From: s9874194@deimos.ucc.umass.edu (s9874194)
Subject: Re: Insensitive mainland chauvinist view. (Was: Who Cares 150 F-16s.)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 21:29:00 GMT

In article <YCHEN.92Sep13132119@sp1.csrd.uiuc.edu>, ychen@sp1.csrd.uiuc.edu (Yung-Chin Chen) writes...
>In article <13SEP199211051202@phobos.ucc.umass.edu> s9874194@phobos.ucc.umass.edu (s9874194) writes:
> 
>   In article <1992Sep11.133443.5656@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, ghe@nyx.cs.du.edu (George He) writes...
>   > 
>   >I want to add one point. This big China chauvinism pig 
>   >can not  tell the difference between defence and offence.
>   > 
>   >Weapons in Taiwaneses'  hands are for defence.
>   >Weapons in mainlanders' hands are for offence.
>   > 
>   >To sell weapons to Taiwan is to increase the stability of the Strait.
>   > 
>   >If mainlanders don't want to invade Taiwan, why should they worry 
>   >about this F-16 sale?
>   > 
>   >My dear fellow Taiwanese, prepare yourself  for the worst.
>   >I don't how many mainlanders share the same view as this blood thirsty
>   >chauvinism pig. As long as these pigs are there, we have to fight them
>   >whether we get united or independent, because the only thing these pigs
>   >want is to suck up our hard-earned prosperity.
>   > 
>   > 
> 
>>   I think that this netter never read the posts before s/he wrote the above
>>   garbage. Nobody has ever implied that he like to attack Taiwan and destroy
>>   the prosperity of Taiwan. 
> 
>What?! Are you new here? Have you read some posts about using nuclear
>weapon to destroy Taiwan if she declares independence or refuses to be
>unified? Have you read some posts claiming that everything in Taiwan
>belongs to Chinese in mainland?
> 
======================================================================
I have to say that I am relative new to the net (less than a month.) I
did not read what you suggested above. If so, I agree that it is
disguesting and behated. 
c.q.
======================================================================
>>   However, Taiwan independence is not acceptable to most of the Chinese
>>   people on both side of the Taiwan Straight. Even the Taipei government
>>   does not agree with Taiwan independence.
> 
>Goverment is goverment. People is people. Do you agree everything done
>by CCP, such as killing students? Now TI is not accepted by the KMT's
>goverment because of her political interests. TI is not accepted by
>the majority becasue of CCP's threat.  In the current situation, we do
>not see more benefits than disadvantages when both sides get unified.
>We may not prefer independence at this moment but we hate unification
>even more!
> 
=====================================================================
I agree that governments are not necessary the representation of 
people. I meant people, not government. I know some people from
Taiwan. The feeling I got was mixed. I hear pro-Ti ideas and I hear
pro-unification too. For most of the people from mainland, at 
least, the people I know, would not like to see Taiwan independent
from China. I guess you are pro-TI. I have no idea whether it 
represents the majority in Taiwan.
c.q.
================================================================ 
>>   The issue here is that Wshington is violating its agreement with Beijing,
>>   violating the sovereignty of PRC. 
> 
>USA also had an agreement to sell defensive weapons to Taiwan. F-16 is
>not a bomber, as B-2. It is not a long-ranged fighter. Thus, do not
>tell me that 150 F-16s can overturn PRC's goverment.
> 
=====================================================================
F-16 is not a bomber but it is an OFFENSIVE weapon if you know a little
bit more about it.
c.q.
=====================================================================
>>   I feel sorry that your mother
>>   did not wash your mouth before she give your birth. If all of the
>>   people from Taiwan are like you, life would be much easier.
> 
>To insult other's mother is unacceptable in any circumstance!
> 
Wait a minute! Is that an insult? Not to mention someone's mother?
Read that again!!
>>   c.q.
> 
>ychen
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china