HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pele@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (David J. Duffield)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Playoff thoughts....(greatest game)
Date: 5 Jan 93 22:25:53 GMT
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucscb.ucsc.edu


In article <0fG_Ena00WDKM36X4z@andrew.cmu.edu> Vernon H Harmon <vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>SD@Miami--no game played this year.
>My guess is that SD will avenge their loss in the "greatest game ever
>played"(tm) and Washington will pull off the surprise upset (Washington

The greatest game?  Is this the 1981 (or was it 82) playoff game where the
game was finally won with a field goal in the second overtime?  If so, and
it should be, then SD finally won that one only to loose the very next week
in the "ice-bowl". 
 
>Once again using the above theory, it would be SD vs. Washington in the SB.

Gee that would be nice.  How many of these r.s.f.p posters would be wining
about that one?  (Great for networks though with the SD story and Wash-Humphries
story and the fact that it would be East -v- West (unlike 89 World Series with
SF and Oakland).

---David
"We're coming your way, we're going to dazzle you with our playing.  The time
	has come, you know we're shooting for number one.  With thunderbolts
	and lightening, we'll light up the skyyyy.  We'll give it all we've
	got and more with the Super Chargers............."

(for real football, tune into rec.sport.soccer)
From: xx10645@cehp15 (Xiaocun Xu)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Hail To The Redskins Song
Date: 8 Jan 93 21:14:37 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

danforth@trinity.llnl.gov (Bill A. Danforth) writes:

>Hello all,

>A while back, I posted a request for the lyrics to Hail to the Redskins.  I
>managed to get two responses (thanks to Brian Hunt[hunt@ipst.umd.edu] and
>Ro Utley[rutley1@cc.swarthmore.edu]), and the lyrics are:

>Hail to the Redskins
>Hail victory
"Hail to victory", I think.

>Braves on the warpath
>Fight for all D.C.
I just wondering here, was it suppose to be "fight for old D.C."

>Run and pass and score
>We want a lot more
>Beat 'em , swamp 'em , rush 'em 
>Let the points soar
>Fight on, fight on
>Til you have won
>Sons of Wash-ing-ton!
>rah! rah! rah!

>chorus


>I am posting these, as a result of kla!earl@sun.com's request for the lyrics,
>and I have a sneaky feeling that other people will be asking soon.

>Go 'Skins
>Bill Danforth
>danforth2@llnl.gov
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cowboys KILL Eagles
Date: 12 Jan 1993 20:45:50 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <C0r8ML.7ME@encore.com> kschnitz@encore.com (Kevin Schnitzius) writes:
>So, you do agree, then, that you are talking trash after the game?
>Oh, my.  How very big of you...

Nope, no trash talking from me.  I know better than you Eagle fans.

>Looks to me like you have neither the intelligence nor the spine to 
>support "your" team until they have actually won.  Pathetic, yes?

Anybody who has read this newsgroup knows how much I support my team,
but that's nothing that you deserve an explanation of.  You Eagle fans
just get your cookies all scrambled when you shoot your mouths off before
games and then your little heroes in green get their beaks shoved down
their throats.  Then you criticize others when they question what happened
to your team.  Pathetic is the Philadelphia Eagles and their fans, like you.

>It truly amazes me that someone can actually whine *after* their
>team has won.  Maybe you'd like to get your shovel out now and get
>a head start on this weekends game....

Who's whining?  We're WINNING!!!  There's a big difference, but as
an Eagle fan you would only know about the former.


Ray    GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pajerek@telstar.kodak.com (Don Pajerek)
Subject: Re: Is there one HONEST Bills fan?
Reply-To: pajerek@telstar.kodak.com (Don Pajerek)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp. - Telstar
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 19:07:32 GMT

In article <103575@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
>In article <1993Jan3.220421.7381@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:
>>FACTS:  The FAT LADY CHOKED and the DA BILLS came back
>>to win the greatest come from behind game in  
>>NFL HISTORY. 38-41
>>
>

And guess what? This 'greatest comeback in NFL history', and almost
certainly the greatest game in franchise history, WAS NOT SEEN IN
BUFFALO! That's right, the game didn't sell out, and so the blackout
was in effect. With the exception of those with access to satellite
dishes, no one in Buffalo or Rochester saw this game.

>>-- 
>> ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
>>"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
>>everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller


Don Pajerek

Standard disclaimers apply.
From: jcichock@ep.ieee.org (J Cichocki)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Miami Dolphins Song
Date: 8 Jan 93 20:42:01 GMT
Reply-To: jcichock@ep.ieee.org
Organization: IEEE, New York, NY


Anyone out there happen to know what the Dolphin fight (?) song is? I know it's a rip-off the Houston Oilers song, but the words are different. Hopefully, they will be
able to use it on Sunday. I would appreciate the help. You can post directly to my email also. Thanks. JEFF
Have a great weekend.
GO EAGLES !!   GO DOLPHINS!!   GO STEELERS!!   GO REDSKINS!!
From: allen@tessi.com (Allen Warren)
Subject: Re: Young VS. Montana (My Thoughts)
Organization: Test Systems Strategies, Inc., Beaverton, Oregon
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:13:03 GMT

athos@apple.com (Rick Eames) writes:

>Now we have a situation where the coach has decided that even though Joe is
>the higher paid, former starter, it will take the demise of Steve Young
>(not the team) to get Montana in there. 

Is Montana's rhythm and timing back?  One half does not a quarterback make.
Can Montana be the same Montana of old in the face of a typical Washington
or Dallas pass rush?

>All I can say is: remember the Colts and the Jets?  The Colts had Unitis
>warming the bench, perfectly healthy because his replacement was MVP.  The
>Colts lost too.

Unitas played in that Super Bowl.  Yes, he did NOT start, but he still played
and the Colts still lost.  Unitas could not pull off another miracle that day,
but he DID play.

allen
From: cfmdc@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Michael Cook)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The FAT LADY IS SINGING in BUFFALO!
Date: 5 Jan 93 22:52:56 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Educational Computing Network

I hope that all of you who counted the Bills out during the third
quarter are appropriately contrite.  I will admit that I was tense, but
I kept faith (and I would feel stupid and ashamed if I had given up).
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jab55062@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (The World Reknown Jason Boskey)
Subject: The Unofficial Final odds for my pool.:
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 08:13:20 GMT


OK, these are the unofficial odds for my superbowl pool.  As I've said, it's 
based on the amount of money I receive, not the amount bet.  My official final
odds will be posted by Sunday.  OK here it goes


San Francisco         7-5
Dallas                3-1
San Diego             6-1
Miami                 7-1
Washington           12-1
Philadelphia         15-1
Pittsburgh           19-1
Buffalo              19-1


Remember, these are not official because they are based on what people told me
they would bet.  The official odds, with exact parimutuel payouts, will be
posted on Saturday.



____________________________________________________________________________
|The World Reknown Jason Boskey           | Mail: Bosk@uiuc.edu            |  
|Known throughout the World as The Bosk   |"Christ, you know it ain't easy,|
|All Rights Reserved, All Lefts Enhanced  |You know how hard it can be,    |
|-----------------------------------------|The way things are goin'        |
|"Here they come spinning out of the turn"|They're gonna crucify me"       |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: kellyfj@unix1.tcd.ie (Q)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Bills are magic!
Date: 4 Jan 93 14:06:38 GMT
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin


Wow what a game. At 28-3 down I said the Bills are out! 35-3 no way, I
mean Jimbo wasn't on the field, and maybe if Elway or Montana was a Bill
player I might suspect a comeback. 

WHO NEEDS SUPERBOWLS WHEN YOU CAN MAKE A COMEBACK LIKE THAT!

I always believed Moon was a choker! I've known a few games that when It
REALLY comes down to it he throws an int.

On the whole though PURE MAGIC! Will Buffalo be able to re-create that
magic AT pittsburgh I wonder!

--FRANK
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M)
Subject: Re: Eagles One Game from Super Bowl
Reply-To: dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 21:26:26 GMT

In article <TAK.93Jan4104832@tazboy.jpl.nasa.gov> tak@tazboy.jpl.nasa.gov (Tom Kreitzberg) writes:
>
>If the Eagles beat the Cowboys next week, they'll go to the Super
>Bowl. They got more out of the loss during the season to the 49'ers
>than the 49'ers got from the win, and there is no chance that they

Yep.  It was just one more win in a 14-2 season, with the last 8 in a
row.

>will lose a second time. If it's Washington, then it's at Vet Stadium,
>and the Eagles will not lose in Vet Stadium, particularly to the

Gee.  Why don't we just tell the 49ers and Redskins to go and play on
the beach somewhere rather than play the game?  Since neither team
has a chance against the mighty Eagles.  (From the post, no one would
guess that the Eagles are a mighty 1-2 against these teams.)

>Redskins. They can't. They just couldn't do that to me.

Give them a chance. :-)

>
>	Tom


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bernie@lgc.com (Bernie De La Torre)
Subject: Re: Chiefs Kickers
Organization: Landmark Graphics LGC
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 20:24:50 GMT

In article <1993Jan4.144039.3523@cfmu.eurocontrol.be>, don@cfmu.eurocontrol.be (Don Hughes) writes:
|> 
|> I am a long-time KC Chiefs fan who has lived through many ups and downs
|> over the years since Super Bowl IV (this year was no exception). There
|> is one area, however, where the Chiefs have been remarkably consistent.
|> Whereas most NFL teams change placekickers faster than Eastern Europe
|> changes its borders, to my knowledge the Chiefs have had just two in a
|> period of over 20 years!
|> 
|> I was wondering if anyone could provide me with the career statistics
|> for both Jan Stenerud and Nick Lowery. I would like to know seasons
|> played, games played, FGs, FG % and points. I would also like to know
|> how they rank amongst the all-time NFL leaders in these areas. In the
|> case of Stenerud, this includes the time he spent with the Packers and
|> the Vikings.
|> 
|> Thanks!  

Nick Lowery's lifetime completion percentage is .801. This was the highest
accuracy rate in the league until the last week of the regular season.
Pete Stoyanovich kicked his 100th field goal then, and qualified for the
league's all time accuracy rate. Stoyanovich's percentage is .808.

-- 
*-------------------------------------------------------------*
*    Bernie de la Torre  Landmark Graphics Corporation
*    333 Cypress Run     Houston, Texas 77094   (713)-579-4680
*    bdelatorre@lgc.com  Rm 247
*-------------------------------------------------------------*
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Skywalker)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Cowboys vs Niners
Date: 11 Jan 1993 16:45:45 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

Dallas should have one large advantage vs the Niners.
Norv Turner the Offensive Coordinator for Dallas came from the 
Rams, he knows the SF system very well he saw them twice a year.
Will this help Dallas preperations this week, the 9ers will have 
to depend on film only. One would think so.

[From the "Oh By the way" dept.]

Dallas has always practiced on natural grass, which they (groundskeepers)
are tearing up and wetting down as we speak. I guess they will have
to bring in a backhoe to simulate Candleslick, that field should be
closed down. No problem with grass but that place is ridiculous.....

The fact that Dallas has no defensive players in the pro-bowl has 
made the Boyz just a little mad, they look like a bunch of bikers
that just caught the offense messing with their cycles....

Early line  Dallas +5

Go Cowboys !!!!
tim
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: SF Bashing
Date: 5 Jan 1993 20:45:02 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu
Keywords: SF, Philadelphia, Dallas ...

In article <1993Jan5.200340.7913@leland.Stanford.EDU> punjabi@leland.Stanford.EDU (sanjeev punjabi) writes:
 >
 >TIM,
 >        SUCH VENOM YOU SPOUT!  SEEMS LIKE THE TRUTH HURTS, HUH?
 >
 >Sanjeev
 >
 >


Come on Sanjeev,
You can insult me but not dispute what I said. Can you ?

Damn, I should have used caplocks... 



[Article deleted]
From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:25:18 GMT
Subject: Re: Chiefs QB
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro

I laughed when all the Chief fans posted that Krieg was the saviour.  Wrong.
I've been watching the Hawks since the Zorn days.  Krieg is not consistent
enough to be a winner.  What makes anyone think he can pull it off when
he couldn't in Seattle (there actually were some damn good Hawk teams in
the past)?

With free agency looming no one should waste draft picks or players for 
a trade.  Simply buy a good QB on the open market during the off season.
I think Jay Shroeder is available.

Don Boell
"Just get a new QB baby"

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: stamber@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Kevin L. Stamber)
Subject: Delton Hall
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 18:23:18 GMT

     They didn't call him "Beltin' Delton" while he was playing
for Pittsburgh for nothing, eh?

     Enjoy the games this weekend.


"I strictly obey the NFL rules regarding exciting the home crowd, but
 I advise each and every man, woman and child entering Three Rivers
 Stadium this Saturday be wearing a Terrible Towel (tm) about the neck,
 so as to avoid catching a cold!"

                                        - Bill Cowher, 12/29/92

Kevin L. Stamber
Purdue University
COWHER POWER!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand)
Subject: Re: AFC vs. NFC drivel
Organization: Scientific Computing Division/NCAR Boulder, CO
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 07:10:25 GMT

  Here's some data that shows that the AFC best have trouble with the NFC, but
  the NFC best can easily beat the AFC.

  Yes, the NFC is dominant, especially over the last few years. The SB is just
  the icing on the cake.

  AFC Division Winners vs. NFC and NFC Division Winners vs. AFC, 1984-1992:
  By year:

              AFC                 NFC
  Year   %    W   L  T       %    W   L  T    Winner
  ---- -----  --------     -----  --------    ------
  1984 0.833  10-  2-0     0.667   8-  4-0     AFC
  1985 0.583   7-  5-0     0.750   9-  3-0     NFC
  1986 0.667   8-  4-0     0.917  11-  1-0     NFC
  1987 0.611   5-  3-1     0.636   7-  4-0     NFC
  1988 0.583   7-  5-0     0.583   7-  5-0     Tie
  1989 0.500   6-  6-0     0.833  10-  2-0     NFC
  1990 0.583   7-  5-0     0.750   9-  3-0     NFC
  1991 0.600   6-  4-0     0.917  11-  1-0     NFC
  1992 0.500   5-  5-0     0.833  10-  2-0     NFC
       0.609  61- 39-1     0.766  82- 25-0     NFC
  
  By team:
              AFC                                  NFC
    %   W  L  T Team                     %   W  L  T Team
  ----- ------- --------------------   ----- ------- --------------------
  1.000  2- 0-0 SAN DIEGO CHARGERS     1.000  4- 0-0 DETROIT LIONS
  1.000  1- 0-0 INDIANAPOLIS COLTS     0.875  7- 1-0 DALLAS COWBOYS
  0.750  9- 3-0 MIAMI DOLPHINS         0.833 10- 2-0 NEW YORK GIANTS
  0.750  6- 2-0 LOS ANGELES RAIDERS    0.821 23- 5-0 SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS
  0.750  3- 1-0 NEW ENGLAND PATRIOT    0.818  9- 2-0 WASHINGTON REDSKINS
  0.694 12- 5-1 DENVER BRONCOS         0.750  3- 1-0 NEW ORLEANS SAINTS
  0.625  5- 3-0 CINCINNATI BENGALS     0.750  3- 1-0 LOS ANGELES RAMS
  0.562  9- 7-0 BUFFALO BILLS          0.667 16- 8-0 CHICAGO BEARS
  0.500  8- 8-0 CLEVELAND BROWNS       0.625  5- 3-0 MINNESOTA VIKINGS
  0.500  4- 4-0 PITTSBURGH STEELERS    0.500  2- 2-0 PHILADELPHIA EAGLES
  0.250  1- 3-0 SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
  0.250  1- 3-0 HOUSTON OILERS
--
Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
From: zz96pc@sdacs.ucsd.edu (Pedro Cruz)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: My picks
Keywords: ya right!
Date: 5 Jan 93 20:30:43 GMT
Distribution: usa



Everyone is doing it.

My predictions:

Pittsburgh 24,  Buffalo 21  Close game but Buffalo has shot
			    its wad.

San Diego 27,  Miami 13     Someone call Green Peace! Some sea
			    mammals are going to be abused....

San Francisco 32, Washington 16   Wash is good but SF is to good.

Dallas 20, Philadelphia 16  Home field advantage just enough for
			    the Cowboys

See ya next week!!
                           -Dro
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (S. Hariharan )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Predictions.
Date: 12 Jan 93 02:18:07 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.C0pyE7.DGH
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

I agree that it would be better to see the Bills represent the
AFC in the Super-Bowl.  

I would rather see the Bills playing the 9ers in the SB rather
than see Marino and his Dolphs make a fool of themselves in
front of a global audience (The SB is viewed in many countries
I guess).

S.H
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!)
Subject: Re: Interesting Playoff Stat.
Organization: Yale University
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 13:53:53 GMT

In article <1993Jan8.204323.28285@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> john@ice.stx.com (John DiMarzio) writes:
>From: john@ice.stx.com (John DiMarzio)
>Subject: Interesting Playoff Stat.
>Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 20:43:23 GMT
>I read today in the Washington post that since the NFL has gone to the
>3 Wildcard playoff format three years ago the teams that have had a first
>round bye are 8-0.  Also the winning margin has averaged 17.5 points with
>only one game being closer than 10 points.  A little rest does a body
>good eh?
>
>
>John DiMarzio


Apparently the streak continues!  
ALN
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chow@cssn0b.ssc.gov (Ivan Chow)
Subject: tape for Bills/Oilders game
Reply-To: chow@cssn0b.ssc.gov
Organization: SSC.
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 14:51:32 GMT

Hi Fans,
   I am not a Bills fan, so I didn't watch the game at all.
But after reading all you guys comments and the newpaper comments.
I can stop my desire.  I don't want to miss such a record game.
Is there anyone in the Dallas area has taped this game?
I am willing to pay....  (Most of my friends are Cowboys fans.
None of them are Bills fans (but some are Oilers fans)
And I am a 49ers fan!!)

GO 49ers!  Go for the 5!

Ivan

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M)
Subject: Re: Free Agency
Reply-To: dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 18:18:51 GMT

In article <1iuu40INNoov@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Skywalker) writes:
>In article <1993Jan12.170359.21739@kronos.arc.nasa.gov> blah@maas-neotek.arc.nasa.gov (MJW/TWF) writes:
>>[stuff deleted]
>
> >Note also that I'm a Dallas fan, although I'm kind of glad that we
> >cannot sign White (I think his presence would screw things up - the
> >same way Jackson's did in Miami).
>
>True but remember Steve Beuerline will be leaving and most likely 
>will sign in the 2Mil range which means dallas CAN sign a player
>for that ammount of cash......I agree I don't want Reggie or

Actually, the rule states that you can sign a free agent for
no more than the departing player HAD been paid by his former
team - NOT for what he got from his new team.  What is he
making now?

This only applies to the 49ers, Cowboys, Dolphins and Bills.

The Chargers, Redskins, Eagles and Steelers can sign one free
agent for up to 1.5M even if they lose no players.

I guess all other teams are free to do whatever they wish.

>any other Eagles for that matter.....nothing but trouble....
>
>
>tim
From: vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu (Vernon H Harmon)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: POOF! The carriage turn back into a PUMKIN!
Date: 10 Jan 93 18:33:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.IfIDWCm00WDK48EWJo
	<1993Jan11.002310.12834@Princeton.EDU>
Organization: Senior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Excerpts from netnews.rec.sport.football.pro: 11-Jan-93 Re: POOF! The
carriage turn.. Frank Bilotti@wanda.prin (989)

> Unfortunately, I wasn't able to see the final playoff blowout of the day.
>  How did the fins overcome the loss of Offerdahl.  It always seemed to me
> (as a casual observer) that he was the main man for that defense.  I know
> that the Fins D is much improved, but a shutout without their best
> linebacker?  What happened in this game?

rather simply, actually. They crowded the line of scrimmage with 8 men
which prevented SD from getting the run going. By the time SD started
getting the ground game going, Humphries had thrown 3 INT's and the
score was 21-0, hence there was no more running game. Miami played an
outstanding game and I really hope Marino gets his ring this year,
finally!

Good Luck Fish!!!

--Vernon.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: root@june.cmp.rpi.edu (J.R. Ordon)
Subject: Re: Dallas will win SB
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 19:36:03 GMT

In article <4557@winnie.fit.edu> mcs77695@zach.fit.edu ( PALACIOS) writes:
>Top 10 Reasons Why Dallas will win SB
>
>10. Dallas has #1 overall D
>9.  San Fran has the 26th passing D
>8.  Dallas had a tough regular season schedule.
and the niners didn't?? Do you call the saints (twice), the bills,vikings,
and the dolphins easy???

>7.  AFC has no chance
Yeah? That's what they said about the NY JETS when they played the colts in the
super bowl... we know what happened..


>6.  Jimmy Johnson has a better haircut than George Seifert
IYHO, neither haircut is anything to brag about.

>5.  E Smith is at his peak
>4.  Dallas has too much team speed
Well if it's muddy, team speed won't mean a thing..

>3.  E Smith is the real NFC MVP not Steve Young
>2.  Michael Irvin is tougher than Rice O Roni

Again, IYO. I've seen Jerry Rice take some pretty good hits, let's not
argue who is the better receiver, Irvin will lose BIG TIME!!!

>1.  Dallas D is pissed about pro bowl selections. 
Dallas FANS are pissed, their D is thinking about Rice,taylor etc...

>
>
>
>Predictions
>
>Dallas     30          
>San Fran   10

Wake up, the dream's over!!!

Whoever wins, it'll be by less than 10 points

--------------------------------------
J.R. Ordon