HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dsmith@dcs.simpact.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: LaserJet 4: How much memory do I need?!
Date: 15 Dec 92 15:21:13 PDT
Organization: Simpact Associates, San Diego CA

In article <1ggr8kINNt6r@hsc.usc.edu>, ghenzie@hsc.usc.edu (Gregory M. Henzie) writes:
> 
> I recently purchased the much raved about LaserJet 4.  I got it
> with 6 megs of RAM which I was led to believe would be enough for
> full page graphics at 600 DPI.  This isn't the case.  Mixing text
> and graphics is no problem, but if I go to print a full page high-
> resolution graphics image, I get a memory overflow error.  Anyone
> know just how much memory I need to add to get rid of this message
> permanently?  (The minimum amount necessary!)
>  

This isn't too diffucult of a problem if you understand math.  A sheet
of paper is 8.5"x 11".   The laserjet 4 does 600 dots per inch (DPI).

    8.5 * 11 * 600 * 600 = 33.66 M bits / 8 bits per byte = 4.2075 MB

Did you get the error message from DOS or some application trying to 
generate the image OR was the error message from the printer?

Dave Smith
From: swm@uts.amdahl.com (Steven W. McCann)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: 386/486 Motherboards sought
Keywords: motherboard
Date: 18 Dec 92 01:24:10 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

After suffering for years with a slow system (AT clone at 8 Mhz) I have
decided to give myself a Christmas present of a new motherboard.  
Being basically frugal (read cheap), I want the most bang for my bucks.

I have seen advertised some motherboards (ie: Deico Predator) that will
take both 386 and 486 processors at various speeds.  The claim is that
you just set some jumpers to tell it what CPU chip is there, and you are 
off and running.  You just put in the cpu chip and set the jumpers and 
you are off and running.  When you want to upgrade, you replace the chip and 
reset the jumpers.  No new clock crystal, no BIOS upgrade, just a new chip.

This would allow me to put in a 386 chip now, and upgrade later to a 486
when and if the prices drop.  Sounds like the best of all possible worlds
to me.  

The only ones I have been able to find are the Deico board, and a Taiwan
built board sold by Altman Computer.  Deico got a mixed review here in 
this group recently, and the folks at Altman aren't very forthcoming 
with information (they just tell me that it is a Taiwan built board, no
manufacturer or anything else).  

Anybody out there have any experience with these things.  I would appreciate
any comments, sources, and price information I can get.  
-- 
Regards,
Steve
__
Steven W. McCann       |  (408-992-2764) Voice  |  swm@uts.amdahl.com
Amdahl Corporation     |  (408-746-7095) Fax    | 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us (gordon hlavenka)
Subject: Re: Value of IBM PC 8088????
Organization: Vpnet Public Access
Distribution: comp
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 00:50:12 GMT

 pl3x@vax5.cit.cornell.edu writes:
>IBM PC 8088, 256k working on mother board
>2 360K drives
>printer port
>memory card/ comm port card
>IBM green screen monitor
>DOS 3.3, IBM operating manuals
>
>What's a reasonable price to sell this system

Tucker is selling IBM PCs with mono, 360K floppy, 10MB hard drive,
640K RAM for $279 -- monitor and keyboard included.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Gordon S. Hlavenka           cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us
Vote straight ticket Procrastination party Dec. 3rd!
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: chan@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Vi Chi Chan)
Subject: Help with Maxtor Hard Drive!!   
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Distribution: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 18:52:53 GMT

Hello there,

	Last week I was playing around with my Maxtor 7120A hard
	drive's jumper setting, trying to add another IDE drive (
	a Seagate ST-157A ) to my pc. But the pc just crashed all a
	sudden. When I restored the previous setting, The hard drive
	setting in the CMOS BIO was gone! I tried to look up some refer
	ence to get the setting (since I don't have the manual) But I
	can't get anything for Lzone and WPcom. And worse, The hard 
	drive can't boot! 

	Is there anyone out there could help me with the settings?
	If it's not the problem of the settings, what else went wrong?
	I can still use my hard drive, but it just can't boot, and when
	I ran Norton Disk Doctor, it reported many bad sector.

	Please help!
	THanks in advance.

	Merry Christmas.

Billy Chan
chan@en.ecn.purdue.edu
billy@symphony.cc.purdue.edu
From: jsicolo@mipos2.intel.com (James Sicolo)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: ATI Ultra Pro RAMDAC chip
Date: 13 Dec 92 22:02:53 GMT
Organization: Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA


	How can I get some details about this chip?
	What resolution/color does it provide? 
	How much is it?
	Is it worth the price?


			
			Thanks alot
			James Sicolo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
James Sicolo			"They dared to go where no one would try...
jsicolo@mipos2.intel.com 	 They chose to fly where eagles dare" 
(408)-765-5530
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Subject: Re: EISA vs. ISA -VESA Local Bus MotherboardsDIR
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 23:48:55 GMT

In <1992Dec11.181215.315@csghsg5a.bitnet> lmebold@csghsg5a.bitnet writes:

>In article <TOMW.92Dec10205510@orac.asd.sgi.com>, tomw@orac.asd.sgi.com (Tom Weinstein) writes:
>> In article <1992Dec10.232429.13724@rti.rti.org>, rac@rti.rti.org writes:
>> 
>>> I need some help deciding whether to buy a 486DX EISA motherboard,
>>> or a ISA-VESA Local Bus motherboard.
>> 
>>> It is my understanding that the EISA bus is a 32-bit wide bus,
>>> and can therefore process more/larger information chunks than a
>>> 16-bit wide ISA bus. Although the ISA bus is running at (usually)
>>> 8MHz, I've not heard what speed the EISA bus is normally.
>> 
>> EISA runs at 8.33 MHz.  Comparing this directly to ISA's 8 MHz (even
>> taking into account the 32-bit/16-bit difference) can be misleading,
>> however.  EISA's maximum transfer rate is 33 MB/s.  ISA's maximum is
>> 8 MB/s, but in most systems, and for most cards, it can only get
>> 5.33 MB/s.


>When you say you can only get 5.33 MB/s with EISA, look what you get with
>ISA in real life! EISA just IS faster than ISA.

Uh, that's not what he said.  See above.

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
From: matthias@nsr.hp.com (Matthias Kamm)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Will Windows crawl on my system?
Date: 17 Dec 1992 22:08:58 GMT
Organization: Hewlett Packard Santa Clara Site
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: hpmvd069.nsr.hp.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.2 PL7]

Chris D. Jennings (cdj@iti.org) wrote:
: 
: Please excuse me if this is a FAQ - I'm new to this group.
: 
: I'm considering Windows 3.1 so that my home machine will be more
: compatible with the machine my wife uses at her office. 
:

Go for it.  What a machine lacks in raw processing power you can 
make up with RAM and permanent swap space.

4Mbs of RAM is a minumum, 8 would be better.  That way you can set
up a large hard disk cache, and a RAM disk for your /TEMP directory.
Since you'll probably be running in 386 enhanced mode, you can speed
things up with a permanent swap file on your hard disk.  If you
don't need the virtual memory options in enhanced mode, run in
standard mode; it's faster.  

Believe it or not, I was perfectly happy running Excel and WinWord
with Windows 3.0 on my old 286 machine with lots of RAM.  The main
time killer was switching back and forth between DOS and windows
(286 "brain dead" processor feature).  You'll have no such problems.
Have fun :-)

MK
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 11:01:30 EST
From: <DXR8@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Rediculously slow floppy drives after 286->486 upgrade. Help?
Distribution: na

In article <widow.724576075@camelot>, widow@camelot.bradley.edu (Shaun Burnett)
says:
>
>        I upgraded my system from a 286/12.5 to a 486/33.  I took
>        the two drives that came with my 286 (1.44M and 1.2M), and put
>        them in the 486.
>
>        Now I know that floppy drive access under DR-DOS 6.0 is slow,
>        but now it is painfully slow.  In fact, it seems slower than
>        when I had the 286.
>
>        Anyone have any suggestions or insight?  I don't have the slow
>        drive access problem under OS/2 2.0.
>
>
>Shaun Burnett               |   "You can't survive on a new planet with a
>widow@camelot.bradley.edu   |   soul full of hope and fresh air you know."
>OS/2--Happy Happy Joy Joy--OS/2         -  Dr. Who (Tom Baker)

Did you try increasing your DOS BUFFER statement, on my 386 there is a
big difference on the floppy/HD when increasing the buffers from 10 to 50.

Brian

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Subject: Re: SCSI Interface:terminator and ID information required
Keywords: SCSI
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:51:44 GMT

In <1gi91qINN5k8@frigate.doc.ic.ac.uk> kd@doc.ic.ac.uk (Kostis Dryllerakis) writes:


>Dear all,

>	I suppose that my ignorance on SCSI systems is deep but I need the following
>information quite fast:

>	My controller requires that there are terminator resistors at both ends of
>	the SCSI bus. The one end is supplied by the board itself (Adaptec 1542B)
>	the other must be provided by a SCSI device. Currently I have connected
>	my hard disk at ID 1 with the resistors powered. Now I want to add a tape
>	drive on the SCSI interface. Where do the terminators go? To the last SCSI
>	target? To the last physical device on the cable? 

Correct.  The terminators are to prevent electrical 'echos' from
futzing up the bus.  It IS sometimes possible to run without them
(I've run my AHA-1740 unterminated on one end for a while).

>       Do targets have to be
>	connected on the SCSI bus according to their ID (i.e. 1 first then 2 etc...).
>	I would prefer not to change the configuration of the HD at ID1 and just add
>	the tape drive with the resistors powered off. Could that be done? (e.g. by
>	connecting the tape first onthe SCSI cable and the disk next?)

I would think this ought to work.  I can't imagine how the controller
could tell who is plugged in where.  A bus is a bus, right?  As long
as it's all in a line and terminated on both ends, I don't see why you
shouldn't be able to hang them in any order you want.

HOWEVER, theory and practice sometimes don't go well together.  It
seems that there are SOME devices that will interfere with devices
further down the chain from them.  This doesn't have anything to do
with ID's, but rather with how each device acts on the bus.  Given
that, you may find yourself having to rearrange devices on the chain
anyway. 

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
From: tibbs@math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Diamond's new motherboard?
Date: 12 Dec 92 01:50:19
Organization: Blob Shop Programmers
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: karazm.math.uh.edu

In this month's Computer Shopper, Cornell Computers is advertising (page
108) systems based on the new Diamond VESA local bus ISA motherboard.  They
don't quote specs on the board except to mention Flash BIOS and 128 MB of
total ram.  Does anyone have any more information on the board?  I'm
assuming that it's not available yet.

BTW, the advertised packages are really attractive, costing by my estimate
over $500 less that a comparable Gateway system.
--
 Jason L. Tibbitts III - tibbs@math.uh.edu - 713/743-3466 - 685PGH
System Administrator:  University of Houston Mathematics Department
 Houston Centers for Advanced Scientific and Molecular Computation
Blob Shop Programmers: Database consulting and graphics programming
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: jliukkon@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Juha-Matti Liukkonen)
Subject: Re: Hacking Nintendo?
Organization: University of Helsinki
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 20:01:34 GMT

cjp@mvaxcs1.cse.nau.edu (Christopher Pearson) writes:

>I'm not sure if this is the right group to discuss this in but....

>Is there any way to Hack a Nintendo/Super Nintendo/ect game
>cartriges using a PC???

...Or would it be possible to build a PC add-on card that eats Nintendo
game modules, and software to emulate a Nintendo..? I know my kid
brother would love such an emulator.

Of course, there would be copyright problems, but one can always wish
for things...

Later,
-- 
               Juha Liukkonen, aka jliukkon@cc.helsinki.fi
              University of Helsinki,  Dept. of  Lost Souls
           "Trust me, I know what I'm doing." - Sledge Hammer
From: reza@magellan.ae.utexas.edu (Alireza Vali)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Viewsonic 6FS vs. NEC 3FGx
Date: 20 Dec 92 18:43:22 GMT
Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware

Hello out there.  I've grown sick & tired of my interlaced, flickering
monitor.  The 17" monitors are definitely out of my price range, and 
another 14" monitor is out of the question.  Given that, I've been
looking at various 15" monitors and have narrowed down my choices to
the Viewsonic 6FS and the NEC 3FGx.  The two are identically priced
and the specs are somewhat similar so it's time to move from objective
to subjective comparisons.  Does anyone have first hand experience 
using either or both of these monitors?  If so, I would appreciate any
feedback on the subject.  Please respond by e-mail because I will miss
all the followups because of the upcoming holidays.  Thanks in advance.


-- 
Ali R. Vali - reza@magellan.ae.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: malinen@krk.fi (Mikko Malinen)
Subject: Mountain Filesafe 1200 SCSI adapter?
Organization: Radio Club of Kauniainen (OH2NRG)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 17:58:09 GMT

Hi fellow netters!

I would like to know is it possible to connect Mountain FileSafe 1200 to an
SCSI 1 controller..or must i buy a SCSI II controller for that tapedrive and
which SCSI cards will work with this tapedrive. My hardware follows:
486/33 mhz ISA PC
8 mb memory
BOCA XVGA SVGA card
Soundblaster Pro
OS/2 2.0.1 and DOS 5.0

I also would like to know what problems i may encounter when i'm installing this
device.

-- 
About to send a 3.14159Tb/s 3-beam interstellar overspace link to Vega, Lyrae.
This link is supposed to enhance the current availability of my intergalactic
mailserver at malinen@krksun.krk.fi
 
We're also interested in receiving Vega.Bullshit area, but we're quite short
of SpaceLink (tm) capable software.
From: seah@ee.rochester.edu (David Seah)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: ATI Graphics Ultra Pro & VESA Problem?
Date: 15 Dec 92 16:00:43 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Univ of Rochester, College of Engineering and Applied Science

Are there any problems with ATI's VESA driver?  My VVESA.COM is dated
March 19, 1992, and it doesn't seem to center modes properly even after
fiddling extensively with the Custom Monitor installation.  The biggest
problems exist in 640x480x256 and 1024x768x256 color mode.  In Windows,
everything is fine and centered.  However, in DOS mode, the 640x480
is too tall and not wide enough (killing square pixel=ness). 
In 1024x768 mode, the display is severely overscanned and shifted to
the left in DOS applications, yet in Windows everything is perfect-o.

Any clues?  Anyone have a more recent version of VVESA.COM?

-- 
Dave Seah ^..^   | Graduate MSEE, University of Rochester, New York           |
                 | Apple II Graphics & Sound Forum Consultant, America Online |

[Internet] seah@ee.rochester.edu, AFCDaveS@aol.com   [America Online] AFC DaveS
Organization: Sophomore, Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.intel
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:55:04 -0500 
From: Faisal Nameer Jawdat <fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: RISC defined! Was Re: 486SLC chip.... what is it?
	<1992Dec16.025659.16572@eng.umd.edu>

russotto@eng.umd.edu (Matthew T. Russotto) writes:
> In article <Uf_tvJW00WB7Q8SnFj@andrew.cmu.edu> fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu
> (Faisal Nameer Jawdat) writes:
> >Through the wonders of unix, wherein the same code was for the most
> >part still usable, with substantial speed improvement.
>
> Same SOURCE.  You can't run Sun 3 binaries on a Sparc, though.

Obviously not, but same source code.  And for that matter, very few
people with unix machines don't a) know how to recompile things, or b)
have someone around to recompile things for them.



-- faisal jawdat                  | "Certainly the game is rigged.
email: fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu       | Don't let that stop you;
if mail handler barfs             | if you don't bet, you can't win." 
fj05@andrew.cmu.edu               |        -Lazarus Long
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:32877 comp.sys.mac.hardware:23860
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: SCSI HD for MAC & PC
Date: 11 Dec 92 21:47:33 GMT
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc

In <Af9sAWu00aw_Mw=7UI@andrew.cmu.edu> Faisal Nameer Jawdat <fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

><AGCKK@ASUACAD.BITNET> writes:
>> Does MAC use the same type of SCSI HD as PC use ?

>Not sure, but I would say that it depends on the type of scsi
>controller the pc in question has. 

From what I understand, the Mac generally expects a little more
intelligence from its drives than PC's require (their controller isn't
quite standard, apparently).  What that means is that you can move Mac
drives to a PC (given a decent controller), but you can't reliably
move PC drives to a Mac.  You would obviously, of course, have to
reformat the drive with the new controller.

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
From: lmebold@csghsg5a.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Are Cache-controllers rubbish?
Date: 15 Dec 92 15:56:38 GMT
Organization: University of St.Gallen, Switzerland

Hi

I heard that cache-controllers may have problems with
new operating systems (e.g. OS/2: it can even be slower
with a cache on the controller). I'm on the way to buy
an EISA-SCSI-II-hostadaptor and want to run it with WindowsNT
once it's there. So I wonder whether there will be problems
when having a cache-controller and running WindowsNT.
Actually I'd like to buy the AMI-caching-controller - but
i'm still not sure whether there could arise troubles.
Any information would highly be appreciated.

Or does someone know an EISA-SCSI-II-hostadaptor without
cache but with a good throughput together with a softwarecache?


Thanks a lot

   -Luke


It seems to be very difficult to find answers on this question.
I still hope someone can help me.

Organization: Sophomore, Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 09:45:35 -0500 
From: Faisal Nameer Jawdat <fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: "Windoze" slow? Naah...Re: pc and mac: was RE: 486 and mac benchmarks
	<1992Dec16.220010.20828@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>

jess@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Jess M Holle) writes:
> The single button is an advantage!

So is automatic transmission.

[someone else said...]
> >    If the mac is suppose to be truly a multitasking system, then why do
> >you have to load multifinder on top of the mac os?

Gee, why does dos not let you use more than 32 megs on a partition...
:-)

> enormous.  In order to obtain a GUI, owners of these machines have 3
> choices: buy Windows (very cheap and you get a $%&! pathetic GUI), buy
> OS/2 (you pay a little more, give up more hard drive space, but get an
> operating system), or sell the PC and buy a Mac (most expensive, but the
> best GUI is obtained).  Most PC owners, thinking of only the sales lines

opinions, opinions
a lot of people think os/2 has a better gui than the mac
people have also said that while its initial learning curve (first day
or so) is more difficult than the macs, it is much more intuitive and
easy to use afterwards, not to mention more usefull and flexible
Of course, windows just sucks...

> Motorola had a few problems getting the 040 up to higher clock speeds,
> etc.  Big deal.  At least when it came out it wasn't full of bugs as the
> first 486's were, as I recall.

Big deal?  Well that's like saying the 68000 doesn't compare to the
486, and it's not a big deal because it wasn't as buggy as the 486
when the 486 came out.  The migration from the 386 to the 486 was a
*lot* easier and smoother than the migration from the '030 based macs
to the Quadra's.

What counts now is today, when Intel is making 486's that blow the
doors off of '040's, because they can clock double, and are pushing
the pace, whereas Motorola seems to be twiddling their thumbs.  When
is that 40mhz '040 coming out?  How long overdue are we here?  Intel
is coming out with the 486dx2/80.  mhz for mhz, an '040 will beat a
486, but Intel can push the 486 higher and higher, while Motorola
may never be able to  clock double the '040, regardless of whether
they want to or not.  (This is has to do with the '040's internal
architecture, and has nothing to do with Motorola's chip designing
prowess, assuming they ever get off their buts and finish doing
something with the 680x0 line - Should I upgrade the 2ci to the
PowerPC or should I wait for a Radius Rocket/060)

> B.T.W.  You can buy a decent Mac (IIsi) from CompUSA for $1400, I believe
>         it was.  I saw the ad on TV a couple of weeks ago.

A monitor would be nice.  So would a keyboard.  Don't count on a
decent configuration for less than $2200.  (2si 5/80, 14" monitor,
keyboard)


-- faisal jawdat                  | "Certainly the game is rigged.
email: fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu       | Don't let that stop you;
if mail handler barfs             | if you don't bet, you can't win." 
fj05@andrew.cmu.edu               |        -Lazarus Long
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: mmetzger@athena.mit.edu (Michael J Metzger)
Subject: Re: COMMENTS ON CORNELL COMPUTER SOLICITED
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 22:39:45 GMT

In article <y3R=Z7B@engin.umich.edu> chyang@grad.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang) writes:
>
>	
>	Hi:
>
>	I recently saw an ad on CORNELL COMPUTER.  They offer a 
>486/DX266 system with 17" monitor for about  $3200-3500.  It seems
>very attractive.  My question is does any one have experiences with 
>CORNELL COMPUTER?  Please comment.
>
>- Chung Yang

	I bought an AMD 386-40 from CORNELL COMPUTERS earlier this fall. I had no problems getting information from them over the phone and found their staff to be quite helpful. The system shipped on time, and matched the system I ordered in every respect. They also did not bill my credit card until after I received the system. As for the computer itself, I'm quite happy with it. The position the various cards are in initially makes it difficult to access one or two of the slots, but this is common in clone comp

uters. All in all I'm quite pleased, and would not hesitate to order from them again. 
	I have no association with CORNELL COMPUTERS other than being a satisfied customer. Good luck with your purchase.
						Michael Metzger
						mmetzger@Athena.mit.edu

Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:33271 comp.sys.mac.hardware:24200