HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: What is in the Technical Reference Library?
Date: 9 Oct 92 19:01:37 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Oct8.172122.23500@seas.gwu.edu> lai@seas.gwu.edu (William Y. Lai) writes:
>I've heard that IBM has a publication called OS/2 Techincal Reference
>Library, which is available in paper form for $295 and in electronic
>form via the DAP CD-ROM.  Does anyone know what sort of techincal info
>does it contain?  And can someone tell me in what format is the Tech Ref
>stored on the CD-ROM?

It contains 17 volumes of stuff on how to program OS/2.  Included is a
complete CP reference, a complete PM reference, a complete SOM
reference, a complete REXX reference, CodePage templates, and other
books on programming OS/2. 

Many of these are included (in electronic form) in the OS/2 2.0
toolkit in the form of information (*.INF) files that you can use with
the VIEW.EXE utility.

I don't know how the books are stored on the CD-ROM.  I should hope
they're in .INF formation, but I don't know.
-- 
David Charlap         |"there aren't 50,000 things for which it's worth writing
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu| software; and the computer industry doesn't have enough
----------------------+ programmers to create that much good software.
Therefore, most of it must be worthless" -- Boris Beizer "The Frozen Keyboard"
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: goyal@utdallas.edu (Mohit K. Goyal)
Subject: Re: Information about video drivers for OS/2 2.0...
Organization: Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 00:01:16 GMT

In article <1992Oct15.112917.856@calmasd.prime.com> kjb@calmasd.prime.com (Ken Brucker) writes:
>>>Tseng ET4000 drivers will be in the Service Pack, they will be 32-bit,
>>>256 colour drivers for VGA, SVGA, and 1024X768.
>>>
>
>Are these going to support seamless mode???
>
I think it is safe to say and video driver written by IBM will support
"seamless" mode.


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.apps
From: ben@val.com (Ben Thornton)
Subject: Re: Mathcad under winos2
Organization: Video Associates Labs - Austin, TX
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 16:33:59 GMT

In article <1992Oct10.221850.17419@newstand.syr.edu> cwebster@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Chris Webster) writes:
>I just purchased a copy of mathcad.  A week or two, someone posted an 
>article about a particular trick to get it to run under winos2; I believe
>it had something to do with setting something to -1.  Anyway, the
>article has scrolled, so could someone please send me a copy of it?
>Thanks.
>

Actually, the solution that I found for this is to increase the amount of DPMI
and/or XMS memory for the winos2 session (I'm not there, so I can't remember which.)

  -- ben

-- 
Ben Thornton                packet:  wd5hls@wd5hls.ampr.org
Video Associates Labs     Internet:  ben@val.com
Austin, TX                    uucp:  ...!cs.utexas.edu!val!ben
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: ssinglet@cassandra.cair.du.edu (LaserJock)
Subject: rc binary for emx-0.8e --  where can I find it?
Organization: University of Denver, Denver, Colorado
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 22:30:32 GMT

I have just installed the emx-0.8e package for os/2.  The docs say to
use "rc -r" to generate resource files, but rc is apparently not part
of the emx archive files.  I looked through hobbes, but don't seem to
be able to find the rc executables.  Could someone enlighten me?  I'm
very new at this, so please use lots of detail....
Thank you for your help.....

Steve
ssinglet@du.edu

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sci240s@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Wey Jing HO)
Subject: Re: Thoughts during my forced OS/2 sabbatical
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 03:15:03 GMT

In <CB.92Oct12135737@tamarack13.timbuk> cb@tamarack13.timbuk (Chris Brewster) writes:


>After a long series of crashes and lost work, and many failed attempts
>to get OS/2 to work, I'm back using DOS and Central Point PC Shell until
>either the CSD or 2.01.  And now I'm feeling a bit nostalgic about some
>features I formerly took for granted.  For example, PC Shell allows me
>to view files of all kinds without needing to open the programs that use
>those file types.  It allows me to list many more files on screen at
>once than either of OS/2's listing styles (icon and details).  It
>arranges these names in the most efficient way within the available
>space, rather than OS/2's way of arranging the icons without taking
>account of the shape and size of the window that contains the directory.

This is available using list75.exe (the popular list utility that I used a lot
under DOS). Ftp from ftp-os2.nmsu.edu

-- 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Wey Jing Ho    Tel: 61-3-573-2567   E-mail : sci240s@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au<
>Physics Dept., Monash University ( Caulfield Campus ), Melbourne, AUSTRALIA<
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From: holcomb@ctron.com (Edgar Holcomb)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: why OS/2 better than Windows?
Date: 16 Oct 92 15:13:57 GMT
Distribution: comp.windows.ms comp.os.msdos.misc comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Organization: Cabletron Systems Inc.


You know, I read so much about the operating system (OS/2) and the
operating environment (Windows), but somehow, I still can't clearly
articulate the disadvantages Windows suffers by running on top of DOS.
I know the segmented memory of DOS has a lot to do with it.  But, what
exactly are the problems with this scheme?  What makes DOS so weak in
terms of multi-tasking and the other things to which Windows aspires?

Conversly, how does OS/2 handle multi-tasking that's different from
Windows (besides the pre-emptive/cooperative aspects)?

I'm pretty well sold on the 32-bit OS/2/UNIX/Windows NT technology, but
how do I explain why to someone who's not convinced?

Thanks!

-Edgar in...
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: kroe@cs.sunysb.edu (KiYun Roe)
Subject: WIN-OS/2<->OS/2 cut and paste doesn't work in beta
Organization: Dept of Computer Science, State U of NY at Stony Brook
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 13:55:15 GMT

Hello all,

I'd like to know if this is a known problem, or if I'm just doing
something wrong.  Since I've installed the GRE-Win 3.1 beta I have been
unable to cut and paste between WIN-OS/2 and OS/2 sessions.  I have had
no success with either 3.0 or 3.1 sessions.  I have made sure
WIN_CLIPBOARD=ON for the individual sessions as well as in WIN-OS/2
Setup.  I have also made the clipboard public on the Data Exchange page
of WIN-OS/2 Setup.  I don't know what else I can do to affect cut and
paste between sessions.

Thank you for any information you can provide.

--
KiYun Roe					kroe@sbcs.sunysb.edu
Department of Computer Science
SUNY at Stony Brook
Stony Brook, NY  11794-4400			(516) 632-7675
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: goyal@utdallas.edu (Mohit K. Goyal)
Subject: OS/2 2.0 drivers *ARE* shipping with new ATI cards!!
Organization: Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 17:08:27 GMT

I just got off the phone with ATI customer service (4167560711) and
the guy I spoke with said that the ATI Graphics Ultra Plus has drivers
for OS/2 2.0 included with it.

These are 16-bit drivers, *but* he told me that they have a copy of the
beta 32-bit graphics engine in house and the drivers do work with it.

I could not get an answer on whether or not ATI would release 32-bit
drivers for the 32-bit GRE. (the only advantage for this would be speed)

Anyways, I did not ask about the Ultra Pro, but the story should be the
same for it.

Someone else has told me that video drivers from Cirrus, Video-7, ATI,
and Paradise, along with 8514/a drivers all will be coming out in 1992.
He said that they are being made by IBM.  The guy who told me this is
Albert Shan.  The drivers will be 32-bit drivers.

That's all for now...

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jmsmith@eos.ncsu.edu (JEFFREY MARTIN SMITH)
Subject: Re: DON'T BUY OS/2 -- IBM IS HORRIBLE
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 14:50:12 GMT

In article <67445@cup.portal.com>, Tazzie@cup.portal.com (Jon S Novak) writes:
|> I just got off the phone with IBM Tech Support.  If I want to be able
|> to use my CD-ROM drive (Creative Labs SBPRO MM Upgrade Kit) then I 
|> have to either (A) buy an IBM cd-rom drive or (B) buy their 
|> 'Multimedia Package' software for $500 bucks.  Are they out of their
|> minds?   I just spent $100 for a program that was 'compatable with
|> windows and dos programs' but in order for ME to be compatable, I must
|> spend $500 more?  With customer support like that, it's no wonder that
|> their stocks are falling.  My only suggestion is to keep away from IBM
|> and stick with good ole reliable Microsoft (Can't wait for Windows NT)
|> Furthermore, in their 'readme' file it tells you about problems with certain
|> functions of some programs, and their solution? 'Don't use those features' Nic

I have the same setup and you can access the drive if you set up a DOS VDM...
I called creative labs over the summer and they said they would be releasing
drivers soon, And if you mean MMPM/2 as the MUltimedia Package its only $125
direct from IBM.  I don't think thats the one they meant though the $500 dollar
one probably includes a CD-ROM drive.

And as for NT, They don't support the SBPro MM kit either.

TTFN,
Jeff 
-- 
Romana: "I thought you said we were coming here for May Week?"
Doctor: "I did, May Week's in June."
                                 --Shada and The Five Doctors--
Jeffrey Smith     -<KD4AYH>-       jmsmith@eos.ncsu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: cpbaltus@cs.vu.nl (Stefan Baltus)
Subject: Redbooks in Postscript format
Keywords: Redbooks
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 08:25:50 GMT

Does somebody have the redbooks available in Postscript format? I want to
print the books but i do not have the HD space at home to convert the 
.inf to postscript (i.e. printing them to a postscript printer). 


Could somebody help?

				Stefan.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science       Vrije Universiteit
				             Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Stefan Baltus.			    	    InterNet: cpbaltus@cs.vu.nl
From: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.x would loose its battle against Windows NT if...
Date: 12 Oct 92 11:33:12 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Originator: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au

Phil PRANNO (gumby@cs.mcgill.ca) wrote:
> 
> The WPS is CUA 91 compliant.

IBM don't think so. The Redbooks are full of pointers to programmers not to
do what IBM has done with the WPS. There are lists of exactly what is not
CUA compliant in there too. 

e.g. ALL windows are supposed to have a pull down menu bar across the top
(that's how I read it at least). The WPS menu box in the corner doesn't
qualify according to IBM.

-- 
Tom J Parry.
Your reality is a figment of my imagination.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: kitchin@avo.hp.com (Bruce Kitchin)
Subject: Re: GCC PM Programming docs
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara Division
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.3 PL6]
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 15:27:00 GMT

Timothy F. Sipples (sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu) wrote:
: 
: Actually, the information is now available on CD-ROM for $15.  See the
: FAQ List (Release 2.0f) for details.
: 
I've looked several times this morning for 2.0f of FAQ.  I can't find it
either in /pub/os2/all/faq or in /pub/os2/new.  Has it been posted yet?
Or is the revision still 2.0e?

Thanks
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jav2d@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Adams Vanvalkenburgh)
Subject: Re: Shutdown without a mouse
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 23:57:57 GMT

Use the cursor keys on the desktop to select an object.
The title line will be highlighted.  Press the space (?)
key so the highlight goes off (and no object on the 
desktop is highlighted at all).  This means that you
have selected the desktop itself.  Then press F8 (or
maybe F10) and that will bring up the menu for the
desktop.  From there you're ready to go (select shut down).


				Jason A. vanValkenburgh
				UVa '95?


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: dabl2@nlm.nih.gov (Don A.B. Lindbergh)
Subject: Re: Why XGA-2?
Organization: National Library of Medicine
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 15:08:14 GMT

In article <1992Oct14.032156.5017@nmt.edu> mystical@nmt.edu (Gurupartap Davis) writes:
>In article <92286.225410BJT105@psuvm.psu.edu> <BJT105@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>>planned for 1993.  Think of this as something like the way the 386
>>virtualizes the 8086 ...  this is an exciting and critical feature for
>>multitasking operating systems like OS/2 and NT, to multitask VGA
>>applications windowed and in the background!  I don't know how this will
>
>I was just wondering what good this background vga thing is.  If it's not 
>being displayed on the screen anyway, who cares what kind of resolution 
>it's got?
>
>Partap
>mystical@jupiter.nmt.edu

Good question.  I can't explain everything perfectly, but basically
when you have a session running in the background, using say, vga resolution,
and the 'regular, 16 color vga drivers' included with OS/2 running, that 
session will be suspended (irregardless of background processing settings)
as soon as you start another fullscreen (but not windowed) DOS session. So,
for a real world example, if I start up a Prodigy DOS fullscreen session,
(using scripts to autologon) and the Program Object is set to 'minimized'
behavior, the result will be the program is started and the logon script
begins to be executed, I am left at the desktop, because of the 'minimized'
setting.  This is all great.  NOW, if I were to open another fullscreen DOS
session, that Prodigy session (with Prodigy set to run in vga mode) will
suspend, ie the script will STOP executing.  A minor annoyance in this case,
I could just wait until the script has completed, but then, this is OS/2!
What if you wanted to generate fractals or something in the background?  etc.

I did not painstakingly cover every issue here, nor attempt to fully explain
everything, I'm sure someone else could do better, but that's the basic idea.

--Don Lindbergh
dabl2@lhc.nlm.nih.gov
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jedwards@ms.uky.edu (Jonathan Edwards)
Subject: Re: OS2 BETA - dos emulation not as good?
    <1992Oct09.121954.9528@stiatl.salestech.com> 
    <10OCT199212024138@venus.tamu.edu>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 12:18:08 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

lmp8913@venus.tamu.edu (PRESTON, LISA M) writes:

>In article <1992Oct09.121954.9528@stiatl.salestech.com>, iam@stiatl.salestech.com (Ian Mercado) writes...
>>Geez...why don't you do IBM and the rest of us OS/2 lovers a favor and
>>REPORT THE DAMN THING!!
>> 
>>Argh...
>> 
>>Ian


>	HOW???

>	We don't have Compuserve access, and our report that we E-mailed
>to their tech-support address was met with "we are not supporting 
>the Beta version" as their reply.

>	The  E-mail address of anyone at IBM interested in a bug report
>would be appreciated.

>lISA 

Post it here and I'll forward it to them...
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: gerry@pizzabox.dialogic.com (Gerry Lachac)
Subject: Re: What do you recommend for CompuServe?
Organization: Dialogic Corporation
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 15:15:40 GMT

In article <Bw2M8v.D31@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> giguere@csg.uwaterloo.ca (Eric Giguere) writes:
>I want to access the IBMOS2 conferences on CompuServe and I'd rather do
>it offline as much as possible.  What software packages do you recommend?
>OS/2 would be best, but I can live with DOS or Windows navigators...

If you like freeware, OZCIS under a DOS session works great for me.
From: jeff@claw.clearpoint.com (Jeffrey J. Griglack)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Biff
Date: 9 Oct 92 19:24:32 GMT
Reply-To: jeff@claw.clearpoint.com
Organization: Clearpoint Research, Hopkinton, MA


I have gotten WinBiff and set it up.  It seems to work okay, but I was
wondering if there is an OS2Biff, PMBiff, WPSBiff or whatever it would
be called.

Thanks,
--

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Jeff Griglack             |"To mess about with typewriters and latch keys    |
|jeff@claw.clearpoint.com  | and call it work!"                               |
|jeff@fang.clearpoint.com  |                          -- E.M. Forster         |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: 2 screens
Date: 15 Oct 92 20:17:16 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Oct15.170028.25116@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM> mrice@mozart.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM (Mark W. Rice) writes:
>
>I've heard you cannot use hercules.  Can the monochrome card have hercules
>logic (knowing that you won't use it)?

yes.  As long as you remain in 80x25 text mode, it's functionally
equivalent to an IBM MDA card.

>If not, where can you find a monochrome only card?  All the ones I know
>have hercules graphics.

Computer flea markets (there are many in the NY-NJ area) often sell
them for about $10.

-- 
David Charlap         |"there aren't 50,000 things for which it's worth writing
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu| software; and the computer industry doesn't have enough
----------------------+ programmers to create that much good software.
Therefore, most of it must be worthless" -- Boris Beizer "The Frozen Keyboard"
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: Wildcards do not work with GNU utils
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 12:57:24 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.052006.6004@nmt.edu>, mystical@nmt.edu (Gurupartap Davis) writes:
>>>>When I try to use any GNU utility putting an * as filename, it says
>>>>"'*' not found". The 4os2 shell that I use seems not to be able to
>>>>expand the wildcard characters before invoking the program. 
> 
> This is one [no wildcard-expansion] frusterating thing I've noticed 
> about UNZIP 5.0 as well.

To be precise, one cannot use wildcards for the archive name, but you can
use wildcards for the list of files to extract (or list, test,...); i.e.,
if myfile.zip contains usr/local/gumby, then
  unzip -l myf*
will not work, but
  unzip myfile *gumby
is ok.

You may be able to get satisfactory globbing using one of the following:
1. ms_sh, 1.64 from Kai Uwe Rommel in pub/os2/all/gnu/, or 2.00 from
   Stewartson on simtel20.army.mil in pd1:<msdos.sysutl> (?). 

2. Rommel has just posted an alpha of ksh. I do not know much about ksh. Look
   in pub/uploads/gnu+other/

3. Use a globber (from perl or less177; there are others). This will require
   that you write a cmd file or program.

The files mentioned above (other than ms_sh200) can be found at
ftp-os2.nmsu.edu.

--darrel hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Changing Printing options...
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 19:21:42 GMT

In article <1b7m4uINN7qi@gap.caltech.edu> Andrew Tong writes:
>Is there any way to change the way OS/2 handles DOS and Windows print  
>jobs?
>Apparently, OS/2 tries to print the job as the job is being printed by the  
>program.  I want OS/2 to hold the job until after the program has finished  
>outputting the whole thing, then dump it all to the printer in one big  
>lump.
>(What's happening is this: Whenever I print from Coreldraw or Pagemaker,  
>the printer will go for a couple of lines, and then wait for a long time.   
>With a deskjet, this is not desirable, as the printer "resets" its  
>printhead after moments of inactivity....)

Yes.  Go to your printer object, and click on it once with mouse
button two.  Select Open -> Settings.  Click on the Queue options tab.
Uncheck the "Print while spooling" option.  Close up (double click on
the upper left).

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST 2.0f is avail.
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [For the Internet, vote Clinton-GORE this year.]
From: adhir@cygnus.umd.edu (Alok Dhir)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Running BASICA crashes OS/2
Date: 7 Oct 92 05:29:47 GMT
Organization: /etc/organization

In article <1992Oct6.141724.23797@ornl.gov> rm3@ornl.gov (MCBROOM R C) writes:
>In article <1992Oct6.073055.26822@u.washington.edu> someday@milton.u.washington.edu (Scott Johnson) writes:
>>
>>Stupid Human Tricks #173:
>>-------------------------
>>After reading Tim's comment above about it being fixed in the 
>>Service Pack, and since I'm running the beta here, I thought I'd
>>just do a quick test to make sure it got fixed....
>>
>>Guess what folks...it's not fixed in the beta!  Don't try this at home!
>>
>There seem to be a lot of the patches that were out that are not in the
>system supplied with the beta.  I sure hope the extra 2 weeks work on
>the SPP and whatever passed since the beta system was frozen have put
>some of the bugs to rest.  Specifically of note are problems with the
>swapfile.  The virtual memory system is not making the space used by
>applications available for others when an application is closed.
>
>
>Robert McBroom internet: rm3@ornl.gov

Having read all these posts about the basic/basica crashing OS/2, I got
curious and tried it on my 486/50 eisa, running the beta.  It didn't crash
at all, it just said that the Dos session experienced a problem and killed
it for me...

-- 
 ============================================================================
 Al Dhir                      			   Technical Consulting Staff
 Internet: adhir@cygnus.umd.edu	  	 University of Maryland, College Park
 Bitnet:   adhir%cygnus.umd.edu@Interbit      (301) 405-1500 * (301) 405-3014
From: Tazzie@cup.portal.com (Jon S Novak)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: IBM is Horrible
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 00:33:18 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world

My point is this:   You spend $89 on a program, one which claims
                    compatability.   After having problems with
                    one particular incompatability, they tell you
                    that you have shell out over $500 ... THAT is
                    not right.  


Now for those who say 'well you just spoke to someone who didn't know'
IBM is supposed to be the industry leader.  They are supposed to have
all these high standards for their employees.  So if this person is just
an example, what can you say about the company in general?  Forget about them.
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 18:52:58 EDT
From: Joe Bruce <JAB156@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: OS/2 Compatibility Question

I'm going to be purchasing a new system soon, and had a few questions:

  1.  Will OS/2 work okay with an EISA system?

  2.  How about 32-bit IDE controllers?  I've seen mention (like in the README
      file) about SCSI compatibility, but I've seen nothing said either way
      about EISA IDE cards.

  3.  How about 32-bit video cards.  I'll probably go with the ATI Graphics
      Ultra, but if not, how would an EISA SVGA card (non-S3) work?

Thanks for any info. you can give me.  Please reply via email.  If anyone
would like the answers to these questions sent to him/her, again, email the
request to me.  Thanks in advance.

Joe
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc