HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hacker@access.digex.com (Dark Hacker)
Subject: Re: Brains of Models
Keywords: beauty and brains
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 13:00:39 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.183326.1452@pixar.com> good@pixar.com (If you tell the truth you won't have to remember anything.) writes:
>In article <1992Nov15.185231.17480@husc3.harvard.edu> dchou@husc11.harvard.edu (David Chou) writes:
>:
>:Anyone else want to debunk the myth of beautiful = dumb? I'm now
>:quite tired of being the only person in this group who speaks out
>:along these lines. 
>
>You're not the only one.  A few weeks ago I posted the remarks of a model,
>who was a NASA computer scientist, stating that it made it hard to do her
>job when people treated her as though she were stupid.

And why are these "beauty + brains" models so hard to find?  Just as rare
as finding a guy with a great bod and brains too.  How many (male)
computer geeks that you know are fit enough for the Chippendales
calendar?  Hmmpphh.

But seriously, it's my understanding that to succeed in modeling you
*need* brains.  Its not like you're just a slab of meat shipped around to
different photo shoots.  Cindy Crawford and her million dollar Revlon deals
is no dummy.

- Hacker
-- 
010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101
Dark Hacker @ Black Silicon, Fortress Of Computation
Phone: (703) 356-6514    Internet: hacker@black-silicon.mclean.va.us
"I am the very instantiation of object oriented evil!"
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: kouhia@nic.funet.fi (Juhana Kouhia)
Subject: Re: Cindy cc040.gif (4/4)
Organization: Finnish Academic and Research Network Project - FUNET
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 19:30:45 GMT


I have got cc001-0052 images to nic.funet.fi
to pub/graphics/incoming directory.
But I didn't got any messages to graphics-adm@nic.funet.fi
mailing list.

I will put the images available to pub/pics/gif/pics/
people/woman/cindy2/ directory.

If you upload something remember send e-mail about them.
Thanks,

Juhana Kouhia
From: tominatr@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: Kathy Ireland
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:36:15 -0400
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Chalk up another Kathy fan!!!!

  - Tom N.
From: malhot@huey.EEAP.CWRU.Edu (malhot)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: the most beautiful women in the world
Date: 15 Nov 1992 22:09:26 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Electrical Engineering, CWRU, Cleve. OH
NNTP-Posting-Host: huey.eeap.cwru.edu

In article <92320.145912SS3254B@auvm.american.edu> Doc <SS3254B@auvm.american.edu> writes:
>Here goes,
>
>Kathy Ireland - SCHWING!!!
>Michelle Pfiffer (sp?)
>Cindy Crawford
>Mariah Carey
>Sinikka, my girlfriend :-)
>
>     Unrespectfully yours, Doc


	PAULINA PORIZKOVA!!!!!
	CAROL ALT!!!
	RENEE SIMONSEN (sp?)

and to a lesser extent
	Stephanie Seymour
	Ornella Muti a few years ago


Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: dean@pico.qpsx.oz.au (Dean Economou)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: Calendars and Brains
Date: 20 Nov 92 07:33:01 GMT
Organization: QPSX Communications LTD, Perth, Western Australia.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

Elle probably speaks French since was was married to a Frenchman and lived
with him in France for quite a few years in her early twenties.

I have heard second-hand from friends of my air-flight-attendant sister
that Elle in person is quite attractive to look at, but bllody rude, and
not very bright at all.  Not much evidence, but better than nothing.

Cheers,
Dean


Xref: sparky alt.supermodels:2035 soc.women:19985 alt.feminism:4752 soc.men:19624
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:48:53 EST
From: <LXP111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: READ THIS JENNY
Distribution: na
 <92Nov18.165910.12324@acs.ucalgary.ca> <1992Nov18.184702.4414@mprgate.mpr.ca>

Come on Victor babie...stop being so modest.


                               ==---da Long-man------>
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels,soc.women,alt.feminism,soc.men
From: bhv@areaplg2.corp.mot.com (Bronis Vidugiris)
Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson -- Faint Praise
Organization: Motorola, CCR&D, CORP, Schaumburg, IL
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 22:27:11 GMT

In article <19NOV199200232233@venus.tamu.edu> beh7214@venus.tamu.edu (HEAD, BRYAN EVERETT) writes:
)Summary:  
)Date: 19 Nov 1992 00:16 CST  
)Distribution: world
)Keywords:  

Various people write:
)> 
)>>pictures for their PS/2 machines, to run as a backdrop under windoze.  Now the
)>							      ^^^^^^^
)>Learn to spell WINDOWS!!  You know, like the thing you look out to see
)>outside while you're indoors!  
)> 
)>>girls who work there have their own PS/2 running windoze 
   ^^^^^

)>Once again, learn to spell...and get a life!
)>-Doc

What - no flames about using the word 'girls'?
Organization: The American University - University Computing Center
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 07:07:32 EST
From: <TSMITH@auvm.american.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: Lynda Carter as Wonder Woman

Yes. There is a nice PG gif of Lynda at the wuarchive.  FTP to wuarchive.wustl.
edu and look in the graphics/gif/l directory.  Happy hunting.

T.S.
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: kencham@centi.cs.umn.edu (Deepak Kenchammana-Hosekote)
Subject: Re: the most beautiful women in the world
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:56:52 GMT

A pregnant woman.

\thee puck
--
Kenchammana-Hosekotan at heart, a brahmin at lunch.
From: smode@nyx.cs.du.edu (Sarah Nelson)
Subject: Cindy Crawford
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 13:26:21 GMT


Could someone please e-mail me Cindy Crawford's address
, fan mail address or something similar.

Thanks

Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: hess@decoy.uucp (25441-hess)
Subject: Re: Sexual harassment on the net??
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 12:52:44 GMT

>If Jennifer believes that she is being harassed, then that treatment *is*
>harassment.  

See, this statement is what bothers me about this whole harrasment argument.
Mind you I do not condone, or approve of the posts/email that has been sent
to Jenniifer, and she has every right to ask for them to stop. I also hope
that the lameoid that posted them gets heat for being a twit. However, the 
above statement goes too far. An Example:

Lets say that I met Jennifer in the lobby of a building every morning as we
went about our business. Lets say that I found her attractive and wanted to
make my presence known, so every day I would walk up to her and say "good
morning, how are you today", and every morning I would be ignored. Now, 
unknown to me the daily greeting is very annoying to Jennifer and after
a period she comes to feel that I am harrasing her. Well then I guess by your
definition it's true and I should be flogged in public.

This is not an exaggerated scenario, I the environment in which I work it
is taken to this extreme! I know a person who was repremanded for telling
a woman that she had on a "very nice dress". He was told that comments of
this personal nature were inappropriate to the workplace and could be 
deemed harrasment! The fellow I know made 1 comment to the woman (not 
repeated as in my example), and had no intentions other than to be polite.

As others have stated, lets not diminish the importance of the very real
sexual harrasment issue by making it's definition so broad. Jenifer did
the correct thing she asked for the crap to STOP! If it does'nt then further
action should be taken, but lets not run to extremes right off the bat.


MKH
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: osickey@dryer.ecn.purdue.edu (Matt J. Osickey)
Subject: Re: Sexual harassment on the net??
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: 20 Nov 92 18:15:40 GMT

SXW103@psuvm.psu.edu (S. Wukovitz) writes:

>Jim Hood sez:
>>You know...  Joke or not, legally that could be considered sexual harassment.
>>If that account belongs to a STUDENT, that would definately be grounds for
>>expulsion from college.  If that account was from an employee (faculty or
>Unfortunately, I don't know if it would here, unless the person harassed
>were a member of the Center for Academic Computing staff.  Remember the
>James Whitehead posting of about 4 years ago, anyone?  Well, Whitehead
>never even lost his account, as far as I know...

>In other words, don't hold your breath, folks.  Nobody will do anything
>at all to Mr. Long Phamdo, most likely...

   I would like through out the little fact that with the 
   supreme court declaring that a variety of speech codes 
   are unconstitutional (including most codes applying to
   publication in public domain) very little action will
   probably be taken in these situations.  At the present
   time there is a great degree of confusion about what can
   be said, written, or posted legally and what constitutes
   harassment of a person based on sex, religion, race,....

   Cases involving corporations may be different.

                                azrael

Newsgroups: alt.supermodels,alt.binaries.pictures.erotica
From: rock@medch.b17b.ingr.com (Chris Hudson)
Subject: Re: Cindy cc051.gif (2/7)
Reply-To: rock@medch.b17b.ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:28:28 GMT

Could someone repost or e-mail part 1 to me?  We didn't seem to get it 
here...

Chris Hudson
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I did *what*?  Sorry, but you've got the wrong guy........
                                                          Save the Sharks!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: jte@beefheart.cc.columbia.edu (Jeff Eldredge)
Subject: Re: Calendars and Brains
Reply-To: jte@beefheart.cc.columbia.edu
Organization: Columbia University
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:51:48 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.080306.14983@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>  
maynard@leah.msc.cornell.edu (Maynard J. Handley) writes:
> 
> This talk of sin and morality. I always thought the first part of  
morality
> was
> tolerance, and "do unto others as you would be done unto you." 

How exactly does the above principle apply to this situation??  Because no  
one is disallowing me to enter the profession of modelling, I should not  
judge any other for his or her decision to pursue such a career??  

>I guess you
> feel
> morality is selective and you can choose the parts of it you want. 

Morality IS relative, if that's what you mean.  My morality is obviously  
not your morality is obviously not some other's morality.  Moreover, I'd  
be happy to argue the contention that the advertising industry, as a key  
component of corporate America, has spiralled out of control and thus  
possesses a quesitonable moral value in today's society.  

>What
> will you offer for an encore? Telling us that gays are the spawn of  
SATAN
> and should be put to death?

I don't see what gayness has to do with any of this.  I'm talking about  
modelling and advertising.  
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: rock@medch.b17b.ingr.com (Chris Hudson)
Subject: Re: that's IT!
Reply-To: rock@medch.b17b.ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:35:42 GMT

Jennifer,

I'm sorry to hear that some of the guys on this net feel the urge to act 
in such an insulting, rude manner.  There is no excuse for sending mail to
anyone, female or male, that is insulting, degrading, and crude.  I've also 
gotten rude responses from people who disagreed with my posts.  There's just 
no excuse for it.

Hope you can nail the jerks!

Chris Hudson 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I did *what*?  Sorry, but you've got the wrong guy........
                                                          Save the Sharks!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: jennifer@netcom.com (Jennifer!)
Subject: okay okay i'm loved!
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 01:03:24 GMT


Okay you guys!! Okay! I know you all aren't a bunch of pot-slime. :)
More thanks and kudos to Scott, R A, Brian, Synth, Steve, Kevin,
Mike, -wat- (I liked your suggestion, btw!), Bill, Darren and more
kudos to my new friend Craig. Oh, and thanks for your great post,
Victor. :) You guys are so sweet for helping to turn a horrible
and disgusting episode into something that is now much easier to
deal with. Thankyouthankyouthankyou.. all of you.

-Jennifer
From: dan@seismo.pnl.gov (Dan Hagedorn)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: READ THIS JENNY
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:47:43 GMT
Reply-To: dan@seismo.pnl.gov
Followup-To: dev/null
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.

So, what does this have to do with alt.supermodels??????????

Everyone knows that ther are many asshole macho idiots out there.

Recap:
There were offenses.
There was an apology from someone not guilty.
There are now too many inane posts concerning a topic NOT
 relevant to this newsgroup.

If it will help, I too will apologise for the juvenille attitude
of my fellow "men".  Now, let's get this newgroup back on track.

Post flames to Alt.juvenille.men.assholes
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: c91tomis@odalix.ida.liu.se (Tom! Isaksson...)
Subject: Re: REQUEST: Vanessa Paradis GIFs
Organization: CIS Dept, Univ of Linkoping, Sweden
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 16:59:30 GMT

joho@pfbs.philips.se (Hans ter Horst) writes:

>Hej!

>Can anybody mail me GIFs of Vanessa Paradis? The Frence model with a singing
>career.

Isn't it more like... The French singer with a modeling career upcoming

>Much obliged

>/Hans
>--
>  [ Hans ter Horst       -  Digital Equipment BCFI, AB  -      Sweden ]
>  [ #include <std/disclaimer>                                         ]
>  [ joho@pfbs.philips.se                                              ]

I'd like to see some gifs of her too (posted, of course) but NOT HERE.
They would fit in better in a.b.p.m, I think.


--
******************************************************************************
** Tom! Isaksson...   ** E-MAIL: c91tomis@und.ida.liu.se                    **
** Troskareg. 51:22   ** Institute of Technology , Linkoping, Sweden        **
** S-583 30 Linkoping ********************************************************
** SWEDEN           <<---- For a visit, or snail-mail                       **
**                      Phone:  +46  (0)13 21 49 33 (vocal, at home)        **
**  -> ->           "WAKE UP, TIME TO DIE..."  (Bladerunner)                **
******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: tcable3.jpg (part1/2)
From: brycerw@brandonu.ca
Date: 19 Nov 92 10:56:34 CST
Organization: Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada

In article <1992Nov18.182420.13248@mtu.edu>, ksjohnso@mathlab.mtu.edu(KRIS A. JOHNSON) writes:
> In article <1992Nov18.172611.101@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>  
> c5ff@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (COOK  Charlie) writes:
>> I heard someone mention Tawnni Cable's name and I happened
>> to have a jpg of her.  I may be able to dig up a couple more,
>> if people think she belongs on this newsgroup.
>> 
>> Charlie
> 
> After viewing Tawnni's jpeg, I'd have to say that, yes, she could  
> definatley be placed among the lofty ranks of the supernmodels.  More of  
> the same would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanx,
> KJ

Yes. Yes. Post ALL you can of her.
--Rob
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: tj@alpine.b17a.ingr.com (T.J. Higgins)
Subject: ftp via e-mail (was: Re: Lynda Carter)
Reply-To: tj@alpine.b17a.ingr.com
Organization: The Ernest P. Worrell Institute for the Study of the Vernal Equinox
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:52:36 GMT

In article <By0LzL.53w@mail.boi.hp.com>, mhampsch@boi.hp.com (Mark Hampsch) writes:
|> If you find any gif/jpgs of lynda can you please post them.  Some of us do
|> not have ftp access out into the real world.

For those who don't have ftp access, there is a gateway that lets you 
ftp via e-mail.  Here are the particulars (this info comes from the 
archie mail server help file):

For your information anonymous FTP may be performed through the mail by
various ftp-mail servers. Send a message with the word 'help' in it to:
		bitftp@pucc.princeton.edu
or
		ftpmail@decwrl.dec.com

for an explanations on how to use them.

-- 
T.J. Higgins | tj@alpine.b17a.ingr.com | Intergraph Mapping | Huntsville, AL
"I got no time to mess around" -- Van Halen
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels,soc.women,alt.feminism,soc.men
From: tessier@bnr.ca (Daniel Tessier)
Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson -- Faint Praise 
Reply-To: Daniel.Tessier@bnr.ca
Organization: BNR Ottawa, Fibre Systems Development
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 20:54:14 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.175422.3033@dragon.acadiau.ca>, 890530m@dragon.acadiau.ca (Darren MacKenzie) writes:
|> Craig.Humphrey@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Craig Andrew Humphrey) writes:
|> 
|> >pictures for their PS/2 machines, to run as a backdrop under windoze.  Now the
|> 							      ^^^^^^^
|> Learn to spell WINDOWS!!  You know, like the thing you look out to see
|> outside while you're indoors!  
Actually, I kinda like the "windoze" spelling myself... Maybe the
humor of it is wasted on you? windoze... doze... as in "doze off"...
sleep... Get it?
|> 
|> >girls who work there have their own PS/2 running windoze 
|> 						  ^^^^^^^
|> 
|> Once again, learn to spell...and get a life!
Oh well, maybe you could get a sense of humor?
-- 
/---------------------------------------------------------------\
| Dan Tessier		       PHONE   : (613)765-2380		|
| Bell-Northern Research, Ltd. INTERNET: Daniel.Tessier@bnr.ca 	|
| Ottawa, Ontario, Canada      UUCP    : none right now...	|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| "Live and don't learn, that's us."				|
|			       - Calvin & Hobbes		|
\---------------------------------------------------------------/
From: lynch@ils.nwu.edu (Richard Lynch)
Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson -- Faint Praise
Organization: The Institute for the Learning Sciences
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 00:30:53 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.073341.5606@leland.Stanford.EDU> farthing@leland.Stanford.EDU (ljf) writes:

[windoze argument with "Get a life" insult removed.]

>I've always wondered about that insult, "get a life!"  The idea of one
>technogeek saying that another should get a life is amusing, but
>hardly insulting.

I just love it when feminists stereotype.  :-)
-- 
"TANSTAAFL"     Rich lynch@aristotle.ils.nwu.edu
From: bsaitow@biker.East.Sun.COM
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: jpg viewer
Date: 19 Nov 92 12:40:54 GMT
Reply-To: bsaitow@biker.East.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems
NNTP-Posting-Host: biker.east.sun.com

Anyone have one that will run on a Sun?


Thanks,

Bob
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: frandag@math.ksu.edu (Francis Fung)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: the most beautiful women in the world
Date: 18 Nov 92 00:13:42 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Mathematics, Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: hilbert.math.ksu.edu

kencham@centi.cs.umn.edu (Deepak Kenchammana-Hosekote) writes:

>A pregnant woman.

Definite agreement. Not to mention pregnant supermodels; I have seen
a picture of pregnant Rachel Hunter, and also one of a model named
"Honey Labrador", desafortunadamente perdida. Anyone got any of Stephanie
Seymour?
I think I may have asked already, but just checking.

By the way, to the poster (Deepak), I think that the guy who wrote in
in support of Jennifer and apologized on behalf of all males in net-land, 
whom you said should have emailed, was correct in posting it as an open
letter. Although none of our apology can compensate for someone else's 
crass and unconscionable behavior, the least we can do is make it 
as audible as possible. 

>--
>Kenchammana-Hosekotan at heart, a brahmin at lunch.

Francis Fung
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels,soc.women,alt.feminism,soc.men
From: payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne)
Subject: Re: Supermodels contribute to spiraling low self esteem?
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 14:55:15 GMT

In article <Bxtt3E.9s4@news.cso.uiuc.edu> levine@symcom.math.uiuc.edu (Lenore Levine) writes:
>brian@quake.sylmar.ca.us (Brian K. Yoder) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Nov12.182022.9195@tellab5.tellabs.com> chrz@tellabs.com (Peter Chrzanowski) writes:
>>>In article <1dsbfhINN8hi@bigboote.WPI.EDU>, cor@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Cory Shimer) writes:
>>>> If someone makes you feel relatively unattractive by what they say
>>>> or do, and then you happen to see some poster of some supermodel...
>
>>Perhaps feminists would feel better about themselves if the only pictures
>>in magazine ads, posters, etc. were of ugly sloppy pathetic women.  Is that
>                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>a solution to their self-esteem problems?  I doubt it.
>
>>--Brian
>
>Just a quick question, Brian. Why do you equate not being
>very good looking, and not putting that much energy into
>one's appearance, with being pathetic?
>
>Why is a woman like Marie Curie, Golda Meir or Harriet Tubman
>more pathetic than a woman like Marla Maples, Madonna, or 
>Vanna White? 

The curious thing here is that you are inserting your own opinions
of what is and is not pathetic, and berating Brain for these images
not living up to your ideals.

He did not mention what he considered beautiful/ugly, pathetic/non-
pathetic, or sloppy/neat. Granted the last is not so much a matter
or personal taste as the others.
 
>I think it would be more fun to be one of the former three, myself.
>At any rate, I suspect they had more fun in bed (not having
>to project sexy vibes for economic reasons).

But who knows if they were fun in bed or not? I suspect political
ideologies are not a great indicator of funness in bed, or sexiness.
 
>Lenore Levine 


Rich
From: egilmour@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re:  the most beautiful women in the world
Date: 23 Nov 92 11:19:17 -0400
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

panlilio@acs.ucalgary.ca (Victor P. Panlilio) writes:
>Well, for the record:  I discourage the models I meet from getting 
>tans, emphasizing to them that the *collagen* damage they suffer
>from trying to look "healthy" is in fact long-term and possibly
>irreversible (even with Retin-A).  I personally think Winona is
>gorgeous, and I would dearly love to photograph her (I suppose I
>should confess that I have a personal *weakness* for her "type",
>just as I do for Alyssa Milano, Phoebe Cates, Shannen Doherty,
>and a host of other brunettes; not that I dislike other types).

The above is excellent advice for people getting into modelling
(or for people who just want to look like a model).  Unfortunately
there are still people who think that tans are desirable and make
a person look "healthy", and I despair when I see models like
Christy Turlington with obviously bronzed skin (but
then again when she gets old enough for the damage to show, she'll
probably be a billionaire - and with that bone structure she'll
probably never have sagging skin).  Victor, you'll probably know, but
the models who look tanned in photographs, is that usually makeup?  
I don't think their agents would tolerate their models (or should
I say their bread and butter) having damaged skin.

Anyway, as a person who has tried to cultivate her pale skin very
carefully, I still get people telling me I should get a tan - 
which is very annoying.  I just wish I knew when I was young that sun
damage doesn't wholly show up right away because then I would
have protected myself earlier.  Tell your models that the
sun burn they get today will show up years later as deep crevices, 
sagging and bagging of the skin which can only be rectified through
cosmetic surgery (yuck).  And unlike Coco Chanel, I think that
today, untanned skin is again a mark of the priviledged class!(hee-he)