HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pierce@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (Brad Pierce)
Subject: Conspiracy books
Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 00:04:32 GMT

Are any of these books worth reading?

    _Architects of conspiracy : an intriguing history_ by William P.
    Hoar, (Boston : Western Islands), 1984.

    _Architects of fear : conspiracy theories and paranoia in American
    politics_ by George Johnson, (Los Angeles : J.P. Tarcher), 1983.

    _Conspiracies, cover-ups, and crimes : political manipulation and
    mind control in America_  by Jonathan Vankin, (New York : Paragon
    House), 1991.

-- Brad Pierce --
From: nmiller@starbase.trincoll.edu (norman miller)
Subject: Re: What the Trilateralists truly intend
Organization: Trinity College, Hartford, CT.
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:42:54 GMT

In article <1jtmfgINNs3m@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> aq817@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steve Crocker) writes:
>
>You should be aware that allegations of causality which
>suggest a CAUSAL MECHANISM are not legitimately dissmissed as though their
>only support were correlation and time sequence. The suggested mechanism 
>may be IMPLAUSIBLE, but the responsible critic should not dismiss it as though
>it had not been suggested. He or she should properly attempt to SHOW that it 
>is implausible.

Question: why is it up to the "responsible critic" to
do the work of testing a proposal, especially one
which its defenders themselves label "implausible"?
From: library@comlab.ox.ac.uk (Gordon Riddell)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,uk.politics
Subject: Re: Norman Lamont, his flexible friend, and Miss Whiplash
Date: 21 Jan 93 10:27:01 GMT
Distribution: uk
Organization: Oxford University Computing Laboratory, UK
Originator: library@merlin.comlab

In article <930120.155234.5Y8.rusnews.w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes:
>
>But interestingly, Ms St Clair recently claimed (according to Ceefax) that
>she had a "dirt file" detailing famous people who have been clients of
>prostitutes, and that she was prepared to reveal this information to protest
>about a huge tax bill she had been sent.
>
>And now she's missing.  It all sounds very odd.  Does anyone know what's going
>on?


Yes, Normie's Miss Whiplash is a different one to Lindi St. Clair. I once read
part of her "autobiography" (someone donated it as a raffle prize for a raffle
I was organising!) and she went on at length, so to speak, about the MPs and
Cabinet ministers and Peers who availed themselves of her services. She did
say she'd never reveal who her little darlings were. However it is
the Inland Revenue who wish to grab a great deal of back tax (yes, on her
immoral earnings). I'd bet she's done a bunk even though she did threaten
to grass.

It does strike me as contradictory that someone can legally not earn money
from
prostitution, but when they do they have to pay tax on it!

Gordon
From: aq817@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steve Crocker)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: Yale Law One-World Government?
Date: 22 Jan 1993 08:52:51 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Well, Ted, my proposed solution is to expose the existence and
relationships of these people, develop appropriate criticisms of
their policies, organize politically, and use the democratic
mechanisms to remove them from power. If democratic mechanisms
become fatally compromised, then extra-legal means might become
necessary. At this point, there is still a great deal which can
be done using the rights guaranteed to us under the Constitution.

-Steve
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.activism,alt.society.civil-liberty,alt.individualism,alt.censorship,misc.headlines,soc.culture.usa,misc.activism.progressive
From: pierce@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (Brad Pierce)
Subject: Re: Is something going on here??
Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 02:31:45 GMT

In article <C188I6.H07@demon.co.uk> gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal) writes:
>Well, GCHQ *did* join the internet two days ago.

Who is GCHQ?

-- Brad Pierce --

Newsgroups: uk.politics,alt.conspiracy
From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Norman Lamont, his flexible friend, and Miss Whiplash
Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
Distribution: uk
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 11:40:23 GMT

In article <930120.155234.5Y8.rusnews.w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
:mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
:> Now (according to Ceefax) Miss Whiplash has gone missing.  Her car has been
:> found abandoned near Beachy Head, and Police have started a missing persons
:> investigation.  Entirely unconnected with the embarrassment she caused Mr
:> Lamont, of course.
:
:Further investigation suggests that this might be a different "Miss Whiplash"
:from the one who rented Lamont's flat; this "Miss Whiplash" is Lindi St Clair
:of the Corrective Party.

(ahem) Correct.  Actually, I was surprised that during the Norman stories
that none of the press pointed this out; you'd think they knew Lindi well
enough by now...  (she's quite (ahem) big over here)

:But interestingly, Ms St Clair recently claimed (according to Ceefax) that
:she had a "dirt file" detailing famous people who have been clients of
:prostitutes, and that she was prepared to reveal this information to protest
:about a huge tax bill she had been sent.
:
:And now she's missing.  It all sounds very odd.  Does anyone know what's going
:on?

My bet is she'll turn up soon and make loadsa bucks selling her story to
the tabloids.  I doubt very much she's been done away with by MI5, worried
about the collapse of parliament.  She always swore again and again that
she'd never dish the dirt, and she'd be out of business for good if she
did.  It's a publicity stunt I reckon.

G
Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:14738 soc.culture.african.american:14409
From: cortese@skid.ps.uci.edu (Janis Maria Cortese)
Subject: Re: Masons
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,soc.culture.african.american
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 27 Jan 93 00:17:23 GMT

In article <Lm0ZXB1w165w@status.gen.nz> jonc@status.gen.nz (Jon Clarke) writes:
>Timothy.J.Young@dartmouth.edu (Timothy J. Young) writes:
>
>> My two cents about this :
>> 
>> Any society this large and this secret (i.e. Masons) is bound to be
>> filled with corruption. This applies to any organization, especially
>> the Catholic Church, the world's #1 source of sexism and homophobia.  
>> Quote : "Never trust any group of people larger than a squad."
>> 
> 
> Tim,
> 
> I have to agree about the Catholic Church but I sorely disagree about
> the masons.  While we hear almost monthly about some priest gone astray
> in one wicked way or other we are lucky to hear each decade about 
> about the masonic fraternity.

Only because the Masons are more secretive about their numbers.  I'm not
saying they ARE corrupt, only pointing this out.  Even the catholic
church was not thought to be corrupt or include any child-molesteing
priests, either, before such things came outinto the open.

Regards,
Janis C.
From: godfrey@vxdesy.desy.de
Subject: Re: Part 11,  Within America's Soul, Hitler is Victorious
Followup-To:  alt.conspiracy
Organization: (DESY, Hamburg, Germany)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 13:50:30 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.000619.10295@mont.cs.missouri.edu>, jad@hopper.ACS.Virginia.EDU (John DiNardo) writes:

Hmm.  Much as I despise the Saddam administration I see that there is a
great deal of truth in the text of this mail.  You can put me on the mailing
list in future.  But skip the stuff that supports Saddam himself - it's
garbage.

Laurence
From: cj195@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John W. Redelfs)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: Report on Gritz from Idaho
Date: 25 Jan 1993 07:56:21 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: cj195@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John W. Redelfs)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank) says:

>Because attacking "Jewish bankers" is *not* criticizing the
>Federal Reserve Board.  Calling for overthrow of "the Zionists who've 
>taken over the government from Christians" is *not* criticizing "the 
>New World Order."
>
>When people have noted these anti-Semitic statements by Gritz,
>we've been repeatedly told that he was *really* criticizing the
>Fed, or the NWO.  When he wasn't.  Hence the use of the term
>"code words."

Ted, help me out here.  I don't want to be thought an anti-Semite
because I am actually very pro-Jewish.  But I believe there is a
sinister secret society trying to set up a global dictatorship with
members of all races, religions and cultural backgrounds.  I further
believe that many members of this secret society hold concurrent
membership in the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral
Commission.  I believe that the phrase New World Order is one of the
words that George Bush used during the Gulf War to refer to this
emerging world government under the United Nations.  I also believe that
George Bush and many of his friends belong to this secret society.

Now what words should I use to explain these beliefs without marking
myself falsely as an anti-Semite.  I don't want to use any of these
"code words" you speak of.  Perhaps you could suggest some other words?

-- 


--------- All my opinions are tentative pending further data. ---------
------------ John W. Redelfs, cj195@cleveland.Freenet.edu -------------
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
Subject: Re: Repost: "The Insiders" part 3 of 4
Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 01:00:07 GMT

In article <1jkn1jINNkn3@im4u.cs.utexas.edu> lwb@cs.utexas.edu (Lance W. Bledsoe) writes:
>In article <1993Jan19.184001.29672@midway.uchicago.edu> thf2@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>>Didn't you just post this nonsense a week ago?
>>
>>If you bother to *read* the Sidney Blumenthal article, it's fairly
>>clear that he's being ironic.
>
>Didn't *YOU* just post *THIS* nonsense a week ago?

Truth isn't nonsense.  It's a crucial distinction which it would behoove 
you to learn.
-- 
ted frank                     | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu 
standard disclaimers          | void where prohibited
the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: bil@okcforum.osrhe.uoknor.edu (Bill Conner)
Subject: Foucault
Organization: Okcforum Unix Users Group
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 07:54:14 GMT


   Hey, I love a good conspiracy, especially when someone really
believes it. I can recommend a couple of neat conspiracy books
(they're even in paper-back):

Holy Blood, Holy Grail
and
Foucault's Pendulum, by Umberto Eco

These are fascinating books. The first is supposed to be non-fiction,
but who can tell (it was written in part by a Frenchman after all).
The second is fiction but is outstanding. Umberto Eco (or his
translator) is el primo. I especially enjoyed his loving aside about a
word processor (even though it was running on a Apple of all things).

Dig conspiracies? Get these backs at least ...


Bill
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: "alex bosika" <alex.bosika@canrem.com>
Subject: u: cfr and all this stuff
Reply-To: "alex bosika" <alex.bosika@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: alt
Date: 25 Jan 93 08:21:13 EST

 Hello everyone. I am a new participant on this feed. I have been
 interested at the kind of messages on here. But I am a skeptic. But
 I do wonder sometimes.

 I have always wondered what that pyramid on the back of the US dollar
 meant. Mind you, in the Economist about 4 weeks ago, they had a
 listing for all these "influential" organizations in the world and
 so on, and ranked them.

 What is this CFR? What does it stand for? I heard that it has
 2000 members and that there is a list? As I am skeptical, I would
 like to see this 2000 member list. This TC...is this the Trilateral
 Commission? Why TRIlateral and not UNIlateral? Is it not in the
 interests of the USA? Hmm...answers please. A lot of this is
 vague and I need some fact to understand it.

 But the fact that a nice magazine like the Economist listed these
 influential organizations like this CFR, the TC, this net and so
 on, makes it all kind of....real?

 Thank you.

 I am only a curious bystander but the discussions are interesting. I
 am not too involved in these issues as they rarely interest me, and
 I don't like lead.
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: harry@hershele.alf.dec.com (Harry Katz)
Subject: Re: (no subject given)
Followup-To: alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization: DEC - Customer Support Center, Alpharetta, GA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:43:52 GMT

In article <C17rpI.GFJ@news.cso.uiuc.edu>,
vengeanc@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu wrote:

	Here's the situation.  Rush is an ENTERTAINER first and
	foremost.  He is not a journalist, reporter, or Geraldo Rivera.

If Rush is not a journalist or a reporter then he must be a "Geraldo
Rivera," that is, an entertainer posing as a reporter.


	He can do anything he wants to keep the show moving and
	interesting.  He has no obligation to let anyone say anything!
	He openly admits this, and callers therefore have no excuse
	for not knowing this when they call.  

Unfortunately, many of his supporters on this net do not know this fact
and it colors their perception of the man and his ideas.

Harry Katz
From: aq817@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steve Crocker)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: Yale Law One-World Government?
Date: 22 Jan 93 08:48:39 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Clinton appears to have acheived his position largely by making
connections with the "right" people. PBS had a special on the
sources of his campaign funding, which were heavily oriented 
toward Wall Street and a small circle of Democratic millionaires.
Contrast this with Lincoln's case.

-Steve
Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:14691 soc.culture.african.american:14372
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,soc.culture.african.american
Subject: Re: Masons
From: jonc@status.gen.nz (Jon Clarke)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 23:28:11 GMT
Organization: The CServer at the Z*NET International Global News Gateway

cortese@skid.ps.uci.edu (Janis Maria Cortese) writes:

> In article <Lm0ZXB1w165w@status.gen.nz> jonc@status.gen.nz (Jon Clarke) write
> >Timothy.J.Young@dartmouth.edu (Timothy J. Young) writes:
> >
> >> My two cents about this :
> >> 
> >> Any society this large and this secret (i.e. Masons) is bound to be
> >> filled with corruption. This applies to any organization, especially
> >> the Catholic Church, the world's #1 source of sexism and homophobia.  
> >> Quote : "Never trust any group of people larger than a squad."
> >> 
> > 
> > Tim,
> > 
> > I have to agree about the Catholic Church but I sorely disagree about
> > the masons.  While we hear almost monthly about some priest gone astray
> > in one wicked way or other we are lucky to hear each decade about 
> > about the masonic fraternity.
> 
> Only because the Masons are more secretive about their numbers.  I'm not
> saying they ARE corrupt, only pointing this out.  Even the catholic
> church was not thought to be corrupt or include any child-molesteing
> priests, either, before such things came outinto the open.
> 
 
 Point taken but I suggest the the numbers are not secret as you say
 they are. If you take the time and ask your Grand Lodge in your state
 or country I am sure they will tell you how many there are.
 
---
"Yes Fred, the new Lodge in Belfast is called 'The Son's of Casey' tis
 with out a word of a lie me son"
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.activism,alt.society.civil-liberty,alt.individualism,alt.censorship,misc.headlines,soc.culture.usa,alt.activism.d
From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Watergate/Deep Throat
Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
Distribution: alt.conspiracy
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 11:47:35 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.004452.8475@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> mswihart@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Michael R Swihart) writes:
:Does anyone have any idea on who Deep Throut, the informant 
:for the Washington Post in the Watergate investigation, really was?

Clue: who *she* really was...

(My lips are sealed ;-) )

G

Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
Subject: Re: Conspiracy books
Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:48:08 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.000432.428@cs.ucla.edu> pierce@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (Brad Pierce) writes:
>Are any of these books worth reading?
>
>    _Architects of conspiracy : an intriguing history_ by William P.
>    Hoar, (Boston : Western Islands), 1984.
>
>    _Architects of fear : conspiracy theories and paranoia in American
>    politics_ by George Johnson, (Los Angeles : J.P. Tarcher), 1983.
>
>    _Conspiracies, cover-ups, and crimes : political manipulation and
>    mind control in America_  by Jonathan Vankin, (New York : Paragon
>    House), 1991.

Dunno, but I recommend Hofstadter's "The Paranoid Style in American
Politics."
-- 
ted frank                     | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu 
standard disclaimers          | void where prohibited
the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
From: jack@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Jack Campin)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: PREVAILING WINDS RESEARCH: The Secret Treaty of Fort Hunt
Date: 26 Jan 93 20:34:39 GMT
Reply-To: jack@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Jack Campin)
Organization: COMANDOS Project, Glesga Yoonie

eriks@lin.foa.se (Erik Svensson FOA2) wrote:
> jad@hopper.ACS.Virginia.EDU (John DiNardo) writes:
>> From Prevailing Winds Research, Reprint #003 :
>> This article from "Covert Action [Information Bulletin]" tells the story
>> of ODESSA and it's relationship to Reinhard Gehlen's spy organization 
>> which formed the basis of our modern Central Intelligence Agency and
>> National Security Council.  "The unconditional surrender that the Germans
>> made to the Allied Command at the little red schoolhouse in Reims was the
>> surrender only of the German Armed Services. It was NOT the surrender of
>> the hard SS core of the Nazi Party. The SS did not surrender, uncondition-
>> -ally or otherwise, and thus, Naziism itself did not surrender. The SS
>> chose, rather, to seek other means of continuing the war 
> I've had it with this kind of bull. All armed units of SS did at this
> point in time belong to Waffen SS (Himmler wanted the biggest SS possible.).

Gehlen's organization was the spy network in the East; spies aren't generally
part of armed units, are they?...


> All Waffen SS units were under Wehrmacht control and their surrender were
> part of the Wehrmacht's surrender.

...so that is not particularly relevant to the issue at hand.

-- 
--  Jack Campin    room G092, Computing Science Department, Glasgow University,
17 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, Scotland   TEL: 041 339 8855 x6854 (work)
INTERNET: jack@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk or via nsfnet-relay.ac.uk    FAX: 041 330 4913
BANG!net: via mcsun and uknet     BITNET: via UKACRL    UUCP: jack@glasgow.uucp
From: lwb@cs.utexas.edu (Lance W. Bledsoe)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: REPLY: CFR/Trilaterals in Clinton Administration
Date: 28 Jan 1993 10:40:11 -0600
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: im4u.cs.utexas.edu

In article <1k702kINN7h1@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cj195@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John W. Redelfs) writes:
>
>THE NEW AMERICAN is the official publication of the John Birch Society,
>the premiere anti-communist organization in the United States since the
>late 1950s.  It is published bi-weekly.

Just to clarify a little (I'm sure my friend John will understand).  
The New American IS NOT the official publication of the John Birch Society,
the JBS Bulletin is.  The NA is published on the same presses that are
used by Western Islands press, but articles in the NA don't 
necessarily represent the views of the JBS (but the usually do).

Lance

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Lance W. Bledsoe        lwb@im4u.cs.utexas.edu        (512) 258-0112  |
|  "Ye shall know the TRUTH, and the TRUTH shall make you free."         |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: v140pxgt@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Daniel B Case)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.news-media
Subject: Re: Time-Warner, Channel One and the "Edison Project"
Date: 27 Jan 93 23:40:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1993Jan27.124752.564@hsh.com>, paul@hsh.com writes...

[stuff deleted]
>> Cohen also notes that as a result of the merger, the company now
>> both owns cable stations and distributors and produces the product
>> that will get on the air; Time Warner also owns magazines that review
>> movies and televisions shows that it produces.  Cohen cites a Time cover
>> story on author Scott Turow which ran just as Warner released a movie
>> based on a Turow novel.
> 
>So?  It's called "cross-marketing," and it's neither illegal nor unethical.
>One wonders what ideological niche Cohem would slide this Turow fellow into.
>I never heard of him myself, but I'd bet a buck on it.
>

Scott Turow? The author of Presumed Innocent and The Burden of Proof, whose
runaway success started the current vogue for legal thrillers like The Firm?
Gee, I love the way conservatives are *so* plugged into the cultural mainstream
As William F. Buckley admitted last year "I have never seen a baseball game, or
watched a single episode of that show hosted by that young black woman who is 
alternately fat and thin, I forget her name" (and FWIW, Dan Quayle hadn't 
watched a single episode of Murphy Brown-someone on his staff had). No wonder
the harsh reaction to the "family 'values'" rhetoric at the Republican 
covention put so many of them at a loss-in November.

>[ snip, snip, snip; I don't have all day]
> 
>If FAIR really did stand for "fairness" and "accuracy," they'd be asking why 
>the media gave Clinton's cabinet nominees such a free ride.  Why aren't we 
>told more about Christopher Warren, who lied to Congress?  What was the 
>secret deal Ron Brown cut, in order to save his confirmation?

Uh, that's *Warren Christopher*. If one presumes to be a media critic, one 
should evince some sign of being familiar with it and the messages it conveys.

> 
>------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ 
> 
>Paul Havemann   (Internet: paul@hsh.com)
> 
>   * They're not just opinions -- they're caffeine for the brain! *
>         ** (Up to 50 milligrams per cynical observation.) **
Organization: Freshman, CIT general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 13:05:48 -0500 
From: "D. Andrew Byler" <db7n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Pope John Paul II

>Is it true that Pope John Paul II once worked for the
>I.G. Farben Chemical Company that sold cyanide and other 
>poisonous gases (Zyklon B, Malathion) to the Nazis in the
>1940's.

Probably not.

1) I.G. Farben was a creation of the Nazi's through merger's in the
Chemical Industry.
2) The Nazi's only invaded Poland in Spet. 1939.
3) Pope John Paul II was in Poland his whole life until he became a Cardinal.
4) He has been a Priest, and before that a seminarian from when he got
out of college I believe.
5) Thus, it's quite unlikely that he worked for I.G. Farben.  This is
simply another attack on the Catholic Church made without any basis at
all.

Andy Byler

Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Document puts Bush 'in the loop' on Iran-Contra
Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 02:57:40 GMT

In article <1k96i0INNco1@bigboote.WPI.EDU> mfriley@pacman.WPI.EDU (Margaret F Riley) writes:
:In article <9301251956.AA21278@pizzabox.demon.co.uk> gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal) writes:
:>Hey, does this mean he *lied* to you folks?  Tsk tsk...
:You might have noticed he is no longer the President.

All the easier to put him in jail for lying to Congress then?

G
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy