HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:45:07 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
: In article <1449@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
: 
: >ONCE AGAIN pose the the questions the Limbots have been dodging:
: 	Actually, I've never heard Rush. All the right people seem to hate
: him though . . .
: 
: >
: >1) If George Bush was not suggesting that atheists are in some way
: >inferior U.S. citizens, and perhaps should not be considered
: >citizens at all, then WHAT WAS he saying?  What sort of code was he
: >using?
: >
: >2) If GHWB actually was saying, in the aforementioned material,
: >what any clear-headed speaker of the English language would infer
: 
: 	All right, issue one- did George Bush say that atheists should not
: be U.S. citizens- the answer is no- What George Bush did say is that he is
: not sure- for those deficient in the Logic area, A statement that X is true
: is not the same as a statement that it is unknown if X is true. One is a
: statement of certainty the other is a statement of uncertainty, for those 
: with a brain, they are very different

Will, ol' buddy, you are taking a very un-nuanced view of things.
When a scientists says, "I'm not sure if Lambda Alpha Muons are the
building blocks of lemur thighs," he is expressing uncertainty.
When George Bush says, "No, I'm not sure that {atheists} should be
considered citizens," he is calling into question one of the basic
principles upon which this country was founded, that of religious 
freedom- which even in it's most conservative form, must be
interpreted to exclude religious tests for citizenship.  THIS IS
THE POINT!  Everybody has already conceded that the words "I'm not
sure" were included in the quote.  You score big points.  Now shut
up about it, and TELL US WHAT YOU THINK HE MEANT!

Thank You.

.
: 	Issue two- does GB have a poor understanding of the constitution, etc.
: This is slightly more complicated and for the time being I will leave it open.
: 
: >
: >Please either answer these questions or shutup and stop annoying
: >people with your young-republican inanities.
: 
: 	Is truth a young-republican inanity? If so, you'll just have to deal
: with being annoyed.
: 
: 
No, truth is a harsh mistress.  I do deal with being annoyed, thank
you very much.  I've been annoyed for the last twelve years.  Now
I'm slightly less annoyed.  But not much.  

h
: >Bill
: 	With a name like that, you should know better.

And I do.  Just ask me.
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Melvin's Proud- who is this Andy Twerp?
Date: 17 Nov 92 19:04:02 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton

In article <BxJHoH.Mpr@cmptrc.lonestar.org>, andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
> (Andy Fart) writes:
 
> OK, Melvin Millard.  It's nice that you've come out of your shell and all.
> I feel like you're my own bastard son.  You know, watching you come along
> since your first toddling alt.flame steps and all...  BUT!

*To reiterate a previously posted sentiment: Who the fuck is this Andy guy?
Never heard of ya pal.  What can he possibly mean by he watched Melvin come out
of his shell?  Even if Melvin did come out of his shell, how could this
net.nubie.punk have witnessed anything if he didn't crawl out of his fucking
Texass cowpie home and start posting the cowshit he lives in until a month
ago?  I know Melvin's been here since at least June.
 
> This damn sig is getting on my nerves.  I'm gonna have to drag your butt
> over to alt.flame.gigantic.sigs (or whatever the hell it's called) and 
> rough you up pretty soon.

*What are you going to do to rough him up, jerk him off with the same piece of
sandpaper that you use?  

> I mean, it *is* a funny name and all, but give it a rest.  

*This ANDY loudmouth is so precocious you'd swear he must think he's the second
CUMMING of Christ.  Here, Andy, let my give you a tissue to wipe yourself up
with.  No, you can keep it.  Now crawl back under your tumbleweed and blow away.

				                Fuckyou very much,
						Troll of Pa.
> -- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper)
Subject: The evil has just begun...
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:55:34 GMT

	Awwww, K e n, come back. I promise that in my future flames I'll
keep the reading level to second grade or less so you can understand
them too. I've even got some extra spaces for you...

K                             e                           n

If that doesn't get him to come running, I don't know what
will. As for Bruce, I'll just say there's nothing more amazing than a
rubber stamp that types too. Too bad it isn't being put to better use.

	Now is someone going to respond to this, or do I have to flame
myself _AGAIN_?

Tep--No spaces required
-- 
I'm too sexy for meiosis.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: cpassare@nyx.cs.du.edu (Charles Passarelli)
Subject: Re: The Moral Majority is Neither
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 05:40:27 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.201048.5552@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barr
) writes:
>In article <1992Nov11.151548.2282@newstand.syr.edu> isr@rodan.acs.syr.ed
 (Michael S. Schechter - ISR group account) writes:
>>>In article <1992Nov11.034944.22206@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn 
ar
>>>Tell the parents of kids that have been victimized by the very sort of
>>>person that likes to look at those photos your meaningless opinions.
>>
>>Well, it's like any other thing- it can be abused..
>
>	Shit. Guess I need to look in on the boring, brain-dead world of
>alt.flame more often. Schechter, you pus-filled sore, I didn't write the
>censorious nonsense you attribute to me, it was written by a juvenile
>loser who styles himself "Uncle Fester". _I_ flamed _him_ for it.
>
>	Don't bother to apologize, I won't accept it, and it's too late
>anyway, since I've put a contract out on you.
>
>						Kayembee


Well, the attribution was wrong, as you said.
But speaking of 'brain-dead', perhaps you should go back over
ol' Fester's posts and try _reading_ them this time.
Nothing he said was 'censorious nonsense'.  All he said was that
nekkid pictures of little 10 year old girls don't belong in the
a.b.p.erotica group.  He may have been a tad emotional, but 'censorious'?
I think not.  Hardly the type of stuff that someone you refer to as
a 'juvenile loser' would post.  Do you like 10 year old girls, or what?
And why do you feel a need to look at them in an erotica group?
Your flame of Uncle Fester was pretty feeble, at _best_.

What are you supposed to be styled as, a toy store? [Kayembee]
What a dork.

-Charles

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: K e n--Fundie, or just idiotic?
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:28:02 GMT

In article <1992Nov22.173219.15183@Princeton.EDU> datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
>	It's all so clear now. Garrett Cress has pointed out that K e n
>suffers from terminal megalomania.

K e n does not suffer from such diseases, for K e n applies standard
hygiene procedures when required.

> In addition, K e n constantly makes
>references to vague "information", although when pressed to provide
>information, he waffled and called the request "irrelevant." (Thanks to
>Lefty for pointing this out)

Lefty's request was denied, for it was a useless, irrelevant task. Such
information is not required. K e n has provided all pertinent information
pertaining to queries made of K e n.

> Further, he states without proof that there
>is an Afterlife--no specific mention of Heaven or Hell, although I
>suspect that the so-called "misinformed" would not be eligible for his
>version of Heaven. (Gee, K e n--wouldn't it get lonely up there all by
>yourself?)

It is not known as to what the Afterlife is made of. The only 
scientific evidence are accounts of individuals returning from
the Afterlife, for they had arrived prematurely. The Bible does
make references to an Afterlife, as do many other religious
scripts from the past from a variety of cultures. Thus K e n cannot
comment on the details of Afterlife, other than it is a transformation
from death in our dimension, and that it actually exists.

> Given these facts, and his single-minded fanaticism towards
>conversion of the "misinformed", leads me to suspect that K e n is
>actually a raving fundamentalist of his own narcissistic cult.

Incorrect. K e n is K e n.

>	Evidence, K e n! We need more evidence!

You have received your evidence.

K e n   R o b i n s o n

Newsgroups: alt.flame,rec.humor
From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Where's K e n?
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:20:19 GMT

In article <1992Nov22.232503.22093@muddcs.claremont.edu> weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
>In article <By4MEy.7nx@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov21.004821.29696@muddcs.claremont.edu> weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
>>>In article <By10uo.6F1@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>In article <lefty-191192131019@lefty.apple.com> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>>>>>In article <Bxxyzu.KFE@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu
>>>>>(Kenneth J Robinson) wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> K e n always has information handy whenever it is required...
>>>>>
>>>>>Say, F'Ken, I need to know the value of Planck's constant in the
>>>>>furlong/fortnight/hundredweight system.  D'you have _that_ handy?
>>>>
>>>>The information for which you have requested is irrelevant, thus K e n
>>>>does not have it handy. Your request has been denied.
>>>>
>>>	Is K e n saying he won't inform us? The world must be coming to an 
>>>end.
>>
>>Irrelevant information is exactly that, irrelevant. There is no need
>>to inform people of irrelevant data. It serves no purpose. Thus, K e n
>>will inform you with relevant information. 
>
>	I think the difference between that information and what you have
>told us so far is in fact that it would be relevant. You could actually use
>it to solve equations. The information you have thus far given us could serve
>no such purpose.

I have not given any information for Planck's constant under
useless units. It is irrelevant. If you wish to seek irrelevant information
then do so during your free time.

>>The world is not coming to
>>an end. You have been informed.
>
>	More irrelevant information, I mean really, If the world were ending,
>what could I do about it?

Prepare for it.

>	K e n, you have yet to explain exactly what it is you are trying to
>inform us of. The only thing you have really informed us of is that you are
>here to inform us. Sounds rather circular to me.

I am informing you that you are misinformed. If you wish to discuss
other pertinent forms of information, then query K e n.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 15 Nov 92 12:51:35 GMT
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
> 	No one fully understands the Constitution. It is a very controversial
> document.

Actually, it's a very simple and straightforward document by comparison with,
say, the Maastricht Treaty.  It's only "controversial" in the sense that the
US government does not want to implement it.

> What do you think the Supreme court is for?

The Supreme Court is there to decide which bits of the Constitution the
government is allowed to ignore, of course.


mathew
-- 
"Boy, they were big on crematoriums weren't they?"
 -- George Bush, during a tour of Auschwitz, 1987-09-28
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: about your votes . . .
Date: 23 Nov 1992 15:08:06 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <Bxo0t5.LI5@cmptrc.lonestar.org>,
andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>In article <1992Nov12.165309.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>> ... No matter, in your hearts and in mine we will both always know I was
>>the winner and when the poll is said and done, I'll go on kicking your asses,
>>business as usual.
>>                               Troll
  puhLEEEZE, is he still going on about this?  i gotcher pole for
ya, right here, about 10', here, let me help you insert it!  aaah,
that's much better

>
>You are living on fantasy island, loser.
>Get a life, Tatoo.
  troll: 'zee flame!  zee flame!'

>
>-- Andy
moi
>>--|>
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: troll masturbates all over Slobson.
Date: 20 Nov 92 16:13:21 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>*Listen, Rob Slobson, before you were ever a newbie here in playland with this
> scabby rabble, I was writing political satire for a subscriber list 50+ names
> long.  

Troll neglects to mention that all 50+ names were his own. 

> And when you were just breaking wind with your first indignant post, I
> was getting thrown off of channel insult on IRC because the pansy moderators
> couldn't beat me.  

We don't doubt that you were thrown off.  Just your rationalization of why.

> So, when I post, I do you the service of allowing you to
> observe my form so that you can better your own.  No thanx necessary.

Yes, it is instructive to study other's mistakes.

> All you do is post here and then tell each other how poorly you did in
> comparison to each other, pretty pointless.   
>

Eh?  This coming from Take-a-Poll-Troll?

>				Ta Ta for Now
>
>				Troll  ha hahahahaha!

-- Andy
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Melvin's Proud- who is this Troll Twerp?
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:07:23 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>> (Andy Fart) writes:

  HA!  This is really great.  No kidding, jerkwad.  I haven't heard this
  since elementary school.  Way to go.  

>*To reiterate a previously posted sentiment: Who the fuck is this Andy guy?

  Asked and answered elsewere, you mental midget.

>Never heard of ya pal.  What can he possibly mean by he watched Melvin come out
>of his shell?  Even if Melvin did come out of his shell, how could this
>net.nubie.punk have witnessed anything if he didn't crawl out of his fucking
>Texass cowpie home and start posting the cowshit he lives in until a month
>ago?  I know Melvin's been here since at least June.

  [keegan-darcy style]  Can you post proof of this?  If you're not willing
  to substantiate your allegations, will you publicly post an apology?
  Shithead.

>> This damn sig is getting on my nerves.  I'm gonna have to drag your butt
>> over to alt.flame.gigantic.sigs (or whatever the hell it's called) and 
>> rough you up pretty soon.
>
>*What are you going to do to rough him up, jerk him off with the same piece of
>sandpaper that you use?  

  You mean the sandpaper I use to clean your pug face when you're done 
  blowing me?

>
>> I mean, it *is* a funny name and all, but give it a rest.  
>
>*This ANDY loudmouth is so precocious you'd swear he must think he's the second
>CUMMING of Christ.  Here, Andy, let my give you a tissue to wipe yourself up
>with.  No, you can keep it.  Now crawl back under your tumbleweed and blow away.

  *yawn*
>
>				                Fuckyou very much,
>						Troll of Pa.
>> -- Andy

  Hey fairy-tale-boy, I thought you only read replies to your own posts.
  Guess it's easier for you to flame me elsewhere than those posts where
  I've roasted your spoiled carcass.

  -- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: K E N is, as usual, wrong as rain
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:17:44 GMT

In article <BxxyCI.K1v@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>In article <1992Nov13.223722.29962@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>>> krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:

>>>K e n has not rented your canine pet. K e n sees no purpose in doing
>>>such an activity, thus K e n will not do it, and has not done it.
>>>It is quite obvious, as usual, that you are misinformed again. Please
>>>gather information next time before posting, for your information
>>>gathering techniques are pathetic and require much more practice.

>>K E N, while I understand your motivation in lying, I must inform the
>>alt.lame crowd that you have, in fact, rented my dog--or rather, rented
>>his services. I even have a cancelled check from you.

>Indeed, Mr. Dobson. Are you really this misinformed?? K e n does not
>require services rendered by canine creatures. K e n does not write out
>checks to misinformed individuals. K e n is K e n, and you are
>misinformed.

Deny it on the .net all you want, k e n, me n my dawg are laughing all
the way to the bank.


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: irvine@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Brent Irvine)
Subject: Re: To shitCANada and the Kanucks.
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:15:59 GMT

In article <okNHuB3w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
>jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>> Well Kanuck, at least my country isn't so dependent on foreign investment lik
>> your leech nation.
>
>Priceless.  Absolutely priceless.
>
>Which of these is the odd one out:
>
>   Burger King
>   Reebok
>   CBS Records

Don't mind him, he was just potty trained, thats why you see all this
shit on the screen.

-- 
+-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
| Brent L. Irvine         |These opinions are the opinions of the majority of |
| irvine@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu | space aliens currently in residence in the USA.   |
+-------------------------+---------------------------------------------------+
From: kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:19:50 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b64746.student.cwru.edu

In article <953@dsbc.icl.co.uk> kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
>Ok, so what if GB goes on national TV today and states that all atheists
>are fuckers and should be shit on sight, what are you going to do about
>it?  fire him.

	"shit on sight"? Very humorous imagry. I can imagine Mr. Bush 
telling his pilot of Air Force One to fly over all the athiests on the 
streets below, sticking his ass out the door and shitting. Oh, wait a 
minute, he has done so already. It was called the election campaign.

>Everybody has a right to their own opinion.  If he really wanted to collect
>all the passports from athiests and throw them out of the country, he had
>a good few years to get it done.  Why do you think he didn't do it?

	One, everyone has the right to their own opinion. However, there are
inappropriate times to express certain opinions. Would it be appropriate for 
the president to start showing doubt if Jews really ought not to be rounded 
up and exterminated? What if he said, "I don't know if Jews ought not to be 
herded like cattle, casterated, and then set to the gas chambers. After all, 
out nation does need lampshades. I don't know if they are citizens, nor if 
they ought to be treated as human beings." Notice, he never said that he 
felt that it ought to be done. However, his public show of doubt about the 
humanity of the Jews, and their right for constitutional protection would be 
damaging to the Jews. Mr. Bush's remarks have caused harm amoung the athiest 
community, from individual anguish to giving legitamacy to bashing athiesm. 

	As for you next lines, it is non sequitar. Most US citizens do not 
have a passport. If you are not leaving the nation ( except for Canada, the 
Bahamas, etc ), you don't ever need one. My FL driver's liscence is a valid 
enough for of ID, thank you. So, why would he try to take away all these 
passports? 

	The main reason of why he hasn't attempted to throw them out, is 
that he recognizes that he has no legitimate authority to do so. However, 
his support of peer-forcing athiests to pray in public schools, HAVE been 
damaging to the athiest community. Thank god, the SC has struck any 
attempts down!

>>PS: I'm happy to find that nobody has flamed my .sig (yet).>

	Too obvious.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,rec.humor
From: datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper)
Subject: Where's K e n?
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 03:25:31 GMT

	Damn, that was too easy getting rid of K e n. I guess he didn't
have enough information to demolish my last post, so as a public service
I'll do it for him.

	Tep, you have been seriously misinformed about my existence or
nonexistence. K e n is K e n is K e n, and K e n cannot be otherwise.
You posted that since K e n cannot be otherwise, he cannot be existant.
However, that also means that K e n cannot be nonexistant.
	Ka-BLAMMM!! yourself, dickwad.

	Well, so much for that. Pity. I was beginning to enjoy watching
K e n running for cover. Well, if nobody has anthing else to say, I
guess I'll be moving on.

Tep
-- 
I'm too sexy for meiosis.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:01:50 GMT

 bufalini@cattycorner.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
 rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:

>>do you do this so ken will continue to let your give him rim jobs?
>
>No, I did it to correct Tilden.
>

But admit it--continued rim job WERE a factor in your decision, were'nt
they? Or do you honestly expect us to believe you can be fair and impartial
when it comes to K e n, with whom you are so involved?
From: liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: K e n has amused me...(Was Re: <something stupid>)
Date: 20 Nov 1992 16:13:53 GMT
Organization: WPI - so much stress we're giving it away!
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <Bxz6qr.CCF@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@aquamarine.crayola.cs.psu.edu 
(Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>
>It appears as if Tilden, The Wonder Dung, is incapable of accepting his
>error. 
>

K e n has finally made me laugh.  


ObFlame:  Time to create alt.fan.warlord.no-cliques, because this inner-
circle stuff is a bunch of elitist, fascist crap.  Assholes.


						--Liz

::::::::::::::::::::                                     :::::::::::::::::
 Liz Stewart      ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Today's Mood
 liz@wpi.wpi.edu :   "Her mind is Tiffany twisted..."      :   neener
 lizzie at GNU  :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::   neener
::::::::::::::::                                             :::::::::::::
From: krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: K e n Does Not Require Teammates (was Re: Worthless)
Date: 22 Nov 92 16:36:52 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1992Nov20.222158.25253@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>> cress@endeavor.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress) masturbates then ejaculates:
>
>>						the gmeister
>>						get used to it
>
>what, you mean get used to another borng loser with a dumb nickname?
>
>or get used to another asshole with ksu.ksu.edu as your site?
>
>perhaps you and that other snot-nosed kansan tilden can be bigger assholes
>than Bruce and Ken, tag-team assholes from penn state

K e n is not the member of a tag team. K e n acts on K e n's will
only. K e n does not require teammates, for K e n can defend himself.
You, sir, are quite misinformed.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame