From: civl097@csc.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Pittsburgh 1991 article pt.II
Organization: University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:10:26 GMT

This is a repost of the 1991 posting:
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Before beginning the second article, a few comments. I have been very
gratified by the *large* response these articles have generated. I've
gotten about 60 mail messages since posting the first one. Keep the
messages coming. It's nice to know I'm not alone and crazy. 

This is originally posted to alt.drugs and misc.legal. There is no
need to post it there again. /bernie\, cosell@bbn.com, has volunteered
to post it to talk.politics.drugs, since I have no posting access
there. Actually, he mentioned it in passing, and I just volunteered
him, but wait a day or so before posting it there. Other than that,
post it where ever you like.

For those of you who have requested that I mail you the articles,
please see what you can get from your news system, and send a request
next week. I'll keep all of them online. 

The Pittsburgh Press is a major newspaper, I believe the largest is
Allegheny County. It is not a special interest tabloid. I can't find
any circulation numbers, strangely, but  I imagine it is well into the
hundreds of thousands. it was established June 23, 1884. That's 1884,
not 1984. The authors of this series Andrew Schneider and Mary Pat
Flaherty have won pulitzer's for something unspecified.

Finally, for those of you who can buy the paper, please do. There are
some good pictures, and peripheral articles, which I don't have time
to type in.  

I apologize for the numerous typos. Dammit, Jim, I'm a programmer, not
a typist. 


Please read this. 

Just when you think that you can no longer be surprised by the WoD,
you get this article. I was amazed. 

And now, the article....

This article appeared on the FRONT PAGE; in fact, it was the
HEADLINE!!!


--------------------------
The Pittsburgh Press
Monday, August 12, 1991

		P R E S U M E D   G U I L T Y
             The Law's Victims in the War on Drugs

	Drug agents far more likely to stop minorities

By Andrew Schneider and Mary Pat Flaherty

Part Two: The way you look

	Look around you carefully the next time you're at any of the nations
big airports, bus stations, train terminals, or on a major highway
because there may be a government agent watching you. If you're black,
Hispanic, Asian or look like a "hippie," you can almost count on it. 

	The men and women doing the spying are drug agents, the
frontline troops in the governments war on narcotics. They count their
victories in the number of people they stop because they suspect
they're carrying drugs or drug money. 

	But each year in the hunt for suspects, thousands of guiltless
citizens are stopped, most often because of their skin color.

	A 10-month Pittsburgh Press investigation of drug seizure and
forfeiture included an examination of court records on 121 "drug
courier" stops where money was seized and no drugs were discovered.
The Pittsburgh Press found that black, Hispanic and Asian people
accounted for 77 percent of the cases. 

	In making stops, drug agents use a profile, a set of
speculative behavioral traits that gauge the suspect's appearance,
demeanor and willingness to look a police officer in the eye. 

	For years, the drug courier profile counted race as a
principal indicator of the likelihood of a person's carrying drugs. 

	But today the word "profile" isn't officially mentioned by
police. Seeing the word scrawled in a police report or hearing it from
a witness chair instantly unnerves prosecutors and makes defense
lawyers giddy. Both sides know the racial implications can raise
constitutional challenges. 

	Even so, ar away from the courtrooms, the practice persists. 

	In Memphis, Tenn., in 1989, drug officers have testified,
about 75 percent of the people they stopped in the airport were black.
The latest figures available from the Air Transport Association show
that for that year only 4 percent of the flying public was black. 

	In Eagle County, Colo., the 60-mile-long strip on Interstate
70 that winds and dips past Vail and other ski areas is the setting of
a class-action suit that charges race was the main element of the
profile used in drug stops. 

	According to court documents in one of the cases that led to
the suit, the sheriff and two deputies testified that "being black or
Hispanic was and is a factor" in their drug courier profile. 

	Lawyer David Lane says that 500 people -- primarilty Hispanic
and black motorists -- were stopped and searched by Eagle County's
High Country (ED: What an appropriate name :-)) Drug Task Force during
1989 and 1990. Each time, Lane charged, the task force used an
inconstitutional profile based on race, ethnicity and out-of-state
license plates. 

	Byron Boudreaux  was one of those stopped. 

	Boudreaux was driving from Oklahoma to a new job in Canada
when Sgt. James Perry and three other task force officers pulled him
over. 

	"Sgt. Perry told me that I was stopped because my car fit the
description of someone trafficking drugs in the area," Boudreaux says.
He let the officers search his car. 

	"Listen, I was a black man travelling alone up in the
mountains of Eagle County and surrounded by four police officers. I
was going to be as cooperative as I could," he recalls. 

	For almost an hour the officers unloaded and searched the
suitcases, laundry baskets, and boxes that were wedged into Bodreaux's
car. Nothing was found. 

	"I was stopped because I was black, and that's not a great
testament to our law enforcement system," says Boudreaux, who is now
an assistant basketball coach at Queens College in Charlotte, N.C.

	In a federal trial stemming from another stop Perry made on
the same road a few months later, he testfied that because of
"astigmatism and color blindness" he was unable to distinguish among
black, Hispanic and white people. 

	U.S. District Court Judge Jim Carrigan didn't buy it and
called the seargeant's testimony "incredible.

	"If this nation were to win its war on drugs at the cost of
sacrificing its citizens' constitutional rights, it would be a Pyrrhic
victory indeed," Carrigan wrote in a court opinion. "If the rule of
law rather than the rule of man is to prevail, there cannot be one set
of search and seizure rules applicable to some and a different set
applicable to others."

Livelihood in jeopardy

	In Nashville, Tenn., Willie Jones has no doubt that police
still use a profile based on race.

	Jones, owner of a landscaping service, thought the ticket
agent at the American Airlines counter in Nashville Metro Airport
reacted strangely when he paid for his round-trip ticket to Houston. 

	"She said no one ever paid in cash anymore and she'd have to
go in the back and check on what to do," Jones says.

	What Jones didn't know is that in Nashville -- as in other
airports -- many airline employees double as piad informers for the
police. 

	The Drug Enforcement Administration usually pays them 10
percent of any money seized, says Capt, Judy Bawcum, head of the
Nashville police division that runs the airport unit. 

	Jones got his ticket. Ten minutes later, as he waited for his
plane, two drug team members stopped him.

	"They flashed their badges and asked if I was carrying drugs
or a large amount of money. I told them I didn't have any drugs, but I
had money on me to go buy some plants for my business," Jones says.

	They searched his overnight bag and found nothing. They patted
him down and felt a bulge. Jones pulled out a black plastic wallet
hidden under his shirt. It held $9,600.

	"I explained that I was going to Houston to order some
shrubbery for my nursery. I do it twice a year and pay cash because
that's the way the growers want it," says the father of three girls. 

	The drug agents took his money. 

	"They said I was going to buy drugs with it, and the dogs
sniffed it and said it had drugs on it," Jones says. He never saw the
dog.

	The officers didn't arrest Jones, but they kept the money.
They gave him a DEA receipt for cash. But under the heading of amount
and desription, Sgt. Claude Byrum wrote, "Unspecified amount of U.S.
currency." 

	Jones says losing the money almost put him out of business. 

	"That was to buy my stock. I'm known for having a good
selection fo unusual plants. That's why I go South twice a year to buy
them. Now, I've got to do it piecemeal, run out after I'm paid for a
job and buy plants for the next one," he says. 

	Jones has receipts for three years showing that each fall and
spring he buys plants from nurseries in other states. 

	"I just don't understand the government. I don't smoke. I
don't drink. I don't wear gold chains and jewelry, and I don't get
into trouble with the police," he says. "I didn't know it was against
the law for a 42-year-old black man to have money in his pocket."

	Tennessee police records confirm that the only charge ever
filed against Jones was for drag racing 15 years ago. 

	"DEA says I have to pay $900, 10 percent of the money they
took from me, just to have the right to try to get it back," Jones
says. 

	His lawyer, E.E. "Bo" Edwards filled out government forms
documenting that his client couldn't afford the $900 bond. 

	"If I'm going to feed my children, I need my truck, and the
only way I can get that $900 is to sell it," Jones says.

	It's been more than five months, and the only thing Jones has
recieved for DEA are letters saying that his application to proceed
without paying the $900 bond was deficient. "But they never told us
what those deficiencies were," says Edwards. 

	Jones is nearly resigned to losing the money. "I don't think
I'll ever get it back. But I think the only reason they thought I was
a drug dealer was because I'm black, and that bothers me."

	It also bothers his lawyer.

	"Of course he was stopped because he was black. No cop in his
right mind would try that with a white businessman. Those seizure laws
give law enforcement a license to hunt, and the target of choice for
many cops is those they believe are least capable of protecting
themselves: blacks, Hispanics, and poor whites," Edwards says.

Money still held

	In Buffalo, N.Y., on Oct. 9, Juana Lopez, a dark-skinned
Dominican, had just gotten off a bus from New York City when she was
stopped in the terminal by drug agents who wanted to search her
luggage. 

	They found no drugs, but DEA Agent Bruce Johnson found $4,750
in cash wrapped with rubber bands in her purse. the money, the
28-year-old womand said, was to pay legal fees or bail for her
common-law husband. After he began questioning her, Johnson realized
that he had arrested the husband for drugs two months earlier in the
same bus station. 

	Johnson called the office of attorney Mark Mahoney, where Ms.
Lopez said she was heading, and verified her appointment. 

	Johnson then told the woman she was free to go, but her money
would stay with him because a drug dog had reacted to it. 

	Ms. Lopez has receipts showing the money was obtained legally
-- a third of it was borrowed, another third came from the sale of
jewelry that belonged to her and her husband, and the rest from her
savings as a hair stylist in the Bronx. 

	It has been more than nine months since the money was taken,
and Assistant U.S. atorney Richard Kaufman says that the investigation
is continuing. 

	Robert Clark, a Mobile, Ala., lawyer who has defended many
travellers, says profile stops are the new form of racism. 

	"In the South in the 30's, we used to hang black folks. Now,
given any excuse at all, even legal money in their pockets, we just
seize them to death," he says.

Trivial pursuit

	"If you took all the racial elements out of profiles," you'd
be left with nothing, says Nashville lawyer Edwards, who heads a new
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers task force to
investigate forfeiture law abuses.

	"It would outrage the public to learn the trivial indicators
that police use as the basis for interfering with the roght of the
innocent."
	
	Examination of more than 310 affadavits for seizure and
profiles used by 28 different agencies reveals a conflicting colection
or traits that agents say they use to hunt down traffickers.

	Guidlines for DEA drug task force agents in three adjacent
states give conflicting advice on when officers are supposed to become
suspicios. 

	Agents in Illinois are told its suspicious if their subjects
are among the first people off a plane, because it shows they're in a
hurry. 

	In Michigan, the DEA says that being thje last off a plane is
suspicios because the subject is trying to appear unconcerned. 

	And in Ohio, agents are told suspicion should surface when
suspects deplane in the middle of a group they may be trying to lose
themsleves in the crowd. 

	One of the most mentioned indicators is that suspects were
travelling to or from a source city for drugs. 
	
	But a list of cities favored by drug couriers gleaned from the
DEA affadavits amounts to a compendium of every major community in the
United States. 

	Seeming to be nervous, looking around, pacing, looking at a
watch, making a phone call -- all things that business travellers
routinely do, especially those who are late or don't like to fly --
sound alarms to waiting drug agents. 

	Some agents cahnge their mind about what makes them suspicios.

	In Tennessee, an agent told a judge he was leery of a man
because he "walked quickly through the airport." Six weeks later, in
another affadavit, the same agent said his suspicions were aroused
because the suspect "walked with intentional slowness after getting
off the bus."

	In Albequerque, N.M., people have been stopped because they
were standing on the train platform watching people. 

	Whether you look at a police officer can be construed to be a
suspicios sign. One Maryland said he was wary because the subject
"deliberately did not look at me when he drove by my position." Yet
another Maryland trooper testified that he stopped a man because the
"driver stared at me when he passed."

	Too much baggage, or not enough will draw the attention of the
law. 

	You could be in trouble with drug agents if you're sitting in
first class and don't look as if you belong there. 

	DEA agent Paul Markonni, who is considered the "father" of the
drug courier profile, testified in a Florida court about why he
stopped a man.

	"We do see some real slimeballs, you know, some real dirtbags,
that obviously could not afford, unless they were doing something, to
fly first class," he told the court. 

	The newest extention of drug courier profiles are pagers and
cellular telephones. 

	Based on the few cases that have reached the courts, the
communication devices -- which are carried by business people, nervous
parents and patients waiting for a transplant as well as drug couriers
-- are primarily suspicios when they are found on the belts or in the
suitcases of minorities or long-haired whites. 

	for police intent on stopping someone, any reason will do.

	"If they're black, Hispanic, Asian or look like a hippie,
that's a stereotype, and the police will find some way to stop them if
that's their intent," says San Antonio lawyer Gerald Goldstein. 

The perfect profile

	A DEA agent thought that former New York Giants center Kevin
Belcher matched his profile. When Belcher got off a flight from
Detroit on March 2, he was stopped by DEA's Dallas/Fort Worth Airport
Narcotics Task Force. 

	The Texas officers had been called a short while earlier by a
DEA agent at Detroit's Metro Airport. A security screener had spotted
a big, black man carrying a large amount of money in his jacket
pocket, the Detroit agent reported to his southern colleagues. 

	Belcher was questioned about the purpose of the trip and was
asked whether he had any money. He gave the agents $18,265. 

	Belcher explained that he was going to El Past to buy some
classic old cars -- "1968 or '69 Camaros are what I'm looking for."
Belcher, whose professional football career ended after a near-fatal
traffic accident in New Jersey, told the agents he owned four Victory
Lane Quick Oil Change outlets in Michigan. The money came from sales,
he said, and cash was what auctioneers demanded. 

	A drug-sniffing dog was called, it reacted, and the money was
seized. 

	Agent Rick Watson to Belcher he was free to go "but that I was
going to detain the monies to determine the origin of them."

	In his seizure affadavit, Watson listed the matches he made
between Belcher and the profile of "other narcotic currency couriers
encountered af DFW airport."

	Included in Watson's profile was that Belcher had bought a
one-way ticket on the date of travel; was traveling to a "source"
city, El Paso, "where drug dealers have long been known to be
exporting large amounts of marijuana to other parts of the country";
and was carrying $100, $50, $20, $10, and $5 bills, "which is
consistent with drug asset seizures."

	Watson made no mention as to what denomination other than $1
bills was left for non-drug traffickers to carry. 

	"The drug courier profile can be absolutely anything that the
police officer decides it is at that moment," says Albequerque defense
lawyer Nancy Hollander, one of the nation's leading authorities on
drug profile stops.

Wide net cast

	Officials are reluctant to reveal how many inncocent people
are ensnared each day by profile stops. Most police departments say
they don't keep that information. Those that do are reluctant to
discuss it. 

	"We don't like to talk much about what we seize at the
(Nashville) airport because it might stir up the public and make the
airport officials unhappy because we are somehow harrassing people. It
would be great if we could keep the whole operation secret," says
Capt. Bawcum, in charge of the Airport's drug team. 

	Capt. Rudy Sandoval, commander of Denver's vice bereau, says
he doesn't keep the airport numbers but estimated his police searched
more than 2,000 people in 1990, but arrested on 49 and seized money
from fewer than 50. 

	At Pittsburgh's airport, numbers are kept. The team searched
527 people last year, and arrested 49. 

	A fedral court judge in Buffalo, N.Y., says police stop to
mant innocent people to catch to few crooks. 

	Judge George Pratt said he was shocked that police charged on
10 of the 600 people stopped in 1989 in the Buffalo airport and
decried encroaching on the constitutional rights of 590 innocent
people. 

	In his opinion in the case, Pratt said that by conducting
unreasonable searches: "It appears that they have sacrificed the
Fourth Amendment by detaining 590 innocent people in order to arrest
10 who are not -- all in the name of the 'war on drugs.' When, pray
tell, will it end? Where are we going?"-- 
Shawn Valentine Hernan		  |Wizard-wanna-be           |    STOP 
Computing and Information Services|Systems & Networks        |the war on drugs!
University of Pittsburgh	  |valentin@unix.cis.pitt.edu|   It is a 
(412) 624-6425			  |valentin@PITTVMS.BITNET   |  WITCHHUNT!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

reposted by:-
Brandon Hutchison,University of Canterbury,Christchurch
                  New Zealand