HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush
From: liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Distribution: usa
Date: 6 Nov 92 16:06:47 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.064324.20366@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>In article <1992Nov5.224620.2540@wixer.cactus.org> rhodesia@wixer.cactus.org (Felix S. Gallo) writes:
>>rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>>>
>>>What a sad
>>>time in history for America and the world this is.  Worse yet, Hillary will
>>>also inhabit the White House (soon to become the Red House) and give Slick
>>>Willie orders as to how he should run the nation.
>>
>>Psst, hate to tell you, but Communism doesn't even exist any more as an
>>organized opposition to Democracy.  And even Bush stopped the red-baiting
>>when he realized people just aren't that dumb any more.
>
>That's what the communists want everyone to believe.  It looks like you've
>been watching too much of the Jane Fonda News Network, A.K.A. CNN. 
>
>>>America: prepare to impeach Hillwilly & Al before it's too late!
>>
>>I have a better idea.  Why don't all you arrogant, idiotic republicans
>>who have been preaching "america, love it or leave it" for the last
>>three administrations stop being so hypocritical and help the rest of
>>us out here?  We are also Americans.  We chose Clinton.  Help out the
>>country or get the hell out of the way.
>
>No.  My ancestors were amongst this nation's founding fathers.  You leave...

I hope he's not Jefferson Davis.  

>and take Slick Willie and the Democratic party with you... I'm sure that 
>you'd be much happier in Cuba or Russia, where there are still a lot of

with $1 = 1200 rubles and rising by the minute, yes, you can live
like a Czar I guess.  

>communists who are opposing Mr. Yeltsin.  Have a nice trip :-) :-) :-)
>
Oh, so Gorby labeled everyone opposed him "Capitalist", and Yeltsin
labeled everyone opposing him "Communist", what else is new?  
and the US republicans labeled everyone have different opinions from
them "Godless witchcraft practicing tri-sexual commie/pinko draft
dodging adulters-feminazis".  Is there a pattern here?   
>
>
>
>-- 
>Robert D. Davis            |  VAX/VMS is a text-only adventure game.  If       
>rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu  !  you win, you get to use UNIX.  If you fail, 
>uunet!mystica!rdd          |  you get to use an IBM-PC running MeSsy-DOS
>Telephone: 1-410-744-7964  !  with MeSsy-Windows or an Apple Macintosh.  


Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6295 alt.politics.bush:13180 alt.politics.clinton:15831
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: !!!!????????????...........................
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 10:02:24 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
Distribution: usa
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:

> handd@tramp.Colorado.EDU (handd) writes:

> >!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
> >....................................................................
> >

> I'm wondering if this is a Perot supporter who was surprised that he
> didn't sweep all 50 states.

Oh, but didn't you know? A Perot spokesman who was interviewed on election
night claimed that they did win all 50 states (!), because they forced
greater voter participation.

This is similar to Saddam Hussein's reasoning when he said that he won the
mother of all battles because Allah smiled at him for defying the infidels.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: A Classy Exit
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 92 20:32:06 GMT
Organization: Wireless Broadcasting Guild, Houston, Texas

v22964qs@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Mike Cluff) writes:

> In article <D2150056.ht8hs9@erics.infoserv.com>, erics@infoserv.com writes...
> 
> >A classy little speech, true, but an exit? I'm not so sure. Remember
> >he also said "Bill Clinton will be the president for the next four years."
> >Don't be surprised if Danny has some ambition up his sleeve.
> 
> Heh.  Imagine the primaries in '96 when Quayle has to square off against the
> likes of Kemp and perhaps Dole.  Ouch.  Maybe he'll beat Yammer Rudman by
> the simple feat of being less boring.
> 
> *****************************************************************************
> Mike Cluff				*  "If something about the human	
> v22964qs@ubvms or mike%luick@ubvms	*   body disgusts you, complain to
> UB Language Perception Laboratory	*   the manufacturer." - Lenny Bruce	
> *****************************************************************************

And don't forget Senator Phil Gramm, and also Bennett has expressed a 
possibility he will run in '96.  It's gonna be a fun primary for these 
guys as they sort themselves out.

--
popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Wireless Broadcasting Guild, Houston, Texas, (713) 943-2728
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
From: scharle@lukasiewicz.cc.nd.edu (scharle)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Newsgroup name change was Re: Dan Quayle?
Date: 12 Nov 92 12:22:07 GMT
Reply-To: scharle@lukasiewicz.cc.nd.edu (scharle)
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame

In article <1992Nov11.232552.19571@rigel.econ.uga.edu>, hughes@dogwood.botany.uga.edu (Wayne Hughes) writes:
    ...
|> 
|>    I don't imagine he'd have *any* difficulty winning back his
|>    Indiana seat in the Senate.  This isn't a comment so much on
|>    *dan* as it is on *indiana*.
    ...
    I must come to the defense of Indiana!
    Dan's former seat in the Senate is held by Dan Coates, who was just re-elected,
so that will not be available for 6 years.  The other Indiana senator is Dick Lugar,
a Republican, who is well-liked in Indiana, and actually competent (IMHO).  I am 
not sure when his term is up (could some other Hoosier enlighten us?), but it
would seem difficult for any Republican to challenge him in 1994 (if that's when
it is).
    
|>    Wayne
|> 

-- 
Tom Scharle                |cm65n6@irishmvs(Bitnet)
Room G003 Computing Center |scharle@lukasiewicz.cc.nd.edu(Internet)
University of Notre Dame  Notre Dame, IN 46556-0539 USA
From: crb2@Ra.MsState.Edu (Chad R. Berthelson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: 1996 GOP Veep Choice (Was: Re: Complete this sentence)
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:03:47 GMT
Organization: Mississippi State University

erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) writes:


>ronnie@cisco.com (Ronnie B. Kon) writes:

>> My bet for '96: Quayle/Kassenbaum.  Not willing to bet too much on the VP
>> selection, but I'm willing to bet a fair amount that Our Man Dan will be
>> the nominee.

>If we're going to be serious (and, after all, why should we be?), no
>matter who the Repubs run for the top spot, there's only one obvious
>choice for Veep: Colin Powell. A chance to grab some of the black and
>minority vote, keep the anti-gay right wingers, and relive the glorious
>days of Desert Storm, all in one package.

>And if the GOP doesn't pick him, Perot will.

Well, I have 2 points.

	1)  Just having a black man isn't enough to rally the black
	    vote for the Republicans.   Look at Judge Thomas....
	    Colin Powell would be a great choice, but I don't think
	    his 'being black' (as an issue) will help any extra.

	2)  Perot doesn't 'get' to pick...He can only pick from people
	    who are willing to take the job (Schwartkoff (sp?) didn't 
	    accept this time).

both of which boil down to Colin Powell not being a liberal, that..
more than skin color, will determine who votes for him.

Chad


--

Chad R. Berthelson		Graduate Research/Teaching Assistant
crb2@ra.msstate.edu		Biological Engineering
cberth@abe.msstate.edu		Mississippi State University
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: seconding the motion....
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 11:02:23 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford) writes:

> erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) writes:

> |> You got that right. Wilson will practically have to pull off a political
> |> miracle to keep the governorship in '94. He suffered a number of big
> |> setbacks in this election ... [details omitted] ...  Wilson
> |> will now have to deal with the right wing of the California GOP, which
> |> is very upset with him, as well as an increasingly hostile Democratic
> |> legislature.

> I'm not sure where you're located, but one of the local network
> reporters reported on Tuesday night, after talking to Wilson, that
> Wilson was LIVID about having to give the appearance of supporting the
> GOP platform (he's pro-choice, a moderate Republican, etc.) knowing
> full well that that BS wouldn't fly in CA.  Wilson was particularly
> angry that he couldn't present Seymour in a more moderate light under
> the circumstances, and felt that the GOP lost CA immediately after the
> convention in Houston.  He also believed that our boy (Quayle, that
> is) hurt Bush's chances not only in CA but in other "moderate" states.
> 
> The reporter predicted  that Wilson would come out swinging sometime 
> soon, possibly in an attempt to distance himself from the far-right 
> coalition that seems to have seized control of the party.  While I'm
> no undying fan of Wilson, I do believe that he is a more moderate
> Republican voice.  It's going to be interesting to see what happens
> to the GOP.  I predict a split into two separate parties.

Wilson's stated stands on the issues are more moderate than the average
Republican politician. However, his actions as governor often belie
the image he's tried to create. As governor he's attempted to gut the
welfare system, thereby adding to the enormous homeless population problem;
he's attempted to slash the budget for education while continuing
Deukmajian's program to build ever more numerous and larger prisons,
and he vetoed gay rights legislation. Yes, in the wake of this presidential
election, Wilson, like many other Republicans including Quayle, will
attempt to position himself more toward the moderate wing of the party,
and claim that he's a man who appeal to the swing voters who went Democratic
this year. But he's going to have serious problems from liberals and
moderates because of his record as governor, and he's going to have
serious problems with the right wing of his own party, who see him as
having torpedoed the Bush/Quayle effort in California. That's what I
meant when I said that it will take something of a poltical miracle
for him to be re-elected in '94.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: garrett@Ingres.COM (It's not what you got, it's what you give)
Subject: Re: Maybe we won't miss Dan so much...
Summary: Heresy!  
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Keywords: 
Organization: ASK Computer Systems, Ingres Product Division
Date: 10 Nov 92 21:31:35 GMT

In article <BxI33H.JzH@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, asurpren@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (aimee surprenant)         writes...
> 
>Maybe we won't miss Dan so much!
> 
ERGH!...[BLUSTER]...HOW CAN...!?...[SPUTTER]....HEATHEN!
HERETIC!SCOUNDREL! How dare you defile this network with such SLANDER!
AWAY vile vermin!I exorcise you from this newsgroup!
:-):-)

>-Aimee

Garrett@Ingres.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cah@pavonis.JPL.NASA.gov (Allen Halsell)
Subject: Re: V.P. Marilyn Quayle 1996
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA/Caltech
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 00:08:47 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.130244.1@woods.ulowell.edu>, enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
> You heard it here first on January 20 1997 Quayle will again be Vice President.
> Marylin that is.  Because Kemp Quayle is going to win by a huge LANDSLIDE a
> real one not ths paltry 42% victory that Comrade Clinton received.
> 
> Kemp -Quayle '96.

Hey!  A new joke to pick apart!

*********************************************************************
the only thing that speaks the truth is the eloquence of passing time
               the spoken word is a jacket too tight
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: myrab@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (myra.bronstein)
Subject: Re: Danny's finest hour!
Summary: not saying a whole lot is it?
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 21:29:25 GMT

In article <92309.104554RAJA@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>, <RAJA@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> writes:
> I don't know what others thought but for the FIRST Time our esteemed soon to be
>  ex-vp showed some class yesterday. He was honest enough to say " if Bill Clint
> on governs as well as he has Campaigned , we will be in fine shape". Quite extr
> aordinary considering  his past! Good luck to him, probably join one of those t
> hink tanks, for the life of me i can't understand why? Do ex-vp's get a pension
> ?
> 
> rajagopalan;-)

Not that I'm cynical, or jaded or anything (Moi?),
but I think Danny was clearly putting on his
1996 presidential campaign face for the benifit
of the cameras and the public.  
I agree that he said the right *words*, I just
know that the reason he said them 
was to further his own eventual political
ambitions rather than because he deeply believes 
the *words*.

Besides, action speaks louder...
His actions over the years have been quite articulate
even if he's seldom been.

But he knows how short the public's memory is and
assumes they'll only remember his gracious *words*.

Myra
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: wilder@mik.uky.edu (jeff wilder)
Subject: Re: spelling in this newsgroup (was Re: ignore)
Keywords: a.f.d-q
    <chil.720905568@sfu.ca>
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
X-Path: wilder
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 01:58:35 GMT

In <chil.720905568@sfu.ca> chil@fraser.sfu.ca (Keith Lim) writes:

|awells@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Andrew V. Wells) writes:

|>Hasta La Vista, George!
|>Adios, Danoe!
|>Chow, a.f.d-q!
| ^^^^
|In this newsgroup in particular, you should be careful how you spell words.

On the contrary!  One of my favorite things about this group is the
way that folks misspell words, and then, when called on it, attribute   
it to Quaylish humor. :-)  This is the *safest* newsgroup to Quayl on.

(Okay now, Bill...don't let me down...)

Oh, I may as well take this opportunity to thank all of you for many, 
*many* laugh out loud sessions in a dull, quiet NeXT lab.  Although  
I've been mostly a lurker, I still feel like I'm gonna lose part of my
family in a couple of months. :-(

One last thing, since I may not have another chance:  can somebody
tell me where to find the latest Quote list, or email it to me?  BTW,
I think it should include Dan's line in his concession speech about        
how he and Marilyn have "been congressmen, senator, and vice-president."

--
==============================================================================
| Jeff W  uk06666@ukpr.uky.edu | Meddle not in the affairs of cats, for they |
| Wilder  & wilder@mik.uky.edu | are subtle, and will piss on your cyberdeck.|
==============================================================================
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson)
Subject: Re: Complete this sentence
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 03:54:40 GMT

In <MICHAEL.92Nov6221759@albert.bu.edu> michael@albert.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin) writes:


>The U.S. Constitution prevents anyone from serving as V.P. who isn't
>constitutionally elegible to serve as President to begin with,
>so Nixon therefore couldn't. He could, though, serve as an executive
>advisor, or cabinet secretary, or somesuch. 

OK, good. I've gotten this far...now....keeping with this
scenario...if Nixon were to serve in the cabinet, is there not still
the chance that he could become president through the succession order
(if enough people got bumped off)?

Sorry, I'm not up on my US president succession stuff tonight. But I
seem to recall vaguely that after the Pres, VP, Pres-pro-tem-senate,
it goes to Sec. of State and then through the cabinet. 

Would that also then qualify as "constitutionally eligible to serve as
President" in a sense?

Michael
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6741 alt.politics.elections:23741 talk.politics.misc:60047
From: jxxl@taurus.cs.nps.navy.mil (Comet Kahoutek)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.elections,talk.politics.misc
Subject: RFD: alt.loathing.bob-dole
Date: 12 Nov 92 17:05:24 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Church of Ill-Repute

Is it just my imagination or has Speaker Dole turned quite sour of late?
All of a sudden he's revering the late George Bush as if he were the
Messiah--and Bush is the guy who knocked Dole out of the 1988 contest
with more of his dirty campaign tactics. Dole has hinted of his interest
in going after the 1996 nomination, but his bitter disposition would
make him appear as a long shot to rally public affection.
From: KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Mr. Quayle's Future Plans
Date: 12 Nov 92 06:17:17 GMT

In article <Nov.5.16.04.59.1992.16073@yoko.rutgers.edu>, imam@yoko.rutgers.edu
(Adil S. Imam) says:

>[...]
>[Please insert some funny comments here - I don't feel like adding
>them since I am too saddened by the fact that this newsgroup is going
>to end soon - Can't we keep it alive, maybe, as someone suggested, by
>posting all the politician.weasel, politician.deer-in-the-eyes things
>here??]

Oh God, no... don't -encourage- her!... arrrggghhhh.....

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton)
Subject: Re: in the current NewsWeek...
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 03:13:20 GMT

In article <1dpsigINNfqd@girtab.usc.edu> echeverr@scf.usc.edu (5150) writes:
>
>... there's a cartoon where Bush, Danoe, and Jim Baker are on a park bench
>going thru the Help Wanted section... Quayle is drawn very small, with a 
>great 'deer in the headlights' look and a sign:  "Will werk for fud."
>
>5150
>classic

 I believe this was originally an Atlanta Journal And Constitution editorial
 cartoonist cartoon.  *proud smile*  I maybe wrong.  I'll have to go double
 check.  It's on my wall at home.  :)

 cat

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford)
Subject: Re: seconding the motion....
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 00:12:25 GMT

In article <D2150056.hvo1j9@erics.infoserv.com>, erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) writes:
|> 
|> You got that right. Wilson will practically have to pull off a political
|> miracle to keep the governorship in '94. He suffered a number of big
|> setbacks in this election ... [details omitted] ...  Wilson
|> will now have to deal with the right wing of the California GOP, which
|> is very upset with him, as well as an increasingly hostile Democratic
|> legislature.
|> 

I'm not sure where you're located, but one of the local network
reporters reported on Tuesday night, after talking to Wilson, that
Wilson was LIVID about having to give the appearance of supporting the
GOP platform (he's pro-choice, a moderate Republican, etc.) knowing
full well that that BS wouldn't fly in CA.  Wilson was particularly
angry that he couldn't present Seymour in a more moderate light under
the circumstances, and felt that the GOP lost CA immediately after the
convention in Houston.  He also believed that our boy (Quayle, that
is) hurt Bush's chances not only in CA but in other "moderate" states.

The reporter predicted  that Wilson would come out swinging sometime 
soon, possibly in an attempt to distance himself from the far-right 
coalition that seems to have seized control of the party.  While I'm
no undying fan of Wilson, I do believe that he is a more moderate
Republican voice.  It's going to be interesting to see what happens
to the GOP.  I predict a split into two separate parties.

-- 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|    /)                      | Lana Mountford    
|   / /  __    ___    __     |   
|__(_/__(__)\__/  )__(__)\__ |  
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge)
Subject: Re: Transition Team Members Wanted
Keywords: Flame, attraction of moths to
Organization: Paramax Systems Corporation, Paoli PA
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 14:54:55 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.055121.23017@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>, rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu 
(Robert Davis) pounds on a defenseless keyboard:

|> Too bad that the U.S. political system failed and allowed Slick Willie & Al
|> to become elected, after all, in the the popular vote, not the electoral
|> vote, President Bush and VP Quayle WON this election!  However, the
|> liberal media is trying their best to downplay this fact, just as they did
|> their best to keep the truth about Billy Boy from being told to the American
|> public.  I guess that they'll soon be painting the White House red to
|> represent the true political, communist/socialist, leanings of Hillwilly
|> and Gorey Al.


   Sore loser.

-- 
 _________________________________________________________________________
|                                 |                                       |
| Herbert Rutledge, aka Train     |                                       |
| Paramax Systems Corporation     | "To post is human; to flame, divine." |
| Valley Forge Labs, M/S GVL-3    |                                       |
| P.O. Box 517, Paoli, PA  19301  |                     ---Alexander Pope |
| Internet: train@.gvl.unisys.com |                                       |
|_________________________________|_______________________________________|

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: glass@adcalc.fnal.gov (Michael Glass)
Subject: Copy of message to Dhanesh, wondering where he is, etc.
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-a4  
Reply-To: glass@adcalc.fnal.gov
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Distribution:  world
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:40:16 GMT

(This is a copy of a message I sent to Dhanesh, in response to
 the "a.f.dks" thread started, as I recall, by Elizabeth Levy)

Dhanesh:

     Various a.f.d-q folks have been noticing how dry life has become
since you stopped posting.  Since a.f.d-q (as we know it) might well
soon dissolve, can I persuade you to post another goodbye message?
(Assuming that you are in a position to do so.)  All your a.f.d-q fans,
friends, and acquaintances would appreciate it muchly.

     The juice of life clearly overflows in you; I and many other people
thank you for spilling some of it our way.

-- Michael Glass            |  Practice random acts of
   glass@adcalc.fnal.gov    |  humor and senseless mirth.

cc: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6625 rec.sport.football.pro:23669