HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dave@sys6626.bison.mb.ca (Dave Hall)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: [8F18] A Streetcar Named Marge,,
Keywords: simpson episode summary capsule
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 12:59:35 CST
Organization: Watching Paint Dry Society (this month: Yellow!)

baker@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Andrew Baker) writes:

> In article <1992Oct10.051024.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au> c8923075@cc.newcastle.edu
> >   I'm not an easy man to work for.  While directing `Hats off to Hunka',
>                                                                    -----
> What is "Hunka"?  I remember it as "Hats off to Hanukkah."
> 

Yeah, wellll...suffering from a slight hearing lost (eg. tone deaf) it's
a lot harder to spell words like `Hanukkah' if you don't hear how to
pronounce them :(  As well, I'm sure others will point out my mistakes in
the Q&Ss (hopefully it will be by email).
 
Dave                    "When I hit reverse, I can make them go back in!"
                                 Bart on the video tape of SBII's birth.

--
Internet: dave@sys6626.bison.mb.ca
Smail: P.O. Box 44058,  Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.  R2W 5M3
From: cb366@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark B. Bendiksen)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: Oct 15 episode
Date: 16 Oct 92 20:32:03 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: thor.ins.cwru.edu


Jeremy Radosh writes:

>Didn't anyone catch the Bob Fosse-esque director of the pagent.  The smoking
>and temper tantrums were straight out of the Bob Fosse movie (starring
>Roy Scheider, what was the title?).  A short reference, but excellent.

_All That Jazz_


Mark B. Bendiksen
cb366@freenet.cwru.edu
-- 
"If we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto,
 We'll just be bogus, too."-- Dr. Jeff Spicolli
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: doctor8@jhuvms.hcf.jhu.edu (Jason Abner Miller)
Subject: Re: springfield is in .....
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University - HCF
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 18:12:00 GMT

In article <2927714536.2.rdemo37@psilink.com>, "John Horzepa" <rdemo37@psilink.com> writes...
>>Now I'm not going to argue that it is actually in a Canadian province, as
>>there have been many references to the contrary of this.  However, to
>>emphasize that Springfield is a "generic-could-be-anywhere" town, I'd point
>>out that it *could* be here in Ontario because of the following:
>>
>>1)  It is near highway 401 (pronounced four-oh-one; just as anyone in
[stuff deleted]

>There is a very strong argument against Springfield being in Canada.  
>Last season, Lisa entered an essay contest on Why America is Great or 
>something like that and won a free trip to Washington DC.  In 
>Washington, Lisa was heartbroken to discover that her representative was 
>taking money under the table to destroy Springfield forest land.  The 
>last time I checked, Canada does not have any members in the House of 
>Representatives or the Senate.  I will admit there are many Canadian 
>references, but I think this just indicates that Springfield is in a 
>northern state.  Also, there are not too many hockey references.
> 
	Frankly, I'm not sure that Springfield is supposed to BE anywhere.
"The Simpsons" is an American show, therefore I think that it was intended
to take place in the States.
	Also, doesn't ANYONE here remember that "Father Knows Best" took
place in a town called Springfield??  Seems to me that "Simpsons" began as a
spoof on the "Father Knows Best" type sitcoms of the 1950's, so placing them
in Springfield makes a lot of sense.
	When Principal Skinner starts speaking with a Canadian accent, and
Krusty gets French subtitles, THEN I'll consider the Canada theory.  

							Jason Miller
"No, HBO costs extra ..." - the aliens in "Halloween Special 1"
From: bw462@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bucky Whaley)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Lisa's hair... [9F02] (Was Re: Oct 15 episode)
Date: 16 Oct 1992 14:59:00 GMT
Organization: The Lutefisk Watch, Style Division
Reply-To: bw462@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bucky Whaley)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, cal@ee.ryerson.ca (Calvin Henry-Cotnam) says:

>The scene with Lisa at the hairdresser struck a funny nerve with me.
>I have commented to others before how women/girls will go to "get
>their hair done", and make a *really* big thing about it if it is
>for some special occasion.  But they always return looking exactly
>the same as when they left.  I mean EXACTLY.  At least when I get
>my hair cut, I return looking as if it was.

I thought Lisa's hair did look different, although the basic style
ended up the same.  The lines in the `points' were softer, slightly
wavy.

-Bucky "big-wheel-keep-on-turnin'" Whaley

-- 
Bucky Whaley                          It's funny because it's true.
bw462@cleveland.freenet.edu         - Fat Tony, "Bart the Murderer"
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: kessler@roses.Stanford.EDU (Will Kessler)
Subject: Hindu God Wearing Sunglasses, more
Organization: DSO, Stanford University
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 00:39:59 GMT

My roommate swears that the Hindu Elephant God in the 7-11 was
wearing sunglasses... any concurrence out there?


-- 
Will Kessler
kessler@roses.stanford.edu
Rehabilition Research Division
Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
Subject: Re: death
From: sbrack@jupiter (Steven S. Brack)
Date: 9 Oct 92 13:53:26 EST
Reply-To: sbrack@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu 
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

me.. LADA) (me..  LADA)) writes:
: 
: 	Hi don't think me rude, but what the hell is so great looking about 
: Brandon Walsh(or whatever his name is)  Please Be specific, demented minds 
: want 2 no?  
:                   

	Well, the fact that Jason Priestly (the actor who plays Brandon Walsh)
	is gay always helped me to appreciate his "good boy" looks. 
	Seriously, he has a very clean, wholesome, look about him.  When he 
	tries to, he can carry his "squeaky clean" image to extremes, but
	that's just another corny bit of this fairly corny series that I
	seem to enjoy anyway.  8)  

	Face it, we're safer with him acting than if he were using those looks
	to sell used cars or something.  8)


--
Steven S. Brack        |<lookin for a quote>|   sbrack@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu
2021 Roanwood Drive    \____________________/  STU0061@uoft01.BITNET 
Toledo, OH  43613-1605 /                    \    brack@uoftcse.cse.utoledo.edu 
+1 419 GR4 1010        |  MY OWN  OPINIONS  |   sbrack@maine.cse.utoledo.edu 
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
From: tl24@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Tami  Luhby)
Subject: Re: Regarding episode 10/7/92 's ending
Reply-To: tl24@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Tami  Luhby)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 00:19:48 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.224647.628@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> dvde_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (David Ettinger) writes:
>And now for the true grit of my little piece here:
>	Can you believe the way Dylan, Brenda and Donna were dancing together
>	at the end?!  What's up with that?!?!?!
>
>
>-- 
>=============================================================================
>dvde_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu
>    I too am not a bit tamed, I too am untranslatable,
>    I sound my barbaric yawp over the roofs of the world. -- Walt Whitman
I have to agree with you there.  Does anyone else see a little 2 on 1 going here?

I have to see that last night's episode was a little inventive.  The use of the narrative by Brandon was pretty cheesy.

But I thought the scene in the gym was pretty good.  There was alot of tension 
there and it actually seemed a little realistic.  However, within minutes it 
got stupid.  I thought that the "guys from shaw" had been drinking? they seemed
cool to me...but i think it was stupid how easily it was blown off.  

-tl24@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
From: mgustafs@desoto.Prime.Com
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
Subject: Re: My opinion of episode 10/07/92
Date: 8 Oct 92 17:17:36 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.062639.5578@ncsu.edu> drmellow@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Greg Cohoon) writes:

stuff deleted............

>                                         Let's face it, issues such as this
>cannot be accurately and completely covered in the space of a one-hour
>television show.
>
>-greg


Less 16 minutes per hour for advertising, no less.
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
From: alrosado@athena.mit.edu (Ani)
Subject: Brandon and Nikki
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 02:54:50 GMT


Why why why are these two going out???????????  he was a lot
better with Andrea, even if she IS annoying.  But Nikki is
pushy, annoying, and all wrong for him.  It looks staged.
I will grant however, that her clean-faced good looks are
a refreshing change from the loads of makeup Donna and
Andrea have been seen wearing.  And we won't even START with
Sue.  Oh well.

I think Brenda and Dylan should break up.  She annoys me and he
looks a lot better with Kelly.

oh well...just my two cents.

oh...and we all know who rules... KYLE!!!!!
(too bad he doesn't get much action)
Xref: sparky alt.tv.bh90210:237 rec.arts.tv.soaps:36829
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210,rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: 90210: Jason Priestly
From: sbrack@jupiter (Steven S. Brack)
Date: 9 Oct 92 14:14:16 EST
Reply-To: sbrack@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu 
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

U36345@uicvm.uic.edu (Lisa A. McGraw) writes:
: Well, I heard that he has been living with Christine Elise
: (the girl who played the psychotic "Emily" last season) for
: quite some time now.  I heard of plan for marriage, but I
: didn't know that it had actually happened.  Hope this gives
: you somewhat of a clue...
: 
: Lisa

	Oh come on!  Jason Priestley?  Married?!  To a woman??!!  I shudder
	at the thought.  No one who's spent as much time in the gay life
	as he has, & once professed, on national TV, that women weren't his
	interest, could *possibly* be believable as happily married to a 
	woman.  I mean, I knew he was an actor, but isn't that a bit of a
	stretch for him?  8)


--
Steven S. Brack        |<<<<<<quoteless>>>>>|   sbrack@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu
2021 Roanwood Drive    \____________________/  STU0061@uoft01.BITNET 
Toledo, OH  43613-1605 /                    \    brack@uoftcse.cse.utoledo.edu 
+1 419 GR4 1010        |  MY OWN  OPINIONS  |   sbrack@maine.cse.utoledo.edu 
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
From: ozcomert@wam.umd.edu (John Sedat Ozcomert)
Subject: Dylan and Kelly
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 02:24:14 GMT

This is posted for my wife, Rebecca.

In reference to the Peach Pit scene with Dylan and Kelly, it
is hard to believe that after their similar experiences and
compassion for each other that they would not have had a more
intimate encounter that evening.  I think they are much better suited
for each other than Brenda and Dylan, since Brenda has not 
experienced enough to really be her own person.

Aren't the writers of this show assigning a higher maturity level
to these high school kids than is typical of any high school kids
in the country?

-Rebecca


Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
From: larryr@saturn.sdsu.edu (Larry Riedel)
Subject: Re: Help Me Understand
Organization: San Diego State University, College of Sciences
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 22:25:36 GMT

 (U60829@uicvm.uic.edu) wrote:
> On my screen I see two groups, alt.tv.bh90210 and alt.tv.90210

alt.tv.90210 is for people who don't like the show, and alt.tv.bh90210
is for people who do like the show.

Feel free to read and post to the appropriate group.


Larry
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
Subject: Re: What's so good about Jason Priesley's looks? 
From: sbrack@jupiter (Steven S. Brack)
Date: 9 Oct 92 14:20:20 EST
Reply-To: sbrack@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu 
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

me.. LADA) (me..  LADA)) writes:
: 
: 	Hi don't think me rude, but what the hell is so great looking about 
: Brandon Walsh(or whatever his name is)  Please Be specific, demented minds 
: want 2 no?  
:                   

	Well, the fact that Jason Priestly (the actor who plays Brandon Walsh)
	is gay always helped me to appreciate his "good boy" looks. 
	Seriously, he has a very clean, wholesome, look about him.  When he 
	tries to, he can carry his "squeaky clean" image to extremes, but
	that's just another corny bit of this fairly corny series that I
	seem to enjoy anyway.  8)  

	Face it, we're safer with him acting than if he were using those looks
	to sell used cars or something.  8)


--
Steven S. Brack        |<lookin for a quote>|   sbrack@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu
2021 Roanwood Drive    \____________________/  STU0061@uoft01.BITNET 
Toledo, OH  43613-1605 /                    \    brack@uoftcse.cse.utoledo.edu 
+1 419 GR4 1010        |  MY OWN  OPINIONS  |   sbrack@maine.cse.utoledo.edu 

--
Steven S. Brack        | B0 w+f s+k+c+v a!v |   sbrack@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu
2021 Roanwood Drive    \____________________/  STU0061@uoft01.BITNET 
Toledo, OH  43613-1605 /                    \    brack@uoftcse.cse.utoledo.edu 
+1 419 GR4 1010        |  MY OWN  OPINIONS  |   sbrack@maine.cse.utoledo.edu
From: mgustafs@desoto.Prime.Com
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
Subject: Re: IS HILLS LOSING IT'S FLAIR?
Date: 7 Oct 92 12:58:08 GMT

In article <97770@bu.edu> camper@buphy.bu.edu (Dan English) writes:
>In article <92279.221914DNB102@psuvm.psu.edu> DNB102@psuvm.psu.edu writes:

	-- stuff deleted --

>
>  DONNA RULES!!!!!
>yes, she does!!!!!
>   -camper.
>.


NO..............

      .................. She does not!



Nikki Does!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: mgustafs@desoto.Prime.Com
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
Subject: Re: Regarding episode 10/7/92 's ending
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:08:21 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.224647.628@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> dvde_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (David Ettinger) writes:

	Stuff Deleted....

>
>And now for the true grit of my little piece here:
>	Can you believe the way Dylan, Brenda and Donna were dancing together
>	at the end?!  What's up with that?!?!?!
>=============================================================================
>dvde_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu


Ya..... I wondered about that too...... like, is he suggesting something?
Did ya notice the way they all smiled when he (attempted) to lift the both
of them (a weak attempt, at that)!?!?

Nikki RULES!!
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
From: tlsogg@athena.mit.edu (Tammy L Cagann)
Subject: Re: My opinion of episode 10/07/92
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 16:51:54 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.201357.24934@utdallas.edu>, goyal@utdallas.edu (Mohit K. Goyal) writes:
|> >that it was by far the best episode I've ever seen.  Why isn't it believable?
|> 
|> It was unbelievable how when the angry guys from WBH who wanted to start 
|> something with the guys from Shaw were right there with the angry guys from
|> Shaw, and all of a sudden, those two girls ask the guys to dance, and the
|> next thing you know the whole gym is doing some coordinated dance move.
|> 
|> 
|> 
I must also agree that the episode got a little hokey with the happily-ever-after
ending.  In their defense, though, that coordinated dance move was the "Electric
Slide"  A whole room full of people often break into it at these types of dances,
and in clubs as well, when the right song is played.

The spirit of the ending was good with kids trying to work together to bridge the
gaps and keep more of their friends from dying, but entertainment it is, so hokey
it was!

Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
From: tflynn@encore.com (Tonya Flynn)
Subject: Re: Help me understand
Organization: Encore Computer Corp., Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 20:04:30 GMT

In article <JAC.92Oct7143816@bowling.cis.ohio-state.edu> jac@cis.ohio-state.edu (Jim Clausing) writes:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, 6 Oct 1992 14:45:41 CDT, <U60829@uicvm.uic.edu> said:
>
>U60829> Help me understand something here.  Why is Brandon always complaining
>U60829> that he is out of money?  If his parents could afford to move to BH from
>U60829> the midwest then why don't they give him any?  What does Dad do?
>
>U60829> And why is there two BH90210 groups in alt.x
>
>Don't get me started again.  First, just because they moved doesn't
>mean they have money to burn (especially given the ridiculous cost of
>living in BH).  

Having moved from the midwest myself, I agree with you up to here.

>Also, even if they do, why should they GIVE him
>anything.  Some of us who grew up in the midwest never developed the
>attitude that we were OWED something just by virtue of our existence.
>If he wants money he should go out and earn it himself.  Besides, he
>is more likely to appreciate the value of money he earns himself.  Dad
>works in some sort of finance/banking/something...  Can't help you on
>the two groups question, this is the only one I've seen here.

I don't think this is the point.  I could agree with what you say except
for the fact that Brenda seems to be supported but not Brandon.  If Brandon
is expected to go out and earn spending money himself, why isn't Brenda? 

Tonya

                                       |
Tonya Flynn                           /|\         6901 W. Sunrise Blvd.
(305/797-2446)                       / | \        Ft. Lauderdale, Fl 33313
                                  ----------      UUCP:  uunet!gould!tflynn
                                    ------        INTERNET: tflynn@encore.com
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
From: larryr@saturn.sdsu.edu (Larry Riedel)
Subject: Re: Dylan and Kelly
Organization: San Diego State University, College of Sciences
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 22:04:29 GMT

John Sedat Ozcomert's wife Rebecca (ozcomert@wam.umd.edu) wrote:
> In reference to the Peach Pit scene with Dylan and Kelly, it
> is hard to believe that after their similar experiences and
> compassion for each other that they would not have had a more
> intimate encounter that evening.

Kelly's not going for it.  She is awesomely classy, and she's not
gonna let Dylan the sleaze get his paws on her, even if she has had
a major crush on him her entire life.  If he wanted her, he should
have iced Brenda as soon as she got back instead of trying to give
her a tonsillectomy every time he sees her.


>                                   I think they are much better suited
> for each other than Brenda and Dylan, since Brenda has not 
> experienced enough to really be her own person.

Experienced enough sleaze?  I'm not sure she would really WANT to be
her "own person" if that's what it takes.  My parents are still married,
and neither they nor I are alcoholics, convicts, or drug addicts, so it
looks like fortunately I'm not my own person either.


> Aren't the writers of this show assigning a higher maturity level
> to these high school kids than is typical of any high school kids
> in the country?

Yes, thank God they are.  It lets some of us (me) know that someone
realizes that there are people in high school who are as mature as
adults.  I don't really need TV programs to show me how immature
typical high school kids are, or that there are some real low life
people in Beverly Hills.  I know that already, and personally don't
find it very interesting.  I like having a show were we see that there
are some people in BH who are high-class morally and ethically and not
just economically.


BH90210 is clearly not a show about how the world sucks and everyone
in Beverly Hills is a scum with an unlimited supply of money.  If some
of us perceive that as unrealistic, then that's our prerogative, but
it doesn't make us right.


Larry
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210,rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: tl24@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Tami  Luhby)
Subject: Re: 90210: Jason Priestly
Reply-To: tl24@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Tami  Luhby)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 21:02:22 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.141417.10423@uoft02.utoledo.edu> sbrack@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu  writes:
>U36345@uicvm.uic.edu (Lisa A. McGraw) writes:
>: Well, I heard that he has been living with Christine Elise
>: (the girl who played the psychotic "Emily" last season) for
>: quite some time now.  I heard of plan for marriage, but I
>: didn't know that it had actually happened.  Hope this gives
>: you somewhat of a clue...
>: 
>: Lisa
>
>	Oh come on!  Jason Priestley?  Married?!  To a woman??!!  I shudder
>	at the thought.  No one who's spent as much time in the gay life
>	as he has, & once professed, on national TV, that women weren't his
>	interest, could *possibly* be believable as happily married to a 
>	woman.  I mean, I knew he was an actor, but isn't that a bit of a
>	stretch for him?  8)
>
>
>--
>Steven S. Brack        |<<<<<<quoteless>>>>>|   sbrack@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu
>2021 Roanwood Drive    \____________________/  STU0061@uoft01.BITNET 
>Toledo, OH  43613-1605 /                    \    brack@uoftcse.cse.utoledo.edu 
>+1 419 GR4 1010        |  MY OWN  OPINIONS  |   sbrack@maine.cse.utoledo.edu 

I dont want to sound homphobic cuz im not.  But where do you get this idea 
that Jason Priestly is gay? 

You are the only one who has posted messages to this affect.  If someone can
back this up, maybe.  But from the looks of it, I dont think its true.  Ive 
heard way more reports that he lives with Christine Elise.  Anyway.

-tl24@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
From: Sean D. Ackley <su@prag.com>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
Subject: Want synopsis of an episode.
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 92 09:25:27 PDT
Reply-To: su@prag.com (Sean D. Ackley)
Distribution: world
Organization: PRA Group International (510-732-9895)


I would like to get a full story synopsis, or an ftp site with this
information: (for at least this one episode, if not all of them)

The episode in which Kelly is in the shower and David walks in on her; 
and all the friends are discussing which colleges to go to. This would 
be the episode before the 10/7 episode.

thanks alot.  e-mail with replies

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
When the morning sun rises, the hawks fly free as the wind. -- r. hawk

MHS:  su@prag                  Compuserve:  70214,2111
                               FAX:         510-732-0289
rhawk@prag.com                 PRODIGY:     RWCR77A       FidoNet:
rhawk@prag.mhs.compuserve.com  AOL:         SACKLEY       1:161/450
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
From: pratten@csd.uwo.ca (A Warren Pratten)
Subject: Re: Dylan and Kelly
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London
Distribution: world 
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 17:01:57 GMT

In article <1992Oct10.055539.557@samba.oit.unc.edu> Bill.Mcdevitt@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Bill Mcdevitt) writes:
>
>Was it me, or did anyone else think that scene where Kelly and Dylian are
>taling in the Peach Pit was a little stilted....like they were 50 years
>old or something!!   I mean, it made it look as if she was a addict
>recovered and he was an X-convict!!      
> [other stuff deleted]

I thought that the producers missed a major opportunity with this scene.
Kelly and Dylan in the same place (alone) with the common understanding about
delinquent parents and the substance abuse thing (Dylan - alcohol, Kelly - ??).
Notice the tension when Kelly confronted Brenda about not having any idea
what it is like for her because she lives in "Walsh - land".  I figured that 
this would be the scene that put Dylan and Kelly together permanently.
But alas they end up going to the dance and partying with Brenda.

Has anyone else noticed how many differences are appearing between the
Dylan and Brenda characters' likes and dislikes?  They are quite obviously
setting up for a break up.  I thought for sure this was going to be it.

Damn I hate being teased like this.


-- 
A Warren Pratten
Email: Pratten@csd.uwo.ca
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Thursday, 15 Oct 1992 10:24:59 CDT
From: <U60829@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
Subject: Re: Help Me Understand

On my screen I see two groups, alt.tv.bh90210 and alt.tv.90210
Newsgroups: alt.tv.bh90210
From: goyal@utdallas.edu (Mohit K. Goyal)
Subject: Question
Organization: Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 20:16:40 GMT

Hello.

I just recently started watching 90210 and I am wondering why
Kelly and Donna's boyfriend(I forget his name) are living in
the same house>

Thnka.