From: 01sybok@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Subject: Re: Pained Whale?
Date: 15 Oct 92 09:31:29 -0300
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

banta (oh look, he can breathe and type at the same time!) writes:
> 01sybok, imitating Jefferson Darcy, writes:
>>> saying you were unoriginal, shallow, and had misguided spite, but I
>>                              ^^^^^^^
> 
>>1 outta 3 ain't bad, and as I recall you *did* give me credit for 
> 
> Perceiving one out of three of your deficiencies probably indicates
> why you have tha dopey, self-satisfied grin on your face.  You
> shouldn't.  You just need to work harder.

What I *MEANT* was that while making three wild stabs at my character,
somehow you actually managed to hit on one of my weaknesses. I was quite amazed
you could manage a "hit to miss' ratio that high, considering your clear
inability to judge character (and lack of braincells).
And the facial expression is called a smirk. I am smirking because once
again I have managed to yank your chain, and am now enjoying the subsequent 
howl.


> 
> They aren't really equivalent.  Sort of like Mikey and rational
> human being aren't equivalent.  Or like saying snake navels and "in
> the dirt" are equivalent.  Are you a snake navel, Mikey?

Nope. But I am rational... when I feel like it.

> 
>>Rule Number One of Life, Banta: Beautiful People are never wrong. 
> 
> This might be applicable if you were beautiful, here in this
> newsgroup, Mikey.  You see, physical beauty doesn't apply, here.
> Based on your writings, I've just quietly wrinkled my nose at your
> material, much like a prim, high-society marm wrinkles her nose at
> dust on the doorsills or mildew behind the toilet.  I don't know
> why.  But I've decided I've been polite long enough.
> 

Ahh... do you often stick your head behind toilets Banta? I expect that's how 
you met most of your friends, is it? Admittedly, it wouldn't surprise me, 
just as your characterization of yourself as a marm
dosen't surprise me. I always suspected you were a tight assed anal 
retentive inflexible fool. I guess now I have confirmation.


> If your writing is any indication of of beauty, you're ugly.  You're
> so ugly a slug wouldn't crawl across your face.  Cats didn't even try
> to bury you in the sandbox because you smelled so bad. Maggots
> wouldn't even feed on you.  If you went swimming in a sludge tank,
> the sewage workers would get sick.  Yeah, you're that ugly.


On the other hand, if writings are indications of one's physical appearance,
what does your passage say about your appearance, when you are capable of
creating imagry like that? Tell me Banta, do you look in your family album
for such inspiration?



> that wasn't an apology I slipped in your mouth.

Sorry Banta, you don't have that much money. America dosen't have *that* 
much money.


> Yeah.  I wouldn't hire anyone for Dalhousie (or whatever), regardless
> of GPA.  Your school's reputation precedes you.

That would be the "in the top ten" reputation, I guess.


>>Plus I already have my degree. DO try to stay current.
> 
> Nice placemat, eh?

Actually, it micely covers a small hole in the wall.


>  Placard:  "Will work for food"
>  Response: "Blow me!"

Been that long, has it Banta?

Mike