HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: koft@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Dan Koft)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: DS9: Avery Brooks has attitude.
Date: 11 Jan 93 18:36:57 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

Let me get out my Rutgers University directory, ...... here we are:

Brooks, Avery Franklin
  Associate Professor of Theater Arts at the Mason Gross School of Arts (a
  division of R. U.)

I have seen him perform on stage twice, once as Paul Robeson, and once as
Othello.  In both performances he was VERY powerful and magnetic, far and
away better than his Hawk character (which I liked very much).  I haven't
seen DS9 yet but I AM looking forward to see him in action.

		Dan

Dan Koft, Hill 133, Busch Campus       dot dot dot: koft@gandalf.rutgers.edu
Rutgers University, Computing Services  bang  bang: {any}!rutgers!gandalf!koft
Piscataway, NJ  08855                   ring  ring: (908) 932-3216
-- 
Dan Koft, Hill 133, Busch Campus       dot dot dot: koft@gandalf.rutgers.edu
Rutgers University, Computing Services  bang  bang: {any}!rutgers!gandalf!koft
Piscataway, NJ  08855                   ring  ring: (908) 932-3216
From: scott.hollifield@the-matrix.com (Scott Hollifield) 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Highlights from Conventio
Date: 11 Jan 93 23:18:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The MATRIX BBS - Birmingham, AL - 205-323-2016
Reply-To: scott.hollifield@the-matrix.com (Scott Hollifield) 

BN>    - The woman who re-voiced the four-handed piano player in
BN>      "Unification II" is the same actress who does the voice of the
BN>      computer in Deep Space Nine.

This is curious information.  According to the credits, Judi Durand is
the woman who provides DS9's voice, not Harriet Leider (credited as
Amarie, the keyboardist in "Unification II").

              /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
              \  "Let us think the unthinkable, let us   /   scott.hollifield
              /   do the undoable.  Let us prepare to    \   @the-matrix.com
              \  grapple with the ineffable itself, and  /
              /    see if we may not eff it after all."  \
              \_              --- Dirk Gently           _/
                \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

                                                                                     
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: jwells@netcom.com (Court Jester)
Subject: Re: DS9 was very very BAD :(
Keywords: bad
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 06:10:03 GMT

noah@cad.gatech.edu (Noah White) writes:

>    I saw the DS9 premier yesterday and to make a long story short, it sucked. It
>was riddled with incosistancies and contardiction. For instance when Commander Sisko
>is captured by the aliens they threaten to kill him, yet later on the aliens say they
>have no comprension of death. Also if these aliens are in a non-linear dimension (in
>terms of time) it would be impossible for them to coexist with a creature from a linear
>time dimension. It would be sort of like us being able to see a _true_ 2 dimentional
>object. There are no such things as all matter as we know it exists in 3 dimensions.
>The only part I did like was the beginning battle scenes, the rest was trash and so was
>the acting.

Fine. Don't watch it.

While the rest of us watch DS9, you can work on getting a decent editor.
-- 
     || (||)  The Court Jester               "Citizens of the planet
     ||       From the House of Xon   \    /  Earth...  We bring you
  () || ()    Long live The Leader!    \  /   greetings, and we come
     ||                                 \/    in peace."
(||) ||       jwells@netcom.netcom.com       "Resist.... or perish!"
From: wolfone@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Patrick Chester)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Transporting thru shields?
Date: 9 Jan 93 20:04:24 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

In article <1993Jan7.214608.1@vax1.mankato.msus.edu> kens@vax1.mankato.msus.edu writes:
]In article <2121.2b461aad@mbcl.rutgers.edu>, wilson@mbcl.rutgers.edu writes:
]> 
]> 	It has been my impression that transporters cannor be
]> utilized thru shieds.  
]> 	The repoeat epidosde where Scotte returns prompts this 
]> question/comment.  The ship Geordi and Scottie are on 
]> cleary has the shields up - but are transported off the 
]> Gelico. But I remember that shields were lowered to
]> transport the admiral-spy to a Romulan vessel - a bad time to do it
]> if you don't have to.
]
]YEAH, I ALWAYS THOUGHT THAT THEY HAD TO LOWER THE SHIELDS BEFORE USING THE
]TRANSPORTER.  IN FACT, I CAN REMEMBER A FEW EPISODES THAT THEY WERE UNABLE TO
]TRANSPORT SOMEONE BECAUSE THE SHIELDS WERE INTERFEREING WITH THE SIGNAL.
]YOU WOULD THINK THAT WITH THEM BEING SO "ADVANCED", THAT THEY COULD HAVE COME
]UP WITH A SYSTEM THAT WOULD WORK THROUGH THE SHIELDS.

<ahem>

WELL BUDDY, MAYBE THEY *DID* DEVELOP A WAY TO TRANSPORT THROUGH SHIELDS USING
THEIR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY. THEN MAYBE SOMEONE USED THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
AVAILABLE TO DEVELOP A NEW SHIELD GENERATOR THAT THE NEW TRANSPORTER SYSTEM
COULDN'T GET THROUGH. IF YOU WANT A MODERN-DAY EQUIVALENT, WHY DON'T YOU
ASK YOURSELF WHY CURRENT MISSILE TECHNOLOGY HASN'T MADE AIRCRAFT OBSOLETE
LIKE THEY SAID MISSILES WOULD DO IN THE 50'S. 


By the way, REMEMBER TO SHUT OFF THE 'CAPS LOCK' BUTTON NEXT TIME, okay?



-- 
Patrick Chester           |---------------------------------------------------| 
Politically Incorrect     |"The earth is too fragile a basket in which to keep|
Future Lunar Colonist     |  all your eggs." Robert A. Heinlein               |
Another Damn Exception    |"The meek can *have* the Earth. The rest of us are |
claypigeon                |  going to the stars." Robert A. Heinlein          |
Many other stupid titles  |---------------------------------------------------|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
Subject: Re: Kira - ick
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:37:08 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1is6p0INN5r@shelley.u.washington.edu> gwangung@carson.u.washington.edu (just another theatre geek) writes:

>>Even incredibly passionate freedom fighters have ways of showing
>>those passions besides screaming at the top of their lungs (when
>>played by competent actresses.)

>	Which Nan Visitor is.

>	At least, none of the pros I work with have a problem with her.

I've hear the "pros" in Hollywood have a drug problem. :-)

If she showed up in my theater troupe, I'd stick her in a
nonspeaking (okay, non-screaming, since I'm not sure yet 
she can speak) role. 

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: trekker@leland.Stanford.EDU (Sanjai Dwivedula Rao)
Subject: Re: Who's Hottest on DS9???
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 93 22:33:47 GMT

In article <1993Jan10.140054.10051@ac.dal.ca> novanet@ac.dal.ca writes:
>I'm voting for Jadzia Dax and Cmdr. Sisko's late wife. 

Jadzia Dax is on my list too, but I also happen to think that Nana Visitor,
as Major Kira, is incredibly gorgeous (even with those bumps on her nose).

Sanjai Rao

-"What sheilds?"



Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: mjv8557@eafs000.ca.boeing.com (Mark J. Vandiver)
Subject: Re: DS9 Good show -- borring theme (No spoilers)
Organization: be41t
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 18:17:50 GMT

meb@sally.acns.nwu.edu (Mark Brodsky) writes:

>In article <1idmcrINN65g@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cq377@cleveland.Freenet.Edu  
>(David C. Williss) writes:
>> 
>> I just saw DS9, and ... is it just me, or does the opening theme
>> reeeelllllyyyy drag?  The show is excellent, but needs a better theme.
>> I saw the  suggestion for a theme to the tune of Gilligan's Island, and
>> it would be better.  Any other suggestions?
>> -- 
You are all missing it! The theme is a comglomeration of the TOS and TNG themes.
Listen to it closely, the horns play a tweaked melody of TNG while the background
melody and tempo are that of TOS. It is a might slow, but you aren't warping
through space at warp 9 either. I kinna like it!

>IMHO I think the show should have a Preable like TOS and TNG. Of course it  
>couldn't be the old "Space, the final frontier....." but I felt like  
>something was missing as the show opened. There definately is room for a  
>preamble in the music.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: 890091b@axe.acadiau.ca (HEIDI JILL BURKHOLDER)
Subject: Re: Female CO for the E  II
Organization: Acadia University
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 13:37:09 GMT

 In article <1992Dec17.225700.499@fsl.noaa.gov> jkl@fsl.noaa.gov (Jennifer
Longstaff) writes:

>I know there have also been plenty of men shown as idiots on the show, but
>I'm trying to remember when a woman was portrayed as *REALLY SMART* or
>competent or a good female role model.  Can anyone help me with this?

	Do you watch the show? I think that having a woman design the ship's 
engine system and that having a woman in charge of security are two 
excellent examples of female role models. Then there is Dr. Krusher who can 
heal anything and her entire medical team (or so it would appear) of women.
I  don't feel excluded and don't understand why you do.
	Heidi
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: forbes@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (Scott Forbes)
Subject: Re: rec.arts.startrek.review?
Organization: Usenet Sports Programming Network
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 22:21:00 GMT

rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu writes:
_\ I was marginally in favor of rec.arts.startrek.reviews back when The Big Split
_\ was being discussed (it was the only group that seemed to serve any useful
_\ purpose to me), but with the explosion of reviews recently, I think it would
_\ be a good idea.  (Now don't everyone faint at once! :-)

I'll take a number.  :-)  You realize, of course, that Tim's going to
have an entire *herd* of cows when he sees this idea resurrected....
But I haven't seen any opposition to the idea thus far.

								   =====
								 =---=====
--								=-----=====
Scott Forbes		AT&T Network Wireless Systems		==---======
Naperville, IL		forbes@icbm.att.com			 =========
								   =====
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: frank@fnbc.com (Frank Mitchell)
Subject: Re: Why aren't there any black aliens?
Organization: First National Bank Of Chicago, Chicago IL, USA
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 93 22:37:45 GMT

In article <s1P3wB3w165w@ailanthus.com> tallman@ailanthus.com (Robert Oliver)  
writes:
> Everyone has already mentioned Klingons, but there was also Paul Winfield 
> in "Darmok" 

While Winfield himself is black, I thought they put salmon-colored makeup and  
latex on him.  (Long time since I saw Darmok, alas, so I could be wrong.)

--
Frank Mitchell,	Business Systems Analyst, First National Bank of Chicago
email:frank@fnbc.com (NeXTmail)

"'I am that merry wanderer of the night'?  I am that giggling, dangerous,  
totally bloody psychotic menace to life and limb, more like it."
-- Peaseblossom, _Sandman_ #19
From: wolfone@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Patrick Chester)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Did parts of DS9 dragged?!
Date: 9 Jan 93 19:58:12 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

In article <1iit37INNmbi@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> yjc@po.CWRU.Edu (Y H J. Chan) writes:
]
]Is it my imagination or that the trip in the wormhole dragged a great deal?
]The other parts were kind of alright ...

A little, but I think that was acceptable anyway. How exciting can explaining
linear time to beings who have no concept if such be? :)
 


-- 
Patrick Chester           |---------------------------------------------------| 
Politically Incorrect     |"The earth is too fragile a basket in which to keep|
Future Lunar Colonist     |  all your eggs." Robert A. Heinlein               |
Another Damn Exception    |"The meek can *have* the Earth. The rest of us are |
claypigeon                |  going to the stars." Robert A. Heinlein          |
Many other stupid titles  |---------------------------------------------------|
From: rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu (rabjab)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: TROI GIF BBS NUMBER
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 01:16:19 GMT
Organization: ucsd
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: lutherlab.ucsd.edu

>term program so that you don't spend the money on a potential long
>distance call and find out the effort was for naught.

so much work to see a tit.

-rabjab
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: CXMP000 <CXMP@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA>
Subject: rec.arts.startrek.review?
Organization: McGill University
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 03:09:40 GMT

In article <1993Jan11.001918.16874@athena.mit.edu> hhuang@athena.mit.edu (Han-Young Huang) writes:
>
>YES!  The bandwidth is getting too much.  So separate DS9 from TNG.
>Continue to separate .misc from .current.  Finally, have a .reviews
>subsection.  So:
>
>rec.arts.startrek.tng.misc
>rec.arts.startrek.tng.current
>rec.arts.startrek.tng.reviews
>rec.arts.startrek.ds9.misc
>rec.arts.startrek.ds9.current
>rec.arts.startrek.ds9.reviews
>
Separating ds9 from tng is STUPID!  How can we compare the two
series?!  However, rec.arts.startrek.reviews would be an excellent
idea!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
!                               ! Address as above or use              !
! Martin Phipps (aka Deja Dude) ! LOULA@hep.physics.mcgill.ca or simply!
!                               ! MUHEP::LOULA if you're on a VAX      !
------------------------------------------------------------------------
!Read my stories on!Read what I have to say on!Not the Technical Manual!
!  alt.comics.lnh  !  rec.arts.comics.xbooks  ! rec.arts.startrek.tech !
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Also look for _The Definitive STAR TREK Parody_ on r.a.startrek.misc
From: lazarus@ug.cs.dal.ca (Chuck Turner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Babylon 5 (was Re: Space Rangers Really Sucks Donkey)
Date: 10 Jan 93 03:35:02 GMT
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

In article <1993Jan8.155405.12521@bnr.ca> stud9j25@bcars243.UUCP (Steven Kostur) writes:
>
>Is Babylon 5 only going to be playing in the US? Being in Canada, I would like to 
>know if I'll be able to get it!

It depends on what American stations your cable company offers.  Here in Halifax
we have the option of picking up WSBK Boston on one of the extended cable 
packages.  There's a list of stations that have picked up Bablyon 5 floating
around somewhere.  Check it out and see if its on any of the stations offered
in your neck of the woods.

						- Chuck 


 _______________________________________ 
|                                       | '..err..of course I suck blood.' 
| "--whether you are quiet and ALIVE or | 'I don't believe you.' 
| quiet and DEAD makes no difference to | 'I've got a straw right here PAL! 
| Cerebus."                             |  You want a demonstration?!'
|       - Cerebus the Aardvark          |                   - The Tick 
|_______________________________________| Chuck Turner -> lazarus@ug.cs.dal.ca
From: rsmith@pearl.tufts.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: E docking with DS9 (was RE: O'Brien's transportation)
Date: 7 Jan 93 19:41:27 GMT
Organization: Tufts University - Medford, MA

In article <1993Jan6.234121.583@rivers>, ph9991_manfr@rivers.acc.uwrf.edu writes:
> the Enterprise was never docked with the station, probably due to the
> E's size, i.e. I don't think the Cardassians designed the station with
> Galaxy-class Federation starships in mind.  Smaller vessels don't seem
> to have any trouble though.
> 
> Steven.K.Manfred

Well, they never STATED that the Enterprise docked (or didn't dock), but they
did SHOW the Enterprise docked with the station.  Either that or they've got
some idiot at the helm who thought it'd be cute to get so close to the station
that they could reach out and touch it.

					--Rod Smith
					  RSMITH@PEARL.TUFTS.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ghost@openage.openage.com (Glenn Host)
Subject: Re: The Final Star Trek Movie?
Organization: Open Age, Inc.
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 20:29:40 GMT

brad@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Brad Barton) writes:

>>I do not want to encourage a part VIII.

>I'd like to see a 7 and 8 to tie us over 'til TNG movies.  But before you
>start flaming or agreeing, I don't think I'd want to see Spock/Kirk/McCoy
>in it as main characters.  Maybe set it 15-20 years ahead and give a promotion
>to Captain Sulu to command the Starfleet flagship, the newly commissioned
>NCC-1701B.  This way, Paramount could canonize events between TNG and TOS
>and TMS (The Movie Series?).  Could be just wishful thinkin'.

I think Captain Sulu would have a lot of appeal even if Spock or McCoy
guest starred (maybe not as much as Kirk since Kirk/Shattner tends to
hog screen time).

-- 

                      Glenn E. Host - Reston, VA
Very grateful guest of Openage - the best SCO service shop in the area
************* my views represent no one - not even myself. ****************
From: ender@triryche.UU.NET (Pete "Ender" Walsh)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: DAX in Starfleet?!?
Date: 13 Jan 1993 05:39:52 GMT
Organization: UUNET Communications
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: triryche.uu.net

In article <cogar-120193083836@cogarmac.nswc.navy.mil>, cogar@cogarmac.nswc.navy.mil (John R Cogar) writes:
|> I may have missed the conversation on this but...
|> 
|> 1. How did a Trill get into Starfleet?  A 200 yr old LT?  I don't know
|> about that.  How did it pass transporter class at the academy? (The
|> question of the transporter and the Trill has been discussed.)

But the Lt. ISN'T 200+ years old, her symbiont is.  Rick Berman stated in Starlog
"Dax is a combination of a 28-year-old Starfleet Science Officer and a breed of
500-year old symbiont that was joined with her approximately three years ago."
So Jadzia (as I have started referering to the human host) is a Starfleet Science Officer with a rank of Lt., Dax (as I refer to the worm/symbiont) is not.  So,
The host could have gone to the academy BEFORE the worm was implanted.

|> 2. Furthermore, where does LT. Dax get off calling COMMANDER Sisco by his
|> first name in an official (i.e. not alone) situation?  

Goooood question.

|> I know they are old friends, but when was the last time you heard Worf call
|> Riker "Will"?  Even Troi sticks with "COMMANDER" when she and Riker are not
|> alone, and they go way back.
|> 
|> They need to clear these two things up before I'll feel comfortable with
|> the Dax character.  
|> 
|> John R Cogar                 | Always expect the worst.
|> cogar@mv5.nswc.navy.mil      | That way you won't be disappointed.

===============================================-=============================
Pete "Ender" Walsh, AlterNet Junior Engineer   | Internet: ender@uunet.uu.net
UUNet Technologies, Falls Church, VA.	       | UUCP: {anysite}!uunet!ender
===============================================-=============================
  "If you can keep your head while all those about you are losing theirs,
   then perhaps you have misunderstood the situation." - _The_Long_Run_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: jwells@netcom.com (Court Jester)
Subject: Re: Where's the Borg?
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 06:17:27 GMT

mlee@post.RoyalRoads.ca (Malcolm Lee) writes:

>There were hints also at the end of the first season in which they introduced
>the new and improved Romulans of some Borg activity.  As you may or may not
>recall, the Big-E was called to the Neutral Zone area to investigate some sort
>of phenomenon as was a Romulan warbird.  The Romulans mentioned something about
>a number of their colonies having been "scooped" mysteriously.  And then they
>ended the show at that and left us hanging.

>Looking back in hindsight, it must have been the Borg.  We have seen what they
>do to lowly colonies.

I agree. In "The Neutral Zone" both Federation and Romulan outposts were
described as being completely removed from their planets. This would be
consistent with the sight in "The Best of Both Worlds I".

But I keep wondering: If the Borg was right there on our back porch, why
didn't they invade completely at that time? Perhaps they thought we were
irrelevant, until they met the Enterprise thanks to Q in "Q Who". Maybe
then they realized we had to be assimilated..

Just something that seemed strange.. =)

-- 
     || (||)  The Court Jester               "Citizens of the planet
     ||       From the House of Xon   \    /  Earth...  We bring you
  () || ()    Long live The Leader!    \  /   greetings, and we come
     ||                                 \/    in peace."
(||) ||       jwells@netcom.netcom.com       "Resist.... or perish!"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ynecelc@sx.mont.nec.com (Ellison Chan)
Subject: Re: DS9: Bajoran spaceflight
Organization: HNSX Supercomputers
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 15:15:18 GMT

In article <1ilpj3INNn7v@menudo.uh.edu> HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.) writes:
>In <1il21pINNjh1@shelley.u.washington.edu> gwangung@carson.u.washington.edu writes:
>
>> In article <C0K4GB.HnK@cup.hp.com> jem@cup.hp.com (Jim McCauley) writes:
>> >Which might be subtitled, "Why Don't the Bajorans Own the Universe?"
>> 
>> 	Because not all races are as relentlessly imperialistic as the
>> North American-white dominated Federation.
>
>  Oh come on, the USA hasn't invaded a South American country in at least two
>years.  The Canadians might invade themselves, but I don't think that counts...

Hey, hey...watch it buddy. It certainly would count. :)

-- 
Ellison Chan, Comp. Sys. Analyst               2350 Place TransCanadienne
HNSX Supercomputers Inc., NEC Corp.        Dorval, Quebec, Canada H9P 2X5
E-mail: ellison@SX.Mont.NEC.COM          (514)684-7705, FAX (514)684-8619
From: trw@spl1.spl.loral.com (Tim R Witort)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Did parts of DS9 dragged?!
Date: 8 Jan 93 16:02:16 GMT
Organization: Loral Software Productivity Laboratory

In article <1993Jan8.112936.7243@leland.Stanford.EDU>, trekker@leland.Stanford.EDU (Sanjai Dwivedula Rao) writes:
|> In article <1iit37INNmbi@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> yjc@po.CWRU.Edu (Y H J. Chan) writes:
|> >
|> >Is it my imagination or that the trip in the wormhole dragged a great deal?
|> >The other parts were kind of alright ...
|> 
|> I think you're absolutely right.  The whole wormhole sequence was mixed with
|> the rest of the plot and dragged for about 45 minutes.  While the concept
|> and the content were good, I think they could have accomplished what they
|> wanted in a lot less time.

   I thought it was wonderfully paced.  It wasn't overdone and they
didn't beat any dead horses while communicating with Sisko and they
investigated some really thought provoking concepts in a very original
manner.  The fact that you wanted it to be done in less time may be
a side-effect of the tension they created (not to psychoanalyze you
of course).  We're too accustomed too quick and tidy TV plots. IMHO
It was very refreshing to see DS9 take the time to develop Sisko and
and keep the plot interesting.
   I never heard anyone complain about all of that "wasted" time in
"The Inner Light" when they developed the plot... it was artisting
and engaging.

-- Tim
From: erwin@bend.ucsd.edu (Sean Erwin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Space Rangers Really Sucks Donkey
Date: 7 Jan 1993 05:40:08 GMT
Organization: Linguistics Department, UCSD
NNTP-Posting-Host: bend.ucsd.edu


What a nasty yicky show.  Makes DS9 seem like a masterpiece.  It won't last
long.  Next up:  Babylon 5....

---Sean