HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hasan@cs.washington.edu (Shams Hasan)
Subject: Re: A news item
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 92 23:28:00 GMT

In article <dbose.724885275@khamsin.aem.umn.edu> dbose@aem.umn.edu (Deepak Bose) writes:
>banarji@unixg.ubc.ca (Ajai Banarji) writes:
>
>>			A news item
>
>>			News-Dec 20
>
>>From Indian Consulate, Vancouver up to Dec 1
>
>>GENERAL
>>	The UAE government has expelled a large number of foreigners who were
>>said to be living there illegally. They include about 5000 Pakistanis and 300
>						       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>	 HA HA HA HA HA HA HA    !!!!!
>
>	 ISLAMIC SOLIDARITY  ZINDABAAD !!!!
>
>	 OIC    ZINDABAD !!!!!
>
>	 HO   HO   HO   HO  HO !!!!
>
>>Indians. They had been detained after participating in demonstrations 
>>protesting against the destruction of the Babri Masjid.
>	    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>	    HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!
>
>	     I AGAIN FEEL VERY SORRY FOR YOU PAKISTANIS !
>
>	     YOUR ALLAH DOESN'T SEEM TO BE VERY KIND TO YOU .
>
>	     WHAT'S THE MATTER ??????
>
>	     HO HO HO HO HO HO HO !!!!
>
>	     AND FINALLY :
>
>	     PAKISTAN ZINDABAAD !
>
>	     HE HE HE HE HE HE HE HE !
>
>		HEY !!  HEY !!!  SHAMS HASAN , WHERE ARE YOU ???
>
>		DON'T YOU HAVE TO SAY ANYTHING ON THIS, MY SWEETHEART !!
>		 

My dear Deepak Bose,

It was so sad to see Pakistanis and Indians living illegally in Dubai have to
be deported due to a peaceful protest. It almost broke my heart !

However, I am encouraged by your article, as I see you did pay attention to
my request, not to bide by people like Mr. Ghayalod, and others who my be
making an effort to force you to crawl back into the closet.

Now then,  to properly answer your fine article, I must first congradulate
the Indian school and educational system in producing such a fine specimen
of literary achievement as your goodself. You make Hindustan proud.

However, somehow, and I am at a loss to understand, the people, eg. other
fellow Americans who for their own reasons donot want to get involved at this
stage, donot seem to agree with me.

I wish you can send better articles next time, so, as the content and 
frequency of your articles increase, we can better grasp the uniqueness of
the culture, family background, and Indian environment.

I myself am highly partial towards you, and again, my collegues are at a loss
to figure out why. The only explanation I can give is, you are one amongst the
thousands of your bretheren in the US who has dared to crawl out from the 
closet in a brave and courageous manner. 

Notwithstanding is your extraordinary ability to express complex ideas and 
thoughts in so few words. 

Hindustaan forever Zindabaad, Paeendabaad.

Jai Hind. And may God give you more power to send more articles.

Best Regards,
Shams Hasan.





Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: RESPONSE TO AHMEDI'S
From: axrahim1@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu
Date: 14 Dec 92 19:33:29 CST
Organization: Wichita State University, Wichita, Ks

IF GHULAM AHMED WAS A TRUE MUSLIM THEN HE WOULD NOT HAVE DIED IN A BATHROOM.
SO PLEASE YOU MOTHER FUCKER AHMEDI'S DO NOT CALL YOUR SELF AS MULSIMS.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: bhuttam@woods.ulowell.edu (Bilal A. Bhutta  aka The Nukeman)
Subject: Re: Maah-e-Siyaam
Organization: Nuclear Eng. Dept, UMass-Lowell
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:37:30 GMT

In article <1gqc0pINNr79@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, khan@ces.cwru.edu (Mansoor Khan) 
writes:
> 
> 
> 	When is Ramazan starting? I will be going to the Sub-continent
> in few months and want to avoid Pakistan during Ramazan time.
> 
> Mansoor Khan
> Cleveland, Ohio.
> 

    According to computerized date conversion (Minaret 1.3) Ramadan 1,1413 
falls on Tuesday Feb. 23, 1993, and Eid-ul-Fitr would be on Wednesday 
March 24, 1993, meaning that the month of Ramadan would be 29 days long. As 
always, all date conversions for Islamic/lunar calender are estimates and not 
fixed like the Julian/solar calender. Gee would be nice to have Eid on 
Pakistan Day! Hope this helps. Wassalam.

Allah Hafiz,

Bilal A. Bhutta
---
   Nuclear Engineering Dept., Univ. of Massachusetts-Lowell
   Internet: bhuttam@woods.ulowell.edu, mbhutta@cs.ulowell.edu

     "The parable of those who spend their substance in the way of Allah is 
  that of a grain of corn: it groweth seven ears, and each ears hath a hundred 
  grains. Allah giveth manifold increase to whom He pleaseth: and Allah careth
  for all and He knoweth all things."
						Al-Qur'an 2:261

->  Well, the university doesn't pay me anything to be its public rep.!  :^)  <-
From: khan@ces.cwru.edu (Mansoor Khan)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Lakhnavi and Panjabi get into an arguement
Date: 18 Dec 1992 21:23:37 GMT
Organization: Computer Engineering and Science, Case Western Reserve University
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: george.ces.cwru.edu


	Lakhnavi and Panjabi get into too-too-mae-mae
	--------------------------------------------

	This time  a Lakhnavi dude and a Panjabi dude were  travelling
	from Karachi to Lahore  in a train. At the lunch time,
 	both got their  food out,  and began to enjoy it. But the lakhnavi
	guy  saw that the panjabi guy was  enjoying his food bit too much.
	While the lakhnavi guy was  careful not to   get his hands messy,
	make the least noise possible while eating, the panjabi dude
	had no such problems. He was using both hands  doing  justice to
	this chicken leg, while the curry was  dripping from his fingers.
	The lakhnavi baankaa just could not control any more and asked
	the panjabi guy "Jenaab! App kay yehaan Kuttay kyaa khaatey hai'n?"
	Panjabi guy was too busy eating but  replied  
	"Oay, Hemaarey kuttay kuch'h bhee khaa'en,  jaisay bhee khaa'en
	 lekin  paan nahi'n khaatey" :-)

Mansoor
Cleveland
From: fall217@cse.unl.edu ()
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: Washington Ready to Brand Pakistan a Terrorist State
Date: 18 Dec 1992 22:59:07 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska--Lincoln	
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: cse.unl.edu

akfs@unity.ncsu.edu (Ashwini NMI Kumar) writes:

>Its about time that US wakes up to the fact that Pakistan is a
>terrorist states....

>the news made my day!

>Jai Hind.

 Yes pakistan is a terrorist country for those B. and sob who dont know the
rights of the human being. From Khalistan to Nepal every one is herased by the 
follish Indian myth of police man of subcontinent.  India is not more than a dog of USA which starts barking when USA want to pressureize pakistan and other
 countries like srilanka bangladesh maldives etc
I dont know when India will realise that their is some thing called pect of the rights of others but the countries which can not protect a masjid from the bunch
 of punks how it will protect the whole country
India better ask pakistani Army to protect their country.  Thousand of made in
India policemem and Paramillitry could not controll an unarmed crowd.  It is 
really very shamefull for any country but for the atomic power.

But when there was a sell for shame India gave away all its shame to buy some bombs.




Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.indian
From: sjayanth@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Satyanand V. Jayanthi)
Subject: Re: Sati's history
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 18:20:22 GMT

In article <168BD8BDA.MEKAN@IBRDVM1.WORLDBANK.ORG> MEKAN@IBRDVM1.WORLDBANK.ORG (Moazzam A. Mekan) writes:
>It has been said that the practice of Sati started in India with muslim
>invaders in order to protect women from being violated.  The question then
>is that why was the practice limited to married women only whose husbands had
>died or had been killed.  Surely, if the idea was to protect women against
>sexual abuse, both married and unmarried women should have been given the
>same "protection".  Besides, just out of curiosity, why would the muslim
>invaders prefer to "violate" married women and not virgins?

Good question, as to the preference of muslim rulers..god knows what they were,
but as far as the killing them selves on flames goes...The practise is this
way,

If they were doomed, all the women jump into flames (wifes,daughters,sisters,
..everyone) then the rajputs would come out for one final assault, the aim
being to inflict as damage as they can on the enemy before they die.

If the women did not commit jauhar (sati),before the assault, which means that
they still had hopes of a victory, then incase her husbands fall victims and
the battle lost, then only the queens killed themselves on their husband's pyre.

If you are interested, I can post some information, based exclusively on
arabic and persian accounts as to how the muslim hordes treated the captives.
Mind you, they are not hindu accounts...persian and arab accounts..
It is horrifyingly disgusting, making one shiver as how those people ever
endured that...barbarians is too mild a word to describe those people
who perpetuated that.

Narain(fro a friend's account)
narain@bass.bu.edu

Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.bangladesh
From: towheed@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov (NSSDC/NASA/HUGHES STX (301)286-6695)
Subject: Re: Victory Day in Bangladesh!!!
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:11:00 GMT

In article <92351.181548U54479@uicvm.uic.edu>, REHAN U. HAQUE. <U54479@uicvm.uic.edu> writes...
>In article <BzBwoz.GLG@news.udel.edu>, khaleq@brahms.udel.edu (Mohame
>Khalequzzaman) says:
>>
>>
> 
> 
>>Show your courage and greatness today to the Bangladeshi people by
>>apologizing for the atrocities organized by your previous generations.
>>
>>Khaleq

>APOLOGIZE! FOR WHAT!

**>  Let me tell you what you should apologize for.

	For the sins of your fathers and their brothers,
	For the rape of thousands of my sisters and mothers;
	For the death of the my Uncle and his friend.

	For letting the drunks in uniform enter our holy mosques,
	For skinning alive the our hindu friend,
	For the destructions of our homes and town,
	For the murder of our brightest sons - the poet, the healer 	
	and the guide;
	
	You should alologize for the tyrant who said that I din't
	have a language,
	For the bastard who said that all was well in the Eastern 
	wing,
	For the swine who said, "We don't need the people, only the 
	land !"

	You should apologize to my brother without legs,
	to my sister without hope, to my mother without sons;
	You should apologize to the innocence lost and the lives
	destroyed;

	BUT MOST OF ALL you should apologize for the silence
	of your fathers;
	You should apologize on their behalf for sitting around
	while we were raped and killed.  Where the hell were good
	Pakistanis when we were crying out help ?  How come the
	whole world came to the aid of Bangladesh, but the good 
	people of Pakistain just sat still.  

	OR were they stupid enough to think that the war was between
	Hindus and Muslims ?

	I suspect it was a case of chicken shit mixed with moral paralysis.

>	So, you should read up on you history, and when ever you come
>	across a Bangladeshi you should kiss his feet and say sorry on 
	behalf of your spineless fathers who were too afraid to stand to 
	the butchers that the BLACK, GUTLESS, STUPID, CULTURELESS bangalis 
	kicked all the way to hell !

	Syed S. Towheed (Long live the Bangali people, hell to 
				Pakistani cowards  ! )
From: khan@ces.cwru.edu (Mansoor Khan)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Lakhnavi and Panjabi become buddies
Date: 18 Dec 1992 21:07:12 GMT
Organization: Computer Engineering and Science, Case Western Reserve University
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: george.ces.cwru.edu


		Lakhnavi and Panjabi become buddies
		-----------------------------------

	These two guys, a lakhnavi and a panjabi  were  travelling in a
	train.  After a while, the panjabi guy asks this lakhnavi dude
	that what his name was. the lakhnavi guy says 

	"Iss naacheez, zaat-e-haqheer, khaaksaar ko Navab Muhammad Ahmed Khan
         kehtay hai'n." He futher asked "Aur aap kaa ism-e-shareef?"

	The panjabi dude was confused. He thought that when this big shot
	navab is being so humble, he has to be even more humble...
	So he replied,
	"Moojh kameenay, naalaa-iq, kuttay kee aulaad ko XYZ kehtay hai'n." :-)

P.S. Ism-e-Shareef == Good Name

Mansoor Khan
Cleveland



Xref: sparky soc.culture.pakistan:18073 soc.culture.indian:40603
From: shamim@spruce.egr.msu.edu (Tariq Shamim)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.indian
Subject: Re: *** Revenge, Temples destroyed
Date: 13 Dec 92 16:50:58 GMT
Organization: College of Engineering, Michigan State University

In article <Bz3rov.JL6@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v079rbu4@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Sanjay Kohli) writes:
|> In article <1992Dec11.052527.19545@leland.Stanford.EDU>, arkay@leland.Stanford.EDU (Abdur Khan) writes...
|> >In article <Bz2sy9.Gzz@ns1.nodak.edu> sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (The Purple Bleeder ) writes:
|> >>Again our great Indian Govt. has *back-stabbed* the Hindus
|> >>by pledging to rebuild the Babri mosque without even
|> >>bothering to mention as to what they will do on the
|> >>destroyed temples in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.
|> > 
|> >You got to be joking !!!!! if all *hindus* think like you,
|> >than god save the minorities in India.
|> 
|> Stop making these hepocratic statements. Most of you are fanatics any way 
|> don't try to show that you are different than rest of the bastards.
|> 
|> >You destroyed a mosque, pay for your crimes.
|> >The people responsible for all the bloodshed and destruction are the *hindus*
|> >( hindus with *'s, not all of them).  Why are you holding other countries 
|> >responsible for it.
|> > 
|> >>
|> >>Did the Govts. of Pak and B-desh ever pledge or even mention
|> >>of helping to reconstruct these temples.........
|> > 
|> >pakistan govt. has announced ...................
|> >Our Honourable Prime Minister has announced the rebuilding of all temples
|>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|> >and monetary compensation fro all affected families.
|>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
|> 
|> Where was your this Honourable Bastard when they stoned 10 hindu kids to
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 Mind your language, you son of a ...... 
|> death. 
|> 
|> 
|> >>Indian Govt...again has showed its lack of balls.
|> >>Afterall the Hindus are *EXPENDIBLE* in the eyes
|> >>of our vote hungry Govt.
|> >>
|> >>S.H
|> > 
|> >If the indian govt. has shown a lack of balls, you are showing 
|> >a lack of judgement.  The govt. wants to ensure harmony and peace
|> >in the country for which they willing to rebuild the 
|> >mosque, whats wrong ????
|> 
|> Everything don't you fuckin get it India is for Indian not for spineless 
                                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|> bastards!
   ^^^^^^^^^ 
That's why they kicked you out of India.
|> 
|> >presently as far as *hindus* are concerned muslims/mosques are
|> >expendable.
|> > 
|> >sahibzada rafay khan
|> 
|> 
|> Cheers
   
Tariq.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: aam9n@honi1.acc.Virginia.EDU (Ali Ahmad Minai)
Subject: Re: Pakistan
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 05:52:07 GMT

In article <samaddar.724448110@dumbo> samaddar@siemens.com writes:
>hyder@cs.utexas.edu (Syed Irfan Hyder) writes:
>
>>JUst imagine 1920s and Babri Masjid type riots happening every
>>second year, and you will understand whehter Pakistan was formed
>>for "human rights" or for Muslims.
>
>....
>IMHO, creation of Pakistan left the secure muslims (in muslim-majority
>areas) even more secure and the vulnerable muslims (in muslim-minority
>areas) even more vulnerable because the anger felt by many hindus over
>the division of the motherland would be now directed towards this
>vulnerable group of muslims.

Very well put. This is greatest Achilles heel of the whole Two Nation
argument, which is why, in all the volumes of propagandistic "history"
put out in Pakistan, there is hardly any mention of this issue. As
Sumitro elegantly points out, if the Two Nation Theory had a basis
in truth, Partition was exactly the *worst* thing to do, given the
demographics of India. And it is precisely those who think in terms
of the Muslim "ummah" who should have been most concerned about it
(and some were, though they changed their spots after Partition).
Of course, if the Two Nation Theory had no justification then Partition
was not necessary anyway.

My own opinion is that Partition was driven less by the philosophical idea
of two nations and more by its internal dynamics, where it became virtually
a Muslim nationalist movement. We must also remember that those who advanced
the idea of Pakistan on the basis of the Two Nation Theory (most prominently,
Iqbal) did not envisage two separate countries, but a federation of partly
autonomous states. To ask for a separate country was to give up all say in
what happened to the Muslims who remained behind in India. However, once
the idea was in the air, it was snatched away by radicals who ran with it,
seeing an opportunity for political power.

Of course, it is much easier to philosophize with the advantage of hindsight,
and I'm sure many of the political decsions taken in the 1940's were taken
because the alternatives were politically impossible. Our task is neither
to lament what happened nor seek to undo it, but to ensure that its benefits
are maximized and its harm controlled. As I have said before, we must bury
our petty prejudices.
>
>When Advani incited the destruction of the Babari mosque, he ignored
>the possible reaction on hindus in Sindh (his birthplace). When "Aligarh"
>muslim elites forced a division of India, they ignored the possible effect
>on the remaining muslims in India.

Not all of them. Several among the Aligarh crowd remained behind in India.
Dr. Zakir Husain is an example. My own grandfather, who was very pro-Partition,
stayed in Aligarh despite offers of the highest Pakistani offices. His reason:
he thought educated Indian Muslims should stay in India to protect the interests
of Indian Muslims. It must have been a bitter lesson in the difference between
theory and reality.

Ali Minai
From: murtza@andromeda.rutgers.edu (THE SANDMAN)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: FUCK ALL PAKIS
Date: 15 Dec 92 15:59:42 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

ikram@qr.cas.uec.ac.jp (Syed Ikram Hussain) writes:
>   YAAR DUKH HI HOWA !

>   BACHON KI THARA LARTAY HO.




>guys let us try not to be stupid in civilized society,(if you believe your self civilized)

Hey dude read my article, it says that such bickering on the net is useless
if you think that this is stupid in this "civilized society" well then perhaps
you need to rethink your definition of "stupid". I would also like to advise
you not to be so hasty is critisizing others, its vey easy to do but it also means that you are making the assumption that you are right which is essentially
not always true. So next time think before you leap, rather than acting like
a wise guy.

Peace to the B.A.

Rabh Raakha

Shamoun Murtza
(THE SANDMAN)

-- 
*DEATH TO THE 'DUSHMANS' OF PAKISTAN		* SHAMOUN MURZTA              *
*WHO SAYS THAT I AIN'T RIGHT . . . .		* RUTGERS UNIVERSITY	      *
*LIFE IS FOR MY OWN TO LIVE MY OWN WAY		* PH: (201) 997-2685          *
*				-METALLICA     	* PAKISTAN ZINDABAD.	      *
From: hyder@cs.utexas.edu (Syed Irfan Hyder)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: A query
Date: 14 Dec 1992 16:01:24 -0600
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: pageboy.cs.utexas.edu

In article <Bz9GJI.FJ0@acsu.buffalo.edu> v999r9ne@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Vikram S Sinha) writes:
>I have travelled to pakistan on numerous occasions with friends and 
>family.I noticed a strange trait amongst the pakistani people. I have
>observed that first cousins marry each other in most cases, this

>mutation of the offspring eventually. I am sure islam does not condone this
>and I have met muslims from other countries too,they say that this practice
>is totally alien to them. They like many others find this practice of 
>marrying ones paternal or maternal uncle's or aunt's offspring disgusting.

What types of Muslims you have been meeting. Quran explicity mentions
the people whom one can NOT marry. If some Muslims from some areas
have peculiar predilections about certain groups in this regard, then,
what Islam has to do with that??

4:22-23

22. And marry not woman whom your fathers married, except
what has already passed; this surely is indecent and hateful, and
it 15 an evil way.

23. Forbidden to you are your mothers and your daughters
and your sisters and your paternal aunts and your maternal
aunts and brothers' daughters and sisters' daughters and your
mothers that have suckled you and your foster-sisters and mothers
of your wives and your step-daughters who are in your guardianship,
(born) of your wives to whom you have gone in, but if you
have not gone in to them, there is no blame on you (in marrying
them), and the wives of your sons who are of your own loins
and that you should have two sisters together, except what has
already passed; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
------




Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.bangladesh
From: MEKAN@IBRDVM1.WORLDBANK.ORG (Moazzam A. Mekan)
Subject: Re: Sati's history
Organization: WORLD BANK
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 14:56:42 GMT

It has been said that the practice of Sati started in India with muslim
invaders in order to protect women from being violated.  The question then
is that why was the practice limited to married women only whose husbands had
died or had been killed.  Surely, if the idea was to protect women against
sexual abuse, both married and unmarried women should have been given the
same "protection".  Besides, just out of curiosity, why would the muslim
invaders prefer to "violate" married women and not virgins?
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.afghanistan,soc.culture.turkish,soc.culture.iranian,soc.culture.asean,soc.culture.arabic
From: bazyar@teal.csn.org (Jawaid Bazyar)
Subject: Re: Wakeup Muslims + Uncle Sam
Organization: Colorado SuperNet, Inc.
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 04:54:38 GMT

afadel@nyx.cs.du.edu (Ayman Fadel) writes:

>Jawaid, would you explain why you use the term "we" in describing
>your relationship to actions of the U.S. government?

1)  Because the US Government is composed of our elected representatives
2)  It's easier than typing "US Government" every time. :)

-- 
 Jawaid Bazyar              |   Ask me about the GNO Multitasking Environment
 Procyon, Inc.              |   for the Apple IIgs!   
 bazyar@cs.uiuc.edu         |   P.O Box 620334
 --Apple II Forever!--      |   Littleton, CO 80162-0334   (303) 933-4649
From: hyder@cs.utexas.edu (Syed Irfan Hyder)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: Saeed-uz-Zafar where are you?
Date: 14 Dec 1992 01:23:07 -0600
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: pageboy.cs.utexas.edu

In article <Bz7t6M.E6A@sunfish.usd.edu> shariq@charlie.usd.edu writes:
:Saeed wherever you are please reply back to me! Saeed is from Al Nahda School

Aaaawaaaaaz they kahaaaaaaN hai.......


Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: nadeem@ethz.ch (Nadeem Malik)
Subject: test
Reply-To: nadeem@p.igp.ethz.ch
Organization: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, CH
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:50:33 GMT


test
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Cricket GIFS
From: shariq@charlie.usd.edu
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 00:41:18 GMT
Reply-To: shariq@charlie.usd.edu
Organization: The University of South Dakota Computer Science Dept.

Anybody out there have cricket GIFS. I amm really desperate to get some. Can 
anybody out there help me, ? There was a guy by the name of Greg Wh...... He
had them them but now he is nowhere to be found!Help!!!!!!

Shariq

Hail Pakistan,the world champions of the greatest game ever