HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: john.navas@uttsbbs.uucp (John Navas) 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: RE: INTEL MODEMS
Date: 17 Nov 92 12:53:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Transfer Station BBS, Danville, CA - 510-837-4610/837-5591
Reply-To: john.navas@uttsbbs.uucp (John Navas) 

berger@atropa (Mike Berger) writes:

RE:  Intel "SatisFAXtion" 400 modem problems

 JN> * Problems connecting with certain modems, particularly older
 JN> 2400bps and down models.

 > I haven't had this problem at all with my Intel 400/e.  It always
 > connects reliably, even at 1200 and 2400 baud.

Try Galacticom modems, like those used on the Micrografx Support BBS
(214-644-4194).  I also had frequent problems on high-speed
connections that my Sportster 14400 handles effortlessly.

 JN> * Lower throughput than USR and other top data modems,
 JN> particularly on poorer lines.

 > My throughput has been better than the other modems I've compared
 > wth, though I haven't tried a USR.  What speeds are you getting
 > with which software and protocols?

The speed difference with ZMODEM-90 (DSZ/DOS) and ZMODEM (Procomm Plus
for Windows) is around 50cps on ZIP(tm) file transfers at 14400bps.
My system is a 486DX-25.  This is based on carefully controlled and
repeated tests with remote systems with high-quality modems (Hayes and
others) known to be configured properly.

 JN> * Common speaker failures.

 > Is it really common?  This is the first I've heard of it.

My sources are a couple of local dealers and Intel Support.

 JN> * A customer service policy that expects users to pay for fixes
 JN> to certain design defects.

 > What does this mean?  All upgrades to my Intel 400/e have been free
 > so far.

Hardware?  For example, I had one of the original SatisFAXtion modems,
which have a number of hardware design flaws (including failures when
more buffer memory is added).  Intel now has a fix, but it sure isn't
free.  So much for the long warranty.

 > In my experience, a lot of users are just too easily satisfied with
 > a bad product, or they're unaware of poor performance.

I agree.  And others are so brand-loyal that they routinely challenge
negative reports.  ;-)

Best regards,
John
      
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: kent@rahul.net (Kent Talarico)
Subject: Re: Any Digicom Scout+ bugs?
Organization: a2i network
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:54:29 GMT

In article <1eflc8INN8ta@travis.csd.harris.com> mikem@travis.csd.harris.com (Mike McCole) writes:
>As Wolfgang has said, Prodigy is selling Digicom Scout+ external
>modems, Prodigy calls them "Eagles".  They come with a 30 day money back
>guarentee for $199.00 U.S.  I haven't seen ANY bug reports about the
>Digicom Scout+, this seems too good to be true.  Before I buy one from
>Prodigy (I'm a member) I would like to know if anyone has had any trouble
>with the Scout+.  Does the fax work ok?  Does it have any supra like
>wierdnesses?  Does it do high speed connections well to other brand modems?
>Does it have any warts at all?

I have had many problems connecting to the 3 Scout+ modems on this system.

I've never gotten a 14400 connection to one of them. 
I always get either a 9600 or 12000 connect (The speed I get seems to be
randomly determined)
My modem is a ZyXEL 1496E with the latest ROMs. In the year I've had it I've
never had problems connecting to any other brand of modem, even Supras
with old ROMs.

Often the Scout+ hangs up a few seconds after answering.

And many times I find one (or two) of the Scout+ to be in a weird state where
it connects at 4800 then sends out garbage. It then needs to be reset.

-Kent
-- 
Kent Talarico <kent@rahul.net>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: tpaquette@ita.lgc.com (Trevor Paquette)
Subject: T2500 drops connection when going to command mode
Organization: Landmark/ITA Inverse Theory and Applications
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 16:46:28 GMT


  Just as the title says..

    When I type '+++' to drop to comand mode on a T2500 it drops the
 connection after a few seconds.. Has anyone else seen this, and/or
 know how to remedy it?

   Trev

--
Name : Trevor Paquette       | Landmark/ITA             |  _\___ Fahrvergnugen
Email: tpaquette@ita.lgc.com | Calgary, Alberta, Canada | /     \____
Visitor from CyberSpace      | (403) 269-4669           |/ G60       \
Renegade of Virtual Reality  | #include <disclaimer.h>  |\-O------O--/
From: jim@jimmc.chi.il.us (Jim McNicholas)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: zoom VFP!
Date: 19 Nov 92 15:31:25 GMT
Reply-To: jim@jimmc.chi.il.us (Jim McNicholas)
Organization: Prime Time Productions Aurora, Illinois

O.K. before serious flameage comes my way I'm happy with this modem! I just
would like to know if there is a setting other thanAT&F&C1&D2S36=7S95=44.
This is what ZOOM tech support recommends. I am having a problem connecting
with a couple of systems. throughput drops to 180-190cps, which for a 14.4
modem is a little extreme! I know it's only compatible with some modems at
2400 baud but 180-190cps is below the worst 2400 baud connection I've ever
gotten. Yes I've RTFM 13 different prefixes, sorry I'm hoping to avoid having
to go through each and every one of them!  If anyone has a great INIT string
I'd really appreciate it!!

-- 
____________________________________________________________________________
|jim@jimmc.chi.il.us   |   ...And I believe in long, slow, deep, soft wet  |
|Prime Time Productions| kisses that last three days...good night...OH MY! |
|Aurora, IL. 60504     |        -crash davis to annie savoy in BULL DURHAM-|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From: to5232@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Problems with dial back under Windows 3.1
Date: 23 Nov 92 20:19:56 -0600
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

I am having a problem getting Dial back to work under Windows.  I regularly log
into a system that has dial back security.  I can log into the system fine but
when I dials back and I try to answer (through modem commands of course), my
machine freezes up.  I believe is related to screen resolution that I am using. 
I have noticed the following:

1.      Dial back will only work under enhanced mode when using the generic
        VGA.DRV.  Any other video drivers will cause the machine to freeze.

2.      I can get dial back to work using 8514\a emulation when running windows
        under standard mode.  This is not satisfactory since I still have DOS
        apps that I still use.

I have a Gateway 486DX33, with a ATI Graphics Ultra Card, an ATI 2400 etc/i
modem, a Microsoft Bus Mouse.  Could someone please explain to my why I cannot
get dial back to work under the environment I would like to under?  Can anyone
suggest to me a way that I can get this to work?

Please respond directly to me, since I do not regularly read this newsgroup.  I
will be happy to post a summary of responses.

TO5232@ISCSVAX.UNI.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: rdg@world.std.com (R. Goldstein)
Subject: Connecting a Cardinal v.32 modem to a TwinCom V.32bis modem???
Summary: I need help with connecting a Cardinal v.32 modem to a TwinCom v.32bis 
Keywords: Help Cardinal TwinCom v.32 v.32bis yuck!
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 22:26:58 GMT

Hi... I think the subject says it all.

I have a TwinCom v.32bis/v.42bis modem with 14.4 fax (rockwell chipset) and
am trying to connect to a friend's BBS (wildcat software) which is running
a Cardinal v.32/v.42bis modem with 9600 fax (unknown chipset).

At high speeds, anyway, it dosen't seem possible!  I can hear the negotiation,
but it appears as though the Cardinal is NOT going through the v.32 step
down, at least from the tones... It ultimately winds up that the modems
just whistle at each other!  

I have been able to connect at 2400 baud by setting s48 to 128, s37 to 6 and
locking my comm program to 2400 baud.

Any suggestions on how to move to a faster speed?

Many thanks!...   Rich G.

-- 
Richard D. Goldstein
Schiller & Kusmer
Patent Attorneys At Law
(617) 227-5454 Telephone
From: jcburt@gatsibm.larc.nasa.gov ()
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Infotel Modem
Date: 16 Nov 1992 13:24:12 GMT
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center
NNTP-Posting-Host: gatsibm.larc.nasa.gov

In article <Bxq3LG.GAu@world.std.com> rdg@world.std.com (R. Goldstein) writes:
>funnyfin@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu writes:

[...stuff deleted...]

>>send/fax, v42bis MNP-5, maximum throughput up to 57600. But it has a bad habit
>>of detecting NO CARRIER at anytime, no matter what you're doing. (My last
>>NO CARRIER hang-up was two minutes ago when I tried to post this article, I

[...stuff deleted...]

>suffering from a IRQ conflict, or perhaps some real bad line noise.  
>

[...more stuff deleted...]

>Also FYI, one modem has ROCKWELL ROM1.2 aand the other ROCKWELL ROM 1.27.
>Do an ATI3 and see if you are up to date.

Perhaps it is just a coincidence, but the symptoms mentioned fit very closely
with the problems I've been having with Gateway Telepath modems, which *also*
use the Rockwell chipset...I've narrowed it down to, I consistently have the
problem (NO CARRIER after several minutes into the connection) when I dial into
modems that are on the far side of a private switch board (remote modem is located
on a private telephone system, such as for a large company or university). If the
remote modem is directly on a telco line, then I don't have any problems (since my
modem is at my house, directly on a telco line...). The line quality is excellent
(as reported by my modem), and rarely needs to retrain (fallback/fallforward)...

Hope this helps some...if this *is* the same as your problem, then perhaps it's
the Rockwell chipset that has problems under these conditions?

John
From: n8743196@henson.cc.wwu.edu (Jeff Wandling)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: AT command set for Zoom 2400b?
Summary: need command set, registers and function
Keywords: hayes zoom
Date: 18 Nov 92 09:56:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: henson.1992Nov18.095630.15222
Distribution: comp
Organization: Howling Dog

Hi,

  I'm looking for a file with the AT command set and register names
and functions for a zoom modem (2400b).  Something like:

ATZ  -- reset
... 
...
etc..
S0   -- auto answer
...
...
etc...

If you have one or know were I can ftp such a file, please tell me.

Thanks,

-- 
perl -e '$a="Japhuneasorcttlk h eae r r ,";$]=0;$s=$];while($s<4){do{$_ .= pack
("c",vec($a,$],8));$]+=4;}while($]<length($a)&&vec($a,$],8)!=32);$s++;$]=$s;$_
.= ' ';}chop;print;' Jeff Wandling  <jdw@physics.wwu.edu>  "will hack for food"
From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: PEP over SLIP?
Date: 18 Nov 92 22:55:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: volitans.BOB.92Nov18175532
	<1992Nov18.041109.17680@uxmail.ust.hk>
Organization: Morning Star Technologies

In article <1992Nov18.041109.17680@uxmail.ust.hk> coggs@Cogwheel.COM (Bob Coggeshall) writes:
   In article <1992Nov16.213034.27895@eos.arc.nasa.gov>, ssmith@eos.arc.nasa.gov (Stephen Smith) writes:
      Is it possible to use SLIP over a PEP connection? 

   It'll run but practical performance will suffer because PEP is not
   a symmetric protcol. ie) it gives you gobs of bandwidth in only one
   direction at a time, and the modems must renegotiate to change the
   direction. This might not cause you much problem if the majority of
   your traffic is in one direction, but with an arbitrary IP link
   between to LANs, you can't really predict that.

Even with only a single FTP stream traversing the link in one
direction, the returning TCP ACKs (even VJ-compressed) usually require
a large PEP packet, and thus trigger a carrier turnaround.
Performance (both throughput and latency) degrades under increased
offered load much more catastrophically with PEP than with V.32bis.

We recommend that people use PEP or TurboPEP for their PPP or SLIP
connections only in those situations where the modems are unable to
hold the line with a standard full-duplex carrier.

   IMHOP, You are better off to run V.32

or V.32bis, or any of the true full-duplex pre-V.fast hopefuls.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: coggs@Cogwheel.COM (Bob Coggeshall)
Subject: Re: PEP over SLIP?
Keywords: SLIP PEP
Reply-To: coggs@Cogwheel.COM
Organization: Cogwheel - Boulder * Hong Kong
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 04:11:09 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.213034.27895@eos.arc.nasa.gov>, ssmith@eos.arc.nasa.gov (Stephen Smith) writes:
|> Is it possible to use SLIP over a PEP connection? 
|> I appologize if this is a FAQ.

It'll run but practical performance will suffer because PEP is not a
symmetric protcol. ie) it gives you gobs of bandwidth in only one direction
at a time, and the modems must renegotiate to change the direction. This
might not cause you much problem if the majority of your traffic is in one
direction, but with an arbitrary IP link between to LANs, you can't really
predict that.

IMHOP, You are better off to run V.32

-- 
    ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    Bob Coggeshall, President
    Cogwheel Incorporated - Producers of Low-cost dial-up IP Routers
    coggs@Cogwheel.COM
    ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: jdesai@morpheus.irbdg.East.Sun.COM (Jatin Desai -- Contractor)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Opinions about ZOOM 14.4K FAX modem?
Date: 19 Nov 92 14:56:19 GMT
Organization: ILU Computers
NNTP-Posting-Host: morpheus.east.sun.com
In-reply-to: lars@spectrum.CMC.COM's message of 18 Nov 92 05:56:03 GMT


> To effectively troubleshoot such problems, you need to collect very
> detailed information. You mention the brand of your modem and fax
> software, but neglect to give any specific revision information. You
> should also collect a list of specific remote machines that you have had
> good experiences with, as well as ones that you have had problems with,
> and what the problem was, and whether the problem persisted on a retry.

I am sorry, but I just want a modem that works. I spend enough time
debugging my own software. I do not have time to debug someone elses.
Even if I was willing to spend time/money figuring out what was going on,
I would have very hard time figuring out what kind of FAX the other party:
has "Excuse me Mr/Ms.xxx could you run down to the mail room and check the
fax model number on your fax machine?". I want to be able to connect to
all faxes out there (old and new). 

I guess I will just have to buy a good old regular fax machine.

Thanks for the interest though,

Jatin Desai
____________________________________________________________________________
Email:	jdesai@ilu.com	or	Jatin.Desai@East.Sun.Com (current contract)
Phone:	(603) 595-4704	or	(617) 259-2056 		 (current contract)

Address:
ILU Computers
5-B Lampron Street 
Hudson, NH 03051

--
Jatin Desai
____________________________________________________________________________
Email:	jdesai@ilu.com	or	Jatin.Desai@East.Sun.Com (current contract)
Phone:	(603) 595-4704	or	(617) 259-2056 		 (current contract)

Address:
ILU Computers
5-B Lampron Street 
Hudson, NH 03051
From: mikem@travis.csd.harris.com (Mike McCole)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Any Digicom Scout+ bugs?
Date: 19 Nov 1992 04:05:12 -0500
Organization: Harris CSD, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: travis.csd.harris.com

As Wolfgang has said, Prodigy is selling Digicom Scout+ external
modems, Prodigy calls them "Eagles".  They come with a 30 day money back
guarentee for $199.00 U.S.  I haven't seen ANY bug reports about the
Digicom Scout+, this seems too good to be true.  Before I buy one from
Prodigy (I'm a member) I would like to know if anyone has had any trouble
with the Scout+.  Does the fax work ok?  Does it have any supra like
wierdnesses?  Does it do high speed connections well to other brand modems?
Does it have any warts at all?
 

  Mike

__
  mikem@travis.csd.harris.com  Mike McCole  305-973-5466
  2101 W. Cypress Creek Road  Ft. Lauderdale FL 33309 MS 143
  All opinions expressed are mine, not Harris Corporations.
From: monty%roscom@think.com (Monty Solomon)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: What Equipment is Required For Switched 56k?
Date: 17 Nov 92 11:33:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: proponen.1992Nov17.113337.4700
Reply-To: Monty Solomon <roscom!monty@think.com>
Organization: Proponent

We have several sites around the country that we want to connect via
TCP/IP using something like switched 56k service.

What equipment is required at each location?  What are the typical
startup and recurring charges for this class of service.

What other alternatives are available besides switched 56k service?

Several of the sites are in the greater San Francisco/San Jose area.  What
kind of services and rates does PacBell offer? 

Thanks.

Monty

-- 
# Monty Solomon / PO Box 2486 / Framingham, MA  01701-0405
# monty%roscom@think.com
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:16915 comp.dcom.fax:2130
From: ja@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jay Ashcraft)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.dcom.fax
Subject: T-3000 + Fax Upgrade
Keywords: T-3000 fax WorldBlaer upgrade
Date: 17 Nov 92 02:57:19 GMT
Reply-To: ja@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jay Ashcraft)
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX
Originator: ja@minnie.cc.utexas.edu

Well I received a card from Telebit today saying that the T-3000
will be shipping December 1st with fax at 9600 bps send/receive.

My question is that I just got my WorldBlazer upgrade
and am wondering what the difference would be in the T-3000 w/fax
and the WorldBlazer?  

Also, where the serial #'s will start for upgrades and if my
WorldBlazer is upgradable and how much it will cost?

The flyer says buy a T-3000 today and get a $75 rebate and
a free fax upgrade worth $149.

I already have $850 in my WorldBlazer don't know if $149 more 
for Fax is worth it?  Any ideas?

Jay Ashcraft
ashcraft@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Subject: Re: PEP over SLIP?
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 08:37:23 GMT

vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes:
>In article <BOB.92Nov18175532@volitans.MorningStar.Com>, bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes:
>> ...
>> 
>> Even with only a single FTP stream traversing the link in one
>> direction, the returning TCP ACKs (even VJ-compressed) usually require
>> a large PEP packet,
>
>Are you sure?  I thought the magic number was 12 bytes.
>12 is much larger than any reasonable VJ-compressed ACK.
>

Perhaps Bob is talking about situations where small SLIP packets are
being used, so the receiver is able to return several ACKs to the modem
before the line turns around?

>
>>                     and thus trigger a carrier turnaround.
>
>I've seen plenty of strange turnarrounds--rather, heard them with the
>speaker on.  But only during light loading.  The worst case I know of
>is `ping`.  The ICMP ECHO's seem to hit the modems at just the wrong
>times, causing them to waste lots of time switching packet sizes and
>turning the line around.
>
>> Performance (both throughput and latency) degrades under increased
>> offered load much more catastrophically with PEP than with V.32bis.
>
>Are you sure?  From my experience, PEP does best when loaded.
>It does worst with light traffic, such as interactive stuff.
>
>I just don't see how SLIP/PEP can "degrade under [increased] offered
>load."  With increased load, the modems turn the line around less
>frequently, thereby wasting less bandwidth.  "Collapse" would require
>just the opposite, decreased effecency with increased offered load
>

If Bob's "offered load" is multiple TCP sessions, he could again be
describing a link that's returning multiple ACKs to the modem before
the line turns around.  If the SLIP packets were small, the results
would probably be as bad as he indicates.

However, with a link that can send large packets through the modems,
only one or two ACKs would be waiting when the modems turn the line
around.  No extra overhead is generated.


-- 
 .------------------------------------------------------------------.
 |  Greg Andrews   |       UUCP: {amdahl,claris}!netcom!gerg        |
 |                 |   Internet: gerg@netcom.COM                    |
 `------------------------------------------------------------------'
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: leec4@rpi.edu (CD LEE)
Subject: Any one use ZyXEL on Mac?
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 01:56:32 GMT

I need some info about the ZyXEL using on Mac. Is the fax working?

CD LEE, Chun-Da Lee                                 leec4@rpi.edu
ITS Consultant, ITS=Information Technology Service  CD_Lee@MTS.RPI.EDU
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: shim@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Sam Shim)
Subject: Re: Experience with Digicomm? (Not Digicom)
Keywords: digicom, v.32bis, scout
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:10:43 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.235844.27115@selway.umt.edu> garion@selway.umt.edu (Jason Curnow) writes:
>I'm in the market for a v.32bis modem, and saw that they had one
>at Software Etc. today, and wanted to know if anyone has used them
>at all..  The brand name is Digicom and model is Scout Plus.  It's a 
>full v.32bis modem w/ send and receive fax for $199.  Sounds like a pretty
>good deal to me unless it has a lot of problems like the Telepath.

It's a Digicomm (2 m's) modem, not a Digicom (1 m) modem.  I believe Digicom
makes high quality modems/telecommunications equipment, while Digicomm is
a cheap copy of that name.

-Sam-
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.protocols.misc
From: souva@aibn58.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Ignatios Souvatzis)
Subject: WANTED: v42 / LAP-M specification
Reply-To: isouvatzis@babsy.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
Organization: Radioastronomisches Institut der Universitaet Bonn, Bonn, FRG
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 17:57:27 GMT

Is it possible to spend some cpu cycles and use a plain 2400 baud
modem in synchrounous mode with to talk to a V42[bis] modem?

Where can I find the V42 (-bis) specification in an understandable
version?

--
Paper mail: Ignatios Souvatzis, Radioastronomisches Institut der 
            Universitaet Bonn, Auf dem Huegel 71, D-5300 Bonn 1, FRG
Internet:   souva@babsy.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de
From: kc2x+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kwan-Ju Chen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ZyXEL ZFAX
Date: 21 Nov 92 18:44:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.4f3l0J600awSQLYEM5
Organization: Junior, IM - H&SS Track, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


How do I send, receive, and record voice with ZFAX?  After having this
modem for 2 weeks I still can't figure out how it works.  Please give me
a detail description.  Some examples will be appreciated.  I can't
follow the manual at all.

thanks
From: dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca (dixon kenner)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: UART 16550 chip compatibles?
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 21:41:04 -05
Distribution: world
Organization: FourFold Symmetry, Breckenridge, Quebec

rdippold@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold) writes:

> Oooooh, not much, just that the 16550 doesn't work.  Well, it does
> work as a 16450/8250, but they screwed up the 16-byte buffer so that
> it doesn't work.  Not very useful.  The 16550A was produced to fix
> this problem.

Thanks for the info.  Happily all my 16550's are of the (A) variety.

On a different note, I am involved in the testing and decision process to
procure approx. 1,000 - 1,200 modems.

The modems must be able to handle v32bis or faster speeds and will be used
in an distributed operations environment across the country.

Besides getting in a selected number of modems to test on the poor rural
phone lines across Canada, would anyone have any data on tests done on
current modems, reliability etc?  Any data of information would be useful,
and appreciated in coming to a conclusion before January for purchase
later in 1993.

I can be reached via e-mail at dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca

Thx,



--
dixon kenner, dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca
FourFold Symmetry, Breckenridge, Quebec, Canada 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems