HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ad207@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Brett Kollar)
Subject: Re: Monitoring Times info needed
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 20:51:27 GMT


Monitoring Times
P.O. Box 98
Brasstown, NC  28902

1 year $19.95
2 year $38.00
3 year $56.00

1-800-438-8155

-- 
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: jb@dubdtp.dbo.dec.com 
Subject: WANTED - Info on AR2000
Reply-To: Jonathan Bradshaw@dbo.mts.dec.com 
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 15:19:00 GMT


         Can anyone give me any information on the AR2000?

         info on the scanner or an address for the company who
         make it...

         Thanks
         Jonathan

--
Jonathan Bradshaw, European Operations Platforms Group
		   Digital Equipment Ireland Ltd.
                                       My employer can express his own views!
From: rdale@cstp.umkc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Thank you
Date: 30 Aug 92 02:01:48 GMT
Organization: UM - Kansas City, Computer Science


	A few days ago I posted a request for auto racing frequencies,
	specifically the Parnass list.  Someone was kind enough to
	e-mail that list to me, and I wish to thank him.  I sent a
	thank you, but it was bounced back as undeliverable.
From: Monty@vnet.ibm.com (Bryan Montgomery)
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 10:46:07 BST
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Scrambling ?? / Yupiteru MVT-7000
Reply-To: Monty@vnet.ibm.com
Organization: IBM Havant UK
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0
            <1992Sep4.092347.8277@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>

In <1992Sep4.092347.8277@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Mark A. Day (N4OQK writes:
>Ah, a most excellent hack! I havent seen the inversion technique used in
>years. As a teenager, I remember my friends father reaching behind his
>Bearcat 8 channel (Crystal) scanner to "flip the switch"!
>
>--

Mark,
      could you share any details with us? Besides the Ramsey kit (which
sounds reasonably priced, does anyone else have (more specific) details
of the 'hack'?

BTW according to my manual YUPITERU Industries Ltd can be reached at
                           12-33 shibaura 4-chome
                           Minato-ku
                           Tokyo 108
                           Japan (sorry no numbers!)

A UK dealer dealing with Yupiteru/AOR/SONY/Optoelectronics etc,
their address is 22 Main Road   Fax +44 702 205843
                 Hockley        Tel +44 702 206835/204965
                 Essex
                 SS5 4QS
Cheers,

       From
               Bryan Montgomery  ( Production Engineer )


 Tel : +44 (705) / (0705) 486363 Extn 8593          Mail Point 32/21
 Fax : +44 (705) / (0705) 664431                    IBM Havant
 Tie : 721 - 8593                                   Havant
 Internet : Monty@Vnet.IBM.com                      Hampshire, PO9 1SA
 VNET     : BRYANM at HVTVM4                        Great Britain
From: b1y1m39@kato.BELL-ATL.COM (Bob Esposito)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: PRO-43
Date: 28 Aug 92 17:07:10 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Bell Atlantic

In article <1992Aug28.104236.9743@uoft02.utoledo.edu> cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
> 
>> BTW, the modification to restore 30-88 MHz and cellular coverage
>> outlined in September 1992 Monitoring Times works but is not for the
>> faint of heart.
>
>Yessir.  I had an 'expert' do it for me.  No way I would try that by myself.  I
>had the celluar mod done first, and then the extended VHF-Lo done again (2
>desolder and resolder jobs)  I would advise that anybody who wants both jobs
>done that they have both done at the same time.  The celluar is relatively easy
>(clip the diode) compared to the VHF-Lo mod (moving and resoldering the diode).
>The unit is not made to be continuously desoldered and resoldered.
>
>-- 
>
>			- Brad Steinman
>                          cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo


	I believe I saw an article just recently that mentioned
	using the diode from the cellular restoration mod.
	It mentioned unsoldering that diode and installing it
	for the extended VHF-Lo.


-- 
======================================================================
Bob Esposito                       Voice/Voice Mail:    (215) 466-6831
Bell Atlantic Corp.                             FAX:    (215) 563-3984
Philadelphia, Pa.                    E-mail: b1y1m39@kato.BELL-ATL.COM
From: b_cobb@hannah.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Need handheld scanner with guts
Date: 24 Aug 92 14:04:46 GMT
Reply-To: b_cobb@hannah.enet.dec.com ()
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


Where can I get information on Yupiteru scanners?  I see that 
the MVT 7000 is mentioned here a number of times.  Any info on this?

