HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jcjb@mbfs.bio.cam.ac.uk (Jenny Barna)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.medlib-l
Subject: SNOMED/SNOP
Summary: SNOMED on Disk or the internet
Keywords: SNOP, SNOMED
Date: 30 Sep 92 18:22:42 GMT
Reply-To: jr_1@mbuk.bio.cam.ac.uk (Jeremy Rashbass)
Organization: University of Cambridge

Hello,

Can anyone tell me where I can get a copy of either the SNOMED or SNOP
classification on disk?  Does the American Society of Pathologists supply it?


Many thanks.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.medlib-l
Date:         Tue, 29 Sep 1992 10:09:49 EDT
From:         Frederick.C.Pond@DARTMOUTH.EDU
Subject:      Re: Position announcement, University of Washington

--- You wrote:


TITLE:  Outreach Information Services Librarian
	University of Washington Health Sciences Library & Information Center

--- end of quoted material ---

this is one *hot* job for FP....ever been to Seattle?  It's great, 'though a
little depressing in the winter....FP
From: FACKLER@TAMVM1.BITNET (Naomi Fackler)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.medlib-l
Subject: rare journal
Date: 29 Sep 92 16:41:42 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

We have some volumes of Annual Reports to the Takeda Research Laboratory. Osaka
. Japan. v.17-22(1958-1963). These have never been cataloged. I cannot find it
on OCLC. Does anyone want these for their collection? If I do not receive a req
uest by Oct. 15 we will discard these issues. I do not subscribe directly to Me
dLib-L so please respond to me personally.
Naomi Fackler
Medical Sciences Library
Texas A&M University
College Station TX 77843-4462
(409)845-7460
FAX (409) 845-7493
fackler@tamvm1.bitnet
From: smacleod@caper1.uccb.ns.ca (Steve MacLeod)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.medlib-l
Subject: Drug Interaction DataBases
Keywords: drug interaction
Date: 6 Oct 92 17:20:53 GMT
Organization: UCCB

Does anyone have any knowledge of databases available on drugs that would be 
useful in providing a drug interaction screening type of program .. Thanks

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve MacLeod     Microcomputer Technician     smacleod@caper1.uccb.ns.ca
University College of Cape Breton              Sydney, N.S. Canada
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.medlib-l
Date:         Mon, 5 Oct 1992 17:48:56 -0400
From:         Debra Rand <rand@AECOM.YU.EDU>
Subject:      processors for dial-in access

I am interested in talking to anyone who has experience
using J & L Chatterbox processors for dial-in access to a lan.

We are about to implement a network using 8 dial-in ports, 486sx 20mghz
J & L processors, and a MasteRconsole switch to monitor activity on the ports.

Please send me a message with your name, institution, and any comments on
your experience.  I have some questions now, but I hope that we can also
communicate in the future.    Thanks for your help.

Debbie Rand    Library Director
Long Island Jewish Med Ctr
Health Sciences Library
rand@aecom.yu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: 9370-L@HEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"9370-L@HEARN"
Date:         Mon, 28 Sep 92 20:14:20 CET
Reply-To:     gomide@BRFAPQ
Comments:     @FAPQ.FAPESP.BR - @FAPQ%FPSP.HEPNET - @BRFAPQ.BITNET - .BR
              gateway
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was GOMIDE@BRFAPQ
From:         gomide@FPSP.FAPESP.BR
Subject:      Apologies re: InterMeta course
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.9370-l

PLEASE DO NOT SEND MONEY !
It is with regret that I perform this task. Dr. Gelson V. Gomes. a
professor of the University of Parana, Brazil, has exceeded this
privileges and announced a eletronic course:

> ____________________________________________________________
>        Mastering INTERNET Tools, Seizing METANET Power -
>                      The InterMeta Course
> ____________________________________________________________

I must apologize for this flagrant breach of network etiquette. Please
be aware that Dr. Gelson had no right to do so, since this is against
the rules of our ANSP network, and also against the Bitnet rules.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND MONEY!
I will not discuss what his motivations were. But his account has been
revoked, and there will be no such course through my network.

Please write by normal mail, to:
-> Gelson V. Gomes
-> 358, R. Alvaro Andrade - ap.1201
-> Curitiba PR BRAZIL 80610-240
to get more information on his objectives. He may want to give the
course by normal mail.  :-)

With regards,
--
Alberto Courrege Gomide | Fundacao de Amparo `a Pesquisa - (11)831-3357
Software Supervisor     | Rua Pio XI, 1500 - CEP 05468-901 - Sao Paulo
<gomide@fapq.fapesp.br> | FAX (11)261-4167 Telex (11)82014 - Brazil
(ACG8) - .BR Domain Technical Contact. |
--
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-to: epmdf@YMIR.BITNET
X-Envelope-to: PMDF-L@IRLEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"DAN@INNOSOFT.COM"
X-VMS-Cc: IPMDF
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Date:         Thu, 1 Oct 92 07:49:15 GMT
From:         Ned Freed <NED@SIGURD.INNOSOFT.COM>
Subject: RE: Multiple addresses in reply_to field. How does PMDF handle
              for VMS mail.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l

Dan covered all of this pretty carefully, but he neglected to mention one
item -- there are several UAs besides VMS MAIL that access VMS MAIL mailboxes,
and some of these do support either reply-to-all or reply-to-all-addresses-on-
the-from-line. Some versions of VMS MAIL actually support the latter option
as well; it is a relatively new "feature" of VMS MAIL to only reply to the
first address.

PMDF is careful to generate a VMS MAIL From: line that maximizes functionality
in all these different environments. The fact that VMS MAIL itself cannot
reply to more than one address is unfortunate, but there's no way to fix this
so things work reliably no matter what we do. (DEC could, of course, fix it,
but I wouldn't hold my breath...)

                                Ned
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-to: epmdf@YMIR.BITNET
X-Organization: University of Hong Kong Computer Center
X-Envelope-to: PMDF-L@IRLEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"ipmdf@ymir.bitnet"
X-VMS-Cc: TLAM
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Date:         Sat, 26 Sep 92 12:29:00 +0800
From:         "T.S. Lam" <TLAM@HKUCC>
Subject:      Illegal host/domain and MX
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l

We are running VMS 5.4-2, Multinet 3.0 and PMDF 4.0.

When sending to an MX'ed site, for instance thp.uni-koeln.de, PMDF bounces
with an "illegal host/domain".  If I send it again, it goes through OK.
NSLOOKUP shows the site is MX'ed.  Could there be a timeout with the MX
lookup?  Any suggestion to fix the problem is much appreciated.

T.S. Lam
University of Hong Kong
tlam@hkucc.hku.hk
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-to: epmdf@YMIR.BITNET
X-Envelope-to: PMDF-L@IRLEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"martinea@ireq.hydro.qc.ca"
X-VMS-Cc: IN%"ipmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU"
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Date:         Thu, 1 Oct 92 01:38:00 GMT
From:         Robin Goldstone <robin_goldstone@MACGATE.CSUCHICO.EDU>
Subject:      RE: Summary: Mail system to use with PathWorks
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l

>To: ipmdf-newsgate@mccall.UUCP
>From: Alain Martineau on Wed, Sep 30, 1992 8:06 AM
>Subject: RE: Summary: Mail system to use with PathWorks

>       I am looking at Microsoft mail for internal use but I also need a gatewa
   y to
>VMSmail. Is there such a thing ?
>thanks.


Well, since you are sending this message the PMDF mailing list, I assume you
are running PMDF on your VAX.  If that is true, then what you really need is an
SMTP gateway for Microsoft Mail.  That will allow you to talk to PMDF on the
VAX as well as any other SMTP mail system on the Internet.  We are using that
here.  In fact I am sending this message from Microsoft Mail via the SMTP
gateway.

You did not say whether you were looking at PC Microsoft Mail or Macintosh
Microsoft Mail.  For PC MS Mail, the SMTP gateway is made by Microsoft.  For
Macintosh MS Mail, you want Mail*Link from StarNine Technologies, Berkeley CA.
You can reach them at (510) 548-0391 or sales@starnine.com.  Note there is also
a product called GatorMail-M from Cayman Systems.  This is really the same
exact product as Mail*Link.  StarNine licenses it to Cayman, who re-sells it.
But my dealings with Cayman have been unsatisfactory, in terms of their
technical support for GatorMail-M.  I highly recommend StarNine.

I have had extensive experience integrating both PC and Mac Microsoft Mail with
our VAX mail environment (VMS Mail + PMDF).  I will be happy to discuss this
setup further with anyone who is interested.

Robin Goldstone, Systems Software Specialist
California State University, Chico
robin@csuchico.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-to: epmdf@YMIR.BITNET
X-Envelope-to: PMDF-L@IRLEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"Dan@TOE.TOWSON.EDU"
X-VMS-Cc: IPMDF
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Date:         Fri, 2 Oct 92 06:18:01 GMT
From:         Ned Freed <NED@SIGURD.INNOSOFT.COM>
Subject:      RE: no headers and stuck in queue
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l

> IN the first case, my INFOREP has been getting mail from the INFOREP discussio
   n
> list which occasionally has no headers connected to it.  Just the normal VMS
> headers.  Anybody know under under what conditions this might occur?

Does your INFOREP use DELIVER? This and the headeromit keyword is the only
way to get this effect out of PMDF. If neither of these is involved I suspect
the mail is coming from something other than PMDF.

> In the second case, I have been seeing mail get stuck in various queues for no

> apparent reason - specifically the L and BIT_GATEWAY channels.  MAIL is
> installed with EXQUOTA so it isn't a quota problem. The log files are well bel
   ow
> the version limit.  Any ideas?

There are all sorts of reasons why a delivery job might abort, leaving a
message that only gets picked up by the periodic job. You'll have to track this
down on a case by case basis; there are simply too many possibilities to
consider otherwise. It is important to know where the messages are coming from
as well as where they are going.

Since messages in the BIT_GATEWAY queue never come from VMS MAIL under normal
circumstances, this is not likely to a problem with VMS MAIL.

                                Ned
From: tkslen@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l
Subject: REPOST (for lack of any answer) performance problem with local channel
Date: 5 Oct 92 20:14:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

A couple of weeks ago I had asked the list about performance problems from
going from pmdf v4.0 to v4.1.  By reading the responses I've:

1) Installed bn_gateway and bn_master/open/shared.

   Maybe has helped a little.

2) I've moved from having two batch queues to using the process symbiont
   with 4 server queues.

   This has helped alot since I used to have hundreds of files waiting to
   be delivered in many different queues.

3) I've made the username PMDF the owner of QUEUE_CACHE.DAT.

   This seems to have helped.

4) I've made POST.COM run every two hours and set the logical
   PMDF_SYNCH_CACHE_PERIOD to 1 so that the queue cache gets rebuilt
   every post.com run.

   This has helped the problem of files being left in the local
   queue that should have been delivered.  That is, these files had no reason
   not to be delivered when they were originally placed in the queue.  All
   I would do is run @[EXE]MASTER L by hand and everything would
   get delivered.  But, this problem still exists in a much smaller extent.
   And, it seems when post.com runs it doesn't submit a job for bit_gateway
   even though there are mail messages in the bit_gateway directory.  So I run
   @[EXE]MASTER BIT_GATEWAY by hand and everything gets delivered.

5) I now have the l channel using a batch queue on the fastest cluster machine
   (a 6520).  I did this because the local queue would grow very large, that
   is, 300-500 mail messages.  And local mail delivery would take approx.
   2-3 hours.  But now this is not working anymore.  The semester has gotten
   into full swing and today my local queue grew to 1000-1400 mail messages.
   Keep in mind that the 6520 is not cpu starved.  When I watch the batch
   job try to deliver the mail it get's the cpu when it needs it and it does
   alot of I/O.  In the past, when the queue got a little big I would set
   the job limit to 2 or 3.  But, that does not seem to help anymore.

  A) Does anyone have any suggestions on what I could do to improve my local
     queue's performance?
  B) Why do I still see some files get left behind (as I explained in #4)?
  C) Why doesn't a BIT_GATEWAY job get started by POST.COM when there are
     messages waiting to be delivered?

Thanks,
  Lenny Miceli
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-path: uucp@mccall.UUCP
Errors-to: epmdf@YMIR.BITNET
Organization: Hydro Quebec
X-Envelope-to: PMDF-L@IRLEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"ipmdf-newsgate@mccall.UUCP"
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Date:         Wed, 30 Sep 92 18:36:08 GMT
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was news@IREQ.HYDRO.QC.CA
From:         Alain Martineau <martinea@IREQ.HYDRO.QC.CA>
Subject:      RE: Summary: Mail system to use with PathWorks
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l

In article <1992Sep25.212550.1@myrddn.mits.com.au>, alistair@myrddn.mits.com.au
 writes:
>
> In article <1992Sep9.214100.3556@mits.com.au>,
> alistair@mits.com.au (me) writes:
> > We are currently in the process of connecting all our PC's to the
> > network using PathWorks, and I am trying to determine the most
> > appropriate mail system to put in place.  It must be able to integrate
> > with VMS Mail.
> >
> > The possibilities seem to be:
> >
> > 1.  The unsupported mail client.  This is a DOS application and
> >     most of our users use Windows, so this is a bit clunky.
> >
> > 2.  Microsoft Mail as licensed with MS Office.  Has anyone
> >     integrated this with PMDF?
> >
> > 3.  DEC's Mailworks.
>
> Two mail systems were reported in responses:
>
>       DEC MAILworks
>       WordPerfect Mail
>
> The person who is using WordPerfect Mail is quite happy with it.  We
> are moving to MS Office, so aren't interested.
>
> Most of the responses were for MailWorks, and most people seem to be
> quite happy with it.  One person criticised the interface (buttons not
> working, menu items not being updated), and the mail editor.
>
> There were no responses in relation to MS Mail, so I'll be
> investigating that further myself.
.

        I am looking at Microsoft mail for internal use but I also need a gatewa
   y to
VMSmail. Is there such a thing ?
thanks.

Alain Martineau
martineau@macmartineau.ccr.hydro.qc.ca
Hydro Quebec
11th floor East Tower Complexe Desjardins
PO Box 10000, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H5B 1H7
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-to: epmdf@YMIR.BITNET
Organization: Cambridge Computer Associates, Inc.
X-Envelope-to: PMDF-L@IRLEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"info-pmdf@innosoft.com"
X-VMS-Cc: TINKELMAN
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Date:         Mon, 5 Oct 92 01:11:29 GMT
From:         Bob Tinkelman <bob@CAMB.COM>
Subject:      Disappearing FAX message pages
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l

I'm not sure what I did to make this happen, but I've broken our
ps_to_g3 channel in a strange way.  No error messages are generated,
but FAXes go out with a cover page only, and with no attached pages.
[The cover page correctly advertises ``1 page, including this one'',
but I don't know why there are not attached message pages.]

I just sent a one line message to our text.fax domain address.  It
produced a PostScript msg which was then processed by the ps_to_g3
channel, whose log file contained:

> Initializing PostScript interpreter for message body processing.
> PostScript interpreter initialized.
> Initializing the G3 file.
> G3 file initialized.
> Processing message body.
> Invoking the PostScript interpreter to process the message body.
> Message body processing completed.
> Reinitializing the PostScript interpreter for cover page processing.
> PostScript interpreter reinitialized.
> Processing cover pages.
> Loading cover page file
> Cover page processing completed.
> Updating header record in G3 file: message pages = 0, cover pages = 1.
                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Header record in G3 file updated.

If I take a one line text file, use PMDF PS to produce a PostScript file,
and then mail it to the ps-fax domain, I get 1 cover page and 1 message page.

But things aren't totally consistent.  I can reliably send the gopher.ps
file (and receive it) with no problems.   However, one of our users has a
PostScript file from W4W that looks like it should yield 3 pages, but he
gets cover-sheet-only.

What should I look at to try to track this down further?

Thanks - Bob Tinkelman <bob@camb.com>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-to: epmdf@YMIR.BITNET
Organization: NYU Medical Center, 550 First Ave., New York, 10016
X-Envelope-to: PMDF-L@IRLEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: in%"ipmdf@ymir.bitnet"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Date:         Sat, 3 Oct 92 16:08:46 GMT
From:         SMITH@NYUMED
Subject:      MAILSERV and PACKAGE files...
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l


The new version of VMS_SHARE (V8.1) produces the usual list of files that
a distribution gets packaged into.  In addition it produces a file like
<dist>.$PACKAGE, whgich contains the list of files in the package.  Other
Mail/List servers allow you to send a mail message like SEND dist.PACKAGE
and this allows you to get all the bits, without knowing how many there are.

Is there a chance that MAILSERV could get enhanced to provide this service?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-to: epmdf@YMIR.BITNET
X-Envelope-to: PMDF-L@IRLEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"info-pmdf@ymir.claremont.edu"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Date:         Fri, 2 Oct 92 01:05:46 GMT
From:         BAJGOT@ADLER.MEC.MASS.EDU
Subject:      listserv error in send/list
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l

User get the following message when using the listserv on my node:

Subject: Errors in MAILSERV command processing

You are not authorized to obtain the contents of list MCET-PHYSICS
Use the HELP command to get a list of legal MAILSERV commands.
-

message went to:

mcet-physics-request@adler.mec.mass.edu

with the text body:

send/list mcet-physics

I changed the protection to w:re on the mcet-physics.dis file but that
didn't work.

Any suggestions.

Jeff
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-to: epmdf@YMIR.BITNET
X-Envelope-to: PMDF-L@IRLEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"PETER@EMBL-Hamburg.DE"
X-VMS-Cc: IPMDF
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Date:         Mon, 5 Oct 92 19:21:20 GMT
From:         "Daniel C. Newman" <DAN@INNOSOFT.COM>
Subject:      RE: switching master_debug on and off
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l

> 1. Is it not possible to have ! on a channel line act as a delimiter?
>    I thought it would save me from my own one-hand typing if I left the
>    tag on the end of the line and commented it off..

While it is possible, it is not desireable.  This would create a dangerous
distinction between the nature of comments which can appear on the first line
of a channel block and everywhere else.  I say "dangerous" because people may
forget the distinction and do the wrong thing.  (I know of two or three cases
where sites messed up their configuration for days because they thought they
could put comments at the end of rewrite rules.)  I say "distinction" because
the only place where it might make sense to allow a comment not at the start of
a line is on the first line of a channel block.  You cannot do this in a
rewrite rule because the rewrite rule itself might require the use of a !.  The
same holds for a host name associated with a channel.

> 2. Is there a way of switching master_debug on and off for an SMTP Channel
>    (MTCP_Local) without CNBUILD and INSTALL twice - especially on a cluster
>    where only one node is handling the channel anyway and where I want it
>    just long enough to monitor one message?

I believe that something like this is intended for 4.2.  However, note that the
debugging cannot necessarily be turned on and off with per message granularity.
Channel programs load their options once, when they start running.  So, only
when they start running would they detect a logical, for instance, telling them
to produce debugging output.  The channel would then continue to produce this
debugging output until it exited.  This means that channels which run as
detached processes (e.g., BN_SLAVE and FAX_TO_DATA) would still have to be
restarted to see the change.

Dan
From: TERRY@SPCVXA.SPC.EDU (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.pmdf-l
Subject: RE: REPOST (for lack of any answer) Problems with % addressing.
Date: 6 Oct 92 09:01:00 GMT
Organization: St. Peter's College, US
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-to: epmdf@YMIR.BITNET
X-Envelope-to: PMDF-L@IRLEARN.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"tkslen@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu"
X-VMS-Cc: IPMDF@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU,TERRY
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

tkslen@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Lenny Miceli) writes:

[I believe this is the first time I've seen this message, so if you sent it
previously it must have been lost]

> Every so often I find a mail message in my local queue addressed to:
>
> user%node  where "node" is greater than seven characters
> (e.g. joe%abcdefgh)
>    or
> user%node.decnet  where "node" is less than seven characters
> (e.g. joe%abc.decnet)
>
> I know addressing like this is frowned upon, but since pmdf will still accept
> it I feel this problem should be resolved.  Reading the manual tells me that
> if pmdf can't rewrite the address then it will treat the address as
> user%node@localhost.  The only problem with this is, if "node" is not a valid
> decnet nodename then vms can give strange error messages.  For example,

  We've found that things work better if we list all of our DECnet nodes in
the PMDF configuration file and simply reject anything else. For even greater
reliability, you can run PMDF on the remote nodes and use DECnet SMTP instead
of MAIL-11 over DECnet. That way PMDF can determine the exact problem, rather
than relying on what VMS MAIL tells it, which is always changing (and often
incorrect).

  If these messages are for nodes that don't exist, you can either rewrite
them to the proper node (if you can determine a pattern to the errors) or
let PMDF bounce them after the notices period expires. You could also re-
write them to a "bad" channel with notices 1, and define PMDF_LOCAL_ADDRESS_
FORMAT to return some explanatory text to the sender with the message.

        Terry Kennedy           Operations Manager, Academic Computing
        terry@spcvxa.bitnet     St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA
        terry@spcvxa.spc.edu    +1 201 915 9381
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU