HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: samsung!ulowell!cpsacs.cps.msu.edu!jaya@uunet.UU.NET (Jayashree Ramanathan)
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: Multiprocessors {Request for references]
Date: 15 Apr 92 12:14:15 GMT
Distribution: fj

I am interested in obtaining papers/reports on the most recently
introduced multiprocessors (shared-memory, distributed-memory, small-scale,
large-scale). Please respond by e-mail and I will summarize if there
is sufficient interest.

Regards,
Jayashree
--
Jayashree Ramanathan		 		| jaya@cpsacs.cps.msu.edu
Grad Asst., Dept. of Computer Science	 	| jaya@msuegr.BITNET
Michigan State University, East Lansing MI48824	| uunet!frith!jaya
From: AGUI@MDRVM3.VNET.IBM.COM
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: Re: Physical Computers with certain Architectures
Date: 6 Apr 92 23:05:40 GMT
Distribution: fj

Commenting about the least popular of the architectures you
mention, I have been using for the last year a Telmat/32, in a
Perfect-Shuffle arrangement.

The Telmat/32 is a 32 T-800 machine based on the Supernode Architecture
coming out of a ESPRITE project funded by the EEC. Being reconfigurable
a whole collection of diferent architectures can be implemented,
such as grids, 3Dcubes (also cycle-connected), shuffles, rings, etc... .

This Perfect Shuffle arrangement, which I later found to be
the DeBruijn network, is found to be very powerful, for distributed
fft computation, matrix xposal, etc... .

Juan C. Agui
IBM Spain  ...and...
U. Polit)cnica de Madrid.
From: pelegrin@geocub.greco-prog.fr (Francois PELLEGRINI)
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: Re: Raytracing on a CM
Date: 13 Apr 92 18:19:19 GMT
Distribution: fj

In article <1992Apr6.152259.21385@hubcap.clemson.edu> MXD120@psuvm.psu.edu (Beaker) writes:
>I have a friend who has access to a Connection Machine and we were
>thinking of compiling a raytracer on it (DKB or Rayshade) to create
>frames for animation.  I know that the code has to be optimized to
>run on a parallel machine, but I'm not sure how to do this.  Has
>anybody out there done this?  The most logical way, to me at least,
>of accomplishing this would be to send each line to a different
>processor.  Any ideas?


	Argh! The CM-2 is a SIMD machine. It implies that all processors must
do the same thing at the same time. As the ray trees will be quite different
from one pixel to another, (not even speaking of texture and shadow rays
computation), you will be in BIG trouble.
	Furthermore, as DKB is sequential, recompiling it will give you NO
optimization since it will just run on the front-end machine, not on the
CM processors.

	An idea may be to convert your processors into ray-processing
entities, picking rays into their own queues at the same time, eventually
doing nothing if their queue is empty. This amounts to splitting the
rendering equation and adding small contributions to each pixel as rays are
processed. Since you still cannot compute textures, you may have to read them
from bitmaps. Good programming job anyway...	8^}

								f.p.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   Zeu<FP> : The craziest programmer in France  |         _________          |
|------------------------------------------------|     /   |        \   \     |
| Francois Pellegrini is :                       |    /    |__   ___/    \    |
|        pelegrin@geocub.greco-prog.fr           |    \    |     |       /    |
|         pelegrin@prof.greco-prog.fr            |     \   |     |      /     |
|                                                |                            |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: primeaux@duncan.cs.utk.edu (David Primeaux)
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: concurrent file system on the iPSC RX
Date: 6 Apr 92 15:22:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: nttlab.283111
Distribution: fj

I have some questions about the concurrent file system on
the iPSC RX.  

What would happen if two nodes tried to read and/or write
to a cfs file simultaneously?

I would hope cfs performance is faster than file access through
the host node.  What is the (ball park) difference in performance?
Does the presence of other cfs users affect performance?

How much slower is cfs file access when compared to:
        a)  local memory access
        b)  inter-node communication

Does the size of the memory on the cfs vary from one system
to another?  If so, what are the ranges?


If you have answers about any of these questions, I would certainly
like to hear from you.  

Thanks!

-- David Primeaux
From: fpst@hubcap.clemson.edu (Steve Stevenson-Moderator)
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: No news for the remainder of the week...
Date: 7 Apr 92 11:43:13 GMT
Distribution: fj

I'll be out of town the rest of the week doing professorial sorts of
nonsense. If I get a chance, I'll try to post on Thursday.

Steve

=========================== MODERATOR ==============================
Steve Stevenson                            fpst@hubcap.clemson.edu
Administrative address                     steve@hubcap.clemson.edu
Department of Computer Science,            comp.parallel
Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-1906 (803)656-5880.mabell
From: rminnich@super.super.org (Ronald G Minnich)
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: Re: Atomic read/writes to memory in SMMs
Date: 13 Apr 92 18:19:19 GMT
Distribution: fj

In a discussion on atomic writes/reads of 32-bit data to a memory, 
i.e. not splitting it up into 16-bit chunks:

>](yours truly) foolishly wrote:
>]oh, i see now. Well, if anyone out there can think of a multiprocessor, 
>]BUILT AFTER 1980 ...

In article <1992Apr8.222145.4896@alliant.com> tj@alliant.com (Tom Jaskiewicz) writes:
>The FX/8 was announced in 1985.

and Ken reminded me that the Butterfly 1 counts too. 

So far, two commercial MPs from the mid-80s had this problem. Wow.
This all seems much farther back than 1985 ... time flies.
ron
p.s. Never ask the net to prove you wrong :-)
p.p.s. Do we get to have this problem all over again with 'long long i' ?
From: sc131109@seas.gwu.edu (Harmel K. Singh)
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: ++++++++++++++ Info on Massively parallel Machines
Date: 12 Apr 92 23:10:37 GMT
Distribution: fj

Hello ,

I would be obliged if somebody gave me info on the following
Massively Parallel machines.
Please let me know of articles, books, manuals etc which describe there 
architectures.

Machines are -
BB & N GP100
INTEL iPSC/2 VX
N CUBE 10
Amatek 2010
Connection Machine
Meiko Computing Surface

all responses will be highly appreciated.

Thank You,

Harmel Singh
Email - sc131109@seas.gwu.edu
=======================================================================
From: rminnich@super.super.org (Ronald G Minnich)
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: Re: Atomic read/writes to memory in SMMs
Date: 6 Apr 92 15:23:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: nttlab.283118
Distribution: fj

In article <1992Apr1.165233.12597@hubcap.clemson.edu> kweber@mcs.kent.edu (Ken Weber) writes:
>What percentage (roughly) of 32 bit Shared Memory Multiprocessors allow
>atomic load/store operations for 16 & 32 bit data?  For example, the
>Sequent Balance and Symmetry systems allow this.  Is it true for the
>majority of such systems?

I assume you mean atomic read-modify-write (RMW)?

Balance did not. I.e. the RMW instructions of the 320xx were not 
atomic RMW over the bus. There is a warning to this effect in one 
of the Sequent manuals. Instead there was an atomic 
lock memory. I am told this
was due to a bug (not surprising) in the 32032. 

Memory tells me that Burroughs did/does on all its multiprocessors, as
does IBM. 

Actually most of the multiprocessors that have shared memory that I can 
recall support atomic RMW. Of course, this will fail for the new
architectures such as Alpha. Getting an understanding of the memory model of
that system is proving to be a little confusing, if interesting.
ron
From: jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (J Eric Townsend)
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: Re: Raytracing on a CM
Date: 16 Apr 92 12:21:40 GMT
Distribution: fj

alan@msc.edu (I think that's it) once gave me some source he'd written
for a primitive raytracer on the CM.  (As I'm working on a MIMD tracer
aimed at making movies of molecules, I decided to find *anything*
having to do with parallel ray tracing.)

Unfortunately, I don't have a CM handy to test it on.  However, if you
ask Alan politely, he'll probably give you a copy more recent than the
one I have.

Somebody wrote:
>Not necessarily.  Careful reorganization of the algorithms may let you
>take advantage of the CM-2.  Of course, this is just off the top of my
>head and not a statement based on a careful analysis of how well this
>problem maps to the CM architecture.

You might want to look at some of the work done with vectorizing ray
tracers.  It's a similar problem in that ray tracing isn't that
vectorizable, so things have to be seriously reorganized to get
anything done in a reasonable amount of time.

A bit of groundless speculation:  what about dumping ray tracing
except for final image generation, and doing the "real" work via
radiosity (which makes really nice pictures :-).  If you want, you
could do radiositize->ray trace specular->reradiositize->ray trace
final image or some such.  Go back and forth between a CM and a MIMD
machine.

(On a related front -- I heard a rumor that CM-5's aren't shipping
with vector or high-end floating point support.  Is this true?  Are
they really scalar + sparc floating only?)



--
J. Eric Townsend - jet@uh.edu - Systems Wrangler, UH Dept of Mathematics
Note! New vox number: (713) 743-3466  '91 CB750, DoD# 0378
     Want to report illegal or corrupt activities by a federal agency?
        Call the Federally-sponsored Whistleblower BBS: 202.225.5527
From: tkm@eos.ncsu.edu (Dr. Tom Miller)
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: System memory overhead on parallel machines
Date: 6 Apr 92 23:04:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: nttlab.283282
Distribution: fj

I need to know the per-node memory overhead (the amount of memory consumed
by the run-time kernel and any other run-time system memory overhead)
for any or all of the following parallel machines:

Intel iWARP
Intel IPSC/860
Intel Paragon
nCUBE/2
Meiko Computing Surface (with i860 processors)

Please send replies to tkm@ncsu.edu.  Thanks,

Tom Miller
From: suzuki@alp0.cs.uec.ac.jp (Suzuki Takuzi)
Newsgroups: fj.lang.misc
Subject: Re: date notation
Date: 9 Apr 92 03:16:03 GMT
	<1992Apr8.111827.4998@reeth.ncl.ac.uk>
	<TOSHI.92Apr9020535@ostrich.nml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Organization: Dept. of Comput. Sci. and Info. Math., University of
	Electro-Communications.
In-reply-to: toshi@nml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp's message of 8 Apr 92 17:05:35 GMT


  $@NkLZ!w#U#E#C$H?=$7$^$9!%(J

In article <TOSHI.92Apr9020535@ostrich.nml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> toshi@nml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Toshio HORI) writes:

 |$@KM$O!"%W%m%0%i%`$r:n@.!?=$@5$7$?F|IU$O(J
 |	  1992/04/09
 |$@$N$h$&$K(J "[$@@>Nq(J]/[$@7n(J]/[$@F|(J]" $@$H$$$&7A$GF~$l$F$^$9!#(J

  $@F|K\?M$J$i(J JIS $@$r;H$*$&!*!JGz>P!K(J

  JIS X 0301 $@$K$h$j$^$9$H!$@>NqI=5-$J$i(J
   ($@Bh#17A<0(J) 920409 $@$^$?$O(J 19920409
   ($@Bh#27A<0$N#1(J) 92-04-09 $@$^$?$O(J 1992-04-09
   ($@Bh#27A<0$N#2(J) 92 04 09 $@$^$?$O(J 1992 04 09
$@$H=q$-!$OBNrI=5-$J$i(J
   ($@Bh#37A<0(J) 04.04.09 $@$^$?$O(J H04.04.09
$@$H=q$/$=$&$G$9!%(J

  $@;d$O(J 1992-04-09 $@$H=q$-$^$9!%$?$V$s!J9q:]E*$K$b!K0lHV8m(J$@2r$5$l$K$/$$$H(J
$@;W$&$N$G!%(J

--
$@NkLZBn<#(J@$@>pJs9)3X(JD3.$@EEDLBg1!(J (suzuki@alp0.cs.uec.ac.jp)
Newsgroups: fj.lang.misc
From: utashiro@InterTech.COM (Kazumasa Utashiro)
Subject: Re: date notation
Organization: InterTech Data Systems, Inc., Cupertino, CA
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 03:44:48 GMT

In article <7166@coins.is.tsukuba.ac.jp>
	yas@gama.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (Yasushi Shinjo) writes:

>	% strings /usr/lib/libc.a | egrep / | less
>
>$B$7$F$_$F2<$5$$!#(B Berkeley $B$N$b$N$O!"JF9q<0$HF|K\<0$,N>J}:.$8$C(B
>$B$F$$$k$_$?$$!#(B

	% mg -Be '\w\w/\w\w' /usr/lib/libc.a

$B$9$k$H!"$I$N%U%!%$%k$KF~$C$F$$$k$+$b$o$+$C$?$j$7$^$9!#(B
(v1.4$B0J>e(B)

$B$b$C$H$bF|IU$NJ}$O(B SCCS $B$NJ8;zNs$@$m$&$+$i%U%!%$%kL>$OI,MW$J(B
$B$$$G$7$g$&$1$I!"%Q%9L>$NJ}$K$OLrN)$A$^$9!#(B

--utashiro						($B9-9p(B)
From: toshi@nml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Toshio HORI)
Newsgroups: fj.lang.misc
Subject: Re: date notation
Date: 8 Apr 92 17:05:35 GMT
	<1992Apr8.111827.4998@reeth.ncl.ac.uk>
Organization: Nagao&Mitsuishi Lab., Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of
	Tokyo, Japan.

$@$I$b$I$b!"KY!wElBg5!3#$G$9!#(J

In article <1992Apr8.111827.4998@reeth.ncl.ac.uk>
	kono@reeth.ncl.ac.uk (Shinji Kono) writes:
>In article <M-TAJIRI.92Apr8112725@spld2.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp> , 
>	 m-tajiri@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp writes 
>>$@;d$O!"(J[$@7n(J]/[$@F|(J]/92 $@$N$h$&$KI=5-$7$F!"%=!<%9$K=q$$$F$$$k$N$G!J0J2<N,!K(J
>$@$=$$$D$O%"%a%j%+<0$G$9!#%$%.%j%9$G$O!"(J[$@F|(J]/[$@7n(J]/92$@$J$N$h$s!#(J

$@$J$k$[$I!#KM$O$I$A$i$N=q$-J}$b8+$?$3$H$,$"$j$^$9$,!"$I$C$A$,$I$C$A$+$O(J
$@$h$/CN$j$^(J$@$;$s$G$7$?!#$G$b!"$3$&$$$&=q$-J}$C$F47$l$F$$$J$$?M$K$H$C$F$O(J
$@J6$i$o$7$$$G$9$h$M!#!VF|!W$,#1#3F|$r1[$((J$@$F$$$l$P!X$"$!!"$3$C$A$,!VF|!W(J
$@$G!"$3$C$A$,!V7n!W$@$J!Y$C$F$$$&$N$,!JEvA3$J$,$i(J:-)$@!K$o$+$k$s$G$9$,!"(J
$@$$$-$J$j$3$NI=8=$,$5$l$F$$$k$H!"K\J8$r8+$FH=CG$9$k$7$+$J$$$o$1$G$9!J$3(J
$@$l$^$GKM$OJF<0!?1Q<0$N6hJL$rCN(J$@$i$J$+$C$?$N$G$J$*$5$i$N$3$H!K!#(J

>>$@$_$J$5$s$I$&=q$$$F$$$^$9$+!)(J
>$@7n$r(JApr$@$H$+=q$/$H$$$&J}K!$b$"$j$^$9(J$@!#(Jdate$@$N(Joutput$@$O$A$g$C$HD9$$$M!#(J

$@KM$O!"%W%m%0%i%`$r:n@.!?=$@5$7$?F|IU$O(J

	1992/04/09

$@$N$h$&$K(J "[$@@>Nq(J]/[$@7n(J]/[$@F|(J]" $@$H$$$&7A$GF~$l$F$^$9!#$G$b!"2OLn$5$s!J$"$k(J
$@$$$O!"(Jdate$@$N=PNO!K$N$h$&$K!X7n!Y$K4X$7$F$O1Q8l(J$@$GF~$l$F$7$^$&$H$$$&J}K!(J
$@$b$"$k$+$bCN$l$^$;$s$M!#(J

$@$G$O$G$O!#(J
From: k2@tonbi.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Kazuki Koketsu)
Newsgroups: fj.lang.misc
Subject: Re: date notation
Date: 13 Apr 92 02:19:43 GMT
Distribution: fj
Organization: Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Japan

In article <RACSHO.92Apr9092457@cbsws1.cbs.canon.co.jp> racsho@cbs.canon.co.jp (Nishijima ``Racsho'' Takanori) writes:
>$B$K$7$8$^!w%-%d%N%s$G$9!#(B
>	$BF|(B/$B7n(B/$BG/(B $B$,1Q9q<0(B

$B%h!<%m%C%Q7O$O$@$$$?$$$3$l$G$9$M!#K\2H$O$I$3$J$s$G$7$g$&!)(B
-- 
$@ever(J $@0l5/(J(KOKETSU Kazuki)$@!wElBgCO?L8&(J(Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo)
$@L>;z(J(JIS 6576,6572)$@$O8EBe@w$a$NL>A0$@$=$&$G(J,$@Ic?F$O4tIl8)B?<#8+IU6a$N=P?H$G$9(J.
From: kono@reeth.ncl.ac.uk (Shinji Kono)
Newsgroups: fj.lang.misc
Subject: Re: date notation
Date: 8 Apr 92 11:18:27 GMT
Reply-To: kono@csl.sony.co.jp
Organization: Sony Computer Science Laboratory, Inc.

$@2OLn(J@CSL.Sony$@$G$9!#(J
In article <M-TAJIRI.92Apr8112725@spld2.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp> , 
	m-tajiri@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp writes 
>$@;d$O!"(J[$@7n(J]/[$@F|(J]/92 $@$N$h$&$KI=5-$7$F!"%=!<%9$K=q$$$F$$$k$N$G(J
>$@$9$,!"$J$s$H$J$/$=$&=q$$$F$$$k$@$1$G$"$C$F!"$h$/$o$+$j$^$;$s!#(J

$@$=$$$D$O%"%a%j%+<0$G$9!#%$%.%j%9$G$O!"(J[$@F|(J]/[$@7n(J]/92$@$J$N$h$s!#(J

>$@$_$J$5$s$I$&=q$$$F$$$^$9$+!)(J

$@7n$r(JApr$@$H$+=q$/$H$$$&J}K!$b$"$j$^$9!#(Jdate$@$N(Joutput$@$O$A$g$C$HD9$$$M!#(J
-- 
Shinji Kono @ Computing Laboratory, University Newcastle upon Tyne
kono@csl.sony.co.jp                                Room: 812 Daysh
from Sony Computer Science Laboratory, Inc,Japan                UK
From: okuyama@trl.ibm.co.jp (Kenichi Okuyama)
Newsgroups: fj.lang.misc
Subject: Re: date notation
Date: 8 Apr 92 13:10:07 GMT
	<M-TAJIRI.92Apr8112725@spld2.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp>
Organization: IBM Research, Tokyo Research Laboratory
In-reply-to: m-tajiri@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp's message of 8 Apr 92 11:27:25 GMT

$@1|;3!w#I#B#M$G$9!#(J

In article <M-TAJIRI.92Apr8112725@spld2.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp> m-tajiri@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp (Motohide Tajiri) writes:
 >$@;d$O!"(J[$@7n(J]/[$@F|(J]/92 $@$N(J$@$h$&$KI=5-$7$F!"%=!<%9$K=q$$$F$$$k$N$G(J
 >$@$9$,!"$J$s$H$J$/$=$&=q$$$F$$$k$@$1$G$"$C$F!"$h$/$o$+$j$^$;$s(J$@!#(J

$@Nc$($P(J 1/20/'66 $@$J$i!"(J

	"January the twentieth of nine-teen sixty-six"

$@$H$$$&$$$$J}$r!"$=$N$^$^(J$@;z$KMn$7$?$@$1$@!"$H$-$$$F$$$^$9!#<+?.$O$J$$(J
$@$G$9$,!J%9%Z%k$b!D!K!#(J

$@!t(J $@#M!?#D!?$N8e$m$KG/$r=q$/$J$i!"(J$@!X#1#9#9#2!Y$d!X!G#9#2!Y$O$"$C$F$b(J
$@!t(J $@$?$@$N!X#9#2!Y$O@>Nq#9#2G/$rI=$9$=$&$G$9$,!D!#(J
--
		   $@!D(J Phantom of the News/FORUM $@!D(J
		$@1|;3(J $@7r0l!wEl5~4pAC8&5f=j(J.$@F|K\#I#B#M!J3t!K(J
Beneath the News system, I know he's there.  He's with me on the post, he's everywhere.
And when I C-c C-c, I always find,  THE PHANTOM OF THE NEWS is there inside my mind.........
From: racsho@cbs.canon.co.jp (Nishijima ``Racsho'' Takanori)
Newsgroups: fj.lang.misc
Subject: Re: date notation
Date: 9 Apr 92 00:24:57 GMT
	<M-TAJIRI.92Apr8112725@spld2.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp>
Distribution: fj
Organization: Peripherals Development Center 1, Canon Inc., Tokyo, JAPAN
In-reply-to: m-tajiri@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp's message of 8 Apr 92 11:27:25 GMT

$B$K$7$8$^!w%-%d%N%s$G$9!#(B

In article <M-TAJIRI.92Apr8112725@spld2.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp>, m-tajiri@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp (Motohide Tajiri) writes:

 > $B;d$O!"(B[$B7n(B]/[$BF|(B]/92 $B$N$h$&$KI=5-$7$F!"%=!<%9$K=q$$$F$$$k$N$G(B
 > $B$9$,!"$J$s$H$J$/$=$&=q$$$F$$$k$@$1$G$"$C$F!"$h$/$o$+$j$^$;$s!#(B

 > $BJF9q$H1Q9q$G0c$&$H$+!#!#(B

 > $B$_$J$5$s$I$&=q$$$F$$$^$9$+!)(B

	$BG/(B/$B7n(B/$BF|(B $B$,F|K\<0(B
	$B7n(B/$BF|(B/$BG/(B $B$,JF9q<0(B
	$BF|(B/$B7n(B/$BG/(B $B$,1Q9q<0(B

$B$@$C$?$+$H;W$$$^$9(B($B0l35$K$b8@$($J$$$s$G$7$g$&$,(B)$B!#F|IU$r(B
$B>F$-9~$a$k%+%a%i$J$s$+$O$$$:$l$+$NJ}<0$,A*Br$G$-$^$9$h$M!#(B
$B$D$$$3$J$$$@$^$G$O(B $BG/(B/$B7n(B/$BF|(B $B$G=q$$$F$$$?$s$G$9$,!"%"%a%j%+(B
$B$N2q<R$H$d$j$H$j$9$k$3$H$,A}$($?$?$a!"8m2r$rHr$1$k$h$&$K(B
$B:G6a$O(B

	Apr.9,1992

$B$H=q$/$3$H$,B?$$$G$9!#(B
--
$B!H4pK\$O$m$^$N$S$s$G$#(B($B0UL#ITL@(B)$B!I(B
$B@>Eg(B $B9'FA(B (NISHIJIMA, Takanori)   $B%-%d%N%s3t<02q<R(B $B<~JU5!4oBh0l3+H/%;%s%?!<(B
E-mail: racsho@cbs.canon.co.jp
From: yas@gama.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (Yasushi Shinjo)
Newsgroups: fj.lang.misc
Subject: Re: date notation
Date: 10 Apr 92 20:13:58 GMT

$@?7>k!wC^GHBg3X$G$9!#$3$s$K$A$O!#(J

From article <RACSHO.92Apr9092457@cbsws1.cbs.canon.co.jp>,
	by racsho@cbs.canon.co.jp (Nishijima ``Racsho'' Takanori):
> $@$K$7$8$^!w%-%d%N%s$G$9!#(J
> 	$@G/(J/$@7n(J/$@F|(J $@$,F|K\<0(J
> 	$@7n(J/$@F|(J/$@G/(J $@$,JF9q<0(J
> 	$@F|(J/$@7n(J/$@G/(J $@$,1Q9q<0(J

$@#S#u#n$N%P%$%J%j$r(J strings $@%3%^%s%I$G8+$F$_$k$H!"F|K\<0$K$J$C(J
$@$F$$$^$9!#<j85$N%o!<%/%9%F!<%7%g%s!J#S#u#n$G$J$/$F$b#N#F#S$,(J
$@$"$l$P$@$$$?$$J?5$!"$+$J!K$G!"(J

	% strings /usr/lib/libc.a | egrep / | less

$@$7$F$_$F2<$5$$!#(J Berkeley $@$N$b$N$O!"JF9q<0$HF|K\<0$,N>J}:.$8$C(J
$@$F$$$k$_$?$$!#(J

$@F|K\<0$O!"C1=c$KJ8;zNs$H$7$F%=!<%H$7$?;~$K$A$c$s$H;~4V$N=g=x(J
$@$GJB$V$N$G!"JXMx$G$9$h$M!#(J

$@!@!@!!?7>k!!Lw!!!J$7$s$8$g$&!!$d$9$7!K!!!@!@(J
$@!@!@!!C^GHBg3X!!EE;R!&>pJs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@!@(J

PostScript
strings | egrep / | less $@$O!"%3%^%s%I$,$I$s$J%U%!%$%k$r3+$-(J
$@$=$&$+D4$Y$k;~$KJXMx$G$9!#(J
Newsgroups: fj.lang.misc
From: m-tajiri@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp (Motohide Tajiri)
Subject: date notation
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 11:27:25 GMT
Reply-To: m-tajiri@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp
Organization: NEC Microcomputer Technology Ltd., Tokyo, Japan

# subject $@$O<+?.$,$"$j$^$;$s!#(J

In article <1992Apr3.121009.15341@reeth.ncl.ac.uk>
	 kono@reeth.ncl.ac.uk (Shinji Kono) writes:
> fj.lang $@$N2<$K(J$@?7$7$$(JNG$@$r:n$m$&$H$$$&Ds0F$G$9!#(J

> $@0[5A$,$J$1$l$P(J14/04/92$@$K@.N)$7$^$9!#(J

$@CN$C$F$$$k?M$K$*J9$-$7$?$$$N(J$@$G$9$,!"(J
$@F|IU$r=q$/;~$O$3$N$h$&$KI=5-$9$k$N$G$7$g$&$+!)(J

$@;d$O!"(J[$@7n(J]/[$@F|(J]/92 $@$N$h$&$KI=5-$7$F!"%=!<%9$K(J$@=q$$$F$$$k$N$G(J
$@$9$,!"$J$s$H$J$/$=$&=q$$$F$$$k$@$1$G$"$C$F!"$h$/$o$+$j$^$;$s!#(J

$@JF9q$H1Q9q$G0c$&$H$+!#(J$@!#(J

$@$_$J$5$s$I$&=q$$$F$$$^$9$+!)(J

$@ED?,85=(!*(Jm-tajiri@ccs.mt.nec.co.jp
From: pongsak@camphor.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp (Pongsak MAHACHOKLERTWATTANA)
Newsgroups: fj.lang.lisp
Subject: search for CMU Lisp (Reply)
Date: 6 Apr 92 05:22:40 GMT
Distribution: fj
Organization: Electr. Eng. II, Kyoto Univ., Kyoto, Japan.

In article <PONGSAK.92Apr3161744@forest.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp> pongsak@forest.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp (Pongsak Mahachoklertwattana) writes:

 >Path: kuee!pongsak
 >From: pongsak@forest.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp (Pongsak Mahachoklertwattana)
 >Newsgroups: fj.lang.lisp
 >Date: 3 Apr 92 07:17:44 GMT
 >Sender: news@kuee.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp
 >Distribution: fj
 >Organization: Electr. Eng. II, Kyoto Univ., Kyoto, Japan.
 >Lines: 11
 >
 >$@%]%s%5%C%/(J@$@5~Bg$G$9!#(J
 >$@3'$5$s$K$*?R$M$7$?$$$G$9$,!"(JCMU Lisp , ILisp , CLOS $@$rF~<j$7$?$$$G$9$,!"(J
 >$@9qFb$G(Jftp$@$G$-$k$H$3$m$r$4B8CN$NJ}$,$$$i$C$7$c$$$^$7$?$i!"$o$?$7$^$G(J
 >$@%a!<%k$r(J$@2<$5$k$+!"$3$N(JNG$@$K%U%)%m!<$7$F$/$@$5$$!#(J
 >$@9qFb$K$J$1$l$P!"3$30$N3N$+$JF~<j@h$r65$($F2<$5$$!#(J
 >$@$h$m$7(J$@$/$*4j$$$7$^$9!#(J
 >
 >--
 >
 >				    pongsak@forest.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp
 >				$@%]%s%5%C%/(J $@5~ETBg3XEE5$(J$@BhFs3X2JD9Hx8&5f<<(J  

$@>e$N%K%e!<%9$r%]%9%H$7$?$H$3$m!"5~Bg>pJs9)3X$N86ED$5$s!"(JATR$@<+F0K]LuEEOC8&5f=j(J
$@$N(J$@1JED$5$s$+$i$4JV;v$rD:$-$^$7$F$"$j$,$H$&$4$6$$$^$7$?!#(J
$@JV;v$r$^$H$a$k$H!"$@$$$?$$$3$s$J$H$3$m$G$9!#(J

  $@!t5~Bg$K$O(J SUN4 /Sparc $@MQ$N(J cmu lisp $@$,(J ftp.kuis $@$N(J ~ftp/lang/cmu-cl $@$N2<$K(J
    $@$"$k$=$&$G$9!#(J
  $@!t(Jlisp $@4XO"$N(J archieve $@$,$"$k$N$O!"(J
   
    ftp.scrl.aoyama.ac.jp ($@@D;3Bg3X(J)

    $@$0$i$$$@$=$&$G$9!#(J
  $@!t(JATR $@$K$O!"(JCMUCL $@$N:G?7HG(J 15e $@$H(J ILisp $@$N:G?7HG$H$,!"$"$k$H$$$&$3$H$G$9!#(J

$@$^$?!"$J$K$+$N>pJs$,$"$C$?(J$@$i!"@'Hs65$($FD:$-$?$$$H;W$$$^$9!#(J

  
--

                                  pongsak@forest.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp
                              $@%]%s%5%C%/(J $@5~ETBg3XEE5$BhFs3X2JD9Hx8&5f<<(J
From: kazuto@cc.aoyama.ac.jp (Kazuto "hogehoge" Nishi)
Newsgroups: fj.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: search for CMU Lisp (Reply)
Date: 7 Apr 92 08:12:57 GMT
Distribution: fj
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin Univ.
In-reply-to: pongsak@camphor.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp's message of 6 Apr 92 05:22:40 GMT

$B$I$&$b!"$+$:$H!w@D3X(J $B$G$9!#(J

In article <PONGSAK.92Apr6142240@camphor.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp> pongsak@camphor.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp (Pongsak MAHACHOKLERTWATTANA) writes:
 |  $B!t5~Bg$K$O(J SUN4 /Sparc $BMQ$N(J cmu lisp $B$,(J ftp.kuis $B$N(J ~ftp/lang/cmu-cl $B$N2<$K(J
 |    $B$"$k$=$&$G$9!#(J
 |  $B!t(Jlisp $B4XO"$N(J archieve $B$,$"$k$N$O!"(J
 |   
 |    ftp.scrl.aoyama.ac.jp ($B@D;3Bg3X(J)
 |
 |    $B$0$i$$$@$=$&$G$9!#(J

$B>e5-$N%"%I%l%9$O>/$74V0c$C$F$*$j$^$7$F(J (^_^;)$B!"(J
$B@53N$K$O(J

	ftp.csrl.aoyama.ac.jp (133.2.1.5)
            ^^^^
$B$G$9!#%]%s%5%C%/!w5~Bg$5$s$N5-;v$K$"$k$h$&$K<g$K(J LISP $B4X78$N$b$N$r07$C(J
$B$F$*$j$^$9!#(J

--
--
$B@D;33X1!Bg3X>pJs2J3X8&5f%;%s%?!<(J  $B%"%7%9%H(J  $B@>(J  $BOB?M(J
kazuto@cc.aoyama.ac.jp