HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lhotka@abel.incstar.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: MAILING LIST:  Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Date: 16 Apr 92 12:30:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: abel.2794.29ed7348
Organization: INCSTAR Corp, Stillwater MN

Announcing a new mailing list for discussions about

		COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING


The list's purpose is to provide a forum for discussion about topics
related to the use of computers in manufacturing.  Discussions may cover
hardware, software, process flow and control, MRP, JIT, cost accounting,
scheduling, etc.

INCSTAR Corp is a manufacturer of medical test kits and is a user of ASK's
MANMAN software running on VAX/VMS.  As host for this mailing list, INCSTAR
hopes to foster discussions about the use of computers in manufacturing on
all levels, from the manufacturer's viewpoint as well as from the MIS
viewpoint.

To subscribe to this mailing list, send a one line message with the word
'SUBSCRIBE' in the body of the message to:

	l-cim-request@adam.incstar.com

or send a one line message with the words 'SUBSCRIBE L-CIM' in the body of
the message to:

	LISTSERV@adam.incstar.com

Please direct any correspondence dealing with the list to
l-cim-request@adam.incstar.com.

 Rockford Lhotka                                INCSTAR Corp
 Applications Project Leader                    1990 Industrial Blvd
 lhotka@incstar.com                             PO Box 285
 612/779-1701                                   Stillwater, MN 55082
From: gkendall@ncr-mpd.FtCollins.NCR.COM (Guy Kendall)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 and Packet drivers
Date: 14 Apr 92 21:07:08 GMT
Reply-To: gkendall@ncr-mpd.FtCollins.NCR.COM (Guy Kendall)
Organization: NCR Microelectronic Products Division

In article <1992Apr7.221123.16485@mathcs.sjsu.edu> rick@mathcs.sjsu.edu (Richard Warner) writes:
>MS promised almost total compatibility between 3.0 and 3.1.  I would hold
>them to this promise, call their Windows tech support (I sure hope this is
>an 800 line), and tell them to provide a fix.  They advertised 
>compatibility - hold them to the fire.


How can they say that there is total compatibility between the two when
they took real mode out of 3.1? I know that no one in their right mind
would want to use real mode, but I do know of one program that requires
real mode.

-- 
Guy W. Kendall - Applications Engineer            Guy.Kendall@ColoSpgs.NCR.COM
NCR Microelectronic Products Division               Voice: 719-596-5795 x465
1635 Aeroplaza Drive                                  Fax: 719-570-6045
Colorado Springs, CO 80916                            BBS: 719-596-1649
From: nevries@accucx.cc.ruu.nl (Nico de Vries.)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: OS/2 - How much memory are you guys using?
Date: 16 Apr 92 19:51:02 GMT
Organization: Academic Computer Centre Utrecht

In <1992Apr16.033605.10972@r-node.gts.org> yung@r-node.gts.org (Amos Yung) writes:

>In article <1992Apr15.042707.22049@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> ujabanco@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (John Abanco) writes:
>>
>>I've got 4 Megs. I installed my free copy (from COMDEX) on my machine
>>once, and found disk access HORENDOUS. Someone told me that you need 6
>>Megs to do okay, and 8 Megs to run it good. 

>Gosh.. You too? I am running OS/2 2.0 on a 386-33 w/4M RAM and, putting
>it mildly, it is not as snappy as I would like. While the compatiability
>with DOS and Windows app is extremely impressive, it is not a "better DOS
>than DOS, better Windows than Windows" in terms of performance.

Are you running HPFS of superFAT. If you are running HPFS switch to
superFAT imidiately since HPFS is useless with 4mb of RAM.

>A LOT. I would venture a guess that if you intends to use the Windows and
>DOS window frequently, 4 Meg is not a feasible configuration. Up it to 8,
>things might start to happen then.

4mb is suposed to work great with superFAT (assuming not too much
paralel processes of cource) 5..6mb for HPFS.

A "trick" to speed up OS/2 2.0 with relatively few memory is to NOT give
EMS and XMS to DOS/Windows. Many programs use EMS/XMS for speedup and this
is a failure if the EMS/XMS is mapped to disk (which happens if OS/2
runs out of memory).

>>        John Abanco             | john.abanco@f769.n115.z1.fidonet.org 
>Amos Yung          | Macintosh Jr.: The power to crush the other kid.


Nico E. de Vries
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
USENET: nevries@cc.ruu.nl                 FIDO      : 2:281/708.1  
VOICE : +31-3404-24931 (+31-30-316931)    FAX       : +31-30-312033 
BBS   : +31-30-341401 (Nico De_vries)     COMPUSERVE: (coming "soon")

IMPORT Disclaimer, MyPersonalOpinion;            O O  Place reserved for
Complaints about my typostyle to DEV/NUL please.  |   funny joke. Sugestions 
I work for BITECH, I don't SPEAK for BITECH.     \_/  apreciated. <== WELL ?
Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.apps:2792 bit.listserv.sas-l:1723
Organization: Queen's University at Kingston
Date: Thursday, 9 Apr 1992 12:06:05 EDT
From: Jeff Boyd <BOYDJ@QUCDN.QueensU.CA>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,bit.listserv.sas-l
Subject: Re: SAS 6.07 transport files to DBMSCOPY


A mistake in the initial posting on this topic -- there should not have
been any mention of version 5. Sorry for any confusion,


jeff

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: roy schmidt <rschmidt@copper.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: A personal perspective on choosing OS/2 2.0
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 20:40:15 -0500

   devolder@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Eric DeVolder) quotes
   ross@kaos.b23b.ingr.com:
>>John, where do you get these "statistics"???

 (and more statements from a real-world business user.)

Then Eric goes one to say:

>but most people who read these groups are familiar with mulitasking OS's such
     ^^^^^^^^^^^
>as UNIX, and despise moving back to a PC that has a single-user, single-process
>OS retarding their productivity.

I find it absolutely amazing that OS/2 evangelists are on *every* DOS
and Windows newsgroup, night and day, screaming and yelling about OS/2,
making unwarranted claims and broad sweeping statements like the above.
Ross was objecting to exactly this kind of hyperbole -- Eric, have you
surveyed *most people who read these groups* or a good, statistically
sound sample thereof to determine whether they are familiar with UNIX or
other multitasking OSs?  Do they truly "despise" their single-user PC?
I agree with Ross -- Horse Hooey!!

Do some research, Eric.  The people who are using their PCs for business
(and I don't mean the business of writing apps) might be able to relate
to you some advice on what is and is not relevant to them.

In the meantime, WHY DON'T YOU OS/2 FANS GO BACK TO
comp.os2.os2.os2.os2.gottalovit.trash.windows AND DISCUSS AMONG
YOURSELVES HOW MUCH YOU LOVE UNIX!!!

Your posts are not on the topic of this group, and a flaming big breach of
nettiquette! 
the operating system.
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roy Schmidt                 |  #include <disclaimer.h>     
Indiana University          |  /* They are _my_ thoughts, so you can't
School of Business          |     have them, so there! */

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: wanderer@athena.mit.edu (Conroy Lee)
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 (was Re: $50 for an UPGRADE!!!!!)
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 19:21:12 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.155627.9571@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu>, jliddle@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu (Jean Liddle) writes:
|> 
|> Just out of curiosity (I may upgrade to OS/2 but will _not_ upgrade to
|> windows 3.1), can Superstor, stacker, etc. be used with OS/2 - or are
|> there OS/2 versions of such disk compressors?  The idea of upgrading to
|> OS/2 is tempting, at least until I can get a machine that LINUX will run
|> on, but I'd hate to give up my disk compression!

No, I don't think they'll work under OS/2, (I know Stacker won't, I'm not that
sure about the rest though..)

There is a version of Stacker for OS/2 in development now, and supposedly beta
testing should begin this summer..

Conroy
From: cee1@ra.msstate.edu (Charles Evans)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: HOT NEWS! DOS 5.1 + STACKER....
Date: 7 Apr 92 19:35:55 GMT
Organization: Mississippi State University

Just read in a slightly coupla-week old InfoWord or was it computerworld
whatever, March 23, 1992 issue. Back page.

Microsoft has announced it will add stacker to its MS-DOS 5.1 which should
be rolling out Sept/Oct 1992.

They said, they are because that it 'runs so well with DOS 5.0'

... maybe they will also add little novelties like renaming directories..
... true moving of files
... change to any subdirectly without haveing to type a long path
... end the 640K barrier
... [seems like DOS might be doing this just to catch up with DR-DOS 6.0
     and its data compression on the fly.]
... countless other things that DOS should have.. how about a REAL
    ANSI.SYS driver

chuck

-- 
Charles E. Evans           /  o     / Whereforeseeingwealsoarecompassedabout
cee1@ra.msstate.edu       / ./|\   / withsogreatacloudofwitnesses,letuslayaside
cee1@isis.msstate.edu    /   /|'  / everyweight,andthesindothsoeasilybesetus,
cee1@msstate.bitnet     /    , ' / andletusRUNwithpatiencetheracethatissetB4us.
From: thomasg@epx.hscs.umn.edu (Thomas Gasser)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 -- Confirm or deny?
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:22:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: epx.thomasg.477
Organization: Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota

In article <Fc0RiB1w164w@tomspc.UUCP> tbaker@tomspc.UUCP (Thomas Baker) writes:

>jfe@alchemy.tn.cornell.edu (Brian Chung) writes:

>>       What big and expensive dongles?  All you need is about 4 megs of
>> RAM in total.  All Macs now come with 2 megs standard.  So all you have to do
>> is buy another ~US $100 worth of RAM.  Maybe in Germany, RAMs are expensive,
>> but not here.

>Actually, it is expensive here as well.  If you want to keep your Apple
>warranty intact, you must have an authorized apple dealer install your new
>memory.  The only one that was here wanted $80 per meg.


>--
>tbaker@tomspc.UUCP (Thomas Baker)


Adding memory yourself wil not in any way effect the warranty of the 
Macitosh.  Only if you damage the machine in the process would the warranty 
be voided.  The is atleast true of the Mac II series.  You may be correct 
about the SE and LC machines.

Thomas Gasser                                          
(612) 624-4427
Dept of Neurosurgery     
University of MN      
THOMASG@EPX.HSCS.UMN.EDU
From: bruces@mpd.tandem.com (Bruce Sawtelle)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Help - HD failed, lost "Superlok" file
Date: 11 Apr 92 21:12:45 GMT
Reply-To: bruces@mpd.tandem.com  (Bruce Sawtelle)
Distribution: na
Organization: Tandem Computers, Inc


     I recently had my hard drive fail and I was unable to recover the
     "Superlok" files for LOTUS 123 that allow it to run without the system
     disk in floppy A:. Does anyone know of a workaround or a way to recover
     this function. It's rather frustrating to have to have my only floppy
     drive dedicated to a Lotus system disk, especially when I'm changing
     back and forth from application to application. Has anyone ever
     requested replacement "Superlok" files from Lotus. (It's Lotus 2.0 
     I believe)

     Thanks

-- 
| Bruce Sawtelle           Ham Radio : W3NJ                             |
|      Tandem  Computers   Packet    : W3NJ @ N5LJF.TX.USA.NA           |
|      14231 Tandem Blvd   Internet  : bruces @ mpd.tandem.com          |
|      Austin, Tx  78728   USENET    : halley!bruces                    |
From: jliukkon@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Juha-Matti Liukkonen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: 286 memory managers: Netroom, QRAM - INFO REQ'D
Date: 12 Apr 92 20:01:58 GMT
Distribution: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Organization: University of Helsinki

I'd like some info about 286 memory managers in general and especially
about Netroom and QRAM. What chipsets they support, what features do
they have etc etc. I seem to have a chipset nothing supports, a PC Chips
(aka Hedeka) brand. Anybody know about any software supporting these (I
have mainly UMB's in mind)?

I've already been in contact with the LastByte's author, and he's
working on my BIOS image, but I'd like to know if there are any other
packages that might do domething reasonable with this chipset.

All info/pointers appreciated.

-- 
_--__----__---___---___--____/ Juha Liukkonen - jliukkon@cc.helsinki.fi \___/
_-___-____-___-_-___-___-___/ University  of Helsinki, Finland, Earth,  /o__o
_-___---__-___-_-___-___-__/ Department of Paranormal Investigations:  / (..)\
_--__-_____---___---___--_/ " 01000001 01001001  0100010  01010011 "   \  -- /
From: Hamish.Moffatt%f552.n994.z3@cloud.pub.uu.oz.au (Hamish Moffatt)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Atari ST disks <---->  IBM DOS disks ???
Date: 12 Apr 92 06:40:28 GMT

Hello Doctor!

In a message posted <Thursday April 02 1992>, Doctor Math wrote to All:

 DM> From: root@sanger.chem.nd.edu (Doctor Math)

 DM> interesting things.. The file is called FDFORMxx.ZIP, where xx was 16 for

FDFORMAT version 1.8 is the lastest. FDFORM18.ZIP.


Regards,
Hamish

=============================================================================
  Hamish Moffatt       | Cloud is a member of APANA    |    _--_|\   Cloud.
  Moffsoft Software    | The Australian Public Access  |   /      \  pub.uu
  Cloud Nine BBS       | Network Association.          |   \_.--._/  .oz.au
  Melbourne, Australia | Fidonet 3:635/552@fidonet     |         v
===================================== Standard Disclaimer Applies ===========

 * Origin: Cloud Nine, masquerading as cloud.pub.uu.oz.au. (fidonet 3:635/552)
From: exuhag@exu.ericsson.se (James Hague)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: $50 for an UPGRADE!!!!!
Date: 16 Apr 92 13:38:33 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Richardson, TX

Michael Bryan writes:
>
>Oh, but it contains so many wonderful new features!  I mean, just look at
>one of the most outstanding features of them all, which they took several
>pages to talk about in their 3.1 upgrade glossy --- "Parameter Verification"!
>
>I mean, I couldn't believe my eyes while I was reading about this wonderful
>new technology, wherein the Windows kernel will actually check the values
>passed to it, and make sure the values are reasonable before acting on them!
>What pioneering technology this is!  What foresight the engineers have for
>hitting upon what must be the programming breakthrough of the 60's, er, 90's!

I couldn't believe it when I first heard about this--I'm sure
even Microsoft's engineers are amazed that they made such a big
deal about such a trivial thing.
--
James Hague   
exuhag@exu.ericsson.se
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: jknepley@isis.cs.du.edu (Ranseus (Jim Knepley))
Subject: Re: REDUCING .EXE file size
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 16:57:39 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.161119.21765@nuscc.nus.sg> eletanjm@nuscc.nus.sg (Tan Jin Meng @ NUS) writes:
>Is there any application out there that will reduce an executable's file
>size?

There are three that I'm familiar with.

PKLITE, LZEXE, and DIET.

I use PKLITE with no trouble.  A recent magazine review (PC Mag.?) compared
the three and DIET seemed to be best.  I know that PKLITE and LZEXE are
Shareware/Public Domain, I had never heard of DIET before reading about
it.

You should be able to pick any of them up from wuarchive.wustl.edu in the
/mirrors/msdos/ area.

Good luck,
  Jim
 
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: burton@asdsun.larc.nasa.gov (John Burton)
Subject: Re: $50 for an UPGRADE!!!!!
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA  USA
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 12:17:42 GMT

In article <92104.232242KECKME@PURCCVM.BITNET> KECKME@PURCCVM.BITNET (Michael Keck) writes:
>What really, really bugs me about Microsoft is they are charging $50 for
>a patch.   Going from 3.0 to 3.1 is not a $50 improvement!!  Going from
>3.0 to 4.0 is a $50 improvement!!  A .1 version upgrade is a $10 PATCH.
>
>How many times is Microsoft going to shoot themselves in the foot until
>they realize, "Oh my, what have we done now?!?!"
>
>Maybe all the "Blood loss" has clouded their thinking.
>
>|-------------------------------------|------------------------------|
>| MICHAEL KECK                        | "What we have here is a      |
>| DPMA - PURDUE UNIVERSITY            |   failure to communicate"    |
>| BITNET:   keckme@purccvm.bitnet     |         - COOL HAND LUKE     |
>| INTERNET: keckme@vm.cc.purdue.edu   |                              |
>|-------------------------------------|------------------------------|

Well, you *could* always say F*&^ Microsoft and pay $49 for an upgrade
to a GUI that doesn't have that 640KB limit lurking at the bottom of
it and somewhat hidden by the memory manager...:-) Just remember...
IBM has been offering FREE upgrades from its OS/2 v 1.x to OS/2 2.0
and you get an ENTIRE operating system thrown in! Not saying you
should switch, just saying OS/2 looks like a *good* alternative to
the Microsoft rut...(not to mention that it can run and pre-emptively
multitask DOS, Windows and OS/2 programs at the same time...)

John
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| John Burton                                                        |
| G & A Technical Software                                           |
| jcburt@gatsibm.larc.nasa.gov                                       |
| burton@asdsun.larc.nasa.gov                                        |
| jcburt@cs.wm.edu                                                   |
|                                                                    |
| Disclaimer: Hey, what can I say...These are *my* views, not those  |
|             of anyone else, be they employer, school, or government|
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: ujabanco@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (John Abanco)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: OS/2 - How much memory are you guys using?
Date: 15 Apr 92 04:27:07 GMT
Organization: Educational Computing Network

Just wondering how much memory you guys out there have on your machine.
Most of my friends either have 2 or 4 Megs of memory. One has 8 and has
OS/2 installed on his machine.

I've got 4 Megs. I installed my free copy (from COMDEX) on my machine
once, and found disk access HORENDOUS. Someone told me that you need 6
Megs to do okay, and 8 Megs to run it good. 

So my question is to those people out there running OS/2 v2.0 right now.
How much memory do *you* have on your machine, and how often does it do
disk access after you get the OS/2 Workplace Shell (WPS)?

If you are running on 4 Megs of memory, are you satisfied with the
performance? How many DOS sessions have you been able to run
concurrently? My friend said that you need 8 Megs to run Virtual Memory
mode. Thanks for your responses. E-mail appreciated and if there are
enough responses, I'll post a followup.


-- 
--My life is such a mess,I end  | INTERNET: ujabanco@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
  up typing.... umop apisdn.    | FIDONET :
        John Abanco             | john.abanco@f769.n115.z1.fidonet.org 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rpi.its,comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.windows.ms.apps
From: caughd@aix.rpi.edu (Daniel Sean Caugherty)
Subject:   VT3x0 emulation for the PC/DOS/Windows world?
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 04:18:06 GMT

To Whom It May Concern --

First of all, my apologies for the cross-posting; although this is a
netiquette faux pas, I wasn't sure where to post.

I was wondering if there were any VT3x0 emulation packages out there
for the IBM-PC/MS-DOS/Windows environments.  If any one out there
would happen to know, could you please send me a response via direct
e-mail?

(As it happens, a simple VT100 emulation won't do the trick here --
I'm asking for a friend who's using the McDonnell Douglas Unigraphics
Bulletin Board, and the graphics that the later DEC terminals
supported would come in handy.  Again, if you know where to look,
acknowledgement would be greatly appreciated.)

-- Dan Caugherty (caugherd@cs.rpi.edu)
   C.S. Dept.,  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 
   "Read my lips; no new term." -- You know who, paraphrased...
Newsgroups: 
Subject: 
Summary: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Keywords: 

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps

Try REDPAGES...

This is a Visual Basic application written by I & A Associates out of Canada.

I recently sent in my registration dollars, but have not heard back from them
yet.

This is a nice package.  It allows custom printing definition, and custom 
screen formats - At least you can change the screen font...

It includes spaces for 4 phone numbers, and catagorization of entries.  The
Categories allow you to select displays on Companies, personal friends, 
Significant Other's friends.  Dial-out capabilities are to come with 
registration.

Full DLL support is available too..

CompuServe owner is 70724,2401

I recently installed 3.1 and it works fine under this, even though it was
designed under 3.0.

This is only the second Shareware application that I have felt was worth
registering.

Just my $.02 ...

|Craig Gilmore                  ===============================================
|Hewlett-Packard Response Center   |  "I know GOD is a man, 'cause the first  |
|craigg@hpwrce.HP.COM - Preferred  |  thing created was DIRT.  A woman would  |
|craigg@hpwrc03.HP.COM             |  have created a DUSTBUSTER..." -Gallager |
|These are MY opinions, HP only pays me to answer questions and solve problems|
===============================================================================
Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.apps:2861 comp.os.msdos.misc:3186 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:7497
From: yee@mipgsun.mipg.upenn.edu (Conway Yee)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Address of PKWARE, Inc.??
Date: 14 Apr 92 00:57:02 GMT
Followup-To: comp.os.msdos.apps
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

joel@upchrch.UUCP (Joel Upchurch  ) writes:
>
>My new copy of PC Magazine has an Ad for PKZIP 2.0 on page 100. The address
>given is:

[address deleted]

>PKZIP 2.0 is $47.00 + $3.50 S&H

I take it then, that, PKZIP has gone commercial.  True or false?

-- 
Blockley Hall, 4th floor|                    Conway Yee, N2JWQ
418 Service Drive       |yee@ming.mipg.upenn.edu    (preferred)
Philadelphia, PA 19104  |cy5@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (forwarded to above)
(215) 662-6780          |yee@bnlx26.nsls.bnl.gov    (rarely checked)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.misc
From: jay@astro.as.utexas.edu (Jay Boisseau)
Subject: Graphics packages cmpatible wth DJGPP
Keywords: DJGPP, graphics
Organization: Univ. of Texas McDonald Observatory
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 15:05:36 GMT

I have been informed by one read (thanks!) that I can't just plug VOGLE
graphics routines calls into a code and compile it under DJGPP--a graphics
driver for DJGPP needs to be written, and the libraries need to be
recompiled under DJGPP. Since I have no idea how to write a graphics
driver (I have been using a Mac for years, but a pc for only a few months),
I would like to know if anybody knows of ANY graphics package that works
with DJGPP.

I heard about DJGPP first here on the net, so I'm hoping some of you
DJGPP fans have used a prahics package with your codes before. I don't
need anything _too_ fancy, just a set of basic routines I can call from
within my code to draw lines between points, and other simple stuff.

Please email, and I will post a summary.

Thanks,
Jay Boisseau
Astronomy Dept.
University of Texas at Austin
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.atari.st.tech