HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: most underated actress/actor
Date: 18 Dec 92 03:09:44 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

In article <1634@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM>, lsnow@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM 
(Linda Snow) writes:

> 1. You *were* aware that she won an Oscar for Ghost, weren't you?  This
> does not usually indicate an underrated performer.

True, I thought her performance in _Ghost_ (in fact the whole film) was 
*far* OVERrated.

> 2. She's incredibly popular -- do you know anyone who doesn't love her? Well
> maybe my ex-husband but he doesn't count, he has no taste.

I can't stand her let alone lover her...I think she's an annoying actress,
and I have never found her stand-up comedy funny.

All the above is IMHO, feel free to disagee, won't bother me.

Greg Bole                            "Don't shrug you moron, I'm blind!
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu          Save the body languare for the bimbae."
                                        Al Pacino in _Scent of a Woman_
From: 00beseymoure@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: BASIC INSTINCT and feminism (*spoilers*)
Date: 14 Dec 92 23:00:29 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

Cath
Cattherine

Ccatherine killed everyone.
the director came to ball state and told us.In article <1992Dec10.195037.28039@seas.gwu.edu>, gritz@seas.gwu.edu (Larry Gritz) writes:
> In article <1g5qi9INN58v@roundup.crhc.uiuc.edu> jlzhong@stereo.csl.uiuc.edu (Jialin Zhong) writes:
>>
>>Who is the killer? I happen to think both of them are, but I am not sure.
>>Any conclusions from experts?
> 
> Yes!  Both the guy I saw the movie with and I were so confused that we
> sat down with paper afterwards and tried to figure it out.
> 
> We concluded that pretty much everybody killed somebody.  
> 
> Spoilers follow...
> 
> 
> 
> Okay, it's been quite a while, but my list looks like:
> 
> Catherine killed:  her parents, the rock star, maybe the psych professor
> Beth killed: her husband, Gus, Neilson, maybe the psych professor
> Roxy killed: her brothers, and tried to kill Nick
> Nick killed: Beth, Roxy, the tourists
> 
> There was considerable contention over who was killed by Catherine and
> who was killed by Beth.
> 
> Anybody have any good reasons why my theory is incorrect?
> 
> 	-- lg
> 
> --
> Larry Gritz,   gritz@seas.gwu.edu	  Dept. of EE & CS
> The George Washington University          801  22nd St. NW, Rm. T-624G
> (202) 994-0460 (voice) -0227 (fax)	  Washington, DC 20052
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: hughes@dogwood.botany.uga.edu (Wayne Hughes)
Subject: Re: The Culkinator! Was: Re: JACOBs LADDER
Organization: Botany Department - U of Georgia, Athens
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 23:31:03 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.201440.9027@meiko.com> lorreen@meiko.com (Lorreen Pelletier) writes:

>I agree, the Home Alone movies are crap.  But I think Culkin, whether you
>like him or not, is a talented actor.  Unfortunately, to satisfy the
>current pop market for "cute" and mindless, he's been give some pretty
>poor vehicles. 
>
>A couple of examples of movies in which he's given very good, not too
>precocious, performances are "Parents" (I think), with Steve Martin, and
>Uncle Buck (with John Candy).
>
>
   But in UNCLE BUCK, he was really a very minor character; John Candy
   and the daughter were definitely the major characters.  The PARENTS
   I'm familiar with is a dark comedy dealing with cannibalism and
   has Randy Quaid, Mary Beth Hurt (I think) and I'm not sure who 
   does the excellent role of the kid, but it's not Culkin.  Don't
   know what movie you mean with Steve Martin.

   I just saw JACOB'S LADDER again, and watched Culkin carefully.
   Admittedly it's also a minor role, but I think what annoyed me
   here is true for all his movies.  He *over*acts.  That is, his
   role is as cute li'l kid in all of this stuff, and he overplays
   it distressingly.  He becomes *precious*, *precocious* li'l
   kid, and it makes *me*, anyway, want to rip his face off.

   JACOB'S LADDER for me would be a near-perfect movie construction,
   were it not for Culkin whose appearance utterly jars me, and
   for the last 15 minutes or so, which was a segment completely
   unnecessary and very poorly done.

   all IMO, of course, but not IMHO! 

   Wayne
From: kate@wavefront.wti.com (Kathy Samec)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Best?  Favorite? (was: Top Five Movies of All Time)
Date: 17 Dec 92 23:23:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: wavefron.840
Organization: Wavefront Technologies Inc, Santa Barbara, CA
X-Disclaimer: Not a spokesperson for Wavefront Technologies, Inc.

I think that there is a different from what you think are the best movies
and what is a favorite also. 

What I think were the best:

China Town
Casablanca
Dead Again
Dead Poets Society
Rear Window

There are more but I thought I'd stay in the restraints

Favorites:

Lady and Tramp
Music Man
King of Hearts
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Sound of Music
Lost Boys
Sex Lies, Vidiotapes
Back to the Future 1 and 3
Philidelphia Story
Fried Green Tomatoes


Least Favorites
Anything by Oliver Stone
Anything by Falini(Sp?)
Lawn Mower Man
Neighbors
Cool World

Just my .02
-- 
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Kathi Samec			- Everything is beautiful and
Santa Barbara Studios		  Nothing hurt.
kate@wti.com					-Stoney Stevenson
From: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: 1992? it was a bad ye
Date: 13 Dec 92 16:15:01 EST
Reply-To: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

CLI>Are we all agreed that this hasn't been a terribly good year in terms
CLI>of OSCAR QUALITY GREAT FILMS(tm)?

     The first half of this year - as well as nearly all of 1991 - saw a
     dearth of truly good movies.  However, this fall we've seen a batch
     of films that, IMHO, salvage 1992 and make it a year of GOOD movies.
     In the space of several weeks, I saw such superb movies as HOWARDS
     END, UNFORGIVEN, A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME, A RIVER RUNS THROUGH IT,
     and HUSBANDS AND WIVES.  We still have HOFFA being released on
     Christmas, and I'm looking forward to seeing MALCOLM X (whenever the
     theater isn't sold out on a night when I'm free).

     And there's ALADDIN, too, which despite its flaws is the most FUN
     I've had at the movies all year.  I'm glad I saw it.
---
  SLMR 2.1a  "Ad Nausaeum:" Commercials that make you puke.
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA
From: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: want info on the love
Date: 16 Dec 92 07:27:41 EST
Reply-To: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

MC>How old is the girl who plays in The Lover?  And what is her name...

     Her name is Jane March, and she was seventeen when she starred in
     THE LOVER.  That should get the attention of the hormone-crazed
     teenagers on this conference (and other ages, too).

     The age of her character was supposed to be fifteen, but it was
     changed to eighteen so that the movie could receive an R rating
     instead of an NC-17.  As usual, the rating makes no sense.
---
  SLMR 2.1a  Sometimes I miss my Mom...then I reload.
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA
From: st1sq@Rosie.UH.EDU (Charles Foster Kane)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: INTERVISTA
Date: 15 Dec 1992 07:36:45 GMT
Organization: University of Houston
Reply-To: st1sq@Rosie.UH.EDU
NNTP-Posting-Host: rosie.uh.edu

Does anyone know when or if _Intervista_ will be coming to Houston, Texas ?

And if it is not coming to Houston, what is the closest town that will be
getting it ?

Please e-mail me!

Thanks!
From: lsnow@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Linda Snow)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Gas Food Lodging
Date: 17 Dec 92 17:46:04 GMT
Reply-To: lsnow@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Linda Snow)
Organization: NCR E&M CLEMSON Liberty, SC

I remember hearing about this a while back and thinking it was one
of the best titles I'd ever heard.  Is it out now? Who's in it and
what's it about?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: citrin@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Wayne Citrin)
Subject: Re: What is Molly Ringwald doing
Keywords: molly ringwald
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:52:25 GMT

In article <Bz9uwG.DtL@news.cso.uiuc.edu> wogg0743@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (William Shakespeare) writes:
>The Mollster was recently in an international film called _Night on Earth_.
>She played, I believe, a female New York cabbie.  I haven't seen the movie,
>so I can't comment on quality, but it is by the same guy who did _Stranger
>than Paradise_.
>

Sorry, that was Winona Ryder, not Molly Ringwald. And she played a Los Angeles
cabbie.  Director was Jim Jarmusch.

Wayne

-----------
Wayne Citrin   citrin@soglio.colorado.edu   citrin@cs.colorado.edu
From: d40937@aiken (Jean Yves Desbiens)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: most underated actress/actor
Date: 17 Dec 92 19:14:31 GMT
Organization: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Ivy Blumberg (ivy@chem.ucsd.edu) wrote:
: In article <CBOLTON.92Dec17005146@csd475a.erim.org> cbolton@csd475a.erim.org (Chris Bolton) writes:
: >
: >  I've liked John Cusack in everything he's ever done (with the possible
: I agree--I think he's great too.
: >
: >  I'll have to think about the actresses, but a preliminary pick would be
: >Karen Allen...
:  I agree here too.  After Indiana Jones she seemed to disappear except
: for a few roles (i.e. Starman, which I liked)

Karen Allen had a role in Scrooged (Bill Murray also starred) 
a wonderfull holiday classic.

--
SEIZE THE DAY, MAKE YOUR LIFE EXTRAORDINARY .  "Dead Poets Society"

Jean-Yves Desbiens                  | d40937@info.polymtl.ca
Etudiant en genie informatique      | 
Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal Can | To indeed be a god ...,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: clueless@bradley.edu (Mark Kristie)
Subject: What's this movie?
Organization: J. Random Misconfigured Site
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 00:48:25 GMT
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
X-Posted-From: cs1.bradley.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

	I saw a commercial for this movie a while ago, but I forgot the name...
the commercial showed some kind of SDI system that had been put in place in \
space in the future, which was supposed to protect against anything.  The only
problem was that it was malfunctioning or something like that, and somebody
(the hero, presumably) was supposed to go and kill it....

any ideas?

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: anderson@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu (Chris Anderson)
Subject: Re: What is Molly Ringwald doing
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 19:20:52 GMT
Keywords: molly ringwald

In <Bz05FJ.7uz@news.cso.uiuc.edu> anderson@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu (Chris 
Anderson) writes:


>What is Molly Ringwald doing these days?

...and all I get are adolescent inanities which provide no information.
Perhaps I should rephrase the question.

Is Molly Ringwald currently working on any film or television projects?
Is she still alive?

Please be constructive.

Chris Anderson
anderson@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: patk@sr.hp.com (Patrick Kearney)
Subject: Re: Good 1st time, not second
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 16:03:42 GMT
Organization: HP Sonoma County (SRSD/MWTD/MID)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.9 PL6]


To reverse the original question, there are some films that I
disliked when I first saw them, but enjoyed on subsequent viewings.
In fact, one film -- Billy Wilder's "Kiss Me, Stupid" -- is, oddly,
good and bad on alternative viewings, starting with a definite
'bad' when I first saw it. (I forget where I am with this one at
present.)

The most marked reversal, though, is with Cukor's version of "A
Star is Born". I loathed this when I first saw it on its original
release in England, and in fact walked out and waited for my parents
in the foyer until it was over. When I saw it later, at the urging of
a friend, at the National Film Theatre in London, I was completely
amazed by the film, and immediately elevated it to my top ten list
where it has been ever since.

Funny the way one's taste changes, innit?
--

**********************************     "Kill one man, you're a murderer.
Patrick Kearney			 *  	Kill a thousand, you're a hero.
C/O Hewlett-Packard		 *	Kill everyone, you're God."
1400 Fountaingrove Parkway       *                             - Rostand.
Santa Rosa, CA 95403.		 *
				 *
INTERNET: patk@hpwmsaw.sr.HP.COM *
TELNET: 577-3460                 *
**********************************
From: micwall@student.ecok.ecu (Wallace Michael)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jurassic Park
Date: 15 Dec 92 16:41:46 GMT
Organization: East Central University, Ada, Oklahoma

In article <1geru2INN7aq@aludra.usc.edu> rhogan@aludra.usc.edu (Ron Hogan) writes:
>My opinion on why Steven Spielberg won't do the film justice is that the
>book has a definite dark, cynical bitter side, and a pretty good version
>of chaos theory, all of which will probably be lost in the shiny happy
>version that Spielberg is bound to make (and I base this on my experiences
>with Spielberg films *and* the Jurassic Park trailer, now in theatres all
>over the nation).  Though he probably can get the famous actor the book
>says they got for the tape on the boat (Richard Harris?)
>
>Ron Hogan
>rhogan@usc.edu
>
>(of course, I'll have to get out of film school first...)
>

Didn't Speilberg do the original Jaws movie?  As I recall, it is
fairly dark.

micwall@student.ecok
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Most SHOCKING film in my childhood
From: whan@eagle.wesleyan.edu
Date: 20 Dec 92 08:08:07 EST
Organization: Wesleyan University

In article <1992Dec18.202129.19618@cs.mun.ca>, matthew@cs.mun.ca (Matthew J. Newhook) writes:
> I think my childhood had two shocking experiences.
> 
> One was a movie called Giant Ant (I think).  This was about giant ants (as
> you can imagine) taking over the world.  I couldn't watch the end, and had
> nightmares for weeks.
> 
> The next was an episode of House of Hamer (is that right) Horror.  It was
> an espisode about a man who believed he had demons in his dead, and decided
> to let them by drilling a hole in his head.  Needless to say this killed him,
> and the doctor who investigated him was the next victim...
> 
> Powerful stuff to a 9 year old!
> 
> Matthew
> -- 
> Matthew Newhook (matthew@engr.mun.ca)       |  "...get on with the fascination
> Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science  |  the real relation, the underlying
> Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada |  theme" - Limelight, Rush

I think you may be referring to the classic science fiction film, THEM!.  It,
of course is about the alien invasion of huge ants; indeed, this movie managed
to scare me when I was young as well.


WHAN@eagle.wesleyan.edu
From: v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: DEAD POET'S SOCIETY 2
Date: 16 Dec 92 00:09:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <00965208.9BECC5C0@vms.csd.mu.edu>, 2715gibsonr@vms.csd.mu.edu writes...
>IF YOU HAVE EVER SEEN DEAD POETS, YOU KNOW HOW GREAT THE MOVIE WAS.  ANYWAYS, ABO, 
>A FEW YEARS AGO, ROBIN WILLIAMS STATED THAT HE PLANNED TO MAKE DEAD POETS 2.
>DOES ANYBODY KNOW IF HE STILL PLANS TO CARRY THROUGH WITH HIS STATEMENT.  AS
>WELL AS, DOES ANYONE KNOW IF HE IS GOING TO MAKE GOOD MORNING VIETNAM 2?

     Not that I'm calling you a liar or anything, but Williams is
     a generally tasteful actor, and, of course, he has never actually
     made a sequel in his life... so if you are recalling the quote
     correctly, I'd say it was made in sarcasm or the interviewer
     placed it out of context.

     Barry Levinson did nearly make GOOD MORNING, CHICAGO starring
     Williams, a sequel to GOOD MORNING, VIETNAM, but it was put
     into turnaround less than six months before shooting was 
     scheduled to begin.  I don't konw why.

     Scott
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: kmr2r@Virginia.EDU ("karen roark")
Subject: Re: Keanu Reeves (was: yet another on DRACULA)
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 23:19:57 GMT

it was artistic
From: spongebo@cithara.login.qc.ca (THE EYE-BALL KID)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Watchmen
Date: 17 Dec 92 17:19:35 GMT
Organization: Organ Grinders Monkeys Union With Penguins As Mascots

sterbenc@ivhs.mot.com (Joe Sterbenc) writes:

> In article <1992Dec14.135334.6226@fwi.uva.nl>, schaper@fwi.uva.nl (Lancelot
> Schaper) wrote:
> > 
> > Can anybody tell me what's true about the rumours of the making of Watchmen
> > the movie?
> 
> Me too me too me too. Any and all info.
> 
> My casting thoughts:
> 
> Comedian - Nicholson is almost too obvious
> Doctor Manhattan - could he be animated?
> Ozymandais - William Hurt with fake muscles
> Laura Juspecyk (sp?) - not sure
> Night Owl - probably not realistic, but John Goodman would LOOK perfect
> Rorschach - no idea - Daniel Day-Lewis? he's done everything else...
> 
> Is it true that Terry Gilliam is directing?

Well, these rumours have been flying for a LONG time -- ever since the Sam Ham
Batman script included Robin (and it was better than the final piece of crud
they put out!).

This is what I have heard:

Gilliam WAS developing it, and may still be.

Roarsharch (sp) might be MICKEY ROARK (sp) -- an EXCELLENT casting choice IMHO.


Spongebo - THE EYE-BALL KID (:::::-)

spongebo@cithara.login.qc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: cro6e@Virginia.EDU ("Charles Robert Odell")
Subject: Re: Oscars: Let's do it right (was Re: 1992?  It was a bad year....)
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:37:14 GMT

re : oscar nominations

Best Picture 
 Unforgiven
 Aladdin
 Howards End
 A Few Good Men
 The Player
(im not saying these are the best, just the ones likely to be
nominated)

Best Art Design
 Batman Returns (Looks great)
 Toys (From ads, looks incredible)
 Dracula (His castle is a masterpiece. The outside, that is)
 Howards End (Historical period piece, and all that..)
From: u1am@ohm.york.ac.uk (Aled Morris - H601/91)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: test- please ignore
Keywords: fred
Date: 18 Dec 92 10:42:12 GMT
Organization: Electronics Department, University of York, UK

this is a test please ignore
From: 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: A FEW GOOD MEN
Date: 20 Dec 1992 17:43:13 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

In article <1992Dec18.234110.29584@nosc.mil>, barrus@cod.nosc.mil writes:
>
>In article <shorts.724710838@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu> news@news.cs.brandeis.edu (USENET News System) writes:
>>>Just an observation:
>>>The description/synopsis I have seen of this film looks like
>>>if it is a remake of "A Soldier's Story". Or perhaps some
>>>other movie (I am in Sweden and the titles are translated
>>>here... can't remember the title of the other movie). Anyway,
>>>the storyline sounds VERY familiar.
>>>Anyone know?
>>


It's not really the same story since in A Soldier's Story we don't
know who did it.  In Few Good Men we all know who did it and why.
Also, the racial overtones (a huge part of Soldier's Story) were
not there in FGM.  Don't go see A Few Good Men expecting to see
a remake of a Soldier's Story.  As I said, the story is different
and also, a FGM is a much lighter, funnier film.  They're both very
good films (Soldier's Story better IMHO).

Mary H.
From: bjones@denitqm.uswest.com (Brent Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: French movies (sigh!)    :-Q
Date: 11 Dec 92 19:30:54 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Organization: U S WEST Information Technologies

In article <1992Dec11.001527.6374@csc.ti.com>, simon@wotangate.sc.ti.com
(Jean-Yves Simon) wrote:
> 
[snip]
> 
> I stop there. It's been 3 years that I am living in US, and during this time, I saw 5 french
> movies, 5 french movies released in US in 3 years! One Italian movie (Mediteranneo : I guess because
> it won the oscar for the best foreign movie) in 3 years!
> Do get me wrong, I like US movies but I am sick of the poor choice (by that I mean the diversity
> of seeing foreign movies) that the theaters have to offer me.

It does depend somewhat where you live. I live in Boulder, Colorado,
and between the local universty's International Film Series, a local
theatre that runs a few foreign films, and three or for really good
"art" theatres in nearby Denver, we probably have access to as many
foreign films as anyone could want. The University of Colorado program
is especially good, and in the past year or two has shown Eastern
European films, Japanese films, Chinese films, and what I would guess
to be the majority of the films produced in Western Europe. All with
subtitles, of course.

The ironic thing is that the worst American films (Arnold, Stallone, et al)
are all exported to other countries and garner fantastic amounts of money
(as they do here), but only the best foreign films come here and
generally do poorly. No accounting for taste, I suppose, but whenever
I'm in Paris and see the *huge* billboards for the latest American
action blockbuster, I wish the exchange was a little more
equitable.

--
Brent Jones, Lead Tech. Editor, U S WEST IT, bjones@denitqm.uswest.com
"of beautiful weeds that cannot hide from the farmer and helplessly have 
to watch the shadow of his simian stoop leave mangled flowers in its wake, 
as the monstrous darkness approaches."--V. Nabokov _Signs and Symbols_
From: ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge A. Diaz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Good 1st time, not second
Date: 13 Dec 92 09:20:32 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <98#rnc=@lynx.unm.edu> lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble) writes:
>cew2w@Virginia.EDU ("Chris Wrike") writes:

>> By the way, I thought "Batman" was really good the first time I saw it
>> and I've pretty much hated it ever since. 

>Me too.  The first time was great, enough to make me go a second time in the
>theatre, and the second time I wanted to be *anywhere* but someplace where
>I had to watch that movie.  Huuuuurgh.

Well, I'm probably going to get flamed into oblivion, but....

Terminator 2:  Judgement Day

The first time I saw it, I got really caught up in the action, and I
thought the special effects were great.  But I left the theatre feeling
kinda bad about it.  I went back to see it the second time, and I
just didn't like it at all....

Flame away, it's been a cold December. :-)


-- 
Jorge Diaz                       | "I want you to remember, Clark... in all
Georgia Institute of Technology  |  the years to come, in your most private
Office of Information Technology |  moments...my hand at your throat.  I want
ccoprdj@prism.gatech.edu         |  you to remember the one man who beat you."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies