HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bur@ultisol.gsfc.nasa.gov (MAC)
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: alt.santaism
Organization: NASA/GSFC code 923
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 20:26:11 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.060620.23826@netcom.com> Jef Poskanzer <jef@netcom.com> writes:
>I propose a new group dedicated to discussion of the religion Santaism.
>Some points in its favor:
>
> - Santaism is practiced, to some degree, by hundreds of millions
>   of people world-wide, especially in the English-speaking world
>   where netnews is concentrated.
>
> - The evidence for the existence of Santa is precisely as good as
>   the evidence for any other religion's holy figure.
>
> - Anyone who objects to the newsgroup will get a lump of coal.
>
>All varieties of Santaists would be welcome in this group, from
>the Fundamentalists (believe that Santa exists as a corporeal being,
>lives at the North Pole, and personally vists every chimney in the
>world in one night), to the Reform Santaists (believe that the
>presents are placed under the tree by loving parents, but that
>those parents are animated by the all-pervading spirit of Santa).
>
>Since Santaism's yearly holy day is only two weeks away, I would
>like to move quickly on this newsgroup.  If I don't hear any
>objections (coal...) I'll send out the newgroup tomorrow.




Jef, is this really you?  Or is this Becker?  Come on Becker,
'fess up.  It it is really you Jef, I agree to it under one
condition.  That you forge the newgroup so that it looks like
Becker did it.  Otherwise, I am against this group. 

The ball is in your court.


TTFN,
M
From: ns@csd.cri.dk (Nick Sandru)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: newgroup alt.graphics
Date: 17 Dec 92 15:47:32 GMT
Organization: Computer Resources International A/S

bdb@becker.gts.org, playing jef@netcom.com (Jef Puskanzer) writes:


>Q: how many newsgroups does it take to change a lightbulb?


>A: 100 more newgroups than rmgroups


Q: Why shouldn't Bruce Becker be allowed to change a lightbulb?

A: Because the new one would be a forgery.

Long Haired Nick
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.atheism
From: oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Tig Stone)
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: alt.santaism
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 08:10:39 GMT


In article <1992Dec12.060620.23826@netcom.com> jef@netcom.com (Jef Poskanzer) writes:

> I propose a new group dedicated to discussion of the religion Santaism.

	Well, first of all, _I_ saw this as alt.satanism, and I'm sure
that most people would misread it on first glance.  Perhaps something
like alt.religion.santa if you're serious.

--
Tig Stone 
(oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu)
From: msc9315@geovax.ed.ac.uk
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: alt.fan.catch-22
Date: 16 Dec 92 12:39:10 GMT
Organization: University of Edinburgh, Geography Department.

In article <BzAxpv.IpB@unix.amherst.edu>, twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
> In article <1992Dec15.122210.1@geovax.ed.ac.uk> msc9315@geovax.ed.ac.uk writes:
> 
>>Catch-22 would be an excellent newsgroup.
>>Haven't seen a better proposal all term.
> 
> I have.  I'd bet ten dollars to anyone interested that the traffic
> dried up and flies away within two weeks of group creation.
> 

  Tim, my friend, if I had ten dollars I'd put my money on the table.
  Make it ten ecus?

  <<< It remains a Heller of a good idea  >>>
  
           (--)             [Rocks  say  goodbye]
  J.     (-----)             [Clouds say  hello]
          (-(--) 
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: monitn@vccnw02.its.rpi.edu (Nicholas Monitto)
Subject: Re: Proposal: alt.tv.mash
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:19:48 GMT

kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry) writes:

>norbeck@pleiades.cs.bucknell.edu (Naughty Nukes NY in her 1999 Nissan) writes:
>>
>>Proposal:  alt.tv.mash

>No, no, no: alt.tv.m*a*s*h!

>That way they'll never be able to rmgroup it, because if they tried
>they'd delete everything that had an m, an a, an s, and an h in that
>order.  

>Hey, did you buy the 1999 Nissan from Martin Landau, used, by any chance?


>Seriously, do the M*A*S*H group.  It's the 20th anniversary of the TV
>series, the remastered episodes have recently begun to air, the final
>episode will be repeated for the first time in two months...  

>							-- K.

I second- I think the group would be good. I'm an occasional follower (it
being a pain to find in syndication sometimes) and I'd like to see the group.
With the remastering episodes starting to show up, there may be a rebirth for
it.

Nick
monitn@rpi.edu


Xref: sparky alt.config:8070 alt.sys.amiga.uucp:2989 comp.sys.amiga.misc:18884 comp.sys.amiga.datacomm:8297
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Friday, 11 Dec 1992 21:06:22 EST
From: <IO81373@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: RE: ALT.MUSIC.SKA

Hello???
Is anybody out there???????????
I'd like to know about the opening of ALT.MUSIC.SKA.
I will continue posting irritating posts such as these until
this demand is met.
Please please please please....
ALT.MUSIC.SKA is needed.


&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
&&Douglas Julien|Opinions expresed here are neither those of the    &&
&&aka Dougly    |University of Maine nor of the Universitaet        &&
&&              |Salzburg, but what do THEY know???                 &&
&&----------------------------------------------------------------  &&
&&io81373@maine.maine.edu                       IO81373@MAINE.bitnet&&
&&==================================================================&&
&& "Ich glaube, der Mensch traeumt nur, damit er nicht aufhoere zu  &&
&& sehen."   -J.W. von Goethe   'Die Wahlverwandtschaften'          &&
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.religion.kibology,alt.net.personalities,alt.slack
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: alt.flame.hairy-douchebag.bruce-becker
Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Turkey Division
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 04:49:16 GMT

In article <Jym.16Dec1992.1640@naughty-peahen> Jym Dyer <jym@mica.berkeley.edu> writes:

>> I HEREBY CALL FOR THE CREATION OF alt.flame.hairy-douchebag.bruce-becker!!
>
>=o= Don't do it.  Send out an rmgroup.  That way, the person who
>would newgroup it would be Becker himself.

On this machine (running C news with Chip Salzenberg's
newgroup/rmgroup scripts) rmgroups are ignored if the group doesn't
already exist here.  I'd be more than happy to newgroup it if someone
else is willing to rmgroup it thereafter.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /               Rocks say goodbye.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) / 
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: slb22@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Seth "the Lesser")
Subject: Re: Alt.quotes newsgroup?
Organization: Generic American College Kids (G.A.C.K.)
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 09:15:39 GMT
Reply-To: slb22@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Seth "the Lesser")
X-Posted-From: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

TWChan@lbl.gov (Terry Chan) writes:
>
>I would suggest making it alt..sig, hmmm...how about alt.\.sig...er..
>well, something like that.  After all, it's probably likely that much
>of the stuff will come from .sigs.

Ghod, I *hope* not.  I find that most of the quotations I really like are too
long to fit in a .sig along with my name and addresses, and I regularly see
wretchedly mangled out-of-context quotations in others' .sigs.

Seth L. Blumberg          \ Warning: This posting has been determined to cause
slb22@columbia.edu (play)   \ cancer in laboratory animals.  Please make sure
sethb@ctr.columbia.edu (work) \ that no white mice are allowed to read it.  
    > No one I know shares my opinions, least of all Columbia University. <
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: forb0004@student.tc.umn.edu (Eric Forbis )
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: alt.fan.anne-rice
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 19:50:48 GMT

In article <Bz7MGA.KvH@unix.amherst.edu> twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
>In article <forb0004.137.724234396@student.tc.umn.edu> forb0004@student.tc.umn.edu (Eric Forbis ) writes:
>
>>Even when 
>>the average user is aware of their existence, seeking out other lists may be 
>>beyond their desire or ability. Some of them aren't fortunate enough to have 
>>been born with the computer geek gene, and see this as a major hassle.
>
>The fellow who recently proposed alt.fan.boc has been neatly directed
>at the Blue Oyster Cult mailing list.  It doesn't seem to me that the
>"computer geek gene" has anything to do with it.  Your argument here
>could easily be used on any non-technical mailing list at all; the
>thriving existence of such lists contradicts you.

And your argument could be used against half the groups already existing on 
usenet. The "thriving list" argument doesn't hold much water; there are over 
a million readers of usenet, yet not a tenth of that number use lists 
actively. I haven't met a _single person _ discussing Anne Rice's books who 
knew about the mailing list, and I've suggested forming an alt group 
elsewhere to boot... 

The mailing list idea has been beaten to death here, yet not a single 
potential anne-rice user has come out in its favor. Pretty clear indication 
of what they want.

Another post (the one where you grew enthusiastic over starting an alt group 
for a single book, Heller's Catch-22-- talk about narrow focus...) was 
forwarded to rec.arts.books. We may soon be getting input from that 
newsgroup as well; should be interesting.
---------

Eric Forbis      forb0004@student.tc.umn.edu
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: wiggins@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (Don Wiggins)
Subject: Re: New group proposal: alt.conservative.forum
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 13:45:56 GMT

rlc1028@zeus.tamu.edu writes:
>	The Right has its own set of buzz-words, principles, slogans,
>and ideologues.  In fact, wasn't the term, "politically correct" first
>used by Right wingers to refer to a set of political assumptions that had
>begun to prevail in America?  I never heard of the term until conservatives
>on this campus used to as a rallying cry to fight off perceived liberal
>policies here.  In doing so, they're setting up their own agenda of
>"how things ought to be".  That's the essence of a Politically Correctivist
>system.

It seems to me that "politically correct" was a term originated by the
Marxists, and was used to describe their own internally acceptable thoughts
and ideas.  I'll have to do some digging and get back to you.

|===========================================================================|
|Don Wiggins, German-Irish-American    | Success is getting what you want.  |
| & Advance Scout for the Baby Boomers | Happiness is wanting what you get. |
|Internet: wiggins@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu |     -- Brother Dave Gardner        |
|===========================================================================|
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: mgm@world.std.com (michael g moncur)
Subject: Re: New newsgroup proposal - alt.quotations
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 03:28:28 GMT

terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.) writes:

>  We already have alt.fan.warlord, where .sigs (and flames about same) get
>posted, and alt.motd, where "witty sayings of the day" (AKA quotations or
>fortune cookies") were posted. Do we really need another group? Why not
>take over alt.motd, since it's empty (here), or include removing alt.motd
>as part of your proposal (not that that will do a lot of good until some-
>one gets Becker on a _real_ short leash).

Many .sigs don't qualify as quotations, and flames about .sigs would
certainly have no place in alt.quotations (as I'm sure they have no place
in a.f.w, but that's not the point.)
 
As for alt.motd, it wouldn't bother me a bit if it were removed, but I
don't want to cloud the issue by proposing a rmgroup.  After
alt.quotations is created, someone is welcome to propose an rmgroup of
alt.motd (for all the good that will do.)
 
...and besides, "alt.motd" sounds like another soc. group...  Like
motss and motos.  Members of the Day?  I dunno.

-- 
~`~`michael moncur - mgm@world.std.com / sysop@onlybbs.via.mind.org ~`~`

Newsgroups: alt.config
From: oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Tig Stone)
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL : New group alt.swimming-with-clothes
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 21:28:30 GMT


In article <1992Dec11.171125.17494@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> pvs9@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (Praktikum Verteilte Systeme) writes:

> Thus, I propose the creation of a new group :

>   alt.swimming-with-clothes.

[...]

> Why an alt.* group ?
> --------------------

> Because this is a rather exotic topic. The traffic would probably be quite
> small, and I don't think it would suffice for a group in the rec.sports.*
> hierarchy.

	Do you honestly think that there would be ANY traffic in this
group?  Have you tried starting threads on this topic elsewhere?  Is
it innundating the newsgroups elsewhere so much that an alt group is
necessary?  It seems to me that this is a very out-in-left-field topic
of conversation, and doesn't warrant a newsgroup (IMHO, of course).

--
Tig Stone 
(oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu)
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: cs911461@ariel.yorku.ca (CHRISTIAN D. ARMOUR)
Subject: Re: New newsgroup proposal - alt.quotations 
Organization: York University, Toronto, Canada
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 04:40:11 GMT


The quotation group will just become a vehicle which low knaves
will use to flame others.  It is a bad idea.

cak

Newsgroups: alt.config,rec.games.mud.misc
From: durrell@pinball.arcade.uiowa.edu (Bryant Durrell)
Subject: Re: alt.mud.logs,alt.mud.logs.d,alt.mud.fiction,alt.mud.fiction.d
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 03:16:29 GMT
Organization: University of Iowa

In article <1992Dec12.023513.23986@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (JKF) writes:
>In article <1992Dec11.133913.21067@oz.plymouth.edu> j_herlih@oz.plymouth.edu (Axl) writes:
>>	Christ, give it up, willya?  The majority has spoken, so just
>>accept it.  Make a mailing list or something.  There certainly isn't
>>any justification for a newsgroup (alt.* or not) with so diminutive an
>>audience.

>The majority opposed adding these groups to rec.*.  They did not vote on
>whether there should be groups of this sort at all, as there was no
>question concerning this on the ballot.  Seventy-some people indicated
>interest in the groups for whatever reason.  As the groups prosper and
>succeed, perhaps more will take up the banner.

Hey, that's cute.  He's trying to argue that a lot of people
wanted the groups, but didn't want them in rec.  Sounds likely
to me.

I assume the newsadmins reading alt.config know this is Joel's
little joke, right?  It'd be a shame if anyone was fooled.  A
data point:  one of his proposed moderators said he never 
thought anyone would take it that seriously.

-- 
Bryant Durrell					   durrell@chop.isca.uiowa.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 I feed on the flesh of the living, and I vote.
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Tig Stone)
Subject: Re: Proposal: alt.tv.saved.by.the.bell
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 00:43:06 GMT


In article <1992Dec13.202758.10109@cs.unca.edu> mcmahan@cs.unca.edu (Scott McMahan -- Genesis mailing list owner) writes:

> Well, there's alt.tv.90210 and alt.tv.fifteen, so I guess:

> alt.tv.saved.by.the.bell

> is the logical next step.

> Is anyone besides me interested in it?

Besides the fact that the name is horrible (.'s separate hierarchies,
NOT words), No.



--
Tig Stone 
(oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu)
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: jecoleb@eos.ncsu.edu (have clue, will travel)
Subject: Re: Proposal: alt.tv.saved.by.the.bell
Reply-To: jecoleb@eos.ncsu.edu
Organization: The Ghost Of Christmas Past Society
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 19:34:16 GMT


twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
>In article <42531@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> pashley@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Montykins) writes:

>>   (In fact, maybe "exploitation" should be before "tv" so's to
>>allow for "alt.exploitation.movies" which actually would get a
>>reader or two.)

>Would we need to seperate on the basis of media?  Why not simply
>alt.exploitation.teen, alt.exploitation.black,
>alt.exploitation.baby-m, and so on?
alt.exploitation.aquaria...

and the grand prize winner:
alt.exploitation.yossarian...

which brings us all full circle to the catch-22 thread.  :)

--
          jecoleb@eos.ncsu.edu : have clue, will travel.
       ---------------------------------------------------
     It's time to see the world / It's time to kiss the girl
              It's time to cross the wild meridian
  Grab your bag and take a chance / Time to learn a Cajun dance
             Kid, you're gonna see the morning sun... 
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: jecoleb@eos.ncsu.edu (have clue, will travel)
Subject: Re: Proposal: alt.tv.saved.by.the.bell
Reply-To: jecoleb@eos.ncsu.edu
Organization: The Ghost Of Christmas Past Society
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 00:30:40 GMT


>Well, there's alt.tv.90210 and alt.tv.fifteen, so I guess:
>
>alt.tv.saved.by.the.bell
>
>is the logical next step.

I'd prefer to propose:

alt.tv.teen.exploitation.shows

to cover such entries as 90210, Wetnose Place, Silver Spoons, Saved 
By The Bell, Charles in Charge, Swans Crossing, and similar affronts
to UHF programming.  

You could even have an entire section of the FAQ dedicated to Punky 
Brewster and Small Wonder.

--
          jecoleb@eos.ncsu.edu : have clue, will travel.
       ---------------------------------------------------
     It's time to see the world / It's time to kiss the girl
              It's time to cross the wild meridian
  Grab your bag and take a chance / Time to learn a Cajun dance
             Kid, you're gonna see the morning sun...
From: terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: New newsgroup proposal - alt.quotations
Date: 16 Dec 92 04:44:54 GMT
Followup-To: alt.config
Organization: St. Peter's College, US

In article <BzADnv.HFL@world.std.com>, mgm@world.std.com (michael g moncur) writes:
>     I think there's quite a bit of interest.  We see quotations all over,
> particularly in  .sigs.  When this was first mentioned in alt.config,
> there were 8 responses in one day. 

  We already have alt.fan.warlord, where .sigs (and flames about same) get
posted, and alt.motd, where "witty sayings of the day" (AKA quotations or
fortune cookies") were posted. Do we really need another group? Why not
take over alt.motd, since it's empty (here), or include removing alt.motd
as part of your proposal (not that that will do a lot of good until some-
one gets Becker on a _real_ short leash).

	Terry Kennedy		Operations Manager, Academic Computing
	terry@spcvxa.bitnet	St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA
	terry@spcvxa.spc.edu	+1 201 915 9381
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: stamber@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Kevin L. Stamber)
Subject: Re: New group proposal:  alt.conservative.forum
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:07:25 GMT

In article <1gl52rINN4mf@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>, pearsodc@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU (if God's your father then call home!) writes:
> I would like to formally propose a new group, alt.conservative.forum, 
> a moderated group to discuss conservative values and assorted political
> goings-on from a distinctly right-wing standpoint.
> 
> Rationale:  Let's face it:  the net is infested with liberals.  I won't
> say this is either good or bad, but the fact is there.  Another fact:  
> some jerks with distinctly left-wing tendencies like to post to groups like
> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and post tons of gibberish about everything
> conservatives stand for, without factual defense of their positions.
> 
> A moderated group would cut out this gibberish and allow reasoned, intelligent
> discussion of the issues facing the country and the world.  Intelligent
> conservatives (and I will propose intelligent liberals as well, since, 
> contrary to popular conservative opinion, such animals do exist) will be
> encouraged to participate in our discussions.
> 
> Chuck Pearson
> clueless chuck		  
> pearsodc@rosevc.rose-hulman.edu      

     The question still remains:  will we invite people to be a part of this,
as the 'sleepy' Clinton did at his forum at the center of the Universe (Little
Rock), or will it be a forum open to all?
     I agree with you as to the current state of a.r-l and a.f.r-l; too many
people with single issues floating around in their cerebral cortex.  You know
what they say -- a little thought can be dangerous.  We must remember that we
are dealing with single issue people.  I see topics which I know I'm not going
to read (abortion, for example) which have literally taken on a life of their
own (small smiley here).                                        ^^^^
     Some of these topics were on the net when I began to read (A while ago.)
It's time for whoever's in charge of a.r-l and a.f.r-l to crack down on the
length of the debate of some 'issues' for the  sake of the reading public.

Thats my $0.01 (adjusted for Clinton tax increase on peoples' $0.02 worth).

Kevin L. Stamber
Purdue University
GOING HOME TOMORROW -- Hello, Pittsburgh!  
Have a happy non-denominational non-sectarian mid-winter holiday.

Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: roby@chopin.udel.edu (Scott W Roby)
Subject: Re: New group proposal: alt.conservative.forum
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 00:21:29 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.192317.24677@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes:
>In article <92351.120458KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>>>It still creates noise.  If we can have a moderated soc.feminism
>>>group, we can have a moderated group for conservatism.
>>Then we'd better call it 'soc.dittoheads'.  Same difference, right?
>
>The existence of flames like this when someone even _mentions_ conservatism
>is exactly why such a newsgroup is needed.

Flame?

"Dittoheads" is what many fans of Rush Limbaugh *call themselves*.
Why is that a flame?

"Feminazi" is a flame.  "Dittohead" may sound silly, but is not a flame 
by origin.  "Dittohead" is no more flammable than "conservative".

But don't worry, I *FEEL* your pain!, because I'm a liberal.  :-)

Maybe you should moderate the group so that all humor is censored, 
then even Rush couldn't post if he wanted to.  The conversation 
would go...
   "I believe this..."
   "Yeah, me, too!"
   "Me , also!"

Sounds like possibilities for great discussions to me...  :-)

I vote for democracy in action -- no moderation.



-- 
Scott W. Roby           *This sentence no verb.*      "No Matter where you go..
Phys.& Astr.Dept.    ///// / /  /  *|*  \  \ \ \\\\\      there you are!"
Univ.of Delaware    ((((( ( (  (  * + *  )  ) ) )))))   -> Buckaroo Banzai
roby@brahms.udel.edu \\\\\ \ \  \  *|*  /  / / /////   *Standard Disclaimer*
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: mcmahan@cs.unca.edu (Scott McMahan -- Genesis mailing list owner)
Subject: Proposal: alt.tv.saved.by.the.bell
Organization: University of North Carolina at Asheville
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 20:27:58 GMT

Well, there's alt.tv.90210 and alt.tv.fifteen, so I guess:

alt.tv.saved.by.the.bell

is the logical next step.

Is anyone besides me interested in it?

Scott

Newsgroups: alt.config