HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Distribution: jadpc2
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 12:38:59 -0800
From: Zero_One@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Subject: Procedure to modify ZYXEL motherboard for new ROMS
Comment-To: Michael_Schuster@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Reply-To: Zero_One@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
X-FSC-PATH: 202/701
X-FSC-EID: 10ca 2bdbaf46
X-FSC-PID:  FM+ 2.1

 > In article <1992Oct6.185438.16741@awdprime.austin.ibm.com>
 > fredriks@austin.ibm.com (Lars Fredrikson (CONTRACTOR)) writes:
 >>
 >>Hi,
 >> A while ago, somebody posted the procedure to modify the ZYXEL
 >> motherboard to enable it to accept the new 1Mb Eproms.
 >>
 >> Could that somebody please repost or send me E-mail at
 >>
 >>     fredriks@asiago.cs.wisc.edu
 >>
 >>
 >> Thanks a lot.
 >>
 >> Sincerely
 >>
 >>     Lars Fredriksen

 > U-1496 Series Modem Firmware Upgrade with 1Mbit EPROM
 > -----------------------------------------------------

 > The 1Mbit EPROM has 32pins while the 512K EPROM has only 28 pins.
 > Among the
 > four additional pins the 1M bit EPROM has, only pin 2 and pin 32
 > need signal
 > correction, pin 1 and pin 31 have no connection inside the chip.
 > If you put 1M
 > bit EPROM chip in front of you with pin 1 on the lower left
 > corner, the 28
 > pins on the right have the same signal connection as the 512K
 > EPROM chip.

 > There are three cases for 1Mbit firmware upgrade:

 > (1) There are already a pair of 32pin sockets installed on the
 > modem main
 >     board.

 >     Just install the 1Mbit EPROMS in the 32-pin sockets.  Note
 > that there
 >     are no pin sockets for pin 1 and pin 31, no connection is
 > needed for those
 >     two pins.

 > (2) 28-pin sockets on the modem board but pin holes on the board
 > exist for
 >     pin 2 and pin 32.

 >     Solder in two single-pin sockets for pin 2 and pin 32 and you
 > can install
 >     the 1M bit EPROM.  You need some skill to solder the single-
 > pin socket.  It
 >     is better to use a SIP 8-pin single-row pin socket as an
 > alignment tool.
 >     Plug the single-row pin socket into the existing socket and
 > the single-pin
 >     socket you want to solder and it will hold the single-pin
 > socket in place
 >     while you solder.

 > (3) 28 pin sockets on the modem board and no pin hole exists on
 > the board for
 >     pin 2 and pin 32.

 >     We do NOT recommend to install 1Mbit EPROM on this case.  You
 > can do the
 >     following hardware modifications but it will void the warranty
 > and it is
 >     difficult to remove and reprogram the EPROMS.

 >     (a) Solder a jump-wire to short pin 32 and pin 30 of the
 > EPROM.
 >     (b) Install the 1Mbit EPROMS on the 28-pin sockets with the
 > left 4pins
 >         outside the sockets.
 >     (c) Solder a wire to connect pin 2 of the EPROM to pin 45 of
 > the MC68000
 >         and solder a wire to connect pin 30 and pin 32 of EPROM.
 > --
Any modifications to the modem as stated above in procedures 2 & 3
will void your warranty.

Tyrone Horton
(Zero One)
Tech Support
ZyXEL USA

---
 * Origin: -=ZyXEL USA=- 1:202/701.101 (1:103/356.6)
From: bdb@becker.GTS.ORG (Bruce Becker)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: 40% Discount of ZyXELs
Date: 13 Oct 92 00:37:27 GMT
Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario

In article <322@snll-arpagw.llnl.gov> hwstock@snll-arpagw.llnl.gov (stockman harlan w) writes:
|In article <1015346.2AD172AE@cmhgate.fidonet.org> Adam.Frix@p18.f20.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Adam Frix) writes:
|>
|>EP> Contest deadline is Oct 12. Contest consists of designing 
|>EP> an ANSI log in screen for BBS use that promotes the ZyXEL 
|>EP> modem line. 
|>
|>geee....ummmm....last I checked, I can't do ANSI graphics on my Mac.  And of
|>course since I run TeleFinder for my BBS, the fancy graphic was done in a
|>proper graphics program and appears to the user when he launches the
|>TeleFinder/User software, not when logging on.
|>
|>I guess the Zero One Networking folks are under the same illusion that US
|>Robotics is--that the world contains nothing but DOS machines.
|>
|This may seem surprising, but "ANSI" is not specific to DOS machines; an ANSI 
|terminal is effectively a VT52, plus some extensions. Many BBS's also send IBM (high ascii) line-
|draw characters, which might be confused with "ANSI"; but if you strip the 
|high bit, the line-draw stuff goes away.


	Last time I checked, MS-DOS ANSI was an improperly
	specified subset of VT-100 terminal codes with
	several incompatibilities and private extensions.


	In addition, the character set is incompatible with
	standard VT-100 character sets, especially with
	respect to control characters and to characters
	with the high bit set.


	Many MAC & other terminal emulators do ANSI 3.64
	and VT-100 reasonably well, but pclone "ANSI" is
	different enough to warrant a special profile for
	proper emulation.


-- 
  ,u,	 Bruce Becker			Toronto, Ontario
a /i/	 Internet: bdb@becker.gts.org	Uucp: ...!web!becker!bdb
 `\o\-e	 "We want the worm, and we want a cow!"
 _< /_	 	- More Jimison, ordering drinks for his table
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: walrath@faw.uni-ulm.de (Wayne K. Walrath)
Subject: Supra V.32bis not working with mac
Keywords: Supra Macintosh
Organization: FAW (Research Institute For Applied Knowledge Processing, Ulm, Germany)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 17:31:46 GMT

I purchased two Supra V.32bis fax modems  while in
the States for a friend and I over two months ago, 
and we still have not got them to work yet (I know, everyone is thinking now that
we must be real dummies...).  First they sent us Windows software and cables, 
but I ordered the Mac version. Then I took off immediately for Germany and had
to resolve the problem over there. 

So far I have not even tried faxing yet, but have only attempted to dial
another modem. When I try to dial any number, the comm. software gives
me a message that the "Modem is not responding." I can issue commands to the
modem, and everytime the lights start dancing on the front of the
case, but NO messages are returned to the computer. If I type
"AT" I get lights, but no OK in return (or any other kind of message).
I have tried every logical command to set, view and change the settings.

Does anyone know what could be going on?

Supra in Germany told us today that our modems will not work in Europe,
that they are outfitted with different ROMs to fight 'grey imports.'
This may be so (and if anyone knows the truth, please reply), but it 
seems that the problem I am having is independent of the phone lines. Or is
it? The modem just doesn't seem to be communicating with the computer. We have
already tried three different comm programs and checked the cable with an
old modem. It worked fine.

Thanks for any light you can shed on my troubles. Please CC my account, or
respond privately, since I am not always able to keep up with the group.

Wayne

             walrath@faw.uni-ulm.de
From: gerrit@laosinh.stgt.sub.org (Gerrit Heitsch)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Replacing UART
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 18:46:14 MET
Distribution: world
Organization: Lao-Sinh project (private UUCP site)

In article <1992Sep30.230114.21356@klaava.Helsinki.FI>, Jussi T Someristo writes:

> 	  - CIC83450AE
Replace this chip with the 16550, it's a 16450-compatible UART
manufactured by CIC.

> 	  - 8750-BT / UM82C11
This chip is responsible for the parallel port.

> 	My terminal program says there is an 16450.
Your terminal is right...

hope it helps
 Gerrit

-- 
         Gerrit Heitsch  Moenchweg 16  7038 Holzgerlingen  Germany
  Logical adresses: UUCP: gerrit@laosinh.stgt.sub.org FIDO: (2:247/706.9)
                 If you are from outer space, please use:
  universe!local-cluster!milkyway!solarsystem!terra!europe!laosinh!gerrit
From: mehdi@armon.rain.com (Mehdi Attaran)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Help on init strings for Intel 14.4EX w/Telix??
Date: 7 Oct 92 15:44:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: armon.1992Oct7.154457.29069
Organization: Armon Public Access Unix System -- Portland, OR, USA

bac2@engr.uark.edu (Brett Cato) writes:

>     Can someone give me some suggestions on a GOOD initialization string for
>using an Intel 14.4EX modem with Telix 3.15 on a 386??  What strings do other
>Intel owners use???

Nothing special is needed... Just use AT&F.  You may of course turn the
speaker off/lower if you wish, but AT&F setting is what I use with all
Procomm Plus, Telix, and Qmodem.


-- 
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Mehdi Attaran		mehdi@armon.rain.com	..!uunet!m2xenix!armon!mehdi |
| 			Data: (503) 642-3270	Voice: (503) 649-0719	     |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: magarret@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (COMPUTER DUDETTE)
Subject: Hardware handshaking cables
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: cmh
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 22:09:01 GMT

I asked a few days ago whether anyone knew the phone number for Zoom.  I 
haven't heard anything, so I assume no one knows?
Anyways, surely someone knows where around Columbus I can buy a hardware 
handshaking cable for a Mac Classic II.  I hope.  I called Microcenter and even
they don't know the number for Zoom!  This is getting quite ridiculous!

Marti Garrett
magarret@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
-- 
**********************************************
THIS SPACE TEMPORARILY UNDER CONSTRUCTION!
email:  magarret@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
**********************************************
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael Rosen)
Subject: Suggestions for 14.4K fax/modem please
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 01:37:03 GMT

I've seen talk of the Supra and others and I'd like to find out a
general concensus if I could.  Are that many people really having
problems with the Supra or is it just a minority of users?

What is the feeling towards internal vs. external?  Someone said to me
that with an internal, should I need to reset my machine, I'd be
disconnected from my session, unlike with an external.  Would this be
the case?

Is incoming voice/fax/modem detection a big factor for most people?
If I don't have it, is it much of a hassle to set up to receive a fax
should I need to (which wouldn't be often)?  

I may consider the Gateway Telepath since it's a good price...that is
if the general feeling is that it works fine now (I know about the
break key problem).  

Any information would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael Rosen						"Beer - It does
Tau Epsilon Phi - George Washington University		 a body good."
mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu
Michael.Rosen@bbs.oit.unc.edu or @lambada.oit.unc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser)
Subject: Re: Whose modem is it safe/correct to buy?
Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix  (508) 655-3848
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 17:59:56 GMT

>>Any recommendations on a v32.bis external for switched use between a Mac and
>>a PC? Any good ones with FAX send and receive facilities?

I never would have dreamt of this brand myself, but someone told me
he recently got a GVC 14.4 and has had good luck with it.  Apparently it
was around $260.
-- 
bill@unixland.natick.ma.us                      ESIX Mailing List Moderator
Public Access UNIX/USENET/E-MAIL!  UUCP Accounts Available!  (508) 655-3848
5 lines  -  Located in Natick, MA   USA    Supporting V.32/PEP/V.42bis, etc.
From: wilson@solomon.technet.sg (Wilson Leong)
Subject: Qblazer with SUN IPC ???
Organization: TECHNET Unit (Singapore)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 06:26:31 GMT


Has anyone tried to set up a dial out modem on a SUN IPC sunos4.1.2 using a
qblazer modem? In my remote file, I've specified hayes type modem but when I
run tip, it always gives me an error message " can't synchronize with hayes"
Changing the baud rate does not make any difference. Thank you in advance if
anyone out there can help me. Pleaseee...


######################################################################
File /etc/remote :

U-38400:\
	:el=^D^U^C^S^Q^O@:du:at=hayes:ie=#$%:oe=^D:br#38400:tc=dialer:
######################################################################

File /etc/gettytab

w|P.38400|38400-baud:\
	:sp#38400:p8:ms=crtscts:
######################################################################

Init string used for qblazer:

AT M1 S0=0 Q0 V1 X4 &C1 &D2 S58=2 S59=1 S68=2 S180=2 S190=1



*** Wilson Leong ***

Technet Unit, Computer Centre       Internet:  wilson@solomon.technet.sg
National University of Singapore 
Singapore 0511			    Telephone: (65) 772-6524

------------------------------------------------------------------------


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: st1n2@rosie.uh.edu (McCoy, Mark)
Subject: Practical Peripherals 14400
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 23:21:00 GMT

I am currently shopping for a 14400 modem.  I have been following this
group for about a week and haven't seen any posts about the Practical
Peripherals 14400.  I have seen lots of posts on the Zyxel 1496e, but
I have been unable to find a local (Houston) dealer who carries them, and
out of town places I have contacted are back ordered.  The Practical
Peripherals 14400 has been recommended to me, but I know nothing about it.
The one person I know who has one has been very satisfied, but I would
like to get some more input on the PP before I plunk down the cash for
one.  Also, if anyone knows of a reliable Zyxel dealer who isn't back
ordered I would like to hear about them.

Thanks in advance

Mark McCoy  (st1n2@jetson.uh.edu)
From: chris@surfcty.com (Chris Johnston)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Only National NS16550's OK/bug-free?
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 92 22:23:28 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Surf City Software, Orange, Calfornia - DUDE!

huntting@advtech.uswest.com (Brad Huntting) writes:

> In article <1992Oct03.101020.16090@digibd.com> rick@digibd.com (Rick Richards
> >We ship *hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions* of 16550's in our
> >serial products, so I went and asked the fellow whose had the most
> >experience programming those parts.  The following is my summary of his
> >opinion of 16550's from the more than half dozen vendors of them out there:
> 
> >	The only 16550 which does not have *any* bugs in its
> >	implementation is the Western Digital.  Oddly enough,
> >	the National 16550A (the 16550 was invented by them),
> >	has a bug where a received character can get stuck in
> >	the FIFO.  The TI part, which is derived from the
> >	original National masks, has this particular bug fixed.
> >	There are a number of other bugs that crop up in the various
> >	implementations.  All of these problems are very low
> >	probability or can be worked around in software.
> 
Well, folks...

I'm of some different opinion.  The WD part as well has serious problems. 
 I have found that the only _true_ part to use is the NS16550AF part.

I've recently installed the 16550AFV in this PS/2 and a 16550AFN in
another machine.  I get 100% transfers and I move some 30MB a night
worth of stuff.  It is certainly a relief that I can now get transfers
that are clean.  

Enter my vote for the 16550AF series part (by National Semi only).

Where to get 'em?  anywhere that carries parts, Fry's ($10) or
a major distie such as schweber (lex) or someone like that.

Chris
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: tedc@ee.ubc.ca (ted chen)
Subject: Re: USR Sportster Info Needed!REGISTER
Organization: University of BC, Electrical Engineering
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 20:04:01 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.071419.14237@unix.portal.com> dgm@shell.portal.com (David G Metzger) writes:
>In article <1992Oct7.181415.7390@iscsvax.uni.edu> eadie5295@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:
>>  I would like to know all of the info on the new 14.4 Sportster (w/fax).
>>I would also like to know if it has the 16550 UART and if it will initiate a
>>fall-forward (and other neat-oh stuff).
>>
>>  Thanx in advanse.
>>-- 
>>+----------------------------+               _   _   __   _   _  
>>|        Trent Eadie         |              | | | | |  \ | | | |
>>|                            |              | | | | | |\ | | | |
>>| eadie5295@iscsvax.uni.edu  |              | |_| | | | \  | | |
>>+----------------------------+              |_____| |_|  \_| |_|
>>"Remember- every woman has
>> a birthday...suit."  -TMH
>
>    1) Yes, the Sportster 14.4 w/fax will fall both back and forward.  It
>says so in the manual, and I verified that fact with USR's tech support.
>( Although the person I initially spoke to at USR was hopelessly confused.
>He kept thinking I was asking about ASL, which I wasn't.  The hardest part
>of the exercise was convincing him that he was confused and getting him to
>go ask a REAL technician.  He called back the next business day, considerably
>enlightened, and verified that the Sporster 14.4/Fax can initiate fall 
>forward/back. )
>

I understand the fall forward/fall back is in the v.32bis specification.  How  
is USR's ASL related to this feature?  ie. what's the difference between
ASL and the regular v.32bis rate changing?


---
Ted Chen            <tedc@ee.ubc.ca>
From: rpd@twinkletoes.sbi.com (Richard P. Daley)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Are the mail order houses shipping the new Supra ROM yet?
Keywords: Supra, ROM
Date: 6 Oct 92 23:18:52 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Fulcrum - Salomon Brothers, NY

Does anyone know if the mail order houses are shipping Supra V.32bis
modems with the new ROMs yet?  I'm about to order one, but it seems
silly to order the thing, and then immediately have to contact
Supra about getting the upgrade.
From: RAF@CU.NIH.GOV ("Roger Fajman")
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re:  +++ sequence problem with USR DS 16.8k
Date: 10 Oct 92 18:26:15 GMT
Organization: The Internet

>  issue the + + + escape sequence on my USR Dual Standard 16.8k
> I immediately get a NO CARRIER and the modem hangs up.  I want
> to enter into command mode, not hang up!  My old HST never
> had this problem.  I looked through all the settings and I
> can't find anything that makes a difference.  What's the
> deal here?
>
> -BarryB

I'm not certain about the newer USR Dual Standards, but the older
ones have a dip switch that controls whether the modem drops the
connection or just escapes to command mode.

Roger Fajman                                   Telephone:  +1 301 402 1246
National Institutes of Health                  BITNET:     RAF@NIHCU
Bethesda, Maryland, USA                        Internet:   RAF@CU.NIH.GOV
From: sjl@uknet.ac.uk (Sean.Leviseur)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Hacking USR ROMS [4.2 - 4.1]
Date: 12 Oct 92 15:58:24 GMT
Organization: UKnet

In article <3181.212.uupcb@yob.sccsi.com> craig.ford@yob.sccsi.com (Craig Ford) writes:
...
...
>The copyrights to the HST protocol are held by US Robotics, Inc. Are you
>inferring that the purchase of a Sportster with v4.1 ROM, gives one a de
>facto license to use this copyrighted material?

Copyrights prevent duplication. There is no duplication involved, USR have
the copyright and they gave you the ROM. End of story.

The maybe legal catches in this affair (although I doubt it), but copyright
is not one of them.

	sean

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: Hacking USR ROMS [4.2 - 4.1]
Keywords: Supervisors.ROM.Hacks
Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745 
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 21:36:05 GMT

wwf1@ra.msstate.edu (Bill Ford) writes:

>This is an interesting ethical issue.  Two topics really exist:
>1.) Is it wrong for 4.1 users to use their modem as a DS.

>Issuing an AT command is not modifying the firmware.  AT commands are how you
>control your modem.  Learning how to shift your car without your clutch does
>not break intellectual copyright laws.  

>2.) Is it wrong for 4.2 users to hack their ROMS.

>It is not illegal to rip pages out of a book if you don't like the ending,
>nor is it wrong to "trick out" your new car's engine by installing better
>chips in the engine computer.  Legality aside, software issues like this

Is it wrong to modify your videocipher II TVRO descrambler to receive
programming via satellite for which you don't subscibe to?  

The programmers say it is illegal.  I say it is if for profit, but not
for personal use.

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
From: fredriks@austin.ibm.com (Lars Fredrikson (CONTRACTOR))
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Procedure to modify ZYXEL motherboard for new ROMS
Date: 6 Oct 92 18:54:38 GMT
Organization: IBM Austin
Originator: fredriks@grubbs.austin.ibm.com


Hi,
	A while ago, somebody posted the procedure to modify the ZYXEL 
	motherboard to enable it to accept the new 1Mb Eproms. 

	Could that somebody please repost or send me E-mail at

		fredriks@asiago.cs.wisc.edu


	Thanks a lot.

	Sincerely

		Lars Fredriksen
From: denham@hmsp04.wg3.waii.com (Scott Denham X7117)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Telebit Qblazer
Date: 7 Oct 92 15:27:56 GMT
Organization: Western Geo. - Div of Western Atlas Intn'l Inc., Houston, TX

In article <Bvpq1B.2vn@gator.rn.com> larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:

 (With reference to USR service & support)
>Free firmware upgrades for the life of the modem, unlike other vendors
>who only ship firmware to correct existing bugs.

I'm certainly not going to bash USR's product (I'm quite happy with it) or
service (I've had no need to use it)... but I don't think that's an accurate
statement. I bought (under the sysop program) one of the early "v.small" 
Dual Standards, prior to the time the FAX option was released. I understand
that this is just a firmware upgrade, and it's far from free ($99 as I recall).


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: shoutko@vxcrna.cern.ch (Vitali X 6290)
Subject: SZ/RZ on vms
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 10:51:00 GMT

Hello everybody
I am  looking for exec or sources for sz/rz for vax/vms
Any help will be greatly  appreciated.
Thanks, Vitali.

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: pascoe@rocky.gte.com (Dave Pascoe)
Subject: Re: MNP5 with WorldBlazer
Organization: GTE/MSED - Needham Heights, MA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 17:40:36 GMT


: I'm having problems with users who are trying to dial in to a
: WorldBlazer with 2400 baud MNP-5 capable modems.  It seems that the
: MNP negotiation isn't succeeding.  The user usually gets Carrier
: Detect and then the connection hangs up.  Sometimes a complete
: connection is made but it's a standard 2400 baud connection.

A couple of people asked about this.  This turned out to be register
S111, which governs protocol support(like UUCP and Kermit spoofing).
You have to set S111=0 (I had S111=255) which disables protocol
support. Then MNP negotiation will work.
--
Dave Pascoe
Internet: pascoe@rocky.gte.com
GTE/MSED - Needham Heights, MA
(617) 455-5704
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: USR Courier HST are getting flakey as they get older.
Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745 
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 21:42:39 GMT

Adam.Frix@p18.f20.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Adam Frix) writes:

>screens, and have a chat with USR tech support.  They're more than happy to
>help.  Also, they're the only reliable source for this kind of information.

Do you (or anyone else) have any info on if the new DS upgrade (to v.fast)
will include support for fax class service 2?

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems