From: kwelch@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Geisha Dawn)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: SNOOPER IN THE NET
Date: 15 Apr 92 19:06:38 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

Patrick
>Kevin
>|> Pat
>|> >Kevin W.

>|> >No, Kevin...you did that well *after* you sent your little whine to Conrad
>|> >so HE could mail it to Susan.  (Why are you responding to something I
>|> >aimed at him, anyway?  Thanks for doing your part to prove my point...)

>|> What is it with you, Pat?  I was asked not to mail Susan so I apologized
>|> the only way I could.  Then when I got mail that I thought was from Susan,
>|> I apologized directly to her then.

>You obviously didn't worry about being asked not to send her mail then, did
>you?

I thought she started a mail conversation with me, so I responded.  That is
free speech.  That is what CETs warned us about.

So, no, I made no bones about contacting her to clarify things.

>That's something that might have worked better if you'd done it in the
>first place -- and somehow, I suspect you didn't bother with explaining any
>of *that* detail to the CETS folks.

This is an assumption, and as usual, Patrick, it's wrong.  CETs knows explicity
what took place, they have copies of all letters I sent and Susan sent.

They know; you do not.  Don't stab into the dark when there's nothing
there.

>|> I did not whine to Conrad.  I simply asked him to do something for me.
>|> I'm not defending his thread here; I'm refuting your statement.

>Or trying to, anyway.

Accomplished.

>|> Why do continually insist on being an ass?  I've brought myself out into
>|> the open and apologized.  Now you keep kicking me while I'm down.

>Well, since you seem to have the same benighted attitude as you did when this
>whole thing blew up in your face, it looks to me like you haven't really
>apologized much, and I'm just pointing out that it sure looks that way to me.


What more do you want me to do?  Send her roses and buy her a car?  I 
apologized and ended the thread.  Whether she forgives me is her prerogative.
And if she doesn't, that's okay.  But I've done all I could, and I will do
no more to indicate I'm sorry.

>I could be wrong, of course -- but you sure haven't given me (or anyone else
>involved in this mess) much of a reason to believe I am.

I have no reason to aplogize to you.  This event was between Susan and me.
She had every right to be angry and I apologized to HER.

So get off my back.

>If you think I'm kicking you, boy, do you have a lot to learn about life.
>Try doing that a little this summer.  (Learning, that is.)

Learn about life, I suppose you have.  But you've not yet learned to prove
assertions that you make, false assumptions, a grave injustice.

>|> Nice philosophy.

>It does for me.  You made your bed, after all.

I make my bed every morning.  Who cares...

>|> >Patrick L. Humphrey  (patrick@is.rice.edu)  Rice Networking & Computing Systems
>|> >    *"The opinions expressed by Patrick do not necessarily represent those
>|> >             of Rice staff, management, or any living person."*
>|> 						^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>|> evident
>
>Back to Remedial Logic for you, son.  Have a nice summer.

I'll enjoy not missing YOU.

>                  All wiyht, rho sritched mg keg tops awound?
>   (It couldn't have been Welch.  He's still figuring out the Sholes layout.)

a he he he
So funny.  So cool.  So you.  So imature.

--
                          -*-  Kevin C. Welch -*-
                    -*- kwelch@eniac.seas.upenn.edu -*-
     And all you have to do is catch me, when I'm back on the real scene.
And all the things that I don't do just make me laugh 'cause they irritate you.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion