From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Steve vs. Patrick
Summary: Talk about one-sided...at least I'm here.
Organization: Evil Geniuses for a Better Farm, New Effington, S.D. 57255
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 14:49:55 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.211442.10398@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>In article <Bv6wHK.FnG@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick "'f' Key
Fanatic" L. Humphrey) writes:
>>In article <vyfzky@rpi.edu> cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:
>>>kwelch@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Kevin) writes:
>>>
>>>>Patrick:  I think you know that what you have done and should apologize
>>>>i  to Chaney.  If you wish to continue to fight, please do so
>>>>i  over the mail.
>>>
>>>Well, I've watched this rage for weeks now, and I admit to being
>>>stumped by one thing.
>>>
>>>Why do people continue to think that it's ANY OF THEIR DAMN BUSINESS
>>>whether Patrick apologizes to ChaHallney or not?
>
>GOOD.
>
>Then why don't I just refer to you, Rockbitus, as one of the militant
>bra-burning feminazi's I probably saw turned homeless when one of your
>burning bras caught fire on your curtain and consumed your environmentally
>correct, flower-mural-painted house, and never apologize for it?

Thanks for doing it.  We appreciate you giving us such a clear picture of
where you're coming from.  It makes it so much easier to avoid that place.

>It's no one's business whether or not I ever apologize to you for that.
>Largely because that's the way life is with headbangers like you.

Mind reading again?  Shades of Rasmussen...

>>Needless to say, that's a question *I've* tried to figure out for the last
>>seven weeks or so, myself. :-)
>
>You've been trying to figure out where you're head's at for decades. What
>else is new?

Well, you could be different and say something original, for once...

>>>Patrick has already made a general apology to anyone else on this
>>>group he may have offended.  That's it, folks.  The only apology
>>>that matters to you has been given.  You have NO FURTHER INTEREST
>>>in any Patrick apology.
>>
>>Thank you, Cathi.  I was hoping someone would stand up and put forth their
>>view in plain English.  I don't think DennisSteve, or Nyikos, or Conrat will
>>be able to understand it, but they'll have to wrestle with that problem
>>themselves.
>
>YOU OWE AN APOLOGY TO THE PERSON YOU CALLED FAT BLACK ASS, YOU PIECE OF
>REDNECK NEO-NAZI SHIT, PATRICKKK.

Ahem.  Chill, child.  I didn't call you that, you know it -- and I say you
don't deserve an apology.  You had your chance, and in typical Steve Chaney
fashion, you threw it away.  End of story.

(Of course, if you *really* wanted that apology, you know how to get it.)

>You aren't MAN enough to give me the apology you owe me. You are the most
>twisted, stupid, lying piece of neo-Nazi Texas Snot Beetle's shit that has
>ever walked the face of this earth.

I already know your opinion.  Wake me up when you have something to say...

>>A beautiful summation of it -- though I'd be tempted to say, in the cases of
>>Peter and Suzanne, that they're going after those brown-nose points...:-)
>
>PatricKKK, you are a consummate liar, a coward and a major bigot. I really
>want more than ever to one day tell you to your face that I will do
>whatever it takes to make sure you never, EVER get a chance to use your
>diabetes to justify killing unborn children for parts. I want to say it to
>your face because I want to see just how big, bad and redneck bold you are,

Sure you do, Steve -- I don't have to worry about it, because it'll never
happen.  You don't have the balls of a gnat.  If, by some unfathomable
occurrence, you DID show up, I'd sit there and listen to your raving -- and
then laugh in your little baby face and shut the door on you.  (and then
call 222-3131, of course...I *like* the neighborhood I live in.)

>when you respond, and I want to watch you hear me, then turn around and
>walk away with your head hanging low like the low-life mongrel's shit that
>you are. Tell your wife I said tough shit to her. After you tell her how
>you wished I was in her position.

I told her that about an hour after I posted it -- and she agrees with me.
(It's not my fault if she has more common sense than you do.)  

>PatricKKK, you need help. You lie, deny that you lied, then add more lies.
>Then you can't own up to it to the person you lied on. AND THEN you make a
>racist remark, and you won't apologize to the person you made it to.

Wow.  You actually got something almost right in that whole paragraph --
namely, I made a racist remark.  The law of probability still works. :-)

(The rest of it is just your projecting your flaws on everyone else...isn't
it a curious coincidence that we've seen evidence of you doing everything in
this newsgroup that you're accusing me of doing?)

>Are you really a pro-lifer trying to hurt the pro-choice cause? Are you
>Scott Provost reincarnated? Maybe a 4 year old is using your terminal when
>you're not there.

This is pretty hilarious, coming from someone who can't even get his
multiple personas straight -- and then tries to insinuate that he's Larry
Margolis, to boot.  That's why I'm such a fan of yours, Steve -- as long as
you're around, none of us will be wanting for laughs.  Keep up the good
work.  :-)

>Someone is missing a bunch of their marbles there, and whoever it is, needs
>help.

Indeed -- but I don't think I can call 911 in Sacramento from here to get
you that help.  Yer on yer own, son...:-)


-- 
Newsgroups: talk.abortion