HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: steve@presto.ig.com (Steve Barnhouse)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: He *thinks* he has his DOD number...
Keywords: get a clue
Date: 5 Sep 92 00:01:05 GMT
Organization: IntelliGenetics, Inc., Mountain View, California USA

In article <9lzefr9@Unify.Com> tracy@Unify.Com (Tracy Jeannine Wiseman) writes:
>In article <viking.715218350@vincent1.iastate.edu> viking@iastate.edu (Dan Sorenson) writes:
>>	Rightous enough to give you a DoD number on a Saturday, and a number
>>that the archive shows as belonging to Tracy Wiseman (tracy@fiji.unify.com)?
>>Somehow I doubt it.  Lazlo, you update the archives -- give us the scoop.
>
>>>In <1992Aug30.221657.20962@news.nd.edu> 
>>>Richard.A.Swift.1@nd.edu (Richard A. Swift) writes:
>>>
>>>I proudly proclaim myself Denizen of Doom number 555. Long Live the DOD!!!
>
>	NFW.  I'm DoD #555, and I resent you trying to preempt my number, or
>share it, or whatever you're doing.  Get a clue, man.  And definitely get 
>another number.

Hey don't worry guy, whoever you are.  You can have my number.  I'll
be happy to share it with you and anyone else who's interested enough
to post a lot of gibberish that has nothing to do with motorcycles.

Peace and happiness and shared numbers!
----
Steve Barnhouse                                   steve@presto.ig.com
1964 BMW R-27  **  1965 Harley XLCH  **  1967 BMW R-75/conversion  ** 
1989 BMW R-100GS
----
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: colombo@bronco.fnal.gov
Subject: Re: Centripetal !!
Organization: Fermilab Computing Division
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 21:30:33 GMT

In article <21036.89.uupcb@chaos.lrk.ar.us>, dave.williams@chaos.lrk.ar.us (Dave Williams)  writes:
> 
> -> when trying to convince some folks that there ISN'T any such thing as
> -> 'Centrifugal' force. 'Centrifugal' is only a word used to label that
> -> feeling of being 'thrown' outward such as in a vehicle whose course
> -> has changed direction. How or where the word came into use is beyond
> -> me. The correct term to use when describing 'that outward feeling' is
> -> 'Centripetal' which is the name for the force that is actually acting
> 
> 
>  Your professor will undoubtedly be shocked to find out that some
> elementary-school science books and high school physics books use
> "centrifugal" instead of "centripetal."  In fact, the books *I* had for
> high school physics were that way.
>                                                                     

Sir Isaac Newton coined the terms centrifugal and centripetal forces.

Centrifugal force it the outward force.  Centripetal force is the inward force.
Let's say a cage  taking a corner at high speed, centrifugal force pushes
you (say) into the door and the door provides the centripetal force needed
to keep you inside, assuming the door doesn't fly open. :-)

-- 
 ___________________________________________________________________________
 *****  *   *  From the e-net desk of: Rick Colombo CD/DCD/DSG    *    *
 *      **  *  Fermi Nat'l Acc'l Lab   708-840-8225 Fermilab     * *   *
 ***    * * *  P.O. Box 500   MS 369   Feynman Computer Center  *****  *
 *      *  **  Batavia, Ill. USA 60510 Colombo@fnal.fnal.gov    *   *  *****
 *  Sure to get `Flamed' if I didn't cross all my i's and dot all my t's ;-)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: rroberts@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Ross Allan Roberts)
Subject: Re: Request for Info - Passenger Position (was: Re: beginner's luck)
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 15:56:23 GMT

> Is(are) there any law(s) which PROHIBIT motorcycle passengers from
> facing any direction other than FORWARD?
> 
> 2) Is sitting facing the rear legal in the USofA?

god, I hope not. Think of the fun we'll all miss out on.

 #############################################################################
#Ross Roberts (rroberts@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)|'85 IT200, '81 MX100       #
#DoD#0340, still patiently awaiting the 6ooF2...  |'88 YFM350 Warrior         #
 #---------------------4-stroke good, 2-stroke gooder!---------------------- #
 #       Today's Lyric:'I don't believe in love... it's never worth          #
 #                   the pain that you feel' -- Queensryche                  #
 #############################################################################
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: key fobs
Date: 8 Sep 92 17:44:37 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <txd.715636594@Able.MKT.3Com.Com> txd@ESD.3Com.COM (Tom Dietrich) writes:
>Go for it! I'll take two, Beth'll probably want one or two also...
>

 Fob me.
 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
From: ssuhouns@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk (Paul Marshall Hounslow)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: Interesting Chain note
Date: 7 Sep 92 16:55:26 GMT
Reply-To: ssuhouns@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk
Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., University of Reading

In article 18035@pica.army.mil, tcora@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Tom Coradeschi <tcora>) writes:
>klinger@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Jorg Klinger) writes:
>>
>>  In Sept. Cycle Canada a Tuner servicing northern tracks with his
>>inertia Dyno notes that 1 of every 10 bikes he tested looses up to 7%
>>rear wheel horsepower due to seized links or loose chains. So maybe
>>shafts are more efficient after all.
>
>Interesting.

I read someware, can't remember just now, that one of the old British manufactures
(Velocette I think) used to race with shaft drive bikes, cos they said that while
chains were more efficient at the start of the race, by the end the shaft was much
better.  Mind you there has been a lot of improvement in chain tech. since then ;-)

>
>>  However from same Mag.
>>
>>  BMW's have excellent suspension for the first 8,000km , then they load
>>them of the boat.
>
>Wanna try that one again? Like: What do you mean to say?
>-- 
> 

Did 75,000 miles on my last BMW, only needed to change the rear shock once, after
a long trip around France me at 13st YL at 11st *LARGE* tent and lots of luggage.


PS, I have heard a rumor going round, that with the resergence(sp??) of British
motorcycle manufacture, that Spagthorpe are being resurrected.  They hope to
introduce two new motorcycles, a lightweight (in the old Spagthorpe tradition ;-)
sports 900 called the Pit-Bull, and the Rotweiler, a touring job.  Havn't much
more info, can anyone else shed some light on this matter?



Paul

----
73's de Paul                         The smelling pistakes are all my own.
Packet: G4YFY@GB7BEQ                 I have no employer (I retired ;-).
EMail:  ssuhouns@susssys1.rdg.ac.uk  1990 16 valve K100RS(LT)    DoD #0573
From: bradl@tekig5.pen.tek.com (Katya Laynoff)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: SHORT TRIPS AND ENGINE DEATH
Date: 11 Sep 92 03:59:16 GMT
Reply-To: bradl@tekig5.pen.tek.com
Distribution: na
Organization: Pokey Folk on Parade

>In article <18ntppINNmvn@rodan.UU.NET> smm@rodan.UU.NET (Steve Mansfield) writes:

  [about preventing moto-failure due to excessive short trips]
>
>>An even simpler method of preventing this is riding a bicycle or walking

  I live ~ 1 mile from where I work, so I walk to work frequently. I
  think walking is more dangerous than riding a moto. Cagers are equally
  braindead with respect to pedestrians, and talk about vulnerability! I
  nearly had to lay it down just the other day. Fortunately I was
  carrying leathers.

  On the other hand, I think pedestrians travelling at the nominal PeD
  speed can outbrake both cagers AND sportbikes. But I never race...I'm
  afraid of getting an "exhibition of speed" citation.

  I'm squarely against pedestrian helmet laws, I think you should know
  that.

  Buy fur now.

  p.s. :-) and apologies to Tod Johnson (;;;;;;;;;;;;)<---unused ;'s 



--
Bradlee T. LaBroad                             read & write & ride & juggle
 bradl@tekig5.pen.tek.com                        It's a tough job but 
   GB_500 DoD#389                                somebody gets to do it.
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: declrckd@rtsg.mot.com (Dan J. Declerck)
Subject: Re: Fabulous Harley Babe Bashing etc.
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 22:17:35 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.043257.2807@athena.mit.edu> boo@athena.mit.edu (Christopher J Foley) writes:
>
>>If HD would build a modern bike (a la buell) with a modern engine, I'd buy it
>>and I'd buy it NOW!. but they don't, so the point is moot.
>
>
>Buell is looking at John Britten's really impressive v twin racing engine. If
>they comercialize it, it'll be a step towards a competitive Buell.  Of course,
>Britten is Australian, but hey... 

One of the ME's that runs the production lines at Buell used to work here
at Motorola. We went to Mukwanago Wis and toured the plant. We got to ask all kinds
of questions. 

I asked why they chose HD Sportster engines. I was told the cost to certify
an engine with the EPA was prohibitive (Buell only makes about 250 bikes a year)
So they chose HD. I believe they have more North American content than Harley,
since the Forks are made by White Bros, whereas HD uses Showa.
The Frames are all Chrome Moly. I got to sit on one. While it felt heavier
than my EX500, it had a pretty good balance. It did not feel like a Ducati though.

>
>Do you know if the Buells that are out now are really heavy?
>I suspect that they are, because in the ads, they give lots of specs, but they
> don't give the curb weight.

My sales brochure lists 450 lbs. dry weight.

-Dan

-- 
=> Dan DeClerck                      |  EMAIL: dand%isdgsm@rtsg.mot.com   <=
=> Motorola Intl Subscriber Group    |                                    <=
=>                                   |  Phone: (708) 632-4486             <=
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: pfs@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu (Paul Schnettler)
Subject: Re: key fobs
Organization: Physical Sciences Lab, University of Wisconsin
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 15:18:13 GMT

In article <1992Sep6.223021.23818@morgan.ucs.mun.ca> hamm@weejordy.physics.mun.ca (Craig Hamm) writes:
>	Gimmie key fob too.
>
>	(ok, I'll pay)
>-- 
I'll second that!
Me want cookie, me want key fob!
From: bloom@inland.com
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: more bike vandalism
Date: 14 Sep 92 15:43:15 CST
Organization: Inland Steel Company; East Chicago, IN

In article <7956@public.BTR.COM>, jamesf@btr.btr.com (James G. Franklin  jamesf@btr.com) writes:
> I saw a bike today with riders two up. As I got closer I noticed some scum-
> sucking vandal had put a BUSH-QUAYLE '92 sticker on the back of the seat. I 
> thought about pulling them over and letting then know, but I don't do well
> around distraught people. Sigh. Will this senseless defacing never cease?


If you would have checked, you would have seen it actually was Bush and 
Quayle on that cycle.  They were just practicing for when they get 
ridden out of town on a rail.  
...................Dr. Doom

P.S.  Conservatives need not reply.
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: X-reg in the UK?
From: emd@ham.almanac.bc.ca
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 92 16:10:23 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Robert Smits

ant@galadriel.bt.co.uk (Antony Espindola) writes:

> From article <1992Sep4.191922.7758@javelin.sim.es.com>, by blgardne@javelin.s
> > ant@galadriel.bt.co.uk (Antony Espindola) writes:
> > 
> >>	The letters unused are : Q (reserved
> >>	for cars of unknown origin or parts from more than one year - used
> >>	for kits cars/bikes and rebuilds etc.)
> > 
> > Would that be where the term "Q-ship" came from? That is, a bike (or
> > whatever) that looks stock, but goes like a bat out of hell.
> > -- 
> > Blaine Gardner @ Evans & Sutherland  blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com  BIX:blain
> > 580 Arapeen Drive, SLC, Utah 84108           Favorite road signs:
> 
> This would apply only if the owner cannot prove the origin of all the
> parts - eg. if most parts come from 1986, the bike would be registered
> as 1986 but if the parts came from different years eg.frame '91,
> engine '72 [sick!] wheels 1823 (this is only an example) then it would
> have to be a Q. BUT - it depends on how lawfull the owner is !!
> In Performance bikes, someone put two RD350 LC engine together (yes,
> together) and made a RD750LC (he couldn't count) but that did not have
> a Q-Plate.
> 
> As for Q Ships....? Never heard of 'em.
> 
> 
> Antony
> (No, I haven't got a DoD number)


