HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hodas@saul.cis.upenn.edu (Josh Hodas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.wanted,misc.forsale.computers
Subject: Times Running Out: New Toshiba 3301 CD-ROM Drives (external) for $450
Date: 17 Aug 92 22:37:14 GMT
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


As I wrote last week, I have gotten a good deal on Toshiba XM3301B CD-ROM
that enables me to resell a few for about $450.  I must, however, determine
my total order quantity in the next few days. So if you are interested
in getting one of these, let me know as soon as possible.

These are new drives, in an enclosure, with the latest Toshiba Mac driver,
a SCSI system cable, and a disk caddy.

Note, this is the current Toshiba model, with a 325ms average access.
This is a faster drive than the 3201. I have also been told (by someone on
comp.unix.aux) that the drive is fully A/UX compatible.

The drives have a one year warranty.

The price is fairly firm, but may be a bit negotiable. Make an offer.

Josh
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Hodas    		Home Phone:	     (215) 222-7112   
4223 Pine Street	School Office Phone: (215) 898-9514
Philadelphia, PA 19104	E-Mail Address:      hodas@saul.cis.upenn.edu
From: hinr@hobo.ECE.ORST.EDU (Robert Hinz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: PB HD Warning
Date: 18 Aug 92 04:20:22 GMT
Organization: ECE Dept.,OSU,Corvallis

In article <l8l9dnINNnrc@dimebox.cs.utexas.edu> werner@cs.utexas.edu (Werner Uhrig) writes:
>
>	the manual states to shut it down (but it does not enumerate or
>	warn about the exact concerns and dangers);
>
>	I suspect that "sleeping" would be ok sometimes, EXCEPT that
>	as the machine is still on, the battery gets drained (faster)
>	and that motion and pressures might cause the drive to wake/spin
>	up, and that would be BAD NEWS indeed....
>
An interesting twist...on the PB 100 booting the machine requires that you
press a key. Un-Sleeping the machine is accomplished in the same manner. 
When you boot the machine the HD spins up. When you 'wake' the machine up
the HD does not spin up. If the heads are parked when sleeping, is it 
safer to transport a sleeping PB 100 than a Shut Down one? Probably the best
way is to Shut Down and turn off the battery switch. I'm sure you all will
do that every time! ;-). Another issue regarding the PB 100. The PB 100 does
not loose the RAM disk when Shut Down. This means that power is maintained
to the RAM in the Shut Down state. Why then would Sleep be any worse for
battery drain. Just some food for thought!

Rob Hinz
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Oregon State University
hinr@ece.orst.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: tlt38517@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Terry Thiel)
Subject: Re: Alternatives to Apple's 13in color monitor (long)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 22:47:50 GMT

FYI Generation Systems and Mirror are the same company.  They just slap another
$100 on their moitors and sell them through other mail order places and stores.
They are exactly the same monitors that Mirror sells through their name via mai
l order.
-Terry

Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: matt@gbrmpa.gov.au (Matt)
Subject: Need info on Mac Memory Specs
Organization: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 06:57:06 GMT

Hi,
	We're about to install another 4 meg's of Ram in a portable,
what are the specs for the SIMS (i assume that's what they use) ?

I figure they're 1Meg x 9 SIMMS?

thanks for any info, please email

matt - Systems Support - GBRMPA.
Xref: sparky comp.sys.mac.hardware:15513 comp.sys.mac.system:11109 comp.sys.mac.misc:15083
From: stanger@otago.ac.nz (Nigel Stanger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Problem:  SE formats HD floppy as DD, but LC rejects it...why?
Date: 19 Aug 92 00:20:54 GMT
Organization: University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

dlb5404@tamsun.tamu.edu (Daryl Biberdorf) writes:
> In article <1992Aug17.210234.26897@midway.uchicago.edu> jcav@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>>In article <1992Aug17.200351.2274@twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com> darylb@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Daryl Biberdorf) writes:
>>>using.  My 1.4 MB drive has no problem at all recognizing and properly
>>>using 720K diskettes without being told which it is.
>>
>>Yes, but does it properly recognize 1.4M disks that have been formatted 720K?
> 
> Yes.  I personally tried it this afternoon.  The test machine was
> a Compaq 486/33L running DOS 5.0, using the B: drive (3.5" HD).
> I formatted a HD diskette using that drive to 720K (FORMAT B: /F:720),
> and was able to read and write to it just fine.  I've never had problems
> doing this on any machine I've tried.

Well, I just tried formatting a 1.44 as 720 on the old NEC
PowerMate gathering dust in the corner of my office, and it
barfed all over the place (it is a rather old machine though).
Last year we also had a batch of PowerMate 3's (?) in our student
labs, which would quite happily format 720 disks as HD. Then when
they came to me with a problem, my machine wouldn't recognise the
disks until I covered the hole. Maybe it's just old hardware at
work...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nigel Stanger,                  Internet: stanger@otago.ac.nz
University of Otago,            Phone: +64 3 479-8179
Dunedin, NEW ZEALAND.           Fax:   +64 3 479-8311
Peggy Babcock. Peggy Babcock. Peggy Babcock.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: robmacf@dep (Robert Macfarlane)
Subject: Changing SCSI ID on Apple 80 ex-internal?
Followup-To: poster
Reply-To: robmacf@philo.mcgill.ca
Organization: McGill University, Montreal, Canada 
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 16:28:42 GMT

Hi all,

Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I haven't been following this
group for a while.

I want to mount an ex-internal Apple 80 (Quantum ProDrive LPS)
in an external box, and I need to know which jumpers set the
SCSI ID.  Should I also be worrying about SCSI termination?
Do these drives have terminating resistors on them somewhere?

Thanks for any help you can offer...

Cheers,

Rob Macfarlane
Faculty of Arts Computer Lab
McGill University

Xref: sparky comp.sys.mac.hardware:15183 comp.sys.mac.apps:13217
From: dsj@alice.att.com (David S. Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Which is better: 9 or 17?
Keywords: Mac IIsi, simms
Date: 13 Aug 92 03:23:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: alice.23436
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ


Question to the net:  What are the pro's and con's of upgrading
a 5-Meg Mac IIsi to 17 Meg rather than 9 Meg?

The price through MacConnection looks like $260 for 9 Meg
and $480 for 17.  I'd probably buy the Maxima extension as
well in either case, so I could use all 9 (14 of the 17) Meg
without turning on 32-bit addressing.

My natural inclination would be to get the bigger upgrade, but
I fear I might simply be wasting the extra $220, given the
way I use the machine (I'm only just now starting to feel
that 5 Meg is not enough).  The cheaper
upgrade will increase my available (non-system) RAM by over
a factor of 2 (2.5 Meg to 6 or more, depending on how many new
extensions I add to the system once I have the space).
It is plausible to me that it will be at least two more years,
if ever, before this starts feeling too small.  By then, the price
of four 4-Meg simms might well be down to less than the $220 extra
I'd have to pay now (and there might even still be some market
value in the 2 Meg simms I'd have to remove).

So: what issues may I be missing?

What kinds of individual programs (or combinations of programs)
are likely to make me feel that 6 Meg is not enough?  My main
uses are MacDraw Pro (for drawing techical illustrations)
and Excel, although at some point I may want to get one of
the cheaper page layout programs to do a local school newsletter.
Would a large ram disk (one way to use all that extra memory)
be of major value?

Any thoughts/suggestions would be welcome.

David Johnson
dsj@research.att.com
From: ram@cs.umb.edu (Robert Morris)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: Offset from laser output
Date: 18 Aug 92 15:25:52 GMT
Reply-To: ram@cs.umb.edu
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Boston

In article <1992Aug16.003852.9329@news.columbia.edu> gmw1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Gabe M Wiener) writes:
From: lsr@taligent.com (Larry Rosenstein)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: Disadvantages of System 7 (Was: IIsi vs new Macs - should I wait?)
Date: 21 Aug 92 01:51:05 GMT
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.mac.misc
Organization: Taligent, Inc.

In article <1992Aug20.111042.5144@newstand.syr.edu>, isr@rodan.acs.syr.edu
(Michael S. Schechter - ISR group account) wrote:
> 
> Well, having used both extensivley, and being responsible for 
> about a dozen 7's and about 30 608's my opinion is that there is no
> real difference unless you're into playing with your computer instead
> of _using_ your computer.

My wife (not a hacker) would disagree.  She takes advantage of aliases and
the Finder's Find command.

Larry Rosenstein
Taligent, Inc.

lsr@taligent.com
From: gerlach@greyrock.mso.colostate.edu (Scott Gerlach)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: PowerBook 145 2/80
Date: 13 Aug 92 14:20:43 GMT
	<1992Aug9.165323.15098@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Organization: Computer Training & Support Services, Colorado State University

In article <1992Aug9.165323.15098@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> geoffb@coos.dartmouth.edu (Geoff Bronner) writes:

>In <1683BFF99.UC572722@mizzou1.missouri.edu> UC572722@mizzou1.missouri.edu (Matt Skipton) writes:

>>  Does anyone know if/when Apple is going to release the 145 in a 2/80
>>configuration?  My schools computer store has partnumbers for 4/40 and
>>4/80 configs but they said that Apple hasn't given them a # for a 2/80.

>I asked an Apple Rep that very question at MacWorld and he had NO IDEA. I
>strongly suggested that they release a 2/80 configuration but who knows if
>he has any say on the matter.

Why would you want a machine with only 2MB RAM?  I don't even use very
high-powered software on my Mac, and 4MB is just barely enough.
Buying a 2MB PB 145 is like begging to pay for a RAM upgrade within
the next 2-6 months.  4MB should be the minimum configuration for all
new machines IMHO.

Scott
--
Disclaimer: My opinions don't necessarily reflect those of my school or
my employer, but it's great when they do.

************************************************************************
* Scott Gerlach                   | gerlach@greyrock.mso.colostate.edu *
*								       *
* "No, I'm from Iowa... I only work in space." -James T. Kirk (ST:TVH) *
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: stu5s11@bcrka280.bnr.ca (David Simmons 1342678)
Subject: Re: PB 140/170 Power Supply
Reply-To: stu5s11@bnr.ca (David Simmons 1342678)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Canada
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 16:56:14 GMT

In article <1992Aug07.125615.875@sunfs3.Camex.COM> kent@sunfs3.Camex.COM
(Kent Borg) writes:
>
>General Question: Could someone tell me roughly how the Powerbook
>power circuitry is layed out?  My current guess is that the coax
>connector goes straight through to the internal battery, and that
>there are voltage regulators coming off there for actually powering
>things.  Correct?
>
>Specific question: Can I just plug a 6 volt lead acid battery into the
>coax connector?  
>
>
>--
>Kent Borg                                   kent@camex.com or kentborg@aol.com
>                                            H:(617) 776-6899  W:(617) 426-3577
>As always, things look better when some costs are left out.
>

Coax? I'm not sure what you mean. If you mean the power cord, it isn't
really a coax cable.

Anyways, You shouldn't use a normal power supply with the Powerbook. Apple
has design a special power supply with some kind of foldback limiting.
It doesn't actually supply a constant voltage all the time.

Ok, I've found the tech note. The power supply will supply a constant current
up to 7..5 V. This is so that when the battery is being charges it is receiving
the full amount of current it can take in. When the voltage reaches 7.5
volts, the
power supply switches to the constant voltage mode. The voltage then
stays between
7.5 and 7.9 Volts, depending on the current being drawn.

There is also a foldback region. When the voltage is below 5 volts, the
current drop
from it maximum of 2 Amps. This is for short circuit protection.

So it's not just a simple power supply. so don't try plugging one in.
There's a good
chance of damaging the battery of poewr charging circuitry. You might
end up needing
a motherboard swap costing thousands. At worst your powerbook could
burst into flames.
(apparently they burn really nice under the right conditions. Ones with
improperly
installed Enviso Adapters make really nice flames I've heard.)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Andrusiak
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: zben@ni.umd.edu (Charles B. Cranston)
Subject: Re: Connecting two monitors as clones?
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Organization: UM Home for the Terminally Analytical
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 01:26:58 GMT

In article <BtCttH.IJG@cgl.ucsf.edu>,
edman@socrates.ucsf.edu (Jeff Edman) wrote:
 
> Does anyone know if it is possible to connect two monitors to MacIIci
> in such a fashion that they are both showing the same screen (including
> desktop, menus, etc)? I would like have a second monitor that could be
> used in another room while the other is not in use? I would prefer not
> to reconfigure the monitors each time using the Monitors control panel.

There was a posting on this list many moons ago claiming that it is
indeed possible to have overlapping monitors.  The "monitors" control
panel prevents you from placing one monitor over another, but this
posting claimed one can edit the system resource containing the
monitors setup to give two monitors overlapping (or even identical)
rectangles, and get the descrived behavior.

I've never tried to do this.  In fact, I've tried to think through the
ramifications for some programs I have written, and decided that my
programs could sometimes make inappropriate decisions about just what
kind of graphics to display (for example, CopyBitsing from the 8 bit
deep offscreen pixmap rather than the 4 bit deep pixmap etc).  Thus
the results one gets may depend on what applications one is running.
Be warned!

zben@ni.umd.edu     -KA3ZDF
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.misc
From: kanefsky@src.honeywell.com (Steve Kanefsky)
Subject: Re: Problem:  SE formats HD floppy as DD, but LC rejects it...why?
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 15:59:53 GMT

In article <1992Aug17.235741.7751@twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com> darylb@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Daryl Biberdorf) writes:
>In article <1992Aug17.223223.15534@tamsun.tamu.edu> bpb9204@tamsun.tamu.edu (Brent) writes:
>
>Scenario A:  You are copying software on a Mac Plus at school, and all
>you have in your backpack is a high density disk.  You format your
>disk to 800K ('cuz it's a Plus) and go home.  You insert the disk
>into your brand new IIsi ;), and the wonderful "Yo dude, wanna format
>that?" message comes up.  This is silly behavior.  Why can't the Mac
>read the disk, perhaps informing you that continuing to use the disk
>formatted to the wrong capacity is dangerous?
>
>I'm not *advocating* routinely formatting HD disks to 800K, but there
>are times when it's necessary.  I think using HD disks in this manner
>is risky as well, but of all the times I've done this in the DOS
>world, it has yet to cost me any data.

You forgot about losing data the other way around, which is much more
common in the PC world.

>In my example I formatted a HD disk to 720K.  When I did a directory
>on the formatted diskette, DOS did not ask me if I wanted to format
>it "correctly."  It listed the directory and when on its happy way.
>
>I thought the Mac was supposed to make life easier for users?


There are definitely faults on both sides:

On the Mac side, you might format an HD disk as 800K, then put it in a mac
with an HD drive which won't recognize it.  If you're smart, you know to
just cover the hole and if you're not, you know immediately that something's
gone wrong.  Also, this only happens when you use Macs which have been
long since discontinued in combination with newer Macs.

On the PC side, you might format an 800K disk as HD, and you'll probably
have to dig around in a manual to figure out how to do otherwise (but most
people will never even realize that the PC was too dumb to figure out how
to format the disk).  Your data will appear OK, and you might never know
you did anything wrong until one day when your data is corrupted.  It may
be days, weeks, months, or years after you originally formatted the disk,
and you may have stored or modified valuable data on it.  This can and does
happen with the latest PCs, and isn't restricted to the case where you use
obsolete PCs in combination with newer PCs.

--
Steve Kanefsky


Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: ggloor@kean.ucs.mun.ca
Subject: Re: Truth in Advertising (can the PowerBook talk?)
Organization: Memorial University. St.John's Nfld, Canada
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 14:53:15 GMT

In article <4693@news.duke.edu>, king@acpub.duke.edu (King Rhoton) writes:
> 
> From king Wed Aug 19 16:33:53 1992
> To: /afs/acpub/users5/king/.article
> 
> Talking moose does come with a hacked verion of macintalk.
From: hanser@rand.org (Lawrence M. Hanser)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Powerbook 100 batteries - non-Apple source wanted
Date: 18 Aug 92 22:24:27 GMT
Organization: RAND
X-UserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d7
X-XXDate: Tue, 18 Aug 92 23:25:31 GMT

Is anyone aware of a second source for PB100 batteries or chargers? 
E-mail to me and I'll summarize for the net.

Larry
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: coronell@athena.mit.edu (Dan Coronell)
Subject: Printer Woes w/System 7
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Distribution: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 19:47:35 GMT

	We have a Mac IIsi and a Mac SE30 connected to an HP LaserJet III 
printer via AppleTalk. No problems running both on system 6. Upon converting 
the IIsi to system 7.0 w/Tuneup 1.1.1, a number of problems related to 
printing have occurred. With background printing turned ON, a message is 
displayed which states that a printer needs to be chosen from Chooser. 
Doing this (choosing the LaserJet driver in Chooser) has no effect, same 
message appears. With background printing turned OFF, printing is possible 
sometimes while occasionally we are prompted to load a valid LaserJet Prep 
file despite the fact that one is in the System Folder. What could be the 
problem? This is a very busy printer (many users) and I would be most 
grateful if someone could help us via e-mail or posting to this newsgroup.

					Dan Coronell
					coronell@athena.mit.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: wuby@leland.Stanford.EDU (Cheng-Hsiu Wu)
Subject: IBM PS/2->AppleTalk->Apple Laserwriter?
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 92 05:04:57 GMT

Hello, netters,

This may be a FAQ, but I don't follow this group very much. Could someone
tell me if it's possible to connect a micro channel IBM PS/2 to the Apple Laser
Writer through the AppleTalk Network? What kind of interface does that and 
where can I get it, if any?
Thanks in advance!

C. Wu

Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: an780@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Travis Grundke)
Subject: PowerBooks Talking?
Reply-To: an780@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Travis Grundke)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 01:25:59 GMT


Folks, I think the phrase in the PowerBook ads: "It can talk" means that
it can communicate with other platforms, and more importantly, it has
built-in networking and damned good telecommunications support (IE-
AppleTalk Remote Access)
-- 
         Travis Grundke- Contributing Editor, MacinPlay Digest
                      an780@cleveland.freenet.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
    MacinPlay Digest: The first magazine dedicated to Macintosh Gaming.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: collet@scripps.edu (Thomas Collet)
Subject: RAM upgrade on compact Mac (new posting)
Organization: The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 17:26:01 GMT

Sorry for the last, messed-up posting.
My question is: if you work on a compact mac,
e.g., an SE/30, does it help to pull off the
socket of the CRT ? Also, can I do this without
getting zapped ? I am asking because I just de-
stroyed a CRT by accidentally knocking against
just that socket and it would be a great help
to not have it in the way.
Any help will be appreciated.

Thomas

COLLET@SCRIPPS.EDU
From: howarth@rice.edu (Jack W. Howarth)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: cheapest source of high vol. DW cartridges
Date: 16 Aug 1992 21:10:26 GMT


  Does anyone know of a very good mail order price for the new
DeskWriter cartridges (Black) that have double the ink capacity?
The best local price I have seen is $25.99. I was hoping to do
much better than that through a mail-order place. Thanks.
            Jack

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack W. Howarth, Ph.D.                      Univ. of Texas Medical School
Research Fellow                                            P.O. Box 20708 
Department of Biochemistry                           Houston, Texas 77225      
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
howarth@proto.med.uth.tmc.edu    Phone: 713-792-5667    FAX: 713-794-4150
From: jtgorman@cs.arizona.edu (J. Taggart Gorman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: SUPER FAST/CHEAP PCMIA (?) cards?
Date: 22 Aug 92 22:40:56 GMT
Reply-To: jtgorman@cs.arizona.edu (J. Taggart Gorman)
Organization: Organization?  We don't need no steenking organization!
Discliamer: Upon my being captured or killed, my professors will
            disavow any knowledge of me, my statements, and/or
            my mission.


In article <1992Aug22.015518.10946@midway.uchicago.edu>,
Citizen ttak@midway.uchicago.edu writes :
[talking about PCMIA cards]
>OK, I've been reading short clips about this new storage technology
>in MacWeek.  What I know is that it might be $20 per card, which,
>I think can hold about a gig?  And it will be fast enough to act
>as RAM, as well as disk storage.  Is this true?  When will it be out?
>About how much would the special drive for this be?

  Uh, I remember reading some stuff on these cards in MacLeak and I'm pretty
sure that the price would be $20 per megabyte, ie a 20meg card would run about
$400.  I also don't remeber reading about storage anywhere near a gig.  Maybe
I'm thinking of the wrong thing.  Anyone else care to take a side?

  If they were $20 a card, yes the world would be changing, but at $20 a meg,
prices need to drop seriously before these things revolutionize the world of
memory.

|--------------------------------|    "If you were happy all of your life,
|      J. Taggart Gorman Jr.     |     you wouldn't be human - you'd be a
| jtgorman@caslon.cs.arizona.edu |     game show host."
|--------------------------------|             Winona Ryder, in _Heathers_
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: danm@watson.ibm.com (Dan McCabe)
Subject: Re: 2.5" Hard drives
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 20:23:12 GMT
Reply-To: danm@grumpy.watson.ibm.com (Dan McCabe)
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM TJ Watson Research


In article <1992Aug13.185438.16117@bcrka451.bnr.ca>, stu5s11@bcrka280.bn
writes:
|> Now If they can only figure out how to add a 19"
|> color screen to my power book so I can use it on the road.
|>
|> John Andrusiak

If you don't mind the fold that they put into the screen to fit into
an 8.5"x11" form factor, it should be no problem.

Cheers,
danm