HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw)
Subject: Re: Male Choice Revisited
Organization: Corporation for Open Systems
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 16:03:31 GMT

In <BzoIxo.6EB@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:

>In article <bob1.725051279@cos> bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw) writes:
>>In <BzMI8D.L4H@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
>>
>>>In article <bob1.724607266@cos> bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw) writes:

>>>>Guess I'm just too old-fashioned, but if this crap is the 'Brave
>>>>New World', I'll keep my tired old one thank you very much.
>>
>>>Keep it.  But don't legislate my children (intended or accidental
>>>or unknown) away from me because of it.
>>
>>I have no intention of legislating anyone's children away from them.
>>It strikes me that the persistent theme of this thread is 'Don't
>>legislate any of my children (i, a, or u) into my areas of fiscal
>>responsibility.

>Many conservatives see it that way.

Hey! At last, I'm a conservative again! The folks in t.p.m think
I'm a flaming socialist. :-/

>Many conservatives also find that abortion is irresponsible --
>especially when a woman decides she's just not capable of raising
>the child.

Well (Peter. are you listening?) I'm not pro-abortion as I would
much rather we develop fool-proof methods of birth control, but
I am pro-choice since the alternative would have me sticking my
nose (and legislation) where I really believe neither has any
business.

>But her choice is legal.

Yes it is, but biology dictates that she is the one who carries
the z/e/f. Now, how do we get around this problem in a manner
that is fair to both men and women AND to any child that might
be born? That's the nut, and frankly I don't have the answer.
I can't get too upset about 'potential' children as some seem
to do, but I sure don't take any comfort in seeing children
living in poverty.

>It is not surprising that when a man says he should have an 
>equivalent choice about the lifelong impact of parenthood,
>a conservative mind will translate that into a denial of responsibility.
>A feminist mind will do that, too.

And this is the part I don't have the answer to. If the woman opts
to bear the child - even if she knew full well that the man had
no desire to be a father and took all reasonable precautions,
society can only 'see' two options - either he pays or they do -
and it doesn't require genius to figure which choice society
will make.

>A man's choice isn't legal, however.

>>Any father, no matter how he gained that estate, who
>>wants to look after his children has my support.

>Mine, too.  As do the fathers who used birth control and didn't
>want such an "estate," and made it clear bright and early.

>This thread is an objection to Michal's desire to DENY men 
>the ability to GAIN the "estate" if they don't pursue a woman 
>for 9 months after sleeping together.

That isn't quite the way I interpreted it, but I'll let Michal
speak for herself.
>Don
>-- 
>beaver@cs.psu.edu                       Opinions from the PC-challenged

Bob.

Newsgroups: soc.men
From: bhv@areaplg2.corp.mot.com (Bronis Vidugiris)
Subject: Re: shaving
Organization: Motorola, CCR&D, CORP, Schaumburg, IL
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 19:10:57 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.191410.27029@plx.com> asgard@sparky (J.R. Stoner) writes:
)wharfie (wrat@unisql.UUCP) wrote:
): 
): 	I'm not sure that this is an appropriate posting for soc.men,
): since it doesn't mention abortion or feminism or how women only get
): 70 cents on the dollar, but I hope you'll forgive me.

Never.  You forgot the :-)

): 	What's your favorite shaving cream?

)I use Gillette Foamy basic cream without ukky stuff like menthol.
)I have tried 'gels' and found the effect on my face, after finishing,
)was more like a stucco wall rather than the smooth velvet normally found there.

I wear a beard.  I use an electric razor on the parts that I do have
to shave (unfortunately, I have some spots that won't grow hair so I
can't wear a full beard without it looking horrible).

Xref: sparky soc.men:22009 alt.abortion.inequity:6236 alt.feminism:6724
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.feminism
Subject: Re: Male Choice Revisited
Date: 2 Jan 1993 20:41:03 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

forb0004@student.tc.umn.edu (Eric Forbis ) writes:

>In article <1h8fq5INNono@gap.caltech.edu> peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
>>We were discussing father notification of a woman's pregnancy
>>in order to allow him to claim the child should the woman choose
>>to give that child up for adoption.  My position is that the
>>birth of the child is already a matter of public record on 
>>which the father can easily follow up (eg, by writing to the
>>county recorder).  Thus there is no need for legislation 
>>mandating "paternal notification".  Moreover, notification
>>of the woman's pregnancy (as distinct from the *birth* of the
>>child) is a violation of the woman's right to privacy.

>highly mobile and people relocate frequently. Notifying a local government 
>where the father will likely never find the record is hardly making it 
>"public" in any meaningful sense-- but that's what you want, no?

>Notification of pregnancy is not a violation of the mother's right to 
>privacy. Rights end where others begin; a pregnancy exists in part because 
>of the other, and when fatherhood is the issue, that "other" certainly has 
>the right to know. 

Would you be satisfied with paternal notification of the child's birth?
I would have no problem with that with regards to privacy considerations,
since the birth is already a matter of the public record.  (I have problems
with requiring additional governmental paperwork, but that is not an 
direct inequity issue.)  However, requiring a woman to notify anyone of 
her pregnancy is a violation of her privacy.

-- 

                                                --  Michal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there's no reason!  
Xref: sparky soc.men:21878 alt.feminism:6616
From: colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten)
Subject: Utne Reader on Men and Women
Keywords: Utne Reader, Men, Women, etc.
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:34:15 GMT



The new Utne Reader (Jan/Feb 1993) has a collection of articles
under the header "Men & Women  Can we get along?  Should we
even try?"

There are too many articles for me to start typing them in (besides
copyright and the fact that Utne Reader has a login on Usenet) but
I recommend the issue and look forward to any discussion.

some of the articles are:

Women & Men: Can We Get Along?  .... Lawrence Wright (Texas Monthly)
Clarence Thomas & Anita Hill, black men & black women ... Rebecca Walker
It's A Jungle Out There, So Get Used To It! ... Camille Paglia
The blue balls bluff ... Helen Cordes
The Blame Game ... Sam Keen
Can men and women just be friends? ... Abby Ellin (Boston Phoenix)
Ending the War Between the Sexes .. Aaron R. Kipnis & Elizabeth Hingston
A revisionist history of men and women .. Brenda Ueland


There are also a number of sidebars from other publications.  Some
of the articles are incredibly one sided while others try to 
be even-handed.  You will also learn that there are some radical
people out there.  One example:

In the first article listed above he talks about Sally Gearhart
who in 1982 advocate "ovular merging" which merges two human eggs
to produce only female offspring, bring the ratio to 75/25 (female
to male) in one generation.  The author says "It's not genocide,
exactly.  It's more like job attrition, the way employers cut back
positions without actually firing anyone."  That's certainly a
broadminded position.  

I'd be interested in any discussion we can get going on these
articles.

marc colten

"
From: starbuck@galaxy.ucr.edu (starbuck)
Newsgroups: soc.men
Subject: Re: [misc.activism.progressive] Feminist group disrupts men's meeting
Date: 3 Jan 93 17:12:11 GMT
Organization: University of California, Riverside

In article <1992Dec30.224706.16841@panix.com> gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch) writes:
-In article <24597@galaxy.ucr.edu> starbuck@galaxy.ucr.edu (starbuck) writes:
-|                                     ...  NOW's unwritten policy of seeing
-| "all men as rapists."  ...
-
-If it's unwritten, how do _you_ know it's their
-policy?  Are you on the board of directors?  Please
-let us know....
-

Please read the "National Now Times" and feminist works by the leaders of
NOW and you will get my drift.

starbuck

Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.feminism
From: gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch)
Subject: Damned Articles
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 20:10:53 GMT
Organization: mydog in exile

gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel) writes:
| The following article was rejected from soc.feminism. ...

I think if your articles are going to wear this badge of
honor, we ought to have the citation as well.  That is, it
would seem fair -- and would satisfy our curiosity -- if we
could know what reason the moderators gave.  Even though what
the reason must have been often seems all too obvious.
-- 

 )*(    Gordon Fitch    )*(    gcf@panix.com    )*(
( 1238 Blg. Grn. Sta.,  NY NY 10274 * 718.273.5556 )
From: starbuck@galaxy.ucr.edu (starbuck)
Newsgroups: soc.men
Subject: Re: Utne Reader on Men and Women
Keywords: Utne Reader, Men, Women, etc.
Date: 3 Jan 93 17:31:42 GMT
Article-I.D.: galaxy.24645
Organization: University of California, Riverside

In article <1992Dec31.203415.11478@cbfsb.cb.att.com> colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten) writes:

-The new Utne Reader (Jan/Feb 1993) has a collection of articles
-under the header "Men & Women  Can we get along?  Should we
-even try?"
-
-There are too many articles for me to start typing them in (besides
-copyright and the fact that Utne Reader has a login on Usenet) but
-I recommend the issue and look forward to any discussion.
-
Marc, many of us do not have access to the Utne Reader so why don't
you over time give us a summary of the articles one by one.

starbuck
Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.feminism
From: rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari)
Subject: Re: Living in a State of Siege
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 00:57:05 GMT

In article <1i80iqINN879@gap.caltech.edu> peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
>gazit@duke.cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit) writes:
>
>>4) Older women have more money than older men and therefore they
>>   have access to better medical care.
>
>Not so.  Elderly men are usuallly better off than elderly women.
>
>Eg, the Economist (12/26/92, p. 39):
>In the next century some of society's poorest people will be elderly
>women...


	This is misleading.  *Statistically* older men have more
	money than older women simply because older women have a lot
	of poor elderly women to drag their average down.  There are,
	simply, less men left.  The men who get to this age are typicall
	men that have had money to lead a comfortable life.  

	Older women typically have the money from their dead husband's
	life insurance.  



-- 
      Blaming "society" for your problems is like blaming clouds for rain.
 ---  boycott == coercion == censorship == closed mindedness == cowardice  ---
	      "Psalms 23:1  The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want."  
		Shepherds are for sheep.   -----      Pain teaches.
From: wrat@unisql.UUCP (wharfie)
Newsgroups: soc.men
Subject: shaving
Date: 21 Dec 92 22:17:15 GMT
Organization: UniSQL, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA


	I'm not sure that this is an appropriate posting for soc.men,
since it doesn't mention abortion or feminism or how women only get
70 cents on the dollar, but I hope you'll forgive me.

	What's your favorite shaving cream?  For years I used Barbasol,
but I've switched to Edge.  I shave with my father's old double-edge 
Gillette, both as a link to the past and because it's much smoother
and more comfortable then any plastic flexy rotating-head throwaway I've
tried.  I used to use Wilkinson Sword blades, but now all I can ever
find are Gillette Blue...  Were can I get good razor blades these days?

								W.rat
Newsgroups: soc.men
From: aaldrich@encore.com (Al Aldrich)
Subject: Re: How come?
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 15:30:20 GMT

cgates@mitre.org (Curt Gates) writes:

>In article <4444@unisql.UUCP> wrat@unisql.UUCP (wharfie) writes:
>> Yaaahhhh, I was waiting for someone to say that.

>I knew you would appreciate it, my friend. Thats why I tossed it in. 
>Meanwhile, I have done some field research on the subject --I raised the 
>question at breakfast this morning, and my wife said virtually the same 
>things Amy did, with almost identical examples.  So then I reminded her of 
>how I could still see my aunts (now desceased) haggling over the last 
>penny at Miss Duttons Tea Room. And then haggling over how to divide the 
>tip! She even topped that by remembering an incident, totalling 30 cents, 
>that involved  her mother in law!  Now that hit pretty close to home.  So 
>I said I thought it had a lot to do with cultural background and maybe the great depression.  


Personally, my experience has been that this sort of behaviour is more
of a cultural than a gender thing. In my experience it is usually the 
WW II generation and before that has this obsession with money. I know that
when my partner and I go out with our friends under 50,
that include all manner of
male/female combinations ( single , partnered gay/straight ), the split it
up equally philosophy is usually preferred . However, when we go out with
relatives and friends that are over 50, it is more like the scenario that
was attributed here to women as opposed to men, regarless of gender.

al



-- 
Al Aldrich aaldrich@encore.com 305-797-2335
"Mythology: The body of a primitive people's beliefs concerning its
origin, early history, heroes, deities and so forth, as distinguished
from the true accounts which it invents later." -- Ambrose Bierce
Xref: sparky soc.men:22057 alt.abortion.inequity:6260 alt.feminism:6763
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.abortion.inequity,alt.feminism
Subject: Re: Male Choice Revisited
Date: 4 Jan 1993 00:00:46 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu

karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger) writes:

>In article <1i4ul0INNjf6@gap.caltech.edu> peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
>>requiring a woman to notify anyone of 
>>her pregnancy is a violation of her privacy.

>Its not a violation of her privacy if you intend the result of her actions,
>and the result of that pregnancy, to impact on SOMEONE ELSE'S financial
>future.

It is not the pregnancy that affects "someone else's" financial future.
It is the birth.

>Women should be free to keep from men the fact that they are pregnant,
>presumably to keep them from influencing their decision on whether or not to
>bear the child.

At this point the men has no *legal* way to force the woman's decision
on whether of not to bear the child.  So what good does it do to 
legislate that the woman must tell him about the pregnancy?  (Besides
the obvious questions of enforceability of such legislation....)

>However, those same women should be able to bill the man for the result of
>>her decision<, without his input, and without his concern.

Strictly speaking, it is not the woman that bills the man.  Child support
is ordered by the state on behalf of the child.

-- 

                                                --  Michal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there's no reason!
From: faith@amiganet.chi.il.us (Fred Drummand)
Newsgroups: soc.libraries.talk
Subject: SLS - Suburban Library System Main Frame Operator Visiting Net
Date: 24 Dec 92 00:19:58 CST
Organization: Amiga Network Information Systems



Hello I Work in the SLS System In Illinois.  I work at the main frame.. Just
visiting and thought Id Say Hi!

Fred Drummand
Collumbia College
Graphic Arts Major
From: lincoln@rand.org (Tom Lincoln)
Newsgroups: soc.libraries.talk
Subject: Re: Library bashing??
Date: 23 Dec 92 18:41:13 GMT
Organization: RAND



>I think the historical society person (surely not a librarian) who let
>the negative go was a fool.

I was with you up to that point... but no risk, no cooperation, no
reward...

Tom
From: sti@dhmolde.no (Frode Sti)
Subject: Utskrift /Pathworks
Reply-To: sti@dhmolde.no (Frode Sti)
Organization: Computer Science - DhMolde Norway
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 14:34:28 GMT


Hallo!

Kan noen hjelpe meg med flgende problem ?

Vi har en Decstation 5000/200 som Pathworksserver for PC'er.

Er det mulig  f til at utskrift fra PC'ene ikke skal f med forsida
(banner page) ? 

OBS! Problemet er noen mer enn 'lpr -h'.


Frode Sti  Unixmanager ved DH molde
Newsgroups: no.unix
From: adne@ddb.be.statoil.no (Adne Hestenes)
Subject: SLIP for Sun
Reply-To: adne@ddb.be.statoil.no (Adne Hestenes)
Organization: Statoil
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 13:34:27 GMT


Hei,
Jeg ser etter siste versjon av SLIP for Sun.

Er det forresten noen som har erfaring med
SLIP kontra PPP, det skal brukes mellom en 2 UNIX maskiner(Sun)?

Mvh

adne
Newsgroups: no.unix
From: oea@usit.uio.no (Odd Einar Aurbakken)
Subject: [t]csh vs. [ba]sh (var: bash for sun4)
Organization: University of Oslo
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:54:08 GMT

In article <1992Dec23.155901*Harald.Eikrem@delab.sintef.no>, Harald.Eikrem@delab.sintef.no writes:
> Hvorfor g} for noe s} ubrukelig som Bash?

Vel, jeg har brukt csh, s tcsh et r eller to, men de siste rene
har jeg stort sett brukt bash, kunne ikke tenke meg  g tilbake til
noe *csh. Det er altfor slitsomt i bruk (som et eksempel kan man ta
editeringsmuligheter, tcsh kommer ikke opp imot gnureadline!). zsh
eller en vidreutviklet rc derimot kunne kanskje vre en ide. Men jeg
foretrekker allikevel bash, det er n engang praktisk  ha samme type
shell til interaktivt bruk som til programmering. (glem perlsh! :-)

> Bash er skralt som interaktivt
> shell,

Kan du utdype det, hva gjr tcsh bedre?

> og fullstendig h}pl|st til programmeringsform}l, det siste fordi det
> tygger shell kode enda treigere enn et vanilje csh :), om det er mulig.

Jeg vil ikke _anbefale_ bash til programmering, hvis du trenger noe
kraftigere/raskere enn sh s se p perl, men  kalle det hplst pga.
at det er noe tregere enn csh er vel  g litt for langt? Hastighet
synes jeg er et skt argument  bruke nr det gjelder shell program-
mering, vil man ha hy hastighet skriver man i et kompilert sprk
(eller perl).

Jeg vil anbefale _alle_  lese news.answers: "Csh Programming Considered
Harmful", <1992Nov30.123449.8118@news.eng.convex.com> av Tom Christiansen
<tchrist@convex.COM>.

-oea
Newsgroups: no.unix
From: Harald.Eikrem@delab.sintef.no
Subject: Re: bash for sun4
Organization: SINTEF DELAB, Trondheim, Norway.
Date: 23 Dec 92 15:59:01

Hvorfor g} for noe s} ubrukelig som Bash?  Ok, dette starter vel en av disse
typiske religionskrigene, men jeg mener det!  Bash er skralt som interaktivt
shell, og fullstendig h}pl|st til programmeringsform}l, det siste fordi det
tygger shell kode enda treigere enn et vanilje csh :), om det er mulig.

Tipset er: skaff deg tcsh 6.03 til interaktivt bruk, og pdksh 4.7 som shell
programtolker hvis du mener /bin/sh ikke holder.  Jeg skal gjerne bidra med
tips om hvordan sette opp et slagkraftig interaktivt milj| i tcsh hvis du
|nsker det.

  ~~h
Newsgroups: no.unix
From: iversen@dsfys1.fi.uib.no (Per Steinar Iversen)
Subject: Re: Utskrift /Pathworks
Reply-To: iversen@vsfys1.fi.uib.no
Organization: Department of Physics, University of Bergen, Norway
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 06:43:15 GMT


In article <1992Dec22.143428.20666@ugle.unit.no>, sti@dhmolde.no (Frode Sti) writes:

>Hallo!
>
>Kan noen hjelpe meg med flgende problem ?
>
>Vi har en Decstation 5000/200 som Pathworksserver for PC'er.
>
>Er det mulig  f til at utskrift fra PC'ene ikke skal f med forsida
>(banner page) ? 
>
>OBS! Problemet er noen mer enn 'lpr -h'.
>
>
>Frode Sti  Unixmanager ved DH molde

Vi har flgende oppsett for en PS-printer, den er tilgjengelig bde fra 
Pathworks og fra LPR/LPD:

# Kontor PostScript-printer: OKI OL840
ps|lp|lp4|post|postscript:\
        :af=/usr/adm/lp4acct:\
        :br#9600:\
        :ct=dev:\
        :fc#0177777:\
        :fs#03:\
        :lf=/usr/adm/lp4err:\
        :lp=/dev/tty00:\
        :mc#20:\
        :mx#0:\
        :of=/usr/lib/lpdfilters/dstrip|/usr/lib/lpdfilters/ln03rof:\
        :pl#66:\
        :pw#80:\
        :rw:\
        :sd=/usr/spool/lpd4:\
        :uv=4.0:\
        :xc#0177777:\
        :xf=/usr/lib/lpdfilters/xf:\
        :xs#044000:\
        :Da=postscript:\
        :Ps=a4:\
        :Sd=a4:\
        :Ss=a4:\
        :sf:\
        :sh:

dstrip er et filter som kverker evt. ^D som frste tegn i PS-filer, Microsoft
synes at slike er en god ide - men det knekker logikken som switcher inn
ASCII-til-PS filteret ved behov. Hper dette hjelper.

-psi

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! Per Steinar Iversen    ! Internet:     iversen@vsfys1.fi.uib.no              !
! Fysisk Institutt       ! BITnet:       iversen@cernvm.bitnet                 !
! Universitetet i Bergen ! HEPnet:       VSFYS::IVERSEN (VSFYS=21.341=21845)   !
! Allegaten 55           ! Phone:       +47 5212770                            !
! N-5007 Bergen          ! Fax:         +47 5318334                            !
! NORWAY                 !                                                     !
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: no.unix
From: Steinar.Haug@delab.sintef.no (Steinar Haug)
Subject: Re: bash for sun4
Organization: SINTEF DELAB, Trondheim, Norway.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 18:52:03 GMT

> eg har litt probelmer med aa kompilere opp bash for sun4.  Under lenking seier
> den at den ikkje finn "_alloca".  Eg har proevt aa ta vekk ein del saanne

Du kan jo pr|ve } kompilere den med gcc. gcc har alloca innebygd...

Steinar Haug
SINTEF DELAB
Newsgroups: no.unix
From: m05751@foxtrot.data.st.statoil.no (Bjorn Hell Larsen)
Subject: Re: bash for sun4
Reply-To: bjla@statoil.no
Organization: Statoil, Norway
	<1992Dec23.155901*Harald.Eikrem@delab.sintef.no>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 07:24:20 GMT


In article <1992Dec23.155901*Harald.Eikrem@delab.sintef.no> Harald.Eikrem@delab.sintef.no writes:
>
>Hvorfor g} for noe s} ubrukelig som Bash?  Ok, dette starter vel en av disse
>typiske religionskrigene, men jeg mener det!

I sfall m det vel vre fordi du kommer med ukonstruktiv og drlig
underbygget kritikk, i stedet for  gi oss nyttig informasjon.

>                                              Bash er skralt som interaktivt
>shell, og fullstendig h}pl|st til programmeringsform}l, det siste fordi det
>tygger shell kode enda treigere enn et vanilje csh :), om det er mulig.
>

Jeg bruker bash som interaktivt shell, og vil gjerne vite hvorfor
det er 'skralt' til den oppgaven. Hva er det som mangler? Hva er det
som er feil?

(Jeg programmerer ikke i bash, s hastigheten den tygger "shell kode" med
interesserer meg ikke s mye.)


Bjrn
Newsgroups: no.unix
From: trondk@zevs.ifi.unit.no (Trond Kandal)
Subject: bash for sun4
Organization: University of Trondheim, Norway
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 11:57:46 GMT

Hei !

eg har litt probelmer med aa kompilere opp bash for sun4.  Under lenking seier
den at den ikkje finn "_alloca".  Eg har proevt aa ta vekk ein del saanne
"define-setningar" i Makefile,- men det ser ikkje ut til aa hjelpe.
Og det som er endaa rarare er at programmet blir lenka saman og ser ut til aa
fungere (?).
MEN for aa vere heilt sikker:

Er det nokon som har kompilert opp bash for Sun4,- saa kunne eg kanskje laste det
ned ... ?

Eg kjoeyrer altsaa Sun4 og SunOS 4.1.1.


Takk !

Trond Kandal.
-- 
Trond Kandal                    | e-mail:
Institutt for Informatikk       |   Trond.Kandal@ifi.unit.no
Universitetet i Trondheim, AVH  | voice:
N-7055 DRAGVOLL                 |   +47 7 59 17 26
NORWAY                          | fax:
				|   +47 7 59 17 33

"I never make mistakes,- once I thought I had made a mistake,
but I was mistaken."
Newsgroups: no.general