Well, originally, a Q-ship was an ordinary looking merchant vessel - a 
freighter or something, with guns concealed by false decks, covers, etc. 
When they happened upon another vessel, they would get as close as 
possible, uncover their guns and sink 'em. The Germans had at least one 
Q-ship in WWI that managed to stay out for a couple of years.

In motorcycle parlance, then, a Q-ship is a stock looking motorcycle that 
has the ability to blow your doors (or boots, ATCMB)off.

Robert Smits Ladysmith BC  | I don't wanna pickle,
emd@ham.almanac.bc.ca      | just wanna ride my motorsickle - AG
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: spindler@emr1.emr.ca (Chris Spindler)
Subject: Suzuki Electrics - again !
Summary: Alternative to the OEM stator ?
Keywords: Suzuki, stator
Organization: Energy, Mines, and Resources, Ottawa
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 18:53:37 GMT

This has come up before but my memory fails me.

The stator on my girlfriend's 83 Suzuki GS 400 has finally
failed completely.  An OEM replacement is at least $150 (=:-O)
and there is no guarantee that the new one will be any sturdier
than the dead one.

We've been quoted $500 for replacement (labour, parts, etc.)  The
bike only cost $650!

Does anyone have any suggestions for a cheaper, more reliable
replacement?  We'll do the work ourselves (with the help of
her stepfather who is a MC mechanic).

-- 
                Chris Spindler - Seismologist @ Large       
   '91 550 Zephyr    - - - - - - - -  o    Never ascribe to malice       
   '91 K75RT       - - - - - - - -  _/\_>    what is easily explained    
    DoD #6371    - - - - - - - -   O,> / O     by stupidity.
From: bob@halfdome.sf.ca.us (bob pasker)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: test post
Date: 9 Sep 92 18:55:01 PDT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Disorganized Organization

In article <1992Sep9.132938.13477@pica.army.mil>, tcora@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Tom Coradeschi <tcora>) writes:
> bob@halfdome.sf.ca.us (bob pasker) writes:
>>of course, my favorite question to ask libertarians is, "so, you wouldn't
>>mind if i moved in next door and built a thermonuclear [hi boys from NSA!]
> DOE? DNA?
> NSA = National Security Agency = Spies, not nukies.

don't  tell the rosenbergs & greenglass.

-- 
-- bob pasker
-- bob@halfdome.sf.ca.us 
--
From: smm@rodan.UU.NET (Steve Mansfield)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: key fobs
Date: 8 Sep 1992 14:29:04 -0400
Organization: UUNET Technologies Inc, Falls Church, VA
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: rodan.uu.net

In article <1992Sep8.174437.2098@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <txd.715636594@Able.MKT.3Com.Com> txd@ESD.3Com.COM (Tom Dietrich) writes:
>>Go for it! I'll take two, Beth'll probably want one or two also...
>>
>
> Fob me.

This is beginning to sound kinky, in which case - fob me too!
(hmmm.....)
Seriously, though, I would like one.

Steve Mansfield	    | The system we've learned says we're equal under law
smm@uunet.uu.neta   | But the streets are reality, the weak and poor will fall
1983 Suzuki GS550E  | Let's tip the power balance and tear down the crown
DoD# 1718	    | Educate the masses, we'll burn the White House down.
Queensryche	    -       Speak the Word.
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com (Dances With Bikers)
Subject: Re: glasses and helmets
Reply-To: blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 23:33:09 GMT

sai@formula1.Corp.Sun.COM (S.Fielding-Isaacs [WWFO Pubs Project Lead]) writes:
>In article <pmvntao@fido.asd.sgi.com> cj@sgi.com (C J Silverio) writes:

>>The FAQ mentions cutting chunks out of the foam liner to
>>allow room for glasses.  Is this really a good idea?

> I think it's a _really_ stupid idea, 

Are we talking about the protective styrofoam, or the soft "comfort" foam?
I'd agree that messing with the styrofoam is a bad idea, but I don't see
any problem with trimming a bit of the soft stuff.

Different helmets can make quite a difference. I don't have the slightest
problem with my Arai Signet, but at least one earpiece always fouls on
my Shoei VF-X and I have to fiddle with it for a bit to get my glasses into
place.
-- 
Blaine Gardner @ Evans & Sutherland  blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com  BIX:blaine_g
580 Arapeen Drive, SLC, Utah 84108           Favorite road signs:
Dumper of Dirtbikes #46             FJ1200   Winding Road Next 77 Miles
My other motorcycle is a Quadracer           Caution: Passing Areas Not Marked
From: klinger@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Jorg Klinger)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: equal opportunity cheesecake
Date: 11 Sep 92 17:15:36 GMT
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

In <18qa4nINN58k@sixgun.East.Sun.COM> egreen@east.sun.com (Ed Green - Pixel Cruncher) writes:

>In article 29978@serval.net.wsu.edu, bill@wsuaix.csc.wsu.edu (William E. Johns;S23015) writes:
>>In article <18mdcjINN2ma@cs.utexas.edu> osborn@cs.utexas.edu (John Howard Osborn) writes:
>>>
>>>Do hets *really* find the heels-bikini combo sexy?  Even when holding
>>>a pipe wrench?
>>
>>I can only presume that such tactics continue because most people think
>>it works.  To think otherwise is to question ones "manliness".  

>It works because what the grease monkeys really want to hang on the
>wall, their boss won't let 'em.  :^)   XYZ Corp. doesn't care about
>offending anyone, because damned few people are going to *not* buy a
>XYZ motorcycle because of a babe calendar.  The purpose of the ad is
>not to convince you to ride a XYZ bike, it is simply to get your
>attention.  Once your attention is gotten, the XYZ emblem is burning
>itself into your brain.

>A *lot* of advertising has nothing to do with persuading you to buy a
>product, it is successful if it simply gets the product name/logo/diddy
>into your consciousness for a moment.

  I agree.

  We have some Bathing Suit calendars floating around here, picked up
from the trades, with a plumbing supplies distributers name on it. I
don't have a clue about plumbing but I know the name of one supplier off
hand. Guess it works.
                        Jorg
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: hamm@weejordy.physics.mun.ca (Craig Hamm)
Subject: Re: key fobs
Organization: Ocean Sciences Centre
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 22:30:21 GMT

	Gimmie key fob too.

	(ok, I'll pay)
-- 
  
    Craig Hamm, Memorial University, | I don't think the letters which appear
    Newfoundland                     | on your letters page are genuine. I 
    DoD #1500,                       | think you just make them all up.  In
    81 Maxim 650                     | fact you probably made this one up
    ------------                     | too.  -J. Clark, Rotherham (Viz comics)
From: jlp@blink.att.com (Jon Peticolas(x7058))
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: HERE I AM! LOOK AT ME! I'M MAKING A BIG NOISE! I'M SPECIAL!
Keywords: flamebait flamebait flamebait
Date: 8 Sep 92 15:51:00 GMT
Organization: AT&T

Not that I'm any fan of loud pipes or anything but....

cam@castle.ed.ac.uk (Chris Malcolm) writes:
>Open pipes, or the noisier kind of sport "silencers", produce enough
>noise to completely destroy the hearing of their owners in less than
>ten years of riding. Hearing damage can be measured after one hour's
>ride. 

Care to let us in on where you got these numbers? Is that ten years
of riding with your ear pressed up to the pipe or what? 

Just one data point. The guy next door to me has a Harley with straight
pipes. It's loud. Lucky for me, my kids aren't scared of loud bikes and
can sleep right through this guy pulling up at 12PM. It can be anoying
though, particularly at dinner time when my son just has to jump up and
watch him ride off. So anyway, he let me take it for a ride one day and
the funny thing is that when you're on the bike the pipes don't seem very
loud at all (at least while you're moving). The wind noise (I wear a CHP
style helmet) is much louder. I personally don't buy the "loud pipes save 
lives" crap, but I think that loud pipes are more likely to damage your 
neighbor's hearing than your own. If you're concerned about hearing loss,
use ear plugs. I won't ride the bike a mile without mine.
   _____            
  (__ __)___   __  _
 _  ( ) /   \ (  \( )
( )_( )(  O  )( \ \ )
 \___/  \___/ (_)\__)
From: ranck@vtserf.cc.vt.edu (Wm. L. Ranck)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
Subject: Re: vanity plates
Date: 14 Sep 92 21:51:06 GMT
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

: efw5565@zeus.tamu.edu (Evelyn - gorgeous red-headed biker babe...) writes:
: >Anybody out there have personalized plates?

   I posted a while back about transferring the vanity plate designation from
a van to a motorcycle.  My Virago has RANCK on the plate.  I like to go for
the obvious.
--

*******************************************************************************
* Bill Ranck     DoD #496  ranck@joesbar.cc.vt.edu                            *
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: behanna@phoenix.syl.nj.nec.com (Chris BeHanna)
Subject: Re: equal opportunity cheesecake
Organization: NEC Systems Laboratory, Inc.
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 16:25:06 GMT

In article <25778@castle.ed.ac.uk> cam@castle.ed.ac.uk (Chris Malcolm) writes:
>
>>  I have a couple of Photography books, and In the sections entitled
>>"Photographing Women", they often suggest that a model wear heels when
>>posing in a standing position.  They say that it causes certain muscles
>>in the legs to tighten up, thus having the effect of making the model's
>>legs appear more shapely....
>
>They all say this, and when you ask "which muscles where" they get
>confused.

	The soleus and gastrocnemeus muscle groups in the calf are the
muscles so affected.

>High heels on women have the effects of:
>
>	making her teeter slightly, emphasizing that dressed like this
>	she is essentially impractical and for decorative purposes only;

	IN YOUR (HUMBLE) OPINION.  I happen to think heels can flatter the shape
of a woman's leg.  They are, however, impractical, and I'd never ask my
girlfriend to wear them.

>	making it hard for her to run away;

	Although this is true, this is not part of the appeal (at least, not
to me).

>	making it easier to push her over;

	Again, this is true, but not part of the appeal (at least, not to me).

>	making her rear view look more like the rear view of a horse,
>	thus appealing to sods and rednecks.

	IN YOUR (HUMBLE) OPINION.  If the rear view didn't look good before,
heels won't help any, but they certainly won't hinder.

>I am indebted to Germaine Greer for this analysis of high heels.

	Pay him back quickly!

>Ob Moto Content: Harley Choppers, being very large sexy motorcycles which
>are completely impractical, are the male equivalent of high heels :-)

	Not COMPLETELY impractical--you can get from point A to point B in a
style that appeals to you.

	Summary:  high heels look nice, but I wouldn't inflict them upon
anyone for any kind of regular use.  In fact, I'd attempt to dissuade anyone
about whom I care from wearing high heels, as they can harm the lower back. 

	Please take the PC rhetoric to rec.motorcycles.pc.bs, thanks.

Later,
-- 
Chris BeHanna	DoD# 114  KotHLF    1983 H-D FXWG Wide Glide (She lives!)
behanna@syl.nj.nec.com	            (I need another bike for this space!)

Disclaimer:  Now why would NEC agree with any of this anyway?
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles