HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hwstock@snll-arpagw.llnl.gov (stockman harlan w)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: 40% Discount of ZyXELs
Date: 13 Oct 92 18:37:41 GMT
Organization: Sandia National Labs, Livermore, CA

>|>geee....ummmm....last I checked, I can't do ANSI graphics on my Mac.  And of
>|>course since I run TeleFinder for my BBS, the fancy graphic was done in a
>|>proper graphics program and appears to the user when he launches the

[...]
>|This may seem surprising, but "ANSI" is not specific to DOS machines; an ANSI 
>|terminal is effectively a VT52, plus some extensions. Many BBS's also send IBM (high ascii) line-

[...]

>	Last time I checked, MS-DOS ANSI was an improperly
>	specified subset of VT-100 terminal codes with
>	several incompatibilities and private extensions.
[...]
>	Many MAC & other terminal emulators do ANSI 3.64
>	and VT-100 reasonably well, but pclone "ANSI" is
>	different enough to warrant a special profile for
>	proper emulation.


This weekend I downloaded the ANSI startup screens from some MAC BBS's;
that horrible non-standard PC clone ANSI was used to produce some pretty
snazzy graphics. Apparently, many Mac owners have adjusted to the
horrible incovenience of having another 128 characters that allow them
to do shading and outlines.

There are currently over 30,000,000 machines running MS-DOS; VT100
terminals, on the other hand, are principally being used as landfill
(that's not fair; some are doing nice work as bird feeders and boat
anchors).

Since the original poster referred to Mac graphics as proper (and
standard, at least in the sense of his preferred BBS and terminal
software) I thought a less provincial approach might be warranted.

You may not like the idea, but history imposes its own standards. Else I
wouldn't be using this incredibly idiotic "vi" editor right now, and we
wouldn't have so many messages written English (which is just about the
most unnecessarily complex language in the world).
From: tmkk@uiuc.edu (Khan)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: WELL
Date: 12 Oct 92 17:24:40 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana


In article <5968.42.uupcb@outlan.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca> terry.walter@outlan.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Terry Walter)  writes:
>
>and a guy a met at an arcade who was using huge computer works to
>impress his friends started to talk about Modems, one area that I am
>quite informed about.  anyways.  he was saying he would rather buy an
>Supra over a USRSportster.  I told him you can enter in an init string
>into a USRSportster to make it a 16.8K dual, his reply was I am waiting
>for the Supra Dual Standard.   Its will have v32bis and v42bis
>protocols.
>
>I told him you can't get a supra to connect to a USR HST, and he said
>these modems you can at high speed.  I really felt like slapping him up
>beside the head.  and he bet me $100 bucks that he can get them to
>connect to a USR HST.

Whatcha gonna do with your $100? ;-)
From: panizo@riogrande.cs.tcu.edu (Maria Panizo)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Hacking USR ROMS [4.2 - 4.1]
Date: 15 Oct 92 02:28:58 GMT
Organization: Texas Christian University

In article <3882@randvax.rand.org> edhall@rand.org (Ed Hall) writes:
>In article <Bw2FJq.n4t@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tmkk@uiuc.edu (Khan) writes:
>>I hack on electronic things I buy all the time. I have a Radio Shaft
>>scanner. When I bought it, it had portions of the 800MHz band locked
>>out. I went in and modified it so that it could receive the full 800MHz
>>band. Others have modified theirs to add more channels, extra bands, and
>>even an interface to allow computer control of the receiver. Is this
>>illegal? Hardly.
>
>Unfortunately, you're wrong.  Modifying your scanner to receive this
>frequency band (used by celular telephones) is a federal crime


I think you're incorrect.  It is illegal to "Listen to" the cellular calls,
but it is not illegal to 

a) modify the scanner    or

b) have the modified scanner in your posession   


any HAMs want to agree?


MP
.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: ujabanco@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (John Abanco)
Subject: Re: Question on Display in Prac. Periph 14400FXSA ext. modem
Organization: Confounded Founders Foundation
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 05:58:32 GMT

I've noticed a slight bug....maybe not a bug, maybe a bug.

But has anyone ever gotten a v32T display? Trellis modulation is ON by
default, and in the months that I've used my modem (I used to have the
1.12c ROMs, now I've got the 1.15m ROMs), I've yet to get a v32T
connection. It always says 'v.32' on any and every 9600 connection.

Would I have to disable v42 or MNP/5 to get the 'T'? Also, has anyone
else have somewhat random quick disconnect problems? Sometimes when I'm
on a BBS I get so far and then bzzzz...NO CARRIER. Not a timeout, not
logging off, in the middle of reading a message. Oh, this is connected
to another PPI14400 with 1.15m ROMs. But I finally get fallback/forward
retrains now!! Once I picked up the phone and got down to 7200 baud...
took about 30 seconds before it retrained to 9600, and another 30 to
retrain to 14.4k. Overall, I'm pleased.

-- 
--My life is such a mess,I end  | INTERNET: ujabanco@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
  up typing.... umop apisdn.    | FIDONET :
        John Abanco             | john.abanco@f769.n115.z1.fidonet.org 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: vision@mindvox.phantom.com (ZiZi Zhao)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: What is the Modem Status?
Keywords: modem, dial in, modem status
Date: 9 Oct 92 19:06:49 GMT
Distribution: u.s.
Organization: [Phantom Access] / the MindVox system

Recently, since I moved in the new house, I cannot dial in
internet, local net, other PC, ... through my PC modem anymore.
Every time, once the "CONNECT 1200/2400" shows on screen, a
half line of picture characters will follow up, and then the
PC will stop there. The rest of all I can do is to disconnect 
and test the modem. 

I checked all data registers of the modem, all are correct.
I tested the response by sending AT H1&T1 and so to the modem,
it always said OK.
But, when I used CHECKIT software to check the serial port
COM1 which is what I am using for modem, it passed all test 
except failed the test of MODEM STATUS. It said
        [int] expected F0h, received F4h.
I put my modem on other PC set, it can work properly.

Is any thing wrong with my modem, it doesn't seem like that to 
me. Is any thing wrong with my I/O board, or telephone line?
I don't know. I hope not. What does that CHECKIT said mean?
        Failed  X  Modem Status


I have called the technical support and foolwed what they suggested
to do. NO USE. My mouse uses COM2, it shouldn't cause any problem.
COM3 is even not defined. I checked all of these jumps, they are
correct. ... So, what is wrong?

Should I take my PC to another house to try figure out if the phone
line in my house is wrong. It doesn't seem realistic to me. Should 
I chang the I/O board to see if the problem is from there ? What 
else can I do? 

I hope some netters are knowledgable about the 
        Failed  X  Modem Status.


ZiZi who regards the netters more than anything else in the world.:)
From: somerist@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Jussi T Someristo)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: How do I find out my Supra ROM level?
Date: 15 Oct 92 23:55:01 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki

franl@centerline.com (Fran Litterio) writes:
: I recently bought a Supra FAX Modem v.32bis.  How can I find out what
: revision of the ROM chips it has?

	By using command ATI3. It reports ROM code revision number.
      My Supra says something like "V1.200-C TR14-Jxxx-001 032"

--
Jussi Someristo
somerist@cc.helsinki.fi
From: brown@odin.ins.cwru.edu (Dan Brown)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Hacking USR ROMS [4.2 - 4.1]
Date: 15 Oct 1992 04:15:35 GMT
Organization: Subversive Student Publications un-inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: odin.ins.cwru.edu

In an earlier posting panizo@riogrande.cs.tcu.edu (Maria Panizo) writes:
>In article <3882@randvax.rand.org> edhall@rand.org (Ed Hall) writes:
>>In article <Bw2FJq.n4t@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tmkk@uiuc.edu (Khan) writes:
>>>I hack on electronic things I buy all the time. I have a Radio Shaft
>>>scanner. When I bought it, it had portions of the 800MHz band locked
>>>out. I went in and modified it so that it could receive the full 800MHz
>>>band. Others have modified theirs to add more channels, extra bands, and
>>>even an interface to allow computer control of the receiver. Is this
>>>illegal? Hardly.
>>
>>Unfortunately, you're wrong.  Modifying your scanner to receive this
>>frequency band (used by celular telephones) is a federal crime
>
>
>I think you're incorrect.  It is illegal to "Listen to" the cellular calls,
>but it is not illegal to 

I believe that it is not illegal to receive the signals, but it is illegal
to use what you hear in any manner. This has been discussed on
comp.dcom.telecom.

>a) modify the scanner    or
>
>b) have the modified scanner in your posession   
>
>
>any HAMs want to agree?
>
>
>MP
>.

-- 
Dan Brown	
brown@ins.cwru.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst)
Subject: Re: SupraFAX Modem Config for Supra BBS ???
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 03:24:00 GMT
Organization: The Programmer's Pit Stop, Ann Arbor MI

In article <1bfnsqINN2pg@skat.usc.edu> mbaffoni@skat.usc.edu (Michael Baffoni) writes:
>the rest of the time.  I ordered my new ROMS (I haven't received them yet - I
>ordered the J (not H) ROMs on Friday (I think the 2nd) - I hope that this 
>was a problem with the BBS, and not with the modem!)

Supra has apparently decided that despite the fact that they had the
orders in electronic format when they were submitted through the BBS,
they are going to print out all the orders and type them into their
order-entry system.  So, they are way behind schedule.  I ordered my
ROMs on 9/25/92 and they shipped 10/8/92.

Supra also seems to be shipping two identical sets of ROMs to
everyone.  I know that I got two sets of ROMs (but was only charged
for one), and a friend of mine also got two sets of ROMs.  I don't
know if this is some sort of screwup in their order processing system,
but this could very well be slowing things down...

-- 
Marc Unangst, N8VRH         | "There are two ways to solve this problem:
mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us   | the hard way, and the easy way.  Let's start
                            | with the hard way."
                            |   - W. Scheider, from a Physics lecture
From: mir@chorus.chorus.fr (Adam Mirowski)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Supra New ROM (ordering info)
Date: 12 Oct 92 16:25:36 GMT
Organization: Chorus systemes, St Quentin en Yvelines, France
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

rsnyder@atl.ge.com (Bob Snyder) writes:
: 
: From what I gather, Rockwell promised MNP10 (and possibly V23) would be
: implimented in their chipset back when Supra was getting geared up to make the
: modem, and didn't deliver, leaving Supra with all the modem cases, boxes, and
: promo material that said "MNP10" on it. Supra said it will be available in the
: future, but that there may not be room on the chip for MNP10 and all the other
: features, so the MNP10 chips may not have all the features the other chips
: have.
: 

V23 isn't maybe implemented.... but it certainly DOES work in Supra
modems. I know several people which have one and use it to connect
with other V23 modems.
-- 
Adam Mirowski,  mir@chorus.fr (FRANCE),  tel. +33 (1) 30-64-82-00 or 74
Chorus systemes, 6, av.Gustave Eiffel, 78182 Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines CEDEX
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: wolfgang@netcom.com (Wolfgang Henke)
Subject: Re: flow control on serial connection
Organization: Netcom
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 23:26:32 GMT

Phil Howard (pdh@netcom.com) wrote:
: What methods to the variable speed modems really use for controlling
: the excess flow on the serial connection?  I frequently hear about
: horror stories where some such modem is using ^S and ^Q for flow
: control.
: 
: I want to make sure I buy a modem that uses CTS or appropriate RS-232
: lines for the control, and full 256 code transparency to the other end.
: 
: Any models to avoid?
: Any models that you know for sure are fully transparent?
: 
: BTW, where is the FAQ hiding (or is there one)?

^S and ^Q are used for 'software flow control'. Most high speed modems
also support 'hardware flow control' perusing CTS/RTS RS232 signals.

I know of no FAQ for this group, but some files available by anonymous
ftp from ftp.rahul.net /pub/wolfgang might be interesting:

MDMPRIMR.ZIP    general introduction to modems
V42TEXT.ZIP     error correction and compression explanations
SCOUT.ZIP       specs, tests, info about the Digicom Scout Plus modems
SCOUT           brief info and pricing for Digicom Scout Plus modems

There are other modem related files available and more are added from
time to time.


-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
   Wolfgang Henke        wolfgang@henke.sf-bay.org       wolfgang@netcom.com

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: shweeja02@cc.curtin.edu.au (James Hwee)
Subject: Help, VT-320 for Telix3.12
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 08:41:09 GMT

Hi there,

I hope this is the right group and I doubly hope that this isn't a FAQ
but...

I'm using Telix 3.12 and I need help with a keyboard definition file
that emulates a VT-320 terminal (or similar).

The PgUp/PgDn keys are the main concern as I need scrub the old 
UPLOAD/DOWNLOAD values and replace them with the "original"  
ScreenUp/ScreenDown keys.

Emailing me the UUencoded keydefs file would be perfect!
Any help would be *very* much appreciated.


Thanks in advance,
James

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
   James Hwee                   Internet : SHWEEJA02@cc.curtin.edu.au
   Curtin University
   Perth, Western Australia
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: john@cutler.com (John E. Babbitt Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Intel 14.4
Date: 7 Oct 92 15:43:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: cutler.1992Oct7.084321.300
Organization: Cutler & Company, Inc., Medford OR (503) 770-9000

In article <1992Oct7.081410.20445@seq.uncwil.edu>, herbst@seq.uncwil.edu (R.T. Herbst) writes:
> Anyone have any experience with Intel's 14.4 external modem.
> Might buy one. Would appreciate comments.
> herbst@seq.uncwil.edu

This was just discussed a few weeks ago.  To summarize, many of us own
more than one unit, and we're quite happy with it.

Regards,

John E. Babbitt, Jr.        {UUCP: ...hplabs!hp-pcd!orstcs!cutler!john}
Senior Programmer/Analyst   {Internet: john@cutler.com}
Cutler & Company, Inc.      {Phone: 503/770-9000 (voice) 503/770-9014 (tt)}
Medford, Oregon  97504      {Disclaimer: What I say is my personal opinion}
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: isc10192@nusunix1.nus.sg (KOH KHANG WEE)
Subject: Mail order 14.4 !
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 07:01:19 GMT

 Hello

I need a source for mail order 14.4 Externals Faxmodem (I think the new
Supra Faxmodem is quite ok !) Please Email me ASAP ! I live in South
East Asia, so I hope to be able to fax order to the source. Thanks in
advance !!!

regards

Jerry Koh
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples)
Subject: Re: MNP5 with WorldBlazer
Organization: Private system -- Orlando, FL
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 18:55:34 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.174036.2525@europa.asd.contel.com> pascoe@rocky.gte.com (Dave Pascoe) writes:
>You have to set S111=0 (I had S111=255) which disables protocol
>support. Then MNP negotiation will work.

That's pretty strange -- how are you supposed to get spoofing over
V.32/V.32bis, which requires MNP?
-- 
John W. Temples -- Preferred:  john@jwt.UUCP    (jwt!john@peora.sdc.ccur.com)
                -- Alternate:  john@jwt.oau.org
From: laut@alien.gici.com (Bill Laut)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Need a FAQ on v.32bis/v.42bis diff.
Date: 9 Oct 92 20:27:39 GMT
Organization: Gull Island Consultants, Inc.



	Is there a FAQ somebody could please e-mail me on the differences
between v.32bis and v.42bis.  Especially, covering the following:

	1)  Maximum data (vs. DTE) rates for both
	2)  Maximum DTE rates
	3)  Compression algorithms
	4)  realistic throughput rates (sustained and bursts)

	thanks!

-- 
Bill Laut			Internet:  laut@alien.gici.com
Gull Island Consultants, Inc.	Phone:     (616) 780-3321
P.O. Box 627
Muskegon, MI  49440		>> "Usual disclaimers, apply within" <<
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: Practical Peripherals 14400
Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745 
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 20:00:21 GMT

bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser) writes:

>larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>>I am realling considering the SupraFAX v.32bis modems..  I picked up one
>>of the new USR v.32bis/FAX modems and was shocked that it only supported
>>fax class 1 and not the latest, fax class 2.  It does of course offer the

>What are you using for software to access the FAX on UNIX?  Is there something
>which will receive the fax, then display it somehow in an xwindow appliction?

DigiFax for one, and the public domain FAX software (I forget the name)
has been reported to work with some external fax modems 

Most of it runs outside of X -- at least the stuff I've seen 


-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: broberts@waggen.twuug.com (Bill Roberts)
Subject: Re: PM1440FXSA ROM upgrade
Keywords: Practical Peripherals, V32.bis, ROM, upgrade
Organization: Brite Systems
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 00:46:18 GMT

birchall@pilot.njin.net (Shag) writes:

>wjones@halcyon.com (Warren Jones) writes:

>>There has been some discussion in this group of a ROM upgrade
>>for the PM14400FXSA.  Can anyone fill me in on what bugs the
>>upgrade is intended to fix and/or what new features it supports ?

>The upgrade gets rid of all the nasty problems with retrains, and in the case
>of my modem [which previously had rom v1.11h] enabled it to maintain 14.4
>connects for more than 30 seconds.  I think there may have been a problem with
>connecting using v.42/LAPM which also now works fine, but I'm not sure.

In addition it fixed a bad bug in the "inactivity timer" that locked the
modem in the "off-hook" state that could only be reset with a "power off",
the feature works great now but NOT as documented the S30 register is in
"minutes" rather that "10s of seconds".  I have my "unix box" modems set with
an auto-hang up at "5 min" on my "news/mail" lines.  Keeps the lines turned
over and free for other users.
-- 
|  Bill Roberts, Va Beach VA   |  In the field of observation, chance  |
|  broberts@waggen.twuug.com   |  favors the prepared mind. - Pasteur  |
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Distribution: jadpc2
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 12:20:35 -0800
From: Zero_One@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Subject: ZyXEL 16800bps?
Comment-To: The_Mad_Hatter@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Reply-To: Zero_One@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
X-FSC-PATH: 202/701
X-FSC-EID: 10ca 2bdbaf43
X-FSC-PID:  FM+ 2.1

 > I have a ZyXEL U1496E with version 5.02 EPROMs.
 > I tried connecting to a USR Dual Standard with AT&N35, but
 > could only get a 14400bps connection.
 > Does anyone know how I can connect at 16800bps?
 > Thanks.

At this time, you can only get a 16.8k connect with another ZyXEL with
rom verion M5.01 or higher.

Tyrone Horton
(Zero One)
Tech Support
ZyXEL USA

---
 * Origin: -=ZyXEL USA=- 1:202/701.101 (1:103/356.6)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: Camz@debug.cuc.ab.ca
Subject: USR ROMs, more/new information
Reply-To: Camz@wooga.cuc.ab.ca (Martin Zimmerman)
Organization: The Magic BBS (Debug Computer Services)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 23:55:26 GMT
Keywords: 
 
 

I've got one of the large footprint USR DS modems.  With all the talk that
has been flying around about the sportsters and how to make them work like
the DSs, I got curious, and tried the commands on my DS.  The command:
 
ATGW0000,00 produced an error but some tinkering soon showed that the ATG
command did indeed do something albeit undocumented.
 
ATG=XXXX:YYYY
 
Will dump a block of 256 bytes from the USR modem's internal memory.  The
modem uses an 80188 processor, so the XXXX is a real-mode selector, and
the YYYY is the offset.  Additional tinkering showed that 0000:0000-7FFF
was the 32K RAM in my DS, and F000:0000-FFFF was the ROM.
 
I have tried this out on a friend's sportster and it produces the same
results.
 
Since then I have dumped then entire rom to a binary file and am in the
process of disassembling the code.  So far about 50% done the disassembly,
I have to get a reference on what is different between the 80188 and the
rest of the 80x86 processors since my unasembler program was a bit
confused for a few of the opcodes.
 
I'm interested in sharing my results with interested folks, but am still
debating and curious as the the legal implecations of posting a
disassembly of the USR firmware to a public forum such as this :-)
 
Camz.
From: bruce@camb.com (Barton F. Bruce)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: ZyXEL 16800bps?
Date: 13 Oct 92 21:42:38 EDT
Organization: Cambridge Computer Associates, Inc.

In article <1992Oct10.123516.7471@iscsvax.uni.edu>, eadie5295@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:
> 
>   I am interested in getting the U-1496B internal modem with 40% discount.
> Is there ANY way of getting one that comes with the new ROM sockets, so I can
> get 16.8k without paying the extra 50 bucks?

Unless you absolutely MUST stuff it inside some PC, buy either of the 
*better* models - the external ones. The PC card simply isn't what the 
others are.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: rdippold@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Subject: Re: 40% Discount of ZyXELs
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 02:43:28 GMT

bkwg0457@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Brent Whitlock) writes:
>I finally gave in and called, and the file did not exist!  I wasted over
>20 minutes of long distance time looking for it.  I left a note to the

It exists.  I called and downloaded it.  It was also posted to
comp.dcom.modems. 
-- 
Only a mediocre person is always at his best.
From: hurtubis@a.chem.upenn.edu (Vincent Hurtubise)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Opinions on the CXR/Anderson-Jacobson 9632-STH ?
Date: 12 Oct 92 15:29:36 GMT
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


   I might be able to purchase a used (2 year old) external
CXR/Anderson-Jacobson 9632-STH modem and would like opinions on its strengths
and weaknesses.
I understand this is a 9600 (v32) modem with MNP5.  Are there any other
features ?  How well does it support fallback and fallforward ?  How good
is it with noisy lines ?
How compatible is it with other v32 and slower modems ?
How hard is it to get it serviced ?
  Thanks in advance.
     Vince
----------------------------------
   Vincent Hurtubise
      hurtubis@a.chem.upenn.edu
      hurtubis@sun0.chem.upenn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: b073766@hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk (Great Era)
Subject: Modem programming
Organization: The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 10:18:48 GMT


I am trying to write some programs to drive my modem directly.
Is there any source out there such as document or books can
help me to write these program? If you know the source or index,
please send me a e-mail. Thanks.

Great Era.