From: ccjames@cybaswan.UUCP (j hussell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
Subject: Apologies .... (was RE: Cutting you up!)
Date: 5 Oct 92 11:41:54 GMT
Reply-To: ccjames@pyr.swan.ac.uk (j hussell)

>> In previous article, The Whizzkid writes :
>>>> Who thinks that the Komet Kid looks a little bit like, in body size, WCW's
>>>> Super Invader???  
> 
>> The Candy Guru writes:
>>>Who here knows that the Comet Kid is really Paul Diamond, formerly Kato?
>>>(watches in delight as everybody but j hussell puts his/her hand up.)
> 
>> Yes, yes!! Let's put this shit to bed once and for all!!  I know that the
>> Komet Kid is Paul Diamond!!!  I know he was Kato!!  I know his real name's
>> Thomas Boric!!  Kiss my butt!!!
>> I just asked if you thought that he looked Super Invader!!  Don't you peOple
>> read the article before you flame???

>Two other things... (since that seems to be the popular topic)
>1) For what it's worth, no, I don't think KK looks anything like SuperInvader,
>except for the fact that they're both extremely dumb gimmicks.  IMHO.

>2) Yes, I read the article.  And I could easily ask you the same thing, as
>apparently you didn't bother to read my last line of text which read, if I
>recall correctly, I'm bored and in a bad mood.  This, for all you newbies,
>means that the flame guns will be on for the duration of the post, regardless
>of whether I'm right, wrong, or just plain mentally incompetent.  Which one I
>was is now beside the point, but I'm sure the Whizzkid (who himself needs a new
>gimmick) will say that the latter was, indeed, the case.

>   My point is is that I only flame people because I'm bored, or in a bad mood,
>or in most situations both.  I NEVER flame somebody because they flamed me
>first.  You, on the other hand, seem to be flaming out of spite more than
>anything else.

>>> Sssshhhhhhyyyyyeeeeaaaaah, riiiight!!  And monkeys might fly outta my butt!
>>I don't know... do they?
> No, but if you're not careful I'll make sushi outta yours!!

>For the record, the Whizzkid has just threatened me with physical violence. 
>This is, if nothing else, even more inappropos than swearing on the net. 
>Ordinarily, I would demand severe retribution, but I don't want it, because, by
>the nature of your flames, you're worth no more of my time than this followup
>post warrants.

O.K.!!  I'm not a nasty person, but your post made me a little mad!!  I didn't
threaten you with physical violence (really!).  I was just a tad irrate!! 
Deepest apologies for the harsh words posted by yours truly!!  

>>>> If Perfect had a braincell, he'd be dangerous, AND I DON'T CARE WHO TELLS
>>>> HIM!!!!!
>>>If you had a braincell, you'd be dangerous... and I *AM* telling you.
> 
>> 1)  I don't give a shit!!

>Say, that IS a revelation.

>> 2)  Can't you think of anything more original to say back!!

>Do I need to?  Remember, I was in a bad mood when I posted this, and people in
>bad moods tend not to be great thinkers.

O.K.!!  I can understand that.  I mean, look at what I posted in a bad mood!!
I can fully understand the logic behind your ideals.

>> 3)  Who the hell are *YOU* ????

>Oh, is THIS devastating repartee?  Here it is... I'm The Candy Guru, formerly
>known on this and all newsgroups as Dan Fielding.  I've been reading this group
>for almost a year now.  Yes, I've said and done more controversial things in
>the last year than most people have done in their entire lifetimes, and I
>refuse to go into detail concerning this.  And I've been wrong before... many
>times.  And I'll be wrong again... many times.  And though I don't profess to
>be a God, I DO know what the hell I'm talking about.  And, even more
>importantly, I don't need to be SOMEBODY like a Sean or a Herb or anybody else
>important to open up my flameguns.  If I did, then I'm damn sure I'd be asking
>YOU the same question right now.

No Problem!!  Don't lose it ....

>>>> I'am also wondering if what I hear is true; that some, if not most, of the 
>>>> WWF superstars have access to this usenet newsgroup???  I was told by one of
>>>> the guys over here!!!
>>>> Apparently, the WWF have their own computer dept. so the stars have access to
>>>> quite a few things.  Is this true, and if it is, Curt Hennig is an a*****e!!
>     "asshole" is fine here.
> 
>> O.K., you're an asshole!!

>Fine by me.

I've since been told the WWF stars access is a load of shitola!!  A different 
person has been talking to his American friends who know a WWF cameraman, and 
he has said it's a load of CRAP!!  So, I apologise again, most profusly ....

>> (Other unintelligent stuff deleted for obvious reasons)

>Like what?  My other point?  Because you know I'm right?

To be honest, I can't remember what was here!!

>>>> Long live the Undertaker (and you know he will!!),
> 
>>>Mmmm... nah.  I don't think so...
>>>Long live me.  
> 
> No way!!  I think not, my funky friend!!  Oh god, I think I'm gonna hurl ...

>Understand me, and understand me well on this one, buckshot.  Although the
>women here find me very funky, (which at Miami can mean "attractive") I am
>not your friend.  I didn't flame you out of spite, I didn't threaten to injure
>you, and I certainly didn't let your flame get under my skin too terrible
>much... something which obviously happened to you.

Ok, ok!!  You may be 'funky'.  You're not my friend.  But can you blame for
the flame??  I mean, it seemed as if you were giving me a flame for being a
mark (which I am not!!)  It just got me on a bad day, just as mine got to you
on a bad day!!

>>>The Candy Guru.
> 
The Whizzkid
-- 
James W. Hussell			      University College Swansea, Wales.
ccjames@uk.ac.swan.pyr			 	  	  ccjames@uk.ac.swan.vax
	    "The opinions above are not those of my employers"
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-