HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Joseph_Jackson@transarc.com
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
Subject: Re: (none)
Date: 15 Sep 92 20:42:05 GMT
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

boche@VNET.IBM.COM (Ulrich K. Boche) writes:
> In RELEASED: Kerberos FAQ Version 0.0 (Trailer), references are
> given:
> >...
> >[6] S.M. Bellovin and M. Merritt, "Limitations of the Kerberos
> >Authentication System," Computer Communications Review 20(5), pp.
> >119-132 (October 1990).  [research.att.com:dist/kerblimit.usenix.ps]
> >...
> >
> I understand the network information to be file "kerblimit.usenix.ps"
> in directory "dist" at node "research.att.com".  When I tried to get
> the file via anonymous FTP, I was told the file didn't exist.  Am I
> off base with my interpretation or is there a typo in the FAQ trailer?

Try research.att.com:dist/internet_security
250 CWD command successful
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
From: boche@VNET.IBM.COM (Ulrich K. Boche)
Subject: Re: Problem Getting Paper by Bellovin and Merritt
X-Unparsable-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 92 01: 12:05 CET
Organization: IBM Germany, Ehningen
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 23:18:21 GMT

In <oehYhAD0BwwcQW9cMj@transarc.com> Joseph_Jackson@transarc.com writes:
>
>Try research.att.com:dist/internet_security/kerblimit.usenix.ps
>instead.
>
Thanks, I received the file now from this source.
>
>PS: Sorry if you got this message twice!  I had a disagreement with my mailer.
>
The disagreement with your mailer must have been a major one.  I counted
eight copies of your posting :-)

Ulrich Boche, IBM Germany FSC Large Systems
Disclaimer: This posting represents my own views, not those of IBM
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
From: schneck@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Bernhard Schneck)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
Subject: KerberosIV on multihomed hosts
Date: 7 Sep 92 22:41:40 GMT
Organization: Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany)

If I use kerberos (well, eBones) on a host with 2 Ethernet interfaces,
kerberized applications work when the destination host is on the same
interface as the KDC server, but I always get

	Kerberos rsh or rcp failed: Incorrect network address (krb_rd_req)
	rsh: Kerberos rcmd failed: rcmd protocol failure.

when talking to a service through the other interface.  I think this is
because the IP addr of the client is included in the ticket, and the real
ip address used to talk to the service is different from the one used when
talking to the ticket granting server.

Is there a fix/work-around for that?

Thanks,

\Bernhard.
--
Bernhard Schneck              | Email: Bernhard.Schneck@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE
GeNUA Gesellschaft fuer Netz- | TU Muenchen Physik | There is no problem so big
und UNIX-Administration mbH   | 8046 Garching      | that it cannot be run away
8000 Muenchen 83, Germany     | Germany            | from.   Illusions, R. Bach
From: Joseph_Jackson@transarc.com
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
Subject: Re: (none)
Date: 15 Sep 92 20:42:07 GMT
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

boche@VNET.IBM.COM (Ulrich K. Boche) writes:
> In RELEASED: Kerberos FAQ Version 0.0 (Trailer), references are
> given:
> >...
> >[6] S.M. Bellovin and M. Merritt, "Limitations of the Kerberos
> >Authentication System," Computer Communications Review 20(5), pp.
> >119-132 (October 1990).  [research.att.com:dist/kerblimit.usenix.ps]
> >...
> >
> I understand the network information to be file "kerblimit.usenix.ps"
> in directory "dist" at node "research.att.com".  When I tried to get
> the file via anonymous FTP, I was told the file didn't exist.  Am I
> off base with my interpretation or is there a typo in the FAQ trailer?

Try research.att.com:dist/internet_security
250 CWD command successful
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
From: glenz@ocsg.COM (Glen Zorn)
Subject: Re:  Existing authentication mechanisms have a deficiency
Organization: Internet-USENET Gateway at Stanford University
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 01:40:05 GMT

In article <9209082303.AA10434@ocfmail.ocf.llnl.gov>, nessett@ocfmail.ocf.llnl.gov (Danny Nessett) writes:


	If an organization wants to keep its authentication data in exactly 
	one place, existing authentication mechanisms are insufficient. As 
	Chuck Athey has pointed out, you need at least an entry for root 
	in /etc/passwd for the system to be administered and integrated into a 
	Kerberos realm. This means two sources of authentication data must be 
	maintained, one in the system's /etc/passwd file (or some surrogate 
	such as a yp database) and one in the Kerberos database.


I think you may be confusing authentication and authorization: even if a system
were completely Kerberized for authentication purposes, you would still need
some way to specify which principals were *authorized* to perform various
tasks, access local files, etc.  Probably you would want this control to reside 
locally, or at least be configurable on a machine-by-machine basis -- I might 
be trusted to administer a software development system, but not to browse the company's payroll files.  That's where the /etc/passwd file (or its surrogate)
comes in, in specifying which users (however they are authenticated) are 
allowed what type of access (if any) to the local system.

~ Glen


Glen Zorn       Network Security Analyst
glenz@OCSG.COM  Open Computing Security Group
From: Joseph_Jackson@transarc.com
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
Subject: Re: (none)
Date: 15 Sep 92 20:41:50 GMT
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

boche@VNET.IBM.COM (Ulrich K. Boche) writes:
> In RELEASED: Kerberos FAQ Version 0.0 (Trailer), references are
> given:
> >...
> >[6] S.M. Bellovin and M. Merritt, "Limitations of the Kerberos
> >Authentication System," Computer Communications Review 20(5), pp.
> >119-132 (October 1990).  [research.att.com:dist/kerblimit.usenix.ps]
> >...
> >
> I understand the network information to be file "kerblimit.usenix.ps"
> in directory "dist" at node "research.att.com".  When I tried to get
> the file via anonymous FTP, I was told the file didn't exist.  Am I
> off base with my interpretation or is there a typo in the FAQ trailer?

Try research.att.com:dist/internet_security
250 CWD command successful
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
From: nessett@OCFMAIL.OCF.LLNL.GOV (Danny Nessett)
Subject: Existing authentication mechanisms have a deficiency
Organization: Internet-USENET Gateway at Stanford University
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 23:03:34 GMT



It seems to me, after the discussion about su, ksu, etc., that something is
missing from existing distributed authentication mechanisms. I am not picking
on Kerberos here, since I think the criticism is valid for other systems, such
as SPX. What I mean is this.

If an organization wants to keep its authentication data in exactly one place,
existing authentication mechanisms are insufficient. As Chuck Athey has pointed
out, you need at least an entry for root in /etc/passwd for the system to
be administered and integrated into a Kerberos realm. This means two sources
of authentication data must be maintained, one in the system's /etc/passwd
file (or some surrogate such as a yp database) and one in the Kerberos
database.

In order to keep all authentication data in one place, there needs to be
a suid root routine on each machine that accepts a user id and password from
a directly connected terminal, requests the appropriate credentials from
the Kerberos server (or SPX CDC server, etc) and executes the appropriate
authentication test. This same suid root routine could be used by a modified
su utility or by any other program that wants to do on-machine authentication.


Dan Nessett

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos
From: warlord@MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
Subject: Re: KerberosIV on multihomed hosts
Organization: Internet-USENET Gateway at Stanford University
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 21:12:23 GMT

The short answer is, kerberos V4 doesn't do that.  Make sure you send
things out the same port as the kerberos server.

V5, however, will support this, once it gets released!

-derek
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: hta@boheme.er.sintef.no (Harald Tveit Alvestrand)
Subject: Why Sendmail fails /.../@gateway addresses 
Reply-To: harald.alvestrand@delab.sintef.no
Organization: SINTEF DELAB, Norway
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 08:41:31 GMT

Another FAQ piece - I feel that something is missing.
Can anyone help me out?

                   harald A

10) Why does mail to /..../@gateway fail?

This is a bug of long standing.

Typically, you see a message like:

<< /...../@gateway: Cannot mail directly to files

This has a long and convoluted history.
Usually, it involves a mailer that knows how to do UUCP.

It turns out that one program used in UUCP (uuxqt) is capable of
executing a large set of commands, some of which may destroy important
files if given filename arguments.

So, in order to protect this from happening, HDB UUCP will follow in
the tradition of fixing loose thumbtacks with sledgehammers, and
refuse to accept any command that has an argument that looks like a
filename that is relative to the root.

In the common UUCP setup, where only rmail and rnews are permitted,
this does not make sense, but it is not possible to turn it off.

In Taylor UUCP, it is a compile time option.
(This information supplied by Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>)

Another "nice" feature that helps in causing this is the "s" flag in
the Sendmail mailer definition. This strips the quotes off the local
part of the address, so that "/..../"@gateway gets turned into
/..../@gateway, which easily makes things go haywire.
This flag should be nuked on all mailers except the "local" and "prog"
mailers. Unfortunately, SUN ships it on all mailers by default, but then,
anyone who uses a SUN default Sendmail configuration has problems anyway.




-- 
                   Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Harald.Alvestrand@delab.sintef.no
C=no;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=delab;S=alvestrand;G=harald
+47 7 59 70 94
From: RICHARD%NET.EBT.ANRJ.BR@uicvm.uic.edu (Richard Sabah)
Subject: Re: CCITT or ISO Reference
Comments: @FPSP.FAPESP.BR - @FPSP.HEPNET - @BRFAPESP.BITNET - .BR gateway
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
X-VMS-To: MHSNEWS
Date: 14 Sep 92 12:16:36 GMT
X-Envelope-to: MHSnews@ics.uci.edu


    I would like to thanks to everyone who help me.

Richard Sabah
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: aaleigh@athena.mit.edu (Angela Leigh Beeler)
Subject: Sending mail InterNet <-> GEIS
Keywords: GEIS, mail gateways, Richard Nixon
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 17:57:56 GMT

Is there anyway to send mail from InterNet to GEIS (General Electric
Information Systems)?
Thank You,
ALB
 


Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: mskuhn@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Markus Kuhn)
Subject: Re: CCITT or ISO Reference
Organization: CSD., University of Erlangen
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 08:15:40 GMT

RICHARD%NET.EBT.ANRJ.BR@uicvm.uic.edu (Richard Sabah) writes:

>    I need help to locate the document with the alpha representation
>to the country identification.

Perhaps you mean ISO 3166:1988. This standard defines 2 and 3 letter
codes and a numeric code for each country (e.g. DE, DEU and 276 for Germany).
You can buy it at your national standards body or perhaps order it in
better bookstores.

A not very up to date list of the abbreviations is located in several
Internet ftp servers, e.g. at ftp.uni-erlangen.de in pub/doc/ISO/english/
ISO-3166-summary.

Markus

---
Markus Kuhn, Computer Science student -=-=- University of Erlangen, Germany
Internet: mskuhn@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de  |  X.500 entry available
-A distributed system is one in which the failure of a computer you didn't-
-even know existed can render your own computer unusable. (Leslie Lamport)-
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: hta@boheme.er.sintef.no (Harald Tveit Alvestrand)
Subject: Re: my X.400 address
Reply-To: harald.alvestrand@delab.sintef.no
Organization: SINTEF DELAB, Norway
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 07:40:50 GMT

Your generalized X.400 address (according to RFC 1327) is

<STD. attributes of your favourite gateway>;DD.RFC-822=user(a)dom.ain.name

C=us;ADMD= ;PRMD=Internet has been suggested as one default "gateway address".
It is unlikely to be supported by all X.400 networks.

I will add this to the FAQ.
-- 
                   Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Harald.Alvestrand@delab.sintef.no
C=no;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=delab;S=alvestrand;G=harald
+47 7 59 70 94
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: eitan@mlacus.oz.au (Eitan Froumine)
Subject: Re: Domain Defined Attribs Required ?
Organization: The Australian Centre for Unisys Software
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 04:40:56 GMT

roseberry@taney.uscghq.uscg.mil writes:


>	We have a product from UNISYS that claims to be X.400
>	compliant but it does *NOT* support DDAs (Domain Defined
>	them or are they optional ?

Unisys has few X400 products!

The product that I am using supports DDAs!

Tell me which one do you use (product style name, version and platform)
and I'll find out if it supports DDAs.


>	Bert Roseberry
>	US Coast Guard

>	roseberry@taney.uscghq.uscg.mil
Eitan

-- 
=====    Eitan Froumine     ==  Australian Centre for UNISYS Software    =====
====  _    ___  _      _   ==   ___                 ___   = eitan@mlacus.oz.au
===   /   /  /  /  /\__/  ==   /__  . _/ _   _     /__   == Ph: +61 3 550 1688
==   / __/  /     /   \  ==   /__  /  ( (_( ( (   /     === FAX:+61 3 550 1599
From: lantz@vicor.com (Keith Lantz)
Subject: my X.400 address
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Date: 15 Sep 92 01:19:19 GMT

Seems like the generalization of this should be a FAQ, but it's not in the
list, so: If someone asks me (lantz@vicor.com) what my X.400 address is,
what do I tell them?

Thanks in advance,

Keith A. Lantz                          Voice:  +1 415-617-1300
VICOR Inc.			        FAX:    +1 415-324-1408
525 University Ave., Suite 1307         E-mail: lantz@vicor.com
Palo Alto, CA 94301
From: Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net (Daniel Karrenberg)
Subject: Re: CCITT or ISO Reference
             <BuCsA5.L6D@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Date: 10 Sep 92 09:07:10 GMT
X-Phone: +31 20 592 5065
X-Organization: RIPE Network Coordination Centre


  > Markus Kuhn <mskuhn@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> writes:
  > Perhaps you mean ISO 3166:1988. This standard defines 2 and 3 letter
  > codes and a numeric code for each country (e.g. DE, DEU and 276 for Germany
  >
  > A not very up to date list of the abbreviations is located in several
  > Internet ftp servers, e.g. at ftp.uni-erlangen.de in pub/doc/ISO/english/
  > ISO-3166-summary.

A fairly up to date copy of ISO3166 including ammendements can be found at
ftp.ripe.net:ripe/docs/iso3166-codes.

Daniel

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: mskuhn@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Markus Kuhn)
Subject: Re: X.400 Specs - where to get?
Organization: CSD., University of Erlangen, Germany
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 16:41:50 GMT

Perhaps the following address should be added to the FAQ list as one possible
source of the X.400, X.500, F.400, F.500 and X.200 standards printed in 
the 1988 CCITT Blue Book:

     International Telecommunication Union
     General Secretariat - Sales Section
     Place des Nations
     CH-1211 Geneva 20

E.g. the reference of the X.500 standard is

     CCITT Blue Book, Volume VIII, Fascicle VIII.8, Data Communication
     Networks - Directory, Recommendations X.500-X.521, Geneva 1989,
     ISBN 92-61-03731-3, 20.- Sw.fr.

They'll send you their 'List of Publications'. Don't forget that there
is also an ISO version of the X.400/500 standard which you can buy at
your national standards body. The ISO papers are MUCH more expensive, but
define a few additional details relevant for privat networks.

Markus

-- 
Markus Kuhn, Computer Science student -=-=- University of Erlangen, Germany
Internet: mskuhn@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de  |  X.500 entry available
-A distributed system is one in which the failure of a computer you didn't-
-even know existed can render your own computer unusable. (Leslie Lamport)-
From: smith@sctc.com (Rick Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: A gentle intro to X400?
Date: 9 Sep 92 13:50:26 GMT
Organization: SCTC


Is there a readable introduction to X400 and its essential concepts?
I hear things about envelopes and OR addresses and MTAs and MSes
thrown around, and I'd love to find out what they are without wading
through ISO standards documents. Any suggestions?
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: hta@boheme.er.sintef.no (Harald Tveit Alvestrand)
Subject: New FAQ piece: What is my X.400 address?
Reply-To: harald.alvestrand@delab.sintef.no
Organization: SINTEF DELAB, Norway
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 08:11:48 GMT

I would like some comments on this one.

9) What is my X.400 address?

If you have an Internet address of the form username@domain.name, there
are two alternatives for your X.400 address:

EITHER there is a defined mapping onto standard attributes for your domain,
so that, for instance

   Harald.Alvestrand@delab.sintef.no

           maps to

   C=no;ADMD= ;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=delab;S=Alvestrand;G=Harald

OR there is no such mapping, and you will have to use a Domain Defined
Attribute:

  Someone@somewhere.com

       maps to

  <Std. Attributes of a gateway>;DD.RFC-822=Someone(a)somewhere.com

An IETF working document (draft-ietf-x400ops-mgtdomains-01.txt) gives
the suggestion to use C=us;ADMD= ;PRMD=Internet to mean "any gateway to
the Internet". This is not yet final, but might be supported on some
X.400 services. It is not likely to work in commercial services.

The following characers have special conversion rules when used in DDAs:

@       ->      (a)     at sign
!       ->      (b)     exclamation point (bang)
%       ->      (p)     percent sign
_       ->      (u)     underscore

All the hoary details may be found in RFC 1327.

A few places where you can use TELNET to a port, type in your address
and see what it maps to, are:

   relay.surfnet.nl(130.161.180.100) port 4545
   nic.switch.ch, login as "mailaddr"

NOTE: If you use gateways that do not conform to RFC 987, RFC 1148 or
RFC 1327, all bets are off. For instance, the kindest description of
the result of passing through the gateways of most commercial X.400
service providers is "interesting".




-- 
                   Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Harald.Alvestrand@delab.sintef.no
C=no;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=delab;S=alvestrand;G=harald
+47 7 59 70 94
From: ritter@claude.ma30.bull.com (Roger Ritter)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Looking for package by Comware
Date: 11 Sep 92 14:00:24 GMT
Organization: Bull HN Informations Systems Inc.

I'm looking for information about an email package that supports X.400,
produced by an American company called Comware.  Checking my local
library shows at least three companies with Comware in their names,
and I don't know which it is.  Any help will be appreciated!
-- 
Roger Ritter N1FZZ (R.Ritter@ma30.bull.com) PP-ASEL, AGI
1946 Luscombe 8A N71983 "Rocky"
Sheep do not so much fly as plummet!        NH CAP: Profile 49
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: mskuhn@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Markus Kuhn)
Subject: Re: Country codes; is more info available?
Organization: CSD., University of Erlangen
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 08:15:14 GMT

dank@blacks.jpl.nasa.gov (Daniel R. Kegel) writes:

>>A fairly up to date copy of ISO3166 including ammendements can be found at
>>ftp.ripe.net:ripe/docs/iso3166-codes.

>This document does look up to date.


I also updated ftp.uni-erlangen.de:pub/doc/ISO/english/ISO-3166-summary
yesterday.

>BTW, is there a document listing
>latitude and longitude for all of these countries?
>I would like to build a geographical distance measure that uses
>country names as input.

There are a number of machine readable maps available freely on the 
Internet. From a previous posting in comp.graphics:

----
The CIA world data bank is available for anonymous ftp at these sites:
 
hanauma.stanford.edu               pub/World_Map
spectrum.xerox.com                 pub/map
relay.cs.toronto.edu               doc/geography/CIA_World_Map
nic.funet.fi                       pub/misc/CIA_WorldMap
 
This is apparently a series if latitude-longitude pairs describing 
coastlines, borders, rivers, lakes, islands and the like. It is HUGE,
like 100 MB compressed (reckon 200-500 MB uncompressed, I haven't 
tried for lack of disk space). But it does sound good! 
---

I remember that it was only about 10MB of size, but check it yourself!
(And please don't ask me to mail it because you can't ftp! ;-)
Another map is alum.wr.usgs.gov:~ftp/pub/map.

It should not be too difficult to extract the data you need from there.
But you have to define more precisely what you mean by the distance
of two countries:

  - distance of the capitals
  - min/max/avrg distance of points within the borders
  - ...

Another nice idea for a de-luxe UA: If you receive a message, then in
a good system you'll also get the X.500 distinguished name. Use this
name too find the geographic location of the sender and show it to
the user on a small globe icon on on a map if it is in your region.
Nice idea, isn't it? ISO has already a standard for geographic coordinate
data, but they still have to define a X.500 attribute for this. Can we
expect this in the 1992 version? The Internet schema will perhaps define
one in the next version.

Markus

---
Markus Kuhn, Computer Science student -=-=- University of Erlangen, Germany
Internet: mskuhn@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de  |  X.500 entry available
-A distributed system is one in which the failure of a computer you didn't-
-even know existed can render your own computer unusable. (Leslie Lamport)-
From: mskuhn@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Markus Kuhn)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Where to register x.400 management domains?
Date: 10 Sep 92 13:37:10 GMT
Organization: CSD., University of Erlangen, Germany

I got a request from Eugene Crosser <crosser@pienet.msk.su> who can
only read but not post to this group, so I'm acting as an MTA for him:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
My firm is planning to provide x.400 services in exUSSR. Where should we
register Administration/Private management domain? I mean international
center, as there is no such national service here.

Thank You very much
Eugene Crosser,
Project Manager, PIE Systems International, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know of any established international registration authority
(at CCITT or somewhere else). So I'm also interested in the answer ...

Markus

-- 
Markus Kuhn, Computer Science student -=-=- University of Erlangen, Germany
Internet: mskuhn@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de  |  X.500 entry available
-A distributed system is one in which the failure of a computer you didn't-
-even know existed can render your own computer unusable. (Leslie Lamport)-
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: chinchau@iti.gov.sg (Low Chin Chau (SE))
Subject: X.400 Specs - where to get?
Organization: Information Technology Institute, National Computer Board, S'pore
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 06:54:55 GMT

Greetings to all, this is probably a FAQ but I could not find such a
posting so here goes:

My team is currently implementing an architecture for mail-enabled
applications and we'll like to evaluate the X.400 standard, OMI (of
Lotus), and MAPI (of Microsoft).  Could someone tell me where we
could get these specs or who in the organisations we should contact?
Appreciate any information that could help.

Thanks.
-- 
Low Chin Chau				chinchau@iti.gov.sg
Information Technology Institute	Tel: (65)772-0396, (65)779-5966 (fax)
National Computer Board, Singapore 0511, Republic of Singapore
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
From: RICHARD%NET.EBT.ANRJ.BR@uicvm.uic.edu (Richard Sabah)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: CCITT or ISO Reference
Date: 9 Sep 92 16:59:43 GMT
Comments: @FPSP.FAPESP.BR - @FPSP.HEPNET - @BRFAPESP.BITNET - .BR gateway
X-VMS-To: MHSNEWS
X-Envelope-to: MHSnews@ics.uci.edu


Hi ,

    I need help to locate the document with the alpha representation
to the country identification.

Thanks in advance

Richard Sabah

richard@net.ebt.anrj.br