HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Playoffs/the final answer/the Cowboys.
Date: 30 Dec 92 00:34:27 GMT

In article <kfEBxfG00WDKQFllhm@andrew.cmu.edu>, vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu (Vernon H Harmon) writes:
> Excerpts from netnews.rec.sport.football.pro: 28-Dec-92 Playoffs/the
> final answer/t.. John@admin1.memst.edu (4838)
> 
> > Backup quarterbacks usually don't get the job done, and this should be
> > the case for San Diego.  Kansas City's defense should get the job done
> > on the backup QB this week.
> 
> Gagliano may be the backup, but he was the starter for the first few
> weeks of the season--yeah, those were the games SD lost, but *nobody* on
> the offense was really producing then....Humphries just helped
> everything click. 


By the way it is going, I would say that Humphries might start on Sat. His
shoulder is responding very well to treatment. The good thing is that the
injury is not in his throwing shoulder.

Gagliano started the first game vs. KC and was pulled after that. Humphries 
started from game 2 onwards. I can't blame the 1st loss to KC on Gagliano
alone. Nobody on the team was playing well; receivers were dropping passes,
the special teams let in a punt return for a TD early on in the game, etc.
And still SD was in the game till the middle of the 4th Q. This is a different
SD team that KC will face. This is a team with a lot of confidence and number
of weapons.


> Also note that while KC has the #1 (I believe) passing
> defense, they are about #26 in rushing defense, and with Butts, Bienemy,
> Bernstine and Harmon SD is no slouch in the rushing dept! 


KC played a 4-1-6 scheme last Sunday to beat Denver (4 linemen, 1 LB, 6 DBs). 
By flooding the secondary, the receivers were not open and this forced Elway 
into sacks/INTs. That defense worked only because Denver has NO running game.
SD is a different team in that they can pass *and* run the ball very well. 
The Giants showed 2 weeks ago how you can run on the Chiefs and SD will 
be looking to expolit that.


> San Diego needs
> this game to get any kind of credibility at all and a little respect
> from fans around the league--since Denver ended up 8-8 SD didn't beat a
> single team over .500 this year and this is their third shot at KC. The
> third time should be the charm.
> 
> --Vernon.


Yeah.. SD needs to win a playoff game to get more respect. BTW, they did beat
a > .500 team in Indianapolis (9-7), twice. Take away those two losses to SD,
Indy is 9-5, having beaten Buff and Mia once.



_______________________________________________________
| Prashanth                    |                      |
| U. of California @ San Diego | prash@raman.ucsd.edu |
#######################################################
From: fzorn@luna.dpl.scg.hac.com (Frank Zorn)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: MNF: Joey's Return
Date: 22 Dec 92 15:56:08 GMT
Organization: Hughes Aircraft Co., El Segundo, CA


Vern, Vern, Vern.  It's all right!  Tell us, were you severely beaten as a
youth by your father while he had on a 9er #16 jersey?  Tell us all about
your childhood.

I'm not even a 49er fan,  but maybe you could share with us some of your
insights into Joe's lack of character, and what this could possibly have
to do with football?

And tell us, who is your fav team and player?  Enlighten us further.
From: dsj@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Daniel Scott Janecek)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: RE: Bad Boy Green Bay Bob
Date: 31 Dec 1992 19:19:30 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Reply-To: dsj@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: dsj@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

From article <19921228.091928.623@almaden.ibm.com>, by heavy-metal@vnet.ibm.com:
> 
	Well now, while I listen to complain about 'select' Viking
fans, and 'every nice' Green Bay fans, my mind drifts to a game I went
to against GB and Minn at Milwaukee County Stadium. Being a Viking fan
from Milwaukee, I wore my colors admist a LARGE group of Packer fans,
and to tell you the truth, if all that happened to you was several
verbal insults, you should be GLAD. I had to leave that game BEFORE
the final minute due to some threats made to me from Packer fans. Just
as you said, these were SELECT Packer fans, but from your thread, you
are trying to persuade everyone that Viking fans are a**holes, and
Packer fans ARE ALL great, not true. There are some A**HOLE Pack fans,
just as there are some F***ED up Viking fans. Hell, its only a game,
why should I get threatened because I support the other team (AND THE
PACK WON!). I have upmost respect for the Packer fans, THEY ARE THE
BEST IN FOOTBALL- LISTEN UP VIKING FANS!! I have been to both games,
and the Packer fans are ALWAYS cheering. Hell, I saw in the paper
today that The Vikes didn't sell out the Metrodome yet for the Skins
game- A MAJOR DISSAPOINTMENT! Packer games are ALWAYS a sellout (with
MAYBE one esxception a year). Given their lack of success recently,
this is LOYALTY! I seldom hear Packer fans booing their team, while
the Vikings fans seem to boo at every blown play, OH WELL, maybe The
Viking fans (including me) can learn something from Packer fans..

> 
>  Green Bay Bob
>  Proud to be a Packer Fan
>  (and I will let you know that even though I live in a Minnesota and am
>  surrounded by Viking fans, I'm wearing my beautiful Green Bay sweatshirt
>  and jacket. And I'm making the rounds. I love my team.)

	DAn
	PROUD VIKING FAN living in Milwaukee admist Packer fans
wearing my colors....
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M)
Subject: Re: AFC vs. NFC drivel
Reply-To: dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 19:18:55 GMT

In article <184743@pyramid.pyramid.com> glambert@pyramid.com (George Lambert) writes:
>The Niners, in the last decade, are better than ANYBODY.  First team in
>NFL history with 10 or more wins per season for 10 consecutive years.  Four
>Superbowl wins.  Best QB of the decade.  Best WR of the decade.  Best road
>game winning percentage of the decade.

Let's add: better road game winning percentage since 1981 than ANY team's
home game winning percentage, best December winning percentage (36-6)
than any team, more post-season wins since 1981, only team in NFL history
to win 14+ regular season games more than twice (1984, 1989, 1990, 1992),
only team to ever go 8-0 on the road during a season (1984, 1989, 1990).

>
>Gary and Ed can carry on with their discourse on the conferences...I don't
>care because the Niners have been the best team period in recent memory.  The 
>other 27 teams were mere fodder :-)

Course, the Redskins were in 4 SB themselves, winning 3 of them. :-)

>
>One could go on with this, but I won't.  Hopefully the Niners will.

Yeah.  One loss in the playoffs and who gives a damn about all those
regular season stats! :-)
>
>Happy New Year one and all, and best wishes to ALL the teams that made the 
>playoffs.
>
>George Lambert
>GO NINERS!!!   PEAT!!!!
From: evans@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Doug Evans - CIT Network Operations)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Hey Ed Lor, Bills 4-0 vs NFC, one more NFC team to beat
Date: 21 Dec 92 21:16:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <3181@devnull.mpd.tandem.com>, dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch) writes...
>In article <BzLBCD.A1q@acsu.buffalo.edu> v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:
>>This game down to which defense was
>>better, and the Bills showed that they were the better
>>defense
> 
>If you really believe this, you ignorance of what defense means is staggering.

Gee Dan, why don't you enlighten us as to what a defense means? I thought
it had something to do with preventing the other team from scoring, 
especially in a clutch game, on the road and with 3 pro-bowlers on the
sideline, but I could be wrong.

Did you watch the game Dan? The Bills D limited the Saints running game
to 48 yards. Ironhead Heyward was stuffed all day long. The Bills D
totally dominated the second half.  On the other hand, the Saints D
opened up well enough in the second half (and made some crucial mistakes
) that the struggling Bills O was able to put more points on the board
than the Saints O had. I think that's what it's all about.  But then
again Dan, we know you must have more knowledge of these things.

Oh wait, that's right. The Bills aren't an NFC team therefore they
can't possibly have a decent defense. Sure...that's it, just ask
Ed Lor, he'll tell ya.


Doug

                                  |                              Doug Evans
                                  | State University of New York at Buffalo
                                  |             evans@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson)
Subject: Re: Jills had their ass kicked
Reply-To: bergerson@mayo.edu
Organization: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 16:22:54 GMT


In article <Bzz3oC.D2H@acsu.buffalo.edu>, kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) writes:
->From: kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist)
->Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
->Subject: Re: Jills had their ass kicked
->
->In article <1992Dec28.072502.18765@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:
->>In article <BzyFJB.5zo@acsu.buffalo.edu> kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) writes:
->>>What the hell's the deal with that stupid subject line? Can't you ever say
->>>anything intelligent? (that was a rhetorical question)
->>
->>>
->>Ah HA, sounds like a whiner here! How about the Buffalo Bills
->>were soundly beat by a superior Defense and a 2nd string QB?
->>Or how about Machine Gun Kelly was injured and the Bills fell
->>apart? No?! Hmmmm, how about Glenn has three INTs and Del Rio
->>and company thoroughly beat (not kick ASS) the Bills. Anyway
->>you want to interpret it, the Bill LOST! 
->
->How about, the Oilers beat a Buffalo team without four pro bowlers
->(Cornelius Bennett, Bruce Smith, Jim Kelly, and Steve Tasker)? Or, how
->about the Oilers won against a second string QB?
->
Quit crying, the bills choked and lost, and now the Miami Dolphins are
the AFC East Champions.  To all the Bills fans who endlessly went on and on
and on and on about "The Bet" or whatever the hell it was, you can all eat
shit.

--
*******************************************************************************
Chad D. Bergerson                            Internet: bergerson@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic                                  Voice: (507) 255-7567
200 First Street SW                          FAX: (507) 255-5484
Mail Stop 2D-334 STM            "In my dream I was drowning my sorrows  
Rochester, MN  55905             But my sorrows they learned to swim..." - U2
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Re: Vikes KILL the Pack
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date: 28 DEC 92 11:42:32    

In article <1992Dec28.105900.23045@hemlock.cray.com>, kak1@birch02.cray.com (Kevin Kramer) writes...

> 
>In article <1992Dec28.153029.25827@macc.wisc.edu>, heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>> 
>> The way I got it figured, the score is at least 7-0 in Packer fan's 
>> favor as far as showing class goes.
>> 
>> JGH
> 
>Now I have seen everything!!  I expected the pak fans to feel a little sorry
>for themselves, but this is just silly.

Well, you deleted the part where Packer fans were ripped.  There's 
nothing wrong with defending yourself from attacks like this.

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Roger Craig on George Seifert
Date: 22 Dec 92 22:35:32 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

>>>In article <29710117@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM> garyr@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM (Gary Rosen) writes:
>>>>>(walid al-sabah) /  9:43 am  Dec 18, 1992 /
>>>>>From the L.A. Times of Thursday 12/17/92
>>>>
>>>>>	Overrated? Even though San Francisco  49er Coach George   Seifert
>>>>>	has a 54-3 record, including a Super Bowl victory in 1990, former
>>>>>	running back  Roger  Craig  isn't that impressed  with  Seifert's
>>>>>	accomplishments.

This is about the tenth bizillionth time I've seen this, and wonder that
no one else is wondering at it.  How in the heck does Seifert supposedly
have a 54-3 record, when the 49ers were 10-6 last year alone?

Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
Subject: The FAT LADY IS SINGING in BUFFALO!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 19:15:22 GMT

current score:  Oilers  35  Bills  3

Moon and company are in total control of this game.
Does anyone want a play by play?

-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller
From: kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Dan Reeves firing
Date: 28 Dec 92 22:51:16 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: what.. me.. organized?


Dan Reeves is an excellent coach who took mediocre teams (+ 1 great QB)
to the 3 SB. Unless the Broncos management thinks that its time for a 
change in leadership, sort of shake things up, they are making a mistake.

Expect Reeves name to show up for the NYG job. The only problem there 
might be a power struggle between Young and Reeves.


_______________________________________________________
| Prashanth                    |                      |
| U. of California @ San Diego | prash@raman.ucsd.edu |
#######################################################
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: asj4j@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (JonaX)
Subject: REDSKINS LOOSE! YES!
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 00:01:56 GMT

YES YES YES YES YES!!!!!!!  The REDSKINS LOST TO THE RAIDERS BY 
ONE POINT (21-20)!  I LOVE IT!  All Redskins fans are welcome
to flame me.... It'll just make it all sooooo much sweeter!
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Aikman a weakness?!? (was Re: It wasn't Pretty (49ers WON))
Date: 23 Dec 92 21:25:21 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Dec23.201838.4176@ods.com> richard@ods.com (Richard Thompson) writes:
>In article <1992Dec22.155317.11678@hellgate.utah.edu> twolf@cs.utah.edu (Tom Wolf) writes:
|: He has been there for 4 years and should
|: no longer have fans justifying his weaknesses by saying he is just young.
|: .
|: .
|: .
|: If Dallas had a QB that was as good as Emmitt Smith, Irving, or that defense,
|: I think Dallas would be awesome and 15-0 right now.  ^^^^^^   
|
|I don't think we'll ever have a quarterback as good as the whole city of
|Irving.  "Irving" is where Texas Stadium is, Michael Irvin is the wide
|receiver.
 
Getting a bit pedantic aren't we?

|Ask any General Manager for any team in the league (yes, Buffalo, Miami,
|Denver, San Francisco, Houston, too) if they would trade their starting
|quarterback for Aikman, and they wouldn't even have to think about the
|answer; absolutely yes.
 
That he's a lot younger than any of the starting quarterbacks from the teams
that you've listed wouldn't have anything do with it, would it?

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
+==========================================================================+
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: It wasn't Pretty (49ers WON)
Date: 21 Dec 1992 16:38:38 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

Every team can have a bad day, they did win but if they play 
that poorly in the playoffs they wont last very long.....

Go Cowboys !!!!!
tim
From: mmigdol@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (michael a migdol)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The FAT LADY IS SINGING in BUFFALO!
Date: 3 Jan 93 20:02:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: ut-emx.86090
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

I think that Fat Lady choked on a chicken bone...or maybe a buffalo wing. 
Buffalo scored 4 touchdowns in 6 minutes, and the score is now 35-31 with
a quarter left to play....If you turned the game off, TURN IT BACK ON!

-Michael
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand)
Subject: Re: Bills a Bust? (WAR is HELL)
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 06:37:41 GMT

jg> JOHN (Gloria)
gs> Gary Strand

jg> It seems "some" Bills fans always seem to bring the fact the they beat the
    Niners. Hey, that is old, history. That win does not mean the Bills are
    the best team, does it?

gs> It seems at least one Niners fan always seems to mention the fact that the
    Niners won 4 SBs. Hey, that is old, history. Those wins do not mean the 
    49ers are the best team this season, do they?

jg> Gary, if you are going to humiltate yourself, please try it somewhere else.

  Puhleeze. I've got your number sonny. Every time you rise to the bait, and 
  doing so just reinforces my belief that you are hypersensitive and para-
  noiac when it comes to my comments on your beloved 49ers.

jg> In case it has escaped you, which is quite obvious, which team has the BEST
    record? Which team is favored to win the playoffs and the SB? 

  The 49ers, obviously. But in the game between SF and Buffalo, SF lost. What
  is the relevance, you ask? Not a whole lot, really. Even less is the rele-
  vance of SF's 4 past SB wins. That's all I'm pointing out, John. Relax.

jg> That in itself does not guarantee a win or crap, but the Niners history
    is/has been relived this season.

  A 14-2 record does not an SB win make. Denver went 13-3 in 1984, their best
  record ever, and promptly lost to Pittsburgh in the 1st round of the play-
  offs. We'll just have to let the teams play and go from there, eh?

jg> Your truly hateful biases have blinded you from seeing the facts. 

  I don't hate the 49ers, I'm simply irritated by moronic fans like yourself.

jg> Yeah, I know, you will again attempt to discredit anything the Niners have
    accomplished in the past,

  4 SB wins *in* *the* *past* don't mean squat for SF's chances of winning the
  SB *this* *season*. Yes, I totally discredit *any* team's *past* performance
  as it relates to its *current* performance, SF (and the Broncos) included.

jg> plus what they have accomplished this year.

  Nope, not what I said. Actually, when the playoffs begin, a 9-7 team is in
  the same position as a 14-2 (or 16-0) team. Both are 0-0, and the 16-0 (or
  14-2) team doesn't get any credit (outside of a bye week) for their record.
  If the 9-7 team goes 1-0 against the 16-0 team, well, the 16-0 team is done
  for the year. You don't get "extras" for dominating the regular season. I
  don't see why this is so difficult for you to understand.

  I can out-flame and out-argue you, so why don't you simply concede and save
  yourself further embarassment (if such a thing is possible).

--
Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
From: bsutesch@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The FAT LADY IS SINGING in BUFFALO!
Date: 3 Jan 93 20:00:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: wsuhub.1993Jan3.140038.609
Organization: Wichita State University, Wichita, Ks

In article <1993Jan3.191522.2505@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:
> current score:  Oilers  35  Bills  3
> 
> Moon and company are in total control of this game.
> Does anyone want a play by play?

You better check again!
Oilers 35
Bills  31

Brian
Go Cowboys!
Go Baylor!

> 
> -- 
>  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
> "To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
> everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (The Purple Bleeder )
Subject: Re: Vikings Playoff chances/QB
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 19:09:06 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

I just cannot wait for the Vikes to get hold of a real QB
like Buerlein or Walsh or Tomzak etc. etc.  As somebody
else pointed out this would send the rest of the NFC
shivering in their shoes and make the Vikes really scary,
a team capable of inducing fear in the opponents, if not
already. The D is already terrorrizing opposing QBs.
I would also like to add the need of an young and fast
wide receiver.

S.H

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pboxrud@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul D Boxrud)
Subject: Cardinals in playoff drought
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 03:05:17 GMT


The USA Today had one of their cute little diagrams showing years that several 
teams have gone without making the playoffs.  The Cardinals were listed as 17 
years.  Didn't they lose a first round playoff game in 1982 (strike season) to 
Green Bay 44-14 or something like that.  Green Bay was listed as 10 years.

Paul
From: kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: SD Chargers Pro Bowl selections
Date: 23 Dec 92 19:32:34 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: what.. me.. organized?



San Diego Chargers Pro Bowl players:

Inside-Outside-Everywhere Line Backer Junior Seau
Defensive End Leslie O'Neal 
Corner Back Gill Byrd
Wide Receiver Anthony Miller


It seems like Chris Berman is desperate to find a nick-name for
the SD defense; "Arnie's Army", "Boltergeist defense"...
The best one I have heard so far [from fans] is "No-nickname defense".


_______________________________________________________
| Prashanth                    |                      |
| U. of California @ San Diego | prash@raman.ucsd.edu |
#######################################################
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (The Purple Bleeder )
Subject: Re: Vikings offense
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 04:35:19 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


Green has decided to stick with Slisbury for the Packer game.
At the same time he also said that Sean's place is
not autmatic for the playoffs which means Gannon
is still in.

S,.H
Vikes: 1992 NFC-Central Champs.!!!!
From: caeser@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Robert Michael Trotter)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: MKG Playoff Predicts
Date: 30 Dec 1992 17:49:36 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

	
	Well, as everyone else is throwing em out, Ill make some 
	predictions for this weeks games.

	Philadelphia 10 @New Orleans 13
	Washington    9 @Minnesota   21

	Kansas City  17 @San Diego   21
	Houston      24 @Buffalo     28

	Guess we will see how I did on Monday...

	Mark
	GO VIKINGS!
-- 
Minnesota Vikings	11-5	NFC Central Division Champions 1992-93!

Salisbury back in the pocket, DRAW to Allen, Allen bursts up the middle,TOUCHDOWN!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mas@cray.com (Michael A. Sand)
Subject: Re: Bermanisms
Reply-To: mas@cray.com
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 29 Dec 92 09:54:19 CST

Here is another one:

	Mike "Miami" Tice

---
 ______________________ ____________________________________________________
|                      |                                                    |
| Michael Sand         |                                                    |
| Cray Research, Inc.  |  Cray Research - The manufacturer of the world's   |
| Chippewa Falls, WI   |                  most powerful supercomputers.     |
| email: mas@cray.com  |                                                    |
|______________________|____________________________________________________|

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro