HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ark@ukc.ac.uk (A.R.Khan)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
Subject: US MILITARY BASE IN BD?
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:11:29 GMT
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.


To: mukherjb@dsuvax.dsu.edu
Subject: Re: U.S. military aid to Bangladesh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.
Cc: 
Bcc: 

You not only have a positive notion about US military aid to Bangladesh,
but also think it is not impossible to manoeuvre such a deal for
Bangladesh. It is not good to be unrealistically optimistic. In the
late seventies and early eitghties, protests over an imaginary deal
over our St. Martins island found good amount of space in our dailies
and weeklies, so much so, that there was official denial from not
only BD Govt but also from US sources that there was none. But let
me tell you one thing before the feasibility question comes up,
the people of Bangladesh, rather I take pride to say, the agitative
nationalism (not in a negative sense, of course. That's how, C.P> O'Donnell
in his Biography of a Muslim Nation, describes Bengali nationalism
in a positive sense) of Bangladesh will not accept such a deal. I can
assure you that.  The frequently talked about gas deal proposal,
the eneffectivity of transit agreement - all are reminders. We are
not possible good administrators of ourselves and time, Insha Allah
will take care of it, but one thing is certain, we are no good
as ruled. So when somebody in the net(forgive me for bringing
in another issue, I am trying to make my point) says our
neighbours might take military adventures against Bangladesh,
I must say, first of all, there is no such possibility,
but even if someone contemplates, the above fact will serve
as a deterrant. Do you think the withdrawal of Indian
army in March 1972 was a birth day gift to the father of the
newly born nation? It was not. If you remember, unpleasan
incidents involving Indian army were being reported from
different districts of Bangladesh and Sheikh in fact requested
Mrs Gandhi to withdraw  the army earlier than what was planned
and agreed. Sorry for digression. But I am sure, the Philippines
style deal will not be feasible from Bangladesh from
neither side. Let's close the base on the net before it is opened
in Bangladesh. 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: indu@iss700.Columbia.NCR.COM ()
Subject: Re: Religious Tolerance and Muhammads battles
Originator: indu@iss700
Organization: NCR Corp, E&M-Columbia, Columbia, SC
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 18:33:52 GMT

To: milind@agni.cc.nd.edu
In article <1992Nov16.220541.21764@news.nd.edu> you write:
>ahmed-shakil@cs.yale.edu (Shakil Waiz Ahmed) in response to
>indu@iss700.Columbia.NCR.COM writes:
>
>>I have no intention of
>>following up to any more of your bigotted anti-Islamic trash which
>>isn't even original, but comes from books of certified losers like
>>Shorrosh.  If you really care, then you should look up Ahmed Deedat's
>>answers to Shorrosh's pathetic attempt at distorting history...
>
>Just who are Anis Shorrosh and Ahmed Deedat?  I am curious...

   Ahmed Deedat is one of the Islamic preachers whom Dr. Anis Shorrosh saw in 
   U.K?! Dr. Anis  is  an evangelist, who follows the path of Bible (which 
   he claims is the path of truth and love). At one of Ahmed's "discourses"
   Anis claims that he saw Ahmed spreading false hoods about the life of 
   Christ and Bible, in support of Islamic books like Quran.

   SO Dr. Anis Shorrosh challenged Ahmed then and there, and they  fixed up 
   a date for a public debate. Anis claims that  Deedat could not attend 
   any of the debates after the first debate, which was adjudged a draw.
   And Anis further claims that, Ahmed did not turn up for another bout of 
   Debates, but offered that his assisstant would argue. Any way, the story 
   after that is they never continued with their debates, I guess.
   
   Anis (who is Arab Christian) thought that his research about Islam
   should be put on paper, and wrote a book "ISLAM REVEALED". As anybody can 
   guess, owing to his Evangelic projects, he has given his own interpretation
   of various facts of Quran and Bible. 

   As per the T.V. shows which Shakil saw Dr. Anis did not stand 
   a chance in front of Ahmed Deedat (Shakil's claim).  Deedats followers add
   that ONE SHOULD those T.V.shows to make an assessment of Anis and his 
   capbilities. (BY the way, Shakil who are the producers of those T.V. shows?)

   Hence, Shakil argues that Anis's book should not be consulted for any 
   of the facts which Anis is prersenting.

   ( I think both sides are fairly represented, in this. But in case I missed
     or was mistaken at any point, please excuse me.)

>-- Milind Saraph
-Indu.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  My  views expressed above are made on a PERSONAL basis              |
|  No Group or  Organization   can be held responsible                 |
|                                ( for those in quest of truth .......)|
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: bhattach@quip.eecs.umich.edu (sayan bhattacharyya)
Subject: Re: Bangalis to be more worldly(Re: US military assistance to Bangladesh
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:24:45 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.013331.8875@zip.eecs.umich.edu> bhattach@quip.eecs.umich.edu (sayan bhattacharyya) writes:
>In article <BxoHHE.80M@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> rafatm@sage.cc.purdue.edu (unknown) writes:
>
>>The Indians talking over this network are idiots. They are the same morons who  have tried to convince us that a united Bengal will be better of. Besides,    
>>they have imigrated to the U.S. or are ABCD`s. Most of them are completely
>>out of touch with reality. 
>>
>>Regards
>>Rafat Sadiq
>>


>My dear Ashraf,
>
>Please do not make unsubstantiated generalisations.
>
>I think that the discussion on "united Bengal" was carried out as
>a "what-if" kind of thought experiment. I think it is unfair to 
>read malicious intentions into that discussion. It was carried out 
>in a friendly spirit.
>
>Secondly,  your allegation that "they" [Indians] posting on s.c.b.
>are all american-born or immigrants is unfounded. I am happy to
>serve as a counter-example. I am an Indian who posts on s.c.b. 
>and I am certainly not an American citizen.
>
>Hope this helps,      
>
>-Sayan Bhattacharyya.
>

The salutation line in the above should have read "Sadiq" and
not Ashraf. Sorry about the mistake.

-Sayan.



Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: bhattach@quip.eecs.umich.edu (sayan bhattacharyya)
Subject: Re: US exports toxic "fertilizer" to Bangladesh
Keywords: From SCI
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 01:10:53 GMT

In article <1e6ll6INNjar@CURIE.SYSTEMSY.CS.YALE.EDU>  ahmed-shakil@cs.yale.edu (Shakil Waiz Ahmed) writes:
> 
> This article appeared on SCI -- seems very relevant to SCB:
> 
> 
> From: John Bonine  E-LAW US <ejohn> 
> Subject: U.S. Law and Toxic Fertilizer Export
> 
> 
>            U.S. HAZARDOUS WASTE DUMPING IN BANGLADESH:
> 
> 
> Rather than implement clean
> technologies to reduce waste production, some U.S. companies are
> intent on finding cheap and easy dumpsites for their waste. 
> Increasingly, these sits are located in Third World countries. 

> In recent years, waste from the U.S. has been sent to less
> expensive and less regulated dumpsites in Bangladesh, Brazil,
                                            ------------------
> China, Haiti, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, the Philippines
  -------------------
> and other less-industrialized countries.
> 

Thanks to Shakil for posting this article.

I hope that articles like these convince the readership of the SCI
that the basic problems Bangladesh and India (and indeed all third
world countries ) face are very similar and we are essentially all
fighting with our back to the wall against a common enemy - the
exploitative world order which the rich industrialised nations
force upon us.

I am saddened to see that, instead of focusing on problems like
this, the readership of soc.culture.bangladesh (and the other 
subcontinental newsgroups) overtly engage in petty religious 
and nationalistic "net-war"s for the most part. When will we 
learn to ignore these inconsequential issues and take a united
stand, in the net as well as in the real world, on the real
problems that threaten us ?

Pessimistically,

-Sayan Bhattacharyya.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: bhattach@quip.eecs.umich.edu (sayan bhattacharyya)
Subject: Re: Bangalis to be more worldly(Re: US military assistance to Bangladesh
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:41:41 GMT


I do not believe that military aid will benefit the *people*
of Bangladesh in any way. It will only benefit the generals.

And we all know what that leads to.

Shubhechhantey,

-Sayan Bhattacharyya.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: 3040_3744@uwovax.uwo.ca
Subject: Hijacking of Democracy Re: S.R.I.A.
Organization: University of Western Ont, London
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 15:04:21 GMT

~r shah
From: hassan@cup.portal.com (hassan monu alam)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
Subject: Re: immigration, soviet passports
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 19:34:34 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

The free market hits the Russian Foreign Ministry :-).

Hassan
From: adnan@pender.ee.upenn.edu (Adnan Choudhury)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
Subject: Re: Religious (In) Tolerance & Muhammad's Battles
Date: 16 Nov 92 01:15:30 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Nov15.155937.16045@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM> indu@iss700.Columbia.NCR.COM writes:

>Somebody on the net, had  said incorrectly that Islam preaches religious 
>tolerance. Infact the exact  words were "Islam rules out other faiths. But  
>nobody is forced into it.". I would like to present the following facts 
>from the life of Muhammad(and Quran). These have been extracted out of a Book,
>Islam Revealed, by Dr. Anis Shorrosh. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANIS 'S  BOOK 
>HAS DETAILED DESCRIPTION ON EACH OF  THESE  TOPICS.

Somebody on the net is apparently quite persistent in indulging in this
form of hateful mispropaganda.  I think that the "religious tolerance"
issue has been addressed several times in the past by Shakil et al., and
I will not attempt to repeat them.  It seems pointless to reply to the
rest of your post, which contains volumes of misinformation.  The
unfortunate part is that you seem to really believe it all!  Please read
some other books before reaching such preposterous conclusions.  

- Adnan

"I am returning this otherwise good typing paper to you because someone
has printed gibberish all over it and put your name at the top."
					- An English professor

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"If there's nothing wrong with me,      | ADNAN CHOUDHURY
then maybe there's something wrong 	| adnan@eniac.seas.upenn.edu
with the universe!"			| adnan@pender.ee.upenn.edu
              - Dr. Beverly Crusher     | University of Pennsylvania
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: haque@sunray.ece.clarkson.edu (Anisul Haque,,,)
Subject: Re: HELP!
Reply-To: haque@sunray.ece.clarkson.edu
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:03:44 GMT


In article 0106@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA, Z36Q000 <Z36Q@UNB.CA> () writes:
> Can anybody help me to find the address and telephone no. of my friend?
> HE was doing his MS (GEOLOGY) in the UNIV., OF TEXAS---A&M., last
> year.  His name is:
>                  RAQUIBUDDIN AHMED
> Thanks.
> 

His present address and phone # is 

4110 College Main # 41
Bryan, TX 77801

Ph (409)-846-2611



Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: milind@agni.cc.nd.edu (Milind Saraph)
Subject: Re: Religious (In) Tolerance & Muhammad's Battles
Reply-To: milind@agni.cc.nd.edu (Milind Saraph)
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame 
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 22:05:41 GMT

ahmed-shakil@cs.yale.edu (Shakil Waiz Ahmed) in response to
indu@iss700.Columbia.NCR.COM writes:

>I have no intention of
>following up to any more of your bigotted anti-Islamic trash which
>isn't even original, but comes from books of certified losers like
>Shorrosh.  If you really care, then you should look up Ahmed Deedat's
>answers to Shorrosh's pathetic attempt at distorting history...

Just who are Anis Shorrosh and Ahmed Deedat?  I am curious...

-- Milind Saraph

Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: nd3375@meibm5.cen.uiuc.edu (Nishit Dey)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
Subject: Re: aid and bangladesh military
Date: 18 Nov 92 05:35:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.BxwCvt.KJt
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

mahmud-mehdi@yale.edu (Mehdi Mahmud) writes:

>In article <ZAHIN.92Nov16215414@occs.cs.oberlin.edu> zahin@occs.cs.oberlin.edu (Kazi Zahin S. Hasan) writes:

>>A couple of points.

>	...article deleted...

>The following excerpt is unabashedly taken from the New York 
>Times without their permission:
>	
>	HOW ONE SOMALI FAMILY, SOME OF IT, SURVIVES
>	 by: Jane Perlez

>BARDERA, Somalia, Nov12 - By traditional Somali standards, the family
>of Nur Ibrahim Omer and his wife, Fatima, was well-to-do. They herded
>livestock over vast and empty spaces, drank camel's milk and
>celebrated with singing and dancing when the seasons were good. They
>were entirely self-sufficient, living a pastoral existence that had
>changed little for centuries.
>   Modernity arrived about three yeasr ago when men from a rival
>sub-clan armed with assault rifles, instead of the usual spears, swept
>in and stole their camels, cattle and goats. Bereft of their wealth
>and the means to recreate it, the once-proud family began a steady
>slide into destitution.
>   In August, after three of their children died and the last grain
>was gone, Mr. Omer and his wife, Fatima Ali Abdi, bundled up their
>favorite cooking pots, collected their three surviving children and
>shuffled, stooped and weak, for the three days to this bush outpost...

>	...rest of article deleted...

>I think that adequately summarizes the reasons why military buildup
>is essential to economic development, especially when we are 
>surrounded by powerful neighbors. The argument has been proferred 
>that our neighbors have nothing to gain from an invasion... true
>for the present; but what happens when we *do* get around to 
>building a stronger economy... will that be as true then? 

How about going the other way, i.e., Build a strong economy first and
then go for a stronger military with those money to protect yourself from
the greedy neighbors. That way you don't have to beg for money from other
countries to maintain your military.



>With best wishes.
>Asif
>-- 
>~mahmud@cs.yale.edu		Strategic thinking is the art of outdoing
>~Mehdi Mahmud			an adversary always remembering that he is
>~P.O. Box 688 Yale Station	trying to do the same to you.
>~New Haven, CT 06520.		   - Dixit & Nalebuff (Strategic Thinking)

Nishit
From: B.Kumar@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
Subject: Re: CFV: soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya moderated
Date: 19 Nov 92 13:00:32 GMT


>> In article <1e9kpbINNm5v@CURIE.SYSTEMSY.CS.YALE.EDU> ahmed-shakil@cs.yale.ed
u (Shakil Waiz Ahmed) writes:
>But even casting that aside, let us look at Prophet Muhammed's (pbuh)
>last sermon which he gave on the ninth day of Dhul Hijjah, 10 A.H. in
>the Uranah valley of Mount Arafat:
>
>   O People, NO PROPHET OR APOSTLE WILL COME AFTER ME AND NO NEW FAITH
>   WILL BE BORN. Reason well, therefore, O People, and understand my
>   words which I convey to you. I leave behind me two things, the QUR'AN
>   and my example, the SUNNAH, and if you follow these you will never go
>   astray.
>

Is n't Mohammed proved wrong here?  "- No new faith will be
born .". Huun... May be Mr Mohammed had no idea about Sikhism, Bahaism 
and Kabir Panthis - all started after Mohammed's above declaration. I am 
quite sure that there would be many other minor faiths, all started after 
his above (pompous) declaration. Seems like Mr GOD was playing a joke 
on Mr Mohammed or someone is misquoting GOD/Mohammed.

bkumar
From: hassan@cup.portal.com (hassan monu alam)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
Subject: Islamic Sects
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 22:01:17 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

When I was growing up, people in my area were grouped into three classes
by Muslims:

1) Muslims
2) Kafirs
3) Ghair-Muslims

Muslims and Kafirs were simple - believers and non-believers. However
Ghair-Muslims were the interesting category. If you were a Sunni,
the Shia's were Ghair-Muslims, and vice-versa. Ghair-Muslims simply
tranlated to somewhere between Muslim and Kafir. 

While Shias and Sunnis tolerated each other in the Sub-Continent, my

two years in Iran were a different experience. There Sunnis were
definitely not regarded as fellow believers. Not kafir, but 
definitely not true followers.

This flap over Ahamadis (and in other instances Qadianis) smacks
of a similar split.

If they want to call themselves Muslim, let them. After all we
are all Gods children :-).

Hassan
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: f43703a@nucc.cc.nagoya-u.ac.jp (SUPRATIC GUPTA)
Subject: Conversion to ISLAM/ Do I have to leave my beloved wife?
Organization: Nagoya University Computation Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 06:09:34 GMT


Dear readers,

     One more question. One of my friends wrote to me by email
 That a muslim should mix with muslims only. (preferablely). He
must mix with muslim comunity, as the non-muslims will betray
a muslim (I really don't know why?).

I like your coments on it.

Now suppose if I convert ti Islam, do I have to leave my beloved
wife and all my dear family members? They are all strict HINDU and
pray multiple GOD, pray IDOLS, in short they are all KHAFIRS. Should/must
I leave there comunity and join muslim comunity where I don't have any
friends in INDIA. Here I have many muslim friends. Should I send my
son to only ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF TECKNOLOGY rather then Indian Institute
of TECHNOLOGY? Should I forbid my children to mix with HINDUS?

I will appreciate your coments? Please use simple words. I will
beleave that you are speaking the truth. Please don't refer to
texts. I get confused. Refer to text and then please reply in
simple words.

with regards
SUPRATIC GUPTA
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: zmhasan@db.toronto.edu (Masum Z. Hasan)
Subject: More Poem
Followup-To: soc.culture.bangladesh
Keywords: Poem, Tagore
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Date: 20 Nov 92 20:43:54 GMT


More gem by Tagore. Enjoy.

_____________________________________________________________________

Akash bhora shurjo tara
Bishwa bhora pran
Tahari majkhane ami peyechhi peyechhi mor sthan
Bishowye tai jage, jage amar gaan

Asim kaler je hillole
Joar bhatae bhubon dole
Narite mor raktadharae legechhe tar Tan
Bishowye tai jage, jage amar gaan

Ghase ghase pa phelechhi
Boner pathe jete
Phuler gandhe chamak lege uthechhe mon mete
Chhariye achhe ananderi gan

Kan petechhi chokh melechhi
Dharar buke pran dhelechhi
Janar majhe ajanare karechhi sandhan
Bishowye tai jage, jage amar gaan

                       ----Rabindranath Tagore
_____________________________________________________________________


The sky is filled with stars and the sun,
this earth with life vibrant.
Among it all I too have received a home
out of this wonder my song is born.
In the rhythm of ebb and tide of eternal time
the world floats,
its pull enters the blood stream
that through my nerves flows.
Out of this wonder my song is born.
I have trodden on grass passing through the wood
my mind infused with the surprise that the smell of flowers brings,
spread around me are such delightful gifts.
I have lent my ears, opened my eyes,
on the bosom of this earth poured forth my life,
looking for the unknown in all that I know.
This wonder brings forth my song.

                       ----Rabindranath Tagore
		       Translation by Pratima Bowes
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

##############################################################################

Masum Z. Hasan
zmhasan@ois.db.toronto.edu
zmhasan@neumann.uwaterloo.ca

To each dimension, as, with the flight of time, it disappears from view, we
should say: now you are becoming the Past. But possibly later at a critical-
perhaps fortunate - moment we may meet again on a new dimension, and once again
you may become the Present. Paul Klee (On Modern Art).

##############################################################################


Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: sahmed@occs.cs.oberlin.edu (Saif Ahmed)
Subject: Re: waste dumping in Bangladesh
Organization: Oberlin College Computer Science
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 00:22:36 GMT
X-Posted-From: occs.cs.oberlin.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <ZAHIN.92Nov17003359@occs.cs.oberlin.edu> zahin@occs.cs.oberlin.edu (Kazi Zahin S. Hasan) writes:
   In article <1e6ll6INNjar@CURIE.SYSTEMSY.CS.YALE.EDU> ahmed-shakil@cs.yale.edu (Shakil Waiz Ahmed) writes:

>>  This article appeared on SCI -- seems very relevant to SCB:

>[very good article deleted]

>>		 GREENPEACE AND UBINIG RECOMMENDATIONS
>>
>[more good stuff deleted]
>>  We recommend that the Government of the United States: 
>>  * Immediately reimport the hazardous waste illegally exported to
>>  Bangladesh.
>>  * Enact legislation to prohibit all future international waste
>>  exports, especially to Third World countries.

>A suggestion to those scb-readers who are US citizens:

>Perhaps you should think about writing to your congressman/senator
>about this. A few letters won't work miracles, but they would be a
>start.

>This is just a suggestion, I hope nobody takes it the wrong way. 


It is not entirely the fault of the U.S. government. The BD government
knew full well that this fertilizer was hazardous. The U.S. govt
informed them before the shipment ever got there that the material was
hazardous and should not be accepted. Some person must have made some
money out of this by allowint the fertilizer to come through.

Saif
--
                                                                          _
                                                                         / \
 ________________________________________________________________________\_/
/ \  							                   |
\_/                                                                        |
| | Saifuddin Ahmed                                                        |
| | sahmed@occs.cs.oberlin.edu                                             |
| |________________________________________________________________________/
\_/


Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh
From: umera@Msu.oscs.montana.edu (Ruhul Amin)
Subject: Re: Tropical cyclone
Reply-To: umera@Msu.oscs.montana.edu (Ruhul Amin)
Organization: Montana State University
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:26:44 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.055552.3152@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>, tnk@cloud1.met.fsu.edu (T.N. KRISHNAMURTI) writes:
>
>That tropical cyclone which was reported by Jack Beven is heading for Chitta-
>gong area and looks like a killer storm again. If you have relatives close to 
>any of coastal or near inland areas call them and warn them right away. The
>Storm is very intense 145 mile per hour winds at present. Landfall expected in 
>24 h from now. Krishnamurti.


According to Radio Australia news (monitored this morning), the cylone has
already hit the southern part of Bangladesh.  The devastation is quite intense.
The reception of the news was not very clear.  But I think I heard that it was
one of the worst (again?). If anyone has more information, please post.

-- Ruhul Amin
Newsgroups: soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.pakistan
From: ahmedss@ntmtv.UUCP (Syed Ahmed)
Subject: Long March News
Keywords: News on Long March
Reply-To: ahmedss@ntmtv.UUCP (Syed Ahmed)
Organization: Northern Telecom Inc, Mountain View, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:23:13 GMT


Police teargassed about 20,000 long-marchers/protestors in the
twin cities of Rawalpindi- Islamabad.

Any more................

Syed Ahmed.