HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: prim!dave@germany.eu.net (Dave Griffiths)
Subject: Re: Chrysler order for NS486?
Organization: Primitive Software Ltd.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 05:46:24 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.163154.2876@leland.Stanford.EDU> spagiola@frinext.stanford.edu writes:
>
>From yesterday's SF Chronicle, in the Technology column by Ken  
>Siegmann:
>
>Next (sic) computer close to a deal with Chrysler
>
>Steve Jobs' Next Computer Inc is close to a major deal to supply its  
>latest software to Chrysler Corp.
>
>Sources close to the Redwood City-based computer company say the no.3  
>automaker will buy 3,000 copies of NextStep 486. 
>

Wow! Great news, hope it comes off. Looks as though NS486 is going to
be _very_ significant for NeXT.

Dave Griffiths
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: jmd@cube.handheld.com (Jim De Arras)
Subject: Re: Avoid RightBrain for RTF ? (Who the heck are you people?)
Organization: Hand Held Products, Inc.
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 15:40:40 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.183559.7187@cs.yale.edu> nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu  
(Nathan F. Janette) writes:
> 
> I suggest that you spend some time paying for a connection, and/or
> working on a SLIP line reading this group before you criticize what
> you obviously don't understand.
> 
You don't have to 'experence' pay-per-byte to understand it.  I resent being  
told I MUST cater to those who cannot (or will not) `afford' a better  
connection.  I don't mind a degree of compromise, but what is generally pushed  
(demanded?) is totally for the pay-per-byters benefit.  Usenet traffic at my  
site has increased from 20 mb a day last June to frequently over 50 mb per day  
now.  The trend is going to continue.  Those of you with small pipes better  
start looking at enlarging them.

> --
> Nathan Janette		"I'm a NeXTstep man,
> Dept MB&B, Yale Univ	 I'm a NeXTcube guy"
> New Haven, CT
> nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (NeXT)

Jim
From: nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (Nathan F. Janette)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
Subject: Re: RightBrain Software File Server: up and running
Date: 15 Sep 92 16:25:41 GMT
Reply-To: nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu
Organization: Yale University, Department of Computer Science, New Haven, CT

In article <1992Sep15.134854.5932@cube.handheld.com> jmd@cube.handheld.com (Jim  
De Arras) writes:
> In article <1992Sep14.161850.26684@cs.yale.edu>  
nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu  
> (Nathan F. Janette) writes:
> > You don't think the people who *pay* Glenn and others to
> > develop those contributions by purchasing the
> > software have a right - no - an obligation to use the tools
> > available to consumers to give strong negative feedback
> > to a company?  Tough luck, because I (and others) do! 
> > 
> So, usenet is a "tool" for consumer feedback to vendors, but not the 
> other 'way around?  What a twisted world!

No, it's a medium for communicating and organizing
people who may be consumer's, though. You know, exactly
the kind of thing you (and other businesses) are often
fighting so hard to stop whenever you can: consumer
education.  

--
Nathan Janette		"I'm a NeXTstep man,
Dept MB&B, Yale Univ	 I'm a NeXTcube guy"
New Haven, CT
nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (NeXT)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: jeffo@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)
Subject: Re: right brain?
Reply-To: jeffo@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 21:48:46 GMT

ede978e@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Robert D. Nicholson) writes:
>As Glenn has said what is the point of bashing this even further?

As this is the advocacy group, perhaps you should reconsider the
charter for this group.
-- 
-- Jeff (jeffo@uiuc.edu)
-- No NeXTmail please
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: nevin@dtint.dtint.com
Subject: RightBrain
Reply-To: nevin@dtint.dtint.com
Organization: Digital Technology, International
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 92 21:37:47 GMT

I just wanted to add my .02 worth to the current flurry of RightBrain  
comments...

First, I have spent over $25,000.00 of my own money on NeXT hardware and  
software.  I have a dual-headed Dimensioned cube, 64MB (CPU) + 20MB (ND)  
memory, big drive, optical, color scanner, two modems (high-speed data + fax),  
printer, etc.  That's a very large chunk of money, and I view it as an  
INVESTMENT, since I now make my living with it (and for once I'm really  
enjoying my job-- I love the machine).

Second, history has indeed proven that the best technology does not always win  
the race.  In light of my own personal investment, this scares the h*ll out of  
me.  I am NOT a rich person, and I don't want to see my investment turn to NOT.

Third, Glenn Reid is a talented individual, as is Jack Reynolds.  And, they are  
PRO-NeXT.  They are doing everything they know how to do to try and make the  
machine a success-- i.e., protect my investment.

I may and may not agree with someone over some little points of marketing,  
advertising, etc., and may or may not agree with the finer points of their  
strategy for supporting the NeXT, but....

Any talented individual who is pro-NeXT gets a double thumbs-up in my book.   
This applies to Glenn, Jack, and anyone else out in net-land that is pro-NeXT.   
And, if you develop quality products, and I have a need for them, I WILL buy  
them.

All the pro-NeXT people-- double thumbs up!
All the nuetral-NeXT people, your OK-- but need enlightening.
All the anti-NeXT people out there can go eat rocks.


--
NeXTmail preferred!
-- 
---
root	                               root@dtint.dtint.com
Digital Technology Int.                (801)226-2984	
500 W. 1200 South, Orem UT, 84057      FAX (801) 226-8438
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: todd@liveware.com
Subject: Re: NeXT sighting on NBC!
Keywords: Machine Use to promote Bozo From Space
Reply-To: todd@liveware.com
Organization: Liveware Corporation   Fort Collins, CO.  USA.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 19:11:20 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.150001.4911@cs.yale.edu> nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu  
(Nathan F. Janette) writes:
> My wife claims that during this morning's NBC Today show
> the female host (I've lost track of her name) asked Briant
> Gumbal (sp?) a question while he was off-camera, and as

Gawd, I hope that bozo wasn't using a NeXT.  What a bummer
to have such an ego maniac, butthead using a NeXT!!! ;')
By the way, I spell class 1 a-hole, Bryant GUM-BALL.

> the camera picked him up for his responce, he was tapping
> away at a NeXTstation! 
> 
> --
> Nathan Janette                "I'm a NeXTstep man,
> Dept MB&B, Yale Univ   I'm a NeXTcube guy"
> New Haven, CT
> nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu (NeXT)

Todd
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: jmd@cube.handheld.com (Jim De Arras)
Subject: Re: Next vs Macintosh for the Graphic Professional (rtf)
Organization: Hand Held Products, Inc.
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 00:45:07 GMT

In article <BtyMAM.81G@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)  
writes:
> Christophe Janot writes
> > When will RightBrain stop filling the netnews with their
> > advertising or marketing posts ? 
> 
> When people stop buying their products.  Perhaps when RightBrain employees  
> realize that RTF is rarely, if ever, necessary for such wide distribution  
> as USENET news.
> 
> Yes, that's right, it's not enough to just label posts as RTF when you  
> should also know when RTF is necessary.
> --
> -- Jeff (jeffo@uiuc.edu)
> -- no NeXTmail please

Why have a NeXT if you want to restrict yourself to '70s UNIX features.  I  
don't want to see excessive use of RTF postings at least until the backbones  
are sped up, but NeXT users that have "no NeXTmail please" in their .sig puzzle  
me.  But the occasional one, such as RightBrain's recent posting, is a breath  
of fresh air in an otherwise 7 bit ascii world.

Jeff, this is not directed to you, or I would've e-mailed it.  Nor is it really  
to anyone else, since history has proven no one will change their mind on this  
topic once its been made up.

I guess I just have a need to vent my feelings on RTF, GUI, NeXTs, etc every  
now and again!

And yes, I know some of you pay-per-byte, don't bother reminding me.  You made  
your decision, I made mine.

Jim
From: jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
Subject: Avoid RightBrain (was: Re: PasteUp vs PageMaker vs Quark...)
Date: 5 Sep 92 05:29:19 GMT
Reply-To: jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

Jack Reynolds writes
[a bunch of RTF advertisement crap]

Can't you folks at RightBrain, or at least Jack Reynolds, get it through  
your collective thick heads that advertisements are not welcome?

Yes, it is true, that although you did label it as RTF, you didn't label  
it as an advertisement (which USENET rules ask you to do).  Ever consider  
that people might *NOT* enjoy paying to read advertisements?
-- 
-- Jeff (jeffo@uiuc.edu)
-- no NeXTmail please
From: unregistered@newcastle.ac.uk (Scott A. McIntyre)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
Subject: Re: right brain?
Date: 10 Sep 92 12:03:04 GMT
Reply-To: S.A.McIntyre@durham.ac.uk
Organization: Synapse Computer Consultants
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

ede978e@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Robert D. Nicholson) writes:
: 
: Let's get on a talk about important issues, I think RightBrain has
: learnt a very important leason from this episode.
: 

I'm feeling cynical -- how long till soemthing similar happens again?
It's been about 8 months since the Modem Naming Game...

: I welcome any flames on this, since I won't answer them as I have a thesis
: to get out the door.

Just out of curiosity, are you using PasteUp for it?

Scott
From: andrew@cubetech.com (Andrew Loewenstern)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
Subject: Re: right brain?
Date: 12 Sep 92 00:33:45 GMT
Organization: Cube Technologies, Inc.

I'm making this very short for a reason.

If any of you cared a bucket of warm spit's worth about protecting the
interests or bandwidth of other Usenet users; if there were any pangs
of sympathy; if you actually respected any of the Usenet guidelines
(which, I believe, do not advocate public flaming of users); you would
have flamed Glenn & Jack (or whomever you are flaming this week as it
seems the same people are always flaming someone for something) in
E-MAIL.


andrew
19 years old and behind Jack and Glenn all the way.
I also thought Jack's post was highly informative.
-- 
andrew@cubetech.com     | "We shall not cease from exploration
Andrew Loewenstern      |  And the end of our exploring
Cube Technologies, Inc. |  Will be to arrive where we started
                        |  And know the place for the first time." -T.S. Eliot
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: Michael.Welch@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Michael Welch)
Subject: NeXT sighting on NBC: Gumball
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 23:15:35 GMT

Gentlemen,

todd@liveware writes:

  Gawd, I hope that bozo wasn't using a NeXT.  What a bummer
  to have such an ego maniac, butthead using a NeXT!!! ;')
  By the way, I spell class 1 a-hole, Bryant GUM-BALL.

This is fantastic! Not something to be ashamed of:

   Even Bryant Gumball can run Unix...on a NeXT.

Michael W.
(It's that ease-of-use thing)

--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: bill@chaos.phys.ualberta.ca (Bill Burris)
Subject: Re: Chrysler order for NS486?
Reply-To: bill@chaos.phys.ualberta.ca (Bill Burris)
Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 23:52:34 GMT

 In article <1992Sep9.163154.2876@leland.Stanford.EDU>  
 spagiola@frinext.stanford.edu (Stefano Pagiola) writes:
 > 
 > From yesterday's SF Chronicle, in the Technology column by Ken  
 > Siegmann:
 > ...
 > Steve Jobs' Next Computer Inc is close to a major deal to supply its  
 > latest software to Chrysler Corp.
 > ...
They need more then excellent software, they need someone like Toyota,
Honda, Mazda, or Nissan to design and build their cars for them.

Bill
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: wierda@ltb.ltb.bso.nl (Gerben Wierda)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
Subject: Software patent will hurt NeXT...
Date: 11 Sep 92 21:23:06 GMT
Organization: BSO/LT, Baarn, The Netherlands

Look at this:

------- Start of forwarded message -------
>From Patty_Leeper@NeXT.COM Fri Sep  4 12:11:22 1992
>Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 12:00:18 PDT
>From: Patty_Leeper@NeXT.COM
>To: all_ccs@NeXT.COM
>Subject: CCFlash! NonNeXT: Important Patent Information Needed
>Cc: jhiga@NeXT.COM
>Content-Length: 731
>X-Lines: 22


To All CCs:

We need some help in Japan.

Toshiba has filed an application for a patent in Japan. The patent
describes an electronic mail system capable of imbedding, delivering,
and playing back sound files.  We're trying to find publications
which describe such a system and is out in the public domain.  It
must predate the Toshiba claim of April 24, 1981.  This will allow
Canon to file an official objection to the Toshiba application and
prevent Toshiba from coming after NeXTMail in Japan.  We are trying
find something in the next week to ten days.

Do you know of anything?  Is there anyone who might know?  Are there
places we might go for this information?


Please respond to james_higa@next.com.
------- End of forwarded message -------

This came from the LPF list. Man, this is scary!

-- 
wierda@ltb.bso.nl (Gerben Wierda) || I speak for myself and not for my employer.
(+31) 2154 84415/(+31) 35 833539  || Support the League for Programming Freedom!
	"If you don't know where you are going, any road will take you there."
	(Almost from) Lewis Carroll, "Alice in Wonderland".
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: spagiola@frinext.stanford.edu (Stefano Pagiola)
Subject: Chrysler order for NS486?
Reply-To: spagiola@frinext.stanford.edu
Organization: DSO, Stanford University
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 16:31:54 GMT


From yesterday's SF Chronicle, in the Technology column by Ken  
Siegmann:

Next (sic) computer close to a deal with Chrysler

Steve Jobs' Next Computer Inc is close to a major deal to supply its  
latest software to Chrysler Corp.

Sources close to the Redwood City-based computer company say the no.3  
automaker will buy 3,000 copies of NextStep 486. 

[details on NS486 deleted]

To have a major corporation like Chrysler ready with a big order when  
Next finally finishes the software is certainly a coup.

"It's a pretty big win for Next," said analyst Tim Bajarin of  
Creative Strategies Inc in Santa Clara.  "But then anything would be  
a big win for Next."

The company has struggled for five years to establish utself as a  
significant player in desktop computing technology.  So far, despite  
some impressive technology, Next remains a fringe player.  A Chrysler  
deal could give Next the needed spark.



--
-
Stefano Pagiola
Food Research Institute, Stanford University
spagiola@frinext.stanford.edu (NeXTMail encouraged)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.advocacy
Subject: Glenn
From: feijai@endor.byu.edu (Sean Luke)
Date: 4 Sep 92 13:16:21 -0700
Reply-To: sean@digaudio.byu.edu

Sorry for posting this to the net, but I don't have any other recourse.   
:(

My mailer is freaking out and refusing to acknowledge rightbrain.com as a  
legal mailing address.  Is there any way to get hold of Glenn other than  
sending mail to glenn@rightbrain.com?  Glenn, are you out there?

Thanks.

--

Sean Luke
Brigham Young University                   MILK:  It Comes From Cows
sean@digaudio.byu.edu  
NeXTmail and nifty Mac stuff welcome
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware
From: robinc@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Delucca)
Subject: Re: Some DSP and Audio questions
Organization: Johns Hopkins University - Homewood Academic Computing
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 23:15:32 GMT

One thing that Next doesn't document well is how to get sound into
our machine. I don't mean through a mike, I mean recorded, short sounds
that play back cleanly. Can we use the microphone port or DSP port 
hooked to a sound source? If so, what is some good cheap software to 
control the input? 

Thanks 

DON'T respond please to address in from: header! Address is 
rdelucca@rosemary.uucp.jhu.edu

Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Keywords: DSP

In article <1992Sep9.164024.22900@socrates.umd.edu> mike@starburst.umd.edu (Michael F. Santangelo) writes:
>I'm now the proud owner of a NeXTstation TURBO and am thinking of
>using its DSP and/or Audio port of some scientific/acousting
>applications here at our lab...
>
>  1) Is the audio input (condensor mic on front of the mono monitor
>     and corresponding audio IN jack in the back) handled by the DSP
>     or by another dedicated A/D converter?  What is the frequency
>     response of the audio input?  How wide (bits) is the A/D
>     converter that drives it (if applicable)?
>  2) Generally, what kind of cables/interfaces (or how do I go about
>     finding out) are available for the DSP port on the NeXT?
>
>I am specifically interested in ways to interface the audio
>port and/or the DSP into some test equipment that generates analog
>signals.  Anyone have experience doing this?
>
>--
>-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>Michael F. Santangelo                 + Internet: mike@starburst.umd.edu
>Computer & Network Systems Director   +           mike@cbl.umd.edu
>CBL / CEES (Solomons Island)          + BITNET:   MIKE@UMUC
>University of Maryland                + Voice:    (410) 326-7237 (direct)
>                                      +           (410) 326-4281 x237


Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware
From: timm@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu (Tim McClarren)
Subject: Re: Mono Monitor Size: 17" or 16" or 15.5" ?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 11:22:22 GMT

bwilliam@iat.holonet.net (Bill Williams) writes:

>>I am a  bit annoyed that my  so-called 17" monochrome monitor seems to
>measure more like 16" (with a  picture of  15.5")

>Hmmm Well if you take the number of pixels per inch as quoted in the
>reference manuals (92) multiplied by the height and width using
>Pythagora's Theorem (x^2+Y^2= Diaganal^2) you see that NeXT DID NOT LIE
>and YOUR MONITOR MUST BE ~15.5 INCHES ELSE IT WOULD NOT MATCH THE SPECS.
> 
>I guess you just do not like the evil marketing slimy people that round-up
>to the nearest inch and THEN ADD THE PHANTOM INCHE OF GLASS UNDER THE BEZEL.
> 
>Thus a 14 inch monitor is always a 13 inch tube, and most 15 inch monitors
>are really 13 inch tubes. Lukily a 16 inch is a sixteen inch and thats
>what you have. PS I am writing this ON THE WORLDS LARGEST COMPUTER TUBE
>MONITOR... A Viking 24 inch from Monitorm (R.I.P.). I know its not exacly 24
>inches diagonally but as long as I always own the biggest and best I don't
>really count the inches.
> 
>BWilliams

Can't be so.  Mitsubishi makes a 35" monitor.
-- 
Tim McClarren     | "...a bajillion brilliant Jobsian lithium licks."
timm@ncsa.uiuc.edu|
(217)244-0015     |
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware
From: david@postman.gr.osf.org (David George)
Subject: Re: Terrible SCSI Transfer
Organization: OSF RI Grenoble
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 08:16:28 GMT

In article <Bu5vq5.3wF@iat.holonet.net>, bwilliam@iat.holonet.net (Bill Williams) writes:

I wrote :
|> > These generate a lot of interrupts for each SCSI transaction 
|> 
|> I Believe that NO COMPUTER could efficiently use individual interrupts
|> during the data tranfer phase of a SCSI transaction.

You have misunderstood.  On the 5390 (and other simple SCSI chips) an
interrupt is generated for each SCSI phase change.  Processor intervention
is required as a decision has to be made how to proceed depending on the
state.  The 53700 (et al) effectively replace intelligent host adapators (such
as Adaptec) and run simple software (scripts) which allows them to make these
decisions on their own.  The 5390 typically generates 4 or 5 interrupts per
SCSI operation, 53700 1 or 2 and the 53720 1.  Depending on the size of transfer, typically a block of 4 or 8K in a Unix filesystem (BBC), these interrupts can represent a significant overhead (as well as slowing down the system in general).

|> The NeXT is fine. Quite bellyaching about SCSI Transfer...

Any computer which uses the disk as backing storage can do to have faster 
peripheral I/O, especially when it's as memory hungry as the NeXT.

|> you probably don't have either:

I probably do, but luckily I don't need to connect a NeXT to any of them.

David.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware
From: halpin@vsg1.dsg.dec.com (Stephen E. Halpin)
Subject: Re: Mono Monitor Size: 17" or 16" or 15.5" ?
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 17:48:28 GMT

In article <timm.715864942@void> timm@void.ncsa.uiuc.edu (Tim McClarren) writes:
>bwilliam@iat.holonet.net (Bill Williams) writes:
   <<stuff deleted>>
>>what you have. PS I am writing this ON THE WORLDS LARGEST COMPUTER TUBE
>>MONITOR... A Viking 24 inch from Monitorm (R.I.P.). I know its not exacly 24
>>inches diagonally but as long as I always own the biggest and best I don't
>>really count the inches.
>> 
>>BWilliams
>
>Can't be so.  Mitsubishi makes a 35" monitor.
>-- 
>Tim McClarren     | "...a bajillion brilliant Jobsian lithium licks."
>timm@ncsa.uiuc.edu|
>(217)244-0015     |

Sony makes a 28" monitor (20" on a side) that displays 2048x2048.
If you absolutely MUST have it, its a mere $40,000.  -Steve
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware
Subject: Re: Max Serial Port Speed stuck at 9600
From: feijai@endor.byu.edu (Sean Luke)
Date: 9 Sep 92 13:36:42 -0700
Reply-To: sean@digaudio.byu.edu

In article <rcbaab.715445212@rw7.urc.tue.nl>  writes:

>Well, it is possible to use 57kbaud on ALL Macs, but use the 
>communications port. 


Whoa...

Surely you mean the Printer port.  It is the printer port that has the  
necessary burst electronics stuff to do AppleTalk.  The Communications  
(Phone) port can't do it...

Or am I dismally forgetful here?  :)

--

Sean Luke
Brigham Young University                   MILK:  It Comes From Cows
sean@digaudio.byu.edu  
NeXTmail and nifty Mac stuff welcome
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware
From: tjb@strangeways.unh.edu (Thomas J. Baker)
Subject: 8mm vs. 4mm (DAT)
Organization: University of New Hampshire,  Durham, NH
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:12:39 GMT

Anyone with any experiences in this area?  I have the opportunity to either
buy a used 2 year old Exabyte 8200 8mm or to wait a few more months and buy
a new 4mm DAT for the same ~$1000 price.  I've compared them (I had both
the Exabyte in question and a DEC TLZ04 bolted to my color turbo) and they
are pretty similiar in performance.  The Exabyte was about 10 minutes quicker
in backing up about 700MB but there are more DAT drives on campus than 8mm.

Any experience would be greately appreciated.

tjb

+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Baker        Director of the New Hampshire NeXT User Group | 
| P.O. Box 213           Internet/NeXTmail: tjb@strangeways.unh.edu |
| Durham, NH 03824                   Voice: (603) 743-4987          |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware