HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: scott.hollifield@the-matrix.com (Scott Hollifield) 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Starfleet Medical
Date: 18 Dec 92 19:26:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The MATRIX BBS - Birmingham, AL - 205-323-2016
Reply-To: scott.hollifield@the-matrix.com (Scott Hollifield) 

On 15 Dec 92 22:36:33 GMT, cstone@husc8.harvard.edu (christopher stone)
writes:

CS>>>Some might be promoted to Starfleet Admiralty positions.  Perhaps
CS>>>Scott would be some kind of Hyman Rickover.
CS>>>
CS>>>McCoy might run some Starfleet office of alien medicine.>
CS>>Would this be part of Starfleet Medical?  Seriously, if you watch
CS>>TNG: "Encounter at Farpoint", you'll see someone who looks a lot like
CS>>.. oh, hell, Paramount *said* that "the Admiral" was McCoy

CS>Yes.  Also, I am wondering if McCoy didn't die early in the
CS>second season, and that is the reason Beverly Crusher became head

Without dragging out my tape of "Farpoint", I'm pretty sure that it was
implied or stated that McCoy was a retired Surgeon-General of Starfleet.
Yes, I know he was conducting an inspection of the sickbay, but I'm sure
he could do that after retirement.  (Besides, I have a feeling that the
inspection was probably honorary.)

Besides, Surgeon-General does not equal "head of Starfleet Medical", the
vague phrase used to explain Beverly's year-long absence.  And doesn't
it strike anyone odd that they'd give such a position, whatever it may
exactly be, to a medical officer who was still practicing and hadn't
already slid into administration? - and one with a commander's rank at
that!  In my mind's little retconned TNG universe, I prefer to think
that Beverly was simply appointed to some nominal administrative post
-- not THE head.

                                ###########################################
                                # "Let us think the unthinkable, let us   #
#################################  do the undoable.  Let us prepare to    #
# scott.hollifield@the-matrix.com  grapple with the ineffable itself, and #
#################################  see if we may not eff it after all."   #
                                #                 -- Dirk Gently          #
                                ###########################################

---
 . OLX 2.1 TD . Didn't I flirt with you last week on Deck 11? . Riker
                                                                                                                        
From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:04:34 GMT
Subject: Re: Troi blown! Jelico cool! Spot DSN? READ!!!
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current

>Spot the cat goes to Deep Space Nine as the official mascot!!!
>He is Lt. Commander of the Cat Forces!

Would those happen to be the same cat forces found in Red Dwarf?  I can't 
wait! B)
From: lawson%ssdvax.decnet@lbgwy.mdc.com (Jim Lawson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: DSN airs Jan 5 in Los Angeles
Date: 15 Dec 92 14:37:25 GMT
Reply-To: Lawson%ssdvax.decnet@lbgwy.mdc.com
Organization: MDSSC-SSD
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]

At 8:00 p.m.

--
Jim Lawson	Lawson%ssdvax.decnet@lbgwy.mdc.com
		Alt:	Lawson@netsun.mdc.com or Lawson@bbs.ug.eds.com

Opinions/Comments expressed here are my own and no one elses !!
From: baxter@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Cardassians first appearance on STTNG?
Date: 15 Dec 92 18:36:47 CST
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

Now that we are seeing more of the Cardassians, I must admit that I
don't remember the first time they were introduced in STTNG.  

Can someone refresh my memory and tell me the episode that this was
in so I can pull out the tape and see how they were introduced and
depicted at that time.

Thanks.
From: Peter_A_David@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: A Christmas Carol
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 04:22:02 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world

I've heard nothing but good things about "Christmas Carol."  And I'm
going on Christmas Eve.

PAD
From: ericw@hobbes.amd.com (Eric Wedaa)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Ah HA! (Or why do federation phasers always hit their target)
Date: 14 Dec 92 18:41:12 GMT
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

I was watching TV last night and saw some random show about "Fighter Jets"
and realized why the Federation Phasers always hit (And track) their targets,
while everyone elses always miss.  (Really, Why is it that everytime Riker
and "The Evil Alien Being" get into a shoot out, the alien always misses,
and Riker only needs one shot to stun the alien.)

Federation Hand Phasers come equiped with RADAR Lock, ECM, and a gyroscopic
interface to track the target as the target and/or Riker are moving!!!

>>>>Ericw
(This certainly ranks up there with "Why is there sound in space?")
(OK, so sue me,  I haven't had enought coffee yet, and I didn't want to
start a flame war over why TNG is so much better/worse than TOS)
--
Eric Wedaa  -  eric.wedaa@amd.com | Two more kinds of lies...
{ames apple uunet}!amd!ericw      |     Release Dates, and Benchmarks
Advanced Micro Devices, M/S 167 PO Box 3453 Sunnyvale, CA 94088-3453
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ratner@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Dave "Van Damme" Ratner)
Subject: Re: The Official Dorm-Rec Review of "Chain of Command -1" (spoilers)
Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department
Date: 15 Dec 92 20:55:05 GMT

butch@geohub.gcn.uoknor.edu (H. G. "Butch" Walker Jr.) writes:

>Spoilers ahead
Spoiler Protection (^L) added



















>In article <BzADJJ.D89@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>,
>myempire@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Matt J. Martin) writes:
>|>
>|>  We're back!  And we're happy!  
>|>
>|>  This was, quite simply, the most outstanding episode this season!  
>Agreed!
>|>
>|>  Spoilers ahead.  
>|>
>|>
>|>  We love Captain Jelico! 

>I, too, really like Jelico.  I really see him a someone who is thrown
>into a really difficult situation in which, while he'd probably like
>to try to make a smooth transition, he has to get the Ent ready for
>the possibility of war.  He seemed to really understand what Troi was
>saying, but didn't have the time to do it.  The Enterprise might be 
>about to enter the initial battle of a Cardassian war, and they can't 
>afford to be lax.

I disagree.  When he was talking to Troi, I got the feeling he
was simply making her THINK he was listening to her, but had no intention
of ever taking or using her advice.  The same with advice from the
other senior staff officers.  He pretends to listen, but really has
no intention of changing his plans. 

>Anyway, I loved it and can't wait for part II.  It really looks like an
>wonderfully uncomfortable episode.
>--
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------

>	- In this world, you must be oh, so smart or, oh, so pleasant.
>		For years, I was smart.
>			I recommend pleasant
>				-- Elwood P. Dowd (Harvey)

>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
-- 
* *  ***  *     *    |   Dave "Van Damme" Ratner
* *  *    *    * *  / \  ratner@cs.ucla.edu
* *  *    *    ***  \ /  
***  ***  ***  * *   |   "Wham Bam, thank you Van Damme!"	
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: myempire@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Matt J. Martin)
Subject: Re: Troi is capable of wearing a uniform (SPOILERS)
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:18:30 GMT

In article <BzADDt.Lw7@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens) writes:
>told to wear one.  Out of all the obviously mean orders the new capt.  
>has given, this is the only one I wished had been given on the first  
>episode.
>
>Troi wearing a uniform while on duty?  Gee, who'd ever guess that?   
>It's not like she's special or something.  She's a member of the crew  
>(even had to take acting control of the ship when it was just her, Ro  
>and O'Brien) and therefore she should have been wearing one all along.
>
>To answer a few lame rebuttals before they begin:
>
>Rebuttal: But she's the ship's counselor!  And she has empathic powers!
>Response: So?  Why does that mean that she doesn't wear a uniform like  
>all the rest of the crew wear?
>
>Rebuttal: She wears that so people can more easily see her breasts.
>Response: What part do her breasts have in the show?
>
>Rebuttal: She wore one when she was some years older.
>Response: And up to this show, that fact really helped in interpreting  
>the show as both agist and sexist; very much saying that older women  
>officers are less attractive so they'd better wear a uniform to cover  
>their unsightly breasts.
>

  How about this?  She doesn't wear the uniform when conducting counseling
sessions so she can overcome the rank barrier.  If some pion crewmen needs some
counseling, he's going to be damn hesitant to spill his guts to a superior
officer.  So to make her patients feel more at east, no uniform.

  If you listened closely, you would've noticed that Jelico ordered her to
wear the uniform when on the bridge.  Obviously, Picard respected her wishes
not to wear the uniform during counseling sessions and let her wear forego
the uniform on the bridge so she wouldn't have to change clothes just to talk
to the captain.  Obviously, Jelico thinks otherwise.  Hurrayy!!

  By the way, I hate Troi.


---
  ##########################################################################   
  ##   /   ##               Progress Before Peace!               ##   /   ## 
  ##  //   ## Matt J. Martin, Technosociology and Space Politics ##  //   ## 
  ## ///// ######################################################## ///// ##
  ##   //  ##        Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN       ##   //  ##
  ##   /   ##           myempire@mentor.cc.purdue.edu            ##   /   ##
  ##########################################################################
From: 01lucas@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Prime Time Entertainment Network (PTEN)?
Date: 17 Dec 92 15:58:16 -0400
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In article <1992Dec17.172133.4942@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael Rosen) writes:
> I just saw an ad for something called PTEN on Washington Channel 20
> with what looked like several sci fi schows - something called Time
> Trax (looked like Patrick Swayze), Babylon 5 (that I've seen talk
> about on the net, never seen it).  Has anybody heard of this?

Yes, it's the new "fifth network" from Warner Bros.  It will be carrying the 
show and movie mentioned above.  B5 might also turn into a series, possibly 
starting off a second night of programming.  Time Trax looks similar to 
Quantum Leap, but I haven't heard much about it.  For more infoon B5 and Time 
Trax, pick up the February issue of Cinefantastique.  (It should be in stores 
now)

BTW, PTEN stands for Prime Time Entertainment Network.

*****************************************************************************
Lucas Dambergs    (****************D  _______---------______ 
      aka          /     /___________/    ___         ______) 
The Supreme Cow   (_________             /   ---------         "Engage..."
                            \___________/                         
01lucas@ac.dal.ca
Absence makes the heart grow fungus.    -- The Barenaked Ladies
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, North America, Sol III (Earth), Terran System
*****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: plutnj@aix.rpi.edu (James Matthew Plutnicki)
Subject: Re: Troi's Rank Canonized (*SPOILERS* For CoCPtI)
Keywords: Troi Rank
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 15:44:15 GMT

In article <BzAD65.Lq3@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jlindqui@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Body Double for Aunt Esther) writes:
>NOTE Distribution!  I don't need the damn international community flaming me
>again for posting spoilers that the poor suckers won't see for five years...
>
>

>And a second ^L, just for good measure...  Merry Christmas, y'all!


>Yes, you can put aside your recurring surveys as to Counselor Troi's rank,
>as tonight in "Chain of Command, Part I" we have Ronny Cox explicitly refer
>to her as "Lieutenant Commander Deanna Troi".  She also wore three and a half
>pips on her regulation uniform...                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
THREE AND A HALF!!!!!  What the hell is THREE and a half.  Commander is
three pips, look at Riker...  Does this mean the she outranks Riker somehow???
Either you made an error and she only had TWO AND A HALF pips or someone made
a huge costuming error...


-- 
 * James M. Plutnicki (plutnj@rpi.edu) * "There are no truths, only facts  *
 * Computer Systems Engineering Major  * blurred by opinion."   --Me       *
 * Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    * "Confucius say,'Virginity like    * 
 * OS/2 advocate and user...:)         * balloon one prick all gone'."     *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: rohrernl@helix.nih.gov (Nathan Rohrer)
Subject: Re: Lwaxana - Who plays her?
Organization: National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:26:59 GMT

In article <92353.140742MCGLONE@auvm.american.edu> <MCGLONE@auvm.american.edu> writes:

>I am sorry if there is a better place to find out this info, but I
>am fairly new to the net, and I didn't see anyhting in the FAQ lists
>in here or in rec.arts.startrek.info.

>Please settle a bet - who plays Lwaxana Troi?

>A friend claims this is Gene Roddenbury's wife who plays the computer
>voice now and used to be the nurse on the original series.  I claim
>it is someone different.  Dinner is riding on this one!

>Please email any help to MCGLONE@AMERICAN.EDU or MCGLONE@AUVM

>Thank You!
>Colleen McGlone

I hope you get paid on Friday :-) .



/*********************************************************************/
/*                       --- Nathan Rohrer ---                       */
/*  NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE, OFFICE OF SCIENCE POLICY AND LEGISLATION */
/*              MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECTION               */
/* BITNET: NLR@NIHNEI31                  BETHESDA, MD 20892-0031     */
/* INTERNET: rohrernl@helix.nih.gov      NIH 3Com: NLR:NEI31:NIH     */
/* CompuServe: 70670,3164                PHONE: 301 496-2194         */
/*********************************************************************/
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: scottb@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com (Scottb)
Subject: Re: Phased and cloaked ** SPOILERS **
Organization: United Technologies Research Center
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1992 20:36:35 GMT

Very good question.  I have wondered the same thing myself.
I have come to the conclusion: it was/wasn't in the plot.
-- 
Disclaimer:  I didn't do it!  Nobody saw me do it!  You can't prove anything! 
             My opinions are my own.   They do not reflect anyone/thing else!
\/       preferred        \/
scottb%nw8550@utrcgw.utc.com            |           sdb@rcinet.utc.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman)
Subject: Re: Episode Argument
Organization: The Admiral's Unix System & The Grid BBS
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:39:42 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.185927.9395@iscsvax.uni.edu> hodge3726@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:
>Having an argument.  What was the name of the episode where Riker gets trapped
>in some alien holodeck and is convinced he is trapped by Romulans, latter to
>find out it is some kids playhouse set up by his parents.

"Future Imperfect"


-- 
"Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ray, when somebody asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" -- Winston Zeddmore
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Female CO for the E  II
Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 02:37:24 GMT

In article <1992Dec21.000354.4261@netfs.dnd.ca> bvan@ncs.dnd.ca (Bryan Van Blaricom) writes:
:   Some that quickly spring to mind are:
:
:   Dr. Leah Brahms
:   The captain of the Enterprise C
:   Beverly Crusher
:   Tasha Yar
:   Dr. Pulaski
:   The commander from BOBW (a bit ambitious, perhaps, but still very
:       competent :-)

Una Carapleides? :-)

G
From: ynecelc@sx.mont.nec.com (Ellison Chan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Female CO for the E
Date: 16 Dec 92 19:50:25 GMT
Organization: HNSX Supercomputers

In article <1992Dec16.173703.23319@u.washington.edu> gwangung@carson.u.washington.edu (Roger Tang) writes:
>In article <1992Dec16.154100.9599@sernews.raleigh.ibm.com> dcbii@rob.raleigh.ibm.com () writes:
>>I have a feeling some of you wouldn't be satisfied unless the show had a
>>minority dominated universe, or some such.
>
>	"minorities" dominate the world.  So what?
>

The word "minority" would no longer apply if they were dominant.
Unless you mean something else when you say: minority.

Get this this thread of r.a.s.c., it smells of discrimination!
-- 
Ellison Chan, Comp. Sys. Analyst               2350 Place TransCanadienne
HNSX Supercomputers Inc., NEC Corp.        Dorval, Quebec, Canada H9P 2X5
E-mail: ellison@SX.Mont.NEC.COM          (514)684-7705, FAX (514)684-8619
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: rwmech@uumeme.chi.il.us (Robert W. Mech)
Subject: Klingon From ST:VI In CoC (no spoilers)
Organization: UUMEME Public Access Xenix
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 92 23:25:18 GMT


Did anyone else notice that the one of the actors in the COC episode was 
actualy the klingon (obviously as another person) that played the Chancelor
of the Klingon empire before he got killed. (The one that McCoy tried to 
save) It sounded just like him, I dont know the actors name, but can
anyone confirm this?

Rob
-- 
:*: rwmech@uumeme.chi.il.us | Owner/Adminstrator UUMEME Public Access Xenix :*:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: kgdykes@thinkage.on.ca (Ken Dykes)
Subject: Re: 'Batman" meets 'Trek'
Organization: Thinkage Ltd.
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 11:50:04 GMT

In article <78624@hydra.gatech.EDU> ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz) writes:
>In article <1992Dec17.105458.1392@galaxy.gov.bc.ca> bclarke@galaxy.gov.bc.ca writes:
>
>>WHAT?!? Are you joking? No, he [Khan] was a human from the late 20th cent...
>BTW, it's almost 1993.  How much longer do we have before the war starts?
>(the one that Khan was in)?

the UUgenics war ?
we want our bio-entities 8bit clean!

-- 
   - Ken Dykes, Thinkage Ltd., Kitchener, Ontario, Canada    [43.47N 80.52W]
         kgdykes@thinkage.on.ca   postmaster@thinkage.com   thinkage!kgdykes
         harley-request@thinkage.on.ca             kgdykes@math.uwaterloo.ca
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.current:20601 ne.general:3475
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,ne.general
Subject: Re: DS9 in boston area?
From: glazier@isr.harvard.edu (Andrew Baker Glazier)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 17:15:59 GMT
Organization: Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

>>Heh heh, we get it before you do. *niko*
>>  L.A. gets Deep Space Nine Jan. 5th for the 2-hr premiere, channel 13, 
>>KCOP
>>:::::Larry:::::
>>
>>--
>>Larry Greenfield (bbs.lar@tsoft.net)
>
>For the New England readers...
>
>I think I saw an ad on WWOR (on cable) that they will be showing
>Deep Space Nine, but I don't recall when the premiere will be shown.
>
>Jim Kowalczyk                    James_J_Kowalczyk@cup.portal.com
>Andover, MA
In mid-January on 56, I think.

-- 
"A horse! A horse! Somebody give me a horse, man, because|glazier@ 
I come to bury this dirtball, not to praise him. Whaddya |harvard.isr.edu
think I am? Whether it's nobler for the mind to make people suffer with all
these totally outrageous arrows arrows for a fortune, or what!" -- D.R.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: rbeck@mordordseg.ti.com (Ron Beck)
Subject: Re: A must to see  (hear)
Reply-To: rbeck@mordor.dseg.ti.com
Organization: is an esoteric concept.
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 16:32:37 GMT

In article <1992Dec11.171902.6926@gw.wmich.edu>, x92paszek@gw.wmich.edu writes:
|> Now, how is it, that the Enterprise houses over 1000, and not once have we seen
|> a toilet?
|> 
|> Picture this:
|> Camera pulls away from an unmarked door.  As the camera stops when the full
|> door is shown, you hear a futuristic-sounding flush.   Seconds later, Captain
|> Peckard (sp?) comes out, fixing his uniform as he so often does. He looks
|> around, and begins walking away.
|> 
|> 
|> Maybe at that point Data passes the captain, says "excuse me', and walks in the
|> bathroom himself.  A perplexed captain goes to the bridge.
|> 
|> I think this kind of everyday life and comedy is lacking from TNG.   I want a
|> toilet scene, and I want it now.
|> 
|> 
|> M.M.M.P.
|> 
Watch DeepSpace 9.  I saw a short informational piece on the show on
the SciFi channel this weekend.  They said that there would be
bathroom scenes.  Should be interesting.  They also said there would
be more non-humanoid species shown.  I look forward to January!
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ronald J. Beck           | IP rbeck@mordor.dseg.ti.com |Do now what others
Member, Group Tech Staff | MaBell (214) 952-4566       |won't so you can do
Texas Instruments        |                             |later what others
McKinney, Texas          |                             |can't
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: smccoy@dw3v.ess.harris.com (Scott McCoy)
Subject: Re: Ferengi History question
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 21:48:39 GMT
Organization: Harris Corporation Information Systems Division

Anthony E. Wright writes:
|> 
|> However, later episodes call this episode into question. Apparently, Picard had
|> had first contact with the Ferengi previously, when commanding the Stargazer.
|> Apparently, this is when the "Picard Manuever" was created, and Picard blew
|> up the Ferengi ship, since it started firing on the Stargazer first. 

First of all, Picard never knew it was a *Ferengi* vessel, until Daimon Bok
(sp?) told him it was.  So there is no continuity problem there.  The
(then) unidentified ship ambushed the Stargazer, which was abandoned
after the battle.  If you assume the sensor logs were not recovered from
the Stargazer, then no one would have any data on the attacking ship.

|> Picard was
|> supposedly court-martialed for this action, but let go.
|> 

Nope.  The Ferengi faked the Stargazer log to indicate that Picard
fired first.  The fakery was discovered during the episode.  Picard
was not court-martialed.

|> This would seem to be a fairly serious continuity problem. 

Nope.

|> When does the
|> Federation have first contact with the Ferengi? 

Don't know this one.  Sorry.

|> When does Picard? 

In reality, when the Stargazer was attacked.  But HE didn't know that,
until he meets Daimon Bok, who tells him.

|> How did
|> Picard blow up a ship that he didn't even see? 

It showed up on sensors.  I assume he could see it.  But I don't assume 
that the ship-type of Daimon Bok was necessarily the ship-type of his 
son (which Picard distroyed).  So no problem there.

|> And finally, if we just got
|> introduced to this race, how come they are all over the place now? 

Can't help you here.  Anyone?

|> Anybody
|> got any definitive answers?
|> 

I hope this helped some.

-- 
Scott McCoy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: jsv@math.canterbury.ac.nz (Julian Visch)
Subject: Re: A Good Captain
Organization: Department of Mathematics, University of Canterbury
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 02:01:08 GMT

In article <1992Dec20.182107.6768@nmsu.edu>, ssubrama@dante.nmsu.edu (SUBRAMANIAM) writes:
|> >defeated the Romulans in the Klingon episode. 
|> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|> What episode it this?
|> 
Redemption 2