HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nbaym@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Nancy Baym)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC - Who killed Will?
Date: 7 Apr 92 02:45:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: ux1.1992Apr7.024501.12873
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

In article <1992Apr6.201950.28874@oz.plymouth.edu> patstew@oz.plymouth.edu (Pat Steward) writes:
>In article <1992Apr5.182347.7960@acsu.buffalo.edu> v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Michelle L. Zafron) writes:
>>
>>So what?  So An Li has stopped being the colorless little Asian stereotype of
>>the maiden?  What's wrong with that?  She's standing up for herself, good for
>>her.  And I love how all of her "friends" are turning on her.
>
>Michelle, this is a *REALLY* good point -- I couldn't quite put my
>finger on what disturbed me about An Li's being called a "bitch", but
>I think you've summed it up nicely.

I think it's a good point to (in fact the whole argument in An Li's defense
made me rethink my position on her). But it seems to me that her going to
Adam and railing on about how Haley could be the murderer is out of line. How
is this supposed to help her win Brian? And yes, Hayley was a mondo meanie
to her, but she was just beaten and nearly raped and this evokes NO sympathy
or concern at all from An Li? And yes, her arguments for why it would be
dumb for Brian to divorce her right now seem reasonable, but as one person
posted the INS storyline is unrealistic in real terms and it's also absurd
to think that the INS wouldn't be hip to what's going on. Weren't they going
to keep a close eye on things? And yes, Brian did marry her of his own free
will and stupidity, but when did that marriage get turned into a "He's my
husband, I'll stand by him" kind of marriage? Brian has always been clear with
her about what their marriage meant to him (except the boinkin' of course).
If she's fighting for what she wants I'd like to see her use a strategy with
a tiny bit of likelihood of working. I don't think she's bitchy because
she's fighting, I think she's bitchy because she's fighting for something
she has never had as though it is her right and she is doing it by 
intentionally hurting people in petty ways. I have no problem with the idea
of a woman fighting for a man, I wish Nat would've fought for Trevor, I
loved Erica fighting for Jack, but the pairing of An Li and Brian is no great
soap romance. (As far as I'm concerned Brian and Hayley aren't either --
guess they're supposed to fill the David and Melanie slot?).

Hoo, I got longwinded. Sorry, just wanted to present my views on why it
may not be politically incorrect to consider An Li a bitch.

-- 
"Education is the only place people try to get the least for their money"
						     --my mom
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Big time TAN (was Re: DOOL -- Snowballs in Hell)
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 03:01:31 GMT

In article <70064@ut-emx.uucp> pokey@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Vince Rhee) writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.025526.6806@chpc.utexas.edu> peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo) writes:
>>
>>'Course I'm only following up on this one 'cause I was provoked!!!  Tim
>>was right, Peach PIT must be much more closely related to Vick 'n Vince
>                                                                   ^^^^^
>
>	Heeeeyyyyyy....now wait just a darn tootin' minute...should
>	I be resenting this implication?

Resenting it?  Why should *you* resent it?  If anyone should resent it
I'd expect Icky and Carly...uh-oh, oops! chuckle, chuckle...Vickie and 
Tammy...yeah, that's who I meant!...to resent it.  Oh, wait...you 
should probably resent *this*.  Heh, heh.  :-)  BTW, are you hanging 
out in College Station this weekend?  I certainly hope not 'cause we 
wouldn't want you to get too depressed about the fact that the Horns 
are likely to beat up on the poor Ags again this weekend.  :-)  :-)  
Too bad the games aren't being televised.

>>Lemons are best!
>
>	But limes go better with Cuervo Gold... (gee, can you tell that
>	I'm starting my weekend a wee bit early? :-) )

I'm not surprised.  I hope you survive the series!  I guess since you
didn't proclaim to the net that y'all would win, there won't be any
grovelling 'come Monday, eh?  Too bad.

>>Joanna.
>
>TTFN,
>- Vince (aka Core-ona?)

Heh, heh.  Oooooo, quite clever.  Really.  I like it.  Keep it.

Joanna.

*  \____ ----- ____/            *  The University of Texas at Austin  *
*       ( o o )                 *   Petroleum Engineering Department  *
*        \   /   Gus-ball!!     *           (512) 471-3229            *
*         (_)  Hook 'em Horns!  *    peea224@hermes.chpc.utexas.edu   *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: dmf2@po.CWRU.Edu (Denise M. Fischer)
Subject: Re: DOOL -- Snowballs in Hell
Reply-To: dmf2@po.CWRU.Edu (Denise M. Fischer)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 92 15:12:14 GMT


In a previous article, volpe@bart.crd.ge.com (Christopher R Volpe) says:

>In article <1992Apr8.141920.4725@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, dmf2@po.CWRU.Edu
>(Denise M. Fischer) writes:
>
>|>you're referring to; it's called intrusive "r" and is common to
>several groups
>|>of people. You'll hear it in British speech a lot, but people from the North 
>|>East part of the United States (notably the Kennedys and people from
>the Boston 
>^^^^^^
>
>Huh? People from Boston generally have a hard time pronouncing r's at
>the end of syllables ("Ah you going to the New Yeah's Eve pahty?"). 
>I never hear them adding superfluous r's.
>

Ah, you touched on the other type of "r". The same people who put r's where
most people don't, don't put r's where most people do. The example our 
prof used was the sentence "There are seven days in a week." Someone who
speaks the dialect I referred to above might say something like "There ah
seven days in a week." (I can't remember why they pronounce the "r" in 
"there.") If you listen to JFK and RFK speeches, you'll hear examples of
both types of r's, however. JFK saying "Cuber" is the only example I can
think of off the top of my head.

-- 
Denise M. Fischer (dmf2@po.cwru.edu)       There's nothin' I hate more than
Network Information Coordinator, INS       nothin'. Nothin' keeps me up at
Case Western Reserve University            night.             -Edie Brickell
   "I use antlers in all of my decorating." Gaston, Beauty and the Beast
Organization: Office of the Dean - CFA, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Thu,  9 Apr 1992 09:42:57 -0400 
From: Liz Fox <lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: TAN: DOOL:
	<1992Apr8.123208.1228@bvc.edu>

On 08-Apr-92 in Re: TAN: DOOL:               
user galecristijo@bvc.edu writes:

> 
>Thanks Liz! (or should I say Banana?)  This helps a lot!
> 
You can call me Banana, Nana, Narna, Banana Split, Banana Peel, Nana
Split, Nana Peel, Bannie....

>Here's a few more possible peel names (some of them aren't truly peels but 
>sound ok)
>	- Radish Peel
>	- Turnip Peel
>	- Tangerine Peel
>	- Grapefruit Peel
>and my personal favorite - Pineapple Peel
> 

Thanks for the suggestions....and if you are interested in joining the
family, you can be the Pineapple!

>Just trying to be helpful. :-)
> 
>Cristi

ThankS!
> 
>> 
>> Banana Split
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>        "The Peel Sisters --             ^   Liz Fox
>>       Emma is My Mom and Role Model     ^   Research Administrator
>>    Dave is my Uncle and Boss at the ISA ^   College of Fine Arts
>>        Is Alex My Dad?"                 ^   Carnegie Mellon University  
>>                         
>>   I'm Big Sis Banana Peel (Narna Split) ^   lf01@andrew.cmu.edu
>>     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> 
> 
Bannie
From: lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu (Liz Fox)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: KL: Season Finale
Date: 13 Apr 92 13:34:14 GMT
	<10APR199208500395@utkvx3.utk.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: Office of the Dean - CFA, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

On 10-Apr-92 in Re: KL: Season Finale        
user schwinge, angela m@utkvx writes:
>>Anne preggers???????????  What a hoot.  Oh boy oh boy oh boy.
>> 
>What a shock but where did Greg go?  
> 


I am almost positive that Greg has Meg.  When Meg waved - we never sawe
who she waved to - I'm sure that's why Greg doesn't want anyone to knoe
where he is.

-Liz
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: cjaeger@bogart.uucp (Cecilia Jaeger)
Subject: SB: Need Old Update
Organization: ism:c:m/xo
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 11:18:03 GMT

Hi Everyone,

	Well somehow are connection to the Net has been down for weeks. I am
glad it is back. I know I missed some great talk. 

	Will the Net was down I was in the process of moving into my first
house. :-) So, in the process of moving I forgot to set the VCR and I missed
Santa Barbara on Monday March 30.  Please someone tell me what happen at the
rest of the reunion and what (please please) happened with Cassie, Angela and
Warren. I've been dying to know. I couldn't get to the net. If you can't give
me a complete update, just summarize the Cassie, Angela and Warren storyline.


		Thanks in Advance
	
			Ceci "the homeowner" 
-- 
C. Jaeger  IRS - Washington DC                  
Internet: cjaeger@bogart.UUCP  
UUCP: ..uunet!media!ka3ovk!irscscm!bogart!cjaeger
Ladies and Gentlemen: Take my advice pull down your pants and slide on the ice.
				Sidney Freeman - M*A*S*H
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: GC.AVW@forsythe.stanford.edu (RAGIN CAJUN)
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: M.E.K. News
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 10:25:02 GMT

>In article <1992Apr7.121124.26886@unx.sas.com> alex@donne.unx.sas.com (Alexandra Bost) writes:
>>From the April 13th issue of _People_:
>>
>>"Michael Knight, 32, best known for playing Tad Martin on
>>the ABC soap _All My Children_, will wed actress Catherine
>>Hickland, 36, sometime this fall.  Hickland was previously
>>married to David Hasselhoff, who's character on TV's
>>_Knight Rider_ was named, yes, Michael Knight..."
>
>>Alex
>>--
>>  @                                | Alexandra Bost
>> \|/                               |
>>  O <----The Bostling              | alex@unx.sas.com   (work)
>>_/ \_    (appearing July 1st!)     | alex@catt.ncsu.edu (play)


Alex-

I posted the same thing when the first post came out about who he was engaged
to, in fact I posted it as a question, but received no answer.  Well, so much
for the idea that anyone reads my posts, makes a person want to become a lurker.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
<>Alma Woolf-Ahwoooo-I mean baa-baa-<>
<>Sam the Sham and the Pharaohs<><><>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo)
Subject: Re: KL:Season Finale
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 18:41:29 GMT

In article <21201@hacgate.UUCP> bickle@mitchell.hac.com (Vanessa Bickle) writes:
>
>Since you brought up last week: Did anybody here catch the symbolism when
>Paige walked in on Greg watching the videos. The picture over the fireplace
>(which just happened to be lighted) was centered between them in the shot.
>This was the picture that Paige bought Greg after Laura died and he got mad
>at Paige because she took the one down that Laura bought. Eventually, we
>knew Greg was getting over Laura(we thought) because he moved Laura's
>painting and put up Paige's. Greg obviously hasn't redecorated in awhile.

I immediately keyed into the painting on the wall to see if he still 
had Paige's painting up -- it's quite interesting, I think.  I hope 
they get Paige and Greg together but I also hope he stays away from the 
office so they can build up on the rivalry between Paige and Claudia -- 
that was very entertaining.  I wonder if he put some sort of an "out" 
in the deal so he can take back over the company if he feels like it.

>I did have a fleeting idea. What if the pregnancy kit that anne was looking
>at was one she had found in paige's apartment?? Just a thought.

Ooooh, I hadn't thought of this.  Although, now that I think about it a 
little more, I guess they might have noticed something when she was in 
the hospital, eh?  Seems like if she'd been pregnant before she got 
shot, she'd have lost the baby -- or they wouldn't have been able to 
operate because of it or something.

Joanna.

*  \____ ----- ____/            *  The University of Texas at Austin  *
*       ( o o )                 *   Petroleum Engineering Department  *
*        \   /   Gus-ball!!     *           (512) 471-3229            *
*         (_)  Hook 'em Horns!  *    peea224@hermes.chpc.utexas.edu   *
From: stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Cat Stanton)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Dani and Dem Strawberries
Date: 11 Apr 92 09:45:40 GMT
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens

In article <1992Apr11.062543.16189@chpc.utexas.edu> peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo) writes:
>In article <1992Apr10.175926.19891@csun.edu> vectrgsj@VAX.CSUN.EDU writes:
>
>>>Deborah Moore acted very well in this scene and I felt like the tears
>>>were real.  Compare this to Icky's tears earlier [yesterday?] which were
>>>VERY fake.  Someone should tell Staci that when the makeup guy comes and
>>>squirts water in your eye it means you are supposed to be crying.  She
>>>was like just standing there with water streaming down her face, but 
>>>didn't act like a person that was crying.  Oh well.
>>
>>Sorry, I didn't find Isabella's crying scene unbelievable.
>
>Me, either.  Nyah, nyah!  :-p
>
Now, I thought Isabella rivaled Shawn Douglas in acting skill for that
one.  WAY TOO MUCH water and she looked fine to me.  Sorry to disagree,
but she could have done better.  Not saying I wanted forhead or face
contortion like Carly, but SOMETHING.

Cat Stanton
UGA/UCNS
From: jxo@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AW: Wrath of Lorna
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:38:43 EST
Followup-To: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Distribution: na,rec
Organization: Cornell University

In article <241@pyrtor.UUCP>,
illya@pyrtor.UUCP (Illya Barnett) writes: 
> In article <1992Mar31.134030.6462@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> saj@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (john.suravlas) writes:
> 
> When I see Jamie, the term "camel-face" comes to mind.  It was so
> totally inappropriate for him to barge in on Jake and Paulina.  What
> makes him so perfect anyway?  Wasn't he sleeping around with Vicki when
> he was supposed to be in love with Lisa? (I'm probably wrong about that
> one, but I can't stand this Jamie)
>>

No, you are not wrong, he DID do this.  THEN everyone got pissed off
at Vicky because she slept with Jake AFTER Jamie had left her to go back
to Lisa.  (Yes she lied aboutbeing sure Jamie was the father, among many
other things.... but a 
considerable amount of the badmouthing she got from Jamie, Amanda, and
others was because she slept with someone other than Jamie, No double
standards here)  Often the Cory's seem to go off on these holier than thou
tirades.  Even Rachel.       


>>I like the new character Kelsey. She is beautiful and very talented. If
>>they must keep this Jamie, I'd rather see him with Kelsey. I take that
>>back - Kelsey deserves much better.
>>
>>John

True, but at least then there won't be two holier than thou types together,
in our face all the time.  And there seem to be some sparks.


On a side note, since this was originally about Lorna,  I think that Rachel,
who I usually think has a clue, really missed the boat where Lorna is 
concerned.  A while ago, someone (I don't remember who)  told her
that Lorna was just insecure.  Rachel replied with, "that's the LAST thing
Lorna is." (or a very similar sentiment)

Lorna is a great character, I'm glad they are keeping her.  If she gets
out  of this mess, how are they going to get her out of the counterfeiting
scandal and her connections with Carl Hutchins?  She finally mentioned
her "family" the other day, are they laying the groundwork for her being
Felicia's and Lucas's daughter?  It would sure be interesting....


-Kimberly 

(kimberly@chemres.tn.cornell.edu)

  
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kelsey@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Chris Kelsey)
Subject: AMC:  TAN:  Marital Names
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1992 09:35:55 GMT

Lori Cotton writes:

>Hey everybuddy!  I'm back and we did it!  I am now Mrs. Lori Jane Smith
>Moore Cotton.  (Uh oh, beginning to get a long last name like Erica).

And Ellon Schnaible says:

> Congrats Mrs. Cotton!  I only have 17 days left as Miss. Schnaible!!!
>   Ellon (soon to be St. Croix)

Then Kimberly Heller adds:
> I only have 23 days left as Miss Heller!!
>   Kimberly  (soon to be Louie)

just a question (along with best wishes!) to y'all:  why the name changes?
and why the Mrs./Miss instead of Ms.?  perhaps you've asked Messrs. Cotton,
St. Croix and Louie if they would like to change instead?? ;)

i don't mean this to be political so much as practical -- seems to me that 
it might be more practical for Erica to remain legally Erica Kane, though
for social purposes she could grit her teeth and be "Mrs. Adam Chandler."
Just think of the legal fees every time the corporate officer changes her
name, not to mention the havoc with the IRS...

chris "i need to remember how to look myself up in the phone book" kelsey
.
From: keb3@po.CWRU.Edu (Keith E. Bitely)
Subject: Re: GL: Survey Information
Reply-To: keb3@po.CWRU.Edu (Keith E. Bitely)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 05:12:56 GMT


These are my votes:

In a previous article, dls7515@summa.tamu.edu (SMITH, DARRON L) says:

>FAVORITE FEMALE CHARACTER:

Alexandra Spaulding

>FAVORITE MALE CHARACTER:

Frank Cooper

>FAVORITE COUPLE:

Harley Cooper & AC Mallet

>PRETTIEST FEMALE:

Eleni Spaulding

>MOST HANDSOME MALE:

AC Mallet

>RATE THE ACTING ABILITY:
>Put a G (Great), A (Average), or a P (Poor) next to the following names of GL

>Beverley McKinsey (Alex)        G
>Maureen Garett (Holly)          A
>Beth Ehlers (Harley)            A
>Sherry Stringfeild (Blake)      A
>Kimberley Simms (Mindy)         G
>Mark Derwin (Mallet)            G
>Michael Zaslow (Roger)          A
>Vincient Irazary (Nick)         G
>Tina Sloan (Lilian)             G
>Jordan Clarke (Billy)           A
>Rick Hearst (A-M)               G
>Melina Kanakaredes (Eleni)      G
>Jean Carol (Nadine)             A

Keithy
From: riddle@brahms.udel.edu (Tammy Laird)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: TAN: The Peels revisted (was Re: DOOL:  Comments...)
Date: 8 Apr 92 13:02:26 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

In article <1992Apr8.121903.13981@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:
>
>Ooh Tammy, you little back-stabber you.  I guess Monday night meant 
>nothing to you, eh?  I'm hurt, very very hurt.  And dear Vickie, I 
>didn't mean to call you a "hag", it was a typo, I meant to say uh....
>forget it.  :-)
>

AWWWWW, Timmers, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to hurt your feelings.  Your
wrong, Monday night meant everything to me--when can we do it again? (wink,
wink).  Hold on.....whew, that was close....you know, Tim, it is very easy
to fall under your spell.  Talk about seduction, you pull the little broken
heart act just so I'll become your next net woman. :-)  What number would I
be?  Is it 10 or 11? :-) :-)


>
>
>I think Vickie and Tammy must be the evil twins too.  I bet they are
>closely related to Vince, yeah, that's it.  They are triplets, Vick 
>and Tammy from one zygote and Vince from another.  [I hope my usage of
>zygote was correct.  :-) ]

Tim, wasn't it you that was supporting Vince against my Lemon twin the
other day?  If so, Lemon Pledge, look out.  He is trying to play us against
each other.
 


>
>
>Ok now, let's all go back to playing nice. <?>  The "hag" comment was only
>appropiate in the birthday week and that is over.  Besides, I've redeemed
>myself, as Vickie will soon see.  :-)  Look out Bill!
>


Ok, I'll play nice, if you will.


>-- 
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
>|  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
>|  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |




--Peach Pit
From: christil@uts.amdahl.com (Christine Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: KL - who's pregnant?
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:18:59 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1992Apr15.131352.22883@cbfsb.cb.att.com>,
mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes: 
> In article <1992Apr15.121044.21363@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
jackie8@dasher.uucp (25853-brady) writes: 

> >I don't think it's impossible to think that Anne could still
> >have a baby.  Isn't she supposed to be around 40something in age?
> 
> For what it's worth, Michelle Phillips is 47.  I suppose Anne could
> be more like 40-42, which would certainly make pregnancy possible.
> Look at Murphy Brown!  :-)  
>
> |  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
> |  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
> |  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |

Well, Paige was 21 a couple seasons ago (on the show).  Remember when
Tom Ryan made some reference to her having such a high position in the
company at age 21?  Anyway, considering she's about 23 now (on the
show), and if Anne had her when she was, say, 23 (?), that would make
Anne about 46 on the show.  I don't think Anne is the one who is
pregnant.  I think it would make the show more exciting if Paige is
the one who is pregnant.  What do you all think?

-- 

Christine Lee                           Amdahl Corp. 	
christil@uts.amdahl.com                 Santa Clara, CA   

----------------------------------------------------------
  "Suppose that you were an idiot and suppose you were a 
   member of Congress.  But I repeat myself."
                                            --Mark Twain
----------------------------------------------------------
From: stapleto@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Kathy Stapleton)
Subject: DOOL -- Drake 
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 05:07:33 GMT


     To Kim Vick:

     I don't know what I can do about the updates :) since it does
take lots of time to do ...and I know what you mean when you say that
sometimes you don't have time to watch.....  but maybe if people plead
enough :)?

     Did you go to GORGEOUS (Gosh, I drool every time I think about
him) Drake's PA in the mall?  Hmmmmmm./...how did you hear about this?
I didn't see it listed in SOW or any of the soap rags?

	What was Drake doing..signing autographs?  You gotta give us a
detailed update about your visit with Drake if you went!!!! :)

     --A serious Drake DrOOLer who visited him two weeks in a
row...along with Peach Pit! :) :)