From: Megan Yuen <cyyuen@silver.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: (none)
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 15:57:19 GMT

Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: New Discovery of Element
Summary: 
Expires: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: Indiana University
Keywords: 

In article <4908@transfer.stratus.com> cheung@strider.hw.stratus.com () writes:
>
>		     Discovery of A New Element
>		         Copyright Protected
>
>Element:		Woman
>Symbol:			Wo
>Atomic Weight:		120, isotopes having atomic weight ranging from 80
>			to 300 can also be found.
>Physical Properties:	Highly volatile in temperature, can be extremely hot
>			under which any Man can be melted, can be extremely
>			cold when being left alone;
>			normally odorless;
>			turns color when placed next to a better looking 
>			member of the same species;
>			usually sweet, frequently sour, and sometimes bitter.
>Chemical Properties:	Strong affinity to precious metal and stone, ex. Au,
>			Ag, and C in its form of diamond;
>			usually called cash reduction agent because of its
>			capability of removing cash from Man;
>			emits large amount of energy when consuming cash;
>			forms molecule with Man with the aid of intramolecule
>			bonds, of which two types exist:  ionic bond which all
>			the wealth is transferred to Wo and covalent bond by
>			which Wo and Man share the burden.
>Identifying Wo:		The most effective way of identifying the presence
>			of Wo is to introduce a mouse or any obnorxious 
>			animal into a confined space.
>Collecting Wo:		There is no two Wo element can co-exist.  Therefore,
>			don't make any attempt to do so.
>			


This is cute one!  How long have you spent in investigating 
before you come up this "Discovery Report"?


Megan 

P.S.  By the way, I don't think every member of Wo has the same
      chemical properties as you mentioned.  Agree?!














Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: New Discovery of Element
Summary: 
Expires: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: Indiana University
Keywords: 

In article <1992Jul17.131500.29122@cs.rochester.edu> luk@cs.rochester.edu (Steve Luk) writes:
>In article <1992Jul17.033415.2648@PA.dec.com> mok@fortsc.enet.dec.com (Charles Mok) writes:
>>
>>In article <1992Jul17.024801.9192@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>, man@king.ecn.purdue.edu (Man Fai Tam) writes...
>>>It is quite funny for such a description of Wo. Hope it is not sexism.
>>>Try it to be fair and equal for both man and woman. How you could 
>>>describe the element MAN which is co-existing with WOMAN.
>>> 
>>>---Kelvin
>>> 
>>
>>I am very surprised to find anyone thinking some crap like that is funny.
>>
>>If it is not sexist, let me ask what is?
>>
>>Being sexist the other way around does not eliminate the derogatory nature
>>either.  It only makes it worse.
>>
>>Charles
>>
>
>Hey! I find that funny too!
>Craps can be funny. Look at those Chow-Sing-Chi's movies in HK, I
>THINK they are craps, but I STILL go to see them. Why? Cuz they are
>funny!
>
>The most interesting jokes aren't those political ones, they are the
>ones which make you LAUGH.
>
>Pls, don't impose your own standard on others. If you don't find it
>funny, just say it's "NOT FUNNY". I DO appreciate the writer's effort
>of trying to make us laugh.
>
>Please don't take everything thing so seriously, afterall, it's
>summer!
>
>Flames are welcomed , but sorry, I won't take them seriously!
>
>
>
>
>steve
>"Life is short, PLAY HARD" (c)


Steve, I agree with you!!  


Megan
"Life is short, play hard and play harder"!