From: franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Mommy! They Called Me Names! (Was: Implications of Abortion...)
Date: 12 Apr 92 19:00:57 GMT
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

In <1992Apr12.180154.7647@wam.umd.edu> judi@wam.umd.edu (Jay T Stein -- too baudy for my modem) writes:

>Where it was written: <1992Apr12.161143.27019@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
>Who wrote it:         kcochran@isis.cs.du.edu (Keith A. Cochran)

>>> = <1992Apr10.224333.2502@cs.dal.ca>, franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin)

>>So, are you AGREEING that pro-lifers who harass women attempting to enter
>>planned parenthood clinics should spend time in jail?  
   Every time a pro-lifer protests the present legistlation of the political
force, we understand that we are risking the possibility of arrest. However,
we usually try and work within the confines of the legal implications because
jail is most certainly a drag.
   This already happens - There have been quite a few men and women who have 
been placed in jail for obstruction, loitering, public nuisance, etc... Then
again, lots of people were arresed in the South during King's regime, and
Gandhi spent a fair bit of time in Jail. Hell, Jesus Christ died at the
hands of the law because of his beliefs (perhaps at the mercy of people like
you?) We understand the responsiblity every time we carry a picket sign,
but my friend - it is worth it.
   
>I asked a protester something like this once, and her reply was that it didn't
>bother her, because the law worked to her benefit since she is "pro-life..."
>*sigh* without a hint of irnoy, too.
   So? Judge a group by an individual? Heck - you guys had better feel the
same way - the law is working with pro-choice right now too... But,
things are changing already - maybe even before I graduate we'll see the change
I'm waiting for. 

>>>you are guilty as charged dear...
>>As are you, Honey.  Wanna be my cell-mate?  I promise I'll be gentle...
   Are you a freak or something?

>When a man loves a woman, he supports her right to choose.
   When a REAL man respects life, he supports the woman's unborn child.
   When a REAL man loves a woman, he supports her pregnancy so fully
that she would have no reason to have an abortion...
   When a REAL man loves a woman, he offers the life long commitment of
marriage to her. 

>     _____     __      __      Pro-woman,      /   -=* Jay T Stein *=-
>   |   |      |  \    /        Pro-family,    /
>   |   |  in  |   |  |         Pro-child,    <  Internet: judi@wam.umd.edu
>|__|   |      |__/    \__      PRO-CHOICE.    \    GEnie: J.STEIN18
>                                               \
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^ bahaha, that's a bit of
                                            convoluted logic isn't it?
Abortion has a wierd habit of disrupting the concept of family...
How can you condone abortion yet imply you are "pro-child"? Even if you
consider the fetus NOT to be a child, surely as a "pro-child" you'd like
to give each one a chance?

steve
-- 
aasdSteveFranklin-Subliminal Psychology Major.ks;dlasBlueJaysRULEkasdfeahsdbfl
sd;lfaswoq[eBuyMeAQuadra!!!mbnZMXCNdfsba;KdSPAMiuroqiyetIBMSuxiweuryth'ewr;mxn
qpuepriuPartyOneqtuj;,n.,xnc,kjasFlameMeNot!;lkj;lkgkjd;askElvisLivesjhfquweru
zx.cfranklin@ug.cs.dal.ca,sk;t;lrut[Superboy@ac.dal.cav.zx,Physics!eq3rwkh;oHA
Newsgroups: talk.abortion