HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: josevela@mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx (Jose A. Vela A.)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: AIX 3.2 Gratuitous Incompatibility #1
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:06:18 GMT
Organization: I.T.E.S.M. Campus Monterrey

jw@adasoft.ch (Jamie Watson) writes:

>I find it interesting that this newsgroup is normally flooded with
>postings from people inside IBM telling us how wonderful AIX is;
>but now, with two very serious problems pointed out in AIX 3.2, all
>we get from IBM is resounding silence...

>jw

 Yes !! .....

 Well .. what can we spect ? 

 Do you remember AIX 3.1.* ?? ALLL OF THEM HAVE BUGS !!! ALL !!!

 And when they fixed ONE BUG they make a NEW ONE ...

 Remember 2006 and 2007 ?? je je ....

 We have 'FIXES' and pathches almost for everything !!!

 ( NIS,NFS,yppasswd,passwd,cron,telnetd,rlogin,csh,etc ...)

 This without mention the Assembler 'FIX' ( we haven't yet )
  and a very very 'strange' KERNEL FIX (yes you read it ..
 they send us a NEW /unix !!! because our 530 was
  crashing every 5 minutes or after a few hours, the problem ??? I think that
  IBM are still looking for the solution :-) (I guess they send us a fix that
  says : If CRASH THEN DON'T CRASH :-) )

 To this you have to add that IBM don't have an OFFICIAL FTP host for FIXES
 (like DIGITAL,SUN,HP, and almost any other ... even APPLE !!! and SCO !!!! )
 well there is ONE but there is only ONE FIX ...
  

 When IBM made the announce of AIX 3.2 I said : Oh .. at least a STABLE system
  but after see this kind of problems I dude it ... 
 (do you remember how many time IBM delay the announce ?? I thought they were
  in the process of BETA testers .. but I see that IBM prefer US to do that )

 Come on IBM !!! we need solutions not diplomacy.....

 Well we must wait ....  (as always)

 Now back to your favorite news group and excuse my bad english 

 exit(CRASH_CODE);
 _____________________________________________________________________________
 Jose Angel Vela Avila. 
  Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey
    I.T.E.S.M
  Mexico.
  ___               _    ___  _         __
 (   >             ' )  /    //        /  )  josevela@mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx
  __/________    _  (  / _  // __.    /--/   josevela@tecmtyvm.mty.itesm.mx
 / /  (_)  \_)__</_  \/ </_</_(_/|_  /  ( o  josevela@tecmtyvm.BITNET
<_/
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: karches@utdallas.edu (Tom Karches)
Subject: Re: How to give root privilege to NFS exported file system, HELP!
Organization: Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 17:15:13 GMT

In article <1rk+Y9B@engin.umich.edu> jzeng@norway.biop.umich.edu (Jim Zeng (313)763-5449) writes:
>gla is a PS/2 70 running AIX 1.2.1
>venus is a SPARC II+ running SunOS 4.1.1
>
>On gla, I have /u exported. In order to give venus root privilege on /u,
>I have the following line in /etc/exports
>
>/u	-root=venus
>
>But this doesn't work! What is the right syntax? Thanks.
>
>--Jim

I don't think you can export a filesystem under NFS and give another
machine root privilege. I've been wrong before, though.

Regards,
Tom Karches
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Karches          |"If rap music had been around when I was a kid,
karches@utdallas.edu | I would have become a musician instead of a politician."
---------------------'----------------------------------- Richard Nixon
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: lijewski@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Mike Lijewski)
Subject: Re: Problem building InterViews on AIX 3.2 / IV 2.6 ibm rs6000
Organization: Cornell National Supercomputer Facility
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 14:06:54 GMT

In article <10117@inews.intel.com> tmcconne@sedona.intel.com writes:
>
>In article <1992Mar25.214136.3649@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov>, dealy@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov (Brian Dealy - CSC) writes:
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Has anyone encountered a problem such that the cpp on a machine
>> sees a line like 
>> /**/ # isnt this supposed to be a comment

According to the ANSI C translation phase rules, comments are replaced with
a single space before preprocessing directives are executed.  So the above
line "should" be viewed as a preprocessing directive, at least in ANSI C.

>> and tries to process it anyway.
>> Is there some fix for this (like a flag to set or am I using an
>> obselete cpp technique here or something?) 
>> 
>> Thanks 
>> Brian Dealy
>> dealy@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov
>
>  Yes, I have had that problem. Irritating, isn't it :) The only fix I know of
>is to modify the "/**/". Either remove it, or modify it to "/* */" (I think that
>works). Another "fix" would be to use another cpp, perhaps GNU's?
>
>  My system is: RS/6000 550, AIX 3.1.6. I saw the problem while compiling X11R5.
>Fortunately there was only one instance of "/**/", but that was bad enough.
>
>    Cheers,
>
>    Tom McConnell
>--
> Tom McConnell          |     Internet: tmcconne@sedona.intel.com
> Intel, Corp. C3-21     |     Phone: (602)-554-8229
> 5000 W. Chandler Blvd. | The opinions expressed are my own. No one in 
> Chandler, AZ  85226    | their right mind would claim them.


-- 
Mike Lijewski  (H)607/272-0238 (W)607/254-8686
Cornell National Supercomputer Facility
ARPA: lijewski@theory.tc.cornell.edu  BITNET: mjlx@cornellf.bitnet
SMAIL:  25 Renwick Heights Road, Ithaca, NY  14850
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: madd@world.std.com (jim frost)
Subject: Re: BIND 4.8.3 vs. AIX 3.2
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 18:07:15 GMT

tim@introl.introl.com (Tim Chase) writes:
>Has anybody had problems with their 4.8.3 named dropping core files under
>AIX 3.2?  After installing 3.2, I still ran the same binary of named 4.8.3
>that I've been using fine forever under 3.1.5, but it started core dumping
>about once per day.

I spent the last two weeks tracking down a problem that turned out to
be the 3.2 free() smashing parts of the freed area.  The code had a
loop similar to:

-- cut here --
struct list {
  void *item;
  struct list *prev, *next;
};

void free_list(struct list *l)
{
  while (l) {
    free(l->item);
    free(l);
    l = l->next;
  }
}
-- cut here --

In some instances (but not all) free() would smash some of the data in
'l' (in my case it was at least the 'next' pointer) and shortly
thereafter things were in quite a mess, with data corruption over
widely dispersed areas.

This did not happen under the 3.1 malloc(), nor does it happen under
many other mallocs -- some of which guarantee the contents of freed
areas until at least the next malloc() (I do not recommend making use
of this, but sometimes -- as in the above case -- it's done by
accident).

If you have access to a product which can detect
dereference-after-free (eg CodeCenter) then I suggest you use it --
your problem sounds so close to mine that I'm almost certain it's the
same problem.

>BTW:  I've got a copy running right now using the debugging malloc that
>was recently posted to comp.sources.unix.reviewed.  It's been running for
>about 8 hours so for without a peep.

If the debugging malloc trashes freed areas before returning to the
heap then it would probably find dereferencing through freed areas
quickly.  If not, you might alter its free() implementation to
memset(pointer, 0xff, sizeof_alloc) to speed up your debugging.  If
the debugging malloc does not smash freed areas then a dereferencing
problem would disappear or behave differently under a different malloc
implementation.

jim frost
madd@world.std.com
From: pa@curly.appmag.com (Pierre Asselin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: Trouble with Telebit 3000 (aix 3.1.6)
Keywords: Telebit 3000 V.32 V.22bis Rs232D
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:56:38 GMT
Organization: Applied Magnetics, Goleta, CA

In <1080@curly.appmag.com> pa@curly.appmag.com (Pierre Asselin) writes:

>I'm trying to replace my 2400bps modem by a Telebit 3000 and I'm not
>doing well...

...And part of the problem was the lack of hardware flow control (RTS/
CTS) on my /dev/tty0.  Good thing I vaguely remembered something like
that from comp.unix.aix.  To add flow control,

As root, smit tty, change/show, and insert "clocal," in front of the
stty attributes (both login and run-time for good measure).  This is
necessary for the stty's below to succeed.  Then, still as root,

    # stty get < /dev/tty0
    rs, dtropen, xon, posix		: rts missing !
    # stty add rts < /dev/tty0
    # stty get < /dev/tty0
    rs, dtropen, rts, xon, posix

Then back to smit to remove the "clocal".  It doesn't take effect
immediately, so "stty -clocal < /dev/tty0" from the shell.

Question:
  Will the ODM remove rts from the stack at midnight?
  At the next reboot?

The T3000 dials out just fine with V.32 or V.22bis.  It doesn't
answer V.22bis calls correctly.
-- 

--Pierre Asselin, R&D, Applied Magnetics.
  pa@appmag.com        the usual disclaimers apply.
From: mike@pencom.com (Mike Heath)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: Looking for Mr. System Call...
Date: 16 Apr 92 18:31:42 GMT
Organization: Pencom Software, Austin, TX

In article <1992Apr13.222349.21850@gateway.novell.com> terry@ithaca.npd.Novell.COM (Terry Lambert) writes:
>
>	I still haven't had a response from anyone on how to get loadable system calls
>called from userland.
>
>	1)	I compile the system call
>	2)	I link it with an import of the kernel symbols and and export of my system
>		calls.
>	3)	I load it using sysconfig( SYS_SINGLELOAD...)
>
>	How do I call the blasted thing from userland?

The following file can be used as both an exports file and an imports file:

	#!/unix
	frobnitz	syscall

Replace frobnitz with the name of whatever system call you wish to define.

When you link the system call, use the above as the exports file.
When you link the user program, use it as an imports file.

One of the places this is discussed is in the kmod_load Kernel Service section
of InfoExplorer.

>It doesn't make sense to import
>an export list into a userland library (this would imply that system calls
>are referenced dynamically (by string name?!?) within trap.c), so what gives?

There is no "trap" code.  The "normal" system calls are imported and
exported from /usr/lib/libc.a.  This is why, when statically linking,
you must include the -bI:/lib/syscalls.exp flag to ld.

Symbols imported from /unix are handled specially by the system loader.
They are looked up in the kernel name space (by symbol name).

-- 
Mike Heath		Pencom ...  We're not just headhunters anymore.
Pencom Software		
Austin, TX		
mike@pencom.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: Need help to tar files to tape
From: jhsiung@Sun3.IS (Jack Hsiung)
Date: 16 Apr 92 14:50:39 PDT
Distribution: na
Organization: California Polytechnic University, Pomona
Keywords: tar, tape

In article <1992Apr16.002018.591@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> hubler@galaxy.lerc.nasa.gov (Dale Hubler) writes:
>In article <1992Apr15.102722.1766@nic.csu.net> jhsiung@Sun5.IS (Jack Hsiung) writes:
>>I'm having problems taring files to tape. The machine is RS6000 running
>>AIX 3.1. The tape drive is external IBM 1/4" tape drive. The tape is
>>DC600A. I'm able to read the tape and extract files from it. However,
>>when I try to write to the tape using the command tar cv filename,
>>I get the message:
>>
>>a filename 1 blocks
>>tar: tape write error: Invalid argument
>>
>>I tried all sorts of different arguments but couldn't get tar to write
>>to tape. Please help.
>>-- 
>>Jack Hsiung
>>cvetp035@csupomona.edu
>
>
>The default device is for a DC6150 tape.  The drive can't write the
>higher format to a DC600.  You need to use the special device for
>the 120Mb format tapes.  If drive is rmt0 for instance,
>
>tar -cvf /dev/rmt0.6 ./*

This did the trick for me. Doesn't make much sense, but as long as it
works. BTW, the drive is 150mb.

Thanks.

>
>will retension the tape on open and rewind on close using the 
>120 Mb device.  I do it all the time with DC600.  Also, rdump
>needs some special parameters which I don't have at hand.  Mail
>me if you need them, but I won't be around for a couple of weeks.
>
>
>Dale
>
>-- 
>Dale A. Hubler  (216) 977-7014   hubler@lerc.nasa.gov
>Progress marches on, trampling everything in its path.

-- 
Jack Hsiung
cvetp035@csupomona.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Subject: monitor on AIX 3.2 (and other)
Organization: MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 07:37:02 GMT


[I'm probably going to set up a FSP server on my machine for people to
grab current versions of software, ported to AIX 3.2.  Except for Unzip
(for obvious reasons), everything will be in ZIP format, and will
include both source and binaries.  I'll post when I've done this.
Meanwhile, you may want to get a copy of FSP and Unzip from the local
FTP server at wombat.gnu.ai.mit.edu, in /tmp.]


Getting monitor (1.05.1) to compile and run cleanly on 3.2 required the
following changes:

-----8<-----snip-----8<-----snip-----8<-----snip-----8<-----snip-----8<-----
*** monitor.c~	Fri Oct 25 08:48:38 1991
--- monitor.c	Mon Apr  6 03:14:14 1992
***************
*** 471,478 ****
  	printw("%-2s%1d  %5.1f %5.1f kB/s",
  	       if1[i]->if_name,
  	       if1[i]->if_unit,
! 	       IFDELTA(i,ifInOctets)/1024.0/refresh_time,
! 	       IFDELTA(i,ifOutOctets)/1024.0/refresh_time);
  	i++;
      }
  }
--- 471,478 ----
  	printw("%-2s%1d  %5.1f %5.1f kB/s",
  	       if1[i]->if_name,
  	       if1[i]->if_unit,
! 	       IFDELTA(i,if_ibytes)/1024.0/refresh_time,
! 	       IFDELTA(i,if_obytes)/1024.0/refresh_time);
  	i++;
      }
  }
-----8<-----snip-----8<-----snip-----8<-----snip-----8<-----snip-----8<-----
From: gerth@watson.ibm.com (John Gerth)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: 3.1.5: Upper limit on virtual memory allocation
Keywords: vm limit
Date: 14 Apr 92 01:44:28 GMT
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM

Yes, AIX 3.2 does raise the data limit from 256M to (I believe) 2G.
Someone with personal experience of the mechanism should append
the details.

-- 
John Gerth	 gerth@watson.ibm.com		(914) 784-7639
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: gary@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com (Gary Henderson)
Subject: Re: how do I open tektronix window on AIX3.1 ?
Organization: Lockheed Missiles and Space Co.
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 21:49:13 GMT

In article <1992Apr03.170918.56374@yuma.acns.colostate.edu>
flatau@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Piotr Flatau) writes:

>How do I open tektronix window on my IBM RISC6000/320
>I tried 
>aixterm -tm tek4012
>
>do I need termcap for it ?
>
>Peter


We had the same problem, and asked our friendly IBM rep.
Guess what... aixterm doesn't support Tektronix emulation.
(BTW, xterm would take a -t for tek emulation, not -tm).
I double checked this in the aixterm man page.  Indeed,
Tektronix emulation is not mentioned.
Is this an 'enhancement'?
-- 
Gary J. Henderson
gary@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com
#include <std/disclaimer.h>
From: john@newave.mn.org (John A. Weeks III)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: How Do You Partition A Disk In AIX?
Date: 8 Apr 92 05:42:47 GMT
Organization: NeWave Communications Ltd, Lake Wobegon, MN

I just obtained an RS/6000 with two 400 M-Byte disks.  After
installing AIX 3.1.5, one of the disks appears to be all
set up with the standard partitions, plus an empty partition
called `u'.

The second disk does not appear to be set up in any way.  I 
cannot figure out how to make partitions on this disk, or
how to tell if there are any existing partitions on it that
are not mounted.  I also cannot find a `partitions' file in
the etc directory.  I was able to tell that the device is
configured as hdisk1 using smit (and that the disk with root
is hdisk0).

I have set up disks a number of times with SVR3 and a zillion
times on SunOS--but AIX does not seem to be like either of
these two UNIX systems.

Can someone give me some pointers or point me to a place in a
manual?  Smit seemed to be no help--it has a bunch of stuff on
logical volume groups, which seem to assume that you have the
partitions already made.

BTW, if I do manage to make partitions on the second disk, how
do I get them to be mounted automatically on bootup?  Is this
just an entry in the `filesystems' file, or does it have to be
coded in somewhere else?

I assume that I have to do some mkdev's, then mkfs, then mount,
but I cannot find docs on the proper device names for mkdev,
or the number of sectors for mkfs.

-john-

=============================================================================
John A. Weeks III               (612) 942-6969             john@newave.mn.org
NeWave Communications, Ltd.           ...uunet!umn-cs!kksys!tcnet!newave!john
From: vanneste@crim.ca (Martial Van Neste)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Client/Server between AIX (RS/6000) and CICS-MVS (IBM 390)
Date: 7 Apr 92 17:18:45 GMT
Organization: CGI Group

I have previously posted this article but i want to make some precisions
about the context. The sitation i describe is not the situation of
the Centre de recherche informatique de  Montreal or the CGI group,
it is the situation of one of my clients.

I am currently working on the design of a technological infrastructure
that will support several client/server applications between an IBM 390
with MVS an CICS, and a local platforms composed of thousands of
individual workstations. Currently, we have about 830 PC (25% Macintosh)
and more than 1600 3270 terminals that will be replaced by PC (PS/2).

People from IBM here are mainly pushing to use CICS on local OS/2 that
will work as application server for the workstations. This server
would route the resquests from the stations (using DBM and CM) into
CICS exec link to the mainframe.

Since OS/2 is not multiuser, and the security would be a complex mix and
match of LanServer, CICS on this server and on the mainframe, and also
that the performance on this local server will be limited to the PS/2,
i would like to present an other alternative.

The alternative would be to use an RS-6000(with AIX) on the local platform. 
The client applications would run on this machine and would communicate
with the mainframe with CICS or an RPC mecanism (using LU6.2). The
worstations could use the "corporate" applications thru Xwindow emulation
and would be isolated from local applications (word-processing, spreadsheet
etc). This will ease the integration of the Mac, OS/2, and Windows and
would be (i think) more secure. I have to say that the main purpose of
this is to have a GUI interface to corporate applications. These appliations
will be reconstruted from the ground to answers the news needs of the
corporation. It is clearly stated that all the "corporate" data will stay
on the mainframe. (By the way it is a "blue blood" corporation).

THE QUESTIONS ARE :

1. Is there any configuration like this (working or being planned) ?
   (I would like to have a short description of the enviroment)

2. Could someone from the AIX group in IBM give me some help because
   local rep. are heavily OS/2 minded ?
  (This help could be treated anonymously :-), if you prefer...

3. Does someone ever use the alternate authentification method that is
   available in SMIT to get this authentification from a mainframe
   using a LU6.2 request to ACF/2 or RACF ?

You can mail me the answers to me and i could post a summary later.

Thank you in advance for your reply and excuse me for my english ...

Martial Van Neste
CGI Group
5300 blvd. des Galeries
Suite #300
Quebec city
Quebec, Canada   G6V 6H3

tel. (418) 623-0101
Fax. (418) 623-4114

E-MAIL :

vanneste@crim.ca
From: srs@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Scott R. Stonefield)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: What do you do with a 1000 groupies?
Keywords: groups, system administration, getgrent
Date: 10 Apr 92 12:57:10 GMT
Organization: North Carolina State University

leonard@aix3090b.uky.edu (Leonard Lauria) writes:

>In addition to the above questions....has anyone devised a "batch"
>type mode to add users and AIX370?  We can query our SIS system
>to automatically select students that have left, or joined the
>university, and should either have userids deleted or added.  This
>works now with our CMS and Prime systems, and looks possible with
>the RS6000s (though there are warnings about how to do this when        
>running NIS or YPs.  But I don't see an easy way to do it all on
>AIX370, and IBM has been little help so far.

	I have writen a program which will add bulk users from a 
input file for RS\6000 running AIX 3.1.5.  I have not yet tested it
on AIX 3.2 but it should work.  The program also sets a password
which is also in the input file. (ie we use the Student's ID number for
the default password.)  


If anyone would like a copy of the source just send some E-mail and I 
will mail you the source.


>So, has anyone done the above?  :)

>thanks!

>Leonard

-scott


..
Scott Stonefield
NCSU Enginnering Computer Operations
Applications Analyst Programmer
Xref: sparky comp.unix.aix:5299 comp.unix.aux:1784
From: robson@apple.com (J. Robson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.aux
Subject: programmers wanted
Date: 9 Apr 92 22:52:47 GMT
Followup-To: comp.unix.aix
Organization: Apple Computer

FYI, A company called CIScorp is looking for AIX and A/UX programmers.
I'm posting this for a friend, so please call them rather than responding
to me.  The person to contact is Scott Peters, at 408-253-2600.  I know
this is pretty generic, but if you're even half interested, give them a call!
:-)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv286,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith Smith)
Subject: Re: Computone ATvantage/Intelliport - Microport V/AT Driver Needed!
Organization: Keith's Computer, Hope Mills, NC
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 92 21:11:34 GMT
Keywords: COMPUTONE MICROPORT 80286 DEVICE DRIVER

I TRIED to write you via E-mail, I will post.

I TRIED to warn you away from AT-4 card.  It WILL NOT RUN THE MODEM AT
19200 BAUD.  It will work GREAT for a TERMINAL though.  You will need a
custom cable to use a modem.  Do Not use a standard null modem.  Do you
have the one with RJ-45's?  You will need a slightly different cable.

9600 is MAX baud on ATVantage boards.
-- 
Keith Smith          uunet!ksmith!keith            5719 Archer Rd.
Digital Designs      BBS 1-919-423-4216            Hope Mills, NC 28348-2201
Somewhere in the Styx of North Carolina ...
Xref: sparky comp.unix.sysv286:87 comp.unix.sysv386:8340 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:13412
From: chris@ukelele.UUCP (Chris Linstruth)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv286,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Computone ATvantage/Intelliport - Microport V/AT Driver Needed!
Summary: Used to be supported, but Computone can't help.
Keywords: COMPUTONE MICROPORT 80286 DEVICE DRIVER
Date: 7 Apr 92 22:43:44 GMT
Organization: GAU Technologies, Fairfax County, VA

I'm faced with a dilemma.  I have obtained, from a friend, a
Computone ATvantage-4.  The board is in good shape and has
Interactive/AT&T Release 3.2 drivers included.  Here is an excerpt
from one of the NOTES_*  files:

> Operating Systems Supported:
>
> IBM Xenix V
> SCO Xenix V 286 (version 2.2 & higher)
> SCO Xenix V 386 (version 2.2 & higher) (including vpix) (AT & PS2)
> Interactive 386 (including vpix) (AT & PS2)
> AT&T 386        (including Simul_Task)
> Microport 386   (including Dos Merge)
> Microport 286

I need the Microport 286 (better known as V/AT) drivers for the
ATvantage/Intelliport (both boards use the same driver distributions).

I have spent the better part of a week playing phone tag with Computone
trying to get the driver disk.  They "No longer support Microport 286
and are unable to provide the driver disk."  I'm certainly glad that I
didn't spend good money a while back and need a replacement disk due
to unforseen circumstances!  I'm not even going to get into what I
think of Computone's technical support department.

I even tried Microport to see if they had one lying around.  No dice.

Anyway, if you have, or know someone who has what looks like this
driver I would really like to hear from you.  I would REALLY like to
get my new modem pumping 14.4K vice 9600...

Thanks in advance!

Chris
-- 
Chris Linstruth            ___   __           The Genuine Aloha Ukelele
GAU Technologies          /   \_/  \______OO     (703) 960-8428 * 4
chris@ukelele.UUCP        |   (_)   ______##      2400/1200  N-8-1
mimsy!ihost!ukelele!chris \___/ \__/      OO    UNIX For The Masses!