HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jagreath@eos.ncsu.edu (JOSEPH ALAN GREATHOUSE)
Subject: Wolfpack vs. Wahoos summary (Short)
Originator: jagreath@c00053-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: jagreath@eos.ncsu.edu (JOSEPH ALAN GREATHOUSE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 20:45:23 GMT



Just a quick summary of the NC State - Virginia game:

The 'Pack looked pretty good.  The team got scoring from all over the place.
One blocked punt returned for a touchdown, two big plays for touchdowns
(59 yard run by Anthony Barbour and a 65 yard pass from Terry Jordan), and
an interception returned for a touchdown along with a field goal by Videtech 
put 31 points on the board for State.

Virginia was able to sustain one drive all day.  They pulled Goodman in the
second half and put in a redshirt freshman (I can't remember the guy's name)
at quarterback who took Virginia's first possession of the second half and
marched the team down the field for a touchdown.  That was it for the Cavaliers.

Some interesting notes:  NC State got the big plays this year, and it showed.
Virginia had success moving the ball until they got down to around the NCSU 30.
They couldn't get much further all day.  NC State will be in a position to 
get a very good bowl bid with victories over Duke next week and Wake the 
following week.  

If anybody has stats on this game, I'd like to see 'em!

Final score:  NC State Wolfpack 31 - Virginia Cavaliers 7

Go State! :)

-- 
******************************************************************************
*  Joseph A. Greathouse     jagreath@eos.ncsu.edu                            *
*  North Carolina State University CSC Department Operator                   *
*  The opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily represent those of *
*  the CSC department, NCSU, or Engineering Computing Operations.            *
******************************************************************************
From: bruce@max.cchem.berkeley.edu (Bruce Spath)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: What happened to OU?
Date: 12 Nov 1992 20:20:32 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: max.cchem.berkeley.edu

>> Scott,
>>   I'm sorry, but, I have to say you are correct. It saddens me when
>> my clueless OU friends don't understand this. These are people that
>> are losers in everyday life and the only thing that is positive is
>> OU Football, and when they aren't winning, they get upset.
>> -- 
>> Mike Minihan      mminihan@arco.com
>
>Mike,
>
>I'm sorry, but, I have to say that you are a complete idiot.  Your accusation
>in reference to Oklahomans is without basis and devoid of any intelligence
>whatsoever.  Clearly, you are a dolt.  Have a nice day.




The football statement is clearly a reference to OU fans, not to Oklahomans.
As such it is definitely applicable as OU has some of the most obnoxious
fans in the country.  Note:  they're so arrogant that they assume that a 
reference to OU applies to all Oklahomans.  Clearly, the responder to Mike is
an OU fan.  Please don't confuse the issue by expanding the population of OU to 
that of the entire state. 


					Bruce Spath
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jeff@photon.cs.tamu.edu (Jeff Goldberg)
Subject: New A&M QB (was Lee Corso's prediction)
Followup-To: Jeff@cs.tamu.edu
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Texas A&M University
	<1992Nov6.193940.9016@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 22:04:00 GMT

>For those of you who missed it, Lee Corso last night predicted that 
>Louisville will beat Texas A&M on Saturday.

What Lee didn't know about was Corey Pullig, A&M's new starting
quarterback.  Had A&M continued to play Granger (who started the
previous 8 games), and primarily run against an 8 man front, he likely
could have been right.  However, now with Pullig at QB, A&M immediately
has a very capable passing attack to go along with two super backs, Greg
Hill and Rodney Thomas.  Although Louisville did start on defense with
an 8 man front, they were forced to quickly drop back off the line; both
the the passing and running game benefited from the defensive
adjustment.

Did anyone watching the game notice the confidence that Slocum and Co.
showed in Pullig's ability to complete his passes?  For example, A&M
threw on 3rd and short several times, something that would have never
been called with Granger starting.  It's going to be much more difficult
for anyone to beat A&M with this change in their offense.
--
           Jeff Goldberg                        
           College Station, Texas       
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: chyang@anaphora.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang)
Subject: Re: Alabama's Newest Problems: NCAA and Gene Jelks
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 17:05:23 EST
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Originator: chyang@anaphora.engin.umich.edu


In article <6969@news.duke.edu>, daniel@acpub.duke.edu (Daniel Crawford) writes:
> 
> I don't know if this information has already been posted to the net or
> not.  Either way, here it is:
> 
> Excerpt from a story in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution,
> Thursday, Nov.12, 1992.
> 
> "ALABAMA'S JELKS FOLLOWS PATH OF AUBURN'S RAMSEY"
> 
> "A year after Eric Ramsey stunned the Auburn football program with
> secretly recorded tapes and allegations of illegal cash payments, former
> Alabama captain Gene Jelks has produced tapes of his own alleging NCAA
> violations by the Crimson Tide."
> 
> These tapes were provided directly to the Constitution and contain
> conversations with former Asst. coach Jerry Pullen among others.
> 
> There is another interesting angle on the story:  Jelks' allegations
> include his own mother, who he said "conspired" with Pullen to get him
> to sign with Alabama.
> 
> Another story in the Constitution described the families fear for
> themselves now that their son has gone public.  They fear that harm
> might come to them.
> 
> I'm sure the story will be in _many_ other papers tomorrow.  We'll have
> to see what comes of it.
> 
> Final quote from Jelks: "I want kids to know that Tide Pride is not all
> what they think it is.  They buy and sell it.  And when they're through
> with you, they kick you to the curb."
> 
> 
> T. Daniel Crawford
> Center for Computational Quantum Chemsitry

	Why is it that when a team is doing well something like that happens
and screw up a team for the rest of the season.  

	First it was BJ Hobert of Washington. Now this guy from Alabama, when
does it end???

	I hope nothing like what happend to Washington last week happens to
Alabama.  It is such a shame to have a good season tarnish because of things
like that.

- Chung Yang.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer)
Subject: Cougars: Half a team
Originator: jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu
Organization: Washington State University!
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 92 05:29:49 GMT


WANTED: one college FB coach with play-calling ability
        one steady (not spectacular) college QB 

Well, today was another classic game in Cougarville, as WSU squeaked
past ASU 20-18 in Pullman.  As has been the case for a month now,
with the possible exception of the USC game, the Cougar defense was
*spectacular*, and the offense, nowhere to be found.

Not only was the offense inept, but their net contribution to the 
victory was probably negative, as they set up 10 of ASU's 18 points
by turning the ball over and leaving the defense in horrible field
position.  Their opening possesion ended in an interception putting
ASU inside the WSU 10 yard line, leading to a TD about a minute into
the game.  Later, the defense allowed ASU only a field goal after 
being put in terrible field position again.  Two of the remaining
eight ASU points came on a blocked punt for a safety.  The defense was
only really responsible for 6 of ASU's points, and many times bailed
out the offense, once stopping ASU on fourth and inches deep in Cougar
territory. 

Despite great field position provided by the defense many times, the 
offense was only able to produce two TDs, and had only one really
sustained drive.  On back-to-back possessions in the third quarter, the
defense caused turnovers that set up the Cougar offense deep in ASU
territory... where they were unable to muster even a single first down
(except one caused by a penalty) and both times had to settle for FGs.

Let's just say that fans here are frustrated... both with Drew Bledsoe,
who is the most overrated QB in the nation by *far*, and with Mike Price,
who until today, has refused to open up the offense (and even today there
were many stretches where the play-calling was predictable).  Thank goodness
it is the defense that is young.

At 7-2, we're still hoping we can get a bowl game out of this season, but
with games at Stanford and home against UW coming up, we could very easily
be looking at 7-4 and on the bubble.

Jim
Go Cougars, Vikings, Northstars!
From: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: NEBRASKA
Date: 8 Nov 92 17:15:22 GMT
Article-I.D.: nntpd2.1992Nov8.173043.20357
Distribution: usa
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


In article <1992Nov8.060408.28087@engr.latech.edu>, plaul@engr.latech.edu (Pummy Laul) writes...
> 
>Way to go Cornhuskers.  I did think KU had a chance but the big red machine
>just rolled on.    
> 
>Good Luck to Nebraska in the Orange Bowl.  And here's hoping they walk all over Miami.      
> 
>Go KU  beat Colorado next week.
> 
> 
>Pummy Laul
>Jayhawk in Exile 
> 

Now this is sooooo refreshing. Are you reading this CU fans? This guy has the
class to just admit that his team got beat, does not whine about it, and then
focuses in on the next game. He is a good looser and I bet he will be a good
winner if KU beats CU next week. Bravo !!!  KU has the NU fans respect. CU
does not.

Folks! This Nebraska team is not the same team that played at Washington
earlier this year. This is a team that has matured and is confident. At this
point I don't care who we get in the Orange Bowl.

I think the main factor is "Smokin" Tommy Frazier. Hey, this kid can run the
option and this kid can pass. Did you see the performance in the 1st half vs
KU? He can zip that ball. 140 or so yards passing and 3 TD passes. Brown had
108 yards on the ground in the 1st quarter and they had not even turned Jones
loose yet. (I could have sworn Jones was a Soph from Omaha. Is it Soph or Jr?)

The defense is hot. Of course the home crowd does help them a lot. The NU fans
are sensing something BIG here. I have NEVER heard them so vocal. The thing
that impressed me was the Husker secondary. They were all over their
assignments.

Now we must keep this in perspective. This is happening at home vs good teams
but not great teams. I still sense that NU is/has returned to the power it once
was and possibly even better. Time will tell.

KU has nothing to hang their heads about. The Jayhawks are on working on a very
good season and can do themselves proud with a win next week. Go Kansas -
destroy CU. Perhaps if you conference with coach Osborne this week he can give
you some pointers on how to blow out CU.    ;^)


Husker Henderson
From: tomd@solbourne.com (Tom Diessner)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Nebraska beats Colorado
Date: 9 Nov 1992 11:36:00 -0700
Organization: Solbourne Computer, Inc., Longmont, CO
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: durango.solbourne.com

In article <1992Nov3.174533.24107@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com> m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson) writes:

>I was not going to say anything untill you folks had the balls to talk trash
>EVEN NOW!!! Grow up. Notice that this post is Tuesday. Monday I said nothing
>to stir up the storm. I'm only laying it on today since I'm reading this krap
>flowing out of Boulder.
>Husker Henderson
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> M_Henderson               | "Could you please continue the petty bickering?
> Marty Henderson           |  I find it most intriguing."   ---    Data, 
> Woodland Park, Colorado   |  Star Trek, The Next Generation, "Haven"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other mindless dribble deleted

How old are you Marty? This has got to be the most immature ranting I have
ever read on this network. The game is over, thank goodness, and Nebraska
whipped Colorado. Life goes on. Please put a cork in it!!!!!





-- 

Thomas Diessner | tomd@solbourne.COM | Solbourne Computer Inc. | Longmont, CO
				"GO BUFFS"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: alan@tsd.arlut.utexas.edu (Alan Martin)
Subject: Re: Glen Mason to Ohio State?
Organization: Applied Research Labs, University of Texas at Austin
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 16:48:04 GMT

scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn) writes:

>  Scott Davis writes:

>>First, Alan already mentioned about Mason being gone.  If the OhioSt
>>coaching position opens up, then I would think Mason would probably
>>take it.  Rumor has it, that he has this clause in his contract.

>     I'm not so sure about that. Rumors I've heard in Columbus say two other
>things:

>     (1) That Mason might be put off by the intense scrutiny and criticism that
>Buckeye coaches are subjected to. Even Woody Hayes got booed frequently. By all
>accounts I've heard, Jayhawk fans love Mason. Unless he believes that KU has
>peaked this year, he may decide to stay.

Coaches don't seem to think this way, and I've always wondered why.  Mason can
win 6 or 7 games a year and be put on a pedestal at Kansas.  Or, he could
win 9 games a year and be flogged at Ohio State.  I guess if you're ambitious,
you always think *you're* going to be the guy that will put Ohio State back
in the 10 to 11 win category every year.  Not to mention that Ohio State
*must* pay more than Kansas.




						Al
						alan@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: The REAL top five
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 07:56:41 GMT

In article <tTB=Zb@engin.umich.edu> hpang@engin.umich.edu (Ho Sun Pang) writes:
>In article <ASH.92Nov9083043@ulysses.mr.ams.com> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:
>>
>>1. Florida State
>>2. Alabama
>>3. Michigan
>>4. Miami
>>5. Notre Dame
>>
>
>I agree with the top 3, but where is Wahington?  I'll rank it either #3 (ahead
>of Michigan) or #4, with ND #5.

which means that Miami is out of top 5? No wonder they don't let you vote!

>
>- Louis

Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dames@cs.uiuc.edu (Raymond Dames)
Subject: Re: Illinois all the way, Bay-bee!! (was, Bowl Game for MSU?) 
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:47:23 GMT

kevins@netcom.com (Kevin Schraith) writes:

>paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger) writes:

>>   My guess is that Ohio State and Michigan are the only sure-fire Bowl
>>   candidates. MSU might be about 50/50, while Iowa, Indiana and UW would
>>   be longshots.

>how come people always overlook Illinois?  Sure, they may have lost to some
>perennial powerhouses like Northwestern, Minnesota, and Houston, but c'mon,
>Minnesota and Houston were road losses.  At 5-4, 3-3 in the BIG 10, they are
>ready to hop into the driver's seat for 2nd place, a very prestigious spot in
>this year's BIG 10.  

yeah but third place gets a better bowl game. 

>I mean, all it would take is a _minor_ upset this Saturday over Michigan and
>they're sitting pretty.  They've beaten Ohio State soundly (on the road, no
>less), and Ohio State will surely lose to Michigan the next weekend, leaving
>them at 5-3 in the Big Ten.  The next week, Illinois plays a surprisingly
>challenging Michigan State AT HOME.  Even if MSU squeaks one by Purdue, they
>will fall to Illinois, leaving them at 5-3 at best.  Indiana and Iowa are
>tied with Illinois at 3-3, so they will both have to lose.  Ohio State should
>have no problem with Indiana.  And Iowa will surely drop one of their last
>two games - against Northwestern and Minnesota, two teams which Illinois has
>shown are good enough to beat high-calibre teams.

i don't think the illini are going to pull it out against michigan, and msu's
running game looks great (although it did in '90, too, when we pulled out a
last second victory at memorial stadium).  one thing that i'd put money on,
though, is that michigan will NOT cover the (now) 28 pt spread.  illinois has
a tendency to play up or (as is usually the case) down to the level of the
opposing team...that's why we pull out victories against eventual MNC's
(Colorado '90) yet lose to northwestern two years in a row and hand teams
like minnesota their only victory of the year.  my call: MICHIGAN 34 ILLINI 14.

>And there you have it ... Illinois goes to the Citrus Bowl again.  And they
>will certainly deserve it.  Remember, 5-3 is impressive for a 2nd-place team
>in the big 10!

although the second place team in the big 10 goes to the holiday bowl.  hell,
at least we'd have a shot at winning that one.

>(sorry about this posting, folks.  I'm a displaced alum and feeling lonely
>for the sight of my beloved Illini in an article which isn't just moaning
>about how they lost to Northwestern at home or how they didn't deserve to win
>the Ohio State game.  I needed to get this out of my system.  Besides, I
>sense that the woof gods are currently in a pro-woof phase)

seeya at the msu game, kev.

>Hail to the Orange!  Hail to the Blue!

>Kevin Schraith
>kevins@netcom.com
>Illinois, Class of '92
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: galuska@oz.asel.udel.edu (Scott Galuska)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: OSU-Indiana- where on satellite?
Date: 9 Nov 92 14:21:09 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AI duPont Institute


Can someone out there tell me what satellite channel I can find the 
OSU-Indiana game on this week?  Out here in the east, the local affiliate
will probably pick up the BC-Syracuse game, and I'd like to gather the 
Buckeye faithful at a local resaurant with a satellite to watch the game.

(OBTW- my cable company isn't involved in ABC's PPV scheme...)

If you don't know which channel it's on, perhaps if you can send me the
satellite and channel of any midwestern ABC affiliate...

Thanx!

-Scott
-- 
Scott Galuska
Dept. of Computer & Info. Science        "There's no crying in baseball!"
Univ of Delaware
galuska@asel.udel.edu
From: fierro@uts.amdahl.com (Doug Fierro)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Am I alone here or what?
Date: 10 Nov 92 08:09:44 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1992Nov7.225317.16107@netcom.com> mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:
>In article <1dhaaiINN5d9@uwm.edu> paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger) writes:
>
>>Are there any other Wisconsin (or other schools) fans who just wants to puke
>>because of the offensive play-calling? UW can run the ball on Mich State, but
>>they just refuse to pass. No first down passes on about a 50-yard drive to
>>open the game which resulted in a field goal. Then on 3rd-and-10, Alvarez
>>calls a draw. AAAAUUUUGGGGHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>Pass the fucking ball on first down sometimes!!!!!!!
>>
>>p.s. Do any of you fans of Pac 10 teams have this problem?  
>
>Oh, yeah -- Cal's Bruce Gilbertson is oh-so-predictable.  I still hold
>him largely responsible for the loss to U$C, as by the fourth quarter,
>the Trojans had him totally sniffed out.


  It still beats the play-calling of Joe Kapp :-)


 Don't sweat it too much; the Badgers seem like an up-an-coming team.  
Everyone has to pay their dues.  I would have never thought the Bears
would finish in the top-10 of any poll a few years ago.  Now it's no
big deal when we beat UCLA :-)  I still want to get to the Rose Bowl
sometime during my lifetime.  Who knows- a Cal-Wisconsin matchup!
Maybe the next century...


  Doug
-- 
                                                     Doug Fierro
                                      |\             UTS System Software
  O                         __________|_\______      CASE tools development
  \_.______________________| * * * * * * * * */      fierro@uts.amdahl.com
 __\____                   |=================/       (408)746-7102
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon,  2 Nov 92 16:54:07 MST
From: zimms@gecko.ee.byu.edu (Stephen H. Zimmerman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Distribution: world
Organization: Brigham Young University, Provo UT USA
Subject: Re: BYU Report: BYU beats Penn State
Keywords: BYU football


In article <=_#@byu.edu>, rosej@utah.et.byu.edu (James Rose) writes:
>
> ttsai@crhc.uiuc.edu (Timothy Tsai) writes
>
>>How many years of eligibility does Walsh have left?  And is there any chance
>>that he would replace Hancock as the starting QB next year, barring injury?
>
>Hancock and Walsh are now sophomores.
>  (extra text deleted...)

I heard that Ryan Hancock will be playing baseball next year and would most
likely concentrate on baseball only.  He's considered by many to be better at
baseball than football (the California Angels have already offered him $100K
to sign with a farm club--or something like that).  But considering how well he's
done this year, who knows?

>
>>We're saying good things about the pass defense of a Mitchell.  This sure has
>>been a weird season.  :^)
>
>I think that Patrick Mitchell is doing a great job for a sophomore.  He really does have decent speed (WAC 110M high hurdle champion) and is getting better all of the time.  He still allows himself to get beat but he seems to recover well if the ball is a>t all underthrown.  I think he will only get better.  I like him a lot more than Vic Tarleton who hasn't impressed me with either speed or a good feel for the ball.
>
>					James

Yep, I agree.  I predict that Hassan McCullough (check my spelling, but I LOVE
the name) will be starting next year w/ Mitchell.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn)
Subject: The mood in Bricker Hall about Mason
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 15:33:20 GMT

  Mike Doel writes:

>[...]  However, as long as we beat
>the Hoosiers and finish 9-3, I still say Cooper's back.  I bet the OSU
>administration is still feeling snakebit from the Earle Bruce fiasco &
>firing a coach after his best season (and a likely top 20 finish) just
>wouldn't go over real well in the national media (nor should it).

     You might be right, Mike. A Columbus Disgrace columnist wrote yesterday
that OSU President Gordon Gee was asked about Glen Mason. Gee responded that he
had no idea who Glen Mason was. Now, if you consider how hot the coaching issue
is in Columbus, and you consider that Gee was the president of the U. of
Colorado (Kansas' fellow B8 school) before he came here, you have to assume
that Gee is either completely ignorant, or he's lying to make a point. I choose
the latter (Gee has about the same reputation around here for veracity that
Bill Clinton does). Gee took an incredible amount of heat for re-signing Cooper
last year, and he may have decided to stick with him come hell or high water in
the hopes that his judgment will eventually be vindicated. Or it could mean
that the administration has already picked BG coach Gary Blackney to replace
Cooper with. It's all speculation at this point. (That's why it's so much fun!)

                                      Steve

 P.S. For those not fortunate enough to go to Ohio State :-), Bricker Hall is
the administration building here. Trivia, trivia. :-)
///
-- 
    Steve Casburn (scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)
    They gave me differential calculus, and I said "Hit me again"
    So they gave me integral calculus, and I said "Hit me again"
    Now I have vector calculus, and...I'm starting to lose consciousness...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college