HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: irvine@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Brent Irvine)
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 23:04:14 GMT

In article <1473@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
>vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>: In article <1458@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>, libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
>:  
>: > Oh, Christ- this wallabee-fucking strine geek is fixated on me now.
>: > Somebody wanna divert him for me, maybe wave a kangaroo dick at him
>: > or something?  I'll sneak up behind him and untie his shoes, so's
>: > he falls off the bottom of the planet...
>: > Bill    
>: 
>: Ladies and Gentleme, Bill has finally conceeded that he is a spineless prick
>: that does not deserve our attention. No Bill, no one is going to save you now.
>: No one is going to "divert" Kevin for you. Stand on your own two feet young
>: man... there is no place for you to hide here.
>: 
>: --The Phantom      
>
>Listen!  Footsteps on the stairs!  A low, mournful moan!  Could
>this thread be... haunted?     

Nah, its Phantom prancing around upstairs jerking off.


-- 
+-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
| Brent L. Irvine         |These opinions are the opinions of the majority of |
| irvine@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu | space aliens currently in residence in the USA.   |
+-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 23 Nov 1992 15:04:56 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

hey, fellow flameheads, i'm temporarily back from the land of the
DEAD, maybe i'll even get to read your choice (if lame) flames back
<*yawn*> ooops, where was i?

hey, i just got into this clinton thread, but i'm wondering, how is
it that some limp aussie wanker (hello, mathew, longtime no
email:) from the outback knows more about our constitution than we
do????  huh?

'cause all our bests talents are sitting around flaming the crap out
of each other instead of educating themselves as to our political
process? naa, that couldn't be it, there's very little talent in
here ...

hey, bur, what happened, you fall off in the other ocean while
jogging?

aza ............... !

missed you guyz.  almost!  but then i shot again and hitcha!!

moi
>>---|>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jac@doe.carleton.ca (James A. Cherry)
Subject: Top ten anagrams of "Bruce Bufalini" and "Kenneth Robinson"
Summary: Here's what I think of those two...
Keywords: anagrams, ken, bruce
Organization: Dept. of Electronics, Carleton University
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:04:20 GMT

TOP TEN ANAGRAMS OF "BRUCE BUFALINI":

   10. Incubi bear flu

    9. Unifiable curb

    8. A fine uric bulb!

    7. Uric nebula fib

    6. If able, ruin cub

    5. Urinal cube fib

    4. Unfair cub bile

    3. Uric fib? Unable

    2. Ban if uric lube


And the number one anagram of "Bruce Bufalini" is:

    1. Fib! Nil beau cur!  [Bruce's answer when confronted with allegations
                            about him & Rob Dobson's dog]


TOP TEN ANAGRAMS OF "KENNETH (J.) ROBINSON":

   10. Been inkhorn snot

    9. Inherent knob son

    8. Ken: no thin boners!  [Ken only wants thick ones]

    7. Ken's john-boner tin  [And Ken says he has no use for masturbation!]

    6. Nth son in bone jerk  [The TRUE story of Ken's birth]

    5. Ken: throbs in none   [Except Bruce, maybe]

    4. Oh, no: bent skinner!

    3. N.B. Shot jerk in none  [But Borg can't ejaculate, can they?]

    2. Hint, Ken: no boners  [Try women instead]


And the number one anagram of "Kenneth Robinson" is:

    1. Boners, then inn, OK?  [Ken's daily request to Bruce, no doubt]


Heh heh...
--
James A. Cherry                                         "Deal with it, pal!"
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Thomas Jefferson
Date: 23 Nov 92 15:17:30 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <Nov.22.08.15.38.1992.5258@romulus.rutgers.edu> kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu (Theodore A. Kaldis) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.145703.1@uwovax.uwo.ca> 4224_5201@uwovax.uwo.ca (Dark Lord of the Sith) writes:
>
>> God bless Thomas Jefferson.  He knew that less government was better
>> government, and the government that was closest to the people serves
>> them better.  Is it any wonder Canada is so fucked up?
>
>Hear, hear!
>-- 

Well, you two little masturbation boyz ought to come on down to Uva, where
such ejaculatory worship of TJ is the norm. Of course, its somewhat
ironic, ya know; TJ was a revoltuionary, a breaker of tradition, but now
all these idiots like theo here and this lousy kanuck want to freeze 
jefferson in time; in short, trapping him into a sedentary 'tradition'
which he would probably depsise.

And theo, o yeah. Didnt you just say that you would have voted for
Oregon's Amendment 2? Do you honestly think Jefferson would have
supported such an amendment. I seriously doubt it; any constitutional
amendment in which the government sets an official moral policy
is 'tyranny upon the human mind', dont you think?

idiots

-r
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Information needed
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:20:39 GMT


In article after article after article,
krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:


>K e n is K e n, and you are
>misinformed.

tell us, k e n, since you use this phrase verbatim in so many of your posts,
do you have a macro for it? or maybe a whole set?

Alt 1 K e n is K e n, and you are misinformed

Alt 2 Initiate standard washing procedures

Alt 3 K e n is K e n, and therefore K e n cannot be boring


etc. etc.
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 20 Nov 92 18:30:56 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
: In article <1458@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>, libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
:  
: > Oh, Christ- this wallabee-fucking strine geek is fixated on me now.
: > Somebody wanna divert him for me, maybe wave a kangaroo dick at him
: > or something?  I'll sneak up behind him and untie his shoes, so's
: > he falls off the bottom of the planet...
: > Bill    
: 
: Ladies and Gentleme, Bill has finally conceeded that he is a spineless prick
: that does not deserve our attention. No Bill, no one is going to save you now.
: No one is going to "divert" Kevin for you. Stand on your own two feet young
: man... there is no place for you to hide here.
: 
: --The Phantom      

Listen!  Footsteps on the stairs!  A low, mournful moan!  Could
this thread be... haunted?     
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: K E N is, as usual, wrong as reign
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:45:37 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.214851.1@opie.bgsu.edu> bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:

>Maybe ken *has* rented your pooch, but ken is not K e n, and
>K e n has spoken the truth when he said that he has not rented
>your dog.  If you still insist that K e n has done such a thing,
>then you arte hopelessly misinformed.
>
>--L e a h  S c h o l l
>

O MY GOD! Its replicating!! quick, someone at psu hit ^C, k e n is 
S P R E A D I N G!!!


Newsgroups: alt.flame,rec.humor
From: krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Where's K e n?
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:42:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov21.004821.29696@muddcs.claremont.edu> weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
>In article <By10uo.6F1@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <lefty-191192131019@lefty.apple.com> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>>>In article <Bxxyzu.KFE@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu
>>>(Kenneth J Robinson) wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> K e n always has information handy whenever it is required...
>>>
>>>Say, F'Ken, I need to know the value of Planck's constant in the
>>>furlong/fortnight/hundredweight system.  D'you have _that_ handy?
>>
>>The information for which you have requested is irrelevant, thus K e n
>>does not have it handy. Your request has been denied.
>>
>	Is K e n saying he won't inform us? The world must be coming to an 
>end.

Irrelevant information is exactly that, irrelevant. There is no need
to inform people of irrelevant data. It serves no purpose. Thus, K e n
will inform you with relevant information. The world is not coming to
an end. You have been informed.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Organization: William Rainey Harper College; Palatine, IL  60067
Date: Saturday, 14 Nov 1992 14:38:46 CST
From: <BWUNSCHE@HARPERVM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject:    pay for tv

i guess you clowns dont get it , sorry about that !!!!
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: K e n Informs Liz As To The Purpose Of A Penis (was Re: K e n Informs Mr. Cress)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 20:37:37 GMT

In article <1eoiskINN2pe@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>In article <By4LAE.6ro@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu 
>(Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>
>>The more appendages that are applied to the keyboard,
>>the more characters that can be typed.
>>
>
>Does this mean that K e n uses his penis as well as his hands when he types?

No, K e n only uses fingers for such activities. K e n uses K e n's
penis for other activities, which is not a topic of discussion. A penis
was not designed for typing. It's main purpose is copulation. The arousal
of the penis to various forms of stimulation allows it to succeed at this
purpose. Please inform yourself of this.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: kev@eccles.dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: The word on the street.
Date: 19 Nov 92 12:46:31 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

Speaking to a Canadian the other day, I have found that the word on the
street appears to be "bus lane."  Another one that remains popular is
"give way."

So when somone asks you for the word on the street, you can answer with
confidence.  I hope that clears up any confusion.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: Frank@Deep_13 (TV's Frank)
Subject: test 
Organization: Gizmonic Institute
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 03:06:13 GMT

Test
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Bush? (was: Why Clinton)
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:10:37 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
: In article <1409@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>, libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
: > You guys have been arguing this "Bush didn't say that" horseshit
: 
: "horseshit" Ah. Bill has enlarged his vocabulary. Excellent Bill. You have been
: listening to those "Power Tapes" by Tony Robbins haven't you?
: 
: >  What else could he have meant, Casper 
: > the Phriendly Phantom?  C'mon, give it a try.
: 
: Ok. Here's a try: You have the attentionspan of an old man fornicating. You see
: wilbur, HE DIDN'T SAY THAT. That was in the original post. And if he did... so
: what? He's not president any more! You won ok? By continuing this pathetic
: attempt at wit and Socratic reasoning, you only further the point that you can
: only manage baseless arguements. So which is it, Billy Boy? Are you a moron or
: do you have the attentionspan of an old man fornicating? You decide... but
: alas, choose well for it is a decision that will stick for the rest of your
: life.  

Hmm.   I always thought the Phantom had the power to cloud *other*
men's minds.  Why, Casper, will neither of you to right-wing
half-wits ANSWER MY FUCKING QUESTION?
In case you've forgotten, here's the question again, in words of
one syllable:
If George Bush not mean what I say he mean, then what he do mean?
If you're not going to answer that question, then we really don't 
have an argument.  At any rate, I'm not going to continue this
conversation, since we are all saying the same thing over and over,
you don't seem to have anything to say which would support your 
postion, and you're really quite a tiresome little ghost.
Over and out,
Bill   
k
: 
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: clare@nynexst.com (Clare Chu)
Subject: Re: More Money than Votes
Organization: Nynex Science and Technology
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 15:11:29 GMT

In article <LAUNCE.92Nov19132241@medusa.med.utah.edu> launce@medusa.med.utah.edu (Tri-Ungulate) writes:
>
>Arthur T Hu and Danielle T Wei -- seperated at birth??  
>
>In article <BxGzp7.IFv@acsu.buffalo.edu> dtwei@acsu.buffalo.edu (Danielle T Wei) writes:
>
>> I don't really think asians really care about
>> bilingual education (espeically here in NY), but personally i think any
>> immigrants to the U.S. should learn to speak English first, instead of coming
>> here with no english and trying to change things here..
>
>Well, you'd be excluding a good number of your fellow Chinese who wish
>to become American citizens that way, my dear.

  Including Ms. Danielle T. Wei.  She admits to me that she knew NO ENGLISH
  when she came here.  Now she wants to change things here...
>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: A question for K E N
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 22:06:13 GMT

After a lengthy examination of your posts, I have a question K E N, I need to
become informed. It is to my assumption that your mission here is to inform
those who have not, or are in the need of, becoming informed. In doing this 
K E N, it is logical to assume that you represent pure information, as in order
to be accepted by the uninformed, you must assume a position of omnipotence
otherwise risk your credibility. It is therefore K E N that you must be
completely infallible correct? And because of this infallibility, and 
omnipotence, we, as mere mortals in the face of an all-seeing demi-god, must
feel only humility when we read your posts, correct? Something tells me K E N
that there is an error in either your thinking, or mine. Please inform me...

--The Phantom
Newsgroups: alt.flame,rec.humor
From: krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Where's K e n?
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 02:31:06 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.032531.7365@Princeton.EDU> datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
>
>	Damn, that was too easy getting rid of K e n. I guess he didn't
>have enough information to demolish my last post, so as a public service
>I'll do it for him.

K e n always has information handy whenever it is required, thus
you, sir, are quite misinformed. Your public service has not been
requested, thus it is not required. Your actions are irrelevant.

>	Tep, you have been seriously misinformed about my existence or
>nonexistence. K e n is K e n is K e n, and K e n cannot be otherwise.
>You posted that since K e n cannot be otherwise, he cannot be existant.
>However, that also means that K e n cannot be nonexistant.
>	Ka-BLAMMM!! yourself, dickwad.

Your simulation is in error.

>	Well, so much for that. Pity. I was beginning to enjoy watching
>K e n running for cover. Well, if nobody has anthing else to say, I
>guess I'll be moving on.

K e n does not run for cover, for K e n has no reason to. K e n is
K e n and K e n cannot be anything else but K e n, for K e n is K e n.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Needs No Macros (was Re: Information needed)
Date: 23 Nov 92 15:09:12 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <By10IG.62J@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>tell us, k e n, since you use this phrase verbatim in so many of your posts,
>>do you have a macro for it? or maybe a whole set?
>>
>>Alt 1 K e n is K e n, and you are misinformed
>>
>>Alt 2 Initiate standard washing procedures
>>
>>Alt 3 K e n is K e n, and therefore K e n cannot be boring
>
>K e n has no use for macros such as these, for they are useless and
>irrelevant, sort of like yourself.

K e n, these please answer this question:

Why do you repeat so many phrases verbatim in so many posts? Is it because
your vocabulary is insufficient to allow you to use different verbal
structures to express similar ideas?
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: msmiller@Rational.COM (Mark Miller)
Subject: Re: A Troll Farewell, reply to Miller.
Organization: Rational
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 01:31:09 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.132144.1@jaguar.uofs.edu>, jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
|> In article <1992Nov10.225647.16385@rational.com>, msmiller@Rational.COM (Mark Miller) writes:
|> > In article <1992Nov10.143206.1@jaguar.uofs.edu>, jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
|>   
|> > |> Every time I come here the results are always the same, a few cretins rise to
|> > |> the occasion and I roll right over them just like those tanks rolled over the
|> > |> student protestors in Tiennamen Square.
|> > 
|> > Hmmm ... Duh Twoll has been reading Kevin's stuff again I see.
|>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|> *You are such a clever writer that you managed to seize my willing suspension of
|> disbelief and now I do actually believe that you talk like this.  Well, you
|> being an idiot and all helped to convince me just a teency bit too. :-)

Wake me when you start this flame ... so far you're pretty boring.

|> *I don't read anybody's stuff unless it is a reply to mine, usually.  Of
|> course, the stuff I like reading best is my own, not your digitized excrement.
|> If it weren't for your reply, I'd never even recognize your existence, Mr.
|> Nobody.

Better to be a nobody than a hopeless, brainless, dickless, fuckwitted
dwark such as Duh Twoll whose useless ramblings do little but prove the
unlimited range of human stupidity.

|> 	Also, I can easily understand how a historical and geographcical
|> ignorant such as yourself wouldn't get the Tiennamen Square allusion.  For your
|> own edification, it's in China.  I love being a special educator, because
|> everywhere I go there's a retard like yourself in need of some schooling.

I can easily understand how a shiteating incestual byproduct such
as yourself wouldn't get the similarity in style (and ego) between
your articles and those of Senior Darcy.

|> > You've picked quite the role model.
|> 
|> *You mean I am quite the role model.  Thanx.

*YaWn*

If this is your best material, you should look for a new historical
parallel - but it is hard to imagine a defeat in the annals of history
as total and embarassing as your performance here in a.f.

	-MSM

-- 
________________________________________________________________________
Mark S. Miller                                     msmiller@Rational.COM
"Life is a 4-letter word."                        msmiller@world.std.com
[ insert tedious disclaimer drivel here ]                           IV-Q
From: cress@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Informs Liz As To The Purpose Of A Penis (was Re: K e n Informs Mr. Cress)
Date: 24 Nov 92 04:59:35 GMT
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: discovery.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <By6xHq.4vy@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>In article <1992Nov23.190557.17641@tdb.uu.se> t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:
>>Kenneth J Robinson (krobinso@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu) wrote:
>>: 
>>: No, K e n only uses fingers for such activities. K e n uses K e n's
>>: penis for other activities, which is not a topic of discussion. A penis
>>: was not designed for typing. It's main purpose is copulation. The arousal
>>:
>>Come on, K e n, what other activities, beside ITS main purpose - copulating -
>>are you referring to. I'm impressed, though, that you copulate more often
>>than you take a piss, and still have time to tell people about it on the net.
>
>K e n says that this is not a topic for discussion, thus K e n will
>not discuss it. This is a family-oriented newsgroup.
>
>K e n   R o b i n s o n
===============================================================

Goodness gracious K e n, there's no real reason to be that embarrassed.
Why don't you just come out of the closet and admit to everyone that the real
reason this isn't a topic of discussion is that you are a compulsive wanker.

					the gmeister
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: PORTRAIT OF A NET NEWBIE IDIOT: Mac Bur
Date: 18 Nov 92 15:19:36 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton

In article <1992Nov11.190356.15384@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>, bur@ultisol.gsfc.nasa.gov (MAC) writes:
> samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar "Semen" Samant) writes:
>>[drivel deleted] 
> A tad sub-par for a snot-nosed freshmen.  I think the towel on your head is
> comming loose.  Do go back and do you homework before you try again.
  ^^^^^^^                           ^^^
*Wow, Tushar, you've got him so incoherent that he's making spelling errors.
 Maybe Mac should go do more of his spelling homework, the snot nosed third
 grader.  You should've had mommy proofread before you posted, Mac.

					Troll
> M
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Worthless
Date: 20 Nov 92 22:21:58 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

> cress@endeavor.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress) masturbates then ejaculates:

>						the gmeister
>						get used to it

what, you mean get used to another borng loser with a dumb nickname?

or get used to another asshole with ksu.ksu.edu as your site?

perhaps you and that other snot-nosed kansan tilden can be bigger assholes
than Bruce and Ken, tag-team assholes from penn state