Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
Subject: Boy, were YOU off the mark, you mark.  (Re: Cutting you up)
From: pmbarlow@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (The Candy Guru)
Date: 2 Oct 92 12:38:12 -0500
Organization: Miami University Academic Computer Service"

In article <1037@cybaswan.UUCP>, ccjames@cybaswan.UUCP (j hussell) writes:
> In previous article, The Whizzkid writes :
>>> Who thinks that the Komet Kid looks a little bit like, in body size, WCW's
>>> Super Invader???  
> 
> The Candy Guru writes:
>>Who here knows that the Comet Kid is really Paul Diamond, formerly Kato?
>>(watches in delight as everybody but j hussell puts his/her hand up.)
> 
> Yes, yes!! Let's put this shit to bed once and for all!!  I know that the
> Komet Kid is Paul Diamond!!!  I know he was Kato!!  I know his real name's
> Thomas Boric!!  Kiss my butt!!!
> I just asked if you thought that he looked Super Invader!!  Don't you peOple
> read the article before you flame???

Two other things... (since that seems to be the popular topic)
1) For what it's worth, no, I don't think KK looks anything like SuperInvader,
except for the fact that they're both extremely dumb gimmicks.  IMHO.

2) Yes, I read the article.  And I could easily ask you the same thing, as
apparently you didn't bother to read my last line of text which read, if I
recall correctly, I'm bored and in a bad mood.  This, for all you newbies,
means that the flame guns will be on for the duration of the post, regardless
of whether I'm right, wrong, or just plain mentally incompetent.  Which one I
was is now beside the point, but I'm sure the Whizzkid (who himself needs a new
gimmick) will say that the latter was, indeed, the case.

   My point is is that I only flame people because I'm bored, or in a bad mood,
or in most situations both.  I NEVER flame somebody because they flamed me
first.  You, on the other hand, seem to be flaming out of spite more than
anything else.

>>> Sssshhhhhhyyyyyeeeeaaaaah, riiiight!!  And monkeys might fly outta my butt!
>>I don't know... do they?
> No, but if you're not careful I'll make sushi outta yours!!

For the record, the Whizzkid has just threatened me with physical violence. 
This is, if nothing else, even more inappropos than swearing on the net. 
Ordinarily, I would demand severe retribution, but I don't want it, because, by
the nature of your flames, you're worth no more of my time than this followup
post warrants.

>>> If Perfect had a braincell, he'd be dangerous, AND I DON'T CARE WHO TELLS
>>> HIM!!!!!
>>If you had a braincell, you'd be dangerous... and I *AM* telling you.
> 
> 1)  I don't give a shit!!

Say, that IS a revelation.

> 2)  Can't you think of anything more original to say back!!

Do I need to?  Remember, I was in a bad mood when I posted this, and people in
bad moods tend not to be great thinkers.

> 3)  Who the hell are *YOU* ????

Oh, is THIS devastating repartee?  Here it is... I'm The Candy Guru, formerly
known on this and all newsgroups as Dan Fielding.  I've been reading this group
for almost a year now.  Yes, I've said and done more controversial things in
the last year than most people have done in their entire lifetimes, and I
refuse to go into detail concerning this.  And I've been wrong before... many
times.  And I'll be wrong again... many times.  And though I don't profess to
be a God, I DO know what the hell I'm talking about.  And, even more
importantly, I don't need to be SOMEBODY like a Sean or a Herb or anybody else
important to open up my flameguns.  If I did, then I'm damn sure I'd be asking
YOU the same question right now.

>>> I'am also wondering if what I hear is true; that some, if not most, of the 
>>> WWF superstars have access to this usenet newsgroup???  I was told by one of
>>> the guys over here!!!
>>> Apparently, the WWF have their own computer dept. so the stars have access to
>>> quite a few things.  Is this true, and if it is, Curt Hennig is an a*****e!!
> 
>>Two other things...
> 
>>(1) Although it IS improper netiquette, if you're going to swear, then SWEAR!  
>     And I think you can get away with the word asshole without causing too much
>     of a fuss.  I mean, if they can say the word "ass" on network TV, surely
>     "asshole" is fine here.
> 
> O.K., you're an asshole!!

Fine by me.

> (Other unintelligent stuff deleted for obvious reasons)

Like what?  My other point?  Because you know I'm right?

>>> Long live the Undertaker (and you know he will!!),
> 
>>Mmmm... nah.  I don't think so...
>>Long live me.  
> 
> No way!!  I think not, my funky friend!!  Oh god, I think I'm gonna hurl ...

Understand me, and understand me well on this one, buckshot.  Although the
women here find me very funky, (which at Miami can mean "attractive") I am
not your friend.  I didn't flame you out of spite, I didn't threaten to injure
you, and I certainly didn't let your flame get under my skin too terrible
much... something which obviously happened to you.

>>The Candy Guru.
> 
> Is this guy a ponce or what!!!
                ^^^^^
Depends... why don't you go into detail and tell everybody what you THINK it
means.  I mean... I know what a Candy Guru is, and so does Dave Scherer...
hell, I only posted the true meaning of it here a couple of months ago...


The Candy Guru, formerly Dan Fielding.
The above comments are my own, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of
Miami University, Chagall Guevara, or Manhattan Criminal Court Part Two.