HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: orson@bluemoon.rn.com (Craig Smith)
Subject: Re: Buckaroo Banzai (was Darkman - Crap)
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[024])
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 21:58:24 EDT

> If you mean `is BB based on a comic book?', the answer's no -- the comic
> books, the records, the Saturday morning radio show -- they're all
> fabricated allusions.  Part of what makes this film such a gem is how
> these subtle references feed the mystique of the characters' folk-hero
> status, embedded in the mass public's consciousness ...
> 
     Frankly, I was very dissapointed at BB, because the humor in it was
     told three levels deep.  That is to say, they were telling inside
     jokes without having already established an inside!
     I wanted BB to be a campy satire of SF movies, but the comic book
     adaptation (which I read first) was campier than the movie. 
     Example:
       Th line was in the comic, not the movie:
     "Youre going to the eighth dimension? Well, what about the fifth,
     sixth, and seventh?"
     "I guess they don't matter."

     For campy SF (ohh, I'm going to get blasted for this [cringe])
     Howard the Duck (yes, the movie!) has it all over BB.  HtheD was
     what BB should have been.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: Craig E. Smith      "Life is a fulltime occupation" -- Gene Kallman ::
:: Columbus, Ohio                                                      ::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer)
Subject: Re: Opinions on Terry Gilliam
Reply-To: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer)
Organization: The John Fluke Mfg. Co.  /a.k.a. The Gizmonics Institute/
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 17:45:23 GMT

In <1992Apr2.190150.15695@mahendo.jpl.nasa.gov> reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov (Peter Reiher) writes:

>He then had a reputation of a spendthrift
>who was uncooperative - not the best reputation to have, in Hollywood.

It seems to be shared by others.  When watching the documentary on Handmade
Films, there were a number of interviews with Gilliam's ex-Pythonites who
had done films with him, and for a published documentary, they were pretty
negative.  No-one out-and-out slam him, but they didn't make it sound like
it was fun to work with him on some of his projects.  (Eric Idle did a few
jibes, then said (with a Hollywood lilt), "He's a wonderful person, really.
I just had lunch with him the other day.  *sigh*  I paid, of course..."

He certainly has made a couple of my favorite films, though.

                           "In your dreams, Fleischman."
---
                                        Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer
INTERNET:     moriarty@tc.fluke.COM
Manual UUCP:  {uunet, uw-beaver, sun, microsoft}!fluke!moriarty
CREDO:        You gotta be Cruel to be Kind...
                 **>> Keep circulating the tapes <<**

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: thomaso@centerline.com (Thomas Andrews)
Subject: Re: Will the Real Alan Hale stand up (was: The Sea Hawk questions)
Organization: CenterLine Software, Inc.
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 16:39:31 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.153854.29193@mahendo.jpl.nasa.gov> reiher@onyx.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Peter Reiher) writes:
>
>Wallace Beery was the other well
>known character actor in this film, playing, of all parts, Richard the
>Lionheart.  He wasn't bad, actually.  Who would have thought that there was 
>a role suitable for both Sean Connery and Wallace Beery?

Not to mention Anothony Hopkins ("Lion in Winter".)
--
Thomas Andrews
CenterLine Software
From: steinarb@idt.unit.no (Steinar Bang)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: T2 is crap!
Date: 17 Apr 92 12:59:26 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway

>>>>> On 14 Apr 92 13:58:35 GMT, ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz) said:

> The only reasons that the T1000 didn't kill Sarah are:

> 'We can't kill off the star'
> 'We have to leave her alive for the sequel'

Well,... they *did* kill her off in the "Beauty & the Beast" TV-series
(that's when I stopped wathcing it...;-)

- Steinar
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: andre@rurutu.wri.com (Andre Kuzniarek)
Subject: Re: Who's Spider-Man? and Highlander wanted
Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 22:02:29 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.224755.27733@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>  
sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter) writes:
> Hmmm...interesting.  Of course, just about any of these candidates are
> better choices than the actor that Cameron will be using, IMHO.

What exactly _is_ Cameron's fascination with Michael Biehn. Is MB JC's  
alter ego, did MB save Cameron's life in a war, or what? I mean, this is,  
as you say, extending into perilous miscasting...

