From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Subject: Yet another Poser
Organization: Texas Instruments, Inc
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 02:49:47 GMT

For someone not involved, Mr. Poser sure seems eager to keep fanning
the flames.  

In article <1992Jul25.202910.3435@dscomsf.desy.de> misc-test@ucbvax.berkeley.edu writes:
>In article <1992Jul24.201834.15527@mksol.dseg.ti.com>, 
>mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com, a squawking ti drone without too much originality
>seems to have aquired a yen to be abused in talk.bizarre:

Feel free.  Clutter up talk.bizarre all you want.  We'll make more.

>
>|>In article <1992Jul24.180256.10474@asuvax.eas.asu.edu> ra@asuvax.eas.asu.edu (Starcap'n Ra) writes:
>|>>mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539) writes:
>|>>> >> That's nice, but why don't you try sending dozens of these by mail to
>|>>> >> individual people
>|>>> >
>|>>> >     Instead of posting like *you* did, you silly
>|>>> >hypocrite?
>|>>> 
>|>>> I tried mail.  You weren't amenable.
>|>>
>|>>     Ah, I see.  When things don't go your
>|>>way, you and only you get to break your rules.
>|>>When anyone else tries email and it doesn't
>|>>work, they on the other hand must still follow
>|>>your rules.
>
>|>No, you simpering fool. 
>
>Creative little rug-rat, aren't You? 

Get back to me when you grow up, find a life, or get a clue, ok?

>
>|>                        I'm simply treating you by YOUR rules.
>
>Amusing. You don't really know what the rules are, but You think
>You can deduce them, don't You? This idiotic thread has gone on long enough 
>and there were enough requests, phrased in a more or less polite way, for
>the brain-damaged idjits [tm] in those two alt.politics.* groups to get
>their act together and edit the newsgroups line, before Ralphie did his 
>shtick. What in the name of Cthulhu makes You think they will comply 
>without the gentle persuasion of a suitably applied two-by-four? 

What makes you think they WILL?  Given the tactics so far, I sure as
hell don't plan to.

>
>|>Perhaps everyone in all the alt.politics.* groups should do the same.
>
>I would be rather careful with statements such as this, moron. Up to
>now most people haven't been really annoyed, I guess. Don't even
>contemplate escalation!

Isn't that what you're doing?  Think you're immune, do you?

>
>|>Since I think you're outnumbered, I would think it would make more
>|>sense for you to simply do as I suggested in the first place; 
>
>Subject: Top 25 News Groups for the last 2 weeks
>Message-ID: <1992Jul24.190837.4090@uunet.uu.net>
>
>         No. of        $ Cost  % of  Cumulative
>Rank  Kbytes Articles per Site Total  % of Total  Group (Articles/contributor)
>
>  18  2655.4    2515      7.01  0.5%    30.4%     talk.bizarre (5.1)
>
>Care to corroborate Your ludicrous statement, mooselips?

Irrelevent in any case, butterfly-butt.  This silliness could always
be automated so I don't have to spend even the minimal amount of time
on it that I do now.

>
>|>                                                              send
>|>mail to the people who accidently post to the wrong group, don't
>|>follow-up to annoy everyong else, and after a few days it's all over.
>
>Usually not. There are just too many BDIs in those groups.

And what's sauce for the goose, and all that.  I'm not particularly
impressed with your lack of 'I'ness.

>
>|>But not you, little Rara.  You want to play the jerk.  Well, suit
>|>yourself. 
>
>No, this is left entirely to Yourself. You see, on those particular
>little dungheaps that You've claimed to own and which You seem to be
>crowing over defensively, You might aspire to be the high and mighty 
>cock-of-the-woop, ludicrous as that may seem to others.

Who me, I don't claim any such thing, but you sure seem to want to.
You've really got to quit looking in that mirror.  It's obviously
affected your mental equilibrium.

>
>In other places there is another word for the likes of You: Roast 

Not me, Dozer.  I'm pretty fireproof.  And at least that makes me
animal.  From your intellect, I'd say you're more the vegetable class. 

>
>[rest of vapid burbling contemptously nuked, its just more of the same and 
> the quality goes downhill all the time, but what else is new?]

Gee, I would have deleted the stupid rambling from yours, but then
there'd be nothing left.  Besides, I prefer to make it obvious just
who is working to make sure the inappropriate posts to talk. bizarre
continue. 

>
>|>"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
>|> in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
>
>Makes You really wish that ole Challenger had aboard one McCall when it blew.
>On the other hand, sometimes You need a puchingbag and what the hell, the
>McCall droid will serve admirably for that purpose.

Tell you what.  I'll ride a Shuttle if you'll lie under it during launch.

>
>|>Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
>                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>So who made You pipe up for the rest of the alt.politics.* people, needlessly
>protracting a conflict You are rather illequipped to fight out?
>Sheer vainglory? Gallant Masochism? Heroic histrionic stupidity?

Don't be silly.  If I played it your way this would actually be
appropriate for talk.bizarre, and I wouldn't want that.  Fortunately,
this sort of stupidity with folks like you requires so little effort
and thought that I'm quite willing to do it indefinitely.

>
>Now Jump into a goddamn volcano, You fucking cave newt!
>
>       Till Poser         Internet: poser@vxdsyc.desy.de
>-F35- ZEUS DESY/Freiburg  Bitnet:   POSER@DESYVAX
>bldg.1b-235, Notkestr.85  Hepnet:   VXDESY::POSER (13313::Poser)
>   D-2000 Hamburg 52      Tel.: -49-40-8998-2004


-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.