HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ldo@waikato.ac.nz (Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Waikato University)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: AppleShare query
Date: 8 Apr 92 17:15:52 +1200
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

In article <BEAR.92Apr7140238@godzilla.harlqn.co.uk>, bear@harlqn.co.uk
(Andy Edwards) makes some statements that I would like to qualify:

> You don't need to install AppleShare on a Quadra as you can only
> install & run System 7. File sharing is a permanent feature of System
> 7.

True, but System 7 file-sharing was never meant for heavy-duty use. It
has a limit of 10 simultaneous connections, for one thing. If you want
to run a dedicated server, I'm pretty sure you'll get measurably better
performance with AppleShare.

> AppleShare version 2 client side running under System 6 is compatible
> with System 7 file sharing...

True.

> NB we've been running an AppleShare v2 file server and have been
> accessing with a mixed network of AppleShare v2 clients & System 7
> file sharing clients. We have also AppleShare v2 clients accessing
> System 7 file sharing servers. This setup has been running for over a
> year now and we've had no problems!

We do pretty much the same thing, with a similar lack of problems. One
limitation you might notice is that using Finder 7's "Find" command to
an AppleShare v2 server is slow, because it has to do a full directory
tree search. AppleShare v3 (which I haven't got yet) should have the same
fast catalog search function that's built into System 7, so a System 7
client can do fast searches on that server.

Lawrence D'Oliveiro                       fone: +64-7-856-2889
Computer Services Dept                     fax: +64-7-838-4066
University of Waikato            electric mail: ldo@waikato.ac.nz
Hamilton, New Zealand    37^ 47' 26" S, 175^ 19' 7" E, GMT+13:00
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Clarification of posting (was Re: Power Key)
From: stanger@otago.ac.nz (Nigel Stanger)
Date: 9 Apr 92 13:15:18 +1300
Organization: University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

In article <aland.702710209@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu>, 
aland@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Alan D.) writes:
[...]
>>Nowhere does it claim that the REST of TuneUp's changes will remain in
>>effect.  I'd like to know, though, how to install something which
>>starts out as an init into the system so that it will remain installed
>>if I boot w/ extensions off...  Specifically, the PowerKey init.
> 
> So, the question still remains...  Is the method (Matt?) mentioned
> above a 'valid' way to permanantly install functionality into the
> System?  I know it was the "original" way, but lots have changed since
> then.
> 
> 	-=Alan

An interesting thing I've noticed about the Tuner: it doesn't
have the file type INIT, like others do. Instead it has the
type/creator scri/toon. It _does_ contain an INIT resource
though. At a guess I would say that this may have something to do
with it's startup behaviour.

-- 
See ya
                                Nigel.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nigel Stanger,                  Internet: stanger@otago.ac.nz
University of Otago,            Phone: +64 3 479-8179
Dunedin, NEW ZEALAND.           Fax:   +64 3 479-8311
Recursion (n): see recursion
From: rsfinn@concerto.lcs.mit.edu (Russell S. Finn)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Tuneup 1.1.1 & missing folders...fix or cludge?
Date: 14 Apr 92 22:28:09 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: MIT Laboratory for Computer Science

In article <8189@sun13.scri.fsu.edu>, stricher@masig3.ocean.fsu.edu (Char Aznabul) writes:
|> Thomas Alan Akins writes:
|> + For the TuneUp, the Installer is a great waste of time.  All you
|> + have to do is put the TuneUp extension in the extensions folder
|> + and replace any other pertinent files that already exist on your
|> + system.
|> 
|> This assumes, of course, that the Installer is not adding
|> additional resources on-the-fly to either Finder or the System
|> files. Or even the Tuneup extension.  Anyone in the know care to
|> comment?

Well, normally this would be an important consideration; as it
happens, though, in the case of Tune-Up, the Installer really *is*
unnecessary.  Quoted without permission from the April 13 MacWEEK:

"Alternatively, users can skip the Installer and merely drag the new
Tuner file to their System folder, [System 7 product marketing manager
Michael] Buhr said.  Apple had not originally planned to offer an
installer script for the Tune-Ups but added one after testing showed
that only 40 percent of users could successfully drag-copy a file to
their System folders, Buhr said."

Pretty scary.  Maybe there's something to this "Macintoshes make
people dumb" theory after all...  :-)

By the way, another posting suggested that you could drag the Tune-Up
Items folder itself to your System folder, and the "helping hand"
would take care of putting things in the right place; I haven't tried
this, though.

-- Russell S. Finn
rsfinn@lcs.mit.edu
From: rlvd_cif@troi.cc.rochester.edu (Robert Levandowski)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Apple's worst current piece of software
Date: 6 Apr 92 16:26:52 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <TRSNYDER.92Apr5225536@queen.mcs.Drexel.edu> trsnyder@mcs.Drexel.edu (Bob Snyder) writes:

>>>>>> In article <4APR199218550147@ochre.mgh.harvard.edu>,
>>>>>> burglin@ochre.mgh.harvard.edu (Thomas Burglin) writes:

>Thomas> Doesn't the the system 7 tools disk with that contains the HD
>Thomas> utilities have a complete system 7 on it? I haven't tried it, but
>Thomas> it sure looks that way, so that you can run the HD utilties from
>Thomas> floppy in case your HD dies...
>Thomas> Thomas Burglin

>Nope.  It's System 6, last I checked.

The System 7.0.1 Disk Tools HD floppy has a minimal System 7.0.1 on it.

--Rob Levandowski
  Computer Interest Floor / University of Rochester
From: long@mcntsh.enet.dec.com (Rich Long)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: 16 color Apple: well, sometimes...
Date: 13 Apr 92 14:54:43 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


 Hi, I've got a weird problem with the apple in the menu bar. On a IIci, with
 7.0.1, and 1.1.1 Tuneup, switching to 16 colors makes the apple black; on a
 IIfx with the same system, the apple stays in color in 16 color mode.

 I know the IIci has "system software for the IIci" (NOT minimal); I'm not
 sure what the IIfx is running in that regard (is there a way to tell?)

 Any ideas on what's causing this? Minor, I know...but still odd.

Richard C. Long			long@mcntsh.enet.dec.com
			  -or-	...!decwrl!mcntsh.enet.dec.com!long   		
			  -or-	long%mcntsh.dec@decwrl.enet.dec.com
From: djz@cbnews.cb.att.com (danny.zerkel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: MAC Trivia
Date: 7 Apr 92 15:02:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: cbnews.1992Apr7.150218.21698
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <D2150035.0c5ufz@outpost.SF-Bay.org> peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce) writes:
>
>In article <wdrvN3q00ioEQ2PERL@andrew.cmu.edu> (comp.sys.mac.system), mg4s+@andrew.cmu.edu (Marissa Gonzalez) writes:
>> Is there any meaning behind the Mac "SE", "si","ci","fx" etc...
>> 
>> No one around here seems to know and I've never run across any explaination.
>
>Conjecture on my part, but that stops few on the net!
>
>Mac II		Simply a second generation Macintosh
>Mac IIx	A Mac II with a 68030 in it.
>Mac IIcx	  " in a compact box.
>Mac IIci	A compact Mac II with internal video (but could have been
>		cxi to follow the above rules, but that's probably too long)
>Mac IIfx	A "f"aster Mac IIx.
>Mac IIsi	A "s"porty (???!) Mac II with internal video.

It seems to me that if you follow the automotive industry then:
c = compact
s = subcompact!

So:
Mac IIsi	A subcompact Mac II with internal video!

Good thing the USENET can solve these pressing social issues so easily :-).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Danny J. Zerkel, AT&T Bell Labs, Columbus, OH
 'What's the point of going abroad if you're just another tourist!'
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
From: Howard Moskovitz <howard@locus.com>
Subject: Re: Printing Problem with System 7 Tuneup
Organization: Locus Computing Corp.
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.0
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 19:24:20 GMT



I left out one piece of critical information in my last post...
I checked my available memory under finder each time I got
the dialog. Each time I had at least 2 megs avaliable in the
largest free block. The only thing I can think of is that maybe
memory is fragmented and PrintMonitor thinks so,
but Finder doesn't think so.

Howard
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
From: florian@convex.csd.uwm.edu (Chris Florian)
Subject: Mac Problems
Originator: florian@convex.csd.uwm.edu
Organization: UW-Milwaukee: Computing Services Division
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 13:53:35 GMT

	Okay, don't laugh...

	I have a mac, model: M0001W (That's a first generation Mac
	expanded to 512k.)  

	The problem I am having is that I keep getting System Error
	ID=2 and ID=3.  This may just be because the mac I have is
	just not capable of running the programs I ask of it.  But
	the programs I am trying are old enough that they should run.
	Even the ones that came with the mac often crash, for example
	Microsoft Multiplan.  Any Ideas?

	Secondly,  I have been having a real problem getting a
	communication package to work on this thing?  I had heard that
	there are some non-standard pin configurations on the original
	macs' modem connection.  If anyone knows of a program that
	would work on this mac, and where to find it, please let me
	know.

	My wife and I received it as a gift, and it IS better
	than a typewriter, and some games do work, so...

	Just remember what your mother told you, "If you haven't got
	something nice to say, SHUT UP!"
From: vkwx@vax5.cit.cornell.edu (Ed Swierk)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: What is Discipline?
Date: 14 Apr 92 14:34:53 EDT
Distribution: comp
Organization: Cornell University

In article <winer.703191000@husc8>,
winer@husc8.harvard.edu (Adam Winer) writes: 
> Does anyone out there know exactly what Discipline does?  I downloaded
> it from ftp.apple.com.  It appears to be some program debugging tool,
> but I have no idea exactly how it works, or where I can find additional
> instructions on it (beyond the scant information that came with it).

According to the Discipline chapter of MacsBug Reference and Debugging Guide
(Addison-Wesley, $22.95),

	Discipline is a set of routines that a debugger calls to test the
	validity of parameters passed to a User Interface Toolbox or
	operating system routine and to test the validity of parameters
	passed back to your application by that routine. [The chapter in
	this book] tells you how to install Discipline, how you determine
	which tests Discipline should use to test parameters, and how you
	work with discipline during application development.

	Discipline is not a stand-alone tool; it must always be used with
	a resident debugger.

I hope that answers your question.

-- 
                Ed Swierk
       Cornell University
vkwx@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
From: j-norstad@nwu.edu (John Norstad)
Subject: Re: SpeedBeep dead with new Disenfecant
Organization: Northwestern University
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 17:38:45 GMT

In article <1992Apr5.200718.28820@muddcs.claremont.edu>, sgruby@jarthur.claremont.edu (Scott Allen Gruby) writes:
> 
> In article <1992Apr5.154102.2456@otago.ac.nz> stanger@otago.ac.nz (Nigel Stanger) writes:
> >In article <1992Apr1.122432.45@sleepy.bmd.trw.com>, 
> >auerbach@sleepy.bmd.trw.com writes:
> >> I'm having a problem with SpeedBeep since I started using Disenfectant 2.7.  
> >[...]
> >
> >SpeedBeep died when version 2.6 of Disinfectant came out. I
> >believe the author of SpeedBeep has been in contact with John
> >Norstad (author of Disinfectant) about this, and there is nothing
> >that can be done about it, other than not using Disinfectant.
> >
> >-- 
> >See ya
> 
> I don't know what kinds of problems you are having with the two programs,
> but I am running Speed Beep 2.0.6 (The latest version) and Disinfectant 2.7.1
> (init) and have not experienced any problems. Even when I run the Disinfectant
> program, nothing out of the ordinary happens. Maybe there is a conflict
> with another init or program.

The problem was with Speed Beep 2.0 and earlier versions. Any version of
Speed Beep LATER THAN 2.0 should work fine with the Disinfectant INIT.

I forgot to mention this in the "Known Problems" section of the Disinfectant
online manual. I will add a brief paragraph in the next version.

John Norstad
Academic Computing and Network Services
Northwestern University
j-norstad@nwu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
From: kettler@mitme5.mit.edu (KETTLER, THOMAS R.)
Subject: Re: MAC Trivia
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Organization: MIT Lab for Nuclear Science
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 17:02:00 GMT

In article <bill.702651370@chaos.cs.umn.edu>, bill@chaos.cs.umn.edu                       writes...
>peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce) writes:
> 
> 
>>In article <wdrvN3q00ioEQ2PERL@andrew.cmu.edu> (comp.sys.mac.system), mg4s+@andrew.cmu.edu (Marissa Gonzalez) writes:
>>> Is there any meaning behind the Mac "SE", "si","ci","fx" etc...
>>> 
>>> No one around here seems to know and I've never run across any explaination.
> 
>>Conjecture on my part, but that stops few on the net!
> 
>>The two Macs with "i" in their names (ci,si) both have internal video.
>>So the it could mean internal video.
> 
>>The "c" Macs (cx,ci) are compact Mac II's (compared to the original
>>Mac II that is).
> 
>>The "x" started with the Mac IIx which was a Mac II with an 68030
>>in it.  This seems to have continued with cx and fx.
> 
>>So with the above rules you get:
> 
>>Mac II		Simply a second generation Macintosh
>>Mac IIx		A Mac II with a 68030 in it.
>>Mac IIcx				"				 in a compact box.
>>Mac IIci	A compact Mac II with internal video (ut could have been
>>				cxi to follow the above rules, but that's probably too long)
>>Mac IIfx	A "f"aster Mac IIx.
>>Mac IIsi	A "s"porty (???!) Mac II with internal video.
> 
>>Mac LC		Obviously Low Cost color Mac.
> 
>>I don't knwo where Mac SE came from.  But Plus is easy (follows in the
>>Apple II/Plus foot steps).  As is SE/30 (SE with a 68030 - this of
>>course should have been a Mac SEx, but wasn't for obvious reasons).

SE stood for system expansion since it was the first Mac to have an expansion
slot on the mother board for accelerators or other things. This is also why 
most of the accelerators until recently were designed for the SE.

> 
>>Classic is pure marketing speak.
> 
>>When they upgraded the Classic and LC to use 68030 processors they
>>tacked II onto the end, not meaning a Mac II class Mac (Mac II = NuBus),
>>but rather a second generation Classic or LC.
> 
>>The newer machines have a new naming convention consisting of a
>>family name plus a number.  This gives us PowerBook 100,140,170 and 
>>Quadra 700, 900.
> 
>>Then there was the Macintosh Portable.  I have no idea why they named
>>it this way!
> 
>there was an article in macuser? macworld? that discussed this very thing
>not to long ago. if i can find it i'll post, if someone else does?
>but as i recall from the article the above definitions are pretty close.
> 
>--
>bill@chaos.cs.umn.edu
From: richards@eng.auburn.edu (Eric J. Richards)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Legal Question:  PostScript file distribution OK?
Keywords: PostScript Legal Sue
Date: 7 Apr 92 19:30:03 GMT
Organization: Auburn University Engineering


My question is this:

   Can PostScript files generated from a Macintosh application (system 7) be
   distributed freely?

When I'm done with my thesis, I want to distribute it, along with PostScript
documentation.  I'm using Word 5 to do that, so I decided to just save the
"Print..." to a PostScript file.

Is there anything in this file that _can't_ be redistributed?  For instance,
the Apple Dictionary.

What if I use a type 1 font and it includes it in the PostScript file for
downloading.  Is it a no-no to distribute this, too?

I'm going to distribute my thesis for free, so there isn't any charging for
the PostScript file.  I just thought it would be handy to use the Macintosh
for creating quality documentation, instead of saying "To hang with WYSIWYG,
break out TeX!"

So, is it kosher?

(Replies to me will be summarized in, say, a week and 1/2).

_________________________________________________________________
\ Eric Richards, Auburn University   "Money can't buy happiness. \
 \   InterNet:                        Then again, happiness can't \
\\\       richards@eng.auburn.edu     buy government insured CD's."\
 \\\                                        -- David Addison        \
  \\\________________________________________________________________\
   \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
From: news@netnews.upenn.edu (USENET News System)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Problem with Tuneup 1.1
Date: 9 Apr 92 21:00:28 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <aland.702845141@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu>, aland@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Alan D.) writes:
> 
> Does anyone know what the problem is with Tuneup 1.1?

It has been withdrawn. Enclosed is an article in comp.sys.mac.announce
regarding its withdrawal
>From: werner@rascal.ics.utexas.edu (Werner Uhrig)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.announce
Subject: Tuner 1.1 has been recalled; expect 1.1.1 soon
Date: 9 Apr 92 09:04:25 GMT
Expires: +30 days
Reply-To: werner@rascal.ics.utexas.edu (Werner Uhrig)
Followup-To: poster
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


	I have no idea what is wrong; as is usually the case (and it alarms
	me this should be so, sometimes), our friends at Apple are mostly
	hesitant to announce bugs (and 'withdrawel symptoms') with the same
	speed and delight as "glorious victories" over "adversities" ... ;-)

	given that in the past even file-consuming bugs have only been admitted
	to when "force" (of making it public anyway) was applied, I am
	unwilling to assume that it is "just a minor, cosmetic problem".
	Stay tuned; fortunately good people at Apple also would like to see
	this resolved with due speed and dilligence (is that a contradiction?!? ;-)
From: wawebb@athena.mit.edu (Wyatt A Webb)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: How to convince Mac+ it has 6-meg of RAM ?????????
Date: 9 Apr 92 13:38:43 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Um, I hope you didn't already purchase the RAM.  The story is that the
Mac Plus simply will not address more than 4 Meg RAM.  Period.  It is
hardwired that way.

The only way to increase above that limit is to buy an accelerator which
allows you to add more SIMMS.

Good Luck!

	-Wyatt
--

** MIT Class of '92 (My thesis is due when?)
** MIT IS MicroComputer Consultant
From: k.a.cooper@lut.ac.uk (Keith Cooper)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: 8*24gc and Quicktime
Summary: Quicktime init for 8*24gc
Keywords: 8*24gc , Quicktime
Date: 6 Apr 92 11:05:27 GMT
Organization: HUSAT Research Inst.  UK

On the most recent Quicktime CD I have found an extra init that seems to try
and offload some
of Quicktimes efforts to the 8*24GC board. Unfortunately this causes
compression of still images
to break up into stripes. This is on a IIfx running 7.0.1.

Does anyone know anything about this 'extra facility' (:-)
From: smanelis@sugaku.claremont.edu (Scott Manelis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: (Q) - starting Classic on ROM O/S
Date: 5 Apr 92 21:52:10 GMT
Article-I.D.: muddcs.1992Apr5.215210.345
Distribution: comp.sys.mac.system
Organization: Harvey Mudd College

In article <1992Apr3.153954.22871@informix.com> robertw@informix.com (Robert  
Weinberg) writes:
> Am I crazy (strike that) or do I remember that one can make a Classic start  
up  
> on its ROM-based operating system?
> 
> If so, my questions are:
> 
> What are the keys that need to be held down at startup?
> 

If you hold down Command-Option-X-O (thats Oh) you will boot from a ROM disk.   
This disk has the chooser and Control panels with Brightness, General and  
StartUp Device (which can be set to the built in ROM disk which then loads  
every time until set back to the Hard Drive.)

> Does this work on a Classic II, as well?
> 

It doesn't seem to, but Apple might have changed the keys.

> What system is built into the ROM?
> 

The finder is 6.x, yes x.  The system is 6.0.3.
From: holland@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU (Todd Holland)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Tuneup 1.1.1 is at ftp.apple.com !!
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:22:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: talon.1992Apr15.182223.17237
Organization: Oregon State University, College of Oceanography

In article <23023@goofy.Apple.COM> nerm@apple.com (Dean Yu) writes:
>
>  For the record, and so all the second guessing will stop, the ONLY reason
>there is a TuneUp 1.1.1 at all is because 1.1 was compiled with the wrong
>version of a header file, causing the "Application Assassin" to crash.   This
>is the code that brings up a dialog suggesting an application to quit to allow
>another application to run in low memory situations.  Nothing else was changed
>between 1.1 and 1.1.1.
>
OK, well here's something that "seems" different.
(Note, I don't really know if this happened w/ TuneUp 1.1
or earlier, it just seems relevant)

Configuration:
System 7.01, TuneUp 1.1.1, IIsi 5/80, Virtual Memory Off

Example:
When I boot with extensions off (hold down shift key)
"About this system" gives 1,070K.

Open Mathematica (default size 5M) gets the usual
"3,692K available, open it using available?" message.
I say no thanks.

When I boot normally (Disinfectant & Drive7)
"About this system" gives 1,446K and the
circle after 7.0.1 appears.

Open Mathematica as before and it loads!!!
ie there is no warning message.
I proceed unknowingly and run out of memory.

So why does the warning go away when I have even less
memory to work with?  Can anyone else replicate this
as I haven't tried getting rid of extensions (other than tuner)
yet.

Todd Holland
holland@oce.orst.edu
Coastal Imaging Lab
(503) 737-3251
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
From: barry@playfair.Stanford.EDU (Barrett P. Eynon)
Subject: Re: Printing Postscript files in System 7
Organization: Stanford University
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 07:41:14 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.214745.25965@morrow.stanford.edu> barry@playfair.Stanford.EDU (Barrett P. Eynon) writes:
>I only need to print raw postscript files occasionally, so I only just
>noticed that SendPS 2.0 does not work with System 7....

Don't you just hate people who post questions and then answer them themselves?
The newest version (7.1) of the Apple Laserwriter Utility program, available 
from ftp.apple.com in dts/mac/sys.soft/imaging/laserwriter-utility.hqx, 
includes postscript downloading among it's several functions, and it works
fine with System 7.

>So, I'm open to suggestions. Thanks in advance.
No, thank you! :) (Actually, thanks to Apple for both this handy utility and 
the ftp service to get it from).

Cheers.
--
Barry Eynon
barry@playfair.stanford.edu
From: niski@reed.edu (Joe Niski)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: MAC Trivia
Date: 13 Apr 92 19:05:04 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Apr13.190504.24180
Reply-To: niski@reed.edu (Joe Niski)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR

i always thought "SE" stood for "Slightly Enhanced" ;-)

--
Joe Niski				niski@reed.edu
Computer User Services
Reed College, Portland, OR 97202	503-777-7525
Macintosh is the OS i love to hate, UNIX is the OS i hate to love.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
From: aland@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Alan D.)
Subject: Re: Suitcase 2.0 on PowerBooks
Reply-To: aland@cs.brandeis.edu
Organization: As little as possible
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 05:23:00 GMT

arie@eecs.umich.edu (Arie Covrigaru) writes:

>Did anyone experience problems with Suitcase 2.0 on the PowerBooks?
>It crashes on my configuration, system 7.0.1, Tune-Up 1.1, PowerBook 170.

I noticed a crashing problem when helping someone configure their
PB170.  The problem went away when I removed the Fax extensions from
the Sys. Folder (subfolders).

	-=Alan
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system