Newsgroups: talk.politics.mideast
Subject: Re: Answer to nabeel
From: anwar+@cs.cmu.edu (Anwar Mohammed)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 16:06:30 GMT
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon

In article <4047@copper.Denver.Colorado.EDU> aaldoubo@copper.denver.colorado.edu (Anisa Alnoor Aldoubosh) writes:
>In article <Bw0Kww.73t.2@cs.cmu.edu> anwar+@cs.cmu.edu (Anwar Mohammed) writes:
>>In article <4034@copper.Denver.Colorado.EDU> aaldoubo@copper.denver.colorado.edu (Anisa Alnoor Aldoubosh) writes:
>>
>>I can scarcely think of anything more ridiculous than Anisa 
>>attacking anyone on this newsgroup for their lack of "wit, 
>>intelligence, or logic."
>
>Your posting just proves my previous point to your supporter, Razooqi.  
>He can't even answer on his own!  You can't even think of anything
>original to say and continue along his lines of undermining another
>person because they do not agree or support your position.  Does that
>call into question your own 'wit' and 'intelligence'?

Don't be a baby, Anisa.  I'm just pointing out that you've resorted to 
worse.  Need I dig up the disgusting insults you've resorted to in your 
posts?  Nah, I'll just remind you of your embarrasing obsession with 
things anal.

>
>From what you state, Anwar, it is even more ridiculous and funny.  You
>don't even use your own brain - your sources, information, and overall
>thinking and philosophy are not even your own!

My sources and information are not my own?  Of course not.  Neither are
yours.  How pathetically ridiculous.  I realize that you may be under
the delusion that you are free to create your own facts (as you have
in the past), but let me enlighten you about something:
unless I am accorded some status as Supreme Keeper of Information,
the information will never be *mine*.  

Let me give enlighten you further:

research\ri-'serch, 'reE-,\
[MF recerche, fr. recerchier to investigate thoroughly, fr. OF, fr. re- 
+ cerchier to search P more at SEARCH]
1: careful or diligent search
2: studious inquiry or examination; esp: investigation or experimentation 
aimed at the discovery and interpretation of facts, revision of accepted
theories or laws in the light of new facts, or practical application of
 such new or revised theories or laws
3: the collecting of information about a particular subject 

No pay attention.  In order to fulfill the definition of Research,
I have gone to those people who know best, or who have best access 
to the information I need.  The sources of information gathered in the
course of research a topic do not own or have a right to take credit
for the conclusions drawn from this information.   For example, UPI
does not own my opinions on the elections in Kuwait, despite the fact
that I've used them as a source of information.  Likewise for  your
opinion regarding the election and AP.  

It should now be easy for you to understand that despite the fact that
we don't concoct the information on our own, the conclusions and
opinions we form independently as a result of these facts and figures are 
the intellectual property of each of us alone.  It is true that the 
best source I have for information regarding Kuwaiti foreign aid 
is a member of my family.  Rather than going to dig up Central Bank,
IMF, and World Bank reports in the Library, I happen to know someone
who has all this information and can fax it to me.  Would you begrudge
me the chance to use this incredible resource?  I mean, outside of the
ridiculous rhetorical ploy you've used here.


>>your adversary.  Witty?  Intelligent?  Logical?  No, just the same 
>>old boring nonsense.
>
>It seems that you are too challenged where your own government stands
>that you didn't bother to post any responses that did not drip of the
>sweet propoganda from your government that you want others to digest.


Responses to what?  To foreign aid questions?  I've posted plenty.
To questions regarding women's rights?  I refer you to my most
recent response to you.  Now we're waiting for you to respond 
to the questions  I've asked regarding Palestinian popular support
for Saddam Hussein. How do you account for the demonstrations and
popular support in Jordan and the West Bank?  Don't you see anything
wrong with these demonstrations?  Or are you all above reproach?

I already think you are a fraud.  I assume rest of this 
newsgroup will think so as well if you persist in dodging the 
question.


>
>>Yawn,
>>anwar
>
>Go back to sleep, Anwar.  You just are speaking incohesively!

"Incohesive"? Now if I were *you*, I might childishly resort (a la
"KuwIAti") to pointing out your use of a word that I can't find in 
Webster's dictionary.  I'll take the higher ground though. Besides 
I admit it....I am a little worried about being accused of getting 
my "overall thinking and philosophy" from Webster's.

>
>Anisa
>
>	"We don't live in Israel.  Not at all.  We live in
>	Palestinian territory.  It's Israeli occupied."
>					Hanan Ashrawi
>

-anwar
-- 
Anwar Mohammed                FREE       Graduate Student
anwar+@cs.cmu.edu              THE       School of Computer Science
Voice: +1 412 268 3043     KUWAITI       Carnegie-Mellon University
Fax:   +1 412 681 5739        POWS       Pittsburgh, PA  15213-3890
Newsgroups: talk.politics.mideast