HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Re: Rush is bad for our country, NOT!
Date: 15 Oct 92 22:49:58 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, stecher@atlas.socsci.umn.edu (Jack Stecher) writes:

> In article <122460024@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom) writes:
> >In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, stecher@atlas.socsci.umn.edu (Jack Stecher) writes:
> >
> >> Here we have tolerance at its finest.  Perhaps you might stop typing and
> >> instead picked up pom-poms, and composed cheers for Bill Clinton.
> >
> >You might want to practice using consistent verb tenses in your sentences.
> >
> 
> Whoops.  Forgive the obvious typo, netters.
> 

And forgive me for giving in to the urge to be pedantic about 
postings.  It is a fairly reprehensible thing to do.

doug
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Wednesday, 14 Oct 1992 09:45:15 MST
From: <AUTSW@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Quayle Smashes Gore...
 <1992Oct14.025319.22305@news.ysu.edu>

In article <1992Oct14.025319.22305@news.ysu.edu>, ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley
Miller) says:

>>Well, like I thought would happen, Quayle demoloshid Gore in the debate.  It
>>looks like Quayle could be the only thing that might possibly save Bush.
>>
>>Ted K.
>
>I thought so....
>
>All the Bush backers have no grip whatsoever on reality....
>
>[sigh]

Ahhh, I see yet another one falls for the wonderful rhetoric eminating
from Bill Clinton trying to portray George Bush as "out of touch" and "senile".
Explain to me (you who are so "in touch" with reality) how during the Carter
administration, the misery index was hovering above 20% and how after 12
years of Reagan/Bush, it's down to around 10% !?!?!  If you want an economy
like we had during the Carter administration, then I suggest you do vote
for Bill Clinton...
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6740 alt.rush-limbaugh:7237
From: pvanmeur@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Pim van Meurs)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Stuff about Clinton
Date: 13 Oct 92 07:41:51 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <1992Oct13.050240.29059@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
Jokes deleted about Hillary and Bill Clinton
>Perhaps their daughter, if she was smart, would divorce herself from them!!!

Or, even better, your parents, if they had been smarter would have
exercised their at this moment still constitutional right of free choice and 
we would never have had this posting.
.

Pim,
-- 
Pim van Meurs  UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Mail Code A-030  	 UUCP : ...!ucsd!ssurf.ucsd.edu!VANMEURS
UCSD La Jolla  CA 92093  ARPA : VANMEURS@ssurf.ucsd.edu
(619)-458 9729 Home	 Bitnet : VANMEURS%ssurf.ucsd.edu@sdsc
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle)
Subject: Re: Amazing Grates (WAS Re: A Technical Request)
Organization: Psych Department, Indiana University
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 19:23:47 GMT

steven@jaynes ( Steve Novak) writes:
>>    Actually one other thing amazes me as well, and that's the way that 
>>people cross-post stuff like this in every group they can think of. Is 
>>any of this relevant to abortion, guns, conspiracies, Dan Quayle, or Rush 
>>Limbaugh? The only group this thread *really* belongs in is talk.bizarre.

>I'm amazed Nathan didn't remove some of those newsgroups from his reply.

    Well, I guess it was because I had posted similar "anti-cross-posting" 
tirades to a.f.r-l before, and yet we continue to be bombarded with 
irrelevant bovine fecal matter. My conclusion was I had to get my message 
through to the people in the groups that dump this garbage into our beloved 
little a.f.r-l.

>I didn't, 'cause I'm incorrigible, but I *did* set the "Followup" line.

    Yeah, unfortunately my Trumpet DOS newsreader pays no heed to the 
Followup line, nor does it allow the user to specify one; an unfortunate 
shortcoming, but not serious enough to make me give up my "Trumpet".

--
Nathan Engle                        Software Juggler
Psychology Department               Indiana University
nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu      nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 20:29:12 GMT
Subject: Re: GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, rdale@cstp.umkc.edu writes:

> 	The worst in 50 years?  I wish they'd show some figures to
> back this statement up. . .

