HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Woman: will you go out with shorter man?
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 07:27:17 GMT

In article <1992Dec20.072245.5889@microsoft.com> jenk@microsoft.com (Jen Kilmer) writes:
>
>I've done it a lot. (Being 5'9", I'm taller than most women.) Funny
>thing is, tho, sometimes it does bother me. 
>
>It's because sometimes I get into a "I'm-so-tall-and-fat-and-bulky-and-
>clumsy-and-big" mood, and I want to be with someone BIGGER so I'll feel
>better.

Well, next time you're feeling big and clumsy, just think of me--6'4",
wearing XXXL-Tall shirts, and--in repeated consummate displays of
clumsiness--in the process of learning just how much more annoying having
to have to turn at an angle to get one's shoulders through a doorway is
when on crutches.

Trygve   (Alas, however, I think my shoulders are a little too firm to
          be called 'pudgy.')

--
"Jeffery Tate's apartment reeked of seduction, from the calculatedly
 uncomfortable chairs which would practically force a female guest to
 share his overstuffed and undersized couch to the prominent and well-
 stocked bar to the full-ceiling mirror over the bed with the little
 white letters that said, 'OBJECTS IN MIRROR ARE LARGER THAN THEY APPEAR.'"
Xref: sparky soc.singles:35004 alt.peeves:18629
From: 00cmmiller@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.peeves
Subject: Re: NeoLogisms
Date: 30 Dec 92 14:02:30 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1992Dec28.015710.17945@wetware.com>, drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
> cjp8b@dayhoff.med.Virginia.EDU (Chris Penington) writes:
> ] In article <c*51Hx=7fb@atlantis.psu.edu> R9S@ECL.PSU.EDU (Roberto G Sung) writes:
> ] 
> ] >just a quick question: what exactly means
> ] >"serendipity". i've seen this word a few times lately. is it part of
> ] >the neology? thanks
> ] 
> ] "Serendipity" refers to happy outcomes that occur by accident.
> ] Webster's New International Dictionary (3rd edition, 1961) says " an
> ] assumed gift for finding valuable or agreeable things not sought for".
> ] The term comes from a Persian tale "The Three Princes of Serendip"
> ] which happy outcomes keep happening by accident. It's NOT a neologism.
> 
> 
> Albeit that Chris's research is CORRECT,
> this does NOT change the fact that 'serendipity'
> as a BuzzPhrase of the Proto_Neo_New_Age_Pop_Psychology
> is not a NeoLogism, encumbant upon it with all the 
> horrid implications that it may well be one of the preliminary
> symptoms of a 'multi_phasic_personality_disorder.'
> 
> That there are those out there who have been using
> this NeoLogism for varying amounts of time does NOT
> bring the term within the realm of RealEnglish[tm] terms.
> 
> 
> ciao
> drieux
> 
> ObPeeve: Victims of Proto_Neo_New_Age_Pop_Psychology
> who are still in denial about thier problem.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Modern Day Problems:
> 
> This is Not a .sigfile addendum to the Post.
> You are just reading beyond the edge.
what is:  proto_neo_new_age_pop_psychology?
please?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: SF ISO S*M
Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 18:16:24 GMT

In article <75995@apple.apple.COM> pooh@Apple.COM (Pooh) writes:
>In the referenced article, aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>>Tell you what: I know *just* the person to use them on..... <leer>
>Better ask your mistress first ... ;-)

I *always* have her permission.

>>(And *where* did you find a riding crop with a metal end, anyway?)
>
>Most of them have a metal end, dear.  You're looking at the
>business end, not the handle. ;-)

Hmmmmm..... <looking around> .....don't see any metal on this one.....
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Virtual anniversary: yesterday!
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: desiree@netcom.com (Desiree Champagne)
Subject: Re: Women, Cats, & Chocolate
Summary: Meow
Organization: Time Out for Bonzo
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 22:55:42 GMT

In article <29DEC199211295913@acad3.alaska.edu> ftlao@acad3.alaska.edu (OSSANDER LINDA A) writes:

[20+ lines of quoted back shit deleted for my vision's-sake]

>You have a right to your own opinions.
>But I think perhaps you maybe the BIMBO!
>Now if you don't like that to bad..so sad.

	Linda, please, before you start playing on this here dang-fancy
whopping-big-BBS-of-all-time, learn to use an editor and cut down on
the quoted material, learn to proofread your material and do learn 
a new song.  That one is just too passe.

Ciao,

Desiree
Xref: sparky soc.singles:35210 alt.abortion.inequity:6261
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.abortion.inequity
Subject: Re: Maternity/paternity insurance
Date: 4 Jan 1993 00:03:52 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu

karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger) writes:

>In article <1i50iqINNjvu@gap.caltech.edu> peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
>>>Hey, that's what we need: paternity/maternity insurance!  Then we wouldn't 
>>>have to argue about forcing abortion, or withholding child support from 
>>>children, or insulting with contracts.  Why hasn't someone thought of this yet?
>>
>>This is rich!  Would we require all men to carry such insurance?

>How about all women?  I think that's at least as an appropriate requirement.

Sure.  All men.  And all women (of childbearing age).  Fair enough.

-- 

                                                --  Michal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there's no reason!  
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jps8@po.CWRU.Edu (James P. Schwonek)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Looking for that special woman.
Date: 23 Dec 92 23:30:20 GMT
Reply-To: jps8@po.CWRU.Edu (James P. Schwonek)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc12.ins.cwru.edu


Hello:

My name is Jim. I am 24 years old.

After four years at MIT, I am a programmer in the CWRU School of 
Medicine in Cleveland, Ohio.
I just received my MCAT scores and hope to be in Med School
next year.

I am 5' 11" tall with brown hair and deep brown sexy eyes.

I am single and looking for a white or asian woman for email
correspondence and possible meeting.

While my ultimate goal is marriage, I'd like to make friends first.


Hope to hear from you soon,

Jim

-- 
James P. Schwonek                         "One lesson, Nature,
SGI Iris Administrator/Programmer          let me learn of thee."
CWRU School of Medicine                           --Matthew Arnold
jps8@po.cwru.edu root@dpbiris.phol.cwru.edu
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Financial first-date negotiations
Date: 30 Dec 1992 04:13:59 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

gds@york.cs.ucla.edu (Greg Skinner) writes:
}Perhaps this is because some of us, instead of accepting traditional
}roles, have chosen to question those roles and define roles for
}ourselves more to our liking.

In article <095M03fBc6=w00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> jsp@pls.amdahl.com writes:
>Jeez, do you think you could be just a little more arrogant about this?

Somebody's got to be arrogant, otherwise roles would have never come to be
defined in the first place.

History demands that roles be periodically redefined and renewed as the old ones
become dangerously outmoded.  That is the purpose, the perogative, and even
the duty of our generation.
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: What is gold-digging?
Date: 22 Dec 92 00:29:07 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Dec21.215254.29553@cbnews.cb.att.com> eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (Piglet) writes:
 
|Oh, I am steadily working to increase the numbers of women asking
|men out.  Hey, Kiran, what're you doing Friday night?  Wanna go
|out or something?  Come on, women, join in with me.....

Hey, why should Kiran have all the fun?  How 'bout some of those women
asking the rest of us men out?

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Still More Answers to Dating Questions
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 10:20:33 GMT

tps@jptcs.COM (Tim Sailer) writes:
] 
] Great... that eliminates all the cheap shameless hussies... :)
] 
] Hmm... AND the educated ones...
] 
] Which leaves me with NONE!
] 
] Thanks for making my miserable exsistance utterly hopeless... :)
 
Always willing to be of service as called upon...

] Anyone wanna date a guy that can't talk?

I'm sorry, but this is NOT allowed.

ciao
Miss Drieux

-- 
Modern Day Problems:

This is Not a .sigfile addendum to the Post.
You are just reading beyond the edge.
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.pagan,alt.romance,alt.sex,alt.polyamory,talk.religion.misc
From: ljz57640@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (l.j.z. )
Subject: Re: Truth
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 02:22:50 GMT

uphrrmk@Msu.oscs.montana.edu writes:

>In article <86w9VB5w165w@freeside.com>, popec@freeside.com (PopeC) writes:
>>ivaliote@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Lotus ) writes:
>>
>>> kalki33!system@lakes.trenton.sc.us writes:
>>> >Yes, this is nice. The greatest beauty therefore is the greatest truth.
>>> >That is God, the Absolute Truth, Who is absolute ...>
>>You gots to exist before you can beautiful or anything else for that 
>>matter.  Where is your proff God exists?  

[puzzling deleted...]

>The greatest beauty is the greatest truth.  Cindy Crawford, the Absolute
>Beauty, therefore is the greatest Truth. God is the Absolute Truth. Therefore,
>Cindy Crawford is God!  All Pay homage to Cindy!  (Reverent bows in all
>directions, flowers and incence burned near a giant Cindy Crawford Pic, finding
>Meaning and enlightenment in the new Charlie Perfume commercial...I can see it
>all now!)

Um... just out of curiosity...
If "truth" = "beauty," then could someone please explain to me why the
truth is just too ugly to face most of the time?
Just something that's been nagging at me for a while...

>>

>                                   Not all thoughts are true, but most of 
>                                   them are useful!

Yeah, and sometimes nothing is more pleasing than the absence of truth.
Take it from someone with a Chronic Reality Disorder....         

TTFN,
--L.


-- 
laura j zurawski      juniper@uiuc.edu
"Sometimes you can't explain your actions,
       sometimes you can't explain yourself."
"PUSH THE BUTTON, FRANK!"
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: SF ISO S*M
Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 02:47:46 GMT

In article <1ho9snINNmms@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>>In article <ljug3aINN9ep@news.bbn.com> dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>>>Don't apologize.  Just let me know when you and Aahz are showing up so
>>>I can get my chains polished and oiled.
>
>In article <1992Dec28.191904.13752@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>>Just to set the record straight, I'm not letting those chains get used
>>on me.
>
>Ah, the greatest enjoyment comes from watching the feisty ones squirm and
>resist as they are overpowered, subdued and tamed by their new female masters.

Hmph!  I don't think my current female master is *quite* ready to turn
me over to someone else.....at least, not as long as I keep her
satisfied.....
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Virtual anniversary: 3 days and counting
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Women, Cats, & Chocolate
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 14:07:10 GMT

In article <1992Dec21.174346.3707@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
>aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>>Look, you dumb broad, ...
>
>ftlao@acad3.alaska.edu (OSSANDER LINDA A) replies:
>>Hello Aahz...
>
>She's definitely feisty.  Mayhap she might also be perky?
>And, most importantly, does she have any seesters?

Perky? Did someone say Perky? As in stand up and bark at the moon Perky?
I'll take those seesters, price is no object.
 
Which leads me too -- -- 3 seesters and a seester in law are coming to shake
me down for christmas.
 
Ebeneezer Scrooge actually had a lot going for him.
 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
                                 doh#0000000005
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: draphsor@deathstar.Stanford.EDU (Matt Rollefson)
Subject: Re: Beauty is only skin deep (was RE: Females have it easy)
Organization: Residential Computing, Stanford University
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 07:01:40 GMT

A small part of this post caught my eye, and I couldn't resist
responding in some way...

In soc.singles crafts@athena.mit.edu (The Invisible Man) writes:

>Some guys unfortunately have their brains between their legs and don't
>appreciate the attention they get from some women who wouldn't be 
>supermodel material.

Actually, I don't think this is true. Hell, if a guy is just thinking
with what's between his legs he'll appreciate *any* sort of attention
that's likely to end up in bed. Rather, some guys are too conscious of
the status which going out with a certain type of woman confers in
some peoples' eyes, and are unwilling to give up the status that an
attractive female brings for something as unimportant as going out
with a wonderful, loving, interesting person. (Please note heavy use
of sarcasm in the word "unimportant" - yeah, I know, sounds stodgy,
but I've seen worse misunderstandings on the net... :) )

Rollie
--
Matt Rollefson ("Rollie")               draphsor@deathstar.stanford.edu
Residential Computing, Stanford University	NeXTmail accepted
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 16:01:07 GMT

In article <oneil.724997190@cwis> oneil@cwis.unomaha.edu (Sharon O'Neil) writes:
>There is nothing wrong with being attracted to magazine models -- of
>whatever gender you prefer -- but the fact of the matter is that most people
>don't look like magazine models and most people never will.  So, looks
>certainly cannot be the most important criterion.
 
Hey magazine models have to go out w someone, so it might as well be me.
Don't sell yourself short or those shorts.
 
>
>I admit it: there's a certain "look" that I like.  But I'm not waiting for
>some devastatingly handsome young man to ask me out.  I'm perfectly happy with
>an average looking guy, as long as he has a great personality and treats me
>with respect.
>
>Sharon

Besides I'm rather busy.
 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
                                 doh#0000000005
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: gadfly@cbnewsi.cb.att.com (Gadfly)
Subject: Re: My SO and I have nothing in common
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 19:40:34 GMT
Summary: Remember, it's only a movie.

In article <1992Dec18.054531.19444@src4src.linet.org>,
ckunz@src4src.linet.org (Charles Kunz) writes:
> Recently, I discovered that my girlfriend and I have nothing in
> common, I still can't figure out what in heaven's name we see in
> each other.  Has anyone been in or know of someone in a similar
> situation?  I'm not quite sure what to do about it, at this point.
> Any useful info would help right now.  Thanks in advance.

Yeah--relax.  Surely you're both still interested in sex, anyway.
You probably have a lot in common (assuming you've been seeing
each other for more than a few weeks), but it may not be as
superficial as type of music, variety of sports, desserts, etc.
What about your family lives?  Experiences growing up?  Dreams for
the future?  And then, you may both be the sorts of folks who
prefer being around someone whose mind seems completely alien.
It's a situation I've been in for over 12 years now (as Don Adams
would say, *and loving it*).  It certainly makes those tastes we
do share that much tastier.

               *** ***
Ken Perlow   ***** *****
21 Dec 92   ****** ******   1 Nivose An CCI
            *****   *****   gadfly@ihspc.att.com
             ** ** ** **
...L'AUDACE!   *** ***   TOUJOURS DE L'AUDACE!  ENCORE DE L'AUDACE!
From: martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Real News
Date: 21 Dec 92 17:01:48 GMT
	<1992Dec21.043629.21730@netcom.com>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: rohwerwd@netcom.com's message of 21 Dec 92 04:36:29 GMT

In article <1992Dec21.043629.21730@netcom.com> rohwerwd@netcom.com (Mr. Tickle Monster) writes:
   >However, whether he is a sentient being is open to question.
   >--

	I can be, but haven't shown it that much on the Net.

I can dig it.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 20:48:20 EST
From: <JET3@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Picking up the Tab (was: Re: What is gold-digging?)
Distribution: na
 <92364.203332JET3@psuvm.psu.edu> <1992Dec30.134100.28409@cbfsb.cb.att.com>

In article <1992Dec30.134100.28409@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com
(james.j.dutton) says:
>
>In article <92364.203332JET3@psuvm.psu.edu> <JET3@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>>In article <1992Dec21.141317.19321@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com
>>>           No Need to be confused - It's dateing MAN - ooooooHHHHHH
>>>Hi I'm goin down to Schmoe's to slap down some sliders, comin? = you pay.
>
>>If I say let's go to the pub, comin'? = He still pays.
>
>For me at the very least.
>
>>Jean
>
>I may have to bring along *that* girl in Jan. We had a recent bout of Jealousy
>as opposed to Jeapardy.
>
JD you bad boy! What's happenin'? Hay - I say bring them all on and
let's have a party! There's no room for jealousy in my life, just some
really great times! Can't wait to be out there in Naperville, to meet the
gang!

>=-<  Bad Jean
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,soc.penpals
From: "A.J. Janschewitz" <p00258@psilink.com>
Subject: Re: Do you have a good pickup line?
Organization: Performance Systems Int'l
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 13:45:35 GMT
X-Mailer: PSILink-DOS (3.3)

>DATE:   Fri, 1 Jan 1993 02:06:06 GMT
>FROM:   Catherine Collingwood <Catherine.Collingwood@launchpad.unc.edu>
>Are you [here] alone tonight?
>
>...one that's never been used on me but would probably work...
>
>"Know any good pickup lines?"
>
>--the one and only Lady Firebird

Hi, Firebird ... know any good pickup lines?

Consider it used <grin>.

==a.j.==

*****************************************************************************
Agnostic disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are mine, honest to ahhhh...
*****************************************************************************
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Date: 29 Dec 1992 01:38:56 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Dec28.183540.1181@bnlux1.bnl.gov> schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:
>Add one more vote for
>Men-Who-Don't-Find-Christie-Brinkley-or-Cindy-Crawford-Attreactive-Because 
>They-Look-Too-Much-Like-Vaccuum-Formed-Foam-Dolls.  There is a very
>precise difference between "beauty" and "near-physical perfection".
>Brinkley and Crawford have (for the most part) perfectly developed
>features, clean, white teeth, flat stomachs and shiny hair.

It's not perfection I disagree with, it's the fact that the wrong definition
of perfection is being used.  Cory Everson is perfection.  Cindy Crawford
looks too much like a frail girly woman.

Brinkley and Crawford are most certainly not perfect.
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: SF ISO S*M
Date: 29 Dec 1992 01:33:11 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

>In article <ljug3aINN9ep@news.bbn.com> dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>>Don't apologize.  Just let me know when you and Aahz are showing up so
>>I can get my chains polished and oiled.

In article <1992Dec28.191904.13752@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>Just to set the record straight, I'm not letting those chains get used
>on me.

Ah, the greatest enjoyment comes from watching the feisty ones squirm and
resist as they are overpowered, subdued and tamed by their new female masters.
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance
From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
Subject: Re: About Dating Outside One's Group....
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 23:41:40 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1992Dec30.104358.12959@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:

>I will skip past my usual posting method and point
>out that there is a lot of unintended irony in your
>kivetch about 'religion.' You might take the time to
>pause and check that you have not gored any of your
>own sacred cows.

Ah, come on, cut Jimmy a little slack.  He just managed
to compose a complete, intelligible, grammatically correct
sentence for the first time in his life.  We'll work on
getting him to understand religion, tolerance, and other 
abstract concepts, eventually, but for now let's just
concentrate on getting his reading, writing, and math
skills up to high-school level.


Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ash@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (N.W.Ashcroft)
Subject: Re: Help, Want Singles Ski Club in Northern NJ
Reply-To: rna@leland.stanford.edu
Organization: Cornell Theory Center
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 18:20:59 GMT

In article <1992Dec21.175555.2531@walter.bellcore.com> tjj@nomas.bellcore.com (T. Jordan) writes:
>In article <102842@netnews.upenn.edu> crawford@ben.dev.upenn.edu (Lauren L. Crawford) writes:
>>I know, I'm crabby today.  It's this bronchitis.  Think I'll go home and
>>come back when it's gone.
>
>Everyone get colds, bronchitis, flues, etc. but not everyone has the 
>disposition of getting crabby during these times. I would suggest Lauren
>that you seek therapy so that every time your not feeling well you
>stop taking it out on who ever is convient to take it out on. 
>I'll be waiting for your apology.

Get real.

RNA

rna@leland.stanford.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles