HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Who owns CREATION?  (was re: Rumor has it...)
Date: 20 Aug 92 23:12:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Aug17.211020.19134@iplmail.orl.mmc.com>, steveg@iplmail.orl.mmc.com (Steve Gabrilowitz) writes...
>In article <Bsy5r8.14r@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey) writes:
>|> In article <1992Aug11.025120.18754@eskimo.celestial.com>, fate@eskimo.celestial.com (Craig Stykel) writes...
>|> >....that Creation Con is owned by Paramount Pictures...Is there anyone
>|> >out there that can verify the truth of this particular rumor floating
>|> >around?  I'd like to know how true the story is...
>|> 
>|>      Creation Conventions is owned by Adam Malin and Gary Berman.  Until
>                                                             ^^^^^^
> 
>Would he by any chance be any relation to Rick?

     Not by any chance.  No.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: singley@helix.nih.gov (Erick D. Singley)
Subject: Re: The Measure of a Man
Organization: (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD)
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 13:36:58 GMT

   Well, Data is a test of sorts.  Being one of a kind, and having been studied quite a bit before they 'set him loose' they grudged him the chance.  So far, he has done better than many humans (how many commedations/medals of 'highest honors?) though I'd bet many reseachers would still give their left arm to have him locked up forever to study him! 
  I missed the show, but I'd think a double standard is going on.  Either he is a member of star fleet, and therefor allowed to join the accademy and enjoy full benifits of the rights of a citizen (and so salvage rights don't even apply- if I was found in a spaceship, as a human, 'rescued' and given medical attention
to keep alive.  If I were later declared to be a citizen (or even put into the accedimy) SALVAGE rights wouldn't apply- though the government may wish for me to pay off some debt for the rescue.) OR he's property- salvage- by which he shouldn't be allowed to go a be an officer.  As was the opinion of the guy who said Data was a toaster.

>Computer systems are emerging that can be considered sentient.  And
>I wouldn't dream of giving them the same rights enjoyed by humans.
>So as I see it, sentience is not a sufficient prerequisite to receiving
>the rights of intelligent living beings.
-- 
>Danny Faught
The first is debatable.  They have computers where if you type questions, it'll give answers reasonable enough that you may have a difficult time knowing whether you are typing to a person, or a computer program.  But, sentient is a philosphy position that I'm not even going to try to start a thread on (I guess .phil dicussion)  But, legally? sentience-> rights? That's yet ANOTHER bad thread to start here! Quite a political one (someone had started a thread somewhere eariler- if Spock landed in front of th

e White house- what RIGHTS would he have, not being human?)

Oh well, Hope I don't flame. I'm kinda trying to get back in the swing of posting after five years.

:)  Erick
From: dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Stephen Dowling)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: FAQ
Date: 21 Aug 92 07:05:10 GMT
Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN.

Uh, sorry to have to ask ... what's the FAQ list, and where can I get a copy?
 
stephen dowling
dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: kenward@cs.sfu.ca (Kenward Chin)
Subject: Re: Season Premiere-- Geordi Dies!!!
Organization: CSS, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 22:33:39 GMT

In article <2311@unet.UUCP> jrs@zippy.unet.com (John Switzer Frame 3.0) writes:
>Jonathan Sheir (jxs52@po.CWRU.Edu) wrote:
>> I just recently found out from a reliable source that Geordi will be killed
>> in the premiere in an attempt to save Data's life.  LeVar Burton wished to
>> leave and the writers thought it would be a good way to send him off 
>
>No kidding. Let's see, Spock dies, regrets it and comes back. Tasha Yar
>dies, regrets it and comes back. Any bets on how Geordi will be resurrected?
>(assuming he dies in the first place, and I doubt Mr. Burton would be 
>so short-sighted. After all, if he wanted to leave, there are LOTS of ways
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>to explain his absence.)

Short-sighted?  Hm, maybe that's why he agreed to play a blind character!  B-)

Kenward Chin
-- 
Disclaimer: Since transmission of this article is by imperfect methods, there
	   may well be discrepancies between what is above and what was
	   intended.  Therefore, please edit this article to read as you wish.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: rohrernl@helix.nih.gov (Nathan Rohrer)
Subject: Re: Smithsonian
Organization: National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 15:54:07 GMT

In article <1992Aug19.050000.4039@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> npearl@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Nathan Y Pearlstein) writes:


>Does anyone know the exact date the exhibit ends?  I was planning to be in D.C.
>around Sept. 10th and i've been waiting a long time to see the exhibit.

I think they've extended the exhibit until January.

>-- 
>*  Nathan Pearlstein   npearl@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu     Astronomy -gasp!  *
>*  Sir Nathan Pearlstein     silly@camelot.uk.mil           Undergrad -GASP!! *
>* "...We eat ham and jam and spamalot..."  - Knights of The Round Table Choir *
>*        Beware lest the Slanneshi hordes pervert the Net    -- let them      *



/*********************************************************************/
/*                       --- Nathan Rohrer ---                       */
/*  NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE, OFFICE OF SCIENCE POLICY AND LEGISLATION */
/*              MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECTION               */
/* BITNET: NLR@NIHNEI31                  BETHESDA, MD 20892-0031     */
/* INTERNET: rohrernl@helix.nih.gov      NIH 3Com: NLR:NEI31:NIH     */
/* CompuServe: 70670,3164                PHONE: 301 496-2194         */
/*********************************************************************/
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: tankus@hsi.com (Ed Tankus)
Subject: Re: Gates' hair (Re: Crew Eccentricities)
Organization: 3M Health Information Systems, Wallingford CT
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 12:52:29 GMT

In article <7812@lee.SEAS.UCLA.EDU> linley@curtiss.seas.ucla.edu (Bruce Linley) writes:
>In article <BsM4Ho.DIL@acsu.buffalo.edu> v130qh57@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (sandra guzdek) writes:
>>...............s t u f f   d e l e t e d.................... and she [Gates]
>>also wants to be able to dress in minis and the such. she's sick of that damn 
>>lab coat....             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Please... Didn't we get enough of that in TOS?
>--



  But *WE* haven't gotten enough of *GATES* in these!!!




-- 
"For every word, there is a song upon which inspiration lies ...". 
- or:  "Leave the programming to others but give the hammer to me"
Ed Tankus.   {uunet,yale}!hsi!tankus -- OR -- tankus@hsi.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: carter@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Carter Bennett)
Subject: Re: The watch in Time's arrow
Summary: Yes, it HAS to be significant.
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 04:55:33 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <1992Aug12.173944.13053@unixg.ubc.ca> dkirkby@heart.ubc.ca (Don Kirkby) writes:
>I just downloaded a frame grab of the watch they found in the cave 
>under San Fran in Time's Arrow.  I think it says:
>
>To S.L.C.
>With Love
>30 November
>1889
>
>I believe that Mark Twain's full name was Samuel Longhorn Clemens, and
>Data was transported back to the 1890s.  

I can't verify "Longhorn" (you may well be correct), but I do know that Mr.
Clemens was fondly known as S.L.C. by at least one of his regular 
correspondents - a young lady he befriended.  The young lady (sorry I forget
the name) grew up and became a writer and her book, "Mark Twain and Me" is
worth reading.  It might also be a hint at something coming up.
>
>Whether this is significant or not is another story.
>
You can say THAT again!  :-)

Carter R. Bennett, Jr. - Scientist      No matter where you go...
carter@scilab.lonestar.org                 ...tty!
KI5SR
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ceg@bret.jpl.nasa.gov (Chuck Goodhart)
Subject: Re: The watch in Time's arrow
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Pasadena, CA
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 15:35:17 GMT

In article <92230.103622SMB128@psuvm.psu.edu> SMB128@psuvm.psu.edu
(stacey bronstein) writes:
>I think it is samuel LANGHORN clemens, rather than longhorn....
>                                           stace

Yes!!!

BTW, each time I saw LONGHORN go by, all I could think of was:
mooooooooooo!!!  :)

-- 
Chuck Goodhart, ceg@bret.jpl.nasa.gov
From: gmclain@lonestar.utsa.edu (Glenn A. Mclain)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Denise Crosby ( was Re: Women in Command (was Re: New TNG Char)
Date: 14 Aug 92 05:47:52 GMT
Organization: Univ of Texas at San Antonio

In article <1992Aug10.130456.19715@bnlux1.bnl.gov> schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:
>In article <Bsp3CG.4Az@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> news@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu writes:
>>
>>That may be true, but she's got the kind of tits that you could suck of for a day...
>>
>
>
>Well, _this_ certainly validates her talent, eh?

Speaking of which, did anyone see this week's episode of Red Shoe Diary on HBO?
Denise Crosby showed off those all day suckers and then some.
From: steveg@iplmail.orl.mmc.com (Steve Gabrilowitz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Who owns CREATION?  (was re: Rumor has it...)
Date: 17 Aug 92 21:10:20 GMT
Organization: Martin Marietta

In article <Bsy5r8.14r@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey) writes:
|> In article <1992Aug11.025120.18754@eskimo.celestial.com>, fate@eskimo.celestial.com (Craig Stykel) writes...
|> >....that Creation Con is owned by Paramount Pictures...Is there anyone
|> >out there that can verify the truth of this particular rumor floating
|> >around?  I'd like to know how true the story is...
|> 
|>      Creation Conventions is owned by Adam Malin and Gary Berman.  Until
                                                             ^^^^^^

Would he by chance be any relation to Rick?

-- 



I think
I think I am
Therefore I am!
I think...



                            Steve Gabrilowitz
                            Martin Marietta, Orlando Fl.
                            steve-gabrilowitz@orl.mmc.com
                            Fidonet 1:363/1701 (407-380-1701)
From: cegtitd@prism.gatech.EDU (Tim Dodd)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Season Premiere:  Geordi loses visor!  Uses a cane instead.
Date: 21 Aug 92 17:52:41 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

A reliable source has informed me that in the season premiere of
STAAAAR TREK, Geordi will drop his visor down into the warp coil,
and be reduced to incredibly primitive means of navigation.  Some
ridiculous excuse will be cooked up to explain why a new one couldn't
be replicated for him.

Tim
-- 
"It is still an unending source of surprise for me to see how a few
scribbles on a blackboard or on a sheet of paper could change the
course of human affairs."   -- Stanislaw Ulam
Tim Dodd, Research Scientist, Georgia Tech  cegtitd@prism.gatech.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: cubsfan@camelot.bradley.edu (Michael Silverman)
Subject: "Sanctuary" (new book)
Organization: Priests of the Temples of Syrinx
Date: 15 Aug 92 20:47:18 GMT

Short summary (no spoiler) : The BEST Star Trek book ever written.

Buy it. You won't be sorry.
 
--
cubsfan@camelot.bradley.edu

"One likes to believe in the freedom of baseball" - Geddy Lee
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: arnold@apollo.hp.com (Ken Arnold)
Subject: Re: Dolphins!
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 21:39:40 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Chelmsford, MA

In article <1992Aug18.145736.28316@dsd.es.com> bmadsen@dsd.es.com (Bruce Madsen) writes:
>There's a scene where one of the Ferengi rudely barges in on the Capt,
>the Ambassador (forget his name), and Geordi in the hallway. Picard
>manages to get the ambassador away (into a turbolift) and asks Geordi
>to take care of the Ferengi. Geordi then says to the Ferengi (more or
>less): "Have you seen the Dolphins? You gotta see the Dolphins". 

I wonder what happens when Riker yells "Evacuate decks 10 through 12"
or whatever.  Do the dolphins don antigrav devices and leave their
tanks to get to the safe areas?

		Ken
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu (Jeffrey S. Jo)
Subject: re: spoilers-- enough  Posting again
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 19:52:32 GMT




OK, this is last try I am going to attempt.  If this is readable, this
is try #3.  My last two postings didn't work.  As I have said twice before,
Enough is enough about ripping on Jonathen Sheir (though he is an idiot
for not putting *spoiler* in the title).  I am pretty PO'd myself, but I
say lets all wait and see.  If Geordi does die, we can rip on him some
more, if not, then we are no worse for wear.  He made a mistake, and he 
knows it, but let's wait and see.  I hope this gets posted.  Third times
a charm.  Have a nice day =)!!
					Jeffrey Jo






-- 
|Jeffrey S. Jo                  |		U.S.S. Enterprise              |
|Computer Operations		| Galaxy Class - Starfleet Registry NCC-1701-D |
|University of Nebraska at Omaha|        Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards, Mars     |
|tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu        |             Launched Stardate 40759.5        |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: lape@cs.utk.edu (Bryon S. Lape)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Problem with gifs....
Date: 13 Aug 92 20:48:25 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - Department of Computer Science
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra2e.cs.utk.edu
Originator: lape@hydra2e.cs.utk.edu

	WInGif barfs when reading the following two files from
vab02.larc.nasa.gov:

	sttng445.gif
	sttng454.gif
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your laundry phosphate free?  Help stop global pollution.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: snoopy@crchh426.BNR.CA (Antonio Tello)
Subject: Re: Season Premiere -- We get a great resolution to TIME's ARROW
Reply-To: snoopy@crchh426.BNR.CA (Antonio Tello)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 17:53:19 GMT

In article <ph3.714416627@unixg.ubc.ca>, ph3@unixg.ubc.ca (Michael
Hamilton (phys 306)) writes:
|>In <6066@npri6.npri.com> murphy@npri6.npri.com (David P. Murphy) writes:
|>
|>>come on, everybody play along!
|>>just make up a goofy idea for the new season (the more ludicrous, the
better)
|>>and forget about those silly spoiler warnings!
|>
|>>loads of fun!
|>
|>OK.
         
No Problem (the more ludicrous, the better)
From: ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Strong Women
Date: 16 Aug 92 11:07:47 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <1992Aug12.175600.1165@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> pcp2g@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Gilligan) writes:

>Tasha's *character* is excellent; the actor was bad. 

>Shelby
>The actor was good, too, and I would like to see her return.

>Ro
>The actor is a bit stiff, but that may wear off with time

OK, what's the deal????

Are women no longered referred to as *actress*????  Is this the newest
PC fad?  I can't believe it was a typo when you said actor referring
to a women three times in the same post.

What's going on?  Am I the last to know?


-- 
Jorge Diaz                       | Sign in a restaurant:
Georgia Institute of Technology  | 
Office of Information Technology |   "We reserve the right to serve refuse to
ccoprdj@prism.gatech.edu         |        anyone."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: raistlin@wixer.cactus.org (Eli Boaz)
Subject: Re: STIV and the transtator
Organization: Real/Time Communications
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 92 04:44:26 GMT

In article <1992Aug13.140244.28755@ctr.columbia.edu> Charles Laine <Charles_Laine@CCIS.BAYLOR.EDU> writes:
>
>In Star Trek IV, when Chekov attempts his escape from the "nuclear
>wessel", he leaves behind both his communicator and his phaser.  Now, if
>you remember in "A Piece of the Action" after McCoy leaves his
>communicator behind, Spock informs Bones of how damaging that could be. 
>The communicator contained something called a 'transtator', which Spock
>said was the key to much of the technology in the late 23rd century.
>
>Could it be that since this equipment was left behind in the 20th
>century, our military was able to obtain, analyze, redesign, and recreate
>the 'transtator' in the present time?  This would greatly alter the
>evolution of technology in the years following the whale-quest.  Perhaps
>the technology in the 23rd cetnury would not be quite as advanced if
>Chekov had not left his standard issues behind.   
>
>This is just a thought.  What do you think?

Well, I think the communicator and phaser left behind were of Klingon
design.  (I currently have ST:TVH rented, no I don't buy them, I have
better things to do with my money! 8-) So I will check them again...
Yeah, they look Klingon...)

ttyl,


-- 
Eli Boaz                      | Line noise provide by S.W. Bell Telephone!
raistlin@wixer.cactus.org     | "Anyone not wearing 2 million sunblock is
...!cactus.org!wixer!raistlin |  going to have a REAL BAD DAY, get it?" -T2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: picard's mistake
Date: 13 Aug 92 23:15:54 EST
Reply-To: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Canada Remote Systems

>someone else may have posted this before, since i can't recall thinking it
>up myself (so apologies if i'm plagarizing you), but didn't it seem
>suspicious that as soon as geordi told picard about wes's something-or-another
>valve being open before the accident, picard knew right away what wes and
>the rest of the flight team had been up to?  doesn't it sound as though
>picard is REALLY familiar with that particular outlawed manuever?

Nah, I don't think so.  The example he gave of the last incident of the
Colbert Starburst (SP?) maneuver being done he indicated that all 5 of
the pilots died.  I suspected it was just common knowledge back then.
Of course, he COULD be lying...


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jason Wong
Calling from Markham, Ontario CANADA.  It's not cold though!  :-)
INTERNET: bernie.wong@canrem.com
---
  OLX 2.1 TD  ...for the death of my boy.  Kirk
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario/Detroit, MI
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: steve@sep.Stanford.EDU (Steve Cole)
Subject: Season Premiere -- Alexander saves the ship
Organization: Stanford Exploration Project
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 23:42:31 GMT

That would make for a few outbursts on this group.
Of course it could happen - nearly everyone else is back
in the 19th century right now - but it better not.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Cole  (steve@sep.stanford.edu, apple!sep!steve)
Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
From: zerobeat@intacc.uucp (Ferenc Szabo)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: the "darkness" of DS9 (was: Re: TREKIES)
Date: 12 Aug 92 07:53:56 GMT
Organization: Inter/Access' Matrix BBS

>>In article <55525@olivea.atc.olivetti.com>, jan@oas.olivetti.com writes...
>>>( I hope that the darker tone of the sets for the new series will not 
>>>translate into more grossities a la Batman, or the later Indiana Jones 
>>>films, etc.  A touch of that, like in Star Wars, is fine, but if overdone it
>>>turns off most girls and women and parents I know, unless it's so

Somebody reading the above paragraph over my shoulder remarked that it
just set the women's movement back 50 years.  She said it......not me.

Be that as it may, If you place Batman and I. Jones in the grossly dark
category, and Star Wars in the dark but watchable category, then I
have to tell you that Star Wars is considered kiddie stuff in the 
world of darkness.

This is not a flame of your timidness and/or shelteredness and/or
taste, but rather an observation and statement.  If Star Trek
got only as dark as Star Wars (thank dog it's been darker) then
I doubt that the kind of message flow on ras* would be as it is.
Philisophical threads would be far and few between.  Heated
discussion would no doubt be a lot lower (not that every one of
these stems from 'dark' elements).

I would LOVE a Star Trek where the darkness level of episodes like
"The Mind's Eye", "Best Of Both Worlds", "Yesterday's Enterprise",
"Conspiracy", "Sins Of The Father" etc are considered the norm.

I would also LOVE a Star Trek where the humor in "Deja Q" is 
considered the norm for when humor is called for.

In general, a more INTENSE Star Trek. Less Namby Pambyism.
Less Family Ties.  Less Who's The Boss.  You know what I mean....

ferenc
From: jarnis@mits.mdata.fi (Jarno Kokko)
Subject: Re: What is the 25th Anniversary game?
Keywords: version, romulan, cloak
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 12:48:32 GMT

In article <1992Aug21.000452.26548@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> bdugan@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Bill Dugan) writes:
>In article <1992Aug20.123718.26029@mits.mdata.fi> jarnis@mits.mdata.fi (Jarno Kokko) writes:
>>So you work for Interplay? Well, do you have ANY information about
>>any kind of 'extra missions' or a followup to this GREAT game?
>>
>
>Well, look for the first new Interplay star trek game to be the CD-ROM version
>of Star Trek: 25th Anniversary.  This will include lots of incredible voice
>and sound, and the Vengeance scenario is being extended.  After that, who
>knows?
>
>bill
>interplay
>
>PS: Glad you enjoyed our game.
>-- 
>Bill Dugan
>bdugan@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Shit. This means that I would have to buy a CD ROM drive... what a shame.
Anyway, I *REALLY* hope that there would be some kind of follow-up/extra
missions disk for this game. It really cries for one. It was too
short for a REAL trekkie (well, I think after seeing all the 79(?) episodes
of old trek that it was too short... MORE MORE... :)

If you are going to release anything like this, I will be the first
one to purchase one.

   ____________
 _| .signature |______________________________________________________
|                                                                     |
|  -------- Jarno Kokko --------  |  Borg: Prepare to be assimilated  |
|   --- jarnis@mits.mdata.fi --   |        by the Borg.               |
|    ---- Vantaa, Finland ----    |  Worf: Prepare to eat phasers.    |
|_____________________________________________________________________|


From: moursund@hpcvnb.CV.HP.COM (David_Moursund)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 92 15:41:01 PDT
Subject: Re: Data's Brain again (was Re: The watch in Time's arrow)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, Oregon
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current

>/ hpcvnb:rec.arts.startrek.current / judson@watnxt2.ucr.edu (Michael Judson) /  4:44 pm  Aug 17, 1992 /
>In article <92230.103622SMB128@psuvm.psu.edu> SMB128@psuvm.psu.edu (stacey  
>bronstein) writes:
>> I think it is samuel LANGHORN clemens, rather than longhorn....
>>                                            stace
>hmmm, is that right?  I had thought that it was Longhorn, but I do not
>know for certain.  Does anyone know for certain?

According to my American Heretic Dictionary, it is _Langhorne_.

dm
From: eaeu198@orion.oac.uci.edu (Guess)
Subject: Fake Spoiler
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 21 Aug 92 18:21:34 GMT
Distribution: usa

Picard orders every women to wear mini-skirt like they wore
on TOS!!