From: schuck@fraser.sfu.ca (Bruce Jonathan Schuck)
Subject: Re: "Film proves JFK shot from behind, scientist says"
Reply-To: Bruce_Schuck@sfu.ca
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 07:24:44 GMT

6489mcadamsj@vms.csd.mu.edu (John McAdams) writes:

>In article <schuck.726197353@sfu.ca>, schuck@fraser.sfu.ca (Bruce Jonathan Schuck) writes:
>>
>>
>>It can be explained as material from the rear exit wound seen by most
>>if not all the Parkland medical personal.
>>
>>The Neurosurgeon attending, Kemp Clark , said the right rear cornder
>>of JFK's skull was blown off.
>>
>>With all the evidence, I interpret this as a shot from the right front
>>impacting near the ear or slightly behind it, removing the right rear
>>portion of JFK's skull and some of his scalp, with parts of the skull
>>going towards JFK's rear and left and much of the visible blood going
>>towards the grassy knoll as backsplash, and some going to JFK's left
>>rear to hit the motorcycle cops, not so visible because of the
>>limitations of the Zapruder camera.
>>

>A lot of the autopsy materials still exist.  

And a lot of them have disappeared, including JFK's brain.

>Not only did the Warren Commission
>interpret them to indicate a rear entrance wound, 

If you read the autopsy report, you have to have noticed that Humes
said there was a 13cm wound extending from the occipital through the
patietal into the temporal area. The occipital is the back of the
head, and the temporal is just above the ear. 13cm is huge, over 5
inches. That means the autopsy agrees with Kemp Clark, the right rear
corner of JFK's head was blown off. 

The *interpretation* may say one thing, but the description of the
wound is something completely different. 

The autopsy description has never been matched to any of the known
autopsy photos, or the description of the wounds made by the Doctors
and Nurses at Parkland.

At least some of the autopsy photos are fakes!

>in the late 60s Ramsey Clark
>(then Attorney General) appointed a commission of medical people which looked
>at the material and come to the same conclusion.  In the 70s the House Select
>Committee did the same.  In the 80s PBSs NOVA when over the same materials
>again and came to the same conclusion.

The Clark Panel *also* found things the Warren Commission didn't
notice the first time around:

1) They found evidence of a large chunk of metal in the brain photos,
even though by this time the brain had disappeared. 

2) They also found a piece of lead on the outer table of the skull
embedded in the skull. That means if a bullet did hit JFK in the
*back* of the skull, it began to fragment on impact. Only soft-nosed
or dum-dum bullets do that, yet the WC claimed JFK was hit by a fully
jacketed miltary round which would never have fragmented on impact.

>All these people, remember, are looking at detailed photos.

Photos? You mean photos that don't match the detailed descriptions
given by attending surgeons at Parkland, photos that don't match the
description by the attending autopsists? Ha!


>So, do you think they are all part of some conspiracy?  

You love to ignore the physical evidence and keep attacking the idea
of a big *conspiracy* don't you.

It only takes a very *small* conspiracy to replace autopsy photos with
doctored ones so that even people not in on the conspiracy can come to
the wrong conclusions. 

Remember the CIA guy who got caught rifling the HSCA safe where the
autopsy photos were stored?