From: ehrlich@bimacs.BITNET (Gideon Ehrlich)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: The Nazi Arabian Leader (Mufti) AMIN HUSSAI
Date: 8 Apr 92 07:52:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: bimacs.3819
Organization: Math department, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, ISRAEL

In article <1992Apr7.061141.5528@newshost.anu.edu.au> bdm@cs.anu.edu.au writes:
>In article 3815@bimacs.BITNET, ehrlich@bimacs.BITNET (Gideon Ehrlich) writes:
>>In article <ktoch7INN748@girtab.usc.edu> jodar@girtab.usc.edu
>>(Nicholas Jodar) writes:
>>
>>>In article <3810@bimacs.BITNET> ehrlich@bimacs.BITNET (Gideon
Ehrlich) writes:

 ( Gideon)
>>>>Since Haj Amin al Hussainy was THE leader of the Muslim Arabs in the
>>>>Land of Israel , and since he did all his Nazi's activities on behaff
>>>>of all Arabs in the Land os Israel, and since he was reellected  after
>>>>WW2 while all his activity was known to every one, as the leader of
>>>>the Arabs one should define his activity as an ACTIVITY OF THE ARABS
>>>>rather than just as the activity of the Arabian Mufti ( religious
>>>>suprem leader).
>>>
(Nick)
>>>While Ronald Reagan was reelected as President of the United
>>>States, there is a large minority of people who never wanted him
>>          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>in office.  Can he then be said to represent 'all' the people?
>>>

(Gideon) :
>>   BUT  when Haj Amin al Hussaini, Hitler's personal friend and
>>supporter was reelected as the leader of the Arabs in the Land of
>>Israel there was not even a small minority who ever objected hs
>>reelection.
>
( Brendan ):

>More racist vomit from the poison fingers of Gideon Ehrlich.
      ^^^^^                 ^^^^^
>Apart from the word "supporter", which can be argued in a
>weaker sense than you would like, your entire paragraph is
>complete poppycock.  You obviously have no knowledge of
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Palestinian history.

( Gideon)
If saying and writing facts should be define as "racism" and
"poisening" I am glad to share thos features with the Britanica of
1967. ( Look for Hussaini Amin ).

>Husseini was appointed Chairman of the "Arab Higher Executive
>for Palestine" by the Arab League at the Bludan Conference in
>1946. There was no "election" carried out amongst Palestinians.
       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So  Brendan conviced us that then , like now , there is no democrathy
in the arabian society.
( Remember the election at Tunis ... ) .

Non Jews on that time did not defined themselves as "Palestinians".
there were then as now all kinds of Muslim sects, christians and
Gypsies, and others, using the term "Palstinians" in this context
may misslead the readers.

>and many Palestinians were opposed to him.  Even amongst those
>who supported his leadership, your effort to put support of
>genocide into their mouths is illogical; in fact, disgusting.

There was no objection to Hussaini on the base of his cooperation with
Hitler!!!!
>
>Finally, given that the Husseini family had lived in the
>Jerusalem region for at least 600 years, calling him "Arabian"
>is pretty stupid.

Totaly agree with you.
Hussaini Family ( as well as the nashashibi family , even being of the
oldest stranger ifamily in The Land of Israel are not here "for 6000
years" as plo propagander try to mislead. most of other non Jews
families are much much newer here , many immigrate here on this
century. Thus the PLO charter defins as "palestinian" a non Jew who
arrive The Land of Israel up to 1947.
( the PLO by the way was established by the arabian leagou).

Just Beduin should be called Arabs ( Arab literaly means  a desert
person).
Till WWI just Beduins were called Arabs, and all the rest were defined
according to their origin country : Egiptians, Magrabi ("western" -
from north Africa) Afgans,  Gypsies. According to their "sects":
Fellah ( farmers) , atc. or according to their taith : Copts, Marons,
and so on . Look at the Britanica of 1917 ( Palestine - population ),
and you will find there that using the term Arabs for non-beduine
started then.

The Term Arabs was used aspecially by leaders like Hussaini in order
to unify all Muslims in the area, christians are called arabs as well.
MY grandchilds  their nation is here for 3500 years , and are the 6th
genaration of continuoes living in this Land are "strangers" but the
Egiptian Arafat is a" Palestinian ", could one accept that ?

       Shalom     Gideon Ehrlich        ERETZ    YISRAEL
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish