HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Niners/Bills (gag)
Date: 15 Sep 92 00:21:16 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <192vgbINNaqn@agate.berkeley.edu> felix@ocf.berkeley.edu (Felix Ling) writes:

>>In article <d9xndga.mzimmers@netcom.com>, mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:

>>>2. If we have Rice all game, we probably win (as good as the other
>>>   WRs are, Rice is still better).

>Wouldn't have made much difference.  Every receiver they had could already
>outrun the Bills secondary.  Don't see why they'd need an especially fast one.

They'd have double-teamed Rice.  Could have made a difference.
-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
From: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com (Bob Ashley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Early Games ... PARTIAL SCORES UPDATE
Date: 13 Sep 92 17:40:54 GMT
Reply-To: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com
Organization: GTE Federal Systems Division


 
Sunday, 13 September - EARLY GAMES
 
        Dallas          17                      Minnesota        0
    1   NY Giants        0                  1   Detroit          7
 
        Green Bay        0
    1   Tampa Bay       14
 
        Atlanta          0
    2   Washington       7

Redskins score on a 5 yard pass to Ernest Byner from Mark Rypien on 3rd
down and 2 ... drive encompasses 13 plays, over 60 yards


Bob

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Ashley                        Internet:  Bob.Ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com

Software Engineer, (703)-818-4656  | Winter Leagues 1992-1993
   GTE Federal Systems Division    |    GTE FSD Mixed Secretary: Thu 17:45
   15000 Conference Center Drive   |    Thursday Mixups:         Thu 20:30
   Chantilly, VA   22021-3808      |    NFL Mixed Secretary:     Mon 21:00
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: psilva@techbook.com (Paul Silva)
Subject: Re: Cowboy Super Bowl (Was: Re: The Niners are the favorites.)
Organization: TECHbooks of Beaverton Oregon - Public Access Unix
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 21:45:37 GMT

tap1040@venus.tamu.edu (SPEED RACER) writes:
>psilva@agora.rain.com (Paul Silva) writes...
>> 
>>  From listening to media reports, game announcers and Dallas fans posting 
>>  to this newsgroup, it's ALMOST as if they think someone "owes" the Cowboys 
>>  a Super Bowl title.  They hadn't done anything consistantly for about a 

>..deleted blathering...  

  Yeah, some blathering hurts, doesn't it?

>>  Geez, give me a break!  At least the Niners have been beating teams
>>  of playoff caliber consistantly for the past decade. 
>
>Nobody thinks the Cowboys are "owed" a Super Bowl title.  The Cowboys plan
>on earning it like everybody else.
>I don't see where your hostility for us comes from.  Our team is now
>doing well, and we feel like doing a little woofing, as does everyone
>else whose team is doing well.  

  I have no hostility towards the Cowboys.  In fact, I'd like to see them 
  do well (except against the 49ers).  I'm just sick of the hype for a team 
  that hasn't yet done anything substantial to warrant all the accolades.

>And if we can't woof about our team of the 70's then you can't woof about
>your team of the 80's.  Fair is fair.  Besides we are talking about the
>here and now.  The Cowboys are for real.  I'm not saying we will be back
>in the Superbowl this year, but we will be winning consistently against
>those same playoff caliber teams you are harping about.
  
  There is a reason the 49ers have been either favored or co-favored to win
  the Super Bowl the past several years.  I'm sure you can figure it out.
  Does it mean they will?  No, of course not, but they have the organization
  to accomplish it and people recognize that.  If some day the Cowboys reach 
  that level, then great!

  Woof all you want using phrases like "will be winning...", but for some 
  of us, the jury is still out on the Cowboys.  

  ...Paul

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold)
Subject: Re: The Battle Of The Titans!
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 18:42:47 GMT

In article <6743@lhdsy1.lahabra.chevron.com>,
roat@rrc.chevron.com (Suzanne Roat,Chevron,(510)242-5313) writes:
>In article 6815@morrow.stanford.edu, GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold) writes:
>>
>>First let me congratulate the both teams for playing an outstanding
>>game!!!  Both teams were deserving of the victory.  Way to go
>>Buffalo and San Francisco!!  This could be the battle of the century
>>if these two teams make it to the Super Bowl!
>>
>>I'm still in awe of that awesome offensive display from both teams!
>>
>>
>>                                                  Tony
>>                                               GO 49ERS!!!
>
>
>And NO PUNTS!!!  When was the last time this happened?  Anybody know?

The last time the 49ers had a no punt game was October 20th, 1991
against the Lions.  Don't know when the last game was that neither
teams in an NFL game had no punts.

                                                    Tony
                                                 GO 49ERS!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: wlittle@nmsu.edu (Wes)
Subject: Dallas Kicking A**!!
Organization: NMSU Computer Science
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 20:09:39 GMT

Well it is looking good so far!  3rd Quarter of the Dallas v NY game
and the score is 34-7....!!  Dallas is rolling...I love it...

Go Cowboys!!!
From: evans@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Doug Evans - CIT Network Operations)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Keith McKeller
Date: 5 Sep 92 16:52:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <188cllINN8j@malibog.hal.COM>, rc@hal.COM (Rolland Crunk) writes...
> 
>Does anyone know the status of Bill's tight end Keith McKeller?
>Has he signed yet?

Yes. The Bills have no more holdouts.


                                  |                              Doug Evans
                                  | State University of New York at Buffalo
                                  |             evans@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu
From: johna@psdcae1.gvg.tek.com (John Abt)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Niners/Bills (gag)
Date: 14 Sep 92 18:54:42 GMT
Organization: Grass Valley Group, Grass Valley, CA

In article <d9xndga.mzimmers@netcom.com> mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:
....
>Now then, some puerile ranting:
>
>1. If we had anything resembling a placekicker, we win.
>
>2. If we have Rice all game, we probably win (as good as the other
>   WRs are, Rice is still better).
>
>3. Montana makes that last drive work.

4. Dana Hall get's a life, we win.

John Abt
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Instant Replay
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 04:47:45 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.191501.25268@cs.hut.fi> killer@robin.cs.hut.fi (Kalle Kivimaa) writes:
>In <1992Sep10.140553.5880@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>>It has to do with "unjust" calls that border on major stupidity!
>
>Unjust???  Do you imply that (NFL-)refs are biased?  (1/2 :)
>
Actually, what I meant by unjust is incorrect infractions or the
lack of not calling obvious infractions.

>>I can accept a team winning on a Hail Mary pass or by luck. I
>>cannot except the outcome of a game based on the Zebra dudes
>>making the wrong call.
>
>Please define 'luck'.  I personally include officiating mistakes
>in luck factor.  They happen infrequently, sometimes against you,
>sometimes for you.
>
Defining "luck" by your standards would be very difficult.  Here is
my attempt at defining luck:

Remember the "Immaculate Reception" by Franco Harris (remember Steeler 
Fans?)? Well, I considered that luck. Sure, it required some athleticism 
on Franco's part, but it was still luck in my book.  The Hail Mary catch by the
Falcon's against the Niner's was a lucky catch!  Just about every
article on the catch references or infers, that is was tipped and
fell on the Falcon's favor, i.e, as in luck.  A referee getting in the
way of a tackler and preventing the tackle and it results in a first down
or TD, is luck in my book.  Typically, IMHO, officating does not fall
in the catergory of luck.  I guess I could perhaps see how a wrong call
could be considered lucky. E.g., player clearly steps out of bounds, but
the Zebra crew does not see it, and player scores a winning 80 yard TD.
That is why I favor IR by the wasy.  Luck is when Young scrambled for dear 
life and ran about 20+ yards against the Vikings and scored a winning TD 
(remember Vike fans?).

>And BTW, WHAT should be included in IR?  Remeber Monk's touchdown,
>the IR couldn't have overthrown it if the ref had called for a
>forced out-of-bounds (It could have been either way from the replay).
>--
I didn't see the game, so I cannot really comment on it. Trust me, I
am by no means an expert in NFL rules and I will infer/imply this either.
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "I have great faith in fools - self-confidence my
   friends call it."        Edgar Allan Poe
From: rfedkiw@redwood.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Moron
Date: 9 Sep 92 01:42:38 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: UCLA Mathematics Department

In Article 28194, Tony Bechtold rambles
> ... blah blah blah...
> All the rest can't cut it against the strong NFC defenses.  The
> mighty Bills have proven this the last two years.
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Funny how two years ago the Giants LOST to the Bills in the regular
season. Even funnier is how the Giants played at home.
If you weren't such a moron you would've known that the Bills 
were favored to win because of that and they lost because 
their offense chocked, they missed the game winning field goal.

As for last year... the Bills were plagued by injuries and lost
to a better team. But if the Bills were healthy things 'might' 
have been different.
They played a hard schedule because they were in the Super Bowl the
year before, so they made it back but it was hard and took a lot
out of the team.
As for the Redskins, the yhad a cake schedule because they were 
wimps the year before. I bet this year they get hammered.

If San Fran does anything it's because of their easy schedule,
they weren't even a playoff team last year.

--
Ron Fedkiw (rfedkiw@redwood.math.ucla.edu)

A plan is made by someone who is sitting and thinking ...
while others are doing.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: seth@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (peter.r.clark..jr)
Subject: Re: Eagles Report
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 13:43:27 GMT
Keywords: Eagles 31 Cards 17

In article <1992Sep14.195049.27877@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>, jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes) writes:
> In article <1992Sep14.173350.2297@midway.uchicago.edu>, epc1@quads.uchicago.edu (Merlin) writes:
> > In article <1992Sep13.195049.27877@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>, jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes) writes:
> > Walker had some good runs and he got stuffed a couple of times.
> > He did, however, make the short 3rd down conversions in the game.
.
.
.
> 
> I think the Vikings fans are getting to you.  I'll let you in on a
> little secret, every back in the NFL gets stuffed.  How many times
> did Herschel get stuffed last nite?  Not many.  He was effective
.
.
.
> > >'Zel gets a big
> > >F for his performance with the rest of the defense getting a B.
> > >For the first time last night the Eagles defense missed Jerome Brown.
> > 
> > The defense missed alot of tackles.  They need to brush up on their
> > fundumentals.  If Phoenix were stronger, the defense would've looked
> > alot worse out there.  I would give the DBs and LBs a C.  The DL deserve
> > a B.  We need better tackling, better push up the middle, better 
> > blitzing, and a better Izel.  The defense looked average.
> > I think the Eagle's D needs to try harder because there isn't much of
> > a difference between a good D and an average one.
> 
> This is great!  We're raggin' on the defense because it gave up 14
> points and just a little over 200 total yards.  I'd say, we're a bit
> spoiled.  The secondary struggled, but no way the LBs get a C with the
> way Seth Joyner played.  He was everywhere!
> 
> E-A-G-L-E-S
> 
> Joe Dakes

Hey Joe, I think the WIP Izel haters club is getting to you. I'll let
you in on a little secret, every CB in the NFL gets burnt. How many
times did Izel get burnt Sunday? Not many...:-):-):-)

Let's remember that Izel's help consisted of John Booty, normally a
CB converted to safety because Hopkins and Miano were both hurt. When
you consider that the whole DB corps was lacking, I think Izel is getting
an undeserved bad rap on WIP (local all-sports radio station for those
not in the Philly area).

Izel is no Ben Smith, but he's not that bad either. Yes, you are
getting spoiled. Give "toast" a break...

pete
From: st1ge@Rosie.UH.EDU (Edward Hui)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Summerall/Lundquist/Madden (was: Re: NFL Announcers)
Date: 11 Sep 92 05:31:04 GMT
Reply-To: st1ge@Rosie.UH.EDU
Organization: University of Houston

In article <jjonsson.146@alexandria.lib.utah.edu>, jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu writes:
>I wonder how many of you noticed that the 49er/Giant game was done by Vern 
>Lundquist and John Madden, not Pat Summerall. Does anyone have the scoop on 
>Summerall, is he back in Alcohol treatment again?
>
     No, Summerall is covering the US Open.  For the first 2 weeks of the
regular season, Lundquist teams up with Madden.  After Summerall is back,
Lundquist will be back with Dan Fouts.

>
>Jeff Jonsson
>Marriott Library System Support, University of Utah.
>==============================================================================
>--"It's the sound of the secret--  jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
>-- machinery at the center of  --  jjonsson@utahlib.bitnet
>-- the world." -Cliff Steele   --  "You talkin' to me?"


Edward Hui
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com (Bob Ashley)
Subject: Re: Summerall/Lundquist/Madden (was: Re: NFL A
Reply-To: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com
Organization: GTE Federal Systems Division
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 21:12:35 GMT

In article 146@alexandria.lib.utah.edu, jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu () writes:
>I wonder how many of you noticed that the 49er/Giant game was done by Vern 
>Lundquist and John Madden, not Pat Summerall. Does anyone have the scoop on 
>Summerall, is he back in Alcohol treatment again?
>
>
>Jeff Jonsson
>Marriott Library System Support, University of Utah.
>==============================================================================
>--"It's the sound of the secret--  jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
>-- machinery at the center of  --  jjonsson@utahlib.bitnet
>-- the world." -Cliff Steele   --  "You talkin' to me?"


Pat Summerall is covering US Open Tennis for CBS.  He will debut with
John Madden in the season's third week, on 20 September 1992.

This happens every year ...


Bob - the DH game for that week is Lions-Skins   :-)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Ashley                        Internet:  Bob.Ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com

Software Engineer, (703)-818-4656  | Winter Leagues 1992-1993
   GTE Federal Systems Division    |    GTE FSD Mixed Secretary: Thu 17:45
   15000 Conference Center Drive   |    Thursday Mixups:         Thu 20:30
   Chantilly, VA   22021-3808      |    NFL Mixed Secretary:     Mon 21:00


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Bob Marshall)
Subject: Re: 49ers roster question
Reply-To: marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 20:41:30 GMT

In article <BuKvu4.9D7@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, jdt29225@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jazzy J ) writes:
>	I was wondering if good 'ol option QB Darian Hagan had made
>	the 49er roster as a WR/DB/KR or something like that.  I hadn't
>	heard about him in awhile.  Could someone fill me in on his
>	status?  Please e-mail -- I don't read this newgroup much.

Hagan was released in the preseason. The 49ers figured they had enough
kick returners and wide receivers.

=============================================================================
Bob Marshall                     \\     "It ain't age
Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.     \\     That makes me look this way
Sunnyvale, CA                      \\    It ain't the years, boys,
marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com\\   It's the miles"
"I tell the truth 'cept when I lie"  \\     - Chris LeDoux
=============================================================================
From: knight@iastate.edu (David P Bonthuis)
Subject: Percy Snow?
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 20:30:29 GMT

	Does anyone know whatever happened to Percy Snow?  Is he still with
the Chiefs and just not playing?  I know in his rookie year they only
played him in obvious run situations because he didn't defense the pass
very well.  I can't believe he would be cut.

Go CHIEFS!!!!!!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: torresce@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Carlos E. Torres)
Subject: Re: Bruce.
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 15:32:51 GMT


To those asking how can the Bills improve their offense - add new good people
so that they can have variety attacks!  (i.e. Gardner, and others) and add
plays like the throw directly to Thurman thomas to enhance the offense!  The
"D" does need improving, but with Smith back, they are (or will be) back near
the top (if no one else gets hurt)!
I think it will be close, but I think they will beat the 49ers.
	Mystic
(alex.soto@analog.com)

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bubba@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Gary Beason)
Subject: Re: Smith is NOT Sanders
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 01:29:44 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.002551.9794@bnr.ca> patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power) writes:

>|> 	I'm tired of those people who put any running back up against
>|> Barry.  Barry is the best and those fans of any other RB will have to
>|> wait until something bad happens to Barry.   As for outgaining Sanders
>|> again this year...it could be.  As far as I'm concerned, Smith could win
>|> the rushing title for the next five years, but he will never be as good
>|> as Barry.  Sorry dude.  I know how much you don't like what I'm saying,
>|> but the truth hurts sometimes, dammit.
>|> 
>|> 					- Tim
>
>       Show me the facts that proves Sanders is a better RB than Emmitt
>  or Thurman, and I'll gladly jump on the Barry Bandwagon.  But, there's
>  not one.  Sorry, dudette...

Oh, but Patrick, don't you know?  It's the way Barry "carries the
ball."    Oh, and being a myopic fanatic helps.  Simplifying talent
and the game also helps.

What I like is the way some people so completely miss the idea and
actually prove the point.


Gary Beason
bubba@mace.cc.purdue.edu
From: danb@pogo.wv.tek.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Afterthoughts on Raiders/Denver
Date: 10 Sep 92 15:29:09 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Wilsonville, OR.

Mark writes in part:

>Denver, on the other hand, was lucky - and while there is nothing
>wrong with being lucky, you cant count on it, and defensively and
>offensively they were really weak. 

Denver has continued to be one of the LUCKIEST teams in the NFL for something
like the last 8 years.  LUCK HELL!!!!  I agree that they looked pretty bad
thru most of the game, but when it was on the line they turned it up a notch
and won.  Denver has a habit of doing that.  Maybe the Broncos should head
to Vegas.

Dan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jeff@neuron.cs.tamu.edu (Jeff Goldberg)
Subject: Oiler holdout progress
Reply-To: Jeff@cs.tamu.edu
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Texas A&M University
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 05:01:28 GMT

Sean Jones: in
Dishman: may be in tomorrow morning
Fuller: no progress

This is according to channel 13 Houston sports (9/9/92).
--
           Jeff Goldberg                        
           College Station, Texas       
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pokey@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Vince Rhee)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Whereabouts of Summerall...
Date: 12 Sep 92 21:38:04 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: 1992-Beat-The-Hell-Outta-Everyone Aggies of Texas A&M


	I forgot who it was that was asking about the whereabouts
	of Pat Summerall, seemingly missing from the past
	weekends NFL coverage. Well, he'll be missing this weekend
	too; he's working the announcers booth at the U.S. [Tennis]
	Open, as he always does during its telecast by CBS.

- Vince

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      TTTTTTTTTTTTTT      Vince Rhee (Texas A&M '90, t.u. '92)        	|
|      T     TT     T      Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering	|  
|            TT            University of Texas at Austin               	|
|    AAA     TT   MM   MM  ===> Reply to : pokey@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu    	|
|   A   A    TT   M M M M                                              	|
|  AAAAAAA   TT   M  M  M  Texas A&M (AP #7,CNN/USA #8)(2-0-0,0-0-0)    |
|  A     A   TT   M     M     Last game: beat l.s.u. 31-22              | 
|           TTTT	      Next game: Sep 12 vs Tulsa                |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Re: Who's got the toughest schedule?
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 17:00:43 GMT

azjohn@eagle.larc.nasa.gov (John Paul Phillips) writes:
>Here's a posting by Gidi from a few months back.

Hey, I'm getting quoted on RSFP!  I made it!

>1:  Dallas (11-5)           146-110 (0.570)
> [...]
>28: Indianapolis (1-15)     112-144 (0.438)

Let me just remind y'all that these percentages (.570 and .438) are
roughly equivalent to 9-7 and 7-9, respectively.

Not a huge difference, in my opinion.

Anyway, here's another version of the strength-of-schedule ranking,
which shows the number of games against last year's playoff teams
[marked (p)], as well as the two teams with winning records that
didn't make the playoffs [marked (*)].

*** DISCLAIMER:  I ran this thing very quickly!  I hope there are no
*** errors, but there might be!

 1: Den  (p)  9+1	Rdrs Phil* KC Wash Hou NYJ Rdrs Dal Buf KC
 2: NYG       8+3	SF* Dal Chi Rdrs Wash Den Phil* Dal Wash KC Phil*
 3: Wash (p)  8+2	Dal Atl Det Den Phil* KC NO Dal Phil* Rdrs
 4: Dal  (p)  8+2	Wash Phil* KC Rdrs Phil* Det Den Wash Atl Chi
 5: Mia       8+1	Buf Atl NYJ Buf Hou NO SF* Rdrs NYJ
 6: Phil (*)  8+1	NO Den Dal KC Wash Dal Rdrs SF* Wash
 7: KC   (p)  8+1	Hou Rdrs Den Phil* Dal Wash NYJ Rdrs Den
 8: Sea       8+1	KC Dal Rdrs Wash Rdrs KC Den Phil* Den
 9: NO   (p)  7+3	Phil* Chi Atl SF* Det SF* Wash Atl Buf NYJ
10: Atl  (p)  7+2	NYJ Wash NO Chi SF* SF* Buf NO Dal
11: Rams      7+2	Buf NYJ SF* NO Atl Dal SF* NO Atl
12: Buf  (p)  7+1	SF* Rdrs NYJ Atl NYJ Den NO Hou
13: SF   (*)  7+1	Buf NYJ NO Atl Atl NO Phil* Det
14: Rdrs (p)  7+1	Den KC Buf Dal Phil* Den KC Wash
15: NE        7+1	Buf NYJ SF* Buf NO NYJ Atl KC
16: Phx       6+3	Phil* Dal Wash NO Phil* SF* Atl Dal Wash
17: SD        7  	KC Den Hou Den KC Rdrs Rdrs
18: Pitt      7  	Hou NYJ KC Hou Buf Det Chi
19: Minn      6+2	Det Chi Det Wash Chi Hou Phil* SF*
20: GB        6+1	Atl Chi Det Phil* Chi Det Hou
21: NYJ  (p)  6+1	Atl SF* Buf Den KC Buf NO
22: Det  (p)  6+1	Chi Wash NO Dal Hou Chi SF*
23: TB        6+1	Det Chi Det NO Chi Atl SF*
24: Chi  (p)  6  	Det NO Atl Hou Det Dal
25: Cin       6  	Rdrs Hou Hou Chi NYJ Det
26: Clev      6  	Rdrs Den Hou Chi Det Hou
27: Ind       5  	Hou Buf NYJ Buf NYJ
28: Hou  (p)  5  	KC Den Det Chi Buf


--Gidi


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro