From: mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran)
Subject: Re: Loren and Heather should bicker in person, not on net
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Um, err... I *know* I saw it here a few days ago...
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 03:20:26 GMT

In article <nyikos.725142175@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
>In <1992Dec23.071349.20095@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
>
>>In article <1086@blue.cis.pitt.edu> sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
>>>In article <1992Dec22.153207.4729@advtech.uswest.com> steven@advtech.uswest.com
>>>( Steve Novak) writes to Petey Honey:  
>>>[text deleted]
>>>>It's gonna be fun watching Sue Garvin embarrassing you again.  Welcome 
>>>>back..."Professor".
>>>
>>>Actually, I think that it's going to be Mark Cochran who gets to be
>>>the leader in embarassing PHoney for a while - Nyikos is posting a
>>>lot of medical misinformation in his latest incarnation.
>>>I'd also guess that Steve Adams, Eric Rescorla, and drieux will have
>>>their turns, too, since Nyikos has decided to branch out into
>>>theology.  
>
>Well, yes, I am posting a lot of disinformation by Mark and even
>restraining myself from providing instant rebuttals.  Just a few 
>minutes ago I posted Cycle 3, and I must say, it was awfully hard
>to resist the temptation, but I specifically promised to let Mark
>have the last word [in the figurative sense: I did answer a question
>from him as to where I stand in respect to something] in these first
>three cycles.
>
Disinformation from me? Petey, I insist. Either provide some proof of
this "disinformation" or appologise. I'll stand in line behind
Adrienne waiting. I hope your newsserver is stable... After all,
you've posted *plenty* of articles since your lies were discovered,
and still no appology to her.

>But now, the kid gloves are off.  On Saturday I hope to have "Mark
>Cochran, Master of the Big Lie technique, part 3" ready for your
>perusal.
>
I suspect this will be another article for which you will owe
appolgies. Probably to the entire talk.abortion readership, if your
past record is any indication.

>>>I'll add that there's plenty of material already available - these
>>>guys can have fun even if PHoney runs for cover, er, his rewsreader
>>>breaks down again.
>>>
>>Ain't it just an *amazing* coincidence how that happens?
>
>Why, what did the latest disablement of my netserver coincide with?
>
>Or are you just posting a Lefty-Kaflowitz flame having nothing to 
>do with your perception of reality?
>
>Note to networkers: no fair answering Mark's questions for him.  I 
>want to know what HE thinks I "coincidentally" missed out on.
>After all, he's a big boy, he knows how to answer questions all by
>himself.  He's given PLENTY of evidence of it in Cycles 1, 2, and 3.
>
I think you "coincidentally" miss anything that you are afraid to
answer Petey.
As for "Cycles 1, 2, and 3", why should we care what brand of dog food
you prefer? 
It's rather amusing, but despite your claims, it's not me who is being
labeled a net.liar. Nor am I the one being seriously considered as a
competitor to Reverend Dougie for this years council of net.idiots.

--
                  Mark Cochran          merlin@eddie.ee.vt.edu
These are the views of my employer. They also represent the views of
your employer, your government, the Church of your choice, and the
Ghost of Elvis. So there.
Xref: sparky talk.abortion:52881 alt.abortion.inequity:6169 soc.men:21774 soc.women:21891