HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: wyder@amiga.physik.unizh.ch (Peter Wyder)
Subject: SQ IV - help
Organization: ICU - University of Zurich, Dept. of Computer Science
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 16:03:42 GMT

hi all.....

i have a little problem...i recently bought the Sierra game SpaceQuest IV on
some king of "second-hand-computer-market", that means i bought just the disks
of the game...no manual, no bokk...just the disks...
so..the chap who sold me the disks said, that there are no copy-protection-
question in the game....and i tried to check this out be statring the game
there and i came without problems into tha game and you act normally...so i
bought the game.......but ...those of you who have the game will grin....
there is a copy-protection, but it appears jst after a few game actions,
precisely when i trie to activate the time pod...

so...since i have no namual..:-(...

so the please is...if a good soul out there would be so nice and copy (or write
me) the copy-protection codes...

thanx ...peter wyder

--
*******************************************************************************
*               |   I stayed up all night playing poker with tarot cards.     *
*  Peter Wyder  |   I got a full house and four people died.                  *
*  aka          |           -- Steven Wright                                  *
*  Excalibur    |_____________________________________________________________*
*                                                                             *
*  at University of Zurich              wyder@avalon.physik.unizh.ch          *
*  CH-8006  Zurich                      wyder@amiga.physik.unizh.ch           *
*                                   excalibur@ezinfo.vmsmail.ethz.ch          *
*  Switzerland                       maverick@idrz07.ethz.ch                  *
*  ~~~~~~~~~~~~                         wyder@imp.ch                          *
*                                      albion@cultnet.ch                      *
*******************************************************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 4 Jan 1993 09:33:00 CST
From:         Rolando Recometa <$W$LB4P@LUCCPUA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Siskel and Ebert

Who isn't a critic? Let him cast the first stone!
                                                 Rolando
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:48:00 EST
From:         "Mike.Simmons" <20676MES@MSU.BITNET>
Subject:      SQ IV - help

Peter Wyder / Excalibur
I'm not sure the connection to cinema that your computer software message has,
however, I'm sure that what you are requesting and the means by which you
acquired the software game is highly illegal in the United States (and
elsewhere). I'm not passing judgement but if I were you I would exercise
caution in this endeavour!
Mike
MSU.

Copyright infringement is very serious business!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 5 Jan 1993 11:05:49 -0600
From:         CDOMS@UMKCVAX1.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Forever Young

Alex you ask:

>Oh, yeah, who was the guy who plays the modern scientists?  I know he's
>the same fellow who was in TERMINATOR 2 & BROTHER FROM ANOTHER PLANET, but
>what else has he done?

The actor is Joe Morton.  Other screen credits are _Alone in the Neon
Jungle, City of Hope, Corossroads, Taps

Crossroads and Trouble in Mind  (Sorry about the garbage online)

Carol Doms
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 5 Jan 1993 09:14:00 CST
From:         Rolando Recometa <$W$LB4P@LUCCPUA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: X'mas movies

Michael,
      No way! What I meant within the context of that paragraph was
that her performance underlined the lack of good female roles last
year. A Few Good Men, for some unknown reason, is getting a lot of
Oscar buzz, but not once was Demi Moore mentioned as a possible
contender. The role, itself, seems originally written for a man(on stage
it was). Added to that is Demi's inability to add any kind of nuance or
depth to the character.
                                                 Rolando
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 4 Jan 1993 14:17:00 CST
From:         Rolando Recometa <$W$LB4P@LUCCPUA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Don and Hairdresser's

Don,
   Hairdresser's Husband was directed by Patrice Leconte, who also
gave us Monsieur Hire, another great film. "Husband" is about a man
whose fixation on a hairdresser while growing up leads him to marry
one. It's a deliriously romantic and erotic tragicomedy. Not out on
video yet but worth waiting for.
                                                 Rolando
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 13:51:00 CST
From:         Rolando Recometa <$W$LB4P@LUCCPUA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Chaplin

Bill,
    I agree with you, for the most part. Robert Downey, Jr. is the
best thing. His mimicry of Chaplin's pantomime is very impressive.
It's in the biographical sections that I find him lacking. Most
of the blame has to go to screenwriter Boyd's Dynasty-like script.
And he's also not helped by director Attenborough's conventionally
dull approach. As for the supporting performances, except for the
character of Chaplin's mother, everyone else is stripped of character
shadings. Kevin Kline and Diane Lane manage to come alive through sheer
charisma and energy. There should have been more of Chaplin's artistry
and less of his womanizing. Despite Downey's performance, I can't quite
recommend Chaplin. You're better off watching any of his films.
                                                   Rolando
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 4 Jan 1993 14:43:44 -0500
From:         Ens Alexander W Ellermann <ellerman@NORFOLK.NADN.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Peter's Friends Question

I PETER'S FRIENDS going into wide release anytime soon or will
I have to drive into the city (ack!)?
                                              Thanks,
                                                   Alex
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 5 Jan 1993 13:45:18 -0600
Reply-To:     lkrevit@bite.db.uth.tmc.edu
From:         lkrevit@BITE.DB.UTH.TMC.EDU
Subject:      Re: S&E, and The Crying Game

    SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT

    Please DO NOT READ THE FOLLOWING if you have NOT yet seen
    _Crying Game_. This message will really spoil things for you!



    <I have a question about the movie that involves a *SPOILER*.  If you've
    <already seen the movie, please read on...
    <*
    <*WARNING:  SPOILER BELOW*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*********SPOILER FOLLOWS***********
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <*
    <SPOILER
    <What can people tell me about Jaye Davidson (sp?), the actor who plays Dil?
    < I thought s/he did an outstanding job.  Does anyone know what else s/he's
    <done?  Understandably, the press hasn't been running features on Davidson
    <because to do so would give away part of the surprise.  If you have any
    <info on Davidson, please reply, with a *SPOILER* alert!   Thanks.

    <Penny Ward
    <penny_ward@unc.edu


Penny:

I read (in _Premiere_ or _Film Comment_) that Jordan interviewed hundreds
of prospective Dils throughout London and other cities, looking for the
perfect one. And he found what he was looking for in Jaye Davidson, didn't
he? Jaye is, if I recall, a lip-sync artist at a bar in one of the cities
Jordan visited--he was bowled over by the performance and offered him the
part.

An aside: I found myself referring to Jaye Davidson after seeing the film
exclusively as "her."  Obviously my reaction to the role was one of belief
in Dil's fantasy. Now, however, I seem to vacillate (notice the pronouns
above). An interesting comment on gender and the movies, I guess. . .

Ciao.

Leah
From: DU013@OASIS.CALPOLY.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Subject: DEEP SPACE NINE
Date: 7 Jan 93 15:43:40 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
              7 Jan 1993 07:21:00 EST from "Mike.Simmons" <20676MES@MSU.BITNET>

From:  Mary Shaffer
       Assistant to the Vice President
       Information Systems
I missed the premiere episode in our area and I don't know yet it there
are any plans to rebroadcast it or if it will air locally on another channel.
If I can't see/tape it locally, I'd really appreciate it if someone (Mike
or Ellen?) could send me a copy. I'll let you know next week if I need one.

Thanks,
Mary
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 7 Jan 1993 09:23:14 -0600
From:         JACKSOSM@VUCTRVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: DEEP SPACE NINE

Mike,

I'll look for the rebroadcast in my area.  Thanks for your kind offer of
assistance.

j-man
    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: State University of New York, Stony Brook
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: in%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 6 Jan 1993 11:26:00 -0500
From:         MDESCHUYTENE@SBCCMAIL.BITNET
Subject:      Re: MILITARY CONFUSION

               State University of New York at Stony Brook
                       Stony Brook, NY 11794-8121

                                            Michel Deschuyteneer
                                            Department of Neurology, HSC
                                            516 444-1469
                                            06-Jan-1993 10:41am EST
FROM:  MDESCHUYTENEER
TO:    LYLE B SMYTHERS                      ( _CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET )

SUBJECT: RE: MILITARY CONFUSION

    Lyle,

    JAG is for Judge Advocate General, an office providing legal services
    for Navy personnel. According to the colleague who provided me with the
    answer (he used to be in the Navy), everyone knows the JAG office but
    many don't know what the acronym is for. And even though the Marines
    are a separate branch of the military, they are part of the Department
    of the Navy from which they depend for certain services, including JAG.

    As for the second part of your posting: well, aircraft carriers are
    boats, aren't they? ;-)
    There was an interesting article about the Top Gun in one of the first
    issues of Air & Space, the magazine published by Air &Space
    Smithsonian. Its cover had a picture of Top Gun pilots with the woman
    whose Kelly McGillis character was based on.

    MICHEL
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 6 Jan 1993 14:39:27 CST
From:         C444307@MIZZOU1.BITNET
Subject:      A Few Good Men

I finally saw this and enjoyed it very much.
But I gotta say, Demi Moore's character (or perhaps
Demi Moore) was so completely annoying, it almost
ruined a very entertaining movie for me.
If Reiner wanted me to experience the type of
aggravation Cruise went through with her, he
was highly successful.

I kept catching myself thinking, why did she
have to be in this movie.

The more I think about it, the more weaknesses
I seem to come up with about the film (maybe I
should quit thinking about it).  I felt this same
way after I saw _Backdraft_;  loved it walking out
of the theater, and a few days later had a hundred
things I didn't like about it.

Anyway back to _AFGM_.  I think the ethical
implications that the film underscores
(i.e., the cost in terms of humaninty of having
a secured nation).  And having the implications
embodied in the extremely powerful Jack Nicholson (sp?)
made for a highly engaging film.

Just some thoughts

Joe Daus  U of MO-Columba
C444307@MIZZOU1.BITNET
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 7 Jan 1993 10:48:00 CST
From:         Rolando Recometa <$W$LB4P@LUCCPUA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Michael and Hoffa

Michael,
      It surprised me too after I made the lists to see two Nicholson
films in my worst list. He's one of my favorites. Hoffa's biggest flaw
is that you never get a sense of what made Hoffa tick, what drove him
to become a passionate teamster leader. All you see is Nicholson huffing
and puffing and blaring out Mamet-isms. I was bored because I didn't
care.
                                                    Rolando
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 4 Jan 1993 14:28:52 -0400
From:         Don McCreary <surak@PX1.STFX.CA>
Subject: Re: X'mas movies

Rolando or anyone else in the know: what is the HAIRDRESSER'S HUSBAND
about and who did it?  I think Rolando mentioned it in the Fall, but
can someone fill me in a little more on this one.

Don
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Encoding: 21 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 6 Jan 1993 09:05:00 EST
From:         AYC3@NCH08A.EM.CDC.GOV
Subject:      Flirting: Two thumbs (mine) up

Did any of you see the movie FLIRTING?  I'd love to hear what you thought
about it.

I saw it last night and it was great.  It's set in 2 Australian boarding
schools circa 1965 and it's your basic first love/coming of age story, but
with many significant differences from what this encapsulation usually
conjures up.  The adults were NOT all idiots and sadists, the students were
for the most part extremely likable, and the humor was simultaneously
adolescent and satirical (there is probably a more appropriate word, but I
can't think of it now).  The primary romance itself was between a
dorky-looking, Sartre-loving white boy and a very pretty, also-Sartre-loving
Ugandan girl (the only black girl in her school).  The nice (but not
"over-sugared") mood it left me with reminded me a lot of movies like
Gregory's Girl.  Unfortunately, I can't recall any American "teenybopper"
movies that have the same effect, so maybe someone else can think of one.
BTW, an 18-ish Nicole Kidman was in it (it was made in 1987 I think), and I
was surprised at what a good job she did playing one of the older girls in
the school.

--Anjani
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 4 Jan 1993 13:33:12 -0400
From:         Don McCreary <surak@PX1.STFX.CA>
Subject:      back from London

Hi all on Cinema-L.  I just got back from 3 weeks in London and I saw some
good films: Peters Friends, Simple Men, and Glengary Glenross.  All three were
great, although just by chance, BBC2 ran The Big Chill the night before I saw
Peter's Friends and it made PF look like 'The British Big Chill.'  Emma
Thompson was great in this one -- she plays a very eccentric woman who is
desparate to find a partner but doesn't want to think of herself that way.
Simple Men is the latest from Hal Hartley and is as quirky as his other films.

All in all, film prices in London are terrible (about $12 Canadian/$10 US)
for most performances, although at many cinemas, if you catch a matinee
the price is reduced somewhat.

I found out that British television has a tonne of good films on over the
holidays -- everything from Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown to
Monty Python and the Holy Grail.  We ended up taping more than we had the
time to watch.

Happy New Year all,
Don

P.S.  I almost made it to see Night on Earth, but bomb scares crippled the
Underground so I was too late.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 5 Jan 1993 13:49:12 -0600
Reply-To:     lkrevit@bite.db.uth.tmc.edu
From:         lkrevit@BITE.DB.UTH.TMC.EDU
Subject:      Re: Peter's Friends Question

    Alex:

    _Peter's Friends_ is playing in Houston; doesn't that usually
    mean "wide release"? I saw it over the holiday and loved it,
    although I was in the minority. My cohorts all thought is was
    a _Big Chill_ ripoff, but I did not react to it that way at
    all. I am a big fan of both Branagh and Thompson and enjoyed
    them and the movie immensely.

    Leah
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: cinema-l@american.edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"cinema-l@american.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 13:59:00 EST
From:         AMBLY@CLUST1.CLEMSON.EDU
Subject:      JFK

I know all have discussed this to town and back because the movie is
almost two year's old.  But I watched JFK for the first time last night
on HBO.  I had avoided watching it because I wanted to be in the just the
right mood to appreciate it, you know deep and introspective, so I would
be prepared to think about what I was watching.  My mood was just right
at about 10 p.m. last night.

Anyway, I really enjoyed it.  It's weird, but I felt the suspense and pace
of the movie, even knowing how it would end.  This is one time when the
(typo) knowing how the moview ended did not spoil it for me.  The cast was
so full of good actors, it almost distracted me from the content -- almost
but not quite.  The camera angles and quick editing made me head spin, but
it was exhilarating, much like the feeling I got as a child when pushed
higher and higher in the swing, scared of falling but wanting to touch the
sky.  A colleague and I agreed that no one could have watched this movie
and not respected the subject matter or the handling of the story.  At time
the southern accents did fall a bit short, particularly the Cajun concoctions
cooked up by Costner and company.  However, they gave it a good try.  (No one
can be Dennis Quaid's accent in BIG EASY)  Sure, Stone did preach a bit much
through Costner's character, but I found myself wanting to believe that stuff
about truth being worth the fight.  I liked this one and more than that, I
believe it influenced my thinking in terms of JFK's assassination.  That's
powerful stuff.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:11:57 EST
From:         RPAT000 <RPAT@SLUMUS.BITNET>
Subject:      Beta Format

My brother has a beta format VCR.  It is quiet old but he's had it a
long time and has many tapes for it.  My mother also has one and they
are able to swap tapes back and forth.  My brother would like to
purchase another beta format VCR.  If anyone has one to sell, would
you please e-mail me direct with your name, and phone number.  I'll
pass it along to my brother and he can call you!  Thanks...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Roxanne Patterson                   Voice: 315-379-5271
     Bitnet: RPAT@SLUMUS.BITNET          FAX:   315-379-5502
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 6 Jan 1993 18:05:48 -0500
From:         S1MBM@ISUVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Ten Best/Ten Worst '92

Rolando, I enjoyed seeing your lists.  I'm glad that you included *A River
Runs Through It* among your ten best, especially since I've been recently
flamed over on rec.arts.movies, not for making such strong claims for the
film, but just for saying I *liked* it.  Actually, I haven't seen enough
films this year to make up such extensive lists, but would have no problem
including *A River* among my ten best.  In its quiet simplicity and beautifully
realized storyline and cinematography, this movie is profoundly affecting
even as it avoids the cliches of Hollywood sentimentality.  No one ever talks
about the fellow who plays Norman for an award nomination, but I thought his
acting superb, as was Skerrit's and that of the fellow who played Paul.

Hoffa is really that bad, eh?  Now you've got me even more curious about it;
I really need to go see it soon.  I cringe, frankly, at the prospect of Jack
being in *two* of the year's very worst films.  I've heard and read many
criticisms of this film, but what are the problems with it that warrant
ranking it among the year's ten worst?

michael mcdonald
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 10:23:53 CST
From:         Carol Slingo <slingo@CASBAH.ACNS.NWU.EDU>
Subject:      Duigan-recommendations

John Duigan is one of Australia's best known directors.  His most
important (as they say) film is ROMERO, with Raul Julia.  FAR
EAST (82) a thriller with Bryan Brown is available on video here,
and WINTER OF OUR DREAMS (a very good drama from the
early 80s) with Judy Davis and Bryan Brown is often on cable--I
think A&E but may be wrong.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 5 Jan 1993 16:43:16 -0600
From:         CDOMS@UMKCVAX1.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Leap of Faith

Spoilers below













Last chance to turn back













Or you can join into the fray!


















Ok, I'm not the bloody kind.  So there is no fray, sorry to disappoint
people.  But I will be discussing some of the comments Michael made
on the movie.

Winger/Neeson relationship.  Interesting point, and if we had another
movie to explore their relationship, we might not find things are
that great in "paradise" of Kansas.  But I guess I can "buy" the
infatuation between these two characters, cause I have seen it in
real life.  If not yourself, haven't you seen a friend or family
member "fall head over heels" with someone that you know they have
absoulutely nothing in common, or are totally wrong for that person?
It usu
I think it was suppose to be idealic.  The scene with the butterflies
reminded me of the "fantasy" scene from _LA STORY_, which is a romantic
view of the world, and what a magical place it is.  At least, for the
duration of the movie, Rustwater is romantic place to Winer's character.
But like I said, we don't know that it would remain that way, if we
followed their story, beyond the end of the movie.

Next item Martin and the ending.  I've read your comment about Martin
"repenting of his hucksterism"  trying to make sure I understood your
view.  Cause you see, I didn't think he did repent, I think he was in
denial, which is why he left.  He knew the "genuine article" like
he said, and could not compete with it.  But instead of converting
he went off to "greener pasters" and probably another con (I don't
know if it would be in the religion field or not).

I thought if Hollyweird actually had more control, they would have
either A) shown ultimate cynical view of religion, by not healing
the boy, or B) Martin's character would have converted and become
a basically decent person.  It didn't happen that way, I thought it
was a better ending, than what could have been.

If I misunderstood any of your previous comments, let me know.  Your
comments?

Carol Doms



P.S.  The only movie I can remember "passionately" getting into the
fray (blood, guts and all) was Alien3 on Sf-lovers group.  The blood
was flying on that discussion group for about 6 weeks.  But thats
another story.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 7 Jan 1993 16:41:01 CST
From:         Dorothy Van Geison <DVANG@NUACVM.ACNS.NWU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: DEEP SPACE NINE

Wait for the vid.
                 Dorothy.

Dorothy Van Geison
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois
DVANG@NUACVM.ACNS.NWU.EDU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU