HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: brad@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Brad Barton)
Subject: Re: The Final Star Trek Movie?
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 19:04:58 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <C0Jqzx.161@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> rusbasan@expert.cc.purdue.edu (Bob Rusbasan) writes:
>In article <3ZTXwB1w165w@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca> denisf@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Denis Fafard) writes:
>>  Yup, it's been bouncing around.  Last Sept when the Creations Star 
>> Trek convention came to town, Marina Sirtis, among others, said that
>> ST VII was a definite go. No actors were announced, although it was
>> said that this would be the final one, a crossover movie from TOS to
>> TNG.  
>
>The final one, huh?  That can call it
>*** Star Trek VII: The Final Chapter -- Part III ***
>since part V and VI were also said to be the final movies.
>
>I loved most of the Star Trek movies, but they should end.  I'm
>glad they didn't end it with part V, for obvious reasons.  Part VI
>was pretty good.  They neatly tied things up, and the nostalgia was
>poured on pretty thickly.  It was enjoyable, and a good end to the
>series.  They should leave it alone.
>
>I'm hoping these new rumors are just delayed reportings of some old
>ones.  Star Trek VII *was* set to go, but due to personnel changes
>at Paramount it was no longer set to go.  The new person in charge
>would have to decide whether or not to do it.  I'm hoping that they
>have NOT decided to do it.
>
>I saw part VI as soon as it came out.  If they come out any more, *if*
>I ever see them I will wait until they are on video and they are not
>in the new releases section.  New release rentals generate more money
>for the movie companies, and even if I decide to see it out of curiousity
>I do not want to encourage a part VIII.

I'd like to see a 7 and 8 to tie us over 'til TNG movies.  But before you
start flaming or agreeing, I don't think I'd want to see Spock/Kirk/McCoy
in it as main characters.  Maybe set it 15-20 years ahead and give a promotion
to Captain Sulu to command the Starfleet flagship, the newly commissioned
NCC-1701B.  This way, Paramount could canonize events between TNG and TOS
and TMS (The Movie Series?).  Could be just wishful thinkin'.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Brad Barton - brad@cmptrc.lonestar.org  |  "Light the lamp, not the rat!"  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.current:23252 talk.bizarre:44336
From: durway@mpd.tandem.com (Lindsey Durway)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,talk.bizarre
Subject: Difference of races (was: Re: Gorgeous Women and Lots of Sex!!!!!)
Date: 11 Jan 93 21:51:44 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: Tandem Computers, Inc.

In article <1ir8qiINNduc@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>, pitsch@cps.msu.edu (Kimberly D Pitsch) writes:
>
> [...]
>
>Races: Does anyone remember the OS episode in which the crew encountered the
>
> [...]
>
>Any anthropologist worth his or her beans will tell you that there is no real
>difference between races. [...]

Not so.  In addition to skin color (& hair texture/color, eye color):

epicanthic folds around eyes
nose structure
muscle/bone density
length of some tendons
musculature around hips
vascular adaptation
inherited viral defenses

I don't do morphology/anthropology, so some of what I say may be baloney.
My point is that there are more differences than mere skin color.

And flesh tastes different too.  Lithuanians have a sweet taste that goes
well with Alsation white wines, while Zulus have a somewhat gamier
taste better complemented by a Spanish Rioja.  And who can complain
of a fine Australian Aborigine, sauteed in herb butter and served with
an Adelaide Sauterne?  Indeed, what better way to end a long day
meting out life and death at the U.N. than with a slow-cooked Guarani
from the shores of the Amazon (not unlike the brisket of an Oklahoman),
mesquite-smoked and accompanied by copious quantities of 1986 Haut-Medoc?

But I digress.

xxx
Lindsey

-- 
Lindsey Durway, a guy.  durway@mpd.tandem.com
This image consists entirely of recycled half-spin gauge bosons.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder)
Subject: Re: DS9 GARTH BROOKS WROTE THE MUSIC! HA!
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 18:26:41 GMT

In article <1993Jan11.144533.13474@bsu-ucs> 00jlrushton@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>DS9 MUSIC BLOWS!
>
>IVE GOT FRIENDS IN DEEP SPACES!..... GARTH BROOKS NEW MUSIC!
>
>LETS FACE IT THE MUSIC BLOWED SO DID THE LIGHTING!
>
>argh!
>
>Stimpi, leader of Deep SPOT Nine!



Have you considered eliminating sugar from your diet, friend?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Schroeder  		|  If this .sig causes dizziness or  
schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov         |  vertigo, dicontinue use and consult    
Brookhaven National Laboratory  |  your physician. 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: wombat@eng.umd.edu (Jose Gonzalez)
Subject: Re: *** Spoiler *** Comments on "Chain of Command Part II"
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 93 17:25:16 GMT
Organization: Project GLUE, University of Maryland, College Park
Originator: wombat@coke.eng.umd.edu

In article <17808@umd5.umd.edu> jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...) writes:
>In article <1992Dec27.034809.3466@eng.umd.edu> wombat@eng.umd.edu (Jose Gonzalez) writes:
>>*** Spoilers ***

>
>
>>In article <athos-261292111931@kip2-29.apple.com> athos@apple.com (Rick Eames) writes:
>>>In article <1992Dec26.160341.22400@eng.umd.edu>, wombat@eng.umd.edu (Jose
>>>Gonzalez) wrote:
>>people who are control-freaks often break under the pressure of all the 
>>responsbility.  As I said previously, I would *love* to see Jellico back
>if Stewart leaves the show.  It would be very interesting to see how he handles
>>failure.
>
>Breaking under the pressure.  I think you just put your finger on what linked 
>the two main plots of Chain of Command -- the parallel between Jellico and
>Gul Madred.  They're both authority figures bent on control and manipulation--
>and while one is a little more genteel than the other, they both show their
>weaknesses almost to the breaking point.

Yes.  That gives Troi's comment about Jellico not being sure of himself
even more meaning, since it applies also to Gul Madred.  It may be a little
harsh to say that Madred is someone that Jellico could have been if 
circumstances had been different, but Madred *definately* could have been
the type of Captain that Jellico is.  

>There's another nice parallel between the two, come to think of it.  Isn't the
>mining of the Cardassian fleet -- planting hidden devices in their midst to
>destroy them -- kind of like the implant Madred put in Picard?  Only for
>Jellico, it works...

Ah, but it worked for Madred as well.  He *broke* Picard mind at the end,
even if he didn't break his spirit.  The scary thing is, it's *these* types
of people, the ruthless manipulators, who are the most successful at the
top, as leaders.   

-- 
Jose Gonzalez
From: scott.hollifield@the-matrix.com (Scott Hollifield) 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: 39 Re: Uniform Colors
Date: 7 Jan 93 06:25:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The MATRIX BBS - Birmingham, AL - 205-323-2016
Reply-To: scott.hollifield@the-matrix.com (Scott Hollifield) 

On Wed, 6 Jan 1993 14:30:07 GMT, rbeck@mordordseg.ti.com (Ron Beck) wrote:

RB>How about Red=Command, Gold=Engineering/Security, and Blue=Sciences.

How about Red= Command AND navigation?  (Sorry, that's one of my trivia
nits.  :>)

RB>Ship's crew = Colored tunics w/ black sholders.  Base crew = Black
RB>tunics w/ colored sholders.  Note the uniform changes on Sisko &
RB>O'Brien when on-board ship & on-board base.

I might point out that the DS9 uniforms may not be meant for the personnel
of every starbase.  We've seen starbase personnel before ("11001001") who
wore normal uniforms.

              /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
              \  "Let us think the unthinkable, let us   /   scott.hollifield
              /   do the undoable.  Let us prepare to    \   @the-matrix.com
              \  grapple with the ineffable itself, and  /
              /    see if we may not eff it after all."  \
              \_              --- Dirk Gently           _/
                \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

---
 . OLX 2.1 TD . Don't let me know, whatever you've got. . Beverly
From: kuchar@buast7.bu.edu (Tom Kuchar)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: DS9 Theme reminds me of...
Date: 12 Jan 93 16:25:42 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA


I wished they used the main title from STVI for DS9. I think it would
lend to the air of grittiness they seem to want for the show.

-- 
Tom Kuchar			  
kuchar@buast7.bu.edu		  -or-                      kuchar@plh.af.mil
Department of Astronomy                              Phillips Laboratory/GPOB
Boston Univerity		                                  Hanscom AFB
From: ancst8+@pitt.edu (Anuj Chandra)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: RE:PITTSBURGH SCHEDULE OF DS9
Date: 12 Jan 93 22:42:54 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
Originator: ancst8@unixd3.cis.pitt.edu

Hi:
Pittsburgh area can watch DS9 on Saturdays starting 1/16 at 
7.00pm on FOX
Anuj

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: S104374@UMRVMA.umr.edu
Subject: Chief O'Brien
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 20:28:09 GMT
Organization: Univ of MO - Rolla

Another point for enlisted personel on the Enterprise...

Chief O'Brien...Doesn't this indicate rank (Chief Petty Officer)
or is he just chief transporter officer?

Also:  What happened to the "casual", short uniforms of the first season?


                                              -=Road Warrior=-

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: YANJUNA@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu
Subject: Re: Emmy for Patrick Stewart
Organization: Yale University
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 93 19:14:40 EST

In article <1993Jan4.200955.18434@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
jlc5f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jean L. Cooper) writes:
 
>
>Actually, I've noticed over the years that it is
>difficult for science fiction anything to be recognized
>as quality.  SF books never win the National Book
>Award, and mainstream authors who use the SF
>genre (Margaret Atwood, "A Handmaid's Tale" for example)
>vociferously deny that they have written SF--but, of
>course, she did accept the Hugo when it was awarded
>to her.
>
    (No guarentee on accuracy), but I think there was a category
for SF in National Book Awards for one particular year; (I believe
Fredrik Pohl won it for _Man Plus_ or _Jem_) and then they cancelled
it after that year stating SF has enough awards on its own.
 
>SF movies have the same problem--when "Raiders of the
>Lost Ark" was nominated for the Oscar, it was beaten
>out by "Gandhi".  (At the time, TIME magazine reported
>that "Gandhi" won by being what all the Hollywood
>stars wanted to be but couldn't--thin, tan, and moral.)
>Siskal and Ebert NEVER give an SF movie a good review.
 
    (No guarentee of accuracy on this one either), but one of them (Siskel
or Ebert, I can never tell which one is which) used to write for a SF
fanzine.  I think Harlan Ellison mentionned it in one of his movie reviews
in F&SF.
 
>
>I think this resistance to SF permeates our culture, and
>is not just in television.
 
   (This one, at least, is accurate.)  If some authors do not want to be
classified as SF writer, that's OK with me; it's their right.  However,
what really bugs me is when critics and academics call SF writers
non-SF; there was an article in the New York Times Book Review which
took the position that Dick was not *really* a SF writer. The position of the
critic who wrote that article was basically that, Dick was *too good* to be
a SF writer, and since the critic liked Dick's work, it couldn't be SF;
basically ignoring the fact that
Dick himself swore up and down before his death that he *was* a SF writer,
and damned proud of it.  (A local used literary bookseller here had the
same idea... Anything good [or more accurately, anything that he liked]
can't be SF because it's too good.)
   Other writers who appearantly had the same trouble include Ursula LeGuin
and James Tiptree Jr., who often state ( or in case of Tiptree, stated) that
they wrote SF no matter what the critics said.
 
    Personally, I think we need more writers writing good stories than
critics making dubious or idiotic criticisms.
 
   Junsok Yang
 
 
 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: morgan@nolichucky.rtp.dg.com (Keith Morgan)
Subject: Re: DS9: "The Emissary" (SPOILERS) 
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 14:29:02 GMT
Organization: Data General Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC
Followup-To: /dev/null

In article <1993Jan4.142029.28026@uvm.edu>, cblaise@moose.uvm.edu (Chris Blaise) writes:
|> 
|> 	Agreed.  Even though I watched it 4 times, I still think Sisko's
|> sequence with the aliens was too long.  (anyone else think that his
|> explanation at the baseball field was very renminisicient of Kirk?  ;)

I thought I was watching "TOS, Recapturing our Heritage".  O'Brien's
Irish brogue sounded more and more like a Scottish burr as he delivered
one Scotty-esque line after another.  The plot & "space-western" pace was
certainly a lot more reminiscent of TOS than STNG.  All that's needed to
make the aping complete is for Odo to grow long ears & wax philosophical.

-- 
Keith Morgan                     
Data General                  ------------------------
Research Triangle Park, NC    credo quia absurdium est
(919)248-6078                 ------------------------
morgan@dg-rtp.dg.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: DS9: Acting
From: CHD@HERMES.ECE.ARIZONA.EDU (Chris De Young)
Date: 4 Jan 93 23:27:38 MST
Distribution: world,local
Organization: --
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

In <C0D8ow.CIE@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> dbasinge@silver.ucs.indiana.edu writes:

> Terry Farrell (Dax): Came off kinda air-headish too me. Would like to
> see her in a Troi outfit though.

Perhaps slightly, though it wasn't enough to bother me; I think the character
has a lot of potential.  I'd like to see the Trill explored in more detail; 
what is the relationship between the 'body' and the 'slug' (that's a technical
term)?  How much of the final personality comes from each?  I would say they
are both self aware; you could see that from Dax's memory of the transfer.
Perhaps this Dax will not be quite the same person that Sisko knew in the past.
Perhaps she (for lack of a better pronoun) might try to be.... who knows.
Potential for good stories though.

> Armin Shimerman (Quark): I like his character, the first Ferengi that
> didn't bother me.

I think he could have been a little more annoying, as Ferengi should be...
it's a fine line though.

> Siddig El Fadil (Doc Bashir):  Real, real annoying, IMHO. Wesley of
> the month club.

Again, I think there's potential for some good stories here as he learns that
life maybe isn't so glamorous as he might have thought.  It's an old storyline;
hopefully they can do it in a refreshing way.

-Chris
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: harp@netcom.com (Gregory O. Harp)
Subject: Re: Dax in previous lives?
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 15:25:23 GMT

roy@watson.ibm.com writes:

>No, I think the actress you are talking about is Annette O'Toole.
>She (AT) can be seen in 48 Hours as Nick Nolte's girlfriend.
>Her hair color is red, and natural I think, though I have no proof.

Whose natural hair color is red?  Annete O'Toole or Terry Farrel?

If I remember correctly from Hellraiser III (Hey, I saw it for free.
I wouldn't have paid for it, and Ms. Farrel was the only reason we
didn't walk out.) her hair _was_ reddish.  It was the sort of red that
dyed redheads don't have (i.e. it was slightly blondish, slightly
brownish, and mostly red).

Take it from me.  I've dated two natural redheads and a dyed one. ;)
-- 
-----------------Greg-Harp----------------harp@netcom.com------------------
  "I think I've reached that point / Where every word that you write /
  Of every blood dark sea / And every soul black night / And every dream
  you dream me in / And every perfect free from sin / And burning eyes /
  And hearts on fire / Are just the same old song" -- The Cure
From: kan9691@bcstec.ca.boeing.com (Ken Niedermeyer)
Subject: Re: G-class ships at 359
Organization: Boeing Computer Services
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 20:36:03 GMT

On Sun, 10 Jan 1993 21:29:35 GMT Jeff Verhoef(jverho80@ursa.calvin.edu) wrote:
: I don't think it was a Galaxy-class; rather it had the lines of an
: Ambassador-class ship (same class as the Enterprise-C).  The secondary
: hull was rounder and the struts that hold the warp nacelles were sharper
: and longer.

: --jsv--
: --
: Jeff Verhoef        Calvin College  |  "Phasers are the universal              
: jverho80@Calvin.edu                 |   communicators."
: Grand Rapids, MI USA 49546          |      ---Lt. Worf, *Vendetta*

In the novel Vendetta it mentions that a G-class starship WAS at Wolf 359.
Please no flames about the difference between the novels and the series.

-- 

---
Ken Niedermeyer			| The views expressed above do not represent
Computing Systems Analyst	| those of my employer.... (but when do they?)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: bigdog!jon (Jon Wright)
Subject: CoCII... where was I?
Organization: Banzai Research Institute
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 01:44:42 GMT

> >Those who really enjoyed the Warner/Stewart confrontation
> >aspect of [the Star Trek Episode "Chain of Command," part II]
> >might also enjoy the movie _Closet Land_
> >with Alan Rickman and Madeline Stowe--just the two of them
> >locked for two hours in a similar, but more intensely
> >horrifying, test of wills and physical endurance.
> 
> I agree... but turn off the tape before the last five minutes.  The end
> really falls flat on its face.
> 

Gee, I must've missed something.  Has Chain of Command aired yet in San Diego  
(or Los Angeles)?  If so, does anyone have the schedule of the rerunning?  I'd  
appreciate it cuz I scan the TV guides religiously, or so I thought.  Any  
correspondence via E-mail or posting would be appreciated.  Sorry to be a  
dunce.
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Paramount Press Release - TNG - #238: Ship In A Bottle
Date: 11 Jan 93 03:04:15 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout

In article <1993Jan10.190533.5304@news.acns.nwu.edu> mark-brodsky@nwu.edu writes:
<In article <4735@vidiot.UUCP> brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes:
<> 
<> 
<> Ship In A Bottle
<> _P_R_O_G_R_A_M_ _H_I_G_H_L_I_G_H_T_S
<> 
<> 	STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION: "Ship in a Bottle" -- A calculating
<> 	Sherlock Holmesian character traps Picard and others in a holodeck
<> 	simulation.
<>
<Araggggg, another Holodeck show. Why don't they just seal the damm thing up,  
<it's caused far more problems then the Romulan's or the Borg. I for one am  
<tiered of this plot device. Along with "Fist Full of Datas" this makes two  
<holodeck shows in three months! They should be original or just show reruns!

This is the Moriarty episode that we have been waiting four years to get
resolved.  Give it a chance.  I've read the synopsis and like it.  I expect
there will be some boos when it is shown, but then again, every episode gets
boos when it airs :-(
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: janet@indetech.com (Janet Christian)
Subject: Re: Troi Smut????
Organization: Independence Technologies, Inc. Fremont, CA
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 18:25:48 GMT

In article <1992Dec31.123326.13351@bsu-ucs> 00cmmiller@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>In article <1992Dec30.030652.6199@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams) writes:
>> In article <1hqeteINN79b@bigboote.WPI.EDU> norbert@wpi.WPI.EDU (Timothy James) writes:
>>>
>>>A very trustworthy friend of mine SWEARS that
>>>Marina Sirtis (Coun. Troi) made a porn movie...
>>>Can anyone clear this up?
>>>
>> 
>> Yea...  Your friend doesn't know what he/she is talking about.
>> 
>> Either that or they consider R-rated films to be "porn".
>> 
>> Sigh.  WHEN will this idoitic excuse for a "rumor" EVER end?
>
>
>well, what was it called????!!!

It was called The Wicked Lady and also starred Faye Dunaway. I believe it was made in 1974.
-- 
   Janet Christian             jchristian@indetech.com

My boss agrees with everything I say - well, actually, he thinks I'm working.  
"Never argue with a Scorpio - it's frustrating and you'll lose, anyway..."
From: mitcheec@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu (Elliott Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: How far we have come (TOS==>DS9)
Date: 7 Jan 93 16:33:00 GMT
Organization: Vanderbilt University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

How far we have come from:

"<blink> What is this... <blink blink> kiss?"

to:

"<blink> What is this... <blink blink> time?"

The answer, of course, should have been:

"<blink blink> It's green!"

+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
| Elliott Mitchell.Peabody College.Vanderbilt University
|  Nashville, Tenn. Home of the Grand Ole Opry
|  IN: mitcheec@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu | BN: MITCHEEC@VUCTRVAX
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: wherndon@smiley.mitre.org (William Herndon)
Subject: Re: Best Episode?
Organization: The MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 15:42:08 GMT

In article <1993Jan6.143637.29934@newssun.med.miami.edu> dbrown@newssun.med.miami.edu (Daniel Brown) writes:
>
>                What is in your opinion the best eposiode of TNG?  I realize
>that are probably many, but try to choose one.  I catch a lot of the 
>re-runs on a local channel, but it's pretty unreliable (so I'd like to
>rent the videos of the good episodes I've missed).  
>

    Well... I know that this is a horribly conventional answer but, far
    and away, without question, _Yesterday's Enterprise_.  It has tension.
    It has special effects up the wazooo.  It has great performances by
    Patrick Stewart, the woman who played Captain Racheal Garret, and the
    guy who played Lt. Castillo.  It has BATTLES.  ( Let me say that again
    BATTLES!!!! )  It has Klingons doing what Klingons and their Birds of
    Prey do best, ripping into their enemies.  And on and on...
  
        EGAD! - What an episode!

    And now for the sensitive new age guy answer ( now that I've gotten
    the macho, shallow, dumb-guy answer out of the way ):  _Lal_ is my
    second favorite episode of all time.  The scene with Data and Lal at
    the end, when she thanks him for giving her life, always brings a tear
    to my eye.

    Just my two cents worth.

        	        	       	       	       	       	       	       
                                                               - Max

  | William R. Herndon               \ The MITRE Corporation, Dept. G023 |
  | EMail: wherndon@smiley.mitre.org  \    Secure Information Technology |
  | NeXTMail: bill@mephisto.gotham.com \                ( 703 ) 883-6393 |
  |                                                                      |
  |         "The world bores you when you're cool."   - Calvin           |

        	        	       	       	       	       	       	       
                                                               - Max

  | William R. Herndon               \ The MITRE Corporation, Dept. G023 |
  | EMail: wherndon@smiley.mitre.org  \    Secure Information Technology |
  | NeXTMail: bill@mephisto.gotham.com \                ( 703 ) 883-6393 |
  |                                                                      |
  |         "The world bores you when you're cool."   - Calvin           |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current