From: williamf@umbc1.umbc.edu
Subject: RE: alt.personals and enforced monogamy
Organization: University of Maryland Baltimore County
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 19:24:40 GMT

In a previous article, cd975@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Daniel K. Holmes) wrote:
> 
>In a previous article, mike_steiner@qm.claris.com (Mike Steiner) prattles
   vapidly:
>>> In article <15036@claris.com> mike_steiner@qm.claris.com (Mike Steiner) 
    defender of God knows what says:
>>
>>>>Considering that he is providing a *free* service for those people to whom he
>>> 
>>How do you know what he would probably do?  The fact that he does it without
>>charging is indicative that he wouldn't charge.  Your close-minded bigotry is
>>really showing in that sentence.  What other gems of hypocricy will be coming from
>>your keyboard next?
>>
>>He isn't enforcing anything on anyone!  *You*, on the other hand, are certainly 
>>trying to enforce yours on him.  You're lying about this speaks more about you
>>than anything that I or anyone else can say about you.
>>
>Excuse me........... Mike, you ignorant slut. Have you had any correspondence

    Really!! C'mon.  Comparing Mike 'S' to an ignorant slut is a slur upon 
    the slut.  At least sluts don't paid for their services.  Mike 'S' MUST 
    be getting some kind of moral high from his sermonizing.

>with Darryl? Or you married or in any way being discriminated by this service?
>If you answered no to either of these questions.........Shut the hell up!!
>The topic does not concern you and therefore you should not have a voice.
>Unless you have personally talked with Darryl, quit throwiong your "bigotry"
>bullshit around. I have taked with Darryl, and yes, all comments are correct.
>Give us facts, dipshit, not just hit the airwaves with your "you communist" 
>crap. You sound like Pee Wee Herman with this, no he's not, you are trash.
> 
>Darryl does decide what "he feels" should be posted or not. He will turn a
>married person down who just wants to find pen-pals, and then post about a 
>cross-dresser wanting to "entertain" men, regardless of their marital status.
> 
>So MIke, get down off your soapbox, and try and learn some things before you get 
>all up in arms. You look like an ass to those of us that do have the facts.
> 
  Amen.  I tried to stay out of this round of ACS criticism but I couldn't 
  resist this.  Darryl is a big boy:  let him defend himself.  Mike jumps to 
  his defense and says......nothing.  The fact is many of Darryl's critics 
  have been around this group for a while and don't want see creeping 
  intolerance and censorship seep in.  If Darryl wants to run an ACS, and let 
  me say one is needed, then he ought to be true to the history of the group
  and run it as openly as legally possible.   When Mike 'S' returns fire upon
  somebody who critizes ACS by calling then a BIGOT with all the baggage that
  that entails, thats really just inflaming emotions.  Its not easy to muster
  the available resources AND willingness to run an ACS and I don't want to see
  the current ACS drift away w/o a replacement BUT, I do think it better not
  to have this one here in the hope that someone will step forward to fill the 
  vacuum than to have the current restrictive one running--I am NOT married
  for those who think that that is *my* motivation.
				Stay Easy___
				TheBigBopper
Newsgroups: alt.personals