HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Hazrateh Zainab as an experimental feezeezeest
Keywords: Z = 666 ( Zainab's constant )
Date: 6 Oct 92 04:50:27 GMT
Organization: I WON THE BET!

In article <5OCT199216135150@reg.triumf.ca> mahin@reg.triumf.ca  writes:
>
>>Let me conclude by asking 'how do we KNOW for sure that matter exists?'
>>                                     ^^^^
>
>Let's ask Seyyed.  He knows EVERYTHING. Hey, Seyyed,... 
>                                                   [ (c) Life cereal ]

First of all, the question was for 'we.'  It is true that Seyyed knows, but
how do WE know?

>and here's a fun experiment for Seyyed joon exclusively.  Put a cup of
>water in the microwave for a few minutes, open the door and drop a grain of
>sugar in it. *vicious laugh* Then read your Koran and try to explain the
>results.  Btw, have a first aid kit handy.:-)
>
>Good Luck,
>
>Hazrateh Zainab

"mahin khAnoom, 'dari vari' [(c) Seyyed, 92] nagoo."

Seyyed is busy because his professor asked him to concentrate on his studies.
tAzeh, after he has time I am in queue to be responded, OK?  I even got a 
Seiko watch, so since we are equal (we KNOW that, right?) "lotfan nobat rA
ra'Ayat farmAeed."


Hooshyar F. Naraghi
bavafa@netcom.com
(415) 322-8056

PS.  I won the bet with my non-internet friend.  I bet that if I say 'how
do we KNOW' and anything else, it would trigger you to say something.  His
condition was that your something had to include Seyyed.  I won.  See you
at Meykadeh.  :-)
From: seyyed@wuee1.wustl.edu (Seyyed Mahdavian)
Subject: Mahin decides not to shut up
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis Mo.
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 17:52:14 GMT

In article <1992Sep26.014749.2662@unixg.ubc.ca> mahin@reg.triumf.ca  writes:

>No, "I" can't see the difference. Can YOU see the difference?
>*laugh*

Laugh Mahin, laugh ...
Surely you are not so smart to imagine how much trouble you are making for
yourself.

Seyyed.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi)
Subject: Re: What to Talk about
Organization: Chalk
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 00:34:11 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.194011.2786@EE.Stanford.EDU> mack@isl.Stanford.EDU (mack) writes:
>bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi) writes:
>
>    [...]
>
>>'ey bAbA.'  You guys are very young.  'bebinam,' are you the product of free
>>milk and biscuit during Shah?
>
>You mean milk in those pyramid containers (shir e seh goosh) and cake
>With occasional apple or orange? No, I never saw such things!  :-)

Mack, how do I know the kinds?  I was not from that era. :-) In my time we
would buy a pirAshki for 15 rials for lunch, or on wealthy days a 'loobiA
dAgh' for 25 rials.  As for 10 O'clock snack, just forget it.  During 
'zang-e tafrih' we were throwing 'gach' at each other!

Regards,
Hooshyar F. Naraghi
bavafa@netcom.com
(415) 322-8056




Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: 9999sc01@uhdvx3.dt.uh.edu (Alexandre Khalil)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Farsi/Arabic on the Net
Date: 5 Oct 92 02:42:00 GMT
Organization: University of Houston-Downtown
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41A
X-Lunar-Date: 6 days, 14 hours, 12 minutes since the new moon

Most of us at one point in time have used transliteration to communicate.

Is there an Arabic editor/mailer/news reader in use on some site on the Net ??

By Arabic, I mean the Arabic character set also shared by Farsi, Urdu and other
languages.

alex khalil alex@dt.uh.edu
U. of Houston-Downtown
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: farzin@apollo3.apollo3.ntt.JP (Farzin Mokhtarian)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Turkish-Kurd battle kills over 160
Date: 1 Oct 92 02:15:00 GMT
	<1992Sep30.205701.24793@walter.bellcore.com>
Organization: none




From: Japan Times, October 1, 1992
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
Turkish-Kurd battle kills over 160
           
ANKARA (Reuter-Kyodo) More than 160 people were killed in a battle
between Kurdish separatists and Turkish troops near the Iraqi-Turkish
border. It was the bloodiest engagement since Kurds launched a 
guerrilla campaign for independence in 1984.
    
Prime Minister Suleyman Demirel said Wednesday that 29 soldiers and
124 fighters of the separatist Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) died in
the 12-hour battle Tuesday around Semdinli in Hakkari Province.
About 500 guerrillas took part.
   
Five civilians and three village guards paid by the government had
also died in the fighting, he added.
                 
.....
            
Demirel said more than 1000 PKK rebels and about 600 civilians and
400 security forces had died this year. More than 5000 PKK militants
had been captured.
"We have to defeat them, we can defeat them and we will defeat them,"
he declared.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                
Sounds like it is Turkey's turn to have a war.
         
  - Farzin Mokhtarian
    farzin@apollo3.ntt.jp
From: yaser@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Ala)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: What is MKO position on the Islands?
Date: 2 Oct 92 23:21:24 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

saied@cwis.unomaha.edu (Saied*) writes:

>yaser@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Ala) writes:
>>I was wondering what is the position of Mujaahedin
>>with regard to the 3 Iranian islands now being claimed
>>by different Arab states?  Usually our resident MKO supporters
>>are very quick in declaring their positions on national and international
>>issues, whoever, I have not heard anything regarding this issue.

>Thus, their the Mojahedin's objective is to use all
>their reseources and energy towards removing the current
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>regime and replacing it with a progrssive, democratic
					    ~~~~~~~~~~
>and nationalist government. Once we have a national
>and democratic government, and with the help of the
>Iranian people, I am sure, fair and nationalist
				     ~~~~~~~~~~~
>solutions can easily be formulated to deal with the
~~~~~~~~~~
>international issues.

This is a very weak position in connection with Iran's territorial
integrity.  There is onlu ONE nationalistic solution to this problem.

You sound like Mujaahedin are even ready to compomise on Iran's
territory to achieve their goal of removing their competitors in Tehraan.

Iran has NEVER had a democracy.  Imagine if Iranains did not defend
this land because there were not democracy, justice, and freedom.
Then there would not be an IRAN.  The land of Iran is a sacred land
and defending it is no different than performing a religious duty.

Democracy, justice, freedom, and better living is an internal matter
that should be settled internally.  When IRAN is confronted with the 
enemy of IRAN (Saddam is a clear example) then

 ALL IRANIANS SHOULD BE UNITED IN DEFENDING THE LAND.

This is our duty as an Iranian.  Iran is alive because of the sacrifices
of men and women who gave their lives to defend this land so that we 
enjoy its beauty and utilize its resources.

ANYONE WHO DOUBTS THIS SHOULD REEVALUATE HIS/HER ATTACHMENT TO IRAN

Ala
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: ebrahim@ee.umanitoba.ca (Mohamad Ebrahimi)
Subject: Re: What is MKO position on the Islands?
Organization: Elect & Comp Engineering, U of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba,Canada
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 20:13:42 GMT

     In article: <saied.717810619@cwis> saied@cwis.unomaha.edu (Saied*)
writes:

>>yaser@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Ala) writes:
>>I was wondering what is the position of Mujaahedin
>>with regard to the 3 Iranian islands now being claimed
>>by different Arab states?  Usually our resident MKO supporters
>>are very quick in declaring their positions on national and international
>>issues, whoever, I have not heard anything regarding this issue.

>Here is my response based on my familiarity with
>the Mojahedin's positions: The Mojahedin's primary
>concern is the suffering of the Iranian people and
>the fact that as long as the illegitimate Khomeini
>regime is continuing its backward rule in Iran,
>Iran's resources, wealth, human talent, etc. will
>be wasted and that the country will not progrss.

>Thus, their the Mojahedin's objective is to use all
>their reseources and energy towards removing the current
>regime and replacing it with a progrssive, democratic
>and nationalist government. Once we have a national
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>and democratic government, and with the help of the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Iranian people, I am sure, fair and nationalist
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>solutions can easily be formulated to deal with the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>international issues.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


And here's the translation of above in human language:

    The goal of MKO is to gain power and stablish their dictatorship in 
Iran. Thus in this way they don't care about teritorial integrity of
Iran. they don't mind to sell their soul, body, and country to Sadam
Hussein to help them. They don't mind to give up Iranian islands if it
means more help and money from reactionary Arab states and more recognition
(read employment) from US Congress. They are ready, as they were completly
involved during Iraqi aggression against Iran, to be of any assistance
to enemies of Iranian people in puring tens of thausands of bombs on
Iranian cities, just to be able to continue their ridiculus game of
Liberation Army ( read squad), etc. 

    Who these guys think Iranian people are?!
From: vforo@ecst.csuchico.edu (ROMIN)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Physics-1A Question
Date: 30 Sep 92 09:39:31 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico


In article <massoud.120.717782103@chemteca.sdsu.edu> massoud@chemteca.sdsu.edu (Massoud Ajami) writes:

>In article <na+p5!+.bavafa@netcom.com> bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi) writes:
>>From: bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi)
>>Subject: Physics-1A Question
>>Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 07:53:34 GMT
>>After reading few articles about late ostAd Hessabi, I got encouraged to
>>ask an elementary physics question.  Although it does not directly have
>>anything to do with s.c.iranian, but I thought with our resident physics
>>major netters perhaps it could spark a new tread - a scientific one.
>>
>>Water boils at temperature of 100 degrees C (or 212 degrees F).  Can we
>>prove it?  If yes, how?
>>
>Whenever water boils is called 100 degree C, not the other way around. The 
>degree C is an arbitrary selection of unit.
> 
>>Perhaps I should have asked can we prove the concept of 
>temperature as an absolute property of matter?
>>
>If you look at temperature as an energy (which is), then every thing falls
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>in its place.

Since when temperature became an energy! heat is a kind of energy which can be 
transferd to a body or remove from it(the easy concept of it). Temp. is 
the way u explean the hotness or coldness of a body(again the basic meaning).
To prove the water boiling, use heat(Q) as the amount of energy added to the
water divide by (the mass of the water times the density of water( 80 cal/g)) 
Of cource, it is asumed the initial temperature of the water is 0 C.

>You want challenge? Time is two dimentional!!
>
>
>Peace and Prosperity!
>  ---==< 110 >==---

ROMIN
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: babak@orac.crissp.qut.edu.au (Babak Mohajerin)
Subject: test please ignore
Organization: The Ohio State University Department of Computer and Information Science
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 15:04:12 GMT

this is just a test


have a nice day

nothing bellow this line
-- 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: ronf@panther3.panther.mot.com (Ron Feigen)
Subject: Re: Physics-1A Question
Organization: Motorola Panther Project, Chandler, AZ
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 21:30:17 GMT

In article <massoud.120.717782103@chemteca.sdsu.edu> massoud@chemteca.sdsu.edu (Massoud Ajami) writes:
>In article <na+p5!+.bavafa@netcom.com> bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi) writes:
>>From: bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi)
>>Subject: Physics-1A Question
>>Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 07:53:34 GMT
>>After reading few articles about late ostAd Hessabi, I got encouraged to
>>ask an elementary physics question.  Although it does not directly have
>>anything to do with s.c.iranian, but I thought with our resident physics
>>major netters perhaps it could spark a new tread - a scientific one.
>>
>>Water boils at temperature of 100 degrees C (or 212 degrees F).  Can we
>>prove it?  If yes, how?
>>
>Whenever water boils is called 100 degree C, not the other way around. The 
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>degree C is an arbitrary selection of unit.

Aren't yopu forgetting one small item?  Altitude!  100c at sealevel, I believe.

> 
>>Perhaps I should have asked can we prove the concept of 
>temperature as an absolute property of matter?
>>
>If you look at temperature as an energy (which is), then every thing falls
>in its place.
>  
>>Regards,
>>Hooshyar F. Naraghi
>>bavafa@netcom.com
>>(415) 322-8056
>>
>You want challenge? Time is two dimentional!!

If you finish with time try a real tough one, military intelligence.

>
>
>Peace and Prosperity!
>  ---==< 110 >==---
-- 

>
Ron Feigen
ronf@panther.mot.com
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi)
Subject: Another Physics-1A Question
Organization: physics
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 00:19:04 GMT

In article <BvDtuo.LqM@news.udel.edu> keivan@brahms.udel.edu (Keivan 
Esfarjani) writes:

>SalAm bar to ey HooshyAr , and the rest of ahAli.

sAm daleykom, keivan jAn.

>( BTW have you bought your seiko watch yet? :-)

Nope.  I thought somebody was going to anxciously buy it for me.  :-)

BTW, after freshman year when I learned Albert proposed that time was
relative, I gave up on watches. :-)

>>>>Perhaps I should have asked can we prove the concept of 
>>>temperature as an absolute property of matter?

>I am not sure I understand your question HooshyAr khAn, all I can
>say is that temperature is a property of matter in the sense that 
>any material object has a well defined temperature FIELD (meaning it 
>does not have to be uniform throughout your object) in other words, at 
>each point of the oject you can define (and/or measure) the temperature.
>Furthermore you cannot define temperature without the presence of matter.
>I hope it answers the question.

Thanks, yes it helped.  I guess I am looking for the answer in such a way
we ask the question of 'which one came first, egg or chicken.'  May I 
elaborate a little further:  we cannot define temperature without the
presence of matter perhaps because it is a property of the matter.  Now,
can we say matter exists because it has temperature?  In other words for
matter to exist, does it require to possess a property, among many other
properties, such as temperature?

Or, is it the other way, that is matter exists as it is and it just happens 
that we humans have learned - through experiments - that it has certain
properties.  In this case, we cannot construct the phrase 'look, I am
telling you matter exists and the reason is it has properties that _I_
can detect and even measure.'

>ChAkereem :-)
'man bishtar!'

Hooshyar F. Naraghi
bavafa@netcom.com
(415) 322-8056

>A real challenge now for everybody:
>The other day my friend was telling me that his professor had told him
>that warm water freezes faster than cold water!!!!

By faster shall we assume he meant less time?

I only remember from Thermo in college that warm water would take more
heat to solidify, right?  But, I have no idea of the time dependency of
either experiments.  Could this have to do with the rate of heat supplied to
the process, or power as dQ/dt?
                         |
                         |------> I know, it's delta but I have none!
From: marand@eagle.wpd.sgi.com (Najmeh Marand)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Shahreh Farang
Keywords: shahr shahreh farangeh, az hameh rangeh
Date: 6 Oct 92 23:33:36 GMT
Organization: System Software Technology Center, Silicon Graphics

In article <amoojoon.145@ghahveh.khooneh.mash.yadollAh>,
amoojoon@ghahveh.khooneh.mash.yadollAh (Bacheh Morshed) writes:
> 
> SalAm ahAliyeh mohtaram,
> 
> [stuff deletd]
> 
> NAmeh oon yeki khAnom Noushineh
> monzajer az hejAb-o az pooshineh
> bA Mahin-o Najmeh hamegi ham-dardan
             ~~~~~~
> migeh sezAyeh mardA Abeh jooshineh!
> 
> [stuff deleted]
>
> ************************************************************
> 
> bA ham mehrabAn bAsheed,
> 
> amoo


Since it is fairly safe to assume I am the only Najmeh on
SCI, I am replying to above:

	With all due respect to Noushin and Mahin, not knowing
	either of them personally or otherwise except for having
	glanced at few of their articles which are on totally
	different topics than those I have posted, I would not
	group myself with them as amoo seems to have done in the
	above piece!

	I have not posted anything regarding "hejAb" and/or what 
	is or is not "sezAyeh mardA"!

	Did amoo perhaps make a typo-error and meant to say 
	Naghmeh (?)

Najmeh (not Naghmeh)
From: mack@isl.Stanford.EDU (mack)
Subject: Re: Statistics on recent Censore in Iran
Organization: Stanford University
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 19:55:22 GMT

sepehr@acsu.buffalo.edu (Ramin S.) writes:
>yaser@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Ala) writes:
>>
>>31% of Iranians are illitrate.
>
>This is nothing, now that all primary schools and high schools require
>tuition, this number will raise pretty soon.
>
>Where the hell in world can you find a non-free education but our dearest
>Iran? 
>If the schools are not free, then where does our taxes go?

Yours and mine go to Uncle Sam.   :-)

>Well, Long live Iranian Government.
>
>Ramin

    --mack

--
She's closing her eyes, then she takes me away,
and she's pulling the strings, when she's playing with love.
She's playing with love.                       --Alphaville
From: hossein@nu.Berkeley.EDU (Karbalie Hossein)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Lotfi Zadeh and Claude Shannon
Date: 29 Sep 92 06:08:15 GMT
Reply-To: hossein@nu.Berkeley.EDU (Karbalie Hossein)

To Farshid and other interested netters,

	It is difficult if not impossible to judge Prof. Zadeh's
work and its significance in comparasion to Shannon's. As a 
student of Zadeh, even though not very recent one, I may be slightly 
biased, but Zadeh's contribution does not end with fuzzy logic and fuzzy
controllers. His other, and equally significant, contribution
to the general field of control is the notion of possibility
which is substantially different from that of probability.
Zadeh's work is significant in the domain that it is a major
step towards realizing the effects of unkowns in the controller
and the system. It is a great idea, along with those of people in
adaptive and roboust control, in that it tries to incorporate 
unkowns into the system. 

	Fuzzy logic has been very well recieved by the scholars in
the US as well as around the world for many years. There is a 
journal of Fuzzy Logic that is edited by Zadeh and others for many
years, more than 10. It is unfair to diminish the accomplishments
of a great teacher and a great researcher such as Zadeh.

--Kal Hossein
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: mack@isl.Stanford.EDU (mack)
Subject: Re: What to Talk about
Organization: Stanford University
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 19:40:11 GMT

bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi) writes:

    [...]

>2 - Who coined the term "si metri-yA," and what is the story behind it?
>
>And Mack replies to the same question as:
>
>>Got me.
>
>'ey bAbA.'  You guys are very young.  'bebinam,' are you the product of free
>milk and biscuit during Shah?

You mean milk in those pyramid containers (shir e seh goosh) and cake
With occasional apple or orange? No, I never saw such things!  :-)

>Hooshyar F. Naraghi

    --mack

--
She's closing her eyes, then she takes me away,
and she's pulling the strings, when she's playing with love.
She's playing with love.                       --Alphaville
From: smortaz@handel.Eng.Sun.COM (Shahrokh Mortazavi)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Seyyed the  Fanatic freak  Re: Mahin the joojeh kAfer
Date: 3 Oct 1992 01:43:13 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View, CA  USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: handel
Keywords: Seyyed's God aint mine!

In article <1992Sep23.154920.24443@dbu.edu> arfad@dbu.edu (Arfad) writes:
>In article seyyed@wuee1.wustl.edu (Seyyed Mahdavian) writes:
>|>
>|> You are a stupid woman Mahin. Your physics God, Einstein, believed in God and
>|> was a religious man.  No one is asking you to become a Moslem. Just shut up.
>|>
>|> Seyyed.
>
>
>Look who is talking!  A so called moslem?  HUH!
>
>Your every mention of God or Islam is an affront to the truly
>religious persons around the world.  You're an embarrassment
>to the name "Seyyed" .  You and your close-minded fundamentalist
>friends should go crawl back under your rocks.
	^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

oh no!  seyyed should very much continue on his highly educational
run of what the world would be like if people like him took over
everywhere.  he still doesnt have a *clue* about how much damage
he's done to his credibility during his quest to pile up kissy points
for his afterlife.

>Shame on you Seyyed, go wash your mouth!

try so4h2, mouthwashes have alcohol.

>
>ArfAd


Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: payman@hardy.u.washington.edu (Payman Arabshahi)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Lotfi Zadeh and Claude Shannon
Date: 29 Sep 92 00:32:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Sep29.003201.919
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <1992Sep28.224049.16121@walter.bellcore.com> 
farshid@baum.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Farshid Ketabchi) writes:

>This is sort of a follow-up to an earlier discussion about Lotfi Zadeh
>and fuzzy logic, which I just read.
>
>There was a mention there of comparing Zadeh's work to Shannon's
>contribution to EE.  Well, based on what I know, I think that's going
>a bit too far.
>

There is no question that Shannon's work, which basically includes
the fundamentals of Communication and Information Theory, is of
monumental significance in Electrical Engineering.  The comparison
drawn between Shannon and Zadeh was that they are the only two 
people who single handedly founded a field within the discipline
of Electrical Engineering, **and** who are presently alive.
The comparison was not made between the two fields; rather a
similarity between the two founders was noted.

-Payman
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi)
Subject: Re: What to Talk about
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 04:59:36 GMT
Organization: sci varzeshi

In article <Bv4HEn.165@news.udel.edu> keivan@brahms.udel.edu (Keivan Esfarjani)
writes:
>In article <6a9n6hd.bavafa@netcom.com> bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi)
writes:
>>K1 J1,
>>
>>What the hell [(c) Zafar T. minhaz] are you talking about?  Why don't you
>>shut up [(c) Seyyed]?
>
>Yes Sir, I am sorry Sir, next time I'll think before posting such nonsense.

Good.  Now we are done. [(c) 92 Frazin Mokhtarian]  :-)

:-)  :-)  these are for the other two, in case you took them seriously.

>What else could it possibly be? Discussion about Bahai's?! :-)

Cute!!  You got me here, and publicly.  Thanks, I got the message.

>>1 - Iran was the host to the Asian Olympic Games in '74.  What was the name
>>of the athlete who carried the torch to the stadium during the opening
>>ceremony?
>This is one of those things that when you give me the answer, I'll
>say: But of course! noke zaboonam bood-hA!
>But for now, I can't remember his name.

Me either :-) :-)

>>2 - Who coined the term "si metri-yA," and what is the story behind it?
>
>Unfortunately your questions are too hard for me; I can find the 
>plural for ezhdehA, but these ones really beat me.

And Mack replies to the same question as:

>Got me.

'ey bAbA.'  You guys are very young.  'bebinam,' are you the product of free
milk and biscuit during Shah?  I am sorry for posting difficult questions.
Actually I thought the term 'si metri-yA' was a very well known fact among
football fans.  It is as classic as 'shish tAeeyA.'  I was proved wrong.

>It was nice talking to you!

Same here, Keyan jAn.  I would really hope to meet you again.

Regards,
Hooshyar F. Naraghi
bavafa@netcom.com
(415) 322-8056

Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian