HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pharvey@quack.sac.ca.us (Paul Harvey)
Subject: Cuneus was (Pagan Rock Artists...)
Organization: The Duck Pond public unix: +1 408 249 9630, log in as 'guest'.
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 01:52:42 GMT

In article <Bvt2rM.KIJ@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk> 
jack@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Jack Campin) writes:
>According to a friend of mine who's doing a Ph. D. studying the origins of
>placenames in Fife, "pit" meant "cunt" in old Gaelic, so it didn't usually
>survive in placenames in the Gaelic area - it's commonest in areas where
>Pictish was replaced pretty quickly by Scots.  (Another friend of mine
>looked at what coalminers in Fife used to call their pits last century: the
>unofficial names for two of them were "Hell's Arse" and "The Cunt"... one
>of the odder linguistic coincidences on the Scottish map).  I'd guess that
>Derick Thomson's "Companion to Gaelic Scotland" has the details.  "Bal-" in
>various forms occurs in all the Celtic languages: "Baile" in modern Irish,
>and (I think) "Pwl-" in Welsh and "Pol-" in Cornish.  If Pictish was Celtic
>(which some people think) it was very different from any existing Celtic
>language.

Some interesting words you're beating around there. Though "cunt" is one
of the big "BAD" words in US English, I've always thought it
interesting. Cuneus is Latin for wedge, as in Cuneiform, meaning wedge
form, the written language of Mesopotamia. Symbolic of the triangle, female
genitalia and the triple Goddess.
From: law10@po.CWRU.Edu (Lorrie A. Wood)
Newsgroups: alt.pagan
Subject: Re: bad woad puns.
Date: 16 Oct 1992 00:45:54 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc12.ins.cwru.edu


Not exactly a pun, but what the hey:

Blues Brothers II:

A Suitcase Full of Woad
(or Woaden with Woad, if you really MUST have a pun!)

Featuring the '106 MIles to Chicago Mantra (revised)'

It's 106 MIles to Chicago.  We have fresh horses, a full rack of stone-tipped
spears, it's dark, and we're wearing nothing at all.

Hit it.

AND:

Illinois Fundies. I -hate- Illinois Fundies (storms through crowd, spear 
	extended. Much carnage)

ALSO:

	This is a cop horse.  It's got a cop bridle, a cop saddle, cop stirrups,
and cop horseshoes.  Also a belly ful of cop oats.
	(to be said directly after Jake and Elwood jump over an open drawbridge)
 (For the Pun Aware: was that cop oats -- or compost?)

BB, and Read You Later . . .
-- 
"All statements are true in some sense, false in some sense, meaningless in
some sense, true and false in some sense, true and meaningless in some sense,
false and meaningless in some sense, and true and false and meaningless in
some sense." -- _Principia_Discordia_ -- the Book of the Church of Eris (Chaos)
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu (Cosma R. Shalizi)
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: The End
Date: 7 Oct 1992 21:25:50 GMT
Organization: Vampire Research Group at Berkeley :)
NNTP-Posting-Host: planecrash.berkeley.edu

In article <0eoXWHq00VpKM0ylJG@andrew.cmu.edu> re0t+@andrew.cmu.edu (Ronald William Ely) writes:
>
>>2. The easiest way must be to create some sort of biological weaponthat 
>> could wipe out all life on earth. This virus (or something like that) 
>> must be able to multiply in an enormous rate, and it must whitstand any 
>> temperature. (My suggestion is that its allready invented ?)
>	If you want to destroy ALL life, not bloody likely... there are just too
>many kinds of organisms in the world so some of them would be immune.
>But if you were lucky you could destroy all humans.... maybe with an
>airborn version of the AIDS virus.
    Even if you had an airborn version of AIDS, it's too slow as it stands.
You'd really want something with an incubation of a couple of weeks that then
kills in a few days. The pneumonic (note, not bubonic) plague fits the bill,
but it succumbs to antibiotics. We could certainly develop an antibiotic
resistant strain, though, and distribute it simultaneously throughout the
globe. (One coughing person hanging around Heathrow would be a good start.)
    I outlined this idea at dinner to some friends of mine once. It wasn't
until I'd finished that I realized what I'd been saying. Hellacious
experience. Now I know how Oppie felt...
	Cosma Rohilla Shalizi
	In Real Life: lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu
	larval physicist
THE STARS ARE RIGHT: CTHULHU IN '92! WHY SETTLE FOR THE LESSER EVIL?
-- 
"Apart from hydrogen, the most common thing in the universe is stupidity."
-Harlan Ellison, _An Edge in My Voice_
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: knb@postman.hsn.no (KNUT ERIK BORGEN)
Subject: Problem with viruses etc.
Organization: Nordland College
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 08:49:12 GMT

I read about your plan of creating a virus that would make people sterile. 
It could be effective (I would'nt like getting sterile...), but there are 
some problems:

1. If it's discovered that people get sterile (Men or females?) there will 
   most surtan be put a lolt of effort to make a vaccine. Therefor must a 
   such virus be extremly effective so that there will be no time to create 
   one.
 
2. Even if you make all the men in the world sterile there will always be a 
   lot of sperm banks around.... (If only the men got sterilized)

3. If there is a biological effect that makes people sterile (Not physical) 
   there will always exist some sort of vaccine.


At the end I would say that I don't think it would work to make people 
sterile cause to a virus. It's too likely that the effect could be 
reversed. I suggested that we make people sterile with the use of Radar 
Beams. A small dose of these beems makes one sterile for life (I'm sure 
about men, but not women). It could be done by creating transmitters at 
ground and using planes with radars. It could also be possible to place a 
very powerful radar in orbit on a satelite. This satelite could send rays 
down on the people of the Earth. The only problem with this is the 
Atmosphere. It would probably stop most of the rays.
If it is succeded to sterilize most of the people on earth there will most 
likely be a gigantic war for the rest. (Man will never agree on who should 
get the chance to multiply...) If it goes this far, the rest will probably 
wipe itself out.

KEB
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: cs911461@ariel.yorku.ca (CHRISTIAN D. ARMOUR)
Subject: Re: WHY?
Originator: cs911461@a01.ariel.yorku.ca
Organization: York University, Toronto, Canada
Distribution: york
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 21:36:23 GMT



In article <WMPERRY.92Oct8103133@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> wmperry@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (William Michael Perry) writes:
>> LET ME GUESS.  YOU ALL LISTEN TO HEAVY METAL FOR BREAKFAST.  NO OFFENSE...  


I like "The Thieving Magpie" because it's the score to that really
cool fight scene in Stanley Kubrick's "A Clockwork Orange".

Wagner's "Ride of the Valkyries" is as good as a second cup of
coffee, largely due to "Apocalypse Now".  I also like the smell of
napalm, first thing in the morning.


C. Armour-Kidson
cs911461@ariel.yorku.ca
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: locklin@titan.ucc.umass.edu ()
Subject: Re: No looking at your neighbors' papers
Organization: Campus Crusade for Cthulhu
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 00:57:04 GMT
X-Posted-From: titan.ucc.umass.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <1992Oct12.232602.1@opie.bgsu.edu> bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:
>Q: What's wrong when an eco-fuck says:
>>I'm an environmentalist...
>and the person he is arguing with says:
>>[paraphrased] I'm an environmentalist too...
>and they are posting to alt.destroy.the.earth?
>
>A:  They are in the wrong newsgroup! Yeah! Wrong fucking newsgroup! Spouting
>eco-fucking-shit on the _wrong_ newsgroup.  Send them away, make them go home,
>leave us alone, eco-fucks!  Go home and plant a tree!  Fuck a baby seal!  Post
>to alt.save.the.earth!  Hahahahahah, yayayayayayayay! Leave us alone!
>
>--Joshua
>BC "fucking" 205CS@opie.bgsu.edu    jallen@andy.bgsu.edu

right fucking on man!


Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: locklin@titan.ucc.umass.edu ()
Subject: Re: WHY?
Organization: Campus Crusade for Cthulhu
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 00:24:30 GMT
X-Posted-From: titan.ucc.umass.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <WMPERRY.92Oct8103133@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> wmperry@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (William Michael Perry) writes:

>
>BTW: How about just nuking the ozone layer completely?  That'd
>sterilize a people pretty quick wouldn't it?  Lets just all buy
>plastic dixie cups and have a big bonfire at the South Pole.  (But
>seriously:  is there something we could do to quickly and seriously
>damage the atmosphere so it would not screen out as much radiation?)
>

I've got an idea. What destroys ozone? Chlorine. WHere is there lots of 
chlorine?
Salt deposits. Would a nuke dissociate the chlorine fron the sodium?
I think so, if we could get lots of salt near the nuke.
Comments?

servant of Cthulhu...
-Scott
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: MANDTBACKA@finabo.abo.fi (Mats Andtbacka Ktf92)
Subject: Re: Atmospheric Destruction (was: Re: WHY?)
Organization: Abo Akademi University, Finland
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 13:40:41 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.23

In <1b5bciINN89v@agate.berkeley.edu> lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu writes:

>     But why? Think about this. Why do we - well, They, anyhow - want ozone?
>  To keep out ultraviolet and the like. Destroying ozone is all well and good,
>  but we could simply try overwhelming the ozone layer. Heat up the sun. Not
>  only do we start getting skin cancer, but we actually do get global warming,
>  and there'd be nothing the eco-hobbits could do about it.
>     There are <modest cough> technical difficulties, but I'm sure something
>  could be arranged (drop Neptune or Uranus into the sun? Maybe Jupiter? Seed

      Heat up the *sun* ?!? You don't go for second best, do you...
Dropping planets into the darng thing: Sorry, unless I misremember
Jupiter's only about a one-thousandth the size (and mass) of the sun -
or was that a ten-thousandth? Enough zeroes to make the scheme
pointless, though.

      Global warming: I don't *think* the ozone layer contributes very
much to that, but I'll go along with it being a good idea. The best
greenhouse gas by orders of magnitude is water (well, steam then) - how
about nuking the Pacific Ocean? Details, anyone?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 The above opinions are *NOT*, except if and when otherwise explicitly stated,
        those of anybody and / or anything with any brains whatsoever.
  Mats Andtbacka is really: MANDTBACKA@finabo.abo.fi (or ABOVAX::MANDTBACKA).
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: TARZAN
Subject: WHY?
Organization: Bell-Northern Research
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 13:38:43 GMT

LET ME GUESS.  YOU ALL LISTEN TO HEAVY METAL FOR BREAKFAST.  NO OFFENSE...  
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: MANDTBACKA@finabo.abo.fi (Mats Andtbacka Ktf92)
Subject: Atmospheric Destruction (was: Re: WHY?)
Organization: Abo Akademi University, Finland
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 09:35:42 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.23


     The way I understand it, CFCs - and perhaps chlorine gas in
particular - destroy ozone (oxygen-3) by means of a cathalytic
reaction - i.e., the CFCs themselves are *not* destroyed in the
process (chlorine gas, at least, is not). Now, if you wanted to do
some serious damage to the ozone layer, you would go for a better
catalyst - something light, efficient, catalyzing a fast reaction, and
with a long lifespan in the upper atmosphere.

     CFCs are abt. 100 times heavier than air, so they've trouble
getting up there; also, excessive gamma rays and cosmic radiation
*may* (I'm not sure on this) decompose them. Other ozone-destroying
agents may work a bit too slowly, or you'd need too much of them;
maybe you'd have to go for destroying something else than ozone (it
can't be the *only* critically important thing up there, can it?). But
as for actually thinking up such a catalyst... I'm only a freshman
chemistry student! Ask a professor!

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The opinions above are most definitely not, except if and when
otherwise is explicitly stated, those of anybody / anything with any
brains whatsoever.       Mats Andtbacka is really MANDTBACKA@finabo.abo.fi
From: jkiley@andy.bgsu.edu (James H. Kiley)
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: Atmospheric Destruction (was: Re: WHY?)RE:Atmospheric Dest.3
Date: 16 Oct 92 17:22:48 GMT
 <1992Oct14.134041.19380@abo.fi> <1bkti7INNj19@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Oct16.053432.1@acad.drake.edu>
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.

In article <1992Oct16.053432.1@acad.drake.edu>, jsq002@acad.drake.edu writes:
|> In article <1bkti7INNj19@agate.berkeley.edu>, lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu (Cosma R. Shalizi) writes:
|> > In article <1992Oct14.134041.19380@abo.fi> MANDTBACKA@finabo.abo.fi (Mats Andtbacka Ktf92) writes:
|> >>In <1b5bciINN89v@agate.berkeley.edu> lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu writes:
|> >     I wasn't thinking so much of giving it more fuel, as of putting a 
|> > fairly large mass at the center of the thing to increase the gravitational
|> > pressure and drive up the fusion reaction rate. I haven't gone through the
|> > math, and stopping the thing in the center would be tough. Perhaps we should
|> > compress the target mass to neutronium first? You're probably right about
|> > the mass though. Anyone have an idea of how much the Oort Cloud ways in
|> > toto, and what percentage of it is hydrogen?
|> >
|>  Ok, more stuff here...i THINK that the total mass of the Oort Cloud isn't much
|>  more than that of the asteroid belt - i.e. just about enough to make up an 
|>  Earth-sized planet.  In the area of composition, think about what most comets
|>  are composed of - water ice, miscellaneous rocks, and a carbonaceous sludge
|>  similar in consistency and composition to crude oil...to sum up there isn't
|>  too much mass there and it is composed somewhat of hydrogen, but not enough to
|>  make any sort of difference in what the Sun's energy output is...also, getting
|>  ANYTHING to the center of the Sun would be extraordinarily
|> difficult - nearly anything that you get near the Sun would be vapourised in an
|>  instant and expelled back out into space by the solar wind...to increase the
|>  gravitational pressure of the Sun and thus its rate of fusion would require
|>  more mass than is contained in the solar system outside of the Sun...

	Okay, deal is this:
	Even if it's not hydrogen, that's okay.  A lot of the sun isn't hydrogen
nowadays either.  (Well, okay, it's *mostly* hydrogen, but there's a lot of it
that ain't.	
	But that's not my point.
	For an emitted photon (the fastest, smallest thing In The Universe) to 
escape from the center of the sun to the surface thereof takes on the order of 
thousands of years.  I don't know it precisely, but can find the number if you 
want.   Therefore the idea of dropping something into the 'heart' of the sun 
isn't feasible at all, as it'd take still longer, and any object you care to toss
in there'd be destroyed by photodisintegration as well, long before you got past
the outermost shell.

	Jim Kiley, Astronomer Wannabe
	jkiley@andy.bgsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: wmperry@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (William Michael Perry)
Subject: Re: Save the planet or mankind? (was Re: No looking at your neighbors' papers....)
Followup-To: alt.destroy.the.earth
Organization: Computer Science Student, Indiana University
	<1992Oct12.164945.24090@ornl.gov> <Bw1C7z.Bo6@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
	<1992Oct13.141717.7912@ornl.gov>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 01:40:46 GMT


>>>Given the choice, I'd prefer to save our species--not a lifeless chunk of 
>>>minerals.
>> If Allah is merciful, you won't be given the choice.

>Oh, would you choose the lifeless chunk?

I think the point this guy is missing is that nobody here would choose
to save either one, right?  Some people just miss the point entirely.

-Bill Perry
From: lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu (Cosma R. Shalizi)
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: Forging a World Dictatorship
Date: 11 Oct 1992 20:22:44 GMT
Organization: Vampire Research Group at Berkeley :)
NNTP-Posting-Host: whirlwind.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Oct11.193005.2922@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> corleyj@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley ) writes:
>On the other hand, world domination _would_ help blow the planet
>to smithereens.  Though I don't think Siberia is the right place
>to start.  What about all the downtime when we aren't propogating
>our sinister, malevolent rule?  What will we do for fun?  No,
>we've got to start in Southern Florida, or out on one of the
>more polluted beaches in California.  THEN we go to Siberia and
>get all the scientists and resources and stuff.
>Yeah.  That's the ticket.
>	Jason
>	Ono-Sendai R&D
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I BEG you pardon?
    But, on the more serious topic of downtime - don't you _like_ building
snowmen, felling timber and shooting large wild animals? The siberian tiger,
for instance, is nearly extinct! What, I ask you, does Florida have that can
compete with that? (Actually, I sorta feel we should keep the tigers and
domesticate them for, ah, _later use_, but such fine points of policy can be
decided later.) Besides, taking over South Florida or California would
require oodles of money and patience, which, evidently, we haven't got. It
would probably be much more economical, if we _must_ have a vacation spot, to
pick someplace pretty and dirt poor - some section of Appalachia, say (the
National Radio Astronomy Observatory out in West Virginia - no, that was not
miswritten - might come in handy), or a small bit of Polynesia. Or both.
    I still think Siberia is the way to go, though. Afghanistan might be even
better, were it not that it lacks nukes - though not uranium, appearantly.
Until someone comes up with a better alternative, I'll be hunting for a
Russian textbook on my desk...
	Cosma Rohilla Shalizi
	In Real Life: lizi@ocf.berkeley.edu
	larval physicist
	VP, Campus Crusade for Cthulhu (Berkeley)
THE STARS ARE RIGHT: CTHULHU IN '92! WHY SETTLE FOR A LESSER EVIL?
-- 
"Apart from hydrogen, the most common thing in the universe is stupidity."
-Harlan Ellison, _An Edge in My Voice_
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: dsg@impmh.uucp (Dave Gordon)
Subject: Re: Sterilization of Planet
Organization: Integrated Micro Products Ltd
Distribution: alt.destroy.the.earth
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 17:45:26 GMT

In <1992Oct7.060418.2870@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> corleyj@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley ) writes:
>
>A question though, for any biologists out there:
>Assume you want to upset the ecological cycle of predator
>and prey THE MOST.  You have the power to make _one_ species
>extinct.  Who is it?\
>
>	Jason
>	Our Reporter on the Hideous Plane of Leng

Grass?  Krill?  Plankton?  Something along these lines, I'm sure.
-- 

===============================================================================
Dave | dsg@imp.co.uk | +44 753 516599 | <this space is deliberately left blank>
===============================================================================
        You are in a little maze of twisty standards, all different
===============================================================================
From: natek@wpi.WPI.EDU (D Nathan King)
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: forging world dictatorship
Date: 12 Oct 92 00:33:57 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu

This article is about destroying the world, NOT forming a way to rule the
fuckin' thing!!!!!!!
You ought to think more destuctively, rather than in your pathetic greedy 
sense of selfishness.
Be more humane than torture (I mean torture by, One stupid person ruling the world and making things misereable). Just blow the whole fuckin' thing off the galactic map.
DEATH, DESTRUCTION, CARNAGE, and PEACE of MIND!!!!!



---THE MIGHTY KILTEER
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: locklin@titan.ucc.umass.edu ()
Subject: Re: Doing nothing at all
Organization: Campus Crusade for Cthulhu
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 01:06:27 GMT
X-Posted-From: titan.ucc.umass.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <knb.3@postman.hsn.no> knb@postman.hsn.no (KNUT ERIK BORGEN) writes:
>I told a friend of mine about the idea of destroying the earth. He then 
>imidiatly replied that we should do nothing. If we keep running it like now 
>we are sure to be doomed anyway....
>
>I myself have got a new idea...
>
>We could start a new type of religion that would demand castration. (If it 
>could appeal to youth it could be devestating.) Another way could be to make 

There was such a religion in 19th century russia. It spread like wildfire (for
whatever reasons) and was only subdued when the russian tsars outlawed it for
fear of not having any more serfs to rule over.
Point of this is that the idea may have more appeal that you think...
>
>If everybody got gay, humanity would die !

Kool, I'll have to buy myself one of those pink triangles...
-Scott



Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
From: locklin@titan.ucc.umass.edu ()
Subject: Re: WHY?
Organization: Campus Crusade for Cthulhu
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 01:01:36 GMT
X-Posted-From: titan.ucc.umass.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <1992Oct9.022019.2710@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> sjan1@cs.aukuni.ac.nz (Simon Lee           Jansen         ) writes:
>In <1992Oct9.002430.3915@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> locklin@titan.ucc.umass.edu () writes:
>
>>I've got an idea. What destroys ozone? Chlorine. WHere is there lots of 
>>chlorine?
>>Salt deposits. Would a nuke dissociate the chlorine fron the sodium?
>>I think so, if we could get lots of salt near the nuke.
>>Comments?
>
>Ummm... it wouldn't work.  You don't need to *heat* the salt, you need to
>electrolyse it  - the chloride needs to be oxidised to chlorine.  This is
>normally done by passing a massive electric current through a brine solution,
>although I guess molten sodium chloride would work too...

Er I don't think you quite realize the temperatures in a nuke explosion.
-Scott
From: eperkio@cc.helsinki.fi
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Subject: Re: list
Date: 11 Oct 92 14:05:46 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki

In article <1992Oct8.175914.1@opie.bgsu.edu>, bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:
> All of the sudden, everybody is having all kinds of great ideas.  Some of 
> these ideas are _really_ interesting, and I was wondering:  Has anybody 
> been keeping track of them, compiling them, etc?  It would be a shame for 
> all of these ideas to slowly go scrolling off of the top of my News Utility,
> to be forgotten forever.  Besides, it would be nice to have them all 
> gathered together for analysis/review.  Has anybody out there been doing 
> this, or should I start? (Or is it a dumb idea?)

Once upon a time there was an effort in this direction.  It was a file
on proposed means of destruction, the reasons why many of them couldn't
possibly work and the pros and cons of the rest.  As I recall, it was meant
to be a periodic publication, but it has been unheard of since its first
appearance.  I think the writer was Francis A. Uy, who fell silent soon
afterwards for reasons unknown, and hasn't been heard of since to the best
of my knowledge.

The idea is definitely not dumb, and if you, or someone else, is willing to 
maintain the file, it will be much appreciated.


--
Esa Perki|               "I should honor you?  Why?"
eperkio@cc.helsinki.fi      - Prometheus to Zeus according to Goethe
IRCer Shade
Organization: Freshman, MCS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.destroy.the.earth
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 14:53:07 -0400 
From: Patrick Pearse Gallagher <pg23+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: I'm your man

	I've had plans in the works to form a world dictatorship for quite some
time now.  I have a few henchmen, and this looks like a good place to
get some more.  Is anyone with me?  I promise once I take over, I will
destroy the earth.

----Patrick