HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ahsan@todd.ecn.purdue.edu (Ahsan Ale-Rasool)
Subject: FINALITY OF PROPHETHOOD / Beliefs of some Qadiyani's
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 21:21:39 GMT

Mr Arshad Hussain writes:
 
%  My belief regarding father of Jesus has nothing to do with Ahmadiyyat.
%  I am follower of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan in this and many other
%  issues which have not been  discussed on SCP.
%  I have no desire to start any controversial discussion.
%
%  Please read 'Hayaat-e-Javed' by Maulaana Iltaf Hussain Haali
%  and judge for yourself. 
%  
%  As far as Final Prophethood of Holy Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) is concerned,
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
%  I believe this is my faith and it should be the faith of every muslim
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
%  and it was the belief of my Pir-o-Murshad Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.




The two underlined statements by you are commendable. (Although I totally
disagree with you about your beliefs on Jesus (A.S).

I wanted to know if this belief (about the Finality of Muhammad's (S.A.W.S)
Prophethood) is your own personal belief or is it the belief of a good 
number of Qadiyani's (perhaps the Lahori ? sect). If this view is held
by a large group of Qadiyani's, then what is their opinion about the
other Qadiyani's who believe that Mirza Qadiyani was a prophet?
 As far as I understand, the main reason that the Qadiyani's were declared
Non-Muslims was because of their belief in another prophet as you have
seen on the net. 

  I asked this question because I think it makes a lot of difference.
I think that you are closer to Islam than you are to the other Qadiyani's.
(Except your belief in Jesus).


                                           Thanks.
                                       
                                       Ahsan Ale-Rasool
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: mss1@cec2.wustl.edu (Muhammad Sajid Saeed)
Subject: Re: F L O Y D ...
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis Mo.
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 23:33:07 GMT


Ali,  welcome aboard!!!!!

>>	Well tough luck, suck **** thru a starw
>>>                            ^^^^

>Do you have any idea how many combinations are possible here ??


>I can't imagine why you waited this long.
You have a point!

>>God is real, unless declared integer

>Why dont you just make Him a dangling reference and lets forget about it all.

(S)he just won't listen!!!!! Don't bother...
						
				Sajid [finally not alone] Saeed



Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: ab0kfc@gdt.bath.ac.uk (K F Chow)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.polish,soc.culture.portuguese
Subject: BMS survey
Date: 6 Apr 92 17:50:02 GMT
Organization: School of Architecture, University of Bath, UK

If you are an undergradate of engineering you may like to
do a questionnaire through email, on the subject "Building
Management Systems". This questionnaire is being done by 
your counterparts at USA, CAN, & UK. Comparison will be 
made between you and them.

If you know nothing about BMS but you know some others may 
do, please pass on the message.

Come and Join the party !!

-------------------------------------------------------------
K.F CHOW                      email : ab0kfc@uk.ac.bath.sl1
School of Architecture &              ab0kfc@uk.ac.bath.gdt
Building Engineering,
Bath University, UK
-------------------------------------------------------------
From: ss511583@longs.LANCE.ColoState.EDU (Sohban Shahid)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: 'burqa and muslim women'
Date: 9 Apr 92 23:33:12 GMT
Reply-To: ss511583@longs.LANCE.ColoState.EDU (Sohban Shahid)
Organization: Colorado State U. Center for Computer Assisted Engineering.

>	I find that it is not really intelligent to criticise the views
>	of someone when I don't know them. [stuff deleted]

                                          good   and   intelligent   practice

>                  Only now that I have
>	read his books am I qualified to render an opinion about them.

                       It  depends on  your  exposure  and  sometimes 
its  quite
                       difficult   to pass  any  comment  after  even
going through
                       more than two books.  But in general its a
quality of an author
                       to prepare the mind of its reader to accept any
verdict  rather
                       than imposing on them with no flexibility.  It 
is an analogue of 
                       actor and audience relationship.  App  ko  kesa
lagai ga kai jub
                       nau   bajai announcer aai   aur  mukhatib ho  kai
khabarna suno
                       warna  TV  baand ker do. I hope you still 
remmeber those 
                       TV  announcers and their peculiar way of announcement.
                       

                       The projection of Islam in the west is not
correct  because 
                       they present Islam as a religion of primitive
society, and
                       that is the reason why people are scared of  it. 
But honestly
                       Islam is very liberal and there is nothing to be
scared of.
                       If you have noticed that whenever they show our women
                       its always behind a viel and this is complete nonsense.
                       In Pakistan its not like this but exceptions are
always there. 
                       In true sense simply means that a women should dress up
                       in a modest way and it is possible without
wearing and going
                       through the hassles of burqa.  Pointwise, I agree
with you.  

>I most emphatically do not believe that a woman must obey her husband. 
                

                          Now, this is stunning. In a friendly
environment a husband 
                           can live with it otherwise Ms.  I can only whistle.
Allah  Hafiz,

----------------------------------------------------
SOHBAN SHAHID               e-mail ss511583@longs.lance.ColoState.Edu
Civil Engg. Dept.                     (303) 491 5844/8204 (work)
Colorado State University (303) 224 0397  (home)
Ft. Collins, CO-80523
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: obaidr@bullet.ecf.toronto.edu (OBAID ARIF)
Subject: Re: 2 + 2 = 5
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 21:47:44 GMT

In article <2059@transfer.stratus.com> tariq@sw.stratus.com (Tariq Afzal) writes:
>Asad Iqbal replies to an article from Mr. Khan
>
>[stuff deleted]
>Allah with us, so we are the supreme nation" Well Sir, that's not the
>case. Being Muslim is no big deal, being a true muslim is. Moderation is
>the key to a better life. God doesn't need our trust. He is up there
>commanding the world all he wants us to do is pray and be nice to all
>his creation. He wants us not to follow islam blindly, but to undersatnd
>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Hay, where did you develop this notion. I guess after skipping 4th aya of Baqra.
>If so then it goes like "Al lazeena u-minoona bilgaeeb .....", sure I don't need
>to translate that.
>
>Tariq [beleives blindly in Allah] Afzal

	The arabic word "u-minnona" comes from the word "iman" which comes
from the root word "amana".  The word "amana"  literally means safety,peace
security, protection [pg 28, A dictionary of Modern Written Arabic by H. Wehr]
	This peace, security,etc. comes only if you have confirmed your
beliefs. i.e. have proofs for them. You will be at peace with yourself only
after you have confirmed your beliefs. In fact Ulemas have pointed out that
imaan comes after one has 'confirmed one's belief without a shoadow of a 
doubt'! 
	If you have blind faith then you are on shaky grounds since your 
mind is not at peace; there are parts in your beliefs that you do not 
understand but follow and are thus uncomforatable with. Hence, there is no
'amana' in you.

	'bilgaeeb' means the Unseen. (i.e. heaven,hell,angels,etc). One 
believes in these only after one has confirmed without a doubt (imaan) 
that the Book (Qur'an) and the message (Islam) are the TRUTH. If you 
have proven to yourself that the book is indeed from the creator and that
the creator is always truthful then it follows that you believe in the 
'Ghaeeb'. This is the most rational thing to do after your confirmation
about the book. Thus there is no "Blind Faith" in Islam.

Arif[ believes rationally in Allah] Obaid
From: memon@acsu.buffalo.edu (Naveed Siraj Memon)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Request for desi jokes
Date: 10 Apr 92 23:42:07 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: UB




We are having a Pakistani Night at SUNY/Buffalo. If you have any desi
jokes that are clean enough, could you mail them to me so that I have
more material to include in the program booklet.


Thanks

Naveed
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: mirza@sce.carleton.ca (Murad A. Mirza)
Subject: Jafry, muaf karna garmi ziada kha giya tha
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 15:05:20 GMT

assalma alaikum
muafi ka talabgar houn aap ka poora khat nahi parah Isliyae ijtihadi
ghalti ho gai.

laikin parda uthna tha uth gaya!!!! Aab aaega maza.

