HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: matthieu@laas.fr (Matthieu Herrb)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,gnu.emacs.help
Subject: GNU emacs for Solaris 2 ?
Date: 9 Sep 92 14:42:10 GMT
Reply-To: Matthieu.Herrb@laas.fr
Followup-To: comp.unix.solaris
Distribution: comp
Organization: LAAS-CNRS Toulouse, France


	Some time ago I saw a discussion about portings of GNU emacs
to Solaris 2.

	Now we have some machines installed with Solaris 2, so what is
the status of emacs/Solaris 2 ? Is there an ``official'' version
available ?

	Thank you in advance.

					Matthieu
 
--
	Matthieu Herrb             CNRS - LAAS 
	Matthieu.Herrb@laas.fr     7, avenue du Colonel Roche
        	                   31077 Toulouse Cedex - France

	"War -- What is it good for ? -- Absolutely nothing !"
Xref: sparky comp.unix.solaris:212 comp.protocols.ppp:766
From: chas@visionware.co.uk (Charles Hirst)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Need PPP for SunOs 4.1.2
Date: 14 Sep 92 07:41:59 GMT
Distribution: eunet
Organization: VisionWare Ltd., Leeds, UK
Originator: chas@poohbear

The subject says it all.  I need PPP for SunOS 4.1.2 (Solaris 1.1).
I have checked the Archie server at Imp Col to no avail.  Can somebody email me
a FTP site which contains the above.

Many thanks

Charles Hirst
Xref: sparky comp.unix.solaris:217 comp.unix.programmer:4675 comp.unix.wizards:3920
From: zj8549@trotter.usma.edu (Junod John MSG)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.programmer,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Segmentation faults on sun4 platforms
Date: 15 Sep 92 22:36:33 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Organization: US Military Academy, West Point, NY

Can't seem to figure this one out.  We are porting some code to a 
sun4 platform, specifically a Sparc 2 and Sparc IPC, from System V.
Its SunOS 4.1.

I keep getting "segmentation faults" from the following code extracts.
There is considerably more code and multiple source files.  The end
of routine2 correctly prints the contents of buf, but buf is a null
pointer after the return from routine2.

Can someone please help point out the error of my ways?  Is there some
way to increase stack size (or heap size or whatever)?  Or am I way
off track?

routine() {
   char buf[256];
   int retcode;
   strcpy(buf,"initialized");
   retcode=routine1(buf);
   ....
}
routine1(buf) char *buf; {
   char buf1[256];
   int retcode;
   ......
   puts(buf);          /* prints ok */
   retcode=routine2(buf);
   puts(buf);          /* prints NULL */
   strcpy(buf1,buf);   /* segmentation fault */ 
   .....
   return retcode;
}
routine2(buf) char *buf; {
   int retcode;
   ......
   puts(buf);          /* prints ok */
   /* modify contents of buf */
   puts(buf);          /* prints ok */
   return retcode;
}

THANKS IN ADVANCE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MSG John Junod <zj8549@trotter.usma.edu>    <postmaster@trotter.usma.edu>
Chief, Academic Network Engineering Branch         
United States Military Academy, West Point NY 10996
Phone: (914)-938-5038/9 or AV: 688-5038/9
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.shell
From: latesh@genghis.borland.com (Latesh Bhatia)
Subject: Re: tcsh for Solaris 2.0 !
Followup-To: latesh@borland.com
Originator: latesh@genghis.borland.com
Organization: Borland International
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 20:27:32 GMT


Hi!

I was wondering if anyone has used...

	      "The Unix C Shell Field Guide" 
			    by
	       Gail Anderson & Paul Anderson

I'm curious as to how readable the book really is, or is it the standard
cryptic BS.  I had glanced thru a copy at a bookstore and was quite 
pleased, but I'm looking for a second opinion.

I'd also appreciate any suggestions on any other books that are out there
on the same topic.


