HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: peggy@gatech.edu (Margaret Simpson)
Subject: Illini Score Needed ASAP!!!
Followup-To: peggy@cc.gatech.edu
Organization: Georgia Tech College of Computing
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 13:05:40 GMT

Could someone please post or email to me the score of the Illinios
- Minnesota game playes last night in Minn...

Thanks!  -- Peggy


-- 
   ___(_)              |\    /|  ----  ----  |                ._.___   
 /( _ ,U -| moo!       | \  / |  |  |  |  |  |                 U. _ }  
  || ||                |  \/  |  ----  ----  o                  || ||  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kbowers@esrc1.uucp (Ken Bowers)
Subject: Re: Hawaii ranking
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 20:23:27 GMT

In article <92274.142302C31801AG@wuvmd.wustl.edu> C31801AG@WUVMD (Bapi Gupta) writes:
>>
>>In article <1992Sep30.173016.16677@news.Hawaii.Edu>, bill@gaza.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu
>>(William J. King) says:
>>
>>The New York Times ranked HAWAII #7 in college FootBall.  But then,
>>what does the Times know of football.   :-)
>
>I have them rated #12 this week.  They're 3-0 against teams that are 6-3
>
>Watch out, Utah is another sleeper.  Since my Huskers stomped them in
>Lincoln in the opener for both teams, UH was beaten it's last two
>opponents 42-9 and 42-18.
>


The rise of WCB? (WAC Computing Bias)

Ken B.
From: grundusk@sunflare.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Kevin Grunduski)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Wolvies romp
Date: 28 Sep 92 19:36:15 GMT
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center

Houston finally got what they had coming 61-7. Too bad Jenkins!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dwray@convex.com (Daryl Wray)
Subject: Re: Stanford banned again
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 13:42:41 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In article <aelman.717788026@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> aelman@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Adam Elman) writes:
>
>Frankly, the Stanford Band hasn't done anything that anyone _really_
>should have been offended by (with the possible exception of the nun
>costume controversy last year, but that was the drum major himself,
>who did not consult the rest of the band in that decision) since the
                                                            ^^^^^^^^^
>urinating-on-the-field incident in 1986.  In Oregon, people were
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>booing us LOOOOOOONG before we even started the show.  The show itself
>was really not that bad (I reiterate my offer to e-mail anyone a copy
>of the script).  The Casper show could have offended only one person,
>and we think he probably would have taken it with a grain of salt.

This is one I havn't heard.  Would someone like to fill me in on this story?

>If you think the Stanford Band's humor is sophomoric, and you have
>lots of better ideas for shows, tell me -- we're always looking for
>good show ideas, and I'm perfectly willing to suggest good ones.

This is an interesting follow-up given the previous purported incident!?!

>
>Adam Elman
>aelman@cs.stanford.edu
>
>P.S. Don't get me wrong -- I appreciate a good traditional marching
>band as much as the next guy.  But I think what we do gives a bit of
>variety to the game that you just don't get from traditional bands.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ssj@ais.org (Stephen S. Johnston)
Subject: Re: Miami - FSU
Organization: UMCC
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 04:18:56 GMT

In article <1992Oct04.220854.50128@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>In article <vrcpfvg@lynx.unm.edu> jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund) writes:
>>In article <BvKBp3.DEF@news.cso.uiuc.edu> pol30546@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Peder Larsen) writes:
>>>Miami has just reaffirmed itself as the #1 team in the country
>>                                        ^^^^^
>>>by defeating Florida State in an exciting battle at the Orange
>>>Bowl.
>>>
>>>Miami 19
>>>FSU   16   Final
>>
>>I guess they are still #2 on the CNN/USA Today poll just due to some
>>typo then.   ;-)
>
>Well, if you wait until tomorrow, things might change.  After all, both teams
>have now beaten 2 ranked teams.  Miami beat the #3 team in the nation, while
>Washington beat the #20 or so team.  
>>
>>-Eric Jaderlund
>> jade@triton.unm.edu
>
>
>-- 
>David T. Meeks                    ||" We are jigsaw pieces, aligned on the 
>VMark Software, Inc.              ||  perimeter edge, 
>uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  interlocked through a missing piece"
>davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||" ...This world is totally Fugazi"

It IS tomorrow.  The CNN/USA Today poll came out at 11:00 AM EST. 
#1 Washington
#2 Miami
#3 Michigan.  

------
Steve
From: mwhanley@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Hanley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Scripps Howard Heisman poll
Date: 28 Sep 92 15:11:25 GMT
Organization: Syracuse University

In article <1992Sep25.200856.1547@u.washington.edu> tannerg@milton.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner) writes:
>>
>>Here's the latest (9/23) Scripps Howard Heisman poll, a national poll
>>of Heisman voters.  I got it from our local paper here in Tallahassee:
>>
>>Marshall Faulk, San Diego State   45 points
>>Glyn Milburn, Stanford            17
>>Charlie Ward, Florida State       16
>>Gino Torretta, Miami (Fla)        14
>>Shane Matthews, Florida           13
>>Rick Mirer, Notre Dame             9
>>Garrison Hearst, Georgia           8
>>Kordell Stewart, Colorado          7
>
>Where is Dan Freiburger of SMU?  
>

  Where is Qadry Ismail of SU?

-matt
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: elsonliu@leland.Stanford.EDU (Liu)
Subject: Stanford - ND means nothing
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 92 21:33:14 GMT

1990: Stanford loses to San Jose State
      Stanford upsets Notre Dame
      Stanford loses to U$C, begins three game losing streak to 3-5 (?) season

1992: Stanford defeats San Jose State in a lackluster performance
      Stanford upsets Notre Dame
      Stanford at UCLA...

Unfortunately, Stanford football is synonymous with inconsistency.  No one
game (except maybe Big Game against Cal) means anything unless Stanford
demonstrates some consistency and comes away with victories in our
conference schedule.  Frankly, I'll wait until the UCLA game to decide
really how far we've come since 1990.

     .....Elson.....

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Subject: Re: Marshall Faulk
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 17:36:53 GMT

sms35849@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Scott M. Stortzum) writes:

>Can someone please tell me his stats for the game over the weekend?

I don't have complete stats, but I do remeber reading that he got his
200 yards at New Mexico.  I think the article said that he had 839 yards
rushing in his four games, an average of 210 ypg.  For those who are
curious, San Diego State's remaining schedule is:

bye, UTEP, Air Force, @CSU, @Wyoming, Hawaii, Fresno St, Miami, Bowl game.

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
University of Washington      *   water again!
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
From: ds4@north3.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Penn State's schedule
Date: 6 Oct 92 02:40:30 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.211921.173186@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, bml2@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (BRIAN MICHAEL LUCY) writes:
|> In article <1992Oct2.145815.15202@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>, elgx@vax5.cit.cornell.e
|> du writes:
|> >Could someone e-mail to me a schedule of Penn State's games?
|> >
|> >I'm interested mostly in their November games at home, but if someone had
|> >a schedule already in file form they could send me that, and it would
|> >be greatly appreciated.
|> >
|> >Dave Han
|> >
|>  No Problem!
|>                               Predicted scores (all PSU victories of course!)
|>  Oct 10 - Miami(FL)       :   24 - 14

Anyone who says that a team will score 24 points off of Miami's defense are crazy
and should be locked up.  FSU's offense did not score a touchdown against Miami,
and one of their field goals was set up by a punt return which (allong with the
kick off return for a touchdown) should of been called back because of clipping. 
That leaves only two field goals FSU's offense put on the board by them selves.

You are going to score less then or 10 points.

|>  Oct 17 - Boston College      30 - 17
|>  Oct 24 - @West Virginia      36 - 10
|>  Oct 31 - @BYU                36 - 24
|>  Nov 14 - @Notre Dame         24 - 20

Now, I know you are crazy :)  You are going to score the same amount of points on
Notre Dame as on Miami....the real score will be, 36 - 16 :) 

|>  Nov 21 - Pittsburgh          43 - 14
|> 
|>  Brian Lucy
|> 
|>  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: godfrey@cs.washington.edu (Garr Godfrey)
Subject: Re: Pac Ten Review (9/26/92)
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 17:03:14 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.072037.12906@u.washington.edu> crs@milton.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck) writes:
>
>Next Week's games:  (Send your Pac Ten Pundit's Picks by Thursday!!!)
>
>USC @ Washington
>Temple @ Washington State
>UCLA @ Arizona
>Arizona State @ Oregon
>Oregon State @ California
>Stanford @ Notre Dame
>California has a bye.

Then who is Oregon State playing?

>
>****************************************************************************
>Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
>Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
>University of Washington      *   water again!
>Seattle, WA 98195             *
>****************************************************************************
>
>


-- 
***********************************************************************
* Garr Godfrey
*   Any opinions expressed are someone else's. I take no responsibility.
*   godfrey@cs.washington.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jdd@engr.ucf.edu (Joseph Dumas)
Subject: Re: Who is number 1?
Summary: Don't forget the SEC
Keywords: Alabama, Tennessee
Organization: engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 15:52:15 GMT

> echen@hardy.u.washington.edu (Ed Chen) writes:
>In article <ASH.92Oct5090713@ulysses.mr.ams.com> (Alan Harder) writes:
>>
>>Washington - played poorly against USC
>             ^ Offense
>
>>Miami - exciting but sloppy game.  Good defense.  Offense shaky all year.
>>FSU - Nope.  Lost a game.
>>Michigan - Perhaps the best team in the country right now, but has a tie.
>>Texas A&M - barely beat texas Tech.
>>
>					Ed

Tennessee - playing exceptionally well, shut out LSU in Baton Rouge
20-0.  The score was closer than the game....

Alabama - Routed South Carolina (48-7?? Or something like that....  Bet
SC and Arkansas are regretting their decision to play with the big boys
in the SEC.  But in a few years they'll be glad they did....)

The game between these two in 2 weeks will have serious national title
implications.  I should say the first game; they'll probably be meeting
again in the SEC title game in Birmingham in December  (unless, that is,
my Mississippi State Bulldogs do to Bama what they did to Florida :^)

Unlikely without Sleepy :-(

Joe
-- 
--->  Joe is jdd@engr.ucf.edu (Joseph Dumas):  "Cats are snooty and wouldn't
fetch a stick on a bet.  They also scratch.  I dislike cats....  I like dogs
because they forgive easily...and will settle for thirty seconds of care and
attention if that is all you have to spare."  --Lewis Grizzard
From: sjc@cs.purdue.EDU (Steve Chapin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Rose Bowl (was Re: Wash vs. Neb afterthought)
Date: 29 Sep 92 20:21:08 GMT
	<1992Sep29.185108.9751@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University

}} In article <1992Sep29.185108.9751@cis.ohio-state.edu> ellis@pike.cis.ohio-state.edu (steven lawrence ellis) writes:
}} 
}} Doesn't UCLA play UW this year?  Also, Michigan may not be in the Rose Bowl since
}} They have to play Ohio State in Columbus.  That is always a close game, even when
}} Ohio State has an average year.

1) No, UCLA doesn't face U-dub this year.
2) Who's dumping hallucinogens in the water in Columbus?  Under Earle
Bruce, the buckeyes played Michigan tough, but under John Cooper, it's
not been much of a contest.

And I'm an Ohio State fan!

sjc@cs.purdue.edu               Steve Chapin           Today's Grammar Lesson:
                The effect of his affected accent affected her,
                   and effected a change in her affections.

             If I don't want it in my back yard, I don't want it.
Newsgroups: osu.sports,rec.sport.football.college
From: jpersons@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (John C Persons)
Subject: Re: OSU Falls to Wisconsin!!
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 23:33:43 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.183202.754@alc.com> stassen@alc.com (Chris Stassen) writes:
>
>If Iowa beats Wisconsin in Iowa next weekend... the Wolverines still
>will control their own destiny, the Badgers will need *two* Wolverine
>losses, and Ohio State will need either an additional Badger loss or
>Michigan to win the rest of their games up to the date in Columbus.
>(Ohio State wins a three-way tie with Michigan and Wisconsin because
>the Buckeyes are 3-0 out of conference; OSU would lose a two-way tie
>with the Badgers on head-to-head record.)
>--

My guess is Wisconsin will lose two Big Ten games and Michigan will
come to Columbus undefeated.  So if the Bucks can get their act back 
together, they'll have their chance at Pasadena when Michigan comes
to town.  Can somebody tell me which of Wisconsin's games are at home
and which are on the road (besides Iowa)?

Thanks,
John



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ellingrw@infonode.ingr.com (Bob Ellington)
Subject: Re: TV games Oct 3
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 01:45:12 GMT

In article <69147@hydra.gatech.EDU>, mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:
> ellingrw@infonode.ingr.com (Bob Ellington) wrote:
> }
> }Georgia At Arkansas will be on JP/Sports at 12:30 ET  
> 
> What is with these JP bozos?
> 
> They could have chosen Vanderbilt at Auburn, a competitive game
> between 2 teams with a good shot at a bowl bid, or Kentucky at
> Ole Miss, a competitive game where the winner will have a shot at
> a bowl game.  Instead they pick the Georgia at Arkansas massacre.
> 
> They already have the Hapless Hogs scheduled for 2 other appearances
> in October - now we get to see them *3* times in one month????
> 
> -- 
> Mark Mitchell           Georgia Tech            mm42@prism.gatech.edu
>  "What's that he's tearing apart with his claws and his teeth?"        
>                            "That's his faithful teenage sidekick Buddy!"                          

Let's see....I show Oct 10 Arkansas at Tennessee and then
Nov 7 Arkansas at Miss St.  Mark is right, 3 times in a month.

Oh well, at least I don't have to make that 4 hour drive to Auburn
for an 11:30 kick off thanks to those Bozo's. :)

JP SEC schedule (barring other networks stealing the games)
Oct 10  Arkansas at Tennessee
Oct 17  Miss St. at S. Carolina
Oct 24  Ole Miss at Alabama
Oct 31  Tennessee at S. Carolina
Nov  7  Arkansas at Miss. St.
Nov 14  Georgia at Auburn; S. Carolina at Florida
Nov 21  Florida at Vanderbilt
Nov 28  Tennessee at Vanderbilt

I bet the reason 2 games are listed for Nov 14 is there is not much
of a way they will get the Georgia/Auburn game. :)

Really, they listed 2 for Nov 14 for the SEC, and also listed 2
for the ACC on that date.  All SEC games are listed as 12:30 ET 
kickoffs, and all ACC games are listed as 12:00 ET kickoffs.

Bob E.
From: JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: FSU-Miami (one more opinion)
Date: 2 Oct 92 13:43:51 GMT
Organization: GM Research Labs

In article <1992Oct2.021117.19156@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>
kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado) writes:
>Yes, we do play other competion this year besides Miami. Clemson (we won,
>barely), Ga. Tech (debatable I know), Virginia (they are still untested so
>this too is debatable), and Florida (always a good game..very intense rivalry)

You forgot North Carolina State, which you guys beat but who looks to be
pretty good and I think they are rated.  I too am looking forward to
the FSU Notre Dame series.  Bobby Bowden is pure class with a goodly
amount of coaching talent and offensive thrills thrown in.  My wife
is an FSU grad so there may be some trouble at home.  Fortunately,
the Irish have been known to tie! 8^)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: wilbanks@spot.Colorado.EDU (Wendell Gee)
Subject: Re: Pay for seating...
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 20:44:01 GMT

Colorado football season tickets are only $10, provided you read the rules 
and properly follow the instructions to get tickets (which this year were 
comparable to getting Guns and Roses tickets). I was out of town, forgot 
that I had to give a note AND personal check to a person of my level and send 
them to stand in line for me.

In essence, a violation of rule #27, I was told later. 
Thus, I have ONE ticket to the OU game - and guess which section I'm sitting 
in. Should be an experience.

Oh, because of the athletic fee ($33/sem.) most sports here are free. 
Including basketball...
-- 
Dylan Wilbanks, Classics major, AND NOW Environmental Conservation!
Hobbes:"Why do we always play war and not peace?"|Currently at:
Calvin:"Too few role models."                    |Box 1143
Ren-n-Stimpy in '92! Vote for a real cartoon!    |Boulder, CO 80306
From: sjc@cs.purdue.EDU (Steve Chapin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Virginia Football
Date: 2 Oct 92 19:13:42 GMT
	<19824@ector.cs.purdue.edu> <BvI31n.48D@news.larc.nasa.gov>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University

}} In article <BvI31n.48D@news.larc.nasa.gov> cockrel@shab06.larc.nasa.gov (Charlie Cockrell) writes:
}} 
}} OK, so when do you pull your starters? If the game gets out of hand
}} quickly, do you set them down and miss letting them get valuable game
}} experience?

A very tough question.  I probably wouldn't pull my starters in the
first half of any game, and wouldn't pull them until about the end of
the third quarter of an early game, especially if they've been
struggling.  But I'd have to be ready to deal with charges of running
up the score.  If they came, I would explain the situation, and hope
people understand.

In short, Coach Welsh's actions seem quite reasonable, but from an
outside observer, saying "we pulled the starters at 48-0 to avoid
running up the score" sounds odd.  When the full context is known, it
doesn't sound so bad.

sjc@cs.purdue.edu               Steve Chapin           Today's Grammar Lesson:
                    ect. is meaningless; etc. == et cetera

                      Beef:  Real food for a dead planet.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tbreeden@afit.af.mil (Thomas A. Breeden)
Subject: Re: Gators vs MSU
Organization: Air Force Institute of Technology
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 14:04:15 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.180307.17603@b11.b11.ingr.com> mcconnel@b11.b11.ingr.com (Guy McConnell) writes:
>In article <1992Oct1.124952.19054@afit.af.mil> tbreeden@afit.af.mil (Thomas A. Breeden) writes:
>>
>>Can I possibly consume 12 Miller Lites in
>>three hours?
>
>    Sure, it's like making love in a canoe after all.  But why not
>leisurely consume 2 Guinness stouts and do the same thing with the
>added benefit of taste thrown in?
>
>>Need news from somebody down south.
>
>    That should be all the news you need.  Of course, you could try
>12 Guinness' and then you wouldn't care who won.
>
>--


I should have taken your advice.  What an abortion of a game!

Andy

Go Gators!  Beat somebody!
From: dpassage@soda.berkeley.edu (David G. Paschich)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Cal 42, Oregon State 0.
Date: 3 Oct 92 16:33:15
Organization: Organization?  Who cares?  You just gotta say "Go Bears!"
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu

The Bears defense really shone today. The Beavers' first two
drives were 3 and out, and Cal scored touchdowns on both ensuing
possessions.  The game was over by halfway through the first quarter.

Oregon State just looked pathetic.  The did bust a long run early, but
Cal was in their backfield all day long.  I lost count of the number
of times we stopped them for losses.  A couple of late drives against
our second and third string defense inflated their offensive totals.
:)

Anyone who's been to a Cal game in the last couple of years knows
about the heart and soul of the student section, Ken "Mic-Man"
Montgomery, in his last season as yell leader.  Well, for the second
quarter he brought in someone who must have been a trainee for next
year, and he was totally lame.  Just stood there and watched the game.
So we did what any self-respecting Cal crowd would do, and rolled him
up.  He didn't make it up very far, but Ken came back for the third
and late fourth quarters.

Anyway, in short,

GO BEARS!!!!

David Paschich

p.s.:  Gosh, we're undefeated in the Pac-10.  Wonder how long it will
last...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Subject: Oh Mr. Buttler.........
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Madison
Distribution: na
Date: 4 Oct 92 16:14:22 CDT

You insult my alma mater (for which you apologized - thanks), make fun of
their football program, and most importantly, laughed at me for believing
in the woofing gods.  I hope what happenned on Saturday taught you what
happens when you screw with the Woofing Gods!
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jsnow@moons.sim.es.com (John Snow)
Subject: Re: Weekend WacK UPdate
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 15:04:18 GMT

woodle1@bnlux1.bnl.gov (kim woodle) writes:

>In article <1992Sep28.171817.11509@news.Hawaii.Edu> bill@gaza.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (William J. King) writes:
>>
>>9/28/91
>>Wyo 26 Louisvill 24
>>
>Is this score correct? I thought I saw the score the other way around on
>ESPN. Couldn't find it in the paper.

Yes, the score is correct. Wyoming beat Louisville 26-24.

--John

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
John F. Snow                         INET:           jsnow@moons.sim.es.com
Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp.    
Salt Lake City, Utah                 America Online: JohnSnow  GEnie: J.SNOW2
From: valdis@skat.usc.edu (Valdis Kalejs)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Trojan News Vol.8 (2-Game Stats)
Date: 29 Sep 1992 18:10:01 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: skat.usc.edu

Here are the combined stats for the past two games:


                     USC            OPP

First Downs          38             32
Rushes/yds       93/306         64/277
Passing yds         479            315
Plays/net yds   153/785        135/592
Turnovers             5              4
Penalties/yds    18/167          11/85
Time of poss.     63:13          56:47


RUSHING LEADERS:

             ATT         YDS           TDS
McFadden      29         136            0
Crayton       35         132            0


RECEIVING LEADERS:

             REC         YDS            TDS

Conway        14         195             2
Morton        4           93             3


PASSING STATS:

             ATT        COMP       YDS      TDS      INT

Johnson       70         37        479       5        2
OPP           71         31        315       2        2


Fight On,BEAT THE PUPPIES!

Valdis