From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Peter, do you even know how to READ? (Was: 3 docs in a 3-way).
Keywords: You expect me to mark my deletions?  Dream on...
Date: 14 Sep 1992 17:10:11 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Not until it quits raining.

In article <192brnINNpbo@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>, regard@sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
>In article <nyikos.716335245@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
>>In <18novvINN6jc@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
>>
>>What a grotesque distortion.
>>Did you also read the part where I say you seem to 
>> have shown no signs of growing
>>as a human being in the past 7 years?  Your distortion reinforces this
>>impression.
>
>Peter,
>
>Careful now, fella.
>
>I have a copy of a posting of yours, not more than 2 months old, I believe,
>where you state you had been on the net less than 7 days.  
>
>Now, unless you were *lying* (this is merely a clause in the sentence, not
>an accusation, you understand -- I wouldn't dream of accusing you of such
>a despicable thing....) you wouldn't have much experience to base the
>statement above upon, now would you?  You haven't been party to the large
>amount of those 7 years to observe or not observe 'growing as a human being'
>in any way, have you?
>
>But you couldn't be speaking through your *hat* again, now could you?

Does he have anything in his hat to start with?  That's what I'd like to know,
after he littered my mailbox with a demand that I post his demands (actually,
a lot of whining that I apologize to some kid at CSUS :) because of his 
"problems" with the newsreader at USC...talk about your basic clueless newbie.

>(You will notice that line was concluded with a "?".  That indicates a 
>question.  Just thought I'd mention it since you seem to have trouble with
>such signs.)  
>
>>>Kinda makes me *glad* you have decided I'm not on your list of 'compassionate'
>>>people, because I wouldn't like the company, or the definition.
>>
>>I'm beginning to hatch a bit of speculation, not backed up yet by any solid
>>facts, mind you, that just as Dennis Hall is alleged to be a fictional name
>>of Steve Chaney, just so   Adrienne Regard      is a fictional name for
>>                            drieux
>>or vice versa.  
>
>
>drieux!  Now *there's* company I would appreciate. 

I guess that's what's wrong with a LOT of us -- we appreciate drieux's company
more than we do Peter's...

>Yeah, do that, Peter.  Cross drieux and I right off your list of 'people'.
>That's the "compassionate" thing to do:  make a whole list of excuses for
>a fellow who swore to God or Allah that he would have killed a woman, but
>by all means, disqualify drieux and I from the company of people because we
>haven't done such 'excusable' things.....
>
>You really haven't a clue how much damage you do yourself, do you, Peter?
>
>Note that question mark again.

What's scary about this guy is that he's in the *faculty* directory at USC.
It's a safe bet *my* stepdaughter isn't going to be getting her secondary
education at USC, for sure.  (South Dakota State, more likely. :-)


--PLH, Sharpstown's SlackMeister for "Bob" (and devoted attendant to Dale Ann
the Devious, whose recovery is progressing very well, thank you all who asked
very much...)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion