HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hafting@Lise.Unit.NO (Helge Hafting)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: 5mb for os/2
Date: 7 Sep 92 15:59:48 GMT
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology

In article <Bu6782.3sr@obiwan.uucp>, wayne@obiwan.uucp (Wayne Willcox) writes:
 > I have a a 386 40mghrtz machine with four meg of ram
 > and os/2 run's really slow, I suspect this is because
 > of the ram disk since I don't have enough memory and 
 > the hard drive run's virtually non stop. If I add 4 256k
 > dram to my board will this make much difference?

I have run os/2 with 5MB, and it worked ok.  But you will still get a lot of
disk activity if you run more than 2-3 programs at once.  I would not
recommend using a ramdisk with only 5MB.
-- 
 |  |      ^         |  |      /   ^   o
 |__| _   /|  _  _   |__| _   /|  /|   |    _   _
 |  |/_| / | / \/_|  |  |/ | /-+-/-+- /| /|/ | / \
 |  |\__/  |/\_/\_   |  |\_|/  |   \_/ |/ |  |/\_/
            __/                /              __/
From: Barry.King@ttlg.UUCP (Barry King)
Sender: postmaster@ttlg.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: What is BookMaster ?
Date: 06 Sep 92  11:28:22 mst

In a msg on <Sep 02 08:26>, TAN JIN MENG of 42:1000/2 writes:

 -> It's an IBM product. It seems that most of their machines have 
 -> Bookmaster readers (AIX etc) but not for OS/2.

Not true.  Bookmaster Read/2 is available for OS/2 and works quite nicely with OS/2 2.0.  Ask your local IBM rep about the product.

Regards,
 
Barry

 * Origin: The OS/2 Connection - Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (42:100/31)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry)
Subject: GMAKE and GCC and RCS
Originator: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 05:12:55 GMT

I have a slight problem using GMAKE, GCC and RCS together. This is
slightly related to my previous post about read only files under HPFS.

When using RCS, checked out files are marked read-only as they are under
UNIX and because of this GCC can not compile them because read-only implies
system and hidden (or so it seems), but that argument I've gone into in my
previous post.

My current grievance is as follows: When using RCS and GMAKE together,
GMAKe executes a command like the following:
test -f filename.c || co filename.c

In a UNIX shell, this tests if filename.c exists and if not it checks it
out of the RCS system [Did I mention that the checked-out copy is read-only
:-] Can anybody think of an equivalent way of doing such a thing in OS/2.
You only want the 'co' to execute if the 'test' fails, hence the ||.

Anybody think of a solution?

-- 
Tom J Parry.
Your reality is a figment of my imagination.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: laird@stable.ecn.purdue.edu (Kyler Laird)
Subject: Re: Northgates (and others) won't install OS/2 2.0!
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date:  7 Sep 92 23:14:32 GMT

jot@teak09.cray.com (Otto Tennant) writes:

>Playing with a Northgate and its h/w diagnostics, I discovered that
>the "Change Disk Line" of drive A was not working.  This prevents a
>lot of things from installing.

Yes, I thought of that too.  I figured that the change line wasn't
checked during the first part of installation, then was checked
after reboot.

Unfortunately, my change line checked out fine.


--kyler
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: xtifr@netcom.com (Chris Waters)
Subject: Re: using .zoo files?
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 92 08:35:12 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: usa

In <1992Sep4.232059.21538@njitgw.njit.edu> dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:

>Use the zoo archiver.  Download /pub/os2/all/archivers/zoo210e.exe.
                                          ^^^
This brings up an interesting point.  Has anyone considered recompiling
zoo as a 32-bit app?  (My IBM compiler is still on order, or I would).
Having a zoo that runs in a dosbox may be nice for some, but having a
(presumably much faster) 32-bit version might be nice for others....
-- 
Chris Waters    | the insane don't | NOBODY for President!
xtifr@netcom.COM| need disclaimers | Because Nobody's perfect!!
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.networking
From: comehome@wam.umd.edu (Neal A. Dillman)
Subject: OS/2 2.0GA and Novell 3.11 and AS/400 PCS
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 13:52:30 GMT



Hi,
	Has anybody got OS/2 2.0 working with the following:
1)  Novell Netware v3.11
2)  IBM AS/400 PC Support
3)  Over 16MB Token Ring

	If there is such a pperson out there I would be very grateful to 
receive E-mail from him/her.  I have not yet received the requester for 
OS/2 2.0 and I therefore haven't made any real attempt to have these
products working in harmony.  If anyone has any relating tips or tricks
please let me know.

					thanks,
					Neal
					comehome@wam.umd.edu

						

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
"What you believe is what you are..." | Neal A. Dillman
 "If you choose not to decide,         | NeXTmail: comehome@wam.umd.edu
  you still have made a choice"        | INTERnet: comehome@jolt.eng.umd.edu
From: axpmw@acad2.alaska.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Wordperfect for Dos Locks Up
Date: 11 Sep 92 13:52:42 GMT
Organization: University of Alaska

I have version 5.1 of Wordperfect for DOS... My sister got in
it by mistake and hit escape, then ended up with 8 q's ..and then
she typed some stuff (quit) ...(basically she had no idea how
to exit wordperfect...) ...then it totally locked up on her...

I came in, did a ctrl-esc to close/kill it... but why did it lock up?

Any ideas? does it need dos HIGH or XMS handle updated? Thanks Pam
What are some good values for the XMS parameters?

I own a 486/33mhz w/120mb ...if that helps... 

-- 
Pam Woods                              Email:  Internet: axpmw@acad2.alaska.edu
University Of Alaska Anchorage                 Bitnet:   axpmw@alaska
System: Amiga3000/25/40Mb/Wb2.04
From: hatton@socrates.ucsf.edu (Tom Hatton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: os/2 win3.1 support
Date: 5 Sep 92 00:47:18 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab

roger.ramsey@canrem.com (roger ramsey) writes:
>Richard Anstruther wrote on 09-02-92 regarding UN:OS/2 WIN3.1 SUPPORT:
>RA>I believe MS's loud proclamations of Windows 3.1 in 1991 takes
>RA>that award.

>Nah.  That award really belongs to good ol' Will Zachmann (who was quietly 
>padding around the Windows & OS/2 Conference I attended recently) 
>vociferously and vehemently trumpeting that OS/2 will take over the 
>desktop "any day now" for the last five years.

I see. We can equate the opinion of a cloumnist who is paid to speculate
with the official announcements of Microsoft about a professional product,
according to your logic. At least your bias has been clear, now as in the
past, but try to keep closer to the sane side of the road.

I agree Zachmann has been stridently pushing OS/2, and I don't listen to
anything any columnist says without a great deal of scepticism, but I
keep hoping that announcements about software from companies hold a little
more credibility. And going by *official* announced dates, IBM seems to
me to have a more credible record than Microsoft.

[Re: undoc'd calls in Win]
>This leads me to believe that if there are allegations, once more they are 
>either sour grapes or hot air.

There seems to have been an about face by MS here - in InfoWorld they now
seem to acknowledge the existence of undoc'd calls, but are trying to play
down their importance, denying any benefit to MS apps. Previously they 
claimed no undoc'd calls existed. Hopefully the picture will become clear 
soon. In any case, it is not hot air, and if it is true, then I don't think
it qualifies as sour grapes either.

Tom
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jld@datascope.com (Jay L. Davis)
Subject: Re: Northgates (and others) won't install OS/2 2.0!
Organization: Datascope Corp.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 21:07:17 GMT

In article <JOT.92Sep3153440@teak09.cray.com> jot@teak09.cray.com (Otto Tennant) writes:
>Playing with a Northgate and its h/w diagnostics, I discovered that
>the "Change Disk Line" of drive A was not working.  This prevents a
>lot of things from installing.
>--
>===============================================================================
>J.Otto Tennant      Forsan et haec olim meminisse juvabit.         jot@cray.com
>Cray Research, Inc.              Virgil                          (612) 683-5872
>655 Lone Oak Drive                                                
>Eagan, MN 55121

That will do it. I had that happen on my 5.25" drive (on a Northgate) just
last week. My soulution, I opened up the machine and vacuumed the dust
build-up that had accumulated in the drive. That fixed it.
Hi-tech solutions for hi-tech problems!

