HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Monday, 6 Apr 1992 14:38:20 CDT
From: <U31073@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Birdless Celtics fly over Uninspired Bulls

=========================================================================
Date: 6 April 1992 14:26:15 CDT
From: <U31073@UICVM>
To:          rrm@icf.hrb.com (MURPH)
Subject:     Re: Re: Birdless Celtics fly over Uninspired Bulls

> In article <572@hsdndev.UUCP>, nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder 432-
>> I have to agree with Magic's comments at the end of the game where
>> he said that the Bulls are an unmotivated bunch right now because there is
>> nothing at stake for them until the playoffs get underway in 2 1/2 weeks.
>>
>> However, it was still awesome to see the Celts kicking Bulls butt on
>> national TV and sending them out of the Garden with a good fight at least
>> for this one game.
>>
>     It was also great to see them beat the Bulls without Bird. As for the
> motivation part of the Bulls, i don't think you can come up with an excuse
> except that they were beat. I think that Bird will be out until the playoffs,
> his back could use the rest. First Detroit and then the Bulls. GO CELTS!!
>
>
>                                                              Murph

That there are no excuses for the Bulls is right. However, when was there
ever such a big deal about anyone losing in Boston Garden? That is what
the mighty Celtics are supposed to do in the Gahden, isn't it? I daresay
that the Celtics are better off without Bird, anyway. Think about it. Can
you see Bird guarding Pippen? Pinckney does a much better job of it.
Good game by the Celtics, though. See you in the playoffs! (or maybe Chi.
will lose to the Heat in the first round - NOT!) (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)

Brent

BULLS REPEAT IN '92
From: tgross@cvbnet.prime.com (Thomas Gross x2002 5-2)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: The Chief:  BIT by Isiah?!
Date: 13 Apr 92 17:18:29 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Computervision

In article <1992Mar25.135309.23856@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM>, rogers@ofc.Columbia.NCR.COM (HL Rogers) writes:
|> >> >|celtics player danny ainge biting tree rollins.
|> >> >
|> >> >Rollins bit Ainge.
|> >> >
|> >> Ainge bit Rollins.  And that is a FACT (as a r.s.b.god of
|> >> yesteryear would have said) !
|> >
|> >Rollins bit Ainge.
|> >
|> FACT: Tom Gross bit Ed Lor then left r.s.bb in shame.  Prakash thrilled.

	FACT?  NOT!

	Who is Prakash?  After my time I'm afraid.  I do know where
	Mehrdad is, sort of, but I'm not telling...

/tom
From: glb50263@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Gary L. Blickhan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Rodman wins Shick award for the month
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:39:04 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

zaphiris@watson.ibm.com (Zaphiris Christidis) writes:

>In article <167C592A5.EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu> EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu writes:
>>Dennis Rodman, who averaged 20.3 rebounds per game in March, won the Shick
>proving that Rodman is second to Robinson :-). 


>Zaphiris D. Christidis,
>zaphiri@(watson.ibm.com, yktvmh.bitnet)


Stats! Stats! Stats!  Who cares? Let's let them play basketball.  (Well, maybe
Robinson can't play now...)

You can interpret statistics to mean many things.  Rodman is 85.3456% better
than Robinson in some things, and Robinson is 95.998764% better than
Rodman in other things.

(Quoted from the Almanac of Worthless Sports Statistics, 1992.77645)

Gary Blickhan
From: EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: EC semi finals
Date: 12 Apr 92 02:20:02 GMT
Article-I.D.: cms.167C613A1A.EIVERSO
Organization: Wayne State University, C&IT

In article <1992Apr10.220832.5077@ninja.zso.dec.com>
gregory@flood.zso.dec.com (Peter Gregory) writes:

>
>In article <167C5BEDD.EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu> EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu writes
>>In article <9820@bgsuvax.bgsu.edu>
>>koswatta@bgsu.edu (Sunil Koswatta) writes:
>>>Can Pistons take Bulls beyond 4 games in the Eastern Conference
>>>semi finals before bowing out?
>
>>The Pistons new trapping defense and increased passing has served them well
>>since they've implemented it for the past 3 games - all resulting in wins.
>
>The only problem is that putting in a new press is great for a couple of
>games in the NBA.  After that it gets killed by the coaches figuring out
>how to beat it and the excellent ball handlers that are on every team.

At this stage a couple games may be all that is necessary. Ok a few more than
that vs the Celts and then the Bulls, then the Pistons will be home free.

>
>In a playoffs, almost every press doesn't work anymore.  Granted that the
>Laker's 1-3-1 half court did well in the early 80's and the Knicks did
>press all season, with Rick Pitino as coach 3 years ago.  But the
>Piston's press almost certainly will not be a factor in a playoff series
>with the Bulls.

It took the Bulls 5 years to figure out how to beat the "Jordan rules."
The press is only one major new part to the Pistons' traditionally tough D.
Other components are increased passing, communication between players,
switching off the traps, fast breaks, and unselfish play.

In last nights victory over Charlotte, the Pistons had 43 assists, 56 rebounds,
12 steals, and 5 blocks. This is a changed team, playing the last 4 games like
they did when they were champs!
>
>You heard it here first!

Ditto!
>
>Peter
>

--Eric
From: oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D. Oliver III)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Call for Discussion: rec.sport.basketball.meeks/lor
Date: 8 Apr 92 23:50:34 GMT
	<1992Apr8.222646.25466@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In article <1992Apr8.222646.25466@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) wrote:
> Actually Meeks has uncharacteristically disappeared.
> 
> It's either:
> 
> 1) Meeks is on vacation

Damn.  Exactly right, Ed.  It's almost like there was some kind of
telepathic link.

--
____________________________
	Jim Oliver  
	oliver@athena.mit.edu /	joliver@hstbme.mit.edu
	oliver%mitwccf.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
From: tblackma@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Tom Blackman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Bulls Yea Pistons No....NOT!
Date: 6 Apr 92 21:31:06 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network

In article <1992Apr6.180346.11607@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> glb50263@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Gary L. Blickhan) writes:
>pabouki@eos.ncsu.edu (PERRY ANDREW BOUKIDIS) writes:
>
>>In response to Eric the Piston / Thug fan:
>
>>	Fact is the Pistons not only lost to the Bullets on Friday night...
>>They got wiped by a Pervisless Washington team.  Losing at one point
>>by as many as 40 points.  I wish I was there to hear what Robin Ficker
>>could have been saying!!
>
>>                                Go Bulls,       
>> 
>>                                      Perry Boukidis
>
>>                              
>
>Da Bulls choked against a Birdless Celtic team, didn't they?!
>
>Gary Blickhan
>
>Go Pistons

Yep, they lost, but who cares?  DA BULLS won the division title anyway.
Actually, I wanted DA BULLS to lose just so Boston could have a better
record than the Pistons.

Tom.

DA BULLS IN '92
-- 
tblackma@gn.ecn.purdue.edu--------------------------Thomas Blackman
Paint em all, let the judges sort em out.          Go team Tippmann
Xref: sparky rec.sport.basketball.pro:8246 rec.sport.basketball.college:11880
From: wgr@rti.rti.org
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro,rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: FAB FIVE !!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 14 Apr 92 23:19:37 GMT
Organization: Research Triangle Institute, RTP, NC

In article <204823@unix.cis.pitt.edu> pmmst8@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Paul M Mweene) writes:
>Those boys broke my heart. They were far away a vastly superior team. However
>childish exuberance and lack of patience kept the score close.

Aren't patience and the ability to control "childish exuberance" important
qualities of a good team?  I don't know what you're talking about anyway.
Michigan appeared tired rather than exuberant to me.

>                                                               If the entire
>Duke team transferred to Michigan the only person who would have a chance of
>starting is Grant Hill in place of Ray Jackson.

How do you get this?  Laettner played the worst half of his career and still
outscored Webber for the game.  Rose is a good player (although he talks way
too much shit), but he's not close to Hurley yet.  I think you're judging
these teams by the potential of the individual players rather than their
current ability.

>                                                However it was too much to
>expect the "freshers" to beat the refs as well.

A vastly superior team should be able to overcome poor officiating.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro,rec.sport.basketball.college
From: m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu (Michael L. Le Houllier)
Subject: Re: FAB FIVE !!!!!!!!!!!
Reply-To: m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu (Michael L. Le Houllier)
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, N.H.
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 13:49:17 GMT

In article <1992Apr5.081111.13088@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> gburton@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Garland O Burton) writes:
>In article <1992Apr5.015704.11577@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> gyuwono@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Gunawan Yuwono) writes:
>>In article <1992Apr5.013751.18281@cs.wayne.edu> delledg@jake.cc.wayne.edu (De V
>>aughn Elledge)

>duke will go down to the big ten on monday.  mark my words.

I've marked them... You were WRONG!!!
>
>gb
>
>-- 
>gburton@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...buckeye.hoopsters=1992.big.ten.champs!




-- 
 Michael Le Houllier           *  John 3:16  * Nov 12, 1991 - Dili      
 (m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu.us) *  Remember: June 4, 1989 - Beijing
 Go BLUE JAYS  3-0  v. Orioles   Friday, Saturday and Sunday
 The Rangers jinx continues.  The year they could win, they strike.
From: wakankar@egr.msu.edu (PUT YOUR NAME HERE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: MISSING
Date: 16 Apr 92 16:19:05 GMT
Reply-To: wakankar@egr.msu.edu (PUT YOUR NAME HERE)
Distribution: na
Organization: Michigan State University
Originator: wakankar@frith.egr.msu.edu

I remember reading that Jack Sikma has officially retired.

Parag
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Call for Discussion: rec.sport.basketball.meeks/lor
Keywords: It's time
Date: 8 Apr 92 22:26:46 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Apr3.200351.28129@ennews.eas.asu.edu> koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann) writes:
>>This is a proposal to add a news group for Meeks, Lor, and all the
>>other idiots that waste Internet bandwidth on childish discussion
>>about who is statistically better than who, who's dad could kick
>>who's dad's ass, and other assorted BS.
Come to think of it, Meeks hasn't responded to my message
<1992Apr4.005821.29206@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>, the last one on Rodman/Robinson.
Actually Meeks has uncharacteristically disappeared.

It's either:

1) Meeks is on vacation
2) Meeks wimps out
3) Net.police Harry scares the shit out of Meeks, so he leaves the 
   net for good.

Inquiry mind wants to know.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: McNaught@aristotle.ils.nwu.edu (Jim McNaught)
Subject: Re: Celtics Rock On!
Organization: Institute for the Learning Sciences
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:14:26 GMT

In article <13APR199209250881@zeus.tamu.edu> h0j1297@zeus.tamu.edu (BURT 
J.) writes:
> Their last
> three games are:  (home) Heat; (away) Sixers and Pistons.  If the series 
did
> end up in a tie between the Knicks and the Celtics who would get 2nd??  
Who
> won the season series?

Actually, in order it's Sixers (away), Pistons (away), Heat (home).  If 
New York and Boston wind up tied at the end of the season, the Celtics 
will take the Atlantic Division Crown--though I don't know if that results 
from Conference records or season series.  Boston has won the season 
series with New York.  Take that, Pat Riley!

> Anyway, I'd like to see the Celtic-Pacer match up 
> again!

I'd rather see Boston-New Jersey, myself, or better yet Boston-Atlanta, 
though that won't happen.  The Pacers will run the Celts five games, have 
no doubt.  The Nets are hot, and they too may give whoever they play a run 
for their money.  Actually, I'll take odds that they'll defeat the Knicks 
if they match up in the first round.  NY's been playing Very Uninspired 
ball lately.   How the C's do against anyone is anyone's guess--can they 
defeat any team other than Miami or Atlanta in the first round without 
Larry Bird?

JMc

"Oderint, dum metuant."
(Let them hate, so long as they fear)
--Accius
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: robart@agora.uucp (Robert Barton)
Subject: Re: Sixers no playoffs-enter Shaq lottery
Organization: Organization
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 06:34:26 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.153548.18637@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>, jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes) writes:
> 
> Yeah, a 1-in-66 chance.  But stranger things have happened.


  What odds would you Philly fans give on Barkley being back next year?

-- 

If you do not file a return...we may also have to disallow the exemptions,
exclusions, credits, deductions, or adjustments shown on your tax return.
                                                                 - The IRS
From: awesley@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Tony Wesley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Rodman wins Shick award for the month
Date: 10 Apr 92 22:29:22 GMT
Organization: National Federation of Associations

glb50263@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Gary L. Blickhan) writes:

>You can interpret statistics to mean many things.  Rodman is 85.3456% better
>than Robinson in some things, and Robinson is 95.998764% better than
>Rodman in other things.

Well, that's only true in 84.317% of the games.  

-- 
 Tony Wesley					 awesley@vela.acs.oakland.edu

   The right most valued by all civilized men is the right to be left alone.
							-- Louis Brandeis
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: robart@agora.uucp (Robert Barton)
Subject: Re: Spurs New Head Coach(Tark)
Organization: Organization
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 07:07:08 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.143259.54511@cc.usu.edu> ecol@cc.usu.edu writes:
>Tark the Shark is going to be the next head coach at
>San Antonio.  However, he won't start until after the
>playoffs. This according to Headline Sports.


  Well let's see, since the playoffs start on April 23, I guess
that means Tark will be taking over in SA around April 30.

-- 

If you do not file a return...we may also have to disallow the exemptions,
exclusions, credits, deductions, or adjustments shown on your tax return.
                                                                 - The IRS
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: 11mwarner@galluj
Subject: Home Court for Det-Bos????
Organization: Gallaudet University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 02:49:27 GMT



Hi.  I was just wondering about Pistons-Celtics for the playoffs.  If they end
up tied with each other in the 4th and 5th positions, who gets the home court
advantage?

						PSYCHO
                                                (Pistons Fanatic)

.sig file under construction
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Another Bird man
Date: 14 Apr 92 15:29:42 GMT
Article-I.D.: uvmark.1992Apr14.152942.19734
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.

In article <1992Apr13.215806.17048@ennews.eas.asu.edu> koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann) writes:
>In article <kujgd2INNqp4@utkcs2.cs.utk.edu> schulman@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (NEIL WAYNE SCHULMAN) writes:
>
>>The fact is the Celtics have the second best record in their division...
>
>Yea and only a few games above .500 - Ohhh to play in the East.  :)

Hmm... Last I looked, they were 17 games above 500.  In fact, only 7 teams
have better records, 3 of those in the East, 4 in the West.  
>
-- 
David T. Meeks                    ||" Strange how laughter looks like crying
VMark Software, Inc.              ||  with no sound.
uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  Raindrops taste like tears, without
davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||  the pain."
From: mjk@icf.hrb.com (Michael J. Kelley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Sixers no playoffs-enter Shaq lottery
Date: 15 Apr 92 09:40:45 GMT
Organization: HRB Systems, Inc.

Yes, My Sixers lost and they won't be in the playoffs thus giving us a chance 
for Shaq!!!


                                                              Mike Kelley
                                                              HRB Systems
                                                              St. College, Pa.

###############################################################################

###############################################################################
From: schulman@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (NEIL WAYNE SCHULMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Larry still better than the average forward
Date: 13 Apr 92 17:03:31 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Dept, University of Tennesee, Knoxville
Distribution: world
Reply-To: schulman@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (NEIL WAYNE SCHULMAN)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra3f.cs.utk.edu

>>You mean that the Lakers would have taken Bird instead of Magic?
>I think there is a very good chance.  [...]
>But as with anything else, it depends on what the franchise needs,

As the story goes, then-owner Cooke vetoed all ideas to draft Sidney
Moncrief.  He believed (oh, how correctly!) that Magic will be a crowd
pleaser and a big draw in glitzy L.A.

Based on this bit of gossip, I have no doubt that he would have taken
Magic over Bird , too.


--Gidi

That is indeed possible, but what if they needed a super forward?  All I said was what if they didn't need a guard at all, and had no forwards?  All theory of course, since I was only 6 years old during the '79 draft.

Neil
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith)
Subject: Re: Birdless Celtics fly over Uninspired Bulls
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 92 23:07:13 GMT

In article <572@hsdndev.UUCP> nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder 432-4219) writes:
>I have to agree with Magic's comments at the end of the game where
>he said that the Bulls are an unmotivated bunch right now because there is
>nothing at stake for them until the playoffs get underway in 2 1/2 weeks.
>
>However, it was still awesome to see the Celts kicking Bulls butt on 
>national TV and sending them out of the Garden with a good fight at least
>for this one game.
>
>-Mark.

it must be pointed out that jordan only went to the line twice on 12-28
shooting and in general the home calls were there.  the 24-sec stuck button
on one of mchale's clankers was even chuckled over by the TV guys, as the
camera searched out Red Auerbach in the stands.

However, it is also true that the celtics were focused and determined, playing
some of their best team defense (which, at its best, wouldnt have been enough
here) and - who knows? - if bird plays, they may have not had the same mental
edge and may have lost.

boxscore coming up next....

- nate
From: ec120wee@sdcc4.ucsd.edu (Anthony Minkoff)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: COTY
Date: 8 Apr 92 06:05:51 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

Okay, so who's going to be COTY?  Some possible candidates, in
order, in my opinion:

Larry Brown (of course)
Pat Riley
Don Nelson
George Karl
Phil Jackson (probably has too much talent on his team to be a
                viable candidate, but he is a very good coach)

Of course, if the Lakers don't make the playoffs, Dunleavy has to be
considered.  For a team with James Worthy, Sam Perkins, A.C. Green,
Vlade Divac, Byron Scott, and Sedale Threatt to manage to get into
the lottery for a shot at a franchise-player is quite an
accomplishment!  :-)


Tony Minkoff
From: schulman@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (NEIL WAYNE SCHULMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Det-Bos-Home-Court-Money-Root-?
Date: 13 Apr 92 17:19:57 GMT
Reply-To: schulman@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (NEIL WAYNE SCHULMAN)
Organization: Computer Science Dept, University of Tennesee, Knoxville
NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra3f.cs.utk.edu

> Who did you root for Tuesday when the Pistons beat the Knicks 103-94?

	We all rooted for the Knicks, of course. No self-respecting Celtic fan
would ever root for the Pistons!

	BTW, did you hear about the fans at Boston Garden passing the hat
arround and raising $2,500 for Oakley the other night? :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)



-- 
!	Jim  Halpin
!	halpin@turkey.sw.stratus.com
!	No Snow! No Snow! No Snow! No Snow! No Snow! No Snow! No Snow! 
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{

Hey, pass that hat around for me!!  I could use some money!  And I'm a Celts fan!

Neil
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: wrl@pmafire.inel.gov (William Lechner)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 13:14:14 GMT
Organization: WINCO
Subject: BOXSCORE chi77ind78.10apr92
Summary: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: world
Organization: WINCO
Keywords: 

chi 108, ind 96   10apr92

chi (63-14)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
grant,horace      36    5   8   0  0   5  7   2 11   0   3  2  0  3  0  0   15
pippen,scottie    36    6   9   0  0   6  9   1  6   5   4  1  2  0  0  0   18
cartwright,bill   20    2   4   0  0   5  6   0  5   0   1  0  1  0  0  0    9
jordan,michael    42   16  30   1  1   2  4   0  4   6   3  4  1  0  1  0   35
paxson,john       26    3   6   1  2   1  2   0  2   3   2  1  0  0  0  0    8
armstrong,bj      23    2   6   0  0   1  2   0  1   5   1  1  1  0  0  0    5
perdue,will        9    0   2   0  0   0  0   0  2   1   1  0  1  1  0  0    0
levingston,cliff  18    4   5   0  0   1  2   2  6   0   2  0  0  0  0  0    9
hodges,craig       7    1   3   0  0   0  0   0  0   0   0  0  0  0  0  0    2
king,stacey        6    3   4   0  0   0  0   1  2   1   1  0  0  0  0  0    6
williams,scott    13    0   2   0  1   1  4   1  7   1   1  0  0  0  0  0    1
hansen,bob         4    0   0   0  0   0  0   0  0   0   1  0  0  0  0  0    0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
chi totals       240   42  79   2  4  22 36   7 46  22  20  9  6  4  1  0  108
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .532   .500   .611       team rebs 11
bench technicals: PJackson

ind (38-40)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
person,chuck      31    6  14   1  5   1  1   0  3   5   2  0  2  0  0  0   14
thompson,lasalle  19    2   4   0  0   1  1   2  7   1   4  0  2  1  0  0    5
smits,rik         15    2   4   0  0   0  0   0  1   1   3  0  0  1  0  0    4
williams,micheal  36    2  11   0  2   1  2   0  5   7   4  3  2  0  0  0    5
miller,reggie     42    8  16   2  4   8  8   3  6   3   4  0  3  1  0  0   26
schrempf,detlef   36    5  12   0  2   7  9   1 10   2   4  1  2  0  0  0   17
mccloud,george    19    4   9   1  4   0  0   1  2   4   0  1  2  1  0  0    9
davis,dale        22    0   0   0  0   1  2   0  5   1   4  0  0  0  0  0    1
fleming,vern      20    7  10   1  1   0  1   1  3   2   1  0  0  0  0  0   15
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ind totals       240   36  80   5 18  19 24   8 42  26  26  5 13  4  0  0   96
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .450   .278   .792       team rebs  1


chi   34  25  23  26  -  108
ind   23  29  24  20  -   96

attendance 16530, time ?:??, officials: JODonnell,TDurham,WMayfield