HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: corleyj@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley )
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: Forging a World Dictatorship
Summary: Why _this_ planet?
Date: 11 Oct 92 19:30:05 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ


Taking over the world is a good idea, but why take over _this_
world?  It's all polluted!  Lets just blow this one to smithereens
and get the heck out of here.

On the other hand, world domination _would_ help blow the planet
to smithereens.  Though I don't think Siberia is the right place
to start.  What about all the downtime when we aren't propogating
our sinister, malevolent rule?  What will we do for fun?  No,
we've got to start in Southern Florida, or out on one of the
more polluted beaches in California.  THEN we go to Siberia and
get all the scientists and resources and stuff.

Yeah.  That's the ticket.

	Jason
	Ono-Sendai R&D
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: Psycho Kitten
Subject: Re: Summary of Ideas (was Re: list)
Summary: About Tesla... 
Originator: awatson@pecan.cns.udel.edu
Organization: The Eternal Order of Chaos 
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 00:45:50 GMT

In article <1992Oct14.210157.1295@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> locklin@titan.ucc.umass.edu () writes:
>> [summary of three main groups of flawed plans to destroy the earth]
>
>Damn it! Noone likes the Tesla-inspired idea of cracking the earths crust like
>a ripe melon?! 
>The way I see it, its not too complicated (although it may be difficult to keep
>the driving oscillations going in the later stages of disintigration), it
>would destroy all life, as there will be nowhere for the life to exist 
>(presumably the surface of the earth would be molten again after the process)
>& I have not heard any arguments, scientific or aesthetic, that this is not
>scientifically feasable.
>
>This takes care of all 3 categories. Now someone challenge me on this before
>I forget about it, or change schools or something! (I always work best with a
>good critic)
>
>-Scott (foaming at the mouth) Locklin


	Sorry to burst your bubble, but Tesla himself later stated that
his idea of cracking the earth apart like a convusing melon wouldn't
work.  He admitted that the oscillators that he invented would be destroyed
or ripped from their bases in the ground by the earthquakes they create.
He said that vibrating the earth apart wouldn't work because of the small
scale of the oscillator relative to the size of the planet.

	They could be used to cause massive earthquakes which could cause
considerable surface damage.  A series of well placed (and well timed)
oscillating engines could easily rip the Yellow River apart or make
the West Coast of America look like it's having epileptic seizures. =)
While a well executed running of Tesla's toys would cause massive
upheavels in the earth's crust, the resulting earthquakes, volcanos, mud    
slides and avalances would probably leave a few humans alive (and more
than a few of other life forms).

	It's a nice place to start from though... (one of my favorites)

	AMW
	aka Psycho Kitten




-- 

Psycho Kitten   \ zaphodb@brahms.udel.edu    \ Check my .plan \ Just a Grim
Angela M. Watson \ awatson@pecan.cns.udel.edu \ for more info  \ Reaper wannabe
From: tim@gold.iss.nus.sg (tim poston)
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: Atmospheric Destruction (was: Re: WHY?)
Date: 16 Oct 92 04:53:37 GMT
Reply-To: tim@iss.nus.sg (tim poston)
Organization: Institute of Systems Science, NUS, Singapore

In article <1992Oct14.134041.19380@abo.fi> MANDTBACKA@finabo.abo.fi (Mats Andtbacka Ktf92) writes:
>      Heat up the *sun* ?!? You don't go for second best, do you...
>Dropping planets into the darng thing: Sorry, unless I misremember
>Jupiter's only about a one-thousandth the size (and mass) of the sun -
>or was that a ten-thousandth? Enough zeroes to make the scheme
>pointless, though.

Maybe.  Look, the sun fluctuates in a pretty complicated way.
If this complication is `chaotic' it involves
sensitive dependence on initial unknowns
(sometimes called the butterfly effect),
so that small inputs can have very large effects.
This underlies some of the new work about the
surprising controllability of some chaotic systems.

So, if the sun's range of possible behaviour includes
a spell with the solar constant a few percentage points up,
it is probably possible to tweak it into that range
with a carefully controlled _small_ input,
over quite a lot of time; rather like the Tesla
scheme on the Earth, except that gets thrown off
by its own early effects.  Tweaking the Sun
with a fluctuating meson beam, say, from way outside
Mars orbit, you wouldn't have the same problem.

(I rather doubt if the behaviour currently reachable
includes enough heat to vaporize the Earth,
rather than just bake life off the surface.
Have to wait a few billion years.
Unless a nova is just barely possible?)

Of course, this would involve a much better model
of solar dynamics than we have right now:
can't even agree at present if the number of neutrinos
coming out of there says the inner fusion reaction's going out.

Support your local solar dynamicist!


Tim Poston

_____________________________________________________________________
    "Take no thought therefore for wars,
     and rumours of wars.
     The end of the world is within you."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: Alan@NXSci173a.mrs.umn.edu (Puffin)
Subject: Re: The End
Reply-To: kruegewa@cda.mrs.umn.edu
Organization: University of Minnesota - Morris
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 17:52:51 GMT

Jason D Corley  writes
[...]
>However, I am intrigued by the thought that a biological
>weapon powerful and adaptable enough to destroy all life
>on earth might _already exist_.  I say we pick one up
>at the military surplus stores when (if) the budget cuts
>come through.  Any CIA people spying on this group?

How about the NSA?  Ooops, now I'm in trouble...

Really, I just read about it in a magazine, honest!
--
   W. Alan "Puffin" Krueger  | >> fixed action set in motion doubting amnesia
  Univ of Minnesota, Morris  |    potion what to hide red carpet ride guessing
KRUEGEWA  @  CAB.MRS.UMN.EDU |    right << tIN oMEN sKINNY pUPPY
ALAN  @ NXSCI173.MRS.UMN.EDU | Listen to the U~90 Alternative!  KUMM 89.7 fm
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: knb@postman.hsn.no (KNUT ERIK BORGEN)
Subject: Doing nothing at all
Organization: Nordland College
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 12:26:58 GMT

I told a friend of mine about the idea of destroying the earth. He then 
imidiatly replied that we should do nothing. If we keep running it like now 
we are sure to be doomed anyway....

I myself have got a new idea...

We could start a new type of religion that would demand castration. (If it 
could appeal to youth it could be devestating.) Another way could be to make 
people to avoid sex. That would lead to lower bird rate, and maby in the end 
negative birth rate. (Then the humanity would die out eventually.)

At the end I got to tell you another suggestion made by my friend. (He     
was'nt very serious...)

If everybody got gay, humanity would die !

KEB


Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: fsgaw1@acad3.alaska.edu
Subject: Forging WD/defective plans
Organization: University of Alaska Fairbanks
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 18:47:49 GMT

	Why go to Sibera after Florida. The Russian already did the job for
us. Sibera is just a large Nuclear Waste dump, that is slowly seeping its
shit into the Artic Ocean. And what in Florida competes with the Tiger, how
about the Florida Black Panthar. there are only 50 or so left. I say the
best way to trash this planet is to start in the cities. Then release so
chemical or biological contaminate into the water system. Forget Nukes!! The
others will target unwanted areas. Nukes blow everthing to shit, including
yourselves eventually. With the other, you can make shop on a deserted Island
and wait for everyone else to die. And if any try to get on the Island.
"Boom!" (You get the picture.) One thing is clear I think I will find my own
island. Couldn't stand living with others of my type.
From: lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu (Cosma R. Shalizi)
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: Atmospheric Destruction (was: Re: WHY?)
Date: 10 Oct 1992 01:24:34 GMT
Organization: Vampire Research Group at Berkeley :)
NNTP-Posting-Host: tempest.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Oct9.093542.6958@abo.fi> MANDTBACKA@finabo.abo.fi (Mats Andtbacka Ktf92) writes:
>[Lucid summary of the proper use of CFCs and their problems deleted, along
  with a call for finding a better ozone-destroying catalyst.]
   But why? Think about this. Why do we - well, They, anyhow - want ozone?
To keep out ultraviolet and the like. Destroying ozone is all well and good,
but we could simply try overwhelming the ozone layer. Heat up the sun. Not
only do we start getting skin cancer, but we actually do get global warming,
and there'd be nothing the eco-hobbits could do about it.
   There are <modest cough> technical difficulties, but I'm sure something
could be arranged (drop Neptune or Uranus into the sun? Maybe Jupiter? Seed
the photosphere with muons so we get cold fusion? Is there an astrophysicist
in the house?)
	Cosma Rohilla Shalizi
	In Real Life: lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu
	larval physicist
	VP, Campus Crusade for Cthulhu (Berkeley)
THE STARS ARE RIGHT: CTHULHU IN '92! WHY SETTLE FOR THE LESSER EVIL?
"Don't think of it as a _bomb_, but a flash-bulb brighter than a 1000 suns..."
-- 
"Apart from hydrogen, the most common thing in the universe is stupidity."
-Harlan Ellison, _An Edge in My Voice_
From: lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu (Cosma R. Shalizi)
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: Doing Nothing at all(How about cannibalism)
Date: 10 Oct 1992 01:32:46 GMT
Organization: Vampire Research Group at Berkeley :)
NNTP-Posting-Host: tempest.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Oct9.153140.1@acad3.alaska.edu> fsgaw1@acad3.alaska.edu writes:
>	Heck, if we want to destroy the human race, why would we want
>to ruin our sex lives as the former writer suggested. Why don't we just eat
>each other. And if nobody will do that, make a machine that will get the job
>done nice, clean and effectively.
    Problem: The per annum population growth rate for this planet is now
about 3% - which is to say, 165 million a year. Can we _eat_ that many
people? If we want to reduce population, we'd need to eat, say, 200 million
per annum - that's a lot of long pig, kids. Besides, unless we can become a
global dictatorship and enforce our will upon the teeming multitudes, we'd
be, effectively, selecting for populations which refuse to practice
anthropophagy. (Still, with the help of - of all critters! - PETA, it may be
possible to take over the world - and then not only cannibalism, but many
other ways to Destroy the Earth (tm) become oh so very much easier.)

>Man's only enemy is his mind!! Get rid of that and all problem are solved.
    Hrrmph. If we didn't have minds, could we figure out how to destroy the
earth? No! Is destroying the earth good? Yes! Therefore, Mind is Good. Case
closed.
	Cosma Rohilla Shalizi
	In Real Life: lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu
	larval physicist

-- 
"Apart from hydrogen, the most common thing in the universe is stupidity."
-Harlan Ellison, _An Edge in My Voice_
From: bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Forging a World Dictatorship
Date: 10 Oct 92 15:47:26 GMT
Organization: Bowling Green State University

In 'Re: Doing nothing at all' Cosma brings up a _very_ interesting point,
that it would be beneficial for us to establish a world dictatorship.  This is
something that I've often considered, and I've come up with a few semi-workable
ideas, mostly revolving around nukes.  Does anybody out there have any ideas
that might enable a few wicked men to take over the world?

Suggestions appreciated,
--Joshua
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: kruegewa@cda.mrs.umn.edu (Puffin)
Subject: Re: The End
Organization: University of Minnesota - Morris
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 17:53:16 GMT

KNUT ERIK BORGEN writes
>Hi Folks!
>
>I was reading this conferance and was fasinated by the tecnical question of 
>how to destroy the earth compleatly. I do love it, but the question tickled 
>my brain, so here is some suggestions:
[suggestions]

Actually, my favorite scenario was a short story that I don't remeber the name  
to.  This hobbyist builds his own rocket ship, powered by an iron oxidizer.   
Yes, that's right.  This fellow found a catalyst that speeds up iron oxidation  
to a phenominal rate, so high that he could fuel a rocket engine with it.  He  
launches and makes it into orbit.  But, alas for everyone else on the planet,  
some of this catalyst drips out.  It starts an iron fire that burns so hot that  
it propagates across the ENTIRE planet, turning the surface of the earth in to  
a large rust and ash pile.  Whatta way to go...
--
   W. Alan "Puffin" Krueger  | >> fixed action set in motion doubting amnesia
  Univ of Minnesota, Morris  |    potion what to hide red carpet ride guessing
KRUEGEWA  @  CAB.MRS.UMN.EDU |    right << tIN oMEN sKINNY pUPPY
ALAN  @ NXSCI173.MRS.UMN.EDU | Listen to the U~90 Alternative!  KUMM 89.7 fm
From: corleyj@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley )
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Sterilization of Planet
Summary: Biological warfare/whole planet
Date: 7 Oct 92 06:04:18 GMT
Distribution: alt.destroy.the.earth
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Re: Sterilization of whole planet, waiting around for
human extinction.

Very good idea: makes it easier for the genetic engineers
who are going to have to design this virus/bacteria.  Also,
if we make a few others for some crucial species to go with
us, we can upset the food chain enough to extinctify (is that
a word?  Should be.) the whole planet, eventually.

A question though, for any biologists out there:
Assume you want to upset the ecological cycle of predator
and prey THE MOST.  You have the power to make _one_ species
extinct.  Who is it?\

	Jason
	Our Reporter on the Hideous Plane of Leng
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: MANDTBACKA@finabo.abo.fi (Mats Andtbacka Ktf92)
Subject: Re: Atmospheric Destruction (was: Re: WHY?)
Organization: Unorganized Usenet Postings UnInc.
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 11:48:25 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.23

In <1bkti7INNj19@agate.berkeley.edu> lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu writes:

>      I wasn't thinking so much of giving it more fuel, as of putting a 
>  fairly large mass at the center of the thing to increase the gravitational
>  pressure and drive up the fusion reaction rate.

      Oh... Didn't think of that idea. Still, as you say, we'd need a
*lot* of mass; compressing it to neutronium (or further) would probably
be a good idea, I think it would start a chain reaction by increasing
fusion rate locally first, and then eating outwards. One problem: how do
you *keep* it compressed (assuming the total mass isn't too great) while
you move it into the sun?

>  What heating up the Sun would do is make it put out more
>  ultraviolet, so that even if the ozone layer was at full strength more UV
>  would get through, leading to skin cancer, mutations, et cetera.

      Good point, but I still think destroying the ozone layer would do
the same thing with less effort.

>     Remember that water vapor has the tendency to form clouds, which have a
>  high albedo and reflect light back into space, rather than using it to
>  steam-cook the planet. Temperature went down after the Dinosaur Killer. We

      Again oh... Mustv'e had my brains on standby when I wrote that
post. But a global winter might work too, if we could make it last long
enough... Clouds probably wouldn't do the trick, I must agree.

      What I was *really* thinking of was to start a heating chain
reaction, resulting in something more or less like Venutian climate.
This would hinge on the amount of CO2 bound in the oceans, though: I
don't know if there's enough of it to keep the reaction going, or if the
whole thing'll just level off when the oceans run out of the stuff.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 The above opinions are *NOT*, except if and when otherwise explicitly stated,
        those of anybody and / or anything with any brains whatsoever.
  Mats Andtbacka is really: MANDTBACKA@finabo.abo.fi (or ABOVAX::MANDTBACKA).
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: TARZAN
Subject: NOTHING..
Organization: Bell-Northern Research
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 13:46:41 GMT

IT IS ALWAYZ EASIER TO DESTROY THAN TO IMPROVE.  WHY DO SO MANY GIVE UP SO
SOON?  NOT MANY HAVE THE GUTS TO SEEK IMPROVEMENT.  (THOUGH I DO UNDERSTAND
THAT MOST OF THE ARTICLES IN THIS GROUP ARE JUST CRAZY FUN.) I HOPE... 
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: locklin@titan.ucc.umass.edu ()
Subject: Re: Forging WD/defective plans
Organization: Campus Crusade for Cthulhu
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 00:55:14 GMT
X-Posted-From: titan.ucc.umass.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <1992Oct12.104749.1@acad3.alaska.edu> fsgaw1@acad3.alaska.edu writes:
>	Why go to Sibera after Florida. The Russian already did the job for
>us. Sibera is just a large Nuclear Waste dump, that is slowly seeping its
>shit into the Artic Ocean. And what in Florida competes with the Tiger, how
>about the Florida Black Panthar. there are only 50 or so left. I say the
>best way to trash this planet is to start in the cities. Then release so
>chemical or biological contaminate into the water system. Forget Nukes!! The
>others will target unwanted areas. Nukes blow everthing to shit, including
>yourselves eventually. With the other, you can make shop on a deserted Island
>and wait for everyone else to die. And if any try to get on the Island.
>"Boom!" (You get the picture.) One thing is clear I think I will find my own
>island. Couldn't stand living with others of my type.
>

I know what you mean; I hate closet enviornmentalists myself.

Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: locklin@titan.ucc.umass.edu ()
Subject: Re: Doing nothing at all
Organization: Campus Crusade for Cthulhu
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 01:10:52 GMT
X-Posted-From: titan.ucc.umass.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <1992Oct9.170657.1@opie.bgsu.edu> bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:

>By the way, I listen to industrial for breakfast, too.  How about the rest of
>you?

Campus Crusade for Cthulhu Breakfast menu:
Einsturzen Neubatten
Soviet France
Nurse With Wound
Throbbing Gristle
Wagner's opera
From: bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: Doing nothing at all
Date: 9 Oct 92 21:06:57 GMT
Organization: Bowling Green State University

No great ideas here, just a response to an earlier statement that 'If we all
became gay, humanity would die.'

Has anybody here read the mission earth series by L. Ron Hubbard?  I think that
that was Rockecenter's idea for controlling population.  Charming little story.

By the way, I listen to industrial for breakfast, too.  How about the rest of
you?

Gods, here we are -- gods, here we are,
--Joshua
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu
Subject: Re: No looking at your neighbors' papers
Organization: Bowling Green State University
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 03:26:02 GMT

Q: What's wrong when an eco-fuck says:
>I'm an environmentalist...
and the person he is arguing with says:
>[paraphrased] I'm an environmentalist too...
and they are posting to alt.destroy.the.earth?

A:  They are in the wrong newsgroup! Yeah! Wrong fucking newsgroup! Spouting
eco-fucking-shit on the _wrong_ newsgroup.  Send them away, make them go home,
leave us alone, eco-fucks!  Go home and plant a tree!  Fuck a baby seal!  Post
to alt.save.the.earth!  Hahahahahah, yayayayayayayay! Leave us alone!

--Joshua
BC "fucking" 205CS@opie.bgsu.edu    jallen@andy.bgsu.edu
From: jseaver@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Jason John Seaver)
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: WHY?
Date: 10 Oct 1992 00:23:44 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <1992Oct9.214122.5765@news.iastate.edu> pholland@iastate.edu (Paul J Hollander) writes:
>In article <WMPERRY.92Oct8103133@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> wmperry@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (William Michael Perry) writes:
>>>LET ME GUESS.  YOU ALL LISTEN TO HEAVY METAL FOR BREAKFAST.  NO OFFENSE...  
>>
>>No, actually for breakfast I prefer to listen to Mozart.  And if I am
>>in a bad mood I'll listen to Beethoven's 'Wellington's Victory'.  Or
>>if I am in a _really_ bad mood I will listen to public enemy :)
>>
>> (Deleted)
>
>The 1812 Overture gets my blood moving.  Though I guess you could call that
>heavy metal.  All those cannon....   8^)

	I, myself, eat food for breakfast.
							-Jay


Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: Alan@NXSci173a.mrs.umn.edu (Puffin)
Subject: Re: WHY?
Reply-To: kruegewa@cda.mrs.umn.edu
Organization: University of Minnesota - Morris
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 17:57:45 GMT

TARZAN writes
>LET ME GUESS.  YOU ALL LISTEN TO HEAVY METAL FOR BREAKFAST.  NO OFFENSE...  
None taken.  But I don't.  I don't listen to anything for breakfast, as I  
normally do not HAVE a traditional breakfast--my tummy doesn't like me, I  
guess...

Actually, I'm more partial to Industrial than metal.
--
   W. Alan "Puffin" Krueger  | >> fixed action set in motion doubting amnesia
  Univ of Minnesota, Morris  |    potion what to hide red carpet ride guessing
KRUEGEWA  @  CAB.MRS.UMN.EDU |    right << tIN oMEN sKINNY pUPPY
ALAN  @ NXSCI173.MRS.UMN.EDU | Listen to the U~90 Alternative!  KUMM 89.7 fm
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: WHY?
From: swoodwar@zeus.calpoly.edu (Null Cypher)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 23:12:00 GMT
Organization: VoidSoft Ink.

TARZAN had the unmitigated audacity to say:
>LET ME GUESS.  YOU ALL LISTEN TO HEAVY METAL FOR BREAKFAST.  NO OFFENSE...  

That's right Pink Boy!  I am so far up the evolutionary ladder that I no
longer need food for sustenance!  I obtain my energy from sound waves!
I'll be glad to tell you how I accomplished this great feat of evolution,
at ABSOLUTELY NO COST TO YOU!!  Just send me $20
-- 
------------------  fjbbqjne ng qrzrgre qbg pnycbyl qbg rqh  ------------------
   Gur bayl checbfr bs guvf fvtangher vf gb trg crbcyr gb ebg-guvegrra vg...
                 Qvq V rire fnl vg jnf tbvat gb or jbegujuvyr?
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: I'm your man
From: swoodwar@zeus.calpoly.edu (Null Cypher)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 23:18:09 GMT
Organization: VoidSoft Ink.

Patrick Pearse Gallagher <pg23+@andrew.cmu.edu> had the unmitigated audacity to say:
>	I've had plans in the works to form a world dictatorship for quite some
>time now.  I have a few henchmen, and this looks like a good place to
>get some more.  Is anyone with me?  I promise once I take over, I will
>destroy the earth.
>
>----Patrick

CAN I BE IN YOUR CONSPIRACY I'LL SEND YOU $20

P.S. CAN I HAVE AN ISLAND IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC WHEN WE TAKE OVER THE WORLD
-- 
------------------  fjbbqjne ng qrzrgre qbg pnycbyl qbg rqh  ------------------
   Gur bayl checbfr bs guvf fvtangher vf gb trg crbcyr gb ebg-guvegrra vg...
                 Qvq V rire fnl vg jnf tbvat gb or jbegujuvyr?
From: bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: TARZAN and de5
Date: 8 Oct 92 19:34:35 GMT
Organization: Bowling Green State University

TARZAN -- Of course we're just having a little bit of fun.  What could be more
fun than destroying the earth?  

Now to address the issue of De5:
De5 says that the earth cannot be destroyed by man and says:
>Simply provide a detailed scenario for the destruction of the planet by man...

Sooooo... Isn't that precisely what we are trying to do here?  Give us time,
give us time... And besides, your argument can go either way.  Prove to me that
it is impossible to destroy the earth.  You are postulating that it is 
impossible for man to destroy the earth, because we haven't told you a way to 
do it yet.  Flawed......
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth