HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: berninge@cs.purdue.edu (Jim Berninger)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: QL: Comic book, not 12 but 13
Date: 28 Jan 1993 13:06:54 -0500
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: cornwall.cs.purdue.edu

In article <1993Jan28.172941.23746@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> acb@cory.Berkeley.EDU (aka Angelo Muscat) writes:
>Previews is out. Scheduled for release April 27th is
>the QUANTUM LEAP(tm) ANNUAL #1, from INNOVATION...
>
>I won't post the synopsis here, since I actually got
>email from people that were upset, because I did not
>label my posting regarding the contents of the QL 
>parody comic as a spoiler....   ("Oh, Boy -- !")

I regularly post synopses of the QL comic to rec.arts.comics.misc
and rec.arts.tv (recently added rec.arts.sf.tv) as I receive the
books.  The posts are related to the Quantum Leap Comic Guide which
I maintain, available by FTP through ziggy.cisco.com (aka cisco.com
or ftp.cisco.com), or e-mail me for a copy.

I've never received complaints regarding my synopses -- whether
that's because I try to avoid spoilers or because nobody actually
reads them, I don't know...

 ______ Jim Berninger: berninge@cs.purdue.edu|Hate is not a Family Value ______
 \ \  /   Green Lantern Fan, Extraordinaire  |     Boycott Colorado      \ \  /
  \/\/ "I don't *wanna* play Leona Helmsley!"| Think twice about Oregon   \/\/
   \/      -- Elmyra Duff, Tiny Toons Xmas   |Watch out for OH,ID,MI,ME,FL.\/..
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: mae@aplpy.jhuapl.edu (Mary Anne Espenshade)
Subject: Re: QL: Two-Faced Reviews: Dr. Ruth
Organization: Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 22:11:15 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.171510.22654@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>
baylor@NEBULA.SSD.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.220603.2963@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu>
>mae@aplpy.jhuapl.edu (Mary Anne Espenshade) writes:
>>Possible spoilers for the Dr. Ruth episode of Quantum Leap.
>
>>We do NOT really have any proof (I don't consider snide remarks from
>>Ziggy proof of anything :-) ) that Tina has ever been involved with
>>Gooshie, just that they were married in a radically different time-line
>>in which Al didn't even exist. Hardly enough to base a judgement of the
>>episode on.
>
>You think Sam programmed Ziggy to be capable of lying? 
No, but I think Ziggy exceeds his programming.  And, given the number
of time line changes affecting the situation, what is true at any
particular present?

>In fact Al found out about Tina & Gooshie once, but thinks the affair 
>is over. So sorry, I don't remember which episode.
Not quite, but everyone seems to be making the same assumption.  In
"How the Tess Was Won", second season, Al finds out that Tina went to
Las Vegas with Gooshie.  She was trying to make Al jealous, and
succeeded.  But we don't know what happened, we know what Tina wanted
Al to think had happened.  We have plenty of evidence that Al has
cheated on Tina, but no real information on whether Tina has cheated on
Al.
--
Mary Anne Espenshade
ARPA: mae@aplpy.jhuapl.edu
UUCP: ...!allegra!mimsy!aplcen!aplpy!mae
From: jp776@macbeth.umd.edu (Robert S. Rodgers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Time Trax
Date: 24 Jan 93 22:03:35 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <1993Jan24.082437.5878@pro-smof.cts.com> wixer!cactus.org!wixer!pro-smof.cts.com!rfletcher@cactus.org (Robert Fletcher) writes:
>
>  Time Trax, the dumest show on TV. 


	Amazing.

	Truly, amazing.

	


Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: finifter@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Tracy E. Finifter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: QL: Dr Ruth continuity error
Keywords: glasses
Date: 28 Jan 93 06:51:56 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.sf.tv
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

acb@cory.Berkeley.EDU (aka Angelo Muscat) writes:

>In article <1jnrgrINNrp1@mozz.unh.edu> mre@kepler.unh.edu (MikE '93) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan21.211356.15072@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> krk1@pyuxe.uucp (24228-knights) writes:
>>>glasses.  SO, just as the leapees always leap into the fermi suit,
>>>they also leap into anything else the previous leapee might have added.

>I wonder how painful it was for Sam to leap into the braces worn by
>"The Kamikazi Kid" ........

>"Ouchhhh boy !!"

>-- Alex

This brings up an inconsistency in Camikaze Kid:

When Sam leaps in, he's not wearing his braces, but he sees them in his
reflection.  As inanimate objects, braces don't leap, thus they would have
remained on Sam when he leaped in.  Chalk one up to first season heebie-
jeebies.

-- 
* Tracy E. Finifter                     * My .sig's stuck in 1956 with a     *
*  finifter@gandalf.rutgers.edu         * brain like swiss cheese and I'm    *
*  Douglass College, Rutgers University * experiencing technical             *
*  New Brunswick, New Jersey            * difficulties in retrieving it.     *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: amd@space.mit.edu (Ann M. Davis)
Subject: Re: Time Trax
Organization: MIT Center for Space Research
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:11:42 GMT

>, mmcalees@cs16.UVic.CA (Michael McAleese) writes:
|>    After viewing the two hour debut movie of Time Trax, I have to give
|> it the old thumbs down. It wasn't exactly that it was bad... it just 
|> wasn't good.


Actually I loved it.  You can't build a story on SPFX alone.  The SF
elements created a solid atmosphere and background for the story. I liked
the acting and the actors.  I thought it was very well done.

Points I got a kick out of:
SPOILERS



The Pentagon as a prison.  I found this very believable.

The modern version of peepholes for doors.

Selma's disguise as a credit card



Anyway, does anyone know if/when this will be a series?

	Ann
-- 

Ann M. Davis
amd@space.mit.edu			 "Choose your battles wisely"
MIT Center for Space Research
From: ASATTERW@UCS.INDIANA.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: RE: SF-LOVERS Digest   V18 #50
Date: 25 Jan 93 18:57:48 GMT

HELP!!  I want off of this listserve, and I'm having no luck at all...
From: wixer!cactus.org!wixer!pro-smof.cts.com!rfletcher@cactus.org (Robert Fletcher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: New shows
Date: 25 Jan 1993 21:25:00 -0600
Organization: The SMOF-BBS: Science Fiction Online Since 1985 [512-467-7317]
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

  Has anyone heard of a new show that has the main characters jumping to
different dimension, different Earths, if you will.
----
ProLine:  rfletcher@pro-smof
Internet: rfletcher@pro-smof.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher
ARPA:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher@nosc.mil
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL question (Insignificant SPOILER on Dr. Ruth episode)
From: <RHK106@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 08:32:51 EST
Organization: Penn State University

I want to know how the hell did Dr. Ruth's body (albiet with Sam's mind)
take a couple of hammers to the jaw and real nasty shove into some kitchen
applience by some guy who looks to be about 6'0", 180 lbs and then come back
and kick his ass?

Martial arts or no martial arts, I don't think an old woman can brush off
that kind of punishment.

Needless to say, I was laughing my head off when I was watching the
climactic fight scene!  Heh hah!
From: doc@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Jeffrey Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Galactica on Sci-Fi channel - what happened?
Date: 27 Jan 93 04:32:46 GMT
Organization: NCSU

SCI-FI only runs a full series once at the 8:00, 12:00 time frame.
Monday night was the last BattleStar Galactica ep. "The Hand of God"
I was hoping that they would show Galactica '80 but I guess not.
Buck Rogers was on before they started BG so it seems that after they
finish the run of Buck that they will go back to Galactica.

L8er,
Jeff 
**PS/2 + OS/2 = Infinity**                          Jeffrey Smith
                                                     -<KD4AYH>-
                                                  doc@catt.ncsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: roy@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Time Trax
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 12:55:59 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.16 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: roy@trigger.watson.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In <1993Jan22.080641.15530@uhura.neoucom.edu> wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu (William R. Cruce) writes:
>
>I find it difficult to believe that in 2193 (or whenever) people
>who want to read 1993 newspapers will be allowed to check out yellowed
>old actual PAPER copies.  Most libraries now keep old periodicals on
>microfilm or microfiche.  Surely in a world with credit card sized
>computers there will be a better way to read old newspapers...
>
>
>-- 
>Unauthorized duplication, etc. may result in civil liability, criminal pro-
>secution, the wrath of the tall man or a bite from Ralph the Wonder Llama.
>     William L.R. (Bill) Cruce       INTERNET: wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu 
>   Neurobiology Dept, NE Ohio U Coll of Med, POB 95, Rootstown, OH 44272 


Maybe due to some time paradox thingy, you need the actual paper printed
the actual day the news was created, and not some reproduced facsimile.
Just a guess.  It don't make sense.  It was obviously a writers oversite.
However, in Washington DC, I would bet that 200 year old papers would
exist along with micro-fiche, or some other storage technology.

Also, who gives a crap?  My pet peeve is people who watch scifi shows
looking for low tech inconsistencies.  The show was still very enjoyable
with this very small oversight.  Do you feel superior now that you
have pointed out this error?

Regards,
Tom Rogers
roy@trigger.watson.ibm.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Disclaimer:  The comments in this post  | - What is your name?     |
|              are not necessarily shared | - What is your quest?    |
|              with my employer           | - What is...             |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: morpheus@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Morpheus Nosferatu)
Subject: Re: last episode of Galactica
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 15:43:44 GMT

In article <93027.022038PB5329A@auvm.american.edu> Patrick Barton <PB5329A@auvm.american.edu> writes:
>Could anyone give me a brief plot description of the last regular episode
>of Battlestar Galactica?  Did this involve Earth at all?  I mean the
>regular series, not the Galactica '80...I was just wondering how they
>resolved the original series....thanks....
>
>always a Galactica fan....patrick
>
>"If it wasn't for disappointment, I wouldn't have any appointments..." TMBG


Here is someone else's post on what was supposed to be the ending of BG.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

|> >	Does anyone out there know how the televison series Battlestar
|> >Galactica ended?  Did they reach Earth?
|> 
|> The entire (short-lived) last season of BG took place on Earth in the
|> present day.  They even renamed the series to something like "Galactica
|> 1980" (where the year was actually the year it was on).  Those of us who
|> thought that the show couldn't get any worse learned we were wrong.

Actually, Glen Larson had planned a final episode for the series (this is
old information from when I visited the studio back in the mid 80's).

From what I heard, Larson and company were totally pissed at the studio for
cancelling the series and planning to change it into the "Galactica 1980"
garbage.  They rushed through four days of shooting with the cast before the
powers that be pulled the plug on them.  I understand that the script and
raw footage exist (at least it did back then), but that it would take a lot
of work to finish it into an episode (editing, effects, etc...).

I only heard rumors about this final story, but it was supposed to be VERY
*FINAL*.  Larson was going to make certain that nobody would abuse his
child in the future.  The rumors had it that the they did reach Earth, but
something was strange.  It didn't take place in 1980, but in the far future.
Remember two hints dropped during the series:  a.) Earthlings had been seen
in star ships (that old prison planet had captured one).  b.) Those aliens
told them that they would be "safe" on Earth (ominous sounding to me).

Those that liked the series should just ignore the "Galactica 1980" stuff.
Larson hated it, and tried to stop it, but the studio won in the end.

Tim
tucker@smsc.sony.com

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

/-----------------------------------------+------------------------------\
| Jeff Standish, Dreamwalker, and        |  morpheus@sage.cc.purdue.edu  |
| Morpheus Nosaferatu, The Dream Vampyre | standish@mentor.cc.purdue.edu |
| Too many minds trapped in one body.    |     Reality is for those      |
| And it would be a human one, at that.  |   who can't handle fantasy.   |
\----------------------------------------+-------------------------------/
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: dss2k@Virginia.EDU ("David Strauss")
Subject: Re: Babylon 5 - Brief Description wanted...
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 15:13:26 GMT

The BEST place to pick up info, BTW, is on GEnie.  All the
compilation files that exist are from Joe Straczynski's posts
on the Science Fiction RoundTable on GEnie.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: mae@aplpy.jhuapl.edu (Mary Anne Espenshade)
Subject: Re: QL: Two-Faced Reviews: Dr. Ruth
Organization: Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 93 22:06:03 GMT

Possible spoilers for the Dr. Ruth episode of Quantum Leap.

I LOVED THIS EPISODE - I was in stiches almost the whole time.  It was
comic relief.  For the people bent out of shape that this was in some
way political - it went right past me (and probably a lot of the less
attentive audience), until someone pointed out the background kiss with
history, hardly the main point of the episode.

Sam's answers to the questions for Dr. Ruth were wonderful.  All the
scenes with Al and Dr. Ruth in the waiting room were fun, though I'm
sure all of us had diagnosed Al's problem long ago.  I am kind of
surprised this made it into the 8pm time slot with no problems, this
was such a vocabulary expanding episode. :-)

billones@grebyn.com (Jeremy Billones) writes:
> - Tina loves Gooshie, even married him in an alternate time line, and
>we're supposed to cheer when Al says he loves her.

We do NOT really have any proof (I don't consider snide remarks from
Ziggy proof of anything :-) ) that Tina has ever been involved with
Gooshie, just that they were married in a radically different time-line
in which Al didn't even exist. Hardly enough to base a judgement of the
episode on.

> - Once again we have a one-sided villain who's so dumb he attacks the
>girl in her own apartment, but so smart he steals a match out of her
>wastebasket.  And his wife knows?  As if.

Of course the nozzle (I've forgotten his name) didn't steal the match.
Annie did forget to light the stove because she was so upset.  This was
to mis-direct the audience to think that maybe the guy's version of what
was happening was true.  As for whether his wife knows, in case you
didn't catch on, the guy was lying through his teeth.
--
Mary Anne Espenshade
ARPA: mae@aplpy.jhuapl.edu
UUCP: ...!allegra!mimsy!aplcen!aplpy!mae
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: mmcalees@cs16.UVic.CA (Michael McAleese)
Subject: Re: Star Trek spinoffs
Organization: Those Dudes
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 93 01:00:53 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.201257.17622@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu> lizb@banyan.com writes:
>Someone here at work told me she read an article a number of months ago that
>said there were *two* spinoffs of Star Trek coming this season.  DS9 is the
>obvious one; her memory is that Space Rangers was supposed to be the other.
>This seems unlikely to me; but has anyone heard anything to substantiate
>this?

  Space Rangers is the illegitimate child of The Original Star Trek, not a
spinoff.

  Star Trek:The Next Generation and Star Trek:Deep Space 9 are the only two
Star Trek spinoffs currently in production, but I'd like to start a hot and
juicy unsubstantiated rumor that Star Trek:Red Dwarf is in the final planning
stages. Once they figure out how to show Rimmer and Lister as supportive 
friends rather than bickering foes while still retaining that edge of comedy
the series will be a go. While I'm at it, what about Star Trek:Cops in Space?
It can be a hard, gritty series about Federation police who have to deal with
problems such as friendly disagreements, misunderstandings, and the excesses
of wealth and happiness.

Spoiler Joke from Space Rangers episode #3 follows:

(Speaking about the alien lizard race)
Boon: What kind of weapons they use?
Baker: In war, anything goes. In personal matters, it's always Tuco.
Boon: Tuco?
Baker: Tuco.
Boon: Is that Yiddish?
Baker: No, that's tukis.
Boon: Hmm. Sounds Yiddish.

-- 
*     mmcalees@csr.uvic.ca (Michael McAleese) : I speak only for me...       *
  "Man can believe the impossible, but never the improbable." - Oscar Wilde
  (For snooping governments: heroin, cocaine, FBI, CSIS, CIA, albatross...)
From: wixer!cactus.org!wixer!pro-smof.cts.com!rfletcher@cactus.org (Robert Fletcher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: New shows
Date: 27 Jan 1993 10:15:03 -0600
Organization: The SMOF-BBS: Science Fiction Online Since 1985 [512-467-7317]
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

  That is it, "Doorways." I saw that concept in a comic book about a year
ago, jumping to different Earths. Interesting how so many comics are being
turned into shows.
----
ProLine:  rfletcher@pro-smof
Internet: rfletcher@pro-smof.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher
ARPA:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher@nosc.mil
From: jsfjp@acad1.alaska.edu (PERRICONE FRANK J)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Re: QL: The Handlink
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:45:00 GMT
Organization: University of Alaska - Fairbanks
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41.UAC

>What happened to the hand link in the Leap Back?  Since Al had the hand link
>in the past, it wouldn't work, but it was still there.  What if someone
>found it ala Terminator?

I kept shouting at the TV, "destroy the handlink", too.... but 1995-1999
technology is probably not THAT far ahead and wouldn't cause anything too
serious.  Plus, QL is avoiding the butterfly effect, by and large.

In "Future Boy" one side effect of Sam's presence is that young Sam back in Elk
Ridge got to hear Moe's theory of time travel, which he in turn got from old
Sam.  But old Sam had thought of it first...  
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
From: acb@cory.Berkeley.EDU (aka Angelo Muscat)
Subject: Re: QL: Dr Ruth continuity error
Keywords: glasses
Organization: University of California, at Berkeley
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 04:43:31 GMT

In article <1jnrgrINNrp1@mozz.unh.edu> mre@kepler.unh.edu (MikE '93) writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.211356.15072@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> krk1@pyuxe.uucp (24228-knights) writes:
>>glasses.  SO, just as the leapees always leap into the fermi suit,
>>they also leap into anything else the previous leapee might have added.

I wonder how painful it was for Sam to leap into the braces worn by
"The Kamikazi Kid" ........

"Ouchhhh boy !!"

-- Alex
From: lau@sunset.ai.sri.com (Stephen Lau)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL: Dr Ruth continuity error
Date: 21 Jan 93 23:00:50 GMT
Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park, CA
In-reply-to: dak@gandalf.rutgers.edu's message of 21 Jan 93 20:06:32 GMT


Spoilers, but not really....




When the Vampire leapt in, he removed the same glasses that Dr. Ruth
had on. They weren't "his" glasses from the past.


Steve

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Lau                 lau@ai.sri.com| 
SRI International                         | "Frosted milk with cereal and juice
333 Ravenswood Ave., Menlo Park, CA. 94025|  forms a complete breakfast!"
(415) 859-2925              (415) 326-6200|            - Ren & Stimpy     
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: dickson@micro.caltech.edu (Jeff Dickson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Time Trax
Date: 23 Jan 93 21:54:12 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: celaeno.micro.caltech.edu

mmcalees@cs16.UVic.CA (Michael McAleese) writes:

>   After viewing the two hour debut movie of Time Trax, I have to give
>it the old thumbs down. It wasn't exactly that it was bad... it just 
>wasn't good.


I have to agree.  It struck me like a Knight Rider without wheels.
From: william.johnson@um.cc.umich.edu (William Johnson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: TimeTraxx
Followup-To: rec.arts.sf.tv
Date: 25 Jan 1993 21:29:41 GMT
Organization: The Univerisity of Michigan
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: tibia.engin.umich.edu

A friend of mine came up with an interesting thought about TimeTraxx
or Timedrek depending on how one looks at it.  If the action is taking
place in an alternate universe, then how are the characters communicating
with the future through newspaper ads?  Also my own thought on the matter,
how do the people get sent back to the correct universe?
From: mre@kepler.unh.edu (MikE '93)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL: This season not bad...
Date: 23 Jan 1993 00:44:35 GMT
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
NNTP-Posting-Host: kepler.unh.edu
Keywords: QL

In article <C19EwE.4u5@ucunix.san.uc.edu> jonesek@ucunix.san.uc.edu (Erik Reid Jones) writes:
>Here's how I'd place this season's episodes, into three
>categories:

Let me try this.

>EXCELLENT                  AVERAGE               POOR
>______________________________________________________
Lee Harvey Oswald
Killin' Time
Starlight, Starbright
Deliver Us From Evil
Trilogy I
Trilogy II
			Trilogy III
Tale of 2 Sweeties
			Liberation
Dr. Ruth

>WHY:
>Lee Harvey Oswald -
	Edge of your seat excitement, drama, and suspense.

>The Leaping of the Shrew -
	Havn't seen it.

>Starlight, Starbright - 
	Wee bit of a let-down from what I expected, but not enough
to drop down to AVG.

>Nowhere to Run -
	Havn't seen it, either.

>Trilogy - Some of the best QL I have ever seen
Agreed, but T III was a bit of a let-down.  (Maybe 'cause I saw it right
after T II)

>Promised Land - Solid episode, but not one to rave over
	Havn't seen this one.  My parents didn't record it for me.  :(

>Dr. Ruth - Had me in stitches, even if I didn't like the Annie subplot
Ditto.  The subplot with "Sam"'s coworkers would have been fine by itself.
(The Annie subplot made the episode less light)  But of course, Sam had to
have something to do, right?  Oh, well.  Still great stuff.

>Killin' Time - My favorite this season, edge of the seat time
Yes!  Anybody know when it'll be on again?

>Deliver Us From Evil -
Classic QL (i.e. 'normal' or 'regular')...until Sam and Alia touched.

>A Tale of Two Sweeties - A failed slapstick episode
Hey, I liked it.  It was great to see Sam running around between 2 families 
like that.

>Liberation - I expect much better from Deborah Pratt
Yah, this could have been better.

>season is way below par, I think this shows that we are still
>seeing some really good QL here.
I agree wholeheartedly.
--MikE...Ad for Blood Moon:  "I want to bite your remote control!"

-- 
Can he bend? Listen bud                 |Mike Escutia	MikE@unh.edu
He's got radioactive blood...		|Pliable Lad of the LNH
To him, life is just one big Play-doh,	|Read Alt.Comics.LNH!
Whenever there's a parody,		|Follow the adventures of
You'll find Pliable Laaaaaaaaaaaaad.	|	The Net.Patrol!
	--Douglas P. Wojtowicz (fomerly Lost Cause Boy of the LNH)
From: grj@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Gary R. Jackson)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:14:06 GMT
Subject: Re: QL question (Insignificant SPOILER on Dr. Ruth episode)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA