HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: Sunday observations...
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 00:36:32 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.002719.3780@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:

>A few observations from the safety of the family room sofa:

>*  I bet if you looked into it closely enough you'd find that NFL
>officials buy a lot of expensive gifts for friends and family after
>they work a 9er game.

I bet if we looked into Gordon's back yard we'd find all sorts of
vines that produce some very sour fruit...

>*  Looking forward to reading all the Aikman defenders' posts this week.
>Let's see:  He threw away a chance to put Washington away, then he fumbled
>away the opportunity to just run out the clock, then he manages to find
>someone to sack him to prevent the comeback.  Oh yes, he's definately the
>QB of the future - the opponents future.

I hope you're equally as harsh on Michael Irvin and Emmitt Smith -- they
both fumbled at critical times in the 4th quarter.

>*  Singletary should be hired as the next Bear head coach.  The team played
>for him like they never played for Ditka.

Maybe you can convince the Bowboys to trade for Bubby Brister -- then
you'll really have something to grouse about.
-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jbhuber@iastate.edu (Joseph B Huber)
Subject: Re: Vikes cannot hope for a wild card.
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 22:47:12 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.212513.13996@bmw.mayo.edu> bergerson@mayo.edu writes:
>->The Vikes certainly didn't deserve it, right?
>->
>->The rest is history.
>->
>->-- 
>->                                          Edward Lor
>->                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
>Don't post until you know the whole story, know-nothing-fans!!!!!
>

Calm down, go back, and re-read Ed's post, keeping in mind that humans have
been known to use sarcasm on occasion.

-- 
Joe Huber 
(jbhuber@iastate.edu)        | Capt. James T. Kirk on the 2nd law of thermo: 
Dept. of Mech. Egr.          |  "It's not a hundred percent efficient,
Iowa State University        |   but nothing ever is."
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 00:30:15 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The Play of the Day (Skins/Dallas)
Keywords: Lucky Break! Aikman
Date: 14 Dec 92 20:18:58 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Pacific * Bell

In article <1992Dec14.161920.13389@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes:
>In article <13DEC199223525873@hades.stsci.edu> merrill@hades.stsci.edu (Clark) writes:
>>I thought that  Dallas  outplayed the Redskins except for the four
>>turnovers!  Turnovers can make easily turn a  win into a loss.  That is what
>>killed the Redskins against the Cards.
>Turnovers are part of the game, the MOST DAMAGING PART. So you can't
>say that "Dallas outplayed the Skins except the turnovers". 
>It's more appropriate to say that "The Skins vastly outplayed Dallas except
>the meaningless yards".
>
>-- 
>                                          Edward Lor
>                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
>                                          

AIN'T that the truth! Yes, HOmey thinks so! :-)
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
	"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
  is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 00:50:09 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pboxrud@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul D Boxrud)
Subject: Re: all SB winner
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:44:52 GMT

Yes, but they also lost to the Dolphins in their undefeated season of 1972.  
(actually I guess the Super Bowl was in 1973, but you get the point.)

Paul
From: operbwt@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu(Barry Trottier)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Cost of Season Tickets?
Date: 16 Dec 1992 06:15:05 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
Reply-To: operbwt@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: g310b6.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

I notice that many of the readers/posters of r.s.f.p are season ticket holders  
of their favorite teams.

I was wondering what the cost of season tickets is.  (If there is a distinction  
between teams, I would like to know that, and I would also like to know the  
prices for the "cheap" seats and the better seats.)

Thanks in advance!

-------
Go Niners!
Go Elway!

Barry Trottier
e-mail:  operbwt@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 08:50:08 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: stamber@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Kevin L. Stamber)
Subject: Re: Physics 101
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:24:20 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.180809.18505@bnr.ca>, reams@crchh462.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Cary Reams) writes:
> |> 
> |> The Cowboys lost.  They admitted it (At least Troy did).
> |> 
> |> Dallas fans, repeat after me:  MY TEAM LOST.
> Yep.
> |>                                THEY LOST BEFORE.
> Many times.
> |>                                THEY WILL LOSE AGAIN.
> Probably.
> |> 
> |> Now then, don't you feel better?
> No.
> 
> |> 
> |> Next case...
> but judge.........
> |> 
> -- 
> Cary W Reams | sneakers.ksh <"cary w. reams"
> NT/BNR/MTXVO | TOO MANY SECRETS:> wry as a merc.   
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> My opinions are not necessarily shared by Northern Telecom/BNR. 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------

Judge, jury and executioner...
Yep, that's me.
Unfortunately, as Troy Aikman siad in a postgame interview:

     "We shot ourselves in the foot today."

Somebody better call Jack Kevorkian quick....

Have a happy non-denominational, non-sectarian, early-winter holiday.

Kevin Stamber
Purdue University

COWHER POWER!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 19:40:07 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: swenson.rtsg.mot.com (R. Scott Swenson)
Subject: Re: non-kickers kicking (was Re: Kickers doing double duty as punters)
Organization: Motorola
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:18:23 GMT

What about the Bears and their backup until 2 years ago.  It was DT Steve 
"Mongo" McMichael.  I think he kicked 2 or 3 during his career
From: v130pwbq@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: AFC EAST (Dolphins 1 st.. very likely) Easy Easy Easy
Date: 12 Dec 92 03:22:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <Bz42vs.3Bv@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes...
>In article <Bz0wAG.HpF@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v130pwbq@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes...
>>In article <Bz0Ju5.BzB@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes...
>>>In article <Byyx1H.6K2@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v130pwbq@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes...
>>>>In article <ByyCq2.H7A@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes...
>>>>>In article <BywEJ0.13J@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v130pwbq@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes...
> 
>I guess, that you being a dolphin fan hasn't noticed how poorly your team
>has played.  Lost 5 of last 7, Eric!  Why would you agree with me, you're
>a dolphin fan.  When is the last time a dolphin fan agreed with a Bills
>fan.  God are you stupid.  Your team lost to the Colts and the Jets.
>I guess you have nothing to say about being sweeped by the Jets this
>year, do you Eric?
> 
On the contrary I have already mentioned numerous times on this newsgroup that
I thought the Dolphins should be playing better. As for agreeing with you, the
only thing I agree with you is that the Bills aren't going to win the division.
If you really believed that they were going to then you would have taken the 
Bet! 

The only one looking stupid is you! Believe it or not but the Bills also lost
to the Colts and the Jets back to back. And as for being swept by the Jets,
that would be kinda difficult since the Dolphins have only played them once 
this year!

> 
>> 
>>So AGAIN I give you the opportunity to back up your own words. "IF" you TRULY
>>believe that your Bills will win the division title then take the BET.
>>Otherwise anything you post from here on in will be swept aside as mere static
>>with no substance!!!
> 

>Seems to me that you were the one that was saying that YOUR Dolphins were 
>going 16-0.

>Bruce, a Bills fan. (who is afraid to take the BET)

Honestly I don't see where you come up with these things. Neither I nor any 
other Dolphin fan said or gave the impression that we thought our team was 
going to go undefeated. Although, unlike yourself, I do believe that MY team 
will take the AFC East!!!
    _____________________________________________________________________
   |   Miami Dolphins and Hurricanes:        * Eric Orologio " Dr. O"    |
   |   Two of the Best teams in Football!    * V130pwbq @ubvms           |
   |_____________________________________________________________________|
From: aa05@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ABDULMALIK A. ALHUSSEINI)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The Play of the Day (Skins/Dallas)
Date: 16 Dec 92 00:12:49 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1gi918INNk57@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.e
du (Timothy B. Reynolds) writes:
>In article <douthit.724344638@scofflaw> douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit) wri
tes:
>>merrill@hades.stsci.edu (Clark) writes:
>
>[stuff deleted]
>
> >I think Emmit would have been ruled down.  Emmit also admitted he was
> >pitching the ball.  BUT I STILL DON'T WANT INSTANT REPLAY.
>
> >                     -Ron (Not whinning) D.
>
>I totaly agree, DO NOT BRING BACK REPLAY ! the calls can go either way,
>you win some you lose some, we could all sit and say "the refs cost us
>the Div." but thats BS.
>
>Go Cowboys !!!
>tim
>
You got my vote too, NO FOR INSTANT REPLAY. It didn't help the Cowboys in the
Giants game last year. The replay just kills the intensity of the game.
BTW, I am proud of the Cowboys fans for not whining about this game. This loss
is not crucial given that the cowboys win at least one more game. The Niners
will probably beat both Tampa and Detroit, so Dallas wouldn't win home field
anyway. The loss may turn out to be a blessing. It may help the Cowboys to
refocus and know that they are not the favorite in case they play the Niners.

Malik..... Go Cowboys......
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 08:20:09 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes)
Subject: Re: Eagles win in OT
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:49:30 GMT

In article <101903@netnews.upenn.edu>, satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
> the Eagles scored over 400+ yards on offense.

466-yards (190-rushing, 276-passing) to be exact.

> the Seahawks only over 100+

87-yards (63-rushing, 24-passing) to be exact.

> However:
> 	Randall got sacked a record 10 times (yeah yeah he can read
> 	defenses... NOT!  every time the Hawks used the Blitz it was
> 	sack time).

Typical Randall basher.  Hasn't got a clue.

If Randall can't read defenses, how did he manage to throw for well
over 3000-yards and 30-TDs in 1990?  How did he manage to be the
NFL's top rated passer early in the season?  How did he throw for
365-yards against a very good Seattle Seahawk defense?

When a QB is blitzed, not only does he have to read it, but the backs
have to read it as well.  One of them has to pick up the block.  Also
the receivers have to read the blitz.  The hot receiver has to break
off his initial pattern and go to the area left unoccupied by the
blitzing defenseman.  A couple times Randall held onto the ball too
long.  A couple times either Herschel or Heath Sherman didn't pick up
the block.  A couple other times neither Barnett nor Williams broke off
their initial pattern.  It was a combination of things not just Randall,
as you would love to think.

> 	Over 150+ yrds in penalties.  I pity Vai Sekahema... every time
> 	he got a decent return on a kickoff or a punt, it was called
> 	back for... "illegal block in the back".

191-yards in penalties to be exact.  And that doesn't include the
yardage lost on some of those big returns.

> Overtime!  Neither offense could get anything done.  Every time the Eagles
> O threatened, they were denied by Cortez, Porter and Co.  With less than
> 2 minutes left in overtime, Keith Byars makes what would
> have been a busted play into a gain to the Seahawks 30 yard.

A busted play?  If you're going to report on the Eagles games try
to become a little more familiar with their gameplans.  On some
pass patterns with Byars at TE he remains on the line to block.  If
protection breaks down, Byars releases to the middle of the field as
a safety valve for Randall to unload the ball.  They've been doing
that now ever since Byars recovered from his broken right hand.  You
remember the first time they worked it don't you?  C'mon, it was
against your team.   Randall shotput the ball to Byars who turned and
rambled 41-yards for a TD to put the Eagles ahead 27-20 after they
trailed 20-6 early in the game:-).

> Man, if those Hawks only had some sort of an offense, they'd be incredible!

To me it looks like all they need is a quality QB.


E-A-G-L-E-S

Joe Dakes
AT&T Microelectronics
555 Union Boulevard
Allentown, PA  18103
alux1!jmd

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro