HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ajn@physics.wm.edu (smaller than I look on TV.)
Subject: Re: help! Show with two bus drivers
Reply-To: ajn@physics.wm.edu
Organization: Rio de Caca Illuminati
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 02:18:50 GMT

The show I think you are alluding to was called "On The Busses"
Featured the hilarious (sic) antics of a London bus driver and 
his disreputable conductor, (the guy who used to collect the 
fares). There was a good lot of inter-bus rivalry in the depot
and an inspector who naturally had it in for the heros.
The bus driver (names have been purged by time) had a black family
living next door - this led to much exchanging of racist slurs
(such things passed for comedy in the 70's). I think it was a London
Weekend Television production, and may have spun off a couple of movies.

---
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|..Alastair Neil................................|                             |
|..(804)-221-3533..[ajn@physics.wm.edu].........|       None Shall Sleep      |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: RLJU100@ELM.CC.KCL.AC.UK
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: RE: ON THE BUSES posting above ^^^^
Date: 27 Jul 1992 10:52:39 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

ON THE BUSES....

Sorry, Blakey was the INSPECTOR at the depot...not the clippy......

Steve
From: neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: UK TV Charts for 22-28 June 1992
Date: 27 Jul 92 09:25:01 GMT
Organization: Dept of Computer Science, Heriot-Watt University, Scotland

In article <5392@mccuts.uts.mcc.ac.uk> zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk (Geoff Lane) writes:
>
>
>When recording the latest Red Dwarf repeats I found that every single
>episode started at or later than 8:33 pm yet every week the start time in
>the Radio Times, newspapers, Ceefax etc was announced as 8:30.  Channel 4
>also does this - when the Cosby Show was on at 6:30 Sundays it always
>started at a time beween 6:28 and 6:30. 
>

4-Tel on Channel 4 should update as they run the StarText service to people
with suitable equipped video recorders (which are programmed from the
TV pages and monitor them incase somethng overruns). Ceefax - Well it
went down the pan when News and Current Affairs took over.

What pisses me about Ceefax/Oracke in general (mostly ceefax) is say it
is 10pm at night and you call up the TV page, you have to wade through the
afternoon page before you get to the evening one. Doesn't the computer
generating the stuff know when to kill expired pages ??

Neil


****************************| Sig' Time |*********************************
JANET: 	  neilp@uk.ac.hw.cs   *   Neil Postlethwaite, Rm G.25, 
INTERNET: neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk   *   Dept of Computer Science,  
UUCP: 	  ..!uknet!hwcs!neilp *   Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton Campus
                              *   Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.
------------------------------*-------------------------------------------
Computer Science Account      *   Phone +44 (0)31 449-5111 x4174
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
From: bussink@trucks.enet.dec.com (Erik Bussink)
Subject: Can the BBC2 show STDSN (StarTrek DeepSpaceNine)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, EIC Solent, Hampshire UK
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 11:47:03 GMT


Ok, the BBC has taken STTNG of the air until 199x, and STDSN (Deep Space Nine)
will come out early 1993 in the USA, could the BBC2 have it straight away ?
and show it the same week as in the USA ? 
I think it's a good idea, don't you ?

					Erik Bussink
					Email: cs91eeb@brunel.ac.uk
					       bussink@trucks.enet.dec.com
From: swc@spambo.uk.sun.com (Steve Cumming - Sun UK)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Do You Remember any Gay/Lesbian Characters on TV Series?
Date: 23 Jul 92 12:12:52 GMT
Reply-To: swc@spambo.uk.sun.com
Organization: Sun Microsystems
NNTP-Posting-Host: spambo.uk.sun.com

> Dr. Rose-Marie, played by Barbara Murray (I think).

Barbara Flyn, she also appeared in the the Beiderbeck series along side 
James Bolam


---
Steve Cumming.
Sun Microsystems.
U.K. Answer Centre.
Phone: +44 276 691974
From: ekho.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Blakes 7 suggestion/article
Date: 31 Jul 92 00:30:45 GMT
Organization: Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton

Hello, all!

  In going through my mail, it occurs to me that there are quite a few of 
us on the Internet who enjoy Blakes 7.  Why not get together and see if 
we can make a Blakes 7 newsgroup and have it last, this time... :-)  (We 
could make a solemn pledge to keep the posts concerning the last episode, 
"Blake" down to a minimum, perhaps even to make this a creative group as 
well, and write original stories... Well, how about it? ;-) )

  Another idea hit me as I was reading my issue of "Tarriel Cell" put out 
by the fan club, O*R*A*C (Organized Response to Avon's Call).  In the 
newsletter, Kathryn Anderson wonders, "So how many other Internetters are 
there in O*R*A*C?"  Why not send her a list?  (I bet she wasn't expecting 
*that* when she wrote that article! ;-} )

  If you would like to participate in my adopted project, E-mail me your 
name and Internet address, and I'll compile a list.  Mention if you would 
like to help in one or both proposals... 

  This could be the start of something great!

  Well now, that makes it _all_ worthwhile... ;-)


            Yours in Time and Space,

               Ekho (Killer Queen, Dynamite with a Laser Beam)
From: bob@castle.ed.ac.uk (Bob Gray)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: On The Buses....
Date: 27 Jul 92 15:44:51 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

RLJU100@ELM.CC.KCL.AC.UK writes:
>The ugly Olive was played by Anna Karen...who later posed (as publicity for
>the series) in a swimsuit, presumably to prove her body wasn't as bad as her
>face.....

And even more surprisingly, when she started out as an
actress she supplimented her income by stripping and
modelling.

The photographs were re-cycled by one of those men's
magazines as a celebrity photoset in the late seventies.
	Bob.
From: pm3_norr@csd.brispoly.ac.uk (Paul Norris)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Very P Practice
Date: 23 Jul 92 08:09:21 GMT
Organization: Bristol Polytechnic, England

From _The Guardian_  Tues 22 July

"Peter Davison emerges as naive hero Stephen Daker in A Very Polish
Practice.  Peter Bowles, Alan Bates and Alfred Molina also appear in 
this season."

Other items coming up according to the grauniad:

Serialisations of Ben Elton's _Stark_; Dirk Bogarde's _Voices In The
Garden_; _Lady Chatterley's Lover_; _A Year In Provence and Ruth 
Rendell's _Gallowglass_.

A Feature drama about Robert Maxwell;  Feature length Lovejoy and Agatha
Christie (The Mirror Crack'd) at Christmas; Patrick Malahide in series
based on Ngaio Marsh's tec books.

Debbie Horsfield (Making Out) has a new venture called _The Riff Raff Element


TTFN

Paul



-- 
Nothing takes the taste out of peanut butter quite like unrequited love.
                                            --  Charlie Brown
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
From: lorne.murphy@rose.com (lorne murphy)
Subject: BLACK ADDER 5
Organization: Rose Media Inc, Toronto, Ontario.
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 22:28:25 GMT
X-Gated-By: Usenet <==> RoseMail Gateway (v1.70)


Date Entered: 07-30-92 03:38
Hello All....

apparently B.A. V is playing in Britain now??? Is there any truth to
this rumour for a little ol' Canadian like me?

Lorne    :)
---
   RoseMail 1.70: Usenet: Rose Media - Hamilton (416) 575-5363
From: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: BLACK ADDER 5
Date: 31 Jul 92 12:46:36 GMT
Reply-To: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)

In article <1992Jul30.133651.1948@rose.com>, lorne.murphy@rose.com
(lorne murphy) writes:
|>
|>Date Entered: 07-30-92 03:38
|>Hello All....
|>
|>apparently B.A. V is playing in Britain now??? Is there any truth to
|>this rumour for a little ol' Canadian like me?
|>
|>Lorne    :)
|>---
|>   RoseMail 1.70: Usenet: Rose Media - Hamilton (416) 575-5363
         
   Unfortunately not.
 
+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Gary Bradley        |   "You receive a love letter from me and |
| ORACLE Corp, UK     |                  you're f*cked forever!" |
| Edinburgh, SCOTLAND |        - Frank Booth ("Blue Velvet")     |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| "God damn the censor man"                                      |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
From: sjg@wan.inf.rl.ac.uk (Simon Greenaway)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Olympic Coverage - David Coleman's commenta
Date: 28 Jul 92 08:42:08 GMT
Reply-To: sjg@wan.inf.rl.ac.uk
Organization: SERC Rutherford Appleton Laboratories


"And the course is very flat here" - BBC1 Rowing Commentator

"And thats a new British record, and I believe the fastest they've ever done "
				- BBC1 Swimming Commentator (The Expert one)

Does anyone know the names?
From: cudep@warwick.ac.uk (Ian Dickinson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Olymballs
Date: 30 Jul 92 13:47:37 GMT
Organization: Team Limpid's Meathead With Aptitude - Kunst und Wahnsinn

In article <12648@hardy.rl.ac.uk> sjg@inf.rl.ac.uk writes:
><After shots of Women breast feeding her child>
>"Did you spot it? Live breast feeding.. I didn't know that was an Olympic sport"
>			- David Coleman

No, it was Desmond Lynham.

Another olymball was in the 56kg weightlifting on Tuesday(?).
I don't know who the commentator was but it reminds of of the classic snooker
one about the blue being behind the pink for those watching in B&W.
Please forgive any errors in the weight conversions below:

"This little man is lifting almost two and a half times his body weight.
 Over twenty three stones, which for viewers too young for pre-metric
 units is  326 pounds."

Aaargh!

Cheers,
-- 
\/ato - Ian Dickinson - NIC handle: ID17                              Yo! Bum 
vato@csv.warwick.ac.uk  ...!mcsun!uknet!warwick!vato                     rush
/I=I/S=Dickinson/OU=CSV/O=Warwick/PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD= /C=GB/                 the
@c=GB@o=University of Warwick@ou=Computing Services@cn=Ian Dickinson     show
From: ijp@oak10.doc.ic.ac.uk (Ian Palmer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: UK TV Charts for 22-28 June 1992
Date: 30 Jul 92 09:57:58 GMT
Organization: Department of Computing, Imperial College, University of London, UK.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite) writes:
: 
: What pisses me about Ceefax/Oracke in general (mostly ceefax) is say it
: is 10pm at night and you call up the TV page, you have to wade through the
: afternoon page before you get to the evening one. Doesn't the computer
: generating the stuff know when to kill expired pages ??
: 
: Neil
: 

I guess not, I think it's up to some bod to do it, as sometimes they
(when they remember to delete a page) delete the wrong one. It's great
to see the afternoon T.V. then the advert then the afternoon T.V. then
the advert....... It's usually very bad on Sundays on Oracle, page 256
(last night's T.V. review) very often does not materialise in all
regions, it does usually in London, but not often elsewhere. I guess
they get the cleaner to do it :-)

Oh and speeking of T.V. ratings :-) The second week's El-bore-ado
ratings are even better (or worse depending on how you look at it)
than the first weeks. Can't remember the exact figures (I forgot to
bring the peice of paper with me (ho hum)), but :

Mon 13th July : 8.8 (ish) million 13th in the BBC1 chart
Wed 15th July : 8.2 (ish) million 17th in the BBC1 chart
Fri 17th July : 4.4       million (below 30 in the chart)

4.4 million, compared with over 15 million for The Street which is on
just afterwards (and isn't repeated on Sunday afternoon). 

Ian

--
                            E-mail : ijp@doc.ic.ac.uk
 ___           __       Snail mail : Department of Computing, Huxley Building,
  /  _   _    /_/ _   / _ _   _  _   Imperial College, 180 Queens Gate,
_/_ (_|_| )  /   (_|_(_| ) )_|/_)    London. SW7 2BZ. England.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
From: apm@hpopd.pwd.hp.com (Andrew Merritt)
Subject: Re: Olymballs
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NSG-PWD, UK.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1scd1 PL4
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 13:02:34 GMT

sjg@inf.rl.ac.uk writes:
: <After shots of Women breast feeding her child>
: 
: "Did you spot it? Live breast feeding.. I didn't know that was an Olympic sport"
: 			- David Coleman

It was Desmond Lynham, actually, and I took the way he said it to be a dig at
the camera operators who have a tendency to zoom in on attractive women in
the crowd, especially if they are wearing revealing outfits.   I don't think
it counts as a Colemanball.

Andrew
From: rsoc@doc.ic.ac.uk (Rob O'Connor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Olympic Coverage - David Coleman's commentary.
Date: 30 Jul 92 15:30:09 GMT
Organization: Department of Computing, Imperial College, University of London, UK.

In article <1992Jul27.115615.13000@aber.ac.uk> mhr@aber.ac.uk (Michael Richards) writes:
>Dear All.
>
>	So okay, its unsporting to hunt wounded prey, but since the Olympics
>have a stranglehold on BBC1 (except for Eldorado of course), I suggest that
>we get some enjoyment out of the blasted things..... That is David Coleman's
>commentary - some morsals from the opening ceremony.....

Hmm, this made me titter last night. Talking to Nick Gillingham (?) the swimmer
who won a bronze medal, all I caught was:

So about your groin injury,...,it's probably caused by overuse then?

Rob.
-- 
Internet: rsoc@doc.ic.ac.uk   Tel: +44 71 589 5111 x5070   Fax: +44 71 581 8024
From: andy@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Andy Clews)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Olympic Coverage - David Coleman's commentary.
Date: 30 Jul 92 13:29:54 GMT
Organization: University of Sussex
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

mhr@aber.ac.uk (Michael Richards) writes:
>best gaffs to keep us all amused in the next two weeks.
>
>	Any takers?

It was useful to have Coleman commenting on the opening ceremony.
Listening out for gaffs would keep you awake during in the
ultra-boring hour and a half while all the 13,000 or so athletes
trooped in.

This is not a Colemanball, but it was funny that at the crucial
moment when Chris Boardman was about to have the gold medal hung
round his neck, the camera switched to a section of the crowd, and
only returned when it was all done and he was shown shaking the
bloke's hand. I bet his mum wasn't too pleased.

It would be fun to have a few contributions of Murray Walker quotes
from the Grands Prix coverage. For example...
"There have been no problems at all with the car, apart from the car
itself..."

-- 
Andy Clews, Computing Service, Univ. of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, England
JANET: andy@uk.ac.sussex.syma      OTHER NETWORKS: andy@syma.sussex.ac.uk
From: sbradley@wiz.outb.wimsey.bc.ca (Steve Bradley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: muffler
Date: 25 Jul 92 18:13:33 PDT
Organization: Wizard Online

Being an Englishman living in Canada, I'll try to explain what muffler
means in English......

Well,, A muff, in England, means a ladies genital area, hence a muffler
means a ladies genital area, oh what's the word, caresser...
It's pretty funny because over here a Muffin Break is a coffee shop,
whereas in England it means something totally different.

Another good phrase found over here is "FANNY". In northern America, a fanny
is a bottom, backside, derriere, whatever you call it...well in England
it means the same as Muff....

So don't go to England and say "Hey man, your wife's gotta lovely
fanny" unless you want to be severly booted in the bollocks (another
english word people don't know in Canada)....

Regards....Steve (homesick) Bradley

"This is the voice of the Mysterons. We know you can hear us earthmen"

--- Via UCI v1.02 (C-Net Amiga)
From: amcalind@cs.strath.ac.uk (Anthony McAlinden IE91)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Cap'n Scarlett ( & Cap'n Bob)
Date: 21 Jul 92 15:13:55 GMT
Distribution: uk
Organization: Comp. Sci. Dept., Strathclyde Univ., Glasgow, Scotland.
Originator: amcalind@fleming-04

I doubt the episodes would have been in a BBC warehouse, because the last
time I saw the series (about 4-5 years ago), it was on ITV.

In fact, my local region (Scottish TV) had bought the whole job lot to
show on weekday mornings through the summer holidays. So possibly your
ITV station is just sitting on a pile of videotapes, ready to screen them
at 4am one morning.

The wonders of night time TV ;-)

Possibly the original film was destroyed - after it had been transferred to
VT. But the episodes I saw were in very good nick. I'm sure they were
shown in England too, for a "Private Eye" lookalike was between the late,
much missed, Robert Maxwell (!) and Captain Black.

My only detailed recollection of the series was that it seemed a lot less
childish than "Thunderbirds" and had that famous health warning (presumably
for US TV) :

Captain Scarlett is indestructible, you are not. Remember this, do not try
to imitate him....

Which probably explains why I'm still here to write this :)

                           Tony


- As David Mellor has proven, bad breath isn't a problem....
From: imc@prg.ox.ac.uk (Ian Collier)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Science Fiction - Letter to Radio Times
Date: 31 Jul 92 11:41:21 GMT
Distribution: uk
Organization: Oxford University Computing Laboratory, UK
X-Local-Date: Friday, 31st July 1992 at 12:39pm BST

In article <1992Jul30.124830.19554@syma.sussex.ac.uk>, andy@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Andy Clews) wrote:

>And isn't it interesting that there haven't been any letters (so far)
>about how crappy Eldorado is?       [No - Ed.]
>And that's despite press reports that Eldorado has failed to make the
>top 30 in the ratings.

It takes at least two weeks for a letter about a programme to appear in the
Radio Times.  See, next week's contains 5 letters (or extracts from
letters).  Admittedly, none say in so many words that it's utter tosh
(assuming it is tosh, that is - I've never watched it so I'm not qualified
to judge ;-) ), but some are pretty condemning.

Here they are:

Yet another everyday story, this time of Costa folk.  What worries me is the
costa production, especially the costa lodging and feeding the cast and
crew, apparently for the next ten years.  Not to mention the costa the
declining mental health of the nation. --Mark Woolf, Kings Norton, Birmingham
[Well said, but it would have been better without the corny pun. -imc]

What a welcome relief Eldorado is.  I am a soap addict but am bored by the
same old depressing story lines in EastEnders or the silly stories from
Neighbours [but that's what makes Neighbours so fun to watch ;-) -imc].
Eldorado is fresh, alive, and full of sun, sea and, dare I say it, sex!
[what, at 7pm?  You gotta be kidding! -imc]
                                            --Millicent D'Arcy, Formby, Lancs

I find it objectionable that at seven in the evening a character expressed
his wish to "give it [a female actor] one".  [and not only that but in all
the trailers too -imc]                   --Mr M Simmons, Bromley Common, Kent

After Angels, EastEnders and now Eldorado, may we hope that the latter is
the BBC's last indulgence of Julia Smith's obsession with the proletariat?
Particularly as her productions give us only its mean, miserable and ugly
aspects, and omit humour, resilience, kindness and joy.  Having grown up in
Stepney E1, I can assure her that the latter qualities abound, and in
abundance.                                         --Mrs J Carr-Jones, Woking


Children were told by Andi Peters that the first episode was "Brilliant". I
therefore allowed my daughter to watch it: having sat through 20 minutes I
came to regret this decision.  I now feel strongly that it is not at all
suitable for children.                         --Mrs H Haywood, Maldon, Essex


So, four to one against: two on grounds of sex, one because it's depressing,
and one because it cost too much.

Ian Collier
Ian.Collier@prg.ox.ac.uk | imc@ecs.ox.ac.uk
From: zlsiida@fs1.mcc.ac.uk (dave budd)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Poor timing (wasRe: UK TV Charts for 22-28 June 1992
Date: 29 Jul 92 09:02:42 GMT
Distribution: uk
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre
Originator: netnews@uts.mcc.ac.uk

>>In article <2527@nlsun1.oracle.nl> nroworth@nl.oracle.com (Nick Roworth) writes:
>>>Has anyone else noticed that programmes scheduled for the same start time,
>>>actually begin about two minutes later on BBC2? This gets so bad in some cases
>>>if you watch the end of a programme on BBC2 you can miss the begiining of a
>>>programme on BBC1.

If they had an email address we could completely clog them by all of us 
complaining every time it happens.  
I have fax access here........what's their number?

+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  I don't take part in any sport that requires me to change clothes  |
|  Dave Budd, MCC, Oxford Rd, Manchester, England   (44)061-275-6033  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: ijp@oak3.doc.ic.ac.uk (Ian Palmer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: UK TV Charts for 15-21 June 1991
Date: 22 Jul 92 10:41:57 GMT
Organization: Department of Computing, Imperial College, University of London, UK.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

andrewc@spider.co.uk (Andrew Cannon) writes:
: In article <1992Jul15.111630.13566@cs.nott.ac.uk> psyhtjs@unicorn.nott.ac.uk (T.Sneath) writes:
: >In article <2499@nlsun1.oracle.nl> gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley) writes:
: >>   Can anyone explain how these viewing figures are arrived at. It is a
: >>random sample of people surveyed, or something much more Big Brotherish? 
: >
: >Certain people have a special box on their television which records
: >whenever the television is switched on or off, and which channel is being
: >viewed. This information is then sent regularly to the company who is
: >surveying.
: >
: >Regards,
: >
: >Tim Sneath
: 
: I always wanted to get one of these boxes and switch channels every 30 secs to
: screw the ratings !
: 

That wouldn't make that much of a difference, all that would happen is
that all the programs you switched between would bet marginally higher
peek ratings. 

Personally I doubt the accuracy of the system used. Consider, they are
supposed to have a represenative cross section of the population
involved in the monitoring scheme. That means that the proportion of
each 'type' of person in the scheme should match the national
proportion of that type of person. Now there are going to be some
groups of people that are either not going to be party to the
monitoring scheme (I can just see High Court Judges, and the like
having a T.V. monitoring ket), and there are going to be groups that
are very unlikely to be covered at all (for example students). In fact
the most likely people to have the kit are also (generalising here)
the most likely people to sit and watch cattle fodder. Thus BBC1 and
ITV get high ratings (all they show is cattle fodder, after all), and
BBC2 and CH4 get very low ratings (no cattle fodder).

Now I'm not suggesting that BBC2 and CH4 will have 'actual' rating as
high as BBC1 and ITV (after all, Mr. and Mrs. average are cattle
fodder lovers), but I would not be supprised at all if the BBC1 and
ITV ratings were too high, and the BBC2 and CH4 ratings were too low.

Plus due to the way the system works, someone who is in the
monitoring scheme can actually watch a programme but not register, and
can also not watch a programme but be registered as watching it. This
is because although the channel is automatically monitiored, each
person in the household (as I understand it) has a remote controll
thingy with two buttons on it. When they start watching they press one
button, when they finish they press the other. 

Ian

--
                            E-mail : ijp@doc.ic.ac.uk
 ___           __       Snail mail : Department of Computing, Huxley Building,
  /  _   _    /_/ _   / _ _   _  _   Imperial College, 180 Queens Gate,
_/_ (_|_| )  /   (_|_(_| ) )_|/_)    London. SW7 2BZ. England.