HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks,rec.arts.comics.misc
Date: Mon,  9 Nov 1992 21:32:14 -0500 
From: Adam Darby <ad2n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Casting and X-Men movie
	<1992Nov9.154342.15706@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>

>>Gambit     - (The guy who played Max Headroom)
>The guy is Matt Freyer and once again he's too old.  I suggest Harry
Connick >Jr.
>I mean Gambit IS modled after him.

excellent! excellent! i garowntee that'd work!

>>Nighcrawler- Mandy Potempkin (Inego from Princess Bride)
>Not bad, I would say Jim Carrey (from In Living Color) He can get into 
>the possesions the Kurt could, plus he has the sence of humor (Dennis Miller
>suggessted Jim should play Spider-Man to Stan Lee.  Jim could do ANY McFarlane
>pose.)

excellent! excellent! great choices!

bishop is a tough one...michael jackson has the hair...and the body NOT!
howabout...evander holyfield (if he could act)


_______________________________________________________________________________
_
| if a girl walks in,                    |             adam darby       
      |
| and calls my name in her heart,        |       purest being on earth  
      |
| i'll turn and run away...              |       (and sick of it)       
      |
|----------------------------------------| a.k.a. the Mutation          
      |
|                                        | a.k.a  Ronin   
  the lines have no significance, they are beyond my control...
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
From: smd@hrt216.brooks.af.mil (Sten M. Drescher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: About Uncanny X-Men #296
Date: 10 Nov 92 05:26:44 GMT
Article-I.D.: hrt216.9211100526.AA06767
	<BxGtx9.J0K@ns1.nodak.edu>
Organization: AL/HRTI, Brooks AFB

On 9 Nov 92 20:22:21 GMT, dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu (David Henry) said:

 David> can we? Why, that would ruin the plot! Hey, why don't we bring
 David> back Jean Grey, that Phoenix woman, while we're at it... oops!
 David> Too late!

	Did you pick up on what I did about their escape ploy?  If I
remember correctly (which I may not, since I'm not Obscure Trivia Lad
and I son't have a complete set of all apprearances of Cyclops), wasn't
the only time Jean Grey's TK was powerful enough to hold back Cyke's
optic blasts when she was actually Phoenix?  Personally, I don't think
we need 'Dark Phoenix II' or 'Phoenix vs Phoenix'.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Sten Drescher                  | There are men who seem like more than men.
AL/HRTI                        | Living examples of what we could be if we
Brooks AFB, TX 78235           | tried.  They are men of courage, compassion,
-------------------------------+ and justice.  On the other hand, there are
sdrescher@animal.brooks.af.mil | presidential candidates.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Looking for Marvel Masterpieces promo cards - email with offers.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: jelmore@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jay Elmore)
Subject: Re: Cyclops and Recoil?
Summary: I agree with what he said...
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 92 00:25:58 GMT

A bunch of people said stuff about "how can Cyclops fire beams out of his
head without being thrown back?"
Well, I have to agree with what the other guy said. These are imaginary
characters in a comic book; whether or not someone wants to go through the
trouble of explaining how someone's powers work (i.s., Warren can fly
because of his hollow bones and low fat-to-muscle ratio, whereas Superman
can fly...well...because he's Superman! :D)
Also, with the coming and going of new writers and artists, things will
tend to change or not seem consistent. If the writer wants to explain that
Cyclops doesn't need to touch his visor because he now has a microswitch
on his glove, fine. That's good storytelling (or more often, good
editing). If he doesn't, that's poor storytelling (editing) and he deserves
to be flamed. (See any two consecutive issues of YOUNGBLOOD for examples
of poor storytelling...)
One of the reasons Marvel started the No-Prize so long ago was to allow
readers to gain recognition for creative explanations as to why what might
seem to be a mistake doesn't HAVE to be a mistake. The point is, nine
times out of ten, the perceived mistake is just that: a mistake.
Recently, I've seen readers writing in and saying, in essence, "you
screwed up! on page 4, panel 5, upper left hand corner, you drew Wolverine
with four claws instead of three! I want a No-Prize!"
I could give all the technical reason for my posting as such (wasting
bandwidth, etc.) But in essence, I get tired of seeing these threads
stretched out over 3 weeks, many of them saying the same thing (because
they auto-flame before reading what other people have said... I know, I've
done it also...)
To summarize: I little creativity doesn't hurt; but don't stretch the laws
of rationality too far, please.

This is MY OPINION and should be treated as such.
Sorry to be such a downer...

Jay (=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Thanatos)
Subject: Re: jean, scott, and optic blasts
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 09:25:06 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.180730.3704@news.columbia.edu> jmw20@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Joshua Michael Wolf) writes:
>In article <BxJDCE.o2@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Thanatos) writes:
>>
>Think of the "Can I hold it back" arguement this way.  Cyclops has been needing
>>a power upgrade for a loong time (long by fanboy standards, anyway).  So 
>>Lobdell laid it on the line, and said that he "can pulverize adamantium." 
>>Since Jean can create a field over his eyes, and keep the effect at bay, 
>>ergo her TK is stronger than adamantium.  Boy will wolvie be pissed now.
>>No wonder they created carbonadium...
>>
>Actually, this blooper isn't that hard to explain.  One word: adrenalin.
>Surely, Cyclops must be able, to some extent, to control the power of hi
>blasts- like holding back a punch.  But when he gets real pissed (like when he
>blows up Apocalypse), the adrenalin in his body pumps up his blasts so much
>that they CAN in fact, pulverize adamantium.
>God, I can't believe I just defended Lobdell....
>
Adrenalin?  Heh.  Ha.  HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Sorry...couldn't help it.  Adrenalin would NOT be the solution.  Adamantium can
be DENTED by Thor's HAMMER!  No way could Cyke's beams plow through it, much
less PULVERIZE it.  He meant steel.  

-- 
I don't mind being the smartest	    / Thanatos, DeathUrge, Master of Unknown
man in the world...I just wish it   \ Time and Space tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu 
wasn't this one...	       	    / It's a Zen thing... 
	-Ozymandias 		    \	 you wouldn't understand...  
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: whelal@engr.UVic.CA (Wael  Helal)
Subject: Re: Death's Head II kicks X-men badly
Reply-To: whelal@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 06:30:19 GMT

I read Death's  Head II  a few days ago and he is one powerful hombre. The reason Rogue failed in duplicating his powers is because DH II is experiance of 105 individuals and Rogue couldn't take 105 different personalities at once. So she passed out.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: dlm4731@zeus.tamu.edu (MAREK, DAVID LESLIE)
Subject: Re: XMEN:TAS-load of crap
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 19:21:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.180004.290@ms.uky.edu>, uk08745@nx04.mik.uky.edu (randy j yarger) writes...


My apologies to the intelligence of the people out there.  What I meant to say
in my original post was that STORM's eyes should be blue not brown.  Then, to
go and compound the error earlier today.  For Shame.........I guess I'll have
to punish myself by kneeling in the corner and reading Xforce 1-10 and trying
to understand the story w/o marveling at the art(big time sarcasm there)

Anyway, why don't the Xmen ever use their name when out of uniform(In TAS,
that is)???

Kneeling in Agony,
      Dave
From: aodn307@bongo.cc.utexas.edu (Joshua Henry Geurink)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Cable/Stryfe
Date: 7 Nov 92 18:44:13 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

In article <23647@galaxy.ucr.edu> zeus@watserv.ucr.edu (Zeus) writes:
>
>I've been trying to follow the X-cutioner's discussion sofar. There seem to be>alot of theories out there saying that Stryfe is Cable's future self...or vice>versa... whichever school of thought you come from.  
>The point is though, that there seems to be a flaw here - if you were to travel  
>back in time to meet yourself (or battle yourself...) wouldn't that create one>of those nasty little paradoxes, that would 'blow up the entire universe'  
>(according to the doc in back to the future...)  Whatdayasay, folks?

	Well, Doc was hardly the authority on time travel.  Sure, he MADE a
device, but I doubt he understood EVERYTHING about time-travel theory.  I mean,
look a BTTF (the orig.) -- "Don't tell me ANYTHING about my future -- it would
have DISASTROUS consequences!!!" for example...

	However, I refuse to believe that time is so inflexible as to disallow
the presence of time-travellers.  The past IS the past; by travelling into the
past, you become a part of it, and the goings-on in that period.  Your
presence WON'T change anything; I believe that you'd just assimilate into the 
background and be powerless to change history.
	As for that "blowing up" thought, Doctor Who is a good place to start
examining.  In "Mawdryn Undead," the Brigadier travelling with the Doctor
meets a Brigadier travelling with Tegan and Nyssa.  The two touch, BOOM, and
everyone's lying unconscious on the floor.  The major repercussions:  the
younger Brig (Tegan&Nyssa's) gets a memory block to save his sanity -- just
like what the older Brig was recovering from.  Thus, the younger Brig developed
the block BECAUSE of time-travel -- again, the Doctor's presence did not
rewrite history, but he did PARTICIPATE in it.

