HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 19:21:30 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.162646.12033@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>In article <BxB602.E6L@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>
>>Simple, K e n is K e n, and since K e n is K e n, then K e n is K e n,
>>and thus K e n is not boring, for K e n can only be K e n.
>>
>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>
>
>Ken, you are apparently having problems with your grammar server.
 
K e n never has problems with K e n's grammar server.

>'Ken' is a noun.
>'boring' is an adjective.

Thank you for sharing that. K e n is certain that we are all astounded
by your incredibly high intelligence. Now that you are finished with
consuming various parts of your body, please terminate your posting
abilities at once.

>therefore, the statements "ken is ken" and "ken is boring" are in no way
>incompatible, and in fact, each sentence gives us a separate piece of
>information.
>
>Ken is ken
>ken is boring
>ken is ken
>ken is boring

This is not information. This is propaganda. You are misinformed
as usual. Such behavior will only result in your utter demise.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: Vendetta? What vendetta?
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:38:48 GMT

glads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone) writes:
->You're a sick man, keegan.

and here i thought you wanted to be my friend......
From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: RE: THE ULTIMATE FLAME OF FLAMES
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 12:46:11 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

ooi@latcs2.lat.oz.au (Jeffrey K Ooi) writes:
> usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.Edu writes:
> >you already flamed yourself, why should i bother?
> 
> At least I have a signature!

I didn't know you could use crayon on credit card vouchers.


mathew
[ Oh dear.  That *was* a bit John F. Woods, wasn't it? ]

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 06:09:43 GMT

In article <1379@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
>weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
>: 
>: 	Whatever your interpretation of what he did say, he DID NOT say what
>: was originally attributed to him. My refutation stands.
>: 	Would I feel threatened? No, not really. Although at this moment my
>: penis is limp. Someone who is prone to making such ridiculous, overused 
>: insults would have much more to fear, I think.
>
>I only used 'em once, Sunny-Jim. You seem to think Georgie meant
>something entirely different by his remark- care to favor me with
>your interpretation?  Seemed pretty clear to me, but then I'm a 
>wooly-headed, soft-brained lefty pinko...
>Bill
	YOU only used them once, but limp-dick, no-brain, bullet-head 
(something like that) are anything but the most original of insults. 
What was originally attributed to him was 'he does not think atheists should
be citizens' the statement presented as 'evidence'  had him being asked 
about patriotism and citizenship for atheists. He responded with something
like 'don't know' and other ambigious statements. He did not state that 
atheists should not be citizens. There is a big difference between saying-
A is not true and saying- it is not known if A is true.
	By the way, I don't think Bush would ever seriously consider taking
citizenship from atheists. It was probably just something to curry favor with
the religious right. Not the purest of motives, but then I wouldn't 
expect any better from ANY politician, and certainly not slick Willie.
	By the way, your assesment of yourself is fairly accurate.

William Everett

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: ckincy@mcs213c.cs.umr.edu (Charles Kincy)
Subject: Re: Hey duds!
Followup-To: /vmunix /etc/passwd /config.sys   
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 09:45:16 GMT
Organization: University of Hell - Gehenna
Keywords: gumby

In article <1X5XTB3w165w@f525.n163.z1.fidonet.org> skaff@f525.n163.z1.fidonet.org (Mark Skaff) writes:
>Hey!  Are all you people aware that you are violating Policy 4?  You should
>all be careful.  I might policy you.

Policy 4? 

Fidonet?

*bark bark*

*chews through Fidonet linkup*

*pant pant*

*wags tail*

*bark bark*

cpk
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.mel-is-swell
From: samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar Samant)
Subject: Re: Time to retire, assholes. (was "reason to exist" or some such fuck)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 07:29:38 GMT

keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) actually conserves his breath
to asks a SIX word question:
>
>when does your semester end, sonny?

Right on, Keegan Jr! A perfect posting to warm the cockles of Darcy's 
dear old heart! If this were directed at Darcy he would work himself
up to his geriatric frenzy, scratch his head furiously for the perfect
reply, and then the golden words will flow out of his keyboard:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
      PROVE IT!
                                                       -Kevin 
---------------------------------------------------------------------

They will make their epic journey across the net to your screen, to set 
your adrenalin thumping and make you a creature of wild passions until 
you finally find article <234.32465.564712634@rotag.mi.org> where Darcy 
has puked some more of his brainless drivel.

You contemptible fart, you haven't still understood that I DON'T want to
deny you these simple pleasures of your teensy uneventful life. I have a
large heart, and if billing and cooing with Darcy is your best method to
jerk off, by all means do so.

But here is where you must follow me closely, Keegan Jr! Train your fast
degenerating brain here, best as you can: there is the rest of the net
out there.

Surprised? Simple fact of life. Yes, Darcy gets a hard-on when he sees your
postings, very true, but there are people here other than Darcy, and they 
all think you are an asshole. Without exception, Keegan Jr.

But the situation is not completely out of hand, dear heart. For one, they
think Darcy is a bigger asshole. For another, there is a solution. It's 
simple! Just shut up. Don't post. Fade away. Get out. Move your posteriors. 
See life in its myriad forms and lineaments. Quit out of reading news for 
once. Lead a healthier existence.

And be so kind as to find a thesaurus. I notice with sadness, in your 
hysterical letter, a certain lack of novelty:

>when does your semester end, sonny?

Now, Keegan Jr, there is no need to advertise your single-register cerebrum
here, and I wouldn't have quoted your embarrassing little missive if I had
not seen the greater good in doing it.

Keegan Jr, a question like "when does your semester end" is a mark of 
irreversible senility. Make no mistake about that. Slurp it up as a clue
(yes, you can, try,) and act on it.

To summarise my last post (since I see that your head was shaking too much 
for you to read it properly):

1) You and Darcy are the crumbliest fossils here.

2) No one gives a flying fuck to what your incoherent babble says.

3) We will be too happy to provide you rocket fuel to eat if you 
   promise to jettison yourself out of alt.flame with your career 
   best fart.

For your own good, Keegan Jr!

GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE.

Sincerely,
From: jpm8m@curry.edschool.Virginia.EDU (Jason Pittman Mitchell)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Warlord III
Date: 5 Nov 92 07:11:32 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

epitome_of_humor@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU  writes:
> 
> HAW HAW!@!@!
> 
> I GET IT!@!@!
> 
> HA !@ HA!@!
> 
> YER SO FUCKIN FUNNY, YOU SHOULD POST TO REC.HUMOR.FUNNY!@!@!@
> 
> tee hee :^)- haw haw haw lame-o-rama
> 
> losers
> 

Well, gee Rob, with standards like you out there, how could I
even make an attempt at comedy. . . 


What's it like up there, Rob?

Wow, I've already forgotten all my other idols.
--
Jason Mitchell     "Computers are useless.  They can only give you answers."
jpm8m@virginia.edu                         ---Pablo Picasso
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Last test
Date: 6 Nov 1992 17:38:32 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

This is the last test.
Thank you for your patience.

==NAMENAMENAME==

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: gsmith@lauren.uucp (Gene W. Smith)
Subject: Re: THE ULTIMATE FLAME OF FLAMES
Organization: IWR, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 19:12:46 GMT

In article <kmr4.101.720928261@po.CWRU.edu> kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M
Ryan) writes:
>In article <1992Nov4.233342.20682@latcs1.lat.oz.au>
ooi@latcs5.lat.oz.au (Jeffrey K Ooi) writes:

>>let the flames begin...

>	*yawn*

Burp!

-- 
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/IWR/Ruprecht-Karls University 
               gsmith@kalliope.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: PSU
Date: 10 Nov 1992 15:22:33 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

i saw a bumper sticker here at stanford yesterday.  it said


           Penn State
           and pissed at U


whoever would have thought that someone from PSU would be capable of
traversing the country via automobile.  perhaps mommy drove.

given the fact that they were on stanford property, they probably
were leaving after a stint of toilet-cleaning.  somebody's gotta do
it :)
From: krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: lamest follow-up ever
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:04:26 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <BxGnnI.yB@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>(Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>> Thus K e n, is not "slipping", for K e n has nothing to slip from.
>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>
>How true.  Kenneth's posts cannot be "slipping" into stupidity since 
>they were already as stupid as possible.

You seem to be quite misinformed, for K e n's posts are not stupid.
They are very intelligent, for K e n has posted them, thus they must
be. K e n is K e n and K e n does not post stupid posts, for K e n
only posts intelligent posts, because K e n is K e n.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: exit.  At once please.
Summary: This ain't alt.geek.prose.
Date: 5 Nov 92 07:33:39 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

z_madsenka@ccsvax.sfasu.edu writes:
>I am on fire with the heat that burns.

   That's generally a symptom of venereal disease.

>And evry body knows it wont go away

   True.  Once you have it, it's for life.

>because its her listning to me
>watching the cursur going blink,blink,bblink

   And it appears to have reached your pea-brain, for 
   you definitely appear to be in an advanced stage of 
   syphallitic dementia.

-- Andy
From: dac@prolix.apana.org.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Ethnophobia
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 15:32:11 GMT
 <1dr472INN81d@bigboote.WPI.EDU>
Organization: More like Dis~, really.
X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00 beta rel2

In article <1dr472INN81d@bigboote.WPI.EDU>, PostMistress General writes:

> What the hell should we care what you think of our ex-president...you don't
> even live here.  :-p

Ooh, how inviting. 

For your obviously lackwit information, 'Liz', fully 95% of the
world's population doesn't live in North America. Surely the 9.5 in 10
people have intrinsically more power than you Murricans over what
subjects we discuss? Even if they do include your ex-presidential
effluvia.

Get a mind, you cloth-eared bint!

> 						--liz

Dac
--
dac@prolix.apana.org.au              David Andrew Clayton.           // _| _  _
dac@prolix.sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au      Canberra, Australia           \X/ (_](_](_
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: test
Date: 6 Nov 1992 17:39:26 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

OK Just one more...

I think we are fully tested now.

==NAMENAMENAME==

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jdh@math.psu.edu (Jeremy D Hall)
Subject: Re: Rabbit-knowing
Organization: Penn State Department of Mathematics
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 04:02:38 GMT

In article <1992Nov8.203826.7022@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC) writes:
>
>>informed the State Police. It is quite legal in college station, 
>>pennsylvania, however, so drop by and ask for K E N or bruce.
>>

College Station, PA??  I'm at Penn State A&M????  So are we undefeated or 6-3?

Hello, let's learn our geography.

-A bored person


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 05:53:26 GMT

In article <XFFZTB6w165w@mantis.co.uk>, mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
> At a guess, it beats voting for a mealy-mouthed fascist hypocrite who claims
> atheists can't be US citizens, nobody but his friends should be allowed to
> have abortions, and that there is no recession.

You stupid brainwashed, pathetic attempt at a human being. Only a spineless
liberal worm like yourself would have the lack of intelligence to post
something as moronic as you have. For just one moment, stop your hand from
stroking your rather swollen penis and kindly place it far up your ass and
shake hands with your mother. She would be proud of her cow's rectum for a son.

--The Phantom 
Xref: sparky alt.flame:14665 talk.abortion:47714
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Vendetta? What vendetta?
Date: 12 Nov 92 04:35:58 GMT
Organization: Who, me???


Subject: Top 25 News Submitters by User by number of articles for the last 2 weeks
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 15:45:40 GMT


         No. of       % of
Rank Articles KBytes Total   User

				.
				.
				.

  12   160     162.3  0.0%   keegan@acm.RPI.EDU  (James G. Keegan Jr.)
			      73% talk.abortion
			      11% alt.fan.kevin-darcy
			      9% alt.flame


						Amused, almost flattered,

							- Kevin
From: swoodwar@zeus.calpoly.edu (Swo Odwar)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: WHAT IS THIS GROUP ALL ABOUT
Date: 5 Nov 92 06:36:16 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame,alt.kalbo
Organization: VoidSoft Ink.

THIS GROUP DOESN'T SEEM TO get much traffic

wHAT IS IT ALL about?

sorry about the caps but my shift and deleter dont work
-- 
OHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTF 
                guvf vf zl arj ebg guvegrra fvt. ubcr lbh yvxr vg. 

OHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTFOHTF
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: iseyvb934765bp97q697346
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 15:44:13 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.015944.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:

>I would also add spineless worm, bleeding heart, baby killing, tree hugging,
>anti-business, anti-prosperity, big government, tax and spend,
>Kill-a-human-to-save-an-owl, Jeffrey Dahmer saving, god fearing, LIBERAL. 

thats very impressive. have you been memorizing all of dan quayle's speeches
for us, you fascist hate-mongering, dick-sucking, falwell-fellating, dont-
tax-but-spend-anyway, highest deficits in the history of mankind, pus
eating ELECTION LOSING worm of a conservative. eat shit, loser.
From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: ken.  no caps or spaces, just ken.
Date: 6 Nov 92 19:03:44 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1992Nov6.025924.26998@cs.odu.edu> page@sirocco.cs.odu.edu () writes:
>>>>>How can you followup a discussion about your genitals on alt.flame
>>>>>by claiming that such a topic is not on alt.flame?  Obviously it
>>>>>is a topic of discussion or we wouldn't be discussing it, would
>>>>>we?  Does anyone have any more info on ken's genitals?  Bruce?
>>>>
>>>>K e n does not recognize such a discussion, thus K e n is not 
>>>>discussing such a topic. If K e n wishes to present that information
>>>>to the group, then K e n will do so. At the present time, this
>>>>discussion is purposeless. Must K e n continue to inform people that
>>>>K e n's genitals is not the topic of discussion? Engage your brains
>>>>and then perhaps you will understand.
>>>>
>>>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>>>
>>>this has got to be the lamest followup I've ever seen by ken.
>>>I mean, I read alt.flame every day, and I follow the ken 
>>>flames for the fun of it, but this one sickened me with its 
>>>stupidity.  ken, you're slipping.
>>>I suppose he'll call me misinformed now.  joy.
>>
>>Yes, you are correct. You are misinformed, but that's besides the point.
>>K e n was discussing topical arrangements. K e n never discussed
>>K e n's genitals, thus K e n's followup (above) was correct to the
>>previous post, which was a definition of stupidity. Thus K e n, is
>>not "slipping", for K e n has nothing to slip from.
>>
>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>
>at first, i was going to flame you back, but then i decided that
>everyone already knew that you were an idiot.  get your jollies
>ken, and we'll just treat you like the human tetherball you are.

K e n is not a human tetherball or an idiot. K e n is K e n, and K e n
cannot be anything else but K e n.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 16:26:46 GMT

In article <BxB602.E6L@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:

>Simple, K e n is K e n, and since K e n is K e n, then K e n is K e n,
>and thus K e n is not boring, for K e n can only be K e n.
>
>K e n   R o b i n s o n


Ken, you are apparently having problems with your grammar server.

'Ken' is a noun.
'boring' is an adjective.

therefore, the statements "ken is ken" and "ken is boring" are in no way
incompatible, and in fact, each sentence gives us a separate piece of
information.

Ken is ken
ken is boring
ken is ken
ken is boring
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Thanks, Melvin Millard.
Date: 13 Nov 92 15:32:34 GMT
Organization: University of Northern Indiana

In article <BxL7Lu.KJH@cmptrc.lonestar.org>, andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>(Melvin Gladstone) writes:
>>     
>>  [bait]
>>                       
>
> [you're dumb]
>  
> [you masturbate]
> 
> [you have a small penis] 

Yawn.  I guess it was a waste of time.

>  --  Andy

Melvin M. Gladstone
From: kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M Ryan)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 17:15:05 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b64746.student.cwru.edu

In article <63.2AF95C84@business.fidonet.org> Leonard.Kinerson@p0.f110.n363.z1.fidonet.org (Leonard Kinerson) writes:
>Are There any people out there that voted For Clinton
>If So WHY!!!!!!!!!
>I would realy like to know 
>Thanks

	I certainly would not vote for Bush: why?

1) Coodles communistic countries: 

	China  
	Advocated the Yugoslavia people remain communist

	Can we afford to have a president who is staunchly against 
supporting the proliferation of democracy in the world? Who rewards those 
who suppress crushes democratic factions?

	2) Coodles inhuman tyrants.

	Suddam Hussein
	The support of Kuwait.	

3) Provides the technology needed for nuclear weapons and delieverance.

	Suddam Hussein

4) Lies, lies lies.

	Not on just small issues, but in LARGE important issues:

	ie taxes, goverment spending, etc

5) The "buck starts here" president.

	Has an excuse for everything.

etc
Xref: sparky alt.flame:14742 alt.fan.kevin-darcy:583
From: dac@prolix.apana.org.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
Subject: Re: a reason to exist
Date: 13 Nov 92 12:22:45 GMT
Followup-To: talk.abortion,alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
Organization: More like Dis~, really.
X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00 beta rel2

In article <lefty-091192131607@lefty.apple.com>, Lefty writes:

> In article <1992Nov8.022830.20646@ncsu.edu>, dsh@odin.uucp (Doug
> Holtsinger) wrote:
> > 
> > If certain moderate pro-choicers didn't exist,
> > what would Keegan do?  Play with himself all day?
> 
> Doug, if you've failed to learn anything else from USENET, you should at
> least have learned that not everybody shares your particular predilections.

Kebbin does.

Since he is apparently 95% of the poster in alt.flame [by
inconsequentiality rating], I guess that Doug has a right to
view the situation in that particular light.

At least he isn't F'ken Ken. Sheesh, what a dweeboid!

Dac
--
dac@prolix.apana.org.au              David Andrew Clayton.           // _| _  _
dac@prolix.sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au      Canberra, Australia           \X/ (_](_](_
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 06:33:23 GMT

In article <XFFZTB6w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes:
>Leonard.Kinerson@p0.f110.n363.z1.fidonet.org (Leonard Kinerson) writes:
>> Are There any people out there that voted For Clinton
>> If So WHY!!!!!!!!!
>
>At a guess, it beats voting for a mealy-mouthed fascist hypocrite who claims
>atheists can't be US citizens,
	didn't say this

>nobody but his friends should be allowed to
>have abortions,
	nor this

>and that there is no recession.
>
	He's right. There hasn't been for about a year now.

>mathew

	Get your facts straight before you mouth off.

William Everett
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Get this JACKASS outta here
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 15:37:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.012440.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:

>"Unfocused aggression" huh? I thought I made it pretty clear that I can't
>stomach your postings.
>
>--The Phantom


WHAT A KOOL NICKNAME!@!@!@# I bet yer buddies guv you this nickname cause
you are so smoooooothhhh and stealthy, right? Goddamn, I wish i was as
cool as you so I could have a cool nickname. Maybe if I start telling all
my friends to call me "Specter" or something, theyll start doing it. Then
I can sign all my posts with my nickname, and net.folks all over the world
will bow down to me and my koolness. IF I ONLY HAD A NICKNAME!@

Fortunately, I have a strong stomach, so I can handle your postings. I
mean, its not like they are red hot jalepeno peppers, man, its more
like they are bland gruel with maybe a little margarine added. BLAND.

so fuck off you worthless asshole. Go have a nickname contest with troll,
fellow loser.

-Rob

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: sche7135@mach1.wlu.ca (Scott Schelter u)
Subject: FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!
Organization: Wilfrid Laurier University
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 17:18:04 GMT


	FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     That's right folks! I'm looking for the most graphic, verbose
flames and insults you can muster. Gimme' something really juicy.


                SCOTTY LE DOG
                sche7135@mach1.wlu.ca


        No mail-bombs please .


Newsgroups: alt.flame