HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:19:06 PDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         DUNES@SJSUVM1.BITNET
Subject:      16/4 SWITCHABLE TR CARDS

THANKS TO ALL WHO RESPONDED TO MY QUERY.  THE TWO BRANDS RECOMMENDED
(ESPECIALLY FOR MCA CARDS) WERE IBM AND MADGE.  SUPPOSEDLY BOTH COME
WITH A DIAGNOSTIC UTILITY THAT WILL ALLOW IDENTIFICATION OF A BEACONING
NODE WITHOUT DISCONNECTING MAUS, ETC.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 17:01:34 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Glen Jula <julag@TACOM-EMH165.ARMY.MIL>
Subject:      Is this possible??
X-To:         NOVELL%SUVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

We have an individual who has been to a seminar and believes the following can
be accomplished.  I don't see how!!??

Novell Servers users (client PCs) communicating with VAX and Unix hosts
requiring little or NO memory from the client, possibly thru some sort of
Gateway.  Also, Vax users on terminal servers telnetting or FTP'ing into
Novell Servers.
Don't ask me why he wants to do the latter.....

Thanks for any replys.

George Russ
russg@citadel.bitnet
russg@citadel.edu

This is possible!!!

At our installation we have PC's hooked up to our LAN. We also have
UNIX hosts which are accesible through the LAN via the PC.

With regards to FTP'g, it has been our experience that the connection
doesn't hold that long if you just use the 'LAN' available software.

However, we discovered that UNIX based hosts tended to hold on to the
connections better/longer and the way we perform our FTP's
(particularly for large data files) is to log into our LAN, link up to
a UNIX host and login and then TELNET to the site do what we have to
do and if we need the data on the PC we transfer from UNIX to PC.
It may seem a long route to go, but in the long run it has been a time
saver for us.

                            GLEN P. JULA
                            US ARMY TACOM
                       WARREN, MI 48397-5000
                    julag@tacom-emh165.army.mil

                    COMM: (313) 574-5185/5488
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Envelope-to: novell@suvm.bitnet
Date-warning: Date header was inserted by HUSKY1.STMARYS.CA
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 09:31:00 ADT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         jaberback@HUSKY1.STMARYS.CA
Subject:      Novell 3 and Macintosh

To all you Novell gurus,

Sorry if this has already been addressed on this listserv, but my excuse is
that I am not a member of this list.  OK, here goes...

We're currently running a 486 Novell 3.11 server with 32 MB of RAM. We've
got about 150 PC users on this server.  We're thinking of adding 100 Mac
user connections as well. However, our Macs (old Mac Pluses) reside on
LocalTalk and will remain on LocalTalk, thus will have to go out through
gateways (EtherRoute, FastPath, etc.) to access the server. Each router
will handle between 15 and 20 Macs. These Macs are used in scheduled
Macintosh classes, where the users all basically launch the same programs
at the same time. Our director would like to free up all the Mac servers
running AppleShare currently in use and replace them with the one 486
server on ethernet. As it is now, performance in the Mac labs is *just*
acceptable; I wouldn't want to make any drastic changes that are going to
degrade Mac performance and cause more problems in our Mac labs.

Now the questions-

1] During the heavy usage periods of our server, will the extra Mac traffic
degrade performance for the PC users? Will heavy PC usage degrade
performance for the Macs?

2] Will simultaneous calls to the server from the Macs cause bottlenecks at
the routers?

3] Are we better off staying with AppleShare on a LocalTalk Mac server
(that's our present configuration, where each server serves about 20 Macs)?
Will we get better performance this way?  Or perhaps will Novell be able to
outperform dedicated Mac servers?

Please respond directly to me.  Any information will be extremely helpful.
Many thanks for your help.

===========================================================================
Joy Aberback-Microcomputer Coordinator-jaberback@husky1.stmarys.ca
Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

          I haven't lost my mind...it's backed up on disk somewhere
===========================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:      UK.AC.QUB.V2;  8 APR 92 13:48:28 BST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 13:49:00 GMT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         GRG1678@VAX2.QUEENS-BELFAST.AC.UK
Subject:      Re: IPX/NETX for Windows 3.1

You can get generation files for the Intel pdipx.com from
 splicer.cba.hawaii.edu(128.171.17.7) in the novell/drivers directory by the
 name `intel.zip' (not to be confused with `intelpd.zip' which is the executable
 itself). There are two
files, sipx.obj and sipx.lan. Put them on a floppy drive labelled `lan_drv_001'
 (I hope the underscore characters between the words come out in all mail
 messages -that's what they are meant to be anyway!) and run wsgen or shgen as
 usual.

Tony Sheehan
grg1678@143.117.1.89

Queen's University, Belfast
Northern Ireland
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: @NOVELL
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 16:15:00 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         DBRANTON@HUBIO2.HARVARD.EDU
Subject:      Netwire NOVLIB
X-To:         NOVELL@SUVM.ACS.SYR.EDU

I have seen various references in messages here to downloading files from
anonymous FTP, Compuserve, etc., but often in such abbreviated form that
I can't really tell what the FTP address really is.  Could someone please
tell me what the addresses are for the best Anonymous FTP sites for Novell
files and updates thereof.
    Dan Branton
    BRANTON@HUSC3.HARVARD.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: boyles@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Ernie Boyles)
Subject: The Mylex binding Multiple protocols
Reply-To: boyles@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Ernie Boyles)
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 17:50:07 GMT



Has any one using the Mylex LNE390A had any problems binding multiple  
protocols (IPX/SPX, Appletalk).  Mylex admits they have some problems but  
says it will work.

Please respond to,

Ernie Boyles
Ernie.Boyles@Rose-Hulman.Edu
From: lwei@pollux.usc.edu (Liming Wei)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: CNE student Kits
Followup-To: bit.listserv.novell
Date: 15 Apr 1992 21:28:27 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: ca
NNTP-Posting-Host: pollux.usc.edu
Keywords: CNE, certified netware engineer

I'd like to buy or lease (say $50 - $150/day/book) the books
used in the CNE courses. 
 
If you are interested, please send me an email message to,

  lwei@usc.edu


Thanks,
Liming
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Repository: MASTER
Originating-Client: ipswitch
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 12:34:59 -0400
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         ipswitch!hub.ipswitch.com!roger@URSA-MAJOR.SPDCC.COM
Subject:      re: Micom/Recal Interlan TCP Server product: feedback wanted.
X-To:         suvm@hub.ipswitch.com
X-cc:         laknerb@citadel.edu
              message of Tue, 14 Apr 1992 14:11:00 EST

>As an alternative to loading a full blown terminal emulation package with
>drivers, someone has recommended the TCP Server product which runs on a NW
>server and works pretty well as a IPX <-> TCPIP gateway (ie FTP, TELNET, etc.).
>This enables machines with little extra memory to live in the big TCPIP world
>without the software and added memory.  Any feedback, alternatives will be
>greatly appreciated.....
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>        Bill Lakner                     laknerb@citadel.edu
>        Network Support                 laknerb@citadel.bitnet
>        The Citadel, Charleston, SC

Racal's TCP Server (now sold by NCM) does accomplish what you describe,
though the gateway runs on an OS/2 PC, not the 3.11 server.  Our Catipult
NetWare-TCP/IP gateway does much the same thing, though ours uses standard
interface cards and Racals uses their own intelligent card to run TCP/IP.
Both products support a range of TCP/IP applications.  All NetWare users
share one IP address and there is no client installation.  We're in the
process of introducing NFS client support as well.

Roger C. Greene                580 Main St., Reading, MA 01867
Ipswitch, Inc.                (617) 942-0621
Internet: roger@ipswitch.com        Fax: (617) 942-0823
Compuserve: 70744,2404
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 15:33:03 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Glen Jula <julag@TACOM-EMH165.ARMY.MIL>
Subject:      Need a Utility
X-To:         hoeck@HAPPY.COLORADO.EDU, NOVELL%SUVM.BITNET@pucc.Princeton.EDU,
              bstring@mainz-emh2.army.mil

where can I get a utility like Lan Assist ?

...Greg

--
      ---------------------------------------------------------------
       Gregory A. Hoeck  University of Colorado @ Colorado Springs
               HOECK@uccs.edu        HOECK@colospgs.bitnet
       I have been a "ham" all my life, now I'm licensed. * KB0BEE *
      ---------------------------------------------------------------


	I like one who's intelligent and sure of herself, who I can
	talk with and get something back, but the most important
	thing of all...she has to laugh at my jokes.

						Riker, in "The Outcast"

Do you have any other STAR TREK/ NEXT GENERATION quotes down as well
as you got this one??

(but the most important thing of all is that she has to laugh at my
jokes).


                            GLEN P. JULA
                            US ARMY TACOM
                       WARREN, MI 48397-5000
                    julag@tacom-emh165.army.mil

          COMM: (313) 574-5185/5488
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"novell@suvm.acs.syr.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 08:28:00 -0500
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         CTRIBBET@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU
Subject:      Novell Administration Books
X-To:         novell@suvm.acs.syr.edu

Is there a "must have" or "consensus" best book for beginning
3.11 netware administrators?

Ctribbet@IndyVax.Iupui.Edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: lam@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Ken Lam)
Subject: How Much memory per unit diskspace?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 20:51:43 GMT

I know what NOVELL recommends, but I don't think that most users are loading
68MB of memory in a server which is mounting 2GB of disk with namespaces.

Anyone have suggestions(from experience preferred).

Ken Lam
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ken Lam
SSQL Network Administrator                                  klam@uiucvmd(bitnet)
Manager, System Services                          lam@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu(Internet)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:08:24 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2
From:         Kaveh <NZPPAT01@SIVM.BITNET>
Subject:      No Subject

From: Kaveh

For your printing problem after removing the guest password.

What you need to do is have an id on both servers with identical passwords
if you do not want a guest account.  If you are attaching through another
server, Novell tries first to log you in with the original userid and
password, if it does not find this on the second server, it will try
to log you in with the guest id.  If you are running from menus, there are
ways of logging someone in transparently (such as login username so that
username has no password) then capturing the printer and then logging out,
a big hassle).  I recommend keeping guest id or mirroring bindery info
on both servers.

Phyl Hirschel
National Zoological Park, Washington DC - USA
BITNET: NZPPAT01@SIVM   (202) 673-4869
(Standard Disclaimers Apply)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Organization: Potsdam College of the STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK (SUNY)
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 16:50:00 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         CONLONMP@SNYPOTVA.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Why don't replace IPX with TCP/IP ?

Date sent:


>
>    Can anyone tell me the differences between IPX(SPX) and TCP(UDP)/IP?
>The "LAN Workplace for DOS" and "NetWare NFS" want to integrate NetWare
>and TCP/IP base machine. But I wonder why Novell don't replace IPX with
>TCP/IP?
>
>    I use "NetWare NFS" in our Lab. It work very well. And I use NCSA
>with packet driver for our PCs. Recently I try to use ODI driver and "LAN
>Workplace for DOS". Both "NetWare NFS" and "LAN Workplace for DOS" are
>good products. But I cannot understand why Novell don't use TCP/IP as their
>major network protocol? Are there any good reasons for Novell to insist
>on using IPX(SPX)?
>
JJ--
     One reason is historical.  When Novell developed Netware, TCP/IP
was not used as commonly as it is today, and it was used mostly on long-haul
(wide-area) networks.  Novell developed IPX for local area networks.

     A second reason is for competition.  If they use a standard protocol,
users could buy upgrades and services from other vendors.  The only reason we
are continually fighting with packet drivers, ODI, NDIS, etc. is to get around
the incompatibility vendors build into their products so that we cannot
(easily) upgrade with products from other vendors.

     There is no reason that Novell could not re-write their upper layers
(NETX) to talk to a TCP/IP transport layer and internet layer.  I think that
users should be demanding this of them.

--Mike

Michael P. Conlon               Computer & Info. Sciences Dept.
                                Potsdam College of S.U.N.Y., Potsdam, N.Y. 13676
Bitnet: conlonmp@snypotvx       Internet: conlonmp@snypotvx.BITNET
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL8]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 16:55:43 MDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         fhammond@NMSU.EDU
Subject:      Re: Mac network at a crawl
X-To:         NOVELL%SUVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
              92 9:23 am

Replace the NOTIFY init with an older or newer one.

I had the same problem.

Good Luck.

Forrest Hammond
>
> Fellow netters,
>
> I've installed NW4MAC not to long ago, and just the other day I finished
> installing all of the MAC utilities in each of my 20 machines on the net:
> notify, message, print queues, UAM and rights.  Not soon after I installed
> these inits, I've been receiving complaints that the network is slooow. At
> random times, it looks like the machine freezes for about 5-10 seconds.  Un-
> doubtably this has annoyed all the students using these machines.  My question
> is, does anybody know why this is occuring? If so, is there a cure?
>
> B.T.W. - In my autoexec.ncf I have  LOAD AFP ENCRYPT, and the machines also
> freeze when running applications of the hard disk.
>
> T.I.A.
>
> : Michael Fanara
> : Computer Support Specialist III
> : Yale School of Management
> : Mikef@YaleVM.Bitnet
> : Mikef@YaleVM.Ycc.Yale.Edu (Internet)
> : Mikef@homey.som.yale.edu (Internet)
>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Sat, 11 Apr 1992 15:33:33 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Larry.H.Bradley@NRC.CA
Subject:      Re: Guest account removal and printing
              11 Apr 1992 15:01:09 GMT from <weber@RHRK.UNI-KL.DE>

I just went through that hoop here ... management said "remove guest
accounts". I said "Why?". They said "Security", whereupon I said
"Let's discuss this security issue ..."

It is quite possible to set up the GUEST account so that even if
people log in, they can't do anything.

1. Set disk quota so GUEST can't use much.
2. Remove GUEST from ALL groups, and then just assign whatever
trustee rights are need (e.g. to sys:public).

Management is now happy (or as happy as management ever is). Until
the next time, of course.


*------------------------------------+----------------------*
|Larry Bradley                       |    LARRY@VM.NRC.CA   |
|Communications Manager              | Larry.Bradley@NRC.CA |
|National Research Council of Canada |    LARRY@NRCVM01     |
|Networks Branch                     |                      |
|M60, Montreal Road                  | (613)993-0240        |
|Ottawa, Canada  K1A 0R6             | FAX:(613) 954-2561   |
*------------------------------------+----------------------*
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: novell@suvm.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"novell@suvm.bitnet"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 21:29:00 NZST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was BAIRD2@ONO.LINCOLN.AC.NZ
From:         J.Baird@ONO.LINCOLN.AC.NZ
Subject:      Re: Guest account removal and messages

>From: AMANL@COLUMBIA.DSU.EDU
>
>We were more concerned about obscene or annoying messages sent to
>people with the send command.  We could of moved or removed the send
>command, but many students have local copies, so we do not have
>GUEST accounts.

Removing the GUEST account is unlikely to solve this problem. Your more
enterprising students will have an earlier version of session.exe which
allows sending of anonymous messages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   John Baird                           Internet:   J.Baird@ono.lincoln.ac.nz
   Senior Computer Consultant           CompuServe: 75360,35
   Centre for Computing & Biometrics    Phone:      (64) (3) 325-2811
   Lincoln University                   Fax:        (64) (3) 325-2944
   Canterbury
   New Zealand
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: JRD
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 16:26:00 MDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Joe Doupnik <JRD@USU.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Need help designing Novell system

>What I am doing:
>Setting up a ten station LAN to run under Novell. It will run off
>a 486-50Mhz machine. I want to use PC's as workstations. It will
>also have a laser printer connected to the system, one modem for
>use with PC-Anywhere, and several dot-matrix printers and receipt
>printers tied to specific terminals.
>
>Questions:
>1> Does this make sense? I think it does.
        Sort of.
>2> Can a printer be connected to a specific terminal, or must it be
>tied to the network to be used by the terminal while the terminal
>is logged into the system?
        Only if one runs Rprinter on a workstation. More sensibly,
put printers on the server where things are stable <sic>. Think
about printing habits and allocate local and networked printers
accordingly.

>3> Where do you put the modem? On the file server, any terminal, or
>a specific dedicated terminal for the modem only?
        On a PC. The server does not do PC-Anywhere or dial in access.

>4> The biggie: The least expensive PC's I can find to use as terminals
>are 286's with 40M hard drives for about $600. Is there a cheaper way
>to do the terminals while still using PC's? If not, if I write something
>for use under DOS that has a real nice screen interface, will it run on
>something like a Wyse terminal?
        Forget the 286's, please forget real terminals (won't run NetWare
anyway). Remove the 486-50 as vast overkill, put the saved money in 386's
even if 386/SX machines and put a 386-33 in the  server (it will run
pretty cold to the touch with only 10 clients).

>Please e-mail any suggestions, comments, etc. One acceptable suggestion
>would be the title of a book that help me do this. I can't find a good one.
        Ain't none that do this job, that's why they <under>pay you. Situations
are too different to give meaningful advice in most cases. However, check your
local bookstore for the $40 ripoff items; something might be just what you
need.
        Joe D.

>BMc
From: srinivas@KAILASH.ERNET.IN
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: Like to subscribe to the NOVELL LAN INTEREST GROUP
Date: 17 Apr 92 00:17:15 GMT
Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU


								15th Apr 92
								Bombay
	To
	  Novell LAN Interest Group


	 From
	      Srinivas v.
	      Project Engineer, Lan Project
	      Department of Computer Science & Engineering
	      Indian Institute of Technology,
	      Powai, Bombay 400 076,
	      INDIA
	      email : srinivas@cse.iitb.ernet.in


	Hi,

		I would like to join the elite group. Please add me
	    to your mailing list.

	    Hoping to hear from you all.

							    with regards
							    srinivas v.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: KPMG Austria
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 19:14:19 MEW
Reply-To:     Bernhard Kraml <bkraml@kpmg.co.at>
From:         Bernhard Kraml <bkraml@KPMG.CO.AT>
Subject:      Re: Windows 3.1, packet drivers and Me

On Tue, 7 Apr 1992 08:38:59 CST, "Thomas D. Gasser" <THOMASG@EPX.HSCS.UMN.EDU>
 wrote:
> Hello all in Windows 3.1 land
>
> I have received my copy of Windows 3.1 :-).  My question has to do with the
> IPX.OBJ that comes with it.
>
> I am running on a Novell Netware 2.2 network using Ethernet cards and version
> of the packet drivers.  Is there a way to make a new packet driver IPX with
> this OBJ or has someone already done this.  I am currently using the PDIPX
> from INTEL.  When I set up Windows it told me that there are compatabilty
> problems with my version of IPX and 3.1.
>
> Thanks alot for your help.
> *********************************************************************
> *  Thomas D. Gasser                                                 *
> *  Department of Neurosurgery                *******     ******     *
> *  University of Minnesota                    ***  *** *** ***      *
> *  (612) 624-4427                             ***   *****  ***      *
> *  E-Mail:  THOMASG@EPX.HSCS.UMN.EDU         *****        *****     *
> *                                                                   *
> *********************************************************************


Hello Thomas,

You can build a new ipx.com with the program wsgen or shgen.
I don't know which one is supplied with NW 2.2.

You need this ipx.obj from your WIN3.1 package and a *.obj for your
Network Interface Card. My *.obj is named sne2000.obj and is used with wsgen.

Look at the red books.

Greetings,
Bernhard


--
Bernhard Kraml        bkraml @ kpmg.co.at         Tel: (++43-222) 313 32-249
KPMG Alpen-Treuhand                    Austria, Kolingasse 19, A-1090 Vienna
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU