HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nss3@kimbark.uchicago.edu (Noel Steere)
Subject: Re: Regarding the proposed Fielder FAQ
Reply-To: nss3@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 01:33:49 GMT

In article <2zkn-9@lynx.unm.edu> kbos@carina.unm.edu (Kurt Bose "of Biscayzee") writes:
>In article <24479@oasys.dt.navy.mil> hambric@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Stephen Hambric) writes:
>>Why in the world would you guys write a Fielder FAQ summary?
>>You people *live* for arguments like these.  One mention of Fielder's
>>alleged RBI prowess, and stathead keyboards start flying from kneejerk
>>impacts.  We'd take away all your fun if Fielder was banished as a topic
>>of discussion (along with Ripken being tired in September, Jack Morris
>>being a 'money' pitcher, sportswriters actually knowing something about
>>baseball, ...)
>>
>>We non-statheads are the Yin to your Yang.  Without our (allegedly)
>>outrageous and statistically incorrect observations, the discussions
>>in this newsgroup would be a lot less lively.
>>
>
>Hey, Steve, remind me to explain to you the concept of a "joke" sometime.

Oh, I don't know.  "Make outs, not walks" could become the mantra of
the nineties :-).

Noel Steere                  |...of the Dave Rossing fan club
GM/Manager, New York Knights |Knights' Run Total: 467 Runs in 93 games
Internet Baseball League     |Projected Season Total: 813  Target: 1000!
nss3@midway.uchicago.edu     |HECTOR VILLANUEVA FOR PRESIDENT
                             |(Heck, the Cubs sure aren't using him!)
                             |OMAR VIZQUEL FOR VICE-PRESIDENT
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: kaufman@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Ken Kaufman)
Subject: Re: BLOCKBUSTER TRADE!
Summary: When it absolutely, positively needs to get there overnight
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 13:14:06 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.052431.16927@leland.Stanford.EDU> claudius@leland.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu) writes:
>>The A's traded Jose Canseco to Texas for Ruben Sierra, Bobby Witt, and
>>Jeff Russell.

>I think it's an excellent deal for Texas.

Yes, and if Jose drives to Kansas City, he can report to the Rangers in
time for tonight's game.

==Ken
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: claudius@leland.stanford.edu (Nelson Lu)
Subject: RC/27 for Cs
Organization: DSG, Stanford University
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 21:27:27 GMT

NATIONAL LEAGUE
Darren Daulton, Philadelphia	8.52
Don Slaught, Pittsburgh		6.96
Mike LaValliere, Pittsburgh	4.81
Joe Oliver, Cincinnati		4.41
Greg Olson, Atlanta		4.35
Carlos Hernandez, Los Angeles	4.30
Tom Pagnozzi, St. Louis		4.04
NL AVERAGE			3.95
Benito Santiago, San Diego	3.76
Joe Girardi, Chicago		3.75
Kirt Manwaring, San Francisco	3.70
Damon Berryhill, Atlanta	3.63
Gary Carter, Montreal		3.42
Darrin Fletcher, Montreal	3.16
Mike Scioscia, Los Angeles	3.04
Eddie Taubensee, Houston	2.96
Todd Hundley, New York		2.95
Scott Servais, Houston		1.79

AMERICAN LEAGUE
Chris Hoiles, Baltimore		7.55
Mickey Tettleton, Detroit	6.58
Terry Steinbach, Oakland	6.11
Brian Harper, Minnesota		5.49
Ivan Rodriguez, Texas		4.85
Pat Borders, Toronto		4.64
Mike Macfarlane, Kansas City	4.33
AL AVERAGE			4.07
Jeff Tackett, Baltimore		4.05
Matt Nokes, New York		3.91
B. J. Surhoff, Milwaukee	3.77
Dave Valle, Seattle		3.72
Ron Karkovice, Chicago		3.42
Sandy Alomar, Cleveland		3.30
Mike Fitzgerald, California	3.21
Tony Pena, Boston		3.20

===============================================================================
GO CALIFORNIA ANGELS!
===============================================================================
Nelson Lu (claudius@leland.stanford.edu)
From: zuhars@madrone.eecs.ucdavis.edu (Gary Bubble Bubble Huckabay)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Lies, Damn Lies, & Statistics (was Re: The Monthly Cecil Fielder Thread
Date: 3 Sep 92 18:46:40 GMT
Organization: Jose Canseco Fan Club (Arlington Chapter)

(Paul "Protoplasm is a Way of Life" Jezioranski) writes:
>Sure. Simply idiotic. An example:
>
>	Rudy Fafoofnik: 680 Plate appearances, 1.000 SLG, 1.000 OBP
>	
>......	but he scored zero runs because he hit 680 two out singles and the guy
>	behind him struck out 680 times.

Well, sport, how does this support your position?  Sounds to me like
Rudy's a hell of a ballplayer, and you have COMPLETE stiffs around
him, always making outs.  It's not his fault he scored zero runs, and
drove in zero.  (I assume.)

Sounds to me like Rudy's pretty much Jehovah waiting to happen.  Is he
a free agent this year?  If anything, this is a thorn in the side of
your own argument, since Rudy's 0 runs are the direct results of inept
teammates - not his own hitting prowess.

Which is what we've kind of been saying about RBIs for ages.

Can I be Rudy's agent?

>My
>contention is that adding external dependencies (such as who and how
>many were in scoring position, who was pitching, etc) only complicates
>things

And yet you like RBI as a stat?  Are you claiming that RBI are NOT
dependent upon who hits in front of you?  If so, I would be very
interested in seeing some evidence to that effect.  By nature, RBI
adds these complications because it is largely dependent upon the
offensive performance of those who hit before the player in question.

Do you disagree with this?  If so, why?

+-----------------+
| August 31, 1992 |
+-----------------+

{33}


-- 
*   Gary Huckabay   * "So what percentage of it is imbeciles, idiots, morons,  *
* "Played 36 games  *  and other wastes of skin?"  "Currently about 25% of the *
*    in 32 days."   *  posters, and 50% of the posts."  "Have you considered   *
* "Shoulder? Me???" *  aerial spraying?" "I think Sherri has.  I'll ask."      *
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy)
Subject: Re: Blockbuster trade
Keywords: Canseco, Sierra, Witt, Russel
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 04:39:17 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.040424.13081@cs.cornell.edu> tedward@cs.cornell.edu (Edward [Ted] Fischer) writes:
>
>But what will Oakland look like next year?  Their free agents include
>Ruben Sierra, Mike Moore, Dave Stewart, Jeff Russell, Mark McGwire,
>Ron Darling, Terry Steinbach, Harold Baines, Rick Honeycutt, Gene
>Nelson, Willie Wilson, Kelly Downs, Carney Lansford, Randy Ready,
>Jamie Quirk, and Rich Gossage.
>
>That's 16 players from the 25 man roster.  Two thirds of the team!
>It'll be a fun winter in Oakland!
>

It certainly looks like someone in Oakland was preparing for the
expansion draft...

Gerald
From: jwc@netx.com (Jeff Comer)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Trading Deadline
Date: 3 Sep 92 19:11:29 GMT
Organization: The Chaos Bobs

binkley@epas.utoronto.ca (P. Binkley) writes:
>Cone cleared waivers at the beginning of August.  I seems every team
>places several players on revocable waivers then, and other teams
>think they'll never be traded so they don't bother to claim them.
>They asked Brewers GM Sal Bando about Cone; he said, "At that time
>Toronto didn't look like they needed any more pitching.  Besides, if
>you make a claim for a player, you risk the possibility that the club
>would tell you that he's yours.  In Cone's case, that would have meant
>inheriting about a third of his 1992 salary [$4.25 million US].  Our
>club already is committed to paying out more dollars than we should be
>and Baltimore just blew their wad for Cal Ripken Jr."

Well don't forget that "wad" is their 1993 "wad". Cal is still making
around $2M a year, well short of the $6M or so he stands to make. And
yes, this is a big Chunk 'O Cash, enough to choke a stable of horses.
The O's could have still made an offer for Cone and coughed up $1.4M
for 5 or 6 good starts. Is it worth it? Well, if those 6 other starts
result in 'x' losses, and if the O's finish less than 'x' games behind
the Jays, then it's worth it.

Personally, I think they should have gone for Maddux. He's available,
at least for the balance of the 1992 season. And how much would he have
cost? $1M or so? Instead, they traded for Lefferts, giving up an unknown
AA pitcher and the proverbial PTBNL.

Another poster wrote about the politicising of the waivers and trade
business. This cannot be underestimated. GM's cannot just keep claiming 
the David Cones and Jeff Kents of the world off of waivers in order to 
keep them off of the top dog in their division. If they did, they would
never complete another deal.

--
Jeffrey W Comer * jwc@netx.com * 703-749-2369 (v) * 703-749-2375 (fax)
"We will, we will, rock you!" -George Bush (U-2)
From: hbrooks@uiatma.atmos.uiuc.edu (Harold_Brooks)
Subject: Re: OH! Sherri won't like this. (Re: Sierra to be traded?)
Organization: NSSL
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 14:26:33 GMT

In article <1992Aug26.133159.3846@cs.cornell.edu> tedward@cs.cornell.edu (Edward [Ted] Fischer) writes:
>In article <BtLDwB.E9z@news.cso.uiuc.edu> hbrooks@uiatma.atmos.uiuc.edu (Harold_Brooks) writes:
>>
>>Something that complicates the issue for the Rangers even more is their
>>shortstop situation.  There's no one on the major league roster you'd 
>>want to start '93 with.
>
>What about Huson?  He's not great, but he is a pretty good fielder (I
>think) and is in his prime.  His career .600 OPS might scare you, but
>it isn't *that* bad for a shortstop.  And he is hitting for a .700+
>OPS this year.  He even has speed on the basepaths (17-5 SB/CS
>record).
>
>And the Rangers still have rights to Dickie Thon, if they want him.

They shouldn't want him, but who knows?:-)

I'll stand corrected on Huson.  My pessimism about the situation in OKC may 
have made me a little harsh on Huson, but I'm not convinced the Rangers
are that high on him.  Your assessment of him is accurate--28, slightly
above average DA, hasn't hit much until this year.  I think Tom Grieve
may view this year as a fluke.  There are a number of holes on the Ranger
ball club and I don't know if major league shortstop is at the top of
my list (although there isn't anyone on the farm who looks like they'll
help), but there are all the signs of a major shake-up in Arlington.
Gonzalez, Rodriguez, and Palmer are safe.  I don't know if anyone else is.

Harold
-- 
Harold Brooks                    hbrooks@uiatma.atmos.uiuc.edu
National Severe Storms Laboratory/CIMMS (Norman, OK)
Andres Galarraga (Through 25 August)  .235 BA  .367 SLG  .277 OBA
27 H away from .300  8 HBP  9 BB
From: csquared@coos.dartmouth.edu (C Squared)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Gold Glove at short (was Re: simulation games)
Date: 25 Aug 92 17:52:29 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Originator: csquared@coos.dartmouth.edu

In article <1992Aug25.152943.7369@trentu.ca> pyacm@trentu.ca (A Colin Morton) writes:
>In article <1992Aug25.055800.12553@midway.uchicago.edu> nss3@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>>
>>Now that I think about it, Vizquel might have a good chance of winning
>>the gold glove this year (thus almost assuring him of getting a 1 in
>>Strat :-).  Think about it: Guillen's out for the year, Ripken isn't
>>hitting well enough to be a lock :-), and I can't think of anyone else
>>aside from Vizquel who would be considered. 
>>
>Manny Lee, the most underrated shortstop in the game?
>
Greg Gagne.

C (Kirsched 'Cubed') Squared
From: gritter@cs.purdue.EDU (Carl R. Gritter)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Delino DeShields and Sean Berry
Date: 31 Aug 92 14:08:25 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University

In article  <1992Aug31.061720.6678@cbfsb.cb.att.com> sager@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (mike.r.sager) writes:
>
>I understand Delino DeShields left Friday's game with a strained muscle.
>Anyone know how serious the injury is and how long he's expected to be
>out?  Thanks for any info.

Strained rib cage muscles.  Supposed to be out a few days.  Hopefully
not too long.  The Expos need him for any chance to win the NL East.

BTW, anybody know anything about 3B Sean Berry and P Archie Corbin?
The Expos picked up these two from the KC organization for P Bill
Sampen and P Chris Haney.  

Carl
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball,rec.sport.baseball.fantasy,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
From: dave@silver.sni.ca (Dave Till)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Jays Remaining Schedule
Date: 27 Aug 92 13:38:20 GMT
Organization: People Baffled By Todd Stottlemyre, Inc.

In article <1992Aug24.162213.2122@merrimack.edu> desmondw@merrimack.edu writes:
>Hi,
>    I'm looking for the Blue Jays schedule for the remainder of the
>season. It doesn't have to be a complete, detailed day-by-day
>schedule, But just a list of teams the Jays have to play until the 
>end of the season and whether they are on home turf or not. Thanks.
>Oh,and BTW, Who has a tougher scedule down the road? The O's or the Jays?

The remainder of the Jays' schedule:

Aug 27-30:  Mil, home
Aug 31-Sept 2:  Chi, home
Sept 4-6: Minn, home
Sept 7-9: KC, away
Sept 11-13: Tex, away
Sept 14-17: Clev, home
Sept 18-20: Tex, home
Sept 22-24: Balt, away
Sept 25-27: NY, away
Sept 29-30, Bos, home
Oct 2-4, Det, home

There is one rainout makeup date as well (I don't know when it is).

The Jays have 7 home series (22 games) remaining, and only 4 series
(12 games) away.

I don't know Baltimore's schedule, except that I know that they have
a West Coast swing still to come.  The O's have been at home for awhile,
so I think they have more road games remaining than the Jays do.
-- 
--Dave Till ("dave@silver.sni.ca", or try "dave@snitor.uucp"; as a last resort,
try "dwtill@watyew.waterloo.edu").  * My Canada includes the World Series. *
"Take it from me, a veteran.  The indicators of mental health in this country
are sleeping habits, hair length and beards." -- from *Whale Music*
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: rickert@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (John H. Rickert)
Subject: Re: Origin of "Did he (they) win?"
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 16:46:15 GMT


In article <10010675@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> mjs@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Marc Sabatella)  
writes:
> In rec.sport.baseball, kettler@pierre.mit.edu (KETTLER, THOMAS R.) writes:
> > In article <1992Aug19.191431.9455@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>,  
paula@koufax.cv.hp.com (Paul Andresen)      writes...
> > > 
> > >It may be apocryphal, but supposedly when Don Drysdale was once informed  
that
> > >Koufax had pitched a no-hitter his first question was "Did he win?"
> > 
> > I remember a similar expression differently. It was about the Amazin'  
Mets of 
> > 1962. In one game they scored something like 17 runs. When a fan was told  
about 
> > the number of runs they score, he asked "Did they win?" At least, I  
remember 
> > seeing this in a Baseball Digest.
> 
> I heard this story somewhat differently - I think it was regarding a  
no-hitter,
> but I don't think it was Koufax.

I recall hearing about another '60's pitcher also. 
I think it was Jim Maloney who had a no-hitter through 9 and lost 
in extra innings. Later that year (I think) he threw anotherr one, 
prompting the "Did he win?" dialogue.
Or, maybe some sportswriter just made it up (like that'd be a first...)

john rickert
rickert@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: dougb@comm.mot.com (Doug Bank)
Subject: Re: CUB'S MADDUX EASY CHOICE FOR CY
Reply-To: dougb@ecs.comm.mot.com
Organization: Motorola Land Mobile Products Sector
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:12:36 GMT

In article <1992Sep3.051537.719@sunb10.cs.uiuc.edu>, epstein@sparc9.cs.uiuc.edu (Milt Epstein) writes:

|> So, if the statement above about how many HR's have been hit in
|> Wrigley this year is in fact true, that lends credence to the
|> hypothesis that conditions there have been more favorable for pitchers
|> this year.  And as to it being just one piece of evidence, the fact
|> that the Cubs pitchers' ERAs are so low is in fact another piece of
|> evidence supporting this hypothesis (and it is equally plausible, if
|> not more so, than the hypothesis that the Cubs' pitchers have been
|> pitching great this year).

Saturday the wind blew out.  There were 6 home runs.
Sunday the wind blew out.  Bullinger pitched a 1 hitter.

-- 
Doug Bank                       Private Systems Division
dougb@ecs.comm.mot.com          Motorola Communications Sector
dougb@nwu.edu                   Schaumburg, Illinois
dougb@casbah.acns.nwu.edu       708-576-8207                    
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: thurston@phyast.nhn.uoknor.edu (Tad Thurston)
Subject: Re: AL-pennant race.
Originator: usenet@kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 03:51:39 GMT
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan ) writes:


>The AL-pennant race shows some interesting points. The top
>3 teams in the East, the Jays, Oriloes and the Brewers are
>playing at the same pace as the second & third teams in the
>West, the Twins & the White-Sox.  The Twins, the Sox, the Jays
>Orioles and the Brewers are having similar percentage wins
>from the same number of games played so far this season.

>Which only means this: the Oakland Atletics are on a tear.

>S.H
yeah, except that the O's just swept 'em!!!!!!!

YYYYEEEEESSSSSSSSS!!!!!!


Tad "Flanagan for the Cy Young" Thurston
From: luigi@bullpen.csd.sgi.com (Randy Palermo)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Collusion or Sanity?
Date: 2 Sep 92 21:42:45 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA

In this mornings paper it was reported that the San Diego Padres, in the
midst of a pennant race, have admitted to trading Craig Lefferts purely
for economic reasons. They would have had to go over budget to sign him 
and didn't feel that was in their best interests.

Some Thoughts:

Could this be the start of a trend in baseball? Some big name players have
changed teams recently, not an odd occurance in an of itself, and their
teams have not received much in return. 

With the failures of the Dodgers and Mets, could the owners finally be 
coming to the realization that you cannot Buy a pennant? 

With the uncertainties of the new TV contract looming, will the owners 
be willing to shell out the kind of money that they have in the past?

Will the large number of quality free agents available this year dilute
the market and actually send salaries down?

Could all of this lead to further collusion charges or will the owners
be viewed as adding some sanity to the process?

luigi
--
Randy Palermo   luigi@csd.sgi.com    Fax: (415)961-6502
Silicon Graphics Computer Systems, 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd Mt. View, CA 94039
"Play an accordion, go to jail. That's the LAW"
From: gt6930a@prism.gatech.EDU (LEHDE,KEVIN VAL)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Braves Minor Leaguers (was Re: 15 to protect)
Date: 3 Sep 92 17:31:27 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <Btysw3.IDF@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> dwarner@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (David J.) writes:
>     Another player from the Braves' system who looks really good is Mike
>Hostetler, a 21-year-old RHP from Marietta, Ga. This is only his second season
>in pro ball, so he won't be snatched up from the system.  It's a good thing,
>too, because he pitched two shutouts for Durham before being called up, then
>gave up one earned run on four hits in six innings in his first Greenville
>outing.  He told the papers the next day he had a "really bad game."  This kid
>will be the fourth man in the rotation by 1994.

Hostetler was a player at Georgia Tech from 1987-1991.  He and Brent Colson 
were the aces of the staff during the same time that Andy Bruce was looking 
like the biggest slugger this side of the Pacific, until Mr. Bruce was arrested
at the NCAA's.  Hostetler's biggest problem, that I saw, was his control.  He
had a good fastball and big-breaking slider.  He won at least 10 games during
his last two years.








-- 
Kevin Lehde
Lover of cats, the stage, the female form, Toonces K. Templeton, 
the Incredible Hulk, college football (as a sport), Meloni, volleyball,
the Braves, Digger, God, sleeping in, and a rollicking good time.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: hasch@jhuvms.hcf.jhu.edu (Bruce M Hasch)
Subject: Re: Cubs: Maddux, REALLY hard loser
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University - HCF
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 21:56:00 GMT

In article <BtnzpF.385@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, bharat@cs.uiuc.edu writes...
> 
>Poor Greg Maddux -- at 15-10.  I heard an absolutely amazing stat
>yesterday; in his 10 losses, the Cubs have scored a  TOTAL OF 3 RUNS.
>7 shutouts, and 1 run thrice... I knew had some hard luck, but this is
>incredible..
> 
>Jeez, give the poor guy some offense, and he would be 20-3..
> 
>Do you suppose it could be a plot on the Cubbies part to deflate his
>W/L so that they will be able to resign him... Just a thought.
>Anyway, since that would be actually smart, it guarantees that the
>Cubs didn't do it..........

Nahhhh.  I think General Manangers of Major League Baseball clubs know
that Maddux is a premier pitcher, he still has a great ERA in a horrible
pitcher's park, and is among the most durable pitchers in baseball.

I've heard rumors that Maddux is angry at the Cubs organization for some
reason, but I don't have any details.

Of course, the Orioles could use him, and given the price of Cone, we should
be able to get Maddux for Bill Ripken and a few bushels of blue crabs...

> 
>Add smileys please..
> 

Add a few for me, too...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce 'Slower than Sam Horn' Hasch            Hemond: Do SOMETHING!!
hasch@jhuvms.hcf.jhu.edu                      O's all the Way in '92???
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: pcaster@mizar.usc.edu (Dodger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Pirates Wakefield Outduels Dodgers Candiotti
Date: 26 Aug 1992 22:42:14 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: mizar.usc.edu

In the battle of knuckleball pitchers, Wakefield bested
Candiotti, who showed no ill effects of his recent injury.
The Dodgers mounted no offense against Wakefield.  Offerman
did single and reach third with no outs, yet Wakefield pitched
out of that jam.  Lind made several great defensive plays, 
in particular was one where he robbed Scioscia of what looked
like a sure single.  Not only did Lind go way into the hole, he leapt
up to throw the ball and landed in the outfield behind the shortstop
position.  It was unbelievable.

The Dodgers only had 6 hits off Wakefield, who went the distance
for his fourth win.  Candiotti gave up 9 hits and 2 runs
in his 6 innings of work.  Jim Gott pitched two perfect innings
and Jay Howell did likewise in the 9th.  They had 6 strikeouts
against the 9 batters they faced.  Gott in particular seemed
to benefit by following Candiotti.  It must be real tough for
hitters to adjust to a real hard fast ball after 6 innings
of knuckleballs.

				BleedsDodgerBlue

Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: kbos@carina.unm.edu (Kurt Bose "of Biscayzee")
Subject: Re: The Monthly Cecil Fielder Thread
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 15:08:31 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

Yep, this is going into the FAQ.  

-- 
Kurt Bose (as in Daisy, not Rose) - kbos@carina.unm.edu - I'm not the AntiChrist
I AM the AntiWoofer. - Junior Stathead{tm} - I'm a shutmouthed, selfless idiot!!
Latest Attempted Compiler of the R.S.BB FAQ - Now Accepting Submissions...(hint)
Have you hugged a Dan Gladden fan today? - Dave Rossing : .531/54/214 at Denver!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball