HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mabg1084@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Mark Alan Brodie)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: SA Castle Cup
Summary: SA Castle Cup Scores Round 2
Keywords: South Africa Castle Cup Transvaal
Date: 6 Nov 92 17:19:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.BxB1H1.1p
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

I have just received the following report from my source in
South Africa. It's a little late, but contains some useful info:

A summary of last week's Castle Cup games (round two):

WP vs NTvl, Cape Town: WP won by 183 runs:
WP 1st inns: 248 (E. Simons 55*, M. Pringle 43, A. Kuiper 35,
 B. McMillan 34; Simons/Pringle 80 for 10th wicket - new WP CC record;
 F. de Villiers 5/83)
NTvl 1st inns: 133 (M. Rindel 38, M. Haysman 36; M. Pringle 3/36)
WP 2nd inns: 341/5 decl (A. Lamb 206*, A. Kuiper 79; Lamb/Kuiper 267
 for 5th wicket - new WP CC record; F. de Villiers 4/64)
NTvl 2nd inns: 273 (Rindel 79, B. Sommerville 47, Haysman 46; Pringle
 3/44, Rundle 3/83)

Natal vs OFS, Durban: draw
OFS 1st inns: 280 (F. Stephenson 141 off 142 balls; T. Packer 4/58,
 R. Lyle 3/76)
Natal 1st inns: 184 (N. Wright 65, A. Hudson 55; last 7 Natal wkts
 fell for just 40 runs; O. Henry 6/72)
OFS 2nd inns: 321 (M. Arthur 81, H. Cronje 80; Lyle 3/68, R. McGlashan
 3/99)
Natal 2nd inns: 288/8 (Hudson 159* in 7hrs 35 mins; Hudson/McGlashan
 57 for 8th wkt in 60 mins, Hudson/Packer 40* for 9th wicket in 89 mins;
 Henry 2/21 off 46 overs [!! Those figures are a bit difficult to believe;
 perhaps that is a typo - Mark], Stephenson 2/56)

Border vs EP, East London: EP won by an innings and 42 runs
Border 1st inns: 322 (P. Kirsten 158, P. Strydom 45, S. Palframan 36;
 R. Bryson 3/55, B. Schultz 3/84)
EP 1st inns: 514 (M. Rushmere 110, K. Wessels 93, R. Bryson 57, T. Shaw
 55, L. Koen 54, D. Callaghan 50, D. Richardson 42*; R. McCurdy 4/119)
Border 2nd inns: 150 (Strydom 46, Kirsten 29; Shaw 5/49, E. Baptiste
 3/23)

So, after 2 rounds, OFS lead with 8 pts from 2 games, WP & Tvl each
have 6 from 1, Natal and EP both have 6 from 2, and Border & NTvl
have yet to score any points.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: tom@cs.su.oz.au (Thomas James Jones)
Subject: Re: SA World Cup shock
Reply-To: tom@cs.su.oz.au
Organization: Basser Department of Computer Science
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 01:53:47 GMT

In article <6779@news.duke.edu>, shafqat@neuro.duke.edu (Saad Shafqat) writes:
|> In article <1dd1pjINN95@daisy.ee.und.ac.za> fkhan@daisy.ee.und.ac.za (Feroz Khan) writes:

|> >                                   The vote that the Asians have to
|> >draw has to come from Australia as the support of either England or
|> >Australia is needed to win the vote.
|> >
|> 
|> 
|> How utterly nauseating.  One can't imagine why English and/or Australian
|> support should be necessary for a succesful bid.  There's nothing special
|> about them. The empire was finally dissolved in 1980 when the union jack
|> was permanently lowered in Salisbury's Government House and Rhodesia
|> became Zimbabwe.  Read my lips, the party's over. Its time the ICC woke
|> up to the reality of the new dynamic in cricket and in the rest of the
|> world.  
|> 
|> 
|> -- 

	Oh dear, paranoia strikes again.....
	One of the original postings on this subject outlined
	the majority required (6 out of 9 or something), and
	the current positions of various countries as to voting
	b/w the two possible WC locations.
	Maybe if this newsgroup collectively attempted to 
	forget about politics and concentrate on cricket???

	tom

Organization: Freshman, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Date: Thu,  5 Nov 1992 23:55:49 -0500 
From: Abid Aziz <aa2x+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Ball Tampering

Australian cricket coverage on television has got to be the greatest
coverage on Earth.  Dozens of camera angles, even a stump camera; if
these cameras could spot tampering, they already would have in the World
Cup. If Aussie T.V. cameras cannot spot Pakistani bowlers tampering with
the ball, then who can?  Maybe SUPERMAN can with his X-RAY vision!!!

Controversy over Pakistani bowlers doctoring the ball did not start in
the WORLD CUP; this is because Pakistan was unsuccessful until the later
stages.  If Pakistan are losing, not even the Hot-Headed English players
and media raise the question.  It is only when the Pakistani bowlers are
a dominant force that accusations are flared. (Such as in the recent
Pakistan to England Summer Tour (1992))

CONCLUSION: The English are JEALOUS!
            What more do you people want???

ABID AZIZ - CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY - PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: D.I.Patel@lut.ac.uk
Subject: Re: NZ v Zim T2 D3 Tea
Reply-To: D.I.Patel@lut.ac.uk (Lord of the Lords)
Organization: Loughborough University, UK.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 10:17:17 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.095418.1@csc.canterbury.ac.nz> cctr123@csc.canterbury.ac.nz (Alan Murray, CSC Operations, Uni of Canty) writes:
>In article <9211101410.AA23738@cs.utexas.edu>, KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu writes:
>> NZ v Zim T2 D3 Tea
>>      There was only half an hour's play possible because of bad light,
>> electrical storm and rain after lunch. The latest score is 228 for 6.
>
>Rains a lot in Zimbabwe, doesn't it? :-).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Actually, Zimbabwe has had absolutely no rain for a few months now;  it has only 
started raining since they started playing the current test series against NZ.

Its actually been quite a releif for the farmers as they can recover some of
their crop. (Half the Zimbabwe team are farmers!!!!)

>
>Alan

Dip.
From: rakesh@ecr.mu.oz.au (Rakesh DESAI)
Subject: Re: #1
Summary: Windies
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 06:12:58 GMT

In article <1992Nov3.175251.19987@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>, dwight@vixen.uucp (D. Williams) writes:

Stuff Deleted
> 
> Having said all of that I hope the boys from down under get a good whipping
> from our boys.

Just Hope and Pray that Result won't look like 1975-76.  Remember
Australia 5 - West Indies 1.

rakesh
************************************************************************
*   Rakesh Desai, Mech & Manf Eng, Uni of Melbourne, Parkville,Vic 3052*
*   email: rakesh@ecr.mu.oz.au *(BH)+61 3 344 6728  +61 3 328 2258(AH) *
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Subject: NZ v Zim T2 D2 Lunch
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 12:36:32 GMT
Reply-To: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network



NZ v Zim T2 D2  Lunch

     At lunch Zim are 9 for 1 having dismissed New Zealand for 335. NZ lost its
last four wickets this morning for 21 runs. In fact they lost their last seven
wickets for 36 runs. In Zimbabwe's innings Grant Flower was lbw to S'oua for 5.
Arnott and Campbell are batting. For NZ Rutherford scored 72 and was caught by
Andy Flower off Tricos.

K. Sankara Rao                          e-mail ksrao@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu

Department of Electrical Engineering
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105  USA

Phone:  (701)237-7217  (o)
        (701)235-9912  (h)
From: fkhan@daisy.ee.und.ac.za (Feroz Khan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: SA World Cup shock
Date: 6 Nov 92 06:02:27 GMT
Organization: Dept. Elec. Eng., Univ. Natal, Durban, S. Africa
NNTP-Posting-Host: daisy.ee.und.ac.za


Hi there netters,

South Africa and Zimbabwe now hold the crucial votes in deciding where the
1995 World Cup cricket tournament will be played. This is a consequence of
South Africa's decision to withdraw it's application to hold the
tournament. The cut off for the applications is December 1 and it is now a
straight fight between England and the Asian gouping of India, Pakistan and
Sri Lanka. 

At the annual meeting of the ICC in mid year, the voting was tied at 4-4
between South Africa and England with Pakistan voting for England. With the
votes of the associate members also evenly divided, a deadlock was reached
and the ICC gave the candidates until December 1 to submit a new propsal.
After this the Asians entered the race, making a three way duel.

To earn the right to stage the World Cup, an applicant needs six of the
nine full member votes. At the moment England has the support of Australia,
New Zealand and West Indies, other than itself. Pakistan, India and Sri
Lanka will obviously vote for their own application making it 4-3 to
England. To win, England needs the support of both South Africa and
Zimbabwe while the Asians will need to draw at least one vote away from
England while gaining the African votes. The vote that the Asians have to
draw has to come from Australia as the support of either England or
Australia is needed to win the vote.

UCBSA MD Ali Bacher said the management committe had decided at its meeting
last week to withdraw it's application. The reasoning is that South Africa
has enough on its plate in the way of organising international tours and
the administration would not be able to devote itself fully to the
development programme if it had to organise the World Cup as well. He also
said there was a viewpoint that South Africa was moving too quickly with
the amount of international activity and the UCBSA decision was the best
one in the interests of SA cricket.

Dr Bacher emphasised that there had been no horse trading with other
countries involved nor had there been discussions with either the African
National Congress or the National and Olympic Sport Congres. 

"This is purely a UCBSA decision and we will vote on merit when the time
comes (probably in December) to support either England or the Combined
Asian vote.

Source: Natal Mercury, Thursday, 5 November 1992.
-------------
Feroz Khan
Third Year Electrical Engineering
University of Natal
Durban
South Africa
From: fkhan@daisy.ee.und.ac.za (Feroz Khan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: India vs President's XI teams
Date: 6 Nov 1992 12:24:35 +0200
Organization: Dept. Elec. Eng., Univ. Natal, Durban, S. Africa
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: daisy.ee.und.ac.za

Hi there Netters,

India take on the President's XI at Centurion Park today.

The teams are:
India (From) :
Mohammed Azharuddin, Ravi Shastri, Woorkeri Raman, Ajay Jadeja, Sachin
Tendulkar, Pravin Amre, Manoj Prabhakar, Kiran More, Chetan Sharma, Javagi
Srinath, Subroto Banerjee, Venkatapathy Raju.

President's XI
Hansi Cronje (capt), Rudolf Steyn, Terence Lazard, Louise Koen, Mike
Rindel, Errol Stewart, Kenneth Mahuwa, Dave Rundle, Brett Schultz, Tertius
Bosch, Rowan Lyle. 12th man: Pieter Barnard.

The President's XI should provide more opposition to the Indian's since
they are basically the SA Junior team with most of the players in the side
being groomed for the senior side. Hopefully this match should go to the
end of the 4th day, if not providing us with a result then with some
glorious cricket.

The Indians after their glorious batting display against the Bowl XI are a
bit of a quandour due to the inability of their batsmen other other than
the top 4 to spend some time in the middle. Initially it was expected that
Azharuddin and Dev would sit this match out, allowing them to try out
various options but it now seems likely that they will play just so that
they can get used to the South African wickets.

-----------
Feroz Khan
Third Year Electrical Engineering
University of Natal
Durban
South Africa

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: john7552@mach1.wlu.ca (Niall Johnson u)
Subject: Re: Ball Tampering
Organization: Wilfrid Laurier University
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 05:27:13 GMT

For pete's sake can we drop this topic already!

I, for one, am getting thoroughly sick and tired of the petty bickering on
this newsgroup - seriously, it has to be one of the worst (it also tends to
follow race lines in a rather worrying way).

However, I shall NOT be unsubscribing - I know how to 'Kill'!  :-}

Ciao

Niall Johnson,
Dept. of Geography,
Wilfrid Laurier University.
     john7552@mach1.wlu.ca
From: sagrawal@cajal.usc.edu (Sanjay Agrawal)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: IND vs. Pres XI
Date: 7 Nov 1992 08:56:55 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: cajal.usc.edu

Shortly before the end of the second day, the President's XI were 72 for 2
in their second innings. Earlier they dismissed India for 164. President's XI
scored 268 in their first innings.

Sanjay Agrawal
Oracle Corporation
From: A.M.T.Bell@daresbury.ac.uk (A.M.T. Bell,G2,3123,homephone)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: ZIM vs NZ T2 FINAL
Date: 13 Nov 92 13:46:48 GMT
Reply-To: atb@gserv1.dl.ac.uk
Organization: Daresbury Laboratory, UK

In article 4461@julian.uwo.ca, raza@engrg.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed) writes:
> First loss for Zimbabwe, still a good start to test cricket considering that
> they suffered their first loss in third match they played, all the other contries
> lost their very first match(except england).  One must also praise Houghton
                                     ********
> for his brave and sporting declaration of their first inning. From their past record
> and this attitude they will sure develop into a compititive side, if they are not already.
> 
> 
> Can any one tell us the response in Zim towards present serieses(sp?) i.e., crowd
> turnout etc etc.
> -- 
> 
> S.R.Raza.
> raza@surya.engrg.uwo.ca
> 


Sorry Raza, england lost their first test against australia back in 1877,
i think you mean australia.

tony
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: sougata@cc.gatech.edu (Sougata Mukherjea)
Subject: Re: In the defense (was Re: Vinod Kambli
Reply-To: sougata@cc.gatech.edu (Sougata Mukherjea)
Organization: College of Computing
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 22:05:13 GMT

In article <karnik.721513066@atto> karnik@atto.cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik) writes:
>In <1992Nov11.014921.3290@news.acns.nwu.edu> sidi@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Sadiq Yusuf) writes:
>
>>	There are many points that could be made in this article, but since
>>this was discussed specifically in the context of Bombay, I thought I'd
>>give a pure Bombay's POV on it.
>
>	Attaboy Sadiq! Let the bombing begin :-)
>
>
< stuff deleted >

>>	Rather than bias for Bombay players, there is often a bias against
>>them ! This isn't because of any great conspiracy, but simply because of
>>the quota system - there has to be someone from every zone, and not an
>>overwhelming number from any one zone. Why was Kambli dropped from the
>>Australian tour, and then personally called by the Chairman of BCCI ?
>>Because, despite his terrrifc performance in the previous games (Sarjah),
>>there had to be an extra representative from the East (Ganguly). Now,
>>Ganguly is a very talented player, but he was clearly pushed in over his
>>head and far too early in Australia - clearly Kambli ought to have gone in
>>his place. 
>
>	Absolutely! This has happened so often in the past, that when for once
>Gavaskar managed to bully the selectors into taking more than the quota of
>Bombay players along to England, there was a big hue and cry!
>
>
Well, As much as I hate to get into this controversy, I'd like to point out 
the unfair selection has affected all teams - not just Bombay or TN.
A big hue and cry was raised for the 1982 selection to England since it had 
players like Suru Nayak and Ghulam Parkar.
I hope you guys are not justifying their selection????
Let's stop this thread and hope that India don't screw up the first test as usual.

< stuff deleted >
>
>>	Sadiq [ lead soldier - Bombay Bombing Brigade :-) ] Yusuf
>
>	Neeran [another Bombay bomber :-)] Karnik

        Sougata [ just an Indian :-)] Mukherjea
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  Neeran   Karnik  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Dept. of Computer Science,      | Email: karnik@cs.umn.edu
>University of Minnesota         |        karn0001@student.tc.umn.edu
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


==============================================================================	
  Sougata Mukherjea (sougata@cc.gatech.edu)
  Graphics Visualization and Usability Center
  College of Computing
  Georgia Institute of Technology 
=============================================================================
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: operator@cc.curtin.edu.au
Subject: Australian Selection
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 01:17:31 GMT

Hi There,
 
I was wondering what's happening with the selection for the Aussie team to meet
the WI's in the coming Tests.
Just for Aussie cricket sake, with the coming Ashes series not too far away,
shouln't the Australian selection for the Wi's series be focused with the 
appointment of a new captain,which of course means that the dropping of Border
is imminent.I am no critic of Border who has done a wonderful job for Australia
as batsman and captain,just that he is already way past his prime and also that
Australian cricket must look beyond Border,the time is just right.

Cheers!
 























Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4711,,21273)
Subject: Re: Waqar
Reply-To: shamim@bellcore.com
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 23:13:04 GMT

In article 25984@vela.acs.oakland.edu,  mamohamm@vela.acs.oakland.edu (SKEPTICAL) writes:
>	Does anybody out there know for how long has Waqar Younus
>	has played for Surrey?
>	I think he just finished his second season with the county,
>	but I am not so sure.

Correct. he played half a season in '90 (I think Surrey had Sylvester Clarke (?) who left in 
mid-season) and all of '91. 

	--SAN

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: nalin@athena.mit.edu (Palitha Nalin Wikramanayake)
Subject: Please don't pick on Dr. Rao! was Re: PM XI beats WI
Followup-To: rec.sport.cricket
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 23:18:58 GMT

	The subject line says it all!! Here is a man who is doing all he can
	- including updating his finger information 3 times a day so we can
	get instantaneous scores - to give us news and you have to find fault
	with a piddling little slip!!!#@*** Obviously it was because he was
	in a hurry.

	If you can post then please do so. Otherwise just let Dr. Rao get on 
	with the fine job he is doing instead of giving him reason to quit.

	Nalin [3 hearty cheers for KSR] Wikramanayake



In article <BxLy9J.Dsx@news.udel.edu>, corsair@bach.udel.edu (CORSAIR the Pirate) writes:
|> 
|> Here's something you all might find "interesting". 
|> 
|> From CRICKETS@VM1.NoDak.EDU Thu Nov 12 08:02:11 1992
|> 
|> Aus PM XI v WI
|> 
|>      An Australian PM XI beat Australia by 3 runs in Canberra. PM XI scored 233
|> 		             ^^^^^^^^^^^
|> for 7 in 50 overs. Dean Jones scored 76 and Bevin scored scored 58. Ian Bishop
|> took two wickets. In reply WI scored 230 for 9. Reiffel took four wickets while
|> David Williams scored 59.
|> 
|> 
|> My dear KS Rao, I really appreciate what you are doing, but as one other
|> fine newsgroup-reader suggested sometime ago, please proof-read your messages
|> before sending them! 
|> 
|> Gosh, I never knew that Bishop and Williams played for Australia! :-):-)
|> 
|> 
|> Corsair (the "Picky Picky" Pirate)
|> 
|> ********************************************************************************
|> **   ___  ____  ____  ____  ____  ____  ____  **                              **
|> **  /    /   / /___/ /___  /__ /   /   /___/  **  Stay cool.	              **
|> ** /___ /___/ / \_  ___ / /   / __/_  / \_    **  May the Schwartz            **
|> **				              **	     be with you.     **
|> **    e-mail: corsair@chopin.udel.edu         **            _|\ /|_           **
|> **    104 Harter Hall, 837-8509               **            \'o.O'/           **
|> **    University of Delaware                  **            =(___)=           **
|> **    Computer & Information Science          **               U              **
|> ********************************************************************************
|> 
|> -- 
|> 
|> ********************************************************************************
|> **   ___  ____  ____  ____  ____  ____  ____  **                              **
|> **  /    /   / /___/ /___  /__ /   /   /___/  **  Stay cool.	              **
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4711,,21273)
Subject: Re: NZ v Zim - Lack of Play
Reply-To: shamim@bellcore.com
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 03:58:23 GMT


---
	--SAN

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ahmed@ee.tamu.edu (Jubayer Ahmed)
Subject: Re: Don't pick on Dr. Rao
Organization: Texas A&M University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 08:47:12 GMT


I second Nalin's motion. There are not many people on the net who are a   
constant source of information like Dr. KSR. I have been following his 
postings for a long long time. I have a shell command made by Dr. Rao's 
name so that whenever I login it shows me the current status of any ongoing 
game. If you dont understand by the context of the posting what it means 
even if there is some kind of typing error or something, then I doubt if 
you deserve to read rsc. If you don't like his posting, just skip it. Please 
don't flame him. If we just disregard the time which is required to gather 
so much information about a game, just the typing itself consumes appreciable 
amout of time, which is very difficult to afford. A gentleman is showing 
some generosity by doing so and we should be grateful to him for his constant 
feedback. Instead we are picking him for some typo or misspell. Hey, come 
on guys, we are not paying him for this job and therefore, we should'nt 
faulter him for typo or misspell. So please, refrain from flaming a person 
(any person, not only Dr. Rao) if that person is providing us enormous 
amount of information by wasting his own time and effort. A big occasion is 
coming and we need Dr. Rao's postings. So:

PLEASE, DON'T KILL ONE OF OUR BIG SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON R.S.C. 
 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: 
Summary: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: world
Organization: Texas A&M University
Keywords: 

Subject: Re: Please don't pick on Dr. Rao! was Re: PM XI beats WI


I second Nalin's motion. There are not many people on the net who are a   
constant source of information like Dr. KSR. I have been following his 
postings for a long long time. I have a shell command made by Dr. Rao's 
name so that whenever I login it shows me the current status of any ongoing 
game. If you dont understand by the context of the posting what it means 
even if there is some kind of typing error or something, then I doubt if 
you deserve to read rsc. If you don't like his posting, just skip it. Please 
don't flame him. If we just disregard the time which is required to gather 
so much information about a game, just the typing itself consumes appreciable 
amout of time, which is very difficult to afford. A gentleman is showing 
some generosity by doing so and we should be grateful to him for his constant 
feedback. Instead we are picking him for some typo or misspell. Hey, come 
on guys, we are not paying him for this job and therefore, we should'nt 
faulter him for typo or misspell. So please, refrain from flaming a person 
(any person, not only Dr. Rao) if that person is providing us enormous 
amount of information by wasting his own time and effort. A big occasion is 
coming and we need Dr. Rao's postings. So:

PLEASE, DON'T KILL ONE OF OUR BIG SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON R.S.C.
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Zim/NZ T1 D5 Tea score
Date: 5 Nov 1992 08:10:22 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

       Updated: Teas Score

        NZ declared their innings at 222 for 5 after going for quick runs.
Greatbatch was out for 88 in this innings. He missed out a century in both the
innings (he was 87 in the first). Zimbabwe have 73 overs to play and need 329
for a win. The latest score is (possibly lunc) ; 32 for no loss

   The latest score after 43 overs is: 92 for 1. Grant Flower was caught by
Latham off Patel when the total was 92.
 
    Zimbabwe are 110 for 1 at tea. Flower was out for 45, Arnott is on 53 and
Campbell on 9.