HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tiok_jk@tac.fi (Juha Koivisto)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: SAUNA CUP: 9/2  Finland-TCH
Date: 4 Sep 92 17:47:36 +0300
Organization: City of Tampere

Turku, Finland, Wednesday 9/2/92

SAUNA CUP / Match n:o 6

Finland - Czechoslovakia  2-7   (0-1, 1-6, 1-0)

1. period:
  1.23  2 min  Roman Rysanek C
  5.36  2 min  Mika Alatalo F 
  6.42  2 min  Jali Wahlsten F 
  7.37   0-1   Jiri Kucera (Jiri Jonak)  (pp)
  8.48  2 min  Richard Adam C 
2. period:
 20.38   0-2   Otakar Janecky (Jiri Dolezal - Kucera) 
 21.22  2 min  Mika Nieminen F 
 22.05   0-3   Peter Zubek (Pavol Zubek)  (pp)
 22.14   0-4   Tomas Kucharcik (Ivo Prorok - Jan Alinc) 
 22.53   0-5   Alinc (Prorok) 
 24.07   0-6   Roman Rysanek (Jiri Dopita) 
 30.14  2 min  Janne Laukkanen F 
 30.17   0-7   Drahomir Kadlec (Kucharcik)  (pp)
 33.07   1-7   Mikko Makela (Keijo Sailynoja - Waltteri Immonen) 
 33.41  2 min  Laukkanen F 
3. period:
 41.02  2 min  Jonak C 
 55.40  2 min  Pavol Zubek C 
 57.49   2-7   Juha Riihijarvi (Harri Laurila) 

Penalties: Finland 5 x 2 min, Czechoslovakia 4 x 2 min
Saves:     Juha Virenius F 11+9+7=27, Petr Briza C 8+9+11=28
Referees:  Gerhard Muller (Timo Heinonen - Reijo Ringbom)


SAUNA CUP 1992 Final Standings

Team            G  W T L GF-GA P
--------------------------------
Russia          3  3 0 0 16-4  6
Czechoslovakia  3  2 0 1 15-6  4
USA             3  0 1 2  5-14 1
Finland         3  0 1 2  4-16 1
================================

-- 
Juha Koivisto   *  Department of Information Technology
tiok_jk@tac.fi  *  City of Tampere, Finland
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy)
Subject: Re: Whalers trade Holik for Burke & Weinrich
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 10:00:51 GMT

In article <4905@balrog.ctron.com> mattb@olympus.ctron.com (Matt Brown) writes:
>Didn't see it mentioned yet.  Sean Burke is no relation to Brian Burke, to
>my knowledge. Interesting to me as a PC grad that Brian's first deal was
>with his old coach Lou L. I remarked before that I thought Sean was a head
>case. Maybe that's too strong, but he obviously had problems after his first
>stellar year.  Maybe it went to his head, but he hasn't been the same since.
>Don't know what Lou expects to do with Holik, but it looks like Brian improved
>the Whaler's backline some with this deal.  Weinrich is pretty solid.
>
>I think it is kind of too bad for Pieterangelo, but maybe they'll split the
>games now that 'Dorky Wits went in the expansion draft.
>

Rumor in the papers up here suggests that Pittsburgh has the rights to
claim Pietrangelo back... 

Holik has potential...but because Hartford got Weinrich too, I think
this swings the deal in their favor.

Gerald
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare)
Subject: Re: Contract details-Bourque/Rangers 
Reply-To: gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare)
Organization: Curious Goods (formerly Louis Vendredi Antiques)
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 16:17:35 GMT

golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:
>
>The Rangers are desparate for a Stanley Cup, but throwing that
>kind of money around for role players is just irresponsible.

Since Phil Bourque started out as a defenceman, he may see a Phil
Housley-type (or rather, Oiler-time Jari Kurri) role by playing the
point on power-plays or filling in for injuries to Leetch.  Having
Bourque's versatility could also put James Patrick's future as a
blue-shirt in greater doubt making the possibilities of some kind
of deal for Steve Yzerman (or three-way with Quebec sending Bryan
Hextall to the Red Wings) even more likely now than ever before.
Bourque's skating abilities and his ability to make clutch plays
were one of the many things that killed the Rangers last year, so
they have a pretty good idea of what they're getting.

gld
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Je me souviens ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gary L. Dare				Elections 1992-93:
> gld@cunixB.cc.columbia.EDU		* Jean Chretien (Canada)
> gld@cunixc.BITNET			* Perot^H^H^H^H^H Elvis! (USA)
From: John_Carson@mindlink.bc.ca (John Carson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: LIGHTNING NEWS: Local TV Schedule
Date: 30 Aug 92 15:48:08 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: world

So I would be interested in the PRO-SET CARDS. What is involved other than the
e-mail letter. Have a nice day>

John
--
***********************************************************************
* D.John Carson    J & H Concepts   (604)589-5118                     *
*                                   Surrey, BC                        *
*                                   John_Carson@mindlink.bc.ca        *
***********************************************************************
From: nittmo@camelot.bradley.edu (Christopher Taylor)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: ESPN Followup
Date: 3 Sep 92 17:33:12 GMT
Article-I.D.: camelot.nittmo.715541592
Distribution: na
Organization: Bradley University

>>>--25 regular season games (mostly on Fridays)
>>>--up to 37 playoff games
>>>--Full Stanley Cup Finals
>>>--$80 million over 5 years (comprable to $50/3 year with Sports Channel
>>>   parts of America)
>>>--Provisions for future network TV coverage
>>>--First game will be Oct. 6 (Tue.) - Phila. vs. Pitt. (Lindros vs. Lemieux)
>>>
>>>Enjoy

>>I'm not sure that this is a great deal for hockey fans that already get
>>good coverage. It might be good for places like Tampa or SanJose that
>>don't have decent coverage. Last year I had great viewing options.
>>SportsChannel NY gave me NYI, NJ and MSG gave me the Rangers. We also
>>get HNIC. SOme occasional late games from from SC Chicago and their
>>wonderful anchor at his wonderful set. A choice of over 10 games a week
>>and almost every night! wife? child? thesis? my job....? huh? what?
>>But I only play two nights a week.

>HEY!  I live in the network area of SC Small Time - er, Chicago, and I
>have to put up with 'their wonderful anchor at his wonderful set,' and
>I don't like it.  You've seen all the posts that come out from time to
>time about how horrendous SC is.  I would love to have access to HNIC!
>(I'm from Winnipeg)  In upstate NY the situation is different, but
>here in Illinois I am glad that there this deal went through, as we
>can now be assured of some good coverage, which won't be blacked-out or
>tape delayed for Bulls games that are also being shown on another
>channel or for pre-season baseball (don't laugh; it's happened).  

I have to second this motion about SC Chicago.  They may have a 'wonderful
set' but I sure don't think any of their anchor or announcers are 
'wonderful'.  And the only hockey they seem to show on there is the 
Blackhawks, and that is only when there isn't a Bulls game or White Sox
game going on at the same time.  It gets to be real fun during the
playoffs--two years ago during the finals all but 2 of the 6 games were
tape delayed because of White Sox games (and these games usually lasted
past 10:30 Central time after they had their stupid post game report and
all that stuff).  Yeah, that's real great coverage there.
With the ESPN deal, those of us who have to suffer through SC Chicago
(which also refused to show the Stanley Cup finals from Chicago so those
could be on HawkVision for $20 a pop) will finally be able to see some
different teams and won't have to worry about games being tape delayed
90% of the time.  I'm very happy to see this deal--I only wish it had
been in place the last two years so I could have seen every game of the
finals live instead of just 2 of 6 live in 1991 and only 2 of 4 even 
available on 'free' TV this year.  It is going to be much easier to follow
the entire NHL (instead of just the Norris Division--according to SC
Chicago, nothing else seems to exist) here now.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: drake@dragon.cpe.ulowell.edu (Frank Drake)
Subject: When Harry met Dmitri... (was: BOSTON NEWS: David Shaw)
Organization: University of Massachusetts Lowell
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 22:56:34 GMT


>Also, how are the contract negotiations with Dmitri K? Did he accept Sinden's
>"final offer"?

The offer was SUPPOSEDLY withdrawn after last Thursday or Friday. But this
is just Harry negotiating. Remember Joe Juneau trying to play hardball?
Said he was going to Switzerland if Harry wouldn't give him a one way deal?
Harry told him to practice his yodeling.

Of course, Juneau was signed and (I beleive) he got his one way deal.
I never saw much more than a sidenote about this, after he was signed,
so, if anybody knows for sure, I'd like to hear about Joey's contract.

Frank
--
Frank Drake                 "Jesus saves - and Esposito scores on the rebound!"
University of Massachusetts Lowell
Center for Productivity Enhancement                               (508)934-2630
Lowell, Massachusetts 01854                        drake@dragon.cpe.ulowell.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: gp2f+@andrew.cmu.edu (Gary James Patalsky)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Phil Bourque signs w Rangers
Date: 1 Sep 92 00:09:54 GMT
Organization: Freshman, CIT general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Pittsburgh free agent left center signed a contract with the New York
Rangers.  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: rolo@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (roger.lowsky)
Subject: Re: Contract details-Bourque/Rangers 
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 16:14:18 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.152558.5226@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:
>In article <BtwL96.JCn.1@cs.cmu.edu> lli+@cs.cmu.edu (Lori Iannamico) writes:
>>As we all know by now, Phil Bourque has signed with the Rangers.  He signed a
>>multi-year contract believed to be worth more than 1 million per year.  Since
>>Phil is a free agent w/o compensation, the Rangers owe the Pens nothing. 
>>(The contract info was heard on WDUQ-Radio).
>>
>>It seems Howard Baldwin's words have rang true.  He said that while he really
>>wanted to sign guys like Phil (and Joe Mullen), he was not about to pay a
>>million dollars for them.   I have to agree with him on this.  As much as
>>I like Bourqie, I don't think he's worth a million a year.
>>
>
>Does the NHL needs revenue-sharing and a salary cap or what?
>
>The Rangers are desparate for a Stanley Cup, but throwing that
>kind of money around for role players is just irresponsible.

Well, I think this is a case of bad information.
A NY paper reported Phil's contract with the Rangers to be
$1.8M for 4 years.  That's only $450K a season, but alot more than
the $160K that the Penguins Organization paid him last year.


Roger
From: catcher@netcom.com (Paul W. Francisco)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: ESPN Followup
Date: 3 Sep 92 20:47:43 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Night People

In article <1992Sep3.122302.27548@cs.rochester.edu> hoebel@cs.rochester.edu (Lou Hoebel) writes:
>Last year I had great viewing options.
>SportsChannel NY gave me NYI, NJ and MSG gave me the Rangers. We also
>get HNIC. SOme occasional late games from from SC Chicago and their
>wonderful anchor at his wonderful set. A choice of over 10 games a week
>and almost every night!

Which begs the (sarcastic) question:  Does anyone outside of New York
watch hockey?  And if so, should the NHL care and potentially cause
inconvenience to these people simply so the entire rest of the country
can see some games?

>I could care less if X million homes in Houston, Miami or Atlanta
>now have access to hockey......the sport ain't gonna make it done south!

Especially if no games are shown.  You never can tell what will happen
if people do get exposure, though.  

>Orgeon? Washington? Idaho? The NHL could get better viewing numbers
>in Europe on tape delay.

Speaking as a Seattle resident, this deal could very well make me recheck
my expenses, see if I really need to eat dinner every night, and sign up
for cable.  I know I'm not the only one here who feels this way.  Granted,
I don't know how many viewers they could get in Europe via tape delay, but
we'll do ok here, trust me.

-- 
Paul W. Francisco        	    In the shadow an angel cries...
catcher@netcom.com                      - Front Line Assembly
From: gp2f+@andrew.cmu.edu (Gary James Patalsky)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: ESPN-it's about time
Date: 3 Sep 92 15:20:29 GMT
Organization: Freshman, CIT general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


The NHL is finally going in the right direction with the new NHL contract.
It will increase U.S. exposure three fold (from 20 million to 60 million
cable subscribers.)  I am glad that they will have exclusive national
coverage of the playoffs.  This should only increase the popularity of
the NHL which will obviously strengthen the league.  Hopefully, ABC will
also become part of the package, which would allow of the U.S. to watch
America's most exciting sport.

"A National television contract is not a priority of the National Hockey
League"
    - The incompetent John Ziegler, who has stated this in different forms on
      different occasions.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: ab870@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Eric Rickin)
Subject: Instigators Ejected, No helmets OK!  2 resign
Reply-To: ab870@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Eric Rickin)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 12:52:17 GMT


Some things I remember from Today's NY Times article.
1) The 11 doves on the board (12 hawks w/ 1 undecided, Ottawa) forced a
compromise on the fighting rule.  13 votes are needed to pass a new
rule.  In any case, Instigators are ejected.

2) Players can choose NOT to wear a helmet/faceshield if they don't want
to.  (this is a significant rule change!)

3) An 800 # has been set up for trades during not League Office Hours.
During normal business hours, both teams must send a fax or have a
conference call to complete a trade.

4) Brian O'Neill and whats his face, the TV guy, resigned!  (YEAH!)

5) The NHL is negotiating with ESPN on Friday night games and playoff
coverage.

6) The NHL has the right to sell extra playoff and reg. season games to
ABC and ESPN.

7) The TV contract will bring in about $600,000+ to each team (if
completed, of course)

8) Also, the Board of Govs are looking into sending NHLers to the
Olympics.
-- 
Eric Rickin (ab870@cleveland.freenet.edu)
University of Michigan Class of 1996
East Quad - Cooley
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: kmjoffe@acs.ucalgary.ca (Kenneth M. Joffe)
Subject: Re: Them were the days
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 04:15:45 GMT
Organization: The University of Calgary, Alberta


Lastly, I do not obtain my hockey knowledge through cards alone
if that is what you were getting at.  By the way, I have not
found any cards from Calgary in the few packs I have bought.
Guess that means that the Flames folded this year.  Too bad.
From: golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: More new rules
Date: 27 Aug 92 11:33:44 GMT
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department

In article <farenebt.714873458@craft.camp.clarkson.edu> farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Bri Farenell) writes:
>In addition to the no more helmet, 4-on-4 and game misc. for fighters rules,
>ESPN reported two new rule changes.
>
>---High-sticking is now defined as above the waist.
>

This is supposed to be tested in preseason...I hope they don't panic...
because the immediate result will be an increase in penalties if they
call it...let's hope the league has the patience to stick with this
rule for the whole season.

>---Players who are judged to have taken a dive in order to draw a penalty, will 
>   be given a misconduct minor.
>

The repeal of the anti-Oiler rule is a good change also.

Gerald
From: seth@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (peter.r.clark..jr)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: NHL Salaries
Date: 4 Sep 92 15:33:02 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Sep4.140945.28585@bnr.ca>, lavergne@bcarh2b8.bnr.ca (Marc Lavergne) writes:
> The NHL Players Association released salary information on Wednesday.
> Eric Lindros will be the highest paid player this year at 3.5M. 
> Gretzky is 2nd at about 3M, Messier 3rd at 2.4M and Lemieux 4th
> at 2.3M. 
>  
> This is all expected to change soon. Gretzky, according to his
> contract and McNall, must always be the best paid player. Messier
> must always be at least the 3rd best paid player. With Lemieux's
> impending new contract, Lindros will quickly drop to the 4th best
> paid player in the league. Lemieux is expected to sign for about   
> 4M a year. I feel sorry with McNall who has to keep up with this
> pace. Messier can expect at least a 1.2M raise very soon.

A substantial portion of that 3.5 million for Eric includes his signing bonus.
I believe that the bonus was 2 million.

I could be wrong, but I seriously doubt that the above mentioned contracts
require the owners to match signing bouses as well as salary. I would
equally doubt that incentive bonuses have to be matched as well. Do you
think Gretzky is gonna make more money because Eric gets a monster bonus
for his 150 points this year?   :-) :-) :-)

pete clark jr - r.s.h FLYERS contact
Organization: Freshman, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 17:00:23 -0400 
From: Paul Andrew Platosh <pp21+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Whose got Tippet?

....poor dave...shoulda stayed in Hartford where we appreciated him.
==Paul
Xref: sparky rec.sport.hockey:15850 rec.sport.basketball.pro:16489
From: iacurtop@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Iacurto Paul)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey,rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Rodman
Date: 31 Aug 92 19:00:43 GMT
Organization: Universite de Montreal

In article <1992Aug31.185424.19309@cc.umontreal.ca> iacurtop@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Iacurto Paul) writes:
>
>I am a big Dennis Rodman fan, but most of the people I know do not like him. 
>I must therefore conduct my own Dennis Rodman poll. I would like as many
>replies as possible
>
>Dennis Rodman is
>a) An all star; the best rebounder in the NBA
>b) A good defensif player with run of the mill offensive skills
>c) A goofy looking guy with big ears, who also wears the tightest pair of
>   shorts in the NBA.
>
>
>
>
>Signe: Mr. Iacurtop
From: carrie@buckaroo.WPI.EDU (Carrie A Ayers)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: AHL off-season news
Date: 26 Aug 92 14:03:33 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute

In article <farenebt.714746534@craft.camp.clarkson.edu> farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Bri Farenell) writes:
>AHL OFF-SEASON NEWS
>
>In it's new emphasis on divisional play and cutting travel expenses, it was
>announced that 4 teams would not play the St John's Maple Leafs this season.
>They are Springfield, Utica, Binghamton and New Haven.

Well this may be cheaper, but the fans want to see ALL of the teams.  And what happens
around playoff time if these teams have to play each other and they haven't played them?
Neither one knows how the other plays.


>The expansion draft took a few top AHL players. Binghamton lost goalie Mark
>LaForest to Ottawa and Jeff Bloemberg to Tampa Bay. Ottawa also took Adirondack
>winger Lonnie Loach, Moncton defenseman Kent Paynter, Hershey forward Darren
>Rumble and Rochester's Brad Miller.

Ottawa also took Springfield's Blair Atcheynum  :(

 The Lightning also nabbed right wingers
>Shayne Stevenson from Maine and Keith Osborne of St John's as well as
>Fredericton goalie Frederic Chabot. Chabot was later traded back to the Habs
>for his teammate in Fredericton, J-C Bergeron.


>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>BRI FARENELL			    "Hockey must be a great game to survive 
>CLARKSON '95			           what the NHL has done to it."
>FARENEBT@CRAFT.CAMP.CLARKSON.EDU	---Howard Baldwin, Penguins owner
>
>rec.sport.hockey's (unofficial) AHL contact
> 
>GO ADIRONDACK RED WINGS! 	1992 CALDER CUP CHAMPIONS		
>				Calder Cup Champs: 1981 1986 1989 1992


Carrie

GO SPRINGFIELD INDIANS!!!!!!  
>
Organization: Administrative Systems, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 07:57:41 -0400 
From: "James J. Murawski" <jjm+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Whalers in Hartford (Was: Baldwin in Hartford)
	<BtoJ63.MCG@rice.edu>
Distribution: na


On 28-Aug-92 in Re: Baldwin in Hartford (Wa..
user Patrick L Humphrey@is.ri writes:
>existence.  He was none too popular after the Whalers moved to Hartford
>after their entry into the NHL in 1979, but folks forget that his Whalers
>were the WHA's first champions in 1973...so I wouldn't say he was too sleazy
>back then.

The Whalers didn't move to Hartford at the time of their entry into the NHL.
The Whalers played most of their WHA seasons in Hartford as the New England
Whalers (I believe it was only the first or first two years of the WHA that
they didn't play in hartford).  I went to several Whalers WHA games in
Hartford in the 1970s.

The Whalers had to play about a season and a half away from home in the late
1970s.  In January of 1977 (or maybe 1978), the roof of the Civic Center
collapsed under the weight of snow and ice at about 4AM when the place was
empty.  This caused the Whalers to play their home games in either New Haven,
CT or Springfield, MA until the Civic Center was repaired (and redesigned).

====================================================================
    Jim Murawski
    Sr. Data Base Analyst               (412) 268-2650  [office]
    Administrative Systems              (412) 268-6868  [fax]
    Carnegie Mellon University          jjm+@andrew.cmu.edu
    4910 Forbes Avenue                  Office: UCC 155
    Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
From: mds8539@tamuts.tamu.edu (Michael David Slater         )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Best and worst refs' poll
Date: 29 Aug 92 18:41:46 GMT
Organization: ~/lib/organization

In article <farenebt.715103589@craft.camp.clarkson.edu> farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Bri Farenell) writes:
>Poll:
>I am curious who each of you think are the best and worst refs in

Worst (most likely of all-time)
======= 
HOGARTH
HOGARTH
HOGARTH
HOGARTH
HOGARTH
HOGARTH


Crookedest (most likely of all-time)
==========
HOGARTH
HOGARTH
HOGARTH
HOGARTH
HOGARTH
HOGARTH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: edmondso@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov (Rich Edmondson)
Subject: Re: 2 New Rules ???
Organization: NASA/MSFC
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 17:26:32 GMT

Vip responds:

>>.......
>>Interesting to see how the big TV(ABC-ESPN) execs and major national
>>advertisers can influence the league. I guess money really talks..:-)
>>
>>-Mark

>The no-helmet-required rule could be the advertisers idea, because it does
>become hard for the occasional fan to recognize players without the helmets.\
                                                             ^^^
>Vip

Seems to me that it will difficult for the occasional fan to recognize
players with or without the helmets, but no more difficult than it is
for the occasional football fan to recognize players on the field.

On ESPN/ABC:

I sure hope that it comes to fruition.  ESPN Sportcenter said that
network officials said that no agreements had yet been made.  I don't
know if I can stand another year of Sportschannel.  You never know if
the hockey game is going to be preempted for equestrian or billiards.
I should give SC credit though.  They do a better job of covering
hockey than my paper does(n't).

Rich Edmondson, Huntsville, AL -- Hockey Capital of the South
Flyer Fan!
Admiral Fan!
Badger Fan!                       edmondso@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov