From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: Garvin's attempts to tell only half the story
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 22:00:27 GMT

In article <1992Dec24.134910.122@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
>In article <1992Dec23.201930.369@rotag.mi.org>, kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>> In article <1992Dec23.132558.25246@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
>> >In article <1992Dec23.013921.7465@ncsu.edu>, dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
>> >> In article <1992Dec21.003426.21330@rotag.mi.org> 
>> >> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > Gee, seems Susie is perfectly willing to forgive someone who jokes, in 
>> >> > alt.sex, about mass rape and doesn't apologize for it. I wonder if she would 
>> >> > be as forgiving of someone who joked about something equally tasteless in 
>> >> > alt.flame and DID apologize for making a mistake?
>> >> 
>> >> But that would require consistency from Garvin.
>> >> 
>> >
>> >What this little discussion is about is the time Kevin Darcy
>> >accused the victim of child molestation of being a child
>> >molester, then he spent weeks trying to support his remarks,
>> 
>> Huh? Support my remarks? Are you suggesting that, after the initial
>> article and responses, I _still_ claimed that Susie's SO was a child 
>> molester? That's a lie.
>> 
>
>No, stupid, you spent weeks trying to support your remarks,
>not the claim made in them,  You spent weeks trying to justify
>your having made such an idiotic remark.  

Would you not attack the spectacle of a child molester bragging about his
exploits, Dean?

>> I admitted my mistake long before I apologized for it, Dean. Stop trying
>> to rewrite history.
>> 
>
>You took your time about it, kibble.  

What was it? A couple of days, I think. That's not a lot of time in Net
terms.

> >Now The Reverend Douglas Holtsinger seems to find it
>> >inconsistent of Susan to be unforgiving of someone who
>> >called her SO a child molester.
>> 
>> It's inconsistent when she automatically forgives someone who jokes about
>> mass rape, in a relatively "serious" group, and who DOESN'T apologize OR 
>> even admit his error in judgment, yes.
>
>I didn't notice the individual under discussion calling Susan's SO
>a mass rapist 

Stop trying to squirm your way out of this, Dean. Susie is blatantly 
inconsistent because she screams bloody murder over one, shall we say
"tasteless" remark, made by someone who she doesn't particularly like,
and yet defends, against another person she doesn't particularly like, the 
someone else making an equally tasteless remark (if not much more tasteless).
And the fact that the perpetrator hasn't apologized or admitted his mistake,
whereas I did BOTH, just simply compounds and highlights her inconsistency.

>(how do you rape a mass?  I should ask Suzanne Forgach).  

Grow up, little boy.

>And your remarks were not a joke when you made them, 

You just didn't get the punchline. Not my fault.

>...and no
>amount of your attmepts to rewrite history can change the
>fact that you spent weeks trying to justify them on the basis of
>how you read something Don had written.  

I attacked the spectacle of a child molester bragging about his exploits,
Dean.

>You never tried the "It
>was a joke" gag until you had failed to justify yourself for
>a long time before.

I never said it WASN'T framed as a joke, Dean. Where do you get this
bizarre, twisted, distorted idea that I only started claiming it was a
joke AFTER all of the other meta-crapola had subsided? I claimed that from
the very beginning, and all of the way through.

>Geez, stop lying kibble.  If you have to be a fool, be an honest
>fool.  Wear your motley and do your verbal gyrations and give
>an honest accoun tof your idiocy.

Blather.

								- Kevin
Newsgroups: talk.abortion