HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: w0s7835@tamsun.tamu.edu (Won Sohn)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Question about Precision Fidelity C-9 Preamplifier
Date: 6 Jan 1993 14:42:48 -0600
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
  (5.65b/IDA-1.4.3 for rec-audio-high-end@uunet.uu.net); Wed, 6 Jan 93 14:42:50 -0600
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Summary: Preamplifier
Keywords: preamp, PF C-9
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

I mailed this article to rec.audio, but I have not gotten any response.
If anyone know or have this preamp, please e-mail to me.

Is there anyone who knows about PRECISION FIDELITY C9 preamplifier?

My knowledge:
	1. about 10 years old.
	2. hybrid with 12 tubes and FETs.
	3. Better sound than Audio Research SP-6B preamp with my system.

I am particularly interested in its price, quality, and reliability.

I have circuit diagrams but no mannual about the preamp.
If anybody have the mannual, please make me copy your manual.

I will appreciate any comment or suggestions about my question.

Thanks.
Won Sohn

	My e-mail address:sohn@ee.tamu.edu
From: qchorn@mtu.edu (Horn)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: INFO WANTED: JBL-L200 "Studio Master" 2-way speaker system
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 22:07:52 GMT
Organization: Michigan Technological University
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

I have recently inherited a pair of JBL-L200 Studio Master speakers.
Although they are almost 20 years old, they still sound great with the
exception that the high-end is a bit over emphasized.  I have been told
that JBL used to sell a kit that converted the 2-way L200's to 3-way
L300's and that this improved the high end dramatically.  Does anyone
know if this kit is worth searching for and if it is, where would I
look for it?


Thanks for your help,

Quinn C. Horn Michigan Technological University
From: ashley@trident.datasys.swri.edu (Ashley Gorakhpurwalla)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Sp show experiences
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 93 16:43:44 CST
Organization: Southwest Research Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu


Is there anyone out there who has attended a previous Stereophile "show"
and willing to share their experiences.  This year's show is in the March
time frame in San Franscico.  Is it worthwhile  for the average high-end
hobbyist/consumer?  What is the format ( one large convention hall, many
small rooms ... ) ?  Any advice for those interested in attending?

Thanks in advance.

-ash
ashley@trident.datasys.swri.edu
From: Andy Kurtz <ak35+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Sumiko turntable
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 16:53:57 -0500 (EST)
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Cc: 
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

Any opinions Sumiko's turntable?  I just listened to one at a shop
(through Thiel 1.2s) and was pretty impressed (especially when I was
told it was 350 bucks).  When put alongside of one of the lesser Linn's
(can't remember which one), the sound was almost indistinguishable
(could've been any number of factors, though).  

Since there is only one shop in Pittsburgh that takes turntables
seriously (and since they only carry Sumiko and Linn turntables), my
listening/shopping options are fairly limited.  I know there are a
number of good turntables in my price range (to, say, 550 (600?) bucks)
but I just can't listen to any.  I'd really appreciate any advice/input
y'all have on this (i.e. what do you own and are you happy with it??).
Mailorder may then become an option.

cheers, andy
From: spaaejg@ucl.ac.uk (Eric Glover)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Transformer types and power supplies
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 93 16:53:52 +0000
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Via: uk.ac.bcc.mail-a; Wed, 6 Jan 1993 16:53:59 +0000
          id <19858-0@mail-a.bcc.ac.uk>; Wed, 6 Jan 1993 16:53:53 +0000
          Wed, 6 Jan 1993 16:53:52 GMT
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu



I am planning to build to build my own valve power amplifier for domestic hi-fi use, and I am reasonably happy with the circuit details, but I have a few
questions concerning transformers. I would be grateful for any informed advice,
either by email or on the net.

I intend to use a bridge rectifer circuit (for the PS) followed by a capacitor
to earth, followed by a choke, followed by another capacitor (most of the old
books I've seen illustrate this type). But I have also seen designs where the
choke precedes the capacitor. Which is best? (I realise that there is a voltage
difference -- 1.414 vs. 0.62.)

Large inductance chokes seems hard to get (at least in the UK), so I plan
to use the primary of a mains toroidal transformer. On my cheap LCR meter
this measures around 50H. Is there any way I can estimate how much this will
drop in actual use (say @100mA, 100Hz)?

At the moment I don't want to pay for a custom made output transformer (maybe I
will if the amplifier actually works!) so I want to wind my own. I think I
know how to do this, but I'm wondering if I should use an EI (UT) core type or a
toroidal. Can anyone briefly outline the merits and demerits of the two types?

I am puzzled by these two designs because according to my understanding of
electromagnetic theory, toroidal cores offer much higher inductances than
the EI types. Now, this has been known for a century or so, so why are most
transformers on classic and modern valve amps of the EI type?


Eric Glover, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK (spaaejg@ucl.ac.uk)
From: weems@cs.umass.edu (CHIP WEEMS)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Re: 78 stylus enquiry
Date: 6 Jan 93 19:26:00 GMT
Organization: University of Massachusetts CS Department
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu


In article <1iens6INN5e2@uwm.edu>, peterca@ento.csiro.au writes...
>I have a friend who has a good hifi system (Goldmund TT,SME V arm, SP8
>preamp etc).  He also has played me some 78s via an old radiogram patched
>into his system and I was very impressed with sound quality which he got
>out.  He has recently purchased a secondhand Lenco turntable which does 78
>and appears well built.  What he would like to know is: what modern, high
>quality cartridges do people recommend for 78s?  He wondered about a moving
>coil custom fitted with a larger diamond but I thought that a good moving
>magnet would allow stylus swaps for different groove widths.  Any ideas? 
>He has quite a few 78s in very good condition.  Also he is prepared to use
>a good modern arm on the turntable and again is interested in
>recommendations and any other advice.  I will pass on the info.  Thanks.  
> 

I also have an old Lenco that I use for playing 78s. In that application
I have an old Stanton 681EEE cartridge with a stylus that was available
as an option at the time, which was designed for playing 78s. I don't
know if these are still available new, but it works well for me.

What I'd really like to find is something that can play Edison 78s.
I have about 50 of these that I picked up at a rummage sale, and I
haven't found anything to play them short of getting an antique Edison
player. (Background: Edison 78s have the undulations in the bottoms of
the grooves instead of the sides -- i.e. they vary in depth.)

Chip
From: whiting@europa.eng.gtefsd.com (claude whiting)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: BRYSTON
Date: 8 Jan 1993 06:53:10 -0600
Organization: GTE Federal Systems
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu


I took a look at a Bryston 120wpc amp and a pre-amp yesterday and was 
impressed by the build quality and sound. What really impressed me however 
was the warranty. Twenty years labor ,parts, and shipping one way!!!

Does anyone own Bryston equipment? What are your opinions? 

Claude
From: bk781@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Scott Boesken)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: FOR SALE: Dynaco ST70 & PAT 4
Date: 7 Jan 1993 08:15:47 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu



For Sale: Dynaco ST70 & PAT 4.
The ST70 is a tube power amp rated at 35 watts per channel into 8 ohms.
Has 4- 8- 16 ohm speaker taps.
Intermodulation Distortion at 35 watts (normally about .5%)
comes with assembly / operation manual.

The PAT 4 is a transistorized pre amp that will compliment the ST70.
The PAT 4 has the usual input/ output jacks.  Tape, tuner, phono, spare etc.
It also has 4 A.C. outlets to power other equipment.

Both units are in very good- ready to go condition.
  $300.00 dollars includes shipping, or best offer!
  Scott Boesken/ home ph. 216-779-9626 or E-Mail.
From: "Peter Chong" <CHONGHGP@SGPVM1.VNET.IBM.COM>
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Carmina Burana - again!
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 13:59:22 SGP
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
   Mon, 11 Jan 93 01:41:47 EST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

Couple of weeks ago, I posted my opinion on which version of Orff's
exposition is most representative of good sound and performance. I
recommended the Previn version, and said that I would post the CD and
LP number if there were interested parties. I was pleasantly surprised
to find 8 such requests. So here it goes:

Work: Carmina Burana
Composer: Carl Orff
Conductor: Andre Previn
Label: EMI CDC 7 4711-2 on CD
       and HMV ASD-3117 on LP

Good luck!
Pete
From: mikero@microsoft.com (Michael Robin)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Re: Linaeum Speakers
Date: 30 Dec 92 23:49:16 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

>
>Iticle <1hn1d0INNih3@uwm.edu> randy@unix.ecs.rpi.edu (Randall Bradley) writes:
>Linaeum speakers and still "hear highs." 
>
>happen in an anechoic environment. 
>
>different "reviewers." 

I mentioned the dispersion on the vertical axis. Eg, dynamic cones 
are round in both directions, planars are flat, and the Linaeum
cylinder drivers are "round" horizontally.  Imagine standing on a
ladder about 7ft high - above a Martin Logan curved diaphram - you'd
get the same effect, but it's much easier to acheive w/the small
driver - all that is required is to stand up. I just mentioned that
this tiny vertical sweet-spot bothered me, but it's no big deal if
you sit in a chair dedicated to listening to them.
From: weems@cs.umass.edu (CHIP WEEMS)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Re: Linaeum Speakers
Date: 4 Jan 93 20:45:00 GMT
Organization: University of Massachusetts CS Department
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu


The description of the narrow vertical dispersion of the Lineum driver
reminds me of the Clements Monitor leaf driver. If you catch it at
just the right point in its limited vertical dispersion pattern, it
sounds wonderful. But that sweet spot is so narrow that people who
differ in height by more than about a foot can hear a substantially
different presentation. I found that just sitting up straight, vs.
slouching would affect the sound. However, my few experiences with it
were in a space that only allowed me to get about 8 to 10 feet back
from the speakers. Are the Lineums as sensitive as that? Or are they
more forgiving?

Chip
From: peterca@ento.csiro.au
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: 78 stylus enquiry
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 15:57:30 EST
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

I have a friend who has a good hifi system (Goldmund TT,SME V arm, SP8
preamp etc).  He also has played me some 78s via an old radiogram patched
into his system and I was very impressed with sound quality which he got
out.  He has recently purchased a secondhand Lenco turntable which does 78
and appears well built.  What he would like to know is: what modern, high
quality cartridges do people recommend for 78s?  He wondered about a moving
coil custom fitted with a larger diamond but I thought that a good moving
magnet would allow stylus swaps for different groove widths.  Any ideas? 
He has quite a few 78s in very good condition.  Also he is prepared to use
a good modern arm on the turntable and again is interested in
recommendations and any other advice.  I will pass on the info.  Thanks.  

----------------------------------------
Peter Campbell
C/O Div. Entomology, C.S.I.R.O.
Box 1700 Canberra A.C.T. 2601
Australia  (peterca@ento.csiro.au)
Ph.61-6-2464158 (w), 61-6-2516213 (h),
61-6-2464173 (fax)
----------------------------------------
From: fleet@skcla.monsanto.com (Geoff, 1825/A-1E x8221)
        FLEET@tin.monsanto.com
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Kits
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 13:40:18 -0600
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

Has anyone got any thoughts/experiences to share on the building of
kits?  Are there any out there which are particularly spectacular?  Anything
in Amateur Audio?  (Anyone know how to subscribe to Amateur Audio?)

I'm particularly interested in phono preamp kits -- I'm considering
building the kit from Welborne Labs which comprises: dual power supply,
dual PS regulator, hybrid phono stage and hybrid line stage.  I want to end
up with a preamp as state-of-the-art as possible.  I'm thinking of substituting
all the audiophile-approved goodies like Caddock resistors, MIT caps, RAM tubes,
Kimber hookup wire, etc.

A few questions -
How much better is a ladder stepped attenuator than a conductive plastic volume
pot?  Which pots are best?
Any thoughts on hookup wire?  Is is worth getting Kimber KCAG at $15/foot?
Is physical layout inside the box (e.g. placement of circuit boards, dressing 
of wires, etc.) important?  (The Welborne kit has the PS in a separate box).
Any other ideas - without getting too deeply into electronics or circuit mods.
I just want to build a kit, plug it in and have it work!

Any comments appreciated.
Geoff Fleet
From: awelker@watarts.uwaterloo.ca (a welker)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Re: D/A: upgrade advice
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 17:48:03 GMT
Organization: University of Waterloo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

In article <1ic5e9INNmpj@uwm.edu> europe@europe.corp.sgi.com (Patrick Renvoise) writes:
>Dear Audiophiles,
>Let me ask you if you have any comments on upgrading my system:
>-Marantz CD65II transport >-Audio Alchemy DDE D/A
>-Conrad & Johnson PV 8 preamp >-Conrad & Johnson MV52 amp
>-Dahlquist DQ20i speakers >-Straight Wire Maestro interconnects
>-Kimber 8TC cables
>I believe that my system would benefit a new D/A like the new PS Audio Digital Link $500 (the Ultra link at $2000 is over my budget), or the Sumo theorem ($700).
>Any ideas or experiences you would share in that field?

I would take a look at the Museatex Melior D/A converter. It is a bitstream    
unit with a special anti-jitter circuit called C-Lock that will help with your
transport. I just bought one after comparisons with the PS audio, the Sumo,
the Micromega Duo BS and the EAD. For the price (around $900) it has an
excellent soundstage presentation and dramatically cleaned up the high-end 
compared to my Onkyo GX-10 Integra which I now use as a transport.

Andrew Welker
From: wfarring@mtholyoke.edu (Bill Farrington)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Re: FOR SALE: Heathkit Audio Equip
Date: 7 Jan 1993 13:28:47 -0500
Organization: Mount Holyoke College
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu



The amp and surround sound decoder have been sold.

Sorry.
From: pohsk@ecst.csuchico.edu (Lee Kuan Yew)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Rotel & Merdian CDP
Date: 3 Jan 1993 09:25:21 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for rec-audio-high-end@uunet.uu.net); Sun, 3 Jan 1993 01:25:22 -0800
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

Hi fellow audiophiles, 

Is there any significant different in sound quality between the 
Rotel RCD965BX and the Meridian 200/203 CD players?  Is it worth
paying $1000 more for the Meridian 200/203?
From: jim.grey@acd4.acd.com   (jwg@acd4.acd.com)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Re: 78 stylus enquiry
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 15:10:23 GMT
Organization: /u/jwg/.organization
	(queueing-rmail) id 120641.18169; Fri, 8 Jan 1993 12:06:41 EST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

In article <1ihfbaINNhmh@uwm.edu> bp816@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Stuart Krivis) writes:


   Many of the Grado cartridges are available with styli for 78 rpm
   records. I have found Grado products to be quite competent and an
   excellent value-for-money.

   Lyle Cartridges:
   P.O. Box 158
   Valley Stream, New York 11582
   USA

   has a good selection of cartridges and styli of all types and
   brands. I have been very happy with their service.

I have a stack of 78s at home, and have always resigned myself to playing
them on my old Radio Shack all-in-one system to avoid damage to my real
system.  The platters are scratchy, noisy, heavy... I'd imagine that the
noise inherent in playing them would not be great on the old speakers.  And
I'd imagine that I'd need a whole separate *cartridge* to play them so the
cartridge I use on my Lps doesn't get beat to heck.

Am I right or wrong?  Is it generally safe for your equipment to play 78s?

jim grey
jwg@acd4.acd.com
From: mohan@yoko.rutgers.edu (sunil Mohan)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: CJ PV8, Melos 111 opinions sought
Date: 31 Dec 92 08:18:54 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu



As mentioned in a previous posting, I am in the market for a PreAmp. I
stand to pick up a Conrad-Johnson PV8 for under $1000. The Melos 111B
is also available at about $1395. I listened to the CJ at home and
liked its sound stage and dynamics a lot, and its tubey sound
compensates for the leaner sound of the rest of my system. I got to
listen to the Melos 111 at a store in a completely different system,
so cant make a comparison. So, any opinions on the two preamps will be
welcome. 

BTW, The CJ manual recommends a complete tube change after 2-3 years
as they degrade sonically ... Does anyone have any experience with
this phenomenon? ... I have never owned a tube amp.

My system:
	Sony CDP-970 CD Player
	Hafler XL-280 Power Amp
	Thiel CS 3.5 speakers

_
Sunil
From: stuartz@sco.COM (Stuart Zimny)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Cal Audio Delta Drive
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 16:36:57 GMT
Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Keywords: cd drive delta
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu



Does anyone own or have experience with the Cal Audio Delta Drive
transport.

It appears to be the first reasonably priced ($800) transport out
there and I am considering mating it with my Theta Pro Basic II.  At
first glance, the unit appears to be a bit flimsy (especially the
drawer mechanism), but I am interested in hearing from any owners
and/or auditioners out there who have used the thing.

Thanks!



-- 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Stuart Zimny
Internet: stuartz@sco.COM                             SCO Technical Staff 
UUCP    : ...!{uunet}!sco!stuartz            

"The Lord gives me grace and the Devil gives me style"
                                   -Gambel Rogers
From: europe@europe.corp.sgi.com (Patrick Renvoise)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Re: upgrade advice?
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 19:28:45 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Distribution: rec
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

Kenwood and Sony don't make any equipment (that I know of) that are
worth listening to ---hope I didn't offend any body---.  Just as a
remark, about 3 months ago I bought (with a one week free home trial
period) the Sony CDR1 transport. At $4000 list price you can expect to
get decent sound out of this unit: not at all, the sound didn't compare
with my current $500 Marantz CD used as a transport. The highs were
etchy , the definition was a little better but there was too much
detail making the sound agressive. So I returned the Sony although I
had a good deal on it at $800 for this new unit.

My experience is that it's better to go for a non mainstream volume
manufacturer, but instead a well recognized mid to high end
manufacturer will give you better sound for the money.  I would replace
the Bose by a pair of Signet or Spica  or Paradim or Definitive Tech
or... just read last edition of Stereophile.  I would also change the
Kenwood stuff for some Adcom or Rotel preamp and amp.  The difference
of price should be minimal but the difference of sound will be major.
Also I personnaly don't like Carver (except their speakers) I found
that you can get better sound for less money (e.g: Adcom, Nad or any
others mid-fi vendor).

DON"T LET THE BIG VENDORS SELL YOU THEIR MARKETING CRAP, LISTEN FOR
YOURSELF AND TRUST YOUR EARS. There are major differences between
systems.

PS: Try tubes sometimes, it's more $$$ but it's great...
From: Hallick_Lab@tikal.biosci.arizona.edu (Hallick Lab)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: subscription and Questions
Date: 11 Jan 1993 11:08:13 -0700 (MST)
Organization: University of Arizona
 <01GTE1SQVGG08YAHEA@Arizona.edu>; Mon, 11 Jan 1993 10:54:59 MST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

                       Subject:                               Time:9:50 AM
  OFFICE MEMO          subscription and Questions             Date:1/11/93
Hi-my name is mitch favreau at  HALLICKLAB@TIKAL.BIOSCI.ARIZONA.EDU.
I have two questions.  I want to build a small, non-self powered
subwoofer/satellite system along the lines of the polk 3000 (ie, woofer
under 56 l  and sats around 3 l in vol).  The list of Speaker Builder back
issues lists several articles on this, but at $25 per year of back issues
I would like to know which year has a design I can use.  Any recommendations
would be greatly appreciated.  I have been thinking of a 10" dual voice coil
woofer from Madisound in a 42 l reflex enclosure (poss. down-firing).  How
much power does this need?
  The second question is somewhat related.  I have a Harmon/Kardon 930A
twin-power reciever from 1972 (you can tell how high-end I am by that) and
was just given a Heath AR-15 reciever (transistor type but with a MASSIVE
transformer and capacitor) what are the RMS power ratings of these ?  which
should I keep  ?  Does anyone know anything about the Heath unit (ie,
owner/builder manual or schematic)?
Thanks for reading this, again I apologise if this posting was
innappropriate.  Mitch
From: caadalin@mtu.edu (mIgh'wI)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: upgrade advice?
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 17:21:28 GMT
Organization: Michigan Technological University
Distribution: rec
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

I am thinking about upgrading my system. I currently have the following
Kenwood components: KR-V9010, DP-M6010, KX-W8010;
with Bose 10.2 series 1 speakers. There's lots of goodies I'd _like_ to get,
but I was planning on getting rid of the reciever and getting a Carver
TFM-35 and a Sony TA-E2000ESD. I figured I'd live without a tuner for awhile.
Any comments? Is this a worthwhile upgrade?

			-Chris Adaline
			 caadalin@mtu.edu
From: rigg@ssdt-tempe.sps.mot.com (Dana Rigg)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: BMG Phone Number
Date: 4 Jan 93 20:18:56 GMT
Organization: Motorola, Inc.
Reply-To: rigg@ssdt-tempe.sps.mot.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu


Hi all!

I can no longer get through to BMG using the 1-800-WAMADEUS phone number.
Does anyone know if there is a new one?  Please email responses.

Thanks!

Dana Rigg
rigg@ssdt-tempe.sps.mot.com