HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mhammond@bnr.ca (Mike Hammond)
Subject: QL query (and Re: Personal to Vidiot) 
Reply-To: mhammond@bnr.ca
Organization: BNR Ottawa, Fibre Systems Development
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 92 19:53:58 GMT

In article <BvI2Mt.Dwu@inews.Intel.COM>, sramirez@hopi.intel.com (Steve Ramirez) writes:
|> Mike,
   ^^^^
|> 
|> Re: the QL tape
|> 
|> My mail to you is bouncing, please send me your address and
|> the cost for a hi-fi VHS tape and my roomate will you send 
|> you a self-addreses stamped mailer and a check.
|> 
|> thanks
|> Steve
  
Mike who? If you're referring to me, then I wasn't very clear a week and
a half ago. (God, was it that long ago? :-) *I* asked for a copy of ``Lee
Harvey Oswald'', but I've already been able to borrow one. I don't have
one, and thus can't sell one to you. If I'm not the Mike you're referring
to, then please disregard this message.

Just so you don't think that I'm using rec.arts.tv as my own personal 
mailing service, I have a question to pose concerning next week's 
Quantum Leap, where Sam seems to have leaped into the body of a double
amputee. (No spoilers for that episode, that's basically all I know. But
I am going to compare it to ``Blind Faith'' and ``The Wrong Stuff'', so here are some spoilers.


























































































Good enough? :-) In ``Blind Faith'', Sam leaped into the body of a blind
pianist, but he could still see. In ``The Wrong Stuff'', he was able to swim, even though chimps can't. Presumably, that means that although he's
leaped into the body of a double amputee, he can still walk.

My question is, if he tried to walk (or stand for that matter), what would
people around him see? 

By the way, please don't try to e-mail me between September and December
1992, because I won't receive it. Please post any responses instead.
Thanx. (However, feel free to e-mail any flames! :-) :-)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|      Mike Hammond      | ``Yes, I'm...too wascally for Bugs Bunny,  |
|     BNR Ottawa, and    |   Too wascally for Bugs Bunny,             |
| Co-op Student from the |   So wascally...it's almost funny!''       |
| University of Waterloo |                        Right Said Fudd,    |
|      Math Faculty      |                      ``I'm Too Wascally''  |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: scholl@uvmark.uucp (Kathryn Scholl)
Subject: Re: SNL quality
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 13:35:12 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.

 
 In article walkerjo@cgsvax.claremont.edu writes:
 >
 >Since he returned to SNL, Lorne has
 >been absolutely dominating it; he even appears on the show most weeks.

Well, I thought that Lorne's appearance this week was amusing, especially
his comment about (paraphrased) "Oh no, the worst guest we had was
Steven Segal." (sp)

Segal must have been as big a bomb internally on the set as he appeared
on the show.
-- 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 Kathryn Scholl  -- Above text reflects opinions of the author, not VMark --
 Vmark Software, Inc., 30 Speen Street, Framingham, MA  01701, USA
 Internet: uvmark!scholl@merk.com, UUCP: uunet!merk.com!uvmark!scholl
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: staffan@ca.serum.kodak.com (Kenneth Staffan (x37507))
Subject: Remington Steele?
Organization: Clinical Products Division, Eastman Kodak Company
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 19:11:52 GMT

Has anyone heard any rumors about any station planning to show Remington
Steele again?  The Family Channel was running it in syndication a few
years ago, although they were pretty heavily cut...

Ken
---
staffan@serum.kodak.com
From: EDIAS@deimos.ucc.umass.edu (EMILIANO A DIAS)
Subject: Re: Animation Festival
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 18:24:22 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20

In <1992Sep30.080631.14063@hemlock.cray.com> jeffy@cray.com writes:

> So I'm at Spike and Mike's Sick and Twisted Animation Festival and I saw a lot
> of neat things.  Can anybody add to/elaborate on/say more about/give a history
> of any of the following:
> 
> 	- An old Flintstones commercial for Winston cigarettes
>           (Barney and Fred are behind the house smoking...)
> 
> 	- Inbred Fred's cartoons.  (Beavus and Butthead series)
> 
> 	- Dog Pile
> 

What about the Porky Pig short?  It was show right before (or right after
the Flinstones' cigarette commercial.

Porky is stuttering, "Son of a, Son of a, Son of a.." and then he finally
says "Son of a Gun,  I bet you thought I was gonna say, "Son of a Bitch"."

That was great...				Tony Dias

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: feldman@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Todd J. Feldman)
Subject: Mr. Bean  / The New Statesman
Originator: feldman@Xenon.Stanford.EDU
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 19:00:14 GMT


Can anyone tell me how many series there have been of "Mr. Bean" - I know
there was at least one with 6 episodes in it; has there been another?

Also, does anyone know if and when these will be repeated on HBO, along with
the Rowan Atkinson comedy special?

Lastly, does anyone know how many series of "The New Statesman" there have
been, including the new one being (or about to be) shown in England?

Thanks VERY much!

Todd
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: cass@netcom.com (Diana Tenery-Fisher)
Subject: Re: SNL: Where was Mike Myers?
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 15:52:03 GMT

 Well.... I dont know if this is the reason or not... but Myers is
filming a movie in San francisco (or at least he was as recently
as 2 weeks ago).... so that could be why he wasnt there.

-diana

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
diana tenery-fisher               'It is only with the heart that one can see
cass@netcom.com                    rightly. What is essential is invisible
                                   to the eye'  -  The Little Prince
 
Soundtrack >  these thoughts were had solely under the influence of 
  du jour  >             Narada Sampler 2 - Lotus Artists
From: shadow@r-node.gts.org (Jay Chu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: You Bet Your Life
Date: 2 Oct 92 21:27:30 GMT
Organization: R-node Public Access UNIX Information System (416-249-5366)

In article <1aal05INNk2h@early-bird.think.com> barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin) writes:
>>After watching a recent episode of "YBYL", as the credits rolled by, I saw
>>"Robbi Chong" as "Renfield."  Why do they need to use an alias for the co-host
>>of a game show??  Why do they call her "Renfield" and not her real name?
>>Just curious!!!
>
>I don't know, but I think the original YBYL also did this with Groucho's
>sidekick.  So maybe it's just part of the resurrection, which requires that
>they copy everything.

What's this game show about?  I don't understand it.  (Well, I never had
a chance to watch the whole thing, have to work night shift.)

Who can explain to me what this game show is about?  E-mail...
-- 
        ______                shadow@r-node.gts.org
       | |__| |   If it's there and you can see it       - it's real
       |  ()  |   If it's there and you can't see it     - it's transparent
       |______|   If it's not there and you can't see it - you erased it!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: me@naranja-next.Stanford.EDU (My Account)
Subject: Re: NEXP (9/28) - Maggie laughs?
Organization: DSO, Stanford University
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 17:24:30 GMT

In article <BvEAnM.5GJ@cs.dal.ca> falkenha@ug.cs.dal.ca (Craig R.  
Falkenham) writes:
> I had to have this pointed out to me by a friend, but Maggie said that  
all
> of her old boyfriends made her laugh.  And in the final scene in the  
hospital,
> Joel told her about the helicopters and made her laugh.


At the end of the episode "The Bumpy Road to Love," (where Eve kidnaps  
Joel and Maggie finds out Rick had a lot of 'other women') Maggie kinda  
tells Joel that he makes her laugh.
From: ss@wpi.WPI.EDU (Scott Streeter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: *** Episodes of "T. J. Hooker", "C.H.i.P's" wanted, will pay $$$ ***
Date: 28 Sep 92 00:32:55 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609-2280
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu
In-reply-to: hfir_cif@uhura.cc.rochester.edu's message of 28 Sep 92 00:17:44 GMT

>>>>> On 28 Sep 92 00:17:44 GMT, hfir_cif@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Hoss 'insular' Firooznia) said:

hfir_cif> I am in desperate need of episodes of "T. J. Hooker" and/or
hfir_cif> "C.H.i.P's", but unfortunately my local TV stations aren't
hfir_cif> wise enough to know what amazingly awesome shows these were.
hfir_cif> Is there anyone out there who has copies on tape, or access
hfir_cif> to a station airing episodes, who would be willing to make
hfir_cif> copies for me?  I'm willing to pay for the tapes, shipping
hfir_cif> costs, and perhaps an additional fee for taping. :-)

This is a joke right?
--
                        Scott Streeter
                        ss@wpi.wpi.edu
From: garvey@skybridge.SCL.CWRU.Edu (Heather Garvey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: SNL: October 3, Really Bad.
Date: 5 Oct 1992 19:35:01 GMT
Organization: Smith Undergrad Lab, CWRU, Cleve. OH
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: marina.scl.cwru.edu
X-Post-Machine: marina.scl.cwru.edu

kickstart@vax1.mankato.msus.edu writes:
>
>Okay, but you cannot tell me you didn't laugh during "Tori".  (I hate Shannon
>Dougherty!)

	I laughed at the jokes but was completely annoyed by the "I Only
Have One Character" girl who was Tori. It ruined the otherwise cute jokes.
She can only make the "Tuck My Chin Under, Squinch Up My Face, Make
My Lips Into An Hourglass" face. Which is hardly a parody of Tori Spelling.
In fact, it's pretty grotestque. I think they should dump her and bring
back Victoria Jackson. Or anyone, really.

--
	" ...dealing with Free-Net makes me very angry  | Heather "Moose"
and gives me thoughts of breaking things and torturing  | Garvey, Biochem 93'
small animals. "   --  Bruce Ikenaga <bxi@po.cwru.edu>  | <hlg@po.cwru.edu>
From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Sci-Fi Channel-- Anyone got it yet?
Date: 29 Sep 1992 06:28:19 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: gandalf.think.com


I was visiting my mother this weekend, and her cable company (Huntington
Cablevision on Long Island, NY) is showing a preview of the Sci-Fi Channel
this week (on the channel that normally runs the program guide).

Personally, I wasn't impressed.  It was kind of neat being there for the
first weekend, since I got to see the pilot episodes of some old series
(e.g. Time Tunnel).  But other than that, I don't expect that I would watch
a whole lot of it.  It's mostly reruns of series that have been rerun a
zillion times in syndication (e.g. "Lost in Space", "Voyage to the Bottom
of the Sea"); since I haven't watched them there, I don't see why I would
want an entire channel wasted on them.  Admittedly, they've resurrected
some series that haven't been shown so much ("Time Tunnel", "Dark
Shadows"), but I don't think it's enough.  Imagine if Nickelodeon ran their
"Nick at Night" lineup 24 hours a day.

The few non-fiction series also didn't seem very impressive.

Their original movies will eventually be released to other channels
(probably USA first), and I can wait.
-- 
Barry Margolin
System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com          {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: gavin@tiger1.prime.com (Dave Gavin)
Subject: Re: Jan Hooks (was Re: SNL:  Where was Mike Myers?)
Organization: Prime Computer, Inc.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 17:30:29 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.190304.26034@mercury.cair.du.edu>, kguinn@zephyr.cair.du.edu (Kip J. Guinn) writes:
> In article <1992Oct3.183835.2794@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> smmcafee@mtu.edu (Sean McAfee) writes:
> >In article <BvFAEz.M0t@ddsw1.mcs.com> dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (DWT) writes:
> >>His name is Adam Sandler, and though some other rec.arts.tv readers like the
> >>characters, I wish he'd stick Opera Man and Cajun Man into a trunk.
> >
> >A friend of mine told me that he saw Adam Sandler on the Dennis Miller
> >show.  According to said friend, Sandler talked about a new character he was
> >working on called "Whoopee Man" whose gimmick was that he responded to all
> >questions with a quiet "whoopee!"  As you might imagine, my friend said that
> >WM was resoundingly unfunny.
> 
> 
> The thing that strikes me about Sandler's characters is:  yes, on the
> surface, they are incredibly stupid.  I mean, come on--Opera Man?
> Cajun Man?  whose big thing is every answer is a word ending in a
> "shun" sound (depression, consession, etc...)
> 
> But then you see him do the characters, and (I may be alone here, but)
> they really come off!  I find myself laughing most of the way through
> them.
> 
> He's not a comic genius, but you have to admit--he's got guts to go
> on national TV with that... :-)
> 
> Kip

anybody remember Adam Sandler on MTV's Remote Control....Stickpin Quinn
a classic character on a classic game show
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: dyrda@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (The Conservative)
Subject: Re: democrats
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 19:07:08 GMT

>In article <16874BDB7.TKOZMA@cms.cc.wayne.edu> TKOZMA@cms.cc.wayne.edu writes:
>>=-=-=-=-= JFK, LBJ, McGovern, Carter, Mondale, Dukakis, Clinton =-=-=-=-=
>What's wrong with the above series???

 Well maybe this will help..

 giggalo, slickster, peace man!!, duhhh!!, why me??, tanker, slickester2
 JFK      LBJ        McGovern     Carter   Mondale   Dukakis Clinton
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Richard Dyrda                    | "I thought this was an elephant  
Idaho National Engr. Laboratory  |  race, but I hear some jack-asses out 
c/o School of Nuclear Engineering|  there!!!" 
    Purdue University            |              Donald Regan  
(208) 526-4050                   |  Pres.Reagan's COS at Repub Fund Party 
=-=-=-=-= JFK, LBJ, McGovern, Carter, Mondale, Dukakis, Clinton =-=-=-=-=
                   Don't the Democrats ever learn??
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.sf.tv
From: sallylb@netcom.com (Sally Smith)
Subject: QL: Evil leaper misconception
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 20:59:09 GMT

Everyone seems to be assuming that the 'evil leaper' concept is a
leftover or continuation of The Halloween Episode, when in fact the
_reverse_ is true.

