HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mtl@cs.brown.edu (Ming-Tsung Lu)
Subject: Department of Fine Arts
        
	Does anyone have a list with the ranking for Fine Arts
	or know any good Fine Arts School (for Master's degree)?	
	A friend of mine is trying to fine a good school here.
Organization: Brown Computer Science Dept.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 20:21:02 GMT

	Thanks for your help!

	Ming


Keywords: 

Newsgroups: soc.college,comp.sys.mac.programmer,misc.education
From: potts@itl.itd.umich.edu (Paul Potts)
Subject: Re: Computer Science Programs
Organization: Instructional Technology Laboratory, University of Michigan
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 14:55:36 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.192941.5698@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> wel2@decoy.uucp (25439-lee) writes:
>In article <1992Aug19.200716.5827@src.umd.edu> tedwards@src.umd.edu (Thomas Grant Edwards) writes:
>>	:
>>	:
>>Besides, I have great expectations that any MIT grad should be able
>>to learn C in 1-2 days.
>>
>>-Thomas

C'mon. Writing C is easy - one can learn the syntax pretty quick.
Learning to debug C well takes somewhat longer, when you begin to realize
that even though you are writing in a high-level language, you need to be
concerned about pointers, integer sizes, the subtle differences between
array reference and pointer reference - the low-level semantics of C can
be challenging. If you don't believe me, pop open a copy of Plauger's
"The C Standard Library" and start optimizing the string routines, or
better yet convert them into assembly... :)

>
>A Rutgers man myself, I picked up PL/1 in a day %-)
>	...course I already knew Fortrash and Algol
>
>Winston Lee
>wel2@decoy.cc.bellcore.com


-- 
"It'sVerySad / toSeeTheAncientAndDistinguishedGameThatUsedToBe / aModelOf
DecorumAndTranquilityBecomeLikeAnyOtherSportABattlegroundForRivalIdeologies
toSlugItOutWithGlee." (from _Chess_). -potts@itl.itd.umich.edu-
Newsgroups: soc.college
From: buick@belay (Patrick D. Buick)
Subject: Re: Co-Ed Rooming - Help Request
Organization: Belay Enterprises Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 01:35:22 GMT

In article <1992Aug29.171043.16957@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> garvey@skybridge.SCL.CWRU.Edu (Heather Garvey) writes:
>coyote@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (cats) writes:
>>
>>What can I say?  Purdue's idea of co-ed is having a girl's dorm on
>>one side, a boy's on the other, and a dining room in between.
>>
>>Members of the opposite sex are allowed in your room from
>>10:30 am-12:30 am, on weekend, 10:30 am-2:00 am
>>
>>Personally, I think the whole thing is lame.
>
>	My brother, Tim, is a sophomore at Purdue and he helped 
>move me into CWRU this year, seeing my dorms for the first time.
>He was amazed that we were directly opposite a men's suite and
>that I was living a mere floor above my boyfriend. :) He agrees 
>with your opinion of Purdue 'co-ed' dorms. 
>
>
>--
>	" ...dealing with Free-Net makes me very angry  | Heather "Moose"
>and gives me thoughts of breaking things and torturing  | Garvey, Biochem 93'
>small animals. "   --  Bruce Ikenaga <bxi@po.cwru.edu>  | <hlg@po.cwru.edu>

Fer as I know, we still have segregated floors... and that is as
co-ed as it gets.  Ok, I lie, there are condos that you can get
or sort of mini-apartments... they are fully co-ed as fer as I know..
(Spelling intentional).. :-)
Patrick
-- 
==========================================================
Patrick D. Buick EMT, EET  | Internet: buick%belay@uunet.uu.net
Belay Enterprises Inc.     | Internet: buickp@cuug.ab.ca
Calgary, Alberta, Canada   | UUCP:...!calgary!pixel!belay!buick
Newsgroups: soc.college
From: jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)
Subject: Re: Computer Science Programs
Reply-To: jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 18:58:19 GMT

Kent Sandvik (Hacker) writes
> At least such persons should learn *how to change* the programming world
> to something better. We are stuck in the big mess of ancient languages,
> and there's certainly finally time for something better.

I think it's high time to start teaching objective programming where  
reusability is stressed.  Often programs are not written from scratch but  
built from parts of other programs and objective programming stresses  
this.  Objective programming is also where a lot of programming is headed  
now.
--
-- Jeff (jeffo@uiuc.edu)
-- no NeXTmail please
Newsgroups: soc.college,comp.sys.mac.programmer,misc.education
From: gds@oahu.cs.ucla.edu (Greg Skinner)
Subject: Re: Computer Science Programs
Originator: gds@oahu.cs.ucla.edu
Reply-To: gds@cs.ucla.edu (Greg Skinner)
Organization: too funky
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 23:40:55 GMT

In article <1992Aug18.030000.21291@athena.mit.edu>, solman@athena.mit.edu
(Jason W Solinsky) wrote:
> He refers to my point that an MIT major in 18C (Theoretical Computer Science)
> need only learn scheme and that a 6-3 person need only learn Scheme and CLU
> (A C-like language). He believes that this is bad because as a result, MIT
> 6-3 graduates won't be well prepared to work in the "real world" :-) :-) :-)

Hmmm.  I never thought of CLU as being a C-like language.  Unless they
changed it considerably, it's not much like C at all.  It is
strongly typed; allows you to "overload" operators; supports (at the
language level) data abstraction, user-defined data types, etc.

However, I learned how to program in other languages from summer jobs,
my thesis project, and just hacking around.  A lot of 6-3 graduates I
knew did a lot of stuff on the side, and didn't restrict their
learning to the classroom.

One thing I found different (and to my liking) between undergrad
cs education at UCLA and at MIT was that the undergrad cs classes here
were taught more straightforwardly.  For example, the scheme class and
the AI classes at MIT presented the material as if it were "magic" and
you had to think like a "wizard" to understand it.  Comparable classes
at UCLA were taught more as a set of principles that one applied to
solve certain problems.  Of course, when I was going to MIT (early
80's), the scheme and AI courses were going through a period of
evolution.  The scheme class had no text; rather, it had notes that
eventually became the text that is used (_Structure and Interpretation
of Computer Programs_, I believe).  I also think some MIT professors
get a kick out of presenting cs in a somewhat mysterious way; one
professor liked to dress up as a wizard and wave a wand during
lectures. :-)

By the way, someone at MIT wrote their undergrad thesis on the style
of teaching the scheme class; if anyone knows where I can get a copy
of the thesis I'd appreciate it.

--gregbo

Newsgroups: soc.college,comp.sys.mac.programmer,misc.education
From: Fil Sapienza <Fil.Sapienza@med.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Computer Science Programs
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 12:39:21 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan - Surgery Tech Svc
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1

Subject: Re: Computer Science Programs
From: Sandeep Cariapa, cariapa@Tied-House.Stanford.EDU
In article <1992Aug27.213943.2065@EE.Stanford.EDU> Sandeep Cariapa,
cariapa@Tied-House.Stanford.EDU writes:
>In article <1992Aug27.192941.5698@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>,
wel2@decoy.uucp 
>(25439-lee) writes:
>|> >Besides, I have great expectations that any MIT grad should be able
>|> >to learn C in 1-2 days.
>|> >
>|> A Rutgers man myself, I picked up PL/1 in a day %-)
>|> 	...course I already knew Fortrash and Algol
>|> 
>
>		One day?! Geez, I took just one hour! What did they teach you guys
>at Rutgers?
>
>
Oh yeah? Well I picked up implementing Fourier transformations in
C++ in 3 minutes -- so there!
Newsgroups: soc.college
From: spencer@physics.ucla.edu (Spencer)
Subject: Looking for someone at Tufts
Organization: UCLA Department of Physics
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 92 21:23:26 GMT

Is there anyone out there from Tufts University?

I am trying to contact a friend in Medical school there.

Thanks,
Matt Spencer

replies by email: spencer@physics.ucla.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: walter (Walter Lego)
Subject: Re: Desperation (was Re: Commitment--The C-word?)
Followup-To: soc.singles
Reply-To: nobody
Organization: Twisted Pair Inc.
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 17:17:09 GMT

In article <5028@news.duke.edu> diamond@acpub.duke.edu (Elizabeth Abrams) writes:
>Darn it, will you all stop talking about food?  I'm hungry and broke.
>Fresh tomatoes... sigh.  Anybody in the Durham area know of a good place
>for pizza and wings?  If so, wanna go out for some?  Or Chinese food?

Hmm... "Hungry, broke female looking for a dinner companion". Not quite the
same ring. It is all in the phrasing, I guess.

>But doesn't *total* self-sufficiency imply no need for another person?  I'm
>pretty self-sufficient, but not *totally* so.  People who are utter and
>absolute islands ususally don't have much time or interest to spare.
>I want someone mostly self-sufficient, but still human enough to need
>the occasional backrub, cuddle, etc.  (I don't want to be someone's mom,
>but I also don't want to be someone's scenery; nice to have around, but
>not particularly important).

You must differentiate the self-sufficiency while initiating mating rituals
from self-sufficiency after successful mating. Seems like reasonable neediness
is tolerated and encouraged at the latter stage while discouraged at the
former stage. I think single men and women are victims of their own rules.

						Walter

What disclaimer?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: walter (Walter Lego)
Subject: Re: Finding Romantic Partners (on the net)
Followup-To: soc.singles
Reply-To: nobody
Organization: Twisted Pair Inc.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 15:29:28 GMT

In article <1992Aug26.110643.6071@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> allisson@turing.toronto.edu (H. Allisson Roome) writes:
>Umm .. how could I do that?  I never knew friends got jealous over their
>friends liasons ... besides, I know where my heart is and it's not NYC.

At which point, thousands of lonely guys (not from NYC) fall out of their chair
wondering "Could it be....". Their little hearts go out of synch with their
breathing that had stopped momentarily until it gradually dawns on them that
she doesn't know they even exist and kick themselves for having just lurked 
all this time.

						Walter

What disclaimer?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: zagar@chester.cms.udel.edu (Randy Zagar)
Subject: Re: The Chocolate Urgies
Reply-To: zagar@chester.cms.udel.edu
Organization: Marine Studies, University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 20:04:50 GMT

In article 4057@moscom.UUCP, wjb@moscom.UUCP (Bill de Beaubien) writes:
>Randy Zagar (zagar@chester.cms.udel.edu) wrote:
>: It is known that consuming chocolate causes the brain to produce certain
>: chemicals that are also produced (naturally) when a person is 'in love'.
>: (the romantic/erotic kind :-)
>: 
>: Is it any wonder, then, that chocolate is the gift of choice on valentines' day ?
>
>Hmm...  Are there any interesting correlations involving allergies to chocolate?


I, sure as hades, HOPE NOT !

Unless, of course, they're *reelly* interesting... :-)

-Randy

--------------------------------------------------------
>Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com 



---
 _____________________________________________________________________________
/                                                                             \
| Randy Zagar                            Get your priorities straight.        |
| Internet: zagar@Chester.CMS.UDel.Edu   No one on their death bed ever said  |
| Bell-net: 302/831-1139                 "Gee, if I'd only spent more time    |
|                                        at the office..."                    |
\_____________________________________________________________________________/
From: chinj@acfcluster.nyu.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Please Help Me!
Date: 29 Aug 92 23:27:29 GMT
Organization: New York University

Hello!

I hope nobody minds me poping in like this.  I just turn
single.  Right now I'm in a very depressed state of mind.
A friend of mine told me about this newsgroup and said
I could meet some interesting live people here that are
nice and careing.  So, I figure I give it a try and perhaps
it could ease my mind.

So, if anyone out there wants to share their thoughts 
E-mail me at ChinJ@acfcluster.nyu.edu

Thanks!
John Chin

-sml  
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: wtr@mitre.org (Bill Ralston)
Subject: Re: Finding Romantic Partners (long)
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 22:36:14 GMT

in article <ewillims.714843551@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma 
Williams) writes:

[previous thread history deleted]

>        Weird as it sounds, chocolate sauce on meat is an original use
>for chocolate. The Aztecs used to use it as a sauce and regarded it as
>delicacy. That's what I call chocoholism.....my kind of people! (*GRIN*)

It's called Mole sauce and it is *good*.  There's a southern mexican style 
restaurant here (Boston) that serves dishes with that and other 
Aztec-style dishes that is really good (perhaps an excuse in itself for a 
Boston-Boink).  In addition, the Mole sauce has seemed to have an 
aphrodisiac effect on the ladies I've taken there. Heh heh heh...

Bill
---------------
wtr@mitre.org
** Opinions are mine only, and not my employer's (no kidding, really)**
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing)
Subject: Re: Can we can the suck-up bit?
Keywords: encourage friendship?
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 15:40:37 GMT

In article <kiran.715316945@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>>Some men actually like to do nice things for people (even if they happen
>>to be female) because they get enjoyment from doing nice things for people.
>
>And some people misinterpret being helpful as attempting to control.
>Guess the easy solution is to stop being helpful.

Right!  There you go!  See?  Just what I was talking about earlier.  That
is the very same reason men quit opening doors or letting women out of
elevators first or all those other polite things.  A few bad apples - of
the feminist type - snarled once too often "I can do it *myself*!" and now
there's a whole generation of men afraid to open a door for fear they're
going to get smacked!  I'm with John - every helpful action is not a
political statement, nor an opportunity to manipulate.

Angelwing -  I do draw the line at dropping hankies.

*------------------------------------------------------------------*
* Angelwing       |  "And just where do you think you're going     *
* U. of Washington|   dressed like *that*?                         *
*                 |                            -  My Dad           *
*------------------------------------------------------------------*



Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: fredw@mks.com (Fred Walter)
Subject: Can you accept criticism ? (was Re: Why lurkers lurk ...)
Organization: Mortice Kern Systems Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 20:01:46 GMT

ross@zooid.guild.org (Ross Ridge) writes:
>You know, Fred, that reminds me of something one of your ex-roomates
>once told me about you...

Well, geez, don't keep me (and 90000 of my fans :-) in suspense ...

This reminds me of something else - who can take criticism (constructive
criticism that is) without getting upset ? An even better question, how
does one give constructive criticism without it coming across as a
personal attack ?

	fred
-- 
Disclaimer: everything I write is my *personal* opinion and does not represent
or reflect the opinion of the company which employs me.
From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: DEFORMITIES AND PERVE
Date: 25 Aug 92 16:54:34 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: QQQCLC

>In article <71601@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>Assuming that one overgeneralized sociobiological theory deserves another:
>I've read that men's sexual orientations/preferences are in general more
>rigid than women's. What do you guys say? Do you have a single "type
>preference" that has existed unchanged since your first sexual experience?

	Yeah.

	Women.

						Kayembee
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Opinion/insight- becoming friends with an 'ex'
Date: 30 Aug 92 05:26:41 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <29AUG92.00181817@vax.clarku.edu> mcohen@vax.clarku.edu writes:

>Anyone out there been through a similar situation?  I'd be particularly
>interested in the point of view of one who did NOT want to be approached by an
>"ex", to get a better point of view on what she might be going through.

It sucks, but you've tried as you felt you had to, and she's choosing to
be obnoxious.  (Rejecting a friend of an old flame?  Criminy!).  I think
any action will have to come from her court at this point.  Until she
gets herself a little more peaceable about what happened, you're unlikely
to have much of a chance to fix things.

And you can be assured I know about how hard that is.  I wish I had some
advice that had an active role for you, but I don't.  I think you have to
let this play out on someone else's timeframe, or let it go.

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Across the evening sky, all the birds are leaving
But how can they know it's time for them to go?		- Sandy Denny
Xref: sparky soc.singles:23702 talk.bizarre:27624
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.bizarre
Subject: Useful Advise on dating a friend
Date: 27 Aug 92 14:10:17 GMT
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper



Be careful when preparing them for sampling.


ciao
drieux

ps: well someone had to say it....



-- 
If I have Told You Once, I've Told You a Thousand Times:
To Keep Good Girls From Going Badm
Put them back in the Refrigerator.
This Also Works for Stale NFS Handles.
From: greg@netcom.com (Greg Bullough)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Can you accept criticism ? (was Re: Why lurkers lurk ...)
Date: 4 Sep 92 19:23:08 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

Just what the hell do you mean by THAT question????
 
:-)
 
Greg
From: pw@panix.com (Paul Wallich)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Finding Romantic Partners (on the net)
Date: 28 Aug 92 16:42:26 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Trivializers R Us

In article <BtoAoI.409@acsu.buffalo.edu> swann@acsu.buffalo.edu (Stephen Swann) writes:
>Nah, she never even mentioned how she Just Wasn't Ready For Commitment
>(except to somebody else, who she's already selected), which is a 
>really critical part of the formal LJBF ritual.  ;-)

Ah. That makes me feel much better. Unless ... Uh, Allisson, are you
ready for commitment (the shorter-sleeved kind, that is) ?

>>paul     ask me about columbus, i dare ya
>What's this about Columbus, Paul?

Columbus? What Columbus? You mean the geographically illiterate simp
largely invented by Washington Irving to help make an unperson of
Sebastian Cabot during the days when England wasn't PC? Don't know
anything about him.

paul     Oh, you meant the street with the trendy wannabee stores. sorry.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org>
Subject: Re: Mea Culpa
Organization: ZOOiD BBS
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 23:39:13 GMT
Keywords: cynical net.veterans

Regrettably, I wrote:
>In my humble opinion, the most interesting posts come from stef@apple.com.
>She's thoughtful, articulate, and witty--a clear, strong signal in a
>cacophony of noise.

aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius) responded:
>9.1 on the Suckup Scale.

Kiran Wagel chimed in:
>No, Aahz, this is an easy ten.  You better recalibrate your SuckUpMeter.

enigma@halcyon.com (Matt Luders) writes:
>No good deed goes unpunished.  Apparently, I haven't been reading this
>newsgroup long enough to know that you must never, *ever* compliment a
>member of the opposite sex.  My humblest apologies.  It won't happen again.

Aahz and Kiran were merely complimenting you for your suckup, it certainly
was one of the best seen here in a while.  I don't see how you could
consider this punishment, it seemed very sincere to me.

							Ross Ridge

-- 
Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU					     l/	 //
								    [OO][oo]
ross@zooid.guild.org						    /()\/()/
uunet.ca!zooid!ross						     db	 //
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Subject: The Dawn of Suckups (Was: Re: Bananas)
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 12:59:14 GMT

In article <kiran.715078940@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>Is is sucking up if it happens to be the truth?
>
>For example, if I suggested that someone was lovely and talented, and
>cute, and PERKY even, and it were true, would I be sucking up?

Might you be referring to a Miz Hardin by any chance there??

The best way to do a suckup big time is to ask around, find out the person's
real address or work address and then send them a bouquet or some other
suprise.

Yes!  Ho. Ho.  Yes!  You too can be a recipient of a major suckup.  Just check
for my name on the package.  One of YOU, will receive a delivery in the mail
before the end of the month.  Yes!  Ho. Ho.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston)
Subject: Re: Commitment--The C-word?
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 11:29:31 GMT

In article <1992Aug24.212416.4644@odin.corp.sgi.com> lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford) writes:
>Most of the attempted rescuing I get is from older guys, who really just
>can't believe that a woman can exist alone.  ...

> ...  I will admit, though, that I wasn't brought up to be this
>self-sufficient.  I was raised a product of the '50s, with the dream that
>someday my prince would come.

These older guys were, of course, brought up to be a prince only to find that
there had been a revolution and the monarchy had been abolished.  However,
they're headed for extinction, so the problem will solve itself.

-- Herb Huston
From: pw@panix.com (Paul Wallich)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Bananas
Date: 25 Aug 92 19:21:11 GMT
Organization: Trivializers R Us

In article <1992Aug25.151539.16737@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>In article <1992Aug25.023900.10539@panix.com> pw@panix.com (Paul Wallich) writes:
>>
>>Jealous, Max?
>>
>Eh? of what?
>
You were asking for banana-peeling details (we already know
what happened next) in a tone that sounded just a mite competitive.

Of course, on rethinking the situation, I've realized that such
a kind, gentle, tolerant person as Max would never be jealous.
Nevermind.

paul
From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Lurkers...
Date: 28 Aug 92 19:30:11 GMT
Organization: QQQCLC

In article <4046@moscom.UUCP> wjb@moscom.UUCP (Bill de Beaubien) writes:
>Some people consider flaming
>people who are obnoxiuos and a boor entertaining.  Of course, others prefer
>to think of it as high art. 

	And some of us consider it a public service.

						Kayembee
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: Commitment--The C-word?
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 13:50:49 GMT

In article <14303@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <1992Aug26.135607.11981@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>>I edit james' post to be totally unrelated to his original idea:
>>> Lets go get stinking drunk on tequila. ...
> 
>Getting stinking drunk on tequila is an original idea?  A good one maybe, but..

No John.  Read the first two lines again, OK?  


-Nance
Chicago Tribune, August 27th, DuPage County section, Page 6, last four
paragraphs.  Read it!!!  :-)
-- 
Nance Colucci  *^*^*^*^*^*    o__    *^*^*^*^*  |  Work that body!
att!ihlpk!colucci            _.>/               | Stay fit for life.
                            (_) \(_)                           
Newsgroups: soc.singles