HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: "Black Power" (was Re: Perot In '96 (Was Re: Test the flame))
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 16:20:47 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b64635.student.cwru.edu

In article <1992Dec15.060447.6843@tdb.uu.se> t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:
>: Having never seen the parts of the tape before the beating, I can only
>: go by what others who have seen it have told me...things like King
>: swearing at the officers, mooning a female cop, etc.  It doesn't
>: justify a beating.  But how do you know how those cops felt?  Imagine
>: you are an officer, and you've stopped someone who is obviously being
>: belligerent.  If you whacked this guy with your nightstick, wouldn't
>: you expect him not to get up if you thought you hit him pretty hard?
>: And, if he did get up, wouldn't you be pretty scared?  I would be.
>: People do some pretty irrational things when they are scared, and race
>: doesn't have to have anything to do with it.
>
>Yes, I imagine the crowd of cops was _really_ scared of King, especially
>after him swearing and even mooning a female cop. I wouldn't have wanted
>to be in their clothes if King had got up after the mutilation. Imagine
>the things he could have done to these fine upholders of the law. Maybe
>he had even sweared at them again, if they hadn't broken his jaw.
>
>Your arguments stink, ms Liz.
>
>/Par
>

	From all that I have read on the subject, and from the full length 
video [ which was shown several times initially on CBS ], I must conclude 
that the police officers broke no laws. They were literally following police 
procedure. Police officers follow a different set of laws than otherwise 
normal citizens. They can ignore many laws while on official business, such 
as traffic laws, and many others. As I am to understand it, there conduct of 
an arrest is spelled out by the Californian government. And, while I have 
not read it in its entirely, I have read certain passages, which do seem to 
allow such behavior. 
	Which leads me to the sad conclusion. They ought to have been 
breaking a law, but they were not. They were not technically guilty of any 
crime. It is the system which is broken. 
	I believe that is why they were found not guilty. The jury had been 
instructed on what constituted breaking their code of conduct rules as a 
police officer. But the public wasn't.
	I hope there is reform on the books.
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: horny countries
Date: 11 Dec 92 22:14:44 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1992Dec11.021944.16879@tdb.uu.se> t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:
>From: t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson)
>Subject: Re: horny countries
>Date: 11 Dec 92 02:19:44 GMT

>Peter Mcnamee (Peter_Mcnamee@kumear.apana.org.au) wrote:
>: In a message dated Tue  8 Dec 92 12:43, Dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (michele D
>: wrote:
>: 
>:  DD> knowledge of the word Horny? All the italians are Horny, that's why 
>:  DD> american and worldwide girls like us! You know, ghost, we don't need
>:  DD> to 
>: 
>: Don't leave out the Horny Australians here...no-one can compete with us!
>: 
>Is there a connection between this and all the sheep you guys keep?

>/Par

Now that one goes to the Swedes ;-)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    !!! H A P P Y   H O L I D A Y S !!!

  - Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
    exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org  <SLOW!>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: cindy@solan10.solan.unit.no (Cynthia Kandolf)
Subject: Re: brits
Organization: /home/ludviga/cindy/.organization
	<1g0dasINN669@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>
	<CINDY.92Dec8231743@solan10.solan.unit.no> <1119@dsbc.icl.co.uk>
Date: 13 Dec 92 19:13:27

Kevin Walsh whines:
>There's nothing more cowardly than flaming some one in some
>poxy foreign language that you have to be from Pluto to understand.

Like its MY fault you're monolingual?

Like its MY fault that, even though i put the name of the city where i
live in my signature, you can't even figure out what language i wrote
there?

Like i was talking to you?

(How do you know it's a flame, anyway, if you can't read it?)

-Cindy Kandolf
 cindy@solan.unit.no
 Trondheim, Norway
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Kevin's fan mail
Date: 12 Dec 92 10:17:12 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <1992Dec10.174249.7571@psg.com> marks@psg.com (Mark Smith) writes:
>andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>> marks@psg.com (Mark Smith) writes:
>>> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>>>> a illiterate
>>>
>>> Dear oh dear.  Looks like a big fat Texas-sized hole
>>> in those shit-kicker boots, Jim-Bob.
>>
>> So I missed the "n" key.  Can you say "typo", spotted-owl-boy?
>
>Can you say "back-pedal"?  You made the same "typo" only a few 
>days before in <BynBrE.2IF@cmptrc.lonestar.org>:
>> a island clump of pond scum.
>
>At least in that article you were just churning out yet more
>pathetically parochial jingoistic drivel, rather than unwisely
>having the audacity to offer your utterly uninteresting little
>opinions on other people's literacy.  In the latter case, it's
>usually good practice to restrain your feverish fingers long
>enough to proofread your own work; that way, you avoid looking
>like both an uneducated simpleton -and- an enormous hypocrite.

Can you say "who gives a shit?"  So, I apparently have a tendency to 
miss the "n" key.  What AN anal retentive asshole you are.  Are
you saving all of my posts?  Or did you just go searching for all of 
them?  How flattering.  How pathetic.  There's a big difference between
this sort of typo and the flagrant misspellings of Walsh and Graley.

Your point about proofreading your own "work" is well taken.  Is this
why it took you days to reply?  Or were you just digging through your
archives, you Kevin-Darcy-James-Keegan-wanna-be?

You know, Marko.  I think I'll keep right on flaming anybody's puncshuatshun,
grammer, or speling I like.  You be sure to alert me to all of my typos or 
misspellings now, you hear?  Make it your mission in life.  At least, then
you will have a purpose, a reason to keep dragging your sorry ass out of 
bed in the morning.

Thank goodness, I have AN owlish little copy editor wasting his time 
proof-reading for me.  Whadda relief!

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: hhelanto@vipunen.hut.fi (Henri R Helanto)
Subject: Re: AMERICAN WANKERS? READ THIS DICKWEED!
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Date: 15 Dec 92 03:00:40 GMT

In <1992Dec13.235805.1@acad.drake.edu> rjr004@acad.drake.edu writes:

>> 	Hey, get real, Finland and Germany were allies in WWII...
>
>Check your history book, I wouldn't exactly say allies, more like:
>
>Germany:  Hey, little shit, yea you, Finland, give me your lunch money or else
>
>Finland:  Ok, just don't rape me

	If that's your point of view, I begin to suspect your level
	of education there. Situation was a bitch, we needed an ally 
	- either Soviet Union (who wants to join up with commies?)
	or Germany. The backbone of Finnish civil war, a group of
	men (who were called 'Jaakarit', 'The Hunters') were trained
	in Germany in 1917 so we already had good relations with them.
	In 1944 Germany was losing the war and UK/USA told us to get
	rid of the German soldiers in Finland so we kicked them
	(or what was left of them) hell out of here and everyone
	was happy. 
	Remember Lithuania? That's what it would be like here if we
	hadn't been _allies_ with Germany. Got the message?



-- 
Henri Helanto - SysOp
hhelanto@vipunen.hut.fi m40176m@puukko.hut.fi
Call MyBBS (+358-0-485067/485068/485968/485918/488139, 24h) !
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mcgrath@cs.uiuc.edu (Robert McGrath)
Subject: Re: Next?
Reply-To: mcgrath@cs.uiuc.edu
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept of Computer Science
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:28:54 GMT

In article <1992Dec18.191858.11836@linus.mitre.org>, m23364@mwunix (James Meritt) writes in part:
|> I did not mention any organism branch except homo.  Your inclusion was
|> irrelevant, and the inclusion covered the question.
I stand corrected.  You were discussing an alleged progression in
the history of homo sapiens.  That claim is, of course, empty, as
noone has any good information about the "consciousness" of any form
of homo except the current one.

|> False. I gave a specific series of "less thans" which, by example, GIVE a progression.
|> I was not asking for, nor did I desire, any of your off-the-wall irrelevancies.

You stated an alleged progression.  That progression makes no sense.  Maybe
my observation of that fact is off the wall, but it is scarcely irellevant.
Why not correct your fallacious progression, rather than blaming me for
pointing out your error.

|> }...which I thought was what you asked.  Or are "THEY" the only one's
|> }qualified to have an opinion.
|> 
|> since you made an absolute statement ("Most of these concepts have no existance")
|> which you don't (by your admission) know, I would say that, within that context,
|> yes they are.  Or at the very least you are not.

I see.  YOU can speculate as wildly as you want about religious concepts, 
but if I disagree then my speculations are ruled out.  Sorry, it
isn't going to happen that way.  Ever.

|> of "insult" I get "to treat with insolence or contempt", and I do see you as worth
|> of contempt.
|> In any event, you have demonstrated that you have nothing along the lines of the
|> given question that you know, so ta-ta.

And you have demonstrated that you have no idea at all of what you
are talking about, how to explain your ideas, or how to be tolerant
of people who disagree with you.  I showed you and your ideas the
respect of framing a careful comment about them.  How come you
are so hostile?  Why is your mind so closed it can't even deal with
a little bit of criticism without resorting to insult?  Maybe
you should try to grow up a little before posting to usenet.

REMcG
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Americans are Screwy
Summary: No, they're not -- it's just those flipped-out Hoosiers.
Organization: Southern, thank "Bob".
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 14:44:53 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.064439.13080@bsu-ucs> 00dclefevre@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>In article <1glg8rINNhk@apollo.ksu.ksu.edu>, cress@apollo.ksu.ksu.edu 
>(Levi Garrett) writes:
>
>well.. I can at least delete in my Usenet reader you ass!

Wow.  What do you do for an encore?

>> Oh great, another advocator of the hippie culture revolution.
>> 
>
>Hardly... just tring to subvert the war mongering culture we live in.  The
>whole nation cried the other night when NBC's live war didn't show up. 
>T2 was one of the most popular films in hisory.  We give our kids GI Joes and
>we are not advocating violence??  Come on

Gee, that one's funny -- for some reason, neither I nor my wife have ever
given her daughter a GI Joe.  (You'd think she'd be interested in the
military types, too, seeing as she turned 17 last month.)  What's also funny
is that when we drive up to see my in-laws up in South Dakota, in that 2100
klicks we see *one* manifestation of this "war-mongering culture" you're
spazzed out about -- Offutt AFB south of Omaha, which used to be SAC
Headquarters back when there was such a thing as SAC.

>> Garrett                                                
>
>Oh no, a person advocating the idiot southern culture (based on the name).

I suppose I'd be advocating Irish culture, then, based on my name -- and by
yours, you're obviously a Frenchman or a Cajun, right?  (At least I've known
a couple of Cajun Lefevres.)

Sheesh.  Are you *sure* you don't actually go to Allegheny College?

>Get a live, weed.
 
Dead ones roll much better.  Does a ridge-runner from Bloody Harlan have to
teach *everything* to you klutzy Hoosiers?  :-)


-- 
Patrick L. Humphrey  (patrick@is.rice.edu)  Rice Networking & Computing Systems
     +1 713 528-3626 at Rice. 776-1541 at home. 667-6554 at Palace Lanes. 
 
 This space for rent, cheap.  Call +1 606 848-3950 for a deal you can't refuse.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson)
Subject: Re: Americans are Screwy
Organization: Dept. of Scientific Computing, Uppsala Univ.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 01:03:09 GMT

Sanin Perdomo (sperdomo@samson.hac.com) wrote:
: 
: > ET YOU DIE
: 
: Should read; I'D LET YOU DIE
: 
: -COSMIC

Should read; -PATHETIC

/Par
From: dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (Michele Dall'Agata)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: French girls, the best...NO WAY
Date: 17 Dec 92 10:38:41 -0600
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <1992Dec16.132537.27159@physchem.ox.ac.uk>, mark@physchem.ox.ac.uk (Mark) writes:
> 
> A small bit by Michele:-
>> 
>> I know, your american woman need to have a shave. Well, French and Italian 
>> women use depilatory cream. Just for the legs, you know...
>   
> 
> Fucking crap.  If they do use some sort of cream it doesnt fucking work...
>      they are still good for a shafting though!!!
> 
Probably that happened with the girls that *you* had....

	Michele
> 
> -- 
> Mark
From: dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (Michele Dall'Agata)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Michelle gets fired.
Date: 20 Dec 92 17:57:31 -0600
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

It is sunday, I have time, I can answer to your "posts", little-ugly-moron.

In article <1180@dsbc.icl.co.uk>, kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
> In article <1992Dec13.164639.1@fnala.fnal.gov> dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (Michele Dall'Agata) writes:
>> 
>> I do not give a shit. Not anymore.
>> 
> Why is that, Michelle?  Is it because you just got the sack and are
> "working" out your notice period.

Nope, I understood that, since even the morons like you can post here without 
problems, there are no reasons to be worry about to post in alt.flame.

> 
> If you'd done a better job of cleaning the toilets and washed the shit
> out of your hair every now and again, naybe you would still have a job.

Do you know kevin, what your problem is? That a flame hurts when it speak 
about reality. And you just write bullshit. I do not clean toilets [fact, 
you can check if you want], and so to answer to your *lame*, is only boring.
> 
> Ah well, I suppose you could always get a job working as a delivery
> girl for Pizza Hut; that's if you can deliver it all without being
> tempted to take a bite.

Pizza hut is for British and Americans. We, Italians, do not deal with 
plastic pizza. We cook and eat only real food.

	Michele
> 
> -- 
>    _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
>   _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
>  _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
> _/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
-- 

===========================================================================
I wish to everybody a real BAD Christmas. I hope that your fathers will die
doing the role of Santa Claus that come down from the chimney. I wish that
your planes blow out while you are going back home to meet your families.
Have a Christmas Drink and Drive accident, get as many DUI as you can.
And, Last but not Least, FUCK YOURSELF, again.
===========================================================================

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rjr004@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: JORN the Beatmaster
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 20:05:48 GMT

In article <CINDY.92Dec13194229@solan10.solan.unit.no>, cindy@solan10.solan.unit.no (Cynthia Kandolf) writes:
> Someone who calls himself "The Phantom" (what IS it with the comic
> book shit?) shows his lack of understanding about the Gulf War:
>> So did Norway committ [sic] troops? No.
> 
> Why should we?  We have more than enough oil.

  Gee, a little thing called supporting international law is one reason. 
Another is the fact that the U.N. voted with magnanimous resolve to not
allow such a violation occur.  Norway is a member of the U.N., and should
support its resolutions in proportion to its size.  The Norwiegan Ambassador 
did vote for the U.N. resolutions against Iraq and for the Liberation of 
Kuwait.  Maybe if Iraq nukes Norway the rest of the world should just say,
"why should we help, we have more than enough blondes"...> 

> -Cindy Kandolf
>  cindy@solan.unit.no
>  Trondheim, Norway

---The Doctor
rjr004@drake.acad.edu


"Reality-ometer:  [\.........]  Hmmmph!  Thought so..."

> 
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper)
Subject: Pope up a rope?
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 13:50:06 GMT

Begin included article (36758):
----------
In article <1992Dec11.195009.6856@Princeton.EDU>,
datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
> In an earlier post, Michele wrote:
> 
> The church in Italy and in all Europe, had (and has) a big fucking 
> power.
> 
>       Silly me. And I thought the Pope frowned on that type of thing.
> 
> Tep--"But can you still use whipped cream?"

Such a trivial, ignorant, stupid, moron! What the fuck are you saying?
That the fucking catholic church has no power?!? <hysterical rant
deleted because, quite frankly, I was getting bored>

        Michele
---------

	I'm sorry if my post was too hard for you, Michele. I've tried
to cultivate a dry earthy wit that's too subtle for the likes of you.
Let's try it again.
	You said "...blah blah blah had (and has) a big fucking power."
Now, being opposed to the Church's stand on abortion, contraception,
masturbation, etc., I came up with the riposte

    Silly me. And I thought the Pope frowned on that type of thing.

	which was a play on your use of "fucking power." Get it? I would
have thought my reference to whipped cream would tip you off, but I
guess not. Now that's what I really can't stand on alt.flame. Not lame
attempts at flamage, not repetitive posts, but people who have no
capacity to appreciate and cultivate a sense of humor. Now get with the
program, pisano!

Tep--need I say more?
-- 
Did you really think I spoke for anyone else? Boy, you're gullible!
From: 00dclefevre@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Americans are Screwy
Date: 16 Dec 92 17:52:16 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1992Dec16.132027.9646@ericsson.se>, etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim) writes:
>>
>>Go become high school English teachers, idiots!             
> 
> 
> OoooOOOOooh!!  Temper temper, little child.  

So, you are a fucking pig.  Well, you don't know my age, and even if you did,
age has nothing to do with wisdom or smarts.  Your posts prove that. 
 
> Seems like someone can't take the
> heat of alt.flame.  

Screw that.. I am the one that is going to keep on posting even though I
admittedly have a god damn spelling problem.  YOU'RE the ass that keeps on
looking at spelling other than content and missing the whole fucking point, not
me.
> Maybe *you* should get out of this group, you illiterate
> prick!  If you don't like spelling flames, make sure it's right *before* you
> post it.  Who's the idiot?                                        

Did you read the same god damn note I posted.. I said I was going to.  I have
to when the only way to get my point accross is get the spelling perfect since
your god damn education taught you nothing about 
> You're the one who can't spell.  Anyway< who said I      
> was american?  

If your education taught you all mechanics and not content then is is SHIT no
matter where you got it.

Being american isn't necessary to see that you've got a void

> inside your skull, you daft cunt.
>                       
> Get the fuck out, you ignorant wanker.  

Well, I am going to stay around now just to annoy the fuck out of you forever
more!

Take your "orginal" posts and stick them

> up your distended anus, you pointless organism.
>    
> Cheerio molecule-mind,
> Jim.

Better than fart-brain old-ass bullshit head.. as you appear to be.

> 
> 
> 
> PS. Don't you just *love* it when the small-fry rise to the bait??  That's what
>     alt.flame is all about.

Fuck you and your mother (I know you enjoy it).  For you, age has apparently
only brought on stupidity..
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN)
Subject: The Last Of The Loyalists
Organization: Ostfold College
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 00:23:24 GMT

In article <1179@dsbc.icl.co.uk> kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
>In article <exuptr.401.0@exu.ericsson.se> exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor) writes:
>> In article <1139@dsbc.icl.co.uk> kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
>> >
>> >Looks like you are going to have to think of somthing new to
>> >moan about.  Unless you get a hard-on seeing posts degrading
>> >your island.
>> >
>> Look who's talking about islands.
>>
>> Patrick Taylor
>>
>What a cracking followup by the Volvo driver.  Looks like some one
>gave you a clue for Christmas but forgot that the batteries were
>not included.  You realy shouldn't have unwraped that clue until
>Christmas day anyway.  I do understand how much you need it though.
>

Kevin'o'lute is a die hard Empire Loyalist, as we all can see !!!

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: Re: Americans are Screwy
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:32:37 GMT

jmkerrig@vela.acs.oakland.edu (KERRIGAN JOHN M) writes:

[Stuff deleted]
>>Yes, you are an American citizen; probably one who would want to do away with the military.  Let's assume this happens, and the U.S. is attacked because of its vulnerability.  You're fudgepacking with your boyfriend, while badmouthing the military, and all of a sudden, a Canadian busts down your door about to kill you.  Now you start wishing the military had never been destroyed.  You start whimpering, "If only our boys (the military) can come and save my homosexual ass!!!!"  NO WAY CUNT, YOUR DEAD.
[Stuff deleted]

Oh yes!!!  We Canadians are so vicious.  We are right now, behind closed 
doors planning an invasion of the United States.  We are planning to hit
Washington, D.C. first, that's where all the idiots are.  And we're going
to burn down the white house just like we did before.  And one things for
sure, when we set out to take over a country, we'll do it all the way, 
unlike you yanks who couldn't even beat a country 1/10th your size in    
1812.  

I think you better worry about getting shot for cutting someone off on the
freeway first, buddy-boy.  Who is a bigger threat to the average American
citizen.  Remember a seventy year old Sweede is fitter than a thirty year
old Canadian.

Get your head out of the dark ages and take a dose of reality, yank.

Katherine Merle Mason
Ne Oublie....

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Gun toting american fools
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 20:23:27 GMT

In article <1992Dec11.225418.5485@vlsi.polymtl.ca>, d40937@aiken (Jean Yves Desbiens) writes:

> The Phantom strikes again putting his big fat foot in his deformed
> mouth, so because I speak french, I am French.      

Ok, have it your way. Either you emulate the French, or your French-Canadian.
Take your pick. However you choose, you still have the intelligence of a
Frenchman.

--The Phantom