Organization: Penn State University
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 16:24:11 EDT
From: <SXS30@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china
Subject: Another Version-Re: You violate my human rights!

In article <Bu0zu0.8M5@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>,
I990002%UNIVSCVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu (T. Bao) says:
>
>BNN(Business Network News) News (3 Sep 92 19:15 EDT) :
>
>A young man was arrested for taking some stuff from Kmart without payment
>earlier this week.

 A young man was arrested for talking inside Suck-mart without ask the owner
 first.

>
>A group of people who also had some misconducts in Kmart before gathered
>together and protested to the police that they had violated the human rights
>of the young man because he didn't resort violence. He didn't even carried
>a knife with him. He was a nonviolence advocate.

  A group of fired employee gathered outside the S-Mart and try to protest
 the unfairness of S-mart's policy as well as misconduct of S-mart's asslicker.
 According to protester outside the S-mart. The YM was arrested because he
 dare to speak in stead of using gesture language since the law of S-Mart
 was established on the base of everyone are deaf and mute.
>
>The police said that the young man had violated the law of Kmart so they had
>the obligation to punish the young man to protect the right of Kmart.

  Same. Just change the K-mart to S-mart.

>
>The group of people yelled at police: 'when in hell was the law passed?
>We didn't vote for the law. Why should we obey the law? It's not fair!
>And he is not an employee of Kmart. You have no reason to force him to
>obey the stupid law even if it really exists.'

  The protester yelled kicked some door dog at the S-mart and require the
 occupier of S-mart to explain the rediculous law, since some of them were
 fired by S-mart due to the same reason.
>
>The police put him in jail with no mercy. The group of people were outraged
>and held a rally in front the police station. 'No Repression', 'No Torture',
>'Human Rights' and 'Release YM Immediately' were seen on the posts. They
>also sent some representatives to lobby the Congress.
>
>The story about the young man were carried as the headline news in the media.
>One of the major newspapers published the young man's article written right
>before his adventure in the Kmart. He was quoted as saying that the Kmart's
>management was based on non-humane xxxism created by an Old Man and Kmart
>should change its management system so that people can get free stuff from
                                                       ***************
                                                    Can have the right to
                                                    by what they like.

>it.
>
>A small tabloid revealed that the whole event was a setup by some Kmart
>oponent (Walmart?) but very few people were convinced about that. It
>also said that this oponent had long targeted Kmart and wanted to destroy
>it.
>
>Some innocent people who were confused by the various news sources showed
>great concern about the event. They don't really like Kmart and complained
>about it now and then. They hope it will lower prices and offer better
>services. Unfortunately, they don't have access to the media to express
>their opinion even though they live in a free country. However, they do have
>a place to talk to their folks via something called email.
>
>People on the net were getting emotional after they started arguing about
>the motivation of the young man. Conspiracy or not doesn't matter as long
>as he wanted a better Kmart and it's his rights to do so, some argued.
>Others thought that he was used by Walmart and it's not ethic according to
>the established business codes. The debate is still going on.
>
>How Kmart will respond to the challenge is not certain. It was reportedly
>said that Kmart would put it in low profile so that its business can survive
>of Walmart's agressive competition. The CEO of Kmart privately admitted
>that Kmart really couldn't afford another war with Walmart.
  The suck-mart occupier insist on that by one get one free is not acceptable
 since it is contradict to "buy one must pay for another one" policy.


>The young man is still in custody at the moment of the dispatch of this
>report.

  An incest wrote a fabricate story and someone has to correct it.

Newsgroups: talk.politics.china