From: jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca (John Henders)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Organization:  One of these days.
Subject: Re: His friend and nobody else's, Kevin Darcy!
	<H.ZxSjfuKEkg6@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> <H.9AEvj9C8frU@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca>
	<H.CpiVtJon3Yc@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca>
Reply-To: jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca
X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.00 Rev. Jan 16 1992
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1992 05:35:50 -0600

In <1992Apr2.034331.9050@rotag.mi.org>, Kevin Darcy writes:
>In article <H.CpiVtJon3Yc@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
>>In <1992Mar29.055700.26223@rotag.mi.org>, Kevin Darcy writes:

>
>Now you're starting to get on my nerves with your lies, you little shit. Let's 
>examine the original claim, shall we?
>
    Tsk, tsk Kevin. Let it go on the record that you are the first to be
reduced to scoolyard name calling.

>You queried:
>
>"Have you apogized for the thread you inflicted on news.admin which 
>                       ^^^
> generated mostly replies like the following.
>
>"In article <rdippold.701121829@cancun>, rdippold@cancun (Ron Dippold) writes:
> Both. Of. You. Get. Lost."
>			Date: 28 Mar 92 20:13:18 GMT
>			Message-ID: <H.9AEvj9C8frU@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca>
>
>I note your use of the definite article "the" indicating that ONE AND ONLY ONE
>THREAD was being discussed. 
>
    Now Kevin, if you're trying to claim that thread's don't mutate and 
change Subject: lines, you must be reading a different net than I am. 
Or are we arguing that only a " Strictly Literal " interpretation of the
one thread with a single subject lime can be called a thread?


>Date: 20 Mar 92 20:03:49 GMT
>      ^^^^^^^^^
>Article-I.D.: cancun.rdippold.701121829

>Okay, so we're talking about some thread occurring in March of 1992, right?
>
>Now, let's continue with your article...
>
>>First we see an article from Keegan, posted only to talk.abortion.
>>          From keegan@acm (James G. Keegan Jr.) Mon Dec 16 20:04:55 1991
>>          From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
>>          Newsgroups: talk.abortion
>>           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>          Subject: open message to kebbin
>>          Keywords: too dumb to learn from experience
>>          Message-ID: <0c1q=h-@rpi.edu>
>>          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>          Date: 14 Dec 91 01:14:42 GMT
>
>WHOA! TIME OUT! Are you trying to tell me that THIS SAME DAMN THREAD RAN
>CONTINUOUSLY FROM MID-DECEMBER 1991 TO MID-MARCH 1992?!?!?!? Afraid not, dude.
>                               
    What's so shocking about that, Kevin. You've been involved in threads
running well more than a mere three months, as any regular reader of 
alt.flame could hardly fail to notice.

>Methinks you're referring to a -different- thread now, not "the thread" [sic]
>you referred to earlier. Is that true, John? Is this a NEW claim, and, if so,
>do you retract your earlier claim?
>
    Well, first I notice you've left out the second article, clearly 
following up this article, showing your addition of news.admin to the
newsgroups line. Now you also deny that this discussion, which annoyed
readers of news.admin for several months, wasn't the same thread because 
it had a different subject line.  More of your " Strict Literalism " in
action, I guess.

    Oh yes, re: the "little shit" comment. I know you are, but what am I?


-- 
       John Henders      jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca
    I think your "evolutionary scale" needs an adjustment.  Either 
      that, or you've got your thumb on it. -> (lefty@apple.com)

Newsgroups: alt.flame