From: George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca (George Lin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.taiwan
Subject: Re: abortion, homosexuality vs. Christians (Was: Racial Prob
Date: 30 Jul 92 12:50:23 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: world

> Those people have been accepted (or committed, might be a better word).

Well, I'm glad we agree on something here.  We're off to a good start.

>+ It's naive to say "what I do behind my closed doors is my business and you
>+ should mind your own."  Society regulates what you can and cannot do behind
>+ closed doors.  (ie. do drugs, have sexual relations with a minor, etc).
>+ People in turn can affect these regulations through various means, one of
>+ which is to be vocal about their views.
> 
> Right, society does for some extent regulate what you SHOULD and SHOULD NOT
> do.  However, it is considered harrassment by law (ahh, a typical way society
> tells you what you should and shouldn't do), 

Harrassment?  What in the world are you talking about?  Maybe you sould read
the paragraph again?

> and I guess you'd support Concentration camps of the Thirs Reich since they
> are merely more-vocally eliminating undesirable races.

Gee, are you replying to usenet.hitler.advocacy?
Your logic is bizzare.

> jesus (what a f*ckin' stupid name)

Obviously, this is totally irrelevant.

And you probably don't have any friends named "Jesus" either.
Maybe you should cross post to usenet.soc.culture.hispanic.

On the other hand, "Ching" seems quite peculiar.

> No, I'm not against christians at all; I'm just highly against christians who
> think like you and have the mentality of a slug.  The word "irrational" can't
> be applied to religion without generating some laughter.

Well, if your mental capacity does not allow you to apply the word
"irrational" to religion, please don't.

> No, I don't think I know it all;
> that's also why I never said "I know it all."

This statement is totaly hypocricy.
It's blatantly evident from you posting that you do think you know it all.

> Here's a piece of advise:  You (and all christians like you) should change
> your basic believe that you're 100% right and that everyone else is 100%
> wrong.  Ok, so jesus (BTW, his a fake, Ching is your true God) treatens to
> send you to hell if you deviate a little... but you shouldn't give in to
> threats; go with your logic.

(What an ignorant statement.
"Take this dollar and buy yourself a clue")

Right, and I expect you to change you basic belief and accept Jesus as
the true God in return.

> Just to show you take jesus isn't for real.  Here's a deal I'll leave you
> (and other christians like you) with,  if jesus is God, may he kill you
> before
> your next posting to prive his existence!

The typical "if God really exists, then I challenge him to strike me down"
arguement.

If Jesus did kill me, then that would mean that you are in deed greater
than Jesus, because you can instruct him to carry out your wishes.

Sorry, you lose.

> Rest assured that was not a curse since he's not God.  Remember, the only God
> is Ching.  But Ching is generous, he'll still let you go to heaven eventhough
> you've spent all your life worshipping jesus.

Well, let's see here....

1) If Ching is the true god, then you'll go to heaven...regardless.
2) If Jesus is the true God, then you'll go to hell if you worship Ching.
3) If Jesus is the true God, then you'll go to heaven if you worship Jesus.

Well, logically, I would pick to worship Jesus, because then I'm guaranteed
to go to heaven.

Now, if you choose Ching, there is that possibility that you'll go to hell.
And if the Ching refers to yourself, then I would have to say that
"Ching is the true dog."


--

 -------------------------------------------
| George Lin                  | 145.270 MHz |
| George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca   |   VE7FKU    |
 -------------------------------------------