From: kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: do Overpeck's flamers have problems themselves? (was: Overpeck's problems)
Summary: Another day, another irrevelant Kebbie quote...
Keywords: You expect me to mark my deletions?  Dream on...
Date: 4 Oct 92 14:29:28 GMT
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.

In article <1992Oct3.061432.4873@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>In article <1992Oct2.182010.21304@ncsu.edu> dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
>>In article <1ykzq+b@rpi.edu> cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:
>>
>>>rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla) writes:
>>
>>>>keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
>>
>>>>>rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla) writes:
>>
>>>>>> If you can't--or won't--perhaps you should consider retracting
>>>>>> the accusation.
>>
>>>>> sure i'll consider it. but i really don't think my position
>>>>> will change. why don't you ask cj? i'm curious if she'll
>>>>> tell you the truth.
>>
>>>> And I'm curious to see if you will have the intellectual honesty
>>>> to support your position--or retract it.
>>
>>> _I_ will support keegan's position on this.  But as keegan has posted
>>> that he does not want the details public again, you'll have to email
>>> me for the story.
>>
>>I e-mailed you for the story, and I'm still waiting to hear from you.
>>I also e-mailed Keegan for the story, but he explictly refused to give 
>>it to me.  Perhaps there is no "story". 

Perhaps James doesn't want pro-lifers "gloating" over the disagreements that
pro-choicers have, in the same way that you don't publically disagree with
other pro-lifers?

>
>As near as I can tell, this is the alleged "lie" that TSAKC is getting
>so frothed-up about:
>
>
>Subject: Re: Strange Bedfellows
>Message-ID: <1992May28.184105.26227@odin.corp.sgi.com>
>Date: 28 May 92 18:41:05 GMT
>
>>This is really unlike you-- you're usually more thoughtful than
>>this.  I know that Keegan used the mailing list to try to get
>>people to post in support of him.  Are you letting friendship
>>take precedence over thoughtfulness?  I'm sorry, Keegan!   I
>>like you, but I won't agree with you if I think you're wrong.

Where is the lie in this statement?  And *WHO* are you quoting here?

>
>I find it difficult to believe that this could even be _taken_ as a "lie",
>since it's reasonable to assume that SOMETHING was said on "the mailing list",
>and, beyond that, it's purely a matter of interpretation what its use was...

Where is the lie in this statement?  And *WHO* are you quoting here?

>
>Then, again, a "lie" tends to be whatever TSAKC wishes to call a "lie", I guess.

Well, the word "lie" was used in this statement, but I don't any actual lies
being told, do you, Kibbles?  And who are you quoting here?

>Has lack of veracity _ever_ impeded their agenda?

Ah, this must be the lie you're talking about.  While I'm not below flaming,
and I've even quoted Suxanne out of context once or twice, I've never posted
somthing that I know to be a lie to the net.  And neither have the other
members of TSAKC, as far as I know.

So if we can just find out who said the above statement, they can either 
prove their statement, or retract it.

(BTW Kibbles:  All the members of TSAKC routinely meet in a small town in
Kansas.  There, we take over a hotel, get rowdy for the weekend, and discuss
how we're going to further our plans for world domination.  Would you care
to buy a bridge to further the cause????)
--
=kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu | B(0-4) c- d- e++ f- g++ k(+) m r(-) s++(+) t | TSAKC=
=My thoughts, my posts, my ideas, my responsibility, my beer, my pizza.  OK???=
=National Coming Out Day is Oct 11th, 1992. Closets Are A Place To Put Clothes=