HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: alex@unx.sas.com (Alexandra Bost)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Tad and his "Mother"
Date: 18 Dec 1992 14:28:53 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


dweinste@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (David Weinstein) writes:

>I think that the real "Ted Orsini" (who naturally bore an incredible
>resemblance to MEK) did disappear years ago. When Tad/Ted reappeared
>(by the sort of staggering coincidence that only appears in Soaps and
>Made-For-Television Movies), his "mother" naturally assumed that he
>was in fact her son.

Sort of like the Aldens not knowing the real Clay on _Loving_,
right?  (See?! I *AM* starting to understand that Soap!)  :-)

>Otherwise, why would she be *so* eager for him to regain his memory?
>Why would she press him to go to Pine Valley? I'd say that she really
>does believe that he is her son.

It's a stretch, but you are probably right.  The way Nora was going on 
and on about "miracles" and her "son" on Wednesday's show, she must 
really believe that Tad is Ted... 

It's going to be very confusing when Ruth and Opal try to convince Ted 
he is Tad...and Nora will be trying to convince Tad he is Ted...and 
Dimitri won't know WHAT to call him!  :-)


Alex
"Ted or Tad...who cares?!  He is BACK!!!!"  sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
--
Alexandra Bost                |      _   _    ___  _ _
UNIX System Administrator     |     / \ | |  | _ |\ | /
SAS Institute,    Cary NC     |    / ^ \| |_ | _|  > <
E-mail:  alex@unx.sas.com     |    |_|_||___||___|/_|_\
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria)
Subject: Re: AMC: New Pictures - Updated list
Organization: MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 15:16:38 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.174648.10140@u.washington.edu> lcheap@cac.washington.edu (Laurel Cheap ) writes:
>  An Li Chen slides onto Palmer
> *Tad Martin slides in between (this means he's here to stay!)
  ^^^^^^^^^^^
I'll say one thing: That is the *fastest* I have ever seen them get
in somebody's picture!

Thanks, Laurel!

CAZ 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jgacker@news.gsfc.nasa.gov (James G. Acker)
Subject: Re: B & B
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:19:14 GMT

Amy Lindsay (amy@lloyd.Camex.COM) wrote:
: In article <1992Dec14.211639.15406@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> jgacker@news.gsfc.nasa.gov (James G. Acker) writes:
: >diane@greenland.island.COM wrote:
: >	ME!  ME!  ME!  Absolutely... because Sheila has been
: >trying to re-invent herself, and she'll agonize a bit before going
: >through with it.  Maybe I can fix that VCR myself...
: 
: Poor Jim!  Maybe we should all get together and send the VCR a "get well
: soon" card.

	Just to clarify -- my VCR is fine and currently showing videos
of Barney the Purple Dinosaur to a precocious two-year-old, with occasional
smatterings of Elmo and Big Bird.  I'm supposed to have it back by the
end of the week, but then my parents visit and may actually be watching
TV while they should be taping B&B and I'm at work.  So updates are AWOL
until further notice.  Sorrendo.



: >	This'd be really cool.  Then who IS Ridge's dad?  (Mountain
: >Range is not an acceptable answer).
: 
: Maybe Esker?  (I loved that one!  If I ever have a kid I would consider it
: for some fraction of a second...)

	Another one (not exactly a glacial ridge, but a glacial
formation) is Kame.  I forget exactly what it is (a conical hill, due
to a meltwater stream depositing sediments at the base of a glacial
waterfall, perhaps -- gotta go check).
	Esker will NOT work with my last name.  Esker Acker. NOT!


: 
: Actually, what we don't know is that MOLLY CARTER switched the babies at
: birth.  The Real Ridge Forrester is actually Blade (from Y&R).  Look he's
: blonde, Thorne's blonde, Steph's blonde...

	Furthermore, he's Taylor's hubby in real-life.  He said on
an interview that he goes across the hall to practice love scenes with
Hunter.
	Can you see this:
	(Gofer knocking on the door)
	"Mr. Tylo!  Mr. Tylo!  You're wanted on the soundstage RIGHT
AWAY!"
	(Muffled murmurs of pleasure behing the dressing-room door)
	"We're not (ahhh) done rehears (ohhh yeah) -ing the scene yet!"


: 
: 					--amy
: 					(who's not blonde, and therefore,
: 					 not a Forrester...)
: 

: Typography & Design Department ~ Camex, Inc. ~ Boston, MA (617-426-7550 x575)
: 	 There are two Rules of Life from which all others derive:
: 		 1.  Don't be stupid.  2. Don't be a jerk.

	Thorne breaks both on a daily basis.

	Jim Acker
	jgacker@neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kmadden@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Karen T Madden)
Subject: Y&R: Icky in her bathrobe!
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 18:03:45 GMT

My, My Icky, you look pretty bad in the morning. I guess Miguel isn't there to 
help you with your make-up ;)

It sure is nice to see someone on a soap look worse than I do in the morning. 
Too bad it wasn't Nikki!

-Karen
-- 
"The Ohio State University: where they say you
 aren't just a number, and then assign you one."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: rek1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Robert Kennedy)
Subject: SB:TAN:BYE
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:36:42 GMT

Well, gang, this is it.  I'm done with my M.S., and this is my last day 
at work, and probably my last reading of r.a.t.s here at the U of A.
I'm not going to be here at work very long today, so I thought I'd cay
bye now.  For anyone that wants it, my snail mail
address over the holidays is 
Suzanna Kennedy
Rte. 2 Box 112
Newton, MS  39345-9628.  I'll be at my dad's for a couple of weeksn,
then on to Georgia.  I'm hoping to get net access, but I don't know yet.

Happy Holidays to you all!
It's been fun! 

suzanna
From: steveh@grafex.Cupertino.CA.US (Steve Harding KA6ETB)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: Trivia #9
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 92 09:22:12 -0800
Organization: The GRAFex Company

In <78163@hydra.gatech.EDU> gt8232d@prism.gatech.EDU (Jarvis T. Lowndes) writes:
>In article <mcmahon.199@nd.edu> mcmahon@nd.edu (Sheila M. McMahon) writes:
>>Here we go again folks...
><
><1) Who was Margo's partner on the police force before Hal Munson?

Aw, gee.  I can see his face, but I can't put a name on it.  It were
a black guy.  He had the hots for Jess for awhile.

><3) Who was the attorney who prosecuted Paul Ryan for the murder of James
><   Stenbeck?

>Oh, who was this?  Seemed like he was prosecuting everybody at that time....

Jason Benedict?  I remember he prosecuted Barbara.  She was pissed at him
for a long time for that.

><5) How many children does Nancy McCloskey have? Name them.

>Four.  Penny, Don, Bob, and a tot named Susan who disappeared from
>her crib one day and was never heard from again....

Oh no!  Not another lost child story!

>>8) Why did Tonio Reyes marry Meg Snyder?

She blackmailed him.

>>10) What was the alias used by James Stenbeck during the Falcon storyline?

Lester Keyes.

-- 
-- 
play:steveh@grafex.Cupertino.CA.US 408.252.0578     work:harding@nas.nasa.gov
              A prince trapped in the body of a dirty old man.
From: rose@cecily.UUCP (Rose M. Delckum)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: 12/16 Major Gripe 
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 07:32:24 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The New Alaska Riviera
X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00 beta rel2

In article <1992Dec17.143457.19385@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>, barter,elizabeth writes:

> What the HELL was Jennifer doing going to
> Larry's house?  I know we are supposed to believe
> that Jenn would run to comfort her bestfriendinthewholeworld
> but this was just too much for me to handle.  No matter 
> how good a friend someone was, I would not be going to 
> the house of my rapist to find her and help her sort out 
> her problems.  In fact, I would seriously rethink our friendship 
> if she would have anything at all to do with such a man, knowing 
> that he raped me.  I guess that line Carly had about knowing 
> how difficult it was for Jenn to come was supposed to make us feel
> better.  To Missy's credit, she looked uncomfortable and uneasy.  
> And I liked the fact that she questioned Carly's motives (although 
> she backed off later).

     I'm with Beth here.  No matter how good a person Jennifer is
supposed to be, this was going too far.  A phone call, maybe.
But going to Lawrence's house, no way.  *Maybe* I could accept it
if we saw scenes beforehand where she was asking Jack if he
thought she should go, discussing her fears about it.  And when
she was there, if she had acted totally on edge and jumpy,
nervous and scared, then it might've been more realistic.  And
the fact that he's Nicky's father notwithstanding, why didn't
Carly just mount a search on her own?  Why work with him?
> 
> Does anyone know if this is a rewrite of the scene Matt talked 
> about at his PA, the one Missy refused to do? Wasn't Larry supposed 
> to come to Jenn's looking for Carly? I could have accepted that 
> more easily than Jenn going to his house.  He could have played it
> real slick and smooth, like nothing had ever happened, but implying
> that whatever did was Jenn's imagination.  At least that would have
> been truer to Larry's character than this lovesick puppy crap.

     I am so sick of LAwrence as cocker spaniel.  His character
has lost all his depth, his slickness, and is just plain boring
and bordering on nauseating.  
> 
> Thank you for letting me get that off my chest.
> 
> Beth

     Roserooni
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can blow out a candle        |      Rose Delckum
 But you can't blow out a fire,   |      rose@cecily.UUCP
 Once the flames begin to catch   |      rose%cecily@uunet.uu.net    
 The wind will blow them higher"  |      uunet!coplex!cecily!rose
             --Peter Gabriel      |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kriesel@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Julie R Kriesel)
Subject: Re: ATWT
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 19:02:35 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.211150.11520@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> jgacker@news.gsfc.nasa.gov (James G. Acker) writes:
>Julie R Kriesel (kriesel@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu) wrote:
>
>: Well, I've got to go now.  J'ai un examen final de francais.  J'ai peur
>: parce que je n'ai pas etudie bien...C'est la vie, n'est-ce pas?
>: 
>: Special K
>
>	Morticia!  That's French!  You know how I get when you
>speak French!  Kiss kiss kiss kiss kiss kiss kiss kiss kiss...
>
>(Gomez Addams from "The Addams Family")
>
>	Lazzzzzzzerjet Jimmy
>	jgacker@neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov

Well, if you would just join me in the Linen Closet, I'll speak french
to you all night long...(wink, wink, nudge, nudge.)  ;-)


Special K

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: tc26@quads.uchicago.edu (Tim Clark)
Subject: Re: Another unlurking
Reply-To: tc26@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:45:00 GMT

In article <17DEC199210501265@vax.sonoma.edu> connorm@vax.sonoma.edu (Michelle Connor) writes:
>HI! I just wanted to say that I have been reading R.A.T.S. for about 3 months,
>and I finally got the nerve up to actually post!  I have been watching AMC
>forever: My grandmother, and my mother watch it, so I grew up watching it!

Welcome to the world of RATS Posting

>My beef:  I CAN'T stand the *new* charlie. He is SOOOO repugnant. He is WAY too
>old for Haley, and I almost lost my lunch when he actually told Haley
>"hold on to me, just hold on to me!"  UGH!  He probably smells bad...
>
>And, I think the less we see of NewNAt, the better!
                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
YES, YES, YES, YES, YES, YES,

Get rid of NOT-Nat, Get rid of NOT-Nat, Get rid of NOT-Nat !!!!!!!!!

(Wimp Voice On)  
"But Don't you feel sorry for her, being frail and helpless"
(WV OFF) 

"I don't THINK SO,
Tim

                           NUKE THE DAMN BUNNY ALREADY!!!!
   |  _
   \ /
    UU __         Dump Not-Nat, Dump Not-Nat, Dump Not-Nat, NUKE HER !!!
    ==/  \ 
   /\__o |
  *|__\__/
   /_ \_          "boomp boomp boomp boomp boomp..." "BOOM!!!!!!!"

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________________
  ______   _____  |Tim Clark                     |Erika Kane Loves Tim Clark
    /     /       |University of Chicago Library |
   /  .  /____    |tc26@midway.uchicago.edu      |"I don't THINK SO, Tim" e.k
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: M21760@mwvm.mitre.org
Subject: Re: Y&R - Jack
Organization: The MITRE Corporation, McLean VA 22102
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 16:03:11 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.164750.1365@dmntor.UUCP>
toni@dmntor.UUCP (Toni Spurgeon) writes:
 
>
>
>Sorry Sucheta.... as the regulars well know... I despise
>Peter Bergman's Jack! You must be more of a romantic than me...
>as your description of his Jack sounded accurate and palpable...
>but when I watch, I LONG for Terry Lester's Jack. (with the ONE exception
>of Jack's recent snarky comments about Jill. He actually had
>me laughing... first time EVER! Normally I fervently wish
>for Terry Lester's charm and his sarcastic bent on everything.
>Jack's edges were rough... but you maay not have been watching
>when he did (briefly) turn around while working at a homeleess
>shelter... he even fell in love and did noble things.... WITHOUT
>eing the saccharin putz that I so often think of Bergman's Jack!
>This, of course, is all my opinion! You are entitled to yours...
>but this Jack is a new character to me... NOT JACK!! For that
>matter, so is Ashley.... but that's another paragraph!
>Keep on posting!
>Toni
 
Me, too!  I miss Jack sooooooo much!  He was much more handsome
and charming and interesting!  This new Jack is always getting
all choked up when he talks to Nikki - everything comes out
in a whisper.  I expect him to start bawling right then and there.
Sensitivity I can handle, but he goes way too far.
From: alex@unx.sas.com (Alexandra Bost)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: LOV: Who's getting killed?
Date: 11 Dec 1992 12:47:22 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

djg@phoenix.genrad.com (Deborah J. Graham) writes:

>According to Soap Opera Digest, someone will be killed on Friday,
>December 18. So, who do you vote for?


My vote has got to be Ceara. 

 - She's not a regular character.
 - Genie Francis will NOT be working on Loving
 - Jeremy needs a LIFE again...which means finding a new love.
   (I mean, this IS "Loving"! :-))

Alex

P.S.  My first _Loving_ post! Wow -- I must be a convert...  :-)
--
Alexandra Bost                |      _   _    ___  _ _
UNIX System Administrator     |     / \ | |  | _ |\ | /
SAS Institute,    Cary NC     |    / ^ \| |_ | _|  > <
E-mail:  alex@unx.sas.com     |    |_|_||___||___|/_|_\
From: VECTRGSJ@VAX.CSUN.EDU (Gail Said Johnson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: That damned wedding
Date: 16 Dec 1992 11:38:57 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Tim speaks again:

>>Anyways, my gripe (surprise surprise):  Why didn't Marcus
>>walk Carly down the isle?  Isn't he supposed to be one of
>>her best friends?  
>
>Like some others have said, I liked the idea of Carly giving herself
>away.   It seemed to make sense considering that there really isn't
>a father figure in her life.  And besides, it goes along with what is

I thought it made sense for her to be giving herself in marriage, too.  There 
really was no person appropriate to make the symbolic gesture with Frankie 
still off in Africa.

>supposed to be a modern-thinking character.  Not that there is anything
>at all wrong with the idea of being "given away", but shirking tradition
>is okay too. 

Ooooh, I find it interesting that you think there's nothing wrong with the 
idea of the woman being "given" to the man she's marrying.  It's a symbolic 
gesture today (I hope), but it did used to signify that the man who used to be 
responsible for the woman was giving her to the man who was now going to be 
responsible for her.  I'd say it went right along with being Mrs. "husband's 
full name"!  :)

		      	     __.        |
		      	    /  |  __. . |
			   (__/|/(_/|_|_|__)
			      /| gsaidjohnson@vax.csun.edu
			     (_/ Computer Center / Cal-State Northridge*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     *This post, of course, has nothing whatever to do with the university.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: mas@calmasd.Prime.COM (Marisa SorBello)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Who will find Tad?
Date: 11 Dec 92 18:32:51 GMT
Organization: Computervision, San Diego, CA

In article <1992Dec10.192342.10467@leland.Stanford.EDU> thompson@waldron.Stanford.EDU (Sharon Thompson-Schill) writes:

>No - Craig lied about all that.  He heard the PI questioning about
>Tad's whereabouts, and came back to say he knew him. But they never
>actualyl met, did they?

Yes, they had met casually once or twice, but never had the great
friendship that Craig claimed they'd had. 

-- Marisa

P.S.:  The first thing that occurred to me when we saw Tad's
back with the woman in New York was "Great, just what Tad needs 
-- another mother!"

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: sher@umbc4.umbc.edu (Sherri Crain)
Subject: Re: GL: Wardrobe
Organization: Univ. of MD, Baltimore County
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 15:31:17 GMT

In article <1992Dec9.171033.4252@news.cs.indiana.edu> Liz%Eng%Banyan@magnolia.banyan.com writes:

>You know, there is a fine line between tastefull and tasteless, and I think 
>Eve's hemline passed it about five inches ago.
>
>Are they trying to turn her into a sleaze queen, or what???

  I didn't think her dresses were so much sleazy as they just don't fit
her character..AT ALL!  Now,Mindy could get away with wearing something
so mini,but not Eve.  She didn't look attractive at all,in my opinion.
If they're going to try to make Eve more attractive for the sake of
Nick,they should work on her hair first,then move into some clothes
that accent her figure,rather than destroy it.

-- 

     Lack of planning on your part                 -sher   
doesn't justify an emergency on my part     sher@umbc3.umbc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jclesar@unix.amherst.edu (Jen)
Subject: Re: SIS:Teddy&AIDS (spoiler)
Organization: Amherst College
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:55:22 GMT

Coni Gehler (clg@cray.com) wrote:
> In article <12DEC199222244239@ducvax.auburn.edu> cpearson@ducvax.auburn.edu (MISTYEYES) writes:
> >In article <Bz4w7F.7p4@andy.bgsu.edu>, ckile@andy.bgsu.edu (crystal kile) writes...
> >
> >
> >I just watched this episode and I think it was very
> >well done.. 
> >
> >Colleen
> >
> 
> Would someone *PLEASE* post or email me a summary of the December 12th episode?

> Please please please please please?
> 
> Coni

Me too, PLEASE!!!!   
Jen  ---- e-mail: jclesar@amherst.edu
From: lhess@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Leah Surber)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Harley and Mallet again
Date: 17 Dec 92 13:01:19 GMT
Organization: NCR E&M CLEMSON Liberty, SC

<Mf=nfkq00WBOM1CnMK@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: lhess@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Leah Surber)
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: NCR E&M CLEMSON Liberty, SC
Keywords: 

In article <Mf=nfkq00WBOM1CnMK@andrew.cmu.edu> kb4c+@andrew.cmu.edu (Karin
Brennan) writes:
>*************
>Liz said,
>
>... according to next week's TV Guide...
> 
>
> 
>...in mid-January we'll be treated to Harley and Mallet at the Vietnam 
>Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C.  So if they're not back together
>by then, at least they'll be talking!
>*************''
>
>When I first read this it seemed  like a normal thing to do, but after
>thinking about it I realized that AC isn't a veteran.  He isn't even in
>the Service.   He does, however, behave much like our sterotypical idea
>of the 'Angry Vietnam Veteran'. 
>

However, Harley's father supposedly died in that war, and since he is
scheduled to show up in early February, I think it is probably leading
up to this storyline.



L.

-- 
Organization: Indirect Cost, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 12:36:29 -0500 
From: Annemarie Bosnyak <ab3t+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: GL:What's gonna happen to Mo?

CC:

felicia@duke.edu (Felicia Lennon) writes:

 >  I think that Mo will 1). find out about Ed and Lillian and
 >                       2). find out about Bridgette's pregnancy 
 >  and will become so depressed that she commits sucide.  Has a
 >  sucide story ever been done on GL?  If so who and when?  

Didn't Reva, upon witnessing Kyle and Maeve's nuptials try to kill
herself by jumping off a bridge only to be rescued by ........... fill
in the blank - he was some nut case who later tried to kill her.  And
when Reva drove her car off the cliff... was she sane then and trying to
commit suicide or had she just gone nuts and didn't know what she was
doing?

And didn't Roxie try to commit suicide also?  The whole Shane family is
just crazy I guess.....

-anne marie


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: Joanna L. Castillo <pefv702@utpe.pe.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: DOOL:  That damned wedding
X-Xxdate: Tue, 15 Dec 92 20:13:22 GMT
Organization: UT Petroleum Engineering Dept.
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d15
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 19:13:16 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.170513.5318@cbfsb.cb.att.com> kelly.smith, kjs@cbnewsg.cb.att.com
writes:
>	I can agree to an extent.  She claimed early on that Marcus
>	was on of her first and best friends.  So what happened?  Was
>	he the only one who actually dislikes her?  (read smiley faces)
>	;-) ;-)  Of course ole Dorkday couldn't possibly have anyone
>	dislike Carly.  What I mean is, Jenn was her best friend and
>	I would think Marcus qualified as a best friend too.  Hence he
>	could have walked her down the isle.  And since when are divorcees
>	allowed to get remarried in church?  I know my dad and stepmom
>	tried, but couldn't.  Have things changed? They were married by
>	a minister (my dad and Paula) but not in a church.  Or did
>	she have Vic's marriage anulled?  Is there a special clause
>	in the book of religion rules about anullments?

Well, actually...yes.  And, I'm pretty sure the marriage between Vic
and Carly was annulled.  Having a wedding annulled officially means
that it never happened -- they were never married.  So, she can get
married in the Catholic church without any problems.  Of course, that
is an issue that would have been nice to see mentioned.  Oh, well...

>				Boysies.......

Joanna.

--
| \____ ----- ____/           |  "Let's just be friends -- friends    |
|      ( o o )                |  who never talk or see each other."   |
|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    |      - David Letterman, 7-22-92       |
|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! |           pefv702@utpe.pe.utexas.edu  |
Organization: City University of New York/ University Computer Center
Date: Monday, 14 Dec 1992 13:16:54 EST
From: Nelson Broat <NMBCU@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: TAN: Happy Birthday!
 <1992Dec14.165049.26153@chpc.utexas.edu>

In article <1992Dec14.165049.26153@chpc.utexas.edu>, Joanna L. Castillo
<pefv702@utpe.pe.utexas.edu> says:
>
>In article <wf=9OXq00iUzE1Bagq@andrew.cmu.edu> Liz Fox, lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu
>writes:
>>Have a great 29th (!) Birthday!!
>>Love,
>>
>>The Big B
>
>Yowsa!  One more year and you'll be OLD!  It's so fun to rile up all
>them old folks.  Heh heh.
>
>and The Loquacious L.

I can hardly wait till next year when JoJo da Lemonhead joins the ranks of
the aged. Heh heh.

Happy Birthday Tater

And a Happy Birthday to Kathy "Canty" two days early.

Nelson - Whose currently 30 something :) and coming to you from old age
         home.

Lemon your room has been prepared. :-)

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps