HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 21:39:15 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?)) writes:

> define terms, let's not just toss them around!  
> thanks dan
> 
> peg
> 

Time to start adding glossary blocks to our posts I guess..... :)

PC gets defined in many different ways it seems. Since I am unable
to locate an official definition for the term - we'll use mine..

I consider being 'politically correct' the act of automatically
agreeing with anything that a visible group states is 'the thing'
to be saying, thinking, doing.. etc. Kind of like brown-nosing....

The thing that makes PC an undesirable thing is it makes it easy
for lobby groups or 'power platforms' to manipulate people as a
group. 

No thinking, no judgment process, no investigation.. "they said
it so it must be right and true.."

Ever see 'the boss' talk about something and then watch all of 
the little yes-men start nodding their heads and saying "oh yes!
that is brilliant!!" or just generally verbally groveling for
attention? - Same basic thing.. 

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: cplma@groper.jcu.edu.au (Lynn Alford)
Subject: Re: His friend and nobody else's, Kevin Darcy!
Organization: James Cook University
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 01:05:41 GMT

In <1992Apr2.032758.8150@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:

>In article <H.9KkGgT4jET2@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
>>In <1992Mar29.055700.26223@rotag.mi.org>, Kevin Darcy writes:
>>>
>>>I did not "inflict" [sic] that thread on news.admin. Keegan did. Both of my 

>>    And incidendently, why the (sic) after inflict? This, if I remember 
>>an old Clay Bond posting correctly, is meant to denote that there is 
>>some doubt that the word has been used or spelled correctly. 

>Clay Bondage is full of shit, as usual. "Sic" serves the _general_ purpose of
>highlighting a word, or sometimes a whole phrase, as being LITERALLY QUOTED.

Half right and half wrong.  Batting about normal, I'd say.

The correct use of the sic is to indicate a phrase is being literally
quoted.  This much is correct.  But the usage of it is normally (i.e., by
literate people and not KD) limited to times when, in the opinion of the
person doing the quoting, there is something questionable in the quote.
I have frequently seen it used to indicate a mispelling, or a misplaced
word or phrase in a literal quote.  It is not used to highlight a word
or phrase.

>It therefore has many uses; not just the one Clayhead ascribes to it. It CAN
>be used to highlight the fact that the original was misspelled (in case there
>is a doubt as to whether the person quoting made a transcription error). But,
>it can also be used to, for example, clarify the meaning of double quotes.

Not in any writing guide that I have read.  Nor does my Britannica
dictionary agree with you.  Do you have any sources for this
information?

Lynn

T.S.A.K.C.
-- 
The screen of my Mac doesn't really resemble my desktop despite being designed 
to support the desktop metaphor (1), and the windows on my terminal bear only 
the slightest relation to the contraptions that lets drafts into my office.  
Stroustrup.  1) I wouldn't be able to tolerate such a mess on my screen anyway.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6908 alt.politics.homosexuality:2218
From: eric@wdl1.wdl.loral.com (Eric Scott Kuhnen)
Subject: Re: HOLOCAUST MYTHS
Keywords: nazi trash
Organization: Loral Western Development Labs
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 17:13:40 GMT

kmcvay@oneb.wimsey.bc.ca (Ken Mcvay) writes:
>In article <XL4BJB1w164w@b-cpu.UUCP> pfaust@b-cpu.UUCP (Pete Faust) once
>again demonstrates his regressive genetic complexion:
>>     Well, Zionist pressure is again stirring to deny
>>Banished CPU access.  With the Usenet exception, the Mass
>I've got news for you, you disgusting piece of shit - I'd be delighted
>if you lost your feed, although I haven't done anything towards that
>end, and I'm not remotely either Jewish or a Zionist. You are simply a
>cowardly lump of dung the net could do without. Even us non-Zionists
>can figure that out, just by reading your trash.

Not exactly the Queen's English, is it?  Why is it necessary to use
"disgusting piece of shit" and "cowardly lump of dung" to attack a
position that is clearly in opposition to your own?  In addition to
being a bit redundant, you do nothing to improve your own case or
sway public opinion with drivel driven by blind rage.


>>     Side remark:  Holocausters continue quoting from books
>>and other material, full of lies and misleading, deceiving
>>material.  A mass media debate or, better still, a series of
>>mass media debates by the most knowledgeable, on both sides,
>>would expose their lies and deception.  This obviously is why
>>there is no debate, at any cost.
>There is no debate, dog shit, because you and your nazi trash friends
>have nothing, absolutely nothing, to say. Not even a glimmer of
>substance - none, nada, nothing. Giving air time to shit like you
>would serve no ends but yours, and the folks who control the media
>(that's US, asshole - we're the PUBLIC) aren't about to provide you
>with a recruiting platform - we haven't forgotten what your kind did
>to the world, and we never will.

A debate would force both sides to prove that their accusations against
the other were true.  I fear that considered on its own merits, such a
debate would end in a draw, and that is *exactly* the position the
anti-Holocaust faction would hope for.  As it stands now, public opinion
and a preponderance of the evidence support the assertions of the
Holocausters.  No other discussion is necessary.

"Dogs may bark, but the parade rolls on."  Let it be so.

"Q"
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My opinions are based upon Reason and Logic, and are therefore not connected
in any way to my employer.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6596 alt.politics.homosexuality:2011
From: dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: slang
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 11:26:34 GMT
Reply-To: munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac
FollowUp-To: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Keywords: 
Organization: More like Dis~, really.

In article <1992Apr11.153910.11282@amhux2.amherst.edu>, Tim Pierce writes:

> In article <jco7l1o@fido.asd.sgi.com> dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
> 
> >As a point of amusement, does anyone out there know what the slang
> >word "punk" means?  How about you, Jack (punk@bogus.com).  
> >
> >I'll tell you, because this is rather funny....
> >
> >Punk is a slang term, in the african american community, which means
> >the same thing as "faggot"...
> 
> Or "a young boy kept by an older homosexual man."  I particularly
> liked that definition during the most recent NAMBLA thread.

Punk also has a definition of 'dried decayed wood or other
substance that smolders when ignited'

A terrific descriptive term for the flamed out punk fag bashers
out there!

Dac
--
munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac      David Andrew Clayton.           // _| _  _
  prolix!dac%eyrie@labtam.oz.au      Canberra, Australia           \X/ (_](_](_
        dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au      I post .
prolix!dac@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au            . . I am.             +61 6 290 2215
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6953 rec.music.misc:14452 alt.stupidity:1594 alt.exploding.kibo:193 alt.religion.kibology:1680
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,rec.music.misc,alt.stupidity,alt.exploding.kibo,alt.religion.kibology
Subject: Re: a slight problem....la, la, la...
Date: 16 Apr 92 15:50:01 GMT
Organization: Univ. of Wisconsin - Madison
Originator: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu

In article <kuq9klINNlhs@sal-sun109.usc.edu> royander@sal-sun109.usc.edu (Roy Anderson) writes:
>
>In article <1992Apr14.153330.438@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>, bur@ultisol.gsfc.nasa.gov (Mike Bur) writes:
>|> cease@carina.unm.edu (Cecilia De Blasi) writes:
>|> >davros@vesta.unm.edu (DAVROS) writes:
>|> >>jxj5824@hertz.njit.edu (JJ) writes:
>|> >>>klein@kira.egr.msu.edu (Jeffrey Klein) writes:
>|> >>>>bur@ultisol.gsfc.nasa.gov (Mike Bur) writes:
>|> >>>>>dkelly@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (Rocky Horror) writes:
>|> [MIA]
>|> >>>>>>>>>>>>Elvis is outside. 
>|> >>>>>>>>>>>Elvis is my guide.
>|> >>>>>>>>>>Elvis has five brides.
>|> >>>>>>>>>Elvis can't hide.
>|> >>>>>>>>Elvis can slide.
>|> >>>>>>>Elvis can glide.
>|> >>>>>>Elvis is old, dead, and dried.
>|> >>>>>Elvis likes to fold red hide.
>|> >>>>Elvis liked the old red light district.
>|> >>>Elvis bites his mom and dies.
>|> >>Elvis saw me so I am alive.
>|> >Elvis taught me how to jive.
>|> Elvis bought a can of Spam.
>Elvis said 'Therefore I am!'
Elvis was bigger than the Hoover Dam.
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
From: ladage@pnet07.cts.com (Kenneth David Ladage)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: J.F.K,ELVIS, AND STUPID AMERICANS
Date: 10 Apr 92 05:05:18 GMT
Organization: People-Net [pnet07], San Diego, CA

clg308@vaxa.strath.ac.uk writes:
>Having just started using the news service i was suprised a the amount of space
>devoted to J.F.K.Afterall,what was he but another in the line of american
>presidents who had very low morals.I personally don't really care who killed
>him, all I know is that he done the world a favour.He was nothing but a bed
>hopping,randy,corrupt prick.
>The way you treat this guy you would think he was god,instead of a randy
>catholic.
>The way you treat him is typical of you stupid americans,for instance the way
>you have made Elvis into some sort of an idol,when all he was,was a below
>average singer with a drug habbit.This man should not be idolised but condemed.
>
>Singed Andy(An American Hater)


        It would seem that you are by far the most un-educated person to have
signed on in a while.

        It would seem I am to have the pleasure of placing you into the proper
mode of thought.

        Was Kennedy a Saint?  No.  Nor do we, the ones who love him, believe
him to be, or even claim that he was.  We know that he was dis-honest.  He was
a _POLITICIAN_ for Christ's Sake!
        Was KEnnedy charismatic?  A leader?  A good President?  Yes, Yes and
yes.  Simple enough?  He was killed.  We do not know the full story due to a
cover up and we want, no..._NEED_ to know by whom (all of them), why (all of
the reasons) and to what end.

        Was Elvis a Saint?  No.  Nor do we, the ones who love him believe him
to be, or even claim that he was.  We know that he was a racist, over-eating,
drug addict.  But he sang wonderful music.  He _ENTERTAINED_ us.  That was
enough.  That was his job.

        Are _YOU_ a Saint?  You must be.  For you have cast the first stone.

        How sad it must be, to be so dis-illusioned...

                                                Until Wisdom Prevails,

                                                - Kenneth David Ladage


UUCP: {nosc crash ncr-sd}!pnet07!ladage
ARPA: baron!pnet07!ladage@nosc.mil
INET: ladage@pnet07.cts.com
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6770 alt.politics.homosexuality:2115
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 14 Apr 92 16:02:27 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <w80ViB3w164w@Bogus.COM>, punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
> 
> If the homosexual contact were really natural, it would produce offspring.  
> Sex is after all the act of reproduction.

Well, you've just proven how little you know about sex.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Pseudonyms & cowardice
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:34:13 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <22600@goofy.Apple.COM> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:

>In article <gi1BiB5w164w@Bogus.COM>, punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:

>> Homophobic?  HaaHaa!!!  You ARE amusing.  I just don't like HOMO's.

>"Racist?  HaaHaa!!!  You ARE amusing.  I just don't like blacks."
 [...]

Don't bother trying, Lefty. Spelling the truth out to a homohater is
like trying to get an orangutan to compose a sonnet. He'd rather eat
his banana.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6997 alt.stupidity:1611 alt.religion.kibology:1688
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.stupidity,alt.religion.kibology
Subject: Re: a slight problem....la, la, la...
Date: 16 Apr 92 20:43:40 GMT
Article-I.D.: doug.1992Apr16.154340.24666
Organization: Univ. of Wisconsin - Madison
Originator: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu

In article <0#1jtt-@lynx.unm.edu> davros@leo.unm.edu (DAVROS) writes:
>In article <92107.114322ALY101@psuvm.psu.edu>, ALY101@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>> In article <1992Apr16.114815.14202@schaefer.math.wisc.edu>,
>> mckinzie@schaefer.math.wisc.edu (Mark McKinzie) says:
>> >
>> >royander@sal-sun109.usc.edu (Roy Anderson) writes:
>> >
>> >
>> >>In article <1992Apr14.153330.438@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>,
>> >bur@ultisol.gsfc.nasa.gov (Mike Bur) writes:
>> >>|> cease@carina.unm.edu (Cecilia De Blasi) writes:
>> >>|> >davros@vesta.unm.edu (DAVROS) writes:
>> >>|> >>jxj5824@hertz.njit.edu (JJ) writes:
>> >>|> >>>klein@kira.egr.msu.edu (Jeffrey Klein) writes:
>> >>|> >>>>bur@ultisol.gsfc.nasa.gov (Mike Bur) writes:
>> >>|> >>>>>dkelly@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (Rocky Horror) writes:
>> >>|> [MIA]
>> >>|> >>>>>>>>>>>>Elvis is outside.
>> >>|> >>>>>>>>>>>Elvis is my guide.
>> >>|> >>>>>>>>>>Elvis has five brides.
>> >>|> >>>>>>>>>Elvis can't hide.
>> >>|> >>>>>>>>Elvis can slide.
>> >>|> >>>>>>>Elvis can glide.
>> >>|> >>>>>>Elvis is old, dead, and dried.
>> >>|> >>>>>Elvis likes to fold red hide.
>> >>|> >>>>Elvis liked the old red light district.
>> >>|> >>>Elvis bites his mom and dies.
>> >>|> >>Elvis saw me so I am alive.
>> >>|> >Elvis taught me how to jive.
>> >>|> Elvis bought a can of Spam.
>> >>Elvis said 'Therefore I am!'
>> >Elvis died whilst in the can!
>> Elvis eats my white toe jam.
>> >Elvis was a big fat man!
Elvis liked to read the Koran.
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
From: karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Another Spectacularly Accurate Prediction (NOT!)
Date: 9 Apr 92 16:23:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr9.102350.736

In article <4071@ucsbcsl.ucsb.edu>  writes:
 
> >Nope.  I was off for the past week due to our Spring Break
> >fiasco, but I am back.  
 
> I have no doubt but that for you, it was a fiasco.

You don't have a clue, Skinnydick, my "fiasco" reference had to do 
with the time we had break this year, and not whether or not my 
specific activities during break amounted to disaster.  The only 
fiasco we have here is your constant, senseless blathering.

> I, for one, am glad to have a stationary target here in a.f.  
> Thanks for providing one.
  
What's the use of having a stationary target if you're too damn
stupid to hit it?

> Sure you and Kibble arn't in luv, Wetwick?

Yeah, I'm sure.  I like to stick to members of the opposite sex.


Karsten Hendrick
karsten@nic.gac.edu
karsten@lavatch.gac.edu
From: djk@homophobes.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Accusations of Heterophobia (WAS Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts...)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 92 01:05:21 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) writes:

> Oh, I see, it's ok to label heterosexuals as homophobes (even without
> justification) but not to label homosexuals as heterophobes?
> 
> Karsten Hendrick
> karsten@nic.gac.edu
> karsten@lavatch.gac.edu
>  


Karsten, you should know by now that they make up their own rules
as they go.. 

End up changing them a lot too! - Just consider the source.


-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@homophobes.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!homophobes!Djk ------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6619 alt.politics.homosexuality:2028 alt.sex:14247
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 03:53:46 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

sbl2@ellis.uchicago.edu (S.B. Lawsky) writes:

> _homophobe_: n, a person who fears or hates homosexuals and
> homosexuality.
> 
> _homophobia_: n, unreasoning fear of or antipathy towards homosexuals
> and homosexuality
> 
>   

Lots of words in there that are trash in nature. Some carry the
word 'fuck' too. 'Faggot' is also in there. :-)


-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7100 alt.politics.homosexuality:2365 alt.sex:14991
From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 17 Apr 92 16:52:13 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <8m7DJB1w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

>Repeal sodomy laws? - Make them more STRINGENT! 

Fascist.

What a repertoire. Homohater-misogynist-racist-fascist.

My, you must have loads o' friends.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts TO Justify "Queer Nation"
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 14:50:41 GMT

In article <gN8uiB4w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

>My objection if this ridiculous classification of anyone who
>does not agree with gay/les/NAMBLA/etc issues and is 'nuts'
>enough to air his views as somehow 'sick' or a 'nazi'..

Such is not the case.  Those who raise the hue and cry for queer
people to be locked up, put away, killed, etc. because of some
paranoid views on homosexuality are described as "sick," "Naziesque,
"Fascist," etc.  Those who disagree with queer issues -- which are NOT
identical to NAMBLA issues, thanks very much -- but are willing to
actually _discuss_ their objections (interesting concept ... you ought
to try it sometime) receive rational conversation in return.  Go to
alt.politics.homosexuality.  Talk to Smitty at PSU, or Alberto Pinkas
at UMD, and see for yourself.

>I am
>neither and the majority who feels as I do are also not to 
>be compared with those 'horrid examples' (thanks for the term
>Artimus!).

Thanks to Artimus?  You're doing wonders for your credibility, let me
tell you.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Someone here suggested blue square badges for
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  straights.  Maybe we should try mauve
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  heptagons?" - Damian Cugley, on soc.bi
From: trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: `k e v i n' crumbles
Date: 9 Apr 92 12:26:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: crud.29e38c4b.crud
Organization: Stuck with a PC-clone (St. Paul, Minnesota, USA)

In article <22436@goofy.Apple.COM>
        lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:

]Then, in article <1992Mar28.175644.22036@rotag.mi.org>, kevin@rotag.mi.org
](Kevin Darcy) writes:
]> 
]> In article <29083@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> keegan@oboe.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan
]Jr) writes:
]> >
]> >non sequitor. 
]> 
]> Mispelled...
]
]Ah, I see you're back to spelling flames again, Kevin.  And, by the way, those
]were _terribly_ impressive ones.

Are you quoting Kebbin absolutely verbatim?  If so, I'm impressed.

]I'm sure folks will think twice before taking on a man who can spell "prima
]facie" _and_ "non sequitur".  Not to _mention_ "servitus tigni immitendi"! 

Kevin's grasp of dead language is impressive.


--
Barry Schwartz        trashman@crud.mn.org
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6929 alt.politics.homosexuality:2237
From: pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?))
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 16 Apr 92 05:29:34 GMT
Reply-To: pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <1992Apr10.215733.5163@polari.com> elf@polari.com writes:
>In article <RicwiB1w164w@Bogus.COM>
>     punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>
>>twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
>  {suggests that he thought sesame st's bert and ernie are gay}

>>Oh, Bah, did you see Bert and Ernie FUCKING once?  Did they do anything
>>that was suggestive??
>
>   Get a clue, Jack... lots of gay couples don't fuck.  _I_ thought
>Ernie and Bert were lovers when I watched the show 17 years ago, and
>I'm not even gay.

my ex-husband (also not gay) said that the first time he saw
the show.  we both thought it was positive.  

>>It would be a better assumption that they are probably brothers...
>
>   Oh, sure... with genetics like that?  One short and round, one tall
>and shaped like Belthzaar ("We are from France!").  Ernie's darker
>coloring suggested they were different races, even.  Sorry, at twelve I
>though Ernie and Bert were cool and queer.

more to the point, they *say* they're not brothers.  bert has a 
twin brother named brad, whom we see ernie meet for the first 
time.  and ernie babysits his niece, whom bert has never met, 
several times.  
(i'm a sesame st. junkie going through withdrawal now that all 
my kids are in school and think they are too cool to watch the
show!  ack!)

>>Nope, you don't see it, I am merely undoing the damage you have done.
>>You have no sense of family values do you?  Of course not.
>
>   I have a wonderful sense of family values.  You just don't respect
>them.

in this country nowadays, there are a *lot* of different kinds
of families, race, creed, sexual orientation.  i disagree with 
lots of peoples values and beliefs.  but i don't expect them to
hide them from my kids to make *my* life easier, to prevent 
them from getting bad ideas that i don't like.  i have enough 
confidence in my values, and in their ability to think, to trust 
them to do just that... think.  

after all, they have born-again evangelical fundamentalist 
christian relations!  they *have* to know how to think.  
;)

peg
From: karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Where Karsten Likes To Do It
Date: 16 Apr 92 19:49:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr16.134904.993

In article <84024@bu.edu>  writes:
 
> KH:
> >>>I don't play football, I play rugby
 
> BK:
> >> Same butt-patting, different country.

> KH:
> >Wrong, no butt-patting in rugby

> Yeah, right.

Maybe when you play, I was just speaking from personal experience.

Karsten Hendrick
karsten@nic.gac.edu
karsten@lavatch.gac.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Subject: Re: Declaration of War on PSU
Reply-To: bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Organization: PENN$YLVANIA $TATE UNIVER$ITY
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 17:51:42 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.153547.10739@sunhillo.uucp>, olias@sunhillo.uucp (Mitch Gorman) writes:
|> In article <1992Apr15.130051.1347@wkuvx1.bitnet> kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos) babbles:
|> >In article <sq2wH7=wq6@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
|> >> 
|> >> Show me one post of mine where I typed "OGGLE."  You appear to be lying.
|> 
|> 	Now shut the fuck up and die.

Request denied.  Bruce is not ready to die.  You are obviously misinformed.
Perhaps you need a dose of OGGLE.  I'm sure K e n will give it to you.  Since
you have not answered my request of showing me a post of mine with "OGGLE,"
perhaps you are the one who needs to shut the fuck up and die.  Enough said.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6226 alt.politics.homosexuality:1734