HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rossi@mtu.edu (Rossi)
Subject: That attitude (that etude)
Summary: brain gloms
Organization: Michigan Technological University
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 02:45:17 GMT

   Well Sandy Claws wuz veddy, veddy, gut to me this year.  She
stuffed my stocks and broke my bonds of all that repetitive
predictable no deposit no interns kinda attitude.  S(now) I'm
drain od (book 'em draino).  For good reasons, in good time,
I'm well seasoned, 'til next time.  My chimes rang once too 
many and the phone bob is next years reminder of conversations
better left unrepentent.  So what did land on my nestling
site?  Well a fifth of Kaluha and some Kisses[tm] which when
melted in half-n-halftime and mixeredblenderstirred together
and a dashing of K made for a very waist expandin sedition of
warm glowedness.  A pile of good books and plenty of stormy
weather to enjoy them therein.  Thusforthwent onward and
watched moo v The Princes Bride and died of hiccups with 
stitches in both sides!  I mean if you don't have your 
health you don't have anything.  >;-)  Went up the hill
and lifted some wights from the barrows and wandered back
to my humble nest and slept the sleep of the innersent.

And if that made sense:


ObSocSniggles    Give me a bird with a twinkle in her eye,
Mantra           a mischievious grin, a seance (knock three
Etude            times) of hummer, tolerance (about .005)
New              for bad puns, tight buns (it rhymes I can
Years            get away with it (yes occifer I know my
Fish             poetica license has bean a turnip :) ) and
Wish             the confidence to act upon her flights of
                 fantasea.  Touch me once and call it
                 a test tickle, touch me twice and you'd
                 get a mental pause (paws) until you hit 
                 my resent button.  Time to go.  It seems
                 I'm on the air?  *churp!*

   songbird - fielding kwestions from the peanut galleria
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: cjp8b@dayhoff.med.Virginia.EDU (Chris Penington)
Subject: Re: Minimal apparel and packing (was Re: Size 8?)
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 20:24:21 GMT

In article <1992Dec23.022900.3251@netcom.com> cocoa@netcom.com writes:
>
>Ah, well, I had to cancel plans due to lack of funds (I won't be going to
>Australia either, btw) <sob>.

>little 'e'

Darn! <sob, sniff> How about I pop you in my extra suitcase
when I pass through on my way home next summer? BTW, any soc.singlers
who want crash space in Canberra should check with me. I should be
living there by next September at the latest. I'm not sure what my
user id will be but I expect to be @rsc3.anu.edu.au 

	Chris

-- 
Chris Penington (cjp8b@virginia.edu)   
Biochemistry Dept., Box 440             I'm not really a physical biochemist
UVa Health Sciences Ctr,                     but I play one in the lab... 
Charlottesville, Va 22908   (804)924-8210   
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,soc.penpals,alt.romance.chat
From: "A.J. Janschewitz" <p00258@psilink.com>
Subject: Re: Do you have a good pickup line?
Organization: Performance Systems Int'l
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 18:31:58 GMT
X-Mailer: PSILink-DOS (3.3)

>DATE:   Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:45:35 GMT
>FROM:   Meloney D Cregor <mel@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu>
>
>In article <1hupltINN8fr@news.UU.NET> ender@shiva.UU.NET (Pete "Ender" Walsh) writes:
>>Thank you!  *bow*
>
>Well, I wouldn't bow *too* low.  You never know what might happen while
>you're down.
>
>>How about the classic, "What's a slut like you doing in a classy joint like
>>this??"
>
>I'm not picking on you in particular, Pete, perhaps it's just me and I'm
>getting too old and fogeyish, but the most of these and this one in
>particular would possibly get you a beer in the face.

Perhaps the hidden agenda here is free beer ...

==a.j.==

Nonstandard disclaimer: I really *am* responsible.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: daniel@clsi.COM (Daniel S. Barclay)
Subject: Re: Woman With Many Legs has Genitals Shoved
Organization: CAD Language Systems Inc.
Date: 21 Dec 92 15:25:40

nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
> ...
> 13.   I got to meet some people that I have considered friends for
> a long time.
> ...
"I can't pretend a stranger is a long-awaited friend." - Rush

And good "ketchup" quoting, Nance.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel S. Barclay                    --who's still searching for a good 
CAD Language Systems, Inc.           signature, not liking any of his recent
Suite 101, 5457 Twin Knolls Rd.      feeble attempts to improve on the whiny:
Columbia, MD  21045  USA             Why can't _I_ think of a good signature?

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 15:48:14 GMT

In article <JoeMan.10.724984859@> JoeMan@ (Joe Tooman) writes:
>>Sorry, as any s.s regular can tell you, *they're* all dating jerks:-)
>>Hey, what's wrong with sluts?  I'll bet you don't even know any.
>>And too bad--you might learn a thing or two.
>>
>	Whats wrong with a slut?  First off, I want a woman I can respect. 
>Why are you trying to make me out as a geek?  I am active in my community,
>
 
Geek?
 
>Magazine model?  Naah. To much compitition. Besides, my exgirlfriend was
>on that caliber, and I usually got pissed off at the number of guys
>that approached her.  What ended it was her cheating on me.  
 
Seesters?
 
 
>.....stricted from meeting new woman every day.
>campus ........
>
 
We knew that.
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
                                 doh#0000000005
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: R9S@ECL.PSU.EDU (Roberto G Sung)
Subject: Re: Do you have a good pickup line?
Organization: Penn State Engineering Computer Lab
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 93 17:14:13 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

In <1993Jan2.214326.2397@src.honeywell.com> gcary@src.honeywell.com writes:

> "Did you hurt yourself when you fell from heaven?"
> 
> "What screws like a tiger and winks?" (follow it up with a wink)
> (I've never used that one ;-)
> 
> -- 
> Greg Cary  gcary@src.honeywell.com    office: (612)782-7683  FAX: (612)782-7438
> Honeywell Systems & Research Center MN65-2500
> 3660 Technology Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55418

The first one might actually work unless the subject of your flirtation
has the unfortunately good memory to recall that no one but the Serpent
had "fallen" from heaven according to the Scriptures...

just a little religious twist to keep up with the current trend.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jenk@microsoft.com (Jen Kilmer)
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Date: 23 Dec 92 22:40:40 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation

In article <1992Dec18.151557.24143@rchland.ibm.com> bill@tran.fishkill.ibm.com () writes:
>In article <1grgmiINNq52@agate.berkeley.edu>,
>monaghn@garnet.berkeley.edu (Mara Monaghan) writes:
>> Your generalizations are inaccurate for
>> the "average woman.  This is, of course,
>> my humble opinion and is based on my own 
>> past experience and that of my friends.
>> (re: weekly offers) 
>
>Time out, here. Mara, your observations are based on your experiences,
>as Steve's are on his. Maybe the dating situation (and general social
>protocal ?) are vastly different where each of you live. Where I live
>here, most of my female friends are approached at LEAST once or twice a
>week. A friend of mine lives in Wisconsin, and she hasen't been asked
>out or apporached in months. Don't bash the guy until you understand his
>local dating climate.

WHAT???  Where the hell do you LIVE??? Females approached at LEAST
once or twice a week????

Of course, daily environment (which for me is mostly work) counts
too. I was "approached" by 4 ex-coworkers the month after I got my
new job ... but that still only puts me at about 7 approaches for
the year.  

I've also been the "approacher" 4 times.

>> (BTW, what do you mean by "approaching",
>> "luck out", and "offers"? Just curious)

I'm using "introduce & ask for my phone number" (people I don't know)
and "asking out" (people I already know) in counting "approaches" -
each approacher counts once.

-jen
 (microsoft corp, redmond, washington (state), usa)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: daniel@clsi.COM (Daniel S. Barclay)
Subject: Re: Picking up the Tab (was: Re: What is gold-digging?)
Organization: CAD Language Systems Inc.
	<1992Dec19.224000.28895@netcom.com>
	<1992Dec20.003840.24916@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: 23 Dec 92 13:58:56

gds@york.cs.ucla.edu (Greg Skinner) writes:
> >Overall, I think that if two people are getting together on a Date, the
> >default assumption should be that the asker will pay --
> 
> Why?
> 
> I have yet to see one logical reason in this thread (or any other on
> this subject) why there should be one default rule on "Dates".

You need a default at least for whether it's acceptable to negotiate.  (I.e.,
it were considered rude to negotiate, and there was no default for who paid,
how would anyone know what to do?)  Okay.  Sorry.  Too technical a point.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel S. Barclay                    --who's still searching for a good 
CAD Language Systems, Inc.           signature, not liking any of his recent
Suite 101, 5457 Twin Knolls Rd.      feeble attempts to improve on the whiny:
Columbia, MD  21045  USA             Why can't _I_ think of a good signature?

Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.pagan,alt.romance,alt.sex,alt.polyamory,talk.religion.misc
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Truth
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 14:18:33 GMT

In article <1992Dec29.042902.11064@nuscc.nus.sg> eng10172@nusunix1.nus.sg (POH HONG CHENG) writes:
>ihiimjaiosjdkaksio
 
Your gettin better Poh. You can do it. Come on spit it out.

 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
                                 doh#0000000005
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Picking up the Tab (was: Re: What is gold-digging?)
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 21:24:54 GMT

In article <16150@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <1992Dec30.134100.28409@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
> 
>|I may have to bring along *that* girl in Jan. We had a recent bout of Jealousy
>|as opposed to Jeapardy.
>
>James is dating Marlo Thomas?  Somehow she doesn't seem like she'd be his type.
>

I've always loved snooty rich kid women who like to boss around the
servants. Once Phil came home early and luckily I had a spare silver
wig in my G-string. I mimicked his every move and he thought she had
purchased a new mirror.
That was sorta a close one.
 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
                                 doh#0000000005
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger)
Subject: Re: Breaking up is hard to do....
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 16:26:42 GMT
Organization: MCSNet, Chicago, IL

In article <1992Dec31.132159.21851@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> jsmt@troi.cc.rochester.edu (Julia Smith) writes:
>Now that the holidays are gone, 'tis the season to revise relationships
>(don't know why, but it seems to be happening alot).  My question:
> 
>What do you do when you know it is over/you find yourself uninterested/
>you want to be moving on?

I tell the other person, and we find a way to salvage anything that might be
left between us.

If I care enough to sleep with another, I normally don't find them so
repulsive in the future that I would choose to sever all contact.  The
exception is when I find that someone has been hateful or grossly deceitful
in their conduct during the relationship itself.

--
Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
Data Line: [+1 312 248-0900] Anon. arch. (nuucp) 00:00-06:00 C[SD]T
Request file: /u/public/sources/DIRECTORY/README for instructions
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,soc.penpals,alt.romance.chat
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: Do you have a good pickup line?
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 13:09:21 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Followup-To: alt.romance,soc.penpals,alt.romance.chat


Get your childish baby-boy thread the hell out of soc.singles.
Gee thanks, and have a nice day.
r.
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.pagan,alt.romance,alt.sex,alt.polyamory,talk.religion.misc
From: eng10172@nusunix1.nus.sg (POH HONG CHENG)
Subject: Re: Truth
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 04:29:02 GMT

ihiimjaiosjdkaksio
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 93 20:25:03 GMT

In article <7-rrd#-@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
>In article <1992Dec29.172417.11540@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> masterov@cstr.ecn.purdue.edu (Michael Masterov) writes:
>>Tim, stuff it.  Didn't you read what she wrote?  Her religion forbids it.
>>You can call religion an archaic basis for mating, but the majority of
>>the world happens not to agree with you.  
>
>And that, Michael, is an archaic and close-minded way of running a society.
>Sure most all religions are like that, but just because the majority of
>the world happens to do something doesn't necessarily make it 'right' (all
>depending on your definitionof right).

Actually, all that's necessary for any criterion in the quest for a mate
to be 'right' is for the one doing the questing to believe that it is.
Whether you or I or the rest of the world agree with it is irrelevant--
the characteristics that are important to her are the characteristics
that are important to her and who are any of us to say that her priorities
in her personal life are 'wrong'?

Similar world views and philosophies are often important--even essential--
for a relationship's long-term success; one's religious leanings would 
seem often to have more than a small correlation with these and, therefore,
are generally a useful factor to take into account when seeking a long-term
relationship.

Trygve
--
"It is better to have loved and lost than to have just lost."
From: tmcinern@newcomer.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Timothy McInerney x0 14-2)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Date: 29 Dec 92 21:57:55 GMT
Organization: Computervision Corp.

In article <1992Dec29.165301.15018@nynexst.com>, dtorok@nynexst.com (David Torok) writes:
|> : 
|> Shelley writes:
|> : "I'm surrounded by Christians", (an appropriate day to post this
|> : message, huh?!), _Please_ someone help me!!
|> :                             Shelley
|> 
|> tmcinern@newcomer.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Timothy McInerney x0 14-2) writes:
|> : 	Well, call me crazy Shelley, but did you ever consider dating someone
|> : 	who, (GASP), wasn't Jewish?
|> : 
|> : 	If you haven't, grow up and start living in the twentith century, 
|> : 	before it becomes the twenty first!
|> : 
|> : 	If you have and still insist on your archaic basis for mating, try
|> : 	Isreal.
|> 
|> I don't find wanting to limit "mating circles" based on ethnic, cultural,
|> religious, appearance or whatever to be "archaic."  It's a person's choice.

|> 
|> -=$>Dave<$=-
|> -- 


Bigot...
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 93 15:54:32 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque


>Why is it any more of a close-minded criterium then any other criteria like
>intelligence, humor, physical characteristc, geographic location, level
>of education, lifestyle compatibility, sexual preference, etc?

This argument, and others like it, smack close to hypocracy- 
Anybody remember the close-minded criterium of Mr. Wright? Your
arguments for religious restrictions in dating like that are identical
to Ed's arguments for his criterium.

Substitute that one lady's griping of dating material with 'educated' for
'jewish' and 'surrounded by health-nuts' for 'surrounded by christians'
and the two arguments would be identical.

And the argument against that is the same-
if you restrict yourself to a limited selection of dating material, then you
have no right to bitch that there is a lack of dating material that meets
your dating criterium.
r.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Fetishes?
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 92 07:13:43 GMT

In article <274@cnmhnet.UUCP> keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard) writes:
>In article <1992Dec22.201616.21392@netcom.com> cocoa@netcom.com writes:
>>Well, I also have this thing about whipped cream and toes.  Can't go much
>>Just me,
>>little 'e'
>
>Oh gosh!  Where were you six months ago??? I could fulfill your
>fantasy, provided those toes belong to feet size 6 or less. 

I've got a friend I ought to introduce you to--she's got cute little
feet, size 5EEE.  She can do tricks with them too--I haven't actually
seen a demonstration, but she claims to be able to crack walnuts 
between her toes.

Trygve
--
"All that glitters has a high refractive index."
From: loosemore-sandra@cs.yale.edu (Sandra Loosemore)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: re-announcement -- New Haven mini-boink
Date: 3 Jan 1993 08:56:07 -0500
Organization: staff hacker @ Yale Haskell project
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: functor.systemsz.cs.yale.edu

In case people missed last week's announcement....

A bunch of us are planning to get together here in New Haven next Saturday,
January 9.  Kiran and Michael will be here (all the way from the midwest)
along with some of the usual suspects from the Boston and NYC areas.  Please
join us if you can!  We're planning to see the dodo at the Peabody museum in
the afternoon, then go out for pizza at Sally's.

Send me e-mail if you want to be put on the list.

-Sandra
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: Duck and Jive (was Re: Pre-Sex Contract )
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 19:18:37 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.061414.16656@tdb.uu.se> t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:
>Michele Dall'Agata (dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov) wrote:
>: 
>: I don't use to read a lot what you post, but if you call the creation of a 
>: new life "production", you have problems. Big problems.
>Yes, why can't he use the established 
>American-Italian phrase "FUCK". 

Now *that's* funny.   :-)
-- 
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Nance Colucci                                      att!ihlpl!colucci
"It'll be better than before.  Yesterday's gone.  Yesterday's gone!"
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Spelling flames
Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 07:47:14 GMT

In article <93002.200733SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> Graydon <SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> writes:
>
>"Hypocracy" is the rule of syringes

A neologism?!  Bad boy!  Bad, bad boy!
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Virtual anniversary: 2 days ago
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: We're Being Repressed!!!!!
Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 18:39:04 GMT

In article <1992Dec24.105243.19047@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
>drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) responds to Pooh:
>>Notice the Represssion Inherent in the system!!!!
>>"Bring out your Dead! Bring Out Your Dead!"
>>"Some Watery Tart Lobbing a symatar is not ...."
>>"and Now, for something completely different....."
>
>"He's a lumberjack, and he's ok ..."

Nononononono!

"He's a programmer, and he's OK: he works all night and he sleeps all
day...."
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Virtual anniversary: 7 days and counting
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: rossi@mtu.edu (Rossi)
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Organization: Michigan Technological University
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 05:48:37 GMT

In article (Sandra Loosemore) writes:
>markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>
>   Cory Everson is perfection.  Cindy Crawford
>   looks too much like a frail girly woman.
>
>   Brinkley and Crawford are most certainly not perfect.
>

   In the general spirit of bashing plastik women:  

The only one of the regulars that you see on the runway I'd say
Turlington is my favorite.  Those prominent cheekbones and her
eyes are gorgeous...  Reminds me a lot of a childhood sweetie.
Plus she has the feline part down very well (I knew I could work
that thread in somehow ;)  *merp*

>This is interesting.  I have absolutely no clue as to who any of the
>people being discussed in this thread are, or what they look like.....

   S'ok, you'd need to tune in to the fashion shows on cable.  They
can be very stimulating at times ;) ;) :) :-) :-0

>-Sandra the hopelessly clueless

   I'd offer to share my Elmer's Clue All with you, but then what
would poor Elmer do?  Us guys we gotta stick together.

   songbird
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.pagan,alt.romance,alt.sex,alt.polyamory,talk.religion.misc
From: markbr%radian@natinst.com (markbr)
Subject: Re: Truth
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 18:14:47 GMT
Organization: n.o.y.b

In article <1992Dec29.040957.9673@nuscc.nus.sg> eng10172@nusunix1.nus.sg (POH HONG CHENG) writes:

(nothing deleted!!!)

Finally, an element of this idiot thread I can heartily endorse!!!

	mark
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Do you have a good pickup line?
Date: 31 Dec 1992 18:19:04 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <16153@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In a recent article it claimed that when men used "Hi" as an opening line
>it was successful 80% of the time.  When women used it the success rate was
>100%.

That would make "Hi" the worst pickup line there is.

A ideal pickup line should only receive a positive response from those who are
compatible, and a negative response from everyone else.  It's a great
time-saver.  As such, it should only have about a 1% or 2% success rate.
The higher the success rate, the worse the line.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Women: would you go out with a man dumber than you?
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 23:33:47 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.172504.29957@cbnews.cb.att.com> eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (eleanor.j.evans) writes:  (regarding the subject)
>
>I have to.

Does this mean that you can only stay in with men who are at least as smart
as you?

Trygve

--
"Nuclear weapons designers do it 'till they drop."

Newsgroups: soc.singles