HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: wayned.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent,comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Source for FTP available?
Date: 18 Aug 92 22:50:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: cybernet.Va6PPB3w164w
Organization: Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton

kilroy@acme.gen.nz (earthbound misfit, I) writes:

> wayned.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu writes:
> 
> > Actually, I called MWC today about TCP/IP and FTP support.  They told me 
> > that they had just hired somebody to port TCP/IP to Coherent for release 
> > 4.1.  When questioned if they would be including FTP, the response was, 
> > "We have been discussing that in technical meetings lately."  Not a 
> > definite answer one way or the other.  If you are a user, I'd suggest 
> > calling them and plugging FTP.
> 
> Huh? Apologies if I've got this wrong, but aren't the tools necessary for
> FTP just user programs. That is, once Coherent supports TCP/IP (a kernel thin
> that only MWC can do until we get a 386 device driver kit), running FTP over
> it will just be a matter of porting some available code for FTP (that is
> presumably out there).
> 
> 						- k
> -- 
> Craig Harding            kilroy@acme.gen.nz             ACME BBS +64 63 35513
> "Jub'f Xvob?"

Well, you could do a port yourself, if you are ambitious enough.  Why not 
just bug MWC into including it with the upgrade?  That's the approach I'd 
take.  I'm not much into re-inventing wheels.

+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| Wayne Desmond                     | Happily using and working (read:  |
| OS/2 Consultant/Programmer        | earning a GOOD living) with       |
| (wayned.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu) | OS/2, since version 1.1.          |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
From: Jon Freivald <jaf@jaflrn.UUCP>
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: 4.0 on notebook
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 92 18:56:36 EDT
Organization: The Wizzard's Cave, East Meadow, NY

I tried installing 4.0 on a 386sx laptop with LCD VGA monitor.  I did
not enable virtual consoles.  My screen consistently gets garbage all
over it -- blacks out, high & low ascii chars, etc...  Any ideas?

=============================================================================
		   Jon Freivald ( jaflrn!jaf@uunet.UU.NET )
	 Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it.
=============================================================================
From: udo@umunk.GUN.de (Udo Munk)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: Minicom for Coherent 4.0
Date: 14 Aug 92 05:30:39 GMT
Organization: umunk (private)
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

edi@edefix.han.de (E. v. Pappenheim) writes:
: X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
: 
: To compile Minicom 1.30 (I haven't 1.32) under Coherent 4.0 you have to use
: the compiler option -VPSTR because of 'dirty' code, which modifies constant
: strings. In the file updown.c the #ifdef which uses getwd() instead of 
: getcwd() must be deleted, because Coherent has not getwd() anymore, but
: getcwd() instead. Everything else works fine.

Thanks Ecki, I'll try it whith 1.32. Coherent 4.0 has _getwd() for
compatibility.
--
Udo Munk     | voice:      +49 2131 275348             | uucp: +49 2131 278869
Oberstr. 21  | mail :      udo@umunk.GUN.de            |     2400/1200/300 8N1
4040 Neuss 1 | ...!{mcshh,smurf,unido}!easix!umunk!udo | MYNAME=bbsuser
Fed. Rep. of | CompuServe: 100021,2515                 | login: uucp
Germany      | at first connect get ~/info  and ~/files| pwd:   public
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
From: sje@xylos.ma30.bull.com (Steven J. Edwards)
Subject: Coherent 4.0.1 and the 16 Mbyte limit
Reply-To: sje@xylos.ma30.bull.com
Organization: Bull HN, Worldwide Information Systems, Billerica, Mass., USA
Distribution: comp
Date: 13 Aug 92 14:48:12
	<1992Aug13.120524.6779@dlpinc00.rn.com>

In article <1992Aug13.120524.6779@dlpinc00.rn.com> dlparker@dlpinc00.rn.com (David L. Parker) writes:
> Are you sure the 24-bit memory addressing limitation you refer to is not
> a function of the AT-bus 24-bit memory addressing limitation, rather than 
> a limitation of the OS??

The ISA bus is limited to 24 bit addressing.  It was designed to
handle 286 class processors which are limited to 16 Mbytes of physical
memory.  All modern 386+ machines have memory on a local memory bus
that runs at a much faster speed (33 MHz in mine) than the ISA bus
(8.3 MHz, quarter speed).  Therefore, these boxes do not have 24 bit
memory limitations per se.  This is shown by the fact that MS-DOS 5.0
has no problem using memory well past the old ISA limit.  Of course,
the mememory can't sit on the ISA bus.  A problem results if the OS
has to communicate with ISA bus peripheral cards via DMA (Direct
Memory Access); the transfer buffer address must reside in the bottom
16 Mbytes for the DMA controller circuitry to work as it itself is
only aware of 24 bit addressing.  There are other restrictions such as
the 64 Kbyte straddle problem that must also be handled, but these
were treated long ago.  The solution to the DMA problem is to ensure
that the memory transfer buffer be located in ISA bus addressing
space.  This is the responsibility of the OS as user processes have no
say as to where this buffer goes.  MS-DOS 5.0 does this.  Coherent
4.0.1 can't.  Not yet, at least.

The EISA bus does pass all 32 bits of addressing to peripheral cards.
This doesn't help all that much because the EISA bus has the same
speed limitation as the ISA bus.  Also, EISA systems are outnumbered
by about fifty to one by ISA boxes.  I think that EISA is a good thing
for installations with multiple big drives running under heavy loads
as industrial strength file servers.  While MWC may have EISA
solutions in the works, I doubt that there will be many customers in
the short term.  Certainly none of the ISA owners will benefit.  I can
jam 64 Mbyte of ever-less-expensive DRAM SIMMs in my system; why
should I or any of you have to be limited by an old stle drive
controller limitation?  EISA is just a red herring for the vast
majority of the enthusiast and small business communities.

 [The above opinions expressed are my own; not necessarily held by others.]
      == Steven J. Edwards           Bull HN Information Systems Inc. ==
      == (508) 294-3484              300 Concord Road         MS 820A ==
      == sje@xylos.ma30.bull.com     Billerica, MA 01821          USA ==
"That Government which Governs the Least, Governs Best." -- Thomas Jefferson
From: sje@xylos.ma30.bull.com (Steven J. Edwards)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: More fun with /tboot in Coherent 4.0.1
Date: 14 Aug 92 21:34:51 GMT
Reply-To: sje@xylos.ma30.bull.com
Distribution: comp
Organization: Bull HN, Worldwide Information Systems, Billerica, Mass., USA

As reported earlier, I am having trouble booting Coherent 4.0.1 on my
486 system.  An error is reported by tboot to the effect that
"prepare_gift: not enough room for all arguments" followed by "try
again with 'begin' or 'update'" from /etc/brc.build during
installation.

A suggestion by MWC was to abort tboot's automatic sequence (type a
space during the five second pause), and then type "info".  Well, this
definitely produced an interesting repsonse.

Typing "info" once produces a 128 line list of attached drives number
0 though 127.  As there is only one hard drive, I did not put too much
faith in this list.  Typing "info" a second time during the same boot
attempt produced a correct one line response, so I guess it must have
repented of its earlier fibbing.  As further suggested by MWC, I then
typed "autoboot" and tboot proceeded to boot the system with no
complaints whatsoever.  I examined the contents of /dev/boot_gift and
found "autoboot" at offset 0x20.  Earlier troubled boots had apparent
garbage at this location.

I beleive that typing "autoboot" without first typing "info" produces
the same prepare_gift complaint as before.

So, MWC, what's the diagnosis?  Are there any bogus side effects of
not using the manual tboot intervention?  Can we get a new tboot? 

 [The above opinions expressed are my own; not necessarily held by others.]
      == Steven J. Edwards           Bull HN Information Systems Inc. ==
      == (508) 294-3484              300 Concord Road         MS 820A ==
      == sje@xylos.ma30.bull.com     Billerica, MA 01821          USA ==
"That Government which Governs the Least, Governs Best." -- Thomas Jefferson
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
From: pred@iitmax.iit.edu (Predrag S. Bundalo)
Subject: Re: GNU Emacs, porting
Organization: Illinois Institute of Technology
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 92 07:15:52 GMT

In article <9208212037.01@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>GCC may be a requirement for GNU EMACS.  At the least, GNU MAKE will almost
>certainly be a requirement.  It ought to run without demand paging on a 6
>or more magabyte system.

With all of the large programs that are being ported and are going to be
ported to 4.0, wouldn't it be wise to start shipping binary packages?

Maybe someone can test all new software that is submitted in binary form
to raven and put them in the binaries32 directory.

The time and cost to download some of the new stuff (Taylor UUCP, nn, elm)
only to "make" then remove the sources is a rediculous waste.

It was mentioned by someone (Udo Munk?) that you'd need 30 MB just to compile
GCC.  I'd guess that most people don't even have that much space available.

I *might* be able to do this myself, but I think it would be awkward for
someone away from raven to do it.  Does the raven admin use COHERENT v4.0?
Is s/he willing to provide such a service?  If not, let me know.  Maybe
I can set it up so that binaries are sent to me for testing.

Regards,

Pred Bundalo
-- 
:::  Predrag S. Bundalo                  Academic Computing Center
:::  Illinois Institute of Technology    Chicago, Illinois
.....................................................................
:::  Internet:  pred@{iitmax, elof}.iit.edu, syspredrag@minna.iit.edu
:::  BITNET  :  syspredrag@iitvax.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
From: geis@miles.com (Jerry Geis)
Subject: Bug in Coherent 4.0 Compiler
Organization: Miles Inc., Diagnostics Division, Elkhart, IN
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 13:33:50 GMT


-------------------------------------- cut here ------------------------
char *string = "Hello World\n";

main()
{
char **pp;

*pp = string;
printf("%s", *pp);
}
-------------------------------------- and here ------------------------

This program bombs my system and dumps the core. I have tried this 
on other UNIX systems and even dos and it works just fine...

How can this get corrected? Do we have to wait until 4.1????

Jerry GEis   geis@miles.com

-- 

----- The best way to accelarate an IBM or compatible is 9.8 m/s^2 -----

Jerry Geis				Miles, Inc. Elkhart, IN
From: Thomas.Pagel@unnet.w.open.DE (Thomas Pagel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: german keyboard failure
Date: 22 Aug 92 07:15:19 GMT
Reply-To: Thomas.Pagel@unnet.w.open.DE (Thomas Pagel)
Organization: THE UNDERGROUND NETWORK
X-News-Reader: ix/MBox 1.6 PL10f by <volkers@unnet.w.open.DE>

Hallo!

I just got my new Coh. 4.01 and it was relatively easy to install.
But one major problem I have to face:
Loading the german kbd I am not able to use the Cntl-key with any other
key. The result is, that Coherent refuses to work. I have to switch out
my computer to get it back. 

What can I do? 
Who can I find out the key-code for the Cntl-keys on my keyboard?
(a normal at enhanced keyboard...made in taiwan..!??)
Which lines do I have to change in the file /conf/kbd/german.c ?

Any comments and help welcome!

Thanks

Thomas - Germany
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
From: trumpet-user@dkfz-heidelberg.de (Don Ward)
Subject: Re: Coherent Vs Sun OS
Organization: German Cancer Center
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 10:00:16 GMT

In article <1992Aug13.094701.16274@iitmax.iit.edu> pred@iitmax.iit.edu (Predrag S. Bundalo) writes:

>In article <1992Aug11.232401.29059@uswmrg.mrg.uswest.com.mrg.uswest.com> chris@engineer.mrg.uswest.com (Chris Fedde) writes:

>Slower?  If it's smaller--all things considered--it's probably faster.

>Does SunOS 4.x run on PCs?  We could settle this empirically . . .

>Pred Bundalo

>PS I think there are a _few_ more differences than just those mentioned.
>   For instance, I'm pretty sure SunOS is based on BSD 4.3--although I
>   heard something about them planning to switch to SYSVR4--while
>   COHERENT is based on SYSV.
>-- 

I use a sun at work.(SLC sparkstation) It's not very fast. It boots faster
then my coherent at home (386 25Mh). Speed for commands is simaler. I have
never messured the speeds however my impression is that the two machines are
simmaler in speed. Note sun doesn't sell the SLC any more, and the new 
sparkstations are all faster. We have a sunsever here, and it is lots faster.
SunOS 4.1.* doesn't run on a PC, however solars will. It should be out in 
the next year or so.

note: sunos.4.1.2 is a lot easer to manage then coherent, of cource the
vmunix file is 1.6Mb and I have about 200Mb of system and X on the disk.

don ward
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
if you want me to be able to read you post, then you have to set the
distrubution to world. I am in Germany. Thats why I have trouble with
my spelling. please excuse.
Don Ward at: zdv620@support.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de
From: jph2u@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (John Hannon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Multi OS boot problem
Date: 22 Aug 92 11:45:27 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia
Originator: jph2u@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU

I have installed Coherent 4.0 on a 486/33 that also runs OS/2 and DOS
5.0.  I installed Coherent as directed, making the Coherent partition
active, so that on power up it boots Coherent unless I specify the
OS/2 boot manager partition.  Everything worked fine for about two
weeks, but now Coherent won't boot.  If I power up and don't specify
another partition, I get a message that says Coherent partition 2, the
a drive light comes on, and the machine freezes.  If I reset and
specify the boot manager partition, it works fine and I can boot either 
OS/2 or DOS from that menu.  I would appreciate hearing from anyone
who may have encountered this, or from MWC if they have any idea.  If
all else fails I will try to reinstall Coherent, but I would prefer
not to have to take that step.
Thanks.
-- 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
John Hannon, Department of Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics
University of Virginia | | Internet: hannon@virginia.edu
Any opinions expressed are mine, and I take full responsibility for them.
From: mauritz_c@spcvxb.spc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Installing Elm (a problem) on Coh 4.0
Date: 21 Aug 92 18:59:20 GMT
Organization: SPC Community Access System

I just tried to install the version of Elm posted in the incoming32
directory at Raven.  (Actually, I tried to install it on a Sun 3
first as a test using SunOS 4.1.1..but I digress <grin>)

There seems to be a file missing and the "sh Configure" command
give me the following error (and then exits):

First let's make sure your kit is complete.  Checking...
awk: can't open config.h.SH
 record number 4785

Any ideas?  Since Comb no longer works, I have to get some sort of
mailer up and running.... :-)

Cheers,

Chris
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: Problems w/ multi-volume tar backup
From: kilroy@acme.gen.nz (earthbound misfit, I)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 92 00:19:47 GMT
Organization: ACME BBS - Public Access Usenet, Palmerston North, New Zealand

grante@aquarius.rosemount.com (Grant Edwards) writes:

> [...problems with ustar and GNU tar...]
>
> Has anybody else seen these problems?

No.

>                                        I _really_ hate dump/restore,
> so if there's a way to do multi-volume tar backups I'd like to hear
> about it.

I've been using cpio (which appears to be preferred at MWC as well), and it
works okay although it doesn't restore links properly. However, ustar is just
cpio with a different UI so if you're having problems with one it's likely
you'll have problems with the other. I'm using 1.2M floppies here, that could
be the difference.

						- k
-- 
Craig Harding            kilroy@acme.gen.nz             ACME BBS +64 63 3551342
"Jub'f Xvob?"
From: deutschm@lucky.lion.de (Carsten Deutschmann)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: direct uucp-connexion?
Date: 21 Aug 92 14:55:47 GMT
Reply-To: "Coherent operating system" <COHERENT@indycms.bitnet>

Hi folks,

all I wanna ask is:

Is there a way do have 2 systems connected by uucp without
any modem? I mean somesthing like Nullmodemcable.
(Is 2times female serial cable called Nullmodem in English?)

So go on, and tell me!

Ciao Carsten...
From: mike@pacsoft.com (Mike Stefanik)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: Passwords and security (Was: Who are you?)
Date: 17 Aug 92 09:57:17 GMT
Organization: Pacific Software Group, Riverside, Ca.

In an article, david@r-node.gts.org (Gerald Abshez) writes:
>As a general rule, this is not true. The purpose of a good encryption method
>is to keep something secret. Even a "well known" method should take a good
>amount of time to crack. The choice of password, along with how often it
>is changed, is very important. [...]

The hows and wherefores of cracking UNIX passwords are well known.  Choosing
good passwords, is of course, the best solution.  But if one user is lazy,
that's all that a cracker might need to have his way with your box.  Security
should not depend solely on the savvy of your users.
-- 
Mike Stefanik  mike@pacsoft.com  ...!uunet!pacsoft!mike  (+1 714 681 2623)
Pacific Software Group, Riverside, CA
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
From: hcp@csx.cciw.ca (H.C. Pulley)
Subject: Re: Dial-in problems
Organization: Canada Centre for Inland Waters
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 03:22:19 GMT

In article <goose.714356298@ais.org> goose@ais.org (Christopher L. Goosman) writes:
>hcp@csx.cciw.ca (H.C. Pulley) writes:
>
>>In article <goose.713815272@ais.org> goose@ais.org (Christopher L. Goosman) writes:
>>>I can dial out just fine from my Coherent box (A Dell 200 running 3.2) but
>>>dialing in is another problem entirely. As soon as I get a CD the TR
>>>drops on my modem and the modem hangs up. I've set the modem according to
>>>the file modeminit (AT E0 V0 Q1 S0=1) so I don't think it's a modem problem,
>
>>Does your modem have a command '&D0'?  If it does, add &D0 to your modeminit.
>
>Well, things are better, but not good. Switching to com2r solved the
>hanging-up problem (don't ask me why). But now all I get from the Coherent
>box is garbage when I type anything, no prompt at connect, just junk. I'm
>calling in from a Shiva Net Modem-E to a Cardinal 2400 (no MNP), at N-8-1,
>but I've also tried from a Cardinal to a Cardinal to no avail. This one is
>just baffling me. Granted, I'm no guru, but it seems to me this should have
>an easy soloution, one that will make me slap myself when I'm all done.

Take a look at your /etc/ttys file.  Is the baud rate set correctly?  Garbage
oftens means wrong baud rates.  I have mine hard set for 2400 baud (no auto
detect).

Also, you might want to remove the 'Q1' from your modeminit.  I think (not sure
-there was alot of voodoo in setting up the dial-in stuff for my modem) that Q1
(don't return response codes) caused me to have problems (including garbage at
the receiving end).  My modeminit is (AT &D0 E0 V0 &C1 S0=1).

>Thanks for the help so far.

You're welcome!

Harry
-- 
         hcp@csx.cciw.ca           | This message    | It takes all kinds,
   hcpiv@grumpy.cis.uoguelph.ca    | released to the | and to each his own.
-----------------------------------| PUBLIC DOMAIN.  | This thought in mind,
 Stay away from the DOS side Luke! |                 | I walk alone.
From: PINEAU@uqac.uquebec.ca (Louis Pineau)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re:      Installation of 4.0 - missing disk  2 !
Date: 19 Aug 92 01:20:59 GMT
Reply-To: "Coherent operating system" <COHERENT@indycms.bitnet>
Organization: Universite du Quebec a Chicoutimi

In article,  David E Filip (colornet!dfilip@PRESTO.IG.COM) wrote:
>>
>>Today, after waiting months, I installed my recently received copy of Coherent
>>4.0. I sat down at my PC, booted the boot floppy, and easily answered all the
>>questions, and installed a minimal Coherent on my hard disk. System
>>re-booted, and asked me to insert one of the remaining disks. I inserted the
>>disk labeled 'Disk 2', and the system told me that I had already inserted
>>disk 1. It took the remainder of the disks, but would not take disk 2, and
>>kept complaining it was disk 1. I called MWC, and they informed me that some
>>of the kits were shipped with two disk 1's, and that they would need to ship
>>me another disk 2.
>>
>>Was wondering how many others have experienced this same joy ???
>>
>>Argh ! So close, yet so far ...
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Dave.
>>
>>--
>>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>=   David E. Filip                UUCP   : uupsi!jpradley!colornet!dfilip   =
>>=   ColorNet Information Systems  CIS    : 76430,3111                       =
>>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>=     'Why fix the application when we can just keep fixing the data ?'     =
>>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>

I just received my kit today and indeed, I, also, received 2 disks number one.

'Gonna have to call MWC to have my floppy...

bye.



================================================================================
Louis-Marius Pineau                | E-mail:
System analyst/manager             |        internet: pineau@uqac.uquebec.ca
Universite du Quebec a Chicoutimi  |        bitnet:   pineau@uquebec
Canada                             |
================================================================================
Xref: sparky comp.os.coherent:3639 comp.os.os2.misc:27292
From: tpa10@ccc.amdahl.com (Thomas P. Anderson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 files to Coherent using HPFS?
Date: 13 Aug 92 16:13:40 GMT
Reply-To: tpa10@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Thomas P. Anderson)
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1992Aug13.113237.12689@phillip.edu.au> t9114145@phillip.edu.au writes:
>Is anyone using Coherent on the same HD as OS/2 2.0? I am wondering if
>I will still be able to transfer files to and from the two partitions
>if I choose OS/2's HPFS as opposed to the DOS FAT file system. Coherent
>supplies utilities for reading/writing etc. to a dos partition, will these
>still work (will OS/2 intercept and translate?) or will new utilities
>be required? If the latter, where can they be found?
> 
>I will stick with the FAT if the answer to both of the above questions is
>no, as transfer between the partitions will be very important.
>
>-- 
>
>Adam Eberbach    Computer Science student, RMIT.   t9114145@phillip.edu.au
>               "We don' need no stinkin' signatures!"

I sure wouldn't count on it!  I just installed OS/2 2.0, DOS 5.0, and
Coherent 3.2 (still waiting for my upgrade to arrive -HINT HINT-) on a
200+ meg hard drive.  I avoided the HPFS like the plague, as the OS/2
doc indicates that you will not be able to do file sharing with your DOS
partition and, I beleive, you CANNOT put OS/2 on an extended DOS
partition if you use HPFS.  If DOS-OS/2 aren't going to share, I doubt
very much that Coherent will pick up the slack.  With the FAT system
you have the best chance of sharing between all three systems
   EXCEPT THAT Coh 3.2 CAN'T DEAL WITH DOS 5.0'sFILE SYSTEM!!
            (that's another hint for MWC).
From: sjsobol@tiny.com ("Steven J. Sobol")
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: decwrl.dec.com
Date: 21 Aug 92 05:14:25 GMT
Reply-To: "Coherent operating system" <COHERENT@indycms.bitnet>

In article <01GNSGP69ZPS9KM9FW@delphi.com> you write:

>You picked a good time to ask since, since I've been going through the
>same thing in the last two days and just picked up all of the information,
>and even managed to get a few files so far.

Terrific. Thanks. I will try to avoid ftpmail since it uses a lot of
bandwidth (I'll talk friends into FTP'ing for me, or maybe I'll buy
CohWare 3) but it's good to have the info. Can ftpmail connect to any
FTP site?

*--TechnoGeek--*