HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mateyg@rpi.edu (George J Matey)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Euro-Highlander LD
Date: 13 Dec 92 17:47:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: rpi.z7h2qjd
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A750E177F0015538@stormbringer.stu.rpi.edu>
X-Xxdate: Sun, 13 Dec 92 12:47:51 GMT
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d9


Does anybody out there know where I can get thee Euro (extended)
version of Higlander on LD?? I would prefer Widescreen without
subtitles, but would settle for P&S with subtitles if that was all 
there was.  Please email any clue to mateyg@rpi.edu  Thanx!
										George
************************************************************************
George J Matey                          One lawyer with a briefcase
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute         can steal more money than
email: mateyg@rpi.edu                     a hundred men with guns.
                                                   - Mario Puzo
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: dave@imax.imax.com (Dave Martindale)
Subject: Re: Imax
Organization: Imax Corporation, Mississauga Canada
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 22:47:48 GMT

davidv@sco.COM (Uncle David) writes:
>
>speaking of IMAX movies, when i was in Las Vegas for COMDEX, i managed
>to find time to go over to Caesar's Palace and catch "Fires of Kuwait".
>now, it has been a while since i've seen an IMAX film, but it seems that
>the Caesar's screen/dome wasn't in the greatest of condition. i could
>see the individual portions of the screen that make up the whole screen.
>not really that greatest. also, from where i was sitting (as near to the
>center as i could get), it was difficult to take in the whole film. i
>don't know if this was due to the way it was shot, or presented, or both,
>but it wasn't as impressive as i would've liked. i had to keep turning
>my head up, down, left and right to take in things. i know that IMAX is
>supposed to fill your area of vision, but this just didn't seem to do
>the trick. in fact, it seemed a bit of overkill. perhaps i sat in the
>wrong place for best viewing? 

Imax Corporation makes a whole "family" of theatre systems.  IMAX is
a big, slightly-curved screen shot with normal lenses.  OMNIMAX uses
the same cameras and projectors, but the theatre screen is a tilted
hemispherical dome and camera and projector use fisheye lenses to
cover that angle of view.  (Plus there are 3D variants of both of these,
plus some others).

Fires of Kuwait is an IMAX film, and Caesar's Palace is an OMNIMAX
theatre.  Most of the problems you had were due to the mismatch
between the two systems.  If you have to see it in an OMNIMAX theatre,
sit as close to the back as you can - but almost any seat in a real
IMAX theatre is better for viewing IMAX films (in my opinion).

>i've seen other IMAX films, including The Dream is Alive at the California
>Museum of Science and Industry (in Los Angeles), and Flyers at Great America
>(in Santa Clara), and it seemed that the presentation and theater quality
>was a *lot* better in those two places. 

Caesar's Palace has the worst screen surface I've ever seen
in a theatre.  Most theatres (IMAX and OMNIMAX both) are much better.

	Dave
From: Rob_Rosenhouse@hq-bbs.wisdom.bubble.org (Rob Rosenhouse)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: The Jungle Book
Date: 15 Dec 92 02:19:46 GMT
Organization: Headquarters BBS

In a message dated Mon 14 Dec 92 21:10, Freedman@cs.colostate.edu (keith Fr
wrote:

>they both claim 
>
>Walt Disney's The Jungle Book is availalable on Videocassette.
>
>Shock to the system or what???

 FF> I was told a couple of years ago that Disney had a list of several
 FF> movies that would NEVER be released for public sale.  Jungle Book
 FF> was on this list.  It is, however, possible for them to have changed
 FF> their minds.

I manage a video rental store, and have quite a few copies for sale of
Jungle Book.  
 
Now only if I had a dollar for every customer who has asked me for The
Little Mermaid :)
 
Rob


-- Via DLG Pro v0.995

Rob Rosenhouse
 
Rob_Rosenhouse@hq-bbs.wisdom.bubble.org
Headquarters BBS 1-201-539-4306
From: ss@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Scott Streeter)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: ALIENS
Date: 11 Dec 92 18:48:22
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609-2280
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu
In-reply-to: baldwin@frodo.colorado.edu's message of Fri, 11 Dec 1992 23:06:49 GMT

>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 1992 23:06:49 GMT, baldwin@frodo.colorado.edu (Dan "Viper" Baldwin) said:


baldwin> Is the CLV LBX version of ALIENS as grainy as the CAV LBX
baldwin> version ?

Is there one?
--
 Scott Streeter                             Visit the Star Wars Archive at
 ss@wpi.wpi.edu                             wpi.wpi.edu       130.215.24.1
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: baldwin@frodo.colorado.edu (Dan "Viper" Baldwin)
Subject: ALIENS
Organization: Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 23:06:49 GMT

	
	Is the CLV LBX version of ALIENS as grainy as the CAV LBX version ?


Thanks,
Dan Baldwin   baldwin@frodo.colorado.edu
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: rjn@FC.HP.COM (Bob Niland)
Subject: Re: Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 20:02:47 GMT
Reply-To: rjn@FC.HP.COM
Organization: Hewlett-Packard/WSY Ft.Collins,CO,USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.8 PL6]

Andy Bovingdon (bov@x.co.uk) wrote:

> Oh and also I am thinking of getting the Princess Bride on NTSC LD, but I 
> notice that there is a LBX CLV and a LBX CAV version. Which is the better 
> quality pressing, in terms of picture and sound?

Both are Criterion Collection, and are from the same video master.  As
far as I know, the only difference in quality is the normal advantage that
CAV has (at the expense of money and inconvenience).  Also, as I replied
in email to your request on the "europe-ld" mailing list...

There are three NTSC versions.  "tPB" was a 1.85:1 soft-matte widescreen
composition (although the special effects may only have been designed to
cover the 1.85:1 area).

Criterion Collection CC1194L is probably your best bet.  It is a single CLV
platter, matted 1.85:1 spherical widescreen (full image width), digital
surround sound, well chapter marked and pressed by PVI (Pioneer US).

CC1140L (which I have) is the same except for being CAV (4 sides) and
pressed by 3M.  There are no supplements, just the movie.

Nelson/Embassy 7709 is CLV, is cropped and has no digital sound or chapters.
The only reason to get the Nelson edition is if you need Closed Captioning.

Regards,                                              Hewlett-Packard
Bob Niland      Internet: rjn@FC.HP.COM               3404 East Harmony Road
                CompuServe:  71044,2124               Ft Collins CO 80525-9599

This article represents only the opinion[s] of its author, and is not an
official or unofficial position of, or statement by, the Hewlett-Packard
Company.  The text is provided for informational purposes only.  It is
supplied without warranty of any kind.
From: meg5184@hertz.njit.edu (Starman)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Imax
Date: 14 Dec 92 12:57:42 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <18419@mindlink.bc.ca> Mike_Quigley@mindlink.bc.ca (Mike Quigley) writes:
>Hey, Dave at Imax, can you answer a question? In Vancouver right now, they're
>showing this film which was a big hit at the recent Expo in Madrid. It's an
							     ^^^^^^
							    Sevilla

I'd like to know if this film is being slated for a laser disc release.
I loved it when I saw it in Sevilla at the Expo and would love to own
it. If you have any info on this, please let me know.

=============================== Mike Gaines ============================
              We come in peace, and you blatantly defy that peace!
                               We haven't fired!
                       Captain, Drop Dead Fred did it!
========================== meg5184@hertz.njit.edu ======================
                            AOL: Graphix@AOL.COM
From: bates@spica.ucsb.edu (Andrew M. Bates,,,COMS,Graduate)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Found -- Little Mermaid LD
Keywords: Little Mermaid, Disney, LD
Date: 18 Dec 92 20:35:17 GMT
Organization: University of California, Santa Barbara

In article <1992Dec14.190058.19323@exu.ericsson.se> ebupsn@ebu.ericsson.se writes:
>For those interested in Disney's "The Little Mermaid", I located a store in
>Atlanta that had several new, unopened copies.  They do mail order and
>accept credit cards.  Here are the specifics:
>
>	Title:	The Little Mermaid
>	Price:	$100


    I was selling one CAV a few months ago for list!  You guys should hav
jumped!  Anyway, if there's interest, I might be able to track down a few CLV
copies, and sell them at list plus a little bit.  Let mw know if you're
interested.

        Andy Bates.


Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: joe@smt_6.b21.ingr.com (Joe Ryburn)
Subject: Re: Technodeath
Organization: Intergraph
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 13:47:43 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.073939.12311@uhura.neoucom.edu>, wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu (William R. Cruce) writes:
|> In article <Bz4JL6.5op@fc.hp.com> rjn@FC.HP.COM writes:
|> >Stephen Jonke (jonke@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov) wrote:
|> 
|> However, we could compare two recent pressings from WEA and
|> Technidisc:  BATMAN RETURNS (WEA) and ALIEN^3 (Technidisc).  B.R. has
|> not been without some laserlock problems, but the video image (dark) is
|> superb.  A^3 has not been reported to have any laserlock (yet) but
|> the video image (also dark) is plagued with video noise.  Maybe the
|> video noise is not a problem of the video pressing plant.  Maybe it is
|> a problem somewhere earlier in the chain.  But if I were Technidisc, I
|> would be ashamed to press such crap.
|> 
	You know, the Warner plant has been on-line only a short time, 
	and I get the feeling they are really trying. My copies of Batman
	Returns and Lethal Weapon III are excellent from start to finish.
	Technidisc has been in the business far longer and hasn't learned
	anything, it seems.

|> I don't profess to believe all the hype coming out of WEA these days,
|> but at least they care enough about the laserdisc market to invite some
|> of the reviewers and editors to see their operation and explain how they
|> are trying harder.  To my knowledge Technidisc has not done this.
|> It would make for an interesting comparison.
|> 
|> 
|> -- 
|> 'Fold, Spindle, Mutilate'                              #35/37 for BRAZIL
|> 
|>     Bill Cruce, INTERNET: wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu, VOICE: 216-325-2511
|>    N.E. Ohio Univ. Coll. of Medicine, Box 95, Rootstown OH 44272-0095
Xref: sparky rec.video.releases:3842 rec.arts.disney:7334
From: baldwin@frodo.colorado.edu (Dan "Viper" Baldwin)
Subject: Re: ALIENS
Organization: Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:17:12 GMT

In article <SS.92Dec11184822@bigwpi.WPI.EDU>, ss@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Scott Streeter) writes:
|> >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 1992 23:06:49 GMT, baldwin@frodo.colorado.edu (Dan "Viper" Baldwin) said:
|> 
|> 
|> baldwin> Is the CLV LBX version of ALIENS as grainy as the CAV LBX
|> baldwin> version ?
|> 
|> Is there one?
  My Columbia House catalog lists a LBX copy of Aliens for $44.95, it is
different than the CAV version for $99.95.

So , does ANYONE out there have the CLV LBX Aliens ?????

Thanks,
Dan Baldwin
baldwin@frodo.colorado.edu
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: hofbauer@csri.toronto.edu (John Hofbauer)
Subject: Re: New "White Christmas"
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 18 Dec 92 03:29:19 GMT

> I just finished watching what was billed as a 'restored' version of
> "White Christmas" on local broadcast.  The showing had been promoted
> with spots featuring 'before' and 'after' images of the same scene.
> It was claimed that the new film would show a marked improvement for
> both color and resolution.  I was somewhat dubious, so I set up my
> LD player with a copy of the 1985 Paramount release and proceeded to
> do an A/B comparison.  The difference was surprising!  The laserdisc
> picture really did look soft and muddy next to the televised one.  The
> print was a lot scratchier, too.  The hype was true for once.
>
> [ ... stuff deleted about 3-strip technicolor ... ]
>
> This could explain the improvement in the new "White Christmas".  The
> LD release might have been transferred from an old color print or
> negative while the new version could be remastered from the original
> 3-strip film.  Does anyone know if that's the case and if so, is an
> upgraded LD release in the works?  If they did as good a job on this
> one as Criterion did on "The Adventures of Robin Hood", I'd buy it.

I bought the "widescreen" LD last February, and it looks PERFECT!!!
"White Christmas" was Paramount's first VistaVision production.
VistaVision was Paramount's answer to the widescreen craze of the
early 1950's. Unfortunatley Paramount doesn't believe in letterboxing
very much but they did this one, probably because it was the first.
I should add that perhaps one reason that Paramount doesn't believe
in letterboxing is that VistaVision has a native aspect ratio of
approximately 1.5:1, although a variety of further aspect ratios up
to 2:1 have been used ("The Searchers" is 2:1), so the black bars
are quite minimal. 

If you like "White Christmas" run out and get this disk, it's up to
Criterion standards.
From: conty@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (E. Kontei)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: TV Animation LDs (was Re: LD's of, well, stuff?)
Date: 18 Dec 92 19:01:18 GMT
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories

In article <ISBELL.92Dec15200944@panther.ai.mit.edu>, isbell@ai.mit.edu (Charles L Isbell) writes:
> Does this belong in rec.video.releases or rec.video?

It's a video software question, so it's rec.video.releases.

[Friend has an LD player]
> He knows about the ST:TOS and ST:TNG discs
> available but he is unsure (and so am I) about the availability of
> stuff like:  Voltron, Galaxy Rangers, Transformers, Thunder Cats and
> Robotech (especially Robotech).

Well, I've seen one TRANSFORMERS LD, but that's about it.  Someone else
claimed to have seen a VOLTRON LD.  No idea about THUNDERCATS, and I would
like to see an episode of GALAXY RANGERS someday, in whatever video format.

There's no ROBOTECH on LD.  Ask Streamline Pictures about a possible
LD release (currently they're releasing the series on tape).

-- 
			    E n r i q u e  C o n t y
			       Master of Science!
			      jester@ihlpm.att.com
		    Disclaimer: You're not dealing with AT&T
From: kfriedman@desire.wright.edu
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Fantasia LD on sale!
Date: 19 Dec 92 19:39:47 EST
Organization:  Wright State University 

In article <crcrpyd@lynx.unm.edu>, lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble) writes:
> judym@col.hp.com (Judy Miller) writes:
> 
> 
> I still see them from time to time -- even the Collector's box.  Most retailers
> probably had the Disney release system figured out 


Yeh...I'll bet that's the last time anyone will fall for the ol' "available
only for a limited time" sales ploy!!!

	Jay
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: freedman@cs.colostate.edu (keith freedman)
Subject: Re: The Jungle Book
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 16:48:36 GMT
Reply-To: freedman@cs.colostate.edu
Organization: Colorado State University -=- Computer Science Department

In article 16015@syma.sussex.ac.uk, markf@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Mark Foster) writes:
>they both claim 
>
>Walt Disney's The Jungle Book is availalable on Videocassette.
>
>Shock to the system or what???

I was told a couple of years ago that Disney had a list of several
movies that would NEVER be released for public sale.  Jungle Book
was on this list.  It is, however, possible for them to have changed
their minds.

---
Keith Freedman
Colorado State University
Department of Computer Science
Systems Administration
From: bates@spica.ucsb.edu (Andrew M. Bates,,,COMS,Graduate)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Release Dates for Holy Grail and Fish Called Wanda
Date: 16 Dec 92 23:57:41 GMT
Organization: University of California, Santa Barbara

In article <1gbd47INN5i7@bigboote.WPI.EDU> boisvert@wpi.WPI.EDU (Brian Richard Boisvert) writes:
>
>	Also, MGM is releasing a new A Fish Called Wanda disc with a theatrical
>trailer, chapter marks, and a new digital video transfer ($34.95).  Street date
>is MARCH 30th.

    Letterboxed??!?  Letterboxed??!! Letterboxed!?!?


        Andy Bates.

Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: ECZ5ACK@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU (Andy Kohler)
Subject: Beyond the Mind's Eye - why CLV?
Reply-To: ecz5ack@mvs.oac.ucla.edu
Date: 17 Dec 92 08:50:17 PST

I just bought _Beyond the Mind's Eye_ on LD, and was
unpleasantly surprised to find it was a CLV disc.  Considering
that the original _The Mind's Eye_ was CAV, and the obvious
desirability of having full frame access to the material,
does anyone know why Miramar chose to use CLV?  Is CAV recording
substantially more expensive?  I have written to Miramar to
express my opinions, but thought I might learn something here
as well. 

Thanks.

Andy Kohler <ecz5ack@mvs.oac.ucla.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: wbarnes@sura.net (Bill Barnes)
Subject: Found -- Little Mermaid & Cinderella LDs
Keywords: Little Mermaid, Disney, LD
Organization: SURAnet, College Park, MD, USA, NA, Earth, Milky Way
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 01:12:00 GMT

In the latest Sight & Sound catalog, they list Japanese imports of the
CLV versions of both "The Little Mermaid" and "Cinderella."  Since
these two suckers are out of print here in the US, I thought some of
you would be interested...  They have English on one track and
Japanese on the other (don't say which is on analog and which is on
digital, though) - no subtitles!  (Not letterboxed, near as I can
tell, but you can't have everything.)  They're listed at about 5900
yen, which will cost something over 60 bucks - not too bad considering
there's someone who wants $100 for the domestic release.

SIGHT & SOUND
1275 MAIN STREET
WALTHAM, MA 02154
PHONE: 1-617-894-8633

Have fun.
-- 
-----------------------
William Barnes		SURAnet Operations
wbarnes@sura.net	(301) 982-4600 voice  (301) 982-4605 fax
From: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: a laser christmas
Date: 19 Dec 92 20:32:58 EST
Reply-To: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

     Yesterday I picked up the laserdisc version of what may be the
greatest Christmas movie of all: A CHRISTMAS CAROL, starring Alastair
Sim as Ebenezer Scrooge.  I love this movie; every time I see it, I
start to cry.  It's one of the most heart-felt movies I know of.

     Unfortunately, the laserdisc is not worth the $30 I paid for it.
It's in mono, of course, but the quality of the print is only so-so
and the sound is occasionally muffled - especially within the first
ten minutes of the movie.  During the scene where Tiny Tim looks
enviously into a toy store and his mother calls him over, her voice
and his sound as though they were somehow electronicaly distorted, or
as if they came from a computer instead of human lips.  Fortunately,
this effect only lasts for a few seconds.
     The disc is in CLV, with no chapter stops (a sure sign that it
wasn't pressed recently), and it's released through United
Entertainment.  I'd never heard of that company before now; I'm sure
Ted Turner would have cleaned up the movie before releasing it.

     On one hand, I'm glad to own this movie on laserdisc, because
it's the best version of "A Christmas Carol" ever made - it may be
one of the best movies ever made, period.  It's certainly one of the
best family movies of all time, ranking up there with THE WIZARD OF OZ
and PINOCCHIO and E.T.  But I wish it was released on a better quality
disc.

     If you find this laserdisc in the used-disc bin of your local
store, or if it's listed in a 1/3 off sale or something, then snatch
it up - it'll be worth the price.  But don't pay full price for it.
---
  SLMR 2.1a  "Ad Nausaeum:" Commercials that make you puke.
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA

Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu (William R. Cruce)
Subject: Re: Technodeath
Organization: Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 03:58:12 GMT

In article <Bz5wo6.1qo@fc.hp.com> rjn@FC.HP.COM writes:
>William R. Cruce (wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu) wrote:
>
>> ...  The first version of A VIDEO STANDARD was from Technodisc
>
>The first edition of AVS was pressed by Disctronics (now DMI, and no longer
>in the LD biz).  I had a copy.  The currect version of AVS, which I
>presently have, is from PCA (Pioneer industrial).  There were rumors that
>some AVS copies were 3M, but I have never heard of any from Technidisc.

Bob is correct.  I was wrong. Must have gotten *disc confused with Disc* :-) 


-- 
'Fold, Spindle, Mutilate'                              #35/37 for BRAZIL

    Bill Cruce, INTERNET: wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu, VOICE: 216-325-2511
   N.E. Ohio Univ. Coll. of Medicine, Box 95, Rootstown OH 44272-0095
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: porges@beretta.camb.inmet.com (Don Porges)
Subject: Re: New releases from LDN
Keywords: LDN
Organization: Intermetrics Inc.
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:44:51 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.225207.8489@tc.fluke.COM> moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer) writes:
>
>What's THE SWORD AND THE ROSE ABOUT, anyway?
>

It's a Cinderella live-action film.  All other info is in my reference
books, not in my head right now, so sorry.
-- 
					-- Don Porges
					porges@inmet.camb.inmet.com
					..uunet!inmet!porges
From: wiehn@evax.gdc.com
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Nostalgia Archive -- Address?????????
Date: 16 Dec 92 13:49:51 GMT
Organization: General DataComm, Middlebury CT

I'm hoping someone can help me locate an address for a video company called:

          "NOSTALGIA ARCHIVE"

From what I've read they just have come out with the silent Laurel and
Hardy films on Video.  I really want to get these tapes so if anyone has an
idea where this company is or where I could order these tapes please let me
know.

Thanks.........

John Wiehn
EMAIL: WIEHN@EVAX.GDC.COM
From: meg5184@hertz.njit.edu (Starman)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Japanese Little Mermaid was Re: Where is The Little Mermaid?
Date: 11 Dec 92 18:02:58 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Dec11.004720.21492@bilver.uucp> bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion) writes:
>
>Latest Sight'n'Sound catalog lists a Japanese bilingual release
>of Little Mermaid.  It will be about $71
>
>
Keep looking! I got one for $59.xx + tax which came to something like
$62. Excellent transfer! I just got that in last week. I'm also getting
a CLV Cinderella (bilingual). The CAV with all the goodies was
subtitled. Nyah, I HATE subtitled full-screen movies. The only one I
have is Tron since you can't get it in the states and the letterboxed
copy is gone.

=============================== Mike Gaines ============================
= WHAT is your name?............................Captain Jean-Luc Picard=
= WHAT is your quest?.............................I seek the Holy Grail=
= WHAT is the average velocity of a Bird of Prey?...Romulan or Klingon?=
=                        I.....I don't know AAAAAHHHHH!                =
========================== meg5184@hertz.njit.edu ======================
                            AOL: Graphix@AOL.COM
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Monday, 14 Dec 1992 12:54:22 MST
From: <ICRTB@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Request VHS Letterbox source

If anyone knows of a good source where I can get titles in Letterbox format
please post or email me.  These must be in VHS format.


Thank you,
Rob