HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: chip@tct.com (Chip Salzenberg)
Subject: Re: [BUG] Problems with ps 0.99.2
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 15:40:40 GMT
Organization: TC Telemanagement, Clearwater, FL

According to andrewc@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Andrew J. Cosgriff !):
>while ps aux | grep uucico | grep -v grep > /dev/null

How about, instead:

  while ps aux | grep '[u]ucico' > /dev/null

-- 
Chip Salzenberg at Teltronics/TCT  <chip@tct.com>, <73717.366@compuserve.com>
  "you make me want to break the laws of time and space / you make me
   want to eat pork / you make me want to staple bagels to my face /
   and remove them with a pitchfork" -- Weird Al Yankovic, "You Make Me"
From: shawnb@ecst.csuchico.edu (S.E. Brown)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Lilo and SLS troubles
Date: 4 Jan 93 22:28:32 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico
NNTP-Posting-Host: cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu

Hello,

I've recently been trying to install Lilo on my SLS Linux system.  I've run
into a problem that I hope some kind soul can help me out with.  First of all,
my system configuration is as follows:

      16 megs RAM
      2 Hard drives (40 meg and 20 meg) with:
        /dev/hda1 Linux/Minix partition (40 megs)
        /dev/hdb1 Linux/Minix partition (12 megs with /home mounted on it)
        /dev/hdb2 Linux swap (8 megs)
        (I have no dos partitions)

When I initially tested lilo, as suggested in the sparse non-LaTeX docs (I can'tread LaTeX documents either) I installed lilo on a floppy in /dev/fd0 with the
following command: 
    
      lilo -b /dev/fd0 -i boot.b -v -v -v /Image

When I boot off this floppy, it appears to load everything correctly, the
cirtual terminal and lp initialization appears on the screen which is followed
by the following error message:

      Unable to handle kernel paging request at address c1000000
      Oops: 0002
      EIP:    0008:00042930
      EFLAGS: 00010287
      fs: 0017
      base: C0000000, limit: 000A0000
      Pid: 0, process nr: 0
      c6 00 00 40 42 39 ca 7c f7 89
      task[0] (swapper) killed: unable to recover
      Kernel panic: Trying to free up swapper memory space
      In swapper task - not syncing

What is going on here? Can anyone help?

Thanks is advance, please respond by email so I don't miss the response in the
incredible traffic this newsgroup gets, if anyone requests, I will post a
summary of the responses for people with similar problems.

S.E.P. Brown
shawnb@cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: seidl@alw.nih.gov (Edward Seidl)
Subject: Re: swap partitions bigger than 16M???
Organization: National Inst. of Health, DCRT, CSL
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 14:13:06 GMT

In article <C0C006.Bot@ra.nrl.navy.mil>, eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil (Eric Youngdale) writes:
|> In article <726137676.AA29981@remote.halcyon.com> Jim.Lawhon@f6008.n124.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Lawhon) writes:
|> >To: seidl@alw.nih.gov (Edward Seidl)
|> >
|> > ES> Brief description of my problem:  I configured my hard disk to 
|> > ES> have a 32M swap partition as /dev/hda2, 
|> > ES> did "mkswap /dev/hda2 32xxx", and then "swapon /dev/hda2". 
|> >                           ^^^^^
|> >                           blocks
|> >
|> >One block = 512 bytes X 32xxx = 16M ...
|> 
|> 	No!  Edward had it right.  You are confusing blocks and sectors.
|> I believe that the problem is that there is a 16Mb limit to the size of a
|> swap partition. 
|> 
|> -Eric
|> -- 
|> Eric Youngdale

Thanks to all who e-mailed me on this one.  Word from God himself (i.e. Linus)
is that 16M is the limit for now, but he may get around to bumping it up in
several months.  He gave me hints on how to do it myself, though, so I'm going
to roll up my sleeves and start hacking around in the mm source.  If I get
anything working (and if there's interest) I'll post the diffs...and send them
to Linus.  If I don't get anything working...
Anyway, don't hold your collectivebreath, my first two stabs at it have failed
spectacularly :-{


-- 
Edward Seidl                                      DCRT/CSL Bldg 12A, Rm 2033
seidl@alw.nih.gov                                 NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892  

I'm not paid enough to have an opinion, much less express one for my employer.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: gero@gkminix.han.de (Gero Kuhlmann)
Subject: Re: BUG in 0.99[p1] kernel c
Organization: gkminix, Hannover, Germany
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 19:41:52 GMT
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Michael Will (michaelw@mcshh.Hanse.DE) wrote:
> Andy.Tainter@f615.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Andy Tainter) writes:
> >You *CAN* have more than one card on INT 2, this is a cascaded int and
> >you can have upto 7 (may be 6) devices using it...
> 
> >That is DOS, maybe linux cannot do that, but the hardware is set upto
> >do
> >it...
> Funny thing, we had an ne2000-ethernetcard running on  irq2 in a novell
> lan, then using it in linux worked after configuring the driver as irq9
> the card still on irq2...
> 
> ...anyone knowing *details* about this things?

Well, in fact the line called IRQ2 on the ISA bus is really connected to
the IRQ9 input of the slave interrupt controller. The slave controller is
then connected to IRQ2 of the master controller. On old PCs and XTs there
was no slave controller. Therefore the line called IRQ2 really went to
the IRQ2 input of the master. But not on ATs and later.

Therefore if you use the IRQ2 line on the ISA bus, the software should be
configured to use the IRQ9 vector. Besides: the Linux serial drivers
cares for this by itself.

gero.

-- 
Gero Kuhlmann			Zerberus:  G.KUHLMANN@A-LINK-H.ZER
Donarweg 4			SubNet:    gero@gkminix.sub.org
D-3000 Hannover 51              IN:        gero@gkminix.han.de
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jstump@auntbea.austin.ibm.com (John E. Stump)
Subject: Re: New curses in the works
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 15:22:37 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: IBM AWD Austin, TX

In article <1993Jan5.204243.21587@serval.net.wsu.edu> hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu) writes:
>In article <C0Dz4A.KEK@austin.ibm.com>, jstump@auntbea.austin.ibm.com (John E. Stump) writes:
[..deleted..]
>
>John, my email was bounced.
>
>   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>>>> DATA
><<< 550 <auntbea.austin.ibm.com!jstump@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com>... Host unknown
>550 auntbea.austin.ibm.com!jstump@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com... User unknown: Bad file number
>
>------------
>I am thinking to do the same thing when I get the time. Which version are
>you using? What is the latest version?
>
>H.J.

The only version information I could find in the sources was this:
"The REAL Alpha-one release Version"

If there is a newer version somewhere, I would appreciate any pointers.

Sorry about my address. I forgot to update my .sig file. Please send
Email to the address below.

john

-- 
John Stump (jstump@netftp.austin.ibm.com)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: pmacdona@sanjuan (Peter MacDonald)
Subject: Re: Ctl-Atl-Del and Linux 0.99 patchlevel 2.
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria B.C. CANADA
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 93 21:25:22 GMT

In article <726191986snx@wicked.demon.co.uk> pep@wicked.demon.co.uk writes:
>In article <nnhut.726156842@bcarh676> nnhut@bnr.ca (Nhut Nguyen) writes:
>> Happy New Year to all of you Linuxers!
>> 
>> I just compiled the newest Linux 0.99 patch level 2 without any problem.
>> However, when I want to reboot, Ctl-Alt-Del does not work anymore. I have
>> to push the RESET button to reboot. This happens with the new patch level
>> 2 only. Is there any new change that disables this key combination ? And 
>> how to make it work again ? I am using the default settings for US keyboad
>> in the Makefile.
>> 
>> BTW, I have a 486/33 with an OPTi chipset.
>> 
>> Thanks and happy Linuxing....
>> --
>Ha, I thought it was just me!
>
>Yep, I have the same problem: I also have a 486/33 with Opti chipset & AMI bios

Uh, Oh.  This just twigged a memory.  Wasn't there a reported incompatibility
between the OPTi chipset and some SCSI ctls (AH 1542B??)?

Peter

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Subject: ANSWER: (Re: Can't get the GCC 2.3.3 to work right.  :()
Organization: School of EECS, Washington State University
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 20:49:07 GMT

In article <9301051814.AA29042@deepthought.cs.utexas.edu>, STDN%MARIST.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (Dan Newcombe) writes:
|> Last night I installed the lib.so.4.2 stuff and gcc 2.3.3
|> I didn't seem to have any problems with the lib stuff.
|> (I installed the Image-4.2.tar.Z file and the include files,
|> and the extra-4.2.tar.Z files.  The jump-4.2.tz looked like it
|> was just stuff to make the other libraries.  I then untarred
|> gcc 2.3.3.  I was able to compile programs, but when I compiled
|> my xhello program (4 #include's and 5 lines of code) it gave me an
|> exec that was over 500K (using 2.2.2 the exec was about 15K!)
|> What would cause this?  I tried to compile it with the
|> -L/usr/lib/shlib/jump option (which worked under 2.2.2) but that
|> gave me an error saying something close to:
|> (crt0.o) : Undefined symbol __envrion referenced from text segment.
|> 
|> Any help is appreciated.
|> 
|>    -Dan
|> 
|> Dan Newcombe
|> stdn@vm.marist.edu                        kk4d@maristb.marist.edu
|> dnewcomb@cybernet.cse.fau.edu             And others...
|> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|> - Real programmers like vending machine popcorn.  Coders pop it in the
|>   microwave oven.  Real programmers use the heat given off by the cpu.
|>   They can tell what job is running just by listening to the rate of popping.

This is from updated relaese notes for libc 4.2.

------------
Please get the latest binutils.TZ from tsx-11.mit.edu if you cannot
get your binaries linked with the shared libraries. Starting with this
release, I used a new structure for libraries.  The different versions
of each library, i.e., static, jump table and classic shared library,
are in the same directory, /usr/lib.  To illustrate, if the library is
named foo, then the static version is libfoo.a.  The jump table version
is libfoo.sa and the classic version is libfoo.ca.  The new `ld', which
is in binutils.TZ and on the third disk of the Linux Base System on
tsx-11.mit.edu, searches for the jump table library by default.  You
can overwrite it by adding -static or -nojump to `ld' or 'gcc'.  The
jump table and classic versions are not compatible with each other.
The static library should be used as a last resort. You can rename your
old shared libraries, notablely Xfree386, to fit the new scheme. The
script should look something like that:

----------
#!/bin/sh

cd /usr/X386/lib
for l in shlib/jump/*
do
  s=`basename $l .a`
  mv $l $s.sa
done
for l in shlib/nojump/*
do
  s=`basename $l .a`
  mv $l $s.ca
done
----------

Please make sure it works right before you run it.

-------------

H.J.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: "stephen brown" <stephen.brown@canrem.com>
Subject: lilo, mouse & dialing
Reply-To: "stephen brown" <stephen.brown@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: comp
Date: 5 Jan 93 13:14:25 EST


I'm just learning Unix. I installed the minimal SLS 0.98 on my system a
few days ago. I have a couple of questions and would like everyone who
could to answer.

1. How do I install LILO to enable me to boot Linux without the floppy?
2. Is it possible for me to dial into my local BBS using Linux? If it
   is how do I go about it.
3. How do I get my mouse to work (or be recognized by Linux)?

Like I mentioned earlier, I'm just learning Linux. I know that the FAQ
could help a lot but I can't seem to get it going. I only installed the
"A" series of the disks.
You DON'T have to answer all 3 questions. Just answer the portion you
can.

My system is:
=============
IBM clone = i386sx 16mhz (very, very slooooow - I know)
2mb Ram   = (with 6.5mb Linux swap on /dev/hda3)
14mb      = Linux partition on /dev/hda2
20mb      = MS-DOS partition
2400bd fax/modem on Comm 2
PS/2 style mouse

+-----------------------------ADDRESS--------------------------------+
| AUTHOR:  Stephen Brown                       PHONE: (416) 270-6692 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| E-MAIL:  1.  stephen.brown@canrem.com ---> (Internet/Usenet)       |
|          2.  sbrown@r-node.pci.on.ca ----> (Internet/Usenet)       |
|          3.  1:229/15 -------------------> (Fidonet)               |
|                                                                    |
| POSTAL:  P.O. Box 77210, Courtney Park P.O., Mississauga, Ontario  |
|          L5T 2P4 Canada                                            |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+  
---
  ATP/msdos 1.40  Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: hank@informatik.uni-essen.de (Hendrik Seliger (Messtechnik - Tel. 2898))
Subject: HELP me! NFS quit it's job!
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 10:20:40 GMT
Organization: Uni-Essen
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

I need help!

Yesterday I booted my Linux system for the first time in days, because I
had 0.99-p2 installed. What happened was that I can no loger mount any NFS
directories. Well, I booted again from the old system, but it won't work!
I guess I've now tried almost all combinations of what I might have changed
(like trying all verions of libc.so.4.xx, several versions of mount, mostly 
from the SLS-releases and the newest FSF-stuff from tsx-11, with both
0.99-p0 and 0.99-p2). It just won't mount my most precious NFS directory
any more. No, it not already mounted, and no, the mount point is not 
busy (made a new one to check), and yes, I use 'mount -t nfs' to be
sure about the fs type. The error message I get (besides the busy stuff)
.. nfs_read_super: missing something (I just went about to check, but it's 
gone (only the nfs_read_super stuff) when X is running. Funny).
If I don't use the '-t nfs' option I get an unknown error 26240.

WHAT IS GOING ON?? Any clues to what I might have broke fooling around
with this nice Linux system are appreciated. Save my soul (and my time, and
my nerves).   Thanks lot!

Hendrik.

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: keiblin@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de (Alexander Keiblinger)
Subject: [Q] Out of memory Probs with 99p2 -- Wrong Cache detect ???
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Organization: Techn. University of Berlin, Germany
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 21:51:07 GMT

Hy there,
trying to install SLS-Linux 0.99 I ran in strange problems.
SLS seemed to install right, but at the bootup prompt the memory was detected
wrong. Seemed, that the Linux-kernel sees 256KB Cache, but there are only 64K.

Compiling Linux 0.99 & 0.99p2 gets stuck at compiling tty_io.c and efsck prints
Out of Memory ... Killing ... uhhhh.

Hardware:
-UMC Motherboard with AMD 386-40 DX (4MB)
-AMI 386 Bios #ZB254942
-64KB Cache from 256KB possible (Jumpers are set right to 64KB)
-WD Caviar IDE-HD 170Megs
-ET 4000 SVGA

Any suggestions ???
I have no idea. This is the 3rd Hardware I installed Linux and the first
to create problems.
From: richb@jti.com (Richard Braun)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: known problem with email...buy why?
Date: 5 Jan 93 20:40:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: jti.C0EEro.6vt
Organization: Jupiter Technology Inc. / Waltham, MA

Problem:  mail file ownership isn't right

Solution:  set mail files to correct owner, mode 600, group mail

Implementation:  Using the source code from mailpak-1.3, modify mail
	so it contains a seteuid call just after startup.  This call
	should switch from root to that of the person running it.
	Then in the send.c module, switch back to root when writing
	the /usr/spool/mail file.  After writing the file, chown,
	chgrp, and chmod it.  There are two places you have to do this.

Installation:  chown root /bin/mail
	       chmod u+s /bin/mail

This is how the mailers I've seen on SysV, AIX and SCO systems work.
If there's any demand for my mods, as suggested in another posting I
will make them available to the mailpak maintainer.

-rich
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: alsaggaf@athena.mit.edu (M. Saggaf)
Subject: Re: problem with Seyon
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
	<ALSAGGAF.93Jan7133230@e40-008-4.mit.edu> <C0opyt.5p0@dei.unipd.it>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 14:38:47 GMT

>>>>> On Mon, 11 Jan 1993 10:18:29 GMT, beppe@sabrina.dei.unipd.it (Giuseppe Zanetti) said:

GZ> Hi linuxers,

GZ> I have Seyon 1.6 (binaries for linux found in the official seyon
GZ> site at mit), it works well, but i have a problem with overlapping
GZ> buttons (toggles) in the set windows (and in another window that i
GZ> do not remeber).

GZ> can anyone help me

Those are now old, I have replaced them with the new linux binary
distribution that I released a couple of days ago, which you can also
get from nic.funet.fi and sunsite. The problem you have is that you're
using the app-defaults of 1.7 with binaries of 1.6.

Starting from 1.74 (beta), you won't ever see any overlapping buttons
even if you don't have an app-defaults file, since from that version on
Seyon uses fallback resources if the app-defaults file is missing. The
version in the binary distribution is 1.72 though.

All the best,

/Muhammad M. Saggaf                 | Stop the genocide
 alsaggaf@athena.mit.edu            | Save Bosnia



Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: dosburn@cwis.unomaha.edu (Don Osburn)
Subject: LILO HELP PLEASE
Summary: Need LILO HELP Please!
Keywords: lilo
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 03:53:26 GMT

I am having serious difficulties with lilo and need help.  I am not
experienced at all with this, and I really can not seem to figure out
what is going on / wrong even though I have  read all the documentation.
I currently have BootManager, and OS/2, and Linux installed with
everything working except to boot linux I must use a floppy.  The linux
I am using is the SLS version.  (I downloaded SLS a, b, and c and
installed.)  I have been trying to use the lilo version that came with
the SLS to get linux to boot from the hard drive under BootManager.  It
seems to run ok, but when I boot to it, I get "LILO loading......" and
then it appears to start to boot normally.  It reports on lpt1, etc,
then I get a kernal panic saying it cannot handle swap request at such
and such a place.  After trying all kinds of things in vain, I removed
the version of lilo I had installed, and went to tsx-11.mit.edu to get
lilo.8.tar.Z.  I did all the make s to get this version ready, and then
tried to run it using 

/# /etc/lilo/lilo -b /dev/hda1 -i /etc/lilo/boot.b -v -v -v /Image

and now it tells me:

DEVICE 0X0301: MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CYLINDERS IS 1023, NOT 1024.

I have no idea what this means.  Although the documentation for lilo is
very nice, I can not for the life of me figure out what the heck is
going on.  Can some kind soul take my hand and walk me through this?
Thanks in advance.

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: bob@amscons.amscons.com (Bob Amstadt)
Subject: Re: BUG in 0.99[p1] kernel c
Organization: Amstadt Consulting Group
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 09:17:13 GMT
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

Andy.Tainter@f615.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Andy Tainter) writes:
: Interesting, we have done it on a couple of really loaded PC's at work
: with no apparent problems...

Of course, some cards are created with the thought of sharing interrupts
in mind.  If they only use a pull-up resistor on the board to take the
signal high, then there is no problem with sharing the same interrupt.
However, if just one card on a given interrupt uses an active pull-up
(such as the output of any non-open-collector TTL part), then the
interrupt cannot be safely shared.  You may get away with it, but it
probably won't last for ever.
-- 
Bob Amstadt
bob@amscons.com
From: majid@chimere.enst.fr (Fazal Majid)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: SLS GCC chokes on TIFF libraries
Date: 11 Jan 93 11:05:16 GMT
Organization: Telecom Paris, France

When I compiled the TIFF libraries from the XV package, gcc used 20 M of virtual
memory to compile the group III fax compression code. This is because gcc has a
misfeature (not quite a bug) (in the compiler) that makes it use incredible
quantities of memory when it has large statically (i.e. initialized at
compile-time) arraysa, as is the case with Fax G III (in fact, these are so
large, they're machine-generated...)

-- 
Fazal Majid			Tel. (1) 45 81 79 11     /   / /|  / /  / \  /
chambre D213			     (1) 45 89 15 20    /   / / | / /  /   \/
212 r. de Tolbiac		majid@inf.enst.fr      /__ / /  |/ /__/  __/\
75013 Paris, France
				Linux, the FREE 386/486 Unix to liberate the
world from the curse of MS-DOS. Feel free to mail me for more info. -- Fazal
From: lukka@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Tuomas J Lukka)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: 386 BSD
Date: 6 Jan 93 08:59:05 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki

In article <C0F8L6.AB4@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Jeff-Randall@uiuc.edu (Jeff Randall) writes:
>othman@ntrc25.ntrc.ntu.ac.sg (othman (EEE/Div 4)) writes:
>
>>It is a fully networking OS.
>>It has almost everything that Linux has except dos emulator and improved
>>387 emulator.

EXCEPT for one feature I consider pretty good:
when you get the distribution, there's source for everything
right there. If you get Linux, you have to hunt all over the place
for the source if you want it. 

Also, 386BSD har ref.tfs.com, a central source tree, which I've talked
about here.

BUT there are bad sides to it, too: the distributions are much rarer,
we're waiting for the next one which  was hinted to arrive sometime
in march or so. In Linux, you get a new kernel with lots of bug
fixes every couple of weeks.

One good thing about 386BSD: it's newsgroup has a LOT less FAQ's asked.

Maybe we should make a file that makes an UNBIASED comparation between
the two as a FAQ... anyone ready to work with me?

>>20Mbyte for (networking)binaries only
>>40Mbyte with X
>>50Mbyte with Xview
>
>Not to start a flame war, but does 386BSD now have shared libs as well?
>Those numbers seem to be more what a linux system ends up using.. and I've
>been told by local 386BSD users that their systems are much larger than
>a linux system (due to the lack of shared libs).

No, not yet. They're in the works, by a mailing list on ref.tfs.com,
386bsd-sharedlibs. The implementation is going to be rather high-tech
(non-kludged). The current linux shared libraries do their job but
are very difficult to generate, have to have fixed addresses in the
address space etc. 

NOTE:
 I'm not trying to start a flame war, however, I think that an
 unbiased mutual FAQ would serve everyone well. The current
 comments about 386BSD in the Linux FAQ are rather dated
 (saying for example, that only vanilla vga is supported by
  it's X etc. Linux and 386BSD both use XFree!)
 Myself, I used 386BSD until christmas, and at christmas
 changed to Linux. But when 386BSD 0.2 comes out,
 I might swap again, who knows. No fanatic feelings.

	TJL
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: vishal@sarang (Vishal Misra)
Subject: Re: mail over smtp
Organization: Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 03:38:05 GMT


Try the smailnet.taz file in sunsite Incoming/newspak/1.2 - it is smail
with smtp support - works like a dream fro me ( incoming/outgoing) - and
the config file is 5 line long!! ( I spent 9 days struggling with
sendmail.cf before giving up..)..
									Vishal

--
__Vishal Misra_________________________________________________________________
__28-B, Kumkum Apts_______Communications Lab___________________________________
__Vile Parle (West)_______Dept. of Elect.Engg._________________________________
__Bombay - 400 056________IIT Bombay___________________________________________
__Phone: 6121022(R)_______5782545 extn 2499_________vishal@ee.iitb.ernet.in__
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux