HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bboerner@novell.com (Brendan B. Boerner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Benchmarking under Linux (was Re: New 486 Suggestions?
Date: 31 Aug 92 21:00:41 GMT
Organization: Novell, Inc. --Austin

>In article <pdhatchm.715057547@syzygy> of comp.os.linux,
> In my experience with Linux a faster CPU is a BIG advantage.
> 
> Someone preveously mentioned it taking a 486-33 12 minutes to do a
> "make clean ; make dep ; make".
> 
> My 486-50 does this in just over 4 mins.

This has me wondering: does anyone have any benchmarking or performance
metric programs for Linux?  I've got a 386/16Mhz w/a tad under 5MB of
RAM and it takes me somewhere between 3-4hours to build the kernel.  On
my girlfriend's machine, a 486/33 w/8MB RAM, it takes under 10
minutes.  I'd like to get an idea of where I could improve
performance.

Thanks,
Brendan
-- 
Brendan B. Boerner		Phone: 512/346-8380
Internet: bboerner@novell.com	MHS: bboerner@novell
Please use ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ if replying by mail.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: fred@sobel.u-strasbg.fr (Frederic PIERRE)
Subject: X386
Reply-To: fred@sobel.u-strasbg.fr (Frederic PIERRE)
Organization: The Internet
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 18:05:47 GMT


	Hello,

	I'm currently trying to find a correct configuration 
	for an ET4000 based video board (2 the MAX). The problem
	seems to be serious since the whole machine becomes
	frozen after I run startx (logged under user1 on a Linux
	0.96c-pl2). I would like to know if somebody experienced
	same kind of crash and how this has been fixed ....
	Another question: how can I do for booting on my hard disk
	when I use the SLS distribution package? I religiously 
	followed the procedure but, at boot time, the system
	says 'wrong partition table'? 

	Config is: 386sx + 4MB + ST151 MFM Disk (3 partitions)
		   + 2 the MAX SVGA.

	Any help will be gratefully accepted.

	Frederic PIERRE
	fred@sobel.u-strasbg.fr


Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: Kevin W. Hammond <hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com>
Subject: Killing background processes on logout
Reply-To: hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com
Organization: The Internet
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 23:37:29 GMT

Ok.  I see everyone is indicating that background processes should not terminate
when the shell that invoked them terminates.  For some silly reason I've based
my "idea" for that thought on Sun's csh that does kill my background programs
when my shell terminates.

My new question would be this:  how do you force the exit of background processes
on csh termination?  I would really swear up and down that nohup was used to keep
the process running, but the general consenus does not seem to support that belief.

-kwh-
-- 
Kevin W. Hammond
hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com

  CASE Engineering * 575 W. Madison #1601 * Chicago, IL 60661 * (312)902-2161
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: tvr@cs.hut.fi (Teemu Rantanen)
Subject: Re: Microsoft Bus mouse works, sorta
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
	<1992Aug31.145211.17434@donau.et.tudelft.nl>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 21:37:23 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.145211.17434@donau.et.tudelft.nl> franky@duteca.et.tudelft.nl (Frank W. ten Wolde) writes:
 >  I did ask this question some time ago on comp.os.linux but now we have
 >  more people interested in the Microsoft Bus Mouse (MBM) I'll try again.

    There should be two working versions already. Mine and the one
    Derrick Cole put together based on your and mine code.

    The only major difference is that on mine version you should
    configure "Microsoft" to Xconfig vs. "Busmouse" on Cole's.

 >  In order to get a better working MBMdriver I'm searching for the 
 >  technical reference guide to the MBM. I don't mean all those books telling
 >  you how to use the MBM on MS-DOS with a mouse driver installed :-)

    What we are still missing is the way to recognize MBM. 


        				Teemu
From: ace3@quads.uchicago.edu (Tony 'LLama' Acero)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: X386 for 8514A - Misc Notes and Problems
Summary: a couple answers
Date: 4 Sep 92 14:49:14 GMT
Reply-To: ace3@midway.uchicago.edu
Followup-To: comp.os.linux
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <1992Sep4.041737.10284@midway.uchicago.edu> I wrote:
>At this point 'startx' brings up X with clock and shell.  If I try to exit
>from the window manager (after closing all the windows) the machine locks
>up tight (ie the NumLock light doesn't even toggle). If I capture std error
>from startx (ie 'startx 2> xerror') xerror contains "xinit: connection to X
>server lost"
>
>Could anyone
>
>1) Tell me how to avoid the lock-ups when exiting
>
Using Ctrl-Alt-Backspace exits the window manager cleanly.  An additional Ctrl-C 
is necessary to get a prompt.  I look forward to being to use 'Exit' from the
menu :-)

>2) Tell me if selection is compatible with X386 (I'll be able to answer
>that one myself pretty soon)
>
No, selection prevents X from accessing the mouse.  Killing selection before
running X and reinstalling afterward seems to work.  But why would you want to
exit X???

>3) Point me to a slightly more detailed guide to setting up X386
>
I found a 4 (!) article FAQ in comp.window.x -- I'm not sure how relevant it is
to my situation, but I'll wade through it anyway.

>
>Many, many thanks,
>
>tony acero

Feel free to elaborate on anything above -- I know HOW to do the things above,
but I don't know WHY they work.  Besides, I don't want it to look like I
talk to myself all the time!

Thanks again,

tony acero
ace3@quads.uchicago.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: ujlh@pool.info.sunyit.edu (James Henrickson)
Subject: Re: 0.97p2
Organization: State University of New York -- Institute of Technology
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 19:51:04 GMT

In article <1992Aug28.123817.20350@csd.uch.gr> kermits@pasifae.cc.uch.gr (Aggelos Keromyths) writes:
>I just tried 0.97p2 from the disk drive and it seemed to me a lot
> slower than 0.97 (no patch at all!!!)....When i did an `ls` it
> started reading the drive,then stopped,then again reading and finally
> presented the directory...but it was SLOW....
>What could be the problem ?
>Aggelos

Low memory?  I had something similar happen on one of my Linux machines when 
I had 2 MB, but it went away after I added more.  I started using that machine
at patch level 2, so I can't say if it happened with virgin 0.97.


-- 
Jim H.
*
* James L. Henrickson
* ujlh@sunyit.edu        "Some day I might have a real .signature!"
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jem@SunSite.unc.edu (Jonathan Magid)
Subject: Re: DISASTER AT MIT!!!!!
Organization: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 00:07:15 GMT

>
>>In article <180toaINNnaa@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A.
>>Lewis) says:
>>>
>>>Someone seriously need to do some housekeeping in the LINUX directories
>>>on TSX-11.MIT.EDU. It's a wreck.
>If you have time, take a look a nic.funet.fi and the Linux directories.
>Everything is up to date there and there aren't any old FAQS or images
>laying around. Too bad it's so far away. We need a closer mirror.
>
Lay off Tytso!  Think how bad it *could* be... It could look
like the Linux part of sunsite. . . 

seriously though, for those who utterly bewildered by the
half assed organization scheme (or lack thereof) i am currently
in the process of totally changing everything, with hopefully
plenty of readme files.  

But if people who use sunsite could do me a favor and tell me
if anything they have downloaded (especially executables) doesn't
work then I would be most appreciative.

(note: sunsite will continue to make uploads immediately available
in incoming, so there will still be no waiting for me to put things
in their "appropriate" place.

jem.

-- 
Jonathan Magid     jem@sunsite.unc.edu       SunSite Administrator
Virtual pizza Delivery (tm)::faxed in 30 cycles or less or you get it
----------------------------------------FREE!!!-----------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: trussell@cwis.unomaha.edu (Tim Russell)
Subject: Problems with extended partitions w/ GCC 2.2.2d compile?
Summary: Ack!
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 00:27:49 GMT

    Is anyone else having a problem with extended partitions (not filesystems)
after compiling their kernel with GCC 2.2.2d?

    I have a boot disk that works great, but after compiling a kernel with
the new GCC, it doesn't seem to be able to read in and define the last logical
partition in the extended partitions on both my SCSI drives.  Here's what I
get:

     Part 1 start 952352 size 339936 end 1292287
       Logical part 21 start 952353 size 20480 end 972832
       Logical part 22 start 972834 size 16384 end 989217
     Unable to read partition table of device 0817

    It then starts up and mounts everything but /usr, since that's what is in
the third logical partition.

    I put printk's in and the message comes from extended_partition in genhd.c.

    This occurs no matter which kernel I compile, from 0.97 to 0.97pl2.

    I'm gonna start tracking it down, but if anyone else has seen this,
please let me know!

--
    Tim Russell                 Omaha, NE              trussell@unomaha.edu
One of the richest men in the world made his billions selling a toy "operating
system" that is more accurately described as a glorified bootstrap loader.
                                                  -- Phil Karn
From: khamer@sumax.seattleu.edu (Little Kenny Hamer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: GWM's MWM emulator
Date: 1 Sep 92 23:32:08 GMT
Organization: Seattle University, Seattle WA

I have installed GWM, and printed out the documantation.  However, I know
nothing about lisp.  If anyone has sucessfully added entries to the MWM
menus to activate xterms, xloads, xmans, etc, please tell me what code you
use to do this.  I would like to use it, but I have no clue where to even
begin.  

Thanks,
          -KEN

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: Kevin W. Hammond <hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com>
Subject: Re:  X Help
Reply-To: hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com
Organization: The Internet
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 13:50:58 GMT

I got X to (sorta) run!

This morning I unpacked xbase1.1.T.Z from tsx-11 and installed it.  After
overcomming a few small problems with Xconfig (thanks for that tip on the
startx >x11.out 2>&1)  I managed to get X to run.  However, it's all out
of sync.  I can see the mouse cursor, I can position the xterm, I can even
execute commands in it.  But the desktop takes up only about 3/4 of my
screen (centered, of course) and is very much out of sync.  The colors even
"fade in and out" in a nice cycle (pretty, but not very useable :-)

I assume it has to do with either (or both of) a) the clocks settings or
b) the sync stuff for the monitor.  Since I did get X "up", does this mean
it will work with my card??  In reading the vga.tutorial, they mention the
clocks.exe program.  Where in the world can I get my hands on this?  Do
you have any ideas where I should (can) go from here.

I'm excited (and I think close!)  Maybe ... just maybe ... I might get X
running after all!

Your help is appreciated!!

-kwh-
-- 
Kevin W. Hammond
hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com

                               "99.9% DOS Free"

  CASE Engineering * 575 W. Madison #1601 * Chicago, IL 60661 * (312)902-2161
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: bjones@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (William A Jones)
Subject: Has anyone compiled a GNUPLOT v3.2 that runs under GCC2.2.2d?
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 22:20:50 GMT

The subject line pretty much says it all.  I have been trying to compile
GNUPLOT version 3.2 under linux 0.97pl1, X11v1.1, and GCC2.2.2d.  After
about three hours of struggling I finally managed to run the make without
problems.  I installed the binaries and tested the program.

I "set term x11," and tried a "plot sin(x)."  No plot.  In fact, all I
got was a message at the gnuplot> prompt saying "/lib/libc.so.2.2".  I
then tried "set term latex" received the message "broken pipe" and was
returned to the bash prompt.

If anyone has gotten this to compile I would like to hear what you did.
I have already applied the linux patches to the makefile (since the patches
are designed for version 3.0, I think, they do not patch the rest of the files
-- and no I do not want to run version 3.0, it is missing useful commands
such as "no hidden3d") and used the supplied linux.trm.

Bill

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: bjl@loki.research.ptt.nl (Ben Lippolt)
Subject: Re: Swap files versus swap partitions
Reply-To: B.J.Lippolt@research.ptt.nl
Organization: PTT Research
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 07:45:48 GMT

wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Lars Wirzenius) writes:

>What reasons are there to prefer swap partitions instead of swap files? 
>I have the impression that a partition may be a bit faster, but how much
>is this?  5% or 50%?  As far as I have been able to figure out, there is
>no other advantage, and the flexibility of swap files (_much_ easier to
>change the size if you have to) means that perhaps it would be better to
>use swap files by default, especially at the beginning and until one has
>some experience of how much swap space one actually needs.  After that,
>if the speed difference is big enough, one can change the partitioning
>and create a swap partition that is big enough and not overly big (does
>anybody really need 12 MB swap space on a 4 MB machine, or is it that
>big just to be certain?).

One of the nice features of SunOS is that you can create an 'empty'
swap-file (which 'mkfile -n'). The file 'grows' on demand. This way
you can easily see how much swap you really use. Of course, this also
means that your file system can fill up mysteriously :-).


Ben Lippolt.
From: ujlh@pool.info.sunyit.edu (James Henrickson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Benchmarking under Linux (was Re: New 486 Suggestions?
Date: 2 Sep 92 17:54:17 GMT
Organization: State University of New York -- Institute of Technology

In article <1992Aug31.210041.21832@novell.com> bboerner@novell.com (Brendan B. Boerner) writes:
>>In article <pdhatchm.715057547@syzygy> of comp.os.linux,
>> In my experience with Linux a faster CPU is a BIG advantage.
>> 
>> Someone preveously mentioned it taking a 486-33 12 minutes to do a
>> "make clean ; make dep ; make".
>> 
>> My 486-50 does this in just over 4 mins.
>
>This has me wondering: does anyone have any benchmarking or performance
>metric programs for Linux?  I've got a 386/16Mhz w/a tad under 5MB of
>RAM and it takes me somewhere between 3-4hours to build the kernel.  On
>my girlfriend's machine, a 486/33 w/8MB RAM, it takes under 10
>minutes.  I'd like to get an idea of where I could improve
>performance.
>
>Thanks,
>Brendan
>-- 
>Brendan B. Boerner		Phone: 512/346-8380
>Internet: bboerner@novell.com	MHS: bboerner@novell
>Please use ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ if replying by mail.

This is an obvious answer, but...

Kernel compilation times depend on several things: disk speed, amount of
RAM, and processor speed.  For starters, you are probably swapping with
5 MB of RAM, and a slow disk will compound the problem.  A slow processor
doesn't help, either.  I haven't tried a kernel rebuild on my 386SX-25 yet,
but I shouldn't have many complaints.  It has 8 MB of RAM and the disk has
a 16 or 18 ms (don't remember) access time.  I am also using a swap partition,
which is faster than a swap file.  Oh, and another thing:  the drive is
an IDE.  I have read (but can't confirm) that the current SCSI drivers
are slower.

On my 386DX-33, I noticed a significant speed-up when I increased the RAM
from 4 MB to 8 MB.  I believe the buffers help, too, since reloading gcc
is a lot snappier.  :-)


-- 
Jim H.
*
* James L. Henrickson
* ujlh@sunyit.edu        "Some day I might have a real .signature!"
From: card@masi.ibp.fr (Remy CARD)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: GNU shell utils 1.7: date(1) dumps core (with easy solution:)
Date: 3 Sep 92 13:51:18 GMT
Organization: Laboratoire MASI - Universite Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris - France

In article <9209013094@gandalf.moria> u31b3hs@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Michael Haardt) writes:
>I have just installed the GNU shell utilities 1.7 on Linux 0.96c-pl1,
>using GCC 2.2.2.  They compile on first try without changes, but the
>first program I tried crashed: "date"
>
>The fix is simple, after the configure run just add -DHAVE_TZNAME.
>Otherwise, a function char *timezone() is used, and in Linux,
>timezone is a long int variable!
>
>People who are interested in it may improve configure (or Linux), I
>don't have the time for it.

	In fact, the fix to configure is pretty small.  configure tries
to compile a program defining 'extern char **tzname' and gcc complains
because tzname is declared as 'extern char *tzname[]' so configure assumes
that tzname does not exist in Linux.

	You can apply this patch to correct configure :

*** configure.old	Thu Sep  3 15:44:35 1992
--- configure	Thu Sep  3 15:44:47 1992
***************
*** 606,612 ****
  echo checking for tzname
  echo "#include <time.h>
  #ifndef tzname /* For SGI.  */
! extern char **tzname;
  #endif
  main() { exit(0); } t() { atoi(*tzname); }" > conftest.c
  if eval $compile; then
--- 606,612 ----
  echo checking for tzname
  echo "#include <time.h>
  #ifndef tzname /* For SGI.  */
! extern char *tzname[];
  #endif
  main() { exit(0); } t() { atoi(*tzname); }" > conftest.c
  if eval $compile; then

>
>Michael


	Remy
--

	Remy Card
	card@masi.ibp.fr
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: djr48312@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (X X)
Subject: What Video Cards supported
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 23:39:49 GMT

I am about to install Linux to the HD after playing with it as much as
you can on floppy.  I want to know exactly what video cards are supported.
I would possibly get a ET-4000 based card.


Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: c-amb@math.utah.edu (Mark B. Alston)
Subject: Re: ATI graphics ULTRA? Will it work?
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 02:03:49 GMT
Organization: Department of Mathematics, University of Utah

I'm also using X-windows with the ATI graphics ultra.  I am *amazed* it was incredibly simple to install and so far, 2 hours, I havn't had any problems.
THANKS MARTIN!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
--------------------------------------------------------
  Mark Alston        
  c-amb@math.utah.edu
       
       It is not just a riot of blots and blurs and 
      disjointed jottings linked by spurts of speed...
      it only looks as like it as damn it.
       
                          James Joyce, Finnegans Wake
---------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: healyzh@iat.holonet.net (Zane H. Healy)
Subject: Re: Major Device number for Sound Blaster
Organization: HoloNet (BBS: 510-704-1058)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 21:28:46 GMT

healyzh@iat.holonet.net (Zane H. Healy) writes:
: I have applied the patches for SoundBlaster support and as far as I can
: tell it work's, BUT I need the MajorDevice number.  The doc'sonly seem to
: give the minor device numbers.  Also is it block or character?
: 
:       Thanks,
:            Zane
: 
In case anyone is wondering it is 14, and can be changed in soundcard.c

                      Zane
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com (Kevin W. Hammond)
Subject: Latest GCC and Linux versions
Reply-To: hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com (Kevin W. Hammond)
Organization: The Internet
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 02:59:17 GMT

What is the latest *working* combination of Linux source (including patches)
and GCC, and where can they be located?

-kwh-
-- 
Kevin W. Hammond
hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com

  CASE Engineering * 575 W. Madison #1601 * Chicago, IL 60661 * (312)902-2161
From: swaliff@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Steve Aliff)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: QIC 40 / QIC 80 ?
Date: 4 Sep 92 20:40:38 GMT
Organization: The Great Beyond

In article <1992Sep04.152437.22327@kithrup.COM> dje@cygnus.com (Doug Evans) writes:
...
>
>CMS wrote a device driver for SCO Unix and Xenix and it runs fine for me
>in both single user mode and full multitasking mode.
>

Is there a charge for it, or is it like their other software and
available on their BBS?
-- 
Steve Aliff (swaliff@afterlife.ncsc.mil [144.51.1.1])
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Werner Almesberger)
Subject: Re: linux 0.97 rootimage .1, some problems
Keywords: linux, mount, compress, 0.97.1
Organization: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, CH
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 18:16:55 GMT

In article <688@svcs1.UUCP> slix@svcs1.UUCP (Bill Miller) writes:
> I get a "no bmap support."  Exactly what does this mean?

This means, that no mapping of file blocks to disk blocks is possible (*)
and that therefore the bmap function is not available. The kernel uses
bmap internally for things like demand-paging, swapping, etc. The only
user-mode application that uses bmap is LILO.

Thus, not having bmap support only means that you can't run executables
from that FS, that you can't put a swap file on it and that no LILO boot
files can reside there.

(*) This happens whenever the disk data area starts at an odd sector or
    the cluster size is not a multiple of 1 kB.

- Werner
-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
  / Werner Almesberger, ETH Zuerich, CH      almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch /
 / IFW A44  Tel. +41 1 254 7213                 almesberger@rzvax.ethz.ch /
/_BITNET:_ALMESBER@CZHETH5A__HEPNET/CHADNET:_[20579::]57414::ALMESBERGER_/
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: rafal@utstat.uucp (Rafal Kustra (summer student))
Subject: Re: ps for 0.97pl2
Organization: University of Toronto, Dept. of Statistics
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 07:47:20 GMT

In article <1992Aug29.065940.1257@athena.mit.edu> hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com (Kevin W. Hammond) writes:
>I FTP'd ps-0.97 from tsx-11 and I cannot get it to compile under 0.97pl2.
>The first error I received was that stddef.h did not exist in /usr/include.
>I took the cheap way out and sym linked it to /usr/include/linux/stddef.h
>I then got errors about some LIBRARY_n defines not defined.
>
>Is there are working version of ps for 0.97pl2 out there some where or have
>I botched the compile job with the version I downloaded??
>
>-kwh-
>-- 
>Kevin W. Hammond
>hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com
>
On the related note. I've got the same package To try to
use it for .97pl1. Could not compile it but package
contains binaries. Ps and top work, but the rest doesn't.
(free says sumething like _paging_pages not defined).
Can someone point me to good free for 0.97pl1.

				Rafal.

>  CASE Engineering * 575 W. Madison #1601 * Chicago, IL 60661 * (312)902-2161


-- 
/|| Numbers exist only in our minds. There is no physical entity that
 ||_is_ number 1. If there were, 1 would be in a place of honor in 
 || some great museum of science, and past it would file a steady
==== stream of mathematicians gazing at 1 in wonder and awe.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: stewart@wimsey.bc.ca (Jim Stewart)
Subject: Re: Compiling X/Motif Apps
Organization: Wimsey 
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 04:03:08 GMT

In article <AecFfIy00Vp3R6VUMf@andrew.cmu.edu> cd2a+@andrew.cmu.edu (Court Demas) writes:
>
>	I'd like to start compiling X and Motif apps on my Linux system, but I
>haven't been able to find any of the include files or libs anywhere. 
>Can I just d/l the source and compile it myself or something?  Is it
>that difficult?  I'm sure somebody's done this before..
>

The archive xprog.1.1.T.Z on tsx-11.mit.edu /pub/linux/packages/x11v1.1 has
the libraries for gcc 2.2.2 (not 2.2.2d) as wella s the include files.  If
you fine a ftp site with Motif Source available let eveyone know :-) ...
Motif costs money, and is not likely to show  up under linux soon :-( ...

js  who_is_beginning_to_LIKE_the_Athena_widgets
 
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jharvey@csulx.weber.edu (Just me)
Subject: Wang X
Organization: Weber State University, Ogden Utah
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 92 23:07:02 GMT

One more time, is anyone out there on a Wang VGA monitor
running X-windows???????????????


jharvey@csulx.weber.edu