=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
King Rat                     |  "You got the power, (Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!)
aka Josh Geurink             |   You got the might, (No Way!)
aodn307@bongo.cc.utexas.edu  |   Get ready for battle, (Give me your money!)
                  Defeat the Black Knight!"
`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`
From: paladin@rajeesh.WPI.EDU (Ever Shifting Bearlike Being...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Rogue's eyes (was Re: XMEN:TAS-load of crap)
Date: 12 Nov 1992 14:45:26 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: rajeesh.wpi.edu

In article <1992Nov12.051242.19449@news.columbia.edu> ejs16@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Eric Jaron Stieglitz) writes:
>In article <11NOV199209514441@zeus.tamu.edu> dlm4731@zeus.tamu.edu (MAREK, DAVID LESLIE) writes:
>>
>>I looked at my Giant Size Xmen yesterday and it says that Rogue's eyes are
>>blue.  Since it was the first issue with Rogue, I'm taking it as the way
>>that they should be, not what others have done since.
>
>Rogue first appeared in X-Men with issue #158 (this is where Carol Danvers 
>travels to the Pentagon to erase some files and runs into the Brotherhood
>of Evil Mutants. Since Rogue destroyed Danver's life, they slug it out).
>She joined the X-Men in issue #171. Giant Size X-Men makes no reference to
>Rogue. In fact, I'm pretty sure that Marvel didn't create her until a number
>of years later. BTW, her eyes are green, except when the colorist screws up.
>

yup... unless the colorist screws up... but then again.. he could be referring
to the avengers anual #7 which was her frist appearance... that was somtime in
1980 or 81... which was stil a long while after the giant sized x-men...

but rather than relying on various things that SAY what color her eyes are..
why don't you look at most any uncanny x-men or x-men that has her in it..
i can think of one notable exception to her eyes being green... that was in
#239? (or thereabouts) when carol was in control and her eyes were blue...
which i believe is the color of carol danvers' eyes...

but an overwhelmingly large amount of the time her eyes are green... and
if you were to look in the marvel universe comics (the ones that list all the 
heroes with pictures and stats..) that says green eyes too...

 Paladin (ever shifting bearlike being....)	     
     Reality	       | " Wouldn't you laugh if your head exploded???  
 		       |	 No.... I guess you wouldn't.....	 
 paladin@wpi.wpi.edu   |   I would."   (Nosage, June 91)
From: lazarus@goldwing.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Some Excalibur #60 comments-minor SPOILERS
Date: 9 Nov 1992 00:42:14 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: goldwing.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <1992Nov9.043737.18832@nmsu.edu>, bgrubb@dante.nmsu.edu (GRUBB) writes:

This really isn't much of a spoiler, so I cut out LOTS of blank space...

>Kitty has refined her phasing power to the point of being both solid(hand)
>and phased(head).  Question: has she healed yet and if so when did it happen?

She had refined this aspect of her power... phasing only a part of her
body... long before the Mutant Massacre.  In this instance, though, I'd
suspect that she's using it in reverse, concentrating on making her hand
solid while staying phased.  Which means that, although they've never
actually said that she's fully healed yet, I pesonally don't believe
that she is...

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
'Cats - 22, Iowa State - 13  A K-State win on national television... and a win
	that I'm satisfied with!  :)
"I'm confused... did I vote, or did I just buy candy?" -- David Letterman
From: jchiu@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (James Chiu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: X-Men, Animated Series
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:07:58 GMT
Organization: Virginia Tech Computer Science Dept, Blacksburg, VA

> Speaking of Rogue, I hope they start doing better with HER powers... to
> where she can do more than just "absorb the strength of anyone I touch".
> Also, it shoulda knocked Wolvie cold...
> 
It seems that Rogue doesn't need more power than "absorb the strength"
She looks extremely powerful with her invulnerability especially
when the sentinel slammed its fist sending Rogue onto the floor on her face.

She's just like Superman with the strength and invulnerability-I guess
that absorbing the strength would be a good addition to her powers.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: jelmore@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jay Elmore)
Subject: Re: About a mile off topic.
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 21:23:56 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.180929.5905@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca> p0g3@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Chris G. Galbraith) writes:
>
>-- 
>Thus Sayth The Crazy Kid,   | "The silence, the terror, the pain
>C. Chris G. Galbraith       | and horror as your mom comes downstairs."
>p0g3@jupiter.csd.unb.ca     |         -Barenaked Ladies
>p0g3@unbnov3.csd.unb.ca     | "Peacemaker Die!" -- EXTREME III


I'll say!

Jay (=
From: jchiu@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (James Chiu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: X-men TAS -- More errors?
Date: 9 Nov 92 17:58:57 GMT
Organization: Virginia Tech Computer Science Dept, Blacksburg, VA

ter5424@ritvax.isc.rit.edu (T-Dub - SGP '92) writes:
> In article <92314.011910WRS114@psuvm.psu.edu>, Bill Simoni <WRS114@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> >Two more errors(?) that myself and friends seemed to notice during part 2.
> >
> >1) During the scene with Scott at the house of Jubilee's foster parents.
> >Isn't he wearing normal sunglasses and not ruby quartz.  This is probably
> >just a coloring error as they have it right in scenes before and after.
> >
> 
> Yep, it was a coloring error.  It took me a minute to figure out that that
> *was* Cyclops.  I kept saying to myself, "It looks like Cyclops, but it can't
> be because he doesn't have his correct glasses on"......
> 
>                                               Theron
Yeah, it took me a while to figure out that was Cyclops.  I thought at
first it was on of those Feds who supervises the sentinels at first.
He had the same glasses as the one Cyclops was wearing in Jubilee's home.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: vcf1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Victoria C Fike)
Subject: Re: The X-Men Movie Cast (Repost from racm)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 18:14:47 GMT
Reply-To: vcf1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Victoria C Fike)
X-Posted-From: cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <83418@ut-emx.uucp> nova@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jennifer Baughman) writes:
>In article <83283@ut-emx.uucp> chunger@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Chung-Mau Cheng) writes:
>
>>Idealistic Cast:
>>
>>Colossus: Arnold Schwarzenneger (Height? Height?!! He's about 6"4' last I
>>	recalled!!!)
>
>Works!

Hm, well, not really.  I agree with the people who said Arnold isn't young/
innocent enough.

>>Wolverine: Mel Gibson. I was watching Lethal Weapon one day and...
>>	(If the argument is height, they can always use ramps a la Rambo movies.)

It's been a while since I saw Lethal Weapon etc., but Mel Gibson is rather 
short, no?  Perfect for Wolvie.

>Agreed.  I think Mel Gibson would make a WONDERFUL Wolvie!

No argument here. :-)

>>Cyclops: Harrison Ford (Maybe. I have yet to think of someone more
>>suitable. But,
>>	I think we can all agree that he CAN act.)
>
>He can act, and he enjoys the action roles...However, I think that Kevin
>Costner's more introverted acting style is more suited to Cyclops.

True 'nuff.

>>Rogue: I've never seen her act before, but one of my friends suggested Mary
>>	Stewart Masterson (I think that's her name. She was in Fried Green
>>	Tomatoes.)
>
>Personally, I like Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio.  She even has the long, wavy,
>flowing hair!

I stopped reading the X-titles a while back, but I thought Rogue had *short*
hair...?

>>Magneto: Rutger Hauer, without a question. Well, one. My friend suggests:
>>Sabertooth: Rutger Hauer. Not as good as Mags, IMHO, but workable.
>>(Watch the end
>>	fight scene in Blade Runner)
>
>Rutger Hauer as Sabretooth I can live with.  But as Magneto?   NOOOOOOOO!  I 
>have my own pet actor for Mags...Sean Connery!

H'm.  I could see Rutger Hauer as either one.  (Skeptics about him as Sabre-
tooth:  watch Split Second, which came out this summer.)

>Ummmm...the guy who played Sallah in the Indy films as the Shadow King?
>(Sorry I can't remember his name, but...)

John Rhys-Davies.  He'd work--but I can't see them using Shadow King in the 
flick.

Tori

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Victoria C. Fike                     |  "I heard a murmuring in the night
vcf1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu          |   Black swords hanging cold as ice
Lurking Girl of the LNH              |   Will they take me to Paradise?"
LNH:  We *almost* saved r.a.c...     |      --Hawkwind, "Song of the Swords"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: caw@gtech.com (Christopher A. White)
Subject: Re: Paradoxes
Organization: GTECH Corporation, West Greenwich, RI
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 18:53:03 GMT

In article <1dd2koINNrtt@bigboote.WPI.EDU> mikecap@wpi.WPI.EDU (Michael Vince Caprio Jr) writes:
>
>In response to the previous articles:
>
>When I mentioned the concept of "you" this referred to the sum total of all
>the particles that you consist of now.  Period.  These particles have always
>existed, therefore "you" have always existed.  I'm sure everyone's heard how
>particles of Julius Ceasar may be a part of us now... no?  Atoms are not 
>generally created or destroyed on this planet under natural conditions.  The
>only places that such nuclear reactions take place are on a star, during 
>radioactive decay, or in a reactor. 

Unfortunately, we do not know that that is true anymore. Generally, at a 
quantum level, conservation has been completely chucked. 

Just nit picking,


Topher
-- 
 Christopher A. White                    | 
 caw@gtech.com                           | Free will is largely overrated. 
 GTech Corporation, West Greenwich, RI   | 
 The opinions expressed are mine alone   |           - Topher
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: X-men TAS -- More errors?
From: Bill Simoni <WRS114@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 01:19:10 EST
Organization: Penn State University

Two more errors(?) that myself and friends seemed to notice during part 2.

1) During the scene with Scott at the house of Jubilee's foster parents.
Isn't he wearing normal sunglasses and not ruby quartz.  This is probably
just a coloring error as they have it right in scenes before and after.

2) Also Cyclops (plus the rest of them, I suppose).  He was taking the
Snetinels out way too easily.  They had to have killed 15 in that episode.
In "real life" (the comic), put just a handful against the X-men and our
heroes would be toast.

Just MHO.

__________________________
Bill Simoni
wrs114@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: stevenra@feserve.cc.purdue.edu (Alex Stevens)
Subject: Re: X-Men TAS new info
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 23:37:15 GMT

In article <BxCw5G.Asq@news.cso.uiuc.edu> mlj44080@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Michael Lee Jacobs) writes:
>Just saw "night of the Sentinels II" and thought it was handled nicely.
>No spoilers, but there are some very nice "camera angles" on this one
>and they handle a major plot point very well considering it is a kids
>show.
>
>	Unfortunately (besides now having Stan Lee doing guest announcing
>for X-men previews during other show's credits)  this WAS JUST A PREVIEW!

	Good, now maybe they'll save money and redo the animation right!

Is it me or has animation (U.S.) gone to the shitter as of late (past 5 years)?
Alex
stevenra@feserve.cc.purdue.edu
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: How many NATHANS are there?
Date: 10 Nov 92 16:25:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: njitgw.1992Nov10.162553.15372
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <BxHELo.GGC@ns1.nodak.edu> dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu (David Henry) writes:
>While in complete sympathy with that statement, that stupid line by Bishop
>in the latest X-Cutioner's Song (how he used to "hide from Nimrods") leads
>credence, alas, to Ernie's belief (FuturePast leads to Bishopworld).
>
>I'll still hold that the differences seem strong enough that I'll need more
>than a one line from a time-twisted character to prove to me that *the*
>FuturePast of X-Men #141 leads to Bishopworld, and not just a coincidence
>that there are things called "Nimrod" that hunt mutants in more than one
>closely-allied alternate timelines...
>
>Hhh. Once again, I stand back and just wait for the silly books to fill in
>the gaps...

Aha!  Obscure Trivia Lad is here to help!  There are also going to be
Nimrods in the mainstream timeline!  In the issues of UX-Men with Master
Mold/Nimrod (the ones where MM/N, along with Rogue, got sent into the
Seige Perilous - which I'm sure ticked David off to no end), Senator
Kelly's wife was killed.  The X-Men were there to witness this, but
couldn't do anything to save her.  Kelly, was, naturally, slightly
upset over this, and agreed to supply funding for a Project: Nimrod.
So, if Nimrods can exists in two separate and disctinct timestreams,
why not three?

-- 
Brian Perler			bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu
Obscure Trivia Lad of the Legion of Net.Heroes
"I wanna decide who lives and who dies"
	-Crow T. Robot, "Santa Claus Conquers the Martians," MST3K