HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: harvey@waikato.ac.nz
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Help identifing network cards
Date: 6 Jan 93 18:10:17 +1300
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

Hello to all who are reading this

I need some help with a couple of networking cards

First the card

I dn't have any documentation or any thing for this card only the physical
card. I am trying to 
			1/ Identify it
			2/ Get manuals and doc for it
			3/ Configure it to work for OS/2 and DOS
			4/ Find if its a good card

	The card:
			4"x6" Chips and things on one side
			2 coaxial (or similar) ports and one games port like
			connector
			2 green leds mounted between the games and coaxial bits
			
	Visable markings:
			1988 EARTH COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES
			Made in U.S.A.
			10035 REV C
			   BY TT
			
	Other things
			8 bit card
			20.000MHZ crystal on it
			8 dip switches in middle of card (currently 01110111)
			extra add on board about 1"x1.5" in middle of card with
			label KU 3294V-O T TDK

Can any body identify this card and if they can can they give me the address of
the manufacturer and can somebody tell me about the OS/2 compatbility???

Failing this I am at present trying to get 3 PC clones, one 386sx25 with 8 megs
and OS/2 running DBridge and 2 CDroms and Two modems, two 286's, to share the
data on their disks. This will save me having to have three copies of files (1
on each hard disk). I would like a configuration which would support this idea
(speed is not important as the modems are only 16800). I also have a copy of
lantastic Z if any one knows how to get this to run under OS/2

Thanks for your time

Mark Harvey
From: weber@rhrk.uni-kl.de (Christoph Weber-Fahr [KIT])
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: Novell Requester NSD 2.01 problems?
Date: 7 Jan 93 17:32:01 GMT
Organization: University of Kaiserslautern, Germany

gerry@pizzabox.dialogic.com (Gerry Lachac) writes:
>I could never get the Novell Requestor 2.01 NSD to work.  It wouldn't
>even find my file server on an OS/2 2.0 GA system with no TCP/IP
>software installed.  Since I tried it I have gone back to the GA of
>the Novell Requestor and began using FTP's PC/TCP with almost no
>problems - can't get Da Vinci email to work.

>Does the Novell update fix anything "deadly" or is it a minor
>upgrade??

Don't know for sure, but since the security upgrade contains NSD2.02,
wy bother ? I'm quite happy with the 2.02.

Regards

Christoph Weber-Fahr

BTW - has anybody read the install help-files ? They are full of comments 
regarding "Netware for OS/2 V.4.00". Seems to be a Netware Server on OS/2.
Is there any announcement published yet ?

-- 
  Christoph Weber-Fahr                  |  E-Mail:  weber@rhrk.uni-kl.de 
  Universitaet Kaiserslautern,  KIT     |  S-Mail:  Postfach 3049
  Tel. 0631/205-3391                    |           D-6750 Kaiserslautern
--------------------------  My personal opinion only    ---------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: rluoma@hila.hut.fi (Rauno Luoma)
Subject: IPX/SPX driver problem ?
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 08:19:17 GMT

Hello

I have a problem with Novell Netware V3.22

It will load virtual IPX/SPX driver in DOS session, but when I try to
use FTP Sofware Pcket Driver for 8003 adapters (ver 2.03) it will not work.
According the install.doc file the problem is that my IPX/SPX driver
is too old version. (I got it just three months ago)

So is there somewhere a newer driver or what I can do.

An other question is that I am interesting to use my computer as
an X-terminal. I like to what sofware should be the best in that
purpose.

Thanks.
Rauno Luoma                                phone +358-0-4512778
Lic.Tech.                                  internet Rauno.Luoma@hut.fi
Helsinki University of Technology
Laboratory of Metallurgy                   home  +358-0-822426
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: assela@aix.rpi.edu (A. Andre Asselin)
Subject: Re: IBM TCP/IP and PPP ?
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 19:19:31 GMT

mwaldorf@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Matthias Waldorf) writes:
>Is there a way to use PPP with TCP/IP 1.2.1 ? Any ideas are welcome !

Matthias,
   Currently, there is no PPP support in TCP/IP.  IBM is aware that a good
number of people have been calling for this, so hopefully it'll make it
into the product some day.

    - Andre Asselin (assela@rpi.edu)
From: laird@thistle.ecn.purdue.edu (Kyler Laird)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: Lan Server questions
Date: 12 Jan 93 19:10:01 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network

mg15@prism.gatech.EDU (Glynn,Mike) writes:

>I have 2 questions about IBM Lan Server 3.0.
> 1) Is there an upgrade from Lan Server 2.0 advanced?

Yes, if you can get the EA(?) price, it's $180.  I just put through the
P.O. for mine, and an IBM rep. is supposed to drop it off within a few
hours.

Also, there are a slew of upgrades from other LAN packages.  (I say slew
because IBM, of course, has a different product for every combination of
package being upgraded from and LS 3.0 Entry/Advanced.)  There was also
a special going on until the end of '92.  Sorry.  Maybe it will return.

> 2) Is there support for Ungermann-Bass adapters with the
>    DOS Lan Requester?

Hmmm...I don't usually use DOS requesters, but I have noticed Ungermann-
Bass adapters as an option - at least for OS/2 requesters.  I doubt they'd
not support them under DOS as well.  (I realize what I'm saying is not
what you're looking for - a guarantee - but it may give you enough
reinforcement to get to someone who can tell you what you need to know.)

Good luck!

--kyler
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: 880506s@dragon.acadiau.ca (James R. Skinner)
Subject: Connecting two machines with SLIP
Organization: Acadia University
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 20:42:32 GMT

	
I was wondering if it is possible to connect two PC's via a serial cable and
network then together with IBM's TCP/IP implementation of SLIP.  If so has any
one had any experience doing this or ideas on how to appraoch it?

-- 

-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
        James Robie Skinner        |     Jodrey School of Computer Science        James.Skinner@dragon.acadiau.ca  |  Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada
-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: mdivya@world.std.com (Marigowda Divya)
Subject: OS/2 ES Token-Ring 3270 Configuration
Summary: OS/2 ES Token-Ring 3270 Configuration
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 01:48:40 GMT

Is there any way to specify the HOST SAP number for the
Token-Ring 3270 connection?  I vaguely remember reading that
you can't do it using the menus, but there was a Keyword that
you could specify in the NDF file.  Anyone know about this?

Thanks in advance.

Marigowda Divya
GSOFT
(mdivya@world.std.com)
From: keating@casemo.UUCP (John Keating )
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: IBM TCP/IP X
Date: 5 Jan 93 16:19:11 GMT
Organization: Cray Communications, Inc.

'ello all...

I'm planning on trying out IBM's TCP/IP product, and have some questions
before I fill out the purchase req...

(1) Does the base package (02G6968) come with an NFS client, or do I
    need to purchase the NFS Kit (02G6970)?

(2) Without starting a flamewar, what features does it have that the FTP
    software doesn't have, and vice-versa?

(3) With the X-Window System (02G6980), will it allow me to display Sun's
    OpenWindows programs?  (This is probably the most important one, as
    out suns are running OpenWindows, and I'd like to be able to access
    tools such as the editor tool, mail tool, etc...)

(4) How easy is the installation?  One hour, two, four, three days?

Thanks much!

John
-- 
      John William Keating, III      /-----------------------------------------
 -+=< Cray Communications, Inc. >=+- | If you do something stupid after reading
 formerly: Dowty Communications Inc. | this message, it is your own fault, not
   keating%casemo@mimsy.cs.umd.edu   | mine nor the company I work for.  -me-
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: rjberke@berke.itg.ti.com (Richard Berke)
Subject: NDIS drivers - both OS/2 and DOS concurrently?
Organization: Electronic Communications
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:04:39 GMT

I have my system configured to use OS/2 LAN Server requester, of
course using OS/2 NDIS drivers.

Now I need to also run a DOS/Windows communications application
(No OS/2 version exists) that also expects its NDIS driver to be
bound to an ethernet driver.  I even have a second board installed
that I can/want to dedicate to the DOS/Windows comm.  I'm familiar
with running multiple boards, and multiple protocols, both concurrently
and dedicated, for strictly DOS/Windows.  OS/2 seems to spawn off a
DOS Window when it finds the DOS NDIS components, so I expect some
other configuration is needed to activate a DOS-usable instance of
a PROTMAN.

What do I need to do?  Is this possible?  Can anyone share a 
sample of config files?

Thanks,
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: teague@a.cs.okstate.edu (Keith Teague)
Subject: Re: is UB02274 still the latest CSD for TCP/IP 1.2.1 ? 
Organization: Oklahoma State University
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 93 19:03:16 GMT

From article <C0JMEG.7yt@rice.edu>, by schafer@is.rice.edu (Richard Alan Schafer):
> I believe the latest CSDs are:
> 
> UN32131 - Base
> UN32132 - NFS
> UN30680 - PMX
> 
> I received these yesterday from IBM.
> -- 
> Richard

Could someone please post these to Hobbes if they are for general release?

Keith Teague

From: Gordon.Allen@f347.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Gordon Allen)
Sender: Uucp@blkcat.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: LANMan & NW Requesto
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 20:19:00 -0500

Is it possible to have interoperability between LANManager 2.1a and Netware
3.11 under OS/2 2.0?  I have both the Novell Requestor and LANManager 2.1a. 
Can I just install one on a workstation, then the other?   ___  
 * PMQWK 1.00b5 *
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: rgammon@pan1  (Robert Gammon)
Subject: Re: Lan Server 3.0
Nntp-Software: PC/TCP NNTP
Organization: Texas Instruments Materials and Controls Group
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 12:45:18 GMT

In article <1992Dec30.155956.13635@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> sci240s@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Wey Jing HO) writes:

 >> Does anybody know whether Lan Server 3.0 limit number of users
 >> at anyone time? For example, for Novell, you have to buy for example
 >> 20-users licence for 20 concurrent users. Is LS 3.0 similar?
 >> 

Nope, licensing is different.  My limited knowledge base leads me to suggest
that LS 3.0 Advanced (the more expensive of the two) is unlimited users, and
entry has a limit on the number of users.
--
Regards,
Robert Gammon
(713)-274-3299       (voice)
(713)-274-2324       (fax)
From: rommel@jonas.gold.sub.org (Kai Uwe Rommel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: TCP/IP CSD fixes CD-ROM export problem
Date: 9 Jan 93 10:43:52 GMT
Organization: Private

The new IBM TCP/IP BASE CSD (level now UN29511) fixes the NFS export
problems with removeable drives such as CD-ROM readers. I was able to
export the CD-ROM and even a floppy drive now (as long as there is a
floppy in the drive when NFSD starts).

It remains a bit unclear to me why the *NFS* problem is solved with
this *BASE* CSD, but when a bug gets fixed, one should not complain ... :-)

Kai Uwe Rommel

--
/* Kai Uwe Rommel                                      Muenchen, Germany *
 * rommel@jonas.gold.sub.org                       Phone +49 89 723 4101 *
 * rommel@informatik.tu-muenchen.de                  Fax +49 89 723 7889 */

DOS ... is still a real mode only non-reentrant interrupt
handler, and always will be.                -Russell Williams
From: penning@sumax.seattleu.edu (Mat Penning)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Named pipes - performance?
Date: 11 Jan 93 05:10:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: sumax.1isnohINNg4p
Distribution: usa
Organization: Seattle University
NNTP-Posting-Host: sumax.seattleu.edu

Is anyone aware of any performance problems, such as slowing down an entire
LAN, associate with using named pipes for communicating from an OS/2 client
(application server) to other OS/2 clients? It doesn't seem to me that this
would be the case, but I heard a rumor and am trying to find out if there is
any shred of truth to it.
From: dabl2@nlm.nih.gov (Don A.B. Lindbergh)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: IPX/SPX driver problem ?
Date: 12 Jan 93 19:30:41 GMT
Organization: National Library of Medicine

In article <1993Jan8.081917.4174@nntp.hut.fi> rluoma@hila.hut.fi (Rauno Luoma) writes:
>Hello
>
>I have a problem with Novell Netware V3.22
>
>It will load virtual IPX/SPX driver in DOS session, but when I try to
>use FTP Sofware Pcket Driver for 8003 adapters (ver 2.03) it will not work.
>According the install.doc file the problem is that my IPX/SPX driver
>is too old version. (I got it just three months ago)
>
>So is there somewhere a newer driver or what I can do.
>

To my knowledge running a DOS packet driver and the Requestor together is
still a problem, ie can't be done.  Sure wish there was a fix though.
I saved some posts from people talking about working it, any news?

--Don Lindbergh
dabl2@lhc.nlm.nih.gov
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: dabl2@nlm.nih.gov (Don A.B. Lindbergh)
Subject: Re: NetBIOS using Novell Requestor
Organization: National Library of Medicine
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 22:13:55 GMT

In article <1993Jan12.193556.943@nlm.nih.gov> dabl2@nlm.nih.gov (Don A.B. Lindbergh) writes:
>I've been running GA+SP with the Novell Requestor+CSD for a while now.
>This morning I've been trying to run the Netbios executable in a DOS box
>from the \NETWARE directory (ie v 3.1) and I get the header messages and
>that's all, it doesn't load and the session is hung.  I've confirmed the
>device driver is being loaded in the config.sys and of course vipx is enabled
>in the dos session.  If I don't use the requestor at all and use a packet
>driver, netbios loads fine.  Any clues?
>
>--Don Lindbergh
>dabl2@lhc.nlm.nih.gov
>
>

To followup my own post:

I did some more messing around and found that the version of Netbios in
my \NETWARE directory (v 3.1) will load fine using Novell's 'real' ipx????.com
(bound for my ne2000 at irq 2 and port 340).  So for me, it won't load using
the requestor's virtual ipx but WILL using the 'real' one.  Can anyone else
confirm this?  I wonder if setting the irq at 2 rather than the 'default' 5
could be causing the problem.  Doesn't seem like it since everything works
fine otherwise........Very frustrating, because I need netbios support in 
DOS sessions and would *like* OS/2 Netware support!  Unfortunately as I'm
sure many of you know, a call to Novell costs $150, and of course my dealer
doesn't run OS/2.  He can place a call to them on my behalf however.  I'm
hoping the experts here can offer some advice or at least tell me that it
either does or doesn't work for them.

--Don Lindbergh
dabl2@lhc.nlm.nih.gov
From: dabl2@nlm.nih.gov (Don A.B. Lindbergh)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: NetBIOS using Novell Requestor
Date: 12 Jan 93 19:35:56 GMT
Organization: National Library of Medicine

I've been running GA+SP with the Novell Requestor+CSD for a while now.
This morning I've been trying to run the Netbios executable in a DOS box
from the \NETWARE directory (ie v 3.1) and I get the header messages and
that's all, it doesn't load and the session is hung.  I've confirmed the
device driver is being loaded in the config.sys and of course vipx is enabled
in the dos session.  If I don't use the requestor at all and use a packet
driver, netbios loads fine.  Any clues?

--Don Lindbergh
dabl2@lhc.nlm.nih.gov
From: ed@balrog.aecom.yu.edu (Ed Geraghty)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: IBM TCP/IP and PPP ?
Date: 11 Jan 93 20:21:42 GMT
Organization: Albert Einstein College of Medicine -- Dynamic Brain Imaging Lab

In article <726724252snx@montage.UUCP> platinum@montage.UUCP (Doug Swallow) writes:
>sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes in article <1993Jan9.191351.15868@midway.uchicago.edu>:
>
>> Not yet, but reportedly PPP is slated for the next version.
>
>Four messages referring to PPP and not one says what it is and why I, as a
>TCP/IP user, may care.  What is it? :-)
>
>--

PPP Point-to-Point Protocol is a means to transmit network packets over
serial and leased lines. It is similar in function to SLIP but it has
much better features. Like (ondemand link activation, link timeout) look
in comp.protocols.ppp their is a FAQ. Basically it like being on the backbone
from a remote machine.

                                    See Ya,

                                    Ed G.

*******************************************************************************
Ed Geraghty                         |  "There is no true escape - I am watching 
Systems Manager                     |   all the time..." - JP "Electric Eye"
Albert Einstein College of Medicine | 
Dynamic Brain Imaging Lab           |  "Whenever you dream, you're holding a 
Bronx, NYC 10461                    |   key. It opens a door to let you be 
email: geraghty@aecom.yu.edu        |   free" - Ronnie James Dio
*******************************************************************************
From: francis@ese.ogi.edu (Francis Moraes)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: X-progs for TCPIP
Date: 12 Jan 93 19:05:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: ogicse.48404
Organization: Oregon Graduate Institute - Department of Env. Science and Eng.

mparker@st.nepean.uws.edu.au (Fluro) writes:

>I would like to know if anyone has ported any X-programs for
>IBMS X-Windows...  Where do you get the X-library's neccessary
>to compile X-progs in OS/2... I use tcpip only on pc machines,
>and would like to use X-windows for its ability to run programs
>across the lan on others screens...

I haven't seen any programs ported, except xhello. The libraries are
available from IBM but I don't know the cost (I've tried to find out
but it is very hard to order things from IBM at times). Does anyone
have a price for this?

>Some programs i would like to see is:
>
>X-term (or some shell program)

You could just telnet to the other machine...

Francis
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: rolfe@ldp.com (Rolfe Tessem)
Subject: Re: OS/2 w/PPP
Reply-To: rolfe@ldp.com
Organization: Lucky Duck Productions
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 20:50:59 GMT

In article <1993Jan12.035411.1650@cognet.ucla.edu> dwells@cognet.ucla.edu  
(David Wells) writes:
> ed@balrog.aecom.yu.edu (Ed Geraghty) writes:
> 
> >In article <mwaldorf.726573728@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE>  
mwaldorf@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Matthias Waldorf) writes:
> >>Is there a way to use PPP with TCP/IP 1.2.1 ? Any ideas are welcome !
> 
> >I know of no PPP software ported to OS/2. 
> 
> *sigh*, and here I thought that I had it all worked out.  I'm buying a 
> system in a few weeks, and had planned on running os/2 w/ppp.  So can
> I run ppp under a windows session?  But then why not just get Desqview/X?
> Any suggestions?

I believe that KA9Q NOS for OS/2 (a freeware package available from uscd.edu)  
supports both SLIP and PPP. It does not yet support any networking cards (in  
it's OS/2 incarnation.)

-- 
Rolfe Tessem				Lucky Duck Productions
rolfe@ldp.com				New York City
(212) 463-0029				(212) 463-7049 fax
Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.networking:2642 comp.os.os2.misc:41718
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: tape backup via tcp/ip
Date: 9 Jan 93 01:16:39 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.networking
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1ijtcp$ld5@agate.berkeley.edu> jp1ek@sunc.shef.ac.uk writes:
>after a fair amount of rtfm, i am stumped. is the ibm implementation
>of tcp/ip really so braindead as to have no provision for doing
>something like
>local_programme | rcmd machine -l user remote_command
>the rsh command for os2 is a joke compared to the unix version. is
>this inherent in os2 or is it the result of a poor implementation?

Poor implementation, it seems.  Hopefully they'll fix this oversight.
There's a new CSD out for base services TCP/IP, and it should be
available any day now from ftp-os2.nmsu.edu via anonymous ftp (check
/pub/uploads/sharebbs initially).  Has anyone determined whether rsh
has been revised?

>why is there no rcp command in os2 tcp/ip? is this impossible because
>of os2 design or because of a poor implementation?

Check the SAMPLES directory -- there might be something there you can
use (hint).

Also, there's a third party rcp-equivalent.  You can obtain it from
the above mentioned ftp site.  Check the file /pub/os2/00Index on that
site for location.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
From: mp52+@andrew.cmu.edu (Matthew Edward Patton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: OS2 X windows server? client or both?
Date: 12 Jan 93 13:06:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.8fIowAW00iUxQ6yzN2
Organization: Sophomore, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

the Q. is quite simple. Before I shell out considerable dough is the X
support a client AND server or just a client?

Thanks

==================================================================
                     Laws of Computer Programming

1. Any given program, by the time it is up and running is obsolete.
2. Any given program costs more and takes longer than planned and budgeted.
3. Inside every large program is a small program struggling to get out.
4. Program complexity grows until it exceeds the capability of the programmer
   who must maintain it.
5. At the source of every error which is blamed on the computer, you will
   find at least two human errors, including the error of blaming it on the
   computer.

Press F4 to exit menu.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: schafer@is.rice.edu (Richard Alan Schafer)
Subject: Re: is UB02274 still the latest CSD for TCP/IP 1.2.1 ? 
Organization: Rice University
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 16:13:27 GMT

I believe the latest CSDs are:

UN32131 - Base
UN32132 - NFS
UN30680 - PMX

I received these yesterday from IBM.
-- 
Richard
From: lopes@cogsci.ucsd.EDU (alann lopes)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: NFS CSD
Keywords: OS2 NFS CSD
Date: 9 Jan 93 20:25:11 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego



   First, I want to thank the gentle person who uploaded the
   tcpip CSDs to hobbs. THANK YOU!!

   Second, I'd like to ask a favor -- could someone who has
   the latest NFS CSD also upload it to hobbes.

         Thank you all very much -- alann


   alann lopes:        alopes@ucsd.edu       -- internet
   (619) 534-5438      ALOPES@UCSD           -- bitnet
From: platinum@montage.UUCP (Doug Swallow)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: IBM TCP/IP and PPP ?
Distribution: world
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 03:50:52 GMT
Organization: Software Environments, Inc.

sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes in article <1993Jan9.191351.15868@midway.uchicago.edu>:

> Not yet, but reportedly PPP is slated for the next version.

Four messages referring to PPP and not one says what it is and why I, as a
TCP/IP user, may care.  What is it? :-)

--
/ Doug Swallow
|Internet:   platinum@montage.uucp     |Mail: 7927 Clubhouse Estates Dr.
|CompuServe: 75776,1011                |      Orlando, Florida 32819-5026
|Phone:      407-236-0153              |Fax:  407-352-3111