HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: ***APOLOGY*** (kindly read me)
Date: 27 Sep 92 16:44:15 GMT
Organization: insert anything here

Minotaur@cup.portal.com (Frank - Swilling) writes:

	Lots more insults --- but then again that's his forte.
You *really* should take them to alt.flame - that *is* why
the newsgroup exists...

	Now for the part you REALLY aren't expecting.

	I sit corrected.  I had not placed the manager of the GBLO*
Film List as you.  I suppose I figured that the person doing that
couldn't possibly be so constantly nasty in all his other affairs.

	I guess I was wrong about that too.

BBC, who only had to admit
that error --- Frank on 
the other hand has lots of
insults to explain...
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: bfjeld@sisters.cs.uoregon.edu (Bjorn S. Fjeld Pettersen)
Subject: Oregon gay rights group needs help!
Organization: University of Oregon Computer and Information Sciences Dept.
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 06:02:23 GMT

OUTPAC (Oregonians United Together - PAC) is a group in Oregon that is 
working to defeat ballot measure 9. For those of you who don't know about
ballot measure 9, it is the referendum put forward by the extreme right wing 
in Oregon. If ballot measure 9 passes it will leagally require the government 
to discriminate against lesbians, bisexuals and gay men in Oregon. 
	In recent weeks, OUTPACs office has been vandalized and burglerized 
several times. The moral is low. Money was stolen, property was damaged, data 
on the computer was erased. OUTPAC needs everyones support right now. OUTPAC 
is currently in need of a Hercules Graphics Card for the computer they work 
on, in addition it would help if they could get a hold of a voice mail card. 
If you have one of these that you are not using, consider donating it, or 
selling it at a low price to OUTPAC. You can contact OUTPAC at (503) 687-9226.
Please don't respond to this account (unless you really want to of course :)

Bjorn.
From: dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Ah, Fashion.
Date: 2 Oct 92 16:14:47 GMT
Reply-To: dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
Organization: sgi
NNTP-Posting-Host: tattoo.mti.sgi.com

In article <15842@umd5.umd.edu>, jns@elea.umd.edu (J. N. Shaumeyer) writes:
 
|> A rather remarkable otter of my acquaintance,
|> to whom I have alluded on occasion, had occasion
|> once to shave his body.  ["Something to do", I
|> think, was the stated reason; apparently the
|> shaving being the point of the exercise, rather
|> than shaved being the goal.] 

As someone who regularly gets involved in shaving scenes, I must say
that having your entire body shaved in a scene is rather wonderful.

|> 
|> Now, lamentable though it may have been that he
|> shaved, my experience with body stubble is not
|> something I'll soon forget, nor is the smile I
|> get from that memory one that will soon fade.


I must add that one of the reasons I like shaving my head is so that
I can rub my stubble on the man in my bed....


I don't know about shaving for vanity, but shaving for sexual pleasure?
Abso-fucking-lutely.


FWA
From: ts@cup.portal.com (Tim W Smith)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: WILSON *VETOES* Comprehensive Civil Rights Bill AB3825
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 13:44:31 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

> There WAS a Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1992 that WAS a full civil rights
> bill for Queers [as well as disabled, women, race, religion, etc] and Wilson
> vetoed it today...

What civil rights are lacking based on race and religion?  Why was a
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1992 needed for any of the above groups
other than Queers?

--Tim Smith
From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Ah, Fashion.
Date: 5 Oct 92 18:38:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: spdcc.1992Oct5.183845.22798
Organization: insert anything here

ro@panix.com (r l reid) writes:
>dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) writes:
>>This perennial fashion tirade comes around like clockwork, usually
>>when Bob needs to get new flannel shirts at Sears and when he doesn't
>>feel like working on his thesis.

>I have a fashion tip for Bob - if you buy some decent quality flannel
>shirts instead of the $10 Sears ones, you won't have to buy them nearly
>as often.
>

	2 years?  Sometimes more?  That's $0.01/day/shirt.
Plus there's the problem with discretionary income.  My clothes budget
for the year is < $200.  I haven't had to go anywhere naked yet.

>Then we don't have to have this discussion nearly as often.

	Aw, can't keep revising a useful defense?  [Sorry - couldn't
resist...]  copmpared to other ongoing "threads" this one really
doesn['t stack up.

>What you may mistake for "fashion" may simply be a person who has learned
>that sometimes you get what you pay for and that there is something to be
>said for quality.  

	Duh.  I think that Jess' posting made that point abundantly
clear.  And he didn't hear any dissent from me.  On your point
though perhaps what a lot of people need to learn is that $$$ doesn't
equal quality.  The best situation, and sane person would agree, is
finding something of quality without having to pay with the shirt on
your back... (pun, of course, intended).

BBC
From: Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: CABAL stuff
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 20:18:19 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

Ry Schwark snivels:
>In article <1992Sep28.150043.9025@panix.com> ro@panix.com (r l reid) writes:
>>MOTSS CABAL, NO MORE CHINESE FOOD DIVISION 
>
>I knew you were a *PERVERT*, but I had no idea you were so depraved. 
>Unless you meant you wanted to have Thai instead.

Absolutely not.  I vote for Italian.  A nice plate of pasta would
be perfect.

 
() What sane person could live in this world and not be
() crazy?
()      -- Ursula LeGuin
-----
[> George D. Madison | NBCS: B8f+t+w-e+s+k+a!cv | Just say NO to razors! <]
[> It's a BEAR thing -- you wouldn't understand. <|> furr@cup.portal.com <]
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: buckmr@lib110.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire)
Subject: Re: Kentucky Sodomy Law Repealed??
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 19:55:51 GMT

buckmr@marcus.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire) writes:


>There was a message posted to the ACT-UP mailing list claiming that the 
>Kentucky Supreme Court voted 4-3 to repeal theier same-sex only sodomy law.
Apparently it's true.

What is strange is that I'm not sure if the tally of free states has actually
increasec because I already had Kentucky's law as being struck down by the court
[source: LLDEF, December 21, 1990 New York Times]. They also have Texas' law as
struck down, even though that hasn't gone all the way to their State Supreme
Court.

I imagine this is the reason for the discrepancy in numbers between 9 and 6
that NEWSWEEK has as still having same-sex sodomy laws, and my recoords.
The six are: Missouri, Kansas, Texas, Arkansas, Nevada and Maryland.

[ooh it feels so masturbatory following up one's OWN post! :-) :-)]
-- 
RON BUCKMIRE
The Anna Quindlen Fan Club
11 Colvin Circle, Troy, NY 12180-3735
uunet!rpi.edu!buckmr||buckmr@rpitsmts.bitnet||buckmr@rpi.edu||+1 518 276 8919
From: mls@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (mike.siemon)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: usenet.age
Summary: categories and computers
Date: 26 Sep 92 21:35:47 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Sep26.170850.23399@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>,
gsmith@lauren.uucp (Gene W. Smith) writes:

> In article <43216@ogicse.ogi.edu> markm@ogicse.ogi.edu (Mark Morrissey)
> writes:

> >What timing!  I was just leafing through a rather enjoyable (NOT!) book
> >titled "Categories, Types, and Structures.  An Introduction to Category
> >Theory for the Working Computer Scientist", by Andrea Asperti and
> >Giuseppe Longo.  MotssRelevence:  1/K, for some large value of K.

> Of course, the problem could be that Guiseppe doesn't know that
> 'category' already has an accepted definition.  Another depressing
> thought...

I had meant to include a comment about this in my earlier reply.  I don't
know about the contents of the Asperti/Longo tome, or any others in the
(fairly numerous) field, but in fact a category reworking of the limit
results of Strachey makes a lot of sense.  I'm not sure I'd trust a "com-
puter scientist" to handle it coherently, but categorical type theory is
something I long ago thought would be worth some exploration.

-- 
Michael L. Siemon		   "Oh, stand, stand at the window,
					As the tears scald and start;
mls@usl.com			   You shall love your crooked neighbor
standard disclaimer			With your crooked heart."
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: glp@fig.citib.com (Greg Parkinson)
Subject: Food Associations (was Re: Faggots)
Originator: glp@merlin
Organization: Citibank IBISM
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 15:09:45 GMT


In article <1992Oct1.000736.15479@cis.ohio-state.edu>, amz@iguana.cis.ohio-state.edu (Arnold M Zwicky) writes:

|> [item 3e...]

Arnold.  Please.  I love to eat, I love good food, I love
to prepare good food.  

I do not need an association forged between something I enjoy
and something that makes me queasy.

Perhaps descriptions of projectile vomiting or life-cycles of
parasites would be more in keeping?

Yours,

-- 
Greg Parkinson                  Phone: 212-657-7814  Fax: 212-825-8607
Citibank,111 Wall Street        E-Mail: glp@fig.citib.com
New York, New York  10043
The opinions expressed are my own and not those of the big 'ol bank.
From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Soc.motss in the USENET community
Date: 2 Oct 92 14:51:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: spdcc.1992Oct2.145100.20787
Organization: insert anything here

>nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:
>>The latest news.lists posting lists soc.motss to be about 39,000
>>readers. This is literally half of what was reported last month. I
>>asked about it, and what happened is he re-estimated the size of the
>>Usenet (something about NNTP servers inflating figures from what they
>>were 14 months ago). So most groups shrunk a bunch, including us.

	I went and looked at the news.list data.  Some possibly
interesting stats...

Here's the data for the motss-relevant groups
Rank Read Sample Prp Art Volume Xpost  Cost slice  group
 102 39000 1277  73% 2977 5196.5  11%  0.19  2.8%  soc.motss 
 400 20000  663  51%   50   83.8   4%  0.00  1.4%  alt.sex.motss 
 476 18000  589  57%  169  407.3  30%  0.03  1.3%  alt.politics.homosexuality 
 481 18000  586  59% 1352 2827.2   5%  0.18  1.3%  soc.bi 
1130  7200  237  22%  125  246.1  16%  0.01  0.5%  ba.motss 
1521  2200   73  12%   12   25.7  50%  0.00  0.2%  ne.motss 

	Clearly we need to pump up ne.motss :-) (it's 56th from the bottom!). 
Or does it make it the "bottom" ofr *.motss groups?  Hmmmmmm.
Judging from the enormous traffic on the pdx.motss mailing list,
even soon-to-be-on-the-block pnw.motss will surpass it... :-)

(So what's next?  oh.motss?  nj.motss?  tx.motss?  ca.motss? :-)

	The stats for soc.motss in comparison with the rest of the
newsgroups surveyed (1577 total):

	We are:

	102th in readership (94th percent tile)
	425th in propogation (73rd percent tile)
	564th in crossposting (65th percent tile) [where best is 0.0%]
	 20th in volume (99th percent tile)
	  8th in # of articles (99th percent tile)

	So in comparison, we generate a LOT of text in comparison.
If we cut out crossposting (gee, who could that be?), we'd probably
have one of the largest signal-to-noise groups as well...


	Looking at only the soc.* hierarchy.

	Soc.motss is:

	#1 in volume
	#1 in # of articles
	Tied for 1st (among 4) wrt propogation (this effectively
eliminates any possible bias against us at the news admin level).
	60%-tile for crossposting (so for the most part, soc.* groups
crosspost than we do).
	5th in readership

BBC
From: ro@panix.com (r l reid)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: CABAL stuff
Date: 5 Oct 92 16:47:42 GMT
Organization: MOTSS CABAL, NO MORE CHINESE FOOD DIVISION

In article <1ao36tINN14n@mizar.usc.edu> adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:
>In article <1992Oct4.183112.15428@reed.edu> 
>nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) has the nerve to
>flame me for skewering a Lacto-Ovo-Vegetarian:
>| In article <1amhhuINNkgl@mizar.usc.edu> 
>| adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:

And rightly so.  Where did you come up with the moral overlay on the
L-O-V (oh  dear - poor choice of acronym)?  Regarding meat -
some of us just don't like the fucking stuff.

What I even less like is that when I order non-meat dishes, someone
always wants you to explain your reason for not eating meat - even
if it's just at this meal.  (Of course, after that I can be quizzed
on why being mono-gendered isn't enough to "satisfy" me).

-- 
		r l reid	ro@panix.com
From: randyc@autodesk.com (Randy Clark)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Phyllis Schaffly's son John . . . COMES OUT NATIONALLY!
Date: 29 Sep 92 03:19:52 GMT
Organization: Autodesk, Inc., Sausalito, CA


In article <10#p73q.jfh@netcom.com> jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton) writes:
>In article <72836@apple.Apple.COM> mattm@Apple.COM (Matthew Melmon) writes:
>>
>>Is the rest of your body as flaccid as your mind?
>
>Is the correct answer
>
>   "Yes, the rest of his body is as flaccid as his mind."
>
>or 
>
>   "No, the rest of his body is not as flaccid as his mind."
>
>?

	Grin.  I'm tickled that you got to this before I did.
>
>Randy, which answer do you think is more flattering?

	I'm not sure.  Actually, I'm still trying to visualize
	an erect mind, so I haven't come fully to grips with
	the dilemma.

>And have you stopped beating your wife yet? 

	Certainly not!

	At least, if I had one, I certainly wouldn't --
	provided the favor were returned from time to time.

	Any old how, I'm sure that in this boy's presence
	I'd be as flaccid as anyone might desire.

	-R


--
Ignorant people think it's the *noise* which fighting cats make
that is so aggravating, but it ain't so; it's the sickening
grammar they use.  -- Mark Twain
Randy Clark			{}!autodesk.com!randyc
From: laga@wpi.WPI.EDU (Lesbian/Gay Alliance)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: HALLOWEEN DANCE (WORCESTER, MASS.)
Date: 5 Oct 1992 12:16:07 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu

	Hi all.  Our Bisexual, Lesbian and Gay Alliance is sponsoring a dance 
which will be held on Friday, October 30th from 8 pm until 1 am.  We are
really hoping for a good turnout (200 to 300 people), so we can show this
campus a thing or two.  The price for the dance is $4 without a student ID,
$3 with a student ID, and $1 off if you are wearing a costume.  Alcohol will
be available for those 21 or over.  We really need this to go off well, so
I hope to see all of you in the area attending.

	For further information email :   laga@wpi.wpi.edu

	or snailmail:  Worcester Polytechnic Institute
			BiLAGA, wpi box # 5965
			100 Institute Rd.
			Worcester, Ma.
					01609


We will gladly answer questions, send directions, or send whatever other
information you need.




					Hope to see ya there,

						Kevin C. Tefft
						(aka.   BITCH)
						WPI BiLAGA


  
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: rjwill6@PacBell.COM (Rod Williams)
Subject: Re: adoptions (was, usenet.age)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Francisco
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 15:45:33 GMT

> ry@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (ryerson.schwark) writes:
>> markm@ogicse.ogi.edu (Mark Morrissey) writes:

>>That does it!  Ry, would you be my other daddy?  Joel seems to be
>>a bit too lax.  My what can of worms have I opened here?
>
>Certainly.  Joel is an excellent daddy, but entirely too compassionate.
>Spare the Rod, spoil the child (besides disappointing Rod greatly).

I just *knew* that this "family values" bidnez, conceptual or
otherwise, would sooner or later suck *all* of us in, so to
speak...

Rod (greatly disappointed)
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
rod williams -=- pacific bell -=- san francisco -=- rjwill6@pacbell.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: stephena@netcom.com (Stephen Arrants)
Subject: Re: enough already.
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 20:12:47 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.185012.5917@macc.wisc.edu> anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:
>
>In article <1992Oct1.175117.13142@netcom.com>
>stephena@netcom.com (Stephen Arrants) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Oct1.144729.21445@macc.wisc.edu>
>>anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:
>
>>>Well whaddaya know!  I always thought penzance was
>>>what the priest wanted you to get down on your knees
>>>and do, if you'd been naughty.
>
>>No, Jess.  You're thinking of fellatio, which is seen as a
>>sin and not as the blessed sacrement that it is.
>
>For some reason, this wild talk about blessed sacrements
>and other new-fangled ideas puts me in mind of the 23rd
>Psalm, viz.,
>
>Thou makest me to lie down by still waters...

Prone or supine? 

>(I was always a pushover for that still waters stuff)
>
>Thy rod and thy staff, they comfort me...

Um....would this have anything to do with the "'Harder Sir!'/'Take it, Boy!'" 
discussion of a few months back?  

>(That guy *really* gets around, ya know, but well,
> like you said, blessed.)

OK, speak -- who is this guy you've been seen frolicking with?

>I just *love* inspirational texts, don't you?

Indeed!  and you an interpret them any way you want!  


Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: bcapps@agora.rain.com (Brent Capps)
Subject: Oregon poll
Organization: Open Communications Forum
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 14:42:31 GMT

Latest statewide poll of 600 Oregon voters on measure 9:
   62% NO
   33% yes
   5%  undecided

In Portland, no on 9 is running at 71% with 4% undecided.

It's not enough.  I want that 5%, and a piece of the 33% too.
I want bigots to think twice about trying this crap anyplace
else.  I want fundies to get the clear message that pulling
a stunt like this will only turn our movement into a political
juggernaut.

I want to *CRUSH* the OCA.  I WANT THEIR TOMBSTONE TO READ "MEASURE 9".

Then I want us to pass a statewide antidiscrimination law next year.
I'm too young for this shit.
-- 
Brent Capps           | 
bcapps@agora.rain.com | Know what to kiss, and when.
bcapps@atlastele.com  |
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: astrology and YOU
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst MA
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 21:42:36 GMT

In article <97555@bu.edu> kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star) writes:

>In article <15873@umd5.umd.edu> jns@elea.umd.edu (J. N. Shaumeyer) writes:
>
>>Brian Kane (kane@buast7.bu.edu) wrote of astrology:
>
>>> Well, it's not a true science if we constrain sciences to follow
>>> the scientific method.
>
>>One of the more stunning tautologies I've seen
>>in quite some time.
>
>Thanks!

I don't think that was exactly the correct response.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "You are just naive and repressed because
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /  penis envy is here and it's now and it's
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  all around you." -- Neal C. Wickham
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: How do you send e-mail to Compuserve mailboxes?
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 17:59:20 GMT


In article
<1992Sep26.163617.23620@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
lschmers@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Lawrence S Schmersal)
writes:

>I'm on Internet and I've got a friend on Compuserve and I wanted if anyone out 
>there knew what I had to place on front of the box number to send him some 
>mail.  There's no soc.motss relevance, I just thought some kind soul would 
>know.

If your friend's box number were 12345,67890 you'd send internet
mail to 12345.67890@compuserv.com

Simple, eh?  Works, too.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: balistik@big-brother.nevada.edu (Shawn Hicks)
Subject: Re: Ah, Fashion.
Organization: Not yet, but we're working on it...
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 18:02:42 GMT

In article <66976@cup.portal.com>, Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison) writes:
>richard@Apple.COM quotes:
>>(Herald Tribune, 17-September.  Used without permission.)
>>What's in Fashion?  For Men, Smooth Look Goes Integral
>
>[Obscenity deleted.]
>
>How utterly, repulsively grotesque.
>
>Of course, what else would one expect of fashion-obsessed
>morons?  Gaia knows, most of the "fashionable" clothing
>that comes out, no one with half a brain would be caught
>dead in.  The problem is that there are so very few
>people with at least half a brain....
> 
>() Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable
>() that we have to alter it every six months.
>()      -- Oscar Wilde

My last roomate is a bodybuilder, and quite hairy.  He tried
getting his back waxed, but the result was acne so bad that
it didn't clear up until his hair grew back.  I tried to 
explain to him that hairy backs are desireable, but to no
avail.  So, as his loyal, admiring roomate, I had no choice
but to shave that back on a regular basis.  Now tell me, 
why is it I love hairy men, but got such a rise out of 
shaving one down?

Shawn at gay adult video center: Hairless twinky movie #1, hairless
twinkie movie #2, hairless twinky movie #3, hairless twinkie movie
with token chest fuzz .... etc. 

If you want *my* chest shaved, you'll have to do it yourself.


Shawn, who seems to have conflicting fetishes.

 []Fashion is fine, but
   Tacky is timeless.[]

             ---Sayings of Kathy the Kinky Cod by
                Teece Jurgenson

Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance)
Subject: Re: birthdata
Keywords: Astrology
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 05:59:34 GMT

s0xjg@exnet.co.uk (Xavier Gallagher) writes:

>gender and you if you are homosexual, bisexual or what.

Is this a new slang for Lesbian? Cool! There should be more; I mean,
us guyqueers have tons of terms for ourselves, while lesbians have
only a couple (lesbian, dyke... and... um... aw hell...) (question:
are there any others that aren't intended to be offensive?). And
'what' is such a common word! Good idea to queer it.

John, thinking of the gradeschool wordplay joke:

-"You know what?"

	- "What?"

- "That's what."

[repeat ad infinitum]

--
John Dorrance * Alleged Homosexual/Shameless Hussy * thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu

			Dark. Handsome. 6 feet tall.
		  31 flavors? I believe he's got 'em all!
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: coren@osf.org (Robert Coren)
Subject: Re: Madonna bashing
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:23:45 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.201854.15093@spdcc.com>, dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) writes:
> In article <66742@cup.portal.com> Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison) writes:
> >Yes, but I was talking about Robert Coren (and John Gintell, of
> >course), not yourself.  ;-{)##]
> 
> Oh my, George.  I do believe you'd have had to take a number.

Why are people complaining about the "tone" of this group? I haven't
been flattered with such determination in quite some time.
Newsgroups: soc.motss