HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D. Oliver III)
Subject: Re: Suns file protest in San Antonio loss
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
	<93006.140938U47526@uicvm.uic.edu>
	<1993Jan8.180809.652@cbnewsc.cb.att.com> <edm.726539927@wrs.com>
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 08:39:23 GMT

In article <edm.726539927@wrs.com> edm@wrs.com (Ed McClannahan) wrote:
> Has anybody mentioned the Laker game some EIGHT (8) years ago when Magic
> intentionally missed a free throw with little time on the clock and the
> Lakers down (by ONE, I think).  

Actually, it was Norm Nixon against the Spurs and what happened was this:
Nixon double-clutched his free-throw shot, drawing the Spurs into a lane
violation.  The double-clutching is a violation and should have resulted in
the free-throw being discounted and the Spurs given the ball.  The original
result was a Lakers' win in regulation, but with the upheld appeal they
replayed the last few seconds, and the game went into overtime, which the
Spurs won.
____________________________
	Jim Oliver  
	oliver@athena.mit.edu /	joliver@hstbme.mit.edu
	oliver%mitwccf.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Re: Wolves Fire Rodgers
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 01:48:58 GMT

>> did not hear who would be replacing him.  Anybody know?
>Yep, it's Sidney Lowe.  

But only on an interim basis, I understand.

I would expect McCloskey to bring in Dick Versace.  They go back
together to the good old days in Detroit, and the story is that V and
Chuck Person got along well in Indiana.

(Probably, neither one of them ever stopped talking long enough to
hear what the other was saying.)


--Gidi
From: u_nique@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Jerray Wei)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Grant & Pippen on Michael
Date: 7 Jan 1993 01:39:04 -0500
Organization: Homewood Academic Computing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md, USA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu

A while ago, there was a thread on how Horace Grant and Scottie Pippen's
arrival in Chicago helped Michael Jordan's shooting % sky up from 48% to 
nearly 54% the next year, etc.

I argued against it, saying that Jordan improved his jump shot tremendously
so he didn't have to hurl himself at the basket every single play of the game,
but whoever it was, said that it was definitely Grant and Pippen's offensive
presence.  Since they could score, Michael was freed up.

Well, in '87-'88, Jordan probably had his best individual year, and it was
also the year when Grant and Pippen were drafted, which is where what's his
face gets his argument from.  But...it seems if I look closer, both of these
guys were on the bench.  Brad Sellers and Charles Oakley were still there,
and for the entire season at that.  Pippen scored 7.9 ppg on 46% shooting
and Grant scored 7.7.  Huh...almost any bench player in the NBA (ie. how
about 8th man) could record these numbers.  Both of them combined barely
played the # of minutes that Michael did, so they weren't even on the court
with him half the time, and probably not during crunch time.

Conclusion?  Michael did it himself.  That was the first time I'd ever seen
him have a consistent 18 footer and it carried him to the MVP.
From: oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D. Oliver III)
Subject: Re: A Couple of Questions
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 07:53:24 GMT

In article <1993Jan8.180724.20206@mprgate.mpr.ca> levesque@galaxy.mpr.ca (Steve Levesque) wrote:
> 1) When a shot is blocked, does it count as a Field Goal Attempt?

Yes.  And whoever picks it up get a rebound.

> 2) When a player misses a shot and is called for a charge, is it a FGA.

No, but it is a turnover.

> 3) Do blocked shots and steals count as turnovers. If not, what does
> constitute a turnover.

Blocked shots are FGA, not turnovers.  Steals are turnovers.  Throwing the
ball out of bounds, traveling, 24-, 10-, and 3-second violations, double
dribbles, etc. are all turnovers. 

> 4) Can goaltending be called on a missed Free Throw Attempt.

From: cliu@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (chang hsu liu):

>1) Does tipin count as one rebound too? If it doesn't go in,
>and the player tip 3 times more to get it in, will it be counted
>as three more rebounds?

Yes to both.

>2) How does people count the assist? If the guard passed a beautiful
>ball to the center but the center didn't make it, wil it be counted
>as one assist. I gues no. How about the situation that the same 
>center get fouled and he make both? What if he make none? Will it
>still count as no assist? It's not fair to me if count as none. 
>What if he make just one instead of two?

An assist can only be given for a made field goal attempt.  I don't have
the exact wording, but the general idea is that the shot must be taken as a
continuation of the pass, i.e., if someone dribbles around or makes a bunch
of head fakes before scoring, you don't get an assist.
____________________________
	Jim Oliver  
	oliver@athena.mit.edu /	joliver@hstbme.mit.edu
	oliver%mitwccf.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: byau@jarthur.claremont.edu (Ben Yau)
Subject: Re: Slam Dunk Contestants
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 22:42:56 GMT

In article <43338@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> cs163wav@sdcc8.ucsd.edu (Anthony Minkoff) writes:
>
>I have a vague recollection (can somebody confirm this?) of hearing
>that no team can be represented by more than one player in the slam
>dunk contest.  Thus, Ceballos and Dumas could not both be in the
>contest (barring trades).  (Being that Ceballos is the defending
>champion and wants to defend his title, that would mean that Dumas
>would be outta luck.)

Well, let's see.  If I remember correctly, 
1986: Webb and Nique were in it (Hawks), Webb won
1987: Kersey and Drexler were in it (Blazers). Kersey lost in the finals
	to Jordan
1988: Wilkins, Webb (hawks) competed... as well as Kersey, Drexler(
	Blazers), Webb missed two dunkcs and I think got a total score
	of 32 for the first round.  Kersey finished third to last.
	Drexler and Nique went to the semi-fninals (along with Jordan and
	Otis Smith).  and Jordan beat Nique in the finals.

so I don't see why two Suns couldn't be in it.

>My picks would be: Benoit Benjamin, Stanley Roberts, Kevin
>Duckworth, Oliver Miller, Muggsy Bogues, Spud Webb, Greg Grant, and
>Michael Adams.  Wouldn't this be fun to watch?  :^)

can we add Mark Eaton and Manute Bol?  :)
I hope you added Benjamin just because he is the one out of all of them 
that is most likely to blow all of his dunks?

:)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Yau		    byau@jarthur.claremont.edu	          SHHHTEENKEE FOO FOO
        -----------------------------------------
From: robert@aero.org (R. S. Statsinger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Re : IN MEMORIAM : Johny Most
Date: 6 Jan 1993 01:19:11 GMT
Organization: Your Guess Is As Good As Mine...
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: halcyon.aero.org

In article <43077@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> kompella@cs.ucsd.edu (Vachaspathi Kompella) writes:
>
> [voice of reason omitted]
>

Vach -

You are of course correct. The ignorant little fuck is in my killfile
now, I've holstered my flamethrower, gonna study war no more.....

			R.S.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: ecaxron@venus.lerc.nasa.gov (Ron Graham)
Subject: Re: All-Star Voting Summary
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Distribution: usa
Date: 11 Jan 1993 15:12 EDT  

In article <1993Jan11.174941.17824@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>, 
     ortcm@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (thomas.mcguigan) writes...

>East				West
>Centers
>Shaquille O'Neal  116407	David Robinson	 118736
>Patrick Ewing	    73112	Hakeem Olajuwon	  42742
>Bill Cartwright    28922 *	Kevin Duckworth	  39856
>Brad Daugherty	    28062 *	Dikembe Mutombo	  39656

The asterisks indicate yet another reason to take away the All-Star
balloting from the fans.  Daugherty ought to be up there with the big 
names, Invisi-Bill down with the noise.

RG

"I mean, here's a guy with no clue whatsoever - and look what he's doing!
 Just think what he'll be like when he figures out what's going on!"
 -  Steve Kerr, on Shaquille O'Neal
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: rajesh@longhair.cs.unlv.edu (Rajesh Viswanathan)
Subject: Re: Hot Rod Williams
Reply-To: rajesh@longhair.cs.unlv.edu (Rajesh Viswanathan)
Organization: UNLV Computer Science and Electrical Engineering
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 19:12:23 GMT

In article <C0pBCL.72n@cs.uiuc.edu>, huang@cs.uiuc.edu (Linus Huang) writes:
) From: huang@cs.uiuc.edu (Linus Huang)
) Subject: Hot Rod Williams
) Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 10:00:20 PST
) 
) 
) I notice Williams has not appeared in any Cavs box scores lately.  Does
) anyone know what malady, physical or otherwise, he has come up with?
) 
) He is invaluable to Cleveland, but they seem to be doing all right w/o
) him in past weeks.
) 
) Linus Huang
) huang@cs.uiuc.edu
) 

He's out indefinitely with a sprained thumb or something like that - Ferry
has been stepping up very nicely in place of Hot Rod (He's fifth in rebounding,
third in blocked shots, and averaging 8 points per 19 minutes per game in the
team)
-- 
Rajesh
:: I hope if dogs ever take over the world, and they chose a king, they     ::
:: don't just go by size, because I bet there are some Chihuahuas with some ::
:: good ideas.								    ::
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: tamada@cheshire.oxy.edu (Michael K. Tamada)
Subject: Re: Phoenix is absolutely scary...
Organization: Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041 USA.
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 20:24:32 GMT

In article <1993Jan4.181154.10218@ll.mit.edu> nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith) writes:

>In article <1993Jan4.092551.19979@cheshire.oxy.edu> tamada@cheshire.oxy.edu (Michael K. Tamada) writes:
>>In article <43013@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> aminkoff@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Tony Minkoff) writes:
>>>Maybe sometime in the next week, if I have time, I will actually
>>>calculate the opponents'-points-per-possession (OPPPPP?) stat for
>>>each team for last year.  (I don't think I have current data
>>>available.  If somebody can provide me with it, I'd be most
>>>appreciative.)
>>
>>      Sorry, I don't have 'em.  The USA Today gives great individual stats, 
>>but incomplete team stats.  Don't know where to get complete team stats...
>>maybe The Sporting News?
>>
>>    Mike Tamada
>
>the files, 92 and 92-wide, in /misc/doc/nbastats/facts/stats have the
>individual 1991-1992 totals under each team, but it doesnt have the team
>totals.  an approximation may be obtained by adding up the individuals, but,
>with mid-season trades, they wont be accurate.  :-(
>
>- nate

     Oh, I thought Tony was refering to 1992-93.  If he needs 1991-92, then
the better NBA preview magazines have the team stats for 1991-2: Sporting
News Preview, Petersons, Basketball Digest, Street & Smith, etc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |__	       o
  | W			   Mike Tamada
		  |\	   Institutional Research Office
		   \O	   Occidental College
		    |      tamada@oxy.edu
		   /|
		  | |
From: mittman1@athena.mit.edu (Christopher T Chiu)
Subject: answer to: QUESTION: 1st NBA 3pt shot?
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 18:07:07 GMT

Rick Muller writes:
>Who hit the NBA's first 3 point shot?

The answer is former Celtic player(and current Celtic head coach)
Chris Ford.

From a curious student of basketball,
Genghis
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: ortcm@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (thomas.mcguigan)
Subject: Re: BOXSCORE nyk30orl27.08jan93
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 20:19:47 GMT

In article <C0pLzo.5z6@NeoSoft.com> claird@NeoSoft.com (Cameron Laird) writes:
>Is there some rule that Orlando can never
>have more than three people in double
>figures in a single game?  TERRY CATLEDGE?!

Yes, it is a rule (why else would Orlando throw away so many games in the
closing minutes).  But, like all rules it has its exceptions - in Orlando's
game against Indiana on 11/27 all five of Orlando's starters scored in 
double figures.

Tom@Orlando ( :) )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D. Oliver III)
Subject: Re: I BEE-LEEVE!  Nellie is a JEE-NYOUS!
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 08:24:42 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.014612.19283@leland.Stanford.EDU> terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU (Terry Wong) wrote:
> Your last shot was riduculous though.  Of course, Nelson wants quality
> big men -- to say he doesn't is ludicrous.  Also, you can hardly
> characterize the Warriors guarding Robinson as stiffs.  

My fault.  Not stiffs, what's the word I'm looking for . . ?

> Gatling did an especially good defensive job on Robinson,
> inducing the Admiral into 3 offensive fouls in the game.

Yes, and two of those "offensive fouls" consisted of Gatling hammering
Robinson, then Robinson pushing back and getting called.  

> These are hardly the stats of stiffs!  Rather, these guys are
> young (Gatling and Alexander are in their 2nd year, while Hill is in his
> 3rd year) and are still inconsistent and need time to develop.  Your account
> makes the Warriors appear to be a bunch of goons.  

Goons!  That's exactly the right word.  That's exactly what they were
doing.  If they have so much talent, then why don't they play like it
instead of doing their Jim Petersen routines.  

The fact is that ever since the playoff series two years ago, when Nelson
admittedly outcoached Larry Brown, Warrior centers have gotten carte
blanche to run roughshod over Robinson, because Nellie has milked this
"we're such a poor little team, we have to get special considerations"
angle to the maximum.

Just for kicks, in the second half we started counting blatant uncalled
fouls on Robinson.  Not the piddly stuff, not routine physical play, not
people trying to establish defense position, not handchecking, just good
old-fashioned wallops to the head and the like.  We stopped at seven in the
middle of the third quarter. 
____________________________
	Jim Oliver  
	oliver@athena.mit.edu /	joliver@hstbme.mit.edu
	oliver%mitwccf.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
From: robert@aero.org (R. S. Statsinger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Lakers are in Trouble
Date: 4 Jan 1993 18:34:43 GMT
Organization: Your Guess Is As Good As Mine...
NNTP-Posting-Host: uniblab.aero.org

In article <1992Dec30.193405.9567@HQ.Ileaf.COM> raczka@HQ.Ileaf.COM (christopher raczka) writes:
|
|    I don't think there is much Jerry can do, there isn't a GM
|    inclined to deal with him and rightly so.

Probably true, and unfortunate. It seems that other GMs get wary whenever
West wants to deal with them. Whoever West mentions as his interest suddenly
becomes "untouchable" or "our rising star" or "our future" or "y'know, we were
just about to take a serious look at him". Truth is, most other GM's probably
dont know their own players as well as West does. I think West ought to start
a campaign of dis-information, maybe make a serious offer for Tim Kempton or
some klutz like that, just to see how far he can yank some other GM's chain   :-) :-)

|    I think the *best* move, is the one that they missed last year ...
|    (thanks to Dunleavy)
|    screw the playoffs and get in the lottery!!

That is such cowardly pigheaded BULLSHIT that I'm not going to comment further.

			R.S.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith)
Subject: Re: flame wars
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 15:50:18 GMT

In article <43077@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> kompella@cs.ucsd.edu (Vachaspathi Kompella) writes:
>...[]....
>Come on, Lor-Meeks was entertaining, in a way.  This is incinerator fodder
>from someone who's been practising on alt.flame...[]...
       i agree
>...[]...  I would imagine the
>Celtics are taking the loss of Bird, the poor performance of the Celtics, the
>fall from grace, a little too hard.

that fall was many moons (years, infact) ago....

>Like some of us Laker fans who can't take
>the losses to Dallas, the Magic, etc., or even the awful falling apart, e.g.,
>against Cleveland or Miami.  But we have hope.  They don't.  I mean, how much
>can you expect Reggie to do, even with a star center like Alaa?
>
>-Vach

you dont have hope either.  vlade?  elden?  buddha?  how much can you
expect james to do?  i'd like to see the lakers do well, but i dont
think it will happen.  maybe the draft seasons up and coming will be
good to both and the ancient rivalry can resume someday....

but then again it may be phoenix-orlando that will be the rivalry of
the 90's.

- nate
From: tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: how bad is Dallas? (Was: BOX and NOTES: MN vs DAL 1/2/93)
Date: 6 Jan 93 01:07:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: shelley.1idbbkINN9fv
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
NNTP-Posting-Host: carson.u.washington.edu

>By the way, which team other than the Lakers has lost to Dallas this
>season?

Dallas beat the Hawks on the night they retired Brad Davis's #15.

GT

And there is no truth to the rumor that the Mavs will retire the jerseys
of Jim Spanarkel and Chad Kinch this year.
From: aminkoff@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Tony Minkoff)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Team Standings and Stats
Date: 7 Jan 93 06:46:32 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <108000077@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> dougs@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM,
(Doug Steele) writes:
}                          MiamiHeat
}
}         Team Scoring Totals
}            Min  FGm  FGa   PCT   3m   3a  PCT  FTm  FTa  PCT  PTS   AVG
}Totals     6555 1021 2217  .461   97  258 .376  619  818 .757 2952  109.3
}Opponents  6555 1084 2213  .490   81  237 .342  584  791 .738 2833  104.9
}
}Record  8 - 19         Home  6 -  8         Away  2 - 11


This is utterly incredible.  How can a team that's outscoring the
opposition by an average of 4.4 points per game have a record of
8-19?

I mean, losing teams with positive point differentials are not
unheard of, but I can't remember ever seeing it to this extent.
What's going on here?

Tony
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: hrfortso@unix.amherst.edu (HARDY RYAN FORTSON)
Subject: Warriors big men
Organization: Amherst College
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 20:04:15 GMT

This is more or less in response to the rumor of trading Hill and Owens for
Schrempf and Smits.  I do not think that it would be a good trade for the
Warriors to make.  Schrempf is a great player, but he may not remain that
way for more than a couple of years.  He is a good shooter (and the Warriors
already have plenty of those) and a good rebounder (although last I checked,
the Warriors on average outrebound their opponents), but (call me optimistic)
Owens will be better in both of these areas in a couple of years (at least, he
will have the skills to be so even if Nelson doesn't let him utilize these 
skills).  Owens is a better all-around player than Kenny Anderson, Mutombo,
and even Richmond.  I do not think that the Warriors should mortgage their
future for a player that probably isn't the missing link.  Smits is a
fairly good shot blocker and an OK offensive player, but he can't rebound
(which is why Schrempf gets so many rebound opportunities).  His biggest
asset is size.  However, size alone will not answer the Warriors problems.
Phoenix is not any bigger than the Warriors (and probably smaller) and look
at how well they are doing.  The reason is Barkley the Enforcer.  The Warriors
do not need size so much as they need an intimidating defensive player.  If
one of the Warriors "big men" (Alexander, Hill, Gatling) could learn to play
with a little more power, the Warriors would be that much closer to a
championship.  (I know it probably won't happen this year, but be patient.)
Assuming that Owens (a decent defensive player himself) comes back in a couple
of weeks, the Warriors will have to adjust their starting line-up.  The 
forwards will be Owens and Mullin and the guards Hardaway and Sprewell.
Of the three "big men" (all of which are around 6-10), I think that Hill
has the potential to develop into a decent defensive center who can also
rebound and play offense.  It would help if he could add a little bit more
mass to his frame.  But not as much as Alexander, who is a bit too slow for
what the Warriors need.  Gatling is better at offense than defense and should
be Owens' backup.  Heck, Houston did a good job guarding Hakeem in the two
recent Warriors games.  Just don't have him in for the tip-off.

Thoughts, comments?

Ryan Fortson
From: alanj@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: how bad is Dallas? (Was: BOX and NOTES: MN vs DAL 1/2/93)
Date: 5 Jan 93 18:49:27 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1993Jan5.201148.22299@rti.rti.org>, wgr@rti.rti.org writes 
> How bad is Dallas?  It looks like they have their sights set on being the
> worst team (relatively speaking) in NBA history.  I figured they'd compete
> for worst team in the league with Minnesota and Denver, but they're in a
> class by themselves.

I think that they are bad enough that they will not win as many games as the 
Cowboys did in the regular season.  (The Cowboys won 13).

Alan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: sikorski@oj.miami.edu (Richard Sikorski)
Subject: chi Bulls @ mia Heat- 30dec
Followup-To: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Organization: University of Miami, RSMAS
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 04:21:22 GMT

[I'm so tired of being behind, that I'm grabbing just a
short headline and mini-boxscore from the paper. I'll post
more detail later...]

Chicago Bulls at Miami Heat on 30 Dec 92

(chi)Jordan's scoring led Chicago to its 6th win in-a-row,
105-100, for their 16th win (no losses) over the Miami Heat.
   (chi)Jordan attempted and converted made the most fts ever
by a single player against the Heat (21-24). (mia)Rice led
Miami scoring, including a team-record 18pts in Q4. Chicago
outscored Miami 30-21 in Q3, and held on with an 8-2 run to
lead by 92-83 with 4min left.

CHICAGO BULLS
          min fga-m fta-m pts
Grant      36  7 14  6  7  20,  9rbs, 4 tos
Pippen     43  6 12  5  6  18,  8 assists
Cartwright 21  2  4  1  1   5
Armstrong  36  4  7  1  1  10
Jordan     40  9 18 21 24  39,  8 assists, 3 steals
King       15  0  1  0  0   0
Perdue     11  1  2  1  2   3
Paxson      5  1  1  0  0   2
Tucker     16  0  2  0  0   0
McCray     17  4  4  0  0   8
       fga-m 3fga-m fta-m or-tr  a pf s to b pts
Totals 34 65   2  3 35 41  8 30 23 19 6 10 6 105
Team rebounds 9

MIAMI HEAT
          min fga-m fta-m pts
Rice       36 12 18  4  4  33,  5-6 3fgs
Salley     29  1  6  1  2   3,  technical foul
Seikaly    36  5 10  3  6  13,  4 tos
Coles      40  4  7  5  6  13,  8 assists
Edwards    32  7 15  1  1  15
Long       31  5  8  1  2  11, 13rbs
Miner      24  5 14  0  0  10,  4 tos
Burton     12  1  4  0  0   2,  2 steals
       fga-m 3fga-m fta-m or-tr  a pf s to b pts
Totals 40 82   5  8 15 21 16 40 18 28 5 11 3 100
Team rebounds 6

Chicago 28 17 30 30 -105
Miami   25 24 21 30 -100

--
Richard Sikorski     sikorski@oj.miami.edu
                   r.sikorski@rsmas.miami.edu