HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: britten@utklib.lib.utk.edu (Bill Britten)
Subject: wnqvtnet questions
Organization: University of Tennessee Library
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 13:16:07 GMT

I've successfully installed wnqvtnet303, but I'd appreciate help on a couple 
of questions.

1.  I get a lot of "hardware buffer overflow" messages which don't seem to 
be doing any harm, but .... ?

2.  When I fire up the ftp server, I can't use any other network software (e.
g. gopher client).  I get a "Cannot find tcp stack" or "no handles" message.
But wnqvtnet is able to go out on the net when in ftp server mode.  Any
suggestions appreciated ...

Bill Britten
U of Tenn
britten@utklib.lib.utk.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"win3-l@uicvm"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:48:00 MET
Comments:     This mail was sent from cluster RUUCLA using PMDF V3.0
From:         Anneke Sicherer-Roetman <ANNEKE@HUTRUU54.BITNET>
Subject:      ps printing

P.S. I should have added that I program in C/C++. Anneke
From: z_rasmusseam@ccsvax.sfasu.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Needed IBM Printer Drivers!
Date: 17 Nov 92 11:49:58 CST
Organization: Stephen F. Austin State University

	I have recently been digging around in the storage room of our
Library and I found a IBM 3812 Laser printer.  Would anyone out there happen
to know of any drivers (for windows) for this printer or of any that are
close enough so that I can use it?  It works fine (from the test function and
from Word Perfect (which uses its own drivers)).  Any and all help is
appreciated.  Thank in advance.    
    ------=====*****=====*****======*****=====*****=====------
    | Adam Murrell Rasmussen                                 |
    |   -- Lpc, C, Pascal, COBOL, Programmer                 |
    |      LINC Network Technician, Steen Library Computing. |
    |      Lotus Software Specialist.                        |
    |      Currently taking NCE tests.                       |
    | E-Mail: z_rasmusseam@ccsvax.sfasu.edu                  |
    |                qclaw@brick.pvv.unit.no                 |
    ------=====*****=====*****======*****=====*****=====------
From: 4_FSALEEM@FAIR1.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Ftp addresses
Date: 9 Nov 92 16:32:00 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: win3-l@uicvm.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"win3-l@uicvm.bitnet"

Hi netters.

I would like to know if anyone has the address where I can ftp the
FAQ files?  Also, is there a way to get a directory of sites where
one can ftp files from?

Thanks for the help,

FS!

4_fsaleem@fair1.fairfield.edu
fsaleem@admiral.uucp
mgcw55a (prodigy svc)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 09:14:32 CST
From:         A16905@ITESO.BITNET
Subject: Re: DR-DOS and Windows 3.1

The file is DR6WIN.ZIP and it is in the /mirrors/msdos/windows3 directory  on
WUARCHIVE.WUSTL.EDU

You un zip it and will get the general doc and another ZIP. The doc files
tell you what to do with it.

The patch consist of an upgrade of the kernel and some drivers so they
work properly with Windows 3.1

Shalom,
Memo.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sun, 15 Nov 1992 17:06:10 -0700
From:         Mike Lieberman <cwmliebe@ANTELOPE.WCC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: The Next Version of Windows for DOS

On Sun, 15 Nov 1992 BARKER%GONZAGA.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU wrote:
> show a gradual decline in DOS apps (less than 20% of the market by 2001),
> a early rapid increase in Win 16 apps, a larger but slower increase in Win 32
> apps, and a very gradual increase in NT apps (less than 15% of the market by
> 2001).  So, for the everyday user, there must be some accomodation made to
> ensure that old favorites (i.e. DOS and Win 16 apps) and new hot releases
> (i.e. Win 32 apps) can be run under the same operating environment.

We'll see. DOS may hang on a long time.  I suspect it will.  But my bet is
that there is only room for one type of Windows and the 16-bit type will be
gone for all intents and purposes in 24 months.

> Do you think that the next version of Windows for DOS will be 32-bit based
> or just be able utilize the Win-32 subset?  I think the most existing
> change planned for Win 3.x is OLE 2.0.  Being able to edit objects without
> leaving the document will certainly improve my productivity, but after
> seeing the hit OLE 1.0 took on system performance I am a bit afraid of
> 2.0's resourse demands. One thing is for certain, Win 3.x will require an
> 386 or better.

There will be some interim 16-bit releases because of the time it's taking
to get NT out and the question may arise (it did with us out here) why
bother with a 32-bit DOS version?  The issue of DOS compatibility has been
the main bugaboo and I suspect that it isn't worth the effort to support a
DOS version that multi-threads.  The reality is that Windows doesn't run
worth a damn on anything less than a 386dx right now.  That means that
dropping the 16-bit code completely in a couple of years won't have much
real impact on the market.  Just as the dropping of real mode in 3.1
didn't cause much of even a ripple. The issue for all interim releases is
likely to be to create a strong native network personality to the basic
windows package.  That is likely the goal for DOS as well.  With Novell
creating network services built into DR-DOS, MS has no choice but to
compete.  OLE will work well on multi-threading 50MZ and greater 486's.
Everything else will be too slow.

**********************************************************************
* Michael Lieberman              Internet: cwmliebe@antelope.wcc.edu *
*                                Voice Phone: 307-856-9096           *
* Don't crush that dwarf,        Direct Data Line: 307-856-3601      *
* hand me the pliers.      Snail:418 Westchester, Riverton, WY  82501*
**********************************************************************
From: jholmes@mcb.com (jim holmes)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: ATM & TT problem
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 23:32:46 -0500
Reply-To: jholmes@mcb.com
Organization: Message Center

After installing Pagemaker ver4 & it's ATM, ALL my Truetype fonts have gone poof in the night
for Word & Pagemaker. I can still access them from Excel. Anyone out there have a clue
as to how I might fix this?? Thanks..

-jlh

ps. Please reply via e-mail (jholmes@mcb.com) & i'll summrise.

-- 
jim holmes is jholmes@mcb.com or {whatever!}uunet!mcb!jholmes
Message Center of Hartford, CT
------
The above comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Message Center
Xref: sparky bit.listserv.win3-l:10622 comp.os.ms-windows.setup:2069
From: to5232@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l,comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Problems with dial back under windows
Date: 22 Nov 92 16:30:47 -0600
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

I am having a problem getting Dial back to work under Windows.  I regularly log
into a system that has dial back security.  I can log into the system fine but
when I dials back and I try to answer (through modem commands of course), my
machine freezes up.  I believe is related to screen resolution that I am using. 
I have noticed the following:

1.      Dial back will only work under enhanced mode when using the generic
        VGA.DRV.  Any other video drivers will cause the machine to freeze.

2.      I can get dial back to work using 8514\a emulation when running windows
        under standard mode.  This is not satisfactory since I still have DOS
        apps that I still use.

I have a Gateway 486DX33, with a ATI Graphics Ultra Card, an ATI 2400 etc/i
modem, a Microsoft Bus Mouse.  Could someone please explain to my why I cannot
get dial back to work under the environment I would like to under?  Can anyone
suggest to me a way that I can get this to work?

TO5232@ISCSVAX.UNI.EDU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-path: jdeaton@essex.ecn.uoknor.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sun, 15 Nov 1992 17:11:51 CST
From:         "James Deaton" <jdeaton@MAILHOST.ECN.UOKNOR.EDU>
Subject:      MarsTek Hand Scanners
              Ferreira Junior" at Nov 13, 92 4:25 pm

I have been looking for a Windows hand scanner software for the MarsTek 105.
Do any of you know if there is such a program and if so, where I can find it?
I appreciate any help you could offer.




		*************************************
		*         James E. Deaton           *
		*  jdeaton@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu    *
		* jedeaton@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu  *
		*************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:32:27 -0800
From:         Harry S Wahrer <wahrer@CS.UNR.EDU>
Subject:      Re: ATM FOnts and Windows

On Wed, 18 Nov 1992 CMCGREW@UCSVAX.UCS.UMASS.EDU wrote:

> IBM has made the service packs available to owners of OS/2 via download
> or for the price of the disks.  The 3.1 and 32bit graphics engine are both
> getting very good reviews.  I have seen reports from people running it
> and the NT beta and they preferred OS/2.  I'm sure there are some people
> who would feel otherwise; but, the systems requirements on OS/2 are
> shrinking to 3.5megs of RAM and the best offer I've heard from a 32bit
> Windows is somewhere in the neighborhood of 8megs.  I'm sure, once it's
> out on the market, they will start compacting and reworking the code
> like IBM.  One of the big problems with OS/2 is that it reacts differently
> with different types of equipment; but, it currently supports the vast
> majority of video boards etc.  I think IBM is trying to give Microsoft
> a run for their money on the PC market and if a 32bit Windows gets delayed
> much further, they just might pull it off.

Any one know how to get the upgrade disks? and How much?

Thanks

Scott
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 11:57:00 EST
From:         Michael Gordon <GORDONM@DENISON.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: 16 color 800x600 Stealth

>
>Try supervga.drv , which is included in the Windows 3.1 package

        I recommend NOT going this way; one of the advantages of the Diamond
Stealth is that the Diamond drivers are optimized for the S3 chip, which
clearly the generic svga driver is not. If you can't find Stealth 16-color
drivers, then you might look in the package of S3 drivers available at cica.
There may be a 16-color SVGA driver there.

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  20-NOV-1992 11:57:33
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 12:03:02 EST
From:         GADDIEML@MUSC.BITNET
Subject:      RE: MOUSE

In answer to Marcus' question re: using a mouse in DOS apps...I can't tell
you why but I can tell you how I get around it.  I have written .bat files
that first load the mouse.com and then execute the program.  Seems to
work really well!  In the next month or so I'm converting all of our
programs over to the Windows version.  Let me know if I can give any more
info.  Marsha
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL11]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 965
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 08:49:12 -0800
From:         "(Moore)" <moore@EMAIL.NCSC.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Dumb Memory Question

I have an odd problem with my Gateway 486/33. It shipped with (4) 1MB SIMMs
in place, and I stuck (4) 4MB SIMMs in with them; apparently there's a problem
with the Gateway BIOS, though, because the machine only reports back 16MB, and
if I try to remove the first 4x1MB SIMMs I get errors.

So anyway, all this time I've been running in enhanced mode and didn't notice
any problems. When I start up in standard mode, though, Program Manager says
I have *6.6MB* of memory free, loading only the barest things via StartUp.
Where's my memory going? QEMM reports back 13MB free before I start Windows
(~1MB for DOS, 2MB for SmartDrive); so what's happening to the unaccounted
6.4MB!?!

Any ideas please write me directly; otherwise I'm going to have to fiddle with
removing and reinstalling those SIMMs till something clicks...

--
Jim (moore@email.ncsc.navy.mil)

Arthur:       What is this test, o Knights of.....
              Knights who 'til recently said "Ni"?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 15:26:31 ARG
From:         "(Hernan Martinez Foffani)" <hernan@LARGO.MREC.AR>
Subject:      write to a parallel port

Well, as nobody answered me yet I am trying again. :-)

I am working on a windows program that needs to log a lot of actions
to the printer.
Print Manager doesn't flush output until it fills a page or close the
current document. Only with "Escape(..., ENDDOC,...)" or with
"Escape(..., NEWFRAME, ...)" PM flushes output. NEWFRAME is not useful
for me because it print one log message per page, and ENDDOC has the
problem that i need to start a new PM with STARTDOC for every message.
Then i tried to use *Comm() family of functions, but as the manual says
they don't use interrupts for parallel ports. As a result I have garbage
because of overflow on the printer's buffer.
I believe that it could be done. Either saying to PM not to buffer, or
saying PM to flush buffers to the printer, or writing directly to the
LPT1: port. Problem is HOW?
Writing to the port IS what the Print Manager does. So, what primitives
PM use? I thought they were *Comm() but given the garbage I have,
it doesn't seem to.

Please, any solution, or idea, or thought, or at least a support word :-)
would be fine for me.


p.d. : sorry my english, i know it's bad!

--
Hernan Martinez Foffani              | Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores
hernan@largo.mrec.ar                 | Informatica.  Bs.As. Argentina
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:23:45 EST
From:         "(Joseph T. Malloy)" <jmalloy@HAMILTON.EDU>
Subject:      Re: ATM FOnts and Windows
              at Nov 18, 92 10:13 am

>         For what it's worth, ATM 2.5 will probably be as fast as TT.
>
> Michael D. Gordon
> gordonM@cc.denison.edu
> Date sent:  18-NOV-1992 10:13:32
>
Is version 2.5 available?  Have you tested it?  (Not a flame, just a
query!)  Thanks...

joe
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 20:08:03 EST
From:         Craig Neimanis <R3CEN@AKRONVM.BITNET>
Subject:      True Type Fonts Question.

Since I have to do alot of publications and I use Windows 3.1 to do almost
all my work in, I would like to know where I can get some shareware True
Type fonts via FTP.  I saw some on CICA and WUARCHIVE but they are under
copyright investigation.  Is there a True Type Font-Builder shareware
program out there.  And is there a TT Font Installer program out there? I've
spend over a couple hundred dollars on commercial TT Fonts, but I really
like to support shareware authors too.  E-Mail me if you have information.
Thanks alot!

              Craig Neimanis - University of Akron

                                              R3CEN@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L%UICVM.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU"
X-VMS-Cc: CMCGREW
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 11:19:50 -0500
From:         CMCGREW@UCSVAX.UCS.UMASS.EDU
Subject:      Re: .ZIP files on WUARCHIVE

There is a version of UNZIP 5.0 floating around the internet.  I downloaded
mine from WUARCHIVE; but, I don't exactly remember the filename.  It should
be fairly obvious (look in zip directory under msdos).  UNZIP 5.0 hasn't
given me any problems; but, PKZIP 1.1 does periodically.  There was a version
called 1.93 on WUARCHIVE too; but, it was "experimental" and wasn't guaranteed
to work.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Vmsmail-To: SMTP%"win3-l@uicvm.bitnet"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:32:13 -0500
From:         "EDWARD J. GOMEZ" <12666106V@SERVAX.FIU.EDU>
Subject:      qvtne303.zip

I downloaded qvtne303.zip from cica yesterday and when I unzipped it using
wizunzip for windows it gave me the error-- missing file signature header
I downloaded this file as BINARY. Has anyone had any problems with this
program. I appreciate any help.
Thanks!
Edward Gomez
==============================================================================
| A Bad Day Windsurfing is              Edward J. Gomez                      |
|      |\ Better than a Good		Computer Science                     |
|      | \ Day at Work!!		Florida International University     |
|      |  \                                                                  |
|      |   \	I SURVIVED		12666106V@SERVAX.FIU.EDU             |
|      |=\O/\	HURRICANE		EDG@CYBERNET.CSE.FAU.EDU             |
|      |__|__\	ANDREW!!		EGOMEZ@NYX.CS.DU.EDU                 |
|      | / \	 			---------------------------------    |
|   `---------				The views represented here are my    |
| Live to Shred!			own and not of the University.       |
|						                             |
==============================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:         UK.AC.LIV.UXB; 20 NOV 92  8:20:23 GMT
X-Mailer:    ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 08:22:34 GMT
From:         "Mr. R. Coates" <roysan@UXB.LIV.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: Unable to Ctrl-Alt-Del

>
>
> I hard rebooted and came back, my files were not there!

If the machine has a decent sized disk cache, changes may not have actually
been stored on the disk when you hard-reboot. Try saving the files, doing
a couple of dir's ro a chkdsk or something to flush the cache buffer bfore
rebooting.


--

Roy.


==============================================================================
                                  Roy Coates
                   Dept of Mech Eng. Liverpool University
                       P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX

roysan@uxb.liverpool.ac.uk    Tel: 051-794-4862             Fax: 051-794-4848
=============================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 13:16:39 EDT
From:         Craig Neimanis <R3CEN@AKRONVM.BITNET>
Subject: Re: S. O. S. new virus

It sounds like a variant of STONED .... we had something similar a few weeks
ago here and it slipped under F-Prot.  Only Central Point Anti-Virus cleaned
it off (we use it and windows).

                                 Good Luck.   Craig.  U of A
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
From: pmh2962@tamsun.tamu.edu (Pat Hayes)
Subject: Re: Winqvtnet: NEW NAME! QVTNE303.ZIP
Organization: Meteorology, TAMU, CS, TX
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 20:53:30 GMT

David M Stokes writes:
>>        Has anyone out there seen the new winqvt?  I have heard about it,
>>Doug Williams   (dwilliams@vax86.liunet.edu)
>
>Doug,
>As far as I know the authors of winqvtnet are in the process of fixing some 
>rather nasty bugs.. It was availble at WUarch, but was recalled.  It will be
>available in a few days under the name WINQVT30.zip
>Dave 
------------
Dave, Doug, and others:  I got mine from ftp.cica, try this:

	/pub/pc/win3/uploads/qvtne303.zip

Great program -- but you have to re-invent the new setup files. Good luck!


-- 
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pat Hayes, Meteorology, Texas A&M University...<whoop!>...phayes@tamu.edu 
O&M 1008, TAMU, CS, TX 77843-3150....days:(409)845-1680 fax:(409)845-6331 
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: IUPUI Student Activities Office (317) 274-3931
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:07:25 EST
From:         "NATHAN BRINDLE" <NBRINDLE@INDYCMS.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: MS Access database
              16 Nov 1992 14:36:10 -0500 from <jezsik@PX4.STFX.C A>

Well, I don't know about the offer <you> got, but Access can be had via
a special deal for $99 if you own Windows 3.1.  I received a Microsoft
"Focus on Microsoft Windows" featureing Win for Workgroups about 2 weeks
ago with WFWg for $69 (as many copies as you want) and Access for $99
(again, as many copies as you want).

Regards,
-----------------------------------------------------BITNET:  NBRINDLE@INDYCMS
Nathan C. Brindle, Student Activities Office
Staff Advisor, ALPHA PHI OMEGA, TAU OMICRON CHAPTER
Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis
Internet:  NBRINDLE@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU
                                     * * *
                       DON'T BLAME ME, I VOTED FOR PEROT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Posted-Date:  22 Nov 92 16:10 EST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:08:00 EST
From:         Vince Scarafino <Scarafino@MULTICS-A.PMS.FORD.COM>

 >Date:  19 November 1992 13:43 est
 >From:  Howard Blakesley <HBLAKE%NNOMED.BITNET at PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU>

 >>
 >> Those prices sound like the beta release of NT.  I've gotten the
 >> "without doc's" option and it has certainly met my expectations.
 >>
 >> Vince
 >
 >How high were your "expectations"? :T

I was expecting an operating system that would be stable enough to
experiment with the new 32 bit environment, and also be able to run some
of the current Windows 3.1 stuff.  I didn't expect it to perform well,
but to be tolerable.  I have a 33 MHz 486 with 12 MB of memory, with an
Adaptec scsi controller and an EISA bus.

It did meet my expectations.  The operating system is exceptionally
stable.  The only time it hangs on me is when I try to shut it down.
Quite often, it fails to put up the message that says it's okay to turn
it off.

My Visual Basic stuff works under NT, although at less than 1/4 of the
speed under native Windows 3.1.

I can't get Quicken for Windows to run under NT.  It get some kind of
protection fault.  I haven't really tried to find out what the problem
is, yet.

The beta version of NT runs reasonable with 12 Meg of memory.  It can
typically keep around 4 Meg of real memory available for immediate use.

All in all, I'm pretty happy.  I'm a little disappointed in the rather
simplistic memory model supported by NT, but you can't have everything.

Vince
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 13:30:00 EST
From:         Michael Gordon <GORDONM@DENISON.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Stealth compatible monitors?

>  Does anyone know what a NEX 3D is capable of?  I have a 3D and
>had nothing but trouble when I tried to install my Diamond
>Stealth card.  I called tech support a few times, but it didn't
>help.  It has been almost a year now, the card is sitting at
>home in its box still.  I can't remeber the problems I had,
>I think it kept locking up when I started windows, or I could
>start windows but Pagemaker would lock, something like that.
>Maybe I can trade it in for and ATI or one of those other boards?
>
        There are a couple of people around here running the NEC 3D and the
Diamond Stealth card together, with little if any problems. It can be done....

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  20-NOV-1992 13:29:51
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU