HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: axd7104@acfcluster.nyu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: FCC Call letters
Date: 11 Apr 92 00:39:08 GMT
Organization: New York University

In article <cfO602cs0fva01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>, tjc50@ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll) writes:
> I note that the regulation assumes 3-character call signs, so that in
> itself would lead me to believe that it's been modified, but I can't find
> such a modifcation.  Plus, as someone else posted, there are some Canadian

It's not that the regulation assumed 3-character call signs.  What they
were doing was assigning PREFIXES.  In other words, when it says that the
US 'owns' WAA-WZZ, that means the US can use any call sign that STARTS
with anything from WAA to WZZ, no matter how long the call sign is.

-- 
Aaron Dickey                      Bitnet: axd7104@nyuacf
New York University             Internet: axd7104@ACFcluster.nyu.edu

Al Roker Is God.
From: lasner@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Charles Lasner)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Marilyn Really Doesn't Have to be too Goddam Smart to Keep Her Job
Date: 17 Apr 92 15:44:12 GMT
Reply-To: lasner@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Charles Lasner)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <1992Apr16.171843.4399@PA.dec.com> mikkelson@breakr.enet.dec.com (snopes) writes:
>
>In article <1992Apr16.002341.7848@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>, 
>  phil@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Phil Gustafson) writes...
>
>>  You pour one cup of 100% bran cereal in a bowl.  Then you pour one cup
>>  of 40% bran cereal on top of it.  What percent bran cereal do you now
>>  have in the bowl?  My wife says 140%, and my brother-in-law says 60%.
>>  I say it depends on whether you pour the 100% bran cereal or the 40%
>>  bran cereal in the bowl first [!? -- ed] -- that is, whether you want to
>>  dilute or add.  Who's right?
>
>Um, once you pick a bowl of bran, does the wife _always_ reveal the empty
>bowl before offering to let you switch bran percentages?
>
>- snopes

This is likely OAT bran, but in any case isn't GOAT bran.

cjl (it isn't popcorn-stuffed turkey either)
From: mikkelson@thewav.enet.dec.com (snopes)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Marilyn Really Doesn't Have to be too Goddam Smart to Keep Her Job
Date: 17 Apr 92 17:06:22 GMT
Article-I.D.: PA.1992Apr17.201240.17873
Organization: Fight Dyslexia Help!


>  You pour one cup of 100% bran cereal in a bowl.  Then you pour one cup
>  of 40% bran cereal on top of it.  What percent bran cereal do you now
>  have in the bowl?  My wife says 140%, and my brother-in-law says 60%.
>  I say it depends on whether you pour the 100% bran cereal or the 40%
>  bran cereal in the bowl first [!? -- ed] -- that is, whether you want to
>  dilute or add.  Who's right?

Now that we've gotten off on a tangent about whether the Japanese are an
economic power because we're so stupid, I have to ask:  Doesn't anybody else
think this question is obviously a spoof?  It sounds just a little too
cleverly worded to be the product of a patently stupid reader to me.  It
doesn't even mention the first answer that would most likely come to the minds 
of the mathematically feeble: 70%.

- snopes

+--------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|                                |                                            |
| David P. Mikkelson             |  According to a recent study, sex has now  |
| Digital Equipment Corporation  |  replaced smoking as the leading cause of  |
| Culver City, CA  USA           |  statistics.                               |
|                                |                                            |
+--------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
From: joltes@husc4.harvard.edu (Richard Joltes)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Whacky Flakey License plates
Keywords: licence
Date: 15 Apr 92 15:03:40 GMT
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold) writes:

[someone wrote...]

>>New Hampshire licence plates say "Live Free or Die".  Great state motto.
>
>And whose imprisoned criminals make those "Live Free or Die" plates...

Yeah, and we in the great State (whoops, Commonwealth) of Taxachusetts usually
ascribe the "Live Free or Die" motto to mean "Let me do whatever I darn well
please, no matter who I screw over in the process."  A fellow I know from N.H.
is really annoyed because he has to obey speed limits...his rationale is "if
I can drive that fast and keep my car under control, why should my speed be
limited?"  He doesn't seem to care that there are n other drivers on the same
road...

Of course, Mass. residents seem to be on the other end of the spectrum, and
want to control *everything*.  Maybe that's why there's this huge ozone wall
between the two states...or maybe that's just Lowell!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dick "anticipating flames..." Joltes			joltes@husc.harvard.edu
Hardware & Networking Manager, Computer Services 	joltes@husc.bitnet 
Harvard University Science Center

"Mind you, not as bad as the night Archie Pettigrew ate some
sheep's testicles for a bet...God, that bloody sheep kicked him..."
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: vkochend@isis.cs.du.edu (vance kochenderfer)
Subject: Re: Whacky Flakey License plates
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Keywords: licence
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 05:17:54 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.192704.29980@uwm.edu> spice@convex.csd.uwm.edu (Jam
s G Spice) writes:
a
>UL or not?  A New Hampshire man was arrested and prosecuted for
>covering up the "or Die" portion of the motto on his lisence plate.
>
A guy in Maine was arrested because he painted out the lobster on
his license plate... Seems the inlanders and those on the coast
don't get along very well..  I think the court ruled in his
favor.

Vance "Ask Ted. He'll know" Kochenderfer
Virginia Tech                    |  'Get me out of these ropes and into a
ae313406@vtcc1.cc.vt.edu         |   good belt of Scotch'    -Nick Danger
vkochend@nyx.cs.du.edu   <- New Address, try it first..

Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: phil@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Phil Gustafson)
Subject: Re: The wacky, flakey State
Keywords: Wayne & Garth; we have nothing bad to say about them
Organization: Famed Parquet Floor
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 01:43:10 GMT

(Name deleted to protect the guilty) writes:
>>>:-)
>>>:-)
>:-)
>:-)

Somebody needs to read the FAQ list for this group.

Phil
-- 
|play: phil@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG; {ames|pyramid|vsi1}!zorch!phil                |
|work: phil@gsi; sgi!gsi!phil            | Phil Gustafson                   |
| "Better a free bottle in front of me than a prefrontal lobotomy"          |
|                                      Fred (not Steve) Allen               |     
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: berger@atropa (Mike Berger)
Subject: Re: Stupid 60s song: yellow polka dot bikini
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 21:50:00 GMT

gateley@rice.edu (John Gateley) writes:
>My mom has a painting of a very young girl playing on the beach
>wearing (you guessed it) a yellow polka dot bikini. It was painted by
>a relative of mine (who probably lived/s in Kansas City). According to
>my mom, this painting was the inspiration for the yellow polka dot
>bikini song. Could this be true? I am tempted to disbelieve, but
>since it is not the typical chain (foafoafoafoaf...), I wonder.
*----
The song isn't about a very young girl, so it's hard to see how
that would be the inspiration.
--
	Mike Berger
	Department of Statistics, University of Illinois
	AT&TNET     217-244-6067
	Internet    berger@atropa.stat.uiuc.edu
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Tuesday, 14 Apr 1992 13:45:25 MST
From: <ICLNM@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Why did the chicken cross the road?

In article <1992Apr14.184436.24315@beaver.cs.washington.edu>,
mckenzie@cs.washington.edu (Neil McKenzie) says:
>
>Here are two ULs I have just heard from a friend.  They are not in the
>FAQ list (my copy, at least).
>
>1.  Turkeys, when left to themselves in a rainstorm, will drown.
>2.  If you tuck a chicken's head under its wing, it will fall asleep due
>    to the dark.  If it is not disturbed, it will stay asleep and in time
>    will starve to death.
>
Domestic turkeys.  They have been bred for one quality only - food.  In the
process we have created an incredibly stupid, helpless creature.  Wild turkeys
are another story.  They are legendary for their intelligence and resourceful-
ness.  BenFranklin wanted the turkey to be our national bird.  Wouldn't that
change Thanksgiving!
Loyd Means
Phoenix AZ
From: weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Falling bullets (was: Ask Marilyn? Not if you want the right answer!)
Date: 6 Apr 92 15:37:37 GMT
Reply-To: weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Organization: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
In-reply-to: uspam@mcl.mcl.ucsb.edu (Tom Maynard)

In article <uspam.702351559@mcl>, uspam@mcl (Tom Maynard) writes:
>>>Note especially that the fatal round entered through the roof of a car;
>>>clearly this bullet came down onto the victim from above.  

>>If it lodged in his heart, and the victim was sitting, then most likely
>>the bullet came in at an angle.

>Not necessarily.  [...]

Of course not necessarily.  Peter's "clearly" remains garbage.
-- 
-Matthew P Wiener (weemba@libra.wistar.upenn.edu)
From: jtchew@csa3.lbl.gov (JOSEPH T CHEW)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Today's conspiracy theory
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:54:45 GMT
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
Reply-To: jtchew@csa3.lbl.gov
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.198
Summary: Okay, let's try this a FOURTH time
Keywords: that's an old joke, sonny.
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4   

>    1.  Hanford radiated more in one day than Chernobyl in 5 years

Your friend overestimates Hanford -- or perhaps it would be more
accurate to say he underestimates Chernobyl.  Here are some estimates.

Chernobyl, 1986: 50 megacuries released to environment (core fire).

Kyshtym (Chelyabinsk-40), 1956: 2 to 20 megacuries released (Bulletin
  of the Atomic Scientists, October 1990).  Chemical explosion in a
  storage vault.

Hanford, WA, USA: 537 KILOcuries of iodine-131 released to atmosphere
  (BAS, February 1988).  Routine operations, except for one just-
  declassified _intentional_ release, the December 1949 "Green Run."
  Various other nuclides released.

Hanford storage:  Some 268 megacuries of mixed waste simmering away
  in those celebrated single- and double-wall underground storage 
  tanks. Mostly contained--knock on wood.  (Physics Today, March 1992).

Chelyabinsk-40 "storage": Possibly 100+ megacuries of transuranic
  and actinide wastes thought to have been basically dumped in a 
  bog with no attempt at containment; supposedly you can get a lethal
  dose in one hour standing on the bank  (BAS, May 1991).

As you can see, Hanford has the potential for significant one-shot
accidents and/or chronic leakage, and is generally a big mess, but
Chernobyl thus far easily retains its dubious honor as the worst 
accident, both in radiation release and in effects upon humans.  
I'm not sure where the Chelyabinsk-40 news lies on the continuum
from knowledge to speculation.

This discussion (much less speculation on epidemiological effects)
vastly oversimplifies a complicated subject.  Books could be written
about it. Factors include what exactly is released and how it is
released -- I suspect atmospheric weapons testing dwarfed the whole lot
in terms of sheer curies, but the fallout was dispersed widely for the
most part. (An estimate of this, too, should be available somewhere.)

It's a fascinating subject; the news of Chernobyl is frozen in my
mind like news of Pearl Harbor or JFK's assassination was for an 
earlier generation.  But I must get back to my real job.

Joe "Glow, little glowworm..." Chew
Xref: sparky alt.folklore.urban:11750 misc.kids:12525
From: johnnyb@ims.com (Johnny Battle)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,misc.kids
Subject: Re: Walla walla bing bang (was Re: Worm song?)
Date: 7 Apr 92 15:55:57 GMT
Organization: Integrated Measurement Systems, Inc.

In article <92097.112555ICLNM@ASUACAD.BITNET>, ICLNM@ASUACAD.BITNET writes:
|> It is usually the unusual that we remember the best.
|> Loyd Means
|> Phoenix AZ
 Is that because the unusual is usually the best, or because
 the best is usually unusual?  

************************************************************
Johnny Battle                        Staggering parties of
                                     dipsodumb dafodils
From: PCT601%sirius.ukc.ac.uk@VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (Robryche)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Miss Savant and Monty
Date: 9 Apr 1992 06:41:09 -0500
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

But look at it this way. Forget about the first choice anyway. At the second
choice, one goat having been removed, there will be two doors, one with a goat
and one with a car, you will be standing in front of one of them. Since you
dont know what's behind the doors, there's a fifty percent chance that you're
standing in front of the one with the car. Therefore, Whether you switch or
not, there's a fifty percent chance you'll get the one with the car. So to
switch or not to switch is just down to the gambler in you.

Personally, I think it'd be rather cool to go to work on a goat.
Saves heaps on petrol too.

--
Rich

Xref: sparky alt.folklore.urban:11836 misc.kids:12600
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,alt.folklore.science
Subject: Re: Cable TV cheater spotters (was Re: FCC Call letters)
Date: 6 Apr 92 20:33:06 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <22499@dog.ee.lbl.gov> jtchew@csa3.lbl.gov writes:
>A superheterodyne receiver like a TV generates and amplifies 
>its intermediate-frequency (IF) signal all the time regardless 
>of what channel you're on or where the rf input is coming
>from.  The local oscillator (LO) frequency varies depending
>on what channel you're watching, however.  If the cable uses
>a channel on which no one in town broadcasts, and they kept
>picking up the corresponding LO signal from your house, they
>might be able to infer that you were watching the cable.  The
>signal is very weak from an FCC type-accepted TV set, and
>they'd have to have good equipment and skills to figger it out.

Of course, most cable boxes ouput onto channel 3 or 4 - the same
frequency used by VCR's, camcorders, video games, computers, etc.
They'd be hard pressed to make a case.  Especially if you use your
cable-ready VCR as the tuner.

Now it might work if your cable-ready TV set is decoding it directly,
but I really don't think that would be valid evidence anyway.

-- 
David Charlap                   Q:"Where do these stairs go?"
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu          A:"They go up"
----------------------------
Hi! I am a .signature virus. Copy me into your .signature to join in!
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: FURRJK@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu (Joel Furr)
Subject: lsd
Organization: The Ohio State University Department of Computer and Information Science
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 05:55:55 GMT

Ingesting LSD gives you the mindset of a lemur?

Um...

... Yeah.  Good point.  Damned if I know if this is a pro or con.

Opinions?
From: imw@siesoft.co.uk (Ian Wild)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Digits in the Driver's license number
Date: 8 Apr 92 13:37:13 GMT
Organization: Siemens Nixdorf Systems Development Group

moroney@ramblr.enet.dec.com () says:
>Criminals are usually not stupid enough to use their own SSAN.  They'll use
>someone else's or make one up.  I'd rather not get stopped for a traffic
>violation and wind up with the officer's gun at my head because my SSAN
>was used by a dangerous criminal sometime.

You mean you have to give a Social Security number before you're allowed to
commit a crime over there?  Good grief!

Ian
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Wanted: Favorite College/Dorm Practical Jokes
From: derek@fivegl.co.nz (Derek Tearne)
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 92 01:02:59 GMT
Reply-To: derek@fivegl.co.nz (Derek Tearne)
Organization: Task Management Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand

In article <1992Apr3.003246.4480@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com> billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:
>derek@fivegl.co.nz (Derek Tearne) (Me)writes:
>: 
>: One time I discovered how to alter the tumblers in the door locks so that 
>: the owners key no longer opened his door, but everyone elses key on the 
>: floor did. This was not my floor but apparently great fun was had when the 
>: student in question came back from his weekend away. Locking him in, 
>: locking him out, bursting in unannounced, "what do you mean your locks 
>: broken MY key works" etc etc..
>
>A little hard to do unless you made everyone elses key a master-key. That
>is, unless everyone on the floor was on a sub-master system. But then, you
>would have to recut all the other keys to the new submaster cut. It could
>be possible that all the other keys on the floor, except for the victim,
>had a common cut - but unlikely.
>
>Sorry - doesn't wash. And yes, I am a certified master locksmith - among my
>many other dubious talents.
>
The 'flat' ( half a floor ) comprised eight rooms on some form of sub master 
system. I can't remember why the lock needed fixing but I was elected Mr 
Fix-it ( one of my dubious talents ). In the course of this, and having never 
taken one apart before, I dropped a couple of the tumbler bits and got them 
transposed.  The effect of this was that the correct key didn't open the lock 
but some ( Not all ) the other room keys _would_. I eventually got that door 
to work correctly and we tried the same operation on someone elses room with
v. similar effects. Whether it washes or not I actually did it - honest!
Perhaps it was only a fluke that by transposing two tumblers some of the 
other keys also opened the door but thats what happened. I suspect that 
the keys where actually quite similar. 

Derek Tearne
-- 
Derek Tearne      derek@fivegl.co.nz | If yo
  rek      l   .nz                   | yo
New Zea
and while he wasn't looking the .sig eaters were busy at work
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: david.lloyd-jones@rose.uucp (david lloyd-jones)
Subject: Captain Crunch and th
Organization: Rose Media Inc, Toronto, Ontario.
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 10:59:23 GMT
X-Gated-By: Usenet <==> RoseMail Gateway (v1.2)


Date Entered: 04-11-92 07:56
U(>Subject: Re: Captain Crunch and the Phone Phreaks

U(>        The 2600 Hz tone (every self respecting geek knows that.. JUST KIDDI
U(>would allow calls _anywhere_.  Wozniak & Jobs sold Blue Boxes to UC Berkeley
U(>students before starting Apple. [Either they, or someone else, was caught by
U(>the police, and the excuse was that it was a "device to play music" or
U(>somesuch.  The cops said something like "someone beat you to it last week."
U(>Sounds like folklore, but it is told in the _first person_ by Wozniak or one
U(>the other phreakers].


"It isn't 2600 Hz., it's a couple of different tones at once..." Blah
blah blah.

Genuine urban legend: Bell has sent somebody around to all the
University libraries and cut out the article from that issue of the Bell
Technical Journal.

       -d "If I knew it wouldn't be a UL now, would it?" lj.
---
   SLMR 2.0   Nothing is so smiple that it can't get screwed up.
   RM 1.60: Usenet: Rose Media - Hamilton (416) 575-5363
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: chuck_adams@qmail.ssc.gov (Chuck Adams)
Subject: Re: Cable TV cheater spotters (was Re: FCC Call letters)
Organization: Superconducting Super Collider Laboratory
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 15:36:41 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.012622.5172@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com> 
billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:
> : "Radar Jammers" (the ones I saw) were not being sold as "Radar 
Jammers".
> : They were being sold as "Ham Radio Transmitters", for the police shared
> : a Ham Band on a secondary allocation.  If you were a Ham (Technician 
class
> : at least) then the use of the device was legal from the FCC's 
viewpoint.
> 
> Yes and no. The Ham license does not give the right to cause malicious
> interferance with another signal. That is what the Ham would be doing
> and, as such, would be using the device illegally.
> 
> Bill "Working on 20 wpm" Nelson

I always thought they would get you for obstruction of justice.

               Chuck Adams,  WB5WRR   (The Chuckster)
                Internet:  chuck_adams@qmail.ssc.gov
   Disclaimer:  Not an official document of DOE, SSCL, URA or EG&G
                   "Curses!  Flamed Again"  - me
Xref: sparky alt.folklore.urban:12057 alt.mcdonalds:432
From: cglover@lonestar.utsa.edu (Calvin G. Glover)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,alt.mcdonalds
Subject: Re: McMouse!
Date: 10 Apr 92 21:41:06 GMT
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio

In article <1992Apr10.212924.19240@cs.tulane.edu> tcws@convex1.tcs.tulane.edu (Bill Sirinek) writes:
>In article <1992Apr10.090920.13693@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk> gjw@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Mr Garry J. Wardrope) writes:
>>There was a story around here about a school girl who got a Kentucky Fried rat.
>>Story was it had fallen into the batter drum drowned and promptly been fried
>>as a piece oc chicken.  When she bought it she went to the pictures (movies)
>>and sat in the dark munching away.  She did notice it wasn't too good and
>>rather jucier than usual but it wasn't till the lights came up she realised
>>what it was.  So she was rushed off to hospital to have her stomoch (sp)
>>pumped.
>My friend was also the victim of a Kentucky Fried Rat. He wasnt silly enough
>to EAT it... I mean really, looking at it woulda made me lose my appetite
>for a LONG time....
>
    wouldn't these people notice that the rat was not battered like the
    rest of the chicken?  unless the unfortunate rodent was also accidentally
    rolled in milk and flour as well.

    what about the tail?  and the guts and the bones?

    well, i guess that's why it's an ul!

    --calvin--

-- 
    *  "i should not talk so much about myself if there were anybody else  *
    *   whom i knew as well.  Unfortunately, i am confined to this theme   *
    *   by the narrowness of my experience"  -- henry david thoreau        *
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: sysmatt@aix3090b.uky.edu (James M. Simpson)
Subject: Re: Run out of town on a rail
Keywords: eat more cruciferous vegetables for Jesus.
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 08:28:09 GMT
X-Bytes: 

The  expression "run out of town on a rail" is quite literal. People
who had irritated the local townsfolk were placed straddle a rail and
carried out of town, frequently after being tarred and feathered.
Consider that most of the scoundrels who received this treatment were
male, and consider the male anatomy, and consider having that rail
between your legs constantly jostled by the angry mob as they transport
you, and you can understand why one recipient of such treatment was
quoted as saying "If it wasn't for the ceremony of the thing, I would
just as soon have walked"
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Tuesday, 7 Apr 1992 10:26:30 MST
From: <ICLNM@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Fluorescent Pens

In article <1992Apr7.053649.12443@PA.dec.com>, mikkelson@breakr.enet.dec.com
>
>>To their amazement they could see their skeletons outlined in the mirrors,
>>they were so radioactive.
>
>So, none of them had even been in a darkened room prior to this incident?
>Or was the effect magnified when several people were in close proximity to
>each other?
>
How the Hell would I know?  I wasn't there.  I related a story I heard from
a grade school science teacher 40 years ago.  This is AFU, isn't it?

To those of you who had some information to share, thanks.  Apparently I missed
the program(s).
Loyd Means
Phoenix AZ
Xref: sparky alt.folklore.urban:11926 alt.folklore.science:1364