Thanx,

Latesh   

                      ****** latesh@borland.com ******
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.sys.sun.misc,comp.unix.programmer
From: kuku@acds.physik.rwth-aachen.de (Christoph Kukulies)
Subject: lpd (lat) "no daemon present" patch 
Keywords: lpd lat patchnov91
Reply-To: kuku@acds.physik.rwth-aachen.de
Organization: I.Physikalisches Institut RWTH-Aachen
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 10:07:04 GMT


I tried to install the lpd_patchnov91 which is said to be available from

trix::patches/{V4.0,V4.1,V4.2}/{vax,mips}/lpd

It turns out that this patch,when applied to a Ultrix 4.1 distribution
results in an undefined symbol  'm_copydata' when linking the new kernel.

The patch exchanges the modules lta.o, tty.o and lat_scl1.o. The latter
(lat_scl1.o) contains the undefined reference.


My questions are:

(1) Is this a known problem?

(2) did I miss something?

(3) Is there a working patch available? (eventually at an Internet site)

(4)  Where or how can a 'mundane' Internet (non-Decnet) user access

      TRIX::patches ?

NB: The above patch is said to amend problems related with LAT printer
queue sharing between Ultrix and VMS printer queues. One nasty problem
which we are presently have no cure for is that the VMS queue hangs, after 
something has been printed via lpd from the Ultrix machine.
 

--
--Chris
Christoph P. U. Kukulies
kuku@acds.physik.rwth-aachen.de
*** Error code 1
 
Stop.
From: robm@ataraxia.Berkeley.EDU (Rob McNicholas)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: :permission denied?
Date: 8 Sep 92 12:12:25
Organization: Technical and Computing Services, U.C. Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
	<1354@niktow.canisius.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ataraxia.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: pavlov@niktow.canisius.edu's message of 8 Sep 92 03:13:22 GMT

In article <1354@niktow.canisius.edu> pavlov@niktow.canisius.edu (Greg Pavlov) writes:
     We encounter something similar using su (legitimately...).  The
     command does what it is supposed to, but we typically get the
     following message: 

       /dev/ttyp2: permission denied



When you rlogin to a system, you become the owner of the pty you've
connected through.  If you su to someone who doesn't have permission
to write to your pty (usually anyone other than root), and they have
some line in their .cshrc file which is attempting to modify the pty
(for example, an stty, biff, or mesg command), that command will fail
with the "permission denied" message.

"su -f user" should avoid this.

Another thing to watch out for is su'ing to someone who doesn't have
search permission to the current directory.  Then you get
"getwd: Permission denied -- can't start new shell"

-Rob

--
Rob McNicholas     	    Technical & Computing Services, EECS, U.C. Berkeley
robm@ataraxia.berkeley.edu  Voice: 510/642-8633  FAX: 510/643-7846
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: avolio@dco.DEC.COM (Frederick M. Avolio)
Subject: Re: ? Motif iconic shell / file manager ??
Keywords: icon shell, file manager
Reply-To: avolio@dco.DEC.COM (Frederick M. Avolio)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp., Washington ULTRIX Resource Center
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:13:24 GMT


Visix Corp makes one as does IXI (X.desktop).

Fred
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: jdr@sloth.mlb.semi.harris.com (Jim Ray)
Subject: rstatd + ruserd
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 18:36:45 GMT
Distribution: us
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne FL
Keywords: rstat, ruser

Anyone out there have an rstatd and an ruserd that work properly under
ultrix 4.2 or greater?

I have an older version that with some effort can be made to work, but
unfortunately, it will not work properly with Ultrix inetd.

I think this one was created by Brendan Kehoe.  Also, it doesn't
support the latest version of rstat ( 4 ) from sun.

Any ideas?

-- 
Jim Ray                                Harris Semiconductor
Internet:  jdr@semi.harris.com         PO Box 883   MS 62B-022
Phone:     (407) 729-5059              Melbourne, FL  32901
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu (Eiji Hirai)
Subject: Re: Help with ln -f -s
Organization: Information Services, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 17:30:12 GMT

mamros@athena.lkg.dec.com (Shawn Mamros) writes:
> It turns out to be a bug in ln (one which should be fixed
> in a not-too-distant future release).  In the meantime, the only real
> workaround is ...

Or, you can install GNU's version of "ln".  You can get it at:

	ftp.uu.net:packages/gnu/fileutils-3.3.tar.Z

I've been using it without any problems and in particular, doesn't have the
above-mentioned bug.

--
Eiji Hirai <hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu>    :     :    :   :  : :: ::: :::: :::::
Unix Hacker for Swarthmore College      :     :    :   :  : :: ::: :::: :::::
Information Services, Swarthmore, PA, USA.      Copyright 1992 by Eiji Hirai.
I don't speak for Swarthmore College.                    All Rights Reserved.
From: frank@croton.nyo.dec.com (Frank Wortner)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: copying from tape remotely (rmt tar rmt0h)
Keywords: rmt tar tape
Date: 14 Sep 92 14:19:12 GMT
Reply-To: frank@nyo.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


You can do simple cases like so:

	rsh remote_machine dd if=/dev/rmt0h bs=10k | tar xvf -

to extract, and

	tar cvf - | rsh remote_machine dd of=/dev/rmt0h bs=10k

to write.

GNU tar will also do what you want:

	gtar xvf remote_machine:/dev/rmt0h


					Frank
Xref: sparky comp.unix.ultrix:6930 comp.lang.perl:5954
From: braun@aa.cad.slb.com (Matthew Braun)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix,comp.lang.perl
Subject: Re: 'less' as man pager
Date: 15 Sep 92 19:33:17 GMT
Organization: Applicon; Ann Arbor, MI (USA)
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

If you don't have System adminstration power but would still like to use
less as the pager for man, you can do the following:

have a directory in your path before /usr/ucb, e.g. ~/bin
link page to less:  cd ~/bin ; ln -s /usr/local/bin/less page
man sure it will find your page, instead of /usr/ucb's:  rehash

This has a slight advantage over the alias man option.  When you attempt
to man something that is not found it will not run a pager program.
Where if you pipe "man <page> | less" it will always run less (then you
have to press 'q' to quit).


Tom Limoncelli (tal@Warren.MENTORG.COM) wrote:
: Why not just switch to the version of man re-written in Perl?
: (available on ftp.uu.net).  It does everything man does on other
: systems, plus it's faster than ones written in "C".  You can set
: it up for various pagers, or just "setenv PAGER foo" to use "foo".
: 
: There is a paper in the first or second Usenix LISA conference
: proceedings called "The Answer to all Man's Problems".  Read it,
: learn it, love it.  Perl.

What is Perl?  And, I don't know what Usenix LISA conference is.

Also, where can "man-1.1" be found?  I ran 'archie man' but didn't see any
entries that looked right.

Thanks,

Matthew.

ps. Hi Dan
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: skok@itwds1.energietechnik.uni-stuttgart.de (Holger Skok)
Subject: Re: Printcap for HP PaintJet XL
Organization: Inst. f. Thermodynamik u. Waermetechnik (ITW), U. of Stuttgart, FRG
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 07:14:05 GMT

In article <Sep07.170326.84194@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> bricker@osprey.cahs.colostate.edu (Chris Bricker) writes:
>Hello,
>
>Does anyone have a printcap entry for a Hewlett Packard PaintJet XL printer.
>I am trying to use a printcap for a LJ250PCL but I am not getting the proper
>output.
>
>Thanks in advance, Chris.
>*****************************************************************
>Chris Bricker					*  Today's	*
>College of Applied Human Sciences		*  actions are	*
>Colorado State University, Ft Collins CO	*  tomorrow's	*
>INTERNET: bricker@osprey.cahs.colostate.edu	*  realities.	*
>*****************************************************************

More info, please. The unchanged entries suggested by the lprsetup
utility worked for me and a paintJetXL. 
I didn't play around with it much, though. 
-- 
*************************************************
*	Those stupid, horse-brained masses! 	*
*			OPUS on honker surgery  *
*******************************************HSK***
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: user operator has uid 0 and not root.
From: mccalld@vax.sonoma.edu
Date: 14 Sep 92 10:11:06 -0800
Organization: Sonoma State University

Greetings:
    I'm working from a COPS report which says  Warning! Password 
file, line 56, user operator has uid = 0 and is not root.........
Now, I am trying to make it so that user operator can only login from
the system console (ie secure defined port), and doesn't need a 
password, and is put into SCAMP directly upon login.....I have modified
SCAMP so that the exit to system selection on the main menu is now
a loggout option, thus the operator can never get into the system
......
I'd really like COPS to run without errors....
And I would like the aforesaid features for the operator uid to function
as stated.
Any ideas???
thanks ahead of time....
mccalld@sonoma.edu

Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix,comp.editors
From: rohit@NeoSoft.com (Rohit Mehrotra)
Subject: Re: CRISP (v2.2e) under ULTRIX 4.1 problems
Organization: /etc/organization
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 13:14:06 GMT

In article <4916@daily-planet.concordia.ca> marak@mizar.concordia.ca ( Mike Marak) writes:
>HELP !!!
>  I'm trying to install CRISP on our DECstations here (DS5000/200 running
>ULTRIX 4.1). I've managed to finally get a clean compile, and have the
>executable (cr, not xcrisp). I can 'cr filename' and up pops the crisp
>screen in my window, with the file displayed. However, nothing happens
>when I type most characters on the keyboard, and I have to kill the
>process (I can CTRL-Z out and then 'kill nn' it)
>

This is a known problem under 2.2e and will never be fixed as CRISP
is now a commercial product, with a multitude of added features, 
bug fixes and a full blown X implementation in addition to the 
Character version.

In order to get more information send a mail to:
		owner-crisp-list@uunet.uu.net
		or
		owner-xcrisp-list@uunet.uu.net
-- 
Rohit Mehrotra
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VITAL				| 	10755 Meadowglen Lane, #238
Ph: 713-781-7406		| 	Houston, TX 77042.
Xref: sparky comp.unix.ultrix:6917 comp.sys.dec:5002
From: ccs@aber.ac.uk (Christopher "Jd" Samuel)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix,comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: talk: how to fix - "[Checking for invitation...]"?
Date: 15 Sep 92 16:43:58 GMT
Organization: University of Wales - Aberystwyth - Prifysgol Cymru

In article <BuMH54.BLr@grebyn.com>, karl@grebyn.com (Karl A. Nyberg)
writes:

|> I have several vaxes running Ultrix (4.0 & 4.2) that can talk together
|> just fine between themselves.  However they can't talk to other machines
|> on the network (locally a Sun4, or remotely also a Sun4, I think).  I get
|> the "[Checking for invitation...]" message when running talk.  When running
|> "otalk", the second machine will get a message from the Talk_Daemon requesting 
|> a connection, but the talk itself will fail with:
|> 
|> Unable to connect with initiator : 
|> 	Address family not supported by protocol family (47)]
|> 
|> How do I fix that?  (I'm presuming it's a problem on the VAX/Ultrix side,
|> since the Suns will gladly talk between themselves).

Actually, it is a Sun problem, as they are running the old style talk
daemon on port 517, instead of the new style ones which run on port 518.
Take a look at the manual page for talk, and the lines for talk and ntalk
(new talk) in /etc/services.

- Chris

-- 
 Christopher Samuel, c/o Computer Unit, UCW Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth, WALES
  RFC: ccs@aber.ac.uk   UUCP: *!mcsun!uknet!aber!ccs   JNT: ccs@uk.ac.aber
          Deddf Iaith Newydd i Gymru | New Language Act for Wales
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: kenh@leps5.phys.psu.edu (Ken Hornstein)
Subject: Re: rstatd + ruserd
Keywords: rstat, ruser
Organization: Penn State, Laboratory for Elementary Particle Science
Distribution: us
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 20:05:04 GMT

In article <1992Sep8.183645.29113@mlb.semi.harris.com> jdr@sloth.mlb.semi.harris.com (Jim Ray) writes:
>Anyone out there have an rstatd and an ruserd that work properly under
>ultrix 4.2 or greater?
>
>I have an older version that with some effort can be made to work, but
>unfortunately, it will not work properly with Ultrix inetd.

Yet another question ... does anyone have _clients_ for these daemons?  I got
the sun RPC 4.0 distribution, but they don't include clients like rup.

--Ken
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: smccoy@dw3g.ess.harris.com (Scott McCoy)
Subject: Question: dxmail - including orig text in reply
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 16:51:58 GMT
Reply-To: smccoy@dw3g.ess.harris.com (Scott McCoy)
Organization: Harris Corporation Information Systems Division


Subject line says it.  I need some help figuring out how
to include the original text from a mail message into
dxmail, preferably prefixed with '|> ' before each
line.

I've RTFM pages, but they assume too much knowledge
on my part.

Ultrix v4.2 (Rev 96).

Thanx.
----
Scott McCoy	Harris ISD	Opinions expressed are my own.
		Internet: 	smccoy@dw3g.ess.harris.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: vixie@pa.dec.com (Paul A Vixie)
Subject: Re: sendmail implementations
Organization: DEC Network Software Lab
Date: 11 Sep 92 14:22:02

inetd just sets up the stdin/stdout of the process to be the incoming net
stream.  you need to make sure sendmail will start up wanting to speak smtp
on stdin/stdout; try "-bs -ba" for this.

however, you really really really do not want to do this.  sendmail is its
own daemon for a set of good reasons which, if you do not understand them,
you should not ignore.
--
Paul Vixie, DEC Network Systems Lab	
Palo Alto, California, USA         	"Don't be a rebel, or a conformist;
<vixie@pa.dec.com> decwrl!vixie		they're the same thing, anyway.  Find
<paul@vix.com>     vixie!paul		your own path, and stay on it."  -me
From: grosen@isc.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu (Johannes Grosen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: debugging processes on 5000/133/240
Date: 11 Sep 92 14:18:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: plains.20277
Organization: North Dakota State University

One of my users was having trouble with a program when it was run
as a child of another process. I said, "No problem!" and suggested
that he simply debug the running process. Well, we fired up dbx
and I looked for 'attach' or something similiar but no joy. "No
problem!" I exclaimed and fired up gdb since I use it on my unix-
based pc all the time for this. Again, no joy! gdb says "Can't
attach processes on this machine." Well, I poke around the source
for gdb and it appears that attach/detach aren't supported for
decstations (or other MIPS-based machines). Is this a hardware
limitation? Are there any debuggers for the DECstation that allow
one to debug running processes via something like 'attach'?

-- 
Johannes Grosen
ISC Group System Administrator
401E Minard Hall
North Dakota State University
(701) 237-8409
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: shaggy@av8r.uucp (Chris Taylor)
Subject: How can I create a boot tape?
Organization: Daniel Webster College, Nashua, NH
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 02:12:38 GMT


     I'm using a DECsystem 5400 running Ultrix 4.2a. My system's
software distribution tapes are self-booting: slap a tape in the
drive, turn the machine on, and off you go. I'd like to create a
self-booting tape for restoring files from a backup. It doesn't need
to be anything fancy -- just enough so that I can restore my files,
list directories, make filesystems, and perform whatever other tasks
are necessary to restoring a crashed filesystem.
     After looking through the most of the manuals, though, I've found
nothing that describes how to create such a tape. Could someone who's
made one explain the process? My system uses a TK70 tape drive.
-- 
Chris Taylor (N1KFM)     decvax!av8r!shaggy  or  shaggy@av8r.uucp
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: fct@swlrgj (Fred Thompson)
Subject: Re: Software test of Floating Point Unit in 5000/240??
Organization: Raytheon Company, Tewksbury, MA
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:00:53 GMT

In <18o7urINNppv@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> paul@aztec.ucsc.edu (Paul Tatarsky) writes:

>A prof pointed out that the little code frag at the end of this 
>note was producing bad output on one of our 5000/240's and not on the
>other ones. I checked the kernel for anything odd, and then the manuals,
>and I have two questions:

>1. What is the story with the EMULFILT option? Older manuals say don't
>use it if you _have_ an fpu, newer ones say don't remove it from the
>config file. Well, it wasn't in my config file and when I added it
>and rebuilt/rebooted, I got the same results. 

>2. Anyone have a sure fire software test of the FPU unit? 

>What is going on here? Further configuration info available on request.
>Eternal thanks to anyone with a solution.


You probably have a bad floating point chip (FPU) and need to have DEC 
replace it. When these go bad, other things also show up as problems,
like graphics programs can't draw circles any more, ntp can't keep
the date correctly, etc.

In regards to EMULFILT (I think it's EMULFLT), we leave it in and it doesn't
seem to make a difference. I think the newer versions of the OS look to
see if there is a FPU and then use the code if there isn't.

-- 
Fred Thompson,   ...!ulowell!swlvx2!fct  or  fct@swlvx2.msd.ray.com
Raytheon Co,     Missile Systems Division, Tewksbury, Mass. 01876
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: bill@banana.fedex.com (bill daniels)
Subject: dxterm and xterm F11 key
Summary: can I use F11 with (d)xterm
Keywords: can I use F11 with (d)xterm
Organization: Federal Express Corp.
Distribution: comp
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 20:07:00 GMT

How can I make dxterm or xterm use F11 as F11 instead of <esc>?  At least
for dxterm there is a customization menu that purports to change the
key, but there really seems to be no effect when changed.  For xterm, I
can't find anything anywhere that mentions F11.

I am running Ultrix 4.2a on a DS5000/125 with mwm and xdm.

bill
-- 
these ravings are in no way sanctioned by federal express corp
bill daniels                    | voice:  (901)797-6328
federal express corp            | fax:    (901)797-6388
box 727-2891, memphis, tn 38194 | email:  bill@banana.dis.fedex.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: harvell@cnfusd.mko.dec.com (America a great place to get your knickers twisted)
Subject: Re: Anybody using an infoserver with Ultrix client? (heap'em big'um problems)
Reply-To: harvell@cnfusd.mko.dec.com (America a great place to get your knickers twisted)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 17:10:31 GMT


If anyone else is using Infoserver client for ULTRIX and having problems please
send me mail.  I am the current owner of the code and would like to make sure
any problems being encountered are being addressed.

Thanks

--
                                                                         
 L. Scott Harvell             "America a great place to get your knickers
 harvell@cnfusd.enet.dec.com   twisted"

 Certainly no one would claim these opinions, other then me!
Xref: sparky comp.unix.ultrix:6920 comp.sys.dec:5003
From: ccs@aber.ac.uk (Christopher "Jd" Samuel)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix,comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: talk: how to fix - "[Checking for invitation...]"?
Date: 15 Sep 92 16:47:32 GMT
Organization: University of Wales - Aberystwyth - Prifysgol Cymru

Oops, I forgot to say that to talk to a sun you use the
otalk(1) command, as in:

aberda : (xrn6-15) 152 ->> otalk ccs@aberdq

-Chris

-- 
 Christopher Samuel, c/o Computer Unit, UCW Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth, WALES
  RFC: ccs@aber.ac.uk   UUCP: *!mcsun!uknet!aber!ccs   JNT: ccs@uk.ac.aber
          Deddf Iaith Newydd i Gymru | New Language Act for Wales
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix