HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: umwu0014@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Charles Bo Wu)
Subject: Re: NBC Commentators talking about China
Originator: umwu0014@pollux.cc.umanitoba.ca
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 04:33:23 GMT

In <1992Jul27.213259.29797@ctr.columbia.edu> yjj@prometheus.ctr.columbia.edu (Yuan Jiang) writes:

>I did.

>I can also tell you what methods are used in the athletic system.  I was in
>low level (part time) of the system for about 5 years.  10-15 year-old
>kids swam 4-7 km a day, 7days a week.  In winter, we swam in a pool,
>which was either too cold (17C degrees) or had too much chlorine (because
>the water was too dirty).  We did not have swimming gogles until many
>years later.

     What is wrong with those kids who swam 7 days a week? Nobody is
forcing them to swim if they don't like to. Yes, the temperature is cold,
the water is dirty, but if they don't like it, they can go home and play
something else. Besides, it is because they just can't afford to have clean
water every day, not because they don't want to swim in clean water. Can
you blame them?

>The pool was like a gas chamber with heavy chlorine.
 We swam with
>our eyes open.  We caughed all day because of the chlorine.  In summer,
>we swam in a lake to which a plastic palnt and a hospital nearby dumped their
>waste into.  The plant releases unbearible gas, which makes you vomit.

     It is your choice to swim in those pools. 

-- 

============================================================================
Charles Bo Wu                   Home #: 204-949-0721    Work #: 204-453-4444
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada      E-Mail: umwu0014@ccu.umanitoba.ca
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: chen@caen.engin.umich.edu (Jian Chen)
Subject: Re: Question for Shi Chunde
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 15:51:05 EDT
Organization: Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

In article <1992Jul27.164312.2040@oakhill.sps.mot.com> kenw@austlcm.sps.mot.com writes:
>
>(1) Lincoln was a president - are you? 

I am not the president of China now. As the president of China must
be one of Chinese, I surely have the chance to be the president of
China. Excluding people who are disqualified for the
presidency and people who have permanent foreign residency, the
chance for me is more than 1 per billion.

>
>(2) Lincoln was elected by people from the north as well as the south - are 
>    chinese who want to punish TIer's elected by Taiwanese?

Lincoln was elected by people in USA not by the north or the south.
As a matter of fact, he did not win in many southern states.

>
>(3) The purpose of Lincoln's Civil War was to free the slaves from the south -
>    what is the rulers of the blue ants want to do with Taiwanese?

The Civil War of United States was to defend the integration of this
country. This has been a well known fact in the world.

>
>(4) Lincoln was assasinated after the Civil War - are you willing to follow the
>    same path?

If the unification of China needs me to sacrafice my life like President
Lincoln, I have no hasitation to do so. I will be proud of it because 
I know I will be memorized by Chinese people like President Lincoln be 
memorized by American people.

>
>(5) Lincoln was a great President in the US history - are you?
>

Please ask this question after I become the president of China. The chance
for me to be the president of China is so small now. It is meanless to
answer this question.

>(6) America was a unified country before the Civil War - are Taiwan (ROC) and 
>    China (prc) the same country?  
>
>TIer's are not trying to sepatrate your country. In fact, they don't even want to
>deal with your country. They are dealing with the KMT.
>

Taiwan is a part of China based on Cairo Decleration, Postsdam Agreement, San 
Francisco Treat and Sino-Japan 1972 agreement. All of the documents are well
registered in the United Nations.

The civil war does not change the status of Taiwan just like the civil war in
United States does not change the status of southern states. China has the legal
claim on the territory Taiwan. Chinese people has all of the legal rights on 
the territory Taiwan.


J Chen
Department of Chemistry
University of Michigan
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Friday, 31 Jul 1992 14:15:41 CDT
From: <U21885@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Complain NBC phone Number

 Complain NBC ?
Call (212) 664-4444 to express your anger.
From: jamesou@ZYGOTE.HSC.USC.EDU (James Ou)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Three Ladies Walk Together ...
Date: 22 Jul 92 16:39:16 GMT

lix@BUCRSB.BU.EDU wrote:

>"Yi2 Ri4 Wei2 Shi1, Zhong1 Sheng1 Wei2 Fu4" applies only to some religions
>or trades where masters are not paid by students (or their parents).

We have a disagreement here. :-) I don't think "Shi" here is
limited to religion or business or Kung Fu masters. :-)  This
reminds me of a story about a guy in Chinese history whom I have
forgot his name. He together with his 9 familiies (9 Zu2) was
sentenced to death by the emperor. Before his execution, he
yelled to the emperor, "I am not afraid of death, even if you
execute my ten-family relatives (Yi2 Shi2 Zu2)." Well, in
ancient China, there were only nine families of relatives (Jiu3
Zu2). So, the angry emperor collected all this poor guy's
students and considered them the tenth family (Di4 Shi2
Zu2) of this guy.

According to the definition of Confucius, however, a teacher was
defined as:

     Shi1 Zhe3, Suo3 Yi3 Chuan2 Dao4, Shou4 Ye4, Jie3 Huo4 Zhe3
     Ye3.
     (Teachers are the people who teach knowledge and skills, and
      answer questions.)

Here I translate Dao4 to knowledge. But Dao here perhaps means
everything including literature, ethics, philosophy, etc.

> It
>does not apply to the relation of teacher/students in sense of Confucianist
>scholars, for whom "Si" is an employee, though respectable one.

"Si" [_sic_] is an employee? This sounds like the American
definition of teachers, except that the teachers in the U.S. are
not respected.  :-)


>>****Confucius said, "Wen2 Dao4 You3 Xian1 Hou4, Shu4 Ye4 You3
><Zhuan1 Gong1."
>
>This is from Dr. Han, but a classical definition of "Si" in mainstream
>Confucianism.

Are you sure? Since I am also pretty sure that Confucius said
this, so, if we are both correct, then Dr. Han must have stolen
this statement from his great grand teacher. After all, Han Fei
Zi's teacher "Xun2 Kuang4" was the student of Confucius' grandson
(Kong3 Yu2)(?). :-)
From: jialin@dogwood.botany.uga.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: My feelings
Date: 29 Jul 92 19:28:26 GMT
Organization: Botany Department - U of Georgia, Athens

In article <9207291603.AA13044@> Tuya@ccmail.uoregon.edu writes:
>
>             I am most proud of the fact that Chinese also win medals
>          in almost purely physical things like swimming.  In the past
>          I only trusted on chinese brains and chinese food, not
>          limbs.  So this is really a boost of confidence!  I vow I am
>          going to start swimming, too!  At least I can beat a couple
>          of high school drop-outs.

Swimming is not pure physical at all. You will know after you
start swimming.
 
>             IMHO, we chinese is at a point where we need mostly
>          cow-boy kind of people instead of Jia3 baoyu kind of people.
>          What do you think?  

You are finally start making some sense. :-)   Down with HLM. :-) :-)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: zzuo@iastate.edu (Zhiqi Zuo)
Subject: Re: NBC olympic coverage
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 21:41:23 GMT

In article <1992Jul29.194509.14162@rigel.econ.uga.edu> jialin@dogwood.botany.uga.edu writes:
>In article <1992Jul29.165030.> dethomas@athena.mit.edu (Drea E Thomas) writes:
>>Just another note on NBC's appalling coverage of the olympics,
>....
>> In the swimming events this pattern is just as bad. In one
>>race (womens, 200 m breaststroke??) in which a chinese athelete
>>got the silver medal, they never even showed her (in closeup)
>>I never even saw her face. The american who won the bronze medal
>>was profiled and interviewed extensively.
>
>At the 400meter relay, the Chinese team was in the front until last
>10-15 meters, but they never gave a close up. 

China has a lot of items comparable with US in this GAMES, which may
accounts for the more excessive belittlement of the excellent
chinese athletates.
 
>> If you want to complain to NBC, the number was given earlier
>>(212-664-4444).
From: leslie@bios.botany.uga.edu (Yuan JI)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: San1 Mao2's books
Date: 29 Jul 92 15:45:57 GMT
Organization: Botany Department - U of Georgia, Athens

In article <1992Jul29.132508.23782@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> hl2a@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Haiyan  Liu) writes:
>In article <1992Jul28.203757.29535@nic.umass.edu> s9874203@titan.ucc.umass.edu (s9874203) writes:
>
>>First of all, welcome back to scc, Ms.Liu. I sincerely hope you come
>>back with your health problem cured because this thread might not go on
>>nicely (i.e. it might be harmful to your health.)
>
>Thank you for remembering my health. :-o   My WBC is back to normal 
>according to the blood check of last week.  So I am healthy now.  Thank
>you.
>
>>Now let me point out some misunderstanding in your post:
>>1. I didn't say San Mao's books are junk. What I said is:
>>       Qiong Yao's books are drugs, so to speak, while San Mao's books
>>       are not worse than junk.
>>   By that I meant QY's books are harmful while SM's books are not worse
>>   than something harmless but valueless.
>>2. I said QY's books are drugs because (I think) they are addictive AND
>>   creating quite a few daydreamers. Of course, "drug" might not be an
>>   appropriate word for that.
>>3. I have stated clearly why I don't like San Mao's books in the previous
>>   post (see above what you quoted) (OK, I said she is kinda making fuss
>>   of nothing in her books. But you are free to call this "feature" xi4
>>   ni4.) 
>
>OK, that is your opinion.  Everybody is entitled his/her own opinion.
>
>>Finally, some tips for you: don't jump to conclusion and don't be too
>>sensitive to any comments about women.
>
>Thank you for your advise.  I cannot help mentioning that I got a message 
>critisizing San Mao to have a Westerner husband.
>
>BTW, what was San Mao's English name, Echo?  And where can I get her books 
>in US and are there English version of her books?  I did not finish all her
>books in in China and would like to read the beautiful books.

You can find Sha Mao's book in Bookstores selling chinese book, I know the
the chinese book store in Atlanta area carrys San Mao's books as well as
other writers like Qiong Yao , Yu li Hua.        

You can also order chinese book from "Willis book" in California, I used to
order books from them, but I lost their 800 number. Someone please kindly
post their 800 numbers in the net.

Yuan
From: huangzh@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Andy Huang)
Subject: Re: Steriods. (was Re: Chicago Tribune: How Zhuang won gold medal) 
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 10:29:28 GMT

Please understand that here I am not to accuse anyone using anything.  But
please don't be too surprised if you have a good friend who graduated
(or got an MS degree) from BeiJingTiYuXueYuan and works as scientist in 
Guo2Jia1 Ti3Yu4 Ke1Yan2 Suo3 or as a trainer with a women's national 
(cycling, T&F, swimming, skating...etc.) team, and he/she happens to tell
you in a casual tone (you're good friends, right?) how those athletes are
scheduled for their diet, training sessions, their periods, ... don't be
too surprised if you hear how their muscles are developed, don't be too 
surprised if your friend happens to know Ye QiaoBo (or some other 
unfortunate ones who just got caught but never known by the public) and 
tells you what actually happened.  Don't be too surprised when your 
friend tell you why in many sports that require muscle strength Chinese
girls did much better than guys (how many women's weightlifting world 
records are held by Chinese?). Don't be surprised when your friend tells 
you that in China AND MANY SPORT POWERHOUSE COUNTRIES there're scientists
who work their butt off to find a way to NOT GET CAUGHT --all in the name
of Ti3Yu4 Ke1Yan2........ Remember, sterois is only one of few drugs that
listed in the test and there're tons of others out there which are "better
for certain purposes", and there're tons of "scientists" all over the world.
Unfortunately the fact in the 90's seems to be that there is much more
BEHIND THE CAMERA than before, and if you're caught, you're just an unlucky 
SOB that everybody would laugh at, but if you get away with it, well.....do
we need to say more?
--Andy



