From: abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian)
Subject: TIME HAS INERTIA - ABIAN REPEATS overwhelmingly demanded (A3)
Keywords: attn: CHINTER, SITES TAO, WATTS
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:03:06 GMT

                                            12-15-92

To the readers of TIME HAS INERTIA  

   As you can see from the postings (despite the Gestapo-KGB tactics to
silence or kill TIME HAS INERTIA) the interest in acceptance of my prin-
ciples (A1), (A2), (A3), (A4) are growing throughout the World.  
   
   Science and Physics are in a turmoil since I put my fingers on the
most evasive, elusive, most kept-in closet, most vulnerable, items in 
Science and in Physics -i.e., 
    
    THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE MOST BASIC, THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL AND THE MOST 
   PRIMAL  CAUSE BEHIND ANY ACTION OF A PARTICLE, AN AMOEBA, A VIRUS, A
   BACTERIUM, A STONE, A FLOWER, A PERSON, A PLANET, A SOLAR SYSTEM, A
   GALAXY, etc.,  AND THE ENTIRE COSMOS as my Principle (A3) 

(A3)   THE PRIMAL CAUSE OF EVERY ACTION IS
       THE GAINING OF A FEELING OF SECURITY


  I have repeated  (A3) and have given you various examples validating 
and experimentally verifying (A3). Nevertheless, people are asking me again 
and again to express and explain my (A3).  I have expressed and explained
my (A3) at least 20 times, but I still receive numerous requests to repeat 
it.  So I am repeating.  
  Please SAVE THIS and ANY OTHER POSTINGS IN TIME HAS INERTIA -it is 
difficult for me to repeat these postings endlessly.

  I repeat again I cannot give a precise definition of "SECURITY".  Because
it is the penultimate basic term.  I can describe it by saying that SECURITY
is the  process of LIFE ITSELF,  it is the DNA of existence it is the marrow
of the bone of the existence...  

 People find (A3), unacceptable, beta-sigma, without content, useless,  Mr.
Tao gives 296 lines of proving that (A3) is false.  The overwhelming major-
ity of the "Guardians of Physics and Truth" in a state of outrageous temper 
tantrum stamp their feet and yell hysterically:

    "Abian, verify your (A3), give us experimental verifications !"
 My reply is:

    " You people , you hysterically yelling rejectors of my (A3) you are
      my best experimental verification.  I am shaking the foundations
      of your precambrian notions of  GR, QM, etc, and you  react
      viciously, sarcastilcally, spitefully  TO GAIN A FEELING OF
      SECURITY.  IT MAKES YOU FEEL SECURE TO REJECT RADICALLY NEW IDEAS,
      WHICH ARE NOT COMPATIBLE WITH YOUR PRECAMBRIAN INDOCTRINATIONS.
      I CANNOT GIVE A BETTER PROOF OF EXPERIMENTAL VERIFIABILITY OF
      (A3).  YOU  and 6 billion others are the best experimental veri-
      fication of my (A3)"   You, as well as I act COMPLETELY AND
      PREDICTABLY AND EXPERIMENTALLY VERIFIABLY ACCORDING TO (A3)


Also, I explained (and I am not going to repeat again):
      Gravitational attraction, repulsion of like charges,
      the behavior of particles in test chambers, the behavior
      of sulfuric acid, the behavior of  water vs a drop of ink
      etc., etc.,  


Also, every action to oppose an intruding status-quo disturbing particle
      is caused by the " gaining a feeling of security " 

Also, acquiring and adjusting to a new status quo is based on (A3)

    I know that "Guardians of Physics and Truth"  find my  (A3) use-
    less, without content since  I consider (A3) as a basic cause of various 
    two mutually incompatible actions.  They jump  "OH, YOU are  contra-
    dicting ".  Please do not teach me Logic, I know both Aristotelian  
    and nonAristotelian  (Brouwerian ) Logic !  I don't have time to
    give another series of lectures (but I will finish THE elementary
    derivation lecture of the  Relativistic addition of velocities, 
    as I promised).

  (A3)  is not self-contradictory:
   

   " General Petain  said to the people of France 
     FOR THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION,  COEXIST WITH THE ENEMY DILUTE 
     HIM "
      (just like water dilutes the drop of the invading ink)

    " General De Gaulle  (from England)  said to the people of France
      FOR THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION, FIGHT AND DESTROY THE ENEMY,
      DO NOT COEXIST"
      (just like sulfuric acid evaporates the intruding drop of water)

     Both Petain and De Gaulle  INVOKED   THE GENIUS of my (A3) one
     in prescribing "Coexistence" the other in  prescribing"Noncoexistence"

      Do Petain and De Gaulle make  (A3) self-contradictory, meaningless,
without content?  THEY INVOKED MY (A3) IN THE MOST DRAMATIC THE LIFE
OF A NATION THREATENING SITUATION.   IS THIS PROOF ENOUGH FOR YOU
"GUARDIANS OF PHYSICS AND TRUTH" OF THE EXPERIMENTAL VERIFIABILITY OF
(A3)!? and that  (A3) has the most profound life-saving content ! ?

     As I have remarked previously - at a more REALISTIC level, of 
course Again based (A3), I would say that the most truthful cause
of Petain's and De Gaulle's call were  the overwhelming power of
(A3) at the personal level.  
    
  What Petain was saying is:
    
     " French people it makes  ME feel secure if you coexist with
       the enemy and dilute him"

and what De Gaulle was saying is;

     " French people, it make ME feel secure if you fight the enemy
       to death"   
    
 You "guardians of Physics and Truth" do you need more experimental 
verifiability of (A3) ?

     I have given you much more instances of the experimental
verifiability of (A3)  that you will ever get from Newton's or
Einstein's   Laws.

    The sacro-sanct Law that        
     
        "a unit mass at distance  r  units exerts on a unit of mass  
         k/r^2  units of force"     ( k is a constant )

   Which is accepted as a sacro-sanct Law and which supposedly  has been  
billion times verified.  Is not too convincing to me.  
   
   I will explain why.  In fact I will even do better than Newton, I
will even  DERIVE  k/r^2  without forcing you to accept it as a sacro-
sanct Law.
   For this all you have to know that the  area of a sphere of
radius  r  is equal to  4pi r^2.

   Imagine a  lit candle ( of unit luminosity 1)  at the center of a 
sphere of radius  r.   Of  course it is not too unintelligent to think
that  1/ 4pi r^2   unit of light is received by the unit area on the
surface of the shere.  Hence, the intensity of light (i.e., the force 
of light) at  distance  r  is given by

                   1/ 4pi r^2  =  k/r^2


     Why I am not too convince that  k/r^2 must be considered as 
sacro-sanct, because  I think it is more rational to accept that
the volume of the sphere is more basic than the  area
of the sphere in matters of  THE EXTENT OF INFLUENCE  and  a more
basic law should have involved  r^3  and not  r^2.  
  I know, I know that the "Guardians of Physics and Truth" will immediately 
with foam in their mouths jump on me and  will say that what I am
saying has been known for 400 years (open any kindergarten text-book)
it is there.  Besides,   All you have to do is to take 
the integral of  4pi r^2  w.r.t  r  and get  yourself involved
with   r^3 and interpret it in an appropriate way.

     But I am not even satisfied with  Classical or  SR or GR or QM.
 You "Guardians of Physics and Truth"  must accept in your theories the  
 (A3).  There is the elemental craving of gaining a feeling of security 
among particles among electrons, protons, etc.etc.  THERE IS NO OTHER
WAY BUT TO UNCONDITIONNALY SURRENDER TO (A3) - UNCONDITIONALLY
ACCEPT THAT ANY OBJECT ANIMATE OR INANIMATE IS GOVERNED BY (A3).

     Do not jump to Neanderthalish-precambrian conclusions that (A3)
is self contradictory because I say that it could  the cause of "P"  and 
the cause of "not P" for any phenomenon  "P".  
    Do not think that there is only one path to gain a feeling of security.
    Petain and De Gaulle  are examples of two opposing paths motivated by
the genius of (A3).  Faynman integral paths are another example of 
 different paths  BOTH CAUSED AND MOTIVATED by the same  

 
(A3)   GAINING A FEELING OF SECURITY

   I HAVE NO TIME TODAY TO REPEATING  HOW  (A3)  ALSO IMPLIES
(A1), (A2) and (A4).  Please consult my previous postings. 
Unfortunately (and really I regret that) I do not have TIME  for endless
repetitions.  
   I COUNT ON BRILLIANT  READERS OF  TIME HAS INERTIA AND THE YOUNG
IMAGINATIVE AND AGGRESSIVE MINDS FOR DEVELOPING AND INTRODUCING
(A1), (A2), (A4)  based on the CORNERSTONE OF THE NEW REVOLUTION IN THE 
PHYSICS  -  (A3)
   I was told that in Russia they are very seriously considering the
ramifications and implication of  TIME HAS INERTIA - very seriously,
without sarcasm, without childish kiddings, without putting me down
without sardonic remarks, without mockery, without vilification,
without slander and wretched brutish and beastly envy and hostility.

   I love all of you verfy much  (it makes me feel secure),

                                            Alexander Abian