From: chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu (DEVASTATOR OF PATRICK HUMPHREY to you, PatricKKK) 
Subject: Re: NEXT: PatricKKK Harumphrey
Originator: chaneysa@nextnet
Organization: California State University Sacramento
Distribution: world 
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 03:40:22 GMT


This is the continuing story of PatricKK Harumphrey. This chapter: the
utter crumbling of his long-standing efforts at making constant and
false charges about my accounts, who I post as, and his blatantly
racist remark which he has been forced by circumstances beyond his
control, to retract. (Circumstances = friends as well as enemies
chastising him.) 

Patrick Humphrey, suffice it to say that you voluntarily crumbled
yourself so much in this article, by blatant admissions that 
virtually every attempt by you, to attack me, has failed, that you are
of no further relevance. 

Everyone now knows just how severely I've pounded you, and it would
really be luney for me to continue to heap more verbal and emotional
abuse on your already troubled self. 

In other words, I've made my point: you lost the war with me.   

In article <Bu9xun.2H3@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (That's MISTER Patrick L. Humphrey to you, Steve.) writes:
>In article <1992Sep8.151810.9463@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu (Steve Chaney : Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.0) writes:
>>
>How about if we want to see you act like the little psychopath you are on
>the net?  (I guess I'll just have to hit the ol' space bar, in that case.)

So when you're on the roll and bashing someone, they're assholes and
you're hot shit, but when they come back and burn you to ashes,
they're psychopaths? 

I like that. 

>>This is some rampant verbal abuse for one of the most rampant verbally
>>abusive and racist, and actually powerful, butt-heads on USENET - PatricKKK
>>L. (short for Liar) Harumphrey. He is probably the most relentless and
>>pointedly hard-shooting enemy I've had on USENET, worse than the loudmouth
>>Mark Kaufman or the pot-shot-taking Susan Garvin, and CERTAINLY, the
>>one most focused on shooting me down - or helping me shoot myself down.
>>Both such efforts of his, have failed. This is the story, folks. 
>
>Abusive?  racist?  *powerful*?  This is hilarious, Chaney.  Where do you
>get the imagination to come up with these fantasies, anyway?  (You know,
>you'd do better if you'd quit shooting yourself down so much...)

Well, I was wrong about powerful. You really *are* a powerless little
scum-sucking barnacle's ass licker. And as for abusive? How could I
really feel pain from little prickniks like you? Hell, even ants
couldn't be hurt by you.  

But as for the racist part... let's review the evidence, eh? 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on, Steve.  Let's see just how much of a boy you are.  March your
fat black ass down here and tell me I'm a liar, to my face.  (I hope
you don't mind doing it in the presence of a few witnesses, and I hope
you like being humiliated.  On second thought, why should *I* care what
you think?  What you get, you won't expect.)
 
--PLH, thankful he's not a parent to such a waste of DNA as one Steve Chaney
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Right after that, you said you wouldn't apologize to me directly, and
that I'd have to come to Texas to get that apology. 

You weren't MAN enough to give that apology on the same communication
medium where you committed the offense. 

And now "I will never receive that apology. EVER." 

Fine with me. At least I had the manlihood (well, let's face it, it's
not just a manly thing to do - all human beings can do it) to
apologize to Jay Stein and then back the hell off. 

But there is a big difference: I won some and retreated when the
losses started running high with Jay Stein. YOU, on the other hand,
won no battles against me, got caught in lie after prefabricated lie,
and just CONTINUED to attack. Damn the losses, you were going to get
me sooner or later. 

Well, it didn't happen. My credibility has outlasted yours by a long
shot, and the caseload against you now is longer than the Great Wall
of China. 

>>Patrick Humphrey. The one man who has hunted me in the most relentless
>>fashion, on USENET. The one man who, at one time during the summer,
>>generated more Steve Chaney responses than, in all likelihood, anyone else
>>combined. Not even Larry Margolis or Gordon Storga have matched the volume
>>of stuff I have seen from you.
>
>Not bad for someone who wasn't even here for two and a half weeks, either...
>but hey, it's not my fault if you in your lunatic way decided I'd be an easy
>target.

So you missed the other 6+ months I've been solidly on here, listening to
your endless b.s. and lies? 

