HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nathan engle <nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: Rush SmokeD Pot (was Re: Rush Smokes Pot)
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 13:06:10 -0500

In article <1992Apr5.011718.11442@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> 
sschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Susan E Schudt) writes:
>All you pot smokers out there - isn't it pretty impossible to get a buzz (and 
>know whether you like it or not) if you don't inhale or ingest the drug 
>somehow?

    Personal confession time here; yes you're right that it's impossible
to get high without ingesting the drug. However, in my case and in the
experience of many others I knew, I found that I didn't really get high
the first time I smoked. Therefore, even if a person did experiment one 
time, then that might not be a good enough sample on which to base a 
decision. (I *have* admitted before that I did stupid things as a
teenager, so this revelation shouldn't shock anyone).

    I would say, though, that it's entirely possible that people could
go through the motions (less inhaling), and decide that the act of
smoking pot didn't make them look as cool as they thought it would. So
it could be something other than the "buzz" which Clinton decided he 
didn't like.

    As far as Clinton is concerned, I can't really believe that a guy
with his scandalous "hands-on" reputation where women are concerned
would go to the trouble of putting a joint in his mouth without going
for the full experience and breathing deeply. To me, the most impressive 
demonstration of good judgement would be to give something a real try, 
and then decide that it's dumb even if you find that you *do* like it.

-- 
Nathan Engle             Software Juggler
Indiana University       Dept of Psychology
nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: em@nynexst.com (Edward Man)
Subject: Re: White House Sleeping Arrangements
Organization: Nynex Science and Technology
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 14:41:20 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.142058.27836@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> nathan engle <nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu> writes:
>In article <1992Apr13.173338.29068@nynexst.com> em@nynexst.com 
>(Edward Man) writes:
>>In article <44@milestn.UUCP> marc@milestn.UUCP (Marc Rassbach) writes:
>>>Again Ed, Why does Bill's sexual habbits matter?
>>
>>Does it make any difference to you if Slick Willy admits that Geniffer
>>Flowers was his mistress, and still is? Furthermore, he's 5 other
>>mistresses in five different states. He has no intention to stop
>>these relationships. Hilary, Gennifer, and all of the other 5 women
>>will all move into the White House. (There's plenty of room, don't
>>worry.) How do you feel about that? Will you still vote for him?
>
>    Oh come on now... Willy doesn't have these other 5 women living with
>him now does he? Why should he have them move in at the White House? He'll
>probably park them in a Georgetown condo instead. He may be slick but
>he's not stupid.

Come on, I was exergerating. Besides, if Slick's "sexual habbit" really
doesn't matter, what difference does it make? I was simply trying
to show that it really DOES matter. I thought you'd know what I meant!
I am really disappointed. So, does it matter? For those of you who
said "No" before, what do you think NOW?

Ed
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: alex@umbc4.umbc.edu (Alex S. Crain)
Subject: That little itty bitty march
Organization: University of Maryland Baltimore Campus, Academic Computing Services
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 14:53:15 GMT

	I was wondering how Rush would handle the pro-choice march,
but I have to admit that I was surprised that he would write it off so
easily.  Is it my imagination, or has Rush polarized in response to
the election?  It seems like he would have waffled a bit more last
year, like his "pro choice, hoping the choice was life" stance.

	On a related topic, can we agree that Rush is Pro-Life now? I
don't think that he actually said that he supported laws banning
abortion, but he was sure putting a spin on the rally. I was impressed
that he could call a half a million people "totally irrelevant", and
still insist that the marchers were just fringe wackos (Maybe he's
right, but it seems like there are enough of them now to drop the
'fringe' label).

	So what do the dittoheads think? Do you think that 500,000
people gathered in one place for one reason is a fringe group? Is it
possible that Rush no longer speaks for America, and is now just a
toady to the Republican party? Were half the marchers really lesbians
(Thats an awful lot of lesbians), and if so, does it indicate that the
gay community has become a significant force in this country?

	The big question in my mind, though, is this: If 500,000
people is still insignificant, how many people does it take to be a
representative population? Would 5 million be enough (thats 2% of the
US population)? 2 million, 1 million? Where exactly is that line,
anyway?

-- 
#################################		           :alex.
#Disclaimer: Anyone who agrees  #                 Systems Programmer
#with me deserves what they get.#    University of Maryland Baltimore County
#################################	    alex@umbc3.umbc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: st910858@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
Subject: Re: That little itty bitty march
Reply-To: st910858@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 21:20:06 GMT

>>Even George Bush was a Pro-Choice Republican before he flip-flopped to
>>appease the religious right and maintain the Reagan legacy.

>OK, you've indicated all the Dem-o'-rats are wrong and some of
>the Republicans are wrong. What is your point? Just because more
>people are wrong than right, that doesn't make it right. (Think
>about it.)

	By golly Ed, that's good thinkin' - right on.
                                               -Pat Conway
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:1197 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1515
From: jprice@eecs.cs.pdx.edu (James Price)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Does Rush read or post to these groups?
Date: 16 Apr 92 00:37:16 GMT
Organization: Portland State University, Portland, OR


 
   Well, does he? Anyone know? He is quite an interestig character...

James
Net: jprice@jove.cs.pdx.edu       "Justice is incidental to law and order."
Globe: 45 31 25 N 122 40 30 W                          - J. Edgar Hoover
Unity not uniformity | NBC = GE   "Reading musses up my mind." - Henry Ford
From: st910858@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: That little itty bitty march
Date: 9 Apr 92 03:39:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Apr9.033938.13844
Reply-To: st910858@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University

>So what do the dittoheads think? Do you think that 500,000
>people gathered in one place for one reason is a fringe group? Is it
>possible that Rush no longer speaks for America, and is now just a
>toady to the Republican party? Were half the marchers really lesbians
>(Thats an awful lot of lesbians), and if so, does it indicate that the
>gay community has become a significant force in this country?

>The big question in my mind, though, is this: If 500,000
>people is still insignificant, how many people does it take to be a
>representative population? Would 5 million be enough (thats 2% of the
>US population)? 2 million, 1 million? Where exactly is that line, anyway?

	No, you definitely have a point here Alex.  If 500,000 people were at
that march, we can also assume that there were many more who (for whatever
reasons) didn't show up but still support the cause.  I think we can drop 
the "fringe" nomenclature.  
	Of course I'll go to my grave denying that Rush would serve as toady to
anyone, but I'm also a tad surprised that he would blow 500,000 folks off
as easily as you say.  Perhaps he considers the pro-choice ludicrous because 
of the incredible success it has had in talking people into having abortions
and fostering the mentality that there's always abortion to fall back on.
Indeed, I'm guilty of the same attitude, I think that an abortion rate in 
the U.S. that's higher than most third-world nations' is quite unsettling
if not downright disturbing.  There may be a question of choice, but it 
appears as if a little outside influence was necessary to get the statistics 
as high as they are.
	
	It is very possible (though I don't know how probable) that half of the
marchers were lesbians.  And yes gays are a significant group in this country
-I'm not going to deny that fact while I live on a campus where the largest,
undergraduate organization is the gays, lesbians, bi's community -- but I 
will deplore it.  That said, what is the point here, Alex?  Where is the
startling revelation which you're trying to point up?

	As far as where to draw the line with regards to percentages, you tell
me. Is 2% (5 million) or one out of every 50 people to be considered a major
group or political party?  Not to my way of thinking.  True, the show of 
political power and organization in Washington was impressive, but it was 
not a majority and even if it had been 5 million people, it would not have
been a significantly large minority.  So once again, what's the point?
And what do you mean when you use the term representative population?

	Like Rush, I don't see the need to get really excited about the event
as a representation of a significant portion of the population, what other 
reason is there to get excited?
--------------------------------------Patrick S. Conway
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: alex@umbc4.umbc.edu (Alex S. Crain)
Subject: Re: What he said (was: That little itty bitty march
Organization: University of Maryland Baltimore Campus, Academic Computing Services
Distribution: usa,local
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 13:20:15 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.212345.10574@nynexst.com> em@nynexst.com (Edward Man) writes:

>That's exactly what I said, that's exactly what I meant, and that's
>exactly my point! I said it in 2 sentences, 3 lines, 27 words, or 171
>characters, instead of 4 sentences, 7 lines, 81 words, and 458
>characters. 8-) What's your problem?

	Oh. Well, never mind then.

-- 
#################################		           :alex.
#Disclaimer: Anyone who agrees  #                 Systems Programmer
#with me deserves what they get.#    University of Maryland Baltimore County
#################################	    alex@umbc3.umbc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: em@nynexst.com (Edward Man)
Subject: Re: That little itty bitty march
Organization: Nynex Science and Technology
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 14:53:05 GMT

In article <29EA278D.5129@ics.uci.edu> bvickers@ics.uci.edu (Brett J. Vickers) writes:
>Well, the Gallup Reports usually address this issue, asking Americans
>whether they agree with abortion in certain special instances: abortion
>as a means of birth control, abortion for sex selection, etc.
>You will find the agreeing percentage of respondents diminishing
>when you add these twists.  Not surprising.  But my original point
>was that most Americans don't want to see abortion become illegal.
>I am not sure if the Gallup Report has ever specifically asked Americans
>how they would feel about the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade,
>but I will check to see.

Right, "Americans" don't want to see abortion illegal. We also don't
want to see it abused like what you call "Pro-choice" people want,
which is abortion on demand. You've presented and supported one side
of the agument. But I've presented the bigger picture by showing
both (or all three sides). Like I said, I am with the majority and
standing in the middle. I don't want you people on both extremes
"mispresent/misrepresent" my position. I want my position and the
position of the majority be heard.

>You can continue to be insulting and self-righteous, but you only make
>your argument look weaker.

If presenting the "bigger" picture is self-righteous, so be it.

>I have yet to hear Al Gore say anything "wacko" concerning the
>environment.  I have heard Rush Limbaugh say many wacko things
>concerning the environment, however.

Write to ABC TV (or Journal Graphics) and ask for a transcript
of NightLine on the show including Al Gore and Rush Limbaugh on
the environment. If you think Al Gore and many other government
officials don't listen to the environmentalist wackos, think
again.

Ed
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: suo@cae.wisc.edu (Franklin Suo)
Subject: Re: That little itty bitty march
Organization: College of Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison
Date: 10 Apr 92 10:56:35 CDT
Originator: suo@sun-25.cae.wisc.edu


In article <1992Apr8.145315.25196@umbc3.umbc.edu>, alex@umbc4.umbc.edu (Alex S. Crain) writes:
|> 
|> 
|> 	The big question in my mind, though, is this: If 500,000
|> people is still insignificant, how many people does it take to be a
|> representative population? Would 5 million be enough (thats 2% of the
|> US population)? 2 million, 1 million? Where exactly is that line,
|> anyway?

Well, we "elitist" science types like to put the value at 5%. But according to
the Grand Liberal Conspiracy, all scientists consider abortion rights
significant, so it looks like the cutoff for statistical significance will
have to be revised to 0.2% :-)

|> 
|> -- 
|> #################################		           :alex.
|> #Disclaimer: Anyone who agrees  #                 Systems Programmer
|> #with me deserves what they get.#    University of Maryland Baltimore County
|> #################################	    alex@umbc3.umbc.edu


"America the Beautiful, land of the free,
Don't change the words to Land of Hypocricy"		Frank Suo
--Anthrax--						suo@cae.wisc.edu

Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: alex@umbc4.umbc.edu (Alex S. Crain)
Subject: Re: That little itty bitty march
Organization: University of Maryland Baltimore Campus, Academic Computing Services
Distribution: usa,local
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 20:09:28 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.182904.8860@nynexst.com> em@nynexst.com (Edward Man) writes:

>I thought that's what I said?! If the court decided abortion is
>constitutionally illegal, then no law can be passed to "legalize" it.
>Constitutional amendment is required.

	You're still missing the point. The court could, if it wanted,
uphold a law that made abortion illegal, but it cannot decide that abortion
is illegal. IF congress passed a law making abortion illegal, and IF the
supreme court upheld the law, ONLY THEN could no law be passed to legalize it.
In fact, if congress passed such a law, the supreme court would probably
have to throw it out anyway, for the same reason that it will presumably
overturn roe-v-wade.


-- 
#################################		           :alex.
#Disclaimer: Anyone who agrees  #                 Systems Programmer
#with me deserves what they get.#    University of Maryland Baltimore County
#################################	    alex@umbc3.umbc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview,comp.windows.open-look
From: sinkwitz@ifi.unizh.ch (Rainer Sinkwitz)
Subject: Re: help with making a popup disapear
Organization: University of Zurich, Department of Computer Science
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 11:21:38 GMT


In article <DAVIDD.92Apr15103924@wimpie.noaapmel.gov>, davidd@noaapmel.gov (David Doll) writes:
> 
> System: Sparc 2, SunOS 4.1.1, Sun ANSI C, Xview toolkit, guide3.0
> 
> Problem: I can't seem to make a popup go away when a button on it has
> been pushed...On page 66 of O'Reilly Xview prog manual, it talks about
> setting XV_SHOW to false. I tried that but it doesn't work. I must be
> missing something right in front of me, could someone point out how to
> do this...Below is code from guide creating the button and the code
> for it. Thansk very much.
> 
I did a sample with Guide 3.0 in 3 minutes entirely with 
connections and no C-coding. It works fine. 
I append my GIL file below. (decode with uudecode, uncompress)

begin 644 test.G.Z
M'YV0.XXD8=)BA@(4!Q4DT$$G#YPR(")*G$AQH@XX;^#4@=/B3AHW9-[<4:C#
M39@V$"NJI(A1(YP8)$6Z*2-GI4T0;M*P(>F1#!TT-U?&D"&#))HR:<Z@H1.T
M8@P8.4B*"3-FS1DY;^J ;#'F#9LW-2N*$$'2#-@R5[-N[?HU+,6Q)-F$$5.&
M35.Q4#)N!''E8\@[9!?*I<NF1<.'=W7,H2/GXQF2']/021.F\.(P=%*NU/'1
M3IHY:<2P*4-R#AJ1+<R^R>S69LZ="^64 :UG[NB[.'62A/-Q)AG<$E^3##FS
M!9HP($>W5BE\81D[9=S0,8Z<C/*;S774F4.S!1G,87"C2$&2ZN0W;N8 !S%>
M 7F$"P]K7J^CJW2LA</(#D/2),KU$MG'F%=S%+603#0!"$)+&\&TT%%LP*$@
M"' MA,>$$L% 4AX81J3A0CW]I.!0!NIP5%)+ ?A45 M-555:6I'!E5=@J52A
M#F;)!N-:-"X7T8V13599"Y=E=I,.GH$F&FD+F8::&&"1D6!0V:'D1AT39O=<
M=-,=E]R4*V6W77??T1'>7>TM9%X:Z*D'7'OOD23?A#J@-,<<89S!9$DGS0><
MG7CJZ: ."/K8E(#X%6A471(J>..%'<Y0(H>1EA@B4 #:\*&)2"G%U'HQ&+10
MCFAA%>.,;=D8F Z#U>5H$[,%6L:JK18V9U.*,>987'/5U0*4;/S6%!V0Y22D
M968::9,.:T)'TI;24?>EH<'IMM"8<G@'GGCDJ3G&>>FM!V="\3GD)VXZ3,5=
M1WZ)U%^?$WH$DDB#%JI@=I>.>,,-BZ+X*7 WX" 555:9RF.J8JU*ZHXRLE5C
MPKP2YJ@087#'5[N 1>SKK4'EVI@;CRT4)&7(8G:N11E%5]II=Z3VQFI@VD1L
M;+.E4=N2N,W,F7VIZ72RJI#Q7.M=0/+<1L5K]'S;2C="VV5UU[EFK7;<95OF
MF4VER>RW;(;[)GEQEHN8@O6A-V!^^[W[GX*($ECO'3-1>Y.\?PT*8:, /MHA
M")M2BN&F^:JX;[^> ACPP"\:W'"/0(]Z%L.H/OS6JB,/6>3/$2'Y66BCK?QD
ME#&'.;656-X[M=/26A<Z16)6K:V9W);'=9OB@DTN0^;2*48==-"!GMJ8W\0@
M'#'!O?JA9B=J-Z,3ZMUA##9LN+? (*;A$Z;KT< BI_ZJN+U]ET4;.'-3[]X[
M>H;EWK$;8!T-&XZ/*QZYH3<.G3=&&]':JZWJ=[S8QR'CC+%(1J1D!6]KDW'6
M0DB7I:FQ;S)FR$/JHD:^]Z'.2ZJ36V[>AZW782TH6EL3[=ZDD 3 9U18:<.$
M4$ W>BU(+W#H%HB.XH85.F$U:8@@"&3(D#=T" 7#BP$/S:"5V;GA"QQ3"=5H
M\@4IF>$C92!#"9DEAS,@L7]9XZ$(:RBN*;!,AMVR'7QP-S8 I8MWOG,#\";4
MDK^H\4#&T^!*VL:&.2PO0LU;%:0P!#WI=8@&@+.>B Q7 \*E"%3?:Y.9Q"=(
M[%4D.^9+8_K*N"SVR<%]98F?6A:'L,EIS"[WRX@;]4>8209/(A[;E<@&:#D#
M'JE9>V*@Z=[WP!Q*$(,4?.3IH!,M7!ZO6AQTW=5BYRUPN4D\)3PACE*XPA;>
M(08OA(,;>7@'&MH0ASKDH>]^&,0A%A%<5Z1D198HAR:6X8F^F:)^K)A$$&K1
.B !" 1*L5P8P*L1VY 'D
 
end


-- 

oooooo     ooo o  
 $    $   $   "$  Rainer Sinkwitz, Multimedia Lab        sinkwitz@ifi.unizh.ch
 $oooo"   "$ooo   University of Zurich, Switzerland       VOICE +41-1-257-4346
From: denault@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Tony Denault)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
Subject: Need help with TTYs
Date: 7 Apr 92 00:38:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Apr7.003835.17859
Organization: Institute for Astronomy, Hawaii

Help! I'm seeing strange behavior with TTY's!

I'm writing an application with two tty windows. They are used to
report various types of status. I create them by:

   status_tty = (Tty) xv_create( Base_frame, TTY,
      TTY_ARGV,                TTY_ARGV_DO_NOT_FORK,
           .
           .
           .

   dofile_tty = (Tty) xv_create( dofile_frame, TTY,
		TTY_ARGV,                TTY_ARGV_DO_NOT_FORK,
           .
           .
           .

Through out my application I output to the tty by: 

   ttysw_output( status_tty, buf, strlen(buf));
           .
           .
   ttysw_output( dofile_tty, buf, strlen(buf));

ALL the text is print on the LAST tty which was created.
In the above example, the output for status_tty and 
dofile_tty gets printed on the dofile_tty.

If I create status_tty after dofile_tty, then all the
output appears in status_tty.

Is this an xview bug? Or am I doing something wrong
with the ttys?

I'm using Openwindow version 3 & the XView tookkit.

Thanks,

Tony Denault

--
/------------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Tony Denault, Institute for Astronomy,  | denault@uhifa.ifa.hawaii.edu |
| 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96789 |               (808) 956-8101 |
\------------------------------------------------------------------------/
From: ccav27@ccsun.strath.ac.uk ( Y.Chen)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
Subject: Re: drag-n-drop under ow3.0
Keywords: drag n drop
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:42:56 GMT
Organization: Strathclyde University

In article <1992Apr13.065526.20630@cc.uow.edu.au>, g8524394@cc.uow.edu.au (David John Atkinson) writes:
|> 
|> I wrote a little program under ow2.0 to print out files dropped into it's 
|> window using my chosen format. This worked fine with drag-n-drop giving
|> me the file name. Now that I am using ow3.0 I have found that drag-n-drop
|> has changed and I no longer get the file name but the contents of the
|> file from "file manager". I can use this but would prefer to get the
|> filename instead. Is there anyway of getting the filename from the file 
|> managers drag-n-drop? I don't have any programming manuals and am 
|> exclusively using the demo examples.
|> 





I am using the OW3.0 Drag-n-Drop and am getting the file names from the filemgr 

fine.  The filename comes from the drop_info->filename.   So I suppose you
should get the same thing too. 



Charles
From: rickg@eng.sun.com (Richard Goldstein)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
Subject: Re: Notifier & RPC
Date: 6 Apr 92 15:43:05 GMT
Reply-To: rickg@eng.sun.com
Organization: SunSoft, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: nheeghee
In-reply-to: mercurio@sdsc.edu's message of 3 Apr 92 20:12:58 GMT



   From: mercurio@sdsc.edu (Phil Mercurio)
   Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
   Date: 3 Apr 92 20:12:58 GMT
   Organization: San Diego Supercomputer Center @UCSD.

   We need to do remote procedure calls to applications written with
   XView.  Does anyone know how well the Notifier and RPC get along?
   After looking thru the Notifier source, it appears that calling

	   notify_enable_rpc_svc(TRUE)

   will add the RPC-related file descriptors to the Notifier's select()
   call.  We couldn't find notify_enable_rpc_svc() in the documentation.
   Is this all that is necessary to make RPC work?  Has anyone
   tried this? 


documentation for the notify_enable_rpc_svc() is included in the
new XVPM V3 reprints.  also, ORA's "Power Programming in RPC" has
a good section on using this.

as far as if this call will "make RPC work" may depend on what your
doing.  what notify_enable_rpc_svc() is intended for is to replace
a call to svc_run() which is a blocking loop and, consequently, 
wouldn't otherwise get along with xv_main_loop().


<<rick

--

---------------------------------------------------------

	Richard M. Goldstein 
	Window Systems Technology Group
	SunSoft, Inc.

	"You've got to be Hardy to rest on your Laurels"
			-unknown

---------------------------------------------------------
From: whko@fs1-dsp.oce.nl (Wil Koenen)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
Subject: Re: Images and XVIEW
Date: 15 Apr 92 14:35:46 GMT
Organization: OCE Nederland B.V.

>CanvasRepaintProc(canvas,pw,display,xwin,xrects)
>Canvas         canvas;
>Xv_Window      pw;
>Display        *display;
>Window         xwin;
>Xv_xrectlist    *xrects;
>
>
>and this is my call to XPUTIMAGE:-
>
>
>XPutImage(display,xwin,wingc,xImage,0,0,0,0,xImage->width,xImage->height);
>
> Can you see anything wrong ????
>
>              cheers JK.

The clip_mask of the GC is possibly wrong. A fast way to check this:

	GC	gc=XCreateGC(display,xwin,(unsigned long)0, (XGCValues *)NULL);

This creates a default GC with proper clip_mask.
Then:

	XPutImage(display,xwin,gc,xImage,0,0,0,0,xImage->width,xImage->height);
	XFreeGC(display,gc);

B.t.w. to avoid net-traffic you may want to keep the image data on the
server side. This can be done as follows:
- create a pixmap
- copy Ximage to pixmap and destroy Ximage
- repaint by copying from pixmap into paintwindow


      ###########################################################
      #  This note does not necessarily represent the position  #
      #     of Oce-Nederland B.V. Therefore no liability or     #
      #      responsibility for whatever will be accepted.      #
      ###########################################################
From: ja_king@csd.brispoly.ac.uk (JA King)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
Subject: Images and XVIEW
Date: 14 Apr 92 13:30:48 GMT
Reply-To: ja_king@csd.bristol-poly.ac.uk
Organization: Bristol Polytechnic (The Magic Roundabout)


 How do you display an image in a canvas ? I open a Canvas, load an image from file,
 create Ximage, assign a Canvas repaint procedure to the canvas and use the canvas 
 repaint procedure to assign the Ximage to the canvas with XPUTIMAGE(usual rubish +
 Ximage)

                      Any Clues ???

                         cheers JK
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview