HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: allanc@cs.su.oz.au (Restless Wanderer)
Subject: Re: "Cheating" Aussie umpires?
Reply-To: allanc@cluster.cs.su.oz (Restless Wanderer)
Organization: Basser Dept of Computer Science, University of Sydney, Australia
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 23:23:59 GMT

In article <92345.125742SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu> Spaceman Spiff <SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>my point is that if the umpire could not see the attempted stumping, how could
>he give the batsman out? the umpire cannot assume that the stumping was done
>fairly. note- the operative phrase is "could not see". if, however, he did see
>the "stumping" and in his opinion it was done fairly, then he's justified in
>declaring the batsman out. the batsman MUST get the benfit of the doubt.

Hey,give me a break.Did you see the incident? Did you see it at normal speed.?
Did you see the real SLOMO replay?
I saw them all and I gave him out on each ocassion.My doubts were raised when
an EXTRA SLOW motion showed the ball missing the leg stump.Sure the bails were
broken,Healy was on his back sacing the stumps so he wouldn't know
whether the batsman had made his ground.
It was  a mistake but in that flash,I swear I'd still give him out.
Could not see.... now lets see how this works.Prue 'claimed ' he saw tha bails
broken BEFORE the bat was grounded,he didn't say he didn't see.Healy said at
the time he didn't know and left it to the umpire.He gave out,so in hindsight
he made an error....but Cheating Aussie Umpires.....
How many times has Javed Miandad been given out LBW in Pakistan ? cf the
number of times he gets LBW'd in any other country....


******************************************************************************
* Allan Creighton           "There are important matters to be resolved here *
* Dept of Computer Science   and the fear of being hanged on a democratic    *
* University of Sydney       gallows will delay me until next spring"        *
******************************************************************************
From: jawad@ecst.csuchico.edu (Jawad Ali)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: after 40 (aint_nothin_shakin' kind of a day :(
Date: 13 Dec 92 06:35:53 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico
NNTP-Posting-Host: cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu


Aus 168/1 with about 8 overs left.
Looks like they are home.



"some days it's ham and bacon
other days aint nothin shakin' "
		- Blues giant B.B. King


j n a
From: leanne@DIALix.oz.au (Leanne Archer)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: W.Aust. could not win? (was: Domestic Aussie Results)
Date: 15 Dec 1992 12:49:33 +0800
Organization: DIALix Services, Perth, Western Australia
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.dialix.oz.au
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.4.19 #1

In <1992Dec15.013332.20563@ucc.su.OZ.AU> mikef@dph1.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Blind Boy Grunt) writes:

>Tim Astley wrote:

>>In the Sheffield Shield....

>...some stuff deleted...

>>AT the WACA SA made 409 and Geoff Marsh gave up with WA at 6/304. SA with 
>								   ^^^^^^^
>>Siddons making a century look like the only possible winners in this game.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Well, Tim. You didn't think any self-respecting Sandgroper would allow you
>to get way with that comment did you? :-) Of course, it is now well known 
>that Sth.Aust set West.Aust 390 runs to win off 76 overs, and West.Aust 
>achieved the target with poise and applomb, and with three wickets to
>spare. Marsh and Langer scored heavily, but I still haven't seen the
>scorecard.

>There were about 1400 runs scored in the 4 days of this Shield match, a
>phenomenal average of 350 runs per day. On the last day, there were about
>460 runs scored with 10 wickets falling. Wish I had been there...

     You missed a great game! ;-) Marsh deserves to be back in the Test
  team after his performance!!! 

     Anyone want me to post the score card?
 
>__
>Michael Fahey         | Internet: mikef@dph1.health.su.oz.au
>Dept of Public Health | UUCP: uunet!munnari.oz.au!dph1.health.su!mikef
>University of Sydney  | Bitnet: mikef%dph1.health.su.oz.au@cunyvm.bitnet

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |      _                                 Ms. Leanne Archer             |
  |    _//                                                               |
  |    /    _  __.  ____  ____  _       email: leanne@DIALix.oz.au       |
  |   /___ </_(_/|_/ / <_/ / <_</_                                       |
  ________________________________________________________________________
From: karnik@cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Using Dougie
Keywords: Dougie
Date: 17 Dec 92 17:52:42 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota

In <1992Dec17.141228.29773@cunews.carleton.ca> jnash@alfred.carleton.ca (John Nash) writes:

>I can get Dougie to run as a slave, but not to ksrao's account.  I got it
>to work to the gentleman in myria.cs.umn.edu last night.  Previously,

	Gentleman?? ME ?? :->

>version and installed that.  It seems to work fine, but I can't "quit" or
>"help".  When I ^C out, it reconnects, so I have to ^Z out and kill -9 the
>process... sorry if it upsets any applecart.

	When I press ^C TWICE in succession, it does quit, so try that.


>Please, note: these are not bitches, just bug reports (in my hands), and I
>like the idea of Dougie!

	Another report from me: I couldn't find the new version of
'dougie' in ford.ee... as Pieter advertised. It's still dougie-0.0 alpha
:-)


>John


       +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
       | Neeran M. Karnik | #2 fan of Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar on r.s.c.  :-> |
       | Dept. of CompSci.| "Welcome to r.s.c.,                              |
       | U of Minnesota   |  where jingoism rules the netwaves" - McBean :-> |
       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: aamir@cs.sfu.ca (Aamir Husain)
Subject: Pak vs WI WSC
Keywords: cricket stopped :-(
Organization: CSS, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 01:58:49 GMT

rain has stopped play, bad light is stopping play from 
resuming.

Wi were 118/5 in 34 overs
richardson is still there on 49 no :-(

will post an update as soon as the match starts, 
incredibly i am actually picking up 21740 right now

Aamir
From: karnik@cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: India - SA 6th ODI Update
Date: 17 Dec 92 17:57:52 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota


SA batted first and scored 216/8 in their 50 overs. Wessels made 78 and
Kirsten 44. Kapil took 3 for 23 in 10 overs.

In reply India made a very slow start (so what's new?) and have now lost
both openers, Prabhakar for 21 and Jadeja for 12. Manjrekar and Azhar are
batting with 6 each, and the score is 54/2 in close to 20 overs.

Finger karnik@myria.cs.umn.edu to get the latest score or for the dougie port
number if you have dougie.


       +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
       | Neeran M. Karnik | #2 fan of Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar on r.s.c.  :-> |
       | Dept. of CompSci.| "Welcome to r.s.c.,                              |
       | U of Minnesota   |  where jingoism rules the netwaves" - McBean :-> |
       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Subject: Pak/WI from finger
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 08:38:56 GMT
Reply-To: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

   I was not fast enough on Dougie and I could not monitor the postings. The
scores are obtainable by finger from:

sankara@plains.nodak.edu

ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu     or
ksrao@energy.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu

I will be updating them every five overs or more frequently in case the game
gets more exciting.


K. Sankara Rao                          e-mail k.srao@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu

Department of Electrical Engineering
Fargo, ND 58105  USA

Phone:  (701)237-7217  (o)
        (701)235-9912  (h)

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: astley@franklin.cc.utas.edu.au ()
Subject: Domestic Aussie Results
Organization: Computing Centre, University of Tasmania, Australia.
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 01:27:39 GMT

Some VERY brief scores from down under!

In the Mercantile Mutual one Day Domestic Competition....

At the Devonport Oval (North West Tasmania) the Victorians got 222 from 49 overs
led by Lehmann who got 76 from 94 balls. The Tasmanian's then blew a good
start to be all out for 164 with Dodemaide getting 3 for 11 from 8 overs.

In the Sheffield Shield....

At the SCG. Qld got 447 and in reply NSW made 382 with McNamara making 98 n/o
and with Tasmanian reject Robertson making 48 the tail wagged somewhat.
Qld in their second dig is 6/134 with Freedman having 3/36 and Robertson 3/56.
The ball is turning square so a result looks likely with one day left.

AT the WACA SA made 409 and Geoff Marsh gave up with WA at 6/304. SA with 
Siddons making a century look like the only possible winners in this game.

In the annual ACT v TAS under 16 games Tas made 178 (Lamp 65, Priest 40, Voros
4/36 and J. Edwards 2/50) and ACT made 5/207 (Gambale 102 n/o, Meredith 2/38)

Tim
--
Tim Astley      | Address : 1/16 Wallace Ave., Lenah Valley, Hobart,Tas. 7008
Chemistry Dept. |     or   astley@tasman.cc.utas.edu.au
Uni. of Tasmania|     or   phone (002) 202158 (work) (002) 280829 (home)
From: reddyc@research.CS.ORST.EDU (Chandra Reddy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Kirsten's run-out, Mankading in general
Date: 11 Dec 92 21:35:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: flop.1gb1jtINNej9
Distribution: world
Organization: Computer Science Department, Oregon State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: hume.cs.orst.edu

In article <1992Dec11.175839.1636@walter.bellcore.com>, shamim@bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi) writes:
|> My two cents worth on the matter of Kapil mankading Kirsten etc:
|> 
|> What is interesting about this incident is not whether Kirsten was
|> stealing a run or not. Obviously the umpire gave him out so he was out
|> of his crease. And of course we all know that bowlers seldom use this
|> tactic. What is interesting is that a player of the stature and nature
|> of Kapil does something like this. It can only mean that Kapil is
|> getting extremely frustrated, and if so, then the whole Indian team
|> must be feeling that way. This spells disaster for the Indian side and
|> it would not be surprising to see sweeping changes in the side for the
|> series against England.

I agree with you that when a player of Kapil's stature -- as a great
player and as a good sportsman -- "resorts" to something that is
"unsportive", there should be a reason. But I feel your speculation
of the reason may be taking things too far. In my own bowling 
experience, I lose my concentration when the non-striker takes off
as I am delivering the ball. I try not to be bothered by it. However,
if the non-striker's motions are very exaggerated, I get irritated.
I surmise similar thing to have happened with Kapil. Being a sportive 
guy he is, he warned Kirsten "twice".  I feel the reason is, mainly,
irritation with the non-striker taking off early even after repeated
warnings, and not frustration with teams performace.  

Considering the level of cricket being played, Kirsten ought to know
that he can't take things for granted and think that he will be warned
again. When warned twice by the same bowler for the same mistake,
Kirsten should concentrate on taking the lead from the crease. After
getting caught the next time, and this time with penalty, Kirsten
ought to realize, and accept, his mistake; and not hide behind the
convenient garb of accusing Kapil of being unsportive.

|> [Opinions on Kapil's alleged willful running on the wicket deleted] 
|> 
|> 	--SAN

Just my opinions...

Cheers, Chandra.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: taravade@shark.ecn.purdue.edu (Kunal N Taravade)
Subject: Re: Wasnt there a 7th OD?
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: 19 Dec 92 13:35:41 GMT

000087384@cats.ucis.vill.edu (GUNNA, SANDEEP) writes:

>the subject says it all
>is the match not being played
>thanks

The match is being played. After 19 overs , being put in
to bat by India, SA are 71/1. Wessels going strong on 36.


-Kunal
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Pak after 15 overs
Date: 11 Dec 1992 23:25:17 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Pakistan are 1 for 1 for 67; Raja 19, Malik 1

Sohail was caught at deep backward square leg by Bishop off Simmons for 41 at
63. He faced 46 balls


WI dropped three catches by Lara (Raja) LOgie and Adams (Sohail)
At the end of 10 overs Pak are none for 49; Aamir 31, Raja 12

SEt to score 178 to win 42 overs
Pakistan are none for 21 after 5 overs
Rameez 8, Aamir 9
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: score Ind/SA
Date: 17 Dec 1992 12:57:51 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu



Plan file generated by 'Dougie', the cricket scorer.
For a realtime, full screen (insert more hype here) score update get the
dougie source from ford.ee.up.ac.za via anonymous ftp, the latest version is
pub/dougie-0.0.tar.Z      - Enjoy!

To connect to this host, use
dougie plains.NoDak.edu 1340

          South Africa vs India, 6th D/N, Kingsmead, Durban, 17/12/92
              South Africa                               India
Hudson     c Yadav b Kapil     15 ( 29)  Prabhakar  c Richard b Matthe  21 ( 48)

Wessels    c Manjrek b Jadeja  78 (120)  Jadeja     c Richard b Pringl  12 ( 45)

Kirsten    c Manjrek b Shastr  44 ( 68)  Manjrekar  run out Hudson      10 ( 24)

Rhodes     c Shastri b Kapil   16 ( 25)  Azhar    - not out             29 ( 56)

Callaghan  st Yadav b Kumble    8 ( 12)  Tendulkar* not out             12 ( 23)

Cronje     b Kapil             25 ( 29)  Shastri                                

Richardsn  run out Yadav       12 ( 11)  Kapil                                  

Pringle    run out Yadav        9 (  8)  Sharma                                 

Matthews   not out              1 (  1)  Yadav                                  

Donald                                   Kumble                                 

DVilliers                                Raju                                   

Extras  (W: 0 N: 2 B: 2 LB: 4)  8        Extras  (W: 0 N: 5 B: 0 LB: 6) 11
Total   (Ov: 50.0 RR: 4.32)   216 / 8    Total   (Ov: 32.0 RR: 2.97)    95 / 3 
             O  M  R  Wi Wd Nb                        O  M  R  Wi Wd Nb 
Callaghan    4  1  21  0  0  2           Prabhakar   10  1  54  1  0  2
Cronje    -  5  1  12  0  0  0           Shastri      6  0  36  1  0  0
Pringle      6  0  16  2  0  0           Kapil       10  4  23  3  0  0
Matthews  *  7  0  20  1  0  2           Sharma       4  0  18  0  0  0
Donald       5  0  20  0  0  1           Kumble      10  1  34  1  0  0
DVilliers    5  0  20  0  0  0           Raju        10  1  45  0  0  0
                          majerake runout on a no ball
on a no ball
edge
ding
oball
fun
 until 19:30...
s
ts then
d
ve munched
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: wasi@athena.mit.edu (Wasiuddin A. Wahid)
Subject: Re: Can we count the chickens yet 
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 02:33:46 GMT




Dear Saad,

As far as I remember, Pakistan did reach the finals of the WSC
cups in 1989(?) when Sri-Lanka was the third team. It is true that
Pakistan has never won it, but Pakistan has always entertainted us
with some scintillating matches.

-Wasi.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: murali@emily.polymer.uakron.edu (Murali Cotah)
Subject: lowest six 
Organization: Institute of Polymer Science, University of Akron
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 18:58:07 GMT

Keywords: 

>what in your
opinion is the lowest six you've ever seen?
Sudhama
>
Krishnamachari - world cup Finals - the best i have seen
cotah
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: rpsingh@uwovax.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: India should give up. Was: SA wins the 4th 
Organization: University of Western Ont, London
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 15:17:01 GMT

In article <Bz96pz.1CBE@austin.ibm.com>, jogi@austin.ibm.com (Vijay Joglekar) writes:
> 
> As I had said earlier India should give up playing cricket.  Should 
> call back Gavaskar and Srikanth....
> 
> Our batting has been pretty fu**ed up.

If they should give up playing cricket, why call back Gavaskar and Kris.
I can undersatand your disgust on their dismal batting performance which
incidentally is affecting your judgement too, it seems :--)
Take it easy,
Ravi. 

*******************************************************************************
`It's foolish to be wise in the company of fools.' 
                                                     
*******************************************************************************
Ravi P. Singh                    *    E-mail: rpsingh@hydra.uwo.ca
Dept. of Physics                 *    Phone : (519)-679-2111 Ext.6556 [off]
University of Western Ontario    *            (519)-433-6291 [Res.]
London N6A 3K7, Ontario          *    Fax   : (519)-661-2033 
 C A N A D A                     *
*



















*******************************************************************************
From: guptar@ucs.orst.edu (Rakesh Gupta)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Azhar's failure - High time....
Date: 15 Dec 92 01:26:21 GMT
Organization: University Computing Services - OSU
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucs.orst.edu

In article <92349.185303U60012@uicvm.uic.edu> <U60012@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:
>Hi Netters !
>
>      I feel that Azhar's failure both as a captain and also as a specialist ba
>tsman is to be considered seriously.  I also feel that it's high time that
>kapil takes responsibility and
>qquit
>qquit
>qquit
>
>

I AGREEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

aZHAR HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO MOTIVATE THE TEAM. HE HAS ALSO FAILED AS BATSMAN. I
THINK IT IS TIME FOR HIM TO THINK FOR RETIREMENT.


rakesh gupta
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: SCHEDULE - Reply to many requests
Date: 12 Dec 1992 02:29:59 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsd.csd.mu.edu

	Here's the itinerary for the Indian tour to South Africa.

Dates		India vs			Venue
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oct 29		Nicky Oppenheimer XI		Halfway House
Oct 31 - Nov 3	Combined Bowl 			Springs
Nov 6  - Nov 9	President's XI			Centurion Park
Nov 13 - Nov 17 SA - FIRST TEST			Durban
Nov 20 - Nov 23	SA Invitational XI		Bloemfontein
Nov 26 - Nov 30	SA _ SECOND TEST		Johannesburg
Dec 4		President's XI			Pietermaritzburg
Dec 7		SA - 1st ODI			Cape Town
Dec 9		SA - 2nd ODI			Port Elizabeth
Dec 11		SA - 3rd ODI			Centurion Park
Dec 12		SA - 4th ODI			Johannesburg
Dec 15		SA - 5th ODI			Bloemfontein
Dec 17		SA - 6th ODI			Durban
Dec 19		SA - 7th ODI			East London
Dec 21 - Dec 23 Combined Univs, Colleges...	East London
Dec 26 - Dec 30 SA - THIRD TEST			Port Elizabeth
Jan 2  - Jan 6	SA - FOURTH TEST		Cape Town
____________________________________________________________________________

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: tbaig@spot.wrc.xerox.com (taqi baig)
Subject: Testing...
Organization: Xerox
Distribution: Usa
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 22:06:24 GMT
From: vaghela@laxatv.reo.dec.com (Umesh Vaghela)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: India / SA  scorecard please
Date: 11 Dec 92 18:14:44 GMT
Reply-To: vaghela@laxatv.reo.dec.com (Umesh Vaghela)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


Could someone please post the latest scorecards of the 3rd ODI.
Thanks.

--
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                            Umesh Vaghela                                |
|                Digital Equipment Corporation - Reading, Berks, UK       |
|                                                                         |
| 	Userid : vaghela@marvin.enet.dec.com				  |
|          	 vaghela@laxatv.reo.dec.com                               |
|          	 vaghela@wikkit.enet.dec.com                              |
|									  |
|All views & opinions expressed here are entirely my own and NOT digital's|
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: shivanan@nyquist.usc.edu (Mr. Shivanan Bhajekar)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: India , Pakistan , Sri Lanka
Date: 18 Dec 1992 15:54:52 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: nyquist.usc.edu
Keywords: If there are no bugs then something is wrong with the program...

In article <1992Dec18.111314.28651@rdg.dec.com> vaghela@laxatv.reo.dec.com (Umesh Vaghela) writes:
>
>The reasons for the poor performance in the recent ODIs in SA and Australia
>is that the loosing teams (India and Pakistan) have been 1) over confident, ie.
>India thinking SA are new boys in International cricket

	Currently (which is since the last 1 year) India are in no 
	position to be confident about anything except losing!

	I am sure this is the view held by most of the people who are
	practical and not optimistic and patriotic.

	stuff deleted......
>
>
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Pak v Aus Pak after 25 overs
Date: 12 Dec 1992 19:58:20 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Pakistan are 3 for 68 at the end of 25 th over. Both Mustaba and Rameez are
out. Miandad and Inzamam are batting. Both the wickets fell to Tim May, but I
do not know how and the scores.

Pakistan are 1 for 59 at the end of 20 overs. Rameez 29, Mustaba 20
Sohail was run out earlier. Rameeaz has a runner starting from the next over,

Pakistan are 1 for 46 at the end of 15th over. Raja 19, Mustaba 17
Gamestart delayed and the match 47 overs/side

WSC   -6

Pak v Australia   Dec 13 at Adelaide

BBC has reported that the game just started (either it is an old report or the
start was delayed)
Australia won the toss and sent Pakistan in. Pakistan are 10 for 1 in the third
over. More details from 8:00pm EST. I hope either j.n.a or amir will use their
.plan file till the signal on 21740 fades out.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: babu@vu-vlsi.ee.vill.edu (Srinivasa Gopaladhine)
Subject: Final score board 7th ODI SA/IND
Organization: Villanova University
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 21:31:19 GMT

      South Africa vs India, 7th D/N, Buffalo Park, East London, 92-12-19
              South Africa                               India
Wessels    c Amre b Raju       57 ( 99)  Prabhakar  b Donald            12 ( 19)
Hudson     lbw Manjrekar        8 ( 14)  Manjrekar  lbw McMillan         6 ( 34)
Kirsten    c Bannerj b Raju    30 ( 63)  Tendulkar  c Richard b Matthe  21 ( 38)
Rhodes     c Kumble b Manjrek  38 ( 56)  Azhar      run out Callaghan   24 ( 41)
Callaghan  c Prabhak b Raju     0 (  2)  Amre     * not out             84 ( 98)
Cronje     c Tendulk b Yadav   55 ( 56)  Kapil      lbw Matthews        17 ( 33)
McMillan   not out              2 ( 10)  Yadav    - not out             32 ( 22)
Richardso  b Manjrekar          1 (  2)  Raju                                   
Matthews   run out Yadav        1 (  1)  Sharma                                 
Donald                                   Kumble                                
DVilliers                                Bannerjee                              
Extras  (W: 1 N: 2 B: 0 LB: 8) 11        Extras  (W: 2 N: 1 B: 0 LB: 5)  8
Total  (R:4.06  O:50.0)       203 / 8    Total  (R:4.34  O:47.0)       204 / 5 
                   Ov   M  R  Wi Wd Nb                      Ov   M  R  Wi Wd Nb 
Callaghan          5.0  0  21  0  1  0   Prabhakar         10.0  1  43  3  0  3
Cronje             4.0  0  27  0  0  0   Kapil             10.0  4  28  1  1  0
McMillan          10.0  1  38  1  0  0   Raju              10.0  0  37  3  0  0
Matthews        * 10.0  2  52  2  0  0   Sharma             8.0  0  35  0  0  0
Donald          - 10.0  0  56  1  1  1   Kumble             9.0  1  36  0  0  1
DVilliers          8.0  3  21  0  0  0   Bannerjee          3.0  0  20  0  0  0
                        !!!! INDIA WINS BY 5 WICKETS !!!