From: karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION...(What asshole started this thread anyway?)
Date: 16 Apr 92 19:00:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr16.130025.988

In article <4209@ucsbcsl.ucsb.edu>  writes:

> >Just because I said that I might not participate in oral sex, in
> >no way indicates that I believe being a normal heterosexual precludes
> >having oral sex.
 
> That's not how you responded.  You clearly implied that as a
> 'normal heterosexual', you did not engage in oral sex.  Does
> that mean you were simply begging the issue?

Wrong, as the weak minded idiot you are, you inferred that because
I gave a neutral response on the issue.
 
> And I told you, Mr. Breadstick, that I thought *others* might
> make that connection.  That you should actively distance yourself
> from the really psychotic types bumbling around here.  Otherwise,
> people might get the wrong idea.

I already have the wrong idea about many people on here, so 
why should I give a shit what they think about me?
 
> >In the above statement, given the context of this article, I detect
> >the presupposition that I associate with Strommie and RJ.
 
> No, (and excuse your syntax, pace Ellison), I warn you that others
> might surmise this, reading your posts.  Defend RJ's free speech.
> I do.  I don't want his accounts pulled to no purpose.  But you
> might tell us where you stand on his ravings.

And I might not.  My posts speak for themselves, and Ronnie can speak
for himself.  What are you trying to do here-coax an apology out of
me for the behaviour of others?
 
> >AND WHEN, WHY, WHERE, HAVE I ASSOCIATED WITH HIM OR STROMMIE? 
 
> I merely point out that you will be accused, Kreamy Lostship,
> by the people in various groups, of having similar views, unless
> you distance yourself from them.

What, are you their spokesman?  I could care less what "people in
various groups" have to say in the matter.  Let them come forth and 
flame, if they have the guts.  I'll associate with anyone I damn well
please, and it will take a lot more than you and the rest of alt.flame's
poitically correct patrol to change that.
   
> >> No
> >> where have I implied that you could do violence by e-mail, or that
> >> you would do violence if you had that opportunity.  Some of the
> >> things The Cartoon Character and RJ have posted hint or imply
> >> otherwise.  As you side with them (as one of the few 'active
> >> heterosexuals posting in alt.flame' or some such nonsense), you
> >> might want to be wary that others don't suppose you share the same
> >> view.
 
> >My view is loud and clear, and it's my own, not yours, not Ronnie's
> >and not Strommie's.            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
> Of this, there is no doubt.
 
> >They flame heterosexuals and homosexuals
> >alike, and so do I.
  
> So do you like what they say?  Do you agree with it?

Sometimes.
 
> >> Diversity of opinion?  Gays = bad, evil, immoral people, who molest
> >> children.  That's wonderful diversity of opinion, Wetwick.  I post
> >> to oppose stupid bigotry like your own.
 
> >That is your opinion on what my opinion is, but that is pretty
> >shallow and pretty far off.  I post to flame self-righteous assholes
> >who think they can tell everyone what to think.
 
> And I think you've yet to show that your so called diversity of
> opinion is more than bigotry.  If by whining "telling everybody
> what to think," you mean me, a) you are mistaken, Mr. Hardcheese,
> and b) attacking bigotry is hardly self-righteous.

We'll see about a).  b) is interesting, because I didn't know that such  
altruism, in it's purest  form, still existed in today's cold cruel world.  
You'd never know, that on alt.flame, of all places, there exists: 

Christopher Wade Skinner the Politically Correct Crusader

--- Defender of homosexuality
--- Advocate of Oral Sex
--- Opposer of Bigotry
--- Spokesperson for "people in various groups"
                         

Karsten Hendrick
karsten@nic.gac.edu
karsten@lavatch.gac.edu