HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson)
Subject: Re: Chuck Cecil in Pro Bowl???????
Reply-To: bergerson@mayo.edu
Organization: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 19:03:25 GMT



->Apparently you're too stupid to realize this Chad, but the NFL has the BEST way
->of choosing their all-pro team; the players vote.  If anyone knows that Cecil is
->the best safety in the conference, it's the players, not you.
->

Yes, I am very stupid and know nothing about football, Jeff.

1.  Cecil is not even close to being the best in the conference, let alone
the central division
2.  He is a cheap shot artist
3.  so, How many int's did he have this year???????



--
*******************************************************************************
Chad D. Bergerson                            Internet: bergerson@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic                                  Voice: (507) 255-7567
200 First Street SW                          FAX: (507) 255-5484
Mail Stop 2D-334 STM            "In my dream I was drowning my sorrows  
Rochester, MN  55905             But my sorrows they learned to swim..." - U2
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: MCMASTER@LSTC2VM.stortek.com (Jim McMaster)
Subject: Re: Forget Reeves What about the Broncos
Organization: StorageTek SW Engineering
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 16:22:45 GMT

In article <30DEC199200540930@cc.utah.edu>
djs1539@cc.utah.edu (SEGAL, DAVID JAY) writes:
 
>I don't think that Dan Reeves will have a problem finding a job, but who is
>going to go to Denver and coach the Broncos?  It's the team that I'm worried
>about.  Yes Dan was a GREAT coach,so who is left to come to Denver?  Shanahan?
>I don' think so.  Just because he was a friend of John's.  If he was such a
>good coach why was he let go?
 
Shanahan was let go *because* he is a good friend of Elway's.  IMAGINE!
The nerve of an offensive coordinator who goes behind the head coach's
back to discuss offensive plays with the starting quarterback!  In
Reeves' eyes, that was a firing offense!
 
>                               Wade, well maybe, then they'll be looking for a
>new defensive coash.
 
Yep, Wade Phillips is largely responsible for the Broncos winning the
games they have recently.  Reeves ran the terrible offense, while
Phillips kept the games close enough for the periodic bursts of Elway
magic.  I would rather see him stay as defensive coordinator, but if he
does not get the head job, he will almost certainly leave.
 
>                       t's all such a terrible mess!!!  I guess we should just
>sit tight and wait a couple of years until the Broncos get back on their feet,
>go to the SuperBowl and KICK SOME ASS!
>
Only of Bowlen is willing to open his somewhat deflated wallet in the
new age of free-agency.  Don't bet on it.  If Bowlen does not watch his
step, we could see the Denver Patriots sooner than another Super Bowl.
 
>Sheila Cobb
 
Jim McMaster
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Andrew Bros <bros@convex.COM>
Subject: Re: Minnesota Vikings - 1993 Schedule.
Originator: bros@neptune.convex.com
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 20:13:19 GMT
Reply-To: bros@convex.COM (Andrew Bros)
Organization: Convex Computer Corporation, Richardson, TX
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In article <1992Dec30.010117.6454@ultb.isc.rit.edu> vxb8773@ritvax.isc.rit.edu writes:
>the vikes schedule for next year is as follows:
>8 standard division games (2 each against GB, chicago, detroit, TB)
>since the finished 1st in their division, they will play the top 2
>teams in the other nfc divisions from this year.
>        (san fran, new orleans, dallas, and philadelphia)

  I understand this part.

>finally, they will play the top 4 afc west teams from this year.
>        (san diego, kc, la raiders, and denver)

  But why do the Vikes play four teams from one division in the AFC?
Or is it like that each year, and I've just never noticed?  Why not
mix it up and play a team from each division?
-- 
Andrew Bros                             bros@convex.com
System Integration Group                Convex Computer Corporation
It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations,
if you live near him.  - JRR Tolkien, The Hobbit.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: MVP
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 23:42:51 GMT

In article <1992Dec28.223124.3814@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
>>How isn't Young the best QB on his own team in 1992? You mean Bono plays
>>a better QB in 1992? or Montana plays the position better in 1992?
>
>Depends on who you talk to.  I'm not saying he's not the best this year.
>I'm saying that, depending on who you talk to, 
Well, it doesn't depend on who I talk to. I have not seen or heard anyone
saying that Bono/Montana PLAYED a better season than Young in 1992.

Unless you are talking about yourself.

>there are others who think
>that the other two QBs are just as good if not better.
But that has NOTHING to do with the 1992 MVP. "as good" is not the same as
"actually play as well on the field in 1992". MVP is earned on the field,
not on the bench.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
From: libr@rosie.uh.edu (Harvey Brauner)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: a billboard in houston
Date: 30 Dec 1992 10:23 CST
Organization: University of Houston
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: rosie.uh.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

In article <1hsea5INNegv@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds) writes...
>In article <C01zqr.CE@hpuerca.atl.hp.com> krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes) writes:
> >Only Houston fans would count injuries 9sad,, very sad)

You talking to me?!  I don't think so.

>The "Sign" is on a famous Mexican food eatery Papasito's it reads:
> 
>HOUSTON 27
>BUFFALO  3
>INJURIES 8
> 
>stuff deleted


Yeah, I saw the sign too...But I got a chuckle out of it.  My interpretation
was that they were counting TOTAL injuries on both sides.  Seeing how this
restaurant always puts up some weird and goofy saying every week I wouldn't
put to much into it.

>To voice your outrage call:
> 
>The Houston Oilers
>1-(713)797-9111
> 
>Papasitos Cantina
>1-(713)668-5756

While your at it order the Fajita Special...I hear it's really good :)

>And people ask me why Im a Dallas fan here in Houston ?
>I rest my case......
> Go Cowboys !!!!!!
>tim

What case? 

         Harvey Brauner - libr@jetson.uh.edu  | Systems Department    
                          crunge@menudo.uh.edu| Univeristy Libraries  
                                              | University of Houston
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 49ers ( what years did they win the Superbowl?)
Date: 24 Dec 92 02:11:26 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Dec24.011628.150897@zeus.calpoly.edu> mrodrigu@hertz.elee.calpoly.edu (Mark Rodriguez) writes:
>
> In what years and what number (ie XXIV) did teh 49ers win the superbowl
>in the 80's?
>
>Thanks
>Mark

XVI in 1982: SF vs. Cincy- both teams coming off losing seasons make it to the
	Super Bowl.  Joe Montana introduced to the world as one of the best.
	SF held a 20-0 lead and it looked like it would be a blowout but then
	Cincy came out with 2 TDs.  2 Ray Wershing FGs put the game out of 
	reach. Bengals outgained the Niners but had 4 turnovers. The highlight
	of the game was a goal line stance by the Niners defense to hold off
	the Cincy comeback.

XIX in 1985: SF vs. Miami- the old order vs. the new kids on the block. SF
	blew them out 38-16.  The Niner defense was all over Marino all day,
	sacking him 4 times and picking him off twice. Montana had a GREAT
	game throwing for 300+ yards and three touchdowns passes and a TD run.

XXIII in 1989: SF vs. Cincy- still stands as one of my favorites because of
	the final drive by Montana that set up the winning TD.  SF won 20-16
	but Cincy gave them a great game.  This was the year of the Ickey
	shuffle and Boomer's coming of age. Good defenses (Cincy sacked 5 
	times and Niner 4).  The 92 yard drive including a spectacular catch
	by Rice for a major gain were the definite highlights.

XXIV in 1990: SF vs. Denver- SF won 55 to 10! Montana had FIVE (count 'em 5)
	TD passes. The niner defense sacked Elway 4 times and picked him
	off twice. This was probably the most talented Niner team of all
	(but you won't get any arguments from me on this). Montana becomes
	the first three time MVP for Super Bowl.


satish nair
giants (is he gone yet?)


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: twolf@cs.utah.edu (Tom Wolf)
Subject: Re: 49ers/Cowboys :QB problems? Thoughts?
Date: 29 Dec 92 16:53:10 MST
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept

In article <1992Dec29.144258.4776@admin1.memst.edu> jasmith@admin1.memst.edu (John) writes:
>      I watched the 49ers game Monday night against Detroit. Barry Sanders
>      looked good, he rushed for 100+ yards.  I'm not a Barry Sanders fan,
>      either.  But am curious about the 49ers defensive.  How do you 
>      49er fans think your defensive matchs up with the Cowboys.  Do you think
>      Sanders had a great day or an average day against the 49ers?  How do 
>      you think they'll do against Emmitt Smith?  Do you think he'll run
>      loose through your secondary like Sanders did?

Nope, I don't think Smith will. If you noticed, the 49ers were playing a
special defense Monday night. A 4-1-6, designed to stop the pass generated
by the run and shoot. They were basically daring the Lions to run, by taking
all but 1 of their linebackers out. This allowed Sanders to run. The 49ers
have played 3 run and shoot games this year (the other two against Atlanta).
With their 4-1-6 package, they have stuffed the run and shoot. They have never
used this defense against a non-run and shoot team, so I doubt the Cowboys
will see it. Thus, don't expect Smith to run around like Sanders.

In fact, with the Cowboy's, I would expect the 49ers to try to shut down
Smith and let Aikman throw. Just the opposite of Monday's game. As for
whether the 49ers have a chance against Dallas, sure. Does Dallas have
a chance of meeting the 49ers? I don't know. I think New Orleans could
beat Dallas, we already know Philly can. I would rather the 49ers play
Dallas than either Philly or New Orleans.

Tom Wolf






Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: metv@triton.unm.edu ()
Subject: Sleepers 
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 18:02:39 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Distribution: usa

Well the Browns are out and Eagles are in.  It was not the way I predicted, but
it was very close.    

Redskins - If Redskins have a better quarterback like Young, Montana, or Marino,they would win the game.  I'm not saying that Rypien is bad; he's an average 
QB.  Next Week, Raiders at home, they should win this one.  I'm a Redskins fan
but I don't really think that they are a threat to Niners and Cowboys.

Packers - This is a team that I want see in playoff.  Now it's down to Skins
and them.  I want to see Packers go because they deserve it.  They have playing
well and winning the important game.  They would be a good match up for
either the Cowboys or Niners.  Next week, they play Vikes away from home; but
they should win this one.  It would be a more meaningful game if the Vikes 
lost last Sunday.  I know that the Steelers would win if they have O'Donnell.

Eagles - Congraduation ! Now I hope they would lose the Giants next week; so
the Packs would go to playoff.

Chargers - They should win the division playing Seahawks next week.  This is
the team that I think can beat the Steelers or Bills for the AFC championship.
       
Metro 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske)
Subject: Re: Vikes KILL the Pack
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 17:10:29 GMT
Keywords: Vikes win, the Pack LOSES

tkelsey@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (todd.p.kelsey) writes:

>Your seeing the NFL through purple glasses if you think Philadelphia
>and Houston's pass rushes aren't as good as the Vikings.  This isn't
>to say that the Vikings don't have an outstanding pass rush.  The point
>of my original post is that the Packers have faced teams with excellent
>pass rushes before and have done just fine.  The Vikings rush was
>not the reason why they won yesterday (they only had one sack).  It 
>was their ability to stop the run and the Packers inability to stop
>anything that provided the outcome.

>-Todd

I really don't feel that the Vikes pass rush is that good against a good
offensive line, but I don't think it can be said that the Vikings' rush 
was NOT the reason why they beat the Pack.  Maybe I'm wrong, but on TV
it did look like the Vikes pressured Favre into throwing the ball quickly
and off balance a few times.  I seem to remember that one of those times
he was intercepted.  

John Ganske

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: Low SAQ play by SF 49ers + Giants!
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 21:15:46 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.181219.7936@sequent.com> newson@sequent.com (Newson) writes:

>In article <1992Dec20.064333.10694@serval.net.wsu.edu> jjungbau@luke.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer) writes:

>>In article <1992Dec20.055551.17111@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:

>>>kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi) writes:

>>>>  If you are going to pass, try a higher 
>>>>  percentage play than the fly to Rice.

>>>If you're going to criticize coaches, try picking up on somebody 
>>>whose winning percentage is slightly lower than Seifert. 

>I have to agree! This was a BONEHEAD CALL! I don't think Seifert was calling
>the plays though, although he is ultimately responsible. A running play, or
>high percentage pass in-bounds would've made alot more sense.

It's so easy to second-guess late-game play calling.  The Niners were
trying to take the Bucs by surprise, and had they succeeded, would have
put the game out of reach.  Did you watch the Jets-Fins game?  NY had
that game won with a first down at the end, but they got too conservative
and ran three running plays.  Three and out, and Marino had enough time
to march downfield and set up the game-winning FG.
-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
From: toma@db.TC.Cornell.EDU (Rory Toma)
Subject: Re: Dan Reeves has been fired!
Organization: Not bloody likely around here!
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 22:04:42 GMT


   That's right, just heard on the radio that Bolen fired Dan Reeves.
   No word on new head coach yet, but look out 49ers, I'm sure we're 
   interested in Shanahan.  or maybe Wade Phillips will be moved up.


Maybe Dan Reeves would like to live in Phoenix, Arizona.
--
toma@tc.cornell.edu	rory@foopub.tucson.az.us
You want me to upgrade to System what?
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Dallas Cowboys Schedule '93
Date: 29 Dec 1992 19:48:31 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu


Dallas Cowboys -- 1993 Schedule
 
Home: San Francisco, Green Bay, Buffalo, NY Jets.

Away: Minnesota, Atlanta, Miami, Indianapolis.

Plus the usual Washington, Philly, Phoenix and the G-Men twice each.


"You have just seen the "Killer Whale" probably for the first, and last time"
                         
                   Russell Maryland after his TD Belly flop in the Endzone
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: loffit@wam.umd.edu (Dixie Cup)
Subject: 'Twas NBC Re: Raiders vs. Redskins (CBS' unprofessionalism)
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 02:16:59 GMT

In article <Bzw5B5.33n@acsu.buffalo.edu> kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) writes:
>After Washington's touchdown that put them in the lead 20-14 in the fourth
>quarter, CBS displayed the words to "Hail to the Redskins" while the
>Redskins' marching band played the song. I thought that NFL football
>coverage was supposed to be unbiased. I guess I was wrong. This was a very
>unprofessional move by CBS.
>
>Final Score:
>LA         21
>Washington 20
>
>Disclaimer: I am neither a Raiders fan nor a Redskins fan, but I am a Bills
>fan.

It was NBC, not CBS.  I am a Redskins fan and also believe they were very
unproffesional.  It was obvious from the pre-game show that the announcers
were biased towards Washington.  In my opinion NBC has the worst football
coverage of the three non-cable networks (ESPN is THE worst; ought to
axe Theismann).  Just my opinions, nothing more.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: danp@sabre.bellcore.com (Daniel Pomplun)
Subject: Re: Detailed Playoff Picture [LONG]
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 92 14:26:59 GMT


>Here we go! You wrote:
>
>>Houston (9-6)  Buffalo
>>
>>	loss & Denver win				- WC2
>
>and then
>
>>Denver (8-7)  at Kansas City
>>
>>	win & Houston loss				- WC2
>
>Obviously they (Houston & Denver) can't both have WC2. If Houston
>loses, they will be WC3, indipendently from Denver@KC game.

Good work!

Houston should read:

Houston (9-6)  Buffalo

        win & Miami win                                 - WC2
        win & Miami loss & Denver win                   - WC2
        win & Miami loss & KC win & SD loss             - WC2
        win & Miami loss & KC win & SD win              - WC3
        loss                                            - WC3


Daniel Pomplun, Bellcore, danp@sabre.bellcore.com
Phone:  (908) 758-2740  Fax: (908) 758-4268
331 Newman Springs Rd, Red Bank, NJ 07701-7020,  MS: NVC-1E246
From: syang@rossini.eng.uci.edu (Guess)
Subject: Playoff
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 21 Dec 92 22:14:44 GMT
Distribution: usa

NFC:
already in: SF,DAL,MIN,NO,PHIL
GB is in playoff if	GB wins AND (phil or wash loses) 
WASH is in playoff if	GB loses OR (wash and phil wins)

Of course, my Dallas Cowboys clinches Division title and bye with win over
atlanta or chicago.

AFC:
already in: BUF,PIT,SD,MIA,HOU
who ever wins KC vs Den game is in playoff.

I think this is right.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Re: AFC vs. NFC drivel
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 18:18:50 GMT

tobias@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Steve Tobias) writes:
> [...] the NFC (excuse me Mr Anal Retentive, make that NFL) [...]
>AFC/AFL (are you happy now?) 

Oh, I didn't mean to strike such a raw nerve.  What's your problem,
Stevie Boy?  Santa didn't get you the golf video that you wanted so
much?  Or is it just the spirit of the holidays that makes you so
polite and friendly?

Anyway, I wouldn't dare to cross such a fine human being such as you,
Stevie Dear.  So if you want to count the 70's Steelers as an NFC
team, be my guest.

Happy new year, Steve.  Be fruitful and multiply.


--Gidi



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: barnes@cowboys.esd.sgi.com (James Barnes)
Subject: Where will Joe go?
Keywords: Audition
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:47:30 GMT

Montana sure looked good in his audition Monday night.
In fact, he looked GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where is he going to be playing next year?

L. A. Raiders??
Nah....

My guess is:       Minnesota



Happy New Year !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Playoffs: Philly at NewOrleans
Date: 28 Dec 92 18:50:44 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <258gwB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> corleone@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Daniel Marsalone) writes:
>
>     From what I've seen today (Eagles vs. Giants), the Eagles look 
>pretty weak. Also, the New Orleans offense seems to be non existant.
>I was just wonderinghow some of you people out side of the New Orleans 
>area perceive the Saints as a team and their offense in particular.
>  
>    Daniel Marsalone

Well I'm not an Eagle or a Saints fan but here's how I see things.  The
Saints have a fierce pass rush.  If the Eagles want to score against
them, Kotite will have to exploit their speed and have Randall run a lot
of naked bootlegs.  Expect a lot of scrambling from Randall.  On the Saints
side, the Eagles front four will stop the running game (as they did aginst the
Giants) however, their secondary is very susceptible to play action fakes
and such.  If the Saints want to win, Hebert will have to air out the ball
and expect his receivers to actually start catching some catchable passes.
If it comes down to a field goal, Morten Anderson will get the job done\
(Ruzek had a blocked FG this past week and a couple of difficult misses
against the Skins).

satish nair
ray is gone!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lewis@aera8700.mitre.org (Keith Lewis)
Subject: Re: Playoffs: Philly at NewOrleans
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
    <1992Dec29.122002.692@totaltec.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 14:37:18 GMT

In article <1992Dec29.122002.692@totaltec.com>, mark@totaltec.com writes:
>In article <258gwB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us>, corleone@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Daniel Marsalone) writes:
>>      From what I've seen today (Eagles vs. Giants), the Eagles look 
>> pretty weak. Also, the New Orleans offense seems to be non existant.
>> I was just wonderinghow some of you people out side of the New Orleans 
>> area perceive the Saints as a team and their offense in particular.

Their offense is tough but not top-notch.  The defense is probably the best
in the league.  They very consistent in their effort.  Unfortunately, the
49ers seem to have their number, and the only way they can avoid playing
them is if the Redskins knock them off first (highly unlikely).  

>Well I'm from the Philly area and I perceive the Saints in general to be a
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^
I think he meant the civilized world.  :^)  

>bunch of no-nothing,wimp assholes who couldn't play there way out of a wet
>paper bag!!!

I can still see the burn-in on my terminal screen -- THE EAGLES WILL GO 16-0
AND WIN THE SUPERBOWL!!!

>GO EAGLES!!!
          and take your obnoxious fans with you!

Keith Lewis             klewis@mitre.org          "Mr. Cheap"
I don't dance to music; music dances to me.  Email me for my PGP key.
The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer.
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.pro:30449 alt.internet.services:2177
From: alans@ll.mit.edu (Alan Jay Stein)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,alt.internet.services
Subject: Where/When can I get Vegas Spreads for NFL Playoffs?
Date: 29 Dec 92 18:51:09 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: M.I.T. Lincoln Lab - Group 43

Are the Vegas spreads posted regularly to any newsgroups, or available
via FTP or a telnet-able interactive thing somewhere? Also, what day
of the week do they usually come out? 

Please email a copy if posting a reply - our newsfeed goes south all
too often.  Thanks in advance.
--
Alan J.Stein             MIT/Lincoln Laboratory             alans@ll.mit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: merrill@stsci.edu (Clark Merrill)
Subject: Re: Redskins hopes
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.50    
Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:45:00 GMT

In article <1992Dec31.113413.587@hnrc.tufts.edu>, rob@hnrc.tufts.edu writes...
> 
>Did Joe Gibbs lose three in a row this year ?  If not, has he ever ?

He started 0-5 on the way to an 8-8 first season.

Clark B. Merrill
Space Telescope Science Institute
Baltimore, Maryland
merrill@stsci.edu