HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: linley@netcom.com (Bruce James Robrert Linley)
Subject: Re: Where are the Yeomans? (was Re: Officer ranks)
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, UCLA
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 00:04:58 GMT

In a previous article dug@hpopd.pwd.hp.com (Dug Smith) spake...
>Is a Yeoman the Captain's babe then...?

Kirk gave that impression- "My own yeoman..."
Ahh, if only Riker were born a hundred years earlier.
-- 
Bruce James Robert Linley | "Well, I tried shoving a weiner in the warp drive,
Comp Sci & Engr, UCLA     |  but it didn't do a bit o' good."
<linley@netcom.com>       | - Star Dreck, c/o Dr. Demento
<linley@seas.ucla.edu>    |
From: brian@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Brian Wood)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 15:39:05 GMT
Subject: Re: STVI Continuity error ?
Organization: HP Mfg. Test Div., Loveland, CO
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current

Connor MacLeod writes:
>I'm sure somebody must have already mentioned this, but in Star Trek VI,
>the cloaked bird of prey is defeated by a gas-seeking torpedo - Lt Uhuru
>having suggested the use of 'the equipment we're carrying to chart
>gaseous planetary anomolies' - How is it, then, that at the beginning
>of the film, it is the Excelsior which is carrying this equipment, not
>the Enterprise - in fact, the Enterprise is in space dock when Kirk et
>al. first set off - thus (presumably) it has not got this equipment on
>board ??

Actually, this was explained by the producers as a mistake that wasn't
caught until the movie was nearly released, and it was too late to fix
it, so they just left it in, figuring that the nit-pickers could rationalize
a way around the problem, as we have done.

Brian

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: firestar@leland.Stanford.EDU (Lipton Ann Meredith)
Subject: Re: do we need rec.arts.startrek.dsn?
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 01:35:52 GMT

In article <HROSE.92Dec15201113@rocza.eff.org> hrose@eff.org (Helen Trillian Rose) writes:
>Greg> == Greg Pallenik <gp2001@andy.bgsu.edu> 
>
> Greg> This newsgroup is becomminh cluttered with discussion of Deep
> Greg> Space Nine.  I'm not complaining, but IMHO I think a separate
> Greg> group will be needed to keep things organized.  Does anyone else
> Greg> agree or disagree?
>
>Disagree. "rec.arts.startrek.current" was created so there wouldn't be a
>"tos" and "tng" group. "current" covers "tos" movies as well as "tng". I
>don't see why dsn shouldn't fall under "current". Perhaps tags on mesage
>subjects? like "Subject: TNG: Picard and Troi?!?!" or 
>"Subject: DSN: Sisko is based on an Intel chip!" -- either way would
>make Kill-files an easy way to manage the traffic. 
>
>--Helen

I dunno anything about the reasons for splitting up the r.a.startrek groups,
but I'm not sure killfiles could do the job -- I mean, I don't want to _not_
read stuff about DSN, I just would like to keep it separate so I don't get all
confused.  So I can read about TNG and read about DSN without having to think
overly much.  Just my $.02.


Firestar


-- 
I don't bite, you know.    | Find me and turn thy | It is better to have loved 
Unless it's called for.    | back on heaven.      | and lost than to have your
-- Audrey Hepburn, Charade | -- R. W. Emerson     | finger caught in a blender.
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: billma@utoday.com (Bill Mallon)
Subject: An RE: Sex, the Final Frontier?
Reply-To: billma@utoday.com (Bill Mallon)
Organization: CMP Publications, Inc.
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 92 19:41:27 GMT

In article <1gr3k3INNiub@agate.berkeley.edu>, dgreen@thor (David 
Greenebaum) writes:

But
> in the 500 years since then, she's matured, and mature Listeners have
> funny-shaped heads.  So she wears a funny hat, to make the non-Listeners
> on the Enterprise feel more at ease.

If Listeners have funny-shaped heads once they pass the half-millenium mark, 
where did she hide her aft lobe while fencing with Picard?
    I think her hat and, indeed, her entire attire are 1) what bartenders/single 
mothers/whatever from her world wear instead of aprons, and 2) something to 
differentiate her from the command structure (like Troi's dress-cum-paint job).

"I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mneumonic 
memory circuit, using stone knives and bearskins." --Spock
                             Humble Typesetter
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: hrose@eff.org (Helen Trillian Rose)
Subject: Re: do we need rec.arts.startrek.dsn?
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: The Evil Fascist IRC Admins From Hell, Inc.
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 01:11:16 GMT

Greg> == Greg Pallenik <gp2001@andy.bgsu.edu> 

 Greg> This newsgroup is becomminh cluttered with discussion of Deep
 Greg> Space Nine.  I'm not complaining, but IMHO I think a separate
 Greg> group will be needed to keep things organized.  Does anyone else
 Greg> agree or disagree?

Disagree. "rec.arts.startrek.current" was created so there wouldn't be a
"tos" and "tng" group. "current" covers "tos" movies as well as "tng". I
don't see why dsn shouldn't fall under "current". Perhaps tags on mesage
subjects? like "Subject: TNG: Picard and Troi?!?!" or 
"Subject: DSN: Sisko is based on an Intel chip!" -- either way would
make Kill-files an easy way to manage the traffic. 

--Helen
--
Helen Trillian Rose             	<hrose@eff.org, hrose@kei.com>
Electronic Frontier Foundation   	email eff@eff.org for EFF Info
Kapor Enterprises, Inc.                 Flames to: 
Systems and Networks Administration	women-not-to-be-messed-with@eff.org
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: charlesa@niwot.scd.ucar.edu (Charles Albrecht)
Subject: DS9 GIFs?
Summary: Do any exist?
Organization: Scientific Computing Divison/NCAR Boulder, CO
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:52:20 GMT

Does anyone have any GIFs of Deep Space Nine?  Or will we have to wait
until after the show actually airs?

-C  charlesa@ncar.ucar.edu


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: jkl@fsl.noaa.gov (Jennifer Longstaff)
Subject: Re: Female CO for the E  II
Organization: Forecast Systems Lab, NOAA - Boulder CO, USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:57:00 GMT

christopher stone (cstone@husc8.harvard.edu) wrote:
: As I interpret your argument, it would not be profitable for Paramount
: to have a female captain, since 20th cen. TV viewers wouldn't accept
: it.  I must disagree here.  First, television can *change* people's
: opinions about the "macho image," much as TOS did in the 60's about
: a lot of social issues and "Cagney and Lacey" did a few years ago
: with regard to female detectives.  
: Chris

I agree that showing *competent* women in leadership roles in ST will
work, and will change peoples' role model images.  However, tell me if
I'm paranoid, but it seems to me that Paramount has done more to hurt
people's impressions of women in leadership positions.  Just off the top 
of my head, I recall two instances where women were shown in very 
authoritative positions, and later in the show those women were shown to 
be real ding-dongs.  I'm thinking of:
    (1) Admiral Satie, in "the drumhead."  She was an *ADMIRAL*, highly
respected, etc. etc.  But after a go-round with Picard she was "exposed
for the paranoid dingbat she really was..."
    (2) Dr. Kyla Marr, in the episode where the Crystalline Entity was
destroyed.  She was originally a very intelligent women (other than
her prejudice against Data), but as the show wore on she exhibited more
and more signs of mental breakdown due to her guilt about losing her son.

In both of the previous episodes, these women were also older (gray
hair, probably in their 60's).  I hope we're not also trying to be
ageist.

And I can think of more examples where women were not shown in a real
flattering light; how about "The Perfect Mate" where the woman's only
reason for existence was to please men?!  Even in "The Game", Robin
Leffler was originally smart and independent, but of course late in the
show she had to succumb to the Game so that Wesley could save the ship
by himself....

I know there have also been plenty of men shown as idiots on the show, but
I'm trying to remember when a woman was portrayed as *REALLY SMART* or
competent or a good female role model.  Can anyone help me with this?

And, don't get me wrong.  I'm really not trying to flame about sexism
or ageism.  I'm just trying to find some good examples of women as 
competent role models, and so far I can't remember any having emerged.
I'm just curious about this, not trying to start anything.

- Jennifer
  jkl@md.fsl.noaa.gov
From: aaronm@ccmail.orst.edu (Mithran Aaron)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: The Borg
Date: 16 Dec 92 05:51:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: ccmail.aaronm.20.0
Organization: Oregon State University Libraries
NNTP-Posting-Host: standdx26.kerr.orst.edu

Does anyone out there like the Borg?

I personally find them to be a very interesting idea for a society.

I also like them.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: pettypi@gaul.csd.uwo.ca (Carl Pettypiece)
Subject: Re: Beverly heats up... *POSSIBLE SPOILERS*
Organization: Computer Science Dept., Univ. of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 05:23:01 GMT


>
>>It is my sincere belief that Beverly's induction of umaats in the Ferengi
>
>Not only that ... what about the *clothes* she was wearing?!?!?!?
>She was covered from toe to neck ... Daimon Solok was howling!!
>
>(* ref. the episode about the Keeper of the Gate, and the Ferengi
>away team started falling all over themselves 'cos Tasha was in a
>uniform ...)

So...just how grateful was Beverly, hmmm??  (-:

>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Je me souviens ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Gary L. Dare
>> gld@cunixd.cc.columbia.EDU 		Support NAFTA
>> gld@cunixc.BITNET			 Eat Mexican  (El Teddy's ad)


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Pettypiece (pettypi@gaul.csd.uwo.ca)        Disclaimer:  Hell, I don't
Department of Computer Science                   even know if these are MY
University of Western Ontario                    opinions!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: schouten@sp95.csrd.uiuc.edu (Dale Schouten)
Subject: Re: Fistful of Datas Locale
Organization: Center for Supercomputing R & D
	<SCHOUTEN.92Dec9160904@sp95.csrd.uiuc.edu>
	<1992Dec9.234149.627@ncar.ucar.edu>
	<1992Dec11.163404.989@mksol.dseg.ti.com>
Date: 14 Dec 92 23:00:03

In article <1992Dec11.163404.989@mksol.dseg.ti.com> rbeck@mordordseg.ti.com (Ron Beck) writes:
> It's also possible that they used the set in Old Tucson.  This area
> has been the scene of many westerns.  

Just my HO, I don't think so.  None of it (flora, fauna, mountains,
sets) looked the least bit familiar.

`Gotta see the lights of Tucson!'
Dale Schouten
schouten@uiuc.edu
From: mcohen@vax.clarku.edu
Subject: Alert in transporter beam?
Organization: Clark University
Date: 14 DEC 92 23:39:33 GMT

Ok, I'm sitting here watching a repeat of the episode where "Broccoli" goes 
nutso through the transporter beam.  Its obvious to me, for the first time, 
you are quite alert while having your molecules zapped through space.

Now in the next episode, Scotty is rescued after spending a good number of 
years in the transporter.  Don't you think, besides the fact you might get a 
little hungry if you were at least mentally alert for 75 years on end, 
wouldn't you GO NUTS!?!?

Just a thought.

/--------------------------------------------------------------------------\
| > <    Mitch Cohen * Multimedia consultant * MCohen@vax.clarku.edu       |
|  ^          Any opinions expressed are clearly not my own.               |
|  v     I'll come up with something intelligent to put here later.        |
\__________________________________________________________________________/
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: rccarm00@nx19.mik.uky.edu (ron c carman)
Subject: Re: Promos for: CHAIN OF COMMAND Pt.2 (#237) +DSN
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
X-Path: nx19.mik.uky.edu!rccarm00
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 23:58:02 GMT

dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams) writes:

>This also gives Paramount and the local stations plenty of time to hype up
>the new series (such as with the DSN promo included in Chain of Command).


>DEEP SPACE NINE promo:
>  At the edge of the final frontier, it waits...
>  For an untested crew to begin an unprecedented journey.
>  But most of all, it waits for you.
>  Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.  
>  In January the wait will be over.

     Here in Lexington, this promo did NOT air during the episode.
To my knowledge, it has never aired here.  So far, our local station
is not scheduled to carry DSN, because they -- in their words --
"could not reach an agreement with Paramount".  I rather think that
sucks.. but I assume this is the reason the DSN promo was cut.
     Isn't this kind of thing covered in the non-tampering rules??
I want to be able to complain to someone about this.. ;-)

RC Carman

--
/=======================================================================\ 
|     Ron C. Carman          ||  Quantum physicists get all the girls.  |
| rccarm00@mik.uky.edu       ||  Al.  Is he live, or is he a hologram?  | 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Subject: chain of command...?
Reply-To: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 12 Dec 92 22:45:55 EST

This week's repeat was Man of the People.  However, I forget to check
what the promo was for the next episode!  I don't trust me TV guide
because I remember it screwed up with The Game last year...  My TV guide
still says that Relics is the next episode.  Please oh PLEASE someone
confirm this or not!  Is it going to be Relics or Chain of Command next
week?


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jason Wong
Calling from Markham, Ontario CANADA.  It's not cold though!  :-)
INTERNET E-MAIL: bernie.wong@canrem.com


... I've always wanted to meet you, Captain.  Chang
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.11
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: malj8589@mach1.wlu.ca (maljkovich john)
Subject: Re: Ferengi History question
Organization: Wilfrid Laurier University
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 04:56:31 GMT


From what I remember (and I may be wrong) but Picard never saw the face of
the enemy who was attacking him.  'They refused to answer all hails'.  I
thought all that was pretty well explained in the episode where the
stargazer was returned.

m

From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:37:03 GMT
Subject: Re: Troi & her uniform...possible spoilers
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current

You are making the mistake of looking at this with human values.  You must
get inside the Cardasian mind before you can begin to relate to them.  Cpt.
Jellico has done this and knows how to treat these bozos.  Personally I don't
see why we bother.  Lets get Capt. Maxwell and the Phoenix out of mothballs
and set them loose on the border.
From: sdt8s@curry.edschool.Virginia.EDU (Steve Tilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: The Borg
Date: 20 Dec 92 22:09:58 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

cboerm48@ursa.calvin.edu  writes:
> hodge3726@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:
> >> Does anyone out there like the Borg?
> >> I personally find them to be a very interesting idea for a society.
> >> I also like them.
> 
> >You are also a very boring and stupid person and you will be stimulated.
> 
> like or dislike of the Borg is irrelavant. Stupidity is futile. Boring
> is futile. You will be assimilated.
> 
> 			CtB
> --
> Oh, I hate tryin' to be witty in these things!	   |
> So I'm even going to try. And if you don't like it,|
> Tough! 	(Thank you had have a nice day)	         |    cboerm48@calvin.edu
> 																   |

.sigs are irrelevant. Hate is irrelevant. Witty is irrelevant.
Nice day is irrelevant. cboerm48@calvin. is irrelevant.
Irrelevant is irrelevant. I am irrelevant. He is irrelevant.
She is irrelevant. Wouldn't you like to be irrelevant too.

Irrelevantly
Steve
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
In my opinion, anyone interested in improving        | Steve Tilson
himself should not rule out becoming pure energy.    | sdt8s@virginia.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.current:20571 rec.arts.startrek.misc:12734
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Press Release - #236: Chain of Command, Part I
Date: 15 Dec 92 06:26:15 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout


Chain of Command, Part I

Episode #236			uplink dates: 12/12/92, 12/13/92



                           _S_P_E_L_L_I_N_G_S

	metagenic weapons
	Celtris Three


				_C_A_S_T

	Captain Jean-Luc Picard			Patrick Stewart
	Commander William Riker			Jonathan Frakes
	Lieutenant Commander Data		Brent Spiner
	Dr. Beverly Crusher			Gates McFadden
	Counselor Deanna Troi			Marina Sirtis
	Lieutenant Commander Geordi LaForge	LeVar Burton
	Lieutenant Worf				Michael Dorn

	Gul Madred				David Warner
	Captain Jellico				Ronny Cox
	Admiral Nechayev			Natalija Nogulich
	Gul Lemec				John Durbin
	Solok					Lou Wagner
	

	Teleplay by:				Frank Abatemarco
	Story by:				Ronald D. Moore
	Directed by:				Robert Scheerer



_P_R_O_G_R_A_M_ _H_I_G_H_L_I_G_H_T_S

	STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION: "Chain of Command" -- After resigning
	his command to participate in a dangerous secret mission, Captain
	Picard is taken hostage by the Cardassians.


_T_V_ _G_U_I_D_E_ _A_D_S

	CARDASSIAN CRISIS!

	Picard is kidnapped after resigning his post to lead a dangerous
	mission!


_T_V_ _L_O_G_ _L_I_S_T_I_N_G_S

	Picard kidnapped by the Cardassians/STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: arwen@wam.umd.edu (Lorien Banana Schroeder)
Subject: Re: The New Captain - CoC *Spoilers*
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:20:12 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.170159.898@tin.monsanto.com> lesnyd@monsanto.com (Larry E. Snyder) writes:
>Spoilers for Chain of Command follow 32 lines...
>
>
>For those who have experienced a change in management or leadership, where
>management styles were dramatically different, this episode really rings
>true. Captain Jelico's opiniated, overconfident, rude approach to commanding
>the Big E is sure different from the quiet, open-minded leadership of Picard.
>Needless to say, the crew has a difficult time, both accepting the loss of
>Picard and accepting the new stle of Jelico.
>
>Riker must really be upset, since he has gone from the good graces of Picard
>to Jelico's blacklist. Again, I've had that happen, and it's hard to handle.
>
>One scene pretty much sums it up: when Jelico is leaving the bridge and turns
>and says, "And get that fish out of my ready room." Litle bits of Picard
>are being removed.

So, is Toonces a Jelico cat?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: durrant@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (unknown)
Subject: Re: TOS/Uhura
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 04:07:00 GMT

In article <9212152155.AA12626@enet-gw.pa.dec.com>, d_ellis@ricks.enet.dec.com (David Ellis  15-Dec-1992 1655) writes:
> 78313@novell1.rz.fht-mannheim.de (Christian_Karpp) asks:
> 
> > I saw one episode where Lt. Uhura wears a _yellow_ uniform.
> > can someone please tell me the name of that ep.?
> 
> There were two:  "Mudd's Women" and "The Corbomite Maneuver".
> These were the first two episodes filmed with Nichelle Nichols.
> 
> ----
> David  J  Ellis
> Digital Equipment Corporation,          Semiconductor Engineering Group
> 77 Reed Road, Hudson MA 01749           Mailstop HLO2-3/D11         
> Internet: d_ellis@ricks.enet.dec.com    Phone: (508) 568-4393 


Just a question. . . Is this really current?  Does it belong here?
Take it someplace else!  This group has enough traffic as it is!

Christine
		My teen angst bullshit has a body count.
			--Heathers

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: srheault@alfred.carleton.ca (Steven Rheault Kihara)
Subject: Re: Who is Ronny Cox
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 06:52:29 GMT

Let's not forget that he played George Apple in the short-lived early
70s Waltons rip-off TV family drama called "Apple's Way."
                           
Steve Rheualt Kihara
A man who remembers but wishes he doesn't   
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: gp2001@andy.bgsu.edu (Greg Pallenik)
Subject: Re: What do you mean the new Capt. is mean??? (Spoilers)
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: Bowling Green State University
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 23:46:25 GMT

In article <BzAJI8.A31@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, analog@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
(Mike Monahan) wrote:
> 
> In article <BzADDt.Lw7@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens) writes:
> >Out of all the obviously mean orders the new capt.  
> >has given, this is the only one I wished had been given on the first  
> >episode. (referring to the Capt.'s order to Troi)
> 
> 
> 	Obviously mean.  Like actually making LaForge work, or Riker alter
> his precious duty roster?  Come on, he's actually turning the big E into
> the ass kicking warship that it should have been in the first place.
> Just because Jelico doesn't sit down with every whining crew member (like
> Troi) and listen to their side before he tells them that they're wrong and
> he's right, doesn't make him a jerk.  

I agree.  The group I was watching with all consideder the new capt. to be
an "asshole".  I did everything I could to convince them that the Capt. is
getting the ship prepared for war.  Doesn't anyone stop to think that he
may have orders  to do what he's doing?  Hi is the captain, dammit, he
doesn't have to justify his actions!

Greg.  Flame at will, er Greg.
From: dascoser@cybernet.cse.fau.edu (david serchay)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Chain of Command
Date: 20 Dec 92 06:05:07 GMT
Organization: Cybernet BBS, Boca Raton, Florida

Great episode. One question though. Who played the Cardassian negotiator?
He also pulled off a great perfomance.

Dascoser
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: qtm2w@Virginia.EDU ("Quinn T. McCord")
Subject: Re: Female CO for the E  II
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 01:44:43 GMT


	Presumably, Leah Brahms, one of the designers of the
new Enterprise, qualifies as "really smart".

					-Quinn
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: mholtz@sactoh0.sac.ca.us (Mark A. Holtz)
Subject: Re: Where are LIST OF LISTS???
Organization: Sacramento Public Access Unix
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 06:51:04 GMT

In <92345.161315SCJ101@psuvm.psu.edu> <SCJ101@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>          Where have all the "list of lists" articles gone? I couldn't find
>them in any of the groups and I know I've seen them before. They were easily
>the most helpful guide to Star Trek: TNG info.

The December 1st edition of the LoL will be reposted on the 16th,
along with an updated upcoming episodes.
-- 
      Next Time on.....ROBERTO!       <:> UUCP: PacBell.COM! -> mholtz!sactoh0
                                      <:>     ucbvax!csusac! /
      Quantum Leap fans who enjoy     <:> Internet: mholtz@sactoh0.sac.ca.us
     Quantum Leaps new theme song     <:>  Fidonet: Mark Holtz@1:203/90.1701
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current