HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: glen@slate.cs.wisc.edu (Glen Ecklund)
Subject: Missing syslimits.h from limits.h on SPARC (2.3.2).
Organization: U of Wisconsin Madison - Computer Sciences
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 22:24:42 GMT

I just found out that I have to install libg++ separately.  Shouldn't it be
part of the gcc/g++ distribution?
Anyway, when I did so, I found that 
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-sunos4.1.2/2.3.2/include/limits.h
was faulty, in that it contains:
    #include <syslimits.h>
and there is no such file on the Sparcstation (as far as I can find).
This was added as part of the installation process.
There is a /usr/include/sys/limits.h, and the original /usr/include/limits.h
is a link to it.
Curiously, there is no
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-sunos4.1.2/2.3.2/include/sys/limits.h

I created a dummy syslimits.h, and libg++ compiled.
-- 
Every child shall be treated with complete respect.

Glen Ecklund     glen@cs.wisc.edu   (608) 262-1318 Office, 262-1204 Dept. Sec'y
Department of Computer Sciences        1210 W. Dayton St., Room 3355
University of Wisconsin, Madison       Madison, Wis. 53706  U.S.A.

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
From: BJORKE@applelink.apple.COM (Bjorke, Kevin,APD)
Subject: GCC on SGI? NOT!
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 00:50:00 GMT

I have been unable to compile GCC 2.1 under SGI's IRIX version 4.
While "configure" is perfectly happy with being told simply:
 
    configure iris
 
the subsequent "make" fails, albeit after many successful object compiles,
on the file "mips-tfile.c" --- here's the log.
 
//////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
make LANGUAGES=c
        cc -Wf,-XNg1500 -c  -O1  -g     -I. -I. -I./config mips-tfile.c
accom: Error: /usr/include/errno.h, line 47: Qualifier mismatch in prototype,
pointer to const  char  versus   pointer to char
       extern void      perror(  char *);
       ---------------------------------^
accom: Error: /usr/include/errno.h, line 47: inconsistent prototypes for
function perror
       extern void      perror(  char *);
       ---------------------------------^
accom: Warning 100: mips-tfile.c, line 4979: statement not reached
         return 0;
       ----------^
*** Error code 1
 
Stop.
4.2u 3.3s 0:09 79%
 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
Any suggestions?
 
Making the "configure" call more explicit, ie
 
    configure mips-sgi-irix4
 
Fails even more rapidly, with bogus (for the MIPS C compiler) calls to
alloca().
 
I have repeated this failure on both my 4D35 (R3000 CPU) and a Crimson (R4000
CPU).
 
kb
 

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: jkim@modu.etri.re.kr (Kim Jin-Mee)
Subject: (none)
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 02:40:16 GMT

 01/09/93

GNU
Free Software Foundaion, Inc.
675 Mass Ave
Cambridge, MA 02139  U.S.A.

  bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu
  help-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu

Dear Manager

We have GNU GDB(gdb-4.7) and run on intel386 system.
I want to support development environment using GNU GDB for
the intel486 and the Intel Pentium for UNIX System V4.

If you have information about GDB for Intel486 and Pentium processor,
Please send me the following.

     o  Distribution plan for GDB for Intel486 processor.
     o  Distribution plan for GDB for Pentium processor.
     o  electronic mail or Fax number of Contributor. 

I would appreciate if you could send above information.
Thank you !

-----------
Jin-Mee Kim
Systems S/W  Section, ETRI
P.O. Box 8, Daedog-Danji
305-606, KOREA

E-mail: jkim@kiet.etri.re.kr
Fax: +82-42-861-1033

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: meissner@osf.ORG
Subject: gcc & X Windows?
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 17:00:28 GMT

| Are there some special commandline options I should use in order
| to make gcc compile X11R4/Motif1.1.? source?
| 
| I just compiled and install gcc 2.3.3 on my DECstation 5000 (Ultrix4.2)
| and I can't seem to make it compile X source.

While I no longer run Ultrix on my machine, I vaguely recall that this
is caused by an incorrect header file from DEC (after all 3.1, 4.0,
4.1, and 4.2 all have had different problems with header files).  In
particular, DEC put some prototypes that use types that haven't been
declared yet in the file.  I've heard people recomending either adding
-I/usr/include/mit to get the MIT versions of the header files, using
the -traditional switch to turn of ANSI C, or manually fixing the
include files.

| I get the following when trying to compile a simple logout button:
| 
| gcc -O -s -D_NO_PROTO xlogout.c -lXm -lXt -lX11 -lm -o xlogout
| In file included from /usr/include/X11/Intrinsic.h:44, from /usr/include/Xm/Xm.h
| :83, from xlogout.c:6:
| /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h:3958: parse error before `XSizeHints'

	...

--
Michael Meissner	email: meissner@osf.org		phone: 617-621-8861
Open Software Foundation, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142

You are in a twisty little passage of standards, all conflicting.
Xref: sparky gnu.gcc.help:2863 comp.windows.x:20794
From: mh@awds.imsd.contel.com (Mike Hoegeman)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Can't compile X11R5 with gcc 2.3.3 on SVR4
Date: 6 Jan 93 04:16:01 GMT
Organization: GTE Weather systems group, Westlake Village, CA

In article <1993Jan4.175438.16561@hal.nbg.sub.org> bodo@hal.nbg.sub.org (Bodo Bauer) writes:
>Hello to everyone out there!
>The subject says it all. I tried to build X11R5 Pl.21 / XFree86
>and got the following errors:
>make World BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS='-DSVR4 -DSYSV386' >& World.log &
>[...]
>        gcc -c -ansi -O2 -m486 -fpcc-struct-return -Di386   -I../../.  -DSVR4 -D
>SYSV386    -DUNIXCONN -DTCPCONN -DSERVER_LOCALCONN -DSVR4_ACP   -fPIC XConnIM.c
>XConnIM.c: In function `_XipConnectIM':
>XConnIM.c:101: `asm' needs too many reloads
>gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6

etc...

It looks to me like one of the network related header files being
inlcuded has an asm directive in it which gcc does not understand.  

My guess is it's some thing like an asm version of htonl. you can track
down which header file it is by looking for a there is a #define called
something like NO_ASM. If you put -DNO_ASM in your CFLAGS this will
cause the asm chunk of code not to be included and thus allow you to
compile.

--mike
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Hoegeman               email: mh@wx.gtegsc.com  tel: (818)706-4145
GTE Weather Systems Group   31717 La Tienda Dr, Westlake Village CA. 91359
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: a11@seis.gp.uwo.ca (Sonny Winardi)
Subject: help aout2exe
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 04:18:23 GMT


Dear GCC-Wizard,

I wanna have a run-time version of my C-program compiled using
GCC version for MSDOS. I have been able to run it using go32, but
aout2exe doesn't give run-able .exe file. aout2exe creates .exe
but that .exe file cannot be run.
For your information, I am using 80486DX-33MHz IBM Clone.
Please help me.

S.Winardhi
<a11@seis.gp.uwo.ca>

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: ryoung@utdallas.edu (Ryu Young)
Subject: MS-DOS make utility for DJGPP: where?
Organization: Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 19:56:19 GMT

I am looking for a MS-DOS version of make utility
that is compatible with Unix or GNU one as much as possible.

Any recommendation?

Thanks in advance.

Young

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: adams@pdv2.fmr.maschinenbau.th-darmstadt.de (Adams)
Subject: Re: gcc on Motorola Delta box ca. 1985
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 01:16:29 GMT
Organization: TH-Darmstadt

In article <C0CHrq.HMM@world.std.com> moshier@world.std.com (Stephen L Moshier) writes:


>     For several years I've been trying off and on to get gcc running on an
>   old Motorola Delta box.  The unix system identifies itself as System
>   V/68 M68020 R2V2.2, copyright 1985.

Furtheron I will assume MVME130/MVME131 - based...

>     By supplying a minimal config.h, I can get cccp to compile with some
>   complaints about enums.  The unix compiler supports structure
>   assignments, but apparently not reentrantly in subroutine returns. 
>   cccp crashes with a core dump almost immediately.

You will have problems with  your current C-compiler, it 
will not be able to evaluate branches around "LEGITMIZE_xxx_ADDRESS",
(if ..(if (if ()))). 
This is due to tables choosen too small during setup. There were fixes
available from Motorola.

Trick I used to bootstrap gcc on Motorola systems years ago was to
build a cross compiler on a system with approbriate endian ;->,
move all include files from Motorola to the cross development system,
making _SURE_, that these will be used,
and compile the sources to assembler sources, which were assembled
on the target system.

C-compilers delivered by Motorola (except Green Hills, which I never tested)
never were able to compile any GCC-sources (No, even not 1.3[7-9]).

You might have a llok at 
	"ftp.th-darmstadt.de:/pub/incoming/local_ports/sysV68".

hope it helps, adams

PS: mail referring to GNU-software should be sent to
	"gnu@pdv2.fmr.maschinenbau.th-darmstadt.de".




Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: crosbie@mercury.cs.clemson.edu (Scott Crosbie)
Subject: Trouble installing glibc1.05
Organization: Clemson University Computer Science Dept.
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 18:29:34 GMT

I am having trouble installing the glibc1.05 libraries.  The configuring
and compiling goes fine but during the make install there is a problem
with "zic."  I've heard the problem mentioned before but never saw any
solutions.  Could someone please post or send me a solution.

The error I am receiveing is as follows:

gcc -nostdlib -o zic ../start.o zic.o ../libc.a scheck.o ialloc.o emkdir.o -lgcc
 ../libc.a
zic -d zoneinfo -L leapseconds africa
zic: illegal option -- L
zic: usage is zic [ -s ] [ -v ] [ -l localtime ] [ -p posixrules ] [ -d director
y ]
        [ filename ... ]
make[1]: *** [zoneinfo/Egypt] Error 1
/usr/local/bin/make -C dirent subdir_install
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_install'.
/usr/local/bin/make -C grp subdir_install
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_install'.
/usr/local/bin/make -C pwd subdir_install
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_install'.
/usr/local/bin/make -C posix subdir_install
install libposix.a /usr/local/lib/libposix.a
/usr/local/bin/make -C io subdir_install
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_install'.
/usr/local/bin/make -C termios subdir_install
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_install'.
/usr/local/bin/make -C resource subdir_install
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_install'.
/usr/local/bin/make -C socket subdir_install
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_install'.
/usr/local/bin/make -C misc subdir_install
install libbsd-compat.a /usr/local/lib/libbsd-compat.a
/usr/local/bin/make -C gnulib subdir_install
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_install'.
/usr/local/bin/make -C inet subdir_install
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_install'.
make: *** [subdir_install] Error 1

Thanks in advance.

-Scott Crosbie

Scott Crosbie, Clemson University Math Science Dept.
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.windows.x
From: witr@rwwa.COM (Robert Withrow)
Subject: Re: Can't compile X11R5 with gcc 2.3.3 on SVR4
Reply-To: witr@rwwa.com
Organization: R.W. Withrow Associates
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 15:13:57 GMT

A good thing to do in this case is to do a cc -P on the file (or whatever
the GCC equivalent is to produce a preprocessed-but-not-compiled output), 
and then compile the result.  You can then track exactly what the problem is.

-- 
 Robert Withrow, Tel: +1 617 598 4480, Fax: +1 617 598 4430, Net: witr@rwwa.COM
 R.W. Withrow Associates, 21 Railroad Ave, Swampscott MA 01907-1821 USA
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: tiemann@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: exceptions (try/catch) in gcc
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 23:55:30 GMT

   To: help-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu
   Date: 6 Jan 93 02:19:48 GMT
   Organization: VERITAS Software
   From: joshua@veritas.com (Joshua Levy)
   Subject: exceptions (try/catch) in gcc
   
   I can not compile simple C++ programs which contain exceptions,
   such as described in appendix B of the Lippman book (2nd edition).
   I have tried with gcc 2.2.2 and 2.3.3 on a SunOS 4.1.2 machine.
   Try does not seem to be a key word, nor does throw.
   Should this work?  I thought gcc 2.x supported templates and
   exceptions...
   
   Joshua Levy  (joshua@veritas.com)

GNU C++ does support templates, but it does not (yet) support
ANSI-style exceptions.  Cygnus Support is targeting a June date for
the release of a version which supports exceptions.

It is a fair amount of work to implement this feature, and if you keep
up to date on the bug-fixing we've been doing at Cygnus, you know that
it's a fair amount of work just supporting GNU C++ users who report
bugs to the net.  I encourage people who wish to use GNU C++
commercially to contact Cygnus Support (info@cygnus.com) for
information about our commercial support services for GNU C++ and
other GNU software.  It is our customers who enable us to maintain GNU
C++ as a viable (and friendly) alternative to proprietary software.

Michael Tiemann
Cygnus Support
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.windows.x
From: dwex@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (david.e.wexelblat)
Subject: Re: Can't compile X11R5 with gcc 2.3.3 on SVR4
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 02:21:25 GMT

In article <1993Jan4.175438.16561@hal.nbg.sub.org> bodo@hal.nbg.sub.org (Bodo Bauer) writes:
> Hello to everyone out there!
> 
> The subject says it all. I tried to build X11R5 Pl.21 / XFree86
> and got the following errors:

Well, for one thing, XFree86 only handles X11R5 PL17.  If you went to PL21
before applying the patches, something is bound to be screwed up.  XFree86
1.2 will be out soon, and will support up to PL21.

> 
> make World BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS='-DSVR4 -DSYSV386' >& World.log &
> 
> [...]
> 
>         gcc -c -ansi -O2 -m486 -fpcc-struct-return -Di386   -I../../.  -DSVR4 -D
> SYSV386    -DUNIXCONN -DTCPCONN -DSERVER_LOCALCONN -DSVR4_ACP   -fPIC XConnIM.c
> XConnIM.c: In function `_XipConnectIM':
> XConnIM.c:101: `asm' needs too many reloads
> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6
> *** Error code 1 (bu21)
> 
> [...]
>         gcc -c -ansi -O2 -m486 -fpcc-struct-return -Di386 -I.  -I../include -I..
> /.././X11 -I../.././lib/Xau  -I../../.  -DSVR4 -DSYSV386  -DXDMCP -DSHAPE -DMULT
> IBUFFER -DMITMISC  -DMITSHM  -DXTESTEXT1   -DUNIXCONN -DTCPCONN -DSERVER_LOCALCO
> NN -DSVR4_ACP       xdmcp.c
> xdmcp.c: In function `XdmcpRegisterBroadcastAddress':
> xdmcp.c:173: `asm' needs too many reloads
> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6
> *** Error code 1 (bu21)
> 
> [...]
> 
> Any Idea? Gcc is version 2.3.3, compiled with target=i386-sysv4, I build
> the stage3 compliler wich was identical to stage2, should I try 'gas'
> instead of the supplied assembler? (BTW this is ATT SYSV386 Rel 4.0)

Well, I've built the server several times since upgrading to GCC 2.3.3,
and have not had this problem.  GAS has nothing to do with this; the
compiler itself is dying.  I'm really rather clueless about this.

> 
> 
> Any hint is welcome!
> 
> Ciao,
> 	BB
> 
> -- 
> -- Bodo Bauer * Nuernberger Str.81 * 8510 Fuerth * Germany *


--
David Wexelblat <dwex@mtgzfs3.att.com>  (908) 957-5871
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 200 Laurel Ave - 3F-428, Middletown, NJ  07748

"The meaning of life?  That's simple.  Try to be happy, try not to hurt
 other people, and hope to fall in love."  -- Mallory Keaton
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: spkay@fandago.read.tasc.com (Scott Kay)
Subject: (none)
Reply-To: Scott Kay<spkay@fandago.read.tasc.com>
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 18:21:21 GMT

   Has anyone tried using any version of g++ or above with ObjectStore
   from Object Design. If anyone has any information I would really 
   appreciate it. Object Design are claiming that g++ is too "different" 
   (no more info given!) for them to support gcc/g++. I don't know whether
   that means that g++ won't work with it, or that they just will not
   formally support Object Store development with g++. I was hoping 
   someone might tell me differently so I can continue to use g++ for 
   development involving ObjectStore, since I consider it to be the finest
   compiler/development environment available.

   Thanks in Advance -

    Scott Kay

*******************************************************************************
   Scott Kay
   The Analytical Sciences Corporation (TASC)
   55 Walkers Brook Drive
   Reading, MA
   INTERNET ADRESS:  spkay@fandago.read.tasc.com

*******************************************************************************

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: cross@eng.umd.edu (Chris P. Ross)
Subject: System name on Snakes
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 93 18:45:58 GMT
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity von Uniland, College Park
Originator: cross@quux.eng.umd.edu



	Hi.  I'm getting ready to install gcc 2.3.3 on an hp9000s700.
Does anyone have any info that I might wanna know?

	Specifically, I want to ask what the "suggested" system name
for such a machine is.  I gather that it's of the form hppa1.[01]-*-hpux*
where the last '*' is the version of hp/ux, and the [01] is someething to
do with the CPU.  But, I don't know what I should use there.  Anyone can
be of help?  Thanks...

                                - Chris
--
Chris P. Ross                         University Of Maryland
cross@eng.umd.edu                     Engineering Computer Facility
Work#: (301)/405-3689                 Project GLUE
From: br762@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Tim Werner)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: a little question about installing gcc-2.3.3
Date: 10 Jan 1993 01:55:17 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: br762@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Tim Werner)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Excuse me, I posted a different version of this in gnu.g++.help, but I
forgot to cross-post it to here, so I'm going to ask the question a little
differently. BTW, I'm sorry to keep yammering away about this, but actually
I, well, you know, uh, anyway...

Anybody who has built libg++-3 in a non-standard path, will you please
tell me what you did?

Specifically, I'm concerned about any links that you may have created by
hand to get things working, or any edits you did by hand to any of the
Makefiles.

Also, what was your ./configure command when you built gcc-2.3.3, what was
your ./configure command when you made libg++-2.3, and where were these
two directories relative to each other?

Thanks a lot if you can help.

tim werner
werner@sparcserver.mc.ab.com
--
Micro Credo:
        Never trust a computer bigger than you can lift.
--
From: lcw@ukc.ac.uk (L.C.Walton)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Help with libc.a
Date: 8 Jan 93 12:51:40 GMT
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.

I am having some problems installing the standard library (libc.a ver 1-05) on
my system. The setup is as follows:

		sparc (sun4) with sunos 4.1
		gcc 2.3.3 and gnu make.

The library is built with no major problems (except some warning messages).
The problems start when I go to install it using `make install'.

1	The zoneinfo files don't get built and zic crashes with s seg fault.
2	ranlib dose not get run on the library when it is moved (not really a prob)
3	When I then go to compile a simple test prog, eg gcc test.c

---------------------------- test.c ----------------------------------------------

		#include <stdio.h>
		main()
		{
			printf("Hello World\n");
		}	
	
	I get the following
		
		ld: Undefined symbol
		   start
		   .udiv
		ld: entry point not in test

---------------------------- test.c ----------------------------------------------

Any ideas what I did wrong.

		Thanks in advance.
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: willi@enel.ucalgary.ca (Ian Williamson)
Subject: NCR System VR4 on 386 binaries...
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 93 16:51:19 GMT
Organization: ECE Department, U. of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Hello.  I have been trying to compile a copy of gcc for our machine which 
is running NCR's AT&T Unix System V Release 4.0.  The problem is that we have 
no compiler on this machine.  

So, I'm trying to use djgcc on a 386 under DOS to create a compiler for the 
Unix box, and I'm not having much luck.  I tried doing all the config by hand,
and that seemed to work,  the makefile is being very difficult however, and 
the scripts of course don't work under DOS.  

Now, I'm not sure I'm doing it at all right.  Am I trying to create a compiler 
which will run under DOS and create the Unix executables, or am I trying to 
compile a Unix gcc directly using djgcc (I don't know if that is possible).
Is there an easy way to go about this?

I've run out of steam trying to do this, and would appreciate any help.  
Ideally, could someone help me get the binaries for the Unix box?  Then I 
could just recompile on the Unix...

Please reply via email to:  willi@geo.ucalgary.ca

Thanks for the help...

Ian

---
Ian Williamson
willi@geo.ucalgary.ca


Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: ycwoo@modu.etri.re.kr (Woo Young-Choon)
Subject: (none)
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 01:40:56 GMT

 01/09/93

GNU
Free Software Foundaion, Inc.
675 Mass Ave
Cambridge, MA 02139  U.S.A.

  bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu
  help-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu

Dear Manager

We have GNU C Compiler(gcc-2.3.3) and run on intel386 system.
I want to support development environment using GNU C Compiler for
the intel Pentium processor for UNIX System V4.

If you have information about GCC for Pentium processor,
Please send me the following.

     o  Distribution plan for GNU C Compiler for Pentium processor.
     o  electronic mail or Fax number of Contributor. 

I would appreciate if you could send above information.
Thank you !

-----------
Young-Choon  Woo
Systems S/W  Section, ETRI
P.O. Box 8, Daedog-Danji
305-606, KOREA

E-mail: ycwoo@kiet.etri.re.kr
Fax: +82-42-861-1033

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: moshier@world.std.com (Stephen L Moshier)
Subject: Re: gcc on Motorola Delta box ca. 1985
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 21:39:03 GMT

Motorola stopped supporting this particular box years ago; it's not
worth the $1200 they asked for an only slightly later unix version.

If it's true that the structure assignments are the problem, I will
attempt a cross-compilation on another machine.  If that doesn't
work, I'll throw the unix away and put OS-9 on it.  There is a gcc
port that should work.
From: bc770@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (George Burgyan)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Missing include file on SGI... Help!
Date: 5 Jan 1993 00:04:18 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bc770@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (George Burgyan)
NNTP-Posting-Host: thor.ins.cwru.edu


I was trying to get GCC-2.3.3 compiled on an SGI IRIS 4D-35, but one of the
system include files is missing: "cmplrs/stsupport.h".  The directory
"cmplrs" exists, but there are no files in it.  If anyone has this file, I
would _really_ appreciate a copy of it.  This is the only file that is
preventing me from getting this to work.

Thanks in advance.

GB!
-- 
   /~~~~     bc770@po.cwru.edu          "We demand rigidly defined areas of
  / ___  __   __   __   ___  __        doubt and uncertainty" - Douglas Adams
 /    / /__) /  ) /__) / _  /__)                  
/____/_(____(__/_/  \_/__/_(____ Burgyan    DOS, Windows Custom Software
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: willi@enel.ucalgary.ca (Ian Williamson)
Subject: i386 System V gas and gnu ld
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 93 23:17:15 GMT
Organization: ECE Department, U. of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Does anyone have these compiled?  I have gcc, but the person who gave me
it was using the NCR tools and I don't have them...I have tried cross-
compiling, but don't have the time to get that going...I already spent a 
significant amount of time with that...

Thanks,

Ian

---
Ian Williamson
willi@enel.ucalgary.ca

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help