HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Enterprise Crew
From: sgoldstein@eagle.wesleyan.edu
Date: 26 Sep 92 20:30:46 EDT
Organization: Wesleyan University

Ok, I know this may seem like a huge request but here goes:

Would someone be willing to post (or e-mail to me) a complete listing of the
Enterprise crew.  This would include the regular cast as well as other crew
members who have had recuring parts or appeared in a single episode.  This is
something I've hoped to obtain for a while and I hope someone here can help me.
Thanks in advance to anyone who can do this (or atleast contribute some)

Seth

p.s. just saw Time Arrow 2.  What an awesome episode.
From: jgm@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com (John McBride--in my own private Idaho)
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1992 16:35:14 GMT
Subject: Suffering Review Burn-out?
Organization: HP-Boise, ID
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current

Is it just me or did were there an explosion of reviews and reviewers
toward the end of last season?  It seemed like a large percentage of
the basenotes and replies were talking about the reviews.  How about
a Review Basenote, and all the reviews and replies go under that Basenote?  That
way a rasc reader could just bypass one note instead of 6-10 if he/she
does not want to read reviews.

What do you think?  Maybe a new news group would be in order too--
r.a.s.c.reviews.

John McBride
email:  ...hplabs!hpdml99!jgm  or jgm@hpdml99.boi.hp.com
       ----------------
      |                |
     /------------------\
    | Q: Are we not Men? |
   /----------------------\
  |                        |
  --------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: ST: TNG movie ???
From: wildcard@vax1.mankato.msus.edu
Date: 2 Oct 92 11:18:34 -0600
Distribution: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: Mankato State University

In article <1992Sep24.203547.15698@cunews.carleton.ca>, cs304001@scs.carleton.ca (Chulaka Ailapperuma) writes:
> Does anyone think that someone will make a ST:TNG motion picture ?

I have heard that once the series is fineished there are plans for some movies.

Th
From: westergrenbr@bvc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: re:More Time's Arrow II **spoilers**
Date: 1 Oct 92 14:44:48 CDT
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA

In article <1992Sep29.204226.5559@sei.cmu.edu>, ledgerj@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Jim Ledger) writes:
> Spoilers ahead:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Just thought I'd add a few complaints of my own about a few things (among many)
> that bugged me about TAII:
> 
> (1) When the gang first explores the cave under the Presidio, Geordi states
>     that the whole cave was configured to focus triolic (sp?) energy,
>     presumably to facilitate the creation of the time portal. In any case,
>     the cave (and its counterpart on Davidia) are represented as important
>     to the whole time travel bit. However, we see that, for some reason,
>     people entering the portal on Davidia end up on Market St. Why not in
>     the cave under the Presidio? After all, people entering the portal on
>     Earth end up in the cave on Davidia. Did I miss something?
> 
> (2) When the aliens are caught in the hospital, they just wink out to avoid
>     capture. Did they go back to Davidia? If so, it seems they don't need
>     the Presidio cave to move through time. If not, then what happens? Do
>     they become invisible? Do they shift out of phase? If they have this
>     capability, why bother with disguises (how do they manage to appear human
>     anyway?) -- why not just remain invisible/out of phase, until they're
>     ready to snatch somebody?
> 
> 
> I guess my point is that it seems as if the cave under the Presidio doesn't
> really justify itself in the story, except as the final resting place for
> Data's head -- I can't think of any explanation that isn't just hand-waving
> to cover other plot conveniences. 

[stuff deleted]
>
> Jim
>

Well, this may be handwaving, but I had assumed that the aliens 
themselves were capable of focusing triolic(sp?) waves to a certain degree. 
Otherwise, how could they have built the cave in the first place.  The cave 
may just enhance their powers.  When the away team went through the portal 
on Davidia, they were following the aliens and thus the possibilities were 
greater (ie. they could end up on Market Street and not the cave).  
However, when they came back to the 24th century, they went on their own, 
and therefore had to go from the cave on earth to the cave on Davidia.  > 

Or perhaps the aliens just know how to steer.

bmwestergren
if you believe me, i've got some land in florida to sell 'ya.> 

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: kanamori@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Atsushi Kanamori)
Subject: Re: The Inner Light
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 12:53:11 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.050858.3232@schbbs.mot.com> rbruce@robocomp.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Rob Bruce) writes:
>In article <1992Sep27.202143.22012@news.vanderbilt.edu>, MANEJWZA@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu () writes:
>|> In <1992Sep27.060744.14770@news.vanderbilt.edu> MANEJWZA@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu writes:
>
>
>I agree that this was one of the best episodes they have made and 
>very much my favorite! I thought the perfomances of all were perfect
>as well as believable. The story and scripting were also excellent.
>
>Some have mentioned that it seemed to end rather abruptly. I would 
>suggest that it *feels* that way because the story and acting left 
>you wanting even more. I agree that it is too bad we only have an
>hour, but it was sure well spent. I think we will continue to see
>a new side to Jean Luc since his experience. 

What is your evidence for this belief? TNG's record to date (esp.
around BOBW, and "The Mind's Eye") leads me to believe strongly
that this will never come up again.


                       .        
 :....: : .  ::.: .  ..: :    ..     : :    .:   :.:
:::::::.:::::::::::.:::::: :?.:::::..::::.:.:: :.:::: :
-------------------------- -------------------.------ ------------------------
Kanamori's Episode Ratings: (last episode rated: "Time's Arrow Part II")
  "I keep telling you, there *is* no plot." -- Guinan.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Subject: the *big* problem wit
Reply-To: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 28 Sep 92 20:39:42 EST

>Pos. spoilers:


>My biggest problem was: How come they didn't just pay off the landlady
>with more of Data's poker winnings?  This was a crucial plot element
>that ruined the rest of the story. :-) for the humor-impaired.  But I
>have to agree with the overall disappointment from part II after part
>I.

What?  You've GOT to be kidding me!  Paying a rent is more important
than saving the human civilization?!?!?  Come on...


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jason Wong
Calling from Markham, Ontario CANADA.  It's not cold though!  :-)
INTERNET: bernie.wong@canrem.com

 * OLX 2.1 TD * Eat any good books lately?  Q in "Deja Q"
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: markb@spock.dis.cccd.edu (Julie Bixby)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Time's Arrow Part II *SPOILERS*
Date: 29 Sep 92 00:30:31 GMT
Organization: Coast Community College District, Costa Mesa, CA

In article <1992Sep28.175321.14453@gvl.unisys.com> rossi@gvlf9-q.gvl.unisys.com (Pete Rossi) writes:
>In article <69200@hydra.gatech.EDU> cegtitd@prism.gatech.EDU (Tim Dodd) writes:
>>In article <Bv61Er.64z@spock.dis.cccd.edu> markb@spock.dis.cccd.edu (Julie Bixby) writes:
>>>In article <1992Sep21.221539.5342@tin.monsanto.com> lesnyd@monsanto.com (Larry E. Snyder) writes:
>>>>*SPOILERS* for Time's Arrow Part II
>
>>
>>>Yes, and how the Away Team got their 19th Century clothing so fast (did
>>>they jump into a store, by chance?
>>
>>That WAS fast wasn't it?  ...
>
>FAST??   They had all summer to change :-)
>
So if they had all summer, how come Troi was the only one to develop a tan? :-)


-- 
Julie Bixby                        Internet: markb@spock.dis.cccd.edu
Engage Romulan .sig cloaking device....
From: JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: timetravel backwards? - perhaps
Date: 6 Oct 92 12:51:11 GMT
Organization: University at Albany, Albany NY 12222

In article <1992Oct5.210609.15630@unocal.com>
stgprao@st.unocal.COM (Richard Ottolini) writes:
 
>>Another problem with time travel, apart from the causality question, is
>>traffic, yes, traffic.
>>
>>If time travel became a reality in the future, then there would have to
>>be tons of people visiting big moments in history.
>>
>>Example: Tickets to the performance at Ford's theatre the night Lincoln was
>>assassinated would be sold out to travellers from the future --  the hotels
>>in town would be stocked with "out-of-town" people with fake credentials.
>>(Saturday Night Live had a skit that first pointed out this idea to me --
>>they had a bunch of future historians trying to cram into the booth
>>next to Lincoln's, or something like that.)
>
>
How do we know that all of these people we see on the street are not visitors
from the future?  Did you ever stop and ask them?  Try it and see what happens!
 
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jeffrey M. Cohen                      Voice: 518-442-3510
Office for Research (AD 218)          Fax:   518-442-3560
The University at Albany              E-mail: JC924@ALBNYVM1.BITNET
State University of New York
1400 Washington Ave.
Albany, NY 12222
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ramid@nyx.cs.du.edu (Rudy Amid)
Subject: Re: Are you NUTS? (Realm of Fear *SPOILERS*)
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 05:08:19 GMT

bp652@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Gil W. Lau) writes:

>Realm of Fear seemed to miss an episode, so to speak.  Barclay
>asked Geordi if he ever experienced something amiss during 
>transport, and Geordi says he never had.  Boy, I REALLY misunderstood
>"The Next Phase"!  If you don't call THAT a transporter accident....

>(Sorry if someone pointed this out already, but here in tiny
>Blacksburg we get new episodes at the end of the week.  *sigh*)

   Not really.  In "Next Phase" it wasn't the transporter's fault.
Besides, it was Picard et al who blamed the transporter for the mishap.
Geordi knew it wasn't that.  Do you "see" my point?

   Ah.. we're nitpicking.  But hey, that's what r.a.s.c and wasting
bandwith are all about.  :-)

--
!Rudy Amid              ///
a434amid@cdf.toronto.edu//
amid@r-node.gts.org   ///
Netrek/IRC: Radix  \\X//
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: schamber@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca (Sylvain Chamberland)
Subject: Re: Info please on stations carryind DSN
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 17:59:45 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.084810.2376@inland.com> tanski@inland.com writes:
>A time ago, someone posted which networks would be carring "Deep Space
>Nine".  If anyone has that information, would you send it, via email, to
>me?  Thanks in advance.

It would be a good idea to post it again on r.a.s.c...

I lost my unix account in August, and got another one 2 weeks ago, so I
sure have missed a lot of interesting stuff...  :)

>     John Tanski                   ><  "It's a dog eat dog world out   
-- 
Sylvain Chamberland           INTERNET: schamber@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca   
Dept. of Biology          -----------------------------------------------------
University of Waterloo    |  "Biochimiste un jour, biochimiste toujours!"
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada |                               - anonyme
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: Renee@cup.portal.com (Renee Linda Roberts)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: FTP Site: ftp.coe.montana.edu
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 06:31:39 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world

I just logged onto vab02.larc.nasa.gov, and noticed that the STARTREK
archives are now at ftp.coe.montana.edu. Ok, fine. But they limit the number
of anonymous users to 1! I have tried all night long, and there has not been
a time where I could log on.

If the archives are going to be at ftp.coe.montana.edu, then they should
allow more than one person to access them at a time. It isn't very useful if
we can't get to it!

Renee Roberts
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: runyan@cup.hp.com (Mark Runyan)
Subject: Re: Transporter Psychosis
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 20:04:14 GMT
Organization: HP, Cupertino, CA, USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

edward s. chen (edc@evolution.bchs.uh.edu) wrote:
>> linley@netcom.com (Bruce James Robrert Linley) writes:
>>Spoiler alert!
>

>>The thing that got my attention in this episode was O'Brien's comment about
>>transporter psychosis (TP) ; ...
>I also guess they are just retconning Kate Pulaski, and *her* fear of
>transporters.  ...

No, they did not retcon Kate Pulaski and her dislike for the transporter.
The episode clearly detailed that transporter psychosis (TP) was a physical
ailment.  TP is not the *fear* of transporters, it is a transporter
induced physical disfunction.  

Actually, Troi commented that fear of the transporter wasn't rare and that
there were several known cases.  Kate may have been one of those cases
who was desensitized but still uncomfortable with the idea.

Mark Runyan  {r.a.s. random rationalizer}
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: djredick@bluemoon.rn.com (Darrin J. Redick)
Subject: Re: O'Brien's Rank
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[024])
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 92 01:43:44 EDT

v070p6nd@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Anthos) writes:

> 
> O'Brian is and has always been a Chief Petty Officer.  The Lt. reference is f
> 
And O'Brian also stated that he's been transporting over 22 YEARS...

Sounds like an NCO to me...


   ______________________________________________________________________
  |                                                                      |
  | InterNet: djredick@bluemoon.use.com                                  |
  |______________________________________________________________________|
  |                                                                      |
  | FutureNet : #129@#02 #021@#03  #100@#07  #032@#09  #001@#10 #077@#13 |
  |             #041@#14 #067@#15  #131@#16  #043@#19  #113@#21 #126@#22 |
  |             #247@#25 #051@#26  #030@#31  #009@#33  #035@#41          |
  |______________________________________________________________________|
From: reza@magellan.ae.utexas.edu (Alireza Vali)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: O'Brien's Rank
Date: 4 Oct 92 02:51:06 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Center for Space Research Imaging Lab, University of Texas at Austin

In "Ream of Fear" Barclay gave O'brien a DIRECT ORDER.  Wait a second... how
can a Lieutenant Junior Grade give an order to a full Lieutenant???  After
a closer look, O'brien's rank insignia was revealed as a single hollow
pip!!!!  That's even lower than an ensign.  Didn't he used to be a full
Lieutenant?  I'm pretty sure he was referred to as Lt. O'Brien many times
in the past.  What's going on?  Did he get demoted?
-- 
Ali R. Vali - reza@magellan.ae.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: kanamori@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Atsushi Kanamori)
Subject: Re: Lynch's Spoiler Review:  "Time's Arrow, Part II"
Keywords: TNG, Data, head, time-loops
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 02:11:28 GMT

In article <1992Sep27.014958.12595@reed.edu> odlin@reed.edu (Iain Odlin) writes:
>
>  I just remembered one HUGE plot hole that TAII both set up and left hanging
>  while reading Tim's (far kinder than I was -- or felt like being) review:
>  How in Hell did our heros -- and later, Mark Twain -- get into the cave at
>  all, especially given that Data specifically said they'd have great difficul-
>  ty getting to it since it was in the middle of an army camp, or somesuch?
>
>  Just another glaring and awful hole in a glaring and awful episode...  

>I'd almost rather watch "The Cost of Living" 


Let's not go overboard.

. .                .                .        
: : . :. . :  :....: : .  ::.: .  ..: :    ..     : :    .:   :.:
::::::::::.: :::::::.:::::::::::.:::::: :?.:::::..::::.:.:: :.:::?
------------ -------------------------- -------------------.------
Kanamori's Episode Ratings: (last episode rated: "Time's Arrow")
  "This season began with a turkey. I'm simply trying to see 
   that it doesn't end that way." -- fictitious Paramount writer

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: jgasaway@ncsa.uiuc.edu (James Gasaway)
Subject: Worf needs remedial training
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: NCSA
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 18:06:33 GMT

The following contains a MINI-SPOILER for this week's "Troi episode" (I
think it's called Man Of The People).





I don't feel like figuring out the exact
Worf-kicks-butt/Worf-fails-miserably ratio, but doesn't it seem like Worf
continually screws up his security assignments?  This week he's sent down
to the planet with Picard to provide some muscle and he ends up with his
tail between his legs (Didn't he ever watch a western? Always keep your
back to the wall!).  This happens over and over.  Either he's being tossed
around the bridge, being out phasered, or telling an enemy to go ahead and
kill him because he's not afraid.  Heck, this week the transporter chief
(not O'Brien) did a better job of helping Picard than Worf!  Maybe she
should give Worf some tips.


James 
jgasaway@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Univ of Illinois @ Urbana/Champaign
From: honeydew@infopls.chi.il.us (David Cohen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: TA II, SCI FI CHANNEL
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 18:28:57 CDT
Organization: INFOPLUS support, Wheeling, IL


To clear up some confusion, the Sci Fi Channel is a spinoff of the 
now-pluralized USA.  Paramount is part owner with USA.  The commercials 
you now see for SFC are from them, not your cable company, so you should 
call or write to request it, just in case. There will be no conflict with 
the original series, next gen, etc. because Paramount can't show programs 
which are already on regular broadcast stations -- the only Star Trek 
we'll see on SFC is the animated series and the movies.  I'm not quite 
sure how Dr. Who will work out (a handul of PBS station still do have it, 
but since they are non-profit, there shouldn't be a real problem.  (The 
other owner of USA is MCA)

I am becoming increasingly annoyed at grammatical mistakes in STTNG.  In 
TA, I remember Data saying "they are a species WHO ingests human life..." 
or whatever.  It should be "which" or "that."  Such mistakes abound!

As for the new "hook" music, it is barely audible!  That was one of the 
bigger mistakes so far this season: a new title sequence and theme were 
needed instead.
u7hh?mSf&6P]9t^uqK<{_][0Mz6GK:$9]5
{{Wp }um[8=nE>_TPGGl'aXGbhLe@tb0
In regards to Deep Space Nine, the OFC magazine says the starbase was 
built by the Cardassians!  It's not even Federation science.  And the 
Bajorans play a major ro.  Boring boring boring./s

--
honeydew@infopls.chi.il.us (David Cohen)
Infoplus BBS, +1 708 537 0247, v32bis. Home of Infoplus.
From: giordano@andromeda.rutgers.edu (E. Giordano)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: TNG: earlier episodes good? Opinions requested
Date: 7 Oct 92 02:59:01 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.


   I am new to TNG (last 6 months or so) and I
have foudn the shows to be somewhat garbles in that
they emphasis alot of technicalmumbo jumbo as
oppoed to development of chracters like the
original shows--my question is were the earlier
shows espcially the first 2 years of TNG
superior to whats currently running?
From: barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Lynch's Spoiler Review:  "Realm of Fear"
Date: 5 Oct 92 17:01:01 CDT
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

>>|> This happens so much with Geordi that I've come to suspect that they
>>|> are doing it on purpose.  Geordi is always saying "I see." or "See you
>>|> later." or "It looks like..." or else someone is saying these things
>>|> to him.  I know that's just standard usage, so much so that we usually
>>|> don't notice it, but since I noticed it the first few times it seems
>>|> like it happens a lot.

This reminds me of one time when a blind friend of mine got up to make
opening announcements at church and said, "It's good to see everyone
here tonight."  :+)
 
************************************************************************
Jeff Barnes                   "Mike, if my father were alive today, you
Western Kentucky University          know what he'd say?"
BarneJD@WKUVX1.BITNET         "'Help, help, get me out of this coffin'?"
The few, the proud, the LNH!                -SPIDER-MAN 2099 #1
My opinions are not necessarily those of WKU, but they should be!  :+)
************************************************************************
From: 00nderwin@bsu-ucs.uucp
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Question....
Date: 2 Oct 92 15:38:43 GMT

> In TOS, the something seemed to happen to the Dilithium crystals.
> In TNG, however, we seldom hear about them (if at all- I don't remember
> them ever being mentioned). Was there a new engine developed?  Or was
> there a new type of crystal? Or is it simply that the writers got bored
> with it?
> 
> 	Another one: How many times has the saucer separation been used? I only
> remember two: the first one (Encounter at farpoint) and the Season
> finale/premiere with the Borg.  And why do they always separate at High
> Warp ( a supposedly dangerous thing to do?)
>
	As for the dilithium crystals, in the original series, they used real
ones.  The matter/antimatter reaction does deteriorate the crystals a bit, so
they were always needing some.  Same thing still applies in the Next Gen with
one exception:  They replicate the crystals.  No need for dilithium mining
anymore.

	Fleet Admiral Nathan Eriwn