-- 
=============================== Andy Huang <huangzh@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
P.S. Thank you for reading my article. We may not share the same idea but I 
respect whatever thoughts you may have. Please feel free to agree/disagree, 
to laugh/criticize/protest. Or to use "kill", s'il vous plait.
Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:20830 soc.culture.taiwan:11167 soc.culture.hongkong:9166
From: mikemo@bullwinkle.Tymnet.COM (Mike Mo)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: News of Taiwan
Summary: news
Keywords: new law to expand ties with mainland, landslide, DDP scandals
Date: 23 Jul 92 16:17:59 GMT
Followup-To: soc.culture.china
Distribution: usa
Organization: BT North America (Tymnet)


  Channel 38, SF Bay area Chinese News


** ROC Passes New Law to Expand Ties with mainland China (7-18-92)  **

Li-Fay Yuan  had preliminary passed a law to expand the economic and culture 
tie to mainland China.  Final appoval will depends on PROC's reponse and
how KMT and DDP's compromise.

Direct trade and direct transportation were permit in this new law, where
before it was only when PROC have to renounce their "use of force", ROC then
will allow such measure to be implemented.

CCP members will also allowed to enter Taiwan, as this new law put in effect.

PROC officer in charge of Taiwan affair repudiate this passage of law, saying
Taiwan has no right (fay3 Tung3) to do it (7/21).

** Land Slide in Hsin Chu (60 miles from Taipei), 6 Killed  **

A section of highway connecting Hsin Chu and Chu Tung (east of Hsin Chu) had
collapsed due to underwater or water pipe leakage.  15 people lived nearby
were buried in the mud, 6 among then were killed. (7-20)
Latest new were reporting that the victims' family may try to suit Taiwan
Highway Bureau according to "National Compesation Law"(7/22).

** Taiwan fishboat smuggled hundreds of mainlander illegal immigrant to USA **

Quite a few captains and their crews were facing justice in Taiwan for helping
hundreds of mailand Chinese to illegally entering USA.   Some were collecting
as high as $30,000 USA dollar per person for this smuggling operation.

**  Vote Bribery on DDP's primary scandals get deepen **

Shi Min-Der,  one of the DDP's heavy weight, does not want to comment on the
bribery inside their party for the primary vote concerning this year end 
Li-Fay Yuan legislator election.  Shi said" It is too sensative to talk about".

TV commentator sees as friction get worsen, may eventullay split this new
party to two. (7/22)

(~)/~)/~)    (~)/~)/~)         | mikemo@tymnet.com
 /  /  /      /  /  / /~~)     | San Jose, CA. USA
/  /  (_ o   /  /  (_(__/      | Just another Chinese in Silicon Valley
Disclaimer: My opinions are my own.  Copyleft 1992
Drink Taiwan Beer, and listen to Tsai Chin's old song,  that's life :-)





Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: zhu@cs.UAlberta.CA (Zhu Yuchen)
Subject: Re: Lin Li won gold in 200 IM
Organization: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 19:03:55 GMT

byang@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu (Bin Yang) writes:

>	Lin Li has won a gold medal in women's 200 IM with a new world 
>record. 
Is this her third medal in Bacelona? I guess she is just another 
swimming robot (or machine) with no interesting facial expression after
winning all these medals. 
>| USA's Summer Sanders won a silver.
Oh, my little poor American sweety,
I love watching your smile and ... Who cares who gets the Gold.
:-)(
--

===
Zhu Yuchen, Edmonton
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: jpxu1@fnalf.fnal.gov
Subject: Re: Steriods. (was Re: Chicago Tribune: How Zhuang won gold medal)
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:31:55 GMT

In article <1992Jul30.164939.27637@ctr.columbia.edu>, yjj@janus.ctr.columbia.edu (Yuan Jiang) writes:
> In article <1992Jul29.012550.2673@objy.com> cw@orion.uucp (C.W. Chung) writes:
>>    In article <Bs3u8v.Iv4@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
>>    >In article <1992Jul28.144525.24505@athena.mit.edu> zhuh@athena.mit.edu (Hui Zhu) writes:
>>(By the way, WSJ is probably the best and less-biased major US publication when
>>it comes to international affairs.)  The 3 medalist and the fourth competitor
>>have to go through drug testing.  The athelete has to come out with a urine
>>sample within an hour under the direct monitoring of a nurse or a doctor,
>>and within an hour, a special envoy is assigned to escort the athelete and
>>make sure the athelete is in sight all the time.  The identity of urine sample 
> You are talking about Olympic track and Field.  Olympic swimming only
> does random drug test.

And it's a result of US's heavy lobby.  They were afraid of their top players
being caught in later 70's and early 80's.
Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:20801 soc.culture.hongkong:9150
From: ylq@lems23lems.brown.edu (Yan Shen)
Subject: Re: China in Olympics.
Organization: Laboratory for Engineering Man/Machine Systems
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 21:20:52 GMT

In article <Bs0Ew6.EF2@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
|> Newsgroups: rec.sport.olympics
|> >From: rswiftrw@cc.curtin.edu.au (Rod Swift)
|> Subject: SWIMFINAL: Result-W's 100m Freestyle
|> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 15:15:43 GMT
|> 
|> SWIMMING - Women's 100m Freestyle Final
|> =======================================
|>  
|> World Record		54.48
|> Olympic Record		54.69
|> 
|>  
|> Gold	ZHUANG, Yong		CHN	54.64	<-- New Olympic Record
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
this makes me feel great today, thanks for posting.

|> Silver	THOMPSON, J		USA	54.84
|> Bronze	VAN ALMSICK, Francisca	GER	54.94
|> ------
|> 4	HAISLETT, N		USA	55.19
|> 5	PLEWINSKI, Catalin	FRA	55.72
|> 6	JINGYI, Le		CHN	55.89
|> 7	OSYGUS, Simone		GER
|> 8	BRIENESSE, Karin	NED
|>  
|> 
|> ** Results complete **
|>  
|> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 16:32:15 GMT
|> 
|> SWIMMING - Women's 400m Individual Medley Final
|> =================================================
|> 
|> World Record		4:36.10
|> Olympic Record		4:36.29
|>  
|> Gold	EGERSZEGI, Kristina	HUN	4:36.54
|> Silver	LI, Lin 		CHN	?
|> Bronze	SANDERS, Summer		USA	?
|> ------
|> 4	LEWIS, Hayley		AUS	?
|> 
|> Placings Unknown... (News feed down again!)
|> Lane 1	HUNGER, Daniela		GER
|> Lane 2	KIMURA, Eri		JPN
|> Lane 6	SYNOWSKA, Ewa		POL
|> Lane 8	HIRANAKA, Hireko	JPN
|>  
|> 
|> ** This message will be reposted when complete **
|>  
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: mzhao@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Min Zhao)
Subject: Re: Three Ladies Walk Together ... (Was Re: Recent Research)
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 17:36:17 GMT

In article <13600@mindlink.bc.ca> Sanyee_Tang@mindlink.bc.ca (Sanyee Tang) writes:
>
>    If one person must be good enough to be your teacher when three walk
>together, then one lady should be good enough to be your teacher when three
>get together.  Because the order of respectables in China is Heaven, Earth,
>CCP Emperor, Teacher and Family Members, the lady good enough to be your
>teacher must be good enough to be your wife.  It is just that simple.
>
 
    Sanyee seems to deliberately change the order of the last two. Isn't it
"Tian, Di, Jun, Qing, Si" ?    And the Qing doesn't refer to wife , it refers
to parents. 
   Now, is Sanyee really one of those Lao Ren as referred to in the recent
SCC "girl talks", who is doing everything possible to encourage matching and
mating of the young and restless, oops, I mean lifeless, oops again, I mean
wifeless, oops, to be politically correct, I mean wifeless or husbandless ?
Sanyee's effort, to the extent of distorting old teachings, is obvious. 
   Now, you young people listen to Sanyee, instead wasting your time on
SCC to seek attention and satisfaction, please seek happiness around you
or, as many do, back in China in your home town. 
  
   You all have to appreciate Sanyee's "Liang Ku Yong Xin". 
 

This is from Joe, not Min Zhao
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: s9874203@titan.ucc.umass.edu (s9874203)
Subject: Re: San1 Mao2's books
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 20:37:57 GMT

In article <1992Jul28.185228.27911@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> hl2a@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Haiyan  Liu) writes:
>>I would like to share my opion about San Mao's books: I don't like them

> I wrote:
>
>>either. I read her Sahara Desert and a couple of other books and got
>>tired of them soon. IMO, San Mao is a little bit shen2 jing1 xi1 xi1
>>(making fuss of nothing) (at least in her books). Her writing is
>>completely woman-style (literally), 
>>but different from that of another woman
>>novelist Qiong2 Yao2 in Taiwan. Qiong2 Yao2's books are drugs, so to
>>speak, while San Mao's books are not worse than junk.
>
>
>Because you don't like their novels, you label them as junk and drug?
>Or because they are women, you don't feel like to read wommen's books?
>I liked and still like both San Mao's and Qiong Yao's books.  I feel
>very bad that I waited on the West Lake in Hangzhou but did not meet San
>Mao when she was visiting Hangzhou.  I feel very sorry that I would never
>have a chance to see her.
>

First of all, welcome back to scc, Ms.Liu. I sincerely hope you come
back with your health problem cured because this thread might not go on
nicely (i.e. it might be harmful to your health.)

Now let me point out some misunderstanding in your post:
1. I didn't say San Mao's books are junk. What I said is:
       Qiong Yao's books are drugs, so to speak, while San Mao's books
       are not worse than junk.
   By that I meant QY's books are harmful while SM's books are not worse
   than something harmless but valueless.
2. I said QY's books are drugs because (I think) they are addictive AND
   creating quite a few daydreamers. Of course, "drug" might not be an
   appropriate word for that.
3. I have stated clearly why I don't like San Mao's books in the previous
   post (see above what you quoted) (OK, I said she is kinda making fuss
   of nothing in her books. But you are free to call this "feature" xi4
   ni4.) 

Finally, some tips for you: don't jump to conclusion and don't be too
sensitive to any comments about women.

Enjoy.


Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: jiang@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu (Fenglai Jiang)
Subject: Re: test
Organization: University of Engineering, College of Engineering
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 01:16:55 GMT

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: lix@BUCRSB.BU.EDU
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Three Ladies Walk Together ... (Was Re: Recent Research)
Date: 21 Jul 92 14:13:36 GMT

Sanyee Tang wrote:
>Probably every Chinese student knows Dr. Johnny's famous line, "three
persons walk together, one must be good enough to be my teacher (Wo3 Shi1)."
Unfortunately, few of them follow Dr. Johnny's wisdom when they face one
of the most critical decisions in their lives -- how to get a wife.  This
betrayal of Chinese "family values" brings endless unhappy whinings to SCC
"girl talk" :-).  Men, it is the time to Wen1 Gu4 Er2 Zhi1 Xin1 (review Old
Dr. Johnny's teaching and attain to new wisdom)!

No, your revisionist view has been wisely foreseen by Dr. Johnny. After
a brief discussion with me, he called Dr. Cang who was in charge of making
characters. "Hi, Lao Cang, please make three Nuu together a bad word!"

Nowaday, it seems nobody knows why three Nuu is a bad word, I myself almost
forgot this episode, time and tide never wait...
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china