HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: trier@slc6.ins.cwru.edu (Stephen C. Trier)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: How to register machine on Internet?
Date: 17 Nov 1992 20:02:57 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland OH (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc6.ins.cwru.edu

In article <1992Nov16.170259.16703@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> phart@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick S Hart) writes:
>   I was wondering if anyone knows how we can register our Unix machines so we 
>can be on the Internet?

If these machines are at Ohio State, figure out who runs your campus network
and ask them.  If you do not know who this is, talk to the sysadmin of a
machine that is on the network, or talk to the sysadmin of any computer labs
on campus.  They will know to whom you should talk.

If the computers are not at Ohio State, ftp to nic.ddn.mil, as another poster
suggested.

-- 
Stephen Trier                                     
Network Services Engineering, IRIS/INS/Telecom    
Case Western Reserve University                   
trier@ins.cwru.edu
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: pmh2962@tamsun.tamu.edu (Pat Hayes)
Subject:  Q: Wish to interconnect two PCs via LAN. A: WFW (?) 
Organization: Meteorology, TAMU, CS, TX
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 03:44:59 GMT

>First, some background.  I have 2 PC clones at home.  One is a
>1988-vintage 286/16 (AT clone) with a 40M HD.  The other is a multimedia
>486/33 with a Sound Blaster Pro card, a CD-ROM drive, a 105M HD, & Win
>
>1.  The first thing I wish to do is enable hard-drive sharing between
>systems.  What would be the best way to do this using freely available

... WFW does this.

>available (which I have heard is NOT the case).  Ideally I would like to
>have both machines be able to access each other's hard drives, but I
>doubt that I could do that under MS-DOS (even 5.0).

... WFW and DOS 5 do this.

>2.  Which freely available networking packages should I use?  I have
>heard about PC/IP, CUTCP, NCSA, KA9Q, and a host of applications, but I
>do not know which one would be best.

... me neither.  WFW ain't free --- $69, I think.

>3.  What other networking applications would be cool, froody, and hoopy
>to experiment/play with?  I anticipate I will mess around with most of
>the standard TCP/IP apps (FTP, Telnet, the r-series, etc), but I will
>always be interested in doing other cool things on my "house LAN."

... don't know for sure about this, but I think WFW can run on 286's.

>Chris Shutters     Preferred --> shutters_wc@toto.laafb.af.mil
-- 
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pat Hayes, Meteorology, Texas A&M University...<whoop!>...phayes@tamu.edu 
O&M 1008, TAMU, CS, TX 77843-3150....days:(409)845-1680 fax:(409)845-6331
From: ip_boss@degsyd.syd.deg.csiro.au (Jack Churchill)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: qvtnet-like alternative
Date: 20 Nov 92 21:10:47 +1000
Organization: CSIRO, Exploration Geoscience

Gee, qvtnet is certainly popular these days!  What's the nearest thing to
qvtnet for non-windows (i.e., just msdos) pcs?

-- 
  Jack N. Churchill                         | J.Churchill@syd.deg.csiro.au
** Unless otherwise specified, the opinions expressed here are my own. **
From: brettsch@ucunix.san.uc.edu (Steve Brettschneider)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: HELP!! Info needed!!
Summary: I need info on setting up a modem pool
Keywords: TCP/IP,Modem
Date: 16 Nov 92 22:26:30 GMT
Followup-To: brettsch@ucunix.san.uc.edu
Distribution: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Organization: University of Cincinnati

We are about to move our servers to a new location, and people (clients) want
to be able to access our machines via modem.  I am desperate.  Does anyone
know of anything that will let people dial into a modem pool, and then
connect to the machine of their choice?  This machine would be on an IP network.
(ie The Internet).

Please e-mail me any info that you might have, and thanks a whole bunch in
advance!

Steve Brettschneider
brettsch@ucunix.san.uc.edu
From: andy@eies2.njit.edu (Andy)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Need Help, am new to this!
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:18:19 GMT
Organization: NJIT - EIES2


Ok, these may be dumb questions, but ya gotta start somewhere ya know!

I call via modem from my IBM/PC to the Vax at NJIT to get to the Internet.

I want to be able to transfer files from my PC to my directory on the
Vax.

I am able to do this via Kermit.

I would like to be able to use Ymodem or Zmodem.  

I did an Archie search and found plenty of FTP's where I can get Zmodem
files.

Here are the problems:

Many of these FTP's are compressed with .Z or .tar
I don't know how to uncompress them.

The one's I've seen look like a bunch of pieces that I somehow have
to compile to make them work.
I have no idea how to do this.

Is there somewhere I can just get a fully working Zmodem and FTP 
it into my directory on the Vax and use it?

I'm really new at this and any help would be great!   Instead of 
wasting bandwith, Email me at ANDY@EIES2.NJIT.EDU if you would!

Thanks!
And
From: jbvb@FTP.COM ("James B. Van Bokkelen")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: Fragmented IP packets: any PD implementations?
Date: 17 Nov 92 17:06:05 GMT
Reply-To: jbvb@ftp.com
Distribution: world
Organization: The Internet


    In the real world, fragments are not terribly important...

True, but the commercial vendors encounter all sorts of oddball situations.
Once upon a time, when PC/TCP was less than a year old, we had a customer who
had a custom (few-of-a-kind) router that fragmented IP datagrams larger than
510 (what a number to pick) bytes.  So, in 1987 we put in reassembly that
would handle two fragments only.  That lasted until 1992, when we went the
rest of the way, to N fragments.  Some long-haul nets have *odd* MTUs, and
not all routers support enough ICMP to do MTU Discovery...

If you do it, read Dave Clark's RFC - it doesn't really take that much memory
unless you're getting lots of fragments coupled with significant packet loss.

James B. VanBokkelen		2 High St., North Andover, MA  01845
FTP Software Inc.		voice: (508) 685-4000  fax: (508) 794-4488

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: cornell@inoc.dl.nec.com (C.J.K.)
Subject: Re: SLIP8250?
Reply-To: cornell@syl.dl.nec.com
Organization: NEC USA, Corporate Network Administration Division (Dallas, TX)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:01:10 GMT

CSP1DWD@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU (Denis DeLaRoca 825-4580, 310) writes:

>CUTCP from Clarkson University can do VJ TCP Header Compression over
>slip links.


Has anyone used CUTCP with SLIP8250 packet driver to connect via
SLIP to a Sun Sparc?  When I use "vjc=yes", things don't work too
well (a connection is made but doesn't get any farther).  But when
I do "vjc=no" things work OK.

I'm using a Sun Sparc1 running SunOS4.1.1 and the slip-4.0 package
with the cslipbeta additions.  Is there a newer cslip for Sun available
somewhere?

Any hints would be quite welcome!

--- Cornell
| Cornell Kinderknecht          | Email: cornell@syl.dl.nec.com |
| CSTC/CNAD                     |  UUCP: uunet!necbsd!cornell   |
| NEC Systems Lab./NEC USA      | Phone: 214-518-3509           |
| Irving, TX (Dallas)           |   Fax: 214-518-3552           |
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc,comp.os.ms-windows.apps,bit.listserv.win3-l
From: cornell@syl.dl.nec.com (Cornell Kinderknecht)
Subject: wnqvtnet 3.03 and SLIP troubles
Keywords: slip packet fragment telnet windows
Reply-To: cornell@syl.dl.nec.com
Organization: NEC Systems Lab., C&C Software Technology Center (Dallas, TX)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 07:28:19 GMT

I downloaded wnqvtnet 3.03 and got it running OK over ethernet and
like it very much.  However, I'm having some troubles running it
over SLIP with both the ETHERSL and SLIP8250 Crynwr packet drivers.
(I've got a Sun Sparc1+ running SunOS4.1.1 on the other side of the
SLIP link)

With one of the packet drivers (I don't recall which right at the
moment), I get many of the following on the console:
	IP:bad version number
and a few packet checksum errors.

With the other packet driver, I get a lot of:
	IP:fragmented packet received, frags not support
	IP:bad version number

Does anyone have any suggestions?  What should be used for mtu and
segment size values?  I've used this same SLIP link with KA9Q and
the Cutcp (NCSA) stuff.  It works OK with them although performance
isn't that hot.

My equipment and software:
	Sun Sparc1+ with SunOS4.1.1
		running slip version slip-4.1.1
	NEC Powermate 386 running DOS5.0 and MSWindows3.1
	Telebit T1600 modems on both sides (9600 baud)
	wnqvtnet 3.03
	Either ETHERSL or SLIP8250 p.d. from Crynwr

--- Cornell Kinderknecht
-- 
| Cornell Kinderknecht          Email: cornell@syl.dl.nec.com |
| CSTC/CNAD                      UUCP: uunet!necbsd!cornell   |
| NEC Systems Lab./NEC USA      Phone: 214-518-3509           |
| Irving, TX (Dallas)             Fax: 214-518-3552           |
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: rivero <rivero@cc.unizar.es>
Subject: FTPing to LPT1? (or: cheap PC LPD)
X-Xxdate: Sat, 14 Nov 92 11:38:44 GMT
Organization: fisica teorica UZ
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 10:41:14 GMT

As a lot of people, I continue my quest for a simple way to PC-printing...

Our last idea was so simple that I dont understand why it doesnt works:

Ftp your.pc.name
put the_file LPT1
quit

I have tried it in PCs running FTPSRV and QvtNet. The first, from pc-tcp,
rejects to open it (bad file number, it says). But QvtNet is a better guy,
it tries to open and windows 3.x show the System Error message:
  									"I can not open device LPT1"

The question here is, why cannt it open the device? Is it already opened
by QvtNet? QvtNet sucessfully uses LPT1 to make "underground
printing" from telnet sessions, so it is not a authorization problem.

Any suggestion? Coun Win3.x or Qvtnet be modified to let us open LPT1?

Alejandro Rivero
Fisica Teorica
Zaragoza Univ, Spain.
From: waverheu@vub.ac.be ("Verheulpen W.")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: winqvt & PCNFS
Date: 16 Nov 92 13:59:52 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Internet

I just downloaded this new version of winqvt/net. I just read a few
notes in the qvtnet.ini file about stuff not needed by PC-NFS version.
Can anyone shed some light on this PC-NFS version. I saw no mention
in the *.wri files (or did I miss it :-))
Qvtnet version is 3.03 now ?!

--
====================================================================
Willy Verheulpen                            Systems Coordination
                   Institute for Molecular Biology
Brussels Free University                                 Belgium
I-------------------------------------I----------------------------I
I Bitnet :   waverheu@bbrbfu60.bitnet I Things tend to get worse   I
I Intern :   waverheu@vub.ac.be       I under pressure (Murphy)    I
I_____________________________________I____________________________I
Usual Disclaimer: No connection with any commercial product.
====================================================================
From: jrd@cc.usu.edu (Joe Doupnik)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: ETHERSL vs. SLIP8250
Date: 23 Nov 92 10:39:47 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <By6AJG.B9H@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, tmkk@uiuc.edu (Khan) writes:
> 
> In article <cornell.722071699@texas> cornell@syl.dl.nec.com (Cornell Kinderknecht) writes:
>>I downloaded wnqvtnet 3.03 and got it running OK over ethernet and
>>like it very much.  However, I'm having some troubles running it
>>over SLIP with both the ETHERSL and SLIP8250 Crynwr packet drivers.
> 
> What is the difference between these two? I've been using SLIP8250 and
> it seems to work OK with some apps (such as CUTCP, and NUPOP) but not
> others (FTP Software's PC/TCP can't load the ETHDRV kernel, anything based
> on WATTCP pukes, and TRUMPET can connect and read news but seems unable
> to post). The WATTCP docs mention something called ETHERSLIP, and an ftp
> site is listed, but I looked there and the specified path does not exist.
> What is ETHERSL and/or ETHERSLIP? Will it work better than SLIP8250?
-------------
	Etherslip is an adaptation by Paul Martineau of the old SLIP8250
Packet Driver and it attempts to provide an Ethernet interface to applications.
It creates a fake Ethernet hardware address and it fakes ARP packets. Because
it is based on the old item it probably locks up some machines (loss of serial
port interrupts, a design issue solved below).
	SLIP8250 is a regular SLIP Packet Driver and presents a SLIP interface
to applications. Thus the apps need to understand SLIP. I rewrote SLIP8250,
and that's what you probably have (Crynwr, edition 10). I also rewrote parts
of Etherslip and gave the material back to Paul, but I've heard nothing on
it for almost a year now. Questions and comments on Etherslip should be sent 
to him.
	SLIP8250 does NOT do VJ header compression, as a glance at the source
file will verify.
	CUTCP understands SLIP, as does MS-DOS Kermit v3.12, but NCSA Telnet
does not (at least the version I have here), nor do many other DIX Ethernet-only
programs. And so far Kermit is the only pgm to also use ODI directly (no shim),
so a large number of media are available: Ethernet(s), Token Ring(s), Arcnet, 
etc. That means Kermit can use PPP when that ODI driver becomes available to 
the public.
	To repeat an old song: please fellas (developers), let's get ODI
support into these programs. All the docs are available, from netlab2.usu.edu
as well as from Novell's machines.
	Joe D.
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: cctr132@csc.canterbury.ac.nz
Subject: Re: Available telnetD vendors
Organization: University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 01:36:56 GMT

In article <br.pct.27.721541712@RLG.Stanford.EDU>, br.pct@RLG.Stanford.EDU
(Peter C Tam) writes:

>   Pardon me, I remenber seeing a reply to such question 
>   "List of Telnet Server under MSDOS preferrably multi-sessions"
>   a few weeks ago. I suddenly need such information myself.

Apart from those mentioned by Erick E. in his followup, I think the
article you mention also said something about using the telnetd to
access PC/DOS hosted CD-ROM databases.  I kept a copy of that article
(see excerpt below) -- if you'd like the full article (which doesn't
really add anything more worth knowing), email me and I'll send it.

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 Nick FitzGerald, PC Applications Consultant, CSC, Uni of Canterbury, N.Z.
 n.fitzgerald@csc.canterbury.ac.nz  (64)(3)  364-2337 Voice,  364-2332 FAX


**************************************************************

I don't have an answer for Bob about using DOS emulators 
but there is another option other than Logicraft or Virtual Microsystems.  I 
have just gone through a review of the options for accessing DOS based CD-
roms fromnon-DOS based machines and come up with a DOS TELNET server which 
works VERY WELL.  It is called Everywhere Access from Superior Network 
Software in Warsaw, Ontario, Canada.

  This package will run on a DOS machine and allow access to it via TELNET
standard connections from any VT100 compatible device.  It imposes a 
minimal hit on the DOS machine and is very stable.  It is much more useful 
than other DOS telnet servers I have seen such as the Waterloo TELNETD 
package and the B&W TCP/IP for DOS v. 3 telnet server.  It is possible to
multi-task it under DESQVIEW or Windows (if you have the correct tcp/ip 
stack support) although I have not yet had a chance to try that out.  An OS
/2 version is under development.  Cost is about $150 Canadian per copy.
  For anyone who is interested in accessing DOS applications in a tcp/ip 
environment it is well worth a look.  Contact inf@snsi.com or
snsi!info@uunet.ca for more information.

**************************************************************
From: CSP1DWD@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU (Denis DeLaRoca 825-4580, 310)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: Re: SLIP8250?
Date: 17 Nov 92 02:16:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Internet

>  I'm probably wrong, but I know of no free MS-DOS TCP applications
>  that do compressed SLIP, so things might work better if you changed
>  your host to do standard SLIP.

CUTCP from Clarkson University can do VJ TCP Header Compression over
slip links.

-- Denis

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc,comp.os.os2.networking
From: shiva@well.sf.ca.us (Kenneth Porter)
Subject: Token Ring wiring
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 04:34:20 GMT

I've got a couple of PS/2 Model 95's with both Token Ring and
Ethernet cards. We use the Ethernet cards for NFS and printer-sharing
(the net is shared with Sun's and DOS boxes), but the Token Rings,
which were bundled with the PS/2's, are sitting idle. I'd like to try
using them for some experiments (I have the NDIS drivers), but I
don't know how the cabling works. I'm used to thin-net cabling, where
one just runs a hunk of coax between stations and puts a terminator
on the ends of the coax.

Each Token Ring card came with a cable with a strange multi-spade
connector at the end. How do I connect the two station cables
together to make a ring? Do I need some kind of expensive hub box, or
can I just fashion an adapter to directly connect the two cables
together?
From: peter@palin.cc.monash.edu.au (Peter Hawkins)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: REQ: MSDOS TCP/IP stack in ASM or Pascal
Date: 18 Nov 92 23:48:55 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.

I need to interface a turbo pascal (V6) application to TCP/IP. The
application is heavily OOP & TVision etc so I pretty well am forced
to use turbo pascal. It's huge & re-writing in C is not practical.
I could use novell IPX & Banyan Vines, but I want it to be more
general if I can.

I got a copy of wattcp - a mixture of asm & C, and compiled it with
BCC, but unfortunately I couldn't link the C & pascal object files
without leaving unresolved externals - Borland's advice was that
interfacing C to Pascal will not work with any C code which is either
not-straightforward (in calling) or which utilises intrinsic libraries.
(They advised against my attempting it - and suggested I re-write the
TCP/IP stack in pascal!)

Before embarking on a major project such as re-writing the stack, or
giving up and using IPX and Vines, I thought I'd try and see if anyone
knew:

1)  What public domain / commercial TCP/IP stacks are there which might
    be callable from turbo C?

2)  Are there any stacks around written entirely in assembly or (joy of
    joys!) pascal?

Thanks in advance,

Peter

-- 
Peter Hawkins,
Assistant Lecturer, Computer Centre
Monash University, Australia
peter@palin.cc.monash.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
From: gt@rundart.demon.co.uk (Giles Todd)
Subject: Re: What terminal emulation for KA9Q (NET.EXE) telnet? 
Distribution: world
Organization: Rundart Limited
Reply-To: gt@rundart.demon.co.uk
X-Mailer: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.18)
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 01:30:56 +0000


In article <claude.722170816@bauv106> claude@bauv106.bauv.unibw-muenchen.de writes:

>The terminal type is determined by the module ANSI.SYS at your MS-DOS
>side running KA9Q's NOS. Usualy the functionality is not sufficient.
>The common way is to replace ANSI.SYS by NANSI.SYS and to include a
>specific entry in /etc/termcap at the other side if it's running 
>bsd-UNIX. This works very well here. NANSI.SYS and the /etc/termcap
>entry can be downloaded from SIMTEL20.
>
>Do not forget to set the correct terminal type at the begin of your
>TELNET session, e.g.:
>        setenv TERM nansi

vt102.zip (which is available for ftp from ftp.demon.co.uk:/pub/DIS)
contains a hack of NNANSI.SYS which does not require changes to the
termcap entries at the host end.  Just set "TERM=vt102" (or vt100).  It
isn't perfect - line wrap doesn't work properly and there are no
function keys - but source is included.  If anyone gets around to fixing
the line wrap problem, would they please send me a patch?

Giles.
-- 
Giles Todd                      gt@rundart.demon.co.uk (Internet)
Voice: +44 925 33472            PGP 2.0 public key available.
Rundart Ltd, 5 Brentnall Close, Great Sankey, Warrington, WA5 1XN, UK
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc,comp.os.os2.networking
From: tmkk@uiuc.edu (Khan)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: ETHERSL vs. SLIP8250
Date: 23 Nov 92 14:21:14 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana


In article <cornell.722071699@texas> cornell@syl.dl.nec.com (Cornell Kinderknecht) writes:
>I downloaded wnqvtnet 3.03 and got it running OK over ethernet and
>like it very much.  However, I'm having some troubles running it
>over SLIP with both the ETHERSL and SLIP8250 Crynwr packet drivers.

What is the difference between these two? I've been using SLIP8250 and
it seems to work OK with some apps (such as CUTCP, and NUPOP) but not
others (FTP Software's PC/TCP can't load the ETHDRV kernel, anything based
on WATTCP pukes, and TRUMPET can connect and read news but seems unable
to post). The WATTCP docs mention something called ETHERSLIP, and an ftp
site is listed, but I looked there and the specified path does not exist.
What is ETHERSL and/or ETHERSLIP? Will it work better than SLIP8250?
From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Driver for FriendlyNet Adapter
Date: 18 Nov 92 02:14:58 GMT
Organization: Crynwr Software

In article <Dave-171192041115@134.29.65.179> Dave@vax2.winona.msus.edu writes:

   
   I need a driver for a FriendlyNet Adapter that is attached to a
   Zenith laptop   computer(325L).  I want to run NCSA Telnet on this
   but I can't find a driver. Does anyone know where I can get such a
   thing.  I could also use a driver that runs with LAN Workplace for
   DOS.  Thanks very much.

Um, FriendlyNet refers to the external Ethernet transceiver.  But
yes, there is a Z-Note packet driver.  It's
cheetah.ece.clarkson.edu:pub/znote.zip, encrypted with a zip password
of snurple (use ``pkunzip -ssnurple znote'' to decrypt).

-russ <nelson@crynwr.com> What canst *thou* say?
Crynwr Software           Crynwr Software sells packet driver support.
11 Grant St.              315-268-1925 Voice  |  LPF member - ask me about
Potsdam, NY 13676         315-268-9201 FAX    |  the harm software patents do.
From: R.Thirlby@lut.ac.uk
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: Let's write a FAQ file.
Date: 18 Nov 92 08:18:39 GMT
Reply-To: R.Thirlby@lut.ac.uk (Rob Thirlby)
Organization: Loughborough University, UK.

How about
     Where do i get SLIP for my a) SUN/HP b) for my PC
	Why doesnt CSLIP work with various packet drivers..
From: pf@leissner.se (Peter Fassberg)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: PCBridge och KarlBridge for Packet Drivers anywhere ?
Date: 16 Nov 92 00:17:38 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Internet

Where can I find PCBridge or KarlBridge pre-compiled
for Packet Drivers ?

Unfortunately I don't have access to a C compiler.


--  Peter Fassberg                E-mail: pf@leissner.se
    Leissner Data AB
    P.O. Box 912
    S-461 29  TROLLHATTAN
    SWEDEN