From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: do Overpeck's flamers have problems themselves? (was: Overpeck's problems)
Keywords: You expect me to mark my deletions?  Dream on...
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 20:51:49 GMT

In article <1992Oct4.142928.27369@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran) writes:
>In article <1992Oct3.061432.4873@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>>
>>As near as I can tell, this is the alleged "lie" that TSAKC is getting
>>so frothed-up about:
>>
>>
>>Subject: Re: Strange Bedfellows
>>Message-ID: <1992May28.184105.26227@odin.corp.sgi.com>
>>Date: 28 May 92 18:41:05 GMT
>>
>>>This is really unlike you-- you're usually more thoughtful than
>>>this.  I know that Keegan used the mailing list to try to get
>>>people to post in support of him.  Are you letting friendship
>>>take precedence over thoughtfulness?  I'm sorry, Keegan!   I
>>>like you, but I won't agree with you if I think you're wrong.
>
>Where is the lie in this statement?  

Good question. Where *IS* the (alleged) "lie" in this statement? Perhaps you 
should ask the accuser that question.

>And *WHO* are you quoting here?

Duh. Sometimes you're completely bereft of a clue, aren't you, Cochran?

Let's see, I don't suppose if you were following the thread, you might
have a noticed Keegan accusing CJ of lying about Suzanne Lucia, huh?

Or, failing that, I don't suppose you could have figured it out from the
Message-ID?? Nah...

>>Has lack of veracity _ever_ impeded their agenda?
>
>Ah, this must be the lie you're talking about.  While I'm not below flaming,

Don't flatter yourself, Keith -- you're not even *UP* to flaming yet.

>and I've even quoted Suxanne out of context once or twice, I've never posted
>somthing that I know to be a lie to the net.  

Either you're extremely ignorant, then, or you're just trying to cover up a 
whole bunch of lies with this one, because you've posted lots of untrue stuff 
to the Net; the lie about me threatening to sue Lefty, for instance. I've 
never done such a thing. Or all that crapola about me supposedly claiming 
that "Kevin Darcy" was a "GROUP" [sic]. I've never done that, either.

For someone who professes innocence so intensely, you sure as hell don't
seem to bother checking your facts before you spew all kinds of 
disinformation, Cochran. It's possible, I guess, that you really BELIEVE
all this shit you repeat, but don't you feel any duty to at least make a
_cursory_ check of an assertion's veracity before you state it? Or do you 
just unthinkingly accept everything that Keegan and Garvin spoon-feed you as 
the Holy Gospel Truth?

I think a rude awakening awaits you, Keith.

>And neither have the other members of TSAKC, as far as I know.

And my comments go double (triple, quadruple, googolplexth?) for that 
sentence, too.

>(BTW Kibbles:  All the members of TSAKC routinely meet in a small town in
>Kansas.  There, we take over a hotel, get rowdy for the weekend, and discuss
>how we're going to further our plans for world domination.  Would you care
>to buy a bridge to further the cause????)

Get a sense of humor sometime.

								- Kevin
Newsgroups: talk.abortion