HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Dear Moana
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 02:49:53 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.235651.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <1993Jan27.021209.25779@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>
>You jason are a son of a bitch. You Jason are not able to 
>flame. You jason are boring.
**YAWN**  Say, you are really pissed off aren't you.

Good.

I noticed that you couldn't get through a flame without deviating from your
cache of catch-phrases.  Really...I am boring, you say...I can't flame, you 
tell me...oh, and I am a son of a bitch...ho hum...can't you do better than
that?  Probably not.

 yYou jason do not understand 
>that WHEN I SAY THIS TO YOU, I AM *SERIOUS*.
You need to make up your mind.  Are you going to be serious, or are you gonna
bullshit.  You pathetic weasel.  Whatever you do, it will be as ineffective as 
it has always been.

By the way...you promised us all a "war".  When's it coming?  Trying to 
mobilise your invisible "supporters"?  Well...I'm waiting.
From: afrolik@ub.d.umn.edu (Ed Olczyk)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Your pointless existance
Date: 26 Jan 93 21:48:24 GMT
Distribution: alt
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu

In article <1k4970INN99r@ub.d.umn.edu> serickso@ub.d.umn.edu (Scott) suggests:
>
>Previously afrolik@ua.d.umn.edu (Ed Olczyk) spewed: 
>>Unfortunately for us, you do exist.  Thank you very much for wasting my time
>>with your meaningless 'article'.  (I use the term loosely)  I waited all day
>>to read something like this.  When I saw it I just about creamed my pants.
>>Thanks again.
> 
>Nobody cares that you wasted your time.  The fact that you waited all day to

Ah, you are mistaken.  Apparently I care, otherwise I wouldn't have responded
now would I?

>read that article and that you "creamed" your pants upon reading that article
>shows that you are easily excited over trivial things.  This leads me to

Yes, I am.  Your mindless babbling excites me a great deal.  As does your
apparently advanced knowledge.  Maybe, after my schooling is done here I will
be able to match wits with you.  Unfortunately, it appears that you would
have to get some wits first.  Also I would care to wager that you wait all
day to read newsgroups, since you obviously have no life whatsoever.
      
>believe that you are of very low intelligence with psychosexual problems

Duh, what does that mean?  Yes, obviously it takes no intelligence to operate
a computer because you do it very well.

>stemming from your inability to get laid.  The fact that you also thanked

Ah, yes, the old 'inability to get laid' line.  I used to use this when I
wasn't getting any, either.  As such, I feel bad for you that you are having
problems with the opposite sex.  Maybe if you spent some time in places other
than a computer lab or at 'beer tasting festivals' you would be able to
improve your relations with females.  (or whatever it is that you have
relations with)

>someone for their "meaningless" article shows that you are overly concerned
>with appeasing others.  This insecurity no doubt comes from you obviously low
>intelligence.  You should stop posting your mindless articles to this group

Apparently you don't have enough intelligence to figure out that I was being
sarcastic.

>and instead, concentrate on doing something that shows some sign of
>intelligence.

There's that intelligence word again.  Did you just learn that today in your
SSP class?  I'm very proud of you.

>
>--
(I ought to be) >Sc(h)ott


-- 
Tony Frolik                                        afrolik@ua.d.umn.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: a misunderstood apology
Date: 25 Jan 93 06:59:31 GMT
Organization: Washington University,  St Louis MO

Ah, I was forgetting: 
Mr Jason Linkins: Moana can take what she want. And if she doesn't want to
take anything, she doesn't. You, little professor, read carefully my postings 
before saying crap about me and about how I deal with Michele. I've never
dealt with him because, differently to you and your endless pseudo-serious
replies, I don't speak seriously with a pig that doesn't have the sufficient
IQ for scrambling an egg. Am I clear??!!

Moana.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: Re: ANOTHER CANADIAN C+O+C+K+R+O+A+C+H <===============
Keywords: cockroach, arsehole, canadian fuckboy, archive boy jr.
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Distribution: alt
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 23:13:19 GMT

martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan) writes:

>[GRALEY / DALLAGATA LIKE RANTING AND VOMITING CRUSHED]

>>-- 
>>		 John Henders
>>		 Vancouver,BC

>Another alt.canadian.fuckwad (tm) (c) <=== Pay attention Michele!!!

>So, they are un hibernating. They are coming out of there little teepees
>up north and shaking there little pee pees at The World Rulers, The Americans.

HAHAHA!!!!  That's what you think of Canadians.  Man you Americans really
are ignorant.  For your information, Vancouver is in a lower latitude
than Venice, Italy.  You can keep your stupid Yankee illusions, for all
we care.  But one correction.  We don't live in Teepees.  Those are plains
tribes.  If you want to be consistant you have to say "igloos".  Those
are traditional northern habitations.  

>Fuck off snowman. 

Snowman.  We actually do have snow up here this year.  Other than that,
the last time I saw snow stick to the ground was '88.  The North West
Coast is actually a rain-forest (between us and Washington state, it's
second only to Brasil in acres/second destruction).

KMM

>~THE BETTER NAME (tm) (c) <==== Pay attention Michele!!!
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: 26 Jan 1993 18:14:00 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk
Keywords: February 14th is *just* around the corner! ;)

In article <C1G56B.498@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
|(Mr J S Graley) writes:
|>Sure did, missy. An I'm a-gonna finish it too.
|
|HEY!  Watch your tone of voice, buster.

no.

|>Of course, grammar flames are far more mature than spelling flames.
|>You sad hypocrite (the clitorially retarded should see below for explaination).
|
|I DON'T THINK I LIKE THAT.  (It's "explanation" and I don't think there IS 
|an adverb derived from the word "clitoris".)

There probably isn't. So fucking what?

|>I quote: 'OOOH a spelling flame'
|>
|>This is a winge if ever I heard one. Seems you just can't take the heat, missy.
|
|I'LL GIVE YOU SOME HEAT, PAL.

yawn.

|>My point is you are hypocritical. You say one thing, and then another. You
|>try to have your cake and eat it. 
|>[Graley's babbling deleted...]
|>Have you understood my point yet?
|
|I UNDERSTAND I MAY HAVE TO WHUP YOUR ASS, er ARSE IF YOU DON'T APOLOGIZE 
|TO MY FIANCEE, KATHERINE.

hmm... block caps. Scary.

|>Yes it is. Have you ever heard of the word 'rite'? Four letters. Add 'hypoc',
|>in a later turn, and you have 'hypocrite'.
|>
|>Let's face it : youre stupid.
|
|NO.  YOU'RE STUPID.
|
|>Now let's watch Kathy wank her ego over a simple matter which she has got
|>completely wrong...
|>
|>
|>Go ahead, feel free...
|>
|>(Katherine, My fiancee writes:)
|>|Maybe then your protozoan
|>
|>Protazoan? Remarkable...
|
|THE ONLY THING REMARKABLE ABOUT IT IS YOUR TEMERITY IN CORRECTING 
|KATHERINE'S CORRECT SPELLING OF "PROTOZOAN" WITH AN INCORRECT SPELLING, CRETIN.
|
Something really upset you, somewhere down the line, didn't it.

heh.

|>(Katherine, My fiancee writes:)
|>|brain will registeri it.
|>
|>Registeri? Even more remarkable...
|
|CLEARLY AN INADVERTENT TYPO ON KATHERINE'S PART.

Correct.

|>(Katherine's Excellent Put-Down left intact:)
|>|You don't have to flame me for saying Happy Chinese New Year just because
|>|it's a bad year for you.  I'm sure we all understand how humiliated
|>|you must feel in the year of the cock.
|>
|>Did I flame you? Awwww I'm _sooooo_ sorry. 
|>
|>fuck off and get a life, you sad bitch.
|
|THAT'S IT.         
|SOMEONE TAKE MY COAT.
|I'M GONNA TEACH THIS LOW-DOWN VARMINT A THING OR TWO ABOUT MANNERS.

Go ahead, arsehole, make my day.

|You OK, Princess?

Presumably he means the warty bitch.

|-- Andy

~THE GREAT NAME

PS
You know what they say, dont mix alt.flame with pleasure. Well they dont, but
seeing as how fucked-up you sound, I'm sure they will.

-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: Cannam@sc.ZIB-Berlin.de (Chris Cannam)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: 26 Jan 93 11:56:08
Organization: Konrad Zuse Zentrum fuer Informationstechnik Berlin
Distribution: alt
	<katherim.728001107@sfu.ca> <1k24p6INNoer@clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: borodin.zib-berlin.de
In-reply-to: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk's message of 26 Jan 1993 01:39:50 -0000


In article <1k24p6INNoer@clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk>
maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:

   I am doing a pure
   maths degree. Not only have I learned about logic, like you have, but I
   _actually_ _use_ _it_. Understand? When it comes to the ability to manipulate
   abstract (but potentially real) concepts in a consistent way, you
   philosophers just don't have it. My dad did philosophy as a degree, and
   he advised me to take maths.

My dad did languages, and _he_ advised me to take maths.  Why?
Because I was better at it than at languages.  So fucking what?

   Why? Because Philosophy is just a big boring
   history lesson. You wanna be a philosopher when you grow up? Firstly, DROP
   PHILOSOPHY. Learn about the world, about life, about how to think, and you
   may stand a chance. But so few people become sucessful philosophers, a
   degree in it is pretty much guaranteed to be a waste of time.

The connection between a pure maths degree and `the world and life' is
also extremely tenuous.  I don't think a philosophy degree has that
much connection either, but I don't think you're qualified to sound
off like this.

You wanna be a mathematician when you grow up?  So few people become
successful mathematicians...  What do _you_ think a `successful
philosopher' is?  A philosopher with a 9-5 job and steady earnings?

And what has logic got to do with alt.flame?  What has logic got to do
with anything?

   Sorry to shatter your dreams, Kathy.

I doubt if you have.

   |Perhaps you would like me to prove to you that you have no free will.
   |I can do that too.  Or that you cannot move.  It all can be logically
   |proven.

Maybe, but such a proof is pretty well meaningless.  (Yes, I know this
is Kathy I'm replying to here.)  The ability to prove something
logically is not likely to get you very far anywhere.  Most of the
things people hold as fundamental truths are logically wrong.  That
doesn't mean they aren't true.


--
           on sighting mathematicians it should unhook the algebra from their
             minds and replace it with poetry;  on sighting poets it should
               unhook poetry from their minds and replace it with algebra
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Blinded by love; Jism and J S Graley
Date: 26 Jan 93 21:48:39 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1k18usINN8c3@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
> In article <1993Jan22.151723.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
> |In article <1jp9ptINNcf1@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
> |
> |> I suggest the least embarissing thing for you to do is SHUT THE FUCK UP
> |> and PISS OFF.
> |
> |I suggest that you re-learn the proper spelling of "embarrassing", not that I
> |am one to judge, and then TOSS OFF.
> 
> You've excelled yourself this time, phantom. A spelling lame!. Maybe one day
> you will even learn how to do a proper Flame...

You have yet to do one, "Great lamer"
> 
> Then again, maybe not.

Then again, you lack the mental capacity.
> 
> |--The Phantom
> 
> PS I wonder why you call yourself 'Phantom'
> 
> Your email address is vsg001, so maybe V.S.G are your initials, and 001 means
> you are the only person with those initials in your institution. Just a guess.
> In the meantime, since 'phantom' is such a crap name, I wonder if anyone has
> any ideas about what name V.S.G. could feasably stand for?

Well, Sherlock Holmes does exists! Unfortunately he has lost his mind and
pretends to belong on alt.flame. Get back on your medication Graley.
> -- 
>     Don't worry,
>      Its like in the comic books...
>       ITS NOT REAL!

Neither is your life.

JEFF WITTY
ARMY R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: haushalt@research.nj.nec.com (Robert C.Haushalter)
Subject: Re: Rob Dobson's Butt on fire
Originator: haushalt@shakti
Organization: NEC Research Institute
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 12:51:46 GMT

In article <16060170@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com> tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:
>
>Langley (AP)
>
>Robert Dobson was hospitalized today after neighbors reported seeing a 
>young man running furiously around in chaotic circles in front of his 
>house. When neighbors investigated more closely, they found that Mr. 
>Dobson was still on fire in the area around his bottom.  Someone quickly
>doused the flames with a lawn hose and called an ambulance.  Dobson was
>apparently engaging in the newest rage among young college students, a 
>practice known as "blue flame". Although the phenomenon is not new, it
>is seeing a resurgence due to Dobson's constant demonstrations of blue
>flame in front of his peers, according to students on the University 
>campus. Most recently, Dobson was seen on top of the Engineering building
>demonstrating his technique to students gathered below. Crys of "jump!" 
>were heard, and campus police quickly responded but found that Dobson 
>had no intention of jumping. He apparently was reprimanded by school 
>officials, but was released, since he had not broken any laws.  Other
>students have joined in imitating Dobson, but this is the first report 
>of anyone being hurt by igniting their farts with a lighter. Hospital 
>officials indicated that this practice is dangerous and hope that students
>realize the seriousness of the act in light of what happened to Dobson.
>
>Film at 11.
>

Farts are usually greater than 95% methane.
-- 
The opinions are mine..not my company's.
Actually, everything is more complicated
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a la 400ci)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Mich's world (was Re: The right to rape.)
Date: 24 Jan 93 01:09:38 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1993Jan22.143840.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:

>In article <1993Jan22.112729.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, Par's playmate dallagata@
udphvx.cineca.it elucidates his conceptions:

>> Woman are nothing but sex-machines. 

You must be out of coins again Mich.

>> Every man has the right 
>> to fuck, it is a biological need. If a guy "rape" them HE IS 
>> RIGHT! HE DID BECAUSE THOSE BITCHIES ARE ONLY LOOKING FOR 
>> GUYS WITH MONEY, HANDSOME! And what about the poor ugly guys, 
>> like you and Martin that can't fuck just because women don't 
>> want them?!? There are not rapes on the world, it is only a 
>> women invention. They are not the owner of their pussy, *we* 
>> are. 

Just think, there's more like him out there somewhere.

>> They have just to shut up and to wait to be fucked, and 
>> to be HAPPY TO DO IT! 

Maybe you should give them a class, Mich.  Par says you know how to do it 
great.

>Thanks Einstein, Par-Zero, did you take notes?
Notes?  He's taking orders.

 -----------Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS--------
 ObQuotes:
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
 "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

    Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: m92mmy@tdb.uu.se (Mattias Myrberg)
Subject: Eat this stupid newsreader
Organization: His Own Place
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 03:38:07 GMT
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Mel, theme songs, the Beverly Hillbillys, and Mel's prose
Keywords: Can Troll be far behind?
Date: 24 Jan 93 07:55:12 GMT
Organization: S,s,stu,stu,stutering In,In,Insti,Insti,sti,stitute

(Melvin Gladstone) writes:
>andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>>vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>>>
>>>[babble]
>>
  [my proud limeric effort reluctantly deleted]
>
>Andy, you cheap slut.  You'll write a limerick for
>anyone.  Well how about a theme a song:

Now kids, don't be jealous.  There's enough to go around.

>
>Here's the story, of a man named Andy,
>Who was busy with three boys of his own,
>He kept them, chained in his basement,
>So he was not alone.
>
>Then one day this Andy met a policeman,
>An officer who acted on a hunch,
>He searched, through Andy's basement,
>And that's how Andy got his gruesome lunch!
>
>His gruesome lunch! etc.
>
>Melvin M. Gladstone


Wise guy, eh?.  I'll handicap my self by forcing myself to 
work with a time limit on my response.

(To the tune of the "Beverly Hillbillys" theme song]


Oh.. let me tell a story 'bout a boy named Mel.
Poor public schools never learned him how to spell.
Then one day he was posting like a fooooool...
up through the net came his festerin' stool.

Shit, that is.  Black Gold.  Fudge Factory.

Well, the next thing you know, ole Mel's a passin' air
And we all said "Mel! Cork it over there!
We ain't got time to be writing all this prose,
especially with one hand used pinchin off our nose.

Stink, that is.  


== Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 05:50:06 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <--j3hzr@rpi.edu> keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
>liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>->rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) writes:
>->>liz@leibniz.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>->>>Nobody said you couldn't.  And if you think you have seen male-bashing,
>->>>you're sadly mistaken.  I have yet to throw the big punches.
>->>
>->>So, throw some, Liz.  
>
>->Why?  
>
>it was a rhetorical, liz. trish was making fun of you,
>as are so many others.

Who?  List them, please.

>
>->I have better things to do with my time.
>
>oh? washing your hair again?

Wow. What a rapier wit you are, keegan.

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: an7898@anon.penet.fi
Subject: Phantom Exposed: His real name is Vinson Scott Goddard!
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: alt.flame
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:17:04 GMT

X-anon-to: alt.flame

Well it's claer why he was posting under pseudonym with a name like Vinson

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!  Vinson!   BWAHAHAHAHAH!!

Please redirect all responses from now on to "Vinnie" instead of phantom.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
From: king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: 25 Jan 93 17:00:32 GMT
Organization: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine

In article <1jrpdhINNqff@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>Nifty!  It's nice to know that I, and I alone, am responsible for the
>demise of alt.flame.  

No you aren't. I was exaggerating, albeit slightly. alt.flame has been slowly
eroding ever since first year PSU students were given net.access.

>Get real.  I hardly doubt that I am worse then the fuck-spewing idiots
>like Graley.  

No you aren't, but so what? You do very little to improve the SNR, which
Graley and Witty seem determined to reduce to zero.

>I'm sure you read those posts and have a hearty laugh,
>am I right?  Yeah, sure...

No you aren't (right, that is). Neither Graley or Witty make me laugh. Very
little here in alt.flame makes me laugh anymore. 

>Exactly.  And your attitude towards the group will decide what kind of
>posts you will make to it, whether they be witty statements of humor
>or "fuck fuck FUCK!"  That has nothing to do with the intelligence
>level of the poster.  

I think it does have something to do with just that. Braindead people post
braindead articles. Have Witty's articles passed you by? You think that he
should be credited with greater-than-room-temperature IQ? Wouldn't you
agree that his painfully diminuative cerebral capacity is accurately
reflected by his peurile and urbane postings?

>Just because you make stupid posts does not mean you are a stupid person.

No, but a stupid person is bound to make stupid posts almost all the time.

>>Shut up and watch for a while - you'll see.
>I did...I lurked for a good two months.  

Those weren't two good months, but you noticed that, apparently:
>You know what I saw?  Postings about
>male and female genetalia, postings of "OOGLE OOGLE OOGLE" and "fuck fuck
>FUCK!", and once in a great while, something funny.  

Yeah, I know. Depressing isn't it. Where's Richard Sexton when you need
him?

>And you say *I* am responsible for the demise of alt.flame?  

Well, not single-handedly, but you have been contributing to it. 

-- 
                       Se non e` vero, e` ben trovato 
     ...{utzoo|mnetor}!dciem!dretor!king        king@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Michele, pasta, pizza, and CHARLIE CHAPLIN!!
Date: 24 Jan 93 03:17:04 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan23.193632.1@acad.drake.edu>, vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
> In article <1993Jan23.140443.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
> 
>> Charlie Chaplin? Thank you. He has been a wonderful actor and a good lover.
>                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> MICHELE HAD A LOVE AFFAIR WITH CHARLIE CHAPLIN!!!!!
> You heard here first folks.

Idiot. I have been *compared* to Charlie Chaplin. You are 
envious just because you can be compared only to 
Rin Tin Tin.
> 
> --The Phantom

	Michele
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: why?
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 18:09:54 GMT

In article <35742@olympus.wustl.edu>, moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:

> Let me explain a little better. I don't know why but I have the strong
> feeling that this 'phantom' has painfully kicked the ass of Michele in the 
> remote past. Am I right? 

To an extent.... you see, we ALL have been kicking Michele painfully in the
ass.

--The Phantom
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Phantoms DON'T fade away...
Date: 22 Jan 1993 16:27:05 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <C16p63.Jxw@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
| OH GAWD PHANTOM! I'M SO GLAD YOU'RE BACK! PLEASE TALK TO ME, PLEASE, PLEASE,
| PLEASE, PLEASE, PUHLEAZZZZZE, TALK TO ME PHANTOM!  EVERYONE ELSE AROUND HERE
| IS IGNORING ME!  I'M SUCH A PATHETIC LOSER I'M ABOUT TO GO INSANE IF YOU 
| DON'T RECOGNIZE MY PATHETIC INSIGNIFICANT EXISTENCE! PLEASE SAY SOMETHING
| MEAN ABOUT ME, PHANTOM!

Andy, you need help.

~THE GREAT NAME
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!