HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: What a *Macho* really is...
Date: 26 Jan 93 16:16:27 GMT
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov


	Dear Moana and all the women, 
I see that there is a lot of confusion about the meaning of 
Macho. But, since I am a nice guy, I will explain what a 
Macho is for your pleasure:

A macho is romantic.
A macho is hot.
A macho is charming.
A macho *loves* women.
A macho *respects* women because he respects a lot his 
  mother.
A macho respects his lady also because she will be the 
  mother of his children (2 o 3).
A macho has only one woman per time.
A macho doesn't do houseworks, because *his mother* did not 
  want to teach him how to do them (tipical of italian guys), 
  but if he lives alone, he trys to learn.
A macho doesn't ask and doesn't pretend that a woman do the 
  house works for him. He doesn't need that. A macho is so 
  charming that his lady offers herself to do such a job.
A macho never looks for an housewife (housekeeper), he looks 
  for the right woman. 
A macho thinks that sex is something wonderful and beautyful.
A macho likes bitchies because they do great sex.
A macho doesn't fuck just for fucking with his lady. A macho
  makes love with her
A macho doesn't think that his lady is an object, he thinks 
  she is his a princess.
A macho is not a son of a bitch.
A macho protect women from the Dumbasses.
A macho is not spineless.
A macho likes when his lady does things for him.
A macho likes to stay with the friends, but he lets his lady 
  to go out with the other women, even if he trys to avoid 
  this.
A macho is not a moron. He doesn't let his lady to go out 
  with other guys
A macho is jealous a lot because he loves his lady alot.
A macho without a lady always looks for women because he loves 
  them.
A mucho looks at the other women because he likes women
A mucho is not offensive with a woman if she is not 
  offensive with him.
A macho can get easily angry.
A macho never hits women.
A macho likes to joke about sex, because it is funny.
A macho doesn't give a shit about formality. He is a 
  fun, free guy.
A macho is a real man, all the others are spineless.

   Did I forget something, Moana?

	Michele

Yes, I am macho, so?
From: Kevin Walsh <kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Graley's crap never stops
Date: 26 Jan 93 12:58:44 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <35769@olympus.wustl.edu> moaner@darla.wustl.edu (Moaner Lombardi) writes:
> STUCS204@IBM3090.BHAM.AC.UK writes:
> > You don't seem to use yours at all. Perhaps you could sell Mona your life
> > in return for,say 50p. I know your life is worth more than that as it has
> > never been used but youve covered it in all sort of putrid stains so I
> > would say that 50p for shopsoiled goods is pretty reasonable.
> >
> I couldn't agree less with you, Richard. *fifty* p???!!!
> Did you made a typo (p == c)???
> 
What makes you think that "c" should be the correct symbol
to use to refer to pence?  I would have thought that "p"
is much more appropriate.

I suppose we should take it that you don't believe their
are other countries outside America; therefore their are no
currencies other than the US$.  It is sad - no really.
Don't you watch the news.  Where did you think Iraq was?
Washington?

You ought to get away from your terminal for a bit.  Maybe take
a holiday somewhere other than momma's house.  Maybe you could
go to wopland where, supprise suprise, you'll find that you can
change $1 for 100,000,000,000 Lira - All in 10 Lira notes!

Why is it that you insist on using 300 "?" and "!" marks when
one will do?

'Nuff said.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     Professor Kevin Walsh
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Republican Losers
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 06:02:27 GMT

In article <1993Jan24.221508.4684@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
> Well, at least the American people will get to try this system for a while.
> Then at the next election we get to decide between that and the Virtual
> reality brainwash, white bread and mirror dazzlefest, drug pedalling,
> money worshipping, white trash televangelist pigs of our other esteemed
> party, representing the United Ignoreland of AmeriKKKa.

Unfortuately we have been in the gripped failures of liberalism since the
beginning of the "Great Society", if you remember that lunacy. Should Jack Kemp
run, we can free ourselves from the failed prophecies of liberalism without the
extremism of the "Religious Right". Until then we must endure the lecherous,
adulterous, dope smoking, tax and spend, spineless, Big government, baby
killing, Jeffrey Dahmer saving, Tree hugging, Kill the humans to save an owl,
Draft Dodging, Doom and Gloom, Anti-Prosperity, Anti-Profit, Anti-Business, God
fearing, "Peace in our time", Welfare loving, government dependency founding,
Liberal administration that you've managed to elect.
 
> Sounds like a blue light special to me.

Yeah. And all the quality of K-Mart too.

--The Phantom
From: martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: ANOTHER CANADIAN C+O+C+K+R+O+A+C+H <===============
Summary: Canadians infest the net
Keywords: cockroach, arsehole, canadian fuckboy, archive boy jr.
Date: 25 Jan 93 00:11:50 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Distribution: alt
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA


[GRALEY / DALLAGATA LIKE RANTING AND VOMITING CRUSHED]

>-- 
>		 John Henders
>		 Vancouver,BC

Another alt.canadian.fuckwad (tm) (c) <=== Pay attention Michele!!!

So, they are un hibernating. They are coming out of there little teepees
up north and shaking there little pee pees at The World Rulers, The Americans.

Fuck off snowman. 


~THE BETTER NAME (tm) (c) <==== Pay attention Michele!!!
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: ProLife, ProMurder, ProCrime And Iraq
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:41:49 GMT

In article <1993Jan20.181509.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:

>
>Irrelevant. Bill Cretin has had more scandals in one life than most Republicans
>combined. Fact the fact Rob, Democrats are Slime. Democrats are, Jesus, they
>have fucking Diane Feinstein. Barbra Boxer is a Dem. Donna Schlala is a Dem.
>They have all appeared on Dykes-R-Us and Donahue. 'Nuf said.

o, horeshit. what party was the only president to b impeached? hint: starts
with an R, and he was not convicted.

what party had the only president to resign? hint: starts w/ r

iran-contra
ed meese
inslaw
nofzinger
deaver
etc etc. not to say that the dems arent slime bags, but the republicans
are just as slimy, if not worse.

"I will have the budget balanced by 1983"-Reagan in 1980


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: Mark B.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: jeff tries again
Date: 26 Jan 93 20:40:21 GMT
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department


In article <1993Jan26.134832.14058@bsu-ucs> 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>In article <1993Jan23.032146.12108@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan22.163342.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>>>In article <1993Jan22.212303.5622@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:


>> Well, I felt the subject header said it all, 
>
>I agree, my insulting flames agains you and you homosexual >lovers leave you speachless.

Why do you and the other weak flamers in this group continually
bash homosexuals? What have you got against them, Jeff? Do you know that what you are doing is *illegal*? Do you want to end up
like the Troll - having your net privileges restricted for
posting stuff about "lazy niggers" and "ragheads"? 

I'd like to hear your opinions on why homosexuals shouldn't be
allowed into the military (besides the fact that you and your
homophobic buddies will beat them to a pulp that is).

>>and more or less prevented twitty from continuing his holy war, 
>Holy war? Where did I mention religion, asshole?!? You must be >an Iraqi Muslum bastard like Ragweed Ghandi.

Its no wonder you always win the alt.flame.marshmallow award,
Jeff. Jagdeep is a U.S. citizen with just as many rights as you
have and yet you continually make fun of him just because of his
name and his background. Pathetic, Jeff.

>>since he would probably die if we all stopped talking to him. 

>Actually I would be quite pleased. It would mean you have >accepted defeat.

Jeff, *YOU* seem to have accepted defeat after your fellow grunt
Spencer flamed you to a crisp... lesse, what was it he said about
you...

>To J. Twitty Army ROTC ("Proud Soldier..........")
>MISTER Twitty. Since when does an ROTC 2LT wannabe qualify as a >"soldier" anywhere? Your a godamned 'cruit pussy who knows >nothing.. NOTHING..about being a soldier. 

Yep. That about sums it up. Took you a 9 count to get up off the 
mat, Jeff. You're slipping.

Mark B. :-)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: Mark B.
Subject: Re: A day in the life of: JEFF WITTY
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:06:24 GMT


In article <katherim.727733043@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>
>>> Mark B. 
>>> a.k.a. PROUD CIVILIAN OF THE FROSTY CANADIAN NORTH
>
>>Ha! Loser. Enjoy the cold beer, cold woman and polar bears. Cheers asshole!
>
>Would you rather have warm beer?  Cold woman.  Trust me, there's more than
>one of us up here, and it's actually rather hot right now.  Polar bears?
>I think I've seen one on TV....

I saw one up in Churchill last year. Poor Jeff has to consult 
his crusty back issues of National Geographic to see any
wildlife these days because trigger-happy Americans like him have killed off all indigenous American fauna.

BTW, we've got all your Bald Eagles too, Jeff. They couldn't
handle the Army using them for target practice any more.

>>JEFF TWITTY
>>ARMY R.O.T.C. (Ripping Off The Chimpanzees) 
>>a.k.a. WARM, SUN LOVIN', CHECKING OUT THE NEAR NAKED GIRLS...

You can look, Jeff - but ya can't touch!

Mark B. :)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: haushalt@research.nj.nec.com (Robert C.Haushalter)
Subject: Where is Jagdeep?
Originator: haushalt@iris64
Organization: NEC Research Institute
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 13:57:39 GMT

On Thu, 28 Jan 1993 03:34:22 GMT Andy says:

>What, you think I'm going to start defending the IRA because I'm part 
>Irish? I'm also English, French, and Indian.
					^^^^^^

Could this somehow be connected with the disappearence of

		JAGDEEP SAHNI?????

Just think about it.
-- 
The opinions are mine..not my company's.
Actually, everything is more complicated
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Michele figures it out (Was Re:Intellectuals & women)
Date: 21 Jan 93 12:33:09 GMT
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan20.193133.1@acad.drake.edu>, vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
> In article <1993Jan20.161528.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>> FUCK! WHO IS THIS MORON THAT SPEAKS LIKE A FALSE INTELLECTUAL 
>> WHILE HE HAS *NO* MIND?!?!?
> 
> Easy! It's YOU! ;-)
> 
Bzzzz! WRONG! You lost. 

Another example of your clueless mind. };-O o==8

> --The Phantom
> 
	Michele
From: Kevin Walsh <kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Get a dictionary.  What a net.twat!
Date: 22 Jan 93 16:21:00 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <21596@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> ez012344@chip.ucdavis.edu writes:
> In article <1993Jan19.133421.13805@bsu-ucs> 01jwwitless@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
> >I was a Fullbright Scholarship Award winner, that means ...
> 
> Hmm, how do you spell Fulbright?
>
If you aren't sure you should either get a dictionary or ask your
mother to proof read your posts for you.

Asking questions like this on alt.flame - what a twat.  What do
you think this is?  a net.dictionary?  What's the point?  You'll
probably end up with Michelle answering for you.  The embarrassment.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     Professor Kevin Walsh
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a la 400ci)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: FAMOUS FLAMES
Date: 24 Jan 93 00:50:22 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <910.368.uupcb@filebank.cts.com> julie.larson@filebank.cts.com (Julie Larson) writes:

>Has anyone out there compiled a compendium of noteworthy flames and
>snappy comebacks?

If they have, no one has bothered to use it :-)

.
 -----------Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS--------
 ObQuotes:
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
 "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

    Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Intellectuals & women
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 21:30:47 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.133840.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>You made a bad job, "intellectual", sometime you conveniently deleted 
>the reason for which I think/feel in this way. You'll see.

Ha. Ha. Is this some kind of accusation?

>
>In article <1993Jan22.223525.7628@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan22.115547.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>>>
>> Oh GOD, an extremist.  Let's think logically...shall we?  There will
>> always be children in this world.  Always.  Never have I espoused the
>> end of population.  But, of course, it's all black and white for you.
>> I forget you are incapable of flexing your puny mental muscle.
>> 
>So, why DID YOU DELETE THE FACT ABOUT ITALY THAT'S HAVING 
>LESS CHILDBIRTHS THAN DEATHS?!?!? Because it was against 
>your fucking point?!? Bull shit, man! A big one.

Why did I delete that???   Because Italy's population growth has exactly
zero bearing on whether I think you are a cretinous pus-wad.  I don't
care about Italy's population growth!!!  It has no bearing on how I felt.
If Italy dies out because you all have pitiful hygiene and you keep
spreading herpes through your right to rape campaign, I don't care!
Besides, a negative population growth does not mean the Italian women
are not having enough babies...it could mean that you all are drinking
shit in your water, forgotten how to bathe, bloodfarting excessively, etc.

It was a completely irelevant point, which still has nothing to do with
your claim that pregnancy is a priority for women, and my statement that
it isn't.

FOOL!


>
>[everything deleted, because I am tired of that. Wait to 
>flame, you'll see]

Oh, I see.  The fucking truth is that I cut your point of view and logical
scheme into a million pieces!!  To embarrassed, to relive your mountainous
defeat?!  It seems so.
From: an6882@anon.penet.fi
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: disclaimer
Date: 26 Jan 93 05:52:00 GMT
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: alt.flame

X-Anon-To: alt.flame

In articles <1jpa55INNcsa@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk 
(Mr Jism Swallower Graley) writes:

>Fuck off you shit-sucking mother-fucking moronic piece of crap, 
>michelle.

I am soory Graily.  I did not knew you did incest with youre mama.  I will 
stay away from close familys like yours.  I hope you can believe me of not 
touching your mama so you may returned to youre old activities with her.

>|
>|Apathetic.
>|
>|	Michele
>
>Damn right you are.

Yes but I dont care.

>~THE GREAT LAME
            ^
Nise sig!  Ha Haha ha ha hah ha hah hahh, MORON!

        Michele


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: ProLife, ProMurder, ProCrime And Iraq
Date: 22 Jan 93 05:57:11 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1993Jan21.191054.25150@research.nj.nec.com>, haushalt@research.nj.nec.com (Robert C.Haushalter) writes:
> In article <1993Jan20.181509.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>>In article <1993Jan20.214312.25380@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>>
>>> So, perhaps you long for the days of naughty nancy? 2 1/2 months pregnant
>>> as she strolls down the aisle w/ronnie, formerly known for giving the
>>> best blow jobs in hollywood? or how about jim bakker--he was a republican...
>>
>>Irrelevant. Bill Cretin has had more scandals in one life than most Republicans
>>combined. Fact the fact Rob, Democrats are Slime. Democrats are, Jesus, they
>>have fucking Diane Feinstein. Barbra Boxer is a Dem. Donna Schlala is a Dem.
>>They have all appeared on Dykes-R-Us and Donahue. 'Nuf said.
>>
>>--The Phantom
> 
> Phantom:  before I ask you if you think our founding fathers and jesus were 
> liberals or conservatives I'd like to get some important information from 
> you republicans.
> 
Only a true ass like yourself would come up with such a stupid question.

> Do you know why they didn't have reagan give a family values speech at 
> that fascist-fest republican convention?  He could have told them about his 
> divorce, marrying the pregnant Nancy the Astrolger, his gay son, and his 
> daughter that won't talk to him.  These are the real family values of 
> republicans.
> 
Ohhhh! Been reading the Enquirer lately, yes? Your reading level could not
extend any further than that, illiterate newt.

> Perhaps you could also tell me about the Jim Bakker/Jerry Falwell/Pat 
> Robertson crowd:
> 
> (1)  Do you get a discount with the prostitutes if you're a minister on one of 
> the televangelist shows?

Not sure. Ask your mother. She is a whore. 
>                              
> (2)  Is it really cheaper to pay a prostitute to watch you "choke your 
> chicken" instead of having sex or do you just pay by the hour?
> 
Again, ask mother dearest.

> (3)  We could ask jim bakker but i can't remember which prison he's in.
> 
> Please let me know.   Thanks   Kneel and Bob
> 
hee-hee.
> -- 
> The opinions are mine..not my company's.
> Actually, everything is more complicated		

JEFF WITTY
ARMY R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY
From: Cannam@sc.ZIB-Berlin.de (Chris Cannam)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: FAMOUS FLAMES
Date: 25 Jan 93 15:03:51
Organization: Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum fuer Informationstechnik Berlin
Distribution: alt
	<1993Jan22.220451.6785@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: borodin.zib-berlin.de
In-reply-to: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU's message of Fri, 22 Jan 1993 22:04:51 GMT


In article <1993Jan22.220451.6785@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:

   > julie.larson@filebank.clitoris.com (Julie Larson)  writes:
   >Has anyone out there compiled a compendium of noteworthy flames and
   >snappy comebacks?

   no. fuck you.

I preferred "fuck your mama, asshole, the pussy eater bitch".


--
           on sighting mathematicians it should unhook the algebra from their
             minds and replace it with poetry;  on sighting poets it should
               unhook poetry from their minds and replace it with algebra

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Read this, please. Another sysadmin problem.
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 03:04:54 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.145506.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>This is real serious.
>---------------------
>
>There is a moron that send anonymous mail, or what the fuck 
>I don't know, directly to my workstation, to a guest account.
Hey asshole, don't worry...it's probably one of your "supporters", displaying
the same ineptitude that made you a net.loser.
>
 Whoever was sending mails to a "guest" 
>account at faglab is warned.
I'm sure our anonymous poster is shaking in his boots...
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Beer, me Mason!
Date: 27 Jan 1993 18:11:16 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <1993Jan26.143538.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
|In article <1k23hnINNo24@clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
|> You have accused me of a "copy-cat" flame, and then proceeded to use the 
|> phrase "You FUCKING FUCKED FUCK OF A FUCKING FUCK"
|> 
|> Fascinating.
|
|Once again you prove, by preponderence of the evidence, that you are by far the
|most cluless of ALL on the net. My posting is the very innuendo to which you
|refer. THANK-YOU moron, you prove on your own that you are completely lacking
|of a  slightest grasp of what innuendo or subtlety means. Graley, you are far
|too stupid to continue any sort of arguement. That is fascinating, isn't?

Isn't what?

That would have been a moderately good flame, if you hadn't accidentally missed
the last word out. Gee and all that talk of stupidity, too. I guess you'll say 
you were trying to be 'ironic' or 'subtle' by deliberately fucking up. Let me
give you a description slightly closer to the mark... 'dumb as fuck'

The only irony in your postings is that which results from your incredible
paranoia. In being _so_ desperate to look like a good flamer, you simply end 
up embarissing yourself, as in the above posting. Also, if you had had the 
common sense to not try and hide your name 'Vinson', people would be used to 
it. But no, you were too paranoid. You hoped you could protect yourself by
talk of 'net-iquette'. Now you are exposed, and you are in fear. Fear that your
whole life (i.e. alt.flame) will come crashing down around you.

It kinda looks like _you_ are the 'far too stupid' one doesn't?

                                                       ^^^^^^^^
NOTE IRONY... You see I can do it. I just don't often, because it's boring.

>--The Phantom (aka BIG BAD VINSON)

~THE GREAT NAME

-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: alwalsh@unix1.tcd.ie (Andreas Walsh)
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 11:56:06 GMT

In <1993Jan24.125655.24608@physchem.ox.ac.uk> pete@physchem.ox.ac.uk (Pete Biggs) writes:


>In article <katherim.727666304@sfu.ca>, katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>> There IS a difference, trust me.  Watch who you are flaming, or you may
>> find the combined wrath of all Welsh, Scottish and Irish upon your head.
>> 
>> KMM

>And we are supposed to be frightened by this?  Bring back Offa's dyke
>and Hadrian's Wall to keep all those celts out of here.


Tiocfaidh ar la.      

 
--
"You need the dark to see the stars."
Newsgroups: alt.flame