From: decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz)
Subject: Re: Garvin's attempts to tell only half the story
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 14:12:44 GMT
Followup-To: talk.abortion

In article <nyikos.725159376@milo.math.scarolina.edu>, nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
> In <1992Dec23.132558.25246@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
> 
> >In article <1992Dec23.013921.7465@ncsu.edu>, dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
> 
> I have added alt.flame to the newsgroups.
> 
> >> In article <1992Dec21.003426.21330@rotag.mi.org> 
> >> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
> >> 
> >> > Gee, seems Susie is perfectly willing to forgive someone who jokes, in 
> >> > alt.sex, about mass rape and doesn't apologize for it. I wonder if she would 
> >> > be as forgiving of someone who joked about something equally tasteless in 
> >> > alt.flame and DID apologize for making a mistake?
> >> 
> >> But that would require consistency from Garvin.
> >> 
> 
> Why am I NOT surprised to see Kaflowitz jump in to
> deflect well-deserved flames [thank you, Chris Lyman, for teaching
> me that phrase] away from Susan Garvin?
> 
> Does Susan Garvin ever return these big favors Kaflowitz does for her
> and the rest of the talk.abortion inner circle of women?
> 
> >What this little discussion is about is the time Kevin Darcy
> >accused the victim of child molestation of being a child
> >molester, then he spent weeks trying to support his remarks,
> >then finally apologized for it and claimed it was all a joke.
> >Now The Reverend Douglas Holtsinger seems to find it
> >inconsistent of Susan to be unforgiving of someone who
> >called her SO a child molester.
> 
> Let's see...is Kaflowitz talking about one person (Darcy) or two
> here?  I can't figure it out from what he is saying, and unlike
> him, I am not clairvoyant. :-)

One needs only a modicum of intelligence to figure it out,
"Doctor."  That explains your difficulties in comprehension.

I notice that you have nothing to say on the actual issue,
but just a pathetic attempt to act as though my words produced
your stupidity.  I can take no credit for your stupidity,
"Doctor."

> >I think the Reverend Doug is something of an idiot, and I
> >feel secure in my expectations of consistency on that score.
> 
> Kaflowitz is also quite consistent in his behavior.  I think
> I'll leave him alone for a while, for that reason.  Parting shots:
> 
> (1) Could someone inform me when Kaflowitz posts documentation in a 
> post when he deflects flames from Garvin, Regard and the rest
> of the inner circle which he seems desirous of gaining entry into?

One of the funnier stupidites from the "Doctor."  Aside from the
awkward wording and dangling preposition (if you want to post
spelling flames for Mark Cochran because he typed "yoru" instead
of "your," you should have someone who has a real degree proof
your work), the "Doctor" seems to think I need to repost
articles that aren't questioned at all by those who were
involved.  Darcy certainly doesn't dispute that he made
the accusation, he just claims now that it was a joke.  He
did spend several weeks trying to justify his accusation
before he apologized, and it wasn't until much later that he
claimed it was a joke.  The articles were posted and reposted
numerous times in this forum.  I see no need to repost them
simply because the "Doctor" never saw them or is unable to
remember them.

> (2) Dean, did you ever find out how much you have to kowtow to Garvin
> and Regard to gain entry?  Or did they rebuff you with words like:
> "What do men know about abortion, anyway?"

Ah, you poor pathetic dim little crustacean, there is no "inner
circle," neither Susan nor Adrienne ever say what you attribute to
them here, although they do point out that some knowledge about
abortion is denied men because we can't have abortions, and I've never
been much of a joiner anyway.

Dean Kaflowitz