From: dallagata@fnala.fnal.gov (Michele Dall'Agata)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Poor Michele, stuck in the Middle Ages...
Date: 15 Dec 92 12:54:19 -0600
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <1992Dec14.002810.29593@Princeton.EDU>, datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
> In article <1992Dec13.151403.1@fnala.fnal.gov>, dallagata@fnal.fnal.com
> (Michele Dall'Agata) writes:
> 
> <much homophobic garbage deleted>
> 
> Now this is rich. The same person (I use the term loosely) who professes
> to be concerned for women and minorities shows his true colors. Are you
> so insecure with your sexual identity that you must constantly invent
> exploits with women to conceal the truth? I'm comfortable with being
> bisexual. Are you threatened by that?

I am not insecure with my sexual identity. I exploit with women because it 
is fun. Yes, I do not like gays, even if I belive that they have the rights 
to do exactly what they wanna do (without to interfere with the other 
people freedom, for sure). About gays that's my point: Ok, they are here, 
that's not natural, if there are *only* gays on this world, in one century 
there will not be humans anymore. 
> 
>>> I am so feminist that I am careful of how I behave around women--
>>> and around men, for that matter. Women don't need my help, but I don't
>>> need to hinder them, either. Got that?
> 
>>I don't need to hinder women, idiot. On the contrary, I need to
>>facilitate 
>>them. That's why, I give to them... Moi!
> 
> They're getting badly ripped off. Really, you should start off with
> candy and flowers first.

That's what you think, Idiot! One week ago I started telling to a girl (
joking obviously: hey, bring me a beer!) I've got the beer, but I did not 
want to have the girl. She is married, I did not like the idea to give 
problem to them.
> 
>>>> Yes a lot more. But why do they wear black bikini briefs? Eh, why?
>>>> Because they wanna be intellectual on the beach, maybe? People like
>>>> to have fun, also. Idiot.
>>> 
>>> I was talking about *you* and your stained underpants. Idiot.
> 
>>Anyway you did not answer to my question. Why?
> 
> Because your question was irrelevant. Because you showed you had not
> fully comprehended my post. And because if I gave you the answer, the
> rotting melon you call a brain would heat up and explode with the
> effort of trying to comprehend it all.
> 
> Tep--hate is not a family value.
> -- 
> Did you really think I spoke for anyone else? Boy, you're gullible!

You know, Tep. I do not like the people like you. You think to have the 
Truth of the Universe, you think that your way to behave is the *only* 
right way, and if somebody behave in a different way, he is wrong for you.
I did not say that you were wrong. I tried to explain you that there are 
many ways to deal with girls, no matter what you do, if *they* like what you 
do. I tried to explain you that there are cute, lovely girls, and hot (not 
necessarily bitchies) flaming girls. Somebody like to be cute and quite, 
somebody else like to have an exciting life. I did not judge you, you DID 
judge me. That's bad, man. You are not a judge. And take care. I know how 
to behave on your way, you don't know how to behave on my way. And I know, 
also, that people like you lost their girls because they found a guy that 
was able to give them something exciting that they needed to have sometime. 
And that's dangerous. For you more than for me.

	Michele