HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Ipisissimus
Date: 14 Oct 92 20:38:55 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <Bw4L5M.D8r@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>>jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>>> ... phila. I'm not coming anymore.
>>>Too scared.
>
>>Oh, come on.  
>>Kiran and I were so looking forward to winning all your seesters...
>
>Actually, I just want his money.  
>You can have the seesters all to yourself.  *smile*

 Hah, hah. Now would someone care to take responsibility for bringing
poker chips. I'm not flying them in. 
Call me crabby and take my sisters.
 
================================================================================
 Ipsissimus of the Inner Order of Sesquipedalian Fruitcakes - IIOSF XOX Dawn
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Female geeks
Date: 15 Oct 92 18:43:49 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <15017@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
> 
>Those that are really good can apply makeup and talk on the cellular
>phone with that cute guy in the red BMW with the vanity plates at the
>same time.  

Do cute guys in red BMWs put their cellular phone numbers on those
vanity plates?  I didn't know those things had point-n-shoot
capabilities although that *is* an interesting concept:

*beep*  *beep*
"Hello?"
"Hello sir, I'm the lady in the blue Honda, if you look to your
right that's me, yes HI!, um, I'd like to thank you for cutting 
out in front of me like you just did!  Oh no, don't worry I can
get ANOTHER cup of hot coffee and say, you're kinda cute why
don't you pull over?  What?  No, it's not loaded ..."

Actually it might be kinda neat to be able to talk to someone in
another car in traffic by dialing their plate number like if you
need to tell them their door is slightly open or their flashers
are on or (in the case of geeks) that even though they are in a
nice private car EVERYBODY can see them eating their boogers ...
-- 
Nance Colucci  *^*^*^*^*^*    o__    *^*^*^*^*  |  Work that body!
att!ihlpk!colucci            _.>/               | Stay fit for life.
                            (_) \(_)                           
Xref: sparky soc.singles:27809 alt.romance:12714 alt.romance.chat:19423 talk.bizarre:34252
From: klaskala@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Henning Klaskala)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: How long has it been?
Date: 15 Oct 92 11:48:40 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: TUM

about 2 months + 1 day

hmmm... are you one of those guys who enjoy triggering long discussions
and counting (mega)bytes of followups?  ;-)

Henning
Xref: sparky soc.singles:27227 alt.sex:32321 talk.abortion:41305
From: wjb@moscom.com (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: More Questions we all wanted to ask
Date: 8 Oct 92 13:35:28 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford NY
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

drieux, just drieux (drieux@wetware.com) wrote:
: Ok, EVERY STOP WHAT YOU ARE DOING:
: 
: "Do You Know where YOUR Sir Richard is right now?"
Who wants to know?
-- 
Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com
From: wjb@moscom.com (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: WANTED WOMAN 27 +
Date: 14 Oct 92 19:09:58 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford NY
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.3 beta PL7]

Stef Jones (stef@Apple.COM) wrote:
: mgmsw@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (manchapora goutham) writes:
: 
: >I am looking for a mature warm  and sincere woman who is 27 +.
: 
: You know you've been reading the net too long when you blink at a post like
: this several times and you keep seeing: I am looking for a mature worm.
Now Stef, you know that what two mature individuals and their worm do
in the privacy of their bedroom is their own business.  Just nobody tell
the ASPCA.
-- 
Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com
From: wjb@moscom.com (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Female geeks
Date: 15 Oct 92 12:37:22 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford NY
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.3 beta PL7]

Edward V. Wright (ewright@convex.com) wrote:
: 
: You see, I warned you!  Next time, before you post something here,
: check with the soc.single political correctness committee, Nancy
: Colucci, chairman... er, chairwoman... chairhuman... chairhuperson...
: ehr, chairhuperoffspring (whew! :-), or her dancing chimp, Jimmy Dutton.
That, or look over your posting.  Does it look like something Ed Wright
might've posted?  If it does, kill it quick.  You too can practice
safe net.
-- 
Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: God's wonderful Plan For Your Life....
Keywords: Love,Romance, Relationships
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 10:57:35 GMT

aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
] 
] Fortunately for me, every time I've felt that way about a woman, she has
] been completely, totally, and unequivocally uninterested in me.

Have you considered Monastacism?

Or Maybe Finding a Real Replacement for UNIX[tm]?????

ciao
driuex


-- 
Modern Day Problems:
In any case, don't give up, just type slower :-).
Chimo
Bob.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: Boink?
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 03:36:06 GMT

   Was Eddie there? Now that would have been a real party!
The postings today were just missing something...Oh, It's
just not the same without him. Guess he started alt.ED WRIGHT,
and is too busy misrepresenting postings. What's all this rot
about Barbie? Kill that one...Food groups? nah! Now Earl Sinclair
is posting...What next?

   Anybody within 500 miles of Vancouver Island want to organize 
a Western Canada Boink? It'll have to be around Easter...OK how
about 1000 miles from here?

   Tell ya what. Why doesn't somebody E-mail me a tentative Boink
schedule? I'll get to at least one of them in the next year...

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tourf00@DMI.USherb.CA (Francis Tourillon <Tourfman>)
Subject: Re: wanted straight female
Organization: U de Sherbrooke -- LIIT adicts - ANS - Ascot Boyz - 
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 19:26:56 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.123700.1@opie.bgsu.edu> tb205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:
>hello my name is Mike. All i want is a straight female to send mail back and
>forth to, that is it. I am 21 yrs old(I will be 22 on OCT15), I have brown hair, deep blue eyes, i am

	<bla bla bull ....>

Scuse me but there's a problem of marketing here.  You're asking for a Woman to mail to, not to have sex with, so what's the deal to send your age, color of hair,...   In mail, the major factor a fantasy is IMAGINATION, so don't freeze the imagination in telling your physical description, and who knows if you're not 4'5'' and 200 lbs?

	What i like in your message is this sentence (I don't know if it was 
written consciently) "to send mail back and forth to"!!!   Hoooo!  That's the
way to make women inconsciently desirefull to write to you.

	Well, I don't know everything either... noticed my english?  In fact,
I'm french (from Quebec).

	I'll just finish by an annoncement:



Jeune ecervele desire ecrire des conneries a une figure desirant sourire un
peu...

Translation (more or less, the original language tell always more):
Young crazy wants to write things without any meanings to a face that will
be able to smile...

Tourf"qui va se faire niaiser bientot par toute l'universite"man
================================================================
tourf00@dmi.usherb.ca    <===


-- 
*=============================================================================*
*      L'ordinateur est ton ami, il ne faut pas en avoir peur...  NOT!!!      *
*     Appuyez Alt.ordinateur.sucks  |  Votez non le 26, nous meritons mieux.  *
*=============================================================================*
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Lookin for Karen Bishman
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 19:17:04 GMT

In article <ewillims.719083441@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>In <1992Oct13.203650.29292@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>
>>In article <1b4u90INNgjp@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>
>>>  "The Security Council yesterday afternoon passed a resolution demanding
>>>   that Trygve open up his dungeon to international inspection."
>
>>International inspection?  Does that mean they're sending Emma over?
>
>	Oh, you want me to come? Sure, anything for you, darling! (*laughter*)

Why, my dear, of course I do--repeatedly and enthusiastically.  

Trygve   (Faster?  Higher?  Lower?) 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Define "Single"
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 19:13:52 GMT

In article <Bw4r6q.KIE@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (Nance Colucci) writes:
>
>>Does participation in soc.singles imply that you are looking for
>>someone to have a relationship with and want to do so by having
>>them send you email?
>
>Well, if you are in fact single and participate, it probably means you
>are looking for a relationship.  

Nah, not at all--I'm sure that's true for some, but there are also people
like me who gave up years ago and are here just for entertainment value,
people who aren't looking but still happen to enjoy the conversation,
people who are here primarilly for the .sigSizeWars, and even contributors
who post here for the purpose of reinforcing their beliefs that the
reason they have been unsuccessful in relationships is entirely the
fault of a viscious and evil conspiracy on the part of everyone else on
the planet and completely unrelated to their attitudes or lack of personal
hygiene.


Trygve
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller)
Subject: Re: relationship gone to pot?
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 05:28:43 GMT

In article <6959.1787.uupcb@spacebbs.com> mike.mcaulay@spacebbs.com (Mike Mcaulay)  writes:
>
>barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
>
>-> Teri Miller (me) writes:
>-> >IMHO, if you need to do that so badly that it interferes with your
>-> >primary relationship, then yes, I think it's a self-destructive
>-> habit.
>-> But suppose your car _is_ your primary relationship?
>
>Exactly.  Or, more generally, what if one does not rank "primary
>relationship" first in one's personal table of values?
>
Then I don't really consider it a primary relationship.  If one needs
to do something so much that it takes precedence consistently over a
relationship with someone, then I don't consider that relationship to
be a primary one.  You may have a different definition.

>This thread makes me slightly queasy.  By disposition I tend to side
>with the pot-smoking, car-driving underdog in this scenario.  I don't
>believe there is a divinely-inscribed stone tablet that says "Thou shalt
>place primary relationships first!" and I resent the implication that
>there is.
>
If your primary relationship is with your automobile, why let a 
girlfriend come between you?  Believe it or not, I'm serious.  If 
your greatest joy is smoking pot, and that rates much higher with
you than a girlfriend, then I don't consider the girlfriend (assuming
she exists) to be a primary relationship.  

>The pot-smoking ex-SO mentioned in the original post may in fact be a
>totally weed-befuddled, going-nowhere-fast loser-type for all I know.
>But maybe not, and in general we can't assume that the ultimate be-all
>and end-all for every member of our species is to at all times be in a
>"primary relationship" to which all other interests and proclivities are
>secondary.  Possibly the dude in question just got bored with the
>relationship and decided to get baked for a while.
>
How nice of him to act in an obnoxious manner towards his girlfriend.
After all, if he's bored, why not just dump the bitch?  Better still,
*don't* dump the bitch - leave her hung out to dry in case he has a use
for her later.  After all, he might run out of pot, and having her 
around is better than staring at the walls waiting for the next
delivery.

I don't think the be-all and end-all is to be in a primary relationship.
I *do* think that, if 2 people have a relationship, that they each 
deserve to be treated with respect and decency by the other half.

I don't think that indulging oneself in a compulsive behavior to the  
point of neglecting the other person is respectful or decent.  Sorry.
If you want to revel in an addiction, knock yourself out.  I just don't
think it's appropriate to hurt anyone else while doing it, even if it's
"just" through neglect.

And, yes, while I do like Kenn Barry a lot, and think he is a terrific
person, if he asked me over to lunch, then said he was going to polish
his car, I'd do the decent thing and leave the two of them alone together.

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: richwing@leland.Stanford.EDU (Rich Wingerter)
Subject: Re: New Orleans vs. Fox TV
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 05:35:28 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.153911.26937@cbnewsd.cb.att.com>, nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
[New Orleans maligned by the Simpsons]
|> The commentators
|> on the radio played the song and their consensus was, "Yeah?  So? It's
|> TRUE!!"
|> 
|> Sure.  Anyone else have an opinion??

Yes, it's true.  Everyone there seems to have their hand in your pocket.  At
least, they did when I was there a few years back.  (I'm sure there are lots of
hard working, decent people in New Orleans, etc., etc.)


--Rich Wingerter
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Female geeks or Ed the stalker.
Date: 14 Oct 92 20:23:43 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Oct14.185453.6912@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>In article <ewright.719078781@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>
>
>Actually, the intelligent ones among us are those who make optimum
>use of our time *and* look good.  :-)
>
>>The soc.singles PC line goes like this: Spending time improving
>>your appearance does not reduce the number of hours you have
>>available for reading and learning.  Since you cannot improve
>>your mind with maximum efficiency at all times, spending hours
>>in front of the makeup mirror provides the necessary "down time"
>>you need to recharge.  Plus, it reduces stress, improves your
>>state of mind, and allows you make more productive use of the
>>time you do spend reading and learning.  Thus, you can get more
>>total "mental enhancement points" if you spend a few hours every
>>day painting your face.
>
 
 Hi Eddie wrote that. He's my friend. Sometimes I hang wit the Ed man,
the Ed meister, The Edster. He's cool. I mean really cool. Not like
you low lifes.  Your poop. Ed's got the answer's. Any damnable fool knows ya
can't work out if ya don't bath. So lay off Ed. See. Or you've had it.
Now back off real slow. Ed's got a wash cloth and I know how to use it.
 
 
================================================================================
 Ipsissimus of the Inner Order of Sesquipedalian Fruitcakes - IIOSF XOX Dawn
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
From: rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: BalloonBoink, an Insider's Story
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 92 21:18:17 MDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Wild Rose Refugee Camp

kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
> shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller) writes:
> >Lunch itself was a very filling experience: Lou and I traded bites of
> >lunch, and when dessert came, it turned into a feeding frenzy!
> 
> Sounds delightful!  But--WHERE was lunch?  La Tertulia?  Coyote Cafe?
> Rancho de Chimayo?  (OK, I know, that's in Chimayo, but the drive thru

The Ore House, if memory serves.  We chose it because we were standing
in front of it when we all decided it was time to eat *now*.  Good place.

-- Ray

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Dating an older woman
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 13:46:02 GMT

In article <73222@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston) writes:
>
>>Aristotle recommended that husbands be 19 years older than their wives.
>>Actually he was more specific; he suggested that men marry at the age of
>>37 and women at 18.  He justified the age difference on the grounds that
>>the couple would be entering their sexual decline together.
>
>I thought that the sexual peaks were the other way around - the male's at
>18, and the female's at 35.
>--
>Stef                           Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...

SHHHHhhhhh. (whispered) Your right. Typo? Insane? Just watch.
 
================================================================================
 Ipsissimus of the Inner Order of Sesquipedalian Fruitcakes - IIOSF XOX Dawn
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.politics.homosexuality,talk.bizarre
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Re: Ok, Lets Do it Right the First time
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 02:43:25 GMT

kkwwkk@mixcom.com (TA Shaw) writes:
] 
] I think the question was stated corectly the first time.  Had
] Neely(?) wanted to know when the last time you had been kissed
] by a member of the same sex, KBMSS, he would have said so.
] 
] Ergo I say the question stands...

ok BDC,

Now the Important Sub_text Question:

was he referring to a:

1. platonic kiss

2. aristitilian kiss

3. Hegelian Kiss

4. Witgenstinian Kiss...

5. Godelian Kiss

Sub_text_Question II

Is there a Systemic Difference in the Nuerological Data Derived from:

1. a Non_Platonic Kiss Between Members of the Same Gender

2. a Platonic Kiss between Members of Differing Genders

3. A Godelian Kiss of a member of the Class of Schrodinger Felinus Domesticatus

4. A Neo_Platonic Kiss Between Members of Differing Religions

5. A Hegelian Kiss between Members of Opposing Ontological Theory Supporters.


Please Be Specific, and Use Clearly Annotated 
References, as well as Providing the Means
of Falsification of the Proposition.

ciao
drieux




-- 
Modern Day Problems:

ME? engage in Hyperbole?
I have rarely been more than a first Order Function!!!!
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: Re: Humans as Physical Creatures.
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 92 02:38:54 GMT

In article 4629@moscom.com, wjb@moscom.com (Bill de Beaubien) writes:
>Herb Huston (huston@access.digex.com) wrote:
>: In article <4606@moscom.com> wjb@moscom.com writes:
>: >July 18th, 39736 B.C.  Any other questions?
>: 
>: Yes.  Was that on the Julian Calendar or the Gregorian Calendar?
>
>Well, I was going to skip this, but I thought about it.  I assume most
>dates before the calendar reformation are still reckoned by the Julian
>calendar, but I'm not really sure.  Are they?

I don't know about you all, But I like the AZTEC calendar.

Andy.

IGNORANCE disclaimer applies



Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Nice guys getting flamed (was Re:Relationship gone to pot?)
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 15:51:23 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.145602.21527@almserv.uucp> s5uagm@fnma.COM writes:
> In article 16758@cbfsb.cb.att.com, jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>
>> Is it wrong for a man to prance about as a naked gladiator?
>
>How does one tell a naked gladiator from from a naked shoesalesman?
>
>			- Andrew

 On the east coast:
 From from the length of his sword.
 
 On the west coast:
 From from the length of his plume.
 
 In Chicago:
 From from the length of his shoehorn - aka Big Al.
 
================================================================================
 Ipisissimus of the Inner Order of Sesquipedalian Fruitcakes - IIOSF XOX Dawn
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
From: rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: How Important Is Being IN-LOVE?
Keywords: Love,Romance, Relationships
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 22:58:17 MDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Wild Rose Refugee Camp

kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:

> rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink) writes:
> >But sooner or later, the reality of who these two people *actually* are 
> >will surface; maybe the relationship can survive that, maybe not. 
> 
> And maybe it is that very reality that inspires those feelings of
> passion.  Maybe the relationship thrives on that reality, on the
> (shared) knowledge of who those people actually are.
> ....
> To be seen and to be understood and to be valued for what is important
> to _you_ is the foundation of romantic love.  There's nothing
> "blind" or "unconditional" about it at all.  It's the love of two
> souls who perceive each other clearly, and value what they see. 
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
An *excellent* definition of a healthy relationship, IMHO. I'd call
this "loving" rather than "in-love", though (to use Allisson's original
terms).  My observation/experience is that "in-love" (the intense attraction,
euphoria, etc) particularly at the beginning, tends not to see very clearly.

-- Ray

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Define "Single"
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 92 18:04:22 GMT

In article <31288@hydra.Helsinki.FI> taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina) writes:
>In <1992Oct15.183232.835@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>
>>{Note: previous distribution was 'usa'.  Although I'm not in the habit
>>of doing so for this newsgroup, I reset it, and am quoting the entire
>>article.}
>
>Thanks, at least I appreciate it.  The distribution flag is useful
>especially when you are talking about very local things, but most
>topics are general enough to be distributed to every country.  For
>instance, I think that boink announcements are very interesting.  I've
>often wondered what people would say if I appeared in one of them. :)

Well, you should--I think they even usually have a prize for the person
travelling the greatest distance to get there.  (Hmmmm...maybe I ought 
to have one myself and give away this old console TV....)