HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: REWOICC%ERENJ.BITNET@pucc.Princeton.EDU (woj)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject:      caterwaul
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

richard asked about caterwaul news...unfortunately, i have none. i got
_the nature of things_ cd directly from the band a few months ago and
a short note from betsy martin as well. she didn't have much to say: just
that things were going okay and that she'd send out more news as things
happened. since then though, nothing. maybe i'll write her a quick letter
(like i have time).

incidentially, i rather liked _the nature of things_. granted, it does
not have the same audial (that should be a word if it already isn't) im-
pact as _pin and web_, but it still packs a wallop.

woj
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Tue, 6 Oct 1992 11:32:20 EDT
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 11:29:26 -0400
From: j-dunphy@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Insolvent One)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: "Another Day"
Message-ID: <BvpHoL.BxA@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

Just a few questions regarding "Another Day":

Who wrote it?
When and where was it performed?

Thanks!

--
Julianne Dunphy
j-dunphy@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu

-- 



-------------------------
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Sat, 26 Sep 1992 15:03:10 EDT
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 15:01:25 -0400
Subject: **** Monthly FAQ for totally ignorant Kate beginners PART III ******
From: rhill@netrun.cts.com (ronald hill)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Comments: Cloudbuster
Message-ID: <J01PRB3w165w@netrun.cts.com>
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

pols051@cantva.canterbury.ac.nz writes:

> A month or so ago I read a claim in a student newspaper here in New Zealand
> that CD's may begin to degrade after perhaps 7-8 years.   Is there any
> foundation to this, or is it just a baseless rumour?   At this point I am jus
> starting to convert my record and tape collection to CD, so this is of some
> importance to me.
> 
> On the other hand, would I be better just to wait until the new digital compa
> cassette machines become available?  That way I could still keep many of the 
> cassettes I still have (assuming that these new machines play them, which I'm
> told they do).   Does anyone know when these new machines will hit New Zealan
> and at what price (please specify $NZ or $US dollars).
> 
> E-mail me directly if you don't wish to take up space on this newsgroup.
> 
> Thanks to anyone who can help with these.
> 
> Andrew Hoy
> Political Science Department
> University of Canterbury, New Zealand.

Cd's do deteriorate over time. I have heard different time spans though, 
some being up to ten years and others being refered to in terms of 
playings, such as several thousands of playings. One thing is for sure, 
cd's DO LAST LONGER than either vinyl or current audio tapes. It won't 
hurt to switch everything over to cd (except maybe yor wallet). As for 
the "new fangled" tape players I don't know what the price will be or 
when it's available but I don't think they will have the ease of 
playability as cd's. CD's being operated by lasers are great for scanning 
through a song, rewinding to hear your fave snippet or quickly skipping a 
track you don't like.
my 2 cents
                          Lionheart

--                    
INTERNET:  lionhart@netlink.cts.com (Jackie Zucconi)
UUCP:   ...!ryptyde!netlink!lionhart
NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Sat, 26 Sep 1992 15:01:53 EDT
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 15:01:20 -0400
Subject: *** Monthly FAQ for totally ignorant Kate beginners PART I ******
From: rhill@netrun.cts.com (ronald hill)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Comments: Cloudbuster
Message-ID: <w41PRB1w165w@netrun.cts.com>
From: s.telford@ed.ac.uk (Scott Telford)
Subject: Never Forever boxset
Organization: Edinburgh University Home for Deranged Kate Bush Fans.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 15:31:57 GMT

The latest issue of Record Collector has about four ads for this
(including one with a picture). The consensus seems to be:

- Book, 48/49 pp, "many unpublished photos"
- Poster
- Postcard
- T-shirt
- Certificate
- CD (optional)
- 1000 or 1500 copies ltd. edition

The cover appears to have what looks like an old EMI photo of KaTe
sitting on the floor wearing a short gown and tights.

UK prices are L25 w/o CD, or L30-L38 with CD.

--
Scott Telford, Dept of Computer Science,      electric mail: s.telford@ed.ac.uk
University of Edinburgh, Mayfield Rd, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK.
------- Rollin' over like a big, big cloud/Walkin' out in the Big Sky! --------
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Tue, 6 Oct 1992 05:42:19 EDT
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 05:41:52 -0400
From: a70901@uwasa.fi (Mikko Suhonen)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <9210060941.AA05328@uwasa.fi>
From: a70901@uwasa.fi (Mikko Suhonen)
Subject: This Woman's Work
Organization: University of Vaasa, Finland
Distribution: eunet
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 09:41:14 GMT

I would like to know about the bonus-recordings that appear on the CD-box
This Woman's Work. In the box, I've heard, there is two CD:s including
unreleased material by Kate. What songs appear on these bonus discs?

I couldn't think of buying the box, because I have all the CD:s already 
and I don't want to buy second copy of all these albums.
Is it possible to get these additional discs separately? 
Are they worth buying?
 


-- 
Mikko Suhonen
Vaasa, Finland
(a70901@uwasa.fi)

x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Tue, 29 Sep 1992 08:47:12 EDT
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 08:46:27 -0400
From: uli@intellektik.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Ulrich Grepel)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <9209291245.AA02826@kino.intellektik.informatik.th-darmstadt.de>
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa


In article <1992Sep26.174914.4732@solace.hsh.se> wilt@solace.hsh.se 
(Gustav Holmberg) writes:

>She's overrated, she's beginning to look like Joan Collins,
>her songs have nothing to do with her life at all but are there
>just to make her fans to think that they know her, she releases records
>twice a century and she sings like a pig just about to be castrated.

Perhaps Gustav left his terminal unattended?

-  David
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Sat, 26 Sep 1992 13:27:40 EDT
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 13:27:03 -0400
From: jessica@maurolycus.rutgers.edu (jessica)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Jig of Life poem
Message-ID: <Sep.26.13.26.55.1992.7882@maurolycus.rutgers.edu>
Organization: Rutgers University Computing Services
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa


blondie@netcom.com (jill) writes:

>	I've currently got my CD player on repeat 1 for Jig of Life.
>Does anyone have the words to the poem on line?  Could you please mail
>them to me?	

>	jill (blondie@netcom.com)

finger me (jessica@hardees.rutgers.edu). :)

			     jessica

-- 
|| jessica  || It is this that || Don't try to tell me there's no reason for ||
|| lawrence ||    brings us    || any moment in time, every memory of mine.  ||
|| koeppel  ||    together.    || Those years are lines of color on my face, ||
|| dembski  ||        --Kate   || the past is warpaint.     --Happy Rhodes   ||
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Mon, 28 Sep 1992 15:57:08 EDT
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 15:55:50 -0400
From: stev0@sti.com (Steve Berlin)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: These boots were made for walking
Message-ID: <Bv94or.FHE@sti.com>
Organization: Software Transformation, Inc.
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

Well, I just got my mailing from Intergalactic Garage.  Here's what I'm
ordering from them:  Nothing.

Not because of any politics, attitude, or any other excuse like that.  It's
just that they don't have anything I want (at the moment).  If I were just
starting out my music collection, it would be a Goldmine (put your own joke
here), but they didn't have the one thing that interests me at the moment:
the Never Forever Boxed Set (rumor has it that it includes a life-size blowup
doll of Kate).  I want to keep getting mail from them - they have potential,
but they swung & missed this time 'round.

Still no word from C-Side.

Also, this debate about boots:

I don't dislike bootlegs not for any moral reason (I try to avoid having
morals unless I can make money from them), but because 80% of the boots out
there (not just Kate, but other artists, both ones I like & the Grateful
Dead) are Live in Concert bootlegs, and I don't even like most "Studio"
live albums, never mind ones that sound like they were recorded off of a
"My first Sony".  As for bootlegs of "Rare Sessions" (such as the 8,000+
Beatles Abbey Road sessions), do I REALLY care if they have a version of
"Here Comes the Sun" with an extra two notes at the end? (Or, to put it
in Katian Terms, a version of "Experiment IV" with a so-overused-it-could-
be-a-Saturday-Night-Live-skit-voice-over?  I think not.

Bootlegs I approve of:  Ones of songs you can't get anywhere else, or at least
for a reasonable price (such as, say, they Cathy Demos).  If I could buy an
official everyone-gets-the-royalties-they-deserve of Kate's B-Sides, I would
in a minute.  But I can't, so recorded it from a friend who spent gobs of
cash on TWW boxed set.  Hey, XTC has a couple of rarities & B's albums,
why can't Kate? (Outside the boxed set, I mean).

- Stev0 the frugal

________________________________________ ___I_`.*.'_B_ __________"I just know 
       Steve Berlin               .   K +  * .o   o.* `.`O +.   |that some-
       stev0@sti.com             '   *  . ' ' |\^/|  `. * .  *  |thing good 
[Rush quote removed from      (: May All Your  \V/  Good Dreams |is gonna 
 here. I have SOME taste.]    and Fine Wishes  /_\  Come True:) |happen!" -
============================================= _/ \_ ===========  Utah Saints
.sig (c) 1992 by Mike Jittlov [for all the protection that affords] 
.sig re-mixed by Stev0 (c) 1992 - extended warlord bait remix.
-- 
Stev0@sti.com
This is a kibo .signature virus.  Kibo's .sig file has now
been appended to yours.

x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Mon, 28 Sep 1992 01:56:04 EDT
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 01:52:32 -0400
From: neilg@sfu.ca (Neil K. Guy)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Do CD's Degrade?, and DCC Question
Message-ID: <neilg.717356145@sfu.ca>
Subject: Re: Over the Rhine
Reply-To: andrew_abernathy%wire.UUCP@mathcs.emory.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa


In article <01GPJ9Q4VRUO8Y5185@MPS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>  
TREADWAY@MPS.OHIO-STATE.EDU (JOEL TREADWAY) writes:
> 

> You may want to check out the Cincinnati band OVER THE RHINE - 

> especially Innocence Mission fans.  I believe they have one minor
> label release and a recent "major" label release.  


	I saw this group in Atlanta several months back when they
opened up for Adrian Belew.  Great shows from both!!  I
bought the CD at the concert: "'Til We Have Faces."  (1991,
Scampering Songs.)  It's very good.  Parts of the album
could perhaps be a bit more "stable," but overall it was an
excellent purchase!!  (Specially good tracks:  "If I'm
Drowning" and "Ubiquitous Hands.")  I wrote them asking
to be updated if they came out with any other albums; they
sent back info on their new album, "Patience," which I
also purchased.  (1992, Scampering Songs Publishing and
GMMI Music.)  I thought the first album was better, but I
must admit to having only listened to it once or twice so
far... I was on a kick with some other group when I got the
album, listened to it once, and haven't gotten back to it
yet.

	If I'm deluged with requests for more impressions of
"Patience," I'll make sure to listen to it more closely
and post a few comments on it. 


--
andrew_abernathy@wire.gwinnett.com (NeXTmail gleefully accepted)
I'll deny I ever said it
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Mon, 28 Sep 1992 22:43:38 EDT
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 22:42:22 -0400
Message-ID: <m0mZUzo-0006yPC@chinet.chi.il.us>
Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa



fmcquarr@sfu.ca writes:
>has the cover picture of Ms. Bush in jeans, plaid shirt, and woolly
>red socks, (I presume this is the "box" picture, but it has been cropped
>so that the box is not visible). This is also the picture that is used
>in the CD in the This Woman's Work box set.

Not my TWW box.  I've got the regular Kite pic.  This set is a UK edition
purchased in Canada.

>heard "The Dreaming". Has Ms. Bush ever said what the muttering at
>the very end of the track is or what it means? I assume it is some
>aboriginal language, or perhaps some backward masking?

Something about airplanes.  Geez, I used to know all this stuff, honest...
-- 
Jon Drukman (God's personal DJ)                 uunet!sco!jondr   jondr@sco.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always note the sequencer - this will never let us down.
From: boek@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (Christopher Boek)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: The Innocence Mission?
Date: 24 Sep 92 02:34:21 GMT
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Wed, 23 Sep 1992 22:48:55 EDT
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net

stevev@greylady.uoregon.edu (Steve VanDevender) writes:

>Cheryl Rohrer rather badly misinterprets:

>>>In article <0096104B.B3AC3F00.11567@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz>,
>>>hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz writes...
>>>A friend lent me a tape copy of their eponymous album. It's
>>>bloody excellent.  Someone tell me all about them, *please*

>>I believe that eponymous was an early 'greastest hits' for R.E.M., but i may
>>be mistaken.
>>cheryl

>"Eponymous" also means "giving one's name to a nation, tribe, or
>place".  In Hobbs's usage it means that The Innocence Mission's
>first album is named _The Innocence Mission_ after the name of
>the group.  R.E.M., however, also has an album named _Eponymous_.

Presumably, REM did it as a joke.

Chris.

--
|Christopher Boek                               boek@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU|
|  Dept ElecEng, University of Melbourne,  Parkville Vic 3052 Australia |
|_____"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way or another"______|
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Tue, 29 Sep 1992 13:58:02 EDT
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 11:21:33 -0400
From: v129j6ed@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (This is F.U.N.)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Post Results from the All-Out Kate Bush Poll
Message-ID: <BvCInG.7Bp@acsu.buffalo.edu>
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University at Buffalo
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@cis.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

In article <9209251223.AA05602@relay1.UU.NET>, DKASTENS@dosuni1.rz.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (Dirk Kastens) writes...
>Greetings,
>Thanks very much for the poll.
>But I think, the result needs some interpretation.
>A great problem in statistical analysis are the missing values. If you
>make an interview and some people don't respond to a question, how can
>you rate the result?
>In the Kate poll you didn't care about the missing values, you just
>calculated the mean (sum of points / number of values). Is this
>correct?
>Let's examine one extreme case:
>song A = 1 x 10 points, 35 x missing value  -> mean: 10/1   = 10
>song B = 35 x 10 points, 1 x 9 points       -> mean: 359/36 = 9.9722
>Which one is better?
>Regarding the albums we find Vol.1 before TSW. But only half of the
>voters gave out points for Vol.1, whereas all of them valued TSW. The same
>with the new number one song Under the Ivy.
>I think that it's more fair to order the songs by the sum of points.
>What do you think?

I always found that knowledge is power.  The fact is that if someone does
not know a song, why should that harm it's average.  The truth is we don't
know how someone will vote for it.  The assumption I went under was that
total points mean nothing.

Let's use another extreme example:
song A = 300 points, 60 votes
song B = 298 points  30 votes

This could be disadvantageous to a song voted 1 more time than another.
"Suspended in Gaffa" and the "Jig of Life" would have tied for the top.

The whole poll, from my point of view, was what people thought about each song.
That came out pretty well since all the songs were voted for over 60% of the
time.  

Using statistical method would have been better, but since I am a History
major, I am not sure how to set this up.


*******************************************************************************
"As your Mr.Spock said, The needs of the many outweighed the needs of the few."
"A truism, like most of Spock's Epigrams. But on occasion, I'm afraid, cold
comfort." Jillian and James T. Kirk - "Star Trek - Debt of Honour"
*******************************************************************************
Jef Kolodziej                                                   The KaTeFan(tm)
v129j6ed@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu           State University of New York at Buffalo
History Major                                                  51 East NorthRup
(716) 837-9610                                                Buffalo, NY 14214
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Mon, 28 Sep 1992 18:08:17 EDT
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 18:06:05 -0400
From: larry@cs.com (Larry Spence)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Do CD's Degrade?, and DCC Question
Message-ID: <1992Sep28.204844.11552@cs.com>
From: drk@leland.Stanford.EDU (David Koehler)
Subject: Re: Why Kate Bush is such a bitch.
Keywords: Kate Bush, bitch, not even worth fucking.
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 21:10:21 GMT

In article <1992Sep26.174914.4732@solace.hsh.se> wilt@solace.hsh.se 
(Gustav Holmberg) writes:

>She's overrated, she's beginning to look like Joan Collins,
>her songs have nothing to do with her life at all but are there
>just to make her fans to think that they know her, she releases records
>twice a century and she sings like a pig just about to be castrated.

Perhaps Gustav left his terminal unattended?

-  David


x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Sat, 26 Sep 1992 02:52:14 EDT
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 02:51:44 -0400
From: mark@netcom.com (Mark Jeghers)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Wanted: your analysis of 'The Ninth Wave'
Message-ID: <-=!p#bj.mark@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)
Apparently-To: <rec-music-gaffa@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

I've been given a cursory explanation by one person of the meaning of
the set of songs in 'The Ninth Wave', namely that it is an account of
a person lost at sea, trying to stay awake, etc.

Since I am getting aquainted with the Hounds of Love album for the
first time, this interpretation sounds plausible.  However, I'd be interested
in other peoples ideas as well - and pointers to any FAQ articles or
the like which might be in existance, also lyrics for all the songs.

Some points of this interpretation are not clear to me; for example, 
what's going on exactly in Waking the Witch, is the helicopter at the
end to mean she's rescued, is she dead in later passages like 'Watching
You Without Me' and Hello Earth' or just unconcious.

In addition, I'd be interested if anyone thinks this interpretation is
completely erroneous - assuming you can offer a better one :-)

Thanks

Mark Jeghers

x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Mon, 28 Sep 1992 01:47:18 EDT
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 01:43:56 -0400
Subject: (no subject given!)
From: lionhart@netlink.cts.COM (Jackie Zucconi)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <ZsqsRB7w165w@netlink.cts.com>
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

news@leland.stanford.edu (Mr News) writes:

> Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
> Path: inchanak
> From: inchanak@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Smith)
> Subject: Cathy demos
> Message-ID: <1992Sep24.073725.15551@leland.Stanford.EDU>
> Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
> Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 92 07:37:25 GMT
> Lines: 11
> 
> I saw a Kate Bush 7" in the record shop the other day labeled "Cathy Demos",
> and since it looked somewhat uncommon and I'm reasonably fond of Kate Bush,
> I bought it.  However, I'm not very familiar with her discography, and I
> was wondering what exactly this is, since it doesn't appear to be terribly
> official.  Also, it is marked "volume 3", so I was wondering just how many 
> other volumes there are.  I'm rather new to this group, so please excuse if
> these are oft-asked questions.
> 
> Inchan Kwon
> inchanak@leland.stanford.edu
>   

There are four total 7"s of the Cathy Demos (tell me anyone if there are 
more). They consist of songs that Kate did supposedly before recording 
the Kick Inside for EMI. 
                         Lionheart

--                    
INTERNET:  lionhart@netlink.cts.com (Jackie Zucconi)
UUCP:   ...!ryptyde!netlink!lionhart
NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Mon, 5 Oct 1992 20:31:10 EDT
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 20:05:57 -0400
From: scasterg@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stuart M Castergine)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Why Kate Bush is such a bitch.
Message-ID: <1992Oct6.000616.23802@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Keywords: Kate Bush, bitch, not even worth fucking.
Organization: The Ohio State University
	<1992Sep26.211021.10649@leland.Stanford.EDU>
	<1736@lysator.liu.se>
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@cis.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

In article <1736@lysator.liu.se> jan_b@lysator.liu.se (Jan Besehanic) writes:
>drk@leland.stanford.EDU (David Koehler) writes:
>
>
>Probably, although she *IS* beginning to look like Joan Collins... *grin*
>

STOP SAYING THAT!!! ... You're scaring me.



-- 
scasterg@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu -- Stuart M. Castergine
Fiver: "Oh, Hazel, look! The field! It's covered with blood!"
Hazel: "Don't be silly, it's only the light of the sunset." -- Watership Down
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Tue, 29 Sep 1992 15:37:27 EDT
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:34:10 -0400
Message-ID: <9209291834.AA02114@relay1.UU.NET>
From: JONES%RPIECS.BITNET@VM.ITS.RPI.EDU
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: End of "Sat in Your Lap"
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

A brief nit-picky note to Uli:

In a recent posting, you noted "We let the weirdness in" as being
the last line in "Sat in Your Lap."  Actually, if my memory serves,
these are in fact the last words spoken at the very end of "Leave
It Open."  The last words of SiYL are "...across the water," as
the last in the series of something like "across the desert, across
the elements, across the water..."

Like I said, nit-picky.  But hope this helps both you and the person
you were posting to. :)

All the best,
Deb Wentorf

P.S. to Gustav Holberg:  Apology accepted re: that vicious and
inexcusable posting that idiot sent to Love Hounds.  It hardly
seemed likely that anyone who knows what's good for them would
have sent such a posting to Love Hounds in the first place; I
hope they nail the person responsible. :)
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Mon, 5 Oct 1992 20:41:31 EDT
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 20:40:43 -0400
From: nrc@bsbbs.columbus.oh.us (N. Richard Caldwell)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Homeground Looking at the Big Sky
Message-ID: <L9q7RB2w165w@bsbbs.columbus.oh.us>