HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mmaxwell@ucsd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Near Dark *spoiler* (was re: Fright Night, was re: Dracula)
Date: 21 Aug 92 15:15:15 GMT
Organization: UC San Diego
NNTP-Posting-Host: irpsws80.ucsd.edu

In article <ed.714366487@cwis> ed@cwis.unomaha.edu (Ed Stastny) writes:
>mmaxwell@ucsd.edu writes:
>>"Fright Night" was surprisingly good, for one example.  Another vampire
>>flick, "After Dark" was a well-done movie, stylish, darkly humorous, even if
>>the
>>ending is a complete deus-ex-machina happy ending.  (Oh, we'll just change
>>out the evil vampire blood and put in good human blood and you'll be cured,
>>live happily ever after).  Faithful to vampire legends?  No.  Good movie
(minus
>>the ending)?  Yes.
>
>Isn't that "Near Dark"?  I agree, it's a great movie.  I didn't mind the
>ending THAT much.  I thought the "changing blood" thing was too simple.
>
>Some trivia: Near Dark directed by James Cameron's wife.
> 
>....e
>--
>Ed Stastny           *  SOUND News and Arts magazine available now via
>ed@cwis.unomaha.edu  *  anon. FTP: quartz.rutgers.edu (/pub/journals)
>                     *  or email from me here at cwis.  Soon to return 
>(Imagery is reality) *  to the GOPHER server.  Art and writing welcome.
>
Of course you are correct.  I must have gotten my brain stuck reading
the posts on "After Dark" before i scribbled out my reply.  It is 
indeed "Near Dark" and i indeed am a bonehead (or at least very tired.)
-------------------
Matt Maxwell
mmaxwell@ucsd.edu

"He took personality tests
 and stapled them to his lower lip" -- Stan Ridgway
From: cn@otter.hpl.hp.com (Colin Needham)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Re: REBECCA (spoiler)
Date: 14 Aug 92 18:27:22 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.

In article <wood.713708552@jfred>, wood@siemens.com. (Jim Wood) writes
>I saw this BBC version, played on PBS television here circa 1980.  I
>too would love to see this again.  At least they adhered to the original
>story of the book in this version.  The 1940 movie changed one very basic
>fact of the story (SPOILER AHEAD).

>In the book and BBC production, Maxim de Winter shoots his first wife,
>Rebecca.  In the 1940 production, he merely strikes her in anger, she
>falls down onto some hardware equipment, and dies.

This was beyond the control of both Hitchcock and Selznick: the
production code in force at the time did not permit characters to
commit murder and get away unpunished. This would have been the
case had Maxim shot her in the movie and so it had to be changed.

Hitchcock clashed a number of times with the censors throughout his
time in Hollywood. The censor was unhappy with the hints of 
homosexuality in Martin Landau's character in "North by Northwest"
(most of which remain in the final version anyway) - they insisted 
that the word "sweetie" was dropped from one of his lines! For an
interesting account of how Hitch manipulated the censors for
"Psycho" I recommend Stephen Rebello's book, "Alfred Hitchcock and
the making of Psycho".

Cheers,

Col

-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Now you listen to me, I'm an advertising man not a red herring"
  -- Cary Grant, North by Northwest
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Col Needham                |  Phone: +44 272 799910 x 28704
HP Labs                    |  cn@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Bristol                    |  cn@hplabs.hpl.hp.com
U.K.                       |  100022.1126@compuserve.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: cooper@cos.com (Gary Cooper)
Subject: Re: Best War Movies?
Organization: Corporation for Open Systems
Distribution: usa  
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 02:16:24 GMT

In <1992Aug8.165414.12652@phillip.edu.au> t9014201@phillip.edu.au writes:

>In article <1992Aug7.231003.4704@cs.brown.edu>, ST402420@brownvm.brown.edu writes:
>>>7.  _Zulu_ - Michael Caine's first, one of his best.
>-- 
>I considered adding this one to the Best Musical List that was here recently.
>African Chants vs Welsh Choirs.....
>An amazing movie just to listen to.

Agreeeeeed - wholeheartedly!  If you don't have a laserdisc player, run, don't
walk, out and buy one and pick up the Criterion widescreen (natch!) LD 
version of it!  Beautiful picture, digital sound! (i think :>) 

"612 Williams, sir, we were gonna practice this afternoon for the company
quoir.  But you've got my only solo tenor working out there in the cold
water"
"well, I hope he sings better than he works"
"Oh, indeed sir, he does!"

classic!

so long net.land! 
"
-- 
Gary Cooper (not the dead one)
	Don't bother flaming or writing, I just quit my job and will only
be here for another day or two.  Sure - what the hell - I speak for the
corporation for open systems - sue me!
From: rod@cats.ucsc.edu (Rodrick Su)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: The Killer on Cinemax
Date: 13 Aug 92 00:53:24 GMT
Organization: Tigana Restoration Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: am.ucsc.edu


In article <17350019@hp-ptp.ptp.hp.com> eric@hp-ptp.ptp.hp.com (Eric Tend) writes:
>Any John Woo fans might want to take note that his super-charged, ultra-
>violent gangster epic "The Killer" is on Cinemax this month.
>

	A unconfirm rumor has it that American remake is in the work
with Richard Gere in the role of Jeffery, the killer.  
	
	Woo was purposed offered the job as the director, but he decline
stating that he would like to work on other project financed by Americans.
	
-- 
[ Rodrick Su           ]-----------------------------------------------------] 
[----------------------[ A bomb lives only as it is falling.		     ] 
[ rod@cats.ucsc.edu    ]------------------------[ ``Use of Weapons''         ] 
[ rod@ucscb.ucsc.edu   ]------------------------[   Iain M. Banks            ]
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis)
Subject: Re: Woody Allen / Mia Farrow
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 19:17:04 GMT
Organization: The Fighting Thundercats

Ethan Montag writes:
>
>Allen is in a no win situation when it comes to custody:  If he argues
>that he was an involved father to the children (as his lawyers did on
>the Today show this morning) who wakes up early to get them ready for
>school, spends as much time as he can with them, etc., then his affair
>with Sun-Yi is morally suspicious because he's been a "family member"
>for quite a while.  If however, his involvement with the children was 
>nominal, then why the heck should he get custody.  
>
>In my opinion, the whole thing is pretty disgraceful no matter what the
>other facts in the case may be.  

People are constructing a straw dog here. There's obviously no
biological incest here. There's no indication of coercion. There's
no indication that the Previn woman didn't know what she was doing.
There's no indication that she thought of Allen as a substitute for
her adoptive father. Such handwringing! 

As for Allen's side on the issue of custody it is possible that
he views Mia Farrow's frequent trips to the adoption agencies
as a neurotic condition rather than as a noble sacrifice or an
act of love. [I know neither of them, obviously, nor do most of
the posters on this issue. I'm simply showing that there can
very easily be two sides to this issue.] If the child abuse charge
is simply an act of Farrow's anger then I don't think  the
custody case should be judged peremptorily.
-- 
Jeff Davis <davis@keats.ca.uky.edu> Write when you get the chance.
From: hseung@anat3d1.anatomy.upenn.edu (Hyunsuk Seung)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: REVIEW: DELICATESSEN
Keywords: author=K.Johnson
Date: 19 Aug 92 05:13:10 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Aug18.133541.27959@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu (Brian L. Johnson) writes:
> ...
>      The scenery was bleak, yet interesting.  The world that was created
> is MAD-MAX-like, which could be expected because they are both post-
> apocalypse.  I found myself wondering though, what was beyond the
> delicatessen, or if it was all wasteland.  The one part of the film that
> I found rather hard to accept was how bad the technology was.  None of
> the items used by anybody was new.  It was, I would estimate, pre-50's.
> Is the film implying that all of the new technology will be wiped out
> with the nuclear war?

At least they have remote controls for the black & white TV sets.  The
movie reminded me more of an alternate present (or a mix between 40's
and post-apocalypse).  The directors themselves called it the
"anterior future."

P.s. You can take a peek at Britain by watching _Brazil_ ;-).

Hyunsuk Seung
hseung@anat3d1.anatomy.upenn.edu
From: mjb@gserv1.dl.ac.uk (M.J.T. Bell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: THEY LIVE and/or ALIEN3
Date: 17 Aug 92 12:29:23 GMT
Reply-To: mjb@gserv1.dl.ac.uk
Organization: Daresbury Laboratory, UK

Thanks to all the people who replied to my query regarding THEY LIVE.
It is indeed a John Carpenter film and a much enjoyed one judging from
the contents of the replies.

My next question goes out to anyone who has seen ALIEN3. It is released 
this friday, 21st August, here in the UK. Being a big ALIEN/ALIENS fan
I'll be seeing it on its opening night.
Will I be disappointed ???
marks out of 10 ???

Thanks 
                                                         ______
                                        Later ...       /\__  _\
                                                       /  \_\ \ \
                                                      /  \ \___\_\
                                                      \ \ \/ __ //
                                                       \ \/ ___ /
                                                        \/_____/
      +-------------------------------+
     / The names Bell..  Mark Bell ! / \
    / but my friends just call me   /   +-----------------------------------+
   / m.bell@uk.ac.daresbury.gserv1 /   /           In NET space            /
  +-------------------------------+   /  no-one can hear you scream !!!   /
 /                                 \ /                                   /
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
                                     \                                 /
                                      +-------------------------------+
From: ssyun@lab3.ma.utexas.edu (SungSik Yun)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Basic Instinct-not about ending
Keywords: name of car
Date: 13 Aug 92 15:56:21 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: University of Texas at Austin Mathematics

Is there anybody who can tell me the name of the car which SS have?
Thanks.

-- 

SungSik Yun---UT austin:Mathematics ||| E-mail:ssyun@math.utexas.edu
ph:(512)471-7711 ext220(office)     |||        ssyun@cs.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: hempling@quorum.com (David B. Hempling)
Subject: Re: Jurassic Park casting
Originator: hempling@parker
Organization: Quorum Software Systems, Inc.
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 00:44:47 GMT

dprice@convex.com (David Price) writes:

>I just read that Sir Richard Attenborough has been cast as John
>Hammond, the businessman who builds Jurassic Park, in Steven
>Spielberg's movie.  Has anyone heard about who else has been cast in
>the movie?

He's the fellow touring right now with Richard III, right? He
was just on Leno. 

He strikes me more the type for the mathematician role, wouldn't you
say?

dave
hempling@quorum.com	"Friends don't let friends vote Republican!"
From: aldis@kralizec.zeta.org.au (Aldis Ozols)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Best War Movies?
Date: 13 Aug 92 03:29:42 GMT
Organization: Kralizec Dialup Unix Sydney: +61-2-837-1183 V.32


The Longest Day - A greatdt  B&W movie of the D-day invasion of Normandy.
                  Contains an unforgettable pan shot following the 
                  troops across the beach.

greatdt
    ^^^
    I hate vi!
From: gopher@yar.cs.wisc.edu (Chris Bovitz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: What do you call YOUR remote?
Date: 14 Aug 92 05:08:46 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison -- Computer Sciences Dept.

In article <1992Aug14.030448.24199@cbfsb.cb.att.com> colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten) writes:
>In article <8059@dirac.physics.purdue.edu>, ns@bohr.physics.purdue.edu (Nancy M. Schnepp) writes:
>> The TV Guide has an article this week about "zapping".
>> In other words, channel scanning. 
>> At our house we call our remote "the clicker".  Hand
>> me "the clicker" is lots quicker than saying, "hand
>> me the remote control", don't you think??   Hah!
>> 
>>   
>
>Mostly we call it the "thing" accompanied by appropriate hand
>gesture - hand out as if holding it and pressing the buttons.
>

I just call it "the remote".


-- 
Chris Bovitz              |    "I demand that you shoot me now!"
Department of Meteorology |    
Univ of Wisc - Madison    |       -- Daffy Duck
moonunit@meteor.wisc.edu  |    
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rehak@breeze.rap.ucar.edu (Nancy Rehak)
Subject: Re: REBECCA
Organization: NCAR / RAP
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 20:35:39 GMT

In article <23610@oasys.dt.navy.mil> dlee@oasys.dt.navy.mil (David Lee) writes:
>In rec.arts.movies, colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten) writes:
>>In article <15131@suns4.crosfield.co.uk>, pdg@crosfield.co.uk (paul goffin) wri
>>tes:
>.> In article <161fdiINN9da@agate.berkeley.edu> samlee@ocf.berkeley.edu (Sam Lee
>.) writes:
>.> [stuff about REBECCA being a good film deleted]
>
>.> Yes, it was a good film wasn't it?
>
>.> Thing is I can't remember who played the title role:-)
                                             ^^^^^
>
>.> Ideas anyone?    (  :-) :-) )
>
>
>>I always suspected that it was really Vivien Leigh.  I mean, back
>>there in the back of everyone's brain - especially Olivier's.
>
>
>"Rebecca" won an Oscar for best picture.. Joan Fontaine was the lead actress.
                                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yes, Joan Fontaine was the lead actress in Rebecca.  However, she did not play
the title role - Rebecca.  Rebecca was the first Mrs. de Winter.  Joan Fontaine
played the second Mrs. de Winter.  The question was sarcastic :-) :-) :-) as
Rebecca is dead before the movie starts and never appears in the movie.

Nancy Rehak
From: tj06+@andrew.cmu.edu (Thomas J. Joyce)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Elvis movies on this past weekend
Date: 17 Aug 92 12:32:56 GMT
Organization: Administrative Systems, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Did anyone catch any of the Elvis movies on this past weekend? (Or should
I rephrase that: How could you miss them while cable surfing?)

Was it TBS or TNT that ran a slew of them? So if you're wondering why
your co-workers are singing the opening bars to "Viva Las Vegas" this
morning you'll know why.

tom
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: tomp@acpy01.att.com (Tom Purcia (CXNIXPT1))
Subject: Re: Movies starring Claude Rains Wanted.
Organization: AT&T IMS - Piscataway, NJ (USA)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 13:18:27 GMT

In article <1992Aug14.004130.42718@watson.ibm.com> yozzo@watson.ibm.com (Ralph Yozzo) writes:
>
>One of my favorite actor is Claude Rains and I'd like to see if there is
>any movies that he was in that I missed.
> 
>I've seen him in 
>  "Caesar and Cleopatra"
>  "Casablanca"
>  "Robin Hood" 
>  "The Phantom of the Opera"
>  "The Invisible Man"
>
> Did I miss any?
>
   How about the following.....
   "Notorious" one of my favorite movies 
   "Now Voyger" with Betty Davis...               

Tom Purcia

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com (The Man from Another Place)
Subject: Re: American titles of foreign films (was: Manon of the Spring )
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 15:52:47 GMT

In article <2665@nlsun1.oracle.nl>, gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley) writes...

} Okay, forgive my total ignorance of the German language, but I have
} seen written somewhere that the German title of this film translates as
} "Angels Over Berlin" (truly uninspired) - could this be so??

No. As Markus said, "Himmel" means either "sky" or "Heaven".

-- 

	"She's my radiation baby.
	 She's my teenage fallout girl."

--- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC, "The Mill", Maynard, MA)

    boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten)
Subject: Re: REBECCA
Summary: Eashy one - or is it? :-)
Organization: AT&T
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 03:02:02 GMT

In article <5892@taurus.cs.nps.navy.mil>, jxxl@taurus.cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke) writes:
> rehak@breeze.rap.ucar.edu (Nancy Rehak) writes:
> 
> # Yes, Joan Fontaine was the lead actress in Rebecca.  However, she did not play
> # the title role - Rebecca. Rebecca was the first Mrs. de Winter.  Joan Fontaine
> # played the second Mrs. de Winter.
> 
> Yes, but what is the name of the character Joan Fontaine plays? Another
> trick question?
> 
> John

The easy answer is "Mrs. DeWinter", but that's not the point.  They
never say what her name is or was - and the closest the book comes to
it is "I", as in "Last night I dreamed I went to Manderlay again."

marc colten

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: Attenborough's "Charlie"
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 92 15:58:27 GMT

In article <1992Aug17.150027.1@gallua.gallaudet.edu> rlwilliams@gallua.gallaudet.edu writes:
>In article <cosulliv.714062087@sfu.ca>, cosulliv@fraser.sfu.ca (Christina Marie O'Sullivan) writes:
>> Has anyone out there seen trailers for the Chaplin biopic due out in
>> December? Does the film seem destined for box-office smashdom or
>> flopdom? 
>
>Have ANY of these film bio's of Film stars been successful, other than 
>Yankee Doodle Dandy?  

"The Al Jolson Story" and "Jolson Sings Again" were both extremely
successful.  I believe "The Man of a Thousand Faces" (Lon Chaney
biopic with Cagney in the lead) was also successful.

That stacks up against "W.C. Fields and Me", two different films called
"Harlow", "The Buster Keaton Story", "Valentino", the Clark Gable film
with James Brolin, and a number of forgettable TV movies.

On the whole, I'd say movie biographies of film stars are not especially
good bets, but they're not necessarily sure losers, either.

--
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu
From: bsercomb@neumann.une.edu.au (Shadow.,,,)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: incredible
Date: 14 Aug 92 02:09:13 GMT
Reply-To: bsercomb@neumann.une.edu.au
Originator: bsercomb@neumann.une.edu.au

From article <1992Aug11.133249.1164@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, by mjs4@po.CWRU.Edu (M. J. Sanz):
> 
> i leave the country for a year and when i come back there are still
> Terminator 2 threads being posted!
> Don't get me wrong - i loved the movie - i just find it amusing that
> you're still posting so many articles about the movie.

The problem is that the threads of late have been pathetic. The moral views
of a terminator..... jezus, havn't we got anything better to do out there?
From: mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: American titles of foreign films (was: Manon of the Spring )
Date: 14 Aug 92 12:31:04 GMT
Organization: DB and ES Subdivision, TU Vienna

From article <1992Aug13.200142.27450@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>, by dsc@gemini.tmc.edu (Doug S. Caprette Bldg. 28 W191 x3892):
> In article <1992Aug13.155436.18306@engage.pko.dec.com> boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com (The Man from Another Place) writes:
>>No. As Markus said, "Himmel" means either "sky" or "Heaven".

> Gee, sort of like English where "the heavens" means "sky."

Gee, no, it's exactly the other way round.  Himmel is a homonym, while
"the heavens" and "sky" are synonyms.

(I tried to mail this, but the mail bounced; our nameserver is a wreck.)
-- 
Markus Stumptner                                mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
University of Technology Vienna                 vexpert!mst@relay.eu.net
Paniglg. 16, A-1040 Vienna, Austria             ...mcsun!vexpert!mst
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: ummorea0@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Gene Moreau)
Subject: Re: RAISING CAIN
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 16:30:16 GMT

In <1992Aug14.190954.17099@sco.COM> maureenw@sco.COM (Maureen Wilkes) writes:

>In article <1992Aug11.155133.14399@ccu.umanitoba.ca> ummorea0@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Gene Moreau) writes:
>>
>>All I can really say about this movies is:  P.U., what a stinker.
>>Don't waster your money.
>>

>Could you elaborate, please?

Well I could I guess.  It was just plain bad.  It was confusing, I, along
with the 5 other people I went with, couldn't figure out the plot till there
was about 10 mins left.  I will have to admit that acting was pretty good
though. Let's see, I really liked(note the sarcasm here) the dream
sequence with in a dream sequence with in a dream sequence.  Not very
confusing at all.  It's almost impossible to find words to describe it,
except PU of course. Is this enough elaboration?  


-- 
Gene Moreau                |"But he is a lawyer, the bottom feeders of human
University of Manitoba     | kindness."
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada |  - Scott Taylor, Sports writer for the Winnipeg
ummorea0@ccu.umanitoba.ca  |    Free Press.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.tv
From: lis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Elisabeth Riba)
Subject: Re: Freshman Smarm
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 11:05:45 GMT

shippert@cco.caltech.edu (Tim Shippert) writes:

>	Do you suppose that if we could put together everybody on the net
>who saw a "flip"'s worth of this show we'd have somebody who actually
>watched the whole thing?

Do you one better--I watched the whole thing.  [For some reason, I
thought Drew Barrymore was supposed to be in this one.]  I remember
none of the character names, but should be able to answer plot
questions.  

-- 
--------------->Elisabeth Anne Riba * lis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu<---------------
"I want to be Robin to Bush's Batman."  Dan Quayle
Quick!  Notify DC.  I think it's time for another 900 number poll.
"We are enjoying a sluggish economy & not enjoying it very much."  --Bush
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jfrawley@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Judy Frawley)
Subject: Re: What do you call YOUR remote?
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 12:05:00 EDT

In article <8059@dirac.physics.purdue.edu> ns@bohr.physics.purdue.edu (Nancy M. Schnepp) writes:
>The TV Guide has an article this week about "zapping".
>In other words, channel scanning. 
>At our house we call our remote "the clicker".  Hand
>me "the clicker" is lots quicker than saying, "hand
>me the remote control", don't you think??   Hah!
>
>  
At our house, we call it the "Meemote" since that is how my
then 2.5 year old said it, and it has stuck.  

:-)
Judy Frawley
From: margaret@cs.arizona.edu (Margaret Newman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: *GREAT MOVIE ACTORS*
Summary: me again
Keywords: male only (hunks vs. babes)
Date: 14 Aug 92 19:10:06 GMT
Distribution: usa

> >Armand Assante
> >Kurt Russell
> >Kevin Costner
> >Sean Connery
> >Paul Newman
> >Peter Strauss
> >Alec Baldwin
> 
> >I could go on and on, but this should do for a start.  Any other women
> >out there who would like to add to the list?
> 
> >Kris
> >kris@fs2.assist.uci.edu

How could I forget good 'ol Uncle Paul?

I have to add even a few more (see how bored I am?):

Christian Slater
Christopher Reeves (Somewhere in Time)
Jon-Erik Hexum
Dirk Benedict
John J. York (the Jon-Erik lookalike)
The guy that used to play Jimmy Lee on General Hospital -Steve Bond?

Okay, I'm not adding anymore!  Let's see some other input.  If guys
can go on about babes, we can go on about hunks.  Okay, don't flame
me.  I say this all in good humor.

margaret
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: tedk@jpl.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Ted Ko)
Subject: Two questions
Organization: Bellcore
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 14:29:59 GMT

Related to the Movie Babes thread:

Who played Bruce Willis' wife in the Last Boy Scout?

Has anyone heard of anything Shari Shattuck has done?  I saw her in this
dumb movie called The Arena.

I couldn't find either of these actresses in the actress list....

-- 
Ted "Theodore" Ko  			E-Mail: ted@athena.mit.edu
						tedk@ctt.bellcore.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.horror