From: jonl@tic.com (Jon Lebkowsky)
Subject: Chapter Discussions
Originator: riddle@aahsa.tic.com
X-Submissions: eff-austin@tic.com
Organization: none
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:34:22 GMT

We're going to work a little harder at keeping the membership up-
to-date on the EFF Chapters Conference developments. I want to 
begin by offering this brief overview of what's happened so far.
 
As you all know, EFF-Austin is the only official local chapter of 
the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Steve Jackson and others in 
Austin had suggested that the organization begin grassroots 
development with local chapters, so the Austin group was formed 
as an "alpha" or model chapter, so defined by Mitch Kapor, then 
Executive Director of EFF. As a local computer networking group, 
even as a community-building effort, EFF-Austin has been quite 
successful. As a chapter of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 
however, we have been hampered by the national organization's 
inconsistent perspective on chapters and by overall poor 
communications. It is important to remember here that the 
national organization is young and still disorganized, and it has 
until recently pivoted on the efforts and inclinations of one of 
its founders, or so it seems from the outside...there has been 
something of a veil over the internal operations of EFF-National. 
For some of us the assumption has been that the organization was 
run more like a private corporation than a public, nonprofit 
civil liberties organization.
 
Whatever the case, EFF-National seems to have seen the need to 
open up, change the distribution of authority and information, 
and begin a structured approach to the development of local 
chapters. To that end, Cliff Figallo was hired as director of the 
Cambridge office. Cliff visited Austin in September, soon after 
he began work, and we had hopeful discussions about EFF-Austin's 
part in a confederation of local chapters. Cliff had been talking 
to two nascent chapters, one in the San Francisco Bay Area 
(this!group) and one in New York (NTE). We suggested to him that 
a confederation meeting, with representatives from the various 
organizations with potential for affiliation, would be a good 
idea. At this meeting we could bring the diverse networking 
groups together to evolve a strategy and a structure for chapters 
development.
 
Cliff carried this idea to a board meeting of EFF-National which 
was held in the San Francisco Bay Area. Mitch Ratcliffe of 
this!group was present at that meeting. The national board of 
directors decided to support the meeting concept. The meeting 
would be held in Atlanta, a "neutral" site physically located 
between the two coasts. Mitch Ratcliffe would represent chapters-
in-formation on the steering committee for the conference, which 
would also include EFF-National officers and directors.
 
When the EFF-Austin directors received word of this, we were 
surprised and disappointed that our input had not been solicited 
before plans were firm. We were also concerned that Austin had no 
representation on the steering committee for the meeting. We did 
not understand why a member of an unaffiliated group that had 
been somewhat negative about affiliation was appointed to the 
steering committee, but EFF-Austin, the only existing affiliated 
chapter, was not involved.
 
We therefore offered Austin as an alternative site for the 
meeting, with the idea that our organization could host such a 
meeting better than a presumably disinterested party (Georgia 
Tech). Around this time John Quarterman implemented an electronic 
mailing list to facilitate ongoing discussion among local group 
organizers and individuals who were interested in goals and 
activities similar to those of EFF.
 
The list immediately became quite active with discussion of the 
meeting, and of our proposal that the venue be changed to Austin. 
Though the change of venue never received official response from 
EFF-National, Mitch Ratcliffe essentially flamed the proposal, 
implying that EFF-Austin was trying to gain some kind of 
advantage in negotiations.
 
We dropped the suggestion of a venue change. We tentatively 
accepted the invitation to attend the meeting, and I was proposed 
as an addition to the steering committee. The steering committee 
accepted, and I have been working with them since.
 
Since then, we have been discussing the agenda for the meeting, 
the latest version of which I will post separately. We have also 
seen controversy over EFF's financial involvement in development 
of a product for linking to the Internet, which they plan to 
distribute for free. The basis for controversy: 1) the product 
will favor one commercial Internet conncectivity provider over 
others 2) it will compete, perhaps unfairly, with commercial 
products that have similar functionality 3) specifics relating to its 
development were not shared with members of the organization 
4) software development may be inconsistent with EFF's mission. 
Jerry Berman, Acting Executive Director of EFF-National, has 
promised to take up this matter at an EFF board retreat in early 
January.
 
In working with the steering committee, and through private 
communications I have received related to that task, I have come 
to believe that there is sincere effort on the part of EFF to 
develop a more open organizational structure incorporating local 
chapters, and that the principals involved in these discussions 
are sensitive to the need to preserve as much as possible the 
autonomy and identity of each group.
 
Here are some problems that I see that are specific to our group:
 
1)      EFF-National doesn't really know us. Most of our 
communication in the past was with Mitch Kapor, and that was 
limited.
 
2)      EFF-National perceives us as "mavericks," which of course 
could be a good thing or a bad thing, I'm not sure which. I 
think the real concern is that EFF-Austin evolved pretty 
much on its own, has an established structure and identity, 
and may resist an attempt on the national organization's 
part to create a different set of rules for chapters.
 
3)      EFF-National has nothing to offer EFF-Austin. We are an 
established, incorporated entity. We have access to the 
Internet. We don't need money or guidance from EFF-National, 
therefore they're probably wondering whether we're a chapter 
or a "competitor." And that is a good question: why would we 
affiliate? We would have to be strongly supportive of what 
EFF-National is doing. This is something we might want to 
discuss in a general meeting.
 
4)      EFF-National has not been good at communicating with its 
members. How many of you feel that you know what EFF-
National is doing? If don't know what EFF-National is about, 
how can you agree or disagree?
 
5)      EFF-National's officers and directors don't really seem to 
be at home in cyberspace, at least not all of them. E.g. 
there seems to be a resistance to ASCII, mailing lists, and 
newsgroups as tools for communication and problem 
resolution. A lack of subtext may be the barrier they 
perceive.
 
6)      Goals not synchronized: major players at EFF-National seem 
to have extremely different goals for the organization. Is 
it a civil liberties group? A forum for debate (and flame)? 
A support group for consciousness enhancement? A quasi-
public corporation? To me, the overriding goal should be 
community development on this new frontier in cyberspace. I 
think Cliff Figallo is the one person at EFF-National who's 
focused on this concept.
 
On December 20, EFF-Austin's directors participated in a telephone 
conference call with Jerry Berman and Shari Steele (a staff attorney 
at EFF's Washington, D.C. office). The discussion was encouraging. 
We had the sense that some of the difficulties in our relations and 
communications with EFF-National could be attributed to the falterings 
of a young organization which is still working to establish a clear sense 
of mission, a clear set of goals. The chapters conference in January 
should give us a much better sense of direction and we look forward
to the results of the EFF board retreat before that.
 
Thanks,
Jon Lebkowsky


Newsgroups: austin.eff