HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v128juxa@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (SCHUYJUANNAH)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: rabbit
Date: 7 Nov 92 16:48:00 GMT
Organization: SUNY@Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <BxB2A5.HC4@umassd.edu>, s14255ss@UMASSD.EDU writes...
>"Bunny Excretion Moisturizing Cream"  Available in shaved or unshaved!  
>Will  trade for 57 kilos of lemming intestines or one can of spam.
I'd like some. Will you accept Nellie's snuggly dustbunnies? 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
From: ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (T.F. Eccles)
Subject: Re: Chemistry (was Re: physics humor)
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 06:35:21 GMT

goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
[toooo big to keep]

>> 
>no, I'm not up a mountain. I'm rather down-to-earth. Now that you
>displayed a chemical knowledge of a woman, can you give a physical
>description? Of me? No? Well, then, why don't you invite me down to
>your lab and I can educate you in the properties of a really dangerous
>and extremely enduring specimen of a beautiful female that makes all
>the others turn green?

I don't want you turning mine green. That would be silly.
Besides, i'm quite happy with this one.

Eccles aka Keeps his out of the sun so she doesn't go spotty.
From: wc8384@writer.yorku.ca (Siusan Moffat)
Subject: Re: bookshop question
Summary: bookshop answer
Organization: Computer Assisted Writing Centre, York University, Toronto, Canada
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 19:15:35 GMT

In article <1992Nov3.063637.6944@samba.oit.unc.edu> Jeffrey.Hale@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Jeffrey Hale) writes:
>Final Rip-Off, no longer in my possession due to a dastardly former roommate,
>had a sketch about a nightmare customer in a bookshop (Jones and Cleese, I
>think).  Where did this first appear, and did they ever perform it live? 
>I assume this wasn't circus, b/c I couldn't locate it in All the Words.
>
>thnx
>
>jgh

Actually, this sketch first appeared on mp's contractual obligation
album. it was all new stuff. i've never seen them perform it and it's
not in all the words. For anyone who reads this - i'm doing a mp
fanzine to come out after x-mas. if you have any rantings and such
write me a line. i haven't figured out how to use this thing yet so if
you can just let me know you wannna write something. ps. i don't think
it was jones who was the amazingly annoying customer. i have a feeling
it was that bald guy (name unknown but he resembles and speaks like
marty feldman) who also appeared in (at least) Life of brian.

gwen dibly
wc8384@writers.york u.ca
From: goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: Sex sells...
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:25:13 GMT
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <1992Nov9.175821.16420@nevada.edu>, dalton@nevada.edu (William Turlough Cat) writes:
> In article <1992Nov9.073138.7427@tamsun.tamu.edu> hnb5164@tamuts.tamu.edu (Heather Noel Bobbie) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov9.041239.28926@nevada.edu> dalton@nevada.edu (William Turlough Cat) writes:
>>>In article <1992Nov9.022203.13267@tamsun.tamu.edu> hnb5164@tamuts.tamu.edu (Heather Noel Bobbie) writes:
>>>>In article <1992Nov7.122041.3770@wkuvx1.bitnet> goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
>>>>>In article <1992Nov7.001054.7581@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, hschmidt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Heidi E Schmidt) writes:
> [stuff rmd for no apparent reason :>>]
>>>>gina, sweetie your flirting is out of control; you are flirting
>>>>with women now...care to flirt with me?
>>>                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>           Sure...   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>ooh, let's make it a threesome, shall we?  menages a trois are so much
>>fun...
> ookey.
>>
>>>>>And they want a hard-core sleazefest. What's wrong with the soft-core?
>>>>>What's our country up to these days?
>>>Nothing good.  Although we're almost out of the rut.  Just a few more years...
>>gleep.  i hope so...or i'm moving (i'll come stay with you, sprooney,
>>ok?  and remind me to discipline you for flirting with everyone under
>>the sun...)
> Okay.  Discipline me for flirting with Everyone Under The Sun  (although I
> don't even think I've metter yet.).
>>
>>>>family values.
>>>>hardcore, softcore, both can be good if you've got the stuff.
>>>yes...  (nods)
>>but you gotta know what you're doing..as well i do.
>>learn from an expert!  leather, the sleazy redhead who does
>>hard and soft equally well! (but who prefers hard and is very good
>>at making the soft hard..)
> I would think so.  Redheads are especially good at that sort of thing.  Alas,
> the last one I knew left several years ago.  Oh well... (grins and looks
> hopefully at leather)
>>
>>>>which i don't doubt you do.
>>>>
>>>>leather aka a peaceful soul...honest.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>William Turlough Cat aka beiad
>>
>>
> 
> William Turlough Cat aka beiad
Don't let het stroke your fur the wrong way, kitty. I'll make sure oyu
get rubbed the *tight* way. Not too hard, but firmly. Until you get so
relaxed you go stiff again. And did I mention that I happen to have
the most experienced hands in this contest anyway?
Just ask Fievel. or RAtboy. Or Daniel after tonight........
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: schenn@mars.lerc.nasa.gov (Lisa Henn)
Subject: Ted Krueger's Legacy (Was Willie Horton and Bush)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Distribution: usa
Date:  5 Nov 1992 14:52 EDT  

In article <Bx94ot.212@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Matt Hucke) writes...
>In article <1992Nov4.042950.2105@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:

>>Name one, asshole!

>Sore loser, eh?

>If asked to "name one asshole", I think I'd have to say "Ted Krueger".

Yes, but Ted Krueger's a _professional_ asshole.  I don't know how much news 
you read, but he goes around from group to group stirring up trouble.  I'm 
really curious to know what he does for a living, for it must be a very nice
job where they pay him to sit, read, and post to all these newsgroups all
the time.  He's also a thorough pro--you must not have noticed all the cross-
posts he made; I edited about 5 groups out of the Newsgroups: line  
(alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics, something.guns, etc)

L
schenn@mars.lerc.nasa.gov
-------------------------
Disclaimer:  My employer has no opinion on Ted Krueger, newsgroups, cross-
             posting, or Dan Quayle (although they do have an opinion 
             about breathing on Mars!)
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Complete this sentence
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 00:16:52 CST
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

ronnie@cisco.com (Ronnie B. Kon) writes:

> My bet for '96: Quayle/Kassenbaum.  Not willing to bet too much on the VP
> selection, but I'm willing to bet a fair amount that Our Man Dan will be
> the nominee.  He's spent four years doing favors for Republicans all over
> the country, and they all owe him.  Also, his concession speech will be
> remembered as extremely gracious and poised.
>
> At least we'll have him back for a few months in '96 (and god forbid any
> longer).
>

Your idea for a ticket has merit.  Unfortunately, it assumes that Quayle and
the more moderate factions of the GOP can wrest control of the party from the
Radical Religious Right.  Of course, we can always start up
alt.fan.radical.reilgious.right if they maintain control or form their own
political party...



|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: What? Bill Clinton plays golf?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 21:43:23 CST
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:

> I can't believe what I saw on TV the other night - Bill Clinton playing
> golf? From what I read on this newsgroup I thought that golf was the
> province only of rich Republicans who lorded it over their poorer
> brethren. Amazing, after 4 years of hearing liberals attack Quayle for
> playing golf at country clubs, here we have Clinton playing golf at
> a country club. Well, will wonders never cease!
> --
> John Switzer               | Impeach Clinton!
>                            | Support the coup!
> CompuServe: 74076,1250     |
> Internet: jrs@netcom.com   |

What's so wonderous about this?  Clinton is a golfer, and caught a lot of crap
early on in the campaign about playing at an all-white country club in Little
Rock.

Maybe you were off the planet on business during the primary season?




|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sstarr@nyx.cs.du.edu (Scott Starr)
Subject: Re: All I have to say
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 18:35:18 GMT

rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:

>In article <1992Nov5.171344.10361@utkux1.utk.edu> rdosser@UTKUX1.UTK.EDU
(rdosser) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov4.151216.15826@rock.concert.net> toddwall@rock.conce
t.net (R. Todd Wall -- Catholic Diocese of Raleigh -- Computer Services) 
rites:
>>>All I have to say is I'll be voting for Quayle in '96.  Hopefully, Cli
ton
>>>won't destroy the economy to bad until then.
>>>
>>
>>Gosh, it sure would be nice if Quayle was the GOP nominee in '96.
>>Without incumbency on his side, I doubt he'd even take Indiana. 
>>
>As long as the the Western branches of Pravda are controlling the U.S.
>mass media, you're right, he won't stand a chance.  Unfortunately.  

>As to Clinton's likliness of destroying the economy: in the unusual even

>that he doesn't accomplish this on his own, I'm sure that Gorey Al and
>Herr Hillary will help him to do so, as will some of his other advisors
>and those friends of his, who have hidden in the background, such as
>the Rev. Jessie "Ah hates dem whities" Jackson, Mario Coomo (as the
>"Rev." Jackson pronounces it), Bella "Let's outlaw religion" Abzug, 
>Anita "Ah slept everywhere" Hill, and Sen. Ted "Dunk her in the water"
>Kennedy, and the rest of the Tax and Spend, lets Leave America Defensele
s
>crowd.




>-- 
>Robert D. Davis            |  VAX/VMS is a text-only adventure game.  If
      
>rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu  !  you win, you get to use UNIX.  If you fail
 
>uunet!mystica!rdd          |  you get to use an IBM-PC running MeSsy-DOS
>Telephone: 1-410-744-7964  !  with MeSsy-Windows or an Apple Macintosh. 

Joke, right?  This is humor, isn't it?  Well, what I'm really trying to
say is:  you don't really THINK this way, do you?

Did anyone ever tell you that your views are possibly a wee bit to the
right of Otto Von Bismark?

And not that you really care, but I think portraying Jessie Jackson as
some sort of silly, steriotypical "coon" figure is remarkably tasteless. 
Really, it doesn't even rise to the level of cheap humor.  Not even to th

level of the 1992 Republican Party Platform.

By the way, doesn't it piss you off that even Buckley and Safire hate
george bush?

Still, keep those chuckles coming!  Andrew Dice Clay went pretty far too!

(I just wonder where all the homosexual jokes are...?  C'mon!  Gay bash! 
We know you cant resist it!!  Remember James -a black two women a jew and
a cripple - Watt?  Those were the days...)



Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Subject: Re: V.P. Marilyn Quayle 1996
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 21:19:43 GMT
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <1992Nov6.130244.1@woods.ulowell.edu> enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
>You heard it here first on January 20 1997 Quayle will again be Vice President.
>Marylin that is.  Because Kemp Quayle is going to win by a huge LANDSLIDE a
>real one not ths paltry 42% victory that Comrade Clinton received.
>
>Kemp -Quayle '96.
>
>Robert R. Eno a conservative voice i Liberal Massachusetts

    Your skills at writing are about as good as your skills at thinking you
don't use much punctuation do you dream on if you think Marylin Quayle has
a future in politics.

-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ.
From: mrichey@mothra.nts.uci.edu (Mike Richey)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: SAM.ZIP
Date: 6 Nov 92 19:53:22 GMT
Organization: University of California, Irvine

In article <N2kPTB4w165w@Blue.Kludge.COM> alizard@Blue.Kludge.COM (A.Lizard) writes:
>It's available from compuserve and america-on-line, it's about a quarter
>meg, and it's a US budget simulator... you can play the balance the
>budget game yourself... if's freeware... 
>
>A.Lizard
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>A.Lizard Internet Addresses:
>alizard%tweekco%boo@PacBell.COM        (preferred)
>[path]!pacbell.COM!boo!tweekco!alizard (bang path for above)
>alizard@seer.mystic.com (backup)   alizard@Blue.Kludge.com (backup)


Anyone know where this can be ftp'd from?
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cah@tyr.JPL.NASA.gov (Allen Halsell)
Subject: Re: V.P. Marilyn Quayle 1996
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA/Caltech
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:59:25 GMT

In article <PJ4yTB8w165w@Blue.Kludge.COM>, alizard@Blue.Kludge.COM (A.Lizard) writes:
> enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
> 
> > You heard it here first on January 20 1997 Quayle will again be Vice Presiden
> > Marylin that is.  Because Kemp Quayle is going to win by a huge LANDSLIDE a
> > real one not ths paltry 42% victory that Comrade Clinton received.
> > 
> > Kemp -Quayle '96.
> > 
> > Robert R. Eno a conservative voice i Liberal Massachusetts
> 
> I think you should stop inhaling. Anything.

No kidding.  I mean, Marilyn has been a pretty nothing VP for the past
4 years ... just bouncing around and making off-the-wall comments.
She looked good on paper in '88: young, good-looking, conservative,
but she hasn't worked out.  And that bonehead husband of hers, the
Second Gentleman (I love that phrase!), what's his name?  Don?  He
seems to be just as bad.  I can't tell if he has any neurons
whatsoever.

PS: are you related to Brian?

*********************************************************************
the only thing that speaks the truth is the eloquence of passing time
               the spoken word is a jacket too tight
From: sham@cs.arizona.edu (Shamim Zvonko Mohamed)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: YOU MAKE THE CALL
Date: 6 Nov 92 18:03:40 GMT
Reply-To: shamim@cs.arizona.edu
Organization: U of Arizona, CS Dept, Tucson

In article <1ddihjINNkur@agate.berkeley.edu>, mazzarel@spam.berkeley.edu (Ariel Mazzarelli) writes:
}When Bush comes on,  he announces that,  should the electoral college vote
}against him,  he will resign the office immediately.
}
}You know what that means.
}
}Four more years of Bush,  or six weeks of Dan.

It's long been one of my fantasies that Bush loses the election and resigns or
kills himself (pick one). And then, Dan can go out not with a whimper, but a
truly befitting bang. That would be such a nice Christmas present...

Well, the first part has come true. How about it, George? Let the poor guy
have some fun!

-s
-- 
  Shamim Mohamed / {uunet,noao,cmcl2..}!arizona!shamim / shamim@cs.arizona.edu

  "Take this cross and garlic; here's a Mezuzah if he's Jewish; a page of the
    Koran if he's a Muslim; and if he's a Zen Buddhist, you're on your own."
 Member of the League for Programming Freedom - write to league@prep.ai.mit.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Subject: Re: Washington Times, 11-9-92
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Distribution: na
Date: 11 Nov 92 16:57:21 GMT

In article <D2150056.ibhtau@erics.infoserv.com> erics@infoserv.com writes:
>
>chall@eco.twg.com (Charles Don Hall) writes:
>
>> [You might think that the man who served as VP to a failed president
>> wouldn't have much chance of winning the nomination just one term
>> later, but that didn't stop Walter Mondale in 1984...]
>
>Yeah, and look how well he did!
>
>By the way, remember who Ford's running mate was in '76? He might have
>a shot at it too.
>
But Dole is getting kinda old, is he?  they are going to try
the babyboomer generation rather than another WWII veteran almost
for certain.  

>-----
>Eric Smith
>erics@infoserv.com
>CI$: 70262,3610
>
>
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: 1996 GOP Veep Choice (Was: Re: Complete this sentence)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 08:32:47 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
Distribution: world
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


ronnie@cisco.com (Ronnie B. Kon) writes:

> My bet for '96: Quayle/Kassenbaum.  Not willing to bet too much on the VP
> selection, but I'm willing to bet a fair amount that Our Man Dan will be
> the nominee.

If we're going to be serious (and, after all, why should we be?), no
matter who the Repubs run for the top spot, there's only one obvious
choice for Veep: Colin Powell. A chance to grab some of the black and
minority vote, keep the anti-gay right wingers, and relive the glorious
days of Desert Storm, all in one package.

And if the GOP doesn't pick him, Perot will.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Washington Times, 11-9-92
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 20:10:18 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
Distribution: na
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


chall@eco.twg.com (Charles Don Hall) writes:

> [You might think that the man who served as VP to a failed president
> wouldn't have much chance of winning the nomination just one term
> later, but that didn't stop Walter Mondale in 1984...]

Yeah, and look how well he did!

By the way, remember who Ford's running mate was in '76? He might have
a shot at it too.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610


Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6661 alt.politics.bush:13811
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
From: liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Subject: Re: 1996 GOP Veep Choice (Was: Re: Complete this sentence)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Date: 12 Nov 92 15:47:45 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.225808.4541@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> cah@tyr.JPL.NASA.gov (Allen Halsell) writes:
>In article <1992Nov11.190041.6137@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>, gsmith@clio.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith) writes:
>> In article <D2150056.ia91fg@erics.infoserv.com> erics@infoserv.com
>> writes:
>> 
>> >If we're going to be serious (and, after all, why should we be?), no
>> >matter who the Repubs run for the top spot, there's only one obvious
>> >choice for Veep: Colin Powell.
>> 
>> If we're going to be serious, shouldn't we admit that Danny boy isn't
>> going to be on the top of any ticket ever?
>
>SERIOUS is one thing we certainly aren't.
>
>As a second point, wasn't Powell born in Jamaica?  I could be wrong,
his parents are from Jamaica, General Powell was born & raised
in Bronx.  

>but if so this would certainly disqualify him from the Presidency
>(and therefore the Veep-ship).
>
>*********************************************************************
>the only thing that speaks the truth is the eloquence of passing time
>               the spoken word is a jacket too tight
From: sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Transition Team Members Wanted
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 92 09:41:26 EST
Organization: Monsoon Software, Inc.

rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:

> Lets hope that something does :-) ...before he can do any more damage to this
> nation!  He's already written a book about the environment that is full of
> lies and liberal-environmentalist propaganda.  There is one good use for his
> book, however, which was proven on the Rush Limbaugh TV show: use the pages
> in it to paper-train puppies.  Dogs are smart, they instinctively know what
> to do with Al Gore's book.  Other dogs like to rip it to shreds.  

Boy, Hopkins really must be letting down their standards since my days
there if the above passes for rational thought.

> Too bad that the U.S. political system failed and allowed Slick Willie & Al
> to become elected, after all, in the the popular vote, not the electoral
> vote, President Bush and VP Quayle WON this election!  However, the

It must be opposite day in the universe you inhabit. In mine, 
Bush/Quayle garnered 38% of the popular vote compared to 43% for
Clinton/Gore. The electoral vote split something line 370 to 186.

Sunil Gupta
Monsoon Software, Inc.
sg@monsoon.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske)
Subject: Re: All I have to say
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 15:02:07 GMT

rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:

>As long as the the Western branches of Pravda are controlling the U.S.
>mass media, you're right, he won't stand a chance.  Unfortunately.  

>As to Clinton's likliness of destroying the economy: in the unusual event
>that he doesn't accomplish this on his own, I'm sure that Gorey Al and
>Herr Hillary will help him to do so, as will some of his other advisors
>and those friends of his, who have hidden in the background, such as
>the Rev. Jessie "Ah hates dem whities" Jackson, Mario Coomo (as the
>"Rev." Jackson pronounces it), Bella "Let's outlaw religion" Abzug, 
>Anita "Ah slept everywhere" Hill, and Sen. Ted "Dunk her in the water"
>Kennedy, and the rest of the Tax and Spend, lets Leave America Defenseless
>crowd.

Ha Ha Ha He He He Ho Ho ...this stuff is great satire.  Really good send
up of a stark raving mad, foaming at the mouth, Republican (my apologies
to sane Republicans) sore loser.  What...this isn't satire?  Gulp.

p.s. Seek some counseling
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Aren't we forgetting something?
Date: 6 Nov 92 16:06:11 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department

Kurt Ludwick writes:

>In article <1d817kINNlcc@agate.berkeley.edu>, mazzarel@spam.berkeley.edu (Ariel
>Mazzarelli) says:

>>Well tonight sure was sweet.  We even survived an early scare here in
>>California,  where in fact Herschensohn has yet to concede defeat.  In just
>>about every other respect,  a sweet election night.

>Don't you find that odd?  CLINTON wins by a landslide in California, but
>Boxer just BARELY beats Herschensohn, a -real- conservative, for Senate?
>I'd worry, if I were you.  I think the attitude is more anti-Bush than
>pro-liberalism.

On the other hand, Herschensohn, a -real- conservative, can't even beat
a Wild-Eyed Liberal (TM) long-term incumbent congresswoman with a big
check-bouncing problem.  I guess it's all a matter of perspective.

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle