HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
content-length: 2415
Approved-By:  "Vasanthan S. Dasan" <Vasanthan.Dasan@CENTRAL.SUN.COM>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores
Date:         Sun, 10 Jan 1993 03:40:42 MST
Reply-To:     "Vasanthan S. Dasan" <Vasanthan.Dasan@Central.Sun.COM>
From:         "Vasanthan S. Dasan" <Vasanthan.Dasan@Central.Sun.COM>
Subject:      England vs Indian Cricket Board President's XI (Lucknow, India,
              Jan10)

    Mike Gatting's 73rd first class century lifted England to 269 for
seven on the final day of their three-day match against an Indian
Board President's XI on Sunday.  The 38-year-old former England
captain, back after a two-and-a-half year ban for touring South Africa
with a rebel side, cracked 11 fours and one six in his four and a half
hour total of 115.  He was finally bowled by Maninder Singh while
going for a sweep.

   At lunch, John Emburey was yet to open his account after facing
eight balls, while night watchman Phillip Defreitas was continuing a
fine innings on 36, having hit five fours and one six.  Left arm
spinner Maninder Singh and off spinner Rajesh Chauhan took two wickets
each.  Maninder Singh also got rid of Graeme Hick (12) while Chauhan
struck twice in his first over, claiming Neil Fairbrother (2) and
Chris Lewis (0) with his first and fourth deliveries.

Board President's XI first innings

   S.S. Bhave c Stewart c Lewis .......... 1
   N.S. Sidhu c Gatting b Emburey ....... 36
   V.G. Kambli retd hurt ................ 61
   A. Sharma c Gatting b Taylor .......... 0
   N.R. Mongia b Taylor ................. 55
   R. Dravid st Stewart b Gooch ......... 27
   R. Chauhan c Stewart b Taylor ......... 0
   Maninder Singh b Gooch ............... 15
   S.A. Ankola c Gooch b Taylor .......... 3
   P.S. Viadya b Taylor ................. 13
   N.D. Hirwani not out .................. 1
   Extras (b2, lb6, w1, nb2) ............ 11
   Total (9 wkts, 76.4 overs) .......... 223

   Fall: 1-1, 2-105, 3-176, 4-178, 5-178, 6-197, 7-201, 8-219, 9-223

   Bowling

   Defreitas 20-5-59-0, Lewis 11-2-35-1, Emburey 14-4-44-1,
   Taylor 15.4-4-46-5, Tufnell 11-1-29-0, Gooch 5-3-2-2


 England first innings

   Gooch st Mongia b Hirwani ........... 77
   Gatting b Maninder Singh ........... 115
   Stewart lbw b Hirwani ................ 4
   Smith lbw b Hirwani .................. 1
   Defreitas batting ................... 36
   Hick lbw Maninder Singh ............. 12
   Faibrother b Chauhan ................. 2
   Lewis b Chauhan ...................... 0
   Emburey batting ...................... 0
   Extras (b16, lb6) ................... 22
   Total (for seven wickets) .......... 269

   Fall: 1-131, 2-135, 3-164, 4-226, 5-252, 6-265, 7-265

   Bowling

   Vaidya 10-1-31-0, Ankola 16-5-35-0, Chauhan 12-4-40-2,
   Maninder Singh 24-7-69-2, Hirwani 22-2-72-3

===
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
content-length: 2437
Approved-By:  "Vasanthan S. Dasan" <Vasanthan.Dasan@CENTRAL.SUN.COM>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores
Date:         Sat, 9 Jan 1993 17:53:55 MST
Reply-To:     "Vasanthan S. Dasan" <Vasanthan.Dasan@Central.Sun.COM>
From:         "Vasanthan S. Dasan" <Vasanthan.Dasan@Central.Sun.COM>
Subject:      England vs Indian Cricket Board President's XI (Lucknow, India,
              Jan 9)

   England were locked in a battle of the bowlers on Saturday, after a
flying start to their first innings against the Board President's XI
suddenly ground to a halt.  Paceman Paul Taylor wrapped up the home
team's innings with five wickets on his England debut, dismissing them
soon after lunch for 223.

   But after skipper Graham Gooch and Mike Gatting blasted the
tourists to an unbeaten 131 in the last session, leg spinner Narendra
Hirwani took three quick wickets to leave England on 168 for three at
stumps.  It was some revenge for the damage wreaked by Taylor, the
28-year-old Northants paceman who finished with figures of five for
46.

   Taylor said: "I'm not totally happy with the way I'm bowling,
although of course it's great to take five wickets in any cricket, and
especially in your first match for England.  "I know I can bowl better
and I must achieve more consistancy in line and length. There were too
many loose deliveries."

   The President's XI had resumed on 178 for three when play began an
hour late because of bad light.  England openers Gooch and Gatting put
on 73 by tea, and continued to sparkle afterwards, bringing up the
century stand in the 32nd over.  Gooch remained the dominant partner,
although both batsmen were able to strike freely against the tandem of
Maninder Singh and Hirwani, both former Test players.

   The partnership came to an end at 131 when Gooch, on 77, was
stumped off Hirwani as he played defensively forward.  Alec Stewart
followed in the same over, lbw for four, while Robin Smith spent ten
overs making a single before he too was beaten off the pitch as
Hirwani turned his googly.  But Gatting, joined by night-watchman Phil
DeFreitas was still there on 85 at the close of the second day of the
three-day match.

England first innings at close

   G.A. Gooch st Mongia b Hirwani ............ 77
   M.W. Gatting not out ...................... 85
   A.J. Stewart lbw b Hirwani ................. 4
   R.A. Smith lbw b Hirwani ................... 1
   P.A. Defreitas not out ..................... 0
   Extras (lb1) ............................... 1
   Total (3 wkts, 55 overs) ................. 168

   Fall:  1-131, 2-135, 3-164

   To bat: N.H. Fairbrother, G.A. Hick, C.C. Lewis, J.E. Emburey,
           J.P. Taylor, P.C. Tufnell

   Bowling: Viadya 6-0-24-0, Ankola 11-3-25-0, Chauhan 10-2-40-0, Maninder
            Singh 14-3-41-0, Hirwani 14-2-37-3

===
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: penglish@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au (Paul English)
Subject: Re: Pak win by 33 runs - the swing demons do it again
Keywords: over rates, slow play
Organization: Macquarie University, Australia.
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 03:19:21 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.015039.19388@leland.Stanford.EDU> urajan@leland.Stanford.EDU (Uday Rajan) writes:
>
> [Score details deleted]
>
>Wasim and Waqar bowled unchanged this morning - 11 overs each, over 2 hours.
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^  ^^^^^^^^^^^^

22 overs in more than 2 hours ?!

Does the 90 over rule apply in NZ, and if so have Pakistan being having
trouble meeting the target.  This wont apply in this case since the match
finished, but surely such an over rate, even given the fall of wickets,
must be unacceptable unless there were other stoppages.


-- 
    Paul English    |Email:                        |You can tell how far
   School of MPCE   |s8921366@mackay.mpce.mq.edu.au|we have to go when
Macquarie University|penglish@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au |today's supercomputers
 Sydney, Australia  |    paul@vulcan.anu.edu.au    |are programmed in FORTRAN
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi)
Subject: Re: Pak wins Test vs NZ!
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 20:35:58 GMT

In article <karnik.726260586@peca>, karnik@cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik) writes> 
> Heck, no - the Indian team should learn
> 
> A - Bowling
> B - Bowling
> C - Bowling
> 
> from the Pakistani team :-> Batting ? I don't think so! Currently we're 
> both competing for the worst batting lineup spot :-> Fielding ? Maybe...
> 
> 

When India was in Australia I mentioned on RSC that India's test
problems were not in the batting department but in bowling. (It is the
opposite in OD cricket --India has a decent OD attack but haven't
worked out a batting strategy yet.) The problem is that the bowling
does not create enough openings in the top order, and when it does, it
fails to wrap up the late middle order and tail. So the opposition
gets 350+ most of the time.  This puts an inordinate amount of
pressure on the batting lineup and test match batting is all about
pressure. India has to find three good attacking bowlers who can wrap
up a tail and get one or two quick dismissals in the top order.

Frankly, Kapil is no longer an attacking test match bowler. He is a
good economical new ball bowler for OD games. Its time for him to do
the Imran trick: less bowling and more reliable middle order batting.


Pakistan's batting problems? I think the problem here is that they are
not able to adjust between the test and OD games. Miandad may well
have been talking about this when he was reported to have complaied
about the schedule. I think Pakistan has played one four day game on
the tour so far. They also have a problem with the number 3 spot in
the OD side. Miandad will have to fix up the batting order. I think
we'll see changes this weekend. 


	--SAN
From: shafqat@neuro.duke.edu (Saad Shafqat)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: The birth of the metaphor.
Date: 7 Jan 93 01:11:26 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.




Two young men, miles from home, defending a target of 127 on an overcast 
day in January, down in New Zealand.  Sitting at the pinnale of their craft, 
unequaled in their mastery of the art of fast-bowling.  The ultimate 
fast-bowler: one who understands it takes only ten deliveries to dismiss the 
opposition.  And to think there was not just one of these but two!  What magic,
what melody.  What unbearable inspiration in their example: not merely the 
pursuit of perfection but its attainment.  Genius to the point of sin.
Welcome the new metaphor: he bowled like Wasim & Waqar, meaning he
bowled like the clap of thunder.  



-- 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: chess@McRCIM.McGill.EDU ()
Subject: Indoor Cricket Practice at McGill Gym
Originator: chess@kadumu.mcrcim.mcgill.edu
Organization: McGill Research Centre for  Intelligent Machines
Distribution: mcgill
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 93 00:20:40 GMT


The "Distribution" of this article has been set to "mcgill".
If the article is received outside this distribution then the
sender cannot be held responsible.

---------------------------------------------------
Indoor Cricket Practice at McGill Gym

Format: Taped Tennis ball on hardwood tiled floor
Date  : Saturday 9th January 1993
Time  : 10am - 1pm 
Place : Gyms 3 and 4 in the Currie Gym (Pine ave)

Strictly for members only.
New members welcome.
Club membership is $5.00

For more detail contact : Mark (843-6366)
			  Sushil(343-9020)
--------------------------------------------------


Posted on behalf of the McGill University Cricket Club Exec. 
-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
|	K.Sandrasegaran 		|  Tel : (514) 398-7159 /398-5857 |
|	McGill Research Center for -    |  Fax : (514) 398-4470           |
|	  Intelligent Machines (McRCIM) |  email: chess@mcrcim.mcgill.edu |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: pkohli@cc.gatech.edu (Prince Kohli)
Subject: Re: Gavaskar's comments
Reply-To: pkohli@cc.gatech.edu (Prince Kohli)
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 15:57:06 GMT

In article <10JAN199321412032@zeus.tamu.edu>, tap6901@zeus.tamu.edu (Rajesh Kukreja) writes:
|> I am confused with some of the comments of Gavaskar in his article in Times
|> of India dt. Dec 25.  This was after the one-day series between India and
|> S. Africa had concluded. He strongly criticizes the Indian batsmen for 
|> their lack of application. However later he goes on to write about Amre's 
|> and Yadav's batting in the last one day match, 
|> 
|> "Above all they showed a committment to the team which was really heart-
|> ening when you come across *others*, who only mouth they play for the country 
|> but in fact are not doing so, *their* only aim being to destablise Azhar's
|> captaincy".
|> 
|> My question to wel-informed nettors is, who are 'others', as mentioned in
|> the above para.  To me it seems the only persons to be gained by Azhar's
|> sacking will be Shastri or Kapil!! Are these remarks directed towards 
|> Kapil or Shastri??? Is the rivalry between Kapil and Gavaskar going on??
|> Well, I haven't been following cricket very well and hence the question.
|> However, in his article in the same newspaper dt. Dec 22, Gavaskar has
|> referred to Kapil as "one of the greatest" and giving everything to the
|> team even when injured. 
|> 

Well, I was in India during that time and from what I read in TOI and some
other places, it appears that Kapil is after the captaincy again (not that
I believe it). One journalist wrote "There are some senior players who
will do anything to get the captaincy. Won't tell who he is, but {\em
oda jawab nahin.}" (paraphrase) I guess the people who remember the famous
Palmolive ad will know what he is talking about. However, Gavaskar _was_
praising Kapil most of the time, both in the commentary box and in his
articles.

Of course, to one who saw the whole series and sat loyally through
all the humiliating dismissals, the only solution appears to be
to scrap everyone except Prabhakar, Kumble, Kapil and Srinath, and
take the Delhi Ranji team in its place :-(


|> Rajesh Kukreja


-Prince
-- 
pkohli@cc.gatech.edu      | "What's so unpleasant about getting drunk?" 
Distributed Systems Group,| "Ask a glass of water."   Hitchhikers'....
College of Computing, Georgia Tech.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: mfkhan@uncc.edu 
Subject: Re: King Kapil's no. of wickets
Reply-To: mfkhan@uncc.edu
Organization: University of NC at Charlotte
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 16:03:57 GMT


Could someone pl. let me know Border's test runs. 
It is difficult to believe some one is coming close to Gavaskar's
record run tally.
thanks

farrukh
From: mcbean@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Pak win by 33 runs - the swing demons do it again
Date: 9 Jan 93 01:50:16 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620

In article <kre.726504078@mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU>, kre@cs.mu.oz.au (Robert Elz) writes:
> In article <1993Jan5.214537.21806@walter.bellcore.com>,
> shamim@bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi) writes:
>> The spirit of this rule is to ensure sufficient action
>> for the paying public
> 
> That's the rationale, perhaps I'm a bit cynical, but I suspect the
> real reason for the rule is to squeeze in enough advertising breaks
> to keep commercial TV happy - each over is an advertising break
> after all...
> 
> This rule started in Aust (I believe), where commercial TV rules,
> and where the Aust public have been told that demanding more overs
> somehow benefits them (rather than demanding more entertaining cricket

I don't know about the Aus situation, but certainly there was a strong lobby in
England about the WI depriving the "paying public" (when did they ever matter
to the inbred mutants in charge of cricket) of full value, keeping their four
fast bowlers unfairly fresh, etc. etc.  This was accompanied by general
hysteria about short pitched murderous bowling, how we were killing off cricket
(and that despite being the biggest draw in world cricket).

So proposed by England, and supported by the spineless and sniveling
administrations of  Australia, NZ, India and Sri Lanka, we got the notorious 
one bouncer rule.  The over rate was chucked among much fanfare here.  It seems
though that everybody apart from the WI are being fined under it.  I'd like to
see the Englishmen wilt in Perth or Bridgetown trying to maintain 15 overs/hr. 
Or better yet they can send some spinners to be hit out of the park for easy
runs-:)

McBean

PS How many of you could go to a test match and tell 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: karnik@cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik)
Subject: Re: Pak wins Test vs NZ!
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 19:03:06 GMT

In <1icdlaINNsve@gaia.ucs.orst.edu> guptar@ucs.orst.edu (Rakesh Gupta) writes:

>Hats off to pakistani team for a great victory.

Absolutely! Actually, it would have been a bit of a surprise if they had
lost :->

>Indian cricket team should take lessons from pakistani team about ABC of
>cricket.
>A - Batting
>B - Bowling
>C - Fielding

Heck, no - the Indian team should learn

A - Bowling
B - Bowling
C - Bowling

from the Pakistani team :-> Batting ? I don't think so! Currently we're 
both competing for the worst batting lineup spot :-> Fielding ? Maybe...


>rakesh gupta


     +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
     | Neeran M. Karnik | #2 fan of Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar on r.s.c.  :-> |
     | Dept. of CompSci.| "Welcome to r.s.c.,                              |
     | U of Minnesota   |  where jingoism rules the netwaves" - McBean :-> |
     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: NZ v Pak: Pakistan win by 33 runs
From: awil2@cs.aukuni.ac.nz (Andrew James        Willmott       )
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 10:46:05 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Dept. University of Auckland

In <1993Jan5.060456.19037@cc.uow.edu.au> g9066624@cc.uow.edu.au (Tippu Hassan) writes:


>thanks for the great coverage.

>wondering if u could post the speed check on other bowlers eg wasim, danny
>etc

>and thanks to uday as well ( hope he reads this)

>							tipu

From what I recall Wasim and Danny had similar speeds, both ranging from 120 -
130 kph. Waqar tended to be about 5 kph faster than these two, generally
about 130-135 kph; the 139 kph ball was the only one over 135 that I can recall.
All the other seam bowlers were averaging around 120, although I can't
remember any figures for Owens; he's supposed to be pretty quick.

Cheers,

Andrew

-- 
+--- Andrew Willmott ------------- awil2@cs7.cs.aukuni.ac.nz ---+
| Diplomacy: The art of saying "nice doggie" until you find a   |
| rock.                                          -Wynn Catlin   |
+------------------------- Auckland, NZ ------------------------+
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: karnik@cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik)
Subject: Re: An attempt to follow-up on Mohan's "Indian Team - What now?"
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 20:32:44 GMT

In <00966739.94381AA0@vms.csd.mu.edu> 9063iyerm@vms.csd.mu.edu (Murali Iyer) writes:


>Prabhakar had gone on record that he *wanted* to open and was a regular opener
>for Delhi. His argument was, he was after all selected to the Indian team based
>on his performances for Delhi, and what did he do for Delhi? Open batting *and*
>bowling. So, he is game for that position of dual opener. Whether it is good
>enough for the team is the question. He seems to have justified his choice with
>that 60 plus knock.


	Yet another bowler-turned-opener? I'd rather go for a *genuine*
opener, having seen the repeated failures of the former kind.... And Prabhakar
doesn't open Delhi's innings *regularly*. Often, maybe, but not as a rule. In
any case, what does opening a Ranji innings have to do with Tests ? :->


>I don't want to sound like a trigger-happy fan, but I tend to agree with Mohan
>that Azhar should be asked to observe and learn. :--)

	Sorry, but they've kept him on.... and that too, for just the first
two ODIs and first test. How utterly ridiculous!


>>Start mending at home, where you can!  The dead Ranji pitches MUST go.

>Ahha! There you go. That's the first place we should start.


	This seems to be a very widely held opinion, but a few months
ago, Gavaskar wrote a pretty persuasive article in Sportstar arguing
basically that the fault lies with the bowlers.... now if I can find
the time to dig that out...

>-Murali

>p.s: Sudhama Gopalan has pointed out an error on my part in one of my posts. 
>He is right, I meant Vijay Yadav but wrote Rajesh Yadav. The latter is a
>pace-bowler, right?

	Yep, played for Hyderabad for some time. Didn't impress anyone, as 
far as I know, and doesn't seem to be around any longer. He was related in
some way (cousin or brother or something) to Shivlal Yadav.....



     +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
     | Neeran M. Karnik | #2 fan of Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar on r.s.c.  :-> |
     | Dept. of CompSci.| "Welcome to r.s.c.,                              |
     | U of Minnesota   |  where jingoism rules the netwaves" - McBean :-> |
     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: sidi@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Sadiq Yusuf)
Subject: Re: Gavaskar's opening partners
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 03:33:48 GMT

In article <1993Jan08.000121.190@sco.com> news@sco.com (News admin) writes:
>
>I think Lalchand Rajput opened in the series against Pakistan
>in the mid-80s.
>

	Are you talking tests or ODI's ?? Cause if it's tests, Lalchand
played only against Sri Lanka if I remember right. And Iam not certain that
he opened with Gavaskar - Gavaskar wanted to drop down the order in those
days and there were at least a few games in which he batted at #4 !!! 

			Sadiq [ who remembers that series ] Yusuf
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket,aus.jokes
From: gnb@baby.bby.com.au (Gregory N. Bond)
Subject: Re: Cricket Commentary Faux Pas
Organization: Burdett, Buckeridge & Young, Melbourne, Australia
	<trumpet-user.1.726647516@a.site.name>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 00:00:39 GMT

The all-time classic, many years ago.

John Arlott was commentating and a batsman was struck "in the groin"
on the fifth ball of the over.  After a few minutes of rolling on the
ground, he gets up and is ready to play.

Arlott: And <name> is ready to face <bowler> now, one ball
remaining...

--
Gregory Bond <gnb@bby.com.au> Burdett Buckeridge & Young Ltd Melbourne Australia
			Dizzy Gillespie: RIP.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: m0a1530@zeus.tamu.edu (ABBAS, MUSTAFA)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Pathetic Display of Batting from Pakistan
Date: 5 Jan 1993 12:17 CST
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: zeus.tamu.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

In article <9016@lee.SEAS.UCLA.EDU>, kahmed@titian.icsl.ucla.edu (Kashif A Ahmed) writes...

>Enough about India's batting guys!  I think Pakistan even tops India's 
				     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^	
>batting.  216 in the first inning and some 190 odd runs in the second 
>inning.  Total collapse of upper odder batting in both innings from Pakistan.
>I was expecting a little bit better and responsible batting from Pakistan,
>but they played like world Champions ;) ...Looks like Pakistan is back on 
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>track after Imran is gone.  

I completely fail to grab your point. If pakistan is doing so bad then 
how can they be playing like world champions. OR were you playing
sarcasm and made a fool out of me.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan)
Subject: Re: Indian Team.
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 16:01:39 EST
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor

In article <6647@falcon.ukc.ac.uk> rsp@ukc.ac.uk (R.S.Pickett) writes:
>
>Here is the Indian team that has been announced for the coming matches. I'm
>not sure if its just for the ODI's or if it includes the tests as well.
>
>M Azharuddin
>N Sidhu
>W Raman
>P Amre
>S Tendulkar
>V Kambli
>Kapil Dev
>M Prabhakar
>V Yadav
>A Kumble
>R Chauhan
>J Srinath
>S Ankola
>S Raju
>
Looks as if the Indian selector read rsc. The opinions expressed by most Indians
on the net (in general) have been - drop Manjrekar, Jadeja, Shastri, Chetan
Sharma, and perhaps More.
 So, Murali looks as if rsc has Vishy's ear, not Sunny, eh???? (:-)) (That was
my first smiley ever - for the man who swears by 'em)

Sudhama>
>
>Rob.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: a2824ag@sunmanager.LRZ-Muenchen.DE (Riaan de Jager)
Subject: SA/Pak/WI in SA?
Organization: Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 08:32:42 GMT

Hi

Is this right, SA West-India Pak triangular in SA? Could someone perhaps say
when and where things will happen? I'd just like to spend my holiday in SA
in some respectable manner :-)

Thank You

PS. How is Terence Lazard and Mark Rushmere doing in SA - any chance of them
making the next bok team? Does anyone predict some serious changes in our
line-up?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket