HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dgrove@axion.bt.co.uk (David Grove)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Nothing About Cricket!
Date: 12 Aug 92 15:27:58 GMT
Reply-To: dgrove@axion.bt.co.uk (David Grove)
Organization: British Telecom Research Labs


Sorry for writing this hear, but I've tried other newsgroups without success
and as an avid reader of and occasional contributor to RSC I hope none of you
kind chaps/chapesses would mind.

I'm a recent University graduate from Loughborough, England and (along with a
friend) intend to travel the world (or as much of it as is possible in the
time available) from November 92.

We will be needing places to stay (self-catering or otherwise) at most major
world cities for varying lengths of time so if you know of anywhere cheap (but
good) then please reply to me either via e-mail (not RSC) or to the address
below before 25th September 92.

Both of us are male, 23, non-smokers and generally good blokes (if a little
modest and financially worse for wear) wanting to see what the world really
has on offer.

We will also be seeking part-time work in bars, beaches, plantations
(whatever) and will be getting work permits wherever necessary.

If anyone has any information, advice or assistance that they can offer I would
be most grateful.

Apologies again for cluttering up RSC with such mail, but I had no-one else to
turn to!!!!!

Thanks,

Dave Grove.

P.S. Please note that any replies will be treated in strictest confidence and
     entirely non-committal.

e-mail: dgrove@axion.bt.co.uk

address: 29 Upperfield Drive
         Felixstowe
         Suffolk
         IP11 9LS
         England.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: aitken@cs.cornell.edu (William E. Aitken)
Subject: England Winter Contracts
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 03:27:21 GMT

The following players were offered Winter contracts by England

	Mark Ramprakash, Phil Tufnell, Neil Fairbrother

The following have been offered senior winter contracts

	Graham Gooch, Alex Stewart, Robin Smith, Jack Russell, 
        Phillip DeFreitas and Chris Lewis.

This does *not* mean that these players are going to India,
simply that they will be paid whether or not they are selected.
The contracts are worth ~15,000 pounds, the senior contracts, ~25000
pounds.
-- 
William E. Aitken <aitken@cs.cornell.edu>   | Formal verification is the 
{uw-beaver,rochester,decvax}!cornell!aitken |  future of computer science ---
Home: (607) 273-7810 Away : (607) 255-9206  | Always has been, always will be. 
===============================================================================
From: aapfl6!zulfiqar@aapfl1.attmail.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: ENG vs PAK ONE DAYS ON CABLE
Date: 21 Aug 1992 09:55:47 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

        
        DON'T  FORGET  PAKISTAN  VS  ENGLAND  ODI  THIS  SATURDAY 
         
                                ON  PPV 
 

        England vs Pakistan One Day Internationals would be televised
        by most of the cable companies throughout the US.

        Different companies are airing the matches at different times.
        Majority is showing it LIVE on AUGUST 22 (SATURDAY). Some would
        TAPE-DELAY the event by a few hours.

        The AUGUST 24 match may be TAPE-DELAYED and played on
        AUGUST  29 (SATURDAY). Some systems would show it LIVE.

        Your best bet would be to check with your local cable company
        to find the time and day of both the matches. I understand that
        the operators may not know yet because AVI has just struck deals
        with these companies. You might have to talk to your PPV MANAGER
        to get details.

        I also understand that the match would be SCRAMBLED and would not
        be distributed to satellite dish owners unless you make special
        advance arrangements with AVI @ (407) 239-8933.

        Different cable companies are charging different amounts. The
        range is from  $15 to $20.

        Some folks want to know what they can do if their cable company
        is unaware of the matches. I suggest that you call the PPV MANAGER
        of your company and let him/her know of your interest and ask them
        to contact AVI @ (407) 239-8933. It would not be a bad idea to
        give AVI the name/phone of your cable company's PPV MANAGER
        as well.

        In reply to someone's question, Sammons Communications has indicated
        that in towns where they operate there is no interest in cricket
        and so would not be carrying it. That is hard to believe.
        However, there are other companies in NJ, MA, NY carrying these
        games and are in close proximity.

        If anyone needs any further info. you can post it to rsc and I
        will see if I can get the answers.
From: cdcs@st-andrews.ac.UK (Colin@ib.rl.ac.uk D. C. Steele)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores
Subject: Sunday League 1992 August 16th
Followup-To: rec.sport.cricket
Date: 17 Aug 1992 19:55:38 +1000
Organization: Mail/News gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: munnari.oz.au


Sunday League 1992 August 16th
40 overs per side

At Chesterfield
Derbyshire 257-5 (CJ Adams 141, PD Bowler 56)
Kent 209 (37.2) (TR Ward 65, AE Warner 4w)
DERBYSHIRE won by 48 RUNS

At Hartlepool
Glamorgan 216-7 (SP James 63, MP Maynard 65)
Durham 200 (36)
GLAMORGAN won by 16 RUNS

At Colchester
Essex 176-7 (GA Gooch 55)
Nottinghamshire 165-6 (BC Broad 63)
ESSEX won by 11 RUNS

At Bournemouth
Hampshire 255-3 (RA Smith 61, TC Middleton 98)
Northamptonshire 174 (38.2) (RJ Bailey 64, SD Udal 4w)
HAMPSHIRE won by 81 RUNS

At Uxbridge
Yorkshire 194-6 (SA Kellett 68, SR Tendulkar 47)
Middlesex 195-5 (38.5) (MR Ramprakash 58, JD Carr 60*, SR Tendulkar 1w)
MIDDLESEX won by 5 WICKETS with 7 balls remaining

At Taunton
Worcestershire 125 (KH MacLeay 5-20)
Somerset 126-8 (39.3)
SOMERSET won by 2 WICKETS with 3 balls remaining

At The Oval
Surrey 207-5 (AJ Stewart 105*)
Leicestershire 210-5 (JJ Whitaker 118)
LEICESTERSIHRE won by 5 WICKETS

At Hove
Lancashire 173 (39.3)
Sussex 175-4 (38.4) (AP Wells 56, NJ Lenham 81*)
SUSSEX won by 6 WICKETS with 8 balls remaining


Table                   Pld.   Pts.
1    Middlesex           15     56    (Champions)
2    Essex               15     44
3    Somerset            15     36
     Hampshire           15     36
5    Kent                15     34
6    Surrey              15     32
     Worcestershire      15     32
     Warwickshire        15     32
9    Durham              15     30
     Sussex              15     30
     Derbyshire          15     30
12   Gloucestershire     15     28
13   Yorkshire           15     26
     Lancashire          15     26
15   Northamptonshire    15     24
16   Glamorgan           15     18
17   Nottinghamshire     15     14
18   Leicestershire      15     12


T
From: cdcs@st-andrews.ac.UK (Colin@ib.rl.ac.uk D. C. Steele)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores
Subject: County Championship 1992 August 14,15,17
Followup-To: rec.sport.cricket
Date: 18 Aug 1992 18:47:53 +1000
Organization: Mail/News gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: munnari.oz.au

County Championship 1992 August 14,15,17

At Chesterfield
Derbyshire (6) 207
and 334-2 (KJ Barnett 160, JE Morris 55, TJG O'Gorman 62*)
Kent (7) 295 (TR Ward 87, NR Taylor 71, IR Bishop 5-60)
MATCH DRAWN

At Hartlepool
Glamorgan (8) 396-9 dec (H Morris 126, A Dale 68, A Cottey 91)
Durham (4) 201
and (Following on) 313-7 (W Larkins 140, P Bainbridge 56, MP Briers 52)
MATCH DRAWN

At Colchester
Nottinghamshire (3) 249 (PR Pollard 65, CL Cairns 80, JP Stephenson 5w)
and 130 (PM Such 6-39, JH Childs 4w)
Essex (24) 416-6 (JP Stephenson 74, PJ Prichard 136, JJB Lewis 53*)
ESSEX won by an INNINGS and 37 RUNS

At Bournemouth
Hampshire (5) 260 (KD James 74, RA Smith 62, KM Curran 6-45)
and 100 (JP Taylor 7-23)
Northamptonshire (6) 338-8 dec (AJ Lamb 160, D Ripley 57, MD Marshall 4-49)
and 23-0
NORTHAMPTONSHIRE won by 10 WICKETS

At Uxbridge
Yorkshire (5) 286 (SR Tendulkar 82, PCR Tufnell 4-92)
and 194-4 dec (SR Tendulkar 77*)
Middlesex (23) 250-6 dec (DL Haynes 83, PN Weekes 64*)
and 234-6 (MR Ramprakash 94)
MIDDLESEX won by 6 WICKETS

At The Oval
Leicestershire (22) 216 (V Wells 56, NJ Kendrick 6-61)
and 267-5 (RP Gofton 75)
Surrey (6) 218 (MA Lynch 106, GJ Parsons 6-70, AD Mullally 4-56)
and 193 (L Potter 4-73)
LEICESTERSHIRE won by 72 RUNS


TABLE

                       Pld.  Won  Btg.  Blg.  Pts.

1   Essex               17    8    52    46   226
2   Leicestershire      18    7    32    50   194
3   Northamptonshire    17    6    51    42   189
4   Kent                17    6    48    39   183
5   Middlesex           17    5    53    49   182
6   Warwickshire        17    5    44    56   180

7   Nottinghamshire     16    6    41    39   176
8   Derbyshire          17    5    36    47   163
9   Sussex              17    4    50    48   162
10  Hampshire           17    4    49    42   155
11  Yorkshire           17    4    42    45   151
12  Surrey              17    4    47    38   149

13  Gloucestershire     17    4    34    48   146
14  Somerset            16    3    47    47   142
15  Worcestershire      17    3    42    47   137
16  Lancashire          18    2    60    42   134
17  Glamorgan           16    3    40    38   126
18  Durham              18    2    36    46   114




Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: wicks@meena.cc.uregina.ca
Subject: PAK-vs REST OF THE WORLD in Toronto
Organization: University of Regina, Regina, Sask., Canada
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 15:37:08 GMT

Could someone tell me how and where one could get tickets for this match. Who do you have to contact. And also the start time of the match.
From: shaw@computing-science.aberdeen.ac.uk (Adrian Y Cymro Shaw)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Third One Day International, Lunchtime score
Date: 20 Aug 1992 07:32:06 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Pakistan won toss and elected to field.

England
-------
Gooch       b. Waqar          42
Stewart     c. Wasim b. Waqar 24
Smith       not out           53
Fairbrother not out           25
Extras                        28
                             ---
Total (off 32 overs)         172

Smith hit two enormous sixes this morning in a fast scoring session.
At this rate England could be looking for a score around 300.

Adrian D. Shaw      * Currently studying MSc in AI at Aberdeen
shaw@uk.ac.abdn.csd * Address: Computing Science Department,
                    * Meston Building, Old Aberdeen, Scotland
From: pvr@argo.rice.edu (PVR Narasimha Rao)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Correction (Re: RESULT: Opinion Poll: Indian Team Selection)
Date: 22 Aug 1992 05:49:58 GMT
Organization: Rice University


In article <BtDE3t.Dx0@rice.edu>, I wrote:


|> Here are the results of the opinion poll. Thanks to all those who
|> participated in it. There were 48 entries.


|> Does Chetan Sharma deserve another chance? (47)           6.2500     53.7500
|> 
|> 	[note: This was "the closest" verdict in the poll]
|> 
|> Should Vivek Razdan be recalled for the test team? (46)   5.4348     54.5652
|> 
|> Should Atul Wasson be recalled? (46)                      1.3043     78.6957


The 3 numbers in the first column above should be 46.2500, 45.4348 and 21.3043
respectively. I am sorry for the error.


|> This is likely to be my last post to this newsgroup for a long time to


OK, it wasn't, but this one will be!


|> come. Good luck to you all and your favorite teams (and favorite
|> players)!

|> --------
|> PVR Narasimha [ Good luck SRT
|>                 Good bye  RSC ] Rao


--------
PVR Narasimha [ Good luck SRT
                Good bye  RSC ] Rao
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@.bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4813,,21272)
Subject: Re: It's all over!
Reply-To: shamim@.bellcore.com
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 21:24:02 GMT

In article 713646911@bronto.cs.duke.edu,  azhar@duke.cs.duke.edu (D. Salman [Quintessential] Azhar) writes:
>	   "My sources tell" (which are very reliable tell me) that
>originally Boycott was kidding Rashid that he couldn't cross 20. Later
>when money and bets were proposed Boycott raised the score to 35. Was
>that a separate incident, or is SAN telling an abridged anecdote?
>
>dsqa
There were several stages of kidding on this bet but the final stage was indeed 
a fiver for 35 runs. Note that when Aaqib came in to bat, Latif still needed 
something like 5 runs to get to 35. So Boycott was sitting pretty. 

I really liked Boycott's gesture of getting the note framed and giving Latif a 
nice inscription. 

As you well know, Azhar, there are a lot of things that go on in dressing rooms 
that can not be reported. :-)

	--SAN
From: cdcs@st-andrews.ac.uk (Colin D. C. Steele)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: County Championship 1992 August 18 (Tuesday)
Date: 18 Aug 92 23:13:57 GMT
Organization: St. Andrews University, Scotland.

County Championship 1992 August 18 (Tuesday)
Day 1 of 3

At Chesterfield
Glamorgan (1) 170 (PA Cottey 62, DE Malcolm 5-45)
Derbyshire (4) 93-2

At Colchester
Surrey (3) 292 (DJ Bicknell 53, MA Lynch 102, PM Such 4w)
Essex (4) 25-0

At Bristol
Gloucestershire (4) 346 (THC Hancock 82, Vaughan 99, DJ Capel 4w)
v Northamptonshire (3)

At Bournemouth
Hampshire (4) 341-8 (MCJ Nicholas 95, JR Ayling 57, AN Aymes 53, JE Emburey 5w)
v Middlesex (3)

At Leicester
Kent (4) 414-3 (MR Benson 139, NR Taylor 144)
v Leicestershire (0)

At Weston-Super-Mare
Somerset (3) 293-9 (RP Snell 75, RD Stemp 5w)
v Worcestershire (4)

At Birmingham
Warwickshire (2) 203 (AJ Moles 86, RG Twose 53, M Watkinson 4w)
Lancashire (4) 70-0

At Nottingham
Nottinghamshire (3) 152 (CL Cairns 69, SR Tendulkar 1w)
Yorkshire (4) 144-5 (SR Tendulkar 22)

Matches continue Wednesday, Thursday
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: asad@athena.mit.edu (Asad A Naqvi)
Subject: Pak vs Eng,4th ODI at Lords
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 22:18:57 GMT


Pakistan - 204 for 5 in 50 overs
England  -  15 for 1 in  2 overs


The match is reduced to 50 overs because of rain.

In Pakistan's Innings , Malik made 48 and Miandad made 50 n.o.


England started aggressively with Botham hitting 4's of the first
three balls of the innings. However, Stewart was out LBW without
scoring.

The match will continue tommorrow.
From: sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Pakistani captains
Date: 20 Aug 1992 14:34:54 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

 Why not Zaheer as one of the best Pakistani captains? He did'nt have a wealth of 
talent in his team, did he? At least not compared to what Mushtaq, Imran or Miandad
had. And he did a competent job - did'nt lose too many.
  Of course, he was an ultra-defensive captain - but so was Gavaskar. And Sunny has,
probably, the best record among Indian captains. And quite a few people would throw
his name in the ring when queried about Indian captains!!!!

Sudhama
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: andyc@is.morgan.com (Andrew Coad)
Subject: Re: Cricket as an Olympic Sport
Organization: Morgan Stanley - IS
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 16:36:21 GMT

In article <1992Jul30.001738.21785@vlsisj.uucp>, harish@vlsisj.uucp (Harish Balan) writes:
|> In article <1992Jul23.090951@is.morgan.com>, andyc@is.morgan.com (Andrew
|> Coad) writes:
|> |> In my opinion no team sport (with possibly the exception of the relay
|> - which
|> |> i don't classify as a *team* sport anyway) should be part of the
|> Olympics. The
|> |> Olympics was always to do with the achievement of the individual not the
|> |> collective efforts of the 'Harlem Globetrotters'.
|> |> 
|> |> So i'm glad cricket is not on the roster.
|> 
|> 	Excuse me - but what about these sports
|> 
|> 	  - Team Gymnastic Competition
|> 	  - Soccer
|> 	  - Pretty much all the rowing events
|> 

Excuse me, but did you read the first sentence of my posting? We should have a term for folks who reply without reading. How about IDRTPS (I Didn't Read The Posting Syndrome)? or RTGP (Read The Goddam Posting)?

|> 	Also, I am not sure if the Olympics were "always about individual 
|> achievement".

I can tell from your first comment that you are not sure.

  If that is the case, it ought to be changed - for the better.
|> 
|>
Go ahead, change it.

AC
From: rahin@scs.leeds.ac.uk (M A Rahin)
Subject: Re: The Best Captain (Re: Pakistan: 200 not out.......
Organization: The University of Leeds, School of Computer Studies
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 92 14:40:03 GMT

>In article <16AUG199221281018@zeus.tamu.edu> m0a1530@zeus.tamu.edu (ABBAS, MUSTAFA) writes:
>there is hardly any doubt about the best captain for pakistan. Based on 
>statistics, yes, miandad is best but QUALATIVELY imran is surely the 
>best. In fact, arguably the best captain for any country. Isn't (or 
>wasn't) he?.
>


Well, according to the new Guiness Book of Records on Cricket Captains most of 
the ex-pakistani test players & captains feel that Javed Miandad is the best
captain Pakistan ever had.

- Rahin

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: aapfl6!zulfiqar@aapfl1.attmail.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: PAK, ENG  ONE DAYS ON PPV
Date: 21 Aug 1992 10:13:30 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

        DON'T  FORGET  PAKISTAN  VS  ENGLAND  ODI  THIS  SATURDAY

                                ON  PPV


        England vs Pakistan One Day Internationals would be televised
        by most of the cable companies throughout the US.

        Different companies are airing the matches at different times.
        Majority is showing it LIVE on AUGUST 22 (SATURDAY). Some would
        TAPE-DELAY the event by a few hours.

        The AUGUST 24 match may be TAPE-DELAYED and played on
        AUGUST  29 (SATURDAY). Some systems would show it LIVE.

        Your best bet would be to check with your local cable company
        to find the time and day of both the matches. I understand that
        the operators may not know yet because AVI has just struck deals
        with these companies. You might have to talk to your PPV MANAGER
        to get details.

        I also understand that the match would be SCRAMBLED and would not
        be distributed to satellite dish owners unless you make special
        advance arrangements with AVI @ (407) 239-8933.

        Different cable companies are charging different amounts. The
        range is from  $15 to $20.

        Some folks want to know what they can do if their cable company
        is unaware of the matches. I suggest that you call the PPV MANAGER
        of your company and let him/her know of your interest and ask them
        to contact AVI @ (407) 239-8933. It would not be a bad idea to
        give AVI the name/phone of your cable company's PPV MANAGER
        as well.

        In reply to someone's question, Sammons Communications has indicated
        that in towns where they operate there is no interest in cricket
        and so would not be carrying it. That is hard to believe.
        However, there are other companies in NJ, MA, NY carrying these
        games and are in close proximity.

        If anyone needs any further info. you can post it to rsc and I
        will see if I can get the answers.
From: sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Aussie bowling
Date: 19 Aug 1992 09:43:26 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

John Michael McMullan writes:
Why does everyone think New Zealand is such a hard place to tour?
We have a very nice climate in summer, appreciative crowds and
reasonable umpires (at least I hope they are...)
_________________________________________________________________

  Nothing derogatory/critical was intended in my comment that NZ is probably 
thr toughest tour to undertake. In general, the pitches in NZ are quite
different from Australia (am I wrong on this one?) and quite often (speaking
from India's experience) a tour of NZ occurs immediately after an Australia
visit. Then, the NZ team as a whole does much better at home (who does'nt, you
may ask) - at home, NZ can take on anyone. As far as umpiring goes, the only
thing which I have heard which is worth talking about is that the interpretation
of LBWs is done differently - Indian spinners have always felt at a loss for
this.
  Appreciative crowds - definitely. From whatever I saw of the World Cup on
TV. About the rest, I guess I am ill-informed about NZ - so I don't know.

Sudhama
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: kre@cs.mu.oz.au (Robert Elz)
Subject: Re: SL vs Aus
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 03:19:19 GMT

In <1992Aug17.141521.18236@walter.bellcore.com> shamim@.bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4813,,21272) writes:

| Nettors with better information access are kindly requested to post news. 
| Perhaps Robert Elz?

If I had any I'd post them, unfortunately, as others have pointed out,
there is almost no coverage here at all, just occasional 30 second
items on the news that give no details --- we'll get much better
coverage of the Pak v Eng one day games that are coming.

| In the ODI over this weekend, SL beat Aus in a close game. Aus batting first 
| made 240+.

247 I think, M.Taylor and M.Waugh scored most of the runs.

| SL's reply apparently a great innings by De Silva who clobbered 

251 with less than an over to go I vaguelly recall.

kre
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: andyc@is.morgan.com (Andrew Coad)
Subject: Re: New York Cricket (Pak vs ROW)
Organization: Morgan Stanley - IS
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 18:53:05 GMT

In article <1992Aug14.145557.20199@Princeton.EDU>, sguha@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Saumyen Guha) writes:
|> In article <1992Aug14.095158@is.morgan.com> andyc@is.morgan.com (Andrew Coad) writes:
|> > [stuff deleted] ....


|> What kind of joke is this? I hardly see any regular bowler in ROW team.
|> Is this team correct? As I have pointed, only two regular bowlers. I
|> guess, SRT,Ramprakash,Aza,Lara will serve as other bowlers. This 
|> is going to be a real joke against a full strength pakistan team.
|> 

Well, you're not the only person to figure that out. But thats what the organisers
are saying right now. If you wish I will fax you the brochure. However, i wouldn't
take it too seriously. matches like this in New York have a nasty habit of turning
out not quite as you might expect from advance promos. I would be surprised if
more than half the listed Pak players are actually sighted on the day! And as another netter pointed out, the ROW team looks more like the first names that
came to mind .... judging from past experiences, the organisers probably get 4 or
5 key players actually signed up, then fill in the rest with little thought and
certainly no guarantee of their appearance. Tell you what, why not call the
organisers and ask them who's going to bowl? See what they say.

Andrew Coad
From: KSRAO@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: ODI 3 Pak v England England after 10 overs
Date: 20 Aug 1992 05:31:38 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu



    SAlim Malik won the toss for Pakistan and sent England to bat. They are 43
for no loss after 10overs.

Gooch   23
Stewert 13
Extras   8

Total 43 for no loss after 10overs
Akram has given 18 runs off his five opvers and Aquib has given 21

There is going to be a bowling change for the 11th over. Waqar in place of
Akram.


Rao