HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 02:30:07 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: watterson@stsci.edu (Mike Watterson)
Subject: RE: that REDSKIN THING
Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 11:24:39 GMT

In article <1gf2jcINNo0c@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>, pele@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (David J. Duffield) writes:
> 
> But isn't it annoying?
> 
> --David
> 
Yes it is, and I'm a Redskin fan!!!!
-- 
*******************************************************************
* Mike Watterson                         | watterson@stsci.edu    *
* Space Telescope Science Institute      | (410) 338-5052 (voice) *
* 3700 San Martin Drive                  | (410) 338-5075 (fax)   *
* Baltimore, Maryland 21218              |                        *
*******************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 00:20:15 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 23:00:17 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 01:00:05 GMT
Subject: Re: Tim Harris -- Rootin' Tootin' 9'er
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro

>I think I'm pleased that such hypocricy is in San Francisco where it
>belongs.

Bite me.
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Skins/Eagles
Keywords: dem saints
Date: 11 Dec 92 22:48:02 GMT
Organization: .

Jeff Comer writes:
>
>As for Gibbs, well yes, remember that this man's nickname is Mr. December.
>He has a knack for getting wins late in the season. At some point a few
>years ago, he had some incredibly high winning percentage in December, up
>over .750.
>
>As for contenders, I think any of the NFC playoff teams have a good chance.
>Philly beat Dallas once, edged Minnesota, and nearly beat the 9'ers. The 
>Skins won at the HHH Dome earlier (by a hair), and should have beaten the
>Saints.                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 ^^^^^^
Exsqueeze me?  Did you watch the same game I did?  The score was 20-3. 
If it weren't for the typical long-but-fruitless first-half drives by 
the Saints, this one would have been out of reach by halftime.  Of course, 
it was anyway.  The Skins have obviously reclaimed some offense, but 
there was _NO_ sign of it that Monday night.

>
>-JC
>The NFL Mad Man.

I'll say.

--J.J.
(worship Kevin Greene, and his dog)
From: GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullivan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Watters status????
Date: 16 Dec 1992 22:59:20 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <1992Dec17.012232.2156@leland.Stanford.EDU>,
daveshao@leland.stanford.edu (David Shao) writes:
>In article <102370@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
>>
>>Watters is still complaining of sores.  But why start him and risk further
>>injury?  Amp Lee has done a great job gaining over 100 yards against a D
>>which has not allowed a 100-yard rusher all season.  A backfield of Watters
>>AND Lee... hmm, now that should give defensive coordinators fits through the
>>playoffs.
>
>The 49ers would not for a moment think of this backfield combination this
>year, or any year in which Tom Rathman is a 49er.  Rathman is one of the
>finest fullbacks in the league, and the perfect fullback for the
>Walsh offense.  An essential weapon of the Walsh offense is the sweep

absolutely correct.  Any offense that leaves Rathman on the bench is
going to be worse off.

>Lee ran well in the game at Minnesota, but we must remember that
>this game was played indoors on artificial turf.  He looked much less
>impressive at Candlestick on a wet natural grass field.  The final

You could also say that the game at Candlestick was the rooks first
start and he learned his lesson by the second game.  The stuff I
heard say that Lee was all ears in the huddle in both those games
listening to what the Linemen had to say to him.  Give him lots of
credit for listening.  He's for real.

>49er games of the season will all be at Candlestick up through the
>NFC championship if they make it that far.  I doubt that Lee will be the
>49er halfback of the future.  In the Philadelphia game I saw him
>tackled in a manner quite similar to how defenses would stop Dexter
>Carter--one defender would hit Lee and Lee would be stopped cold.

There isn't a running back in the league who doesn't get stopped
cold by a good defender.  Watters has been stopped hard quite a few
times.  I've also seen him break tackles.  I'm pretty impressed with
his ability to hang on to the ball in traffic.  That is REALLY
important in the Niners scheme.

(rest of Watters vs. Lee vs. Carter deleted)

The lesson to be learned from watching Lee in action is not the
incremental differences in Watters vs. Lee.  The offensive line is
doing a super job, maybe the best in the league - that's the lesson.
Carter did well in his short appearances this year too.  Either
Watters or Lee are good enough for the Niners to win Super Bowl.  I
think Watters at 100% is better than Lee, but Lee is better than a
less than 100% Watters and that is why they are giving him lots of
time to get healthy.

>give up a fumble in a crucial situation.

Cmon, that could happen anyway to anybody or have you already
forgotten the NFC championship game with the Giants a few years ago?

Mike
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: Why do the 49ers get to play by different rules???!!!
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:39:13 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.042413.1386@serval.net.wsu.edu> jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer) writes:

>In article <1992Dec13.224936.24890@netcom.com> mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:

>>In article <1992Dec13.201510.26638@serval.net.wsu.edu> jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer) writes:

>>>It is now early 2nd half in the 49ers-Vikes game and I'm about to rip the TV
>>>set from the wall.  First, we need a QB!  Is there any chance that we'll
>>>be able to draft a decent one?  We do get draft picks this year, right?
>>>Second, I haven't really paid much attention to all of the complaints about
>>>the favoritism shown to the 49ers by the officials, but this is unbelievable!
>>>[additional ranting deleted...]

>>Chill out, dude.  Blaming the refs is such a weenie thing to do.

>I like the way you conveniently left out my very next sentence in the above
>paragraph... the one where I specifically stated that I was not blaming the
>loss on the calls, but that I was just *sick* of the calls (and I still am...
>I was venting a little frustration).  Then after deleting it, you accuse me
>of blaming the refs... well, I guess I am blaming the refs... blaming them
>for being pathetic, but not for the loss as you imply.

I deleted about sixty lines of invective.  I do NOT edit other posts to
take people's statements out of context.  And your original post sure
hinted that you thought that their incompetence led to the Vikings loss.
Sorry if that was an incorrect interpretation.
-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: horn@tegan.jsc.nasa.gov (Mark Horn)
Subject: Re: What is a "Packer"? Viking fan wants to know
Organization: NASA Johnson Space Center
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:00:32 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.195725.10877@data-io.com> dietz@parody.Data-IO.COM (Kent Dietz) writes:
>Also, why was Green Bay 
>chosen as a NFL site?  
>What population base is drawn from? Milwaukie and ...?

I think it has more to do with the fact that the Green Bay Packers are one of
the oldest football teams there is (are they THE oldest?)  Anyway they've
always been a part of football and they've always been in Green Bay.

Another important fact is that the city of Green Bay owns the Green Bay
Packers.  As far as I know, this is a unique situation in the NFL.  I doubt
that they'll ever sell the team to another city.  

The result?  The Green Bay Packers have always been, and as far as anyone can
see, they alwyays will be based in the NFL's smallest city.

- sparkie
horn@mickey.jsc.nasa.gov

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 04:00:08 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
From: jdng90@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Gorsuch JDN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The Dynasty Continues..........
Date: 14 Dec 92 14:27:07 GMT

In <mbb2001-041292212351@m248-102.bgsu.edu> mbb2001@andy.bgsu.edu (Mark B. Benintendi) writes:


>the best all around team with the best players to run over every team that

  the 9ers D is something like #25 against the pass, the best all
around? 

>they play during the season.  Yes, we do sound like arogant 49er spoiled
>brat fans.  We have reason to be, since the 49ers spoil us by winning all
>the time. 
 
  the 9ers are 11-2 (?), winning ALL the time ? 

>I love it when you call us the whiners when the 49ers lose.  We
>do not know what else to do since the 49ers never lose.  
                                             ^^^^^ 
                                          see above, same comments.

>experience to us.  Their is no better team than the 49ers.  The Niners lose
>the best QB of all time, lose the best FS of all time, lose one of the best
>RB of all time, two great MLB, three great SS, our best pass rusher, and
>they still reign as the greatest super power in the NFL. 

  This is highly subjective, Rice,Montana,Lott best of all time,
probably, Craig ? Good, a fine pass catcher, not quite in the
Payton/Brown/Juice catogary.

>Those are just
>the players lost in the last three years.  We would not want to rub it in
>any more by mentioning all the great players lost in the last decade when
>the Dynasty began by forming the greatest secondary of all time.  if
>anybody would like to challenge our thoughts on the best team of all time,
   
  I agree with you here, the 1980's 9ers were probably the best team of
all time, about the 90's 9ers - the jury is still out (for another
8 years) 

>all the power to you.  In the end we will win as the 49ers always do.
                                                            ^^^^^^ 
                                               some guys never learn. 
 


>                                      The Adventures of
>                                           Mark
>                                              And
>                                                 Brian
>                                   
   Jon - a niners fan who is not afraid to face facts. 

 (N.B. after seeing SF play at Wembley in the Summer, I was impressed
with Watters, I remember thinking: ' On any other team he would be a 
fine addition to their running game, at SF, he will BE their running 
game.) 
 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pboxrud@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul D Boxrud)
Subject: Re: Packers win at Houston
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 13:58:27 GMT

Is it just me or did Terrel Buckley actually make tackles.  He even forced a 
fumble.  Maybe not returning punts has something to do with that.  Sure did 
feel nice not having him returning punts.

About the Dallas play.  I also got the impression that E. Smith tried to fumble
the ball out of the endzone.  Strange thing to do when you're up by 4 points.  
I'm getting a bad feeling about this having to depend on other teams to win.  
Brings back bad memories.

Go Pack!
Go Steelers!
Go Redskins! (at least don't tie!)

Paul
From: cca23@keele.ac.uk (Neil Carter)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Seahawks Mailing List
Keywords: seahawks seattle
Date: 17 Dec 92 17:26:00 GMT
Distribution: uk
Organization: Keele University, England


I emailed the person who set up the Seahawks mailing list (Amsel?), but
it hasn't appeared to have got through and I've lost hisr address.
If you read this please add me to the mailing list and send me a confirmation

email address is: cca23@uk.ac.keele

Thanks 
Neil Carter
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: watterson@stsci.edu (Mike Watterson)
Subject: Re: WASHINGTON SUCKS SHIT!!!
Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 05:51:23 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.224951.7252@nmsu.edu>, wlittle@dante.nmsu.edu (Wes) writes:
> I just have to get this off of my chest:  The Washington Redskins are
> the shittiest sorriest piece of shit excuse for an NFL football team I
> have ever seen.  They usually are the luckiest team who seems to get
> all the FUCKING REFS calling the game for them!!  They won yesterday
> against Dallas but everyone knows that the BEST team DID NOT win...
> That was a fucking incomplete pass..Aikman's arm was going forward!!!
> Even if it was a fumble Emitt was fucking down on a knee!!!  AT the
> very very most it was a Safety!!!  Which means Dallas still wins...
> I must say though that Aikman did throw a shitty pass to put Dallas
> in the situation to begin with.  But Dallas' Defense did as they did
> all day and stuffed those fucking Redskins at the 3 yardline!!!  So
> the Refs seeing that there favorite fucking shit team might lose
> decided to take the game into there own hands....! I know I am a
> baby!!1
> 
> I admit it....but I just hate to see the best team lose on a fucked up
> Call.!!  Flame away all you shit head Redskin fans because you know in
> your heart who the better team is...and it will be proven in the
> Playoffs!! You also know in your heart that that call was
> BULLSHIT@!!@@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 
> Wes

Wes,

  What a potty mouth!  I wouldn't say you are a baby, but get a grip :-)
-- 
*******************************************************************
* Mike Watterson                         | watterson@stsci.edu    *
* Space Telescope Science Institute      | (410) 338-5052 (voice) *
* 3700 San Martin Drive                  | (410) 338-5075 (fax)   *
* Baltimore, Maryland 21218              |                        *
*******************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro