HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cpm@clyde.clearpoint.com (Chris Martel)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: AFC's best in 1985
Date: 8 Oct 92 15:56:52 GMT
	<1992Oct7.180724.3495@ncar.ucar.edu>
	<CPM.92Oct7171349@clyde.clearpoint.com>
	<1992Oct7.224425.2321@ncar.ucar.edu>
Reply-To: cpm@clyde.clearpoint.com
Organization: Clearpoint Research Corp, Hopkinton MA 01748

In article <1992Oct7.224425.2321@ncar.ucar.edu> gary@colossus.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) writes:


cm> Chris Martel

cm> The Pats defense, special teams, and running attack beat Miami. It was not
    a case of 'The rignt bounces of the ball'. The Pats forced 6 turnovers in
    each of their 3 playoff games leading up to the SB.

>Yep, the Pat defense played well for those three games. Too bad they played
>so poorly in the SB. 


The 85 Pats won 3 of 4 post season games. All the wins came on the road. 
Miami had two home games and won 1 of 2, barely beating the Browns. Miami 
is the best in the AFC? Why didn't they go to the SB then?


cm> Concerning that Miami victory over the Bears, combine McMahon's absence
    from the game (or had limited snaps), his replacement (Tomzak?) did
    not play well, a loud Orange bowl crowd, and Marinos quick release and 
    you have a victory. 

>A 38-24 victory? What happened to the vaunted Bears defense? They managed
>to shut down New England and win 20-7 the 2nd week of the season. In any
>case, none of the factors you mention have anything to do with the Bears'
>defense, which is what really cost them the game.

The Bears played 19 games winning 18 and their defense had a letdown in 1 
game. It just happened to be against Miami. This makes Miami the best in 
the AFC even when they played poorly in the playoffs?

cm> Marino's quick release might have made the SB a little closer, but the
    best team in the AFC in 1985 was either the Pats or the Raiders.

>A toss-up between Miami, the Jets, the Pats, the Broncos and the Raiders,
>I'd say, since all did 11-5 or better, Miami having an edge since they beat
>Chicago.

The Pats beat the Jets, the Raiders, and Miami in the playoffs when it 
counts. Three of the four teams you mention. Why does this result in
Miami getting the edge? why not NE? Oh yeh I forgot, because they beat the 
Bears in the regular season. The one victory 'claim to fame'.


>--
>Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
>strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
From: swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Steve Williams)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: SECRET INSIDE  OPEN LEAGUE
Date: 14 Oct 92 17:36:34 GMT
Reply-To: swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Steve Williams)
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center

In rec.sport.football.pro, alb2001@andy.bgsu.edu (Alvino Battistoni) writes:
 >
 >        I am from Buffalo and I am kind of a BILLS fan....

Your first mistake is to be a BILLS fan.  :-)

 >   Interesting match-ups for this week include:
 >   Philladelphia  vs.  Washington
 >   I like Philly

Your second mistake is liking Philly.

 >   Kansas City  vs.  Dallas
 >   I like K.C.

Finally, a good decision.

 >   Houston  vs.  Denver
 >   I like Houston

You're on the roll!  Another good decision!

 >PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR INSIGHTS!

BILLS will lose again this weekend!  :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Steve Williams                           swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: pc0837@sarah.albany.edu (COHEN PAUL L)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Colts and Bills
Date: 14 Oct 92 20:05:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: sarah.1992Oct14.200516.8109
Organization: State University of New York at Albany

In article <Bw4Fxu.L60@acsu.buffalo.edu> v130pwbq@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
>I don't know how many of you out there have noticed but after this sunday's
>game, at home against I believe Cleveland, the Indianapolis Colts could be
>4-2. This would put them in a tie with the Bills. When you think about it,
>it's kinda funny how a team that went 1-15 last year could be tied with a
>team that went 13-3 and to the Super Bowl the same year.  
>    _____________________________________________________________________
>   |   Miami Dolphins and Hurricanes:        * Eric Orologio " Dr. O"    |
>   |   Two of the Best teams in Football!    * V130pwbq @ubvms           |
>   |_____________________________________________________________________|

Wow, I didn't really think about that untill your posting. The Colts
probably will win this week, and be in a tie with the Bills. However,
look for the Bills to come back from their off week stronger than ever.
The Colts on the other hand will probably start to sway away from
victories.

THIS IS JUST A THOUGHT, PLEASE DON'T WRITE NASTY LETTERS ABOUT THIS.
I ENCOURAGE YOU TO DISAGREE AND RESPOND, BUT I AM TELLING YOU NOW:

I AM NOT CRAZY, STUPID, FOOLISH, ETC.
From: v130pwbq@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: New Bills Song
Date: 12 Oct 92 17:06:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

To the Music of "You make me wanna Shout" The New Bills song goes like this:

" The Bills make me wanna.......























































....LAUGH."  Everyone sing together now...

    _____________________________________________________________________
   |  "Life's a Bitch and then we all        * Eric Orologio " Dr. O"    |
   |   get fucked"                           * V130pwbq @ubvms           |
   |_____________________________________________________________________|
From: david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Will SF win the division?
Date: 7 Oct 92 23:06:56 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu


In article <BvqGtq.BEp@acsu.buffalo.edu> v130pwbq@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
|>Will the 49ers win the division?
| Answer : Yes
...

One thing you mention a few times is your hope that the Niner's
secondary will improve to "Playoff Status". This gives them, in your
opinion, a good chance to beat one of the Dolphins/Skins and NO the
second time. Even though I am a 49er fan, I find that their defense is
very weak--I think they are second worst in the NFC or their division.
What makes you think that the secondary will improve?

As to Atlanta, I am not sure of their record. I think that they are
not doing so well. Do you happen to have their record handy?
-- 
   |^^^^^^|      _______________________________________________________
   |      |      |"There is nothing in the marginal conditions that    | 
   |      |      | distinguish a mountain from a mole hill"            |
   | (o)(o)      O         Kenneth Boulding                            | 
   @      _)    o|_____________________________________________________|  
    |  ____\ o o
    |     /   
   /     \                              All comments  are mine---(David Wright) 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mkr@postman.hsn.no (MORTEN KRISTIANSEN)
Subject: Another Jets victory
Organization: Nordland College
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 13:26:01 GMT

Browning Nagle: 300+ yards  3 tdowns
Blair Thomas:   120+ yards  1 tdown 
Moore&Toon :    200+ yards  2 tdowns
To make a long story short : Ny Jets   42   Indy  7

Go Jets :-)
From: tap1040@venus.tamu.edu (SPEED RACER)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: EAGLES WILL GO 15-1 AND WIN THE SUPERBOWL AND KILL THE REDGIRLS
Date: 16 Oct 92 04:25:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: venus.15OCT199223254983
Distribution: usa
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Oct15.151214.1249@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>, aperkins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Aaron B. Perkins) writes...
> 
>OK OK OK MY MIGHTY EAGLES LOST TO THE DUDLY CHEFS (THEY COOKED A MEAN LONGBALL)

..babble that we are gradually growing accustomed to deleted...

> 
>signed                     JULIUS THE LEGENDARY PREDICTOR
> 
>quiz                WHO HOLDS THE RECORD FOR THE MOST REBOUNDS IN AN NBA GAME
>                    AND HOW MANY?


Quiz question number 2:

Who holds the record for the most obnoxious, meaningless posts in an NFL
season and how many?   

Answer:  Aaron Perkins (a.k.a.-Julius the blithering idiot)
         How many?  Even my computer cannot count that high.

___________________________________________________________________________
Tracy Persky           Texas A&M University           tap1040@zeus.tamu.edu

John Madden: "There's a good sign.  Troy Aikman putting his pants back on."
Pat Summerall: "That's ALWAYS a good sign."  (RFK Stadium, Nov. 24, 1991)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jch@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (jeffrey.c.halle)
Subject: Re: Dallas was beaten by bad luck, not the eagles!
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 14:09:04 GMT

From article <6OCT199223190496@rigel.tamu.edu>, by c1h3384@rigel.tamu.edu :
> Again, it was bad luck, NOT the eagles, who beat the Cowboys. Believe it or

You're absolutely right.  It was Dallas' bad luck - to be playing the
Eagles instead of Cumberland Tech.
From: patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Some observations
Date: 8 Oct 92 21:26:07 GMT
Reply-To: patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Richardson, Tx

In article <1992Oct08.174916.5049@bnr.ca>, emilio@crchh444.BNR.CA (Emilio Rivera) writes:
|> In article <92282.104944RZANDBER@ESOC.BITNET>, RENE ZANDBERGEN
|> <RZANDBER@ESOC.BITNET> writes:
|>   (stuff deleted)
|> 
|> |>Now some questions from a foreigner.
|> 
|> |>2) Who is this player called K-mart and why is he called that?
|> 
|>      I can help with this one.  K-Mart is Kelvin Martin of the Dallas
|>     Cowboys.  He plays the third receiver in a 3-WR package.  He
|>     also returns punts and kickoffs.   He was given the name of K-Mart
|>     by his teammates when he joined the Cowboys because he is
|>    'special'.  Get it ?  K-Mart special is what a national store chain
|>     uses to promote sales.   Maybe Mr. Power can back me up on this
|>     one.
|> 
|> 
    
           
   The Kmart store had a policy of hourly type sales which were announced 
   over the PA system.  All you had to do was look for the flashing blue 
   lights. 


         If it were not for Bates getting in the way,  the 'boys would
   have had another "K-Mart Blue Light Special" on that kickoff Monday.


-- 
The small victories * the cankers and medallions *         | Pat Power
The little nothings * they keep me thinking that someday * | My opinions only
I might beat you * But I'll just keep my mouth shut *      |
       - Faith No More, "A Small Victory"                  | Da Boyz are back!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Updates - Scores
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 02:19:24 GMT

FINAL SCORES: week 6

Atlanta  17		   Miami  21  *FINAL            
Philadelphia  17	Kansas City  24  *FINAL
Phoenix  21		   NY Giants  31  *FINAL        
San Francisco  24  New England  *FINAL  12
Pittsburgh  9	   Cleveland  17  *FINAL     
Seattle  0	      Dallas  27  *FINAL           

Buffalo	3 LA     Raiders  20 * FINAL
Houston	38       Cincinnati   24 * FINAL
NY Jets  6 	      Indianapolis  3  * OT * FINAL
Rams  10	         New Orleans  13 * FINAL
                               

-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  Let us be thankful for the fools; but for them the rest
  of us could not succeed.  -   Mark Twain
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: edg@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (edwin.g.green)
Subject: Re: Colts and Bills
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 13:36:19 GMT

In article <Bw4Fxu.L60@acsu.buffalo.edu> v130pwbq@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
>I don't know how many of you out there have noticed but after this sunday's
>game, at home against I believe Cleveland, the Indianapolis Colts could be
>4-2. This would put them in a tie with the Bills. When you think about it,
>it's kinda funny how a team that went 1-15 last year could be tied with a
>team that went 13-3 and to the Super Bowl the same year.  
>    _____________________________________________________________________
>   |   Miami Dolphins and Hurricanes:        * Eric Orologio " Dr. O"    |
>   |   Two of the Best teams in Football!    * V130pwbq @ubvms           |
>   |_____________________________________________________________________|

The Colts are playing San Diego on Sunday.  We are 2 point favorites (first
time in over a year that we are favored).  However, it should be noted that
we got the hell beat out of us by Buffalo at Buffalo.

What I think is kind of funny is that the Colts play SD, Miami, SD, and
Miami over the next four weeks.

Ed Green


-- 
Edwin G. Green
AT&T Bell Laboratories          Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
INH 1E-506                      317-845-3659
egg@inuxy.att.com
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Give Cowboys a 'lil credit
Date: 8 Oct 1992 18:33:59 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Howard Hughes Medical Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <keoS=pu00Voi8qBLEd@andrew.cmu.edu> "Joseph E. Beck" <jb8n+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>
>
>>Philly is my second favorite team, but Dallas deserves some credit.
>>They were able to gain productive yards against one of the best 
>>defenses of all time, in their backyard.
>
>Yes they were, but it was high risk yardage.  Dallas had very little
>luck at pulling off 4 yard running plays (if you discount Smith's long
>run at the end of the first half his average looked really pathetic),
>and instead had to rely on medium and long passes.  When they work
>you get lots of yards, but you have a high risk of interception.  So
>you can gain lots of yards but it's not likely you can sustain a
>drive.

High risk yardage??  I don't think so.  Eagle DT Mike Golic was on the
radio the day after the game and said that most of the Cowboys yardage
was the result of possession (ie. *low* risk) plays, most notably in
the first half.  That's why they were able to drive 84 yards for a
TD and again to the 1 before the interception by Hopkins at the goal
line.  The "high risk of interception" had nothing to do with the
interceptions in this game.  On the first Aikman INT, it was a combination
of an underthrown ball by Troy and a nice play by John Booty.  However,
if Troy had hit the intended receiver in stride it might've gone for 6.
The second INT was batted in the air like a professional volleyball dig
when Hopkins plucked it.  The third came when Troy's arm was hit while
throwing.  When things are going your way these balls are caught by
your own players for big plays, when things aren't going your way, it
makes for big plays by the other team.  In most cases, these balls 
fall to the ground.  The point is, the INTs didn't come from "high
risk plays".
As far as Smith's running goes, you are obviously using the Dan Dierdorf
method of calculating yards-per-carry, subtract any runs which, in the
opinion of the author, are meaningless.


Ray     GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: paul@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Greg Paul)
Subject: Re: Dallas was beaten by bad luck, not the eagles!
Organization: Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 17:59:23 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.184439.9071@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>In article <6OCT199216262371@rigel.tamu.edu> c1h3384@rigel.tamu.edu  writes:
>>
>>Look at last night's game, a break here and there would have turned the game
>>to the opposite direction. Eagles got all the breaks --- Cunningham fumbled
>>twice, and lost none. Dallas was bad luck, especially in the first half ---
>>Martin's kick return should go all the way to give the Cowboys's a 14-10
>>lead. Instead, he bumped with his own guy and was stopped with even resulting
>>a field goal to tie the score at 10.
>
>Give me a break.  What you are calling "luck" is execution?  I suppose
>Dallas is the best team of all time, and can only lose when bad luck occurs.
>
>>Besides, one weekness of the Cowboys was the rockie kicker. That made the
>>decision at the end of the first half extremely difficult for Jimmy. At
>>the eagle 33, he opted to try to draw the eagles offside on 4th down. If he
>>had a more consistent kicker, he would rather kick the field goal to tie
>>it. 
>>
>>Oh, well, I am not impressed at all by the eagles. Granted, their defense
>>is the best right now, but how about their offense? Cunningham is a so-so
>>QB, definitely not the most completed QB in the game, IMHO.
>
>Maybe they are good, maybe they aren't.  But a 31-7 loss to me does not
>sound like a game that could go one way or another.  What is it with you
>Dallas fans that you feel the need to console yourselves like this after
>every loss?

   I think they really got it going in earnest last season after getting
slaughtered by Detroit twice.  I mean afterall, Dallas won at Washington,
so there must have just been some kinda fluke in Pontiac.

>
>Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu


--
========================== Will be President for food ==========================
Greg Paul  (Mouser)		  |  paul@enuxha.eas.asu.edu  GO SPARTANS!!
MSCS student, Insight technician  |     Triangle Fraternity
____________ "My words but a whisper, your deafness a shout..." -JT ____________
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Go GIANTS!)
Subject: Re: current League Stats Please
Organization: Yale University Computing & Information Systems
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 12:16:34 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.184102.16258@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:

>>>In article <Adriene_Nazaretian.63.718897011@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Go GIANTS!) writes:
>>>>Would someone with some time on their hands please post the current NFL 
>>>>standings after monday's game.  Thnx 
>>>>Adriene L. Nazaretian        
>>>>Yale University              
>>>>ADRIENE@YALEADS.BITNET        
>>>>ADRIENE@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU  
>>

Thanks for the FAX.

>>>NINERS WIN THE SB! :-)  Ok, Adriene, wanna make a bet that
>>>the Niners will make it to the SB and the Giants will not?
>>>-- 
>>
>>Geez, I said I was a Giants FAN, I'm realistic, NOT STUPID or that 
>>bullheaded...  
>>
>>I will betcha the 9ers WONT make it to the SB this year, PERIOD.
>>  
>>Hmmm what could we bet....
>>What could YOU have that I would want.... hmmmm
>>
>How about a brand new Sparc 2 with 32MB memory,
>424MB hard drive, color of course. You will then have
>a REAL UNIX WORKSTATION just like mine. :-) No, only
>kidding, I would never bet my SPARC 2 away. :-)

>Besides my SPARC 2, this 6'3", 225lb, dark, handsome guy probably
>does not have anything you would want. :-)

oooooh, just my type....
But then again so is the Sparc! Yikes, I'm not sure which offer to drool 
over ;-)  But let me guess, you're either married, gay, or HIV positive.  
Just kidding! What do you say we move this over to alt.sex.BONDAGE!

I still have some good suggestions coming in for the bet. 
The best one being that the loser must take a picture of themselves in their 
favorite team jersey without pants on, yes in their underwear, with a banner 
over their head admitting they were WRONG.  The picture must then be scanned 
in, encoded and sent to this list for all to see.

Still want to bet?  The Niners are winning, but very unconvincing wins...
Think about it.

Adriene L. Nazaretian        
Yale University              
ADRIENE@YALEADS.BITNET        
ADRIENE@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske)
Subject: Re: Bermanisms
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 14:39:40 GMT

schnell@pyramid.unr.edu ( Dan Schnell ) writes:

>Berman has one that I don't understand. 

>Tampa Bay (I think) reciever 

>Willie "Soviet" Drury

>It just doesn't "click"...

This is kind of an oddball one.  It is based on a term that was in the
news quite a bit back before the fall of the Soviet Union.
Jewry is the word for Jewish people collectively, so we get Soviet Jewry
for the jewish people in the Soviet Union, and Soviet Drury for a Bermanism.

John Ganske
From: un032221@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: <None>
Date: 12 Oct 92 18:34:17 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <1992Oct6.155740.29230@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>, ric@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (ricardo.g.irvin) writes:
> In article <1687794C6.TSTEEGM3@ua1vm.ua.edu> TSTEEGM3@ua1vm.ua.edu (Tom Steegmann) writes:
>>     No , I'm not a Perot supporter.  That has nothing to do with football,
>>therefore has no significance whatsoever. Now lets discuss the real
>>issue facing Bills fans.  In super bowl XXV, the bills played an
>>inferior Giants team.  They were outcoached, and lost, albeit by a
>  ???????
>>slim margin.  ....
> 
> Thats a joke, right Tom ?
> I know this is not your main point, but, In no way was the GIANTS of 89
> "inferior" to the Bills. And they prove that 2 out of the 3 times they met
> that year. Just because they did not score 40 points per game like the
> Bills did does'nt make "inferior". 
> I basically remember  the GIANTS driving the Bills
> Def. Linemen down field and spiking them in the End Zone 8{D.

	No, They were definately inferior, though that makes it sound worse
than it was.  The Giants did not have as much talent, on EITHER side of the
ball as did the Bills.  The Giants did however:
	-use a defense that Kelly had not seen, using only three down linemen,
and dropping most, if not all their LBs into coverage every down.
	-pummeled the Bills WRs every time they got in the general vicinity of
the ball
	-played like a team that had been pumped up before the game
	-Used Hostetler's mobility to roll away from the potent pass rush of
Bruce Smith and Co.
	And the Bills:
	-Came into the game with 0 new wrinkles to their team,
	-Did not seem to really want to win that badly,
	-did not adjust to anything unorthodox that the Giants did,
	-and simply did not use Thurman Thomas enough (though he did have 100+
rushing yards, and should have gotten the MVP over Ottis Anderson.)

	The Bills were simply outcoached.  Oh, and by the way it was the Giants
of 1990, not '89.
	-Skins fan with an itchy trigger finger
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com (Bob Ashley)
Subject: Re: Elway on Video
Reply-To: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com
Organization: GTE Federal Systems Division
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 22:15:07 GMT

In article 69032@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU,  hanke@CS.ColoState.EDU (brandon laine hanke) writes:
>Last night on TV I heard that Pat Bowlen, Denver's owner, is thinking of
>putting all of John Elway's come from behind performances on video tape.
>If he does this I know I'll be one of the first in line to get mine. Can
>you imagine having all of that excitement packed onto one video tape.
>
>Just some information I thought you would like to know.
>

Just another reason as to why people hate the Denver Broncos and/or John Elway.


Bob   ...  *sigh*

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Ashley                        Internet:  Bob.Ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com

Software Engineer, (703)-818-4656  | Winter Bowling Leagues 1992-1993
   GTE Federal Systems Division    |    GTE FSD Mixed Secretary: Thu 17:45
   15000 Conference Center Drive   |    Thursday Mixups:         Thu 20:30
   Chantilly, VA   22021-3808      |    NFL Mixed Secretary:     Mon 21:00



Organization: Masters student, Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,cmu.misc.market
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 1992 09:19:05 -0400 
From: Brennan Kraje <nk0s+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Monday Night FB TIX SALE


    Sorry folks, tickets have been sold...

                                - Brennan

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro