HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 92 18:39:43 EDT
From: David Leibold <DLEIBOLD@VM1.YorkU.CA>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Canada to Mexico Link Now Under Teleglobe
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 753, Message 1 of 18

 From the Aug-Sep '92 {Global Connections} publication from Teleglobe:

Teleglobe to carry Canada-Mexico traffic:

As of September 1, Teleglobe Canada has carried international
telephone traffic between Canada and Mexico. This is the result of an
interconnection agreement between Teleglobe and Telmex, Mexico's
carrier, and a companion agreement between Teleglobe and Stentor,
which represents Canada's domestic telephone companies.

Canada-Mexico traffic was traditionally carried by the domestic
Canadian telephone companies via American carriers' networks. The
agreements will lead to benefits for Canadians such as acceptance of
Canadian calling cards in Mexico. Negotiations are under way for a
wider variety of services, and the agreements give Teleglobe, Stentor,
and other Canadian carriers more flexibility in rate setting, which
will likely improve rates for consumers.


dleibold@vm1.yorku.ca
Date: 28 Sep 92 20:29:28 GMT
From: friedl@mtndew.Tustin.CA.US (Stephen Friedl)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Funny 800 Number Spelling
Organization: Steve's Personal machine / Tustin, CA
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 747, Message 12 of 14

Ron Dippold writes:

> It's a 900 number [phone sex lines], but close enough ... 1-900-FUN-DUCK.
> Take a look at that "3" key ... I wonder how that one got by.

John Higdon writes:

> I know of no number-issuing entity, LEC or IEC, who will refuse to
> give out any number you want if it is available. I have several
> clients who have the last four digits '3825' for the very spelling you
> are implying.

There are valid reasons for getting 3825.  A company, Etak Inc, up in
the Bay Area makes mobile navigation systems that show a current map
on a display, letting you know where you are (pretty cool stuff).
Their phone number is nnn-ETAK, which coincidently maps to nnn-DUCK
and at least one other less fortunate word.


Stephen J Friedl | Software Consultant | Tustin, CA |     +1 714 544-6561
3b2-kind-of-guy  | I speak for me ONLY |   KA8CMY   | uunet!mtndew!friedl
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 92 14:14:14 -0700
From: henry@ads.com (Henry Mensch)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: AT&T Public Phone 2000
Reply-To: henry@ads.com
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 759, Message 1 of 14

stevef@wrq.com (Steve Forrette) wrote:

> The bill for the call comes in two parts: One for the call, which
> appears on your regular calling card bill, and a separate bill for the
> terminal rental.  

Nope ... the calls and the terminal rental appear on the same bill (in
my case), which comes from that special place Chosen Just for This
Purpose.


# henry mensch / booz, allen & hamilton, inc.  / <henry@ads.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 16:05:53 -0400
From: byrnes@sunsmart.dab.ge.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: U.S. Cable Television Re-Regulation 
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 733, Message 12 of 13

Mr Higdon seems to have a large knowledge base on the telephone
subject, but on other communications subjects he is mis-informed.

He replied that real estate covenents do not affect Amateur Radio
antennas.  This is very wrong!  The FCC has said that since these are
private contracts, they will not get involved.  Yes, the FCC has
pre-empted local regulations on but not the covenents.

The other subject concerns TVRO (home satellite dishes).  The reason
so many of us home dish owners are supporting the cable bill is
because the cable companies control the program providers.  This
artificialy drives the costs of alternative programming to a higher
level then cable.  The purpose of the bill is to "Level The playing
field", to be sure that the alternative distributors can get the
programming at a market price rather than a monopoly price, which is
the case now.  Cable in most places is a monopoly, because the
alternative providers (wireless cable, sat dishes) have to buy
programming from sources controled by the cable companies.  Cable in
other areas is a monopoly because the companies know that rates in
areas where the consumer can choose from more than one company are
lower, so they won't build.


Arthur J. Byrnes

Disclaimer; These views are those only of the author, Arthur.


[Moderator's Note: I read a book the other day, but I forgot the
arthur's name, Author.  PAT]
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 08:48:02 -0500
From: martin@datacomm.ucc.okstate.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Recourse on Cordless Eavesdropping?
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 734, Message 12 of 13

Since there is no law against what the security guard is doing, the
only other recourse is public education.  If it is at all practical,
let all your neighbors know what this jerk is doing.  Give them a
physical description.  Just remember that you want to win the battle
and the war, as well.


Martin McCormick WB5AGZ   Stillwater, OK
O.S.U. Computer Center Data Communications Group
Date: 4 Oct 92 18:40:13 GMT
From: sp@questor.wimsey.bc.ca (Steve Pershing)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: ZyXEL ROMs v:5.02 Available From Mail-Server
Organization: Questor|Free Usenet News|Vancouver, BC: +1 604 681 0670
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 761, Message 1 of 8

The latest release of ROM firmware for ZyXEL 1496S and 1496E modems
has been received from ZyXEL USA, and are available by mail-server
request from Questor as ZOO archives.

> (If you do not have access to an EPROM programmer, we may be able to
> help with that...
> Please ask by sending e-mail to:    system@questor.wimsey.bc.ca
> and we will respond promptly.)

The Questor mail-server automatically uuencodes binary files, with
xxencoding available as an option.

To request either set of ROM binaries, send e-mail to:

        mail-server@questor.wimsey.bc.ca

and in an otherwise blank body text, insert the following line(s):

/GET prodinfo/zyxel/rm1496e.zoo
/GET prodinfo/zyxel/rm1496s.zoo

  --->  If you require XXencoding, use the following format:

/GET prodinfo/zyxel/rm1496e.zoo xxencode

         - or -

/GET prodinfo/zyxel/rm1496s.zoo xxencode

Questor also *sells* ZyXEL and Telebit modems at *very* reasonable prices.

For a copy of the current price list, add the following line to your
request:

INFO USACOST    (for USA prices)
INFO WLDCOST    (for World prices)
INFO CDNCOST    (for Canadian prices)

A complete file listing (including TIFF images of spec sheets) is also
available by adding the following line:

INFO FILINDX

The following is a copy of the release note for version 5.02 ROMs.  It
is also include in the ZOO archive:


		Firmware 5.02 release note
  -----------------------------------------------------------

1. AT detection has been tuned for plus model.

2. "RINGING" response is restored, set bit 6 of s42 can disable
   this function.

3. Fast Rate re-Negotiation fall back/forward range change from
   16800-7200 to 16800-4800.

4. Improve the silence/quiet detection in voice mode.

5. Fix Caller ID and distinctive ring bugs.

6. Can send to fax machine which has no answer tone.

7. Correct response messages associated with ATX2 & ATX3.

8. Fix compatibile problem with some fax machchine which can
   not response to MPS signal correctly without some delay between
   fax message and MPS.

9. Add Austra country code (233) for 120 ms flash time.

10. Add Japan country code (234) for 20 pps pulse dial and
    ring detector spec.

11. Correct remote digital loopback problem in async non error
    control mode.

12. Correct frequency range problem of ring detector.

13. Correct 1300 Hz calling tone to be recognized as fax calling tone
    problem.


        Steve Pershing, System Administrator, The QUESTOR Project
  FREE access to Environ, Sci, Med, & AIDS news, and more.  [also UUCP]
        on a ZyXEL-1496S v.42bis, v.32bis, v.33, up to 16,800bps.

    POST: 1027 Davie St., Box 486, Vancouver, B.C., Canada  V6E 4L2
    Fones: (+1 604)  Data: 681-0670  FAX: 682-6160  Voice: 682-6659
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 13:36:16 GMT
From: rpj@beta.lanl.gov (Richard Jenks)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: AT&T Public Phone 2000
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 750, Message 11 of 13

That's my only real complaint -- it was great to have a place to plug
my modem into!
 

Rick Jenks, Staff Member       | Voice1   505-667-0912
Los Alamos National Laboratory | Voice2   503-493-2212
Mailstop K551                  | FAX      505-665-3167
Los Alamos, NM  87545  USA     | Internet rpj@lanl.gov
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 9:17:29 EDT
From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@BRL.MIL>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: N0X/N1N Exchanges and 1+ Dialing
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 746, Message 4 of 11

Notice that I changed N0N/N1N to N0X/N1X in the subject header.

[Moderator's Note: And note that I changed it back only so that Carl's
message would stay in continuity with the rest of the thread.  PAT]

You cited "1-818-xxxx, in-area, calling 818 exchange)" for Manhattan.
That is not the published calling method for this call.  Omit the
leading 1 and just use 818-xxxx.  The leading 1 is what notifies the
system that 818 is being used as an area code, not as an exchange (as
in 1-818-xxx-xxxx).

There is some discussion of dialing instructions at the head of the
archive file history.of.area.splits. The history.of.area.splits file
lists a case where the 1-818-xxxx vs. 1-818-xxx-xxxx scenario is
possible.  Such case is not in New York City but in Lancaster County,
Pa. (Denver and Adamstown).


[Moderator's Note: Carl Moore maintains the 'history of area code
splits' file in the Telecom Archives. (anonymous ftp lcs.mit.edu).  PAT]
Date: 26 Sep 92 21:14:48 GMT
From: gt6105a@prism.gatech.edu (Michael Brinkman)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Utility Meter Reading Switch
Organization: Georgia Tech, UPI National Champs
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 734, Message 4 of 13

The reason they came out with these glass meters that use infared to
communicate is for one they connection are protected but the main
reason is that no electrical conection has to be made.  So if there is
a gas leak, you don't have to plug a wire in and possibly make a
spark.  The units respond to commands by a light detector where you
can give commands by covering a spot and blocking the light or by the
IR spot.  A small IR sender reciever clamps onto the outside.


Cheers,

Michael (Beelz) Brinkman
Leave Mail at this Site or Internet: gt6105a@prism.gatech.edu
Beelz a.k.a. Brinkman, Michael G.  a.k.a. gt6105a@prism.gatech.edu
Georgia Institute of Technology
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 92 19:43:14 CDT
From: cybrspc!roy@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: AT&T Public Phone 2000
Organization: Villa CyberSpace, Minneapolis, MN
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 759, Message 2 of 14

egg@inuxy.att.com (Edwin G Green) writes:

> The Public Phone 2000, when equipped with a keyboard, can be (and
> almost always is) a Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD).

That makes me wish I had had the time to further explore the features.
I didn't notice a TDD option on the LAX or Salt Lake City phones, but
it may well have been offered from a menu page I didn't inspect.  A
pat on the back for AT&T.

You say "when equipped with a keyboard" ... are there installations
that do not include keyboards?  What might be the rationale?  (I have
only seen the keyboard-equipped model, and not in Minnesota.)


Roy M. Silvernail |+|  roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu
From: otis@MIAMI.rsmas.miami.edu (Otis Brown)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Internet White Pages
Date: 3 Oct 92 00:54:16 GMT
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 754, Message 6 of 13

PAT et al,

Having just tried to register in the White Pages, the following is the
result ...

Dear Internet User,

Sorry, but we prefer not to register Internet users in the whois
database unless they are administrators or contact points for domains,
networks, hosts, or ASNs.  This policy change has been recently
instituted per NSF instructions because, with millions of users on the
Internet, a single central directory is no longer feasible.  Instead,
local sites are encouraged to establish their own whois database.

If you are a valid point of contact for an Internet entity and must be
registered, please resubmit your data to us with a brief explanation.
If you need the user registration template, you may obtain it by
anonymous FTP from nic.ddn.mil.  It is in the netinfo directory,
filename user-template.txt.

Regards,

Registrar@nic.ddn.mil

                   --------------------

Otis Brown
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992  20:09:33 EDT
From: Paul Robinson <FZC@CU.NIH.GOV>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: The Smallest US Telephone Company
Reply-To: TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 748, Message 5 of 12

Here's a note I read once from before the breakup of AT&T.  Since I
don't know if it's been mentioned before I think I will anyway.

The smallest independent telephone company in the US is Buena Vista
Telephone Company of Florida which has only 34 subscribers.  33
Subscribers plus Walt Disney World.  The article didn't say so, but
the name "Buena Vista" makes me suspect that it's owned by the Disney
organization anyway.


Paul Robinson  TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM    Opinions not necessarily anyone else's.


[Moderator's Note: We've discussed Buena Vista here before, and yes,
it is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Disney organization, mainly
intended to provide phone service at the Florida operation. It is not
the smallest phone company however. There is (or was) a guy in
Colorado who owned a telco with *eight* subscribers. Does anyone
remember the name of that one?    PAT]
Date: 5 Oct 92 06:58:24 GMT
From: David E. Sheafer <nin15b0b@merrimack.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Non-Air Air-Phone/ (Cellular Roaming Cost in PEI)
Organization: Merrimack College, No. Andover, MA, USA
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 760, Message 10 of 12

In article <telecom12.753.12@eecs.nwu.edu>, cmwolf@mtu.edu
(CHRISTOPHER WOLF) writes:

> When I took the ferry across Lake Michigan from MI to WI this summer,
> there was a phone or two on board that looked like the phones on
> air-planes.

> How does this work being only 100ft off the ground, in the middle of a
> lake?

  When I took a ferry in Canada to Prince Edward Island, the phones
were cellular (IsleTel Cellular I believe) on the Ferry.

  As an aside, when I was on PEI and used my Cellphone, the roaming
costs were cheap, I had a couple of two and three-minute calls, each
call was billed for a total of $1.25 CND (not 1.25 /minute but per
call), and there was no daily charge.  By the way I'm a NYNEX/Boston
Customer, and was told that the charges would be 1.25/minute plus 3.00
per day.  So I'm not complaining.


David E. Sheafer
internet:  nin15b0b@merrimack.edu   or  uucp:      samsung!hubdub!nin15b0b
GEnie:     D.SHEAFER             Cleveland Freenet:    ap345
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 92 16:42:40 CST
From: Mike.Riddle@ivgate.omahug.org (Mike Riddle)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: SYSLAW: A Review
Reply-To: mike.riddle%inns@ivgate.omahug.org
Organization: Inns of Court, Papillion, NE
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 755, Message 10 of 12

                        SYSLAW, 2nd Edition
                 A Legal Guide for Online Services

First, an announcement:

> Newsgroups: misc.int-property
> From: elrose@well.sf.ca.us (Lance Rose)
> Subject: SysLaw, 2nd ed. - Legal Guide for Online Service Providers
> Date: Thu Oct  1 16:27:51 1992

>            NEW SYSLAW BOOK! MASSIVELY REVISED AND EXPANDED!

> SysLaw, Second Edition: The Legal Guide for Online Service
> Providers
>                     by Lance Rose, Esq., and Jonathan Wallace, Esq.

> SysLaw provides BBS sysops, network moderators and other online
> service providers with basic information on their rights and
> responsibilities, in a form that non-lawyers can easily understand.
> Subjects covered include the First Amendment, copyrights and
> trademarks, the user agreement, negligence, privacy, criminal law,
> searches and seizures, viruses and adult materials.  SysLaw not
> only explains the laws, it gives detailed advice enabling system
> operators to create the desired balance of user services, freedom,
> and protection from risk on their systems.

> SysLaw is available from PC Information Group, 800-321-8285 or 507-
> 452-2824, and located at 1126 East Broadway, Winona, MN 55987.  You
> may order by credit card or by mail.  Price is $34.95 plus $3.00
> shipping and (if applicable) sales tax.  Price is subject to change
> after January 1, 1993.  For additional information, please contact
> publisher Brian Blackledge at 800-321-8285.
 
Second: I have the book at my office, and (third?) have actually read
it.  Messrs. Rose and Wallace have done an excellent job in explaining
the law as applied to BBSes, including the places where the law is
"unsettled."

In the places where the law is unsettled, they do a good job
explaining the legal, social and sometimes moral considerations that a
court would consider if the question arose.  They sometimes tell you
what they think the result might be, or what they think it should be.
They caution at the start that until courts consider several cases,
and/or until we get appellate decisions, the users and operators incur
some degree of risk in engaging in certain activities, such as
XXX.GIF.
 
Overall, well worth the cost.


      <<<< insert standard disclaimer here >>>>
mike.riddle@inns.omahug.org   Nebraska Inns of Court
bc335@cleveland.freenet.edu   +1 402 593 1192 (Data)
Sysop of 1:285/27@Fidonet     3/12/24/9600 V.32/V.42bis
Ybbat (DRBBS) 8.9 v. 3.13 r.3
inns.omahug.org  +1 402 593 1192  (1:285/27.0)
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 09:21:37 -0700
From: rlm@indigo2.hac.com (Robert L. McMillin)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: U.S. Cable Television Re-Regulation
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 747, Message 5 of 14

In response to a missive by Bob_Frankston@frankston.com, our Moderator
notes:

> [Moderator's Note: You mention the {National Enquirer}, but IMHO, they
> do not hold a candle to {World Weekly News} which is the one I read
> for the honest and thorough reporting missing in my competitor Kay
> Graham's two ragsheets {The Washington Post} and News Weak.  PAT]

Having seen this, it surprises me that nobody else has mentioned
similar possiblities for the National People's Radio Weekend Edition
program -- namely, "Weakened Edition", which it frequently is.


Robert L. McMillin                     | Voice:    (310) 568-3555
Hughes Aircraft/Hughes Training, Inc.  | Fax:      (310) 568-3574
Los Angeles, CA                        | Internet: rlm@indigo2.hac.com


[Moderator's Note: Bravo!  I like it and shall remember it.   PAT]
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 15:06:11 -0700
From: mmt@redbrick.com (Maxime Taksar)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: What Does a DS-3 Circuit Terminate at?
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 734, Message 9 of 13

In article <telecom12.717.6@eecs.nwu.edu>, is written:

> I need to find out what's needed to route IP,IPX and possibly
> Appletalk over a DS-3 circuit to our local net.  We're a site based on
> Cisco AGS+ routers, and I'll ultimately need to terminate on one of
> them.

I'm almost positive that Cisco's now got, or will soon have, what
you're looking for.

> The T-3 Backbone of the Internet/NSFNet runs on IBM's RS/6000-based IP
> routers -- does anyone know if IBM is selling these commercially yet?

Nope.  The NSFnet runs on IBM PC/RT machines.  Yes, the horribly old,
relatively slow machines of years past.  This is the biggest
Internet-related scandal you can imagine: these routers couldn't
possible handle DS3 speeds.  In fact, when everything works, you're
lucky to get DS1 speeds.  However, the routers frequently fall back to
their T1 links anyway.

> What I need to know is what plugs into what to funnel a DS-3 circuit
> down to a campus Ethernet network in a way that uses the most
> available trunk bandwidth possible within a somewhat conservative
> budget.

Talk to Cisco.  If they don't have what you're looking for, they can
almost certainly point you in the right direction.

I don't have any vested interest in Cisco, I just think they make a
very good product.


Maxime Taksar   KC6ZPS   mmt@RedBrick.COM
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 9:21:22 EDT
From: pedregal%unreal@cs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Dialers That Also Store Numbers
Reply-To: pedregal@cs.umass.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 736, Message 5 of 10

Greetings. I am looking for sources to buy one of those pocket
diallers that look like a small calculator (they usually include one),
can store numbers (with associated alphanumeric info) and can
tone-dial those numbers. I have seen some (now discontinued) Sharp
models and recently a Seiko Instruments.

This particular one looked suitable: 150 16 or 20 digit numbers with
16 or so chars per number, plus other features like a passwd to lock
it, alpha-search, IXC prefix, calling card storage, etc, and it sold
for $40.  But the store ("The Good Guys") had only a broken demo left
and I was just visiting so I couldn't buy one.

I also remember seeing a Radio Shack one; I think it was worse (less
capacity, features, and bulkier) but am not sure.

It's interesting that there seems to be a large number of devices that
only _store_ the numbers, but few that actually dial them; at the
stores I checked they said there used to be more of those but most
were discontinued.  Strange, isn't it?

I'd appreciate pointers to mail-order stores where I can get one of
these (or even places in W Mass, Boston, NYC), as well as
recommendations or comments about particular models/brands. Of course,
if you own one of these and are willing to sell it to me, please let
me know.


Cristobal Pedregal Martin     pedregal@cs.umass.edu (internet)
Computer Science Department   UMass / Amherst, MA 01003