HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gumby@cs.mcgill.ca (Phil PRANNO)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Here's my list of bugs...
Keywords: SP, bugs, shell
Date: 6 Nov 92 19:19:08 GMT
Organization: SOCS - Mcgill University, Montreal, Canada

First let me say that I have been using OS/2 2.0 since 6.167 (last
October) and I won't use anything else.  But I am a little concerned
about the number of WPS bugs that were not fixed in the SP.  Here's
my preliminary list:

1) multiple entries int the "create another" menu option.
2) unable to use "settings" button for "Available menus" in
   menu tab.
3) Command ref. and Rexx information not hashed when opened.
4) System clock does not stay across boots.
5) System Error popup (when "drive not ready") can be moved all
   over the screen and it DOES NOT fix the background (ie. have
   many copies of window all over).  Pressing button clears them all.
6) Funny characters in object names (certain dialogs - such as Find)
   when a CR-LF is in it.
7) extra 2 templates (I know this is in the Readme)
8) Network folder appears in TREE VIEW ONLY of boot drive
   under desktop folder EVEN IF YOU HAVE NO NETWORK!. Not in
   icon view though.
9) system clock still has font trouble.
10) DRIVES: "create another" on folder A that has many sub-folders.
    Specify a new name for this folder and indicate parent (A).
    Notice how it has forgotten about most of the sub-folders.
    Refresh does nothing, must reload drive object.

Now for my list of non-shell bugs:

1) Klondike's cards are screwed up.  Most are all red.
2) OS/2 chess has funny boxes around the pieces.
3) French characters under WIN-OS2 are still using wrong
   spacing.  Now they are too close together.
4) JetFighter II get sys3176 "illegal instruction at 00000004".
5) cannot load math emulator EM87.COM in a dos session.  available
   on wuarchive.
6) Star Control completely locks up system (except mouse) when started
   in a window.

However, I do find that WIN-OS2 starts faster, more
VGA DOS programs run in a window (and all are faster), seamless bugs
seem to be fixed, more consistent use of colors, and no more black
icons!

My system is a 386-40 8 meg, ATI XL 1 Meg, VGA resolution.  SP (golden)
installed over un-modified GA installation.
From: tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Todd Henderson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 Trascan Imitation
Date: 5 Nov 92 16:30:08 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.Bx94IC.8Ly
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

andreast@athena.mit.edu (Andreas Turanski) writes:

>In article <1992Nov5.013419.19588@colorado.edu> doug@shako.Colorado.EDU (Doug McKnight) writes:
>>With regard to the whole trashcan business..
>>
>>My approach may have already been mentioned, but what i did was to 
>>make a template trashcan, "tear one off the pad" and when it is 
>>full I just shred the whole trashcan. 
              ^^^^^

You should turn the shredder into a dumpster where you just drop your
trashcan in and get a new one.

Todd
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry)
Subject: Re: Ctl-alt-del bug?  Was: My trip report
Originator: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 09:09:53 GMT

Ken Beal (kbeal@rcx1.ssd.csd.harris.com) wrote:
> 
> 	When I have done this, I ended up losing any changes I made to
> icons, folders, etc. -- things on the Desktop.  Nothing *else* bad happened,
> but that was bad enough (i.e. no files were corrupted, just the changes
> didn't get saved).

I consider that a good thing sometimes. If you hit Arrange by mistake C-A-D
is a very nice way to get a decent looking desktop back.

-- 
Tom J Parry.
Your reality is a figment of my imagination.
From: x90wardell@gw.wmich.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Work Place Shell: The Future.
Date: 11 Nov 92 20:49:23 EST
Organization: Western Michigan University


Dear IBM (if you are listening):

    	New Method of making programs have a certain Icon:

	(This is a suggestion, this doesn't currently work):

	Find Icon you want.
	Click on right mouse button while on icon (object).
	Select copy Object Icon.
	Select the program you want to change icon of.
	Click right button.
	Select Paste Object Icon.

	Done.

	Also, if anyone knows of a way to make all .wp5 or some
arbitrary extension come up with a certain icon (without having
to do trhough each one individually), please postit.

					-Brad





Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: dhinds@leland.Stanford.EDU (David Hinds)
Subject: Re: Video Benchmark (of sorts)
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 06:10:04 GMT

Running the 200-line scrolling benchmark...

CPU: 386SX, 16 MHz
Bus: ISA 8MHz
Video: ATI VGA Wonder 512K, 640x480/16 mode

OS/2 Full-Screen:        2.25 seconds
OS/2 Window, font 8x8:  13.64
                 10x8:  15.055
                 12x8:  16.805
                 14x8:  18.055
                 16x8:  19.89
                 10x6:  31.25
                 12x5:  33.625
                 14x6:  38.695
                 16x5:  40.53

Interestingly, in a 80x25 DOS window, scrolling a file of 200 lines of
60 '.'s took about 8 seconds **independent of font choice**.

        - David Hinds
          dhinds@allegro.stanford.edu
From: hatton@socrates.ucsf.edu (Tom Hatton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Ordering CSD from IBM???
Date: 7 Nov 92 01:47:49 GMT
Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab

mauritz_c@spcvxb.spc.edu writes:
>How do I order the CSD disks from IBM?  I don't feel like spending
>several hours downloading them at 9600 baud.

As has been posted, you can phone 1-800-3-IBMOS2 starting Nov 13,
the cost should be $24.95, according to the announcement.
You can also use this number to join the Developer's Assistance
Program, to get the $15 CD with the beta, compiler, and other
goodies.

Tom
From: burch@rhps.chi.il.us (Lee Burch)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: how do I load 800x600 drivers for win 3.0, 3.1 under os/2?
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 02:34:21 CST
Organization: CrissySoft Incorporated

   maybe i am missing something but I have my OS/2 desktop
running in 800x600 but when I switch to windows 3.1 I switch
back to 648x480x16.  I would really like to be able to run
windows fullscreen with my 256 color drivers.  normally you use
setup in windows to change that but the only option I have is for
networks!  HELP


-- Lee burch
From: zeta%tcscs@idss.nwa.com (Gregory Youngblood)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: CSD install.  Should I gamble?
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 92 11:31:55 CST
Reply-To: srcsip!tcscs!zeta
Organization: TCS Consulting Services


I'm running a straight GA release, NO patches AT ALL.

I'm thinking of adding the Trident seamless 800x600 soon, and the EPSON and
COM 2211 updates as well.

I ran 1024x768x256 before I had a system crash (gsos2pm related), and had
to re=install (my first ever reinstall at that, the GA I got went up and
fine immediately)

With all the clamoring over the CSD that's out, WHY should I update my
system to the CSD level?  The 32bit GRE would be nice, but it sounds as
if it is so buggy it should still be beta testing, and not released.

I want to update my system but with all the errors being reported, I'm not
sure I want to.

Any Advice?

My system:
           AMD 386-33 
           8 megs (80 ns)
           120 meg hard drive (~18 megs free combining all 3 partitions)
           Using TE/2 for terminal, and Waffle UUCICO for USENET/email access
           100% HPFS system

Thanks

Greg


.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.
.   TCS Consulting Services   P.O. Box 600008   St. Paul, MN  55106-0008    .
.   ..!srcsip!tcscs!zeta                 ..!src.honeywell.com!tcscs!zeta    .
.   zeta%tcscs@idss.nwa.com                      tcscs!zeta@idss.nwa.com    .
.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: mlevis@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Mike Levis)
Subject: Re: OS/2 credits secret screen.
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 17:59:48 GMT

In article <1992Nov8.133749.9468@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> sci240s@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Wey Jing HO) writes:
>
>Just thought this may be of interest to some people. There is a secret
>(may not be a secret anymore) combination keys to activate the OS/2
>credits to its programmers under WPS. Just place the focus on the WPS
>and press Ctrl-Alt-Shift-O. Then the screen will clear to show a "beach"
>scene with scrolling names of programmers in a window in alphabetical
>order.

According to the FAQL, you also need to have the optional bitmaps
installed as well.  I think selecting the optional bitmaps unpacks
two files called "AAAAA.EXE" and "AAAAA.MET" to the \OS2\BITMAP dir.

Just for fun, load up "AAAAA.MET" using Picture Viewer (included with
OS/2 2.0).  Now switch to another session... PV updates it's window
in the background.  This does not really do anything except to sample
OS/2's multi-tasking robustness.

-- 
==== Mike Levis   mlevis@ringer.cs.utsa.edu ====
::   ftp ftp-os2.nmsu.edu (128.123.35.151)    ::  .--.
::   for OS/2 software & information.  Get    :: (OS/2)
:::: the OS/2 FAQL in dir /pub/os2/all/faq :::::  ~--~
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: PLEASE SOMEBODY ANSWER THIS!!!
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 17:03:49 GMT

In article <96569@netnews.upenn.edu> spielman@pender.ee.upenn.edu (Terence P. Spielman) writes:
>This is the third timw recently I am asking a question on this
>newsgroup, and hopefully I won't be ignored a third time....
>How do I recreate the extended attribute files on my FAT drive?
>I have Boot Managar, DOS c: and OS2 HPFS D:.  I can view D: via
>icons but c: brings up a window for a split second and then
>disappears.  Could somebody please tell me how to recreate thos "ea ..."
>and "wp.." files.  Perhaps this question should be made a faq (it's not there
>now).

Well, when you ask a question in the FAQ it (usually) isn't answered.
(The other reason a question isn't answered is that the people who
want to answer miss it -- the traffic in this newsgroup is enormous --
or people are genuinely stumped.)

This one is answered in the FAQ.  Run CHKDSK from an OS/2 floppy boot
and you should be OK.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST 2.0g is avail.
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [You picked the right President, America -- Thanks.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: reisert@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Jim Reisert)
Subject: HELP: Service pack with WinOS/2 3.1 Beta
Reply-To: reisert@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Jim Reisert)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation -- Maynard, MA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 22:03:21 GMT


I installed the service pack on top of GA and things are looking
pretty good.  Have seamless Windows 3.0 in 800x600x256 mode with Tseng
ET4000 video.

I then proceeded to install Windows 3.1 beta as if I were installing
it on top of the beta release.  I can get Windows 3.1 to come up in
full-screen, and even in 800x600 using appropriate ET4000 Windows 3.1
drivers from ftp.cica.indiana.edu.

So I modified my autoexec.bat and config.sys files to change
references from c:\os2\mdos\winos2 to c:\winos231 and rebooted, as
suggested by Al (adhir@cugnus.umd.edu).  While everything works as
before, I can no longer get seamless windows applications to run, even
stuff as simple as Windows 3.1 clock.  The system goes into a strange
video mode with lots of horizontal blue lines, and hazy shadows of the
underlying windows.  I restored my config.sys and autoexec.bat files,
and now at least I can get seamless windows running Windows 3.0.

Any idea what's going on, or how to fix it?

Thanks - Jim

--
James J. Reisert                Internet:  reisert@sttng.enet.dec.com
Digital Equipment Corp.         UUCP:      ...decwrl!sttng.enet!reisert
146 Main Street	- MLO5-2/E45	Voice:     508-493-5747
Maynard, MA  01754		FAX:       508-493-1890
From: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca (ochealth)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: how can you have a 32 bit display driver?
Date: 6 Nov 1992 06:21:28 GMT
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca

In article <1dbugtINN509@gap.caltech.edu> hacker@cco.caltech.edu (Jonathan Bruce Hacker) writes:
>
>disclaimer: I know nothing about writing display drivers.  
>
>I do know that an ISA bus is 16 bit.  Therefore, does it not follow
>that for a display adapter plugged into an ISA bus, it is defacto 16
>bit and can never be 32 bit?  So, how do you write a 32 bit driver for
>a 16 bit piece of hardware?
>
>
by that logic, the i386sx microprocessor should be incapable of running 
32 bit software, because it has a 16 bit data bus.

A 32 bit driver is one that is written using the "real" i386 instructions,
that operate with 32 bit registers and opcodes. The ISA bus happens to
be 16 bits wide, but that has nothing to do with the code in the CPU that
operates on the bus. The fact that it is 16 bits wide is a hardware problem,
the hardware logic will require twice as many bus cycles to send a 32 bit
word across it, as a 32 bit bus would require. 
 
>
>
>-- 
>Jon Hacker
>Caltech, Pasadena CA
>hacker@tumbler-ridge.caltech.edu


-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
jpm: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca         
                            Happily using OS/2 2.0 because MS Windows isNT ___
                                                      Insert VapourFeature ^^^
From: sal8@po.cwru.edu (Steve Luzynski)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Questions about OS2
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 23:02:13 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: b61442.student.cwru.edu

In article <96288@netnews.upenn.edu> kwelch@stipple.seas.upenn.edu (Kevin Welch) writes:
>From: kwelch@stipple.seas.upenn.edu (Kevin Welch)
>Subject: Questions about OS2
>Date: 5 Nov 92 16:12:05 GMT
>I'm looking into buying the beta version of OS2 and I would like
>someone to tell me about the pros and cons of the OS.  I have
>4 megs RAM and 128K cache and plenty of HD space on a 40MHz 386.
>
>Any limitations or suggestions as to hardware improvement?
>
>Thanks
>
>
I have a 40Mhz 386 and OS/2 runs beautifully on my machine. I wouldn't get 
the beta unless you absolutely can't live without Windoze 3.1, though. It's 
called a beta for a reason...
What do you consider 'plenty' of space? You should be willing to give OS/2 
around 40 meg of permanent space plus room for a swapfile that can in some 
cases grow to 10M+.
I would definately get another 4 meg of RAM. In spite of everything IBM has 
done with the service pack, it still just doesn't run well in 4 meg. You 
also can't use HPFS unless you have at least 6 meg.

Good luck with your decision. I for one have never regretted for a moment my 
move to OS/2.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Luzynski @ Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, OH
sal8@po.cwru.edu             | voice calls cheerlessly accepted at x2153.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
wanna experience my current state of mind? get 'pretty hate machine' out and
put track 5 on continuous loop play. turn up to the threshold of pain and
leave it on for several hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
time for another beer run. this time i mean it.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: kskapin@csws3.ic.sunysb.edu (Keith T Skapinski)
Subject: Re: How to run wp5.1 for windows under os/2?
Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 15:52:18 GMT

In article <zhao.720895619@unixg.ubc.ca> zhao@unixg.ubc.ca (Jiansheng Zhao) writes:
>
>I cann't run wordPerfect for windows under os/2. Is it possible? What I have
>to do ? 
>Thanks for help.              
>-- 
>Jiansheng Zhao
>Dept. Chem. Eng, Univ. of B. C., Canada. V6T 1Z4


OS/2 came with a patch that can be applied to the Word Perfect for Windoze
.EXE file. The patch program is called WPFIX.EXE, FIXWP.EXE, or something
like that. Look in the MDOS and WINOS directories. It's somewhere in there.
The patch does not affect the operability of WP so it will work under
Windoze or WINOS2.
However, if I can make a recommendation. The original WP for Windoze was
very buggy. Get the interim release that they came out with if you don't
already have it. Call WP.

- Keith
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer
From: cheetham@bcarh774.bnr.ca (Rob Cheetham)
Subject: IBM Developer's Workset/2 - who knows what's in it?
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.programmer
Keywords: info wanted - detailed if possible!
Reply-To: cheetham@bcarh774.bnr.ca (Rob Cheetham)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 13:11:34 GMT

  Has anyone here got the IBM Developer's Workset/2 package
(#10G2995), the one that's on special until April something-
or-other? The price differene here in Canada is pretty steep, 
so if this is a good package I'd like to get it while
the deal's on (reg. $1095, now $445 - to my best remembrance,
so put the flamethrowers down...).

  Obviously it must contain the C Set/2 compiler, but exactly what 
else is in it? Does it have the online API documentation and all that? 
Has anyone used it, and what were their impressions?

  Two choices, I guess - post at will, or email to me at the address
below and I'll summarize.

__________________________________________________________________
Rob Cheetham                       |  Bell-Northern Research, Ltd.
cheetham@x400gate.bnr.ca           |  Ottawa, Ont., Canada
Not BNR's views...

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: Mary.Evans@launchpad.unc.edu (Mary Evans)
Subject: Re: SP crashes more often!! Help!
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 14:19:08 GMT

In article <18941.2af9aeac@ecs.umass.edu> daly@ecs.umass.edu (Bryon Daly, ECE dept, UMass, Amherst) writes:
>Well, I hate to say it, but it seems that OS/2 is less stable for me now than

I read in some IBM document that if you weren't experiencing the problems
that the service pak fixed, then you shouldn't install it.  I wasn't, but
I ignored what was probably excellent advice and installed it anyway.  I
crashed seven or eight times the same day I installed it.  Thinking I had
done something wrong, I began trying some of the things being suggested in
this forum.  Still no luck.

I finally fixed things by reinstalling my out-of-the-box os/2, the kernal
fix that eliminates the swapper.dat problem, and trident's 800x600x16
seamless drivers.  My system is fine, now.

It does *appear* to be a little less *snappy* than (whisper on ..win3.1),
but I have done no tweaking of the config.sys parameters, no notebook
settings or anything else to make it faster.  And that's ok.  I can (and
did) download a 400k file in the background while printing a forty page
document while working on my budget while playing solitaire while . . .

On the whole I'm satisfied.  If IBM does no better than this, I'm still
better off than I was under you-know-what.  |^>

M.

--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: root@rs1.thch.uni-bonn.de ()
Subject: Re: ET4000 CARDS - IMPORTANT INFO
Organization: University of Bonn, phys. Chemistry
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 17:54:32 GMT

In article <1992Nov1.001156.16791@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry) writes:
>Yeah, I noticed this and used selective install but you are right it didn't
>make a difference. I am just worried that when copying all those files from
>the OS/2 GA disks during selective install will undo some service that has
>been applied. Thoughts?
Don't panic. It just takes some fonts, that are not on SP disks anyway.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: 880506s@dragon.acadiau.ca (James R. Skinner)
Subject: Re: 256 Color?
Organization: Acadia University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 11:21:00 GMT

gouvea@zariski.harvard.edu (Fernando Gouvea) writes:

>In article <1992Nov6.130917.1@opie.bgsu.edu> vd208cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:
>>I just downloaded IMSHOW.ZIP from ftp-os2 to see if GIFS would display in
>>256 colors (with the SP and 640X480X256 Tseng drivers).  It loads the
>>image but it is still stuck in 16 color mode.  I know I have the new
>>drivers installed because the scroll rate and video updates of my windowed
>>sessions are now unbearably slow.. :)  

>I tried imshow.exe with the Tseng 1024X768X256 drivers, and the palette
>seems all messed up. The bitmaps don't like one bit as they do if I put
>them on the desktop background...

Ditto for the 8514 drivers...

-- 

-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
        James Robie Skinner        |     Jodrey School of Computer Science        James.Skinner@dragon.acadiau.ca  |  Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada
-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jcyr@bnr.ca (Jean Cyr)
Subject: Re: ATI, we're screaming! (was Re: 8514 dead?)
Reply-To: jcyr@bnr.ca (Jean Cyr)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 20:01:55 GMT

In article <1dd4gjINNbn4@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>, duffy@theory.chem.ubc.ca (Pat Duffy) writes:

|> I identify with the frustration, though.  XGA-2 from Radius for the ISA bus
|> is coming out really soon.  Come on ATI:  Get your act together or you'll
|> lose a customer...
|> -- 
|> Patrick Duffy, duffy@theory.chem.ubc.ca 
|>
 
They've already lost many... I ditched an ATI VGA Wonder yesterday...

ATI = Good hardware, but shitty support.
From: bjorn@ludd.luth.se (Bjorn Fahller)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Executable Flag
Date: 9 Nov 92 20:28:16 GMT
Organization: Lule} Tekniska H|gskolas Datorf|rening - Ludd

In <1992Nov9.170406.4895@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:
[Tim's rambling about case sensitivity in file names deleted]
>retention only.  But this issue has been beaten to death, so please
>don't follow up.)
I won't, but you know what I mean :)

Now for the real issue of being able to run programs if the executable flag
is set, no matter what extention they have, if any at all... 4os2 does it.
I haven't tested this very thoroughly at all, but I've tried renaming an
executable to just it's base name and no extention, and if the executable
flag was set, it could still be executed from 4os2. I think CMD.EXE did not
execute the program. I don't remember if 4os2 executed the program regardless
of the executable flag (that is, took a chance that it might be executable).
   _
/Bjorn.
-- 
Bjorn Fahller     Phone:              |The opinions above are not necessarily
Trollnasvagen 3A  Intl:+46 920 226870 |those of... Hey! Wait a minute. Do you
S-951 61 Lulea    Natl:0920-22 68 70  |seriously expect Me, a student, to carry
Sweden            << space for rent >>|the official voice of the University?