From: jj@alice.att.com (jj, curmudgeon and clueless old white boy)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.asian.american
Subject: Re: On Hating Whites was Re: * Michael Crichton
Date: 22 Jan 93 20:33:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: alice.24689
Reply-To: jj@alice.UUCP (jj, curmudgeon and clueless old white boy)
Organization: NJ State Home for Bewildered Terminals

In article <8fLq6vG00iV3I91Z9B@andrew.cmu.edu> ra01+@andrew.cmu.edu (Rikiya Asano) writes:
>Isn't this the best! This individual doesn't know the hoorible treatment
>that I've been taken by those humans whom were white.

And that's moot to the rhetorical issue here, although I don't wish
abuse on any human being.

>I don't hate white people.

Your written word makes it seem entirely otherwise.

>I go to a school full of them.
Unrelated again to the issue at point.

>It is insulting to me that you
>are assuming that my true experiences are "Misinformation about white
>people based on false, vindictive and vicious stereotyping"!
Of course, I'm doing so such thing, and I'll thank you to stop
claiming otherwise.  I AM disputing your generalized attacks on
white people, you characterizations of white people, and the
viptuperitive attitude you show toward white people.  I am
also disputing your attacks on white people as prejudiced
and so on, when you show the same prejudices and engage in the
same sort of racial stereotyping you accues white people of.

Such behavior is contradictory, and seems to claim that you
are somehow above white people, i.e. it's OK for you to generalize
and show prejudice, but it's not ok for them to do that.
(I think it's not OK period, just to keep you from concocting another straw man.)
>This is a
>funny ascertion. but, it is another attempt to angelical-ized those
>people who are extremely bigotted and who are aslo white.

It's nothing of the sort, and you well know it.  You have
come out now and directly accused me of supporting white 
supremicists.  You seem to think you've proven that, ignoring
the obvious fact that I have not only NOT supported racial
supremicy of ANY type.  Your accusations are entirely false,
and constitute nothing but an attack on a white person whose
words and ideas you don't like and can find no justified
reason to dislike.

>I've seen many attempts but this takes the cake!
I hereby demand that you retract your abject slander in its
entirety, forthwith, and with all due haste.  You have misrepresented
each and every fact of my several postings on this subject, you
have falsely stated that they say exactly opposite what they
clearly and transparently say, and you have used this to attack
my reputation, race, and rhetoric.  There is no possible justification
for your insensate attack.  I expect a prompt apology and retraction,
unless you can produce evidence to other effect.  As I well
know that no such evidence exists now, or has ever existed,
I await your retraction.

>Alot of intelligent words! But, no substances!

How typical of your postings. You make completely insubstantial
attacks on another's words and reputation, and then accuse them
of what you do yourself.  Again you show your belief in 
superiority by doing what you decry in others.

>Here is substance and truth:
Where? I 'm looking.

>The Great Caucasian European Blunder Pt. One
Why, I dare say that you're now using netnews to promulgate
direct and obvious racial epithets.

I demand that you cease.
-- 
Copyright alice!jj 1993, all rights reserved, except transmission by USENET and like facilities granted. Said permission is granted only for complete copies that include this notice. Use on pay-for-read services specifically disallowed.
---------
Member HASA - Athiest Scum Division
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice" - AuH2O for President
Newsgroups: soc.culture.asian.american,talk.politics.misc