HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: Some fears and doubts about my sexuality
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center and Reptile Farm
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 14:55:40 GMT

In article <39116@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> jclark@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (John Clark) writes:
>In article <BvrCFB.F2s@news.larc.nasa.gov> kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov (Scott Dorsey) writes:
>+
>+Well, I remember when the Beatles were on the pop chart, but I'm probably
>+dating myself.
>
>I'm sure that it was the linkage of a blond with a nice ass and Jan
>'n Dean that I prefered them to those bozos who only wanted to hold
>hands.. I wanted dead man's curve.

Actually, Jan 'n Dean were pretty cute themselves.  However, the Beatles
didn't just want to hold hands.  In a few short years they went from
"Money, that's what I want" to "All you need is love."  But I still haven't
forgiven J&D for "Horace, the Swinging Schoolbus Driver."
--scott
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: jcarroll@bach.udel.edu (Royal J Carroll)
Subject: Re: triangles in bed (was Re: My first Triangle0
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 18:23:34 GMT

In article <1av9dfINN6dq@smaug.West.Sun.COM> lorico@boomboom.Eng.Sun.COM (Lori Cotton) writes:

>Any takers?  *blatant flirt*

Only if I get to be the hypotenuse! (I knew that Geometry course had to
come in handy sometime!) :-)

-James

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
If I could only reach you/If I could make you smile
If I could only reach you/That would really be a breakthough
-Queen, "Breakthru"=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=jcarroll@brahms.udel.edu-
From: cen@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: I am not a bisexual!!!!
Date: 8 Oct 92 04:16:05 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620


 mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd) writes:

> My favourite badge is still the simple one I have, saying "They're
> lying".  (Although I was recently given some of the *best* badges, queer
> and otherwise, recently - should I quote the neater ones?)

I'm considering getting the enamelled pin which has Bongo shouting "Lies,
Lies, Lies"... but I already have the "I swear to God I didn't do it" one.
  
> Mike, who _was_ having a bad night, trying not to make reference to
> bisexuality in the exam he's trying to set [Mike winks to Ellen and Coe,
> cliqueishly] 

<Cen listens for the sound of splashing...?>

Tanaqui
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: andreaf@bonnie.Rational.COM (Andrea Frankel)
Subject: Re: Two women please
Organization: Rational
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1992 00:41:21 GMT

This is a test, this is only a test.  Send some fluffies my way, please!

*HUGS* *RUBrubrub* *lick*
From: muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: for play
Date: 12 Oct 92 11:58:43
Organization: Natural Language Incorporated
	<MUFFY.92Oct11230100@remarque.berkeley.edu> <iw.718903857@tosser>
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: iw@tosser.Rational.COM's message of Mon, 12 Oct 1992 15:30:57 GMT

In article <iw.718903857@tosser> iw@tosser.Rational.COM (The_Devine_Dolly) writes:
>muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) writes:

>>In article <26778@castle.ed.ac.uk> mlloyd@castle.ed.ac.uk (M Lloyd) writes:
>>>Okay, a challenge.  The soc.bi self-pleasing marathon.

>>Umm...Mike?  I'm a little handicapped here - I've got repetitive motion
>>syndrome, and when I masturbate more than 5-6 times, my wrist hurts
>>quite a bit.  Can I use mechanical devices?

>Well electrical at least.  Although some of those old mechanical
>vibrators in Good Vibes are a trip.  BTW whats your
>favourite to masturbated to music.

Anything on "Stealing Fire" by Bruce Cockburn.  That's my favorite music
for *any* sex...

Muffy
--

Muffy Barkocy                               muffy@mica.berkeley.edu
~smiling girl directing traffic flow
.45 strapped over cotton print dress
marimba-brown and graceful limbs
give me a moment of loneliness~ - Bruce Cockburn
From: jcripe@garnet.berkeley.edu (Janice E. Cripe)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: National Coming Out Day
Date: 12 Oct 1992 01:09:46 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu
Summary: Janice comes out in soc.bi!

Well, here goes.  I've been reading this group for about
a month now and have enjoyed seeing what others have been
saying, but couldn't think of anything to say myself.

Since today is National Coming Out Day, I thought I'd add
myself to the long list of people I've seen demuffining
themselves recently and go ahead and post.

I hope that someday I'll actually have something useful
to post here, but for right now, I just wanted to peek
out from behind my CRT and thank you folks for some
interesting and insightful (and sometimes funny) reading.

Thanks for your time!

- Janice Cripe

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nobody Knows I'm Bisexual - seen on a T-shirt in my closet.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: iw@tosser.Rational.COM (The_Devine_Dolly)
Subject: Re: My first Triangle
Organization: Rational
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 17:33:34 GMT

nsn@ee.mu.OZ.AU (Nick Nicholas) writes:

>and hurl your Iseult statuette out the window.

Oooooh!  What did I look like?

Iseult.
From: rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Teensy Weensy Virginities
Date: 14 Oct 1992 07:17:21 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu

In article <latarra.719037371@camelot> latarra@camelot.bradley.edu (Lisa Ehren) writes:
->In <1992Oct13.020626.10802@micor.ocunix.on.ca> grinch@micor.ocunix.on.ca (Dave Ferguson) writes:
->>I was actually talking about gay virginity with my ex-boyfriend not too long
->>ago.  I figured there are four ways for a man to lose his virginity to another
->>man: anal active, anal passive, oral active and oral passive.  I suppose if
->>you're bi, there's always the fifth, i.e. vaginal.  I feel so...*accomplished*
->>now that I've lost my virginity *five* times...
->
->I take it you're not distinguishing between male and female for the anal
->active/passive and the oral active/passive.
->I personally make a difference but that's probably 'cause I've got the oral
->for one sex and not the other...

Hmm ... I suppose that means that bi's have 9 virginities? Wow ...

I'm impressed.


-- 
Roy S. Rapoport         rsr@soda.berkeley.edu          bi-bdsm@ocf.berkeley.edu
          I'm not gay but my boyfriend ... err, actually he's bi also.
DISCLAIMER:  "I meant every word of it ... but nobody else did."
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: orc@amber.uchicago.edu (David Parsons)
Subject: Re: Edinburgh Muffin Pops up in Bay Area
Organization: Ministry of Skritching
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 19:27:03 GMT

In article <2ad4c86f@ThreeL.co.uk> adc@threel.co.uk (Alan "D." Culloch) writes:
|Orc: sorry - my loss!  <skritch><skritch>  better?

   Mumble.  At least I'll be visiting the UK (again :-) in November and will
hopefully be around Edinmumble for a while.
                 __
   david parsons \/ orc@sybase.com, if you're lucky
From: muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: two men (was: two women)
Date: 14 Oct 92 21:18:49
Organization: Natural Language Incorporated
	<1bhebuINNjg@agate.berkeley.edu>
	<MUFFY.92Oct14160744@remarque.berkeley.edu>
	<1biq5jINN9c5@agate.berkeley.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: rsr@soda.berkeley.edu's message of 15 Oct 1992 03:56:35 GMT

In article <1biq5jINN9c5@agate.berkeley.edu> rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport) writes:
>In article <MUFFY.92Oct14160744@remarque.berkeley.edu> muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) writes:
>->I object to either of the two scenarios expressed above, both of which
>->boil down to women pleasing men.  I prefer groups in which *everyone*

>Well, I'm not sure what you mean by 'objecting,' since I doubt you'd picket
>our bedroom ...

Conceptual objection, as in "I wouldn't recommend it to anyone."

>I may be missing the political point here,`

*What* political point?  You're missing the point if you think there
*is* a political point, yes.

>but I suspect you may be applying
>your standards of pleasure to other people's activities ... In other words,
>you consider pleasure, within the context of the above scenario, to be
>sexual pleasure.

No, actually, I don't.  I believe that there are all sorts of pleasures,
and I have experienced many different ones, during sex and at other
times.

>I, personally, do not believe pleasure is confined to that level.

I do not, either.  What I said later in the same article (which perhaps
you missed) was that what I *also* do not believe is in sheer altruism -
getting all your pleasure indirectly, by causing pleasure to others.  I
have never seen a case where that did not turn out to be destructive to
the person being "altruistic."  Such cases may exist, but they are rare
enough that I have not seen one, so I wouldn't do it, nor recommend it.

>Some of us are just slaves/butches(according to Iseult) at heart ... let us
>have our fun, and we'll give you yours :)

I didn't/wouldn't try to take your fun, and I will get my own, thanks.

Muffy
--

Muffy Barkocy                               muffy@mica.berkeley.edu
~Weavers' fingers flying on the loom/patterns shift too fast to be
 discerned/all these years of thinking/ended up like this/in front
 of all this beauty/understanding nothing~ - Bruce Cockburn
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: orc@amber.uucp (David Parsons)
Subject: Re: Two women please
Reply-To: orc@amber.uchicago.edu
Organization: Department of Catastrophes
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 04:16:08 GMT

In article <1992Oct15.031820.11587@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> pclary@mushroom.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
|>In article <1992Oct14.124615.203108@uctvax.uct.ac.za> krgjus01@uctvax.uct.ac.za writes:
|
|<mischievous grin>
|(Dare I?  Dare I? I simply cannot resist...)

  Some articles are just too tempting not to follow up to.

|>+I have always fantasised about having sex with two lesbians at once as I
|>+think it must be the most amazing experience imaginable. 
|
|Sure if you like being ignored...  Utterly and completely ignored...

   It does make it easier to take pictures, though...

                 ____
   david parsons \??/ orc@sybase.com
                  \/
From: pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Two women (and other stuff)
Date: 15 Oct 92 09:06:08 GMT
Reply-To: pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
Organization: Laboratory for the Foundations of Computer Science, Edinburgh U

Be careful when flaming this guy.  Fantasy is a space where you can do
anything you like, so I don't see a problem with fantasies about being
in bed with two women; this guy's problem isn't his fantasies but his
attitude towards real, live women.

Group sex is definitely a good thing in my book.  So long as the
participants don't expect to be the centre of attention for more than
1/n of the time, there is a lot of fun to be had.  Read Sapphistry for
useful tips on how to make it go well, the personal dynamics are more
complex and care needs to be taken; a little advance thought wouldn't
go amiss either.

Hugs, y'all, gotta go to my Operating Systems lecture...
--
  __                                ____
\/ o\ Paul Crowley pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk \  /
/\__/ "SET ME ON FIRE!" - Big Black  \/
From: elf@halcyon.com (Elf Sternberg)
Subject: being "in love"
Originator: elf@halcyon.com
Reply-To: elf@halcyon.com (Elf Sternberg)
Organization: Pendor, UnLtd.
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 07:14:56 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.180304.21112@midway.uchicago.edu>
     h431@quads.uchicago.edu (heather e blair) writes:

>He then replied that he didn't
>see how this alleged love could compare to the "simple love" he felt for
>his wife and son.  And that made me think, has this married man never
>experienced erotic love?  Why would he call his love for his wife "simple"
>and utter it in the same breath as his love for his son?

   Probably, Heather, because he's socially conditioned to accept it.
It's kinda like the "Why are you straight" routine, only one level
deeper.  Since his life runs smoothly and since his lifestyle is upheld
by society everywhere, "loving" his family probably _is_ "simple" for
him.  

>Anyway, what I want to ask you net.people is whether you think that their
>are people who have never experienced erotic love for anybody, same or
>opposite sex?

   Ayup.  I know a few people who experience cathexis (investment of
libido, or more simply, raw lust) simply on the basis of appearance /
objectification and never consider love.

>And do you think the invocation of "love" is a good or bad technique for
>convincing the sceptical straight-person?

   Actually, I get flamed for it.  "Be serious, Elf, bisexuality and
homosexuality have nothing do with love.  Sexual orientation is about
who you fuck.  I love my friends, but I don't plan on jumping into bed
with them," is the general gist those letter go.

   Still, I try.  I _did_ start sleeping with a man because I fell in
love with someone who happened to be gay.  Did he recruit me?  I don't
think it really matters, because I _wanted_ to get into bed with him
after I was done with my mental gymnastics.

   So, yes, I use that argument, even if doesn't always work.

   Snagged Michael, Ben, and Roy with it, though... :-)

         Elf !!!
-- 
Elf Sternberg    __   |     I have looked into the abyss, and the abyss
elf@halcyon.com  \/   | has looked into me.  Neither liked what we saw.
elf@polari.online.com |                              - Brother Theodore
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd)
Subject: Re: New Group Formed!
Organization: DSO, Stanford University
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 00:19:24 GMT

woodhous@latcs2.lat.oz.au (Joe P Woodhouse) writes:
: [GREAT news of the new LaTrobe Bi-Friendly Group]
: ...
:    We have plans to follow this up with a more general Melbourne-based
: Bi-Friendly Group to service the greater community.

*guffaw*  Mind your phrasing, Joe!  Put it like that, and you'll have
people like Mr Purple Helmet (or was that Dick Head?) calling you up for
servicing ... :-)

Mike, flipping off another flippance
-- 
Mike Lloyd, B0/1 h- f- t w- c g+ k+ s m- e? |"Bloody nose and burning eyes
      Retro-hippy, music nut, bi and        | Raised in laughter to the skies"
          backrubber of devotion            |     - Bruce Cockburn
 ....."I suffer from internalized homophonophobia"....."Their, they're".....
From: rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: My first Triangle
Date: 14 Oct 1992 03:36:44 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu
Keywords: Pool cue, statuette thrown out window, bestiality, pizza

In article <9228811.22524@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> nsn@ee.mu.OZ.AU (Nick Nicholas) writes:

->Kindertotenlieder, seen Buffy the Vampire Slayer, threesomed a pizza, played
                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Ooh, tell us more! Were you in the middle? Was the pizza? Did you two ... 

*blush* 

eat it?


*grin* Sorry, Nick ... you were asking for it :).

-- 
Roy S. Rapoport          rsr@soda.berkeley.edu            bdsm@ocf.berkeley.edu
        "In my opinion, anyone who wants to can call themselves a pervert
           or a queer but slut is a compliment you have to earn." -SFJ
DISCLAIMER:  "I meant every word of it ... but nobody else did."
From: rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Teensy Weensy Virginities
Date: 13 Oct 1992 20:57:05 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Oct13.020626.10802@micor.ocunix.on.ca> grinch@micor.ocunix.on.ca (Dave Ferguson) writes:

>I was actually talking about gay virginity with my ex-boyfriend not too long
>ago.  I figured there are four ways for a man to lose his virginity to another
>man: anal active, anal passive, oral active and oral passive.  I suppose if
>you're bi, there's always the fifth, i.e. vaginal.  I feel so...*accomplished*
>now that I've lost my virginity *five* times...

*blink* *grin* *giggle* 

Umm, OK ... you mentioned 'four ways for a man to lose his virginity to
another man.'.

I'd be the first one to admit I'm clueless, so I'll bite ...

How does one give his vaginal virginity to another man? Is this something I
missed in Sex Education (i.e. Furry :) )? 


->Just my tidbit for the day...

Thanks, Dave.  It's quite a handsome tidbit, too.
-- 
Roy S. Rapoport          rsr@soda.berkeley.edu            bdsm@ocf.berkeley.edu
#include <stdio.h>
float kinsey(){int c=random()%601;return (c/100.0);}
main(){srandom(time(0));printf("And now I'm %.2f\n",kinsey());}
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: kdc5072@ultb.isc.rit.edu (K.D. Colagio)
Subject: Re: National Coming Out Day
Followup-To: soc.bi
Originator: kdc5072@ultb
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 14:16:27 GMT

Chris Novy writes:
->What's with all this "fluffy" "cuddly" hugs" stuff?  I'm very new to this
->group and to usenet.  ..Chris..
->

A Fluffy....hmm, don't really see that one much, but Furry...that is a
person who connects to furrymuck...or it could be a bear...

Cuddly, what I am <grin>...or someone else who is cuddly...

hugs...well, that is when someone wraps there arms arund you in a friendly
or intimate fashion...and sometimes progresses to other things.

Other terms that you will see are:
  Muffin, a person who just reads the news group.

  Ex-muffin, a person who posted here...like you did.

  De-muffining, the actual first post of a muffin.

All in all, this is (usually) a VERY friendly newsgroup, so come on in and
enjoy.... 

*hug*
nibble....HEY EVERYONE, this ex-muffin's GOOD!


    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    =   Kevin Colagio...student at large - Bear code?  You think I   -
    -                aka                 -   know what that is???    =
    =       KDC5072@ultb.isc.rit.edu     -    B2/4 w g++ K s- h+ r   -
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    =  "I support bondage between the parent and the child"          -
    -                   --Dan Quayle, Vice President of the USA      =
    =                          during the Vice President Debate      -
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Elizabeth Holden)
Subject: Re: Yet Another Demuffining(sp?)
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC.
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 92 20:05:58 EDT


Hi!  Hugs!  Welcome!  

Why would you want to change your name?  It's a good name....

Namaste,
Elizabeth

Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: johnf@uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu (John Flanagan)
Subject: Gay marriage case heard today
Organization: University of Hawaii, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 21:30:49 GMT

I just wanted to let people know that the gay marriage case was heard
today by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii.  I'll discuss it
later when I have more time, but the feeling I came away with is
cautious optimism.  We clearly have at least a couple of justices on
our side, and the state's case crumpled under their withering
questioning.  But you never know what will happen.  The decision
should come down in a month or two.

When I left the courtroom, the plaintiffs were surrounded by TV
cameras.  Check out the news this evening!

And, again, _tax_ _deductible_ donations for the plaintiffs' legal
fund can be sent to:

	Hawai'i Equal Rights Marriage Project
	Gay and Lesbian Community Center
	1820 University Ave.
	Honolulu, HI 96822

Checks should be made out to H.E.R.M.P.

Later,

--John
-- 
John Flanagan                          ||"Pretty boys
johnf@uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu           || with the sunshine faces
U. of Hawaii, Dept. of Physics & Astro.|| <mumble mumble>..."
2505 Correa Rd., Honolulu, HI 96822    ||   -- My Bloody Valentine
From: cen@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Yay!
Date: 11 Oct 92 00:35:53 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620


 iw@tosser.Rational.COM (The_Devine_Dolly) writes:

[Men & Women: faces]
 
> Yeah, thats a good point too.  I like chewing mens faces (yes I am an 
> ogress), but because womens faces are much softer, I don't have the
> same desire to chew their faces.

Mm. I like men with little or no stubble, but definitely do not like full
beards ... luxuriant growths around the mouth are not attractive to me, tho
subtle chin stuff can be fun. And as for chewing faces - I've found that no
man of my acquaintance objects to me running my teeth over his stubble, though
I've never actually *chewed*

Although I'm a rough, tough real sex dykey type, I don't run my teeth over
women's faces... I haven't found one yet who makes a sandpapery noise when I
do so |-)

Otherwise, my approach to kissing people is not reliant on gender. How dull |-)

Tanaqui
From: cliveg@cix.compulink.co.uk (Clive Grace)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: A message for Debbie
Date: 7 Oct 92 16:06:00 GMT
Reply-To: cliveg@cix.compulink.co.uk


Hi there Debbie, sorry I had to post onto soc.bi, but I tried mailing 
mailing you at gerbil@sunacm.pyr.swan.ac.uk and the mailer bounced it 
back - have you got another address I can post to...?

cliv

clive grace
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: iw@tosser.Rational.COM (The_Devine_Dolly)
Subject: Re: Femme/Butch in Bisexuality
Keywords: Femme Butch 
Organization: Rational
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 19:43:49 GMT

h431@ellis.uchicago.edu (heather e blair) writes:

>In article <1992Oct12.180732.1318@rational.com> iw@Rational.COM (The_Virgin_Ho) writes:

>EEEEK!  By your definition, I'm butch!  (Except occasionally I dress femme).
>But also, aren't there butches who are sexually "passive" or "receptive"?

Yeah - I guess there are.  But I have not really met any and don't know
where to fit them into my model.  Certainly they don't like display the
way femmes do.

Iseult.
From: ttk@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (the troglodyte killer)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Teensy Weensy Virginities
Date: 15 Oct 1992 18:39:39 GMT
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucscb.ucsc.edu


>Subject: Re: Teensy Weensy Virginities
>latarra@camelot.bradley.edu (Lisa Ehren) writes:
>[distinguishing between male and female]
 
>I s'pose if you distinguish between male and female, you have *four* ways to
>lose your virgingity (or give it away, as Roy prefers 8-) through oral sex.
>Of course, it's still kind of difficult for a man to be anal passive with a
>female partner, so I guess I *was* distinguishing for that one...
 
     Trust me -- it >is< quite possible for a male to be anal 
passive with a female partner.  (fun, too)
 
     (Side note:  I now be demuffined!)  :-)
 
                                                      -- TTK
B0 f- t+ w- g k s- m r- p-(++)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd)
Subject: Re: Lincoln Uni. has SOC.BI
Organization: DSO, Stanford University
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 03:56:51 GMT

rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport) writes:
: mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd) writes:
:
: ->Mike, "Me?  Treat soc.bi as religion?  Never!"
: 
: Well, if you do, then I insist on the right to worship you as a god.

Permission steadfastly refused :-)  I want that like Ciaran wants
authority .. my ego is quite fat enough, thank you very much.  I can see
it now; first this, then the RFD of alt.fan.mlloyd.barf.barf.barf ...

hugs liberally applied, with a couple of extra ones for Roy
Mike, about as much a deity as he's a pumpkin
-- 
Mike Lloyd, B0/1 h- f- t w- c g+ k+ s m- e? |"Bloody nose and burning eyes
      Retro-hippy, music nut, bi and        | Raised in laughter to the skies"
          backrubber of devotion            |     - Bruce Cockburn
 ....."I suffer from internalized homophonophobia"....."Their, they're".....
Newsgroups: soc.bi