From: v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Whiners 21, Saints 20
Date: 21 Nov 92 20:07:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1ejuj6INNsn1@morrow.stanford.edu>, GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold) writes...
>In article <By01w6.BxB@acsu.buffalo.edu>,
>v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...) writes:
> 
>>In article <1eej6oINN3dt@morrow.stanford.edu>, GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold) writes...
>>
>>>With exception the the 4th quarter, the Niners did not play their
>>>best ball game.  They showed up for 1 quarter and still won.  Do you
>>>really think the Saints would have even had a chance if the Niners
>>>had played their style of ball for 4 quarters?
>>>I always give credit when credit is due. The Saints probably played
>>>the best game I have ever watched them play. Unfortunately for
>>>them, it wasn't enough.
> 
>>Get this bullshit out of here.  You insinuate that the Saints did *absolutely
>>nothing* to keep the Niners from playing "their style of game," then go and
>>say, "I always give credit where credit is due."
> 
>Didn't I say above that the Saints played the best game I have ever
>seen them play?

No.  You said "probably."  And the insinuation was that the Saints played the
best game you'd seen them play but it wasn't enough to beat one quarter of 
"Niner football."

>Of course the Saints "D" had something to do with the fact that the
>49ers only had 38 yards of passing at the half.  But the 49ers also
>had something to do with those measly 38 yards.  Before I go any
>further, did you see the game Chet? I doubt it since it was a
>regional game, with you being back there in Buffalo and all!

Yes, I did see the game.  I watched it at work, where I watch all the games I
can on Sunday (Sunday is for football, not work!:)

>The 49ers did not play their style of ball the first 2 1/2 quarters.
>They played the Saints style of ball.

And what is that, praytell?

>Sure the Saints disrupted them, but the Niners also committed stupid
>mistakes. Lots of them!  Sorry, but the 49ers are capable of
>achieving more then 38 yards passing in 2 quarters on any defense
>when they are playing decently. When they play like shit, anything
>is possible with them.
> 
>>"I'm curious as to why you think the Bills' offense is superior to the 49ers."
>>                        --Tony Bechtold
>>
>>"I'm curious as to why you can't understand 34-31."
>>                        --Me
>>
>>                                        ---Chet Zeshonski

>How long ago was this posted?  Where does this even fit into the
>discussion? Last time I checked, we were talking about the Saints
>and Niners game.

Aagh.  It's a point of someone not being able to see what's going on (ie., the
Saints hand the Niners well in hand for three quarters, and then scragged their
best effort.)

>Do you really think that the Bills offensive talent man for man is
>better then the Niners?  

At least the equal.  The O-line especially, and Thurman Thomas *more* than
especially.


>                                                    Tony
>                                                 GO 49ERS!!!

					---Chet Zeshonski