I would be interested in the data as well.

> 
> >  *    The American people don't want to hear about Bill Clinton's 1969
> >  itinerary, they want to hear about the course America is going to
> 
> 	No, they want Slick Willie to COME CLEAN about it.

Apparently most of them dont' care.  Of course my only source
for this info. is the polls, and we all know that the polls
in america are the evil tools of the liberal media DESPITE
the fact that it was these same polls that showed us that
george bush was going to bean michael dukakis.

> >  who was attending Oslo University.  He met Father McSorley
> >  coincidentally at the Oslo train station, they traveled to the
> 
> 	Not according to Father McSorley.  Now, either Clinton or
> McSorley is lying.  Since Clinton misrepresents his claims and
> has not come clean on any of this other stuff, I believe McSorley.

So do I as a matter of fact.  Many other people may too.  This
has certainly gotten attention in the national media.

> 	You are obviously missing a lot of the picture.  I'm no Bush
> fan.  I voted for Mondale and Dukakis, but Clinton is not desirable.
> The only reason the Democrats like him is because they smell blood.

This is actually TRUE.  In fact, when this race started, the demos
hated BOTH Tsongas and Clinton, because they were outside the
controlling clique and represented a threat to the party as usual.

>  The
> leftists will run roughshod over him if he gets in office.  He will be
> very ineffective, because he won't dare go against the Democrats, and if
> he gives in to the higher taxes and bigger government (as he must), he
> will be straying from his "moderate" stance.

Hard to tell.  This may be the case.

> 
> 	Bush's problem is that he abandoned his conservatism and gave in
> to the liberals, signing the 1990 tax increase.  You remember -- "the
> second largest tax increase in history" -- despite the fact that all
> such bills must originate in Congress (the House), and that it was a
> tax increase which did not improve the economy, yet the Democrats want
> more of the same.

He also pander too much to the people that want to restrict personal
liberty.  I am beginning to lean towards the libertarian position
on this, even though libertarians, as a group, tend to nauseate me.

> 
> 	Part of me hopes Clinton is elected.  He and his cronies will
> surely plunge us deep into economic doo-doo.  It may well spell the
> death of the Democrats, as people will see that they have been played
> for fools, emptying out their wallets and bank accounts to feed an
> increasingly-ravenous government black hole.

Bush would very likely accomplish the same thing anyway.  The two
major parties are incapable of gathering the will to do the 
righ thing.  Bush has demonstrated that he is incapable of actually
accomplishing smaller government.  Wht not vote Libertarian?


doug
> 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: stecher@atlas.socsci.umn.edu (Jack Stecher)
Subject: Re: Rush is bad for our country
Organization: Department of Economics, Univ of Minn
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 20:38:43 GMT

In article <122460024@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom) writes:
>In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, stecher@atlas.socsci.umn.edu (Jack Stecher) writes:
>
>> Here we have tolerance at its finest.  Perhaps you might stop typing and
>> instead picked up pom-poms, and composed cheers for Bill Clinton.
>
>You might want to practice using consistent verb tenses in your sentences.
>

Whoops.  Forgive the obvious typo, netters.

--Jack Stecher
stecher@atlas.socsci.umn.edu
From: griffin@eecae.ee.msu.edu (Danny Griffin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Two down... one to go!
Date: 9 Oct 92 04:33:39 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University

chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:

>the absolutely most paid-attention-to person in the United States of
>America, all around. 

Ah, but will his new successes cause him to be interviewed on Larry King Live?

>The man is a genius. 

Yes.
-- 
Dan Griffin                     Abort the whales with a nuclear handgun.
griffin@egr.msu.edu
From: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Religious rights and responsibilities
Date: 8 Oct 92 21:28:14 GMT
Distribution: world, na, usa
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

In article <1992Oct8.135702.1924@gacvx2.gac.edu> bthomas@dumaine.gac.edu (Barbara L Thomas) writes:

>> Christian principles - isn't that what the inquisition was based on?

[stuff about being offensive deleted]

>No, what I found offensive was your use of the phrase "Christian  
>Priciples" which obviously a concept that you don't understand.

Okay,  then are you sayin the Roman Catholic Church, which based the
inquisition on the Bible, did not base the inquisition on Christian
Principles?    Are you saying that something based on the new testiment
isn't based on Christian Principles?   Where else would you find Christian
Principles?

I guess you are saying that the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church doesn't
understand, or isn't based on, Christian Principles?   I wonder how the
Roman Catholics here feel about that?  Or do they agree that for over
600 years thier Church policy was based on Non-Christian Principles?
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: jcarroll@bach.udel.edu (Royal J Carroll)
Subject: Re: Did I miss something?
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 18:05:41 GMT

In article <3736@eastman.UUCP> dan@ektools.kodak.com (Daniel P. Schaertel) writes:
>
>Why ? because a good portion of the net is comprised of college
>students.  People who haven't had to pay the price that liberalism
>brings.  These people are very idealistic.  So is liberalism.  The
>problem is when you live in the real world you see that the ideas of
>these people don't work.  I used to be somewhat liberal myself, but 14
>years in the work force and a family of 4 has changed the way I look at
>life.  My VALUES are different.  These college students basically are
>only responsible for themselves,(and many of them probably aren't even
>good at that).  They haven't really learned what responsibility is.  And
>that is one of the major difference between liberalism and conservatism.
>

First, not all college students are liberal.  I have been conservative
ever since I was old enough to form my own opinions.

I also resent the tone of your message that implies that because we are
in college, we don't understand the ways of "the real world" nor do we
have the same responsibilities that others have.  I have been in the
workforce and have seen the "real world" in action.  I admit I don't
have several years of experience, but I do have an understanding about
the way the world works.

I also have to rely on my self to provide food, clothes and pay the
utility bills.  

As far as being responsible for others, there are a few of us who have
had to be responsible fo others.  However, I will admit that this is an
experience that many students have not had.

If I have misinterpreted you, I'm sorry.  I resent the characterization
that because I'm a student, I am an idealist without an understanding of
the "ways things work" and no idea of what "real responsibilities" are.

-James

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
If I could only reach you/If I could make you smile
If I could only reach you/That would really be a breakthough
-Queen, "Breakthru"=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=jcarroll@brahms.udel.edu-
From: ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller)
Subject: Re: Rush is bad for our country
Reply-To: ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller)
Organization: St. Elizabeth Hospital, Youngstown, OH
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 05:02:28 GMT


In a previous article, jbuckner@lonestar.utsa.edu (James A. Buckner) says:

>In article <LARRY.92Oct8111459@peak.psl.nmsu.edu> larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way) writes:
>>In article <1992Oct6.131337.27752@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> jbuckner@lonestar.utsa.edu (James A. Buckner) writes:



[various mindless anti-liberal rhetoric deleted for the sake of good taste]


>>You are hereby certified for rank of MegaDitto..
>>
>Thank you very much. I AM a Mega DittoHead!
>                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Translate: "I am a mindless idiot who has no clue WRT how to think for one's
self, therefore, I just agree with the drivel Limbaugh puts out, because
so many other people do."

Thank the fates that when Bush falls, Rush will fall...



-- 
*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  //  Newsflash from the Vatican: *
*      the KelleyMan:Kelley L. Miller  //  "Easter has been cancelled...*    
*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  //  Someone found the body...."   *
****************Know God...No peace.  No God...Know peace.***************
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Quayle Smashes Gore...
Date: 16 Oct 92 03:41:26 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, tedr@athena.cs.uga.edu (Ted Kalivoda) writes:

> Well, like I thought would happen, Quayle demoloshid Gore in the debate.  It
> looks like Quayle could be the only thing that might possibly save Bush.  
> 
> Ted K.

What?

We are talking about DAN Quayle and AL Gore right.
Did they do a second debate that I somehow missed?

Or did the typical conservative media bias just convince you
of this after the fact?

doug
From: pvanmeur@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Pim van Meurs)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Rush and Columbus
Date: 12 Oct 92 21:32:57 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

Just heared Rush missrepresenting in his usual manner the ideas
behind multi-culturalism. He the received a phone call from Grace
who read him a passage from Columbus's diary and doubted her
sources. When she stated she had found this in 3 different
publications, Rush tried to use arguments like histroy has too often
been rewritten, I won't argue this with you. It's good to hear Rush
being humbled, nevertheless his ego makes up for his lack of brain,
he can't admit that he is wrong.
I loved it.
Pim van Meurs
-- 
Pim van Meurs  UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Mail Code A-030  	 UUCP : ...!ucsd!ssurf.ucsd.edu!VANMEURS
UCSD La Jolla  CA 92093  ARPA : VANMEURS@ssurf.ucsd.edu
(619)-458 9729 Home	 Bitnet : VANMEURS%ssurf.ucsd.edu@sdsc
From: lape@cs.utk.edu (Bryon S. Lape)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: The truth about lies
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:21:24 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - CS Department
NNTP-Posting-Host: duncan.cs.utk.edu

	Clinton's head is still full of mush.


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   The American education system only teaches you to go into debt,
		fortunately, I know how to get out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: griffin@eecae.ee.msu.edu (Danny Griffin)
Subject: Re: GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
Organization: Michigan State University
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 04:01:57 GMT

jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:

>In article <9210081734.AA21296@MIT.EDU> bowler@athena.mit.edu (Bert Smith) writes:

>> worst economic record in 50 years. 

>Yeah, right - worst economy in 50 years? How do you figure that? Inflation 
>of 3% or less, home mortgage rates of less than 8%, unemployment of 
>92.5%

That's right!  Listen, there really *is* enough legitimate ammo to hit Bush
with without lying.  How about:

	o  Tax increases
	o  Capital gains
	o  Quota bill
	o  Attended Rio environmental conference
	o  Caved in to pressure and put Magic Johnson on AIDS panel
	o  Stayed distant from Clarence Thomas when the left tried to
	   ruin him	   
	o  Publically condemned police in Rodney King case on national TV
	   without/before due process of law

Oh, is it because the left is for all of those things, too?
-- 
Dan Griffin                     Abort the whales with a nuclear handgun.
griffin@egr.msu.edu
From: dpage@ra.csc.ti.com (Doug Page)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Family leave farce (was a most pressing COncern)
Date: 15 Oct 92 17:19:55 GMT
Organization: Texas Instruments

In article <Yy7-11B@engin.umich.edu>, jwh@citi.umich.edu (Jim Howe) writes:
|> In article <books.31.0@fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu>, books@fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu (Roger Books) writes:
|> |> In article <3+7-dv_@engin.umich.edu> jwh@citi.umich.edu (Jim Howe) writes:
|> |> >
|> |> >And if your neighbor has something you want you are in a low-power
|> |> >situation for the purposes of demanding that your neighbor give
|> |> >that something to you.  As a citizen you are on a more 'equal'
|> |> >footing.  Why not try to get it legislated?  
|> |> 
|> |> It is, it's called eminant domain(sp).  It's something that's supposed
|> |> to help the majority.  The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
|> |> 
|> 
|> Ah, the tyranny of the majority.  Sorry, that's not the principle on
|> which this country was formed, nor is it a moral principle.  The
|> Constitution granted specific powers to the Federal government *because*
|> the founders wanted to avoid the tyranny of the majority.  Government
|> has no moral authority to deny the rights of individuals even if that
|> denial results in benefits for the majority.

Good point.  That's why we don't have any laws that might restrict
(or even eliminating) such individual rights as the right to prostitute
one's own body, to rob, to assalt, to murder, to use drugs, to sell spoiled
meat, poltry, or dairy products, to not pay taxes, no manufacture unsafe
products, to sell unsafe products, to extort, to embezzle, . . .

This nation was not formed on the tyranny of the minority either.  The
Constitution was written to enumerate the restrictions on the federal
government.  "The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States
respectively, or to the people." (10th Amendment)  Indeed, in Article
IV, Section 4, the Constitution requires that "The United States shall
guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of
government,...", a tempered for of majority rule yes, but hardly the blank
check you claim.

dp

***  The opinions are mine and do not necessarily represent those of my  ***
***  employer.                                                           ***
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Re: GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 20:15:17 GMT

In article <9210081734.AA21296@MIT.EDU> bowler@athena.mit.edu (Bert Smith) writes:
>
>                GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
>
> *    Bush's latest attack on Bill Clinton for a trip he took 23 years
> ago is a pathetic attempt to divert the American people from the
> worst economic record in 50 years.  It is a sign of pure
>desperation.

Yeah, right - worst economy in 50 years? How do you figure that? Inflation 
of 3% or less, home mortgage rates of less than 8%, unemployment of 
92.5% - times are a hell of a lot better than they were in 1982 when the 
unemployment rate was 10 and 11%, and a whole hell of a lot better than 
during the Jimmy Carter administration when double-digit inflation, 
interest rates and unemployment stagnated the economy for 4 years.

Geez, don't they teach history at MIT? Or are the liberal, rabid Clinton
supporters incapable of seeing anything that might prove them wrong?
In any case, although Clinton's sympathy for Communism in the 60s is
important to me, the far more important question is not what happened
30 years ago, but what is happening now - i.e. why is Clinton continually
lying about his past, or at the very least failing to admit the whole 
truth. 

When Clinton's friends (friends, mind you) are questioning him
and pointing out the contradictions in his life, and when one of them 
even states that it's not suprising that Clinton wouldn't want the truth 
to come out about his past, then intelligent thinking voters have to consider
whether this guy can be trusted.

-- 
John Switzer               | Why am I voting for Clinton? Because... 
                           | Bill Gates: 36, CEO Microsoft, $6 billion
74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | Me: 36, Tech Writer, 1978 Diesel Rabbit
jrs@netcom.com             | Screw the nerdy rich! (at least 'til I get there)
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6638 alt.sex:32590 soc.singles:27469 alt.politics.homosexuality:6411 talk.bizarre:33590
From: arsmith@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Alan Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.sex,soc.singles,alt.politics.homosexuality,talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: But who Gets to Sue for Paternity?
Date: 10 Oct 92 22:11:48 GMT
Organization: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO  80523

In article <1992Oct10.192935.5960@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
>
>] In article <Oct09.195039.99097@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> arsmith@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Alan Smith) writes:
>] >If a man gets another man pregnant, I'll be rather surprised.
>] 	I predict there'll be two guys even more surprised than you!
>the subject line sorta says it all....

<looks up> Well, the one who's pregnant, of course.

Big Al.  Let's see how far we can overplay this...
From: miles@ms.uky.edu (Stephen D. Grant)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Quayle Smashes Gore...
Date: 14 Oct 92 02:22:45 GMT
Organization: University of Kentucky, USA. -5 GMT

tedr@athena.cs.uga.edu (Ted Kalivoda) writes:

>Well, like I thought would happen, Quayle demoloshid Gore in the debate.  It
>looks like Quayle could be the only thing that might possibly save Bush.  

>Ted K.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAA

We must have watched two different debates.
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6501 alt.rush-limbaugh:6889
From: lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh on Madonna (was Re: Summary Mon 10/5/92)
Date: 8 Oct 92 21:12:36 GMT
Organization: LLNL

In article <1992Oct7.234748.21201@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>In article <BvoKoC.F44@news.cso.uiuc.edu> el27166@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (This Space for Rent) writes:
>>[Rush taking a jab at Madonna deleted]

>IMO, Madonna is one step above Sinead O'Connor as far as attitudes go.
>(And woah, but that step below is a DOOZY.) 

	How???
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.sex.bondage