HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pat@bcserv.wustl.edu (Niemeyer (Pat))
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: What's wrong with select() ?
Date: 19 Nov 92 21:55:44 GMT
Organization: Washington University in Saint Louis, MO USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcserv.wustl.edu


I'm totally confused.

I find that I cannot get the select() system call to 
correctly identify when there are characters waiting
on a file descriptor that I have opened with 'open()'.

It *does* seem to work for the fd associated with stdin.

The attached piece of code illustrates the difficulty.

It simply reads chars, at 1/2 second intervals, from either
either stdin or the device given as it's argument.
Before each read, it shows the status that select() returns as
to whether there are chars to be read.
(1 = pending, 0 = buffer empty)

The idea is this:  

	run it on your tty, (first as stdin, then as an argument to be opened)

	type a blurb of garbage, (and hit return if not in cbreak mode)

	and watch as it reads off character by character.

What I find is that it works perfectly for the first case (run from stdin)
but totally fails for the second (where it opens your tty).

I have tried many variations on this:
I have used a real serial port as opposed to a ptty.
and I have verified that the termio settings don't effect the problem 
as far as I can tell with the information reported by 'stty -a'.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

/*----------------------------------------------*/
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>

char getch();
int rdchk();

main(argc, argv)
int argc; char *argv[];
	{
	int iofd;

	setbuf(stdout, NULL);

	if ( argc == 2 )
		if ( (iofd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR)) == -1) 
			{
			printf("openerror\n"); 
			exit(1);
			}
		else
			printf("Opened %s\n", argv[1]);
	else
		{
		iofd=fileno(stdin);
		printf("Opened stdin\n");
		}

	while(1) 
		{
		usleep(500000);
		rdchk(iofd);
		getch(iofd);
		}
	}

char getch(iofd)
int iofd;
	{
	int got;
	char ch;

	if ( (got = read(iofd, &ch, 1) ) == -1 )
		{
		printf("read error\n");
		return(-1);
		}

	if (got > 0) 
		{
		printf("(%c)", ch); 
		return(ch);
		} 
	else 
		{
		printf("timeout");
		return(-1);
		}
	}

/* return true if a read will not block */
int rdchk( fd )
int fd;
	{
	int got;
	fd_set fdset;
	struct timeval timeout;

	FD_ZERO (&fdset);
	FD_SET (fd, &fdset);
	memset(&timeout, 0, sizeof(timeout));

	got = select (1, &fdset, NULL, NULL, &timeout);
	printf("select returned %u\n\r", got);
	return( got > 0 );
	}

/*----------------------------------------------*/

/* Pat@bcserv.wustl.edu */

-- 


Pat
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Whence Unix? (was Re: IS UNIX DEAD?) (New Thread?)
From: Phillip Godwin <cmpsg03@nt.com>
Subject: text search software(follow-up)
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A7326050B3057889@137.120.253.131.in-addr.arpa>
X-Xxdate: Fri, 20 Nov 92 09:28:48 GMT
Organization: Northern Telecom
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d9
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 14:26:31 GMT


In my last post...

> I am working on an UNIX-based application (running on HP 400 and 700 
> series workstations) that will among other things allow a user to 
> search a large number of text files for a string.  We had planned
> to parse grep output for the needed search result information, 
> but grep is just too slow.
> 
> What we are looking for is a text search program (commercial or 
> shared) that we can call from within our application.  Does anyone
> out there have any experience with UNIX searching software?  I
> would just like to get an idea of what is out there and then follow
> up on any interesting leads.

I got a couple responses (thanks Ken and Erik), but they led me to the
conclusion that I needed to refine my question.

We've pretty much decided that a non-indexed search will not work
due to the nature of the application. The files that are being 
searched will be updated once per week, and we have off-peak 
machine time that can be used for indexing after the files are
updated. 

Does anyone have any experience with packages that allow indexing 
and searching? I'd also like to hear from anyone who has used dbm or
ndbm for indexing.

If you can help, please email cmpsg03@nt.com.

Thanks...Phil
-------------------------------------------------
   Phillip Godwin    ||   Northern Telecom    
   cmpsg03@nt.com    ||   Product Verification
   (919) 481-8887    ||   RTP, NC             
-------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: etxmesa@eos.ericsson.se (Michael Salmon)
Subject: Re: make, makefile where s.'s are in another directory, clean solution ?
Keywords: make
Reply-To: etxmesa@eos.ericsson.se (Michael Salmon)
Organization: Ericsson Telecom AB
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 09:25:25 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.140313.32637@europa.asd.contel.com>, mclemore@rebec.asd.contel.com (Ken McLemore) writes:
|> we like to keep all our "s." files in one source directory and run makes
|> in other directory during development, looking for a clean solution for
|> these "s." dependencies other than an explicit entry for each ".c" that
|> has macro pathing to the source directory.
|> suggestions, thanks in advance....ken

I guess that you are using SCCS and if so then the make that comes with
your system will look for sources in directory SCCS below the current
one, check your man page for make. If you have symbolic links then it
is a snap to create a link to the common source directory. Also make
supports the suffix ~ which is translated to the prefix SCCS/s. . I
hope that this answers your question.

-- 

Michael Salmon

#include	<standard.disclaimer>
#include	<witty.saying>
#include	<fancy.pseudo.graphics>

Ericsson Telecom AB
Stockholm
From: mario@mbunix.adsp.sub.org (Mario Bayer)
Newsgroups: adsp.hw,amix.tech,comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: A3000 w/ Quantum P425S under Amix: SCSI bus hangs randomly. Help!
Date: 19 Nov 92 23:00:34 GMT
Followup-To: adsp.hw
Organization: PS -> POWERSystems

sticht@edith.deg.sub.org (Stefan Sticht) writes:

> I want to run AmigaUnix V2.03 from a Quantum ProDrive  425iS  in  an  A3000
> (16MHz, 4+2 MB memory).

> But the SCSI bus hangs randomly.  The  A3000's  and  the  drive's  LED  are
> burning forever.

> It's not likely a problem of the harddisk, because the drive works fine  in
> another A3000 (25Mhz, 2+16MB) and it seems to work fine under AmigaOS (2.04
> and 3.0), but I tested this only extensively. A Quantum  LP52S  also  works
> fine under AmigaOS.

> Then I tried another harddisk for Unix, an external Syquest. Same  problem:
> the SCSI bus hangs randomly. The Syquest works fine  (under  Unix)  on  the
> other A3000 (the 25MHz one).

> It's not a matter of termination. I'm sure I always  terminated  everything
> right. There are no terminators on the motherboard (that's the right way).

> I didn't change jumpers on the drive (exept for the unit number), as I have
> no manual for the drive and the drive works fine in the other A3000.

> So. What can I  test  now?  It  seems  to  be  a  problem  on  the  A3000's
> motherboard. Anyone out there with  an  idea  what  to  check?  Anyone  who
> already had a similar problem?

I don`t have a similar problem, but I think that the problem could be, that
the UNIX Kernel on you Hard Drive is linked to, let`s say Hard Disk ID 6, and
you jumper`d your Hard Disk ID to 1... than you AmigaUNIX Kernel can`t start,
because he searches his root device on Hard Disk ID 6... and you have ID 1!

So try all Hard Disk ID`s from 0 -> 6 and start every time you AmigaUNIX... with
the ID it will start you have the right one!

I don`t will garantuee that that`s the problem... but this is a possibility!
 
> Thank you very much for any help!

I hope this will help...

> Gruss, Stefan

---
Bye....
       .   
        ... Mario Bayer, ECA008

E-Mail: UUCP to mario@mbunix.adsp.sub.org, over Z-NETZ to M.BAYER@LINK-ATU.ZER 
           --------------------------------------------------------           
           You can also send a E-Mail to BTX Austria user 912214584          
           --------------------------------------------------------           
            Or you call my host & login as guest.. # +43(1)3306878
From: wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Markus Wild)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: CSLIP for Amiga Unix
Date: 17 Nov 92 20:46:46 GMT
Organization: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, CH


I just uploaded my changes to slip.c to implement CSLIP to 
amiga.physik.unizh.ch:amix/new/cslip.lha.

Things look almost the same to applications, only difference is that
slattach may take some more optional parameters:
  autocomp:	issue SLIP packets until a valid CSLIP packet is
		received, then switch.
  compress:	issue CSLIP packets
  noicmp:	stop them ping killers...

the same device is used, since in autocomp (and slip-only) mode it behaves
exactly like before.

Have fun;-)

-Markus
-- 
Markus M. Wild    -  wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch  |  wild@amiga.physik.unizh.ch 
Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by spontaneously moving
from where you left them to where you can't find them.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: skrenta@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Rich Skrenta)
Subject: Re: Current Amiga Unix release
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 23:09:02 GMT

mario@mbunix.adsp.sub.org (Mario Bayer) writes:
> Older versions are... AmigaUNIX v2.03, v2.02, v2.beta5... & v1.1... but
> I think that these version you can`t buy, would you? :-)

Actually, 2.03 is the last version that I trust...  (Some of you may
know why.  :-)

Be sure to apply Keith's latest serial driver fixes, recently
posted here.

--
Rich Skrenta
From: rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Current Amiga Unix release
Date: 16 Nov 1992 13:11:10 -0600
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu

In article <1992Nov15.230902.2368@news.acns.nwu.edu> skrenta@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Rich Skrenta) writes:
=mario@mbunix.adsp.sub.org (Mario Bayer) writes:
=> Older versions are... AmigaUNIX v2.03, v2.02, v2.beta5... & v1.1... but
=> I think that these version you can`t buy, would you? :-)
=
=Actually, 2.03 is the last version that I trust...  (Some of you may
=know why.  :-)
=
	Ya, but you probably have access to source so you can FIX the
	lack/(wrong level) of spl()'s around buffer manipulation routines in
	the 2.03 and earlier kernels... For others, getting 2.1 is the only
	way to prevent this nasty bug...

=Be sure to apply Keith's latest serial driver fixes, recently
=posted here.
=
	What EXACTLY did the code fix? I see that he removed register
	variables, probably due to braindeath in the 1.40 compiler, and
	added an extra parameter to a function call. I assume this extra
	parameter is the important fix?

		-Rob
From: sticht@edith.deg.sub.org (Stefan Sticht)
Newsgroups: adsp.hw,amix.tech,comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re:  A3000 w/ Quantum P425S under Amix: SCSI bus hangs randomly. Help!
Distribution: world
Date: 22 Nov 92 16:40:19 MET
Organization: private

In article <371@mbunix.adsp.sub.org> mario@mbunix.adsp.sub.org (Mario Bayer) writes:
>sticht@edith.deg.sub.org (Stefan Sticht) writes:
>
>I don`t have a similar problem, but I think that the problem could be, that
>the UNIX Kernel on you Hard Drive is linked to, let`s say Hard Disk ID 6, and
>you jumper`d your Hard Disk ID to 1... than you AmigaUNIX Kernel can`t start,
>because he searches his root device on Hard Disk ID 6... and you have ID 1!

That's not the problem, because the login: prompt shows up most times.
The hangup happens later.

Gruss, Stefan
From: rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Interworks Enlan-DFS software
Date: 16 Nov 1992 13:18:46 -0600
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu

In article <mhall.0fh1@amiganet.chi.il.us> mhall@amiganet.chi.il.us (Mike Hall) writes:
=About CBM's forthcoming (?) AmigaDOS peer-to-peer Ethernet support: 
=would anyone care to comment on upgrade policies for users of the current
=version?
=
	From what I've heard the peer to peer works over tcp/ip layers,
	which is good, but it does NOT include telnet, ftp, nfs, rsh
	and company. i.e. it'll network Amiga's but it won't Internetwork
	with other systems. I assume they'll sell a package that
	adds telnet and company tho.

	Hopefully it would ship with sana II drivers for serial, parallel,
	SCSI and ethernet so all you'd have to do is buy the hardware you
	need to make it work.

	Has anybody heard whether the peer-to-peer networking will allow
	export and import of resources like printers and other arbitrary
	devices? Or if an add on package with telent, ftp, rsh etc would
	also include lpd so AmigaUNIX systems could be used for printing,
	or make use of an ADOS machine's printer?
	
	OS/2 and PC-NFS allow access to network printers and it's annoying that
	the Amiga tcp/ip software can't do this, either through lpd or by using
	rsh with stdin; HINT, HINT, HINT! I heard tell of a C= internal ADOS lpd
	hack, could this be put into the next TCP/IP release?

		-Rob
From: rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Current Amiga Unix release
Date: 17 Nov 1992 14:19:28 -0600
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu

In article <1992Nov17.190416.5920@news.acns.nwu.edu> skrenta@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Rich Skrenta) writes:
=sck@watson.ibm.com (Scott C. Kennedy) writes:
=> For those who did not know. Amix 2.03 was the last version the Rich Skrenta 
=> (the original poster) worked on before he "left" Commodore.
=
=2.03 was the last Amiga Unix release put out before the number of
=people in the Amiga Unix group dropped to zero.  I was technically
=the last one, and I did leave, no quotes.
=
	
	Just a short addition. An individual not directly in the UNIX
	group did work on the kernel and utilities that resulted in
	the 2.1 release. I will let that person identify themselves if
	they wish to. Jan Carlson spent many long hours, along with the
	beta testers that were left, testing the resulting code. The
	big change from 2.03->2.1 is the protection of data structures
	involved with buffer operations at properl spl() levels
	so the data structures won't be corrupted.
	
	This corruption showed up mainly as ufs "caused" panics, the real
	problem being ufs chows buffers like their going out of style, i.e.
	fast and furrious, and so when doing stuff like news unbatching alot
	of buffers would be created and destroyed, when the chains weren't
	protected properly,.  i.e. use of spl() to prevent interruption in
	critical regions, they would get corrupted and BOOM! Panic time.
	The buffer routines were also used by many other sections of the kernel
	so it wasn't just UFS that was effected but UFS placed the most stress
	on the code.

	For this reason, I suggest anybody with 2.03 try to get 2.1 as soon
	as possible since it is only a matter of time, or if you use ufs,
	before panics will occur.

	2.1 also has tweeks to the uucp subsystem so it doesn't count as a user,
	tweeks to the console login so the console devices only count as 1
	user, some sysadm cleanup, newer revs of the PD code most
	notably mtools has been adapted to 1.44M IBM format and the
	format command can handle 720k, 880k and 1.44M if you have the HD
	floppy.

		-Rob
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: lgibb@nyx.cs.du.edu (Lance Gibb)
Subject: Novice(ie. Ignorant) user
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 01:26:00 GMT


Forgive the ignorance, but I just bought a 3000ux - not for unix, but
simply for Amiga Dos.  The price was extremely good for just a plain
3000 that unix was simply a free bonus.
 
Question:
What good is Unix to me?  How can I make use of it?  What do most
people reading this newsgroup do with their unix machines?
 
Initially I'd just like to learn the ins and outs of the command
structure, learn my way around some of the unix shells, etc...  The
current USENET site that I am writing this from is menu driven, with
the option to go into shell - currently I am only capable of using 
the menus, but would like to get a better grasp on whats really behind the
system I'm using.
 
Any suggestions on how I can make the most of my machine would be 
greatly appreciated.
 
-
From: scotts@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (Scott Scecina)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Help!!
Date: 17 Nov 92 02:15:58 GMT
Organization: Virginia Tech Computer Science Dept, Blacksburg, VA

crash@ckctpa.UUCP (Frank "Crash" Edwards) writes:
> No problem.  Perhaps the University could use some consulting in some
> area where I could be of assistance?!  I'm always willing to trade
> some experience/talent for cold, hard cash...


(* hahahah - _HYSTERICAL, falling-on-the-floor, laughter!!*)

Don't count on it! How about warm, heart-felt thank-you's instead :) 

Besides most of the AMI-UNIX owner's (and DEC owners as well) only use the
UNIX side to compile their projects.

-Scott

(hey guys on 'ugrad - don't hurt me... I was only kidding!)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: sck@watson.ibm.com (Scott C. Kennedy)
Subject: Re: Current Amiga Unix release
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:51:20 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research Center

In article <abeech.721952789@kraken>, abeech@kraken.itc.gu.edu.au (Adrian Beech) writes:
|> skrenta@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Rich Skrenta) writes:
|> 
|> >mario@mbunix.adsp.sub.org (Mario Bayer) writes:
|> >> Older versions are... AmigaUNIX v2.03, v2.02, v2.beta5... & v1.1... but
|> >> I think that these version you can`t buy, would you? :-)
|> 
|> >Actually, 2.03 is the last version that I trust...  (Some of you may
|> >know why.  :-)
|> 
|> Maybe you would like to tell the rest of us why?

For those who did not know. Amix 2.03 was the last version the Rich Skrenta 
(the original poster) worked on before he "left" Commodore.

|> >Be sure to apply Keith's latest serial driver fixes, recently
|> >posted here.
|> 
|> What serial driver fixes?  I never saw anything come this way.  Can they
|> be found on any ftp sites?

You can find them on amiga.physik.unizh.ch in /amix/new/ser-fixes
or on any mirror of amiga.physik.
-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
Scott C. Kennedy (sck@watson.ibm.com)  | This post does not reflect the intent 
VLSI Design Group System Administrator | or actions of my employer, nor their 
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Facility | intent or actions reflect mine.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
agoraphobia (n) - fear of implementing or of being trapped in open systems
Xref: sparky comp.unix.amiga:2456 comp.sys.amiga.programmer:16190 comp.sys.amiga.tech:155
From: traynor@fnalf.fnal.gov
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: AmigaUnix: does it come with Fortran, X, or SLIP?
Date: 22 Nov 92 04:46:07 GMT
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

Hello--

A couple of questions:

Does AmigaUnix come with a Fortran compiler built in?  Is one available?
If so, what is the price?

Does AmigaUnix come with a useable X-Windows/Motif?  Does it come with 
SLIP?  

What tape drives does it support?

Please e-mail replies directly.  Thank you.

					-Mike Traynor

NNN  NN DDDD    Mike Traynor (ND '86)(Rice '93?) |||     Amiga 500 owner   ///
 N N N   D  D   Fermilab PO Box 500 MS 221 E683  |||     w/MMR 7 Meg DRAM ///
 N  NN   D  D   Batavia IL, 60510               //|\\    190 Meg HD   \\\/// 
NN   NN DDDD    (708) 879-6095 [ans. mach.]    /// \\\   14.4Kbps modem\XX/
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: skrenta@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Rich Skrenta)
Subject: Re: uucp over tcp, the quest goes on
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 01:53:24 GMT

crash@ckctpa.UUCP (Frank "Crash" Edwards) writes:
> wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Markus Wild) writes:
> >imsg >^PRLOGIN^@msg-RLOGIN
> >HANDSHAKE FAILED: REMOTE REJECT AFTER LOGIN

I'm in the process of setting up uucp over tcp right now (what
a nightmare).  I got the same error.

Trussing the listen daemon into uucico shows that uucico is looking
for LOGNAME "uucp" in the Permissions file -- add an entry, and it
works fine.

--
Rich Skrenta
From: mhall@amiganet.chi.il.us (Mike Hall)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Interworks Enlan-DFS software
Date: 15 Nov 92 19:06:22 GMT
Organization: Amiga Network Information Systems

About CBM's forthcoming (?) AmigaDOS peer-to-peer Ethernet support: 
would anyone care to comment on upgrade policies for users of the current
version?

Just wondering...


--
Mike Hall       708-393-6350
mhall@amiganet.chi.il.us
From: abeech@kraken.itc.gu.edu.au (Adrian Beech)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Problem with shutdowning...
Keywords: AmigaUNIX
Date: 19 Nov 92 05:01:04 GMT
Organization: ITC, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

This is an urgent plea for some help!

At the moment I cannot fully shutdown this system.  I issue the
command "shutdown -y -g5 -i0" and the system goes through its 
normal process until the "The system is down" message appears.
After this the system just sits there and ever so often the hard
drive does something.  Whenever I reboot the system I have to
go through the painful wait of a filesystem validation.  I've
look at the system but can't find anything out of place.  Can
any suggest something?  Furthermore has anyone else had the same
sort of problem?


-- 
Adrian V. Beech                         E-MAIL: A.Beech@ext.gu.edu.au
						adrianb@spectrum.adsp.sub.org
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: robbar@aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu (N Baruch robert alla)
Subject: New Serial Driver code from Keith G. et al.
Organization: Johns Hopkins Continuing Professional Programs
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:14:27 GMT

I pulled down the serial driver code that Keith posted, added it to
the /usr/sys/amiga/driver directory and rebuilt the kernel.

The code would lock up the machine hard when I attempt to access the
serial line from Kermit. Keith's advice to keep the original source
files came in handy!  Needless to say, I restored the kernel to
its original state.

Did I miss something?  Is/Did anyone else experience problems with
this source code?

I'm running Amiga Unix 2.03


Robert Baruch
From: linnoise@bigboy (LineNoise)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Amiga vs Sun vs 80x86 Unix Systems
Date: 22 Nov 92 02:57:03 GMT
Organization: Temple University

I'm looking for a new system to buy.  If you have any information on
comparisons of the above systems, please email me.  I'm a user of all
3 systems but I haven't used unix on an Amiga or x86 machine yet.  I've
also never used low end Sun's (only the big unaffordables ones) so info
on them would also be helpful.   Thanks.

--
---linnoise@129.32.32.98  My opinions are strictly those of my own.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: seanr@lobo.rmhs.colorado.edu (Sean Reifschneider)
Subject: Re: SVR4.2
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 09:15:20 GMT
Organization: Rocky Mountain High School, Fort Collins, CO
Keywords: UNIX

In article <1992Nov22.061208.2971@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> cchu@nyx.cs.du.edu (Calvin Chu) writes:
>Isn't AT&T SVR4.2 out? Any idea when Commodore is going to come out
>with Amiga UNIX SVR4.2 or Commodore wont?

I've also heard this.  Are either of the remaining UNIX folks feverishly working
on the port?  1/2 :)  Anyone know what the features are that it has?  I've
been hearing about this new FS they're supposed to have.  Sounds impressive.
Fault tolerant and faster.  Sure would like to see some deleted file support
like NetWare has, too.

Sean