HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: Responding to Bigots
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 92 11:03:31 GMT


In article <zvrjh4-.onr@netcom.com> onr@netcom.com (D.  Owen
Rowley) writes:

>Problems occur when un-seasoned motssers blast away,

Or even well-seasoned ones? :-)

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: max@athena.mit.edu (Max Meredith Vasilatos)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Auto-Fellatio (Re: Heterosexual Exploitation of Homosexuality?)
Date: 15 Apr 92 06:00:14 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Ailsa N.T. Murphy <IO81409@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes:
>i have heard some women can do this, although it isn't auto-
>fellatio anymore, of course.  i personally can't even imagine
>being that limber, tho...

Playboy did an excellent photo commemorative when the
last burlesque house in New York closed (1979?).  It
included three sisters who, all duded up in cancan 
dresses, "sang" into microphones with their vaginas, 
lying on the stage with their petticoats pulled up.

The picture that fascinated me was a contortionist who
curled up on an ebony pedestal that offset her perfect
skin, sinuous legs back past her shoulders and tongue
languorously in her labia.  Tres, tres elegant.

Max
max@athena.mit.edu
From: fjvwing@cs.vu.nl (FJ!!)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Czech this out (was Re: outing the stars)
Date: 15 Apr 92 14:36:20 GMT

ry@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (ryerson.schwark) writes:
:Ry Schwark
:(whose own name sounds like a seal barking or someone puking so he
:oughtn't talk)

'Ryerson Schwark'?

Just let someone outside the US accent domain pronounce it...your last name
sounds nice in the Queens English.

Your first name must sound wonderfull in that as well.

						FJ!!
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: tom@flood.com (Tom Chatt)
Subject: Re: D.C.con?
Organization: The Flood Group, Inc.  Torrance, Ca.
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 19:10:57 GMT

adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:
| Have you read the Portland proposal?  I'm desperately trying
| to figure out how to pack an ice axe in a suitcase stuffed to
| overflowing with chenille.  (Will I have to wear flats on these
| hikes?)

Don't sweat it, hon, Mark said we could rent 'em up there.
(C'mon Arne, do you really *have* an ice axe? I suspect your
biceps might be getting more exercise if you did... ;-)

As for shoes, hiking boots would be the practical thing, but
just wouldn't do at all with the chenille dress. Spikes heels,
on the other hand, might make an interesting statement worn
in the snow. And might even be useful on the glissade...

-- 
Tom Chatt                        \   Don't take offense, take action.
Internet: tom@flood.com           \    Speak up. When we remain silent,
UUCP: ...!uunet!flood!tom        / \     we oppress ourselves.
From: batman@batcave.Sun.COM (Karl MacRae - Burnin' with Optimism's Flames)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: These Boots Weren't Made For Walking
Date: 8 Apr 92 23:29:35 GMT
Organization: Tattooed Love Boys
NNTP-Posting-Host: batcave.ebay.sun.com

In article <j9sg98o@fido.asd.sgi.com> dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
>
>>politically correct, so I bought some.  I also started looking for some
>>cowboy boots. 
>
>cowboy boots are not what you need.  You need motorcycle boots or army
>boots... Really...

	It depends on what you want; cowboy boots for that 'Pretty yet
	studly' look, or motorcycle/combat/work boots for that full
	on butch look.

>> 1) Ugly 
>
>all cowboy boots are ugly.

	Oooh, what a SNOB you are! 

	Get down there and LICK these ugly boots, boy!

>>Well, practice makes perfect.  What do you folks out there have to say
>>about the proper way to walk in boots?
>
>
>Well, I recommend different boots.  Then, you can walk like me! 

	To truly walk like Jeff, you also need
	
	1) a guiche

	2) an attitude.

>Ah, boots... Why would one wear anything but?

	...Cause some people really do look good in spike heels....


		-K

  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Karl Elvis MacRae batman@batcave.Ebay.sun.com (408)922-4960 M/S MIL21-39
        Sun Microsystems, Milpitas, CA (The armpit of Silicon Valley)
               Steed: VT1100C    Cage: Who Cares?    DoD#1999
            -I don't speak for Sun, and they don't speak for Me-
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
		"Dude, I've got a Full-On robot chubby!"
					-Evil Robot Ted in 'Bill 'N Ted II'
  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: onr@netcom.com (D. Owen Rowley)
Subject: Re: Responding to Bigots
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 92 07:17:17 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <1992Apr08.174240.87725@watson.ibm.com> jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com (Jake Coughlin) writes:
>anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson):
>> The writer points out that he *does* think it's useful, and
>> cites the example of a friend who wrote him about how
>> reassured he was to see the bigots' arguments so decisively
>> trounced.

>i agree with this point which is why, when i'm in the right mood, i try
>to respond to bigots that i see -- not for the bigot's sake but for
>muffins' sakes.

All well and good, but both of you tend to be level headed and capable of structuring an argument.
Problems occur when un-seasoned motssers blast away, or use bad-logic
to answer the attack. 
I think that there are a muliplicity of factors that go into each case, and 
that each needs to be handled seperately.
I happen to favor the take it to e-mail approach for a few reasons, mostly 
because I find that these guys are honest in their beliefs about us and 
can be talked to in a rational manner. Some have become good e-pals strange 
as it seems??
I do confess to occasionally baiting them in public.
( I just did it to Arthur, but he's a special case :-)

The woulds be pschobabbler isn't worth the time of day in my opinion.
Flamers of that character really need to be ignored. Their rhetoric is
so far out that  they make fools of themselves when they rant like that.
I favor the approach to talk about them, but not talk to them.

>  homophobes usually can't deal with camp and wander away...

Or my favorite technique, I mail to 'em and start talking explicit sex.
I mean come on, speaking from the male side of the equation, mens sexuality is 
mens sexuality, we DO know what we're talking about.. don't we..
I do!
It shouldn't be surprizing that most of 'em are actually fascinated with the 
process :-)


LUX .. owen
-- 
D. Owen Rowley .. Note this acct is not my primary USENET access
mail gets to me quicker if you send it to owen@autodesk.com

*No matter where you go, there you are.*
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: RA040@Zeus.unomaha.edu (DECI 123)
Subject: Lip singing
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 02:51:48 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.11

I find the song "Don't Let the Sun Go Down On Me"

		By George Micheal with Elton John my favorite

	What do you all think?  Hey speaking of which, did you all here about
Milli Vanilli, while they were popular and on the Mtv tour?  They were out on
stage and the track got stuck for 5 to 10 min.  I guess they were out there
doing there jumping thing the whole time.  Could you imagine that?  GEE men
jumping around in TIGHT shorts on stage for ten min.  WHAT AN OPENING ACT!

	So whats the verditic on NKOB (New Kids On the Block) is that a DUMB
name or what?  NKOB, now thats just plane stupid.  Ohhh well, HATED IT!
								*snap*
								*snap*

	The yet unheard of......

	Semper 8^)
From: gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca (Gene Ward Smith)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Deletions
Date: 8 Apr 92 12:54:32 GMT
Organization: Centre Interuniversitaire en Calcul Mathematique Algebrique

In article <56925@cup.portal.com> Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton
Madison) writes:

>Perhaps, *IF* you know UNIX (GAG!).  Many people don't, and
>furthermore have an insufficient degree of masochism in their
>personalities to subject themselves to such a torture.

This thread probably belongs on alt.religion.computers, but
aren't you posting from a system which doesn't even support kill
files?

I've had to deal with a number of operating systems, and Unix is
by far the most powerful and versitle I know of. If you want a
system to really hate, try MS-DOS.				










--
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/CICMA/Concordia University 
                  gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca
From: mickw@autodesk.com (Mick Washbrook)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: movie review
Date: 9 Apr 92 22:57:03 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.235556.3700@intelhf.hf.intel.com>, pgryan@intelhf.hf.intel.com (Paul Ryan) writes:
> 
> I'm sick of the standard anorexic gay chic.  Edward was a big, muscular, 
> masculine guy.

He was? What version of the film did you see?
I thought Isabelle was considerably more butch than he was.

--
mickw@autodesk.com

"Nothing is true. Everything is permitted."
                              Hassan i Sabbah
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: manis@cs.ubc.ca (Vincent Manis)
Subject: Re: Heinlein & Who Are Vincent's Three?
Organization: Institute for Pure and Applied Eschatology
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 19:35:29 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.012422.24749@u.washington.edu>
rhiann@milton.u.washington.edu (Sandra Hereld) writes: 
>Where did the earlier posters get Arthur C. Clarke?  I've never
>heard that (and am facsinated!)  Tell me sources, please?

Well, I once bought a porn mag for the articles (I normally only look at
the pictures). The theme of the mag was Gay SF; they were, appropriately
enough, lite articles. One of the articles consisted of answers of 5 SF
writers to a questionnaire on homosexuality in the future; as I
recollect, they included Poul Anderson and Harlan Ellison, though at
this point I can't remember the other 2. Whereas all 4 of the other
writers answered the questionnaire point by point, Clarke's response was
his well-known postcard which he sends to all unsolicited mail. Instead
of checking off one of the boxes, he simply scrawled on it ``Who blew my
cover?'' 

--
\    Vincent Manis <manis@cs.ubc.ca>      "There is no law that vulgarity and
 \   Department of Computer Science      literary excellence cannot coexist."
 /\  University of British Columbia                        -- A. Trevor Hodge
/  \ Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1W5 (604) 228-2394
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Crusades (was Re: Deletions)
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 15:38:30 GMT


In article <57258@cup.portal.com> Furr@cup.portal.com
(George Dalton Madison) writes:

>Tim Pierce writes:

>>Do you have anything better to do with your time, George?

>I could turn the "haven't you got anything better to do"
>question around at you -- why are you wasting YOUR time
>razzing me over a couple *SHORT* jabs at Computing
>Obscenity, when they could be just as easily skipped as any
>other thread you aren't interested in?

One possibility, George, is that you do seem to be pretty
razzable on this Unix issue, practically to the point of
inviting people to take the bait.  Your point that they
don't *have* to take the bait, though, is a solid one.

A muffin wrote me last night about a complex setup he's
working on so he can do more than read soc.motss.  In
passing he asked me what editor I favored (none, I hate them
all equally!), and I responded by saying that few wars are
hotter than the holy wars over editors.  They may be even
hotter than the crusades over operating systems, over
GUIs vs. command-line interfaces, etc.  Like the tides,
these things just roll on.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?))
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: These Boots Weren't Made For Walking
Date: 16 Apr 92 03:59:00 GMT
Reply-To: pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <1992Apr9.082607.14630@reed.edu> nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:
>My favourite pair of shoes are *none at all*. I'm a barefoot boy. I
>usually carry around a pair of Chinese black slippers in my back
>pocket in case a restaurant gets officious, but I haven't found much
>of a problem with that in Oregon.

me too!  i remember all through school (i mean from kidergarten
'til i dropped out of college!) i would take my shoes off asap.  
got in trouble a lot, too.  i liked clogs then.  now i wear birks.  
same diff... come off easy.  

but restaurants here in downtown chicagow would notice.  they 
throw street people types out regularly.  but i kick'em off under
the table.  ;)  

>I love the little Chinese black slippers. They're cheap, portable, can
>pass as semi-formal wear, and are comfortable. 

yup.  got my kids hooked on 'em, too.  my daughter likes the ones
with embroidery on the toes, my sons like "karate shoes". 

>I broke down and bought a pair of hiking boots, though - grey Merrels.
>They're nice for wet and cold wear.

yeah, mine are *literally* indestructable.  had 'em 13 years now, 
look great.  sigh.  i *am* tired of them, though, and they are 
wearing out on the inside and (for the first time this winter) 
giving me blisters.  sigh.  

>Why do women own so many more shoes than men, on the average?

that's easy.  we have more fashion alternatives.  women have far
more/too many fashion options, and all require different shoes.  
so, all you men, who want all the fashion options women have, know
the downside:  necessary shoe opulance.  

peg
-who just bought a new pair of sandals today!  
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: Bryan J. Blumberg <b_blumberg@macsch.com>
Subject: Re: Jerry Brown on Donahue?
Organization: Systems Integration Branch
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.0
     <92094.193239QAA@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 20:39:05 GMT

>In article <Mdr8cLj0BwwuAoSmBm@transarc.com>, Bill_Chiles@TRANSARC.COM
says:
>>
>>I just caught a clip on ABC as I was entering a room with Jerry Brown
>>talking to Phil Donahue.  I heard him saying something like the
following:
>>
>>   I have had girlfriends.  I have always had girlfriends.  I could
>>   supply names and numbers, but they might be watching.
>
>Yup - the show was on this morning.  He responded to a comment that Phil
>made - something to the effect that since he was single, some people
might
>think he is gay.
>
>I felt his reaction to the question was quite level-headed and honest.
>I saw him on a former show not too long ago, and also saw the show with
>Clinton.  At first he didn't impress me, but the more I hear from him
>the more I like him.
>
>I don't know much of his GBL record, but from tidbits I've gathered, he
>seems positive to GBL issues.  (anyone have his actual record?)
>
>-Tim


     Once again, the Jerry Brown record in LGB rights:

     As Governor of California, in 1979, he signed an executive order
prohibiting discrimination in state employment based on sexual
orientation.

     He also said he would sign a bill that would prohibit it in private
employment as soon as the legislature would pass such a bill.  The
legislature did not pass such a bill until 1984.  By then George
Dukemejian
was governor, and he vetoed it.  In 1991, the legislature again passed
a similar bill and Pete Wilson vetoed it.

     Jerry Brown is very supportive of our issues.  He is also the
only candidate who wears a red ribbon to call attention to the fact
that the current legislature does not recognize that AIDS is a problem.

========================================
Bryan  J. Blumberg, The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation
815 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, California  90041-1777
(213) 259-4914, B_BLUMBERG@MACSCH.COM
From: gnn@mastodon.cs.berkeley.edu (George Neville-Neil)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Household names (wasRe: Heinlein and sexism )
Date: 10 Apr 1992 21:12:56 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: mastodon.cs.berkeley.edu

In article <jcn8tpg@fido.asd.sgi.com> pauli@sgi.com (Paul Isaacs) writes:
>In article <1992Apr5.170141.10725@husc3.harvard.edu> goldfarb@husc4.harvard.edu (Warren Goldfarb) writes:
>>In article <3245@daily-planet.concordia.ca> gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca (Gene Ward Smith) writes:
>>>
>>>Hmmm--what are some motss-related household words? 
>>
>>In the U.K. there is Fairy Liquid (dishwashing liquid) ; I was delighted
>>to discover here in the US a toilet-bowl cleanser called Swish.
>>
>
>There is a rip-off of Fantastic. It uses very similar packaging, and performs
>the same function.  But, it is called... "Fabulous!"
>

How about Homo milk ??

Later,
George


-- 
Why don't they just hire taller ballet dancers instead of making
them dance on their tip toes ??		M. Rochlin
From: markm@ogicse.ogi.edu (Mark Morrissey)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: D.C.con?
Date: 12 Apr 92 19:19:27 GMT
Article-I.D.: ogicse.36185
Organization: Oregon Graduate Institute (formerly OGC), Beaverton, OR

In article <1992Apr10.191057.28038@flood.com> tom@flood.com (Tom Chatt) writes:
>adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:
>| Have you read the Portland proposal?  I'm desperately trying
>| to figure out how to pack an ice axe in a suitcase stuffed to
>| overflowing with chenille.  (Will I have to wear flats on these
>| hikes?)
>
>Don't sweat it, hon, Mark said we could rent 'em up there.

Ignore him Arne, dear.  I'll even loan you my spare ice axe.

>As for shoes, hiking boots would be the practical thing,

Well, I don't know.  I told Tom that I might do the trip in my red high
top converse tennis shoes. However, you might want to shoot for something
with traction that doesn't clash.  Spikes with a vibram sole might be nice.

>             And might even be useful on the glissade...

Oh sure, now you're an expert on glissading?   ;-) ;-) ;-)

--mark
who knows a good inside joke when handed one.

Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: jns@wam.umd.edu (J. N. Shaumeyer)
Subject: Re: outing the stars
Organization: University of Maryland
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 23:44:42 GMT

Nelson Minar (nelson@reed.edu) wrote:
 
> I'm still waiting for SOMEONE to get offended at my .signature that
> reads "Homosexuals were invented for an episode of Barney Miller".
> That'll be a good one to explain.

Ok then, explain it, but it had *better* be good.  
Usually, I just spend my time being amused by it, 
but I guess I could pretend to be offended if it 
would help:

[quote from here]

Oh, and Minor [sic], where the hell do you get off saying

  "Homosexuals were invented for an episode of Barney Miller"?

That's so fucking offensive!  Just eat shit and die, scum!

--jns
From: francis@ircam.fr (Joseph Francis)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: These Boots Weren't Made For Walking
Date: 10 Apr 92 14:22:10 GMT
Organization: IRCAM, Paris (France)

In article <exotica.702844743@milton> exotica@milton.u.washington.edu (Tsilke Pearlman) writes:
>nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:
>
>>Why do women own so many more shoes than men, on the average?
>
>Becauase there are so many different *occasions*, my dear.
>
>Boots, I agree with Jeff, are the greatest, tho I have latley found
>great pair of Doc Marten *shoes* that I wear when I need a break.

Tsilke/Doc Marten: Not only could Tsilke wear my leather Biker pants
and look delicious; We also had a distinct ability to wear identical
looks the times we went out: DM boots/Shoes, Levis with right knee
torn, wide black leather belt, teeshirt, biker jacket, short hair, big
chest (though Tsilke outdoes me), healthy legs. I decided that most
women should start wearing black leather pants; no one will fuck
around with them ever... unless they are wearing them too.
-- 
| Le Jojo: Fresh 'n' Clean, speaking out to the way you want to live
| today; American - All American; doing, a bit so, and even more so.
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Tuesday, 14 Apr 1992 01:52:52 EDT
From: Ailsa N.T. Murphy <IO81409@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: ARTIMUS IS A JACKASS AND A COWARD
 <1992Apr11.150617.27188@macc.wisc.edu> <29E7BED1.23593@ics.uci.edu>

yuo, know, i think a list of persons who have so disgraced
themselves that no one ought to answer them anymore would
be a good thing to add to teh FAQ list.  i'm not even sure
i remember all of them at this point.  has djk gotten onto
the list yet?
                                -ailsa
From: Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: What Mara Missed!
Date: Thu,  9 Apr 92 20:02:56 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <1992Apr8.171225.7284@PacBell.COM> <1992Apr9.112419.28132@macc.wisc.edu>

Jess Anderson writes:
>rjwill6@PacBell.COM (Rod Williams) writes:
>>You mean Schwark schould schlep his Schwishy Schlong on the
>>back of a truck?  :-) --
>
>Rather, Ry risks ruining his reputation by revealing relaxed
>what really racy reprobates here relished reviewing rigid.

We've already *DONE* alliteration.  ;-)

 
() I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone,
() but they've always worked for me.
()      -- Hunter S. Thompson
-----
[George D. Madison, a/k/a Furr | 8-{)##] | NBCS:B8f+t+w-e+s+k+a!cv PIG 8/7]
[> furr@cup.portal.com <#> It's a BEAR thing -- you wouldn't understand. <]
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: onr@netcom.com (D. Owen Rowley)
Subject: Re: outing the stars
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 06:30:55 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <1992Apr09.163144.88570@watson.ibm.com> jakec@cyst.watson.ibm.com (Jake Coughlin,,,) writes:
>i have an aunt who is a lesbian in love with dolly parton -- next on
>oprah.  as a library researcher (or something like that), my aunt has
>done a lot of research on dolly and informs me without a shadow of
>doubt that dolly is a lesbian.  my aunt asserts that dolly and judy
>ogle are lovers.  we sat down and watched some dolly films, and lo and
>behold, judy is mentioned at the end of *every* film. apparently, dolly
>is married, but in her films, while pictures of judy grace dolly's
>desks and walls, the image of her husband is surprisingly lacking...

This may not mean anything, but  at one time I lived in Pigeon Forge
tennesee, Dollys home town. That part of the world is a strange and very 
insular place when it comes to the natives. There are five main familys in 
Pigeon Forge and Gatlinburg.. The Ogles . the whaleys, the Oakleys, the
Klines and the Partons.. In that order. Honestly the phone book has four pages 
of ogles and about ten entrys for folks named Smith. So Judy Ogle is more 
than likely an old friend from back home. You need to understand Hill people,
their culture  is strong, and friendships are very strong. 
Dolly is known for being exteremely generous with friends and family, 
I wouldn't think twice about her and this Judy Ogle just being best
of friends.

LUX .. owen

-- 
D. Owen Rowley .. Note this acct is not my primary USENET access
mail gets to me quicker if you send it to owen@autodesk.com

*No matter where you go, there you are.*
Newsgroups: soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: Human sexuality
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 11:08:37 GMT


In article <1992Apr7.094613.443@cs.uow.edu.au>
g8801935@cs.uow.edu.au (The Jester) writes:

>Hot damn, do they teach butt finding at school?  I think I
>missed that class.

Not the only thing you missed, numb nuts.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888