HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pvr@wang.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: 120Mb tapes on SCO UNIX
Date: 10 Nov 92 13:25:54 GMT
Organization: Wang Labs, Lowell MA, USA

frigo@asiago.med.ge.com (Fred Frigo 5-5806) writes:

>You can write DC600A tapes in a 150 M byte drive, but SCO will
>only allow you to put 60 M bytes on the tape.  Regular 60M
>byte drives (old Sun style) will not be able to read your tapes
>produced on the 150 M byte drives, but the 60 M tapes produced
>on the older drives can be read on the 150 M byte drives.

	This is not exactly correct.   150 Meg tape drives (QIC 150)
cannot write in 60 Meg (QIC 24) format.   DC600A tape cartridges
are 120 Meg (QIC 120) tapes.   Most QIC 150 tape drives will write QIC 120
tape cartridges, but only in QIC 120 format.   The tape type
is automatically recognised by the drive.   The format is
encoded in the hole pattern at the beginning of the tape.
Most QIC 150 drives can read QIC 24 tapes so there
is backward compatibility for reading.

	The opreating system does not determine how much can
be written to tape devices.   The drive stops when it hits 
the end of media (EOM) mark.   The reason that the tapes cannot
be read on the Sun is that they are QIC 120 tapes and cannot 
be read on a QIC 24 drive.
--
>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter Reilley ..... pvr@wiis.wang.com ..... KA1LAT <<<<<<<<<<<<<
                     Well, that about says it.
From: ssanbeg@visual.spk.wa.us (Scott Sanbeg)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Using 16550AFN with SCO 3.2.4
Date: 7 Nov 92 20:30:23 GMT
Organization: The Visual Market - Spokane, WA

In article <1dbi9aINN17s@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> ba014@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Matthew C. Brinkhoff) writes:
>
>I've got SCO SVR3.2.4 and I'm attempting to use a V.32 modem with the
>port rate locked at 19.2kbps.  With RTS/CTS flow control, I'm losing
>characters like mad...  I installed a 16550AFN UART on the COM2 port
>(where the modem resides), but it doesn't seem to be enabled (?).

I'm curious to see what else you may do on this, by the way.

In the meantime, below is a clip from my /etc/gettydefs - I'm running
v3.2.4 and using 16550AFNs here (successfully).


12 # B2400 EXTB HUPCL # B38400 EXTB CTSFLOW CS8 SANE HUPCL 
	ECHOE TAB3 -IXANY -IXON -IXOFF -CLOCAL #\r\n@!login: # 16

13 # B4800 EXTB HUPCL # B38400 EXTB CTSFLOW CS8 SANE HUPCL 
	ECHOE TAB3 -IXANY -IXON -IXOFF -CLOCAL #\r\n@!login: # 12

14 # B9600 EXTB HUPCL # B38400 EXTB CTSFLOW CS8 SANE HUPCL 
	ECHOE TAB3 -IXANY -IXON -IXOFF -CLOCAL #\r\n@!login: # 13

15 # B19200 EXTB HUPCL # B19200 EXTB CTSFLOW CS8 SANE HUPCL
	ECHOE TAB3 -IXANY -IXON -IXOFF -CLOCAL #\r\n@!login: # 14

16 # B38400 EXTB HUPCL # B38400 EXTB CTSFLOW CS8 SANE HUPCL 
	ECHOE TAB3 -IXANY -IXON -IXOFF -CLOCAL #\r\n@!login: # 15

Scott

 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Scott Sanbeg     UNIX Systems Administrator       (509)535-2561
ssanbeg@visual.spk.wa.us (or) ...!uunet!tau-ceti!visual!ssanbeg
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: dave@revcan.rct.ca (David Blackwood)
Subject: Re: accessing NOVELL from SCO-ODT
Organization: Revenue Canada, Taxation; Office Communications Division
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 21:49:30 GMT

In article <1dpl8bINNkjq@rave.larc.nasa.gov> jka@windshear.larc.nasa.gov (J. Keith Alston) writes:
>   I'm running SCO ODT. I need to know if there is any way that
>   ODT's DOS under unix can access a novell network? Or is there any
>   way that the novell net can be accessed directly from SCO unix?
>   any ideas/information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Install Novell's TCP/IP and NFS and then you can mount your Novell
filesystem(s) directly on your ODT file system and access it using
either DOS Merge or UNIX commands.
-- 
D. J. Blackwood			Room 1139, 400 Cumberland Street
Systems Integration Manager	Ottawa, Ontario, Canada  K1A 0L8
Office Communications Division	voice: +1 613 957 9305, fax: +1 613 952 1095
Revenue Canada, Taxation	email: uunet.ca!revcan!dave, dave@revcan.rct.ca
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: pwilson@world.std.com (Pete Wilson)
Subject: How configure Zoom v.32bis modem?
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 01:53:35 GMT

I just installed a Zoom v.32bis 14.4Kb fax modem on my
386 running SVR4. I can call out ok, but the modem
won't answer an incoming call. Anybody know how to tell
this thing to answer?
--
Thanks, Pete Wilson (pwilson@world.std.com)
From: stlouis@unixg.ubc.ca (Phill St. Louis)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: ISC 2.2 (Sys V Rel 3.2) Adding Swap?
Date: 5 Nov 1992 19:12:34 GMT
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca

I have read the manual and the 386 FAQ, and my question was not answered, so...

When adding a second disk to an ISC Sys V Rel. 3.2 machine, in the partitioning,
the screen comes up with a partition for swap.  Does this work for adding
extra swap?  It seems too simple to believe.  I have previously added disks
to a Sun and the documentation for SunOs states very clearly how to do it,
but the ISC docs are lacking in info about this stuff.

The person who installed the operating system on this machine did not set
asside enough swap and I would like to add some more with the second disk.

Phill St-Louis
Health Care & Epidemiology
U.B.C.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: jdp@polstra.uucp (John Polstra)
Subject: Esix 4.0.4 vs. SAS 1.25
Organization: Polstra & Co., Inc., Seattle, WA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:08:21 GMT

Has anybody gotten SAS 1.25 to work under Esix 4.0.4?

I tried it today as the driver for my COM1 and COM2 ports.  It
compiled and installed without a hitch.  I left the old "asy" driver
installed, but disabled it in the "sdevice.d/asy" file.

When I rebooted with the new system, the SAS signon message printed out,
looking exactly like I thought it should.  Then the system panicked with
a complaint that it couldn't mount the root filesystem.  I tried it once
again just to be sure, but it did exactly the same thing again.

When I removed SAS and re-enabled "asy" everything worked again.

One thing I should mention is that my COM1/2 board is a strange clone
with a big VLSI chip instead of the usual 16[45]50 chips.  However,
SAS's signon message indicated that it did recognize the devices as
16450s, which is what I would expect.  And "asy" drives the chip OK (OK
for "asy", anyway).

Any ideas?
-- 
   John Polstra                              polstra!jdp@uunet.uu.net
   John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                  ...!uunet!polstra!jdp
   Seattle, Washington USA   Phone (206) 932-6482, FAX (206) 935-1262
   "Self-knowledge is always bad news."                 -- John Barth
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: ukrainec@nimios.eng.mcmaster.ca (Andrew Ukrainec)
Subject: Re: ... shell  for Sysv 3.2? (w command line editing)?
Organization: Communications Research Laboratory, McMaster University
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 01:54:00 GMT

In article <1585@b1.babss.UUCP> wadswort@babss.UUCP (John H. Wadsworth) writes:
>>I'm using tcsh.  ..... 

I'm using the Plan 9 (rc) shell under ISC 3.0 System V R3.2.  I like it quite
a bit, and you can compile the GNU readline command line editing into
it.  It has a much more logical syntax that sh, and I haven't found any
bugs.  The only down side is no job control.

-- 
         Andrew Ukrainec                 ukrainec@nimios.eng.mcmaster.ca 
          <    (*) >               /  \             < (*)    >           
Communications Research Laboratory      McMaster Univ, Hamilton, Ontario
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.programmer
From: grant@pixie.genie.uottawa.ca (Grant Henderson)
Subject: Looking for BSD printer daemon
Originator: grant@shamin.genie.uottawa.ca
Keywords: BSD printer daemon
Organization: MCRLab - University of Ottawa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 19:40:10 GMT


Does anyone know where I can get the source for a BSD printer daemon which
will run on a system V machine (SCO ODT 1.1) and will accept printer requests
across the network?

Thanks in advance 
Grant

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grant Henderson                            grant@shamin.genie.uottawa.ca
Multimedia Communications Research Lab            Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Univerity of Ottawa                                       (613) 564-9247        
Xref: sparky comp.unix.sysv386:16306 comp.unix.sys5.r4:456
From: ti@bazooka.amb.org (Ti Kan)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.sys5.r4
Subject: Re: Weitek 4167 and SVR4
Keywords: weitek, svr4, speed
Date: 7 Nov 92 06:38:50 GMT
Reply-To: ti@bazooka.UUCP (Ti Kan)
Followup-To: comp.unix.sysv386
Organization: AMB Research Labs, Sunnyvale, CA.

In article <1992Nov6.010249.26474@netcom.com> cgates@netcom.com (Craig Gates) writes:
>I'm considering buying and installing a Weitek 4167 in my 486DX 33Mhz.
>Would the speedup be worth the money? I see in some ads that the co-processor
>can be had for $350-500.

Even if the OS supports the Weitek, it is not likely that your applications
were compiled to use the Weitek chip.  The Weitek is not Intel 387 compatible
and applications needs to be compiled with special compilers that generate
Weitek instructions in order to take advantage of the chip.

I'd keep the money...

-Ti
-- 
    ///  Ti Kan                vorsprung durch technik
   ///   AMB Research Laboratories, Sunnyvale, CA. USA
  ///    ti@amb.org
 //////  ...!{decwrl,synopsys,tandem,tsoft,ultra}!sgiblab!bazooka!ti
///      ...!{uunet,sun,apple,sco}!altos!bazooka!ti
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.xenix.sco
From: gryphon@openage.openage.com (The Golden Gryphon)
Subject: Re: Everex Step MP anybody?
Organization: Open Age, Inc.
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 22:42:10 GMT
Keywords: MP

john@jho.com (John Ho) writes:

>Anybody has experience with the Everex Step MP multi-processor
>486s running SCO-MPX software?

A from major problems with their EISA bus causing the OS to crash when you load
MPX, a Racal Interlan ES-3210 EISA ethernet board, and a DPT EISA SCSI
controller, there was nothing wrong.  Everex manufacturing was labled as the
problem, but no solution was found before the customer threw the machines and
us out the door.  Now it looks like the whole project is going to hell in a
hand basket.  I would recommend you look elsewhere for MPX boxes.  There are a
lot of them like the Compaq and DEC machines that are better.

-- 
The Golden Gryphon 				gryphon@openage.COM
Solve a man's problem and he has 1 less.        No incumbents in 92.
"Mad Scientists seeks mindless brawny assistants, good pay, quite location."
Openage - The Premier SCO UNIX integrator in the Washington D.C. area
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: guru@camelot.bradley.edu (Jerry Whelan)
Subject: Re: Weitek 4167 and SVR4
Keywords: weitek, svr4, speed
Organization: The Smelly Ditch
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 23:03:08 GMT

ti@bazooka.UUCP (Ti Kan) writes:
-} cgates@netcom.com (Craig Gates) writes:
-} >I'm considering buying and installing a Weitek 4167 in my 486DX 33Mhz.
-} >Would the speedup be worth the money? I see in some ads that the coprocessor
-} >can be had for $350-500.
-} 
-} Even if the OS supports the Weitek, it is not likely that your applications
-} were compiled to use the Weitek chip.  The Weitek is not Intel 387 compatible
-} and applications needs to be compiled with special compilers that generate
-} Weitek instructions in order to take advantage of the chip.

	The math libraries for AT&T's version of SVR4 (and thus probably
all vendors' versions) support the Weitek as we well as the 387 chipsets.
You don't need to recompile or anything as the decision on what instructions
to use is done at run time.
	However, as the original poster says he works primarily with X11
and designs user interface stuff, he probably is not doing much floating
point work (X by itself has very few, if any, functions that do floating
point calculations) and thus would not see much speedup if he were to
install a math coprocessor.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
``written by a drunken insane pathological liar''        guru@stasi.bradley.edu
From: jka@windshear.larc.nasa.gov (J. Keith Alston)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: accessing NOVELL from SCO-ODT
Date: 11 Nov 1992 00:48:11 GMT
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA  USA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: windshear.larc.nasa.gov
Originator: jka@windshear.larc.nasa.gov


Hi,
   I'm running SCO ODT. I need to know if there is any way that
   ODT's DOS under unix can access a novell network? Or is there any
   way that the novell net can be accessed directly from SCO unix?
   any ideas/information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

-Keith Alston
 jka@windshear.larc.nasa.gov

   
-- 
************************      Don't just do it!     ***********************
Lockheed Eng. and Sci. Co./Nasa Larc|J. Keith Alston jka@windshear.larc.nasa.gov
From: nosilla@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Andrew J. Templin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Dialup Passwords
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:06:33 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Dept. of CS Ball State University Muncie IN


Ok.  I am looking through UNIX System Security by Farrow (1991), and
I notice that System V R 3.2 has the ability to make a certain port 
more secure via a dialup password.

It tells me to create /etc/dialups and /etc/d_passwd.  /etc/dialups
contains the port to protect, and d_passwd is the shell and password 
to look for on login.

No problem up to now.

Here is my question:  In the book, Farrow shows the /etc/d_passwd file
like this:

/bin/ksh:H4fFsWOjoDw2D:
/bin/sh:f30kDC4Fge5Jf:
/usr/lib/uucp/uucico::

Ok, ksh and sh require a dialup password, uucico does not require one.

How do I set the password for this?  I can find nothing in the documentation
(just like Farrow said), and I am at a loss on how to do this.

Help?  Anyone?

E-Mail to: nosilla@bsu-cs.bsu.edu

Thank you in advance...
-- 
Andrew J. Templin, Confused Programmer, Ball State University
VAX: 00AJTEMPLIN@bsu-ucs.bsu.edu   ULTRIX: nosilla@bsu-cs.bsu.edu
"Ad Meorium Cthulhi Gloriam"            "Carpe Carp"
From: shane@cs.sunysb.edu (Shane Bouslough)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: /dev/lp & DELL 2.2
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:49:12 GMT
Organization: Dept of Computer Science, State U of NY at Stony Brook
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

I'm having a lot of trouble with DELL 2.2 and my HP IIP on a
parallel port. Using lp, files print but incredibly slowly. I
printed a .login file (about 700 bytes) and it took over half
an hour. The banner page came out after about 10 minutes. I
could see from the front panel of the HP that data started
reaching it immediately after the lp command.

Dell tech support walked me through a re-installation of the
printer and had me crimp the cable connectors to insure a
good ground... all with the expected results :-). We also
booted DOS and did a print-screen which worked perfectly.

Also, showcfg doesn't see the parallel port initially, but after
lp starts to print the file, it does (??).

My hardware:
	clone 486/50
	clone par/ser card.
	ATI Graphics Ultra
	Adaptec 1542

Any ideas?

-Shane

--
Shane Bouslough       | #include <stddisc.h>
shane@sbcs.sunysb.edu | #include <happy.rhodes>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: gryphon@openage.openage.com (The Golden Gryphon)
Subject: Re: starting X in SCO ODT
Organization: Open Age, Inc.
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 23:15:55 GMT

jka@windshear.larc.nasa.gov (J. Keith Alston) writes:


>Hi,
>  I'm running SCO ODT (not sure which version). When I attempt to
>  start the X window system, with startx, I get the following
>  message:
>   open event driver failed: no such file or directory

>  does anyone out there have any idea what might be causing
>  this problem?????

The mouse is not built into the kernel.  Try running "mkdev mouse".  Test the
mouse with "usemouse".  Then you'll be OK.

-- 
The Golden Gryphon 				gryphon@openage.COM
Solve a man's problem and he has 1 less.        No incumbents in 92.
"Mad Scientists seeks mindless brawny assistants, good pay, quite location."
Openage - The Premier SCO UNIX integrator in the Washington D.C. area
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us (Dave Ihnat)
Subject: Re: Dialup Passwords
Summary: Use crypt, or get dpasswd PD pgm.
Keywords: dialup passwords, 3B1, dpasswd
Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 22:05:34 GMT

In article <3059@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> nosilla@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Andrew J. Templin) writes:
>
>Ok.  I am looking through UNIX System Security by Farrow (1991), and
>I notice that System V R 3.2 has the ability to make a certain port 
>more secure via a dialup password.
> ...
>How do I set the password for this?  I can find nothing in the documentation
>(just like Farrow said), and I am at a loss on how to do this.

You can, as has been suggested, write a program using crypt.  If you don't have
crypt, you can do (crudely) the same thing by creating a dummy user, setting
the password, saving the encrypted string in the d_passwd file, and so on.

Or, you can get the dpasswd utility written, I believe, by Lenny Tropiano for
the 3B1.  It works just fine for other versions of Unix that support external
security passwords, and allows more mnemonic maintenance of the facility.
(Again, though, you need the security package to compile/link it.)

		Dave Ihnat
		ignatz@homebru.chi.il.us (preferred return address)
		ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: 120Mb tapes on SCO UNIX
Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745 
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 23:19:03 GMT

apl@world.std.com (Anthony P Lawrence) writes:

>Once the old 60M stuff is wiped off, they do work.

I always bulk erase all DC600A tapes before using them in a 150 meg drive..

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: marzusch@odiehh.hanse.de (Ralph-Diether Marzusch)
Subject: Re: Interactive SLIP with FAS drivers
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 00:22:29 GMT

wadswort@babss.UUCP (John H. Wadsworth) writes:

>In article <1992Nov4.123410.27544@wariat.org> zbig@wariat.org (Zbigniew J. Tyrlik) writes:
>>According to a tech from ISC/SunSoft, one cannot run SL/IP and NFS
>>at once  :-)  ( Please, do not tell it to my computer, I am
>>running it now). 
>>
>I think what he may have meant was you can't run NFS over a SL/IP
>line. I was once told "Don't even try it". That wouldn't stop me
>though, I just haven't gotten to it yet ;-) I suspect with some 
>tuning and a few magic incantations at least a read-only would work.

No, it's really true: the version of TCP and/or NFS(*) that came with 
ISC 2.2.1 wouldn't allow you to run NFS and SL/IP at the same time -
with any SL/IP line initialized all those NFS server processes (actually ANY
process using RPC) couldn't get contact to the portmapper (and therefore they
died shortly after having been started). However OUTGOING RPC access (access
to the portmapper on another system) was still possible. In fact I even
succeeded to mount and access another file system via a SL/IP line at 
2400 bit/s!

But don't even try such nonsense ... it seems to works, but it's far too slow
and may be dangerous if your modem doesn't have error control and if UDP comes
with checksums disabled (I don't know if this is the case with ISC's UDP).

Some good news: the latest versions of TCP (1.3) and/or NFS (don't remember
the version number) don't seem to have this "portmapper" bug.

- Ralph-Diether

(*) I don't know if this bug was related to TCP or NFS.
    Anyway: get the latest versions of both of them ...
-- 
Ralph-Diether Marzusch - Grosshansdorf, Germany
marzusch@odiehh.hanse.de - Voice/Fax: +49 4102 64193
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: sam@wa4phy.ampr.org (Sam Drinkard)
Subject: Help with named 
Organization: Unix Business Solutions
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 02:40:48 GMT

Fellow netters, I have a perplexing problem I could use some assistance
with.  I am attempting to successfully configure named on my system, and
for the most part, it works.  It does have a quirk that really is a pain
though.  Software is ISC 3.01 with patches, box is intel 486-33.  
Ok, here's the deal...

Running as an amateur radio tcp/ip nameserver for our local packet
network.  Have all the necessary files per the docs, BIND documents, etc.
This machine name is wa4phy.  If I use my local ka9q NOS box to request
any other host machines address that is in the database, it works fine.
If I place my own host name and address in the host database it causes
the domain suffix, which is ampr.org. to be appended _again_ to the 
local hosts name of wa4phy, so it comes out in mail headers as
wa4phy.ampr.org.ampr.org. , which just isn't gonna cut it.  One other 
quirk.. if I append the "." to host wa4phy, it does NOT add it, just like
it's supposed to.  If I eliminate the trailing "." it adds the double
suffix.  Another thing, when I query the nameserver for "wa4phy" it 
returns with host unknown.  Add the "." and same thing, but if I query
for "wa4phy." it works.  It's driving me nuts.   Have looked at the 
named_dump.db and there doesn't appear to be any errors in that, but I
am not experienced with the nameserver, so there could be and I just miss
it.

Here's a few lines from the hosts file..

@	IN	SOA	wa4phy.ampr.org. sam.wa4phy.ampr.org. (
			1.0	;serial
			3600	;refresh
			300	;retry
			3600000	;expire
			86400 )	;minimum
		IN	NS	wa4phy
localhost	IN	A	127.1
wa4phy-1.ampr.org.	IN	A	44.36.28.1
graves		IN	CNAME	wa4phy-1.ampr.org.
hs.wa4phy.ampr.org.	IN	A	44.36.28.2
gw.wa4phy.ampr.org.	IN	A	44.36.28.24
gate		IN	CNAME	gw.wa4phy.ampr.org.
pc.wa4bro.ampr.org.	IN	A	44.36.0.53
wb4tek.ampr.org.	IN	A	44.36.28.27

I've tried a FQDN type entry for "wa4phy", just "wa4phy" and "wa4phy."
The only one that works for host lookup is "wa4phy". As it stands now,
wa4phy isn't even in the host file, since all the local hosts know 
where it is, but still, the machine won't recognize itself :(

The named.boot, hosts.rev, localhosts, etc.. ALL the files are just as
described and exampled in the BIND documentation.

I don't have much hair now, but if I can't find why this stuff won't do
as I tell it to, I'll be bald in another week :)  

Sure would appreciate some of the experienced nameserver folks replys..

many thanks... sam

-- 
     Sam Drinkard	|	internet: wa4phy!sam@galois.nscf.org
     WA4PHY		|	internet: sam@wa4phy.nscf.nscf.org

Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: sh0002@medtronic.COM (Scott Hou)
Subject: AT&T User's Unite
Organization: Medtronic, Inc.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:15:12 GMT


I'm interested in finding out who uses AT&T Sys V/386, R 3.2 or above.
Is this still a supported product with lots of users??

--
Scott Hou                          phone: 612-574-8660
Consulting at Medtronic, Inc.      email: scott.hou@pace.medtronic.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386