From: li@sicvax.enet.dec.com (Tom Li)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Is TI so rossy?
Date: 21 Jan 93 01:59:53 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


In article <C16EIE.2qs@ulowell.ulowell.edu>, cshi@cs.ulowell.edu (Chunde Shi) writes...
>
>From my understanding of mainland's postion, Taiwan can keep independent
>military, political and economical system as she  likes.  She dos not need
>to do more than she please in any issue involved interaction between 
>Taiwan and Mainland. 

ROC/Taiwan has already had these for 43 years, and has more than CCP is 
offering. CCP should make a better offer. Only a fool will take this offer,
will you?

>Taiwan recognize Mainland government as sole government of China, Taiwan is 
>part of China.

Then CCP government is the central government of Taiwan. You must be kidding.
Even her legitimacy is in question. CCP government is not elected by people
but gain the powers via civil war. So embarrassed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How about the Mainland recognize Taiwan government as sole government of 
China, Taiwan and the Mainland are all part of China, ie, CCP step down, 
let united government under KMT and DPP to manage China for 5 years. Then 
a general election will come after. Or "Two China", "One Nation, two equal
political entity" can be also good choice.

>As to wich system is more desirable, I started to think mainland may be in the
>way of finding a better system which is better suitable and more competitive
>than any sytem we know before, capitallism, socialism, communism,
>Confucianism, Three People Principle, what ever. I do believe Mainland deserve
>to have a chance to carry the experiment out, given sustained double growth
>rate. As to Taiwan's system, you have to filter out the factor that
>U.S. provided massive aid and more importantly market, to be able to
               ^^^^^^^^^^^
>objectively talking about so called "Taiwan experience". 

Total US$1.5b from 50s - 60s. Soviet also provided the aid to China. Why this
anything to do with unification? Or just make you feel better.

>Mao had not been in any foreign school, Deng was educated 
>in French. 

Or college, that is why Mao did not know how to manage the nation and brought
so many political movements. Feudalism occupied his brain.

>I would not worry about "Culture difference". I worry about future generations
>in Taiwan do not possess teh attachment to mainland, as did by those moved to
>Taiwan 40 years ago.

I dont see too much difference in the culture but in mentality. You are a good
example. sorry.

>I agree, but that is only "soft" mechanism. Some kind of agrement may
>nail it down and make it impossible for TI and can argument more forcefully
>against any nations attemp to split China.

As I always said, if you want TI die down, CCP should recognize Taiwan 
as a political entity until two sides narrow the gap.

>Please do not join the West crowds, pretending to be the spokesman of Chinese
>people. Chinese leadership are more aware what is going on than outsiders
>think. I used to read CCP's internal publication, it was compiled from 
>West raw publications without editing.
>There was a poll month ago, 60% of  Chinese are satisfied economically,
>50% politically. I do not know how poll was conducted, how the question
>was phrased. But it did give some hint on Mainlanders's public opinion.

And you believe it. CCP always say "Wolf is coming, wolf is coming" there 
is no wolf the wolf is CCP. CCP just want distract your attention about
what CCP has been doing? I know you "read" a lot but can you think a bit?
Sigh!
Newsgroups: soc.culture.taiwan