HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: uucp@lerami.lerctr.org (UUCP Administrator)
Subject: lerami.lerctr.org uucp summary for the week ending Sun Nov 08, 92
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 08:31:35 GMT
Distribution: dfw
Reply-To: postmaster@lerami.lerctr.org
Organization: UUCP support, lerami.lerctr.org, Irving, TX 75060-7726
Followup-To: dfw.news


Remote   -----------K-Bytes----------- ----Hours---- --Avg CPS-- --Files--
 Host         Recv      Sent     Total   Recv   Sent  Recv  Sent Recv Sent
------   --------- --------- --------- ------ ------ ----- ----- ---- ----
rwsys      32240.7     367.6   32608.2    7.0    0.1  1275  1586 1688   84
dalsil       302.8   29155.0   29457.8    0.1    5.0  1374  1636   40  668
kf5iw      26555.8     360.7   26916.5    4.3    0.0  1719  2158 1210   80
whitwiz        0.0   12486.0   12486.0    0.0    4.4     0   788    0  333
taoami         0.5    8021.9    8022.4    0.0    2.1   483  1069    2  398
dbyrne         8.1    7884.5    7892.6    0.0    2.1   250  1048   16  456
cnbisis     1075.5    2588.6    3664.1    0.2    0.4  1891  1902   37  218
utacfd      2059.1     965.5    3024.6    1.4    0.1   415  1813 1481  208
ccrisis       26.2    2007.1    2033.3    0.0    0.3   351  1648   49   57
cmptrc       105.4    1886.1    1991.5    0.1    0.9   495   585  118  160
awful          0.0    1588.1    1588.1    0.0    0.2     0  1776    0  174
satisis      236.5    1105.2    1341.6    0.1    0.2  1188  1939   61   64
amix           0.3    1319.2    1319.5    0.0    0.2    78  2076    2 1254
kesher       785.7     337.3    1123.0    1.0    0.4   213   230   92   67
woodwrk        0.0     678.3     678.3    0.0    0.8     0   225    0  104
nnbsys         0.0     558.0     558.0    0.0    0.2     0   809    0   68
mic           10.9     369.8     380.7    0.0    0.1   371  1219   16   88
egsner         0.0     353.2     353.2    0.0    0.1     0  1198    0   74
niteowl        0.0     346.9     346.9    0.0    0.1     0  1290    0   78
letni        300.2      25.9     326.1    0.2    0.0   546   820  252   28
gcar         298.3       4.0     302.3    0.1    0.0   848   281    7    4
track29       47.7     222.2     270.0    0.0    0.1   363   788   24  168
u2u           23.4       4.5      27.9    0.0    0.0   581  1782   44   10
dlsisis        1.0      17.1      18.1    0.0    0.0    78   523    4   19
uniplex        0.0       9.1       9.1    0.0    0.0     0  2448    0    2
sulaco         2.3       2.8       5.1    0.0    0.0   321  2665    4    2
jmd386         1.6       1.8       3.3    0.0    0.0   151   285    2    2

                   -------------SUMMARY-------------
                   Total active uucp sites:     27
                   Total files recv:         5,149
                   Total files sent:         4,868
                   Total files:             10,017
                   Total hours recv:            14.4
                   Total hours sent:            17.8
                   Total hours:                 32.2
                   Total K-bytes recv:      64,082
                   Total K-bytes sent:      72,665
                   Total K-bytes:          136,747

Newsgroups: dfw.news.stats
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-ListName: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 92 09:29:48 MEZ
From: Rudolf Vetschera <WSVETSCH@NYX.UNI-KONSTANZ.DE>
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Subject: Re: Bibliographic App?
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc

> Has anyone used Word or WFW as a bibilographic tool?  I'm thinking about
> a keyword searchable writer's resource capable of a number of formats.
> I have NOTEBOOK II, but find it clumsy as a word processor and if I'm
> going to use word for entering the information why not just stay there
> and use the summary info?

I use EndNote Plus from Niles and Associates. It is rather flexible, allowing
for a variety of bibliographical styles etc. Integration with W4W is very well
done (using the Windows clipboard for transfer short references, EndNOte will
also directly process a W4W document to incorporate the full references,
formatted in any way you wish). Integration with Word for DOS is clumsy and
requires saving the document in RTF format.

Before that, I used to keep all my bibliographical data in Word documents and
search them with a program called Goofer (probably no longer available), but
EndNote has much better search capabilities.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-ListName: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 10:14:23 -0500
From: kellogg@neutron.chem.yale.edu (Gregory W. Kellogg)
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Subject: Re: Bibliographic App?
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc

In article <04NOV92.10424309.0008.MUSIC@NMUMUS> you wrote:
: Has anyone used Word or WFW as a bibilographic tool?  I'm thinking about
: a keyword searchable writer's resource capable of a number of formats.
: I have NOTEBOOK II, but find it clumsy as a word processor and if I'm
: going to use word for entering the information why not just stay there
: and use the summary info?

Only via Endnote, which is not a perfect program (its keybindings
leave something to be desired) but it's *much* better than Notebook II, and
if you run Windows in enhanced mode you can cut and paste between
Endnote and WFW, both citations for later processing and full in-line
citations.

Availible via Niles & Associates,  Berkeley, CA (to whom I have no
connection other than as a customer)
--
============================================================================|
| Gregory Kellogg                           kellogg@neutron.chem.yale.edu   |
| Department of Molecular         	    203-432-5208 Fax: 203-432-6144  |
|      Biophysics and Biochemistry                                          |
| Yale University      	       	       	       	       	       	       	    |
| New Haven, CT 06511							    |
|===========================================================================|
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-ListName: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 12:53:54 -0600
From: payne@cwis.unomaha.edu (Matt G. Payne)
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Subject: Re: Bibliographic App?
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc

In bit.mailserv.word-pc you write:

>In a posting Michael Gordon writes :
>>
>> >Has anyone used Word or WFW as a bibilographic tool?  I'm thinking about
>> >a keyword searchable writer's resource capable of a number of formats.
>> >I have NOTEBOOK II, but find it clumsy as a word processor and if I'm
>> >going to use word for entering the information why not just stay there
>> >and use the summary info?
>>
>> I'd be interested in the responses to this, as I too am looking for something
>> similar (and have given up on NOTEBOOK II).
>>
>> Michael D. Gordon
>> gordonM@cc.denison.edu
>> Date sent:  5-NOV-1992 08:14:15
>>
>>
>>
>We have never used W4W to do such thing but we are using a rather
>powerfull DOS app called 'Reference Manager'. It still is a full
>dos app but runs flawlessly under win. It has capabilities of
>generating references lists that are fully W4W compatible & it
>can recognise a number of commercially available text processing
>file formats. So I wonder why one whould like to make things too
>complicated except for the fun of doing it of course :-)

Where can 'Reference Manager' be found?

Thanks! -- matt payne@UNOmaha.edu

>--
>====================================================================
>Willy Verheulpen                            Systems Coordination
>                   Institute for Molecular Biology
>Brussels Free University                                 Belgium
>I-------------------------------------I----------------------------I
>I Bitnet :   waverheu@bbrbfu60.bitnet I Things tend to get worse   I
>I Intern :   waverheu@vub.ac.be       I under pressure (Murphy)    I
>I_____________________________________I____________________________I
>Usual Disclaimer: No connection with any commercial product.
>====================================================================
From: FABH%NMUMUS.BITNET@ibm.gwdg.de (FABH000)
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc
Subject: Bibliographic App?
Date: 4 Nov 92 14:39:07 GMT
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-ListName: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>

Has anyone used Word or WFW as a bibilographic tool?  I'm thinking about
a keyword searchable writer's resource capable of a number of formats.
I have NOTEBOOK II, but find it clumsy as a word processor and if I'm
going to use word for entering the information why not just stay there
and use the summary info?
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc
From: U6IC <U6IC@UNB.CA>
Subject: Re: File 'eating' system resources
Organization: The University of New Brunswick
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 06:22:54 GMT

    JUST THOUGHT I WOULD GIVE A FINAL WORD ON THIS FOR ALL INTERESTED

  Mr. Brancati's correctly identified the source of the problem as being
  due to the postcript driver shipped with win3.x, as the document in
  question did have a combination of lanscape and portrait orientations.


>postscript drivers cause this to happen if you switch between
>landscape and portrait page orientation in one document.  If this is
>your problem, you need to get the latest windows postscript driver.
>It can be downloaded from MS's BBS (I've never used it, but I think
>the number is (206)936-6735) or gotten by anonymous ftp from
>ftp.cica.indiana.edu.
>

  The updated driver can be obtained throught anonymous ftp from
  ftp.cica.indiana.edu (129.79.20.84) in directory
      pub/pc/win3/drivers/printer (pscrip.exe dd. 92-07-23)

Hayden

        _____
      /   |   \    'With sticks in hand, I don't beat, instead, I play'
    /\___/ \___/\
   |   |  o  |   |               | De Man Wid De Pan
  | \__| o o |----|    0-----    | -----------------------
   |/   \ o / \  |   0           | Hayden Nanton
    \ __/ |    \/    |           | E-Mail:- U6IC@UNB.CA
      \ __|__ /      |
.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-ListName: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 13:44:30 -0400
From: root@px1.stfx.ca (System PRIVILEGED Account)
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc

From rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de Thu Nov  5 10:46:40 1992
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-Listname: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>
Received: from max.cc.denison.edu by UFOBI1.UNI-FORST.GWDG.DE (MX V3.1C) with
          SMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 1992 14:12:03 MEZ
Received: from CC.DENISON.EDU by CC.DENISON.EDU (PMDF #12482) id
          <01GQSAOFPLIO000JSP@CC.DENISON.EDU>; Thu, 5 Nov 1992 08:14 EST
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 08:14 EST
From: Michael Gordon <GORDONM@CC.DENISON.EDU>
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Subject: Re: Bibliographic App?
To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Message-Id: <01GQSAOFPLIO000JSP@CC.DENISON.EDU>
X-Vms-To: IN%"WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de"

>Has anyone used Word or WFW as a bibilographic tool?  I'm thinking about
>a keyword searchable writer's resource capable of a number of formats.
>I have NOTEBOOK II, but find it clumsy as a word processor and if I'm
>going to use word for entering the information why not just stay there
>and use the summary info?

I'd be interested in the responses to this, as I too am looking for something
similar (and have given up on NOTEBOOK II).

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  5-NOV-1992 08:14:15

Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-ListName: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>
From: waverheu%vub.ac.be@ibm.gwdg.de (Verheulpen W.)
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Subject: Re: Bibliographic App?
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 16:16:44 MET
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]

In a posting Michael Gordon writes :
>
> >Has anyone used Word or WFW as a bibilographic tool?  I'm thinking about
> >a keyword searchable writer's resource capable of a number of formats.
> >I have NOTEBOOK II, but find it clumsy as a word processor and if I'm
> >going to use word for entering the information why not just stay there
> >and use the summary info?
>
> I'd be interested in the responses to this, as I too am looking for something
> similar (and have given up on NOTEBOOK II).
>
> Michael D. Gordon
> gordonM@cc.denison.edu
> Date sent:  5-NOV-1992 08:14:15
>
>
>
We have never used W4W to do such thing but we are using a rather
powerfull DOS app called 'Reference Manager'. It still is a full
dos app but runs flawlessly under win. It has capabilities of
generating references lists that are fully W4W compatible & it
can recognise a number of commercially available text processing
file formats. So I wonder why one whould like to make things too
complicated except for the fun of doing it of course :-)

--
====================================================================
Willy Verheulpen                            Systems Coordination
                   Institute for Molecular Biology
Brussels Free University                                 Belgium
I-------------------------------------I----------------------------I
I Bitnet :   waverheu@bbrbfu60.bitnet I Things tend to get worse   I
I Intern :   waverheu@vub.ac.be       I under pressure (Murphy)    I
I_____________________________________I____________________________I
Usual Disclaimer: No connection with any commercial product.
====================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-ListName: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 12:01 EST
From: Michael Gordon <GORDONM@CC.DENISON.EDU>
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Subject: Re: Word for Windows 2.0b
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc
X-VMS-To: IN%"WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de"

>
>Recently, there have been several references to Word for Windows
>version 2.0b.  What is the Microsoft number to get this upgrade?
>

The usual one: 800-426-9400, select #4 from the menu.

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  6-NOV-1992 12:01:11
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-ListName: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 08:25 CST
From: ABRAHAM SALAM <ASALAM%MTSU.BITNET@ibm.gwdg.de>
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Subject: Re: Bibliographic App
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc
X-Envelope-to: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-VMS-To: IN%"WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de"

signoff word-pc
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-ListName: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 08:14 EST
From: Michael Gordon <GORDONM@CC.DENISON.EDU>
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Subject: Re: Bibliographic App?
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc
X-VMS-To: IN%"WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de"

>Has anyone used Word or WFW as a bibilographic tool?  I'm thinking about
>a keyword searchable writer's resource capable of a number of formats.
>I have NOTEBOOK II, but find it clumsy as a word processor and if I'm
>going to use word for entering the information why not just stay there
>and use the summary info?

I'd be interested in the responses to this, as I too am looking for something
similar (and have given up on NOTEBOOK II).

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  5-NOV-1992 08:14:15
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Errors-To: rmeyer@ufobi2.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X-ListName: WORD-PC unmoderated list <WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de>
X400-Received: by mta ixgate.gmd.de in /PRMD=GmD/ADMD=DbP/C=DE/; Relayed; Wed,
    11 Nov 1992 08:20:43 +0100
X400-Received: by /PRMD=ac/ADMD=mail/C=si/; Relayed; Wed, 11 Nov 1992 08:21:42
    +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 08:21:42 +0100
X400-Originator: ziga.turk@uni-lj.ac.mail.yu
X400-Recipients: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=ac/ADMD=mail/C=si/;921111082142]
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2)
Content-Identifier: 194
Conversion: Prohibited
From: Ziga Turk <ziga.turk@uni-lj.ac.mail.yu>
Reply-To: WORD-PC@ufobi1.uni-forst.gwdg.de
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc
Subject: signoff

signoff word-pc
From: isdhm@acad2.alaska.edu
Newsgroups: bit.mailserv.word-pc
Subject: * TrueType Fonts *
Date: 5 Nov 92 02:58:56 GMT
Organization: University of Alaska



                            TRUE Type Source



                           Truetype Fonts for
                          Microsoft Windows v3.1



                    Over 170 Quality Fonts  --  $45.00



                    For a Catalog Please Call or Email Us
                       Your Complete Mailing Address:
         
                         Email: ISDHM@acad2.alaska.edu
                         Phone: (907) 235 - 6170
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.info-gcg
Date:         Tue, 10 Nov 1992 22:34:33 EST
Reply-To:     westerm@aclcb.purdue.edu
              <INFO-GCG@UTORONTO.BITNET>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was westerm@ACLCB.PURDUE.EDU
From:         Rick Westerman <westerm@BCHM1.ACLCB.PURDUE.EDU>
Subject:      GCG and DEC's AXP (Alpha) systems

In the Alpha press releases today [Nov-10], I noticed that one of the
ported programs is "the Wisconsin package". Now that everyone can
finally talk offically about Alpha, are there any comments from the GCG
people; e.g., does GCG run under OSF and/or OpenVMS? How much faster
are the Alpha systems for real-life applications? Inquiring minds want
to know!


-- Rick

Rick Westerman                System Manager of the AIDS Center Laboratory
westerm@aclcb.purdue.edu      for Computational Biochemistry (ACLCB), BCHM
Phone: (317) 494-0505         bldg., Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907
  FAX: (317) 494-7897
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: INN, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.info-gcg
Date:         Sun, 8 Nov 1992 12:50:08 +0200
Reply-To:     Jaime Prilusky <LSPRILUS@WEIZMANN.WEIZMANN.AC.IL>
              <INFO-GCG@UTORONTO.BITNET>
From:         Jaime Prilusky <LSPRILUS@WEIZMANN.WEIZMANN.AC.IL>
Subject:      INN new address
Comments: To: info-gcg@utoronto.BITNET, bionet-news@daresbury.ac.uk

As from today, Sunday November 8th, 1992, both the INN anonymous FTP server
and the INN BioGopher have a new internet address: 132.76.55.12

If you used to connect to our computer by its name (sunbcd.weizmann.ac.il),
then you do not need to worry about this change. The intermediate computers
will manage to provide you with the correct connection.

If you have any problem, please contact me.

 Dr Jaime Prilusky
 Israel National Node   INN          ! LSPRILUS@WEIZMANN.WEIZMANN.AC.IL
 Weizmann Institute of Science       ! fax: 972-8-344113
 76100 Rehovot - Israel              ! tel: 972-8-342470 / 2979
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
From: INNA@HUJIVMS.BITNET (Inna Perlov)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.info-gcg
Subject: end-labeled fragments
Date: 12 Nov 92 15:16:00 GMT
              <INFO-GCG@UTORONTO.BITNET>
Reply-To: Inna Perlov <INNA@HUJIVMS.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU


 One of my users has the following problem, which can't be solved by GCG
programs. Maybe you have any ideas, or can point on any other program to
use?

<I'm trying to use the program "fingerprint" but I have a problem. This program
<cuts RNA after every "G" residue , and what we need is a partial
<digestion of the RNA. We use RNA radioactivly labled at the 5' end, then we use
<T1 nuclase at sub-optimal condition, run the reaction on a gel and expose it.
<Because the RNA is labled only at its 5' end, the only bands we see on the gel
<will be fragments of RNA that contain the labled 5' end. For exaple if there
<are"G" residues at positions 10, 25, 65, the only bands we will see will be
<10,25, 65 nucleotides long, but not the 15 or 40 nucleotides long fragments
<between the10-25 or 25-65. The program "fingerprint" gives total digestion of
<the RNA with no relation to the labeling or condition of the reaction.

	Thank you in advance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Inna Perlov 			   Phone      972-2-584848
 Hebrew University 		   E-Mail    Inna@hujivms.bitnet
 Computation center			     Inna@vms.huji.ac.il
 Givat-Ram 91904 Jerusalem	   FAX	      972-2-527349
 Israel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.info-gcg
From: agoodrid@vaxa.weeg.uiowa.edu (Stephen Klautky)
Subject: Findpattern
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 05:08:00 GMT

Hello,

I am using GCG 7.1 on a VAX.  I would like to do searches
with certain combinations of patterns but I am not sure
how to set it up.

For example I want to search a sequence with the following
pattern:  Motif1(N){0,6}Motif2

Motifs 1 and 2 are a set of short sequences; right now there
are 20, each 6 bp.  I want to search *all* combinations of
this list of motifs.

To bring biology into this - Motifs 1 and 2 are half-site
binding sequences for transcription factors.

In the past I simply used FIND to locate all half sites for a
given sequence then by hand waded through the spacing requirements.
This is usually not a problem.  But when you add mismatches then
things get really messy because if a motif is 5-6 bp you get a long
list.  Whereas with 2 or 3 mismatches using Motif1(N){0,6}Motif2
that problem is minimized.

Any hints or comments are appreciated.

-=] Stephen Klautky [=-    AGOODRID@VAXA.WEEG.UIOWA.EDU
Biochemistry Dept., University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. 52242