HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rja@newbirth.Eng.Sun.COM (Robert Allen)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Is the ICOMR1 a good receiver
Date: 18 Dec 1992 17:06:39 GMT
Organization: Sun
NNTP-Posting-Host: newbirth

In article <1992Dec18.155535.4211@cs.rochester.edu> ray@cs.rochester.edu (Ray Frank) writes:
>A friend of mine wants to sell me an ICOM R1 general coverage handheld 
>scanner for 300 dollars.  It covers from 100khz to 1.3ghz with no
>interuptions whatsoever.  It is as small as the new pro-43.  It has so

    It is actually smaller than the PRO43.

>many features that I simply cannot list them here.  A draw back is that
>it only has 100 channels but that isn't too bad.
>My concern is that because of it huge frequency coverage that it may lack
>in the sensitivity and selectivity department.
>Does anyone know anything about this scanner and how it performs and compares
>to some of the other current handheld scanners on the scene today.

   The selectivity is poor.  The sensitivity is high.  This means
   you do get adjacent channel bleedthrough often, which is bad
   for scanning.  However this problem can supposedly be reduced by
   putting a 20 dB attenuator (available with BNC connectors) in line
   with the antenna.  Also, using antennas specific to a given band
   can help.

   The more important issue is that the R1 is truly a receiver, and
   not a scanner.  Scanning is not a one touch operation as it is
   with a PRO43.  If you're really interested in band-scanning, the
   PRO43 is probably a better bet.  However the R1 receives shortwave
   (AM only) up through 1.3 GHz (to 905 MHz guaranteed to spec).  I
   have an R1, but I also have a PRO2006, for home scanning use.  The
   R1 is for mobile use.
--
Robert Allen, rja@sun.com		DISCLAIMER: I said it, not my company.
		    Samuel Addams: Brewer, Patriot.															        "The right to brew beer is the right to be free!" - me
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
Subject: Re: new canadian scanner laws
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
Distribution: alt
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 20:54:57 GMT

dan.mckinnon@canrem.com ("dan mckinnon") writes:
: 
: BN>That, basically, has been the law in the US for quite a few decades. Only
: BN>the penalties are different.  I thought that this was also true in Canada.
: BN>Didn't all they do was increase the penalties?
: 
: 
:        Partly true, but what I find ominous is the line about
: classifying them as private communications. Both in Canada, and the
: U.S., I believe, the airwaves have been considered as public, though
: administered by the government bureaucracies. I think the onus should be
: on people to scramble, if concerned about security.

The airwaves are public, but the communications are private - according to
the US Government.

I agree about the scrambling. But, the government does not want that, it would
make it more difficult, or impossible, for their agencies to monitor radio and
phone traffic if scrambling were used.

Bill
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: linnig@m2000.dseg.ti.com (Mike Linnig)
Subject: Another approach to Fuzz Busting
Organization: Texas Instruments, Defense, Systems and Electronics Group.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 13:54:18 GMT

Since someone mentioned unidens cop car detector...

While trying to think of a solution to the new laser radar it occurred to me
that it would be neat if fuzz busters could talk to each other electronically.

If you had a laser detector, it doesn't help you avoid being caught.  But if
your laser detector sent a transmitted a binary message continuously for five
minutes after being scanned... that message could warn other detectors that a
laser was active in the area.  As two cars passed, they would warn each other
of what was ahead.  At highway speeds that would give you a five mile warning.
Of course, this approach would only work if a major manufacturer built it into
all their detectors.

So, has anyone built such a thing?  
 (maybe I should patent it).

        
--

        -- Mike

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
Mike Linnig, Texas Instruments Inc. | 97.43% of all statistics are made |
Phone: (214) 575-3597  TI MSG: BLIP | up; most of them (83.6 percent)   |
Internet: linnig@m2000.dseg.ti.com  | are wrong.                        |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: petey@selway.umt.edu (Peter G Efroymson)
Subject: Re: Frequencies for Las Vegas
Summary: there are some errors in those freqs....
Organization: University of Montana
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 08:42:30 GMT

Hello. I read the list of Vegas frequencies and found some errors
I live there when not in school so here are the corrections:
FIRE
LVFD, Clark County, N Las Vegas:
Ch-1  453.150 {Battailons 1,4} City stations 1,3,4,
Ch-2  453.100 {Batt 2} Clark county stations 18,12,14,15,21,22,23
Ch-3  453.700 {Batt 3}          "            13,16,17,19,20
Ch-4  453.400 {Batt's 4(city)and 5(nlv)     2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 42, 51,52,53(nlv)
All of these agencies are disp.ed out of the City Fire Station 1
Units are moved to another channel if one is busy with an incident
codes: 421 med aid  402 fire
Henderson  Fire Bc-9   453.275  Fire Stations 91,92,93,94,95 (96)?
Clark county Rural     154.340  "las vegas Dispach" fire stations
70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,79,80,81,82,83
All freqs are repter outputs so you should hear it all
50,000 or so runs in the valley every year
Radio (backup)and chiefs paging/station paging    154.370
Boulder city fire   155.040  fire station 101
Nevada Devision of forestry (contract for the mt Charston area(stucture)
plus wildland      158.895 Kyle base

Nellis AFB Fire    173.5875 or .590
Clark County Civil Defence    158.940
This freq is good for mutual aid traffic in the rural areas
If you are tired of fire stuff:
The North Town Freqs were accurate to a point, NO VHF in use
Mtroplitian Police City PD plus County SHERIFF

f-1 159.150 info
f-2 159.090 S Patrol
f-3 158.850 Rural patrol
f-4 158.745 n patrol
f-5 159.21  tac/ car/car
f-6 159.030 west patrol
f-7 159.790 east patrol
f-8 159.970 rural patrol

mercy ambulance   155.175
nev hiway patrol  42.88(valley patrol) 42.940 (state f-1/rural)
That should about cover the good stuff. E-mail me with any questions
I think these are accurate, though I have not been back in a year.
From: cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: HB-232 Scanner Computer Interface ?
Date: 15 Dec 92 17:45:17 EST
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services

ssar@nmt.edu (Socorro Search and Rescue) writes:
>      I would be interested in opinions on the HB-232
> Scanner/Computer Interface made by Commtronics Engineering for the
> Pro-2004/5/6 from anyone who has purchased or tested this unit.
> This unit was advertised in the October issue of MT, pages 9 and
> 92. Some of the questions I have include the following:
>      1. How well does the autologger work?
>      2. What is meant by an anti-birdie device?
>      3. How robust is the software? (does it have any/many bugs,
>      copy protection)
>                          Thanks to any who respond.
> Please E-mail to the following address: 
> rferraro@zia.aoc.nrao.edu
> Ray Ferraro

Could anybody responding to this-POST the info also?  I tried to get some info
on this package before, and nobody responded.  Any other package for the 200x 
would be welcome info also.

Later...

Brad Steinman
University of Toledo Computer Services
cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
From: tvervaek@col.hp.com (Tom Vervaeke)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Tandy Bashing
Date: 17 Dec 1992 15:26:37 GMT
Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division
Distribution: USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: itchub21.cs.itc.hp.com


One bad store (or a few) does not make a bad company. Here in Colorado
Springs we have a chain of gas stations called Diamond Shamrock. The one
near my office is very professional, helpful, clean, etc.. while the
other one I pass on the way home is generally staffed with insolent,
unshaven, not-from-this-planet types. Does this mean I should never shop
at Diamond Shamrock? No. Does it mean it bothers me, yes.

Radio Shack (or Radio Schlock for the initiated) is a hum-drum place
full of okay merchandise for the masses. I go there for the scanners and
odds and ends of electronics. Most of their sales people (salesdroids)
aren't too knowledgeable, but hey, what do you expect for cheap prices.
Locally we have 3 Shacks and 2 are good and 1 is horrible. Guess who I
avoid.

Regards.
From: tvervaek@col.hp.com (Tom Vervaeke)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: "The subject is extremely OBS"
Date: 16 Dec 1992 17:09:17 GMT
Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: itchub21.cs.itc.hp.com


I'm not sure if this is used everywhere but locally here in Colorado
Springs they use the term "DK" and "Extremely DK". I always have assumed
this meant drunk. Any comments?
From: 95mhn@williams.edu (M. Nanao)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Freqs in the Bay Area?
Date: 16 Dec 1992 19:07:50 GMT
Organization: Williams College, Williamstown, MA
	
	Anyone know of any particularly interesting frequencies or scanner/radio related BBS's in the Bay Area, more specifically, Berkeley?
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: welsh.cs.williams.edu


	Thanks,
		-Max
From: rrichman@access.digex.com (Ray Richman)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: TV antenna Info
Date: 16 Dec 1992 05:50:03 GMT
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: access.digex.com
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

johnw@bluemoon.use.com (John L. Wilkerson Jr.) writes:
: I read in the New issue of Popular Communications how someone wrote in on 
: how he used the Radio Shack portable amplified antenna for his scanner and 
: got increased range.  I went and got one and it works great!  Frequency 
: coverage as indicated will cover about any band needed.  Cat # is 15-1607 
: cost is $24.95.  I had to put on a Motorola Plug for it.
I'll second that... It was in Popular Electronics a while back.  Besides
it's a double deal, W/the correct adapter(s) It'll work on the TV as well
(You know, like when CABLE goes out.. <g>!)  I've picked up a TV station
[on the scanner, w/the R/S ant] that's OVER 100miles away (W/the AMP ON)  
  
:      This antenna does not overdrive the scanner, like some amplifiers 
: I've hacked together.  And for an indoor listener like myself it is a 
: godsend.
:  
: 
: --
:   ___                      _       _     __  _
:  (   >      /            _//      ' )   /   // /
:   __/______/_  ____      /         / / / o // /_  _  __  _   ________
:  / /  (_) / /_/ / <_    /___ o    (_(_/ <_</_/ <_</_/ (_/_)_(_) / / <_
: <_/     johnw@bluemoon.use.com     jwilkerson@delphi.com

--
.............................................................................
!!!  ALSO REMEBER THAT WET WEATHER ROADS ARE SLIPPERY, SO DRIVE SLOWLY  !!!
.............................................................................
Ray E. Richman <rrichman@access.digex.com> | Ray <70712.3403@compuserve.com>
....................^preferred^..............................................
** ALSO PLEASE REMEMBER THIS HOLIDAY SEASON, DO !*NOT*! DRINK AND DRIVE!! **
.............................................................................
From: mattho@goanna.lbl.gov (Matt Ho)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: scanners
Date: 15 Dec 92 20:12:16 GMT
Reply-To: mattho@goanna.lbl.gov (Matt Ho)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.128.56

In article <1g8545INNpev@gaia.ucs.orst.edu> parkerg@osshe.edu (Greg Parker) writes:
>Ok, so I'm new to this group.
>Please forgive if this is a FAQ.
>What should I look for in buying a first time scanner.
>What do I tell my wife as to why we should buy one?

I'm an engineer so I tell mine that I'm interested in the workings of it.

>Can I hear cordless phone calls?

Most scanners can pick up 46-49Mhz (the cordless phone freq.)

>Are their modifications (although I would never do it 
>because it is illegal) so that scanners can pull
>in cell phones?

depends on which you buy. PRO_43, 37 from Radio Shack are capable
of this mod.

>Thanks very much.
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: brett@surfpix.princeton.edu (Brett Borowski)
Subject: BC200xlt CPU pinouts!
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:25:25 GMT

Pinouts for the UC1147 CPU in the Uniden BC200xlt scanner....

Note:  ! means "not,"  If a pin does not have a designation, its destination
is given.  Ex.  "Gnd" means the pin is designated "Gnd" but "to Gnd" means
the pins was unlabeled but connected to ground.  This info comes from my
reading the schematic from the service manual--sorry for any errors!

Pin					Pin
1	CL1 (Keypad)			33	!CS1
2	CL3 (Keypad)			34	!CS2
3	CL4 (Keypad)			35	to Gnd
4	CL5 (Keypad)			36	to Gnd
5	CL6 (Keypad)			37	to Gnd
6	to VCC				38	to Gnd
7	to VCC				39	to Gnd
8	RW1 (Keypad)			40	to Gnd
9	RW2 (Keypad)			41	!SKIP (to Gnd via R(10k)
10	RW3 (Keypad)			42	to Gnd
11	RW4 (Keypad)			43	RESET
12	to VCC				44	!TEST
13	to Gnd				45	OSC1
14	to Gnd				46	OSC2
15	to Gnd via R(unknown)		47	GND
16	!HLT				48	!BL
17	to Gnd 				49	SC
18	to Gnd via R(unknown)		50	!800
19	to Gnd via R(unknown)		51	!UHF (assumed)
20	to Gnd				52	AIR
21	!BUSY				53	VHI
22	!RST				54	VLO
23	!C/D				55	n/c
24	!CS				56	SHIFT
25	VLC3				57	n/c
26	VCC				58	MUTE
27	!SCK				59	!P/OFF
28	SI				60	to VCC
29	SC				61	to VCC
30	PLLEN				62	to VCC
31	!EN1				63	LIGHT
32	!EN2				64	CL2 (assumed) (keypad)

R(unknown) values were not listed on the schematic or in the parts list.
(assumed) labels are based on the implications of other labels on the
schematic.

15, 18, and 19 look like they could be interesting....
And 41 should be interesting to people who don't want their scanner to
"skip" certain frequency ranges....

OSC1 and OSC2 are the feed in for the 400mhz oscillator.  This oscillator
can be replaced with a faster one to increase the scan/search speed...but
it will also decrease your light on-time...  And as far as keeping the
light on all the time...one could connect a switch to the LIGHT pin and
a VCC.  When off, it would function as normal.  When on, the light would
go on and off with the power.  Watch out for short circuits if you do
this...I fried a transistor on mine when I had a VCC to Gnd short....

Happy hacking!

Brett

-- 
brett@surfpix.princeton.edu		(Finger for more info...)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: arny@vesta.unm.edu (L Alan Dye)
Subject: VCR Interference?
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 16:24:42 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

Just a weird occurance which took me by surprise the other day:
I'm sittin' watchin' the boob tube and scanning for the heck of it
and picked up my own TV's reception (through the VCR), getting rough
audio for the channel BELOW the one I was watching. At first, I thought
I was just pickin' up an image of the channel, but the audio changed 
channels as I did! I could only pick up audio on about 5 of our 14 channels,
but it was always audio from 1 channel below the one I was watching!!
We have a satellite hooked into the VCR for reception if this means anything.
Any ideas as to the phenomena which caused this?

Arny
----------------------------------------
Alan Dye

Professional Spectator

Address E-mail to:
      arny@carina.unm.edu
----------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: horak@convex.com (David Horak)
Subject: Re: HELP! FCC and Cordless Phones.
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 16:41:05 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <Dec.17.13.34.50.1992.11475@joes.garage.com> shibumi@joes.garage.com (Kenton A. Hoover) writes:

>Motorola's cordless phone uses frequency inversion as its 'encryption'
>technique.  Frequency inversion is not only barely 'encryuption', its
>trivial to break.  

Everyone says it's trivial to break, easy to break, whatever.....but no
one ever seems to KNOW how. I've never seen it posted.  Poeple say it
only takes $5 to $15 bucks worth of parts, but no one ever says WHAT 
parts.  Would someone care to post  a schematic/parts list or at least
say where a cheap kit is available, complete with address?

David
From: morrejk@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: HELP!  FCC and Cordless Phones.
Date: 12 Dec 92 02:43:38 CST
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY


  Someone on a local bbs here in Bowling Green, Ky is ragging me that
listening to cordless conversations with a scanner is illegal, and
against the FCC.  I was curious to know if anyone out there could shed
some light in my direction.  I told him he was WRONGO! but he
persists with his accusations and warns the entire public about
scanner crazed privacy invaders.  If anyone could email me (since I
don't get to read news too often) with something along the leagalities
of this procedure, I would be eternally grateful.  Basically, anything
having to do with the legal'ness of doing this.  Nothing, please if
this process is illegal, and I am truly a law breaker when scanners
and cordless phones are concerned.

Thanks.

Jon
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: erc@unislc.uucp (Ed Carp)
Subject: Re: Freqs in the Bay Area?
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 05:32:14 GMT

M. Nanao (95mhn@williams.edu) wrote:

: 
: 	Thanks,
: 		-Max

You didn't make it clear what you are looking for, but there are two small
books listing freqs for the Bay Area.  One is for business stuff, the other
is for PS stuff.  Quement Electronics (in the South Bay) and possibly others
carry these small books.
-- 
Ed Carp			erc@apple.com, erc@saturn.upl.com	801/538-0177

Who and what would you be if you went beyond your deepest fears?
From: cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Pro-43 mods
Date: 17 Dec 92 15:46:12 EST
Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services

bennett@erich.triumf.ca (P.Bennett) writes:
> Are there any mods for the Radio Shack Pro-43 Scanner?  If so, wheree would
> I find them?
> 
> Peter Bennett VE7CEI                | Vessels shall be deemed to be in sight
> Internet: bennett@erich.triumf.ca   | of one another only when one can be
> Bitnet:   bennett@triumfer          | observed visually from the other
> TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., Canada     |                          ColRegs 3(k)

I just FTPed an updated collection of mods for the PRO-43 to
garfield.catt.ncsu.edu.  I didn't create them, I just merely collected
them.  I've done all of them, except the audio improvement mod, and
they all work fine.  I'll be doing the audio improvement mod soon, thanx Bob.

BTW: If anybody accidentally cracked their PRO-43 LCD display, it can be
replaced quickly and cheaply.  Rat Shack's parts supplier charged me $5 for a
new one, and it is fairly easy to replace in the unit. [Lucky for me....I have
no warranty anymore....;-) ]

Later...


Brad Steinman
University of Toledo Computer Services
cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
From: cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Crystal mod probs with the 2007-Help!
Date: 11 Dec 92 20:26:35 EST
Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services

I just retried the crystal mod for my 2006, and it locked up the display. 
Turning the unit off and on yields no success.  How do reset the machine so I
can get back to scannin'?

BTW: The original 12Mhz crystal was replaced by a 16.257Mhz crystal a couple of
months ago. Today I tried to replace the 16.257Mhz crystal with a 18Mhz
crystal.  It scanned for awhile, then the display locked up after a key (the 3
key) was pressed.  Replacement of the 16.257Mhz yielded no suceess either.

Please respond ASAP!

Thanx!
 


Brad Steinman
University of Toledo Computer Services
cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
-- 


Brad Steinman
University of Toledo Computer Services
cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: randall@bcstec.ca.boeing.com (Michael Randall)
Subject: Amateur Radio Mod's
Keywords: HAM
Organization: Boeing Psychiatric Ward
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 21:15:50 GMT

Does anyone have the wide band xmit mod for the Kenwood TM-221A xcvr?
I can't locate anyone around here who knows it.

-- 
  Michael W. Randall           | What does a snail say when it rides on the
  randall@bcstec.ca.boeing.com | back of a turtle? "Wheeee!"
   ...!uunet!bcstec!randall    | --Taken from someone on The Comedy Channel
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 10:18:48 EST
From: <MKC107@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: "The subject is extremely OBS"
Distribution: usa

For a few years I have worked for the Los Angeles Police Department.  I am
now a student at Penn State.  But In the L.A.P.D.  our code for violent and
"crazy" individual was 5150.  If an individual (Suspect or not) is acting in
a very violent manner and going crazy (I.E.- P.C.P.  addict), then the call
would go out as a 5150.  Usually a tac sarg on duty that day in that
division would roll to the scene with a taser gun to sub-due the subject.
You will find that different department across the country will use
different codes for everything.  However, usually and as required by law,
all 10 Codes are kept the same.  - Signed M Chang.
From: shibumi@joes.garage.com (Kenton A. Hoover)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: HELP! FCC and Cordless Phones.
Date: 17 Dec 92 21:34:52 GMT
Reply-To: shibumi@joes.garage.com
Organization: Joe's Garage, San Francisco, KA

jennings@ssdt-tempe.sps.mot.com (Tim Jennings) writes:
>If he has a problem with people listening to his phone then he should invest in
>a scrambled phone. The only one I know of is made by Motorola. They claim that
>it cannot be understood on a scanner. I have not tested it so I don't know if
>the claim is correct. This is not to be confused with phones that claim security
>between the base and handset. This only works to keep other handsets from 
>listening in. Of course the Moto phone is about $250.

Motorola's cordless phone uses frequency inversion as its 'encryption'
technique.  Frequency inversion is not only barely 'encryuption', its
trivial to break.  A quality civilian communications security product from 
the company that makes the STA-III?  NOT.

There is a spread-spectrum cordless made by a firm in Oregon that I think
uses digital encryption, so it might be worth looking into.

[Of course, decrypting an encrypted transmission made using the Motorola phone
if you were not the intended receiver is a ECPA (18 USC 2510) violation and
as such a felony.  And no one users scanners to listen to cell phones either,
for the same reason. :-]

| Kenton A. Hoover                                                            |
| P.O. Box 882643                                             +1 415 957 3614 |
| San Francisco, Kalifornia 94188-2643                shibumi@joes.garage.com |
|==============442.075+100=146.850+=444.625+131.8=440.900+114.8===============|
|         Zhivym boistam pochot i chest', a myertvym slava vechnaya!          |
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: tim@ais.org (Tim Tyler)
Subject: Re: ICOM R7100
Keywords: Scanner
Organization: UMCC
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 02:36:36 GMT

In article <Bz471z.p60@austin.ibm.com> ...@cs.utexas.edu:ibmaus!auschs!YOURCOMPUTER.austin.ibm.com!YOURLOGIN writes:
>
>Any opinions on an ICOM R7100?
Yep, it is a great receiver.



-- 
 Tim Tyler      Internet: tim@ais.org  MCI Mail: 442-5735 
P.O. Box 443    C$erve: 72571,1005  DDN: Tyler@Dockmaster.ncsc.mil
Ypsilanti MI    Packet: KA8VIR @KA8UNZ.#SEMI.MI.USA.NA
48197
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner