HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Mailer: mailout v1.26 released
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 23:03:29 MST
Comments:     <Parser> W: Field "Resent-From:/From:" duplicated. Last
              occurrence was retained.
Comments:     <Parser> W: Field "From:" duplicated. Last occurrence was
              retained.
Comments:     <Parser> W: Field "FROM:" duplicated. Last occurrence was
              retained.
From:         Ted Randall <Ted.Randall@STJHMC.FIDONET.ORG>
Subject:      help with emm386.exe and windows 3.1

Help!

I'm having problems getting Windows to run on a Zenith 386-20 when
the emm386.exe is configured into my config.sys.  I desparately
need to load some tsr's and such into high memory to make more
conventional memory available to dos applications running under win3.1

Has any body had problems like this?
--
Internet: Ted.Randall@stjhmc.fidonet.org
From: tabitha@vms.huji.ac.il
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Pixfolio
Date: 27 Aug 92 22:37:19 GMT
Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

I downloaded the new Pixfolio and have a problem.  I downloaded what
claimed to be several gif files from erratic.bradley.edu (136.176.5.253)
using ftp binary mode, as somebody e-mailed me to do.  When I tried to
view them in Pixfolio, it claimed there was an error.  When I clicked
close, it claimed a general protection error.  Does Pixfolio automatically
know what format the file is in.  Is it possible the file wasn't really
a gif?  Does the file need the *gif extention in order to be viewed by
Pixfolio.  And, where and how can I download *one* real gif image that
can be viewed in Pixfolio?
Thanks.
-dennis turner
From: kenneth@dekalb.dc.peachnet.edu (Kenneth Palmertree)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: windows hidden screens
Date: 23 Aug 92 17:29:44 GMT
Organization: DeKalb College
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

Hey,
  I also would like the info on the secret screens.  I missed the posting
about them.  Thanks in advance!


-- 
Real Name     : Kenneth Palmertree
Internet      : kenneth@dekalb.dc.peachnet.edu
Phone Number  : (912)-746-3034
Computer Type : Laser 486/33 Tower
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 19:33:58 +0200
From:         Paer Ekelund <d89pe@PT.HK-R.SE>
Subject:      More Word 4 windows questions

Hello again.

Now I have 2 new questions about W4W.

1. I have made myself a footer and stored it in normal.dot. When I change the
 footer how do I get the changes into a old document?

2. Is it posible to make a makro that asks for a password when I try to open a
 document? I thought I should use it to make a diary that only I could read, and
 nobody else that use my computer.

I hope that someone out there can help me with these questions.



	/ Eken / The Oak / Die Eiche / De Eik / Hrast / O Carvalho / Eiken
	/ Le Che^ne / La Encina / Roble / To"lgy / Kashi / Velanidia
	/ Alon / An Crann Daire / Xiang Shu / Quercus / Ca^y So^i =
	Paer Ekelund / Tranbaers v 19:4 / 372 38 RONNEBY / SWEDEN =
	d89pe@pt.hk-r.se / d89pe@ide.ide.hk-r.se.

If you know how to spell The Oak in other languages please E-mail me.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: University of Vermont
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R3).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 27 Aug 1992 13:47:48 EDT
From:         LZM@NIRVANA.UVM.EDU
Subject:      Full Page Display in PageMaker

The subject line says it- what size monitor at what resolution do you
need to see a full page at actual size in PageMaker?

Thanks!


Lynne Meeks
Computing & Information Technologies
University of Vermont
LZM@NIRVANA.UVM.EDU
From: KNOPF@FNAL.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: TurboC++ vs TpW
Date: 31 Aug 92 15:26:00 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  JNET%"win3-l@uicvm"

>   Just a little remark about a test i did today. I find TC++ ugly slow
>on my ps2 65. As i have the 2 compilers, i did a test.....
>Since debugging is a long and not easy process under windows imagine the
>time it takes using tc++. I am using C quite a lot but I am considering
>using Pascal now..
>Any comments?, Differences with TC++3.1 or MSC7.0?
>                  Dominique

 I use BC 3.1 (DOS version) in Windows full screen mode, using the
 .pif file that came with BC++. Compiling C code is quite fast, since
 windows provides plenty of memory for the compiler. For debugging I
 prefer a separate monitor, which runs the TD in text mode...

 Walter Knopf
From: EUREKA@BRLNCC.BITNET (Eduardo Haddad Filho)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Pixfolio
Date: 31 Aug 92 23:16:16 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

This is for someone who questioned the d/l of .gifs and trouble with
Pixfolio.
I had some problems downloading .gifs and today I found the solution:

FTP <site> UUENCODE <<<<<<< THIS IS IMPORTANT!
USER anonymous
cd /whatever
BINARY     <<<<<<<<<<< THIS IS IMPORTANT!
get <filename>
quit

This will send you the file in UUENCODE format. You must do a UUDECODE
(there are many source codes for decoders around).

Hope it helps.

Eduardo Haddad Filho
BITNET: EUREKA@BRLNCC
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 07:12:03 GMT
From:         Bob Kane <bob@WORMS-EMH2.ARMY.MIL>
Subject: Re: Secret Screen, will it end ???!
X-To:         Microsoft Windows Version 3 Forum
              <WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@pucc.princeton.edu>

It is very simple.  Every morning when I come into the office I bring up
email and 'delete subject secret screen'.  No more problem.  I suppose if
I was really fed up I could set may mail delivery program to delete these
message before they even get to me.  Still, with something like a 1000
messages a month from the win3 list, it seems a shame that 20% are about
pure fluff like easter eggs and bruised feelings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Kane                   Internet: bob@worms-emh2.army.mil (IP 134.235.9.2)
TechDyn Systems               Voice: (049) 6241-75936   (WORMS, GERMANY)
CMR 421, BOX 706                Fax: (049) 6241-74530
APO AE 09056                    CIS: 71054,2661
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL0]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 03:00:00 LCL
From:         Valdir Rossi Belmonte Filho <belmonte@INF.UFRGS.BR>
Subject:      Re: executable code sizes...

>> Often Pascal systems are not true compilers, they merely "compile" to
>> byte-code which is interpreted at runtime.  This is similar to what
>> most BASIC "compilers" do.  MSC allows you to generate byte-code
>> instead, but most people only do it for size, not compile speed.
>
> TPW is a true compiler.  No runtime DLL needed.
>
        Yes, and the difference in the generated executable size between
TC and TP reports back to old DOS-only ages [when surely there were
no DLLs :-)].
        Vance must be talking about UCSD Pascal, which *did* generate
P-code. I first saw this compiler a long time ago, and it was a version
for the Apple ][ !

==============================================================================
Valdir Rossi Belmonte Filho                      e-mail: belmonte@inf.ufrgs.br
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS
Informatics Institute
Porto Alegre, RS - BRAZIL

"So if you want my address is number one at the end of the bar,
 where I sit with the broken angels clutching at straws and nursing our scars"
 (Marillion)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 27 Aug 1992 08:31:00 EDT
From:         Bill Adkins <adkins@CAER.UKY.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Placement of text in Dialog

  I, too, had the problem of shifted and disappearing characters in dialogs.
As I remember, the problem was related to the string size of the transfer
buffer items vs. the edit box size...  I forgot, I think, to allow for the
NULL at the end of the char transfer buffer items..  It has been a while, but
I think I upped the char[] 1 byte and things shifted into frame.  It also
shifted button and check box settings.
  Hope this helps.



  Somewhat related, does anyone know how to set style attributes of edit
boxes (such as visible/not visible... tabstop/~tabstop) so that the
dialog items come up that way?  Changing the settings under program control
in the dialog constructor?????  I've had no luck.

                                     Bill Adkins.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 00:07:50 -0500
From:         Joe Morris <IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: More Word 4 windows questions

Date: 03 Sep 1992 19:33:58 +0200
From: Paer Ekelund <d89pe%PT.HK-R.SE@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu>

> 2. Is it posible to make a makro that asks for a password when I try to open a
>  document? I thought I should use it to make a diary that only I could read,
 and
>  nobody else that use my computer.

Paer,

If you are using W4W 2.0a, why don't you use the password feature built in?

______________________________________________________________________________
Joe Morris at Western Carolina Univerity; Cullowhee, NC     Practice safe hex,
Internet:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU                    Just say NO to viruses,
BITNET:    IS480P02@WCUVAX1.BITNET        And always wear a write-protect tab.
ALL-IN-1 mail users:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU@IN
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 27 Aug 1992 16:33:16 -0400
From:         nguyen%master.dnet@DXI.NIH.GOV
Subject:      COM PORT FOR WINDOWS

Hello everyone.

  I just have a curious question on windows.  I have been notice that every time
I try to run any DOS communications software; I get a "warning message" from
windows posing a "choice type" question like " com2 has been used by windows do
you want program A to take control of the com port (y/n).  My question is does
windows USE COM2 TO SHELL OUT TO DOS????. If yes then how can I avoid this
problem so that I can use my com port for my communications programs.

Thx for your time and efforts.

Khoi Nguyen
Nguyen%master.dnet@dxi.nih.gov
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 11:32:59 MDT
From:         "Ian P. Mitchell" <22016@UCDASVM1.ADMIN.UCALGARY.CA>
Subject:      Looking for Visual Basic discussion

From:    Ian P. Mitchell
*** Resending note of 92-09-02 10:45

>Does anybody know of a discussion group for persons doing software
>development in a Visual Basic environment?  Thanks.  -Ben

There is one LISTSERV list:
      VISBAS-L  at TAMVM1

Ian
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sun, 23 Aug 1992 00:50:46 PDT
From:         "Vance M. Gloster" <gloster@INFERENCE.COM>
Subject:      [Scarafino@MULTICS-A.PMS.FORD.COM: Re: Visual Basic as a serious
              :-) environment]
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU

 >Date:  22 August 1992 21:45 edt
 >From:  Leandre_Racicot%CMR001.BITNET at PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU
 >Subject:  Visual Basic as a serious :-) environment

 >Hi, and thanks to Vince and Vance for your comments and recommendations!
 >I went to a friend who has VB and plays around with it. After a quick tour
 >of the interface, I came up with a few questions:

I'll try to respond to the ones Vince did not answer already.

 >-Access to sound, animation, CD-ROMs?

Windows implements these functions in internal DLLs which you can call
like any other DLL from VB.  In fact, there is one function that
allows you to pass MCI command strings (text multimedia commands) to
the system.  This is the only one that you really need to connect to
to get full multimedia access.

 >-What is the "Pro" part of VB Pro about? OLE?

It gives you better "controls" (like 3D checkboxes), a help system
compiler (so you can make help files just like the pro applications),
and fills in a few holes in the original.

 >-Database management? And I mean a fast and useable DB!

There is an add-on for VB which addresses exactly this concern.  I do
not have the product.  It has a cute name like Visual BASE or
something similar.  We use Q&E's database library which allows you to
treat various files just like they were SQL databases.  This includes
Excel spreadsheets, DBASE files, and even formatted ASCII text files.
It also allows you to interface to Oracle, SQL Server, and other
databases running on the same or other machines (including UNIX boxes
and mainframes).  Microsoft is threatening to come out with a similar
product (this is in addition to their database).

 >-Speedy loading and execution, seems it takes almost forever to initialize?

Microsoft is working on this, it is a common complaint.

 >-Is there a way to get rid of that bulky VBRUN100.DLL?

No.

 >-How much is it gonna cost me if I wanted all the extras needed to make
 > an app professional looking? There is a new DLL add-on every week...
 >-Can I only dream of develop-(one or two 'p' ? It's late.)-ing in
 > order to make at least a few parts of my project portable, say, to
 > the Mac... I guess that is impossible with VB. How about C or Pascal?

Since I do not know exactly what you want to do, I do not know what it
will cost you.  With VisualBASIC and a databse library you will have
enough to create a professional-looking app.

Portability is a completely different issue.  Microsoft intends to
make the MFC classes (for C++ that I mentioned in a previous note) a
portable interface, and the Mac will probably be the next platform.
They may, however, port VisualBASIC as well.  The database will
probably not be portable at the same time as the rest of your code, if
ever.

Good luck!

-Vance Gloster
 gloster@inference.com
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 27 Aug 1992 16:08:51 EDT
From:         David Heck <O1DSH@AKRONVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: trident
              27 Aug 1992 15:00:09 EST from <IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU>

The TVGAW31A.zip & TVGAW31B.zip files CAN be found at wuarchive...
I was looking in the wrong directory <grin>...one of just many
brain farts today...vacation can't come quick enough this weekend!!
The files are in the mirrors/msdos/windows3 directory.  I've unzipped
them already and installed them, work  just fine!!  Thanks for all
the help and patience...

David Heck, jr.


"Patience is a virutue and a little wouldn't hurt you"...David Heck Sr.
;)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 1 Sep 1992 15:55:35 -0500
From:         Joe Morris <IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: about WINDOWS 3.0 SETUP/N
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu

Date: 01 Sep 1992 23:26:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Anne Liang <GOVE036%TWNMOE10.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu>

> I was told to run SETUP/N. However I failed with the error message:
> ERROR BUILDING WIN.COM.  What's going on?
>
> Any suggestion will be appreciated.

Anne,

I quote from _Windows 3.1 Secrets_ by Brian Livingston:

"When Setup is begun with the /N switch for installation across a network,
however, this "Other" procedure [of choosing the Other option wheen
choosing a display mode other than what Win3.1 offers] may not work.  Setup
displays the message "Error building WIN.COM!" and refuses to continue."

Seems you should try choosing one of the display drivers offered by Win3.1
and see if you get that far.  Or it may be this (I quote again):

"If you see the error message "Error building WIN.COM!" while running SETUP
/N, the automatic hardware detection routine that Windows' Setup program
performs may be conflicting with an adapter board installed in that PC.
(This message may also mean that files named WIN.CNF or 'filename'.LGO are
corrupted or missing in the orginal Windows directory youare installing
from.)"

If the above is the case, you can diable the detection routine by adding
the /I parameter (SETUP /I /N).  Note that the parameters must be in this
order--SETUP /N /I will not work.

Hope this helps.

______________________________________________________________________________
Joe Morris at Western Carolina Univerity; Cullowhee, NC     Practice safe hex,
Internet:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU                    Just say NO to viruses,
BITNET:    IS480P02@WCUVAX1.BITNET        And always wear a write-protect tab.
ALL-IN-1 mail users:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU@IN
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 31 Aug 1992 17:03:41 HFE
From:         Lalot <MAINT@FRAIX11.BITNET>
Subject:      TurboC++ vs TpW

That's me again,

   Just a little remark about a test i did today. I find TC++ ugly slow
on my ps2 65. As i have the 2 compilers, i did a test.
As my C drive is very slow (IBM SCSI....) windows is on the net and
the compilers too.First release of CPWIN and TC++(Win) 3.0

I found in the examples the same object application.
  editapp.pas and editapp.cpp

editapp.pas  compiled and executed in less than 5 sec
editapp.cpp    "             "     in less than 2 minutes and half ????||||
             (precompiled haeders)
             parse the includes 1 min
             compile  25 sec
             link     40 sec
             exec     10 sec
Since debugging is a long and not easy process under windows imagine the
time it takes using tc++. I am using C quite a lot but I am considering
using Pascal now..
Any comments?, Differences with TC++3.1 or MSC7.0?
                  Dominique
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 11:56:44 CDT
From:         96942392@UWWVAX.UWW.EDU
Subject:      Professional Draw

Hello,

I just receive Pro Draw for Windows a couple of days ago.  I was wondering
if anyone out there is using this program.  I have had it crash on me
three times so far, and atleast 2 of those times I was not doing any
that was using "advanced" features of the program.  I am currently running
Windows 3.1 with 8 megs of RAM on an IBM Clone 386 40Mhz.  Has any one
else had the program crash on them?  Thanks in advance.

Rick Johnson
96942392@UWWVAX.UWW.EDU
University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

P.S.  This program is from Gold Disk.  Also "I was not doing any" above
should be "anything".  Thanks!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 10:49:00 CDT
From:         $LPAHM0@LUCCPUA.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Writing Sectors in Windows

> Hi,
> I have to write phisical sectors of a Disk inside a Windows-3.1 program.
> I{d like to know if anybody have ever do the same. I used the BIOSDISK
> function of C++ and it used to work fine (in DOS programs, you know),
> but inside Windows I{m not able to.    Hope somebody can help me. Thanks|
>                      Javier.

==========================================
Javier,
I nerver tried to do absolute sector operation, but obviously Windows
even Win31 didn't heritate DOS function very well, typically on disk
operation. I already have anoying experience on File operation. I have
some program that was involved in sector operations, which need to be
convert to Win31. I will let you know if I ever solve this problem.

*************************************************************************
* How many programmers it takes to change a light bulb?                 *
* None, That is a HARDWARE JOB!                                         *
*************************************************************************
* David                Chicago, IL, USA                                 *
* Tel:                 Email:                                           *
* (312)508-5625        $lpahm0@luccpua(bitnet)                          *
* (708)866-3475        $lpahm0@luccpua.it.luc.edu(internet)             *
*************************************************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 18:09:13 EDT
From:         "Kris Beatty" <krisb@WESTFORD.CCUR.COM>
Subject:      Re: Win31 Swapfile probs
              03 Sep 92 15:48:24 -0600.
              <9209031753.aa25095@masscomp.westford.ccur.com>

> BOB KANE: Do you suppose that
> Windows will not install a permanant swap file on any drive that exceeds a
> certain size, say 40MB?

Also keep in mind that not only does the disk have to be defragmented it also
needs to be clear of bad spots (ie... slip sectored).  Not sure how they
do it on PC's, but under unix we format with a bad sector list and the
program slip sectors as much as it can.  I am not sure if Norton Utils will
show you these bad spots.


My $.02,
Kris Beatty
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Project IDEALS -- The University of Alabama
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 1 Sep 1992 13:48:00 CDT
From:         "Chet Farmer, Asst. Dir., Project IDEALS" <CFARMER1@UA1VM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: WinSpeed
              1 Sep 1992 04:28:22 GMT from <edowdy@VAX1.UMKC.EDU>

All this talk of unpredictable results from Winspeed has lead me to one
conclusion, and one conclusion only:

Screw Winspeed; I'm getting an ATI Ultra.


-c


+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Chet Farmer, Assistant Director   |   English / 103 Morgan           |
|  Project IDEALS -- FIPSE, DoE      |   Tuscaloosa, AL  35487-0244     |
|  University of Alabama             |   tel 205-348-9494               |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  "There's room in my boat for just about everyone" -- Raymond Carver  |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: WinSpeed
From: edowdy@vax1.umkc.edu
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 04:28:22 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Kansas City

In article <rhughes.59.0@UCSD>, rhughes@UCSD (Richard J. Hughes) writes:
> In article <1992Aug31.054909.13838@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> skcgoh@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Shaw Goh) writes:
> 
>>I'm just trying out WinSpeed.  Has anyone heard of it?  I've got a
>>Trident 1Meg card.  I know that the version is for Windows 3.0 (I'm
>>using 3.1) but it worked fine.  The question is, IS IT ANY FASTER???
>>Honestly, I can't see the speed difference, but the money I paid for it
>>must've been worth something!!  Has anyone got any comment at all??
> 
> Yes, return it and get your money back.  It's no faster than any other 
> drivers optimized for Windows 3.1.  At least it was no faster than Orchid's 
> own driver for the Pro Designer IIs or ATI's drivers for the VGA Wonder.
> 
> Richard

	There is a guy in mswindows misc who says that his trident card
is 50% faster than it used to be using the Winspeed drivers.

	we have people reporting both sides of the fence here. Is winspeed
that unpredictable?  Why are we getting conflicting reports> I would think
that if the drivers sped up windows performance it would do so on a fairly
regular basis for people. Even from those with the same cards (trident) I have
 heard conflicting things here. Which is it? I'm not saying anyone is
misreporting by any means, I am just wondering what would cause the
 seemingly different performances for different people?

Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU