HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gaspar@stepsun.army.mil (Al Gaspar)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Which pcnfsd?
Date: 25 Jan 93 13:19:10 GMT
Reply-To: gaspar@st-louis-emh2.army.mil
Organization: The Internet


    I have users using PC-NFS 4.0 and both 2.05 and 2.1 versions of FTP
Software's PC/TCP with idrive.  I have pcnfsd's from PC-NFS 4.0, both
versions of PC/TCP, and the latest pcnfsd (from Geoff Arnold) off of
bcm.tmc.edu.  I am a little concerned as to which one to use.  Is there
any reason that I should not just use the latest version off of bcm.tmc.edu?

    As an aside, I did find a nasty bug in idrive right before 2.1 came out
(I reported it; I don't know whether it was fixed).  If your UNIX passwd file
entry took the default /bin/sh by leaving the last field blank, idrive wouldn't
mount your nfs drives for you.  It worked fine if you explicitly defined /bin/sh
(or any other shell); PC-NFS did not have this problem.  If I remember right
this was with the Sun distributed pcnfsd of which the one on bcm.tmc.edu is a
later version...  Anyway I would appreciate all comments, suggestions, etc...

Thanks--

Al

-- 
Al Gaspar       <gaspar@st-louis-emh2.army.mil>
USAMC SIMA, ATTN:  AMXSI-TTC, 1222 Spruce St., St. Louis, MO  63103-2834
COMMERCIAL:  (314) 331-4354  AUTOVON:  555-4354
relay1.uu.net!st-louis-emh2.army.mil!gaspar
From: hardiman@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul V Hardiman)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: KA9Q RIP problem solved
Date: 27 Jan 1993 23:01:39 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: hardiman@csd4.csd.uwm.edu


Many thanks to heisen@numerik.uni-duesseldorf.de (Henner Eisen) for the
information given in a recent posting to this group.  When I issued the
RIP START command, ka9q immediately started processing incoming RIP
messages.

Note that I did not need to enter any RIP ACCEPT ... commands.
From: GSHERAR@UMINN1.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: NCSA Telnet 2.3+ docs
Date: 26 Jan 93 21:16:10 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota - Computer & Information Services

Is the documentation for PC Telnet 2.3.05 available in a word-processing
format, preferrably WP 5.1, alternatively Postscript. The ASCII version
of the docs are a joke -- randomly aligned and full of garbage characters.

I thought I saw a Postscript version once but I can't recall where.

If you wish to e-mail a reply, please do so to:
gsherar@sarthe.cme.umn.edu

Thank you.
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: bbesler@ouchem.chem.oakland.edu (Brent H. Besler)
Subject: Need Packet driver for Micom-Interlan NP600A card
Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 05:13:01 GMT

I have 5 Micom-Interlan NP600A ethernet boards.  I only have software
for using them under AT&T Unix 386.  I would like to run the PC's on
DOS/Windows, but need a packet driver for the cards.  I have extensively
searched the usual FTP sites for it and also on interlan.com.  Need
help!
From: rhughes@ucsd.edu (Richard J. Hughes)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Trumpet, Nupop and Gopher mouse desensitisation.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:59:59 GMT
Organization: ucsd.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sombsb224.ucsd.edu
Keywords: mouse

I find that when I use the "shell to DOS function" in any of Trumpet, Nupop 
or Gopher and return to the program in question, the mouse cursor is slowed 
w-a-y down.  I'm using the latest mouse driver, mouse.com that came with 
Windows 3.1, version 8.x.

What's going on?  Am I the only one experiencing this phenomenon?

Richard J. Hughes
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: kjetilo@bilbo.uio.no (Kjetil Otter Olsen)
Subject: Appletalk and NCSA
Organization: University of Oslo
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 01:10:17 GMT



Does anyone get Apple's AppleTalk/PC card and NCSA Telnet (or other
PD TCP/IP variants like KA9Q or MS-Kermit) to work together ??

Any clues or examples are VERY velcome!

Thanks in advance.

Answers in mail, please.

Best regards,

   Kjetil

-----
Kjetil Otter Olsen                            kjetilo@usit.uio.no
Senior Communication Engineer,     M.Sc.,   C.Sc.
Center for Information Technology Services (USIT), University of Oslo
-----
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: steveh@devildog.att.com (Steve Hendershott)
Subject: FTP TCP/IP 2.11 Keyboard Re-Map
Organization: AT&T IMS - Piscataway, NJ (USA)
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:16:16 GMT

I have a question regarding keyboard re-mapping using the Windows telnet
program from FTP. I have a call into FTP support, but it takes so long
sometimes to get someone there, I though this might be faster if someone
knows the answer.

I would like to map my PC's PF1 key to send the string <Ctrl U>1. I believe
<Ctrl U> is a NAK and that doesn't show up in the list of possibilities.
The re-mapping window does not allow entering the hexadecimal either (or
at least as far as I can tell). 

What can one do? Edit the map file manually? Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Steve Hendershott
steveh@devildog.att.com
-- 

Stephen W. Hendershott
steveh@devildog.att.com
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: amehta@minerva.cis.yale.edu (Anand R. Mehta)
Subject: help with ka9q
Followup-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Organization: Academic Computing Services
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 03:57:35 GMT

Hello all.

I am currently trying to set up a PPP link between a NeXT and a PC, which
is on the campus ethernet.  I have the NeXT PPP implimentation working, but
cannot get the PC up.  I believe that the packet driver is installed
correctly (NCSA telnet will use it), and that the problem is one of
configuring the PC routing tables, etc.  I have not even tried ka9q with
PPP, as I cannot get it to work over ether.

Could someone who has configured ka9q to work (even without ppp) please
email me a copy of their *.net file so that I can have a look at what is
going on?  Also, any tips on where to find more documentation would be
greatly appreciated.

What I would like to have eventually is this:

============PC============ether
             |
             |
             ppp
             |
            NeXT

with ka9q routing packets between the NeXT and the rest of the world.

Any help that you can give me would be greatly appreciated.

-Anand 
Academic Computing Services
Yale University
(203) 436-1437
From: rich9256@mary.cs.fredonia.edu (Devin    Richards)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: TCP/IP to Ada interface????
Date: 28 Jan 93 18:56:22 GMT
Organization: Math / CS, State Univ. of N. Y. College at Fredonia
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3


I am looking for packages or any type of software that would allow me to
interface TCP/IP with Ada.  Any help would be appreciated.
Please send me vendors/names/anything else!

Thanks in advance.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-
Devin Richards					SUNY College at Fredonia

          INTERNET: rich9256@mary.cs.fredonia.edu
          UUCP:  {ucbvax,rutgers}!sunybcs!mary!rich9256

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   It rolls down stairs alone or in pairs it runs over your neighbor's dog.
   It fits on your back it's great for a snack it's Log Log Log. 
   It's Log Log it's big it's heavy it's wood.
   It's Log Log it's better then bad it good!
   New Log from Blammo.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: daniel@ing.puc.cl (Daniel Hirschberg)
Subject: Re: BOOTP, pkt drivers, and ethernet board type
Organization: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 13:19:28 GMT

After reading your postings I decided you might be interest in this stuff,


I've been working around the eprom solution for a while...
I already have written the packetdriver and a parameter string into eprom...
I'm currently developing the routine needed to call that pktdrv with those parameters...by this time I have a "55 byte card sensitive pktdriver"


any comments, 
--
       _______________________
      /\                      \
      \_| Daniel Hirschberg J. |
        | daniel@ing.puc.cl    |
        | Santiago, CHILE.     |
        |   ___________________|_
  	 \_/____________________/
 
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: george@henson.cc.wwu.edu (George Hartnell)
Subject: Ping.exe with NCSA
Summary: Where's the docs for ping.exe?
Keywords: ping ncsa ping.exe
Organization: Western Washington University
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:05:42 GMT

Well, a while back the Hapless Technician obtained a file called 'ping.exe'
from cac.washington.edu. It lived in a directory called /ncsa/pc. The some-
times foolish Technician assumed that ping.exe has some relation to the
well-known NCSA package, because of dircetory association. Buutt nooooo....!
NCSA responded with a "it's not ours". (NO fault to them, NCSA is a good
product for both intel and mac platforms.) Nowhere in archie-land is there
any reference to ping.doc, (.txt .src), nor has there been any doc anywhere
that ping.exe lived, that the Hapless One could find.
As one might muse, ping.exe isn't working with NCSA hardware=packet configs
on the SMC8013EWC NIC. It squeals annoyingly about drivers it can't find.
WD8003.com doesn't cut, either. (By the way, the Hapless Technician would
also view with great kindness anyone who has full doc sites for *that*.)
Soooooo, where's the right stuff, eh?

Best regards, G.

-- 
*****************************************************************************
*           Who *cares* about opinions, I deny ever having one.             *
************* George Hartnell, Western Washington University ****************
george@henson.cc.wwu.edu, Computer Center, Bellingham, Wa. 98225 206-650-2975
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: GJAMES@HUSKY1.STMARYS.CA (GJames)
Subject: Re: PC EUDORA
Organization: Saint Mary's University
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 14:39:14 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.124234.8059@emr1.emr.ca> Tony Euser <euser@emr.ca> writes:

>A beta (or prerelease) version of Eudora for windows is available from
>qualcomm.com.  However, it requires FTP Software's TCP/IP stack version
>2.1

>escaffre@cix.cict.fr (Christian Escaffre)


Could you the me the numerical Internet adress for this site
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: paul@ace.acadiau.ca (Paul Steele)
Subject: CUTCP gives IP Fragmentation error using SLIP
Organization: Acadia University
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 12:37:53 GMT

I have set up a port on our Annex terminal server to support SLIP.  In order 
to make the connection, I am using the SLIP8250 packet driver and CUTCP's
version of Telnet (TN3270).  I can make the initial connection without 
problems.  I get the login prompt and can log in without problems.  But as 
soon as I give a command that does a lot of screen output, the session 
basically freezes up.  I can still enter commands, but I don't get any 
output back.  When I check the messages window I usually find a error message
about receiving a fragmented packet and that IP fragmentation is not 
supported.  Sometimes there is also a TCP checksum error.

Is there some way to configure slip and/or cutcp to avoid this error?  Any 
suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

___
Paul Steele, Network Services Manager              902-542-2201x660
Acadia University, Computer Centre            FAX: 902-542-4364
Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada, B0P 1X0  Internet: Paul.Steele@acadiau.ca
From: toyofuku@tahiti.lib.uci.edu (Anthony D. Toyofuku)
Subject: A question on TCP/IP with Kermit
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 29 Jan 93 01:52:53 GMT

Hi,

Yesterday, to my delight I stumbled on the fact that Kermit now supports 
TCP/IP.  And now that I've discovered it, I've got a few questions.  I'm 
using an old PS/2 8086, connect by Ethernet to the campus backbone, then
going out to the Internet.  By way of introduction, I would consider
myself a Telnet user, not a hacker of Telnet.

1.  When scrolling through many pages of text, is Kermit slower than
    NCSA Telnet or is it just my imagination?  If it is slower, is
    there any way I can speed it up?

2.  The reason I find Telnet appealing is because of the ability to
    write script files.  While I don't know of this ability in Telnet,
    maybe it is possible.  Is it possible to write auto-login scripts
    in NCSA Telnet? How do you go about doing it?  Is there any 
    documentation anywhere?

Tony

Anthony Toyofuku
Main Library
University of California,
Irvine
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: Tony Euser <euser@emr.ca>
Subject: Re: PC EUDORA
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A78A9BF3B3012C0B@maceuser.mets.emr.ca>
X-Xxdate: Tue, 26 Jan 93 12:42:43 GMT
Organization: Energy, Mines and Resources Canada
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d13
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 12:42:34 GMT

A beta (or prerelease) version of Eudora for windows is available from
qualcomm.com.  However, it requires FTP Software's TCP/IP stack version
2.1

escaffre@cix.cict.fr (Christian Escaffre)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: alen@crash.cts.com (Alen Shapiro)
Subject: HELP...OS2 TCP-IP loads into DOS too, I need the DOS memory!!
Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA
Date: 22 Jan 93 01:40:04 GMT
Summary: When IBM TCP-IP loads into OS/2 1.33 it uses DOS memory also!!
Keywords: PS/2 OS/2 DOS TCP-IP Lan Adaptor memory driver

Hi netters, I have OS/2 1.33 (extended) with IBMs TCP-IP drivers. They
load (using config.sys) into both OS/2 and DOS. I only need to run
telnet sessions on the OS/2 side, I need the 180k used by these drivers
on the DOS side when the DOS window is activated.

Is there a mechanism (hack or not) to unload these drivers from DOS
and still allow OS/2 TCP-IP to survive?

Are there public domain TCP-IPs that run under OS/2 that take less than
80kb on the DOS side or do not load there at all?

Just in case it is important...The hardware on which this is running
uses IBM's LAN Adaptor card to route the TCP-IP packets.

This is quite urgent so please try to help...Thanks in advance.

please email to
	alen@crash.cts.com
and I'll summarise for the net.
From: boris@netman-gate.netmanage.com (Boris Yanovsky)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: RE: .uk
Date: 25 Jan 93 17:29:44 GMT
Reply-To: boris@netmanage.com
Distribution: world
Organization: The Internet

>I'm pleased that the Windows Sockets thing is starting to pick up, but is 
>anyone actually in the process of writing a freely available winsock.dll ? 
>Maybe Microsoft are going to start distributing one with Windows itself. 
>Surely this would save confusion? Although, of course, vendors should be able 
>to create thier own also, as they may be better tuned. 

The reason for doing Windows Sockets was to provide a single interface for 
different vendors transports (originaly each vendor had his own interface).
To provide a single DLL wich can access each individual vendors transport is a 
large job which now becomes unnecessary.  When you purchase a TCP/IP product it 
should have a Windows Socket interface built in, so even though you are geting a 
winsock.dll as a separate file it is part of the product.  

I guess what I am trying to stress that winsock.dll is NOT a separate product. 
The products is the TCP/IP (hopefully in the future any transport) stack with 
Windows Sockets API.


***************************************
Boris Yanovsky
20823 Stevens Creek Blvd., Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
phone: (408)973-7171
fax:   (408)257-6405
boris@netmanage.com
***************************************
From: felicia@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Chu Peng Cheong)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: PC <---> Unix Communication
Date: 26 Jan 1993 00:31:10 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: felicia@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

I am beginning to evaluate software lib to allow remote procedure calls/
TCP programming between PC and Unix boxes.  The PCs willbe running database
front-end applications in Windows, and communicating with daemons running
on Unix host.

I only know of two packages so far:
 1-   FTP's TC/TCP Development Kit
 2-   Distinct TCP/IP for Windows

I am looking for comments/suggestions that you may have on what is a 
better package and from whom it maybe.

Also, since I already have PC-NFS from sun, would I have to buy
FTP's or Distinct's other softwares to replace it? 

Which one will be more flexible, especially in a database application?
(ie. Informix, Oracle and Sybase)?

Thanks inadvance,
pls reply to: felicia@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

--------------------------------------------------------------------+  
- Felicia C Cheong
- P.O.Box 1512                  email: felicia@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
- Milwaukee, WI 53201                         
- Fax: (414) 797-6729          
- Voice:     797-6787/332-7657
--------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: mje@posix.co.za
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: PCROUTE as a cable converter
Date: 23 Jan 93 18:08:12 GMT
Organization: Mark's Machine (Working for Olivetti Africa)

>>Just wanted to know if I could use PCRoute to convert from say, thin ethernet
>>to 10baseT by using the router?

>Why not simply use the PCBridge code ?  We use it to convert from thickwire
>to thin.  The only problem now is that the only supported card that is
>still available is the 3c507 - which is a bit pricy.

I agree with using PC-Bridge... but I use Cheapo WD cards - and they work
just fine.  I, in fact, have UTP on one side and thin on the other.

-- 
  .  .     ___. .__      Olivetti Systems & Networks, Unix Support - Africa
 /| /|       / /__       UUCP: uunet!olsa99!mje (Mark J. Elkins)
/ |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS  mje@olive.co.za (Postmaster) Tel: +27 11 456 3125
From: phart@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick S Hart)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: ?? DOS PC connection to Apple print device ??
Date: 26 Jan 93 14:45:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: magnus.1993Jan26.144524.974
Organization: The Ohio State University

In article <2529@blue.cis.pitt.edu> daryl+@pitt.edu (Daryl P Sawders) writes:
>
>I'm confused...
>
>A friend of mine has a Mac connected to our ethernet, he can use the Chooser
>select a printer ( an HP III with a Postscript cartridge) on the net and
>print with no problem...
>
>What's the DOS PC equivalent of the Chooser ??
>
>If I know the ethernet Id of a device on a Net how do I route "stuff" to it??
>
>When is a PC going to be as easy to net as a MAC ?-}
>

Probally never - at least not free as the net stuff for the Mac is.  You can 
put the blame on Gates and fat-cat managers for this boon-doggle.

As far as DOS PC eq. to chosser there is a product called Timbuktu ver 1.0 for
windows which also comes with Apple-Talk protocol for the IBM.  The product is
very reasonable priced @ $699.00 for a ten pack.  It is ODI compliant so you 
can run Novell as well as TCP/IP.

P.
From: barilj@ere.umontreal.ca (Baril Jude)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: RE: PC-Xview and TCP/IP help ???
Date: 28 Jan 93 15:19:08 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Internet

===> Extrait du message de Joseph ' Web ' Stayman
> 	Secondly, once I've set up the machine and have logged on to 
> Rensselaer's remote system, I can only bring up about three things (xterms,
> clocks, etc) before the machine gives me the command that the display
> cannot be opened.  Does this sound like a memory problem?  I have 4 megs
> and PC-Xview claims to have access to 15 megs of virtual memory...
> 
  Look in the PC-Xview manual for your TCP/IP implementation, they give
  for most of them the recepe to increase the maximum number of session
  allowed (at least for B&W & PC/TCP).
__

Jude Baril                  "Vroum vroum vroum __o               Service Reseau
barilj@ERE.UMontreal.CA     sur mon p'tit    _ \<,_      Services Informatiques
(514)343-6111 ext: 5268     bicycle ..."    (_)/ (_)     Universite de Montreal
                         (a l'entrainement) O-O---O

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: adhir@wam.umd.edu (Al Dhir)
Subject: Packet driver for 3Com's 3+share v1.2.1
Keywords: PCTCP Gateway
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:48:01 GMT

Hello all, I wonder if anyone can tell me where I might find a packet
driver interface for 3com's 3+share v1.2.1.  I know its old, but that's
what my client is running.

Thanks

-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Al Dhir                      			   Technical Consulting Staff
 Internet: adhir@cygnus.umd.edu	  	 University of Maryland, College Park
 Bitnet:   adhir%cygnus.umd.edu@Interbit      (301) 405-1500 * (301) 405-3014
From: ashok@biochemistry.cwru.edu (Ashok Aiyar)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: CUTCP gives IP Fragmentation error using SLIP
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:09:26
Organization: CWRU School of Medicine
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: axa12-slip.dialin.cwru.edu

In article <paul.18.727706272@ace.acadiau.ca> paul@ace.acadiau.ca (Paul Steele) writes:

>I have set up a port on our Annex terminal server to support SLIP.  In order 
>to make the connection, I am using the SLIP8250 packet driver and CUTCP's
>version of Telnet (TN3270).  I can make the initial connection without 
>problems.  I get the login prompt and can log in without problems.  But as 
>soon as I give a command that does a lot of screen output, the session 
>basically freezes up.  I can still enter commands, but I don't get any 
>output back.  When I check the messages window I usually find a error message
>about receiving a fragmented packet and that IP fragmentation is not 
>supported.  Sometimes there is also a TCP checksum error.

>Is there some way to configure slip and/or cutcp to avoid this error?  Any 
>suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Try using small MTU and MSS in CONFIG.TEL -- I suggest an MTU of 576 bytes and 
the corresponding MSS of 536 bytes.  Load SLIP8250 with 5000 byte buffers, and 
enable hardware handshaking.  Philip Burns of NWU wrote a version of SLIP8250 
that did better hardware handshaking than the distribution version 10 Crynwr 
release.

Ashok  
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Ashok Aiyar 
                      Department of Biochemistry
                       CWRU School of Medicine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: jbvb@FTP.COM ("James B. Van Bokkelen")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: PhoneNET PC and TCP/IP????
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:46:58 GMT
Reply-To: jbvb@ftp.com
Distribution: world
Organization: The Internet


    >A friend of mine called them last week and they told him PhoneNet
    >PC 3.0 was compatible with PC/TCP. I don't know how it's done, but I
    >suspect that they make use of the OKIPKT driver...
    
    There is also a version of PC/TCP which uses ODI to talk to the network
    card, thus eliminating the need for ODIPKT to go between.

Sorry, but this doesn't exist as of the moment.  You can use ETHDRV or
TOKDRV on the ODIPKT we distribute (which will have a bug fix for the
3C509 problem in v2.2, due out this quarter).

James B. VanBokkelen		2 High St., North Andover, MA  01845
FTP Software Inc.		voice: (508) 685-4000  fax: (508) 794-4488