From: kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley)
Subject: Re: b r a w l e y withdraws? (was Re: A question for any MALE prolifer)
Organization: Liebe Company
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 06:41:14 GMT

keegan@kazoo.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:

>in a demonstration of just how fast the net can overcome someone,
>kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) rages:
>-> keegan@scoobiedoo.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
>-> >in a post devoid of reason, kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) writes:
>-> >-> keegan@kazoo.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
>-> >-> >kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) rants to muriel:
>-> >-> >-> Standard Pro-Death tactics is to scream their opinion
>-> >-> >-> while trying to shut others out.
>-> >-> 
>-> >-> >it's odd you'd say that. i don't believe i've ever heard
>-> >-> >a single "Pro-Death" person scream. no doubt, this is
>-> >-> >because i don't know any "Pro-Death" people, which is
>-> >-> >also odd. because i've been around this newsgroup a long,
>-> >-> >long time while you have just arrived.  still, you
>-> >-> >deserve the benefit of the doubt i suppose.  so, please
>-> >-> >list the name of the people you call "Pro-Death" along
>-> >-> >with some evidence that they are "Pro-Death." then we can
>-> >-> >move on to this screaming business.  once you take care
>-> >-> >of this wee matter, i'm sure any questions as to your
>-> >-> >integrity will be answered.
>-> >-> 
>-> >-> Glad to oblige.  
>-> >-> 
>-> >-> 1. The fetus (human or not) is a life.
>-> 
>-> >human or not? are you proposing some protection for mammals,
>-> >plants, viruses, fish, insects, cancer......
>-> 
>-> I'm devoid of reason?  You have refuted nothing.  The issue,
>-> bonehead, is abortion of human fetus'.  The parenthetical
>-> phrase was in deference to twits like yourself.  (human or
>-> not)

>well then sonny, rewrite your phrase and resubmit it written in
>such a way that it clearly represents what you want to say.

>-> >-> 2. When you terminate the life you bring death.
>-> 
>-> >-> 3. Hence people wanting the ability to bring death (ie.
>-> >-> so-called Pro-Choicers) are Pro-Death.
>-> 
>-> >have you had your tonsils removed sonny?
>-> >have you ever had a haircut, trimmed your fingernails?
>-> >you'd better try again.
>-> >and don't forget to include your list of names this time.
>-> 
>-> Well, seems your whole post is nonsense (since you couldn't
>-> even comprehend the premise).

>i take it then that you shall be withdrawing your nonsense which
>began this discussion; that is this nonsensical statement:

>	"Standard Pro-Death tactics is to scream their opinion
>	while trying to shut others out."

>don't feel too bad kid. people like you pop into t.a. a couple of
>times each year. most don't last.

Here is a prime example of the difference between the Life/Choice
sides of the issue.  I have proven my points time and again with
LOGIC.  This post is what I get in response.

Since you haven't followed all the debate I'll give you the idea
of the meaning of the quote you took out of context.

"Standard" as in "Typical"
"Pro-Death" as in "Pro-Choice" "
"tactics" as in "strategy"
"scream their opinion" as in "promote their ill-conceived ideas" 
"shut others out" as in "attempting to rid the group of people who disagree"

So:  Typical Pro-Choice strategy is to promote their ill-conceived ideas
     while trying to rid the group of people who disagree.

Is it justified?  This was in response to a couple of pro-deathers
telling me it would be better if I didn't post any more.  Now, you
can retract, asshole.

profamilyprochildrenpromarriageprolifeproGodprounbornbabiespromeateatingpro
animalresearchprohuntingpromen     Kevin     prowomenprosocraticmethodhence
prointellectproamericanbutalso    Brawley    proqualityprolowertaxesprohome
schoolingprostrongdefenseprocharitybutnotprosocialistwelfarestateproliberty