>>Patrick Humphrey. The man who has a pattern of scanning my accounts to see
>>if I'm there, or, possible, also what I'm up to. The man who was the first
>>to alert all of talk.abortion that I, indeed, was no longer on ATHENA. The
>>man who e-mailed me first, when I appeared on ATHENA again, to tell me that
>>he also had another account. (Whoopee!)
>
>Oh, *really*?  Let's see -- "finger" is all I need to see if you're around
>at athena.  I guess you can't do that from your precious little NeXT Cube.
>Indeed, finger was returning "???" for your account at athena -- which means
>the user name isn't recognized by the specified hostname.  When you came
>back to athena, YOU e-mailed ME with a bunch of your racist garbage.
>(In other words, your first paragraph is about what I'd normally expect of 
>you:  nothing even close to the truth.)

HEY, PATRICKKK !!!

WHEN YOU FINGER NEXTNET, YOU GET A <CONNECTION REFUSED> RESPONSE ! 

WHY DON'T YOU TELL THE TRUTH ? 

>>Patrick Humphrey. The man who told us during the summer that I could not be
>>found on NEXTNET, and who probably hence cannot understand why I have been
>>posting from NEXTNET since the near end of Spring 1992.
>
>Lies again, huh, Dennis?  I said I couldn't finger nextnet.csus.edu -- and I
>can't from here.  That says something about you -- posting from a site you know I can't finger.  (One other loony-tune has reacted that way -- yer old pal
>Wavy Davy Rasmussen, the CompSci major.) I never said you couldn't be found
>there, but you already know that anyway -- but hey, why should you tell the
>truth?

Why don't you do a "finger @nextnet.ccs.csus.edu," mister computer
literate? You'll find that NO ONE shows up. In fact, THIS is what
you'll get: 

	[nextnet.ccs.csus.edu]connect: Connection refused

I am, by no means, missing, as you said clearly in your article. Why
not just reprint that article so we can all see what you said? Of
course, I'm right, so you won't dig it up. 

I post from this site because it's FASTER. NeXTNET posts almost 
100 times faster than ATHENA.

And now, ATHENA has no READNEWS system in it. NeXTNET does. 

>>The man who obviously pays more attention to me than to his own wife. I
>>fear the implications of THAT. (More pit bulls in the front yard! Yeah,
>>that'll do it...)
>
>Yeah.  Right.  I guess that's why I've been living over at Hermann Hospital
>the past seven days?  (Oh, well.  I know reality never *was* your specialty.)

Why? Because your wife is getting a sex change so she'll really be
female? 

>>Patrick Humphrey. The man who took his cue from Scott Roby and created YET
>>ANOTHER Steve Chaney alias. While Scott Roby was busy manufacturing more
>>fake (and ultimately unprovable) evidence for his Dennis Hall prank,
>>Patrick Humphrey was busy playing copy-cat, attempting to accuse me of
>>posting as - you guessed it - Conrad Vincent.
>
>Really?  That's kinda funny, since you *did* post something with a header
>on it that was identical to one that Conrad would have had on his posts --
>but you forgot about the "Sender:" line, which gave it away.  I guess your 
>memory isn't reliable enough to go back that far, though.

Oh, golly gee, maybe because he sent it to me to post for him and I
noted in public on USENET that I was posting it for him. AND,
PatricKKK, he verified it to you, Siren and others. 

YOU stated that I was posing as Conrad Vincent and referred to me as
"Chaney/Hall/Vincent" SEVERAL TIMES. 

OWN UP, ASSHOLE. I caught you and stopped you dead in your tracks. 

>>I defeated Patrick Humphrey squarely, causing him to back down, and then
>>claim that he never accused me of that in the first place. Actually, Conrad
>>Vincent and I, both hit him at once.
>
>I must have been somewhere else, then -- I never saw any trace of two drooling
>morons, and loathsome bigots to boot.  More of that overactive imagination,
>perhaps?

Yeah, you were off in Jerry Brown Land. Inhaling with Bill Clinton. 

>>Patrick Humphrey. The big Texan who read my article claiming that
>>pro-aborts, with fetal tissue transplants on the horizon, now REALLY DO
>>NEED dead babies (even if fetuses aren't babies, anencephalic infants ARE),
>>and then told me to march my ass down there and tell him, a diabetic, to
>>his face, that pro-aborts need dead babies.
>
>Yep -- and in your typical chickenshit fashion, you've run and hid, just like
>I said you would.  (I really hope *your* pancreas goes out on you, and then
>see how you like living with the reality of having to be dependent on a 
>bottle of insulin for the rest of your life.  I've been doing that for 
>longer than you've been alive, little boy.)

