From: cmort@NCoast.ORG (Christopher Morton)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Gay Child Molesters (Re: Youth Info Needed)
Date: 20 Dec 92 23:39:26 GMT
Reply-To: cmort@ncoast.org (Christopher Morton)
Followup-To: talk.politics.misc
Organization: North Coast Public Access *NIX, Cleveland, OH

As quoted from <1h2hhvINN888@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> by stephen@orchid.UCSC.EDU (x4604 (Hauskins)):

> In article <BzJ6LH.555@NCoast.ORG> cmort@ncoast.org (Christopher Morton) writes:
> >As quoted from <1992Dec18.231739.25570@panix.com> by roy@panix.com (Roy Radow):
> >
> >> Dear Phil,
> >> 
> >>     I applaud and join you in support of our Constitutional right 
> >> to freedom of speech, press and assemble.
> >
> >I'm sure you do.  It's a DAMNED shame that loathsome parasites such as you
> >benefit from the 1st Amendment, but that's unavoidable.  Still nobody has to
> >like or respect YOU.  Very few DO.  You have that in common with Frank Colin
> >and the Nazis.
> >
> 
> Oooo la la!  You do have a way with words, don't you!  Answer sensibly
> or don't bother... wasn't you who disliked the term 'strayts', maybe
> I will adopt that term and too bad for you if you don't like it.
> Becuase people like you are protected by the 1st amendment- and as
> you said unavoidable. ;^)
> 
Why yes, I DO have a way with words.  Thank you.  I suspect that "sensibly" 
means "in support of child molestation".

"Strayts"?  Never seen the term, at least as spelled, and don't really care.
Use it to your heart's content.  You've obviously mistaken me for someone
else.

> >ANY adult who knowingly has sex with a child should have a head on collision
> >with a bullet.  "Consensual" sex with a child is as much bullshit as 
> >"consensual rape".  Child molestation is no more beneficial than child
> >dismemberment.  There IS no disctinction between your candy coated 
> >platitudes and rape.  NONE AT ALL.  Few people are buying the bullshit.  Not
> >straight, not gay, NOT AT ALL.
> >
> 
> I think the same thing about any adult who lust after mature 11-12 year 
> old girls.  But of course that is a healthly normal thing right?  At least
> I remember you saying that it was.  So where is the line then, maybe
> a little lust or leering at some young girls.  Maybe sort of let them
> know you are, or not and go home and have yourself a nice sexual fantasy.
> 
I agree completely.  Shoot people who knowingly have sex with CHILDREN.  Gender
is immaterial.  As I said above, if you think I support child molestation
regardless of gender, you've obviously confused me with someone else.  Perhaps
you should know to whom and of what you are talking before you post.  It saves
considerable embarrassment.

> And BTW what is knowingly has sex with a child? How would one not know,
> unless of course it is one of the sexually mature 11-12 year olds.
> 
I'm leaving no room for ambiguity.  If you're having sex with an 11 year old
of either gender, you have a problem.  I'd like to see you have a TERMINAL
problem.  As I said, knowing what you're talking about largely eliminates the
kind of embarrassment which you are bringing upon yourself here.

> I love all of your solutions to things- blow em away, bullet in their
> heads, etc. etc.
> 
For child molestors, sure.  Why, do you support them?  Notice I ASK, since I
don't know you and won't pretend that I know your opinion.  Please do me the
same courtesy.

> >>     May you and yours have a joyous holiday season and a happy and 
> >> healthy New Year. Peace On Earth, Good Will Toward Men.
> >> 
> >May a large meteor strike yours.
> 
> Again, very nice.  
> >
> 
> So a happy meteoric christmas to all, and to all an explosive new year.
> 
Well, child molestors anyway.
> 


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------  

"Well whose opinions did you THINK these were...?" 
------------------------------------------------------------------  
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc