HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bcollins@axion.bt.co.uk (Bill Collins)
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Subject: Re: Hi-fi TV sound?
Date: 8 Jan 93 13:49:43 GMT
Reply-To: bcollins@axion.bt.co.uk (Bill Collins)
Organization: British Telecom Research Labs


In article <1993Jan7.164637.11134@vax.oxford.ac.uk>, wilcox@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
|> Is it possible to obtain, fairly cheaply, devices which pick up television
|> signals and output decent stereo sound through an amp to speakers? I ask
|> because although I can very happily live with a cheap small television's
|> picture (it comes with the house so there's no cost above the licence) I'm now
|> so used to hi-fi sound that a tinny mono speaker grates on the ears. This is
|> especially noticable when I'm watching opera on the box: the voices are
|> horribly distorted and the orchestra sinks into mush.
|> -- 


Maplin Electronics sell a kit which is a complete TV tuner/NICAM decoder/audio
detector for about 140 quid (check the latest catalogue for details). Plug in a 
TV aerial at one end, and feed the output from their box into your amp. Et, voila!

Cheap enough?


Regards,
	Bill Collins

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Tortoise  : Software Development Division, BT Laboratories, |
|             Martlesham Heath, IPSWICH, Suffolk, IP5 7RE, UK |
| Hare      : W.Collins@axion.bt.co.uk     +44 473 642760      |
| Disclaimer: It's MY foot in MY mouth !                      |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: uk.misc
From: anw@maths.nott.ac.uk (Dr A. N. Walker)
Subject: Re: Transport subsidies - Was: Car Parking
Reply-To: anw@maths.nott.ac.uk (Dr A. N. Walker)
Organization: Maths Dept., Nott'm Univ., UK.
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 17:46:24 GMT

In article <14072@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Nick Phillips <nwp90@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
writes:
>It depends who you think is more important, and how good the public
>(subsidised) service is. If you think that people who can afford to
>start up bus companies should be able to make profits [...]

	But the distortion applies even if a group of public-spirited
people set up a service that runs at a [small] loss -- their commendable
venture is at a disadvantage compared with the subsidised service.  If
you want to subsidise bus (more generally, transport) services, then the
way to do it is to give bus tokens (transport tokens) to the citizens
who will use them.  Even better, why not give them *money*?  Then we can
all see up front who is getting how much and why, and we can all choose
for ourselves how we spend whatever subsidy we receive.

>And to answer someone else, road tax does not nearly pay for the roads. It's
>like national insurance - just a token payment which you think goes to pay
>for something specific. Whack the duty on petrol sky-high, I say [...]

	It *is* sky-high.  A typical motorist pays around #100 road tax
and #500 [about 5p per mile x 10K miles, if I've got my sums right] petrol
duty per year.  If I've got the right back-of-the-envelope, that would
equate, over the country, to building 600 miles of motorway per year, even
on very pessimistic assumptions about numbers of motorists and costs of
road-building.  Or a *huge* mileage of road improvements in rural areas,
or removal of accident black spots, etc.  It simply isn't being spent on
that.  It's also more per motorist than the cost per head of the NHS.
You can add in also the contributions made by bus and lorry drivers --
much more per head, as befits their contribution to the maintenance costs
of the road system.

>				     I saw an item on the news the other day
>mentioning a proposal to quarry stone for road-building from out of the side
>of Harris. I'd rather have neither the roads nor the quarry.

	Well, I'd prefer not to have the quarry.  But we need the roads even
without *any* private transport -- or else how does the bus, the ambulance,
the fire engine, the police car get around?  And without private transport,
how do the goods get into your shops, how does the farmer get his produce
to market, how does the washing-machine repair man ply his trade?  And how
do I get a piled-up trolley-load of vegetables from Sainsbury's to my home?

-- 
Andy Walker, Maths Dept., Nott'm Univ., UK.
anw@maths.nott.ac.uk
From: mclo@rtf.bt.co.uk (John McLoughlin)
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Subject: VIZspeak - What is frottage ?
Date: 4 Jan 93 17:34:03 GMT
Distribution: uk
Organization: BT Customer Systems, Brighton, UK

Hello,

Guess who got a VIZ album for Xmas !! The subject line says it all; so, just
what is 'frottage' ? The word was used in the context of an insult or 
obscenity. Any pointers from the suitably depraved ?

Cheers in advance,

John.
Xref: sparky uk.misc:2531 talk.bizarre:44420
From: eo@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Emma Osman)
Newsgroups: uk.misc,talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: Hyphening
Date: 12 Jan 93 11:54:45 GMT
Reply-To: eo@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Emma Osman)
Organization: Laboratory for the Foundations of Computer Science, Edinburgh U

In article <1993Jan11.151904.2536@infodev.cam.ac.uk> gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk writes:
>In article <8141@skye.ed.ac.uk> ken@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Ken Johnson) writes:
>>
>>In article <3363@ucl-cs.uucp> G.Joly@cs.ucl.ac.uk (Gordon Joly) writes:
>>
>>#  Is the word "rape" ever funny? Not in my book. 
>>
>>Then your book obviously isn't the Flanders and Swann Song Book.
>>
>>-- Ken Johnson  "Have some madeira, m'dear,
>>                 The words seemed to ring in her ear,
>>                 Until the next morning
>>                    She woke up in bed
>>                 With a smile on her lips
>>                    And an ache in her head,
>>                 And a beard in her ear-hold that tickled and said
>>                 Have some Madeira, m'dear!"
>>
>>A BEER TOKEN TO THE FIRST PERSON TO XPOST THIS TO
>>ALT.SEXUAL.ABUSE.RECOVERY. 
>
>And two beer tokens to the first person to find the word "rape" in
>this song.  (By the way, Ken, it's "earhole", not "ear-hold".)

Three to anyone who can construct a convincing argument that it is, 
in fact,funny.

Emma




-- 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Emma Osman      |  Show me a sane man, and I will cure him for you.      |
| eo@dcs.ed.ac.uk |                                           - Carl Jung  |
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky uk.misc:2185 misc.misc:4239 comp.misc:4765
From: zlsiida@fs1.mcc.ac.uk (dave budd)
Newsgroups: uk.misc,misc.misc,comp.misc
Subject: Re: ANyone out there still got a BBC micro?
Date: 5 Jan 93 11:14:41 GMT
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre

In article <JRG.93Jan4193118@oak50.doc.ic.ac.uk> jrg@doc.ic.ac.uk (James Grinter) writes:

>In article <dummy.726160716@barney> dummy@cs.city.ac.uk (Dummy login) writes:

>    Simple question, joystick, where do you plug it in? and how
>   do you get it to work.
>    If any BBC(ies) could contact me and I'll explain in a little more detail.

>You will need Acorn joysticks which are of an Analogue design (and
>usually two connected together), and they plug into the Analogue port
>at the rear of the machine. I believe some companies did offer 'atari'
>type interfaces once upon a time, but little software supported them.

I built my own using joystick units intended for radio control from an 
electronic parts shop.  You need to know which pin on the port connects to 
what - it's in the manuals somewhere.


  No Trespassing: 4/17ths of a haiku.     D.Budd@mcc.ac.uk   fax 6040
  Dave Budd, MCC, Oxford Rd, Manchester, England    (44|0)61-275-6033  
Newsgroups: uk.misc,misc.misc,comp.misc
From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: ANyone out there still got a BBC micro?
Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 23:12:09 GMT

In article <dummy.726160716@barney> dummy@cs.city.ac.uk (Dummy login) writes:
: Simple question, joystick, where do you plug it in? and how
:do you get it to work.

In the joystick port.  The fact that you even asked the question suggest to
me that what you've got *isn't* a BBC micro joystick.  BBC joysticks are
analogue and go into the AtoD converter.  It's likely (I'm guessing) you
have a switched joy-stick from some other system?

Anyway, if it *is* the right one, look up the BBC Basic manual under 'ADVAL'
to see how to read from it. If you just want to play games with it, it
should work as soon as you plug it in.

G
PS Comp.sys.acorn.tech is the place to ask if you have real problems...
From: steve@acorn.co.uk (Steve "daffy" Hunt)
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Subject: Re: Video Plus
Date: 7 Jan 93 18:39:06 GMT
Organization: Acorn Computers Limited, Cambridge, UK
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]

David Bisping (dave@yoyodyne.demon.co.uk) wrote:
: I cannot any any circumstances agree with you here. Personaly I think the so
: called teletext service offered on C3/C4 is totally crap. Points

: i) Why for godsakes stick the news service on C4. A News service should be
:   24 hour. What news is on C4 is splatted by the graphics.

Absolutely.  I think the new ITV teletext service is a piece of
complete shit, really downmarket.  I suppose it is to be expected
under a system where the right to broadcast is sold to the highest
bidder.  Teletext UK seems to be little more than a vehicle for
pushing 0898 phone numbers.

The rest of television seems set to deteriorate too.  What I've seen
of Carlton (replacement for Thames TV) has been discouraging.  The
head of Carlton was interviewed the other night and said that they
intended to stick to well-known formulae and avoid risky programmes -
ie, innovation.  It was even suggested that they might make a UK
version of the Golden Girls - ugh.

And according to one of the video mags, Channel 4 is likely to become
more mainstream now that it has to stand on its own feet (apparently
it used to be partially subsidised by profits from the other ITV
companies).

The head of BBC drama thinks that the future of one-off BBC-made films
is under threat from cost-cutting.

So it looks like we'll end up with four channels showing identical
populist crap.
-- 
				Steve Hunt	steve@acorn.co.uk
From: igb@fulcrum.co.uk (Ian G Batten)
Subject: Re: Clangers patterns sought & offered
Organization: Fulcrum Communications
Distribution: uk
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 17:07:02 GMT

In article <1993Jan6.152541.2891@lsl.co.uk> snail@lsl.co.uk writes:
> Daft question, when is it back on TV? and in which TV region(s)?

C4, Friday afternoon (2pm, from memory).  A double bill with The Herbs.

ian
From: bane@vtx.ma.man.ac.uk (Michael!)
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Subject: Re: Drugs
Date: 12 Jan 93 00:53:55 GMT
Reply-To: bane@vtx.ma.man.ac.uk
Organization: Magic Michael's Mushroom Factory.

In article <GRC.93Jan8093911@bhars109.stl.stc.co.uk>, grc@stl.stc.co.uk (Gary Cook) writes:
|> 
|> >   In article <1993Jan7.142137.23932@tadtec.uucp> Tim Steele <tjfs@tadtec.co.uk> writes:
|> 
|> >      Secondly, a friend showed me his toxicology textbook which had a whole 
|> >      chapter devoted to arguing the case for banning alcohol and replacing it 
|> >      with cannabis.  
|> >
|> >      - Alcohol makes some people aggressive; cannabis doesn't
|> >
|> >      - The LD50 for alcohol is less than a bottle of spirits (less than 10x MED);
|> >	the LD50 for cannabis is enormous (no-one has died of it, but 
|> >	extrapolations from mice show you'd have to eat about 300 lbs of it)
|> >
|> 
|>  Yeh ! But you can't drink cannabis can you ? I mean ? what would you do
|> when you went for what used to be a nice social 1 pint drink ..... 
|> Ummm couple of drags of a joint ? Wow ! How refreshing !
|> 
|> Naaaaaaaah !
|> 
|> Give me a pint anyday.
|> 
|> -grc.
|> 
|> --
|>   Gary Cook,                  LL      UU   UU   FFFFFF   CCCCCC             
|>   BNR Europe Limited.          LL      UU   UU   FF       CC   
|>   Harlow,                       LL      UU   UU   FFFFFF   CC                
|>   England.                       LL      UU   UU   FF       CC               
|>   E-Mail : grc@bnr.co.uk          LLLLL   UUUUUUU   FF       CCCCCC ... & PSV.



I can drink a pint a lot quicker than I can roll and smoke a joint;
unfortunately, there just aren't that many places I can LEGALLY go and
chat with my friends over a spliff or two!!!

anyhow, going for a pint or going for a spliff are just ways of breaking
the ice and/or doing a social custom and/or tools to use to make conversation
and/or something to do with yer hands when nobody has anything to say [etc]

Michael
From: simon@pharaoh.cyborg.bt.co.uk (Simon)
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Subject: Re: Drugs
Date: 12 Jan 93 13:26:32 GMT
Organization: One Hundred Pounds Per Second

martin@pharaoh.cyborg.bt.co.uk (Martin Gorman) writes:

>>In article <29979@castle.ed.ac.uk> D I Laurenson, dil@castle.ed.ac.uk
>>writes:
>>>I'd like to see the emetic part - but it is very true that NO DRUGS ARE
>>>SAFE.
>>
>And

>>>Each one must be used within the guidelines dictated for that
>>>drug eg. not operating machinery when on anti-histamines etc.

>Given this qualifier for "safe", can anyone think of a single object or
>activity that is "safe"? Doesn't have to be related to drugs or
>machinery. Anything. If, as I suspect, no-one can, why concentrate on
>drugs? Certainly, when compared with the problems caused by alcohol abuse,
>the risks of crossing the road, the general appallingness of life and
>man's inhumanity to man, it seems a little like passing the buck,
>sweeping it under the carpet, wallowing in a sea of self-delusion and
>other metaphores to put so much blame on a few harmless tokers. Physician
>heal thyself!

I think the argument would go something along the following lines:

1) We "NEED" roads/pollution/cities etc. etc. because they are part of "life".

2) We don't "NEED" drugs.


What most people don't realise is that they confuse the word "NEED" for the
phrase "HAVE NO CHOICE OVER".



################################################################################
# Simon Day @ BT, Angel Centre, London          simon@cyborg.bt.co.uk          #
################################################################################
Disclaimer: These are not necessarily opinions.
From: wdrdjh@thor.cf.ac.uk (Dr D J Harvey 92)
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Subject: Re: Video Plus
Date: 5 Jan 93 12:10:43 GMT
Distribution: uk
Organization: University of Wales College at Cardiff
X-Mailer: Cardiff Computing Maths PP Mail Open News Gateway

In article <1i33muINNm94@cardamom.compnews.co.uk> phil@compnews.co.uk writes:
|
|-rw-rw----   1 phil     iseng       27568 Jun 11 21:07 /vol/src/is/libiseng/restricted/ukgemc.c
|-rw-rw----   1 phil     iseng        5957 Jun 11 21:08 /vol/src/is/libiseng/restricted/ukgemc.h
|
What is this - an ftp site for us ! (:-) 


|: The encoding is proprietary to this company and subject to
|: patent protection.  Listings publishers pay for the privilege of
|: printing these numbers, so it is not surprising the Video+ people
|: are touchy about it.
|
|They pay a lot of money for to publish V+ numbers. One might say several
|things about this, something about selling London Bridge, or why a 'random'
|digit string is easier to key than a time, but I couldn't possibly comment.

I always thought that the whole point of a "patent" was that the info
was publicly available (from the patent office), but that it was _USE_
that was protected by the law - after all, if you can't tell what other
people have invented, how are you supposed to know not to use it?

|phil 
|   ___/   /
|   /_/)  /            Phil Male, Director, Information Systems  
|  / /_ '/  Computer Newspaper Services, The Bishops Manor, Howden, DN14 7BL 
| / / ///    +44 43043 Tel: 1100 Fax: 1108/2022  email: phil@compnews.co.uk

Seriously. nice to have just the right, well-informed person
contributing to the discussion.

Dave Harvey
Dept radiology, Heath Hopital, Cardiff
harveydj@cardiff.ac.uk
Newsgroups: uk.misc
From: mt%calliope.kram.org@calliope.kram.org (Mark Turner)
Subject: Re: Dial up Internet access wanted in West Midlands 
Distribution: world
Organization: Demon Systems Limited / Demon Internet Services
Reply-To: mt@kram.org
X-Mailer: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.18)
Apparently-To: <mail2news@dis.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 23:24:25 +0000

In article <C0Hvz6.EG7@apricot.co.uk> marcusj@apricot.co.uk writes:
>OK, in an ideal world somebody will reply with a number with the following
>service:
>
>Internet mail
>Usenet
>Established service that isn't likely to go up the spot next
>week/month/year
>V.32bis
>Birmingham number
>Seriously cheap!

We have all except the Birmingham number. Call the office for more details.
As far as I'm aware there is no-one closer to Birmingham that can offer
full Internet access at sensible prices.

Regards,

Mark.

-- 
/\/\ark Turner                               Demon Systems / Demon Internet
Office: mark@demon.co.uk (+44 81 349 0063)       42 Hendon Lane, London
Home: mt@kram.org (+44 831 823 212)                  N3 1TT, England
------------------ PGP version 2.1 Public Key available -------------------
*** IP level dial-up connectivity to the Internet for a tenner a month! ***
Newsgroups: uk.misc
From: pete@smtl.demon.co.uk (Pete Phillips)
Subject: Re: New teletext franchise
Organization: Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory
Apparently-To: mail2news@news.demon.co.uk
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 16:19:44 +0000

dominic@natcorp.ox.ac.uk (Dominic Dunlop) writes:

>The service?  Glad you didn't ask.  I greatly miss the programme
>previews and back-up material on channel 4.  Having schedules for all
>channels on channel 4 is an improvement, but does not balance the
>disappearence of almost all programme background information.

Yep - channel 4 used to give a superb programme information service -
down the tubes now of course.  Do they think we will watch *more*
telly if we don't know what the programme is going to be about ?  On
C4, you *need* this info, as some of their titles don't exactly tell
you what you will be watching (or missing).
-- 
--
Pete Phillips, Deputy Director, Surgical Materials Testing Lab, 
Bridgend General Hospital, Bridgend, S. Wales.
pete@smtl.demon.co.uk   0656-652166
From: smee@bristol.ac.uk (Paul Smee)
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Subject: Re: Hi-fi TV sound?
Date: 8 Jan 93 10:05:36 GMT
Reply-To: P.Smee@bristol.ac.uk (Paul Smee)
Organization: University of Bristol

In article <1993Jan7.164637.11134@vax.oxford.ac.uk> wilcox@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
>Is it possible to obtain, fairly cheaply, devices which pick up television
>signals and output decent stereo sound through an amp to speakers? 

Not 'fairly cheaply', far as I know, but otherwise, yes.

Maplin and Arcam (and some 3rd company whose name I can't recall) make
TV-tuner boxes (including NICAM decoding) which stack nicely into a
hi-fi stack.  Not really cheap, though.  (Well, depends on what YOU
think is cheap.)  The Arcam one, at least, also puts out a video
signal, which opens the option of replacing the TV with a tunerless
'monitor' when it finally needs replaced.

Probably cheaper than either of those would be to replace the TV.
*Most* (but not all, so make sure you check before you buy) TVs which
have SCART sockets on the back can do what you want.  A fully-wired
SCART socket includes 'audio out', and you can run that to your hi-fi.
As I said, though, if you do this, make sure that the TV's SCART really
IS fully-wired.

Another possible approach, which we used for ages, is to use a VCR.
Again, most of them seem to offer 'audio out' (but check), and you run
that into your hi-fi.  Leave the TV tuned to the VCR, with its volume
turned right down, and do all your channel switching on the VCR.  You
should probably be able to find a suitable quality used or ex-rental
VCR at a price which would make this the cheapest option.  (If you
already own a VCR, you probably already have everything you need except
a bit of wire -- re-check the manual.)

-- 
Paul Smee, Computing Service, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UD, UK
 P.Smee@bristol.ac.uk - ..!uunet!uknet!bsmail!p.smee - Tel +44 272 303132
From: dhd@exnet.co.uk (Damon)
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Subject: Re: Fast & Cheap Money Xfer to USA
Date: 12 Jan 93 13:21:06 GMT
Distribution: uk
Organization: ExNet Systems Ltd Public Access News, London, UK

In article <1993Jan12.115314.1217@devon.co.uk> mcneill@devon.co.uk (Keith McNeill) writes:
>
>What is the best (meaning fastest & cheapest) way to transfer money to the
>USA (or anywhere else I guess).  Last week I wire transferred money to my US
>bank account.  It cost about $40 in total.
>
>	Barclays charged #17.00 + $10.00
>	My US bank charged $4.00

The TSB tend to charge me about #8 + .5% but it takes variable amounts of
time...

Damon
-- 
Damon Hart-Davis        London, UK        Internet: dhd@exnet.co.uk, d@hd.org

Public-access UNIX (Suns), news and mail for UK#5 per month.  FIRST MONTH FREE.
[1.36] Cheap Sun eqpt.  UUCP news/mail feeds.  Tel/Fax: +44 81 755 0077.
Newsgroups: uk.misc
From: Tim Steele <tjfs@tadtec.co.uk>
Subject: Cable TV Picture Quality
Organization: Tadpole Technology plc
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 15:00:50 GMT
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A771F5B14006A1C3@mac-tjfs.tadtec.co.uk>
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d16
X-Xxdate: Thu, 7 Jan 93 14:58:57 GMT

Here in Cambridge the local cable company issue the Scientific Atlanta 
box, which only has a UHF output.  When I asked them about SCART or CV 
outputs they said "duh? what's that?"

Is this normal?  I suspect it does nothing for the picture quality, which 
isn't that great on a friend's (new, large screen) TV.  (I don't have 
cable yet).

Tim
From: whiskerp@logica.co.uk
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Subject: Re: Mornington Crescent rules anyone?
Date: 6 Jan 93 15:40:30 GMT

In article <C0Fq8x.4F2@exnet.co.uk>, dhd@exnet.co.uk (Damon) writes:
> In article <1993Jan6.095202.27792@medusa.prime.com> richm@CIS.Prime.COM writes:
>>Please, if anyone does really know the rules, and if there are
>>any, could they post them to this group or Email them to me
>>as well. This game has always perplexed me, and everyone
>>seems very coy about it. Perhaps it's a case of the King's
>>invisible clothes, and people don't really know - well Damon?
> 
> Well, shall we tell them?  B^>
> 
You obviously don't realise that London Underground have closed Mornington 
Crescent for refurbishment.

Under rule 147(b) of the new (post Channel Tunnel) rules, all play has to 
be suspended until normal service is resumed. I thought that everybody knew 
that!

Peter Whisker
whiskerp@logica.co.uk
From: rap@bnr.co.uk (Richard Porter)
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Subject: Re: Teletext services (was Video Plus)
Date: 12 Jan 1993 17:34:37 GMT
Organization: BNR Europe Limited
NNTP-Posting-Host: bnsgs193.bnr.co.uk

In article <1993Jan12.110527.4929@alex.com> dave@alex.com (Dave Quinn) writes:
>|> davidf@spider.co.uk (David Fraser) writes:
>|> : On a different tack, I understand that one of the Teletext "standards"
>|> : specifies sub-page selection - particularly useful when you want to see
>|> : page 40 of 40. Does anyone implement it? Are there plans to? Or did I just
>|> : make up the whole thing? Would I need a new telly to use this feature?

>Our Philips widescreen tv has subpage selection. I would hazard a guess that
>all of the latest Philips teletext sets probably have it too.

I use a Ground Control Universal Teletext Adapter which provides selectable
subpage hold. It also holds two pages before and after the one you are
looking at (as well as any with links) which can be useful. I also have an
Acorn adapter on a BBC Micro with the BBC's ATS. It also alows subpage
selection but not with quite the same convenience as the RiscOS desktop.

When it comes to avoiding ads I find the easiest way is to select previous
page and (on the Arc) take off hold.

Richard
Newsgroups: uk.misc,rec.arts.tv.uk
From: nealet@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Neale Type)
Subject: Ariston music for TV Advert
Organization: University of Sussex
Distribution: uk
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 10:57:24 GMT

Does anyone know what the source of the music (cheap sounding computer
ditty) comes from, as I am sure it sounds like an old Comodore-64 game
tune ??

Neale

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neale Type , Computing Service      ///   |  * Current UK Kickoff Champion *
University of Sussex, Falmer    \\\///    |     nealet @ syma.sussex.ac.uk 
England.   BN1 9QH               \X//     |     Tel: +44 273 607418