From: mkagalen@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (michael kagalenko)
Subject: Re: Soviet military training
Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 02115, USA
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 02:01:35 GMT

In article <Dec.31.14.38.27.1992.15968@pilot.njin.net> hubey@pilot.njin.net (Hubey) writes:
>In article <1992Dec31.023346.13878@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu> mkagalen@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (michael kagalenko) writes:
>
>
>> 2nd : When it was the last time you've read something ? Baltic rep. are
>> independent already. Strong border is a good idea in that case too,
>> since considerable part of national product of this countries is 
>> obtained by smuggling valuble metals from Russia (tolerated by 
>> governments of those rep.) & selling to the west without paying export tariffs.
>>  
>
>Lighten up, guy. Why all the constant posts on tps on why Soviet
>troops are not leaving the Baltic Republics and why it means they
>are not reallly indpependent, etc etc etc.

Probably this newsgroup is your only source, guy - hence a questions of 
that kind. Is Cuba independent from America ? (There's an american military
base there, if you haven't read that before ;-)



>From the stories I've been hearing, it looks like most money being
>made in the CIS is now via smuggling and other illegal activities.
>
>And since, there's still no new constitution, every attempt at
>private enterprise can probably still be considered illegal.
>
>Let's leave aside the pointless rhetoric.

Yes, let's do it.  You can determine whether someone in the US is honest or not 
only after reading US constitution ? ;-> You posts definetly 
lack a clue, my dear friend .


>
>> I agree (see below) Chechnya does not have external borders & they're 
>> taking advantage of one feature of Russian character -  getting angry
>> slowly. However, this kind of stament is typical for Hitler - type
>> dictators. They're stupid & therefore dangerous. 
>
>Huhh... Now Dudayev is a new Hitler. If I remember my readings
>Dudayev's threats were in reality counter-threats--of what they
>would/could do in case of all out attack by the military on
>Chechnia. HOw does this make him a Hitler ? Did he write books
>where he advocates wiping out Jews, Gypsies, Russians, etc etc.
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is it your definition of Hitler (writing nasty books ;) ? Let me ask you
just 1 (one) lill' question : are you college student ? ;->



>Do you propose a solution to these stupid peoples problems ?
>
>So far you've proposed a 'sanitary cordon'. What exactly is your
>idea ? Maybe you want all 'dem dangerous Chechens removed from
                                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Russian cities where they can't infect the pure Russians with crime?

Note- I haven't said anything like that. Is it your style of discussion -
posting things I never said as my opinion ?


>Maybe you want to put all of them behind the 'cordon' to  
>grow vegetables for Moscow ?  What is it exactly ?

You're implying, that as soon as criminal activity prevented, growing veg. 
is the only thing they are able to do ? You don't think really good of them :-) 

>As you write below, they`re intellectually incapable thus incapable
>of being educated and reaching the dizzying intellectual heights
>that have been reached by people such as yourself, as you are
>now demonstrating on tps :-)..

Well, they still can reach intellectual heights demonstrated by you.


>> Who told you that they terrorize the whole SA ? Some divisions of it
>> were unlucky enough to get a considerable percent of those guys. Typically 
>> their intellectual level is low, much lower then their self-esteem.
>> They're dealt with succesfully, however ;->
>
>Huh.. Chechens work out to about 0.4% of the population. If some
>divisions got 1000%(10 times)  more than what chance would allow, that would
>be about 4% in the division. That means, 99 divisions would get
>zero Chechens and one would get 4 Chechens for 96 others.
>Normally there should be 4 Chechens for 996 others. How does this
>work exactly ?

Again brilliant piece of ignorance. You have no even slightest idea, 
how divisions of SA are composed - and still trying to argue.

>
>Besides all this, you seem to imply an intimate understanding of
>them. How could you know what their intellectual level is without
>either engaging in serious discussions with them or hearing other
>peoples' opinions of them (and believing everything, of course) ?

When & where I said that i implyed (...) without speaking to them
or hearing other people's opinions ? Oh , I've forgotten- you're
reading directly my thoughts. ;-)

>
>BTW, who's dealt with successfully, the Chechen mafias or the
>Chechen people ? And what methods are used to deal with them
>successfully ? 
>-- 

I'd better not to discuss that to preserve the effectiveness of those
methods   ;-)