HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: root@june.cmp.rpi.edu (J.R. Ordon)
Subject: Re: Stations won't air RL's show during day
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 16:10:24 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.154312.17401@news.nd.edu> fdeck@vyasa.helios.nd.edu (francis deck) writes:
>Our poor helpless RL can't get his TV show aired during the day.
>Boo Hoo Hoo.  The reason is that there is some big conspiracy
>to suppress his ideas.  Everyone is out to hurt poor little
>RL.  You can't see me right now, but big crocodile tears are
>running down my face.
>
>Of course, the station managers are not acting in their self-
>interest as we'd expect conservative capitalists to do.  Oh no.
>They are left wing commie big business bad evil, which explains
>why the radio stations that they also own are happy to air RL's
>talk show during the day.  Besides, the airwaves are regulated
>by the government, which also explains why RL has no trouble
>getting his radio show aired.
>
>Perhaps the TV stations think that the kind of people who would
>watch RL's show are more likely to be up during the night, and
>that the people who traditionally advertise on his radio show,
>e.g. home-study literacy programs, would pay the station more
>$$$ if the show were on during the night.  But no... that would
>require the station managers to be capitalists.    
>
>Now, a more important issue is about Hilary Clinton.  As far
>as I can tell, people are arguing over whether she'll be another
>Nancy Reagan or another Barbara Bush, and which would be worse.
>
>f.deck
>

Station managers are not idiots.. the reason they run RL at night is
that he's currently 3rd in the late night ratings, the 2 in front of him
have networks behind them. He's currently beating the shit out of Arsenio,
Letterman & Woopie.

I'm glad the station managers aren't shoot from the hip morons like you...

-------------------------------------------------------------
J.R. Ordon
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: markb@iplmail.orl.mmc.com (Mark Bower)
Subject: Re: Broken Promises/Anit-Clinton sentiment growing
Organization: Martin Marietta
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 22:10:53 GMT

Does anyone talk about Rush on this net anymore!? Me neither...

In <C1C7qG.JAJ@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
	Steve Kellmeyer writes:

>> You know, I really have a tough time understanding this one [Haitian
>> refugees].  The US had 
>> no national immigration laws for the first century - didn't really start that
>> up until after the Civil War.  Anybody who wandered in was ipso facto American.
>> We picked up shiploads of starving Irish from the 1848-50 potatoe famine
>> this way (they'd land in Canada and walk across the border because the 
>> harbor authorities in New York and Boston imposed their own little 
>> "immigration laws" to keep the Irish out).

Interesting to check the numbers. At the height of the Ellis Island influx, the
number of accepted immigrants was around half what America currently averages.

>> It didn't hurt the country a bit to have them in.

Historically incorrect. Local residents routinely repressed the new arrivals for
fear of losing jobs to them, and the immigrants rioted so frequently that
National Guard units were sold to the highest bidder to go into the streets and
gun them down. I read once about a at the time financier named Jim Fisk who did 
exactly this.

>> Ditto Southeast Asian

Veritable slave labor for Western railroads.

>> and Cuban immigrants.

Some of the original migrant farm workers after the Spanish-American war.

>> Immigrants
>> tend to be very hard working and loyal Americans.  The only thing that's
>> changed is the way our society treats them.

Correct. We now prosecute those who kill them.

>> Instead of letting them make
>> it on their own, we insist on treating them as incompetent boobs who need
>> hand-outs.

I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU ON THIS POINT! :-)

American history has some truly surprising stuff. All the more so since it is all
so recent in a "young" nation like the US. If you thought Kent State was bad,
check out how anti-Civil War demostrators were treated in NYC. I believe the
numbers are around 10-20 dead per weekend!! The Pinkerton agency broke up a
railroad strike by breaking open a few hundred skulls. USGovt-Indian stories are
ghastly in both directions.

There is not much doubt that America has grown up a great deal and that we handle
problems far more equitably than ever before. Nowadays, we may scream, we may
push, we even kill - at a horrendous rate - but we handle a dynamic situation
that would have made those wonderful "fore-fathers" we hear so much about
petition Mother England for re-instatement!
From: sperry2699@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Condoms etc.
Date: 23 Jan 93 15:32:27 -0600
Distribution: world
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

In article <4421.97.uupcb@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us>, laurel.schippers@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us (Laurel Schippers)  writes:
> MF>|I'm sorry that you don't want to face the facts, but it is true and not jus
> MF>|in Colorado and New York but also in mine and Bill Clinton's home state: He
> MF>|put in school based health clinics where they pass out condoms to the stude
> MF>|and where he got his way and enforced a sex ed class; and lo and behold, th
> MF>|teen pregnancy rate and teen abortions in Arkansas are both in the top five
> MF>|the nation.
> MF>|(sorry to bust your bubble about Rush's facts)
> 
> MF>|Morris Fields

Actually, I've heard of cases where a person has obtained a condom from the
school's free distribution of them, and got HIV even though he used a condom. 
Anyway, he then sued the school.  Does anyone know about these kind of cases?

Please e-mail info to me.

Thanks,
ECM

sperry2699@iscsvax.uni.edu

Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:14807 alt.politics.clinton:20922 alt.politics.bush:16249 alt.politics.homosexuality:10022
From: mdl@cypress.com (Matt Landrum)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: God is intolerant of sin!
Date: 22 Jan 93 07:04:53 GMT
Organization: Cypress Semiconductor Southeast Design Center

In article <1jmogjINNpp4@hp-col.col.hp.com> smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith) writes:

   Like Leviticus?  Anyone who questions why Christians view 
   homosexuality as wrong, but don't have a problem with eating 
   pork, haven't the slightest clue as to what Christians believe 
   on these things, or why.  Definitly one of the more bizarre 
   red herrings you'll find.  

I swore I wasn't going to get involved in this one, but don't a lot of
Christians say "we bring forth the moral teachings of the bible, not
the cultural abberations of the time"?  In other words, thou shalt not
kill, but wear any type of clothing you want.  or, love thy neighbor,
don't cut his hand off if he steals...


--


Matt Landrum, CAD Engineer      | e-mail: mdl@cypress.com
Cypress Southeast Design Center | office: (601) 324-4609, FAX - 4614
1 Research Blvd, Suite 200      | "You can get what you want if you
Starkville, MS  39759           | know how to find it." -- Tower of Power
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: graham@venus.iucf.indiana.edu (JIM GRAHAM)
Subject: Bill Cosby's "tastelessness"...
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4   
Reply-To: graham@venus.iucf.indiana.edu
Organization: Indiana University Cyclotron Facility, Bloomington, Indiana
Distribution:  world
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 19:22:26 GMT

On yesterday evening's show (Friday Jan 22), Rush showed a clip in which
Bill Cosby walked onstage and spoke directly to Clinton and Gore while
shaking their hands.

It was clear that Cosby was trying to be funny.  But Clinton and Hillary
were clearly not all that amused.  Neither was Rush.

Cosby was wearing a flannel shirt, bib-overalls, and a farm-cap.

He acted confused because Clinton and Gore were wearing tuxedos, and he
was wearing the clothing that he thought he should wear, since Clinton
was from Arkansas, and Gore was from Tennessee.

I don't think Cosby meant this to be that tasteless, but it clearly 
looked like he was making fun of the "simple folk", ie other Americans.

Am I wrong? 

Jim Graham 

        -> ->Disclaimer: I do not speak for my company. <- <-
                          Neither do they speak for me.
 ______________________________________________________________________
| Internet: graham@venus.iucf.indiana.edu                              |
|           dolmen!jgraham@moose.cs.indiana.edu                        |
| BBS:      The PORTAL DOLMEN BBS/ParaNet ALPHA-GAMMA (sm) (9:1012/13) |
|            (812) 334-0418, 24hrs.                                    |
|______________________________________________________________________|
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: God is intolerant of sin!
Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Stuff and Nonsense Division
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 22:51:26 GMT

In article <1jmp5mINNptg@hp-col.col.hp.com> smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith) writes:

>And I'd love to believe that most homosexuals are tolerant, loving, open-minded people.
>The net posters give me absolutely no reason  to believe this, though.  Who's more 
>tolerant and open-minded?  Tim Pierce, or Mark Christensen?  Who's more 
>likely to resort to foul language and personal attacks in their posts? 

Ask yourself this, you bastard.  Who has better reason to?

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /               Rocks say goodbye.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
From: car@access.digex.com (Mr. Blue)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Atlas Shrugged
Date: 23 Jan 1993 13:10:20 GMT
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: access.digex.com

May I suggest this book as good reading. It is by Ayn Rand. It is a novel
that explores the basic liberal and conservative philosophies through its
characters. Basically a study in contrast between the "movers and shakers"
in the world vs. those who benefit from such people...                

Mr. Blue
From: gonzalez@athena.mit.edu (John R Gonzalez)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re:  ProLife, ProMurder, ProCrime and Iraq
Date: 22 Jan 93 16:28:42 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In an earlier post Steve Novak complains about paying for 
private schools with public funds.  I want to ask what public
funds?  If the citizens of the United States decide to spend
THEIR tax dollars on vouchers for public and private schools,
it is THEIR right to do so.  

You said that private religious schools are "brain-dead robot
makers", yet I know a ton of liberals that went to religious
schools.  What's the deal here?  Were you liberals that went
to religious schools so superior that you were able to 
overcome the brainwashing, while the rest of the unwashed 
masses don't know any better?  I know a many people here at 
MIT that went to religious schools and have free (and great
scientific) minds to boot.  

Let's say we accept Novak's absurdly stupid claim, religious 
schools turn out robots and Jesus freaks, what do the public
schools turn out?--gun toting losers who don't know the value
of life.  I went to a public school, and as conservative as I
am,teachers convinced me that I should register as a 
Democrat.  To this day I am a registered Democrat.  Talk
about brainwashing, I was pro death penalty, anti taxes, pro
gun ownership, and overall anti government.  Sounds like a 
pretty staunch conservative to me, yet teachers convinced me,
with my 17/18 year old head full of mush, to go Democrat. 
One of my best friends was a Republican and knew he wanted to
be a republican, and our government teacher teased him in
front of the class.  And this was in a concervative suburb of
California! God knows what it's like in a place like New York
City!

Wow!  Those public schools sure do foster independent thought
and different ideas!

				Hasta,
				John R. Gonzalez

P.S.  I'm still a Democrat now, cause I'm too lazy to 
      re-register.
From: loweaa@o231-23.Rose-Hulman.Edu. (Anthony A Lowe)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Pot anyone?
Date: 22 Jan 1993 06:24:30 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
NNTP-Posting-Host: o231-23.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

	Hey yall! Here is one we did not catch before the election. It  
starts with Bill and his appointment to the Attorney General. Well she is  
a firm believer in the legalization of pot for medicinal uses. So she is a  
hippy feminist who still is not read the research proving the couple of  
hundred of chemicals in each joint does more damage than a pack of  
cigarettes and THC does permanent brain damage, the good part is Bill's  
response. He says that if he were to smoke pot today he would inhale.  
Watch for smoke in the White House!
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Give me a break--P.C. misuse!
Date: 21 Jan 93 16:25:20 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

jjas@acs.nntp-read.bu.edu (Jason Stephenson) writes:
: The Political Correctness movement is a load of mis-informed
: post-structuralist crap.


Why, thank you.  We've been wondering.

Bill
From: mhl@genco.bungi.com (Mark Levy)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: More Proof Yu Can't Trust Democrats!!!
Date: 26 Jan 93 02:43:07 GMT
Reply-To: mhl@genco.bungi.com (Mark Levy)
Organization: Gentry & Assoc. Excelsior Springs, MO

In article <1993Jan25.080122.17872@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>barton@stiller.jjc.vyi  (Mike Barton) writes:
>]                                                    .  Then there was old
>] JFK who went to fight in the Pacific even though he had a serious back
>] problem.  


   I was under the impression that the back injury was suffered when his
PT Boat was rammed.


[[[  Attention!!! Tasteless Joke Alert...   ]]]

   I heard this the other night...  It is another one of those sick jokes
like the dead baby jokes...  

Why did Arnold Schwartzeneggar marry Maria Schriver?  To create a Kennedy who
could take a bullet

[[[   DISCLAIMER!!!  I found the preceeding joke to be funny in the same
      way as Judy Tenuda's joke about Chapman and Yoko Ono.  It falls under
      the "that's not funny-that's sick" category.  Actually, I have quite a
      bit of respect for certain members of the Kennedy family, in particular,
      Joeseph Jr., JFK, RFK, and the Kennedy women, who have had to put up with
      all the deaths and scandals, and done so with grace.
]]]

Mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mark Levy  Senior System Engineer and Resident UNIX Weenie 
Micrologic/ValCom   17601 E. 40 Hwy, Suite C   Independence, MO  64055
Sysop Kludge BBS  (816)246-4375 - Public Novell info BBS on PCBoard
Voice (816)478-4270    Email: mhl@genco.bungi.com    CI$: 72450,3217
NOTICE - All standard disclaimers and copyrights (& copylefts) apply.
The above views do not reflect those of Gentry & Assoc., or any living being.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.homosexuality,talk.religion.misc
From: gsmith@polyhymnia.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith)
Subject: Re: Gay rights vs. homophobe rights? (was Re: God is intolerant of sin!)
Organization: IWR, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 93 12:32:49 GMT

In article <1jpiecINNeuv@hp-col.col.hp.com> smithw@col.hp.com (Walter
Smith) writes:

>Try hopping over to soc.religion.christian. The only arguments I've
>seen on this subject that come close to dealing in an intelligent way
>with it have been by "Hot Young Star".  Melinda/Robert/Evelyn sound
>more like they should be talking to someone who is Jewish, instead of
>Christian.

Hopping over to soc.culture.christian won't work because the moderator
does not usually allow discussion of the subject, and never allows a
complete discussion.  I suggest hopping over to talk.religion.misc
instead.






-- 
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/IWR/Ruprecht-Karls University 
               gsmith@kalliope.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:14761 talk.abortion:57235
From: cj@eno.esd.sgi.com.esd.sgi.com (C.J. Silverio)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: About RU486 Re: Different Point
Date: 22 Jan 93 00:06:21 GMT
Followup-To: talk.abortion
Organization: SGI TechPubs

---
In article <8903@news.duke.edu>, eyc@acpub.duke.edu writes:
|Social consequences notwithstanding, it's just really weird to approve
|a drug to a pregnant woman to not get pregnant.

I'm not quite sure I can parse this.  If I am parsing it correctly,
though, my reply is:

Not at all.  Pregnant women often wish to "get not pregnant".
Drugs can be safer than surgery, no matter how minor the surgery.
So why not test & approve such a wanted, beneficial drug?

---
C J Silverio	cj@sgi.com	ceej@well.sf.ca.us
"Perhaps my favorite moment was when a pro-lifer threatened to 
kill me.  Or maybe it was when a pro-lifer said I should have been 
aborted.  Nah, the best moment was when the one who said I 
should be killed claimed to respect all life."  --Jay Stein, in talk.abortion
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:14760 alt.politics.clinton:20857 alt.politics.bush:16234 alt.politics.homosexuality:9990
From: smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: Pick and Choose? (was  Re: God is intolerant of sin!)
Date: 22 Jan 1993 00:14:17 GMT
Organization: Colorado Springs IT Center
NNTP-Posting-Host: fajita19.cs.itc.hp.com

mike@gordian.com (Michael A. Thomas) writes:
> In article <1jn80uINN4j0@hp-col.col.hp.com>, smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith) writes:
> > Do you really not have any understanding 
> > as to why laws like those from Leviticus are not still followed, while 
> > sexual morality/conduct ones are?   
> 
>   Expediency? Self righteous hypocrisy?

OK, now fess up.  How many people had actually placed bets that the first 
response to that question would be along these lines?  =8^O  Money in 
the bank...

Walter
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:15:28 EST
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush is anti-American

In article <C17z75.LAx@ms.uky.edu>, @nx01.mik.uky.edu (Michael J. Chilton) says:

>        I was a frequent listener to the Rush Limbaugh program, a
>nd liked the words he said very much, but all that has changed. Now that he is
>on the case of Bill Clinton, the President of the United States of America, it
>is not funny anymore. Rush can find something to be funn

>y about that would help to unite America instead of to divide it. He is only
>making the problem of an un-united nation worse.the United States of America, t
>i
>is not funny anymore. Rush can find something to be funn

So I assume you got really pissed off at every Dan Quayle joke you've ever
heard, right?  How dare anyone make jokes about an elected official!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Kurt  E.  Ludwick     | If PRO is the opposite of CON, then
 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -|
 kel111@psuvm.psu.edu  |             what's the opposite of Progress...?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way)
Subject: Re: Rush Military Record
Organization: New Mexico State University, MetaPhysical Science Laboratory
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 06:31:47 GMT

>>>>> On 18 Jan 93 22:58:11 GMT, clinton@uark.ark.edu (Jim Clinton) said:
Clinton> Well I was just wondering, to me Rush looks old enough to
Clinton> have served in Vietnam and all.  So what is Rush's
Clinton> military record?

They ain't none. Adoring Dittos insist that he had some sort of physical
problem which prevented his military service. The rest of us just think he
must be a yellow hypocritical coward who managed to avoid the draft.

Apparently Rush didn't even have to moral courage to oppose the war.
Maybe he was just too busy flunking out of college.

Clinton> The way he talks I guess fat boy in his leaner days must
Clinton> have had a purple heart and a number of other metals of
Clinton> high honor for the courage he and Dan Quayle showed in
Clinton> defending their nations honor in Vietnam.

Nah. Leave that to the Rabid Robert Dornan. Although it sounds like Dornan
spent most of his combat time in a Saigon whorehouse, he supposedly was a
decorated Viet Vet. Apparently, it blew his mind out - he's been slobbering
New Right propaganda ever since.

Clinton> I'm sure many of you Shittos have the full record of Rush
Clinton> Limpboy's military valor.  Please feel free to post all
Clinton> information here on the NET.

It's getting harder and harder to stir them.. 

Clinton> -----------------------
Clinton> Jim Clinton
Clinton> Even after Jan 20th I'll still call him Cousin Bill. 

Yeah, right, Jimbo.
Wooooeee. Pigs! Soooooeeeee!!

L.
"Yeh, Buddy..            | larry@psl.nmsu.edu (Larry Cunningham)|  _~~_
 I've got your COMPUTER! | % Physical Science Laboratory        | (O)(-)
 Right HERE!!"           | New Mexico State University          |  /..\ 
 (computer THIS!)        | Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 88003    |   <> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are CORRECT, mine, and not PSLs or NMSUs..
I admit the deed! Tear up the planks! It is the beating of his hideous
"Don't. Stop. Thinkin' about tomorrow!".

Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: hunter@quake.sylmar.ca.us (James Collins)
Subject: Re: Clinton's Ethics
Organization: Quake Public Access, Sylmar CA
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 15:20:31 GMT

James William Stepanek <js43+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

<Stuff about Stepha...  Um, what's his name... deleted>
> congressional leaderships handling of hearings and legislations in
> relevance to the fall campaign, then it was a felony. This simply calls
> for an investigation of these activities. It also seems to put a dent
> into good ol' Slick's calls for ethics in government, or is Slick(and
> his aids, ect.) only required to be ethical after he is elected. Well I
> guess if no investigation occurs my question is aswered.
> James Stepanek

Gee, I thought it was pretty obvious.  Slick Willie and his aids are onle 
required to be ethical when the issue doesn't pertain to them.  After 
all, look at Zoe...  :)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
James Collins                        | Tips to live by from Rodney King
hunter@quake.sylmar.ca.us            | and Reginald Denny...
james.collins%bbs@quake.sylmar.ca.us | STAY... IN... THE... CAR...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:14636 alt.politics.homosexuality:9935
From: smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: God is intolerant of sin!
Date: 21 Jan 1993 14:58:36 GMT
Organization: Colorado Springs IT Center
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: fajita19.cs.itc.hp.com

twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
> 
> With Pinkas?  Well, it's pretty darn close, anyway.  He doesn't listen
> to *anything*.

Wow, I've heard of calling the kettle black...;-) 

> "Defending" homosexuality being defined here as arguing that the Bible
> does not openly attack it?  God, what a sorry excuse for a person
> *you* are.

And you're _such_ a guy, Tim...=8^O  So what do _you_ think the 
Bible says about homosexuality, Tim? 

Walter
 
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:15275 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:13969 alt.politics.clinton:21357 alt.politics.bush:16393 alt.politics.homosexuality:10365