HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gordon@rahul.net (Gordon Vickers)
Subject: Re: your lousy pre-sex contract
Organization: a2i network
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 02:58:27 GMT

In article <1992Dec11.224414.16708@eagercon.com> eager@eagercon.com writes:
>In article wJ@rahul.net, gordon@rahul.net (Gordon Vickers) writes:
>>    I tried getting child support (didn't need it, just thought some degree
>>  of responsibility should remain) and was treated like a jiggalow. I did
>>  not get the impression that either attorney, or even the judgette really
>>  gave a thought to what the kids may be entitled to.
>
>
>The judge may have been very aware of what the kids were entitled to.  They 
>are entitled to a reasonable level of support.  If you have custody and are
>able to support them (as you seem to indicate), the court sees no need to 
>impose your concept of responsibility on your ex-spouse.   If your ex-wife
>had significantly less income than you, then the court will look at your 
>trying to get child support as vindictive and trying to line your own pockets.
>

     I wasn't trying to be vindictive.  Just asking for some fairness.
     Let's face it, the father pays no matter what happens. The mother
   can take the kids and collect child support from the father. If the father
   becomes unemployed, she can get him later for back payments. On the
   other hand, if the mother decides she doesn't want any responsibility,
   she can leave the kids with the father and just walk away.
     How many fathers can just walk away ?  We don't get that option, only
   the mother does.
     Do you know any mothers who pay child support ?  Why must it be just
   the fathers ?
    Isn't she still a parent ?  Should her parental responsibilty stop just
   becouse the marrage did ?  The court doesn't allow the father to, but
   the mother  can.

     Let me also mention, that I was un-employed when I tried to get the
   child support.  How many un-employed mothers are denied child support ?

     The system is sexist.  The woman holds all the advantages.

     Now that I am again employed, good ol' Santa Clara County would make
  ME pay HER child support IF, she were to have the kids every other 
  week end .  Now that is SCREWY!   (No one is going to mention this to
  her right?)


-- 
Gordon Vickers <gordon@rahul.net>
Newsgroups: ba.singles,alt.personals
From: bacon@mtu.edu (Jeff Bacon)
Subject: Re: The TygerBoink Committee would like to thank you
Organization: Michigan Technological University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:01:10 GMT

In article <75588@apple.apple.COM> erc@Apple.COM (Ed Carp) writes:
>I guess I'm the only one who didn't catch a cold at the TygerBoink ... even
>though someone whose name shall go unmentioned gave me a *great* opportunity
>to catch one (but thank you for the opportunity!)... :)

slime.

>I guess I have a strong immune system, so don't be afraid to kiss me at the
>next Boink... :) :)

not me...

-bacon, 1-1/2 wks later and still recovering
From: erc@Apple.COM (Ed Carp)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: Why there might be a need for a (Pre-Sex Contract)
Date: 18 Dec 92 19:50:30 GMT
Organization: Bleeding Edge Technologies - 'Sliding Down The Razor Blade Of Life...'

In article <15993@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:

>Tyger posts an interested story about a spoiled brat...and her daughter.  I
>especially liked the part about the guy marrying his secretary.  But,  tell
>us more about your dimpled behind.

Yes, enquiring minds wanna know!
-- 
Ed Carp, N7EKG                    erc@apple.com                   801/538-0177
"This is the final task I will ever give you, and it  goes  on  forever.   Act
happy, feel happy, be happy, without a reason in the world. Then you can love,
and do what you will."           -- Dan Millman, "Way Of The Peaceful Warrior"
Newsgroups: ba.singles,soc.singles
From: bob@netcom.com (Bob Becker)
Subject: Re: Beer . . . hic!
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Distribution: ba
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 01:06:03 GMT

In article <lj24a1INNh89@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> smith@wesson.Eng.Sun.COM writes:
>
>Andreas Tovornik (dreas) will be in town soon and I wondered 

Who?

>
>Hey ladies!  Let's show these guys we're not cheap, sleazy hussies,

Not much sense in going then, is there?

>see how many of them will spring for a beer without making us pay 
>for half of it and rip up their pre-sex contracts.  Guys!  We pro-

I thought *you* were supposed to buy *us* beer?

>mise . . . no cats, no gold-diggers and don't expect a kiss on the 
>cheek.    

Where should we expect it?


Newsgroups: ba.singles,soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: Beer . . . hic!
Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
Distribution: ba
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 03:02:32 GMT

Does Fogg's allow smoking?
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

"Would you like some toast?!"
Newsgroups: ba.singles,alt.feminism,soc.singles,soc.men,soc.women
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: Oh, I forgot... (was: Re:  we can kill...)
Date: 15 Dec 92 01:57:16 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <75589@apple.apple.COM> erc@Apple.COM (Ed Carp) writes:
>In article <Dec.10.08.49.20.1992.27452@net.bio.net> charleen@net.bio.net (Charleen Bunjiovianna) writes:
|
|>>>But, Mike, that's inconceivable.
|>>
|>>	Charleen, you wouldn't by chance be Sicilian?
|
|>AT LAST!  I was beginning to think nobody got the joke.  I can die happy
|>now. 
|
|It's *amazing* how many people *haven't* seen "The Princess Bride".  I asked
|around at the Boink, and I was mightily disappointed...

I'd mentioned this before...

I have got an online copy of the complete dialog for "The Princess Bride"
for anyone that would like a copy of it.  It was my ex-girlfriends favorite 
movie.  It was so romantic, that I <sniff>, of sorry, I can't continue..
I think maybe if I put on some "Yanni" I'll cheer up a little...

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: ba.singles
From: bll@seer.gentoo.com (Brad Lanam)
Subject: Re: Really: responsibility vs role expectations
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 20:54:20 GMT
Distribution: ba
Organization: Brad Lanam  Walnut Creek, CA

In article <1992Dec11.230838.16912@eagercon.com> eager@eagercon.com writes:
>There is a demand, but the different physiology appears to make it more
>difficult to find a male contraceptive.

    I once heard of a male contraceptive that the chinese came up
with -- apparently it turned the man's eyes red.

    We know what's on his mind :-).

-- Brad

-- 
Until the next disk seek...
   -- Brad Lanam  bll@gentoo.com bll@seer.mystic.com
Newsgroups: ba.singles
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Subject: Re: Beer . . . hic!
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Distribution: ba
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 08:41:02 GMT

erc@Apple.COM (Ed Carp) writes:
>In article <1992Dec19.043439.18746@netcom.com> tyger@netcom.com (Kristen Kohlbecker) writes:
>>
>>That was a hint...yes, gerg and I will be there...;)
>
>Gerg?  Who's Gerg?  Hehehe... :)
>

gerg@netcom.com

>
>Well, this is going to be a bang-up weekend!  Gee, I'm going to have netters
>around me all weekend! :)  How fun!!  I will be glad to finally meet the
>mysterious "Greg"... :)
>

Mysterious?!?  Yeah, sure.  "I am the terror that posts in the night..."

Heh.

-- 
:::::::::::::::::::  Greg Andrews  gerg@netcom.com  :::::::::::::::::::
ObGuindon:  1923, the neatest thing!  The invention of sliced bread!
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
From: DeadHead@cup.portal.com (Bruce M Ong)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: Oh, I forgot... (was: Re:  we can kill...)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 14:11:26 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: ba
  <71837@cup.portal.com> <1992Dec17.030056.7519@netcom.com>
  <1992Dec17.193037.20711@fico.uucp>

>In article <1992Dec17.030056.7519@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) wr
i
>tes:
>>In article <71837@cup.portal.com> DeadHead@cup.portal.com (Bruce M Ong) write
s
>:
>>>	Gawd. Being a canonist snob just doesnt pay.  :-)
>>
>>	It does if your canon is big enough.
>>
>>						Kayembee :-)
>And is it BIG enough?
>
	Hmmm. I deem it terribly unbecoming to make comments about the co-
relation between canons and the visual arrangements of the canons' targets, 
so I shall refrain from saying anything (for a change) ;-)


>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
>~
>     Adryenn Ashley              |  A mind once stretched by a new idea never
>     fico!fico0!ala@apple.com    |  regains its original dimension.
>                                 |  -Oliver Wendell Holmes
>     Fair, Isaac Companies       +--------------------------------------------
-
>     120 N. Redwood Blvd         |  My opinions are my own (including the
>     San Rafael, CA  94903       |  typos), and do not reflect those of FICO.
>                                 |
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
---
/bruce
		We real cool. We
		Left school. We

		Lurk late. We
		Strike straight. We

		Sing sin. We
		Thin gin. We

		Jazz June. We
		Die soon.			- Gwendolyn Brooks
	
Newsgroups: ba.singles
From: eager@eagercon.com (Michael J. Eager)
Subject: Re: Beware of Smoke and Mirrors
Reply-To: eager@eagercon.com
Organization: Eager Consulting
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 17:43:09 GMT

In article 15457@netcom.com, desiree@netcom.com (Desiree Champagne) writes:
>In article <1992Dec11.175410.1559@fico.uucp> ala@fico.UUCP (Adryenn Ashley)
>remarks:
>>In article <1992Dec8.204001.12150@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux,
> just drieux) writes:
>
>>>I hate to tell you this, but RealWomen[tm] do NOT go to bars.
>>>Only Cheap Sleazy Hussys will be found any place that
>>>Demon Alcohol will be found!
>>
>>Not true.  Lots of real women go to bars, as long as there is 
>>something else going on beside drinking, like a band, dancing, 
>>or comedy.  So don't generalize.
>
>	Oh do get with it...  Learn how to interpret a post.
>
>	I'm a Woman and I go to bars just to imbibe in cheap, disgustingly
>sweet frothy drinks and pick up men.  Why else does one go in the first
>place?  Any other "reason" is just a beard.


Which bar, Desiree, which bar?  I have a beard.  Is that a good reason?


---
Michael J. Eager		Michael.Eager@eagercon.com
Eager Consulting		(415) 325-8077 
1960 Park Boulevard, Palo Alto, CA 94306-1141

Newsgroups: ba.singles
From: desiree@netcom.com (Desiree Champagne)
Subject: Re: Okay, what *is* that view? (was: Re: Pre-Sex Contract)
Summary: Good question...
Organization: Ray's Mom at Home
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 03:56:07 GMT

In article <2450048@hpsad.sad.hp.com> sam@hpsad.sad.hp.com (Vicky Hansen)
 writes:

>This brings up a question I have had for a long time:  Since men are 
>supposedly the ones who desire sex more than women, why is that that
>women are supposed to wear black lace undies and men feel free to wear
>the same jockey shorts they've been wearing since age 3?  Wouldn't it
>make more sense for them to dress up for the women?

	Not really.  They don't get the thrill out of seeing themselves
in the little skimpy frocks that they get out of seeing us in the little
skimpy frocks.

	But I had the same question with a man in my recent past.  He
was a hardcore "wear the high heels to bed" (which was a silly idea,
in my opinion -- do you have any idea what those spikes can do to
a goosedown comforter?) type of dude.  So the next time I decided to
dress for bed, I quietly handed him his boots, hat and a skimpy g-string
and told him that "fair was fair" after all.  He learned and thereafter
took some care to make sure that if I was dressing up to please him,
he should take some care to do the same for me -- at least he threw
out the jockeys with holes...


Desiree
From: henry@netcom.com (Henry Polard)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: Oh, I forgot... (was: Re:  we can kill...)
Date: 19 Dec 92 17:31:17 GMT
Distribution: ba
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <71973@cup.portal.com> DeadHead@cup.portal.com (Bruce M Ong) writes:
>	DONT SHOOT! I Promise I will read Danielle Steele! Judith Krantz!
>err... The Harlequins, even!
>
>	What? Madanna???
>
>	*SIGH*. alright. you can blind fold me and shoot me now...


_________________
               / \
               |-------------------------
_______________\_/     |                |
                       |       !        |
                       |                |
                       |                |
                       |     (bang)     |
                       |________________|

Oops - you weren't supposed to see that, but I was blind (as you
requested) when I folded you.

-- Henry Polard, your friendly neighborhood fraternal marxist.
Newsgroups: ba.singles
From: sheaffer@netcom.com (Robert Sheaffer)
Subject: Re: Geeze, if it were only that simple...(was: Pre-Sex Contract)
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:39:49 GMT

Look, by the time she finishes reading that damn contract, and has
pondered the implications of each of its sub-clauses and paragraphs,
and consulted with her lawyer, she *won't* be in the mood any more!

And so you won't be needing it!!!

-- 
  
        Robert Sheaffer - Scepticus Maximus - sheaffer@netcom.com
  
 Past Chairman, The Bay Area Skeptics - for whom I speak only when authorized!


     "Mystical explanations are considered deep. The truth is that
      they are not even superficial."

                   - Friedrich Nietzsche    (The Gay Science: 126)
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: Oh, I forgot... (was: Re:  we can kill...)
Date: 18 Dec 92 16:38:14 GMT
Distribution: ba
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Dec18.022422.2159@netcom.com> henry@netcom.com (Henry Polard) writes:
|In article <1992Dec17.193037.20711@fico.uucp> ala@fico.UUCP (Adryenn Ashley) writes:
|>In article <1992Dec17.030056.7519@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
|>>In article <71837@cup.portal.com> DeadHead@cup.portal.com (Bruce M Ong) writes:
|>>>	Gawd. Being a canonist snob just doesnt pay.  :-)
|>>
|>>	It does if your canon is big enough.
|
|Canonist snobs should be cannonized.
|Is there a howitzer in the house?
 
No, but I think there's an Uzi in the area.


-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: ba.singles
From: bob@netcom.com (Bob Becker)
Subject: Re: At least it provoked conversation...
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 05:13:55 GMT

In article <grismore-171292163808@130.248.208.99> grismore@adobe.com (Doug Grismore) writes:
>I've been present for a
>couple childbirths (none my own) 

Oh?  You weren't?  <grin>  Are you sure?
From: erc@Apple.COM (Ed Carp)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: Oh, I forgot... (was: Re: we can kill...)
Date: 19 Dec 92 02:41:42 GMT
Distribution: ba
Organization: Bleeding Edge Technologies - 'Sliding Down The Razor Blade Of Life...'

In article <71972@cup.portal.com> DeadHead@cup.portal.com (Bruce M Ong) writes:

>the past 3 years -- and woah.... now I am hooked... i guess the magic is
>to keep an open mind and say 'yes']

Reminds me of "Sex is not the answer.  Sex is the question.  'Yes' is the
answer."
-- 
Ed Carp, N7EKG                    erc@apple.com                   801/538-0177
"This is the final task I will ever give you, and it  goes  on  forever.   Act
happy, feel happy, be happy, without a reason in the world. Then you can love,
and do what you will."           -- Dan Millman, "Way Of The Peaceful Warrior"
Newsgroups: ba.singles
From: aldridge@netcom.com (Jacquelyn Aldridge)
Subject: Re: The TygerBoink Committee would like to thank you
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 03:28:24 GMT

erc@Apple.COM (Ed Carp) writes:

>In article <1gj84qINNmfh@male.EBay.Sun.COM> merblich@imola.EBay.Sun.COM writes:

>>>I guess I'm the only one who didn't catch a cold at the TygerBoink 

>>Well that makes two of us.  Maybe we are doing something right or should it be WRONG?

>Well, I kissed all the appropriate females -- I think.  Or were there some I
>missed?  Oh, yes, I did!  Libby, for one, and that redheaded physics female
>(I've forgotten her name, unfortunately).  I'll get 'em next time, I guess --
>*Then* maybe I'll get what I deserve.  <wink>
>-- 
>Ed Carp, N7EKG                    erc@apple.com                   801/538-0177

	You forgot to kiss me? Well if I'd known you were giving them out 
I would have taken one. 

The redheaded physics female
--Jackie--

From: sam@hpsad.sad.hp.com (Vicky Hansen)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:31:13 GMT
Subject: Re: You Stand corrected
Organization: HP Signal Analysis Division - Rohnert Park, CA
Newsgroups: ba.singles

stcroix@Cadence.COM (Bill St.Croix) writes:
    ]
    ] Shouldn't that be "a maximum of 18 years"??  Last I knew (correct me if
    ] I'm wrong), child support was to be paid until the age of majority, until
    ] the child in question gets married (but not past the age of majority) or
    ] the child is adopted by a "step-parent."

You are making some assumptions here that may not be valid.
If the child goes on to college, the parents may split the costs.
Some children never get beyond the stage of an infant and need care forever so
the 'age of majority' does not really apply to them.
From: janiceg@marvin.Eng.Sun.COM (Janice Gelb)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: Okay, what *is* that view? (was: Re: Pr
Date: 17 Dec 92 18:01:55 GMT
Reply-To: janiceg@marvin.Eng.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin

In article 2450048@hpsad.sad.hp.com, sam@hpsad.sad.hp.com (Vicky Hansen) writes:
# In ba.singles, desiree@netcom.com (Desiree Champagne) writes:
#
#  # I know from my own experience (and again, experience
#  # of many of my friends) that if I had my druthers, I'd probably not
#  # think of putting on a garterbelt and stockings or wearing high heels
#  # to bed -- I've done it (and will continue to do so) to keep my partner
#  # sexually pleased. 
#
# This brings up a question I have had for a long time:  Since men are 
# supposedly the ones who desire sex more than women, why is that that
# women are supposed to wear black lace undies and men feel free to wear
# the same jockey shorts they've been wearing since age 3?  Wouldn't it
# make more sense for them to dress up for the women?


Reminds me of my favorite one of those otherwise obnoxious "Why Ask Why?"
commercials: "If love is blind, why is there lingerie?"


********************************************************************************
Janice Gelb                  | (415) 336-7075     
janiceg@marvin.eng.sun.com   | "A silly message but mine own" (not Sun's!) 
********************************************************************************
From: DeadHead@cup.portal.com (Bruce M Ong)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: Oh, I forgot... (was: Re:  we can kill...)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 15:51:31 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: ba
  <Dec.10.08.49.20.1992.27452@net.bio.net> <75589@apple.apple.COM>
  <1992Dec15.004401.16970@netcom.com>

>In article <75589@apple.apple.COM> erc@Apple.COM (Ed Carp) writes:
>>
>>It's *amazing* how many people *haven't* seen "The Princess Bride".  I asked
>>around at the Boink, and I was mightily disappointed...
>
><sneer>  Another illiterate.
>
>
	Oh well. Havent read the book, nor seen the movie. Guess that makes me
a "disappointing illiterate."

	Gawd. Being a canonist snob just doesnt pay.  :-)
>
>-- 
>                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
>                             @netcom.com 
>
>Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
>
>"Would you like some toast?!"
-----
/bruce

So is anybody else here looking forward to seeing "Tous les matins du monde"
and "The crying game" ?
From: Jawara@Applelink.Apple.COM (Ron Drake)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: Pre-Sex Contract
Date: 14 Dec 92 22:04:02 GMT
Followup-To: ba.singles
Organization: Me, The Whole Me and Nothing But

I was under the impression that people expand rather than contract before
sex. Have I been misiniformed? ;-)

*************************************************************************
"While the music played, you worked by candelight. Those San Francisco
nights! You were the best in town. Just by chance, you crossed a diamond
with a pearl. You turned it on the world. That's when you turned the
world aroundI"
--Kid Charlemagne (Becker/Fagen)
*************************************************************************
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: Beer . . . hic!
Date: 18 Dec 92 16:46:31 GMT
Distribution: ba
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <75711@apple.apple.COM> erc@Apple.COM (Ed Carp) writes:
>In article <lj24a1INNh89@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> smith@wesson.Eng.Sun.COM writes:
 
|>Send me email before the end of the day Friday if you plan to be 
|>there or just show up Saturday 6:00 p.m. onwards.  I'll be the one 
|>holding up the bar or kicking John Fereira's butt at (with?) darts.
|
|I'm tempted to make it down to this one -- who else is coming??

Like Nina said, I'll be there.  


-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
+==========================================================================+
From: DeadHead@cup.portal.com (Bruce M Ong)
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: We can kill that thread for you, wholesale
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 23:28:04 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: ba

>> 	If I am misinterpreting the question then I apologize before hand,
>> but that question sounds a bit accusatorial.
>
>Isn't it interesting how a thread will invariably ravel context?
>
>For example, who can place that line in its indigenous habitat?
>
>This is what happened to the Mayans and their gloomy codices...
>

	Oh well. That tells me I should never post a msg on usenet
when I wake up in the morning with that "Oh... no so fresh" feeling...
>
>
>=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
>tcbowden@clovis.felton.ca.us - 
>+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
---
/bruce	"ANY day is a good day to slack!"
From: diana@wetware.com (CatWoman )
Newsgroups: ba.singles
Subject: Re: A cup of wisdom
Date: 14 Dec 92 14:00:28 GMT
Distribution: ba
Organization: Castle WetWare MouseCatcher

aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:

] HF.HLA@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lisa A. Haupt) writes:
] (Actually, it's Drieux; Lisa doesn't know how to reply properly)
] >> Lisa Haupt
] >Just Because you are still in the Denial Phase of
] >all of this, does NOT mean that you need to broadcast
] >it to the net.....
] >>>Geez, it's no wonder you are single!
] 
] I'm sure the OriginalProblemOlderWoman would be amused to hear that she
] and Drieux are no long together.

Gee - I wonder who that IS in my bed...

Technically, of course - she IS correct -
since both our divorces are final now.
That's how we get away with posting here,
right???

Diana
Newsgroups: ba.singles