HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Mailer: SCO System V Mail (version 3.2)
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Wed, 9 Sep 1992 06:54:31 METDST
From:         Masek <usarmase@SAVBA.CS>
Subject:      Re: "Re: Constitution of Slovak republic"

Dear Jan Szelepcsenyi,
     PLEASE DON'T USE MY NAME IN YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS.

Martin Masek, Bratislava
	Martin Masek, Institute of Construction & Architecture
	Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Czechoslovakia
	Phone: +42 7 378 2723 		    Fax: +42 7 372 494
		        email: usarmase@savba.cs
	======================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Sat, 5 Sep 1992 20:06:39 MDT
From:         Jan Szelepcsenyi <janszel@POSEN.MFF.UNIBA.CS>
Subject:      RE: Paradigm shift

Hi, Louise:

On Fri, 4 Sep 1992 21:50:31 EST, you wrote:

> I am wondering why the model of the peaceful split between Sweden and
> Norway is not cited in discussions of the split between Slovakia and
> the Czech Lands?  Why does Kamil and others warn of "sanctions against
> the Czechs and Slovaks?"  Why should there be a "loss of credibility
> in the eyes of the world community?"  It seems to me that Germany,
> Hungary and several other countries have already stated their intention
> of recognizing both Slovakia and the Czech Lands as successor states.
>
> Our discussion on the list has recently been directed to the past.  We
> need to look to the future.
>
> Louise Hammer

Thank you for this deliberate statement.
Why ? Because of the ratio is getting very seldom...


Jan

--
Jan Szelepcsenyi                        	Telephone: + 42 7 220863
janszel@posen.mff.uniba.cs              	Address  : ul. A. Mraza 4
                                                	   821 03 Bratislava
							   Czechoslovakia
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Sat, 5 Sep 1992 09:20:25 +0200
From:         Jan Szelepcsenyi <janszel@POSEN.MFF.UNIBA.CS>
Subject:      "Re: Constitution of Slovak republic"

Masek once wrote....

>Mr.Kubaska writes:
>>    With  good  deal  of  satisfaction  I  may  announce  to all
>>    contributors   of  Slovak-L,   that  the   first  democratic
>>    constitution  of  Slovak  republic   was  passed  in  Slovak
>>    parliament yesterday. The constitution start with:
>>    (... continue)
>
>However  this parliament  and this  government should  learn that
>there  is  a  couple  of  people  which  doesn't  agree with this
>constitution.

The desire that a solution of a problem represents not the
MAJORITY but the TOTAL number of citizen is a TOTALitarian one.
Don't worry about it, all of us are prisoners of a way of
thinking, which is poisoning our individual as well social
life...


> For  another  group  it  is  a  document  with  an
> indifferent content.

I'm affraid this statement is not a surprise, as you would
expect. In every society there is a lot of social groups for
which every kind of laws are "documents of an indifferent
content"... The acceptation of an juridical document by a
citizen is everytime a function of intelligency and moral. I'd
suppose that at least the part of the Slovak constitution
quoting the List of Human Rights had to be uderstood by every
newborn democrat...


>Subscribers of this list should learn that during the creation of
>first democratic  constitution a list  of "national enemies"  was
>elaborated;  the work  on list  continue.

Everything may happen...  For example a few weeks ago the police
in Bratislava detained a medical student acting as a drug dealer
who tried to sell cyanide packed like heroine. If you are
claiming about the elaboration of a *list of national enemies*
without any details - who elaborated it, was it an official
document, or not, what was the purpose of this list, was it
orderd by any governmental office or was it a private
inniciative etc., etc. - then there is no difference between the
drug dealer mentioned above and you. The main unsolved question
is the same, too: did the student know, what the real content of
the horrible package was or didn't he?

As I could learn from your address you are working at the Slovak
Academy of Sciences - the highest research institute in
Slovakia.  I suppose if you enter the area of policy or history
you have to keep the same rules saving the objectivity and
validity of information provide by you. Otherwise you are in
danger to sell poison as an "innocent" drug.


>What  do you think, Mr.
>Kubaska, about it?


I hope not only Mr Kubaska will express his opinion about this
way of presentation of political and social facts. If it is
going to be the generally accepted rule of this group, than it
has already lost its sense.


Jan

----
Jan Szelepcsenyi                        	Telephone: + 42 7 220863
janszel@posen.mff.uniba.cs              	Address  : ul. A. Mraza 4
                                                	   821 03 Bratislava
							   Czechoslovakia
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Mon, 7 Sep 1992 14:55:00 -0700
From:         Adolf Ceska <aceska@CUE.BC.CA>
Subject: Message to Stephen White

Stephen White, who is trying to sign off.

Stephen,

send your message to the listserv:

To: listserv@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu
Subj: listserv does not care about this line at all !!!
unsubscribe slovak-l

NO NAME after that line !!!

AC, Victoria, B.C., Canada

P.S., I tried to get to you directly, but could not reach you.
It would help, if you put your e-mail address at the end of your
messages, some systems just strip it off from the header.

aceska@cue.bc.ca
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Mon, 7 Sep 1992 09:39:02 EDT
From:         Stan Brunn <BRUNN@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Books
              5 Sep 1992 18:22:04 PDT from
              <lhdsy1!HOVMB.HOU281.CHEVRON.COM!TKMARC@UUNET.UU.NET>

Thanks for listing these two new books. I think one of the very useful contribu
tions those on the network can make is to bring to our attention important arti
cles and books, regardless of language. Stan Brunn
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Mon, 7 Sep 1992 23:57:59 MDT
From:         Milan PALUS <PCPMP@CSEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: "Re: Constitution of Slovak republic"
              7 Sep 1992 09:59:38 METDST from <usarmase@SAVBA.CS>

>    Only a short comment: It is  personal attack, or not? I have
>recognized that it is typical  for nationalists in Slovakia. That
>Martin Masek, Bratislava

Only a short comment:
Mr. Masek,
following this list for a longer time I must disagree with you.
Personal attacks are not speciality of SLOVAK NATIONALISTS only.
Respectfully,
M. Palus
From: jozef@bu.edu.bu.edu (Jozef Marsala)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Subject: Re: Addressing
Date: 9 Sep 92 14:05:38 GMT
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3


	Speed of delivery of mail is not affected by juggling the
name of the country. Railway as well as Czechoslovak Airlines are
still a federal institution.
	There is also something like ZIP (postove smerovacie cislo)
which is unique number for any location.
	I believe entry of "SLovak Republic" in one of the pre
vious messages ... was attempt to do something else than to
speed-up the delivery ... 
	Air mail from Boston (Massachusetts, USA) to KOSICE
(Slovakia ... for foreign readers only) takes 5 days.
	Surface mail takes 2-3 weeks.
	Air CARGO to RUZYNE airport 2-5 days.

	NOW read this:

		WIRE transfer of money from Boston to Prague
		takes about 4 hours ... AND

		WIRE transfer of money fro Boston to Kosice
		took 6 weeks ... (not once ... all the times !!!)
		of course, transfers within CS are very questionable.

		WIRE transfer from Kosice to my bussiness acct. in
		Boston takes on average 2-4 days.



						J.M.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 00:12:12 EDT
From:         George Frajkor <gfrajkor@CCS.CARLETON.CA>
Subject:      Re: Is there any e-mail address to Kosice?
              "NFPKP%AUDUCVAX.BITNET@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu" at Sep 7, 92 4:12 pm

NFPKP%AUDUCVAX.BITNET@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu writes:
>
> I am still having trouble getting off this list...I used the following
> commands...
>
> Send
> To:  IN%"Listserv@ubvm"
> Subj:  Signoff Slovak-L Stephen White
> No luck...any suggestions?
>
> Best,
> Stephen White
>
    On a signoff, you don't need your name.  Just the command
signoff slovak-l
Only on a subscription do you need the name.


    Jan George Frajkor
 School of Journalism                      _!_
 Carleton University,                     __!__
 Ottawa, Ontario                            !
 Canada K1S 5B6                             !
   -- gfrajkor@ccs.carleton.ca --          /^\
  613 788-7404     fax:613 788-5604    /^\/   \/^\
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 13:26:41 -0400
From:         jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU
Subject:      Re: Running MG without MAILER NAMES
Comments: To: Node Management <NODMGT-L@uga.cc.uga.edu>
              08 Sep 92 09:10:24 -0400. <9209081314.AA24519@Princeton.EDU>

> OK, now that we have "obsoleted" MAILER NAMES, how does one run MG?  If the
> file does not exist, it complains, and if I use the dummy file supplied
> as 9210, it complains that the file is not a names file.  Is there some way
> of specifying the options such that it will not look for MAILER NAMES

Try

   MG  node  XMAILER.NAMES DOMAIN.NAMES

and see if that fixes the problem for you.


   John
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: University of Connecticut Computer Center
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 09:25:58 EST
From:         John Hammond <MAILMNT@UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Running MG without MAILER NAMES
              8 Sep 1992 09:10:24 EDT from <TKSSTEVE@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>

On Tue, 8 Sep 1992 09:10:24 EDT Steven P. Roder said:
>OK, now that we have "obsoleted" MAILER NAMES, how does one run MG?  If the
>file does not exist, it complains, and if I use the dummy file supplied
>as 9210, it complains that the file is not a names file.  Is there some way
>of specifying the options such that it will not look for MAILER NAMES
I used the dummy file without any problem. I'm using Mailer 2.08's MG module.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1992 14:36:43 BRA
From:         ADOLFO@BRUFBA.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Apology

Caro LC,

obrigado pela lembranca...realmente a definicao e' otima!

Um Abraco,

Adolfo
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Vienna University Computer Center (VUCC)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 16:56:48 MEZ
From:         Erwin Halpern <NODADMIN@AWIUNI11.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Running MG without MAILER NAMES
              8 Sep 92 09:10:24 EDT from <TKSSTEVE@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>

On Tue, 8 Sep 92 09:10:24 EDT Steven P. Roder said:
>OK, now that we have "obsoleted" MAILER NAMES, how does one run MG?  If the
>file does not exist, it complains, and if I use the dummy file supplied
>as 9210, it complains that the file is not a names file.  Is there some way
>of specifying the options such that it will not look for MAILER NAMES
>
With VM-Mailer 2.08 if have no problem running MG with the supplied
MAILER NAMES

Greetings
Erwin


+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
I                                                                      I
I :userid.NODADMIN            :node.AWIUNI11        :net.BITNET        I
I                                                                      I
I   :name.Erwin M. Halpern                                             I
I                                                                      I
I   :addr.University of Vienna, Computing Center;                      I
I         Universitaetsstrasse 7;                                      I
I         A-1010 Wien;                                                 I
I         Austria                                                      I
I                                                                      I
I   :phone.+ 43 1 436111-424                                           I
I                                                                      I
I   :descr.Node Administrator for University of Vienna  (AWIUNI11)     I
I                                                                      I
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 13:11:37 CDT
From:         Barry Finkel <B19141@ANLVM.CTD.ANL.GOV>
Subject:      New Node BRCETESB

There is a new node in 9210 BRCETESB.  I was looking through the 9210 update
file to find a description for this node.  There is no description for this
node, neither in the type.NJE entry nor in the type.MEMBER entry.  Do we
want to update NEWTAGS (DE)SCRIPT to insure that there is a node description
in either the NJE, SITE, or MEMBER entry?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry S. Finkel
Computing and Telecommunications Division
Argonne National Laboratory               BITNET:   B19141@ANLVM
9700 South Cass Avenue                    Internet: B19141@ANLVM.CTD.ANL.GOV
Building 221, Room B223                   Phone:    (708) 252-7277
Argonne, IL   60439-4844                  Facsimile:(708) 252-5983
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Sun, 13 Sep 1992 09:51:29 IST
From:         Hank Nussbacher <HANK@VM.BIU.AC.IL>
Subject:      Re: Updated DOMAIN NAMES

Unless I have a finger check, I usually send a mail message after applying
the update to the sender stating that their request has been done.

Hank (domains@bitnic)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1992 09:30:58 EDT
From:         Larry Snodgrass <SNODGRAS@BITNIC.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Incorrect people tags in 9210

On Tue, 8 Sep 1992 01:07:09 +0200 Eric Thomas said:
>Last month I reported that some  people tags were incorrect - the address
>was that of  a nonexistent NJE node.  This has still not  been fixed (see
>VMNMDSC). Do I need to start bribing people with tins of surstroemming?
>
>  Eric

This month BITNIC will begin notifying techreps who have these people tags
in their node entries and we will continue to notify them until they are
fixed.

As long as we are on the subject of people tags I'd like to hear some
discussion about what to do with unreferenced people tags.  Unreferenced
people tags are defined in the nodes file but not referenced on any role
tag.  I believe EARN has decided to remove these tags from the nodes file.
Within BITNET there is some interest in providing a way to keep an
unreferenced people tag in the nodes file for future use.  One suggestion
was to allow a new role tag, say :unref, where one could put an unreferenced
people tag until the person returns from sabatical or whatever.

Larry
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Organization: Indiana University of Pennsylvania
X-Envelope-to: NODMGT-L@BITNIC.BITNET
X-VMS-To: NetMail%"NODMGT-L@BITNIC.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1992 16:24:00 EDT
From:         Mark_Strawcutter <MJSTRAW@IUP.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Updating DOMAIN NAMES

>How does one update their entry in DOMAIN NAMES and is there
>a deadline for updates (similar to updates for BITEARN NODES)?

Just send your request to DOMAINS@BITNIC.  It's a human, not an
automated process.  Don't know about deadlines, but I'm pretty sure
you have more than 10 days a month to make updates :-)

----------
Mark J Strawcutter                           BitNet:    MJSTRAW@IUP
Director, Systems and Communications         DNS (mx):  mjstraw@grove.iup.edu
Indiana University of Pennsylvania           Voice:     (412) 357-4000
Indiana, PA   15705                          "you can't nail jello to a tree"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Academic User Services, The University of Akron
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 15:56:47 EDT
From:         Gary Sponseller <SPONSELL@AKRONVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Running MG without MAILER NAMES
              8 Sep 1992 14:18:29 EDT from <TKSSTEVE@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>

On Tue, 8 Sep 1992 14:18:29 EDT Steven P. Roder said:
>On Tue, 8 Sep 1992 13:26:41 -0400 <jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU> said:
>>Try
>>
>>   MG  node  XMAILER.NAMES DOMAIN.NAMES
>>
>>and see if that fixes the problem for you.

>Thanks John, that did it.  Don't know why I didn't just try that myself.

Just a small note, I use:  MG AKRONVM
and it works fine (with the latest MAILER NAMES file.) :-)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Sep 1992 12:00:50 EDT
From:         Larry Snodgrass <SNODGRAS@BITNIC.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Updating DOMAIN NAMES

On Thu, 10 Sep 1992 16:24:00 EDT Mark_Strawcutter said:
>>How does one update their entry in DOMAIN NAMES and is there
>>a deadline for updates (similar to updates for BITEARN NODES)?
>
>Just send your request to DOMAINS@BITNIC.  It's a human, not an
>automated process.  Don't know about deadlines, but I'm pretty sure
>you have more than 10 days a month to make updates :-)

For more information on this request the file DOMAIN GUIDE from your
local NETSERV or LISTSERV@BITNIC (it doesn't mention deadlines).

Larry
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1992 16:17:29 EDT
From:         "Duane D. Weaver" <WEAVER@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
Subject:      Updating DOMAIN NAMES

How does one update their entry in DOMAIN NAMES and is there
a deadline for updates (similar to updates for BITEARN NODES)?

Duane
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 01:07:09 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Incorrect people tags in 9210

Last month I reported that some  people tags were incorrect - the address
was that of  a nonexistent NJE node.  This has still not  been fixed (see
VMNMDSC). Do I need to start bribing people with tins of surstroemming?

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: State University of New York at Buffalo
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 09:10:24 EDT
From:         "Steven P. Roder" <TKSSTEVE@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>
Subject:      Running MG without MAILER NAMES

OK, now that we have "obsoleted" MAILER NAMES, how does one run MG?  If the
file does not exist, it complains, and if I use the dummy file supplied
as 9210, it complains that the file is not a names file.  Is there some way
of specifying the options such that it will not look for MAILER NAMES

Thanks,

Steve Roder
(tkssteve@ubvm.bitnet | tkssteve@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu | (716)636-3564
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1992 16:28:12 EDT
From:         "Andrew T. Robinson" <ROBINSON@BITNIC.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Updating DOMAIN NAMES

>>How does one update their entry in DOMAIN NAMES and is there
>>a deadline for updates (similar to updates for BITEARN NODES)?
>
>Just send your request to DOMAINS@BITNIC.  It's a human, not an
>automated process.  Don't know about deadlines, but I'm pretty sure
>you have more than 10 days a month to make updates :-)
>
   If this is a swipe at UPDATE, it missed :-)

   1.  DOMAINS *is* automated--it's running GONE and just forwards
       files and mail to our DOMAIN NAMES maintainer.

   2.  As with DOMAINS, you can submit updates to UPDATE 365 days
       a year.  Unlike DOMAINS, with UPDATE you can see the effects
       of your changes at *least* 10-15 days per month with a reasonable
       level of feedback during the remainder.  With DOMAINS the only
       way you know whether your update was applied is when the next
       DOMAIN NAMES comes out--no feedback at all, that I'm aware of.

Andy
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: State University of New York at Buffalo
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 14:18:29 EDT
From:         "Steven P. Roder" <TKSSTEVE@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Running MG without MAILER NAMES
              8 Sep 1992 13:26:41 -0400 from <jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU>

On Tue, 8 Sep 1992 13:26:41 -0400 <jwagner@PRINCETON.EDU> said:
>> OK, now that we have "obsoleted" MAILER NAMES, how does one run MG?  If the
>> file does not exist, it complains, and if I use the dummy file supplied
>> as 9210, it complains that the file is not a names file.  Is there some way
>> of specifying the options such that it will not look for MAILER NAMES
>
>Try
>
>   MG  node  XMAILER.NAMES DOMAIN.NAMES
>
>and see if that fixes the problem for you.
>
>
Thanks John, that did it.  Don't know why I didn't just try that myself.


Steve Roder
(tkssteve@ubvm.bitnet | tkssteve@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu | (716)636-3564
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 15:02:02 LCL
Reply-To:     DSARGENT@UTFSM
From:         "Douglas Sargent (The Bug)" <DSARGENT@UTFSM.BITNET>
Subject:      RE:Using MG with new mailer names

Hi all,

    If U have an AFD that distributes a file with a comment attached to
it, it will scramble MG, unless it starts a comment.
    U must delete the first line of MG NAMES if it is a comment.

The Bug

PD : I always forget to delete the line, and get the error message,
 NOT A NAMES FILE, i delete the line and it works.

Bug
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 10:28:02 MET
From:         Ulrich Giese <U001213@HNYKUN11.URC.KUN.NL>
Subject:      Re: Incorrect people tags in 9210

On Tue, 8 Sep 92 01:07:09 +0200 Eric Thomas said:
>
>Last month I reported that some  people tags were incorrect - the address
>was that of  a nonexistent NJE node.  This has still not  been fixed (see
>VMNMDSC). Do I need to start bribing people with tins of surstroemming?

last month ? i even thaught it was some months earlier. anyway i will leave
the answer to Larry...

-ulrich-
>
>  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"innopac%maine.bitnet@vm.usc.edu"
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Mon, 14 Sep 1992 12:18:00 -0700
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         BGIANAKOS@ROCKY.CLAREMONT.EDU
Subject:      Serials module and newspaper checkin

We would like to hear from libraries that are using the serials control
module to checkin newspapers.  What special problems, if any, have you
encountered due to the frequency, for example?  What solutions have
you come up with.
Thanks for your response.
Please reply: IN%"bgianakos@rocky.claremont.edu"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Mon, 14 Sep 1992 13:52:08 CDT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         shelly <SHELLS@UKANVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Bar Code Labels
              14 Sep 1992 13:32:04 -0500 from <zzreim@ACC.WUACC.EDU>

We use two barcodes on books and bound journals.  We only use one barcode for u
nbound journals or reserve material.  We find the double barcode useful for che
cking out and counts.  Having to open an unbound journal is no big deal on time
.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Sat, 5 Sep 1992 10:15:42 PDT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         Sue-Hong Chou <shchou@CCMS.NTU.EDU.TW>

SET INNOPAC NOMAIL
   SHCHOU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU