HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: le01167@portal.lasc.lockheed.com (Ron Nadel)
Subject: Re: * Movie Goofs list Candidates
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Co. - Rye Canyon
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 05:08:41 GMT

People have said things like:

>>>># Mary Poppins
>>>>-During the song "A Spoonful of Sugar" Mary extends her arm out the 
>>>> window and a red-breasted Roobin flies onto it, and takes part
>>>> in the song.  That bird is a North American bird, and does not
>>>> live in England.
>>>>
>>>Last time I looked there was one hopping around in my garden, it comes
>>>& watches whenever I do any gardening.
> 
>>I was the person who recommended this for the goof list, on the
>>advice of a friend of mine from the U.K. who asked me to point
>>out a robin to her.  She said that they had robins in the U.K., but
>>that they were nothing like the American Robin (with the red-breast).
> 
>>Was she nuts?  I mean, I know they have Robins in the U.K., but I didn't
>>think they were the red-breasted American-type Robin.
> 
>The European Robin does have a red breast (in fact, much redder than
>the American "Robin"), but is an entirely different bird from the 
>American one. The "American Robin" is a type of thrush. 
> 
>As far as I remember a stuffed American Robin features at the end of
>"Blue Velvet".

What about the African Robin?  Now, the average wind speed velocity of the
African Robin is such that if two of them were to grab a cocoanut by the
husk, they both could carry the cocoanut all the way to England.  Right?
I mean, am I right?

Ron
From: TJS107@psuvm.psu.edu (Sime)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: WORST SEQUEL????
Date: 15 Oct 92 22:31:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: psuvm.92289.183134TJS107
 <1992Oct15.162041.23687@leland.Stanford.EDU> <48653@shamash.cdc.com>
 <1992Oct15.202950.23862@news.acns.nwu.edu>
Organization: Penn State University

Halloween 3.
I'm pissed that they let them even use the name for that movie.

-Sime
                                                      Go Pirates!
The poison of love so pure it's deceiving,            Go Pens!
And deceit is all we have it's got to be over         Go Steelers!
It's dangerous this game we play you're
Killing me with words
          -Queensryche
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: thomas@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Beagle)
Subject: Re: best movie titles
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 20:18:05 GMT
Organization: Datamark International Ltd.

In article <1bh4f9INNsb4@agate.berkeley.edu> brianm@soda.berkeley.edu (Brian Markenson) writes:
>
>Also, Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure was a great title as a draw.

Popular rumour has it that the original title for the sequel was going
to be "Bill and Ted Go To Hell"
 
I love it!
-- 
    Thomas Beagle | thomas@datamark.co.nz  or  thomas@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz
Datamark Intl Ltd |
 Technical Writer | I don't need a disclaimer, I live in a sane society.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jeffw2@bmw.cfsmo.honeywell.com (Jeff Walberg)
Subject: Re: Your Favorite Cameo Appearance in a Film
Organization: Honeywell Commercial Flight Systems
	<1992Oct5.130605.14915@lut.ac.uk>
	<92283.105413RADDAMSW@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 18:47:22 GMT

Merv Griffin as the elevator killer in 'The Man With Two Brains'

("What are you doing here?")

Jeff
--
jeffw2@cfsmo.honeywell.com | The new phone sounds like a turkey
                           | Says "hurry, hurry, hurry"
                           | I'm gonna unplug that sucker
                           | There's nothin' I'd hate to miss...  -Greg Brown
From: dkrause@miami.acs.uci.edu (Doug Krause)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Robert Patrick in Wayne's World?
Date: 14 Oct 92 08:52:31 GMT
Organization: University of California, Irvine

In article <1992Oct13.210024.22799@Princeton.EDU> spencer@phoenix.princeton.edu (S. Spencer Sun) writes:
#This falls into the realm of the really unimportant, but while checking
#out Mandy Patinkin's entry in the Actor's List, I saw Robert Patrick
#listed as having been in Wayne's World.
#
#I remember watching the credits and seeing that the T1000-type cop wasn't
#played by Robert Patrick, but then again, while I've seen WW multiple
#times, I only really watched the credits the first time when it opened
#over half a year ago.
#
#Anyone know for sure?

It was Robert.  I think he's listed in the credits as "Bad Cop".

Douglas Krause                      One yuppie can ruin your whole day.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
University of California, Irvine    Internet: dkrause@hydra.acs.uci.edu
Welcome to Irvine:  Yuppieland USA  BITNET: DJKrause@uci.edu
From: farant@terapin.com (Faran Thomason)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Glengarry Glen Ross
Date: 6 Oct 92 22:33:30 PST
Organization: BBS

Somehow I don't think Pacino was suposed to have slept with Pryce. While I
could see it it's a bit extreme. Pryce was just a wimp and or a guy who wanted
something more out of life and Pacino was a good salesman.

Ed Harris was mad at Lemmon I believ beacuse he thought he would blame him for
the theft and he was they type of guy that had to belittle others to feel
stronger.
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Fish actors
Date: 14 Oct 92 19:53:17 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

I recently read an article/interview about Robert Redford's newest film:
_A River Runs Through It_.  It was written by Jim Robbins, and I was really
amused by some of the "fish stories" in the article.  You see the movie is 
largely about this one families love of fly fishing...

"How do you get a fish to strike on cue?  Enter Fernando the Fabulous Fish!
 He is a mechanical rainbow trout with photogenic lips that take insects off
 the water just like the real thing."

"Between 40 to 50 fish extras were need for the fish-catching scenes..."

[Fish *extras*?  I love it!]

The fishing 'advisor', John Dietsch paniced when the night before shooting,
all of them escaped.  He hurridly used his fishing prowess to catch enough 
in time for filming.

The fish 'star' of the movie was named Henry, described by Dietsch as "long, 
strong, and beautiful, absolutely gorgeous.  I felt he wanted to be part 
of the film."


So rush out to see Fernando, Henry, and all of their "fish extra" friends
in _A River Runs Through It_.

Greg Bole                               "You gotta look out for Goddamn
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu             number-one, pardon-the-vulgarity."   
                                             Dustin Hoffman in _Hero_
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:29740 rec.games.trivia:3269
From: hamel@uakari.primate.wisc.edu (Ray Hamel)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.games.trivia
Subject: Insects on film
Date: 8 Oct 1992 08:17:18 -0500
Organization: UW-Madison Primate Center
NNTP-Posting-Host: uakari.primate.wisc.edu


	I'm trying to compile a list of films in which insects play
an important role.  Some I have already discovered are:

	THEM!, THE DEADLY BEES, THE SWARM, CREEPSHOW, THE NAKED
	JUNGLE (ants), PINOCCHIO (Jiminmy Cricket), BEGINNING OF THE
	END (giant grasshoppers), THE DEADLY MANTIS, MYSTERIOUS ISLAND
	(giant bumblebee), PANIC AT LAKEWOOD MANOR/ANTS, THE HELLSTROM
	CHRONICLE, ALICE IN WONDERLAND (caterpillar).

	There is also a British film about a colony of super-intelligent
	ants, the title of which is eluding me.

	Please do not include films about spiders -- they are not insects.

	Send your suggestions via e-mail to hamel@primate.wisc.edu.  I
will summarize and post in the near future.

Ray Hamel
University of Wisconsin
From: raimo@think.com (Bill Raimo)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: RKO Home Video
Date: 14 Oct 1992 15:00:39 -0400
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation

Does anyone know the address or phone number to RKO Home Video?

-Bill
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 20:59:49 GMT
Subject: Re: The Last of the Mohicans
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

In rec.arts.movies, Rob_Simons@mindlink.bc.ca (Rob Simons) writes:
> 
> "The Last of the Mohicans", like Mann's other works, highly favours style over
> substance.  Although visually pleasing, except for the "under the waterfall
> scene" and the laughable slow motion segments, there is little else worth
> praising.

Really?  I am not usually sucked in by a loud soundtrack, but I
thought that the scottish music by Dougie Mclaine was pretty
damned evocative during the ending chase scene.  I liked it a lot.

Did anyone else notice this?

doug

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: Mr. Arkadin/Confidential Report HELP!!
Keywords: Welles, Arkadin
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 19:18:19 GMT

In article <1992Oct14.164817.4798@news2.cis.umn.edu> donnell@barnacle.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous) writes:
>I was reading "Video Watchdog"'s special reports on "Mr. Arkadin" with 
>some interest. I watched it on Bravo last nite <despite calling it
>"Mr. Arkadin", they showed a print of the alternate/european version
>"Confidential Report"> and thought it was great, but even this seemed
>a little choppy.
>Video Watchdog says that they have discovered another version of this film,
>called "Mr. Arkadin", in the budget bins of some video stores. Redally 
>cheap! And this cut is longer than any other discovered so far.

According to a recent article in Film Comment, there are at least 7
versions of "Mr. Arkadin".  Now, when you actually read the article,
you discover that the author includes the novel it was based on, at least
one version of the script, and a radio version, but there were still
around 4 different cuts of the film, if my memory serves.  The author
goes into some detail about the differences in each.  

I can't help you find the version you want, unfortunately.

--
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu
From: 01mbmccabe@bsu-ucs.uucp
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: The Dark Backwards
Date: 13 Oct 92 04:25:03 GMT

Has anyone heard of or know what happened to/with a film I heard called The
Dark Backwards?  I saw a preview on The Entertainment Channel about a year ago,
but nothing since.  

			-Matt McCabe
			 B.S.U.
From: jseaver@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Jason John Seaver)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Under Siege
Date: 11 Oct 1992 00:14:22 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <9210101655.AA24459@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com> GCTHORNE@idbsu.idbsu.edu (Broward Horne) writes:

>       Now THIS is the movie I was expecting after "Above The Law".
>       Seagal has revived my faith.  Sure, it's got some cliches, etc.
>       It's got the token woman.  It's got the token bad guys.
>
>       But it held my interest.  The beginning was just right.  Just
>   when you're questioning what you *think* should be happening...
>
>       Tommy Lee Jones is outstanding as a would-be Sixties revolutionary
>   turned mercenary skittering along the cliff of sanity.  Hilarious at
>   times, disheartening at others.  Right on the edge of ham.
>
>       Good show.

	I agree.  It's the first Seagal movie I've seen, and I thought it was
a lot of fun and an entertaining way to spend $3.50 and an afternoon.  I may
rent some of his other moives, but probably won't; this is really a different
sort of movie than what I've usually seen advertised with him (military vs. 
cops).

					-Jay
From: a0s5108@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Neal and Mara Priestly)
Subject: Re: Identify this quote
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 06:11:48 GMT

In article <dewey-061092160314@sebastian.centerline.com> dewey@centerline.com (Devan F. Dewey) writes:
>OK, we have some ideas but we're not positive.
>
>The quote is: "Be afraid. ... Be very afraid."
>

-Geena Davis _The Fly_ (remake)

>
>Please, only those who are sure about this need apply. We've
>already got plenty of maybe's
>


Just saw it 2 days ago.  I'm sure it's there.

>Thanks tons!

Welcome....

-Neal Priestly
From: mftjs@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (T. Jerry Scott)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS
Date: 12 Oct 92 18:35:34 GMT
Organization: Educational Computing Network

In article <6790@transfer.stratus.com> lmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com writes:
>I want to concur with Mark Leeper's review.  It's definitely worth
>seeing on the big screen, and it movie rapidly presents quite a bit
>of information about the French and Indian War.  Daniel Day-Lewis
>never looked better!  <g>
>
>Quibble:  Am I the only one tired of the Dances With Wolves-inspired
>trend of bad Indians looking like punks and good Indians wearing
>buckskins?  Also, it seemed like the Indians had way too many guns
>and were way-too good shots (except for Nathaniel (Hawkeye) for
>whom this flaw can be foregiven)??

Another Quibble:  After seeing the movie this weekend, I concur with
the above.  I thought the love affair was just too easily done from
the girl's viewpoint.  It seemed that she should have waited a little
before falling for him.

A final point about the movie.  I thought the ending was a modern day
Tale of Two Cities, as the English officer gave his life for her.  Also
the sister took her life rather than be with the Indian, after the other
M had fought and died for her.  Bottom line: Good flick, well worth 
seeing, even though it was hard to get in tune with the fighting using
methods of so long ago.

Thanks for your Message.   			       Keep in Touch.
=====================================================================
Thomas J. Scott  (aka Dr. J.)			Phone: 309-298-1452
Western Illinois University			mftjs@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: bandwen@eagle.larc (bando)
Subject: SNL: Joe Pesci's Opening Monologue 
Reply-To: bandwen@eagle.larc (bando)
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA USA
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 13:01:42 GMT

I missed the beginning of SNL this week, so could someone please
tell me what exactly did Pesci say about Sinead O.'s outbust
last week.
  -thanks
        bando


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jchrist@convex.com (Jeff Christenson)
Subject: Re: Under Siege
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 21:09:49 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In article <1992Oct8.233804.8601@rtfm.mlb.fl.us> luckey@rtfm.mlb.fl.us (Jon Luckey) writes:
>   1) Steven crosses paths with Bad Guys
>   2) Bad Guys f**k with Steven's family
>   3) Steven kills everyone.
>
>But in this movie, Steven plays a sailor on a ship.  How
>can Steven's family be f**ked with?  Could Steven actually
>be breaking new ground in this movie?
>
>(Actually, I guess you might argue that for a Sailor, the Navy
>is his family)

(spoilers)

It's the captain that is Steven's "family" in this movie.  I don't think we're
told why the captain took on Segal as his cook, but we know that they are 
friends.  So, when things start happening, Steven is merely perturbed.  But
after he discovers the captain's body, Steven is pissed-off.

Also, I'm guessing that Jones was responsible for the "bad intelligence" that
killed most of Segal's SEAL team in Panama.  Was there any other reason that
they were familiar with each other?

I would say that Steven Segal has won the long-running contest of "Who can
fire the largest gun in an action-adventure movie."

-- 
Disclaimer:  The above opinions are mine, not my employer's; etc., etc.
Quote:  "An orifice is an amusing thing, all right." - Hobbes, to Calvin
From: v076r95v@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (The Nature Boy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: CANDYMAN!!!
Date: 16 Oct 92 19:50:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


	I got the chance last night at 12 A.M. to see this movie here at my
school.  Sneak preview and for free!  I'll say this much, I'd pay $6 to see it
again!  This movie was incredibly done.  Clive Barker definitely outdid himself
in this movie.  The gore is not so bad.  Lots of blood, but not lots of rip n'
thrash gore, like Freddy Krueger movies.  I would recommend this movie to anyone
who loves getting scared..'cause trust me..it'll scare ya.  By the way, you'll
never be able to look into a mirror straight again. :)
					PHOENIX 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Bernard Eric Cana      "We go out in the world and take our chances.        |
| 490 Spaulding Quad      Fate is the just the weight of circumstances.       |
| SUNYAB                  That's the way that lady luck dances.               |
| Buffalo, NY 14261       Roll the bones!  Roll the bones!"                   |
| (716) 645-5008                      -Rush "Roll The Bones"                  |
| in%"V076R95V@UBVMS.BITNET" or in%"V076R95V@UBVMS.CC.BUFFALO.EDU"            |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:29627 alt.cult-movies:8777
From: mlh@eddy.austin.ibm.com (Mike Haskell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: the absolute worst movie of all time, so bad it's bad
Date: 5 Oct 92 22:02:20 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <92278.015130TJS107@psuvm.psu.edu> Sime <TJS107@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>I loved Night of the Comet when I first saw it, and I watched it merely because
> the ad for it in the cable guide had a picture of a cheerleader with an UZI.
>I had to watch it just cuz of that...  Sure, it was cheesy, but I liked it
>nonetheless.... Very entertaining for a horrible movie...
>I'm still in love with Catherine Mary Stewart.  She's a babe! SCHWING!   Good
>in Mischief too.  Not to mention the Last Starfighter....
>

I dunno... I thought her sister in the movie was better.  "Daddy, would have
gotten' us UZI's"  (I thought that line was the best out of the film).
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: msb@sq.sq.com (Mark Brader)
Subject: Re: Hero and Meet John Doe
Organization: SoftQuad Inc., Toronto, Canada
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 22:43:49 GMT


Following an analysis which is correctly headed by a spoiler warning,
Peter Reiher (reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu) concludes:

> I won't argue that "Meet John Doe" isn't the better of the two films -
> it is, but, then, it's better than around 99% of all films made in the
> 30's, 40's, and 50's, so saying that "Hero" isn't quite up to its
> standards is not much of a condemnation.  I think "Hero" is a solid
> film with a strong script that is actually about something.  There are
> flaws in the script, many more than in "Meet John Doe's" script.  Capra
> was much better suited to direct "Meet John Doe" than Stephen Frears was
> to direct "Hero".  Still, "Hero" is a worthy film, and I recommend it.

I agree with these conclusions right down the line, and hence recommend
the movie also.  I'd like to add one thing.  The advertising that I saw
for this movie led me to expect a comedy, and this, it is not.  I was
getting close to walking out when about 30 minutes had gone by with only
the occasional laugh... but at this point it became clear that this was
basically a serious movie, albeit one with comic relief from time to time.

Shortly after seeing the movie, I saw Siskel and Ebert review it.  They
both felt that it was seriously disappointing; they said its roots were
in the screwball comedy genre and it failed to live up to that.  I think
they went into it with the same expectation that I did, and made up their
minds too early about what basis to use for the review.

Frank Maloney, in his posted review, called it a "serious comedy", and
this is closer to what I thought I saw.  I'd accept "comedy-drama" or
"drama with comic relief", but at this point we're quibbling about defin-
itions.  Anyway, see the movie, but don't expect to walk out laughing.
-- 
Mark Brader			"How can we believe that?"
SoftQuad Inc., Toronto		"Because this time it's true!"
utzoo!sq!msb, msb@sq.com		-- Lynn & Jay: YES, PRIME MINISTER

This article is in the public domain.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: firestar@leland.Stanford.EDU (Lipton Ann Meredith)
Subject: Re: Movie Goofs List
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: rec
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 18:35:12 GMT


I dunno if this was mentioned before, but I believe in Supergirl there's a
shot where she flies around the Statue of Liberty -- only the statue
holds the torch in the wrong hand.  I'm not sure this is true, but if it
is, it's quite a biggie.

Firestar


-- 
I don't bite, you know.    | Find me and turn thy | It is better to have loved 
Unless it's called for.    | back on heaven.      | and lost than to have your
-- Audrey Hepburn, Charade | -- R. W. Emerson     | finger caught in a blender.
*******************************************************************************
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:30182 alt.cult-movies:9043
From: Joseph.J.Marcheso.Jr.@dartmouth.edu (Joseph J. Marcheso Jr.)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: the absolute worst movie of all time, so bad it's bad
Date: 14 Oct 92 04:34:07 GMT
 <1992Oct12.100714.24910@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au> 
 <1992Oct13.235258.2444@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>  
 <Oct14.015554.77911@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a5@newshost.dartmouth.edu

Well my friend just walked in and has just proclaimed the WORST movie
ever are you ready (drum roll)

              THE YOG MONSTER FROM SPACE!!!
surprised?
From: dhartung@chinet.chi.il.us (Dan Hartung)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Deckard as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Date: 14 Oct 92 00:01:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: chinet.Bw342K.A39
Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX

01mbmccabe@bsu-ucs.uucp writes:
>> It is still the main theme, because 'Deckard is a replicant'--claim
>> comes out only at the end, when Deckard finds the folded unicorn from
>> the floor.
>
>I'm new hear, and so am just tuning in to the discussion, so could someone fill
>me in as to the connection between the origami unicorn(or whatever it was) and
>the supposition that Deckard was a Replicant?

Because of Deckard's "dream" about the unicorn earlier in the movie.  
Supposedly this represents a leitmotif that is known to be common in
replicants' dreams.

The whole argument makes no sense to me.  There are terrific leaps of
logic necessary to make it work, and one has to ignore contradictory
statements made by characters, and ultimately it makes the movie far
less interesting.  I don't blame someone who subscribes to this theory
for not liking the movie.

But speaking from a literary and story structure point of view, the
clear interpretation is that Deckard is a human questioning the non-
human nature of replicants.  The center of the film is the leap he
makes to sympathy for the targets of his gun.  The supposed parallels
between himself and replicants are NOT evidence of his secret 
replicnat nature, but things that make him question his very real
humanity and just what makes it different from the synthetic humanity
of the replicants -- or what makes them different from himself.

-- 
HYPOCRISY HALL OF FAME:                  | Dan Hartung               |  Ask me
"I would think very hard and long about  | dhartung@chinet.chi.il.us |  about
voting for a presidential candidate who  | Birch Grove Software      | Rotaract!
has had an affair."  -- Gennifer Flowers!
From: RADDAMSW@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Your Favorite Cameo Appearance in a Film
Date: 9 Oct 92 09:54:13 GMT
 <gDcZRB3w164w@kryton.UUCP> <1992Oct5.130605.14915@lut.ac.uk>
Organization: University of Liverpool

It has to be Bruce Campbell in Sam Raimi's 'Darkman'. No question!

A.J. Mockler c/o S.J. Wooding