HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Thank You For clearing This UP for me....
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1992 01:00:40 GMT

coleman@rocky.cs.ucla.edu (Mike Coleman) writes:

] The idea that one should be single (whatever that means) to read or
] participate in soc.singles seems silly to me.  I read soc.singles, soc.women,
] alt.politics.bush, soc.motss, and alt.sex, but it certainly doesn't follow
] that I'm single, a woman, voting for the Shrub, gay, or getting any.  ;-)
] 
] Small minds may make assumptions, but who gives a shit?  Read/participate if
] you're *interested*...


Thank you1 Thank you! Thank you!

There for a while I was not sure
whether I could subscribe to 'alt.war'
or comp.sun.hardware......

I feel so much better now.....


ciao
drieux

ps: I'd always thought that soc.single was where folks
who did not have twins or clones went.....


-- 
Modern Day Problems:

ME? engage in Hyperbole?
I have rarely been more than a first Order Function!!!!
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: Re: Female geeks
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 23:44:59 GMT

In article 719105569@convex.convex.com, ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>
>You see, I warned you!  Next time, before you post something here,
>check with the soc.single political correctness committee, Nancy
>Colucci, chairman... er, chairwoman... chairhuman... chairhuperson...
>ehr, chairhuperoffspring (whew! :-), or her dancing chimp, Jimmy Dutton.
>


Namecalling Eddie? What happened to your sparkling eloquence?

Andreas.

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tang@akofin.enet.dec.com (Gabe Tang)
Subject: Re: SeesterSizeWars
Organization: the vms company
Distribution: na
Date: 14 OCT 92 13:38:36 EST


re: (rON.).......
>>>>Ah, I've still got you Allisson.  I've got three seesters!
>>>Hey!  I have *four* seesters!  What can I get for them, I wonder.
>>	Kayembee bids thirty quatloos.
>>	That's each, of course; I've seen their peektures.
> 
>Blowfish bids 100 quatloos for the lot and an additional 50 quatloos for the
>blue girl in the corner with the big eyes.

	Yes, but 500 quatloos if she is able to kill off the other 3......
	.......with her tongue! ;^)
From: sms@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (steven.m.stein)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Little Rock, ARKANSAS
Date: 9 Oct 92 02:48:25 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T


Well, the tickets have been purchased.  Off to Arkansas this Sunday
for three weeks.  Thanks to those of you who have responded with
things to do and places to go, especially Mike for those many 
suggestions and map.

Anyone else interested in getting together for a social drink and
conversation, send e-mail or call.  I'll enjoy the company.
I calculate an estimated 2,000 or so articles to skim through
when I get back.  Whewwwwwwwwwww.

						Steve
						w (609)639-2264
						h (215) 969-6604
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: BARBIE DOES IT AGAIN!!!!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 13:24:45 GMT

In article <Bvxw1A.KoL@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca> jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll) writes:
>In article <1992Oct9.191931.25643@sol.UVic.CA> atovorni@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>>
>>Here are my vues on the current schoolyard violence thread!
>>
>>  Why not think about Ghandi? Why not watch the film?
>>
>>  HE NEVER RESORTED TO VIOLENCE, JUST PEACEFUL RESISTANCE!!
>
>	He was also willing to accept causualties resisting the
>British. 
>
>	Peaceful resistance calls for potential sacrifices many 
>people are unwilling to risk,  especially if it is their offspring
>or dependents who are suffering.
>
>							James Nicoll
 
 While we're on the subject of Ghandi, Mattel said they only received a
handful of complaints and only one doll returned. FYO

 
================================================================================
 Ipsissimus of the Inner Order of Sesquipedalian Fruitcakes - IIOSF XOX Dawn
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: Re: Dating an older woman
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 92 02:31:32 GMT



  Your wit and eloquence amuse us, James. The Reagans and Imelda would
be honored to have Michelle as a guest.

  Thrashing that knave of a servant was the most posh thing to do, I
mean, Really! The Nerve of him! Due to the conditions in the Economy
(I despise "E" words, don't you?) I have been forced to dismiss my
staff(The old money has simply ran out!)  

  At least the LION and ZEBRA skin rugs that I shot on Safari in Kenya
are cleaner lately.

Give my Huzzahs to Muffy, see you at the hunt,

The Duke of Andyland.
From: wjb@moscom.com (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Humans as Physical Creatures.
Date: 13 Oct 92 13:19:09 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Distribution: na
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford NY
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.3 beta PL7]

H. Allisson Roome (allisson@turing.toronto.edu) wrote:
: 				I make wondful lasagna and stuffed shells
: 						- Allisson
: 
Well, then, you shoulda been in Toronto.  Actually, what we needed help
with was the garlic bread :-)
-- 
Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com
From: jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Ambiguities in the English language
Date: 13 Oct 92 23:39:28 GMT
Organization: Bear, Stearns & Co. - FAST


Greetings folks...

My recent post reminded me of something that has been bothering me
for a while -- some notable ambiguous terms which float around this
group quite a bit.

For example:

The Word	Primary Meaning			Alternate Meaning
========	===============			=================
relationship	similarly connected persons	persons who have sexual
		or things. (e.g. a friendship)	intercourse together

love (noun)	affection, or compassion	sexual passion or desire

love (verb) 	to have affection or		to desire a sexual
		compassion toward another	relationship with 
		person, or object.		another person

Clearly this is just the beginning...

Perhaps we need a few new words here to clear up the confusion...
Or perhaps we should be a little more careful about qualifying these
words when we use them...

Spidey!!!




--
 /\ \  / /\  Josh Diamond                                          jmd@bear.com
//\\ .. //\\ AKA Spidey!!!                        ...!ctr.columbia.edu!ursa!jmd
//\((  ))/\\
/  < `' >  \                                              Do whatever it takes.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: More on guys who aren't dating Ed Wright
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez
Distribution: soc
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 17:39:54 GMT

In article <JULIE.92Oct6143107@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu> julie@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu (Julie Wright) writes:
>
>	IMHO, "Wright" is a bad last name to have.
>	It's boring.
>	It starts with W, so you have to wait till the end of every
>alphabetical list.
>	Everyone thinks it begins with an R, even though there is no
>such last name, as far as I can tell.
>	But the most awful thing about it -- the very WORST -- is that
>it lends itself to name jokes.  I hate it when that happens.
>
>---Julie (no relation)
>"Your last name is spelt W-R-I-G-H-T?" "That's ri -- uh, correct."...

Don't worry, as long as you keep posting with witty comments, we won't
make fun of your name.  Well, most of us won't......  ;-)
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Who needs Lime Jello [tm]?  We had lasagna.....
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: Re: On Handshaking in General
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 92 01:56:04 GMT

In article 15023@auspex-gw.auspex.com, johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <1992Oct14.211712.6602@sol.UVic.CA> atovorni@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>|If you shake hands with anybody in my family, you must stare at them in
>|the eyes so that they can tell you're sincere. It's a custom from the
>|old country and a sign of respect. Give a good, firm grip, but don't 
>|cut off circulation to the fingertips.
>
>Which old country would that be?  The description sounds a bit like the
>demonstration of the proper "skoal" technique as shown by Max Von Sydow
>in a Scandinavian cookbook that I have.  
>
>First raise your beverage (aquavit where the beverage of choice in this
>case) to about chest level.  Stare into the eyes of your drinking companion
>for a few seconds, then raise the glass to your lips and tip your head back
>finishing the shot in one swallow.  Then lower the glass back the original
>position, repeat the gaze and nod.
>

Wrong part of Europe, Same Idea. My folks are from the south of Austria
and the north of what once was Yugoslavia (now Slovenia). The tradition
ranges through all Scandinavian/Teutonic/Slavic cultures, I believe. 
Works for me, and shows respect.

Andreas.
From: pdsmith@bbn.com (Peter D. Smith)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: WANTED WOMAN 27 +
Keywords: Mature, sincere funloving **W 27+ wanted
Date: 14 Oct 92 21:33:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.ldp4gnINNjo4
Reply-To: pdsmith@spca.bbn.com (Peter D. Smith)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

In article <1992Oct14.150058.7300@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
>stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>>You know you've been reading the net too long when you blink at a post like
>>this several times and you keep seeing: I am looking for a mature worm.
>
>hymowitz@whatever.cs.jhu.edu (Hymie!) replies:
>>at this point in time, i'd /take/ a mature worm... *sigh*
>
>Fishing for a relationship?

I'd guess it's a line.  No complaints, though -- I'll let someone else
cast first.


				Peter D. Smith

DoD#6260 - Not usually quick with puns, but these were easy.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Dating an older woman
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 15:21:21 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.023132.19985@sol.UVic.CA> atovorni@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>
>
>  Your wit and eloquence amuse us, James. The Reagans and Imelda would
>be honored to have Michelle as a guest.
>
>  Thrashing that knave of a servant was the most posh thing to do, I
>mean, Really! The Nerve of him! Due to the conditions in the Economy
>(I despise "E" words, don't you?) I have been forced to dismiss my
>staff(The old money has simply ran out!)  
>
>  At least the LION and ZEBRA skin rugs that I shot on Safari in Kenya
>are cleaner lately.
>
>Give my Huzzahs to Muffy, see you at the hunt,
>
>The Duke of Andyland.
>
 
Good show ol rot. Tally ho.

 
================================================================================
 Ipsissimus of the Inner Order of Sesquipedalian Fruitcakes - IIOSF XOX Dawn
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Farewell all.
Date: 12 Oct 92 23:59:02 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <4072@cvbnetPrime.COM> bmeyer@feds12.prime.com (Bob Meyer) writes:
>In article <1992Oct8.205557.17438@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
||> In article <1992Oct8.142018.10264@bsu-ucs.uucp> 01ksdavis@bsu-ucs.uucp (Rebel without a clue.) writes:
||> >-- 
||> >
||> >	Just letting everybody else in the newsgroup that I will no longer be
||> >in this newsgroup.  Not even as a lurker as of something that has recently 
||> >happened to me.
||> >
||> >	So, look for me in either alt.romance from now on, or even soc.couples.

Translation: Kyle has found a romantic interest and assumes that he can no
longer post to soc.singles.

||> >	Keep smiling everybody.
||> >	Kyle
||>  
||> Bwah Bwa Bwa. Bwa Bwa Bwa.
||> Bwa bwabwa. Bwa bwabwa. Bwa bwabwaaaaaa
||> Bwa bwa bwa bwabwabwaaaaaaa

Translation: James thinks that the romantic interest is a girl named
Barbara, and sensitive guy that he is, attempts to sing his rendition
of "Barbara Ann" as a tribute, but has forgotten the words.

|   Don't worry ... he'll be back!  ;-)

Translation:  Bob, Kyles real romantic interest, thinks Kyle is two-timing
him, and is about to dump the bitch.  
-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira     | Auspex Systems | "Auspex does not share my opinions.  |
| johnf@auspex.com | Santa Clara CA |  So Why am I still working here?"    |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll)
Subject: Re: Humans as Physical Creatures.
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 04:26:20 GMT

In article <Bvp497.10z@access.digex.com> huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston) writes:
>In article <BvnM7F.Eqv@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca> jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll) writes:
>
>>	Ever notice how lousy the lifestyle of males  is in many other
>>species? Thank god the sexual dimorphism in humans is (Under many modes
>>of post-agricultural culture) in the males' favour: I *could* have been 
>>a male spider, or one of those fish who fertilise their sisters and die,
>>prior to birth.
>
>Sorry if I'm bursting your bubble, but the degree of human sexual dimorphism
>seems to have been on the decline.  Although for most mammals males are
>bigger than females, the blue whales being an exception, the females tend
>to live longer on average.  The sex life of the male praying mantis certainly
>doesn't seem appealing, but at least the female's biting off his head first
>seems to improve his copulatory performance.

	I'm sure that comes as a great comfort to him. I'll stick
with the human mating schemes, thanks.

							James Nicoll
Xref: sparky soc.singles:27465 alt.romance:12469 alt.romance.chat:19284
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat
Subject: Re: How long has it been?
Date: 10 Oct 92 20:55:33 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <1992Oct6.174335.23415@fid.morgan.com> sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
>In article <1992Oct6.134605.16183@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
>mneeley@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark Neeley) writes:
>>How long has it been since you were kissed by a member of
>>
>>	Mark (almost a year)
>
>5.5 hours.
>
>(And I'm sure there'll be somebody posting from home while they're
>kissing, just to annoy you.)

Yup, some of us are sufficiently good at typing to do this.  We've been
kissing continuously forthe last two minutes.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Who needs Lime Jello [tm]?  We had lasagna.....
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Humans as Physical Creatures.
Date: 13 Oct 92 00:26:32 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

kimnach@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (GREG KIMNACH) writes:

>In article <1akd4sINNss@uwm.edu>, markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes...
>>Cro-Magnons were 100% human.  Neanderthals were human too.  They coexisted.
>>Cro-Magnons never died out.  You're probably a descendant.  Neanderthals were
>>the ones that died off, were killed off, or were reassimilated.

>"We are Cro-Magnon.  We shall assimilate you.  Resistance is futile.  We 
>are Cro-Magnon." 

I think it probably went something more like: "Hey baby, want to come back
to my cave for a little bouncy-bouncy?"

--
Stef                           Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...
stef@apple.com                                         
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.politics.homosexuality,talk.bizarre
From: kkwwkk@mixcom.com (TA Shaw)
Subject: Re: Ok, Lets Do it Right the First time
Organization: Milwaukee Internet Xchange BBS, Milwaukee, WI U.S.A.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 15:57:04 GMT


drieux asks:

Now the Important Sub_text Question:
 
was he referring to a:


1. platonic kiss

2. aristitilian kiss

3. Hegelian Kiss

4. Witgenstinian Kiss...

5. Godelian Kiss


The answer may be an unequivical YES. 


Sub_text_Question II

Is there a Systemic Difference in the Nuerological Data Derived from:

1. a Non_Platonic Kiss Between Members of the Same Gender
With or without facial hair?
 
2. a Platonic Kiss between Members of Differing Genders
With or without facial hair?

3. A Godelian Kiss of a member of the Class of Schrodinger Felinus Domesticatus
Yes.  I believe Schroeder was a of the Beethovenian Class, therefore may not
have heard about the Domestico del Gatito.

4. A Neo_Platonic Kiss Between Members of Differing Religions
Does this assume that the differing religions are valid and practical?  If so
the platonic, let alone neo_platonic, kiss would provide unique sensory
data.

5. A Hegelian Kiss between Members of Opposing Ontological Theory Supporters.
Actually I've seen Helga and most people would not dare oppose her....

BDC
-- 
   "Life is a highway, I want to drive it all night long" 
    Tom Cochrane 
    1983 750 Maximum
    kkwwkk@mixcom.com                 shaw@mixcom.com
Xref: sparky soc.singles:27555 alt.romance:12541 alt.romance.chat:19324 talk.bizarre:33856
From: soconnor@ziff.com
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: How long has it been?
Date: 12 Oct 92 19:31:15 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Ziff-Davis, Medford MA


In article <aland.718659016@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu>, aland@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Alan D.) writes:
> dayrton@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:
> 
>>In article <1992Oct6.134605.16183@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, mneeley@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark Neeley) writes:
>>> How long has it been since you were kissed by a member of
>>> the opposite sex?
>>> 
>>> 	Mark (almost a year)
> 
>>Oh....about 20 minutes....  <big happy grin>
> 
> Far too long...  My girlfriend's been sick forever (it seems) and
> doesn't want to give me the cold... ;(
> 
> 	-=Alan

Kissing was (and always will be..:)) the best way I caught a cold..

In my case, it has been 16 hours since I was kissed...:(  And it 
probably wont happen again until the weekend...:)  (that's what I
get for having a conflicting schedule w/ my RP)

Shannon
From: rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Humans as Physical Creatures.
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 92 21:13:14 MDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Wild Rose Refugee Camp

wjb@moscom.com (Bill de Beaubien) writes:
>Charles R. Martin (martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu) wrote:
>: And how narrowly can we identify the
>: "date" on which the Neanderthals disappeared?
>July 18th, 39736 B.C.  Any other questions?

Yes...was it "dinner and a movie"? out for a drink and my-place-or-yours?
I've been on some dates that didn't go very well, but extinction seems
a bit extreme, don't you think?

-- Ray
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: What ever happened to...
Date: 12 Oct 92 22:55:15 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

What ever happened to that woman with the iguana and the Billy Idol listening
boyfriend?  I figured she might have something to contribute to the strange
hobbies thread.
-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira     | Auspex Systems | "Auspex does not share my opinions.  |
| johnf@auspex.com | Santa Clara CA |  So Why am I still working here?"    |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: Eddie's really back.
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 16 Oct 92 17:20:39 GMT

In article <1992Oct16.013315.1351@sol.UVic.CA> atovorni@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>Foxtrot-Uniform-Charlie-KILL  Omega-Foxtrot-Foxtrot

You're close, but K->Kilo and O->Oscar.

I've found that there are problems being a pilot and also enjoying
fantasy stories:
	"Tower, this is Alpha Oscar Unicorn ..."

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
From: mike.mcaulay@spacebbs.com (Mike Mcaulay) 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: relationship gone to pot?
Date: 9 Oct 92 19:41:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: SPACE BBS - Menlo Park, CA - 10 Lines + 4gB - 415-323-4193
Reply-To: mike.mcaulay@spacebbs.com (Mike Mcaulay) 


shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller) writes:

-> >The pot-smoking ex-SO mentioned in the original post may in fact be
-> a >totally weed-befuddled, going-nowhere-fast loser-type for all I
-> know. >But maybe not, and in general we can't assume that the
-> ultimate be-all >and end-all for every member of our species is to at
-> all times be in a >"primary relationship" to which all other
-> interests and proclivities are >secondary.  Possibly the dude in
-> question just got bored with the >relationship and decided to get
-> baked for a while.

-> How nice of him to act in an obnoxious manner towards his girlfriend.

Is it "obnoxious" to withdraw affection from an SO?  From the SO's
perspective it certainly represents an unfortunate set of circumstances,
but I think "obnoxious" is too strong.

-> After all, if he's bored, why not just dump the bitch? Better still,
-> *don't* dump the bitch - leave her hung out to dry in case he has a
-> use for her later.  After all, he might run out of pot, and having
-> her around is better than staring at the walls waiting for the next
-> delivery.

Are you interested in discussing this?  Putting this sort of spin on
what I've written is not really conducive to advancing the
conversation.  I agree that it is not a Good Thing for someone to grow
bored with a relationship without breaking it off.  But we are talking
about a hypothetical situation here and it's not really fair of you to
particularize it like you have.

-> I don't think the be-all and end-all is to be in a primary
-> relationship. I *do* think that, if 2 people have a relationship,
-> that they each deserve to be treated with respect and decency by the
-> other half.

If you can show that I have stated anything to the contrary I will eat
my hat.  In fact, I will eat a 10 gallon hat full of cow poop at the
next boink held within 100 miles of my house.

-> I don't think that indulging oneself in a compulsive behavior to the
-> point of neglecting the other person is respectful or decent. Sorry.

Ranting.

-> If you want to revel in an addiction, knock yourself out.

Ad hominem attack.

-> I just don't think it's appropriate to hurt anyone else while doing
-> it, even if it's "just" through neglect.

Me either.  Okay my point was:  I do not accept that it is necessarily
the case that everyone should at all times place a "primary
relationship" above all else, including what you have derogatorily
referred to as "addictions."  If you are touchy about pot, then let's
stick to something else, say, birdwatching.

M.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: wanted straight female
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 7 Oct 92 18:32:31 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.123700.1@opie.bgsu.edu> tb205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:
>... All i want is a straight female ...

Personally, I prefer my females somewhat curvy.  But to each his own.

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
Xref: sparky soc.singles:27478 alt.sex:32613 talk.abortion:41919