HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Michael.P.Colburn@dartmouth.edu (Michael P. Colburn)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Scoring Leaders (was: Re: Benchmark = OJ)
Date: 16 Dec 92 22:42:55 GMT
 <1992Dec16.020519.26992@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>  
 <39Ph03NQc4a600@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a5@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <39Ph03NQc4a600@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>
ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend) writes:

> If Brown
> >had carried the ball 332 times like Simpson did in '73, Brown would
> >have piled up a whopping 2,125 yards in 14 games!  I know this doesn't
> >mean shit, but it's always a good stat to toss out in the heat of an
> >Simpson/Brown agrument...
> 
> You're right it don't mean shit. Juice ran at 6.8 yards a clip in 1975. He was
> league mvp and scored an amazing 23 tds that year! I believe he was the last 
> non-kicker to lead the league in scoring. 

Well, almost...although I'm sure some 49er or Rice has already pointed
out to you that Jerry led all scorers in '87 with 23 TD's and 138
points.  The only other year since '75 (OJ) that a non-kicker took the
scoring title would have been in '82 when Marcus Allen took it with a
lowly (by comparison with other scoring leaders) total of 14 TD's and
84 points.  Interestingly enough, the runner-up to Allen was another
non-kicker, Wendall Tyler of the Rams with 13 TD's and 78 points. 
Also, the runner up to OJ in '75 was Chuck Foreman of Minnesota with 23
TD's, 132 points...not too shabby of a year for Chuck, either!

> >One mark that will be hard to eclipse is Jim Brown's career mark of
> >5.22 yards per carry.
> 
> Agreed.. today's defensive players are too big, too fast and too good. 

Yeah, I'd certainly agree with you here.  Physically, Brown just over
powered the defenders of the early '60's...although he'd still be a
starter today, I would have to argue that, unless today's training
routines made Brown even stronger and quicker than he was in his day,
he'd just be another 'good' back in today's NFL.

And on the subject of scoring, any of you trivia/stat hounds out there
remember who scored (and how many) the most points in a season?  Who
scored the most points in a season with no TD's (how many)? And an easy
one...who is the career leader in points scored (how many)?


Mike Colburn                         =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dartmouth-Hitchcock                  "Pulu-see-ba-goomba" -- Gilligan 
Medical Center                       =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lebanon, New Hampshire  03756        :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: root@june.cmp.rpi.edu (J.R. Ordon)
Subject: Re: Vikings + Gannon = Suck! 
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 19:59:08 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.191238.1424@dracut.keps.com> sue@dracut.keps.com (Sue Klimowicz) writes:
>> 
>I wasn't referring to the coaches but to the owners (administration). They
>have much to do with how the team should be run. The only thing I blamed
>the coaches for is bad play calling and pulling Gannon. 
>
>I personally think Kramer and Wilson are excellent QBs and are proving it
>right now. Gannon, Kramer and Wilson have all had big days while playing
>for the Vikes. But there is something about the Vikes that keep them from
>being another Kelley, Montana ect.  I know the way I wrote the previous
>post it looks like I think the QBs are ruined for good. Sorry. I only
>meant that as a Viking they are not used to their potential and then are
>traded as being ineffective. 
>
>I just noticed that everyone is blaming the QB and saying that getting another
>one will solve the Vikes problem.  I don't believe this. I bet you Young
>would look bad behind the Vikes Offense. Gannon is an excellent QB and if
>he sticks with it he will probably be a bad asset to a NFL team. But I
>think his career with the Vikes is over.
>

I guess you haven't watched Rich Gannon play much!!  The main problems with
Gannon are that he can't throw passes on target to receivers,and he can't
spot the 2nd or 3rd receiver. Steve Young can do both, and if he was the
Vikes QB we'd be talking Super bowl. If you watched the vikes-49ers game
Gannon displayed both of his deficiences, missing a wide-open Anthony
Carter in the end-zone and missing open receivers on key 3rd downs.
Plus he didn't have enough sense to throw the ball away instead of taking
2 sacks in a row to ruin the vikes chance to send the game into overtime.

you're right about one thing, Gannon will be a "bad asset" to a NFL team!!!

----------------------------------
J.R. Ordon
A very nervous Vikes fan
From: vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: THE FOOTBALL GODS HAVE SPOKEN!!!
Date: 16 Dec 92 01:54:43 EST
Distribution: usa
Organization: The Ohio State University, Department of Physics

In article <1992Dec15.212709.641@serval.net.wsu.edu>, jjungbau@thorin.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer) writes:
> In article <1992Dec15.091813.6264@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:
> 
> |> Gary, you're a BIG WEENIE. [etc etc etc...] 
> 
> Yet another intelligent post from John Gloria.  Will this incredibly
> witty dialogue never end?  Man... don't even need to say anything 
> about this guy... his posts speak volumes.  I just feel sorry for
> Packard Bell.

I was under the impression he worked for Pacific Bell. Which is it John?


> 
> Jim
> -- 
> Jim Jungbauer               | Go Vikings, North Stars, Twins, Cougars!
> jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu  | 
> EECS Department             | "Nice move by Bellows... big drive... SCORES!"
> Washington State University |    -- Mike Emrick, 1991 Norris Division Finals

-Garrett



B R O W N S B R O W N S B R O W N S B R O W N S B R O W N S B R O W N S


GO BROWNS!!!	BEAT PITTSBURG AND HOUSTON!!!




Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 00:20:08 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: elambert@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Eber Lambert)
Subject: Re: any Raider fans out there?
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:27:35 GMT


Add one more Raider loyal drivin into dormancy for yet another year.

Comments:

- It aint Jay. They probably would have done better this year with 
  Jay throughout.   

- They can pick up Boomer or Montana or some near ender if they want
  (they wont) but it wont matter until they bring their offense into
  the 90s. They have incredible talent, a good line but probably the 
  most uninnovative playbook in the league. Icing Robiske and elevating
  Walsh to O-coordinator helped alot. They became predictable only 50%
  of the time. There are offenses with far less talent and good 
  coaching doing much better.

- I used to be an Al Davis believer but I think senility is setting in.
  The treatment of Marcus (still their best offensive weapon) is 
  sickening. I'd love to see Marcus play for someone else and accel
  (cant believe I'm saying this). I also expect Marcus to be a 
  coach someday.

_ I'd still LOVE to see em beat SD and Wash in a big way though.

- I'd also like to see Rocket next year. See if Al can swing that....


eel
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.pro:28272 dc.redskins:269
From: grantham@beirut.berkeley.edu (Jon Grantham)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,dc.redskins
Subject: Re: Washington/Dallas Matchup
Date: 12 Dec 1992 20:28:29 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Math. Department.
NNTP-Posting-Host: beirut.berkeley.edu

rich@grebyn.com (Richard Lawrence) wrote:
>In article <1gakkoINNgld@agate.berkeley.edu> grantham@beirut.berkeley.edu (Jon Grantham) writes:
>>rich@grebyn.com (Richard Lawrence) wrote:
>>>If the can't beat Dallas, they don't deserve to be in the playoffs
                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>I disagree with that first statement on the face of it.  Dallas and SF are
...
>If Minnesota looses to SF this weekend (is that game this weekend? never
...
If Minnesota loses, they still *deserve* to be in the playoffs.  They may
show that they don't have that much of a chance of going to the Show, but
they still deserve to be in the playoffs.

>>As for a loss on Sunday implying a loss in the NFC championship game to
>>Dallas, I'll eschew logic and resort to the cliche, "It's hard to beat a
                 ^^^^^^^^^                     ^^^^^^
>>team three times in the same season."
>
>Hmmm. What do you think would have happened if we had played say,
>Atlanta or Detroit for a third time last year? Same thing that happened
>the first two times....

I think  they would have refused to show up.  :-)

Jon
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bitn@quads.uchicago.edu (nathan elery bitner)
Subject: Re: NFL Tiebreakers
Reply-To: bitn@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 23:05:37 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.215304.15817@asl.dl.nec.com> nix@aslslc43.asl.dl.nec.com (David Nix) writes:
>The following is a summary of NFL tie-breaking procedures as printed in the
>Dallas Morning News.  FYI.  Based on that:
>
>AFC Races: 
>o If Miami and Buffalo tie then Miami would win the Division based on best
>  Conference record (8-3 to 8-4 or 7-4 to 7-5).
>o If Buffalo ties Pittsburgh or Miami ties Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh would
>  gain homefield advantage based on best Conference record (the best Miami can
>  do is 8-3, the best Buffalo can do is 8-4, and the worst Pittsburgh can do
>  is 9-3).

Never trust the Morning News.  If Buffalo ties Pittsburgh, head-to-head is
considered first and Buffalo wins.

Nathan

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         INTER ARMA SILENT LEGES                      |
| "Worship Ditka NOW."                email:  bitn@midway.uchicago.edu |
|______________________________________________________________________| 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
Subject: Re: Why do the 49ers get to play by different rules???!!!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 04:38:07 GMT

In article <1ggt8sINN5sm@morrow.stanford.edu> GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullivan) writes:
> [ text deleted  ]

>I still advocate instant replay which wouldn't have helped you
>today, and hiring professional refs, which would have.
>
If you want to win a game, then you have to go for the 
knockout, to take a phrase from boxing. In boxing, often
times the "favorite" is *given* the fight unless he is
knocked out. If the Cowboys or ANY team wants to win, then
they have win by a knockout. That is what the Skins, did,
they delivered a KNOCKOUT in the last seconds of the fight.

This being said, IMHO, Instant Reply SHOULD BE part of
the game, especially in the end zone!! 
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
	"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
  is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 12:50:24 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 10 reasons why the Raiders suck
Date: 18 Dec 92 15:19:14 GMT
Organization: Yale University

In article <1992Dec17.181752.2826@bmerh85.bnr.ca> mjmcgee@bmerh136.bnr.ca (Mark McGee) writes:
>From: mjmcgee@bmerh136.bnr.ca (Mark McGee)
>Subject: 10 reasons why the Raiders suck
>Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 18:17:52 GMT
>Having been a Raider fan for 27 years I have come to the conclusion
>that the Raiders suck big time and no longer warrant my support. I
>consider myself to be a consummate sport fan and so I do not relinquish
>my support lightly ( I'm still a Maple Leaf fan).
>
>The Monday night game against the Dolphins was the worst exhibition
>of football I have ever seen. The disgrace is just too much to bear.
>
>Here are my top 10 list of things the Raiders have to do in order to
>get their team to resemble a sporting franchise.
>
>1.  Move back to Oakland
>2.  Get a new owner
>3.  Get a new head caoch
>4.  Get an intelligent/experienced offensive co-ordinator
>5.  Develop an actual offensive game plan
>6.  Stop employing people with drug problems
>7.  Join the scouting combine
>8.  Stop trading draft picks
>9.  Trade Marcus Allen and let him resume his career
>10. Stop allowing RAP DUDES to use the team emblem
>
>If someone out there can give me any good reason to be a
>Raider fan ( besides Raiderettes ) I 'd like to hear it.
>Help me... I'm considering becoming a Dallas Cowboy Fan!!!!!
>
>
You are right, the Raiders suck, none of the items you list will happen soon.
My advice to you:  (ok turn on the heat, here it comes)

Go with any NFC East team.  They are THE SUPERIOR TEAMS.  PERIOD.

NFC EAST SUPERIORITY! YES   :-)  :-)  Its true, just ask any Cowboys/Eagles/
Skins/or Giants fans.  (Lets not get rediculous and mention the Cards)  
Flame me, I'm in the mood!  :-)  Flame resistant clothes on today, chaps!
Hahahahahah

 (5 Teams,1 taking the div, 2 are looking 
for playoff spots) The Cowboys will be a good pick since they will be 
wreaking havoc in the next few years.  Of course if this was a few years 
ago, I might have tried to persuade you to be a Giants fan.  But we are all 
in group therapy now, so its not the best time.  

Satish, pass the valium!
Adriene
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: marshall@NEBULA.SSD.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM (Bob Marshall)
Subject: Re: another joke
Reply-To: marshall@NEBULA.SSD.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 01:11:59 GMT

My favorite football joke goes like this (I first heard it several years
ago; it's not really appropriate at present) :

A man was at a Cowboys preseason game. There was a man sitting in front of
him with a monkey on his lap. Early in the game the Cowboys scored a quick
touchdown, and the monkey clapped vigorously. On the ensuing defensive
stand, the Cowboys intercepted a pass and returned it for a TD. At this,
the monkey stood up and did a flip. The man took notice, but did not say
anything. Later, the Cowboys forced a punt, and the kick was returned all
the way for another TD. And the monkey stood up and saluted, then sang
"The Eyes of Texas Are Upon You". This was too much for the man watching
the monkey. So he asked the man sitting in front of him "That's amazing, 
but this is just a meaningless preseason game. What does the monkey do when 
the Cowboys win a really big game?". And the monkey's owner replied "I don't
know, I've only had him for ten years".

BA-DA-BOOM!!

=============================================================================
Bob Marshall                     \\     "Women aren't as smart as they
Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.     \\     think they are; they think we
Sunnyvale, CA                      \\    men know a lot more than we
marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com\\   really do."
"I tell the truth 'cept when I lie"  \\     - Tim the Toolman
=============================================================================
From: johnbr@master.CNA.TEK.COM (John Breeden )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Call against the Vikes
Date: 14 Dec 92 19:05:06 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.

In article <101891@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
>
>During he 49ers/Vikes games as Terry Allen was rushing for a possible first 
>down, he was stopped short and a 9ers defensive lineman grabbed him by the
>legs and lifted him up.  Flags flew.  The foul was against ... Terry Allen??
>
>Did anyone else see this?  Did Allen do anything that warranted a foul??
>
>satish nair

During one of the replays, I saw Allen mule-kick the 49er defender (Tim 
Harris?).  The referee reached for his flag at approximately the same moment.

It was a pretty cheap call, as Allen was really only pissed off that his legs
were being held up.  He did not kick *that* hard.

Just another whining 49er fan,

John Breeden
(johnbr@master.cna.tek.com) 


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: stamber@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Kevin L. Stamber)
Subject: Re: Questions for Steeler Fans
Summary: sort of from Pittsburgh
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 17:33:37 GMT

In article <1gq2ljINNohh@spool.mu.edu>, wayne@waynes.frontiertech.com writes:
> Can Bubby Brister bounce back from last week?

     Bubby can't get much worse.  He _will_ be playing at home, so there
is some hope, but I for one am not overly optimistic.  I feel that I can
respond to this questionnaire since I have kept careful track and I will be
returning to Pittsburgh this weekend.

> Will Neil O' Donnell be back for the playoffs?

     One can only hope so.  Neil's injury would typically keep a player out
for quite a while, but I think that the Steelers new conditioning program
instituted by Cowher may be contributing to quick turnaround times (excuse
me for using Engineering lingo, but I just finished a BEAR of an exam.)

> What is the attitude around Pittsburgh this week?

     My family said a novena for the recovery of O'Donnell and a second
wind for BARRY!

> Will they be ready for the Vikings?

     Last week's loss to da bears was more a breakdown of special teams,
similar to the one earlier this season at Lambeau (Woodson's muff, breakdown
of pass coverage, etc.)  Cowher seldom lets these things slip for more than
one game and tends to produce an output of great ability by his team in the 
subsequent games.  This, combined with the fact that Sean Salisbury Steak
will start at QB for les Vikes should give Packer fans some solace; QB becomes
a tossup, defenses are both strong -- errors and standout plays will be the
difference.
> 
> 
> A hopeful Packers fan
> 

Kevin Stamber
Purdue University

COWHER POWER!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 03:20:07 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)