From: tylee@leety.austin.ibm.com (Ty Lee)
Subject: Re: Election in Taiwan
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 22:55:17 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <1992Dec23.184857.24618@cbnews.cb.att.com> liaohen@cbnews.cb.att.com (Heng-Hsin Liao) writes:
>
>Unfortunately, you do not look into how many Taiwanese were killed by
>KMT and why SOME of the past TI movement was violent-prone.
>

Yes, I did. And, I did know many Chinese were slaughtered by Taiwanese mobs 
during 228. And, TI terrorrists are indeed violent criminals based on their 
acts. Why don't I see the Taiwanese being accused of such violent crimes?
Sigh. ROC government is so wimpy to let go of these mobs. Well, that's
another story.


>
>Are you telling me that those Manchurians' and "Han Jiens"' lives were
>just shits 90 years ago and Dr. Sun and his gangs had all rights to
>kill?
>

Don't put your words on my mouth. Apparently, Hottentot is only an
euphemism to describe you. And, keep your bovine dejecta to yourself.
How do you come up with the number 90?

>Are you telling me that those Taiwanese deserved to be killed and KMT
>had all rights to execute in "228" and 50's/60's?
>

See my first paragraph. In fifties and sixties, CNP government performed
its proper responsibility to prosecute seditionaries, spies, secessionists
to stabilize the social order (according the CNP propaganda) including
not only the so-called Taiwanese but a lot of Chinese. That's not my
opinion, in case you are humor-impaired.

>Tell me how many people were killed by TI movement? You cannot just
>assert "TI terrors involved many people's lives, families, and friends"
>by what you think TIers should have done. You did mentioned below that
>you have few knowledge of TI terrors. Then the assertion seemed weak.
>As far as I know, old TI movement never killed anybody else. 
>

Yes, it is very strong. And, the people killed were let believe they
were martyrs, and were used to blackmail the CNP government.
Just cite some evidences from the newspaper force me to believe TI movement
is indeed very violent. Your last statement is by far the most rediculous
one ever seen.

>Through the most recent election, I estimate that pro-TI ratio is
>about 35-40%. This number encourages me to estimate that Taiwan will
>have a referendum on this and declare itself an independent country
>by the year 2000.
>

Doesn't the election outcome show your number of estimate is wrong.
The situation is temporary. People will and shall select a true suitable
candidate to the public office after the heat goes down. The good candidate 
is the one who proposes
the welfare of the public, think of the future of Taiwan. The bad candidate
is one who favor fanatic movement, blackmail the government, exploit social
disorder to achieve political ambition. 
Well, we have a new prophet who foretells the future of Taiwan for us.
I will save it and in case it were not cashed, show that in the net to
humiliate you.

>What is "CNP"? Kind of curious about who do you think I am.
>

Chinese Nationalist Party. The tone appeared in your last article
sounded like CNP propaganda. And, I don't give a hoot who you are.

>
>Heng-Hsin
>


-- 
/* The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of IBM's.         *\
 * Take care and have a nice day.                                            *
\* Ty Lee                                                                    */
Newsgroups: soc.culture.taiwan