HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: smmurthy@comet.lerc.nasa.gov (PLN Murthy)
Subject: Mchess-Pro Help needed
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
  I need help with the analysis feature of Mchess-Pro. I could set up the positi  on I wanted without much difficulty.  But I am not sure what is the best way o  of seeting fo analysis and saving the analysis in a file so that I can look at
  it later. Any help in this matter is appreciate.  Also, I would like to how to  reset the colors (vga pieces) if they were accidentally altered and saved,      without actually reinstalling. 
  Thanking you in advance, Murthy
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 13:14:51 GMT

-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLN Murthy			|     phone: 216-433-4000
NASA Lewis Research Center     	|    
Cleveland, Ohio  44135         	|     email: smmurthy@comet.lerc.nasa.gov 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: mcohan@scripps.edu (Max Cohan)
Subject: Re: Should r.g.c be split?
Organization: The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 07:00:48 GMT


Personally I see several threads here:

1) novice chess questions, general chess how-to's, FAQ stuff, etc.
2) GAME discussion, both online and 'real' tournament
3) online chess usage, chess programs (self-contained and shell)
4) chess Programming, chess database, etc.
5) chess related crap '10-year old master' etc.

how about this:

rec.games.chess - chess crap, general questions
rec.games.chess.games - sounds redundant but discussion of chess GAMES
rec.games.chess.novice - novice questions obviously
rec.games.chess.programs - programs and programming

basically no .<something> MEANS misc in my eyes
people looking for specific things will look for them where appropriate

any objections suggestions etc?



Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: Lisa Bahler <bahler@thumper.bellcore.com>
Subject: chess clubs for children around Philadelphia
Organization: Bellcore
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 20:38:14 GMT

I'm looking for pointers for chess clubs for children in the Philadelphia
area.
Thanks,
Lisa
From: jaa+@F.GP.CS.CMU.EDU (James Altucher)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Saemisch variation in the KID
Date: 7 Jan 93 19:57:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.C0I24D.Jo3.2
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Originator: jaa@F.GP.CS.CMU.EDU



   Does anyone have any thoughts on 

       1. d4    Nf6
       2. c4    g6
       3. Nc3   Bg7
       4. e4    d6
       5. f3    o-o
       6. Be3   b6!?

   The idea is to get in c5 and take with the b-pawn if 
   white exchanges. 

       7. Bd3 is supposed to be the correct reponse so that if
    8...   c5 then white plays e5 and Be4, picking off the rook. 

  So what should Black's response be to Bd3? I've seen games with
      a6, Bb7, and e6 but nothing seemed really conclusive one way or 
   the other. Is there anyone out there who plays this line and 
   prefers one of these moves over any other and has some evidence?

   Thanks.

    -james
From: linb@ucs.orst.edu (Benjamin Lin)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Guatemalan Defense?
Date: 8 Jan 93 22:38:19 GMT
Article-I.D.: gaia.1ikvorINNnq1
Distribution: world
Organization: University Computing Services - OSU
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucs.orst.edu

What is the Guatemalan Defense?  Was it invented there?  What are
the moves?  

-benoni
 
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: frants@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Leonid Frants)
Subject: Re: Leonid--the new Sven!
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 20:38:30 GMT

In article <1993Jan2.232612.789@uoft02.utoledo.edu> dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
>In article <1993Jan3.013408.27978@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, frants@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Leonid Frants) writes:

>> Because the other people are too nice to morons like you, while I have
>> very little tolerance for them.
>
>Actually, those people were not posting in my favor, they were posting against
>your ad homomin attacks.
>


While I may have missed the posts you are referring to because of
the amount of shit you post here and while I could even understand why
they could be upset the basic fact remains - you are a MORON.


>Better go back and rethink you logic, they were posting AGAINST you.
>
>But, I suppose if they are against your well-structered debate, they must be
>morons too.
>

The fact that you think of the drivel you post as debate (let alone
well-structured) is yet another confirmation that you are an idiot.

>You know, it must be so nice to live a world as simple as yours. You are right
>and everyone else is wrong and if they point out where you are wrong, you call
>them names and run away from the issues.
>

You are dreaming. I only made one point about you being an idiot and I
am obviously right there. I only call YOU an IDIOT and you are an
IDIOT if you think I will allow you to change my words.

>> 
>>>Maybe you really represent the collective conscience of the terminally
>>>unconscious...
>>>
>> 
>> Yeah, right. I hear the subconscious voice of Don Wedding - well
>> actually not so subconscious...
>> 
>
>Still can't read who you're writing to yet, 'eh? What a shame.
>


There is no question - you are Don Wedding.

>> No error at all. The account is in the name of DCROSGR but the poster
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>de-lu-sion n. 1. a deluding or being deluded  2. a false belief, specif. one
>that persists psychotically.
>
>You know Leonid, you have to admit your sickness to yourself before you can get
>better...
>
>> is Don Wedding.
>
>I really don't know if you are playing  a joke here or are really deluding
>yourself into believing there is only one person.
>
>Well, this is going to come as a surprise to you, but Mr. Wedding is not the
>only person who can make mincemeat out of a crybaby like you. I am doing it as
>well, and I am certain most of the readers on here can do the same.
>

You have to do better than that I am afraid. You have to prove that
you are NOT Don Wedding. Until you can do that you are Don Wedding. 

>
>Please, Leonid, complete sentences! This is run on between a sentence and a
>fragment!
>
>DO learn some sytax skills during your rest!
>              ^^^^^  
>AND the use of commas. 
>
>


What exactly is a sytax skill? Is that some legal concept unknown to
me?

Moral: do not get into spelling/grammar wars if your name is Don
Wedding.


So long, sucker.

Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: tobill@mac.lerc.nasa.gov (William B. Wright)
Subject: Re: Softwares & Ratings !
Reply-To: tobill@mac.lerc.nasa.gov (William B. Wright)
Organization: Sverdrup Technology, Inc.
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 19:37:16 GMT

You should know that Sargon III is not System 7 compatible and will probably 
not be upgraded. I found this out after calling their tech support. All the 
programs I have seen on Macintosh (Chessmaster 2100, Sargon III, Checkmate) 
all have serious flaws both in features and strength of play

The iceman cometh!
From: monaghan@cac.washington.edu (Tracy Monaghan )
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: A game of chess with dmc!?
Date: 5 Jan 1993 00:09:57 GMT
Organization: UW Computing
NNTP-Posting-Host: red2.cac.washington.edu

In article <1993Jan4.164222.815@uoft02.utoledo.edu> dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
>> 
>> Until such time, through your posts, that you demostrate even an understanding
>> of chess moves, your knowledge of the game will remain suspect, your
>> extensive high school tournament experience notwithstanding ;^)
>
>OK, how do we know YOU know how to play?

I've never made such a claim (my extensive high school tournament
experience notwithstanding :), in fact, in posting questions to this
newsgroup, I've always post warnings of my fish-ness.

>
>And, please don't just post moves, as that will mean you have someone helping
>you!!!
>
>Gee, kinda hard to prove something to a closed mind, huh?
>
I have no real desire to 'prove' anything to you.
My only desire is to improve my play, such as it is.
You, having shown that you argue for the sake of argument (not necessarily
a negative trait, but probably inappropriate in this medium), do nothing
to improve my chess.
If you disagree with someone's analysis, post yours.
I don't really care whether Fischer's game has slipped, my only concern
(re: this newsgroup) is preventing my game from slipping (more).
From: steven@Chemeng.Ed.Ac.Uk (Steven Rix)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: Volga/Benko Gambit help
Date: 5 Jan 93 10:38:56 GMT
Reply-To: steven@Chemeng.Ed.Ac.Uk
Organization: Edinburgh University Chemical Engineering Department.
NNTP-Posting-Host: gour.chemeng.ed.ac.uk

Play the Nescafe Frappe Attack! Read the recent book by Graham Burgess (published
by Chess Enterprises). For non-believers, the line goes

1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 c5 3 d5 b5 4 cb a6 5 Nc3 ab 6 e4 b4 7 Nb5 d6 8 Bc4, 

when Black has every chance of getting his head kicked in.

Steve
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: stein@tellabs.com (stein)
Subject: Re: Nice Pieces!
Organization: Tellabs, Inc.
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 18:59:09 GMT


From: science@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Mark Zimmermann)

>I concur with Randy --- the USCF "Kasparov" set & board that I got
>several months ago is *very* nice, particularly for the price ... and
>I don't actually mind USCF's advertisements (they're arguably less
>fluffy than most advertising I see these days, and always seem honest
>enough; who is that model in the catalog, anyway?:-) ...
	 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I share that sentiment. The advertisements are now the first things I look at! :-)
Could she be a regular USCF staff member? Elliott what's the scoop?
Whoever she is, she's a lot cuter than Art Bisguier! :-)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: wbralick@afit.af.mil (Will Bralick)
Subject: PC chess program recommendations sought
Organization: Self-similar
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 03:05:10 GMT


I will be travelling for awhile and will have the use of a Dauphin 1050 
(386-SX) laptop with Windows 3.1, 4 Meg of memory and 100 Mb hard disk.

Question:  if you had <= $70 to spend on a chess program to run on the
above platform, what program would you choose?  I need to know in a
hurry, so any recommendations would be appreciated!

Regards,

-- 

Will Bralick			          Speaking _only_ for myself.

Standard disclaimers apply.            Void where prohibitted by law.
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: spin@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Jeremy Spinrad)
Subject: Janowski Defense
Organization: Chessnews list (chessnews-request@tssi.com)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 16:28:30 GMT



   The Janowski variation of the queen's gambit declined runs as follows:
1. P-Q4 P-Q4 2. P-QB4 P-K3 3. N-QB3 P-QR3.
   The idea is that black threatens PxP, and after the recapture will play
... P-QN4 and develop the QB on QN2. The line recommended by Horowitz for white
is 4. PxP! PxP 5. B-B4 N-KB3 6. P-K3 B-Q3 7. BxB QxB 8. B-Q3 +/-. On the
other hand, Tartakower and DuMont give the same moves through move 7, and
end with the comment that black has avoided all danger.

   On my own, I tend to agree with both assessments. White seems to have a
slight edge based on development, but black has no real weaknesses and a
free game. This would seem to make the Janowski an excellent choice against
a higher rated player; black has good drawing chances, and there
are far fewer tricky sidelines to know than most openings. In the past, I
have played the Slav vs. high rated players, and often end up in far worse 
looking positions from the opening. Psychologically, the Janowski has the
advantage of surprise and getting to an open game against a QP player who
may prefer closed games.
   However, the Janowski (essentially) never appears in modern play, and was
rare enough in the old days as well. Is the final position that bad for black,
or is there an alternative line which refutes the Janowski?
   By the way, I would like to publicly thank Mark Ginsburg for taking the
time to respond to my strange opening questions. 

Jerry Spinrad
From: dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: I will accept DMC's challenge!! (was Re: DMC vs. Harper)
Date: 4 Jan 93 13:16:46 EST
Distribution: world
Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services

In article <1i9phlINNflc@life.ai.mit.edu>, joltman@cookie-crisp.ai.mit.edu (T. Andy Frakes) writes:
> In article <1i5r59INNn0u@meaddata.meaddata.com>, kcy@meaddata.com (Cheong Yu) writes:
> |> Since I live in Dayton, Ohio, which is only a few hours drive from
> |> Toledo, I will accept the challenge.  I will offer to drive to the
> |> Univ. of Toledo and play you a three game match.  I would rather play
> |> a match than a single game, because I want to make sure I gain
> |> something from the trip.  However, I'm only rated about 1650 USCF, so
> |> I'm even more worthless than non-GM Bruce Harper :-).  Since you're
> |> willing to play someone of Bruce's strength (an Expert or Master, I
> |> forget which), you should have an easy time beating a Class B player
> |> like me.  If you win the match (which you should, considering your
> |> strength), you can post the games here with appropriate analysis so
> |> that I and the rest of the readers can learn from the games.  (Post
> |> mortem analysis is standard tournament ettiquite, don't you agree?).
> |> If I should win the match by some miracle (I have never beaten an
> |> Expert or Master), I would post the games and the analysis would
> |> probably be more worthless than GM Benjamin's of FS II. :-)
> |> 
> |> So how about it, DMC?  I would save you a plane ticket because I would
> |> be willing to drive to Toledo.  Do you want to play?
> |> --
> |> Cheong Yu             |                        |        (513) 865-7048
> |> Mead Data Central     |                        |   Fax: (513) 865-1755
> |> P.O. Box 933          |                        |      kcy@meaddata.com
> |> Dayton, Ohio  45401   |                        |    uunet!meaddata!kcy
> 
> Why don't you both come over here to Cleveland and I will be arbiter?
> 
> ================================================================
> =             T. Andy Frakes (joltman@ai.mit.edu)              =
> =                                                              =
> = This user does not believe in smiley faces.  Insert your own =
> ================================================================

Yeah. Right. Mr. Impartial himself. Why not just declare me the loser right now
and save both of us the drive?
From: jonah@cco.caltech.edu (Jonah Michaud)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Did the USCC have more than 11 rounds?  Because
Date: 10 Jan 1993 08:13:37 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: globie.caltech.edu
Summary: Maybe Im ignorant and maybe not, I dont know.
Keywords: US Chess Championship Rounds





Sorry for the bother, but did the USCC have more than 11 rounds?  Because I 
only have the first 11.  If Elliott or someone else with a kind heart could 
post/repost them then that would be great.
						     -jonah@cco.caltech.edu

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A:  "As for myself, Im an atheist."     |    If my employer doesnt share my
B:  "Oh, you mean youre an agnostic?"   |    opinions, damn it, he should.
From: hakan@terminus.ericsson.se (Hakan Nohre)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: looking for chesstool for Sun
Date: 12 Jan 93 09:53:52 GMT
Reply-To: hakan@terminus.ericsson.se
Organization: Camtec Electronics (Ericsson), Leicester, England

I have tried to run gnuchess with xchess, but I found that gnuchess 
played much worse (quicker) than normal. It does not seem possible to select level
when running with xchess.

Help mostly appreciated.

Yours Grapefully,

Hakan
Lines: 35
Date: Fri,  8 Jan 93 08:46:34 MST
From: jensen@baloo.ee.byu.edu (Curtis Jensen)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Robatch Defense -- any ideas?

In trying to find an unusual response to 1.e4, I stumbled on the
Robatsch Defense.  I found two lines which are as follows:

1. e4	g6
2. d4	Bg7
3. Nc3	d6
4. f4	c6
5. Nf3	Bg4
6. Be3	Qb6
7. Qd2	Bxf3
8. gxf3 Qxb2
9. Rb1	Qa3
10.Rxb7 Nd7
11.Rb3	...


1. e4	g6
2. d4 	Bg7
3. Nf3	d6
4. Nc3	Bg4
5. Be3	Nc6
6. Be2	e5
7. d5	Nce7
8. Nd2	Bd7
9. O-O	f5
10.f4	fxe4
11.Ndxe4 Nf5
12.Bc1	...

The unfortunate thing is that I cannot find any commentary or Master
games with this opening.  If someone could post anything on this
opening (such as different lines, who has the advantage in these lines
or games using this opening) I would appreciate it.

Curtis Jensen
From: muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au (Murray Chapman)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: Help! Chess game in Blade Runner
Date: 8 Jan 93 00:42:18 GMT
Reply-To: muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au

In <C0Gu93.Mw9@world.std.com> ekw@world.std.com (Elliott C Winslow) writes:

>In article <BOB.93Jan6130205@dolores.Stanford.EDU>
>bob@dolores.Stanford.EDU (Bob Lodenkamper) writes:
>> In article <HCN.93Jan6152638@calvin.inesc.pt>
>> hcn@calvin.inesc.pt (Horacio Neto) writes:

>I presume you saw that multi-interview in some trend-ish magazine a couple
>months ago...

Nope!  I've been told about it sine I started the FAQ, but!

>Is there a newsgroup regarding this movie explicitly?

Not really, but there's usually a BR thread in alt.cult-movies.


Murray
--
~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^
  Murray Chapman                           muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au
  University of Queensland                 How many lightbulb jokes does it
  Brisbane, Australia                      take to change the subject?
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: jonathan@cs.UAlberta.CA (Jonathan Schaeffer)
Subject: Re: checkers
Organization: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 18:09:17 GMT

dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:

>>>It is finished. They don't even work on the programs anymore as the maximum
>>>number of permitations is EASILY crunched by your average home PC.

Sorry, but I am reminded of a DMC quote from a previous article:

	If you open your mouth, and make assertions you don't feel
	you can back up, why do you make them in the first place?
>Please, a cite so I can do more research.

Some publications that might be available in your libraray on Chinook
include:

     1.   Jonathan Schaeffer, Joseph Culberson,  Norman  Treloar,
          Brent  Knight,  Paul  Lu  and  Duane  Szafron, "A World
          Championship  Caliber  Checkers  Program",   Artificial
          Intelligence, Vol. 53, No. 2-3, 1992, pp. 273-290.

     2.   Jonathan Schaeffer, "Checkers: A Preview of  What  Will
          Happen   in   Chess?",  Journal  of  the  International
          Computer Chess Association, Vol. 14, No. 2,  1991,  pp.
          71-78.

     3.   Jonathan Schaeffer, Joseph Culberson,  Norman  Treloar,
          Brent  Knight,  Paul Lu and Duane Szafron, Reviving the
          Game  of  Checkers,   in   Heuristic   Programming   in
          Artificial  Intelligence; The Second Computer Olympiad,
          D.N.L. Levy and D.F. Beal (ed.), Ellis Horwood, London,
          1991,  pp. 119-136.

     4.   Jonathan Schaeffer, Joseph Culberson,  Norman  Treloar,
          Brent  Knight,  Paul  Lu  and  Duane Szafron, "Checkers
          Program to Challenge for  World  Championship",  SIGART
          Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1991, pp. 3-5.

As well, there is a technical report describing the Chinook-Tinsley
match available by ftp from menaik.cs.ualberta.ca in the file

	/usr/menaik/ftp/pub/TechReports/TR92-19/TR92-19.ps
From: spin@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Jeremy Spinrad)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Janowski with 4. P-QR4 (play the Hennig Schara)
Date: 8 Jan 93 15:40:13 GMT
Organization: Chessnews list (chessnews-request@tssi.com)
NNTP-Posting-Host: helios.unl.edu



  In article 14486, Jeff Lesser asks about 4. P-QR4 vs. the Janowski defense
(1. P-Q4 P-Q4 2. P-QB4 P-K3 3. N-QB3 P-QR3). To the practical player, this is
an important question; I know from playing the O'Kelly variation of the 
Sicilian that many players respond instinctively to P-QR3 with P-QR4.
I believe that black will gain the advantage in the majority of games with
this line by transposing to the obscure (but easy to learn) Hennig-Schara
gambit of the Tarrasch defense, which I think becomes wildly favorable for 
black in this line, as we will see. Therefore, I recommend:
  
4. ... P-QB4 5. BPxP BPxP (the Hennig Schara). White's "refuting" move here
is Q-R4+, and is unavailable. A master would go into a long think here, but
others will follow another line of the gambit with 6. QxP N-QB3 7. Q-Q1 PxP
8. QxP B-K3 9. QxQ+ RxQ 10. P-K3 N-N5 and now in the main line white has
B-N5+ as a saving move, allowing him to avoid loss of material by K-B1.
This is not available to white in our line; as I see it, white must lose 
material. These moves are surprisingly natural and (after QxP) nearly
forced if white is trying for an advantage. Therefore, I think white would
be advised to go immediately into the "lesser" Tarrasch lines with 5. N-B3
or 5. P-K3, which are not dangerous for black; the move P-QR3 seems to be much
more useful for black in these lines than P-QR4 is for white, anyway.

Jerry Spinrad
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: mkukkone@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Mika Kukkonen)
Subject: Re: English Opening question
Organization: University of Helsinki
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 16:02:15 GMT

In <1993Jan5.045208.27640@news2.cis.umn.edu> peskin@staff.tc.umn.edu (Yury Peskin) writes:

>As one who plays "Maroczy bind" against Sicilian dragon (via 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 c5 3
>Nf3), it was simple to choose a new defence to the English opening:
>Rubinstein's favourite 1 c4 c5 2 Nc3 Nf6 3 g3 d5 4 cd5 Nd5 5 Bg2 Nc7.  
>
>One game went 6 Nf3 Nc6 7 0-0 e5 8 Ne1 Bd7 9 Nd3 f6 10 b3 Be7 11 Bb2 0-0 12 f4
>ef4 13 Nf4, but this is not to my liking.  Taking inspiration from the game

Watson gives above line, and assesses it as += after 12.f4
He recommends 10.-Bg4 11.Bxc6+ bxc6 12.f3 Bf5 13.Nf2 but assesses it as
"unclear but probably favouring white".

>Here are some questions:
>
>Does anyone have the complete score of the Agdestein-Farago game?  Informator
>#45 only has to move 17.  What was the fate of 8 ... Bf5?
>

Sorry, no information on that game. If you are interested, Bagirov
suggests bizarre looking 8.-h5!? 9.f4 h4 10.d3 hxg3 11.hxg3 c4!? 12.dxc4
Bc5+ 13.e3 Qxd1 14.Nxd1 exf4, with compensation for a pawn.

>What can those who already play this opening tell me?  Obviously White has more
>options here than Black has in the corresponding Sicilian defence position, but
>are the ideas for both sides similar?  Or does the loss of time change too
>much?

I play also Marcozy as white, but my experiences in Rubinstein have been
quite disapponting. The tempo does seem to weight quite a lot in this
position, mainly because of black being behind in development.

>Can anyone recommend IM John Watson's book "Symmetrical English 1 ... c5"?
>Does it contain helpful information on this variation?

Watson considers moves 8.-Be7?, 8.-Bg4?, 8.-Be6?! and 8.-Bd7! but does
indicate any way (apart from above) to black to gain equality. OTH I
have found Watson's books to be good on material but lacking some
accuracy. Good books, if you plan to play English.

Mika
-- 
Mika Kukkonen = Mika.Kukkonen@Helsinki.FI
Trying to learn to live in Helsinki University of Computer Science.
"I am studying, so I am, or am I (studying)?"
From: lim@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu (Lloyd Lim)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: ICCA Journal back issues wanted
Date: 13 Jan 93 04:51:38 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis

Does anyone have back issues of the ICCA Journal that they would be
willing to give away or sell?  If so, please e-mail me.  Thanks.

+++
Lloyd Lim                    Internet: lim@cs.ucdavis.edu
Lim Unlimited                America Online: LimUnltd
330 W. Iris Ave.             AppleLink: LimUnltd
Stockton, CA  95210-3738     CompuServe: 72647,660
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess