HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: st910174@pip.cc.brandeis.edu (TAC)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: TOM DERFALCO=HITLER???
Date: 8 Apr 92 03:26:44 GMT
Reply-To: st910174@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University

In article <1992Apr6.165224.16534@midway.uchicago.edu>, ror1@ellis.uchicago.edu (BANZAI the MASTER) writes:>
>
>
>I've heard a lot of talk of Tom Defalco being a real fascist dictator out to
>destroy the Marvel Universe as some of us loved it.  I haven't ever read FF or
>Thor so I can't vouch for those too (though the Thor I saw in Operation seemed 
>especially lame), but is this really true?  Does anybody think Tom is doing a
>good job?  What does PAD have to say about him?  Is he allowed to?
	Defalco has become really bad in the F.F comic. I have been following 
the comic for about four or five years starting with the return or Reed and
Susan Richards back to the team and was fairly satisfied with the way 
the comic was written. I'll admit that some of the stories weren't great but 
did not give me cause to dump the comic. Now ever since DeFalco got on the 
book it seems to me that all the progress in character deleopment over the
years of the books history has been suddenly reversed and the sudden shocking
family like issues (ok, most families don't battle Doc Doom) involving 
personal problems were all lost particularly the killing off of Johnny Storms'
Skrull wife (who was desguised as Alica Masters). Personally, when this was 
announced I thought "oh, no another one of those flashback unexplainable 
things that just happen in the Marvel Universe" but then it occured to me 
how many direction one could write about involving a Skrull wife (carring his
child no less) and conflict between the real Alcia Masters her, Ben Grimm,
the now missing Ms. Marvel Etc....(You can come up with the rest) I'm for
one is really disgusted my DeFalco'swork here.
	As for Thor, is a mixed reaction. Thor is now this reluctant type 
hero and many moral and personal problems in his life. I like that idea but 
some of the plot ideas are not too great or consistant. But is better than 
what is going on in the F.F comic. If he brings Thor back to soon I will be 
greatly dissappointed.                                                                              
>And also, are there any Moon Knight (old Moon Knight) fans out there?  Would 
>you like to form a posse with me so we can go and utterly kill and slay and 
>dismember Terry Kavanaugh for what he's doing to the book?  I want Chuck
>Dixon back, damn it!!!
	I've never been big on the Moon Knight, I have picked up a few of his
comics recently and I'm not sure what the trouble is with the comic would
you care to explain fully your disssappointment with the comic? It can't 
be worse than DeFalco can it?
	I it me or is Terry Kavanaugh an editor and not a writer. I think the
editors are taking over the writing jobs (and soon the art too) because they
are afraid all the writers and artists are leaving for other publishers.  Has
Mavel Comic gotten too facist in their control over their writers and
artists? The answer is Yup.

		------TAC
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Friday, 10 Apr 1992 21:26:28 EDT
From: <DCC117@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: RE: STARWARS

  - In one of the earlier posts on this topic, it was stated that
  "Splinter of the Mind's Eye" contradicted some of the later Star
  Wars films. In what way did it do so? I'm frankly just curious, as
  I don't remember much about "Splinter".  Also, I never heard of
  "The End of the Empire"; what was this work about, and is it
  regarded as official canon by anybody?


                                         -- THARIZDUN
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Deus Imperator)
Subject: Re: adamantium
Keywords: marvel, adamantium, Gaurdians
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 09:48:10 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.082721.6196@muddcs.claremont.edu> dcowell@jarthur.claremont.edu (Doug Cowell) writes:
>In article <167C9424.RCARR00@ricevm1.rice.edu> RCARR00@ricevm1.rice.edu (Rick Carroll) writes:
>>In article <1992Apr13.213623.11013@ms.uky.edu>
>>uk02700@nx05.mik.uky.edu (mitchell e french) writes:
>>
>>>
>>>In article <1992Apr13.183731.6138@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
>>>rymarz@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Daniel Rymarz) writes:
>>>> What is the tensile strength of adamantium?
>>>> Brinnel hardness?
>>>> Izod impact?
>>>> Modulus of elasticity?
>>>> Melting point?
>>>>
>>>> How do you sharpen adamantium claws?
>>>>
>>>> How unbreakable is unbreakable? Could you drop a tank of Wolverine and
>>>> have him come out smelling like a rose?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 	
>>>	According to the Handbook of the Marvel Universe, adamantium just
>>>doesn't change after it hardens.  It can't break, it can't bend, it can't
>>>be screwed with in any fashion.  They even say that it won't flow if it
>>>does melt.
>>>	Thus, adamantium claws never get dull, so they need no sharpening.
>>>	You could drop a tank on Wolvie and he would be smushed somewhat.
>>>His bones would not break.
>>>
>>Of course, in the most recent Guardians of the Galaxy, Rancor threatens one
>>of the Guardians with "the severed claw of her ancestor", i.e. Wolverine.
>>Fire that continuity man.  ;-)
>>
>>RIC
>They have also explained that by their time Adamantium isn't the hardest
>substance made anymore. You may remember Vance getting shot through his
>adamantium suit.(I still don't understand how they made a flexible suit
>out of the stuff, but....)
>

Actually, I wanted to bring this up, but it was kind of silly...
It states that Gladiator (Yes, the superman clone) broke it off in a 
fight.  So, either Gladiator is a lot stronger than anyone gives him 
credit for, he ate his wheaties that day, or, like diamond, adamantium
slowly, over time, begins to fall apart.  Enough, at least to create a 
fracture plane wide enough to break.  Keeping in mind Gladiator has at least
500 years to do this in, I wouldn't be holding my breath for it to happen.

Another point on how to sharpen adamantium.  At several points in the run of
U-XMen, it specifically shows wolvie scraping his claws together, and 
SPARKS shooting off.  We also have that famous poster of Captain America and
Wolvie fighting, with wolvie raking his claws on the shield, leaving a 
trail of sparks.  If it can spark, something's being lost.  Ergo, it can 
be dulled.  Ergo, it can be sharpened.  
-- 
Thanatos, DeathUrge, Master of a Bunch of Stuff tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
"Why would you think a priest any more moral than the rest of us?  Heavens
 sake's child, why do you think they're called 'Father?'"
					-The Company of Wolves
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: ror1@ellis.uchicago.edu (BANZAI the MASTER)
Subject: Re: MARVEL: X-ODUS replacements part II
Reply-To: ror1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 22:26:52 GMT

That post you referred to said that Scott Lobdell (the guy who is currently
slaying Alpha Flight and I think Shield, though I'm just basing this on the 
blurbs I'n reading about the book, and who completely desimated Excal. before Davis resued it) is an awful writer.  REALLY REALLY BAD.  Didn't I post
something about this?  Hmm...

Watch out for Lobdell, he may not be an editor, but he writes like one.

-BANZAI
ror1@midway.uchicago.edu

And by the way, I saw a post a while back asking for good indy companies to 
submit to, that anyone might have had success with.  I saw no answer, but
if people could EMAIL me sugestions, I would be very thankful.
From: rlawson@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: SOME NEAT STUFF IN THE NEW PREVIEWS (no spoilers)
Date: 7 Apr 92 23:42:26 -0300
Distribution: na
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In article <1992Apr4.002849.16255@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>, kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER) writes:
> OTHER COOL STUFF:

> Star Trek: the next gen Trading cards from Impel.
	Hmmm, I'd prefer to read the last 20
pages of Star Trek: Debt of honour that I
haven't read yet.
	Also I got a pack of the last series
of Impel Star Trek cards and was annoyed at
the manufacturing problems that seemed to
be rampant.
	Hmmm, maybe it's a marketing ploy
to make complete sets of correct cards
even rarer and more valuable.

> the new JSA series
	Is this the one that does a ELSEWORLDS
type treatment to the JSA, eliminating the
(forgot-the-name) Spear as propaganda and
establishing the real reason the JSA didn't
stop Germany as a guy who could negate their
powers.
> enough BATMAN RETURNS stuff to gag a blork
	We might possibly have to cannonize
Guide/PAD for this new word for the English
language.
	We're also going to have to get
Websters Dictionary to add 'blork' in.
> BLANDMAN from Eclipse--a parody of DC's horror titles ("IF IT'S
	WRITTEN BY A BRIT, IT HAS TO BE GOOD!")

	This is strange.   Eclipse first did
X-Farce (At least I think it was them), then
they planned to solicit Loco vs. Pulvereen
(or name something like that) for March
	Now they're doing this.

	I have a feeling that someone at 
Eclipse hates the BigTwo.

Ray Lawson
and Julian Castle (Why waste e-$$ when you can
mooch) {actually, I've got to mooch, my
account has 30% left out of $80
From: rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: RAC SPLIT: YES!!!
Date: 15 Apr 92 20:44:06 GMT
Reply-To: rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Dept., Madison, WI

In <2024@ra.nrl.navy.mil> ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil (G. Host) writes:
>> Article <703099445.0@selene.FidoNet> From: Ed.Almasy@f99.n121.z1.FidoNet.Org (Ed Almasy)
>> Where do you see snobbery?  Because they don't like the same type of comics
>> that you like?

>> What I find offensive are the posts from the "get a REAL newsreader" faction,
>> who think that because they have the latest software available on their system
>> (most likely with someone *else* maintaining it), everyone should have the
>> latest software for dealing with news, and TOO BAD for those that don't.

>Yep.  Those who complain that they can handle it are the biggest
>opponents of the split and typically they read one or two comics a
>month so it is easy to mark and read.

Gee, and here I thought I'd bought 20-30 books last month...

>Remember: cut out the refernce line to every message
>Net.terrorism at is best!

You have to change the Subject: line, too.  nn sorts by Subject: line.
It's not a fully-threaded newsreader.  (Not a big deal, really.)

-- 
Michael Rawdon
rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department, Madison, WI

"It is a fool's prerogative to utter truths that no one else will speak."
				- Dream, "A Midsummer Night's Dream"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: dethomas@amhux1.amherst.edu (The Human Torch)
Subject: Spidey vs Firelord (Re: xfactor vs xforce)
Organization: Grucci Fireworks Inc.
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 20:06:28 GMT

superc@festus.ksu.ksu.edu (Shawn E Chase) writes:
: 
: the same reason spiderman fought firelord and won. of course, if marvel ever did

Actually, Spidey beating Firelord is one of my favorite comics ever. It
shows that pure strength is not the only way to win a fight. Winning
that fight took everything SM had and it showed. Hell, he didn't even
put Firelord down too seriously. The point of the story was that
sometimes the good guys win through strength of character and
determination, not through pasting the hell outta the bad guys. 

Hmmm. That sorta in contrast to the current trend at Marvel. No wonder I
liked the story...

later days!
--dt

--
Dennis E. Thomas, Vagrant	   |    Amherst _still_ hasn't figured out 
dethomas@amhux1.amherst.edu 	   |     what do do with me, how could I 
roach@aux1.amherst.edu		   |    possibly presume to speak for them?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't read that. It will only make you mad."  --Craig Garnett
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: rogerk@QueerNet.ORG (Roger B.A. Klorese)
Subject: Re: DC: Forgotten Heroes (was Re: Bob Newhart...)
Reply-To: rogerk@QueerNet.ORG (Roger B.A. Klorese)
Organization: QueerNet
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 14:16:36 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.194658.29627@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, tpjg9663@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
(Thomas P. Johnston) writes:
|> My candidates for a new Forgotten Heroes group:
|> 1.  Black Lightning

New book coming in '92 or early '93.

|> 3.  Captain Marvel

New hardcover graphic novel by Jerry Ordway coming in '92 or early '93,
followed
by a new series.
-- 
ROGER B.A. KLORESE                                              +1 415 ALL-ARFF
rogerk@unpc.QueerNet.ORG                 {ames,decwrl,pyramid}!mips!unpc!rogerk
"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from."
                                                                   -- J. Foster
From: afarrell@maths.tcd.ie (Andrew Farrell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: adamantium
Date: 16 Apr 92 12:12:33 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Maths, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

In <1992Apr14.170141.1@camins.camosun.bc.ca> comp138w142@camins.camosun.bc.ca (Scott) writes:

>>>Of course, in the most recent Guardians of the Galaxy, Rancor threatens one
>>>of the Guardians with "the severed claw of her ancestor", i.e. Wolverine.
>>>Fire that continuity man.  ;-)
>> 
>> Apart from the ball-and-socket joints at the shoulder, there aren't many 
>> joints that couldn't be separated by cutting through ligaments, etc. Of 
>> course, Wolvie would have to be very dead for this to work, but there are 
>> many many ways to kill him. 
>> 
>>>RIC
>> 
>> Andrew.

>What are you talking about? "The severed claw..." means the claw was snapped
>		  		 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>off. (Actually, I read the book and she is definitely holding six inches of so
>of Wolvy knife (tm.)

>Scott.

Oh,bugger, there I go again. Ahem: I'M SORRY. I'M VERY STUPID. I didn't read the
Article very well, and I didn't read the comic at all.

Andrew.
From: branwen@cerebus.ccc.amdahl.com (Karen Williams)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: The Little Mermaid #4: Submerged in Horror
Date: 13 Apr 92 19:27:22 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1992Apr12.225739.1@fnalb.fnal.gov> morrow@fnalb.fnal.gov (I Elmo) writes:

>	The disturbing subtext I get from _Mermaid_ and pretty much every other
>Disney film is this:
>	Everyone falls in love forever at sixteen.  Love lasts forever.  Once
>you're in love, your life will be perfect.
>	Contrast this to the actual life that six-year-olds see:  divorced
>parents, loveless marriages, domestic violence, parents who dominate or
>manipulate or play mind games with their children.  I can't possibly blame that
>on Disney, but Disney is not giving children anything resembling realistic
>expectations for their future.  Instead of learning how to love, children are
>being taught that they will fall in love and live happily ever after.

I think the best view of love I've ever seen was in "A Boy and His Dog,"
by Harlan Ellison:

  '...she kept asking me, asking me, "Do you know what love is?"
  Sure, I know.
  A boy loves his dog.'

Vic and his dog, Blood, live in a horrible, post-holocaust future, depending
on each other for their day-to-day existence. The concept of "love" (sex and
romance) presented by the girl from Downunder had no bearing on their lives.
Love is friendship forged by shared hardships, not flowers and candy.


--
                                          Karen Williams
                                          branwen@cerebus.ras.amdahl.com
"Don't whine. Warrior women speak in a husky whisper."
  -- Brat Pack #3
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: More on Rogue
From: jjfink@skcla.monsanto.com
Date: 13 Apr 92 09:10:02 GMT
Organization: Searle, Skokie, IL
Nntp-Posting-User: jjfink

Speaking of missing items in Rogue's past... wasn't it mentioned at least once
that she is 'half alien'?

Or is that part of Carol Danvers/Ms. Marvel leaking thru?  I seem to recall
that her physiology was changed by becoming MM.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: teo33398@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Doctor Zero)
Subject: Re: Professor X (X-Men Cards)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 01:49:20 GMT

kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER) writes:
>Well Rachel is a cosmic avatar. Also Prof. X is the most powerful MUTANT telep
>ath on Earth.  I figure Phoenix(not really a mutant in power levels), Doctor
>Strange and a few others are more powerful than him.

	Also, one final point on the Dark Phoenix/Xavier power level debate.
Even though Chuck pretty soundly beat Dark Phoenix, he said after the battle
that he had help on the inside, in that Jean was helping him win.  Chuck's
powerful, but he MAY not have won without Jean's subconscious help....
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Hand in hand is the only way to land..."    The Cure
					    "The Lovecats"
finger teo33398@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu for the extended remix .sig...
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: crawford@sjuphil.uucp (Jeff Crawford)
Subject: Re: X-Men Traitor i.e. Gambit
Organization: Saint Joseph's University
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 20:22:06 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.042320.613@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> fal20643@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Capt. Frank A. Lauro) writes:

> Say, whatever happened to Henry Peter Gyrich?
Check out Nomad #1 and #2.  They're both cameo apperances, but it seems
he's still seems to be an active player in the Commission of Superhuman 
Activity or whatever they call it.  Val Cooper made a cameo in Nomad #2
also, so can X-Factor be too far behind?  Hint, hint PAD.

I'd personally like to see Nomad and Moonnight go at it.
Any opinions?


-- 
Jeffrey L. Crawford| Quote of the Week:  From Married With Children
    AKA   Roker    | 
 crawford@sju.edu  |  "A man is a man the rest of his life.
        or	   |   A woman is only sexy until you make her your wife."
 jc032441@sju.edu  |  						-Al Bundy
Disclaimer:  *If you like what I'm saying, seek psyciatric help. 8-)*
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: dani@netcom.com (Dani Zweig)
Subject: Re: From Doug Atkinson: The New Mutants
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 20:43:53 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

douga@yang.earlham.edu:
>
>PREMISE: The New Mutants as once they were...

>Magma
>Changeling
>Kevin
>Sensor
>Vector
>Ultimate
>Dusk
>Force

Is there any reason to call this group "New Mutants"?

As for the script, it's fun, but

a. You need to tell less of the story with captions.

b. Just a personal opinion, but I'd rather see the Hellions as
   occasionally friendly rivals and potential allies than as the
   permanent opposition.

-----
Dani Zweig
dani@netcom.com

   God helpe the man so wrapt in Errours endless traine  -- Edmund Spenser
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Thursday, 16 Apr 1992 10:07:00 CDT
From: <U16244@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Black Orchid mini-series
 <1992Apr15.193247.14768@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>

The fourth entity is the Floronic Man.  He became a Guardian, but then
got demoted I believe.  Never followed the series, but kept up with
his battles with Swamp Thing.  Excellent run if I must say so.

Doug.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: sherman@oak.math.ucla.edu (The Ahkond of Swat)
Subject: Re: SANDMAN: The end of Season of Mists
Organization: UCLA Mathematics Department
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 22:59:29 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.190044.13192@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> kieran@cmatter.physics.indiana.edu (kieran) writes:
>      To return to comics:  what do you think of the ending of Seasons
>of Mists?  I find it very ambiguous, in an unsatisfactory way.  I'm not
>sure what Gaiman is really trying to say.  Is God really unjust in his
>view?  Or did Remiel effectively rebel?  If so, is this how we can under-
>stand the cruelty of his torturing out of love?  (In effect Gaimain is
>saying:  the new hell is paved with good intentions, but they are no
>better than the old?)

Ah ... as Aziraphale would put it, it's "ineffable".  Remiel's Creator
(not God) pushed Remiel and Duma into their current situation, but 
Remiel objected: "I -- I will _rebel_.  Like Lucifer.  I will protest.
This is _wrong_ ...".  Perhaps someone who would react in this way (as
the Creator undoubtedly knew beforehand) deserves it.  Remiel and Duma
aren't entirely pure, either ... on page 21 of issue 28, Remiel says
"I am only here because of you ...".  Inquiring minds want to know!

Second-guessing omniscient beings is a losing battle.  That way madness
lies.

The new hell being paved with good intentions: one of the damned says
that it is much worse because of that.  Yikes!  Straightforward evil
has been replaced with evil which thinks itself good.  Marvelous!
--
 Bill Sherman     S^1 `--> S^(2n+1) -->> CP^n      sherman@math.ucla.edu
  The loudest mouth will hail the newfound way / To be King for a Day.
       - XTC, _Oranges and Lemons_, "King for a Day" (A. Partridge)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: jcowling@ophelia.UVic.CA (Scowling Jim Cowling)
Subject: Re: EPIC: Sam and Max
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 05:01:53 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.041735.10509@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> aoki@hermes.Berkeley.EDU (Paul M. Aoki) writes:
>The only stories I've seen are:
>	Sam & Max, Freelance Police Special Edition #1 "Monkeys Violating 
>	  the Heavenly Temple" (Fishwrap, 1987)
>	Critters #19 "Night of the Cringing Wildebeest" (Fantagraphics, 1987)
>	Grimjack #52 "Fair Wind to Java" (First, 1988)
>	Critters #50 "The Damned Don't Dance" (Fantagraphics, 1990)
>	Sam & Max, Freelance Police Roadtrip Special #1 "On the Road"
>	  (Comico, 1989)
>	Sam & Max, Freelance Police "Bad Day on the Moon" (Epic, 1992)

They also star in a strip in the quarterly LucasFilm Games newsletter (yes,
THAT LucasFilm) placed in computer game boxes (such as Secret of Monkey Island
II, Night Shift, etc etc)

------
Jim Cowling			|  "Ha!  Pronoun trouble.  It's not 'he doesn't
Creative Writing Department     |   have to shoot _you_ now', it's 'he doesn't
University of Victoria          |   have to shoot _me_ now'.  Well, I say he
Opinions Disassociated          |   _does_ have to shoot me now.  So shoot me
Fnord                           |   now!!"   -the immortal D. Duck
------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: pdm@turing.acs.virginia.edu (Patrick D. McClue)
Subject: Re: Powerpax
Organization: The Turing Project, Charlottesville Virginia.
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 19:22:56 GMT

In article <bsrjn-n.dani@netcom.com> dani@netcom.com (Dani Zweig) writes:
>phillies@wpi.WPI.EDU (George D. Phillies):
>>Mea Culpa: I don't read X-Force, and didn't note obvious clues that 
>>the Annual is ten years futurewards, though they were clearly spelled 
>>out.  So, from available clues, who could Powerpax be...
>
>I took it for granted that Francine was a composite of the current
>Power Pack.  This is quite consistent with the way the comic was written.
>
>-----
>Dani Zweig
>dani@netcom.com
>
>   Aphorism is better than none.

My first thought was that she was either Jack's or Alex's daughter...but
she is too old...so maybe she is a cousin who the others have given their
powers to....or another idea is that along the line Dr. and Mrs. Power had
another child and the older childern gave their powers to her.

Patrick
From: nc313127@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: about the beutirful, untouchable Rogue
Date: 16 Apr 92 22:43:15 GMT
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

About Rouge,

	a)  Didn't Xavier help her contorl her powers once so who she touched
	wasn't KOed and only a specific power was drained/copied?
        I hunt for it over the weekend, but maybe someone can find it faster.

	b)  how do I join the Rouge fan club?  Send me info
			Christopher A. Huff
			208 Arena Dr.
			Weirton,  WV  26062

The Blue Ninja
"Bang, You're Dead"

	
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics