HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bubai@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (P.Chatterjee)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: EDBERG: The artiste par excellence
Date: 21 Nov 1992 09:57:33 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

Hi Netters,

Agreed, Edberg has lost a few matches lately to players like Becker,
Sampras and Forget. I haven't had the chance to watch any of the matches
but I'm willing to accept the fact, judging by the scores, that he was 
soundly beaten. So?

It's interesting how some people, especially the Becker 'backers',
reeking of crass ignorance, pounce at the slightest opportunity to
passionately aggrandize the achievements of Becker and often doing so
by deprecating others. Oddly enough, this type of behavior is something
one can never associate with Becker---he's one of the most cerebral and
intellectually elevated people in the sporting world and is also one of 
the most gracious of losers (a wonderful trait in a sportsman).

Anyway, coming back to Edberg and his losses, it is a testament to the
respect that people have for him that they expect him to win everytime
he sets foot on a tennis court. Not that he has failed that test either.
He has never been the most dominant player on the circuit but has, by 
any yardstick, been wonderfully consistent over the past five or six 
years. Above all, very few people can dispute the fact that, like
McEnroe, when Edberg is on song there isn't a better sight on a tennis
court. Infact, as much of a McEnroe lover as I am, I find it much more 
of a pleasure watching Edberg perform. His first volley is perhaps the
best ever and his net coverage is exemplary. Further he, alongwith 
Stich and a few of the Aussies, would be the only players to prosper
if the racquet-head sizes were to be restricted --- this fact is
indubitable and Cliff Drysdale, Bud Collins and Fred Stolle will bear
me out on this.

I will be perfectly willing to entertain any CONSTRUCTIVE observations 
on the statement above.

So long, for now.

Sampras and 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Re: Info needed for tennis research paper
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:16:31 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.172615.7007@chpc.utexas.edu> eddie@chpc.utexas.edu (Eddie Hedges) writes:
>In article <1992Nov20.044010.7419@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>, c3b-as@po.berkeley.edu (Connie Chan) writes:
>> 
>> 	I need some help.  Right now I am writing a reserch paper and the
>> topic I choose is "What is the life for professional tennis players?".
>> 
>> 	The main theme of this paper is I am curious of whether the tennis
>> circuit is really as glamorous as it seems.  What attracts people to the tour
>> and what makes the players want to quit?

>  IMHO I think the ciruit is very glamorous for the top players. Check out
>the Sept. 1992 issue of Tennis magazine page 12. The picture says Andre
>Agassi and Steffi Graf were lookin' good as the guests of honor at the
>annual Wimbledon Champions Dinner. For those of you who won't be able to
>see the picture Steffi is looking BETTER than good! in her low cut evening
>gown and Andre has a black tux on. Some other thoughts that come to mind
>are Gabriella Sabatini as a fashion and perfume model and endless other
>situations.

While all of the above is true, if one wants to know the other side
of the coin, read the October issue of Tennis and learn about how
the teenage tennis stars are used and pressured. John Feinstein's
Hard Courts is an excellent source too. A #73 player might have to
practice just as hard as #3, but he/she is making a lot less money
and has to suffer the frustration of losing week after week. Read
about why Gretchen Megers has no better choice but to play professional
tennis to pay for their mortgage, interesting stories.
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     HR 1A-304, AT&T Bell Labs, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ, 07748 USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: ratte@sfb256.iam.uni-bonn.de (  Cordula Reineke  )
Subject: Frankfurt-results
Organization: Applied Math, University of Bonn, Germany
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 10:15:19 GMT

Hi, folx,

I saw the first 6 matches and will post some of the notes I wrote down
while watching. Sorry if I use some wrong words sometimes, you will hopefully
understand what I mean.

Here are the results, more details following in the next articles.

Tuesday:
^^^^^^^^
Edberg      -  Korda       6:3,       7:6 (11:9)
Sampras     -  Backer      7:6 (7:5), 7:6 (7:3)
Ivanisevic  -  Chang       7:6 (7:5), 6:2

Wednesday:
^^^^^^^^^^
Courier     -  Krajicek    6:7 (4:7), 7:6 (?), 7:5
Sampras     -  Edberg      6:3,       3:6,     7:5
Becker      -  Korda       6:4,       6:2


Cordula
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: gwendoly@fraser.sfu.ca (Gwendolyne Chua)
Subject: Re: Becker Fans
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 01:26:05 GMT

I don't want to start a war of flames here, so I hope this
will be taken as a matter of clarification (or to those who
really don't care, with a pinch of salt).  I hope not ALL we
Becker supporters get stereotyped as being snotty and gloating.
I think Boris is the greatest person ever lived (of course, 
this is my personal opinion), but like everyone else, he has
his days.  I support him, win or lose, and though I don't 
believe in putting him down when he loses, I don't believe
in gloating when he wins.  Hopefully, to the already
"not Becker fans", the gloating by certain ones don't put
you off too much.  Y'see, I think it's just hard for some
people to control their emotions, but I think I can safely
say, it is none of Becker's doing, personally.....=)

-- 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --  o -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
|Gwen Chua                               |     "Winning doesn't drag you    |
|Simon Fraser University, BC     /\O/    |      as high up as losing drags  |
|gwendoly@sfu.ca                0  \\    |      you down" -- Boris Becker   |
|gchua@unixg.ubc.ca                //    |          "BECKER RULES!"         |
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
From: pujara@tui.acs.csulb.edu (Dipen Pujara)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Edberg-Becker, Courier-Chang SPOILERS
Date: 21 Nov 92 00:43:27 GMT
Organization: Cal State Long Beach

In article <62228@mimsy.umd.edu>  writes:
> Courtesy of BBC World Service,
> 	Becker is now 20-10 head-to-head with Edberg,
> 
> >Dennis.

Does the 20-10 include exhibitions too? Last week Edberg beat Becker in an  
exhibition match.

Dipen
From: Gess Shankar <gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: ATP Update: November 20
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 17:21:47 EST
Organization: Knowledge Exchange, GA, US of A

$2.5 MILLION ATP CHAMPIONSHIP
AT FRANKFURT, GERMANY
FRIDAY'S RESULTS  
LAVER GROUP
-----------
Jim Courier (1) d. Michael Chang (5), 7-5,6-2
Goran Ivanisevic (4) vs. Richard Krajicek (8) (being played)

ROSEWALL GROUP
--------------
Boris Becker (7) d. Stefan Edberg (2), 6-4,6-0
 
So Boris makes the semifinal. Rather tame second set for Stefan. Any
German fans for some explanation?

Jim Courier will have to wait till the Ivanisevic/Krajicek match to
find out if he made the semis. If Krajicek beats Goran in straight
sets (How about 2 tie breaks, if both these guys serve well), he can
nose out Courier. But the way Goran has been playing, this seems doubtful.
So probably we are going to see Courier in the semis. The semi match-up
is likely to be: Pete Sampras Vs Jim Courier and Boris Becker vs Goran
Ivanisevic.

The Courier/Chang was on ESPN today in the US.

--
 GeSS                  |<><>|              /===/==//==/===/             |<><>|
|<><>|                 |<><>|             /---/--//--/---/              |<><>|
gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM |<><>|            /===/==//==/===/               |<><>|
From: Shawn.T.Burgess@dartmouth.edu (Shawn T. Burgess)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: expansion draft results
Date: 17 Nov 92 20:11:30 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a6@newshost.dartmouth.edu

I just got booted from the TV room, but I did get through the first 11
picks.  Here they are:
1.     Rockies - Dave Nied, Atlanta, P
2.     Marlins - Nigel Wilson, Toronto, OF
3.     Rockies - Charlie Hayes, Yankees, 3B
4.     Marlins - Jose Martinez, Mets, P
5.     Rockies - Darren Holmes, Brewers, P
6.     Marlins - Bret Barberie, Expos, IF
7.     Rockies - Jerald Clark, Padres, OF
8.     Marlins - Trevor Hoffmann, Reds, P
9.     Rockies - Kevin Reimer, Rangers, OF
10.    Marlins - Pat Rapp, Giants, P
11.    Rockies - Eric Young, Dodgers, IF

The ESPN analysts said that Reimer is almost a lock to be traded, and
maybe Jerald Clark as well.

***shawn.burgess@dartmouth.edu***
Texas Rangers in 93!
(or 94 or 95 or 96, etc.)
My opinions in no way represent the views of Dartmouth College.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: kstrohm@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Kyle W Strohm)
Subject: Re: Mitchell for Charlton and other trades.
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 01:22:08 GMT

As a loyal Reds fan, I feel I must say something here.  Even as big a risk it 
sounds, the Reds are wheeling and dealing again and doing it successfully.  
Last year they landed Swindell, Belcher, and Roberts and all three had pretty 
good years especially when compared to who they traded away for them.  And, 
this year they picked up Kelly for O'Neil which I have a hunch will work out in
the Reds favor.  O'Neil was a good player but he had his weaknesses and 
everybody knew about them.  Now they pick up Mitchell for Charlton.  BIG RISK!
But, you have to face up some facts.  I'm not sure how many home runs the Reds 
hit last year but they must have been close to the bottom of the league.  
Roberts, Larkin, Morris, and Sanders all hit for average for the most part.  It
was obvious that a power hitter was needed and considering what a tightwad that
Schott is, Mitchell is the best any Reds fan could come to expect.  As for 
Charlton, he will be missed.  Who's going to cover for Dibble when he gets 
suspended?  And, in case if my thoughts actually influence anything...sign 
Swindell or else.....
-- 
*************************************
* Kyle Strohm    *  hi mom!!        *
* kstrohm@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu *
*...........I GOT SKILLS!...........*
From: dittrich@sal-sun57.usc.edu (Matt Dittrich)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Maduux gone, Cubs alive?
Date: 23 Nov 1992 12:53:32 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: sal-sun57.usc.edu
Keywords: Cubs, Maddux

thf2@midway.uchicago.edu writes:

[...]
>
>I disagree with your [deleted] assessment that the bullpen is fine.  The
>bullpen lost 28 games and had a 3.82 ERA.
>

How much of that was in the last 4-6 weeks of the season, after Harkey went
down again?  They were doing great until then, but when everybody and his 
mother started going to the mound to start, things started going downhill.
The fifth "starter" would rarely get past the 5th inning, and the bullpen got
overworked.  I think if we can get 5-6 innings out of any starting pitcher
the Cubs might pick up (and if Harkey doesn't join the circus), the bullpen
will hold up just fine.
-- 
                                                               __
Matt Dittrich    | "Well the god I believe in        |        /  `
dittrich@usc.edu |      isn't short on cash, Mister" |   GO  |  UBS
                 |       -Bono on televangelists     |        \__,
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: thornley@milli.cs.umn.edu (David H. Thornley)
Subject: Re: David Segui
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 18:48:47 GMT

In article <Bxqq0v.63G@acsu.buffalo.edu> v130r92d@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Mark R Miller) writes:
>
>David Segui is a no-nonsense player. He has the heart of a tiger!
>Every team would be THAT much better with a player of David Segui's
>determination and will power.
>
>Too bad the Tigers have donut eating first baseman whose only mindset is to see
>what the featured flavor donut of the week is at Dunkin Donuts'.

But the Tigers have Dan Gladden!  What more do they need?  

David Thornley
"Please let them take David West in the first round"
From: RVESTERM@vma.cc.nd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Steve Howe
Date: 18 Nov 92 17:18:33 GMT

why should baseball care whether he's a drug addict or not? if convicted
of some crime, drug related or not, he should serve whatever sentence
the judge sees fit, and then become a free agent.

personally, i think all this whining about "oh, eighth chance" is lame.
who cares?

bob vesterman.
From: RVESTERM@vma.cc.nd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Milwaukee: One Gary Sheffield from a title
Date: 24 Nov 92 03:15:20 GMT
Distribution: na

sheffield's 1992 was way out of line with any of his prior seasons,
1990 included.  i would bet he'll return to form next year.

it's kind of tough to trade a guy who has awful stats for anything
good.  what were the brewers going to do, say to the padres, "well,
who knows? maybe he'll hit .330 next year with 33 dingers, even though
he's a career .259 hitter with 21 homers, total, in his life.  hey,
you know maybe he'll even have a .385 on base percentage, even though
he's got on base under 32% of the time so far.  so you should give us
fred mcgriff and your triple-a team for him."

this post kind of reminds me of one writer for the star ledger, a
northern new jersey paper, who, about halfway through the season,
started complaining that the entire yankee front office should be
lynched.  his reason was because "only a fool would let a .370 hitter
with 18 triples (or whatever deion sanders had at that point) go for
nothing!"

the writer apparently forgot what sanders was like while he was in
new york.  he showed no promise of doing anything remotely similar
to what he did this year.  it was a great move by the yankees to dump
him.  it didn't work out, but that doesn't lessen the intelligence
of the move.

20/20 hindsight is a great thing.

bob vesterman.
From: raj@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Bob Jewett)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:04:45 GMT
Subject: Re: Rockies First Player!!!
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball

In rec.sport.baseball, C Robert Claydon <cclaydon@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> writes:

> The Colorado Rockies Tuesday acquired pitcher Travis Buckley from the Montreal 
> Expos; the trade made Buckley officially the first player on the 40-player 
> roster of Colorado!!!
> 
> Wow, so I guess he gets the honors of first Rocky, eh?  (Or does one actually 
> have to end up on the final opening day roster?)

That "honor" should go to John Burke, a pitcher acquired in some sort 
of draft last spring.

Bob
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: b706zdj@utarlg.uta.edu (Jason Brown)
Subject: All Star Team Voting
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: The University of Texas at Arlington
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:35:00 GMT

With the expansion draft 3 hours away, and the winter meetings coming up, I'd
like to see who you think should be on the AL and NL All-Star Teams. Here's my
vote:
             AL             NL
1st-       Thomas         McGriff
2nd-       Alomar         DeShields
SS-        Fryman         Fernandez(? hummmm)
3rd-       Martinez       Pendelton(Sheffield's has 1 good year)
C-         Tettleton      Daulton
OF-        Sierra         Bonds
           Gonzalez       Grissom
           Griffey        Walker
SP-        Brown          Maddux/Glavine
RP-        Eck            Wetteland
Manager-   LaRussa        Alou
   Send your "votes" to either
       b706zdj@utarlg.uta.edu or
       cs1441fs@decster.uta.edu
  Results will be printed from time to time as votes come in
From: mlsa@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MICHAEL LAUREN SHERMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Trade Clemens?
Date: 21 Nov 92 16:50:18 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <By14H4.M9J@math.uwaterloo.ca>, fass@math.uwaterloo.ca (The FASS Thea
tre Company) writes:
>In article <1992Nov19.105843.10462@netcom.com> arrow@netcom.com (Les Arrow) wri
tes:
>>In article <wall-181192165750@elvis.swarthmore.edu> wall@cc.swarthmore.edu (Sw
arthmore College Computing Center) writes:
>
>[stuff about the ineptitude of Red Sox upper management deleted]
>
>>Ok, so what next? Trade Clemens?
>>--Les
>
>Is trading Clemens a bad idea?  Currently, Clemens is arguably the
>best pitcher in baseball and his market value would be incredibly high.
>From the performace of the Sox this year, and rumblings from various
>disgruntled Red Sox fans, I'm guessing they could use an infusion of youth.
>I'm not sure of the Rocket's age but he has been around for a while and
>will most likely decline in 3 or so years (then again he could be another
>Ryan).   The Sox need to rebuild and this would be a viable way to do
>it.
>
>Okay.  Now that I've caused all die hard Red Sox fans to put contracts
>out on my life for thinking such a thought, let's say you had to trade
>Roger.  What is the Rocket's market value?  What should the Sox get in
>return for the best pitcher in baseall?
>
>Lee.
>(Currently rooming with Salmon Rushdie to avoid angered Red Sox fans)
>
NEXT YOU WILL HAVE US DISMANTLE FENWAY TO SELL FOR SCRAP METAL, WE DON'T
COTTON TO YOUR KINDS ON THIS BOARD MISTER.  ROGER CLEMENS IS A NATIONAL ASSET,
HE SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE ON OTHER TEAMS.  BESIDES YOU OVER LOOK THE
LEADERSHIP HE PROVIDES TO A VERY CONFUSED TEAM.  THE ONLY TRADE I'D CONSIDER
WOULD BE WITH ATLANTA FOR THEIR WHOLE TEAM, TURNER'S T.V. STUFF, THE WCW, THE
VATICAN ART TREASURES AND TURNER'S AMERICA'S CUP BOAT, THEN I'D TRY TO RESIGN
HIM THE NEXT YEAR WHEN HE WAS A FREE AGENT.
  
-- 
MICHAEL LAUREN SHERMAN
758-0207
MLSA

"I really do appreciate the fact you're sitting here, you're voice sounds so
wonderful but your face don't look too clear so barmaid bring a pitcher,
another round of brew, why don't we get drunk and screw?"- J. Buffett
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: The first pick -- David Nied
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:10:49 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

nlu@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu) writes:
: In article <w!lq6yj@lynx.unm.edu> kbos@carina.unm.edu (Kurt "Some Guy" Bose) writes:
: >In article <jhopkins.177.722029634@cbacc.cba.uga.edu> jhopkins@cbacc.cba.uga.edu (John Hopkins) writes:
: >>
: >>It is 2:30 pm in the Eastern time zone, and the Colorado Rockies just
: >>took David Nied in the expansion draft from the Atlanta Braves.  What
: >>this means is this:  JOHN SCHUERHOLTZ IS TOO FUCKING STUPID TO
: >>LIVE!!!!
: >>
: >No, it means John Schuerholz is an astute gentleman who realizes that Ted 
: >Turner would have had his ass if Deion Sanders had not been protected.  Now,
: >you may redirect your diatribe at Turner, and I wouldn't mind a bit.  
: >Schuerholz wanted to protect Nied.
: 
: Sanders, perhaps.  But Otis Nixon?      

And Brian Hunter?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: arrow@netcom.com (Les Arrow)
Subject: Re: Sandberg #2, Grace #3 (was Re: Maduux gone, Cubs alive?)
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 01:22:20 GMT

In article <1erfrlINNf8o@sal-sun57.usc.edu> dittrich@sal-sun57.usc.edu (Matt Dittrich) writes:
>arrow@netcom.com (Les Arrow) writes:
>
>[...]
> >
> >I picture a lineup of:
> >
> >______
> >Grace 1B
> >Sandberg 2B
> >_______
> >_______
> >Sosa CF
> >Duunston SS
> >Sanchez 3B
> >Pitcher
>
>Curious that you should have Grace #2 and Sandberg #3.  I know that's what
>the computers probably tell you to do, but Grace seems to hit at least 20 
>points higher in the #3 spot, and I don't believe Sandberg is affected by 
>position in the order.  The only year Grace hit under .300 (I think) was in
>'91, when he was at #2 most of the year.  At the end they put him at #3 and
>we watched the BA climb.  Sandberg scores 100 runs no matter what position 
>he's in.
>
>I'd be interested in any evidence supporting or refuting this claim.
>-- 
>                                                               __

Grace is a fine contact hitter. Unfortunately, his middle name should
be singles. 

I see the job of a second hitter to get the runner on first over, be able 
to execute the hit and run, and set the table for the middle of your lineup.
Grace is a good man to do this. OBP is high, and can make contact.

Sandberg I think would also do a fine job in this role except somebody needs
to drive in the runs. I think this role suits him better.

--Les
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: s4lawren@student.business.uwo.ca (Stephen Lawrence)
Subject: JAYSWINWORLDSERIES JAYSWINWORLDSERIES JAYSWINWORLDSERIES JAYSWINWORL
Organization: University of Western Ontario
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:00:50 GMT

Sorry,...I just flashed back to a month ago, when the Jays beat the crap 
out of Atlanta.  My favourite part was when Hanoi Jane shook her fist in 
rage at the unfairness of it all and buried her head in Ted's shoulder!
        

s4lawren@student.business.uwo.ca (Stephen Lawrence)
Western Business School  --  London, Ontario
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: jsosa@encore.com (Joe Sosa)
Subject: Re: Marlins fans are merely jealous...
Reply-To: jsosa@encore.com (Joe Sosa)
Organization: Encore Computer Corp
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:38:11 GMT
News-Software: NN 6.4.16

You must be on drugs or something? David Nied, 45 saves? One too many lines.
To say that the Rockies got more minor league talent than did the Marlins is 
ridiculous.  All the Marlins did in the first two rounds of the draft is take 
minor league players.

Wake up and smell the Coors Beer!  Oh, you probably can't cause you drank it
all.

Marlins in 1995!

Joe Sosa

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ----- ----  /--- |  Joe Sosa -- jsosa@encore.com -- Encore Computer Corp.
    /   /---   \    |  Go Dolphins, AFC East, AFC, Super Bowl...the road to #1
----   ----  ---/   |  Go Gators, SEC Repeat!!  Beat them Semi-holes!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: spiegel@sgi417.msd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Mark Spiegel)
Subject: Re: Giants Sale Rejected 9-4
Organization: Personal Opinions Inc.
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 19:12:27 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.201543.465@sco.com> erics@sco.COM (eric smith) writes:
>
>jwc@netx.com (Jeffrey W. Comer) writes:
>
>>Back in
>>SF, there are the voters who at last count rejected a new stadium proposal 
>>four times, on environmental and financial grounds.
>
>Just to be picky, San Francisco voters turned down stadium proposals
>twice, Santa Clara once and San Jose once.
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

	Well to be REALLY PICKY the "Santa Clara vote" involved more
	than just the city of Santa Clara. It included San Jose, Sunnyvale,
	and several (but not all) other cities in Silicon Valley.


	Mark
From: Shawn.T.Burgess@dartmouth.edu (Shawn T. Burgess)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: draft update
Date: 17 Nov 92 21:54:53 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a6@newshost.dartmouth.edu


Well, I managed to get the TV back, so here's the rest of the first
round picks.
12.    Marlins - Greg Hibbard, White Sox, P
13.    Rockies - Jody Reed, Red Sox, IF
14.    Marlins - Chuck Carr, St. Louis, OF
15.    Rockies - Scott Aldred, Tigers, P
16.    Marlins - Darrell Whitmore, Indians, OF
17.    Rockies - Alex Cole, Pirates, OF
18.    Marlins - Eric Helfand, Oakland, C
19.    Rockies - Joe Girardi, Cubs, C
20.    Marlins - Bryan Harvey, Angels, P
21.    Rockies - Willie Blair, Astros, P
22.    Marlins - Jeff Conine, Royals, IF/OF
23.    Rockies - Jay Owens, Twins, C
24.    Marlins - Kip Yaughn, Orioles, P
25.    Rockies - Andy Ashby, Phillies, P
26.    Marlins - Jesus Tavarez, Mariners, OF

I'll try to post updates as I can get them.
***shawn.burgess@dartmouth.edu***
Texas Rangers in 93!
(or 94 or 95 or 96, etc.)
My opinions in no way represent the views of Dartmouth College.