HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: arkay@leland.Stanford.EDU (Abdur Khan)
Subject: Re: Australian cricket season starts ......
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 92 00:32:06 GMT

In article <karnik.719267616@exa> karnik@exa.cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik) writes:
>In <1992Oct16.185313.18228@leland.Stanford.EDU> arkay@leland.Stanford.EDU (Abdur Khan) writes:
>
>>|> however, india beat every team it played comprehensively, something that no
>>|> other WC winning team has done- even the WI of 75 and 79 had 2-3 close matches.
>>|> 
>
>>I have to come out and say this, even though me pakistani, India is the best
>>team in the world, best batsmen and best kapil dev. We nearly won the world cup
>>if it wasn't for the rain and a few other matches we lost. After playing
>>for four months in australia and getting used to the weather, the weather
>>suddenly changed, it is not there fault. They good team, they also have
>>gavaskar and he very good player. you see in South Africa they beat south
>>africa , you see.
>
>>sahibzada rafay khan [ that takes a load of my chest]
>
>	
>	This is totally unnecessary. No one is arguing that India has the
>best team in the world at this time, but the quoted article was simply a 
>response to the allegation that India's WC victory was a fluke (accompanied
>by a misquotation of Gavaskar). So your post, with all its dripping sarcasm
>(sic) was uncalled for.... Just my opinion...
>

unnecessary, maybe but India won the World Cup eight years ago. Lets talk about
how good the team is right now. An average batting line with mediocre bowlers.
Except for tendulkar no exciting player. the selectors/ team politics seem to have made sure that players like amarnath/vengsakar are no longer in the team
and Kapil Dev has been turned into a stock bowler.

Simarlarly pakistan might be the team with the most talent but they can play
120 percent and 20 percent as shown by the one day series in England. Pakistan
is good and might be for another few years but to always bring back how good
you were, which itself is debatable, is ........................

sahibzada rafay khan
From: pmc5@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Paul M Corballis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: "We are the world " Team of 80's
Date: 12 Oct 92 14:48:14 GMT
Reply-To: pmc5@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Paul M Corballis)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <1992Oct10.144226.9394@vax.oxford.ac.uk> mcbean@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
>In article <1992Oct9.140223.13593@news.columbia.edu>, pmc5@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Paul M Corballis) writes:
>> In article <1992Oct8.140340.9354@vax.oxford.ac.uk> mcbean@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
>>>In article <1992Oct8.154513.11307@waikato.ac.nz>, sma@waikato.ac.nz (Stephen Anderson) writes:
>>>> In article <92281.195206HH9679A@auvm.american.edu>, Howard E. Hill-Esbrand 
>>>> <HH9679A@auvm.american.edu> writes:
>
>So Hadlee owes his wickets to Chatfield?   This is my last word on these so
>called bowling partnerships.  Why is it that one-bowler teams never put
>together a solid string of performances at test level, even when the one bowler
>in question is returning very impressive figures?
>
>Because if the sole bowler does not take any wickets, none are going to fall. 
>Therefore he will always pick up a 5-wicket haul more often than not.  If
>Marshall missed the openers, they were going to fall to Holding or Garner or
>whoever else was there.   It is instructive to note that some of Marshall's
>most destructive performances came when the pace quartet was in transition,
>i.e. when the competition was less fierce.  His wicket haul tailed off again
>once he had to compete with Ambrose and the unfortunate Bishop for wickets.
>

Then perhaps you'd like to explain why New Zealand, a "one bowler side",
was one of the most consistently competitive teams in the world between
1978 and about 1985?  I agree with your point that the WIndies pace
quartet(s) had to compete with each other for wickets, but I just don't
buy the idea that Chatfield was such a mediocre bowler.  I'm not suggesting
that Hadlee owes all his wickets to Chatfield, either.  Perhaps if we
consider another duo - Lillee and Thomson - my case will be clearer.  I
suspect that if Thommo had not been bowling opposite Lillee, then he
would not hold the place that is (rightfully, BTW) his in cricket history.
I'm not trying to say that partnerships are all that matter, but it 
doesn't pay to discount them, either.

Cheers, Paul

P.S. This is fun, isn't it?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4711,,21273)
Subject: Re: Six sixers in the same over!
Reply-To: shamim@bellcore.com
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 22:13:25 GMT


Sobers hit 6 6's off M. Nash of Glamorgan in 1968.
Shastri hit 6 6's of Tilak Raj of Baroda in Bombay in 1984.
These are the only two instances in first class cricket. 

Four or five people have hit 5 6's in an over. Some of these are legitimate 
in the sense that the opposition was not bowling "donkey drops". 

Majid Khan hit Davis of Glamorgan for 5 6's in an over in 1967 (606666). Majid had gone 
to England as Pakistan's star batsman (he was batting at number 4 in those days). He 
made a lot of runs in county cricket but had Hick like failures in tests. He took his 
frustration out on Glamorgan, hitting 147 no with 13 sixes. The record by the way for 
most sixes in an innings is held by Reid of NZ who had 15 against a NZ first class side. 

Surprisingly, Zaheer Abbas hit Breakwell of Somerset for four sixes in an over (466626). 
Surprising because Zaheer was not into lofted shots. 

Finally, it may be more interesting to find out some great bowlers who got hit 
for a lot of runs in an over. I recall reading that Verity had 30 runs taken off an over 
by a South African batsman but I have no details. 


	--SAN



Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: John.Mcmullan@comp.vuw.ac.nz (John Michael McMullan)
Subject: Ewen Chatfield
Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Victoria Uni. of Wellington, New Zealand.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 03:11:40 GMT


Boy did I get s#!t for sticking up for poor old Ewen Chatfield. Take the hint
guys. If you want to say anything good about someone make sure that you say it
in such a way that it can be construed as criticism if someone doesn't like
it.

BTW I haven't seen this wee snipet on here yet so...

NZ will be going to Sri Lanka minus Danny Morrison (knee injury) and of course
you all know they will be minus Chris Cairns as well. As of this moment Martin
Crowe is in bed with a very bad fever. He is expected to be fit in time to
tour, but Sri Lanka could be in for a very good season Re: Aussie Tour.

:)
From: sr3u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Shrisha Rao)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: India's forthcoming tours
Date: 9 Oct 92 17:38:47 GMT
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

There has been a lot of discussion on the net recently re the merits of
selection or non-selection of various players into the Indian team.
There is another issue which is, in my view, of at least as much
importance. That is the selection of umpires for the SA/Zim series. As
Zimbabwe has not played tests before, and SA has been out of the
international reckoning for a while, I figure there might be a shortage
of well-qualified umpires who could do a good job at the international
level. It would have been better if neutral umpires had been appointed
for the tour, tho I don't think the standard of umpiring in SA or
Zimbabwe will be as abysmally low as it was when India toured Australia,
where the glaring omissions and commissions of sin by Messrs. King et al
are too well-known to need repetition. It would still be good, tho, to
avoid situations where either side can give the umpires' inexperience or
incompetence as an excuse for its own lapses.
From: diwadkva@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu (Vaibhav A. Diwadkar)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: World rankings
Date: 15 Oct 92 17:40:00 GMT
Organization: Vanderbilt University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Oct14.073931.24718@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>, 
telsor@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Robert Morieson) writes...

> 
>Towards the end of the Sri Lanka tour, Dean Jones, In his regular column
>in the 'Sunday Age' newspaper, said that most of the Australian team
>considered Sri Lanka to have a better team than India.
> 
>No flames please I'm just the messenger :)

	- Don't think you should expect any.  SL won the ODI series and 
	should(?) have won the test series as well.  Hell, Deano Jones 
	should be writing most of the Australian team considered SL to have
	a better team than Australia.

					- Vaibhav.

>-- 
>I stab myself with the knife of life, to burn away the pain.
>Telsor@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au
>Robert Morieson
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: rsingi@penuts.enet.dec.com (Rajesh Singi)
Subject: Re: Six sixers in the same over!
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 14:08:48 GMT


In article <1992Oct9.070736.26391@cc.uow.edu.au>, g9220348@cc.uow.edu.au (adil shaikh) writes...
>hiranya@leland.stanford.edu (Pratheep Balasingam) writes:
> 
> 
>>I recall that Gary Sobers, and Frank Heyes both managed to hit
>>six sixers in the same over off the same bowler : Malcolm Nash.
>>Is this correct, or am I imagining this? Please clarify. Also
>>I think Ravi Shastri too has hit six sixers in the same over
>>in a first-class match. Are there any other such instances? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>Ravi shashtri hit six sixers in Ranjit Trophy(First Class Match).
> 
> 
>I don't have any idea who was the bowler.
> 
> 
>Bye
>Adil
    Shastri hit six sixer in Ranji Trophy match against Baroda. Bowler was
    Tilakraj.

    -Rajesh
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Rajesh Singi                             rsingi@penuts.enet.dec.com        |
|  Digital Equipment Corp., Andover MA      (508)-474-3407                    |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: venkat@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (mu)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Bill O'Reilly dead
Date: 12 Oct 92 18:32:17 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

agrden@lure.latrobe.edu.au writes:
>I just saw a news report on the TV       The great leggie   Bill O'Reilly is
>dead    at 86     Bradman rated him the _best_ bowler of any type he ever
>faced.
>A sad day for cricket and for spinning!

Indeed!  R. Mohan who writes for *The Hindu* interviewed him, earlier this
year when India was playing Australia (prior to the WC).  The article 
mentioned that he had been ailing for some time.  

According to Mohan, he stormed into the pressbox and demanded to see an 
indian reporter.  Once located, he asked none too gently, where all the 
great indian spinners had gone to.  He inquired about L. Sivaramakrishnan 
who had made a favorable impression on him in an earlier tour.  He lamented 
the fact that with the large number of ODIs' being played, spin bowling, 
especially the wrist variety, was largely a dying art.

murari venkataraman
venkat@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: g9220348@cc.uow.edu.au (adil shaikh)
Subject: Re: Six sixers in the same over!
Organization: University Of Wollongong
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 07:07:36 GMT

hiranya@leland.stanford.edu (Pratheep Balasingam) writes:


>I recall that Gary Sobers, and Frank Heyes both managed to hit
>six sixers in the same over off the same bowler : Malcolm Nash.
>Is this correct, or am I imagining this? Please clarify. Also
>I think Ravi Shastri too has hit six sixers in the same over
>in a first-class match. Are there any other such instances? 




Ravi shashtri hit six sixers in Ranjit Trophy(First Class Match).


I don't have any idea who was the bowler.


Bye
Adil
From: pmc5@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Paul M Corballis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: "We are the world " Team of 80's
Date: 9 Oct 92 14:05:53 GMT
Reply-To: pmc5@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Paul M Corballis)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <92282.203228HH9679A@auvm.american.edu> Howard E. Hill-Esbrand <HH9679A@auvm.american.edu> writes:
>Spin can be negated by any No 11 batsman by simply padding the
---------------------------------------------------------------
>ball away. Notice the top teams in the world concentrate on the
----------
>Quick stuff e.g Pakistan (Akram,Waqar Younis,Aqib Javed and the
>recently retired Imran), West Indies(Bishop, Ambrose,Walsh,Patterson).

Interesting, though, isn't it how many of the World's great batsmen
seem to forget how to do that from time to time...

Cheers, Paul
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: s8921366@macgraw.mqcs.mq.oz.au (Paul English)
Subject: Re: Six sixers in the same over!
Organization: Macquarie University, School of Mathematics, Physics, Computing and Electronics
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 08:57:16 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.070736.26391@cc.uow.edu.au> g9220348@cc.uow.edu.au (adil shaikh) writes:
>hiranya@leland.stanford.edu (Pratheep Balasingam) writes:
>
>
>>I recall that Gary Sobers, and Frank Heyes both managed to hit
>>six sixers in the same over off the same bowler : Malcolm Nash.
>>Is this correct, or am I imagining this? Please clarify. Also
>>I think Ravi Shastri too has hit six sixers in the same over
>>in a first-class match. Are there any other such instances? 
>
>
>Ravi shashtri hit six sixers in Ranjit Trophy(First Class Match).
>
>
>I don't have any idea who was the bowler.
>

I remember one of the English spinners, possibly Phil Emburey (sp?) being
hit for six sixers in a tour game in India a few years back, but this may
not have been a first class match.  Anyone have any details?


--
    Paul English    |Email:                        |You can tell how far
   School of MPCE   |s8921366@mackay.mpce.mq.edu.au|we have to go when
Macquarie University|    paul@vulcan.anu.edu.au    |today's supercomputers
 Sydney, Australia  |                              |are programmed in FORTRAN
From: kaushik@dvorak.amd.com (Kaushik Chhotani)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Australian cricket season starts ......
Date: 15 Oct 92 14:10:05 GMT
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Austin, Texas

In article <1992Oct14.031854.8532@syd.dit.CSIRO.AU> kumar@syd.dit.CSIRO.AU (V.R.Kumar) writes:
>>
>>	just a reminder, in 1983 when india won the WC, it got a real
>>thrashing, I mean REAL THRASHING, at the hands of WI IN INDIA. I 
>>think WI won all the 5 or 6 ODs and also the test series without 
>>any loss. Now, that was embarassing......loosing at home.
>>	No body at that time suggested declaring india EX-Champs---
>>even tho india was never the favourite to win in the first place. 
>
>India was not a favourite to win the 1983 world cup. But it was
>not as lucky as Pakistan to win the world cup. Those who commented
>that India won the 1983 world cup by fluke, India proved it was not
>by winning the 1985 Mini World Cup by defeating all its opponents.

Well said, Ramkumar!!! In the 1983 World Cup, we beat the then World 
Cup holders twice and beat them soundly too. We beat the holders of the
World Cup tournament, England, too even though they had the home 
advantage :-) 

As far as I remember, we beat almost every team there was in the
World cup tournament. And as regards the Mini World Cup we proved
that we were still the World Champions in the true sense.

India could not have been declared ex-champs after the thrashing at
the hands of the WI, because we were supposed to win the Mini
World Cup in Oz. :-) :-)

BTW, why is it called the Mini World Cup? The only team that was missing
was Zimbabwe! I think that it should be called the "Elitist World Cup"
since all the major cricketing nations were there.


>I can agree that Pakistan is one of the best in one day cricket, but
>not the best in one day cricket.
>
>I wish Pakistan proves its power in one day cricket when it plays
>West Indies, Australia and South Africa this year.
>

True, I hope so, too. Pakistan has an awesome bowling lineup but their
batting is brittle. Need to beef up their batting lineup. They depend
too much on Malik and Miandad to carry them through.

>
>Cheers,
>
>Ramkumar

Kaushik
-- 
 _______ **** #include <std_disclaimer.h> ****         
 \____  |Advanced * KAUSHIK CHHOTANI              email: kaushik@dvorak.amd.com
 /|   | |Micro    * 5204 E.Ben White M/S 520, Austin TX 78741 * (512)462-6245(W)
| |___| |Devices  * 8420 Bangor Bend Austin TX 78758          * (512)339-4202(H)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: karnik@hecto.cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik)
Subject: Re: Some stats re the Indian team to tour SA/Zim
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 19:45:47 GMT

In <Bvz2Ls.LDy@cs.psu.edu> tripunit@algol.cs.psu.edu (Mahesh V Tripunitara) writes:

>>o  Test centuries: Azhar and Shastri have 11 each, Kaps has 7, and the two

>Are you sure Kapil Dev has 7 test hundreds ? I thought he had just 2...

	JUST TWO!!!! Of course not.... The Times of India mentioned seven, and
I guess that's quite probable.

>Mahesh.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  Neeran   Karnik  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dept. of Computer Science,      | Email: karnik@cs.umn.edu
University of Minnesota         |        karn0001@student.tc.umn.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: m0a1530@zeus.tamu.edu (ABBAS, MUSTAFA)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Neutrality (was Re: Australian cricket season starts ......)
Date: 13 Oct 92 16:45:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: zeus.13OCT199211455283
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Oct13.130053.6116@bas-a.bcc.ac.uk>, zcaccah@ucl.ac.uk (Mr Christopher Harrison) writes...
>m0a1530@zeus.tamu.edu (ABBAS, MUSTAFA) writes:
> 
>>In article <1992Oct11.223135.15086@syd.dit.CSIRO.AU>, kumar@syd.dit.CSIRO.AU (V.R.Kumar) writes...
> 
>OHHH! Do I spy a sly dig at umpires? When will the subject of 
>neutral umpires be laid to rest? Why is it when teams lose or have
>erroneous decisions go against them they complain about bias? Umpires
>stand out in the middle for approximately 6 hours every day (perhaps 
>longer with the over rates some teams go through), during those hours
>they will see some 6-800 deliveries. They must be on their toes for
>every one of them, and to only make a handful of mistakes in a summer,
>let only in just one day's play is remarkable enough. 
	
	Handful of mistakes!!!!!!!!!!! give us a break

	your comments reminds me excatly of what gavaskar and imran had 
said repeatedly about english media, that is, if english umpires make 
mistakes, it is considered human error and bla bla, but similar
mistakes by pakistani or indian umpires are considered acts of cheats. 
> 


>>	Anyways, I believe the present pakistan team is THEEE best among 
>>all and on a neutral soil with neutral umpires it can beat any team in 
>>a series of either Tests or ODs.I am not talking about a single match,
>>like the one played in a baseball dome.

> 
>What about the series defeat against England in the ODs? Or don't they 
>count because of the 'biased' umpires???
> 

	Well if you read closely at my comments, i am saying a series
in a neutral country with neutral umpires. 


>Also, don't forget the fact that in the league stage during the world
>cup England whipped Pakistan. It was only the fact that it rained that
>Pakistan shared the points and allowed them into the last four as a 
>result of that extra points. They won on the day of the final, but
>they did not dominate the tournament.
> 

	Are you forgetting how england themselves got into the finals.
did not the rain rule robbed SA a place in the finals. and did not england
loose to, who, ZIMBABWE. So the point is still that any team can beat any team
on aparticular day, but what counts is a series victory ON A 
NEUTRAL SOIL WITH NEUTRAL UMPIRES, and that is what happened in the WC.

> 
>Nobody is suggesting that Pakistan rescind their World Championship
>or declaring them Ex-World Champions. But it must be borne in mind
>that at this moment they are not the best, their are several teams
>that, on their respective days, can take anyone on and best them
>(neutral umpires on not).

	dont agree here, pak IS the best team, but do agree that any team
can beat any other on its day.	
> 
>				cheers.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: anurag@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu (Anurag Bist)
Subject: Re: Worst Aussie side since 1970
Bcc: anurag@wiliki
Organization: University of Hawaii
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 23:10:34 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.164130.18687@cs.yale.edu> papadopoulos-dimitrios@CS.YALE.EDU (Dimitrios Papadopoulos) writes:
>>>David Hookes (The Great White Hope)
>I always thought Hookes was a terrific bat who never batted to his potential.
>The two sixes he had off Andy Roberts after recovering from a broken jaw
>(after being hit by the same bowler)in 1977 {Packer circus}still stand
>out in my memory

 Also, not to forget, in the same series a brilliant short and sweet 
knock of 25 odd runs which contained 6 fours - four of them consecutive
off the bowling of Bob Willis (?) ...it was a match in which all the
Aussie batsmen were failing and Hookes came in and played an innings
which showed the potential. The match, in that Packer series,
was won by England and another guy of a similar temperament
from the English side - Dereck Randall - starred in that victory.

Infact, Hookes belonged to a class of batsmen which were always so near
and yet too far....their carefree attitude COULD HAVE
cost them their careers but at
the same time won the hearts of zillions of fans. I would put Randall,
Gower, Brijesh Patel (India)  and Brian Lara (in current times)  a few
of those falling in the same category.. 

Anurag
From: sma@waikato.ac.nz (Stephen Anderson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: "We are the world " Team of 80's
Date: 8 Oct 92 15:45:13 +1300
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

In article <92281.195206HH9679A@auvm.american.edu>, Howard E. Hill-Esbrand 
<HH9679A@auvm.american.edu> writes:
> How can any team play Qadir before Holding or Garner? They have more wickets
> less runs per wicket and less deliveries per wicket in fact they should play
> before Botham or Dev for the same statistics can be applied and Botham and Dev
> would come up lacking except for total wickets, but remember thru the 80's
> the West Indies bowlers had to share their wickets with Roberts,Marshall,
> Walsh,Patterson,Benjamin,Davis all of whom are very good bowlers. The other
> test playing countries had basically one man attacks except Pakistan who
> had Sarfraz then later Akram. Who partnered Hadlee ? Chatfield - not much of a
> bowler. Botham had Dilley then Thomas,Cowans,Fraser who are these chaps
> anyhow. And we all know that Kapil Dev opened India's attack from both ends.
Statistics proove very little.  For a start, with Qadir, he could be very
potent on a dryer wicket.  An all-pace attack can get very predictable, and
once batsmen have managed to settle in, you have no other weapon left to
dislodge them.  Also, the argument about bowlers at the other end doesn't hold
either.  The lack of bowlers at the other end is often cited as a reason why RJ
Hadlee is such a great bowler.  If you are a batsman against a team of one good
bowlers and a bunch of mediocre ones, you can block out against the good bowler
and try to attack the others.  But with good bowlers at both ends trying to do
that only digs you into a rut so you have to take risks against all bowlers. 
Note that Botham's greatest bowling success came with people like Willis and
Hendriks at the other end.
> 
> the team should be
> Gavaskar (should be grouped in 70's but too great to exclude)
> Greenidge
> Miandad
> Richards
> Border
> Gower  >Him again?  Why not Crowe, Vengsaker, Richardson...
> Imran > How about Qadir.  I'd much rather face Imran than Garner
> Dujon > That first slip that wears gloves again.  Try Smith or Kirmani
> Hadlee
> Marshall
> Garner
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: annadata@nada.ics.Hawaii.Edu (Anil Annadata)
Subject: sis sixers in an over
Organization: University of Hawaii
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 07:06:25 GMT


The two cricketers who hit six sixers in an over were
Ravi Shatri and Gary Sobers.
The unfortunate bowlers were Tilak Raj ( an unknown bowler in India)
and Malcom Nalsh.