From: hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.org (Bill Hardman)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: <None>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 92 14:00:49 PST
Reply-To: hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.org (Bill Hardman)
Distribution: world
Organization: Bark At The Moon Productions

> erichill@microsoft.com (Eric Hill) writes:

>> In article <JNqqTB2w165w@throb.mcws.fidonet.org> hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.o
>>> keith@balrog.dseg.ti.com (Keith A. Schauer) writes:
>>
>>> In article <024mTB3w165w@throb.mcws.fidonet.org> hardman@throb.mcws.fidone
>>>>
>>> Then why are there ethics officers and ethics organizations if ethics is
>>> completely self defined?  Would that mean that ethics are not reality ?
>>> (reality being the agreement of thetans, of course).
>>
>>This answer is self-explanitory.  There are levels of ethics
>>awarness.  If a person is able to correctly identify the area that
>>there is a problem in, there is no need for an ethics officer.  If
>>that person has mis-applied, or failed to correctly identify the
>>source of the area, then the ethics officer is used for guidance and
>>intervention in area of conflict.  An ethics officer is not an
>>'enforcer' in the context that they go around 'slapping hands' and
>>looking for situations of transgression.  They are councelors in a
>>specialized field.
>>
> Not true.  The "ethics" officer of any standardized group of 
> scientologists looks over the compiled statistics of the group
> and the output statistics of each individual in the group.
> He or she then actively tracks down anyone who has statistics
> lower than the preceeding week.  If the person being "handled"
> by the "EO" does not show improved statistics they are soon
> considered "ethics bait" and are then punished in accord with
> "scientology ethics tech".  Which starts with the individual
> having to write up thier private life for thier company.  
> That creates conflict of interest for the groups management
> and gives emotional and sometimes legal leverage to 
> scientology over the individual.  This is an inherantly 
> corrupt system.

FALSE.  The ethics officer does look over the statistics of all of
the individuals of the group.  The ethics officer also receives a
written condition from everyone in the organization for the
procedures the individual will use in the next week.  No one is
tracked down!  If a persons statistics are constantly falling, the
ethics officer will help the person "investigate" his/her actions to
determine if there is something the person is doing that is
inhibiting their ability to do their job, and handle it.  An action
of this type occurs in all companies, due to the simple fact, that
if an individual is not producing, he is wasting company materials
and assets.  Normally, in a non-scientology company, instead of
helping the individual, the person would just have his/her
employment terminated.

HAVING TO WRITE UP THEIR PRIVATE LIFE FOR THEIR COMPANY IS A TOTAL
LIE!

Where did you read that piece of garbage?  The action that you
have discribed is not a Scientology practice, and never will be.
For the purpose of honesty and truth, please post your reference,
hearsay evidence is not admissable.


Bill Hardman

------------------------------- :) -----------------------------------
   hardman = hardman@throb.uucp [modem (818) 352-6297]
                (Bark At The Moon Productions)
                        *A Secret Cult*
If you don't have anything nice to say....Say something Rude!!!!