HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: babs@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (Babs Woods)
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Organization: Our Lady of Perpetual Mirth (Pacifica)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 00:12:09 GMT


In <krngbkINNt59@male.EBay.Sun.COM> peewee@playhouse.EBay.Sun.COM (Philip H. Stromer) writes:

>	Lawrence Foard asks:
>	What if you have just given men hand jobs and blow jobs? Does
>	heavy petting count?  What about transexuals?

>First off, Lawrence the Lubricator, don't cross-post flames from
>this forum onto the fag newsgroups.  I understand that since you
>can't cross-dress on e-mail, cross-posting is your substitute,
>but stop it anyway.

>If a man.........kisses or hugs another man, he's a fag.

Well, this'll be news to a number of the straight men I know.

>Transexuals are automatically fags, 

Boy, have you got a lot to learn.

>whether or not they do anything else.  I *love* women's titties, but 
>not so much that I want to chop off my balls and grow my own tits.  

Who says you have to?  Are you that threatened by people who are
different than your puny small-minded self that you feel that their
very presence is a demand that you become like them, against your will? 
I'll bet you're a christian.  They think everyone should be just like
them and, by god, they're going to makeover everyone else in their own 
distorted image of their own perfection, no matter what the objections. 

>I'm perfectly normal.  

If what you are constitutes *normal*, then this society is far worse off 
than even I have been thinking it has become.  If narrow-minded,
deliberately uninformed, insensitive, bigotted, sex-obssessed-and-
panicked self-righteousness is the norm, then this is a sad place to be 
living.

>If I loved tits so much that I grew my own, then I'd be a fag.  Get it? 

If you loved women as much as you crow about, you'd simply be with
some woman enjoying her presence in your life, and being present with
her.  You wouldn't be spending your time crowing about possessing some 
section of her anatomy, as if sexuality and ornamentation were all that 
was important about women.  

	Men who have to yell and scream about the threat of
homosexuality and  who label any physical contact or display of
affection between men as evidence of homosexuality, ridiculing those 
who display affection towards other males, have some serious problems 
of their own.  Men who objectify women, or, worse still, sections of 
their anatomy seperate from who the woman is, also have some serious
problems. 

	You are engaging in both.  I think you have some serious
personal problems.  Don't you think it would be better to take them to 
someone qualified to help you and not people all too willing to crucify 
you for those problems?  Are you that much of a masochist that you
wish to continue to open yourself to our attacks?  Hmm?  

	Pop up again clown, and we'll hit you again.  And keep on
hitting you until you burst.

				-babs
-- 

"Excuse me, while I dance a little jig of despair."
	- hadley@ics.uci.edu (Tedd Hadley)
From: 70750.2052@Compuserve.Com ("Ronnie Jr.")
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Mark Kinney: Attention-Starved Child
Date: 7 Apr 92 19:23:20 GMT

In a desperate cry for attention, kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet
  (Mark Kinney, Asshole at Large) whines to K e n:

>Oh, I see. You can't handle being the target of *real* flames
>
Show me a "*real* flame"... yours are pathetic.

>So you start ignoring
>anyone who's obviously outflamed you recently, and then showing up again weeks
>later to claim a victory you weren't even in the race for to begin with.
>
Translation: "Waaaaaaaah!  Mommy, they keep ignoring me!  The other kids
won't acknowledge me when I try to play their game with them!  Waaaaaaah!"

Sorry Mark... Most people stopped falling for the "You won't play 'cause
you're afraid I'll beat you" trick long ago.  Your groveling, pleading
request to be flamed has been denied, you worthless liquid shit.


Ronnie Jr.
"Next thing, homos will want cables where two male ends plug together."
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6282 talk.politics.misc:17095
From: 6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Homosexuality in Alabama
Date: 7 Apr 92 02:51:28 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame

In article <Dw8uiB8w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:


>Problem is I keep popping up with the TRUTH..

>Now don't I? :-)

Care to share with me the truth, oh anointed one?  Show me the truth,
I'll show you a burning cross.

>-djk

How's the hood fit, bigot?

>-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' -

Yeah, like lynching.
From: sasrdt@shewhart.unx.sas.com (Randall D. Tobias)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Too much lossy encoding?
Keywords: PASC, audio, mindless flaming
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:09:47 GMT
    <1992Apr8.160300.5981@tc.fluke.COM> <1992Apr10.072719.28885@rp.CSIRO.AU> 
    <1992Apr10.114353@sees.bangor.ac.uk>
Organization: (none)
Originator: sasrdt@shewhart.unx.sas.com
X-Bytes: 977

In article <1992Apr10.114353@sees.bangor.ac.uk>, mather@sees.bangor.ac.uk (Paul Mather) writes:
|> In article <1992Apr10.072719.28885@rp.CSIRO.AU>, awoolf@rp.CSIRO.AU writes:
|> > In article <1992Apr8.160300.5981@tc.fluke.COM>, kurt@tc.fluke.COM (Kurt Guntheroth) writes:
|> > > Is it just me or is anyone else out there concerned that we are using lossy
|> > > encoding "too much" as a substitute for denser storage and better transmission
|> > > methods?
|>
|> [Much flaming deleted.]
|>
|> > Think very carefully next time about posting on something you don't understand.
|> > Usenet treats such people very harshly.........
|>
|> ...for some strange reason.  Take a pill and calm down please.

Seconded.
-- 

Randy Tobias               SAS Institute Inc.     (919) 677-8000 x7933
sasrdt@dev.sas.com         SAS Circle             (919) 677-8224 (Fax)
72450.2545@compuserve.com  Cary, NC   27512-8000

 ... just my $(-exp(2*sqrt(-1)*arcos(0))/(((2**(2 + 1)) - 1)**2 + 1)).
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6270 alt.politics.homosexuality:1789
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 20:56:48 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

twpierce@amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

> So?  If you marry a woman who has had a hysterectomy, neither can
> the two of you.  I guess you're unnatural, too ... after all,
> you made the _conscious choice_ to take up with that person.

That is 1 case out of a great many.  Name 1 case that to homosexual people
were able to do this?

> Is this a joke?  If not, get rid of that unnatural
> high-technology computer and let some other baseless cretin use
> it.
> 
> T, born with a silver CPU in his mouth

High technology has its place.  But its place is not to replace that which is
of nature.  That is destroying the planet as it is.



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
From: aap@wam.umd.edu (Alberto Adolfo Pinkas)
Subject: Re: Regrets
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 16:10:18 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.155657.3374@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> wooledge@ces.cwru.edu (Gregory Wooledge) writes:
>djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>
>>skaven@milton.u.washington.edu (William Gilliland) writes:
>>
>>> George Weinberg introduced the term homophobia in _Society and the Healthy
>>> Homosexual_ (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1972).
>>
>>Isn't that like saying 'society and the healthy alcoholic?'..
>
>Daniel, you are an ass.  I could get more meaningful output from a random
>number generator.
>
>How can you bear to live with yourself?  What defect in your psyche allows you
>to continue from day to day without killing yourself?


Psyche?
Did you said Psyche?
Holly cow, don't you know that Psyche is a forbidden word in this newsgroup???
Stop it, or maybe next time you will try to say that homosexuality might
come from a psychological disorder!!!

AAP


>
>You need help.
>-- 
>Greg Wooledge		/..\			Wizard in training.
>wooledge@ces.cwru.edu	\--/ Have a day.


Xref: sparky alt.flame:6539 alt.politics.homosexuality:1997
From: jcc@frog.UUCP (Jim Chagnon)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 11 Apr 92 00:37:00 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: CRDS

In article <w80ViB3w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:

>That IS part of the relationship though, actually a big part.   If the homo-
>sexual contact were really natural, it would produce offspring.  Sex is after
>all the act of reproduction.

 Well, Jack, you've got zero chance of reproducing when you masturbate...

 Guess that makes you as unnatural as the homosexuals, hey?

jcc

... hands on -top- of the bedsheets now,.......
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6717 alt.politics.homosexuality:2082
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 17:03:35 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner) writes:

> In article <07D6iB2w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

> >-djk :-))))))))))))))
> 
> Fuck you and the smiley you rode in on.
> 
> cws

Be the best one YOU ever had. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
From: bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This newsgroup has gone to hell!
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:44:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: atlantis.cn3wH-efr6
Reply-To: bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Distribution: na
Organization: PENN$YLVANIA $TATE UNIVER$ITY

In article <23158@goofy.Apple.COM>, lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
|> In article <zx+vHgmmk6@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@through.gis.psu.edu (Bruce
|> Bufalini) writes:
|> > 
|> > Yes, I am consistent in that no one other than K e n  and I can flame.  You
|> > certainly can't.
|> 
|> Heh.  The two of you together couldn't produce a worthwhile flame if you
|> were doused in turpentine and tossed in a blast furnace.

You are misinformed, as always.  There is no need to be doused in turpentine,
as we are not paint brushes; we are Bruce and K e n.  You appear to have the
intelligence of a paint brush.  Enough said.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6447 alt.politics.homosexuality:1929
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 9 Apr 92 15:56:08 GMT
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
> twpierce@amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
> > If they have made a CHOICE not to procreate, that doesn't mean
> > they CAN'T.
> 
> You keep twisting me words around.  What I said, and I will say it again,
> two male lovers cannot procreate and pass on BOTH of their DNA to the child.

If you're really worried about this, and if it's all that holds back the
legitimacy of homosexuality in your mind, then there's no reason why
technology can't solve that little problem.

"Ah," you say, "but technology isn't natural."

In which case, are you suggesting that infertile heterosexual couples should
be persecuted as "unnatural"?

Or are we at home to Mr. Double Standards?

> Therefore it is IMPOSSIBLE for them to have a natural child.

I think you mean "IMPOSSIBLE for them to have a child by purely natural
means".  Which is true of many heterosexual couples.


mathew
-- 
Civilization is just a temporary failure of entropy.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6871 alt.politics.homosexuality:2192
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 15 Apr 92 03:38:10 GMT
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

elf@polari.com writes:

> In article <eqF7iB4w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
> 
> >elf@polari.com writes:
> >> You're self-damning as it is.
> 
> >Problem is.. You are not in a position to be judging anyone.
> 
>    Of course I am!  Heheheh... You're the one who is in complete
> violation of your much-vaunted and -flaunted New Testament.  You're the
> one who's judgemental in spite of _your Gods'_ words stating that you
> should not be.
> 
>    Elf !!!
> 


It also says 'judge all things that they be made true'.....

In the OT it also has nastier words for gays then _I_ could
ever have sweetie. I am TAME (so is Artimus!!) compared to
those words.

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7069 alt.politics.homosexuality:2335
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 92 01:00:49 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

> Have you read the Old Testament in the original?  It has no words for
> gays, period.
> 
> -- 


Another G-D DAMNED LIE from the penis gallery. Sodomy, men porking
men and the rest are very sternly condemned.

Like it or not, thats the FACTS and no amount of 'gay activism' can
EVER refute those. 

Try again timmy.

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6618 alt.politics.homosexuality:2027 alt.sex:14246
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 03:51:31 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

sbl2@ellis.uchicago.edu (S.B. Lawsky) writes:

> Sorry for not reading carefully. True enough, 'homophope' is not
> in my dictionary. "Homophope" doesn't really see like a 'horror
> word,' though. As a matter of fact, I repeated it a mere three
> times and am now giggling. 
> 
> 


Me too........ Scoolyard politics always make me snicker.


-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
From: wooledge@ces.cwru.edu (Gregory Wooledge)
Subject: Re: Regrets
Organization: Crusaders for Truth
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 92 17:06:46 GMT

djk@homophobes.CtEdge.COM writes:

>fjvwing@cs.vu.nl (FJ!!) writes:
>
>> And much more than that. There is also, of course, being a lesbian.
>> 
>...And double headed dildoes.. So nice and normal. :)

It sounds like fun to me, even though I haven't had the opportunity to try
it yet.
-- 
Greg Wooledge		/..\			Wizard in training.
wooledge@ces.cwru.edu	\--/ Have a day.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6396 alt.politics.homosexuality:1882
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: SELFISH HOMOS USING INNOCENT CHILDREN TO LEGI
Date: 8 Apr 92 17:16:15 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <JoXgiB4w164w@Bogus.COM>, punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
> 
> The country also has a drug problem, does it REALLY exist, or is it just the
> figment of some one's warped imagination?

As a matter of fact, the "drug problem" _is_ a figment of George Bush's
imagination. While there isn't a drug problem, there _is_ a dope problem.

Too many dopes.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 15:05:38 GMT

In article <kH4aJB4w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
>
>> Hardly.  She IS rather dynamic, for we are still involved.  Short
>> memory, punk.
>
>Something must be wrong if you have to go to guys...

Something _is_ wrong -- but it's something wrong with _you_, punk.

>If you loved her, you wouldn't be playing house with anyone else.

A few SHORT messages ago, you told me that I had no right to judge the
quality or intensity of your relationships.  Now who the fuck are you
to tell me what we should and shouldn't be doing, punk?

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Well, there's homosexuality in all animals
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      / but one, and that's the pig.  If it weren't
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) / for homosexuals we'd all have to live like
                                 pigs." -- overheard at Sydney Mardi Gras
From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Where Karsten Likes To Do It
Date: 15 Apr 92 15:10:26 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <1992Apr14.192346.919@gacvx2.gac.edu>
karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) hems and haws:

KH:
>>>I don't play football, I play rugby

BK:
>> Same butt-patting, different country.

KH:
>Wrong, no butt-patting in rugby

Yeah, right.
From: bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Declaration of War on PSU
Date: 16 Apr 92 00:39:07 GMT
Article-I.D.: atlantis.f34wHa3rr6
Reply-To: bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Organization: PENN$YLVANIA $TATE UNIVER$ITY

In article <1992Apr15.130051.1347@wkuvx1.bitnet>, kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos) writes:
|> In article <sq2wH7=wq6@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
|> > In article <1992Apr14.114811.1330@wkuvx1.bitnet>, kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos) writes:
|> > |> In article <rg1wHn7_p6@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@across.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
|> > |> > In article <1992Apr12.152023.1315@wkuvx1.bitnet>, kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos) writes:
|> > |> > |> Then could you inform everyone on the net as to why one could take your name
|> > |> > |> off the post, put Ken's on, and no one could tell the difference?
|> > |> > 
|> > |> > Because we are both very informed.  Perhaps you need some clues.  Just ask us
|> > |> > if you need any; we have lots of them.
|> > |> > 
|> > |> If I needed a clue, I'd want one that would give me some idea of what's going
|>      ^^
|> > |> on, i.e. not from you or Ken.
|> > 
|> > Translation: Mr. Chaos likes to be and wants to be misinformed.  Our clues are
|> > extremely informative.  Still sure you don't want any?
|> > 
|> Oh, I see you missed the "if." Perhaps you could use some?

No, you misread my post saying that we had many informative clues.  Therefore,
I am not in need of any clues.

|> > |> > |> Or they're so intelligent accurate that they overload your underdeveloped
|> > |> > |> brains and lead you to not understand them.
|> > |> > 
|> > |> > My brain is fully developed, and has been every day of my life.  Your jealousy
|> > |> > will not get you anywhere.  Give up.
|> > |> 
|> > |> Jealous of a couple of half-wits who seem to have nothing better to do than
|> > |> type oggle and tell other people that they're misinformed? HA!
|> > 
|> > Show me one post of mine where I typed "OGGLE."  You appear to be lying.
|> 
|> Nope. Ken does type oggle. 

You still lied about it.  You said that we both type "OGGLE."  Since only
K e n  types it, your statement is half false.

|> > You still seem to be jealous about not having an underdeveloped brain, which
|> > you claim that I have, but do not.  
|> 
|> Why should I be jealous of you for three neurons you claim as a brain?

Because you don't have any.  You seem to thrive on asking moronic questions.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6227 alt.politics.homosexuality:1735
From: twpierce@amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 30 Mar 92 18:53:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: amherst.1992Mar30.145337.1
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA.

In article <w2iFiB2w164w@Bogus.COM>, punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:

> Two men cannot create a baby with BOTH their DNA.
> 
> Two women cannot naturally create a baby with BOTH their dna.

So?  If you marry a woman who has had a hysterectomy, neither can
the two of you.  I guess you're unnatural, too ... after all,
you made the _conscious choice_ to take up with that person.

> I heard somewhere where it was possible, but EXTREEMELY hard, that an egg
> could be fertalized without sperm...  I cannot vouch for the validity of this.
> 
> However, this is only possible with high technology.  We weren't put here on
> this earth with that ability!  Therefore its not natural.

Is this a joke?  If not, get rid of that unnatural
high-technology computer and let some other baseless cretin use
it.

T, born with a silver CPU in his mouth
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: OGGLEs Are FUCKING LAME!
From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 15:52:55 GMT
Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Keywords: Jack plays with blocks

In article <w96Hk6#o6@cs.psu.edu> krobinsn@cirith-ungol.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>In article <9204111238.48@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>In article <svHa-2m6@cs.psu.edu> krobinsn@osgiliath.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>In article <woDwiB3w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>>>>krobinsn@bree.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>
>>>>> OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE      
>>>>
>>>>> K e n   R o b i n s o n         
>>>>
>>>>You sir, are in dire need of repair.
>>>
>>>And you sir, are quite misinformed.
>>
>>And you are a misanthrope.
>
>And you sir, are quite misinformed.

What a clever comeback.

You might want to take a remedial english class.

-- 

Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.UUCP	unixland!rmkhome!rmk	rmk@frog.UUCP
Xref: sparky alt.sex:14067 alt.flame:6499
From: 6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner)
Newsgroups: alt.sex,alt.flame
Subject: Re: References to Women
Date: 10 Apr 92 21:12:42 GMT
Followup-To: alt.sex

>Amen Dan, my point as well. Insecurity is their worst problem, and
>people can't resist trying to get the insecure to just come off of it,
>since those who have grown out of acting that way know that all of us
>are really insecure anyway.    _ Steve Walz

Gee, Steve, you sure seem to have grown out of being insecure, posting
high quantities of bandwidth, calling people "shithead" and "twat".
What a useful life you must lead.  What a productive activity in
which to engage.  I'll bet most of the people reading this could give a
fuck what you think.  Since most of us stopped using mindless,
mysogynistic ad-hominems after sixth grade, its no wonder you are
still so insecure.

Hey Steve, would you enjoy working for a woman?  Would it bother you?
Would you have a harder time turning in projects, following 
instructions?

cws
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6659 alt.politics.homosexuality:2051 alt.sex:14296