HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jmartin@ntmtv.UUCP (Jeff Martin)
Subject: Re: SuperBowl Champions Philly Eagles
Originator: jmartin@cleomed
Organization: Northern Telecom Incorporated
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 18:41:27 GMT

 rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
 
>{ranting about philly deleted}
 
>yeah, yeah, the bEagles are a great team now, but they are one hard tackle
>on randall cunnigham away from being just a good team, and probably losing
>in the first round of the playoffs.
 
Now don't cut the Eagles short. They have demonstrated on 3 occasions that
they are quite capable of loosing in the first round of the play-offs with 
Mr. Cunnigham at the helm.

Ofcourse it may not be fair to blame Randall completely for all three loses, he was benched
half-way through one of those games.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.)
Subject: Re: Education flames?? (was: Re: Cowboys can kick Bills Butt)
Organization: University of Houston Administrative Computing
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 17:28:04 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20

In <BvHxyp.8tr@acsu.buffalo.edu> v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu writes:

> 
> >Go Oilers Go Cowboys Texas Bowl I coming soon....
> 
> 	In the infamous words of William Hackett, "NOT!"
> > 
> >William Hackett 
> Jonny B.

  Too true, I bet.  The spOilers always find a way to choke when the Big Games
are on the line.  And I like Houston, so I can say that.


semper fi,

Jammer Jim Miller 
Texas A&M University '89 and '91
********************************************************************************
* Speak for my employers?  They don't even know I exist!		       *
*"Become one with the Student Billing System. *BE* the Student Billing System."*
* "Power finds its way to those who take a stand.  Stand up, Ordinary Man."    *
*      ---Rik Emmet, Gil Moore, Mike Levine: Triumph 		               *
********************************************************************************
From: v134junv@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Donald A Martin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Mark Clayton (answer)
Date: 29 Sep 92 06:16:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Sep28.135324.28916@makesys.com>, john@makesys.com (John Turman) writes...
>In article: <6675@transfer.stratus.com>-gene@ok.sw.stratus.com (Eugene Loparco) writes:
> 
>>Does anyone have any news on Mark Clayton?  When is he coming back?  How
>>serious is his injury? etc.
> 
> 
>>-Gene
> 
>According to the Dolphin Digest for last week Mark should be ready and activated for
>the Jills game coming up this week. The Digest suggested that to make room for him
>expect to see Fred Banks cut loose. The news on Reggie Roby isn't as good. It looks
>like he'll be out at least a month.
> 
> 
>John T.
> 
>-- 
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>If you take yourself too seriously, you'll be the only one who does.
> 
>...John "Dolphinatic" Turman...
============================================================================
The dol-foons might as well play the jills, because they are sorry anyways
and will get beat no matter who they play.  Wait til they play a decent
team. 3 and 0...... what a joke!
From: deguc@holein1.Corp.Sun.COM (Bob Deguc)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: John Elway's Comebacks.
Date: 7 Oct 1992 00:00:41 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: deguc@holein1.Corp.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: holein1.corp.sun.com

In article 14300@vexcel.com, jic@vexcel.com (jic account for NAVY) writes:
> 
> Elway 4th Quarter Comebacks against NFC teams:
> 
> 1984 vs. New England
> 1985 vs. Atlanta
> 1985 vs. San Fransisco  *
> 1987 vs. Green Bay
> 1987 vs. Chicago        *
> 1987 vs. New England
> 1988 vs. San Fansisco   *
> 1991 vs. New England
> 1991 vs. Phoenix

I dunno, us Buffalo fans ain't too bright, but isn't New England
in the AFC?????



:^D for the football impaired....



Bob De Guc
Bills fan in *ANY* country.
From: rege@bongo.Berkeley.EDU (Ashutosh G. Rege)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles : YIKES!
Date: 6 Oct 1992 20:42:12 GMT
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: bongo.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Oct6.182036.26934@unet.net.com> asgari@ssc01.unet.com (Asgari Roger) writes:
 >In article <1992Oct6.040326.20855@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com> marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com writes:
 >>Up until tonight, I thought the 49ers were the team to beat in the NFC.
 >>But after watching the Eagles devour the Cowboys tonight (and keeping
 >>in mind the way they demolished the Broncos), it sure looks like the
 >>Eagles are the now the premier team in the NFC. We may find out when
 >>the 49ers and the Eagles meet later this season, and it looks possible
 >>they will meet again in the NFC championship game. Right now, even though
 >>I'm a 49ers fans, I'd say the Eagles have the inside track. But the
 >>49ers are very close, and they certainly have what it takes to beat
 >>the Eagles if they play a halfway decent game.
 > 
 >
 >		With all due respect Bob, Grow up please. I am an avid
 >	Pokes fan but have known for some time(pre-preseason) that the
 >	Eagles are by far the best team(balance wise) in the NFC. 
 >		Perhaps if you played them twice a year you would        
 >	know this.
 >
 >		GO COWBOYS!!!!

  Wow, you must be prescient or really knowledgeable about football,
  maybe they'll hire you in some NFL front office. Most observers 
  in the preseason would have said that the Eagles had several question
  marks : 

  1. A crappy offensive line. Was Antone Davis going to turn out to
     be the bust that everyone was projecting him to be ?
  2. A non-existent running game. Did Herschel Walker really have it 
     in him to play football or was his signing oing to come back to 
     haunt them?
  3. Loss of Jerome Brown ('nuff said).
  4. Randall Cunningham's knee, would it last the season ?
  5. Keith Jackson's holdout. Missing one of the best pass catching
     tight ends is not trivial to handle.

  Nobody doubted that the Eagles were one of the better teams in the
  NFC but to say that you KNEW all along that they were THE BEST in
  the NFL is a wee bit post facto, no? (And the season is only 5 games 
  old, for crying out loud; 4 for the Eagles)

  Right now I'd say the Eagles are the best. They've the best defense
  in the league and an excellent offense. However not all the
  questions have been answered. So let's wait shall we ?

  Ashu Rege
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Go GIANTS!)
Subject: Re: Ten best rated QB performances ever
Organization: Yale University Computing & Information Systems
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 14:09:56 GMT

In article <1992Oct3.000746.28843@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Michael.P.Colburn@dartmouth.edu (Michael P. Colburn) writes:
>From: Michael.P.Colburn@dartmouth.edu (Michael P. Colburn)
>Subject: Re: Ten best rated QB performances ever
>Date: 3 Oct 92 00:07:46 GMT


>  Well, I don't have my NFL stat book handy, but surely every Giant fan
>(and probably most Bronco fans) remember Phil Simms' monster
>performance in the '86 Superbowl.  If memory serves me right, he
>completed all but 3 passes out of 25 attempts for nearly 300 yards!  I
>have no idea what his QB rating was for that game, but I'm sure it's
>got to be one of the best (if not the best) in any playoff/championship
>game and should have a high enough rating to be listed in the top 10
>best performances ever.  Go Gia's!!!

>-MC

OOOOOUUUUUCCCHHHHHHH, In last nights extremely weak performance of the 
Giants, they mentioned this game and I believe the annoucers said 
statistically was the 2nd best game a quaterback ever had in the 
Superbowl.  (My question was who is 1st)

P.S. Is there an orothodontist on this list who can surgically widen my 
mouth so its easier to JAM MY FOOT IN IT!

Adriene L. Nazaretian        
Yale University              
ADRIENE@YALEADS.BITNET        
ADRIENE@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU
From: mark@totaltec.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles schedule
Date: 28 Sep 92 14:00:59 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Total Tec Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Sep26.075604.1958@nctams1.uucp>, 00h@pnet16.cts.com (Rmc{Sw} Brooks) writes:
> Looking at Philly's schedule , they could lose four out of the next five!
> Boy would it be quiet on this bbs then.

For your information this is NOT a bbs, and I doubt the Eagles would loose
4 out of their next 5.

GO EAGLES!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: seth@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (peter.r.clark..jr)
Subject: brief Eagles/Cowboys postmortem
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 18:52:44 GMT


Well, I felt I started some intelligent conversation about THE GAME
beforehand, so now I'll gloat a little (really, just a litte).

I said that the EAGLES front 7 would neutralize Emmitt, and they did.
(small chuckle at the woofing twits)

I said that Eric Allen would neutralize Irvin, had to clarify that a
little later, and I feel very much that he did. Take away that one catch,
which was a great showing of concentration, and Irvin was a non-factor.
(another small chuckle at the woofing twits)

I asked if Dallas had any other offensive weapons, and the answer from
the Cowboys fans who gave responses worth reading was that Harper was
good but not great. I said later that Novacek was the person who worried
me the most. Novacek was, IMHO, the biggest problem the EAGLES had,
and could have kept Dallas in it much longer if he hadn't started dropping
balls left and right. That may be were the game was really won. Novacek
was open a lot, and that was not exploited enough, mostly due to dropped
or bad passes.

On the other side of the Ball, the EAGLES offense was as good as they had
to be, again. No more, no less. Hear that? The cricket's chirping? That's
all the Herschel critics being real quiet all of a sudden. No, he didn't
gain 100 yards. Didn't have to. When the EAGLES needed to just run out
the clock in the 4th quarter, there was Herschel getting first downs and
setting up TD's for himself and Byars.
(small, more sinister chuckle for the Herschel critics)

Randall was not the leagues best passer this Monday night, but he didn't
have to be. When Dallas gave the EAGLES an opportunity Randall and Co.
cashed in. That's all that really matters.

Last point. Special teams. Feagles had a career day punting for the birds.
Ruzek was simply solid. First, the kick that didn't count went straight
down the middle, and the one that did followed like a Robin Hood arrow
splitting the one that came before it. BUT, to Dallas' credit there were
some good returns that could have hurt the EAGLES (which Dallas didn't
take advantage of), and Ruzek's kickoffs were nothing to write home about.

Really, Dallas was kept in this game by an uncalled Dallas fumble at their
own 10 followed by that great catch by Irvin. Take that away, and think
about how the game would have turned out. Not a pretty sight, eh?

pete clark jr.
From: gt6390a@prism.gatech.EDU (BERNSTEIN,AVRON P)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Andre Rison
Keywords: whiner!
Date: 2 Oct 92 23:13:56 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


Just my luck that after my posting, Rison goes out and has the game if his LIFE!
About the money issue.  I believe that once they sign a contract, they should 
honor its terms.  BOTH the owner AND player are legally and morally bound to
honor a contract that both to in good faith.  When a player who HAS AN EXISTING
contract, NOT just finished one up and is unsigned, but IS SIGNED already,
starts whining and complaining, hey look, tough luck, use it as a bargaining
chip when your current contract runs out.  Rison was already signed, and cried
that he wasn't getting paid what he was worth.  Yes, players take huge risks
with regard to permanent injury.  But does that mean that $14 million over five
years CAN repair a spinal cord, but that $13 million over six years CAN'T.
I most certainly DO NOT want to see ANY player injured, but the argument that
$7 million CAN compensate in that event, but $3 million just won't cut it, is
somewhat insulting to those who have REAL jobs and risk permanent injury.
There are real jobs that risk dismemberment or permanent injury, and there are
at least a few of these people that will never see $1 million in their lifetimes
much less $9 mil plus a $1.5 million signing bonus, etc.  The owners are as
money-grubbing as they come.  Bogus payments like Braman's $7 million "salary"
reek of the old "two books" bookkeeping system.  You know, the red one is the
real one, but the blue one is the one the government sees, etc.  I have no doubt
that the owners if allowed to would pay the players $4.50/hour (only game time
would count too, not total elapsed time), and charge the fans $100 a ticket
if they could get away with it.  The people that ALWAYS suffer are the fans.
When there is a strike, holdout, disputes, lawsuits, increasing salaries, etc,
the fans always foot the bills.  Look at Phoenix, where the area was STARVING
for pro football.  Too bad they lured Bill Bidwell's team.  They got one of 
worst owners.  He's up there with Irsay, Culverhouse, and Smith.  My point
in my original posting, whether or not I did a decent job at conveying it
is another thing, is simply that the players and owners should both realize that
it is the fans who make sports what they are.  Without fans, the would be NO
PROFESSIONAL SPORTS of any kind.  The fans play the salaries, pay the owners,
buy the tickets, buy the merchandise, watch the tv, pay the advertisers of the
products, buy the concessions, etc.
-- 
BERNSTEIN,AVRON P
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt6390a
Internet: gt6390a@prism.gatech.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Mark Clayton
From: slp@vax1.mankato.msus.edu
Date: 3 Oct 92 17:06:56 -0600
Organization: Mankato State University

In article <1687414C10.UC516349@mizzou1.missouri.edu>, UC516349@mizzou1.missouri.edu (The Pseudo Edge) writes:
>   Will he be activated for this sunday's game?
> I would like to know because I would like to start him
> this week.
> Thanx,
>  
> Wayne

Last I hear Clayton will in Sunday's game. I do not think he is the starter. 
Probably has to re-earn it.
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Date: Thursday, 1 Oct 1992 12:27:10 PST
From: <TOM@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Is Rodney Peete playing?

Does anyone know if Rodney Peete is the starting QB against the Saints this
week?  I know he has a foot injury which may make a big difference in the
run and shoot.  I believe the line is even and Sanders can't do it all, at
least not against the Saints front line.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: qsnow@lonestar.utsa.edu (Quentin . Snow)
Subject: Re: EAGLES
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:36:01 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.184212.11932@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> aperkins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Aaron B. Perkins) writes:
>        EAGLES WILL WIN THE SUPERBOWL AND I WILL BET ANYONE HERE ANYTHING ON
>        ONHE PICK THAT THEY MUST MATCH ME OK????????!!!!!!
>

So ... Are you going to change your philosphy on this when the Cowboys
beat the Eagles the comming Monday.?? Dallas will then be leading the pack
at 4 and 0!
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: 1972 Dolphins
Date: 28 Sep 92 22:12:16 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


NOPE. Jim Kiick definitely didn't have a 1000 yard year in 1972.  It
was just Csonka and Morris.  Personally, I always thought it was the
greed of Kiick and Csonka (leaving for a much higher contract) which
destroyed this dynasty.  But then again, they did loose that all important
playoff game in 1974 (Csonka and Kiick's last year) to the Raiders who
then lost to the Pittsburgh Steelers ... hence, the new dynasty.

satish nair
GIANT FAN (no dynasty here ...)

The Steelers must have had the SINGLE BEST DRAFT of ALL TIME in 1974
getting Stallworth, Swann, Lambert, etc. etc. etc. that year.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Dolphins Eat the Bills for Lunch...
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 92 22:28:47 GMT
Organization: VMark Software, Inc.

Yes folks.. all those non-believers out there, the Dolphins are for real!!!!
They kicked the Bills butts 37-10.  Though the score is pretty lop-sided,
the game was much closer than that.  The Dolphins seemed to move the ball
at will againt the Bills due to a couple of key things.  One, Keith Jackson
was a MAJOR impact player today.  His signing made a world of difference, 
as he caught a couple of important passes, one going in for an incredible 
touchdown.  Another difference was the offensive line. The Fins' line stopped
Bruce Smith cold again, and pretty much dominated the Bills throughout.  
I don't think Marino had serious pressure except for a couple of occasions.
Thirdly, the Dolphins running game was doing pretty well as Humphrey and
Higgs were effective.  The Bills would stop them for a loss on a number of
occassions, but they came up with the big yardage when necessary.  And, 
finally, Marino was awesome.  3 touchdowns and 1 non-interception (final
play of the 1st half heave hail mary...  shouldn't really count).  On defense,
the Fins played a "hybrid" defense that really confused the Bills.  They were
able to move pretty easily, but if they made a mistake, the Fins capitalized
on it.  Louis Oliver was great, picking off 3 passes, taking 1 103!!!! yards
for the touchdown, and the other two for about 40 yards or more.  I think he
actually led all Bills receivers in yardage :-) The Fin's had a number of
sacks, most coming later in the game.

All in all, a great win for the 'Fins.  The major difference in this game
was turnovers, as the Bills had, I think, 4 interceptions and 1 fumble.

And, to all those Bills fans thinking otherwise...

Phhchhhhthhththth..

-- 
David T. Meeks                    ||" We are jigsaw pieces, aligned on the 
VMark Software, Inc.              ||  perimeter edge, 
uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  interlocked through a missing piece"
davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||" ...This world is totally Fugazi"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Packer predictions (Re: IRON CURTAIN)
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date: 28 SEP 92 13:08:19    

In article <1a7claINNq08@uwm.edu>, paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger) writes...

>        All I can remember is JGH's Super Bowl prediction for the Packers.
>	Is he a prophet or what??!!

Last spring I also predict the Packers would go 16-0 and win the SB 
something like 98-0.  Guess we'll have to revise that one a little.

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Packer news
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date: 30 SEP 92 15:19:04    

The Packers have placed James Campen on IR.  They signed former 49er 
center named something Neville.  I missed the first name.

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dostalik@epcot.spdc.ti.com (Bill Dostalik)
Subject: Re: Dangerous Dan
Organization: TI Semiconductor Process and Design Center
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 20:17:45 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.173855.27014@gmuvax2.gmu.edu> asagar@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Ashish Sagar) writes:
>>Article 28145 of rec.sport.football.pro:
>>Although I am Canadian and have watch Warren Moon play for the Eskimos
>>there is no doubt in my mind that Dan Marino is by far the premiere
>>QB in NFL no matter how many records Moon will brake.
>
>
>Wheather Dan breaks records or Moon does, whats the point unless they
>can carry their team to the Super Bowl and win it.  Thats where
>QBs like Montana and Kelly(though not won a super bowl but taken the
                      ^^^^^^       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Note that Marino *has* taken his team their twice also, but lost to
the 49's and Redskins.  So, if Kelly is a premier QB, Marino is
too.  In fact, Marino did it with a surrounding cast arguably weaker
than Kelly's making the feat even more impressive.  Marino is the
best passer of the modern era.

>bills twice there) outshine and stand way above Qbs only breaking
>records.  These are the QBs that one can say are premiere QBs and
>dangerous Qbs. 
>
>Ashish 

    OOOO      
   O    O     =================================== |       Bill Dostalik
   O  U O  U          Oklahoma Sooners            |   dostalik@utdallas.edu
   O  U O  U  National College Football Champions |     Dept. of Physics    
    OOOO   U     1950 1955 1956 1974 1975 1985    | Univ. of Oklahoma @ Dallas
      U    U  =================================== | 
       UUUU                                       |   "Oh, yeah?"  "Yeah."
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: NINERS WIN!!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 22:55:44 GMT

In article <1992Oct02.080224.10416@bnr.ca> mccray@crchh496.BNR.CA (Dale McCray) writes:
>In article <1992Oct1.081620.12045@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM
>(John P. Gloria) writes:
>|>
>|>I'll bet you don't have the HUEVOS to call me a fairy-whiner to
>|>my face, whereas I have what it takes to refer to you as a PUTO or 
>                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^                            
>What it takes? Lemme take a wild guess. Is it being able to look at
>yourself in the mirror and say "I may be an insufferable, obnoxious
>jerk, but by golly, I like myself."  Isn't that special?
>

NO, wrong penis breath! :-) If the truth be known, (hey you brought it up,)
when I look in the mirror, I usually say to myself, "Damn, I look good!" I
go to work and almost everyday a lady will confirm my observations. :-)
What do you observe in the mirror besides pimples?
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "Fact are facts and will not disappear on account of 
   your likes."  -   Jawaharlal Nehru
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: NFL_1992 Scoreboard: Predictions for Week 6
Date: 6 Oct 92 08:23:27 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

Here are the computer program's predictions for Week 6.
===



        
                     Week #6 Game Predictions


       Seattle        ___   17          L.A. Rams      ___   10

     @ Dallas         ___   22        @ New Orleans    ___   23



       Phoenix        ___   19          Denver         ___   16

     @ N.Y. Giants    ___   26        @ Washington     ___   25



       Houston        ___   31          Pittsburgh     ___   20

     @ Cincinnati     ___   18        @ Cleveland      ___   16



       N.Y. Jets      ___   21          Philadelphia   ___   22

     @ Indianapolis   ___   15        @ Kansas City    ___   19



       Buffalo        ___   32          Atlanta        ___   26

     @ L.A. Raiders   ___   20        @ Miami          ___   28


       San Francisco  ___   34

     @ New England    ___   10
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: st1ge@Elroy.UH.EDU (Edward Hui)
Subject: Dexter Carter
Reply-To: st1ge@Elroy.UH.EDU
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 13:59:41 GMT

     A newspaper here in Houston reported that the Oilers are interested
in obtaining Dexter Carter from the Niners.  They want to play him as a
slot receiver in the run & shoot.  It would be nice for the 49ers to get
rid of Carter since he will no doubt lose a lot of playing times to
Watters and Lee.  Any news from Niners fans out in the Bay Area?

Edward Hui