HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tyger@netcom.com (Kitty in the Middle)
Subject: Re: Breast Puns
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 22:52:50 GMT
Organization:  I didn't do it, nobody saw me do it, you can't prove anything!

In article <1992Jul22.162535.3177@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> cjp8b@dayhoff.med.Virginia.EDU (Chris Penington) writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.155954.430@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>>In article <MARTINC.92Jul22114137@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>>>In article <k-fmntp.aahz@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius) writes:
>>>
>>>Thank you for making a clean breast of it.
>>>Another thread of puns?  I bet we can return you tit for tat.
>>Ah, a thread like this is sure to bring back some great mammaries.
>Let's milk it for all it's worth!!!

Don't be a boob.

   Tyger

-- 
      Kristen Kohlbecker  And I would chose to be with you
      tyger@netcom.com    That's if the choice were mine to make   
                          But you can make decisions too
      A Tyger and a Lady  And you can have this heart to break
From: susher@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: pickup lines
Date: 24 Jul 92 16:04:14 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAXcluster

Well, here's sort of an anti-chatup line a friend of mine once did...

We were standing by a fire escape in the grounds of our school (we were both in
the sixth-form (aged 18yrs)) and my friend found an old screw. Looking up he
saw a girl (woman?) who he couldn't really stand but he thought that she liked
him (if you see what I mean).

Well, he walks up to this poor unsuspecting person and says (this the old screw
in the palm of his hand, behind his back..

	"Do you want a screw?"

At this the girl when bright pink, thought for a few seconds and replied..

	"OK then!"

At which point my friend promptly produced the old screw, poped it in her hand
and said..

	"There you are then."

and walked off, leaving the poor girl even more confused than she was already.

I don't condone his actions, but looking back at it, it was so surreal!

Steve
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org>
Subject: Re: Why are Women *SO* Vain ??
Organization: ZOOiD BBS
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 01:46:09 GMT

neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite) writes:
>Why are women just *SO* vain.
>
>Lip-stick, mascara: generally loads of make-up.
>Lots of hairspray and gallons of perfume.
>
>Most women don't need it, and IMHO many look an awful lot better

They do it just to bug you.  Just ingore them, they'll go away.

							Ross Ridge

-- 
Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU					     l/	 //
								    [OO][oo]
ross@zooid.guild.org						    /()\/()/
uunet.ca!zooid!ross						     db	 //
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart)
Subject: Re: seeking higher ground
Organization: my opinions only
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 21:46:14 GMT

In article <BruL60.Izp@news.cso.uiuc.edu> mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu
(Meloney Cregor) writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.190241.1603@walter.bellcore.com> nobody writes:
>>In article <1992Jul22.154022.20609@u.washington.edu> intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
>>>
>>>Angelwing - How do I get my testosterone level checked?
>>
>>Buy a ruler and don't shave.
>
>It's a function of leg hair length, right?  

Funny, my doctor told me that it causes hair loss.

Maybe I just have too much of it...no, I guess not.  Some things are
just more important than hair.

Seth		sethb@fid.morgan.com
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: browns@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Stuart Brown)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 20:32:30 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.110524.8580@cs.hw.ac.uk> neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite) writes:
>
>
>Given the opportunity if you came across a seriously gorgeously horny
>girl who was very repsonsive and willing to get to bed with you, but
>you knew she was only 14 years old.
>
>Would you ??
>
>a/	Without a second thought
>b/	Only if you knew you would not be caught
>c/	?
>

14 ?? No way.

I have serious ethical qualms about a certain 21 year old. But I'm sure I
would go for it if a) Nobody else would ever know about it
		   b) I didn't have to talk to her after
		   c) She would not remember that it ever happened

Then there is the cute 19 year old in the lab - but Perfesser>student
relations are so utterly verboten that I doubt if I could even get it up
if all of the above conditions were in force.

Why am I attracted to gorgeous air-heads?  I don't even respect myself for it.

-- 
Stuart M. Brown                               Postdocs rush in where wise men
U. of Manitoba, Dept. Plant Science, Canada       Fear to tread. 
browns@ccu.umanitoba.ca        
				Disclaimer?? Sure: "That Disc is Mine!"
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: Don't try this at home!!
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 01:39:05 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <13666@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:

>In article <thurlow.711780611@convex.convex.com> thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
>|If you value your current state of mind, do NOT get drunk and pull
>|out the classical music.  It gets you twisted.  Good twisted, but
>|maybe better twisted than you can handle.  Your cat will think
>|you're absolutely nuts (but then she's never trusted you anyway).
> 
>This is especially true if you set your cat down in a chair (for an audience)
>and then stand on the table and start conducting Dvorak's New World Symphony.

Hey!  I resemble that remark!  How the hell did you know?   :-)

Hmmph.  I was only trying to make Duchess a better soprano.

>Just curious.  What were you listening to.  I find that if I'm in that 
>state I'll listen to things I don't normally listen to.  You weren't perhaps
>playing the 1812 Overture were you?  Beethoven's 5th?  

Nothing so mundane, heavens!  :-)  I started off noodling on my keyboard,
and I figured out / stumbled upon the notes for the largo of Dvorak's 9th
and just _had_ to hear it.  Then I went to Copland's "Rodeo" (had to clear
the association with those goddamned beef commercials) and then to Albinoni's
Adagio, I think.  Oh yeah, somewhere in there I had a listen to Rodrigo's
Concierto De Aranjuez (what a great life!)  I didn't get to Carmen, and boy,
was _that_ ever lucky, or I'd have been toast.

>I once got drunk with my roommate and we put on Mahlers 1st Symphony.  We
>were playing "air triangle".  Check it out, the triangle player really gets
>going in the last movement.

I don't have that yet :-(  I _do_ have the 2nd (sigh!).  Therein lies
a tale.  After the Vancouver Symphony declared backruptcy a few years
back, the Bach Choir sponsored a concert featuruing Mahler's 2nd, and
hired the out-of-work symphony players for the performance.  I have
never heard an orchestra put more power into a work, and the fact that
they were performing the Resurrection symphony wasn't lost on a soul
in the hall.  It was like they were playing for their lives, and the
audience was right there with them.  It was astonishing music!

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Heaven knows / No frontiers
And I've seen heaven in your eyes			- Jimmy McCarthy
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: seeking higher ground
Date: 22 Jul 92 18:20:25 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Jul22.154022.20609@u.washington.edu> intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
|
|Angelwing - How do I get my testosterone level checked
|

That's a job for a professional.  

Having gone through the necessary training I'll be happy to perform that
test for you.

Now, if you would take off your clothes and get up on that table, I'll get out
my dipstick.

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll)
Subject: Re: topless
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 15:13:03 GMT

In article <1992Jul23.200932.7409@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>
>Personally, I think breasts are neat, both sexes.  I vote we keep
>them legal.

	Hmmm. Should be 'make both legal'. 

	As an aside, according to one of the police interviewed in connection
with the Gwen Jacobs event, women who have had their breasts removed do not
violated the law when they remove their shirts. I'm not sure I like the
implications of that...

							James Nicoll

	Mind you, I'm not quite sure what the implications *are*.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: markn@ssd.comm.mot.com (Mark Nowak)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: Motorola LMPS
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 16:50:24 GMT
Keywords: n

Before labelling having sex with a 14-year-old girl as sick, I think
that values have changes a lot over the years.  Wasn't Juliet 14
when she married Romeo?  Mayan women married at the age of 16.  Also,
ever wonder why teenage girls are often so attractive?  It's just 
evolution at work.  These girls are sexually mature.  They can have
children and Nature makes them attractive to would-be fathers.  The
problem with sex with a 14-year-old comes from society's dim view
of it.  I'd say society is pretty screwed up.
-- 
Mark Nowak                          | By means of the easy and the simple we
SWM, 25, 5'11", seeking SF ...      | grasp the laws of the whole world.  When
Chicago, Illinois                   | the laws of the whole world are grasped,
INTERNET: markn@ssd.comm.mot.com    | therein lies perfection. - I Ching
From: dreamer@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (David Caruso II ~~~)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 24 Jul 92 18:14:23 CDT
Organization: <><><><><><><><><><><>

Mark Nowak writes:
> I'm just pointing out the reason why teenage girls are attractive, and 
> the reason more men don't have sex with them is due to our society's
> values.  When there is mutual consent, I have trouble labeling something
> a crime.  Where is the victim? 

	I would disagree with this, but not because society does.  A
14-year-old person typically does not have the maturity to truly appreciate sex 
or the finer points of an intimiate relationship.  That comes later.  Any man 
who is older and subsequentally takes advantage of a young girl's naivety 
because of his sexual lust does not merit respect.
	I don't care how "attractive" a 14-year-old girl is ... she is 
basically a kid who should not be pressured into an adult role until she is
ready.  Any inducement to do so may confuse the issue for her, or make her
think negatively towards it when she does becomes an adult.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
David Caruso II			      "Great minds are the most misunderstood."
dreamer@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu						-- DAC2
From: evie@rodan.UU.NET (Evie Allen)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: guys with long hair
Date: 29 Jul 1992 10:32:46 -0400
Organization: UUNET Technologies Inc, Falls Church, VA
Distribution: soc
NNTP-Posting-Host: rodan.uu.net

In article <Bs5Lwz.yn@waterloo.hp.com> hudel@waterloo.hp.com (Chris Hudel) writes:
>cherokee@b11.b11.ingr.com (Lori Ludick) writes:
>: 	I have found that male friends that have long hair are more at
>: 	ease with themselves and with other people, they tend to be more
>: 	individualistic, while men with short hair are less open.
>: 	I have met several great guys with short hair, but they are still less 
>: 	likely to open up.
>:
>Oh, puhhhhlllease.  
>--
I don't understand why guys feel they have to grow their hair long...
I prefer guys with short hair..I find that really attractive!
I have a male friend who's hair is longer than mine and he gets
more attention from unsuspecting males....from behind he does.
You should see their faces when he turns around.
I would choose a guy with short hair any day over one with long hair...
Come to think of it, I wouldn't be interested at all with a male who
has hair longer than mine!

Evie
>                                                         Chris Hudel
>business: hudel@waterloo.hp.com                         519/883-3080
>pleasure: chudel@watarts.waterloo.edu             
>(Pleasure forwards to business...)       - all comments are mine, not HP's -
From: "dale smoak" <dale.smoak@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: seeking higher ground
Date: 28 Jul 92 23:16:56 EST
Reply-To: "dale smoak" <dale.smoak@channel1.com>
Distribution: soc
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

>In article <7LZgoB2w164w#depsych.Gwinnett.COM> dy@depsych.Gwinnett.COM
>(Dr. Yes) writes:

>What kind of "schools" do women go to?  Arts and crafts?  When you
>stop to think about it most classes that are _about_ something are
>attended mostly by males.
>

I missed the original post, but the above quote, highlighted though not
written by Marianna Max, is not true of adult-education, which in my
observation is usually attended by single people, mostly women.  I just
finished teaching a class on jazz, usually a male domain, to 12 women
and 2 men.

Dale Smoak
---
  DeLuxe 1.25 #12237  
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: walter (Walter Lego)
Subject: Re: Life After College
Followup-To: soc.singles
Reply-To: nobody
Organization: Twisted Pair Inc.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 12:03:12 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.185444.25277@reed.edu> terra@reed.edu (Clippers in '93!!!) writes:
>me to be shallow for a minute, I LIKE the guys I meet in bars.  They usually
>are in my same age range (I'm 23) they are making an effort to look presentable,
>which means I see them looking thier best and know what I"M getting into, and

Sorry to burst your bubble, but you really don't know what you are getting into
unless you have seen them at their worst which is exactly the problem
you have at the moment.

>they buy me drinks and dance with me, all things I think are GOOD.  I actually

Sure, you have a good time. That is nice, but one's ability to be a good mate
requires a little more than just being able to have a good time one evening, 
don't you think?

>spent all three hours at a bar with the guy I first danced with the other night,
>and he seemed alright, but still turned out to be a jerk on the phone.  Oh well,

Are you surprised that most "jerks" may know how to have a good time and
know how to make others feel good during the course of an evening? What does 
that tell you about a mate selection procedure based on having a good time 
"one evening"?

>which then sorta implies that nobody could possibly be interested in 
>drinking, playing pool, dancing, listening to contemporary music (in my case
>hip-hop and rap) and watching sports.  Can't think of a better place than
>a bar to meet the type of guys that would share my interests, can you? So 
>why is everyone so quick to knock bars as places to meet S.O.'s?  

It is not so much that those activities by themselves preclude any chances
of meeting potential mates as much as the fact that many of those 
activities usually take place in environments that don't really give you 
much of a chance to select/evaluate potential choices in some sort of a
reasonable way.

Assuming that you are looking for a mate that you can communicate and interact
with in many different forms, moods and places, having a pleasant (and possibly
superficial) interaction during the course of an evening is such a terribly
limited criterion for selection/rejection. Not to say that you will never meet 
anyone in a bar that you will be compatible with, but just that you are likely 
to meet a lot of people inside that you enjoy being with but may not seem so
great outside.

Any activity that brings you in contact with the same people several times 
over a period of time where you are not always trying to impress the other
person is likely to be more conducive (which *could* also happen in certain 
bars or social clubs). You could try regular community events, parties at 
friends' houses, volunteer activities, sports leagues, film clubs, outing 
clubs, etc. Many of these activities don't preclude drinking, music, dancing,
etc.
						Walter

What disclaimer?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: bu616@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Kevin J. Cordell)
Subject: Re: Why 14? How about 25-30?
Reply-To: bu616@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Kevin J. Cordell)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 23:59:04 GMT


In a previous article, tegarr01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu () says:

>My interest would be in a 30 year old.  I am tired of being with girls my age. 
>They are inexperienced dead beats.  Maybe it is my fault...NOT.  But the women
>that I come across just do not have what it takes to make an intimate session
>work.  I feel that a lady of 25-30 years would be experienced enough to help me
>experience complete satisfaction.
>
>Sure a 14 year could be sexy but, I doubt that she would be worth it.  I have
>been with 20 years old that couldn't keep me erect.(Just a phrase)  I don't
>see a 14 year doing any better.
>
>I like a sex partner who contributes to the moment.  A 14 year old, I think
>not.  If I wanted a dead "   "  I could find a 20 year old.  Why risk getting
>arrested?
>
>Teg
>
>"Explore the experienced and adventure you will find."
>

Why of course!  In my experience women are like a fine wine, better with
age.  I have more fun with women over 35, of course I'm 35 myself, but I
just can't relate to the youngsters.

kevin
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin J. Cordell
usr7495a@tso.uc.edu                  
ae545@yfn.ysu.edu
From: nyx.cs.du.edu!tlode@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 22 Jul 92 21:54:00 GMT
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In article <1992Jul22.110524.8580@cs.hw.ac.uk> neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil 
Postlethwaite) writes:
>
>Given the opportunity if you came across a seriously gorgeously horny
>girl who was very repsonsive and willing to get to bed with you, but
>you knew she was only 14 years old.
>
>Would you ??

Well, I never have before--I suppose it's just some sort of weird age
hang-up on my part.
From: watyew.uwaterloo.ca!jdnicoll@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: topless
Date: 22 Jul 92 18:58:00 GMT
Organization: University of Waterloo
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In article <MARTINC.92Jul21100656@grover.cs.unc.edu> 
martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>In article <1992Jul20.181750.4849@zooid.guild.org> ross@zooid.guild.org 
(Ross Ridge) writes:
>
>   Considering that it's apparently now legal for women to go topless in
>   New York State, 
>
>See.   We told you the US was better.

 Yeah, well, Nova Scotia has the best record in North America
for finding lost people, so there.

 Mind you, that's because NS is the 'Lost Person' capital of North
America. Tourists, locals, every type of person seems to go astray there.
The S&R folks blame the pretty scenery for distracting people.

 I don't believe it was  always legal for *males* to go topless, btw.
I dimly recall reading about mass-arrests occuring in the 1920s  when 
the current style of male topless swimming came into fashion...

       James Nicoll
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: seeking higher ground
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 18:03:13 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.154022.20609@u.washington.edu> intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.010055.4650@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>>In article <2152@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com> luzenko@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com (Bill Luzenko) writes:
>>>
>>>In soc.singles [....deleting gross generalities]
>>>
>>>So if someone out there is trying to avoid the current pitfall or
>>>name  dropping and the male beachmaster mentality/ female lack of
>>>a certain hormone lets talk!!
>>
>>[......] --now the biggest
>>problem is that "In soc.singles" and the final ellipsis are too far
>>apart.
>
>I don't know, Trygve.  I'm sure you're right, but I'm having trouble
>making sense of that last sentence - female lack of *which* hormone
>exactly?

I was wondering about that myself--last time I checked, women had 
estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, FSH, and all the other sorts
of hormones they're supposed to.  Maybe he got confused during Evita
and was worried about a lack of Evaperone?

>  Do you think he's looking for a female who scorns hunky guys who
>have a life, but still could be called an estrogen-crazed lust bunny? 
>Maybe I should just email him.  Ya think?

Hey, why not?  Though if you know anyone meeting the above description,
you really ought to get her to start posting here--I have a feeling
she'd be very popular.

>Angelwing - How do I get my testosterone level checked?

That's easy--you just drop on down to my office for a full examination;
I don't guarantee the accuracy of the results, but I always enjoy the
testing procedure.

Trygve   (Be sure to allow a full day.) 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: smith@comm.mot.com (Jeff Smith)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: Gagging Sloth Records
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 21:33:45 GMT
Keywords: n

In article <1992Jul24.154515.3091@news.acns.nwu.edu>, drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
			
|> Ya know the weird thing is that even if they think its wrong, I bet most
|> guys would at least be tempted by the allure of a pretty youngster (seems
|> to also be true for some male homosexuals and 14 year old boys). I
|> suspect that this "allure of youth" isn't something that attracts most
|> women. A 14 year old boy, no matter how pretty, would simply be of no 
|> sexual interest to me at all. So am I right ladies and gentlemen, is this 
|> really a gender difference? 

It's because men want sex more than women! Remember?  :-}

jds

***************************************************************************
                               * Health and knowledge and wealth and power,
Jeff Smith                     * Passion and poems and sex
smith@fl08-g.comm.mot.com      * I wear a smile like a leather glove,
                               * I won't shut my mouth for less.
                                                - shriekback
***************************************************************************
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org>
Subject: Re: Of Canadians and arithmetic skills
Organization: ZOOiD BBS
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 22:31:35 GMT

nobody writes:
>Don't mean to start that US-Canada thread again, but I found the rules
>for this sweepstakes entry to be very amusing:

>However, the magazine apparently wishes to dissuade too many Canadians from
>winning. So the following is in small print,

>...
>In order to win a prize, residents of Canada will be 
>required to correctly answer a time-limited arithmetical skill-test question.

Basically games of chance are illegal in Canada, but tests of skill aren't. 
Actually I'm suprised the rules didn't prohibit residents of Quebec from
entering the contest as Quebec has even stricter rules about contests like
this.  

								Ross Ridge
-- 
Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU					     l/	 //
								    [OO][oo]
ross@zooid.guild.org						    /()\/()/
uunet.ca!zooid!ross						     db	 //