HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: ENCHANTED APRIL
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 92 20:03:34 GMT

In article <1992Sep8.150646.11936@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> fod@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Frank O'Donnell) writes:
>frankm@microsoft.com (Frank R.A.J. Maloney) writes:
>>ENCHANTED APRIL, despite it thinness, its incredibility, is
>>both magical and very funny. 

>It was indeed a nice little movie, and managed to achieve a
>lot on what were evidently somewhat slim resources.  At times,
>however, it had to me the unmistakable look of skimping that
>betrayed what was apparently its low budget (i.e. they couldn't
>afford a period train, so they used a shot of a light coming
>through mist and something that looked sort of like the interior
>of a train car to suggest the train trip; also, the interiors
>of the "castle" did not correspond well to the exterior shots
>of the villa in which the story was supposed to have taken place).

I can't answer for the train shot, but according to Mike Newell, the
director, both the interiors and exteriors were filmed in a single
Italian "castle".  It was, in point of fact, the one that the book
that served as a basis for the film was written about.  Newell expressed
a certain frustration upon discovering that he sometimes had to stage
scenes exactly as written in the book, because the layout of the house
would not allow the alternatives he wanted.

It is, of course, not only possible, but likely, that Newell cheated
on details like which rooms connect to which other rooms, what's on
the other side of a door, etc.  But all the rooms, according to Newell,
really were in there.  So, if you didn't like the way they matched with
the exteriors, you must complain to the architect, not to the filmmakers.

--
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu
From: vanover@bcsaic.boeing.com (Jann VanOver)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Film with the least actors
Date: 4 Sep 92 17:47:22 GMT
Organization: Boeing Computer Services AI Center, Seattle

In article <Bu00t5.C6p@news.cso.uiuc.edu> rnmg1200@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (A Lady and her Walrus) writes:
>In article <81830@bcsaic.boeing.com> vanover@bcsaic.boeing.com (Jann VanOver) writes:
>>However, NOONE has mentioned Sleuth, which might have been what Cathy
>          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>They haven't?  Then why was the one guy raving for everybody to stop posting
>about it?
>
>>was thinking of.  This one has JUST two actors, Michael Caine and --
>>Lawrence Olivier. 
>
>The Walrus

OK, OK, OK - at the time I posted, MY newssite hadn't had any articles
mentioning Sleuth.  I had even waited 3 or four days from the first
"least actors" post, expecting to see a BUNCH.  I guess I just have a
slow newsfeed.  I HAVE, of course seen the deluge that has passed through
since then!
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
VanOver@atc.boeing.com
       "Why don't y'all go home?"     Bette Davis in The Little Foxes
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: brian@mtl.mit.edu (brian foley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: movie with 'blows' in the title?
Date: 10 Sep 92 13:23:06 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories


Thanks to all of you who responded 'The 400 Blows', (and also to 

those who didn't ;^) ).


Brian
From: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Dune, embarrassing? - whales
Keywords: n
Date: 15 Sep 92 19:40:19 GMT
Reply-To: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)

In article <1992Sep9.165929.25867@unlv.edu>, frank@snooks.isri.unlv.edu
(Frank Jenkins) writes:
|>In article <1992Sep9.144813.27448@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>,
ren@Turing.ORG (Karen Prestemon) writes:
|>) From: ren@Turing.ORG (Karen Prestemon)
|>) Subject: Re: Dune, embarrassing?
|>) Organization: The Turing Project, Charlottesville Virginia.
|>) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 07:48:13 PDT
|>) 
|>) 
|>) Can someone PLEASE tell me what those big whales floating around in space
|>) were?  Its been a while since I've read the book or seen the movie, but
|>) tha one aspect of the film kind of stuck with me.  Weree the whales in 
|>) Dune in any way related to that huge salami that came for all the whales
|>) in Star Trek IV?????
|>) 
|>) What gives??
|>) 
|>) --Karen
|>) 
|>
|>I have been wondering also. I think it had something to do with those
huge, gross
|>creatures that appeared in a tank in one scene and intimidated the
Jose Ferrer character, but I would appreciate someone clearing it up.
|>

   I'll try to answer, but I haven't read any Dune books, nor seen
anything other than the standard (~2 hours) version of the film, so this
might be crap. I fully expect flames from Dune (books) fans for my
inaccuracies, but at least this may be testament as to whether people
who have never read the books have a hope in hell of understanding the film...

   The "whales" are "Guild Navigators". The one in the tank that visits
Jose Ferrer is the same sort of creature as the one "floating around in
space". As far as I got, these things used to be human but were mutated
by the spice. This mutation has given them special powers: in particular
the ability to "fold space" - which seems to mean being able to "see" 2
points in space at the same time no matter the distance between them.
This ability is needed for distant space travel so the "whales" are very
very important entities (which is why I guess the Emperor has to obey
them). I think the one floating in space was actually in a tank in the
spaceship that was travelling (to Dune) in a spice-rich environment and
was "folding space" when we saw it - that is, navigating for that ship.
                      
+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Gary Bradley        |   "You receive a love letter from me and |
| ORACLE Corp, UK     |                  you're f*cked forever!" |
| Edinburgh, SCOTLAND |        - Frank Booth ("Blue Velvet")     |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| "God damn the censor man"                                      |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
From: baldwin@csservera.scs.usna.navy.mil (J.D. Baldwin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 10 Sep 92 18:43:25 GMT
Organization: Comp. Sci. Dep't., U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD

Oh, I've got it:  "The Black Hole."  You know, the Disney movie where the
good robot goes to Heaven in the end and the bad robot goes to Hell.  

Top THAT one!
--
 From the catapult of:              |+| "If anyone disagrees with anything I
   _,_  J. D. Baldwin, Comp Sci Dept|+| say, I am quite prepared not only to
 _|70|___:::)=}-  U.S. Naval Academy|+| retract it, but also to deny under
 \      /   baldwin@usna.navy.mil   |+| oath that I ever said it." --T. Lehrer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: rjf@cbnews.cb.att.com (robert.j.fredette)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jurassic Park and the Hurricane.
Summary: 15 day shoot
Date: 15 Sep 92 18:04:43 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Sep14.100139.1@mdcbbs.com>, rivero@mdcbbs.com writes:
> 
>   A contact of mine at Amblin reports that Steven Spielburg had just 
> finished filming the Hawaiin portion of "Jurassic Park" when the hurricane 
> blew through Kauai. The cast and crew were staying at the Westin Kauai (just 
> a coconuts flight down the road from where I was married) and survived 
> with few incidents. According to the report, Steven ventured outside during
> the eye of the storm to admire the spectacular sky (having been through an
> "eye" myself, I can understand this) while producer Kathleen Kennedy
> stood in the doorway yelling at him to get back inside.
> 
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> |  Michael Rivero        rivero@dev8j.mdcbbs.com     "A Human's Human!"  |
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> |                       I CAME,  I SAW,  I DIVORCED                      |
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    According to CNN, the Juriassic Park crew had compleated 14 days of a 15
day shoot. They lost the last day of location shooting because of the storm,
returned to the mainland and studio before heading to Costa Rica for more
location work.

          No e-mail please, cause thats not me above, this is me below.
********************************************************************************
             I STILL AM JMF              | Many thanks to RJF for making his    
  AT&T NETWORK SYS still on loan to BTL  | account available to me from time 
  in user's hell or is it, a user from   | to time. 
  hell, or is it a hell of a user??????  | Joe Fedenyszen       508-960-4566 
********************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
Subject: Re: "Reservoir Dogs" review. (DO NOT) See this film!
Organization: Marriott Library, University of Utah
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 18:26:22 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.184115.119252@marshall.wvnet.edu> rcbi27@marshall.wvnet.edu (DBRUM) writes:

>In article <jjonsson.143@alexandria.lib.utah.edu>, jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu writes:
>> In article <1992Sep7.170258.304@dct.ac.uk> mctsrj@dct.ac.uk writes: 
>> BOYCOTT RESERVOIR DOGS! Do not see this film unless you appreciate 
>> unbelievable amounts of ultra-graphic violence, unrelenting racism, and have 
>> a tolerance for deep seated sociopathy. This film is unredeemable 
>> contemptible and sick.

>Oh boy! Sounds almost like another BLUE VELVET or something. I can hardly
>wait to see it now!

>--danny

I liked Blue Velvet. I'm warning you, Reservoir Dogs is like nothing you've 
ever seen before in a "mainstream" albeit independent film. 

	At Sundance, Quentin Tarantino, the director of this "film" was 
there, and was asked why he put so much blood and ultra-violence in this 
film. He looked at the audience with a straight face and said, "I just like 
blood and guns." That still doesn't explain the torture scene, nor the 
disgusting level of mindless racism pervasive in this dog.

	On one level I'm sorry I said to Boycott this film, as I don't think 
anyone should do anything without judging it for themselves. I will say 
this: I'm warning you. Most of you will not like it. Some of you will hate 
it as much as I do. And hopefully I will scare a few people away.

	Another hit on RD is the unbelievably stupid ending.

	Ok everybody, run out and see it now, but don't blame me when you 
vomit on yourself.


Jeff Jonsson
Marriott Library System Support, University of Utah.
==============================================================================
--"It's the sound of the secret--  jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
-- machinery at the center of  --  jjonsson@utahlib.bitnet
-- the world." -Cliff Steele   --  "You talkin' to me?"
From: otto@jybox.jyu.fi (Otto J. Makela)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarrassing Movie(s)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 03:42:02 EDT
Organization: Jyvaskyla Electronic Mailbox

sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter) writes:

> Oh, I almost forgot another most embarrassing film: "Penn & Teller Get
> Killed."   Go ahead, defend this movie if you can.  Make my day.

Not defending it, not having seen it or even heard of it, but...

I always thought these guys were the ones who do a (IMHO rather good)
magic show.  What gives ?  What is the movie about ?

   /* * * Otto J. Makela <otto@jybox.jyu.fi> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */
  /* Phone: +358 41 613 847, BBS: +358 41 211 562 (V.32bis/USR-HST,24h/d) */
 /* Mail: Kauppakatu 1B18/SF-40100 Jyvaskyla/Finland, ICBM: 62.14N25.44E */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: maher@umbc4.umbc.edu (Dr. Michael Maher; ACS (GUEST))
Subject: great voices
Organization: Univ. of MD, Baltimore County
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 22:36:58 GMT

I have only followed this thread intermittently, but
seem to notice a predominance of men's voices.  I certainly
endorse Sir Ralph Richardson's name recently  entered, and
would add Paul Scofield, whom I recently heard on stage in
London.

However, there is a certain well bred, almost musical voice
one used to hear in movies, and I'm sure on stage in the 
30's, which would be hard to imagine today.  Think of the
voice of the good witch Gwendolyn? in Wizard of Oz.  Also 
the wife of the chief psychiatrist in Harvey, which ran 
recently on television.  Can anyone remember other such
actresses.  Perfect diction and a gentle lilting tone.




Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27512 alt.cult-movies:7804
From: donnell@manowar.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 12 Sep 92 21:05:06 GMT
Organization: none

In article <bahn.183@main.mndly.umn.edu> bahn@main.mndly.umn.edu (Christopher Bahn) writes:
>In article <1992Aug31.215528.29891@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> mlh@eddy.austin.ibm.com (Mike Haskell) writes:
>
>
>> What is the most embarassing movie you have ever seen?  (What I mean by
>> embarassing, is that you feel absolutely miniscule when the lights come
>> up and you HAVE to walk out of the theater with every other bonehead
>> who bought a ticket to this turkey).  Movies on video don't count as
>> your stupidity is hidden by the walls of your house. :-)
>
>This is easy, and I'm surprised nobody's mentioned it yet. "Twin Peaks: Fire 
>Walk With Me" is the worst film I have _ever_ seen, which is unfortunate 
>because i spent two hours convincing my sister to see it with me...I even 
>paid for her ticket. If you hated Highlander II, you'll want to lynch Lynch.

Pardon me for perhaps, being dense, but what did David Lynch have to do with
"Highlander 2"?
Just curious...

					--Judex--
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: morrow@fnalo.fnal.gov (The Elmo Strikes Back)
Subject: Re: REVIEW: SNEAKERS
Organization: Hensonfilm
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 05:15:28 GMT
X-Posted-From: fnalo.fnal.gov
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <1992Sep15.190833.6845@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>, 2fatguys@tdis.icpsr.umich.edu (Too Fat Guys) writes:
> Roger:	And this is really the only portion of the movie whose technical
> 	accuracy can be questioned. Using the black box, they break into
> 	several services, such as the "National Power Grid".

	Check your hearing aid, Rog :-)  It was the "Nashville Power Grid"
they were hacking into.
	The movie was absurdly lacking in technical details--never even
bothering to define "Sneaker" for the audience!  And air-traffic controller
computers and power grid computers seem to put rlogins directly into *Action
Scenes* rather than the usual login malarkey we're all familiar with.
	On the other hand, great cast, and lots of funny lines.
-- 
"After I'm dead, I would rather have people ask why I have no monument than why
I have one."--Cato the Elder                                                   
  
elmo (morrow@physics.rice.edu,morrow@fnal.fnal.gov)
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27495 alt.cult-movies:7788
From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 12 Sep 92 15:07:55 GMT
Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU
Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH


fajack@cc.usu.edu writes:

>	Anyway, I swear that I'll never to go another Steven King's adaptation
>movie.  I guess Misery is just a fluke of all those BAD BAD Steven King's
>adapation.

Christine stank, certainly, but the opening scene on the assembly line
(with Bad_to_the_Bone as the music) was great fun.
-- 
   Brice Dowaliby, Fluent Inc., 10 Cavendish Court, Lebanon, NH  03766
                         bd%fluent@dartmouth.edu        
             I don't speak for them, they don't speak for me
                              DoD # 0698
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Re: 007 Quiz-Answers...
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 21:53:20 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <1992Sep10.180441.5019@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> hades@Dartmouth.Edu writes:
>dlee@oasys.dt.navy.mil (David Lee) writes:
>
>>3. Dr. No; From Russia With Love; Goldfinger; Thunderball; You Only Live
>>   Twice; On Her Majesty's Secret Service; Diamonds Are Forever; Live and
>>   Let Die; The Man With the Golden Gun; The Spy Who Loved Me; Moonraker;
>>   For Your Eyes Only; Octopussy; A View To a Kill; The Living Daylights;
>>   Licence To Kill....  16 movies
>
>    Ever heard of "Never Say Never Again"? There are 17 Bond movies.

And Casino Royale - it still counts because even though it's a farce,
it's amazingly faithful to the book in many respects. It even has a 
woven rug beater prominently displayed during the torture scene!
-- 
John Switzer               | 50 years from now, nobody will
                           | remember Candice Bergen or Murphy
74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | Brown, but every school kid will
jrs@netcom.com             | be taught about President Quayle.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: ren@Turing.ORG (Karen Prestemon)
Subject: Re: Dune, embarrassing?
Keywords: n
Organization: The Turing Project, Charlottesville Virginia.
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 14:48:13 GMT


Can someone PLEASE tell me what those big whales floating around in space
were?  Its been a while since I've read the book or seen the movie, but
tha one aspect of the film kind of stuck with me.  Weree the whales in 
Dune in any way related to that huge salami that came for all the whales
in Star Trek IV?????

What gives??

--Karen

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: goepping@msi-s20.msi.umn.edu (Jason Goeppinger [Math])
Subject: Re: Movies you heard were good but sucked (was Re: Most Embarassing Movie)
Organization: MSI
	<JASON.92Sep4144357@ab20.larc.nasa.gov>
	<sbarnhar-040992151951@morril6t-10.micro.umn.edu>
	<1992Sep9.185510.26219@b23a.b23a.ingr.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:13:01 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.185510.26219@b23a.b23a.ingr.com> alfa@b23a.b23a.ingr.com (Laura Pina) writes:

   [Supposedly bad movies deleted]

   Too many more to list.  Must get back to work!

Two words Mystic Pizza.

Cough. Gak.
--

	Jason Goeppinger
	(goepping@s1.msi.umn.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: goldek@aix02.ecs.rpi.edu (Ken Goldenberg)
Subject: Sneakers--not a review (sort of)
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 06:56:55 GMT

Sneakers:  Not really a review
 
I just saw Sneakers at a sneak preview at RPI, and... wow.
 
This movie was really cool.  Okay, part of the appeal was seeing it in a
room full of RPI geeks, but I really liked it.
 
(But where else will a mention of Gauss bring down the house?  :)
 
The tech involved was a bit much to believe--not least of which was the
high-speed image processing, the 1992 acoustic-connect modem, or the
unrealistic reverse engineering of the "black box."
 
The plot was really solid, though, and the movie is paced quickly enough
that the time really flies.
 
I really believe that this movie is worth (if any movie is) $7.00 and I 
may just end up seeing it again.


				-Mitch

-- 
goldek@rpi.edu  (K M G)   *|| I can't complain but sometimes I still do    
-----------------------   *||                   -Joe Walsh 
SkateAway, that's all     *||______________________________________________
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27666 alt.cult-movies:7869
From: csroc@dime.prime.com (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 14 Sep 92 18:31:04 GMT
Reply-To: csroc@dime.UUCP (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Organization: Prime Computervision, Bedford MA

>>	Anyway, I swear that I'll never to go another Steven King's adaptation
>>movie.  I guess Misery is just a fluke of all those BAD BAD Steven King's
>>adapation.

Don't forget about other good to fantastic King adaptations:
The Shining
Carrie
Salems Lot
The Dead Zone
Stand By Me
From: yousten@atlantis.CS.ORST.EDU (Ken Yousten)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Anthony Perkins: Aids: Died yesterday.
Keywords: aids,physcho
Date: 14 Sep 92 04:50:00 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Outreach Services - Oregon State University

peterme@ocf.berkeley.edu (Peter Merholz) writes:
>>> This is the first occurance of a famous person contracting the disease
>>> and having it run it's course and the media NOT making a show of it.
>
>Brad who? I think that's the point of the first post, which is that
>Perkins was a bona fide movie star (if for nothing beyond Psycho, which
>is definitely plenty)...

Personally, I found it a bit amusing that the original poster made the
claim at all.  Think of it-- "This is the first time that I have not known
about it."

If you ever need a job, the Enquirer is sure to jump at the chance.

><Because I seriously doubt he received it in heterosexual union, considering
>the odds against it... It would be unwise to further scare the heterosexual
>population about AIDS since the odds are still phenomenally against 
>transmitting it heterosexually...>

You always know the true causes of all deaths in the world also?  No one
ever tells me anything....
--
Ken Yousten  (Currently living in Champaign, IL)  yousten@atlantis.cs.orst.edu
	 "Her voice-- I know other words, but we'll stick with this
	 	   one-- was nice."   -- Dashiell Hammett
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: montyb@alpha.aosg.gsf.dec.com (Monty C. Brandenberg)
Subject: Re: Holden's Eyes (was Re: Blade Runner...(SPOILERS))
Organization: AOSG
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 17:27:21 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.002907.24953@wam.umd.edu>, dododge@wam.umd.edu (David O. Dodge) writes:
|> The film has other things which are most likely just for the audience's
|> benefit. For example when Deckard looks at Rachael's photograph, it
|> "moves" for just an instant. Also if you listen closely during Rachael's
|> VK test you can hear Deckard talking about the spider (which he later
|> brings up in his apartment to prove to her that she is a replicant).
|> 

This illusion of motion bothered me for a long time so I went over this
sequence frame by frame on the laserdisk and my conclusion is that there
is absolutely no movement in the photo.  Moving shadows from Deckard's
living room area fall on the photo and cause that illusion.

As for the eyes, how about this explanation.  Scott's compositions require
the use of a great deal of side lighting.  As a result, a case of 'red-eyes'
made it through a cut and when the dailies were reviewed, it was perceived
as an interesting effect.  So, it was deliberately added to subsequent 
shots for it's surrealistic effect.

re: sixth replicant.  Take this for what it's worth but the Criterion
edition of BR is followed by a section of addons including a fan(atic)'s
notes on the movie.  Where he acquired his information isn't clear (though
there is an absurdly long bibliography in this material) but he claims
that the sixth replicant is 'Mary', a perfect mother figure whom Deckard
kills by shooting into a closed closet.  I believe this retirement is
similar to one in PKD's short story (it's been a long time since I've 
read it).
From: poy@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Stephen Poy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Brazil/Marx Bros. Question
Date: 14 Sep 92 22:49:21 GMT
Reply-To: poy@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Stephen Poy)
Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD

i was wondering if anyone could tell me what marx brothers
movie jill is watching while she is in the tub.

i remember seeing groucho and the guys walking around the room
arms extended.  they are trying to shake each others hand, and
groucho says "are you boys trying to give me the run around ?"

this seen occurs in Brazil right before they take away Buttle

thanks

-stephen