HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Seesters, I want the seesters.
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 14:53:55 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.134135.17532@gvl.unisys.com> liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious) writes:
>In article <1701@necis.UUCP>, dlyons@necis.UUCP (Dave Lyons) writes:
>|> In article <1992Aug28.144250.20787@gvl.unisys.com>, liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious) wrote:
>|> > 
>|> > No Larry, I think I have the perfect sisters for him.  They're Irish, they're
>|> > both tatooed and they go for the Harley type.  Of course the younger one has
>|> . . .
>|> > some redeeming qualifications.  She's been tossed out of bars for smashing 
>|> > people on the face with beer mugs.  Charming, don't ya think!
>|> 
>|> James, perhaps you can tell me as you've been around here longer than
>|> I.  Why do guys who ride bikes (like us) ALWAYS seem to attract
>|> comments like this ????
>|>                                          -- Dave --
>
>Don't worrry Dave, it's not really the bikes; you have to consider the
>overall Sensitive New Age Guy image which James projects.  But I gather
>you don't want to meet my sisters either?? :-)
>
>Liz Loquacious
 
Liz I find it attrocious, the demeaning manner in which you have
assaulted the sensibility's of my young motorbiking companion.
Have you ever Lambada'd?

 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle)
Subject: Re: Boston Baby Boink!
Keywords: Paaahty, Baaahston, Wicked Pissah!
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 23:22:09 GMT


>>thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
>>>Soc.Singles!  It's a new toy every day!  Didn't you read your warranty
>>>card before you sent it in?

>rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon) writes:
>>Mine didn't come with a warranty card, just a piece of paper that said, "I
>>hope you know what you're in for..."

Guess you get what you pay for, eh?

Mine came with a little slip of paper, I never read it--oh, here 'tis: 
"Inspected by No. 42"

-- 
"Pedigree, n.  The known part of the route from an arborial ancestor
 with a swim bladder to an urban ancestor with a cigarette."
 ............................Ambrose Beirce, _The Devil's Dictionary_
-- 
Kiran Wagle     <kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>     (812) 335-0420
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: is: brudders how bout some brudders was: Seesters, I want the seesters.
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 13:03:26 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.210333.8566@gvl.unisys.com> liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious) writes:
>In article pw@panix.com (Paul Wallich) writes:
>|> In article jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>|> > What say the park? High noon? I'll bring the chandelier. You bring the
>|> >rope?
>|> 
>|> I'll have you know that according to the Supreme Court the appropriate
>|> location for high noon is Times Square, but only if you are at the same
>|> time engaging in a valid political dialog.
>|> 
>
>Well, this might have qualified Paul; it sounded like he was gearing up
>for the War of the Roses to me, though probably not just dialog!  Alas,
>the whole things off, poor poor me...:-(
>
>Liz Loquacious - whatever will I do now
 
 I have a brudder. He's a couple years older and shall we say, conservative.
He owns a pet shop. A big pet shop. He's married but I hear it's (secret)
rocky.

 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Oh, no! Statistics! Run!! :-)
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 04:50:41 GMT

In article <1992Aug24.191730.2958@cs.ucla.edu> gds@cs.ucla.edu (Greg Skinner) writes:
>In article <1992Aug24.185819.11844@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>>  Going to and from the car that night, three people I'd
>>never seen before simply started talking pleasantly to me ("hi!  How're
>>ya doing?  Etc.").  And so, I thought to myself, that it must be that
>>you just happen to live in a less friendly part of the universe and 
>>ought to move to Denver.
>
>Is Denver friendly to everybody?  Does every person get spoken to by
>passers by on the street?

Though I haven't done a formal study, I don't see why not--in fact, 
before it came up on soc.singles, I'd assumed that this was typical
behavior everywhere. 

>>Incidentally, I've never noticed that having a Porsche is particulary
>>effective in helping one get a relationship, but it is a nice 
>>practical car that gets good gas milage and prevents me from getting
>>speeding tickets.
>
>I thought the cops were more likely to ticket you if you were speeding
>in a fast car.  Of course, I guess it helps if your car can outrun the
>cops.

All else being equal, it might seem more likely to attract the attention
of the local constabulary, but the first thing I noticed about driving a
Porsche is that people pass me a lot more often; I don't drive any 
differently than I used to (and when I drive someone else's car, I no
longer get passed nearly as often), but it seems to be a much bigger
ego boost to pass a Porsche driving at 58mph than a Volvo going the
same speed.  So, if there's anyone nearby in the mood to dispense
tickets, I figure he or she will go for the cars passing me at 75mph.

 
in <1992Aug25.212033.6006@cs.ucla.edu>
    gds@oahu.cs.ucla.edu (Greg Skinner) writes:
 
] For example, you might be riding the bus and be sitting right next to
] someone who'd be a compatible mate, but you might never connect,
] unless you live in Trygve's universe. :-)

A good universe it is too--the last time I rode a bus was years ago, but
I recall that the woman sitting on the other side of the aisle started
up a conversation with me which was a good thing, since after we'd talked
for a while, I realized that she was from out of town and had managed to
get north and south reversed and we were speeding away from her destination.

Trygve
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Can we can the suck-up bit?
Date: 1 Sep 92 20:46:49 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Sep1.202700.15221@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
|In article <1992Sep1.193125.4264@gvl.unisys.com> liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious) writes:
|>In article dbj@cs.washington.edu (Dave Johnson) writes:
|>|> 
|>|> Aha!  No wonder the excrutiatingly sensitive James got LJBF'd!
|>|> Liz found a lawn-mowing SLUT!
|>
|>And I even get to see the sweat bead up on his bare tanned chest as I
|>watch him from my bedroom window, going back and forth, not missing a single 
|>blade....I forgot all about James....

See what I mean.  Mr. Cxxxxxx is mowing Liz's lawn out of the kindness of his
his heart.  He has the lawnmower out and with a few more strokes he can
mow Liz's lawn as well.  Liz can, through the kindness in her heart, bring
over some extra cookies she has baked, or give him a blow job, or whatever.

Actually, on the surface it looks like Mr. Cxxxxxx is mowing Liz's lawn solely
out of the kindness of his heart.  In reality, he chooses a hot day to mow
his lawn so that he can remove his shirt.  In preparation for the task he has
secretly mounted a video camera in a tree and it is trained on Liz's bedroom
window.  Later, in the privacy of his own living room, he can watch the tape
and see Liz's getting worked up over the beads of sweat on his bare tanned
chest.  Lawn Sluts,  they gots no morals.  

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: motani@watson.ibm.com (Muiz Motani)
Subject: Re: Homesickness!
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 20:02:47 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.037 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: motani@vnet.ibm.com (Muiz Motani)
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In  <14348@auspex-gw.auspex.com>  johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
> In article <1992Aug27.225109.27562@watson.ibm.com> motani@vnet.ibm.com (Muiz Motani) writes:
> >In  <thurlow.714947137@convex.convex.com>  thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
> >> Anybody got a real good homesickness remedy?
> >
> >Yes......just bake yourself a batch of Nanaimo Bars and enjoy!
> 
> Are these from the town of Nanaimo (east coast of Vancouver Island)?  I was
> there once.  Did I miss something by not getting a Nanaimo bar?  Actually
> I did hit one Nanaimo bar.

Actually, I don't know why they are called Nanaimo Bars. These goodies are 
typically West-Coast-Canadian, though. I seem to remember some anecdote about a 
wife of a former Lieutenant Governor of B.C. coming up with the recipie.

________________________________________________________________________________
Muiz Motani
IBM Canada Lab                  motani@vnet.ibm.com
Distributed System Products
From: aaron@minster.york.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Cooking for 1!
Date: 3 Sep 92 09:07:58 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of York, England
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

: Why don't I ever find people who love to cook?  I don't really mind cooking
: per se, but after 8-10 hours at work, I certainly don't want to spend an
: hour cooking.  I'd rather sit here and read soc.singles :-)
: 

   The answer is to find a few other people and take it turns to cook,
   after all it doesn't take much more effort to cook for four than one
   and it seems much more worthwhile.

: Besides, I never seem to have the correct ingredients to make anything
: inteestments you could hope to make.

	Aaron Turner		aaron@minster.york.ac.uk
From: aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Oh, no! Statistics! Run!! :-)
Date: 26 Aug 92 02:25:00 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <1992Aug25.192721.39783@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.ibm.com writes:
>In  <1992Aug25.004519.16716@nuchat.sccsi.com>  kevin@nuchat.sccsi.com (Kevin Brown) writes:
>>> It's not the car. It's not the driver. It's the tools.
>> Hmm...wonder if women go for guys with Sears Craftsman tools.  :-)
> No, women like men with Snap-On tools.  :-)

The floor polisher works well enough for me.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

So much Astroglide.  So little time.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Finding Romantic Partners (long)
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 92 19:04:19 GMT

In article <1992Aug22.001528.10517@fid.morgan.com> sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
>In article <X26uPB1w162w@micor.ocunix.on.ca>
>graydon@micor.ocunix.on.ca (Graydon) writes:
>
>>I've had someone come up to me, smear chocolate sauce on my neck,
>>and proceed to lick it off.
>>
>>It *can* happen, really it can.  Please don't ask me *why* it
>>happens;
>
>I don't care *why* it happens.  I just want to know *how* to make it
>(more likely to) happen.

I've found it helps a lot not to be wearing a turtleneck.
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Where the best posts come from
Date: 31 Aug 92 19:10:18 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <la4pdaINNl25@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>In article <-xhn_lp.barry@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
|>Sheba's the best poster in the newsgroup (though she doesn't post
|>enough).
|
|Isn't anybody going to mention any men?  How about the sensitive james
|dutton?  

Could it be?  James, I think she still cares.

|Or Steve Swann?  Or James Nicole?  Or.... whoops, I guess it's 
|a waste of time to suck up to the men, huh?

Don't worry, I`ve got plenty of time.  Do you have the place?

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle)
Subject: Re: Open season on straight lines (was Bananas)
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 08:47:51 GMT

Paul Wallich & Marianna Max) engage in witty repartee:

>>>>Boy have you got me pegged wrong.

>>>So, Max, how should I have you pegged? A little to the left, perhaps?
>>>You're gonna have to help if you want the job done right.

>>Problem is Paul, you're just not the man for the job.

If at first you don't succeed, try a little lower.
-- 
Kiran Wagle     <kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>     (812) 335-0420
From: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Boston Baby Boink!
Date: 30 Aug 92 20:56:18 GMT
Reply-To: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Dept., Madison, WI

In <1992Aug30.000129.1@sscl.uwo.ca> carl@sscl.uwo.ca (Carl Kaufmann) writes:
>In article <3770@cvbnetPrime.COM>, bmeyer@feds12.prime.com (Robert A Meyer x2557 14-13) writes:
>>     The Boston Baby Boink  
>>     the weekend of Sept 12-13 1992
>>     In Boston ... Massachussetts!

>AAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!

>I'll be in the area the weekend *before* this. :-(
>To visit someone I met on the Net. :-)

>Any chance of arranging a special sneak preview?
>Please, please, pretty please.

Don't worry about it.  I was in the area in the middle of August (vacationing
on Cape Cod), and have a long an honored history of being somewhere else in
the country PRECISELY when EVERY net.party I've ever wanted to attend has
been held.

I think it's a conspiracy.

-- 
Michael Rawdon	    rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu  [Note new address!]
University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department, Madison, WI

"A distributed system is one in which the failure of a computer you didn't
 even know existed can render your own computer unusable."
			- Leslie Lamport, as quoted in CACM, June 1992
From: dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Lurkers...
Date: 26 Aug 92 21:11:05 GMT
Reply-To: dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

dheisler@CERIS.Purdue.EDU (Dave Heisler) writes:
>From article <1992Aug26.192500.21837@cs.hw.ac.uk>, by neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite):
>> 
>      i'll agree this is one reason. and I'll give you
>      another,
>
>      you email someone who posts and they never reply.
>      (yes, assuming it it got there) 
>
>      CLIQUE, BANG!, GOTHCHA

Well, in my case, I try my best but sometimes I get 10 or more messages
a day.  Remember, I mostly answer on my lunch hour and I don't always
get a chance to take lunch hours.  I try to at least say 'hi', but when I'm
more than 30 deep I don't always get to even the ones I really want to
talk to.  And when I go home I need to spend the time with the baby.
(assuming that your note not only got there, but that it was polite and
relatively non-looney.)

I'm not saying this to you personally Dave (I don't think you've ever 
written me) but I'm a lot less friendly in e-mail than I used to be.  I've
gotten to many looney letters in the past, and some of them have been
very unfriendly.  Yeah, I know, I always took the hate mail as being part
of a big joke and sometimes even went looking for it.  But it just occured
to me one day that the next guy who shows up on my doorstep might not be
as friendly and reasonable as my visitors so far have been.  Some of the
women who post here have some real horror stories to tell.  

So it may not be cliquiness or unfriendliness, but a lack of time or a
touch of paranoia, justifiable or not.  There's a couple of regulars here
who never answer my letters either.

Dawn
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious)
Subject: Re: is: brudders how bout some brudders was: Seesters, I want the seesters.
Followup-To: soc.singles
Organization: Paramax Systems
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 16:04:57 GMT

In article <1992Sep2.130326.10011@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
|>  
|>  I have a brudder. He's a couple years older and shall we say, conservative.
|> He owns a pet shop. A big pet shop. He's married but I hear it's (secret)
|> rocky.
|> 

Uh, no thanks.  But thanks for thinking of me James, you're too kind.

Liz Loquacious
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: rock@medch.b17b.ingr.com (Chris Hudson)
Subject: Re: The Dawn of Suckups (Was: Re: Bananas)
Reply-To: rock@medch.b17a.ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 21:59:27 GMT

In article <la4bopINNgh3@news.bbn.com>, dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
|> In article <1992Aug29.125914.18314@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
|> >
|> >The best way to do a suckup big time is to ask around, find out the person's
|> >real address or work address and then send them a bouquet or some other
|> >suprise.
|> 
|> Not unless the person knows you by at least e-mail first.  I'd get seriously
|> weirded out to think that some unknown person had my home address.  
|> 
|> Dawn
|> 

I have to agree here.  Just receiving flowers out of the blue from an unknown
person could be terrifying to some people.  Especially if they were received 
at their home.  With the problem of "stalkers" nowdays, having a secret admirer
could be deadly.  If you're interested in sucking up, reply to the suckee of
choice by e-mail and start sucking fast and furious.

Chris Hudson
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams)
Subject: Re: Finding Romantic Partners (long)
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 10:18:42 GMT

In <1992Aug26.223614.25162@linus.mitre.org> wtr@mitre.org (Bill Ralston) writes:

>in article <ewillims.714843551@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma 
>Williams) writes:

>[previous thread history deleted]

>>        Weird as it sounds, chocolate sauce on meat is an original use
>>for chocolate. The Aztecs used to use it as a sauce and regarded it as
>>delicacy. That's what I call chocoholism.....my kind of people! (*GRIN*)

>It's called Mole sauce and it is *good*.  There's a southern mexican style 
>restaurant here (Boston) that serves dishes with that and other 
>Aztec-style dishes that is really good (perhaps an excuse in itself for a 
>Boston-Boink).  In addition, the Mole sauce has seemed to have an 
>aphrodisiac effect on the ladies I've taken there. Heh heh heh...


	That's because chocolate apparently releases the same chemical's
into a woman's body that are released when she is falling in love! That's
why more women than men are chocoholics and it is such comfort food.
	(That is why it is sooooooo goooood when you combine love AND
chocolate!  Double ecstacy :)
From: dy@depsych.Gwinnett.COM (Dr. Yes)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Intelligence vs Smart Alec (Was: Various ramblings...)
Date: 4 Sep 92 11:01:02 GMT

diana@wetware.com (CatWoman ) writes:

> I think I have found an example of the difference.
> 
> The original comment was:
> 
> "Since it seems we're going to have an early Fall,
> maybe there will be some draught relief this year".
> 
> Possible response #1:
> 
> "No, not really. Typically an early wet season leads
> to a short season and then a dry winter".
> 
> (this said in a tone of voice of "I know what I'm
> talking about, and I'm never wrong" )

[comparison material deleted]

> To use your intelligence without appearing overbearing
> or being a "smart aleck", is to give the OTHER person 
> some consideration in a converation.  Even if they say
> "It's Raining", when there is no rain in sight, instead
> of contradicting them, you can ask where the raindrops
> are.  And again, tone of voice is important - a condescending
> tone or sarcastic tone won't help - sound interested.
> 
> (rambling thoughts sure to inspire a LOT of contradiction...)
> 
> Diana

Since the weather is inherently a non-controversial subject a
person acting the smart-aleck know-it-all about it seems silly.
How about a genuine opinion expressed about a controversial
subject, even if it meets you criterion of considerations?
Consider something like:

"I know you're a longtime Woody Allen fan and I grant you he can
be really funny, but it seems to me that some degree of ambiguity
-- hostility really -- has always been inherent in the treatment
of conventional 'family values,' whatever _those_ are, in his
films, dating back as far a _Pussycat_."

Now there's a statement that opens up multiple cans of worms, from
echoes of censorship and McCarthyism to considerations of PC
machismo vs. PC feminism, with overtones of possibly latent
anti-Semitism and the interference of critical aesthetic and
cultural evaluations.  I think the semantic territory it seems to
open up is such a mine field that the easiest thing to do is
somehow reject the speaker as "pretentious," and a showoff, even
if the comment is made very tentatively.

--
Still Using Waffle 1.64!    | Wafffle, QEdit and Webster's
                            | NewWorld -- one great menage a
                            | trois!
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: dbj@cs.washington.edu (Dave Johnson)
Subject: Re: Where the best posts come from: Dawn naturally.
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 20:51:44 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.184813.17459@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <la4pdaINNl25@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>>Isn't anybody going to mention any men?  How about the sensitive james
>>dutton?  Or Steve Swann?  Or James Nicole?  Or.... whoops, I guess it's 
>>a waste of time to suck up to the men, huh?
>>
>>Dawn
> 
>I could see your impish mind working, on this one. You pixie you.
>You'll always be first in my heart, also.
>Whats my score?

James, James, you're slipping a little again.  Remember,
us sensitive guys don't worry about scoring.
-- 
  Dave Johnson

"You're not too smart, are you?  I like that in a man."
    --Kathleen Turner in Body Heat
From: dth@reef.cis.ufl.edu (David Hightower)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Lurkers...
Date: 1 Sep 92 14:52:25 GMT
Organization: Univ. of Florida CIS Dept.

Let's see....I've been reading this newsgroup since 1989, and I've
posted twice (three times, counting this one).  Hmmm....Yup, I'm a
"Lurker", I guess.

Why do I lurk?  Good question.  A large part of it is that any opinions
I have have already been aired; all I could do is say "ditto!".  

I suppose I only post when I feel really strongly about something, or
(as has been the case in the last 2 postings) when I've sought advice or
opinions.  On that point let me be clear:  this news group, in concert
with alt.romance, has been invaluable in helping me through some
difficult times.  I feel kinda guilty about not being able to give
anything back.

Maybe we should have a "coming out" party for lurkers?

Anyhow, I'll still be lurking, rest assured, and posting from time
to time.  Stranger things have happened.  ;>

_________________________________________________________________________
Dave Hightower		|    opinion? I'm allowed to have an opinion?
dth@cis.ufl.edu		| well, if I DID have one, it'd be mine, all mine!
hightowr@cadre.af.mil   |              "Omnia Vincit Amour"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: soc.singles