From: underdog@leland.Stanford.EDU (Dwight Joe)
Subject: Re: Super Power in new century and Yellow Peril
Organization: Miners for a Heart of Gold
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 02:21:12 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.185004.3371@ryn.mro4.dec.com> verma@pfeast.enet.dec.com (Virendra Verma) writes:
>In article <yQS=X_+@engin.umich.edu>, chyang@periphrasis.engin.umich.edu
>(Chung Hsiung Yang) writes...
>>	Yes, but that was the Mongolians.  The Chinese are inherently
>>isolationists and non-vilolent.  If the Chinese had intension to 

Inherently non-violent?

I nearly choked on my AISU CO^HI^ when I read that.  Mr. Yang must be a
Chinese-cu (one who is culturally Chinese).

Yang-san wa chuugokujin da yo.

>...	Oh really!! That is why China has swallowed Tabet non-violently.
>	Must thank India's Nehru who did not create any trouble, otherwise
>	the world would have known Chinese non-violent behavior.

I always wondered why the USA and other Western nations turned a blind
eye to Tibet.  This is regretable.  Tibet is likely the greatest source of
blood-letting in the last 10 years.

Last night's C-SPAN rerun of Clinton's economic summit in Arkansas confirmed
some things that most Americans already know.  Vice-president-elect Gore
mentioned that the USA should keep a close eye on China because (among
the numerous reasons cited) it is massacring Tibetans and continues to
export missile and nuclear weapons technology.

What's even more interesting than that is the fact that Mr. Yang is posting
from a Western nation, USA, and that he obviously has been exposed to
accurate Western news sources and historical accounts.  Further, Mr. Yang
is considered to be among the intellectural elite among the Chinese across the
Pacific.  Yet, _shockingly_, he would deny that China is committing any
atrocity or that it is destabilizing the world, let along East Asia.
Mr. Yang is fairly typical of Chinese-cu thought.

For this very reason, it is vital that Japan maintain a vigilant and
militarily strong jietai.  Further, Japan needs a directly elected
prime minister like the President of the USA; that prime minister can
serve as the commander-in-chief of Japanese self-defense forces.
Only a strong Japan with a commander-in-chief whose role is well-defined
in an amended Japanese Kempoo can protect Asia from Chinese hegemony.

In the very likely event that China terrorizes another nation (like possibly
the Republic of Taiwan in the future), that Japanese prime minister
can, with the cooperation of the USA, successfully direct its military forces
to send the Chinese armies to Almighty God.

Of course, Japan can do certain things to postpone the day when Chinese armies
are sent back to their Creator.  For example, weakening China politically would
be one route; this can be accomplished by using Japanese (and American)
financial and political leverage to force the secession of Manchuria as
an independent nation whose official language would be Japanese or English.
Manchuria could then be renamed to somethng like "Shinkoku", and the people
would be called "Shinkoku-jin".

There are other possibilities, of course.

>	And what about one million girls killed, non-violently of course,
>	in the name of population control?

That's not quite correct.  The Chinese-cu gov't is actually opposed to
infanticide, but the population at large supports it.  In the first half
of this century, 1 million (I can cite a reference) Chinese died from
disease, famine, and infanticide.  Some of the girls were strangled
by their very own parents.

Infanticide continues to occur frequently in China.  In fact, local
authorities (in recurring articles in the San Francisco Chronicle) have
been trying to teach those "loving" parents that female infants are
just as important as male infants.  I suspect that the efforts of the
authorities are totally in vain.

(By the way, I cross-posted this to soc.culture.asian.american to let
some people know that I am not the only one who is aware that millions
of Chinese infant girls have been murdered by their very own parents.)

Have a nice day.
------------------------------------------------------------------+------------
Jinsei no imi wa nan desu ka.                Sister, can you      |   \|  |`
Shitte itara oshiete kuremasen ka.           spare a coin?        |    | -+-
                                                                  |   /| / \
Copyright 1992.  Disclaimer:  1 + 1 = 3                           |
------------------------------------------------------------------+------------
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA