HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hernlem@chess.ncsu.EDU (Brad Hernlem)
Subject: Re: Terrorist Khomeini regime attacks an NLA Base
Reply-To: hernlem@chess.ncsu.EDU (Brad Hernlem)
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 17:53:10 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.154739.23690@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>,
mtaghavi@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Amir Taghavi) writes:
> In article <saied.702538216@odin> saied@odin.unomaha.edu (Saied*) writes:
> >
> >
> >According to the Mojahedin, the terrorist
> >Khomeini regime attacked one of the NLA bases
> >this morning. One NLA combatant was martyred.
> >Some buildings and military equipment were
> >damaged. One of the attacking planes was
> >downed and the pilot and co-pilot captured.
> >
> >The supporters of the Iranian resistance
> >in New York, Ottawa, and 16 other European
> >countries have attacked the terrorist nests
> >of the regime, setting the place afire, or
> >destroying regime's belongings.
> >
> >A demonstration is planned for Tuesday.
> >
> >The Leader of the Iranian Resistance has
> >sent telegrams to the UN Sec. General, 
> >members of the UN Security Council, and 
> >other UN bodies, condmening the attack.
> >
> >More details later.
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> 
>  Dear Mr(s.?) Saied*
> 
>  It seems to me that you have a great deal of information about MKO. 
>  Please give us 'More details' information on how/why/when MKO attacked
>  innocent Iranian villagers who live close to Iran/Iraq border. I read
>  something about that on Headlines News but it was not given on 'details'.
> 
>  Thanks in advance
>  Amir Taghavi*

I also heard that "supporters" of the MKO took a hostage in New York for
a while yesterday. These Mojahedin are doing a good job of demonstrating
what kind of people they are.
From: kamrani@ifi.uio.no (Kamrani)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: TEST
Date: 11 Apr 92 15:47:47 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway
Originator: in142-2@askenga.ifi.uio.no

this is a test.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: aref@Tehran.Stanford.EDU (Modda'iyeh har hAzer va Vakileh har ghAyeb)
Subject: Re: Electronic MoshA'aereh (why not :-)?)
Keywords: Poetry and more poetry
Organization: VezArateh Farhango-Honar 
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 19:51:28 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.193046.26302@EE.Stanford.EDU> mack@isl.Stanford.EDU (mack) writes:
>
>teer e mozhgAn e to az eynak e posht
>
>t bedeh, teyeh do noghteh!

to keh az koocheyeh ma'shoogheyeh man migozari,
			man ham az koocheyeh ma'shoogheyeh to migozaram

mim bedeh.



Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: towfiq@FTP.COM (Mark Towfiq)
Subject: Re: Reply to  Bahaies  gang
Reply-To: towfiq@FTP.COM
Organization: FTP Software, Inc., Wakefield, MA
	<1992Apr2.170153.13879@wuecl.wustl.edu>
	<1992Apr03.071552.23769@ecst.csuchico.edu>
	<1992Apr3.145929.10561@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 14:21:29 GMT

>>>>> On 3 Apr 92 14:59:29 GMT, fsameri@perch.lerc.nasa.gov (Ali
>>>>> Ameri) said:

aa>  Ahmad Kasravi has his own account of the events related to this
aa> subject in his book "Bahaiigary". It is a book worth reading.

  Just as I would not recommend to someone interested in Christianity
that they exclusively read Isaac Asimov's commentary of the Bible, I
would recommend that one look at a Baha'i source on the Baha'i Faith
as well.  One such recently published work is by William S. Hatcher
and J. Douglas Martin, called "The Baha'i Faith: The Emerging Global
Religion".  Also, the Encyclopedia Brittanica has a well-written
introductory article on the Baha'i Faith.
--
Mark Towfiq, FTP Software, towfiq@FTP.COM, W:+1 617 224 6275, H:+1 617 488 2818

Say: Rejoice not in the things ye possess; tonight they are yours, tomorrow
others will possess them....  The days of your life flee away as a breath of
wind, and all your pomp and glory shall be folded up as were the pomp and
glory of those gone before you.
		-- Gleanings from the Writings of Baha'u'llah
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: CCMAHTAJ@umcvmb.missouri.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Mosha'ereh Continued ...
Date: 17 Apr 92 19:30:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: mont.1992Apr17.194301.27476
Organization: University of Missouri, Columbia
From: bashir@acsu.buffalo.edu (Noushin Bashir)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: For Agh Seyyed!
Keywords: ghAfieh gar beh tang Ayad,...
Date: 17 Apr 92 02:31:28 GMT

>Hope I am not too late:
>
>alaa yaa ayohal-saaghee eder kasan va naavel-haa
>ke eshgh aasaan nemood aval valee oftaad moshkelhaa
>
>This is how we used to start the moshaa-ereh on the way to Shomaal in th
>car....
>
>So, I guess I am waiting for an alef ....

Here is an A-ye bA KolAh

AnAn ke keshandeh sharAbeh NAband
                AnAn ke be shab modAm dAr mehrAband
BeedAr yekee neest hameh dAr KhAband
                Bar Khosk yekee neest hameh bAr Aband


Anybody wants to take a dAl?
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: root@ncube.com (Operator)
Subject: Seyyed been seen
Organization: nCUBE HeadQuarters
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 19:26:20 GMT


Seyyed was last seen following his leader:



                    ____
                    /    \____________________
               ((((((((                       \
              <|O    O|>                BS    |\
                |    |                        | \_0_
                |d  b|                 \     /      \
                (-==-)  /               \__  |       *
                   \ |||\__________      _/\ |
                    ||||           VVVVVV  |||
                    ||||           :: :    \||







Captain Zod...
zod@ncube.com
From: saied@odin.unomaha.edu (Saied*)
Subject: Re: Terrorist Khomeini regime attacks an NLA Base
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 00:02:49 GMT

hernlem@chess.ncsu.EDU (Brad Hernlem) writes:
[stuff deleted]
>I also heard that "supporters" of the MKO took a hostage in New York for
>a while yesterday. These Mojahedin are doing a good job of demonstrating
>what kind of people they are. 
> 

Well, several comments about the "hostage" taking situation 
mentioned in Mr. Hernlem:

1. The supporters of the Resistance were unarmed. Their
   intentions was not to take hostages (how could five
   unarmed, tiny young men in their twenties or early thirties
   take three big men as hostages?). They wanted to call the
   attention of the world community to the terrorist Khomeini
   regime's attack on a Resistance base which they consider as
   the only hope of a nation.

   They destroyed the regime's belonging (e.g., computers,
   and documents) and spry painted the walls but did no harm to
   the Khomeini regime's diplomat-terrorists.

2. They left the Khomeini regime's mission without any demands.
   Hostage-takers, like the Khomeini regime and its terrorist
   supporters in Lebanon, take hostages to make demands.

   The supporters of the resistance had no demands; they harmed
   no one but destroyed as much as they could while inside
   the Khomeinii regime's terrorist/spy nest.

3. Mr. Hernlem should be reminded that the Khomeini regime is
   an illegitimate regime that has employed executions, torture,
   terrorism, and war to stay in power. This anti-human regime
   has been condmened by every major human rights organizations
   including the UN Commission on Human Rights each year
   during last 11 years. Niether the regime nor its
   terrorist-diplomats have any legitimacy.


Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: fayegh@cs.ubc.ca (David Fayegh)
Subject: Re: Electronic MoshA'aereh (why not :-)?)
Keywords: Poetry and more poetry
Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 04:27:44 GMT

aref@Tehran.Stanford.EDU (Modda'iyeh har hAzer va Vakileh har ghAyeb) writes:

>	to kaz mehnateh digarAn bighamy

>		nashAyad ke nAmat dahand Adamy

>yeh bedeh.

	yAd-e to konam delam tapeedan geerad
		khoonAbeh z-e deedeh-am chakeedan geerad

	har jA khabar-e doost reseedan geerad
		beechAreh delam z-e khod rameedan geerad

dAl please.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: ghaseminejad@skerth.usask.ca
Subject: CROOKS HIT IRANIAN EMBASSY AROUND THE WORLD
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 19:43:20 GMT

Once againe crooks Mojahedin started to demonstrate their show of wilderness
and foolishment as they used to do it always. They have attacked Iranian
embassies around the world, hiting employees and staffsl. The other day I
was watching TV. The sence of hitting an employees in Iranian embassy in
Australia remind me the Mojahedins affair when they were in Iran. They were
hiting the man and forcing him to say down with regim. Are they really fighting
with the rerim? As I remember they have never fighted with regim but with peopl
e. Inspite of these they still call themselve peoples mojahedin. When they were
in Iran they mostly attacked poor people, shoppers, sellers, workers,... and
called their victims as "HEZBOLLAHIS". They exploded bombs to kill people. They assasinated lots of people calling them regims sympaths and finally they lanch-
ed a military attack through the Tehrans street and caused the regim arrest and
ofcouse kill some of them and the rest of them fled for European countries.
Their great leader SHAH MASOOD VAJABI scaped for Paris and other staffs for
anywhere they could.  Finally GHAH MASOOD came to Iraq to help "his people
which were suffering Iraps bombardments???. He helped his people so much. WHO?
I tell you. He stablished military bases in Irap trained his staff and force
them to slip to the Iranian military and volanteer forces to collect informat-
ion and hand them in to the Irapi forces. When appropriated they even started
attackes aganist Iranian army and volanteers (BASIJ) which were fighing with
Iraq in the borders, and they were a real fifth colomn for Iraqi forces.
They continued all these in order to help their people?? which were suffering
Iraqis heavy bombardments.  When the peace came and they knew that no longer
they would be supperted by their master SADAM HOSEIN they launched a big attack
as they called it "FOROOGHE JAVEDAN "  to help their people and killed many
of ordinary people who were resisting against them in Shahabad (Isalam abad).
They even didnot stop at this step and continue to help the IRAQI KURDS by
killing them after they uprised to overthrow their master SADAM HOSEIN.
This time they started attack on  the Iranian embassies to help their people
too. Their show of wilderness was really like MOGHOLS CORPS when they attacked
Iran. So as far as I am concerned they have been helping people, no matter what
type of help it is. You know the word of HELP is arbitrary so it migh have
another meaning in the Mojahedins culture and it probably meand killing people.

                     PAYANDEH BAD IRAN AND ZENDEH BAD IRANIAN VATAN PARAST

                                         HASSAN
From: farah@vms.macc.wisc.edu (Lida Far)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: PERSIAN MEN
Date: 15 Apr 92 02:03:24 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center

Dear Readers,  I am a 21 year old woman attending UW Madison.  
Even though I have lived here for 15 years, I am still very interested and
in tune with my Persian culture.  But, I wonder about many things, expecially the doublst
the double standards which for the most part many Persian men hold in this
society regardless of how many years they have lived in America.  For
example, why is it that contrary to their belief that they are open-minded
, they object (and make a big deal out of) and are curious about a Persian
woman having her own social life (e.g. coffee and dinner) with a male friend.
They believe this, regardless of the fact that Persian men have their own share
of shall we say "extra-curricular" activities with many of their own female
friends.  I know that you cannot all be like this, but lately I have been
running into many who are.
From: bes@cco.caltech.edu (Behnam Sadeghi)
Subject: Re: Terrorist Khomeini regime attacks an NLA Base
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 05:06:56 GMT


Of course, the MKO is in no position to complain about Iran's 
attack on its military base.  The whole purpose of the so-called
National Liberation Army is to attack Iran.  Therefore, they
can expect Iran to strike at them.    

Saddam Hussain is in no position to complain either, as long
as he continues to support the MKO and allow them to attack 
Iran from Iraqi territory.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: sehari@iastate.edu (Babak Sehari)
Subject: Re: Terrorist Khomeini regime attacks an NLA Base
Originator: sehari@vincent1.iastate.edu
Organization: Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa.
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 17:46:52 GMT

In <saied.702780846@odin> saied@odin.unomaha.edu (Saied*) writes:

>baze@milton.u.washington.edu (Behzad) writes:

>>>Third, the Khomeini regime resorted to the same line of lies
>>>and baselss claims last year when it invaded Iraq. Many of the
>>>invading pasdars were killed or captured by the NLA combatants.

>>  Killing your own countrymen could be a source of pride. 

>Behzad, the above is the major source of flaw in your analysis
>and logic.

>The rapist and criminal pasdars invade Iraq to capture and kill
>the Mojahedin. (The captured pasdars revealed that their intention
>was to kill as many Mojahed as they could and take the rest back to
>Iran.) The Mojahedin resist and, in order to defend themselves, 
>they crush the pasdars. Now you call this "killing your countrymen!"

I know it might be news to you, but Iranian people do not give a damn
about Iraq! You bring the Iranian soldiers to level of criminals, the same
soldiers who protected Iran from being invaded by Saddam? Shame on you man,
Shame on you.  Now, you claim that killing Other Iranian, who do not
believe in your ideas is O.K., and when some one kick your butt you scream
like a hell!
" Mal mardom bebari-o cho Mal-at bebarand
                            Dad-o faryad bar Ari Ke mosalmani nest"!

>The Mojahedin do not consider the pasdars who rape young
>prisoners, who torture, who execute, who spry acid into women's
>face, who stone poor women, who have transformed Iran into

In other words it is O.K to violate the human right of others, but
you are the only people who have human rights!  

>a virtual hell, .., as their countrymen. You see, if it wasn't
>because of this evil regime and its criminal armed pasdars, even
>we would be back in our homeland with our families. What do you
>think has made so many of us Iranians to stay in the U.S. or in
>Europe? Why som many young iranians and so many brains have fled
>Iran? Was it because they were harassed by a pasdar or an
>akhound?

As far as I am concerned, if it was not because of you shah was still in
power, and everybody were back in the country.

>>>To justify its humulating defeat, the regime claimed that the

>>  Sheeah, right!!  The Mojahedeen have no power..  face it!!

>The very fact that the Mojahedin have build a strong army and
>have stood up against the most cruel regime and the fact that they
>have never given up the fight to free the prople and to overthrow
>the evil Khomeini regime is very encouraging and promising.

What you call Mojaheadine army, is just a "provisional Army", which is 
controlled by Saddam!

      With highest regards for all the Iranian who died to defend Iran
                       Babak  Sehari.
From: ohrd!nbadie@cs.toronto.edu (Navid Badie)
Subject: Re: Electronic MoshA'aereh (why not : -)?)
Organization: "Ontario Hydro - Research Division"
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 14:23:58 GMT

derek@locus.com (Dariush Keyani-Yazdi) writes:
: 
: dast az talab nadAram tA kAm-e man bar-Ayad
: 			   yA tan resad be jAnAn yA jAn ze tan bar-Ayad
: bogshAy torbatam rA ba'd az vafAt-o  bengar
: 			   kaz Atash-e daroonam dood az kafan  bar-Ayad
: 
: 								"Hafez"
: Another 'dal' anybody?

daaram az zolfe siaahash gele chandaan ke mapors
ke chenaan zoo shode-am bi sar o saamaan ke mapors

kas be ommide vafaa tarke del o din makonaad
ke chenaanam man az in karde pashimaan ke mapors

etc...

'sin' bedahid doostan!

Navid.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil (G. Host)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian,soc.culture.german,rec.travel.air
Subject: Re: Need your help!
Date: 11 Apr 92 01:16:29 GMT
Reply-To: ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil (G. Host)
Organization: Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC


> Article <1992Apr10.140620.21044@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> From: mtaghavi@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Amir Taghavi)

> 
> 
> I am planning to travel to Hamburg/Germany within next month. Could anyone 
> recommend any inexpensive flight to me, or does anybody know any good and
> caring agent to help me out. 
> 
> Thanks in advance for any info.
> Amir Taghavi

There are some great TWA coupons you may have gotten if you are a
TWA member - buy 1 get 1 free or $50/100/200 off or upgrade to
business class.

They are fully transferable.

Unfortunately my next international trip will
be to Hong Kong and TWA doesn't fly to Hong Kong.

Do you have coupons on Delta or United or any airline
which goes to Hong Kong to trade?

-- 
Glenn Host - Senior Systems Analyst (ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil)
NRL Code 5800, 4555 Overlook Ave.; Washington, DC 20375   (202) 767-2046
12307 Tigers Eye Court ; Reston, VA 22091                 (703) 620-1141
From: javad@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov (Javad Boroumand;NSIUSO)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Terrorist Khomeini regime attacks an NLA Base
Date: 6 Apr 92 22:17:03 GMT
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center

hernlem@chess.ncsu.EDU (Brad Hernlem) writes:

>I also heard that "supporters" of the MKO took a hostage in New York for
>a while yesterday. These Mojahedin are doing a good job of demonstrating
>what kind of people they are. 
>

"A" hostage you are refering to was a member of regime's UN mission.  The
place was the regime's UN office.  The purpose of the takeover was to get
media covrage and bring public attention to the regime's air attack.  This
was not a "hostage" taking and there were no demands.  That kind of business
is the work of Khomeini regime just in case if you have forgotten already.

Best regards
-- Javad
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: mxahmad@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (Mehdi Ahmadi)
Subject: Question about Persian Word processors?
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 17:40:13 GMT




	SalAm bar dostan:

	I am looking for a word processor in Farsi. I know several exists.
	I have an IBM 486 with windows and 4 meg ram. I know there are several
	for IBM type computers. I have heard about Parsnegar and Vazhehnegar.
	I have not seen any one them. I like to know what else is there and
	which one is better. I also like to have a price list and where
	one can get them. I like a "LEGAL" copy and I am willing to pay for it.

	Thanks
 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: aref@Tehran.Stanford.EDU (Modda'iyeh har hAzer va Vakileh har ghAyeb)
Subject: MoahA'ereh as well :-) Re: "The Successor" by GholAm Hossein SAedi
Organization: VezArateh Farhango-Honar  
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 00:42:23 GMT

In article <saied.703295671@odin> saied@odin.unomaha.edu (Saied*) writes:
> <stuff deleted>
>closely affiliated with the National Democratic
>Front (NDF). The NDF is headed by Dr. Matin-Daftari
>(late Dr. Mossadeq' grandsond) and is a member of 
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>the National Council of Resistance of Iran.
>

Giram pedareh to bood fAzel
		az fazleh pedar to rA che hAsel ????

lAm bedeh.

:-)





Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: mack@isl.Stanford.EDU (mack)
Subject: Re: Electronic MoshA'aereh (why not :-)?)
Keywords: Poetry and more poetry
Organization: Stanford University
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 19:30:46 GMT

aref@Tehran.Stanford.EDU (Modda'iyeh har hAzer va Vakileh har ghAyeb) writes:
>fayegh@cs.ubc.ca (David Fayegh) writes:
>>
>>(dAl bedeh :-)) 
>>
>
>dasty beh jAmeh bAdeh-o dasty beh zolfeh yAr
>                        rasghsy chonin miyAneyeh meydAnam Arezoost
>
>t bedeh, teyeh do noghteh!

teer e mozhgAn e to az eynak e posht
                        zad be ghalb e akhavi, bandeh ro kosht

            :-)

t bedeh, teyeh do noghteh!

    --mack
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: arash@sunee.waterloo.edu (Arash Jahangir)
Subject: Re: Reply to  Bahaies  gang
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 22:12:19 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.193027.15780@athena.mit.edu> nsohrabi@athena.mit.edu (Naghmeh Sohrabi) writes:
>
>
>In response to Shahrokh's statement on the reasons behind Seeghe I'd like to say
>that the reasons given are not always applicable.  There are women who seeghe be
>cause
>they like to have sex, but society doesn't accept a "sexually driven women", sothey seeghe.  If interested, take a look at Shahla Haeri's book titled "The lawof desire" (i think.)
>
This doesn't really make sense to me.  I don't know if myself and other men and
women I know make a good enough sample to draw upon, but all the people I know
of want sex only on impulse (a few want it all the time but never mind them :-)
So if I were a woman, and it so happened that I wanted sex at a particular time
then to me it wouldn't make sense to go through all the hassels of becoming
somebody's Seeghe.  Not only that would take away all the spontanity out of sex
and nevermind that there are a lot of things that can go wrong in practice, 
being someone's Seeghe means that once the duration is over, I wouldn't be
able to have sex for another 3 months and 10 days :-((.  It also doesn't make
sense to say that Seeghe would be used as a 2 minute ritual on the verge of
action just to make it legal, because if there is to be that much chemistry
between a couple, then they wouldn't want it as a one night stand; they'd want
to give it all they've got to see if they can make it work.  Considering that
Seeghe is allowed only to women who have been married before, both sides
presumably have enough maturity to know if they are right for each other.
This is not to say that what you are postulating never happens, rather that 
the combination of above reasons, the up bringing of people, and the general
social structure would seldom allow for it.

Please let me know if that book is published in English, and if so who the
publisher is.  I am interested to read it.

>anyway, just to make a controversial statement, don't you think if seeghe is
>"legalized" temporary prostitution, most (I said most) marriages are "legalized"
>permanent prostitution also? (just a thought...)

Depends on what you call prostitution.  In my humble openion, no.  The mere
fact that it is permanent means that it is at the worst an economical partner-
ship, and at the best an apreciation for one another and the desire to fulfill
each other's life.

Arash

Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian