HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: graham@venus.iucf.indiana.edu (JIM GRAHAM)
Subject: Re: Flush Limburger
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4   
Reply-To: graham@venus.iucf.indiana.edu
Organization: Indiana University Cyclotron Facility, Bloomington, Indiana
Distribution:  world
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 16:00:53 GMT

In article <LARRY.92Dec25071620@peak.psl.nmsu.edu>, larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way) writes...
>	[.. definitions of "bigot" deleted ..]
> 
>JIM> Fine.  So far, I've seen two definitions of "bigot".
> 
>JIM> But, no one has YET shown a single definitive example that
>JIM> shows Rush to be a bigot.
> 
>JIM> I suspect there aren't any, or I would have been flooded with
>JIM> them by now, considering how quickly the left tends to label
>JIM> those opposed to their ideologies, without first getting the
>JIM> facts.
> 
>JIM> I'm waiting....
> 
>There you have it, folks. Definitive PROOF that Rush Limbaugh is NOT 
>a bigot.

Oh come now.

Where is the definition?

Grow up a little bit and answer my question.

It's a simple one.  I figure any moron (a word usually reserved for
use by liberals) can handle it. :-)

> 
>L.
>"Yeh, Buddy..            | larry@psl.nmsu.edu (Larry Cunningham)|  _~~_
> I've got your COMPUTER! | % Physical Science Laboratory        | (O)(-)
> Right HERE!!"           | New Mexico State University          |  /..\ 
> (computer THIS!)        | Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 88003    |   <> 
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are CORRECT, mine, and not PSLs or NMSUs..
>Tularosa: tullies, roses, lava, white sands, and home of THEM! (atomic ants).

Jim Graham 

        -> ->Disclaimer: I do not speak for my company. <- <-
                          Neither do they speak for me.
 ______________________________________________________________________
| Internet: graham@venus.iucf.indiana.edu                              |
|           dolmen!jgraham@moose.cs.indiana.edu                        |
| BBS:      The PORTAL DOLMEN BBS/ParaNet ALPHA-GAMMA (sm) (9:1012/13) |
|            (812) 334-0418, 24hrs.                                    |
|______________________________________________________________________|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion
From: patrick@rio-grande.is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Spoken Like a True ProLifer
Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas
	<1992Dec24.234313.26934@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>
	<1992Dec28.075957.19167@wetware.com>
	<1992Dec29.033417.17787@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 16:01:48 GMT

In article <1992Dec29.033417.17787@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:

   Xref: rice alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:11276 talk.abortion:101859
   Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show,talk.abortion
Path: rice!newsfeed.rice.edu!bcm!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ringer!lonestar.utsa.edu!sbooth
   From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
   Sender: news@ringer.cs.utsa.edu
   Nntp-Posting-Host: lonestar.utsa.edu
   Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
   References: <1h536uINNcpl@meaddata.meaddata.com> <1992Dec24.234313.26934@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> <1992Dec28.075957.19167@wetware.com>
   Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 03:34:17 GMT
   Lines: 21

   In article <1992Dec28.075957.19167@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
   >sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
   >
   >]
   >] I read this and was sickened by it.  All I've got to say is that's what
   >] the death penalty is for.  I honestly hope those three killers get the
   >] gas chamber, no appeals.
   >]
   >] Call me crude, but something must be done.
   >]
   >] Simon
   >]
   >
   >
   >thanks simon, I was often confused about
   >your commitment to the sanctity of all human life....

   This is precisely why I feel that these murderers should be executed.

Thanks for proving drieux's point for him, without your realizing it, of
course...:-)

(You may now claim that it was all just a joke.)


