HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: chrisr@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Chris Ringe)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Location of PAL/NTSC jumper/solder pad NEEDED for A600/HD.
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 01:12:11 MST
Organization: Edmonton Remote Systems #3, Edmonton, AB, Canada

I am in desparate need to find the solder pad for ntsc/pal configurations on
the motherboard.  As far a I can tell, there is only on pad.  Perhaps it may be
just a trace that needs to be modified.  CBM felt it a cost saving measure to
not include the schematics for the A600 in the manual.  I could just trace it
back from the AGNUS, however a solder pad would be easier...

Thanks...

Chris Ringe       (VE6MCP)
St. Albert, Alberta, CANADA
MAIL: chrisr@ersys.edm.ab.ca
PHONE: (403) 460-PLAY/7529
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: bartosz@stein.u.washington.edu (Bartosz Kijanka)
Subject: ADAPTEC questions
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 22:09:47 GMT


Could someone quote me some names & prices for Adaptec boards that will:

-convert IDE->SCSI
-conver QIC->SCSI


Thanks.


bartosz@u.washington.edu
From: steve@cbmtor.uucp (Steve Vetzal)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Kodak Photo CD
Date: 21 Dec 92 17:28:18 GMT
Organization: Commodore Business Machines (CANADA)

The XA is just multiple session support. You take in one roll of film, have
them develop it onto the CD. You have a CD with 24 pictures. Then, you take
another roll of film, hand them back the CD, and they place another "session"
on it with the new 24 pictures. From what I understand, the way the CD is
mastered, you can't modify what's already there (ie update directory tables
for more entries) so you have to add to the end of the info. Multiple session.
A standard drive will supposedly just look at the first session, therefore a 
simple short term solution is to just take in four rolls of film at once and
have all of your pictures put onto one session. Next you have to get onto
Kodak's *ss and get them to release the YCC file format specs so that
companies like ASDG can write loaders for them. (Right now, Kodak doesn't seem
to want to share the candy...)

					Steve Vetzal
From: bv077@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Gerry Michael Mullins)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Chip RAM: Freeing it up...
Date: 2 Jan 1993 07:53:14 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


	 I recently upgraded my A500 with a new 1MEG Agnus and 
a Super Denise. Installation went flawlessly and I love the
new modes and resolutions...

	Somehow I expected that I would have tons of free chip 
RAM after the new Agnus went in (I have a four megs of RAM 
via a BaseBoard in the belly slot), but there is only 
about 500K of Chip RAM reported in t
via the "avail" command. Is there anyway to force the things
that I load in my Startup into Fast RAM vs Chip RAM? Is there
a utility that will allow me to move everything to Fast RAM
after the machine boots up and reclaim the Chip RAM? 

	The primary reason that this is so important is that 
the machine seems to "outrun" itself in some applications and
splatters odd streaks and garbage on the screen in some
graphics intensive applications. I was able to decrease this
phenomena by commenting out the "addbuffers" command in my
startup which reclaimed some Chip RAM (with a corresponding
decrease in hard and floppy disk access times...*sigh*).

	Suggestions and comments are welcome. I'll summarize
if there is sufficient interest.

-- 
***** Eternity... With or without God, its a REAL long time *****

Gerry Mullins  Internet: gmullins@dom1.nuwes.sea06.navy.mil
*****************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: gregw@NeoSoft.com (Greg White)
Subject: A2630 problems
Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 23:37:58 GMT
Keywords: A2630 2.0 2.1 ROM

This is an A2630 hardware problem for anyone at CBM.
(are you there, Dave?).
 
A client has a A2630(rev 9.1) with 4 megs running in a A2000(rev 4.?) 
under 1.3 with no problems.
 
I upgraded the system to 2.1 with a new ROM.  Upon booting I got 
the 2630 monitor screen.  (The system booted up fine without the 
2630.)  Knowing this meant I probably had old 2630 ROMS,  I checked 
them.  Yep, rev -04.  Went back to the store and got a set of -07's. 
Stuck them in and now the system will not even boot,  no screen 
flashes, nothing.  Power LED comes on and never flashes.  Double 
checked the ROMs were installed correctly.  All OK.  
But still doesn't work.
 
Swapped the ROMs between U102 and U103 in case they were 
mislabelled. (Getting desperate here, but did have this 
happen one time!)
 
Swapped them back. Still doesn't work.
 
Figured my bad luck, I had a bad set of ROMs.  Back to the 
store and picked up two more sets (our last two).  These don't 
work either, with the same symptoms.
 
Tried the 2630 in a 2000 with a rev 6.2 board that is 
currently using a GVP 030 Combo board with no problems. 
 
The 2630 doesn't work here either. So I assume it is a 
problem with the 2630.
 
I can't believe I got 3 bad sets of ROMs in a row. 
(I don't have another 2630 to try them in.)
 
Any ideas on what I can check on the 2630?
 
Thanks for the help.
 
Greg White

-- 
Greg White
 
=== POST NO SIGS ===
From: ua197@freenet.victoria.bc.ca (Christopher Stewart)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Imagine Mailing List
Date: 31 Dec 92 00:50:27 GMT
Organization: Camosun College, Victoria B.C, Canada



     Could someone please e-mail me the address for the Imagine 
mailing list? Surely a FAQ ;-).
 
-- 
So far on the cutting edge, my butt's coleslaw...................
Yea, Right!!! On a 512k A1000 ;-)................................
Internet: ua197@freenet.victoria.bc.ca
Fidonet: Christopher Stewart @ 1:340/43
From: brademac@burner.com (Brian Rademacher)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: 1960 Problems
Date: 25 Dec 92 14:23:42 MST
Organization: The Back Burner BBS (via C-Net Amiga)

   I have gone through two 1960 monitors so far and have noticed the following problems:

1.  The first one made images on one side of the screen darker and bigger than those on the other side.

2.  Both monitors tend to make the screen shift to the left as they warm up (ie - it starts out to the right and then moves to the left, and finally stops when it has reached operating temperature.)

3.  The second monitor's screen is tilted to the left (ie - drill a hole in the middle of the screen and then rotate the whole screen a bit to the left).

  I really love C= products, but their monitors are proving to be a real pain.. Has anyone else experienced any 1960 problems, or does anyone have any suggestions as to what I should do?  I'm sick of sending things back to Creative Computers and paying the shipping on the way out....
  Right now I have monitor number two (I returned the first one) in for repair.. They say that they can fix the 3rd problem, but not the second...Interesting...
  Any ideas/suggestions would be greatly appreciated...

Brian

--- Via UCI v1.17 (C-Net Amiga)
From: kroener@cs.uni-sb.de (Thomas Kroener)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Quantum LP120S
Date: 23 Dec 92 13:22:37 GMT
Organization: Computer Science, University of the Saarland, Germany

mcphil@med.unc.edu (Philip McNamara) writes:
> 
> Ok, simple question number 1.  How many megabytes will fit on  a 
> Quantum LP120S?  120 or close enough to round up?  So... like 
> 115 or 119?  I just purchased a new one from Computer Shopping
> Network and can only get 114 mgeabytes using FFS.  The drive did not
> come with a sector error chart, so I am assuming no errors.  Safe
> assumption?  I don't know, can someone help?
> 
> Philip McNamara 
> McPhil@med.unc.edu 
> 

Hmh, I've formatted mine under OS 2.04 and I got 116.7 MBytes. As I heard
somewhere Quantum not uses 1024 Bytes for kilo (or mega) but 1000 Bytes to
calculate the diskspace.
I think that's the reason (correct me if I'm wrong)
 
            ---Thomas
From: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: 3.5" ide with a 1200?
Date: 30 Dec 92 05:27:40 GMT
Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA

In article <1992Dec29.164349.4715@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> zarthac@bradley.edu (Matthew Simmons) writes:
> John Charles Zurawski (zurawski@cse.uta.edu) wrote:
> : Is it possible to use a 3.5" IDE drive with the 1200's internal IDE
> : interface?  I know that it may not be possible for the drive to fit
> : inside the machine, but I have a spare IDE drive I could put in an
> : external case or something.  I also read someones comment that the
> : non HD model does not come with the necessary HD preparation software.
> : Is there freeware/pd equivalent software?  It would be a real shame if
> : I could not make use of this drive I already have.  I have a 
> : Western Digital AC280 and a Seagate ST157A.  I have not decided which
> : one to keep in my 386 yet.  Any help will be appreciated.
> 
> : Thanks.
> 
> 
> You should be able to use a 3.5" ide with it....  Just take a longer cable
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> and stick it on top of the computer, like I plan to doL....  (But isn't that
> bad for the computer?)  Well, I've had my 125 meg ide hd sitting out in the
> open on top of my 500 for a year, and its fine...

Make that "might be able".  There's a fair chance that any cable longer than
a couple inches will result in a non-working system.  Also, you would need
to make/buy a 2.5" - 3.5" adapater, since the cable/connector is different.

-- 
George Robbins - now working for,     work:   to be avoided at all costs...
but no way officially representing:   uucp:   {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
Commodore, Engineering Department     domain: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: jjf@byron.u.washington.edu (Matthew Martin)
Subject: Amiga 1000?
Reply-To: jjf@u.washington.edu
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 06:40:50 GMT

A friend of mine bought Crazy Cars III for his Amiga 500 (512k) and it works perfect.  I won't the same game work on my Amiga 1000 (512k) ... both running kickstart 1.3?  I have noticed a lot of stuff will not runl on the Amiga 1000 even though it works on a comparable Amiga 500.... whats missing folks?

jjf@byron.u.washington.edu




Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: bmccnnll@unix1.tcd.ie (Barry McConnell)
Subject: Re: A1200/4000 ramblings...
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 18:05:59 GMT

In <37972@cbmvax.commodore.com> daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie) writes:

>Flicker is largely a matter of opinion, which is probably based on what
>you're used to.  Every monitor flickers, but not everyone can see the
>flicker.  Certainly by the time you're up at 72Hz or so, few people have
>fast enough eyes to complain.  When I go to Europe, I wonder how anyone
>can watch PAL TV on a regular basis, but millions do.

As a European, I never really noticed flicker on my 50Hz monitor until these
discussions popped up originally several months ago! Now it can sometimes be
annoying, but you very quickly get used to it (I think it helps to ensure no
lights are shining at the monitor). If you think about the flicker, you will
see it; otherwise it's not noticeable. If I go into NTSC or Productivity mode
for a few minutes, and then back into PAL, it flickers like crazy, but that's
just relative, and it settles down after a few minutes. (The extra PAL res more
than makes up for it.)

As Dave said, it all depends on what you are used to.

Having said that, these new 72Hz (80Hz?) 17" monitors we have on our Mac
Quadras in work are absolutely **gorgeous**. No flicker AT ALL, even if you
try sneakily peeking out of the corner of your eye! It really makes the machine
a dream to use. (The 24-bit colour and '040 speed (and 32MB of RAM :-) helps
too....)

Barry.
From: mjl@dino.ph.utexas.edu (Maurice J. LeBrun)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: A4000 vs 486
Date: 22 Dec 92 08:18:31 GMT
	<boing.723864873@mcl> <1992Dec16.210457.15396@sx.mont.nec.com>
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
In-reply-to: ynecelc@sx.mont.nec.com's message of 16 Dec 92 21:04:57 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.210457.15396@sx.mont.nec.com> ynecelc@sx.mont.nec.com (Ellison Chan) writes:

   So I don't believe a PC system costing under $2000 US  can be 100MB/Sec. 
   Anyone got some _real_ proof? Also, are you talking about the VESA 
   standard or some proprietary setup?

Well since I started this thread, I've been following it pretty closely.  It
started with my friend's claim that his localbus PC can get a theoretical
100Mbit/sec video memory to CPU bandwidth, and I was interested in knowing
    ^^^
how the Amiga stacks up.  There have been several responses; Dave Haynie said
that the A3000 gets on the order of 50Mbit/sec.  And an A4000 can get about
4X this.  Then taking into account that the Amiga has a blitter, and lots of
inexpensive or free animation software, means to me the Amiga still holds a
good edge for animation, which was (indirectly) what I wanted to get at.

The 100MB/sec figure that has been mentioned sort of just rose up out of the
chaos :-).  It's not correct, at least not for reasonably priced systems.

--
Maurice LeBrun    mjl@dino.ph.utexas.edu
Institute for Fusion Studies, University of Texas at Austin

Faire de la bonne cuisine demande un certain temps.  Si on vous fait
attendre, c'est pour mieux vous servir, et vous plaire.
                                [menu of restaurant Antoine, New Orleans]
From: slink@s-link.escape.de (Nils Goroll)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Fix: 1084 Fadeout !
Date: 1 Jan 93 17:26:00 GMT
Organization: -S-LINK-> Public Mailbox, Braunschweig, Germany

Hi Everybody !

With   the   1084-Monitor   I  owned  some  years  ago  I  also  had  those
Fadeout-Problems.  But there is a very simple way how to fix them:

- Remove the back-cover.
- Spot  out  the  high-voltage-transformer.   I think  it is located in the
  lower-right corner of the board.
- Just re-solder the pins of the transformer.

Nils


=>> Nils Goroll       / SLINK@S-LINK.ZER          / -S-LINK->  -System
=>> W-33 Braunschweig / slink@s-link.escape.de    / -V32b  -V42b/ MNP5
=>> Voice 0531/77400  / Nils_Goroll%2:240/520.100 / Data 0531/790327+8

--> Every day our cause becomes clearer and people get smarter
From: lukec@terapin.com (Luke Chastain)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: My SupraFax modem
Date: 30 Dec 92 12:33:16 PST
Organization: BBS

    I regularly call a BBS but I have trouble connecting, it usually takes me
about ten calls to get a connect.  What is the newest ROM chip version out
there?

Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: Anu.Kapoor@launchpad.unc.edu (Anu Kapoor)
Subject: Re: Response to CBM re: Poor Media coverage
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 23:05:01 GMT

Actually, I believe C= marketing is pretty good.

I mean hey they got the biggest tv spot I've seen for the Amiga for free
in years. So it was only for .532 seconds but hey if the Miracle Piano
Teaching system wants to mention the Amiga let them.

<Please note above as sarcasm, thank you>

Cordially,
Anu Kapoor

<What did Marc Barret do that was so bad any way?>
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: koren@fc.hp.com (Steve Koren)
Subject: Re: A1200/4000 ramblings...
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 15:23:24 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Fort Collins Site
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1.3 PL5

> Ever sat in the front row of a cinema? The flicker is _really_ bad.
> I hear it's 24 fps, or something silly like that...

This is not the same thing at all.

First of all, a movie projector illuminates all points on the screen
simultaneously - there is no vertical and horizontal scanning such as
there is with CRT's.  They don't have to have a fast scan rate to avoid
flicker because each frame, taken by itself, is inherently flicker-free.
(If you stop the film on a given frame with the bulb lit, you'll just
see a slide type of picture).  A movie need only show you frames at a
fast enough rate so that your eye perceives it as smooth movement,
because there is no electron gun tracing scan lines on the screen.  This
smooth movement rate tends to happen at about 15 to 20 FPS for most
people.  A 24 FPS movie is fast enough to be perceived as smooth by
almost everyone.  I see 15 FPS as smooth, but some folks don't.

As an example of the difference between flicker caused by electron beam
scanning and insufficient frame rate, consider this.  I can make an
animation on my amiga in 640x400 mode which runs at 20 FPS.  This is
fast enough to be perceived as perfectly smooth motion, but yet, the
screen is flickering because the electron beam scan rate is not fast
enough.

I see _huge_ amounts of flicker when watching PAL TV, (I can even see
annoying flicker on NTSC TV, with its higher scan rate), but you get
used to it after a while and the effect kind of diminishes.  I imagine
if you grew up watching it, you'd never see it and wonder what the heck
all the north Americans and Japanese were talking about when they said
your TV flickered.

  - steve
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: 22black@sol.cs.wmich.edu (Martin Black)
Subject: Re: 1200 owners, please answer these questions..
Organization: Western Michigan Univ. Comp. Sci. Dept.
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 00:40:38 GMT

pati@milton.u.washington.edu (Pati Irish) writes:

>Im really debating getting a 1200 because of the follwing I have heard, could
>someone please answer if these thing are true or false..

>I heard the the 1200 will only run %25 percent of the software out there..

No way the percentage is much higher than that, say about 70%,
if you only count the stuff released in 92 then it is up to 90%,
and if you use skick to drop down to os1.3, it increases even more,
especially older stuff.

>heard the try'n to add a 2.5 int. drive such as the maxtor 80 meg, just doesnt
>work at all...

No prob here, you do have to buy a special small cable, a lot of mail order 
places have that cable for sale for as much as $15, and a 80meg 2.5 is about
$270, not bad pricing.

>And is a 1084 good enuff for the 1200, i mean do you really need a multisync
>to use the AGA software??

No way, I really doubt that commercial software will require you to have
a multisynch, they may put it into interlace, and then you need an a1960
or one of those not released quad synchs, to promote to no flicker, but
that won't happen until a cheap monitor is out that can handle promoted
synchs and ecs synchs.

>someone please get back to me, im really sick of this slow 500.. i wanna
>faster amiga bad.... Thanks..

Yep I like mine a lot.  I am waiting for some cheap fast ram to be available.
I have seen that 881/ram board, yet it costs $200 with 881 and no fast ram,
and then you have to get 4megs of ram.  I would like to get a cheap 2meg
ram board, for about $200 or less.  Should increase the speed by about 
2 times or more.

Martin

-- 
Bill SATAN LIVES Gates is the biggest enemy to personal computers ever.
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:26:06 EST
From: <ADB103@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Help with Accelerator needed

We are trying to fix an accelertor that had a bad ram chip. Question: are there
any jumpers that need to be moved in order to recognize the 32 bit ram? Or is
the problem elsewhere?
anthony Beecher
From: BC@cup.portal.com (Robert David Comer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: WB2.1 & Rexxmast
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 22:03:56 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

>Rick_Lang@amusers.UUCP (Rick Lang) writes:
>
>> This is a good change since many people would comment [Rexxmast] out of the
>> Startup-sequence file in order to custom define their rexx environment
>> via user-startup which was executed before the WB2.0 rexxmast.
>
>
>I don't know if it's good or not.  I mean, ARexx *doesn't work* until
>you go hacking around in your Startup-Seq.  Most people don't like to mess
>with that (or don't know _how_ to mess with it).
>
>I can just see it:
>
>Befuddled user: "Hello, Gold Disk?  My ProPage 'Genies' aren't working
>anymore."
>
>Gold Disk: "Are you sure ARexx is running?"
>
>User: "What's that?"
>
>Gold Disk: "Well, are you using WB2.0 or above?"
>
>User: "Heck yeah, I just installed 2.1."
>
>Gold Disk: "Oh, that's Commodore's fault.  You'll have to edit your
>Startup-Sequence."
>
>User: "What's that?"
>
>ad confusium... ad phone-billium... ad tech-support headacheium...
>

What about just dropping the AREXX icon into WBStartup???
Works great, is easy to do, and you don't have to change your S-S
Take about 10 secs to do, and can be easily described by phone.


Bob Comer
Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.hardware:22297 comp.sys.amiga.programmer:18054 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:32501
From: chucks@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Erik Funkenbusch)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Questions about new computers/future chipsets
Date: 2 Jan 93 07:25:02 GMT
Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN.

barrett@iastate.edu (Marc N. Barrett) writes:
>In article <1992Dec29.165251.1@fnalo.fnal.gov> traynor@fnalo.fnal.gov writes:
>>Hi--
>>
>>Has C= mentioned whether the new machines (A4000, A1200, etc) will 
>>be able to handle either their low-end or high-end chipsets when they
>>are released in 1994?  
>
>   No.  The chipsets in the A4000 and A1200 are surface-mounted. They 
>cannot be replaced.

Marc, you didn't answer the question, you just spewed a half-truth.  C= has
NOT said that the 1200/4000 will not support the new chipsets.  And just
because the chips are surface mounted, doesn't mean that the 1200/4000
won't be able to support them.  Ever heard of RTG?

>
>---
>| Marc Barrett -MB-  |  email: barrett@iastate.edu
>--------------------------------------------------

s
From: lukec@terapin.com (Luke Chastain)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: 2.1 is Eating up my RAM!!!
Date: 31 Dec 92 23:58:39 GMT
Organization: BBS

There is a simply answer to this...get more ram, which you should have done
along time ago.  If your low on money delete everything out of your WBStartup
drawer except mode.names and if your not using it, take ARexx out if your
startup.
Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.hardware:22202 comp.sys.amiga.misc:19230
From: mr_scary@lakes.trenton.sc.us (Chris Hurley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: How does 2.04 perform on A500???????????????????
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 23:15:24 EST
Reply-To: mr_scary@lakes.trenton.sc.us (Chris Hurley)
Organization: Lakes Public Access

jdblake@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (John David Blake) writes:

> I'm seriously contemplating purchasing the 2.04 ROMs. I have a 1 meg a500.
> My question is:
> 
>                       How will 2.04 perform on my A500
>                       ????????????????????????????????
> 
> Is it worth spending the $50, or should I invest in a nice trackball? My
> concerns are eating up memory, working withOUT a hard drive, and anything
> you might think is important. Thanks in advance!
> 
> Joe
> jdblake@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

Well, I think without a hard drive, you probably aren't getting much work 
done anyway.  2.04 ran great on my 500, but ran better with real FAST 
memory.  Within two days I had replaced all shareware stuff I was using 
under 1.3 with 2.04 equivalents (if needed.  Most weren't)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.graphics
From: dead@well.sf.ca.us (Bruce Fancher)
Subject: Does ECS fix flicker?
Organization: Phantom Access Technologies, Inc.
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 00:39:42 GMT

	Does the ECS chipset deinterlace (like the flicker fixer)?  Is this
chipset available for the A2000?  Please respond through mail.

Thanks