HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: 88p8337@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au (Antartica Archer(tm))
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6.4, green card, freedom, money, et al.
Date: 14 Apr 92 12:36:05 +1000
Organization: FLAME FRONT(tm)

In article <29E94FEC.11309@noiro.acs.uci.edu>, yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes: 
> In article <1992Apr12.151254.1770@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au>, 88p8337@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au (Antartica Archer(tm)) wrote:
                     
> +  What's wrong for some people try to stay at some certain place of this
> +space ship ? What ever reason it appear is, the essential reason is that
> +China (in some extend, Asia) is too much over populated and the rest of 
> +this planet has the responsibility to share this burden. Furthermore, those
> +burden of China/Asia may become treasure for other parts of this world.  
> 
> 	Nothing wrong with people's moving around.  But, they should seek
> 	normal avenues to do this.  To move to the US thru putting their
> 	own government for sale is an non-ethical approach.
> 
  How normal is "normal"? It is approached legally, isn't it "normal"
enough? 
  According to your "logic", opposition in all countries are "non-ethical"
because they all "put their own government for sale" in order to "buy"
voter.



> +> 5. These "6.4 green cards" shall be called as "red cards" becasue they
> +>    reflect 6.4. victims' blood.
> +
> +  I guess you're drunk, goddamn illogical. If those people did not apply
> +for green card, would 6.4 victims regain their lives ? 
> 
> 	We are talking about the 6.4 "green cards", not normal ones.

   Again, why these green card are so abnormal ?



> +> 
> +> 10. I myself came to the US before 6.4.  But don't forget my voice on 6.5 of
> +>     1989.  "Don't cry for your Chinese coffins be4 the White House".
> +> 
> + 
> +  What I see is some people scare to dead as seeing more and more people
> +had got their green cards because they themself lose more and more
> +oppotunities and face more and more competitors. Earlier migrant
> +having hatred toward new migrant is very common, for human being or other
> +animals.
> 
> 	I myself is not an immigrant, and I have NOT seen anything as
> 	you described as yet.  

   Really? you're either living in god's Eden Garden or blind. Anyway, 
it is your luck not to seen that. 

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: wangf@unixg.ubc.ca (Frank Wang)
Subject: Re: Qing1 Ming2 Festival
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 18:54:13 GMT

In article   writes:
>vis!ucbvax!cs.bju.cn!s04031
>Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
>Subject: Qing1 Ming2 Festival
>Message-ID: <1992Apr5.172618.328@vaxsar.vassar.edu>
>From: s04031@cs.bju.cn
>Date: 5 Apr 92 17:26:18 +1000
>Lines: 14
>
> Aah, it's that time of the year again:
> 
>     Qing1 Ming2 Shi2 Jie2 Yu3 Fen1 Fen1,
>     Lu4 Shang4 Xing2 Ren2 Yu4 Duan4 Hun2.
>     (During the Qingming festival, the weather is always rainy.
>      This together with remembrance of
>Message-ID: <9204040603.AA20404@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
>Date: 4 Apr 92 06:03:45 GMT
>Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
>Lines: 3
>
>
> DON'T FORGET THOSE DIED ON JUNE 4TH OF 1989!
> 

When is Qing Ming.  What calender do we follow, Sun or Moon?
What date was meant in that Tang poem?

F.Wang
From: chx@dblab.is.tsukuba.ac.jp (Chen Han Xiong)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Olympic games in Beijing
Date: 9 Apr 92 06:37:53 GMT
Organization: Inst. of Info. Sci. & Elec., Univ. of Tsukuba, Tsukuba City,
	Ibaraki, Japan

In article <1992Apr4.182657.11528@cco.caltech.edu> lzh@cco.caltech.edu (Zhaohong Li) writes:

 >>	   I haven't seen much discussion of this issue on the net.
 >>  I am sure there are many knowledgeble overseas Chinese on this
 >>  issue. I would like to see their opinions on the various aspects
 >>  of hosting the Olympic Games in Beijing in year 2000.

A Beijing government spokesman said several days ago that China will
cost 1b$ but earn 1.1b$ for the Games. (see People's Daily). 
I personally object to the plan of hosting the Games, remebering 
the Beijing Asian Games and the donation campaign.
--
                                            
  ::	Hanxiong Chen 
  ::    Email: chx@dblab.is.tsukuba.ac.jp
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Q: foreigners bringing radios to PRC
From: yding@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Yijun Ding)
Date: 10 Apr 92 13:27:11 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
Keywords: RADIO

In article <1992Apr10.062515.14929@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> hyx1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Harry Y Xu) writes:
>>a) shortwave radios
>>b) VHF-LO, VHF, UHF scanning radio
>
>	c) transmitters, tranceivers.?
>	d) handhelds (like walkie-talkie). ?
>
>	Me too.  Me too.   Hey, how about post it.

There were discussions about a month ago. You should not have problems to
bring any of these.

-- 
/* Yijun Ding, Pittsburgh PA.  412-624-0134
/* open your window and get something fresh */
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu (Michael L. Le Houllier)
Subject: Re: Tibet ...
Reply-To: m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu (Michael L. Le Houllier)
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, N.H.
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 14:26:49 GMT

In article <zzuo.702246546@pv7429.vincent.iastate.edu> zzuo@iastate.edu (Zhiqi Zuo) writes:
>
>  Thank you , Scott .
>
>*** By Deng Xiao Ping , in the position of Chinese people .
>
>
>  By the way , why are some foreigners so eager to raise the racial
>problems in China ?  There are 56 races in China .  When there are 
                                ^^^^^^^^^
>no discriminations to the minorities in China , why do they distinguish Han
>from other races , with amazing enthusiasim ?

I hope you mean 56 ethnicities.  Please clear this up.

>


-- 
 Michael Le Houllier           *  John 3:16  * Nov 12, 1991 - Dili      
 (m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu.us) *  Remember: June 4, 1989 - Beijing
 Go BLUE JAYS   1-0   at Tigers Monday (4-2), Wednesday and Thursday
 End the strike.  Get back on the ice.  Get the playoffs going.
From: xu@CS.UCDAVIS.EDU (Hao Xu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6/4, green card, etc.
Date: 15 Apr 92 21:38:06 GMT


In article <29EBC34A.9020@noiro.acs.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
>"  _____\_____    |----------|  "     /_ ===|        |----
>     /     \      | _|    |__|        /_------   ----|-----
>    /       \     |__________|       __/ \ | /       |  \
> 					 / |\__      |   \
>[histerical yelling deleted]

Is it true that the more aloud you say, the more correct you are?
Is it true that the bigger you write, the more correct you are?

Shannon, what will you say about claiming it was students caused the
killing? Certainly you think it is much better than 6/4 green card,
don't you?

One who asserts it was students caused the killing is NOT entitled
to talk about anything related to 6/4. Shut up, CCP ass-kissing
apologists and fact-distorting liars!

Hao
From: ph279sw@prism.gatech.EDU (FR SIGING WEI)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6.4, green card, freedom, money, et al.
Date: 12 Apr 92 17:30:48 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

Before you people jump onto this subject, please calm down and 
see if my statements make sense.

First, my observation is: (some) people are too narrow
minded, please allow the other people FGNC, if else
find a way to work for their own benifit, let them.
We are only human, NOT GOD, we do work for ourself
(so do you), that's how we survive.

Second, my understanding: if someone claim something is
all good/bad with no exception, I tend to believe that
this someone is either 1. lying for some reason, or
2. really stupid.

So... 
if you want to say the Chinese Government is good,
you might have a point on the good things they do; but
if you claim that there is nothing wrong.... let me
quote what the Communist Party's own statement,
"the greatness of our party lies with its ability to correct
its own mistake", at least they are not as hot about 
themself as some netters are.

So be fair to the rest, please.

Wei
From: xu@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu (Hao Xu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse (Re: 6.4, green card, freedom...)
Date: 14 Apr 92 00:27:13 GMT
Article-I.D.: ucdavis.12208
Reply-To: xu@toadflax.UUCP (Hao Xu)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis

In article <1992Apr13.194225.591@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> srzhang@mth.msu.edu (Shuren Zhang) writes:
>
>                **** WITNESS *****
>
>Before 1989 TAM, Shannon went back to Beijing and had a fight against
>CCP leaders at various levels.  Those leaders rendered personal
>persecution to him.  

And he told us he had freedom of speech in China. What a disgrace liar
and backboneless ...

Hao
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: kyee@bnlux1.bnl.gov (kenton yee)
Subject: How to apply for welfare in US
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 06:11:57 GMT

  I have a friend from China on a student visa who is graduating
 with a PhD this June.  Since he is unable to find a job, he will
be unemployed.  He has no relatives in this country.  Does anyone
 know if he is eligible for welfare and other social programs?  


Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu (Michael L. Le Houllier)
Subject: Re: Tibet and barbaric culture
Reply-To: m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu (Michael L. Le Houllier)
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, N.H.
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 14:36:02 GMT

In article <1992Apr3.143133.2241@ducvax.auburn.edu> ding@eng.auburn.edu (Z. Ding) writes:
>
>It's really a challenge to find a single country or nation that
>never used force (not ``barbarious'')!

Canada?

-- 
 Michael Le Houllier           *  John 3:16  * Nov 12, 1991 - Dili      
 (m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu.us) *  Remember: June 4, 1989 - Beijing
 Go BLUE JAYS   1-0   at Tigers Monday (4-2), Wednesday and Thursday
 End the strike.  Get back on the ice.  Get the playoffs going.
From: yding@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Yijun Ding)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: SCC Unsolved Mystery.
Date: 13 Apr 92 18:32:30 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Apr13.103223.3104@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
>
>History is made of human names. Name is the most important thing
>in any subject. People associate scientific laws, theorems with

Sometime, people remember the names of the law but not the law itself ;-)

>names. Evil is also associated with names. In the Cultural Revolution,
>names are neglected.

In CR, names are neglected? What that means? No wonder some of SCCers like
to post names.

>
>We judge these politicians not only by their politics, but personal 
>character as well. These include his personal life, his family and

Hmmm, to know a person's character you need to know his/her family...

-- 
/* Yijun Ding, Pittsburgh PA.  412-624-0134
/* open your window and get something fresh */
From: echeng@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu (Eddie Cheng)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Flood Donation
Date: 14 Apr 92 14:26:44 GMT
Reply-To: echeng@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu (Eddie Cheng)
Organization: Ohio State University: Physics Department

In article <1992Apr14.045607.9672@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> xiong@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Bo Xiong) writes:
>
|If you follow SCC, you should see that the BJ LZ An Mong claimed that
|IFCSS would send money back in ONE MONTH, and you must have seen Eddie's
|posting on the subject today, and SCC hasn't seen the story from the
|other side, but according to Eddie's message, the BJ LZ An Mong's
|political masturbation show went nowhere and he didn't mention "donation
|money" until later in that show (he FK-ed IFCSS on MFN, then claimed to
|sue IFCSS for mail fraud, and then donation money), you should see how
|honest BOTH sides are ... :-)


	WAIT A MINUTE, I think you put too much stuff after "according to
Eddie's message" !!!   :-(

	I hope "my message" would survive.  --- aka Tsongas.    :-)


    Eddie
From: fengzou@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Feng Zou)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Looking for classmate:Yuan-yang Chen and Yu-hong Song
Date: 9 Apr 1992 18:14:12 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

   I am looking for my classsmates Yuan-yang Chen and Yu-hong Song
. Both of them were MS students from Dong-Bei-Gong-Xue-Yan in Shenyang.
They came here in US about six months or a year. IF you guys happen to
know any of them, please e-mail me.

Thank you!

Feng ZOU
From: xu@CS.UCDAVIS.EDU (Hao Xu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6.4 red card is ...
Date: 15 Apr 92 20:39:28 GMT

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse (Re: 6.4, green card, freedom...)
Summary: 
Expires: 
Reply-To: xu@toadflax.UUCP (Hao Xu)
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis
Keywords: 

In article <29EBB3B5.7661@noiro.acs.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
>xu@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu (Hao Xu) wrote:
>
>+The "specch" in "freedom of speech" is not limited to verbal speech.
>+Anything that expresses a view counts, e.g. burning the flag, refuese
>+to attend the "political study", or strike. Well, let's not talk in
>+the dark. Why not tell what Shannon did then, if Shannon permits?
>+At least we can make a better judgement.
>
>first, although i have the "freedom of speech" to say Cao\(fuck) Ni\/(your)
>Ma\(mother), but, if i exercise this "freedom of speech", you will be
>angry.

It is hopeless to explain to Shannon that personal attack doesn't count
"expressing a view" except to say "Fuck every female in your family,
Shannon".

>Similarly, freedom does not mean you can do whatever you like.
>For example, if you drive too fast on the "free"way, you will ticketed.
>Furthermore, even in the US, flag burning is not a good thing.

You violated People Daily's copy-right.

>/ /---/     __\__  __\__       ---|---          |-----|
>|   |         |      |        -----/---         |     |        ?
>|  /|\      / |\   / | \          /|====\       /     |___\

I am your "lao3 ba4", because I Cao-ed Ni Ma.

Hao
From: byang@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu (Bin Yang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: News SCC is for news, not a battlefield!
Date: 15 Apr 92 21:09:20 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.175101.15609@cs.yale.edu>, horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes:
> In article <9204151655.AA07054@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>, PXW10@PSUVM.PSU.EDU writes:
> <
> <You never know if your argument is stupid.
> 
> On the contrary, I always know that my arguments are not stupid.
> 
Oh yah! Like those 100 repeated lines! Of course YOU would not think it was 
stupid, or you would not have done it.
From: xu@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu (Hao Xu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Chinese Nationals Came Before 4/1/90
Keywords: No
Date: 11 Apr 92 23:51:31 GMT
Reply-To: xu@toadflax.UUCP (Hao Xu)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis

In article <3531@disuns2.epfl.ch> news@disuns2.epfl.ch (News manager) writes:
>
>>*Does the Congress pass laws prohibitting CSSs from going back to China?
>
>Since CSSs don't want to go back, "a protection law" = "a prohibition law".
>Neat, isn't it?

Absolutely wrong. A protection law is an extention of right while a
prohibition law is a restriction of right. Furthermore, not every CSS
want to stay here forever, a friend of mine is planning to go back.
So you used wrong assumption and a wrong equation, no wonder you get the
wrong conclution. Sorry, exam not passed :-))

>Except those political elites. Since Deng wants economic reform,
>not political one.

What happens if CSS want both?
 
>KF-HUA

Hao
From: iad@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Ivan A Derzhanski)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Don't be misled!!!
Date: 14 Apr 92 18:33:19 GMT
Organization: Centre for Cognitive Science, Edinburgh, UK

In article <1992Apr13.111233.6215@bsu-ucs.uucp> 00rdharringt@bsu-ucs.uucp writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.042005.4415@cs.yale.edu>, horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes:
>>
>> I'll need to be convinced that the PRC government is Communist.  (It's
>> definitely not communist [note the lower-case `c'].)
>
>I agree there... I feel a lot of the "Communist" nations aren't so much
>Communist as they are Marxist...

And what makes you think that they are Marxist?

By the way, what _is_ a "Marxist nation" in the first place?  I would
call a nation Marxist if a high percentage of the population follows a
certain ideology called Marxism (as I would call it Buddhist if a high
percentage of the population follows a certain religion called
Buddhism).  Now what is a way to know which are the more Marxist and
the less Marxist nations in the world?

>> <If you want to glorify communism, why don't you
>> <go live in it?  All but four have already fallen however.
>> 
>> All but four what?
>
>Communist nations... Cuba, PRC, DPRK, and VietNam...

These are countries (or states), not nations. - Exactly how much has
each one of them to do with communism?  My answer wrt all four is
"very little, if anything at all".

>|  "It is good fortunes for politicians that people don't think."- A. Hitler

Adolf was damned right about that.  Sometimes I get the feeling that
people deliberately avoid thinking only in order to make their
politicians (who are people too) happy.
-- 
---- --- -- -  Long Live the Rose and the Heather!  - -- --- ----
Ivan A Derzhanski   (iad@cogsci.ed.ac.uk;  iad@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu)
* Centre for Cognitive Science,  2 Buccleuch Place,  Edinburgh EH8 9LW,  UK
* Cowan House, Pollock Halls, 18 Holyrood Park Road, Edinburgh EH16 5BD, UK
From: U17375@uicvm.uic.edu (Ed Zawacki [Postmaster])
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Foreigner living in Chinese homes
Date: 14 Apr 92 15:14:23 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago

I am going to China in May-June with my mother-in-law to visit her father
(my wife's grandfather). We are planning on staying in their home while
we are there (in Harbin).

My mother-in-law is from Taiwan and I am caucasian. I just heard yesterday
that that for me (in particular) to live in their home could cause them a
problem with the police. Is this true? Even though we are related in some
way?

Thanks
Ed Zawacki
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: kniaz@cat4.cs.wisc.edu (Joel Kniaz)
Subject: AHEM!!! A little clarification, if I may...
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison -- Computer Sciences Dept.
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 00:15:43 GMT

In article <13APR199222315025@vxcrna.cern.ch> yang@vsoph8.cern.ch writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.180829.16848@daffy.cs.wisc.edu>, 
>kniaz@rt2.cs.wisc.edu (Joel Kniaz) writes...
>
>>	this may be true to some extent (my SO would certainly benefit
>                                         ^^^^^^^^
>>	from this legislation), ...
>>					--Joel
>> 
>  I think this has something to do with "culture", so I post:

	I think this has more to do with "misunderstanding."

>  Any decent Chinese woman will fell greatly insulted if she has been refered
>  to as "Sex Object (SO)".(if Bao Xiong@Chicago's explanation of SO as "Sex
>  Object" is correct)

	I will assume that this is a joke, but, for any netters reading
	this who may be as ignorant of idiomatic English as Mr. Xiong, 
	I will clarify the issue.   "SO" stands for "Significant Other".
	That is a more comfortable way of saying that two people are 
	involved without using more loaded terminology such as `wife' 
	(we're not married), `girlfriend' (she's a woman, not a `girl'), 
	or `Sex Object' (ahem!).  In short, it is a polite yet ambiguous 
	way to introduce one's `better half' to people for whom the 
	specifics of the relationship are none of their business 
	( hint, hint ).

							Exasperatedly,
								Joel Kniaz
	P.s. Wallet-sized photos available
		in gif format upon request 
					:>
     ______________________________________________________________________
    / "Lo, Though I walk through the valley in the shadow of death,       /
    \    I fear not!                                        ______________\
    /  For I am the biggest son-of-a-bitch in the valley." / My favorite  /
    \______________________________________________________\ expression...\
    / Joel Kniaz   kniaz@garfield.cs.wisc.edu  kniaz@jomby /      __i     /
    \______________________________________________________\_yiLballe(Mu)_\
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: jzhang@sdcc3.UCSD.EDU
Subject: Impression of Prof. Fang Lizhi's Talk at UCSD
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 09:43:22 PDT

Professor Fang Lizhi gave a lecture at UCSD to general audience on
Monday evening (April 6) and talked with Chinese students and scholars 
later. The presentation was centered on science and politics in China, 
and he spent considerable time on how he was unfairly treated by the 
Chinese government. Fang himself summarized the situation as: "the Chinese 
authorities like science, but not scientists", because those trained 
in science would cultivate a spirit for freedom.   

As a USTC graduate, I have listened to Fang's talks back in China,
and met him again in New Jersey in 1986. His opinions sometimes strike
me as quite simplistic. For example, the problems in China are
presented as if simply because of conflicts between good guys
(scientists/democracy fighters) and bad guys (emperors/CCP officials).
To explain why the education budget/GNP level in China is low, Fang
says that it is because CCP "wants to control people's mind". And CCP
"wants to isolate China" from outside world, that is why communication
between China and the outside is difficult. He cited an example,
that to send an international fax from China costs about 40 Yuan per
page (about $8), which is about a professor's weekly salary.  

Fang Lizhi also answered some questions after his talk. I asked him
about what he thinks are Chinese people's opinions about lobbying
U.S. Congress to put conditions on MFN. He said that quite a few
democracy fighters in China wrote to him and expressed that "MFN 
must be conditioned"; and his own release from the U.S. embassy in
Beijing was due to the pressure on MFN. However, he did not mention 
any opinions in China which are different from his. 

About two months ago, Yan Jiaqi also came to UCSD and gave a talk.
I had a chance to chat with him. He gave me an impression of being
more modest and open to different opinions. 

Zhenqin Li
jzhang@sdcc3.ucsd.edu
From: xu@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu (Hao Xu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Black card ( RE: green card )
Keywords: No
Date: 11 Apr 92 23:48:14 GMT
Reply-To: xu@toadflax.UUCP (Hao Xu)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis

In article <zzuo.703027422@pv7428.vincent.iastate.edu> zzuo@iastate.edu (Zhiqi Zuo) writes:
>
>> >We come here not for democracy , but for money ( or opportuinties , whatever
>                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I was giving the most important reason .
>Money is the basis of daily life for a average person , isn't it ? (In 
>Addition to spritual things .)  

Compare to China's population, CSS is really a tiny portion. And average
CSS educational level is far above average education level in China. By no
means they are average. Spritual life consists of a major part of Chinese
intellectuals. You can't ignore it and just talk about material life.

Hao
From: horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: cease fire
Date: 16 Apr 92 13:39:43 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.1992Apr16.133943.25842
Organization: Computer "Science" Dept, Yale University

In article <92106.011618SXS30@psuvm.psu.edu> SXS30@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>
>        HOW ABOUT DISCUSS SOME FOLK'S SONGS?

OK, why not?  I'll start:

	Zhang1 Lao3 San1, wo3 wen4 ni3, ni3 di jia1xiang1 zai4 na3li3?

					--Scott

-- 
Scott Horne                               ...!{harvard,cmcl2,decvax}!yale!horne
horne@cs.Yale.edu      SnailMail:  Box 7196 Yale Station, New Haven, CT   06520
203 436-1848                Residence:  Rm 1848 Silliman College, New Haven, CT
Shao2shan1 sheng1 de tai4yang2 yong3 bu2 luo4!
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china