--andre@wri.com-----------------------------------------------------------
                      "I'm tired of keepin' my cookies in the cookie jar."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ddrumm@amiganet.chi.il.us (Daniel Drumm)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Censorship of nudity (was Re: Photo of minor: is it illegal to possess?
Date: 7 Apr 92 09:21:54 GMT
Organization: Amiga Network Information Systems

wdechent@clciris.chem.umr.edu:
 
 
If you liked Natassha in Cat People, how about that wacky Malcom McDowell. the
man lives to do full frontal nudity. Witness Caligula, Clockwork Orange, Cat
People (they all start with C. Malcom McDowell, both M's. How strange.) I
think he was truly bummed out in Blue Thunder when he couldn't waggle his
willy. I can just see it, Roy Scnieder is in the final helo battle with the
nasty Bollock Malcom. Tracer bullets everywhere....suddenly....Maclom is
flying in the nude! Appy-polly-loggies viewers, our man is a buff aviator!
Jolly bad show.....
From: RHK106@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: List of Comic Book Cinema
Date: 11 Apr 92 15:26:00 GMT
Organization: Penn State University

Here is a list of all the comics-related movies I can remember:
Superman and its sequels
Batman and its sequel
Brenda Star (already made but may never be released due to red-tape stuff)
Swamp Thing and its sequel
The Punisher
Incredible Hulk  (TV movie pilot and sequels)
Captain America  (I believe it was made but I can't remember it ever being out)
Flash   (TV pilot)
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and its sequel  (I think another sequel is being
                                              made too)
Wonder Woman  (TV pilot)

Here are some movies that are being planned to be made:
Electra
X-Men
Spider-Man
Daredevil
Watchmen
Wolverine


This list is far from conclusive and most will probably never be made.  A good
magazine which will list everything you want to know about the subject is The
Comics Scene if its still being published.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: george@endeavor.intel.com (George Rachor Jr. )
Subject: Re: Jo Anne Worley
Organization: Intel Corporation , Hillsboro  OR
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 19:05:29 GMT

From article <mushens.702789707@sfu.ca>, by mushens@fraser.sfu.ca (David Russell Mushens):
> eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu (Virany Margaret Kreng) writes:
> 
>>During Beauty and the Beast, I found that the voice of the Wardrobe sounded
>>familiar and the credits listed the voice as belonging to Jo Anne Worley (sp?)
> 
>>Can anybody tell me what else she might have been in?  Her name sounds familiar
>>too but I can't seem to place the face...
> 
>>Thanx...
> 
> Actually, I think that her career centred around her appearances on
> Match Game.

And Hollywood Squares...

-- 

George Rachor Jr.
Intel Corporation
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gacohen@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Geoff A. Cohen)
Subject: Re: REVIEW: 23RD INTERNATIONAL TOURNEE OF ANIMATION
Originator: news@ernie.Princeton.EDU
Keywords: author=K.Johnson
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 07:04:16 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.152035.24476@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu (Brian L. Johnson) writes:
>
>                 23RD INTERNATIONAL TOURNEE OF ANIMATION
>                      A film review by Ken Johnson
>                       Copyright 1992 Ken Johnson
>
>I SHOULD SEE
>2:00, Holland, by Paul and Menno de Nooijer
>
>     "I Should See" is the only other film at TOURNEE by Paul and Menno
>de Nooijer.  "I Should See" is completely made up of still shots, so it
>contains no animation.  It shows what the inside of a camera sees when
>shooting a roll of film.  I am not quite sure why this film was included
>in TOURNEE considering it contains no animation.  Rating: Good
>
>Ken J.
>blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu
>
Sigh.
I think you missed the point.  IMHO, this was an ingenious
short, easily the most clever in the Tournee.  It really
explored the line between animation and "real" film

You see, think about a "real" film.  It seems that there
is motion, but there isn't.  It's just 24 fps, giving the
illusion of motion.  Just like animation.  In fact, "real"
film IS animation.  So if you animate photographs, is
it "real" or is it "animated?"

In between the photos (stills), there is some lapse of time.
There is a diagetic laspe  (i.e. within the film); there
is a extradiagetic lapse (in the viewer's domain).  This
is true of "real" film too!  But the de Nooijer's brilliantly
cut between (hah!) the boundary.

What is film?  What is animation?  Can you animate real life?

This film left me with a lot to think about, and I am
extremely glad it WAS included.

Followups by email only, please.

Geoff Cohen
Princeton University
gacohen@phoenix.princeton.edu
From: dkrause@miami.acs.uci.edu (Doug Krause)
Subject: Re: Curly Sue
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 15 Apr 92 10:17:09 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.122327.54461@cc.usu.edu> fajack@cc.usu.edu writes:
#	I just saw the moive "Curly Sue".  It is only an average movie.
#However, I would say that movie was help tremendously by the kid
#who play the main character.  She is just the cutest little kid
#you've seen.  I wonder in what other movies she has appeared in ?

I think she was Alison Porter, but this is the first I've heard of her.

Douglas Krause                      One yuppie can ruin your whole day.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
University of California, Irvine    Internet: dkrause@orion.oac.uci.edu
Welcome to Irvine:  Yuppieland USA  BITNET: DJKrause@uci.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Plug Pulled on Spike Lee's "Malcolm X"
Reply-To: reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov (Peter Reiher)
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 22:05:03 GMT

A recent article in the business section of the LA Times said that
the completion bond company has just pulled the plug on Spike Lee's
uncompleted film, "Malcolm X".  Those who have been following this
film's shooting may remember a few months back that the completion
bond company took over control of this film, when it ran $5 million
over budget.  Now, the company has gone a step further.  They have
refused to authorize any more funds to complete the film, which
has already cost $33 million.

This almost certainly doesn't mean that "Malcolm X" will not be
completed.  It's more like a bargaining ploy between Lee and the
bond company.  Lee has produced a 4 hour rough cut of "Malcolm X"
already, and was contractually obligated to produce a three hour
cut, at the longest.  The completion bond company apparently wants
a cut around 2 hours, or a little longer, believing the film will
do more business at that length.  By refusing to fund further editting,
the company probably hopes to coerce Lee into seeing things more
their way.

There was a claim that Lee's production company failed to notify the
editors of the film that they weren't being paid any more after the
production company had been officially notified by the completion bond
company.  It's hard to say who's at fault here.

My own belief is that, in the end, Lee will get to produce and release
his three hour version, but that he may have to cut a few corners in
post-production, or perhaps make salary concessions.  It would be
an artistic tragedy if the bond company did force a drastically cut 
version of the film to be released, instead of Lee's own version.

			Peter Reiher
			reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov
			. . . cit-vax!elroy!jato!jade!reiher
From: tkelsey@panix.com (Tom Kelsey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Darkman - Crap?
Date: 11 Apr 92 14:50:18 GMT
Organization: PANIX - Public Access Unix Systems of NY

In article <1863@transfer.stratus.com> jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com writes:
>In article <BM48GL.3M0@world.std.com> jspencer@world.std.com (Jeffrey C  
>Spencer) writes:
>> tfarmer@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Farmer) writes:
>> 
>> >I just saw Darkman last night, a film directed by Sam Raimi (Evil
>> >Dead)
>> >Am I the only one who thought it was crap or is this the generally
>> >accepted opinion?
>> Nope, yep.
>> 
>
>Actually, I think the answers here are Nope, nope. It is certainly
>not GENERALLY accepted as crap.  Quite a few people liked it. (At
>least one of Ebert/Siskel crew liked it as I remember, for example.)
>I thought it was OK. (Certainly better than I would have expected from
>someone who made a movie called "Evil Dead.")
>
>
 I liked it EXTREMELY well.. If you like the Genre, you are more apt
to like it. If you hate the Genre, generally you won't.  I'd like to
see the obvious  'continuing' ending continue.. even as a series on
tv.. matter of fact I think THEY are contemplating a series on it..
which ever network ran it as a movie evidently got good enough ratings
to consider it.

t
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: `Hannibal' movies
From: rivero@mdcbbs.com
Date: 9 Apr 92 13:10:20 GMT
Organization: M&E (Division of EDS), Cypress CA
Nntp-Posting-User: rivero

In article <83572@bu.edu>, nicos@csa.bu.edu (Nicos Kontopoulos) writes:
> 
>  I have heard that there have been movies about the character "Hannibal Hector"
> (Anthony Hopkins in "The Silence of the Lambs").
> 
>  If you know anything about such a movie (title, availability, etc)
> please e-mail me - rec.arts.movies has too much traffic for me :-)
> 

  That's Hannibal Lechtor, not Hector, and he appears in the film/book
"Manhunter", produced by "Miami Vice" EP Michael Mann. He is much more
present in the book than the film.




<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|  Michael Rivero rivero@mdcbbs.com Homo Cyberneticus-Computational Man  |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: ddrumm@amiganet.chi.il.us (Daniel Drumm)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Thunderheart & Crazy Horse Info (no spoilers)
Date: 11 Apr 92 08:50:02 GMT
Organization: Amiga Network Information Systems

Greg Bole:
 
Redford seems occupied with movies about spirituality and such...he tried to convince Robert Pirsig to allow him to make Zen and The Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. Glad that wasn't done...
From: dsc@gemini.tmc.edu (Doug S. Caprette Bldg. 28 W191 x3892)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Why Horror? (was: Silence Lambs & Cape Fear Hysteria !!!)
Date: 7 Apr 92 17:18:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: nsisrv.1992Apr7.171858.14118
Organization: NASA GSFC CDP VLBI

In article <1992Apr6.164040.1@mdcbbs.com> rivero@mdcbbs.com writes:
>In article <+yjjmhp@lynx.unm.edu>, lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble) writes:
>> bew@brahms.udel.edu (Ben Williams) writes:
>> 
>
>  I'm not sure if the above is true, but horror films are notoriously easy to
>sell and produce, and have catepulted many an actor or director to fame
>and fortune. Francis Ford Coppola's directorial debut was a film called
>"Dimentia 13". Humphrey Bogart's first film role was as a vampire (from whence
>rumor has it he acquired the famous lip twitch). James Arness's first film
>role was as a human Vegetable in "It Came From Outer Space". And as
>embarressed as I am to admit it, the very first screenplay I ever sold
>was a horror film (don't worry, Columbia had a bad year and decided not
>to produce it).
>
James Arness played the alien vegtable creature in "The Thing", subtitled
"From Another Planet"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: scholl@uvmark.uucp (Kathryn Scholl)
Subject: Ingrid Bergman & Oscar & Murder on the Orient Express
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 92 15:51:44 GMT
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.


With all of this post-Oscar discussion, I have a nagging question.

I was watching "Murder on the Orient Express" a couple of weeks ago
during one of those "Oscar-winning movies" weeks on our local station,
and during the first break, the host talked about Ingrid Bergman's
Oscar-winning performance for Best Supporting Actress.

Well, I was now ready to pay attention to this performance, but my god,
she couldn't have been in the movie for more than about 5 complete
minutes (I know, amount of time is not important, especially in the
light of Hopkins/SOTL/Best Actor), but the "Oscar-winning performance"???

She appeared to be sloughing through the role, unimportant as it was,
without a care or clue!  Yuck!  Did she REALLY win BSA that year?

I know, I know, it's all impression, perception, competition, etc.,
but who else was nominated that year?  Was Ingrid "due" for a
sentimental award or something?

Just curious...
-- 
 Kathryn Scholl
 Vmark Software, Inc., 5 Strathmore Road, Natick, MA  01760, USA
 Internet: uvmark!scholl@merk.com, UUCP: uunet!merk.com!uvmark!scholl
 Phone: (508) 655-3700, Fax: (508) 655-8395
From: v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Michelle L. Zafron)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: hammer
Date: 15 Apr 92 22:25:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr15.104126.6158@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>, leeper@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Mark R. Leeper) writes...
>In article <Ron_O'Hara.5074@tvbbs.wimsey.bc.ca> Ron_O'Hara@tvbbs.wimsey.bc.ca (Ron O'Hara) writes:
>> Anyone into watching the British horror movies produced by the famous
>> Hammer studios? I'm curious to know all the Frankenstein titles.
>> -- Via DLG Pro v0.991

>There have been (in my opinion) three great cycles of horror films.
>There was the German Expressionist cycle of the 20's, the Universal
>cycle of the 30's and 40's, and the Hammer cycle of the mid-50s to
>mid-70's.

> The Frankenstein series was for the most
>part quite good.  (Someone else has listed the titles so I won't.)
>What is particularly good is the presence of Peter Cushing.  Cushing is
>a much under-rated actor, though he does get quite a lot of
>appreciation in Britain where he has become sort of an avuncular
>figure.  

Something about Cushing that I've always admired, even though he's been in a lot
schlock movies, he always, but always turns in a good solid performance.  To 
take a counter example from the same genre, Vincent Price can be a good actor,
but unless the part is really good or he has a director who can control 
him--he's too hammy for words.  While that's part of his charm, it can really
detract from a film.  That's not really a concern with Peter Cushing.

>What was good about this series is that Victor changes from
>film to film.  In each film his personality is different but a logical
>result of what has happened in the previous films. 

Oh definitely.  Cushing managed to make a clear character progression throughout
the cycle despite (towards the end) some pretty poor writing.  Even though
Hammer abandoned a strictly serial format after the second movie, Victor's 
character does change.  

>In some cases the
>films had some sophisticated themes.  In FRANKENSTEIN MUST BE DESTROYED
>he attempts to save a genius's life by transplanting the brain into
>another body.  It is not a deformed or monsterous body, just another
>body.  What goes wrong is basically technology shock.  Neither the
>patient nor his wife can come to terms with this being the same person
>if the body looks different.

A question about this film, I've heard that there is another version not
shown in America with extra more "violent" footage.  By today's standards,
that's probably not true anymore, but does anyone know anything about it?

>				Mark Leeper
>				...att!mtgzy!leeper
>				(908)957-5619
--Michelle L. Zafron (v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Suppose that you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress.  But
 I repeat myself."
                                 --Mark Twain   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: tkelsey@panix.com (Tom Kelsey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Plug Pulled on Spike Lee's "Malcolm X"
Date: 11 Apr 92 15:20:01 GMT
Organization: PANIX - Public Access Unix Systems of NY

In article <1992Apr8.151046.15165@mahendo.jpl.nasa.gov> reiher@onyx.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Peter Reiher) writes:
>In article <1992Apr7.220503.4116@mahendo.jpl.nasa.gov> reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov (Peter Reiher) writes:
>>A recent article in the business section of the LA Times said that
>>the completion bond company has just pulled the plug on Spike Lee's
>>uncompleted film, "Malcolm X".  
>
>>Lee has produced a 4 hour rough cut of "Malcolm X"
>>already, and was contractually obligated to produce a three hour
>>cut, at the longest.  The completion bond company apparently wants
>>a cut around 2 hours, or a little longer, 
>
>Another article in yesterday's LA Times had further clarification.
>Lee is contractually obligated (to the original studio, not just the
>completion bond company) to produce a 2 hr. and 15 minute movie.  The
>completion bond company wants to hold him to the contract.  The issue
>does indeed seem to be a battle over the length of the film, rather than
>whether the film will be completed or how much more money will be spent.
>
>Lee has taken a big risk with "Malcolm X".  All along, apparently he
>was determined that he would make a 3 hour film costing around $33 million.
>When the studio would only authorize $28 million, and demanded a 2 hr.,
>15 minute film, Lee signed, but seems to have never intended to honor
>those clauses.  In today's Hollywood, this is a very risky maneuver,
>indeed.  If he prevails, and if the film is a big hit, all will be forgiven.
>If he prevails, and the film is a flop, Lee will probably have trouble
>getting his next film made the way he wants it.  If he doesn't prevail,
>then Lee will lose a great deal of bargaining clout for future films,
>regardless of how the film does - if it's a flop, it's his fault; if it's
>a hit, the wisdom of the studio/completion bond company will have saved
>the film.  For that reason, (along with his sincere belief that "Malcolm
>X" requires 3 hrs. to be a good film) I expect Lee to go to the mat for the 
>long version.
>

My feeling is that if he is 'going to the mat' for all this 'artistic'
integrity he's nuts.  Its a film I feel no one wants to see any way..
The 'whites' will stay away in DROVES...  

tk
From: spark@spuddy.uucp (Steve)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: SEQUEL TO T2
Date: 6 Apr 92 20:11:39 GMT
Organization: Spuddy's Public Usenet Domain

In article <1992Apr6.035854.15970@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jpm56290@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Duner) writes:
>
>   This is my first time reading and posting on this newsgroup, so I don't
>   know if this was already talked about.  Anyway, did anyone notice that
>   Arnold's arm that was ripped off was never distroyed?  Either the director
>   forgot about it, or maybe this will lead to another Terminator movie.
>   I hope not, 'cause it be hard to beat the two we have now.
>
Yeh ... I was hoping that they were going to use the arm off the old
terminator (which John was carrying around in his bag) to replace the
one on Arnie. 

Steve
From: rjn@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Bob Niland)
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 18:41:52 GMT
Subject: Re: IMAX and OMNIMAX
Organization: Hewlett-Packard/WSY Ft.Collins,CO,USA