---Jay Davis
From: ry01@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ROBERT YUNG)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: i've seen nt......
Date: 8 Sep 92 16:42:08 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <harris.715490274@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu>, harris@garfield.catt.ncsu.
edu (Michael Harris) writes:

>I don't want IBM paying for diskettes to everyone.  Think about how
>much money would be wasted sending the diskettes to everyone on this
>newsgroup who had OS/2?  We don't need them... we have the IBM ftp site.
>
>Money that could go to making something else cheaper.
>
>______________________________________________________________________________
>     Michael Harris - harris@catt.ncsu.edu or harris@carvm3.vnet.ibm.com
> System Administrator, Computer & Technologies Theme Program, NC State Univ.
>(My opinions are my own and do not represent those of NCSU or IBM Corporation)
>

There is an IBM ftp site??? What's the address?. It would be so much faster if
I can get my update from there.
-- 
 (%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%)
  |  Off-campus address...                                          |
  |     first alley down this street, left refrigerator box. :-)    |
  |                                                                 |
   \_(Robert) Bobby Yung_______RY01@Lehigh.Edu________X-0471_______/
From: kc2x+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kwan-Ju Chen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: A-Train
Date: 7 Sep 92 18:33:13 GMT
Organization: Junior, IM - H&SS Track, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


Anyone got A-Train to run in color under OS/2 2.0?  I can only play it
in black and white!!

Thanks
From: mss2696@tamsun.tamu.edu (Mark Saum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Some more suggestions for OS/2
Keywords: suggestions for OS/2
Date: 8 Sep 92 15:00:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: tamsun.1992Sep8.150048.9130
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station

In article <gershon.715924658@husc10> gershon@husc10.harvard.edu (Ethan Gershon) writes:
>Three more suggestions for OS/2 to add to my list:
>
>Two system applets:
>
>- a "make bootable disk" applet
Already done.
>
>- a standard application installer / un-installer.  Perhaps the WPS could
>keep a table of all apps for this purpose?  I imagine that the application
>would come with some sort of information file to help the install program.
>
>- It would be nice if character mode applications could find out the screen
>dimensions in characters from the operating system. I am thinking of two
>examples: the first is Emacs for X, which uses an entirely character mode
>interface, but runs inside and X window. When you resize the window, Emacs
>adjusts to the number of characters that fit in the space. The other
>program is Qmodem, which uses whatever video mode and number of characters
>across and down that you happen to have on the screen when you start it.
>It would be nice if, say, character mode Lotus 1-2-3 for OS/2, when run in
>full screen mode, gave you an option for number of characters across and
>down to use (a list it would get from the operating system).  In a window,
>the same character mode application would adjust the number of characters
>based on the size of the window. (the obvious alternative for the same
>application would be a scaled window, where the window had the same number
>of characters regardless of size).

The hooks for this are already in the system.  The programmer just needs to
be able to take advantage of this.  Take a look in your programmers library
under the AVIO calls.

Generally, if you want a scalable window, you're just going to do it in a PM
window, not in a VIO-type of window interface.  It's also easier to implement
in PM when you have a message-based program already.

>
>                                                    --Ethan Gershon
>                                                    gershon@husc.harvard.edu


-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mark Saum                             |                    Texas A&M University 
Senior BANA/MIS Major                 |                  College Station, Texas
mss2696@tamsun.tamu.edu               |       Programmer, Department of Physics 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: FAGER@gribb.hsr.no (Fagerland, Svein      94/96)
Subject: IF IBM CANT GET US THE UPGRADE SOON, I'LL ..........
Organization: Rogaland University Centre
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 14:58:00 GMT

Yours, truly

Out of breath, Svein Fagerland  Rogaland Univercity Centre 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jld@datascope.com (Jay L. Davis)
Subject: Re: Is this system sufficient to run OS2 well???
Organization: Datascope Corp.
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 21:38:26 GMT

In article <9209031725.AA23913@tortoise.cis.ohio-state.edu> brown-sh@news.cis.ohio-state.edu (shawn c brown) writes:
>
>	I have this system and wondered if it would be good enough to run
>OS2 well, not just acceptably.
>
>	386-33 w/64K RAM cache
>	8 megs of RAM
>	120 MB ISA hard disk (reasonably fast)
>	Trident SVGA display card
>	Non-interlaced monitor
>	mouse (of course)
>
>	I benchmarked the system board against a PS/2 Model 80 and it blew
>it away, so I guess it's pretty fast...
>
>-Shawn Brown
>-The Ohio State University

Yes, that system should do very well. You may find yourself adding
another hard disk at some point.

---Jay Davis
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Background images
Keywords: image background
Date: 15 Sep 92 15:50:53 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <cfpdea.6@pnv.dsir.govt.nz> news@massey.ac.nz (USENET News System) writes:
>I love the background option for the desktop (image wise) and don't care if 
>the system has to update it every time I move a folder.

And did you know that each individual folder can have its own
background bitmap?

>Anyway, being a Dos & windows man before, I am wondering what format the 
>background requires (e.g. the Lighthouse image as supplied) and how does one 
>convert GIF (PCX etc) to this format.

Either Windows BMP or OS/2 BMP format, I believe.

Conversion utilities are available via anonymous ftp from
ftp-os2.nmsu.edu, I believe.  Look for such utilities as cvtbmp, for
example.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST is avail. from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/faq.
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | Or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP").
of Chicago, 60637       | Family Values Means a Job
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: gtaylor@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu (Gord Taylor)
Subject: Re: TE2 and <--
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 23:15:07 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.094702.13681@actrix.gen.nz> Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes:
>In article <klliou.715197673@milton> klliou@milton.u.washington.edu (Kan-Lee Liou) writes:
>> I am using TE2 to emulate VT100 to connect to both UNIX and VMS machines 
>> through my .32 bis modem.
>> I keep getting problems in using editors (vi for UNIX or ed for VMS).
>> The problems are parts of the text I am editing may become invisible (actually,
>> it is happening now).  No text is lost, but I just cannot see it.
>> One example is if I use the <-- (move left) key, all the characters it goes 
>> through will disappear.  I can use the --> (move right) key to let them show up
>> again, but it's really a pain..
>> How can  I modify the setup and solve these problems?
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Kan-Lee, klliou@u.washington.edu
>> 
>

Actually, I get much the same problem...it isn't (as far as I can tell) a VT-100 emulation problem at your end as it is at the UNIX end...Whenever I connect to U of Waterloo (the U I attend), I get the same thing when I'm in OS/2, when I used to use Windows 3.1...everywhere except when I used DOS (probably my term program compensated for it at that point because the programmers were aware of the error ie. Telix)


						'Til later


Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.misc:29441 comp.os.os2.programmer:4777 comp.os.os2.apps:5930 comp.os.os2.advocacy:5096
From: grant@pentagon-gw.army.mil (Pete Grant)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Subject: NT (was Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???
Date: 4 Sep 92 12:51:19 GMT
Organization: U.S. Army Artificial Intelligence Center, The Pentagon

In article <64910@cup.portal.com> TomK@cup.portal.com (Tom R Krotchko) writes:
>
>Finally, it appears to me that the "Windows" in "Windows NT" is
>purely a marketing move; the only thing Windows NT has in common
>with Windows 3.1 is they both run on Intel chips and both are made
>by Microsoft.
>

They also look quite similar.  A casual passer-by could glance at your
NT screen and would think you are running Windows 3.1.

Incidentally, the NT installation guide says that its boot sector is
incompatible with that of OS/2.  I temporarily removed OS/2 to do some
testing under NT (Pre-release developer's version).  I've made no 
attempt to bypass this restriction so I don't know if it can be done.

So far, I like OS/2 a lot better -- but keep in mind that my NT is
only a Beta version.

Pete.
>TomK@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Tseng SVGA - still trying (was: New TSENG LABS drivers)
From: loatspa@ucunix.san.uc.edu (Phil Loats)
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 14:14:39 GMT
Organization: University of Cincinnati
Keywords: NEW TSENG LABS DRIVERS

In article <hatton.716284224@cgl.ucsf.edu> hatton@socrates.ucsf.edu (Tom Hatton) writes:
>>In previous et4000 threads, I've read that IBM's CSD will include et4000
>>drivers.  I hope that they will have 1024x768x16 & 1024x768x256 versions
>
>go for it. The new 32-bit SVGA support for ET4000 is *rumoured* to be
>able to support seamless WinOS/2, you'll be happy to hear, and I expect
>that it certainly would go to 1024x768 since that is current "SVGA", 
>although newer cards support 1280, etc., and since 1024x768 is also the
>resolution of 8514 and XGA.

I have heard that 32-bit SVGA drivers for ET4000 will only support
640x480x256, 800x600x256, and 1024x768x256 modes.  The drivers should
also support seamless WinOS/2 sessions.  I have also heard that
these drivers look *MUCH* better than the current BBS drivers.  Now if
IBM will only release these...           
 
--
Phil Loats  <loatspa@ucunix.san.uc.edu>
From: Don.Johnson@f107.n207.z1.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: 3 button/accelerated
X-Sender: newtout 0.02 Aug 21 1992
Date: 14 Sep 92  17:33:00

SDA>In article <1992Sep13.053014.16816@muddcs.claremont.edu>
SDA>ddulay@jarthur.claremont.edu (Dan Dulay) writes:
SDA>>Do mouse drivers for OS/2 exist which allow the use of all three buttons
SDA>>on a mouse or allow for mouse speed acceleration?  Are any in the works?

There's an accelerated mouse driver on lots of BBSs called 2XMOUSE.ZIP
that worked great for me.  The standard driver was MUCH too sluggish.

                   =Don Johnson=

 * OLX 2.1 TD * OS/2: Not just a job, it's an adventure!

--- Maximus/2 2.01wb
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen)
Subject: nice icons
Organization: University of Hawaii
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 04:40:55 GMT

I stopped by the computer counter in the campus bookstore today and noticed
an IBM machine on display running OS/2.  But what caught my eye were the
nice icons in the various folders.  Certainly not the default icons shipped
with the system.  Anybody know where these colorful icons came from and how
we might be able to get our hands on them?  Maybe to be included in the CSD?
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: hafting@Lise.Unit.NO (Helge Hafting)
Subject: Re: clock
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 12:53:44 GMT

In article <18tqtqINNk1m@agate.berkeley.edu>, shyguy@ocf.berkeley.edu (David S. Shy) writes:
 > In article <18tqipINNk0b@agate.berkeley.edu> shyguy@ocf.berkeley.edu (David S. Shy) writes:
 > >A strange thing has been happening to me lately.  I've just
 > >reinstalled OS/2 and my clock refuses to show up on the desktop when
 > >I boot up.
 > >
 > 
 > By the way, I forgot to mention that in config.sys, I've set autostart
 > to:
 > 
 > 	startupfoldersonly
 > 
 > However, this shouldn't be affecting clock should it?  If it does, then
 > this is really weird because I don't have the same problem with pulse
 > as I have had with clock...
 > 
 > David Shy
 > shyguy@ocf.berkeley.edu
 > 
 > 
The default behaviour for os/2 is to start up all programs that where
running when you shut it down last time, and start all programs
in the startup folder.

when you set autostart=startupfoldersonly, you disable the feature
that start programs that were running at the last time of shutdown, only
programs in the startup folder will be started.  This can be useful if
a program wich hangs os/2 is autostarted so that you cannot get rid of it
by closing it.
-- 
 |  |      ^         |  |      /   ^   o
 |__| _   /|  _  _   |__| _   /|  /|   |    _   _
 |  |/_| / | / \/_|  |  |/ | /-+-/-+- /| /|/ | / \
 |  |\__/  |/\_/\_   |  |\_|/  |   \_/ |/ |  |/\_/
            __/                /              __/
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: joiner@myria.cs.umn.edu (Jay K. Joiner)
Subject: Re: Question about OS/2 and beta versions...
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 03:13:40 GMT

In <1992Sep10.223648.45366@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> ry01@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ROBERT YUNG) writes:

The program is in C:\OS2\BITMAPS by default.  It's hidden and system so
you won't see it normally.  In this directory, type ATTRIB * to see if
the files are there.  Type AAAAA to run the demo.  Type Ctrl-Esc to
exit.

>I'm worried that my friend might have gotten a BETA version of OS/2 2.0. How
>can I tell if it is BETA or GA? Does it say so on bootup? It does come on 21
>disks...

Type SYSLEVEL from an OS/2 prompt--GA is level 02000

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: int177c@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Jae Won)
Subject: Price of OS 2 in Australia
Organization: Monash University
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 11:12:44 GMT

Hi.

	I have been looking in papers(Green Guide if you are in Melbourne like me), but haven't been able to find any prices on OS/2...
	Could someone give me a price of OS/2 in Australia?(upgrade and non upgrade).
Thanks in advance

Jae

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: panton@bcarh685.bnr.ca (Kenneth Panton)
Subject: AAmazing VGA 700 card experiences
Reply-To: panton@bcarh685.bnr.ca (Kenneth Panton)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 19:45:42 GMT

Is anyone using AAmazing VGA 700 card with OS2? Do you like it?
Where can a person buy one?

-- 
Ken Panton    | Bell-Northern Research | Opinions expressed 
panton@bnr.ca | Ottawa, Canada         | are my own
ESN 393-7961