HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dsohl@spock.uucp (Daniel Sohl)
Subject: Re: Picard/Riker '96 (was Re: Wesley Crusher is returning???)
Organization: Choate Rosemary Hall
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 20:21:13 GMT

>>And Spock, as the offspring of
>>an American citizen, is a _natural-born_ US citizen, eligible for the
>>office of President or Vice-President once he reached the appropriate age.
>>
>Sorry, for the office of President, the person must not only be an American
>citizen, but born in the United States.  This is the only office that has
>such a constitutional stipulation.  I remember this because there was some
>question when I was a military dependant overseas that if a US dependent
>was born while their military parents were in a foreign country, would that
>person be eligible for prez?  There is currently no definitive answer since
>there has not yet been a precedent.

Sorry, but for the office of president, the person does not have to be
born in the US. He or she simply has to have been a citizen from birth...
that applies to country OR blood. If either of your parents are US citizens,
you are a native-born American and can potentially become president sometime
during your lifetime, so long as you do not, at any point, become a citizen
of another country.
-- 
"Life is like a grapefruit."     *                       -- Dan Sohl
"Er, how so?"                    *****************************************
"Well, it's sort of orangy-yellow on the outside, pink and squidgy on the*
 inside. Oh, yeah, and some people have half a one for breakfast."       *
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.current:20260 rec.arts.startrek.misc:12520
From: hdnea@usho92.hou281.chevron.com (David Neal)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Have A Christmas Tree
Date: 11 Dec 92 22:10:47 GMT
Organization: Chevron

In article <1992Dec05.094836.13670@uumeme.chi.il.us> rwmech@uumeme.chi.il.us (Robert W. Mech) writes:
>>>|> carasso@Turing.ORG (Roger Carasso) writes: (in this news group for some 
>>>|> reason):
>>>|> 
>>>|> >	      PLEASE DO NOT KILL A TREE FOR CHRISTMAS!!!
>>>|> >		THE WORLD NEEDS ALL THE TREES IT HAS.
>>>|> >		 GET A LIVING TREE AND KEEP IT ALIVE.
>>>|> 
>
>Ive seen enough replys about this already.  The point is the original poster
>wants to save a tree, or more to the point, save the environment.  I think


PLEASE NO MORE FOLLOWUPS.

THIS AND MANY MESSAGES LIKE IT ARE STARVING FROM A LACK OF
ELECTRONS. THERE JUST AREN'T ENOUGH OF THEM LITTLE BUGGERS
TO GO AROUND. PLEASE HELP TODAY. CHARGE SALLY STRUTHERS
WITH A GIGA VOLT.

NEXT TIME *YOU* POST, PLEASE THINK OF ALL THE STARVING 
EFINDITRONIC SUB SPACE FIELDS THAT _HAVE_NO_ELECTRONS!



-- 
David Neal -- hdnea@hou281.chevron.com 

My processes aren't dead! They're only resource impaired!
Computationally challenged!
From: ssubrama@dante.nmsu.edu (SUBRAMANIAM)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: A Good Captain
Date: 20 Dec 92 18:21:07 GMT
Organization: New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM

In article <cboerm48.724314995@ursa> cboerm48@ursa.calvin.edu (Christopher Boerma) writes:
>
>>>I think an interesting story would have Data offered a ship.
>
>>I really don't see this as very likely, a captain must exercise human
>>emotion/intuition etc. in his decisions, while Data can compute with the best
>>of them and is coming around in the humanity department, he is not ready for a
>
>Hmmm, I'd have to disagree. I think Data is more than great for the job.
>I feel that emotions tend to get in the way of clear logically thinking 
>more than help to solve a problem... I mean do you want to argue with an
>angry person? or someone who's calm and logical? How often is someone
>"blinded by love"? And Data does have the intuition... look at the way he
>defeated the Romulans in the Klingon episode. I think Data'd make a very
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What episode it this?

Siva
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: analog@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Mike Monahan)
Subject: What do you mean the new Capt. is mean??? (Spoilers)
Keywords: Get a life.
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 07:58:56 GMT

In article <BzADDt.Lw7@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens) writes:
>Out of all the obviously mean orders the new capt.  
>has given, this is the only one I wished had been given on the first  
>episode. (referring to the Capt.'s order to Troi)


	Obviously mean.  Like actually making LaForge work, or Riker alter
his precious duty roster?  Come on, he's actually turning the big E into
the ass kicking warship that it should have been in the first place.
Just because Jelico doesn't sit down with every whining crew member (like
Troi) and listen to their side before he tells them that they're wrong and
he's right, doesn't make him a jerk.  



	The Analog Person-(Michael J. Monahan) analog@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
	Suffering is the origin of conciousness-Dostoyevsky
	We will pay the price, but we will not count the cost-Neil Peart
        There is nothing an agnostic can't do if he doesn't know
            whether he believes in it or not.- Graham Chapman 
>-- Jeff (jeffo@uiuc.edu)
>-- NeXTmail welcome
From: schouten@sp95.csrd.uiuc.edu (Dale Schouten)
Subject: Re: What do you mean the new Capt. is mean??? (Spoilers)
Organization: Center for Supercomputing R & D
	<1992Dec15.163520.14372@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: 15 Dec 92 13:12:31

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIIGHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
SPOILERS!!!!!!!
RUN AWAY! RUN AWAY!












In article <1992Dec15.163520.14372@en.ecn.purdue.edu> rupley@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Jeff Rupley) writes:
> 
>   I find it very unlikely that Geordi hasnt optimized the shields by now, and
> it would be even more unlikely that a new Captain (in command, not
> engineering), would be needed to point it out to him. Also for the work
> part of it, the initial discussion said that the Engr dept. could barely
> get the work done, later in the episode Geordi said 1/3 of engr had been
> transfered to security, of course he's gonna have problems getting the work
> done now.
But you're forgetting, it's not just optimizing the efficiency, it's
taking away from several research oriented labs, which he would not do
under normal circumstances, but which Jelly Co. wants done in
preparation for some serious warlike activities.  As for time
constraints, Data said it could be done.  Nufsaid.

Dale schouten@uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: amc@wucs1.wustl.edu (Adam Costello)
Subject: Re: Chain of Command - This week?
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 07:40:40 GMT

In article <1geimlINN7h@bigboote.WPI.EDU> firenza@wpi.WPI.EDU (Timothy Mark Collins) writes:

> YES!!!!!!!
>
> I taped STTNG this week for the sole purpose of seeing the trailer for next
>week.  IT WAS CHAIN OF COMMAND!   
>  Set those VCR's today...

Geez, be careful, you about gave me a heart attack!  When I read
"IT WAS CHAIN OF COMMAND" I thought you meant that tonight's
episode, which I didn't watch because it was supposed to be a
re-run, had actually been CoC.  A few seconds after I digested
"Set those VCR's today" I started breathing again.

Thanks for the confirmation, though!

AMC
From: aa396@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bill Henley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: New Paramount boss cans ST VII?
Date: 18 Dec 1992 02:30:07 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: thor.ins.cwru.edu


STAR TREK VII may be a casualty of the change of command at
Paramount; Dixie Owen's news column in the ST fanzine STARLINK
reports that Sherry Lansing, the new Paramount movie head 
replacing Brandon Tartikoff, has her own projects in mind and
they don't include another TREK film.

(This may be just as well, IMHO, if there's any truth to the
rumor that William Shatner was pushing a script which virtually
wrote out the whole Original Trek cast other than himself...)

-- 
Bill Henley, Assistant Sysop, Cleveland Free-Net Science Fiction
& Fantasy SIG (aa396)
From: aa396@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bill Henley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: GOD THING book cancelled
Date: 18 Dec 1992 02:26:07 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: thor.ins.cwru.edu


If anyone has been waiting with bated breath for the publication
of THE GOD THING (a Star Trek novel started years ago by Gene
Roddenberry and finished by Michael Jan Friedman), note that
Pocket Books has cancelled publication of the hardcover book,
according to a news item published in LOCUS and reprinted in
the ST fanzine STARLINK.  Reported reason: the Roddenberry
estate had objections to publication of the book.

-- 
Bill Henley, Assistant Sysop, Cleveland Free-Net Science Fiction
& Fantasy SIG (aa396)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: labmas@stein.u.washington.edu (Michael Andersson)
Subject: Re: DS9
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:10:29 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.044040.23875@nwnexus.WA.COM> zakons@halcyon.com (Scott Allan Zakon) writes:

>After several calls to KCPQ(Fox13) in Seattle/Tacoma that were answered
>by an exceptionally bored secretary, I have only a confirmation that DS9
>will start during the week of Jan 3-9.  No definite air times yet. I'll
>keep pestering them until I get a real answer.
>Scott Allan Zakon             zakons@halcyon.com

I've spoken to the Programming dept at KCPQ, and DS9 will premier (2-hr
movie) on Monday, January 4 at 8:00 pm, and regular episodes will air
starting Saturday, January 16 at 6:00 pm.

Their regular Saturday lineup will be TOS @ 5:00pm, DS9 @ 6:00pm, TNG @
7:00pm.  (Tentatively)
From: judy.ranelli@the-matrix.com (Judy Ranelli) 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: DEEP SPACE 9 == WHERE
Date: 15 Dec 92 12:16:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The MATRIX BBS - Birmingham, AL - 205-323-2016
Reply-To: judy.ranelli@the-matrix.com (Judy Ranelli) 

-> *sigh* One more to add..Deep Space 9 will air on Omaha on KPTM/FOX
-> 42. This has been know for over 6 months.  It was in the Omaha World
-> Herald way back in June of this year.

I also heard that Babylon 5 is going to be a TV movie special or
similar, with the actual series put off until 94.  Which gives DS9 quite
a jump on things.

However, here in B'ham both shows are going to be on the same Fox
affiliate.

Strange since they are clearly in competition.
                                              
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: warn@newton.uvm.edu (Patrick D Warn)
Subject: DS9 in VT/NH/Upstate NY
Organization: University of Vermont -- Division of EMBA Computer Facility
Distribution: default
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 20:03:24 GMT

I just found out the times for DS9 on WNNE in White River Jct, VT and 
WPTZ in Burlinton, VT / Plattsburg, NY.  The two hour pilot will be
shown on January 8th at 8pm. The series starts in its regular time the 
next week on Thursday January 14th from 8 to 9pm. 


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: plutnj@aix.rpi.edu (James Matthew Plutnicki)
Subject: Re: STVI Continuity error ?
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 16:33:48 GMT

In article <921216.151352@ia.ph.bham.ac.uk> HR-5@ia.ph.bham.ac.uk (Connor MacLeod (of the Clan MacLeod)) writes:
>I'm sure somebody must have already mentioned this, but in Star Trek VI,
>the cloaked bird of prey is defeated by a gas-seeking torpedo - Lt Uhuru
>having suggested the use of 'the equipment we're carrying to chart
>gaseous planetary anomolies' - How is it, then, that at the beginning
>of the film, it is the Excelsior which is carrying this equipment, not
>the Enterprise - in fact, the Enterprise is in space dock when Kirk et
>al. first set off - thus (presumably) it has not got this equipment on
>board ??

If you want to call the book canon, then there is an explanation.  In the book,
Starfleet was sending all Starfleet ships out to catalog gaseous space anomalies
This includes the Enterprise before coming in for shorleave.  When they went
back out early to meet with Chang's ship, the equipment was still aboard.

If you don't want the the book to be canon, then chalk it up to the writers and
a momentary lapse of good judgement...


-- 
 * James M. Plutnicki (plutnj@rpi.edu) * "There are no truths, only facts  *
 * Computer Systems Engineering Major  * blurred by opinion."   --Me       *
 * Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    * "Confucius say,'Virginity like    * 
 * OS/2 advocate and user...:)         * balloon one prick all gone'."     *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: REFRESH
From: batgar@vax1.mankato.msus.edu
Date: 18 Dec 92 20:21:21 -0600
Organization: Mankato State University

I think the only way to do Star Trek VII Is to have some wscenario where the
original crew is ABSOUTELY needed..... I have a suggestion for this, I will
probably be flamed off the newsgroup but here goes......
     
      Ta Da.... THE RETURN OF V'GER !
 You know that Big thing that Sucked up Captain Decker and the Bald Lady...
Maybe just the return of them to earth.
  Something like that.
   
--------------------------------------------------------
Dan "Batgar" Edgar     "If I am insane then even I don't know it" -me
Batgar@vax1.mankato.msus.edu
From: cstone@husc8.harvard.edu (christopher stone)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Female CO for the E  II
Date: 18 Dec 92 04:01:34 GMT
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

In article <1992Dec17.225700.499@fsl.noaa.gov> jkl@fsl.noaa.gov (Jennifer Longstaff) writes:
>christopher stone (cstone@husc8.harvard.edu) wrote:
>: As I interpret your argument, it would not be profitable for Paramount
>: to have a female captain, since 20th cen. TV viewers wouldn't accept
>: it.  I must disagree here.  First, television can *change* people's
>: opinions about the "macho image," much as TOS did in the 60's about
>: a lot of social issues and "Cagney and Lacey" did a few years ago
>: with regard to female detectives.  
>: Chris
>
>I agree that showing *competent* women in leadership roles in ST will
>work, and will change peoples' role model images.  However, tell me if
>I'm paranoid, but it seems to me that Paramount has done more to hurt
>people's impressions of women in leadership positions.  Just off the top 
>of my head, I recall two instances where women were shown in very 
>authoritative positions, and later in the show those women were shown to 
>be real ding-dongs.  I'm thinking of:
>    (1) Admiral Satie, in "the drumhead."  She was an *ADMIRAL*, highly
>respected, etc. etc.  But after a go-round with Picard she was "exposed
>for the paranoid dingbat she really was..."
>    (2) Dr. Kyla Marr, in the episode where the Crystalline Entity was
>destroyed.  She was originally a very intelligent women (other than
>her prejudice against Data), but as the show wore on she exhibited more
>and more signs of mental breakdown due to her guilt about losing her son.
>
>In both of the previous episodes, these women were also older (gray
>hair, probably in their 60's).  I hope we're not also trying to be
>ageist.
>
>And I can think of more examples where women were not shown in a real
>flattering light; how about "The Perfect Mate" where the woman's only
>reason for existence was to please men?!  Even in "The Game", Robin
>Leffler was originally smart and independent, but of course late in the
>show she had to succumb to the Game so that Wesley could save the ship
>by himself....
>
>I know there have also been plenty of men shown as idiots on the show, but
>I'm trying to remember when a woman was portrayed as *REALLY SMART* or
>competent or a good female role model.  Can anyone help me with this?

Oops, I left out an example from one of my favorite episodes,
"Who Watches the Watchers?" -- Nuria.
Chris
From: galsci!cmckeithan
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Is this newsgroup working?  Hello?
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 11:37:09 EST
Reply-To: iccdev!galsci!cmckeithan
Organization: Galaxy Scientific Corp.

Good question.  Can you read this? :-)
But seriously, folks, people here have also complained that we are not
reaching the net.  Could someone respond if you see this?  Thanks!

Clifford M. Mckeithan Jr              emory!iccdev!galsci!cmckeithan
Galaxy Scientific Corp.               High Quality Engineering
Opinions expressed do not neccesarily reflect those of my employer.
From: jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Ah HA! (Or why do federation phasers always hit their target)
Date: 15 Dec 92 06:31:33 GMT
Reply-To: jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

COLIN MA writes
> Well, it's not true that Federation people never miss with their
> phasers.

And with so many people able to dodge something that is heading their  
way at light speed (as so many people duck phaser shots on ST:TNG),  
it's no wonder that someone misses.
-- 
-- Jeff (jeffo@uiuc.edu)
-- NeXTmail welcome
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: kogoma@vesta.unm.edu (Taki Kogoma)
Subject: Re: Why all the repeats? Is TNG getting Cancelled?
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 04:35:23 GMT
Organization: Nit-Pickers for a Better Tomorow Afternoon
Distribution: na

In article <rawdon.724298914@cs.wisc.edu> rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu writes:
>Is it just me, or does it seem like hardly anyone pays any attention to this
>stuff?

Yes.  It's just you, and nobody pays attention to this stuff. ;-)


-- 
Capt. Gym Z. Quirk  (Known to some as Taki Kogoma)  kogoma@vesta.unm.edu
 I'll get a life when someone demonstrates that it would be superior to
                          what I have now...
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: chil@fraser.sfu.ca (Keith Lim)
Subject: Re: Troi blown! Jelico cool! Spot DSN? READ!!!
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 10:27:06 GMT

00jlrushton@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:

>Spoiler:
>Spot the cat goes to Deep Space Nine as the official mascot!!!
>He is Lt. Commander of the Cat Forces!
>Yes its True!

Now wait a minute! This isn't what I heard. As far as I know, the DS9 bible
says that Ensign Toonces will be promoted to Lieutenant, and act as the
de facto head of the feline squad. Spot wasn't supposed to leave the original
show. Has there been a change? The setup for Toonces's transfer was his
unorthodox decisions while at the helm (to be seen in Chain of Command II),
and this is the case as far as I know.

-- 
Keith_Lim@sfu.ca   Simon Fraser University, Burnaby B.C., V5A 1S6, Canada
** Hon Cog Sci  Min Psyc  Senate  URC  FARSIDE  LEAD  CCCS  COCP  PSU  **
These opinions are mine. Mine!! ALL MINE!! No one else's! NO ONE ELSE'S!!

"Kitchen utensils and vegetables! Yesssss!!" --"S.S.", on the new Purity Test
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
Subject: Re: A Good Captain
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 23:25:00 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1992Dec13.100634.25440@Virginia.EDU> qtm2w@Virginia.EDU ("Quinn T. McCord") writes:

>	Perhaps Riker WOULD make a good captain, but let's
>consider this:  the Enterprise is often being referred to as
>the "flagship of the Federation" (whatever THAT is), and is
>certainly Starfleet's most powerful vessel.  Regardless of how
>good ANY first officer is, would he really be given the
>Enterprise as his FIRST command.  I doubt it.

Perhaps your memory is failing you, then.  Riker *was* given
command of the Enterprise, in Best of Both Worlds.  Not "temporary
command," either -- no one expected to get Picard back at that point.



Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: vincent@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Victor W. Wong)
Subject: Re: Where are the Yeomans?
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC.
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 15:41:34 EST

Where are the Yeomen in TNG? Probably made obsolete.
You must remember that in our navy, "yeoman" refers to the petty
officer in charge of message traffic.  In TNG, the position evolved
to that of secretary or administrative assistant.  Thus, "yeoman" is
not a rank, but a position reserved for the enlisted ranks.
We clearly see that by the time of the movies, there is no longer a
need for an administrative assistant for the captain.  Such duties
appear to have devolved to the communications officer.
Furthermore, by the time of TNG the post of communications officer 
has been further subsumed into the post of chief security officer.
(Which is why Worf does on TNG what Uhura did on TOS.)
======================================================================
                            VICTOR WONG
                     vincent@micor.ocunix.on.ca
----------------------------------------------------------------------
            "Closed minds lead short lives."--Anonymous
======================================================================

Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.current:20566 ne.general:3469
From: James_J_Kowalczyk@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,ne.general
Subject: Re: DS9 in boston area?
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 22:21:59 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

bbs.lar@tsoft.net (Larry Greenfield) writes:
>Heh heh, we get it before you do. *niko*
>  L.A. gets Deep Space Nine Jan. 5th for the 2-hr premiere, channel 13, 
>KCOP
>:::::Larry:::::
>
>--
>Larry Greenfield (bbs.lar@tsoft.net)

For the New England readers...

I think I saw an ad on WWOR (on cable) that they will be showing
Deep Space Nine, but I don't recall when the premiere will be shown.

Jim Kowalczyk                    James_J_Kowalczyk@cup.portal.com
Andover, MA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: brewster@sscvx1.ssc.gov
Subject: Re: Dr. Crusher wherabouts - Season II
Organization: Superconducting Super Collider Laboratory
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:32:55 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.130907.26823@walter.cray.com>, tdt@thor.cray.com (Thomas Torkelson  {66580 CF/DEV}) writes:
> 
> Key> Hi All!
> 

Actually, I had heard that the writers had decided that Dr. Crusher was not
Dr.Bones like, and decided to replace her.  She was good humored, attractive
and did not mind being scattered across the universe in a transporter. The
picked up Dr. ??? for a year, but soon ran into trouble with us the audience,
who happened to like Doc Crusher.  They then brought her back.  Just a Tidbit?



> 
> Anxiously waiting for CoC II and DSN.
> 
> Tom T.
> 		           _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/         _/    _/    _/
> Thomas D. Torkelson       _/    _/  _/    _/      _/_/    _/  _/
>    tdt@cray.com		 _/        _/  _/       _/  _/    _/_/
> Chippewa Falls, WI      _/        _/_/        _/_/_/_/    _/
>   (715) 726-6580       _/    _/  _/  _/     _/      _/   _/
> 		      _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/        _/  _/
> 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: spectre@nmt.edu (Spectre)
Subject: Re: Picard/Riker '96 (was Re: Wesley Crusher is returning???)
Organization: New Mexico Tech
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 21:28:42 GMT

In article <1992Dec9.204629.24984@cc.umontreal.ca> hamelph@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Hamel Philippe) writes:
>Picard/Riker in '96
>Engage!
>
>
>Paf

Wait a minute.  If they're running in `96, haven't they already one?
Being from the future and all, I mean.

Just a thought.
-- 
"Oh shit!  Who turned | spectre@nmt.edu  | "...and these are simply part-
my beer around?"      | Religion &       |  icles which move backwards in
Charlene at the Cap   | Foreign Language |   time." -- Freshman Chemistry
From: coop7z52@bnr.ca (Rahim Pira)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Galaxy-class Starships
Date: 17 Dec 92 22:08:57 GMT
Reply-To: coop7z52@bnr.ca (Rahim Pira)
Distribution: na
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.


	There was also another Galaxy-class starship in the episode "Conspiracy", captained by Picard's fried.  Unfortunately, the ship also blew up, causing the Enterprise to return to Earth.

------------
Rahim Pira