HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Terri Buchman <buchman@osf.org>
Subject: Re: After 4 years, a good nights sleep...
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A724018556010832@alimac40.osf.org>
X-Xxdate: Mon, 9 Nov 92 11:52:37 GMT
Organization: Open Software Foundation
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 16:52:26 GMT

In article <892XTB2w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> Edward J.
Branley, elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us writes:
>peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:

>>
>> I am much more worried about Rehnquist than Thomas.  Any reports
>> on Renhquist's health.  How old is he, anyway?
>>
>>                                               --  Michal
>>
>
>Actually, I read somewhere that Justice O'Connor might consider
retirement
>soon, because of her breast cancer.  Not an ideal situation, since
she's in the
>middle of this court, but it still would give Clinton another
appointment.
>
There could be as many as five Supreme Court appointments coming up:
Chief Justice Rehnquist  (bad back and other health probs.)
Justice White  (75 yrs old, appointed by Kennedy in 62)
Justice  O'Connor  (Poor health)
Justice Blackmun  (81 years old)
Justice Stevens  (health problems)

Could be really interesting.

TerriB
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Subject: Re: V.P. Marilyn Quayle 1996
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:06:33 GMT

In article <PJ4yTB8w165w@Blue.Kludge.COM> alizard@Blue.Kludge.COM (A.Lizard) writes:
>enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
>
>> You heard it here first on January 20 1997 Quayle will again be Vice Presiden
>> Marylin that is.  Because Kemp Quayle is going to win by a huge LANDSLIDE a
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

oh yes, you are correct sir!  Jack Kemp is going to trouse Danny boy
by a huge LANDSLIDE in the Primaries, say about 99.5% to 0.   

>> real one not ths paltry 42% victory that Comrade Clinton received.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kemp -Quayle '96.

   Jack Kemp is not going to pick Quayle, he need a running mate
at least half as intelligent as he is.  

>> 
>> Robert R. Eno a conservative voice i Liberal Massachusetts
>
>I think you should stop inhaling. Anything.
>
>In any case, Quayle is planning to run in 1994, not 1996 (He said so
>on national TV. You calling your hero a liar?
>
>A.Lizard
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>A.Lizard Internet Addresses:
>alizard%tweekco%boo@PacBell.COM        (preferred)
>[path]!pacbell.COM!boo!tweekco!alizard (bang path for above)
>alizard@seer.mystic.com (backup)   alizard@Blue.Kludge.com (backup)
From: miwalker@mizar.usc.edu (Michael Walker)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Letterman Top 10 reasons Bush lost
Date: 13 Nov 1992 13:42:30 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: mizar.usc.edu

In article <1992Nov9.192921.60582@cc.usu.edu> slgsn@cc.usu.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov6.220537.7774@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, myrab@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (myra.bronstein) writes:
>> Thought *fer sure* that someone would have posted this,
>> but since no one has...
>> 
>> Letterman--Top 10 Reasons Bush Lost the Election--
>>>>#1 reason<<:
>> 
>> 1) Quayle is no Stockdale
>> 
>> Myra
>#2-Too many fucking liberals wanting a shit-load of hand-outs from Slick-Willy.
>   Dave-Utah State

  Yeah!  Don't let those f*&%$ liberals get those handouts, especially
when sleazy, hypocritical, republican political donors have paid big
money to get those handouts already, there's not enough HUD money to
go around!!!  And don't forget about all of those "patriotic american
conservatives" who are getting filthy stinking rich selling us out to
the foreign countries.  If they aren't able to make 6-digit figures 
selling influence to Japan, what do you expect them to do???  Settle
for the measly bucks offered by struggling American companies???  
You're right Dave!  Our future depends on good-ole, family valued, 
conservative handouts, to folks who really need it, not those evil
satanic, pinko democrats!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Subject: Re: Maybe we won't miss Dan so much...
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Date: 10 Nov 92 17:24:43 GMT

In article <egZ1TB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>asurpren@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (aimee surprenant) writes:
>
>> Hey, did you hear that Al and Tipper got lost in the woods
>> in Virginia yesterday?
>>
>> Maybe we won't miss Dan so much!
>>
>> -Aimee
>
>Yeah, Al, Tipper, and 30-40 SS agents lost in the woods.  How romantic!  It's
>the kind of thing that makes even a liberal like me kinda want to start
>a.f.a-g!
>
>
are they going to grandma's house or something?
I hope 30-40 SS agents are enough to take care of the big bad wolf.  
>
>
>|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
>|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: matta@lclark.edu (Matt Alexander)
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Keywords: Flame, attraction of moths to
Organization: Sacajawea's Voice, Portland OR
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 18:13:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov8.081043.12681@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>In article <1992Nov6.151927.28145@athena.cs.uga.edu> stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton) writes:
>
>>Is it something up there in the drinking water in and around Washington?
>
>I don't know... I avoid drinking it unless it has been boiled for tea to
>remove harmful impurities.  Come to think if it, perhaps there is something
>in this water that has been harming the minds of the local Democrats :-)

Yeah, that's it Rob-baby! Defend the Purity of your Bodily Fluids!!

"Ever heard of water floridation, Mandrake?" - Gen. Jack Ripper

--- Matt Alexander

    "Boy, they were big on crematoriums, weren't they?"
        -- George Herbert Walker Bush, during a tour of Auschwitz, 28-SEP-87
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge)
Subject: ...let her live it as a blonde joke.
Organization: Paramax Systems Corporation, Paoli PA
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 14:12:42 GMT

In article <92317.212906KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>, 
Kurt Ludwick, without any smiling face symbols, writes:

|> I'm sorry, you're right.  I'm a fool.  How HATEFUL she is!  She's a FASCIST!

  Now Kurt, I wouldn't go *that* far.  You might find it instructive to
  read Norman Mailer's impressions of the Republican convention, which ran
  in "The New Republic" a few months ago.  You'll see that, compared to his
  remarks about Marilyn's performance, I'm being kind.



-- 
 _________________________________________________________________________
|                                 |                                       |
| Herbert Rutledge, aka Train     |                                       |
| Paramax Systems Corporation     | "To post is human; to flame, divine." |
| Valley Forge Labs, M/S GVL-3    |                                       |
| P.O. Box 517, Paoli, PA  19301  |                     ---Alexander Pope |
| Internet: train@gvl.unisys.com  |                                       |
|_________________________________|_______________________________________|
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Aren't we forgetting something?
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 92 20:56:53 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu) writes:

> It won't be long now until Pete Wilson, Bob Dole, Jack Kemp, Tom Kean,
> William Welds start to clean house remove the God-Fearing people
> from the leadership and revitalize the party to be what it should be -- 
> fiscally conservative, helping big businesses(which have its pros and cons)
> but moderate-liberal on social issues, and cut the mud slinging and
> do some real work!  

What you fail to realize is that people like these (who we'll pretend
for the moment are "moderate-liberal" on social issues; the truth is
somewhat different), cannot rise to positions of power in the Republican
party without the support of the party's right wing. That's one of the
things that happened to Bush; he had to kowtow to the right so much
in order to secure his base that he lost most of the support of moderate
Democrats who had voted Republican since 1980. Those people now see
the Democrats as the best party to look out for their interests.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: USA President's power to pardon
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 17:20:59 GMT

In article <92315.083523MBADBH@rohvm1.rohmhaas.com> David B. Horvath, CDP <MBADBH@rohvm1.rohmhaas.com> writes:
>Bush could avoid all chances of prosecution by pardoning all of his {alleged}
>co-conspiritors in the IRAN-CONTRA-GATE.
>
>The pardon in itself would not stop the special prosecutor; but how's this
>deal sound: in return for a full pardon, Bush would resign shortly before
>the end of his term (mid-Novermber to mid-December) allowing J. Dan Quayle
>to become president for a short time.  JDQ could then pardon Bush and end
>the entire sorrid affair.
>
>What would Dan get out of this?  The only chance to become president, even
>if just for a short time.
>
>Is this legal?  Could it be a conspiracy??
>
>   - David

I think this is a plan all a.f.d-q ers would support....

r


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge)
Subject: Re: Integrity
Organization: Paramax Systems Corporation, Paoli PA
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 18:47:27 GMT

In article <carlson.721539119@cwis>, carlson@cwis.unomaha.edu
(Brian D. Carlson) writes:

|> 	I guess I just wonder when the biased press is going to hold the
|> same standards up against the people they set up in office.

  Well, once they've succeeded in manipulatiing the public into voting for
  their candidates and causes, they turn against their creations.  Just look 
  at the biased liberal media's record in this matter over the course of the 
  last 25 years:

     1.  They never gave President Humphrey a moment's peace,

     2.  President McGovern was the butt of countless political
         cartoons,

     3.  President Carter, in his second term, was torn to shreds in the
         political columns and endlessly mocked by Johnny Carson,

     4.  President Mondale suffered some of the most scurrilous attacks
         seen in the press since the days of James Buchanan,

     5.  And poor President Dukakis.  The press made his wife Kitty suffer
         under such a wave of dispicable attacks that the public, filled
         with revulsion, finally rebelled and voted George Bush into the
         presidency in 1992.



   
-- 
 _________________________________________________________________________
|                                 |                                       |
| Herbert Rutledge, aka Train     |                                       |
| Paramax Systems Corporation     | "To post is human; to flame, divine." |
| Valley Forge Labs, M/S GVL-3    |                                       |
| P.O. Box 517, Paoli, PA  19301  |                     ---Alexander Pope |
| Internet: train@gvl.unisys.com  |                                       |
|_________________________________|_______________________________________|
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Date: 13 Nov 92 17:32:02 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1382@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
>: rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>:  
>: : Unfortunately, Billy Boy & Gorey Al  won the election even though the peo
>: : did select President Bush and VP Quayle via the popular vote.  What a sa
>I seem to have missed the original post on this so perhaps I missed
>the point, but could somebody clue me in?  Last time I looked,
>Clinton won the popular vote.  Has there been a secret recount?
>Bill

no, this 'clinton lost the popular vote' lie has been heard from various
right-wingers on the .net. I guess out-polling your closest opponent by
5 million votes is considered a 'loss' to the republican dirty tricks
machine.

or alternately, they're all just dumb as posts and think that you cant
'win' an election w/out getting 50% of the popular vote. this is, of
course, quite incorrect.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: matta@lclark.edu (Matt Alexander)
Subject: Re: Complete this sentence
Organization: Lewis & Clark College, Portland OR
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 21:27:17 GMT

In article <mjenkins.720894739@cunews> mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson) writes:
>In <iHZPTB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>
>>mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson) writes:
>
>
>>> How do I go about starting alt.fan.robo-vp.gore?
>>>
>
>>Don't bother.  He may be as wooden as a Sequoia, but he's not going to make the>boners that Our Boy has.
>
>He might, as long as Clinton remembers to change the Robo-VP's
>dilithium crystals every few months.

Hmmm... clever, I suppose. Still, It just doesn't hold a candle to the many
memorable moments given to us by the DQ himself...


21-SEP-88:  Quayle claims that "We're going to have the best-educated American
    people in the world."

25-APR-89:  Quayle, visiting American Samoa, tells natives, "You all look like
    happy campers to me.  Happy campers you are, happy campers you have been,
    and as far as I am concerned, happy campers you will always be."  Calls
    Pago Pago "Pogo Pogo."

22-MAY-89:  Quayle declares, "I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward
    more freedom and democracy -- but that could change."

23-MAR-90:  Quayle observes, "If we do not succeed, then we run the risk of
    failure."

 2-OCT-90:  Quayle observes, "from a historical basis, Middle East conflicts do
    not last a long time."

11-APR-91:  Quayle applauds the US victory in the Gulf War as "a stirring
    victory for the forces of aggression."

 6-DEC-91:  Quayle says of Sununu's departure, "This isn't a man who is leaving
    with his head between his legs."

... Nope, I fear we may never have another political figure quite as skull-
numbingly stupid as Dan Quayle.

>
>Michael
>"I rest easy in the knowledge that four years from now I'll be able to
>say, I told you so."

We'll be waiting, friend.
-- Matt Alexander
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cka52397@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Slartibartfast)
Subject: Re: All I have to say
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 22:44:05 GMT

In article <1992Nov8.082839.14947@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>In article <1992Nov6.155246.6682@rock.concert.net> toddwall@rock.concert.net (R. Todd Wall -- Catholic Diocese of Raleigh -- Computer Services) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov6.150207.6560@unislc.uucp> jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske) writes:
>>>
>>etc.etc.etc
>>>p.s. Seek some counseling
>>>
>>
>>I think the name of this group should be changed from alt.fan.dan-quayle to 
>>			ALT.BASH.DAN-QUAYLE 
>>
>>This title seems more appropriate.
>>
>
>Yes, since that is what is going on here for the most part.  A bunch of
>bullies picking on a decent, honest and intelligent, yes I said intellignet,
>man who cares greatly for his country. 
	^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

	Yeah, he cared enough to dodge the draft.  This conservative bs is 
really annoying.  If Quayle was so smart, why didn't he go to a better school?
It wasn't like he coldn't afford it.  Anyway, has he ever held a job that his 
daddy didn't get for him?  And the VP of the US isn't a real job.  No respons-
ibility, perfect for Quayle!

-- 
***RUSH***YES***FLOYD***PEARLJAM***METALLICA***STING***PAULSIMON***REM***U2***
*  "We are going to have the best educated American people in the World!" ;-)*
*   Vice President Dan Quayle  September 21, 1988 ;-)  Clinton 1996! ;-) ;-) *
*******(c-amin1@uiuc.edu)***Chintan Amin***UniversityofIllinois***GoIllini****
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: jdooley@maemaster.eng.uci.edu (John R. Dooley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Keywords: Flame, attraction of moths to
Date: 6 Nov 92 17:12:04 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of California, Irvine

In article <1992Nov6.060050.14746@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>In article <1992Nov5.145853.3199@gvl.unisys.com> train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov5.060351.24196@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>, rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu 
>>|> Unfortunately, Billy Boy & Gorey Al  won the election 
>>|> even though the people voted for Bush/Quayle. 
>>|>         [Blather deleted]
>>|> America: prepare to impeach Hillwilly & Al before it's too late!
>>
>>   Like I said, sore loser.
>
>No, I'm a realist who's ancestors were amongst this nation's founding
>fathers.  

And, you do your ancestors proud.  On what grounds do you advocate 
impeaching Clinton.  (Please, let them be constitutional.)
It looks like the grounds that your candidate lost, thus you are
a sore loser.

>I guess that this, coupled with the fact that I'm a WASP means
>that I'm automatically wrong and marked for extinction by the liberal
>leftist extremist democrats.  At least the Republicans do not cheat to
>win elections and are not cry-babies like Slick Willie is!  
>

Such incredible paranoia, son.  The point is that being a WASP and a
Son of the American Revolution doesn't automatically make you right. 

>Now, speaking of sore winners: even after they've won, the democrats
>are still bashing President Bush and his administration.  I suppose that
>this aspect of Gorey Al's acceptance speech is to be conveniently overlooked.  
>

Acceptance speech?  I don't remember the speech Gore gave at the
Democratic Convention.  I don't think I saw it.
I did see his victory speech Tuesday night.  I was forward-looking
and statesmanlike.

>One other big difference between Gorey Al and V.P. Dan Quayle: V.P. Quayle
>is an intelligent _gentleman_ whereas Gorey Al is a boorish creep 

What makes you say that?

>with a
>terminal case of rudeness who is conniving and street smart who has a
>disposition as pleasant as a militant feminist afflicted with P.M.S. and
>rabies.
>

Ah, this must be your idea of a _gentlemanly_ comment.  That explains
the comparison above.

John D.
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Complete this sentence
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 10:44:10 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


michael@albert.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin) writes:

> mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson) writes:

>    erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) writes:

>    >Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>    >> Naw, we need someone with EXPERIENCE... Nixon/Quayle in '96!!!
>    >> The stand-up comedian dream ticket!  :)

>    >Sorry to disappoint you; Nixon's been elected twice so he's ineligible.
>    >But Ford/Quayle, now there's a ticket with some real quotes file
>    >possibilities!

>    Then how about Quayle/Nixon?
> 
>    Can a two-term president serve again as VP? Or does the amendment
>    (can't remember which number) prohibit a two-term prez from ever
>    serving at the executive level again in *any* capacity?

> The U.S. Constitution prevents anyone from serving as V.P. who isn't
> constitutionally elegible to serve as President to begin with,
> so Nixon therefore couldn't. He could, though, serve as an executive
> advisor, or cabinet secretary, or somesuch. 

You're correct that the Constitution bars a person from being elected
V.P. if that person is ineligible to *serve* as president. However,
as far as presidential term limits go, strictly speaking the Constitution
only prevents a person from being *elected* president more than twice,
or from being *elected* more than once if that person has served more
than half of a term to which another person was elected. There really
is no bar to someone becoming president through a means other than election.

I'm sure everyone understands what the intent of the language is, though,
but in the unlikely event of someone like Nixon (or Reagan) running
for V.P. it might require a supreme court ruling to clarify the Constitutional
language. After all, it was an amendment hastily drawn by Congressional
Republicans anxious to prevent future FDRs, and they obviously didn't
foresee all the wierd permutations, especially in light of the subsequent
25th amendment, by which a president can appoint a V.P. to fill a vacancy.
(Although one may say, in the light of recent years, that the office
of vice president can be vacant even when it's occupied. :-)

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis)
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 06:03:51 GMT

In article <1992Nov2.050329.7475@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> twillis@ec.ecn.purdue.edu (Thomas E Willis) writes:

>it can only be a government of the people if the people participate.

Unfortunately, Billy Boy & Gorey Al  won the election even though the people 
did select President Bush and VP Quayle via the popular vote.  What a sad
time in history for America and the world this is.  Worse yet, Hillary will
also inhabit the White House (soon to become the Red House) and give Slick
Willie orders as to how he should run the nation.

>may the best candidate win...

He did, but he still lost. :-(  

America: prepare to impeach Hillwilly & Al before it's too late!




-- 
Robert D. Davis            |  VAX/VMS is a text-only adventure game.  If       
rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu  !  you win, you get to use UNIX.  If you fail, 
uunet!mystica!rdd          |  you get to use an IBM-PC running MeSsy-DOS
Telephone: 1-410-744-7964  !  with MeSsy-Windows or an Apple Macintosh.  
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bt@bailey.u.washington.edu (bt garner)
Subject: Re: Maybe we won't miss Dan so much...
Organization: Process Modeling Group
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 14:05:52 GMT

egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:
> stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton) writes:
>>Maybe not take care of small countries, but 30-40 SS agents just MIGHT
>>be enough to handle Tipper's hair products and makeup accessories.  *smirk*
>>(Aww I love ol' Tipper but come on...you know I"m right)
>
>Given Bill and Al's hair, the whole Secret Service must be schlepping
>the hair products.  Well, with the mousse and the pouffing, they may
>not have to worry about head shots.

Oh no, the White House is going to become the Big Hair House!

bt garner
Big hair scares me.
bt@cpac.washington.edu
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6474 alt.politics.bush:13517 alt.politics.clinton:16409