HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tw5232@albnyvms.bitnet (Teddy Wang)
Subject: Re: OS/2
Reply-To: tw5232@albnyvms.bitnet
Organization: University of NY at Albany
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 92 10:41:11 GMT

In article <13603@mindlink.bc.ca>, George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca (George Lin) writes:
>> Quentin Snow writes:
>> An Operating System that takes 4+ megs just to run at a suficient speed??
>> This seems a bit rediculous to me..  I dont care how "great" os/2 is, to
>> take that much memory -- there is no excuse except .. IBM ..
>
>
>Then I guess CBM doesn't have any excuses either.

The Amiga has a nice compact OS, even for modern OS's (But then again, MS-DOS
is also a compact OS-Program Loader.)  

>
>Amiga + Unix > 4 Megs
>In fact, when I used to work for Commodore, the Unix boxes we had were all 16
>Megs.

Yes but take a look at the size of some of the executables which your UNIX
boxes take up!  GNU Emacs is over 1.5 megs, anything using X is at least over a
meg.  You really cannot compare UNIX with a micro operating system like the
Amiga, the only real advantage the Amiga would have over such a portable, fast,
universally accepted OS is in hard disk space saved!

>
>OS/2 is a great OS.
>It is extremely stable.  (definately much more stable than AmiDos 2.0)
>
>The multitasking is very smooth.  Of course, the video on my 486 still seems
>slower than an unaccelerated A2000, but the overall speed and compatibility
>(with DOS, Windoze) is incredible.
>Things that I've done for years my Amiga, such as formating one floppy and
>reading from a second floppy drive, I can finally do on my PC.
>

Don't forget that OS/2 is also a full 32 bit OS, like modern UNIX.  But I'd
think twice about saying OS/2 is EXTREMELY stable.  I've crashed OS/2 on 
several occasions (But then again I crash DECStations regularly.)

>One thing I really like about OS/2 (compared with AmigaDos), is that OS/2
>doesn't run out of memory.  If RAM is full up, then the OS will cache unused
>programs to the HD.

So Commodore, when are you going to bless us with virtual memory?!?!?!  Windows
has had it since v3.0, OS/2 has had it since v1.3, and Macintosh has even had
it for a year!  

     ////////  
       //                                             twang@thor.albany.edu
      //                                              TWANG@ALBNYVMS.BITNET
     //  eddy Wang                                    TW5232@ALBNYVMS.BITNET
    //   Computer Art and Animation at SUNY Albany
         New Illusions      Albany, NY                  "Increase the Peace..."
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: om@dist.dist.unige.it (Mauro Migliardi. DIST University of Genoa. Italy. +39 010 3532709/510278)
Subject: Re: AMAX II problem: HELP! I'm soooo frustrated!
Keywords: AMAX & HDrives
Organization: DIST --- Universita` di Genova
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:56:56 GMT


Hi netters,
	I need your help. I have a 3000 with a IBM SCSI HD, I made a
partition named AMAX0 and tried to use it with amaxII. I put the scsi.amhd
file in devs: and made the partition automount && reserved using hdtoolbox,
then I started AMax. Ta dah! The HD led switches on and then.... blet!
Nothing more. It stays on indefinitely, I have to reboot the whole thing.
How am I wrong? What should I do? May anyone please help me?
Thanks in advance. Bye.
--
*Mauro Migliardi,PhD student at Department*If I, as I'm not you, cannot know *
*of Comunications and Computer Science    *what you know, then you as you are*
*University of Genoa (ITALY)		  *not a fish, cannot understand the *
*E-mail om@dist.dist.unige.it		  *fishes' happiness. (Huei Tzu) *
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: cpw8034@zeus.tamu.edu (ALAN CHIPIN WEN (409)693-2924)
Subject: Re: EMPLANT Update.
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 16:26:00 GMT

> 
>Correct, and our first ads coming out will also be in the same issue as
>the review....which is either the Sept or Oct issues (I dont remember
>which) of Amazing Computing and Amiga World.
> 
>Jim Drew - Vice President, Utilities Unlimited, Inc.

Bravo!!!  Thanks.  This is going to be in Toaster proportions when they get a
hold of this.  BTW, will it have as much coverage as the toaster and the likes?

alan
From: Jarrett_Volzer@neonate.amiga.atl.ga.us (Jarrett Volzer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: OS/2
Date: 22 Jul 92 19:21:04 GMT
Organization: The Village BBS

Oleg Rovne:
 
I can't get this to quote your message right now, but a "16 bit OS" measn a
16 bit operating system.  PC's up through the 286 can handle 16 bits of
data at one time.  "32 bit OS" is a 32 bit operating system, which in the
PC world is anything 386 or better.  An OS that is called 32 bit can
directly deal with that much information at one time.  Does this help?
 
Jarrett

Jarrett_Volzer@neonate.amiga.atl.ga.us

-- Via DLG Pro v0.992
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: ICARUS@PUCING.PUC.CL
Subject: Driver for an IBM-Proprinter X24E
Organization: Universidad Catolica
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 17:19:28 GMT

 Hello amiga'ers , I want to know if somebody knows an ftp site(s) of where I
can find a driver for my IBM PRoprinter x24E, it's a 24 pin printer and I can
not use all the capacities of this printer, I just have a driver for an 9 pin
printer.
  If somebody can help me I'll be very glad....Please Drop me a Line to :
 
 
ICARUS@PUCING.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: OS/2
From: tfarmer@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz (Thomas Farmer)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 08:19:26 GMT
Organization: The Cave MegaBBS, Public Access Usenet, Wellington, NZ

In article <13603@mindlink.bc.ca> George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca (George Lin) writes:
>> Quentin Snow writes:
>> An Operating System that takes 4+ megs just to run at a suficient speed??
>> This seems a bit rediculous to me..  I dont care how "great" os/2 is, to
>> take that much memory -- there is no excuse except .. IBM ..

OS/2 needs 8MB and it ran a lot better on a machine with 12MB...

WB2.04 is running fine in 4MB and I ran out of memory for the first
time for months only a few days ago... (I tried to load a1.4MB text
file.)

>OS/2 is a great OS.
>It is extremely stable.  (definately much more stable than AmiDos 2.0)

You obviously haven't used it as much as me. I find that Workbench 2.0
is not only more stable, it also has a lot less recoverable bugs.

OS/2 has improved since I installed the BLKICO fix.

>One thing I really like about OS/2 (compared with AmigaDos), is that OS/2
>doesn't run out of memory.  If RAM is full up, then the OS will cache unused
>programs to the HD.

Well, I have 8MB on a Windows machine and never use swapping. I have
4MB on an Amiga and very rarely need more.

On the other hand, if OS?2 didn't have swapping they might have had to
made it a bit tighter... :-)

ObEmulation : What's the best Spectrum emulator? I have Peter
McGavin's one but it still has not very good sound support. (Anyway,
the one I have is a debugging version with funny screen borders... :-)
-- 
tfarmer@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz +64-4-499-3832 (home) //         Beagle
tfarmer@datamark.co.nz +64-4-233-8186 (work)    _ //  Compubuild 486
    I ain't nothin' but a Hound Dog             \\/ Amiga 3000 25/40
From: bkwilli@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Bryan Williams)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: EMPLANT and Game Console emulation (was Re: EMPLANT)
Date: 24 Jul 92 04:02:33 GMT
Organization: The Great Beyond

Hmmm. The NEO GEO idea seems silly. I suppose you want to pirate the games from 
NEO-GEO on the Amiga-NEO GEO hypothetical machine???
 
--- ie, otherwise, you can shuck out the $200+ for games for that puppy. I don't
see the cost benefit... most humans can't afford NeoGeo.
 
 
I'm not accusing you of piracy, BTW, but otherwise, why emulate it?
 
I have heard that console machine piracy is going on in Europe. They must be 
doing something funny. Can't be using EPROM copies, they'd cost more than the 
originals.... that's a nice thing about ROMs-- mask ones cost $4 per cartridge 
a couple megabytes, where EPROM would be $100 or more for a couple meg.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: harley@tt.com (Scott Drysdale)
Subject: Re: Connecting 3.5 Drive to A2088
Organization: Telecommunications Techniques Corporation, Germantown MD
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 17:50:38 GMT

In article <13846@mindlink.bc.ca> Tom_Gowdyk@mindlink.bc.ca (Tom Gowdyk) writes:
>I just bought a 3.5 inch 1.44 meg floppy drive to run on my A2088 bridge board.
>Can anyone tell me how to do this, I can't seem to make it work.  I am running
>the following system:
>
>Amiga 2000HD with 2091 controller, Quantum 40 meg Hard Drive, 7 megs of RAM,
>A2088 Bridgeboard with a SOta 286i Accelerator card.

you can't do 1.4 meg drives on the 2088.  it doesn't have the right floppy
controller.  the most you'll get out of the drive is 720K.

>Any help appreciated.
>Tom Gowdyk

  --Scotty
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
scott drysdale (harley@tt.com, ...!uunet!debbie!harley), software mercenary.
formerly mr. bridgeboard @ cbm.  soon to be a seaman recruit in the us navy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: dandreat@nyx.cs.du.edu (David Lee Andreatta)
Subject: Problems with 2088 virtual disk access?
Followup-To: poster
Summary: Virtual disk access broken when FASTMEM is active
Keywords: jlink, janus, bridgeboard
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 11:49:26 GMT

I am experiencing a problem with the use of the bridgeboard 2088 (virtual) disk 
access utilities; jlink, aread, and awrite, when installed in a machine with 
Xetec memory expansion.  Use of any of these utilities results in a PC side 
lockup.  However, auto-booting works fine, until the lockup occurs.  Subsequent
hard resets of the PC result in loss of access to the Amiga side drives.  (Yes,
PCDisk is active. :-))  The only way to get things working again is to cycle 
power.

An interesting tidbit; when the Xetec memory is hardware disabled (on a Xetec 
Fastcard+ with SCSI drive and memory expansion) everything works fine!  

I have tried the 2088 board in both Rev. 4.x and Rev. 6.x A2000's.  The 2088
is a Rev. 3, 1986, board with PC BIOS Rev. 3.4.  The Janus handler is Ver. 2.63
and the Janus library is Ver. 33.1.  Amiga OS is WB1.3 with 1M CHIP (on the 
newer machine) and 2M FAST.

The 2088 actually belongs to a friend.  He has tried the official channel of
support, starting with local dealers and ending with CATS, via phone.  They 
requested he send a letter, which was answered after six months with "... 
please call CATS at ...".  He did receive a new Amiga side install disk with
Janus, etc. from a local dealer but that's about it. If a new BIOS, etc., is 
needed, please be ready for a little hacking, as I don't think he will try 
official channels again. ;-)

If anyone has experienced this problem, or something similar, and has been able
to resolve it, I would appreciate hearing about it. Thank you in advance for 
your assistance, and please reply via email.

Dave Andreatta
dandreat@nyx.cs.du.edu
From: sunil@lsl.co.uk
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: EMPLANT Update.
Date: 28 Jul 92 09:06:55 GMT
Organization: Laser-Scan Ltd., Cambridge

In article <27JUL199218580460@venus.tamu.edu>, cpw8034@venus.tamu.edu (ALAN CHIPIN WEN (409)693-2924) writes:
> In article <1992Jul27.213917.25556@sbcs.sunysb.edu>, mrubino@engws10.ic.sunysb.edu (Michael N Rubino) writes...
>> 
>>I called Utilities Unlimited today to see what was up with EMPLANT.  Mr. Drew
>>was not in (he's only there on Fridays) but the secretary told me that
>>EMPLANT will be available around August 15th.  I'll call Jim on Friday to get
>                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^
Quote from:
	CU Amiga, August edition, page 10, bottom righthand corner of page.

PS please read "#" as "Pounds"

[start quote]
Downward compatibility?

Utilities Unlimited are planning to ship another Mac emulator into the UK via
distributors BlitSoft. Following broadly along the lines of the old A-Max 
cartridge from Readysoft, the Emplant requires the user to purchase Apple ROMs
to enable the unit to work. The hardware is in card form for the 
A1500/2000/3000 but can be fitted to the expansion bus of the A500 (No A600 
version is planned). The software will allow control of the serial, SCSI and 
Appletalk ports on the card and roughly simulates an Apple IIx (although an 
accelerator card and at least 2Mb of memory are recommended.

'Whilst working on the Sybil project for A-Max, Utilities Unlimited decided that
they could come up with a better emulator by themselves' said a spokesman for
Blitsoft. 'It's a very  nice platform and the hardware will also be used for a 
PC emulator in the near future.'

The unit will come with different hardware configurations and will cost from 
around #165 to #205 without the ROMs. Blitsoft are on (England) 0908 666265

[end quote]

compare the price to $209 + $5 US shipping from UU
From: Scotty@freemf.UUCP (Scotty)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: Questions AMAX II with 2.5 Software
Distribution: world
Date: 27 Jul 92 09:53:28 PDT
Organization: Not an Organization

In a message dated Mon 27 Jul 92  2:31, Brianr@tekig1.pen.tek.com (brian E 
wrote:

 BE>  - the Commodore 68020 CPU accelerator shipped with A2500s.

  New A2500s from commodore are shipped with 25mhz 68030s, these work fine.
If you are looking in the used market tho, beware.  *(Scotty)*

-- Via DLG Pro v0.992

John (Scotty) Freeland  ---  scotty@freemf.eskimo.celestial.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: anil@cs.titech.ac.jp (anil)
Subject: !!!!!!!!!!!!!FSPCK@acad3.BITNET!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Organization: Tokyo. Inst of Tech
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 02:51:14 GMT

Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1992 15:49 -0800
>From: FSPCK@acad3.BITNET
Subject: AMAXII+   <==> Soft.pc/at
To: anil@cs.titech.ac.jp
X-Envelope-To: anil@cs.titech.ac.jp
X-Vms-To: in%"anil@cs.titech.ac.jp"

X-News: acad3.alaska.edu comp.sys.amiga.emulations:4128

>From: anil@cs.titech.ac.jp (anil)
>Subject:AMAXII+   <==> Soft.pc/at
>Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1992 19:15:36 GMT
>Message-ID:<BrCDI0.1u6@cs.titech.ac.jp>

>I have an original copy of soft PC/AT which I am willing to loan to someone IFF
>you will check it out and see if it runs OK with AMAXII +
>If it runs OK then I will run out and buy AMAX.
>-----------
>One condition:
>I get my soft.pc/at back.
>It is not copy protected...so it's up to your concience what you do with it.
>replies by e-mail please
>Anil
>PS: Soft.pc/at is an IBM emulator for the Mac
>anil@cs.titech.ac.jp
>---------

I tried to mail you,but the mail just comes back..
please give me an address (postal) so I can send it to you, and phone number etc..

Anil
Tel: 81-44-434-4450 (9am-11pm JAPAN TIME)
Fax 81-44-411-9210 (anytime)

Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: tka4092@athena.mit.edu (Terry Alkasab)
Subject: EMPLANT Poll...
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:36:12 GMT

I have a quick question.  

How many people out there are going to be spending some money on
Macintosh emulation this year, might spend it on AMAX II+, but are
waiting on EMPLANT to see if it's better?

E-mail responses, please.  I'm kind of curious.

BTW, I'm trying with all of my might not to insinuate anything.  I'm
probably not doing very well, am I?


--
Terry Alkasab			      :	``Sweeney was smooth; Sweeney was
tka4092@athena.mit.edu		      :	  subtle; Sweeney would blink and
DISCLAIMER:  Disclaimer?!  I just met :	  rats would scuttle...''
     her!  (Do you think she'd mind?) :	--Stephen Sondheim's _Sweeney_Todd_
From: simon@ivem.uucp (Simon Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: First to ask about Emplant?
Date: 22 Jul 1992 17:55:02 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego
NNTP-Posting-Host: ivem.ucsd.edu

In article <1992Jul21.223346.8173@nntp.uoregon.edu> gpotts@hebb.uoregon.edu writes:
>There was a posting in two other .amiga newsgroups by someone looking to hire
>an Amiga programmer for some unspecified tasks. Jim Drew, president of
>UU, replied in public to this post saying he'd like the job. If I were working
>day and night to get a product with the potential market of EMPLANT out the
>door, I wouldn't be looking for new projects.
>
>--geoff

If this is true, then I wonder about the validity of Emplant, especially
since he sould be busy making other computer emulators for Emplant.  Also,
why would the VICE PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT of his own company want a job in 
another company?

You figure it out...
Hope Emplant comes out though :)
-Simon

-- 
*   Simon Lee              *   Microscopy and Imaging Resource          *
*   simon@ivem.ucsd.edu    *   Intermediate Voltage Electron Microscopy *
*   sulee@ucsd.edu         *   UC San Diego, Dept. of Neuroscience      *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: jpr@sun4.lri.fr (Jean-Pierre Riviere)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re:  A3000 <-> IBM disks
Date: 22 Jul 92 11:09:04 GMT
Organization: Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique


In article <pianoman.00gf@misseye.uucp>, pianoman@misseye.uucp (Alan D.
Ray) writes:
|> In article <Jarrett_Volzer.04qw@neonate.amiga.atl.ga.us>
|> Jarrett_Volzer@neonate.amiga.atl.ga.us (Jarrett Volzer) writes:
|> >In a message dated Wed 14 Jul 92  8:48,
|> 89u7491@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au
|> >wrote:
|> >
|> >
|> > > Hi there netland.
|> > >  What is the best way to read IBM disks on an A3000. Dos2Dos V3
|> > > will not work. Does crossdoss work OK ?
|> > >  George
|> >
|> >The absolute BEST file transfer program to go from PC to Amiga disks
|> is a
|> >PD program called Multidos.  This is much easier that CrossDos or
|> the other
|> >because you just put either type of disk in the drive, and the
|> program
|> >knows which type it is and you can do a normal file copy (from CLI,
|> or Dir.
|> >Opus/Diskmaster etc.)  I don't know for sure if it works with the
|> 3000 or
|>                                              
|> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|> 
|> It does, and in fact, I deleted CrossDos (which I bought), and now
|> use
|> MultiDos. Works fine on my 3000, and is much easier to use than
|> CrossDos
                                          
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't know crossDos but I know messyDos and multiDos, and, under 2.0,
the
latter is really a very nice thing.
So...
Why do you think it is said  that CrossDos is now included in WB2.1 and
not
multiDos ?
Perhaps cause WB 2.1 is a genuine C= products ;-) ?

Frankly, you from C= : WHY ??!!?
-- 
  Jean-Pierre RIVIERE        |     ///
  LRI - Universite Paris Sud | \\\///
  e-mail : jpr@lri.lri.fr    |  \///
From: fuzzy@netcom.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: Janus Software
Date: 23 Jul 92 04:39:22 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

I am also interested in the latest version of the Janus software for my
A2086 BB.  When I bought my A2000 (used) it came with 1.2 ROM and 1.3
Janus software.  After I upgraded to OS 2.04, the Janus software
wouldn't work quite right.

I called my dealer and they told me to call Commodore.  I called
Commodore and they told me that the latest version under development was
2.1, but it was not quite ready for release.  They also told me to post
on UseNet.  So I'm posting on UseNet.

What is the latest available version, is it 2.04 compatible, and how do
I get it?

-- 
#ifdef TRUE         | Fuzzy Fox                  fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0   | a.k.a. David DeSimone      an207@cleveland.freenet.edu
#define  FALSE  1   | ---------- Bob and Doug Meet Bill and Ted: -----------
#endif              |  "Take off, dude!"  "No way!"  "Yes way, you hoser!"
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: dwjohnso@eos.ncsu.edu (DAVID WILLIAM JOHNSON)
Subject: Test
Originator: dwjohnso@c00037-5pa.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: dwjohnso@eos.ncsu.edu (DAVID WILLIAM JOHNSON)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 15:02:32 GMT


This is only a test.  
We now resume are regularly scheduled EMPLANT bashing.
-- 
******************************************************************
* David Johnson          *         " Reality is                  *
* North Carolina State   *               not all                 *
* Go Pack !!!!           *                  it's cracked         *
* Go Canes !!!!          *                      up to be "       *
***********   146 days and a wakeup   ****************************
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: mjp3783@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Subject: Re: OS/2
Reply-To: mjp3783@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 01:02:50 GMT

In article <1992Jul28.104942.22333@news.iastate.edu>, skank@iastate.edu (George L Skank) writes:
>In article <Jarrett_Volzer.04v8@neonate.amiga.atl.ga.us> Jarrett_Volzer@neonate.amiga.atl.ga.us (Jarrett Volzer) writes:
>>In a message dated Mon 19 Jul 92  1:16, S_fuller@iastate.edu (steve Fuller)
>>wrote:
>> SF> We are running OS/2 2.0 on a PS/2 56sx here at my place of
>> SF> employment. The machine has 4 megs of ram in it and boy it is DOG
>> SF> slow. I think that Windows 3.1 on a 12 MHz 286...
>>You will find that it takes about 8 megs for 2.0 to be of much use at all. 
>>I use 1.3 with 6 megs, and that is plenty, but 2.0 is quite a memory hog. 
>>8 is about the acceptable minimum.
>> 
>>Jarrett_Volzer@neonate.amgia.atl.ga.us
>
>     You've *GOT* to be kidding!  I almost always run my Amiga with with
>three or four applications running and I've only run out of memory *ONCE*!
>I'm running a 2.04 equipped A3000 with 6Megs of memory and the OS copied
>into RAM.  And don't try and tell me that I must not be a *power user*
>either.  2.0 does use more memory than 1.3, no big surprises there, but
>I would not call it a memory hog.  I thought it ran just fine in 4Megs.

In defense of IBM (not a very popular stance! ;-D), they had to come up with a
windowing multi-tasking OS that deals with every possible case on a machine
where ALL programmers went down to the metal (so to speak). Commodore/Amiga
never had to deal with this (they did it right to begin with!;-D). Yeah, it
takes alot of processor time to check every single instruction and make sure
that it isn't doing something it shouldn't be. It takes time to scale what was
designed to be a screen sized image to a window. And to multi-task besides?
Lots of work.
 
	Now: I would never want to run it. I like 2.04 and Motorola and the
Amiga WAY too much. But - before you go comparing os's, keep in mind that the
Amiga OS doesn't do alot of the things that OS/2 (1/2 of an OS?) does. It
doesn't need to. The Amiga OS runs in a very small space - I wonder how many
former 8-bit programmers work/worked on it? ;-D
,------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Watch the starlight shooting for the sky Reaching out to catch   |
| a piece of paradise. Is it true or is it just imaginations?      |
| Visions twist around my mind and bring me shelter from the night |
| Michael Phipps == mjp3783@ritvax.isc.rit.edu (R.I.T.)            |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'
From: wwarner@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Art Warner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: First to ask about Emplant?
Date: 24 Jul 92 03:04:49 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network

Could someone PLEASE send me a copy of the original post "announcing"
the Emplant emulator?  I happened to of missed it.

Thanks.
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William "Art" Warner (317-497-1946)       //\
X-Amiga Student On-Campus Consultant    \X/--\miga makes it happen!
wwarner@en.ecn.purdue.edu             IBM, Apple, Sun, & Next make it expensive!