From: v125p7c5@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Michael Lamanna)
Newsgroups: alt.overlords
Subject: Re: PEROOOOOOT!
Summary: NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT
Keywords: NOT a good choice
Date: 3 Oct 92 15:36:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Oct1.231944.5079@cs.rose-hulman.edu>, erwinaw@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Anthony W. Erwin) writes...
> 
>	Go Ross Perot!  Clinton and Bush just don't cut it.  Let's get somebody  
>with good business sense who actually cares about the American people.  

	What good business sense does Ross have?  I agree that he has made
millions and billions for himself, but he didn't do it the way the the U.S.
government would have to do it.  
	Believe it or not the government doesn't operate like private
enterprise.  There are a completely different set of rules to follow.  I don't
think that Rose could do anything for this country following those guidelines.  

>	Bush has proven over the last four years that he's nothing.  What in  
>the hell has he done and what are his plans?  Someone told me that in an  
>interview, Bush was asked what his plans are for the next for years.  He  
>replied, "I'll handle whatever comes up."  Some vision.  I cannot come up with  
>very much positive out of the Bush years.  Regardless, I still think I would  
>vote for Bush over Clinton.  

	There is a lot of positive that came out of the Bush years. 
Unfortunately most of it was for other countries.  If you see the shape of
america falling apart then why not vote for some one who says that he is going
to work on those problems.  
	Bush's foreign policies have been great.  I personally am not to
worried about that right now.  I would rather see something done for the people
of this country.  

>	Clinton would probably have the country in the shape it was in when  
>Carter left.  All we need is to send the liberal democratic congress on a tax,  
>spend, and over-regulation spree.

	I see what great things that Reaganomics has left us with.  Rich
getting richer and poor getting poorer.  Sound like a good plan to you? 

>	Speaking of Congress, I agree with the Republican convention rally cry,  
>"CLEAN THE HOUSE!"  The men on Capital Hill just suck.

	How old are you?  Have you ever voted in an election before?  The
american people vote for their senators and representatives.  There is no one
appointing these people to those spots.  John Q. Public elects them.  If you
don't want them there then cast your vote.  I live in New York and I can't say
that my senator or representative sucks.  
	If you are that unhappy about it then cast your vote for some one else. 
If you didn't vote for him then shut up, because we live in a democracy and if
he was elected that means the the majority of the people in your district voted
for him.  Which would be due to the fact that this is the type of man that they
want in that position.

>	Let's elect Perot and get a strong third party started.
> 
	Putting Perot in the white house would be the worst move that you could
make.  You want to put a man that would never be able to finish something when
it doesn't all go his way.  His campaign is proof of this.  
	He has mad millions and billions for himself.  But that was done in the
private sector.  He mad the decisions that he would follow.  He mad his own
rules as to what to do with his money.  I don't know if it is unfortunate that
this is not the way that our government runs or not, but if he is in there he
will not be able to just tell the house how to spend the money.  It just
doesn't work that way.  Then I guess he would give up, since things won't be
going his way.  



						Michael Lamanna
					     University At Buffalo
					       Civil Engineering

	"It is easier to get forgiven than permission."


lamanna@ubunix.cc.buffalo.edu
v125p7c5@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.overlords