HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bhoughto@sedona.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Re: No Sir, Nick didn't like it
Date: 6 Oct 92 00:51:40 GMT
Organization: Intel Corp., Chandler, Arizona

In article <ahn-031092150016@branford-college-node.net.yale.edu> ahn@pop.cis.yale.edu (Eugene R. Ahn) writes:
>R&S are marooned on this planet and they radio "Star Command" for help. The
>only thing they say get is "No Sir, I didn't like it." and "Ah, Christ!"
                                                                 ^^^^^^

That's "cripes."

				--Blair
				  "Roger here."
From: elainel@cco.caltech.edu (Elaine E. Lindelef)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: don't threaten sponsors!
Date: 27 Sep 1992 05:11:27 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu

Whatever you do, please do not write the sponsors of Ren & Stimpy to complain
about John K's dismissal! By sponsoring the show, they have brought
a wonderfully bizarre show into our homes. They have nothing to do with
Nickelodeon's actions, and indeed have not had a chance to respond even if
they wanted to.

If the sponsors feel threatened, they will withdraw support for Ren & Stimpy
no matter what Nick does, because they will feel exposed and threatened.
Ford doesn't (I think) buy time on R&S. Are you going to threaten to boycott
them? If you attack the sponsors, they will avoid R&S and other shows like
it, leaving TV a bland mass of nonthreatening material.

Elaine
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: donnell@barnacle.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Subject: Re: Light the fires of revolution!
Organization: none
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 01:25:06 GMT

In article <BvGF9y.MH1@nic.umass.edu> luxo@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Ian Carrier) writes:
>In article <732qRB3w165w@halcyon.com> Buck Godot <bgodot@halcyon.com> writes:
>>
>> I'm gonna print up a flyer... and make HUNDREDS of copies (cheap ones), 
>>and post them throughout the seattle east-south side, for a call to 
>>action, and people to write letters to MTV/Nick... bold letters at the 
>>top "REN & STIMPY" to catch any fans eye, followed by the word 
>>"CENSORSHIP" then the deatails, along with MTV's address...
>> 
>>    if everyone here did the same in their area... imagine the 
>>responce... Nick studios FLOODED with post cards branded "SAVE REN AND 
>>STIMPY!"... I like that idea...
>>
>
>does anyone know the address of nick's programming department? (or whatever 
>address would be an appropriate place to mail complaints)  if so, please post
>it.
>
>-luxo-

here is where I sent mine:

Nickelodeon Headquarters
1515 Broadway
New York, New York 10036

(212)-258-7500

Keep those cards and letter coming!

					--Judex--

Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy,alt.fan.ren-and-stimpy
From: jym@mica.berkeley.edu (Jym Dyer)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Scuttlebutt from Billy West
Date: 29 Sep 92 21:12:22
Organization: The Naughty Peahen Party Line
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: plucky@ais.org's message of 25 Sep 92 14:14:52 GMT

> If John K. can't get episodes done on a schedule HE agreed
> to, and if R&S viewership takes a hit when people can't sit
> through an eighth viewing of "The Littlest Giant", then Nick's
> move to save R&S's viability seems entirely appropriate.

=+= Billy West was on a radio show today.  He intimated that
the *real* problem was creative/censorship issues.  In fact,
the lateness of the episodes is a function of these issues
(which, when you think about it, should be obvious).

> if Kricfalusi can't bake the cake, he should get out of
> the bathroom.

=+= How ridiculous.  Kricfalusi is the creative force here.
Creativity doesn't always arrive on schedule.  Ren & Stimpy
without John K. won't be worth watching; frankly, I'd rather
sit through eighty viewings of "The Littlest Giant" than
see syndicated hackwork.

=+= It's like running _Pogo_ without Walt Kelly -- or _Popeye_
without E.C. Segar.  (In fact, the current _Popeye_ is doubly
pathetic, as it's trying to merge an imitation of Segar with
an imitation of Bobby London (himself an imitator of George
Herriman).)

=+= It would be like running _The_Simpsons_ without Matt
Groening.  The "product" is there, but the soul is not.   .-.  .-.
    <_Jym_>                                              /  / /  /
  |\/\/\/|                                              /  / /  /
::|      |::: Jym Dyer ::::::: jym@mica.berkeley.edu ::/  / /  /::
::|  (o)(o):::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::(o)(o)  /:::
::C      _):::: Annoying Republicans since 1960 :::::O___    /::::
:::| `-__|::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::UUUo  (:::::
__
I'll tell you one person who doesn't think we've wasted our
money on $600 toilet seats --- Saddam Hussein.
    -- Vice President Dan Quayle.
From: szemkusmarkw@bvc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Re: R&S Comeek boook
Date: 4 Oct 92 17:39:07 GMT
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA


	Where can I get the comeek book at?

		Thanks, 

		  The keeper of the cheese
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: vagrant@vpnet.chi.il.us (Guy Umbright)
Subject: Who got booted by Nick?
Summary: Who got fired from R&S by Nick??
Keywords: Nick, fired
Organization: Vpnet - Free Usenet access
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 18:12:04 GMT

I just caught the end of a story on the radio about someone
getting booted by Nick because of the delays... Tell me more...
-- 
: vagrant@vpnet.chi.il.us  :  A man said to the universe:     : Stephen    :
: or vagrant@holonet.net   :    "Sir, I exist!"               : Crane      :
:                          :  "The fact has not created in me : 1899       :
:                          :   a sense of obligation."        :            :
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: ferguson@uinpla.npl.uiuc.edu (Bill Ferguson)
Subject: Gritty Kitty Litter Poem Contest Deadline is TODAY!!!
Reply-To: ferguson@uinpla.npl.uiuc.edu (Bill Ferguson)
Organization: Nuclear Physics Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 19:19:23 GMT

My wife just back from LA and she brought back with her a 1993 Ren and Stimpy
calendar. I quickly checked to see if my birthday coincided with the birthday
of Mr. Horse, but no luck. I also noticed that September 28 is the deadline
for submitting your Gritty Kitty Litter poems. I think this contest must be an
annual thing since Stimpy won last year and they have the deadline for next 
year already set. Get your FEDEX envelopes ready and remember that the poem
must use 47,000,000 words or less. At the same time you may want to pressure
Gritty Kitty Litter into interceding upon your behalf in the Nickelodeon/John K.
dispute. I'm not confusing reality with fantasy, am I? There not puppets...
They are not made of wax... It is not I who am crazy!!!Stays crunchy, even in
milk...

Your Punching Bag,

Bill "You lousy bum" Ferguson
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: donnell@squid.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Subject: Re: wasted away again in
Organization: none
Distribution: alt
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 15:49:51 GMT

In article <1992Sep23.173635.18098@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> slamb@milp.jsc.nasa.gov (Sean Lamb) writes:
>In article <1992Sep22.162407.10925@ryn.mro4.dec.com>, tang@akofin.enet.dec.com (Gabe Tang) writes:
>|> 
>|> re: "eric (the alf-a-bee) walker" ....
>|> > 
>|> >     It is entirely possible that Nickelodeon may be looking for a new,
>|> >     more reliable studio to do "Ren & Stimpy."  They may be looking for
>|> >     one right now.
>|> 
>|> 	.....maybe 2 more........
>
>I suspect that R&S belong to John K., and that Nick couldn't just get
>a "new ... studio to do R&S".
>
>I'll have to look at this weeks' episodes and see who has the copyright.
>I doubt if it's 100% the property of Nick.
>
>(really neat .sig compressed to save 
>	bandwidth) --------------------> `
>Sean Lamb (slamb@milp.jsc.nasa.gov)
> 

John K. creat RNS. Nick bought all rights to the characters. That was 
mentioned in all the articles so far. All my RNS merchandise bears a Nick
logo, and no mention of Spumco. They can, and probably will, try to goto
someone else.

					--Judex--
From: bw462@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bucky Whaley)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Re: Kricfalusi NOT fired
Date: 5 Oct 92 22:14:43 GMT
Reply-To: bw462@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bucky Whaley)
Organization: The Space Cadet Publishing House
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, kuchar@buast7.bu.edu (Tom Kuchar) says:

>An article in today's (5 Oct) Boston Globe reports that Nick issued a
>statement last week saying that John K. "had not been let go, but will
>act as the show's creative consultant. Day-today responsibilities will
>rest with Bob Camp."
>
>Bronwyn McElroy, Nick program publicity manager is quoted: "We've
>reorganized the production responsibilites. This move alleviates
>John's production constraints."
>
>
>To me, these statements are laden with euphemisms. 

Not to mention a veritable plethora of mandibles.

-- 
Bucky Whaley                          It's funny because it's true.
bw462@cleveland.freenet.edu         - Fat Tony, "Bart the Murderer"
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: paranoid@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Brett Patrick Schuster)
Subject: Re: Why is Nick showing R&S in the first place?!
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 17:10:07 GMT

sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter) writes:

>barth@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (barth.richards) writes:


>>In article <Bv5xon.Atn@news.cso.uiuc.edu> sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter) writes:

>>>I dunno.  Nick has a whole slew of cartoon shows, none of which have any
>>>apparent problems with cranking out new episodes on time.  I'm inclined to
>>>take Nick's side on the issue of John K. being late with the cartoons.

>>Oh *please*!  Comparing Doug or Rugrats to The Ren & Stimpy show is like
>>comparing Yugos to Rolls Royces!

>Granted.  But however different R&S may be from Rugrats et al., they are
>all similar in that they are owned by Nick.  Nick has a responsibility
>to its viewers to get new shows out on time--and, because he signed a
>contract, so does John K.  That may be a lousy system, and it may mean
>that the cartoons that *do* come out are lower quality than what we
>R&S fans are used to...but even so, I don't think Nick is being
>unreasonable when they come up to John K. and say, "Hey, where are those
>cartoons you agreed to make for us?"

Well, let me point out that John K. had made 4.5 shows, that is a good
percent of 13 in the time frame. NICK Chose to shelf 2 whole shows stating
that they were inapropreat(sp?). Fine but how would you react to a teacher 
ripping up your thesis, and telling you to make another one by Friday.

>Look at it this way: We all know how upset all of us on a.t.r-n-s got
>after a month of nothing but reruns, and we're not even getting any
>money off the show.  The folks at Nick, who realize that R&S is their
>flagship cartoon, must have been livid...and I, for one, don't blame
>them.

Livid for what realizing, that they have the wrong target audience!

>Ultimately, I think the blame for this mess lies with BOTH Nick and
>John K.  They both had different ideas concerning the circumstances
>under which the show should be produced, and you just can't do a show
>when you have a conflict over something as basic as that.  Overall,
>I think John K. will be better off on his own, where he doesn't have
>to get his work OKed by higher corporate powers.  But let's not dump
>all the abuse on the Nick executives.

Why? Maybe if we pummeled them hard enough, we might knock off their blinders!
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: bhoughto@sedona.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton)
Subject: Re: John K. Speaks: 9/28 L.A. Times Article (long)
Organization: Intel Corp., Chandler, Arizona
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 00:05:34 GMT

In article <aa=pj0a@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
>In article <1992Sep30.144407.2148@bvc.edu> johnsonchris@bvc.edu writes:
>>> shows fine art.  But Nickelodeon wants product."
>>  OK, everyone repeat after me.  MONEY GRUBBING SCUM.
>
>OK- repeat after me: PATHETIC WHINING FANBOY.
>
>C'mon. Do you really no want product yourself? Was this very same group not
>afire with threats of boycotts and whatnot when Nick kept showing repeats?

Yep.

John K. hisself said the main issue was dollars.  All Nick
had to do was let loose of the money and they'd have had
a gravy train for life.  If they'd made the investment
up front they'd be able to improve the process and reap
the benefits of learning-curve pricing and economies-of-
scale on the back end.  Instead, they used their magical
30-second attention-spanometer and said it makes no sense
to put money into something unless there's already a large
and growing profit.  Especially if the residuals promise
to keep Nixecutives in unwashed lederhosen well into the
54th century.

Nick's shot itself in the ass, this time.  They can go
back to slime and sucking up to the State of Florida,
and we'll live our lives as they always were.

				--Blair
				  "Did Disney screw Mickey Mouse
				   off the screen just because
				   the little guy had a work-habit
				   problem in Fantasia?"
From: hennessy@acsu.buffalo.edu (DOG BASEBALL!!!)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: The John K. Clench (was: Re: Bob Camp to Take Over R&S Production)
Date: 2 Oct 92 03:29:36 GMT
Organization: Ministry of Information, Lower Volta.


	ahh!  I see!  I FINALLY SEE!  BoB CamP is the ANTI-bOb!!!!!  I
should'a known!  well there's nothing for it but to form the SubGenius Clench
of John K, who mightily cleaved from the evil clutches of the ANTI-bOb!
Please stay tuned, as we will soon be splitting off from the Church of the
SubGenius, just as soon as we've arranged some kind of marketing ritual.


-- 
   /I\          Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke.
  /(*)\         hennessy@acsu.buffalo.edu                 
 /IIIII\        "Leave EVERYTHING to ME!" - Powdered Toast Man       
/IIIIIII\       Happiness is a warm gun.
Xref: sparky alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy:3224 alt.fan.ren-and-stimpy:217
From: sean@curry1.austin.ibm.com
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Re: John K. Speaks: 9/28 L.A. Times Article (long)
Date: 2 Oct 92 22:04:58 GMT
Reply-To: curry@ausvmv.vnet.ibm.com
Organization: IBM Austin, TX


In article <1992Oct2.000534.17785@ichips.intel.com>,
bhoughto@sedona.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
|> In article <aa=pj0a@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
|> >In article <1992Sep30.144407.2148@bvc.edu> johnsonchris@bvc.edu writes:
|> >>> shows fine art.  But Nickelodeon wants product."
|> >>  OK, everyone repeat after me.  MONEY GRUBBING SCUM.
|> >
|> >OK- repeat after me: PATHETIC WHINING FANBOY.
|> >
|> >C'mon. Do you really no want product yourself? Was this very same group not
|> >afire with threats of boycotts and whatnot when Nick kept showing repeats?
|> 
|> Yep.
|> 
|> John K. hisself said the main issue was dollars.  All Nick
                            ^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^ $$$$$$$
|> had to do was let loose of the money and they'd have had
|> a gravy train for life.  If they'd made the investment
|> up front they'd be able to improve the process and reap
|> the benefits of learning-curve pricing and economies-of-
|> scale on the back end.  Instead, they used their magical
|> 30-second attention-spanometer and said it makes no sense
|> to put money into something unless there's already a large
|> and growing profit.  Especially if the residuals promise
|> to keep Nixecutives in unwashed lederhosen well into the
|> 54th century.
|> 
|> Nick's shot itself in the ass, this time.  They can go
|> back to slime and sucking up to the State of Florida,
|> and we'll live our lives as they always were.
|> 
|> 				--Blair

I just spoke to a friend of mine who does free-lance artistic type of 
stuff in Orlando (home of Nick / Univ. studios) and he said Nick is 
ticking off all types because they are sooooo tight with money right
now.  It seems that Nick is not doing all that well, spent a lot of 
$$$ on some things up front and not getting a big enough return to 
keep the higher-ups happy.  They are desperate to save cash wherever
they can to stay afloat.  (if you can believe that...)  Anyway,
I find it a true shame that they had to find RNS to be a budget cut.
Oh well, maybe they'll sell of the rights to RNS to raise capital, and
someone who understands artistic genius can't be rushed will pick it
up and nurture it the way it ought to be.

Sean Curry
curry@ausvmv.vnet.ibm.com
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy,ndhecn.ramble
From: barth@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (barth.richards)
Subject: Re: PLEASE send a letter to Nickelodeon!  (like this one, perhaps)
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 17:48:22 GMT


By all means, send lots of nasty letters to Nickelodeon, but please,
PLEASE, do not send form letters.  Form letters come off looking like some
kind of plot by a small, vocal minority.  Individually written letters are
the most effective course of action when expressing your displeasure with
someone's actions.

-- 
88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
88  Barth Richards                   "Language is a virus from outer space."  88
88  att!ihlpf!barth                            - William S. Burroughs         88
88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: mckelvey@fafnir.com (James W. McKelvey)
Subject: Re: John K. Speaks: 9/28 L.A. Times Article (long)
Reply-To: mckelvey@fafnir.com
Organization: Fafnir Software, Saugus, CA, USA
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 06:27:34 GMT

>   I believe that this quote is at the heart of why people tend to *hate*
> business executives.  All that they see is $$$$$$$$ (dollar signs...)
> 
Well, they're paid by the stockholders to do that.  Which doesn't, I realize,  
answer your objection.

But even if dollar signs are their goal, they should be looking to the total  
amount instead of the short term amount.  If people like R&S the way it is,  
they should be finding a place for R & S, rather than trying to tone it down to  
fit the current place.  I mean, if they think it is too racy for the little  
kiddies, then show it at 10PM.  Or 11PM!  Or banish it to MTV!  Viacom has many  
options short of emasculating the show.

-- 
A man should not strive to eliminate his complexes, but to get in
accord with them; they are legitimately what directs his conduct
in the world. - Sigmund Freud
Jim McKelvey                      mckelvey@fafnir.com
From: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: ren & stimpy changes
Date: 26 Sep 92 13:44:03 EST
Reply-To: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Distribution: alt
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

Msg#:24620 *Fidonet Cartoons*
09-23-92 12:08:00
From: SIDNEY ADAMS
  To: ALL
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 12263 (REN & STIMPY)

Here's a news item that might interest you all.  The entire staff of Ren &
Stimpy including creator John Kricfalusi has been fired from the show.
Nickelodeon closed their studio down and even changed the locks on the door so
John K. couldn't get in.
     Nick was upset because John has spent so much money and has delivered so
few episodes of the show this year.  He was originally contracted to do 26 this
year.  He later announced he would only deliver 13.  At the rate he is going,
he would only deliver six.
     Nick was also upset because the episodes he was delivering did not match
what they had approved.  John was doing his own trick of having a storyboard
drawn of the cartoon and then approved as final by the network, then he would
add a lot of sick gags and have the show animated, believing there was nothing
they could once the show was animated but air it.  Nick has already thrown two
episodes of Ren & Stimpy away and as they look at the real storyboards (the
ones John never showed them) they see that upcoming episodes are full of gags
too gross to air and some that are probably libelous.
   At the moment, no one knows what will happen with future episodes.  Nick
is said to be looking for a new studio to take over and make new episodes and
fix the ones John K. had in the works. Some of John's employees have offered to
fix them without his involvement and to make new ones, promising not to
double-cross Nick by showing them one storyboard and then animating another.
There will probably be lots of lawsuits.

--- DB 1.38/004485
 * Origin: The Diamond Bar BBS - 714-923-1031 - Ontario, CA (1:207/101)

     To send Email to Sidney Adams, address it to:

          sidney.adams@f207.n101.z1.fidonet.org

     I'm pretty sure that this is the correct address.  But JUST in case
     it isn't, and you get an error message, you might want to give
     sidney.adams@f101.n207.z1.fidonet.org a try.  Try the first address
     first, as it SHOULD be the right one.
---
  SLMR 2.1a  Netmail Address: modemac@f230.n101.z1.fidonet.org
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA
From: edwardp@cs.umb.edu (Edward P. Piecewicz)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Re: Nick nixes Kricfalusi
Keywords: Nickelodeon Kricfalusi fired
Date: 26 Sep 92 18:40:44 GMT
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Boston, Dept of Math and CS



John K. was fired???

-- 
Internet:  edwardp@cs.umb.edu                                  - guest user -
Member and Activist:  The Boston Computer Society
From: Bucky.Whaley@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Bucky Whaley)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Re: Blah
Date: 27 Sep 92 03:30:43 GMT
Organization: Friends of Stinky Wizzleteats

kenh@leps5.phys.psu.edu (Ken Hornstein) writes:
>How depressing.  "Big House Blues" and "In the Army" again.


That's "Butchered Big House Blues."
 
 - Boeky, continuing to mutate...

 
Don't you know disclaimers will ruin your MIND?!?
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: scl7375@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Subject: LOG,LOG,LOG
Reply-To: scl7375@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 17:28:53 GMT

Does anyone kow the words to the tune log,log,log, everyone loves a log?? if you do e-mail them to me i can't figure them out. 
				Thanx
				Liddlem
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: bwatson@nyx.cs.du.edu (bruce watson)
Subject: Re: Re-runs are our FRIENDS
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 19:04:26 GMT

I was late getting to r&s so I'm seeing many of these for the first time.
...And if they are sooooo goooood (and they are!) we would want to see
them over and over and over again. That's why we tape them, no?

--
Bruce Watson  wats@nyx.cs.du.edu  Toy Cows, Toy Cows in Africa, Toy Cows
From: krusebrianke@bvc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: NEED TO BUY R&S VCR TAPES!!!
Date: 6 Oct 92 20:23:36 CDT
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA

NEED R&S VCR TAPES PLEASE!!! WILL PAY ALL COSTS!



BRIAN KRUSE
610 WEST 4TH STREET
BOX 2393
STORM LAKE, IOWA 50588
(712) 749-3451