From: slip-q@access.digex.com (John Q)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.women,alt.rush-limbaugh,soc.men,alt.fan.q
Subject: Re: Support for those who raise children
Date: 22 Jul 92 03:35:58 GMT
Organization: Express Access Public Access UNIX, Greenbelt, Maryland USA

In article <adams.710529269@spssig> adams@spss.com (Steve Adams) writes:
>Prima-facie proof that `Q' is an egalitarian idiot.

Is English your first language, or are you just a fucking dork?

>Sorry, bozo, but your 'rights' are not rights, but a desire to restrict
>others freedom.  Like I said, you'll probably like North Korea or the
>People Republic of China.  That's what society is like when the government
>decides what's best for everyone.

Duh!  I never thought of that.  Thank you SOOOOO much for enlightening us,
you ignoramus.  Of course, the US has absolutely no need to limit
population.  None whatsoever.  Now, go and find a landfill for the NYC
garbage barge.  Perhaps your mouth is big enough.  Yeah.  Definitely.

>Or, perhaps, you would prefer a tyrany of the majority?  Wonderful.  Or
>even better, a tyrany of the minority, who 'know best', like, say, South
>Africa?

What's the matter, Stevie?  Upset cuz you don't "know best"?  You'd
better get used to disappointment.  Chances are, you already ARE used
to disappointment in your puny little life.

>No, it's not enough, and it's not the limit.  But limiting reproduction isn't
>a solution either.  Unless of course we're going to bring on total
>government control.

Are you really so stupid as to believe that the government doesn't
ALREADY have total control?  Yeah, I bet you really are that stupid.
And that is one of the key reasons why you shouldn't reproduce.

>Where is it written that you decide what is a detriment and what is not.
>You have no concept of individual liberty.  Any action that we take as a
>society should be voluntary.  Not at the point of a gun or under the threat
>of imprisonment.  Totalitarianism is bad.  Repeat that a few hundred
>thousand times and maybe you'll remember it.

"Any action that we take as a society should be voluntary".  You certainly
DO live in a dream world, eh Bunky?

>This planet will certainly last quite a bit longer, and either nature will
>correct the problem or mankind will...through progress and technology, and/or
>voluntary action...

Nature takes voluntary action?  You bozoid dweeb.  Nature sure WILL correct
the problem.  It'll wipe mankind off of the planet and start again.  If
that's what you want keep it up.  You shall surely have it.

>Absolutely irrelevent.  There is no benefit to wealth in the political
>arena - you do not get extra votes just because you are wealth.  One more
>proof that you *ARE* an egalitarian idiot.  You think wealth should be a
>factor in determining direction?  You can use your money to purchase
>anything you want, or to fund anything you want.  What you can never, ever
>do is buy my vote....and it counts just as much as yours does.  Don't like
>it?  You're free to move somewhere else...heck, you can aford it, right?

No benefit to wealth in the political arena?  My you certainly ARE a
blithering idiot.  Ever met a homeless person elected to any position?
How did Dan Quayle get HIS job?  Certainly not through brains, you sniveling
fool.

>And finally, I learned long ago, that only an idiot brags about his wealth
>and tries to use it to brow-beat others.  Take a lesson from Andrew
>Carnegie and give it all away...

Well, you ignorant procreational slut, I give away more money per year than
you will probably ever make in your lifetime.  Now what will you snivel
about that?

>You just can't deal with the fact that you can't control my actions, can
>you?  Too bad, isn't it?

Ah, but I can control your actions.  I can force you to post again and
fill the net with nonsense.  Just watch!

Q