From: bufalini@beyond.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Subject: Re: Troll's programming skills (was Re: [a bunch of other shit])
X-Roger-Taylor-Quote: Don't get into religion, it tends to fuck people up.
X-Backmasking-Message: steliot sevol ylleK kciR
X-Advertisement: Buy a Honda.
X-Bruce-Bufalini-Quote: Better to get laid than laid off.
X-Political-Statement: K e n   R o b i n s o n for President in 2032.
Reply-To: bufalini@beyond.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
X-Whoosh: WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH
Organization: Pep$i $tate Univer$ity
X-Subliminal-Message: IBM 370 assembler sucks big time.
X-Oggle: OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 22:25:17 GMT

In article <robinson-290792092921@psy7.psy.utexas.edu>, robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu (John G. Robinson) writes:
>In article <u631Hbc_r8@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@cattycorner.gis.psu.edu
>(Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>
>> You are quite misinformed, for I do possess writing capabiliities and I am not
>> a computer.
>> 
>
>Simple denial subroutine (sub3).  Maybe the other two are broken...

It was a simple statement containing true, valuable information.

>> Ammonia enema is irrelevant, for my mind is perfectly clear.  It appears that
>> you are in need of your own advice, Mr. Robinson.
>> 
>
>Ah, no, there's sub1.  I feel relieved now.

Good; the ammonia enema apparently worked on you.  Don't count on having a clear
mind for very long.

>> You couldn't respond to that one because you know Troll has many victories
>> against Bur and Bur is a sore loser, just like I am making you a sore loser.
>> 
>
>I don't know who this Bur fellow is, nor could I possibly care less.  It's
>obvious, though, that Troll couldn't flame his way out of a paper bag
>soaked in kerosene, so it's a safe bet that if Bur or anyone else took him
>on, they made Troll look like the complete and utter ass he is.  It's just
>so darned easy!

Even if you don't know him, just imagine an individual who shares something
with you: a negative IQ.  He also shares your title of an ultimate loser in
alt.flame.

>> Time to inform Mr. Robinson, although it will probably never get through to
>> his sorry excuse for a brain:
>> 
>> 1. I possess no subroutines.
>> 
>
>Au contraire; they are quite obvious.  I've even pointed the most glaring
>ones out to you; I could probably recreate the entire program, but that
>would be an abysmal waste of time.

They are not obvious for they do not exist.  Go back to studying Freud and his
misinformed followers.

>> 2. You have no evidence linking me with number 1.
>> 
>
>Ah, but I do.  (See below.)

Ah, but you don't, for it is nowhere in this post.

>> 3. My brain is fully functional, unlike yours.
>> 
>
>Well, even if you are talking about your silicon chips and circuit boards,
>it's still pretty plain that it is far from functional.

John, every human being has a brain.  The problem is that the vast majority of
individuals do not know how to utilize this particular body organ.  You appear
to be one of these individuals.  When you learn how to use it (perhaps using a
tutorial), then you will be able to think and converse more effectively.

>> 4. alt.support.fucking.losers is irrelevant, for I do not require the helping
>> hand from anyone, especially from nonexistent organizations.
>> 
>
>Denial is the first symptom of addiction, as they say, and you seem to be
>heavily addicted to making an ass of yourself.  Please get help; a
>microprocessor is a terrible thing to waste.

I am not denying anything; I am only correcting your misinformed
considerations.

>> 5. My statements are the complete truth; perhaps you would like to prove
>> otherwise.
>> 
>
>Ah.  The proof.  Every day for the past few days I have flayed the epoxy
>skin off of you around 10 a.m., and every day by 5 I have received a
>half-assed rebuttal.  Then, all of a sudden, Troll reappears on the scene,
>and "Bruce" is gone.  What happened to Bruce's 5:00 inanity?  Simple. 
>Troll powered you down when he returned from whatever sick perversion he
>had been involved in.  Now he is gone and you are back.  Apparently after I
>knocked his dick in the dirt he turned you back on and left.
>
>You may not realize that you are, indeed, a computer program (and a poor
>one at that), and for this I pity you.  Perhaps if you process the above
>data, you will have a better grasp on reality.

And you may not realize that you are surrounded by a vast array of
misinformation.  As I said before, please obtain facts before making
unwarranted extrapolations.  K e n   R o b i n s o n may also be able to
assist you in becoming informed.

>> You are misinformed, for I have infinite amounts of logic.
>> 
>
>Nothing that has manifested itself thus far, I'm afraid.  You do, however,
>seem to have an infinite capacity for taking abuse.

What abuse?  I have never been abused by anyone.  If you cannot understand
simple statements, then take a one-way trip to rec.building.things.with.legos
or alt.tinkertoys.

>> Bruce does not "suck up" to people.  Bruce informs people of their misinformed
>> ways.  Your misinformation is abundant and quite amusing.
>> 
>
>You apparently aren't programmed to realize that your whole purpose in life
>is to suck up to Troll.  I hope he's off working on a new, improved version
>of you (assuming he can keep his hands off of his dick long enough).

I am not aware of your consideration, for it is an unwarranted extrapolation.
Perhaps you should have your hands on his dick, since you are so fond of the
idea.

>> You have not made any intelligent statements.  How could anybody understand
>> you?  Do you always post/talk/live your life with both feet in your mouth?
>> Apparently so.
>> 
>
>It doesn't surprise me that you don't understand me;  you lack the
>capacity.

No, you lack the ability to make even the simplest sounds.  Sentence structure
is way out of your league.

>> The only time it will beat a Honda is in a race to the junkyard, for Hondas
>> will last much longer than 100,000 miles, unlike your stupid, overwheight, 
>> ugly, American (your version of American) cars.  Toyotas also have life
>> expectancies and flawless repair records similar to Hondas.
>> 
>
>Ah, yes.  My first car was a Toyota.  Burned enough oil to have staved off
>the energy crunch.  I sold it for $50 at 45,000 miles.

John, every car comes with standard equipment called "The Owner's Manual."
The owner's manual informs you when to change the oil and perform other
scheduled maintenance.  Oil changes should occur every 3 months or 3,000
miles, whichever comes first.  Looks like your car has needed an oil change
for at least 45,000 miles.  Looks like your piece of shit Ford is only worth
$50.

>> There are no facts relevant to this thread in Transylavania.  You still seem
>> to be quite confused.  You have nothing at all to do with your time, for you
>> are extremely worthless.
>> 
>
>Confused?  No.  Perhaps you meant confusing to you?

No, confusion is the central part of your sorry excuse for a life.  Get the
facts straight.

>> I didn't drop out of the race, for I was never in it.
>> 
>
>But "Bruce," you are in second place behind Troll!  Pretty good for a
>machine, I think.  You should reconsider.

You should reconsider your assertion, for it is invalid because you are the
only candidate.

>> No, all I have to do is look at your posts to see someone more stupid than Bur
>> or even Patrick L. (Lameflame) Humphrey.
>> 
>
>Ah.  Too scared to check the mirror.  That's all right.  I understand.

No, checking the mirror for stupidity is unnecessary, for I have the
intelligence of a genius.  Your posts are the only evidence I need.

>> No, I am under the impression that you are still taking things very seriously.
>> Like I said before, people who take things seriously in .flame groups lack
>> lives.  You require a life.
>> 
>
>As I said before, computers know nothing about life.  Perhaps you should
>explain why I should listen to your boring shit at all (I'm beginning to
>wonder).

You seem to be quite misinformed, for I know more about life than you could
ever dream of.  You wouldn't know reality if it hit you between your eyes.

>> Assemblers are irrelevant.
>> 
>
>Bruce's posts are filled with non sequiturs.

Robinson's posts are filled with unwarranted extrapolations.

>> As I said before, I am not a computer and thus not in need of wishing for
>> humanity.
>
>See above re: denial and need for proof.

See this statement: irrelevant and irrelevant.

>> You certainly took my response about your being in stitches very seriously.
>> Therefore, you are still lacking a life.  I know more about life than you
>> could ever dream of knowing.
>> 
>
>See above re: computers and their knowledge of life.

See above re: irrelevant and irrelevant.

>> It means that your arguements about Pinnochio and all the other irrelevant
>> things were quite lame and have nothing to do with me.  You have again
>> forgotten the Ultimate Law: Initiate a thought process before posting.
>> 
>
>You have again forgotten "Ultimate Law" number two:  "initiate logic
>recognition routine before reading."

Ultimate Law number two occurs continuously.  Where have you been?
Masturbating in Momma's hamper?  Of course; it's the only way for you to get
anything resembling a thrill.

-- 
Bruce A. Bufalini (bufalini@gis.psu.edu)  |   In the Basement Bars,
PSU Geographic Information Systems        |   In the Backs of Cars,
                                          |   Be Cool or Be Cast Out.
                                          |
                                          |     -Neil Peart, 1982