HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kencham@centi.cs.umn.edu (Deepak Kenchammana-Hosekote)
Subject: Re: Calendars and Brains
Keywords: generalizations
Organization: University of Minnesota
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 20:16:40 GMT

In <92Nov16.194218.19324@acs.ucalgary.ca> panlilio@acs.ucalgary.ca (Victor P. Panlilio) writes:

>Victor 8^)
>(who just got asked by one of his models if he's interested in
>moving in with her -- on a strictly platonic basis, of course)

VICTOR !!!!!

Folks, don't you feel Victor is tempting guys like me to use all our resources
to track Victor and ......... ;-)

\the puck
--
A Kenchammana-Hosekotan yesterday, today and tomorrow.
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: osickey@dryer.ecn.purdue.edu (Matt J. Osickey)
Subject: Re: READ THIS JENNY
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Distribution: na
Date: 20 Nov 92 18:04:28 GMT

<LXP111@psuvm.psu.edu> (Long Phamdo) writes:

>>Victor
>>(who has access to quite a few handy Net resources)

>=====-----da Long-Man---------->  Bye Bye

    I'm not completely sure how this was started (and if you
    feel inclined to tell me, do it e-mail), but I'd much
    rather discover a newsgroup filled with posts about
    Roseanne Barf (much less supermodels) than find one filled
    with the juvenile rantings of a pair of bottle-fed, emotionally
    starved adolescents.  It is hard to say which one is worse, but
    at least Schlong exhibits a glimmer of sense of humor.

                                 azrael

Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: david@donald.concordia.ca (David Gaudine)
Subject: Re: tcable3.jpg (part1/2)
Organization:  ORGANIZATION!! HERE? You must be kidding
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 22:09:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.105634.1@brandonu.ca> brycerw@brandonu.ca writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.182420.13248@mtu.edu>, ksjohnso@mathlab.mtu.edu(KRIS A. JOHNSON) writes:
>> In article <1992Nov18.172611.101@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>  
>> c5ff@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (COOK  Charlie) writes:
>>> I heard someone mention Tawnni Cable's name and I happened
>>> to have a jpg of her.  I may be able to dig up a couple more,
>>> if people think she belongs on this newsgroup.
>> 
>> After viewing Tawnni's jpeg, I'd have to say that, yes, she could  
>> definatley be placed among the lofty ranks of the supernmodels.  More of  
>> the same would be appreciated.
>
>Yes. Yes. Post ALL you can of her.

Gee, I seem to be in the minority here.  I say she belongs only in
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica, since to the best of my knowledge she
is known for nothing except her gif files.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Gaudine, Concordia University, Montreal.  david@donald.concordia.ca
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels,soc.women,alt.feminism,soc.men
From: riaedwards@halls1.cc.monash.edu.au (AUDREY EDWARDS)
Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson causes rape?
Organization: Halls of Residence, Monash University 
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 06:43:50 GMT

In article <johnr.721842082@ee.uts.EDU.AU> johnr@ee.uts.edu.au (John Reekie) writes:
>From: johnr@ee.uts.edu.au (John Reekie)
>Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson causes rape?
>Date: 15 Nov 92 15:41:22 GMT

>riaedwards@halls1.cc.monash.edu.au (AUDREY EDWARDS) writes:

>>In article <johnr.721585353@ee.uts.EDU.AU> johnr@ee.uts.edu.au (John Reekie) writes:
>>>From: johnr@ee.uts.edu.au (John Reekie)
>>>Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson causes rape?
>>>Date: 12 Nov 92 16:22:33 GMT

>>>riaedwards@halls1.cc.monash.edu.au (AUDREY EDWARDS) writes:

>>>>One things for certain, whilst I'm as confident as I want to be, I 
>>>>certainly would not date a man with an Elle MacPherson calandar on his 
>>>>wall! Now, a Paul Klee calandar is different (and for the culturally 
>>>>unenlightened, he is not a member of the Chippendales!!!!)   

>>>I do not have an Elle PacPherson calendar on my wall. I would
>>>like to, but I do not, because it would upset my girlfriend. Does that make
>>>me a Dateable Man or a Nondateable Man?

>>If you have a girlfriend, then definately undateable!!!!!!!

>I am curious to know why you would attach such importance to the
>presence of an Elle calendar on a man's wall that you
>would decide not to date him on that fact alone. Is this such
>a telling indicator about every other aspect of his personality?


>I think not...

You ask a very interesting question, and after pondering it for a while, I 
am forced to the conclusion that I would attach importance to it, and it 
would be a strong factor. It's justifying why, that's harder. As with all 
matter relating to attraction, logic or justice doesn't play a part (for 
example, whilst I try not to be racist in other aspects of my existance, I 
am not attracted to Chinese men). 

As I have mentioned previously, all of the "girly" calandars I have seen 
are, to my eyes, aesthetically of poor quality. Thus, as someone who regards 
such things as important, it would be a factor in my analysis, insofar as 
it indicated the tastes of the person who displayed it. 

Audrey. 
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: corsa@shell.portal.com (Eric Richard Elliott)
Subject: Re: ellie gifs
Organization: Portal Communications Company
Distribution: alt.supermodels
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 19:11:27 GMT

allorja@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jason M. Allor) writes:

>I really, really love Ellie.  Unfortunately, I just got onto this newsgroup.
>Could someone either post a lot of Ellie gifs or mail some to me??  That
>would be great.  Thanks.

>Ellie lives - brains or no.

Ellie?  Who the hell is Ellie?

Oh....I get it...Elle!  :)


                                                                   __
/-----------------------------+---------------+-------------------///-------\  
|    ___  __   ___  __   __   |               | Multitasking __  ///        |
|   |    |  | |    |__   __|  |  Unsafe at    | my life      \\\///  Amiga  |
|   |___ |__| |     __| |__|  |  any speed... | away !!!      \XX/   3000   |
|-----------------------------+---------------+-----------------------------| 
|    Eric Elliott          Corsa@shell.portal.com       GEnie: E.ELLIOTT7   |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------------/

--
 
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: ksjohnso@mathlab.mtu.edu(KRIS A. JOHNSON)
Subject: Re: tcable3.jpg (part1/2)
Organization: Michigan Technological University
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:24:20 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.172611.101@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>  
c5ff@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (COOK  Charlie) writes:
> I heard someone mention Tawnni Cable's name and I happened
> to have a jpg of her.  I may be able to dig up a couple more,
> if people think she belongs on this newsgroup.
> 
> Charlie

After viewing Tawnni's jpeg, I'd have to say that, yes, she could  
definatley be placed among the lofty ranks of the supernmodels.  More of  
the same would be appreciated.

Thanx,
KJ
Xref: sparky alt.supermodels:1979 soc.women:19874 alt.feminism:4677 soc.men:19534
From: gwangung@byron.u.washington.edu (Roger Tang)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels,soc.women,alt.feminism,soc.men
Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson causes rape?
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:39:22 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Nov18.193922.20747
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <142V03FNbcnn00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> jsp@pls.amdahl.com writes:
>gwangung@byron.u.washington.edu (Roger Tang) writes:
>
>}In article <c2Fx03hvbbTp00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> jsp@pls.amdahl.com writes:
>}>This is great.  The same people who don't like being judged based solely
>}>on their looks are now judging someone based solely on what is hanging
>}>on his wall.  Yeah, yeah, I know; what *you're* doing is difference
>}>because you're claiming to judge "personality" while those evil men
>}>are merely judging physical attributes.
>}	Big difference in my book.
>Ok, so explain this difference.

	Appearences are what a person is given; personality is what a person
does with what they're given.  Static vs. behavioral.  Reacting to what a
person IS vs. reacting to what a person DOES.

	Like I said, a big difference.

	If it ain't in your book, fine.  But your book wouldn't be something
I'd want to peruse.....

-- 
	"I got into theatre originally to pick up girls. Unfortunately, all I
found were women..."
e-mail:  gwangung@u.washington.edu
From: pimmel@eagles.cs.wisc.edu (David Pimmel)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: If She Only Had A Brain
Date: 23 Nov 92 19:37:53 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison -- Computer Sciences Dept.

In article <1992Nov23.013641.20618@zip.eecs.umich.edu> dorian@engin.umich.edu (Young W Kim) writes:
>Is this a joke? I mean really, cindy uneducated? If you call someone with a
>degree in nuclear(or aero am not sure) engineering from Berkeley uneducated,
>as cindy crawford is. Get real.
>
>

Cindy Crawford did not go to Berkeley.  She went to Northwestern.  She never
graduated, she was only there for a quarter, and then she signed a modelling
contract worth six figures a year. (who can blame her?)  While there she was
a chemical engineering major, but someone earlier said she choose this only
to get a scholarship.  Currently her younger sister is attending the school, 
studying drama, I believe.  So Cindy clearly has something between her ears
because you don't get into NU on bust size, but she has no college degree.

Abd now a new little story about Cindy.  My friends ex-girlfirend use to work
as a security monitor in the dorm where Cindy's little sister lived.  In her
opinion, Cindy's sis is also gorgeous, but I never saw her.  Anyway,  one day
a very sleazy looking woman came in to the lobby.  My friend's ex's inital 
reaction was that one of the guys in the dorm had hired a stipper or a 
prositute.  Anyway, Cindy's sis came down and they went off together.  So it
turns out that it was Cindy.  Pretty heat, huh :)


-- 

David Pimmel                    
pimmel@cs.wisc.edu
From: jsp@uts.amdahl.com (James Preston)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: Sexual harassment on the net??
Date: 19 Nov 92 18:24:38 GMT
Reply-To: jsp@pls.amdahl.com
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

LXP111@psuvm.psu.edu writes:

}Thanks James Preston even if you do think I'm slime.  

I don't think you're slime, I think you're an insensitive jerk.  And
I don't want your thanks; I wasn't defending you.

Just so that there is no mistake about this, let me state that I in
*no way* condone this person's actions.  Further, I believe strongly
that Jeniffer deserves a much more sincere apology from this person
than I have yet seen.  My only point has been that his actions do not
warrant the label "sexual harassment".

--James Preston
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: synth@deepthought.unm.edu (Synth F. Oberheim)
Subject: Re: READ THIS JENNY
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 20:58:37 GMT
Organization: SynthMedia Productions Ltd -- Now Appearing Nightly With DON HO
	<92323.214115LXP111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Distribution: na


<LXP111@psuvm.psu.edu> (Long Phamdo) writes:

Long> p.s.  Victor, by chance were genitals also removed.  This would
Long>       definitely explain your attitude towards sexual harrassment.

For November 19th, 1992, you win the award for Usenet's Biggest Idiot.

And don't worry, an acceptance speech is not required.  The honor
alone is enough.


==============================================================================
    :: :: :: :: ::     Synth F.   synth@deepthought.unm.edu    U S E N E T   
 :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  Oberheim   synth@yenta.alb.nm.us             in color!
==============================================================================
(sort of an idealized version of the complete Renaissance man)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels,soc.women,alt.feminism,soc.men
From: lib@cbnews.cb.att.com (Lib)
Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson causes rape?
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 19:40:36 GMT

In article <johnr.721842082@ee.uts.EDU.AU> johnr@ee.uts.edu.au (John Reekie) writes:
>
>I am curious to know why you would attach such importance to the
>presence of an Elle calendar on a man's wall that you
>would decide not to date him on that fact alone. Is this such
>a telling indicator about every other aspect of his personality?
>
>
>I think not...

  
You're correct, it's not a telling indicator about every aspect of his
personality but it tells you enough to know not to date him.

Newsgroups: alt.supermodels,soc.women,alt.feminism,soc.men
From: Craig.Humphrey@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Craig Andrew Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson -- Faint Praise 
Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Victoria Uni. of Wellington, New Zealand.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 10:48:48 GMT

Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: What about the _GUYS_
Summary: 
Expires: 
References:
Followup-To: 
Distribution: world
Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Victoria Uni. of Wellington, New Zealand.
Keywords: gif jpeg model men pictures

At the place where I'm temping, the guys have a _small_ collection of girly 
pictures for their PS/2 machines, to run as a backdrop under windoze.  Now the
girls who work there have their own PS/2 running windoze and want something a little different than Elle's beautiful butt on their screens.  So I've been requested to hunt around for some `boyly' or manly pics for them.

Does anyone have anything appropriate?
I'll take anything from Arnie type hulks (ie Mr Universe type) to guys that are taller lying down than standing up, if yo uget what I mean.

Thanks.

Craig.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Craig Humphrey.  chumphre@comp.vuw.ac.nz      | The above opinions in no way |
|               HUMPHREY_C@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz  | represent those of any sane, |
|Victoria University Wellington,  New Zealand. | normal person, I hope!       |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Craig Humphrey.  chumphre@comp.vuw.ac.nz      | The above opinions in no way |
|               HUMPHREY_C@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz  | represent those of any sane, |
|Victoria University Wellington,  New Zealand. | normal person, I hope!       |
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: osickey@dryer.ecn.purdue.edu (Matt J. Osickey)
Subject: Re: okay okay i'm loved!
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: 20 Nov 92 18:31:28 GMT

jennifer@netcom.com (Jennifer!) writes:


>Okay you guys!! Okay! I know you all aren't a bunch of pot-slime. :)
>More thanks and kudos to Scott, R A, Brian, Synth, Steve, Kevin,
>Mike, -wat- (I liked your suggestion, btw!), Bill, Darren and more
>kudos to my new friend Craig. Oh, and thanks for your great post,
>Victor. :) You guys are so sweet for helping to turn a horrible
>and disgusting episode into something that is now much easier to
>deal with. Thankyouthankyouthankyou.. all of you.

>-Jennifer
   Retch, gag,....

   Now that we have completed our little love-in can we
   please talk about wonderfully beautiful women and whether
   or not GIFs ought to be posted to this group.


                                    azrael
--------------------------------------------------------------------
purdue university department of chemical engineering,
where pyromaniacs play on a macroscopic scale.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
kathy ireland is god.

Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: zzekka@unislc.uucp (Zeke Zecca)
Subject: Re: Sexual harassment on the net??
Reply-To: zzekka@unislc.UUCP (Zeke Zecca,B2C10,4827)
Organization: Unisys, Salt Lake City
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:12:22 GMT

Jim buddy, give it up and get a life. Stop trying to waste others'.
Zekers!
From: wagner@weiss.cs.unc.edu (Michael Wagner)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Lynda Carter as Wonder Woman
Date: 17 Nov 92 22:44:18 GMT
Organization: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill


Does anyone know the location of any good gifs of Lynda
Carter (is she still a "supermodel") in her costume as
Wonder Woman?

Mike
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: isc20081@nusunix1.nus.sg (NG SHIH PING)
Subject: Re: THE 5 MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN THE UNIVERSE
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 03:35:44 GMT

Michael C Espinosa (mespinos@kirk.NMSU.Edu) wrote:
: 
: 1.  Sharon Stone
: 2.  Sherilyn Fenn
: 3.  Kathy Ireland
: 4.  Samantha Sims
: 5.  Tara from my Psychology Class
: 
Kindly post a digitised picture of Tara in gif or jpg format please!
--
							The Renegade
**********************************************************************
Origin: Sunny Singapore (ngshihpi@vms.iscs.nus.sg)
			(ngshihpi@ibmunx.iscs.nus.sg)
			(isc20081@nusunix1.nus.sg)
			(isc20081@nusvm.bitnet)
	Your lack of faith disturbs me. -- Darth Vader
**********************************************************************
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: jaf7625@zeus.tamu.edu (The 20 Minute Void)
Subject: 5 MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN IN HILBERT SPACE
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:22:00 GMT

Well, I'd taken a brief holiday from the net only to find this top-5-women 
debate raging on my return ... So, here are my two centissimi:

(These are not in order btw -- when you're in the top 5, that's enough, eh?)

1. Sophie Marceau  (a too little known French actress)
2. Lysette Anthony  (a too little known British actress, the one in _Krull_)
3. Elizabeth Taylor (ca. 1953!!)
4. Marilyn Monroe (ca. 1955)
5. Ariel (of the Little Mermaid) ... Whoooop!

If you know all of these babes, you'll notice that they all have a certain 
feature in common ... Any guesses ...?

                                                               Jake
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:18:27 EST
From: Chris Hoffman <CXH181@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: Kathy Ireland

You bet!!!!!

cxh181@psuvm.psu.edu

flame me!!  and if you're Kathy, PLEASE FLAME ME!!!!!!
From: cf542@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Julio Richard Laredo)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: that's IT!
Date: 20 Nov 92 02:55:23 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Hey, Vic, I still have my automag with spent uranium 
hollowpoints I'm itching to try out.  Point me at the pond
scum and we'll see well they function without knees.

-- 
   BACH gave us God's Word........MOZART gave us God's Laughter
                  BEETHOVEN gave us God's Fire.
   GOD gave us Music that we might pray without words.
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: barrett@fe631.cc.purdue.edu (Brad Barrett)
Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson -- Faint Praise 
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:52:14 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.175422.3033@dragon.acadiau.ca> 890530m@dragon.acadiau.ca (Darren MacKenzie) writes:
>Craig.Humphrey@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Craig Andrew Humphrey) writes:
>
>>pictures for their PS/2 machines, to run as a backdrop under windoze.  Now the
>							      ^^^^^^^
>Learn to spell WINDOWS!!  You know, like the thing you look out to see
>outside while you're indoors!  
>
>>girls who work there have their own PS/2 running windoze 
>						  ^^^^^^^
>
>Once again, learn to spell...and get a life!
>-Doc

Hello novice.  Are you really unfamiliar with the popular Windows
nickname amongst its detractors (of which there are many)?

B.


Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: mostert@cs.sun.ac.za (A. Mostert)
Subject: Please don't post items > than 2000 lines !
Organization: University of Stellenbosch
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:11:09 GMT


As the subject says, please don't post items larger than 2000 lines, it
makes my newsreader die !
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| A. Mostert, Stellenbosch, RSA    | "WAFTI" - GFMTHC, SLATFATF, D. Adams  |
| mostert@cs.sun.ac.za             |                                       |
|__________________________________|_______________________________________|
From: Cindy Crawford- NOT!
Subject: Re: Supermodels contribute to spiraling low self esteem?
Organization: University of Missouri
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 14:37:19 CST

In article <BxsH9p.6FL@quake.sylmar.ca.us>
brian@quake.sylmar.ca.us (Brian K. Yoder) writes:
 
>Perhaps feminists would feel better about themselves if the only pictures
>in magazine ads, posters, etc. were of ugly sloppy pathetic women.  Is that
>a solution to their self-esteem problems?  I doubt it.
>
>--Brian
 
Perhaps 'feminists' would feel better if *some* men didn't act as though
they thought that there were only two types of women- the supermodels
and the 'ugly sloppy pathetic' ones. Jeesh, do *you* do wonders for
a person's self-esteem!
 
Honestly, I usually look much better than this......(sniff*)
 
So what is the solution to low self-esteem, Brian? Do we put
up big billboards "SELF-ESTEEM: GET IT!" ? Do we simply write-off
people with low self-esteem as pathetic losers? I just *hate* it
whenever anyone compliments me- what do they think I am?- some
pathetic ugly woman who needs them to make *me* feel good? I
just wish *everybody* would cut out this common decency and
consideration crap! Why, they are just symptoms of our co-dependent
society- oh yeah, like *everybody* is supposed to think that fat
and ugly and blonde people are JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE! I think
that all the horrible, nasty, pathetic slobs with low self-esteem
should all be piled on a big boat- and set adrift- yeah!
 
(sigh) packing my bags......
 
Diane
 
(who wears the same size as Paulina- in hats....)
 
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
From: lynch@ils.nwu.edu (Richard Lynch)
Subject: Re: Elle MacPherson -- Faint Praise
Organization: The Institute for the Learning Sciences
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 00:49:11 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.222711.8644@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> bhv@areaplg2.corp.mot.com (Bronis Vidugiris) writes:
>In article <19NOV199200232233@venus.tamu.edu> beh7214@venus.tamu.edu (HEAD, BRYAN EVERETT) writes:
>)Summary:  
>)Date: 19 Nov 1992 00:16 CST  
>)Distribution: world
>)Keywords:  
>
>Various people write:
>)> 
>)>>pictures for their PS/2 machines, to run as a backdrop under windoze.  Now the
>)>							      ^^^^^^^
>)>Learn to spell WINDOWS!!  You know, like the thing you look out to see
>)>outside while you're indoors!  
>)> 
>)>>girls who work there have their own PS/2 running windoze 
>   ^^^^^
>
>)>Once again, learn to spell...and get a life!
>)>-Doc
>
>What - no flames about using the word 'girls'?

'girls' generally gets flamed only when in direct contrast with men.
Here, it was 'guys'.  Not perfectly parallel, perhaps, but close enough that
no sexism is present.
-- 
"TANSTAAFL"     Rich lynch@aristotle.ils.nwu.edu
From: int177c@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Jae J Won)
Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Subject: Re: Calendars and Brains
Date: 16 Nov 92 15:06:31 GMT
Organization: Monash University

In article <1992Nov12.102849.10205@wam.umd.edu> rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari) writes:
>In article <1992Nov11.202710.2458@news2.cis.umn.edu> chi@oyster.micro.umn.edu (Ed Huai-hsin Chi) writes:
>>>>   According to the article Elle came in first, the college
>>>>   post-graduates last.
>
>
>	Not that I want to propogate the stereotype that most models,
>	male and female, have the brain capacity that would embarass
>	a corpse, but...
>
>
>>>I wonder how the "smart" readers of this newsgroup did with this
>>>test (aimed at a model's intellect).  Ready to return your degrees 
>>>guys and gals?  I would if this were the only gauge of intelegence.

[whole lotta Elle McPherson Bashing deleted]

Did I spell McPherson right? Well, anyway, I am no big fan of hers but I think
people being too generalizing kinda annoys me sometimes. I have posted this
before but I guess some didn't take notice. Settle this once and for all.
Elle Mcwhatever was a law student in either Uni of NSW or Uni of Sydney until
she decided that modelling was kinda more profitable.
I don't know about other countries but the ones I have been to give me impression
that getting accepted at a law school is not a bimbo's job.

Generalisations do not seem apt in this particular situation IMHO.

Jae