HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: leo@ph.tn.tudelft.nl (Leo Breebaart)
Subject: Re: Yawn.
Reply-To: leo@ph.tn.tudelft.nl
Organization: Delft University of Technology
Distribution: alt
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 11:47:01 GMT

gnat@kauri.vuw.ac.nz (Nathan Torkington) writes:

> This group sure goes downhill as soon as the object of worship
> arrives.  Suddenly we're all trying to outdo each other with puns, 

So I am not the only one to have noticed this! 
Since Terry Pratchett arrived, folks have been sparkling and witty and 
funny, and I can't recall this group being such a bundle of laughs two months
ago -- we're not trying to impress anybody here, are we?

I noticed more or less the same thing when Pratchett gave a talk at
the Dutch WorldCon two years ago. Most of the 'questions' from the audience 
were not actual questions, but would all start with "Have you ever
considered...", and then that person would be off on some long, involved
idea of what he thought would make a hilarious few pages in the next
DiscWorld novel. Arf.

No, I not slamming the recent *explicit* "let's come up with DiscWorld ideas"-
thread in this group. I'm not even against the attempts to out-pun
and out-Pratchett Pratchett: I have seen some enjoyable stuff so far, so
Nathan's yawn seems misplaced to me.

But I have to agree with him that it is remarkable how all of a sudden 
everybody has become a comic. What is it about the presence of someone
like Terry Pratchett that makes us react this way?

-- 
Leo Breebaart  (leo @ ph.tn.tudelft.nl)
From: gpvos@cs.vu.nl (Gerben 'P' Vos)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
Subject: Re: Patrician's assassination, plus two questions
Date: 24 Jul 92 13:23:11 GMT

mwlucas@vela.acs.oakland.edu writes:

>>This is the only newsgroup that I've been on since its creation that hasn't
>>had a good, old-fashioned, all-out flamefest/rumorfest/backstabbing-growling-
                                               ^^^^^^^^^
>>throwing-things-even-quite-heavy-furniture-fest.

Well, some rumours actually. But not a fest, indeed, and i suspect even the
rumours aren't necessary anymore since a few weeks...

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G e r b e n   V o s   <><
Aconet: 8500/104!Gerben Vos  Internet: gpvos@cs.vu.nl
[1] UNIX is a trademark of Unix Systems Laboratories, a subsidiary of AT&T[2].
[2] AT&T is a modem test command.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: mblaser@nyx.cs.du.edu (mike blaser)
Subject: Re: O-levels and A-levels (Re: Patrician's assassination, plus two questions)
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 16:41:20 GMT

lpj@col.hp.com (Laura Johnson) writes:

>winalski@adserv.enet.dec.com (Paul S. Winalski) writes:
>> 
>> The O-levels and A-levels are achievement examinations.  Kind of like the
>> College Board Achievement Tests in the U.S., except given in a lot more
>> subjects and not used just for college admission.
>> 
>> --PSW

>I've gotten (somewhere) the impression that O=Ordinary and A=Advanced,
>thus making A-levels the more difficult...is this right?

>-Laura

Yep, that's right.  And A levels can be rather nasty if you let them.

Fox
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  /\_/\ F    
  \O O/ O               "What is a figment anyway?" 
   \o/  X 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: uhschreg@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Ulrich Schreglmann)
Subject: Re: Erm. Excuse me?
Organization: Student Pool, CSD, University of Erlangen, Germany
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 14:40:48 GMT

ac463@yfn.ysu.edu (Rich Yauman) writes:

>Did you notice that the only DW character that knows how to spell, is 
>the dead leader of the dead rights group in Reaper Man.  I wonder if
>we will see this character again.

I don't think so. As far as I remember he died in the end.
-- ceased.
-- whatever!

Youe meanne beecausse thee otherres spelle lyke thysse?


Maye the Coolle bee wythe Youe!

(C)OOL mcmxcyye
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: lpj@col.hp.com (Laura Johnson)
Subject: Re: Johnny and the Dead
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 21:00:39 GMT
Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division

Elizabeth.Mccoy@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Elizabeth Mccoy) writes:
> 
> "YA title"....
> 

Young Adult. Means it's just a normal book, but the protagonist is
underage, so the libraries hide it from you.

-- 
lpj@hpctdls.col.hp.com
Opinions expressed are my own, but may be licensed for a nominal fee.

Organization: Center for Machine Translation, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 21:52:42 -0400 
From: John Robert Leavitt <jl3j+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: UK Books and Hedgehog paraphernalia

Folks-

I have a couple of quick questions:

1) What are the DW books that are available in the UK that have not made it to
the US yet and in what editions do they exist?  I know of Eric (in the illo'ed
edition and an un-illo'ed as well I believe) and Witches Abroad, both in paper-
back and there is Little Gods in hardcover, yes?  A friend of mine will be
in London next week and I need to prepare a shopping list for her (for me).
Any bookstore recommendations (or comments like "oh, any such-and-such-chain
bookstore will have them") would also be helpful.
2) This is the strange request (and, *NO*, it does not have anything to do
with a certain DW bar song of legend and ill-repute), but are there any shops
in London where one can find hedgehog paraphernalia?  I know here in the states
there are stores (in various cities) specializing in cat stuff, and teddy bear
stuff, and even pig stuff, but I have a desire for hedgehog stuff (particularly
large tack lawn ornaments would be ideal, but I think that that might be asking
too much).  ANy suggestion?

-John.

John Leavitt, Center for Machine Translation, Carnegie-Mellon University
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: rsholmes@rodan.syr.EDU (Rich Holmes)
Subject: Re: Patrician's assassination, plus two questions
In-reply-to: bronson@engr.latech.edu's message of Sat, 25 Jul 1992 05:39:00 GMT
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
	<dxgmprg.jrs@netcom.com> <1992Jul24.203609.24523@aber.ac.uk>
	<1992Jul25.053900.4536@engr.latech.edu>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 92 17:48:47 EDT

In article <1992Jul25.053900.4536@engr.latech.edu> bronson@engr.latech.edu (Patrick K. Bronson) writes:

>Ah HA!  I knew I was right.  It was pointed out that I had made the mistake of
>spelling license as licence on a database report.  As several areas of our
>campus police use this program, and the results are sent on to one of our 
>many Vice Presidents, I felt pretty stupid!  Turns out I had inadvertantly
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I'm not gonna say it... I'm NOT gonna say it...

--
  - Rich Holmes - - - - - - - - - - - - - rsholmes@mailbox.syr.edu -
	WARNING: This .sig has been cruelly tested on animals.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: mblaser@nyx.cs.du.edu (mike blaser)
Subject: Re: DW setting and typoes
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 02:19:46 GMT

garton@jeeves.ucsd.edu (Simon Garton) writes:


>Intriguing ... I have the English hard cover edition, and here
>they got the spacing right, and the YES is on a left hand page,
>I loved the effect... similar to Death ALWAYS SPEAKING IN TONES
>SOUNDING LIKE LEAD SLABS FALLING ON GRANITE etc etc. What copy
>do you have ? I dread to think what the US producers could
>do with that bit : just put it in ordinary capitals tucked
>beneath Deaths OWN WORDS.

I believe that was the case in the Corgi Paperback edition aswell.

>In the meantime, where does Azrael (the name) come from ... I
>know I have heard it before.

I could be (probably am) wrong but isn't/wasn't Azrael the Angel of Death?

Fox
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  /\_/\ F    
  \O O/ O          "To be, or not to be.  Who's askin'?" - Popeye              
   \o/  X 
Xref: sparky alt.fan.pratchett:1223 talk.bizarre:23771
From: rone@chort.usc.edu (Ron Echeverri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett,talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: You geeks
Date: 29 Jul 92 03:31:01 GMT
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: chort.usc.edu

In article <36239@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> garton@jeeves.ucsd.edu (Simon Garton) writes:
>In article <p2o4otUYGjkl@alcor.usc.edu> rone@skat.usc.edu (5150) writes:
)>I've been looking through this group and I've gotta say, what a bunch of
)>geeks you guys are. You spend all your time ass-licking this Pratchet guy
)>like he's good or something. Come on, Craig Shaw Gardener wipes the floor
)>with Pratchet, and that ain't saying much. His books are boring and
)>repetative, he just recycles the same tired old jokes again and again.
)>Why waste your time with such a looser?
)>-- 
)>Ron Echeverri                     |
><stuff deleted>
)>RUSH are way, way kool!!!

I wanted to clear: i did not post this article.  It is a forge.  I am sorry for
any trouble it has caused. (compare the paths)  if you ever see any inflamatory
articles of mine in the future, please consider they are almost always not mine

Ron Echeverri
5150
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: mblaser@nyx.cs.du.edu (Fox)
Subject: Re: New reader! Which book should I read first?
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 01:24:01 GMT

crystal@glia.biostr.washington.edu (Crystal) writes:

>Hi!

>I've had several people over the last few months mention that they thought
>I'd like this author.  But when I ask which one to start with, no one can 
>tell me!

>What is the first book in the disc world series?  Should they be read in 
>order?  What is the order?

>I just got this news group...

>Thanks!! 

>Crystal
>  ;>

Start with the first! That one is called _The Colour of Magic_. It's a
bit 'running gagy' but it's fun to read.  If you like that read its
continuation and conclusion in the second book, _The Light Fantastic_ and
then just go through the books in order after that, otherwise try
the fourth book, _Mort_, which seems to be one of the most popular.

Of you STILL don't like the Discworld after readin that then have
you tried Chaucer? <grin>

Fox

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  /\_/\ F    
  \O O/ O               "What is a figment anyway?" 
   \o/  X 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: leo@ph.tn.tudelft.nl (Leo Breebaart)
Subject: Re: Alligator Sandwich
Reply-To: leo@ph.tn.tudelft.nl
Organization: Delft University of Technology
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 18:57:35 GMT

ljc@otter.hpl.hp.com (Lee Carter) writes:

> This is a reference to a very, very old joke the correct rendition
> of which is; "Get me an alligator sandwich and make it SNAPPY. "
> Oui?

Oui.

Thanks for the many folks who explained this one to me -- I feel so stupid
now: I should have *known* this, dammit.

Particularly since I think this "sideways punning" is one of my favourite
Pratchettisms. Other fine example include (just to show you that I *do*
get, occasionally, at least *some* of Terry's jokes :-) the name of the
the blockbuster movie in "Moving Pictures": BLOWN AWAY; and the names of
the two heroines in that book: Ruby and Ginger.


-- 
Leo Breebaart  (leo @ ph.tn.tudelft.nl)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: tpratchett@cix.compulink.co.uk (Terry Pratchett)
Subject: Dropping in again...                    
Cc: tpratchett@cix.compulink.co.uk
Reply-To: tpratchett@cix.compulink.co.uk
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 17:32:15 +0000


Reviews:  While I appreciate the concern for my feelings that might lead
people NOT to post a 'negative' review, it wouldn't bother me (okay, "This
book really sucks..." and so on probably would).  But it seems to me that if
a genuinely considered negative review is avoided, the long-term health of
the conference might get a little shaky.  (Anyway, it could be argued that a
reviewer coherently explaining why he or she doesn't like a book might almost
be a positive review.)  Finally, I know from the mail that there isn't a DW
book out there which isn't _someone's_ favourite, so I'm fairly sanguine
about reviews of individual books. Let debate commence...

The annotated Pratchett: yes, well...fine.  I'd be surprised to find many
people, though, who _wouldn't_ spot the Gollum reference in Witches Abroad. I
take the view that nothing in the books should be opaque to the average
reader, and I assume I'm the average reader.

There do seem to be a lot of postings, but it'd be daft of me to object.  I
come on most days to pick up my mail and the other stuff just rolls in.  I
don't post every day because (a) life, it's too short and (b) surely you guys
want some discussion without me weighing in all the time.

Terry
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Yawn.
Organization: Taronga Park BBS
Distribution: alt
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 11:20:44 GMT

Check out alt.fan.goons. Lots less traffic, but lots of slavish imitation
of the masters and none of them have been sighted anywhere near Usenet. It's
just normal behaviour in alt.fan groups.
-- 
                                                                `-_-'
                         Have you hugged your wolf today?        'U`

Peter da Silva, Taronga Park BBS, Houston, TX  +1 713 568 0480/1032
Organisation: European Space Technology Centre (E.S.T.E.C)
Date: Saturday, 25 Jul 1992 22:21:55 CET
From: <IBRUNTON@ESTEC.BITNET>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
Subject: Re: Upcoming Stuff
 <1992Jul23.185040.1@fnalo.fnal.gov> <1992Jul25.180548.7572@news.ysu.edu>

ac463@yfn.ysu.edu (Rich Yauman) writes:

>I read Equal Rites,  mainly the reason I read the books in that order is
>that is the order in which I found copies of them.  I still know of
>one DW book that I haven't found, the first one with Rincewind.
>     Speaking of Rincewind,  I keep waiting for his return from the
>dungeon Dimensions.  Afterall, as the book Sourcery states, a wizzard
>always comes back for his hat.


  Rincewind returns in ERIC, which I understand was not published in the
'States.

  Which brings me to the question of the hat. The Eric illustrations
depict out hero in his hat, leading me to think that a brief re-union with
with his former boss (ook) would occur in the first few pages. Alas no.
Is this simply something that the continuity nymph with the iconograph
missed?

  C'mon TP, speak to me. My mate John will be soooo jealous.

Cheers,

IAn Brunton.    <><

IBRUNTON@ESTEC.BITNET
ibrunton@estec.estec.esa.nl
NLESADGL at IBMMAIL
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett,talk.bizarre
From: uhschreg@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Ulrich Schreglmann)
Subject: Re: You geeks
Organization: Student Pool, CSD, University of Erlangen, Germany
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 10:54:18 GMT

bradfiel@phakt.usc.edu (The B-field) writes:

>Well, he's had his say so let's just ignore him and keep up the IQ level
>of the Internet.

Yeah, let's not post any follow-ups to it.


May the Cool be with You!

(C)OOL mcmxcii
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: tpratchett@cix.compulink.co.uk (Terry Pratchett)
Subject: Re: Erm. Excuse me?                     
Cc: tpratchett@cix.compulink.co.uk
Reply-To: tpratchett@cix.compulink.co.uk
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 14:00:00 +0000

Well, to prove I wasn't mad I just ran a word check on the entire DW files
and I'M pretty sure the whole tiger/eternal flame sequence turns up only in
Sourcery.  There was a dungeon scene in WS, yes, but with a whole range of
fresh (well, more or less fresh) dungeon gags.

Terry
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: tdc1004@dircon.co.uk (Barry Freeman)
Subject: Re: DW ideas
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 18:43:45 GMT

tpratchett@cix.compulink.co.uk (Terry Pratchett) writes:

>Anyone posting DW ideas: PLEASE put on the top TERRY, DON'T READ THIS.  I
>hate people giving me DW ideas -- if they're good, I'm stealing, if they're
>not, what the hell...Dozens of people have 'suggested' a DW newspapers plot,
>and 20,000 words of that one has existed for more than two years.  But it's
>in obeyance for various reasons (it seemed to be getting too much like MP)
>
>Terry
 
Ok, Everyone,
Before posting DW ideas, make sure you include the following:
 
THIS DW IDEA IS FREELY RELEASED INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN FOR
ANYONE TO USE FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER.
 
The Terry can use them without feeling guilty.
BAzz
-- 
+-------------------------------------+---------------------------+
| TDC1004@dircon.co.uk                |  \__/  'Hey, Laser-Lips,  |
| The Fox's Den BBS +44-(0)689-827085 |  |oo|     Yer mother was  |
| Bazz@compulink.co.uk                |  :==:      a snow-blower!'|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
Subject: Re: Comic Books 
From: mduhan@husc10.harvard.edu (Matthew Duhan)
Date: 24 Jul 92 20:30:12 EDT
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

  Currently, _Innovation_ Comics has done the four parts to TCOM and
is on issue 1 of TLF.  Number 2 is due out around the end of August,
but with Innovation, it could be as long as six months!  TCOM was
OK, the look of the characters was good, but IMHO it wasn't great, as
subtle jokes were either spelled out or left out for reasons of space.
Back issues are available from Innovation (I do not have the address in
front of me)  but I believe #1 of TCOM is already sold out.  The best 
bet is to try a comic convention in one of the misc. bins.  (no offense,
Terry, but most comic shops have not heard of you and are not interested
in much other than standard Marvel and DC superheros)  If you have other
questions or want the address of Innovation, e-mail me.

Matt     mduhan@husc.harvard.edu

**************************************************************************
* Harvard Man/Harvard Man/Going to school in Cambridgeland/              *
* Always wins against Yale Man/Harvard Man/                              *
* Is he a doc/Or is he a jock/Does he just work or does he like to rock/ *
* No one compares to Harvard Man/Intelligent man/Harvard Man             *
*    -They Might Be Giants (sort of)                                     *
**************************************************************************
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: rm104449@ee.tut.fi (M{kinen Riku)
Subject: Erm. Excuse me?
Originator: rm104449@ee.tut.fi
Organization: Tampere University of Technology, Finland
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 92 10:08:40 GMT


I'm no expert on Mr. Pratchett's work (I've read only the DW books from 'The 
color of magic' to 'Eric'). So I'm sorry if I'm wrong but *wasn't* there the
same bit repeated in two different DW books. I mean the bit where someone is
to be tortured, but
i) the tiger is ill
ii) the eternal fire ...um ...should be started first
iii) *but* there is (always) the snake pit (where at least Rincewind found a
hero with woollen underwear...)
I think it was in 'Wyrd sisters' and 'Sourcery'. Question: WHY? 
-- 
   Riku M{kinen                \   "When things are blackest I just say to     
   e-mail: rm104449@ee.tut.fi   \   myself 'Cheer up, things could be worse!'  
   phone: +358 31 183029        /   And sure enough, they get worse." -Skeeve
From: wjs@doc.ic.ac.uk (Bill Sharp)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
Subject: Re: DW setting and typoes
Date: 30 Jul 92 08:09:08 GMT
Organization: Imperial College, London

In article <36199@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> garton@jeeves.ucsd.edu (Simon Garton) writes:
>In article <4132@inca.comlab.ox.ac.uk> gordon@robots.oxford.ac.uk (Gordon Buxton) writes:
>
>In the meantime, where does Azrael (the name) come from ... I
>know I have heard it before.
>
>Toodle-pip, tally-ho and a whip bam boo.
>
>Simon.

I think it's the name of the EvilWizard (Gargamel(sp?)) 's cat in 
The Smurfs. Anyway, it sounds pretty much the same

Bill

-- 
|  _\|/_          He said that there was death and taxes, and taxes was 
| /.\ /.\     worse, because at least death didn't happen to you every year.  
| \_/v\_/
|___\-/_________wjs@doc.ic.ac.uk____Bill_Sharp,_Imperial_College,_London._______
From: gordon@robots.oxford.ac.uk (Gordon Buxton)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
Subject: Re: DW setting and typoes
Date: 30 Jul 92 11:45:11 GMT
Organization: Robotics Research Group, Engineering Science Dept, Oxford, UK.

In article <1992Jul29.162355.10353@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mowen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Guinny) writes:
>
>	On another note, not entirely unrelated, I was wondering if
>there is any particular reason the Discworld books aren't divided
>up into separate chapters?  Is it so that we don't have a convenient
>break in which we can put the book down and so we're forced to read
>the books in one sitting and then have to go out and buy more of them??
>(not that I would *want* to put the book down, but I *do* have other
>things to do, like read news...)
>
>Bye for now...
>
>Guinny


Probably because its sort of written as if it was a screenplay.  Lots
of quick nipping backwards and forwards in the location of the plot,
but not much mucking around with the inexorable march of time.  If you
replaced the short breaks in the text with "Meanwhile ..." it would
still make sense, but wouldn't leave you any time at all during the
reading of a new book in which to go to the loo, for example.

You don't get very many chapter breaks in good films, and you wouldn't
want them neither!  Its all down to demarkation innit? Like we don't
tell Him about the subtle intricacies of dramatic irony, metaphor,
allegory, pun and anti-pun, and He don't do any Pascal programming.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Buxton			|  I'm gonna get this .sig right,    |
gordon@robots.oxford.ac.uk	|  even if it ki *<urgghhh>*
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
From: leo@ph.tn.tudelft.nl (Leo Breebaart)
Subject: Re: Yawn.
Reply-To: leo@ph.tn.tudelft.nl
Organization: Delft University of Technology
Distribution: alt
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 08:47:21 GMT

icklinck@cayley.waterloo.edu (Ian "Rhys" Klinck) writes:

> So, you're not going to post a negative review because the author might 
> read it?

Yup, I call this: politeness.

> a) Would it be better to do it where he won't?

I understand what you're thinking: that it is better to say something negative 
to somebody's face then gossiping behind his back about it. I am not a
hypocrit, and wouldn't mind if Mr. Pratchett got to see any review I might 
write about his books, because it would be my honest opinions, nothing
else.

But it *does* make a difference (to me) that he now is reading this
group. At work I also don't walk up to colleagues and start telling them
they are doing something wrong. Ordinary social politeness prevents me
from doing this, even if I would have no *intrinsic* problems with 
telling them those exact same criticisms under, let's say either more formal, 
or more informal circumstances.

> b) Do you think the author never reads any reviews of his own work from other
> sources (which are, I'm sure, even for Mr. Pratchett, sometimes negative)?

For professional reviewers it's their job, of course, and they are usually
not reviewing to the author's face.

> c) If you write a GOOD review, and point out what you don't like, maybe it'll
> give Mr. Pratchett a chance to avoid such things in his future books

He has already done so. "Witches Abroad" is not one of the best DiscWorld
novels, but "Small Gods" is, definitely. I had no problems writing *that* 
review.

-- 
Leo Breebaart  (leo @ ph.tn.tudelft.nl)
From: gordon@robots.oxford.ac.uk (Gordon Buxton)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.pratchett
Subject: Re: DW setting and typoes
Date: 28 Jul 92 11:50:26 GMT
Organization: Robotics Research Group, Engineering Science Dept, Oxford, UK.

In article <memo.544949@cix.compulink.co.uk> tpratchett@cix.compulink.co.uk writes:
>Go on...tell me more about comic timing...
>
>
>Terry


Oooooooooh, He flamed me, He flamed me ... <swoon>

Gordon ;-)