You know what I think about your bottle of insulin, asshole? Well,
that would contradict pro-life, so I won't think that way. Even for
assholes like you. 

I haven't run and hid one bit, Patrick. Are you saying I'm not
answering you now? Are you back in Jerry Brown Land again? 

I don't give a damn if you're dying and crawling across the ground
begging to drink from dogs' piss bowls, you don't kill someone else to
get insulin or anything else. 

And the moment you try to get the law to let you do that, people like
me will come along and stop those laws and then throw that defeat in
your face.
Well, not in the faces of pro-aborts in general, but rather, in
PatricKKK's face. A special case, of course. 

>>PatricKKK Humphrey. The man who then turned around and denied the very
>>articles he wrote, telling me that I had better come march my fat black
>>ass, as he referred to me, down there, and say he was a liar, to his face.
>
>Damn straight -- and like the cowardly little beat-off you are, you ran
>away and whined.  That's just about what I'd expect from someone whose
>emotional age seems to be fixed at about four years.

I pounded you, caught you in lies that you now admit were "mistakes"
(to cover up for your lies, obviously), and stayed on your back about
it because you have relentlessly stayed on my back ever since... I've
been chasing you all over USENET and you call me a run-and-hide
coward?  

Sure, I ran away - to stash the loot I gained after bashing your ass
all over USENET for your LIES. 

And as you admitted, I was quite successful in that. 

As for meeting you face to face, why don't you come up to Sacramento
and step on my lawn and challenge ME to my FACE? Any guesses as to the
immediate outcome, PatricKKK? 

>>In front of his witnesses. No one has ever referred to anyone on this
>>newsgroup in that kind of manner, calling them "fat chinese ass" or "fat
>>Iranian ass" or whatever - only Patrick Humphrey, from Klans country in
>>Houston, Texas, could have missed the teaching in school that you NEVER
>>refer to someone derogatorily by their race - you don't refer to them by
>>"your fat black ass." You refer to them, at worst, as "your fat ass." Of
>>course, Ku Klux Klan families never teach their kids that.
>
>Keep it up, Steve.  You're going to wind up apologizing to a *lot* of people
>in Kentucky...and Virginia...and Georgia...and Indiana...and Florida...and
>Tennessee...and Oklahoma...and Minnesota...and the Dakotas.  (You might
>just have to apologize to a few people at CSUS, too, once they get a copy
>of your words of "wisdom" -- you never know who might get to see what you're
>wasting the taxpayers' money on up there in Sacramento.)

People at CSUS read that racist comment and could not BELIEVE anyone
of the pro-choice side would ever make that kind of statement. 

It's a kind of running joke around here, PatricKKK. Wait'll it hits
the sysadmins; they'll be laughing their asses off and then shaking
their heads about how no pro-abort should be identified with you.

You have already become a MAJOR waste of taxpayers' money. 

>>Then, he wanted me to come to Texas and get his apology. He could not
>>apologize to me directly, like a man, and say he was sorry for making a
>>racist remark. I give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he has
>>changed his position on this, since then. Inevitably, I will either prove
>>right or be told I am wrong, on this assumption.
>
>Word up, asshole -- I *know* I made my mistake, and I apologized to everyone
>else who might have been offended by it because they deserved that much.  
>You deserved it more than anyone else -- but thanks to your subsequent actions,
>such as being *so* offended by my phrase that you were BRAGGING about it
>in t.a, I take back my offer.  You don't get anything from me.  EVER.

PatricKKK Humphrey, complain and bitch all you want to, but observe
this 100% proven, basic and fundamental FACT as shown by the war that
you and I have fought on USENET: 

		Steve Chaney always beats Patrick Humphrey. 

I have always beat you, I have beaten you now, and I always will. In
every instance that you and I have fought, I have beaten you. I have
forced retractions after painful retractions out of you and have made
your efforts against me, backfire on you like nothing that too many
people have seen on this newsgroup before. Probably, that is. Worse
USENET beatings could have happened between other poster's. 

>Go fuck yourself with a chainsaw and follow it with a Drano enema, Chaney --
>because that'll do the human race more good than anything else you've done
>in your misbegotten life.

Why don't you swallow that running chainsaw and follow it up with
gasoline and a blowtorch? 

No, that's how your wife gives head... 

>>PatricKKK, I guarantee you, I won't be coming to Texas to see you and your
>>witnesses, unless I am coming with mine. And seeing as that we may be
>>walking into Klan territory, we will be loaded for bear. If I ever come to
>>say something to your face, PatricKKK, best believe I'll be prepped to
>>handle any violence on your part. In fact, I may be bringing a steam engine
>>to wage war against what turns out to be a walnut and not a real man.
>
>Go right ahead, putz.  You show up here, and I'll laugh in your face while
>I call the RUPD.  They don't like troublemakers, especially if they're not
>from Rice.  If by some chance you showed up at my residence, you'd be going
>downtown to enjoy the hospitality of HPD -- and they're none too fond of 
>out-of-towners, either.  A few months for you on the banks of Buffalo Bayou
>would do the rest of us a lot of good, I agree.

Show up at *your* residence? I don't dig that far underground,
PatricKKK. 

>(You're messing with a native of Bloody Harlan, Chaney.  I don't think you
>have the foggiest idea of what you're getting yourself into with your fat
>mouth running off like it is -- and I don't think you'd care much for it.
>I know *I* wouldn't.)

I know exactly what I'm getting into. 

There is no way that a buffoon like you could ever prevail over me in
any confrontation on the fact of this earth. 

You are simply too damned non-intelligent. 

>>THEN you said that in a racially diverse place like Houston, there is no
>>room for Klansmen and that everyone who knows you, knows you're not a
>>Klansmen. Well, PatricKKK, as I said before, how do YOU think an African
>>American in that racially diverse community, would react if you got mad and
>>referred to them as "your fat black ass," huh? What kind of mentality does
>>it take for someone to, while they're writing an article to talk.abortion,
>>not be able to catch something so blatantly RACIST, before they post it?
>
>Fuck you, Steve.  I guess you NEVER make mistakes?  I did, and I owned up to
>it, and that was that -- except for this one jackass in Sacramento who was *so*
>offended by it he was goddamn BRAGGING about it in this newsgroup!  Got any
>more lies to slander me with, Dennis?

NO. I never said I don't make mistakes. But no one has ever hounded me
more relentlessly than you. And no one has failed more miserably at
that mission, than you, who have failed so badly that you are better
off just leaving me the hell alone. 

At least I had the sense to take my winnings and cut my losses with
Jay Stein and leave that issue alone. But you? NooOOOooo... you went
on and on and on, until I got pissed and came back on the
counterattack. THEN you got scared and ran like hell, and then went
ballistic over diabetes and fetal experimentation, and challenged me
to come down there and say it to your face. 

Well, PatricKKK, I look forward to telling you to your face that I
will do whatever it takes and gather as many votes as it takes and
will stop you from ever being able to use, with government funds,
fetuses killed by doctors, or any newborns killed by their parents because
they're anencephalic, to fix your diabetes. As far as newborns go, I
will work to ensure that you never have the right to kill them under
any circumstances, funded or not funded, for your diabetes. And if I
get the chance, you will see your fetal transplant supply disappear
overnight, and you will have to resort to monkey fetal transplants or
drugs for your diabetes. 

And don't you dare scream or hollar because I'll laugh my ass off.
Anyone who seeks to heal themselves by taking another innocent human
life in the process, gets no sympathy from me. 

Got that? I thought so. Don't ever forget it, Humphrey, and rest
assured, I hope I get to repeat that in your face. 

Why don't you share with the rest of us what you'll do after that?

>>Oh, and that bit about "I said March your fat black ass down here and say
>>it to my face... but I didn't mean that as a racist phrase. Sorry" REALLY
>>blew over, huh?
>
>Yep, except for this professional agitator at CSUS who just couldn't handle
>*not* being the center of attention...

I didn't know you were at CSUS. Gee... 

>>PatricKKK, how does it feel to realize that I have beaten you constantly,
>>decisively, and embarrassingly, right and left, pillar to post, over and
>>over again, and to add insult to injury, captured your embarrassed face on
>>a pseudo-GIF, to boot?
>
>How should I know?  You've done none of those things in the slightest -- all
>you've done is libel me repeatedly, but that's about all you seem to know, so
>I suppose that's normal for you.

Hey, that so-called "libel" is backed up by facts, man. 

You're the one who has been caught in more lies than the distance in
sand grains between Earth and the Andromedan Galaxy, not me.  

>>At least Mark Kaufman has the sense to run and hide when I come calling,
>>but you? You rush like moths to the flame, to tackle me with some new b.s.
>
>All I have to do is sit back and watch you destroy yourself with your own
>bullshit -- and you're doing one bang-up job of it.  I notice that other
>pro-lifers seem to be awfully anxious to get as far away from you as 
>possible -- and I sure can't say I'd blame them for that...

Evidence, please, Patrick? Or is this one of your last-ditch
assertions to scare me off? 

>>Remember that "I have DOCUMENTATION that you posted as Dennis Hall" ? That
>>was the Mother of all Poker Games, Humphrey. You thought Roby was right and
>>that now, I was scared stiff as a board, and that I would crack and cry
>>out, "Okay, I was posting as Dennis Hall!" to avoid a further challenge
>>that would bring out "documentation" against me. Well, the fact was, I knew
>>what the facts were, unlike YOU, and I told you to show me that
>>documentation. You folded. No, let's translate that into pro-choice
>>propaganda - you told us that you... goofed... in using the word
>>"documentation." Actually, it was a phone call, you said.
>
>No one believes you, Steve.  But, if you want to keep pretending that it 
>happened that way because you say it did, be my guest.  Just don't whine
>too much when someone comes along and plants you in the street face-first,
>eh?  You're asking for it -- so don't be surprised if someone obliges you.
>(It obviously won't be me -- I have a few responsibilities, unlike bums
>like you.)

Someone planting me into the street face-first? That's a joke. The
first time it is ever attempted, I'll piledrive the bastard into the
mailbox and send his ass on his way to the police station. 

No, Patrick - the fact is, no one believes YOU. 

>>Yet another battle you lost against me, Humphrey.
>
>Yet another instance where you thought you were fighting a battle -- but no one
>else bothered to tell you there was nothing going on...

Patrick Humphrey makes 1000 + assertions about Steve Chaney
Steve Chaney refutes every one of them 
Patrick Humphrey makes 1000 + retractions. 

You're right. Somewhere long ago, you were so badly beaten in this war
that you started, that you gave up. 

Now when I come calling, it's no longer a war? Well, PatricKKK, when
it comes to you, it is always proper time to come calling for
long-owed debts. 

You have one hell of a debt to pay for all the b.s. you've pulled on
me, and right now, you're paying it through the nose. 

If your credibility was payment, it ceased to exist months ago. As it
is, your credibility doesn't exist. That's been proven. 

>>Well, PatricKKK Humphrey, I have DOCUMENTATION saying that you have an IQ
>>over 60, but can I prove that? Hardly. No hard evidence exists to prove
>>such a claim about you. Okay, okay, the documentation was a phone call. I
>>goofed in calling it 'documentation.'
>>But I DO have SOLID documentation of your racist remarks, Humphrey.
>
>No -- you have solid documentation of a remark I admit I made.  YOU say it's
>racist.  *I* say it's in extremely bad taste, and I've had more people agree
>with me than with your vituperative ravings -- now, why could that be, I 
>wonder?

More people agree with you? No, Patrick - people do not include
grasshoppers. 

The pro-lifers here obviously noticed what you did for what it was - a
statement that would have been RACIST if David Rasmussen had said it.

We just FORCE you to live by your own standards, and when you don't,
we bash you all over USENET and wipe the bandwidth with your ass. 

>>Quite obviously, PatricKKK, I am seriously superior to you, and am way
>>above your league. It is better for you and your pro-abort contingent that
>>you just leave me the hell alone, and just stick to the facts as well as
>>your feeble mind can comprehend them, because your lies sure as hell are
>>not blowing over. When you try to tackle me, you're pissing into the wind,
>>or so your loss-filled track record clearly shows. In my case, it's not a
>>wind, but a tornado: you'll not only get it back in your face, but you'll
>>get swept into the sky and dumped unceremoniously on your ass, on the cold,
>>hard Texas USENET.concrete.
>
>Nice fantasy you have there, Steve.  I hope you get to go through what my
>wife has gone through the past week at Hermann Hospital, because even such a
>piece of human refuse as yourself *might* learn something from the experience.
>Right now, I'm worried about her -- and I know I'd feel a LOT better if
>you were in her place and she was well again.  You're useless to just about
>everyone.  At least my wife has something besides hatred, bigotry, racism,
>greed, arrogance -- all those qualities you seem to eager to bash the rest of
>us with -- to offer our neighbors.

Well, you obviously supply part of what she's missing - hatred,
bigotry and racism, not to mention arrogance. 

Oh, yeah, I'm arrogant. When it came to light that I am probably
three hundred thousand evolutionary years ahead of you, it made me
extremely arrogant. 

The problem is, 99% of the human race is three hundred thousand
evolutionary years ahead of you. 

So I have no reason to be arrogant. Oh well. 


And tell your wife I said happy sex change. And seeing as that you
wish I were in your wife's place, why don't I add that I hope your
wife's surgery gets seriously BOTCHED.  

You and your wife have no use in this entire world, and to add insult
to injury, pal, I hope your next insulin shot is tainted. That'll be
the last we hear of you, thank goodness and good riddings. 

Get the point, PatricKKK? TWO CAN PLAY AT THAT GAME. 

>>Someone can bash my ego in this post, because it does look quite inflated
>>compared to your null self-esteem after reading this. But no one can
>>challenge the facts: I've beaten you in each and every single battle that
>>we have had. I have embarrassed you worse than I have embarrassed anyone
>>else; and I have caught you more blatantly than I caught Mark Kaufman, and
>>that's HARD to do, because his fuck-ups are pretty wide-open.
>
>Of course, it's interesting that no one else seems to pay much mind to your
>"facts", mainly because they're your opinions.  I guess they don't teach 
>you that in the Land of the Fruit and the Nut, though...

No one has ever paid much attention to you, PatricKKK. Ever think of
the possibility that your wife wants outa this world because she
fucked up and married you? 

>>Never forget, Humphrey, that I do prefer peace. But when the flamewar is
>>going, I pack THE most power and punch, and you have learned up-front just
>>how fierce and relentless I am. Say what you will about my flames; I am
>>accurate, and I get the job done.
>
>This is the funniest thing I've seen you post in a long time -- and it's
>up to your rigorous standards for accuracy -- 0%.

So that's why you're making all the retractions and I'm the one
pounding them out of you, one at a time? 

By the standards of who's being forced to back down, I'm batting 1000,
and you're batting -1000. Gee, negative figures ain't possible in
batting averages, but leave it to PatricKKK to make it possible. 

>>And don't bother me with your complaints about me kicking a little
>>dirt into your face, Humphrey. 
>
>Are you kidding?  Only you would try to kick dirt in my face and not notice
>you're standing on Astroturf...

That's no problem. I'm standing on Astroturf with your face under my
feet. 

>>I find it more fun getting onto talk.abortion so I can kick your FACE 
>>into the DIRT.  
>
>No kidding?  When do you think you'll ever get up the miniscule amount of
>courage needed to start?  I want to see that if it ever happens...

What? Are you THAT numb already? 


=============================================================================
                   /\
                  /  \
                 /    \
                /      \ 
               /  KKK   \ 
              /          \ 
             / ---   ---  \
            /  [ ]   [ ]   \ 
           /                \ 
          /                  \
         /      --------      \  
        /       |      |       \ 
       /        --------        \ 
      /                          \ 
     /                            \ 
/--------------------------------------\ 
|      |Come on, Steve.  Let's  |      | 
|      |see just how much of a  |      | 
|      |boy you are.  March     |      | 
|      |your fat black ass down |      | 
|      |here and tell me I'm a  |      | 
|      |liar, to my face.       |      | 
|      |  - PatricKKK Humphrey  |      | 

=============================================================================
|Pro-Contraception   Pro-Freedom of Religion, Speech & Sexual Orientation   |
|Pro-Privacy    Pro-Humanism   Pro-Freedom of Choice 	Registered Democrat | 
|			Card-carrying member, NRLC                          |
|           Dedicated to achieving civil rights for the unborn              |
-----Steve Chaney: Founder, Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.0-------
	       The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS. 

Newsgroups: talk.abortion