HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jonas@beor.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Josef Nelissen)
Subject: Paris final/Oakland semifinal results
Organization: Rechnerbetrieb Informatik  /  RWTH Aachen
Date:  9 Nov 92 06:43:30 GMT

Paris
-----

final: Boris Becker(9) d. Guy Forget(11) 7:6 6:3 3:6 6:3

doubles: John McEnroe/Pat McEnroe d. Gailbraith/Visser 6:4 6:2

Oakland
-------

Monica Seles(1) d. Anke Huber(3) 6:2 6:3
Martina Navratilova(2) d. Katerina Maleeva(4) 6:1 6:2


Comments & News
---------------
- Big win for Becker who played pretty well against the defending champ.
  Boris was only broken once in the tournament, which caused the loss of
  the third set. Forget actually wasn't playing bad (his face after the match
  looked like: I've tried all I can do but didn't succeed) and was
  heavily supported by the french crowd, but Becker IMHO seems to regain
  his old strength. In fact he commented on his game against Ivanisevic as
  perhaps the fifth or sixth best in his career.

  According to the german commentator Becker will with a 99.99% security
  participate in the ATP final at Frankfurt.

- Andre Agassi has withdrawn from the tournament in Antwerpen because of
  injury, so he definitely won't participate in Frankfurt
-- 
Josef Nelissen, Lehrstuhl fuer Angewandte Mathematik, insbesondere Informatik,
RWTH-Aachen, Ahornstr. 55, W-5100 Aachen, Germany, Tel. +49 241/80-21060,
FAX +49 241/80-21079, e-mail jonas@beor.informatik.rwth-aachen.de
* To know everything would be impractical. The access time would be enormous. *
From: cappiell@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Steven Cappiello)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Ivanisevic's boasting
Date: 6 Nov 92 18:10:43 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

>
|>>   previously, bad for tennis.  I am awed by but have no admiration
>>   for 130 mph serves.
>

	What's the matter?  Afraid of a little serve?

>>3. This is what bugs me the most: Because he is Croatian, he's
>>   got a group of flag-waving Croatian entourage cheering wildly for
>>   him at important matches.  It's as if he's out there fighting
>>   against the world for his country, which is actually engaged in a
>>   brutal (civil) war.  I don't like to see flag-waving except at


	What is wrong with flag-waving.  Their relatives are at home
	dying.  If mine were dying here in the U.S., and the rest of the
	world ignored the atrocities, I would certainly take any and every
	opportunity to bring it to the world's attention.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: mmmirash@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (Mandar M. Mirashi)
Subject: Re: Becker routs Ivanisevic!!!
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 22:46:20 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

In article <1992Nov8.153016.12490@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung) writes:
>
>Exactly. I also hope that people in this group behave like adults
>and post with maturity. There really is no need to post a "Becker
>is the greatest" type article every time he wins a match. Just imagine
>Becker, Edberg, Lendl, Courier, Sampras, Seles, Graf, Sabatini fans
>all do that, this group would be a very busy place. :-)
>-- 
>-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
>     HR 1A-304, AT&T Bell Labs, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ, 07748 USA

Shun, I was hitting back at all the critics who seemed to relish the fact
that Becker was having a bad time. And speaking of fans, wasn't this
newsgroup deluged by articles from Agassi fans when he won Wimbledon??

Go BOOM BOOM!

                                                    From a diehard Becker fan
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Space the final frontier" - Star Trek.
"Try to see it my way, only time will tell if I am right or I am wrong"
                                                         - The Beatles
From: jeff.kling@brent.uucp (Jeff Kling) 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: WHY WOULD SOME RACQUETS B
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:54:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Brentwood BBS Harrison, NY  914-835-7898
Reply-To: jeff.kling@brent.uucp (Jeff Kling) 

-> The properties of a tennis racquet that will affect the speed of the
-> ball after impact are most likely its weight distribution and its
-> string tension. Therefore the trick behind the widebody design is
-> simply by making the head thicker, more weight is concentrated in the
-> head, hence more momentum gathered during the swing and more momentum
-> transferred to the ball upon impact.
->
-> If this is true, why would they call the widebody a 'revolution'?
-> Can't they add a few grams to the head of any old racquets instead of
-> selling the widebody with twice the price?

There is also the matter of stiffness.  A widebody can be designed to be
considerably stiffer than a conventional racquet.  And you are
generalizing above with the "make head thicker."  I have a widebody and
the thickest part is at the bottom of the loop and then tapers to 23mm
at the tip.  The width, and stiffness, is concentrated right at the
throat, greatly enhancing the STABILITY of the racquet.  A widebody
makes it much easier for a beginner to pick up the game and start
enjoying it and playing well in a greatly reduced time over conventional
beam designs.

And there is the matter of materials as well.  Graphite over wood and
more recently such things as twaron (whatever that is), kevlar and
carbon fiber, which can all be used to enhance stiffness while reducing
weight.

Try demoing a bunch of different widebodies and see for yourself.  There
is nothing like experimentation to illustrate the point.  And, Hey,
Jimmy C. uses a widebody... as do just about all of the women players.
I think Agassi uses one (or is it just oversized?).  Well... point made
anyway.  Any other takers?
From: gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM (Gess Shankar)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Tournament Update: November 12 am
Date: 12 Nov 92 15:28:28 GMT
Article-I.D.: knex.66T5TB1w165w
Organization: Knowledge Exchange, GA, US of A

$150,000 INDIANAPOLIS TENNIS CLASSIC
AT INDIANAPOLIS 
WEDNESDAY'S RESULTS  
THIRD ROUND
----------
Shi-Ting Wang d. Anke Huber (1), 6-2,6-3     <--- Unheard of Women's Tennis!
Iva Majoli d. Nathalie Tauziat (2), 6-3,6-3
Katerina Maleeva (3) d. Chanda Rubin, 6-1,6-2
Helena Sukova (4) d. Angelica Gavaldon, 7-6 (9-7), 6-4
Linda Harvey-Wild d. Katrina Adams, 6-4,6-1

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

$350,000 VIRGINIA SLIMS OF PHILADELPHIA
AT PHILADELPHIA
WEDNESDAY'S RESULTS  
FIRST ROUND
-----------
Natalia Zvereva d. Ros Fairbank, 6-2,7-5
Gigi Fernandez d. Larisa Savchenko, 7-5,6-4

SECOND ROUND
------------
Gabriela Sabatini (2) d. Pam Shriver, 7-6 (7-4), 7-5
Arantxa Sanchez (3) d. Amanda Coetzer, 7-6 (7-5), 7-6 (7-3)
Jennifer Capriati (4) d. Elise Burgin, 6-2,6-0
Conchita Martinez (5) d. Zina Garrison, 4-6,6-3,6-4
Lisa Raymond d. Amy Frazier (7), 6-4,6-4

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

$1.1 MILLION EUROPEAN COMMUNITY CHAMPIONSHIP
AT ANTWERP, BELGIUM
WEDNESDAY'S RESULTS  
SECOND ROUND
------------
Michael Chang (2) d. Todd Woodbridge, 6-1,6-2
Richard Krajicek (6) d. Grant Connell, 6-3,6-4
FIRST ROUND
-----------
Ivan Lendl (4) d. Paul Haarhuis, 7-5,6-1
Guy Forget (8) d. Rick Leach, 6-7 (6-8), 7-5,6-2
John McEnroe d. Bart Wuyts, 6-2,6-2
Michael Stich d. Sergi Bruguera, 7-6 (7-3), 3-6,7-6 (9-7)
Gabriel Markus d. Thomas Muster, 6-3,7-6 (7-4)
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

$348,000 KREMLIN CUP
AT MOSCOW
WEDNESDAY'S RESULTS  
SECOND ROUND
------------
Karel Novacek (1) d. Markus Zoecke, 6-3,6-1
Andrei Medvedev (3) d. Olivier Delaitre, 6-3,6-3
Carl-Uwe Steeb (5) d. Nicklas Kulti, 6-2,6-3
Cedric Pioline (6) d. Richey Reneberg, 4-6,6-0,7-6 (7-1)
Marc Rosset (8) d. Jeremy Bates, 6-4,6-4
Christo van Rensburg d. Mikael Stadling, 6-4,7-5
Gilad Bloom d. Jan Siemerink, 3-6,6-3,6-4

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Many others are posting results of tournaments, so I will stop posting
the results to avoid wasting bandwidth. I will continue to post the
ranking and money leader lists every Monday.

Cheers and kill that toad across the net, as Vic Braden likes to say... ;-)
--
 GeSS                  |<><>|              /===/==//==/===/             |<><>|
|<><>|                 |<><>|             /---/--//--/---/              |<><>|
gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM |<><>|            /===/==//==/===/               |<><>|
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: "kwansik kim" <kkim@thresher.cs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Main/Cross string tension difference
Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 21:32:18 -0500


I'm sure "main/cross string" is the right term but you know
some people string their vertical and horizontal string with
different tension. Does this kind of stringing have some 
benefit ?  I'm trying to lower the tension this time since
my groundies flies short constantly. I strung my Pro Staff
Classic with 58 lbs. If I go lower,I might be losing considerable
amount of control. Thus I'm basically hoping that stringing
cross/main differently might be the way I go. 


Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: csmith@cc.gatech.edu (Christopher Smith)
Subject: News, Nov 13
Organization: Software Research Center, Georgia Tech
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 12:38:50 GMT


Tournament Results:

  + Antwerp
    -------
    Korda(3) d. J. McEnroe            6-4 6-4
    Forget(8) d. Markus               6-4 6-3

    P. McEnroe/Palmer d. Jones/Leach(2)           6-3 6-1
    Nijssen/Suk(4) d. Chang/J. Sanchez            6-2 6-3


  + Moscow
    ------
    Medvedev(3) d. van Rensberg       7-6 0-6 6-2
    Cherkasov(4) d. Wheaton           6-4 7-6
    Rosset(8) d. Kafelnikov (Russia)  6-7 6-3 7-6
    Hlasek d. Schapers                6-7 7-5 6-3

    Grabb/Reneberg(1) d. Bloom/M. Daniel          7-5 3-6 7-6


  + Sao Paulo
    ---------
    Yzaga(2) d. Baur                  7-6 7-6
    Mattar(6) d. Adams                3-6 7-6 6-2


  + Philadelphia
    ------------
    QF's:
    Graf(1) d. Martinez(5)            6-1 6-1
    Sabatini(2) d. Raymond            6-4 7-6

    G. Fernandez/Zvereva(2) d. McNeil/Schultz     7-6 6-2

    2nd Round:
    Zvereva d. Pierce(6)              7-6 6-2
    McNeil(8) d. G. Fernandez         6-2 7-5

    Today's QF matchups: McNeil(8) vs. Capriati(4) and 
                         Zvereva vs. Sanchez Vicario(3)


  + Indianapolis
    ------------
    K. Maleeva(3) d. Gildemeister(6)  6-0 6-2
    Sukova(4) d. Whitlinger           6-2 6-2
    Harvey-Wild(7) d. Majoli          4-6 6-2 6-4
    Shi-ting Wang d. Kochta (Ger.)    7-6 1-6 7-5
    



Other News:

  + The ATP faces legal action after they refused to allow Belgian
    officials to conduct random drug tests prior to the ECC Antwerp
    tournament (Belgian law gives officials that right).  There is
    some question as to whether the ECC tournament will remain a
    sanctioned ATP tournament.


  + It looks like Hlasek and Rosset will after all participate in the
    Davis Cup finals; they earlier were threatening to withdraw from
    representing Switzerland.  The longtime coach of the Swiss
    Davis Cup team (Roland Stadler) has resigned in a political dispute
    with the players and other members of the Swiss Tennis Federation.


..Chris

-- 
Christopher Smith                          csmith@cc.gatech.edu
College of Computing (Room 269)                                  
Georgia Tech, Atlanta GA 30332-0280        404/853-0937
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: mbosch@mcs213c.cs.umr.edu (Michael Bosch)
Subject: Re: Becker routs Ivanisevic!!!
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 06:45:07 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla

I have only one thing to say Mandar Mirashi about this so-called
"BOOM BOOM TIME!".  WHY DON'T YOU GET A LIFE!
And your accusation about all Agassi fans posting after his Wimbledon
win, untrue.  Look back at the traffic on this group after Becker wins
a few matches in a row and compare it to when Agassi wins and I think 
you'll see quite a difference in the number.         

Just another group member tired of seeing these Becker posts.

Mike Bosch
From: mliu@garden.csc.calpoly.edu (Mei-Ling L. Liu)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Ivanisevic's boasting
Date: 7 Nov 92 04:22:28 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, UCSB

In article <96497@netnews.upenn.edu> cappiell@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Steven Cappiello) writes:
>>  (From my original posting)
>|>>   previously, bad for tennis.  I am awed by but have no admiration
>>>   for 130 mph serves.
>	What's the matter?  Afraid of a little serve?
>
Yes, 130 mph serves CAN kill.  To me, it adds nothing to the game 
but subtracts from it.  I believe there are others who think likewise,
but of course you are entitled to your opinion.  It's a free country.
>>>3. This is what bugs me the most: Because he is Croatian, he's
>>>   got a group of flag-waving Croatian entourage cheering wildly for
>>>   him at important matches.  It's as if he's out there fighting
>>>   against the world for his country, which is actually engaged in a
>>>   brutal (civil) war.  I don't like to see flag-waving except at
>
>	What is wrong with flag-waving.  Their relatives are at home
>	dying.  If mine were dying here in the U.S., and the rest of the
>	world ignored the atrocities, I would certainly take any and every
>	opportunity to bring it to the world's attention.
The headline of an article in today's L.A. Times says: "Croatia Accused of
Complicity in Serb 'Cleansing' of Muslims".  War or no war, a sports
event is not the right forum for political demonstration.  Besides, in
this case, I think they don't want outside interference!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~                                 * * * * *                   ~           
~ M. Liu                        * * * * * * *                 ~
~                              *  * * * * * ****************  ~
~ mliu@cs.ucsb.edu.usa          * * * * * * *                 ~
~                                 * * * * *        ***        ~
~ Serve-volley (is) an art form tragically in the shadow of   ~
~ today's insipid power game.     John Hogan, Columnist       ~ 
~                                 The Weekend Australian      ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Paris Indoor semi match up (Re: Weekend TV Schedule)
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 11:21:40 GMT
Keywords: Paris

In article <1992Nov6.144756.26578@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> I wrote:

>In the US, ESPN will cover the semi and final of the Paris Indoor
>this weekend:
>
>  Saturday: semi final, 4:30pm EST
>  Sunday:   final,      5:00pm EST, both matches tape delayed
>
>Based on the draws posted to this group, after all the upsets earlier,
>the remaining draw is top heavy. We might see a Becker-Edberg or
>Courier-Edberg match in the semi. I assume that ESPN will show only
>one of the two semis; hopefully that is the semi ESPN will show.

Well, Becker beat Courier and Forget beat Edberg. (Edberg was leading
Forget 7-6, 5-1 with two match points but then lost the second set
6-7 and the third set 3-6!) However, the semi final match up is
actually Becker-Ivanisevic and Forget-Halsek. Hopefully, ESPN will
show the "right" semi.
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     HR 1A-304, AT&T Bell Labs, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ, 07748 USA
From: ssubrama@dante.nmsu.edu (SUBRAMANIAM)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Paris QF Update
Date: 7 Nov 92 23:38:55 GMT
Organization: New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM

In article <1992Nov07.023603.18416@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> mliu@garden.csc.calpoly.edu (Mei-Ling L. Liu) writes:
>In article <73920@hydra.gatech.EDU> cs30@prism.gatech.EDU (SMITH,CHRISTOPHER G) writes:
>>
>>Forget(11) d. Edberg(3)    6-7 7-6 6-3
>I am crushed.  I had hoped to see Edberg play on TV this weekend.  I
>just learnt that he actually was up 7-5 and 5-1 before things turned
>around.  Could this be the same guy who won the U.S. Open recently?
>What happened?
>It's just as well, I didn't think he was going to beat Becker and
>especially not Ivanisevic.  Well, may be Goran is going to go up
>higher in the ranking after all.
>However, I think Edberg has passed Sampras as a result of getting
>into the quarterfinal?

What tournament is this?  Please reply by email.  I did not read news for
a few days.
Thanks.
Siva
From: mcguinn@Software.Mitel.COM (Tom McGuinness)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Why would some racquets be more powerful than the other
Date: 7 Nov 92 00:04:22 GMT
Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada.

In article <1992Nov5.192637.18549@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> yu@physun.physics.mcmaster.ca (Fan Yu) writes:
>The properties of a tennis racquet that will affect the speed of the ball
>after impact are most likely its weight distribution and its string tension.
>Therefore the trick behind the widebody design is simply by making the head
>thicker, more weight is concentrated in the head, hence more momentum 
>gathered during the swing and more momentum transferred to the ball upon
>impact. 

>If this is true, why would they call the widebody a 'revolution'?
>Can't they add a few grams to the head of any old racquets instead
>of selling the widebody with twice the price?

>Frank


An article published in the May 2 1992 issue of _New_Scientist_ called
"Anyone for slower tennis" discusses some of the factors involved in 
improving the performance of rackets (more power).

	Flex:	Stiffer frames result in greater ball speeds since flexible
		rackets cannot return to the starting position before the
		ball leaves the strings thus some of the ball's initial
		kinetic energy is lost in unecessarily bending the racket.

	Mass:	Increasing racket head weight by 33% produced only a 5%
		increase in ball speed. 

		An increase of 33% in racket head speed resulted in a 31%
		increase in ball speed.

Its an interesting article and it explores other issues related to the
speed of the current game such as slowing the professional
game down (lighter balls, no 2nd serves, etc). It also describes the 
history of graphite rackets, how balls are tested (a ball dropped from
a height of 254cm should rebound to a height between 135cm and 147cm), and
the manufacturers' interests in the game.


		ToM

______________

Mitel Corporation: Phones that bounce higher than the competition.
From: smuench@i61s4.ira.uka.de (Stefan Muench)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Sport(s) channel tv-commentators
Date: 13 Nov 1992 10:35:31 GMT
Organization: University of Karlsruhe, Institute for Real-time Computer Systems and Robotics (IPR), Germany
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: i61s4.ira.uka.de

Hi,

I've got a question for people in Europe who like to watch tennis on tv.
The Antwerp tournament is only shown on Sport(s) Channel (i.e. Sportkanal
in Germany). I think that Sport(s) Channel is, like Eurosport, transmitted
all over Europe and that there are different commentators commenting in
different languages. In my opinion, the ones that speak german are the
worst ones I've ever heard. One of them is commenting nearly every shot,
it's not necessary to watch anymore. And he always knows what the players
feel and what they think and what they will do next... it's awful.

What I want to know is the following: Am I the only one who don't like
the Sport(s) Channel commentators or are there people that share my
feelings? And what can you tell me about the commentators in other countries?
Where do you watch Sport(s) Channel? Or Eurosport? Are the commentators
better or worse than those of other channels?
-- 


Stefan

PS
I'm not sure whether it's "Sport Channel" or "Sports Channel" (or something
completely different!?), so I wrote "Sport(s) Channel".
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: jwhub@sci.kun.nl (Jan Willem Hubbers)
Subject: Re: Sport(s) channel tv-commentators
Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 14:32:30 GMT

In <1e00djINNppl@iraul1.ira.uka.de> smuench@i61s4.ira.uka.de (Stefan Muench) writes:

>Hi,

>I've got a question for people in Europe who like to watch tennis on tv.
>The Antwerp tournament is only shown on Sport(s) Channel (i.e. Sportkanal
>in Germany). I think that Sport(s) Channel is, like Eurosport, transmitted
>all over Europe and that there are different commentators commenting in
>different languages. In my opinion, the ones that speak german are the
>worst ones I've ever heard. One of them is commenting nearly every shot,
>it's not necessary to watch anymore. And he always knows what the players
>feel and what they think and what they will do next... it's awful.

>Stefan

Well, this is a subject I could talk about for days. I don't know about
the german commentators, but I do know about the dutch. They're awful too.
As for the other networks: Eurosport beats them all. They have somebody
called Herman Kuiphof. He's on top of my list of worst commentators, closely
followed by Ted van der Meer (also Eurosport), Heinze Bakker and Marcella
Mesker (both NOS, dutch national television). Kuiphof manages to call
Edberg Lendl... (3 times within 5 minutes), and can not keep his mouth shut.
Ted van der Meer sounds like he is more interested in basketball or anything
BUT tennis, Heinze Bakker doesn't know the first thing about tennis, but 
thinks he knows everything. Mesker continuously talks about psychology,
and has a very strange perception of tactics (especially for an ex-pro).

I know the BBC has some good commentators, but they don't broadcast tennis
very much.

Jan-Willem
--

  **********************
  * Jan-Willem Hubbers *
  *                    *
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Qualifying for the ATP Fainl (Re: Paris final)
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 16:54:27 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.135717.27351@cc.gatech.edu> csmith@cc.gatech.edu (Christopher Smith) writes:
>
>There are two variables I *think* coming into play here.  1st off, the
>Antwerp tournament for the first time is a sanctioned ATP tournament,
>meaning that those playing have at least a fair chance of gaining computer
>ranking points if their result here is among their 14 best for the year.
>
>Factor number 2 (this one I'm not sure of) is that there may still be a
>53-week discrepancy between tournaments played this year and last, thus
>making it possible that Becker (and others) to lose ranking points.

Neither Chang nor Korda participated in the ATP Final last year,
so they really have no "expiring" points. The situation is complicated
because the difference between Becker (#5) and Lendl (#8) is only
98 points. It depends on how far people advance in Antwerp and
how many bonus points they pick up. Mathematically, perhaps some
of them are still not 100% "safe." This is simply too complicated.
I would just wait a few days to find out who actually qualifies. :-)
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     HR 1A-304, AT&T Bell Labs, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ, 07748 USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: csmith@cc.gatech.edu (Christopher Smith)
Subject: News, Nov 5
Organization: Software Research Center, Georgia Tech
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 23:10:13 GMT


Quick update:

  + Paris (QF matchups)
    -----
    Courier(1) vs. Becker(9)
    Edberg(3) vs. Forget(11)
    Ivanisevic(6) vs. ?      (Wheaton?)
    Leconte vs. Hlasek

    In the battle of the big servers (Ivanisevic vs. Krajicek), Goran
    won out, 6-4 7-6.


  + Oakland (yesterday)
    -------
    K. Maleeva(4) d. Grossman    6-4 4-6 6-3
    Iva Majoli d. McNeil(5)      6-3 0-6 6-2
    Rehe d. G. Fernandez         6-2 1-0 (ret)


..Chris

-- 
--
Christopher Smith                          csmith@cc.gatech.edu
College of Computing (Room 269)                                  
Georgia Tech, Atlanta GA 30332-0280        404/853-0937