HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles : YIKES!
Date: 8 Oct 92 16:36:26 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Chevron

In article <1992Oct8.151148.18612@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes:
>In article <1992Oct8.061812.26953@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>>Hey Lor, you wouldn't know what a flame war was, even it burned your
>>ass. 
>I was in flame war in this group while you were still in diapers.
>
>>Another idiotic bites the bullet. Through your own admission,
>>you admit you ARE NOT sharp. 
>Dumbo, you know any logic?
>
>  "it doesn't have to be SHARP to see your nonsense" != "I admit I am not
>   sharp." 
>
>You don't really know what an admission is. Ask Dave Meeks. We were in a 
>flame war in rec.sport.basketball.pro for 2 months because of an admission 
>he made.
>
>>Man, what a dweeb. If you can't take a ribbing and some BS, 
>Now that's an admission. You mean you have been posting BS?
>
>BTW, you still havn'et responded to the lie you posted, about Siefert
>being the active coach with the highest winning percentage. No guts?
>
>>Guys like you really make me laugh, you
>>have no idea how much fun I have getting your goats. 
>Rookies like you make me lick the chops. Trying to be a smart-ass but still
>don't know what you are talking about. You don't know much much fun I
>have to flaming you.
>
>-- 
>                                          Edward Lor
>                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
>                                          

Guys, guys, guys.  If ever there was a prime example of a
net.flaming.retard.war that should be taken to your respective personal
mail boxes, THIS POSTING IS IT.

Do us a favor and get the collective clue.

Thank you for your time......

J.J.Clyde.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: tap1040@venus.tamu.edu (SPEED RACER)
Subject: Re: POOL - Picks for Week #7 DUE THURSDAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (REPOST)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 00:33:00 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.194821.13143@colorado.edu>, davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood) writes...
>Week 7
>------
> 
> WT  Away                       Home
>*------------------------------------------------*
>[ 5] [ ] Detroit		[x] Minnesota        
>[ 5] [ ] San Diego		[x] Indianapolis   
>[ 5] [ ] Green Bay		[x] Cleveland      
>[ 7] [x] Philadelphia		[ ] Washington  
>[ 7] [ ] Tampa Bay		[x] Chicago        
>[ 5] [ ] Kansas City		[x] Dallas       
>[10] [ ] Atlanta		[x] San Francisco    
>[ 7] [x] NY Giants		[ ] LA Rams        
>[10] [x] New Orleans		[ ] Phoenix      
>[ 7] [x] Houston		[ ] Denver           
>[10] [x] LA Raiders		[ ] Seattle       
>[ 7] [ ] Cincinnati		[x] Pittsburgh (MON)
>[10] [ ] New England		[x] Miami                                
> 
>Initials:tap 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Bob Marshall)
Subject: Re: STATUS OF MONTANA...
Reply-To: marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 02:41:08 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.230426.20993@sequent.com>, patrick@sequent.com (Patrick Roddy) writes:
>I am interested in finding out whether the Niners plan to continue
>with Young at QB if Montana is ready to come in. As much as I worship
>Montana, I am suspect on messing with a winning package. Is Montana
>ready to come off of IR, or will he remain for a couple more weeks.
>Looking forward to watching the Niners in mid January.

Montana's status has not changed. It seems like the 49ers' management is
hardly even keeping up with his status. Carmen Policy was asked when
Montana was supposed to start throwing again, and his response was "I
think he's supposed to start throwing yesterday or tomorrow". And
Seifert regularly says "I don't know if he's been throwing or not".
I think the picture is clear; Montana is not coming back this year,
certainly as long as they keep winning with Young (even as difficult as
he has made it to do so).

=============================================================================
Bob Marshall                     \\     "It ain't age
Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.     \\     That makes me look this way
Sunnyvale, CA                      \\    It ain't the years, boys,
marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com\\   It's the miles"
"I tell the truth 'cept when I lie"  \\     - Chris LeDoux
=============================================================================
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Back to the future?
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 00:53:16 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.140253.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>
>       If the future is any indicator of the past, then:
>
>                        SB VII    Miami vs Washington   Miami wins
>                        SB XVII   Miami vs Washington   Washington wins
>                        SB XXVII  Miami? vs Washington? ????????
>
>       Just something to think about.
>
>                                         -doug THE dolfan-

Just one slight correction:

      SB XXVII  Miami? vs San Francisco  Niners WIN..Watters MVP
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
"I do not think that winning is the most important thing. 
I think winning is the only thing."    - Bill Veeck
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: MNF announcers--they SUCK!
Date: 13 Oct 92 21:25:36 GMT
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX


As much as you hate the MNF announcers, you had to love the comment by
Al Michaels right before the halftime interview with Deion Sanders:

"Never has one man traveled so far to do so little."

Cracked me up!  Get a life, Deion!

Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith)
Subject: Re: Request: Highest Score in NFL history 
Organization: Univ. of North Carolina @ Wilmington
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 18:57:52 GMT

rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith) writes:
>   This of course is a regular season record. The post-season record is
>73 pts (again by the Skins) in an NFL Championship game. I had completely
>forgotten this (what, Ross didnt check ALL the facts? shame on me!).

>   I would tell you the exact year, but all my record books are at home,
>and I cant check up on until later today.

1) open mouth, 2) insert foot.

I have made two, count 'em two greivous errors on the same day.

It was Chicago that scored the 73 pts against Washington in the 1940
NFL Championship game. It was a 73-0 shutout.

Oddly enough, the Redskins had won the regular season meeting between
the two clubs that year 7-3.

This is what happens when I start talking about games that happened over
25 years before I was even born... :)

Another fact to throw out (since I gave the two highest combined regular
season scores): The two highest combined post season scores both feature
losses by Miami. San Diego 41, Miami 38 in the '81 AFC divisional playoff
shootout. Buffalo 44, Miami 34 in 1990 in an AFC divisional playoff game.
-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
|rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu           Ross Smith              smith@oscar.udel.edu|
|    "I really hate that dog...." - Dr. Chase Matthews, Pet Semetary 2       |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: bstuart@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Ben Stuart)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Ugly Quarterbacks from the Raiders
Summary: Ugh!
Keywords: Where did they find them?
Date: 16 Oct 92 17:37:45 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

I saw the story by TNT during the Vike's game last night on Todd
Marinovich (sp?), 23 year old quarterback of the L.A. Raiders.  This
led me to recall that the previous Raider quarterbacks were all quite
homely.  Before Todd was Jay Schreader (sp?), before him was Jim 
Plunkett (sp?), and the last in my time was Kenny Stabler (sp?).  [I
must say that 'The Snake' looks much better in the booth, must be
that he's becomming more dignified with age.]

Don't get me wrong, I am no beauty and would probably fit in well in
this crowd, but where did Oakland/LA have to go to find these guys?
I know the Raiders have a reputation for playing 'ugly football', but
this is an extension that went too far.

BTW, the 'ugly' Jim Plunkett beat my Eagles in the Super Bowl (Jaws,
Montgomery, Carmichael & co.) so this isn't a comment on their
abilities, just an observation.

Ben
From: garyr@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM (Gary Rosen)
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 05:52:38 GMT
Subject: Re: Wild cards
Organization: HP Stanford Park - Palo Alto, CA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro

>(Gary Strand) / 11:47 pm  Oct 14, 1992 /
 > Gary Strand
 >I recall some 49er fans whining to an incredible degree last sea-
 >son because Atlanta won the 17-14 Atlanta game with a "Hail Mary". Folks,
 >that's the breaks.
	     ^^^^^^

 At least you admit it was luck! :^)  Actually that is more than I as a
 Niner fan would do - they should have stopped Atlanta earlier on that
 drive when they had them 4th and 12 on their own 30.  But the game
 WAS finally decided on a low-percentage play with 0:00 remaining.  This
 year we have the amusing spectacle of Dallas fans claiming the Eagles
 were "lucky" to beat them by 24 points.  Of course, all the people who
 flamed Niner fans for crying "luck" last year after the Atlanta game
 were consistent and flamed the Dallas fans this year as well.

 - Gary Rosen
From: wisp@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Wisp)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Denver (and a Montana note)
Date: 14 Oct 92 08:44:08 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England

In article <1992Oct13.174850.20621@kronos.arc.nasa.gov> blah@maas-neotek.arc.nasa.gov (TWF) writes:

[Stuff about the 'Skins screwing the Broncos (YEEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!)...]
>Just a quick note from today's (10/13/92) Boston Globe:
>
>Joe Montana is reported to have lost feeling in the "lower two
>fingers" of his throwing hand (not really sure which fingers are the
>"lower two").

That'll be in the butt, Bob!  Oops, wrong newsgroup...

Seriously, if he's got problems with the flexor origin on his throwing arm,
it'll be the ring and little fingers, caused by irritation/inflamation of the
ulnar nerve as it passes through. He's obviously *not* getting any better, and
potentially serious neurological complications (after loss of feeling there
comes loss of control of the small muscles of the thumb, which loses you
90% of the functional capacity of the *arm*!) probably mean it's time he gave
up the ghost and retired, or at least gave his damn' arm a proper rest
until it heals, which is what any normal/sane person would do. Repeatedly
trying to make an early comeback only prolongs and exacerbates the problem.

Not sure who're the biggest dickheads here: the 'Niners organisation, who're
presumably pushing for a return asap, the doctors who're letting him try,
or Montana himself. I guess the answer is the docs: playing with/through pain
is part of football, but there are some injuries that you *have* to allow
to heal completely and this is one of them. That's how they should be advising
him...

Just my $0.02.

The Wisp.
From: jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Eagles vs Redskins
Date: 15 Oct 92 17:32:24 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <93240@netnews.upenn.edu>, mckernan@RUMBA.SEAS.UPENN.EDU (Robert L Mckernan) writes:
> 	It will be a great game in RFK this weekend. Two things the Redskins
> have going for them:
> 	1. Play action passing. They do it as well as anyone.

A team can not benefit from play action unless they show that they can
run the football.  Kansas City game aside, of course.  The Eagles had
no idea that the Chiefs could throw the ball like they did so they
never even considered those plays to be play action passes.  However,
the Birds do know how well the Redskins can throw the football so they
will not be so easily fooled.

If the Skins can run the football they can benefit from the play
action.  If they can't, Rypien could be in trouble especially with the
injuries on the Skins offensive line.  Look for Clyde Simmons to have
a big game for Philly.

> 	2. Their pass rush shouls be effective against a weak Eagles
>            offensive line.

Again the key to stop the pass rush is being able to run the ball.
If Herschel is effective, the Skins will be forced to move their
safeties up to stop him.  This will allow Barnett/Williams to go
one-on-one with the Skins secondary.  Which has to be a little 
suspect due to the loss of Darryl Green.  If the Eagles can't get
Herschel going, Randall could be in for a very long day.

> 	If Rypien can get time to throw, I see the Skins winning.
> 	Prediction:    Washington   21
> 		       Philadelphia 17

Me too.  But I have to believe that the Eagles will be able to slow
down the Skins rushing attack.  This will put Rypien in definite
passing situations where the Eagles can just go after him.  I also
think that the Eagles offensive line can run block effectively enough
to get Herschel involved in the offense.  It will be one hell of a
football game, but I call it:

                          Philadelphia 20
                          Washington   16


E-A-G-L-E-S

Joe Dakes
AT&T Microelectronics
555 Union Boulevard
Allentown, PA  18103
alux2!jmd
From: bowen@ug.cs.dal.ca (keith graham bowen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: K.C. vs. Philly
Date: 7 Oct 92 19:38:26 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

In article <1992Oct7.161136.13163@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> seth@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (peter.r.clark..jr) writes:


>Let's see if I can have an intelligent dialogue with some Chiefs fans like
>I did with some Dallas fans...:-)

I am not a chiefs fan. The reason i follow them is because i like their 
arch-enemies, the Broncos..


>Talk about driving trucks into brick walls to see which survives. The best
>defense vs. the run against a team that has possibly the best, deepest,
>backfield today. This may be the one team in the NFL that could make the
>EAGLES bring in a safety to shore up the running attack. But let's say that
>the EAGLES *do* hold off the run. Does the OL pass block as well as they
>run block? I don't think that Krieg will survive the EAGLES pass rush. How
>old are the recievers? Will they buckle under after a couple of Andre
>Waters tackles, or are they veteran enough, and insane enough (:-)), to
>take it? You don't mention a TE. Do they have a good one? Do they use
>him? That's the way to beat the EAGLES. Jay Novacek could have kept Dallas
>in the game if he wasn't hearing footsteps and dropping balls. Until the
>EAGLES prove that they can stop a good TE, teams better start using them
>against the birds.



I pity the poor safety who has to try an stop Okoye.....

The Offensive line is good at pass-protection, but much better at run-blocking
The recivers are young, but they are fast. The reason i left out the TE is
that Marty Schottenheimer's offensive scheme always has the TE acting mainly
as a blocker, so no Keith Jackson-esque perfomances in this game...


>The EAGLES survived the New Orleans game, let's see if they can put down
>another strong set of LBs.


SURVIVED is the word for the New Orleans game....the Eagles will have to play
better than they did in NO to win against KC


>How is the Chiefs punter?

Nothing Special......

>So as I see it, the keys/questions for this game are:

>1) Can the chiefs be the first team in 50 games (yes, 50!!!) to rush for
>over 90 yards vs. the EAGLES D?


They have the best chance of any team to do it, and if they don't they will
be in REAL trouble.....

>2) Can the chiefs survive the EAGLES pass rush, and mount one of their own?

The eagles offensive line is the weak point of their team, so pressure on
Cunningham by the chiefs is likely.

>3) Can the chiefs blanket the EAGLES recievers?

That's what pro bowl cornerbacks are for....

>5) Can the EAGLES mount a running game?

The Chiefs have a great run defense, so Herschel has to be in top form for
the eagles ground game to work....

>pete clark jr.

-Keith
GOOOOOOOO BRONCOS!!!!
From: gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles lose: Where were the safeties?
Date: 14 Oct 92 12:35:21 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1ba2kfINNkgl@aludra.usc.edu>, tehyang@aludra.usc.edu (Teh Kao Yang)
writes:
>In article <douthit.718834370@scofflaw> douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit) wri
tes:
>>We will see you in Texas in a couple weeks.
>>
>>>                                EAGLES 27
>>>                                K.C.   10
>>
>>
>>K.C. just beat your beloved Eagles.  So much for your ranting predictions
>>and your 16-0 season.  We will beat you in Texas just like last year.
>
>What happened to the Eagles secondary? I've never seen wider receivers get
>THAT wide open!! Was is Izel "Toast" Jenkin's fault? Did Eric Allen play?
>
>-Tehkao
>
They were out to lunch.
-- 

------------------------
|   Gail A. Fullman    |
|   Manager - ADMO     |
|   Ext. 83113         |
------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullivan)
Subject: Re: Preview, Pats vs. 9ers
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 20:33:16 GMT

In article <1ave75INNh0a@bigboote.WPI.EDU>,
cor@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Cory Shimer) writes:


>anyway, here's my prediction.
>
>SF - 33
>NE - 17
>
>I think the line makers hit the head on the nail for this one....
>and I would stay away from this bet.

The Niners certainly should win by this or more, but won't.  I'd
take the Pats and the points if I were a gambler anymore.  My Niners
are notorious for making teams look real good that are large
underdogs.  I dimly recall a similar Patriot team with similar
problems give the Niners all they could handle in '89 at Stanford
stadium (right after earthquake.)  If the Niners are up by 10 in
the 4th, they will try to just run, run, run rather than get more
points on the board.

This game will feature a lot of deeper throws to Rice early on, to
get Young and Rice back on track.  This has been a big issue out
here in the press anyway.

>
>Special teams - Pats special teams are not too bad, but not great...
>                I don't know about 9ers special teams, but assume they
>                are good. The Pat's kicker is a dismal 0-2 for field

This is the best Niners special team play in years.  Cofer is back
on track, punter is best I've seen on Niners - (at least for these
few games anyway.)

>
>all the 9ers have to do is stop the Pats for the first quarter...
>if they slack off and let the Pats gain some confidence, the Pats
>might actually play better, like they did last year against good teams.

I agree. Thanks for the preview, I hope your Patriots have the game
of their lives Sunday, it is most fun for me to watch the Niners in
a tough game.

Mike
From: schmke@cco.caltech.edu (Kevin Todd Schmidt)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Schmidt Computer Rankings through 6-Oct
Date: 7 Oct 1992 15:51:54 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu

Here are my computer rankings through 6-Oct-92.

Philadelphia moves to #1 this week after the big win over Dallas.  Buffalo
drops to #2 and Miami moves to #5 as a result of their game.

I was only 3-8-1 against the spread for a season total of 32-30-2.
I was 7-5 in picking winners for a season total of 38-26.

I welcome comments and suggestions.

Kevin

															 Schedule
Rank Team                      Points  Record Strength  Last Week    Change
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1    Philadelphia              85.907   4-0-0  73.671  (  3,  82.385)  +2
2    Buffalo                   80.488   4-1-0  70.840  (  1,  84.643)  -1
3    New_Orleans               79.278   3-2-0  75.295  (  6,  79.227)  +3
4    San_Francisco             79.104   4-1-0  72.475  (  2,  83.552)  -2
5    Miami                     78.349   4-0-0  69.053  ( 14,  69.850)  +9
6    Dallas                    76.410   3-1-0  74.017  (  4,  80.521)  -2
7    Tampa_Bay                 75.177   3-2-0  70.656  (  5,  79.475)  -2
8    Houston                   75.069   3-1-0  69.575  ( 11,  73.476)  +3
9    Minnesota                 73.982   4-1-0  69.832  (  7,  76.541)  -2
10   Kansas_City               73.744   3-2-0  66.041  ( 13,  72.686)  +3
11   Detroit                   72.974   1-4-0  73.829  (  8,  75.049)  -3
12   Pittsburgh                72.314   3-1-0  66.804  ( 12,  72.874)  +0
13   Washington                71.105   2-2-0  71.846  ( 10,  73.622)  -3
14   Indianapolis              70.689   2-2-0  74.364  ( 20,  66.353)  +6
15   NY_Giants                 69.940   1-3-0  72.103  (  9,  74.805)  -6
16   Denver                    69.882   4-1-0  70.244  ( 19,  66.385)  +3
17   Chicago                   69.604   2-3-0  73.011  ( 16,  69.514)  -1
18   Phoenix                   69.115   1-3-0  77.150  ( 15,  69.604)  -3
19   Atlanta                   68.884   2-3-0  70.117  ( 18,  68.248)  -1
20   LA_Rams                   68.591   2-3-0  71.897  ( 21,  65.597)  +1
21   Cleveland                 66.723   1-3-0  70.554  ( 24,  62.633)  +3
22   Green_Bay                 66.520   2-3-0  71.048  ( 17,  69.422)  -5
23   Cincinnati                64.885   2-2-0  66.051  ( 22,  65.551)  -1
24   NY_Jets                   64.077   1-4-0  69.272  ( 23,  65.031)  -1
25   LA_Raiders                63.294   1-4-0  69.035  ( 25,  60.065)  +0
26   San_Diego                 61.552   1-4-0  70.284  ( 27,  59.380)  +1
27   Seattle                   60.409   1-4-0  67.200  ( 26,  59.821)  -1
28   New_England               57.468   0-4-0  68.391  ( 28,  57.892)  +0
-- 
Jet Propulsion Laboratory | schmke@cco.caltech.edu
4800 Oak Grove Dr.        | schmidt@spc5.jpl.nasa.gov
M/S 525-3684              |
Pasadena, CA  91109       |
From: gt6390a@prism.gatech.EDU (BERNSTEIN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Brian Blades
Date: 15 Oct 92 08:33:00 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


I'm pretty sure that this has been asked before, but what is the current 
status of Brian Blades WR Seattle?  He went on IR during week one of the season
and I've yet to hear about him since.  I heard that he was out for six weeks,
if so, where is he.  Does anyone out there have any info.  Much appreciated.
-- 
BERNSTEIN,AVRON P
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt6390a
Internet: gt6390a@prism.gatech.edu
From: mark@totaltec.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles 16-0? (was EAGLES WILL GO 16-0 IF ANYONE DOES)
Date: 7 Oct 92 13:56:16 GMT
Followup-To: <1992sep30.191643.12032@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>,rec.sport.football.pro
Distribution: na,usa
Organization: Total Tec Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Oct5.145339.22001@makesys.com>, john@makesys.com (John Turman) writes:
> 
>>THE EAGLES ARE THE BEST TEAM IN THE NFL BY FAR AND WILL GO 16-0 AND WIN THE
>>SUPERBOWL AND THE SCORE MON WILL BE AS FOLLOWS:
> 
>>                                EAGLES 42
>>                                COWPUSSIES 3
> 
> Who is this moronic idiot? He doesn't even realize that the Cowboys and Eagles
> can't play each other in the Super Bowl because they're in the same conference.

You don't even realize that the MON after SCORE means Monday asshole!
> 
> Get a clue asshole, learn about the NFL before you post this stupid drivel. And
> BTW you don't have to hear we can shout you.
> 

BTW his guess at the score was pretty accurate... EAGLES 31 COWPUSSIES 7
> This guy appears to have an IQ equal to the total score of his SB prediction.
> 

Why don't you keep your stupid drivel out of this newsgroup and get a life
you jerk