HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hashimoto@sgi.com (Roy Hashimoto)
Subject: Referee's judgment (was DID YOU OR THE NET TOUCH WHILE BLOCKING?)
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 17:04:22 GMT

In article <1992Apr09.225127.114501@locus.com> cjkuo@locus.com (Chengi Jimmy Kuo) writes:
>Ball is ping-pong'ing across the net.  I play a ball that's just come over.
>I play it to one of our guys.  The ref blows the whistle and calls "4".  (Bad
>call.)  He said, at some point, the ball didn't go over.  Then when I try to 
>argue, he cites ref's judgment.  I don't think there's any place for "ref's 
>judgment" there.  I was asking him to ask the person on the other team who 
>directed the ball to me to verify that she was the one who hit it over.
>
>Essentially, he never saw the play and lost count but he wouldn't let me
>argue it.  I wanted to protest the game.  (He was a bad ref.)
>
>So, is "4" a ref's judgment call (no blocks involved, no area for confusion
>there)?  All I wanted was "errant whistle."

This is a referee's judgment and is not protestable.  The best you can do
is to ask the referee to confer with the down ref.  It's a dispute over the
facts, not over the rules, and the referee gets to decide what the facts
are.

A good ref should confer with the rest of the officiating team on a disputed
call, but it is improper to ask players if they committed a violation.  In
fact, the national ref that conducted my first certification class stated
that the referee should ignore admissions of faults, like touches or net
violations.  This doesn't put teams that call their own at the disadvantage
of teams that don't.  A second reason he gave was that players can be
mistaken when balls contact them through the net.

I have always accepted player admissions because the leagues and tournaments
I have played in are generally so friendly that there is strong pressure
to call your own, or are so competitive that nobody calls their own.

Roy Hashimoto
hashimoto@sgi.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
From: cjkuo@locus.com (Chengi Jimmy Kuo)
Subject: Re: DID YOU OR THE NET TOUCH WHILE BLOCKING?
Organization: Locus Computing Corporation, Los Angeles, California
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1992 22:51:27 GMT

ericding@athena.mit.edu (Eric J. Ding) writes:

>In article <1992Apr9.173313.11501@sunb10.cs.uiuc.edu>, u2417@sunc2.cs.uiuc.edu 
>(Mike Schneider) writes:
>[stuff on accidental touch during a block deleted]

>|> Then this happened during practice.  The ball bounced off the net
>|> back to the other team, and I had touched it (just a bit).  One player
>|> passed it, but someone else was saying "did you touch it" and of course
>|> I didn't say anything.  The next person just caught the ball
>|> and said "He didn't touch it."  Then *I* said "Aha!  I did touch
>|> it, and you should never let a ball go until you are absolutely
>|> sure it is dead." (or something like this).  Of course, this person
>|> that caught the ball is a friend of mine with an attitude and
>|> he got really pissed at me when this happens, which is typical
>|> of him since he hates to be wrong.
>|> 
>|> I'm just wondering...how does anyone else feel about this?
>|> 

>Well, Mike, I'm just a wanna-be setter with a so-so vertical, so you don't see
>me going up to block like a monster very often.  But nevertheless, I'd say I do
>have an opinion - be honest.  During the game, I've often heard, the ref/ump is
>without a doubt authority, so if nobody calls it, it's not a penalty - that's 
>how it is with even the most flagrant penalty...

>But if you're practicing, or playing a self-refereed game, BE HONEST.  If it 
>bounces off the net and goes out (or rather off of you), tell them.  Don't go
>shouting at the top of your lungs, "I TOUCHED IT, GO AHEAD AND PLAY IT!!!", but
>don't hide it to save yourself a point...

He is being honest.  I'm sure everyone realizes (maybe not immediately) that
if the blocker *didn't* touch it, he would have let the world know.  :-)

My question:

Is this a "referee's judgment" call?  Or can I argue it even when the ref
says "referee's judgment"?

Situation:

Ball is ping-pong'ing across the net.  I play a ball that's just come over.
I play it to one of our guys.  The ref blows the whistle and calls "4".  (Bad
call.)  He said, at some point, the ball didn't go over.  Then when I try to 
argue, he cites ref's judgment.  I don't think there's any place for "ref's 
judgment" there.  I was asking him to ask the person on the other team who 
directed the ball to me to verify that she was the one who hit it over.

Essentially, he never saw the play and lost count but he wouldn't let me
argue it.  I wanted to protest the game.  (He was a bad ref.)

So, is "4" a ref's judgment call (no blocks involved, no area for confusion
there)?  All I wanted was "errant whistle."

Jimmy Kuo
-- 
cjkuo@locus.com
"The correct answer to an either/or question is both!"
From: 160955r@garnet.berkeley.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: Re: BRAZIL: CAN THEY BE CHAMPIONS AGAIN?
Date: 17 Apr 92 02:17:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: agate.slcesINNaoo
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu

Arturo flamed a little bit over what he perceived as Brasil-bashing on my
part. I like Brasil, and, unqestionably, their WC record is by far the best.
However, I'd be surprised if they managed to get to the semifinals again,
although they have a lot of class players. As for the prospect of them playing
against Mexico in a world Cup Final, we should maybe get serious. Mexico played
so many times in the World Cup and the best thing they have to show is a second
round qualification, (1986-Mexico) where they "managed" to loose "only" after
penalty shots to Germany ( I still can not believe ALL Mexican players shot the ball
to the right of Schumacher - at that time it was well known that Schumacher
preferred to dive towards his right on penalty shots..)
All due respect to South American great teams: Brasil, Argentina (whose 
prospects I rank brighter than Brasil's) and sometimes Uruguay (not last time
around though - Belgium ridiculed them). But: Mexico? 
Again, let's get serious here...
-- 
Radu T. Tomescu at UCBerkeley
Department of Economics
From: a0v6282@rigel.tamu.edu (Art Velasquez)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: Re: NFL, soccer, and lots o' muscle
Date: 9 Apr 92 22:11:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


     While the net's been arguing over training, an interesting
question has arisen (IMO).
     I'm not familiar as to how important blind speed (e.g. 100m dash)
is in professional soccer outside the US and Canada.  What I'd be
interested to know, to get a handle on this, is how long it takes for
the average European footballer to run 50 or 100 meters in a sprint.
     Can anyone answer this?  Thanx in advance.

#     Art Velasquez                         a0v6282@rigel.tamu.edu     #
#     Nuclear Engineering Department          Texas A&M University     #
From: kdobrien@unix2.tcd.ie (kevin daniel o'brien)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: Re: Manchester United for Championship 1992
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:00:48 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.soccer
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin

It's just a shame that United couldn't hold on to a one goal when playing

against ten men. Three cheers for Steve Bruce and take it away Leeds.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
From: manoel@wam.umd.edu (Manoel Mendonca)
Subject: Re: PREDICTION 1994: WHO WILL WIN?
Organization: University of Maryland at College Park
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 16:03:18 GMT

In article <16APR199210415161@envmsa.eas.asu.edu> pino@envmsa.eas.asu.edu (Anthony) writes:
>In article <1992Apr16.140705.7773@wam.umd.edu>, manoel@wam.umd.edu (Manoel Mendonca) writes...
>>In article <15APR199213584690@envmsa.eas.asu.edu> pino@envmsa.eas.asu.edu (Anthony) writes:
>>In article <1992Apr15.195303.28105@news.cs.brandeis.edu>, st912880@pip.cc.brandeis.edu writes...
>>>
>>>>                   BRAZIL - 1994 WORLD CHAMPIONS
>>>                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>   We'll discuss this *AFTER* Brazil has qualified for the finals.
>> 
>>	Here is some facts of life:
>> 
>>	1 - Brazil is the ONLY team that qualified for ALL the finals.
>
>   Germany also qualified for every single world cup that it participated in.
>
>>	2 - An european team has NEVER won a world cup in the american
>                                                              ^^^^^^^^
>
>   You mean South American continent.  USA is in North America.
>
>>	    continent.
>> 
	By 'american continent' I mean South , Central and North America, I
think you get the point now :-) IMHO America is much more than USA , or even,
North America.


-- Manoel
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
From: u906789@bruny.cc.utas.edu.au (Mark Julian Turner)
Subject: Derby County??
Organization: University of Tasmania, Australia.
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 05:18:18 GMT

Does Derby County mean the same thing as Derbyshire? Or is it just another
"funny" word on the end of a teams name (like Albion,Villa,Wednesday etc.).
Also does Notts County mean Nottinghamshire also?


Mark Turner.
From: dstein@rhea.math.ucla.edu (David Stein)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: Re: High Scoring? (was Re: 1994 world cup...)
Date: 11 Apr 92 16:11:40 GMT
Reply-To: dstein@rhea.math.ucla.edu (David Stein)
Organization: UCLA, Mathematics Department

vlad@erg.sri.com (vlad) writes:
 
|> In any case, the Soviets have also been probably the best team in European
|> Championships. Their record:

   I don't think that the tournament became officially a European Championship
   until 1972.  In the beginning, especially, many countries did not take the
   "Cup of Nations" very seriously (which is it's original name, I think).
 
|> 1960 - 1st place
|> 1964 - 2nd place
|> 1968 - 4th place (in semifinal tied hometeam Italy 0-0, lost on coin toss)
                                                                   ^^^^^^^^^
   That must be the stupidest way to decide a game, EVER.

|> 1972 -  2nd place
|> 1976 - I do not know. However, given the fact that Dynamo Kiev was the most
|>      dominant team in World Soccere that year, I presume they did very well.
   
   Not exactly -- Czechoslovakia won the European Championship that year, 
                  beating USSR in the proccess (quarterfinals). 

|> 1980 - I do not know. Probably not too well.

   Not in the top 8. I believe that Greece(!) disqualified them. 

|> 1984 - Not in the top 8.
|> 1988 - 2nd place.

 
|> In World Cup:
|> 
|> 1962 - quaterfinal (5th-8th place)
|> 1966 - bronze (4th place)
          ?????????????????? 3=4?
  
|> Yea, right. I bet when they won European Championships or when Dynamo Kiev
|> won Supercup, or when htey trounced the Italians and Hungarians and won
|> Bronze in WC 66, the soccer powers did not even notice them. 

   I think it was Portugal (Eusibo!) who won the bronze, but I'm not sure.

   In any case, there is little doubt that the USSR has been a soccer power
   since the 60s.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm not a native speaker of English, so I'm not sure what I wrote.
Flames will be ignored unless you post them in perfect Czech.
================================ - David (the metamathician) - ===
From: bodie@plains.NoDak.edu (Justin M. Bodie)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: Seeking E-mail pen pal - who loves soccer!
Date: 14 Apr 92 21:47:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: plains.16798
Organization: North Dakota State University, Fargo


Hello!  Would anyone care to share his/her knowledge about the game by
writing to me in Fargo, North Dakota??  I would like to expand my field of
view as it relates to the world of soccer -- around here, news of the
matches in the U.K. and Europe are practically nonexistent.  I subscribe
to Soccer International, and that helps, but I'd like to meet someone who
has a view of soccer (football to the rest of the world) as much of a
spectator sport as American football is in the U.S.

It really amazes me how soccer has grown to be the world's most popular
sport, while the U.S. always seems to be catching up.  Is Women's soccer
popular in Europe?  I found it very disturbing that the U.S. winning the
Women's World Cup didn't even get a mention in the newspapers in towns the
size of Fargo, where thousands of kids play soccer and love it!  Without
cable TV, there's absolutely NO soccer on TV here! -- Especially as the
United States gears up for WC '94, I hope our major television networks
will consider broadcasting some of the European matches, or even some of
the MSL games!  With the general public in the U.S. being so ignorant
about soccer, the success of WC '94 depends in part on media hype - it's
sad to say, but true.

Thank you for reading and best wishes,

-- 
  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  Justin M. Bodie                          Internet: bodie@plains.NoDak.edu 
  Student, North Dakota State U.           Bitnet  : bodie@plains
  Fargo, North Dakota USA                  My hero : Charlie Brown
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
From: axwcp@acad2.alaska.edu (Bill Phillips)
Subject: Re: Correct Title = VICTORY
Organization: University of Alaska Anchorage
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 01:53:49 GMT

In article <5360@hsi86.hsi.com>, archer@hsi86.hsi.com (Garry Archer) writes:
> OK, who's going to list all the football stars featured in the film?
> 
> Everyone here remembers Pele and Bobby Moore, of course.
> 
> Remember Ossie Ardiles (Tottenham Hotspur), John Wark (Ipswich Town)?
> I can't remember 'em all.  Who was the goalie Stallone replaced?  Wasn't
> he an Irish international?  Anyway, I'll leave it to you all to fill
> in the blanks! :-)

I think that you'll find that most of the German ARMY (not National) team
members were actually players from Ipswich Town FC (at the time one of the
better teams in the English First Division, and soon to be back in that
Division!!  ;-}   GO YOU BLUES!!)

The goalie for the Germans was Laurie Sievel (sp), and some of the others that
I *think* were in it (I haven't seen the movie for about 5 years) were Mick
Mills, Colin Viljoen, and most of the rest of the team (whose names I've
forgotten).

BTW: I asked this once beforebut got no responses:  Could someone please let me
know the results of the forth round FA Cup matches between Chelsea - Everton
and Notts Forest - Hereford United.

					Thanks in advance
					Bill
__

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Bill Phillips    AXWCP@ACAD2.ALASKA.EDU  %    Ipswich Town Football Club
User Consultant                          % 2nd Division Champions 1991-1992
Computing and Technology Services        %    Back in the First Division
University of Alaska Anchorage           %            1992-1993  
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
From: mjf@cns.umist.ac.uk (Martin Ford)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: Re: Manchester United for Championship 1992
Date: 13 Apr 92 15:31:27 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.soccer
Organization: UMIST, Manchester, England.

kdobrien@unix2.tcd.ie (kevin daniel o'brien) writes:

>In <gjskelly.702929238@unix2.tcd.ie> gjskelly@unix2.tcd.ie (garrett joseph skelly) writes:

>>In <kdobrien.702925248@unix2.tcd.ie> kdobrien@unix2.tcd.ie (kevin daniel o'brien) writes:

>>>It's just a shame that United couldn't hold on to a one goal when playing
>>>against ten men. Three cheers for Steve Bruce and take it away Leeds.

Nice Brucey, nice son, nice one Brucey let's have another one! :-))
Only he knows why he brought down David White in the box when White
was running nowhere, which led to City equalising from the penalty.
After seeing White's miss from 6 yards Bruce must have wanted the
earth to swallow him up.  
Which led to:
10 men, you couldn't beat 10 men, you couldn't 10 men, you couldn't 10
men, 10 men,.........repeat until ground empties :-))

>>At least they'll be in Europe next season ( Tottenham Hotspur supporter
>>						Cheers,
>>							Garrett.
>That's what you think mate!!!!!
>                    Cheers,
>                           Paul Gascoigne Fan.

Fortunately it's not going to be the European Cup. So United will have
to make do with getting knocked out of the UEFA Cup by a team of
Scandanavian part-timers in the first round ;-))

Cheers

****************************************************************
**  Martin Ford         Manchester City, through and through  **
**  mjf@uk.ac.umist.cns       we're not going to europe,      **
**                            we're not going to europe,      **
****************************************************************
From: Dino.Ciccone@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Dino Ciccone)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: World cup and Games in '92
Date: 16 Apr 92 18:47:37 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service


I heard from friends that there will some soccer games played in the 
US this spring and early summer.
Does anyone know the dates on the games along the east cost?

I understand that Italy is coming and since I am a big fan of Italy could     
someone just list the Italian soccer games?

And if poissible does anyone know if tickets  went on sale and if how 
much they cost?

This would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you

				DINO
				ciccone@vader.eng.uri.edu
FORZA ITALIA 
			ITALIA #1  

--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
From: dm@hpopd.pwd.hp.com (Darren Munson)
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 15:39:26 GMT
Subject: Re: Partick Thistle / Aldershot
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NSG-PWD, UK.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer

Hi again,

Well coming from COLCHESTER I also have been watching for news and the local
paper said that only one team would go up.

Lets hope that it's Colchester Utd.

Regards,

Darren.
From: mfiguero@lonestar.utsa.edu (Miguel . Figueroa)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: Re: S.F. Bay Blackhawks news
Date: 10 Apr 92 22:08:06 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio


 Hey, Colin, you forgot to name the site of this friendly game between
 the Blackhawks and U.N.A.M.

                                                                   Miguel
From: rpfortn@cs.vu.nl (Pfortner RP)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: Ussr history (was Re: High Scoring?)
Date: 9 Apr 92 13:56:28 GMT
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam


>>several people state USSR is a soccer power.

>When did this happen? What has the USSR ever won in soccer?
>I stated in my original note that the first time I am aware of the soccer
>powers taking note and complimenting the Russian game was at the 86 world
>cup. The emergence of the USSR as a competitive soccer entity occured in
>the mid to late 80s as best I can determine.
>
>Roy


That's not entirely true. The USSR has been participating in
many World Cups during the years (remember famous goalie Jashin ??)
and have played in the EC with much succes (I think they've played
in the first EC final in Spain, but I'm not sure about that).
From: wth@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Tracey Haldane)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
Subject: Re: Scottish :St Mirren relegated
Date: 9 Apr 92 15:23:35 GMT
Reply-To: wth@aiai.UUCP (Tracey Haldane)
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland

In article <1992Apr9.103123.29243@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk> dam@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (David Morning) writes:
>
>St Mirren 1    1  Celtic
>
>Well, the nail biting at Love Street is finally over.
>Despite a gritty 1-1 draw with Celtic, Airdrie's victory over Hibs effectively
>sealed Saints fate and St Mirren are now officially relegated to Division 1

No they are not officially relegated as it is still possible for them
to stay up if they win all their games and Airdrie lose, but of course
they also have to overcome a large goal difference.

>
>Likely candidates for departure from Love Street are Money, Torfason, Stickroth
>and possibly Lambert, none of whom relish playing 1 st Div football next
>year.
>
>Dave
>
>:-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-(
>
>
>-- 
> ============================================================================
>| Dave Morning                     | "Broon Hee Haw Maw"                     | 
>|dam@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk             |                                         |
> ============================================================================
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
From: JI.RCB@isumvs.iastate.edu (Robert Bergmann)
Subject: Re: Pitch Widths
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 14:20:08 GMT

>How do these pitch widths compare with the narrow pitch width of the
>NY Jets stadium modified for world cup soccer? I am concerned that it is even m
>ore narrow. Am I correct??

According to an article in the most recent "Soccer America", the width
of the pitch at Giants Stadium for the world cup will be 70 yards,
certainly less than the 75 yards which FIFA previously regarded as the
minimum acceptable.

Reader Bob
Xref: sparky rec.sport.soccer:5074 soc.culture.french:2861
From: dvlkhh@cs.umu.se (Kent Hedlundh)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer,soc.culture.french
Subject: French team of the week - Toulon
Date: 7 Apr 92 14:23:11 GMT
Organization: Dep. of Info.Proc, Umea Univ., Sweden

Sporting Club de Toulon et du Var
---------------------------------
Founded: 1946
Address: Stade de Bon-Rencontre; BP 4015; 83069 TOULON.
Stadium: Stade de Bon-Rencontre, same address.
    Capacity: 18000                    Record 17117 vs Bordeaux 9/8 1985
Colurs: Yellow, Yellow, Yellow and Blue.
Honours: -
President: Albert Mansana - 54 years.
Trainer: Pierre Mosca - 24/7 1945.

PLAYERS:

    Goalies:
         Borelli, Luc - 2/7 1965 - 1.82 m, 75 kg - 68 games.
         Songo'o, Jacques - 17/3 1964 - 1.82 m, 80 kg - 22 games. Cam-Fra.

    Defenders:
         Rabat, Thierry - 13/5 1962 - 1.76 m, 70 kg - 115 games.
         Pean, Eric - 10/9 1963 - 1.78 m, 72 kg - 318 games. 4 goals.
         Berenguier, Jean-Louis - 28/2 1958 - 1.74 m, 70 kg - 246 games.
         Alfano, Gennaro - 6/2 1958 - 1.75 m, 72 kg - 231 games. 11 goals.
         Carvalho, Philippe - 28/9 1967 - 1.78 m, 68 - 37 games. 1 goal.
         Blanc, Andre - 19/11 1966 - 1.80 m, 72 kg - 26 games.
         Thys, Philippe - 30/8 1959 - 1.74 m, 70 kg - 293 games. 5 goals.
         Rasori, Christophe - 13/3 1970 - 1.68 m, 60 kg.
         Ferri, Patrice - 9/7 1963 - 1.75 m, 68 kg - 186 games. 7 goals.

    Midfielders:
         Zahoui, Francois - 21/7 1961 - 1.78 m, 76 kg - 212 games. 13 goals.
                            Int. Ivory Coast (+Fra).
         Revelles, Patrick - 20/9 1968 - 1.80 m, 69 kg - 28 games. 10 goals.
         Passi, Franck - 28/3 1966 - 1.74 m, 69 kg - 156 games. 3 goals.
         Rhinan, Xavier - 9/19 1968 - 1.80 m, 70 kg - 4 games.
         Rodriguez, Bernard - 6/12 1964 - 1.76 m, 73 kg - 28 games.

    Forwards:
         Meyrieu, Frederic - 9/2 1968 - 1.70 m, 64 kg - 83 games. 4 goals.
         Anziani, Philippe - 21/9 1961 - 1.76, 70 kg - 379 games. 92 goals.
                             5 Internationals.
         Pineda, Michel - 9/6 1964 - 1.82 m, 75 kg - 18 games. 8 goals.
                          (Spanish +Fra).
         Collot, Patrick - 22/6 1968 - 1.76 m, 72 kg.
         Mangione, Yves - 27/12 1964 - 1.85 m, 82 - 13 games. 2 goals.
                          (***Now with Bastia)

ADD:     Rodriguez, Leonardo - International Argentinian.

Kent


+---------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| Kent Hedlundh             | Les Girondins pour le Championnat de D2 1992!   |
| Dept. of Computer Science | France and Sweden for the EC final 1992!        |
| University of Umea        | Monaco pour la Coupe des Coupes 1992!           |
| S-90187 UMEA     SWEDEN   | E-Mail: dvlkhh@cs.umu.se     IP: 130.239.96.17  |
+---------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+
               "It's always good to talk soccer!" - Marco Petroni