From: tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Date: 16 Nov 1992 13:02:29 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: venture.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <Bxo1vF.ArK@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>>>>>>K e n does not bore people, for K e n is K e n, and K e n can only be
>>>>>>>>>K e n, thus K e n is K e n and only K e n.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Wait wait wait a minute...K e n is K e n, therefore K e n does not bore people?
>>>>>>>>I'm having a problem with the logical connection between the two...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Simple, K e n is K e n, and since K e n is K e n, then K e n is K e n,
>>>>>>>and thus K e n is not boring, for K e n can only be K e n.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Does K e n have the ability to fucking well refer to himself in the first person?
>>>>>
>>>>>K e n can refer to K e n anyway K e n deems to.
>>>>
>>>>Then refer to yourself as a fool, for that is what you are.
>>>
>>>But then K e n would be just like you. But K e n is not like you, thus
>>
>>I thank God you are not like me. I would not wish to be a moron as yourself.
>
>K e n is not a moron, for K e n is K e n. In any case, you could never
>be like me, for you lack the intelligence.

I would ask you to wager upon that fact, but you seem to meak and fearful you would lose as
indicated below.
>
>>>K e n is not a fool.
>>
>>Would you care to wager on that, moron?
>
>K e n does not gamble. Gambling is illegal.
>
Thus resting the point I made above. Only one who knows they can not win would respond as such,
which also proves you are a fraud.  Don't respond to this by saying something like:

    K e n is not a fraud, for K e n is K e n and cannot lie.

It would only prove me correct in my theory.  As to the point of my intelligence, you know nothing
of how intelligent I am nor are you able to know.

>>>>>>We know K e n is K e n, But K e n is also a fucking dipshit in the honest oppinion
>>>>>>of several million people viewing this part of the net.
>>>>>
>>>>>Perhaps you would like to post your poll of several million people.
>>>>>K e n is interested in what people have to say. K e n requires information
>>>>>at once.
>>>>>
>>>>I would not want to upset you, as if I could, for your ego is to large.
>>>
>>>In other words, you never polled several million people. In other words,
>>>you're full of shit.
>>
>>Check the posts, moron. I have posed this question, and thus confirmed this
>>through the posting of Charles Kincy whom writes:
>>
>>|:  Everyone already knows that KJR is a dipshit.
>>                                ^^^(as refering to you)
>
>This is illogical. K e n cannot see how you can attain several million
>people in a poll, when that number of posts has not been attained since K e n
>has started posting to this group. Further, it is highly doubtful that
>Mr. Kincy would know that many people, and besides, Mr. Kincy is
>a misinformed individual, thus your source is not good. You sir,

I would love to hear Mr. Kincy's responce to that remark.

>have made an error in your argument. You are indeed misinformed.
>
>>>>>>Also, stop trying to be Zen Budda for us and get a life K E N !!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>K e n is not Zen Budda. K e n is K e n. You have been informed.
>>>>>
>>>>This is correct. Zen Budda had more sense that did you.  But it is true that you 
>>>>portray yourself as a philosopher as was Budda.  This is your error.  You lack
>>>>the philosophical background to do this.  But, far be it from me to accuse you
>>>>of this without a test. I then pose you this question:  What is that which is
>>>>eternal in nature, but ends continuously? 
>>>
>>>Nothing in nature fits this description.
>>
>>WRONG!! There is an answer, therefore your ability to philosophize here is
>>a fraudulant display of stupidity. 
>
>K e n's answer is correct. You have erred once again. Further, you have
>not given an answer to your question. K e n sees no evidence that suggests
>that K e n made a mistake. K e n is correct.

The answer is life.  Life is eternal in its nature but is ended by death daily.
If you had an iota of intelligence, you would have been able to answer correctly,
but K e n has no intelligence, therefore K e n is a moron.

>
>>>>I await your answer.
>>>
>>>Your answer has been given.
>>
>>I think not.  Try again moron.
>
>No need to, for K e n is correct.

That is not correct. K e n is incorrect. 

>
>>PS   If you should want a clue as toward the answer to my riddle, e-mail me.
>>     You have my address.
>
>K e n does not require clues, for K e n is correct. You sir, are in dire
>need of clues.
>
K e n does require clues, for K e n was unable to answer.