HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: File structure for TeX and friends: questions.
From: hafner@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz (Dr. Paul R Hafner)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 22:10:22 GMT
Organization: University of Auckland, New Zealand.


I am reasonably well acquainted with a traditional setup of TeX in
/usr/local/lib/tex etc. In planning an update of TeX, some questions arose
for which I invite comment.

* Overall system philosophy *

   Our administrator is in the process of changing all (?) applications
   into a structure with paths 
                                   _ bin
                                  |
                                  |_ doc
                                  |
       .../myapplication/current/
                                  |_ lib
                                  |
                                  |_ man

   Here, <current> is a link to a directory, say 'version1.1'.
   The main idea is that upgrades to new versions can be made quite simply,
   by compiling and testing in a directory ..../myapplication/version1.2/...
   The final installation then consists in making the link from current to
   version1.2.

* TeX considerations *

   TeX, mf, bibtex and friends seem to be so totally interwoven that I have
   doubts that it makes sense to split them completely into 3 such setups:
   .../TeX/current/... , .../MetaFont/current/... , .../BibTex/current/...
   (but correct me if you think I am wrong on this point!). And exactly 
   where would dvips fit into it?

   Somewhat independent of the general setup is the question for a
   rational setup of fonts (and inputs). Is it worth structuring 
   .../TeX/current/lib/fonts any deeper than into tfm, pk, vf? e.g. to
   accommodate entire groups of fonts in diretories of their own (the same
   qustion is also relevant for TeX and mf inputs).

   Are the hassles of insisting on a logical structure too great to make
   the exercise worthwile?


I would be glad to have comments of any general nature on these problems.
In particular:

   1) are we asking for unnecessary trouble by deviating from the 'norm'
      --- or is it worth starting a new trend?

   2) if the overall scheme is adopted for TeX etc, what would in your
      opinion be the most desirable file structure?

Thanks in advance,

Paul


+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Paul Hafner                  'phone +64 9 373-7999 x 5748      |
|  Department of                 fax   +64 9 373-7457             |
|    Mathematics and Statistics                                   |
|  University of Auckland                                         |
|  Private Bag 92019                                              |
|  Auckland, New Zealand.        time   gmt +12 (13) (summer time)|
|  latitude  S 36^ 51' 15.3''    longitude  E 174^ 45' 46.6''     |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
From: manis@cs.ubc.ca (Vincent Manis)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: TeX and Grammatik
Date: 5 Jan 93 02:26:27 GMT
Organization: The Invisible City of Kitezh
NNTP-Posting-Host: columbia.cs.ubc.ca

Does anyone have any words of wisdom about using Grammatik V with TeX? I
had thought to write a filter which will comment out TeX constructions
(e.g., math, control sequences, and tilde's, along with some custom
things of my own, such as @...@ meaning ``this is a computer program''),
and pass the result on to Grammatik V. The result could then be reverse
filtered back into TeX. 

Has anyone done this? Is it usable? 


-- 
\    Vincent Manis <manis@cs.ubc.ca>      "There is no law that vulgarity and
 \   Computer Science, Langara College     literary excellence cannot coexist."
 /\  100 W. 49th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada (604) 324-5205  -- A. Trevor Hodge
/  \ Co-author of ``The Schematics of Computation'', Prentice-Hall, Jan 1994
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: keskar@picone.math.purdue.edu (Keskar Pradipkumar H.)
Subject: Re: How do I do semidirect products in LaTeX?
Reply-To: keskar@picone.math.purdue.edu (Keskar Pradipkumar H.)
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 18:51:32 GMT

Try $\rtimes$

With best regards.
From: "Mehta, Shailendra" <mehta@kc235-2.mgmt.purdue.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Footnote in title page
Date: 12 Jan 1993 14:18:41 U
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

I am using the LaTeX command \thanks in the titlepage of my document. Instead
of getting a star or other such symbol as shown in the LaTeX manual on page
164, I get an annoying numbered footnote on the title page. Is there a way to
rectify this ? The LaTeX manual does not seem to help.

I would appreciate any suggestions.

Shailendra Raj Mehta
Purdue University
mehta@zeus.mgmt.purdue.edu
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: gross@stimpy.ame.nd.edu (George B. Ross)
Subject: problems using fancybox.sty
Keywords: fancybox.sty
Reply-To: gross@stimpy.ame.nd.edu
Organization: University of Notre Dame
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 19:27:09 GMT

Hello...I am in dire need of some help with a LaTeX problem.
I have downloaded the style file "fancybox.sty" and placed it
in the proper directory.  I was able to create the documentation
dvi file successfully (which requires the use of fancybox.sty).

I have now attempted to reproduce an example boxed table that was
given in the documentation...with poor results...here is my
input file...

===== beginning of input file simple_table.tex ======
\documentstyle[12pt]{article}
\begin{document}
\input fancybox.sty
\begin{table}[h]
  \begin{center}
    \fbox{%
      \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
        \begin{center}
          \begin{tabular}{rl}
             foo & bar
          \end{tabular}
        \end{center}
        \caption{A boxed table}
      \end{minipage}}
    \end{center}
\end{table}
\end{document}
============= end of input file =========
..and here are the results of compiling...

stimpy% latex simple_table.tex
This is CTeX, NeXT Version 3.141
(simple_table.tex
LaTeX Version 2.09 <25 March 1992>
(/usr/lib/tex/inputs/article.sty
Standard Document Style `article' <14 Jan 92>.
(/usr/lib/tex/inputs/art12.sty)) (simple_table.aux)
(/usr/lib/tex/inputs/fancybox.sty
Style option: `fancybox' v0.91 <92/11/25> (tvz)
! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again> 
                   i
l.49 \@i
        fundefined{@tempdimd}{\newdimen\@tempdimd}{}
? x
No pages of output.
Transcript written on simple_table.log.
stimpy% 
=======================

The error pointed to is in the style file "fancybox"
but the documentation file (which uses fancybox.sty)
compiles fine. Anyone have any ideas what I am doing wrong.

thanks in advance...george

===============  NeXT mail more than welcome  ==================
George B. Ross                                           Oh joy!
gross@stimpy.ame.nd.edu                        --Stimpson J. Cat
From: bkph@wheat-chex.ai.mit.edu (Berthold K.P. Horn)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: PC Graphics font needed
Date: 10 Jan 1993 04:58:47 GMT
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: wheat-chex.ai.mit.edu
In-reply-to: gram@aim1.aztec.co.za's message of 8 Jan 93 09:52:53 GMT

In article <gram.726486773@aim1> gram@aim1.aztec.co.za (Graham Wheeler) writes:

   Hi TeXers

   I apologise if this is in the supplementary info; I don't have a copy at the
   moment and I need this yesterday. I am looking for a non-proportional font
   of the IBM PC character set, including the line drawing characters. I have a 
   whole bunch of text screen dumps that I need to make into figures, and this
   seems like the best approach.

   Does anyone know if/where such a font is available, or have other suggestions
   about how to do these figures? 

A frequently asked question.  Use Adobe PrestigeElite or LetterGothic.
It has all the characters in IBM OEM encoding.  OR used IBMExtended
from Impramatur Systems in Cambridge, Mass.

Berthold K.P. Horn
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
From: heller@cs.umass.edu (Robert Heller)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: Canon bubblejet dvi drivers ?
Date: 7 Jan 93 16:17:16 GMT
Organization: COINS, UMass, Amherst

In article <1993Jan2.143311.46040@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>, arritt@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes...
>> Does anyone know if there is a .dvi driver available for the Canon
>> bubblejet series printers (e.g. BJ-20, BJ-200 and the like) for use
>> under MS-DOS?
>>  
>> I have tried to make a thorough search of the various .dvi repositories
>> but haven't found anything specifically for the bubblejets.  I have 
>> seen a few .dvi drivers for Canon laser printers but suspect the
>> BJ's need something different.  Thanks for any tips.
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>> Raymond W. Arritt                     |  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy  
>> Assistant Professor                   |  University of Kansas 
>> arritt@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu             |  Lawrence, KS  66045  
>> Apr  1 12:29:21 timed[92]: THIS MACHINE IS A SLAVE
>> Apr  1 12:29:27 timed[92]: THIS MACHINE IS A CANDIDATE
>> Apr  1 12:29:31 timed[92]: This machine is master

The BJ-300/BJ-330's emulate the Epson LQ (24-pin) printers and there is a MS-DOS DVI program for that.  A .ZIP file with the .EXE file exists on several places, including Simtel-20.  I have a BJ-330 (wide carriage model), but don't run MS-DOS.  If you find source code for a DVI driver for this program I would be very interested...

		Robert Heller
InterNet:	Heller@CS.UMass.EDU
BIX:		locks.hill.bbs
FidoNet:	1:321/153 (Locks Hill BBS, Wendell, MA)
CompuServe	71450,3432
From: herong@cc.mcgill.ca (Herong Yang)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: LaTeX: How to modify eqn. labels in "eqnarray" environment?
Date: 12 Jan 93 14:31:52 GMT
Organization: Computing Centre, McGill University

I am trying to modify the equation labels by redefining the "\theequation"
command, see the attached sample tex file. But it works only in the "equation"
environment, not in the "eqnarray" environment. 

Any suggestions? 

Thank you.

Herong Yang
herong@twinkie.cc.mcgill.ca
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
\documentstyle{report}
\begin{document}
......
\appendix
\chapter{Reference}
\begin{eqnarray}
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{chapter}.\alph{equation}}
    x + y + z & = & a + b + c \\
        x + y & = & b + c     \\
            x & = & c         \\
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{equation}
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{chapter}.\alph{equation}}
 f_s' = { {\partial f} \over {\partial x} }
        { {\partial x} \over {\partial s} }
      + { {\partial f} \over {\partial y} }
        { {\partial y} \over {\partial s} }
\end{equation}
\end{document}
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: richard@serss0 (Richard A Simm)
Subject: help with XYpic
Organization: Florida International University, Miami
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 08:22:05 GMT

If I want to create the following in XYpic:
	a b c d e
	  |___|
then I typeset the following:
	a & b \xline `d/0pt[1,1] `[0,2] [0,2] & c & d & e\\


But what do I type to get:
	   ___
	  |   |
	a b c d e

Replacing `d/0pt[1,1] up above with `u/0pt[1,1] doesn't work (I get
a horizontal line).

Also, why doesn't `u[1,1] complain about (-x,-y) not existing if
the `u[1,1] is on the first line after $$\diagram (if I use \uto then
I get a complaint).

Albert		richard@serss0.fiu.edu
From: mis@aps.org (mis liaison)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: dvips and type-1 CM fonts (answers)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 14:01:52 -0500
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

We have fixed the problem with dvips and the Blue Sky type-1 fonts by
upgrading dvips to dvips v4.965 (or so . . .). Thanks again to the info-tex
crowd. Here is the low-down:

  George N. White III (Internet: GWhite@BIOnet.BIO.DFO.ca) informed me
that he was using a newer version of dvips successfully with the Y&Y type-1's.

Berthold Horn (bkph@ai.mit.edu) wrote:

>
> Also, older versions of DVIPS are unable to handle the repeated
> encoding used in the BSR CM fonts.  Because many systems cannot handle
> characters in the 0 - 31 range, these appear twice in the encoding vector.
> Which normally works fine.  Old versions of DVIPS replace T1 font
> metrics with information from the TFM file, and the TFM file knows
> nothing about the repeated encodings.
>
> There are several solutions to this latter problem, getting the latest
> version of DVIPS, or stripping out the repeated encodings from the fonts,
> or modifying dvips.pro to reverse the order in which it steps through
> the encoding.
>

  We were able to ftp and build the version of dvips now on
labrea.stanford.edu, and it works fine with the fonts we have (PC versions
of the BSR fonts).

  I looked at the fonts, and the encoding vector is in the cleartext portion
of the font. It would be simple to just delete the character encodings above 127
in the vector, as Berthold Horn suggests. (Assuming you have an editor that
won't kill files with binary data.) It seems even easier to change the
dvips prolog code (/rf in texps.pro, where the /Metrics vector is constructed
in v5.47?). This is what I would have tried if the dvips update did not work.

  Also, I may have resent the question instead of this short summary. Sorry.

  -- CHamlin, mis@aps.org
From: Wolfgang Ratzka <wolfgang.ratzka@rphs1.physik.uni-regensburg.de>
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Help with REVTEX?
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 93 11:17:27 +0100
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

   I received REVTEX from LISTSERV@SHSU. I LATEX-ed the file
   MANINTRO.TEX without any problems. Although I have computer modern
   fonts on my PC, I am unable to view or print the DVI file. It cannot
   find the correct PIXEL files. I have DPI300, 329, 360, 432, 518, 622,
   746. It is looking for DPI270 which I do not have. It is also looking
   for fonts in DPI300 which I do not have - amr10.* for instance.

   Where can I find the correct PIXEL files and the correct fonts.

Seems  you  are not  missing the  fonts  but you  should  upgrade your
version of  LaTeX (A. D. 18??,  just kidding). The Almost Modern Roman
fonts are pretty much out of use nowadays.

Even with a  new version of   LaTeX you will  sometimes  encounter the
DPI270-problem. That's due to the fact that  cmcsc at  8pt  and 9pt is
not    available everywhere and   is  replaced   by   a scaled cmcsc10
(0.9x300=270).

If you have cmcsc9 and cmcsc8, all you have  to  do is edit lfonts.tex
before creating lplain.fmt. That's the way it looks at our place:

...(STUFF DELETED)...
\def\@viipt{}

\def\viiipt{\textfont\z@\egtrm
...(STUFF DELETED)...
\def\psf{\@getfont\psf\sffam\@viiipt{cmss8}}%
\def\psc{\@getfont\psc\scfam\@viiipt{cmcsc8}}%
\def\ly{\fam\lyfam\egtly}\textfont\lyfam\egtly
    \scriptfont\lyfam\sixly \scriptscriptfont\lyfam\fivly
\@setstrut \rm}

\def\@viiipt{}

\def\ixpt{\textfont\z@\ninrm
...(STUFF DELETED)...
\def\psf{\@getfont\psf\sffam\@ixpt{cmss9}}%
\def\psc{\@getfont\psc\scfam\@ixpt{cmcsc9}}%
\def\ly{\fam\lyfam\ninly}\textfont\lyfam\ninly
   \scriptfont\lyfam\sixly \scriptscriptfont\lyfam\fivly
\@setstrut \rm}

\def\@ixpt{}
...(STUFF DELETED)...


   There is also a message when I LATEX the file: Revtex message: NFSS
   not detected assuming OFSS. What does it mean?

This one is OK. It means that your LaTeX  installation  is still using
the  (standard)  Old  Font Selection  Scheme.    There is a   New Font
Selection Scheme for LaTeX, that   is more flexible, as it   addresses
fonts  via their  attributes (boldness,   italicity etc.). This  makes
adding  new fonts easier  and is  used by   AMSLaTeX to integrate  the
AMSFonts. If REVTeX  detects  that NFSS is  not present, it replicates
part of its functionality by macros of its own.

					 		Wolfgang Ratzka
      ___	-------------------------------------------------------
|    | :-)	X400: ratzka@rphs1.physik.uni-regensburg.dbp.de
| /\ |  \	      ratzka@vax1.rz.uni-regensburg.dbp.de
|/  \|	 \	SMTP: ratzka@rphs1.physik.uni-regensburg.de
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone:	    +49 941 943 2085
Paper mail: Wolfgang Ratzka \\ 	Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik \\
	    Lehrstuhl Prof. Weise \\ Universit\"at Regensburg \\
	    W-8400 Regensburg \\ GERMANY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Daniel H. Luecking" <DL24794%UAFSYSB.BITNET@SHSU.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Amspell
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 93 12:16:38 CST
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

[First of all let me apologize if the following has been discussed to death,
but my mailer has inadvertantly  "set info-tex NOMAIL"  and then my
editor/mailer developed glitches that conspired to prevent me from correcting
that. (Apologies also for sending a message to info-tex that should have
gone to listserv; I was too frustrated to think straight.)]

There has been a bit of discussion on c.t.t. about spell checkers for TeX
under msdos and amspell has been one of those recommended. I have just started
using amspell and find it on the whole useful, but I find it gets confused
by a couple of situations. Both of these render it of considerably less use
than it might otherwise be. With the /t switch it is supposed to ignore
anything between pairs of $'s  and  $$'s  and between \[  and \]  pairs.
Moreover it is supposed to ignore any word beginning with a backslash.
However, in the following example (a common construction recommended by DEK)
$$ <math> \hbox{<text> $\ds <math> $ ... } ... $$
it flagged  "ds" as a possible misspelling. This should have been ignored
under three different criteria. (I carefully checked the file for balanced
use of $'s and $$'s, thinking that might be the trouble.)

I use plain TeX and define \[ and \] for my own purposes (as variable size
delimiters, always balanced). They occur inside math mode and cause amspell
to get out of sync, so that what is outside math mode does not always get
checked. (I tested this with a planted misspelling.)

These two problems cause me to run amspell without the /t switch and so it
flags most control words and sequences of letters in math. This would not
be terrible (the control words can be added to a dictionary) except that
the backslash is not treated as part of the word. Thus a dictionary entry
for "rm" means the mistyping of "rm" for "em" (an easy typo for me)
would not be flagged.

The manual is rather limited, so I would like to ask if anyone knows a
remedy. (That is, at minimum, a way to prevent the first error seemingly
caused by nested math modes. Or, when the /t switch is omitted, a way to
get it to treat "\rm " as a complete word distinct from " rm ".)

Dan Luecking
From: kuku@acds.physik.rwth-aachen.de (Christoph Kukulies)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: xdvi
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 01:23:38 GMT
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

I spent some hours to install xdvi on my 386BSD system. Compiling
was no problem but setting it
up correctly so that fonts are found is a hell hack.

I'm running gs and dvips, so the gftopk mimic is already there.
I tried Makefile with MAKEPK and USE_PK. All I get is that
gftopk tells me the font is already there but font_open()
always returns as if the font was not found.

Could anyone give me some help in setting it up correctly?

--Chris
From: chen@concorde.ilog.fr (Jean-Michel Chen)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: NFSS installation
Date: 8 Jan 93 17:09:51 GMT
Organization: ILOG S.A., France

I need help about New Font Selection Scheme installation.
Please answer by e-mail.
Thanks in advance.

Jean-Michel Chen
chen@ilog.fr
From: dd@doc.ic.ac.uk (Demetrius Dracopoulos)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: two-column, one column mixing in Latex
Date: 7 Jan 93 16:56:29 GMT
Organization: Department of Computing, Imperial College, University of London, UK.
NNTP-Posting-Host: swan.doc.ic.ac.uk


Hello all,

I would like to know if there is a way of mixing the one-column and two-columns
formats in the same page using Latex, dvips. 

Specifically, I'm trying to put two diagrams side-by side (could do it with
twocolumn) and text in normal one column format in my Latex file.
 I'm using dvips for importing the postscript files.

Anybody who knows how I can do that?


Thanks in advance

Dimitris Dracopoulos
Dept. of Computing
Imperial College
London
From: "Daniel H. Luecking" <DL24794%UAFSYSB.BITNET@SHSU.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: what use is a scaled point?
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 93 16:57:13 CST
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List


> In article <1993Jan5.143540.15048@wraxall.inmos.co.uk>,
> des@inmos.co.uk (David Shepherd) writes:
> > 1sp *is* useful sometimes when you need something to be different from
> > 0pt but not visibly so! i.e. giving a font a slant of 1sp makes
> > LaTeX think that it is an italic font when using \em - this can
> > sometimes be useful.
>
> How so?  LaTeX doesn't really care what the actual font is that \em
> uses.  `Giving a font a slant' requires running off a special version
> of the font using Metafont.  If you don't want that font to actually
> look different, why not just \let\em\relax ?
>
> --
> Paul Neubauer   00prneubauer@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu  00prneubauer@bsuvax1.BITNET
>                 00prneubauer@bsu-ucs.UUCP       neubauer@bsu-cs.UUCP
You can give a font a slant without running metafont. There is a
\fontdimen parameter (I forget which one) which gives the slant
per point. This is probably what LaTeX looks at to determine
whether \em means \it or \rm. You can change this parameter in
the .tex file. If you do this to one font (call it \tenrm) then
\em will mean the following: use roman if the current font is
slanted or \tenrm and use italic if the current font is
unslanted but not \tenrm. This is considerably different than
\relax!

The font in this example undergoes no change (not even a
nonvisible one), but the \fontdimen parameters are used for
positioning, etc. A slant per point of 1sp would have virtually
no positioning effect. However, all commands that test the slant
of a font might be radically distorted in their effects.

Dan Luecking
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: des@inmos.co.uk (David Shepherd)
Subject: Re: what use is a scaled point?
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 18:23:45 GMT

In article <9988996@MVB.SAIC.COM>, DL24794%UAFSYSB.BITNET@SHSU.edu (Daniel H. Luecking) writes:
> 
>> In article <1993Jan5.143540.15048@wraxall.inmos.co.uk>,
>> des@inmos.co.uk (David Shepherd) writes:
>> > 1sp *is* useful sometimes when you need something to be different from
>> > 0pt but not visibly so! i.e. giving a font a slant of 1sp makes
>> > LaTeX think that it is an italic font when using \em - this can
>> > sometimes be useful.
>>
>> How so?  LaTeX doesn't really care what the actual font is that \em
>> uses.  `Giving a font a slant' requires running off a special version
>> of the font using Metafont.  If you don't want that font to actually
>> look different, why not just \let\em\relax ?

\em uses one of the font parameters to determine if the font is
slanted to decide whether to switch to \rm or \it. In the setup
here we are using a PostScriptized version of LaTeX and the .tfm files,
which I assume are generated from .afm files, all have that parameter
set to 0 - hence I add 1sp to it for all the italic PostScript fonts.
In this way \em will notice that times-roman-italic is a slanted font
and so switch to times-roman rather than the original behaviour
of deciding times-roman-italic was unslanted so it emphasised by switching
to times-romam-italic - i.e. not very emphatic!


--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
david shepherd: des@inmos.co.uk                     tel: 0454-616616 x 625
                inmos ltd, 1000 aztec west, almondsbury, bristol, bs12 4sq
                New Year Resolution for 1993: Start using capital letters.
From: mis@aps.org (mis liaison)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: dvip
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 09:01:14 -0500
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List