I have here on tape an interview with Chris Ruppenthal from September
14, 1990 (I had a cheeseburger; Chris had chicken and fettucine) in
which he says:

"I had an idea that I spoke to Deborah Pratt about, which was, Sam
would fight some guy who ultimately would get away at the end, who
would be some bad guy, and we thought, 'Oh, we'll never be able to do
that, we won't be able to do that till season four.' [....] It was a
topic and a style that I didn't expect to be done till much later in
the series, and it wound up that we started talking about it at a
story meeting one day and it evolved into the Halloween show."

In other words, the Halloween ep was an early spin-off of this
recurring archenemy idea that they had earlier and were planning on
saving for later.

Just thought I'd set the record straight.

Sally
-- 
Sally Smith (510)790-0608  sallylb@netcom.com (I was sally@tardis.tymnet.com)
I'm unemployed--these opinions *must* be mine!
"Don't investigate this too closely." -- Don Bellisario, re: "Quantum Leap"
From: lightnin@bernoulli.WPI.EDU (Paraaaaaaaaade of Shoooooooooes)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: SNL: October 3, Really Bad.
Date: 4 Oct 92 22:22:14 GMT
Organization: DeityCo: Major and Minor Deities Placement Agency
NNTP-Posting-Host: bernoulli.wpi.edu
In-reply-to: EDIAS@deimos.ucc.umass.edu's message of Sun, 4 Oct 1992 08:19:02 GMT

>>>>> On Sun, 4 Oct 1992 08:19:02 GMT, EDIAS@deimos.ucc.umass.edu (EMILIANO A DIAS) said:

EDIAS> In <1992Oct4.044927.10855@afterlife.ncsc.mil>
EDIAS> acadams@afterlife.ncsc.mil writes:

EDIAS>> Is it just me, or was the October 3 Saturday Night Live really,
EDIAS>> really boring?
EDIAS>> 
EDIAS>> I mean, there was not one entertaining sketch in the entire 1 1/2 hours

EDIAS> nope it wasn't you, it was the show it really bit!!!

EDIAS> The show looked like it was put together in two hours, nothing
EDIAS> was funny, everyone kept stumbling over their lines.

EDIAS> The only highlight (or at least the highest lowlight) was
EDIAS> "Cooking" with Dennis Miller.  It wasn't a very funny skit but
EDIAS> Dana Carvey does an excellent Dennis Miller.

EDIAS> two shows so far and both have sucked...		Tony Dias

Not only that, but what jokes were in there (I use the term jokes loosely,
at least, I assume that's what they were supposed to be) seemed to be 
extremely petty and bitter.  The skits weren't so much comedy, as they were
personal attacks on whoever they were about.

The "Cooking with Dennis Miller" sketch I thought was the worst.  It might
have been ok, if it was actually Dennis Miller in a guest appearance, but
as it was, it seemed like the crew was saying, "You left, and then your
show got cancelled, Neener."

The only "funny" moment was in the Update during James Spade's Hollywood
report.  After being generally rude and insulting to all the stars, they 
flash up a picture of James's picture, and he says "burning bridges."

Sad to say, but American Gladiators (which is on after SNL in our area) was
more entertaining, even without the MST3K treatment we usually give it.

-lightnin

Derek G Bacon        | "But his bosses didn't like him, so they shot him into 
lightnin@wpi.wpi.edu |  space."     - MST3K Love Theme
Gadaiyio Takeimienei |=========================================================
Writer of USFP       | "Oh Fluffy, I never knew." -Earth Girls Are Easy
From: mary@wam.umd.edu (Mary Louise Cassidy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What is the deal with that ANNOYING kid in the Britannica commercials?
Date: 1 Oct 92 07:04:49 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

Actually..I think the new puter is an Amiga 2000...???
From: geoffb@coos.dartmouth.edu (Geoff Bronner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: alt groups, newsgroups
Date: 29 Sep 92 20:20:59 GMT
Article-I.D.: dartvax.1992Sep29.202059.19989
Reply-To: geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU
Organization: Amos Tuck School

In <9209252109.AA01933@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> APUCORLE@IDBSU.IDBSU.EDU writes:

>Well, if everyone moves their discussion of Northern
>Exposure to alt.tv.nexp, and any discussion of Quantum
>Leap to alt.tv.quantum-leap, and then they cross-post
>to rec.arts.tv, what the heck is the point of having
>a separate group???  Why don't we all just have one
>big TV group?  Kill files can be used accordingly.

The standard responses to this are:

1. Many people do not have the ability to use kill files.
2. Many sites do not receive alt.* groups (and some get alt.* groups but
   don't get rec.* groups...).
3. One big group has too much volume for some users to keep up with.

Since I use nn I don't really care. I can kill and select articles at will
so the volume does not bother me. alt.* groups and crossposting are
irrelevant. If specialized alt.* groups make some people's lives easier
then so be it. I can read the crossposted traffic in rec.arts.tv and
everyone is happy (NOT!). Of course, in some cases, like with QL, I don't
read the alt.* group and I kill all the related traffic in rec.arts.tv,
but I digress.

A reorganization of rec.arts.tv has been discussed in the past but nothing
has ever become of it. No one could really agree on a format.

-Geoff
--
geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU - Computing Support Consultant, Tuck School of Business

    If crimefighters fight crime, and firefighters fight fire,
    what do freedomfighters fight?	- George Carlin
From: detrolio@andromeda.rutgers.edu (David De Trolio)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Designing Women: new season comments
Date: 4 Oct 92 04:49:48 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

I only have seen the season opener, but I am glad to see Julia
Duffy and her horrible character off the show.  I think the new
character and the expansion of Jan Hooks will round out what is a
very good cast.

I gave up on the show last year after a few episodes with Duffy,
she almost brought down the show.

There is no need to keep comparing everyone new to the show to
Delta Burke.  She is not very good, was not very funny, and her 
character in my book comes in a close second to Julia Duffy.  I
for one did not care in the least when she was fired.


-- 
---------------------------------
     David De Trolio
---------------------------------
(detrolio@andromeda.rutgers.edu)
From: Gordon_Wong@mindlink.bc.ca (Gordon Wong)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: LIFE GOES ON (10/04)
Date: 5 Oct 92 03:59:04 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: world

Some comments regarding the season opener to LIFE GOES ON (10/04):

[1] Interesting and informative show ... I like the way they interspersed
    comments from real-life Down's Syndrome children within the regular parts
    of the show. Although they may be different in one way, they share the
    same dreams and passions as normal children.

[2] I really dislike the Harris character ... he reminisces about the past
    on and on. I would be more interested in what his life away from the
    bookstore is like.

[3] I like the part where Goodman was being chummy with Corky ... she had her
    arm around Corky. Amanda got jealous and flicked her arm off with great
    force.

[4] In the credits, I believe that two actors (brothers) play Nick. The
"Nick"
    that was there last week seemed older.

[5] I am serving crunchy macaroni and cheese tonight ... shall a set a plate
    for you? :)

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams)
Subject: Re: _Herman's Head_ new intro
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 04:45:57 GMT

joe.siegler@satalink.com (Joe Siegler) writes:
 >It doesn't convey effectively the concept of the people inside 
 >Herman's Head.  

I got the impression that it was made to better showcase the cast.
Unlike the old one, everybody gets both their name and face on the 
screen and the same time.

 >The old show did, but, IMHO, there's no way of really doing it 
 >short of saying "Hey, these people are inside Herman's Head".

I felt the original credits did that about as well as you can.

 >It's one of my favorite shows.

Yea, I like it a lot as well.
From: acadams@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Arthur C. Adams)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: SNL: October 3, Really Bad.
Date: 4 Oct 92 04:49:27 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: St. Swithin's School for the Exceptionally Gifted

Is it just me, or was the October 3 Saturday Night Live 
really, really boring?

I mean, there was not one entertaining sketch in the entire 1 1/2 hours.

Tim Robbins' Monologue: Didn't last week's host also get lectures
	by Lorne? It wasn't funny anyway, and doing the same
	joke tow weeks in a row is bad.
Weekend Update - dull.
The pizza commercial - stupid.
Deep Thoughts: not funny.
The Bob Roberts sketch: Dumb, and what was the point of Kevin Nealon's
	remarks at the end?
World's Nicest Pimp: bad. 
-- 
What the gamemasters wilt shall be the whole of the law.
	- Motto of the Hellfire Club, live-action roleplaying GM's
We need not fear those who do evil in the name of evil, but Heaven
protect us from those who do evil in the name of good.