HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 19:12:09 -0800
From:         Harry S Wahrer <wahrer@CS.UNR.EDU>
Subject:      Re: MS Access database

On Mon, 16 Nov 1992, Michael Gordon wrote:

> >
> >STOP THE PRESSES!
> >I just got some mail from MicroSoft.  They have released MS Access for
> >$130 (Can., $100 US).  It has Wizards (very helpful in Excel and Money)
> >and can handle graphics (including video).  I am growing very old waiting
> >for Borland to get off its bloated duff and come up with a windows
> >version of Paradox, I think I'll take them up on the offer.  Anyone
> >out there know more information?
> >Louis
>
> I can add a couple of things:
>         1) Microsoft opened today a forum on Compuserve devoted to ACCESS; the
> name--oddly enough--is MSACCESS
>         2) I just received, also today, the typical Microsoft glossy brochure
> on ACCESS (earlier inquiries had resulted in unreadable--and long--faxes). If
> anyone want to order the glossy, the part # is 098-33027
>         3) Microsoft is also taking order for--but not yet shipping, I
> think--demo disks for ACCESS. Be insistent if you call for one, one out of
> three operators insists that there is no such product.
>
> Michael D. Gordon
> gordonM@cc.denison.edu
> Date sent:  16-NOV-1992 17:20:29

I can add that I called MS today and ordered the product. It is shipping
on 25 November. Cost U.S. $115.00 shipped Federal Express. To order at
this price (suggested retail goes to $695.00 on January 31, 1993) call
800-642-7676 ask for extension QF2.......
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:        UK.AC.EHCHE.MARVIN; 18 NOV 92  9:01:17 GMT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 09:01:25 GMT
From:         Mark Oakley <oakleym@MARVIN.EHCHE.AC.UK>
Subject:      DeskJet 500C Driver for Win 3.1

Has anybody experienced problems with this driver (either version 2.1 or 3)?
When trying to do a Colour printout, the printer sometimes flashes the user to
change the print cartridge. Printing the same file with the same driver on a
different machine works fine. Could this be a disc space problem? Any ideas?

TIA

From: Mark Oakley, Computer Unit, Edge Hill College of Higher Education,
      St. Helens Road, Ormskirk, Lancashire  L39  4QP
Tel:  +44 695 575171  Ext. 4354/4300     DDI:  +44 695 584354
Fax:  +44 695 579997

JANET:                   oakleym@uk.ac.ehche.marvin
Internet/EARN/BITNET:    oakleym@marvin.ehche.ac.uk
UUCP:                    oakley.m%marvin.ehche.ac.uk@uknet.uucp
Telecom Gold:            10124:isl10267
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:04:48 CST
From:         Michael Garrison <C97801MG@WUVMD.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Help! Windows locks up on Network...
              19 Nov 1992 17:10:11 GMT from <roysan@UXB.LIV.AC.UK>

I installed Windows for WorkGroups last night.  First I installed the
software (windows worked fine)  then I installed the Network card.
Windows hung after the display.
Well, the problem was I did not connected the Terminal end connector
on the network card.  When I put this on, (which i guess closed the
token ring) it worked just fine.
Mike Garrison
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"win3-l@uicvm"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:46:00 MET
Comments:     This mail was sent from cluster RUUCLA using PMDF V3.0
From:         Anneke Sicherer-Roetman <ANNEKE@HUTRUU54.BITNET>
Subject:      printing from a windows program

Could anyone direct me to a book, or a free/shareware/commercial product
to help me with printing from a windows program I am currently developing.
I have absolutely no idea what to do. I need to print text as well as graphics.
Thanks for any info! Anneke Sicherer-Roetman, Utrecht University, Netherlands
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 08:28:18 CST
From:         Gary Jarrell <C604441@MIZZOU1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: ** VISUAL BASIC QUESTION **

I do not know if VB will support a routine from Assemblyor not.
If it does, then your problem is solved.  Do your encryption routine in
Assembly and you are done.  Gary J.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sun, 22 Nov 1992 15:37:44 -0700
From:         Mike Lieberman <cwmliebe@ANTELOPE.WCC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Windows NT

On Sun, 22 Nov 1992, (Arron S. King) wrote:

>  article I read said that NT would run on a 386sx.  Mine is such a processor,
 I
>  have a 170 mb hard drive, and 10 megs memory.  My question is " Will NT run
 at
>  a halfway
> decent pace on my machine?  or will it just sit there and thrash like OS/2
 did.

I !know! I wil likely get static on this but -- I have run the NT beta on
386 systems and find it incredibly slow.  IF you have a 33MHz 386sx, and
you're willing to wait a more than a little it might be ok but on anything
else in the 386sx line, forget it.

**********************************************************************
* Michael Lieberman              Internet: cwmliebe@antelope.wcc.edu *
*                                Voice Phone: 307-856-9096           *
* Don't crush that dwarf,        Direct Data Line: 307-856-3601      *
* hand me the pliers.      Snail:418 Westchester, Riverton, WY  82501*
**********************************************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 14:01:00 EST
From:         "STEVEN M. TENHOOR" <88199@TAYLORU.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Writer's Toolkits v2.01 4sale

Windows List.
NOT A SALES LIST!
Steven M. TenHoor
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 08:56:09 CET
From:         Espen Haakonsen <FGL92016@NOBIVM.BITNET>
Subject:      No WINDOWS NT for us ||||||||

HI all,

I agree with Jrn as he claims Windows NT not to be the future operating
system for common Intel end-users. The program code has grown to big for
Intel processors to run at a desent speed. I witnessed the rise and fall
a 33 MHZ 486 with 16 megs of ram running Windows NT. I must admit that my
excpectations were great booting the machine. Thus were the sorrows even
greater as I experienced a rather slow system. Personally this let the air
out of my NT-fanatsies. I belive in Windows to be the operating system of
the future, next to (or below?) OS2. Not Windows NT but Windows 3.2 , 3.3,
3.4, and so on.

Our claims (Jrn Morten and me) are in many ways supported by chief of pro-
ductions in the Windows for Workgroups-project, as he says:
"Windows for Workgroups wil be the leading operating system for PC's in the
yers to come, while NT is ment for RISC-machines and Intel Multiprocessor-
servers."

Broken promises ?     Well, that's up for you to decide.


Espen H}konsen
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 14:05:00 EST
From:         "JFT@NCCIBM1.BITNET" <JFT@NCCIBM1.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Stealth compatible monitors?

Hi Michael,

  What is the maximum resolution that a NEC 3D is capable of?

  Anybody know?

  Thanks,

John.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%"win3-l@uicvm.bitnet"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 19:29:00 EST
From:         5979A8@GMUVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Diamond VGA drivers

Question to all you VGA gurus...

I'm a little confused concerning Diamond's VGA cards. I always thought the
Stealth card was the fastest Windows accelerator card that Diamond makes. Now
I hear there is a Speedstar 24 and 24x out. I guess 24 means 24 bit, but at
what resolution? How fast are they compared to the Stealth. Why are they cheaper
?

Bernd
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA
From: majland@nork.auc.dk (Anders Majland Pedersen)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: QVTNE303.ZIP -- has anyone printed the readme.wri file?
Date: 17 Nov 92 18:23:49 GMT
	<1992Nov16.160203.22786@tamsun.tamu.edu>
Organization: Aalborg University (AUC)

In article <1992Nov16.160203.22786@tamsun.tamu.edu> pmh2962@tamsun.tamu.edu (Pat Hayes) writes:

   Howdy!
	   A quickie -- I'm having problems read/writing the readme.wri
   file in the qvt*.zip file.  No matter what reader I use (write, word, etc)
   the file comes up one v-e-r-y long single-character-per-line document!
   I tried resetting the page format, deleting some hard returns -- nothing
   seems to work.  I can get notepad to look at it as an ascii file,
   but my printer goes crazy trying to interpret the 'write' code symbols.
	   The same thing happened with the v2.8 readme also. Thanks!

When this hapens to me, its most often because of the end of line
characters is ^M or some other unix control-symbol;

Hvae you been transfering the *.wri as ascii FTP ?

mvh Majland@aud.auc.dk 
--
   Anders Majland Pedersen              E-mail  majland@aud.auc.dk
                                                majland@nork.auc.dk
                                                d502i@kom.auc.dk
   Aalborg University                   S-mail  Anders Majland Pedersen
   Institute for Electronic Systems             Sigrid Undsets Vej 254B
   Gr. D502I B1-205                             DK-9220 Aalborg O
   Fredrik Bajers Vej 7                         Denmark
   DK-9220 Aalborg O                    FTP     192.38.54.8
   Denmark                              Phone   +45 98 15 24 43
From: DEVRIES@NAUVAX.BITNET (Ernie DeVries)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: MS Access
Date: 17 Nov 92 21:16:13 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: win3-l@uicvm.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"win3-l@uicvm.bitnet"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

MS Access looks like a fine product, but I doubt that one could ever say that
it is better or worse than Paradox for Windows - just different.  One thing
for sure, as a Borland user, I'll wait for PdoxWin.  Its features and its
integration with Quattro Pro for Windows make that an easy choice for me.  In
addition, it has been my experience that Borland really does ship products
only "when they are ready".  This is not an experience I've had with Microsoft
products.  I'll wait for PdoxWin, because when it gets here I'll get a solid
product that will do what I need.  Borland, of course, isn't saying when it
will ship, but my personal expectation is that it will be just about the same
time that Access goes out.
+========================================================+
|     /\                   Ernie DeVries                 |
|    /  \/\      Academic/Personal Computer Services     |
| /\/    \ \/\       DeVries@nauvax.ucc.nau.edu          |
|   Northern Arizona University   "The Mountain Campus"  |
+========================================================+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 11:48:00 CST
From:         $LPAHM0@LUCCPUA.BITNET
Subject:      Windows vs. OS/2

I remember that I saw someone discussed issue about windows vs. os/2.
I missed the result part. Could someone tell me what is relative common
opinion about this issue? EX. one of them can do such and such and the
other can't.

Thanks
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: win3-l@uicvm.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"win3-l@uicvm.bitnet"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 00:48:16 -0500
From:         DEBRA GABBARD <STUGBBRD@EKU.BITNET>
Subject:      Drivers

A few weeks ago someone requested a driver for an IBM Quietwriter II for
Windows.   The only solution that I have found that seems to give any
results at all is the Generic Text driver.  What I would like to find
is a 3rd party vendor or independent developer that may have written
a driver that would work with the graphics capabilities.   Someone
posted a list of some companies that they thought did this but I
accidently deleted the message.  If anyone having information on
other drivers that may work (the QWII does not emulate any other printer)
or the name of an independent driver developer, could you please sent
the information to me.   Thanks.
                        Debra Gabbard
                        Stugbbrd@eku.bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:41:00 EDT
From:         JONES@EVMSVMS.BITNET
Subject:      RE: new features for dos 6?

I have heard that defragmentation, virus scanning, and maybe security are
among the new features of DOS 6!

Walter Jones
Eastern Virginia Medical School
jones
jones@evmsvms.bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sun, 15 Nov 1992 15:12:12 -0700
From:         Mike Lieberman <cwmliebe@ANTELOPE.WCC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: The Next Version of Windows for DOS

On Sun, 15 Nov 1992 BARKER%GONZAGA.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU wrote:

> I would disagree.  DOS apps and Windows apps now co-exist in Win 3.1 for
> DOS.  I realize these programs are all 16-bit but the analogy holds
> because both categories of software are as vastly different as 16 and 32 bit
> programs and programming.

The question boils down to just how many MS environments are programmers
going to be able to support.  The reality is that now you have DOS
software and you have Windows software.  What you are suggesting is that
the market will support 1. DOS software, 2. 16-bit WIndows software, 3.
32-bit Windows software.  Each and every programmer who was intending to
support the high end WIndows customer would then have to have two products
for the Windows market, with the 32-bit one supporting features the 16-bit
one couldn't handle.  Maybe, but I don't think so - it goes against every
law of marketing I know of.

> I have never heard any rumor or hint from any Microsoft source (and I have
> a friend on the Windows development team) to indicate there will be two
> flavors of NT.  Where did you come by this info?

Well they've said it many times so I don't understand your suprise. They
will have a server version supporting multi domain addressing and a
high-end workstation version capable of peer to peer file sharing. It's
all in the release DOCs and no secret.  They have also indicated that
there will be different prices for the two versions, also no big secret.

> What kind of work (beyond a button bar) do you think FM needs --that is
> for the average user (excluding stuff like a better editor for
> programmers)?
>
> Don Barker

Nothing for now.  I just suspect that the issues that the button bar
resolves will be incorporarted in all future releases.  Of course you may
see a event monitor or a performance monitor or a disk manager, ala NT, in
the newer DOS based Windows products.  Hard to say right now.

**********************************************************************
* Michael Lieberman              Internet: cwmliebe@antelope.wcc.edu *
*                                Voice Phone: 307-856-9096           *
* Don't crush that dwarf,        Direct Data Line: 307-856-3601      *
* hand me the pliers.      Snail:418 Westchester, Riverton, WY  82501*
**********************************************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 07:30:34 CST
From:         "Mr. Wayne O Estep" <westep@STL-07SIMA.ARMY.MIL>
Subject: Re: Help! Windows locks up on Network...

Mike,
  It's not much of an answer but...

  I have to run STANDARD mode and all works fine.  If I even think
  enhanced mode the system will lock at the 3.1 Logo.

  Alot has to do with the drivers, making sure all versions are in sync.
  Unfortunately since I am able to perform my duties in standard mode, I
  am not authorized to research and resolve my problem.

  Oh ya, I have a similar environment.

  Give it a try.

WayneO.

**************************************************************************
*  Wayne O. Estep                Internet: westep@st-louis-emh2.army.mil *
*  Senior Consultant                       192.35.148.7/150.211.40.9     *
**************************************************************************
>
>Hello, all.  Whenever I login my network, then run Windows (3.1), the
>Windows logo appears, but then the computer locks up...hard.  Any
>suggestions.  I think it may be something to do with memory
>conflicts, but I am by no means a memory expert...  Thank you.
>
>Here's information about my system:
>-386DX/40, 4 meg RAM, 130 meg HD (240 stacked)
>-Token Ring network, running Novell netware v. 3.26
>-Windows 3.1
>-SVGA 800x600
>
>Any comments or suggestions would be greatly appereciated.
>-Mike

>    +-------------------------------------------------+
>    |  M I K E   B I T Z                              | \
>    |                                                 |  |
>    |  <<<Internet:  BITZM@COLUMBIA.DSU.EDU>>>        |  |
>    +-------------------------------------------------+  |
>     \__________________________________________________\
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:10:24 EST
From:         George Keith <ST202064@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      PD software

Does anybody out there know of any good places to get PD software for Windows
3.1?  All the software for Windows out there is for 3.0.  Not that this is such
 a problem (since most of it is compatible), but I was just looking for some go
od programs out there that support windows 3.1...

Thanx in advance...

--george Keith
George_Keith@Brown.edu
ST202064@brownvm
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:11:24 EST
From:         "Roy L. Lehmann" <ROY@NKI.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: .ZIP files on WUARCHIVE
              19 Nov 1992 20:10:04 -0500 from <dudleyd@HAMLET.UNCG.EDU>

On Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:10:04 -0500 David S. Dudley Jr. said:
>
>I have a copy of PKZIP 1.93A and it works GREAT!  I have had no problems
>so far with compressing or unzipping and the program is much faster than
>1.10 and also gives options for extra compression for smaller/tighter
                                 -------------------------------------
>files
>
>Get it today!
>
Everyone who uses PKZIP 1.93a should be aware that files created with these
options cannot be unzipped by PKUNZIP 1.10.


Roy L. Lehmann - Systems Programmer
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
ROY@NKI.BITNET -- VOICE MAIL: 914 365-2000 ext 1768
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 11:07:00 PDT
From:         BARKER@GONZAGA.BITNET
Subject:      Re: WP FOR WIN

On Fri, 20 Nov 1992 PATH5@TIFTON.BITNET wrote:

>WHEN I TRY TO PRINT A 50 PAGE DOCUMENT (LJIII W/1MEG) USING THE WINDOWS
>PRINTER DRIVER AND PRINT MANAGER, PRINTING STOPS AFTER 26 PAGES AND THE
>PRINTER GIVES AN OUT OF MEMORY ERROR.  IF I USE THE WP DRIVERS EVERYTHING
>PRINTS.  DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM IS AND IS THERE ANYWAY AROUND IT?
>I PREFER TO USE THE WIN DRIVER.

I have had similar problems with WPWIN and Windows print drivers on a
Novell network.  (I've also encountered my share of print problems with
1-2-3 for Windows and printing too!)  After many unfruitful calls to WP, I
finally gave up and used the DOS drivers.  My understanding, however, is
that WPWIN 5.2 will ship with facilities that give WP print drivers access
to TrueType.  Perhaps the support for Windows print drivers will be
improved too.  Sorry I can't move of more help.

|======================================================|
| Don Barker                             ________      |
| Gonzaga University                    |        |\    |
| Computer Assisted Learning Center     |  CALC  | \   |
| INTERNET: BARKER@GONZAGA.EDU          |        |  \  |
| BITNET: BARKER@GONZAGA                 -------- \  \ |
|======================================================|
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:06:35 G+3
From:         CCG3003@SAKAAU03.BITNET
Subject:      Re: DesqJet 550C

>>>
>>>related to the discussion Inkjet x Laser, has anybody seen or is
>>>using the DeskJet 550C ? Besides allowing simultaneous colour and
>>>black printout, has anything else changed? What about Win31
>>>compatibility (=drivers)?
>> If you get an info please forward it to me as I have a new HP DESKJET 500c
>> (One Month)  and didn't even here about the deskjet 550C  before Today
>>
>> TagMaster
>
>I own both a 500C and a 550C.  I love the 550C, not having to change cartridges
>is a major bonus.  Furthermore, composite black is a poor substitute for true
>black.  The overall internal design is better, it feeds paper more effectively,
>and it has a better envelope interface (albeit, there are printers available
>which do a far superior job of addressing envelopes than the 500C or 550C).
>
>On the other hand, the best price you can pick up a 550C for is about $700,
>whereas  the 500C (which is being unloaded) can be purchased for less than
>$400 bones!
>
>If you enjoy your 500C stick with it, if you are a bit of a gadget freak you'll
>want the 550C.  Good luck!
>
>Jeff Allen.
>Santa Clara University
Hi Jeff

thanks for the Info  I'm not sure.the subject of composite black and color is
the most problem of all  (if you want to write a letter with a fancy letter
head that is a real problem) . But my Deskjet is pratically new  I think
I will stay with it for a while ..
but do you have an updated version of the drivers  I have version 2.1
what version comes with the deskjet 550C
THANKS     ..)(amed
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 09:54:03 EST
From:         "(Joseph T. Malloy)" <jmalloy@ITSMAIL1.HAMILTON.EDU>
Subject:      Re: ATM FOnts and Windows
              "CMCGREW@UCSVAX.UCS.UMASS.EDU" at Nov 18, 92 9:22 am

>
> I know a lot of people don't like OS/2 (at least on this list they don't	seem
>  to); but, it includes an Adobe Type Manager for both Windows and
> OS/2.  If you are thinking of getting it anyway, it only costs $99 and
> you would spend close to that on ATM by itself.  The new service packs
> from IBM support True Type for Windows too.
>
> There are a number of commercial products on the market that will convert
> between TT, ATM and several other formats.  They vary in price from $99
> to about $300.
>
Whaddaya mean we don't like OS/2?  We can't stand it!! (Just kidding,
it's a great DOS multi-tasker, thoug I did go back to Windows 3.1 after
a few weeks of OS/2...)

Having used Adobe Type Manager 1.1, 1.15, and 2.0 with Windows 3.0 and
3.1, I can say that it was perfectly compatible with everything I used
but that I finally deleted it in favor of sticking with True Type fonts
in Windows 3.1 (not yet supported by OS/2).  While I understand there
may be some technical reasons for sticking with ATM Type 1 postscript
fonts, they were moot points for me. Especially for 300 dpi laser
printer output, no one I know could tell the difference between Adobe
and True Type; TT was faster on the screen and in printing; there are
simply more TT fonts out there at lower cost (quantity/cost linked here,
I'm not talking about absolute numbers of fonts available) and they're
just fine, IMHO.

Joe
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: win3-l%uicvm.BITNET@WUVMD.WUSTL.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"win3-l@uicvm.bitnet"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:06:00 CST
From:         SORENSD@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU
Subject:      OCR Software for Windows

What are some good OCR software packages for windows that will read FAXes?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU