HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mwithers@pb.serum.kodak.com (Mark Witherspoon (x37360))
Subject: Need Military BBS!!
Followup-To: mwithers@serum.kodak.com
Organization: Clinical Products Division, Eastman Kodak Company
Distribution: usa, USA
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 13:07:41 GMT

Help!!.  I am looking to to research on WWII south pacific battles,
etc. so I have been suggested that I contact these groups to see
if a BBs exists.  If any boards are around please drop me a E-mail
to my reply to address or post on the net.

Thanks

Mark Witherspoon (mwithers@serum.kodak.com)


-- 
##############################################################################
Sent by: Mark Witherspoon            # The opinions expressed here are of my #
Reply to: mwithers@serum.kodak.com   # own, not of my employer...            #
##############################################################################
From: crosenberg@igc.apc.org (Charlie Rosenberg)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: TEAMate BBS software?
Date: 15 Nov 92 20:36:00 GMT
Nf-ID: #N:cdp:1297400069:000:67
Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!crosenberg    Nov 15 12:36:00 1992



I am looking for information about the TEAMate unix BBS product.
Organization: Sophomore, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:18:04 -0500 
From: David Reeve Sward <sward+@CMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware

Excerpts from netnews.alt.bbs: 17-Nov-92 Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware by
dawson@willard.UUCP 
> > Magpie
> > Pirate's BBS
> > XBBS
> > ix/Mbox
> > unidel
> > Waffle
> > 
> > Well, those are the 6 UNIX BBS programs I know. Is that many?
>  
> It's a start!  This is something that could be built into a FAQ sheet..
> it may already be in one.. but since I (bad boy!) didn't look for it,
> I don't know about it.

There's also yabbs - being developed by Alex Wetmore - aw2t+@andrew.cmu.edu
From: Mossad@qube.OCUnix.On.Ca (Mossad)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Prodigy in Canada?
Distribution: world
Date: 21 Nov 92 23:11:05 EDT
Organization: The QuBE BBS

About a year ago, I looked into whether the Prodigy system was available in
Canada and was told no.  I was wondering if that has changed since then. 
If so, how can I contact them to get the local dail-up number for Ottawa as
well as the software?  Thanks...

     Steve

-- Via DLG Pro v0.992

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Fidonet:  1:163/282     |     UUCP:  aa229@freenet.carleton.ca         |
|          1:163/109.18  |            Mossad@qube.ocunix.on.ca          |
|  <<My opinions are not associated with anything, including my head.>  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: peter@global.hacktic.nl (Peter Busser)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 13:00:54 GMT
Organization: Global Village 1

cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise) writes:

>you said, it runs well even on an AT.  Heck, even the 4 mhZ XT that
>one node had this summer was at least bearable...certainly better than
>other BBSes I've seen run under DESQview.

A 4.77MHz XT? Nice! But why should anyone run DV on an XT with one node?
Furthermore, did those AT's have smart boards or just dumb 8250/16450 serial
chips?
From: bjkramer@remus.rutgers.edu (Brian Kramer)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: New Net Idea
Date: 22 Nov 92 22:41:09 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

I have an idea for a new BBS network and would like to get some feedback.  The
Net would be called SupportNet.  I would approach shareware and commercial
companies.  Those willing would each have their own support conference.  The
goal of the network would be to make support easily accesible (no
tech support lines where you have to wait an hour while calling long distance).
The net would also distribute the shareware files and other appropriate files.
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: mfrwq@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Robert W. Quesal)
Subject: Daytona Beach bbs?
Organization: Educational Computing Network
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 22:22:07 GMT

My dad, living in Daytona Beach, FL, has an Amiga with modem. I'd like
to see if I could get him interested in using it, and perhaps ultimately
being able to send/receive email.  I'd be ineterested in any bbs in the
Daytona Beach area.

Respond directly to me, please.

Thanks!

Bob Q.

-- 
Robert W. Quesal, Ph.D.           mfrwq@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu 
Western Ill. U.                   mfrwq@ecnuxa.bitnet
                                  R-Quesal@bgu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: neta@iat.holonet.net (Gregory Giagnocavo)
Subject: FidoNet Nodelist
Organization: HoloNet (BBS: 510-704-1058)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 10:20:21 GMT

Common problem is tht while there are thousands of FidoNet boards the
world over, there isn't an easy way to find the one in your backyard. 
To the person who asked about a California number for Fido, well, you can
start by calling the regional coordinator for California/Nevada at (714)
838 6539. Usually you canlogon and see the FidoNode list. Then look for
theone near est to you.

We publish the NetPower Resource Guide to Online Services
460 pages, free diskette, and a free one month account on Internet
(e-mail)
$35.00 including shipping charges.
National Education & Technology Alliance
Box 6051
Lancaster PA 17603
Orderlline only 800-457-9112
Fax 717 898 9837
Internet mail:  neta@holonet.net
Mastercard Visa and purchase orders accepted.
From: demosys@gcomm.com (Galacticomm's Demo System)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 18:21:52 EDT
Organization: Galacticomm, Inc.




-M>From article <Bxxnvp.ByE@gator.rn.com>, by larry@gator.rn.com (Larry
-M>>
-M>> Someone just mentioned that RA supports multiple lines on one machi
-M>> without requiring a multitasker.  Also, Glatacom supports 64 lines
-M>> a single DOS machine --
-M>>

-M>	RA most definetly needs a multi-tasker such as DV to operate.

-M>	Galacticom can support 64 lines.  So can TBBS.  Neither
-M>can run external programs while the system is online.

Actually, Galacticomm can support up to 256 users off of a single PC if
you use X.25 or Novell LAN connections....  You are correct, you can not
run DOS programs on the same computer.... There are a number of Add-On
Options both from Galacticomm, and various TPD's that give a whole sh!t
load of features to The Major BBS, and integrate themselves into the BBS
enviroment.  Galacticomm does have a Dial-Out Option if you still wanted
to run your DOS programs... it would just have to be done on another
computer....via a NULL modem cable between the BBS and the other PC...

Christopher L. Kotacka
==========================================================================
 chrisk@gcomm.com  | My words are not fabricated and represent only me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>Email should include the following on
>>the first line of message text>>   MBBS: Arch
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

=====================================================================
|      Galacticomm's Demo System running The Major BBS Version 6    |
=====================================================================

Xref: sparky alt.bbs:7135 comp.sys.amiga.marketplace:9095 comp.sys.next.marketplace:1266 comp.sys.mac.wanted:10886 comp.sys.sun.wanted:1831
From: dise@decoy.uoregon.edu (David Casti)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.sys.amiga.marketplace,comp.sys.next.marketplace,comp.sys.mac.wanted,comp.sys.sun.wanted
Subject: Looking for modems
Date: 22 Nov 92 19:17:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: nntp.1992Nov22.191755.26781
Reply-To: dise@oregon.uoregon.edu
Organization: University of Oregon Network Services

Hi,

I'm looking for some cheap 2400 baud modems to give away to friends.  I don't  
want anything fancy; I'm not interested in V.32 or MNP or any of that.  I  
don't want fax modems particularly.  I just want plain, old external 2400 baud  
modems.

I would prefer to buy used modems from someone who is stepping up from a 2400  
to 9600 or 14.4K modem and would like to liquidate their 2400.

Please email me to cut down on group traffic.  I will forward all responses I  
receive to anyone who asks.

Thanks,
David.
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: bbs wanted
From: pilcher_p@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Date: 23 Nov 1992 04:49:53 GMT
Reply-To: pilcher_p@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Organization: Wellington City Council (Public Access), Wgtn, Nz
NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

At present we are running a multi line bbs in wellington new zealand. 
however we are looking to in the near future, to network to auckland
which we believe will benifit both bbs's that become involved.
The bbs software that we are currently using will allow resource sharing 
between both BBS's such as files, mail, and chatting.
if anyone from auckland is interested in upgrading to our software, or
in starting a bbs, and would like to consider networking, please 
contact me on

PILCHER_P@KOSMOS.WCC>GOVT.NZ

cheers

pat
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: adamg@eff.org (Adam Gaffin)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Originator: adamg@eff.org
Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 02:46:09 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.184131.60943@cc.usu.edu> sl9dm@cc.usu.edu writes:
>
>
>Sorta, but for one thing, TBBS is *NOT* Desqview capible. This I hear from my
>old boss, who hear from AUTHOR! for Another, TBBS has a limit of 64
>message/file areas I belive the count is. and cann't go above 62,000 messages
>TOTAL.   IMHO It's best to stick with RA!
>

Say, you don't know Larry Snyder, do you?  TBBS now supports an unlimited
number of conferences/messages (the exact number is subject only to the
size of your computer's memory). Not being Desqview capable is an
advantage IMHO, because you don't need all sorts of extra memory to run a
multi-line TBBS system -- it has the "multi-tasking" built in. 

>I've had experience, and IMHO, TBBS SUCKS!

To each his own, I guess. I've set up both TBBS and RA systems and like
TBBS more.  But what I really like is the support -- it's a professional
product and help is just a phone call away.


-- 
Adam Gaffin
adamg@eff.org     Voice: (508) 626-3968
Putting the Internet on paper!
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Originator: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu
Organization: University of Vermont -- Division of EMBA Computer Facility
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 21:13:25 GMT

From article <1992Nov17.184131.60943@cc.usu.edu>, by sl9dm@cc.usu.edu:
> Sorta, but for one thing, TBBS is *NOT* Desqview capible. This I hear from my
> old boss, who hear from AUTHOR! for Another, TBBS has a limit of 64
> message/file areas I belive the count is. and cann't go above 62,000 messages
> TOTAL.   IMHO It's best to stick with RA!


	TBBS is DESQview compatable.  It's not recommended or supported by
the eSoft, of course, but it will run under DESQview.  Of course
TBBS has it's own multi-tasker.  There's no reason to use DESQview unless
you want to hog your machine *grin*

	As for the message base, it is limited to 65,555 messages, but
the message base limit (bases) is essentially unlimited.

 TTYL
 Chris

Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.bbs.misc
From: chambles@whale.st.usm.edu (John William Chambless)
Subject: San Antonio BBSes
Originator: chambles@whale.st.usm.edu
Organization: University of Southern Mississippi
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 04:11:42 GMT


Does anyone know of any good BBSes in the San Antonio, TX area?
Thanks!
-- 
* Billy Chambless   University of Southern Mississippi, USA 
*   chambles@whale.st.usm.edu
*    
*   Programming exclusively in (--(C++))
From: demosys@gcomm.com (Galacticomm's Demo System)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: There
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 18:21:49 EDT
Organization: Galacticomm, Inc.




-M>From article <gate.ckgiuB1w165w@tpw.UUCP>, by Party@tpw:

<Minor stuff deleted>

-M>>> Does anyone out there know of a bbs that has this capability and
-M>>> compatibility??? (I'm using a lantastic network, by the way...).
-M>>> for any info at all!
-M>>> Tom Plant
-M>>> tplant@igc.org

-M>	According to the brochures for MajorBBS 6.0, it's supposed
-M>to support MHS gateways.  Anyone know if this is true?

Quite True!  In fact, I'm posting this message from Galacticomm's Demo
System, and it does Internet Mail, and News via MHS  :>

(I'm also the one who's writing it @ gcomm)

Seriously, Version 6 does have MHS support built into the Baseline
Package (2-User for $259)

Give us a call @ 1-800-328-1128

Christopher L. Kotacka

=======================================================================
chrisk@gcomm.com  | My opinions are fabricated by noone else!
=======================================================================

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>Email should include the following on
>>the first line of message text>>   MBBS: Arch
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

=====================================================================
|      Galacticomm's Demo System running The Major BBS Version 6    |
=====================================================================

Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: klaus@cscns.com (Klaus Dimmler)
Subject: Re: Need Multiline Multichat BBS
Organization: Community_News_Service
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 14:11:13 GMT

There already are systems where people all over the world chat real-time
over the Internet: It is called irc. Just get yourself a UNIX system,
connect yourself to the internet, get the irc host shareware, and you'll
be set!
From: peter@global.hacktic.nl (Peter Busser)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: UNIX BBSystems, any more? (was: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 11:54:53 GMT
Organization: Global Village 1

alan@admiral.uucp (Brad Alan) writes:

>There is also Citadel/UX, a very nice Citadel port to UNIX.  I am sure
>it is just like unidel.

Can you tell me more details about Citadel/UX? The dox of unidel say that it
is ported from the ST Citadel, so unidel (probably) *is* Citadel...

Are there more UNIX BBS systems? Is there a FAQ list? If there isn't, then I'll
create one. (Er, it would be in fact a UNIX BBS FEM list, or Frequently
Encountered Misconceptions. :)

Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: elisha@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Elisha Landman)
Subject: Duke address
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 05:34:32 GMT

Does anyone know the address at Duke University? I am trying to find
it so I can write my friend at Duke Law a letter.. thanks, Elisha

Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: tedc@ee.ubc.ca (ted chen)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Organization: University of BC, Electrical Engineering
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 00:12:51 GMT

In article <1992Nov22.125529.414@global.hacktic.nl> peter@global.hacktic.nl (Peter Busser) writes:
>
>This means in short that it isn't TBBS that is responsible for the speed, it's
>the hardware. Fortunately, supporting smart hardware isn't a unique TBBS
>feature. An OS/2 or UNIX system which had drivers that could use the same
>boards as TBBS would be as fast if not faster (probably better file system and
>*less* (that's no typo) OS overhead) than DOS+TBBS. The same kind of boards
>exist for UNIX. They might exist for OS/2 too. Any BBS system that can support
>a UNIX tty device or an OS/2 COMxx: device can use these boards and get the
>same or better speed as TBBS.
>
>THERE IS NO ADVANTAGE IN RUNNING TBBS. There *WAS* maybe a reason, but there is
>none anymore.
>
Can TBBS be run in a OS/2 DOS VDM?

---
Ted Chen        <tedc@ee.ubc.ca.>


Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: dougnews@access.digex.com (Doug Humphrey)
Subject: Re: HOLONET? YOu BET!
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 16:33:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.235243.18874@anomaly.sbs.risc.net> kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan) writes:
>If your system offers "open access", with full USENET reading privs without
>age verification, you'd better put some restrictions on various groups like
>alt.sex, rec.arts.erotica, etc., otherwise you'll find 1) some sensationalist
>local newsperson, or 2) the local district attorney breathing down your back
>and no doubt confiscating your equipment for "distributing pornographic
>materials to minors".
>
>If some 13 year old wants to discuss masterbation techniques, fine, he can
>do it on his own system.
>
>MD

Indeed.  When we started the Express Access service, we had to 
deal with this policy question.  We decided that we were not 
comfortable with getting into the editor/censor business, and 
our lawyer agreed that was a slipery slope, so we exercise no
editorial control at all, take any group that a user wants, etc.
Because of this, users must be 18 or older, and our contract 
states that.  We realized that by taking the "open" stance it 
could limit our user community, but in these times when people
sue at a drop of a hat, there was little choice.

-- 
Doug Humphrey    Express Access Public Access Internet   Voice (301) 220-2020
doug@digex.com   Dialup: (301) 220-0462 Login as "new"   Email info@digex.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"I say it again, in the land of the free; use your freedom of choice." -DEVO
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745 
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 18:18:56 GMT

dawson@willard.UUCP writes:

>"With many UNIX based BBS's" would imply that there are ~many~ UNIX BBS's.
>Perhaps you'd care to point me to a list of known UNIX BBS's?  Naturally,
>free/shareware is preferred...

I've used 3 of them, UnixAccess (UnixBBS, Waffle and AKCS)..
-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
From: "tom betz" <tom.betz@execnet.com>
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: need magpie for dos
Date: 13 Nov 92 02:10:25 EST
Reply-To: "tom betz" <tom.betz@execnet.com>
Distribution: alt
Organization: Executive Networks Information

Quoth Luciana Goes Neno regarding NEED MAGPIE FOR DOS on 11-11-92:

LG>Can anybody tell me where I can find the MSDOS version of the
LG>MAGPIE Conferencing Software?

You can always get the absolute latest version at Magpie HQ BBS, NYC, USA, 
212-420-0527.  The author Steve Manes, may be reached via email at 
manes@magpie.nycenet.edu... he may be able to suggest a distribution site 
closer to you.

---
  WinQwk 2.0 a#299  Man invented language to satisfy his need to complain.
--
Executive Network Information System  (914) 667-4567
International ILink Host
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (DWT)
Subject: Re: Compuserve Internet Adress needed
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 18:04:33 GMT
Organization: Contributor Account at ddsw1, Chicago, Illinois  60657

chambles@whale.st.usm.edu (John William Chambless) wrote in
<1992Nov14.183202.19338@ra.msstate.edu>:

| In article <4HN2TB12w165w@pinetree.org> gordon@pinetree.org (Gordon Dewis)
| writes:

| >No, you can't telnet into Compuserve.  I know this because I tried last 
| >night and it didn't work.

| This is incorrect. You can telnet to hermes.merit.edu, then answer 
| "compuserve" to the 'Which Host?' prompt. That will take you directly to
| Compuserve.

CompuServe, however, will bill your account for communications surcharges
as if you were calling in at 9600 bps via SprintNet.

David W. Tamkin   Box 59297   Northtown Station, Illinois  60659-0297
dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com    CompuServe: 73720,1570    MCI Mail: 426-1818
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: n8745184@henson.cc.wwu.edu (hamaker nevada)
Subject: Running a bbs under Unix...
Summary: Question about running bbs under Unix on IBM compatible computer
Keywords: unix bbs
Organization: Western Washington University
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 00:25:05 GMT

I'm currently running a small bbs using Magpie for DOS (anybody else out
there doing the same?).  Eventually, I hope to move the board from the small
XT compatible computer it currently is on to my 386 16 MHz machine that has
four megs of ram and an 80 meg hard drive.  My intention is to continue
running Magpie but, as most of you no doubt are aware, there is a version of
Magpie available for Unix as well.  I have been kicking around the idea of
putting Unix on my machine and running the board under it but, before I do
that, I would appreciate some advice on whether or not that is actually a
good idea.  I don't intend to get into multinode bbs'ing anytime soon, if at
all, and I don't know if there is much of a selection of door programs which
can be run on under Unix.  Also, if I do switch to Unix, which version would
be the best?  Should I go with BSD386, Linux, Coherent, or some other
version?  So, if you are currently running a board under Unix, especially if
you are running Magpie, I would appreciate any input you have.

Thanks.


Nevada Hamaker  n8745184@henson.cc.wwu.edu
Any funny characters after this line stem from my inexperience with vi.  I'm
an emacs man myself.
:

Xref: sparky alt.bbs.allsysop:819 alt.bbs:7152
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.allsysop,alt.bbs
Subject: Re: Nintendo to Apologize, sez PCBoard
From: ** Sender Unknown **
Date: 20 Nov 92 12:59:59 GMT
Organization: DataSoft Consulting (Toronto, Ont. Canada)

greg%tcscs@idss.nwa.com (Gregory Youngblood) writes:

> > **********************************************************************
> >      Statement of Clarification from Arter & Hadden - 11/10/92
> > **********************************************************************
> >  
> > who support the ethical use of software.  Unless you have questions
> > about the action taken against the APL BBS, however, please do not
> > call Clark Development, Nintendo or Nintendo's attorneys.
> >  
> 
> First, I am not a PCBoard sysop, so I did not get this little flier.  If
> I had, I would have been quit upset about it, especially after this little 
> article.  From what I read when I skimed the original posted, they did this
> as a scare tactic to sysops.  I'd have called the attorneys who did this and 
> let them how upset I am by their unprovoked scare tactics.
> 
> I'm still tempted to do it anyway.
> 
> Obviously they don't want to be bothered so they threw that little bit
> in about 'please do not call ...'.  Nintendo and Nintendo's attorneys
> needs to learn they can't resort to scare tactics like this and then sidestep
> responsibility for their actions.

Just a short comment. I am a PCBOARD sysop. I run the BBS where I work. I
wasn't offended by the letter. In fact, I almost never read it. (I typically
trash junk mail without a second thought) After reading it, I wondered why the
heck I received it. A scare tactic it was indeed; however, as soon as I read
it...to went into the blue box with the rest of the junk paper. I personally
think it would have been better of this Law Firm to publicize the case via the
media, and not waste stamps on us sysops.

Mark

----
Club InSaNiTy BBS   |   BBS:+1 416 691 0679 |   root@cibbs.UUCP
DataSoft Consulting | Voice:+1 416 691 5529 |   uunorth!cibbs!root
Mark Buckaway       | Toronto, Ont. CANADA  |   1@4653 (WWIVnet)
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.allsysop:809 alt.bbs:7090
From: Esemi@polaris.utu.fi (Sami-Pekka Hallikas)
Subject: Re: Remote Access FTP Site?
Organization: University of Turku, Finland
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 01:57:38 GMT

e37fast@skyfox.usask.ca wrote:
: I'm looking for an FTP site for Remote Access utilities.  I heard
: something about one going up, but nothing more was said.  If you
: know of an address of such a site please let me know.

Try funic.funet.fi /pub/msdos/bbs/...
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.allsysop:797 alt.bbs:7029