Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush is such a bad loser
From: kmitche@eis.calstate.edu (Kenneth Mitchell)
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 09:24:36 GMT
Organization: Calif State Univ/Electronic Information Services

pvanmeur@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Pim van Meurs) writes:
> Rush is such a bad loser. He now claims victory for conservatism
> since the democrats had to shift to the center to be elected. Well,
> I think conservatism has lost since people didn't support Bush and
> the ultra right wing, wacko religious right present at the
> republican convention. It's clear to me, they have rejected the
> ideas of the most conservative platform since ages. People are tired
> of the bigotry and hate which has become so inherent to the
> republican party.

Many of us "true Conservatives" have been repulsed by the antics of the
Falwells and the Robertsons only SLIGHTLY less than we've been repulsed by
the idiocy of the democrats and environmental extremists. Especially since
Bush, having rejected Conservative economics and government, chose to
embrace pseudo-conservative "values" and religion; and then quietly let
the opposition define the terms of the debate.  


> California is sending to female senators to Washington, one of them
> was running against a true conservative, Hershenson. And she carried
> the State. 

Between DiFi and Seymour, there was not a nickel's worth of difference. I
voted for Seymour, but shed no tears over his loss, and DiFi beat him
easily.  Hershensohn was LEADING Barbie Bouncer; her margin of victory was
a slim one, and the results weren't known when I went to bed at midnight
PST. 

> Bill and Al have won 350+ electoral votes, a clear indicator that
> were it note for Perot a similar landslide popular vote would have
> resulted. 

A shift of fewer than a million votes in Michigan, Illinois, and a few
other states would have given Bush the victory. No "clear indicators"
there.  This election was a referendum on Bush, nothing else; Bush lost. 
Want further proof? Term limits were on the ballot in 14 states, and won
everywhere. 


> Bright days are ahead of us, we have a liberal president. Cuomo will
> soon be appointed as supreme court justice, abortion will become
> more pro-choice.

How could that be possible? Abortions are ALREADY legal, right up to
delivery day. I'm no "right-to-lifer", but reasonable restrictions on
third-trimester abortions are neccessary, IMHO. 

> And what about Rush Limbaugh ? He is such a bad loser and is hoping
> that Bill won't be able to help the country. He is insinuating so
> many things, "He is a lier, we will have not problems with other
> liers who happen to run dictatorial countries". Hmm, I guess he
> won't send them US funds to expand their military, nuclear and
> chmical capabilities and then send in american troups to take care
> of it. Do you think Bush will write his memoirs from prison ?

Given the expensive failures of Walsh et.al., it seems unlikely; that
idiot couldn't prosecute a bank robber even if he had video of the whole
thing. 


> Who is Rush trying to fool ? A big blow has been delivered to the
> right wing wackos. Finally we have someone who will spend some time
> on the US economy instead of flying around the world to increase his
> satnding in the rest of the world.

Actually, the American economy thrives on benign neglect; it works best if
you leave it alone. Clinton/Mitchell/Foley won't do that; they'll have an
expensive government bureaucracy to manage every phase of it right into
the ground. 

> The people have spoken and have spoken very clearly. It is time for
> a change....

56% of the voters DID NOT vote for Clinton. That's pretty clear, all
right. 

> Congratulations Bill, Hillary, Al and Tipper. You are the greatest,
> finally some real people in the white house, finally some women who
> are more than just obedient housewives, finally some people who
> stand close the the majority of the US people.

Clinton and Gore are about as much "real people"  (meaning, I take it,
"average joes" who are much like the rest of us) as Donald Trump is.
Neither has EVER had a job. Neither has any respect for the intelligence
of the average person. Both are liars, who believe that the end justifies
the means. Hell, their campaign proves that; look at the bizarre promises
they made, their first one way, then the other statements. Who among us
was concerned about "maintaining his political viability" at age 21? 

Get real!  Sex & Gore have pulled the wool firmly over your eyes, and
having seen how easy it was to do that, they're going to do it some more.
It's gonna be a LONG four years. 

Ken Mitchell
kmitche@eis.calstate.edu