HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: ADMISSION. [was : Spineless michele etc]
Date: 25 Jan 93 12:46:43 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <932125142135@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk>, STUCS204@IBM3090.BHAM.AC.UK (Richard Thomas) writes:
> ==============================================================================
> Well we finally have an admission from the prize moron...
> 
> [much infighting between Mona and Michel(l)e deleted - usual reasons]
> and then Michel(l)e "I am soooooooooooo butch" D'allagamincer says
> 
> What can be said about that then? The rumour has been confirmed by the horses m
> outh himself. He is still at FAGLAB. Hold on he called it faglab. GASP. Another
>  admission from our normally butch boy. He was considered the most macho and fu
> nny likeable guy. At faglab? This means that three men, in tight white tee-shir
> ts, tight black leather outfits and with matching mustaches (we are talking Blu
> e Oyster Bar in Police Academy here) said to him "Do you mind if we slip our st
> ools around you, big boy?" and "How's about it big boy?" etc etc.
> As he says Macho does not mean shit.
> Could they have been lying to you?
> I think so.

No, sorry, you are wrong. My experiment is to measure the 
temperature of the assholes of fags as you after two hours 
of buttfucking with my flaming dick. 

I know, you would like to try, but it is quite expensive. 
Anyway, if you can afford it, I can send you a form.
> 
> TTFN pastaboy.
       ^^^^^^^

Pastaboy?!? Hey, pasta is good food! Last evening I 
made a big pasta with tomatoes and olives:

	W O N D E R F U L 

Do you wanna try it? Let me know, that I buy the poison.

> Richard Thomas.

	Michele

P.S.	Moana, do you have any good receipt to send me? You 
	know I am learning how to cook, but the american
	girls cook something like spaghetti and meatballs. 
	Disgusting, I need an Italian woman to learn it...
From: serickso@ub.d.umn.edu (Scott Erickson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Andy, limedicks, the Brady Brunch, and cannibalism
Date: 22 Jan 1993 14:31:49 -0600
Organization: University of Confused Thought
Distribution: alt
Reply-To: serickso@ub.d.umn.edu (Scott)
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu


Previously 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu gushed: 
[bullshit deleted]
>> Andy, you cheap slut.  You'll write a limerick for
>> anyone.  Well how about a theme a song:
 
>> Here's the story, of a man named Andy,
>> Who was busy with three boys of his own,
>> He kept them, chained in his basement,
>> So he was not alone.
 
>> Then one day this Andy met a policeman,
>> An officer who acted on a hunch,
>> He searched, through Andy's basement,
>> And that's how Andy got his gruesome lunch!

>> His gruesome lunch! etc.
 
>> Melvin M. Gladstone

>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! SO TRUE! ANDY. JEFFREY DAHMER. CONNECTION?

>JEFF WITTY
>ARMY R.O.T.C.
>a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY

If this is the kind of humor that the rotsy pretty boys finds entertaining,
then I can understand why they are not given real jobs in the U.S. military.
It is such a shame that rotsy fags are actually allowed in the U.S. military.
They all like to pretend that they are so tough, so mighty, but the truth is,
they are craven cowards who hide behind scholarships and their academic
"studies."  During the entire Gulf war, the rotsy sissies sat in their dorm
rooms, scared shitless that they will be called to duty, while the real men
and women were out on the front line, risking their lives for their government.
To a man (when I say man, I say it with poetic license), the ROTC consists of
academic underachievers who are not capable enough to get any other type of
financial aid to attend college.

--
Scott Erickson                                         serickso@ub.d.umn.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson)
Subject: Re: A Confession
Organization: Dept. of Scientific Computing, Uppsala Univ.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 15:50:29 GMT

Rob Dobson (rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU) wrote:
: I butt-fucked Michele's mom, but that was when i was young. I didnt
: like it, and I didnt inhale. It was DEFINITELY a mistake thaat I regret.
: 

I guess you'll just have to inhale the next time, then.

/Par
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A Day in the life of: Rob Dobson
Date: 22 Jan 93 03:22:05 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <C16wzD.MDK@cmptrc.lonestar.org>, andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
> 
> Uh, Twitty?
> 
> Your story... well, your story *sucked*.
> 
> Not that Rob isn't a complete no-life loser, but if you're 
> going to do story flames, get a basic grasp of the english language first.

What? No rhyme? I expected a better flame than that. I actually stood up
for you the other day too! Some guy e-mailed me and said you were a stupid 
Texan wanna be, cocksucker, and all around useless humaniod slime terd!
I came to your defence and said you were a Texan!
> 
> -- Andy

JEFF WITTY
ARMY R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY

p.s. Don't hide your feelings for Rob. Everyone knows you wanna be the loser
     he is, instead of beeing the low-life lower you are. Why else would
     you come to his aid by (trying and failing) to flame me.
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: To be fired for a pregnancy.
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 02:35:57 GMT

In article <1993Jan24.161331.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <1993Jan24.095946.12560@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>>I wrote:
>
>> VERY GOOD, MICHELE!!!  FOR THE FIRST TIME YOU ARE RIGHT. There *are*
>> many women who would lose their jobs if they got pregnant!  And if
>> they want to keep their job, I think that they should realise that.
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^******^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>> And if they don't want to lose their job, and don't feel bad about
>> sacrificing childbirth, then they should just go ahead and keep their
>> jobs and not get pregnant IF THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT.
>> 
>
>OK. I am sure that you flamed yourself. Maybe I am wrong, 
>but what you wrote is for me very cold and *sexist*. I am 
>not the one that have to judge. 
Let me enlighten the dark recesses of your mind.  I have not flamed myself.
I have flamed you.  You are wrong.  What I have written is not cold.  Nor
is it sexist.  I say, "Women should realise that in today's workplace,
one can get fired for getting pregnant.  That is why before the woman
decides to get pregnant, she must think about if she would be happier
working, or raising children.  And good luck to her, for whatever she
chooses."

No sexism there.  Nor above.  You missed again.


Now I ask to the women what 
>they think, because I am tired to deal with a guy that write 
>such a bullshit.

Getting a little tired?  A thought so.  I didn't think you would
last long.  I'm sure many of your girlfriends/rape victims would
agree with me there.
From: moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Sadness
Date: 24 Jan 93 22:23:36 GMT
Organization: Washington University,  St Louis MO

Another warwick microbrain, (Mr T Moxey) writes:
>
>2) To the person that said that job requirements are low in Britain, um, sure
>they are. Makes sense doesn't it?? The US being the clever people that 
>they are!! Well, sorry, but at the age of 17, the British level of 
>understanding at college is equivalent to what your countries 19 year 
>olds are coping with. Get it right.

Please, Mr Moxey, don't tell us crap. We all have an example of the
level of understanding of the Brits. Just refer to ~the GREAT NAME 
postings to get a better idea. Ah, and also your meaningful post
confirm our theory.

But there will be the time in which the Brits will stop to look at themselves
as the owners of the truth? 
  "We are intellingent, we are smart, we are the best ..."
You are *all* balls full of compressed air, and your geographical
position saved yourselves (up to now) from being pinned by the rest of
the world population. What a nice show will be to see you all explode!

>3) Flaming or whatever it is, seems to consist of writing complete crap, and
>trying to be extra hard by using obscene language. Sort it out. You want to be
>hard, go to South Central LA, let's see how long you'd last. And yes, before 
>you ask, I've lived there, and with attitudes that you've got, you'd not 
>last a second. 
>
>So, just thought I'd post this, hope you don't cry too much. If you are ever in
>England, then drop me a line, I'll meet you, then we'll really see how hard you
>are.

The perfect example of blather. First he spews wisdom about Michele
(and although the target is right, your flame is pathetic), and then he
claims to be the macho-men number 2 of the network. What an asshole!

Give us a break, and come back to your warwick institute for mental 
diseases, swollen Brit!

Moana.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Beer, me Mason!
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 22:11:52 GMT

In article <katherim.727821419@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>
>>alt.flame:"Come on Graley! You take forever, are you going to flame me or not?"
>
>>Graley:"I'll do it... I'll do it... Don't make me..."
>
>>alt.flame:"I don't have all day..."
>
>>Graley:"I'll really get 'ya... I will..."
>
>><<Several days later>>
>
>>alt.flame:"Graley, you are completely incompetent, I'd rather read what Michele
>>has to say than wait for your 'scoarching' flame."
>
>>Graley:"That does it-- F***ing F***ing F***!!! You Bloody Arse hole of a
>>F***ing F***."

This description reminds me of Liz.  Always dancing around the argument.
Of course, in the place of Graley's subatomic wit would be: "Duh, you guys!
Get a clue!  Deal with my ignorance, all right?  GAWD!"

Still waiting for the big punches, Liz.
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Phantom Exposed: His real name is Vinson Scott Goddard!
Date: 26 Jan 93 23:47:40 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1k1ce6INNet1@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
> In article <1993Jan25.145414.25739@fuug.fi> an7898@anon.penet.fi writes:

[Crap deleted]
> 
> How can we EVER take this man seriously again? Vinson Scott Goddard!!!

Damn? Graley...you're messing with fire. First you get destroyed by me
for fuckin with my name, now you want Phantom to come kicking your ass.
Do you have some kinda perverted delusion that your actually funny when
you flame a name? Your name is the biggest joke of all. It's so flexable.
You leave in your initials for all to take a shot at. Rhymes and edited 
versions of names are old. Fuckin with Initials are better. Example?
Jeff Shitty. *yawn* Old.                
Mr. J(askass) S(on of a bitch) Graley. Lots of room to be creative. 
Only low life scum such as you can rewrite a name. It takes someone 
creative and WITTY to make parodies of your initials.
> 
> No wonder he was trying to stop people discovering his name...
> 
> hahahahahahaaha 

What? No caps? Ah! I know what happened! You accidently hit the caps lock
key when you were masterbating. Hence, you turned it off. 
> 
> ~THE GREAT NAME  

Great shame to the British.                                       
> -- 
>     Don't worry,                
>      Its like in the comic books...
>       ITS NOT REAL!

JEFF WITTY
ARMY R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY      
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:38:50 GMT
Subject: Re: Rush Myth #307
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: alt.flame

Rush.Fat.Pig is a Penis.
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Intellectuals & women
Date: 24 Jan 93 17:44:21 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan24.220749.4526@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
> In article <1993Jan24.061211.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
> 
> Sure.  I understand, and that is perfectly reasonable.  But life is full
> of regrets, full of "I could have done this..."  But it is for the individ-
> ual to try to find his or her own fulfillment.  If they can't...that's life.
> It is better that they find it on their own then to have fools like you
> decide for them.

[Jason, flame off, please]

I-do-not-want-to-decide-for-anybody-but-me. Can you 
understand this? Sometime we say the same thing, and other 
times, we just wanna flame. My point is not to enforce 
anybody. My point is to let a woman to work and to care 
abouyt family if SHE WANTS TO DO THAT.

I can give you an example of what I think:

Italy, 1992. I was in a corporation, I was supposed to become 
a manager. There were 10 positions. All of the 10 people 
choosen were male. All the women complained about that,
as it is obvious that it happens.

On the same corporation, one woman, a secretary, had the 
need to stay home every afternoon with her children. She 
had not the husband. She had to fight *alone* six month to 
convince the boss to do that. Some women were complaining 
that it was not fair that she had such an opportunity.[sic]

I belive that everywoman have to have such an *opportunity*.
This world is tough, it does not mean that we don't have to 
improve it.

Also, there are employers that ask to women to sign a letter 
where the woman declare that if she has a child, she will 
resign. It is not legal, but it happens. 

Those things scares the women. Those things can induce the 
woman to think that to have a child is a bad business. 
To induce a woman to think in this way, is a moral crime
(on my morality, sure).

Maybe now you understand better my point. I don't want to 
enforce women to think that they are baby-machines, I would 
like to stop the society to induce women to think that 
having a child, they can lose everything else.

To do it, society needs to have a different vision of woman 
that work, a larger one. 
> 
>>
> By the way, you haev conveniently deleted my last post. 

Sorry, but you did cut some point of mine, I did not like it.

> I am still
> waiting for all those supporters of yours to make themselves known to me.

They do what they want to do. I can't enforce them to dedice 
to show up. It is alt.flame.

> Also, the names of the three-hundred year old women I asked for before
> is still something I need to have.

That's a point that you conveniently cut before. I said 
that *you* think that they were not happy, but that, *maybe* 
they were happy. I just told you that you could not *proove* 
anything about that. Neither with the history books.

Anyway, do you think that the Native American women were not 
happy? Let me know, just for fun.
> 
	Michele
From: liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: 23 Jan 1993 15:49:05 GMT
Organization: WPI - so much stress were giving it away
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <6996@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca> king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King) writes:
>In article <1jigrqINNhfp@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>>And your proof is?  Please, post it for all to see.
>
>Anyone who read the last dozen or so articles posted by you already has
>seen all the necessary proof, Lizzie darling.
>

Oooh, witty.  I'm sure that's one of those lovely comebacks Patty was
discussing earlier...

>>Anybody with half a brain (and this obviously does not include you) knows
>>that any newsgroup with the word "flame" in its title is not going to be
>>a breeding ground for intelligent discussions.  
>
>It used to be. That is, before you came along.

Nifty!  It's nice to know that I, and I alone, am responsible for the
demise of alt.flame.  

Get real.  I hardly doubt that I am worse then the fuck-spewing idiots
like Graley.  I'm sure you read those posts and have a hearty laugh,
am I right?  Yeah, sure...


>>but more with the nature of the newsgroup and the attitudes of the posters.  
>
>Not necessarily. Alt.flame is what we make it. 

Exactly.  And your attitude towards the group will decide what kind of
posts you will make to it, whether they be witty statements of humor
or "fuck fuck FUCK!"  That has nothing to do with the intelligence
level of the poster.  I give you all at least a little credit for
having some brains...even if you do post "fuck fuck fuck".  Just
because you make stupid posts does not mean you are a stupid person.

>Shut up and watch for a while - you'll see.

I did...I lurked for a good two months.  You know what I saw?  Postings about
male and female genetalia, postings of "OOGLE OOGLE OOGLE" and "fuck fuck
FUCK!", and once in a great while, something funny.  And you say *I* am
responsible for the demise of alt.flame?  


						--Liz
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson)
Subject: Re: Par-Zero Picks a Fight?   [Was Re: Pick up lines]
Organization: Dept. of Scientific Computing, Uppsala Univ.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:54:50 GMT

Andy Hart (andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org) wrote:
: (Par Svensson) writes without provocation:
: >Who gave you permission to speak for "Witty"? Go back to having your
: >ass licked by that Italian rag, and lay off the moronities we all know
: >you're fully capable of anyway. At least, when Jorn speaks for you,
: >we get a nauseating .sig, instead of your pachydermic yawnings.
: >
: >/Par
: 
: Par, are you picking a fight with me?
: 
: -- Andy

Naah, I wouldn't do that.

/Par
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Date: 28 Jan 1993 15:48:49 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: parsley.csv.warwick.ac.uk
Keywords: Only 20 shopping days left till Valentine's Day.

In article <C1JoLA.5nM@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
|(Mr J S Graley) writes:
|>That _does_ explain a lot. Fuck off you irish git, and take your stupid 
|>bombs with you. You fucking irish are fucking cowards. All you can do is
|>leave bombs in public places. You don't give a fuck who you kill, as long
|>as youre miles away when it happens. You kill innocent people. Men, women, 
|>children. Little babies, too. Often, they have a lingering, painful death,
|>with their weak bodies laccerated by your flying debris.
|>
|>Fuck you, you murdering arsehole.
|>
|>If I saw a member of the IRA, and I had a gun, yeh, I'd kill the bastard. 
|>There and then. So take note, fart, you are a bastard. You are hated by all
|>and with good reason.
|>
|>You may have uttered some crap. I don't recall. I don't listen to murdering 
|>bastards. They talk crap.
|>
|>Fucking irish. A couple of centuries ago, we'd have come and killed the lot
|>of you for what your IRA do. Now, due to the peaceful society we created, you
|>get away with it. Fuck off. I hope you get killed by one of your bombs.
|>
|
|
|What, you think I'm going to start defending the IRA because I'm part Irish?
|I'm also English, French, and Indian.  

Fucking mongrel. You fucking part Irish, part English, part French, part Indian
people fuck me off etc etc etc...

|It's interesting that now that you've discovered lower case, you're actually 
|trying to form *opinions*.  

heh, yeh, I guess my having stated many times that YOU ARE AN ARSEHOLE does not
count as an opinion, rather a solid fact, accepted as so by all.

|Besides it's not my problem that the british are unable to control a 
|subjugated people.  

You come and control them, arsehole. Or suggest a way of stopping a complete 
stranger leaving a shopping bag with a bomb in it in a crowded shopping area.

Idiot.

|-- Andy

~THE GREAT NAME
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: Kevin Walsh <kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: General Wankin' Witless posts incoherent crap once more.
Date: 22 Jan 93 16:42:06 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <1993Jan21.003653.13885@bsu-ucs> 01jwwitless@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
> In article <1993Jan20.164335.17230@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>, Mark B. writes:
> > 
> > As for you, Jeff. Can't you think up anything better than copying 
> > a Haushalter post? Currently, one of your flabby (f)lames receives 
> > an average of 4 toasty hot retorts. That's 4:1, Jeff. 
> > 
> > Get the message yet? 
> 
> That your ignorant? yes.
>
What the fuck does that mean?  "That your ignorant..."  errrrmmmmm.
OH!  You mean "That you're ignorant."  I get it, shite.

>
> > You are outnumbered. Put those wagons in a circle, soldier! 
> > There'll be no Cavalry this time.
> >
> I fight to the death. Tell me, did you come prepared? NOT!
>
There you go again with your incoherent bollocks.

> 
> > 
> > Oops. Time to go firebomb the American Consulate.
> > 
> > Cheers!
> 
> Hee-hee, your so blind. Quit sucking up to Euro-scum. 
>
Another of your "your/you're" mixups.  You really ought to stop
playing with your toy soldiers and "action men" and get on
with those English lessons.

Why does the US army win wars?  It'd be embarrassing to have
General Wankin' Witless write out the surrender note.

A Private enters General Witless's quarters:

    "Errr... General Witless, Sir?"
    "Yes, what is it, Private Parts?"
    "Permission to speak freely, Sir."
    "Granted."
    "I think you should just get a life and fuck off out of the Army, Sir."
    "Thank you Private Parts, I'll consider that in the battle plan."
    "Yes Sir, General Witless, Sir."

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     Professor Kevin Walsh
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@gold.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Hamper: Spaghetti-O's!!!!
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:04:04 GMT

In article <C1HxK0.M95@world.std.com> martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan) writes:
>In article <C1HE13.1wG@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@redviolet.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>Hello?
>>
>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>
>Oh my god. Is this the famous K e n ? If it is I agree: You're an idiot.

Thank you for sharing your stupidity with us. It is most appreciated.

k e N   R o B i N s o N
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: The ghost of a little dog.
Date: 24 Jan 93 03:12:50 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan23.171439.1@acad.drake.edu>, vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
> In article <1993Jan23.155219.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
> 
>> No, he isn't. To be clairvoyant, one needs to be a first 
>> class ghost. My bet is that he is the ghost of a dog.
> 
> Ooooooooh! Wop! What a retort! Gee, how the hell can I respond to that example
> of Italian achievment?

He, he, he, he.... So you don't know how to answer! 

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Little ghost was a dog, beattlejuice was the dog of Liz. 
Little ghost came to alt.flame because he mist Liz.

He, he, he, he, he... That's why you're always arfing 
instead to write a good english...

Aren't you jealous of the dawg (butwhatthefuckisadawg?!?) of 
Rob? It married her!

BWAHWHAHAHAHAH. Poor ghost, your life has to be sad, now.

Here, 25 cents for a bone.

	Michele