HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: Credibility...
Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 04:03:23 GMT

In article <ewright.727735009@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>In <93020.213759SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA (Graydon) writes:
>
>>Ed, whoa - why is being single a pathological condition?
>
>Being single is not a pathological condition.  *Enjoying* 
>being single would be.  Evolution would have eliminating
>any such trait from the species long ago.

Amazing.  I take it that you don't believe in homosexuality, or war, or
any of the other contra-survival behavior patterns.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Red shirts finish faster.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Darts?  was:Women on Top
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:21:13 GMT

In article <16581@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>Last night I competed in the championship match in the Bud Light Dart League.
>Earlier in the week my steel tip team also played in the final match and
>took first place.  My soft tip team didn't fare so well.

Don't you know the trick?  When you're losing, you start power-throws from
hell and try to get a particle hopelessly stuck so the board goes into a stall
and needs the piece removed from inside.  Then you can move to another board
and you get another chance.

Of course this would be tough with steel-tips.  :-)

-- 
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Nance Colucci                                      att!ihlpl!colucci
  "And my son has a thyroid, so that must make me a glandparent."
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
From: brent.mason@uuworld.via.mind.ORG (Brent Mason) 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: SM ISO MAIL
Date: 25 Jan 93 15:28:00 GMT
Reply-To: brent.mason@uuworld.via.mind.ORG (Brent Mason) 
Distribution: world
Organization: Micro Exchange - Kenwood, CA - 707-833-4032

  > In article <C19GCo.DE7@cen.ex.ac.uk> st92rcn@cen.ex.ac.uk writes:
  >
  >    My name is rachel and I want your body
  >
       Well alright, I'll join in.  I'm happy with my body right now, but
maybe more accurately it's what's I'd like to do to your mind through
your body!!  (my the powers of imagination)

       Brent Mason
---
 . BABBLE v1.0 . OS/2 2.0 vs Widdows 3.1... There is no comparison!
 . KMail 2.94  Micro Exchange
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Honesty, Your word, and Trust -- a crisis?
Date: 23 Jan 93 12:59:25
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
	<1993Jan22.213916.14799@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grover.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu's message of Fri, 22 Jan 93 21:39:16 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.213916.14799@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Wall) writes:

   Aren't you ever sitting around thinking about life and realize how screwed
   up something is.  It's pretty unlikely that it just now became screwed up,
   you just happened to notice and it became mildly important to you and you
   applied some brain power to it.

It may be all this therapy, but it appears to me that this usually means
something's bugging *me* more than that the world has changed.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Interracial Relationships
Date: 23 Jan 93 13:14:05
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
	<1993Jan22.141620.16556@bnlux1.bnl.gov>
	<1993Jan23.001455.16893@leland.Stanford.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grover.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: rna@leland.Stanford.EDU's message of Sat, 23 Jan 93 00:14:55 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.001455.16893@leland.Stanford.EDU> rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft) writes:

   .... Hope I haven't trodden on anyone's preconceptions.

Why?  You trying to cut down on the soc.singles traffic?
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Credibility...
Date: 26 Jan 93 10:45:03
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
	<ewright.727988060@convex.convex.com> <9084@news.duke.edu>
	<ewright.728022512@convex.convex.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grover.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: ewright@convex.com's message of Tue, 26 Jan 1993 04:28:32 GMT

In article <ewright.728022512@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:

   >I guess I could 
   >envision a reluctance to interact with a male friend on a one-on-one
   >basis if I felt that it would *lead* to an unwanted romantic interaction,
   >but that's not very common.  

   I don't see how an interaction can be "romantic" and "unwanted" at
   the same time.  Presumeably you mean something like "sexual."

I think she means he becomes romantic -- not sexual, romantic, develops
an interest in a long term relationship with exclusivity, wants to carry
her away to the Casbah, that sort of thing -- when she doesn't want to
be carried away.

--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: *How* did you meet your SO (And do they know?)
Date: 22 Jan 93 14:37:10 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

weaver@jetsun.weitek.COM (Michael Gordon Weaver) writes:

>I have learned not to ask a couple questions about their early
>relationship when they are together, because always seem to
>have such different views of it, and often feel they should
>remember it all the same way. 

A while ago, my PYM and I had a disagreement about what the first thing I
said to him was. I won a dinner out of it. (Since we'd saved the email, it
was easy to check.)

We had way different experiences of our early relationship. 'Smatter of
fact we have different experiences of our relationship now. We're two
different people, it's to be expected.

As for whether the appearance of communication is more important than real
communication, I think the appearance would be sufficient if no one ever
found out that it was appearance-only. But the longer you spend with 
someone, the harder it is to keep up the appearance if there is no real 
communication. (And sometimes you need temporary communication breakdown 
in order to develop real communication.)

--
Stef                 Reality is that which, when you stop believing
stef@apple.com       in it, doesn't go away.
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Query [FM]
Date: 22 Jan 93 20:02:36 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <305@cnmhnet.UUCP> keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard) writes:
|OK drieux, I'll accept your vignette on AOR as the truth
|because it IS the truth.  However, I feel that I must 
|elaborate.  
|	FM stations began to proliferate in the early 70's
|because peoples' tastes for quality music began to change.
|By quality music, I am referring to quality of sound, not
|style.  AM stations give static when passing under power lines,
|and fade out when passing under bridges.  FM compensates for
|these deviations.  

That's simplifying it quite a bit.  For one thing AM has a high end 
frequency cutoff at 10KHZ.  8-Track tapes had a higher frequency range.
Each mode has it's advantages and disadvantages.  FM is typically line
of site propogation.  AM radios range is much greater.  It's not unusual
to hear 50KW clearsignal AM stations from over 1000 miles away.

|	Why and how did FM become popular?  AM radio tended
|to play only the top 40 hits, as you said.  Under that
|format, how many songs can you remember being played from
|the Beatles' white album[which was a double album]? 

My recollection is hearing the entire version of "Maggot Brain" by the
Funkadelics late at night on KSJO, which along with KSAN were probably
the first Album Oriented Radio stations.

-- 
-john
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex
From: mel@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu (Meloney D Cregor)
Subject: Re: Problems with being single
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 23:39:06 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.033320.16470@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:

>Which Clearly Raises the pressing Question:
>
>"If you will not talk with Yourself, 
>Why should anyone else?"

Hey, then I got nuthin' to worry about. I talk to myself all the time and
occasionally answer myself.  It sometimes weirds out the people around me,
but I figure that's their problem for listening in on a private conversation.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Second Date
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 23:53:09 GMT

In article <16652@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <JMD.93Jan26144617@lion.bear.com> jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond) writes:
> 
>Or consider this scenario...
>
>You go out to a dinner and a movie.  Afterwords you go back to your
>place and have really great sex.  In the morning you get up, shower
>together and then go out to breakfast.  The question is:  Who pays
>for breakfast?
>-john
 
After great sex with me, 'her' naturally.
 
SEG alert SEG alert. Bwoop Bwoop.

 
================================================================================
 Steatopygias's 'R' Us.          doh#0000000005 That ain't no Hottentot.
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. AMA#669373 DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: Marvin Raab
Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 01:27:58 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.230506.10435@csi.uottawa.ca> misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel) writes:
>In article <JMD.93Jan26232631@flatline.bear.com>, jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond) writes:
>
>> Gee -- do you mean Marvin Raab?  I haven't heard him mentioned in
>> these parts in a _long_ time...
>>
>> Anyone heard from him recently?  Marvin -- you out there?
>
>   In the last post from him that I saw, he said he had given up 
>on soc.singles ("I don't even grep for my name any more"), because
>he found it boringly repetitious.  But he was still posting to
>ba.singles.

I think he's almost given up on that, too, now that it's become a
stomping ground for all the local flamers.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Kinky vanilla queer het
From: pamaga@biobase.aau.dk (Paulo Magalhaes)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: "Women on Top" by Nancy F.
Date: 21 Jan 93 13:56:27 GMT
Organization: The Danish BioBase

In <93020.0009092971047@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> <2971047@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> writes:

>I realize that this may not be the most correct group for this posting.
>Nevertheless, I'd like _your_ reactions.

>I'm reading Nancy Friday's "Women on Top"  (ab. 1/3 through).  My question
>is this:  Do you think that the women who contributed are representative of
>"women in general" ?

NO WAY!!!

But wouldn't some be terribly exciting?! ;-)
From: diamond@acpub.duke.edu (Elizabeth Abrams)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Trygve's shower
Date: 23 Jan 93 22:32:59 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

>Trygve   (I'm still working on the plans for a bathroom built like a
>          bathroom should be--great big tub with an enclosure built 
>          around and above it (current plan is for cobalt blue tile)
>          with three shower heads, recessed reading lights, a fold-out
>          reading table, little shelves to put the candles on, a
>          reasonable but mostly invisible stereo, and, well, other 
>          stuff--maybe when that gets built it'll help my relative
>          position.)

Oh, my.

I happen to have a weakness for well-designed bathing areas.  When you
get it finished, let me know if you need someone to help scrub your 
back.

			--Diamond (I hope that one part of the 'other
				   stuff' doesn't turn out to be 
				   a robotic back-scrubber).

diamond@acpub.duke.edu| We cross our bridges when we come to them and burn
Elizabeth S. Abrams   | them behind us, with nothing to show for our progress 
		      | but the memory of the smell of smoke, and the  
                      | presumption that once our eyes watered. -Tom Stoppard
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Greetings Stef...
Date: 22 Jan 93 14:23:18 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

phantasm@iastate.edu writes:

>Stef:

>> Who are you, anyway? You keep coming around here with these mysterious 
>> suck-ups, but I've never managed to catch you actually saying anything...

>Forgive me... I did not realize that was a rule...

Not a rule, just a preference. (I like my men to talk first, sigh
incoherently later.) 

Stef
stef@apple.com
--
IMPORTANT NOTE TO PURCHASERS: The Entire Physical Universe, Including This
Product, May One Day Collapse Back into an Infinitesimally Small Space.
Should Another Universe Subsequently Re-emerge, the Existence of This
Product in That Universe Cannot Be Guaranteed. 
                                      -- Susan Hewitt and Edward Subitzky
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: SM ISO MAIL
From: quirke_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Date: 26 Jan 93 14:34:24 NZST
Distribution: world
Organization: Welligton City Council, Public Access.
NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:

: Its perfectly fair and reasonable to
: insult someone on the net using every bit of personal and specific
: information about them or their posts that you have (well almost)
: especially if it is funny, but it is not okay to use racial stereotypes to 
: insult a single individual. It gets a big -10 on the broad-band mode.

   It would appear that any post I might make on this is now redundant. Max
seems to have stated my feelings most concisely and accurately.

-- 
Tony Quirke, Wellington, New Zealand (Quirke_A@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz)
"Only the free have disposition to be truthful.
 Only the truthful have the interest to be just.
 Only the just possess the willpower to be free." - WH Auden.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Credibility...
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 08:37:07 GMT

In article <ewright.728021087@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>In <1993Jan26.002537.21249@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>
>>Remember, "happy being single" means "happy being single"--and
>>doesn't in any respect necessarilly imply that they wish to avoid 
>>being unsingle.  
>
>Sorry, Trygve, but "I'm happy being single" originally appeared on
>your list of reasons for not being married.  If being happy being
>single does not imply a preference for being single, it was out of
>place on your list.

Not at all--"happy being single" implies that I'm not feeling any desperate
need to be unsingle at the moment; while this does not imply a preference
for being single, it does imply that I don't feel any tremendous urgency
to cease to be single.  As such, it's a valid entry on my list and goes in
the general category of "reasons why I haven't tried all that hard to 
stop being single." 

>>Trygve   (I'm trying very, very hard not to make any "Mister Ed" jokes
>>          here.  I hope you're proud of me.) >
>
>Well, it's a start, but doesn't quite make up for bringing America
>all those Gilligan's Island reruns.

Awww, gee.  Well, lucky for you, we here in the cable TV business are
working even now on ways to make sure you don't have to watch "Gilligan's
Island" reruns or even episodes of the upcoming series, "Gilligan's
Island, the Next Generation."  Later this year, we'll be unveiling the
new 24-hour "Leave it to Beaver" channel, so you'll always have an
entertaining and wholesome alternative to GITNG; better yet, we're working
on a plan to keep expanding those annoying little station ID symbols that
live in the bottom right corner of your screen and never go away except
during commercials--by mid-1995, the plan is to have expanded them to the
point where they cover the entire screen and we can all save big bucks by
purchasing only the audio rights to the Gilligan's Island reruns we'll be
showing.  (Don't worry, though--we'll be passing those savings on to us.)

Trygve   (I hope I haven't revealed any trade secrets here....)
--
AT LAST!  FITNESS FOR YOUR INSIDES AND YOUR OUTSIDES!
 
Now you can look as good as you feel and feel as good as you look with the
first product that combines good nutrition and good looks!  Slip into any of
the Schaeffer Image's complete line of SpamDex high-protein edible fitness
wear and you'll look as good as you taste.  SpamDex's patented form-fitting
fabric will wrap itself around your body, outlining every sexy curve or
bulging muscle and it tastes good too!  High in protein, chock full of
vitamins, and now with oat bran!
      SpamDex edible exercise wear:  pink   Order #SPAMUP-500  $22.50 (2.00)
                                     green  Order #SPAMUG-500  $21.50 (2.00)
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Important Answer Provided
Date: 28 Jan 1993 08:05:35 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
NNTP-Posting-Host: carina.unm.edu

In article <93026.195248HOLTONS@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> Psycho!! <HOLTONS@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> writes:
>>Kinky is to Vanilla as
>>Queer is to Lime Jello.
>   Well... to be honest, I'm not sure I even get it now.

>Please< somebody tell me they got the Lime Jello reference!
r.
From: souchay@CAM.ORG (Francois Souchay)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Could be worse (was: Re: Upper Midwest)
Date: 20 Jan 93 13:35:30 GMT
Organization: Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada

In article <1993Jan18.232318.7907@leland.Stanford.EDU> rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft) writes:
>In article <MARTINC.93Jan17110721@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan17.045914.20825@leland.Stanford.EDU> rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft) writes:
>>   Or maybe Canadian journalists simply want to work in a country with
>>   constitutional free speech protections.
>>Well, so much for a fun kidding thread.
>Yeah, reality intrudes again.  Bummer.

"What a drag it is getting old"    Jagger/Richards, 19th Nervous Breakdown.

Francois. 
Xref: sparky soc.singles:38030 talk.bizarre:46512
From: Cannam@sc.ZIB-Berlin.de (Chris Cannam)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: Mushy_O_Phobic v. CloseAirSupport_O_Phobics
Date: 26 Jan 93 11:39:51
Organization: Konrad Zuse Zentrum fuer Informationstechnik Berlin
	<1993Jan13.070533.3693@tc.fluke.COM>
	<1993Jan15.185458.24342@ultb.isc.rit.edu>
	<1993Jan17.005156.26693@siemens.com>
	<MARTINC.93Jan19103002@grover.cs.unc.edu>
	<CANNAM.93Jan19173429@borodin.sc.ZIB-Berlin.de>
	<MARTINC.93Jan19154451@grover.cs.unc.edu>
	<C1As0D.EJ6@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
	<MARTINC.93Jan23132743@grover.cs.unc.edu>
	<C1GG94.6JK@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: borodin.zib-berlin.de
In-reply-to: kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu's message of Tue, 26 Jan 1993 09:41:28 GMT


In article <C1GG94.6JK@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:

   martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
   kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:

   >>Next thing you'll be urging people to play the schaum.

Play the schaum, people.

   [...]

   Raise a great base rackett even.  

Cue bass viol jests:  That's really bass, and very viol.  Ho, ho.  How
we guffawed and chortled.

Can I put in a word for the pommer?


--
           on sighting mathematicians it should unhook the algebra from their
             minds and replace it with poetry;  on sighting poets it should
               unhook poetry from their minds and replace it with algebra

Xref: sparky soc.singles:37652 soc.penpals:5868 alt.romance:16349 alt.romance.chat:23868
From: rkf@wildrose.uucp (Ray Fink)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.penpals,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat
Subject: Re: SM ISO MAIL
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 93 09:10:17 -0700
Reply-To: wildrose!rkf@infoserv.com
Organization: Wild Rose Jet Lag Society

In <C19GCo.DE7@cen.ex.ac.uk> st92rcn@cen.ex.ac.uk writes:
>My name is rachel and I want your body

Too late rachel, I left the UK over a week ago. In future, I'd 
suggest making reservations well in advance :-) 

(PS don't leave your terminal logged in and unattended either)

-- 
-- Ray

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: walter (Walter Lego)
Subject: Re: Flirting How To Guide/Backrubs
Followup-To: soc.singles
Reply-To: nobody
Organization: Twisted Pair Inc.
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 19:39:34 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.184821.3007@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <1993Jan27.172040.29993@cbnews.cb.att.com> eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (Piglet) writes:
>>But, but, but.... <splutter>...  Dutton looks _good_ in a tutu!  
>>
> 
>Damn straight.

But nothing different was suggested, Brother James.

						Walter

What disclaimer?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: irving@halcyon.com (Larry Gilbert)
Subject: Re: Credibility...
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 16:01:00 GMT

diamond@acpub.duke.edu (Elizabeth Abrams) writes:

>I didn't really mean sexual, exactly; I guess I meant that I'd be unwilling
>to spend time alone with a man (or woman for that matter) if I thought that 
>a) the person in question was likely to assume that the one-on-one interaction
>meant that I was interested in a more than friendly way, and b) I *wasn't* 
>interested in a more than friendly way.  

Open question:  Is there a good way for the man in this situation to
figure out what is going on (assuming that, for whatever reason, the
woman is unwilling to tell him directly)?  Does he look for subtle clues
like "Oh goodness, look at the time, I really must go home and floss the
cat"?

-- 
Larry Gilbert       |  Copyright 1993             | [:)] This article has
irving@halcyon.com  |  All rights reserved        |  /   been closed smileyed
Seattle, WA, USA    |  Reprinted with permission  |      for the humor-impaired
Newsgroups: soc.singles