HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kkruse@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Korey J. Kruse)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Subject: Re: compiler
Date: 9 Apr 1992 17:18:28 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

In article <92100.140321U56673@uicvm.uic.edu> <U56673@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:
>I am new to rexx, however, all this talk about rexx compilers got me interested
>... where can i get one?  If someone out there has one would they be kind enoug
>h to send it to me (or tell me where to get one).
>                                thanks,
>                                     brian
>                                        u56673@uicvm.cc.uic.edu
The only TRUE rexx compiler you'll have to pay for.   IBM sells the
software.   I believe there may be (emphasis here) a simple rexx
compiler available on the vm tools or vm workshop tapes available via
anonymous ftp from KSUVM.KSU.EDU.   BEWARE!!!  Directories are huge...
and I wouldn't recommend looking for this unless you have a free hour
or two.   I believe their is even an "un-compiler" available for the
compiler they give you called "FIXXREXX" or something like that.
This does NOT work on IBM Compiled Rexx...
--
    _   _   _                _       _   _    kkruse@ksuvm.bitnet
|/ | | |_) |_ \ /     |  |/ |_) | | (_` |_    kkruse@ksuvm.ksu.edu
|\ |_| | \ |_  |    (_|  |\ | \ |_| ._) |_    kkruse@matt.ksu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:18:25 CST
From:         Darknight <ST9596@SIUCVMB.BITNET>
Subject:      EXEC2 Query

    Good day.  I am seeking advice for a program written in the language
EXEC2.  I was wondering if anyone knows of a proper forum to ask this
question, or if any of the programmers here would lend me a hand.  Thanks
alot for your time and patience, and sorry for the non-REXX post.



GW"Darknight"Bondy
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 15:57:51 CST
From:         Jim Colten <IJIM@UMINN1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: IBM REXX Compiler
              8 Apr 1992 10:33:40 MST from <62623@UCDASVM1.ADMIN.UCALGARY.CA>

On Wed, 8 Apr 1992 10:33:40 MST Don Barker said:
>FROM: Don Barker
>      Administrative Systems         The University of Calgary
>      Phone (403) 220-5441           Fax (403) 282-9361
>   We recently started using the REXX Compiler. We had hoped that the
>compiled execs would run faster and use less resources.
>   Unfortunately the compiled programs were two to five times the size
>of the original execs. The working set size of the users increased and
>our system started to page to death.
>   My questions are
>   1 - What execs would you recommend that we compile (if any)?

Those that contibute heavily to total CPU usage.

>   2 - Where do you expect to see a noticeable benefit?

Those that spend more of their time doing REXX logic, not host commands.

>   3 - What compiled execs should be loaded into the DCSS?

Those most frequently used by more than a few users.

>   4 - Should I forget the whole idea and curse IBM's name?

Depends on whether or not you find enough EXECs that fit the answers to
questions 1-3.

Evaluate your expectations.  I know of a big PROFS shop that has fronted PROFS
with some big hairy EXECs/XEDITs.  They got the REXX compiler (big $$ for the
big iron like they run).  They experienced very modest CPU time improvements
(about 50%).  Were they disappointed?  H*** no, in their situation, they have a
few EXECs that are used a lot.  They calculated that the first EXEC they
compiled saved enough CPU resource to pay for the compiler in 6 months, even at
'only' a 50% improvement. Everything else was bonus.  Your milage may vary ....

Jim Colten
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 11:31:51 EST
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Re: Calling an EXEC from COBOL
Comments: To: General REXX Language Discussion List
              <REXXLIST@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu>

On Fri, 10 Apr 1992 10:50:53 EDT <IRMIS007@SIVM> said:
>Is there any way of calling a REXX EXEC from a COBOL
>program without using ISPF services under VM CMS?

  Yes, there is.  I have an ASSEMBLEr program from my previous job that
does an SVC 202 call from a COBOL program so that you can issue both CP
and CMS commands.

  I also made a mod to a different ASSEMBLEr based command so that the
results of a CP command could be returned to a data area in the calling
program.

  Both are available if you think they will help.

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 10:43:10 EST
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Comments: To: General REXX Language Discussion List
              <REXXLIST@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu>

On Tue, 7 Apr 1992 08:54:17 CDT Mitchell E. Carson said:
>Hello folks,
>Is there any function within REXX that will allow the programmer to pull
>variables from the user without them being echo'd to the screen.  I am
>trying to write a logon procedure in REXX and I do not want the user's
>password displayed while they are typing it in.
>BTW, if this is documented somewhere, please include the name and number
>of the IBM publication.

Mitchell E. Carson,
  Is this for VM? PC? UNIX? Amiga?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 08:14:09 EST
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Re: Reading filelist's to stack
Comments: To: General REXX Language Discussion List
              <REXXLIST@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu>
              6 Apr 1992 18:22:45 EDT from <BXS111@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>

On Mon, 6 Apr 1992 18:22:45 EDT BRAD SILEO said:
>I am writing a rexx program which needs to have the ability to read a filelist
>to the stack, or at least find out the number of lines in the list.  Is there a
>n easy way to do this?  As a beginner to REXX, I might be missing an easy solut
>ion, but I woiuld appreciate your help.

Brad,
  FILELIST uses the LISTFILE command to get the list of files displayed.
Look at the help for LISTFILE and you will see the STACK, LIFO and FIFO
options are what you are looking for.  And look in the FILELIST EXEC for
the other options it uses on the LISTFILE command.

  Also look at the REXX help menu at the QUEUE command and QUEUED
function.

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 10:28:00 EDT
From:         "Stephen E. Bacher" <seb1525@MVS.DRAPER.COM>
Subject:      Re: address link
Comments: To: rexxlist%polygraf.bitnet@surname.draper.com,
              tso-rexx%ucf1vm.bitnet@surname.draper.com,
              c370-l@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu

On Thu, 9 Apr 1992 12:19:53 -0900 "David J. DeWolfe"
<SXDJD%alaska.bitnet@surname.draper.com> wrote:

>i'm attempting to link or attach to a module following the examples on
>page 35/36 of the MVS/REXX reference (sc28-1883).
>the module is being invoked, but the parm is not being passed correctly.
>
>the module i'm trying to link to is a (sas) C module and the main is
>declared as:    main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
>we're at TSO 2.1.0 . any help would be greatly appreciated.

If you were at TSO/E 2.3.1 (which we aren't either), you'd have
ADDRESS LINKMVS to play with, as indicated by other postings,
but you don't.  On top of this, C has to take parameters passed
via standard MVS conventions and munge them into argc/argv format,
so it needs that interface.  I recommend that you just call the
program or compile it as a TSO command processor and execute it
as a command.

Btw, C/370 will also take your parameter string and make it all
lowercase if it is all uppercase, no matter what you do.
The only way to pass uppercase data to C is to include at least
one lowercase character in the parameter string, if possible.
This is IBM's interpretation of the ANSI spec for handling
operating systems that (supposedly) don't have case-sensitive
parameter passing conventions.

 - SEB
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Acknowledge-To: <RZOTTO@DKNKURZ1>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 17:41:29 MET
From:         Otto Stolz <RZOTTO@DKNKURZ1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: executing array content

On Wed, 8 Apr 92 10:43:53 HOE antonio piedras morente said:
> [Is it] possible executing an array content that is
> the name of a rutine or function ??

The interpret statement does the trick, e.g.:
   proc.1 = "link"
   proc.2 = "write"
   proc.0 = 2   /* upper index bound, as usual */
   ...
   /* e.g., call all procedures: */
   do i = 1 to proc.0
      interpret "call" proc.i "argument"
   end i
   ...
   /* e.g., invoke a particular function: */
   i = fusc(a,b,c,d)  /* some number in the range 1 .. proc.0 */
   interpret "answer =" proc.i || "(argument)"
   /* there are possibilities other than an assignment statement: */
   interpret "parse value" proc.i || "(argument) with a1 a2 a3 ."
   ...
   exit

   link: procedure
      ...
   return three_words /* link */

   write: procedure
      ...
   return three_words /* write */

   fusc: procedure
      ...
   return some_suitable_number /* fusc */

When you try these examples, be sure to copy those quotes accurately.
You may want to put a
   trace i
statement before the interpret statement to see how the latter works.

Note that some REXX compilers do not support the interpret statement.

Happy programming,
                    Otto Stolz <RZOTTO@DKNKURZ1.Bitnet>
                               <RZOTTO@nyx.uni-konstanz.de>
From: kkruse@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Korey J. Kruse)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Subject: Re: EXEC2 Query
Date: 11 Apr 92 02:40:42 GMT
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

In article <REXXLIST%92041016211806@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU> ST9596@SIUCVMB.BITNET (Darknight) writes:
>
>    Good day.  I am seeking advice for a program written in the language
>EXEC2.  I was wondering if anyone knows of a proper forum to ask this
>question, or if any of the programmers here would lend me a hand.  Thanks
>alot for your time and patience, and sorry for the non-REXX post.
>GW"Darknight"Bondy

Try the VM-UTIL discusion list.    TELL LISTSERV at OHSTVMA /SUB VM-UTIL
should work for you.   If you just want to send them mail and not get on
the list just send mail to VM-UTIL@OSHTVMA and be sure to include in
your letter a mention that you are not subscribed.

Better yet convert the program to Rexx and discuss any problems here.
EXEC2 is a dead language.
--
    _   _   _                _       _   _    kkruse@ksuvm.bitnet
|/ | | |_) |_ \ /     |  |/ |_) | | (_` |_    kkruse@ksuvm.ksu.edu
|\ |_| | \ |_  |    (_|  |\ | \ |_| ._) |_    kkruse@matt.ksu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 17:40:08 EDT
From:         Mellon Reyes <PUP11078@PACEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: executing array content

RZOTTO,

          I just  figured your statement  out, before I  read the
     mail.

          Statement: Note, REXX compilers don't support interpret
     command.

          Is  there  anyway  to  compiler  the  program  (besides
     Crunch) in which the user doesn't have access to the code?

     //////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
     |Mellon Reyes           |                                    |
     |Pace University        | The most sincere compliment        |
     |Academic Computing Lab | we can pay is attention.           |
     |PUP11078 at PACEVM     |             -Walter Anderson       |
     --------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 23:30:37 EDT
From:         Mellon Reyes <PUP11078@PACEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      DMS Panels

Greetings,
          Does anyone know  of a discussion list  for DMS Panels?
     Or could someone help me with a question?
          Question:
          How can I intialize all the variables in a Panel to be blank?
     I usually blank them out like this:
          D1 = ' ' or D1 = copies(' ',8)
          But  my problem  is that  I have  over 80  variables or
     cells, and I consider the above method wasteful.  Can anyone help?
     //////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
     |Mellon Reyes          |                                     |
     |Pace University       |  The most sincere compliment        |
     |Academic Computing Lab|  we can pay is attention.           |
     |PUP11078 at PACEVM    |              -Walter Anderson       |
     --------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 13:37:21 CDT
From:         "Mitchell E. Carson" <JL03@UNTVM1.BITNET>
              7 Apr 1992 10:43:10 EST from <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>

Hello,
Our installation is running VM/XA CMS 5.6, Service Level 208.
This is the environment that I'm trying to write the REXX logon procedures.
Any assistance in finding a solution to the invisible entry of passwords
in REXX is appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Mitchell E. Carson
JL03 @ UNTVM1
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Thursday, 9 Apr 1992 14:03:21 CDT
From: <U56673@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Subject: compiler

I am new to rexx, however, all this talk about rexx compilers got me interested
... where can i get one?  If someone out there has one would they be kind enoug
h to send it to me (or tell me where to get one).
                                thanks,
                                     brian
                                        u56673@uicvm.cc.uic.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
From: S947460@UMSLVMA.BITNET (Andrew Zaitsev)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Subject: Re: compiler
Date: 10 Apr 92 18:36:52 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
              9 Apr 1992 22:18:28 GMT from <kkruse@MATT.KSU.KSU. EDU>

Two more points for the discussion of REXX compiler:
1) I believe, for every compiler executable code is significantly larger than
source (for example, g++ in Unix creates 100K executable from an empty
C program), so that this is not disadvantage of this particular compiler.
2) One more reason for using compiler is that if you have some REXX utilities
on the system disks, you may not want their source code to be available
to everyone.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 09:44:28 EST
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Comments: To: General REXX Language Discussion List
              <REXXLIST@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu>

On Tue, 7 Apr 1992 17:32:20 CDT Mitchell E. Carson said:
>I'm designing some security procedures as a front-end to SQL/DS.  The
>primary purpose of this is to ensure that a user that is not authorized
>to use the facility does not have access.  I have toyed around with XEDIT
>macros and control chars.  No problem with that.  However, it does seem
>strange that REXX does not have some type of built in function to handle
>this type of input.  I guess I can live with my XEDIT control char stuff
>for now.  Perhaps it's time to submit a PASR...
Mitchell,
  Actually CMS now does have this support (rel 8 I think).  It is called
PIPEs and you can build a 3270 data stream and then use a PIPE call to
display it.  I had to modify a routine to use REXXGRAF v.  The PIPE call
because I don't having plumbing.  Check out CMSPIP-L for more info.

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 16:04:05 EST
From:         Kent Fiala <SNOKLF@VM.SAS.COM>
Subject:      Re: (no subject given)
Comments: To: General REXX Discussion List
              <REXXLIST@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
              6 Apr 1992 15:25:57 EST from
              <COTRSSM%SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>

On Mon, 6 Apr 1992 15:25:57 EST Scott Mattes said:
>  To make a long story short, you DO have to allow 81 characters per line
>for the buffer you specify to EXECIO when doing the QUERY RDR * command.

Well, yes and no.  You do have to allow for the fact that there is a '15'x
appended to the end of each line.  However the lines contain no trailing
blanks, so the '15'x is not necessarily the 81st character, although to
be safe in the general case you should assume that it is.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kent Fiala <snoklf@vm.sas.com>
SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC 27513 USA                 919-677-8000 x6646
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 15:25:57 EST
Comments:     Resent-From: Scott Mattes <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Comments: To: General REXX discussion list
              <rexxlist%ucf1vm.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu>

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints


----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>
> Comments:     Resent-From: Scott Mattes <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
> From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
> X-To:         "REXX (language) discussions"
>               <rexx-l%uiucvmd.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu>
>
>   Ok, so my mind wasn't in gear before I slipped the clutch on my mouth.
> Rainer, you were right, sorry for implying the opposite.  I have never
> been bitten by this problem (dumb luck) and so never had to THINK about
> it real hard.
>
>   All the stuff below without the >s is from someone pointing out to me
> were I wasn't thinking straight.

  This is about the EXECIO and having to allow 81 characters per file in
your RDR.  I am not having a very good email day today and the balance
of the note detailing how Rainer was right and I was wrong is gone
(unless you also subscribe to REXX-L@UIUCVMD).

  To make a long story short, you DO have to allow 81 characters per line
for the buffer you specify to EXECIO when doing the QUERY RDR * command.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 07:18:52 MSZ
From:         "Juergen Hattenbach" <JHATTEN@DGOGWDG1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Match DO's and END's -- my problem is solved, many thanks!

Hallo,
ich habe mich vor Jahren aus der Liste ausgeklinkt, weil ich das
Geschwaetz nicht mehr ertrug.
Ich weiss also nicht, wovon Sie reden.
Wenn Sie mir (bitte nur informative) Auszuge zuschicken wuerden,
konnen wir weiter sehen.
Bis dann                        J. Hattenbach
From: S947460@UMSLVMA.BITNET (Andrew Zaitsev)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Subject: Re: Panels
Date: 10 Apr 92 18:32:22 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

ADDRESS DISPLAY 'MAP DATA (PREVIEW' blanks all the cell variables.
This is a faster way than using loop and INTERPRET (although if you
need initial values other than blank, I see no alternative to the
loop).
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Thu, 16 Apr 1992 16:03:42 EDT
From:         OPHOF SCOTT <ophof@SERVER.UWINDSOR.CA>
Subject:      Re: Someone asked about REXX on Unix
Comments: To: REXX Discussion list <REXXLIST%UGA.bitnet@uga.cc.uga.edu>,
              XEDIT-L@uga.uga.edu
              Apr 15, 92 4:19 pm

Scott Mattes said:
>There is a discussion list for the Work Station uni-REXX product.
>urexx-l@liverpool.ac.uk
>send your SUB UREXX-L to LISTSERV@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK

Correction:
UREXX-L is for *any* REXX implementations on Unix, not only the
version marketed by DYNASOFT.
This list also discusses XEDIT for Unix.

Regards.
$$/
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 18:39:59 PDT
From:         Rodger Bagnall <RPB@UCSFVM.BITNET>

On Wed, 8 Apr 1992 17:01:03 EST Paul Russell said:
>You can restrict access to SQL without writing a front-end in REXX (or
>any other language, for that matter).  We are running SQL/DS v2r2 under
>VM/SP 5, so this answer is based on that.
>
>The sample CP directory entry for the SQL/DS database server includes an
>'IUCV ALLOW' statement, and I suspect that you will find this statement
>in the directory entry for your server.  Change that statement to read
>'IUCV *IDENT'.  This will prevent general users from establishing a
>connection to the server.  They may be able to run the invocation execs,
>but they won't be able to do anything at all in SQL.  To enable a user
>to connect to SQL, add the following statement to that user's CP
>directory entry: 'IUCV dbid', where 'dbid' is the userid of the SQL/DS
>database server.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 16:19:03 EST
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Someone asked about REXX on Unix
Comments: To: XEDIT discussion list <xedit-l%uga.uga.edu@vm1.nodak.edu>,
              General REXX discussion list
              <rexxlist%ucf1vm.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu>,
              "REXX (language) discussions"
              <rexx-l%uiucvmd.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu>

There is a discussion list for the Work Station uni-REXX product.

urexx-l@liverpool.ac.uk

send your SUB UREXX-L to LISTSERV@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 10:43:53 HOE
From:         antonio piedras morente <ZCCBAPM@EB0UB012.BITNET>
Subject:      executing array content

Hi people.
This is my question: If possible executing an array content that is
 the name of a rutine or function ??

 For exemple:
    procedure.1 = 'link'
    procedure.2 = 'write'
    ...

link:
    'CP LINK USER1 191 22 RR RPASW'
    'CMS ACCES 22 X'
    return
    ...

\Antonio.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.rexxlist
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 15:22:09 EDT
From:         Mellon Reyes <PUP11078@PACEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Panels

Greetings to all,

          This  mail comes  as a  request for  help with  DMS/CMS
     Panels.   I have  written  a couple  of  utilities that  use
     Panels and I had one quick question:

          Is  there  an  easy  way  to  intialize  all  the  cell
     variables to blank automatically?

          I have no documentation for Panels and would appreciate
     any hints or suggestions to  help me with this problem.  The
     program contains over 80 cells any suggestions in decreasing
     execution time would be appreciated.

///////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
|Mellon Reyes          |                                               |
|Pace University       | Life is one big canvas, and                   |
|Academic Computing Lab| you should throw all the paint on it you can. |
|PUP11078 at PACEVM    |                                   -Danny Kay  |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU