HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: paladin@leland.Stanford.EDU (Jason Gische)
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 18:44:16 GMT

In article <1dp6lfINNhtk@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K) writes:
>It's hard to already label any player from the 1991 draft a bust
>already (O, so Huey Richardson IS a bust!).  But, below is the first
>round of that draft.  Do you see anybody there that has played significantly
>better than Maryland over the past 1 1/2 season?
>
>1991 First Round
>1, Dallas (from New England), Russell Maryland, dt, Miami.
>2, Cleveland, Eric Turner, s, UCLA.
>3, Atlanta, Bruce Pickens, cb, Nebraska.
>4, Denver, Mike Croel, lb, Nebraska.
	Definitely the best player taken in this draft.
>5, LA Rams, Todd Lyght, cb, Notre Dame,
>6, Phoenix, Eric Swann, dt, no college.
>7, Tampa Bay, Charles McRae, t, Tennessee.
	Playing a studly OT for the Bucs.
>8, NY Jets, used pick in 1990 supplemental draft for Rob Moore, wr, Syracuse.
>9, Philadelphia (from Green Bay), Antone Davis, t, Tennessee.
>10, San Diego, Stanley Richard, s, Texas.
>11, Detroit, Herman Moore, wr, Virginia.
	Starting wideout, getting better.
>12, New England (from Minnesota through Dallas), Pat Harlow, t, Southern Cal.
>13, Dallas, Alvin Harper, wr, Tennessee.
>14, Atlanta (from Indianapolis), Mike Pritchard, wr, Colorado.
	Why did he go so low?  He's managing to shine on a team with Rison and
	Haynes already as receivers.
>15, New England (from New Orleans through Dallas), Leonard Russell, rb, Arizona State.
>16, Pittsburgh, Huey Richardson, de, Florida.
>17, Seattle, Dan McGwire, qb, San Diego State.
>18, Washington (from Houston through New England and Dallas), Bobby Wilson, dt, Michigan State.
>19, Cincinnati, Alfred Williams, lb, Colorado.
	Among the AFC leaders in sacks.
>20, Green Bay (from Philadelphia), Vinnie Clark, cb, Ohio State.
>21, Dallas (from Washington), Kelvin Pritchett, dt, Mississippi.
>22, Kansas City, Harvey Williams, rb, Louisiana State.
>23, Chicago, Stan Thomas, t, Texas.
>24, Miami, Randall Hill, wr, Miami.
	Terrific deep threat for Phoenix (although the pick they traded became
	Troy Vincent.)
>25, LA Raiders, Todd Marinovich, qb, Southern Cal.
>26, San Francisco, Ted Washington, dt, Louisville.
>27, Buffalo, Henry Jones, cb, Illinois.
>28, NY Giants, Jarrod Bunch, fb, Michigan.
>
>
>
>
>Ray      GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't think I'd call Maryland a bust.
But I don't think he was worth trading up for in this weak draft.
I don't think (and didn't think) that Ismail was worth it either.
Jason Gische
From: am112@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Lee Stonum)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Football Poll
Date: 12 Nov 1992 00:35:03 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: am112@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Lee Stonum)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu


Here's a poll. Just for fun. Fill out and e-mail back to me.

All- Stars
QB
QB
RB
RB
RB
WR
WR
WR
TE
OL
OL
OL
OL
OL

DL
DL
DL
DL
LB
LB
LB
LB
LB
CB
CB
S
S


Rookie (of the year)
1
2
3

College (Heisman)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

MVP
1
2
3

Coach (of the year)
1
2
3
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: NFL_1992 Scoreboard: Predict/track NFL scores
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Date: 10 Nov 92 02:38:10 MST
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

If any of you are interested in a football-pool-type program that runs on a
PC under MS Windows, I suggest trying a program at wuarchive.wustl.edu
called NFL_1992 Scoreboard.  It's in the directory /mirrors/win3/misc
under the filename nfl92.zip.  It was written by a man named Thomas Kerr,
and he's marketing it as shareware.

For practice, I entered the first 10 weeks of NFL scores (also at wuarchive,
thanks Gidi).  I then produced a couple of reports, which I'll post in
subsequent messages.  The program apparently uses 1991 results (playoffs
included) and 1992 game data to predict scores and assign "power" ratings.
You be the judge.
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Subject: Re: Randall benched for WEEK TEN
Organization: Houses of the Holy
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 17:04:24 GMT

> I'm in a fowl mood!!!


I know this really great place in Chicago Downtown...



-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: keithg@boi.hp.com (Keith Glasson)
Subject: Re: Bills vs. Steelers Observations
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 06:06:29 GMT
Organization: work
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

Imran Qureshi (iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu) wrote:
: The Bills looked good on the offensive side of the ball by rolling up 488
: yards of offense.  They would have scored 35 if they hadn't run out the
: clock.  They're just a class team.
: 


	I'm not a Bills-basher, but Buffalo is not a class team. A good
	team, yes, but not a class team.


	-keith
From: v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Miami Dolphins 6-1
Date: 6 Nov 92 04:33:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <t_trunc.8@chips.bash.edu>, t_trunc@chips.bash.edu (Tursiops Truncatus) writes...
>In article <92306.194257JMC162@psuvm.psu.edu> JMC162@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
> 
>>A wake up call.  The Dolphins need a blow horn to wake them up!  I'm counting d
>>own the day to the rematch.  Prediction Buffalo: 31 Fish: 14.
> 
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!  The "Fish n' Chips Bowl"  I LOVE IT!!
> 
>But you've gotten the score wrong, child!  Roby's back, Bobby Harden is 
>back, Offerdahl and Jackson are going to be healthy and Kelly ain't!
> 
>No Mercy on the Chips!!
> 
>Miami - 42 
>Chips - 3
> 
>TT
>Tursiops Truncatus 
>*************************************************************************
>GREAT MOMENTS IN BUFFALO HISTORY:  Thurmon Thomas loses his helmet during 
>the opening series of SuperBowl XXVI

Ok, I have just one question:  whose hack is this?

C'mon, fess up now...
From: reams@crchh462.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Cary Reams)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Lions Stats Wk 10 (THESE ARE STATS??)
Date: 10 Nov 92 16:57:28 GMT
Reply-To: reams@bnr.ca
Organization: NT/BNR

In article <92315.094644343VTQ2@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU>, William Grant <343VTQ2@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU> writes:
|> Here's the Lion's stats for Week #10 vs. Dallas
|> 
|> Next Opponent:
|> In Pittsburgh
|> 
|> Game Summery
|>                        Dallas            Detroit*
|> Pts                     37                 3
|> Rushing                 37/158             22/124
|> Pass-Att                18/27              9/17
|> Pass-yds                398                201
^^^^^^^^^^^^^These are total yards
   Passing                 240                90
|> Fum lost                1/1                2/1
|> Pos                     37:57              22:03
|> 
|> Passing:
|> Pete   6/10/69 II
|> Kramer 3/7/21  I
|> 
|> Rushing:
|> Sanders  18/108
|> Pete      2/9
|> Kramer    1/6
|> Stradford 1/1
|> 
|> Receiving:
|> Moore    4/57
|> Farr     2/14
|> Campbell 1/10
|> Perriman 1/6
|> Sanders  1/3
|> 
|> Kicking:
|> Hanson   1FG (36)
|> 
|> Sacks:
|> none
|> 
|> Interceptions:
|>  1- Blades or White (can't remember which,  and paper doesn't say!!)
Melvin Jenkins, 1 INT, returned for 14 yards.

|> 
|> Injuries:
|> Pete mild concussion in 3rd quarter
|> 
|> Game Summery:
|>    Ok,  so it was only a 17 point lead at the half,  but the end
|> result was the same.  Dallas in a blowout.  It's the worst pasting
|> of the lion's in a long time.   Sanders looked good,  but line
|> was terrible.  QUARTERBACK CONTROVERSEY APPROACHING!!!!!
|> 
|> News Items:
|> 
|>   Kramer has been getting more and more playing time each week,
|> and may be slotted for a start next week after Pete's concussion.
|>   Don't expect Detroit to rebound after this loss,  Pittsburgh
|> was edged out by Buffalo,  and will be looking to get back on
|> the winning track.  Lion's play is cold enough without having to
|> play in Pittsburgh.
|> 

-- 
Cary W Reams | sneakers.ksh <"cary w. reams"
NT/BNR/MTXVO | TOO MANY SECRETS:> wry as a merc.   
---------------------------------------------------------------
My opinions are not necessarily shared by Northern Telecom/BNR. 
---------------------------------------------------------------
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Emmitt passes Herschel
Date: 5 Nov 92 23:23:37 GMT
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

An interesting tidbit for Cowboy fans -- not only did Emmitt play much
better than Herschel in last Sunday's game, he gained enough yardage to
pass Herschel on the Cowboy's all-time rushing list.  Herschel had 3,388
yards with the Cowboys, and Emmitt now has 3,396.  I think that puts him
about fourth or fifth on the list, but I'm not absolutely certain.

Daniel Welch
----
Two men say they're Jesus -- one of 'em must be wrong!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bubba@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Gary Beason)
Subject: Re: Cities chosen for Super Bowl sites?
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 00:15:45 GMT

I heard that Texas Stadium would never be chosen as a site because its
temp. average in Jan-Feb was something like 6 degrees below what the
NFL wants--is this true?


-- 

Gary Beason    			      
Purdue University
bubba@mace.cc.purdue.edu
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Date: 11 Nov 1992 20:47:56 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Howard Hughes Medical Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <1992Nov11.184416.9585@leland.Stanford.EDU> paladin@leland.Stanford.EDU (Jason Gische) writes:
>
>I don't think I'd call Maryland a bust.
>But I don't think he was worth trading up for in this weak draft.
>I don't think (and didn't think) that Ismail was worth it either.

To continue on this subject......
Remember that Jimmy Johnson had a friend in New England in
Sam Jankovich, with whom he made the deal.  Jankovich let
it be known to Johnson that Atlanta was interested in The
Rocket, but only if they could definitely sign him (he was
asking for $3M a year).  Johnson and Jerry Jones figured that
if they traded for the pick (and it came very cheap to them),
they could do the negotiations with the Rocket's agent, sign
him, and then trade him to Atlanta.  Dallas had first round
picks #11, #12, and #14.  They traded #11 (and some lower
stuff, including players) to NE for #1, giving them #1, #12,
and #14 in the first round.  Now, Atlanta had picks #3 and #13.
If they wanted a signed Rocket, they'd give up at least those
picks.  Therefore, the Falcons would get their Rocket, the
Patriots would have the 11th pick in the first round, and some
needed players from Dallas for depth, and the Cowboys would
have first round picks #3, #12, #13, and #14.  Jones and Johnson
figured that, at worst, The Rocket goes to Canada, and they'd
be free to negotiate with other players (something forbidden by
Tagliabue, unless you have the #1 pick) and select the one player
they really wanted, Maryland.  If the deal with Atlanta had gone
through, the Cowboys were praying that Maryland would still be
there at #3.  Jimmy Johnson said in a way he was glad the Rocket
went north and they kept the #1 pick, because that's how much they
wanted Maryland, they didn't want to risk him not being there at #3.

So, if you look at it from the standpoint of what they gave up by
trading up, what the potential reward was in swinging the deal with
Atlanta, and how much they wanted Maryland, it was worth it.


Ray    GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: alvstad@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Joel D Alvstad)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: A TOTAL DRUBBING..
Date: 5 Nov 92 22:17:39 GMT
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN

In article <1992Nov3.194602.25202@newsgate.sps.mot.com> saari@chdasic.sps.mot.com writes:
>> 
>> Last week the D abused Mark Ripyen at will and this week
>> it was Harbough's turn.
>
>Wait a minute... didn't the Redskins win that game?
>
Yes, the Skins won, but Rypien was popped every time he dropped back.  And I 
don't just mean it was frequent pops, buck it literally was EVERY time he went
back to pass it.  The Vikes D does look like the good times are back, but if
they get injured like previous seasons, they don't have much experienced depth.

Offensively, the Vikes running looked good against the Bears; passing was again
inconsistent, but that's what playing with a 30+ mph wind in your face for two
quarters will do to you.  Personally, I can see them shredding the Bucs this
weekend, and going quite a long way.  Dec. 6 at Philly already has me pumped...

Joel Alvstad
Purple and gold flows through my veins.
Organization: Senior, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 23:07:14 -0500 
From: "Scott F. Phillips" <sp39+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Let's Go Eagles!
 

The Eagles are my favorite team, and I really hope they get it together
in time for the Super Bowl.  I am from Connecticut and I'm curious as to
who else out there (not from the Philadelphia area) likes the Eagles.
And now, my weekly commentary (the first of too many):

I think the Eagles looked very good against the Raiders, although you
knew it was coming -- The Raiders were 3-6 going in and the birds had
lost 2 straight divisional games (separated by a less than impressive
7-3 squeaker over the underrated Phoenix Cardinals).  You knew they'd
come out and make something happen. Of course, we can always count on
our defense for that!!

I liked Jimmy Mac's performance on Sunday, but I think Kotite's decision
to go back to Cunningham was perfect.  He is the Eagle's starter - He
can win games for them when he finally gets comfortable (which I believe
will happen vs. Green Bay).

Speaking of the Green Bay game (not on TV here in Pittsburgh where I go
to school - shit -- I guess it's back to Silky's (a bar here in
Pittsburgh with a satellite dish)) I think we'll see a big effort by the
defense coupled with a promising effort by Randall in the Eagles 30-13
victory. Vai Sikahema will return the Packers 3-0 kickoff after a Chris
Jacke field goal for an Eagle touchdown to make it 7-3 Birds.

See ya!
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Worst/Best Trades
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:57:25 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


Hi,

New thread. Cool!

Okay I'll exclude my favorite team (GIANTS) from this thread because then I'll
never stop.  From what I remember, here are some of the best and worst trades,
in my opinion:

BEST:

Jim Lachey to the Skins for Jay Schroeder.

Packers getting the Majik man as a 9th (?) round pick and then his really 
great season following.

The Bills getting Cornelius Benett in a 3 way trade involving Dickerson and
Greg Bell.

Green Bay's aquisition of upa nd coming rookie Brett Favre (GB seems to know
how to pick the QBs).

The Cowboys getting Steve Beuerlein from the Raiders (I won't even bring up
the Walker fiasco).

The Eagles getting Reggie White in the supplemental draft after other teams
(like the GIANTS) passed him up.  Imagine the possibilities if LT and Reggie
lined up on the same defense?

WORST:

Eagles giving up 2 first round picks to get the greatest dud of modern day
draft: Antoine Davis (Greg Townsend used him as a revolving door in Sunday's
game).

Jets drafting Blair Thomas (2nd pick overall) over Emmitt Smith (hah!). Thomas
is all right but Emmitt is "king stud #1".

The Cowboys (in spite of all their great trades) picking Russell Maryland as
the first choice overall in 1990.


satish nair
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Planet X
Subject: Re: Cowboy Bandwagon
Organization: Neputune U.
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:04:13 GMT

Hi, I have been a Cowboys fan for 1034 years.  I lived
on the planet Neptune where they devour Cowboy fans
for dinner, so you know how much of a fan I have been
to live through such hostility and wear my Cowboy cap
and Cowboy jacket and wave my Cowboy flag and bounce on my
knee my inflatable Cowboy Cheerleader doll.  I had to go
through a lot hiding in caves and sleeping in mailboxes to
evade detection, but now that they're finally winning again,
I feel that it is safe to come out and voice my objective
and intelligent opinions...


COWBOYS RUUUUULLLLLLEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!
EVERYBODY ELSE SUCKS!!!!!
TEAM OF THE NEXT CENTURY, MAN!!!!!!
WOOF WOOF WOOF!!!!!!!!!

Deep down inside of your Cowboy hearts, and
Cowboy minds, you're ALL thinking that.

   O O
  \___/
From: caeser@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Robert Michael Trotter)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Terry Allen
Date: 10 Nov 1992 17:19:21 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Nov10.163517.2566@asl.dl.nec.com> nix@aslslc43.asl.dl.nec.com (David Nix) writes:
>How does Green plan to use Terry Allen the rest of the season.  I know that
>earlier this season he and Craig were splitting series 60-40, but that seems
>to have changed.  Allen seems to still be getting the lion's share of the 
>carries, but Craig is getting the scores.  What's up in Viking land?

	Well, in the games I have seen, usally Allen gets the ball between
	the 20's and Green sometimes pulls Allen when the Vikes get to the
	goal line, but Allen does have something like 7 TD's. Its pretty
	strange tho, even when Allen is having a great game, Craig is 
	always in there. I wonder, but I dont have alot of info here in
	Wisconsin....

	Mark
	GO VIKINGS!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Week 9 & cumulative passer ratings
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 00:34:12 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.185036.29782@sj.ate.slb.com> desilets@sj.ate.slb.com (Mark Desilets) writes:
>>Cumulative through week 9 (minimum  90 attempts):
>>Pos Name              Atts  Comp   Cmp%  Yards  AvgGn  TDs TD %  INT  IN% RATE
>>--- ----------------  ----  ----  -----  -----  -----  --- ----  --- ---- -----
>> 21 Stan Humphries     227   134   59.0   1673   7.37    7  3.1   12  5.3  70.2
>> 22 Mark Rypien        231   126   54.5   1603   6.94    6  2.6    9  3.9  68.9
>	Ouch!

Well, Mark, given the choice of getting rid of either Rypien or Humphries in
1991, who would you trade away?

I don't think Humphries is a better QB. At least Rypien got two pro-bowl 
seasons and a Super bowl season. Humphries is still unproven.

In other words, given the Hogs, the National Defense and the Posse, I don't 
see how interception-prone Humphries could lead the team to a championship
in 1991.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
From: t_trunc@chips.bash.edu (Tursiops Truncatus)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Roby Is BACK!!!
Keywords: Dolphins
Date: 5 Nov 92 23:00:34 GMT
Organization: Buffalo Chips Pathology, Inc.

The MIGHTY MIAMI DOLPHINS announced yesterday that one of the best punters 
in the game was back in the lineup and ready for action!

Reggie Roby came off of injured reserve yesterday and Joe Prokop was put on 
waivers by the Dolphins.  Figure that that means that the punting game is 
now good for an extra 10 yards per kick.

Also, the Dolphins' announced that safety Bobby Harden, who had 2 
interceptions last year, even though he only started 5 games, is also back 
in the lineup!!!  

Watch out world!  The DOLPHINS are going to be even better than ever!!!

TT
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: schw_mi@pts.mot.com (Michael Schwarz)
Subject: Broncos kick but on Jets, Giants next
Reply-To: schw_mi@pts.mot.com
Organization: Paging and Wireless Data Group
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 18:20:06 GMT

Well, well my Broncos are starting to get on track for the year.  Kicked the Jets
butts pretty good.  Giants are up next, without LT, this will out to be revenge city.
John's back to calling his own plays.  (Reeves finally realized his booth couldn't) `
Too bad for Dallas they have to play the Broncos now instead of earlier in the 
season.  The Broncos should go 13-3 for the year, and does this weary Broncos fan
guess another possible Super Bowl appearance, absolutely, and final a victory!!!

---
Michael A. Schwarz
A missed place Bronco Fan in Dolphin Country.
Go Broncos
From: v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Bills Run Defense
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:52:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

I saw a post stating that the Bills offense is the reason that teams
have not had a 100 yard runner.  This is incorrect, partially.
Football is a game of running not passing.  The teams that can run
(which the Bills can, second in rushing this year I think) are
successful.  Look at the Atlanta falcons, they have a poor rushing
game.  When you can run, it opens up the passing game.  The RUN-AND-
SHOOT offense works the other way.  They use the pass to set up the
run (i.e. 5 to 6 defensive backs is good to run against.  But back
to the main topic.  The Bills have never just run the score on a 
team, so that the other team had to pass on every down.  Last year
the BIlls 27 in the league in rusing defense, this year 2 in league
in rushing defense.  The reason is they have a healthy Bruce Smith,
Jeff Wright, and a new starting left end in Phil Hansen (who is
10 times better than 1 sack a season Seals).  You have to be able
to run the ball in the NFL, if you don't you won't get to the Super
Bowl.  Running the ball takes time off the clock faster than passing.

Bruce, a Bills fan.
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Upcoming Draft
Date: 11 Nov 92 20:49:58 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

Hi,

I thought I'd start a new thread:  here are some players I see going in the
first round of the upsoming draft (provided there is a draft) and the teams
that may take them:

1- Drew Bledsoe (Wash St.) Tampa Bay needs a QB real bad! Wyche has shown a
	great amount of interest in him.
2- Garrison Hearst (Georgia) The Falcons need him, they should take him so
	Monday's game doesn't happen next season.
3- Lincoln Kennedy (U of Wash) Jets sure could use him on what I see as one of
	their weakest points: the O line.
4- Dimitrius Debose (Notre Dame) Oh please Oh please let the GIANTS get him!!
5- Rick Mirer (Notre Dame) Can't see any other losing team needing a QB.
	He'd certainly would be welcome on the Saints but Heberts doing 
	well for himself.


Anyone else think of others??

satish nair
go giants