HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Company: NAVSURFWARCEN COASTSYSTA
Address: Code N3130 Panama City, FL
Phone: (904) 235-5994
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 16 Apr 1992 07:20:47 CDT
From:         Moore <moore@EMAIL.NCSC.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      More Windows Text FIles
X-To:         win3-l@uicvm.uic.edu

These files were just downloaded from Microsoft and are available on my PC
server @ 130.109.115.184 (anonymous/your-mail-id):

WW0524.EXE     20198   4-03-92  Troubleshooting GP Faults (UAEs)
WW0525.EXE     17949   4-03-92  Troubleshooting 386 Enhanced Mode Problems
WW0526.EXE     19340   4-03-92  Troubleshooting Windows Setup
WW0527.EXE     21443   4-03-92  New Features in Windows 3.1
WW0528.EXE     25274   4-03-92  Fonts and Windows 3.1
WW0532.EXE     26163   4-03-92  Object Linking and Embedding (OLE)
WW0335.EXE     37445   4-07-92  Windows Memory Management
WW0530.EXE     28984   4-09-92  SMARTDrive and 32-Bit Disk Access *1

XL3QA.EXE      32289   3-20-92  Fast Tips for Excel for Windows
WE0125.EXE     19232   3-31-92  Working with Cell Reference from Macro
WE0127.EXE     18638   3-31-92  Dates and Times
WE0146.EXE     24605   4-03-92  Top Questions and Answers for Excel 3.0
WE0404.EXE    126017   3-31-92  Excel Custom Help File Conversion Utility

BV0442.EXE     36181   3-25-92  Huge Array Support in DLL for VB
BV0447.EXE     43539   3-26-92  WINAPI.TXT File for Visual Basic

Again, this is a PC server, so it's going to be slow.  Restricted hours access
is no longer necessary:  hammer it whenever you want.

I'll check the Service periodically, but for now that's all the stuff up there
of interest to me.

(*1) This file used to be named 32ba.exe; it's the same content.

--
Jim (moore@email.ncsc.navy.mil)
The only good Congressman is a glowing Congressman.  Nuke Washington.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 06:52:00 EST
From:         Michael Gordon <GORDONM@DENISON.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: HELP: Lost my MT Fonts for WfW 2.0 !

>Anyone have a clue as to what the program is? ANOTHER THING, I use to have
>a PCLFONTS directory (which I believe was created when I originally
>installed WfW 2.0), that directory is no longer with me...is that the
>problem? Is so,  what is the cure?
>
 I would guess that, because you were installing w4w into 3.1, w4w assumed you
didn't need the pclfonts (because of truetype), which is true--you don't need
them.

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  7-APR-1992 06:52:11
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 23:32:00 EDT
From:         Vince Scarafino <Scarafino@MULTICS-A.PMS.FORD.COM>
Subject:      Re: DOS startup directories in Win 3.1
X-To:         Microsoft Windows Version 3 Forum
              <WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>

 >Date:  8 April 1992 21:06 edt
 >From:  Ronald Hahm <hahm at ISCSVAX.UNI.EDU>
 >Subject:  DOS startup directories in Win 3.1

 >Has anyone noticed that when you launch DOS apps in 3.1 that windows seems to
 >point to the Windows subdirectory and not to the directory that one states in
 >the startup directory box in the pif editor.  I have been having a problem
 with
 >this with a particular dos program that I use.  My only solution has been to
 >have the PIF file launch a batch file that sends windows to the correct
 >directory and execute the files.  Has anyone experienced this?  Is this a bug
 >in Win 3.1?
 >
 >--
 >+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 >|Ronald Hahm               INTERNET ADDRESS:  HAHM@ISCSVAX.UNI.EDU        |
 >+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Windows 3.1 adds support for "Working Directory".  Could the Windows
directory be the default chosen if you don't specify a working
directory?  This is only a guess on my part, since I haven't any
experience with 3.1.

Vince
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X400-Trace: AT*PTT*ZAMET; arrival Mon, 6 Apr 92 14:28:22 +0300 action Relayed
P1-Message-ID: AT*PTT*ZAMET; 920406142402239-GBA930
UA-Content-ID: 920406142402239-
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 14:28:22 +0300
From:         KARGRA@GBA930.ZAMG.AC.AT
Subject:      Re: Is this list for OS/2 as well?"
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@helios.BITNET

Now folks, I'd say this is definitly a list for win3.x users, not OS2. The fact
that OS2 looks like win3 and runs win3 software (or not) does not make OS2 be
win3. If OS2ers have trouble using win3 software, this should remain their
problem. I don't think, that an average win3 user can tell, why some program
won't run under OS2, just because he does not use OS2.
SINCERELY, Alfred
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 16:13:00 EDT
From:         CSS544480@MANVAX.BITNET
Subject:      RE: FONTS in non-Windows Apps

Check to see if your running in 386enhanced mode....
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 22:29:00 EST
From:         "CSCON134@UOFT02.BITNET : INDIANA JONES (JOHN HEIDEN)"
              <CSCON134@UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Win3.1 upgrade for $29 ????

> Someone posted info on a company that was selling the Windows 3.1 upgrade for
> only $29. If anyone here saw it and kept it could you please re-post?
> Thanks!
================================================================================
Actually, that was I who said that.

I received my upgrade notice from Z-Nix Corp that I could upgrade to
Windows 3.1 for only $29.95 (including shipping!) the other day.  But
the offer ends at the end of May.

Also, the offer is only good for those with registered copies of the
Z-Nix version of Windows 3.0.  So, if you don't have Z-Nix MS Windows 3.0,
I don't think you can get it.  But the form I have merely says I must
send in the card they sent me with a check and that's it.  I don't
need to send an invoice, receipt, disk or page from the manual.  Just
the card.  So, perhaps they would accept a letter instead of the form.

Well, I suppose it's worth a shot.  No?

Sincerely


John Heiden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Heiden

                                       Dept. of Computer Services

CSCON134@Uoft02.UTOLEDO.EDU            The University of Toledo
CSCON134@Uoft02.BITNET                 Toledo, Ohio     U.S.A.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
From: regoli@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Michael Regoli)
Subject: Important News from CICA
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 17:47:37 GMT


][

The ftp archives at the Center for Innovative Computing Applications
(CICA) have been re-opened after an always untimely disk crash.  While
things aren't quite perfect, we are back on-line and accepting
anonymous ftp connections.

The important news is that we've had a name change.  The old archive
site, cica.cica.indiana.edu [129.79.20.22] has been moved to a new
machine: 
		 ftp.cica.indiana.edu [129.79.20.84]

Please modify any references to the old system to reflect this name
and IP number change.

Our sincere thanks for your patience during the outage.  Please direct
inquiries to me at ftp@cica.indiana.edu.

-- 
michael regoli
regoli@ucs.indiana.edu
regoli@iubacs.bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 10:21:34 BST
From:         Derek Jones <derek@AIVRU.SHEF.AC.UK>
Subject:      3.1 *AND* 3.0 on same machine
X-cc:         derek@uknet.ac.uk

Anyone done this? Is it possible?

If so, any special requirements?

How to keep things separate? Can they use the same swapfile?

stuff like that......8-)

help appreciated

regards

Derek Jones.

System Manager.
A.I. Vision Research Unit, Sheffield University, Western Bank,
Sheffield.  S10 2TN. U.K.
Tel: (+44) (0)742 768555 X 6551  	email:  derek@aivru.sheffield.ac.uk
FAX: (+44) (0)742 766515
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: win3-l@uicvm.BITNET
X-VMS-To: in%"win3-l@uicvm.bitnet"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 09:47:00 MET
From:         Rob Lussenburg <LUSSENBURG@RULBR2.LEIDENUNIV.NL>
Subject:      Re: Windows 3.1 upgrade

The address 'asano@hg.uleth.ca' was unknown to the Postmaster, so I'll have
to post it to the list:

Manabu,

The 3.1 upgrade consists of 7 2HD 3.5" disks.

Sincerely,

Rob Lussenburg
Rijksuniversiteit Leiden
The Netherlands
LUSSENBURG@RULBR2.LeidenUniv.nl


----- End forwarded message
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: BITNET%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 09:08:00 GMT
From:         Vincent D'Haeyere <INFSTDDHAEY@BNANDP51.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: HELP: Lost my MT Fonts for WfW 2.0 !

Hi,

  You experience some problems with your fonts as I did a few time ago... Here
is the solution or at least I think it may work (in fact it worked for me first
time).

  Go into the Control Panel. Select the Font Management Tool (those silly A's).
Then select the offending fonts you miss in the Equation Editor and delete them.
   Do not erase them from disk as it is possible from a switch in the dialog box
    !

  Exit the Control Panel and reenter it in the Font Management section. Now
select the Add button. And look on your disk for the fonts you have just
deleted and reinstall them all...

  Now I think it's done. Exit Control Panel. Restart Word for Windows, launch
the Equation Editor and all should go right first time. ( If not, you should
perhaps restart Windows).

  I hope this helps...

  See you soon in Netland,

                           Vincent D'Haeyere
                           Bitnet : infstddhaey@bnandp51
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sat, 11 Apr 1992 23:17:22 EDT
From:         Les Padzik <ADOLP@SUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Subscription to Win3-l

Type this:

  tell listserv at uicvm sub win3-l

and in couple minutes you should be on!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X400-Trace: AT*PTT*ZAMET; arrival Mon, 6 Apr 92 10:19:21 +0300 action Relayed
P1-Message-ID: AT*PTT*ZAMET; 920406101753605-GBA930
UA-Content-ID: 920406101753605-
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 10:19:21 +0300
From:         KARGRA@GBA930.ZAMG.AC.AT
Subject:      HIDOS.SYS
X-To:         win3-l%uicvm.bitnet@helios.BITNET

HIDOS.SYS is in fact a troublemaker. Try replacing it with HIMEM.SYS from
MS-DOS 5.0. This will shurely affect the HIDEVICE and HIGHLOAD statemants.
But it still is better to QEMM to manage the spaceproblems, than using DR-DOS
at all. DR-DOS is only quite compatible, but not 100%. So switch over.

Sincerely, Alfred
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 16:19:00 MET
From:         Rob Lussenburg <LUSSENBURG@RULBR2.LEIDENUNIV.NL>
Subject:      Re: And again Win3.1

On Mon, 6 Apr 1992 14:46:26 MEZ, Uwe Hauck <UWEHAUCK@DOSUNI1.BITNET> wrote:

> Well, maybe this is a boring and old question, but i am new on this list
> and just want to know, how compatible is win3.1 versus win3.0. Can I
> still use my old win3.0 software I developed, or will I have to rewrite
> all that stuff ?

In my experience: everything that runs in 3.0, runs in 3.1.

> And what about commercial programs in the future.
> Will there be software only running on win3.1 or will everything work
> with win3.0 as well ?
> Lots of questions indeed...

When Windows 3.1 or a future version will be well & truly settled, perhaps
developers may or may not stop providing compatibility with Windows 3.0. Nobody
can guarantee that future programs will stay compatible with Windows 3.0
forever.

Sincerely,

Rob Lussenburg
Rijksuniversiteit Leiden
the Netherlands
LUSSENBURG@RULBR2.LeidenUniv.nl
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Project IDEALS -- The University of Alabama
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 15:19:05 CDT
From:         "Chet Farmer, Asst. Dir., Project IDEALS" <CFARMER1@UA1VM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: wfw2.0 vs. wfw2.0a?

On Mon, 13 Apr 1992 07:30:00 EST Michael Gordon said:
>        The "undoing" of the draft switch was there in 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 2.0, and
>2.0a; so I guess it's a "feature" and I agree it's annoying....
>
>Michael D. Gordon
>gordonM@cc.denison.edu
>Date sent:  13-APR-1992 07:30:24

Yuck!  Oh well--thanks for the prompt reply.  Before I adopted 2.0, I hadn't
touched wfw since an early 1.0 under windows 2.x (prior, even to win3's
takeover), hence I was unaware of the "feature."

-c

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Chet Farmer, Assistant Director   |   English / 103 Morgan           |
|  Project IDEALS -- FIPSE, DoE      |   Tuscaloosa, AL  35487-0244     |
|  University of Alabama             |   tel 205-348-9494               |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <haley>
X-Orig-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:13:20 EDT
X-Orig-From: Les Padzik <ADOLP%SUVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu>
X-Orig-Message-Id: <9204110121.AA02145@logdis1.sm.aflc.af.mil>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:33:18 -0800
From:         "TSGT Rusty Haley;2852 SPS/SPPC" <haley@LOGDIS1.SM.AFLC.AF.MIL>
Subject:      Re: Windows 3.1 upgrade price
X-To:         win3-l%uicvm.bitnet@uga.cc.uga.edu

In your message of 10 Apr 1992 at 1821 PDT, you write:
> What is the phone # of Z-Nix Co.?
>
The number I hav for technical support is 714-629-3018.

Rusty
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 16 Apr 1992 19:33:03 EST
From:         David Heck <O1DSH@AKRONVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Windows 3.1 Pricing...

An associate here at Akron University purchased the 3.1 upgrade from
our friendly neighborhood Waldensoftware, and found out that they would
be raising the price for Windows 3.1 on April 20...nothing succeeds like
success!  Couldn't get the salesperson to divulge the new price...heavy
sigh...anyone else heard anything about 3.1 price hikes?

David


David Heck
Information Services
University of Akron
Akron, OH  44325-3501
(216)972-7187
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Company: NAVSURFWARCEN COASTSYSTA
Address: Code N3130 Panama City, FL
Phone: (904) 235-5994
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 17:10:39 CDT
From:         Moore <moore@EMAIL.NCSC.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Win3.1 vs System Resources
X-To:         win3-l@uicvm.uic.edu

Well, there's one thing that Windows 3.1 shares with 3.0:  it
still fritters away system resources as you open and close appli-
cations, windows, etc.  I keep looking for a loose cable where
the memory bits may be escaping but haven't found it yet....

--
Jim (moore@email.ncsc.navy.mil)
A record budget deficit every year, and people complain about a bunch of
bounced personal checks.  Duh.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:13:20 EDT
From:         Les Padzik <ADOLP@SUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Windows 3.1 upgrade price

What is the phone # of Z-Nix Co.?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: NETWORK ARIADNE , NCSR DEMOCRITOS
X-Charset: ELOT_928
X-Char-Esc: 29
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 00:26:36 -0500
Comments:     <Parser> W: Field "Resent-From:/From:" duplicated. Last
              occurrence was retained.
Comments:     <Parser> W: Field "From:" duplicated. Last occurrence was
              retained.
Comments:     <Parser> W: Field "FROM:" duplicated. Last occurrence was
              retained.
From:         "George Gavathas - Athens Innovation CEnter"
              <ggavath@LEON.NRCPS.ARIADNE-T.G>
Subject:      Re: Windows 3.1 vs Windows NT
              a

> NT will utilize separate address spaces for each of its processes,
> providing a higher level of robustness.  It will be harder to crash, and
> could thus be a better development environment than 3.1.  NT will also
> provide symmetric multiprocessor support, which would make a difference
> if you have more than one processor in your PC and like to run lots of

        Does that means that it will be able to utilize transputers ?

        Is there any rumor about going multi  user ?


                                        George---
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:29:00 EDT
From:         ERIC WEBB <EWZ@NCCIBM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Diamond Stealth

> 	I am considering buying the (much valued on this board) Diamond
> Stealth video board. I will be using it with a NEC 3D, at 1024x768 interlaced
> mode. Any recommendations or considerations from anyone?
>
> 		Kevin
Kevin,
  You may find that, at 1024x768, you will want to get a monitor with
more screen area. 15" to 17" monitors are a good choice, as long as
the dot pitch is .28mm or less and refresh rates meet VESA standards.
But monitors are expensive. NEC markets a new FG line of flat screen
monitors. The 15" is under $1000, and the 17" retails for about $1600.

I'm going to check out the May BYTE magazine, which reviews lots of high
resolution monitors. I hope to find a good bang for the buck.

Regards,
Eric Webb
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l,misc.forsale.computers,comp.os.msdos.misc
From: fredw@mks.com (Fred Walter)
Subject: Re: An incredible deal
Organization: Mortice Kern Systems Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 00:03:13 GMT

In article <1992Apr2.103836.2559@vax1.umkc.edu> dhawan@vax1.umkc.edu writes:
>
>FOR AN INCREDIBLE DEAL:   1-800-949-7280
>
>ALL total market price (suggested)  $19,832
> 
>Sale price (special offfer from PC/Computing Mag):  $1,278.43
> 
>Call B&R Computers at 1-800-949-7280

You moron. Did you call this number before posting this ? I just called it -
it sounded too good to be true. It is too good to be true.
There is a recording that says it isn't true, has some minor insulting
and ends with "Yo-yo, the check is in your mouth".

	fred
-- 
Disclaimer: everything I post is my *personal* opinion and does not represent
or reflect the opinion of the company which employs me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
G. R. (Fred) Walter, Mortice Kern Systems Inc.,	Internet: fredw@mks.com
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Organization: SUNY at Plattsburgh, New York, USA
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: WIN3-L
X-VMS-Cc: W_GRAZIADEI
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 00:54:00 EST
From:         "William D. Graziadei" <GRAZIAWD@SNYPLAVA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: D'Compress aka ZipManager

Michael Gordon, you said in a recent Win3-L post.......

>        ZipManager has been updated (with a name change) to D'Compress and is
>supposed to work with 3.1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is the "exact" name of the D'Compress and is it on CICA, WUARCHIVE?
I couldn't locate it using Archie. Thanks in advance.


   Regards,

      Bill

   Question: What is remedial mitosis?

   Signature and answer follows:










         _____________________________________________________________________
        / William D. Graziadei, Ph.D. / In Vitro Cell Biology & Biotechnology/|
       /=============================/======================================/_/
      /         US Mail             /              EMail                    G /
     /  MINER CENTER               / GRAZIAWD (Local)                     ___/
    /  SUNY PLATTSBURGH/MINER INST/ SPLAVA::GRAZIAWD (DecNet)            / /
   /  CHAZY, NEW YORK 12921      / GRAZIAWD@SNYPLAVA.BITNET (BitNet)    / /
  /  TEL (518) 846-7144         / GRAZIAWD@SPLAVA.CC.PLATTSBURGH.EDU   / /
 /  FAX (518) 846-8445         / WGRAZIADEI@BIOTECHNET.COM(BiotechNet)/ /
/_____________________________/______________________________________/ /
|____________________________/\______________________________________|/

"Remedial mitosis is a math course for cells that can't multiply or divide."
Instructor: Dr. G. Factor; Sections: G1, G0 (Remedial), S, G2, M; Time: Varies
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 11:11:23 EDT
From:         pkierstead@FAC.CABOT.NF.CA
Subject:      Re: An incredible deal

>If that was an add in a magazine, wouldn't the post office have something
>to say?  Something like mail fraud or something like that?

IT WAS A BLOODY JOKE!!!!! April fools? You know..ha ha? It didn't even cost
any money....toll free number.

Paul Kierstead
pkierstead@fac.cabot.nf.ca
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Project IDEALS -- The University of Alabama
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 13:37:46 CDT
From:         "Chet Farmer, Asst. Dir., Project IDEALS" <CFARMER1@UA1VM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Winword 2.0a

On Wed, 8 Apr 1992 08:32:20 EDT Harry M. Kriz said:
>In response to comment that the Winword 2.0a bug fixes are in esoteric
>areas:
>
>I ran in to one of the bugs the first day I used Winword 2.0.  If
>you are using headers and footers and run the spelling checker in
>version 2.0, you will get an Unrecoverable Application Error when
>Winword moves from the header to the footer and encounters a
>possible spelling error. The fix, of course, is to exit the
>spell checker when it first stops in the footer, rather than
>trying to change the word or ignore it.

I never got UAEs--I just lost my headers.  Quite irritating, especially
before it was widely known that 2.0 had bugs.  "Dammit, I *KNOW* I
already defined my header....where'd it go....."

Oh, well.  uSoft has promised me 2.0a in about a week.
-c

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Chet Farmer, Assistant Director   |   English / 103 Morgan           |
|  Project IDEALS -- FIPSE, DoE      |   Tuscaloosa, AL  35487-0244     |
|  University of Alabama             |   tel 205-348-9494               |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X400-Trace: AT*PTT*ZAMET; arrival Mon, 6 Apr 92 09:50:10 +0300 action Relayed
P1-Message-ID: AT*PTT*ZAMET; 920406094713887-GBA930
UA-Content-ID: 920406094713887-
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 09:50:10 +0300
From:         KARGRA@GBA930.ZAMG.AC.AT
Subject:      Reply to Upgrading to Win 3.1
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@helios.BITNET

No, you don't need a new PC. WIN 3.1 should run on 80286 and higher, it's only
the 8088/86 that's not supprtrd anymore, because of the standard mode.
BTW, I have a question too: will there be a commandlineswitch to force either
standard or enhanced-mode? (like WIN /2, WIN /3)
Sincerely, Alfred
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 08:26:47 -0600
From:         CA6732@SIUCVMB.BITNET
Subject:      Windows 3.0 won't run.

 *** Reply to note of 04/15/92 03:28
 *****               John Buijk              *****
 ***** Micro-Computer Software Specialist II *****
 *****   Computing Affairs, Wham, 453-6149   *****
 We had a similar problem where windows 3.0 would run in real or standard mode
 but when you tried to run it in enhanced mode you received the startup screen
 and a "C" prompt.  The cause of the problem was the JOSHI virus.  F-Protect
 had no problem handling it and everything works fine now.  jb  :)

 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 -=  JOHN BUIJK - SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY AT CARBONDALE -=
 =-  CA6732@SIUCVMB.BITNET - SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU - 131.230.1.2   =-
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU