HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Missing documentation - KBD, MOU and VIO
Date: 8 Sep 92 23:48:18 GMT
Organization: DAFCO: OS/2 Software Support & Consulting

There is a section on calling 16-bit code functions in the C SEt/2
User's Guide S10G-4444-00.

-- 
Dave Feustel N9MYI <feustel@netcom.com>
 
RE Drug Warriors who enjoy making a "good" bust: I'm sure the Salem
Witch Hunters enjoyed their law enforcement achievements too.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: msmith@netcom.com (Martin P. Smith)
Subject: Re: Does new DPMI fix work with Zortech C DOS extender?
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 05:48:54 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <q4xn91d.jps@netcom.com> jps@netcom.com (John Serafin) writes:
>
>Does anyone know whether the recent DPMI fix that allows 
>Microsoft C 7.0 to run in a VDM include the fix that allows the
>Zortech DOS extender to run in a VDM?
>The README file only mentions MS C.
>Also, does anyone know the reason that the original DPMI fix was never posted
>to hobbes or the IBM ftp site and/or why Symantec was told that they could
>not post it to their BBS?
>-- 
>John P. Serafin  |  Operating a bicycle is more like driving than riding.
>jps@netcom.com   |  Operating an automobile is more like riding than driving.

I yes the DPMI fix works for the DOS extender. Can't answer as to why thei
 original wasn't posted but the fix  is at software.watson.ibm.com now.

MArtin Smith
msmith@netcom.com

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: PD or shareware Common Lisp?
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:19:13 GMT

In article <60277@mimsy.umd.edu> asgeir@cs.umd.edu (Asgeir Karl Olafsson) writes:
>Is there a PD or shareware Common Lisp available for OS/2?

An OS/2 LISP arose out of a Byte Magazine project not too long ago.
You can obtain it via anonymous ftp from ftp-os2.nmsu.edu.

There are commercial implementations, of course, as well.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST is avail. from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/faq.
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | Or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP").
of Chicago, 60637       | Family Values Means a Job
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: db3l@ans.net (David Bolen)
Subject: Re: Icons in the title bar (a la EPM in ring enabled mode)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 17:18:35 GMT
Distribution: comp.os.os2.programmer
Organization: Advanced Network & Services, Inc. - Elmsford, NY

In article <1992Sep10.192335.36146@watson.ibm.com> Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com> writes:

>   Process the WM_FORMATFRAME message by calling the frame's default
>   windowproc, and you'll get back an array of SWP structures equivalent
>   to the value you returned for WM_QUERYFRAMECTLCOUNT.  The last n are
>   for the ones you added, and are there for formatting the controls you
>   want to add.

I almost posted something close to this until I realized that I didn't know
if the last n SWP structures were definitely for me.  Just out of curiosity,
what happens in the case where the frame window is already subclassed by
some other set of special controls (say you're using a library that provides
a frame with other new controls)?  Are your own SWP structures still last,
or is there a way to definitely find those that were allocated for your use
(check for 0 HWNDs maybe)?

--
-- David
--
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------\
 \              David Bolen             \  Internet: db3l@ans.net      /
  |   Advanced Network & Services, Inc.   \   Phone: (914) 789-5327   |
 / 100 Clearbrook Road, Elmsford, NY 10523  \   Fax: (914) 789-5310    \
\-----------------------------------------------------------------------/
From: joe2@vnet.ibm.com
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 92 11:34:29 FST
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: DosDevIOCtl
Reply-To: <joe2@vnet.ibm.com>
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0

In <1992Sep7.014647.4906@news.Hawaii.Edu> Dave Tholen writes:
>I have a 16-bit OS/2 application that I would like to recompile for 32-bit
>OS/2.  This application currently uses KbdCharIn to retrieve keystrokes
>from the keyboard.  There is no 32-bit version of KbdCharIn, though it
>appears that DosDevIOCtl, Category 4, Function 74H, "Read Character Data
>Records" may be a satisfactory substitute.
>
>I have documentation for the 16-bit DosDevIOCtl in the form of Ray Duncan's
>book and the include files for the 16-bit compiler, but all I have at the
>moment for the 32-bit DosDevIOCtl are the include files for the 32-bit
>compiler.  Both Duncan's book and the include file list five arguments to
>the 16-bit DosDevIOCtl, but the 32-bit compiler's include file lists nine
>arguments.  I've concluded that DosDevIOCtl has been changed and that I
>need more documentation before attempting to determine whether DosDevIOCtl
>will serve as a replacement for KbdCharIn.  Calling the 16-bit KbdCharIn
>API from the 32-bit version of the program is an alternative that I'd like
>to avoid, because my compiler doesn't support it at this time.
>
>For a short term solution, can somebody tell me what the syntax is for the
>32-bit DosDevIOCtl call?  For a long term solution, can somebody recommend
>an OS/2 2.0 counterpart to Ray Duncan's book?
>
>

   Since there is no OS/2 V2 counterpart of Ray Duncan's book (yet?).
But you can buy the "OS/2 2.0 Technical Library: volume Control Program
Reference". You have all the DosXXX calls documented.
   The IOCTLs are documented in the volume "Physical Device Driver Reference".

   -Joel Armengaud
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Distribution: jadpc2
Date: Tue,  8 Sep 92 13:22:00 -0800
From: Joe_Meakin@f514.n202.z1.fidonet.org
Subject: Missing documentation -
Comment-To: Hale_Landis@f514.n202.z1.fidonet.org
Reply-To: Joe_Meakin@f514.n202.z1.fidonet.org
X-FSC-PATH: 202/514

On 7 Sept., Hale Landis makes the observation:

[...]

HL>Now for the real reason for this posting:  I notice that a number
HL>of people are posting questions about this and no one seems to
HL>have the definitive answer:  an IBM manual to refer to!

HL>IBMer's:  You really didn't overlook these important functions
HL>when creating the OS/2 2.0 manuals, did you?

Another example:  In the Toolkit on-line docs, there's NOTHING on
DevHelp.

How do they expect newbies like myself to figure this stuff out?  I
had to
go to 3rd party books to get this stuff!

Regards, Joe Meakin
___
 * MR/2 1.2x NR * Dime:  a dollar with all the taxes taken out.

--- Maximus/2 2.01wb
 * Origin: OS/2 Connection @ La Jolla, CA  <619-558-9475> (1:202/514)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: chr@bio129.uni-bielefeld.de (Christian Bartling)
Subject: Insufficient Stack Space
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 08:20:10 GMT
Organization: Universitaet Bielefeld
Keywords: Stack, GCC 2.2.2, C++

Hi,

I have some problems eihter with the link386 program, or with the GNU C++  
compiler itself. I programmed a small application, which consists mainly  
of three loops. It`s not a PM application. Everytime when running the  
program, it gets killed by OS/2 at a certain point with the message of "  
insufficient stack space". Increasing the stack space on the link386  
command line with the option "/STACK:xxxxx" does`t help. Is there a way to  
get the program running under OS/2 ???

Some addintional information:

The same C++ source gets compiled under Next-Mach with the GNU compiler  
GCC 2.1 and runs just fine. Also under MSDOS and Borland C++ there are no  
problems. What`s going on ??

---
Christian Bartling
chr@bio128.uni-bielefeld.de
From: tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Paranoia and OS/2 2.0
Date: 15 Sep 92 04:36:30 GMT
Organization: University of Hawaii

I FTPd the "paranoia" math testing program from research.att.com and gave
it try on my OS/2 2.0 machine.  I have both Microsoft FORTRAN 5.1 and
WATCOM F77/386 9.01b (that is, the B-level patches have been applied).

First of all, neither the double nor single precision version crashes
OS/2, regardless of which compiler was used.  I wonder why others have
experienced crashes.

Second, WATCOM passes with flying colors on the double precision test.
On the single precision test, as well as both precisions with the Microsoft
compiler, the program is unable to properly determine the radix, so the
slew of defect messages that follow are presumably consequences of this.
It looks to me like the program is fooled into thinking there are more
significant digits than there really are, because of the wrong radix, so
many of the defect messages seem to be triggered by inappropriate
comparisons.

Third, I didn't try either compiler with optimization disabled.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: cnadler@vnet.ibm.com (Cliff Nadler)
Subject: Re: BASIC on OS/2?
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 92 16:46:18 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.11 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: cnadler@vnet.ibm.com (Cliff Nadler)
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research

In  <1992Sep5.151303.18737@rock.concert.net>  rls@tip.wedge.nt.com (Robert L. Smith) writes:
> 
>     How do you run BASIC under OS/2 2.0?

1) DO NOT try to run BASIC or BASICA under OS/2 if you do not have an IBM BIOS.

2) Boot a DOS diskette using the Boot from Drive A object in the Command
   Prompts folder. You can then use GWBASIC from there.

3) Create a diskette with DOS and GWBASIC. Have it's autoexec.bat call GWBASIC
   at init. Use VMDISK to create a diskette image. Create an object with the
   DOS_STARTUP_DRIVE = filename of the diskette image you just created. You
   can then run GWBASIC to your heart's delight.

4) Use QBASIC.EXE in the bootdrive:\OS2\MDOS directory.

Any of these options will do fine.

--
Cliff Nadler (cnadler@vnet.ibm.com)
IBM Federal Systems Company - TEAM OS/2

Disclaimer: This post represents the views of the poster, not IBM Corporation.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: alexande@genghis.borland.com (Mark Alexander)
Subject: Re: Missing documentation - KBD, MOU and VIO
Originator: alexande@genghis.borland.com
Organization: Borland International
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 17:26:35 GMT


A good source for this information is the _Microsoft OS/2 Programmer's
Reference, Volume 3_, published by Microsoft Press in 1989.  You used
to be able to buy this in bookstores, but I don't know if it's still
in print.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: OS/2 vs NT somewhere else
From: browland@vax1.umkc.edu
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 01:41:47 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Kansas City

Please make arrangements to place your observations
of a released OS (I use it at work for work) vs a
smoke and mirror FUD product at a site that those
of us (not I) who wish to spend more bandwith than
alt...binaries does can get it.

Thank you
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: PD or shareware Common Lisp?
Date: 15 Sep 92 16:47:14 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <60277@mimsy.umd.edu> asgeir@cs.umd.edu (Asgeir Karl Olafsson) writes:
>Is there a PD or shareware Common Lisp available for OS/2?

Xlisp exists.  Ftp into ftp-os2.nmsu.edu.  Look in
/pub/os2/all/programming.  Download os2xlisp.zoo.  It is a Lisp
implementation, but I don't know how much of Common Lisp has been
implemented with it.



-- 
David Charlap         |"there aren't 50,000 things for which it's worth writing
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu| software; and the computer industry doesn't have enough
----------------------+ programmers to create that much good software.
Therefore, most of it must be worthless" -- Boris Beizer "The Frozen Keyboard"
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.misc
From: msmith@netcom.com (Martin P. Smith)
Subject: Re: ZC++ DOSX programs in DOS window?
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 92 04:19:58 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <1992Sep8.194606.1@uwovax.uwo.ca> mcyze@uwovax.uwo.ca writes:
>
>
>I cannot seem to run my Zortech C++ (32-bit) DOSX compiled programs
>in a DOS window (either fullscreened or windowed).  I constantly
>get "DPMI operating system error" as an error message.
>By the tone of this message, I suspect that Zortech's extender
>is somehow not compatible with OS/2, although I am not sure.
>
>Can anybody give me some suggestions about what I should try?
>I have been fiddling with a lot of the DOS SETTINGS switches,
>though to no avail.
>
>Thanks.
>     Mike
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Mike Cyze                          |    
>Department of Geophysics,          |   So much data, so little time...
>The University of Western Ontario  |     
>London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada   |  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>phone:    Dept. Office, (519) 661 3141
>Fax:                    (519) 661 3837
>Internet: mcyze@uwovax.uwo.ca OR mcyze@hydra.uwo.ca OR mcyze@uwo.ca
>          OR (last resort) a09@seis.gp.uwo.ca
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------

The problem is with the VDPMI.SYS file as shipped with GA. You need to get
the latest version of this file. You should be able to get this from
software.watson.ibm.com in the directory /pub/os2 and the file vdpmi.zip.

I had similar problems and also could not get zdb working the new vdpmi.sys
will cure your ills. 


MArtin Smith
msmith@netcom.com

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: harris@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Michael Harris)
Subject: Re: Can I get a sample of Font Dialog use?
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 01:37:36 GMT

grega@netcom.com (Greg Altman) writes:

>I am trying toi use the WinFondDlg function and I an getting crashes every
>time I get there. I don't know if my initialization of the FONTDLG structure
>is correct.

Be sure that you have initialized the pszFamilyName field.

{
char szFamilyName[FACESIZE];

memset(&FontStruct, '\0', sizeof(FontStruct));
FontStruct.pszFamilyName = szFamilyName;
FontStruct.usFamilyBufLen = FACESIZE;
... and so on ...
}

The font dialog updates this field in your structure every time a new
font is selected.
______________________________________________________________________________
     Michael Harris - harris@catt.ncsu.edu or harris@carvm3.vnet.ibm.com
 System Administrator, Computer & Technologies Theme Program, NC State Univ.
(My opinions are my own and do not represent those of NCSU or IBM Corporation)
From: KENKAHN@PKSMRVM.VNET.IBM.COM ("Kenneth A. Kahn")
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Writing Device Drivers
Date: 11 Sep 92 23:55:57 GMT

Organization: Staff of IBM Fellow - IBM Personal/370
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0
X-X-From: KENKAHN@PKSMRVM.VNET.IBM.COM (Ken Kahn)

In <msf.716240474@skaro> Michael Fulbright writes:
>I am working on a port of the SBBSD unix device driver for the Sound
>Blaster.  I have looked at several sample device drivers and I have
>almost all the info I need. I have 2 remaining questions:
>
>1) How do you parse the command line from CONFIG.SYS that invoked
>   your device driver?
>
>   Say CONFIG.SYS has    DEVICE=D:\A.SYS A B C D
>
>   How do I get the string 'A B C D'? Is it passed as part of the
>   initialization request packet?

The Request Packet for an INIT call contains a pointer to the invocation
arguments:

   +0   Header
   +13  (undefined)
   +14  DevHlp Entry Point
   +18  INIT Arguments
   +22  Drive Number (Block Device)

The INIT Argument string is everything after the DEVICE= statement.

Example:

   DEVICE=drive:\path\DD.SYS Parm1 Parm2=A
          !
          !
          INIT_Ptr

>
>2) The sample code I have is for pre-2.0 drivers. I understand from
>   'The Design of OS/2' that 2.0 drivers are still 16 bit, except for
>   the VDD part, which i'm not dealing with. Also, in 2.0 you do NOT
>   need to write bimodal code, since the DOS emulation is done in
>   protected mode. Do I have this right?
>

This is correct, though if you want this DD to run on a 1.x system, it doesn't
hurt to keep the Mode switching active.
From: feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: C++ Compiler for OS/2, which is NOT GNIU
Date: 7 Sep 92 23:14:20 GMT
Organization: DAFCO: OS/2 Software Support & Consulting

OK, I stand corrected. When will the IBM c++ compiler become
available?
-- 
Dave Feustel N9MYI <feustel@netcom.com>
 
RE Drug Warriors who enjoy making a "good" bust: I'm sure the Salem
Witch Hunters enjoyed their law enforcement achievements too.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: mjn@sbmiclr.cs.sunysb.edu (The Sixth Replicant)
Subject: C Set/2 CSD0014
Organization: Tyrell Corp.
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 20:16:53 GMT

Is there an internet host which has C Set/2 CSD's ?  I can't find them on
hobbes or watson.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Neuberger                                            mjn@sbcs.sunysb.edu

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: db3l@ans.net (David Bolen)
Subject: Re: Problem with WM_ACTIVATE.
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 21:29:01 GMT
	<1992Sep03.150929.24455@ans.net>
	<1992Sep4.233121.24295@njitgw.njit.edu>
Organization: Advanced Network & Services, Inc. - Elmsford, NY

In article <1992Sep4.233121.24295@njitgw.njit.edu> dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:

>OK. I normally debug code by single-stepping it through functions.
>This clobbers a PM program if you do it on the same machine, since
>single-stepping is the same as placing a breakpoint at every line.

You can still do it on a single machine with a PM program as long as you
don't switch back to the PM screen while single stepping through your
program's message procedure while it is processing a user input (mouse or
keyboard) event.

I did this all the time - including single stepping through my code.
Normally, to help improve performance I turned off screen swapping anyway, so
while I was single stepping through I was just in the debugger's text session,
but there's no problem in general.

The only hard requirements were/are that the debugger itself couldn't be PM
(until IPMD), and that you couldn't switch manually to PM (Ctrl-ESC) while
stopped in the middle of a message procedure for a user input message.

--
-- David
--
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------\
 \              David Bolen             \  Internet: db3l@ans.net      /
  |   Advanced Network & Services, Inc.   \   Phone: (914) 789-5327   |
 / 100 Clearbrook Road, Elmsford, NY 10523  \   Fax: (914) 789-5310    \
\-----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: bai@msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu (Dov Bai-MSI Visitor)
Subject: Re: Paranoia and OS/2 2.0
Organization: /usr/local/lib/news/organization
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 20:56:54 GMT

P.S. to my previous message: Are you running it on a 386 or 486 ? If
386, what coprocessor do you have ?

Thanks,
Dov


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: bai@msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu (Dov Bai-MSI Visitor)
Subject: Re: Paranoia and OS/2 2.0
Organization: /usr/local/lib/news/organization
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 20:52:17 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.043630.24988@news.Hawaii.Edu> tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen) writes:
>I FTPd the "paranoia" math testing program from research.att.com and gave
>it try on my OS/2 2.0 machine.  I have both Microsoft FORTRAN 5.1 and
>WATCOM F77/386 9.01b (that is, the B-level patches have been applied).
>
>First of all, neither the double nor single precision version crashes
>OS/2, regardless of which compiler was used.  I wonder why others have
>experienced crashes.
>
>Second, WATCOM passes with flying colors on the double precision test.
>On the single precision test, as well as both precisions with the Microsoft
>compiler, the program is unable to properly determine the radix, so the
>slew of defect messages that follow are presumably consequences of this.
>It looks to me like the program is fooled into thinking there are more
>significant digits than there really are, because of the wrong radix, so
>many of the defect messages seem to be triggered by inappropriate
>comparisons.
>
>Third, I didn't try either compiler with optimization disabled.

Did you split the file for the MS-FORTRAN compiler ? The .OBJ file
may be bigger than 1 segment. On the other hand, since you you left
optimization on the file is below 1 segment.

Dov

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: bai@msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu (Dov Bai-MSI Visitor)
Subject: Re: 1.3 and file handle limit?
Organization: /usr/local/lib/news/organization
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 20:38:23 GMT

In article <cDaVqB3w165w@sps.pgh.pa.us> kslater@sps.pgh.pa.us (Kevin J. Slater) writes:
>Is there a limit to the number of available file handles under OS/2 1.3? 
>I have a developer I'm working with who is getting an error message that 
>points to no more available file handles from an app he is developing 
>under v1.3. Any comments?
>

There is an API call 
          DosSetMaxFH( USHORT )
where USHORT ( an unsigned short number ) is the new file hadles limit for
a process.
 
>...Kevin
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>Kevin J. Slater (kslater@sps.pgh.pa.us)       | Believe in the Lord Jesus
>Slater Programming Services  | CI$ 73077,2427 | and you will be saved - you &
>Glenshaw, PA 15116-0027      | bix kslater    | your household. - Acts 16:31
>- - - - - - - - - - - - WESPAC BBS (412) 487-3637 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dov
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: clemens@faui8a.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Clemens Beckstein)
Subject: MOU sub system
Organization: Regionales Rechenzentrum Erlangen
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 16:05:56 GMT


Hello netters,

before I redo something someone more proficient in C than me already
has done:
  does anybody know or have source (!) code that translates the DOS mouse
  0x33 interrupt functions to OS/2 MOU subsystem calls?
I am interested in this because I am (trying to) port a mouse interface for
Lugarus Epsilon editor under DOS to OS/2.  The macro language of Epsilon
is almost C and allows for calls to OS/2 dynlinks...

Any help appreciated,

- Clemens
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: bauwens@acs.ucalgary.ca (Luc Bauwens)
Subject: Re: 2.0 fails miserably in the PARANOIA program ( was: Division by 0 crashes OS2/2.0 )
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 23:51:13 GMT
Organization: The University of Calgary, Alberta

In article <gyan.716247010@unixg.ubc.ca> gyan@unixg.ubc.ca (Gyan P. Sinha) writes:
>
>The spara program fails with Watcom 8.5 version of the Fortran compiler,
>running in a DOS box under OS/2. The double precision version passes 
>with 1 defect. Has anyone run these tests on Watcom 9.0 Fortran? Does
>this Single-precision, Double precision dichotomy still hold? 
 
Read my previous post about that.   (In a nutshell, with the
unpatched version of 9.0 that I own, there are problems, enough
so that I cannot complete the test, but not as many as with MS 
Fortran 5.1.  I have ordered the patch from Watcom and I'll
rerun the tests when I got them.  BTW, that's why I haven't
answered you e-mail either: because I don't feel I got the final
word yet.)

Luc B
From: young@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (young "Deerslayer" shin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Question about computer graphics for PC
Date: 8 Sep 92 01:32:18 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


Hi, I am posting this for a friend:

  Does anyone know of a good "Sprite Generator" for a PC, or are people using
various art/graphics programs to create bitmaps and manipulate those?
  I don't read the news groups, so can you please e-mail me the information?
Your help is greatly appreciated.

- Young
  young@eniac.seas.upenn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer