HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: smsmith@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Smith)
Subject: Re: Why I'm sticking with Windows
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 21:50:03 GMT

donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn) writes:

>smsmith@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Smith) writes:
>/>So tell us Donald, what system will you be running NT on?
>
>Well lets see, the Silicon Graphics Indigo?, the microVax?, the Sun?, the new
>486?  perhaps even this Convex multiprocessor supercomputer?

Oh that's right.  The university you went to gives out free computers,
I forgot.  

BTW, I'm picking up my $1000 Indigo machine (fully loaded) at KMart 
next week.

Get real!  Haven't you been reading all the complaints about the
system requirements for OS/2 2.0?  You yourself have complained 
MANY times that OS/2 won't work on your PC because you can't afford
to upgrade it!  But you're going to suggest that everyone go out and
buy a MicroVax or Sun or Indigo or 586???

Steve Smith
From: joel@upchrch.UUCP (Joel Upchurch  )
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 and Stacker 2.0 - Conclusion?
Date: 15 Apr 92 03:44:44 GMT
Organization: Upchurch Computer Consulting, Orlando FL

mpolen@gelato.mips.com (Michael Polen) writes:

> In article <odukIwm00WB403hkIL@andrew.cmu.edu>, rh0i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Richard
> |> So, what exactly *is* the story with Stacker 2.0 and Win 3.1.  What
> |> is the problem?
> |> 
> What problem?  I am using both with no problems.  Of course you do need
> to read the documentation and the readme files with windows 3.1 and stacker
> to get the best out of the combination.

Ditto. The combo works fine for me also. In fact, according the Windows
Resource Kit, SMARTDRV has special code in it to make sure it works
properly with Stacker.

(If your mail bounces use the address below. My map entry is new.)
Joel Upchurch/Upchurch Computer Consulting/718 Galsworthy/Orlando, FL 32809
joel@peora.ccur.com {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd,ucf-cs}!peora!joel (407) 859-0982
From: award@farside.auspex.com (Andrew Ward)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: HELP! 3.1 <call to undefined dynalink...>
Date: 16 Apr 92 23:09:43 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems

What can cause a call to undefined dynalink in 3.1 when I start
windows write, or paint or a few other apps?

I'm running W 3.1, NDW 2.0, SBPRO, Qemm386, ASPI4dos

After this happens, nothing works, NOTHING. I have to HARD RESET the machine.

Ideas please!

Andrew Ward
award@auspex.com
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: skelly@bucknell.edu (sean kelly `94)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Smartdrv (Was: Re: Win 3.1 and Cache Programs)
Date: 14 Apr 92 16:56:35 GMT
Organization: Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pa.

In article <1992Apr12.055920.3068@midway.uchicago.edu>, gac2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Geoffrey A. Coulter) writes:
> 
> And another question: how well does it interact with SCSI harddisks?
> With SCSI busmastering host adapters?
> 
I'm using an Always IN2000 SCSI adapter with a Seagate 270N hard drive (stacked), Qemm and Smartdrive with the /Double-Buffering option.  I had to set the VirtualHDirq=no is system.ini and I can't use 32-Bit disk access, but it works fine.  Not being able to use the 32-Bit disk stuff does slow down reads a bit but the stacked smartdrive buffer helps.  No problems yet.

-Sean
From: ede140r@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (N. Michelis)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: FREELANCE FOR WIN linking problem.
Date: 15 Apr 92 23:49:07 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.

Freelance Graphics for Windows does seem to allow me to link a graphic selection inside a word for windows 2.0 document.  WFW2.0 doesn't seem to recognise that FLW exists when I try to use the Paste Special Option, even though the picture is able to be viewed inside the clipboard.  

Anyone outthere with both Freelance for Win and Word for Windows 2.0 had similar problems and If so how did they solve these.

Lotus is still looking into it.  That was a fortnight ago.

Microsoft says it is a Freelance problem.
Lotus says it is a Word for Windows problem.
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Saturday, 11 Apr 1992 01:44:43 EDT
From: <DRB125@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Control Panel - Print and International

For some reason I can't seem to get the printer icon under control panel to
work right.  If I go to change a printer, it tells me that my setup.inf or
control.inf in my system directory are bad.  It then tells me to copy them
back over top my orginals.  I did this with no success.  Everything else
seems to be working just great.  Anyone help on what might be the
problem????

                         Thanks in advance,
                                           Jeff
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Bugs 3.1 aka win3.1
From: stefan@olson.acme.gen.nz (Stefan Olson)
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 92 07:01:55   Y

rocker@desire.wright.edu writes:

> 	Is anyone else finding 3.1 to be VERY buggy?  So far, after 6 hours
> I've already had the following:
> 
> 		Program Manager chashed and I wasn't doing anything with 
> 			it at the time.  This left me with no other way to exit
> 			windows then rebooting.

That's strange!!

> 		Mouse disappeared, don't know when or where, just gone.

That's also strange...

>               Cann't find WINDEBUG.DLL?  Where is this?  FTPable? Borland?

Yeah, look back through the recant messages, the FTP site was in there.  It
will go up on to cica soon...  The DLL is there, it just doesn't like using
it with a different version...

> 		Icon title wrap of a minized long title douple spaces.

Change it in the control panel...

I hope this has helped,
Stefan

P.S: You should have read your manaul re (5) before you posted, it's all in
there...

Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.sys.mac.misc
From: chuj@horton.Colorado.EDU (CHU JEFFREY)
Subject: Re: PC is cheaper than MAC (Yeah, right.)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 04:23:13 GMT

For those who are looking to invest in a HydraCard(MAC compat for pc).
Better wait til later this year.  There is a new card for the pc that
allows emulation of an ATARI ST(STE).  And it is rumored that it can
handle a emulation of an MAC as well.  ATARI ST emulating an MAC would
run close to 30% faster than a standard MAC, the GEMULATOR under
a dos window (windows 3.0 or OS/2) can run all STE rez and capable of
4096 colors(don't know how this is done).  Using a 486-33, the Gemulator
is faster than the ST computer (68000 - 8Mhz), it is around 68000 16Mhz.
And under Windows, you can have multiple sessions, such as RGB ST in
one window, and mono ST in the other, yet if the MAC emulation in another
window.  The MAC emulation is a MAC PLUS emulation.  The card itself
is starting introductry at $250.00 w/o ROMS.  There is a whole discussion
going on at comp.sys.atari.st.
It is quite interesting to now have an ST and a MAC under windows session
yet running at full speed and able to emulate all rez of the ST and mono
on the MAC.
I tested the SoftPC on my new LC II 030-16Mhz, it's impressive to see
EGA in a window, but the speed is only 1.6Mhz AT speed.
From: friesenda@skyfox.usask.ca
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: RE: Why go to 3.1 if 2.0 works
Date: 13 Apr 92 00:34:40 GMT
Organization: University of Saskatchewan

In a previous article, jinli@dgp.toronto.edu (Jin Li) wrote:
> 
>UI for OS/2 is quite confusing and is very different from Windows 3.x
>If you run DOS, Windows 3.x and OS/2 app at the same time, you will
>be confused quickly and will likely get frustrated.
> 
>There are lots of inconsistency within OS/2 and between Windows 3.x
>and OS/2.  e.g. in OS/2, left mouse btn is used for selection only and
>right mouse btn is for dragging.  In Windows 3.x, left btn is for selection
>and dragging.  You will have "fun" with this for hours.  In OS/2, you
>can thread the floppy drive (icon).

Both these points are *extremly* lame. Although I don't have OS/2 2.0
(yet), my understanding is that the Presentation Manager is very much
like the Win3.x interface (mouse usage etc). The 'confusing and very
different' interface is the new Workplace Shell (have a look at the
latest PC-MAG for a description).  If simple looks or mouse usage
differences (which I'm sure anyone could overcome in less than a
half hour) is a major deterrent stopping Windows users from moving
to OS/2, how the hell did they make the jump from DOS to Windows
in the first place?!

I do agree with your last point about trying them both then choosing.
If worst comes to worst, you'll lose the installation time and maybe
$10 on the product you don't like (unless you are getting those cheap
upgrades; you could probable sell you cheap copy to some unsuspecting
chump and MAKE $10 or $20).

----------
Darryl Friesen          
Univ. of Saskatchewan
friesenda@sask.usask.ca
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: altman@sbpmt.cs.sunysb.edu (Jeff Altman)
Subject: Re: HELP: Windows 3.1
Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 16:35:10 GMT


Make sure all of the files in your SYSTEM directory are READ WRITE.
Make sure you start the install process from the floppy drive.

The version number listed in the Program Manager Help box is the
version number of the Program Manager and not Windows.

You may very well be running Win 3.1 but are still using the old
Program Manager, File Manager, etc.

--
- Jeff  | Altmania Productions     |================================|
 ~   ~	| 322 Old Town Road        | jaltman    @ ccmail.sunysb.edu |
 * | *	| East Setauket, New York  | altman     @ sbcs.sunysb.edu   |
\_____/	| 11733                    | 71530.3252 @ CompuServe.COM    |
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: kji@vpnet.chi.il.us (Ken Isacson)
Subject: Re: Gates - Comdex - Windows 3.1
Organization: Vpnet Public Access
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 03:40:08 GMT

The new font options on DOS apps running in a Window are very nice with Windows
3.1.  With Windows 3.1 you can save the font you selected and the position of
your DOS apps's window for future sessions.  A real nice feature that should
have been there in version 3.0.

-- 
__________________________________________________________
Ken Isacson         
kji@vpnet.chi.il.us    
__________________________________________________________
From: ST802200@BROWNVM.BROWN.EDU (Rob Ryan)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: SoundBlaster and DSP v1.05
Date: 9 Apr 92 17:33:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.9204091736.AA28002
Organization: Brown University

In reply to jsmolnar@descartes.waterloo.edu on Tue, 7 Apr 1992 20:48:52 GMT:

Hmm.  I have the SoundBlaster with the DSP v1.05 and it does not work.
I have other Windows software (Sound Tools v2.5) which can play the
.WAV files that came with Windows, but the Windows driver just doesn't
work.  It sounds like the frequency is off, but if I use Sound Tools to
edit the files and expand them, it doesn't work either.  It sounds like
certain cycles simply aren't being produced.  Also, there is a 2-4 second
delay when trying to produce a sound.

Maybe it's something else, but I've been working under the assumption that
since the .WRI docs explicitly suggest that DSP v2.0 is necessary, that this
will fix it.

>From: jsmolnar@descartes.waterloo.edu
>Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 20:48:52 GMT
From: friesenda@skyfox.usask.ca
Subject: RE: Need to knows UWarchives IP address
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 23:25:42 GMT

In a previous article, phuongn@sail.LABS.TEK.COM (Phuong Ngoc Nguyen) wrote:
> 
> need to know the UWARCHIVES IP address or someone could show me 
>how to ftp to it.

Try this:

     ftp wuarchive.wustl.edu

You should see some message about a connection being established.
At the "FTP>" prompt type:

     login anonymous

You will be asked next to enter your e-mail address as a password.

That's it! The mirrors/msdos directory conatins a mirror of the
public domain software found at wsmr-simtel20.army.mil.  The
mirrors/win3 directory is a mirror of cica.cica.indiana.edu. There
are others there as well, like garbo.uwasa.fi (?), but the cica and
simtel mirrors will probably contain whatever files you are looking
for.

Check for index files to avoid spending hours looking for stuff.

>Thanks,
>phuongn@sail.labs.tek.com


----------
Darryl Friesen
friesenda@sask.usask.ca
Univ. of Saskatchewan
From: rick@mathcs.sjsu.edu (Richard Warner)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Why I'm sticking with Windows
Date: 16 Apr 92 16:17:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: mathcs.1992Apr16.161739.16958
Organization: San Jose State University - Math/CS Dept.

donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn) writes:

>In article <1992Apr15.215003.19537@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> smsmith@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Smith) writes:
>/>donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn) writes:
>/>
<< Stuff Deleted >>

>Steve, why be so darn caustic.  The 2 Indigo's we have were bought to
>run high powered molecular modelling software - Charm and Quanta, the
>MicroVax - the Genetics Computer Groups DNA analysis program.  It is
>going to be great having a crossplatform OS like NT so that we won't
>have to buy a separate computer for every application and so that we
>can put these expensive pieces of hardware to work doing more mundane
>things like running Word for Windows, Excel, Corel Draw, etc.. instead
>of gathering dust between their normal few hours a week use.

You are making some assumptions.  First, that the molecular modelling
S/W will be ported to NT.  Ditto for the DNA analysis S/W.  Until this
is true, will you be willing to give them up for NT and stuff that 
can be run on a much cheaper box (W4W, etc.)?  You are also assuming
that you are going to get some support for running NT on these
platforms.  SGI's commitment to ACE and therefore NT seems to be
rather lukewarm.  Same for DEC. 
Don't let that IRIX software maintenance plan expire
just yet.  Ditto for ULTIX.  You will need to upgrade the Indigo 
(R3000 -> R4000, put in a better video system [the 8-bit color probably
will not fly under NT], bigger disk, etc.), and given SGI's pricing you
had better have a better reason for spending my tax dollars on that than
'now I can run my word-processor on it'.  Ditto for the MicroVAX.

Let's face it.  NT is an empty promise at the moment, and I think any
sane person who spends someone else's money had better make sure that
a lot of that promise is fulfilled before committing $$$ to Redmond.

>--
>Donald A. Lehn, Ph.D.                      Phone: (301) 496-2885
>Bldg.37 Rm 3D20                            FAX:   (301) 496-8419
>National Cancer Institute / NIH            Email: donnel@helix.nih.gov
>Bethesda MD 20892
From: sinenmaa@cc.helsinki.fi
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Win31 vs Win30, help
Date: 14 Apr 92 08:24:38 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki

Hi, on the last saturday I upgraded my Win30 to win3.1. Soon after it
I had doubts about the speed of the new upgrading. Yesterday I did
the following things;



   QEMM386  &  HYPERDISK (registered );

Main System;                DOS5          WIN3.1         WIN3.0

Video Speed(chr/s)          6180          5536           6039

Math Speed(whetstones)       75.8          70.5           75.8


Harddisk;

Seek Time  (ms)              0.1            0.2           0.1

Track to Track (ms)          0.1            0.2           0.1

Transfer Speed (k/s)        4920           2460.1        4100.1


   QEMM386   &  SMARTDRIVE  2048  1024


                 new SMARTDRV                   older SMARTDRV
               **********************           ************

                WIN3.1       WIN3.0                 WIN3.0

Video Speed     5905         5777                    5654

Math Speed       70.6         70.6                    70.6


Seek Time        24.4         24.4                    23.8

Track to Track    5.6          5.6                     5.6

Transfer Speed   531.9        351.4                  2460.1


System; 386/20 6MB  HD 105MB

Free mem for appl. QEMM386.sys  = 638kB   HIMEM.SYS  = 585kB

LoadTime for WIN3.1 = 20 s ,  for WIN3.0 = 17 s

Load Time for an appl. ( the Earth Centered Universe = ECU registered )

       WIN3.1 = 10 s     WIN3.0 = 12 s ?


Now I need the advice, How can I run my new upgrading at least
as  fast as my older one ? Are there any who has the same problem ?

Please, answer to this group or me
all the best,  kati 
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc
From: jjm13@po.cwru.edu (Jeff Murphy)
Subject: Re: Why go to 3.1 if 2.0 works
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 19:42:57 GMT

In article <nmwjzwa.rcain@netcom.com> rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain) writes:
>Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes:
>: 
>: By the same argument, Windows won't go anywhere either. It defaults to 2e8 on
>: Com3 and 2e0 on Com4. I don't know about the rest of the world, but my machine
>: thinks otherwise. So Com3 and Com4 wouldn't work until I changed the sys.ini
>: file.........
>:  
>Steve, sorry guy but I am composing this from a DOS window of WIN3.0 using
>my comm software.  I only needed to tell my comm software that my modem was
>on com3 at irq7 and address 3e8.  I didn't have to do anything to windows.
>My comm software also knows this in a DOS window of OS/2 but that's not good
>enough.

Well, any DOS program running under Windows goes directly to the hardware.
Windows doesn't know or care that your comm software is using the com port.
Thus, you don't have to set anything in Windows for the software to work.
DOS programs running under OS/2, on the other hand, interact with the 
hardware by way of OS/2 virtual device drivers.  These insulate the 
DOS sessions from the actual hardware, allowing OS/2 to keep full control
of the machine.  Because your DOS program has to go through OS/2 to get
to the com port, you have to let OS/2 know about it also.  Otherwise, how
can it allow the DOS program to access it?

Jeff
From: D.A.Nelson@newcastle.ac.uk (David Alan Nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: PRINTER DRIVER
Summary: Looking for driver for diablo 630
Date: 6 Apr 92 12:47:50 GMT
Organization: University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, NE1 7RU

Does anyone out there know if it is possible to obtain a printer driver to run
under Windows 3.

The printer driver in question is for the Diablo 630 Daisywheel printer.  It
should be known as something like 'D630.prn'.

The printer is to be mainly used from within the Microsoft Write program, and is
really just required for basic letter writing.

I would really appreciate it if anyone knew of such a thing, or if anyone had
this printer driver.

Please could you reply by e-mail to:

        D.A.Nelson@uk.ac.newcastle

Thanks for any replies.


David A Nelson

User ID : n1zlp
Mail ID : D.A.Nelson@uk.ac.newcastle
From: u5557908@ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Canon BJ300 driver wanted
Date: 7 Apr 92 04:40:41 GMT
Organization: The University of Melbourne

Sometimes ago a kind soul has email a win3 driver for the Canon BJ300,
330 printer to me, however the driver was lost when my hard disk crashed, before
I can test it. Anyone out there have this driver? I have look through the supl.
disk in simtel and oak, although there are bj130 and bj10e drivers which will
work but not the bj300 or bj330. Please email the driver to me or point me to
the right direction. I will then upload to simtel and other sites for ftp.
Thank you

Ronnie Li
From: shapiro@trade.enet.dec.com (Steve Shapiro)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Where is win3.1?
Date: 7 Apr 92 12:39:52 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


>where is win3.1?
>
>if the don't get it to me today i think msoft should refund
>the shipping charges....

Whine whine whine.  8-)

Mine arrived today just after noon via Federal Express. There was a BIG sticker
on the box indicating that it NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES be delivered before
April 6.

This whole thing seems silly to me. After all this time, another day or two
here and there is no big deal. Especially since I will probably not have any
time until this next weekend to spend the time installing it and making sure
that all my software works with it.

Too many 'type A' people out there. 8-)

Regards,
Steve.

/*********************************************************************
*                               *                                    *
* Steve Shapiro                 * All views and opinions expressed   *
* SKS Computer Consulting, Inc. * are my own and do not neccessarily *
* Specializing in:              * reflect those of my clients,       *
* DEC/VAX/VMS/ULTRIX, Unix & PC * employers or employees             *
*                               *                                    *
*********************************************************************/
From: axa12@po.CWRU.Edu (Ashok Aiyar)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: CICA's new address and IP number
Date: 15 Apr 92 13:31:19 GMT
Article-I.D.: usenet.1992Apr15.133119.24814
Reply-To: axa12@po.CWRU.Edu (Ashok Aiyar)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)


There was a request for CICA's new address and IP number.

It is FTP.CICA.INDIANA.EDU (129.79.20.84)

Hope this helps.

Ashok
-- 
  Ashok A. Aiyar   Department of Biochemistry   CWRU Med. School
   		       axa12@po.cwru.edu
		   aiyar@cwbio.bioc.cwru.edu
                Visit the IBM-PC Sig on Freenet
From: neptune@netcom.com (Dwayne Farley)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: more bugs in 3.1
Date: 17 Apr 92 15:16:37 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

As the PCMagazine article said, some people use virtual desktop software
and may want a copy of the clock on each virtual desktop.

Dwayne
Xref: sparky comp.windows.ms:11770 comp.os.os2.misc:10664
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: MS's deceitful advertising for Windows 3.1
From: jstewart@desire.wright.edu
Date: 6 Apr 92 21:44:28 EST
Organization: Wright State University 

In article <1992Apr1.210913.17019@access.digex.com>, terryfry@access.digex.com (Terry Fry) writes:
> In article <1992Mar31.211155.3189@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> ffujita@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Frank Fujita) writes:
>>timb@ecst.csuchico.edu (Timothy Berger) writes:
>>>>Until an employee can be *fully* up and adminstering it in a
>>>>couple hours it won't sell here.
>>>Training doesn't have to be all at once.
>>
>>How about this for a first session.
>>     1) This is how you open a DOS box.
>>     2) Now do what you always did.
>>     3) If you want to learn more, fine, if not, that's fine too.
>>
>>Why does an employee need to be '*fully*' up in a couple of hours?
>>Frank Fujita
>>
>>
> 
>       4) Determine why DOS won't run, why the Windows session crashed, or
> what the hell a HIMEM.sys is
> 
> More accurate?

	Cept for the windows session crashing, theses sound more like problems
that you would have with windows not os/2.  I haven't seen a single ref. to
himem.sys under os/2.  Dos emulation is much more likely to fail under Windows
than OS/2.  As to windows session crashing...who knows(maybe UAE), but in most
cases, unlike a UAE in wondows, you'll only lose what was in that session
instead of the entire OS.

btw, from what little I've heard on win3.1 it sounds like what it does in the
case of a uae is it just re-checks it's internal data to see if it's been
corrupted if it detects a memory access violation...really high-tech there. 
Oh, feel free to correct me if I'm wring:)

						John Stewart


Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: mmccolli@ess.harris.com (Mike McCollister)
Subject: Re: AmiPro 2.0 and Win 3.1
Reply-To: mmccolli@ess.harris.com
Organization: Harris (Government Aerospace Systems)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 11:36:36 GMT

--I dragged my AmiPro icon over to the startup folder so it would boot up every
--time I loaded windows.  I worked fine.  Then I decided that I wanted AmiPro
--loaded every time I loaded windows, but I wanted it to run minimized.
--So, I edited the properties of the AmiPro icon to have it run minimized.
--But, then whenever I start windows, I get a divide by zero error from ami.
--I've duplicated the problem over and over and it only occurs when AmiPro is
--set to run minimized.  Any ideas?  I'll try calling lotus today.  I'm using
--Win 3.1 and Ami 2.0.
--                            Garrick Blalock

It's a bug that Lotus is working on.

Mike