HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: eah@xenitec.on.ca (Ed Hew)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: sco's efs list
Date: 14 Dec 92 01:47:53 GMT
Organization: XeniTec Consulting, Kitchener, Ontario, CANADA

In article <Bz7Fn1.B1r@magna.com> doc@magna.com (Matthew J. D'Errico) writes:
>In article <9212122145.aa04159@compuli.compuli.UUCP> bld@compuli.UUCP (Bruce Dustman user account) writes:
>>Could anyone having a current listing of the efs's available from sco please 
>>mail me the list.
>
>Current listings are available on sosco...

Those unable to ftp, or unable or unwilling to use nuucp, should
note that we periodically post the full current SLS,EFS,TLS lists
to biz.sco.announce.
--
  Ed. A. Hew,    <edhew@xenitec.on.ca>    ....!uunet.ca!xenitec!eah
  XeniTec Consulting Services, Kitchener ON, Canada +1 519 570 9848
          [biz.sco.* newsgroups and mailing lists godfather]
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@convex.COM>
Subject: Re: Shell script poser
Originator: tchrist@pixel.convex.com
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 16:05:13 GMT
Reply-To: tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen)
Organization: Convex Computer Corporation, Colorado Springs, CO
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

From the keyboard of davidf@golem.waterloo.on.ca (David J. Fiander):
:; time perl -pe 's/(.*)/\u\L$1/;' /usr/dict/words > /dev/null
:
:real    0m06.96s
:user    0m06.11s
:sys     0m00.23s
:; wc -l /usr/dict/words
:  25144    /usr/dict/words
:
:SunOS 4.1 sed was a little faster than the rewritten one above,
:and both are about 3 times as fast as perl on the same
:hardware, but then thats 2 seconds vs 6 seconds.  Woopee.

The algorithm makes a big difference:

$ wc /usr/dict/words
  24495   24495  201290 /usr/dict/words

$ time perl -pe 's/(.*)/\u\L$1/' /usr/dict/words > /dev/null
       10.235868 real        9.578394 user        0.134004 sys 

$ time perl -ne 'print "\u\L$_"' /usr/dict/words > /dev/null
        4.554034 real        3.914425 user        0.167221 sys 

--tom
-- 
    Tom Christiansen      tchrist@convex.com      convex!tchrist

    A formal parsing algorithm should not always be used.
		    -- D. Gries
From: wolfman@jptcs.COM (wolfman)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: SCO Compability with OS/2?
Keywords: SCO ODT OS OS/2
Date: 20 Dec 92 03:27:58 GMT
Organization: JPT Computer Solutions
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

I currently own a 486DX-50 with 32 MB ram, and 2 200+ HD.  I have found 
out that the os/2 2.0 boot manager does not work with sco unix.  And that 
IBM is not planning to fix this small problem.  Does SCO, have a solution
for it?

Problem Detail:

212 MB IDE HD Partitioned as such:

    MB	  Name	      	    Activated
    1 	  Boot Manager	    Y
    60	  OS/2 2.0 (no csd) N
    136	  SCO UNIX    	    N
    15	  DOS 5.0 w/csd	    N

If you try to boot unix with the os/2 boot manager you get a boot error and 
have to reboot with another operating system, using fdisk make partition 3
(unix) activated, and then restart the computer.  And after that if you like
to get back to any of the other two operating systems, you have to use fdisk
to make partition 1 (boot manager) active again, and reboot.

Any suggestions, and/or idea will be much appreciated. And thank you in 
advance. 

Aram Mirzadeh


Xref: sparky biz.sco.general:4680 comp.unix.programmer:5711 comp.unix.sysv386:17440
From: wes@dd.dk (Mads Westermann)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general,comp.unix.programmer,comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: sigaction() and rescheduling interrupted system calls
Summary: Is it possible to have interrupted system calls reshceduled
Keywords: sigaction system call sco reschedule
Date: 16 Dec 92 10:08:27 GMT
Organization: Damgaard Data Distribution A/S

I'm running SCO ODT 2.0 (SCO Unix 3.2.4) and have run into the problem
of rescheduling an interrupted system call after a signal has occured.

In my AT&T Sys V.4 manual there's reference to a SA_RESTART flag on
the sigaction() function that causes interrupted system calls to be
transparently restarted.

In my Ultrix 4.2 manual there's reference to a SV_INTERRUPT flag that
does the same.

My SCO manual doesn't know of any such thing - It seems like the only
possibility is to manually check the return code and the errno from the
system call and manually restart the system-call if errno equals EINTR.

Has anybody solved the problem ? Is there a way to solve it ?

Any input on this subject would be greatly appreciated.


-- 
 Mads Westermann                | Phone:        +45 4582-3200
 Damgaard Data Distribution A/S | Fax:          +45 4582-3636/+45 4582-3737
 Bregneroedvej 133              | E-mail:       wes@dd.dk
 DK-3460 Birkeroed, Denmark     | UUCP:         ..!uunet!dd.dk!wes
From: ian@airs.com (Ian Lance Taylor)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: UUCP protocols (was: stray _pointers_)
Date: 18 Dec 92 05:21:36 GMT
Organization: Infinity Development, Waltham, MA

sl@wimsey.bc.ca (Stuart Lynne) writes:

>Well most of the new protocols seem to be in the Taylor UUCP. They have a
>very active mailing list. And the source code is only an ftp away. I'm sure
>that they would *love* to see commercial OS vendors adding the protocols.

I would like to see it.  I don't really expect it, but I'd like to be
surprised.  Of course, if they're Unix vendors, I think they might
just as well supply the Taylor UUCP code itself.  They have to make
the source code available, but so what?  Why does the fact that they
keep the source hidden make the HDB code preferable?  (Admittedly,
they've already paid for the HDB code).

>What they should do is publish an RFC after they get something stable.

I have been remiss in documenting the new 'i' and 'j' protocols,
although of course there is the commented source.  I plan to write the
formal description after the 1.04 release (soon! soon!).

>Taylor uucp apparantly (I havn't converted just read some of the blurbs) can 
>either drop in as a UUCP replacement *or* exist on it's own. I.e. you should 
>be able to run it on your system in addition to standard uucp.

This is correct.

>It also can use the same config files (Systems, Permissions etc) or newer,
>simpler, better (?? :-) ) ones.

Also correct.

>Finally if you do use it you must still specify that you want the new protocol
>to be used for a connection and if it's not available at the other end it 
>should be able to default back to g or whatever.

1.04 will use the 'i' protocol with other instances of itself by
default, and use the 'g' protocol with other UUCP's by default.  The
'e', 't', 'f' and a zmodem protocol 'a' are also selectable.

>I'll probably install it here as an option. I.e. in addition to the standard
>uucp. And only use if for sites that request it.

That's probably a wise strategy, but I expect that you'll find your
transfer times increase and your CPU usage decrease if you use it for
all your UUCP communications.  Of course, I'm biased.
-- 
Ian Lance Taylor                ian@airs.com                uunet!airs!ian
First person to identify this quote wins a free e-mail message:
``That is a fine analogy.  Its only fault is its unintelligibility.''
From: aehall@sumax.seattleu.edu (ein Bit bitte!)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: Archive SCSI tape problems with SCO/MPX running on Corallary.
Date: 11 Dec 92 04:58:08 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Seattle University

benu@cis.umassd.edu:
>	I'm running SCO/MPX (versions 3.2v4 and 2.0 respecitvly) on a Corallary
>multi-processor system and I'm having problems with my SCSI Archive tape drive.
>Most of the time it works fine but from time to time, the systems SCSI bus 
>seems to lock up and causes the system to crash.  I can make the system crash
>by doing:
>	tape -a 0 setblk /dev/rStp0
>Most of the time it crashes during cpio backup.  Has anyone with a
>similar machine noticed anything like this?  Anyone know what the
>problem might be?
>

As a matter of fact, yes.... I'm running a DEC 433MP with 4 CPUs...
The DEC DAT drive is on one of the Corollary boards and I get an error 
similar to this:

CPU2:	Error on /dev/whatever
	Can't access /dev/whatever...

(I'm afraid I don't quite remember all of it...)
Any way, I get this error when trying to tar or cpio to the tape, but when
I try again it works just fine...

Very weird.
I have a call into DEC support about it... we'll see what happens...

later,
Anthony

-- 
Anthony Hall                             _   _   Unix System Administrator
aehall@sumax.seattleu.edu               /_/ /_/ Physician Micro Systems, Inc.
                                       _   _   2033 6th Ave Suite 707
                                      /_/ /_/ Seattle, WA 98122  206-441-8490
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: Eduard Vopicka <Eduard.Vopicka@vse.cs>
Subject: setsockopt() question
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Reply-To: Eduard Vopicka <Eduard.Vopicka@vse.cs>
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 15:46:40 GMT
Precedence: bulk

Sorry for posting this trivial question:

setsockopt(..., SO_LINGER, ...) uses "struct linger" as it is defined
in <sys/socket.h>. "struct linger" contains "int l_linger /* linger time */".
OK, but what is the time unit for l_linger? Seconds? I failed to find this
info on getsockopt()/setsockopt() man page.

Thanks in advance,

Ed

-- 

============================================================================
= Eduard Vopicka                             e-mail: Eduard.Vopicka@vse.cs =
= Computing Centre                              fax: +42 2 235 85 09       =
= Prague School of Economics                                               =
= W. Churchill square 4                                                    =
= CS 130 67 Prague 3                      ("There is always one more bug") =
============================================================================
From: jpr@jpradley.jpr.com (Jean-Pierre Radley)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: chmod(C)
Date: 17 Dec 92 03:44:31 GMT
Reply-To: jpr@jpr.com
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 161
Precedence: bulk

Did I get a flaky ODT 2.0 tape, or are other folks' chmod(C) also truncated?
-- 
Jean-Pierre Radley   Unix in NYC   jpr@jpr.com   jpradley!jpr   CIS: 72160.1341
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: waller@hfglobe.intel.com (Shawn Waller)
Subject: Kermit for Unix 3.2.4
Organization: Intel Corporation
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:19:49 GMT

I am trying to locate a Kermit package for SCO Unix 3.2.4.  I am
not too familiar with the package, I am inquiring for a friend of 
mine.

Any help will be appreciated.  I have Internet Access so if there
is a site I can get this from or if someone can email it to me, that
would be great.

Please EMail responses.

Shawn Waller
-- 
==========================================================================
Shawn Waller		shawn_waller@hfglobe.intel.com

Who made it accross the street first, the chicken or the egg?
From: peter@DIALix.oz.au (Peter Wemm)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Help?? MMDF authorization example needed..
Date: 19 Dec 1992 15:00:36 +0800
Organization: DIALix Services, Perth, Western Australia
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.dialix.oz.au
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.4.19 #1

Hello..

I'm trying to set up MMDF Authorization on a public access unix
system.  We'd like to be able to control the mail going out on our
link to the world.  Any mail within our domain would be free, and
anybody should be able to recieve mail from anywhere.

From what I've read, the instructions are not all that clear and
only cover one particualar type of authorization - which is no good
to us.  We need to allow anybody on specified machines to pass mail,
or specified users on this machine or another particular machine to
pass mail.

Has anybody done this?

Thanks..
-- 
Peter Wemm   peter@DIALix.oz.au -or- peter@zeus.DIALix.oz.au
NIC handle: PW65    Current maintainer of the "NN" newsreader.
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit
From: mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu (Mike S.)
Subject: Problem with Curses windows : SCO 3.2.2
Organization: BITS, St. Louis, MO
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 17:29:47 GMT
Summary: Need advice with Curses window problem, SCO 3.2.2
Keywords: curses sco 3.2.2 window problem help


We are using the SCO 3.2.2 Development System, and are having a
problem with curses.  Basically, windows and panels which are over-
written by another window/panel do not recover their contents after
the top window is erased.

As an example, window A is filled with text, and window B is temporarily
placed over A.  After B is erased, A still shows the "shadow" of window
B, even after update_panels(), doupdate(), etc.


Hopefully it is something simple we are missing..

Thanks,
Mike
-- 
mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: PRN Development Lab <develop@aerie>
Subject: Re: Larry Michels Behavior Problems (Inside SCO)
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 15:37:36 GMT
Precedence: bulk

Let the busybodies and crybabies take their politically correct
hysteria elsewhere.

Trial by mob determining "de facto" guilt? Give us a break. Everybody
is guilty of something, even Microport. The revolution eventually
claimed Robespierre, too, if you remember.

-- 
 _ __   _ __   _ __
' )  ) ' )  ) ' )  )   PRN Development Lab
 /--'   /--'   /  /    mthvax!mamia!aerie!develop
/      /  \_  /  (_    9300 SW 87 Ave. Miami Florida 33176 USA


Newsgroups: biz.sco.general,comp.unix.xenix.sco
From: crouland@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (DES Cracker)
Subject: X-Windows Sources for 3.2.4
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 22:44:05 GMT


Does anyone know where I can find full blown X11 for SCO Unix 3.2.4
running on a 386? Binaries preferred.

Thanks,

Chris Rouland
crouland@gmuvax2.gmu.edu
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general,comp.unix.shell
From: nikki@trmphrst.demon.co.uk (Nikki Locke)
From: paul@openage.com (Paul A. Fischer, Sr UNIX Sys Consultant)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Disk Quotas for SCO???
Date: 15 Dec 92 21:32:05 GMT
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Precedence: bulk

Hi All,
 

Does anyone know of a way to implement disk quotas under SCO 3.2v2 ???

If so please let me know.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Independent SCO support and service provider in the D.C. metro area.
Insert clever saying here...
Paul A. Fischer           | Open Age Inc.  | paul@openage.com
Sr. UNIX Sys. Consultant  | (301) 948-6422 | (301) 948-9644 Fax
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: sl@wimsey.bc.ca (Stuart Lynne)
Subject: Re: b.s.m proposal - discussions released f
Organization: Wimsey Information Services
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 07:56:54 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.050156.23494@utoday.com> sean@utoday.com (Sean Fulton) writes:
>In article <Bz1M34.6ME@wimsey.bc.ca> sl@wimsey.bc.ca (Stuart Lynne) writes:
>>
>>Let's toss this around some more with this premise!

>and questions from readers about the things we all write. Second, this
>group would give us a presence on the net; it would give us a forum
>for discussion and generation of ideas that doesn't exist today.

>Mitch and I will both monitor a biz.sco.magazine closely and
>participate in net discussions in that group, much in the same way as
>sco participates in the biz.sco hierarchy today. In addition, our
>writing staff will also be regular readers and contributors to the
>group, giving it immediacy and accessability.

On this basis I personally would like to see this group created. I'm still
not too sure what's going to happen in there but it's the type of experiment
I like to see. In this case providing an on-line forum as an adjunct to a 
an industry trade paper. I woud *really* like to see the editorial staff
active in it with management support. It would be nice to see if they can
come up with some interesting uses for the group. For example I think it 
would be nice to see table of contents and/or article summaries/abstracts
posted here.

Byte has BIX and PC Magazine has PC MagNet. Maybe in 1993 SCO Magazine can
find intriguing ways to utilize biz.sco.magazine.

-- 
Stuart Lynne <sl@wimsey.com> ......................... UNIX Facsimile Software
Wimsey Information Technologies ................... moderator biz.sco.binaries
uucp login:nuucp passwd:nuucp .................... ftp.wimsey.com:~ftp/ls-lR.Z
PD Software for SCO UNIX .................... ftp.wimsey.com:~ftp/pub/wimseypd
From: dkazem@nas.edu (Don Kazem)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: Hiding machines in mmdf
Date: 17 Dec 92 15:57:59 GMT
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Encoding: 1350 Text
Precedence: bulk

>If you mean the UUCP From_ line, then there is no way to
>eliminate it, but don't worry, nobody looks at that line anyway
>(or at least they shouldn't).  If you mean the RFC 822 Received
>trace header, you can't get rid of that either, but I _know_
>that nobody looks at that.

>Don't worry, it is almost impossible to hide host names
>entirely.  For example, if the DOS box is generate RFC 822
>messages, complete with Message-Id headers, then the Message-Id
>has to have to DOS box's name in it in order to ensure
>uniqueness.

>- David

------------------------------------------------

I am only running smtp and not UUCP and the offending line is the Return-Path
line.
It actually comes out as:

Return-Path: dkazem@mailagent.nas.edu.

I received a fax from Sco support that says one can mask machines by using the
MLOCMACHINE in the mmdftailor file.  Specifically, the fax said to change the
following lines:

MLDOMAIN nas.edu
MLNAME     mserve              (this is the unix host)
; MLOCMACHINE

to

MLDOMAIN edu
MLNAME nas
MLOCMACHINE mserve

I tried this and rebuilt the database, but then when I manually ran the deliver
command
mmdf did not deliver any of the messages. When I undid their suggestion, it
worked again.
Any thoughts, comments, and/or suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

Don
From: lwall@netlabs.com (Larry Wall)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: Shell script poser
Date: 16 Dec 92 22:15:11 GMT
Organization: NetLabs, Inc.

In article <1992Dec15.220301.23809@golem.waterloo.on.ca> davidf@golem.waterloo.on.ca (David J. Fiander) writes:
: And here is the time for perl on the Sun4:
: 
: ; time perl -pe 's/(.*)/\u\L$1/;' /usr/dict/words > /dev/null
: 
: real    0m06.96s
: user    0m06.11s
: sys     0m00.23s
: ; wc -l /usr/dict/words
:   25144    /usr/dict/words
: 
: SunOS 4.1 sed was a little faster than the rewritten one above,
: and both are about 3 times as fast as perl on the same
: hardware, but then thats 2 seconds vs 6 seconds.  Woopee.

Well, if you get rid of the silly substitution, and say

    time perl -ne 'print "\u\L$_";' /usr/dict/words > /dev/null

it drops to about 2.9 seconds.  Perl 5.0 (early alpha, unoptimized)
does it in 2.1 seconds.

Larry Wall
lwall@netlabs.com
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: scottso@panix.com (Liquid Light)
Subject: Re: tar problems
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 20:07:07 GMT
Organization: Panix, (Home of the overflowing ashtray )


So I added a -o arg to tar here on panix (which we DON'T have on
our home machine....dumb Xenix!) and have all the files.  If there's
no easy fix for tar on the other machine I suppose I could dialup
from Echo and d\l all the files by hand since there's no Pkunzip
program over there (ARGHHHH!).

Why does all seemingly simple/easy/delicate work have to be done with
stoneage type tools?

-- 
    		   **************************************
  		   *This space intentionally left bland.*
      		   * Scottso (liquid light) Connor.     *
      		   **************************************
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: harris@scorch.apana.org.au (Michael Brown)
Subject: Re: Creating tar archive of large numbers of files...
Organization: Craggenmoore public Unix system , Newcastle , Oz
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 16:50:28 GMT

jpr@jpradley.jpr.com (Jean-Pierre Radley) writes:


|> I had this HUGE directory that i wanted to move its contents
|> to another directory. based on the discussion here I thought
|> using a find command would be my best bet. I tried
|> commands like this (with variations)
|> 

|Moving an entire directory hierarchy has been one of the examples in
|every man page for tar that I've ever seen:

|	cd old_dir ; tar cf - . | ( cd new_dir ; tar xvf - )


	Oh ,  but wouldn't ...
 
	   find old_dir -print | cpio -pdmv newdir   
	 
	 		... be a lot more fun.-- 
 .-------------------------------------------------------------------------.
 |             Michael  Brown  at Craggenmoore Public Access Unix          |
 |     harris@scorch.apana.org.au             Good Luck on your mission.   |
 |"Mother please, is it just a disease, that has them breaking all my laws.|
 |    Check if you can disconnect the effect and i'll go after the cause. "|
 `--------------------------------------------- Peter Gabriel -------------'
From: kbs@cse.ucsc.edu (KB Sriram)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Renting SCO Unix?
Date: 13 Dec 1992 03:40:48 GMT
Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz (CE/CIS Boards)
Distribution: ba
NNTP-Posting-Host: washo.ucsc.edu
Summary: Any places rent 486's running SCO Unix?

Are there places in the Bay area renting 486's running SCO Unix?

I would like to rent (if possible) one for a few days to port some
software onto this system, and I don't want to buy or lease the
operating system.

Any pointers? I'll summarize if there is enough interest.
Thanks!
-KB-
From: davidf@golem.waterloo.on.ca (David J. Fiander)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: Shell script poser
Date: 19 Dec 92 16:59:58 GMT

According to briank@ars2.uucp (D. Brian Kimmel):
>>> : You were lucky that you didn't pass it a file which had a line
>>> : beginning with one of the words 'match', 'substr', 'length', or
>>> : 'index', because then you would have got
>
>>> : >	expr: syntax error
>>> : >	expr: syntax error
>
>I saved the script to a file, test.sh, and executed it after editing
>out the non-script portion.  I did sh test.sh and also ksh test.ch.
>I get no expr errors in the execution.

I got the above behaviour on bot SCO XENIX 2.3.4 and ODT 1.2.
These keywords are not documented in either documentation.

- David
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: Will Hartung - Master Rallyeist <villy@uunet.uu.net>
Subject: UUPC vs Kermit
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 18:15:43 GMT
Precedence: bulk

We've got a client that has a PC connected to a Pick system. We need
to move data from the Pick system to an SCO box daily. The PC is
running a program called "Harmony" (something like that).

I'd love to get this process as automated as possible. What I'd like
to know is whether UUPC would be a better choice over Kermit for
transfering the file.

The logic is that UUPC would "try" a little harder to get the file
through to the UNIX system than Kermit. Has anyone done any automated
movement of files from the PC to SCO, with the PC originating the
transfer?

If I had my way, I'd have an Ethernet Card in the PC and just network
the silly things, but that's not an option. (This is the kind of
company that will use a modem to call the office next door rather than
wire them together...machines tend to move around a lot...)

Of course, if anyone knows of a more direct route from Pick to UNIX,
I'd be overjoyed. I don't have any hardware information on the Pick
system, but I'd love to hear options anyways (Heck, don't people write
comm protocols for Pick???)

Thanx!
Will
(uunet!la4gen!villy)

Newsgroups: biz.sco.general