HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: clark@netcom.com (Sue Clark)
Subject: Re: Bishop:Too good For Xmen?
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 92 06:29:56 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

<ECN101@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>Is it my imagination or does it seem like everyone is getting on Bishop's case?
>Can anyone tell me why the rest of the Gold Team are treating Bishop like a rav
>ing Pyschopath?

>It seems to me that his methods, albiet a tad too rough, work well enough.  May
>be it's time for bishop to join X-Force.

Seeing as how I don't read X-Force, I'm all for the switch. :)

Sue


-- 
-----------------
Sue Clark
clark@netcom.com
From: lazarus@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Brigadier Stuart's name
Date: 9 Sep 92 06:57:12 GMT
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: venture.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <1992Sep4.192404.20102@news.iastate.edu>, mwbutler@iastate.edu (Tritor) writes:
>Just to confirm your comment, her name was AlysANDE in earlier issues.  Another
>of the many discontinuities found in the comic world.

Maybe a screwup on the letterer's part, then?

>Mike B

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
The 'Cats WILL rule in '92!
"You're too young and I'm too well hung..." -- Spinal Tap
Organization: Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 11:00:12 -0400 
From: "Michael J. Keating" <mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Romita -- not Buscema

Yes, the artist was Romita.  I've just been using the wrong name to
describe the art I liked.  Thanks.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: mmunoz@vxcrna.cern.ch (MUNOZ,MARC./DG)
Subject: Re: Cable is Nathan Summers?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 10:44:00 GMT

First, one remark: My english is not very good, so maybe someone could 
misunderstoodme.
I don't want to say that Cable is Doulglock (Warloug?). The powers are different
, etc... (also, I don't read X-force, so I don't know so much about Cable's 
powers). I wanted to say that the idea is enough wild and stupid to be used in
the current X-Books. The ideas is: (1) Cable shoot at Xavier -> X-men makes an
 autopsia of Doug -> Doug resurected as Douglock -> Douglock becomes Cable ->
 Goto (1).
            MArc
From: ba446@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Todd M. Hanson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: The new X-Force and U.X-Men
Date: 6 Sep 1992 09:13:13 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: ba446@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Todd M. Hanson)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox) says:

>  Now if only they'd follow up the last panel of the X-tinction
>Agenda...I want Doug and Warlock back!


Could you clarify this please?  What did the 'last panel' show, and how 
does it suggest that Doug and Warlock could come back? (please,please,please
let them bring back Doug!)

Speaking of Doug..  Waaaaay back in NM (I have no idea of the issue number)
they did a story where Doug dreamed that he was infected with the techno(?)
virus, and in turn infected the rest of the team.  After waking up, they
showed a closeup of (an eye?) which showed the beginnings of the virus. Was
this ever followed up on?

Todd

-- 
* Todd Hanson                              ba446@cleveland.freenet.edu  *
*                                                                       *
*     "No woman's worth a bullet between the eyes.. "                   *
*          "Depends on who's eyes.. and which woman."    'Bugsy'        *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: dv52151@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Axly)
Subject: Re: (More) proof Cable is Nathan Summers (PLOT SPOILER)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 16:12:41 GMT

donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald) writes:

>mark rieker <MJR127@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>>      Well, as if you needed it, here's some semi-concrete proof that Cable is
>>   Nathan Summers, in one form or another....

>>      WARNING:  I give out a (rough) plotline for the X-cutioners song
>>                storyline. No secrets, but if you don't want it get out now

>>                (ooh, what a dangler!)
























>>          4) The climax comes inside the vortex (does it ever :) ) BUT

>>             - The only ones who are able to go into the vortex are:
>>               Cyclops, Marvel Woman, Stryfe, Cable and Havok! (Hmmmm..)

>>          5) So what do these 5 have in common?  Could it be......

>>             SATAN ?!?    No, maybe......

>>             They're all related?  Maybe! Tune in next week......

>But they're not all related, at least not by genetic means... Scott, Havok, 
>Cable and Stryfe could be, if the latter two are actually Nathan Summers in 
>one form or another, but Jean is merely Scott's intended... there's no genetic
>connection there... So, am I confused, or missing something obvious??

Gee, maybe she's his MOM?   

Axly
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: mcmahan@cs.unca.edu (Scott McMahan -- Genesis mailing list owner)
Subject: Re: The new X-Force and U.X-Men
Organization: University of North Carolina at Asheville
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 18:53:07 GMT

Todd M. Hanson (ba446@cleveland.Freenet.Edu) wrote:
: Could you clarify this please?  What did the 'last panel' show, and how 
: does it suggest that Doug and Warlock could come back? (please,please,please
: let them bring back Doug!)

NO!!!!!!! Let him stay dead. The Marvel Universe of 1992 is not a 
place for the NM: they had deep plots, character development, sensitivity, and
were likeable. All he'd do now is ...
: 
: Speaking of Doug..  Waaaaay back in NM (I have no idea of the issue number)
: they did a story where Doug dreamed that he was infected with the techno(?)
: virus, and in turn infected the rest of the team.  After waking up, they
: showed a closeup of (an eye?) which showed the beginnings of the virus. Was
: this ever followed up on?

...get transmuted into Warlock II and fight & kill people.

Doug's transmode virus was never followed up on -- that was one of the
*LAST* Claremont issues. Kinda gives you a feeling of where CC was going
to take it.

I suspect Doug *wanted* the virus -- he needed a non-wimpy power, and
being able to interface that completely with machines...maybe not even
on a conscious level, but he wanted it...

Scott

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Subject: Re: Hellions ( Re: What happened) ?
Reply-To: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 07:09:44 GMT

In article <184asnINN31s@maico.ksu.ksu.edu> lazarus@maico.ksu.ksu.edu writes:
>
>In article <1992Sep3.042156.15251@morgan.ucs.mun.ca>, cwelsh@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Craig Welsh  8823239) writes:
>>Now the curious thing about this is that I could have sworn that Empath
>>died in the UX issue that the rest of the Hellions died. Mayve Fabian
>>forgot to check up on something.
>
>If I remember correctly, Empath DID survive.  His quote was that he could no 
>longer "feel" the White Queen when SHE died.  But I can't recall his actually 
>having died himself.  (Then again, I COULD be wrong...)

  He didn't die in UXmen 281, but I thought that in 282 FitzRoy
captured "all" the Hellions (the pictures showed about twice as many
as had been in any appearance of the team before) and killed them in
the process of bringing Bishop through (lousy trade).  Now, the problems
are twofold:

1) Empath, in one of his two lines in 281, stopped a fight between
Iceman and Beef (I think) with the line (approximately) "Stop, you
_estupidos_!  Empath says stop!"  That is totally out of character for
him--he would never interfere in a fight unless he were personally
threatened, and even if he were to, he wouldn't scream at people, he'd
just control them.

2) Empath shouldn't have been at the Hellfire Club anyway.  The last
time anyone saw him, he was in Nova Roma with Amara, and he definitely
wasn't around at the Hellions' last appearance (New Warriors #10).

3) [I lied].  Empath is the most interesting [imho] of any of the
Hellions, and it would be really stupid to let him die so trivially.
(Of course, it was really stupid to kill _ANY_ of the Hellions so
trivially, but I really can't care too strongly about most of them.)

So, hopefully, Fabian will just decide to ignore those two lines in
UXmen 281, or perhaps declare that it was some other Empath, not
Manuel de la Rocha, who also had emotion-sensing powers, and who just
happened to also speak Spanish as his native language.

Jonathan Lennox
jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
From: sl859@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Most violent mutant
Date: 15 Sep 92 13:41:57 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1992Sep15.163920.16905@cs.unca.edu>, mcmahan@cs.unca.edu (Scott McMahan -- Genesis mailing list owner) writes:
> WHITAKER JASON (whijv2@cspyr1.cs.adfa.oz.au) wrote:
> 
> : Who is the most violent mutant?
> 
> Rob Liefield.
> 
> 
> Scott

	Here, Here!
				Amen to that!
			
					wReam...
				     Ultimate Ninja!

P.S.  Trying to shove more and more sensless and gratuitous violence
into one posting than any other!  Read the Ultimate Ninja saga!  :) 

Organization: Freshman, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 18:26:58 -0400 
From: "Carey D. Clevenger" <cc79+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: cable/stryfe/mr.sinister
	<18v8hiINNjat@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>

Since we are talking about CABLE/STRYFE...

Take a GOOD, LONG LOOK at that cybernetic eye of theirs...


What are the CHANCES that they were created by MOJO?

Just a theory.
From: lazarus@interceptor.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Wolverine
Date: 11 Sep 1992 00:54:41 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: interceptor.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <IefqJV600WBO82mp8d@andrew.cmu.edu>, "Michael J. Keating" <mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>The only thing about Gambit is that so far only one artist can really draw him --
>Lee.

I gotta disagree with this.  Art Thibert has a style that's as good, and probably
BETTER than Jim Lee's stuff.  (Not that Lee isn't GOOD...)  I think he's doing an
excellent job in his rendering of Gambit, Rogue, Cyclops... the whole team.  And,
hopefully, Mr. Thibert will be around a LOT longer than Lee/Portacio/MacFarlane/
Keown/Silvestri/Valentino/andlastbutnotleastLiefeld...

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
In one week the 'Cats go hunting for Grizzlies...
"Do you live around here often?" -- Steven Wright -- "I Have a Pony"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: whijv2@cspyr1.cs.adfa.oz.au (WHITAKER JASON)
Subject: Superman to join the X-MEN!!!!!!!
Organization: Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, Australia
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 08:27:10 GMT

Yes that's right folks. Superman will be joining the X-men
in a couple of months.

That's why they are killing him off in the DC universe, so he can
transfer to the X-men.:)

Should be good huh?

The Sneaky One
From: v106qjh9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BIFTAD HOMESLICE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: cable/stryfe/mr.sinister
Date: 13 Sep 92 00:49:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


	Is it possible that Styfe is/was a clone of Cable.  Mr. S is known
for that kind of stuff, ya know.  Just a theory.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
!									       !
!				BIFTAD HOMESLICE			       !
!------------------------------------------------------------------------------!
!     "That is why I have failed where others have suceeded"		       !
!		-Inspector Jacques Cousteauz				       !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: whijv2@cspyr1.cs.adfa.oz.au (WHITAKER JASON)
Subject: Bishop vs change of team
Organization: Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, Australia
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 08:34:09 GMT

Yes, I think Bishop should join X-Force.

He has the right mentality for them.}:>

Maybe they should start a new comic called X-Psychos.

Members: Cable, Wolverine, Bishop, Sabretooth, Shatterstar, Magneto...


Anybody wanna add anymore to this wonderfully bloodthirsty team?


The Sneaky One
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: dv52151@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Axly)
Subject: Re: Scott Lobdell is still a moron...X-Men 294 spoilers
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 01:23:13 GMT

kbos@carina.unm.edu (Kurt Bose "of Biscayzee") writes:


>Sorry, can't see that the usage of "parameter" is bad.  "Perimeter" may refer 
>to a physical boundary, but "parameter" in this case would read as though
>Bishop feels that they couldn't keep security at necessary protective levels.
> That the constancy of their vigilance was less than desirable, rather than
the physical boundary of their protection. Seems perfectly fine.

*Grin* It doesn't really matter whether it was a perimeter or a parameter,
Cable still shot the bald guy. Let's face it, if someone can move through time,
they shouldn't have a hard time killing someone. That, to me, is the obvious
giveaway that it wasn't Cable (even though it would make a better story if
it were Cable). He wouldn't have to shoot Baldy there, he could simply find
out where he's been and bodyslide in, shoot him and leave. Some time when
the X Men weren't around seems reasonable.."Oh, Gee, the X-Men were spotted
in Afghanistan last month on day X. Let me hop into the X mansion and pop
the old guy. "

Axly

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: Re: revitalization
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 23:48:22 GMT

In article <kefI0gG00iUx08_Ld8@andrew.cmu.edu> "Michael J. Keating" <mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>Well, we can all go on lamenting the departure of Claremont ( in which I
>have also participated), or we can look forward to the new team that we
>will be getting soon. Seriously, folks, do you think that this one can
>stay around too long?  The best Claremont issues - 190's-200's, had
>something to do with the art of Buscema.  I have always thought (meaning
>no disrespect to Jim Lee, whom I think is just as good) that Buscema
>captured the spirit of the X-Men better than almost anyone (Art Adams,
>Jim Lee).  It would be great to see him return!  Maybe some lobbying
>could do it, although I have no idea where he is currently pencilling.

Wasn't the artist durring the 190's-200's John Romita Jr.?

I'm pretty sure that was him.

------SCAVENGER

P.S. COMING SOON: THE CLAREMONT FILES 


-- 
KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: cfalls@gucis.cit.gu.edu.au (Craig Falls)
Subject: Re: Scott Lobdell is still a moron...X-Men 294 spoilers
Organization: Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 04:46:25 GMT

dv52151@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Axly) writes:

>*Grin* It doesn't really matter whether it was a perimeter or a parameter,
>Cable still shot the bald guy. Let's face it, if someone can move through time,
>they shouldn't have a hard time killing someone. That, to me, is the obvious
>giveaway that it wasn't Cable (even though it would make a better story if
>it were Cable). He wouldn't have to shoot Baldy there, he could simply find
>out where he's been and bodyslide in, shoot him and leave. Some time when
>the X Men weren't around seems reasonable.."Oh, Gee, the X-Men were spotted
>in Afghanistan last month on day X. Let me hop into the X mansion and pop
>the old guy. "

>Axly

	Ever thought that Cable made such a public assination, after the
	prof had made a speech uniting all people (e.g. Martin Luther
	King Jr.) tho make a martyr out of him.  And espically how 
	after the seeming assination he called himself, the man who
	saved tomorrow (or something to this effect).  Perhaps it was
	necessary for Prof X to die inorder to unite mutants and normal
	people.

	What you you others think about this, and where did you find out
	about the transmode virus, and is this true.

				- Later


  Craig Falls - Griffith University, Australia - cfalls@gucis.cit.gu.edu.au
--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--=
	
	"Inevitably gentleman ... Hulk will smash!"
			
				- The New Incredible Hulk
					Spider - Man #20
	
--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: 11telliott@gallua.gallaudet.edu (Zarathustra)
Subject: Re: Favorites
Organization: Gallaudet University
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 04:44:02 GMT

Character: Phoenix/Jean Grey. She has the potential to be a great character due
to the duality of her nature. I.E., Dark Phoenix and Phoenix, or Jean Grey the
Mahvel Girl, brings up a lot of interesting possibilities, akin to that lady in
Doom Patrol with the multiple personalities. ;) The worst: Wolverine. He's
overexposed. 'Nuff said.

Storyline: Magneto saga (X-Men 112) Alpha Flight (X-Men 109 and 120/121) And of
course, the Dark Phoenix saga. The worst: The future storyline introduced in
X-Men #141-142, for it really made the mess that characterizes X-Men today.

Writers: Chris Claremont from X-Men #94 to #143. After that, he went downhill.
:( As for the others, there isn't any but Chris.

Artists: No question: Neal Adams. You haven't lived until you've seen his work
on the early X-Men issues. John Byrne is a close second, due to his
contribution to the story as well as artwork. Dave Cockrum comes to mind, also,
mainly from #94 to 107. Jim Lee's art is awesome, as well, but I haven't seen
his work on the X-Men. (No, I haven't bought a single issue of X-crement for 5
years now.) The worst: Who? Anyone care to add?

Todd Elliott
11TELLIOTT@GALLUJ (Bitnet)
11TELLIO@GALLUX.GALLAUDET.EDU (Internet)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: wntrmute@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (August Paul Yang)
Subject: Re: Spider-Man is joining the X-Men!!
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 02:45:32 GMT

In article <AefrwSi00WB_Qn9pQw@andrew.cmu.edu> Gregory James Legowski <gl11+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>One of the major plots in the X-books is the "mutant hatred"/prejudice stuff,
>right?  Well, how does the average "everyday" person in the Marvel Universe
>know who's a mutant and who's not?  How is Joe Schmoe on the corner supposed
>to know that Spider-Man, for example, got his powers from being bitten and
>isn't a mutant himself?  Marvel writers seem to ignore the possibilities
>here -- a non-mutant hero who gets the same treatment as the mutants because
>people can't tell the difference...  For that matter I think the entire mutant
>hatred thing isn't done very well anyway, but that's another subject entirely

That's just the point.  The mutants are feared because you can't tell who
could be one and who couldn't.  The "heros" who do not suffer from mutant
hysteria either do not have intrinsic powers, like Nomad, or already have
a well established reputation, like Spiderman.  I don't have any idea what
would happen to a suddenly new hero with intrinsic powers since I haven't
seen one in a pretty long time.

wntrmute@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu
August Paul Yang
.sig mutated and ran away.
From: jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Lois London and the xbooks
Date: 14 Sep 92 16:33:12 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Sep14.152915.20741@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER) writes:

>Lois London is Allison (Dazzler) Blair's half sister (same mom, different
>dad). Dazzler learned about her sister during the last year of DAZZLER's own
>book (just before it was cancelled).  Her sister was struggling with an
>identity crisis of her own (Daz was juggling the idea of super-hero vs.
>singing career).  Lois was 19 years old and during the final few issues, her
>own mysterious mutant abilities began manifesting.  She was scared by a cat
>(Daz's I think) which jumped out of the dark at Lois, who stuck out her hands
>to protect herself.  In doing so her power manifested and where she touched
>the cat's face it mutated it, disfiguring it so the cat could not breathe. If
>I remember right, she then disposed of the cat before Allison came home (Lois
>was temporarily living with Daz).  Daz never found out what happend to her
>kitty.  Later, Lois was walking down a backstreet and was attacked by a
>vagabond who, I think, really just wanted a handout, but she was scare and
>pushed him away.  Her powers manifested again when she touched his face, which
>caused it to melt and disfigure.  The man collapsed and Lois was horrified as
>she watched him grope and struggle (he no longer possessed a mouth or nose,
>per se), and died.  She was last shown running down a lonely dark avenue into
>the night.

>I wonder why Daz doen't find out whatever happend to her.

She joined the Xmen just before they went undercover in Aussie.
Then she got amnesia from the Seige Perilous.

Don't really know what she's been up to since.  I'm sorta surprised
that she hasn't paid Guide a visit. (at least a phone call...)

			Jamus Willer
{the opinions above are probably NOT those of
 anyone at all}
From: gt6223b@prism.gatech.EDU (Jerry B. Ray)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Gambit
Date: 10 Sep 92 20:51:39 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <IefqJV600WBO82mp8d@andrew.cmu.edu> mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael J. Keating) writes:
>The only thing about Gambit is
>that so far only one artist can really draw him -- Lee.

I'm glad i'm not the only one who has noticed this phenomenon.  I'm not sure
exactly what the problem is, but it seems to be that everyone else draws
his hair like a 'high top fade' or a long flattop or something.  The new
guy on UXMen (Peterson?) did a fair job, though.  Is Terry Austin the 
permanent inker on the book now?  I guess i can tolerate their art, if the
last issue is any indication.

JRjr

-- 
'Hear the tale of a fallen people, destined to wander their broken land.
Their eyes are vacant, full of empty meaning, and what they're missing they
just don't understand.  Beyond the dark horizon, out where the people are
crying, a Morningstar will be rising, rising to show us the way...' Whiteheart
From: lazarus@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Hulk to Join the X-Men!!
Date: 12 Sep 1992 01:51:23 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: venture.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <1992Sep11.152004.1@woods.ulowell.edu>, lombardif@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
>So if we can't laugh at comic, what CAN we laugh at??

George Bush!

>
>-The Viking

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
In one week the 'Cats go hunting for Grizzlies...
"Do you live around here often?" -- Steven Wright -- "I Have a Pony"