HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com (Two days and a wake-up...)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: Globe and Mail pans FWWM
Date: 29 Aug 92 06:58:56 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation

In article <1992Aug29.012305.1@kean.ucs.mun.ca>, rpiercey@kean.ucs.mun.ca writes...

} FWWM was panned in today's _Globe and Mail_ by film critic Jay Scott.
} In a review consisting only of four very short paragraphs, Scott said
} that FWWM is crammed with "nudity, sadism, torture and misogyny of every
} sort, imaginable and not."
[...]
} Scott finished by giving the film a rating of zero. Notably absent from
} his review was any discussion of the acting, dialogue, or plot of FWWM,
} or indeed any thoughtful consideration of Lynch's style. He simply
} called it "disgusting" and "misanthropic" and, refusing to elaborate,
} left it at that.

} I suspect this won't be the last such review of FWWM. Comments?

Just one: Many people said essentially the same thing about Greenaway's
THE COOK, THE THIEF, HIS WIFE & HER LOVER.  And they were wrong.

-- 

	"She's my radiation baby.
	 She's my teenage fallout girl."

--- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC, "The Mill", Maynard, MA)

    boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com
From: rhaller@oregon.uoregon.edu (Rich Haller)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Lynch and Leno
Date: 27 Aug 92 19:39:03 GMT
Followup-To: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Organization: University of Oregon

As advertised, DL appeared on last nights Tonight show.  Not much about
FWWM, though they did show a clip of Leland being nasty to Laura at the
dinner table about her hands being filthy with a chilling reference to dirt
under her fingernail (yes, that one).

Leno gave DL a present, an old drive in movie speaker. DL spoke more about
his as yet unpublished (and very late) book of photographs.  So far he has
two chapters, Dental Hygiene and Sparkplugs. He showed a couple of slides
of something else, namely some ants excavating a small head made of chess
and turkey (that's what he said) covered in clay with holes for the eyes,
mouth and ears.  Building such an object and photographing them at
intervals was DLs response to an invasion of his kitchen by the ants.

No mention of "On the Air", even though he was last on the show to plug it.
Instead, Leno began will resuming a conversation they had about
Philadelphia.

DL appears to have put on some weight.  Cooincidentally, I happened to
overhear him talking to Jack Nance this fall on location in Snoqualmie when
Jack arrived for his first day (they later cut the scenes he appeared in).
Just about the first thing DL asked him was whether he thought he (DL) had
put on some weight. He used the expression 'porked up'.  (I would say that
he has definitely 'porked up' since then, in fact since his last appearance
on the Tonight show.)  Maybe it's that cherry pie.

Jack was walking with a cane and blamed his bum leg on overdoing it on an
excercise bike. His wife (now, unfortunately deceased) had him on an
exercise program.

-Rich Haller
From: cdt@sw.stratus.com (C. D. Tavares)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: Other questions from the TV series.
Date: 3 Sep 92 00:23:11 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.

In article <1992Sep2.042729.19202@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>, drewds@peptide.ecn.purdue.edu (David A Southwood) writes:
> Why did Hank always carry around a domino with 3/3 dots on it??
> He sent a picture of it to Josie and said 'Get my message??'

A lucky fetish, I suppose.  Note that it was NOT always the 3/3 domino.
They misplaced that one during the filming, and switched to another one
at least once, and possibly twice.
-- 

cdt@pdp.sw.stratus.com      --If you believe that I speak for my company,
OR cdt@vos.stratus.com        write today for my special Investors' Packet...
From: cdt@sw.stratus.com (C. D. Tavares)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: Teresa's arm *SPOILERS*
Date: 2 Sep 92 00:09:14 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.

In article <2AA2A53D.19108@ics.uci.edu>, bvickers@valentine.ics.uci.edu (Brett J. Vickers) writes:
> >Or could it be connected to the shaking hands in #2018?  Or BOB's
> >arm reaching out into Glastonberry Grove later that same episode?
> 
> I didn't think about the shaking hand connection.  Does anyone
> remember which hand shook?  Seems like a plausible connection.

Dale's left hand, the pie-eating lady's right hand, Pete's right hand,
BOB's right hand.
-- 

cdt@pdp.sw.stratus.com      --If you believe that I speak for my company,
OR cdt@vos.stratus.com        write today for my special Investors' Packet...
From: C491153@MIZZOU1.MISSOURI.EDU (John Schultz)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: FWWM (Spoilers dead ahead, cap'n!)
Date: 3 Sep 92 01:22:50 GMT

spoilers ahead...









Joe Zitt <zitt!joe@dogface.austin.tx.us> writes:
>Also: I have a vague feeling that "Girl Talk" is the instrumental version of
>James's song from the second season.

Bzzt!  Thank you for playing our game!  ;>  I checked this out last night
after seeing your message, and while the guitar sounds a bit similar in
the two songs, they are not one and the same.  I think you mentioned this
just so I would have to listen to James singing again.  Bleah!

I checked out a few other things as well that people have mentioned on
the newsgroup.  I did not see the blue rose that someone said Gordon
Cole had when he first met Coop.

Also, while finding one of the above-mentioned scenes, I happened to
watch Donna meeting the Tremonds.  One of the things I noticed is that
when Mrs. Tremond takes the lid off the lunch tray and sees the creamed
corn, she has a look that can be described as a mix between surprise and
possibly alarm.  Later on, Donna asks her about if she knew Laura.  Mrs.
Tremond looks away and says no.

John Schultz (caffeine abuser)   !  ABC killed Laura Palmer
c491153@mizzou1.bitnet           !  Macintosh-free and proud of it!
c491153@mizzou1.missouri.edu     !  Subscriber to the hacker ethic
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
From: steve@sep.Stanford.EDU (Steve Cole)
Subject: Re: FWWM: box office news
Organization: Stanford Exploration Project
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 19:54:08 GMT

In article <BtuvL7.60C@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v075q5fr@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey) writes:
|> In article <1992Aug30.221102.11199@morrow.stanford.edu>, steve@sep.Stanford.EDU (Steve Cole) writes...
|> >From one of the clari newsgroups:
|> > 
|> >>	The weekend's other major opening, New Lines' ``Twin Peaks: Fire Walk
|> >>with Me'' failed to generate much heat in eighth place with an estimated
|> >>$1.9 million at 691 screens. The movie brings to the big screen the
|> >>continuing saga of TV's offbeat ``Twin Peaks'' series set in a mythical
|> >>Northwest town.
|> 
|>      Break that down to a per-screen average, please.  Despite what
|>      that .clari newsgroup said, this isn't bad for 700 screens.  
|>      Read VARIETY instead.

Sorry about that. Here are the full stats with a per-screen average
added by me:
			M$	screens	$/screen
Honeymoon in Vegas	7.5	1637	$4581
Unforgiven		5.8	2078	$2791
Pet Sematary 2		5.4	1852	$2915
Single White Female	4.7	1744	$2694
Death Becomes Her	2.7	1810	$1491
Rapid Fire		2.3	1830	$1256
A League of their Own	2.1	1575	$1333
TP:FWWM			1.9	 691	$2749

Not so bad after all, you're right Scott!

$/screen seems a much more relevant figure; in looking over
the article I just didn't notice that TP opened on relatively few
screens. Why is this? Is it because it is a lower-budget film
or because they think it doesn't have the wide appeal to play
in as many places? In any event, it seems a bit unfortunate,
since it insured that TP would not do "well" according to the
popular barometer of $ taken in, which is the stat by which
films are ranked in your average newspaper and, as we have
seen, on clari.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Cole  (steve@sep.stanford.edu, apple!sep!steve)
Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
From: kwest@andromeda.rutgers.edu (Kenneth C West)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: aimless wanderings....spoilers
Date: 2 Sep 92 01:19:51 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.


	Fire, walk with me.........well, I'm about as sure of what's
going on, as far as the big picture goes, as I am of our purpose in life.
Lot's of fun stuff, so here are my thoughts.

	As someone mentioned, the movie, if you ignore the first half and
all of the FBI scenes, could be a terrifying tale of a young woman gone over
the edge. Look at it this way: Laura Palmer, miss young white america, has
been raped repeatedly and otherwise mentally tortured by her father for at 
least six or seven years. It all seemed to start when she was twelve, the very
beginning of her adolescence (sic). She can't handle this betrayal, she snaps
and creates BOB. Daddy didn't do it, BOB did. Whenever daddy gets mean, she
doesn't see Leland. She sees BOB.
	For a while, this works well enough. BOB tortures her, but Daddy is
nice enough, so she goes on with her life, enduring the pain and constructing
a very complicated delusion involving BOB and the lodges to justify her
having to go on with it. To cope, she does what a hell of a lot of kids
do, she gets into sex, drugs, and rock n roll. Numb, comfortably.
	Leland, sicko that he secretly is, has been whoring around with other
young girls, and almost gets caught when Laura is one of the girls he's suppose
to party with. Theresa figures this out and tries to blackmail him, so he
kills her. Bam, first murder. But now he'd unsure whether Laura knew or not,
so he gets careful and at the same time increases his abuse, and this starts
to become too much for her, and her illusion starts to fray as her survival
instinct tries to show her the truth. Finally, she does figure it all out, and
so Leland kills her to save himself.

	Great, a neat little theory. Too bad it's all a crock, since we
DO have the reality of the lodges. That messes things up. Oh well.

OTHER THOUGHTS:

	Blue Rose: 	Well, let's say Gordon does know about the lodges.
			He is older than any of the other FBI guys, right?
			(Seems that way, at least) So, let's say Gordon
			knows about the lodges and maybe BOB and buddies
			living in the red room. So, he starts to hand
			pick like0-minded men and women from the academy,
			because to reveal such knowledge would bring
			scorn and backlash. So, they handle normal cases
			in unusual ways, and keep an eye on the lodge movements
			through the blue rose cases: thus the need for such odd
			codes. They can't let anyone not initiated know
			what they're doing, or their own department will come
			down on them.

	Jeffries:	Bizzare. Assuming my first thought on the rose is
			true, he may not be directly connected to the Palmer/
			Peaks case. Just generally connected to the Lodges,
			which, being one of Gordon's men, he was probably
			investigating. I wish I knew exactly what he
			said.

Well, be seeing you!
:x
From: zitt!joe@dogface.austin.tx.us (Joe Zitt)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: FWWM (SPOILERS), Annie, diner
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 18:02:17 CDT
Organization: Metatron Press / Human Systems Performance Group, Austin, TX

sture@lulea.trab.se (Sture Jonsson) writes:

> -- The 'person' lying in bed with Laura saying "I'm Annie, I've been with Dal
> and Laura...." etc. wasn't Annie, it was Ronette. She looked like the actress
> who plays Ronette (she didn't look like Heather Graham). She had the same
> dress that Ronette had at the 'disco'. Am I right or .... ?

I didn't look quickly enough, but that certainly didn't sound like Annie's
voice to me.


--
"Go to an extreme and then retreat to a more useful position"  --  Brian Eno
Joe Zitt 	       ...cs.utexas.edu!kvue!zitt!joe  	       (512)450-1916
From: sally@anableps.berkeley.edu (S. A. Wilson)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: Other questions from the TV series.
Date: 3 Sep 1992 17:15:16 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: anableps.berkeley.edu

In article <6123@transfer.stratus.com> cdt@sw.stratus.com (C. D. Tavares) writes:
>In article <1992Sep2.042729.19202@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>, drewds@peptide.ecn.purdue.edu (David A Southwood) writes:
>> Why did Hank always carry around a domino with 3/3 dots on it??
>> He sent a picture of it to Josie and said 'Get my message??'
>
>A lucky fetish, I suppose.  Note that it was NOT always the 3/3 domino.
>They misplaced that one during the filming, and switched to another one
>at least once, and possibly twice.


I always liked the net's reasoning behind the changing domino, that the
dots on the domino represented a kill. Unforturnately this was not the
case. Someone had asked Chris Milkey about the domino changing and he
said that someone had taken the original domino.

Sally--


>-- 
>
>cdt@pdp.sw.stratus.com      --If you believe that I speak for my company,
>OR cdt@vos.stratus.com        write today for my special Investors' Packet...


-- 
And I'll see you//And you'll see me          ||    Sally  A.  Wilson
And I'll see you in the branches that blow   ||    Spud   Peel
In the breeze,//I'll see you in the trees    ||    sally@mica.berkeley.edu
Under the sycamore trees       (_Sycamore_Trees_  Lynch/Badalamenti)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
From: gcpahren@eos.ncsu.edu (GREGORY CHARLES PAHREN)
Subject: LiL
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 16:40:55 GMT

In article <1992Sep3.174346.7309@ac.dal.ca> 01sybok@ac.dal.ca writes:
>
>And the Blue Rose was sewn to Lil's dress with... red thread. Do you think
>that's part of Cole' code that Chet and Sam (LOVE those names) missed?
>Mike

  "Her name was Magill, and she called herself Lil, but everyone knew her as
Nancy"    -- The BeatleS
From: pranata@watserv.ucr.edu (Krisanto Pranata)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: How they SHOULD have marketed FWWM.
Date: 1 Sep 92 22:03:14 GMT

In article <15239@umd5.umd.edu> jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog  
here...) writes:
> We all know controversy sells.  Look at the way an overwhelmingly complex,
>
[stuff deleted]
> So...
> 
> If David Lynch and company had wanted a blockbuster, all they needed to do
> was publicize how "Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me" was the story of a
> coke-snorting bisexual whose sexual practices lead to her death.

But the question is do they (okay, New Line Cinema probably would love to have  
a blockbuster) want a blockbuster?

Check out other Lynch films and how they did box-office wise.
I don't think any of them got to be blockbuster, correct me if I'm wrong.

kris

pranata@watserv.ucr.edu
From: ingria@bbn.com (Bob Ingria)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: Primate face near end?
Date: 3 Sep 92 18:23:05 GMT
Reply-To: ingria@BBN.COM
Distribution: world,local
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com
In-reply-to: dagnall@violet.ccit.arizona.edu's message of 3 Sep 92 03:06:00 GMT

In article <2SEP199220064293@violet.ccit.arizona.edu> dagnall@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Robert A. Dagnall) writes:

   Near the end of FWWM, just before we see someone sucking the 
   creamed corn off the spoon, there's a shadowy shot of what looks
   like a monkey's face.  I didn't pay enough attention in my
   physical anthropology classes to identify the species, unfortunately.

   I've seen no discussion of this!  I found it chilling, and I'm not
   sure why - something to do with an impression that the spirits were
   tied in with humans from *way* back, maybe.  What do you make of it? 

Yes, I, too, got the impression it was a monkey (or other primate)
face.  But things were too dark and close-up at that point for me to
make out much more.  (Too bad you can't bring your remote into the
theater and have it work.)  By the way, this adds interesting new
meaning to Ben's comment to Audrey: ``Audrey, you make the rest of us
look like primates.''

-30-
Bob
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
From: rhaller@oregon.uoregon.edu (Rich Haller)
Subject: Re: Jurgen Prochnow is the log lady's husband?
Followup-To: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Organization: University of Oregon
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 23:28:48 GMT

In article <BtwIoK.96n@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v113np2v@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu
(George D Emmons) wrote:
> 
> In article <EecqE0C00UhWI1JAQZ@andrew.cmu.edu>, km46+@andrew.cmu.edu (Ken Miller) writes...
> > 
> >   In the credits, Jurgen Prochnow is listed as Woodsman.  I remember
> >from the series that the Log Lady said, "My husband was a logging man;
> >he met the devil."
> >What does everybody think about Jurgen being the Log Lady's husband?
> > 
> > 
> I posted this on Saturday. I agree wholeheartedly. New thought: 
> Prochnow's woodsman doesn't say anything that we can hear; 
> perhaps he never did, and only a select few (Margaret, for example)
> can hear him.
>          Oh, well...just a thought...
>                                  George...

Very interesting point.  The communication channel is the log.  Can't think
of any other reason to have a woodsman/logger. That's got to be it.

This makes me think of Josie being trapped in the wooden drawer knob, but
only because wood and spirits are involved.

-Rich Haller
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
From: exby@pogo.Colorado.EDU (Doc Exby)
Subject: first FWWM chills
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 05:31:12 GMT


No spoilers here....

I don't know about everyone else - but the first REAL physical
chills (goosebumps and shivers) for me came in FWWM when they showed
the "television" opening scene, Welcome to Twin Peaks  roadsign
and the music.....oohhhh boy.  talk about feeling like an
old friend returned....wow.


 "I want all my garmonbozia"   -LMFAP
.....................................
-=====-                        -=====-
  -=-   exby@pogo.Colorado.EDU   -=-
   -                              -

Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
From: jjc4@po.CWRU.Edu (James J. Campanella)
Subject: more on Gormonbozia (spoilers)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 11:08:50 GMT



{t(-----______________


In article <asdga24aaoiy483@xcf> blojo@xcf.berkeley.edu (Jon Blow) writes:
>> 2.) Do they *need* to cosume the pain and suffering
>>     or do they do it for some other reason?
>
>Perhaps they are addicted to it.

This is a *very* interesting theory.  Remember the extreme close-up at the
end of the mouth sucking up the creamed corn from the spoon?  Consider...

- The spoon was clean and shiny as a mirror afterwards.  We earlier saw
an extreme close-up of Laura snorting cocaine from a mirror.

- The corn was sucked off a spoon.  Earlier we saw Laura snorting cocaine
from a spoon.

I think we're on to something here.
_______________________

I really like that idea. It would explain why the one-armed man was

able to survive without killing and/or conspiring to kill women any

more. He "saw the light" and kicked the habit . . . cool. That also

suggests that the other members of the lodge are not addicted to

Gormonbozia. 

Along the same lines. . . is the dwarf Bob's partner? Boss?

Has anyone ever gotten the impression that the dwarf might be satan?

The dwarf has certainly never done anything to help Cooper out--

like the giant did. Also, the dwarf wears a red suit-- am I reaching,

or what?
-- 
Jim Campanella|"You're a ninja?! Should I call you 'Master'?"
CWRU Bio Dept.|"Hmm, That has a ring to it."
Cleveland,    |"Yeah, and so does a bathtub . . . "
Ohio          |  -Tom Servo, Master Ninja I, MST3K
From: z_morgankm@ccsvax.sfasu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: IGNORING ME???
Date: 2 Sep 92 17:00:37 CST
Organization: Stephen F. Austin State University


In article <58490005@hpscit.sc.hp.com>, bobk@hpscit.sc.hp.com (Bob Kelley) 
writes:

> She may or may not have died.  In the final episode of the TV show, she
> was chained to the bank vault door when Andrew Packard went in and opened
> up his security box, which contained a note from his partner (who had just
> died) laughing about the lack of money inside.  Below the note was a bomb
> that immediately blows up.  The next scene shows the bank windows explode
> outward and one of the character's eyeglasses land across the street.  
> 
> The scene indicates that Audrey's probably gone all to pieces about the 
> bomb.

Hee hee hee.  Gone all to pieces about the bomb!
Well, thanks for the reminder, anyhow!

Still have not seen FWWM.  Do you honestly recommend it?  I've heard such
lousy reviews and would enjoy hearing yours.

K.
From: edrury@3cpu.rain.com (Ed Drury)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Funny Review
Date: 1 Sep 92 09:18:09 GMT
Reply-To: edrury@3cpu.rain.com (Ed Drury)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Garden Lane Software


 I saw the film a little earlier this evening, but I'm still chuckling
over the review in todays' paper. It was the usual bad review, but the
last bit had me rolling on the floor :
 
  "What is a fire walk?  The movie never tells us."

 Is this critic with it or what?

     Ed
-- 
   __
 /--   __/
(___, (_/rury@3cpu.rain.com
From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: ANSWERS!  please respond.
Keywords: FWWM
Date: 4 Sep 92 19:56:26 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <goldberg.715633226@vincent1.iastate.edu> goldberg@iastate.edu (Adam Goldberg) writes:
>What follows in the culmination of re-watching the entire series, seeing FWWM,
>and gathering up the best theories from the net:

>SPOILERS A GO-GO
^L



 
>What happens if BOB does manage to spell out his entire name under
>fingernails?
 
Why, obviously he starts all over again.  "It is happening again,"
remember?

This brings to mind an interesting point.  Teresa's letter was a T... the
LAST in the name.  Laura's was an R, beginning the cycle.  Maddy, the 
next one BOB marked as a victim (by attacking her in #2002), got the O.
Ronnette got a B one episode later.  He's going through the letters in
sequence, it seems.

This would mean that, instead of being the beginning of a cycle, Teresa
Banks was the end of one.  But what exactly was repeating in this
cycle?...
From: C491153@MIZZOU1.MISSOURI.EDU (John Schultz)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: Questions in a world of blue
Date: 3 Sep 92 01:28:52 GMT

spoilers ahead...









Rich Haller <rhaller@oregon.uoregon.edu> writes:
>>       Who lived in the trailer that Agent Chet Desmond found the ring under?
>>        My guess would be the one armed man?
>Nope. It was the Old lady and her grandson. She was called Mrs. Tremond in
>the original, has a different name in FWWM but I forget.

The name in FWWM was Chalfont, I am not sure on the spelling as I did
not pay close attention during the credits...

John Schultz (caffeine abuser)   !  ABC killed Laura Palmer
c491153@mizzou1.bitnet           !  Macintosh-free and proud of it!
c491153@mizzou1.missouri.edu     !  Subscriber to the hacker ethic
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
From: kandall@nsg.sgi.com (Michael Kandall)
Subject: grey hair
Organization: Nihon Silicon Graphics, Japan
Distribution: alt
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 22:09:00 GMT


Why did Leland's hair turn white in the TV series?  I thought it was
because BOB had taken over his mind/body/soul.  Coop said he should
have realized earlier that BOB's grey, greasy hair, and the sudden
change in Leland's hair was related.

In the movie, it seems that BOB had controled Leland from long ago.

Clueless,


Mike
----
From: zitt!joe@dogface.austin.tx.us (Joe Zitt)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: Now we know who Mike is... (SPOILERS)
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 17:15:28 CDT
Organization: Metatron Press / Human Systems Performance Group, Austin, TX

01sybok@ac.dal.ca writes:

> 	So, I guess the Canadian tourism industry is in for a boom after
> that Pink Room scene ;-)

Come to think of it, how far from Canada is Twin Peaks supposed to be? I
thought it was rather far away from it, but characters seem to get to and
from Canada rather quickly.


--
"Go to an extreme and then retreat to a more useful position"  --  Brian Eno
Joe Zitt 	       ...cs.utexas.edu!kvue!zitt!joe  	       (512)450-1916