HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com (Kevin Rodgers)
Subject: Re: Pl explain the Bama penalty in Sugar Bowl
Organization: Steeler Stampede
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 20:20:06 GMT

In article <C0CoAt.n1A@trc.amoco.com> zcjm0f@wwnv67.hou.amoco.com (CJohn Mace) writes:
>In article <1993Jan4.200338.19418@infonode.ingr.com> tjb@emt.b17c.ingr.com   writes:
>>In article <s5ugxk.726172659@sun330>, s5ugxk@almserv.uucp (Girish Kumtheker) writes:
>>|> 
>>|> Can somebody explain the penalty given to bama,
>>|> resulting in a loss of 15 yards ( not that it mattered !).
>>|> 
>>|> I thought there should have off setting penalties, if ANY !
>>|> I mean 15 yards for twirling the football after touchdown ?
>>|> You would call that celebration ?? Give me a break !
>>|> 
>>	I agree except that it is a penalty.  He spun the ball, they
>>	threw the flag.  BUT, Miami's guy that ran in their ONLY touch-
>>	down did the same thing and wasn't flagged.  But then again,
>>	it wouldn't have mattered would it Gino?
>
>It IS a penalty if you do it on a play in which you do NOT score.  You
>can receive the same penalty for spiking the ball or throwing it at 
>someone or throwing it into the crowd.

I thought the penalty for spiking the ball (or throwing it out of
bounds, or spinning it) is delay of game, not unsportsmanlike conduct.
-- 
Kevin Rodgers				kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com
Martin Marietta MS A16401		(303) 790-3971
116 Inverness Dr. East
Englewood CO 80112 USA			GO BUFFS!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: PAC-10 Overrated!!!!!
From: bsutesch@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu
Date: 4 Jan 93 17:09:52 CST
Organization: Wichita State University, Wichita, Ks

In article <1993Jan4.184814.16048@micom.com>, jscott@micom.com (James Scott) writes:
> just a note ...
> 
> in their bowl game predictions, the la times said that the big question
> to be answered in the sun bowl was whether baylor could stay on the field
> with arizona.
> 
> had i not seen the game and only read the la times summary of it, i would
> have thought that baylor won on a combination of the good play of 1 player
> (bonner) and the gadget plays of coach teaff.  guess that was some sort
> of trick defense teaff threw at UA to stop em 4 tries from the 1.
> 
> but, of course ... the pac-10 still rules :-)
> 
> (btw, does the pac stand for pacifist?)
> 
> james
>  

Yeah, I was really pissed at hearing all the trash from Arizona
about how they wanted a "better" team.  Ha!!!  Number 1 defense my
ass!  Too bad A&M couldn't win.

Brian
Go Cowboys!
Go Baylor!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu (I R A Aggie)
Subject: Re: Sugar Bowl Question
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.college
Organization: An Ol Ag surrounded by a bunch of unfriendly Seminoles
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 16:37:56 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.134157.28408@mlb.semi.harris.com>,
dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com (David Head) wrote:

> Say, if you all have good recipes for gator meat, send some of them
> down to Tallahassee.  Seems we have quite a bit of Gator meat on hand
> too!  :-)

It's my understanding that the LSEAUX feauxlks serve a blackened Gator.
And you can get Gator-on-a-stick in Nawlins.

James
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: demarsee@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Darryl E. Marsee)
Subject: Re: Quit pickin' on the poor 'Canes
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 17:11:45 EST

In article <aggie-050193143627@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu> aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu (I R A Aggie) writes:
>In article <1993Jan5.173554.20420@Princeton.EDU>, Frank Bilotti
><frank@wanda.princeton.edu> wrote:
>
>> Bring on the bashing, but as touchdown Jesus said "let he who is without
>> loss cast the first flame"
>
>Hmmmm...and that's Bama.

And also Michigan ...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: atchison@lyre.cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark Atchison)
Subject: tOSU underclassmen in the draft
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 13:08:31 GMT


All local media is reporting that Ohio State will lose two underclassmen to
the NFL draft this week.  More or less as expected, third year sophomore Robert
Smith (running back) and fourth year junior Roger Harper (safety) will forego
the remainder of their collegiate eligibility.

Smith is expected to release a statement through the SID Monday, and Harper is
scheduled to hold a press conference on Tuesday.  Some local speculation has
suggested that many borderline underclassmen may go this year simply due to
the impending doom in the draft process (limited rounds, salary cap, etc.).

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________________
 Mark Atchison, a.k.a. <atchison@cis.ohio-state.edu>; Graduate Student in the
Computer Science Dept, THE Ohio State University (NOT an Ohio State University)
		Any plagiarisms seen above are not my own...
From: murphy@npri6.npri.com (David P. Murphy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami strategy?
Date: 5 Jan 93 19:03:24 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: NPRI, Alexandria VA



>>Thomas lost the ball because he didn't bother to carry it with his
>>left hand, the hand closest to the sideline.  Had the ball been in his
>>left hand, even if Teague knocks it out, it probably goes out of bounds
>>and Miami has the ball deep in Alabama territory. 
>>
>>daveshao@leland.stanford.edu (David Shao)

 >This is exactly correct.
 >
 >dbrown@newssun.med.miami.edu (Daniel Brown)

this is completely inaccurate.  if you WATCH CLOSELY, which i admit 
is very painful for a blowhard, which is probably why they don't do it,
you can see that teague did not "knock it out", he grabbed it.
it wouldn't have made any difference which side the ball was on.

face it, miami, thomas lost the ball because teague took it away.
teague made the play of the game and thomas *fucked* *up*.
of COURSE he could have held it tighter, but being lamar thomas
he was getting ready to wave the ball around before slamming it
to the ground in the end zone.  his ego refused to acknowledge that
anyone could possibly catch him, especially since he was inside the fifteen.

ok
dpm
-- 
murphy@npri6.npri.com 602 Cameron St. Alexandria, VA 22314 (703) 683-9090

              When every one is dead the Great Game is finished.  Not before.
                              --- Hurree Babu, "Kim"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: anthony@panzer.b17b.ingr.com (Anthony Shipman)
Subject: Re: Bama National Champs!
Organization: Intergraph
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 20:21:13 GMT

In article <aggie-040193111418@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu>, aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu (I R A Aggie) writes:
|> In article <1993Jan2.061625.24534@cbfsb.cb.att.com>,
|> campbell@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (Ray E. Campbell) wrote:
|> > 
|> > Well, The Alabama Crimson Tide did what no one thought they would be able to
|> > do in last night's Sugar Bowl.

Not me. I've said since the bids went out that Bama could do it if they came
ready to play football. My only regret is I didn't say it here before the game.

|> 
|> I thought they could win. I didn't expect the margin to be so big. 10-7,
|> maybe. 34-13? Anyone telling me that, I would have had 'em carted off to
|> a mental institution.

Agreed. Even I watched in amazement as Bama backs ran *at will* through the Miami
defensive line.

|> 
|> > turnovers that killed the Canes, namely three interceptions, one returned for 
|> > a touchdown.  I believe the other two ints also led to Bama scores.
|> 
|> I know the first one in the 3rd quarter led to a TD. What's a defense to
|> do? your offense just *gives* the ball to the other guys inside the your
|> own 30 yard line. 

I know you're joking here, but some unbelievers have tried to pretend those
turnovers by the Canes were bad luck. I'm sorry, but interceptions like that are
SKILL, dammit. Not to mention running down a wide-open receiver and taking the
ball from him.

|> 
|> > the Tide's turn to shine.  Congrats to all the Bama fans out there.  You have
|> > one heck of a team.
|>

1OO YEARS OF FOOTBALL GLORY!!

For me, the ultimate insult to the Canes was Bama putting in its 3rd & 4th
strings, and they still stuffed Miami. I can just hear Stallins now "Send in
those benchwarmers so they can have a little experience beating the crap out of
the No. 1 team in the nation." Too sweet.

Anthony Shipman 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jonesk@ur.msstate.edu
Subject: re: Attendence of the Bowls
Reply-To: jonesk@ur.msstate.edu
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 16:39:21 GMT

I went to the Choke (Peach) Bowl and I think attendance
was close to 70,000. Our tickets were $35 each.

Kay Jones
Mississippi State
From: moores@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (Stephen Moore)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Conference Strength
Date: 9 Jan 93 19:34:45 GMT
Organization: Virginia Tech Computer Science Dept, Blacksburg, VA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

Well,well,well!!  I've been waiting for this all year.  When I posted
that the SEC was and always will be the best football conference all
the poor media abused PAC-10 fans said I was crazy and that the PAC-10 was
the best because they played the toughest non-conference schedule.  I tried
to point out that when the teams in your conference are weak then you can
afford to play tougher non-conference schedule.  I pointed out that the SEC is
so tough that its not as easy for them to find tougher non-conference teams as
it is for the PAC-10.  They even said that the guy out in Arizona who
voted Alabama #1 every week was crazy.  They thought the AP poll should
do something to stop that foolishness.
    But now the truth comes out.  The SEC goes 5-1 and the PAC-10 a mere 2-4
against third and fourth rate teams.  But sweetest of all was Alabama's
complete destruction of big bad Miami.  Alabama #1.  Let's repeat that
because I can see from the previous posts that the PAC-10 people are in a
state of delusion and confusion.  Alabama #1!!!!!! SEC !!!!!!!!!  I've read
people spouting that you can't judge a conference by bowl records and
winning percentages.  Then how do you judge the best conference?  By who
has the best uniforms.  The PAC-10 needs to wake up and smell the coffee.  The
PAC-10 teams wouldn't even have a winning record in the SEC(maybe they'd still
have their much coveted non-conference winning percentage!)
    But back to Alabama, Alabama #1.  I think Miami's QB Gino pizza rolls
Toretta should mail back his Heisman trophy.  I almost died laughing
when Teague ran down one of the "fastest men in college football" and then
stripped him.  Nobody in the country outside of the South is even a challenge 
for Alabama.
    SEC #1. Alabama #1.  PAC-10 sucks and sould try high school next year.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: SCHMIDT@LSTC2VM.stortek.com (Jon Schmidt)
Subject: Re: More Bowl comments
Organization: StorageTek SW Engineering
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:27:28 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.024528.24888@dbsun.uucp>
harbison@dbsun.uucp (harbison) writes:
>
>In article <1993Jan4.194733.13960@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>
>kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan4.172127.11958@walter.bellcore.com>
>> kevink@fugitive.soac.bellcore.com (Kevin Klinge) writes:
>> > MOST UNDESERVED BOWL BID AWARD: Sorry Penn State, but 0-5 vs. bowl
>> > teams and 2-5 vs. teams with a winning record shows just what happens
>> > when a NYD bowl bid is extended too early.  I didn't win any of my
>> > pools, but I was able to clean up in that game.  Hey Spiro, we miss
>> > you already.
>>
>> Penn State had NO business being on the field.
>
>Speaking of undeserved accolades, can anyone explain why Penn State,
>with a miserable 7-5 record, is still in the CNN Top 25?  Inquiring
>minds want to know! ?8-)
 
It's the same reason that Washington moved up from #11 to #10 after
losing the Rose Bowl game.  The coaches with ballots in the CNN/USA
Today poll were really voting for Joe Paterno and Don James, not Penn
State and Washington.  You should not take this poll too seriously.
Consider that the trophy awarded to its winner is now named after a
clown, Ronald McDonald.
 
-- 
Jon_Schmidt@stortek.com  Storage Technology Corporation
(303) 673-3581 - voice   2270 South 88th Street
(303) 673-6039 - fax     Louisville, Colorado 80028-5209
From: sw39+@andrew.cmu.edu (Susan R. Wagner)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Fiesta bowl
Date: 8 Jan 93 04:04:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.AfHMc4C00WBN01_qNp
Organization: University Libraries - Technical Service, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Well, now CU is 1-10 in bowl games pretty pathetic!  I for one am pretty
disappointed at the outcome of the Fiesta game.  It was actually a
pretty good game, both teams played ok (from the second quarter thru the
final two minutes anyway).  Actually, most of the stats (except the most
important one - the score) were in favor of CU.  They played pretty
well, and Stewarts turn overs were not really the reason for their loss.
 Heck, the missed clipping calls were not the reason why they lost (CU
should have tackled better and not let him score).  The reason, IMO, was
Coach Mac's sh*tty play calling and time management during the final two
minutes.  What was he thinking?????  Gee lets run the reverse back on
our own 15!   Yeah, were a passing team, so lets run the ball!  He says
that call was not the one he called, but still it was pretty dumb! I do
think that the kicking situation that Coach Mac put CU in is partly to
blame.  Berger only screwed up when he didn't put the kick off in the
endzone so it couldn't be returned.  The missed field goal (even though
it was from the 23) and the missed extra points was the other guys
fault, Blottiox (don't know how to spell his name).  He made NCAA grade
requirements, just not Coach Mac's requirements.  But then on the other
hand, how can he screw up that badly.  He doesn't even have to watch
films or practice as much as the rest of the team.  Just some thoughts 
on the game.

Congrats to Syracuse.  You played a good game in VERY adverse conditions!

Susan
CU fan in Pittsburgh, PA
From: mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the Sugar Bowl from a Miami fan
Date: 6 Jan 93 01:00:26 GMT
Organization: Ramblin' Wrecks from Georgia Tech

jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett) wrote:
} 
}Bull, Gene Stallings saids that Legion in Birmingham is neutral field.
}In the SEC champingship, Gene said both teams had to stay in a hotel,
}and Bama even had to dress in the visitors locker rooms.  Gene must be
}a statistician just like you.

Gene is welcome to say what he likes, but Alabama gets a huge advantage
by playing the SEC championship at home.  And he is certainly not
being a statistician by denying it, because any statistician worth
his salt can see that there is a big advantage to playing at home.
However, those who have studied the effects of the home field advantage
consider it a function of (1) turf, (2) time, and (3) temperature.
Teams tend to play worse on non-home turf, outside their home time
zone, and in temperatures to which they are not accustomed.  The 
crowd factor is nearly negligible.  

So there was a minor advantage for 'Bama, since they are used to
playing on turf and the 'Canes were one hour off by time zone.
Then again the temperature inside the Superdome was closer to 
Miami-type temperatures.

Where you get a huge homefield advantage is in a situation like
the Big 8 champ playing in the Orange Bowl - 2 time zones away,
many degrees warmer than they are used to, and on natural grass
instead of turf, or similarly for the Big Ten champ playing in
the Rose Bowl.

}Bama had the 12Th man advantage. That was a home game for the SEC.  
}That was SEC territory. 

So that's why Miami is afraid to play there?

-- 
Mark Mitchell           Georgia Tech            mm42@prism.gatech.edu

   "Eenie weenie, chili beanie, the spirits are about to speak."
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com (David Head)
Subject: Re: D. Head, awaiting your public reply
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 17:30:30 GMT
Reply-To: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com
Organization: Harris Corporation, Government Aerospace Systems Division


In article 18272@ccd.harris.com, rcj@controls.ccd.harris.com (Robert C. Jordan) writes:
>
>Just waiting your public humiliation about the Sugar Bowl.
>
>Roll Tide
>National Champs!!!
>
>That makes 12 in just 100 years of football, not to bad if I say so myself.
>
>                                   
>                                         ROLL TIDE ROLL
>                                         
>                                         Chuck Jordan
>

Already done.

I believe if you'll look 13 articles back from your posting, you will find
my "public humiliation" article.  I gave Alabama their due for knocking off
Miami and winning the toughest conference this year (5 wins in 6 bowls).  Of
course FSU benefitted from 'Bama's win too; we had another top 4 finish and
this time finished ahead of Miami in the final polls.

By the way, if you thought for a second that I am a 'Canes fan, you were
DEAD wrong.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: niebuhr@bnlux1.bnl.gov (david niebuhr)
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the Sugar Bowl from a Miami fan
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 02:17:29 GMT

In article <448@rd1.interlan.com> tonyf@rm1.interlan.com (Tony Fernandez) writes:
>Some thoughts on the Sugar Bowl from a Miami fan:
>
>The game was a major disappointment, not just because we lost but also because
Not for me.

>it seemed that the team was not prepared to play.  I have to admit that I
>didn't think that Alabama could move the ball on Miami.  

Ah, an honest Miami fan.
>
>I hope no more Miami quaterbacks win the Heisman.  However, a lot of the

Me too.

>comments in the net I have seen on Gino seem completely uncalled for. 

Why not?  He's just as much a blowhard as the rest of the team.

>Whether or not he is a good pro prospect or how he performs in the NFL is
>completely irrelevant to the Heisman.  

Agreed.

>A lot is said about Miami's home field advantage when they play in the
>Orange Bowl, but no one seems to care that the SEC enjoys the same
>advantage when they play in the Sugar.  At least Miami doesn't play in
>the Orange every year.  And the Sugar bowl was louder than the Orange
>was last year.

Because Miami has the ownership rights to the Orange Bowl; the Sugar
Bowl, as a stadium, is shared by a bowl game and the New Orleans Saints.

>There is no doubt about it, they way to beat Miami is to force them to
>commit a lot of turnovers.  

All games can be won this way, why should Miami be any different than
Podunk University in this category.

>
>Well, Bama fans, enjoy your championship.  Miami will be playing for #1
>again next year, will you?
>

What are the odds not counting media bias?

>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             1993 Florida Marlins Opening Day Countdown:  127 days             
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ah, them and the Rockies.  May they both surpass the 1962 Mets in
losses (100) in their first season.  They both will be the lesser solely
because they didn't have the Marvelous Marv Thronberry on first base and
Choo-Choo Coleman also.

They are already on the down side since they won't have the legendary
late Casey Stengel as a manager (may he rest in peace).

Dave 
-- 
Dave Niebuhr      Internet: niebuhr@bnl.gov / Bitnet: niebuhr@bnl
Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973  (516)-282-3093
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfrederi@encore.com (Justin Frederich)
Subject: Re: Miami Sugar Bowl Question
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 23:36:46 GMT

acdendy@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (ROGER DENDY) writes:

>In article <aggie-080193123041@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu>, aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu (I R A Aggie) writes...
>>In article <8JAN199309533217@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov>,
>>acdendy@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (ROGER DENDY) wrote:
>> 
>>> I can see that the off-season is already in full swing.
>> 
>>I *suppose* we can discuss the senior bowls coming up...
>> 

>I thought we could continue to find reasons why Miami was never as good as 
>they claimed to be for, oh, another 3-4 months.  Then the mascots and sweet 
>tea and aggie/t-sip threads would start up again. 

>Of course, since there are senior bowls, has anyone got the rosters?  These 
>things are never any fun to watch except to see how your own team's guys do, 
>and I never know ahead of time whether to bother tuning in.

>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>     But that's just MY opinion.	Roger Dendy
>     acdendy@convx1.lerc.nasa.gov	Analex Corp.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>	"We don't need any characters hangin' around to 
>	 give the joint atmosphere."
>--------------------------------------------------------------------


I heard that Gino and Lamar were invited. You may want to tune in for
additional ammo - hell it may take you up to start of football season.

Justin - how do you get those feathers out of your teeth - Frederich


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tjb@emt.b17c.ingr.com (Tony Bowman)
Subject: Re: Trying to discredit Alabama
Reply-To: tjb@emt.b17c.ingr.com  
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 20:08:16 GMT

In article <aggie-050193104712@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu>, aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu (I R A Aggie) writes:
|> In article <79116@hydra.gatech.EDU>, gt6249c@prism.gatech.EDU (Bin Chen)
|> wrote:
|> 
|> > But can you blame them?  After almost a month of posts from Miami
|> > fans saying how they were going to blow us out, shred our defense,
|> > stuff our offense, etc.  Turnabout is fair play.  a little trash 
|> > talk isn't going to hurt anyone.
|> 
|> I see. I thought the Bama posters would have more *class* than the
|> Miami posters and not talk trash. I must have been mistaken. From
|> here, I can't tell the difference between the two anymore. 
|> 
|> A shame.
	Hold it my misled friend !!!!  There is on MAJOR difference.  We
	(Bama) did our wuppin' first then we talked.  Miami talked alot
	but never "put up"!!

	ch"A"mps	34
	ch"UM"ps	13

	Besides, Most of our posting are in fun and include some smileys.
	Can the 'canes say the same? 8^)
-- 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
^  Tony Bowman                  | R      	|      _**_                  ^
^  System Support               |  O  T         |     /     :-IIIIIIIIIIII   ^
^  Intergraph Corporation       |   L  I  R     |   >: 723 :--------------\  ^
^  phone: (205)730-1507         |    L  D  O    |   +-(O)----------(O)---+   ^
^  email: tjb@emt.b17c.ingr.com |        E  L   |     FF/EMT Harvest VFD     ^
^  or bowman@infonode.ingr.com  |            L  | What if Volunteers Didn't? ^
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: aggie@wealthy.ocean.fsu.edu (I R A Aggie)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Bama National Champs!
Date: 4 Jan 93 16:41:40 GMT
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.college
Distribution: usa
Organization: An Ol Ag surrounded by a bunch of unfriendly Seminoles

In article <1993Jan2.061625.24534@cbfsb.cb.att.com>,
campbell@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (Ray E. Campbell) wrote:
> 
> Well, The Alabama Crimson Tide did what no one thought they would be able to
> do in last night's Sugar Bowl.

I thought they could win. I didn't expect the margin to be so big. 10-7,
maybe. 34-13? Anyone telling me that, I would have had 'em carted off to
a mental institution.

> turnovers that killed the Canes, namely three interceptions, one returned for 
> a touchdown.  I believe the other two ints also led to Bama scores.

I know the first one in the 3rd quarter led to a TD. What's a defense to
do? your offense just *gives* the ball to the other guys inside the your
own 30 yard line. 

> the Tide's turn to shine.  Congrats to all the Bama fans out there.  You have
> one heck of a team.

Indeed. It was an *awesome* game to attend!

James
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college