HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: smortaz@handel.Eng.Sun.COM (Shahrokh Mortazavi)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Khuzestan, pol dokhtar, etc
Date: 12 Oct 92 21:39:31 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View, CA  USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: handel

In article <1992Oct10.210323.1@skyblu.ccit.arizona.edu> desert@skyblu.ccit.arizona.edu (Desert Man...) writes:

[tear jerking & picturesque recollections about pol-dokhtar deleted]

>> Did it also have any historical significance in ancient Persia?
>
>I'm not sure of its historical significance... But i know there is a story
>behind the location and etc... I just can't remember the story any longer...
>Hope someone else does...

im not sure whether this is the story you were refering to, but 
my dear old father used to tell us this one everytime we passed
by pol-dokhtar.  more interesting than the story was the fact that
my father would forget having told us the story only a week earlier,
on the way over to ahvaaz.  this went on for some 11 years (!) and
each time we'd here a somewhat 'different' version.  

i remember we couldnt wait to get to pol-dokhtar and hear my fathers
enthusiastic words: "kids, have i told you the story behind
pol-dokhtar?".  kids: "noooo! nooo! ". :). 

anyway, i dont recall all the variations, but the basic theme
was this:  there was a young prince who lived on the west bank,
and was in love with a princes from the ghabilee on the east bank.

the two tribes had plenty of differences and were not too happy
with this love affair.  

the prince, in order to visit his beloved, would swim the
cold and thunderous waters each night, exposing himself to 
wraths of the ominous river.

after a few years, the tribe elders decides that this was far
too dangerous for their shaazde to see his (girl) dokhtar, so the
two tribes put their differences aside long enough to build 
'pol-dokhtar' over the river.  

so the young prince started walking across the bridge, instead
of exhausting so much energy fighting the savage river. 

well, after a few years, since the prince wasnt getting much
excersize lazily strolling across the bridge, he started getting
fat and undesireable and the princess started losing interest
in him!

the prince, afraid of losing his sweetheart, arranged for the
bridge to be destroyed, and once again resumed the ritual of
battling the raging waters...  and the princess fell in love
with again, and they lived khappily ever after...

---

well... im not sure if this is what your father used to tell
you, but this is what mine used to tell the restless kids in
the back seat to keep them quiet!

>
>Best wishes...
>
>Ali...
>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: amehdi@src.honeywell.com (Hossien Amehdi)
Subject: Re: purpose of life
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 04:51:24 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.000106.5924@telesoft.com> mnejat@telesoft.com (Mehregan Nejat @lone) writes:
>Is to find out what is purpose of life.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^!
>
>--Mehregan Nejat

I certainly hope not!  This looks like a recursive procedure with no return!

-Hossien
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: seyyed@wuee1.wustl.edu (Seyyed Mahdavian)
Subject: Proof of the general formula for Monty paradox
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis Mo.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 19:19:59 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.162146.28386@wuecl.wustl.edu> seyyed@wuee1.wustl.edu (Seyyed Mahdavian) writes:
 
>Problem #4:
>Monty opens one of the remaining boxes according to a probabilistic
>strategy as follows: He looks at the remaining two boxes. If the prize
>is in one of them, he chooses the empty box with probability q. If both
>are empty, he chooses one of them with probability r. Now he opens the
>box that he has chosen and shows that it is empty (meaning that he is
>lucky, because there is a non-zero probability that he opens the box
>containing the prize). Then he asks whether you want to switch or stay
>with your first choice.
>
>Claim: 
>In this case, if you stay with your first choice, the chance of
>winning is r/(r+q).

Here is how I derived the general formula:

Take five random variables x1, x2, x3, y2, y3. Each of these are either
0 or 1. x1=1 if the prize is in box #1. Same for x2 and x3. Obviously
x1+x2+x3=1. WLOG assume that your first choice is box #1. y2=1 if Monty
chooses box #2 and y3=1 if Monty chooses box #3. Again y2+y3=1.
In terms of equations, these are our hypothesis:

P(x1=1)=P(x2=1)=P(x3=1)=1/3
P(y2=1 | x1=1) = r
P(y2=1 | x2=1) = 1-q
P(y2=1 | x3=1) = q

Assuming that Monty chooses say box #2, the question is:

P(x1=1 | y2=1,x2=0) = ?

P(x1=1 | y2=1,x2=0) = P(x1=1,y2=1,x2=0)/P(y2=1,x2=0)
                    = P(x1=1,y2=1)/P(y2=1,x2=0)
                    = P(y2=1 | x1=1)P(x1=1)/P(y2=1,x2=0)
                    = (r)(1/3)/P(y2=1,x2=0)                      (***)

To compute P(y2=1,x2=0):

P(y2=1)=P(y2=1,x2=0)+P(y2=1,x2=1)
P(y2=1,x2=1)=P(y2=1 | x2=1)P(x2=1)=(1-q)(1/3)
P(y2=1) = P(x1=1)P(y2=1 | x1=1)+P(x2=1)P(y2=1 | x2=1)+P(x3=1)P(y2=1 | x3=1)
        = (1/3)(r) + (1/3)(1-q) + (1/3)(q)
P(y2=1,x2=0) = P(y2=1) - P(y2=1,x2=1)
             = (1/3)(r) + (1/3)(q)                               (###)

Replacing (###) in (***) gives:

P(x1=1 | y2=1,x2=0) = r/(r+q).

                                                    Q.E.D.

Seyyed.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian

In Article 9384 in soc.culture.iranian darice@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Fred Rice) writes:


>>besides the above rationale is that it is a divine ruling, which I cannot
>>argue with.
>
>>If the only explanation is a divine ruling, then don't give us such rationales.
>>And if you do give us such rationales, I would greatly appreciate an answer
>>to my question, thank you.
>
>One can take your argument to any extreme.
>
>There is a possibility that a swarm of bees may sting you, killing
>you, hence, you should always wear bee-protective clothing.

Yes, but in a society with people, murder is much more common than bees
killing you, and far worse a sin than lustfully looking at a woman (even
by Islam's standards.)  So it is not a matter of extreme, but rather of
consistency.  If you take self protection against dangers to a certain limit,
it is assumed that you have along the way covered the more dangerous cases
first, i.e. dangers which threaten more than that of the specified limit.
Murder is more of a threat to people than being lustfully looked at,
yet protection against murder has been neglected here although protection
against being gazed at has not.

>
>Perhaps you prefer to argue in the other direction.... in which case,
>there should be no required safety regulations at work, for you would
>laugh at the possibility that someone could get injured.
>

No I don't, because safety regulations at work are designed to protect
the worker from physical harm without infringing on anybody's well being.
A more accurate analogy for your argument would be if a construction
worker had to wear something cosmetically acceptable, such as a blue shirt,
but was not required to wear a hard hat, thus exposing him/her to severe
injury.This is not a matter of extreme, but one of consistency.  It is
like the government regulating that all cars must have a stereo with 
dolby to minimize displeasure to the listener's ears, but the cars do not 
need seat belts.

>etc.
>
>There are various degrees to which you can take anything.  Islam specifies
>a particular degree.
>

Once again, you have not explained it rationally, but deferred the wisdom in
this ruling to the fact that it is a "divine ruling", and it is specified by
Islam. That is fine, but I am looking for a more rational argument than "you
can take things to any extreme, and Islam specifies so and so extreme." Is
there a rationale behind this extreme?  In Iran, at least, hejab has failed
to prevent all that hejab is meant to prevent.  Prostitution and "corruption"
is worse than ever, and sexual perversion prevails over mutual respect between
the sexes.  I don't know about other countries.  In Iran, it is difficult to
have any kind of relationship as just a friend or even on a professional/
intellectual level with the opposite sex, and I think this is a big loss for
the whole society.  It is nothing less than sexual apartheid.

>Fred Rice
>darice@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au

Agha Javad
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: karim@hp835.mitek.com (Karim Sharif)
Subject: Re: Gif files on PCs
Organization: OpenConnect Systems, Dallas, TX
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 20:53:06 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.162844.22235@src.honeywell.com> amehdi@src.honeywell.com (Hossien Amehdi) writes:
>
>Anyone knows what type of software is needed to view gif files on PCs? 
>

  There are many shareware programs that allow you to view gifs and bmp
  files.  The one that I use and like are vpic.exe for DOS and
  wingif for Windows.

  You should be able to use a DOS ftp site (i do not know of one) to get
  them.

>Thanks
>-Hossien
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Konar, Khuzistan and a quiz
From: desert@skyblu.ccit.arizona.edu (Desert Man...)
Date: 9 Oct 92 13:03:42 MST
 <1992Oct8.025556.1@skyblu.ccit.arizona.edu> <1992Oct9.000533.12883@netcom.com>
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Univ. of Arizona...,TSN, AZ...
Nntp-Posting-User: desert

In article <1992Oct9.000533.12883@netcom.com>, bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi) writes:
> In article <1992Oct8.025556.1@skyblu.ccit.arizona.edu> desert@skyblu.ccit.arizona.edu (Desert Man...) writes:
> 
>>home bleeding badly and my momAn smacked me semi-hardly in the back of the
>>head
> 
> Ali jAn, at this forum reference to this act has been reported to be called
> 'pas gardani.'  
> 
> Sorry, just couldn't resist.
> 

Heheheh... I *know* you couldn't *resist* that... You and Mack always crack me
up with your wise-cracks... :)    Too bad you are not here to be treated for
a chelokababe Hosseini (thats the kind made by using the ``gaz choobb'' instead
of the metal ``seekhs''... This kind of kabab is a common treat made by the 
Esfahanies... :)

> Now, did your house have an airport in its backyard?  :-)

In fact, We do!!!   Our house was and still is, right behind the ``Vahdati
Air Force Base'' (Known to be the most sophesticated in the region)... In
the back of inside the house, my brothers have created a war! museum of Iraqi
planes, missile, etc. pieces that were shut down or fell close to the base...

Best wishes...

Ali...
-- 
Desert@ccit.arizona.edu
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| ``It is hard to make friends with Reality,                              |
|	       because Reality doesn't care whether you like it or not.'' |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Organization: The American University - University Computing Center
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 18:53:17 EDT
From: Reza Modarres <RMODARR@auvm.american.edu>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Monty Hall Paradox (was Re: Physics-1A Question)
 <1992Oct8.143504.2614@wuecl.wustl.edu> <92282.115715RMODARR@auvm.american.edu>
 <1992Oct9.160155.24427@wuecl.wustl.edu>

In article <1992Oct9.160155.24427@wuecl.wustl.edu>, seyyed@wuee1.wustl.edu
(Seyyed Mahdavian) says:
>
>In article <92282.115715RMODARR@auvm.american.edu> Reza Modarres
><RMODARR@auvm.american.edu> writes:
>
>>     I wouldn't worry about it. This problem has a long history and has      d
>stumpe
>>     the best probabilist/statisticians. It also appeared in Prade Magazin in
>>     a column by Marilyn von Savant who reportedly holds the world's highest
>>     IQ. She also analyzed the problem in the same manner that you did.
>>     It's trivial to see that the problem is dependent on the hosts strategy,
>>     however. A simple simulation based on the equiprobable assumption shows
>               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>     that the odds are 1/3 to 2/3. Here we go again with assumptions.:-)
>      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>RezA
>
>It depends on how you run the simulation. By "equiprobable assumption" you
>probably mean that the first choice is done with equal probability. We have
>no problem here. The trick of the problem is somewhere else. The question
>is: AFTER the first choice, how do you pick from the other remaining two?
>Do you do a WISE choice, i.e. you know which box is empty and deliberately
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>choose it, or do you just pick one of them and it happens that it is empty.
>Now if you want, I can tell you how to run a simulation based on the second
>strategy to obtain 1/2 to 1/2 odds.
>
>Seyyed.


   Mr. Seyyed,

     The answer came to me in my sleep last night. I think "you are right"
     is the correct answer to this problem.  Try it! Everyone will agree
     with you.

     Anyways, as far as "a WISE strategy" is concerned I would try to
     bribe Monthy!


RezA
From: seyyed@wuee1.wustl.edu (Seyyed Mahdavian)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Mahin khAnoum roush nemisheh!
Date: 7 Oct 92 13:02:40 GMT
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis Mo.

In article <6OCT199222064473@reg.triumf.ca> mahin@reg.triumf.ca  writes:

>My favourite mosalmoon writes:
    ^^^^^^^^^
ey bAbA, ajab ghalati kardam hA! hAlA bikhe rishe khodam gir kard!

>And as for you Seyyed joon, well, these conventional methods don't work on
>me dear.  

Look Miss Mahin, I am not your "joon" or "dear" OK? Now don't worry, I am
going to find you a husband. Believe me these methods work. It's a public
forum and lots of people read this newsgroup. There might be a chance that
at least one of them hit his head to a wall or something and come forward
to khAstegAri you. Shahrokh fears that you might not like his zaboune
alkan, but don't worry inghadr zaboun berizam tA yA shahrokh yA yek ... dige
peydA beshe dast bAlA begire. 
AhAy ayyoha nAs, yek nafar mahze rezAye khodA biyAd in torshi bAdemjoun ro
az sare mA vAz koneh. bekhodA shohar delesh mikhAd, faghat roush nemisheh!

Seyyed.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian,soc.culture.turkish
From: samiri@encore.com (Soheila Amiri)
Subject: Konar, Khuzistan and a quiz
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 18:24:27 GMT
Keywords: more on native Khuzistan trees

suzi@pyrps5.eng.pyramid.com (Suzan Ehdaie) writes:

>Konar is not zAl-zAlak.  They are different fruits.  Infact, I remember that 
>Tehranis didn't know what Konar is and once I give some konar to my friends 
>in Tehran and they didn't like the taste.  Perhaps, they weren't used to such
>taste.  The konar subject reminds me of my childhood where we always became 
>excited seeing a konar tree and then collecting a handfull of konars with 
>our shirts!!!!  And eating them with pleasure :-)

You are right.  Konar is the fruit of the tree whose leaves are turned
into powder (called sedr) and used for washing hair by natives of
KhuzestAn among other areas.  It is a tree native to KhusiztAn.  It is
interesting that I have found two varieties of the same fruit here in the
US.  One comes from a very rare tree they call "The Indian Jou Jou Tree".
The tree itself resembles the "Sedr" tree but has larger leaves.  The fruit
is round and is the size of cherry tomatos.  The other kind comes from
South America and is called "la seerouella (sp?)".  This one is oval shaped
and is the size of large olives.  They both are quite tasty when they turn
yellow, orange and eventually red as they ripen.

Now for the avid konAr lovers, there is a variety of konar which grows
wild in the BakhtiAree mountains.  It is called "ree-me-leek" in BakhtiAri
dialect and is a short, thorny shrub with a lot of small blue-berry like
red fruits.  If you haven't tasted that fruit, you don't know what
you're missing.  They bear fruit in spring, around new year just like
the konar trees.  Next time you are driving from AhwAz say to Masjed-
SoleymAn or Shushtar, stop by along side the road.  There are a zillion
of the shrubs all over the place.  But I'd have to agree with our Dezfully
friends.  Shushtar and Dezfull are the Konar capitals of the wrold...
Can't beat that!!

I've got a quiz question for you fellow KhuzistAnies.  Do any of you
know/remember what "sepessoon" and "lagajee" fruits are and did you
ever taste them?

Soheila (missing getting hit in the head by the stones thrown to the konar
	 tree..) Sigh.... Sigh....
Xref: sparky soc.culture.iranian:8761 soc.culture.pakistan:15557 soc.culture.arabic:4184
From: abbasa@ul.ie
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian,soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.arabic
Subject: Re: Israel and Khomeini regimes (was Re: Hekmatyar....)
Date: 9 Oct 92 03:10:12 GMT
Organization: University of Limerick, Ireland

In article <saied.718397804@cwis>, saied@cwis.unomaha.edu (Saied*) writes:
> abbasa@ul.ie writes:
>>In a her bid to cover up her realtions with Israel and her maters, MKO(
>>an anti-Iran organisation mostly comprised of non-moslems factions, like 
>>Bahais, and financed by Saddam, CIA, and Musad) is desperately trying to 
>>fabricate some sort of link between Islamic Iran and Israel. But I doubt
>>that these kind of tricks will help her a lot. 
> 
> It is not "her" bit to cover up "her" relations with Israel, but
> its an overwhelming number of existing documents that are proofs
> of the Khomeini regime's deals with the Israel. How long you fools
> want to keep your head under snow?

Just give us one document from NEUTRAL source.


> 
> (A couple of weeks ago, the ABC's Nightline even played parts of
> a conversation between an Israeli agent and a representative of
> the Khomeini regime during arm deals in Tehran.)

So, American nightline is very very "authentic" and  "unbiased" source
from your point of view? Do you that propagada is most lethal weapon?
 
> Also, since you seem to know of "her" relations with Israel and
> financial support for "her" from Saddam, CIA, and Musad, why do
> not you present one (i.e., "vahed" since you know Arabic better)
> authentic document to support your claim. Note that I am not
> asking for proof of "her" being mostly non-Muslims and Baha'i.
> 
> [rest of garbage deleted]

Your organisation is based in IRAQ, they fought on the side of SADDAM.
They hepled Saddam to rain Iranian cities with missiles.  You people are
siding a dictator who is the worst in the humane history, is not he? 
You people are criminal of killing in hundreds of thousands the very people 
you claim to advocate for. Your hands are cloured with the blood of innocent
women, children and men.  Is that not a sufficient proof? Can you deny 
it? 

You know, the punishment of mudering one believer is hanging to death in this 
world and eternal hell in the next world. You have killed thousands of 
innocent muslims, you are working for the interests of non muslims, and 
you have revolted against an islamic government, which truely represent 
not only the iranian people but the whole muslim ummah. Just tell us 
honestly what punishment you people deserve from islamic  point of view 
if you believe in islam?


Asad.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: amoojoon@ghahveh.khooneh.mash.yadollAh (Bacheh Morshed)
Subject: Re: Hazrateh Zainab as an experimental feezeezeest
Summary: bA hameh shookhi, bA amoo ham shooki? 
Keywords: adab az ke Amookhti?
Organization: naghAl khooneh
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 20:28:42 GMT


NOTE: my apologies to our ahAli for reinserting ali bAbA's not-so-polite
      posting, but it seemed inevitable.

In article <1992Oct7.152535.5038@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com> 
ali@utrcv1 (ALI BABA) writes:


>Dear Mahin;
>Baba dast khosh
>If the shah was still in power and Shahreh know was still open in Iran, 
>you had All the knowledge and qualification for becoming khonoomeh 
>bozorgeh. Well don't get disappointed, as a good old Iranian expression 
>says "khoda kaz zeh hekmat bebandat dari ze rahmat goshayed dareh digari", 
>try Turky or Amoo's Ghahvah Khoneh.
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Btw, If you decide to try Turky you definitely need first aid kit for the
>first year, but it's not recommended for Amoo's Ghahvah khoneh since the
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>people are much friendlier and usualy supply their own first aid kit which
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>consist of (aaftabeh, baadkoneke, pashah koshe and roghaneh kharcheck)



Ali joon,

This is *the first* and *the last* response that you'll ever get from Amoo 
on the above subject; You're more than welcome(but not encouraged) to get on 
my case although I've been "na sareh peeyAz, na taheh peeyAz" in this whole 
deal.

After reading your prescription for Mahin we had a chat at our ghahveh 
khooneh about it, and since our reputation was on the line, mash YadollAh 
insisted that I clarify this for our ahAli's sake.

You see what you received at our ghahveh khooneh was a one-time-deal and 
will not happen again. The guys whom you dealt with and found "friendly" 
were temporary staff hired for the time when we were on vacation. We are 
guilty of not checking their "salAhiyateh akhlAghi" thoroughly enough but 
that's our only fault. As a result you stopped by and you know the rest. 
The reason I think your prescription wouldn't work for any female is simple; 
those guys have a different sexual orientation. 
We've never been, aren't, and won't be in that kind of business so regardless
of how much you enjoyed the treatment you don't need to recommend it to 
others. Please keep your own "hormat" by not dragging this too far.


bA adab bAsheed,


amoo(on behalf of Mash YadollAh@ghahveh.khooneh.mash.YadollAh) 

Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
From: amehdi@src.honeywell.com (Hossien Amehdi)
Subject: BRAINWASH
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 20:36:35 GMT

Hi Everyone:

  Anyone out there with medical expertise (i.e. Psychiatrist, Psychologist,
  etc.) who could give a technical definition for the term "brainwash". 
  I looked up my dictionary and didn't think the definition given there was
  adequate.  An answer with an example (i.e. someone on this net whom you 
  believe is brainwashed based on his/her articles) would be very  much 
  appreciated.


*****************************************
* Hossien Amehdi                        *  
* Senior Research Scientist             *            
* Honeywell Systems and Research Center *            
* MN65-2500                             *          
* 3660 Technology Dr.                   *
* Minneapolis, MN 55418                 *
*                                       *
* email: amehdi@src.honeywell.com       *
*****************************************
From: abbasa@ul.ie
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: Truth and MKO
Date: 9 Oct 92 01:10:29 GMT
Organization: University of Limerick, Ireland

> In article <saied.718394276@cwis>, saied@cwis.unomaha.edu (Saied*) writes:
> |> hossein@nu.Berkeley.EDU (Karbalie Hossein) writes:
> |> >Doostane Aziz,
> |> >	I would like to know how many of the MKO's supporters 
> |> >feel that they are Muslims first and Iranian's second.
> |> 
> |> You are mixing nationality with ideaology. Although there are
> |> an exteremly small number of non-iranians in (or affiliated)
> |> with the Mojahedin, the rest are Iranians. That is also true
> |> for the their supporters.
> |> 
> |> Now the idealogy. The Mojahedin believe firmly in Islam.

If you people believe in islam, then tell us from Koran and sunnah,

1: Which constituents of present constitution of IRAN are against Islam??

Please be specific and present verses of the holy Koran and authentic
Hadiths.  

 


> |> However, they do not impose their ideaology on others. They
> |> also cooperate closely with groups or personalities who are
> |> non-Muslims (and who are in fact non-believers). The majority
> |> of the Mojahedin supporters are Muslims (or at least believe
> |> in the legitimacy of Islam.) I am one of them. But believing
> |> in Islam is not a prerequisite. There are MANY Mojahedin
> |> supporters who do not believe in Islam.

What "islamic cause" have united "MUSLIMS" with non-muslims in MKO?????.

I'd like to see references from KORAN and Hadiths.


ASAD.






Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian