HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lamg@fraser.sfu.ca (Kin Lam)
Subject: Re: VGA in a window...really???
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 11:55:02 GMT

daw50509@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Don A. Walthers) writes:

>tnfx1@isuvax.iastate.edu writes:

>>Has anyone actually gotten a VGA dos program to work in a window in 
>>Win3.1 enh. mode???

>>If so fill me in on how to get it working...

>I was able to get a vga dos app (pcglobe) in a window but you have
>to define working. In the .pif I gave it all of the proccessor, set 
>the video memory to high and locked all required memory. I can't 
>think of anything else to do except wait until a freind gets os/2.
>I guess windows is still not ready for dos graphics. Any ideas???

    Even EGA isn't any better.  I tried running Leisure Suit Larry IV in a 
windowed dos box.  I also gave it all the processing time and memory in the
pif settings.  The speed is unacceptably slow.  If you switch it back to
full screen, it runs much faster.  (although noticably slower than running
on plain dos.)
    My hardware is a 486-33 with 4Mb ram, 15ms IDE hard-disk, ATI-Ultra
video card.
From: gentile@bcse.enet.dec.com (My name is Sam Gentile)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Win 3.1 PC speaker MM driver?
Date: 9 Apr 92 14:48:16 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


In article <21181@hacgate.UUCP>, mcall@devnet.hac.com (Mike Callinan) writes...
>>>I dialed into the Microsoft BBS (the number listed on the back of that
>>>little pamphlet thing that came with Windows 3.1 -- with the tech support
>>>numbers on it) looking for something else, and found something called
>>>PCSPEAK.EXE (or something similar).  I downloaded it, installed it, and
>>
>>It's called SPEAK.EXE.
> 
> 
>Does anyone know if SPEAK.EXE is at cica or can be uploaded?  Would Microsoft
>allow this?  Can a copy be legally mailed?
> 
>Thanks,
> 
>Mike C
>mcall@devnet.hac.com

Can someone mail me  a copy if this is allowed? I have no modem either and 
would really like to get a copy.

Thanks,
Sam
From: cchapman@matd.gatech.edu (Charles H. Chapman)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Win 3.1, DOS windows, mice and video drivers
Date: 10 Apr 92 12:23:48 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <26@sandnet.ucsd.edu> hughesr@SANDNET.UCSD.EDU (Richard Hughes) writes:


>          In 386 enhanced mode, Win 3.1 will smoothly transfer the
>          windows mouse cursor into a DOS window providing that the
>          new mouse.sys or mouse.com driver (disk 4) is manually
>          installed *and* providing you use one of the supplied video
>          drivers.  After installing the new mouse driver, it took a
>          while to realise that I had to forgo my 256 colour driver
>          and go back to the 16 color VGA driver.


Not entirely true.  I did have to use the new mouse driver that came with
Win 3.1 but I'm using the old 3.0 version of the Video Seven 800x600x256
driver that I got off cica a while back and that works fine as far as using
the mouse in a windowed DOS box.  Now I *have* had trouble running graphical
applications in a windowed DOS box but I haven't tried using the Win 3.1
drivers yet to see if that fixes it.


Chuck

Charles H. Chapman  (GTRI/MATD)             (404) 528-7588
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:     ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,ut-ngp}!gatech!matd!cchapman
Internet: cchapman@matd.gatech.edu
From: cxf12@po.CWRU.Edu (Christopher Fenton)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: 5 Meg Long Print File
Date: 9 Apr 92 22:04:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: usenet.1992Apr9.220454.22305
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)


	I got bored last night and downloaded a bunch of GIFs of
babes and found one I wanted to add to my wall.  So I opened
Paintshop Pro and printed it to a Postscript file.  The problem
is that it took almost 45 minutes to print to the files on 33 Mhz
386 with 4 megs of ram, and the print files was almost 6 megs 
long!!!  Which was way too big for the printserver, and I'm
wondering if its problem with 3.1 Postscript driver or 3.1
Windows in general.  

	Anybody got any ideas????  Pertinent e-mail always 
welcome...


	###
-- 

    cxf12          ---===<<< A I S Computer Operations >>>===---
@po.cwru.edu             Department of Redundancy Department
Christopher H. Fenton      Case Western Reserve University
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: kadie@herodotus.cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M. Kadie)
Subject: Win 3.1+W4W 2.0: equations still not printing
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 16:46:00 GMT


OK, I paid to upgrade W4W to 2.0, in part to get better equations.  I
discovered that they wouldn't print to a non-postscript printer until
Win 3.1.

OK, I paid to upgrade to Win 3.1, in part so I won't have to worry so
much about which font goes with which printer. I still can't get
symbols like Integration to print on my dot matrix printer.

Maybe I just have my fonts set up wrong (equation
editor/style/define). If so, I would be grateful if someone would tell
me the correct setup.

Or, maybe I need to spend another ~$50 and buy more fonts.

- Carl
--
Carl Kadie -- kadie@cs.uiuc.edu -- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: colfelt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Andrew BW Colfelt)
Subject: Re: NDW Backup Problem with WIN 3.1
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 23:07:13 GMT

JWEST@r3vm.dsd.trw.com (Judson West) writes:

>In article <2138@transfer.stratus.com>
>rscott@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Richard Scott) writes:
> 
>>I installed WIN 3.1 this weekend and have been using it with no problems (my
>>I was also able to do an incremental backup with the Norton Backup for 
>>Windows (under NDW 1.0) with no problems.  However, when I tried to do a 
>>full backup that required more than one floppy, it bombed and I got 
>>tossed out into DOS when NBW asked for and tried to detect the second 
>>floppy.  
> 
>I don't think Symantec is supporting NDW 1.0 under WIN 3.1. I didn't have
>those problems but I had a number of other problems until I installed
>NDW 2.0. 

I had the same problem under Win3.0.

This problem with the Norton Backup under NDW 1.0
is NOT a Windows 3.x problem.  The problem is with
Norton Backup.

There are 2 things to tinker with that might help:

1) You should use the Configure dialog to set the
   "Disk Log Strategy" to 'Most Compatible.' (NOT 'Fastest')

2) If this doesn't fix the problem, also check the "Slow DMA"
   box.

Symantec also advised AGAINST using the Proprietary Disk
Format- it is highly unstable.  Cramming every micron
of Floppy surface area with data is NOT a reliable backup
method.  (Makes you wonder why they included the 'feature.')



-- 
Andrew          
Colfelt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU
--
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc
From: teverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (Toby Everett)
Subject: Re: Tastes gross/more fattening (repost (last attempt only got ~1 site))
Keywords: (hex encoded ASCII) 3A 2D 29
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 14:00:07 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.051700.10839@midway.uchicago.edu> chi9@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>0.0333333333333, which gives us the astounding answer that Windows 3.0 is 1.5
>of an operating system!                                                   ^^^

	Which is what many people have been saying all along.  Windows is only
one half an operating system.  :-)
        --Toby Everett
        --teverett@jarthur.claremont.edu
        --"I'm rooting for Boca.  How about you?"
        --"Tomorrow is history!"

Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: pvonk@scott.skidmore.edu (Pierre VonKaenel)
Subject: Novell and IPX
Organization: Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs NY, 12866
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:18:29 GMT


To make a long story short....  Win3.1 update complained about my
current IPX.  But have continued using it with no problems.  What
incompatibilities should I expect?   Also used MS' IPX.OBJ to generate
a new IPX.COM, no go.. the system hangs.  Anyone successful at
generating a new IPX??

-- 
Pierre von Kaenel	| Skidmore College	     | pvonk@scott.skidmore.edu
Math & CS Dept.		| Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | (518)584-5000 Ext 2391

"Baseball is 90% mental, the other half is physical" - Yogi
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: mcdonald@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (Doug McDonald)
Subject: Win 3.1 setup flame
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 02:06:49 GMT



Well, I've got a flame at Windows 3.1, specifically the setup program.


I installed it over my 3.0 version, using my ORchid Pro II 768x1024x256
color video driver. This worked, but I did not get vga or ega programs
to run in a window. No surprise. But I DID get adjustable font sizes
in DOS Windows - nice, and a surprise.


So I tried running the supplied 600x800x16 color Super Vga driver.
This did run Vga programs in a window - and, may you OS/2 partisans
note, run them a hell of a lot better than the OS/2 beta I tried.


But this was just for curiosity - so I tried going back to the previous setup
-- and failed -- no m,atter waht I tried, I could not get back!!!!


So I have to reinstall Windows over a backup of my old Windows 3.0.



Doug McDonald



Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn)
Subject: Re: Why I'm sticking with Windows
Organization: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 20:17:20 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.200508.18117@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> smsmith@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Smith) writes:
/>donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn) writes:
/>
/>>Hey, I think I finally came up with a good reason to get my free OS/2 2.0
/>>upgrade.  (From the OS/2 1.3 version that came bundled with my PS/2 which I
/>>threw in the trash long ago.)  Perhaps when NT is released, Microsoft will
/>>give me a very big discount for trading in OS/2 2.0.  I think I'll get
/>>the free upgrade and stick it on my top shelf right next to my copies of IBM's
/>>Personal Editor, Professional Editor, Displaywrite, Filing Assistant and
/>>empty OS/2 1.3 binder where the first page will be avaliable for ripping
/>>out to send to Microsoft for my NT upgrade.  ;-)
/>
/>So tell us Donald, what system will you be running NT on?

Well lets see, the Silicon Graphics Indigo?, the microVax?, the Sun?, the new
486?  perhaps even this Convex multiprocessor supercomputer?

Gee, what an excellent question! I guess I just can't decide. Hmmmm!  What
a dilemma.  Your right, perhaps I better see if I can get several free OS/2
upgrades.  I might need quite a few first pages.  ;-)

Windows NT - The one operating system that fits all.

--
Donald A. Lehn, Ph.D.                      Phone: (301) 496-2885
Bldg.37 Rm 3D20                            FAX:   (301) 496-8419
National Cancer Institute / NIH            Email: donnel@helix.nih.gov
Bethesda MD 20892
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: jeffery sumler <jsumler@silver.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: Setting up a '286 clone for max perf.
Organization: Indiana University
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 20:31:18 -0500

In article <1992Apr15.143901.27865@alw.nih.gov> donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn) writes:
>In article <N!DL2&H@ais.org> impster@ais.org (Charles Budensiek) writes:
>/>I have a 80286 PC clone with the following stats:
>/>
>/>1 meg of memory
>/>BOIS and VIDEO Shadow RAM capabilities
>/>40 meg hard drive
>/>16 MHz clock speed
>/>
>/>Now, what exactly should I put in my config.sys and autoexec.bat files to
>/>maximize the performance of windows 3.1?
>/>
>/>impster@ais.org

I'm running Win 3.1 on a 16 MHz 286 and I get very snappy performance,
even with my old/slow paradise VGA 16+ card. I recommend:
1) Don't bother with shadowing the video or main BIOS. Eats up what
would otherwise be extended memory that Windows can use. 
2) Break down and invest in more RAM. I started with only 1 meg and
Win 3 thrashed quite a bit--adding a second meg noticeably boosted
performance. 1Mx9 80ns SIMMs can be had for under $40 now. Installing
memory is a snap if you're at all technically inclined. Read your
motherboard manual (if you have one :-) Overall, more memory is the
best investment you can make, since it's cheap, will boost
performance, and will allow you to use a good disk cache (Smartdrv 4.0
that comes with Win 3.1 is quite good). Try then to get at least
another 2 megs of RAM.
3) A good trick buried in Microsoft's discussion of the system.ini
configuration file. Add this line to the [standard] section of
system.ini:  FasterModeSwitch=1      This allows Win 3.1 to use a
faster method of switching from protected to real mode on most 286s. 
I noticed a small but surprising improvement in disk access after I 
added this line to my system.ini.
4) The 286 simply lacks the raw horsepower of 386 and higher
processors. Big programs designed to enhance Windows (e.g. Norton
Desktop ver. 2.0) will cause your system to slow down noticeably.
You'll have to decide if the added functionality is worth the
performance hit.
5) Specifically, my config.sys looks like this (I'm using DOS 5.0):
FILES=30
BUFFERS=5
STACKS=0,0
device=C:\WINDOWS\HIMEM.SYS
DOS=HIGH
DEVICE=C:\SYSTEM\DOS\ANSI.SYS
SHELL=C:\NDOS.COM /s:D  /a:1536 /E:350 /P

Pretty vanilla, nothing fancy. STACKS=0,0 frees up a little memory in
the lower 640K, DOS=HIGH allows the DOS kernel to load itself into the
HMA. The SHELL statement is specific to my setup and doesn't mean a
thing in this discussion. My autoexec.bat is also ordinary, the only
important thing is does is load smartdrv.

hope this was of some value
---
jeffery sumler
internet: jsumler@silver.ucs.indiana.edu
bitnet  : jsumler@iubacs.bitnet 
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: finance@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au (Finance - very temporary)
Subject: Re: AfterDark 2.0 - ? 256 colours
Organization: Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, Australia
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 23:43:31 GMT

jcmorris@mwunix (Joe Morris) writes:

>In article <92092.075805SASTPH@vm.sas.com>, SASTPH@vm.sas.com (Tim Hunter) writes:
>> Not that anybody asked, but I just installed AfterDark 2.0.  I'm an unabashed
>> fan of this program, and signed up for version 2.0 immediately upon receiving
>> my upgrade notice.

>When did you get your upgrade notice?  Based on comments on the net it 
>sounds like the upgrades have been out for a while, but I've not seen
>anything from Berkeley...



>Joe Morris

I also am interested in why I haven't heard anything. I'm in Australia and
bought my version 1.0a locally. Has anyone else in Australia managed to get
an upgrade?

Please MAIL responses to pedro@cangate.fujitsu.oz.au as I only have temporary
access to NEWS.

Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: daw50509@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Don A. Walthers)
Subject: WIN3.1 800*600*256 video drivers?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 05:36:15 GMT


Does anyone know if Microsoft will be releasing a 800*600*256
video driver for WIN3.1? I have a GATEWAY2000 386sx-20c and I
tried the supplied video driver but lost all of the speed 
advantages of the WINDOWS dirvers. If not, will GATEWAY be 
releasing one? I ask because I did not get the 3.1 upgrade
from them. 

thanxs
don walthers  daw50509@uxa.csu.uiuc.edu

Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: michael@sequent.com (Michael Squires)
Subject: Re: Help with Windows 3.1 memory management
Keywords: memory
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems, Inc.
Distribution: sqnt
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 15:29:45 GMT

landy@cco.caltech.edu (Brian R. Landy) writes:


>   Please help me.  I am running Windows 3.1 on an IBM PS/2 with a 16MHz
>386SX, 2MB of RAM, and a 4MB permanent swap file.  After installing
>Windows, I usedd the hDC Memory Mapper utility and noticed that it
>had DOS taking up 2.5MB of memory.  Windows 3.0 sure didn't do this!
>I have tried removing all possible TSR's, except HIMEM and STACKER,
>since I need both to run in 386 enh. mode.  I also did not remove my mouse
>driver, which is the one supplied with Windows 3.1, as is the version
>of HIMEM.  Can anyone help me?  The Microsoft tech. line is constantly busy.

I heard somewhere (here?) that the hDC memory mapper didn't really 
understand the 3.1 layout, so gave bogus results. I fired it up yesterday
(at work) & the numbers looked screwy to me. I had also heard that
they had an update available (on compuserve). If I get it I'll post the
results.

					Michael
From: john.will@satalink.com (John Will)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: PARADISE 512K DRIVER FOR
Date: 12 Apr 92 14:36:00 GMT
Reply-To: john.will@satalink.com (John Will)
Organization: Satalink Info Systems - Huntingdon Valley, PA - 215-364-3324

TO: daw50509@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
DA.Does anyone know if paradise released a 800*600*256
  .driver for win3.1. I called gateway2000 and they said
  .that the file should be on their bbs but I can't find 
  .the words paradise or win3.1 in the index.

Probably not, the older Paradise boards are incapable of running in that
resolution.  It's not a lack of memory, just a bandwidth problem with the
older Paradise chipset.  The new series from WD is capable of higher
resolutions and colors, but that doesn't sound like what you have.
---
 . KingQWK 1.05 . Artificial Intelligence: The other guy's opinion.
From: nevries@accucx.cc.ruu.nl (Nico de Vries.)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Why go to 3.1 if 2.0 works
Date: 13 Apr 92 10:58:57 GMT
Organization: Academic Computer Centre Utrecht

In <moore.703043080@pv34c1.vincent.iastate.edu> moore@iastate.edu (Brian J Moore) writes:

>In <1992Apr11.132541.26604@engr.uark.edu> dch2@engr.uark.edu (David Hobbs) writes:

>>At the rollout at my local IBM yesterday, I saw the film at Comdex where
>>IBM was running 3.1 in a OS/2Win along with DOS and other OS/2 programs.
>>Reiswig(sp?) joked and said something to the effect of "Look what we've
>>done just 24 hrs. after 3.1 was released..."

>And now I'll ask the question everyone really wanted to know....

>Will OS/2 run my DOS games in a box? (or at all?)
Yes. Even those nasty ones like Flight simulator and Wing COmmander.

>-- 
>   ________________________________________________________________________
>  /                                  /                                    /
> /  Brian J. Moore                  /                  moore@iastate.edu /
>/__________________________________/____________________________________/


Nico de Vries
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
USENET: nevries@cc.ruu.nl                 FIDO      : 2:281/708.1  (very new) 
VOICE : +31-3404-24931 (+31-30-316931)    FAX       : +31-30-312033 
BBS   : +31-30-341401 (Nico De_vries)     COMPUSERVE: (coming)
MAIL  : Hortensialaan 45, 3702VE, Zeist, The Netherlands 

IMPORT StdDisclaimer, MyPersonalOpinion;          - O   Place reserved for
Complaints about my spelling to DEV/NUL please.    |    funny joke. Sugestions 
I work for BITECH, I don't SPEAK for BITECH.      \_/   apreciated.
Xref: sparky comp.windows.ms:12053 rec.music.synth:7703
From: yon@smltlk.enet.dec.com (David A. Yon)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,rec.music.synth
Subject: MIDI under Windows 3.1 (was: Re: 3.1 sound and APM)
Date: 9 Apr 92 12:48:12 GMT
Reply-To: yon@smltlk.enet.dec.com (David A. Yon)
Followup-To: comp.windows.ms, rec.music.synth
Distribution: usa
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation

In article <1992Apr09.032344.62626@yuma.acns.colostate.edu>,
hughm@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Hugh Moore) writes:
|>Has anyone alse had trouble getting the MIDI driver(s) to work with 3.1?
|>I have an MU-401 compatable MIDI card and a Proteus/1 and haven't gotten
|>this stuff to work yet.  I've tried the "Drivers" menu in the Control Panel
|>and it seems to indicate that I have done things correctly, but it still
|>won't work.
|>

	Well, yesterday I had posted my gripe about MIDI support, but I've
got everything working.  My system:

	Gateway 486/33C, 16meg, ATI Graphics Ultra
	Win 3.1/DOS 5.0
	Music Quest MQX-32M Dual-Port MIDI Card
	SoundBlaster 1.5
	MasterTracks Pro 3.96 (waiting impatiently for 4.5) :-)
	Proteus/1, Proteus/2, D-50, Proformance, Alesis D4

	When I first installed Win 3.1, all I could get it to do was to
treat my MIDI card as a generic MPU-401 card, which means I lost SMPTE 
support and the ability to select which MIDI output to use.  Needless to
say this was rather disturbing, as I had each Proteus quite nicely set
up on seperate MIDI outs.  Otherwise, the MPU-401 support worked as
expected.

	Music Quest has a new set of Win 3.1 drivers posted to the 
MIDIVENDOR forum on CompuServe.  I downloaded those and installed
them, and whamo! seperate MIDI outs are available from any app that
uses the MultiMedia interface!  Pretty damn slick if you ask me!  
The MIDI mapper is a great feature for those who want to share 
sequences and not have to worry about incompatible patch banks. I 
think that we are in for some exciting times for computer music and
sound now that this new baseline has been established.  Look for a
plethoria of sound-capable Windows programs, and with it, hopefully
a new surge of cheap sound cards that have quality sound.  How about 
a Proteus/1 and /2 on a card, along with a 16-bit D/A port!!  Yeah!
That's the ticket!  Sorry guys, but the SoundBlaster sounds like an 
AM radio station from 200 miles away.  YUCK!

--
David Yon
yon%smltlk.cbm.dec.com@decwrl.dec.com <--- use this address
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: shopsis@auvax1.adelphi.edu
Subject: QEMM 5.11 & Win 3.1
Organization: ADELPHI UNIVERSITY
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 23:07:41 GMT

I haven't loaded win 3.1 yet.  I'm using QEMM 5.11.  Does anyone know if there
is a conflict between these two?
From: jcmorris@mwunix.mitre.org (Joe Morris)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: True Type w/ Postscript printer
Date: 8 Apr 92 18:23:27 GMT
Article-I.D.: mwunix.jcmorris.702757407
Organization: The MITRE Corporation

ericbi@microsoft.com (Eric BIDSTRUP) writes:

>In article <rreiner.701314200@yorku.ca>, rreiner@nexus.yorku.ca (Richard Reiner) writes:
>> When printing to a Postscript printer using non-built-in fonts, does
>> Win 3.1's True Type generate a Postscript font description and
>> download it to the printer for use, or does it simply send text in
>> such fonts as bitmaps, thus producing enormous printer data streams?

>The Postscript driver will (by default) download TrueType fonts, for
>those Truetype fonts w/o built-in Postscript conterparts, as Type 1
>Postscript fonts. Users may request the driver to download them as
>Type 3 Postscript fonts instead via the "Advanced Options" dialog.

See section 4.5 of the PRINTERS.WRI file in the Windows directory.  By 
setting the WIN.INI variable in the [ModelName,Port] section:

   MinOutlineEPPem=<number>

you specify in number of points per em where the dividing line is between
sending bitmaps and sending PostScript font calls.  The default value
is 101; fonts with fewer points/em are sent as bitmaps and fonts with
more points/emm are outline (PostScript) calls.  (Don't ask me what
happens if point/em is exactly equal to MinOutlineEPPem.)

Joe Morris
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Friday, 10 Apr 1992 21:44:32 EDT
From: Jeffrey S. Payne <JSP105@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: (Q) PS/2 + Win 3.1 + mouse driver = boom on exit

Actually I am running the same setup, and it doesn't lock up, but hangs for
about 15-20 seconds after exit...wait a little longer before the 3finger
salute, and see what happens...

Jeffrey S. Payne        JSP105@PSUVM(.psu.edu)
Penn State Ogontz Campus / Woodland Computer Center

"Any significantly advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"
    -A.C. Clarke,Murphy,Jean-Luc Picard, and other significant intellects