HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: reams@crchh462.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Cary Reams)
Subject: Re: Playoff picture
Reply-To: reams@bnr.ca
Organization: NT/BNR
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 18:54:04 GMT

In article <00963596.033E9D00@vms.csd.mu.edu>, 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu writes:
|> In article <1992Nov9.083637.2339@math.ucla.edu>, rfedkiw@crenshaw.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:
|> 
|> >NFC
|> >In the lead: Dallas
|> >The rest of the pack: 2) San Fran
|> >                      3) Minnesota
|> >                      4) N.O.
|> >                      5) Philly
|> >                      6) Washington
|> >
|> >Yes, in that order......
|> >Let's hear it !
|> 
|> 
|> Not that it matters now with 7 weeks to go but I think
|> N.O. will be ahead of SF in placing as of this morning
|> (Monday) and Since Washington beat Philly head-to-head
|> they willl be ahead of Philly.
|> 
|>
AND... the "if necessary" tie-breakers will be helped by:

Wash beats @Minn (10/25)
Minn vs @Philly (12/6)
@Minn vs SF (12/13)

@SF vs Philly (11/29)

@Philly beats NO (9/13)

Dallas doesn't play the 
obvious NFCW powerhouses (NO, SF) or
""      NFCC powerhouse Minnesota. 

 
|>        *********************************
|>        *	N.Ramasubramanian      *    	    
|>        * 	                       *    
|>        *	Dept. of Mech. Engg.   *    
|>        *	Marquette University   *    
|>        *********************************

-- 
Cary W Reams | sneakers.ksh <"cary w. reams"
NT/BNR/MTXVO | TOO MANY SECRETS:> wry as a merc.   
---------------------------------------------------------------
My opinions are not necessarily shared by Northern Telecom/BNR. 
---------------------------------------------------------------
From: rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Upcoming Draft
Date: 13 Nov 92 19:16:56 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino CA, USA

In article <1992Nov13.182009.3172@ncsu.edu> mcanders@eos.ncsu.edu writes:
>Pheonix, as has been noted, is the best 3-6 team in the league. When you watch
>them it is hard to find a huge weakness. Maybe a pass rusher is needed so 
>watch for Barrow(U. of Miami), Jones(FSU), or DeBose(Notre Dame).

What Phoenix does in the draft depends a great deal on a lot of decisions
they have to make before the draft. If they stay 3-4, they need a nose
tackle(since Shurmur wants to keep Swann at End), and a inside linebacker
to team with Eric Hill(Barrow would be a good fit here). If they go 4-3,
they would still need a tackle. If they trade a guy like Nunn, then
Jones would be a good fit. They will have to decide between Chandler and
Rosenbach and the loser will probably demand a trade so they may use one
of them to get more picks. The single biggest need on the team however,
is on the offensive line, May is old, Sharpe is old and wants off the
team, and the rest of the line is adequate at best. Kennedy or somebody
else would be a nice fit too. They need a free safety too.




Russ Smith
*******************************************************************************

"What an angry clown!" -- Jerry Seinfeld

********************************************************************************
From: v050j5h4@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Steven H Todman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Seahawk fan
Date: 11 Nov 92 01:09:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


     Since a poll has been taken of Seahawk Fans, I wanted to be counted.

                                  -Steve (a frustrated fan)
From: sbs9276@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Bills best draft choices
Date: 11 Nov 92 22:20:00 GMT
Reply-To: sbs9276@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology


      BEST: Thurmon Thomas -- 3rd round b/c of injury riddled
final college year. He's missed 2 games due to injury in his career
in the NFL.

                        (oops)

      WORST: #1 pick QB Tom Cousineau-> CFL standout.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: martens@laurel.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens)
Subject: Re: Quarterback Rating
Organization: Ohio State U. Dept. of Computer Science
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 18:22:55 GMT

In article <Bx933H.Lx@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> kellejb2@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Jeff Keller) writes:
>Help!

>Does anyone out there know how to figure quarterback rating?  God knows I've
>tried, and I have no idea.  It'd be greatly appreciated.

As often as the formula gets posted, it's amazing that people keep
asking to see it.  OK, pay attention this time:  look in one of
Gary Strand's articles on current quarterback ratings.  A good
subject line to look for is:  "Week 9 & cumulative passer
ratings."

BTW:  thanks again to Gary for his weekly postings!

-- 

	Think snow!

-- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)
From: schmke@cco.caltech.edu (Kevin Todd Schmidt)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: schmidt's comp. rankings
Date: 10 Nov 1992 17:10:18 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

bd001b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (bimal ajit desai) writes:

>How on earth could any ranking system place the Eagles atop the NFL after
>last weeks loss in Dallas? I mean, I am as die-hard an Eagles fan as there
>is, but as an informed follower of the NFL, I can't understand how a 5-3
>team could possibly be ranked above a 7-1 team that had just beaten them the
>previous week. There is no question the Eagles have played one of the
>toughest schedules in the NFL (N.O., Washington, Dallas twice, Kansas City
>and Phoenix twice) but Dallas has also played a difficult schedule (the
>Eagles twice, Kansas City, Washington, New York, L.A. Raiders). Given the
>fact that Dallas and the Eagles split their games and that Dallas beat the
>Chiefs (whom the Eagles lost to), I think Dallas has to be number one (even
>though I hate to admit it). I enjoy looking at the ranking, but I have to
>wonder what criteria your program is using.
>                                -Sports Maniac

The criteria for my algorithm are where the games are played and the
final score.  My algorithm is tailored to the college game right now
so I won't claim that it is as good as can be.  Given time I will come
up with an algorithm for the pro game.

Kevin
-- 
Jet Propulsion Laboratory | schmke@cco.caltech.edu
4800 Oak Grove Dr.        | schmidt@spc5.jpl.nasa.gov
M/S 525-3684              |
Pasadena, CA  91109       |
From: eiswirth@vixvax.mgi.com (Steve Eiswirth)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Are Oilers Slumping?
Date: 10 Nov 92 11:45:58 CDT
Organization: Management Graphics, Inc.

Houston's coming to town to play the Vikes on Sunday.  What's their problem?
I've heard stories that they're having discipline/effort problems similar
to what the Jerry Burns-led Vikings had.  Also, what's with Moon and Jeffires?
Are they banged up, or are they simply slumping?  Let's get a reply from an
Oilers fan in the know.
From: iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Imran Qureshi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills D
Date: 8 Nov 92 03:06:01 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <t_trunc.13@chips.bash.edu> t_trunc@chips.bash.edu (Tursiops Truncatus) writes:

>Well,well, well! If it isn't Immy again, the Dan Quayle of r.s.f.p.!  How 
>ya' doing Immy!  You know, I really enjoy reading your stuff. You post stuff 
>that sounds *just* like statements of our soon-to-be ex-Vice President!  
>Full of humor and muddled facts.
I kind of find your articles funny too.

>In article <1992Nov6.151231.4271@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Imran Qureshi) writes:

>>The Bills defense has been quietly playing...

>Of course they've been quiet!  They're too embarassed to speak up!

>>The Bills allow 89 yds/game rushing and an astounding 3.3yds/rush!!!

>Gee, that is astounding! I didn't know they were so bad!  Too bad they can't 
>really play defense.
Excuse me, but are you a football fan.  Those numbers are pretty good for any
defense.
>>Overall, the Bills D is 12th in the NFL.

>Gee! And against powerhouses like New York, New England (twice!), Indy and 
>the Raiders!
I love the way you cut out parts of my post and totally change their meaning.
In the context of my post I mentioned that they were 5th in defensive points
allowed.
>>Secondary has given up some big plays which "distort" the stats.

>Ah, I understand!  Those plays didn't really happen! So SF didn't really 
>roll up over 500 yards offense against the Chips and Miami didn't really 
>beat them 37-10 - And the Raiders didn't really score those 20 points!!

>>if the Bills secure home field advantage in the playoffs

>"If" they secure home field advantage?  Immy, I'm surprised at you!

>>And once the offense turns "on," the Bills will probably field a team in the
>>all-time best ever in terms of talent, ability, and ....accomplishment.  

>Oh, that's rich! That really is!  One thing I like about you, Immy.  You 
>always give me a good laugh!

>But you forget the great Chips tradition of choking at the most important 
>moments - of fighting among themselves - of miserable coaching - all the 
>things that go into making a team which has the best talent in the league 
>into a bunch of losers, year after year.
Losers????  If the 2nd best record in football (by two games) is a bunch of
losers, than what exactly are winners???!!!??  According to you, there must
be 27 losers in the NFL and only 1 winner!!!  By your logic, what's so bad
about being a loser?
>>Just some thoughts......
>>Always think positive.

>OK - the Chips will POSITIVELY not be in the SuperBowl this year!

>TT

>Tursiops Truncatus 
>*************************************************************************
>GREAT MOMENTS IN BUFFALO HISTORY:  Thurmon Thomas whines about not being 
>compared to Michael Jordan before the SuperBow

At least learn how to spell Thomas's name right.

Imran Qureshi
Why do I bother even responding to this guy?

                                                                            l
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ahall@fmrco.com (Andrew Hall)
Subject: Re: I'm gonna rip Greg Gumble's head off!!!
Organization: Fidelity Management & Research Co.
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 19:26:21 GMT

In article <Nov.9.15.20.31.1992.28670@aramis.rutgers.edu> rinehart@aramis.rutgers.edu (Mark J. Rinehart) writes:
Path: fmrco!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!rinehart
   From: rinehart@aramis.rutgers.edu (Mark J. Rinehart)
   Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
   Date: 9 Nov 92 20:20:31 GMT
   References: <BxFInv.w0@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
   Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
   Lines: 33

   In article <BxFInv.w0@news.cso.uiuc.edu> mfv23060@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Maurice F. Vallejo) writes:

   > 	AAAARRRRGGGGGG,  CBS is on my shit list.  CBS shows the first 
   > half of the Cowboy/Lions and some of the third quarter.  Then all of a
   > sudden they decide to switch over to the Giant/Packers game,  cause
   > the Cowboy's had their game wrapped up.  WHAT THE HELL!!  Hello!
   > The Giants killed the Packers & CBS doesn't mention the Cowboy/Loins game
   > at all.  I waited three years for the Cowboys to get really good, and they
   > switch over to a stupid sloppy blowout.   ARRRGGGGG.  What is the address 
   > for CBS's sports?  Or better yet, what is Greg's home phone?  
   > 	If CBS is going to show a game, show it all the way through.  It is 
   > very frustrating to get into a game, and then wham-bam a different game.
   > 							Dan.



   I knew people would be pissed about that. At some point in the Giants
   game, the broadcasters said - welcome to those viewers who were
   watching the Dallas/Lions game, and I knew that game couldn't be over
   yet. I immediately thought - ya know, I'd be pissed as hell if the
   network switched from the Giants to some other game because of a
   blowout. I doubt it was Greg Gumbel's decision though, as the subject
   implies....... I don't blame you for being pissed Dan.

Actually the Packers were only down by six and marching, when CBS made the switch.

I do hate it when they do that.  I was watching the Dallas/Giants earlier this year
which they turned off when Dallas went up 31-0.  Then the Giants almost came back
with four unawnsered touchdowns.  I missed the comeback.  

At least it evened out for me, a Giants fan.

ah




=======================================================================


Bush skitters like a waterbug on the surface of things ... moving fast
 lest he linger so long that he is expected to show a mastery of, or
 even a real insterest in, anything.
                -- Conservative columnist George Will.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: tech@cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini)
Subject: Re: AFC TEAMS STINK
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 21:21:00 GMT

In article <Bxo8Fv.Drs@ns1.nodak.edu> sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan ) writes:
>of now, I agree they suck and I would consider the NFC-Championship
>game, the true Championship game.
>

I don't know how long you've been in the states, but you obviously
don't have a clue about American football. Perhaps a few more years of
watching will give you one. Until then you might consider reading more
and posting less. You are embarassing yourself.

Tony (go buffalo) Travaglini
tech@cs.ucf.edu
From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Vikes (Re: Worst/Best Trades)
Date: 12 Nov 92 02:45:11 GMT
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server

The trade for Jay Shitter isn't a best for a Raider fan, its a worst.  
Kill Al Davis now.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Organization: Houses of the Holy
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 16:06:32 GMT

In article <BILLMS.92Nov12144348@gip.eecs.umich.edu>, billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
> In article <1992Nov12.182404.10406@wam.umd.edu> emdynle@next01wor.wam.umd.edu (Em Dyn chi co' em trong tim anh) writes:
> 
>    > In article <BILLMS.92Nov9145443@gip.eecs.umich.edu>,  
>    billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>    > > In article <92314.125028JJS158@psuvm.psu.edu> JJ Serowik  
>    <JJS158@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>    > > 
>    > > Agreed.  Emmitt is king stud #1, most importantly because he does it  
>    behind
>    > > such a low quality OL.
>    >          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>    > 
>    > Yeah, right.
>    > 
>    > Brian
>    > 
> 
> 
>    I wouldn't call the OL low quality but decent.  In any case Emmitt is the  
>    man
> 
>    -Tung
> 
[Bill M-S]
> I would call your obtuseness shocking.  Given the stats this year, and any personal
> observation of the Dallas line play, I think their quality should be clear to
> all.
> 


Once again, everybody; if there is sarcasm on the net and nobody
catches on, is it still sarcasm?


-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Date: 11 Nov 1992 14:42:51 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Howard Hughes Medical Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <1992Nov10.225542.3115@lgc.com> mbs@zycor.lgc.com (Matt Shostak) writes:
>
>>5, LA Rams, Todd Lyght, cb, Notre Dame,
>
>I haven't been following too closely, but from what I've heard he's doing
>really well.

Maybe he's playing "well", but so is Maryland.  My point was somebody
who is doing "significantly better" than Maryland.  If you can't find
somebody like that, then by the original poster's standards, everybody
in the first round of that draft is a "bust".

>>13, Dallas, Alvin Harper, wr, Tennessee.
>
>Harper isn't doing well?

He's doing a good job, but I'm sure he wasn't expected to be the
top pick in the league.  Besides, he doesn't count, cuz the Cowboys
got him anyway.   :-)




Ray      GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Subject: Re: Montana throwing again...ho hum
Organization: Houses of the Holy
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 15:05:58 GMT

Did anyone hear Montana say that he would rather be a 
starter and lose 16 games than sit on the bench?  Boy,
I bet that sure did a lot for Steve Young's self respect.


-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
From: nate@ghidrah.Central.Sun.COM (Nate McConnell FE/SSE Grand Rapids, MI)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Playoff picture
Date: 9 Nov 92 11:44:29 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: nate@ghidrah.Central.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: ghidrah.central.sun.com

In article 2339@math.ucla.edu, rfedkiw@crenshaw.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:
>AFC
>In the lead: Miami, Buffalo
>The rest of the pack: 3) Denver
>                      4) Pittsburgh
>                      5) K.C.
>                      6) Houston
		       7) Cleveland

Though they will surely find a way to get out the this picture, having the
same record as the Oilers the Chiefs should at least get them a mention.

nate



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: centry@athena.mit.edu (Jae H Nam)
Subject: Re: Randall benched for WEEK TEN
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 18:11:45 GMT

>>I bet there's a ton of media hoopla about this back
>>in Philly.  What's going on here?

In article <MeyOSvG00WBO07AfVw@andrew.cmu.edu>
John Wayne Weber responds:

>HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!
>
>Cunningham got all that media for so long and what has he done!
>Cunningham is old news, lets get on with new news.
>Like:
>  Cowboys
>  Vikings
>  Steelers
>  SF
>ect.
>
>I had to listen to how great Cunningham was, now I have to listen to
>how bad he is.  Get off it!
>
>j w w

Hey, I wasn't talking to you!  I said I wanted some news
from back home in Philly.  I didn't want this HA HA nonsense.
If Cunningham is old news, then why'd you even bother to read
the post???  Read about the Cowboys, Vikes, ect. all you want.
Jeez, give me a break!

I'm in a fowl mood!!!
>:[  grrrrrrrrrrrr.....
From: cs92aja@cen.ex.ac.uk (A.J.Amsel)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Seattle Mailing List
Date: 7 Nov 92 12:32:32 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: Computer Unit. - University of Exeter. UK


As there are so many of us Seattle supporters( at least 4 now ) then
how about a mailing list so someone can tell me what the hell is going on ??





--




            
  
           AAA       LLL          EEEEEEEEE     XXX       XXX
         AA   AA     LLL          EEEEEEEEE      XXX     XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE             XXX   XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE              XXX XXX
        AAAAAAAAA    LLL          EEEEEEEEE         XXXXX
        AAAAAAAAA    LLL          EEE              XXX XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE             XXX   XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLLLLLLLL    EEEEEEEEE      XXX     XXX
       AAAA   AAAA   LLLLLLLLL    EEEEEEEEE     XXX       XXX

       - A.J.Amsel@exeter.ac.uk.cen

` And remember kids : - Incorrect use of a 
                        Fire extinguisher can 
                        seriously damage 
                        your Genitals        '

(C) Alex Amsel Designs Inc. 1992
` Beware the Ides of March - T'was the date of my birth.... '











-- 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Organization: University of Michigan
	<1dp6lfINNhtk@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>
	<1992Nov11.184416.9585@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 20:16:52 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.184416.9585@leland.Stanford.EDU> paladin@leland.Stanford.EDU (Jason Gische) writes:

   >14, Atlanta (from Indianapolis), Mike Pritchard, wr, Colorado.
	   Why did he go so low?  He's managing to shine on a team with Rison and
	   Haynes already as receivers.

Because Colorado hardly passed at all.  I was hoping the Lions would go for
him in the 2nd or 3rd round, never figuring he would go this high.  The wr
class was highly regarded, and several of them are off to a pretty promising
start, though there aren't any superstars *yet*.

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: Dallas vs. Detroit
Organization: University of Michigan
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 00:11:10 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.223238.19378@news2.cis.umn.edu> dubear@molbio.cbs.umn.edu (Dubear Kroening) writes:

   Detroit doesn't even use the run and shoot anymore, which is one of the 

The Lions never intended to fully drop the R&S, and in fact never did.  In
the end, they dropped the 'ace', which they were running about 30% of the
time.


   Final score Detroit 10, Dallas 24

The lines that I've seen are *much* closer.  Personally, I think you are
giving my team too much credit...

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
From: tennenba@tuna.cis.ohio-state.edu (craig a tennenbaum)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles #1 Quarterback
Keywords: Jimmy Mac or Randall?
Date: 10 Nov 92 00:01:06 GMT
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science

In article <Nov.9.15.29.45.1992.13475@gandalf.rutgers.edu> bstuart@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Ben Stuart) writes:
>I was just curious.  For the rest of you Eagle fans out there, who
>would you rather have starting?  I know next week is only Green Bay,
>but their defense could give Randall the confidence he needs.  On the
>other hand, Jimmy Mac earned a starting job through his leadership
>against the Raiders and a decent showing coming off the bench cold in
>the Dallas game (allbeit with modest numbers).
>
>And for the non-Eagle fans, who deserves the job?
>
>Ben

Seeing as I'n not an Eagle fan, I'll address the who deserve it.  And I've
gotta say Mac.  You don't take a winning quarterback out, so you can replace
him by a losing one.  If Randall was winning and was taken out due to an
injury, and was now coming back, I'd say the job is Randall's.  But, that's
not the case.  Granted he is a great QB, but right now he's off.  Let Mac
play if he's going to win.  That's the name of the game.

- Craig

GO DALLAS!
From: douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: For Dallas fans - I need Cowboys Schedule
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:02:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: scofflaw.douthit.721501346
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu writes:

>schedule for Dallas (With timings if you can)?


                               DALLAS COWBOYS
                         HOME STADIUM, TEXAS STADIUM

				   EST:		
Sept  7  WASHINGTON REDSKINS       8:00	
Sept 13  at New York Giants        1:00
Sept 20  PHOENIX CARDINALS         3:00
Oct   5  at Philadelphia Eagles    9:00
Oct  11  SEATTLE SEAHAWKS         12:00
Oct  18  KANSAS CITY CHIEFS       12:00
Oct  25  at Los Angeles Raiders    1:00
Nov   1  PHILADELPHIA EAGLES       3:00
Nov   8  at Detroit Lions          1:00
Nov  15  LOS ANGELES RAMS         12:00
Nov  22  at Phoenix Cardinals      2:00
Nov  26  NEW YORK GIANTS (THANKS)  3:00
Dec   6  at Denver Broncos         2:00
Dec  13  at Washington Redskins    1:00
Dec  21  at Atlanta Falcons        9:00
Dec  27  CHICAGO BEARS             3:00
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro