HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bush vomit
Date: 31 Aug 92 17:03:39 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <e4PcqB2w165w@fennec.sccsi.com> popec@fennec.sccsi.com (William C. Barwell) writes:
>A few posts back, there was a suggestion, Bush = To vomit.
>In Japan the phrase that was coined was "Bushita", meaning to vomit.
>Bushita! Bushita! Bushita!
>
>----------------
>William C. Barwell [popec@fennec.sccsi.com]  //  Pope Charles

Ever since The Master's trip to Japan, I've had trouble
watch TV commercials for Busch Beer.  Anyone else 
similarly afflicted?


-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: ejohnso@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Eric Johnson)
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 21:51:31 GMT

In <la64i8INN5pr@news.bbn.com> saustin@bbn.com (Steve Austin) writes:

>  Isn't it obvious that the guy who is on the way out is going to concentrate
>on (deliberately) fucking things up for the next guy after they have
>lost their mandate?


Exactly.  Remember the Susan B Anthony dollar?

(Okay, it was an apointee who did it, but you get the idea...)
-- 
    Eric Johnson	         |  Commit random acts of kindness and
    ejohnso@ccu.umanitoba.ca 	 |         senseless beauty.
_____________________________________________________________________________
       The Johnsons are taking over.  - William Burroughs
From: barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Quayle/Bush Competency?
Date: 25 Aug 92 16:44:34 GMT
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

To all Bush and Quayle bashers--

  Though a registered independent myself, I find myself drawn to the
defense of our President and Veep.  First off, the free trade agree-
ment with Mexico, though much maligned, is a good one.  A good deal of
crime in the southwest US can be attributed to illegal immigrants.
Now while this bill won't stop the flood of ill-imm's, it does address
the issue that if our neighbor (Mexico) prospers, we will prosper some
as well (fewer ill-imms).  If they fail, that failure will cause
thousands of people willing to do almost anything to support them-
selves and/or their families to flee to our country.  Unable to find
jobs (or at least decent jobs) here, they turn to crime, the one
occupation which never seems to suffer from economic hard times.  So,
it _is_ in our best interests to see Mexico profit.  Now, one might
argue that, while helping others is all fine and dandy, it's something
altogether different when it starts costing jobs.  True, the point is
conceded, but look at the long-term effects.  Protectionism is a fail-
ure; only the "fat cats" prosper from this, as quality decreases due
to lack of competition, while prices rise.  Is there anyone who 
believes we can't beat Mexico in terms of quality?  Losing a few jobs
now may very well wake up the American people.
  Second, Quayle and his slip ups.  Did anyone notice that Clinton
and Gore _both_ butchered Bible quotes in their speeches at the Demo
Convention?  Religious leaders were upset, but how much press coverage
did it receive?  Nada.  Anyone care to guess what would have happened
if Quayle did the same thing?  The fact is, liberals who know Quayle's
past record, who know what Dan Quayle really is like, are _scared_ of
him; they have been since he was named.  Quayle isn't some bumbling
idiot; he's a very competent politician.  The liberal media looked so
hard for something to smear Quayle with (ex: making up the rumor that
he was picked solely on the basis of his looks, trying to mislead
people into believing he joined the National Guard just to get out of 
the war, etc.).  They failed.  It's always easier to laugh at someone
than intelligently and reasonably deal with the issues they espouse;
this is the approach the liberal media took.
   Third, no, Bush has not been the best of Presidents.  Yes, he has
made mistakes.  His biggest-"read my lips..."  I knew as soon as he
said it that Congress had him where they wanted him.  He was faced
with a choice: either break his tax promise or see programs he had
also promised go down the drain.  He let himself get put into a bad
position, and he paid for it.  And, more significantly, he didn't
shirk his responsibility in regard to the matter; he willingly took
the blame, something I don't ever remember another politician doing.
  That's my opinion - it ought to be yours.

                                       Fred
From: fay@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Dab and daughter
Date: 31 Aug 92 14:07:51 -0500
Summary: Dan, I mean, Dan
Keywords: abortion
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

I know this happened awhile back, but I'm new to the net.

The real question Larry King should have asked Dan (and co.) is this.

"Suppose you succeed in making abortion illegal.  Your daughter (etc) comes to
you and tells you she's pregnant.  She also tells you that she is poing to go
get a back-alley abortion, no matter what you say.

How do you feel about legal abortion now?"
From: michael@paul.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Phil Gramm
Date: 2 Sep 92 21:50:47 GMT
Organization: Boston University
In-reply-to: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu's message of 2 Sep 92 15:55:02 GMT

In article <1992Sep2.155502.8959@u.washington.edu> sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) writes:
[things deleted]

  =I had been thinking of other 1996 candidates who are photogenic
  =conservative barfers (bushers) like Newt Gingrich or the
  =irrepressible Jack Kemp.  Your warning about Gramm will be kept
  =in mind.

Let's not forget that there are others with their eye on the oval
office, such as:
the Rep.Gov. of Calif. Pete "Have an IOU, have two, they're small" Wilson
the Rep.Gov. of Mass.  Bill "I wanna be a cockroach" Weld
and others.

The trick is too see who's dangerous, who's stupid, and who can get
A job done, let alone THE job. This, of course, applies to the
Dems as well as the Reps.

ObJDQJoke:
How many Quayles does it take to change a light bulb?
None. That's what the servants are for.

Ciao,
Chaplin.


--
===========================================================================
Michael Chaplin                    Language is a virus from outer space.
michael@albert.bu.edu                     - William S. Burroughs

The Einstein Papers Project        The opinions contained herein reflect
Boston University                      neither those of the project, 
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.          nor those of Albert Einstein.
Organization: Information Networking Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 09:40:59 -0400 
From: "Joshua M. Sabloff" <jsa5+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Definitions
Distribution: alt.fan.dan-quayle

Excerpts from netnews.alt.fan.dan-quayle: 27-Aug-92 Re: Definitions by
Jared Dahl@rchland.vnet. 
> Let's see, it could be one of these three:
                                      ^^^^^
>     FASCISIM, REPUBLICANISM, PAT ROBERTSONISM, REAGANISM???

Excuse me, but do you write Danoe's speeches?

-Josh Sabloff (jsa5@andrew.cmu.edu)
"Now go away before I taunt you a second time-a!"
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: silverstein@vxdesy.desy.de
Subject: Re: Dan's Kid Conceived Before Marriage?
Organization: (DESY, Hamburg, Germany)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 11:02:11 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.143221.13618@news.nd.edu>, slarsen@schumann.helios.nd.edu (susan larsen) writes:
> In article <1992Aug25.205915.3530@beaver.cs.washington.edu> dbj@cs.washington.edu (Dave Johnson) writes:
>>In article <sysmatt.714729758@aix3090b.uky.edu> sysmatt@aix3090b.uky.edu (Matt Simpson) writes:
>>>zaccone@rigel.cs.bucknell.edu (Rick Zaccone) writes:
>>>
>>>>An article about Dan in last week's NYT mention that he and Marilyn
>>>>got married after dating just 10 weeks in 1974.  It also mentioned
>>>>that his oldest kid is 18 years old.  I'm wondering if this was a
>>>>shotgun wedding.  Does anyone know?  What are the dates of his wedding
>>>>and his oldest kids birth?
>>>
>>Don't forget what was posted here recently--someone said that
>>Marilyn chose to have labor induced during her pregnancly so
>>she could have the kid three weeks early so it wouldn't interfere
>>with her exam schedule.  So we already know she didn't have a
>>full 9-month term....
>>-- 
> 
> Hmmm, exam schedule?  Wouldn't that put the birth in April or May?
> You know, the fourth or fifth month of 1974?
> 
> Sue Larsen
> slarsen@berlin.helios.nd.edu

Unless these were the fall term exams, in December. Hmmm...someone has got to
find the dates for this. It could be interesting...

Sam Silverstein
From: popec@fennec.sccsi.com (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Bye Bye Dan
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 14:06:39 CST
Organization: Fennec Information Systems, The World View Magazine

Well, it looks like Bush 'n' Quayle's Convention Bounce has piddled away 
to nearly zilch, and I think the boys are going down the crapper.  The 
election is a little over two months away.  
  So what is going to happen to this thread when Dan is gone?  Who are we 
gonna laugh at?  Who is going to be the new Dan Quayle for the next 4 
years.  At least you have to admit, Dan was rock steady.  You could 
always count on him to raise mediocrity to new levels.  His grasp of the 
English language was almost as hilarious as Bush's.
  I suspect that he will end up in the family business as the Company 
Vice President in charge of shaking hands with those who want to shake 
hands with a real ex-vice president.  I don't suppose we ever see a book 
from him about his 4 years as V.P.  (Marylin might tho'.)
What'll we do?  Actually Dan was a bright spot in a decade of unmitigated 
ugliness.  An easy target that except for the Competetiveness Council was 
no real danger to the Country except in the fact that Bush might die in 
office.  Bye Bye Dan.  Maybe we'll have to start an ALT. Pat Robertson 
thread.  If Bush goes down, Pat and his group, the Christian Coalitian 
are going to redouble their efforts to take over the wounde Republican 
party.  I think there will be a great deal of merrriment at watching the 
Repuke-likan Party tear itself to bits over the next couple of years as 
the Far Right Religous Nuts Try to fill the Party laedership posts with 
Screaming Right Winged Geeks.  
And when Bush 'n' Danny go down to defeat, I think i am going to consider
throwing a big old "Thank Gawd They're Finally Out Of Here" party!
Bye Bye Danny! Bye Bye Bush!  Bye Bye Babs, the silver Bag!  Bye Bye 
Marylin!  Time for a party and to fumigate the Whitehouse!

----------------
William C. Barwell [popec@fennec.sccsi.com]  //  Pope Charles
Pope Of the Church Of The SubGenius for the Golden Triangle Area
Laughing at everything in the Universe...including the concept of 
laughing at everything in the Universe!
-----------------
From: llama@pooh.cc.utexas.edu (sine nomine)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: 2 Sep 92 23:42:15 GMT
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

Eber Lambert (elambert@qualcom.qualcomm.com) wrote:

: I just want to bush this little tidbit: I lived in Indianapolis for 3 years.
: Hoosier mentality made Deep South Mentality look like cultural elitism.

i know texas isn't deep south, but...

: The single most important thing in this state is the High School basketball 
: tournament.

substitute football, and it fits for texas.

: The universities (oddly there are several) are pockets of culture and
: enlightenment (with the possible exception of Purdue but only because
: of the sheer quantity of engineers) that one visits like one would visit a
: Zoo.

substitute "austin" for "universities" and it fits for texas. the
universities (at least in dallas) aren't pockets of anything but
yuppies, business majors, and engineers. oh, and spouse-hunters.
they're terribly conservative, with the exception of ut-austin. i
sometimes think that austin isn't really part of texas...

: This is also the state that sent Dan to the Senate. 

we have phil gramm. and we had clayton williams, who thankgod didn't
get elected to anything.

--
sine nomine
debbie martinson
"a thousand points of hypocrisy, we never wanted peace" -- the wake up
and smell the blood blues
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: The Dan Quayle Macro File
Date: 31 Aug 92 16:28:06 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Virginia


Here it is folks. Now YOU TOO can write dan the man speechs at home!!!
All you have to do is throw in an occasional incoherent embellishment...

Alt-1  Hollywood and the media elite
Alt-2  Family
Alt-3  Values
Alt-4  God
Alt-5  Beliefs
Alt-6  Character
Alt-7  Liberal
Alt-8  Liberal democratic congress
Alt-9  Reform agenda
Alt-0  Heartland


go to it!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: AH.PBL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Mark)
Subject: Re: Quayle gets it wrong again
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 18:03:10 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.055446.24957@ccu.umanitoba.ca>,
ejohnso@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Eric Johnson) writes:
>In <168548F36.DSTEPHEN@cmsa.gmr.com> DSTEPHEN@cmsa.gmr.com writes:
>
>>While I'm at it, I also think (a) sending harassing E-mail to Tucker Quayle is
>>just fine (e.g. "How did your sister's abortion go?")
>
>Seriously, they take this sort of stuff with a very straight face. Besides,
>the kid's not responsible for the sins of his father, and there's no need
>to fall to the level of the 'Lambs of God' who harrass the children of doctors
>who perform D&Cs.                     ^^^

  That's "Lambs of Christ", I believe.  What a clever name.  I
  always wanted to be a small, furry creature with a brain that's
  the size of a peanut.  Sort of an improvement for Mr. Potatoe
  Head.

  Leave Tucker-baby alone: he's soooooo cute!  (In a Hitler Youth
  kind-of-way.)

  -- Mark

Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:3197 alt.politics.bush:3609 alt.politics.clinton:3607
From: michael@paul.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: "I can even forgive Bush for Dan Quayle, but not for this."
Date: 31 Aug 92 20:29:38 GMT
	<hyhnc!h@lynx.unm.edu>
Followup-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Organization: Boston University
In-reply-to: jennyb@triton.unm.edu's message of 31 Aug 92 18:32:27 GMT

In article <hyhnc!h@lynx.unm.edu> jennyb@triton.unm.edu (Jenny Ballmann) writes:

  =When the hurricane was almost at Bermuda, and the Weather Channel
  =announced it was a Category IV with expected top wind speeds ~150mph,
  =I turned to my husband and said "Bush is a fool if he doesn't get the
  =army down there now".  I'm no expert, but I expect my leaders to assess
  =potential emergencies at least as competently as I.  His only possible
  =excuse is that sending in troops with supplies was logistically
  =impossible, and he's not using it.  

Well, you see, Florida just isn't oil country now, is it?
One wonders how Texas might have fared. (only 1/2 smile)

Or perhaps the number of electoral votes might have something to do
with it. Except for the fact that Florida is, electorally speaking,
good sized (although Texas is larger).

The question is, what was this doing in alt.fan.dan-quayle ?
Surely Danoe didn't brogue *this*?

[brogue- n.(fr.Old Irish for shoe) 1. an accent (from having a "foot in
one's mouth) 2.shoe (more at brogan) 3. to quayle (again, "foot in
mouth")]

Inquisitively yours,
Chaplin.




--
===========================================================================
Michael Chaplin                    Language is a virus from outer space.
michael@albert.bu.edu                     - William S. Burroughs

The Einstein Papers Project        The opinions contained herein reflect
Boston University                      neither those of the project, 
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.          nor those of Albert Einstein.
From: kannan@ardor.enet.dec.com (Nari Kannan)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Dan Quixote won the Shadow Boxing bout....or atleast he thinks so!!!
Date: 1 Sep 92 17:01:46 GMT
Reply-To: kannan@ardor.enet.dec.com (Nari Kannan)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation

The Danster's latest bout with Murphy Brown proves that he's probably 
the only leader (semi-leader if you prefer!) in the world who is
happy that he's won a bout with a fictional character.

Also some political trivia---

How did GHWB become a millionaire?

He started with three million. :-)

Nari
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jc@optimla.aimla.com (John VanHoozer)
Subject: DQ and Space Exploration Policy 
Keywords: NASA,  Space,  Dough Head Quayle
Reply-To: jc@optimla.aimla.com (John VanHoozer)
Organization: OptImage Interactive Services Co., L.P.
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 14:53:55 GMT


Hello folks,

Read a post today that used a DQ quote to refute some Dough Head's
claim that DQ and Bush were not as bad as all us "Liberal" 
Republ-o-bashers make them out to be.  The Quote concerned DQ's
grasp of the heavens and his position as chairman of the National
Space Advisory Council.  I had run across this quote once before:

	Mars is essentially in the same orbit...somewhat the same distance
	from the Sun, which is very important.  We have seen pictures where
	there are canals, we believe, and water.

To the meat of the matter...

Early in the administration,  DQ was supposed to prepare a detailed
plan outlining the USA's space exploration goals and NASA's future.
I vividly recall a local newscaster saying (quoting as best I can):

	"The scientific community was stunned by Vice-president 
	 Qualye's report.  The VP's 2 page outlined showed no thought,
	 research, or preparation was given to the subject.  The
	 panel was stunned that the NASA plans for space exploration
	 could be summed up in _2_ pages of type written notes."

Does anyone know the report I am writing about?  A citation or any
other info would be helpful.  I'll try to get to the library this 
weekend and see if I can find it but any extra info would move my search
along faster.

				jc



-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
John C. VanHoozer			     |
OptImage Interactive Services Company, L.P.  |  uunet!{optimage,aimla}!jc
11040 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite #300	     |  Fax:  (310)445-5720
Los Angeles, Ca. 90025			     |  Phone:(310) 445-5721
___________________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer:
   Opinions,  yew doone neeed my steenkeeng Opinions.

Carpe Diem:  A carp a day, that's all we ask.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: ellis@nova.gmi.edu (Stew Ellis)
Subject: Re: Quayletool
Organization: GMI Engineering&Management Institute, Flint, MI
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 19:45:01 GMT

cornell@inoc.dl.nec.com (Cornell Kinderknecht) writes:

>cornell@inoc.dl.nec.com (Cornell Kinderknecht) writes:


>>Now, has anyone gotten this to compile?  I attempted and I get :

>OK.  Here I am answering my own posting.  To get this to compile,
>I changed config.h by specifying the full path instead of using
>FILE_PATH variable.
>	#define AUTHOR_FILE <specify full path here>
>	#define QUOTE_FILE <specify full path here>
>	#define HELP_FILE <specify full path here>
>	
>Also in graphics.c, the compiler complained about "const" being undefined
>in line 119.  So, I just removed "const" from the typecast:
>	(char *) quayle_bits

>--- cjk

I had already done all this, but still find Danny-boy will not "speak".

I get the picture, but I just get the list of contributors in the window
under jdq.  The buttons for prev and next are inactive (faint dashed lines).

Does anyone actually have this running on SunOS 4.1.2, bundled cc, OW3?

--
--                                                        ___________________
  R.Stewart(Stew) Ellis, Assoc.Prof., (Off)313-762-9765  /   _____  ______ 
  Humanities & Social Science,  GMI Eng.& Mgmt. Inst.   /        / /  /  / /
  Flint, MI 48504      ellis@nova.gmi.edu              /________/ /  /  / /
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Subject: Re: Dan's a Democrat (sorry, wrong key)
Originator: pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 22:02:41 GMT

In article <w1fncma.jeffgus@netcom.com> jeffgus@netcom.com (Jeffrey Gustafson) writes:
>unrzc7@daphne.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (THOMAS LUBANSKI) writes:
>
>>Seriously, even though I'm a bit away from the US, the mere thought of Bush/
>>Quayl rerunning for the next four years makes my stomach turn. So please 
>>vote. VOTE!!!! And do it for Clinton/Gore. I really don't know these two 
>>guys, but there's no way that they are worse than Bush/Quayl.
>
>	What I can't understand is how Dan Quayle is all of the sudden
>an idiot.  He has been in politics for years before he became Vice
>President.  Is it just because he isn't "Politically Correct"?
>
>				...Jeff
>				jeffgus@netcom.com
>
>

Dan Quayle didn't just all of a sudden become an idiot. He always has been.
It's just that before four years ago, nobody outside of Indiana knew or
cared if he was an idiot or not.

For all we know, you could be an idiot too. But we don't care because you
are not the VP. The only thing we have to judge you by is your post.....
Ooops, I stand corrected.

Patrick Pape
pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu



Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Subject: Re: Audience cards? 
Reply-To: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 15:07:51 GMT

In article <1992Aug25.233423.19737@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu
(Bradley S. Corsello) writes:
> Yeah, I saw those fine young Arians during the convention coverage.  They
> looked like Hitler youth, with their heads thrown back and sputum spewing
> out of their mouths as they led the frantic crowd in shrill chanting of
> unbelievably clever slogans like "FOUR MORE YEARS" and "WHERE WAS BILL?"
> (Where was Bill when?  I dunno.)

   Um, I think they are referring to Clinton's failure to go to Vietnam.  He
had a high number in the draft lottery and wasn't picked.  Clear evidence
of moral cowardice.

   Also I think having those blokes down front was a great idea.  Male
cheerleaders at the Republican convention are a small but significant step in
woman's march toward equality.  I wonder if they recieved 40% higher wages than
female cheerleaders?  If not, I suspect that the Republicans have betrayed
their familly values.
 
Dan
Danwell@IASTATE.EDU
"Holy priceless collection of Etruscan snoods, Batman"
-Robin
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: wolf@leland.Stanford.EDU (Andy Wolfsberg)
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 02:36:41 GMT

Didja ever log on when you were in a pissy mood and just get ticked off beyond 
belief by something stupid that probably wouldn't seem so bad if you weren't
already feeling pissy???   I guess it's kinda like "you shouldn't get in a car
and roar off after having a heated arguement with someone."

So that's my excuse, but still

In article <1992Aug31.231915.25213@athena.cs.uga.edu> stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton) writes:

>dot dot dot

>>anthony (not an american, and glad)
>catherine (wishing she lived wherever anthony does)
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Good, get the hell out of our country twit. We don't want ya anyway. But don't
moan like that.  For crying out loud, are you forced to go to school in GA? 
I hardly believe it.  Go somewhere else in the country and you'll find
change from DEEP SOUTH mentality.  Move to another country and you'll be whining
for the consumer environment you've got RIGHT HERE in the USA.
Heck, I despise George and the DANglement as much as the rest of you but this 
kinda whining makes me wanna barf.

Now that I've got that off my chest (fingertips?), I'll go eat a piece of candy and hope I 
feel better.

Andy (I feel the heat already  -- and by the way, did I miss the point. Like, is Anthony
                                   a major stud and this is love talking, not whining) 

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle