HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: brian@quake.sylmar.ca.us (Brian K. Yoder)
Subject: Re: Supermodels contribute to spiraling low self esteem?
Organization: Quake Public Access
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:14:22 GMT

In article <Bxtt3E.9s4@news.cso.uiuc.edu> levine@symcom.math.uiuc.edu (Lenore Levine) writes:
>brian@quake.sylmar.ca.us (Brian K. Yoder) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov12.182022.9195@tellab5.tellabs.com> chrz@tellabs.com (Peter Chrzanowski) writes:
>>>In article <1dsbfhINN8hi@bigboote.WPI.EDU>, cor@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Cory Shimer) writes:
>>>> If someone makes you feel relatively unattractive by what they say
>>>> or do, and then you happen to see some poster of some supermodel...

>>Perhaps feminists would feel better about themselves if the only pictures
>>in magazine ads, posters, etc. were of ugly sloppy pathetic women.  Is that
>                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>a solution to their self-esteem problems?  I doubt it.

>Just a quick question, Brian. Why do you equate not being
>very good looking, and not putting that much energy into
>one's appearance, with being pathetic?

You are reading your own prejudices into what I wrote.  I meant ugly AND
sloppy AND pathetic.  Of course there are ugly women who aren't pathetic
and sloppy women who aren't pathetic, but I was just pointing out that
instead of putting well-dressed beautiful energetic women in the ads, 
the opposite would be no more apealing. 

>Why is a woman like Marie Curie, Golda Meir or Harriet Tubman
>more pathetic than a woman like Marla Maples, Madonna, or 
>Vanna White? 

They weren't.  Stop putting words in my mouth.  I never said nor implied that.

>I think it would be more fun to be one of the former three, myself.
>At any rate, I suspect they had more fun in bed (not having
>to project sexy vibes for economic reasons).

That's an odd conclusion.  I would expect that since sexual fulfilment is
psychological rather than physical, you can't tell, just from looking at them
how they were in bed.  Besides, why are you bringing that into this? It
has nothing to do with the discussion at hand.

You also didn't answer my question about whether you would prefer ugly
sloppy pathetic women in ads to beautiful slick active ones.

--Brian
From: egilmour@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re:  the most beautiful women in the world
Date: 15 Nov 92 21:08:49 -0400
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Well, here's my list of the 5 most beautiful people:

-  Daniel Day Lewis;
-  Keanu Reeves;
-  John Cussack;
-  Uma Thurman; and
-  Winona Ryder.

As for supermodels, what about:

-  Christy Turlington;
-  Rachel Williams;
-  Famke;
-  Emma S.; and who can deny it 
-  Cindy Crawford.

Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: stucs203@bham.ac.uk (Richard Allan)
Subject: HELP
Originator: usenet@rs6000.bham.ac.uk
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:21:21 GMT
Organization: The University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

I'm limited in space of stuff I can get over usenet. So does anybody know
where I can download these gifs by FTP.

       Replies urgently as I would like to see the Cindy gif

     Stucs203@bham.ac.uk (Richard Allan)
From: jsp@uts.amdahl.com (James Preston)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: Sexual harassment on the net??
Date: 19 Nov 92 18:11:12 GMT
Reply-To: jsp@pls.amdahl.com
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1ee65eINNs3c@gap.caltech.edu>:

}The comment that if yd believes yd is being harassed, then yd IS being
}harassed opens a sizable can of worms.  If a person is considered
}harassed simply because yd says yd is, then there will be people who will

Um, "yd"?  Pardon my ignorance, but is this something that you personally
made up, or am I just now discovering yet another PC attempt to mangle the 
English language?

--James Preston
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: johnr@ee.uts.edu.au (John Reekie)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: Calendars and Brains
Date: 17 Nov 92 16:59:43 GMT
Organization: University of Technology, Sydney
NNTP-Posting-Host: rossi.ee.uts.edu.au

rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari) writes:

>	Ok, one last question, just for you, Elle:

OK, one question only, just for you, Robert:

>	Describe the geographic position of the United States
>	of America.

Describe the geographic position of the Commonwealth
of Australia.

No maps or sneaky cheating allowed.
From: bheess@mcws.fidonet.org (Brian L. Heess)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: Do all supermodels sm
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 20:49:17 PST
Reply-To: bheess@mcws.fidonet.org
Distribution: world
Organization: midnight computer wiring society - Tujunga, CA, USA

colin.buckley@rose.com (colin buckley) writes:

> Date Entered: 11-13-92 04:51
> B(>I have heard it said that smoking can contribute to weight loss, or at
>   >least not eating, since I suppose it relates to something being in your
>   >mouth...but, smoking probably has something to do with weight on a
>   >chemical/heatlh level, as well.  I wonder if that has something to do
>   >with these models smoking.
> 
> It's not smoking, but nevertheless.  Chewing gum (which is also in "your
> mouth") makes you hungry as the stomach is anticpating food and producing
> saliva.  I'd say smoking is more like breathing, which obviously requires foo
> energy like everything else the body does.  But what do I know...  I've see a
> few zombies that would disagree.

<grin>  I hear you!

-Brian

--
Home:  bheess@mcws.fidonet.org  Bang:  ..!{elroy,oxy}!mcws!bheess
Work:  bheess@Xircom.com        BOTH:  bheess@oxy.cheshire.edu
Fido:  Brian Heess 1:102/851  BBS 818-352-2993 v32b/v42b/HST
PhHm:  818-353-0727  PhWk: /dev/null || 818-878-7161
:      -=* I believe in something strange - Psychotic Waltz *=-
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 14:57:25 EST
From: <LXP111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: that's IT!

Hey Jen, I have the same problem wit da women on this net..heh heh heh.  Hey
since were both netsexobjects...will you do me baby fuck me.....just kidding ag
ain.
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: good@pixar.com (If you tell the truth you won't have to remember anything.)
Subject: Re: Brains of Models
Keywords: beauty and brains
Organization: Pixar - Pt. Richmond, CA USA
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:33:26 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.185231.17480@husc3.harvard.edu> dchou@husc11.harvard.edu (David Chou) writes:
:
:Anyone else want to debunk the myth of beautiful = dumb? I'm now
:quite tired of being the only person in this group who speaks out
:along these lines. 

You're not the only one.  A few weeks ago I posted the remarks of a model,
who was a NASA computer scientist, stating that it made it hard to do her
job when people treated her as though she were stupid.

Face it.  Anybody who can generalize the intelligence of a person by their
appearance is at best a poor observer and most likely stupid themselves.  I
haven't found any correlation, and I doubt there is one.

Anybody with that kind of attitude is unlikely to find work photographing
models, and if they do their pictures aren't likely to be much good.  Even
if the model you're working with is as thick as two short planks, you aren't
going to get much cooperation by treating her that way.

		--Craig
-- 
	good@pixar.com
	Make Welfare as hard to get as Bulding Permits
From: epasls@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Cindy cc052.gif (6/5)...See ya.-Later...
Date: 16 Nov 92 19:02:41 CST
X-From: epasls@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
X-Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica
Followup-To: alt.supermodels,alt.binaries.pictures.erotica

X-Date: 13 Nov 92 03:18:24 CST
X-Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

Howdy all,
I realize I've cost networks a lot of money by posting
so much cindy, but why dont you just lay down and say
"hey, who cares, its the bic CC"

Please dont ask for reposts if your server/whatever couldnt 
handle the barrage because i will politely ignore all mail
of that content.(ask someone whos server could handle it to 
forward it as email or something)

anyway, this is pretty much my goodbye to a.b.p.e,
its been nice but pix take up too much disk space
and time in general. I offer these white hot pix as
a goodbye present, and for those who know the ftp site
that has these pix, would you for everyone's sake just
keep it hush-hush, ok.

Later...

BTW(I know it will kill alt.supermodels but I am going to crosspost there
as well{in daily chunks of 1 pic, as to let everyone get them})
and if for some reason my pix are corrupt(which they sure as hell shouldn't
be) then feel free to mailbomb me(I would deserve it)


for a .sig! read my signature on "prelude to cindy post"

and for those who think jpegs would have been better- I tried
and they didn't come out well, and i wont take the time to
fiddle around with the numbers you gif jpeg because that would
take farrr to much time.


I bid you all farewell(back to alt.games.sf2 for me :} )

Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: good@pixar.com ("To go up, pull back on the yoke. To go down, pull back more.")
Subject: Re: Cindy & Elle in new movies???
Organization: Pixar - Pt. Richmond, CA USA
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 08:38:39 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.104913.14324@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> bjbartlett@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (I'm not really a doctor...) writes:
:  This my have been posted here before (if so I lost it in all the garbage
:about harrasment that belongs in another group!), but is Cindy's voice in
:Aladin?  Several of us are trying to figure it out, and can't wait until it
:opens to find out. 

I didn't see her name in the credits at the San Francisco press screening
of "Aladdin", and since there's really only one female lead, I really doubt
that Cindy's voice is in the film. 

		--Craig
-- 
	good@pixar.com
	Make Welfare as hard to get as Bulding Permits
From: not@who.you.think
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: erica.gif (part 1/1)
Date: 17 Nov 92 21:05:05 GMT
Organization: New York University


	This is not Erica Eleniak. It is Julie McCullough.
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: 9204474@cuslm.ca (MORIN PETER JOHN)
Subject: Shout out to Jennifer
Keywords: Jennifer
Organization: Centre d'Informatique, Centre universitaire Saint-Louis-Maillet
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:11:47 GMT

Dear Jennifer,

I don't know what to say I thought us men were better than that,I would just 
like to say on behave of the men from the University of Moncton That are on 
the net,we are sorry that you were put through that kind of harrassment and 
we know that if we were ever to talk to you on the net,we would treat you 
with dignity and respect because of the nice way you treat everyone all the 
time.I'm just hoping that this guy can be caught and dealt with because we 
would'nt like to see him hurt you like this again or any other women for 
that fact.

Like to hear from you again,
Peter Morin
Department of Education,University of Moncton,Edmunstun NB,Canada.
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: brant@seq.uncwil.edu (AT-Dreamer)
Subject: Re: 5 MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN HILBERT SPACE
Organization: Univ. of North Carolina @ Wilmington
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:19:38 GMT

jaf7625@zeus.tamu.edu (The 20 Minute Void) writes:

>Well, I'd taken a brief holiday from the net only to find this top-5-women 
>debate raging on my return ... So, here are my two centissimi:

>(These are not in order btw -- when you're in the top 5, that's enough, eh?)

>1. Sophie Marceau  (a too little known French actress)
>2. Lysette Anthony  (a too little known British actress, the one in _Krull_)
>3. Elizabeth Taylor (ca. 1953!!)
>4. Marilyn Monroe (ca. 1955)
>5. Ariel (of the Little Mermaid) ... Whoooop!

>If you know all of these babes, you'll notice that they all have a certain 
>feature in common ... Any guesses ...?

>                                                               Jake 

They all smell like fish :-)

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| "What doesn't kill us makes us stronger"  Spoken by many A.T. hikers         |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: alt.elvis.sighting,alt.magnus.and.ketil,alt.religion.kibology,alt.politics.kibo
From: magnus@bark-fddi.ii.uib.no (Magnus Alvestad)
Subject: Elvis alive and well
Reply-To: magnus@ii.uib.no
Organization: UVBS -> SFK/T-DSA / SOPS - HOS / RNoN
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 02:52:31 GMT

I see there is a lot of misinformation here. I'll bring you all up to
date. Last month I was in Brazil to see god. He's hiding there from
all the fanatics, at the same time keeping an eye on Hitler. When the
alien chauffeurs drove from the secret airport to god's 'Heaven'
bungalow, I saw Graceland between the trees! 

Sort of figures, doesn't it. Anyone know anyone else living in Brazil?
I looked for Xibo/Xxibo, but I didn't see him.

-Magnus
Newsgroups: alt.elvis.sighting,alt.magnus.and.ketil,alt.religion.kibology,alt.politics.kibo
From: graeme@fulcrum.co.uk (Graeme Hodgson)
Subject: Re: Elvis alive and well
Organization: Fulcrum Communications
Distribution: uk, no 
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 13:29:44 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.025231.10800@alf.uib.no> magnus@ii.uib.no writes:
>I see there is a lot of misinformation here. I'll bring you all up to
>date. Last month I was in Brazil to see god. He's hiding there from
>all the fanatics, at the same time keeping an eye on Hitler. When the
>alien chauffeurs drove from the secret airport to god's 'Heaven'
>bungalow, I saw Graceland between the trees! 
>
>Sort of figures, doesn't it. Anyone know anyone else living in Brazil?
>I looked for Xibo/Xxibo, but I didn't see him.

Ronnie Biggs?

>-Magnus

Graeme

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   G. J. Hodgson                    |   "Shit!  I've burnt the
                                    |    bloody cakes!"
   Email to G.Hodgson@fulcrum.co.uk |
   - whenever the mood takes you.   |                  - Alfred, King c.900AD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky alt.elvis.sighting:55 alt.magnus.and.ketil:31 alt.religion.kibology:4721 alt.politics.kibo:271
From: franklir@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Ryan J Franklin )
Newsgroups: alt.elvis.sighting,alt.magnus.and.ketil,alt.religion.kibology,alt.politics.kibo
Subject: Re: Elvis alive and well
Date: 16 Nov 92 15:24:19 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

In article <1992Nov16.025231.10800@alf.uib.no> magnus@ii.uib.no writes:
>I see there is a lot of misinformation here. I'll bring you all up to
>date. Last month I was in Brazil to see god. He's hiding there from
>all the fanatics, at the same time keeping an eye on Hitler. When the
>alien chauffeurs drove from the secret airport to god's 'Heaven'
>bungalow, I saw Graceland between the trees! 

Misinformation indeed.  What you saw was in fact the obscurely famous 
Cargo Graceland constructed entirely out of used toilet tissue by the
SpammaKibo rainforest tribe.  Not unlike the famous "Cargo Cults" of
the Pacific, the SpammaKibos believe that, once they've built it, the
King will come (or at the very least, Priscilla--woo woo!).
 
Sadly, the SpammaKibos have yet to lure Elvis himself into visiting
their near-perfect reproduction.  I think he and the "Bat Boy" are
currently visiting every Six Flags amusement park and puking on the
guys who run the roller coasters.

Then again, that might just be a deception orchestrated by the McNazi
Misinformation and McNugget Bureau to throw us all off.  Ever since they
abducted the King to test Shamrock Shake formula #56 on him, Elvis's
whereabouts have been largely unknown.

--
The story you have just read | "By the time they got the elevator going an
tonight is true.  Only the   |  hour later, I had dead bodies all around
names have been changed to   |  me--and man, that just wasn't any fun at all."
protect Ryan Franklin, and   |           -- 'Cheap Perfume Kills 6!'
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Tig Stone)
Subject: Re: The name "alt.m&k" contains an illegal character.
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
	<1992Nov15.170204.23635@tc.cornell.edu> <Bxrq5q.HF7@unix.amherst.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 19:06:09 GMT


In article <Bxrq5q.HF7@unix.amherst.edu> twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

> In article <1992Nov15.170204.23635@tc.cornell.edu> mdw@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Matt Welsh) writes:

>>>PS Every fan reading this: mail your favourite poem to 
>>>
>>>	twpierce@unix.amherst.edu
>>
>>Thou Timmest of the Tims
>>In Thy Humble Name we envoke Thee;
>>Createth Thou Our Propos-ed Group,
>>And We Shall Forever Adore Thee.

> God.  It could be Amherst's anthem.  I puke.

Whaddaya say, how about an RFD for rec.arts.poems.tim-pierce?

And then we could RFD for soc.culture.tim-pierce after the uproar that
one causes.


In jest,
--
Tig Stone 
(oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu)
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC)
Subject: Re: Newgroups have made it out
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 15:16:46 GMT

In article <15NOV199219441969@acad3.alaska.edu> sean@freds.cojones.com writes:
>[deleted]
>
>No thanks to Mr. Kienenberger.  Mike, maybe one of these days you'll
>be lucky enough to get a clue.  For your sake, I sure hope so.
>

Sean, maybe one of these days you will quit being such a cry baby.
For your sake, I sure hope so.


Mike
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: cairnss@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Ghost with the Most=)
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: moving alt.vampyres -> alt.horror.vampyres
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:25:31 GMT

I
think that sounds like a horrible Idea, Really leave alt.vampyres where
it is. Don't bother moving it for the sake of organization, or anything 
at all, keep it alt.vampyres.  alt.vampyres is not specifically for
discussion of the horror fiction aspect of vampyrism, and although
this does go on a great deal, there are a number of other vampyre
topics that don't in my opinion belong in alt.horror.vampyres.

I say alt.vampyres stays alt.vampyres.

-- 
         %            I am the shadow child of my world.          % 
        %                 cairnss@ucsu.Colorado.EDU                %
       %    F1V]D('-A=F4@=&AE(%%U965N+"!';V0@8FQE<W,@=7,@06QL+@I    %
 
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mr. Furr)
Subject: alt.horror.spam?
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 13:08:31 GMT

It's apparent that there's some support out there for a spam newsgroup.	
The question I now have is:

should it be alt.food.spam or alt.horror.spam?

:)
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Friday, 20 Nov 1992 15:49:23 EST
From: <IO20650@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Alt.Spam and alt.databases.paradox
Distribution: world,local
 <y7uDuB1w165w@cybrspc.UUCP> <1992Nov18.100557.1@cubldr.colorado.edu>
 <1992Nov18.211955.13918@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
 <1992Nov19.001207.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu>


In article <1992Nov19.001207.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu>,
f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin) says:
>go for the subgroup:
>
>alt.fan.monty-python.spam
But this isn't a Monty Python Spam loving group!  It was requested by myself,
so I know what the orriginal intent was.  It was to have a Church of Spam, and
other Spam related topics as it's main course, and perhaps a side dish of
vikings!
--- SPREADER@GANDALF.UMCS.MAINE.EDU  []  IO20650@MAINE.MAINE.EDU ---
                 THANATOS%AILANTH@UUCP.WANG.COM
              ANDREW TURNER/THANATOS/DAERR/LEDARR
   "SPAM!  ALL HAIL GAVIN, AND HIS WONDERFUL CHURCH OF SPAM!" - ARJAII
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.discordia,alt.slack
From: spreader@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU (Andrew E. Turner)
Subject: Re:    PROPOSAL: Alt.Spam
Keywords: Spam, religion, altgroup
Organization: University of Maine Department of Computer Science
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:29:17 GMT

In article <92319.154407IO20650@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>, <IO20650@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes:
|> We of the Spam loving minority wish a Newsgroup of our own.  We want a place
|> where Spam can be slung freshly everyday, for all to see and gawk at!.  We are
|> perfectly serious.  We only want ONE measly alt group, not the many, many that
|> our sla...er members suggested.  Spamists arise!  Post your support for all to
|> screem at!!

WE WANT SPAM!  WE WANT SPAM!!  Post for SPAM!  Show your support of SPAM!
EVERYONE wants SPAM!
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: ksdavis@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Karleenus Schwartz Davis)
Subject: Re: Expansion of alt.fan.rush-limbaugh proposed
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:33:11 GMT

>ksdavis@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Karleenus Schwartz Davis) writes:
>>
>> [. . .]  because it's going to be around forever, just like every
>>other alt.* group.  Rmgroups don't work in alt.*.  [. . .]

mike@raven.alaska.edu (Mike Kienenberger) writes:
>This attitude really irks me.  Groups *are* rmgroup'able in alt.  

And they get newgrouped the next day.  Groups that move never die --
people still read alt.mud.  It doesn't matter if *you* honor rmgroups;
you're only one site and it doesn't stop traffic from being split.  My
suggestion to the alt.fan.rush-limbaugh people was to leave off the
a.f.r-l.politics group and use the existing group for that, since some
sites would alias them together and some wouldn't.  No use risking a
split in traffic of you can head it off at the pass.

>Not all sites pay attention to rmgroups, but those who care about the
>ongoing viability of alt do.  Let the other sites fill up with tons of
>garbage groups.  Eventually those sites will have to deal with the
>problem when their software or hardware can no longer handle the load.

Tell it to Meredith Tanner.

-sz
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight)
Subject: Re: alt.binaries.pics.nudge&wink (important message, flame war to start)
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 07:07:46 GMT


Chuq von Rospach posts a message in which he suggests that he is going to
stop carrying and forwarding copyright-violating materials on machines
for which he's responsible.

Bravo!

I'm appalled that this has been permitted to go on for as long as it
has.

Anticipating messages objecting to this on various grounds, including
wrapping oneself in the flag, in cries of censorship, and in cries
of it's o.k. to violate laws the speaker thinks unfair, let me suggest
that any such responses constitute advocating the commission of a crime
and are out of court on their face.

I post the above paragraph prior to any responses to Chuq (that I've
seen) so that nobody takes it personally.

Although Chuq anticipates a flame war about this, it should be possible
for civilized, intelligent, and educated people to discuss this issue,
which is substantive, calmly, and without resort to personal remarks.

-- 
David Sternlight
(pgp 2.0 and ripem public keys available on request)

Newsgroups: alt.config
From: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Subject: alt.hypnosis
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 00:26:58 GMT

  Well, I've received many comments in favor of alt.hypnosis, and none
opposed to it (the one issue was whether to call it
alt.psychology.hypnosis, but the consensus seemed to be that it would
unnecessarily reduce the scope of the group from what it was intended
to be).  So unless I get some particularly vitriolic flames in the
next 24 hours or so, I will send out a newgroup message for this
group.

--
Jonathan Lennox
jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu