HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: harrisl@equinox.unr.edu (Larry Harris)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Americas Team
Keywords: COWBOYS
Date: 9 Nov 92 01:48:14 GMT
Organization: University of Nevada, Reno

In article <1992Nov4.013810.24956@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>In article <1992Nov03.223402.26647@bnr.ca> emilio@crchh444.BNR.CA (Emilio Rivera) writes:
>[ text deleted ]
>>
>This is not a bash, nor am I a 'Boys fan. As you stated, the
>media attached the title, but "America" never voted, i.e.,
>a vote was not used to designate the 'Boys as "America's Team".
>I suppose this is the main reason I, as an American, disliked
>the Cowboys all these years. Just my $25.00 worth. :-)
>-- 
>  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	

Ditto, John....Ditto!
BTW, anybody want to up this to $75.00 worth?  
__

   Most fight fans would not spend a dime to watch
   Van Gogh paint Sunflowers, but they would fill
   Yankee Stadium to see him cut off his ear......

           Pat Putnam - Sports Illustrated
__

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jimarcey@eos.ncsu.edu (JOEL IAN MARCEY)
Subject: Re: FOOL? Buffalo Univ.
Originator: jimarcey@c00091-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: jimarcey@eos.ncsu.edu (JOEL IAN MARCEY)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 22:00:59 GMT


ARE YOU A FOOL?

What are you thinking?

You go to a great university and you are in the heart of the best city in the
	world and you DARE root for our archrivals.....The dolsquishes.

Coming from Ft. Lauderdale myself, after living in Buffalo for 8 years, I can
 	relate to the Hurricanes because Buffalo does not have a division I
	college team. Believe you me I would be rooting for it if there was


We know the HURRICANES are going to be number one as they will smash Alabama in
	the Sugar Bowl.. HELL YEAH, BABY. 

But I do believe you should consider you NFL team.....

I really don't think you are a fool, but I do think you have been brainwashed
	or something. 

Also do not jump on the Steeler bandwagon just because they are starting to do 
	well.... that is not cool.... I was a Bill fan during there 1984-1985
	2-14 season.... and I likedthe Hurricanes as soon as moved down to 
	Florida....when I was nine, not knowing how good they really were.
	However, Jim Kelly went there so I guess it was destiny for me to like 
	Hurricanes. So I am not a bandwagon team

Talk to you later?





					Signed:
					#1 Bills Fan
					(I remember Joe Ferguson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Subject: Re: Cheap Shots
Organization: Houses of the Holy
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 15:18:56 GMT

In article <27000132@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>, divitt@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Mark Divitt) writes:
> 
>     I can't remember the last time I saw SO MANY cheaps shots as I saw last
>     night on MNF (9'ers vs. Falcons).  One team showed up to play and the 
>     other team showed up to hurt people.  Hmmmmm, you must be saying to 
>     yourself, which team is he refering to?     NOT!!!!  I think that the 
>     game (excuse to hurt players on the other team, depending on your 
>     perspective) showed, once again, which team is class and which team is
>     ALL TALK AND CHEAP SHOTS.  I think the non-optimal ;-) team had better
                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I think the term success-challenged would be more politically
correct in this case.


-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
From: kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Chargers' injuries...
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:28:22 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: what.. me.. organized?


..keep mounting.

In the KC game,

DE Grossman: Ankle, gone 2-3 weeks.
WR Lewis: Hip flexor, gone 2-3 weeks.
RB Butts: Cramps, will play next Sunday in Cleveland.

Rest,

RB Bernstine: Shoulder, gone for the season.
RB Bienemy: Nicked up for KC game, suited up but didn't play. He will play
next week.


Grossman and Lewis will miss at least 2 games.



_______________________________________________________
| Prashanth                    |                      |
| U. of California @ San Diego | prash@raman.ucsd.edu |
#######################################################
From: rex@cs.washington.edu (Rex Jakobovits)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: sick Young
Date: 5 Nov 92 23:31:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: beaver.1992Nov5.233118.2968
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle

Does anybody have news about Steve Young?  Is he over the flu and
ready to play sunday, or is it still questionable?

  --rex


-- 
	Rex Jakobovits (rex@cs.washington.edu)
	Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering
	University of Washington
Organization: Freshman, MCS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 10:18:00 -0500 
From: Erik Karl Witte <ew2r+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Upcoming Draft
	<1992Nov12.004434.1325@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro

Excerpts from netnews.rec.sport.football.pro: 11-Nov-92 Re: Upcoming
Draft Dan Kester@mte.ncsu.edu (1346)

> 	How about Faulk to someone?  Maybe Phoenix?


Faulk is a sophomore and probably won't enter the draft.  Read the
recent SI article on him if you want to know more about him.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ADRIENE@YaleVM.ycc.yale.edu (ALN - GO GIANTS)
Subject: Re: 49ers Kick ASS AGAIN!
Organization: Yale University
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 12:47:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.052154.19541@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
>Subject: 49ers Kick ASS AGAIN!
>Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 05:21:54 GMT

>Does the score 41-3 indicate an ass whooping? Well,
>in reality the lame Falcon gave away 6 TO's and
>that is not going to help any team win games in the
>NFL. The Saints and Niners are heading for a 
>showdown. Any of these two teams can go all the
>way at this juncture for the NFC, IMHO.

>It is hard for me to give an accurate analysis
>of the Niners D, because the Falcons were totally
>lame out there, or were they. The Stats department
>was not all that glorious, but the score sure was.

>Do the Falcons truly SUCK as bad as they looked on
>fucking MNF?
>-- 

Besides the fact that they DO suck, check the numbers, they we'rent that 
bad, it was the TURNOVERS that put the nails in the coffin.

I guess that means you can keep your hog.
Adriene L. Nazaretian            G         Nazaretian-Adriene@Yale.Edu
Sr Technical Specialist       G  I         Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.CIS.YALE.EDU
Computing and Info Systems    O  A         Adriene@YALEADS.BITNET
Yale University                  N         Adriene@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU
175 Whitney Avenue               T         Voice (203) 432-6683
New Haven, CT. 06520             S         FAX  (203) 432-6165
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: PANU@vm.acs.unt.edu (Panu Sittiwong)
Subject: Re: Cowboys steamroll over Lions
Organization: University of North Texas
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 14:41:27 GMT

In article <BILLMS.92Nov9124150@dip.eecs.umich.edu>
billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
 
>
>In article <2822@devnull.mpd.tandem.com> dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch) writes:
>
>[lions summary delted]
>
>   Not a whole lot more to say.  Next up is the Rams, at Dallas.
>
>   Daniel Welch
>
>Nice win.  Lions then Rams?  You guys must be getting bored, huh?
>
>Bill
 
Actually, the  game with the Rams will be interesting since they
probably using the same offensive playbook.  Norv Turner, Dallas's
Offensive Coordinator came from the Rams.
 
Panu.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cavitate@milton.u.washington.edu (Ronald Roy)
Subject: FFL Question for S.D. fans
Summary: Question about who is #2 receiver for Chargers.
Organization: University of Washington
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 20:21:50 GMT

Hello,

I have two injured receivers on my fantasy football team,
and need to pick up some backups who will do well toward
the end of the season. We only get points for yards.

My question is this:
As A. Miller begins to draw more double coverage, who
will emerge as the #2 receiver for the Chargers - 
Lewis or Walker (I think they are both receivers).
I know Harmon is the #2 receiver, but I need someone
who is listed as a receiver.

If you reply by e-mail: adam@anchor.apl.washington.edu

Thanks in advance for any help.

Adam Calabrese

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,rec.sport.football.college,rec.gambling
From: west@esd.dl.nec.com (Mike West)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Lawrence Taylor
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:36:51 GMT
Organization: NEC America, Engineering & Support

From article <-vaqt7j@lynx.unm.edu>, by jawebb@hydra.unm.edu (james webb):
> 	I'm suprised that there hasn't been more postings about Taylor's career
> ending injury. Being taken out of Giant stadium on a golf cart isn't really
> the way to end one of the greatest careers in pro football history. I've
> never really cared for the Giants much, but we're talking about one of THE
> greatest players to ever play the game, and maybe the greatest defensive
> player that will EVER play the game.

This reminds me, was it LT or Carl Banks that ended Joe Theismann's (sp)
career on a Monday night game?  (And I do *not* mean to imply that it
was a cheap shot.  It wasn't.  It was just bad fortune.)  I do remember
that it was LT that first realized the severity of the problem and
frantically waved the Redskin trainers over.  If it was LT, what an
ironic end too.

Mike West
west@esd.dl.nec.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood)
Subject: POOL - Picks for Week #10 (repost)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 04:16:54 GMT

Week 10
-------

PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK THE FORM BEFORE MAILING IT!

Mail this form to davewood@cs.colorado.edu with the word "picks" in the
subject line.  Be sure to choose one and only one team for each game.  Mark
your choice with an 'x' in the appropriate box.  Put your initials after the
word "Initials:" (ON THE SAME LINE!) at the bottom of the form.  If you have
questions about this form, send them with the subject "fbproblem."  If you
still need to sign up, YOU MUST SEND A SEPARATE MESSAGE with the word
"signup" in the subject line.  Do not reply to this message unless it is to
send in your picks.  See the Rules/Signup post for more information.

WEIGHTS: Assign 10 points to 4 different games.
	 Assign  7 points to 5 different games.
	 Assign  5 points to 5 different games.

This form is due at 10 am PST (5 pm GMT) on Sunday, Nov 8.  NO EXCEPTIONS!

DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE!

 WT  Away                       Home
*------------------------------------------------*
[  ] [ ] Dallas			[ ] Detroit           
[  ] [ ] Green Bay		[ ] NY Giants      
[  ] [ ] Minnesota		[ ] Tampa Bay      
[  ] [ ] New Orleans		[ ] New England  
[  ] [ ] Cleveland		[ ] Houston        
[  ] [ ] LA Raiders		[ ] Philadelphia  
[  ] [ ] Miami			[ ] Indianapolis       
[  ] [ ] Phoenix		[ ] LA Rams          
[  ] [ ] Washington		[ ] Seattle       
[  ] [ ] NY Jets		[ ] Denver           
[  ] [ ] Pittsburgh		[ ] Buffalo       
[  ] [ ] San Diego		[ ] Kansas City    
[  ] [ ] Cincinnati		[ ] Chicago       
[  ] [ ] San Francisco		[ ] Atlanta    
                               
Initials: 

DID YOU PUT YOUR INITIALS ON THE SAME LINE AS THE WORD INITIALS???  PLEASE DO!

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Rex Wood -- davewood@cs.colorado.edu -- University of Colorado at Boulder
  BRONCOS!!        R.S.F.P. Internet Football Pool Organizer        BRONCOS!!
                            Owner, Boulder Houlders
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: martens@python.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens)
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Organization: Ohio State U. Dept. of Computer Science
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 15:42:23 GMT

In article <0096372D.02AF5760@vms.csd.mu.edu> 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu writes:

>Worstmove :Releasing Lofton and Harris

Actually, both were traded, not released.  Green Bay could
*really* use Lofton right now, but they have yet to miss Harris:
Bennett and Harris play the same position, and Bennett's both
better and younger.

-- 
	Bad grammar is the leading cause of slow, painful 
	death in North America -- Dave Barry

-- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)
From: v130pwbq@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: JGH computer rankings
Date: 12 Nov 92 19:33:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <BxMAwq.17o@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes...
>In article <1992Nov11.164053.15434@macc.wisc.edu>, heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes...
>>Week 11: No change in top 7.  (Steeler fans are not going to be 
>>happy.)
>>                            Last
>>Rank   Team         Rating  Week
>> 1     Cowboys        90     1
>> 2     Eagles         84     2
>> 3     Saints         82     3
>> 4     Vikings        80     4
>> 5     49ers          79     5
>> 6     Redskins       72     6
>> 7     Bills          70     7
>> 8     Dolphins       65     9
>> 9     Chiefs         61    12
>>10     Broncos        61    10
>>11     Oilers         56     8
>>12     Steelers       56    11
>>13     Giants         52    14
> 
>How can Buffalo be seventh!  They are a better team than the Saints,
>Vikings, and Eagles.  The 49'ers are better than these teams too.
>The Redskins are not better than the Bills.  Here is my top 10 from 
>top 13.
> 1) Cowboys
> 2) 49'ers
> 3) Buffalo
> 4) Miami
> 5) Vikings
> 6) Saints
> 7) Giants
> 8) Redskins
> 9) Steelers
>10) Oilers
> 
>Bruce, a Bills fan.

Unless the Bills are able to go down to Miami and beat the Dolphins Monday Night
they are No way better than the Dolphins at this point in the season. Less you
forgot that the Bills were POUNDED at home by the Dolphins this season. 

Nuff said!!!

    _____________________________________________________________________
   |   Miami Dolphins and Hurricanes:        * Eric Orologio " Dr. O"    |
   |   Two of the Best teams in Football!    * V130pwbq @ubvms           |
   |_____________________________________________________________________|
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mbrockma@bank.ecn.purdue.edu (Matt Brockman)
Subject: Re: JGH computer rankings
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:54:27 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.155033.12068@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>In article <1992Nov11.172402.13884@ultb.isc.rit.edu>, txa4331@ultb.isc.rit.edu (T.X. Agrawal) writes...
>
>>In article <1992Nov11.164053.15434@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>>>Week 11: No change in top 7.  (Steeler fans are not going to be 
>>>happy.)
>>>                            Last
>>>Rank   Team         Rating  Week
>>> 1     Cowboys        90     1
>>> 2     Eagles         84     2
>>> 3     Saints         82     3
>>> 4     Vikings        80     4
>>> 5     49ers          79     5
>>> 6     Redskins       72     6
>>> 7     Bills          70     7
>> 
>>BILLS AT # 7 ????????????????? You must be a nut-case, or rather you 
>>and your computer. Bills are nothing less than a number 1 team. As 
>>Thurminator said, after losing 2 Super Bowls they are gonna win 2 in
>>a row.
>
>Either you forgot the smiley on this message or this is an attempt at 
>a reverse-woop-jinx.  (The football gods never fall for those.)
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

These jinxes are beginning to sound more like slam dunks!
From: aa05@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ABDULMALIK A. ALHUSSEINI)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Best in Tejas, part II
Date: 10 Nov 92 23:40:49 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1689AF36A.ISTRE-A@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>, istre@ricevm1.rice.edu writes:
>In article <2829@devnull.mpd.tandem.com>
>dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch) writes:
>
>>
>>Any Oiler fans want to continue the "Best in Texas" argument?  My, but those
>>Browns are pesky.  Hey, Pardee, you're supposed to *win* those divisional
>>games.
>>
>>Heeheeheehee.
>>
>>Daniel Welch
>
>If you want to argue based on the raw talent on both teams, it is obvious
>that the Oilers are the better team. I do not feel that Troy Aikman can
>hold a candle to Warren Moon and I can go on and on across the board.
>However, if this arugument is over who is playing better right now, it is
>very obvious that is the Cowboys. They are 8-1 right now because they are
>HUNGRY and out on a mission. They are doing everything right as opposed to
>the Oilers. The Oilers are just simply repeating their past history which
>I mentioned last week. Each year, they manage to lose at least two games
>that they SHOULD NOT LOSE.

So, you say the cowboys are winning because they are hungry! Could you tell
me why the Oilers are FULL? Maybe the won the superbowl and I didn't know it.
The Oilers should be the hugriest (sp?) team in NFL becuase most of their key
players are old. 'Now or never' applies to the Oilers more than any team.
Actually, your 'HUNGER' theory works against your argument becuase the cowboys
are young and if they don't do it this year they still have plenty of
time. The 90's have just started.
>
>As for yesterday, The Browns simply prepared well and played well. As much
>as you gloating Cowboys' fans might rather not admit it, the Browns would
>have beaten anyone yesterday including the 'boys. The Oilers and the Browns
>will meet again on December 20; We will see what happens then. I hope for
>the Oilers' sake that they get their act together by then. As for the Cow-
>boys, we will see if they can keep up the excellent level of play they have
>shown this year. If not, you Cowboys' fans who are chuckling right now will
>have eat your words.
>
So, you already know that the Oilers are inconsistent. You are right about
the talent level in Houston, on paper the should win, the problem is
incosistency. I think this is why the Oilers don't win on the road. I have
seen teams like this in the past. Not long ago (maybe 4 years back) the
Seahawks were good on paper, the problem is they didn't win on a consistent
basis. One week they would blow Denver or LAR by 30+ points and next week
loose to a weak team. They kept doing it for a number of years till their key
players (Largent, Warner, Easily, etc) either retired or injured, then they
hit a downhill. Looks like the Oilers are doing the same. At the begining of
this season, I thought that the Oilers will get their act together and start
winning but it didn't happen.

Malik..... Go Cowboys......
From: un032221@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Hey Vito
Date: 9 Nov 92 20:29:08 GMT
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <Bwx54D.LuB@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Face In The Sky) writes:
> Fuck you, buddy.

	A: Who's Vito?
	B: What did Vito do to deserve this, and
	C: What's this got to do with Football?
	-Skins fan that thinks Ryp sux.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: scmattic@IASTATE.EDU (Felix the Cat)
Subject: Programming (was I'm gonna rip Greg Gumble's head off!!!
Reply-To: scmattic@IASTATE.EDU (Felix the Cat)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 02:48:15 GMT

I also hate the descisions made about which games to watch.
I live in Ames, Iowa (Des Moines viewing area)

Usually all we get are NFC central games and KC games.
I guess we should see some regional coverage, i.e Minnesota & K.C., but I get
sick of seeing every   &*(^(*&%    GB, Detroit,  and Chicago game. We never seem
to get the Prime weekly matchups (last week's Buffalo vs. Steelers, next week's
SF vs. Saints etc.) 

The maddening thing is that Waterloo Iowa, a relatively small town, ALWAYS seems
to have the games we want to see. 


Oh, Well, I guess that's what NFL Primetime on ESPN is for.


Go Saints---God's favorite team.
From: chf0@roger.gte.com (Curtis Fennell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The AFC--Bills Dolphs Steelers
Date: 6 Nov 92 13:36:10 GMT
Organization: GTE Laboratories

In article <1992Nov5.202530.3836@ultb.isc.rit.edu> sbs9276@ritvax.isc.rit.edu writes:
>      I'm curious as to the opinion of the Dolphins fans out
>there. They seem to be in really tough shape-- losing two games
>to less than great teams as they head into the hardest part of
>their schedule (Bills, 49ers, Hou, Den, Raiders). 

The next two games will tell the tale.  If they beat both the Colts
and the Bills, they will be in good shape to win the AFC East and they
will have their confidence back.  If they lose to the Bills, they will
probably still go to the playoffs, at least as a wildcard.

If they lose to the Colts, I doubt that they'll beat the Bills and
they'll be lucky to scrape together a wildcard berth in the playoffs.

I seriously believe that this team is the most talented Dolphin team
that we've seen since 1984.  However, the defense is very young and is
still making mental errors.  Also, the defensive line still needs
improvement.

The offense is as good as any in the league - when they are playing up
to potential.  They've gotten a little cocky lately and I think that
they had started to believe (especially after the Falcons and
Patriots) that they were going to win just by showing up.  So when the
breaks didn't go their way against the Colts, they were really shocked
and didn't recover until the second half against the Jets.
Unfortunately, it was too late to win against the Jets.

Curt
--
Curt "I always pick the Dolphins - even against Buffalo!"  Fennell
			DOLFAN in New England.             
'72 Dolphins - The perfect team in the perfect season - 17-0
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Joe Namath (was Re: 70s Defensive Linemen)
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Date: 6 Nov 92 14:55:09 MST
Distribution: na,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

In article <1992Nov05.175101.6836@eng.umd.edu>, edquist@eng.umd.edu (Karl T. Edquist) writes:
> In article <1992Nov4.184253.519@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
>>satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
>>>In contrast, offensive players
>>>like O.J. Simpson and Joe Namath look pretty good.  
>>
>>A very bad example, Sat.  Namath may look good, but his knees
>>are totally shot.  He lives in pain and can hardly walk.
> 
>I even think Joe was recently fitted with fake (plastic?) knees because his own
>were in such bad shape.

I had heard that Joe's knees were in bad shape already when he was young and
starting for the old AFL Jets.  Was this a concern back when he was drafted,
and how did his knee develop as he aged?  I think it would've been tough
for "Broadway Joe" to be so, ahem, active when his knees were so creaky.
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: BROWNS SUCK HARD!!
From: <RK0VSANU@MIAMIU.BITNET>
Date: Thursday, 5 Nov 1992 23:13:26 EST
Organization: Miami University - Academic Computer Service

I'm a diehard Bengal fan, and damn proud to admit it.  I've got a problem
with all the damn milk-bone throwing Browns fans out there ( and you know
who you are).  30-10.  I got hell from all the Browns fans here in Oxford,
OH, but I stuck it out and we kicked some major ass.  30-10.
 
Let's talk about that goal-line stand and how badly Kevin Mack bites.
Well, simply put, Kevin Mack bites.  That's pretty much all I can say.
I think that the Bengals will turn their season around, starting by beating
the living shit out of the lowly Bears.  My pick is 45-3.
 
Any other Bengal fans out there who share my views?  I could also accept
comments (I guess) from the residents of Mistake On The Lake, USA.
 
--------
Ryan "Boomer" Kearns