HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Approved-By:  Diane Kovacs <DKOVACS@KENTVM.KENT.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.govdoc-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:24:38 EDT
From:         "Karolyn S. Karge" <kkarge%silver.sdsmt.edu@Kentvm.Kent.edu>
Subject:      Duplicate Sudoc Numbers on Microfiche
Comments: To: govdoc-l@psuvm.psu.edu
Comments: cc: kkarge@silver.sdsmt.edu

----------------------------Original message----------------------------


I have received two microfiches with the same sudoc number.  The
Sudoc number is EP 1.107:V 81/991.  The two titles are (1) National
priorities lists sites:  Vermont, and (2) National priorities list
sites:. . . Virginia.  Has anybody else run across this?  Has anybody
found out which microfiche goes to the sudoc number EP 1.107:V 81/991,
and what the other sudoc number is?  I found OCLC numbers for the
two, but neither had a "086" field.  The OCLC number for Vermont is
26490294 and for Virginia, it is 26480038.  Could somebody let me
kow if they have figured this out.  I would greatly appreciate it!!

Just one other thing, in document EP 1.8:D 26/2, User's Guide and
Data Dictionary for Kenai Lakes Investigation Project, in the back
there is a pocket for microfiche, but I did not receive any.  Did
everybody get an empty pocket in the back of their document, or
is mine missing the fiche.

Thanks in advance for all your help!!

Karolyn Karge
Gov Docs
SD Sch of Mines and Tech
Rapid City, SD  57701
E-mail:  kkarge@silver.sdsmt.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL16]
Approved-By:  Diane Kovacs <DKOVACS@KENTVM.KENT.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.govdoc-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 13:46:01 EDT
From:         r1jtp%akronvax.BITNET%PSUVM.PSU.EDU@Kentvm.Kent.edu
Subject:      OFFERS FROM 92-2216M
Comments: To: govdoc-l@psuvm.psu.edu

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
We received complete duplicates of item # 856-B-06 on shipping list
92-2216M.

PrEx 7.10:FBIS-AFR-92-119 through 124 and Table of Contents
92-085-104

  PrEx 7.10:FBIS-NES-92-119 through 124, Supp. 117 and Table
of Contents 92-085-104


I will be happy to send to the first response I receive.

Contact me directly -- Janine T. Pavkov
                       University of Akron
                       Bierce Library
                       Akron, Ohio  44325-1708

                       Phone (216) 972-5107
                       E-mail:  JTPavkov@UAKRON.EDU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%"govdoc-l@psuvm"
Approved-By:  Raeann <RAED@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.govdoc-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 09:41:20 CST
From:         BAURE%MEMSTVX1@PSUVM.PSU.EDU
Subject:      OSHA CD-ROM

----------------------------Original message----------------------------

We had occasion to use the OSHA CD-ROM this week and were greatly impressed
with it!!  The software was easy, quick, and really quite elegant.  We were
able to answer our state OSHA office couldn't.  We certainly recommend it
highly!

Beth Baur
Government Documents, Memphis State Univ. Libraries
baure@memstvx1
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Apparently-To: govdoc-l@psuvm.bitnet
Approved-By:  Diane Kovacs <DKOVACS@KENTVM.KENT.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.govdoc-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:29:36 EDT
From:         "Ellen Gilliam, LKG Library and Info Services,
              DTN 226-7073 20-Nov-1992 1428" <gilliam@delni.enet.dec.com>
Subject:      Text of POSIX standard
Comments: To: govdoc-l@psuvm.psu.edu

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Can anyone tell me if the full text of the POSIX standard (IEEE 1003.1 or
ISO/IEC 9945-1) is available anywhere as an electronic document which can be
used without copyright violation?

Thanks
Ellen Gilliam

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
*  Ellen Gilliam                           (508) 486-7073 (voice)          *
*  Principal Information Specialist        (508) 486-7557 (fax)            *
*  Digital Equipment Corp.                                                 *
*  LKG1-2/J10                                                              *
*  550 King Street                  EMAIL:                                 *
*  Littleton, MA  01460-1289          Internet gilliam@delni.enet.dec.com  *
*                                     MCIMail    Ellen Gilliam ID/486-6811 *
*                                     DIALMAIL   9605                      *
*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
From: kla!anil@SUN.COM
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: stacker, superstore, xtra drive
Date: 18 Nov 92 22:55:07 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
content-length: 442


	>   How much is xtra drive?  It sounds pretty good.

	Bought mine for $49 + tax.

 -----------------------------------------------------------------
  Anil Somani               uucp: sun!kla!anil
  KLA Instruments Corp.     Domain: kla!anil@sun.com
  160 Rio Robles            M/S A2-3400, Phone: 408/456-6408
  San Jose, CA 95161-9055   Pager:408/865-7644 Fax:408/434-4284
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 12:17:23 EDT
From:         "Robert M. Gilpin" <gilpin@JAPAN.MIT.EDU>
Subject:      Network Fax Software

I am looking for windows Fax software to use on a Novell network. I would prefer
as much functionality as possible (OCR/compression, delayed transmission, faxing
from within programs etc), and hope to avoid using a dedicated PC or cluttering
up the server with an NLM.  Any suggestions?

R.GILPIN
GILPIN@MIT.EDU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Pmrqc:      1
Priority:     normal
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 00:20:34 CST
Reply-To:     BitzM@columbia.dsu.edu
From:         Mike <BITZM@COLUMBIA.DSU.EDU>
Subject:      Oak SVGA Drivers

    I presently own a 1024x768 monitor and an Oak VGA card with 256K,
capable of displaying 800x600.  I own a 486 with 4 meg of 60 n.s.
memory, and run Windows 3.1 extensively.  Whenever I try to change
the windows setup to run in 800x600 mode, my computer freezes up.  I
have tried the drivers included in Windows 3.1 and the drivers
included on a disk when I purchased my card.  None of them seem to
work.  Everything works excellent, however, when I run in standard
640x480 mode.  Any suggestions?

                                Thanks in advance,

                                Mike




    +-------------------------------------------------+
    |  M I K E   B I T Z                              | \
    |  R I C H A R D S O N   H A L L   1 0 5          |  |
    |  D A K O T A   S T A T E   U N I V E R S I T Y  |  |
    |  M A D I S O N ,   S D   5 7 0 4 2 - 1 7 9 9    |  |
    |                                                 |  |
    |  V O I C E   O R   D A T A :                    |  |
    |  6 0 5 / 2 5 6 - 5 4 8 1                        |  |
    |                                                 |  |
    |  <<<Internet:  BITZM@COLUMBIA.DSU.EDU>>>        |  |
    +-------------------------------------------------+  |
     \__________________________________________________\
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 20:03:27 EST
From:         Craig Neimanis <R3CEN@AKRONVM.BITNET>
Subject: RE: S. O. S. new virus
              17 Nov 1992 16:33:00 -0400 from <KHINDRIA@HSCVAX.CSU.MCMASTER.CA>

Well, after I used CPAV 2, it was gone.  Everything's a-okay at this end.
I checked anyway though, as your suggestion said, and my systems were okay.
Thanks.

            Craig
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sun, 15 Nov 1992 06:08:00 EST
Comments:     <Parser> E: "From:"/"Sender:" field is missing.
From:         Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster <POSTMASTER@UICVM.BITNET>

QUIT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Popmail-Charset: English
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:42:10 CST
Reply-To:     phk@boombox.micro.umn.edu
From:         "Philip H. Kachelmyer" <phk@BOOMBOX.MICRO.UMN.EDU>
Subject:      re: selling stuff on list

On Mon, 16 Nov 1992 14:59:09 CT, Brent A. Waechter wrote:

>I say NO!  There is enough traffic on this list without having to sift
>through messages regarding the sales of software.

I agree wholeheartedly.  There are other forums for selling things.
If everyone starts posting this sort of thing the forum will become
useless.


pppppp           Philip H. Kachelmyer                       (612) 625-6821
p  h  ph         Computer & Information Services       fax: (612) 625-6817
ppphppkh  k      University of Minnesota
p  hhhkh k       148 Shepherd Labs     Internet: phk@boombox.micro.umn.edu
p  h  kkk        100 Union St. SE        BITNET: phk@umnacvx.bitnet
   h  kh k       Minneapolis, MN 55455
      k   k
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:44:14 -0500
From:         "(Louis Jezsik)" <jezsik@PX4.STFX.CA>
Subject:      ProComm+ for Windows

I've brought this up before without any success, but I will try again

in hopes that there is someone out there who can help me.

        I am using ProComm + for Windows using VT-320 emulation.  There

are no problems other than pasting text.  If I attempt to paste text

into my mail message, it will come out double spaced.  The manual is

pretty useless in trying to solve the problem.  (In the problem solver

section it says if I'm having a problem with the double spacing, it

has something to do with CR CR/LF between ProComm and the other

machine and that I should read chapter 4.  Chapter 4 sheds NO light

whatsoever.  Grrr!)

        So, can anyone tell me how to paste with success?  Thanks in

advance!

Louis

d
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 13:45:13 EST
From:         "(Arron S. King)" <aking@HEIDELBERG.EDU>
Subject: Re: Compuserve

You can get to compuserve by way of internet.,
telnet to hermes.merit.edu ( or some such address, and choose compuserve.)
the catch is  that your account will be billed the phone charges!
these range from somewhere around $20.00 during primetime to about
$10.00 regular hours. This hourly charge is one hell of a deterent.

If you are really interested in the address, e-mail me and I will look it
up for you.

Arron King
Heidelberg College
aking@heidelberg.edu

"my opinions don't reflect those of my employer, 'cause I don't have one!"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 19:20:37 PST
From:         "(Vance M. Gloster)" <gloster@INFERENCE.COM>
Subject:      Diamond VGA drivers
              23 Nov 1992 19:29:00 EST
              <9211240213.AA03800@fourier.inference.com>

  I'm a little confused concerning Diamond's VGA cards. I always thought the
  Stealth card was the fastest Windows accelerator card that Diamond makes. Now
  I hear there is a Speedstar 24 and 24x out. I guess 24 means 24 bit, but at
  what resolution? How fast are they compared to the Stealth. Why are they
 cheaper
  ?

The Stealth is optimized for traditional Windows apps, like Excel and
Word.  It is very fast at displaying TrueType fonts, scrolling a
window, minimizing a window, etc.  In normal applications, however,
there is very little of the BitBlt operation.  This is where a bitmap
is blasted onto the screen as fast as possible.  The Stealth is not
slow at BitBlt-ing, but the Speedstar 24 cards are much faster at it.

BitBlt-ing is what you do when displaying animations or movies on the
screen.  If your main application under Windows will be Video for
Windows (Microsoft's new product that is similar to Apple's QuickTime
movie player), or you need the extra million colors (for photo
retouching or color publishing) the Speedstar 24 is your best bet.  If
you are doing anything else, the Stealth will give you better
performance.

The Speedstar 24 is cheaper because it does not have the expensive S3
graphics chip and peripheral circuitry.

-Vance Gloster
 gloster@inference.com
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 08:04:00 EST
From:         Michael Gordon <GORDONM@DENISON.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: ATM FOnts and Windows

>
>Does windows accept ATM fonts??   If so how come it won't recognize them
>in the control panel for fonts??
>
        Windows accepts ATM fonts if you have ATM running and have installed
them throug ATM. You can access them. not from ControlPanel, buy from the ATM
program. And you should see them as an option in your program if you have
unchecked the DisplayOnlyTTFonts selection in ControlPanel/Fonts/TrueType.

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  18-NOV-1992 08:03:57
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sun, 15 Nov 1992 10:14:30 -0700
From:         Mike Lieberman <cwmliebe@ANTELOPE.WCC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: The Next Version of Windows for DOS

On Sun, 15 Nov 1992, Blake Coverett wrote:

>
> There are (or will be shortly) three mainstream products in the Windows
> OS family:
>
> Windows 3.1
> Windows for Workgroups 3.1
> Windows NT 3.1
>
> These can be considered proper supersets of each other, i.e.
> WinNT > WFW > Win 3.1
>
> Win32 is not a product, it is an API.  In fact it is the primary API
> in WinNT (with Win16, OS/2 16 character mode, POSIX and DOS being the others)
>
> These three systems will coexist for some indeterminate time into the future.
>
> The parts that seem to be getting confused into the postings above are
> "Win32s" and "Win32 on DOS"
>
> Win32s is a set of VxDs and DLLs that allow a Win32 application to run on
> Windows 3.1 in enhanced mode (it provides the full Win32 API, but only
> implements subset comparable to when is in Win16.)  A preliminary set of
> Win32s libraries is included with the October SDK.  These libraries will
> be fully redistributable.
>
> "Win32 on DOS"  Microsoft has publically announced that some time in the
> future there will be a new versions of Windows on DOS that implements
> the full Win32 API.  When it will be available and what it will be called
> (i.e. what version) has not yet been finalized.
>
> -Blake

Sorry Blake but it ain't so.  WFW is a set of extensions not a new
product.  These extensions can be found in Windows NT as well as a WFW
extension offering for Win 3.1. It will also be incorporated into Win 32
for DOS when it is released.

Blake! I never discussed Win32s in the previous message, so don't know
where you came up with that.

Win 32 for DOS will be a 32-bit version of Windows sharing the
multithreading 23-bit libraraies with Windows NT.  It will provide native
capabilities to run NT code on a DOS machine, so long as that machine is a
80386 or better. It will be the logical migration path for most users who
are not going to NT.  Excluded from Win 32 for DOS will be standard mode.

Microsoft has not said that it would support all 32-bit functions without
Win 32 and they won't.  The DOS versions that support full 32-bit code
will be Win 32 for DOS.

To suggest that all will co-exist easily in the future is simply without
foundation. The Intel/Microsoft experience has been one of downward
compatibility NOT upward compatibility and that isn't going to change this
time either.
From: JFT@NCCIBM1.BITNET (JFT@NCCIBM1.BITNET)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: ** VISUAL BASIC QUESTION **
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:35:00 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

Hi,

  I want to write a file using some encryption method,
something like offsetting each byte to the left or right?
Does anyone know what commands in Visual Basic I would
need to start looking at to do this?  Of course I need to
then read the file also.  I also want to search the data,
how difficult is it to write a indexing routine in Visual
Basic?  Is there an ftp site that has sample VB code?

  Thanks!

John.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: Logitech Drivers
From: pmacfar@eis.calstate.edu (Paul MacFarlane)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 13:50:22 GMT
Organization: Calif State Univ/Electronic Information Services

> I think I have version 6.20, but at home, so I cannot check right now. I
> downloaded from 415-795-0408 (in Feb. 92). If somebody downloads a never
> version from there I would like a copy, because calling that number from
> Germany is a kind of expensive. There is no Logitech BBS in Germany

About a year ago, many of the 415 numbers changed to 510.  I don't know if
that affects this particular number or not, but for an expensive call, it
might be worth checking out first.
Paul MacFarlane
Danville, California
pmacfar@eis.calstate.edu

Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  JNET%"win3-l@uicvm"
Original_cc:  STSK
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:45:00 N
From:         Sune Karlsson <STSK@SEHHS.BITNET>
Subject:      w4w formatting

Hellmut,
I haven't tried this - so there's no guarantuee that it will work.

In the template you use for letters create the following macro and
name it FilePrint. Choosing File Print will then execute the macro instead
of just printing the document.

Sub Main

EditGoto "\StartOfDoc"
'Apply the formatting you require for the first page. For example
EditClearFormatting
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 09:47:56 EST
From:         "(Joseph T. Malloy)" <jmalloy@ITSMAIL1.HAMILTON.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Help! Windows locks up on Network...
              "BITZM@COLUMBIA.DSU.EDU" at Nov 18, 92 7:13 pm

>
> Hello, all.  Whenever I login my network, then run Windows (3.1), the
> Windows logo appears, but then the computer locks up...hard.  Any
> suggestions.  I think it may be something to do with memory
> conflicts, but I am by no means a memory expert...  Thank you.
>
> Here's information about my system:
> -386DX/40, 4 meg RAM, 130 meg HD (240 stacked)
> -Token Ring network, running Novell netware v. 3.26
> -Windows 3.1
> -SVGA 800x600
>
> Any comments or suggestions would be greatly appereciated.
> -Mike
>
Try starting Windows in standard mode by typing 'win /s' to start.  If
that seems to work ok, then simplify your autoexec.bat and config.sys
files to a bare minimum as a start.  MS recommends something like

config.sys                      autoexec.bat

device=c:\himem.sys             path=c:\;c:\dos;c:\windows;
files=30                        prompt $p$g
buffers=30                      set temp=c:\temp

Two notes: drives and paths should, of course, reflect your hd setup;
and also install in either/both files any drivers that your system
absolutely requires to run.

I'd elminiate both the network drivers and the network card at first (I
mean physically pull the card, if you can).  Once Windows is running in
386 enhanced mode, start adding drivers and cards back until the problem
returns.  At that point, you at least know what the problem is and,
perhaps, which upper memory blocks to exclude.

You can also try starting Windows with 'win /d:x' (gee, I hope I recall
that correctly!), which is supposed to start Windows up without recourse
to UMB.

Good luck!

Joe
From: tabitha@vms.huji.ac.il
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: stacker, superstore, xtra drive
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:40:53 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

After reading accounts of stacker, superstore and xtra drive,
xtra drive seems the most elegant solution to real time
compression.  I have a few questions, though.

1.  Does it compress as well?

2.  How slow is slow?  I have a 485/33.  Will I notice the difference?

3.  Can I compress floppies as with the other two?

thanks in advance.

-dennis
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 09:03:31 EST
From:         "D. Maddox" <maddox@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL>
Subject: Re: selling stuff on list

One no vote.  Maybe a seperate list for classifieds.  I don't believe you
are allowed to advertise a for profit business on the INTERNET.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
From: bsardis@netcom.com (Barry Sardis)
Subject: Re: Compuserve
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 01:47:21 GMT

"(Arron S. King)" <aking@HEIDELBERG.EDU> writes:

>You can get to compuserve by way of internet.,
>telnet to hermes.merit.edu ( or some such address, and choose compuserve.)
>the catch is  that your account will be billed the phone charges!
>these range from somewhere around $20.00 during primetime to about
>$10.00 regular hours. This hourly charge is one hell of a deterent.

>If you are really interested in the address, e-mail me and I will look it
>up for you.

>Arron King
>Heidelberg College
>aking@heidelberg.edu

>"my opinions don't reflect those of my employer, 'cause I don't have one!"

I can get directly to Compuserve. Just replace the comma with a period. So 
my Compuserve mail address would be 70105.1210@compuserve.com.

-- 
Barry Sardis		| Home:   (408) 448-1589
1241 Laurie Avenue	| Office: (408) 448-7404
San Jose, CA 95125	| Fax:    (408) 448-7404
Email: bsardis@netcom.COM or 70105,1210@compuserve.COM
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l