HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sjc@cs.purdue.EDU (Steve Chapin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Virginia Football
Date: 2 Oct 92 13:40:05 GMT
	<19824@ector.cs.purdue.edu> <69710@hydra.gatech.EDU>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University

}} In article <69710@hydra.gatech.EDU> mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:
}} 
}} sjc@cs.purdue.EDU (Steve Chapin) wrote:
}} }
}} }Um, isn't 48-0 a little late to avoid running up the score?
}} }
}} }"Gosh, Coach, they're within 7 touchdowns!  I don't think we should
}} }put the backups in yet!"
}} 
}} In defense of George Welsh, it was only the 2nd game of the season,
}} and Goodman had had trouble in the first game.  I'm all for sportsmanship,
}} but the coach also has a responsibility to get his starters some
}} game experience early in the year.

Aw, Mark, you take all the fun out of life.  Why cloud the issue with
facts?

sjc@cs.purdue.edu               Steve Chapin           Today's Grammar Lesson:
                    ect. is meaningless; etc. == et cetera

                      Beef:  Real food for a dead planet.
From: exurlsr@exu.ericsson.se (Bobby Lightfood)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Wisconsin at Iowa
Date: 6 Oct 92 13:57:21 GMT
Reply-To: exurlsr@exu.ericsson.se
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Richardson TX
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson in North America.
              The opinions expressed are strictly those of the user and
              not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article 507@news.weeg.uiowa.edu, tshannon@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (Timothy J. Shannon) writes:
> From article <1992Oct5.173235.3614@doug.cae.wisc.edu>, by tsau@cae.wisc.edu (Johne Tsau):

> 	I really think if Iowa wants to have any bowl births they have to
> start to win, and that incudes a win over the Badgers.  It will be tough,
> unless Hartlieb plays to his potential, instead of like he did the first 
> half against Michigan.  I think that the only way Wisconsin will win is
> if Iowa makes key mistakes, and Iowa's offense sucks still.  It will be
> to close, last year Iowa barely won.  (7-0 I think)

Not only do they need to start winning, but they certainly need to stop
losing.  Granted their losses were to top 20 teams, they were blown out
of 3 of them.  I don't think the committees will let a 6-5 Hawkeye team
in this year.  If they can't beat Wisconsin, its over.

Go Aggies!!
From: pol30546@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Peder Larsen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Next Week's Polls
Date: 30 Sep 92 00:39:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.BvD8Hx.HvJ
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana


	I've been reading a lot of stories about how people are
happy that Washington is now #1 in polls, but is everyone so sure
that they won't be #2 again next week?  I think that if Miami can
prove itself by beating Florida State convincingly, they will be
back to #1 in most of the minds of the voters who just switched.
On the other hand, if Florida State wins big, they could also be
vaulted to #1.

	If you think about it, it does make sense.  This is the biggest
game of the year so far, a game that will test how good both teams
really are.  Washington hasn't had such a test yet and thus hasn't really
proven their quality.  Their best game will probably be their last one,
in whichever bowl they end up in.  In the end, Miami or Florida State
beating another top 3 team means a lot more than Washington beating
Nebraska in a less than inspiring game.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado)
Subject: Re: Bobby.Bowden.sucks.sucks.sucks
Keywords: next year...
Organization: Florida State University Computing Center
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 92 22:18:19 GMT



AAAAAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!!!.  That damn phrase again! I have been living in
Tallahassee for...shit...a decade or so (off and on...moved a few times, but
always managed to get back to this hell hole somehow)...and all I have ever
heard is, "maybe next year...yeah, we'll win it all next year". I first
heard this phrase after FSU lost the orange bowl after the '79 season. I have
heard nothing else since. Of course, noone here in good old Tally would dare
say a harsh word against Bobby. Ya see, he is of the old "southern gentleman"
mold...and people of the south have a hard time knocking a guy who is so damn
friendly, honest, and philanthropic as Bowden...even if he is a loser. I, on
the other hand, was born and raised in the North (NY) and have no such 
problem with ragging on him...in fact, I rather enjoy it. It's not like there
is anything else to do here in Tallahassee...not like celebrating a national
championship or anything liek that...no.
From: v262xxve@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Timothy C Pitts)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami routs Arizona
Date: 5 Oct 92 15:46:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: acsu.Bvnnts.3GB
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Oct3.000009.19596@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>, swanson@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Bob Swanson) writes...
#How many of the blowouts went FSU's way?

1963, 24-0
1970, 27-3
1972, 37-14
1979, 40-23 *
1982, 24-7
1984, 38-3

All but (*) were in Miami.  Also note that only 12 of the 36 games have
been played in Tallahassee.

#  What happens if you define `blowout'
#to be 20 points or more?

Then the number of blowouts drops to ten.

___

Timothy C. Pitts             
Canada US Trade Center
Department of Geography
University at Buffalo        
V262XXVE@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu
From: crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Wisconsin at Iowa
Date: 6 Oct 92 17:22:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Oct6.172205.26456
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

tsau@cae.wisc.edu (Johne Tsau) writes:
>Am I the only one who feels that Wisconsin at Iowa this week will be
>tougher than Ohio at Wisconsin?  Wisconsin has a history of playing
>OSU hard, but when was the last time UW beat Iowa at home?  Iowa
>is hungry for a win now (if not hungry for some confidence back), and
>Iowa is not as bad as their record shows.  Afterall, all of their losses
>were to Top-20 teams I believe...
>
>Wisconsin will have to play no mistake football I think to win in Iowa
>City.  Eliminate the penalties, make smart passes, and don't make
>turnovers.  

I think it is critical if Wisconsin wants to show that they are for real and
that the OSU thing wasn't just a fluke.  Iowa still has a lot of respect
and name recognition, even if they don't have the record to justify it
this year.  I certainly think Wisconsin can beat Iowa, and won't be at all
surprised if they do it.  If the Badgers win, they will have taken a major
step towards the bowls.  By the way, the Badgers only loss was to the #1 
team in the nation--the Top 20 losses thing works both ways.  Looking at
their schedule, there isn't a team left that they shouldn't be extremely
competitive with, although they will probably be underdogs at Indiana
(remember, they don't play Michigan this year).  The Badgers have a very
realistic shot at going 9-2 or 8-3 and finishing second or third in the
Big Ten.  They even have a long shot at going to the Rose Bowl, although
this would require a 10-1 record and OSU (or somebody else) to beat
Michigan.  Still, it is possible (at least in theory...)

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
University of Washington      *   water again!
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn)
Subject: Prediction Wrap-Up - Week #4
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 11:33:19 GMT

     Unfortunately [???], I didn't have a lot of time to write up snappy banter
and think up new awards, which is what I wanted to do. Starting school and a
new relationship in the same week can be hell on those dumb enough to risk it.
:-) Again, if there are any mistakes, e-mail to me and lemme kneaux.
     Congrats to Jay Boisseau, Randy Peppler, and Tim Pitts, all of whom went 
undefeated this week (though I'm sure Tim was sweating out that Miami game!) 
Also, Mark Mitchell only missed one -- the Colorado State-LSU game -- and even 
in that one he managed to pick the correct score for CSU (17 pts.). If LSU
had just managed to score another 31... :-)

Jay Boisseau (SWC)                        5-  0-  0  (1.000)
  (boisseau@chpc.utexas.edu)             13-  3-  1  ( .794)

Charlie Cockrell (SEC)                    4-  1-  0  ( .800)
                                         20-  2-  0  ( .909)

Scott Davis (Big 8)                       4-  3-  0  ( .571)
  (scott@mccall.com)                     17-  4-  0  ( .810)

Pat Fleming (MAC)                         3-  2-  0  ( .600)
  (pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)   18- 10-  0  ( .643)

Mark Mitchell (SEC)                       6-  1-  0  ( .857)
  (mm42@prism.gatech.EDU)                30-  6-  0  ( .833)

*Randy Peppler (Big Ten/11)               8-  0-  0  (1.000)
  (peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu)             15-  3-  0  ( .833)

Tim Pitts (Big East)                      6-  0-  0  (1.000)
                                         21-  3-  1  ( .860)

Cliff Slaughterbeck (Pac-10)              7-  1-  0  ( .875)
  (crs@milton.u-washington.edu)          11-  3-  1  ( .767)

Goober Smith (SWC)                        4-  1-  0  ( .800)
                                         11-  5-  1  ( .676)

------------------------------------------------------------------

Bapi Gupta (national)                    26-  7-  0  ( .788)
  (c31801ag@wuvmd.wustl.edu)             65- 28-  1  ( .697)

Darryl Marsee (national)                 28- 14-  0  ( .667)
  (demarsee@rodan.acs.syr.edu)           77- 40-  4  ( .653)

# Kevin Schmidt (national)                0-  0-  0
  (schmke@cco.caltech.edu)               93- 36-  5  ( .713)


# -- Will post results later

                              Cheers!

                                 Steve
|
-- 
    Steve Casburn (scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)
    *The* Ohio State University
    When I was growing up, Cal and Kansas were competitive programs. They
      still are. But it's not quite the same... :-)
From: gregb@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Greg Begay)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 14:34:38 GMT
Subject: Re: Oklahoma question - IS GIBBS A DEAD MAN?
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college


>What I heard in Norman was that the regents and the univ. pres. don't care if
>OU goes 8-4 as long as the program is clean.  But my gut feeling is we *have*
>to beat the cows or that may be it.  Losing to NU or CU would be no disgrace,
>they probably have stronger teams this year.  When we  were put on probation,
>it was well known that this season would be seriously affected.
 
The regents may not care, but I doubt they could hold up against alumni
and other University supporters.

>To me Gibbs does has done a fine job cleaning up the program and preparing
>the team, but his on-field coaching during the game is more than a little sus-
>pect.  I'm  guessing  that if he beats t.u. (and KU) he'll be around for sure
>next year.  If not, who really knows?

I agree.  Gibbs has done a *great* job keeping OU off field activities
out of the newspaper.  I mildly disagree that OU has been adequately
prepared for it's games.

>Why did he sit on the ball against USC?  I don't think he did!  Our offensive
>line just wasn't moving their defensive line.  The playcalling got too 
>predictable, but still, we couldn't get any kind of surge.  If we can't
>convert the 4th & 1, we can't win.  BTW, our D played great.  Only one bad
>play: the busted coverage on Conway for the 51yd strike.

The great passing offense looked really limited against USC.  The only 
pass OU seemed to have was the "quick out".  The play calling was very 
questionable.  USC was obviously bringing their front line to attack 
Gundy.  OU ran one reverse that, I thought, gained decent yardage.  Why 
did they not run it (or similiar, eg, screens) agian?

OU has appeared, to me at least, to not be adequately prepared for some
big games (Texas, Colorado, Neb., this last USC).  They were unable to 
adjust to what the opponent was doing.  Also, the players did not seem 
to be "ready" to play.  Gundy had a bad day against USC, the recievers 
did not hold onto the ball, etc.  Switzer was a master at having his team
ready to play for big games.


>    OOOO          
>   O    O     =================================== |   Bill Dostalik
>   O  U O  U          Oklahoma Sooners            |                
>   O  U O  U  National College Football Champions |  dostalik@utdallas.edu
>    OOOO   U     1950 1955 1956 1974 1975 1985    |  
>      U    U  =================================== |  "Oh, yeah?"  "Yeah." 
>       UUUU                                       | 

I *really* like this .sig Bill!

>----------

GO SOONERS!

GregB
Newsgroups: osu.sports,rec.sport.football.college
From: betz@gozer.idbsu.edu (Andrew Betz)
Subject: Re: Well, well, well
Organization: SigSauer Fan Club  
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 23:01:22 GMT

In article <1992Oct3.202424.11732@ee.eng.ohio-state.edu> jingyao@rainier.eng.ohio-state.edu (Jinyao Liu) writes:
>    So the Bucks lost. We don't belong to the top 10 or 20 anyway.  It 
>doesn't seem to be Cooper's year (again *-).

Top 10, not after that game.  Top 20?  Maybe.

>    One thing I don't understand is, with more than 4 minutes time, less than
>40 yards to go, shouldn't we consider some running plays instead of all 
>shot gun ?  It's plenty of time , it's 4 down situation and it's 4 point
>game, it should be the perfect time for running plays.  Don't they coaches
>even use their brains ?   

Valid questions.  I'm beginning to believe that Earle Bruce ushered
in an era where Wisconsin will play only one inspired game a year,
always against Ohio State, and will play just good enough to beat
TOSU.  Interesting to see Cooper continuing the tradition.

>    But even if the Bucks had scored another touchdown, I would have lost
>my money anyway.   

Egads, money, schmoney.  I publically predicted TOSU 28, Wisconsin 10.

>     Well, well, well...

Drew 
--
betz@gozer.idbsu.edu
*** brought into your terminal from the free state of idaho ***
From: mcguire@cs.tamu.edu (Tim McGuire)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: FTAB Military Action (was Re: Aggie Riot)
Date: 29 Sep 92 15:56:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: tamsun.1992Sep29.155646.28763
Organization: Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University

In article <1992Sep28.160354.24637@menudo.uh.edu> HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.) writes:
>In <15695@borg.cs.unc.edu> crittend@bodie.cs.unc.edu writes:
Hi Brad!
>> swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:
>>>tomscud@ruf.rice.edu (Thomas Reid Scudder) writes:
>>>>BTW--the Stanford band may have gotten booed by a whole crowd, but have they
>>>>ever managed to be the targets of a riot?  Then again, antagonizing an Aggie
>>>>crowd on a day when the Aggies lose is a bad idea. (Of course,the Aggie riot
>>>>is also ancient history...the MOB hasn't done anything nearly as interesting
>>>>in ages...)
>> here's what i've heard:  aggies at rice in the mid to late 70's.  MOB
>> comes out and imitates the Fightin' Texas Aggie Band.  now while
>> aggies as a rule have a wonderful sense of humor this mockery was too
>> much for the aggie band and the corps of cadets to take.  
>  I think there was some goose-stepping involved.  What *did* the MOB do to 
>bring out such an extreme reaction (not that I think threats of violence were
>deserved)?
>  Was this the same game as the "doggie incident" or a completely separate 
>occurence? 
>Jammer Jim Miller 
>Texas A&M University '89 and '91

If I'm not mistaken, the "riot" was sparked by their send-up of
"Miss Revielle, Ma'am" (They announce a tribute to Revielle, and 
form a fire hydrant.)  Unfortunately, since Revielle (III?) had 
just died (with military burial), the Ags didn't have much
humor about it.  I don't think that the MOB was rounded up, just 
afraid to come out of hiding.

The MOB is finally welcome again at Kyle Field.  

Tim McGuire
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ssj@ais.org (Stephen S. Johnston)
Subject: Re: FSU-Miami-ND
Organization: UMCC
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 18:39:47 GMT

In article <92276.214716MXD118@psuvm.psu.edu> Spiro the Spiny Goldfish <MXD118@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>In article <1992Oct3.012543.19217@news.nd.edu>, rszczerb@tolkien.helios.nd.edu
>(Robert Szczerba) says:
>>
>>Well ... the AP polls treated the ND-Mich game as a tie for
>>Michigan and a loss for the Irish ... I don't think that's too
>>fair.  But, judging from the recent net posts, there seems to
>>be a lot of anit-ND sentiment out there.
>
>As they should have. Michigan, after all, didn't play for the tie.
>----
>Mike Dahmus       MXD118@PSUVM  or  dahmus@cs.psu.edu
>TEAM OS/2

Well, ND did sit on the ball (Holtz's decision/ignorance has already 
been discussed at length), it was a home game for ND and it was 
their second game of the season (after pounding a hapless Northwestern).  
The tie was Michigan's first game.  As I recall, Michigan was 6 and 
ND 7 in at least one of polls taken after the game. 

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: bill@gaza.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (William J. King)
Subject: Hawaii ranking
Organization: University of Hawaii
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 17:30:16 GMT



The New York Times ranked HAWAII #7 in college FootBall.  But then,
what does the Times know of football.   :-)

UH has a bye this week; then on to Utah Oct 10th.

Wm.


--
    bill@uhunix.bitnet 
    bill@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu 
    21.19 N.LAT by 157.52 W.LONG          
    Fish on the Byte
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: sschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Susan E Schudt)
Subject: Re: Miami - ND (once again)
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 00:06:54 GMT


In article <5575@news.duke.edu> ds4@soc11.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS
) writes:
>
>Hmmmm...Karl, at least the 'evil' Miami fans never rushed onto the field to
>attack the Miami players....'88 was it.  Plus what about that time all the
>oranges in the area around Notre Dame were bought so they could throw them at
the
>Miami players.  They started to, and would not have stopped if it was not for
the
>referies penelizing Notre Dame for the fans actions.


Amazing.  Truly amazing.

Don't flatter yourself.  We didn't rush on the field to attack the Miami 
players.  Ever heard of celebrating??  Perhaps we wanted to celebrate with our 
players.  The purpose of the oranges were not to throw at the Miami players.  
They were to signify a potential Orange Bowl bid.

Weren't you the one questioning the intelligence of some others in your 
previous posts?  Start reading your own, why don't you.


Oh those mighty canes today!

tee hee  :)
-- 
           Susan E. Schudt                    0 0
     Dept. of Chemical Engineering
      Goooooooooooooooooo  IRISH!           \_____/
             Win Twins!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: chyang@engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang)
Subject: Re: MICH: 60 something HOUSTON:7
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 16:02:58 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor

In article <Bv94yA.E6u@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Todd Henderson) writes:
>chyang@engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang) writes:
>
>>	I was going to provide a game summary, but I fell asleep by the
>>middle of second quarter.  I managed to catch the Michigan's fourth
>>string football players.  They did well!  They scored, but they let
>>Houstons high power run and shoot offense get seven points.  We here
>>at Michigan are all really bummed out!  Becsause our fourth string 
>>defense was not as good as we'd had hoped.  Oh well! there is always
>>next time.  They should probably do well against IOWA.  
>
>Something similar happened at Illinois last year, and look what happened in
>the dome this year.  Does Mich. paly Houston next year?  I hope so.  I hope
>the Illinois trend repeats itself with Mich.
>

	Yes, Houston will play Michigan again next year.  But if I remeber
correctly, the game will be played here in Ann Arbor.

- CHY

>Todd
>
>P.S. I'm not a Houston fan, I just dislike the little(big) 10->100.  I guess
>     we'll have to wait until next year on this one.
>
>>	Houston's high power offense really did not look that bad!  Really!
>>They just forgot to move the ball and score, thats all!
>
>>Have Fun Folks.
>
>>- CHY  


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: SSQLCW@vmd.cso.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: lliniwek (Big 10 marching bands - NOT!)
Organization: C.C.S.O.
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 16:40:14 GMT

Hey guys, get a clue.  Big 10 bands march with music!!!  By definition that
disqualifies them as potentially the best bands in the country.  When they
show enough talent to memorize music and march at the same time then you might
have a beef!!!And yes, I go to Illinois, home of Chief Illini-dick!!
 
War-Eagle (Auburn, where the band can march AND remember)
Cameron Wesson
 
P.S.- Please take John Resigno back, we don't want him anymore!!
 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jbc4m@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (John B. Carr)
Subject: Re: Virginia WINS
Reply-To: jbc4m@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (John B. Carr)
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 21:56:23 GMT

In article <1992Sep29.091847.2897@wam.umd.edu>, mary@wam.umd.edu (Mary
Louise Cassidy) writes:
|> Gee...but it's great how the lamer games are all first giving them
|> (uva) an illusion of grandeur...
|> 

	Once again, you mean like ... Maryland ?
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 John Carr                           UNIX Support Specialist
 jbc4m@virginia.edu                  Academic Computing, Gilmer Hall
 804/982-4710                        University of Virginia
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jds23971@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Neff)
Subject: Re: Washington 17 USC 12+ ?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 18:31:35 GMT

exuwry@exu.ericsson.se (William Ryan) writes:

>On the Washington interception in the endzone that killed the
>Trojans, I noticed that the Washington player never put his knee
>down in the endzone to cause a touchback.  He intercepted the pass
>and ran off the field out of the endzone with his teammates. 

>The Washington player never touching
>his knee to the turf!  The ESPN replay cut it off when the player was
>about 2 yards from the sideline, but I don't think there could have
>been anyway that his knee touched.

>Help me, did the Pac 10 officials (and everybody else) miss an
>easy call ?  Please respond if anyone else saw this.

bill,
   It's only a safety if the player takes the ball into the end
   zone under his own power.  In this case he caught the ball in the
   end zone and never came out.  It doesn't matter how he goes down.  If
   he touches his knee, is tackled, runs out of bounds, or is pushed
   out, it is a touchback.  This is something I hear a lot, usually when
   a player gets an interception or kickoff in the end zone, starts to
   run out, and is tackled.  This is not a safety. It is a touchback.
   Just as long as he never comes out of the end zone.

   Neff

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com (Kevin Rodgers)
Subject: Re: Spreads
Organization: Buffalo Stampede
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 22:27:18 GMT

In article <16870B581.JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com> JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com writes:
>I'd appreciate seeing the spreads on the following games if anyone has them:
>
>Florida State @ Miami A&M
                 ^^^^^^^^^

Isn't that supposed to be Miami-Coral Gables?
-- 
Kevin Rodgers				kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com
Martin Marietta MS A16401		(303) 790-3971
116 Inverness Dr. East
Englewood CO 80112 USA			GO BUFFS!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college