HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jjsmith@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jonathan J. Smith)
Subject: Re: AT&T vs. BSDI --> 4.3BSD-NET2 distribution requires AT&T license!!!
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Keywords: AT&T 'Death Star' rises over BSDI's horizon [Tel. 1-800-800-4BSD
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 92 14:26:31 GMT


Hrm well to the uneducated in legalieze (me) this sounds just a tad unlikely,
First of I believe that AT&T has to PROVE that said things actually were
based on derived from intellectual property of AT&T.  I also believe that
burden of proof lies with AT&T.  To me it sounds a shade unlikely that they
could possibly prove that , I COULD be totaly wrong here however.  Just doubting
that is will happen i guess, sounds way to unreasonable.

Besides its not the END of ALL unlicensed *nix stuff, Look at the GNU project, or MACH stuff.. unless AT&T is going to claim those fall under its intellectual
property also!.

Jonathan Smith
From: ken@sugra.uucp (Kenneth Ng)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: AT&T sues BSDI
Date: 25 Jul 92 22:15:53 GMT
Organization: Private Computer, Totowa NJ

In article <QUANSTRO.92Jul21140234@lars.StOlaf.edu:, quanstro@lars.StOlaf.edu (goon) writes:
:    Imminent death of free-UN*X systems predicted...
: Wouldn't that be great!
: Imagine being creative and trying to sythesize all that's been learned
: from Unix (R) in the last twenty years and actually trying to break
: out of the YAU (yet another Uni*) mold. . .

While I would love to see something substantially different than UNIX(R)
being introduced, I still think USL could doom any such OS with their
"intellectual property" b.s.  Apparently, in their eyes, anyone who has
*EVER* worked on a UNIX(R) machine in any way is "contaminated" and therefore
guilty of stealing ideas that only AT&T could have possiblity thought of
because they are the only people in the world that can think (warning:
extreme sarcism mode set).  Yes, USL is becoming the new Apple or the
McCarthy of the 90's.  "Have you ever used or do you know of anyone who
has used a UNIX(R) system?  GUILTY!"

Remember: the concept of TRUE and FALSE are propriety USL concepts.

-- 
Kenneth Ng
Please reply to kdn5669@hertz.njit.edu for now.
"No problem, here's how you build it" -- R. Barclay, ST: TNG
From: hudgens@SCRI.FSU.EDU (Jim Hudgens)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: extract etc01 problem?
Date: 25 Jul 92 22:16:44 GMT
Organization: SCRI, Florida State University


I'm using the  patched wd dist.fs kernel, so this may be part of the
problem...

I successfully installed the bin01 set, and then tried to install the 
etc01 set.  It ran for 10-20 minutes, and then a stream of errors 
something like (from memory):

extract:  etc01.xx : open:  too many open files

and I know that xx went at least as far back as 71.  Anyone know 
what the problem is here?

I did successfully get src01 to install.

Thanks for any help,
JHH
--
Jim Hudgens 			Supercomputer Computations Research Institute
hudgens@sun13.scri.fsu.edu
From: 9531mide@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Curt A. Mideiros)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Installing 386BSD-0.1 ? (Q)
Keywords: 386BSD install
Date: 22 Jul 92 16:36:38 GMT
Distribution: comp

I obtained the two files, "rawrite.exe" and "dist.fs" from    
agate.berkeley.edu (via ftp-binary xfer).  I then ran rawrite to 
transfer a bootable image to a 1.44MB formatted floppy disk.  The
problem is, that it doesn't seem to boot.  I'm using a PS/2 Model 70
w/ 8M ram and 120MB HD, with an 8514 adapter. Is there a hardware
compatiblity problem with PS/2's ??   I was also just curious: 
a "Tiny BSD" disk is avail from DDJ via mail.  Is the complete set 
on floppies available also (for the those with out internet access) ??
Any info would be appreciated.

Curt A. Mideiros
University of California @ Santa Barbara
Computer Center - 2316 Girvetz Hall
Santa Barbara, CA 93106
   Phone: (805) 893-8601
  Bitnet: 9531mide@ucsbvm.bitnet
Internet: 9531mide@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu
From: tmh@doppel.first.gmd.de (Thomas Hoberg)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: PBOOT.ZIP (choose an OS to boot on startup)
Date: 29 Jul 92 01:36:20 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: GMD-FIRST, Berlin

Sorry to you folks who tried to download PBOOT.ZIP from /pub/incoming
at agate.berkeley.edu. I didn't notice that the directory was read
protected... I tried posting it yesterday, but it turned out to be too
big (the error message said something else so I didn't try to split it
then). 

To recap: PBOOT.ZIP contains a replacement for the master boot block
(which in turn contains the partition table). Instead of just booting
the "active" partition it displays a menu and lets the user choose an
OS to boot. It doesn't actually care which OS is marked active, but
beware that some OSs do either only work from the active parititon
(e.g. ISC) or will happily trash whichever paritition is marked
active, assuming that that's the one they booted from (dual boot
option of OS/2 2.0). PBOOT.ZIP comes with a small DOS based
installation program and the complete source. Another version of the
boot block lets you patch disk geometry parameters on boot for older
computers that don't have configurable entries in CMOS (but doesn't
offer OS selection--there is very little space in the MBR).

PBOOT.ZIP can be downloaded from agate.berkeley.edu (either from
incoming or elsewhere). I'll try posting it now, too.

Enjoy, Tom
---
Thomas M. Hoberg   | Internet: tmh@first.gmd.de
1000 Berlin 41     |           tmh@cs.tu-berlin.de
Wielandstr. 4      |
Germany            | BITNET:   tmh@tub.bitnet 
+49-30-851-50-21   |
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: swolfson@nyx.cs.du.edu (Sabina Wolfson)
Subject: Re: AT&T sues BSDI
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 23:46:25 GMT


>In article <1992Jul21.131433.16450@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg>,
>eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Othman Ahmad) writes:
>
>The person/organization AT&T might sue in the future over NET/2.
>
>
>I like the idea of sending letters of complaint to AT&T explaining
>why you have requested changing your long-distance carrier.  Seems like
>fair play in light of AT&T's tactics.

Contacting AT&T and USL and anyone else you can think of to complain is a
great idea (doing this at the same time you change your long distance
service of course).  Here are some phone and fax numbers that might help.

AT&T General
	Phone: 908-582-3000
AT&T President - Mr. Mayo
	Phone: 908-582-7610
	Fax:   908-582-5390

USL General 
	Phone: 908-522-6555
USL President - Mr. Pieper
	Phone: 908-522-6516
	Fax:   908-522-5171
USL Executive Vice President - Mr. Tannebaum
	Phone: 908-522-6666
	Fax:   908-522-5171
USL Chief Financial Officer - Steve Baker
	Phone: 908-522-7374
	Fax:   908-522-5038

The Chaiperson of the Board would also be a good person to contact, but
USL hasn't gotten back to me with that info yet.

Someone also asked about the Judge, and it says in the court docs: United
States District Court, District of New Jersey, Hon. Dickinson R.
Debevoise.


>In article <vera.712128506@fanaraaken.Stanford.EDU>,
>vera@fanaraaken.Stanford.EDU (James S. Vera) writes:

>>In article <scs.712004511@wotan.iti.org> scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons) writes:

>>I was under the impression that AT&T sold most if not all of its interest
>>in USL.

>Quoting from the complaint:
>  USL is a subsidiary of American Telephone and Telegraph ("AT&T") ...

I called up USL's Investor Relations and they said that %60-%70 of USL's
stock belongs to AT&T, but it is hard to get more info than that since USL
is private.  FYI USL's Investor Relations phone number is 908-522-6264 and
the person to talk it is Ry Schwark.


Sabina

sabina@cns.nyu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: cproto@marsh.cs.curtin.edu.au (Computer Protocol)
Subject: 386bsd-0.1
Summary: 386bsd-0.1 a step backward ?
Keywords: 386bsd
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 11:12:34 GMT

Hi there,

after running 386bsd-0.0 since march, 0.1 has not much to offer. Here
is a list of problems, the first is really a showstopper:

1 - large makes hang the system sometimes (try making the kernel a few
times) (the patched 0.0 worked fairly reliable, it started trashing and later
hung when I compiled X11R5)

2 - if fsck fails at the second partition, init continues rather then 
reboot

3 - the com driver looses characters (0.0 hasn't)

4 - ddb is not documented

5 - pccons.c driver delays entered characters until the next char is
typed (sometimes) (0.0 hasn't)

6 - cp is stupid in single user mode ???? (0.0 wasn't)

7 - kern_execve.c doesn't recognize #!/bin/sh (patched 0.0 did)

8 - mtools don't work

9 - kermit is broken in multiple ways


I think I combine the best out of both worlds and run a mix of 0.0 and
0.1.

Regards - Tibor Sashegyi (cproto@abel.cs.curtin.edu.au)
From: tmh@keks.first.gmd.de (Thomas Hoberg)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: partition booter uploaded to agate (select OS to boot on startup)
Date: 27 Jul 92 19:05:53 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: GMD-FIRST, Berlin

Hi folks!

For those of you who want to select which OS to boot on system
startup, I have uploaded a repleacement for the master boot block that
allows you to choose from a menu on boot. It comes complete with
source and a small installation program. It works on all PCs and OSs
that I have encountered. I have put it on agate.berkeleay.edu into the
/pub/incoming directory. I don't know whom I should inform about it
and hope that it will move eventually wherever it belongs.

If you have any problems with it, contact me.
If you don't have FTP access, I could mail it to you. If you think it
should be posted, I will (it's not *that* big).
---
Thomas M. Hoberg   | Internet: tmh@first.gmd.de
1000 Berlin 41     |           tmh@cs.tu-berlin.de
Wielandstr. 4      |
Germany            | BITNET:   tmh@tub.bitnet 
+49-30-851-50-21   |

From: laurentj@hpgnd195.grenoble.hp.com (Laurent_Julliard)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1992 08:33:22 GMT
Subject: Re: 386BSD: Ingres, Postgres --- Database
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, GND
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd

Hello !


   Did you try the simple (yet efficient !) relational database system called
   REQUIEM ?

   You can retrieve the sources from nic.funet.fi (128.214.6.100) at the
   following location :/pub/unix/databases/tmp/REQUIEM/.

   Enjoy and let me know if you can compile it on BSD. I'm in the process
   of doing this on Linux with some troubles but nothing very bad. I can
   assure you that I have compiled this RDBMS straightforward on many other
   UNIX system without any trouble.

   Laurent JULLIARD
   laurentj@hpgnse2.grenoble.hp.com

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Othman Ahmad)
Subject: Re: 386BSD: Anyone using gcc-2.x on 0.1?
Organization: Nanyang Technological University - Singapore
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 06:41:20 GMT

In article <1992Jul29.155631.21213@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov> kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley) writes:

: While working my way around the system, I discovered that the version
: of gcc shipped in 0.1 is 1.39, at least as reported by 'gcc -v'.
: 
: I'm highly interested in moving to the latest version of gcc-2.x,
: (currently 2.2.2) because:
: 
: a) I'd like to take advantage of it's ability to emit 486 specific
:    code (instruction scheduling, primarily)
: 
: b) Its ability to emit PIC (Position Independent Code) seems to be
:    a pre-requisite for shared libraries.
: 
: Has anyone else "bootstrapped" up to 2.2.2 yet?  Has anyone who
I did for 0.0 and it is very easy. Just use stddef.h from 386BSD instead of
gstddef.h. Also use tm.h from 0.0 gcc 1.39 but with some modifications.

: has, rebuilt the kernel with it yet?  Does anyone have any reasons
I tried but there are some bugs with my version of gcc 2.2.2. I must have done
something wrong because my parser was version 2.1 but it managed to generate
executable code because the code-generation parts are from 2.2.2.

: why this might not be a good idea?
gcc 2.2.2 I suspect is not 100% compatible with gcc-1XX.
: 
: I'll be trying it anyway -- I've got nothing to loose, the worst thing
: that could happen is I'd have to reload a few disks :-)
It is easy but needs more work. I have no longer keen because I discovered
bugs in gcc-2.2.2 when porting it to Dec ultrix with the new libraries.
The latest version of gcc is not as stable as gcc-1.40.
	However you can get 30% speedup but no code size difference for a
386 machine.

Good luck.

--
Othman bin Ahmad, School of EEE,
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 2263.
Internet Email: eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg
Bitnet Email: eoahmad@ntuvax.bitnet

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: danson@lgc.com (Doug Anson)
Subject: Status of X386 on 386BSD?
Keywords: 386BSD X386
Organization: LandMark Graphics Corporation LGC
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 14:31:53 GMT

Hello,

Does anyone know what the current status of X386 (1.2E) is on the
386bsd platform? I had heard that the port was complete for 0.0
and was wondering about 0.1.

Thanks,

Doug

-- 
-------------------------------------------
Doug Anson					
Internet: danson@lgc.com			
Phone:	  713-579-4739
SNAIL:    Landmark Graphics Corporation LGC	
	  333 Cypress Run			
	  Houston, TX 77094			
-------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: explorer@iastate.edu (Michael Graff)
Subject: Re: second drive on 0.1
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 15:41:18 GMT

In <APPEL.92Jul21002145@soda.xcf.Berkeley.EDU> appel@xcf.Berkeley.EDU (Shannon D. Appel) writes:

>Could someone make a kernel configured for two drives available on one of
>the FTP sites?  I don't have the room for the source code to generate a
>kernel to allow me to use a second drive until I get a second drive up.
>A bit of a dilemma...

I second this, and I'm sure Michael V will third it.  While I might have
the space for the kernel source, I don't have room to compile it.  :(

--Michael
-- 
--
Michael Graff    Iowa State University Computation Center      Project Vincent
215 Durham                voice: (515) 294-4994           explorer@iastate.edu
Ames, IA  50010           fax:   (515) 294-1717           gg.mlg@isumvs.bitnet
-- 
--
Michael Graff    Iowa State University Computation Center      Project Vincent
215 Durham                voice: (515) 294-4994           explorer@iastate.edu
Ames, IA  50010           fax:   (515) 294-1717           gg.mlg@isumvs.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: pred@iitmax.iit.edu (Predrag S. Bundalo)
Subject: Tiny 386BSD installation problems.
Organization: Illinois Institute of Technology / Academic Computing Center
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 18:59:32 GMT

I just got a copy of Tiny 386BSD and was "install"ing it onto my hard disk.
Everything went fine until it tried to reboot off the hard disk.

It would go into a continuous crash/reboot sequence spitting out the following
on the console:

>vm_fault(fe071c9c, 0, 1, 0) -> 1
>
>type, c code fe060000
>
>trap type 12 code = fe060000 eip = fe01276a cs = 8 eflags = 10282 cr2 4 cpl 1a
>panic: trap
>
>The operating system is saving a copy of RAM memory to device 1, offset 0
>(hit any key to abort): [amount left to save (MB)] --device bad
>system rebooting

My system type: 8MB memory, 100MB IDE drive, VGA, 33MHz BELTRON 386.

I assume there's something about the IDE drive it doesn't like.  Anyone
understand how I can remedy this problem?  I'm trying to get this system
set up for IIT as a demo for students.

Thanks,

--Pred
-- 
:::  Predrag S. Bundalo                  Academic Computing Center     :::
:::  Illinois Institute of Technology    Chicago, Illinois             :::
..........................................................................
:::  Internet:  pred@{iitmax, elof}.iit.edu, syspredrag@minna.iit.edu  :::
:::  BITNET  :  syspredrag@iitvax.BITNET                               :::
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: veit@du9ds3.uni-duisburg.de (Holger Veit)
Subject: Re: 386BSD 0.1 & Com ports
Date: 22 Jul 92 12:28:42 GMT
Reply-To: veit@du9ds3.uni-duisburg.de
Organization: Uni-Duisburg FB9 Datenverarbeitung
Keywords: com tip ttys remote

In <sxjcb.37.711773132@skyfire.uacn.alaska.edu> sxjcb@skyfire.uacn.alaska.edu (Jay C. Beavers) writes:

>I've been trying to use tip to talk to both a line driver or a modem on com2 
>and I've had no end of trouble.  My hardware setup worked under Dos and 
>worked using the TinyBSD boot disk and basic distribution on the hard drive, 
>but once I loaded BIN01, trouble started.

># tip com2
>lock open: No such file or directory
>all ports busy

>/etc/remote contains:
>com2:dv=/dev/com2:br#9600:

>/etc/ttys contains:
>#com02	"/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"	unknown	off	secure
>com02	none				unknown	off	secure

>(I've tried this with the first line uncommented and with a status of on)

>ls -la /var/spool/lock/* contains nothing
>cat /var/log/aculog shows blank
>/dev/com2 has rw for root which I've tried this under.

>I've read as much as I can find in Managing UUCP & Usenet by ORA which has 
>fairly extensive coverage of com ports under 4.3BSD and nothing there has 
>helped.  I've even created /usr/spool/locks just on the off chance that that 
>would help.  I could find no acucntrl or uugetty on the distribution.

>So, what am I missing, and can anyone help?

> - jcb
>______________________________________________________________________________
>                                      |
>Jay C. Beavers                        |   sxjcb@orca.alaska.edu 
>University of Alaska Computer Network |   sxjcb@alaska.bitnet
>______________________________________|_______________________________________

Did you change com02 to com2 in /etc/ttys? Just an idea, at least one that
worked for me when connecting a terminal to com2 first failed.

Holger

-- 
|  |   / Holger Veit             | INTERNET: veit@du9ds3.uni-duisburg.de
|__|  /  University of Duisburg  | BITNET: veit%du9ds3.uni-duisburg.de@UNIDO
|  | /   Dept. of Electr. Eng.   | "No, my programs are not BUGGY, these are
|  |/    Inst. f. Dataprocessing |          just unexpected FEATURES"
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: julian@tfs.com (Julian Elischer)
Subject: Re: Setting up bootable DOS pertition by hand
Keywords: DOS
Organization: TRW Financial Systems
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 16:42:24 GMT

In article <1992Jul30.130213.11601@odin.diku.dk> storner@diku.dk (Henrik St|rner) writes:
>
>6) Use a DOS-based boot-partition switcher to replace the Master Boot
>   record so You can select which partition to boot from as part of the
>   booting proces. Several of these are avaiable at ftp archives such as
>   wuarchive.wustl.edu / oak.oakland.edu / wsmr-simtel20-army.mil . If
>   You cannot find one, I can e-mail or post one.


I looked on oak.oakland.edu, but I didn't know what I was looking for.
Can you (or someone else) give more explicit directions for picking
up a multi-partition booter?


+----------------------------------+       ______ _  __
|   __--_|\  Julian Elischer       |       \     U \/ / On assignment
|  /       \ julian@tfs.com        +------>x   USA    \ in a very strange
| (   OZ    ) 2118 Milvia st. Berkeley CA. \___   ___ | country !
+- X_.---._/  USA+(510) 704-3137(wk)           \_/   \\            
          v


Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: jas5@cec1.wustl.edu (John Adam Szofran)
Subject: Re: 40MB IDE goes rumble beep beep on 386bsd install
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis Mo.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 17:06:20 GMT

After some experimentation, it turns out that 386bsd has problems with my
hard disk only after cylinder 784 (assuming the first one is #1).  My hard
disk has the following characteristics:

Western Digital 40MB IDE, model# WD95044-A
977 cylinders
5 heads
17 sectors/track

Thanks to Eric Haug for the advice to narrow down this problem.
Suggestions from anyone else are welcome via email: zof@wubcl.wustl.edu

Thank you.
--
J. Adam Szofran                    Internet: zof@wubcl.wustl.edu
Electrical Engineering Student        Phone: (314) 362-2135
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: alm@netcom.com (Andrew Moore)
Subject: Floppy woes (was Re: Beginner's problems with 386BSD)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 09:54:12 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

>Due to a couple of niggling things, it will not work.  Remove the
>/dev/rfd0a and /dev/fd0a devices, then MAKEDEV fd0.  As it turns
>out, mtools wants /dev/rfd0c, not the "a" partition on the floppy
>drives.  Alturnatively, you can re-compile mtools to use
>/dev/rfd0a instead of /dev/rfd0c (I found that creating the correct
>devices was more expediante.)

    Another problem is the floppy gets "stuck" after 386bsd boots.  Any
    mtools operation seems not to work and to be uninterruptable.   I
    thought I had solved this problem by moving my video card from a 16
    bit isa slot to an 8 bit one.  This allowed me to install 386bsd on
    the hard disk.  But now that it's installed, the floppy is acting
    up again!  There might still be a memory conflict (though in
    principle there shouldn't be), but maybe there is a work around
    too?

    The video card is a OEM Paradise SVGA.  I don't see any mention of
    interrupts (someone had IRQ 2 problems).  The floppies are run off
    an Adaptec 1542B SCSI controller.  
    -Andrew Moore <alm@netcom.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: rjc@nynexst.com (Robert Casazza)
Subject: 386BSD on ALR??
Organization: NYNEX Science & Technology, Inc.
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 12:29:35 GMT

I'm having trouble booting the "tiny" distribution diskette.
I've tried the debugging version with no success.  I get
no messages, the system just hangs and I have to power down.
I've tried cold booting with no success.

Configuration:

ALR BusinessVEISA 386/33, 8Mb, 200M IDE Conner, Paradise SVGA,
shadow bios disabled.

Does anybody have 386BSD running on an ALR??

Thanks,
Bob
-- 
Robert Casazza                                rjc@nynexst.com
NYNEX Science & Technology Center
White Plains, NY 10604
From: richard@asis.unimelb.EDU.AU (Richard Begg)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Slow ne2000 response
Date: 28 Jul 92 02:35:34 GMT

I guess I can join the list of people who have got bsd386-0.1 working.
The only problem I have other than 4MB of ram isn't enough
is the ne2000 compat. ethernet card.

I remember others compaining of slow response possibly due to conflicts
with the VGA card.  Well could anyone out there who has had this problem
fill me in on what they did to fix it.  I have tried changing interrupts
but it is still pretty slow (~5-8 K/s).  What interrupts and i/o address
are you all using?  

Thanks,
Richard.
Richard Begg (richard@asis.unimelb.edu.au)
Admin Systems and Info Services - University of Melbourne.
From: sxjcb@orca.alaska.edu (Jay C. Beavers)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: /etc/slip.login
Date: 27 Jul 92 23:36:16 GMT
Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd
Organization: University of Alaska Computer Network

Could someone post an example of /etc/slip.login and perhaps any other
files
that may be important for using slip and not really documented anywhere.

Thanks

______________________________________________________________________________
                                        |    jay@seaspray.uacn.alaska.edu
Jay C. Beavers                          |    sxjcb@orca.alaska.edu
University of Alaska Computer Network   |    sxjcb@alaska.bitnet
________________________________________|_____________________________________
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd