HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: damien@erich.triumf.ca (DAMIEN GALLOP)
Subject: Re:  CGA on Hercules Monochrome?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: TRIUMF: Tri-University Meson Facility
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 06:54:00 GMT

In article <1992Aug28.213106.17603@ucselx.sdsu.edu>, palsson@ucselx.sdsu.edu (Jerry Palsson) writes...
>Hope this isn't a boring old FAQ, but can some kind soul tell me if
>there is a utility that will let me run CGA/EGA (etc.) games using a
>Hercules monochrome graphics card?  This is for an XT with DOS 5.0.

	HGCIBM.COM	works very well for me. Also,
	SIMCGA.COM	will do the job.

>I'm familiar with most of the good ftp sites, so just want to know which
>filenames to look for.  Thanks...
> 

	I bought these from a shareware source (Florida PC Library).

	While I'm at it, ARRMOUSE works very well to add mouse support for
just about anything. Available at Cica, if I recall. Like HGCIBM and SIMCGA,
implement ARRMOUSE with batch files.

					All the best. Damien

email: damien@reg.triumf.ca
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Let's start a DR-DOS newsgroup- All in favor- say aye!
Date: 30 Aug 92 02:37:50 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

In article <27800023@hpuamsa.neth.hp.com>, franks@hpuamsa.neth.hp.com (Frank Slootweg CRC) writes:
>   First of all: I'm a big DR DOS 6.0 fan.
> 
>   However I'm not sure whether or not I want a seperate DR DOS group/
> hierarchy.

I'm a fan too.  Anyway, on the BBS-based RIMEnet, a separate DR DOS
echomail conference exists.  It has had no trouble with low traffic.
Most of the queries deal with the specific DR DOS utilities like
EMM386, SSTOR, SUPERPCK, FILELINK, etc., or with compatibility
questions.

I think it's time to make a decision.  If one of you has the time, disk
space and inclination to handle voting for a comp.os.drdos, I hope
you can get us on the road to a separate DR DOS newsgroup.   I believe
news.groups is where you can find info on how to start a new group....
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."
From: bergman@panix.com (Mark Bergman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: MKS Toolkit (Was: Re: TAR.EXE for MS DOS Problems ... help!)
Date: 2 Sep 92 05:46:13 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC

In article <1992Aug31.032848.4818@news.uakron.edu> x1gsd@VAX1.CC.UAKRON.EDU (Gregory S Delozier) writes:
>I, like many others, work with Unix all day, and develop DOS software
>in my spare time. I'd like to use unix tools on my DOS system, like
>a decent shell, the usual utilities and so forth. In reading this
>group, I notice that mention has been made of the 'tar' clone in the MKS
>toolkit as a solution to 'tar' problems. I'd like to hear some opinions
>about the MKS Toolkit ---  
>	Is it worth the money?
YES, yes, yes. Absolutely.

>	Are the Unix-like tools good emulations?
Terriffic. They have their bugs, but by and large they are
excellent. Everything is POSIX compliant, with some minor
DOS extensions.

>	Does is critically reduce the space available to DOS programs?
>		(i.e. is the shell huge?)
The shell is larger than command.com, but the memory
management has gotten to be very good, particularly under
DOS 5.0. I get ~620K free on a 486 with a mouse driver, disk
cache, and ansi driver--using DOS 5, QEMM, and the MKS
shell. Most of the shell resides in upper memory and is
swapped out on demand.

>	Is there a cheaper way do get the same results? 
Cheaper for individual utilities...yes. Cheaper for the same
results, no.
>...and just general experiences with it...
>
Mail me for more info.

>Is there maybe a mailing list for the MKS Toolkit or users?
Now that's a great idea. There should also be an MKS FAQ.
>Finally, is MKS on the net or email anywhere?
inquiry@mks.com
>
>Thanks!
>
>-greg
>
>


I've used the Toolkit for ~4 years. It has some bugs, and
MKS is honest and helpful, though less than blazingly fast
in correcting problems that seem to be fairly simple. I have
no other connection except as an individual, very satisfied
user.

----
Mark Bergman
718-855-9148

bergman@panix.com
{cmcl2,psi,uunet,apple}!panix!bergman
From: crow@coos.dartmouth.edu (Preston F. Crow)
Newsgroups: in.pc,comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Reboot a PC from a batch file.
Date: 28 Aug 92 23:20:22 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

I missed the original post, but you could have your .BAT file call a .COM
file and write a short program to reboot the computer.  By "short
program," I mean 5 bytes.  I don't remember exactly, but I believe that
all you need is to assemble "JMP FFFF:0000."  You could use debug or sid
to determine what the code for that form of JMP instruction is.
I think it's EA, but I'm not sure.

--PC


--
   "Everything is permissible"--but not everything is beneficial.
   "Everything is permissible"--but not everything is constructive.
                                                      --I Corinthians 10:23
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: joet@dcatlas.dot.gov (Joe Trott)
Subject: Re: Norton Utilities Calibrate
Organization: U.S Dept. of Transportation
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 20:15:12 GMT

skhan@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Shahab Raza Khan) writes:

>Does anyone know what happens if calibrate says that my disk
>is not mapped propermy.  It is called a disk mapping error
>and it refuses to continue with calibrat.

>The disk I have is an IDE drive and is a 50m drive.
>It is not running stacker or any of that sort of programs.

>Can anyone help me out.

IDE drives employ a sector translation scheme; they have an actual format
that is usually something like 36 or 53 sectors/track, but the controller
translates this to 17 sectors/track with a higher-than-actual cylinder
count.
Since CALIBRAT has to know the _exact_ _actual_ hardware parameters in order
to do a low level format, it cannot run with this (or any other) kind of
sector translation scheme in place.

-JTT
From: ardtlong@adam.adelaide.edu.au (Dale T. Long)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Help Needed With Qbasic
Date: 31 Aug 92 05:04:52 GMT


        I am using Qbasic, the one that comes with Microsoft DOS 5.00 for the
IBM PC. I have a problem in that the space allocated for strings is only
8000 bytes. In the old GWbasic I would have done a CLEAR xxx to free up xxx
amount of bytes. However Qbasic only has the ability to clear the stack using
CLEAR ,,xxx . Paramaters before the first two commas don't do a thing. Is there
a way to allocate more string space? I am using a two dimensional dynamic
string array. Help indicates that individual strings can be up to 32767 bytes
long but I can't even have a single string longer than the 8000 byte limit.
Help also says that a string array can be up to 64K in size. Is there any way
to over come this problem? Is the Qbasic (interpreter) just a sales pitch
that makes people need to buy the full Quick Basic (compiler) out of neccesity?
Has anyone else had this problem? How do I increase the amount of string space
from 8000 bytes?

Dale Long.
ardtlong@adam.adelaide.edu.au
From: rwilliam@bach.helios.nd.edu (richard williams)
Newsgroups: in.pc,comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Missing character questions....
Date: 3 Sep 92 16:06:49 GMT
Organization: University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame

In article <Bu0CD5.5ry@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> rcbaker@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Bob Baker) writes:
>While working on converting some VERY old DOS files at work, we've
>discovered an interesting dilemma.  When we do a directory listing of
>the files, we see things like:
>
>H FRAME   TXT   09-01-84  etc., etc.
>S H HOUS  TXT   09-01-84
>.
>Our problem comes when we want to copy these files to other disks.
>Whatever character the blank space is in the directory listing, it
>does not get read in the copy program.  We see:

Usually you can get around a problem like this by using wildcards or
by using some sort of DOS shell.  Try this:

Copy H?frame.txt hframe.txt   or else maybe
copy H?frame?.txt hframe.txt

Basic and other programs can create file names with spaces in them, but
then regular Dos can't handle them, except as above.  The filename might
also include some weird nonprinting character.  

If this doesn't work, you might also run chkdsk or else the Norton Disk
Doctor, especially if on old floppies the disk might have gotten a
little zapped somehow.

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, N.D. Sociology Department         Office:   (219)239-6668
BITNET:    F67TEL@IRISHMVS                          Messages: (219)239-6463
INTERNET:  F67TEL@IRISHMVS.CC.ND.EDU                FAX:      (219)239-8209
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: gmribeir@david.wheaton.edu (Glauber)
Subject: Re: MKS Toolkit (Was: Re: TAR.EXE for MS DOS Problems ... help!)
Organization: (n.) Body of persons united for a specific purpose.
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 13:08:28 GMT

>In article <1992Aug31.032848.4818@news.uakron.edu>
x1gsd@VAX1.CC.UAKRON.EDU (Gregory S Delozier) writes:
>	Is there a cheaper way do get the same results? 

	You can get the same results using free softwhare, but
you have to work more.


>Finally, is MKS on the net or email anywhere?

	toolkit@mks.com


					Glauber



-- 
Glauber Ribeiro - Wheaton College, IL  (USA)
                  glauber@david.wheaton.edu 
                  glauber@vpnet.chi.il.us
Newsgroups: in.pc,comp.os.msdos.misc
From: rcbaker@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Bob Baker)
Subject: Missing character questions....
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 15:00:41 GMT

While working on converting some VERY old DOS files at work, we've
discovered an interesting dilemma.  When we do a directory listing of
the files, we see things like:

H FRAME   TXT   09-01-84  etc., etc.
S H HOUS  TXT   09-01-84
.
.
.

Our problem comes when we want to copy these files to other disks.
Whatever character the blank space is in the directory listing, it
does not get read in the copy program.  We see:

HFRAME.TXT - File not found
0 files copied

For whatever reason, DOS removes the character that appears in the
directory, and we are unable to copy our files (let alone read them,
delete them, rename them, etc.).

Has anyone seen this problem before?  Better yet, does any one have a
solution as to how to fix it?

Thanks for your time,
Bob
-- 
         //////////////////////////////////////
         / Bob Baker, struggling undergrad..../
         / rcbaker@silver.ucs.indiana.edu     /
         //////////////////////////////////////
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Subject: Re: Unstacking Stacked Disks
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 23:58:45 GMT
Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc.

jeff@ryhope.del.dec.com (Jeff Finkelstein) writes:

>Does anyone know how to unstack a disk stacked with STACKER 2.0?

Yes.  Backup, then restore.  You should already have a backup anyway
(right??).  :)

>The problem, of course, is to do it on the same device without copying it to
>another disk.

It could be done, but not quickly.  Run SDEFRAG/G to shrink the stacker
drive as small as possible.  Then copy as much as you can off the drive
onto the uncompressed part.  Then run SDEFRAG/G again and shrink the
drive some more.  Repeat until finished.  This is pretty much the
inverse of the INSTALL operation, but it is not automated.

A backup/restore would take less time.

-- 
#ifdef TRUE         | Fuzzy Fox                  fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0   | a.k.a. David DeSimone      an207@cleveland.freenet.edu
#define  FALSE  1   |
#endif              |         How's my posting?  Call 1-800-ALT-FLAME
From: hippo@sonoma.edu (Michel Davidoff)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: EMM386 Execption Error # 12
Date: 4 Sep 92 15:42:24 GMT
Organization: Sonoma state university

When I run marknet and relnet I often get the message 
Emm386 Ececption error # 12 P
And then my system halts. I think that the p is the begining of 
a parity error.
I looked in the DOS 5.0 manual and there is no clue to 
what the error is.
Help ????

Michel Davidoff
From: rwilliam@bach.helios.nd.edu (richard williams)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: CONFIG.SYS tactics
Date: 29 Aug 92 22:38:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Aug29.223803.24744
Organization: University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame

In article <fzfbe-bz@clmqt.marquette.MI.US> traal@clmqt.marquette.MI.US (Brian Phillips) writes:
>In <hurd.714863125@sfu.ca> hurd@fraser.sfu.ca (Peter L. Hurd) writes:
>
>
>>>> - (i.e. Can I redirect CONFIG.SYS output to a file?)
>
>>As a DOS moron, let me suggest a pause statement very early on in your
>>Autoexec.bat.  Time waster when booting you say, less time wasting that
>>fiddling around with reading a piped output I say.
>
>Of course, the question was how to direct CONFIG.SYS to a file, not pause
>the AUTOEXEC.BAT file.  RTFM, or in this case, RTFQ.
>
>  --Traal the BRAVE 
>--
Try the suggestion out before you criticize it.  By putting a pause in
autoexec.bat, you will most likely be able to see whatever it was that was
output by config.sys.  (Unless there was more than one screenful of output).
This same tip appears in PC Mag this month (or maybe PC computing).
Sending it to a file isn't necessary if all you want to do is see what the
messages said, sending it to a file is just another way of meeting the
original poster's goal but the pause tip will probably work as well.




--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, N.D. Sociology Department         Office:   (219)239-6668
BITNET:    F67TEL@IRISHMVS                          Messages: (219)239-6463
INTERNET:  F67TEL@IRISHMVS.CC.ND.EDU                FAX:      (219)239-8209
From: gest_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Gavin Stark)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Looking for technical references.
Date: 3 Sep 92 20:30:30 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York


I am doing a research project on the history of DOS (in all its varieties,
forms, etc) What I am looking for are references on both the historical
aspects and operating systems details of DOS. (how does the program
scheduler work, what algorithm does the memory manager use, etc.)  Please do
not send me your technical explanations but point me to a good
(documentable) resource.

Thank you,
Gavin Stark

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________________
Gavin Stark          gest_ss@troi.cc.rochester.edu      University of Rochester
"But alienation's for the rich and I'm a-feelin' poorer every day." - TMBG
From: sph0301@utsph.sph.uth.tmc.edu (Kate Wilson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: HELP! EMM386 won't work!
Date: 4 Sep 1992 12:59:28 GMT
Organization: Univ. of Texas School of Public Health

In article <1992Sep4.082218.26350@nntp.hut.fi> tsand@vipunen.hut.fi (Tapio Sand) writes:
>In article <13617.2aa4cc37@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu> colovas@ohstpy.mps.
ohio-state.edu writes:>>I have a new 486/33 and I'm trying to load things 
into high/expanded memory,>>but I'm having problems. when I load EMM386, it 
gives me a message that>>expanded memory services are unavailable. does this 
not work on a 486 box?>>This is DOS 5, BTW. Any help on the matter would be 
greatly appreciated.



Are you using the NOEMS parameter when loading EMM386.EXE?  If so, the
message about expanded services being unavailable is a normal one.  If
you need expanded memory for some applications use RAM instead of NOEMS.
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: dlm3@quads.uchicago.edu (saki)
Subject: Hard disk death
Reply-To: dlm3@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 05:25:10 GMT

A very aging Leading Edge, c.1987, running Dos 3.10, has recently
decided that its hard disk is not operational. I can boot it from
floppies and run whatever exists on floppies, but that's about
it. I've tried to use fdisk to repartition the hard drive and
reinstall Dos, but it refuses to accept the reality of its c:
drive...i.e., when asked whether I want to use the entire
fixed disk for Dos, whether I answer Y or N, it locks up on
the C drive (which I suspect because the c: drive red light
stays on).

I'm not trying this because I want to save a hopeless cause,
it's rather just a stop-gap till I can afford a completely new
machine...or maybe just replace the hard disk if that's what's
required. Is there any way around this problem or should I
just save my pennies for a 286 or 386 and forget salvaging
what I have?

Thanks for any advice.
----------------------
dlm3@midway.uchicago.edu OR dmac@math.ucla.edu
From: Deon.Strydom@p16.f1.n7104.z5.fidonet.org (Deon Strydom)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Reboot a PC from a batch file.
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 92 06:39:34 GMT
Organization: FidoNet node 5:7104/1.16 - The Catalyst BBS 1, Port Elizabeth

In a message of <Sep 01 21:02>, Brenda Williams (5:7104/2) wrote to All:

 BW> From: bwilliam@symphony.cc.purdue.edu (Brenda Williams)
 BW> The subject line kinda says it all. 

Hi Brenda,
If it's a DOS PC, look for PC Magazine excellent utility BATCHMAN (BM).  Amongst a host of other things it can do warm and cold reboots from a batch file or command line too.

Groetnis (=cheers)
Deon


--  
INTERNET: Deon.Strydom@p16.f1.n7104.z5.fidonet.org
via:  THE CATALYST BBS in Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
       (catpe.alt.za)   +27-41-34-1122 HST or +27-41-34-2859, V32bis & HST.
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: rnichols@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (robert.k.nichols)
Subject: Re: Sticky shift key, errant num-lock... Probably a FAQ
Summary: KEYB.COM is another possible solution
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 04:40:02 GMT

In article <4969@news.duke.edu> alan@acpub.duke.edu (Alan M. Gallatin) writes:
>Here's one that I'm sure I saw answered over a year ago...
>
>Whenever I have more than 2 or 3 TSR's loaded (low or high), my shift
>keys (generally the left one) and my num-lock keys behave strangely.
...

Here's another possible solution (and the only one that worked for me),
coming from deep within a database at Microsoft, and passed on to me
by Rich Williams, poster of the "int9fix?" set of fixes:

........................................................................

March 23, 1992

You may encounter erratic keyboard behavior when using the MS-DOS 5.0
HIMEM.SYS driver on certain systems. Symptoms may include a variety of
problems interpreting the state of the SHIFT, CAPS LOCK, NUM LOCK,
ALT, and CTRL keys.

...
    (fix that didn't work for me, using the HIMEM.SYS /machine:xxxx
     switch, deleted )
...

Another workaround is to include the line

   c:\dos\keyb us,,c:\dos\keyboard.sys

in your AUTOEXEC.BAT file. KEYB replaces the ROM BIOS INT 09h keyboard
interrupt with its own routine. This may allow handling of the
keyboard in a manner that does not conflict with A20 handling.

........................................................................

The line that I actually used was:

  loadhigh c:\dos\keyb us,,c:\dos\keyboard.sys

to conserve low memory.

Bob Nichols
rnichols@ihlpm.ih.att.com
From: dww2@po.CWRU.Edu (David W. Woodward)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: MS-DOS 5.0 and 'F'ailing...
Date: 28 Aug 92 21:32:09 GMT
Reply-To: dww2@po.CWRU.Edu (David W. Woodward)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)


Thank you for all the quick responses!  I found out that simply adding a
'/f' to the shell= line in config.sys will do the trick.

Here's hoping that works in 4DOS too!

Thanks again folks!

Dave
From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Test if Pkt Drv Loaded
Date: 1 Sep 92 04:04:05 GMT
Organization: Crynwr Software

In article <hippo.23.0@sonoma.edu> hippo@sonoma.edu writes:

   How do I test in a batch file if a 
   packet driver has been loaded ?

Run pktchk, it sets the errorlevel.

-russ <nelson@crynwr.com>  I'm proud to be a humble Quaker!
Crynwr Software            Crynwr Software sells packet driver support.
11 Grant St.               315-268-1925 Voice
Potsdam, NY 13676          315-268-9201 FAX
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: tsand@vipunen.hut.fi (Tapio Sand)
Subject: Re: HELP! EMM386 won't work!
Reply-To: tsand@vipunen.hut.fi (Tapio Sand)
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 08:22:18 GMT

In article <13617.2aa4cc37@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu> colovas@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:
>I have a new 486/33 and I'm trying to load things into high/expanded memory,
>but I'm having problems. when I load EMM386, it gives me a message that
>expanded memory services are unavailable. does this not work on a 486 box?
>This is DOS 5, BTW. Any help on the matter would be greatly appreciated.

The source of your problem is very likely in your AUTOEXEC.BAT 
and CONFIG.SYS files. You should list them for us to see.

A wild guess: try loading HIMEM.SYS before EMM386 in the
CONFIG.SYS file.
-- 
                                                           tsand@vipunen.hut.fi
TEX disconnects, dial again for another session.
D;+vC)?iH%"
NO CARRIER
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: kin@kin.compass.chel.su (Koliakin Yury D.)
Subject: Re: DR DOS 6.0 and WINDOWS 3.1
Summary: Re: DR DOS 6.0 and WINDOWS 3.1
Reply-To: kin@kin.compass.chel.su
Organization: COMPASS LTD
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 09:06:28 +0400

Results my experiment with

MS DOS 5.00 UPGRADE
HIMEM.SYS
SMARDDRV.SYS

DRDOS 6.0 UPGRADE
EMM386.SYS
HIDOS.SYS
SURERPCK.EXE

QEMM386.SYS 6.02
HYPERDISK 4.20

WINDOWS 3.01

is a folowing best configuration of DOS for my computer -
80486-33Mh-256cache, 4MB RAM, 120MB HDD (min mamory and max perfomance).
I deal both with DOS- and WINDOWS- applications at the same time.

                    --- CONFIG.SYS ---

rem ?????????????
rem ? QEMM 6.02 ?
rem ?????????????

DEVICE=C:\QEMM\QEMM386.SYS R:2 MAPS=16 RAM ROM ST:M

rem ???????????????????????
rem ? HYPERDISK CACHE 4.20?
rem ???????????????????????

DEVICE=C:\HYPER\HYPERDKX.EXE S A C:2048:512 T:0 XS XM XT I:4000 P:1

rem ????????????????
rem ? MOUSE DRIVER ?
rem ????????????????

DEVICE=C:\QEMM\LOADHI.SYS /R:2 C:\DOS.EXT\MOUSE.SYS

rem ?????????????????
rem ? OS DR DOS 6.0 ?
rem ?????????????????

HIDOS=ON
BREAK=ON
HIBUFFERS=3
FILES=30
FCBS=20,20
FASTOPEN=512
LASTDRIVE=N
STACKS=0,0
HISTORY=ON, 256, OFF, OFF, OFF
SHELL=C:\COMMAND.COM C:\ /P /E:512

                    --- AUTOEXEC.BAT ---

@ECHO OFF
PROMPT $P$G
VERIFY OFF
PATH C:\WINDOWS;C:\;C:\DRDOS;C:\NCW;C:\NC;C:\NU;
SET TMP=C:\TEMP
SET TEMP=C:\TEMP
SET NU=C:\NU
SHARE /L:20
IF NOT "%TEMP%"=="" MD %TEMP% >NUL
DELWATCH C: D: /F:20 /B:1 /O:swp+tmp+$db
DELWATCH /S
DISKMAP C: D:
TaskMax

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Yury D. Koliakin


Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc