HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 09:21:29 GMT

In article <1449@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>, libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
 
> 1) If George Bush was not suggesting that atheists are in some way
> inferior U.S. citizens, and perhaps should not be considered
> citizens at all, then WHAT WAS he saying?  What sort of code was he
> using?

Well at least you are asking questions, which allows us to show you your own
ignorance. "What was he saying" It appears to me that President Bush did not
know how he felt about Atheists. He clearly believes that the United States is
a religiously minded nation, lo and behold he is correct. He also firmly stated
that he was for the seperation of Church and State, believing that the majority
of Americans did as well, lo and behold they do. Hmm. If the majority of the
United States professes a belief in God, and yet there must exist a seperation
of this religion, well then, it seems to be a reasonable question to ask "what
then are atheists?" It is the sort of acedemic reasoning that plagues our
highest tribunal "When does life start..." etc. The President seems to have
remained very consistant with the rest of acedemic government in his
ponderings.

 
> Please either answer these questions or shutup and stop annoying
> people with your young-republican inanities.

I find it very strange that you use this. Now, to shift the burden of proof,
can you Billy Boy, without mindlessly insulting the President, intelligently
prove the substance of your arguement? To coin a Court phrase "the literary or
artistic merit to society" that your point may have. I ask you to consider it in
this remonstration: Bush has lost, so... what is your point? Anything that he
has said about miniscule details regarding his own convictions, in light of the
election, are now moot. You have made an interesting accousation, now can you
swallow your own pill? (I suspect you swallow quite well)


--The Phantom
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Aza stirs from catatonia
Summary: Or then again, maybe not.
Keywords: Just another college-boy potty mouth.
Date: 19 Nov 92 06:54:01 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

aephel01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>Man o man.  This is worse than last time.  I see some sort of ego
>boost going on with voting between lara and troll and all that's
>here is rob tearing mr. roger's kid a new asshole.  

Rob, the meek little music librarian?  Rob, who can barely tear his
way out of bed in the morning to face another day of his meaningless
existence, Rob?  With your return, you're the only new asshole around
here, Aza.

>Who is this little shit?  

And now Aza, the third stooge, joins his pals Troll, Rob, and his dog
Leah in their gaggle of confusion screeching: "Who is this guy?  Who 
is this guy?"  Join the huddle, Aza.  There's safety in numbers. 

>Andy, you flame with the ability of a mosquitto fart. Unlit.

Yeah, well everybody is a critic.  What's a "mosquitto"? 

>Go on back to taking semen samples from bulls oraly.
                                              ^^^^^
More bovine insults.  If you can't be original, at least learn to spell, 
you cretin.

>Texas, the biggest pile of shit in the world, from the biggest
>assholes.

And more Texas insults.  I see.  The reason it's taken you so long to 
respond is because you've been busy lurking until you had plagiarized
enough material to muster a post.

>
>-- no sig necessary --
>       Aza

Right.  No sig is necessary.  Your posts are immediately attributable
by their stultifying lameness, spelling errors, juvenile reliance on
scatology, and overall stupidity.  You might as well leave it off.

-- Andy (The Mysterious Stranger)  
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Did you know....?
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:37:46 GMT


that despite the foul odor of fish eminating from him, troll is male,
not female.


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jallen@bgsu.edu (Joshua Allen (Rave!))
Subject: Re: Melba Melba
Organization: Bowling Green State Univ.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 22:15:06 GMT

>Why would I call you Hum when your name is Chris.
[Why would I call you Hum when your name is Chris?]

     PROVE IT!  I've asked you twice to show your proof, and you've
     continued spew the same pointless jiz.  Until you present evidence 
     showing that my name is Chris (which it isn't), then you are doing 
     nothing but spouting the same TIRESOME, _unsubstantiated_, SHIT.  

     ONE LAST TIME:
     Either show everybody your proof, or FUCK OFF.
                                                 
>Shit!  Dobson is right, K e n is spreading.

     I knew I was dealing with a puny intellect, but I thought you could
     at least think of your own replies.

>Melba P. Glabb

--Leah
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bondc@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Clay M. Bond)
Subject: Re: Clearly NOT a FORGERY
Organization: Indiana University
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:39:36 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.182235.17682@wolves.uucp> news@wolves.uucp (The Wolfe of the Den) writes:

>	I sell Usenet clues to idiots like you.  It's a nasty job, but,
>like being a sanitation worker, someone has to do it.

What's this?  Mr. Whine_about_the_flaming Woodbury wrote this,
and without alliteration yet?  What's the world coming to!



-- 
"There is no gate, no lock, no bolt that you can set upon
 the freedom of my mind."
			   -- Virginia Woolf
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Two in Hemet
Date: 23 Nov 1992 15:06:41 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <23951@galaxy.ucr.edu>,
judson@watserv.ucr.edu (Michael Judson) writes:
>So I'm dirving through this shithole town in Southern California called
>Hemet.  I come across a Denny's restaurant.  Fine, I say to myself.  But
>then, long and behold, not more than three blocks away, guess what?  I
>come across another fuck'n Denny's.  Can you believe that?  Two Denny's
>not more than eyesight apart from each other in one fuck'n town.  Only
>a town like Hemet would do something like that.
>But wait, there's more.  Unlike most towns which have one road leading
>to it, Hemet has not one, but two different ways of getting there.  From
>Los Angeles, you can either arive from the North, or from the West.
>Shit man, what a town.

 ... yo, sherlock, which part did you miss??   you DID say you were
driving in SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, didn't you?  did you forget to check
your reality at the state line?

>
>--
>"It takes a big man to cry.
>but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man."
>                                Jack Handy
 ... teeheeheehhaaaaahaaheehee <*whew*> i feel better now

>
>
>judson@watserv.ucr.edu

a better man, probably, albeit a woman :)
moi
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Bush? (was: Why Clinton)
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:00:48 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
: In article <1417@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
: >weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
: >: In article <1409@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
: >: >vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
: 
: >
: >The original post was wrong, Willy, only if one clings to a
: >curiously mule-headed literal-mindedness.  The convo, if memory
: >serves, went something like this:
: >
: >Interviewer: Surely you recognize that atheists are citizens
: >			 of this country?
: >
: >			 Our Only President: No, I'm not sure they should be
: >			 considered citzens...
: >
: >			 Now, if there's a way to interpret that which doesn't
: >			 involve the President of the United States questioning
: >			 the right to citizenship based on religious belief, I
: 
: 	You really need to learn how to pay attention. No, I mean this. You
: really should see someone about this problem.
: 	Now that you've shown you can remember the supposed 'proof'. Let's see
: if you can remember that that wasn't the point. If you can extend you memory
: all the way back to the original post, you'll see that this 'proof' does not
: support the orinal statement, which is what I was arguing with.
: 
: William Everett       

But, Wilbur, nobody I've ever met is terribly interested in whether
the third letter from the left in the original post was an 'i' or a
'j'.  Your argument only has relevance to anything at all if you're
claiming that Bush didn't mean what the original poster said he
meant.  If you are claiming that, then please tell us what he did 
mean.  If you are not claiming that, please stop posting ridiculous
semantic nit-picking.
Shit or get off the pot, Willy-Boy.
Bill    
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
Subject: Re: The Moral Majority is Neither
Organization: QQQCLC
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:19:06 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.054027.29839@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> cpassare@nyx.cs.du.edu (Charles Passarelli) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.201048.5552@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barr
>) writes:
>>	Shit. Guess I need to look in on the boring, brain-dead world of
>>alt.flame more often. Schechter, you pus-filled sore, I didn't write the
>>censorious nonsense you attribute to me, it was written by a juvenile
>>loser who styles himself "Uncle Fester". _I_ flamed _him_ for it.
>>
>>						Kayembee
>
>Well, the attribution was wrong, as you said.

	Congratulations, Charles. The obvious doesn't always escape you.

>But speaking of 'brain-dead', perhaps you should go back over
>ol' Fester's posts and try _reading_ them this time.
>Nothing he said was 'censorious nonsense'.

	Here, take my hand, and we'll go slow this time: he said
pictures like that shouldn't be posted, and he said he _hadn't_ _seen_
the picture in question. Now do you get it?

>Do you like 10 year old girls, or what?

	Maybe; you got any seesters?

>What are you supposed to be styled as, a toy store? [Kayembee]

	Like, duh. "KMB" are my initials, swifty. But what with only my
first and last name appearing in my article headers, I can understand
how a mental giant like yourself might miss that.

						Kayembee
From: kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 19 Nov 92 14:44:11 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b64746.student.cwru.edu

In article <k7mHuB2w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
>Shit, what does it take to get him to be sure?  Four years later people are
>still writing him letters asking for an apology, and he's still replying that
>he stands by his original comments.  Doesn't sound very fucking unsure to me.
>
>I can't believe that nobody's shown him a copy of the Constitution, so I
>suppose it comes down to the fact that George is unsure whether he should
>uphold the Constitution or not.

	A civil suit has been brought against him and his press advisor. I 
believe the outcome has been delayed indefinantly by behind the scenes 
pressure to stall the suit.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 22:12:46 GMT

> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) ("Billy 'da Skid") writes:
> The Phascist Phantom is making gratuitous and offensive "fag"
> references.  Best to ignore him; he's a silly little ghost, and
> will probably go away if he doesn't get the attention he so
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  
> desparately craves.

Ah. I see. Is this why you followup on the same post four times in a row Mr.
Skid? 

--The Phantom
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Bush? (was: Why Clinton)
Date: 16 Nov 92 20:47:05 GMT
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711

In article <1992Nov16.094811.27190@umr.edu> ckincy@mcs213f.cs.umr.edu (Charles Kincy) writes:

>You, sir, are a fuckhead.  It is little wonder to me that they
>ran your little fascist ass out of a.p.h quicker than shit.  You
	Ahhhh... all these boring and ignorant post and here's one that's
 vulgar and ignorant. It almost cheers my heart.

>disgust anyone that his human, you bletcherous minion of death and
	What are you talking about?

>destruction.  
>
	Bad day?

>What was the original statement?  That Bush says we should deny
>citizenship to athiests?  Ok, he didn't *say* that.  But he did 
>carelessly admit how he felt that atheists should not be citizens.
>Anyone who harbors thoughts such as these should *not* be 
	No, he said he wasn't sure. In case your not familiar with it, that's
political doublespeak. It's not really a definite statement of anything.

>President under *any* circumstances.  You listening to me boy?
	yes, but I'm not sure why.
>Good.
>
>Now get the fuck out of here, before you cause your ego further
>damage. 
	My ego? Really, I might be worried if you hadn't shown yourself 
completely incapable of such a thing.
>
>cpk

William Everett
From: bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: re: samant seys
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:22:28 GMT
Organization: Bowling Green State University

The enigmatic        writes:
>First, I apologise to bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu for replying so
>late, but you must excuse me since I have a life too.

  No problem.

>My original question has been answered. To recap, it was "is the 
>irony too subtle for your brain?" I can rest for some time, knowing 
>that it is.

  HA HA!  How cute!  But don't you think you're missing something?

--Leah
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: PORTRAIT OF A NET IDIOT: MAC (Troll Version 2.1)
Date: 17 Nov 92 18:46:57 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton

In article <1992Nov11.065956.3446@midway.uchicago.edu>, samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar Samant) writes:

> This is the true story of MAC, the well loved, dung for brains poster. You
> might be slightly puzzled - after all this begins to sound like MAC has a
> life to talk about. He has. Really. It began when he, at the age of twelve
> days, was found on the steps of the GSF Center at NASA. The director of the
> center, being especially kind hearted, thought that the least she could do 
> was give the baby an account on one of the Suns. 
> Thus MAC got a computer account, and soon he became the meanest little infant
> in that quaint playpen for net infants, alt.cascade. To a cascade like

*That's funny, I always thought that MAC was a reserach animal, hence the M for 
monkey, that NASA used in all of its moonshot or at least cumshot experiments.
I figured that the nature of their experiment was to chain MAC to the computer
station and let him "monkey" with the keyboard in an attempt to discern whether
he had any intelligence.  Then they shot him into outer space with Neil 
Armstrong to see if the the lunar landing would make him smarter.  Upon
restoring MAC to his Earthly terminal they found that he was still the same
simian simpleton that we know and love, just craving for a banana and an
occasional pat on the head.  So, if you're out there, my little friend, *pat
pat*. 

					Troll
> Sincerely,
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Once again, a non-American tries to tell US what OUR constitution says. what an asshole.
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:43:22 GMT

In article <960@dsbc.icl.co.uk> kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:

>Another point to get you wound up into an even greater frenzy.  Your
>constitution, I beleive, calls for religious equality, what religion do
>athiests have? and what makes them think that they deserve equality
>under the US constitution?


No, no, no, you stupid fucking limey asswipe. The consitution (actually
the 1st amendment) says:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
<***Contrast this to the Thoecracy of Britain, where the Anglican
Church is the official religion> or prohibiting the free excerise
thereof.

and applies this to the states with amendment 14:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the 
privileges or immunities of citizens of the UNited States..

I dont believe that the word 'equality' actually appears anywhere
in the US Consitution.

Is that clear, you asshole?


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: cpassare@nyx.cs.du.edu (Charles Passarelli)
Subject: Re: The Moral Majority is Neither
Summary: Kayembee learns ABC's
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 06:06:22 GMT


In article <1992Nov17.191906.23396@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com
(Kenn Barry) writes with his crayons:

KB>Congratulations, Charles. The obvious doesn't always escape you.

	It's obvious that you just like to flame people
	for imagined slights.

KB>Here, take my hand, and we'll go slow this time: he said
KB>pictures like that shouldn't be posted, and he said he _hadn't_ _seen_
KB>the picture in question. Now do you get it?

	Seems to me you didn't read everything he said.
	In follow-up posts, he *had* seen the picture.
	In every post, he said kiddy-nudes don't belong
	in a.b.p.EROTICA.  He said there is a place for
        everything and a.b.p.EROTICA was *not* the place.
	And you'll find that he wasn't the only one saying
        that.  He just happened to be the first along
	with taz@nomad.  If you wish to go back and read
	the thread again, the subject was:
	Pedophiles and NAMBLA'ites GET OUT NOW!
	You turned it into The Moral Majority is Neither.
	You deleted everything he said between the first
	line up until "What does that tell you?"
	Inside the body of the post he described people
	posting in a.b.p.e. requesting pics of kids 
	having sex with other kids and adults.  He didn't
	want to see a.b.p.e. turned into a distribution
	point for child molesters to get their kicks from
	and threaten the existence of a.b.p.e.  I don't
	feel it is my responsibility to educate you on
	how to read for comprehension, so I suggest you
	head for the nearest community college that will
	accept your under-qualified talents and take
	Reading with Dick and Jane.

	You can try to turn this into another "Bush didn't
	say it" argument like other threads in alt.flame,
	but it doesn't matter.  Uncle Fester put you in
	your proper place in the end and there you shall
	remain.


-Charles
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:48:48 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
: In article <1449@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Arch-Angel Anderson) writes:
: >
: > Since Mr. K. Ryan has kindly re-posted his informative material
: > on Georgie Bush's atheist remarks, fulfilling Casper the Phriendly
: > Phantom's request to have his short-term memory backed up, I will
: > ONCE AGAIN pose the the questions the Limbots have been dodging:
: > 
: >  [ Belch ]
: >
: What the HELL does it matter arsewipe.  George Bush is no more.
: You have a new dictator now.  Go and pick some holes in him, dickcheese.
: 
: -- 
:    _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
:   _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
:  _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
: _/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _


Oh, Christ- this wallabee-fucking strine geek is fixated on me now.
Somebody wanna divert him for me, maybe wave a kangaroo dick at him
or something?  I'll sneak up behind him and untie his shoes, so's
he falls off the bottom of the planet...
Bill
From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: To shitCANada and the Kanucks.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 13:34:47 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
> Well Kanuck, at least my country isn't so dependent on foreign investment lik
> your leech nation.

Priceless.  Absolutely priceless.

Which of these is the odd one out:

   Burger King
   Reebok
   CBS Records


mathew
From: kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: American pratt.
Summary: Fuck you arse hole.
Date: 23 Nov 92 17:18:03 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <1992Nov20.154322.16266@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Senator Dobson) writes:
> 
> >
> >Another point to get you wound up into an even greater frenzy.  Your
> >constitution, I beleive, calls for religious equality, what religion do
> >athiests have? and what makes them think that they deserve equality
> >under the US constitution?
> >
> No, no, no, you stupid fucking limey asswipe. The consitution (actually
> the 1st amendment) says:
> 
> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
> <***Contrast this to the Thoecracy of Britain, where the Anglican
> Church is the official religion> or prohibiting the free excerise
> thereof.
> 
> and applies this to the states with amendment 14:
> 
> No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the 
> privileges or immunities of citizens of the UNited States..
> 
> I dont believe that the word 'equality' actually appears anywhere
> in the US Consitution.
> 
> Is that clear, you asshole?
>
No that's not clear, you arsehole.  Did you read my post or are you
just too wound up.  Listen, you flag-waving, halfwit, lame-brained
bastard.  The point you were attempting to reply to actually points
out that your fucking constition only deals with religious equality.

Contradicting that statement with one that proves the point only shows
what an arse-licker you really are.  Does quoting your goddamned
constitution give you are hard-on or somthing.

Jumping Jesus on a Trampoline, you even deleted the bit where I
called you a mother-fucker - somthing to hide have you?

If my last post got you worked up this much the you must be
creaming your jeans by now.  I can't wait for your next post to
wing its way over here so I can call you an arsehole again.

Now, that ends todays lecture on social behaviour in the '90s
and how those yanks who wrap themselves in the flag are as much
use as a dodo with a hard on.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/
Newsgroups: alt.flame