HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: wonge@fraser.sfu.ca (Edmund Wong)
Subject: bbs for Linux
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 10:29:43 GMT


    Hi, I was wondering if there exists a BBS for Linux that I can use,
which has the following two basic features:-

  1) It can handle fidonet-type messages, and Internet-news type messages.
  2) There is a capability for it to be used with a Mailer(front end).

   The situation is this.  I am currently running a Remote Access BBS system,
and FrontDoor 2.02nc as a Front End mailer.  

   I have recently installed Linux to my 486/33 8mb ram and have somewhat
fell in love with it, so to speak.  I installed Linux on a 51 meg partition
with no swap parititions or anything, as I still am having problems with
Linux, even though small ones.  My other partition is a Dos partition with
65 megs or so, and I feel it quite a nuissance to even bother having two
different OS on the same system.  One thing, booting is a pain in the neck,
(haven't installed LiLo yet, but will) and secondly, I'd rather commit
most of the HD to Linux; but my soon-to-be-restored-bbs would be in my
Dos partition.  So I figured, won't it be awesome if I can have a BBS that
can read fidonet-type messages, or at least have a message tosser for
fidonet-type messages, as well as the same echoproccessor having Internet
mail capabilities? (damn..my terminals a bit screwed up, but I should
have meant 'echoproccessor' instead of 'message tosser'.

  So in conclusion, I was wondering if anyone has any ideas.  I actually
checked out sunsite.unc.edu and found a directory /pub/packages/bbs or
something like that, and it had some BBS source code, but I am not sure
if they worked or at least, I'm not even sure if that's the actual bbs
package I'm looking for.  In any event, I downloaded the whole stuff,
only to realize that 'bbselm.tar'(renamed) and 'bbsuemacs.tar' and
some other stuff were > 1.44 MB, and thusly, I couldn't rawrite them
to 3 1/2" floppies, like I did with most of the other software packages
I got.   

   Can someone please help me with this minor/major dilemma?  

   any help appreciated.

PS: I DID write a similar plea in alt.bbs, but someone suggested I write
   it here...

   Thanks..
   
-- 
InterNet: wonge@fraser.sfu.ca  |  "Fail not; Learn Not.
                               |  It is with failing, that one learns,
                               |  So by Learning, one must fail." - Edmund Wong
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: ashtray@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (John Newnham)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Modem control (was Re: uucico not hanging up the telephone line)
Date: 22 Dec 92 23:05:40 GMT
Organization: you have got to be kidding!

In article <BzJnu7.7sC@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Jeff-Randall@uiuc.edu (Jeff Randall) writes:
>(this is the standard
>assumption for all UN*X systems, if the first car is capital, all capitals
>are printed and the capitals input are mapped to lowercase)

I think this is just a little bit wrong:  Most unices I have seen only assume
you don't have lowercase if the _entire_ login name is in caps.  This is
certainly the case on Linux using getty_ps, as Issaqua@cinders could
tell you.  The fix sounds ok, though.

ashtray
-- 
Vogt's commentary on the theory of Morphic Resonance:
  There is no god!  The universe just got into bad habits. (Marcus Voght)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds)
Subject: Re: What logs off?
Organization: University of Helsinki
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 11:38:31 GMT

In article <BzvxEC.7sz@citrus.SAC.CA.US> qumqats@citrus.SAC.CA.US ( Joel M. Baldwin ) writes:
>
>I have to echo this question.  I'm running SLS 0.98pl1 with the
>0.98.pl4 kernel and I've noticed that if someone just hangs up
>without logoff then they're >NOT< logged off.  It looks like the
>controling process is terminated, but if they're in a child process
>then the parent is just left hanging.
>
>Is this a bug in the kernel or in init or what?
>
>I consider it a pretty serious problem for a public access system to not
>have a user logged off when they hang up the phone for whatever reason!

It's a bug in the kernel.  In pre-0.99 kernels, a serial hangup resulted
in SIGHUP being sent to the foreground processes, which is not correct:
in 0.99 it's sent to the controlling process, which should help
somewhat.  In 0.99.1 the full POSIX requirements should be met, and the
problem should be totally gone.  Try upgrading - if you still have
problems with 0.99.1 please contact me. 

With 0.99.1, the following is done when a hangup occurs:

 (a) send a SIGHUP to the controlling process of the tty (this is
     normally the first-level shell)

 (b) all subsequent read()'s on all files open to that tty will return
     EOF (0), and all subsequent write()'s will return -1 with errno
     being set to EIO. 

Additionally, when the controlling process dies, all the foreground
processes will be sent a SIGHUP (this is not directly connected with the
tty drivers, but it usually accompanies the tty hangup). 

You should also make sure that
 - the tty should have the CLOCAL flag cleared (CLOCAL is used to
   indicate that you are running a local serial line without hangup
   detection). 
 - your modem is set up correctly to drop DCD when carrier is lost. 

Additionally, for extra safety you can use a 'login' binary that does a
vhangup() when a new person logs in: that will kill any pending
processes on that tty. 

		Linus
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: dld54032@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Dave Dribin)
Subject: "the `gets' function is unreliable and should not be used"??!!!
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 21:53:06 GMT

I was trying to compile some programs that I had written for class on
a Sun Sparc and compile using gcc, and I kept getting this error that
the `gets' function is unreliable.  How can it be unreliable!  It won't
even work with this simple program:
#include <stdio.h>

main() {
	char str[256];

	gets(str);
	puts(str);

	return(0);
}

I am using SLS Linux v99.0.  Did I install anything wrong, or is the function
really unreliable.  I would think that all the standard ASNI functions would
be reliable!  Thanx in andvance, and happy new year...

Dave

-- 
Dave "Dribs" Dribin         |"No you don't!  You can't take it from me now!
dribs@uiuc.edu              | I've had this ice cream bar since I was a
"Happy, Happy!! Joy, Joy!!" | child... People... Always trying to take it
                            | from me... Why don't they leave me ALONE?!!!"
From: richb@jti.com (Richard Braun)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: uucico not hanging up the telephone line
Date: 28 Dec 92 15:44:30 GMT
Organization: Jupiter Technology Inc. / Waltham, MA

gstrauss@yikes.uucp (Gary C. Strauss) writes:
>Hi,  I am just getting news running on my system SLS version 0.98pl1 and I 
>have encountered a small problem.  If for some reason uucico is unable to
>connect properly with the system it is contacting, say it fails in the logon
>script, it terminates okay but fails to hang up the modem.  This can be
>an expensive error.  Does anyone have any idea why this is happening?

Did an answer to this earlier article get posted?  I could also use
similar information.  My uucico and getty sessions aren't hung up properly;
I notice this because I have a similarly-misconfigured modem on the other
side (a 3.2 UNIX whose serial cable I still need to tinker with).

If I run 'kermit' on the Linux system, I note that DTR is dropped for about
500ms if I type the hangup command to it.  But if I remote login to the
modem, DTR remains high when I log out.  I'm running with the H.Lu release
0.98pl5 dating back a few weeks.

In answer to Gary's question above, a lot of modems come factory-
configured to ignore the state of DTR.  Look for the "&D" setting in
your modem; mine was indeed &D0 before I changed it.  Some modems show
the state of DTR in a front-panel LED; try running the same test I did
with Kermit to see if the signal is dropped.  (I won't buy internal
modems 'cause it's hard to diagnose problems and 'cause you can't reset
them without rebooting the computer.  With a little shopping, I found
an external 14.4K modem for less than most internals.)  For about US$10
you can get an RS-232 signal indicator from places like Radio Shack; it's
an invaluable tool.

I also note that the standard getty configuration seems not to work with
a hardwired local terminal because getty changes the clocal stty setting.
When I get some time I'll download the source to getty and alter this
logic.

-rich
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: amir@avalon.physik.unizh.ch (Guindehi Amir)
Subject: IBM Proprinter & Linux .98p5
Organization: University of Zurich, Department of Computer Science
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 03:23:26 GMT

Hi Folks !
I have an old IBM Proprinter connected to lpt1 (/dev/lp1). But when ever I
print a Linux textfile with cat file > /dev/lp1 the output does'nt have
LF's and looks like :

Line 1
      Line 2
            Line 3
                  etc.

An msdos file copied to the linux-fs with mcopy comes out correctly, but in
emacs each line has a ^M at the end.

My /etc/pritcap is very primitive, because I don't have any man's :
#lp|panasonic:lp=/dev/lp1:sd=/usr/spool/lp/panasonic:lf=/usr/bin/mail:mc#1:\
#             ft=$$c$$p$$r$$f:hl#2:fl#3:ht=$$c$$n$$r$$t:sh:
# 19/12/92 Amir
lp|proprinter:lp=/dev/lp1:sd=/usr/spool/lp/proprinter:lf=/usr/adm/lpd-errs:mc#1:

Any help out there linux gurus ?

Thx in advance, and sorry if it is a FAQ. But I haven't found any

- Amir Guindehi

Email : amir@avalon.physik.unizh.ch
	aguindeh@iiic.ethz.ch
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: tom@druid.bo.open.de (Thomas Weiss)
Subject: XFree86 problems with ATI Vantage
Keywords: ATI
Organization: News at druid
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 20:00:32 GMT



I currently try to get XFree86 (color server) working with
my ATI Graphics Vantage / EIZO 8060S.

The server does not support the 8514 mode but has an ATI Wonder driver,
which I want to use, but I dont know the clock settings from the
videocard.

If someone uses the same configuration (same ATI), or has any clue
to solve my problems please e-mail me !


Thanks in advance, Thomas
From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Screwy characters after accidentally typing a binary?
Date: 23 Dec 1992 01:24:04 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

agc@weasel.demon.co.uk (Alan Charlton) writes:

>In article <1h31dtINN1gu@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> sdh@po.CWRU.Edu (Scott D. Heavner) writes:
>> 
>> 	Every once in a while, I try to type a binary file
>> and my charcters all get shifted to graphics.  Upper case
>> is OK, and if I logout and login with ALL CAPS, it will
>> run and I can read everything again (without lower case,
>> of course).  Is there any way to fix this?  It only happens on
>> one VC, the rest are fine.
>> 
>> 	I have had this problem with other unix systems
>> and never learned how to fix it.
>> 
>> 				Scott Heavner
>> -- 
>> HELP! I'm being held prisoner in a .sig file factory.
>> 

>Yep, BTDT.  I don't know either, but I'd love to know the answer....

>Alan.
>-- 

This is a script I keep in /usr/bin called fix:

#!/bin/sh
echo ^O^[[r
clear

replace the ^O and ^[ with control-O and escape accordingly.

James
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: Alex Kambis <kambis@asdsun.larc.nasa.gov>
Subject: SLS 0.99
Reply-To: kambis@asdsun.larc.nasa.gov
Organization: The Internet
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:05:07 GMT

hello, all.
	I can't find SLS .99 at sunsite /pub/Linux/SLS or at tsx-11 ~/SLS.
The version levels at both places say .98pl5.  Is this really .99?
I already have .98.5 up 'n' running. Do I really want to mess with .99 ?
(It seems to be having the usual probs)?

Thanks in advance,
	Alex.
kambis@asdsun.larc.nasa.gov
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: A8721GAJ@vm.univie.ac.at (Osiander MEIXNER)
Subject: ne2000 packetdriver ?
Organization: University of Vienna
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:29:55 GMT

LINUX is GREAT|| But without an Internet-connection it is useless to me.
May I tell Santa Claus a wish ? I need a ne2000 driver - very urgently.
Ok you might say: Put a wd8xxxx inside your PC - but it's the University's PC|
Thanks a lot to the person(s) who may do the programming - I am a biologist and
do not have the knowledge.
-Osiander Meixner    a8721gaj@awiuni11.edvz.univie.ac.at
                     a8721gaj@AWIUNI11.BITNET
From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Short filenames under Linux
Date: 25 Dec 1992 11:16:32 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu
Keywords: The number fourteen

mph@plasma.apana.org.au (Martin Peter Howell) writes:

>cdillon@muse.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Craig Dillon) writes:

>>Now, I know that there is one standard form of Un*x that has 14 character
>>filenames - but lets face it - who uses it and is happy? So I know I can't
>>complain - I'm not. Linux (apart from the filename length) is great, but I
>>do have the following questions:

>>(2)	Does anyone know how to get around the problem? I looked into the
>>	kernel source, but not being knowledgeable on these things, I can't
>>	be sure that it would be an easy change or not. I presume not,
>>	otherwise other people would have done it already. Any clues?

>Has anyone tried recompiling the minix fs with, say, 40 character filenames,
>is this just a matter of changing a #define?  Since I am about to install
>a new linux system on my second machine and dont care about the backward 
>compatibility, I would love to do this and still maintain the performance
>benefits of the minix fs over the extfs.

>-Martin.
>mph@plasma.apana.org.au

The problem with doing this, is that no binaries that access the files will
work anymore. Stuff like ls, bash, make.... will all be broken. You would
need to make a new fs, and then recompile all those binaries to use it before
actually making a fs on something.

James
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds)
Subject: Re: .99.1
Organization: University of Helsinki
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 10:27:04 GMT

In article <78738@hydra.gatech.EDU> ccasted@prism.gatech.EDU (Edward Deering Boykin) writes:
>What exatly does the Linux .99 patch 1 fix from .99? Is this just
>the two line patch Linus posted a little bit after he released .99?
>Is it what is now at Sunsite's SLS distribution?

No, 0.99 patchlevel 1 is not just the two-line fixes to 0.99 - the
context diffs are 45kB compressed, and contain various minor fixes.  The
biggest are probably still the tcp/ip fixes (these are Ross' 5 tcp-ip
patches, with some additional patches by me), but there are minor
modifications in various places (minix-fs, /proc filesystem, scsi tapes,
configuration etc).  If you don't use tcp/ip, you'll probably not notice
too much of a difference, but I'd still like people to upgrade just so
that I know it doesn't break in some silly way. 

		Linus

PS.  0.99.1 can mess up your keyboard leds at bootup: the simple fix
should be to add a 'set_leds()' call at the end of kbd_init().  But
it's not exactly a major problem even so, and probably doesn't even
happen on most setups..
From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Need Help! Missing <linux/file.h> header files for GCC 2.2.2d
Date: 2 Jan 1993 07:22:43 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu
Keywords: more questions about gcc

b645zav@utarlg.uta.edu (Christopher Morris) writes:

>Hi *,

>I need help from GCC experts!  I've installed Linux 0.98p5 and GCC
>2.2.2d.  There seems to be a problem with some missing header files.
>In files such as errno.h, signal.h, termios.h, etc; each contain
>references to header files of the same name located in the subdirectory 
>linux.  (ie.  errno.h contains the reference #include <linux/errno.h>)
>This subdirectory does exist, but it contains only one file, const.h.

>I've looked at the FAQ(s), and one of them made a reference to
>info file gcc2 and a FAQ located in /usr/install.  Neither of these
>files exists either.

>Is there something I'm missing here?  Any help would be greatly
>appreciated!  (I can't compile anything due to these missing files!)

>BTW, I installed from the SLS distribution found on wuarchive.wustl.edu.

>Thanks,

If this isn't in the FAQ, it needs to go in immediatly.

You have to download the kernel source for whatever version of the kernel
you are booting from and install it. Most people put it in /usr/src/linux.

Then do the next 2 commands as root:

ln -s -f /usr/src/linux/include/asm /usr/include/asm
ln -s -f /usr/src/linux/include/linux /usr/include/linux

This will link in the kernel include files so you can compile things correctly.

James
From: iarit@slate.mines.colorado.edu (ARIT ISMAIL)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: UUCP strange problem..
Date: 28 Dec 92 02:11:25 GMT
Organization: Colorado School of Mines

I go it.
thanks
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: vince@halcyon.com (Vince Skahan)
Subject: Re: A discipline for packages
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 21:13:13 GMT

marcf@nexus.yorku.ca (Marc G Fournier) writes:

>nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson) writes:

>>What I would rather see is a subdirectory per package.  For example,
>>/package/sendmail (and the corresponding subdirectories lib, src, cf,
>>man.1, man.5, man.8, bin, etc).

that's how I have things set up for news/mail on the sites I run at work
and it's WONDERFUL.  If you want to nuke a package, you delete the tree.
Nice and simple.

(I add /usr/local/bin and /usr/man/* links so people can find things.
That makes it a little cluttered, but it's simple to look at /usr/local/bin
and figure out what came with that package).

>	Geez...that would make one messy file system...everything
>symlinked to everything else.

no it wouldn't.

>	Most Unix Operating Systems I've used have both an install
>and an uninstall command that does the same as rm -r would do
>to a /package/name directory

no they don't.  The only one I've ever found is Ultrix...and that one
gets wierd if you have to 'hack' an install due to the inadequacies
of their installation software.


>	I don't see a benefit to this at all.  On top of the inefficiency
>of it all...you would be wasting a hell of a lot of i-nodes doing this
>as well (among probably a hundred other things)

so what...hardware is cheap.

when o/s people start realizing that and taking advantage of things to
reorganize the setups to reduce the REAL pain in system administration
(ie...care and feeding of the mess you have once it's installed), it'll
be a big gain.


-- 
   ------------------- Vince Skahan ------ vince@halcyon.com ----------------
    ... to list Waffle files available from the mail server at halcyon.com,
            send mail to 'fileserv@halcyon.com' with the text 'index' ...
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: satishc@microsoft.com (Satish Chittamuru)
Subject: Re: Question about ISA/IDE disk throughput (pc newbie)
Date: 23 Dec 92 22:23:02 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation
Distribution: comp
Keywords: speed bus IDE EISA ISA SCSI VESA

In article <1992Dec21.220009.12403@utagraph.uta.edu> turbo@cse.uta.edu (Chris Turbeville) writes:
 > In article <MUTS.92Dec21193512@PMCS.estec.esa.nl> muts@estec.esa.nl (Peter Mutsaers) writes:
 > >Sorry if you see this message twice. I posted before but the article
 > >didn't seem to show up.
 > I didn't see it twice.
 > >
 > >In a magazine I read for a couple of 386sx PC's that disk access (IDE)
 > >is only at 200 kbyte/s. This seems terribly slow to me, especially
 > >for an OS like unix. Is this really true? Do 486dx's have much better
 > >IO speeds? How can UNIX live with such a low bandwidth. Are local
 > >busses much faster (how much)?
 >
 > 200kB/s sounds about right for IDE (save the newer caching controllers)
 > and it is terribly slow.  486dx's make no improvement on disk transfer
 > speed.  It is your 16bit 8Mhz ISA bus which is limiting it.  I don't
 > think full blown vmunix would live well in such an environment.  Local

Umm...Sorry to burst your bubble, but... I have a ISA bus 486/33 with
a generic (read $20) IDE & I/O board controlling a Seagate ST3283A. I
have achieved peak transfer rates of 1250KB/sec. The iozone benchmark
under linux (with a Minix partition) consistently does 550KB/sec writes
and about 640KB/sec reads. Ofcourse, I run my I/O bus at 11MHz instead
of the standard 8MHz but 200KB/sec is too low. A caching controller
with lots of memory will probably do much better, but you are better
off buying more main memory with a vanilla IDE controller than a
caching controller.

 > Thanks
 > -Chris


-- 
Satish K. Chittamuru				satishc@microsoft.com
=====
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein, either stated or implied, are
solely my own and do not reflect Microsoft's views in any manner.
From: rob@phavl.UUCP (Robert Ransbottom)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Fujistu
Date: 22 Dec 92 14:54:35 GMT
Organization: erehton

In article <20DEC199205281017@cnsvax> tannerrj@cnsvax (ROOT OF INSIGHT-- A 486 RUNNING LINUX V0.99) writes:
>I am looking for the stats (heads, sectors and cylinders) for
>the Fujistu SCSI drive model number m2624F-512. Thanks

Try 
  496 cyl 
  64  hd 
  32  sec

this worked for me.  The ISC 386/ix 2.0.2 (sVr3.2) install program 
grabs these params. (How'd it do that?)

-- 
rob   Robert Ransbottom
"It is extremely important to maintain correct attributions." -- anonymous
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: splee@alchemy.tn.cornell.edu (Seng-Poh Lee)
Subject: Remote telnets echo ^M instead of accepting line input.
Organization: Alchemy International
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 13:42:18 GMT

I'm telneting into my Linux box (SLS .99PL1) from a Sun and when I enter
the user name and hit enter, it echos ^M instead of accepting the line. 
If I then hit ^J, it accepts the input, and then every thing is ok, ie
<enter> accepts the line at the shell level.  The same thing happens
with ftp logins, and even shell script inputs.  Everything works ok when
I telnet into the box from itself. 

Any ideas? Sorry if it is a FAQ.

Thanks.

--
Seng-Poh Lee    <splee@alchemy.tn.cornell.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.announce!
From: schounj@edmund.cs.andrews.edu (Jeff Schoun)
Subject: Drivers for TSENG ET400 and Viewsonic 5e needed!
Organization: Andrews University
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 21:06:30 GMT

I am needing the driver file (Xconfig) for the Tseng ET4000 GA200 local
bus board with the Viewsonic 5e moniter. Can anyone help? I tryed one
from FTP and aftyer 5 hours of work only get an blur on the screen, must
be wrong settings, can anyone hlep help? I need the whole Xconfig I
think. Thanks!

Jeff

schounj@edmund.cs.andrews.edu

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: amartell@nyx.cs.du.edu (Alex Martelli)
Subject: Re: Question and Observations
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 23:53:29 GMT

whit@Tymnet.COM (Kendall Whitlatch) writes:
	...
>I just wanted to extend to Peter my thanks for compiling the SLS package.

Seconded.  Came up like a snap... and if there's a few glitches to fix
(/dev/null 644...:-), it's still MUCH less time than collecting,
configuring and compiling a thousand idiosyncratic packages!

>flaw in the package is found.  I think he needs a little applause for
>even attempting the task in the first place.

Hear hear!

Alex
--
Alex Martelli - preferred email alex@am.sublink.org
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: tree@midget.towson.edu (Denise Tree)
Subject: New rzsz 9202
Reply-To: tree@midget.towson.edu (Denise Tree)
Organization: The Internet
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 04:18:38 GMT

I just patched rzsz9202 with the linux diffs for download status. But
even though I have RZSZLINE exported fro .bash_profile I cannot get it
to recive a download.... I also tried $ rz </dev/ttys0> /devttys0 from
xc prompt. I _know_ this is a dumb question!

Denise
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux