULIE.93Jan12181932@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grover.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: julie@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu's message of Tue, 12 Jan 1993 23:19:32 GMT

In article <JULIE.93Jan12181932@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu> julie@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu (Julie Wright) writes:

   martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

   >julie@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu (Julie Wright) writes:

   >>.... Your case would be a lot more convincing if you seemed to have
   >>other things to say about other aspects of life, as both Charlie and
   >>Trygve do.  They don't exactly strike me as lugs with nothing to talk
   >>about except how much they can bench press.

   >Thank you.

   You forgot to give me a score!

I am a sensitive Alan Alda sort of guy and know that there are other,
more important, factors than whether I can score.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: hughes@venus.cc.hollandc.pe.ca (GREG HUGHES)
Subject: pickup lines
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Holland College - Charlottetown PEI
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 21:32:00 GMT

These are just quoted pickup lines that keep popping into my
head:

You go to the class room of a girl you are nuts about and ask
"  Excuse but I was wondering if you could help me! I want the
name of a pretty lady and possible her phone nummber in your class.
Pause and let her respond! If she offers to help , tell her
" well... what are you waiting for!?"

You go up to a girl in a bar in ask her " Is right to sue for the 
right to date you ......because it was you who knocked me off my feet!"

You ask a lady " Are you my gaurdian angel?... Because I Hope to God 
you are!!!! You are too beautiful not to be an angel!"

You ask" Are you certain that we didn't see each other as lovers in 
our past lifes or is it I am having a hopeful vision of the future?"

Just point out to her to come to you and say " you are the first woman 
to every paralyze a man with your beautiful presence" additional comment
for those that think she take it say " well almost paralyzedfrom the 
waist down!"

				The decent Greg

Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance
From: rohwerwd@netcom.com (W. David Rohwer)
Subject: Re: Where did you meet your SO? 
Organization: The Tickle Palace - Moonyvale, CA
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 03:17:49 GMT

In article <1993Jan6.064348.26971@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> bss2p@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Brent S. Stone) writes:
>As long as Heather got the ball rolling on the 
>subject of meeting people, where you meet your
>current partner?  Theorizing where to meet
>people is one thing, what works is another.  
>So how about some info for the group?
>

     I am SO-less now, but I will answer your question for most, if not
all, of my previous SOs and/or lovers.


     Month/Year  Month/Year     Place met
     Met         Considered
                 SO / lover

 1)  May 92      May 92     -   At a picnic sponsored by the San Jose
                                Unitarian Church's Young Adult Network
                                group.  (San Jose, CA)

 2)  87 or 88    Oct 91     -   She was a teller at a S&L that I had an
                                account.  (Sacramento, CA)

 3)  May 90      May 90     -   My apartment complex's weight room.
                                (Sunnyvale, CA)

 4)  Jan 89      Aug 89     -   A company that I worked at as a Co-op
                                employee through my university.  She
                                worked as a full-time permanent employee
                                at the same company.  She is the
                                Fundamentalist Christian that strongly
                                influenced my decision, against her wishes,
                                to reject Christianity.  (Sacramento, CA)

 5)  Jul 88      Jul 88     -   She answered my personal ad.
                                (Sacramento, CA)

 6)  Sep 87      Oct 87     -   She answered my personal ad.
                                (Sacramento, CA)

 7)  Summer 84   84 or 85   -   Outside of someone's party in my apartment
                                complex.  (Davis, CA)

 8)  Spring 84   Spring 84  -   Christian Intervarsity Fellowship Large
                                Group Friday Night Meeting.  (Davis, CA)

 9)  Summer 80   Summer 80  -   At a bench inside my townhouse's development.
                                (Alameda, CA)

10)  Summer 80   Summer 80  -   Through friends/neighbors in my townhouse's
                                development.  (Alameda, CA)

-- 
    Reggie elected into Hall of Fame!    +---------------------------------+
  +-----------------------------------+ /  Snowmobiling: Catch the fever! /
 /   // Mr. Tickle Monster   // Amiga ++---------------------------------+
|  \X/   W. David Rohwer   \X/  3000  /  Internet: rohwerwd@netcom.COM  /
+------------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: Canasta Question
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 14:28:02 GMT

In article <1993Jan11.163719.2040@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu> ljhr@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu writes:
>Does anybody out there play canasta?  I'm trying to learn and I have a few
>questions.  Nobody here plays.  Thanks in advance.

(Bolt upright in seat, waving arm furiously in the air, eyes bulging ...)

Me!!!  Me me me me me me meeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What's the question.  Red three's are cool.  I can open on the next round.
Do you know the difference between an black canasta and a red canasta?

Canasta, ahhhhhh.  Hurt me.
-- 
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Nance Colucci                                      att!ihlpl!colucci
"I'm a writer.  Be nice, or you'll wake up one day and be a story."
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
Subject: Re: rON bashing
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:59:48 GMT
Organization: Society for the Promulgation of Cruelty to the Clueless

In article <1993Jan11.225413.5286@cbnews.cb.att.com> eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (Piglet) writes:

>Sugar-free whipped cream?  Now that _is_ silly!
>
>Piglet, thoroughly chuffed at the thought of Piglets-in-a-blanket,
>        with extra whipped cream (_not_ sugar-free)

Now why would you want to add sugar to whipped cream?  Just get some
heavy (whipping) cream, put it in a blender, et voila!

Seth [who prefers the thought of Piglet-in-a-sheet with whipped cream;
blankets are too hard to wash]

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Hw strng shld a rspns b?
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 12:31:28 GMT

blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:

] In article <93010.233235H97SI@CUNYVM.BITNET> <H97SI@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:
] >hello  does this topic make sense?
] >are there any young jewish ladies (in the new york area)
] >looking for a young jewish male (i turned 28 yesterday)
] >want to know more  i'll be glad to answer all  :) mike
] 
] Yeah, this topic means YOU'RE POSTING A PERSONAL AD IN THE WRONG
] DAMN NEWSGROUP!
] ***PERSONAL ADS DO >NOT< BELONG IN SOC.SINGLES, THEY BELONG IN ONE OF***
] ***THE ALT.PERSONAL GROUPS! STOP POSTING PERSONAL ADS HERE!!!!!!!!!!!***
] 
] damn.
] r.


Come On Ron, Don't hold Back!
share with us what you Really Feel
on this issue.

ciao
drieux

-- 
MajorModernDayProblems: 
Just because you are a homicidal maniac
doesn't mean you don't have a sense of humor.
		- Barry Sadler
Xref: sparky soc.singles:35711 alt.sex:41280
From: jclark@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (J. Michael Clark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex
Subject: Re: The Classiest Pickup Lines
Date: 8 Jan 93 01:20:59 GMT
Organization: Ohio University CS Dept,. Athens

In article <1993Jan6.153113.10337@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> sorlin@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven J Orlin) writes:
>In article <1idntbINNfi@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>>"Come hither, oh beloved, and with me fulfill the most romantic impulses
>>that be thine."
>
>
>Uhh....umm...hey baby...can I take off my clothes and jump on you?????
>-- 
>"Nobody tells a Navy man when he's had enough to drink, cause only a Navy man
> knows when he's had enough to drink!"
>-Steven J Orlin   sorlin@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu  /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

Here's one that I heard ACTUALLY worked (I don't know if I believe it or not):
"Nice shoes, wanna fuck?"
Xref: sparky soc.singles:35332 soc.men:22162 soc.women:22150
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.men,soc.women
Subject: Re: Duck and Jive (was Re: Pre-Sex Contract )
Date: 5 Jan 93 05:19:17 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)

jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>>Someone (dropped from the attribution lines) writes:
>>>margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis) writes...
>>>>
>>>>Please report to james dutton for sensitivity training.
>>>
>>>Who is James Dutton?
>>
>>Who is james dutton?  Indeed, that's quite a question:  sure, we all know
>>james as "Mister Sensitivity" and as the soc.singles storyteller who
>>brings us the most poignant tales that illustrate true human feelings and
>>give all of us a deeper understanding on the human condition, but how many
>>of us really know james dutton the person?  How many of us can truly say
>>that we've had the chance to luxuriate in the warmth of his incredible
>>empathy and understanding, to feel ourselves grow as human beings just 
>>listening to his words of understanding and compassion?  Who else among
>>us is so sensitive that he develops sympathy cramps just from knowing
>>that someone else had to sit through "Ishtar"?  Who else is so sensitive
>>that he was personally responsible for the phrase "not a dry seat in the
>>house"?  (Don't worry--New, Improved, Extra-strength Depends have cured 
>>this problem.)  Who else is so sensitive that he develops sympathy "being
>>yelled at by a judge" pains just because his ex-wife neglected to pay child
>>support?
> 
>He sounds like a religious experience unto himself. 
>Strong enough for a man yet made for a women.
>

Seesters?

-- 
:::::::::::::::::::  Greg Andrews  gerg@netcom.com  :::::::::::::::::::
ObGuindon:  Roger Blunt has been saving newspapers most of his life.
            Later on, he figures to make some trees.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: Meeting women in clubs
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 13:50:21 GMT

In article <1993Jan9.033401.11813@panix.com> sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
>In article <1993Jan7.145359.10929@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>
>>What, did you think you *had* me there, Seth?  Hah.
>No, Nance, if I *had* you we'd both know it quite well; it certainly
>wouldn't be a matter of opinion.

Oh, indeed it would.  :-)
-- 
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Nance Colucci                                      att!ihlpl!colucci
"I'm a writer.  Be nice, or you'll wake up one day and be a story."
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Meeting wo/men in clubs
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 13:39:40 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.175137.2462@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>
>Again.  You have to look for the right people in the right places.  It's
>not wise to find the hottest babe in the place and zero in.  Look for people
>who are looking back.

Thank you Nance, maybe now I can get some peace and quite.
 
================================================================================
 Steatopygias's 'R' Us.          doh#0000000005 That ain't no Hottentot.
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles