HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kms@world.std.com (Kelly M Stanonik)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Akira:deepest animated movie out.
Date: 7 Apr 92 06:55:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: world.BMBsLA.Fzw
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA

tatum@currituck.cs.unc.edu (Thomas Tatum) writes:

>My little brother turned me on to it two years ago.  He had a pirated
>copy of it and we watched it and I was in awe!  It last for 2 and a
>half hours.  I ussually hate longer movies, but we rewound it and

The English Language version is 124 minutes.  Those 4 minutes may seem
like a half hour to you...

>1) what is the whole amoeba thing that tetsuo turns into at the end of
>the movie?  I have always wondered about that.  Guess it has something
>to do with the Japanese philosophy of total consumption.(I don't know)

The amoeba thing is tetsuo's body's inability to control and contain
the psychic power which the govt. experiments gave him.  They do this
from time to time in the continuing comic series.  Most recently
a deadly biotoxin acted as medicine for Tetsuo and gave him control
of himself again.  Pretty much any time he gets injured he starts to
amoebaize.

>2)  At the end of the movie, after every thing is over, you hear this
>voice say, "I am tetsuo!" and these wild colors.  Was he supposed to
>be the hero?  I hope not

Who knows?  The movie had too much ground to cover and isn't as good as
the comic IMO, but is still quite good and has some very impressive
animation which must have taken forever to create.  

The ending of the movie does not correspond to anything in the comic
so far.
-- 
// Kelly Stanonik         | "Clipper apps for the 90's, 00's, 10's & beyond" 
// Profit Concepts, Inc.  | "We write software, so you don't have tooooooo"
// -----------------------'
From: sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Tapeheads
Date: 6 Apr 92 15:05:43 GMT
Article-I.D.: ux1.1992Apr6.150543.29183
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

gmkoenig@acsu.buffalo.edu (phord phive) writes:

>km2a+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kenneth E. Mohnkern) writes:
>>I'm a big fan of John Cusack, and Tapeheads. This flick was directed by
>as he gets an idea or Josh (Tim Robbin)'s refusal to do product placement with
>the Miller sign right in the shot (how many years before Wayne's World?)


"Return of the Killer Tomatoes," which I think came before "Wayne's World"
but after "Tapeheads," also had a fantastic running gag about product
placement.


                                   --Steve Stelter
                                  sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
From: ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (T.F. Eccles)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: aka???/
Date: 14 Apr 92 00:35:23 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.

jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes:

>]}Phil aka this is a very sad time, indeed...
>]Dan aka I feel your pain.  I am one with the universe.  I am GOD!?
>]BOW DOWN AND WORSHIP ME AND I WILL MAKE YOU ALL SUFFER BECAUSE YOU ARE
>]ALL SERVANTS AND I AM NOT THEEJLKAJL;KJDS LKAJSDF  AAAAHGGGGGG   it
>]hurts.
>Jester aka quit whining you pooftah!!!!!!!!!!!!

Look yu, I think I need to see your certificate of deityship before
I bowed down to you. I mean, how would it look, if I a fully guild-provided
worshipped bowed down before a non-deitised immortal, of either or both sex.
And I mean, look at those knees. Ha. hahah/ hahahahahahahahahahah

Eccles aka Quetzalcoatl will come again.
Xref: sparky alt.cult-movies:4153 rec.arts.sf.movies:3319
From: domalley@unix1.tcd.ie (Slartibartfast            (alias Daniel O'Malley))
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies,rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: T2 is *so* full of holes - Here's another one!
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:23:31 GMT
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin

Considering the amount of money they spent on Terminator 2, it's amazing
at how many plot inconsistencies have been spotted by the eagle-eyed
netters out there. So here's another one. 

I just noticed: when the T1000 arrives in Los Angeles in
1995, he is buck naked. So he nicks a set of clothes from a passing
police officer. Therefore, the clothes are not part of the T1000 itself,
but real fabric. However, later scenes in the film have T1000 being
shot, and the uniform miraculously reforming over the bullet-holes.
Also: in the asylum, where he walks through the barred doors, the
uniform passes straight through (Unlike the gun he was carrying).
These scenes would suggest that the clothes _are_ part of the T1000
himself, in contrast to the opening scene.

The upshot of all this is: the T1000 did *not* need to steal a set of
clothes, as he could just 'morph' into any outfit he chose.
Also, since he puts on a _real_ set of clothes in the opening scene,
what happens to them? At what point does he change into his
mimetic-poly-alloy suit??

I know this is slightly pointless, as there have been several other
plot holes in T2 pointed out over the last while, and so I can't hope to
get a rational answer, but what the hell.

Anybody got any reasonable suggestions?
Daniel.
--
+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+  |-----Daniel O'Malley-----|----"Look - I didn't mount an invasion just to----|  |-------------------------|-------whisk some flippin' eggs!", protested------|
|        //               |----the Supreme Dalek from the TARDIS kitchen.----|  |   ====//  ====    ====  |--------------------------------------------------|
| //   // //   // //   // |---"In the begining, the universe was created.----|  |  ===//   ===// //   //  |-This has made a lot of people angry and has been-|
|-------------------------|---------widely regarded as a bad move."----------|  |--domalley@unix1.tcd.ie--|----The Restaurant at the End Of The Universe-----|  +-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+
From: hcb0219@zeus.tamu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Monty Python Archives?????
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:52:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Monty Python flics????? Thanks in advance

Scout
hcb0219@zeus.tamu.edu
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Monday, 13 Apr 1992 11:18:23 EDT
From: <JDK116@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: ALIENS III

I seem to recall someone posting a synopsis of the ALIENS III story line/script
 Whomever may have done that, could you please E-Mail me a copy of that
synopsis, I'd be most interested.

Thanks.
Xref: sparky alt.cult-movies:3981 alt.fan.monty-python:2765
From: jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies,alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: aka???
Date: 11 Apr 92 12:56:20 GMT
Followup-To: alt.cult-movies
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

>Phil aka just seeing what I can start
Jester aka just exactly what are we trying to start???????
-- 
|Join the Omnipotent Overlords of the Omniverse today. Add to intelligent   |
|political, environmental, and social discussions. Buck the growing trend of|
|apathy in the world today, and most importantly have some well earned fun. |
|Read all about us on alt.overlords or e-mail : jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu   |
From: jos@and.nl (Jos Horsmeier)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: aka???
Date: 12 Apr 92 12:26:23 GMT
Organization: AND Software BV Rotterdam

In article <44896@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes:
|>Phil aka just seeing what I can start
|Jester aka just exactly what are we trying to start???????
Jos aka Got No Idea, But I Think I Like It! *GORN*!
From: phygod72@nic.gac.edu (Phil )
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Terminator - what an awful movie...
Date: 12 Apr 92 02:21:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr11.202131.802


Hi there all you Terminator fans!  Just wanted to say that Arnold ought to get  
off drugs, and Sarah should _really_ see a shrink.

Phil aka enjoying the takeover?
From: bigk@cs.uq.oz.au (Kathy Williamson)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: name that movie!
Date: 13 Apr 92 22:28:59 GMT
Reply-To: bigk@cs.uq.oz.au

In <5114@cygnus.sco.COM> paulm@sco.COM (Paul Middlehurst) writes:

>boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com (The fox so cunning and free) writes:

>>FIVE MILLION YEARS TO EARTH was one of the Quatermass films, in which an
>>ancient spaceship is found buried under London.

>Errm ... "Quatermass and the Pit" methinks


The film was called FIVE MILLION YEARS TO EARTH.
The television series was called QUATERMASS AND THE PIT.
From: leeper@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Mark R. Leeper)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Peter Sellers in The Party...
Date: 8 Apr 92 01:33:34 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Apr7.051449.356@ucc.su.OZ.AU> smcneil@metro (Shannon McNeil) writes:
> From article <1992Apr7.015502.26126@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, by be126@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bob Powers):

> > Anyone remember seeing the movie "The Party"? I haven't seen
> > it on TV for years, and it wasn't released on videotape as
> > far as I can tell - my friends and I consider it a 'cult'
> > filmbecause it is hilarious and it may never appear anywhere
> > again...

> "The Party" can't be as good as "Being There" (My favourite PS movie).
> Not that Ive seen the former.

I have to say I would much rather see THE PARTY again than see BEING
THERE again, though they are very different films.  I am not keen on
the Clouseau films.  But THE PARTY is slapstick with Blake Edwards
directing Peter Sellers, like the Clouseau films, yet it is REALLY
funny.  It falls apart in the last third, but up to that point it is
very, very funny.

				Mark Leeper
				...att!mtgzy!leeper
				(908)957-5619
From: bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Robert Church)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Colored??
Date: 4 Apr 92 16:52:45 GMT
Organization: Ohio University School of Art. Athens

In article <1992Mar30.153430.10444@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> bjbartlett@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (The Bart-Man) writes:

>Robin?  I already think that it's a big error casting a colored actor as 
							 ^^^^^^^
You're thinking of Clarke Gable. Ted Turner had him colored in Gone with
the Wind. Micheal Jackson was born black, no one colored him.

Bob Church
bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu


-- 
*********************************************
*    bob church                             *
*    bchurch.oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu           *
*********************************************
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: dascoser.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu
Subject: Re: T2 - Why didn't Sarah die???
Organization: Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 20:28:07 GMT

jjuhne@daimi.aau.dk (Jesper Juhne) writes:

> shinosjr@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (John R Shinoskie) writes:
> 
> >In article <grantham.702262461@milton> grantham@milton.u.washington.edu  
> >(Henry Grantham) writes:
> > But I did notice that the scene with  
> >> >the  
> >> >> asylum guard was filmed using twins.
> >> 
> >> How could you tell?  Have you ever seen "Deadringers"?  Both twins were
> >> played by one person using a computer aided special effects technique.
> >> And in T-2, they certainly had the budget for those type of effects.
> 
> >I looked at the credits.  Try it sometime.
> 
> >	Schnozz
> This is of course the best way of finding out. But didnt you see 
> "Good Morning Vietnam" here the asylum guards played two office types.
> And I've seen them in other movies too. Just cant remember which, they are
> often used in this way.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         :
> Jesper Juhne
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> |  In Denmark we love subtitles      |
> |                                    |
> |  From Highlander:                  |
> |  "Headhunter stalks city"          |
> |   translated to:                   |
> |  "Kyller creates fruit in city"    |
> |                                    |
> --------------------------------------

They were also the twin scientists in Gremlin's II

Dascoser



"Don't worry about protection Helen, baby. I brought along a pack of 
Trojens." ---- Paris
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: sabotkap@woods.ulowell.edu (Pete Sabotka)
Subject: Re: T2 is *so* full of holes - Here's another one!
Organization: University of Lowell
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 03:45:04 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.214808.2318@mks.com>, andrew@mks.com (Andrew Hamilton-Wright) writes:
> 
> On this point - it is stated that the T-1000 cannot replicate anything
> "complex" (ie. Guns, Radios, etc), But, the T-1000 carries a walkie-talkie,
> which works - so, the walkie talkie must therefore be real, right
> (not part of the T1000)
> BUT - 
> when the T-1000 masks himself as the floor, the walkie-talkie is not there,
> (it obviosly couln't survive if crushed to the width the T-1000 must
> have at the moment, so, therefore, any REAL walkie-talkie must have
> been thrown away somewhere (so far, so good)
> EXEPT, later in the film, he gets information from the walkie-talkie
> while again in the form of the cop!, so, the only logical explanation
> would have to be that after leaving the psych-ward in pursuit of
> the Conners, he then either went back to get the walkie-talkie, or got
> himself a new one? - I don't think so!
> 

The walkie-talkie didn't seem to work at all earlier in the movie (we don't
hear anything broadcast across it), so at that time it may have been part
of the metal alloy of the T1000.  However, when the T1000 gets the motorcycle
from the other cop at the mental hospital ("Say... That's a nice bike...").
I assume he kills off the motorcycle cop and then forms the little motor-
cycle extras on himself (the helmet and sunglasses), but takes the belt with
the walkie-talkie from the 'dead'? cop so this is how we hear it later at
Dyson's house.  

OR

When we hear the broadcast (that Arnold and Sarah have been spotted at the 
Cyberdyne building) at Dyson's house, it may just be the bike in the 
background...

Pete
<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>
This is a .sig:                        This is a .sig in binary:
----                                   ----
Pete Sabotka, UMass-Lowell             @ma.L0^  _1f\|P"
  DECnet: WOODS::SABOTKAP              Ta#%HTQ*[  2S'pUq
Internet: sabotkap@aspen.ulowell.edu   1&#*  %^2E)A<!2I\\SNMs6YvdN~  

                             Any Questions ?
<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: garrem@aix.rpi.edu (Matthew Olsen Garretson)
Subject: Re: Request For Godzilla Info (Jet Jaguar)
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 04:11:45 GMT

In article <NF8TiB1w164w@cybernet.cse.fau.edu> dascoser.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu writes:
>lightnin@penny.WPI.EDU (...And it Hardly Ever Blows Up Anymore) writes:
>> Don't forget that he knows semafore signalling.  (At least, I assume that tha
>> is how he talked to Godzilla and Megalon).
>
>Yeah, but how do THEY know it?

It's just one of those "giant-monster" things, I guess. 

-- 
Matt Garretson                       :-)                          garrem@rpi.edu
Date:  7 Apr 92 01:16:48 GMT
From: axolotl@socs.uts.edu.au (Iain Sinclair)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Akira:deepest animated movie out.
Reply-To: axolotl@socs.uts.edu.au
Organization: University of Technology, Sydney

antonp@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
 >They are also not the "final product" of this
 >genetic experiment, but merely a step on the way, of
 >sorts. At the beginning of the movie, Tetsuo comes in contact
 >with one of these "children," and in so doing,
 >gains the powers they possess (from the motorcycle
 >accident).

No, no!  After he crashes into #26 (the kid), the military (who are
looking for #26) take both of them away.  Tests on Tetsuo show that
he is slightly unstable, but has massive natural psychic potential.  So
the Colonel lets the Doctor perform some experiments on him (which
will alter the genetic structure of his brain).

Thomas Tatum  tatum@cs.unc.edu:
 >>1) what is the whole amoeba thing that tetsuo turns into at the end of
 >>the movie?  I have always wondered about that.  Guess it has something
 >>to do with the Japanese philosophy of total consumption.(I don't know)

Er, no, not really. :-)  Simply, the power Tetsuo has developed is
too much for his body to contain, so he undergoes a rather rapid
"evolution", which is way beyond his control. 

 >>2)  At the end of the movie, after every thing is over, you hear this
 >>voice say, "I am tetsuo!" and these wild colors.  Was he supposed to
 >>be the hero?  I hope not

Apparently, Akira saw Tetsuo as a major anomaly in "our" universe,
and so decided to remove him from it.  What Akira was actually doing was
creating a big bang, not a nuclear explosion. :-)  The end shows Tetsuo
in the universe Akira created.


--
Iain Sinclair   axolotl@socs.uts.edu.au                             ne cede.
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: sasso@flounder.phy.anl.gov (John F. Sasso)
Subject: Re: Any "Liquid Sky" fans out there
Organization: Argonne National Laboratory
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 02:07:12 GMT

In article <1992Apr12.214737.9916@eng.ufl.edu> emf@hopi.ugrad.ee.ufl.edu (Ed Filangeri) writes:
>I recently saw a very interesting film entitled "Liquid Sky".  If anyone has seen this movie, please post your thoughts concerning it.

I saw LS originally at the Biograph, on the small screen, in the front
row.  The big exploding balls were amazing.  It's ashame that I wasn't
on drugs at the time; it really felt like it!  ;-)

Likes:
The original score.
The German doctor with the telescope.
The mother.  "Do you have any jumbo shrimp?"
Anne giving herself a blow job.

Dislikes:
It was set in NY.

							John F Sasso




-- 
"The only way to true inspiration is the study of TedDo.  And lots
of MauMau, of course."  The Elvis Lectures
"I am not the False Bob, I am a free man."  The Book of FalseBobs
"Since the introduction of MauMau, HP sales have skyrocketed." Book of MauMau
From: boucher@neon.csl.sri.com (Peter K. Boucher)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: T1000 sampled the kid too.
Date: 16 Apr 92 05:00:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: csl.1992Apr16.050018.20162
Reply-To: boucher@neon.csl.sri.com (Peter K. Boucher)
Organization: SRI International, Computer Science Lab, Menlo Park, CA

>     The T1000 only touched the guard's shoe?  Am I the only one who also
>saw him ram a finger through the guard's eye socket and out the back of his
>skull?  I'd imagine that's enough contact for a sample.  No need for particle
>physics here.  
>
>-John

He took the guard's from before killing him.  I think it's silly to assume
that the need to sample a victim implies that the sampling must be done with
a touch.  A visual sample is required to take the form, and an auditory sample
is needed to imitate the voice.

btw the T800's advantage over earlier models was the real skin, B-O, and bad
breath.  Model T1000 may look real, but it doesn't feel or smell real (I'd
guess).  Is it unstoppable by the weapons of the future, so that it's ability
to spend time infiltrating the humans is not as crucial (just needs to get
close enough to start blowing them away)?  

Also, since it's clear that it *was* possible to send the T1000 back in time,
why didn't it brick any futuristic weapons (guns, explosives, etc.) with it?
Couldn't, you say?  How about engulfing them before being sent?

Pete   (boucher@neon.csl.sri.com)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: gcagle@dracula.mentorg.com (Greg Cagle)
Subject: Re: Peter Sellers in The Party...
Originator: gcagle@dracula.mentorg.com
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 14:32:47 GMT
Organization: Mentor Graphics 
Keywords: 
Followup-To: 


In article <1992Apr7.081043.6689@cc.uow.edu.au>, dgdoe@cc.uow.edu.au (Douglas Doe) writes:
|> be126@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bob Powers) writes:
|> 
|> 
|> >Anyone remember seeing the movie "The Party"? I haven't seen
|> >it on TV for years, and it wasn't released on videotape as
|> >far as I can tell - my friends and I consider it a 'cult'
|> >filmbecause it is hilarious and it may never appear anywhere
|> >again...
|> 
|> >Then again, if you DO see it somewhere - don't miss it!
|> 
|> >For those of you who have seen it: "Bird - Dee Num Num!!"
|> 
|> It has been released on video in Canada.  A few friends and I rented
|> it when I was there 2 years ago!  It had a pink cover.  I haven't
|> checked if it has been released in Australia yet.
|> 
|> That film is one of my favorties...
|> 

It's been on the A & E (Arts and Entertainment) cable channel a few
times. It *is* hilarious in spots.

- Greg
-- 
Greg Cagle               "Nice boy, but about as sharp
Mentor Graphics           as a sack full of wet mice."
greg_cagle@mentorg.com
From: boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com (The fox so cunning and free)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: name that movie!
Date: 9 Apr 92 07:12:44 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation

In article <1992Apr9.050434.16215@trl.oz.au>, jbm@hal.trl.OZ.AU (Jacques Guy) writes...

}} Plot centers around a space ship to Mars that picks up a monster that
}} proceeds to wreak havoc on the crew on the way back to Earth.  [...]

} "5 millions years to Earth", I think -- 

Nope. As stated before, it's IT! THE TERROR FROM BEYOND SPACE.

FIVE MILLION YEARS TO EARTH was one of the Quatermass films, in which an
ancient spaceship is found buried under London.

} strange how the story reads like it was the granddaddy of "Alien", isn't it?

It *is* a "grandaddy" of ALIEN, and only one a handful that were. A similar
sf film is QUEEN OF BLOOD [a.k.a. PLANET OF BLOOD], with an Earth ship
picking up an alien woman who crash-landed on Mars, and who kills off the
crew one by one.

Other antecedents to ALIEN are NIGHT OF THE BLOOD BEAST (which had the
concept of the monster incubating embryos inside a human host) and DEMON
PLANET (which featured an expedition finding a derelict alien ship with
a skeletal pilot).

ALIEN was a far cry from being original.

-- 

	"Buster, this trip downriver has been truly special.
	 Downright Twainian in a Hitchcockian sort of way."


--- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC, "The Mill", Maynard, MA)

    boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com
From: km2a+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kenneth E. Mohnkern)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: comfort and joy
Date: 14 Apr 92 12:44:22 GMT
Organization: Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


On 13-Apr-92 in "comfort and joy" user Sharon Fenick@husc8.harv writes:
>	one fine winter night some months ago, i was sitting in
>my room and watching tv, when out of nowhere this excellent movie
>appeared on my telly.  has anyone else seen "comfort and joy" or 
>does anyone know if it is out on video anywhere, or even if there
>are any other movies of this ilk out there?
>	it was an incredibly funny movie, with all sorts of under-
>played and really awesome scenes.  it was a scottish film, i think,
>though i'm not sure exactly, and it involved a radio show host named
>dickie bird, his women, and the ice cream mafia.
> 
>	please, assurances that i didn't dream the whole thing on >my couch?

A film by Bill Forsythe, one of my favorite writers/directors. The same
guy who gave us:

 Gregory's Girl: The funniest teen-love story ever.
 Breaking In: Burt Reynolds as an aging thief. Great!
 Housekeeping: Christine Lahti as a wacky aunt taking care of her nieces.
 Local Hero: Buying a Scottish town to build an oil field on.

(I hope I haven't made any errors in these _very_general_ comments. As
always, feel free to correct where necessary.)

I must admit I liked all of these better than Comfort & Joy, but C&J was
a load of fun, too. It was probably just the phase of the moon or
something. 

    ken


#ken mohnkern # the graphics deli # the robotics institute #
              # carnegie mellon university # pittsburgh pa #
#   "It's not the thing you fling, but the fling itself."  #