HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kilroy@acme.gen.nz (earthbound misfit, I)
Subject: Re: Creating alt.united.we.stand.america
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 92 12:38:20 GMT
Organization: ACME BBS - Public Access Usenet, Palmerston North, New Zealand

lancer@rajeesh.WPI.EDU (Stephe Lewis Foskett) writes:

> >>>>> "arromdee" == Ken Arromdee <arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu> writes:
> arromdee> Dots in a newsgroup name are not generally considered
> arromdee> appropriate to separate words.
> 
> True.  alt.politics.united-we-stand-america would be my vote.  I'd
> like to see some serious discussion of Perot's ideas.  I don't think
> he'd make a great president, but I would certainly vote in favor of a
> newsgroup for his supporters to discuss their plans...

United we stand where?

How about alt.politics.us.whatever? Or even us.politics......?

						- k
-- 
Craig Harding            kilroy@acme.gen.nz             ACME BBS +64 6 3551342
"Jub'er lbh pnyyvat n obmb?"
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: kherron@ms.uky.edu (Kenneth Herron)
Subject: Re: CFD: alt.stores
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:07:38 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

Richard.Banks@launchpad.unc.edu (Richard Banks) writes:

>I think a good idea is to create a group to discuss dairy, gorcery,
>toy, etc stores.  

Misc.consumers.

>Or how about to discuss shopping malls, management,
>design and construction, etc?

Are there any shopping mall managers, designers, or contractors
on the net?  It's going to be a pretty dull group otherwise.  Besides
which, there's already an alt.architecture.
-- 
Kenneth Herron                                              kherron@ms.uky.edu
University of Kentucky                                         +1 606 257 2975
Dept. of Mathematics     "Your ball goes over them, it sails off the edge into
a huge cauldren of fire-breathing dragons."  "And they call this a par three?"
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: new alt.politics.* groups
Organization: Homosexual Fascist Lobby, Rampant Paranoia Division
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 13:49:35 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.120548.2027@nntp.hut.fi> jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala) writes:

>so it seems there's demand for the groups and because of this I though
>I could skip the discussion phase of creating them as alt groups.

Well, you were wrong.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu / I use antlers in all of my decorating.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: CFD:  Creating an alt.* Newsgroup For Personality Typing Systems
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 12:13:29 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

noring@netcom.com (Jon Noring) writes:
> Yet, I've tried many times to start discussion on sci.psychology concerning
> Myers-Briggs, with very limited response and essentially no interest, while
> I've found very substantial interest in other newsgroups such as, believe it
> or not, alt.sex, alt.personals, and alt.business.multi-level!  Apparently,
> people who are interested in M-B and similar systems are spread throughout
> Usenet, and by and large come from the general Usenet population (i.e, are no
> restricted to trained psychologists), so one can see why I've received a lot
> of response in the past from alt.sex because of its huge readership.

Quite.  I'm interested in these tests, from a sceptical point of view, but I
don't read sci.psychology.


mathew
[ INFP ]

Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.d
From: zzekka@unislc.uucp (Zeke Zecca)
Subject: Re: Newgroup: ALT.BINARIES.PICTURES.NUDE
Reply-To: zzekka@unislc.UUCP (Zeke Zecca,B2C10,4827)
Organization: Unisys, Salt Lake City
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 00:06:14 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.104539.22899@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> hykok@nyx.cs.du.edu (Herbie Husker) writes:
>taz@momad.UUCP (Jon N.) writes:
>
>
>>HERE IS A PROPOSAL:
>
>
>>	In light of the recent postings of questionable pictures of nudity, I 
>>        propose a new news.group, "ALT.BINARIES.PICTURES.NUDE"  
>
>>	This newsgroup will be for posting of pictures of the human body, but 
>>        not necessarily in a sexual manner.  This should not become a place
>>	for posting nude children, but for nude PEOPLE, adult or children.
>
>>	ALT.BINARIES.PICTURES.EROTICA can remain as a forum for sexually 
>>	explicit pictures, whereas clean nudity, without direct sexual
>>	connotation, will be posted in ALT.BINARIES.PICTURES.NUDE.
>
>
>>	Please send your votes on this subject publicly, please reply
>>	to this message.   Thank you.
>

Sure, why not? We subcatagorize every thing in life. Why not this too?

Also we need to pay a little attention to wording:
"...explicit pictures, whereas clean nudity, without direct sexual..."
										 ^^^^^
Liet's not use these subjective, emotionally charged words please.
Zekers!

Newsgroups: alt.config
From: ctrexp2@caa.mrs.umn.edu
Subject: Re: alt.rnr.punk (Re: alt.music.hardcore to be created
Organization: University of Minnesota, Morris
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 18:18:14 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.015903.4354@spcvxb.spc.edu> 6anthony_m@spcvxb.spc.edu writes:

>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ok next newsgroup.  How about someone creating alt.music.punk or 
>>> rec.music.punk????
>> 
>> My goodness me!  Someone else actually supporting this one.
>> 
>> Well good.  Maybe it might even come about this time round.
>> 
>> --dave
>> Where's my .sig gone?!



>Yeah id love to see a punk newsgroup.  I have no idea how to create one.  Also, 
>how come I cant find alt.music.hardcore?  Do I have to ask a net administrator 
>on my system to pick it up?  Why dont they just pick them all up, instead of 
>choosing which ones they think would be good.  


Try  _tons_ of memory.  Whenever I load up all of the choices, if there are 
more than three users on the server,  I get an out of memory error.  It 
takes the better part of an hour to skim through the titles and pick and 
choose stuff you might like,  much less get in depth.  But anyways,  Im 
fully stoked on seeing a punk subgroup.  I know nothing about setting one 
up, however so all of you out there with REAL compute knowledge, step in 
now...

Nate Miller
Millernr@cab.mrs.umn.edu
Newsgroups: alt.config,sci.aquaria
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: alt.fishies.cichlid (Was: Re: new group -- alt.cichlid)
Organization: Homosexual Fascist Lobby, Rampant Paranoia Division
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 18:49:41 GMT

In article <1992Nov7.064854.29922@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (Joel Furr) writes:

>In article <92311.195258APARKER@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> APARKER@MAINE.MAINE.EDU writes:
>
>>Howdy folks.  I'd like to propose a new aquarium - related newsgroup
>>called alt.cichlid, to deal (obviously) with the Family cichlidae
>>specifically.

"Obviously?"

>A much better name, from an alt. point of view, would be
>alt.fishies.cichlid.  alt.cichlid, by itself, would not give anyone much idea
>what the group was about.  

alt.fishies.cichlid is better, but is a little playful.  Since
alt.aquaria existed at one point (I currently have it aliased to
sci.aquaria), how about alt.aquaria.cichlid?

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu / I use antlers in all of my decorating.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) / 
Newsgroups: alt.config,news.admin,alt.fan.john-palmer
From: guest@mouse.nchu.edu.tw (guestaccount)
Subject: Re: It didn't come from here (Re: test)
Summary: Comic relief... ain't it wunnerful?
Keywords: Jiro and Sean Fegin are at it again, probably.
Organization: NCHU Computer Center
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 14:46:24 GMT

In article <1744@frackit.UUCP> dave@frackit.UUCP (Dave Ratcliffe) writes:
>From: dave@frackit.UUCP (Dave Ratcliffe)
>Subject: Re: It didn't come from here (Re: test)
>Summary: Comic relief... ain't it wunnerful?
>Keywords: Jiro and Sean Fegin are at it again, probably.
>Date: 26 Oct 92 21:40:28 GMT
>In article <1992Oct22.190912.18796@frcs.Alt.ZA>, paul@frcs.Alt.ZA (Paul Nash) writes:
>> Thus spake jp@tygra.Michigan.COM (John Palmer):
>> 
>> > It was created with a forged newgroup message, probably from some miscreants
>> > who like to TRY to annoy me and make this site look bad. It did NOT come 
>> > from any site in the MICHIGAN.COM domain. 
>> >  
>> > There is no "automatic newgroup" program running here - never has been and
>> 
>> ... and anyone who says that there might be such a thing will have
>> the virtual lawyers sic'ed on them, and might even be sold a dud
>> modem (or a dud BBS?).
>
>You know, just when the net starts to get depressing with discussions
>that turn into personal attacks, flame wars that spill into irrelevent
>groups, crossposters from hell and more cascades than is healthy to
>contemplate, along comes John Palmer to lighten our days. 
>
>Is he a wonderful guy or what? 
>
>Let's give him a virtual round of applause shall we?
>
>"     "   <--- (the sound of one hand clapping in virtual reality)
>
>
>-- 
> ...uunet!wa3wbu!frackit!dave -or-                       |  Dave Ratcliffe  |
> frackit!dave@uunet.UU.NET -or- dave@frackit.uucp -or-   |  Sys. <*> Admin. |
> vogon1!compnect!frackit!dave@psuvax1.psu.edu            | Harrisburg,  Pa. |
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: alt.hypnosis
Date: 11 Nov 92 16:18:36 GMT
Organization: Homosexual Fascist Lobby, Rampant Paranoia Division

In article <1992Nov11.024931.15974@news.columbia.edu> jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox) writes:

>  So:  pretend you never saw any previous creation attempts for this.

I can deal with a little ex post facto discussion (but my patience is
wearing thin).

>I'd like to propose a new group to be called alt.hypnosis, for
>discussion of all aspects of hypnosis, trance states, etc.  Comments?

Would alt.psychology.hypnosis be appropriate, seeing as how we have
the possibility of another alt.psychology group simultaneously in the
works?  This is just a question -- I know nothing about psychology or
hypnosis, and so might be dead wrong.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu / I use antlers in all of my decorating.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) / 
Xref: sparky alt.config:6695 rec.music.misc:27030 alt.music.alternative:14896
From: daye@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU (J. Q. Gumby)
Newsgroups: alt.config,rec.music.misc,alt.music.alternative
Subject: Re: How about alt.{music,fan}.they.might.be.giants???
Date: 6 Nov 92 19:07:24 GMT
Distribution: alt
Organization: Computer Science Outreach Services - Oregon State University

Try the mailing list -- send you email address to
	they-might-be-request@gnu.ai.mit.edu

	Much better than a newsgroup...


|Evan Day                | "Plans made in the nursery, can change the
|daye@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU |  course of history.  Remember that."
|^^^^ - preferred e-mail |                          - M. L. Gore               
|FSEJD1@acad3.alaska.edu | Okay, now just who's opinion is that up there?
-- 
|Evan Day                | "Plans made in the nursery, can change the
|daye@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU |  course of history.  Remember that."
|^^^^ - preferred e-mail |                          - M. L. Gore               
|FSEJD1@acad3.alaska.edu | Okay, now just who's opinion is that up there?
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.music.alternative,alt.rock-n-roll.metal.heavy
From: c9221777@cc.newcastle.edu.au (Brother Redeye)
Subject: alt.rnr.punk (Re: alt.music.hardcore to be created
Organization: University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 01:45:38 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.211820.4318@spcvxb.spc.edu>, 6anthony_m@spcvxb.spc.edu writes:
> In article <Bx6LyF.IIH@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au>, fernee@newton.physics.uq.oz.au (Mark Fernee) writes:
>> Following the favorable responses to the suggestion for a
>> guitar based hardcore group, alt.music.hardcore is to be
>> created.
>> 
>> The support for such a group far exceeded any criticisms.
>> 
>> Look out for this new group.
>> 
>> Thankyou all and see you on alt.music.hardcore,
>> 
>> Mark.
> 
> 
> Ok next newsgroup.  How about someone creating alt.music.punk or 
> rec.music.punk????

My goodness me!  Someone else actually supporting this one.

Well good.  Maybe it might even come about this time round.

--dave
Where's my .sig gone?!

Newsgroups: alt.config
From: gix@mdd.comm.mot.com (Brian Gix)
Subject: Re: alt.adoption
Organization: Motorola, Mobile Data Division - Seattle, WA
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:22:58 GMT


I couldn't have stated the reason for the newsgroup better than this...
Bob Alberti writes on alt.adoption:
>
>Hi!  I didn't create this newsgroup, but I had been thinking about doing so.
>I'd thrown together a proposal but had lacked the time to follow up.  Since
>someone has been kind enough to create it for me, allow me to present my
>proposal as a means of generating discussion.
>
>-----
>
>     I would like to propose an alt.adoption group.  This group would be for
>the discussion of the many issues surrounding adoption, including:
>
>     Adoption law:     state and federal laws and proposed changes.
>     Adoption rights:  of birthparent (or bioparent), of adoptee, of parents.
>     Adoption ethics:  what rights to adoptees have?  Does the bioparents'
>		       right to privacy supercede an adoptee's right to know?
>     Adoptee searches: news and support for individuals involved in their
>		       searches.
>     Adoptions:        children available for adoption, news of families
>		       recently adopted, support and comments for families with
>		       adoptees.
>     Special adoptees: handicapped adoption, mixed-race adoption and cross-
>		       cultural adoption, older adoptees and foster children,
>		       adoptees into families with non-adopted children.
>
>     I am an adoptee, and so are a significant portion of the population as
>a whole, so I feel many of net-people will have an interest in this group.
>
>-----
>I'm currently engaged in my adoption search.  Are there any other searchers
>out there?
>--
>Bob Alberti: Computer & Information Services U of MN   |aka: Albatross| Unitar-
>Internet   : alberti@boombox.micro.umn.edu             |Metropolis BBS| ian/
>Disclaimer : My employer does not mean what I say.     |(612) 721-1870| Univer-
>Ingredients: 30% header, 30% quote, 10% comment, 30% cutesy signature.| salist!


-- 
--Brian Gix                       Motorola
  gix@mdd.comm.mot.com            Mobile Data Division
  (206) 487-5894                  #include <disclaimer.h>
From: monaghan@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (N.O. Monaghan)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: alt.revolution.counter - to be created - details
Date: 7 Nov 92 17:22:33 GMT
Organization: Glasgow University Computing Science Dept.

The group alt.revolution.counter will shortly be created.
It will be unmoderated.

It stems from a mailing list of which it is felt that
it would be more useful as a newsgroup, allowing more
general access and removing the need for physically
subscribing/unsubscribing members and forwarding messages.

The group alt.revolution.counter will cover amongst other
discussions:

	monarchism
	distributism
	integrism
	corporatism
	subsidarity

It is planned that in addition to general discussions on
these and other topics, there will be book reviews and details
of relevant journals and organizations. Some of this information
might usefully be posted monthly in a regularly updated
posting.

There is also the possibility of establishing some sort
of archive for selected materials that are posted.

Nils.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
N.O. Monaghan

monaghan@dcs.gla.ac.uk
Xref: sparky alt.config:6868 alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.d:9083
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.d
Subject: Re: Newgroup:  ALT.BINARIES.PICTURES.NUDE
From: MWEAVER@VITRO.COM (Mike Weaver)
Date: 12 Nov 92 13:54:31 -0500
Followup-To: alt.config,alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.d
Organization: Vitro Corporation
Nntp-Posting-User: terrwm

In article <FnIArACJBh107h@momad.UUCP>, taz@momad.UUCP (Jon N.) writes:
> 
> HERE IS A PROPOSAL:
> 
> 
> 	In light of the recent postings of questionable pictures of nudity, I 
>         propose a new news.group, "ALT.BINARIES.PICTURES.NUDE"  
> 
> 	This newsgroup will be for posting of pictures of the human body, but 
>         not necessarily in a sexual manner.  This should not become a place
> 	for posting nude children, but for nude PEOPLE, adult or children.
> 
> 	ALT.BINARIES.PICTURES.EROTICA can remain as a forum for sexually 
> 	explicit pictures, whereas clean nudity, without direct sexual
> 	connotation, will be posted in ALT.BINARIES.PICTURES.NUDE.
> 
> 
> 	Please send your votes on this subject publicly, please reply
> 	to this message.   Thank you.
> 
> 
-- 

Tally up another Yea vote.  Good idea!

          ______________________________________________________________________
         /  Michael C. Weaver	        Modern music for Modern times!
        /    _____                      Internet: weaver@vitro.com
__     /   \/itro Corporation	        Voice:    (301) 231-3234
  \   /    M/S 4-3409                   ________________________________________
   \ /     14000 Georgia Ave.           | "Hey Andy, are you goofin' on Elvis?"|
    V      Silver Spring, MD 20906-2972 | REM - Automatic for the People       |
                                        ----------------------------------------
          <<<<<<<Since I have no views, they're nobody elses!>>>>>>>
                       <<<<<<Viewless & Clueless>>>>>>>
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: mdw@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Matt Welsh)
Subject: Re: CFD: alt.qixnews
Organization: Cornell Theory Center
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 06:11:06 GMT

In article <1992Nov7.050955.26565@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mporter@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mitchell Porter) writes:
>I would like to propose the creation of alt.qixnews.
>
>PROPOSED CHARTER
>
>alt.qixnews, in brief, would be for discussions that don't fit comfortably
>within any particular category... interdisciplinary topics, radically new
>topics, shunned topics, weird topics. A quick list of some of the things
>that might be addressed:

Try talk.bizarre.

mdw

-- 
Matt Welsh    mdw@tc.cornell.edu        +1 607 253 2737
Systems Programmer, Cornell Theory Center
  "She's like jelly roll, like sculpture!"
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Subject: Re: Proposal:  Alt.hypnosis
Reply-To: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 03:31:58 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.021355.13690@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> slb22@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Seth L. Blumberg) writes:
>In article <u-SArAaPBh107h@momad.UUCP> list%momad@Infoserv.com writes:
>>Proposal:   ALT.HYPNOSIS
>>
>>This group is for discussion of hypnosis, from the medical/
>>psychological uses, to "stage" hypnosis, discussing myths
>>and realities of such
>
>Since we're all currently discussing a group on hypnosis and a group on
>Myers-Briggs and similar personality tests, why not call them, respectively,
>
>	alt.psychology.hypnosis
>and
>	alt.psychology.personality
>?
>
>IMHO, this sort of hierarchicalizing is desirable, even on altnet....

  I agree that hierarchicalizing is desirable, but:

  a) The charter (as stated above, and I agree with it) includes more
than the theraputic uses of hypnosis, whereas I think the name
alt.psychology.hypnosis would tend to restrict that.

  b) [this is a worse reason] there have already been some
poorly-accepted semi-bogus newgroup messages for alt.hypnosis, and I'd
rather, if at all possible, keep the occurance of duplicate,
aliased-to-each-other groups to a minimum, for reasons one can see in
the current alt.dragons-inn/alt.pub.dragons-inn confusion.

  If enough people would prefer alt.psychology.hypnosis, that will of
course overrule reason b, but other things being equal, I think it
would just make things much simpler to keep the shorter name.

  Comments?

--
Jonathan Lennox
jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.personals.misc,alt.self-improve,misc.education,misc.jobs.misc,misc.misc,sci.misc,sci.psychology
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: alt.president.clinton
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Date: 5 Nov 92 22:51:28 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Nov5.162934.13614@news.ysu.edu>, doug@cc.ysu.edu (Doug Sewell) writes:
> My system no longer automatically creates alt-groups.  Further, I have
> X'd this group in my active file, so they don't end up in junk.

> Thou shalt discuss alt-groups in alt.config, or thou shalt not see them
> on my system.

Yea, me too.  There's just too much stuff to be able to tell the wheat from
the chaff anymore.

Please, if you want to make a group, just drop a line here first.  Sure,
some people will "object", but that doesn't mean you can't have your group.
It just means that some people will "object" -- and maybe -- just maybe --
you'll find their "suggestions" helpful in choosing a name.  (Or maybe
you'll find out that a group already exists for what you want).

Many thanks,

Terry J. Wood
University of Pittsburgh
Computing and Information Services
Systems and Networks Group
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: CFD: Newsgroup For Personality Typing Systems (e.g. Myers-Briggs)
Date: 11 Nov 92 18:38:47 GMT
Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Stuff & Nonsense Division

In article <2B0128BE.3DF4@deneva.sdd.trw.com> kieffer@spf.trw.com (Robert Kieffer) writes:

>"alt.personality" gets my vote.  Keep it simple and visible.

alt.psychology.personality seems pretty simple and visible to me.  How
does that sound?

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu / I use antlers in all of my decorating.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
From: barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za (Alan P Barrett)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: Creating alt.united.we.stand.america
Date: 7 Nov 1992 15:41:59 +0200
Organization: Dept. Elec. Eng., Univ. Natal, Durban, S. Africa
NNTP-Posting-Host: daisy.ee.und.ac.za

In article <Bx8wpF.Kqp@rice.edu>,
byrd@lucerne.rice.edu (Marc J Byrd) writes:
> Distribution: usa

No thanks.  If it's to be a net-wide group then it must have a net-wide
discussion.

> Several of us over in the alt.politics.perot newsgroup would like to form
> a newsgroup for our budding political (un-political) party, United We Stand,
> America.  

Please use dots only for hierarchical boundaries.  Where it is
necessary to use several words to describe a node in the hierarchy, use
hyphens to separate the words.  For example, united.we.stand uses dots
inappropriately; united-we-stand would be much better (but has another
problem, namely that it is longer than 14 chars).

Please include a .usa component at an appropriate level in the name.  For
example, use alt.politics.usa.*, or usa.politics.*.

alt.politics.united.we.stand.america    no no no
alt.politics.usa.*                      put the .usa at a sensible position
                .united-we-stand        longer than the 14-char limit
                .united-stand           might be OK

--apb
Alan Barrett, Dept. of Electronic Eng., Univ. of Natal, Durban, South Africa
RFC822: barrett@ee.und.ac.za                    Bang: m2xenix!undeed!barrett
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: phaedrus@halcyon.com (Mark Phaedrus)
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: ALT.WEREWOLVES
Organization: The 23:00 News and Mail Service
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 06:30:33 GMT

One vote for.  (Would a werewolf get to cast two votes? :)
-- 
\o\ Internet: phaedrus@halcyon.com  (Seattle, WA Public Access Unix)     \o\
 \o\ "How'd you like to move a few steps down the food chain, pal?"       \o\
  \o\ If you enjoy fantasy/SF stories with transformation themes, email me \o\
   \o\ for a copy of the Transformation Stories List.                       \o\