HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ph3@unixg.ubc.ca (Michael Hamilton (phys 306))
Subject: Re: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 18:14:40 GMT

In <92007@bu.edu> kuchar@buast7.bu.edu (Tom Kuchar) writes:

>In article <AVENGER.92Jul27111121@realsoon.WPI.EDU> avenger@realsoon.WPI.EDU (Sam Pullara) writes:
>>A phaser blast probably
>>vaporises a good 2 kg of material (non-canon) from a person with the
>>gas rushing off at 100-200 m/s.  An 80 kg person would be knocked back
>>at between 200/80=2.5 m/s and 5 m/s, enough to knock someone against a
>>tree or move someone through the air in zero-g.

>2kg will leave a sizable hole!  

>>
>>I hope this settles this thread...
>>

>'fraid not. What about people who are stunned by a phaser, and yet
>get tossed backward? The Klingon on Genesis in STIII may have not
>been stunned, but Prof Crater in the Man Trap certainly was.  He got
>up after Kirk shot him.

>I'm sure there are other examples.  I just don't think the
>`vaporization' guess is a really good one, when you take into account
>the amount of material needed to be vaporized and the velocity it
>needs to be expelled.


Ah, but we've never seen anyone stunned in zero-g, it could simply be an
autonomic nervous effectct that, on being stunned, the average Joe's muscles
tense up and he <jumps> back on his own accord.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: edjans01@starbase.spd.louisville.edu (David Jansing)
Subject: Re: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Organization: University of Louisville
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 17:58:35 GMT

In <1992Jul25.172053.24591@umbc3.umbc.edu> cs106b16@umbc5.umbc.edu (cs106b16) writes:

>I just rewatched STVI:TUC on home video and was able to analyze certain things
>a little better in my home that I was unable to do at the theater. Maybe some
>of you can answer them:

>1) First of all Chronos One is a ship, but I think you guys are right about
>Chronos also being the planet. However, it was to be abandoned so by the time
>of ST:TNG it probably isn't the planet any longer.

We really don't know about the name of the Klingon home world in TNG, simply
because (I don't believe) that they have ever said the name of it, even though
they have been there several times.

>2) When the mention of Romulan Ale being illegal pops up Kirk says they are
>1000 light-years from Starfleet HQ. How long is this movie (their perspective)
>anyway? Even at Warp 10 it would take a full year to get 1000 ly and I doubt
>they were going that fast!

Just an expression, Jeesh!  Like when we say, "I live a hundreds of miles from
nothing.

>3) When the Klingons were under 0 g and were shoot they were thrown backwards.
>Why should this be? A phaser beam has no mass, thus no momentum! By the law of
>momentum they should have stayed exactly where they were 0 g or not.

The pressure that is inherent in the blood stream could have propelled the
Klingon bodies backward in a kind of knock-back effect.  Remember, the blood
is under pressure from the main pump, the heart.

>4) When playing the detective Spock mentioned that an ancestor of his or
>something to that extent once said something along the lines of, "When that
>which is impossible is eliminated, that which remains, however improbable,
>must be the truth". If I am not mistaken it was Sherlock Holmes (fictional?)
>who is given credit for this quote.

True.  Spock is half human.  No doubt an attempt to become more at peace with
his human side.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. David Jansing                 | And St. Anselm held the Hand Grenade on
University of Louisville         | High, saying, "O Lord, bless this thou Holy
Electrical Engineering Department| Hand Grenade, that thou might blow thy
				 | enemy into tiny little bits, in thy mercy."
				 | -- Book of Armaments, Chp. 2, Vs. 9-21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu
Subject: re: Klingon Home Planet
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 15:13:24 GMT

For those of you wondering how to spell Kittimar, I believe that
it is really spelled Khitomer.  OK?  Looks better that way, at
least.  Kittimer/mar makes me think of a home for cats by the sea.
:-)
Did anyone else wonder why on earth (sic) they called it "Camp
Khitomer" in TUC?  Made it sound like a summer day-care center
for Klingon kids.  Come to think of it, maybe that's what it was. 
The only reason I could think of was to tie it to the Nixon/China
comment via mnemonic with Camp David.  Pretty lame.

Kellie Matthews-Simmons
Internet: Matthews_K@CUBLDR.Colorado.Edu
From: nunn@sura.net (Deborah Nunn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: OK, NOW WHO'S THE GREATER SPACE BIMBO?
Date: 24 Jul 92 18:51:37 GMT
Organization: SURAnet, College Park, MD, USA, NA, Earth, Milky Way

In article <18544@drutx.ATT.COM> mlhb@mammoth.dr.att.com (Sky Warrior) writes:
>We've established who is hotter.  Now who is the greater bimbo?
>
>My votes:
>
>1. Kirk
>2. Riker
>3. Troi
>4. Mrs. Troi (Luxwana (sp?))
>
>
>As for who is hotter (female version):
>
>1. Riker
>2. Worf
>3. Data
>4. (Younger) Kirk
>
>
>
>-- 
>-----------------------------                                              
>SKY WARRIOR aka MLH Bonham  | "Good tea.  Nice House." -- Lt. Worf
>mammoth!mlhb@druhi.att.com  |----------------------------------------------
>mlhb@drutx.ATT.COM          | SKY WARRIOR RACING KENNELS - Coming to an
>                            | Iditarod near you!
>----------------------------- 


**************************************************************************
     ___/\            /\   One to beam up, Scottie!
 ___/ *   \          / /     (My dogs made me say it!  Really!)
/          |________/ /
|                    /
\____/\              \     Deborah J. Nunn       | Snail mail:
      |               |    e-mail: nunn@sura.net | SURAnet
      |    _______    |    phone: (301) 982-4600 | 8400 Baltimore Blvd.
      |___/       \___|    fax:   (301) 982-4605 | College Pk, MD 20740
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.current:10899 rec.arts.startrek.misc:7706 rec.arts.startrek.tech:4312
From: ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.tech
Subject: Re: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Date: 29 Jul 92 13:43:49 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <1992Jul29.002108.2708@rtsg.mot.com> svoboda@rtsg.mot.com (David Svoboda) writes:

>Orrrr, maybe Spock IS a descendent of Sherlock Holmes.  I mean, they're both
>fictional characters, after all.  :-)

What?!!!  Spock, a fictional character!  Say it isn't soooo!!!!!!

:-)

-- 
Jorge Diaz                       | "You're outmanned, you're outgunned, you're
Georgia Institute of Technology  |      outequipped what else have you got?"
Office of Information Technology | "Guile."
ccoprdj@prism.gatech.edu         |      -- Riker and Worf   "Peak Performance"
From: smneyln@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov (Michael Neylon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Take 2 aspirin & call me in......
Date: 30 Jul 92 19:31:00 GMT
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Jul30.152824.6598@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>, mueller@cage.eng.mcmaster.ca (Edna Mueller) writes...
>matthews_K@cubldr.colorado.edu writes:
> 
>>In article <7944@dirac.physics.purdue.edu>, hinson@maxwell.physics.purdue.e>du (Jason W. Hinson) writes:
>>> It had nothing to do with the particular song. It was just the fact that
>>> it was continually playing in her head. Nothing she could do would stop
>>> it. It was even there while she slept.  That could drive anybody crazy.
>>>  
>>> -Jay
>>
>>It must have been the dreaded "It's a Small World After All."  Having that
>>song in your head is probably the worst torture known to mankind!
>>:-)
> 
>Ahhhhhhhhh!  It won't stop!  Please make it stop!
> 
>I remember being stuck on the ride through the magic castle at
>Disneyworld with that song palying over, and over, and over for
>about twenty minutes.  I wanted to jump out of the boat screaming!
> 
Thats not as bad as the Xmas store down in Myrtle Beach that plays it
24 hrs a day, 7 days a week.  It is definitely worse, moreso when you
are playing minigolf at JungleGolf next door...

Michael Neylon   aka Masem the Great and Almighty Thermodynamics GOD!
      //         | Senoir, Chemical Engineering, Univ. of Toledo
  \\ // Only the |   Summer Intern, NASA Lewis Research Center
\  \X/   AMIGA!  |          smneyln@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov              /
 --------+ How do YOU spell 'potato'?  How 'bout 'lousy'? +----------
    "Me and Spike are big Malcolm 10 supporters." - J.S.,P.L.C.L
From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: McCoy in TNG
Date: 29 Jul 92 17:36:15 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <712427105@macbeth.cs.duke.edu> kirk@cs.duke.edu (Scooter Corleone) writes:
>Since DeForest Kelly has already appeared on TNG as not-Dr.-McCoy-but-an-
>incredible-simulation,

I've been wondering for a long time.  Why do people insist on maintaining
doubt on whether "the Admiral" in Farpoint was McCoy?  Is it just because
they didn't mention him by name?

Well, if that's the case...

"Whoa, gee, I just realized, they never mentioned Picard by name in
the episode <INSERT TITLE HERE> Maybe... maybe it wasn't him, and that
was an impostor in the episode!  His evil twin!  Yeah!"

Does the fact that they never mentioned the Blonde Romulan by name in
"Mind's Eye" lead anyone to doubt that it was Sela?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu
Subject: re: Times Arrow (spoiler?)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 20:52:21 GMT

Are you all sure that's Jack London?  We were wondering if it might
be J. P. Morgan.  The entrepenuerial spirit seems appropriate.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: wct@po.CWRU.Edu (William C. Thompson)
Subject: Re: Alas, poor Worf
Reply-To: wct@po.CWRU.Edu (William C. Thompson)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 12:33:12 GMT


In a previous article, ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz) says:

>However, when the time to fight does arrive, why does Worf always get his
>Klingon butt kicked????  I think that's what the original poster was asking.
>
>This same thread came up about 6 months ago, and I think the reason given
>was that the writers want to show how powerful an alien is, so they throw
>Worf up against it to show that it's very strong.  The result is that
>Worf ends up looking like a wimp.

Good point.  Too bad that Worf ends up the scapegoat every time.  Data
would make an even better demonstration.  For example, remember when he
was wrestling with the Borg (Locutus?).  He even had a struggle.  Worf
probably got his butt kicked by the Borg - don't remember.
-- 

                        [currently under construction]


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu
Subject: Re: New TNG Characters
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 15:37:18 GMT

In article <7123569413051@neptune.mcs.anl.gov>, deboer@neptune.mcs.anl.gov (Ms. Jennifer L. DeBoer) writes:
> In article <14703@umd5.umd.edu> jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...) writes:
>>
>>What would the series be like if these characters were to depart?
>>Who would be brought on board as new officers?  How would plots,
>>relationships, the command structure of the Enterprise be affected
>>by a re-shuffled cast?
>>
>>Think about it.  Picard, Data, and Worf gone.  O'Brien and family 
>>already departing.  Who does that leave?  Captain Riker, obviously,
>>but what other regulars are left?  LaForge.  Beverly Crusher.  Troi.
>>Maybe Ro Laren.  Maybe even Wesley.  Is it just me, or does this cast
>>need something new added?  What should that something be?
>>
>>Yeah, I know it's a year away, but it's worth speculating about...
>>
> For one thing, I think the new First Officer should be a woman.  All of
> the senior officers in *Command* are male:  Picard, Riker, Data, Geordi, and
> Worf.  The only 2 female bridge officers are a counselor and a doctor:  both
> are in "caring" roles.  Don't get me wrong; I think that Dr. Crusher and Troi
> are fine characters, but I would like to see a woman in a command role.  After
> all, this is the 24th century; with all their talk about equality, don't you
> think the bridge crew should reflect those values?
> 
> Just my $0.02 worth.
> 
> ******************
> Jennifer DeBoer
> deboer@mcs.anl.gov
> ******************


Absolutely!  I've been bothered by the lack of women on the command track
aboard the Enterprise since TNG began.  Shelby was ok, but I'd rather see
someone along the lines of the captain from Yesterday's Enterprise.  From 
what we saw of her, she was superb.  The only _believable_ woman captain
I've seen on ST, either original or TNG.

Kellie Matthews-Simmons
internet: matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu
From: althof5805@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Ladies' Revenge:  The RESULTS!
Date: 28 Jul 92 13:49:58 -0500
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

The results are in!  Thanks to the loyal ST:TNG man-watchers, the poll results
flooded my e-mail and here they are:

By assigning point values to each ranking (1 getting 5 points, 2 getting 4, and
so on...) and dividing the total numbers by the total number of voters, the
places of honor are as follows:

#1 for all time:  Jean-Luc Picard (big surprise) with a rating of 4.47.
#2--Mr. Data (the yellow-man comes through!) with a 2.27.
#3--Spock with a 2.13
#4--Worf: 2.00
#5--Sarek: 1.00

The rest of the crew members ranked as follows:

6--Kirk (0.93)
7--Sulu (0.80)
8--Riker (0.73)
9--Chekov (0.53)
10--Wesley (0.47)
11--tie between Scottie, O'Brien and Geordi (0.20)

Thanks to all who participated in the poll!  Live long and prosper!
--Stephanie
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: stanford@leland.Stanford.EDU (Scott Stanford)
Subject: Re: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 92 04:14:03 GMT

In article <1992Jul25.232742.25810@u.washington.edu> pierrot@milton.u.washington.edu (The Pierrot) writes:
>In article <1992Jul25.172053.24591@umbc3.umbc.edu> cs106b16@umbc5.umbc.edu (cs106b16) writes:
>

>	  
>>3) When the Klingons were under 0 g and were shoot they were thrown backwards.
>>Why should this be? A phaser beam has no mass, thus no momentum! By the law of
>>momentum they should have stayed exactly where they were 0 g or not.
>
>	If you can find in a physics textbook what the composition of a 
>	"phaser beam" is, I'll back you on that.  :)  Otherwise .... if it's
>	some sort of charged particle beam, then it might indeed have mass.
>

Actually, photons, though massless, DO have momentum.  I've forgotten
the exact way to explain it, but we definitely discussed it in Physics
classes (and got to see a neat demonstration where you hang a pan by a
string and set off a flash bulb at it, and it proceeds to go *ping*).

Scott Stanford
stanford@leland.stanford.edu
From: tmike@cmptrc.lonestar.org (T. Mike Howeth)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Alas, poor Worf
Date: 28 Jul 92 04:05:48 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

I think, as Worf realized during his confrontations last season, that it is more
important for each person to be what his mind tells him he is, not what society
expects him to be.

-- 
tmike@cmptrc.lonestar.org                                               __
"Whoever said 'getting there is half the fun'                           \/
    has never ridden in a class 8 probe!"
From: wct@po.CWRU.Edu (William C. Thompson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Poor man's cloaking device
Date: 27 Jul 92 19:28:41 GMT
Reply-To: wct@po.CWRU.Edu (William C. Thompson)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)


If you were a lowly trader out in space, and you weren't as
well off as Starships, what would use for a cloaking device
to evade pirates and such?

Someone suggested painting the ship black.  Nice touch, but
I think if you added the reflective star stickers, it would
be much better.

A possible alternative is putting bushes all over the ship,
so people might be fooled into thinking it's some sort of
space bush, not life as we know it.
-- 

                        [currently under construction]
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: arnold@apollo.hp.com (Ken Arnold)
Subject: Re: Picard's Log Entries--supplemental
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 23:23:49 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Chelmsford, MA

In article <1992Jul17.170650.57309@cc.usu.edu> slp66@cc.usu.edu writes:
>I've noticed that on most (95%) of the shows, Picard makes a log entery and
>gives the stardate.  (Which, I understand, includes the season number (second
>digit).)  Sometimes he makes others during the show. 
>
>This is what puzzles me:  In the additional enteries he sometimes give a
>stardate and sometimes says "Captain's log: Supplemental."  Why the difference?
> What does supplemental mean and why use it?

What puzzles *me* is why he says the date in the first place.  I mean,
you can be answering machines *right* *now* that append (or prepend)
the current date and/or time on a message.  The Trek computers ain't up
to it?

1/2 ;-), 1/2 Sigh

		Ken Arnold
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: cpeterse@cs.ulowell.edu (chrispy)
Subject: Re: Picard's Log Entries--supplemental
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Lowell Computer Science
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 01:36:39 GMT

In article <Bs86Bq.CvL@apollo.hp.com> arnold@apollo.hp.com (Ken Arnold) writes:
>In article <1992Jul17.170650.57309@cc.usu.edu> slp66@cc.usu.edu writes:

>>This is what puzzles me:  In the additional enteries he sometimes give a
>>stardate and sometimes says "Captain's log: Supplemental."  Why the difference?
>> What does supplemental mean and why use it?
>
>What puzzles *me* is why he says the date in the first place.  I mean,
>you can be answering machines *right* *now* that append (or prepend)
>the current date and/or time on a message.  The Trek computers ain't up
>to it?
>

Ah, but it *is* the computers.  They monitor the current events
and synthesize a log entry accordingly, in the _voice_ of whoever is in
charge, whenever neccessary.  Ya, that's it. In fact, the whole system
is based on ai research being conducted by...me...ya...at my home,
on my PC!  The one that I designed!  Ya, That's-the-ticket...


tommy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: wct@po.CWRU.Edu (William C. Thompson)
Subject: Re: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Reply-To: wct@po.CWRU.Edu (William C. Thompson)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 10:41:56 GMT


In a previous article, dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann) says:

>>I wouldn't go so far as to assume that Doyle was an ancestor of Spock.
>
>Would you rather have Spock an ancestor of Sherlock Holmes?

What are you SAYING?  I assume you mean the other way around.  If not,
what are you SAYING?  If so, the point remains, despite being a fictional
character.

>>It seems
>>much more reasonable to pass it off as a universal truth.  Why should
>>it be so surprising that two seperate people said the same thing?
>
>Someone else independantly coming up with the same truth is eminantly
>reasonable; it happens quite frequently.  But with virtually the same
>wording as Doyle/Holmes used?  I don't think so.

That's what Data says.  I don't know enough about Holmes to know if
that's what he said.  Once again, there are writers don't forget, and
they may have been toying with people wanting to believe Spock is an
ancestor of Doyle (lots of fun to imagine).  But I think really it 
was just nothing more than the writer's (you know, the real person
behind the imaginary show) choice of words.
-- 

                        [currently under construction]
From: judson@watnxt2.ucr.edu (Michael Judson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Date: 31 Jul 92 20:13:19 GMT

> In article <1992Jul25.172053.24591@umbc3.umbc.edu> cs106b16@umbc5.umbc.edu  
(cs106b16) writes:
> >4) When playing the detective Spock mentioned that an ancestor of his or
> >something to that extent once said something along the lines of, "When that
> >which is impossible is eliminated, that which remains, however improbable,
> >must be the truth". If I am not mistaken it was Sherlock Holmes

I've read many other posts stating, I assume jockingly, that Sherlock
Holmes was a Vulcan.  Well, why couldn't that which is improbable be
true.  Spock's mother was human, so why couldn't she be a descendant
of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, since it was he who wrote the Sherlock Holmes
stories.  And that would make sense.
From: darsie@eecs.ucdavis.edu (Richard Darsie)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: ZZZZZZZZ
Date: 30 Jul 92 23:03:54 GMT
Organization: University of California, Davis

Yawn. This group sure is boring during the off-season!
Can't wait for fall and more Tim Lynch reviews!

Richard
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Date: 29 Jul 92 06:16:38 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

>In article <1992Jul25.172053.24591@umbc3.umbc.edu> cs106b16@umbc5.umbc.edu (cs106b16) writes:

>>4) When playing the detective Spock mentioned that an ancestor of his or
>>something to that extent once said something along the lines of, "When that
>>which is impossible is eliminated, that which remains, however improbable,
>>must be the truth". If I am not mistaken it was Sherlock Holmes (fictional?)
>>who is given credit for this quote.

I always thought of it as a semi-joke along the same lines as the Klingon's
comment "You haven't heard Shakespeare until you've heard him in the
original Klingon." In other words, Spock was claiming that Sherlock Holmes
was a Vulcan. Both tie in with the racism/culture difference theme of the
movie.

--
Stef                 In the force if Yoda's so strong, construct a
stef@apple.com       sentence with words in the proper order then
                     why can't he?                               /fortune
From: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
Date: 27 Jul 92 06:45:24 GMT
Reply-To: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann)
Organization: University of Arizona

In article <1992Jul26.003819.25520@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, wct@po (William C. Thompson) writes:
>
>In a previous article, cs106b16@umbc5.umbc.edu (cs106b16) says:
>>4) When playing the detective Spock mentioned that an ancestor of his or
>>something to that extent once said something along the lines of, "When that
>>which is impossible is eliminated, that which remains, however improbable,
>>must be the truth". If I am not mistaken it was Sherlock Holmes (fictional?)
>>who is given credit for this quote.
>
>I wouldn't go so far as to assume that Doyle was an ancestor of Spock.
>That is the kind of stretching this board seems infamous for.

Would you rather have Spock an ancestor of Sherlock Holmes?

>It seems
>much more reasonable to pass it off as a universal truth.  Why should
>it be so surprising that two seperate people said the same thing?

Someone else independantly coming up with the same truth is eminantly
reasonable; it happens quite frequently.  But with virtually the same
wording as Doyle/Holmes used?  I don't think so.

-- 
You're traveling through another dimension -- a dimension not only of sight and
sound but of mind. A journey into a wonderous land whose boundaries are that of
imagination.  That's a signpost up ahead: your next stop: the Twilight Zone!