--

Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:10542 alt.rush-limbaugh:12050 alt.politics.clinton:18979 alt.politics.homosexuality:8273 alt.politics.bush:14818
From: krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: Alternative Families
Date: 19 Dec 92 22:28:18 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson AZ

In article <17DEC199211424690@zeus.tamu.edu> rlc1028@zeus.tamu.edu writes:
>In article <1992Dec17.160646.20839@Arco.COM>, dprjdg@inetg1.ARCO.COM (John Grasham) writes...
>
>|It is important to portray families based on sexual practices because the
>|sexual activities of the parents matter to the children.  It matters a
>|great deal to them.
>
>	I have not found young children to be aware of sexual practises between 
>their parents or anyone, with the exception of kissing, perhaps.  They 
>know mommy and daddy sleep together, but usually no more than that.

Do you have any children?  I have a 10-year-old and a 5-year-old, and there 
is not really any way we can keep our sexual practices out of their attention.  
Without getting into any personal practices here, I would say that IMO, any 
couple who believes that their children are unaware that activities beyond 
kissing are going on, either is naive or very discrete.  Children, at least 
mine, are well aware that other activies occur "beyond the locked door."
>
>|Any child that lives in a family with two parents of the same sex, will be
>|well aware of the difference between his/her family and any other.
>
>	Yes, at some point.  

And I argue that it is much younger than you think.

>
Ted


-- 
So the Maples formed a union, and demanded equal rights, "The Oaks are just 
too greedy.  We will make them give us light!"  Now there's no more Oak 
oppression, for they passed a noble law.  And the trees are all kept equal, 
by hatchet, axe and saw.     -  Rush, The Trees
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Twists on gays in military
Keywords: practicality
Date: 31 Dec 92 01:01:40 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group


>|> Q:  How about those who like to have sex with dead people
>|> (necro-sexuals?)?  Don't they have a right to serve in the
>|> military?  Where would they be housed? 
>
>Once again we come back to the "Gays are criminals" viewpoint.
>I've heard this argument a hundred times in this group.  This
>is just like comparing a homosexual to a pedophile or a serial
>rapist.  ONCE AND FOR ALL:  [stuff deleted]

No, he has a point.  If the military starts allowing avowed
necrophiles to serve, then the military would have to build
seperate shower and sleeping facilities for all the dead people
already serving in the military.   So either they can't allow 
necrophiles to serve, or they will have to allow all the dead 
people to retire or discharge them.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl)
Subject: Re: Spoken Like a True ProLifer
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 22:09:49 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM Rochester

In article <C0338G.794@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, vengeanc@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu () writes:
|> 
|> Liberal Definition of Values: Restrictions stopping us from doing anything
|> 			      we want without any repercussions or
|> 			      responsibilities.

Conservatives moan and whine about a lack of values and
don't even have a clue what they are talking about.  Bush
showed us his values by pardoning a bunch of criminals.
Might makes right.

And what do you know about my or any liberal's values?
NOTHING!

|> It seems to me these values are being taught very well to liberal's children.
|> Poor kids.

Let's see:  Tolerance of others who are different, helping
the needy.  I say lucky kids.  I had to wait until college
to learn many of these things.

|> This is what I have repeatedly labeled the "incentives to stay poor".

The real incentives to stay poor are the lack of jobs
that allow a person to raise a family.  People could
get off of welfare if they could get a real job.  The
McDonalds example was pure conservative BS.  Could you
raise a family on minimum wage in NY or LA?  Let's make
jobs, not excuses.

|> Good idea!  They also should be forced to demonstrate a willingness to
|> educate or prepare themselves for REAL LIFE.  

Education is expensive, are we going to pay for that?
We sure as hell don't now...
And just how would you have these people demonstrate
this willingness?  Let's hear your ideas, I'm sure
they are just grand.


Jared Dahl
Opinions expressed are mine, not my employer's.
Don't send e-mail - I won't get it.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl)
Subject: Re: Rush -- Insurance and AIDS
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 15:31:09 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM Rochester

In article <Bzr27M.E70@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, vengeanc@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu () writes:
|> dickw@IASTATE.EDU (Richard Wallingford) writes:
|> 
|> >Rush was talking about people whose insurance gets canceled when it
|> >is found that they have AIDS.  He thinks it's just fine that they're
|> >canceled because they caused their own condition (he used the analogy
|> >that fire insurance won't pay if you set your own house on fire).

So hemopheliacs and AIDS babies caused their own condition?
Rush just doesn't think before he talks sometimes.
 
|> >I don't think Rush understands insurance very well.  First, his
|> >analogy is faulty because fire insurance *will* cover accidental
|> >fires started by the homeowner (i.e. grease fire) and most AIDS
|> >cases are contracted by accident (even if there is stupididty and
|> >ignorance involved).  
|> 
|> >Second, if a person has health insurance *before* he/she gets AIDS, 
|> >then the insurance company should be required to pay up to the maximum 
|> >lifetime benefit of the policy.  Risk is the whole principal behind
|> >insurance coverage.  The insurance company is "betting" that you won't
|> >get sick and you're "betting" that you will.  Both parties are agreeing
|> >to take the financial loss if they lose the "bet" by signing the policy!
|> 
|> Hmm.. Ever considered this alternate scenario?  The insurance company
|> is investing in your health like it is stock.  When the value of that
|> stock is beginning to decline they sell it off.

Insurance companies have been getting away with this for
years.  They refuse to honor someones VALID insurance policy,
and then wait for them to die.  Often, these people are dead
before the case gets to court, and the lawsuit dies with them.
These guys are scam artists and bastards, not businessmen.


Jared Dahl
Opinions expressed are mine, not my employer's.
Don't send e-mail - I won't get it.
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:10759 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show:50
From: john@anasazi.com (John R. Moore)
Subject: Re: Conservative?  Hahaha....
Reply-To: john@anasazi.com
Organization: Anasazi, Inc.  Phoenix, Arizona USA
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 18:13:04 GMT

Keywords: 

In article <C08L2F.I7F@ddsw1.mcs.com> karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger) writes:
]I have noticed a definite hypocrisy in the term "Conservative", especially
]as applied by Rush...
]
]Has anyone noted that Rush, and most other "Conservatives", support the
]measure which passed in Colorado (family values and all that)?
]
]Yet, is not one of the founding principles of conservative thought that the
]government should make fewer laws, and leave people more alone (than the
]liberals)?
]
]Indeed, just what kind of hypocrits are these folks?

The Colorado Law reduced the number of laws (by prohibiting certain forms
of special group protection laws). As such, it fits with the criteria
you give for conservatives. Hypocritical? Not at all!
-- 
John Moore NJ7E, 7525 Clearwater Pkwy, Scottsdale, AZ 85253  (602-951-9326)
john@anasazi.com ncar!noao!asuvax!anasaz!john anasaz!john@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
Get into Ham Radio today! Morse Code no longer needed! It's a hobby, a sport, a
convenience, a technical challenge, a public service. Go rec.radio.amateur.misc
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way)
Subject: Re: Thewindbag Against Mo
Organization: New Mexico State University, MetaPhysical Science Laboratory
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 04:42:22 GMT

>>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 92 00:58:00 PDT, Ed.Sterrett@f166.n363.z1.fidonet.org (Ed Sterrett) said:
	[...]
Ed>  
Ed>   Of course, the easiest way to get out of jury duty is to
Ed> have one of the attorneys disqualify you.  All ya gotta do-
Ed> When they ask you their questions during the selection
Ed> process, just answer "Is this an executable offense?  Can we
Ed> give 'em death?"  Doesn't matter what the question is, just
Ed> give them that answer..  <g> Of course the prosecution may
Ed> want to keep you, but the defense will just say, "NEXT!"
Ed>  

Try that. You might find out just how poor a sense of humor the justice
system has. Prospective jurors can be charged with contempt over little
cutsy smart assed comments like this. (Apparently some people take this
trial by jury business pretty seriously.)

I am reminded of a college pal who thought he would get cute with the
Border Patrol one night as he crossed over into El Paso from Juarez. When
asked his citizenship, he replied: "U.S."

Then as he stepped forward, he added: "S.R." My friend got to be detained
over an hour and came close to getting a free body cavity search before he
started bawling his eyes out and managed to talk them out of it.

As a rule, no government agency has any sense of humor.

L.
"Yeh, Buddy..            | larry@psl.nmsu.edu (Larry Cunningham)|  _~~_
 I've got your COMPUTER! | % Physical Science Laboratory        | (O)(-)
 Right HERE!!"           | New Mexico State University          |  /..\ 
 (computer THIS!)        | Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 88003    |   <> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are CORRECT, mine, and not PSLs or NMSUs..
And, by golly, to a soul, they all wore *suits* in this place called Hell.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson)
Subject: So, anyone want to talk about Rush Limbaugh around here?
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 18:52:16 GMT

...my killfile is huge.



Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Subject: Re: Kicked out of a.f.d-q?  I don't think so
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 23:15:07 GMT

In article <nate.960@psygate.psych.indiana.edu> nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle) writes:
>aa680@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Vern Morrison) writes:
>>krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) says:
>>>If you lefties think that this is a contradiction, you should spend some
>>>time over on alt.fan.dan.quayle.  I got kicked out of that group because I
>>>didn't think that dan is as dumb as the media portrays him.
>
>>        I've never before heard anyone claim to have been kicked out of
>>an unmoderated newsgroup.
>
>    This is admittedly the first time I've ever heard anyone make that
>claim as well, but I've seen a couple of cases in which hordes of people
>have posted "requests" for other dissenting persons to butt out and leave
>a group until they have "learned" more appropriate opinions. Consider the
>case of Steve Chaney or Jack Schmidling. Basically these two guys have
>gotten unpopular enough that they can no longer hold fruitful discussions
>here because people are so busy berating them for past transgressions or
>trying to put words in their mouthes in order to create new offenses. Both
>of these individuals have been effectively "kicked out

   A while back I ran into something like this on talk.abortion.  I admit
that I initially went overboard in the content of my postings, but I got
flamed worse after I tried to tone down my articles.  I even got flamed
after acknoweldging the need for compromise and attempting to find
common ground.  There were even a couple of users who expressed an
arrogant, holier-than-thou attitude against college students and newcomers
to the net, repeatedly questioning the right of 'some people' to have net
access due to their opinions.  They flamed so much that you couldn't even
tell what side they were one since they were making personal attacks
almost exclusively.  Most of my articles had responses telling me how
stupid I was or thatI should leave the net until I 'learn proper procedures',
similar to what happened to Chaney and others, no matter how logical or
polite my postings

   No one kicked me out either, I left voluntarily as well.  I had gotten
tired of the pointless flaming and the occasional nasty e-mail, sent
anonymously of course.

Simon

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Subject: Re: A Stolen Life, A Dying Soul
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 02:55:26 GMT

In article <1992Dec24.234313.26934@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>
>I read this and was sickened by it.  All I've got to say is that's what
>the death penalty is for.  I honestly hope those three killers get the
>gas chamber, no appeals.
>
>Call me crude, but something must be done.
>
>Simon
>And I almost forgot-- Merry Christmas!!
From: ryanm@hardy.u.washington.edu (Ryan Mcneilly)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Education Regarding Alternative Family Units (Re: The Analogy Be
Date: 30 Dec 1992 17:16:32 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
NNTP-Posting-Host: hardy.u.washington.edu

In article <218.2B416B97@business.fidonet.org> Lyn.Perez@f157.n363.z1.fidonet.org (Lyn Perez) writes:
>In a forum which is addressing christian values, I am taken back abit by the venomous accusations and uncharitable manner in which you are addressing each other.  I don't recall ever seeing the cuss words you are using in the bible.   Perhaps I am interp
reting the greek and hebrew inappropriately, but your language is not reminiscience of biblical euphamisms.  Please respond.
>
>--  
>        Lyn Perez  -  via FidoNet Node: 1:363/42
>             UUCP:  -  ...tarpit!tous!business!157!Lyn.Perez
>             ARPA:  -  Lyn.Perez@f157.n363.z1.fidonet.org


You are correct.  I am not the original poster but am a Christian.  The
original poster needs to look at his posts and evaluate to see if it is
what Jesus would be saying in a forum like this.  I think testing to see
if is what Jesus would see is a good test as to whether or not it should
be posted.

For those who are Christian out there, use this test.  I try to use it all
the time, although my human nature feelings do show through from time to
time.  Many arguements can be settled in this way without name calling.

--Ryan

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
  Ryan McNeilly                    Internet: ryanm@u.washington.edu
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"You can't deal from a position of weakness"  --Alfred Thayer Mahan
Moral:  Protect the 2nd Amendment!

My comments and opinions are my own and nobody elses!!!!!
From: roby@chopin.udel.edu (Scott W Roby)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush in Philly
Keywords: ratings, tv show
Date: 21 Dec 92 19:36:36 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

In article <gratrix.724690714@spot.Colorado.EDU> gratrix@spot.Colorado.EDU (Jackie Gratrix) writes:
>
>Can someone in Philadelphia enlighten the rest of us on
>how well Rush's tv show is doing in its "test" time
>slot?  Has there been much discussion of this move by
>the local media?

I haven't seen any mention of it in the Wilmington, DE newspaper, 
which also covers Philadelphia TV.  The local affiliate is running 
many ads during the show saying that this is a three week 
test, so "tell everybody to watch".  

I am leaving the area for the holidays, but if you remind me, I 
can let you know in mid-January if the test was successful or not.  

I'm not sure I understand the reason for this test, as I am so used to 
local affiliates and/or cable companies doing what they damn 
well please and not worrying about the audience...  :-)

I still find it amusing that Rush at 10am is followed by M*A*S*H.  

Rush at 11pm has to compete with the local newscasts.
He was previously on at 1:30am competing with nobody.

Has anyone noticed the distinctly *different* brand of advertisers 
that appear when Rush is on versus other times?  I have...  :-)
NRA, tax revolt literature, etc.  



-- 
Scott W. Roby           *This sentence no verb.*      "No Matter where you go..
Phys.& Astr.Dept.    ///// / /  /  *|*  \  \ \ \\\\\      there you are!"
Univ.of Delaware    ((((( ( (  (  * + *  )  ) ) )))))   -> Buckaroo Banzai
roby@brahms.udel.edu \\\\\ \ \  \  *|*  /  / / /////   *Standard Disclaimer*
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Subject: Re: A Stolen Life, A Dying Soul
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 23:43:13 GMT


I read this and was sickened by it.  All I've got to say is that's what
the death penalty is for.  I honestly hope those three killers get the
gas chamber, no appeals.

Call me crude, but something must be done.

Simon

From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 18:42:58 GMT
Subject: Re: Rush -- Insurance and AIDS
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

Thank you! I never asked you for an obligatory sig... 
Perhaps you were thinking of Glen S. who completely reamed you in 
the posting re: your sending him E-mail without you name etc..

I recall that he did make some comment about this, Edward Simmonds
and I completely enjoyed how Glen S. took you through a meatgrinder.

You appear dazed and confused..you cant even keep your ledger straight
now.... you've been busy E-mailing instead of posting where everyone
can read your crap.  

Please, satisfy me some more ... insert "what? me worry?" or 
"I'm a Putz".. or how about "Triumph of the Will"...

Thank you also for my demand for you to post in public.  I didnt
realize how much power I had over you.... 

Look into my eyes, Edward....   Now pull your pants down and 
moon the net... NOW!

all disclaimers apply
"Trees make more smog than cars..." R. Reagan




Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.tv-show,talk.abortion