HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: fierkelab@bchm.biochem.duke.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Darrell Evans
Date: 12 Jan 93 16:28:33 GMT
Organization: Biochemistry

In article <1993Jan11.213407.16389@midway.uchicago.edu> thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu
(Ted Frank) writes:
...replying to a query about 3Bmen in the 70's.

>Pete Rose?  :)  Dave Johnson a fluke season or two in that time stretch.
>Graig Nettles.  Molitor did play a lot of third base, though he may have
>primarily been a 2B.

1)  Pete Rose, if he repents, may one day end up in the HOF... but he won't do
it as a 3B! ;) Pete is one of the few players who may end up in the HOF without
a clearly defined position, having started his career as an OF, shifting to
third about midway through his career, moving to first later in his career, and
then crawling off the bench to get those last few hits to pass Ty Cobb.  Bill
James wrote an interesting note about these "undefinable" players  a couple of
years ago...Harmon Killebrew was another, and I know there were two more, but I
can't remember off the top of my head who they were.

2)  Dave Johnson was a 2B!  First in Baltimore, where Brooks was on 3rd, and
later in Atlanta, where Darrell Evans was on third.  1973 (I think)...Evans,
Johnson, and Hank Aaron all hit 40+ HR, setting a ML record...and the Braves
finished 5th in the division.  Talk about a lack of pitching!  Niekro, then
pray for a Hurricane!
>
>Evans stopped being a third baseman fairly early -- by 1984, he was
>only there for about 20 games or so.

I don't know, I thought he started at 3B about 1971...12 years at 3B isn't bad
at all.  And Evans would appear to be a better canidate than Keltner.  I'd say
he's more comparable to Harland Clift, the St. Louis Brown 3B of the 30's who
apparantly had an amazing bat, but no one remembers anything about because the
Browns were so bad.  James once asked if anyone knew anything about Clift,
because looking at his numbers, one would think he would have been in the Hall.


Eric Roush			Deck us all with Boston Charlie
fierkelab@			Walla Walla Wash and Kalamazoo!
bchm.biochem.duke.edu	Nora's freezin' on the Trolley,
				Swaller Dollar Cauliflower Alla-ga-Roo!

				Walt Kelley
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: roger@crux.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig)
Subject: Re: Alomar and Range Factor (was Re: Lists: The Best Players In Baseball)
Originator: news@nimaster
Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig)
Organization: Princeton University
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 02:18:23 GMT

In article <1993Jan9.021025.374@Princeton.EDU> niepornt@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Marc Nieporent) writes:
>In article <1993Jan8.142208.5524@sni.ca> dave@snitor.sni.ca (Dave Till) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan8.032738.23621@athena.mit.edu> cmk@athena.mit.edu (Charles M Kozierok) writes:

>>BTW:  has anyone else noticed that Alomar's stats resemble those of the
>>young Joe Morgan?  Alomar isn't walking quite as much as Morgan yet, and
>>doesn't have the power that the mature Morgan did, but they both have
>>the same broad range of skills...

>Which brings up a question I've been meaning to ask.  I'm too young to
>remember them first hand, so how did Joe Morgan get those MVP awards?  
>I can't believe that could happen.  Not that he didn't deserve them; of 
>COURSE he did.  I can't believe that the mediots were smart enough to 
>give MVPs to a guy who didn't hit a billion home runs and didn't lead the 
>league in RBIs.  I mean, look how many it years it was before Rickey got
>one - how did Morgan manage?

Easy.  It was about the 4th year in a row that he should have won, when he
did.  The next year, he did everything better.

Morgan's 72-77 is one of the great peak performances in baseball history.
He led the Big Red Machine in OBP, SLG, and of course SB-CS (or reasonable
equivalent) in that time.   Bench, Perez, Rose -- not close.

Roger
From: fls@econ.duke.edu (Forrest Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Torre in HoF
Date: 12 Jan 93 17:58:23 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.


	I don't have any stats handy, but I think Joe Torre might be the best
of the former Braves not in the Hall.  Torre was an outstanding catcher for
the Braves, then I believe he probably moved to third base with the Cards.
He was a league-leading hitter, he had power.  He is certainly better qualified
for enshrinement than Darryl "Pop Up" Evans (a.k.a., Howdy Doody).  Torre also
has a pretty fair record as a manager (at least for the first halves of seasons).  It's a rare combination for a catcher to hit for average, with power, and
manage the Braves to the playoffs.
	Darryl Evans would have been a Hall of Fame SOFTBALL player.  (And I
caught a ball he fouled into the Atlanta Stadium Press Box prior to launching
one of his popups that *did* clear the outfield fence.)
-- 
   __  __                                     
  |__ |__                                    %  shall we eggplant,
  | |  __|  fls@keynes.econ.duke.edu         %  shall we corn,
    |__                                      %  shall we succotash?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: rsykes@AFIT.AF.MIL
Subject: REQUEST: MLB team logos in any format
Organization: Air Force Institue of Technology, WPAFB OH
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 13:42:07 GMT

would like pictures of team logos in any format to add to my collection
pleas post, mail, or tell of ftp site with them

  |\/\/\/|  
  |      |  
  |      |  
  | (o)(o)  
  C      _)    the Enforcer
   | ,___|  /  rsykes@afit.af.mil
   |   /    
  /____\   -Space Mountain, it's a 60 min ride that last all night long !!!! 
 /      \  -WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
Subject: Re: Definitive "Baby Ruth" answer
Followup-To: rec.sport.baseball,alt.folklore.urban
Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 02:31:37 GMT

[repost from alt.folklore.urban]
In article <1993Jan08.205858.5017@microsoft.com> leecr@microsoft.com (Lee Crocker) writes:
>According to a spokesman for Nestle foods, the maker of Baby Ruth
>candy bars, they were named after Grover Cleveland's daughter
>Ruth, not the ball player.  They were first marketed in 1893.
>
>Nestle foods can be reached at 818-549-6000 for those who care
>to verify this.
>
>How about a FAQ addition:
>
>F: "Baby Ruth" candy bars are named after George "Babe" Ruth
>T: "Baby Ruth" candy bars are named after President Cleveland's daughter.
-- 
ted frank                     | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu 
standard disclaimers          | void where prohibited
the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
never shout movie in a crowded firestation
From: shari@rosevax.rosemount.com (Shari Nelson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re:Orioles Tix
Date: 7 Jan 1993 12:42:17 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


Thanks to all who sent me the pertinent info. There were so many responses,
I don't have time to answer them all back!

WIN TWINS!
shari
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: mjones@fenway.aix.kingston.ibm.com (Mike Jones)
Subject: Re: Hall of Fame voting (read - Disgusted)
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 93 16:17:13 GMT
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

acker@maple.circa.ufl.edu writes:
: Still, though, a part of me wants to attain some of those earlier goals.
: Like joining the BBWAA (BaseBall Writers of America Association for those of
: you still reading).  And why do I want to join that association?
: BECAUSE THE CURRENT MEMBERS ARE IGNORANT, STUPID, GENERAL WASTES OF BRAIN
: TISSUE THAT HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CLUE ABOUT THE SPORT OF BASEBALL.
: Well, most of them anyway.  How can 35% of the members of the BBWAA choose NOT
: to elect a man who won 318 games in his career, struck out more than 3500
: batters, threw a no-hitter and became the oldest player ever to throw a shutout?
: And most of this for perhaps the worst team of the 1970's?

Well, there's your problem. You're basic your argument on numbers! As a
certain Canadian is never shy about telling us, the numbers don't mean
anything. Obviously those sportswriters saw this guy play much more than you
or I and know all about his intangibles. He undoubtedly won all those games
late in the year after the pennant had been decided in a selfish bid to pad
his own stats and is now getting the contempt from knowledgable baseball
people that he so richly deserves, right?

Note for the sarcasm-impaired: sprinkle liberally with :-)'s.

: Phil Niekro deserves to be in the hall of fame.  Period.

Yup. Very possibly more than Reggie does.

   Mike Jones  |  AIX/ESA Development  |  mjones@donald.aix.kingston.ibm.com

Morality is only moral when it is voluntary.
	- Lincoln Steffens
From: rickert@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (John H. Rickert)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: attend (WAS Re: Expos Clinch! Wallach to Dodgers)
Date: 4 Jan 1993 22:19:14 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
Reply-To: rickert@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (John H. Rickert)
NNTP-Posting-Host: g215a-1.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

In article <1993Jan3.195845.26160@midway.uchicago.edu>  
thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank) writes:
> It's not too radical, but it is quite unproven.  Fans like winning more
> than they like any particular player, with the possible exception of
> Fernando Valenzuela, who, to my knowledge, is the only player who has
> proven ability in drawing fans above and beyond his contribution to the
> team's winning percentage.

How about Fidrych? 

john rickert
rickert@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
From: shari@rosevax.rosemount.com (Shari Nelson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Orioles schedule/tickets
Date: 5 Jan 1993 17:31:11 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu



A question to any Orioles fans....

My husband and I will be visiting Annapolis this May (nephew graduating from the Academy),
and we'ld love to see an Orioles game while in town. Has the schudule been set yet? If so,
when are they at home from say, May 20-31, and who do they play? Also, what are ticket prices,
the best sections, phone numbers to call, etc..... Any info is greatly appreciated.

WIN TWINS!
shari		shari@rosemount.com

Xref: sparky rec.sport.baseball:37300 alt.folklore.urban:33031
From: pablo@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Pablo A Iglesias)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball,alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Definitive "Baby Ruth" answer
Date: 9 Jan 1993 12:28:55 -0500
Organization: Homewood Academic Computing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md, USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu

In article <1993Jan9.045938.3394@leland.Stanford.EDU> dkeisen@leland.Stanford.EDU (Dave Eisen) writes:
>In article <1993Jan08.205858.5017@microsoft.com> leecr@microsoft.com (Lee Crocker) writes:
>>According to a spokesman for Nestle foods, the maker of Baby Ruth
>>candy bars, they were named after Grover Cleveland's daughter
>>Ruth, not the ball player.  They were first marketed in 1893.
>
>This raises the more interesting question of where Babe Ruth
>got *his* nickname. Was he named after the candy bar? After
>President Cleveland's daughter? Or was Ruth's nickname merely
>a curious coincidence?

Hey I know the answer to this.  Babe Ruth started playing ball for
a minor league team here in Baltimmore whose manager was famous for
bringing really young players into the league.  Supposedly when he
started (at the age of 16-17) someone from the crowd yelled, "Is this
one of your new babes" and the name stuck.  There is at least one other
player whose nick-name of Babe also came through the association with
this minor league team (it is of course possible that the nickname
stcuk because of the candy bar/or the president's daughter etc)

I can dig up the details if you want; this is from memory.
>-- 
>Dave Eisen                               Sequoia Peripherals: (415) 967-5644


-- 
Pablo
From: ez027993@dale.ucdavis.edu (Gary The Big Picture Huckabay)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Get a life baseball fans... Try ping-pong!
Date: 11 Jan 93 16:50:11 GMT
Organization: Roger Maynard Crab Gumbo Club, Ltd.


Khanh Nguyen writes:
|I finally stooped so low as to watch a baseball game the other day.  It was
|a tape of the "World" Series!  What a joke!  I can't believe you people.  I
|have seen some half-assed sports in my day, but baseball has got to take
|the cake.  I mean, really, a bunch of fat, old men running around in kid's
|outfits, scratching themselves, and spitting on national television.  

Actually, Khanh, from your description, it sounds like you are mistaken.
I believe you may have been tuned in to C-SPAN.

|And what do these slobs get paid?  $50,000,000 per second!  For what?

Wow!  *There's* some change for you.  Apparently, Steinbrenner's back...

|Have you seen a modern table tennis tourney lately?  Real action!  Mano a
|mano battle for supremacy on the board.  Each one grabbing his paddle
|instead of his crotch.

I was always taught that if I 'grab my paddle', as you like to call it,
I'd grow hair on my palms.

|Pardon my saying so, but the only thing lamer than baseball is what you
|call "football."

What about ESPN's "World of Flyfishing"?

|No flames necessary-- although I'm not sure you knobheads could scrape up
|enough intelligence between you to come up with a good one.  Anyway, I'm
|sure you're all REALLY offended.  Offended-- that's a big person word for
|when you don't like something that someone said.  

Bite me.  That's a little person's phrase for 'bite me.'

-- 
*   Gary Huckabay   * "There is a special place in Hell for people like   *
* "Bears virtually  *  you, Gary.  You'll be sharing a room with Rip      *
* no resemblance to *  Taylor, Jim Nabors, Richard Simmons, and America's *
*  David Thornley." *  Scoutmaster General, Charles Nelson Reilly." - AR. *
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball,alt.folklore.urban
From: dkeisen@leland.Stanford.EDU (Dave Eisen)
Subject: Re: Definitive "Baby Ruth" answer
Organization: Sequoia Peripherals, Inc.
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 93 04:59:38 GMT

In article <1993Jan08.205858.5017@microsoft.com> leecr@microsoft.com (Lee Crocker) writes:
>According to a spokesman for Nestle foods, the maker of Baby Ruth
>candy bars, they were named after Grover Cleveland's daughter
>Ruth, not the ball player.  They were first marketed in 1893.

This raises the more interesting question of where Babe Ruth
got *his* nickname. Was he named after the candy bar? After
President Cleveland's daughter? Or was Ruth's nickname merely
a curious coincidence?


-- 
Dave Eisen                               Sequoia Peripherals: (415) 967-5644
dkeisen@leland.Stanford.EDU              Home:                (415) 321-5154
       There's something in my library to offend everybody. 
          --- Washington Coalition Against Censorship
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: sckelm@iastate.edu (Steven C Kelm)
Subject: Fryman signs contract
Followup-To: sckelm@iastate.edu
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 18:17:52 GMT

ESPN reported that Travis Fryman was resigned by the Tigers to a one-year(?)
contract for $650,000.  Yes, I said $650,000.  Admittedly, he hasn't been
around long enough for arbitration, but one would think he could have gotten
more.  I mean this is one of the best young infielders in the game.  In a 
time when Greg Gagne will be paid $3.3 million per season, Fryman at $650,000
could be the bargain of the year.

Steve Kelm        sckelm@iastate.edu
From: jlevy@hamp.hampshire.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: The Best First-base Player in !993
Date: 10 Jan 93 19:10:12 EDT
Organization: Hampshire College
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: hamp.hampshire.edu

In article <C0M6pC.IIp@news.iastate.edu>, vbdiep@iastate.edu (Vinh Diep) writes:
> 	While many of you are arguing about Will Clark and Frank Thomas, and 
> one is better than the other, one player that some of you seem to ignore will
> surprise baseball fans in 1993. That All-Star first-baseman is DON MATTINGLY.


okay, I'm a big time Yankee fan and all, and I think they made some really
great moves this winter (especially the abbott deal), but why would Don
mattingly all of a sudden turn it all around and come back? he's had three
straight mediorce (or worse) years, with his advanceing age and bad back, why
would he be the player that you pick to suddenly remember how to hit the ball.
maybe if you said wade Boggs (i now you were talking about a first baseman
here, but you see my point). Which brings up the question: why is Don mattingly
still treated like a star in the toughest sports town of all?
why aren't all those callers on the talk shows yelling about how Mattingly's
bat is killing us (certainly an exaggeration) etc. etc.?
the only answer I can come up with is ugly but probably true.
Donny is a white boy.
kind of a sad story, really.

Jon Levy 
hampshire College

>  	Any questions?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: steph@pegasus.cs.uiuc.edu (Dale Stephenson)
Subject: Re: Ted's Simmon's latest acquisition
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 05:38:56 GMT

In <UfG=TEj0BwxdBmW2o7@transarc.com> Ken_Ziolkowski@transarc.com writes:


>  WTAE radio just announced that the Pirates have
>signed Lonnie Smith to a one-year contract. Terms
>have not been disclosed.

>  My question is why?????

Outfielder shortage?

>  Are Biff and Spliff out to destroy this team?

>  Can one of you statheads post Lonnie's stats for
>the past year and his projected stats for '93?

Past year:  247/324/437
Next year:  265/351/402

That's above average offense, but Lonnie is pretty bad defensively.

>  First they signed "Payload" Pena, then John
>Candelaria, and now Lonnie Smith.

STATS projections for 1993:
Al Pena 2.95 ERA (1 HR per 11 IP)
No projection for the ancient Candy Man

>  What are these people thinking?

Simmons is still a Cardinal fan at heart :->

-- 
Dale J. Stephenson |*| (steph@cs.uiuc.edu) |*| Baseball fanatic

  "It is considered good to look wise, especially when not 
   overburdened with information" -- J. Golden Kimball
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: lbarnes@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu (Laura L. Barnes)
Subject: Re: Hall of Fame voting (read - Disgusted)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 21:09:32 GMT

Mea culpa.  I should have thought the post out before I wrote.  I still don't 
think Jackson should have made it the first time and was surprised that 
Niekro didn't make it on the first try.  I was also surprised that Garvey 
didn't finish higher in the voting.  That's all and it's what I should have 
said in the first place.  I appreciate all those who took the time to post 
stats in response.  'Nuff said.

Laura
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: jjd@cray.com (Jeff Drummond)
Subject: Re: Baseball rules question
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 12 Jan 93 12:43:22 CST

In article <1993Jan11.204300.8472@athena.mit.edu> frisch1@athena.mit.edu (Jonathan Katz) writes:
>Here's a baseball rules question which I've never seen come up:
>Say there's a runner on first, running with the pitch, and the batter 
>hits a pitch foul and into the stands.  

The runner must return and touch the base.  Specifically, rule 5.09(c)
states:

  "A foul ball is not caught; runners return.  The umpire shall not
  put the ball in play until all runners have retouched their bases"

>Now, of course, the umpire takes out a new ball and throws it to the pitcher.
>However, what if the runner is still midway between first and second (he was
>running with the pitch, remember) when the pitcher gets the ball from the umpire?

This is a mistake on the umpire's part if the runner(s) have not
retouched their bases.  However...

>Obviously the runner can't be thrown out, but at what point _can_ he be thrown
>out?

...the runner _can_ be thrown out once the ball is in play.

>For instance, is there any rule which says that the runner must come back and
>touch the first base bag before the ball is in play?  This seems to be what
>occurs.

Yes, the runner must return and touch the base.  In practice, the umpires
seem to only require that the runner's be close to their original base
before putting the ball in play.  I've seen cases where the runner did
not actually retouch the base.

>-Jonathan Katz

-Jeff    jjd@cray.com
--
"Be like the forces of correction:
when the ball is in play, there is only the tag;
when the play is over, there is only the appeal;
when the umpire errs, there is only the protest."
-Lao "Lefty" Tzu in _The_Tao_of_Baseball_, Chapter 23.
From: lynch@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Howard Lynch)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 23:49:05 GMT
Subject: Re: Get a life baseball fans... Try ping-pong!
Organization: OCD IC MFG
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball

I just want to say that I have enjoyed these flames enough to 
justify the bandwidth of the whole thing!

Keep 'em flying!

Lynch "MOB"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: frisch1@athena.mit.edu (Jonathan Katz)
Subject: Re: Lists: The Best Players In Baseeball
Keywords: stars best baseball
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 07:11:22 GMT

I disagree on two counts:
best 3B: not Edgar Martinez, but Gary Shefield

best 3B under 25: not Palmer or Jefferies, but Dave Hollinds (although I'm not
100% sure he's under 25)
-Jonathan Katz
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: niepornt@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Marc Nieporent)
Subject: Re: Cecil signs :-( :-( :-(
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 02:26:10 GMT

In<1993Jan8.124750@IASTATE.EDU> tloughin@IASTATE.EDU (Thomas M Loughin) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan7.224639.26163@cs.cornell.edu>, tedward@cs.cornell.edu (Edward [Ted] Fischer) writes:
>> > In article <1993Jan7.221131.17994@cs.wayne.edu> dfl@math.wayne.edu (David
>Frohardt-Lane) writes:

>> > Bonds...
>> > 1) is younger, by about two years and thirty pounds.
>> > 2) is a Real Baserunner.
>> > 3) plays outstanding defense.
>> > 4) has been a better slugger each of the last two years (fewer HR,
>> >    but more 1B, 2B, and 3B)
>> > 5) Runs a *very* good batting average.
>> > 6) Walks 100 times a year.
>> > 7) Has played on a winning team.

>> You guys get so bogged down in your stats and comparisons, that you
>> forget what the Detroit owner really wants to do - get people to
>> the park and make money.  Fielder is as big (no pun intended) in
>> Detroit as other superstars are in other towns.  When the town loses
>> the superstars, they tend not to support the team until they either
>> get a new superstar or start winning.  

>Gee, Rich, ya got any STATS on how many fans Cecil brings to the ballpark?
>I'll bet they're mostly big eaters, too, providing a bigger concession take,
>unlike those scrawny Barry Bonds fans.  I'd like to see a COMPARISON...;-}

>In truth, you're probably right, though.  I can't imagine that Milt Cuyler 
>would pack 'em in the park.

That's true, but it isn't the point.  As far as is known, *no* player
brings fans to the park.  *Winning* does.  Now, with Cecil, they'd win
more than with Cuyler.

But for the money they paid Cecil, they could have signed Bonds!  Who gives
them *more* wins.  And *isn't* in a clear pattern of decline.

Or Maddux, or Cone.  Both of whom are worth more than Cecil, and fill
more of a need for Detroit.  

Or they could have gotten McGwire for less, AND signed a Smiley or something.

Obviously, not all of these people necessarily were going to want to play 
in Detroit, so no flames about "Maddux only wanted to play in Atlanta," 
please.  My point is that if the Tigers were willing to spend this kind
of money, they could have gotten more, or at least *tried.*

-- 
David M. Nieporent   | Is it too early to start making predictions for 1993?
niepornt@phoenix.    | Probably, but that never stopped me before.
   princeton.edu     | ALE: Baltimore ALW: Chicago NLE: Montreal NLW: Atlanta
Baltimore Orioles 93 | AL MVP: Cal Ripken  AL Cy Young: Mike Mussina