HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jeffj@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (jeffrey.n.jones)
Subject: Re: QST, in my opinion...
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:42:53 GMT

>In article <l8lijvINN5lp@west.west.sun.com> flloyd@L1-A.West.Sun.COM (Fred Lloyd [Phoenix SE]) writes:
>|
>|QST has, shall we say, a _special_ requirement for all advertisers.
>|QST, unlike all other amateur radio related publications, requires that
>|advertisers be willing to submit samples of their product to ARRL for
>|evaluation as to fitness for service.  In other words, a company
>|selling "Antenna Wax" is not likely to get advertising space.  Is this
>|good?  Well, yes and no.  For one thing, the ARRL is suppressing free
>|trade, freedom of the press and free speech by denying these
>|advertisers.  Secondly, I resent having the ARRL act as my benevolent
>|protector in shielding me from snake oil vendors.  I'd like to see all
>|of the products on the market, not just the ones which have been proven
>|"safe and effective" by independent juries.  I'm wise enough to spot
>|incredible claims, and there is federal recourse in the event that
>|mail order vendors become fraudulent.  Thank you, ARRL, but please allow
>|me to make value judgements for myself.

Glad you brought this up. I know now that I'll take product's claims a
little more seriously in QST. Hadn't realized that they required products
to perform as advertised. Now there's a new concept! Should be a policy in
all magazines! 

>|ARRL is suppressing free
>|trade, freedom of the press and free speech by denying these
>|advertisers.

Don't see how. The scam artists are free to print all the brochures 
and magazines they want. Can see it now, "Shady Claims Monthly"
Can't wait to suscribe! 8-)

Jeff

-- 
 Jeff Jones  AB6MB         |      If we do not succeed,
 jeffj@seeker.mystic.com   |      then we run the risk of failure.
 Infolinc BBS 415-778-5929 |      Vice Pres. Dan Quayle
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: rossi@gvlf9-q.gvl.unisys.com (Pete Rossi)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: questions about G5RV antenna
Date: 14 Aug 92 21:18:02 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Paramax Systems Corp (A Unisys Company), Great Valley Labs, PA

In article <1992Aug14.194514.9787@javelin.sim.es.com> datwyler@javelin.sim.es.com writes:
>My 1/2 G5RV does not have a balun. Read the "Antenna Compendium, Volume 1" by
>the ARRL. It includes an article about the antenna by Louis Varney, G5RV. This
>may be of help to you.

WHY DOES EVERYONE keep saying  "my G5RV does not have a balun" ???????

He bought this G5RV and it came with a balun -- connected between the
300 ohm twin lead and the coax.  

Are there different "flavors" of G5RV antennas? 

... and I kept telling him "put up a dipole" :-)

=================================================================
Pete Rossi - WA3NNA                  rossi@gvl.unisys.com

Paramax Systems Corporation - a Unisys Company
Electronic Systems - Valley Forge Labs - Paoli, Pennsylvania
=================================================================
From: vail@tegra.COM (Johnathan Vail)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Dualband HT recommendations?
Date: 14 Aug 92 14:04:00 GMT
Organization: Tegra, Inc., Billerica, MA
In-reply-to: rrgd50@email.sps.mot.com's message of 13 Aug 92 19:33:56 GMT


In article <1992Aug13.193356.27570@newsgate.sps.mot.com> rrgd50@email.sps.mot.com (chris terwilliger) writes:
   In article <1992Aug12.023405.21377@wam.umd.edu>, fireman@wam.umd.edu (Aaron Joseph Peterson) writes:
   > 
   > I hear all of this talk about Icom's W2A being so fragile.
   > I dropped mine while getting out of a Kenworth Tractor (Semi) and the W2A
   > fell about 10 feet down onto pavement.  Not a scratch. Works fine.
   > 
   > Oh yeah, BTW, I ALWAYS carry my HT in a case. Practice safe hamming.
   > WRAP that WRASCAL.

   I too dropped my W2A, from about 3 feet...works fine, but scratched the front
   of the case and cracked the battery rail.  Which brings up another point. How
   come every form of consumer electronic portable device comes with a carrying
   case EXCEPT HT's???  If my W2A had come with one or my local HRO hadn't been
   out of stock, my drop test wouldn't have resulted in near as much damage...

because then they couldn'e sell them as options or sell more batteries
due to broken rails.

seriously, one problem is that different people prefer different size
batteries.  thats why the sell severl different sizes.  I just wish
they sold one like they did for the IC-24.  That was a nice case.

I ended up getting one of the neoprene ones with the velcro strap.
simple and effective and not "plasticy" like the Icom ones.

jv


The inability of snakes to count is actually a refusal, on their part,
    to appreciate the Cardinal Number system. -- "Actual Facts"
 _____
|     | Johnathan Vail     vail@tegra.com     (508) 663-7435
|Tegra| jv@n1dxg.ampr.org    N1DXG@448.625-(WorldNet)
 -----  MEMBER: League for Programming Freedom (league@prep.ai.mit.edu)
From: pbrown@uwovax.uwo.ca
Subject: PERSEID RADIO OBSERVATIONS NEEDED!!
Organization: University of Western Ont, London
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 16:46:20 GMT

        PERSEID OBSERVATIONS BY RADIO URGENTLY NEEDED


Now that the peak of the Perseid shower has ended attempts are being made
to determine what activity levels really were like. I have some visual
results but have not receiveed any results from any radio amateurs/ham
operators. I would be VERY interested to hear from radio operators who
observed the shower what the activity was like - even qualitative impressions
would be useful at this point.

Peter Brown              peter@canlon.physics.uwo.ca
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: jon@Turing.ORG (Jon Gefaell (KD4CQY))
Subject: Re: Differences between IC-W2A DJ-580 FT-470 TH78A
Organization: The Turing Project, Charlottesville Virginia.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 13:05:36 GMT

In article <1992Aug12.054229.15016@news.Hawaii.Edu> dakujak@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu (Albert Dakujaku) writes:
>
>	When I meant decode, I meant the ability for the radio to figure out
>what exact CTCSS code is being transmitted on a frequency (i.e. 107.2) while
>this tone system is being used by another radio.
>	I own a Yaesu FT-415 and it has this ability.  What the radio does is 
>it scans through the CTCSS tones until one of them breaks the squelch.
>	My friend owns a W2A and it does not have this feature.  I do not know
>of any other radio that has this ability. Does anybody know of another 
>handheld that has this feature? or is it unique to this radio?

on any radio with CTCSS decode support I've found it trivial to turn tone on,
and then rotate the selector through the PL tones until squelch breaks. 


Unless I'm wrong, the Yaesu 'feature' merely has the effect of somewhat
automating this process. Not a Primary feature, far as I can tell. Of course,
it would be a secondary or tertiary nicety...
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: feg@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (forrest.e.gehrke)
Subject: Re: QST, in my opinion...
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 15:36:08 GMT

In article <1992Aug16.125047.18673@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) writes:

>>fred - we can grow more trees.  You'd have a more sound critique of the League
>>and QST if you leave the enviro-wacko stuff out.  Magazines today use thinner 
>>paper than ever and in general the amateur mags have less pages than they did 
>>a decade ago.
>
>That's a sad commentary in itself. The number of amateurs in the US
>has grown by about 25% over the last decade, yet the number of pages
>in the ham magazines have declined. I guess all those hams are playing
>Nintendo on their new Japanese handhelds. :-(
>
>Gary KE4ZV

Maybe it is also a lack of really good publishable articles.  I am
on the editorial review board of Communications Quarterly for
antenna articles and related measurements subjects.  

It is a rarity to see an article that is technically correct and   
does not attempt to refute or repeal basics like Ohm's Law, 
Conservation of Energy, etc.  I am not addressing such items as 
spelling, grammar, and so forth; these are things any editor can fix.

I had one recently which attempted to tell prospective readers that
reflected power was lost power.  There were equations to prove
it, too!

Forrest Gehrke feg@dodger.att.com
From: oo7@ut-emx.uucp (Derek Wills)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: paddles, portable
Keywords: details, details...
Date: 21 Aug 92 21:33:54 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

MOSIER@iris.uncg.EDU (Steve Mosier) says:

(I said)
>> Perhaps you could do what the boy scouts do, and make a paddle out
>> of two twigs that you can leave behind at each camping site...

>Good idea, but remember this only works with conductive trees, like ironwood.

I didn't post the full plans the first time around, admittedly.  One
thing you can do is keep some metal foil with you that you wrap around
the twigs, another solution is to wet the twigs with some convenient
nearby liquid.

Ironwood trees are OK, yes, although it's easier just to use the twigs.


Derek Wills (AA5BT, G3NMX)
Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, 
Austin TX 78712.  (512-471-1392)
oo7@astro.as.utexas.edu 
oo7@emx.utexas.edu
From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: 150kHz - 30MHz receive-only antenna wanted.
Date: 19 Aug 92 12:29:26 GMT
Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Gannett Technologies Group

In article <1992Aug17.152254.2662@chamber.in-berlin.de> root@chamber.in-berlin.de (Patrick Wendt) writes:
>Is there any kind of antenna available which covers the
>whole area between 150kHz and 30MHz for receiving activity ?
>I just wanna listen on shortwave-frequencies as I'm not
>allowed to transmit, well, not yet. But listening can
>bring up performance for example in CW.
>I've not the possibility to use long wires or huge
>antennas, so I look for a small receive-only antenna
>as mentioned above.

Well, long wires are the classic solution, but if you don't have space,
you don't have space. An alternative for receiving only is a voltage
probe antenna. Basically this is just a short vertical whip with a
very high impedance FET follower to transform the impedance. These
can be used with or without built in pre-selection circuitry. I'd
recommend *with*. MFJ makes a junky one. I'm not sure who makes a
high quality unit. Naturally you could build your own. It's pretty
basic.

Gary KE4ZV
Xref: sparky rec.radio.amateur.misc:14139 rec.radio.amateur.packet:2207
From: michael@vk2bea.UUCP (Michael G. Katzmann)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: data compression with packet:  legal?
Date: 19 Aug 92 13:43:28 GMT
Reply-To: michael@vk2bea.UUCP (Michael G. Katzmann)
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Organization: Broadcast Sports Technology, Crofton. Maryland.

In article <1992Aug15.134313.13763@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) writes:
>In article <398@arrl.org> lhurder@arrl.org (Luck Hurder KY1T) writes:
 >>
 >>
 >>From the ARRL's FCC Rulebook:
 >>
 >>"Above 50 MHz where data and RTTY emissions are permitted, 
 >>unspecified digital codes may be used in communication between stations
 >>licensed by the FCC.  Baudot, AMTOR and ASCII are specified in
 >>the rules, so unspecified includes everything else..."
 >
 >Let's make sure we aren't talking apples and oranges here. Baudot and
 >ASCII are bit encodings for *characters*, AMTOR uses the same encoding
 >as Baudot. Meanwhile, *compression* is done at the *text* level, not

Not so my friend.  Whilst there is a one to one correspondence of
available characters between BAUDOT(Murray) and AMTOR( plus the 
extra housekeeping bytes), the encodings are quite different.
AMTOR uses seven bit characters. Each valid AMTOR character 
has a 4/3 ratio of mark to space (or visa-versa, I don't recall off hand). 
This is used to determine if an error has been received. Many SITOR 
decoders and some older AMTOR decoders output
BAUDOT, so it can be printed on a regular teletype (tm reg).

-- 
Michael Katzmann	  >	Broadcast Sports Technology Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	 <	Crofton, Maryland. U.S.A
Amateur Radio Stations:   >
NV3Z / VK2BEA / G4NYV	 <	opel!vk2bea!michael@uunet.uu.net
From: waco@cbnewse.cb.att.com (john.l.broughton)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Huge Antenna at Augsburg
Date: 18 Aug 92 13:02:38 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <9208142017.AA0fc7@catipult.anatcp.rockwell.com> daemon@ucsd.edu
(The Devil Himself) writes

>Greetings...
>Nick, KD4CPL wrote about seeing a huge, round antenna in the area near 
>Augsburg, wondering what it was.
>
>That antenna is an AN/FLR-9 receiving antenna, used for WORLDWIDE monitoring
>and direction finding.  I worked there in the mid '70s, when the Army 
>Security Agency had the facility.  The ASA no longer exists, and I don't 
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  Does that mean my ASA insignia pins are now more valuable?  Please observe
  30 seconds of silence for the ASA.  Never saw the antenna at Augsburg, but
  we had a nice array of towers and wires at Rothwesten, near Kassel.

>know who owns the facility now.
>
>What did I do there?  Worked on model 28 Teletypes...
>
>73,
>Alan, N7CEU
>
>
>
>
>Alan V. Cook
>Rockwell International
>(714) 762-0843
>(714) 762-0662 - FAX

73,

John L. Broughton, WB9VGJ
AT&T
Naperville, IL
john.l.broughton@att.com
att!john.l.broughton

Former 058 (morse code interceptor, ASA)

QSA IMI K
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: harp@bnr.ca (Alan Harp)
Subject: R7 Antennas
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Research Triangle Park, NC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 12:50:34 GMT

There was a recent query about using the R7 on an apartment.

Well I finally got mine to work on 30 meters after adjusting the capacitor
on the trap.  You heat it with a heat gun and adjust it like a trombone.
If you destroy the heat shrink on it put some new heat shrink on it.

Anyway the R7 is a vertical and performes like a vertical.  It is about
as light as it can be.  It uses a special balun and seven whiskers on the
bottom to prevent the need for radials.  I got slightly better SWR by
adding a coaxial balun (A roll of coax placed at the feed point).

A vertical on 40 meters may seem lousy compared to a dipole for daytime
QSOs around the state.  It can outperform the dipole when chasing DX on 40
at night.  

I use it on a Motor Home.  I attach it to the ladder.  I worry that
the wind whipping it will eventually loosen the ladder.  It's better
than using a mobile whip.  I is easily disassembled and stores for 
travel.  I can set it up or take it down within a half hour.  
(Not bad for a Gasping Geezer).

****************************************************************************
* Alan Harp K4PB     *     Bell-Northern Research      *   CW FOREVER      *
* mail: harp@bnr.ca  *   Research Triangle Park, NC    *                   *
****************************************************************************
From: brian@ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Kenwood TH-78's Alpha-Numeric Paging
Date: 14 Aug 1992 16:03:30 GMT
Organization: The Avant-Garde of the Now, Ltd.
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

julian@bongo.info.com (Julian Macassey) writes:
>	It would be difficult to to programme a repeater to block DTMF.

Actually, it's not difficult.  An SSI-202 DTMF receiver chip will decode
touch-tones in 50 ms or so, and can be used to mute the repeater's audio
path.  You get a brief 'blip' of TT and then silence.  Typically decoders
listening to the repeater's output won't decode that quickly, so you've
effectively eliminated TT-paging from your repeater.  Gets rid of the
tones blasting out from people sitting on their TT-microphones as well.

If you put a 100 ms audio delay in your repeater as well, you can
completely eliminate the TTs.  Of course it'll sound rotten and make
duplexing impossible, but hey, it's only a hobby.
	- Brian
From: abeals@catnip.berkeley.ca.us (Andrew Scott Beals -- KC6SSS)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: QST, in my opinion...
Date: 18 Aug 92 06:35:20 GMT
Organization: The People's Number Four Cat Farm, Berkeley CA, USA

William=E.=Newkirk%Pubs%GenAv.Mlb@ns14.cca.CR.rockwell.COM writes:

>[hard to find communications magazines in the usual magazine rack]
>Again, the magazine racks are visually "noisy" so it's tough to have a
>design that commands attention.

Which is why magazine publishers that want folks to be able to find them
have a consistent masthead on the top two-three inches so that regular
readers can find the magazine in an unkempt rack.
-- 
Andrew Scott Beals (415) 905-6590 any time                             KC6SSS
abeals@catnip.berkeley.ca.us           ...!apple!catnip.berkeley.ca.us!abeals

Albert Einstein, when asked to describe radio, replied: "You see, wire
telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat.  You pull his tail in New
York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles.  Do you understand this?
And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they
receive them there.  The only difference is that there is no cat."
From: brian@ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: QST, in my opinion...(long)
Date: 19 Aug 92 15:27:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: network.16tp9kINNfvc
Organization: The Avant-Garde of the Now, Ltd.
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

So how many of you are planning to attend the ARRL National Convention
and make your views known to whichever ARRL officials are brave enough
to show up?

Here's a chance to put it in their face - ask the questions, demand the
answers, see if they're really interested in what you have to say, or
whether they're just waffles - you know, flakey, full of holes, and
oozing syrup.

Or, as P.G. Wodehouse puts it, "introduce the vegetable motif."
Figuratively, of course.
	- Brian
From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: PVC Antenna - Beam
Date: 18 Aug 92 14:00:48 GMT
Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Gannett Technologies Group

In article <01GNOVP5ZDB690MTYS@TNTECH.BITNET> JMG%TNTECH.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu (Jeff M. Gold) writes:
>Help??
>
>I recently built the portable vertical antenna from a recent
>CQ article.  It is only 10 foot tall and only has 16 foot of
>wire on the mast and (2) 16 foot radials [which should make
>it a 1/4 wave lenght].  Somehow it works fine and I have had
>a lot of sucess taking it portable for QRP work on
>mountains, motels, my driveway, etc.
>
>This month's issue has a beam version of the PVC antenna.
>Of course I am excited about the prospect of gain and
>directionality. The article has the antenna wound with a
>full wave lenght of wire (33 feet each half of the driven
>element).  The article says something about the additional
>wire compensating for helically winding the elements.
>
>I am puzzled for 2 reasons (I am relatively new at all this
>stuff, love to try new antennas... but I am learning by
>doing and reading at the same time)
>
>        1.  how come there is such a descrepency between the
>            wavelenths of wire used?

I haven't seen the articles, I don't subscribe to CQ, so I need
to ask a few questions. What is the length of the driven element of
the beam? What is the element to element spacing. In general terms,
the shorter the physical element length, the more wire you have to
wrap around it to get the same electrical element length. The mutual
coupling brought about by close spacing also has an effect.

>        2.  in the article on the beam the author built a
>            driven element and then a director.  All the
>            articles and books show a 2 element beam to
>            have a driven and reflector.  What is the dif.
>            in performance?

Again in general terms, a full size driven element-reflector combination
usually gives a higher front to back ratio than a full size driven element-
director combination. The forward gain is much the same. With shortened
antennas, the situation becomes much more complex. In general, shortened
reflectors aren't very effective while shortened directors work somewhat
better. In either case, the front to back ratios and gains available from
shortened antennas are worse than for full size antennas.

Note that high front to back ratios and maximum forward gain seldom
occur at the same point. An antenna can be optimized for one or the
other, but trying to maximize both leads to compromises in the performance
of the antenna in both dimensions.

Gary KE4ZV
From: tooyevaa@angus.mi.org (ted ooyevaar)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Need info on HEATH company
Date: 23 Aug 92 15:41:11 GMT
Reply-To: tooyevaa@angus.mi.org
Organization: North Star BBS

pete@zehntel (Peter Danan) writes:

> A while back there was a discussion about whether the Heath company had
> partially or completely folded.  If they have not folded completely, I 
> need to contact their parts/service department.  Anyone have their 
> (hopefully still in existance) address or phone number ?
> 
> Tnx,
> 
> Pete
> KC6IPR
>   
  Well on the #, i'm not positive, but call Information for their #, the 
areacode is 616 (so 616-555-1212) and ask for heath in benton harbor or 
st. joseph(Sp?)  and they are about out of existance, you better hurry!
  -Ted

--
ted ooyevaar (tooyevaa@angus.mi.org)
North Star BBS, Royal Oak, MI --------------------------------------------+-
From: enge@almaden.ibm.com (Roy Engehausen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: RACES Callout for fires in California
Date: 20 Aug 92 15:16:21 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

From    : W6SF @ W6SF.#NOCAL.CA.USA.NA
To      : RACES @ ALLCA
Date    : 920819/1918
Msgid   : B+ 1490@W6SF, 11006@AA4RE $1490_W6SF
Subject : XSJ OES CALLOUT 12:10 8/19/92


SAN JOAQUIN CO. RACES MEMBERS ARE TO CALL MIKE COCKRELL 209-468-3962
FOR REGION 4 MUTUAL AID CALLOUT FOR CDF, ET AL.

CITY OF STOCKTON RACES MEMBERS ARE TO CONTACT DARREL SMITH

REGION 4 RESPONDERS ARE URGED TO REPORT TO THEIR PRIMARY CONTACTS
FOR ASSIGNMENT.

NNNN EOM
From: mikemr@microsoft.COM
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Vertical antenna for a covenant-restricted lot?
Date: 22 Aug 92 15:51:02 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

The DX-88 would be a good choice. You can break it apart at the
joint between the lower section and the 40/80 meter coils by
removing two 10-32 screws. That would leave just the lower
4 feet attached to the support. It's faster and easier than
trying to unbolt the U-clamps.

I have one of the first DX-88s off the production line. It's
an excellent antenna, extremely rugged physically and electrically.
Another nice feature is that you can easily resonate every band
by tuning the piston capacitors. You can do this at ground level.
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: rdewan@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Rajiv Dewan)
Subject: GAP Voyager DX IV: any experience?
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 13:58:59 GMT

I have been reading about the GAP Voyager DX-IV.  It is a mid fed
vertical for 160m, 80m, 40m and 20m bands.  It is 45' tall with a
8' dia. top hat for an electrical length of 64'.  It has three 57'
counterpoise radials at the base.

Does any one one on the net have any experience with this antenna?
How does it perform on 40 and 80m?  I am interested in DX and contest
performance.

My guess is that its performance on 40m and 80m is similar to that
of the Challenger DX-VI (which is half the electrical size of the 
Voyager) on 20 and 40m respectively.  Any experience with
this one?

In the 73 review of the GAP Challenger, the reviewer mentions that
the GAP was 1 s-unit down from a monoband QJR antenna designed by
Ted Hart, W5QJR.  What is a monoband QJR antenna?
Any comments would be appreciated.

Rajiv                                 
aa9ch    
Address: r-dewan@nwu.edu
Phone:   None. Only CW.