HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu ("[*] Angel of Threes")
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: Gooley Emulator
Date: 2 Oct 92 16:37:51 GMT
	<TOMF.92Sep27105712@ai.bunny.gte.com>
Organization: Eaters of Wisdom
In-reply-to: tomf@ai.bunny.gte.com's message of 27 Sep 92 14:57:12 GMT

In article <TOMF.92Sep27105712@ai.bunny.gte.com> tomf@ai.bunny.gte.com (Tom Fawcett) writes:
>   mark-c-function

    HI, EVERYONE!  MY NAME IS MARK C. FUNCTION AND I AM A COMPUTER
SCIENCE MAJOR FROM WOBSBURY MASSACHUSETTS.

THE C IS FOR `CLOSTRIDIUM'.

--

                And for to se, and eek for to be seye
Mark-Jason Dominus 	  			    mjd@central.cis.upenn.edu
From: jcarroll@ferris.cray.com (Jeff Carroll)
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: DATE CALCS (mon - sun)
Date: 30 Sep 92 21:33:57 GMT
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.


In article <BvEIM5.MC3@inews.Intel.COM>, dmccart@gomez.intel.com (D. J. McCarthy) writes:
> Dave Polewka (al037@cleveland.Freenet.Edu) wrote:
> \ >####################################################################
> \ >   mmddyy                       .   backwards
> \ >             2                  .           
> \ >   092892 = 2 x 3 x 7741        .   298290 = 2 x 3 x 5 x 61 x 163 
> > >...............................mon..................................
> / >   ddmmyy                       .   backwards
> / >             5                  .             
> / >   280992 = 2 x 3 x 2927        .   299082 = 2 x 3 x 7 x 7121 
> / >####################################################################
> [....etc....]
> 
> 
> 	Were there even remotely interesting at one time?  I forgot.
> 

Is faintest purpose shred of now? doubt we.

Does at any all clue to have? hell no.

Jeff Carroll
carroll@lemon.cray.com

help i brain help think my shuffled is
From: dolan@nrlmry.navy.mil (Kent Paul Dolan)
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
Subject: spelling this stuff out real clearly
Date: 28 Sep 92 17:09:38 GMT

Gary Heston proposes having potential drug users sign away their rights
to government largesse for results of using the same drugs the
government is about to give them, in "the eugenic approach".

Still not good enough.  Something more like:

"Since the substance we are about to provide you, Free of Charge and in
as large a quantity as you can reasonably consume, is known or
suspected to cause mental impairment which is likely to leave you a
vegetable without sufficient mental faculties to support yourself as a
member of society, since that damage may be untraceable by normal
analytic processes, and occur only incrementally or long after the
incidence of using the substance we are about to provide, and since we
have no intention of supporting you for problems you cause yourself
from lack of common sense and a surplus of self-indulgence, do you
hereby agree to relinquish your rights to all government, charitable,
and other forms of support in the case that you later in life become
incapacitated, in any manner whatever?"

Can't participate in the social contract, can't abide living in reality,
opt out, but take all the consequences up front.

I'd be perfectly happy to grant exemptions to the motorcycle helmet law
recently passed in California on exactly the same grounds. Of course,
helmets aren't an unmixed blessing. When I shattered my shoulder, my
head hit first and hardest, and the bone there is much thinner. Without
that helmet, which received only a paint chip of damage, and my head
none, you'd not be enjoying these lovely postings, 'cause I'd be dead
or a vegetable.

The same thinking that says: "your freedom to ride a motorcycle without
a helmet is less valuable, to me, than my freedom from taxes heavy
enough to provide you lifetime care in the likely event you make
yourself a vegetable" says I can judge, based on the effect on _my_
paycheck, whether or not I'm going to allow you, in the society whose
upkeep my taxes support, to take those other trips you desire so
fervently, at, likely, _my_ eventual expense.

CJ quotes Franklin on this subject, but misses that important little
word "essential"; reading skills make all the difference; Franklin
certainly knew how to write _exactly_ what he meant.

Kent, the man from xanth.
"The Birthright of humankind is the stars!"
--
Ignore the header, and don't expect me to see a news reply.  We don't get news.
Use email to: <dolan@nrlmry.navy.mil> or <dolan@192.138.87.240>
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: rdc@netcom.com (MR. COMMUNIST)
Subject: GRANDPARENTS GAME
Organization: Soviet Socialist Society, Incorp.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 02:24:27 GMT




                THE GRANDPARENTS GAME
                ---------------------

1. Gather several friends around in a circle, sitting on the floor.
2. Put a large bowl in front of each.
3. Roll the dice to determine who's turn it is, and who asks the question.
4. The person asks the person to imagine his grandparents doing some
   explicit sexual act.
5. This goes on and on, and the first person to have completely filled his
   bowl with vomit wins.


                                                ...kindda like Jeopardy


-- 

IVAN IQTOVITCH,		"WORKERS UNITE  OVER IMPERIALIST PIG"
COMMUNIST PARTY,		--IVATOLI STEPHANIVIC,
MUSMAK DEVISION			  BRAVE MARTAR
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: schnitzi@cs.ucf.edu (Mark Schnitzius)
Subject: Re: twin peaks...anyone.....anyone.....anyone......
Keywords: movie
Organization: University of Central Florida
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 02:12:55 GMT

zedaker@next08wor.wam.umd.edu (Pamela Marie Weller) writes:

>Hello,  Any Twin Peaks fans?  I recently saw the movie and also began  
>watching tapes of the series ( my friend has all of them on tape ).  I  
>love it!!!  And believe it or not I understand it completely EXCEPT:  In  
>the movie, what was the deal with Davic Bowie's character and what was the  
>deal with Cooper's image staying on the survalence screen?
>	

Rosebud is the name of his _sled_.  Kevin Costner's character is
actually a Russian spy.  And they shoot Old Yeller.

mark
From: al037@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dave Polewka)
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
Subject: DATE CALCS (mon - sun)
Date: 5 Oct 1992 01:30:56 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: al037@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dave Polewka)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc4.ins.cwru.edu


>####################################################################
>   mmddyy                       .   backwards
>             4                  .           
>   100592 = 2 x 6287            .   295001 = 7 x 17 x 37 x 67 
>             2   2              .             3
>   100692 = 2 x 3 x 2797        .   296001 = 3 x 19 x 577 
>             3                  .            
>   100792 = 2 x 43 x 293        .   297001 = 43 x 6907 
>             2                  .             
>   100892 = 2 x 11 x 2293       .   298001 = 11 x 27091 
>             7                  .                 
>   100992 = 2 x 3 x 263         .   299001 = 3 x 99667 
>             2                  .             
>   101092 = 2 x 127 x 199       .   290101 = 7 x 41443 
>             3                  .             
>   101192 = 2 x 7 x 13 x 139    .   291101 = PRIME !!
>####################################################################
-- 
=======================
"Endeavor to persevere"
=======================
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: receiving alien radio transmissions
Followup-To: talk.bizarre,comp.sys.amiga,alt.music.rush,misc.test,alt.test
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 22:18:50 GMT


as i sit here at my desk i am receving radio thought transmissions from an 
alien culture. these thoughts are telling me to dress up in a fly costume 
and walk down main street terrorizing the populace with a giant fly swatter,
but I dont think ill listen to them.

Xref: sparky talk.bizarre:33000 alt.romance.chat:19152
From: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu ("[*] Angel of Wheaties")
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre,alt.romance.chat
Subject: Re: Need help, or hugs, or something...
Date: 6 Oct 92 20:01:52 GMT
	<1992Oct2.213720.2259@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Followup-To: misc.misc
Organization: Eaters of Wisdom
In-reply-to: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU's message of 2 Oct 92 21:37:20 GMT


   In alt.romance.chat, ctv3943@rigel.tamu.edu (VICKERS, CHARLES TYLER) whines:
   >I am 19 yrs. old (ok, almost 19), a junior at Texas A&M University, and 
   >have found The Perfect Girl.

Moo.

--

                And for to se, and eek for to be seye
Mark-Jason Dominus 	  			    mjd@central.cis.upenn.edu 

Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: csuley@cs.cornell.edu (Christopher Suley)
Subject: The Printer
Summary: Amateur Writing Tip #3: Personification
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 05:44:06 GMT

She sat on the table, placidly humming.  Her name was Libel, and she
was a QMS PS-2200 laser printer.  Lately she had begun to feel very
sad.  No one was happy when they came to see her... they would just
swear and pound on her back, poke her buttons, or rudely rip out her
paper tray.  Some would even lift up her side panels, and she would
blush as her delicate inner parts were exposed.  Then they would
fumble around inside her with their amateurish hands, poking and
prodding her in all the wrong places.  She began to print a job,
scanning the pages as they went past.  More code listings.  She
sighed, then for no reason really, she bit down on the corner of a
page as it slipped out of the tray.  She felt a twinge of pleasure
as the paper crinkled up inside her in a most unusual way.  Suddenly
the door burst open, and in came a disheveled person.  She listened
to him swear in that strange analog human language.  Maybe now she
would get to see the nice man who knew how she liked to be treated.
Her side panel lights fluttered as she remembered the last time he
had been here, how he had expertly touched her, caressed her...
She was jolted out of her reverie as the man slapped her hard across
the back.  He yanked out the tray and peered into her.  Noticing the
crumpled edge of the page, he reached in and pulled it out, slamming
the tray back in when he was done.  Sadly, she warmed up and began
printing again.

Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: greg@phoenix (greg Nowak)
Subject: Re: stopping the plague
Originator: news@nimaster
Reply-To: greg@phoenix (greg Nowak)
Organization: Baguette Research Systems Inc.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 16:10:21 GMT

In article <1992Sep22.230040.26584@nmsu.edu>, sabbott@nmsu (SDA) writes:

}I registered people at a voting booth last week.

}The ones who registered republican got a 12 GHz blast from a horn
}antenna aimed at the genital area while they were signing their name.

You remind me of the old geeze at the voting booth the last time I
voted in New Jersey who was "joking" about charging people  $5 for
voting... People fought and died for the privilege of being able to go
into a polling place and register for whatever political party they
wanted.  Back when it was a burning-cross-on-the-lawn issue a lot of
them were trying to vote for a Republican named Abraham Lincoln. 

ANY fucking around with people's right to vote, no matter how
innocent-seeming and playful, is hideous. Don't sell out your values
to win the battle but lose the war.

--greg                                     greg@phoenix.princeton.edu

"Excuse me, but I created alt.sewing, and participated in the move to
rec.crafts.textiles."        --sloane@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Bob Sloane)
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Old Phrases, New Meanings
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 06:54:32 GMT


nj, cut that out....

ciao
drieux


-- 
Modern Day Problems

Does that 'answer' your question,
or should I be a little more vague.
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: schnitzi@cs.ucf.edu (Mark Schnitzius)
Subject: Re: Safety for cj
Organization: University of Central Florida
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 15:03:33 GMT

mrx@sgi.com (you: coma: marilyn monroe) writes:

>in fact, the healthful aspects of UV radiation
>are under-rated.  it's really just a PR issue.

>		mr x
>		kills germs on contact

Isn't "germs" a derogatory term for Germans?  If it's not,
it should be, and I'd like credit for inventing it.

infidel
From: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu ("[*] Angel of Threes")
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
Subject: The Temptation of Saint Anthony
Summary: yup.
Date: 2 Oct 92 16:13:21 GMT
Followup-To: misc.misc
Organization: Eaters of Wisdom


``I just thought of something cool.  You know how you can't go east from
the South Pole, right?''

``Sure.  The only direction you can go from the South pole is North.''

``That's what I always thought, but it's wrong.  You can go northeast.''

--

                And for to se, and eek for to be seye
Mark-Jason Dominus 	  			    mjd@central.cis.upenn.edu 
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: ilana@kiowa.scd.ucar.edu (Ilana)
Subject: Re: How long has it been?
Organization: NCAR/UCAR
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 17:18:06 GMT

> In <1992Oct6.134605.16183@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mneeley@nyx.cs.du.edu writes:
> 
> > How long has it been since you were kissed by a member of
> > the opposite sex?

A few hours.  There are advantages to being married which almost outweigh
the additional tax liability.

Ilana
having someone to scratch your back right in the middle where you
can't reach is probably the best.

-- 
/\     It's not denial.  I'm just very selective about the reality I accept.
  \_][ <--NCAR Ilana Stern dod#009 r.b. cliff swallow ilana@ncar.ucar.edu    
      \______________________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
From: gooley@netcom.com (Mark. Gooley)
Subject: timor mortis conturbat me
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 03:03:49 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

Clerihew is broken.

I run Mess-Dos on Clerihew.  I let the movers pack it.  It starts to
boot and then it howls through its cheap little speaker.

I feel my own mortality tonight.

Mark., maybe the movers will pay up for killing my computer
gooley@netcom.com
From: rpwhite@taurus.cs.nps.navy.mil (rpwhite)
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
Subject: If God had wanted us to vote
Date: 6 Oct 92 17:14:55 GMT
Organization: Monterey Bay Yacht Club, Monterey CA


           he would have given us candidates.
From: dan@cubmol.bio.columbia.edu (Daniel Zabetakis)
Newsgroups: talk.rape
Subject: Re: Rape and Porn, NOT Videotaping Rape
Date: 1 Oct 92 18:59:53 GMT
Organization: Columbia University, Dept. of Biological Sciences.

In article <1OCT199211171361@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov> bdsuba@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (PANDAMAN) writes:
>
>  It was an amateur video titled something like Bus Stop
>Video. The basic premise is that some guy drives around what looks like LA
>with a video camera trying to entice women at bus stops to return with him
>to his apartment to "model" for a video.

    I think this sort of thing is not very rare. There was a guy in NYC
called Ugly George, who used to go around with a camera and do the same thing.
He used to have a show on public access cable. I saw it several times.
    Ugly George seemed to be completely genuine. Many of his sessions didn't
go past toplessness, but I saw one where the girl went as far a masterbating
him. I have no doubt that it was an unpaid performance.
    I have heard mention of videos (on alt.sex.movies) that are just cheap
porn movies that try to _look_ like this sort of thing, so it doesn't
mean what you saw was genuine.

>
>
>
>She
>would verbally resist, and she was giving physical clues that she was 
>reluctant to continue (biting her lip, eyes darting around the room, eyes 
>blinking at a fast rate, and finally looking him in the eye with an 
>expression that *looked* like Do you really want me to do this?).
>Finally, he says that he wants to masturbate, but he wants her to get on 
>the floor on all fours with her rear facing him because it excites him. She 
>does. He keeps saying, "move back, closer, closer. And she does. Finally, 
>she gets close enough and he inserts his penis and they have sex doggie 
>style. However, the look on her face *seemed* to be one of confusion mixed 
>with some pain. The video then progresses as porn videos do with various 
>positions and sex acts, and then she appears to be a willing participant.
>
>If this were a real-life 
>event, not staged, then I would think that she may have a good case for 
>rape even if she didn't actually proceed with legal action.

   I'm not sure why you think this could be rape. You are reading complex
emotions from the expression of people's faces. According to your report,
she wasn't forced to do anything. If she was mentally competant, then there
really shouldn't be any issue.
   IN the end, I think what you have is a cheap porn movie made to look
like the Ugly George kind of thing. The "various positions and sex acts"
clinches it.
   Did the camera move after the sex started? In Ugly George it never did,
and it was pretty certain that he was alone with the woman.

DanZ

-- 
This article is for entertainment purposes only. Any facts, opinions,
narratives or ideas contained herein are not necessarily true, and do
not necessarily represent the views of any particular person.  
Newsgroups: talk.rape,alt.folklore.urban
From: rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla)
Subject: Re: Videotaping rapes
Organization: Rescorla for himself.
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:46:50 GMT

In article <1992Sep29.050136.7254@engage.pko.dec.com> nancyb@os2lan.enet.dec.com (nancy b.) writes:
>          >  What I want to know is if the original author will retract her
>          > statments if she can't come up with any evidence for the
>          > existance of these films?
>
>          What I want to know is if you will retract your statements if you
>          can't come up with any evidence that the films (films =
>          videotapes of real rapes circulating as porn or intended to
>          circulate) don't exist.
It is impossible to prove that things do NOT exist. All that has been done
with snuff films is to show that extensive investigation has failed to
turn up evidence for their existence.

Since the "snuff film" UL sounds so much like the "rape film" story
you have told, and you haven't presented any evidence to show that
rape films do in fact exist, my first guess is that it is simply
a variant of the "snuff film" UL. I would be open to evidence showing
that this is not true.

Come now, if these films genuinely exist, you should have no trouble
demonstrating it. For instance, proving that child pornography exists
is relatively trivial. (cf. New York v. Ferber). In any case, whether
or not it is trivial, it is you who has the burden of proof to show
that "rape films" exist, not us who have to show that they do not.
-Ekr



-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Rescorla, DoD#431 (Nighthawk S)              rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu
Former chemist now CM400 mechanic                 ekr@eitech.com(preferred)
   "Base 8 is just like base 10, really...if you're missing two fingers."
Xref: sparky talk.rape:2526 talk.religion.misc:17532
From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
Newsgroups: talk.rape,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Family Values
Keywords: the Spanish Inquisition
Date: 1 Oct 92 18:54:25 GMT
Followup-To: talk.religion.misc
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon

[follow-ups to talk.religion.misc]

In article <1992Oct1.091454.1@woods.ulowell.edu> cotera@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
#In article <1992Sep28.235517.24437@cs.ucla.edu>, coleman@rocky.cs.ucla.edu (Mike Coleman) writes:
## cotera@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
## |The Spanish Inquisition was very un-Christian.  That's not surprising since
## |the Catholic Church at the time was very un-Christian.
## 
## I disagree.  The Inquisition was condoned (at least) by the Catholic church.
## And at that time, the Catholic church *was* Christianity.

#
#I think when the inquisition took place the Reformation had already occured,
#but I may be wrong about this.  In any case the Church was still un-Christian.
#Long before the inquisition the Church had allowed pagan doctrins into the
#Church teachings.  

My little encyclopedia says that the office of Inquisition
was dissolved in 1820.  I'll leave it up to the more informed
people in t.r.m. to enlighten "cotera."

Susan
Newsgroups: talk.rape,alt.folklore.urban
From: farthing@leland.Stanford.EDU (ljf)
Subject: Re: Videotaping rapes
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 02:03:13 GMT

In article <+b_py!c.barry@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
>In article <1992Sep28.030029.6036@engage.pko.dec.com> nancyb@os2lan.enet.dec.com (nancy b.) writes:
>>re:  barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
>>> How would one show that a recorded "rape" was not an acted simulation? 
>>
>>	Simple.  Ask the woman.
>
>	Bingo. Now ask the next question: why would anyone market a
>recording of themselves committing a felony which, in combination with
>the woman's testimony, makes an open-and-shut case?
>
>	Urban legend; QED.

Linda Lovelace (I'm sorry that I can't remember her true name) says
that she was raped during the making of a porn film.  She has also
said that every sexual act she engaged in while making porn was
coerced by her husband's threat to kill her if she didn't put on a
good show.

Maybe the point is that if a porn actress claims rape, no one will
believe her regardless of how violent the rape was.

Newsgroups: talk.rape
From: farthing@leland.Stanford.EDU (ljf)
Subject: Re: Family Values
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 92 18:11:11 GMT

In article <11006@sun13.scri.fsu.edu> hawes@ds15.scri.fsu.edu (Fred Hawes) writes:
>Interesting thing I was told by my Ancient & Medieval History teacher
>some years ago (and she had no particular love for the Catholic Church):
>At the time Spain went officially Christian, there were a HUGE number of
>Muslims there.  A lot of them underwent 'conversions of convenience' to
>Catholicism, and then went to work for the Inquisition.  Apparently
>before that the Inquisition just wanted to inquire as to the orthodoxy
>of peoples' beliefs, without any real violence; the real ugly stuff
>happened after the influx of closet Muslims.

I would like to hear some documentation wrt this.  This sounds
dangerously close to saying that the Inquisition wasn't perpetuated by
Christians, but Muslims pretending to be Christians.  There's enough
Arab and Muslim bashing in the West to make me wonder if this isn't
more of it.

Newsgroups: talk.rape
From: holzman@fnalno.fnal.gov (Daniel B. Holzman)
Subject: Re: Family Values
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 21:54:04 GMT
X-Posted-From: fnalno.fnal.gov
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <1992Oct2.140540.1@woods.ulowell.edu>, cotera@woods.ulowell.edu 
writes:
> I realize I started this whole family values issue, but I think we've strayed
> from the purpose of this network.
> --Ray Cote

feel free to redirect followups to a different newsgroup.
-- 
Daniel B. Holzman                    | Eight Words the Witch's Rede Fufill:
HOLZMAN@FNAL.BITNET                  | An It Harm None, Do What You Will
HOLZMAN@FNALC.FNAL.GOV.INTERNET      |
                                     | All Acts of Love and Pleasure are
Love doesn't subtract,               | Her Rituals
   it multiplies    - Heinlein       |
                                     | Speak the Word.
Disclaimer:  Fermilab's far too large to have an opinion, let alone mine.
Newsgroups: talk.rape