Newsgroups: bit.listserv.allmusic
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 11:47:44 CDT
From:         "Leonard Watkins" <ISTS024@UABDPO.BITNET>
Subject:      re: WHERE y'ALL AT
              14 Aug 1992 10:57:18 CDT from <U19807@UICVM.UIC.EDU>

On Fri, 14 Aug 1992 10:57:18 CDT <U19807@UICVM.UIC.EDU> said:
>In article <ALLMUSIC%92081408533835@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU>, "Leonard Watkins"
>(or even shorter) messages. Please try to remember that many posters on/readers
>of this list only get it via LISTSERV,as they don't have netnews/usenet feeds.
>Some of them (not me,but that's not the point) also have to _pay_ to use their
>accounts,and I'm sure that they don't appreciate having to scan through all
>these extra-short messages,thereby burning up computer account money.

I was not aware of that really does make a difference thanks for the advice

>
>Thirdly,I never assumed that you've been posting for 32 years. I just have to
>wonder why you responded in a fashion that resembles something someone half
>your age would write.
i guess you know now you've broke my (here it comes) ackey-breaky-heart
i so much wanted someone like you to respect me and admire me. When i
grow up i want to be just like you. You don't need a roomate do ya. You
could teach me to spell and i could help your personality(of course first
you'll have to get one.
>
>> I don't mean do be defensive but i'll not be a doormat for somr
>>puedo-intellec
>>tual either


>
>Ummmmpf. I'll have to read Rick's original post,but I somehow doubt that his
>complaints can be called "pseudo-intellectual" if they have to do with this
>subject matter,unless "pseudo-intellectual" means "a complainer about net-
>iquette" instead of what it says in the Webster's.

Okay i take that back, but only because my admiration for you influenced me

>
>> a fellow brought up lee atwater the other day where were you i didn't hear
>> you reply to him and with all the tipper gore crap that's been said on
>> hear i never heard you make the same comment, any way that was a joke
>
>Guess what-I don't have to reply to eveything I read. Do you?

Guess what - IMHO the least you reply the better this group gets

>
>Likewise,if it was a joke,it was a fairly limp one,as most _good_ jokes tend
\to refer to something being made fun of. Yours,if I remember correctly,didn't.

I was beginning to think we were best friends, but your pushing your luck


>
>> If i send this privately i would have missed talking with such a personality
>>plus person like your self, if this in any way offends you....good
>>you deserve it
I don't remember saying this, but i obviously did and i'm truly honestly
sorry and i really mean that. It was uncalled for and must have been a
pre-caffiene post. sorry
>
>Real mature reply for someone who claims he's 32,kid.
 what do you mean by claims, if i was gonna lie i would brag about
 being a close friend or relative of yours just think i'm kin to
 NETUS god of the net
>
>>  I hope your P.M.S subsides, have yoy tried midol.
>
>Never did. I'm not the right gender for it. BTW,have _you_ ever thought of
>buying a pocket dictionary in order to ascertain how to properly spell
>"you"?

 how about prep.-h but then would you shrink to nothing
 Is there one you could recommend , that dicshunary thing you talked
 about
***************
Now look all the above was in fun for me, i should not have said the things
i said i understand the 1-line post much better thanks to you, my new
best buddy. Really enjoyed your comments don't drop any garbage cans
or fall of the truck at work today. Just kidding really did enjoy it
 Your new Friend and idolizer
    L. Watkins

>
>      ** Chris Krolczyk,esq.  * DISCLAIMER: My opinions are in **
>      ** Maniac-at-Large      * no way endorsed by the Univer- **
>      ** U19807@UICVM.BITNET  * sity of Illinois at Chicago.   **
>      ** u19807@uicvm.uic.edu * So there. Nyaah.               **
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU