HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: galletti@husc10.harvard.edu (Arturo Galletti)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Origins of Cable and Stryfe revealed in X-Force #17
Date: 10 Nov 92 01:27:20 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

>>>Sinister is a red herring.  He probably *was* going to be Nathan.  (We
>>>actually lucked out!)  They'll probably make him a High Lord now.  Thus,
>>>Sinister's interest in Scott makes as much sense as Gideon's interest in
>>>Sunspot.  Perhaps Scott was also a suspected High Lord.
>>>
>> Hey!  Now there's a decent theory!!
>
>Yeah, maybe all of the original X-Men are High Lords. That would
>explain why they haven't aged for almost thiry years. Well, maybe that
>is stretching the "High Lord" thing a bit, but I think Marvel has
>created too many already. If there is such a thing as a High Lord,
>should there not only be a few, such as four or five? Pretty soon,
>we'll have a comic entitled "High Lords". It will be a
>three-strike-force team of High Lords who battle Asgardian Gods for
>control of the Multiverse and all of its dimensions and timelines.
>Then there will be a character called "God" who has the ultimate
>power...
 
Does anyone else besides me recall the chosen from the old Apocalypse
storylines?The twelve? Or maybe there is an x-man who is a highlord and
he or she turns out to be the traitor.Hmmmmmm........
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: lawrence@ctron.com (Gary S. St. Lawrence)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: X-Men: The MovieOkay, since there's been plenty of talk about  the new X-Men animated
Date: 5 Nov 92 18:36:11 GMT
Reply-To: lawrence@olympus.ctron.com (Gary S. St. Lawrence)
Organization: Cabletron Systems INc.

Clint Eastwood as Wolverine?!?!?!? Are you f***ed in the head?
First of all, take a look at Clint these days, he's gaunt, showing his
age and would not do a comic book movie. Also, there's the slightly
difficult problem of the fact that Clint is 6'3" and Wolverine is 
supposed to be about 5'6" (remember the term "runt"?)

Why should we have an entire cast of major league stars anyway? Because
Tim Burton set a precedent? Oh yeah, and wasn't Batman Returns just a 
spectacular representation of what happens when Tim Burton gets behind
a project? That flick S-U-C-K-E-D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why not just have one or two major players? I like Keanu Reeves as Gambit
and Naomi Campbell as Storm.
But if you're looking for a SMALL, muscular body builder to play Logan,
how about Francu Columbo - Arnold's old posing partner? He's in his
mid to late 40s, built like a tank, smokes cigars and has one hell of
a devlish grin!

The other problem with having a dozen big name stars is budget. Too much
spent of actors' salaries means less for SFX, production and post-
production, which would almost guarantee us something in the outcome
that might be about as good as the Captain America movie! Someone should
have shielded us from THAT!!!!

						Saint.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: stevenra@feserve.cc.purdue.edu (Alex Stevens)
Subject: Re: The X-Men Movie Cast (Repost from racm)
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 02:46:41 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.053824.29830@news.columbia.edu> jmw20@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Joshua Michael Wolf) writes:
>Jean Grey's a toughie.  How about Nicolette Sheridan (from Dead Calm and Days
>of Thunder)?

	Actually, her name's Nicole Kidman, Mr. Cruise's wife.  Anyway,
she's cute and all, I don't know if she'd fit the part.  Actually, she 
was impressive in Dead Calm, though....she'd have to die her hair red again
(tha fake red, like Tawny Kitaen's...)

Alex
stevenra@feserve.cc.purdue.edu


Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: bammerla@cs.ruu.nl (Boris Ammerlaan)
Subject: Re: The Beast
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 11:30:12 GMT
Organization: Utrecht University, Dept. of Computer Science

In <1dsliqINNm85@male.EBay.Sun.COM> zombie@redeye.EBay.Sun.COM (zombie) writes:


>Hello,
>
>  I have a question about The Beast.  I have only been reading comics
>again for about a year.  I picked up the X-Factor Annual #1 (1986)
>and The Beast is totally different.  Currently, he is blue and 
>has *hair*.  In the annual, he is caucasion (sp?) and has no more
>hair than Wolverine.  What's the story here?  What happened to him?
>
>Thanks.
>
>zombie
>
>--
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
><>			zombie@redeye.ebay.sun.com  		    <>
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Originally, he was caucasion. Then, trying to find the x-factor that makes
mutants mutants, he got furry in an accident.
In X-Factor #3 he was made caucasian again by a mad scientist.
In X-Factor #34, about 17 (?) issues after Pestilence's touch, he got furry
agin.

		Boris Ammerlaan

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: pendy@ais.org (Paul Hohn)
Subject: Re: The X-Men Movie Cast (Repost from racm)
Organization: UMCC
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 10:09:37 GMT

In article <BxBpzK.G29@matilda.vut.edu.au> jed@matilda.vut.edu.au (Jed Bowtell) writes:
>jmw20@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Joshua Michael Wolf) writes:
>
>>Psylocke: Sharon Stone.  Definitely.
>
>Just one problem. Psylocke has an Asian appearance. The
>body definately fits the bill though. I think Psylocke

Naw, let's cast Sharon Stone as the White Queen and Tia Carrere as Psylocke.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: cwelsh@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Craig Welsh  )
Subject: Re: You Have Been Warned (Was Re: FUTURE REDUX)
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 19:30:48 GMT

In article <BxMEyI.Anq@ns1.nodak.edu> dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu (David Henry) writes:
>Boy, I'm away from the net for two days and all sort of silliness occurs.
>*sigh*. It is, I guess, to be expected. However, I do have one word of
>advice:
>
>In article #whocares wReam writes:
>>	Of course not!  We're all one big family here ...
>>       Lets all join hands and sing!
>>
>>	"EVERYTHING IS BEAUTIFUL! IN IT'S OWN WAY..."
>
>Family or no, I shot and ate the last guy who tried singing that to me.
>Sold the remains to Oscar Meyer, and have been enjoying my bologna sandwiches
>even more now...
>
>"My bologna has a first name..."
>
David, you have just earned my respect. This was truly a comment gross
beyond any real need. Aside from being gross, disgusting and generally
disturbing it was also brilliant. Made my day.

Boy, I am in a bad mood today. It's great.

-Craig
From: lazarus@goldwing.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: X-men: TAS
Date: 9 Nov 1992 00:27:34 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: goldwing.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <1992Nov8.202825.2797@scott.skidmore.edu>, jholstei@scott.skidmore.edu (jeremy holstein) writes:
>One, the scale of the sentinals kept on changing.  Sometimes Wolverine
>appeared to be half as tall as a Sentinal.

They come in assorted sizes?  Maybe even flavours as well, but I wouldn't
want to taste one...

>Also, the room full of Bad-guys that were the conclusion of the first
>episode were completely different.  Different uniforms, different
>arrangement...

Well, the FIRST room full of Bad-guys were union, and guaranteed at LEAST
a fifteen minute coffee break... THAT's half of the programme!  These
other guys we saw were second-rate scab Bad-guys...   :)

>  The animation has its good points, but it definately leaves alot to
>be desired.  BTAS is spoiling us, I guess.

Not me... I can't stand Batman in general...

>The number of frames per minute should be upped during the credits as well.
>The Opening sequence (which usually is a chance for the animators to show
>off) is jerky and poorly done.

For some reason, I was paying a little closer attention to the opener this
week.  When they show Cyclops, it's reminiscent of his origin... looking
straight up and blasting a crate that's about to fall on top of him (or in
this case, blasting the word "Cyclops" that's inexplicably hovering above
him ;)  ).  There were a couple of other good points about the opening
sequence, but you're right, it CAN be done to look much more attractive.

By the way, I think that I can identify another of the villains in the
opening title sequence... wasn't Pyro running alongside the other baddies?

>  Overall, I'd give X-men a C+ for being a cartoon.

I'd have scored it a LITTLE better than that, but not much.  Hopefully,
since this was just a sneak-preview, that means that the following episodes
have yet to even be made yet... it'll give the creators time to listen
to the critics (US!) and improve their work.

>-- 
>This is my sig file.

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
'Cats - 22, Iowa State - 13  A K-State win on national television... and a win
	that I'm satisfied with!  :)
"I'm confused... did I vote, or did I just buy candy?" -- David Letterman
From: dc@ohm.york.ac.uk (Dave Cullen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: jean, scott, and optic blasts
Date: 13 Nov 92 11:06:51 GMT
Organization: Electronics Department, University of York, UK


 The point of whether or not Cyclops experiences recoil is fairly moot, as in te 130's) he used his optics to propel the X-Men's raft away from the Savage Land. Also, in a later issue with him & Man-Thing against Mephisto, inadvertantly
looking at the ground without his ruby-quartz shades propelled him several feet
in the air, which I don't think was a direct result of the effect of the beams
on the ground itself.
   Dave
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: m1b@rayssd.ssd.ray.com (Barone)
Subject: Re: Brief History of Sentinels [LONG]
Organization: Raytheon Submarine Signal Division, Portsmouth, RI
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:07:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.233056.24158@infonode.ingr.com> wcw@wegl.b24a.ingr.com
(William Wallace) writes:
> 
> Mark II  - Uncanny X-Men #57-59
> 
>    History:   These were by far the most powerful version of the
>               sentinels.  They were both stronger and possesed more
>               independent thought than other models.  The ability to 
>               analyze an opponent and adjust their attack was the 
>               most useful attribute.  For example, they would use steam
>               to counter Icemans cold.

Since Drake's power allows him to freeze the humidity in air around
him, why would an enemy supply him with ammo?  I think an issue of New
Defenders addresses this (their HQ was in the desert).  It would make
more sense to combat Iceman with fire.
-- 
Joe Barone
m1b@rayssd.ssd.ray.com
Occupation: Former historian, now a demon.
From: perl@dwrsun4.UUCP (Robert Perlberg)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: XM:TAS: Animation (was: X-Men TAS new info)
Date: 13 Nov 92 22:00:57 GMT
Organization: Dean Witter Reynolds Inc., New York

In article <BxGF9H.2qy@csugrad.cs.vt.edu>, jchiu@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (James Chiu) writes:
> Hey, at least this series is hundreds of times better in animation
> than that crap animated Batman who looks like Space Ghost.

Hey, I liked Space Ghost.  And I liked that teenage girl.  Especially
when she was chained to that... uh...  oh... uh... never mind.

Robert Perlberg
Dean Witter Reynolds Inc., New York
{murphy | philabs}!dwrsun4!perl
	-- "I am not a language ... I am a free man!"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: stevenra@feserve.cc.purdue.edu (Alex Stevens)
Subject: Re: The X-Men Movie Cast (Repost from racm)
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 23:34:04 GMT

In article <BxBpzK.G29@matilda.vut.edu.au> jed@matilda.vut.edu.au (Jed Bowtell) writes:
>jmw20@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Joshua Michael Wolf) writes:
>
>>Psylocke: Sharon Stone.  Definitely.
>
>Just one problem. Psylocke has an Asian appearance. The

	Did I not read the issues wel enough, or somethings wrong:
Psylocke was Captain Britain's sister or something, VERY white.  Now that
you mentioned Asian, did her tribulation in Japan change her skin?
I always though she just started to get some sun!

Alex
stevenra@feserve.cc.purdue.edu
From: louis@maxwell.Berkeley.EDU (Louis Reash)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re:Captain Universe (was Re: X-men TAS -- More errors?)
Keywords: Marvel
Date: 12 Nov 92 22:11:04 GMT
Reply-To: louis@maxwell.Berkeley.EDU (Louis Reash)
Organization: Ansoft Corporation

Isn't the most current CU a Kree?

I could have swore I saw that some where!
 
(Avengers? WCAvengers? Quasar?)?

But where?  Does anyone remember?

Louis Reash      'It's deja vu all over again' - Unknown
louis@ansoft.com 'The brighter the picture, the darker the negative' 
                   - Batman the Animated Series 'Two-Face'
Disclaimer: My boss doesn't listen to what I say, why should you?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: dlm4731@summa.tamu.edu (MAREK, DAVID LESLIE)
Subject: Re: XMEN:TAS-load of crap
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 19:12:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.180004.290@ms.uky.edu>, uk08745@nx04.mik.uky.edu (randy j yarger) writes...
>In article <11NOV199209514441@zeus.tamu.edu> dlm4731@zeus.tamu.edu (MAREK,  
>DAVID LESLIE) writes:


Sorry people, I developed a severe case of head up ass syndrome(HUAS).  What
I meant to say in my original post was the Storm's eyes were supposed to be
Blue, not brown.  Then to go and compound the error with my followup.  I
guess to punish myself, I'll go kneel in the corner and read Youngblood and
try to understand the story.  

Dave
From: sl859@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: DHENRY! DHENRY@PLAINS.NoDakota.edu DHENRY!
Date: 11 Nov 92 10:51:04 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

>>	Perhaps this is one of those Danglers that needs to be resolved!
>>What secret power does the DHenry hold and who shall possess it in the end!?
>>The whole cosmic balance hangs in order to this catastrophic question...
>>						wReam...
>>P.S.  Or maybe the motivation is even more convoluted!  (I welcome any and all
>>specultation!)
> Any and All????  Ok, how's this...
> Maybe he's one of those would be heroes who doesn't want the responciblity
> that comes with all good natured super-powers.  (Let's call this the
> Dazzler Syndrone)  You know the type:  "But, I don't wanna be a hero!" and
> in the first 12 issues of the mag s/he meets some of the greats, such as 
> the Hulk, the Enchantress (a goddess, no less)  and the ultimate, Galactus!
> But, remember, s/he doesn't want to be a hero!  yeah, right.
> Does this sound theasible?
				
		HEY!  This is a great theory!  (Scav- are you getting all
this!?)  And most feasible.  I suppose then we ought to start watching the LNH
to see if some hero appears under such a guise...

						wReam...

P.S.  MUWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!
From: jwlr@okeeffe.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: xmen.magneto
Keywords: xmen
Date: 10 Nov 92 21:55:12 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

cweir@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Corey Weir) writes:


>          Once again, I come forth to voice my opinion on an obscure and
>unsure topic: the apparent death of Magneto. Even though in the latest
>copy of Avengers, where the Acolyte Scanner tells Lockjaw and the
>housekeeper that Magneto is dead, it appears that Magnus is, indeed,
>dead, I wouldn't bet any money on it. The Master of Magnetism will be up
>to his old tricks, probably as soon as this Executioner's Song garbage
>is over and done with. Magneto is too pivotal and important a character
>to be killed off in such a trivail way. It is foolish to even think that
>he could be dead. But, anyway, this is, as always, just my opinion...

SameOldMarvelTricks Dept:
	Article 432, Section 328, paragraph 8 clearly states:

	Any Comic Book Characters' assertions of another Comic Book Character's
	demise must be taken with a proverbial grain of salt, as the Comic
	Book Character of the First Part may be mistaken as to the fate
	of the Comic Book Character of the Second Part.

Corollary:
	Article 432, Section 328, paragraph 11:
	Omniscient Narrators may be occasionally incorrect with regard
	to any assertion of any Comic Book Character's demise. (Also
	known as the Xavier/Changeling clause.)

>:wq
No thanks, I've got my own.
:wqU2

				James Willer
[any opinions above are already registered with the federal government]
From: v062nm65@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Chris Randall)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: X-Men: The MovieOkay, since there's been plenty of talk about the new X-Men animated
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:47:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <BxDDBJ.L47@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, stevenra@feserve.cc.purdue.edu (Alex Stevens) writes...
>In article <BxBMrt.FoC@matilda.vut.edu.au> jed@matilda.vut.edu.au (Jed Bowtell) writes:
>>How about
>>
>>Wolverine - The Indian tracker type guy from Predator
>	
>	YES!!!!!!!!!!! Someone else remembered him!  I was struggling to 
>remember which movie he was in. Everyone stop reading and watch Predator,
>he may be Native, but he's perfect!!!

I believe his name is Sonny Landham.  Great choice, although I think (asbestos
suit on) that Mel Gibson would make a decent Wolverine.  I think his
personality (see Lethal Weapon I) fits in nicely with Logan's...

Cyclops - Bruce Boxenlitner (sp?)
Collossus - ANYONE but Schwarzenegger!  I love his movies, but he's SOOO 
	    overused these days. (Rumor has him playing Doc Ock in the 
	    Spiderman movie).  If he had any acting ability, maybe Dolph
	    Lungdren...
Nightcrawler - Jean Claude Van Damme, 
		-he's got the accent, the build, the acrobatic ability, 
		 so all we'd need to do is hack off two of his fingers 
		 on each hand...		:)
	     Brandon Lee.
		-again, he's got the ability, and he's got the facial features.
Professor Xavier - I dunno.  If I had my pick of ANYONE, I'd pick Yul Brenner
	(ok, so he's dead!!!) or possibly, a younger Albert Finney
Jean Grey - Geena Davis
Rogue - Annie Potts (Designing Women redhead)
Storm - Iman, Vanessa Williams

Magneto - Rutger Hauer.  Definitely.



my opinions are my own...



Chris
From: mikecap@wpi.WPI.EDU (Michael Vince Caprio Jr)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Paradoxes
Date: 6 Nov 1992 06:16:56 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu


In response to the previous articles:

When I mentioned the concept of "you" this referred to the sum total of all
the particles that you consist of now.  Period.  These particles have always
existed, therefore "you" have always existed.  I'm sure everyone's heard how
particles of Julius Ceasar may be a part of us now... no?  Atoms are not 
generally created or destroyed on this planet under natural conditions.  The
only places that such nuclear reactions take place are on a star, during 
radioactive decay, or in a reactor.  Let's say then that a person could be 
considered one particle, just to simplify matters.  If there is a time 
displacement, this particle must travel into another spatial relationship as
well, thus a situation can occur where two of the same particle exist at the
same time - but here's the kicker - THEY'RE NOT THE SAME!
What this means is, the definition of a particle at any particular junction
relies on its spatial and temporal location (relativity kicks in here), or
more basically, a future self is different from a past self.  If time is
quantized, then a self exists for each quantum of time, since a different
self is created with every passing moment (or more truthfully, a new universe
is created with the self included).  This is what I meant when I made the jump
from quantization to the many-universes theory.  I'm sorry if I sounded vague;
it was unintentional.
I'm really just posting this as a supplement to the Marvel Universe scenarios,
but it's not that much of a coincidence that it sounds like it applies to this
one.  Let me also say that I'm not a professional um, whatever a person is that
discusses this stuff (philosopher, I guess?).  These are just random musings
I've had for a while.  If anybody's interested I can ramble some more, but I 
don't know if this is appropriate for this newsgroup anymore.

My best,

Mike C.
-- 
"1. One Mind there is; but under it two principles contend.       
 2. The Mind lets in the light, then the dark, in interaction; so time is gen-
 erated.  At the end Mind awards victory to the light; time ceases and the Mind
 is complete."        - from _Tractates: Cryptica Scriptura_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: mwbutler@iastate.edu (Michael W Butler)
Subject: Re: The X-Men Movie Cast (Repost from racm)
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 02:45:35 GMT

In article <BxDuBM.J31@ns1.nodak.edu> dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu (David Henry) writes:
>Many Q. People write:
>
>>>>Psylocke: Sharon Stone.  Definitely.
>>>
>>>Just one problem. Psylocke has an Asian appearance. The
>>
>>	Did I not read the issues wel enough, or somethings wrong:
>>Psylocke was Captain Britain's sister or something, VERY white.  Now that
>>you mentioned Asian, did her tribulation in Japan change her skin?
>>I always though she just started to get some sun!
>
>We should be so lucky! No, the Hand transformed Brit Psylocke into Ninja
>Oriental Death-Bunny Psylocke in the Acts of Vengeance storyline in
>Uncanny. Some Lee fan can probably give you the issue #s, it was his first
>storyline on the mutants. Me, I didn't care, at that time... Rogue had
>vanished through the Siege Perilous.
>
>-- 
>David R. Henry 

So what does her voice sound like????

Is it still British, or does she now have a Japanese accent?
Could be important when casting....

Just a thought.
From: pjconley@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Pat J Conley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: RE: X-men movie cast
Date: 10 Nov 1992 13:26:55 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: pjconley@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

	some other things to consider for the movie are

	how will have storm and cyclops on the same team, who leads?

	how will wolverine act towards cyclops, as i recall, wolverine
	really resents being told what to do, especially by cyclops.

	how will angel/archangel act towards wolverine, as i recall
	warren is not too thrilled about the bond between jean and
	logan....it caused fights between them before

	mel gibson is too damn tall and not furry enough

	if you're going to send some nasty villians against the X-men
	my vote is for the hellfire club.  why? simply because you
	can have magneto, the white queen, the black queen, the black
	king, and the black rook, who are IMHO the nastiest villians
	the X-men had to face.  casting is easy for the HC:
		Magneto: rutger hauer
		Emma Frost: madonna
		selene: sharon stone(dye the hair)
		black king: alan rickman(sheriff from robin hood)
		black rook: mel gibson(heck, it's more plausible than
				       him being wolverine)
		and of course a nasty group of mark 4 sentinals

	and one final thing to consider....if you have all these
	big-name stars, how are going to afford to pay for them
	and the special effects and still turn a profit?
	



-- 
   LUM: Oh Darling.....I love you!!!!
   ATARU(being zapped): GIIIIIIIIIIIIIIYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAA!
From: jwlr@okeeffe.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Gyrich's name (was Jean Grey's Non-Codename)
Date: 10 Nov 92 20:10:53 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

jjfink@skcla.monsanto.com writes:

>WRT the animated series... I'd always pronounced Henry Peter Gyrich's last name
>as JIErich (like gyro), not GEERick.  Are there earlier pronounciation
>references? 

'Sfunny, I always thought it was GUY-rick.

					James Willer
[any opinions above are already registered with the federal government]
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: Dave Horlick <drh2@cornell.edu>
Subject: Cable & Stryfe- my Theory
X-Xxdate: Fri, 13 Nov 92 19: 28:00 GMT
Nntp-Posting-User: drh2@cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell University
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d7
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 00:23:11 GMT