HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v116r8ac@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Chris Nasipak)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: O'Brian's Rank
Date: 8 Oct 92 19:52:00 GMT
Organization: United Nations Intelligence Taskforce
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


Wasn't there an episode where O'Brian refers to another officer (either an
ensign or a lt.) as "One of my technicians"?

I think that pretty much clears it up - He has to outrank the technician...



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you really feel like   |         Not Croaker           |
arguing with a can of     |                               |  "Why Me?"
deoderant that registers  | v116r8ac@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu |
nine on the Richter Scale?|   nasipak@acsu.buffalo.edu    | --- Belgarath
        --- Ace           |                               |       the Sorceror
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer - If SUNY wants my opinions, they'll pay through the nose for 'em!
From: ech002@acad.drake.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: RE: ST:TNG movie ???
Date: 9 Oct 92 20:29:27 GMT
Article-I.D.: acad.1992Oct9.142927.1
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA

In article <1992Oct4.233747.7953@ac.dal.ca>, davidhe@ac.dal.ca writes:
> In article <04OCT92.22386589.0089@VM1.MCGILL.CA>, CXMP@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA (CXMP) 
> writes:
>> In article <67059@cup.portal.com> shigsch@cup.portal.com (Shirley Gillard 
> Schneckloth) writes:
>>> As much as I enjoy Patrick Stewart as Captain Picard, I would prefer
>>>if he were 'premoted'o to admiral, left the show and came back for a few guest
>>>appearances.
>>> If Will Riker were then made captain, who do you think would be his
>>>first officer? If Data were promoted, who would replace him as Chief Operation
>>>Officer? Worf -- who would be Chief of Security? Geordi -- who would be Cheif
>>>Engineer?
>> 
>> Seeing as how Spock was First Officer and Science Officer, why can't
>> Data be both First Officer and Chief Operating Officer?
>> 
> 
> 
> 	

  There is very good reason why he can not.  First, the Ops manager is an
entirely differnt job from the first officer.  The Ops manager is in charge of
coordinating research groups aboard the ship, delegating who gets to use the
sensor arrays and when they get to use them, coordinating activites with
engineering when needed, and many other things.
	The second officer is just that second in command.  He heads up away
teams, handles personel problems, takes command in captains absence, and other
command duties.
	Though Data could possibly handle them all mentally and perhaps even
physically, it would be impractical for him to maintain both jobs.  It would be
impractical say if he had to coordinate a sensor sweep of a planet(Ops manager)
and lead an away team on a neighboring moon(first officer).  
	So you can see that with the advances in technology and use of personel
the Enterprise-D, is far superior to the old Enterprise.
From: 91babik@gw.wmich.edu (Lisamarie Gemma Babik)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Locutus entymology
Date: 14 Oct 92 00:04:02 EST
Followup-To: mlvanbie@descartes.uwaterloo.ca
Organization: Western Michigan University

Hmmm...when I heard his name I instantly thought of the word "elocution" or 
"locution."  If you look them up (never mind, I already did!) you can see 
that locution has the following meanings: a particular form of expression, 
a word of expression charateristic of a region, group, or cultural level, 
or a style of discourse.  And elocution is the art of effective public 
speaking, or a style of speaking.  Consider that they nabbed Picard to use
him as a front-man, I think Locutus was a really good name for him.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Lisamarie Babik
                      91babik@gw.wmich.edu
 CS MAJORS:  We do more after 11:00 p.m. than most people do all day.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: STTNG Season Six Broadcast Schedule
Date: 11 Oct 92 18:07:38 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout

In article <1b8947INNors@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright) writes:
<
<In article <8525@orbit.cts.com> chris@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Chris Jacobson) writes:
<|
<|                         Season Six Broadcast Schedule
<|
<...
<|127.  09/19/92  227  46001.3      Time's Arrow II
<|128.  09/26/92  228  46041.1      Realm of Fear
<|129.  10/03/92  229  46071.6      Man of the People
<|130.  10/10/92  230               Relics
<|131.  10/17/92  231               Schisms
<|132.  10/24/92  232               Q-Me
<|133.  10/31/92  233               Rascals
<|134.  11/07/92  234               A Fistful of Datas
<|135.  11/14/92  235               The Quality of Life
<|      11/21/92  227R 46001.3      Time's Arrow II
<|      11/28/92  228R 46041.1      Realm of Fear
<|      12/05/92  229R 46071.6      Man of the People
<|
<
<Why so many repeats? 
<Isn't that only nine episodes--and at least two of them so so?

Gee, where have you been for the past six seasons?  It is the same every year.
Well, except for the second season where the writer's strike caused a major
glitch.  Here is how the seasons broke down:

One:
	2 hr premiere
	9 new
	premiere broken up into two-parter
	3 repeats
	7 new
	2 repeats
	2 new
	2 repeats
	6 new
	rest repeats

Two:
	4 new
	3 repeats from first season
	1 new
	1 repeat
	5 repeats
	3 new
	2 repeats
	5 new
	3 repeats
	2 new
	1 repeat
	2 new
	rest repeats

Three:
	9 new (interesting that :-)
	5 repeats
	2 new
	2 repeats
	4 new
	2 repeats
	4 new
	2 repeats
	4 new
	1 repeat
	2 new
	1 repeat
	1 new
	rest repeats

Four:
	9 new (gee, there it is again :-)
	5 repeats
	2 new
	2 repeats
	4 new
	2 repeats
	4 new
	2 repeats
	4 new
	1 repeat
	2 new
	1 repeat
	1 new
	rest repeats

Five:
	9 new (damn, there it is again :-)
	6 repeats
	1 new
	2 repeats
	6 new
	1 repeat
	3 new
	2 repeats
	5 new
	1 repeat
	1 new
	1 repeat
	1 new
	rest repeats

There you have it.  The pattern has been pretty much the same over the years.
Obviously you haven't been paying attention :-)
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
From: s892024@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au (Richard A. Muirden [GA])
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Da books (was: all this nonsense about the Dianes)
Date: 16 Oct 92 11:45:22 GMT
Organization: RMIT Computer Centre
NNTP-Posting-Host: minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au

kfr@pro-freedom.cts.com (Kurt Roithinger) writes:

>well, while we're at it listing the all-time worst trek novels - let's not
>forget "dreadnought!" easily the worst novel i have ever read (trek or
>other). anyone want to comment on how bad (or good - NOT!)
>"battlestations!" was?

I thought they were both good. At least we got a unique 3rd person's
viewpoint of Kirk and friends and I thought the stories were good. Granted
"Battlestations!" was a little worse than Dreadnought...


>ProLine:  kfr@pro-freedom
>Internet: kfr@pro-freedom.cts.com
>UUCP:     crash!pro-freedom!kfr
>==============================================================

-richard

-- 
Richard Muirden, System Administator, RMIT.Aero. Engineering.. Office: 10.12.25
raeram@kittyhawk.aero.rmit.OZ.AU, s892024@minyos.xx.rmit.OZ.AU 'phone: 660-3142
ram@lionet.wesley.OZ.AU, ram@coombs.anu.edu.au - in case you don't like RMIT! :)
----------------- Fanatic of Shostakovich and "Star Trek" ---------------------
From: lopresti@henson.cc.wwu.edu (lopresti robert)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Fox SF: ST:TNG alumni, ALien Nation, etc
Date: 7 Oct 92 20:59:17 GMT
Article-I.D.: henson.1992Oct7.205917.13207
Organization: Western Washington University


 
    Latest issue of Broadcasting (Sept 28 92) has an interesting
short article on p. 18.  Two in fact.
 
    The first says that while Paramount is considering a seventh
"and final" Star Trek movie with the original cast, W. Shatner
is pitching a tv series based on the Tek science fiction
novels he wrote.  (The article says he wrote them "with Ron
Goulart" which is the first time I've seen that
officially acknowledged).  SOmebody describes the series as "TJ Hooker
in Outer Space," which is the knid of dumb think tv execs say.  Shatner
would be a guest star, not a regular.
 
     But the main reason I'm writing is another article on the
same page that says Fox is considering several SF series.
 Supposedly they have committed to making a pilot based on
the Circuit Trilogy, novels by Melinda Snodgrass (MS wrote
ST:TNG's "The Measure of a Man" and was promptly hired as
their script supervisor, or some such title...from what
I have heard she deserves  much of the credit for TNG's
drastic improvement between seasons 2 and 3).
 
     Joe Manowski and Brannon Braga, also out of ST:TNG
are supposed to have a commitment from Fox for six episodes
of an SF series to be called Real Time.
 
     And finally....drum roll please...
 
     "It was also rumored that Fox might try to resurrect
Alien Nation, which has established a small cult following,
or at least produce new episodes for the Sci-Fi Channel."
 
     (Sci-Fi Channel has purchased the rights to show the AN
reruns).
 
     Fox spokeswoman has not verified any of the above rumors.
 
 
Robert Lopresti                    "It would be a better world for the 
Wilson Library                      children if the parents ate the
spinach."
WWU, Bellingham, WA                                   -Groucho Marx
98225-9103                     lopresti@henson.cc.wwu.edu
             MY OPINIONS AND MINE ALONE...............
 
 
 
henson
From: pip@pro-freedom.cts.com (David Pipgras)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: "Yes, Ma'am." (was: Re: *Spoiler* Comments on "Man of the People")
Date: 13 Oct 92 07:28:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: pro-free.1992Oct13.002815.4401
Organization: ProLine [pro-freedom] AppleVan (Apple UG of Vancouver, WA)

In <1bdhb2INNrud@gap.caltech.edu>
thogek@cco.caltech.edu (Thomas G. Kiefer) writes:

>In article <1992Oct8.203739.16475@msi.com> bill@msi.com writes:
>[...stuff...]
>>She even seem to use her authority as Lt. Commander to coerce Ensign
>>willing-and-able.  When the ensign left her quarters, she spoke of "if
>>I need you, I know where to find you" and he answered "yes maam".  Not
>>one who was seduced, but rather forced.
>
>I don't know if this was important or not, but Ensign W&A addressing Troi
>as "Ma'am" struck me as weird.  I thought all people -- male and female
>-- in the times of Star Trek were addressed uniformly as "Sir".  Or is
>that just for officers in Star Fleet?  (And would Troi be considered an
>"officer" on this necessarily, being, as someone pointed out that she
>should be, outside the chain of command?)
>
>Just asking.
>
>-- 
>+---------------------------------+----------------------------+
>|          Thomas Kiefer          |  "Luminous beings are we,  |
>|  thogek@cco.caltech.edu --or--  |  not this crude matter."   |
>|  thogek@seismo.gps.caltech.edu  |                    - Yoda  |



Well, I would think that after the all to willing Ensign left Troi's
quarters just after a roll in the psych, that saying "yes sir" would sound
even weirder.... Besides, do you really, *really* think she had for *force*
him ????


Dave
==============================================================
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: Q11343@maccvm.corp.mot.com (Jonathan Ogden)
Subject: Re: Realm of Fear: space worms ???
Organization: Motorola
Date: 8 Oct 1992 09:25:36 CDT

------------------------- Original Article -------------------------
From: paul@pj.tmc.edu (Thorongil)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Realm of Fear: space worms ???
Date: 7 Oct 92 19:34:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: ra.1992Oct7.193455.27170
Organization: Mississippi State University ERC

Stuff deleted.....
>Ok, here are my possible conjectures as to this and the show.
>For one most of the things in question were explained in the show itself.
>The reason the crew members appeared as worms was because due to the
>fact that all the matter was out of phase in the transporter beam things
>didn't appear as they should.
>
>The reason they were able to stay dematerialized was mentioned as well.
>The inonization energy pulses of the plazma stream was enough to keep
>the patterns from disintegrating.  Something like that.  Watch the show
>again.
>
>The reason why they were in the transporter was that they were trying to
>rid themselves of the microbes.  And the 5th crew member found dead was
>the one who put them in the transporter beam.  They weren't trying to
>transport anywhere.
>

So how did the fifth crew member die?  Good explanation except for
that one tiny hole.

The 5th crew member died because he was infected with the microbes.
The explosion also possibly burned him, but I assume that the effect
of the microbes possibly caused the burn marks as well.

I don't see any holes....

Jon
From: cvantwrp@news.weeg.uiowa.edu (Cyndi Van Antwerp)
Subject: Re:  MOTP Crusher & Picard
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 14:40:29 GMT

Crusher rushed to Picard, true, but I didn't find it odd at all.
He is their _Captain_ and the most important person on the ship.
He'd been attacked.  Crusher's first duty was to treat him and 
make sure he was all right.

-- 
Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans.
					-- John Lennon

Cyndi Van Antwerp
From: chris@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Chris Jacobson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: STTNG Season Six Broadcast Schedule
Date: 13 Oct 92 05:25:01 GMT
Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN.

brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes:
>In article <8525@orbit.cts.com> chris@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Chris Jacobson)
writes:
><
><                        STAR TREK:  THE NEXT GENERATION
><                         Season Six Broadcast Schedule
><                                 October 1992
><
><Dates indicate the day of satellite uplink, 'PC' denotes Paramount Code, and
><'R' denotes Repeat.  Stardates will be added when known.
><
><Ep    Date      PC   Stardate     Title
><----  --------  ---  -----------  ----------------------------------------
><127.  09/19/92  227  46001.3      Time's Arrow II
><128.  09/26/92  228  46041.1      Realm of Fear
><129.  10/03/92  229  46071.6      Man of the People
><130.  10/10/92  230               Relics
><131.  10/17/92  231               Schisms
><132.  10/24/92  232               Q-Me
><
>< [...]
><
>
>Damn, this sure looks like my schedule, the one I just recently posted.  Even
>the stardate note is word-for-word.
>--
>      harvard\                        spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
>Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
>      rutgers/          INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
>                                   brown@wi.extrel.com

Are you just discovering that I post a broadcast schedule too???  It looks
like your schedule, but it's not.  The biggest difference between them are the
dates listed.  The dates on my schedule reflect the satellite uplink which is
Saturdays at 6pm, and Sundays (the next day) at 2pm.  It just so happens that
we posted our schedules at the same time.

Wait!  Was it not I that posted the first season six broadcast schedule?  I
believe so.  And when you posted yours, you didn't hear me saying, "Damn, this
sure looks like my schedule, the one I just recently posted.  Even the
stardate note is word-for-word."

Chris Jacobson
People-NET [pnet51]                        INTERNET: chris@pnet51.orb.mn.org
Minneapolis, MN
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: sparckl@leland.Stanford.EDU (Citrus King Lemons (R))
Subject: Re: What did Picard say?
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 92 07:37:55 GMT

In article <Bvs0DJ.2A7@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> schamber@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca (Sylvain Chamberland) writes:
>In article <1992Oct6.172401.9035@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> sabat@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:
>>Does anyone know what Picard says at the end of the episode (I think "The
>>Enemy") where Geordie and a Romulan are stranded on a planet and learn to
>>help each other barely making it back to the Enterprise at the end when the
>>big E and a Romulan warbird are about to blast each other.  It is something
>>like "______manship is a dangerous game."  We have rewatched it several times
>>and cannot figure it out.  Thanks
>>
>>Ted			Sabat@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
>
>Well, to me it sounded like "brigmanship" or "bringmanship", but I don't
>have any idea about the meaning of that word. (well, I got an idea,
>judging by the context, but that's all.)
>
>(Please don't flame me for my lack of vocabulary, I'm still learning this
>language)

I believe the word was "brinkmanship", which (roughly) 'dancing on the edge of
something dangerous (e.g., a brink)'.

>-- 
>Sylvain Chamberland           INTERNET: schamber@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca   
>Dept. of Biology          -----------------------------------------------------
>University of Waterloo    |  "Biochimiste un jour, biochimiste toujours!"
>Waterloo, Ontario, Canada |                               - anonyme

===============================================================================
	        "I'd never eat anyone who could play his face!"
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[  sparCKL@leland.stanford.edu  ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
		  Curtis "See?  You Are Tea (Aye, Yes)." Chen
       	 ...fornoadmirablereasonshethoughtitmightbefuntoscreamathim...
===============================================================================
From: jreiss@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Joseph W Reiss)
Subject: S.O.S.: Call for Opinions
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 02:10:54 GMT


Just a healthy reminder that I am now accepting ratings (NO LETTER
GRADES, please) for the fourth episode of this sixth season -- Relics.

I hope to make two S.O.S. postings on all future episodes.  One will
be made Thursday, for those weekend viewers who want a little idea of
what to expect.  The second will be on Sunday or maybe Monday at the
latest, wrapping up all the ratings I get from reviewers at the end of
the week.

Okay, now let's get those ratings flowing.  Hup, two, three, four...

Joe
-- 
__________       |  jreiss@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
  |   |___)      | """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
\_/OE |  \EISS   |  Captain, I sense a presence.  It's...it's horrible,
          `----  |  vile, evil.  It's...it's...a SPLIT!!!  (Arrrrrrgh!)
From: sdt8s@curry.edschool.Virginia.EDU (Steve Tilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: _Best Destiny_ novel: Diane Carey can't write!
Date: 12 Oct 92 03:38:58 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu  writes:
> 
>      I haven't bought STAR TREK novels regularly since Richard
>      Arnold's reign of terror began and all those regulations
>      on creative imagination were imposed (fascism) - but I
>      noticed in the book store today a new hardcover
>      called BEST DESTINY by Diane Carey.
> 
>      In case anyone was thinking of buying never having read Carey
>      before -- DON'T.  This egomaniacal woman couldn't write a 
>      decent shopping list let alone an intelligent novel.  
> 
>      My two cents in case anyone cares anyway...  :-)
> 
> 
>                  Shortly  thereafter, the health of  Annie
>                  Blackburn still in question, the behavior
>                  of Special Agent  Dale Cooper was noticed
>                  __________________________to have changed.
>                                               Scott Gorcey.            

Come on, Scott, don't hold back...tell us what you REALLY
think...

Steve
--
D.A.M.: Mothers Against Dyslexia
Steve's address is no longer sdt8s@poe.acc.virginia.edu;
I got booted to a new machine: sdt8s@curry.edschool.virginia.edu.
I'm working on a new .sig but not as we speak.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder)
Subject: Re: Sulu's phaser trivia (was: Re: The Enemy Within
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 21:51:10 GMT

In article <1992Oct07.190940.3763@admiral.uucp> dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman) writes:

[...on what's unusual about Sulu's phaser in "Enemy Within"...]

>>Sorry, that's not the answer.  McCoy also does this in "A Private Little
>>War".  Wanna try again?
>
>It runs out of power?
>
>>So far, of all the e-mail responses I've recieved, only one gentleman
>>had answered correctly.  Everyone else has also guessed "heating the
>>rocks", so don't feel bad.

And the answer is... the phaser fires three beams simaltaneously.  The
phaser is never seen to do this in any other episode.


>>Last night's triv question:  In Charlie X, who supplies the voice of the
>>ship's galley captain?  This one also completely stumped me.  E-mail
>>welcome, or post to the group for guesses.  [you may be surprised at the
>>answer to this one.]
>
>James Doohan?


Someone else also guessed this.  The correct answer is: Gene
Roddenberry.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Schroeder  		|  
schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov         |             Boo. 
Brookhaven National Laboratory  | 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Subject: "realm of fear" prece
Reply-To: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 10 Oct 92 18:59:59 EST

>        Incidental spoilers for "Realm of Fear" follow:

>        I won't say anything about the episode itself, except that it
>blew, IMHO.  However, it seems Paramount was busy setting precedents
>for upcoming stuff:

I thought the idea was sorta cheesy, the snake-like alien looked veeery
kiddy, but the followup was very enjoyable to watch!  I loved all the
Barclay scenes, especially the one in his quarters inquiring the
computer about transporter psychosis.  The part when he starts feeling
his pulse, squinting his eyes, and realizing he drank water was a beut!

>        -- It looks as if they've finally decided what O'Brian's rank
>is, since he now had one open pip (which I've previously argued can't
>apply to any commissioned rank), instead of two full ones, on his
>collar.  Note that this also implies that the two full pips really did
>mean he was a Lieutenant, and they just retconned it.  (Maybe O'Brien's
>rank was the one thing they did change by going back in time. :-))
>        Anyway, I guess they wanted to settle this issue before he gets
>promoted for Deep Space Nine.

I thought they let out a LOT of info that could easily be called a YATI,
like the line "How many people were lost through the transporter in the
last 50 years?  2?  *3*???"...  I'm sure O'Brien's lost SOMEONE during
his *22* years as a transporter chief?

Also, doesn't that mean he was tactical officer for that Captain in "The
Wounded" over 23 years ago?

>        -- Finally, did that bit about people being caught in the
>transporter stream strike anyone else as a precedent for the cheesy
>events that are likely to set up "Relics".

Hell, I did.  Data, however, did not get into the specifics like when
the TNG Tech Manual said.  The Tech Manual says that a person can be put
in stasis for only 5 minutes without serious image degredation.

For Relics, it would be great if they had Barclay do a cameo, pointing
at Scotty and saying "See!  THAT'S what I'm afraid of!  Transporter
psychosis...!  Ha!  That's NOTHING compared to having your molecules
ripped apart and......."



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jason Wong
Calling from Markham, Ontario CANADA.  It's not cold though!  :-)
INTERNET: bernie.wong@canrem.com

 * OLX 2.1 TD * An INCIDENT?!?  Sulu
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044