HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pvanmeur@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Pim van Meurs)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Quayle Smashes Gore...
Date: 14 Oct 92 07:02:46 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <1992Oct14.005736.14928@athena.cs.uga.edu> tedr@athena.cs.uga.edu (Ted Kalivoda) writes:
>Well, like I thought would happen, Quayle demoloshid Gore in the debate.  It
>looks like Quayle could be the only thing that might possibly save Bush.  
>
>Ted K.

 agree he is probably the best thing the republicans have left.
Are we getting desperate ?


Pim
-- 
Pim van Meurs  UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Mail Code A-030  	 UUCP : ...!ucsd!ssurf.ucsd.edu!VANMEURS
UCSD La Jolla  CA 92093  ARPA : VANMEURS@ssurf.ucsd.edu
(619)-458 9729 Home	 Bitnet : VANMEURS%ssurf.ucsd.edu@sdsc
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6407 alt.rush-limbaugh:6803
From: KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh on Madonna (was Re: Summary Mon 10/5/92)
Date: 8 Oct 92 00:32:48 GMT
 <92280.013331KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> <1992Oct6.221148.12235@s1.gov>
Distribution: world,usa,alt,na

In article <1992Oct6.221148.12235@s1.gov>, lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich) says:

>>To you also get offended by Helen Keller jokes, Christa McAuliffe jokes,
>>or blonde jokes?

>        Yes, I do. I don't think that that kind of humor is in very
>good taste when the victims are clearly undeserving of that kind of
>treatment.

Well, I have bad news for you.  Almost all humor pokes fun at -someone-
or -something-, whether deserving or not.  I find none of it offensive
unless people start to actually -believe- the content of those jokes.

>        And would you get offended by fat-redneck jokes?

Heck no.  Nor any group I'd be considered a part of, such as German-Irish
jokes, or Christian jokes (again, as long as it's not a serious attack on
what I believe), or PSU student jokes, or middle-class jokes, man-jokes,
four-eyed jokes, etc.

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: emiller@convex.com (Evan Miller)
Subject: clintonhair
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
Distribution: alt
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 20:36:39 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

What I really want to know is:  How many of you think Clinton dyes
his hair?  The pictures Rush showed seemed pretty convincing - from
white to dark.  Unless Rush doctored the pictures, I'm afraid I 
have to come to the same conclusion he did.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich)
Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh on Madonna (was Re: Summary Mon 10/5/92)
Keywords: Unofficial Summary Rush Limbaugh
Organization: LLNL
Distribution: world,usa,alt,na
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 01:47:53 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.153833.12030@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:
>In article <1992Oct8.005556.29945@s1.gov> lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich) writes:

@ 	And how was the
@ movie decadent? What is self-evident to you may not be self-evident to
@ others.

>How about masturbation through her clothes on stage?  She said, on one 
>of those Entertainment Tonight clones, that she had an orgasm on stage.

	How is that supposed to be so _terrible_? It sounds like she
was enjoying what she was doing :-)

	I saw it myself when she performed in the Bay Area and also on
HBO, and I enjoyed it.

	What's wrong with a woman liking sex? Are women supposed to
simply lie back and think of their homelands? Is the enjoyment of sex
supposed to be a male monopoly?

>Good enough for you?

	Almost :-)
From: dpage@ra.csc.ti.com (Doug Page)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Religious rights and responsibilities
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:26:35 GMT
Distribution: na, usa
Organization: Texas Instruments

In article <1992Oct6.194027.27391@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>, tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes:
|> Christian principles - isn't that what the inquisition was based on?

Which Christian principles are you refering to ?

Doug Page

***  The opinions are mine and do not necessarily represent those of my  ***
***  employer.                                                           ***
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Religious rights and responsibilities
From: bthomas@perdita.gac.edu (Barbara L Thomas)
Date: 7 Oct 92 14:32:53 -0600

In article <1992Oct6.194027.27391@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>  writes:
> Christian principles - isn't that what the inquisition was based on?
If you were trying to be offensive, you succeeded - so was the settlement  
of the colonies.  If you want to have an intelligent debate of a subject,  
please, be logical not "witty."
--
Barbara L. Thomas
"The World may never know."
bthomas@nic.gac.edu
From: davoli@natinst.com (Russell Davoli)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Summary Wed 10/14/92
Date: 15 Oct 1992 12:12:10 -0500
Organization: National Instruments, Austin, TX
NNTP-Posting-Host: eagle.natinst.com

In article <1bitemINNi54@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> aa680@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Vern Morrison) writes:
>
>     Today, Rush and his listeners, a bunch of brain-dead sad sacks who
>haven't read fifteen books in their lifetimes, will piss and moan about
>Bill Clinton, the man who, in less than three weeks, will be elected
>President of the United States.

Today, Rush's critics and their sympathizers, a bunch of bleeding-heart
liberal know-it-alls who have read sixteen books in their lifetimes, will
piss and moan about Rush Limbaugh, the man who, in less than three weeks,
will still be on the radio for the next four years.

Sorry, couldn't resist.  :-)

Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6932 alt.rush-limbaugh:7487
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 00:51:54 EDT
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE #1
Distribution: world,usa,alt,na

In article <grendel.719085040@camelot>, grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha
Bourgea) says:

>And as far as the Veep contest goes, Gore clearly won.
>Quayle made the usual idiot of himself.  The man needs no help from the
>media; he perpetuates the myth with every word he speaks.  Stockdale was
>a joke.  Only Gore maintained a sense of maturity and a command of the facts.

This is further evidence, to me, that debates generally serve to reinforce
people's prejudices and preferences regarding the candidates.

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich)
Subject: Re: Summary Wed 10/7/92
Keywords: Unofficial Summary Rush Limbaugh
Organization: LLNL
Distribution: world,usa,alt,na
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 02:10:44 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.231441.10543@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>o       Sinead O'Connor is inspiring a lot of anger among viewers
>because of her actions on Saturday Night Live. Rush is amazed,
>though, that although it is clear that O'Connor is a typical
>liberal who blames everyone else for her problems, nobody is
>talking about how badly she sings.

	Just like "Anything going wrong? It's those rotten
*liberals*" Rush Limbaugh himself?

	Let's let whoever has committed no sin throw the first stone
here.

>O'Connor also evidently likes being ugly, since she goes out of
>her way to be "coyote ugly" - you know a woman is "coyote ugly"
>if a man wakes up next to her and if she is holding onto his arm,
>he would rather gnaw his arm off at the shoulder rather than wake
>her up.

	Ditto for my first comment.

	Anyone as far as being an Adonis as he is should not complain
about the appearance of other people, and especially should not
complain about how Sinead is not being a good sex object.

	I can certainly agree that it is legitimate to criticize
Sinead for seemingly considering the Pope the Great Satan, but I would
like to ask what is the _right_ way to criticize the Pope if one
believe that there is good reason to do so.
From: lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Two down... one to go!
Date: 9 Oct 92 08:26:45 GMT
Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Originator: lip@s1.gov


In article <1992Oct8.004510.22586@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:

|> Rush Limbaugh is the MOST listened to on the radio 
|> and the MOST read in the non-fiction books section... In history.

	Says who?

|> If he becomes the MOST watched person on TV, it'll make Rush Limbaugh
|> the absolutely most paid-attention-to person in the United States of
|> America, all around. 

	Not unless he changes the format of his show and invites
guests on to argue with, like "Wally" does. If Rush's show goes the
way of "Wally"'s show, then it will be a great honor to be thrown out
by him.

	And if Madonna's upcoming book _Sex_ becomes an even _bigger_
seller than Rush's book, ... hmmm ...

|> -----Steve Chaney: Founder, Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.0-------

	Resistance is futile.
	All must be absorbed.

	I see.

/Loren
From: larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush is bad for our country
Date: 16 Oct 92 17:36:57 GMT
	<1992Oct12.124730.2142@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>
	<1992Oct05.185808.22619@anomaly.sbs.r
	<1992Oct12.205234.16769@news.ysu.edu>
	<1992Oct13.190408.19387@wdl.loral.com>
Organization: New Mexico State University, MetaPhysical Science Laboratory

In article <1992Oct13.190408.19387@wdl.loral.com> eric@wdl35.wdl.loral.com (Eric Kuhnen) writes:

   ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) writes:
   >In a previous article, eric@wdl35.wdl.loral.com (Eric Kuhnen) says:
   >>ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) has in is .sig:
   >>>*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  //  Newsflash from the Vatican: *
				     ^^^^^^^
   >>>*      the KelleyMan:Kelley L. Miller  //  "Easter has been cancelled...*    
   >>>*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  //  Someone found the body...."   *
   >>>****************Know God...No peace.  No God...Know peace.***************
   >>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   >>Know Dictionary...Know Difference Between Agnosticism and Atheism
   >>

   >Huh?

   I was reading your messages and then saw your .sig.  Since you used a little
   word play about knowing God and knowing Peace, and you claimed to be an
   Atheist, I thought I would poke a little fun at your use of "Atheist" and
   borrow from your word play at the same time.

   I seriously doubt that you have incontrovertable proof that God doesn't
   exist; therefore, you cannot call yourself an Atheist, according to the
   definition of "atheism."

   Furthermore, I testify that the only way lasting Peace may be achieved is
   by knowing the true character of God.

   Eric

Oh no! Not another Holy War starting..

Let me get my Bobble, so I can look up all the quotes...

L.
"Yeh, Buddy..            | larry@psl.nmsu.edu (Larry Cunningham)|  _~~_
 I've got your COMPUTER! | % Physical Science Laboratory        | (O)(-)
 Right HERE!!"           | New Mexico State University          |  /..\ 
 (computer THIS!)        | Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 88003    |   <> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are CORRECT, mine, and not PSLs or NMSUs..
Oh sure, we could do it the _easy_ way. But it just wouldn't be the COWBOY WAY.
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:22:01 GMT
Subject: Re: A Note on Book Sales
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
From: el27166@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (This Space for Rent)
Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh on Madonna (was Re: Summary Mon 10/5/92)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: world,usa,alt,na
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 01:59:37 GMT
Keywords: Unofficial Summary Rush Limbaugh

lanier@acpub.duke.edu (Dustin Lanier) writes:

>In article <BvoKoC.F44@news.cso.uiuc.edu> el27166@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (This Space for Rent) writes:
>>[Rush taking a jab at Madonna deleted]
>>
>>The thought of Rush Limbaugh on Madonna is certainly not a pleasant one.
>>

>I'm sure it is for Rush. :)

>Dustin Lanier

I can just see the headlines now:
"Madonna's Last Words:  What a Rush!"  -  New York Post

"Madonna's Body Found
 Crushed Limbaugh
 to Blame"                             -  Miami Herald

"I Didn't Call Her a Feminazi
 I called her a FemiYahtzee!"          -  Rush Limbaugh (Weekly World News)
-- 
Eu-Ming Lee (aka CyberGeek)                      el27166@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
"Nobody told me there'd be .sigs like these."
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-&{&gp% +/)@ooooooo
NO CARRIER
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: arras@forwiss.uni-erlangen.de (Michael Arras)
Subject: Rush will never die (was Re: rush)
Organization: FORWISS, Uni Erlangen, Germany
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 00:21:44 GMT


Mr V A Noronha (ecpzp@csv.warwick.ac.uk) wrote:
>********  If anyone out there is worried that Rush might not die, let me put
>their mind at rest.  I offer you a money-back guarantee that Rush will die
>*sooner or later*. ***********

	Well, don't you wish it was as easy as that.  First we had Reagen,
now Limbaugh, who's next?  I don't think it's Rush so much as the ideas and
thoughts he talks about.  You may be able to kill Rush, but you can't
kill conservatism (although you may try).  There are a lot of other people
with conservative values and a natural entertaining personality who could
probably get the same ratings as Rush, if Rush went off the air.

Mike Arras
arras@forwiss.uni-erlangen.de
From: lape@cs.utk.edu (Bryon S. Lape)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: A Note on Book Sales
Date: 8 Oct 92 20:29:21 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - CS Department
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: duncan.cs.utk.edu

>vast majority of people I know are Democrats and are going to probably
>vote for Clinton-Gore.  Yet I do not know one single person that has read
>'The Comeback Kid' or Gore's book on the environment -- not one.  Yet, I
		       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

	The local Knoxville paper had environmentalists quoted of saying
that Gore's book is significant, but they have not read it yet!

	BTW, for those of you confused, Tennessee has the 47th worst
air/water quality.


Bryon Lape


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   The American education system only teaches you to go into debt,
		fortunately, I know how to get out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: mem@mv.mv.com (Mark E. Mallett)
Subject: Re: Rush is bad for our country
Organization: MV Communications, Inc.
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 07:12:51 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.131337.27752@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> jbuckner@lonestar.utsa.edu (James A. Buckner) writes:
> Tell Tom Foley to go suck
>on a gas pipe.
>Tell Albert Bustamante to eat some toxic waste!!!!
>And tell 'ol Al Gore to go blow himself!!
>
>These are my own opinions. 

Those are not opinions.  Those are just crude remarks.

-mm-

-- 
Mark E. Mallett  MV Communications, Inc./ PO Box 4963/ Manchester NH/ 03108
Bus. Phone: 603 429 2223    Home: 603 424 8129     BIX: mmallett
Internet: mem@mv.MV.COM  ( uucp: ...{decvax|harvard}!mv!mem )
Looking for news and mail in southern NH / northern MA?  Try MV!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: aaiken@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Andrew C. Aiken)
Subject: Re: GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 17:40:20 GMT

In <1992Oct9.213935.9340@genome.wi.edu> asmith@vax.wi.edu () writes:

>In article <BvtL5H.LoL@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, aaiken@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Andrew C. Aiken) writes:
>>In <9210081734.AA21296@MIT.EDU> bowler@athena.mit.edu (Bert Smith) writes:
>>
>>>Distribution:
>>>  Org >internet:Clinton-Org@ai.mit.edu
>>>  Jock Gill [70670,2477]
>>
>>Why is a campaign organization allowed to use university-owned equipment
>>to further its cause?  Not to mention Internet?
>>

>This use is legit and legal.

[...]


As I mentioned in an e-mail note to Bert Smith,  I stand corrected
and I retract my implication that the net is being used improperly.




Andrew Aiken

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh


 In article <92283.024408KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick) writes:
> 
 >
 >Since Gennifer Flowers actually made the claim, I think there might be
 >a chance that it actually happened.  (Not that I care much, but at least
 >the whole story wasn't just a figment of someone's imagination.)
 
You ought to pay more attention to your chubby god, Rush L.
He would (one would hope) smack you upside your dittohead
for saying something like this.  If this sort of logic made
sense, then we could condemn Clarence Thomas in EXACTLY the same way.

I think that if you want to pretend to be interested in truth, you
may want to pretend to be consistent in your application of what
qualifies as a reasonable indictment.

doug
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:28:13 GMT
Subject: Re: Re: Rush Limbaugh: a Misogynist Boor?
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
From: eric@wdl35.wdl.loral.com (Eric Kuhnen)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush is bad for our country
Date: 12 Oct 92 19:49:09 GMT
Organization: Loral Western Development Labs

ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) has in is .sig:
>*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  //  Newsflash from the Vatican: *
>*      the KelleyMan:Kelley L. Miller  //  "Easter has been cancelled...*    
>*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  //  Someone found the body...."   *
>****************Know God...No peace.  No God...Know peace.***************

Know Dictionary...Know Difference Between Agnosticism and Atheism

Eric
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

My opinions are based upon Reason and Logic, and are therefore not connected
in any way to my employer.
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Stuff about Clinton
Date: 15 Oct 92 21:14:25 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes:

> In article <1992Oct13.050240.29059@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
> 
> >I wanted to see what it was like to vote for Clinton, so I went into the
> >bathroom and flushed the toliet.
> 
> And the toilet said "Busssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh".

Now this was funny.  Kudos.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle)
Subject: Re: PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE #1
Summary: PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE #1
Organization: Psych Department, Indiana University
Distribution: world,usa,alt,na
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 15:35:16 GMT

ecpzp@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr V A Noronha) writes:
>Marks out of 10 for the combatants:

>Bush      7

    I would've given Bush a 6. Too much of the same old same old.

>Clinton   7

    And I would've given Clinton a 5. His delivery was wooden and lacked 
vitality. He could perhaps benefit from studying those "Audio Dynamics"
vocabulary building tapes.

>Perot     8.5

    Right on, for this one. Perot told the best jokes, got the best laughs, 
and made the best points. His crack about being "all ears" had me rolling.
He might not make a good president but he has a great career ahead as a 
stand-up comic.

>RESULT:  Perot takes votes from Clinton but not enough to save Bush's 
>bacon

    Hopefully.

>If George Bush wants to avoid looking for a new home soon, he'd better 
>take off his gloves.

    That's what I'm expecting, however I think that if George starts a new 
round of negative campaigning it'll can his cookies. People are tired of 
it. At this point if Bush wants to help his cause then it's real issues or 
nothing.

> Let's face it.  Clinton is a draft-dodging, dope-smoking, lie-telling 
>adulterer.

    Thank goodness you're not biased about our boy "Slick".

>  Is this the man Americans are going to entrust with the 
>leadership of the Free World?

    I dunno. I hope so. I'm voting for him.

>Who's going to win the Quayle-Gore contest?  With Gore having everything 
>to lose, my money's on V-President Quayle.

    I'd have said that Quayle stands to lose more than Gore. After all, 
if Clinton and Gore lose the election Quayle isn't likely to move into 
Gore's house.

--
Nathan Engle                        Software Juggler
Psychology Department               Indiana University
nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu      nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu
From: dan@ektools.kodak.com (Daniel P. Schaertel)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: TEST
Date: 8 Oct 92 12:57:59 GMT


This is just a test.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: crosmun@crosmun.rtp.dg.com (William Crosmun)
Subject: Re: A Technical Request
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 13:03:46 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Data General Corporation, RTP, NC.

In article <grendel.719012990@camelot> grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:
>In <1992Oct13.202315.28684@csc.ti.com> dpage@ra.csc.ti.com (Doug Page) writes:
>
>>In article <grendel.719003246@camelot>, grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:
>>|> In <1992Oct12.195328.571@dg-rtp.dg.com> crosmun@crosmun.rtp.dg.com (William Crosmun) writes:
>>|> 
>>|> >In article <1992Oct11.015308.25586@netcom.com> ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
>>|> >>crosmun@crosmun.rtp.dg.com (William Crosmun) writes ...
>>|> >>>In article <BD.92Oct7104850@fluent.UUCP> bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU writes:
>>|> >stalled under Bush?  Clinton is promising to run it in reverse. Has Bush gotten
>>|> >us involved in a war?  Clinton wants to get involved in Bosnia-Herzegovina.  
>>|> 
>>|> You must not have watched the first debate.  Clinton specifically said he
>>|> wants to reduce troops in Europe.
>
>>What? You mean that you don't recognize Slick Willie sitting high in the
>>straddle again ?????
>
>Misnomer.  Maybe you disagree, but I don't see the ability to change one's
>mind as a sign of weakness.  I think it shows strength, in fact: an ability
>to adapt to new information and really think about one's positions.  I
>don't care what Governor Clinton may have said in the past.  I am concen-
>trating on what he is saying now, which is that he wants to reduce troops.
>What Bush is saying now is that he does not.

I see.  What he says last week doesn't count. It's what he says this week that
matters.  I suggest, when you go buy a used car, that you take someone with
you.

>
>


===============================================================================
William Crosmun
crosmun@dg-rtp.dg.com

===============================================================================

"We have to tell our children that they must redefine their relationship to 
 the sky, and they must begin to think of the sky as a threatening part of 
 their environment."
		  
		  Earth in the Balance -- Al Gore

===============================================================================
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6640 alt.rush-limbaugh:7060
From: lanier@acpub.duke.edu (Dustin Lanier)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh on Madonna (was Re: Summary Mon 10/5/92)
Keywords: Unofficial Summary Rush Limbaugh
Date: 10 Oct 92 23:31:37 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Distribution: world,usa,alt,na
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

In article <BvoKoC.F44@news.cso.uiuc.edu> el27166@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (This Space for Rent) writes:
>[Rush taking a jab at Madonna deleted]
>
>The thought of Rush Limbaugh on Madonna is certainly not a pleasant one.
>

I'm sure it is for Rush. :)


>Eu-Ming Lee (aka CyberGeek)                      el27166@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu

Dustin Lanier
lanier@acpub.duke.edu