  	Dil Say Jo Baat Nikalti Hay Asar Rakhti Hay
		(sirf Musalmanoun Ke Liyae)

	Baidharak Kuud Para Aatish'e'Nimrud Mein Isshq
	Aaql Hay Mehvae Tamashae Lub'e'Baum Abhi
		(Qadianioun and friends Kay liyae,
		Your favorite Allama also said the above
		IBRAHIM (PBUH) did not have any concept of
		hell or heaven either but Allah Wahid)

Murad Mirza.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: CONTROVERSY KHATAM
From: A.Qadir@massey.ac.nz (A. Qadir)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 21:41:07 GMT
Organization: Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
X-Reader: NETNEWS/PC Version 2c

From: Mahfooz Ahmed Jafry <32JMVQG@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU>
Date: Monday, 13 Apr 1992 04:06:36 EDT
Organization: Central Michigan University

Salam Alaikum :

        Those who says 'Lanatullahe allal kazbeen' to muslimeen in fact 'Lantua
llahe allal Qadianeeen' and say 'sallo alaih wasallam to khatum mursaleen'.

*****************    A'Ameen....A'Ameen
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: nabeel@sce.carleton.ca (Nabeel Ghuzlaan)
Subject: Comments on QD's Articles
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 04:21:02 GMT

   I observed that the front denying GA prophethood quote references to his
books while others just say their argument without enough reference. Let me
show you, please. 

3040_3744@uwovax.uwo.ca wrote:

>Ok I will buy your argument. Lets talk more sensibly it seems that you are
>getting confused by reading postings from Ahmadies. My dear just I will give
>you few examples and it will be very clear to any reasonable mind what are the
>meanings of "Khatam" or "Khatama" for that matter.

>1. THERE IS A HADITH WHICH SAYS THAT HOLLY PROPHET S.A.W. SAID " I AM
>KHATAMUNNIAEEN AND ALI IS KHATMUL-ULYA

   In which of the six famous Hadith books was this Hadith reported?
I would bet a couple of (Canadian) dollars that this Hadith was fabricated!

>2. HOLY QURAN IS SAID TO BE KHATMUL KUTAB.

   Who said it? Where? In what context?  

>3. BOO ALI SEENA IS WELL KNWON ARAB DOCTOR. IN EARLY ARAB LITERATURE HE HAS
>BEEN CALLED KHATAMUL HOKAMA.

   Who called him so? In what book?

>4. A GREAT ARAB POET (I FORGOT HIS NAME) IS WELL KNOWN TO ARABS AND THEY IN
>THEIR LITERATURE HAVE CLLED HIM KHATAMUL SHUARA.

   [His name is Abu-ttayyib Al-Mutanabbi.] Who called him so? In what
reference?

>NOW IF THE MEANING OF KHATAM IS TAKEN AS FINALITY IN TIME AND TRANSLATED AS
>LAST, THAN TELL ME THAT 

>1. IS THERE NO WALI IN MUSLIM UMMAH AFTER HAZRAT ALI?

   What is the definition of wali?

>2. NO BOOK HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN THE WHOLE WORD AFTER THE HOLY QURAN?
> ( IF YOU ARE IN YOUR SENSES)

   Koran in fact was called a book before it was revealed in total and yet
much before it was collected. When you say the book in some contexts it is
known to refer to Koran. When we say the Prophet it is known that he is
Muhammad while they are more than several other prophets!

>3.NO ONE HAD BECOME DOCTOR IN THIS WORD AFTER BOO ALI SEENA?

   Yes, many had, has and did!

>4. NO ONE HAD BECOME POET IN THE WORD SINCE THAT GREAT POET OF ARAB?

   Yes, many.

>ARE YOU REALLY IN YOUR SENSE ? OR YOU ARE NUTS?

   Are you talking to me? I am both! (Unless you are refering to peanuts.)

**Nabeel
From: memon@acsu.buffalo.edu (Naveed Siraj Memon)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Cigar Anyone?
Date: 10 Apr 92 23:17:54 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: UB

From: msaeed@isis.cs.du.edu (Sajid Saeed (Floyd? Nah!!!))
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Have you driven a Floyd,lately?
Summary: Floyd'ian blues! Jump the bandwagon.

>Interesting discussion we havin' at Pink Floyd's expense! Anyone else care to
>join, or is it just me and...

				>sajid [Sniper at the gates of Pasadena!] Saeed


Scp has provided a lot of insight about the Pakistani people. When the 
discussion about the Blues was going on, somebody did suggest that it did
not make sense to talk about Blues and PF on SCP. People enjoy different
things to say the least and while we could enjoy talking about Western music
that has moved us then we can certainly talk about it from the desi perspective
as if attempting to justify these articles on SCP :).
When I made a subtle hint at the similarity of our folk music and the blues
nobody seemed to be jumping on the bandwagon so I considered it something that
other desis may not have realised and may not find too amusing to talk about
on SCP. 
I know that atleast I enjoy reading what other people listen to and no I dont
want to read the 2000 articles on alt.rock. So I would hope that the show 
would go on :)





Shine on you crazy diamonds




Naveed[btw which one's pink] Memon
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: aq0@engr13.uark.edu (Amer Qureshi)
Subject: Re: aik nasihat
Organization: University of Arkansas
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 18:43:55 GMT

salama@topaz.ucq.edu.au writes:


>
>Woh loag jo fazool qism ki bahas main paR kar apna aur doosroN ka waqt
>zaia kartey hain un ke leay aik nasihat:
>      Allah ke bundo! aqal ke nakhun lo. kion apna waqt burbad kertey 
>ho. Purho, likho, mulk ka naam roshan kro. Aman wo ashti kee bateN kro,
>mail milap ka tuzkrah kro. Achchi, achchi baten kro. Aur ye nasihat
>hamesha yaad rakho. Shabash BuchoN. Salam.
>


YEH KEHAN KI DOSTI HEI, KEY BANE HEIN DOST NASIH....

Amer Qureshi..
From: 3040_3744@uwovax.uwo.ca
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: A Hindu,s and a Mulim's reply
Date: 6 Apr 92 14:03:35 EST

In article <11906@tamsun.tamu.edu>, gagrawal@cs.tamu.edu (Gopal Agrawal) writes:
> In article <92097.04382432JMVQG@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU> 32JMVQG@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (Mahfooz Ahmed Jafry) writes:
>>Salam Alaikum :  'Ham Aagai to garmie bazar dekhna'
>>
>>       Eid Mubarak to muslims only.  I do not know why Ummnoor is extending Eid
>> greetings ?  Whether he is a muslim ?  In Eid's hama hami, he started counting
>> himself among muslims ? Ch khoob ?  Baske mushkil hai her ek kam ka asan huna,
>>yani Qadiyani ka musulman hoona, further more, ummnoor sent me Eid Mubarak thro
>>ugh e-mail, I need help from Brothers like Murad Mirza, Jamal Mubrak and Irfan
>>Hyder that what I do in response ?  Eid is restricted to muslims only but ummno
>>or and Qadiyanese 'phir purshishe jarahat dil ku chala hai ishq' .... please he
>>lp me, help me, my sheikh said, no and no, do not say Eid Mubrak to Qadiyani,,w
>>hat I do now :  Can anobody complete this :
>>
>>             'Guunchai na shagufata ko door say mat dekha ke yun
>>                       .................................             Ghalib
> 
> This is undoubtedly one of your most funniest post. I tried to refrain from
> replying to your posts, but I couldn't help it. You have that irresistible
> quality that can bend me against my will. 
> 
> Now please accept "Eid Mubark" from this hindo. I am not Qadiyani. 
> I will also send you personal e-mail to wish you happy eid. If it
> makes you wince, then you can ask Jamal Mubarak & Irfan & Murad 
> sahibs to flame me ;-) . Perhaps they can help you in restraining non-
> muslims from extending eid greetings. 
> 
> regards,
> 
>     _____ ______ ______ ______ __  |\/\/\/|
>     ____/  __  /  __  /  __  /  /  |  \  /|   LIFE'S COMPLEX - IT HAS 
>    / __   /   /  /   /  /   /  /   | (o)(o)   REAL & IMAGINARY PARTS  
>   /   /  /   /   ___/  __  /  /    C      _) 
> _____/ _____/ __/   __/ __/ ______/ | \___|  
> E-mail - gagrawal@cs.tamu.edu       |   /   All Std. Disclaimers apply.


I am glad that a Hindu is more rational than the so called Mulim who is so
narrow minded that incontrary to his own relegious teachings he can not extend
greetings to a Mulim who's beleif is not same as him. Not only that but he even
is so closed minded that he even can not accept greetings from that person. I
could just say that INNA LILLAH-E-WAINNA ALEHA RAJEOON. Its very pitty on these
close minded so called muslims. Terrible time on Islam?
Munawar
  
>
From: waseems@sco.COM (Waseem Siddiqi)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Islam on Marriage
Date: 15 Apr 92 06:05:35 GMT
Organization: SCO Canada, Inc.

Hello Folks,

   The reason I'm suddenly interestd in this area is that I've reached 
that age where ...aah, how shall I put it..innocent references to the
m-word has suddenly increased in frequency at the dinner table. :-)

   I suppose I have to deal with it. All this time I've been comforting
myself by rationalising that what father would give his daughter to
a crazy person like me (who likes Van M, sixties songs, Iqbal and
Ghalib... beat that!) :-) :-)  Lately I've been having that sinking
feeling that there may be such demented people out there. :-) 

  I'd like to find out more about the Islamic viewpoint on marriage
spec. relating to our way of carrying out this act of bond (rishta lagana,
mehndi,butt,baraat,jahez,valima etc- the whole gamut) I realise a lot
of out traditions in marriage are borrowed and are not entirely correct.
I am spec. interested in our method of finding a partner i.e arranged
marriages. How do all these stand w.r.t Islam ?

    Will some learned member of SCP care to illuminate me on this subject ?
I'd also be interested in finding out about books that deal with this 
issue. I am also interested in hearing personal views of SCPians on
this topic.


-- 
Waseem A. Siddiqi                                 Tel:    (416) 922 1937 
SCO Canada                                        email: waseems@sco.com 
Toronto, Canada                                        uunet!sco!waseems
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: Wessiah (Son of Woman)
Subject: Thanks (to Noor)
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 04:08:18 GMT

umnoor@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Nasir Ahmed Noor) writes:

[Deletions to save]

>You are not worth my time. You have proved to be of a special breed of
>Maulvis who are paid to be just garbage excretors. Compare yourself 
>to Mr. Mubarak, Mr. Son of Woman, etc and you will come to know
>the difference between a knowledgeable person and the one who can only
>shout abuses from outside.

   Thanks for appreciating our manners and style in debate. If I did not
believe that you are most likely a malicious corruptor of religion I would
have shown you how nice a son of a fantastic woman can be.

--Wes
From: ahmad@seas.gwu.edu (Aftab Ahmad)
Subject: Re: GALATI MERY
Organization: George Washington University
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 05:08:00 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.011616.26374@prism.poly.edu> ahussain@prism.poly.edu (Arshad Hussain) writes:
>
>Please  read lat line of my post regading Mr. Maudoodi's testimoney
> 'No' which I meant, 
              ^^^ ^^^             ^^^^^^^^                ^^^^^^^^^^

How should we read the first line of this article. Sir I don't mean to
be funny but a cool mind can definitely perform better. And yes
I thought you have changed your view on Mr. Maudoodi.

>
>I am expecting some nice letters  regading my mistake.

No reply expected.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: jamal@z.eecs.umich.edu (Jamal Mubarak)
Subject: Re:  A little fact I want you to know (Son of Woman)
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 05:29:19 GMT

In article <4APR199219364452@zeus.tamu.edu> hbr6165@zeus.tamu.edu (harish) writes:
>
>	What I really don't understand is that the victory JM claims..

Please note that I have never used the word victory to describe my
own posts in this debate.

>As far as I can see, I never had the opportunity to see a single
>(specific..) posting by JM which could convincingly answer all Mr. Noor's
>questions.. I do remember a guy (a learned scholar..) from MIT

I am quite surprised.  All I ask anyone who wants to argue with
me on the subject is this.  Show me *one* dictionary of Arabic
or *one* lexicon of Arabic grammar which has the Ahmedi inter-
pretation of the word and I will believe that *one* meaning is
"best."  Am I being unreasonable?  To the contrary, Mr Noor has
been claiming all along the the word *never* means "last," in
spite of a plethora of easily verifiable dictionaries having
been referred to.

Can any of the three Ahmedis who have been arguing on the meaning
of this word even admit that *one* meaning of the word khatam is
"last"?

>	Another intersting thing I happened to observe is that.. 
>Noor had a long (rather long..)
>article on Khatam (spelling..??) to which neither JM nor anybody 
>replied it convincingly (or satisfactorily..) Inspite of that JM 
>repeatedly claims victory and also claims to have won completely 
>over Noor on that subject..

Which article was that?  What did I not reply to convincingly?
Can you give a reference to the post or are references hard to
come by even for this?

>these things only through these postings.. Now, if in a discussion
>one guy stops all of a sudden and starts claiming victory.. then..!
>as a outsider.. it is a bit too confusing for him..

Have I claimed victory or has Mr Noor said that I am claiming victory?
I am merely stating that I do not have a single verifiable reference
available to me that can convince me.  And did I stop posting or have
the Ahmedis stopped posting?

>	I have no bias or anything.. I like sensible discussion.. 

That sounds familiar.

>	I am sure JM will ask me to look through the ftp sites..

Not at all.

>better appreciate if JM could could select that specific article on Khatam
>from the ftp site, which, (as he claims) is yet to be answered by
>Mr. Noor.. that will clear a lot of confusion..

All I ask, Mr Harish is one reference.  I have posted nineteen.

>-Harish

Jamal [the entomological etymologist] Mubarak




Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: ahmad@ec.ecn.purdue.edu (Rashid Ahmad)
Subject: A Poem by Faiz.
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 22:49:51 GMT

         Here is a masterpiece from Faiz. It is not published in 'Nuskha
Hai Wafa' but Iqbal Bano has sung it.

      Ham dekhen ge.
      Lazim hai ke ham bhi dekhen ge.
      Ham dekhen ge.
      Woh din ke jis ka waada hai.
      Jo loh-e-azal men likha hai.
      Ham dekhen ge.
       
      Jab zulm-o-sitam ke koh-i-garan roiee ki tarah urh jaeen ge.
      Ham mehkoomon ke paoon tale yeh dharti dhar dhar dharke gi.
      Aur ahle hakam ke sar oopar jab bijli kar kar karke gi.
      Ham dekhen ge.

      Jab arz-e-Khuda ke Kaabe se sab but uthwae jaeen ge.
      Ham ahl-e-safa, mardood-e-haram masnad pe bithae jaeen ge.
      Sab taaj uchale jaeen ge, sab takht girae jaeen ge.
      Ham dekhen ge.

      Bas naam rahe ga Allah ka jo ghaib bhi hai hazir bhi.
      Jo nazir bhi hai manzar bhi.
      Uthey ga Innal-Haq ka naara, jo men bhi hoon aur tum bhi ho.
      Aur raaj kare gi khalq-e-Khuda jo men bhi hoon aur tum bhi ho.
      Ham dekhen ge.