HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: stark@lindblat.cc.monash.edu.au (Justin Stark)
Subject: Bizzare Bidding!
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 01:22:50 GMT

This is a hand from a graded pairs event held last night.

                 J 6
                 10 3 2
                 J 10 4
                 J 6 5 4 2
   K Q 10 8 5 4             9
                            Q J 9 5
   A K 8 2                  9 7 6 3
   9 8 7                    A K Q 10
                 A 7 3 2
                 A K 8 7 6 4
                 Q 5
                 3

Sorry about this, but South was opener and the final contract EW was 6Sx.
Or at least that is where partner and I managed to play the hand.  At the 
table the NS pair said that it looked like a rather bizzare contract and,
after going for 500 we agreed.  Later on, in a little post match summary of the
hand we saw that 6S makes.  The rest of the field played in 4S or 3NT, with one
pair choosing 5C as their final resting place.  

Anyway, at our table the bidding went:
	1H  X  2H  X (*1)
        /   4S /   4N (*2)
        /   5D /   5H (*3)
        /   5S /   5N 
        X   6S /   /
        X   /  /   /
       
	How would you play on a 10H lead!

Justin.
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| stark@lindblat.cc.monash.edu |  To be or not to be, who really cares?  |
| stark@yoyo.cc.monash.edu     |  ---------------------------------------|
|------------------------------|					 |
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: gerry@bluemoon.use.com (Gerard M. Foley)
Subject: Re: Ethics question
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[024])
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 09:06:57 EST

adam@irvine.com (Adam Beneschan) writes:

> >   Partnerships are now held responsible for having agreements.
> >   Not having an agreement will result in a procedural penalty.
> 
> I really disagree here, and even if the directors in the Midwest have
> been instructed to assess a procedural penalty, I think it's wrong.  
> 
>                                 -- Adam

   This sounds like an outright invitation for players to ask for
an explanation of every bid in the hopes of finding a procedural
penalty somewhere in there.  I'm so glad I only play at the local
club!

gerry@bluemoon.rn  My amateur radio callsign is K8EF, and my
packet radio address is K8EF@W8CQK.OH.USA.NA
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: m36150p@kaira.hut.fi (Janne Veikko Petteri Kallunki)
Subject: The multi horror
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 07:30:23 GMT


Dealer North/N-S vulnerable/IMPs
You as a south hold KJT9xxxx/7x/8/9x.
Your partner starts with 2D which is multi 
(6+card major -11 points or 21-22 points balanced).
East pass.
What's your bid?

I did 3 spades.
West pass and my partner's bid is 3 NT.
Now, what should I do?



I did 6 spades and my partner raised it to 7.
Which cards had she?



She had AQ8/AK/ATx/ATxxx so it was one down and we lost
17 imps.

What should I have done?
Don't tell me that 6 spades wasn't a good bid because I know that.

-----
Janne 'Jake' Kallunki m36150p@kaira.hut.fi jkallunk@otax.hut.fi
p. home 4553831, work 1545182
"One-Two-Three-Four"
	-Dee-Dee Ramone
From: knude@daimi.aau.dk (Per Knudsgaard)
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
Subject: Looking for bridge-clubs in Edinbourgh, Oxford and Cambridge.
Keywords: bridgeclubs
Date: 12 Dec 92 14:29:25 GMT
Distribution: eunet
Organization: DAIMI: Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, Denmark


   Hi,

   I'm looking for bridge-clubs in Edinbourgh, Oxford and Cambridge, Great Britain. 
I would like a snail-mail address, and the name of a contact-person.

   Answers by e-mail please.

   Per Knudsgaard, knude@daimi.aau.dk
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: bharat@cs.uiuc.edu (R. Bharat Rao)
Subject: Re: Rate this sequence
Reply-To: bharat@cs.uiuc.edu
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 18:53:08 GMT

shamrake@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Danil Suits) writes:
>Please critique East's actions in this auction:
>E-W Vulnerable at MATCHPOINTS

>   AKxx
>   Axxxx
>   KJxx
>   ---

>WEST    NORTH    EAST    SOUTH
> 1D      3C       6C      P
> 6D      X        XX      P
> P       7C       P       P
> X       P        P       P

The following assumes that, 1D shows 4+ diamonds.  Else, E should just
bid 3H at this turn (Hi Danil!).

6C: Quite dramatic, but converys the power of this hand nicely.  You
    want to be in 6.
XX: Greedy.  This is matchpoints, so 6D doubled should beat out all
major suit contracts if you make, and a doubled OT would be nice too.
This is almost a guaranteed very good score; why risk a pull.

P: About the only way to recover now -- forcing, showing first round
   club control.  However, 7D may be no picnic with a slow major suit
   loser. 

P: Nothing else to do here.

In summary, good marks for the imaginative 6C bid.  Several demerits
for the redouble when opposition was kind enough to double you.

>-- The Shamrake --    You just can't top the

Bharat

--
R. Bharat Rao                         E-mail: bharat@cs.uiuc.edu
AI Group, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology
405 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801   (217)-333-5978 (O), 337-6498(H)
Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana
From: bpwing@phoenix.princeton.edu (Ben Wing)
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
Date: 14 Dec 92 22:04:13 GMT
Subject: Re: Inverted minors over 1D and 2/1 GF
Organization: Princeton University
X-Subliminal-Message: You can quit reading news anytime you want.

In article <1992Dec14.182326.7960@wuecl.wustl.edu> geppo@spot.wustl.edu (Giuseppe Bianchi) writes:
|
|There have been some very recent postings about 1D-3C invitational with
|clubs, in order to play 2C GF.
|
|It's a couple of years that I'm a fan of 1D-3C (and 1C-2D) intermediate/limit 
|raise (say 6/7 to 8/9 pts) in Diamonds (clubs).
|
|Basically the main point for this bidding is:
|   How do you show a limit raise in a minor if you don't use such a tool?
|   [I hate to rebid 1NT over 1D with xx, xx, Axxxx, Axx - or adjust the 
|    point count/location if you don't like this example]
|
|Thus I *have* to play 1D-2C *non* GF, with all the problems that this
|bidding has.
|
|Well: does Professor and all the other net.experts&champions care to comment
|the following questions:
|   1) How do you play inverted minors if you don't use 1D-3C with the meaning
|      of limit raise? (BTW: do you play 1D-2D game forcing or Limit raise or
|      better?)
|   2) How to you modify your 2/1 scheme if 1D-3C is used with this meaning
|      (or WJS, or SJS or what else you want) -
|      particularly do you *have* necessarily to play 1D-2C *not* GF, as
|      Lawrence states, and how do you treat the sequences 1D-2NT and
|      1D-2C-xxx-2NT (Professor has already given some interesting
|      points on 1D-2C-xxx - maybe he'd like to say something more)?
|
|
|PS: of course I'm not asking to rewrite here the Lawrence book. I'm 
|interested to know how the people that use *both* inverted minors and 2/1
|put together those systems, and *how* the people that do *not* use 1D-3C,
|but *use* inv.min handle the 6-10 point count hands with raise in the 
|minor. (BTW: and if somebody is *against* inv.min, his opinion and 
|motivations are strongly required).
|

I use 1D - 2D and 1C - 2C as limit raise or better, and would probably
respond 1N on the hand above.  However, I simply cannot remember the last
time that an inverted minor raise or a sequence like 1D - 1N or 1C - 1N
came up, and I've been playing a fair amount lately.  (perhaps it has
something to do with using a weak NT?)  So IMHO it doesn't seem like a very
useful topic to spend much time on.

ben
--

"Can't we all just get along?"
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: willner@head-cfa.harvard.edu (Steve Willner)
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
Subject: Re: cue-bid or clubs?
Date: 14 Dec 92 21:48:20 GMT
Organization: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA,  USA


In article <1992Dec10.180513.26050@wuecl.wustl.edu>,
geppo@spot.wustl.edu (Giuseppe Bianchi) writes: 
>     -
>     Jxx
>     AKxxx
>     AJ9xx
> 
> E     S     W     N
> p     1D    1S    2H(*)      (forcing)
> p     ???

Put me down with everybody else who bids 3C.  While 2H would not
promise a rebid over 3D or 3H, 3C should be forcing in most
partnerships.  If it isn't in yours, I think 4C would be better than
either 2S (second choice) or 3S.

[Reach 6H.  Partner held:]
>    Axx
>    AK8xx
>    x
>    K8xx

> At the table, 6H went down 1: lead of spade, partner ruffed immediately, 
> and cashed AK of trump (misplay? in this case which is your line?). 

Although this line looks reasonable, I think it's inferior.  After
the ruff, you are losing a heart unless the Q is stiff, so you will
have to play clubs for no losers.  Given that you will do that,
you don't need a spade ruff.

Cashing the H-AK doesn't help, even if the Q drops doubleton.  If you
lose a club, the defense forces dummy with a spade (or cashes a spade
or two in other variations), so you still lose a trump.

So the best line seems to be to avoid more than one heart loser and
then guess clubs.  Win S-A and lead a heart to the J.  If the Q goes
up on the left, ruff the spade return low, cash the H-J, club (or
D-AK,ruff) to hand, draw trumps, and guess clubs.  (You will want to
play D-AK,ruff first to see if you can get a partial count.)  If
anything else happens on the first heart lead, play should be obvious
until the club guess.

Cashing a high heart first is clearly inferior.  It picks up stiff Q
(2 cases) but loses to Qxxx on the left (4 cases) when another spade
forces out the jack of hearts.
-- 
Steve Willner            Phone 617-495-7123         Bitnet:   willner@cfa
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA                 Internet: willner@cfa.harvard.edu
  member, League for Programming Freedom; contact league@prep.ai.mit.edu
From: shamrake@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Danil Suits)
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
Subject: Looking for notes
Date: 11 Dec 92 19:17:30 GMT
Organization: Zansellquasure Flamarion Bridge Club

I'm looking for notes about two different sequences.

1)
   1m    2NT (forcing)
   3m (checkback)
   3X (shortness)

Kantar and Sontag were using something like this, so
I thought I would ask if anyone can supply followups.

2)
   1D   3C  natural and invitational (limitted)

This looks like it would take considerable pressure
off of the 1D-2C sequences.  Can anyone supply
followups here? Of course, it would also be good to
know how this affects 1D-2C auctions.

Danil

-- 
-- The Shamrake --    You just can't top the
@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu      Copper Top (tm)
From: sperbr@vccnw12.its.rpi.edu (Ron E Sperber)
Subject: problem over preempt
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:37:08 GMT

Playing on okbridge with someone who is a reasonable player,but in a 
somewhat unfamiliar partnership you pick up the following hand red vs white
at IMPs:

AJ
KQJ8
A86
AJ98

RHO opens 4D. Your call.

	-Ron

-- 
    Ron Sperber  sperbr@rpi.edu Ron_Sperber@mts.rpi.edu Ron_sperber@rpitsmts
	"All the World's indeed a stage/And we are merely players"
	"Performers and Portrayers/Each anothers audience        "
	"Outside the gilded cage"                     	-Rush,"Limelight"
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: c85perwe@IDA.LiU.SE (Per Westling)
Subject: Re: Bidding problem (from Okbridge)
Reply-To: c85perwe@und.ida.liu.se
Organization: CIS Dept, University of Linkoping, Sweden
Distribution: rec
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 14:27:03 GMT

In article <C85PERWE.92Dec13180341@odal20.IDA.LiU.SE> of rec.games.bridge, c85perwe@und.ida.liu.se writes:
>Some bidding problems from Okbridge.  They occured recently so if you
>intend to play there you might want to skip this.
>
>Anyway, playing SA, how would continue bid this after opening 2C
>(West).  Don't ask me why my partner choose 2C with just 20 HCP.
>
>WEST          EAST
>AKQJ          T9x
>KTxx          AQx
>Q             xxx
>KQ9x          Axxx

The actual bidding went 
2C       2D
2S       2NT
3H       4C
4H       4S
Pass

Not the best bidding by me...
Anyway, the majors split 3-3 and clubs split 4-1 so we made +6 when 6C
was one down.  Isn't life unfair? :-)

>Another hand, where you once more hear partner, WEST, open 2C:
>
>EAST
>xx
>QJT9xxxx
>x
>xx
>
>You decide that 4H is a descriptive bid, and your partner bid 4S.
>What do you bid now?

Partner had AKQxx, K, AKQx, xxx.  Spades was 4-2 so 4S is down while
4H make.

Anyway, I took 4S as a cuebid with hearts as trumph (unlikely [s]he
would introduce a new suit if I have shown an 8 bagger) and as I can't
have an ace on that bid (can I?) I cued my single diamond and was
quite shocked when parnter PASSed 5D...
--
Per Westling              |
Mardtoprsgatan 15         |  c85perwe@und.ida.liu.se
S-582 48 LINKOPING        |  In praise of Idleness -- Bertrand Russel
SWEDEN                    |
Stuff regarding DPP may be sent to x90perwe@ida.liu.se instead.
From: tnh@sw.stratus.com (Tim Hill)
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
Subject: Re: Looking for notes
Date: 11 Dec 92 21:48:50 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigbootay.sw.stratus.com

In article <85163@ut-emx.uucp>, shamrake@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Danil Suits) writes:
> 2)
>    1D   3C  natural and invitational (limitted)
> 
> This looks like it would take considerable pressure
> off of the 1D-2C sequences.  Can anyone supply
> followups here? Of course, it would also be good to
> know how this affects 1D-2C auctions.

This is the standard treatment in the 2/1 system.  If you agree that 1D-2C
is game forcing, you're pretty well forced to agree that 1D-2N and 1D-3C are
both invitational (~10-12).  See Hardy.

For an excellent discussion of the alternative treatments of 1D-2C and their
implications, see Lawrence's _Workbook on the 2/1 System_ (it's about 1/3 of
the book).
-- 
Tim Hill
Stratus Computer, Inc.                  tnh@vos.stratus.com
55 Fairbanks Boulevard                  508-460-2232
Marlborough, MA  01752                  fax 508-624-7488
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: altus@leland.Stanford.EDU (Steve Altus)
Subject: Re: problem over preempt
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 09:13:12 GMT

In article <fbl2wbl@rpi.edu> sperbr@vccnw12.its.rpi.edu (Ron E Sperber) writes:
>Playing on okbridge with someone who is a reasonable player,but in a 
>somewhat unfamiliar partnership you pick up the following hand red vs white

what do you mean somewhat unfamiliar partnership?  had you ever played with
them?  then it was an ESTABLISHED partnership.  

>at IMPs:
>
>AJ
>KQJ8
>A86
>AJ98
>
>RHO opens 4D. Your call.
>
>	-Ron
>

well, you can't bid 4NT since if asked partner will not know exactly
what you're showing and you'll get a procedural penalty.

you can't bid 4H because if asked how many hearts that shows partner
will either get it wrong or say that it doesn't promise any specific
number of hearts, either of which would subject you to a procedural
penalty.  (unless, of course, you have system notes which SHOW that
it should have more than four hearts.)

you can't double, because if asked partner will have to either say 
this doesn't guarantee any shape or that it guarantees all unbid
suits, either copping out on his explaination or getting it wrong,
and unless you have system notes which specifically show that it 
SHOULD show all unbid suits, you'll be subject to a procedural penalty.


gee, i hope you don't pick this hand up in the midwest!


:-)


--steve altus




Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (Jeremy Mathers)
Subject: Re: Place the Blame
Reply-To: pynq@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: D. J. Dougherty & Associates
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 01:07:36 GMT

In article <9212171310.aa09953@Paris.ics.uci.edu> kibler@turing.ICS.UCI.EDU (Dennis Kibler) writes:
...
>>2 Play :
>
>>Butler Teams        S AJ964                   N      E     S      W
>>EW                  H KJ74                    1C+    1N*   X~     2C
>>D-N                 D AK5                     2S     P     4S   all pass
>>		    C J
>>                                              + precision
>>	S KQ3               S 5               * minors
>>	H Q10962            H 3               ~ 5-8 any shape
>>	D 8                 D Q9763
>>	C AQ94              C 1086532
>
>>		    S 10872          Trick 1: 5C 7C QC JC
>>		    H A85            Trick 2: AC ruffed
>>		    D J1042          Trick 3: AS
>>		    C K7
>
>>Declarer could no longer avoid 4 losers;N was told he should have crossed to
>>AH and finessed trumps. Is this correct?
>
>
>Hmnn, East announces that he has a maximum of 3 cards in the majors.
>Where do you think the spades honors are? Yes, go to table and finesse.

This is, of course, true, provided entries are plentiful.

Unfortunately, in this case, there is only one entry to the table, and
declarer needs it for the heart finesse (which is almost certainly on).

Thus, he has to pray for a favorable spade position.

This is pretty elementary stuff.

************************************************************************
A bird in the bush usually has a friend in there with him.

	- pynq@quads.uchicago.edu, who is still costing the net
	  hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars, every time he posts -
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: ttllarsa@eua.ericsson.se (Lars Andersson)
Subject: Re: Pasadena KO Trump Suit
Reply-To: ttllarsa@eua.ericsson.se
Organization: Ellemtel Telecom Systems Labs, Stockholm, Sweden
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 09:37:36 GMT

In article 36@dcs.simpact.com, jschuler@dcs.simpact.com () writes:
>
>Your in 4 Spades and
>your trump suit is:
>
>	K	Declarer has 2 hearts, dummy 3+. The defense
>	J	start with a diamond to Easts Ace, the King of Hearts,
>	7	a Heart to Wests Ace, Heart ruffed by East with the
>	6	Eight and overruffed with your Ace. A trump to dummy
>		draws the Nine from West and you play the ???????
>	A
>	5
>	4
>	3
>	2
>
>
>This problem was given to me by Jon Wright.


With T8 East would ruff with the ten. Ruffing with the 8 indicates
singleton 8 (always a trump loser) or Q8.
This means that you should play the king of spades.

--lars

Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: rudy@netcom.com (Rudy)
Subject: bunch of slam hands from pasadena
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 21:26:08 GMT

Here are some interesting hands most of which came up Saturday in the
Flight A Pairs in Pasadena.  I was shocked that not one of them was
gotten right at the table against me.

(in all cases dummy will be on the left)
AJxx    QT9xx                      1H (2C) P (3C)
AQxxxx  xx                         X   P  3S  and then you get to 6S... :)
AKT     Jxx
---     xxx                        Opening lead: high club spot.


Q3      AT9875
AKJ     32
Q9765   --
AJ7     K9654             1D - 1S - 1N - 4S, KD ruffed, heart to the A, QS, KS
                          Ace, follow, Spade to the Jack and spade LHO pitching
                          a diamond.  What's your plan to make 6?
(this isn't so much a play problem as an interesting hand because of the
positions that can develop)

K8      AQ93
AKT     J53
QJ83    A972
AQ65    K4                6NT, heart to the Ace, QD, low, low, K, and now
                          two possibilities: heart OR club.  WHat's your plan?
                          On the diamonds should you cash them now RHO 
                          pitches 1 spade, LHO 2 hearts.

KQTxx   AJ98xx
Axx     x
87      AJ9
AK8     932               2S (X) 4S -- KD lead, low, 2, your plan to make 6?

btw, for all those masterpoints are worth, our opponent and all 6000 of his
masterpoints couldn't find the 12th trick on this hand.


Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: geppo@spot.wustl.edu (Giuseppe Bianchi)
Subject: Inverted minors over 1D and 2/1 GF
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 18:23:26 GMT


There have been some very recent postings about 1D-3C invitational with
clubs, in order to play 2C GF.

My posting was inspired by a recent statement of Don Varvel:
>Finally, quite
>a number of the "Eastern Scientific" bidders who use inverted minor
>raises use 1D-3C (and even better, 1C-2D) as a limit raise of partner's
>minor.  (Our resident slow-arrivalist will undoubtedly explain why
>that is backwards.  I like 1C-2D and don't much care for 1D-3C used
>this way.)

It's a couple of years that I'm a fan of 1D-3C (and 1C-2D) intermediate/limit 
raise (say 6/7 to 8/9 pts) in Diamonds (clubs).

Basically the main point for this bidding is:
   How do you show a limit raise in a minor if you don't use such a tool?
   [I hate to rebid 1NT over 1D with xx, xx, Axxxx, Axx - or adjust the 
    point count/location if you don't like this example]

Thus I *have* to play 1D-2C *non* GF, with all the problems that this
bidding has.

Well: does Professor and all the other net.experts&champions care to comment
the following questions:
   1) How do you play inverted minors if you don't use 1D-3C with the meaning
      of limit raise? (BTW: do you play 1D-2D game forcing or Limit raise or
      better?)
   2) How to you modify your 2/1 scheme if 1D-3C is used with this meaning
      (or WJS, or SJS or what else you want) -
      particularly do you *have* necessarily to play 1D-2C *not* GF, as
      Lawrence states, and how do you treat the sequences 1D-2NT and
      1D-2C-xxx-2NT (Professor has already given some interesting
      points on 1D-2C-xxx - maybe he'd like to say something more)?


PS: of course I'm not asking to rewrite here the Lawrence book. I'm 
interested to know how the people that use *both* inverted minors and 2/1
put together those systems, and *how* the people that do *not* use 1D-3C,
but *use* inv.min handle the 6-10 point count hands with raise in the 
minor. (BTW: and if somebody is *against* inv.min, his opinion and 
motivations are strongly required).

Thanks to everybody that cares to comment.

Giuseppe.
Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
From: adam@irvine.com (Adam Beneschan)
Subject: Re: What does the RKCB abbreviation mean?
Organization: Irvine Compiler Corp., Irvine, California, USA
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 19:04:20 GMT

In article <1gnmv6INN5uu@transfer.stratus.com> tnh@sw.stratus.com 
(Tim Hill) writes:

>   I hereby declare the following to be Standard Roman Key Card Blackwood:
>
>   RKCB permits the 4NT bidder to learn about the top three trump honors as 
>   well as side aces.
>
>   4NT is ordinary Blackwood when it's an opening bid or the first response
>   to a one-of-a-suit opening.

A lot of people use 4NT as RKCB, not ordinary Blackwood, as the first
response to a one-of-a-suit opening.  I'm not arguing that one is
better than the other.  But if you're learning a new convention here,
it may be simpler to remember if you make 4NT RKCB in this case also.
(Of course, *I* never forget conventions.  I may have trouble
remembering what suit my partner discarded, but I always remember
conventions.  [Yeah, right.])  

. . . . .

>   After a 5C or 5D response, the 4NT bidder may ask about the trump queen by
>   making the cheapest bid outside the trump suit (e.g., 1H-3H-4N-5C-5D or
>   1H-3H-4N-5D-5S).  Responses:
>
>        no trump queen:                       cheapest bid in the trump suit
>        trump queen, no side king:            5NT
>        trump queen, at least one side king:  show the cheapest side king

Clarification:  you don't want to show the cheapest side king if it
goes past 6 of your suit.  If the auction goes 1H-3H-4N-5D-5S, and you
have the trump queen but your only side king is the spade king, don't
show it.  Bid 5NT here.  The 4NT bidder should realize that in this
case, 5NT denies the club and diamond kings, but responder may or may
not have the spade king.

I'm sure all of this is discussed in detail in the Kearse and Kantar
books Tim recommended.

                                -- Adam