HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tensmekl@infonode.ingr.com (Kermit Tensmeyer)
Subject: Re: Joke for you 10 percenters
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:33:24 GMT

In article <BzAIDt.A3E@willamette.edu> dreese@willamette.edu (Daniel L. Reese) writes:
>>It took the British three weeks to deploy troops into the Falklands. 
>>The U.S. had troops in staging in Saudi Arabia within 48 hours of the
>>invasion of Kuwait.  By the time you limeys get your sorry assed army in
>>motion, America has already done the job and gotten the glory.
>>
>That's because the US gov't made protection treaties with the Saudis as
>really as 1945.  The reason the U.S troops were in Saudi Arabia in 48 hrs
>was because they had bases waiting for them.

Prior to WWII the Middle East was Owned by the Brits, because of incomptent
management, the brits are no longer welcome in the Area. Remember the border
between Iraq, Iran, and Kuwait was determinded by British idiots, not
just American idiots.  The Saudis had been trained by the Brits, who decided
based on their expieriece with British Bussiness managment and British
miltary expertise, that even French Frogs would be better than Limey Adminstrators.




-- 
         Kermit Tensmeyer                         | Intergraph Corporation
   klt@kt8127.b23a.ingr.com                       | Deep in Dixie
Newsgroups: alt.tasteless.jokes,alt.flame
From: rjr004@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Joke for you 10 percenters
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 22:24:20 GMT

In article <Bz1EH7.Cn4@cck.coventry.ac.uk>, csg188@cch.coventry.ac.uk (MR X) writes:
> Yep! Another great American war.... SOMALIA ! 
>  Lets see what each side has...
> 
> America
> ~~~~~~~
> Troops:-
>    	1,800 U.S.Marines   In 1st wave to secure Baideo Airport & Mogadishu
> 	      port.
>        16,000 Marines from Camp Pendleton, California.
>       +10,000 Infantry from Fort Drum, New York.
>       Total=28,000 troops.
> 
> Combat Equipment:-
> 	C130 Transport planes + C141 Starlifters.
> 	AH1 Cobra attack Helicopter(armed with guns,missiles + rockets)
> 	LCAC Hovercraft (46 knots top speed, 80 ton cargo capability)
> 	CH46 Sea Knight (carrying 25 troops)
> 	CH53E Super Stallion (16 tons or 56 troops)
> 	MV Jack Lummus supply ship (carrying 700 vehicles including 7 miai
> 	   abrams tanks, 27 Amphibious assault vehicles, 26 light armoured
> 	   vehicles.
> 
> War ships:-
> 	USS Rushmore(dock landing ship)
> 	USS Ranger (aircraft carrier)
> 	USS Tripoli(Amphibious assault ship)
> 	USSJuneau (transport dock ship)
> 
> Somalia
> ~~~~~~~
> 
>    2 part time soldiers who work alternate weekends (one of them blind)
>    1 gun
>    0 bullets (although they hope to get one by next Wednesday)
>    1 vicious guide dog (belonging to the blind soldier)
>      rumoured to give a nasty bite !


Where the fuck did you get your figures for this--some genius British tabloid?
  


> 
>  Well, guys ! - You have a tough fight on your hands here !
>    Let's hope you don't get called up !
> 
>  Yep! The free world can sure rest easy, knowing that AMERICA will protect it
>  against "evil" countries like Somalia.....
> 
>  ....I mean, come off it... Somalia!?!... Where the fuck is it ?....
>  ....They couldn't beat fucking Hartlepool.
> 
>  P.S Loved the way the marines secured the airport... Great work guys !
>      Keep it up !


Have you even turned on a damned "tele" in the last month?  Do you know the
goals of the operation?  Goals outlined in several U.N. resolutions (all of
which the British Ambassador voted for).  The goals clearly state the the
United States and other participating countries (e.g., France) are to establish
control so that food can be delivered.  Get a clue, there is NOT a government
in Somalia!  It is run by gangs called "Technicals", they are comparatively
well armed.  You "come off it" --Somalia is an African nation located in the
horn of Africa, inside are starving people, if your too blind and stupid to
pick up a newspaper, then fuck you.  The U.S. and the U.N. are only trying to
save peoples lives, I guess you like to watch people starve for no reason...
 

----The Doctor
From: dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (Michele Dall'Agata)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Phantom brains, King shitferbrains.
Date: 17 Dec 92 16:24:05 -0600
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <1992Dec17.131725.1@jaguar.uofs.edu>, jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
> 
> *Grow the fuck up King.  This alt.flame not alt.fairness.  The object here
> is to insult the other guy at all costs and if that means ragging on his
> country whether what you say is true or not and whether you really hate his
> country or not, that is the way of the group. 

Is it true?!? Is it this the purpouse of alt.flame?!?!? Fuck you, moron, 
you had to tell me this immediately! And I started to be polite, what a 
mistake! 

> 
> **                      *TROLL OF AMERICA*		
> 

	Michele
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: *ROFL*
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 14:06:22 GMT

liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes to
trish:
->Oh, gee!  I'm so sorry that my posts haven't been more entertaining for you.
->Maybe I'll take your statement more to heart when you start posting to
->this group on a regular basis...

your comment might carry more weight had you made it to
someone who hadn't been around alt.flame for years and
years before you appeared.
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Arsehole has no style!!!!
Date: 10 Dec 92 23:23:11 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

(Mr J S Graley) writes:
>rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>>
>>you shit suking robot picece of shit mutherfucker
>>
>
>Fuck you fucking arse shit dumb-fuck fucker twat
>
>~THE GREAT NAME

First of all, you idiot:  Rob Dobson was spouting moronic, juvenile,
concatenations of dirty words here long before you popped up like a foul
toadstool.  It is YOU who copies HIS style.

Secondly:  You are still the epitome of british stupidity.  

Thirdly:  Eat shit, gag on it, and DIE.

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN)
Subject: HAVE : GUN --- WANT : BULLETS
Organization: Ostfold College
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 02:09:57 GMT


I need 200 million bullets for my 9mm Beretta.

Reward : Total annihilation of the US continent.

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama)
Subject: Re: British Empire Loyalists
Followup-To: news.net-cops.kevin-darcy
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 05:26:10 GMT

In article <1gjkahINN2v5@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@hongkong.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>So, wise Jimmy-boy, whatever is a newbie like me supposed to do now??

Put up with being flamed by anyone who wants to flame you.  As I 
said, it's a public forum.  And of course, you're free to piss and 
moan all you want about other netters butting into "your" flames
but don't be surprised when you also get flamed for whining.


----------
The only conclusion that I can draw from your having posted this is that you're
worried that Kevin Darcy may actually supplant you as net.idiot.
						lefty@Apple.COM
						<55000@apple.Apple.COM>
From: dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (Michele Dall'Agata)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: JORN the Beatmaster
Date: 17 Dec 92 17:25:39 -0600
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <exuptr.478.0@exu.ericsson.se>, exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor) writes:
> In article <1992Dec17.005112.1@fnala.fnal.gov> dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (Michele Dall'Agata) writes:
> 
>>You know, moron. Life has different moments. Sometime you need to be 
>>serious, sometime you need to have fun. Both are good, if you get the goal. 
>>And I did. 
> 
> Well, isn't that *sweet*.
> 
>>Trying to think, Patrick? Take care, you can fuse your "brain"...
>>        Michele
> 
> No, Mich, that doesn't happen to everybody.  That little accident you had in 
> school was uniquely your own.
> 
yeah, you are right, I had to think about that. It can not happen to 
brainless people...

	Michele <- You see? My name is Michele, NOT Mich! Mi-che-le. Fuck off!
> 
> 
> 
>  ----------------------!!! H A P P Y   H O L I D A Y S !!!-------------------
>  ObQuotes:
>  "Ignorance and prejudice, confident their ways are best..."
>  "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
> 
>   - Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
>     exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
>     Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: thester@nyx.cs.du.edu (Uncle Fester)
Subject: Re: Complete SUCKER list ...
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 21:21:53 GMT

In article <CINDY.92Dec13185635@solan10.solan.unit.no> cindy@solan10.sola
.unit.no (Cynthia Kandolf) writes:
>Someone who calls himself "Uncle Fester" proves he belongs on the
>"Complete Sucker List" himself:
>>>Would you take a person called 'Donald Duck' seriously ? Ooops, I
>>>forgot, you're an american. (Donald does live there, right ?)
>>>
>>     He has to live here.  He couldn't live up there with a bunch
>>     of Nors, Swedes and Finns that get upset because a duck runs
>>     around without pants on and thus ban him.
>
>Is it safe to assume you also believe Swedes roam around naked on the
>streets?  Probably.  That's a MYTH, friend.  Donald Duck has never
>been banned in Norway, Sweden, or Finland.  As a matter of fact Donald
>Duck has been the most popular comic book in Norway since around 1950.
>
     Well, maybe I got that "myth" backwards then.
     Donald Duck is only that popular because he *does*
     run around without pants and it titilates you.
     I wouldn't brag about it if I were you.

>Oh.  One more thing.  We're not all blonde.  Sorry to destroy your
>illusions of the world.
>
>Yeesh.
>
     Yeah, well we already knew that you don't have to be
     a blonde to be an idiot.
     The alternate word for "bimbo" is "Norwegian" after all.

 
     Uncle Fester

--
           :      Pat Robertson's    :                             :
           : deepest thoughts:>------>                             :
           :      *     *     *      :                             :
           :  thester@nyx.cs.du.edu  :                             :
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: MERRY CHRISTMAS: ALL FLAMING ASIDE...
Date: 19 Dec 92 00:23:33 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

Well, its Christmas time again. Again I'd like to wish everyone a 
Merry Christmas and a very happy New Year. For just a moment I'd like
to set the flames aside. 
Reguardless of all of our views on subjects, we are all people on one
very big planet. Pretty obvious. Lets take time out and remember good
will toward all men(and women). 
I ask each and every one of us to honor one another. This is the season
of caring. Come next year we will return to flaming one another.

JEFF WITTY
A.K.A. THE SOLDIER OF PEACE
(Merry Christmas to all and a happy New Year)

P.S. Don't bother trying to flame me. It'll just show how retarded some
     of you can be during this holiday season.
From: kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: To plonk or not to plonk - no question.
Date: 14 Dec 92 10:52:16 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <yBy6s*jD0@prolix.apana.org.au> dac@prolix.apana.org.au (Andrew Clayton) writes:
>
> Nationality bashing is only one step up from spelling flames.
> Pull your dick out from the ergonomic chair wheels, and look at
> life from a different perspective, you petulant little shit.
> 
And who exactly, was it who threw the first punch?  As I recall,
your post was the first in a brand-spanking new thread.  I just
pointed out that nationality bashing had been done already.

Looks like you are going to have to think of somthing new to
moan about.  Unless you get a hard-on seeing posts degrading
your island.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
From: kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: I love the US of A
Date: 17 Dec 92 19:13:25 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <jorngh.203.724471081@dhhalden.no> jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN) writes:
> >>
> >> 			JAMES BENZELESKI (TROLL)
> >> 			CITIZEN, U.S.A.
> >>
> >You've got some nerve posting a name like that into alt.flame!
> >
> >No wonder you usualy hide behind your alias.
> >
> At least he hasn't a boring un-original name like Walsh,
> someone probably made it up while wa(l)shing their ass.
> 
Well how about JORN?  Maybe your dad made it up when some one told him"
"JORN GUNNAR GET YOUR FUCKIN' 'ED KICKED IN."  Maybe that's why you
spell your name in all CAPS.

> "dinga ding dang my danga long ling long"

Translation into Swedish: "Hurdy burdy burdy hurdy volvo, mork meek burrrdy."
Translation into Italian: "Please, please, please, please, lett-a me fuck you."
                           (Some one should tell them that sheep don't
                           understand Italian)

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rjr004@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: nationalized health care
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 15:44:11 GMT

 [Old stuff deleted]   
> Yes, that's true, it would disasterious for the insurance companies. But
> that's the *political* problem. Is it right to give so much money to them? 
> I know, they give jobs to the PMC people. But, isn't it a waste of money (
> and energy) anyway? You know, I care for the workers, but I do not really 
> care for companies. If they loose the money, somebody else can find a way 
> to get that money, in a more useful way. I mean, I do not like lobbies.

You are right and wrong on this point.  The political arena is the last place
to expect a rational system to be developed.  The political system is
ingeniously constructed to allow different groups to push their own interests
in the hope that the compromises that result will benefit the whole nation. 
While working in some areas, it hasn't worked in reforming a public/private
relationship as loaded with pitfalls and potential profit as our health care
system.
 
> You know, it is something crazy. In Italy many things are nationalized, in 
> USA it is true the opposite. But we do have the same problem. The 
> burocratic restructuring. Maybe (like often it happens) the truth is on the 
> middle. Anyway, what about the north of Europe countries (Sweden, Norway, 
> Finland) ? They seem to work fine in many fields, there are few poor people,
> I think that their health care systems work good too. I do not know about 
> that, but, *maybe* they found an answer. And, maybe, their answer is a *good* 
>   	Michele
         
    The Scandanavian countries' health system is not one I would like. 
Actually it sucks dick.  I would rather pay a little in health insurance, than
have 60%+ in damned taxes.  Still, I must maintain, without an unnationalized
health-care system in the U.S., global health care would suffer.


-----The Doctor

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN)
Subject: JAGDEEP - Another queer ...
Organization: Ostfold College
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 03:12:46 GMT

In article <18DEC199215443276@vill.edu> 187701458@vill.edu (JAGDEEP SAHNI) writes:
>From: 187701458@vill.edu (JAGDEEP SAHNI)
>
> <paranoia ass/arse comparisons deleted>
>
>	Whasamatter, cretin ( by self admission )?  Nonplussed, eh? 
>I didn't say that I care, dope. If I did, I would not have used 'asshole'
>to swear at you. Get it!

You used both to be sure, therefore you cared.

Later to his great shame, JAGDEEP discovers the true meaning
about my post and groanes :

>I'm sorry. At first, I thought what you meant by,
>" Ass, arse  .. who cares ? " was " Ass, arse, I don't care how it is 
>spelled ". But I realise now that you meant, " Ass, arse. I don't care 
>what you call it. Just keep them coming, I love to lick them, all
>nationalities, I love them all. Oh, oh, yes, yesss..... "

I asked you a very *simple* question about who cared about these
things and *you* replied, that makes you a fucking faggot. Don't
try towave *that* off with your nonsense comparisons. That you
didn't understand the trap isn't my fault. You stepped right into
it, knee deep.

>Yeah.....

Yeah, right !

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: JORN, Jean-Yves, and Stephen King.....
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 19:06:42 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.095314.13039@bsu-ucs> 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>Well, another day, another flame. Who first? Hmmmmmmmm?
>Mr. Jean-Yves(or what ever the fuck your name is), who can you possibly
 [witless dreck deleted]

	Jeff, I sure hope that you are not, as you claim, a military expert,
because if you are then the United States Armed Forces is in trouble.  If 
someone as immature, obtuse, and just plain ridiculous as you can really
become an expert, then our military must have all of the intelligence of
a Three Stooges sketch (not that I think that you could even follow one of
those).  To spend your life reducing other cultures to who they were beaten
by in a military conflict is just plain juvenile.  Real human beings don't
badmouth other countries on the grounds that they got "their ass kicked."
And while we're on the subject of getting one's ass kicked, you jingoistic
little fuck, I have two words for you...VIET NAM.  Do you dig it?  I mean,
let's be serious, the US military is currently scared to death of homosexuals,
how do you see them performing against hostile forces?  Get a Goddamned grip.




>
>JEFF WITTY
>A.K.A THE SOLDIER OF FORTUNE, US ARMY
>(Yes, I am a military expert, a proud soldier, and a damn great American!) 

Witty you are not.  Nor are you an expert, and the only thing you're
"damn great" at is being an ass.

Jason Basinger Linkins
   President, _The Collective_
.

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim)
Subject: Re: British Empire? No way!
 
Reply-To: etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se
Organization: Ericsson
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 10:24:41 GMT

In article 16614@itnsg1.cineca.it, marco@itnsg1.cineca.it (Marco Olivotto) writes:
>kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
>
> [Pretentious poetry deleted]
>
>		Marco,
>		an Italian quoting an Englishman.


What an egocentric little prick you are!!  You obviously think that posting some
pathetic drivel like that will make us stop and think "Oh, Marco.  You're soooo
right!".

I've haven't read such tacky bullshit in a long time.  You also seem to subscribe
to misconception that an ill-metered verse using long words makes good poetry or
song lyrics.  You're a pretentious, overbearing fuck.  I bet you wrote that shit
for your third rate teenage rock-band, didn't you?  You intellectual pygmi.

May your words get the appreciation they deserve and be discarded like soiled
lavatory paper.

Jim.
From: liz@hikita.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: British Empire Loyalists
Date: 15 Dec 1992 01:54:07 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: hikita.wpi.edu

In article <y=k284j@rpi.edu> keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) is 
bright enough to change these - I guess that's what you learn after being
in a.f. for years...:
>liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) whines:
>
>->I see we're going to flame all threads that I am in.  
>
>what the fuck do you expect when you're posting only to
>alt.flame?

Oh sorry...I guess some people feel it is their place to butt into a thread
that didn't involve them to begin with, and put in their misinformed two
cents.  Especially when the ground covered in their posts has already
been discussed/flamed.  Oh, but I have forgotten about K e n....he is
ever so repetitive, you know.  Never mind.

I just love it when the old timers have been here so long they think
anything they say will be accepted as gospel, no matter how moronic.


>i think we'll add your remark to alt.flame's list of
>cluless newbie blunders.

Yup, that's me...the 'only been here a few months' newbie....

I guess I'm still a newbie until I've been here for years and years
like you, eh Keegan?  Still flaming Kevin, are we?  What a waste of
energy.


							--Liz

--
bite me, fan boy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: to jbm14@jaguar w./ pity
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 04:14:17 GMT

In article <LAUNCE.92Dec14120358@medusa.med.utah.edu>, launce@medusa.med.utah.edu (Tri-Ungulate) writes:
> Yeah, my girlfriend when I was an high school exchange student *was* a
> dream come true.  Apparently *your* experience in with Scandanavian
> women is limited to lurid, pornographic dreams.  Your exchanges with
> Jorn underscore your lack of familiarity with that part of the world.

Oh sure. Swedish girlfriend. Good come back. Good come back. Of course. our
exchanges with yourself underscore your ability to complete prick. Why don't
you take your European-I-had-them-all tour to alt.sex.stories.for.the.impotent
ok big guy?

--The Phantom
From: liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: British Empire Loyalists
Date: 14 Dec 1992 00:45:12 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

I see we're going to flame all threads that I am in.  

In article <Bz7svv.D67@world.std.com> rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) 
writes:
>In article <1gc51rINNj34@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@realsoon.WPI.EDU 
>(PostMistress General) writes:
>>Oh gee...maybe we should nationalize things like health care, hmm?  We
>>all know how successful that is in the great country of Canada, now
>>don't we?  
>
>Very successful indeed.  Canada has a great health care system.

So successful that Canadian patients come to the US to get surgery
that would require that they wait *years* to get in Canada, and
Canadian doctors are coming to the US for better wages.

>>(If you doubt this, then we'll have to mention the fact
>>that Canadians come to the US so they don't have to wait YEARS to get
>>some kinds of surgery done.)
>
>No, that's Britain you're thinking of, dear.  You remember, the
>island directly across from France and the Netherlands in Europe.
>Canada is the large country to the north.

Um, I was aware of that, but thanks for showing that you took (and
passed) grade school geography too.  I'll stand by what I said
about the Canadian system.

>>I'm not going to deny that there aren't starving people in *lots* of
>
>How surprising -- it would certainly be line with all the other
>garbage you post.

Can you say "kill file"?  I knew you could...now, go off and learn 
a little more about Usenet, and you won't have to read my "garbage"
anymore.  There you go...*pat on head*

							--Liz

--
bite me, fan boy