HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: 22302LMK@MSU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SIS: who's the oldest?
Date: 23 Nov 92 14:48:15 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University

------------------------- Original Article -------------------------
From: yvonne@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SIS: who's the oldest?
Date: 18 Nov 92 00:59:57 CST
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services


>
> The oldest is Georgie, followed by Alex, then Teddy then Frankie
>
> lisa

Do you have some documentation to back this up??? ;-) ;-)

>>DOCUMENTATION!!!!You betch, on one of the very first shows it was stated
the family order of the sisters.



I always thought for sure that the oldest is ALEX, followed by
Georgie, then Teddy, then Frankie.  I guess I am going more
by the actor's ages than the character's ages -- Alex definitely
LOOKS the oldest to me.

-Yvonne


>>True, Alex does look older, and in real life she is the oldest among all the
>>other actresses. But on the show Alex is the second oldest

Lisa
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mhr@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Mike Reaser)
Subject: Re: Y&R Brad & Lauren?! (Do they know...!) 
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:10:59 GMT
Organization: a stone mountain of Kudzu

In <1992Nov20.163609.14662@wes.on.ca> judim@wes.on.ca (Judi Mota) writes:

>In article <1992Nov19.094107.846@blurt.oswego.edu> tuttle@blurt.oswego.edu writes:
>>What the heck is Brad and Lauren doing in bed together yesterday (11/19)?!?!  I
>>just caught a glimpse of that hunk of a man in bed and couldn't figure out
>>who he was with -- then I see Lauren!  Give me a break!  The happy little
>>doctor's wife isn't so happy, even if she's got her baby!!!  First she's
>>sleeping with Paul, then with Brad, and she won't even sleep with her husband!

>Do you think anyone will mention to either Brad or Lauren that they could
>contact HIV - the virus that causes AIDS?  :)

Ahhhh...but they're not fifsixseventeen and "in luuuuuuuuuuv".

Remember -- anyone not "the young" is immune on this show.  1/2 :-)

--
=======================================================================
 Mike Reaser, Hewlett-Packard N. Amer. Response Center - Atlanta
 Internet:  mhr@hpuerca.atl.hp.com
 NBCS: B4 f w g+ k s-               I barely speak for myself, so
 #include <standard.disclaimer>       don't make me speak for HP
=======================================================================
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: ""I can resist anything but temptation"" <tburgess@us.oracle.com>
Subject: GH:  fact/fiction maybe...gossip...definitely
Original-To: amcnet
Organization: Computer Science, Indiana University
Original-Cc: pat
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 10:05:38 PST




*Posted for Pat Jablonski*

OH!! remember the other day when you said you
wondered if tiff was preggers in real life?
well, she has been sitting down alot, wearing
baggie stuff and the other day had a file folder
in from of her gut. BUT!! the best part is that
she is NOT married and guess who her best
friend is.....(i read it in epsiodes)

spoiler.......(maybe)  





Ken Shriner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!what if HE'S the
DADDDDDDDDDDDD!


Anyone else think that...from a gossip/rumor aspect of it?????
From: jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jennifer Allyson Turner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GH: Update for Fri 11/20/92
Date: 22 Nov 92 21:39:29 GMT
Organization: Sophomore, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

>Scene 18
>Tracy tells Jenny she has to become Ned's "perfect" wife.  If he wants
her give
>up her career, she will. If he wants her to have baby after baby, she
will, and
>she is never to look at Paul again, or she will slap her face over every
>newspaper in America.  [Give me a break. Would you take that?]

Hell, no!  What she should do (but most definitely won't do) is tell
Tracy to shove it, walk out and then tell Ned herself.  I wouldn't worry
about the Senator's career because, quite frankly, it's his own damn
fault.  Besides, he's not up for reelection for six more years.  It's
bound to have blown over by then.

>Scene 20
>At the court house, Tiffany tries to interview Jessica who is suspicious at
>first but then agrees to after the arraignment.  Tiffany then describes her
>situation with Lucas and asks how she might keep him. Jessica suggests
that she
>just don't give him up and make the Jones' sue for custody.  Everyone
begins to
>enter the courtroom, and Felicia is brought in.  Jessica lays out her
evidence,
>a weapon, a witness (Mac), and the defendant's own statement. Scott tries to
>plead self-defense but has no real evidence. The Judge finds sufficient
>evidence for a trial and sets bail at $60,000.

During this scene, I could just see Tiffany hiring Jessica to be her
lawyer.  Of course, that's impossible since Jessica's an ADA, but GH
would have found a way.  This means they'll have to bring in two new
characters (man for Julia?) to be the custody lawyers, as the only
lawyers in town will be tied up (no pun intended) with the
Stalker/Felicia case.

Jenn
From: mcmahon@nd.edu (Sheila M. McMahon)
Subject: Re: ATWT: meg/iva/error/lily
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 14:18:14 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.233720.25790@cs.wayne.edu> faa@athena.cs.wayne.edu (Felicitas A. Atabong) writes:

>In article <199211171528.AA67396@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU> Lois Therese Casaleggi <ltc2f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU> writes:
>>i have some comments and a question thats been bothering me for a
>>long time...
>>
>>first off, i just saw friday's show and didn't get to tape
>>monday's so i don't know what's happened in the meantime, but i
>>just have to say that meg is out of control! asking iva for her

>I will admit that what Meg asked of Iva was rather outrageous, but now I
>can understand how desperate she really is. I like Meg and sympathize
>with her a great deal. I like the fact that she doesn't suck up to the
                                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>slut like the rest of the Snyder family. Ellie's abortion and the slut's
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You have chrystlized my thoughts eloquently!! She was hilarious on Monday, 
getting in her little "digs" against Joolie. Everyone gets mad at her for
not keeping her cool, but she is the only one who is reacting honestly, and
the only one who thinks it is wrong to coddle Queen Lily. I was surprised 
that she didn't wig out at Ellie. I thought she would. But, she remained 
pretty calm. She said that she thought Ellie was wrong not to tell Kirk, but
given the circumstances surrounding the pregnancy, she understood Ellie's 
decision. She even admitted that given her and Josh's inablility to conceive,
that she wasn't able to be totally objective about the situation. 

This is what I like about Meg. She's so unpredictable. Here, I was sure she
would fly off the handle about Ellie's abortion, but she didn't.


>>
>>my second comment has confused me for a while.  i may just be
>>being dense but i never saw what the HUGE deal was about keeping
>>the truth from lily.  i have no doubt that news like that would
>>be painful, but she already knew that holden and julie had slept
>>together; holden told her everything that he knew, so it was

I agree with this also. If they would have just told her the truth before 
they got married, it wouldn't have been such a big deal. Why do all these 
people forget that Holden DID NOT betray Lily by sleeping with Julie. He 
was married to Angel at the time. They also act as though that were the only
reason they went through this lie. To me, I think the bigger concern should
have been that Caleb and Holden were at each other's throats at the time and
this threatened to destroy their relationship. This reason isn't even 
mentioned anymore.

Irish
From: AWP00JTF@UNCCVM.UNCC.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Am I the only one???
Date: 17 Nov 92 16:28:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: UNCCVM.168A2A165.AWP00JTF
Organization: UNC Charlotte

In article <199211161335.AA22785@donne.unx.sas.com>
alex@unx.sas.com (Alexandra Bost) writes:
 
>ilene@spss.com (Ilene France) writes:
>>
>>In article <20885@fritz.filenet.com> bartosch@fritz.filenet.com (Diane M. Bartosch) writes:
 
 
 
 
>>>Is anyone else out there totally bored with the Dim/Erica scenes?  I've
>>>gotten so that I can watch AMC in less then 30 minutes FF'ing though their
>>>scenes.
>>>
>>  No, you're not the only one!!!  Dim and Erica are completely
>>  boring.  Why are supposed to believe that they are sooo in
>>  love anyway?  What is their relationship based on?  Their
>>  conversations seem to consist of, "Oh, Dmitri!" "Oh, Erica!"
>>  Kiss, kiss.
 
Well, I was glad to read these posts becuase I thought I was the only
one who has been bored with this whole thing.  I think Dimitri is
obnoxious and the whole thing just ridiculous.  I too, now FF through
most of AMC and some days I don't even bother to watch it at all.
The whole Dimitri/Edmund story line is boring, IMHO, and even Brook who
I used to love to watch has become as dull as dishwater.
Even the other storylines are not up to AMC's usual standards and
while I know that soaps move slowly, AMC is CRAWLING and dragging
everything out forever.  Oh, well, just my opinion.  :) - Judy
From: llmacdon@orion.oac.uci.edu (Linda Macdonald)
Subject: AMC:  Nick and Nora
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 23 Nov 92 17:12:17 GMT

I have several of "The Thin Man" movies in my collection and Nick
and Nora were played by William Powell and Myrna Loy.  They were a
great team.  I just love watching them in action.  It was an extremely
popular series of movies (6 in all), so there may have been remakes
later and Peter Lawford may have starred in one of them.  Does anyone
know for sure.

Linda Lou
From: GC.AVW@forsythe.stanford.edu (RAGIN CAJUN)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC : Kidnapping tips
Date: 20 Nov 1992 02:10:14 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <102623@bu.edu>,
mjmh@crsa.bu.edu (Michael J M Holmes) writes:
>In article <1992Nov19.181647.5382@cbnewsc.cb.att.com> dwv@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (Dave Vollman) writes:
>
>>No kidnapper worth their salt would use a cellphone anyway. First,
>>anyone with a scanner can hear you. Second it's easier for the phone company
>>to trace, since you can easily tell what the originating cell is and
>>how far the origination is away from the office (and I think they can
>>do direction within + or - 5 degrees). This gives
>>a relatively limited area of where you could be. They still use pay phones,
>>since line based phones are a little harder to trace.
>
>Hey, Dave, thanks for the info!!
>
>(Please note: I am *not* planning to kidnap anybody!)
>
>But, since Dave seems to be a 'source' - I've been wondering
>about the old tried-and-true soap kidnapper's call routine -
>y'know, where they *have* to keep him chatting for 30 seconds or
>they can't trace him?  It seems like this hasn't changed since
>the '70s!!
>
>Is this true?  Hasn't technology made it easier/faster to
>trace calls?  I would *hope* this would be true, but even
>in prime-time shows this call-tracing time-limit still seems
>to be in effect.
>
This is still true in real time.  Whenever we need a number traced
for ER we have to go through shit just to get the police to do
anything about a potential suicide.  But they can now get phones
with the display on them and I think our ER will be getting these
the first of the year.

>Anyway, just wanted to know!
>
>(Really, I am *NOT* planning to kidnap anybody!  I'm just
>a really curious person!!!)
>
(Mutley voice on)yea, yea, yea, sure, sure, sure (Mutley voice
off);^).

>mike
>

Alma
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: ac@cheshire.oxy.edu (Aileen Cho)
Subject: Re: ATWT: duhH exposed!
Organization: Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041 USA.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 09:33:54 GMT


  Hutch? Humph! I want Linc back.  Maybe if he got back together with
Connor then Snott, I mean, Scott, would come to his senses.  The idea
of him doing the wild thing with Lucy is scarier than when she did it
with Craig. Remember that? Euuugggh.
                                                 --ac

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jackie8@dasher.cc.bellcore.com ()
Subject: Re: HF: Is it on Tonight?
Organization: Bellcore - Piscataway, NJ
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 21:13:01 GMT

In article <8358@lhdsy1.lahabra.chevron.com> njs@mrtoad.lahabra.chevron.com writes:
>In article <libajm.722187875@gsusgi1.gsu.edu>, libajm@gsusgi2.gsu.edu (Amy J. McCormack) writes:
>|> jackie8@dasher.cc.bellcore.com () writes:
>|> 
>|> >Is it on tonight? The episode that's supposed to be
>|> >on next is the dancing episode from the first season,
>|> >right?
>|> 
>|>   I think there is a new episode on tonight, the dancing episode 
>|>   will be on Thanksgiving night.
>|> -- 
>
>A lurker here - HF is being pre-empted for Matlock tonite 

Hiya lurker! HOORAY! Thanks for letting me know!  At least I
won't miss *one* of my favorite shows while I'm gone this weekend.
:-) :-)

Have a nice holiday everybody!
(Such a general greeting, isn't it. oh well.)

:-)

Jackie
---
Jackie Brady/jackie8@cc.bellcore.com/908-699-5458 (insert usual disclaimer)     (do not reply to the address in "From:" section. Use id in .sig to reply)
[] Bell Communications Research / Piscataway NJ
From: susan@wpi.WPI.EDU (susan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GH: GH contest mentioned on tv
Date: 17 Nov 1992 14:19:03 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu

In article <9211162042.AA17487@oracle.us.oracle.com> ""I can resist anything but temptation"" <tburgess@us.oracle.com> writes:
>
>Last Wednesday I happened to catch the morning
>show ``Home''.  At the beginning of the show
>they mentioned a contest (but said to stay
>tuned during the week for more details).   The
>contest has to do with who you would most like
>to play a love scene with on GH.  It was so

  
    I'd pick scotty - he is the only guy 
    on gh with anything interesting going
    for him....   

    i like his hair too :-)

sue

  ()   Internet:           <*<*<*<*<*<*<*<*<**>*>*>*>*>*>*>*>
  /\   susan@wpi.wpi.edu    Don't blame it on me,
 /  ) . . _   __. __          blame it on my wild heart....
/__/_(_/_/_)_(_(_/) )_                             -S. Nicks
*<*<*<*<*<*<*<*<*<*<*<*<*<*<**>*>*>*>*>*>*>*>*>*>*>*>*>*>*>*>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: harding@sun444.nas.nasa.gov (Steve Harding)
Subject: Re: Soaps into seperate newsgroups
Organization: NASA/Ames Research Center
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 22:09:13 GMT
Distribution: usa

In article <1ejhqoINN6im@male.EBay.Sun.COM> warriors@eb5ts4.EBay.Sun.COM (Dave Maycon) writes:
>How can Read News be changed to making each individual soap into seperate
>newsgroups.  I think it would be easier just to put our little two cents
>into our favorite newsgroup.  Why don't someone take the time out and
>do everyone a favor
>
>DJM

Here we go again.  Marg...Is this a part of the FAQ?

steve
-- 
work:harding@nas.nasa.gov   play:steveh@grafex.Cupertino.CA.US (408.252.0578)
              A prince trapped in the body of a dirty old man.
From: crl0195@hertz.njit.edu (Curt R Lindmark)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB--poll
Date: 16 Nov 92 22:23:10 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Nov12.154435.18480@u.washington.edu> dias@cac.washington.edu (Vivian Dias ) writes:

 [Vivian's oligatory scathing reply mercifully deleted]

I apolgize to all the SB'ers, not for being forced to bear witness to this 
wonderful verbal parrying in which our esteemed West Coaster (holding drinks 
now?) and myself partake, but for the academic landslide that has covered my 
schedule at present.  Rest assured, my obligatory scathing reply to Vivian is 
forthcoming just as soon as I attend to my duties.

O========|>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<|========0
 Curt R Lindmark      crl0195@hertz.njit.edu         Defender from ages past
"Curt, you must be the most arrogant and obnoxious man I know.  I love it."
				-Vivian Dias
Disclaimer: NJIT is responsible for nothing I don't say which isn't mine.
From: kreuille@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (kristina marie reuille)
Subject: Re: ATWT: Trivia #6
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:18:32 GMT

In article <mcmahon.159@nd.edu> mcmahon@nd.edu (Sheila M. McMahon) writes:
>Here we go again folks...
>
>
>1) Who delivered Christopher Hughes?

Casey Peretti - this is why he was Chris' god father

>2) Who told Lily that Iva and Josh were her biological parents?

Ivagottatellthissecret did when she thought that josh was attacking lily in
Juicy's stables

>3) Where did Iva and Kirk meet for the first time?

On an airplane- Kirk was being a jerk

>4) Who bankrolled Tonio so that he was able to buy Montgomery and Associates,
>   and later start Reyes Management?

Your favorite villain and mine... James Stenbeck

>5) Through what company was the money laundered by the above person so that 
>   Tonio could buy Montgomery Associates and later start Reyes Management?
Kruger Industries?

>6) Who owns WOAK
Kim and that other TV type dude, they bought it when tonio went under

>7) Who killed Corinne Lawrence?
dont remember

>8) What was found in the wall of the nursery of Tom and Margo's house?
some sort of a box or something having to do with some big mystery, but i dont remember what it was.

>9) What was Craig and Sierra's "song"?
dont remember... but i wish i did

>10) What is the name of Lyla's sister?
Her other daughter is Cricket, but i have no idea what her sister's name is

>Enjoy,
>Irish


-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
| Kristina M. Reuille      || If you really wanted to know... || Go           |
| kreuille@ucs.indiana.edu || Why didn't you just ask?        || HOOSIERS!!!! |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: dias@cac.washington.edu (Vivian Dias )
Subject: Re: SB: mini convention
Keywords: Trivia Pursuit
Organization: UW Computing
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:33:35 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.134110.12761@cbnewsh.cb.att.com>, saj@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (john.suravlas) writes:
> This is the New Jersey delegation (Joyce Jonk, Curt Lindmark, John Suravlas)
> reporting in. We all met for lunch yesterday at Friendlys and we decided that
> we are a fantastic bunch and we wouldn't mind traveling together for eight
> hours in a car to get to Suzannes's house. So, YES - we ARE coming!!

  Well the Pacific Northwest contingent found a dirt cheap airfare to
  Pittsburg this weekend and will be arriving in Pittsburg 1/15...
> 

> 1. Nelson, if you want to join us, get in touch with me via email and we can
> make arrangements.

  Nelson, if you do decide to go let me know what character you would like
  to play...
> 
 
> 4. Vivian, let me tell you about Curt. He is the perfect gentleman. He was
> opening doors all over the place. As we were walking out of the restaurant,
> Joyce was talking and he would not turn his back to her. He walked
> backwards - WHAT A GUY!!
> 
> He has the same eyes as the Babester - I'm sure that will make you jump
> for joy.

  Oh dear, I blush, I smile coyly...


  -Vivian
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: riddle@bach.udel.edu (Tammy Riddle)
Subject: Re: DOOL:  how did Vivian sucker Victor
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 18:33:20 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.152901.1129@chpc.utexas.edu> Joanna L. Castillo <pefv702@sunray.pe.utexas.edu> writes:
>>Amy Moseley Rupp wrote:
>>>>How did Vivian sucker Victor into helping her escape with Nicky?
>>>>Or is he really suckered into it?  Isn't he the one who's big
>>>>on knowing his kids?
>>>
>>> Rick Morris replied:
>>>Oh old Vic wasn't suckered the way I saw it.  She told him she
>>>didn't want Nicky to find out who his real father was, and Vic
>>>remembered Bo's difficulty with the same thing.  But I could see
>>>in his eyes that he wasn't suckered....Gotta love Vic!
>
>And then Amy Moseley Rupp wrote again:
>
>>Well, that's true that Bo had a hard time finding out his real father...
>>but Victor and Caroline always knew that Bo was theirs, and they made
>>the decision to withhold the information...well maybe Victor didn't
>>know for sure, but whatever.  Lawrence & Carly had their kid STOLEN
>>from them...the new, moral Victor certainly couldn't condone that.
>>Either he's got something up his sleeve, or there's some big
>>incongruity here...I don't buy the bit about Bo.
>
>Hi, Amy!
>
>It's good to see you're still around.  :)  I think the main argument 
>Viv used was that Larry didn't really know *how* to love anyone (this
>is the same argument Larry is using against Viv with Carly, btw) and so 
>she kept Nikki from him because she knew he'd make a terrible father.  
>She was very careful not to tell Victor that Carly is Nikki's real 
>mother.  She seems to think that Victor wouldn't continue to help her 
>if he knew about Carly -- and I think she's right.  Anyway, the fact 
>that he's snowed is pretty lame but at least the fact that he's going
>to help Viv is a small sign that the old Victor is still around.  
>Afterall, if he'll go to such lengths to keep a child from his real 
>father, he can't be all good, can he?  :)
>
>>Amy Moseley Rupp			Mother to Elizabeth AnneMarie,
>>amym@oakhill.sps.mot.com		born 11/4/92 
>
>Congrats on Elizabeth AnneMarie!  :)
>
>Joanna.
>
>--
>| \____ ----- ____/           |  "Let's just be friends -- friends    |
>|      ( o o )                |  who never talk or see each other."   |
>|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    |      - David Letterman, 7-22-92       |
>|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! |         pefv702@sunray.pe.utexas.edu  |



Well, as I told Amy via e-mail, my feeling on this whole thing is Victor
may be trying to play Vivian and Lawrence against each other.  To me it is
another way that Victor can get at Lawrence for the sake of his grandson
and son-in-law.  Lawrence may become very distraught over the whereabouts
of his son, and not be so concerned with the matters of business.  Just my
.50 worth.

--Peachie

-- 
**************************************************************************
I always have THOUGHTS about anything;      * Tammy Riddle - U of Delaware 
 However, SOLUTIONS might be another story! * riddle@brahms.udel.edu 
**************************************************************************
From: sally@remarque.berkeley.edu (S. A. Wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: TAN - Posters Appear In Book, Kind Of
Date: 20 Nov 1992 18:02:39 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Nov20.001220.3384@panix.com> spira@panix.com (Greg "Sarcasm Is A Way Of Life" Spira) writes:
>
>
>The sample screen in the book included these lines:
>
>d S. A. Winslow       143  >>>DOOL: Friday 10th of January
>f S. A. Winslow        18  >>>DOOL: One Stormy Night Update
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Geez, I guess I should be honored....
>i Liz Wolf		?  >DOOL: please clear some things up
>j Liz Wolf		?  >>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is this for real? Greg are you putting a joke over on us?
>k Jason Castillo       15  >>
   ^^^^^
"Jason?"  "Jason" Now I love it. So Peels, the truth is out. Lemon,
has been lying to us all along. Now I know why she took that trip to
Sweden last summer. So, now that we know you really are a Core, what
name are you going to take. HAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHHA. You made my day Greg.

>
>Now, the names have been slightly changed, but it's fairly obvious who the
>real posters are.  (I left out the non -DOOL posters who were listed) 
>
>Anyway, I just thought you all would want to know.
>
>Greg 

So, Banana, and "Jason," I think we should get some compensation for
this. I know that the operation must have been quite expensive.


Spdunix--

The UC Davis Aggies will not win this week's post-season game.
The UC Davis Aggies will not win this week's post-season game.





-- 
Amore e 'l cor gentil sono una cosa,	   |||	 Sally A. Wilson
  si come il saggio in suo dittare pone	   |||	 Spudnix Peel
  e cosi esser l'una sanza l'altro osa     |||	 sally@mica.berkeley.edu
  com'alma razional sanza ragione.  [_Vita_Nova_ XX, Dante]