From: bufalini@across.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Bruce Bufalini's daily routine (was Re: The Politics of USENET)
Summary: Biff doesn't like religion
Keywords: Patrick doesn't waste Bruce's time
Date: 26 Jul 92 18:45:02 GMT
Reply-To: bufalini@across.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Distribution: na
Organization: Pep$i $tate Univer$ity
X-Roger-Taylor-Quote: Don't get into religion, it tends to fuck people up.
X-Backmasking-Message: steliot sevol ylleK kciR
X-Advertisement: Buy a Honda.
X-Bruce-Bufalini-Quote: Better to get laid than laid off.
X-Political-Statement: K e n   R o b i n s o n for President in 2032.
X-Whoosh: WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH
X-Subliminal-Message: IBM 370 assembler sucks big time.
X-Oggle: OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE

In article <1992Jul26.085105.6942@rice.edu>, patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>In article <pqa1H0hlp8@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@among.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>>In article <1992Jul26.052911.3068@rice.edu>, patrick@is.rice.edu (Old enough to be informed) writes:
>>>In article <5w81Hhn7p8@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@among.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
>>>>In article <1992Jul25.062838.2772@rice.edu>, patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>>>>>In article <e!31Hfido8@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>>>>>>In article <1992Jul24.051323.22097@rice.edu>, patrick@is.rice.edu (One group at a time, please.) writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't communicate with imaginary entities.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nor do I.  You still have not gathered any facts, Patrick.  I do not talk to
>>>>>>imaginary entities, for DOI is not imaginary.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sure, Bruce.  Can you prove that?  No?  So much for you, then.
>>>>
>>>>I don't have to prove that it exists.  You have to prove that it does not
>>>>exist, which you have so far failed to do.  Congratulations.
>>>
>>>Sorry, weenie -- you made the assertion, you get to prove it.  Not that I'd
>>>believe you even in the unlikely event you *could* prove it...
>>
>>I told it to you before: 478 East Beaver Avenue, State College, PA, 16801 is
>>DOI's location.  Point proven.
>
>Hardly.  That's your address.  All you have shown is that your precious
>"DOI" exists in your imagination -- thus, it is of no concern to anyone
>else.  (Apparently, neither are you.)

No, you must come to 478 East Beaver Avenue to prove my point null, for DOI is
headquartered there.  Then DOI will no longer be a part of your imagination.

>>>>>>You apparently cared enough to lie about DOI, relating it to islands in the
>>>>>>pits of hell.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's not my fault if you don't know any of the local dialect.  Funny that
>>>>>your precious (and imaginary) "DOI" couldn't inform you of that.
>>>>
>>>>Who gives a freaking shit about your local dialect?  The Department of
>>>>Information need not inform individuals about irrelevant drivel in the Pits of
>>>>Hell.
>>>
>>>No one down here gives a damn about your neck of the woods, either -- and
>>>there are about 40 times as many folks down here to ignore you as there are
>>>up there ignoring us.  Thanks, once again, for demonstrating conclusively
>>>that you have no earthly idea of what you babble about...
>>
>>At least we are much higher on the intellect level than you folks at Rice
>>University are.  Communication with DOI @ 478 E. Beaver Ave. seems to help the
>>local residents.
>
>That's not my problem.  I'd be a bit worried about anyone else in State
>College, though, if they sought communication with some imaginary entity --
>but as long as that particular psychosis is confined to your neighborhood,
>then I can devote my attention to more important things.

Good.  Then we can enjoy watching you lead a misinformed lifestyle, for
everyone here is leading healthy, informed lifestyles thanks to DOI.  Look for
DOI to start a branch in Houston, Texas in the near future.

>>>>>>Wrong, for I am informed of everything.  You are still going to jail, Patrick,
>>>>>>so get ready for it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sure, Bruce.  I'm going to jail like your DOI really exists.  Enjoy your
>>>>>fantasy.
>>>>
>>>>What fantasy?  DOI does exist; therefore, you are going to jail, as I asserted
>>>>before.
>>>
>>>Imaginary entities still don't exist, so they're not putting me in jail --
>>>you assert, but you can't prove.  Like I said, ask me if I care about your
>>>fantasy...
>>
>>But you are going to jail.  You seem to be quite misinformed, for DOI has been
>>proven to exist.
>
>The only place I'm going tonight is home, once I get off work in about four
>and a half hours (as of 0330 CDT), assuming the outbound Southwest Freeway
>isn't shut down somewhere between Kirby and Westpark for more of the Eternal
>Reconstruction Project...

DOI news flash:  Outbound Southwest Freeway is closed indefinitely and the
only detour leads to jail.  Congratulations, Patrick, for you have finally
achieved your goal in life: a one-way trip to jail.

>>>>>>>Maybe that's all you have to do in your daily routine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wrong, asshole.  Observe:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I was wrong, I see.  You have nothing whatsoever in your daily routine,
>>>>>apparently.
>>>>
>>>>Yes, you are always wrong.  You are also illiterate, for you were apparently
>>>>incapable of understanding what I posted.  Now let's see your daily routine,
>>>>Mr. Humphrey.
>>>
>>>When hell freezes over.  My daily routine is none of your business.
>>
>>Probably because you do nothing all day.  Can we say "Lazy Ass," boys and
>>girls?
>
>I sleep all day, I'll agree -- because I work at night during the summer.
>You daytimers ought to stay up late (what you call late) once in a while and
>see what you're missing out on.

I stay up late all the time, so I'm not missing out on anything.  Can we
say "PATRICK IS STILL A LAZY ASS," boys and girls?

>>>>>Are you sure you're alive?  :-)
>>>>
>>>>I must say I appear to be quite alive. :-)
>>>
>>>Great proof -- of course, someone with access to the right password could do
>>>all that...anyway, your brain sure doesn't appear to be among the living.
>>>Now, let's hear some more of your famous lobotomized-parrot responses...
>>
>>No, no one possesses my password.  Perhaps you would care to prove otherwise.
>>My brain has always been among the living, while yours appears to be
>>indefinitely out for repairs.
>
>Response #848.  I knew you wouldn't let me down.

Response #848 is irrelevant.  And I see you had no problem with my assertion
about your brain.

>>>     "Can't have everything.  Where would you put it?" -- Steven Wright
>>
>>No brain for Patrick... no place to put it.
>
>Too bad there are so many people out there who know you're misinformed -- I
>guess the "DOI" just isn't what it used to allegedly be...

Name every person who thinks I'm misinformed.  Nobody, eh?  You, sir, are the
one who is misinformed and whose opinions are irrelevant, for your statement
takes the form of an unwarranted extrapolation and is being thrown out at once.
DOI has always been and will always be a thriving organization, thanks to
myself and K e n   R o b i n s o n.

>    *"The opinions expressed by Patrick do not necessarily represent those
>             of Rice staff, management, or any living person."*

Although a dead person could make much more sense than you could ever dream of
making.

-- 
Bruce A. Bufalini (bufalini@gis.psu.edu)  |   In the Basement Bars,
PSU Geographic Information Systems        |   In the Backs of Cars,
                                          |   Be Cool or Be Cast Out.
                                          |
                                          |     -Neil Peart, 1982