HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rkelly@carina.unm.edu (Robert Kelly)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Catholic Killer on the Loose!
Date: 15 Apr 92 20:58:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: lynx.yazjg9a
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <92104.114619SECBH@CUNYVM.BITNET> SECBH@CUNYVM.BITNET writes:
>
>This morning I called the VISN network and talked to a representative.
>He agreed that even though the speaker on the program, Mrs. Kelly,
>had been opposed to what she termed "safe sex" that by classifying
>IUD, pills and hormones as "safe sex" techiques that she could
>lead many persons, especially teen-agers, into fatal miscalculations.
>
>The program director will cancel the remaining showings for this
>week 
>
>If anyone wishes to discuss this with network representatives of
>the VISN network their number is (212) 602-0738.

I just called these folks and I wish to say that they are very nice.
The program was cancelled.  If anyone else wants to thank them and doesn't
mid the phone bill, give them a call.

Robert Kelly
rkelly@triton.unm.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grown men do not need leaders.
        Edward Abbey
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer)
Subject: Re: Deletions
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 00:42:27 GMT

In article <57180@cup.portal.com> Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison) writes:
>Pungent maleness may be an aroma, thick musk or an overpowering
>odor; but neither a sweat-drenched trucker nor a sun-ripened
>Biker *REEK*.  That is a word reserved for UNIX, rotting fish,
>Jesse Helms and certain amazingly nauseating chemicals -- like
>putrescine, or ethyl mercaptan.

Now, George, some of us have stood next to you at a bear hug...
Let's just say I spend more time next to my Sun workstations...
:-)

-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
From: exotica@milton.u.washington.edu (Tsilke Pearlman)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: These Boots Weren't Made For Walking
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:39:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: milton.exotica.702844743
Organization: University of Washington

nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:

>Why do women own so many more shoes than men, on the average?

Becauase there are so many different *occasions*, my dear.

Boots, I agree with Jeff, are the greatest, tho I have latley found
great pair of Doc Marten *shoes* that I wear when I need a break.

Favourite boots in my woman sized collection (all in black unless
otherwise noted):

	Safeco Combat (work) boots- weigh a ton. Steel toes.            
	Doc Marten "lady" combat boots (when I'm feeling 'delicate').
	Unknown brand Cowboy boots- once in a while.
	Motorcycle boots (the ones with shin guards and lots o' buckles)
	Knee high "riding" boots (Riding. Uh huh. [;9)
	Northwesty (or GAP-y) soft ankle boots (For work, when I'm nice)
	A second Northwesty pair in brown.   


	Leather Imelda?

And I couldn't do without a single pair. A lady must dress for the 
occasion, you know...

Tsilke,
Who has also been known to crawl after boots she *really* likes...
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: rjwill6@PacBell.COM (Rod Williams)
Subject: Re: D.C.con?
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Francisco
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 19:42:33 GMT

> michelle@rlgvax.Reston.ICL.COM (Michelle Elliott) writes:

>Motss-con in D.C. '93 motto (proposed):
>
>"Bringing style and perversity to the president's doorstep",

...or "JoJo Goes to the White House"... :-)
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
rod williams -=- pacific bell -=- san francisco -=- rjwill6@pacbell.com
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: ACM022@Zeus.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance)
Subject: Re: These Boots Weren't Made For Walking
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 07:14:40 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.11

In <j9sg98o@fido.asd.sgi.com> dauber@sgi.com writes:

> Ah, boots... Why would one wear anything but?

Well, if you're against buying leather products, boots can be naughty. I
myself don't own any, but not due to any real dislike.

Motss relevance: What's your favorite pair of shoes?

I have 2. The first is my pair of red Converse hi-tops. I covered the star
logos with a 'double male symbols' pin and a Tick pin (SPOON!). Very comfy,
very individual. They're getting ragged, though, and I can't find any like
them anywhere. They only sell them in white anymore. *sigh*...
I also have some really fab rope sandals. Bought them at the Minnesota
Ren Faire last summer, and they get lots of comments. Some kid told me they
were shoes like God wears. I liked that. I can't wear them on wet days,
though, because they soak up water like sponges.

And then, of course, there are my *BIG* *RED* *PUMPS*...

---
John Dorrance				** Disco Diva y Flamenco Chico **
ACM022@zeus.unomaha.edu
	You bring me to my knees while I'm scratching at the eyes
	Of a world I want to conquer and deliver and despise.
From: barnesm@vavau.Corp.Sun.COM (Mark Barnes)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Mormon pamphlet: "For Young Men Only"
Date: 7 Apr 92 02:13:48 GMT
Reply-To: barnesm@vavau.Corp.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: vavau.corp.sun.com

In article 16438@cs.ubc.ca, manis@cs.ubc.ca (Vincent Manis) writes:
>(Is it just me, or are the Mormons the funniest religious organization
>west of the JW's? Not only do their scriptures feature the Book of
>Ether, but also the Book of Nehi. And at that, they can't even spell it
>right.) 

Don't look any funnier than any other 'religion' I've looked at.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark               "When no one can tempt you with heaven or hell
                        you are a lucky Man." -- Oh! Lucky Man (movie)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: jontom@HQ.Ileaf.COM (J.T. Kittredge)
Subject: Re: Heinlein & Who Are Vincent's Three?
In-reply-to: michelle@rlgvax.Reston.ICL.COM's message of 9 Apr 92 12:35:49 GMT
Reply-To: jontom@ileaf.com (JT Kittredge)
Organization: Interleaf, Cambridge, Mass
Posting-Front-End: GNU Emacs 18.52.65 of Mon Apr 22 1991 on kontrol (berkeley-unix)
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 14:10:33 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.123549.25303@rlgvax.Reston.ICL.COM> michelle@rlgvax.Reston.ICL.COM (Michelle Elliott) writes:
>Well, I don't know about the three, but I just found
>a new one last night -- Thomas Disch.  I haven't
>heard much of him lately, but he's pretty well-known.

Was Mr Disch the one who wrote "The Brave Little Toaster"?
- JonTom
-- 
"'Life is distracting and uncertain'
  she said, and went to draw the curtain" - The Eleventh Episode, Edward Gorey

Newsgroups: soc.motss,ca.politics
From: onr@netcom.com (D. Owen Rowley)
Subject: Re: Charles Turing's Untimely Death
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 05:28:05 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <ART.92Apr12202148@world.std.com> art@world.std.com (Al Thompson) writes:
>In article <s4lp9INNcsc@agate.berkeley.edu> gnn@mastodon.cs.berkeley.edu (George Neville-Neil) writes:
>
>   In article <1992Apr8.235253.16586@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> jfh@greenber.austin.ibm.com (John F Haugh II) writes:
>   What ?!?!  Did you somehow sleep through the 80s ??  Most of the work
>   on AIDS was done by doctors who gave a shit and faught with the Raygun
>   administration for funds.
>
>This is a flat lie.  The fact is that AIDS gets the second highest
>research funding for all diseases, second only to cancer.  This has been
>the situation for at least the last five years.  Two of those five
>budgets were submitted by Reagan.

What is it that yanks your chain Al?
Do you have a problem with research funding for AIDS.
You do understand that medical researchers who know better than you
fear that if they don't combat this virus theres big trouble ahead!
Is it a lie that Reagan never spoke the word in public till he was a lame
duck?

You know if I wasn't such a nice guy , I'd think you had a chip on your
shoulder ..
big boy!

LUX .. owen

-- 
D. Owen Rowley .. Note this acct is not my primary USENET access
mail gets to me quicker if you send it to owen@autodesk.com

*No matter where you go, there you are.*
From: jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com (Jake Coughlin)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Charles Turing's Untimely Death
Date: 13 Apr 92 16:15:50 GMT
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research
Originator: jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com

djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM:
> jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com (Jake Coughlin) writes:
>> > Physician heal thyself!
>> bigot, fuck yourself!
>
> Nothing like the TRUTH to prick the old nerve endings 'eh?
> I love it.

is that you're posting here, djk?  to get your ending pricked?  it's
ok, babycakes -- i love having someone prick my ending too!  since
you're newly outta the closet, i'll outline some of *my* favorite
methods of being boned big time:

(1) doggie style.  one post can not possibly describe everything about
this method so the exercises are left to the reader -- boy, are *you*
gonna have fun, djk!  the doggie style is probably the best position
for bad boys with boning backbone!  on his hands and knees, the bottom
is braced for a rough ride while the top wraps his hands around the
bottom's shoulders or hips like the steering wheel of a ferrari and
works the inner anus until the transmission's gears are just a
screaming from lube breakdown!  even better, this position allows for
the Indy 500 as the top is also free to be entered from behind.  just
think of all that piston action -- it's better than the princess and
the pee-pee!

(2) bottom on top.  the fucker lies down on the bed, and the fuckee
clutches his cheeks and plops himself down on that hard member -- the
top gets a great view often reminding one of the first time they saw
a hot knife plow thru cold butter.  a better fuckee will use his hands
to clench his butt cheeks together to massage the fucker's shaft.  this
is probably my favorite position because you can feel the entire cock
along the walls of your inner rectum as his pubic hair scratches your
tender butt cheeks.

(3) side to side.  this is probably the most romantic position with the
two men lying on their sides, front to back.  the fuckee not only gets
to feel his fucker's big schlong in his butt, but the fucker's hands
are free to massage the fuckee's nipples, or play with the fuckee's
balls and hard cock.  the fucker can also rub his inner thighs against
the fuckee's legs, and just before orgasm, the fucker can lightly
massage the back of the fuckee's neck, running his tongue in circles or
figure eights.

whew!  now there's some *hot* sex -- did my truth dare to prick your
ending?

-- 
Jason Coughlin ( jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com )
Queer Without A Cause!
"I find myself suddenly in the world, and I recognize that I have one
right alone: that of demanding human behavior of the other." -- Fanon
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: Depressing Scumpits? Re: Regarding the NY/NJ CON Proposal
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 00:35:35 GMT


In article <1992Apr9.233358.9267@gordian.com>
mike@gordian.com (Michael Thomas) writes:

>In article <1992Apr9.223007.26424@macc.wisc.edu>,
>anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:

>>In article <ku9e1fINNhop@mizar.usc.edu>
>>adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:
 
>>>P.S. I hope you don't want to disappear the base of Laurel Canyon --
>>>I'd have to move, and that's such a chore.
 
>>Why darlin', what*ever* are you talkin' about?  You just
>>wait for the Santa Anas, pickup up your purse, and spread
>>your gossamer wings -- you'll be in Vegas in a trice!

>Wrong direction, the Santa Ana's blow out to sea. The only thing
>that blows toward Las Vegas are the bowling league motor homes...

Mercy, that wouldn't be right for Arne, he'd be too
miserable, I'm sure.  Well, somebody out there please makes
sure he packs his water wings.  Of course, maybe he could
land on a Faaaabulous Yacht bound for Bora Bora.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: foye@unagi.cis.upenn.edu (Rob Foye)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Bear Jargon
Date: 17 Apr 92 17:18:02 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.152410.18555@quantime.co.uk>, roger@quantime.co.uk (Roger Phillips) writes:
|> In article <21263@scicom.AlphaCDC.COM>,
|> rcw@scicom.AlphaCDC.COM (Robert White) writes:
|> > 
|> > Name for a group of bears:  Sleuth of bears.
|> 
|> The impression my OED gives is that this is a variant of
|> a *sloth* of bears.	:-)
|> 
[examples deleted]

|> No comment.

Why? Are you too slothful to comment?  ;{)
From: randyc@autodesk.com (Randy Clark)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Pride Parades
Date: 14 Apr 92 01:50:32 GMT
Organization: Autodesk, Inc., Sausalito, CA


In article <1992Apr9.141458.3360@fig.citib.com> glp@fig.citib.com
(Greg Parkinson) writes:
>My first couple of pride parades were in San Francisco; I thought
>*that* parade was large.  Then I went to my first NY parade - 
>and was awed.

	Huh?  I've heard repeatedly that the SF parade is still
	the largest -- in fact, the second-largest parade of
	any kind in the country.  Does anyone know the numbers
	to back this up -- or deflate as local hype?

	Nothing against NYC or its parade, mind.  I'm just curious.

>And then there *is* Ry's DISPLAY.  I missed it last year, I
>won't make the same mistake this year.

	Sounds divine to me.
	So do your shorts, for that matter.  ;-)

	Although I have to confess to -- is this heretical? -- growing
	burned out on the parade lately.  The energy and atmosphere
	are wonderful ... but the events are so very much the same,
	over and over.  Maybe I'm just sour because I was both single
	and solo on the last two occasions.  Makes things a little
	less festive, though I did eventually connect with good friends
	on both occasions -- never have met anyone new on Parade Day,
	however.

	Hm.  Well, I'm sure to be there this year too, and maybe
	circumstances will be different.

	Cheers, -R


--
There is a sad gaiety in our love, and though we have more wit
than Sunday lovers by the water's edge, our wit attracts misfortune.
							-- Genet
Randy Clark			{}!autodesk.com!randyc
From: huxtable@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Kathryn Huxtable)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Asimov and sexism
Date: 7 Apr 92 17:43:07 CDT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

In article <1992Apr3.181340.17432@rlgvax.Reston.ICL.COM>,
    michelle@rlgvax.Reston.ICL.COM (Michelle Elliott) writes:
> I HAVE noted that Asimov's fiction tends to share that
> simplistic, cutesy, adoring, het, "put women on a pedestal
> because they are kind enough to love us ugly old men in
> spite of all our faults" flavor that Heinlein's does.

At least he's been quite outspokenly feminist (and
pro-choice---imagine Heinlein pro-choice!) in his
non-fiction for awhile now.  I assumed it was Janet's
influence....

I still haven't quite assimilated the news of his death.

-- 
Kathryn Huxtable              \   "Women who laugh too much, and the women
huxtable@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu   /\   who love them." --- Jamie Anderson
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Czech this out (was Re: outing the stars)
Date: 14 Apr 92 01:46:12 GMT
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison


In article <1992Apr14.002734.4587@reed.edu> nelson@reed.edu
(Nelson Minar) writes:

>I'm offended not ONLY that you didn't spell my name correctly, but
>that you neglected to infer the original Czech spelling, thereby
>denying my European heritage. From henceforth I demand that if you
>refer to me by my family name, you use it properly - "Mlinar". Yes,
>it's pronounced /Mine er/, but it has an "l" in it.

Um, both the M and the L would be pronounced in Czech, /mlee'-nar/.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: kiser@ifi.unizh.ch (Markus Kiser)
Subject: Re: These Boots Weren't Made For Walking
Organization: University of Zurich, Department of Computer Science
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 18:39:31 GMT

In article <bpqjtzf.jfh@netcom.com> jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton) writes:
>I was in a used clothing store the other day, and they had some used boots.
>I tried them all on, and lo and behold, one pair was inexpensive,
>comfortable, and not horribly ugly.

I also bought some boots a while back. Not cowboy boots as you describe,
but black boots with a flattened tip and a metal ring on both sides of
the ankles. I bought them new and they cost me around $160.

I just have to admit that I love them.

>Well, practice makes perfect.  What do you folks out there have to say
>about the proper way to walk in boots?

A good way is to give in to the feeling you'd fall. You won't fall.
Your body just needs to do some extra balancing to keep you upthight 
when walking in boots. It's nice if you learn to do that balancing
with your legs and hips only and don't need your whole body for it (which
probably would result in a very funny walking style).

Ever tried to *dance* in your boots? This is a very nice way to get
a good feeling for them and you will learn that you can do certain things
much easier with boots than with ordinary shoes, like follow the rhythm,
twist your feet or turn yourself around. Your boots may considerably
improve your dancing style.
(You might not practice dancing at home after midnight like I did once,
if you are living in a house with other people, unless you particularly
enjoy angry neighbours ringing at your door at 2am asking you what the hell
was going on in your place...)

Finally, listen to the sound your boots make while walking with them. If it
is a nice, regular 'toc-toc-toc-sound' then you start doing it right. You
are doing it even better if people start to turn around to see who makes
that interesting sound. And you are doing it perfect if the people turning
around all happen to be nice, young men, giving you a nice smile...

--markus, going home now  (toc, toc, toc, ...)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Heinlein and sexism (Was Asimov and sexism)
From: mike@batpad.lgb.CA.US (Mike Batchelor)
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 22:11:22 PDT
Organization: The Batchelor Pad

mara@panix.com (Mara Chibnik) writes:

> As for the household word, I'm no sf maven.  Mixer?  Blender?
> Chopper?  Spoon?  Lamp?  Staircase?

Marion Zimmer Bradley, I think, is who was supposed to be the household
word.

Anybody know about Ray Bradbury?  If there is a household word among
sci-fi authors, he is it.

For some very EROTIC stories, read John Varley's "Titan" series.  Oh
my!  It's getting hot in here just thinking about those horse
creatures in heat... !



[] ---
[] Mike Batchelor -- mike@batpad.lgb.CA.US -- cerritos.edu!batpad!mike
[] Long Beach, California
[] TNG Quote: "You were travelling in close formation at over 80,000 kph, only
[] 10 meters from Cadet Albert, and you didn't even know his orientation?!?"
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: The name claim to fame game
Date: 17 Apr 92 20:48:49 GMT
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison


Gad!

In article <1992Apr17.202831.14665@macc.wisc.edu>
anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:

>It's truw that we harpsichordists, having become proficient
         e
>at trilling with all ten fingers, can often play the most
>remarkable socres.
            scores

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca (Gene Ward Smith)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: outing the stars
Date: 16 Apr 92 18:12:13 GMT
Organization: Centre Interuniversitaire en Calcul Mathematique Algebrique

In article <kumebkINNo05@mizar.usc.edu> adolphso@mizar.usc.edu
(adolphson) writes:

>I would rather die than eat decomposed cod ever again.  I ate more
>than my fill as a child, thank you ever so much.

It's a ritual. We had lutefisk only once. We all hated it. When we asked
our mother what *she* thought of the stuff, she admited they used to run
around the farmhouse in Minnesota screaming "ish ish lutefish" every
Christmas Eve. This is what makes a holiday great.



--
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/CICMA/Concordia University 
                  gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Big Bri)
Subject: OUTING, cont.
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 19:07:03 GMT

>>I think the subject says it all. Personally, I think it's very unethical
>>for gays to out other gays. 

>Why don't you spend a little time thinking about:

>1) gay rights is not about right to privacy.  It is about the right
>to openness.  It is about walking down main street and kissing your
>lover on the corner in full view like all the strayts do.

Don't privacy and openness go hand in hand (pun not intended). One should
have the choice of being open or remaining private. No one has any right
to reveal the sexual orientation of anyone except that person (unless
that person is homophobic in public and homo or bisexual in private, IMO).
One should be open SOLELY by one's own choice, IMHO.			
 
>2) Privacy implies secret implies bad.  As long as our sexuality is
>something that shouldn't be talked about, we'll be something that should
>be tolerated.

Perhaps. But are you saying that anything that is private is bad? I hope not.
Let's face it, up here at Clarkson anyways, homosexuals are not looked upon and 
treated very favorably by most. If that person is outed, he would likely
be subjected to very unfavorable (to say the least) treatment. Privacy allows
people peace of mind. Bad is only "bad" because our society says it is;
individual consciences may differ. It is not up to you or anyone else to
determine what is "good" or "bad" for me; that's my choice; and vice versa.

>3) Why is it different saying "Johnny Depp likes to take it up the butt
>and is queer as a three dollar bill" and "Johnny Depp likes the color
>red"?  

If Johnny Depp wants to keep his fetish for the color red private, why is
that any of my or your damn business?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BRI FARENELL 	  is a bleeding heart liberal card-carrying member of the ACLU.
CLARKSON '95
FARENEBT@CRAFT.CAMP.CLARKSON.EDU

"Yassir Arafat had a terrible accident. He tried to fax a mail bomb...."
	---Johnny Carson
From: bfbear@penn.Gwinnett.COM (Penn Collins)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: San Francisco?
Date: 5 Apr 92 05:26:52 GMT

help?
I have a job 'nibble' in S.F.-
can anyone tell me about cost of living/housing/etc...etc...
(I think the motss relevance is acceptable.)
(please e-mail this)
thanks/growf!
Penn