-- 
Name:    Bill Cobb
E-Mail:  cobb@hannah.enet.dec.com
Phone:   508.635.8458
Address: MS DSG1-2/E6
         Digital Equipment Corporation
         4 Technology Park Drive
         Westford, MA  01886

  
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: smunday@vtssi.vt.EDU (Sherrod Munday)
Subject: Mods on BCXLT100?
Organization: The Ohio State University Department of Computer and Information Science
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 20:11:00 GMT

After reading a lot about scanner mods for the PRO- series, I am wondering
if there are any books or references about mods to Uniden scanners.
Specifically, I have a BC100XLT and am wondering what can be done to improve
coverage range, number of channels, etc., and also how specifically to do
it.

Replies can be either to this conference or directly to my e-mail address:

smunday@vtssi.vt.edu

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
--Sherrod Munday
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: retzer@convex.csd.uwm.edu (Joe J Retzer)
Subject: Antenna for FM broadcast and Scanner
Originator: retzer@convex.csd.uwm.edu
Reply-To: retzer@convex.csd.uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 01:04:57 GMT

Just wondering if anyone has tried this (or knows of an antenna that 
will accomplish the job). Specifically I was considering replacing my
FM radio antenna with one which will handle the radio as well as
the scanner. This should save alot of time and trouble taking the
mag mount in and out of the trunk. 

		   Thanks much in advance,
			
			    Joe Retzer
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: CCMG <CCMG@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA>
Subject: Scanner
Organization: McGill University
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 14:42:49 GMT


Hi im interested in buying a scanner to here police activity
from RADIO SHACK...which do you recommend? Price?

Thank You

Giovanni
From: GORDON@UKCEVM1.VNET.IBM.COM (Gordon C Smith, IBM Greenford, UK. (730 X4352))
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 11:35:57 BST
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Test
Reply-To: GORDON@UKCEVM1.VNET.IBM.COM

Test transmission

Disclaimer: Any opinion detected in this posting is not that of IBM.
News-Software: Usenet 3.0
X-X-From: Gordon Smith

Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: mperlman@nyx.cs.du.edu (Marshal "Airborne" Perlman)
Subject: Re: Scanning on aircraft
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 92 00:28:36 GMT

tvervaek@col.hp.com (Tom Vervaeke) writes:

>I'm a private pilot and I always take my scanner (a Pro-34) up when 
>flying. I don't own my own plane so must rent by the hour. If a radio
>or two fails I like having the scanner. It has even come in handy
>on a few occasions. I've never noticed any adverse affects on the
>aircraft and I've got it sitting right on the right seat only a few
>feet away from all the instruments and radions. Just my 2 cents worth.
> 
>I've used my scanner on sommercial flights before with no problems. Of
>course, I used a headphone like a Sony Walkman's and keep the scanner
>tucked away.

WELL..being that we are bot pilots..we both know:

Well..I don't consider a broken com an EMERGENCY <still dangerous tho>,
but under an EMERGENCY..anything goes...
--
Generic Signature:
Marshal Perlman - Huntington Beach - California - USA - Earth - Milky Way
yaW ykliM - htraE - ASU - ainrofilaC - hcaeB notgnitnuH - namlreP lahsraM
                                                        :erutangiS cireneG
Xref: sparky alt.radio.scanner:1733 rec.radio.amateur.misc:14834
From: drawson@sagehen.Tymnet.COM (Dick Rawson)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: AR-1500 battery size update
Keywords: AOR AR-1500
Date: 1 Sep 92 18:52:00 GMT
Followup-To: alt.radio.scanner
Organization: BT North America (Tymnet)

> I have been reluctant to make my own replacements by the soldering
> method, because I recognise that my soldering skills are not brilliant,
> and I understand that NiCad cells can explode with excessive heat.

Better to avoid soldering to the end terminals; the recommended method
is welding, believe it or not!  A commercial electronics supplier
(rather than a consumer-oriented store) should be able to supply AA
NiCad cells with solder tabs already welded on, from which you can
build up a battery pack:  you solder to the tabs, or solder two tabs to
each other.  I've done this years ago; works fine.  If clearances in
the radio are tight, the result may not fit:  the soldered tabs may be
too bulky.

Or check with hams and ham-radio magazines.  In the USA there are
several small outfits selling replacement battery inserts for popular
handi-talkies and scanners; many will make up any pack you can
describe, although they may not have the necessary connector for some
internal (as opposed to slide-on) packs.  I just connect the leads and
connector to the new pack in that situation.  Some of these outfits
sell entire alternative battery packs for the most popular HTs, such as
the ICOM 2AT/02AT family; they either cost less, or offer different
voltages or energies, than the OEM does.  I imagine, but don't know,
that these folks may stock fresher nicads than general electronics
suppliers do, because of the turnover.

I buy from E. H. Yost & CO. ("Mr. Nicad") 608-643-3194; I haven't made
up my own packs from cells in several years now.  In Australia, look
for someone similar.

Dick Rawson, N6CMJ
From: bgh@vnet.ibm.com (Brian Harper)
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 08:27:20 EDT
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Mods for Pro-34
Reply-To: bgh@vnet.ibm.com
Organization: IBM High Bandwidth Systems
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0

In <1992Sep4.120916.26249@crd.ge.com> Scott Van Nostrand writes:
>Can someone please post (or email) the mods for receiving cell
>freqs on my Pro-34?  Scan speed? More channels?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>+   Scott Van Nostrand            +        This space         +
>+   GE Technical Communications   +       intentionally       +
>+   Schenectady, NY               +        left blank.        +
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>+    vannostrand@tbosch.dnet.ge.com     (518)-385-2916        +
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>

I am interested in the same information.

Reply-To: bgh@vnet.ibm.com

Brian G. Harper (bgh@vnet.ibm.com)
IBM Corporation
Research Triangle, NC
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: scannon@bluemoon.rn.com (Sam Cannon)
Subject: Yaesu FRG-9600 ### CAT Programs Sought
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[024])
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 23:41:50 EDT

If anyone knows where I can get a C or BASIC program for
controlling a Yaesu FRG9600, please drop me a note. I've
seen Kenwood stuff and others, but NOTHING for the 
FGR9600.  Thanks a BUNCH for any help.  73.

 
scannon@bluemoon.rn.com      --------------------------------------------
sam@resource.com              The Eupsychian Network - Abraham H. Maslow
CMHC Systems, Inc.           --------------------------------------------
                                           
              "Support Mental Health or I'll kill you"
 
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: johnr@mik.uky.edu (john s roberts)
Subject: KENTUCKY: Frequency Lists?
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 12:05:46 GMT
Distribution: ky

I would appreciate it if anyone could send me or tell me where to get frequency lists
for scanners.  I have the capability to receive 118Mhz to 178Mhz.  I have looked at
the radio shack book, however found it to be a little lacking in specifics.  How about
mobile telephone frequencies in the 150-160Mhz section?  Thanks for your help!

John
--
      --==+  John S. Roberts, Jr.     Internet: johnr@mik.uky.edu  +==-- 
      --==+  3466 Flintridge Drive         NeXT Mail Enjoyed       +==--
      --==+  Lexington, Kentucky      Home: (606) 272-1417         +==--
      --==+  40517-1119               Work: (606) 257-6100         +==--
From: bp12+@andrew.cmu.edu (Brian J. Papa)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: freq. counter & Scanning
Date: 2 Sep 92 15:14:58 GMT
Organization: Senior, Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


Has anyone out there used a handheld frequency counter while at an
emergency scene or outdoor event (regatta, festival, auto race, etc)? 
How do they perform?  I am primarily interested in using them to find
out new frequencies (I assume this is one of the only things that you
can use them for not on the test bench)

Do you have any particular brands that you think are better/more cost
effective than others?  Particularly, I am looking at the low-end
Opto-electronics handhelds for future purchase (Christmas is coming soon)

Thanks for any info.

-Brian
From: justin@m2xenix.psg.com (Justin Norman)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Freqs WU
Date: 4 Sep 92 03:09:46 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Pacific Systems Group, Portland Oregon US

Does any one have freqs for Willamette University in Salem, OR??
There are none listed in my book but I know at least
campus safety uses one or more freqs.  

Please don't follow up!!  email instead!
 
thanks

justin@psg.com
jnorman@willamette.edu
Justin.Norman@dawggon.fidonet.org
Baxter Scientific Products Division
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: zimmer@gumby.cc.wmich.edu (Roy Zimmer)
Subject: Uniden Bearcat BC200XLT scanner info sought
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 17:24:14 GMT
Organization: Western Michigan University
Distribution: usa

I'm considering the purchase of the scanner mentioned in the subject line
above.  Does anyone have anything good or bad to say about this?  
As I don't normally access this group, please respond to my email address.
Thanks,

Roy Zimmer at:   zimmer@gw.wmich.edu

Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave
From: frenchs@forsan.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: PRO-2005/6 Difference(s)
Date: 26 Aug 92 14:13:30 GMT
Reply-To: frenchs@forsan.enet.dec.com ()
Distribution: na
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


RE:

; I was wondering if anybody could please enlighten me on the difference(s)
; between the Realistic PRO-2005 and PRO-2006 scanners. Thank you kindly in
; advance.

As I believe it the PRO-2006 has more memories and a faster scan rate.


Does anyone have the PRO-2005 mod to increase the scan rate.

Simon
From: calley@optilink.UUCP (Chris Calley)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Scanning on aircraft
Date: 1 Sep 92 23:48:13 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA


I recently took a flight from San Francisco to Minneapolis, accompanied by my
trusty Pro-34.  I enjoy listening to the various comms in the airport and on
flights.  A pre-flight announcement stated that all radios, tvs, and cellular
phones were prohibited.  Upon speaking to a flight attendant, I was told that
this was only while on the ground, and that once airborn, I could use my 
scanner.  The reason being that these devices could possibly effect the 
aircraft navigation and/or communication systems.  I have a couple of
questions:
	1. Do scanners transmit?  If not, how could they possibly effect
		anything on an aircraft?
	2. If they can effect aircraft instrumentation on the ground, why not
		also in the air?
	3. What does the law/regulation actually say about using radios on
		aircraft?	
	
	
Any info appreciated.


		
-- 
Christopher A. Calley - all opinions are my own... etc.
email: 	calley@optilink.com
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: eoliver@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au (Eddie Oliver)
Subject: Re: AR-1500 battery size update
Keywords: AOR AR-1500
Organization: Macquarie University, Australia.
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 02:07:12 GMT

In article <schro.715242363@nessos> schro@nessos.sni.de (W.F.Schroeder) writes:
>
>The unit comes with a NiCad pack made of 5 AA(!) size cells, soldered
>together and shrink-wrapped in white plastic.  Capacity is 600mAh at 6
>volts.  The cell pack has a short cable with a tiny plug to connect it
>to the receiver. 

This is reminiscent of some of the Bearcat scanners. It can be quite
difficult here in Australia to get the battery packs replaced when they
fail (as they do). 

I have been reluctant to make my own replacements by the soldering method,
because I recognise that my soldering skills are not brilliant, and I
understand that NiCad cells can explode with excessive heat. So my question is -
just how dangerous is it to solder NiCad's? Can one really do it safely
just with reasonable care, or is it genuinely dangerous?

Eddie Oliver
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: retzer@convex.csd.uwm.edu (Joe J Retzer)
Subject: Frequency Counters
Originator: retzer@convex.csd.uwm.edu
Reply-To: retzer@convex.csd.uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 00:24:19 GMT

I was considering the purchase of a frequency counter and had 
narrowed it down to 2 models:

	  (1) Optoelectronics Model 2810, Sale Price $199.00
	  (2) Startek BG-15, Sale Price $169.95


Does anyone have any info as to how these two differ? and/or
Which is a better unit?

			 Thanks in Advance,
			    Joe Retzer N9QXL

====================================================================
			      
By the way, the Startek is advertised in the Sept. QST from AES.
The top line reads:
	             "In Stock at AES"

What they really mean is:
	             "In Stock at AES" .........  NOT

I made the trip to the Milw. Store on 8/31 only to find they were out 
of stock.
From: drw@esl.com (Dave Waters)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Scanning on aircraft
Date: 3 Sep 92 00:18:21 GMT
Followup-To: alt.radio.scanner
Distribution: usa
Organization: ESL Inc.

In article <pc11usk@fido.asd.sgi.com>, jeffg@loki.esd.sgi.com (Jeff C.
Glover) wrote:

> Yes, even if the pilot says it's OK, it's not OK.  Read that last
> paragraph carefully -- "OPERATOR" != "PILOT" for most commercial
> flights.  And it doesn't say diddly about the OPERATOR assigning that
> responsibility to the PILOT.  That is, United Airlines can't allow it's
> pilots to determine on the spot whether a device is legit or not; they
> (United Airlines) have to determine FOR A PARTICULAR PIECE OF EQUIPMENT
> and FOR A PARTICULAR AIRCRAFT ON WHICH IT WILL BE ALLOWED.

I would venture to guess that in most cases, the pilot could reasonably
be expected to be an agent of the "operator". I think you're right, that
an individual is reasonably covered if the PIC says OK.
Thanks for posting the actual regs, it seems to be crystal clear.
Unfortunately for us radio-types.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Waters
WA6AWZ
E-mail: drw@esl.com or 73277.311@compuserve.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: johnw@bluemoon.rn.com (John L. Wilkerson Jr.)
Subject: Re: The NEW RS PRO-39 handheld
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[024])
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 92 10:09:00 EDT

johnm@hpmcaa (John Mosbarger) writes:

>      Does anyone make carrying cases for RS scanners?  I've always thought 
> that was one glaring omission from their list of accessories.
> 
  
   Try a 20-004  "Protective Carrying case"  It is more or less made for 
the RS Walkie-talkies, but it is listed in the sacnner section too.   
Tthat may do the job for you.
 

|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| John L. Wilkerson Jr.     | johnw@bluemoon.uucp    | "A realist in a   |
|                           | johnw@bluemoon.rn.com  |  cruel world that |
|Sysop: EastSide Connection | jwilkerson@delphi.com  | wishes to destroy |
| (CoCo) (614) 755-2492     |------------------------|       me"         |
|   SkyNet Node: 1/2                                                     |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: mad@Turing.ORG (Mark A. Day (N4OQK))
Subject: Propogation mediums
Keywords: Propogation, DX
Organization: The Turing Project, Charlottesville Virginia.
Distribution: USA
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 09:14:56 GMT

Here in the Piedmont of Virginia, with the Atlantic ocean to our east, and
the Blue Ridge mountains to our west, thermal inversions are frequent. As a 
lot of you may know, this causes the VHF/UHF propogation medium known as
ducting. Radio waves propogate down the duct, bouncing off the "walls" all
the way. I sit here tonite listening to police from DC and Richmond, DC is
around 160 miles away, and Richmond is around 100. I have had nites when the
propogation is so strong, Ive actually heard cellular data channels from these
areas. Police are making use of 800Mhz trunked systems in these areas also, so
the scanning can be quite intense. 

My fathest DX so far was from Raleigh NC on 460.250 (Is this a common freq 
or WHAT!) over 250 miles away. Ive also copied Nags Head Police, which is 
about the same distance as the crow flies.  I also like listening to the old 
nationwide Air Force One frequency (415.700) as it still seems to be fairly 
active here. When I have the propogation to DC, I can hear both sides of the 
full-duplex conversation.

Do any of you have this kind of propogation where you live, or do you get 
propogation from any other medium (Meteor scatter, Sporadic E, etc) ???


-- 
________________________________________________________________________

| Mark A. Day  Hardware Technician, Sawkill Engineering, Inc.		|	
| USMail  1612 Rickey Road Charlottesville VA 22901  			|
|									|
| Email   mad@Turing.ORG			Radio N4OQK@WA4TFZ	|
| 						UUCP: mad@Malochai.UUCP |
________________________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: evansg@uproar.enet.dec.com (Gwyn Evans @ IME)
Subject: Re: Scanning on aircraft
Reply-To: evansg@uproar.enet.dec.com (Gwyn Evans @ IME)
Organization: Digital Equipment Service Industries Solutions Company Ltd
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 10:13:28 GMT


In article <1992Sep3.000134.11095@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>,
billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:
>
>jeffg@loki.esd.sgi.com (Jeff C. Glover) writes:
>: 
>: Replace "Radio" in all the above with "Any Electronic Device", and you
>: also exclude computers, NES gameboy, CD Players, etc.  Most airlines
>: have issued "determination" results for laptops and cd players.
>
>Yep, I have noticed that they seem to be allowed. It is funny, my laptop
>creates more rfi than all my other equipment put together.
>
>Bill
>

 Well, from F.A.R 91.19 ...

    'Portable electronic devices not acceptable:

    * Telephones
    * radios
    * electronic games with remote controls

    and,....

    * data entry PAD that are hand held, with umbilical attached.'

 That sounds as if they're expecting laptops without any mice, etc, plugged
in to possibly be acceptable!

Gwyn
--
+======================================================================+
| Gwyn Evans  | evansg@uproar.enet.dec.com |  Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK  |
| DESISCo - Digital Equipment Service Industries Solutions Company Ltd |
|  Views expressed and statements made are mine and not those of DEC   |
+======================================================================+