HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: donnell@morayeel.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: The worst movie of all time...
Date: 5 Oct 92 14:09:34 GMT
Organization: none

In article <1992Oct4.205031.28599@athena.mit.edu> ranald@athena.mit.edu (Gregory L Yantz) writes:
>No no no no no. Truly the worst movie of all time has to be _Chesty
>Anderson in the U.S. Navy_. Truly. This summer I got into the habit
>of renting bad movies, particularly horror jobs,and I saw some real stinkers,
>but this is the only movie that was ever SO bad that I had to leave the room.
>
>Greg

Might I recommend a couple of similar gems for your perusal:

Deadly Weapns
Secret Agent 73.

Both were made by Doris Wishman <New York auteur, maker of "A NIght To         
Dismember, The Amazing Transplant, Bad Girls Go To Hell" and many others>
and star Chesty Morgan. Since these are sexploitation, Chesty has to have a
reason to take her top off, to show her amazingly large breasts. Perhaps
she will kill someone with her breasts, or have a camera implanted in
one of them. Terrible stuff. I recommend both films.

					--Judex--
Xref: sparky alt.cult-movies:8419 alt.cyberpunk:4495 rec.arts.sf.movies:7514
From: jis@panix.com (Jack Szwergold)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies,alt.cyberpunk,rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: bladerunner script
Date: 28 Sep 92 04:12:48 GMT
Organization: Panix, NYC

In <Bv9JM5.J5D@news.cso.uiuc.edu> g-martin1@uiuc.edu (Gregory A. Martin) writes:

>You seem to have missed the point -- posting such large files to a group
>wreaks havok on some systems, especially those with limited file space.
>I tried and took the heat for doing so. That's why an ftp site is the
>best way to go.

How about putting up a request for mailing of the script.  That way, only
those people who really want it will get it (by e-mail).

Jack
jis@panix.com
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 19:35:23 EDT
From: Sime <TJS107@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: The Stuff

I saw this movie once awhile ago, don't remember it too well, except for the
fact that it was REALLY cheesy.  Funny though.

The kid in the movie eats shaving cream at one point to satisfy his 'hypnotized
' parents who are controlled to think that the Stuff is the greatest thing
since sliced bread.  Then he pukes.  Great scene.  I forget how they wipe the
Stuff out, though, since it sorta is just, well, stuff, until you eat it then
takes over your body and you become living stuff or something like that.

Strange flick.

Sime                                                  Go Pirates!
                                                      Go Steelers!
The poison of love so pure it's deceiving,            Go Pens!
And deceit is all we have it's got to be over
   -Queensryche
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: donnell@shamu.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Subject: Re: Circuitry Man & Biggles
Organization: none
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 08:03:43 GMT

In article <1992Sep29.195724.1793@bnr.ca> labiche@crchh561.BNR.CA (Maurice LaBiche) writes:
>Circuitry Man - looked interesting to me and I rented it.
>There were some interesting ideas in it but the execution
>lacked interesting special effects.  I would never watch it
>again it just seemed to be a cheesy film with cheesy effects 
>and cheesy acting.  Of course if your into cheesy it may not
>be cheesy enough.  A definite middle-of-the-yawn-road film.
>View it at your own risk.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Maurice LaBiche (Mo.L.)         |   labiche@bnr.ca
>Bell Northern Research          |   Part of Northern Telecom 
>Richardson, Texas               |   i'm really in Texas
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

Oh. I was unaware that Science Fiction films had to depend on "interesting
special effects" for their entire appeal. And if a film lacks them, it is
cheesy? Keep your effects, I'll take a "cheesy" film with a couple of
good IDEAS anyday. Haven't seen anybody doing anything all that interesting
lately anyway, so I guess I just liked this one. No real reason, other than
it held my interest and had some good characters. Effects are merely eye
candy; without ideas to provide a context, they quickly grow boring.
(i.e. George Lucas's entire output since THX1138)
<All IMHO, of course>

				--Judex--
From: donnell@mantaray.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: OK.....Hold it!
Date: 3 Oct 92 15:22:48 GMT
Organization: none

In article <1992Oct2.134830.14524@bohemia.metronet.org> bill@bohemia.metronet.org (Bill Dixon) writes:
>gunnarh@dhhalden.no (GUNNAR HORRIGMO) writes:
>
>
>>I've heard a lot of talk here about "MST3K". What the hell is it? I even 
>>think I spotted an alt.fan.mst3k here.
>
>[.sig deleted]
>
>	Just learned this onr myself, from actually seeing the show for the first time.
>	"MST3K" is "Mystery Science Theatre 3000", generally found somewhere on your cable box.
>	Each episode is an old SF epic, usually of dubious merit which is used as backdrop
>	for Joel Hodgson and two robot-like puppets. Joel and Co. are seen as shadows in chairs in 
>	in front of the film, and heckle/rip the film for it's duration. The humor is actually 
>	fairly good and at a fairly widespread level. Running jokes can be hilarious (sometimes).
>
>
>
>				Joe Bob says "check it out"
>					-bill

Unfortunately for Gunnar, they don't carry it in Norway. Too bad, really,
because it is a fine show. But I suspect that some of the humor may be
too "American" for an international audience....

					--Judex--
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: Lars Gaustad <larsg@benoni.nbr.no>
Subject: Re: Lexichrome
X-Xxdate: Tue, 29 Sep 92 09:55:00 GMT
Organization: Medialaboratory, National Library, Norway
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d7
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 06:50:57 GMT

Lexichrome
could anybody please provide mw with information on Lexichrome, the
company or the technique, the newborn baby of Technicolor. Reply by
e-mail, please.
From: k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (ce)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Darkman
Date: 6 Oct 92 06:50:50 GMT
Organization: Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum GmbH, Hamburg

In article <1apt28INNsic@agate.berkeley.edu> peterme@ocf.berkeley.edu (Peter Merholz) writes:
>In article <gunnarh.181.718296035@dhhalden.no> gunnarh@dhhalden.no (GUNNAR HORRIGMO) writes:
>>I just saw Darkman. I thought it was great, a friend of mine hated it and 
>>told me to pst on the subject here to see what you think of it. And so I did.
>>The thread is yours.
>
>Well, I guess it was stupid fun, though I can't say I really liked it. In
>terms of reality check there were a few problems: How do you survive an
>explosion that throws you hundreds of yards? How can you make bilabial
>sounds with no lips? And, worst of all, how did the woman latch on to the
>bar with the handcuffs after she's falling, unless the bar passed through
>her body without hitting any molecules, only to be stopped by the more solid
>metal??
>
Or how did she manage to avoid ripping her arms out at the sockets by the
sudden deceleration? Same problem in Batman when Bats and Vicki are falling
off of Gotham Cathedral. But hey, if I let Physics get in the way, i'd never
see *any* SF/Fantasy movies (except 2001)!


*******************************************************************************
*  "Supernatural, perhaps...Baloney, perhaps not" - Bela Lugosi               *
*******************************************************************************
Matt Marchese	    The opinions expressed here are not those of my employer, *
Cray Research  	    my wife, my church, or myself...But they are the opinions *
DKRZ                of Elvis as revealved to me through the medium of my pet  *
Hamburg, Germany    hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...                             *
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: cgc2646@usl.edu (Cech Claude G)
Subject: Bob Roberts and George Romero
Organization: University of Southwestern Louisiana
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 23:35:03 GMT

Hmmmmmm.  Just got back from seeing _Bob Roberts_.  There are some
obvious allusions to other films (_Nashville_ most strongly), but
one possible allusion appears to involve Romero.  In an early scene,
we see Roberts fencing on a hill slope.  The physical location
immediately struck me as being reminiscent of (if not identical to)
one in NOTLD.  Then we find out that Roberts is campaigning in PA,
which fits with the locale and _maybe_ explains that jolt of
familiarity.  But...[not to give out any spoilers] then we get the
video that first airs on election day.  Anyone else struck by this
possible homage to Romero?

Cheers -
		Claude

Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: wildman@athena.mit.edu (Timothy Worsley)
Subject: Re: Circuitry Man & Biggles
Reply-To: eprice@sql.sybase.com
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 23:03:19 GMT

In article <1992Sep29.181233.22410@news2.cis.umn.edu>
donnell@barnacle.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous) writes:

>In article <1992Sep29.133721.20772@bmerh85.bnr.ca> shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally) writes:
>>
>>I saw this movie at my local rental store. Sounds interesting.
>>Is it any good ? Also, does anyone know about a movie called
>>_Biggles_ ? Some guy in  a helicopter going back to World War I
>>to help (similarity in plot to The Final Countdown). Any comments,
>>ie. is it worth renting, would be appreciated !
>
>Never heard of Biggles, but I liked "Circuitry Man" quite a bit.

Well, Judex, you beat me to it -- I have never heard of "Biggles", and
I also liked "Circuitry Man"!

I rented it for no particular reason, and was pleasantly surprised.  I
would not flame anyone for saying it was cheesy, goofy, unoriginal,
etc. because that's not entirely inaccurate.  *But*, I enjoyed it, and
felt it was a lot better than most of the sci-fi flicks I've rented
blind on similar whims.

>(PS- I thought this was much better and more marketable than "Hardware", but
>it was never released to theaters. Pity.)

I wondered about that.  It is too bad.  (I didn't think "Hardware" was
quite as bad as many people seem to, but I agree, it would have been
cooler to have seen "Circuitry Man" in the theater...)

While I'm here, I would like to complain that out of 15 movies I
wanted to find on video, I called three or four mail-order video
places (eg Facets, Dickens) and only found *one* of them -- one of the
easiest ones -- and it cost $59.95!!  FUCK!!!

-Ed (not Tim), eprice@sql.sybase.com (not wildman@...)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: cgc2646@usl.edu (Cech Claude G)
Subject: Re: The Lost Boys
Organization: University of Southwestern Louisiana
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 01:00:18 GMT

In article <gunnarh.147.717616065@dhhalden.no> gunnarh@dhhalden.no (GUNNAR HORRIGMO) writes:
>In article <Bv1n5u.2L1@acsu.buffalo.edu> v124jw4y@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Benjamin R Pierce) writes:
>>From: v124jw4y@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Benjamin R Pierce)
>>Subject: Re: The Lost Boys
>>Date: 23 Sep 92 18:25:00 GMT
>>In article <1992Sep23.151139.8066@cs.nott.ac.uk>, nlc@vulcan.xtel.co.uk (Neil Cook) writes...
>>>Having just seen the Lost Boys on video, I have ten ways to
>>>recognise a vampire:
>>> 
>>>8) Never enter a house through the door, when crashing through a window
>>>   is more impressive
>>
>>..this is due to a loophole in the "Vampires can't enter your house unless
>>you invite them" rule.  Only doors are technically covered. :)
>
>Wrong. They *can* enter a house anyway they want. But, If thei are invited, 
>through the door or whatever, they will fail vampire tests. Like crosses and 
>garlick and stuff.
>
>
>          /\           | I didn't say this.      | "I never forget a
>        /    \         | My supervisor would     | face. Especially
>      /        \       | kill me if i did.       | when I've sat
>    /    (<>)    \     |_________________________| on it."
>  /                \   |Gunnar Horrigmo          | -Kathleen Turner
>/____________________\ |gunnarh@sofus.dhhalden.no| Crimes of passion

No, actually not.  At least in some of the Slavic myths on vampires, they
_have_ to be invited into a home.  On the other hand (I don't have my
reference books with me at the moment, so I can't give you details!), I
do seem to remember that a vampire generally knocks once.  If you don't
answer that first knock, you should be OK.  Of course, if you live in
a large apartment...

Cheers -
		Claude
From: 01fortec@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Deckard as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Date: 30 Sep 92 18:57:37 -0300
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

After seeing all this stuff about replicants and Deckard and such,
I thought it appropriate that I post my 2 cents worth.

A lot has been written pro and con about D being a replicant, the
6th one who escaped. All right, I may have this wrong but replicants
are NOT androids a la Bishop of Aliens. They are genetically 
engineered biological creatures, of human stock, tailored to their
specific tasks, with some side-effects. Consider that the abilities
exhibited by the replicants could also be explained if they were
engineered for a more efficient and selective use of adreneline and
their external sensory capacity was diminished as a result of a 
more durable and resilient skin. Another side effect is the 
shortened lifespan, since the human animal is still not designed to
run in high gear for unlimited amounts of time despite engineering.

Deckard could be a replicant of the same series as Rachel. Lower and
less controllable amounts of adreneline, a near-human level of activity
and normal-type skin generation might result in a longer-lived, almost
human replicant.  Other physical modifications might also have been
involved in the others. Except for Pris, I think all the others served
in one military capacity or another. Certainly Roy served on starships,
and in combat. Consider also that a thicker, more durable skin would
increase your chances in the event of decompression, possibly giving
you time to suit up or duck into an airlock or escape vehicle.

Joseph Chiasson
01fortec@ac.dal.ca


Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: labiche@crchh561.BNR.CA (Maurice LaBiche)
Subject: Re: Winnie the Pooh as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Keywords: Huh?
Reply-To: labiche@crchh561.BNR.CA (Maurice LaBiche)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Distribution: alt.cult-movies, rec.arts.movies
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1992 21:49:29 GMT

Wait!  I always thought it was tigger!  You mean, gasp, it was
Winnie the Pooh.  Oh, may gaawd!

--------------------------------------
Maurice LaBiche   |   labiche@bnr.ca 
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: sboiarsk@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Sean L Boiarski)
Subject: Re: Highway to Hell
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 05:18:44 GMT

In article <BvF195.5v2@news.cso.uiuc.edu> daf31428@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (David A. F
leming) writes:
>    A rented a video called _Highway to Hell_ from Blockbuster a couple
>of weeks back on a whim -- turned out to be really good.  Typical plot --
>boy elopes with girl (Kristy Swanson, late of _Buffy_), girl gets kidnapped
>by a traffic cop from Hell (literally), boy goes to Hell to get her back,
>and so on.

-Stuff Cut-

>    The thing's another direct-to-video bit, I guess -- I don't remember
>ever hearing of this playing in theaters.  Common practice, nowadays, I
>guess.
>    Anyway, it's worth renting, IMHO.
>

This was released in theatres, at least here in Columbus, Ohio. I didn't get a
chance to see it, but it was playing at the Drexel, our local art film house. I
heard that it was extremely good though, and I'm glad to hear its out on video,
now I should get a chance to see it. We had originally planned to take
several, very christian girls to see the movie, but they got wind of the title
and that shot our plans down.

>              Dave Fleming
>              daf31428@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
>
>Gottfried as Adolf Hitler


Sean
From: andrewg@yang.earlham.edu
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: More Re: O. C. and Stiggs
Date: 4 Oct 92 22:01:58 GMT
Organization: Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana



Hi there;
Just wanted to add my two cents to this whole discussion; I'm a great fan 
of O. C. and Stiggs; I have been since I read the original story in a 
"Best of Nat'l Lampoon" volume which was published some time last year.  
	Reading that story made me laugh so hard I cried and had to stop.  
I've tried to read it aloud to others and haven't been able to get through 
the first paragraph without bursting into laughter.  It's one of the 
best-written humor stories I've ever read, and I would encourage everyone 
who feels like they have a sense of humor to go read it.  If you don't 
feel like shelling out the $ for the book, just read it in the bookstore 
and let people watch you crumple into a puddle.
	It's a funny story; its only flaw is that it the middle is a bit 
too long, but the end makes up for it.  If anyone out there has info on 
how to find the film, please reply.

					Go find it,
					thank me later,
						Andrew.
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: donnell@polyp.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Subject: Re: Rare Movie: TOUCH OF SATAN : Commander USA
Organization: none
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 15:10:48 GMT

In article <168708B98.PETERC@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu> PETERC@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (Peter Correnty) writes:
>I was rummaging through my video collection and I stumbled upon a
>very obscure film that I completely forgot about called TOUCH OF
>SATAN (aka A TOUCH OF MELISSA).  I couldn't figure out where I
>found such a bizarre (and probably forgotten) film until I saw, at
>the end of the film, Commander USA and Lefty ripping it apart -
>Elvira-style.  The movie is actually excellent ... there's some
>nasty meathook murders filmed almost cinema-verite style to give
>them an authentic feel, lots of bad 70s dialogue, and an awesome
>transformation scene with Satan in voice-over at the end.
> 
>Has anyone seen this film, and does anyone remember Commander USA
>and Lefty?  They (He) used to air weird horror movies on the USA
>station on Saturday mornings.  As a gag, some people at work
>subscribed me to his fan club back in 1985.  I got a postcard from
>Commander, a glossy of him and Lefty, and a letter written and
>signed (a handprint) by Lefty.  Shortly thereafter, he was cancelled,
>and I haven't seen him since (except out of costume in commercials).
> 
>-Pete.

I remember the Commander and Lefty! I thought he was great. Not as good as
say, Seymour <semilegendary 70's horror movie host in California> but better
than most. I will never forget the day he went on vacation to Aruba, and 
they showed him on his normal set with brown cloth covering everything. 
Hokey, but humorous. Didn't he draw Lefty's face with cigar ash on his
RIGHT hand? Ah, another lost classic!

					--Judex--
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 18:07:30 EDT
From: <JMC159@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: The Stuff

Has anyone out there ever seen a movie called "The Stuff"?  It is about a white
yogurt like dessert which controls your mind and eats at you from the inside
out.  Also there is this little boy and this man who know the power this Stuff
has and they try to get it off the market.  It is a very corny horror flick (If
you can even call it horror).  I just want to know if I am the only one out
here who has seen it and if not what does anyone else think of it.

Jill
From: mwojcik@pennsas.upenn.edu (Michael Wojcik)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Chocolate Nazi-cles -name this one
Date: 30 Sep 92 17:01:34 GMT
Followup-To: alt.cult-movies
Organization: the University of Pennsylvania


 k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (ce) wrote:
> 
> Perhaps in dis/honor of the recent surge of Neo-Nazi related activities
> here in Germany, i'm in the process of putting together a list of cult-
> fave films dealing with the resurrection of Nazis post-WWII. 
>     <stuff deleted>
> I know there's others. Anyone care to contribute?

I saw parts of this cool movie on a Saturday afternoon recently, but I
didn't catch the title. It was kind of a living dead with nazis. Early on
this girl was swimming in this lake that was mostly overgrown with lillies.
As she swam, there were camera cuts to the lake bottom, and there were
these ratty looking nazis walk/swimming around, converging on her.

Later on, these guys came out of the lake (they were blue!!) and attacked
this town. As they cought people, they went for necks, dracula style (for
the blood I guess). Still later, the townsfolk hit upon the idea to burn
the baddies. In one scene, there are about 8 or 9 of these guys sharing
(more like fighting over) a bucket of blood (great!). Some guy busts in
with a flamethrower or something and toasts them!

Anyway, I was going in and out all afternoon, and my wife was yelling at me
for watching such garbage, so I missed the title. It looked to be a late
70's production, though I could be wrong. There's something wonderful about
a ratty, blue nazi on fire walking down a quiet village lane.

What was the Title!!!!????? Anybody!!???

                    ___             
                   /|||\               
       ___....-----'---`-----....___              So cool I stole it!
=========================================    
        ___`---..._______...---'___           
       (_*_)      _|_|_|_      (_*_)      
         \\____.-'_.---._`-.____//       
          `~~~~`.__`---'__.'~~~~`         
                   ------                
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: scarrobi@shearson.com (Steve Carrobis)
Subject: Re: The Stuff
Reply-To: scarrobi@shearson.com
Organization: Lehman Brothers, Inc.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 18:32:23 GMT

yes i saw it ...
 one of the stars is Garret Morris...
i even taped it ..
its more of a spoof of the food of the gods meets the blob ...

i thought it was o.k. 


  Steve C.

Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
id <m0mZSey-0000j2C@crash.cts.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 92 14: 29 PDT
	id <is51186@pro-amber.cts.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 92 14: 13 PDT
From: rsopicki@pro-amber.cts.com (Randy Sopicki)
Subject: Re: bladerunner script
Organization: ProLine [pro-amber] -- Spring Valley, Ca
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 14:07:42 PDT

In <Bv9JM5.J5D@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
g-martin1@uiuc.edu (Gregory A. Martin) writes:

>robb@maths.tcd.ie (Robert Bashford) writes:
>
>>g-martin1@uiuc.edu (Gregory A. Martin) writes:
>
>>>If anyone knows of an ftp site where scripts can be archived, please notify
>>>me by e-mail ASAP.
>
>>  no, just post it to this group 
>
>You seem to have missed the point -- posting such large files to a group
>wreaks havok on some systems, especially those with limited file space.
>I tried and took the heat for doing so. That's why an ftp site is the
>best way to go.
>
>					Greg Martin
>					g-martin1@uiuc.edu


Agreed. Posting to the newsgroup is not a good idea. FTP or e-mail is the
way to go.

ProLine:  rsopicki@pro-amber
Internet: rsopicki@pro-amber.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-amber!rsopicki
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (ce)
Subject: Re: Chocolate Nazi-cles
Organization: Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum GmbH, Hamburg
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 15:25:46 GMT

In article <16872883B.PETERC@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu> PETERC@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (Peter Correnty) writes:
>In article <1992Sep30.121243.9804@news.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE>
>k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (ce) writes:
> 
>>
>>Perhaps in dis/honor of the recent surge of Neo-Nazi related activities
>>here in Germany, i'm in the process of putting together a list of cult-
>>fave films dealing with the resurrection of Nazis post-WWII. So far i've
>>come up with 3 films:
>>
>>	"They Saved Hitler's Brain" - Obvious choice.
>>
>>	"The Frozen Dead" - Great howler with dead Nazis hanging in
>>			    a freezer!
>>
>>	"The Boys From Brazil" - Another obvious choice
>>
>>I know there's others. Anyone care to contribute?
>>
>>
>How about ...
> 
>Caligula Reincarnated as Hitler
>Fraulein Devil
>Nazi Love Camp 27 (aka Love Camp 27)
>Even Hitler Had a Girlfriend
>All of the SS Women-in-prison torture movies ... like
>  She-Devils of the SS.
>Do the Ilsa series count?  I would imagine so.
> 
And I just remembered: Hitler's Son - Starring Bud Cort as the Title Character!

-Matt