HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance)
Subject: Re: evil twins
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 23:19:07 GMT

richard@Apple.COM (a flying squirrel) writes:

>If we are to speak of fire hazards, you pale in comparison to FJ!!.

*snif* Well. Can I be a flood hazard instead?

--
John Dorrance * Alleged Homosexual/Shameless Hussy * thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu

			Dark. Handsome. 6 feet tall.
		  31 flavors? I believe he's got 'em all!
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: ry@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (ryerson.schwark)
Subject: Re: Support?
Organization: UNIX System Laboratories, Summit, NJ
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 17:23:25 GMT
Keywords: apology

In article <1992Oct2.143215.10166@panix.com> mara@panix.com (Mara Chibnik) writes:
>
> >One doesn't have to be *martyred* to be a saint, does one?
>Well, anyone who wants to go that route has a choice of martyerers
>here, I'd say.  Grandma K, do you do this sort of work too?

No, I couldn't stand the competition.

Seriously though, Mara raises an excellent point about support and 
"niceness" here.  there's a lot more than what meets the eye, both
positive and negative, and for the new comers its sometimes hard to
understand, particularly without the history.

Ry 
ry@usl.com
Xref: sparky soc.motss:41782 soc.bi:13382
From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: soc.motss,soc.bi
Subject: Re: gay science fiction (and a moment of shamelessness...)
Date: 5 Oct 92 02:32:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: spdcc.1992Oct5.023256.13200
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA

In article <1ao5fgINNj28@agate.berkeley.edu> rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport) writes:
>Not to mention bestiality and great storylines, BTW ...

Well, anthropoid bestiality anyway...

>Elf's journal was the first time I was actually aroused when reading about
>two men making love.  Rather cool.

Really?  It made me swear off screwing anyone with a tail, furry ears
and a first name with an apostrophe in it.

-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: astrology and YOU
Date: 5 Oct 92 21:43:09 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <Bvnz5C.A0H@unix.amherst.edu>
twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

>In article <mike02770920904132348@batpad.lgb.ca.us>
mike@batpad.lgb.ca.us (mike batchelor) writes:

>>(Of course, anybody born between August 1957 and November 1970 will
>>have any conjuction with Uranus occurring in Scorpio, because this
>>is how long it takes Uranus to cross that sign.)

>Hah!  I'm on the cusp!  (November 12, 1970.)  I guess this explains
>something about being bi ...
>____ Tim Pierce

...or being very young  (oh, duh-ROOL, duh-ROOL!)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: rogerk@QueerNet.ORG (Roger B.A. Klorese)
Subject: Re: ***APOLOGY*** (kindly read me)
Organization: QueerNet
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 04:16:02 GMT

In article <mcmelmon-240992095912@mcmelmon.apple.com>, mcmelmon@aruba.apple.com
(Matthew Melmon) writes:
|> Matthew Melmon
|> Apple Computer, Inc.
|> If my opinions were Apple's, I'd be driving a shiny car 

If your opinions were Apple's, I'd be using a PC...
-- 
ROGER B.A. KLORESE                                              +1 415 ALL-ARFF
rogerk@unpc.QueerNet.ORG                 {ames,decwrl,pyramid}!mips!unpc!rogerk
"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from."
                                                                   -- J. Foster
From: Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Madonna bashing
Date: Sun,  4 Oct 92 12:47:58 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <67092@cup.portal.com> <1992Oct3.232642.28944@nevada.edu>

Shawn Hicks writes:
>>Unfortunately, it seems that the Officialdom in SF is on a
>>kick to stamp out foolin' around in fag bars.
>
>Oh, I don't know.  The *one* time I was in the Lone Star I
>saw Furr doing his version of a taste test.   ;>

Hmmm... Was this during Gay Pride?  If it was, that hunky
little blonde uncut Canadian Bear was certainly tasty. ;-{)##]
 
() And that's the world in a nutshell -- an appropriate
() receptacle.
()      -- Stan Dunn
-----
[> George D. Madison | NBCS: B8f+t+w-e+s+k+a!cv | Just say NO to razors! <]
[> It's a BEAR thing -- you wouldn't understand. <|> furr@cup.portal.com <]
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Michael S. Adler)
Subject: Re: CABAL stuff
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst MA
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 17:50:13 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.230141.14935@osf.org> coren@osf.org (Robert Coren) writes:

>I'm an omnivore myself, and/but I get pretty pissed off when people
>try to pick "logical" holes in the belief systems of vegetarians.
>Anybody is free to eat or not eat whatever they choose, and they don't
>have to justify it to me. This is especially true of someone who
>chooses *not* to eat certain things: what harm can that possibly do to
>anybody else? And why do their choices in this matter have to be
>backed up by what you consider ironclad logic?

Because inconsistency bothers me.  If they base their dietary choices
on ethical grounds (not eating meat to prevent cruelty to animals),
but do not apply those same rules to other foods (cheese, milk, eggs),
then it pisses me off.  A big reason for why it pisses me off, though,
is that almost everyone I have met in the animal-rights variety of
vegetarianism exudes a certain haughtiness that simply *begs* logical
analysis.

I don't apply my arguments to people who don't eat meat for other
reasons.  A former roommate of mine does not eat red meat, but eats
poultry and fish, and consumes milk and cheese voraciously.  He simply
hates the taste of red meat.  That's not a choice that I think
requires justification of any sort.

George said, somewhere else in this thread, that his reason for
avoiding meat is primarily that he despises the taste.  That wasn't
the initial impression I had of him.  George: I apologize for
unreasonably tarring you with this particular brush.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "You are just naive and repressed because
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /  penis envy is here and it's now and it's
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  all around you." -- Neal C. Wickham
From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Damon Wayons -- what's the deal?
Date: 29 Sep 92 00:56:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: spdcc.1992Sep29.005645.23810
Organization: insert anything here

@ector.cs.purdue.edu> berninge@cs.purdue.EDU (James Berninger) writes:
>My boyfriend/SO/fiance/whatever and I were flipping channels the
>other night (Saturday?) and happened to find something called "HBO
>Comedy Showcase" or something like that, I think.  We only watched
>about 30 seconds or so of it, because the only person we saw was
>Damon Wayons -- one of the guys from "In Living Color: The TV
>series".  The only "joke" we saw went something like this:
>	"I used to beat up gays.  We all did.  It was easy, 'cause
>	they don't fight back." [Followed by somewhat effeminate
>	fleeing]

>I realize that for some time, we have been trying to make heads or
>tails of the "Men on..." skits -- was it light-hearted fun, or
>downright degrading.  I wasn't too thrilled with what we saw that
>night, but the TV was quickly turned off before I could see any more
>(I was hoping to).

>Did anyone else see this?  What's going on?  (For the record, I
>didn't even get to hear what the audience's reaction was.)

	You're surprised?

	The material for "Men On..." could be funny and inoffensive
delivered to a GBLO*-audience by a GBLO*-performer.  It's not.

	The way it's presented though, the joke is on us.  We
are being laughed at, not with.  And some GBLO*-people, mostly
the assimilationalists lap it up under the heading of "good doggie". 
It's a nicely dressed fag joke.

	This isn't too hard to figure out.  Most of the people laughing
at "Men On..." are not running out with their newfound sensitivity
and enlightenment about the myths of stereotyping and persuading
the powers that be to in any way let us be equals in society.  They're
standing around the water cooler laughing among themselves at how
funny "those guys acting like fags looked last night..."  And they
I'm sure *expect* Damon's material to include more non-subtle fag jokes
in a venue that doesn't have TV censors.  And so, predictably, it does.

	I'm sure there are enlightened people out there who do
see understand the "real" humor of "Men on..." certainly most
GBLO*-fans should.  But to assume that most of the viewing public
"gets it" is the ultimate in denial.  IF that were anything close
to reality, we wouldn't be clawing for our rights the way we are:
"getting it" implies some understanding of the GBLO*-community and
some acceptance of it.  Do you see that in everyday life?  I
certainly don't.

	With any luck, GLAAD will pick up on this and run with it.
I fear though that people will opt more to "not upset the strayts"
than to see "Men On..." for what it really is, and not what we'd like
it to be.

BBC
From: Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: CABAL stuff
Date: Thu,  1 Oct 92 19:49:28 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <1992Oct01.032452.27427@microsoft.com> <66969@cup.portal.com>
  <1992Oct1.145050.3276@netcom.com>

Jack Hamilton remarks:
>>(Absolutely *NO* humor intended.)
>
>Don't worry, George, no one expected any.

As well they shouldn't, on this particularly loathesome topic.
 
() I will give up my beard when they shave it from my cold,
() dead face!
()      -- Peter Thomas (From the "Razor's Anonymous" Handbook)
-----
[> George D. Madison | NBCS: B8f+t+w-e+s+k+a!cv | Just say NO to razors! <]
[> It's a BEAR thing -- you wouldn't understand. <|> furr@cup.portal.com <]
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: foucault@netcom.com (Howard Arthur Faye)
Subject: Re: enough already.
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 03:07:20 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.010738.14964@macc.wisc.edu> anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:
>
>In article <f1+p#v=.foucault@netcom.com> foucault@netcom.com
>(Howard Arthur Faye) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Sep29.190250.23521@macc.wisc.edu>
>anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:
>
>>>However, dearest Robert, on the subject of Richard Strauss,
>>>especially his operas Elektra, Salmoe, and Die Frau ohne
>>>Schatten, I think Clay's adoration is more than
>>>well-founded, since I share his taste for them.
>
>>The only truly obstinate characteristic possessed by Clay
>>(and now, seemingly, by Jess as well!) is the failure to
>>recognise the musical and moral superiority of bel canto.
>
>Howard, you curmugeon you, did I say Strauss was my All?
>Good heavens, there's Mozart, the greatest of all.  If by
>bel canto you mean the drear of Bellini and Rossini, I shall
>be content to let you think ill of me, alas.  I would not
>exactly despise Verdi either.  And I think everyone who
>doesn't know opera should start with Butterfly (and a lot of
>patience).
>
Recognising the aesthetic superiority of bel canto and grand
opera that selflessly leaks through the alpine passes towards
the teutons makes me a 'curmudgeon'? I was simply deducing
that you and Clay were tastes akin. I stand corrected! I am
as Tamino discovering that the moral universe was quite the
reverse of what he expected...



-- 
Howard Arthur Faye * Panglossian Acres * Box 7 * Littlerock, CA   93543
                         Fax: 805.944.5958

Don't "follow your bliss." If you "follow your bliss," you will either
collide with someone else's bliss or you will fall into a deep hole.

				-from 'The Anti-Campbell'
From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: If you haven't sent your checks to no-on-hate yet, do it!
Date: 28 Sep 92 21:05:53 GMT
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA

In article <1992Sep28.193246.12948@spdcc.com> rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue) writes:
>mike@gordian.com (Michael A. Thomas) writes:
>>rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue) writes:

Take it to email, folks.  Who cares?

-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton)
Subject: Re: Toys 'r' Us
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 17:52:37 GMT

In article <thaaang.718352502@cwis> thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance) 
writes:
>
>Ooh! Better yet, airlift me a bundle; I got prospective dates this
>weekend (and I just got the AIDS test back and it was negative! Yay!

AIDS test?  No such thing.  Perhaps you mean the HIV antibody test.  It's
reasonably reliable, but a positive result doesn't mean that you have AIDS,
or ever will, and a negative result doesn't always mean that you're not
infected (although the odds are good).  

Don't count on the results until you've had two negative reslts, 6 months
apart, with no intervening opportunities for infection.
 
-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Hamilton   jfh@netcom.com   P. O. Box 281107   SF, CA   94128-1107
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance)
Subject: Re: evil twins
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 04:55:37 GMT

fjvwing@cs.vu.nl (FJ!!) writes:

>thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance) writes:
>>You'd have to get a weave for the forelock...

>I would?

Huh?

>John, why do you think our squirrel-friend, girl-friend,
				^     <--->    ^	ahem...

>round-the-world-friend thinks we are twins?

You *horrid* *bitch*! I thought I was the *only* *one* in the *world*
with a haircut like this!!! I'm *so* embarassed! I'm going to have to
find some other way to be unique. 150 pounds of piercings are going to
have to be applied posthaste.

(Bet I had mine first! Copycat. God, I can't do *anything* without
you imitating me; Mama Max, make him quit!)

(It *is* pretty damn *European* of me, though, huh? Unless (gasp!)
there are people in *America* with haircuts like this. How Provincial.)

>Did Marcus see you? He has seen me, maybe he could share his opinion in
>how far we'd get in passing as siblings.

He's seen a *lot* of me. And boy, ain't he a babe? So sweet and quiet
and corruptable...

>>You *don't* have clippers yet? 

>Honey, putting clippers in my hands would be dangerous. I mean, I could
>kill someone with them, without even trying, believe me. I need someone
>else to do my hair.

Come on. You can mow a lawn, can't you? They *do* have grass over there,
don't they?

--
John Dorrance * Alleged Homosexual/Shameless Hussy * thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu

			Dark. Handsome. 6 feet tall.
		  31 flavors? I believe he's got 'em all!
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: glp@fig.citib.com (Greg Parkinson)
Subject: Re: enough already.
Originator: glp@merlin
Organization: Citibank IBISM
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 15:42:52 GMT


In article <1992Sep29.022850.1632@reed.edu>, nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:

|> I well remember at least one pissing match with Clay Bond. I said
|> something stupid, and he flamed me. I tried to fight back, but of
|> course the way I tried to fight back was probably to defend the
|> indefensible things I said. 

  [.......]

|> What hurt was that it seemd all of soc.motss was sided with Clay,
|> against me (yes, the cabal existed then). I got so tied up in the
|> emotions of the flame war that I stopped learning anything about the
|> problems with what I was actually saying. The thing that finally
|> turned it around for me was a few letters from motssers saying "look,
|> Clay's going really hard into you and you should just ignore it,
|> because he can be that way.  But you should think about what you are
|> saying, objectively, because it is not too clever."

I'm not sure I follow.  The supposed Cabal
sided with Clay because he was Clay and they
were the Cabal, but in fact Clay was right on
with the facts of the matter - so is it possible
(set *paranoia* 'low) that a number of people,
people whose names you recognized, actually 
agreed with both you and Clay about what you
had said, and that your agreement was a little
slower in coming?

Or what?

-- 
Greg Parkinson                  Phone: 212-657-7814  Fax: 212-825-8607
Citibank,111 Wall Street        E-Mail: glp@fig.citib.com
New York, New York  10043
The opinions expressed are my own and not those of the big 'ol bank.
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: akbar@cs.mcgill.ca (Alain BOUCHARD)
Subject: Re: French imperfect subjunctive (was: My Very Own Out List)
Organization: SOCS - Mcgill University, Montreal, Canada
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 16:53:40 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.150448.17545@macc.wisc.edu> anderson@macc.wisc.edu
(Jess Anderson) writes:
>
>In article <imperfectionist@kaa.gr.osf.org>
>emcmanus@gr.osf.org (Eamonn McManus) writes:
>
>>I am reminded of a French grammar book of mine, which explains that
>>one of the reasons the imperfect subjunctive is no longer used in
>>spoken French is that it tends to sound ridiculous.  They give "que
>>vous assassinassiez" as an example.
>
>I seem to remember that even the French make jokes about
>this.  You say to the charperson mopping at the head of the
>stairs, "Est-ce que vous permettiez que je passasse?" to
>which the reply (though not grammatical) is, "Passassez
>donc!"

                 ,   ^
Vos calembours m'epatates!

Alain
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: fjvwing@cs.vu.nl (FJ!!)
Subject: "It's in the trees! It's coming!" (was: Jess has...)
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 20:00:50 GMT

jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton) writes:
>(John Dorrance) writes:
>>>[I wrote something]
>>(Hey boy, when the fuck are you going to get a picture into the archive?
>Yeah, fj!, we were just talking about that yesterday at an unofficial cabal
>meeting.  Your adoring fans await you!

I searched.

I racked my memory.

I begged Lieneke for one specific neg.

I went through my own sets of negatives.

I made reprints.

I humiliated myself to get time on the flatbed-scanner.

I learned to cope with 'xv.'

I ftp-ed.



Dahlings.

Dahhhhhhhhlings...you've all waited for so long.

Just a few more days....

You can wait a bit more, can't you?

						FJ!! (I just hope you
						won't be dissapointed
						after this.  But hey,
						if I don't hype myself,
						who will?)
From: jns@elea.umd.edu (J. N. Shaumeyer)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: enough already.
Date: 29 Sep 92 04:45:24 GMT
Organization: Militant Homosexual Lobby, Gay Lifestyles, Inc.


Nelson Minar (nelson@reed.edu) recalls former times:
 
> ... so posting to soc.motss just seemed natural.

[unrehearsed, unpractised, spontaneous, the *real* Nelson]

> But this also means I didn't read much before posting, and I was even
> younger then than I am now, ...

Phew!  I was afraid that someone might have changed
the laws of Physics while I wasn't looking.  Or are
we talking usenet.age here?  I still don't quite have
the hang of it.  Seems to me it'd take a rocket
scientist to figure it out.

> ... and I said some really stupid things. Which stupid 
> things, I don't remember. (if anyone has conveniently
> accessible archives of this stuff... )

Yes, dear.  Of course I save all the stupid things
you say.

> Yours in soc.motss.nice,

*So* nice; it was getting rather lonely.

[ObMotssToJD: Papa Shaumeyer is working on the
 picture; first he has to snare his bear with
 the photographic aptitude to take the shots.]

--jns
From: dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: CABAL stuff
Date: 5 Oct 1992 16:10:11 GMT
Organization: sgi
Distribution: world
Reply-To: dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
NNTP-Posting-Host: tattoo.mti.sgi.com

In article <67100@cup.portal.com>, Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison) writes:
|> George Reilly moronicizes:
|> >) (Absolutely *NO* humor intended.)  
|> >No, there wouldn't be, would there.
|> 
|> Why should there be any?  If someone walked up to you on the
|> street, slapped you in the face and said, "DAMN, you're an ugly
|> sonofabitch!" would your first reaction be to *LAUGH*?

Okay, I will try and answer this in a rational fashion.  The difference
between what you are saying here and what gets you riled concerning 
shaving, is that every time shaving is mentioned, your first posting
is a rant against it.  You come in fighting.  You are already riled
before anyone says anything to you personally.  Usually, you enter the
fight insulting people who might want to shave themselves (for whatever
reason).

I like being shaved.  I also like hairy men.  Beard are hot, shaved heads
are hot, shaved bodies are hot, hairy bodies are hot.  Why do you take
it personally when someone says "shaved bodies are hot"?


FWA
From: nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: KATU POLL  10/5/92
Date: 6 Oct 92 06:42:04 GMT
Reply-To: nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar)
Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR

In article <1992Oct6.052242.2790@lclark.edu> snodgras@lclark.edu (Bil Snodgrass) writes:

[wonderful news! Hooray! This is the first poll I've actually *heard*
about, and oh honey is it encouraging.]

>KATU 5 p.m. newscast had a pollester poll for Measure 9.

I'm dying to hear details about this. I heard secondhand that it was a
professional poll of 600+ people "likely to vote" in Portland.

While I'm skeptical of polls in general, this just made my evening.

>Measure 9: Oppose 62%, For 33%, U.D. 5%

you're all invited to the party if we win.
                __
nelson@reed.edu \/                      When you expect flutes, it's whistles
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: amz@iguana.cis.ohio-state.edu (Arnold M Zwicky)
Subject: Re: demuffining
Followup-To: ba.motss.poetry
Summary: for jeff dauber (returned) from jack spicer (deceased)
Organization: earnestly practicing faggots
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 00:44:17 GMT

[from spicer's _language_ (1965)...]

" `Arf,' says Sandy"
"To come to the moment of never come back
   to the moment of hope.   Too many buses
   that are late" Hugh O'Neill in our
   Canto for Ezra Pound.
The ground still squirming.  The ground still
   not fixed as I thought it would be in
   an adult world.
Sandy growls like a wolf.   The space
   between him and his image is greater
   than the space between me and my image.
Throw him a honey-cake.   Hell has been proved
   to be a series of image.
Death is a dog and Little Orphan Annie
My own Eurydice.   Going into hell so many
   times tears it
Which explains poetry.
From: dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: demuffining
Date: 29 Sep 92 22:56:48 GMT
Reply-To: dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
Organization: sgi
NNTP-Posting-Host: tattoo.mti.sgi.com

In article <1992Sep29.220846.12311@quantime.co.uk>, roger@quantime.co.uk (Roger 
|> Fuck off.

|> Fuck off.

|> Yes.  Now, fuck off.


Oh! If this is the way that I am going to be treated here, I guess I
will never post again.  I see why people never post to motss if this is
the treatment they get!!!!!



FWA
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: lisbon@vpnet.chi.il.us (Gerry Swetsky)
Subject: Re: Ri-Jen goes to Dallas 9/25-27
Organization: Vpnet Public Access
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 02:03:55 GMT

In article <1992Sep23.162305.25709@oakhill.sps.mot.com> rjchou@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Ri Jen Chou) writes:
>Hi folks,
>
>I'll be in Dallas Sept 25 - 27.   Anybody interested in getting
>together?  There's a dim-sum scheduled for Sun.  Please call
>Ying-Da Lee at 214/518-3490 (w) or 214/492-5212 (h) if interested
>for directions and time.  Otherwise email me or call me at
>512/441-4696 (h) 512/891-3365 to make plans.

    Two of my favorite people at the same place at one time?  It's
    almost worth a special trip to Big D.  No fair talking about me!

--
============================================================================
| B4 f+ g++ d t w k+:    S4/7 b++ g l/- y+ z o x- a j+ v    Gerry Swetsky  |
|                vpnet - Public access Unix and Usenet                     |
| Home (708)833-8122       vpnet (708)833-8126      lisbon@vpnet.chi.il.us |
============================================================================