HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: wbarnes@sura.net (Bill Barnes)
Subject: Re: Alien 3 - A Real Good Movie
Organization: SURAnet, College Park, MD, USA, NA, Earth, Milky Way
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 22:33:08 GMT

In article <1992Sep4.133807.26084@twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com> mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Ed McCreary) writes:
>In article <1992Sep4.035301.14427@latcs1.lat.oz.au> jd@slc3.lat.oz.au (John Dimogotsis) writes:
>>	Also in the extended laser disk version "4" sentry robots are used
>>	to defend the complex from attack when the aliens come through the 
>>	tunnel, looks good why the hell they left it out in the first place
>>	I can't imagine.
>Cameron felt, and I agree, that it slowed down the pacing of that
>section of the movie.

Umm, actually, he left it out because of time constraints - the movie had
to be under 140 minutes, based on the commandments for Fox executives,
and something had to go, and this was one of the scenes.

The bit with Burke cocooned in the wall was cut for this reason (as well
as some other reasons), but the sentry guns were left out because there
wasn't enough time.  Otherwise Cameron wouldn't have called the special
edition (paraphrasing here) "Aliens the way it should be without time
constraints."  8-]
-- 
Bill "Whassamatter?!  Can't you take a joke?!" Barnes   wbarnes@sura.net
Disclaimer:  The author apologizes for any thought-provoking material he may
	     have accidentally included and promises not to do it again.
Datclaimer:  My employers wouldn't WANT to share some of my opinions.
From: m1nss01@fed.frb.gov (Neil S. Seftor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Film with the least actors
Date: 9 Sep 92 11:52:21 GMT
Reply-To: m1nss01@fed.frb.gov (Neil S. Seftor)
Organization: Federal Reserve Board, Wash, DC

If not the least, a close follow-up would have to be The Quiet Earth,
if you are counting only people who have some actual part.  There are
only three characters in this movie, and a lot of dead people.
From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Comments on Siesta?
Date: 10 Sep 92 17:03:02 GMT
Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU
Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH

andre@rurutu.wri.com (Andre Kuzniarek) writes:

>Thought _Siesta_ was mildly interesting. Just don't understand all the  
>hoopla about Barkin. Her screen presence and acting are average, and her  
>looks are below.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is, of course, a subjective matter.  I find her quite
attractive, and interesting to watch.
-- 
   Brice Dowaliby, Fluent Inc., 10 Cavendish Court, Lebanon, NH  03766
                         bd%fluent@dartmouth.edu        
             I don't speak for them, they don't speak for me
                              DoD # 0698
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dprice@convex.com (David Price)
Subject: Re: Peter Pan meets Dinomonsters (Jurassic Park)
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 23:29:58 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

jcwasik@srv.PacBell.COM (Joe Wasik) writes:

>I've seen so many comments about Jurassic Park.  None of the articles that
>I've read, comment on Steven Spielberg being the director.  This is a guy
>who's made nothing but kiddie movies the last many years.  His fear-inspiring
>skills as in Jaws and Poltergeist have long gone.  He'll take a good plot,
>an adult plot, and turn it into Peter Pan.  Is there any hope?

I brought this same subject up a couple of months ago.  Back then
there were counter-arguments about "Color Purple" and "Empire of the
Sun", but he has also directed or produced a number of kid-focused
movies (as you mentioned).  What I worry about is that there are the
kids, Tim and Lex, in the Jurassic Park book.  I found Lex
particularly irritating in the book, and she fits into the typical
Spielberg-kid type of character.  I knew Spielberg was directing the
movie before I read the book, so I dreaded every passage in the book
where they concentrated on the kids.  Kids are particularly interested
in dinosaurs (I was when I was a kid), so the temptation to market the
movie to kids will be pretty strong.  Kids will identify with the Tim
and Lex characters.  There are also the cute baby velociraptors that could
be marketed as stuffed toys.

I hope I'm wrong.  The casting is a good indication so far.

--
_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_	_
 David Price			| " ... on a 36 year mission to the Crab
 Convex Computer Corp.		|   Nebula.  We've made this trip dozens
 dprice@convex.com		|   of times."
From: walker@Ingres.COM (Lynn Walker)
Subject: movie version of THE FUGITIVE?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Keywords: kimble vs. gerard
Organization: ASK Computer Systems, Ingres Product Division
Date: 15 Sep 92 18:51:12 GMT


I heard a while back that there was a planned movie based on the TV series
THE FUGITIVE. Originally Alec Baldwin was considered for the part of Richard
Kimble, but it fell through. I haven't heard anything since then.

My curiosity was stirred, as I wondereded how they would approach the story.

		-- Lynn --  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	Lynn Walker		Toronto, Canada		walker@ingres.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     "Nature, Mr. Allnut, is what we are put into this world to rise above"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Subject: Re: Fewest Actors in a Movie
Organization: AT&T
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 16:58:49 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.154955.12465@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> bjbartlett@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (The Bart-Man) writes:
>  What about "Robinson Crusoe on Mars"?  I've never seen the whole thing, 
>but in the parts I have seen, I just remember one man and a monkey.

There's also the alien he befriends (Friday), the guy at the beginning
in the other ship, the guy in the dream sequence, several extras that
played the slavers, etc..

GMS
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rchao@well.sf.ca.us (Robert Chao)
Subject: Altman
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 00:23:44 GMT


I have heard that Robert Altman is considered a god, almost. Is this
because MASH was revolutionary in its style? Is it because of other
achievements, like Nashville and McCabe and Mrs. Miller?
-- 
Robert Chao
Oakland, California
From: slib1602@altair.selu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: <None>
Date: 8 Sep 92 15:13:22 -0600
Reply-To: slib1602@selu.edu
Distribution: world
Organization: Southeastern Louisiana University

Is Pet Semetary 2 actually based on anything Steven King has ever written
or is it some producer's ideas?
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: matte lines around spaceships
Date: 13 Sep 92 20:05:43 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

In article <BuHx64.1It@well.sf.ca.us>, rchao@well.sf.ca.us (Robert Chao) writes:
 
> When I watch Star Trek (the original show) or even a tape of Empire 
> Strikes Back, I see extremely obvious lines around the ships, or in 
> the case of Empire, even the asteroids. That is, there is a rectangular 
> frame around each object that changes every few frames.

> Why are these lines so obvious on the tv screen but not noticeable
> on a film screen?

I really think it's time to add this question to the r.a.movies FAQ.
I've seen some good technical answers to this question, and it seems
to be something that puzzles alot of people.

Greg Bole                                         "Well ya killed the hell 
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu                       outa that fellow today."
                                                Clint Eastwood in _Unforgiven
From: peterme@ocf.berkeley.edu (Peter Merholz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: ENCHANTED APRIL is one of the years' best
Date: 9 Sep 1992 21:30:57 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
NNTP-Posting-Host: earthquake.berkeley.edu

I feel pretty comfortable in saying that ENCHANTED APRIL is one of the
best films released in America this year. I know that might not be saying
much, but I truly enjoyed this movie, far more than I enjoyed HOWARD'S END.
The acting is nearly flawless, with each character going through changes that
American actors would have trouble making believable. The direction is
subtle yet powerful, and definitely assisted by the gorgeous scenery. One
of the best aspects of this film, which usually doesn't work in cinema, was
the voice-overs that allowed us to hear what the characters were thinking...
This movie is a lot more complex and deep than it seems at first, and upon
reflection, the viewer understands just how much was crammed in there...

--Peter M.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis)
Subject: Re: Anthony Perkins: Aids: Died yesterday.
Keywords: aids,physcho
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 15:41:24 GMT
Organization: The Gizmonic Institute

Pat Steward writes:
>Peter Merholz writes:
>>
>>Does anyone say how he got the virus? I heard he had a wife and kids,
>>but as we know, that doesn't mean he wasn't gay or bi... Just curious...
>><Because I seriously doubt he received it in heterosexual union, considering
>>the odds against it... It would be unwise to further scare the heterosexual
>>population about AIDS since the odds are still phenomenally against
>>transmitting it heterosexually...>
>
>I'd be interested in knowing the source for this statement.

...particularly since it contradicts the African experience w/ the disease.

-- 
Coach Jeff Davis <davis@keats.ca.uky.edu> Season: 0-3 Lifetime: 0-5 
I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask you all to repent from your sins.
From: le01167@portal.lasc.lockheed.com (Ron Nadel (x2025))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Technical Criticisms of "Fail-Safe"
Date: 8 Sep 92 17:41:13 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Distribution: usa
Organization: Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Co. - Rye Canyon
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <6170@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil>, jxxl@taurus.cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke) writes...


> [much explaining, evidence, and discourse about the technical gaffs of
>   a 20+ year old so so book and movie mercifully deleted here]

>John

Hmm.  I didn't know that.

Ron
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: schumach@convex.com (Richard A. Schumacher)
Subject: Re: An annoying thing about Blade Runner
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 00:15:57 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.



>The movie is a story of this cop who has to kill these replicants
>who are all going to die in a week anyway.  Decker could have just
>sat in a Dunkin Donuts for a week until the replicant's life span
>ran out.  (Then, I suppose, we wouldn't have much of a movie, would we?).

Yep, this tears it: BR is a very pretty, but pretty stupid flick. 
Best to get really wasted before seeing it. Check brain at door.
And certainly don't waste any time arguing about any of its plot
devices. I'm outta here.



Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: uhschreg@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Ulrich Schreglmann)
Subject: Re: Movies you heard were good but sucked (was Re: Most Embarassing Movie)
Organization: Student Pool, CSD, University of Erlangen, Germany
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 15:43:30 GMT

gunnarh@dhhalden.no (GUNNAR HORRIGMO) writes:

>In article <1992Sep9.185510.26219@b23a.b23a.ingr.com> alfa@b23a.b23a.ingr.com (Laura Pina) writes:

>>Driving Miss Daisy (tried to watch it 3 times.  fell dead asleep w/in 20mins)
>Yup, Extremely boring.
Yeah, I can understand. No one gets killed. One even dies of natural
causes! What do they think they're selling us?
>>Batman
>H E Y, I thought that was cool!
Batman 2, maybe.
>>Naked Lunch (i think you have to be stoned to get it)
>Good idea, I'll try that sometime.
Come now! The insects were cooler than Giger's Alien! And the people
acted as cool as the characters of 2001. You have no taste!
>>People Under the Stairs (burn in HELLLL!)
>No, BUUUURRNN IN HEEELLLLLLLLL!!!!!!! 
>No, really, I haven't seen it.
BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-- Wait a moment -- nor have I.
>>Frankie & Johnny
Well, the sex scenes were very realistic, take it from someone who
knows. "I want to hear you, why can't I hear you!" Sheesh!
>>Sleepwalkers
>No, that's cool.
F/X a bit gratuitious, like in T2. Great to watch, though.
>>Pet Sematary (really, anything driven by a King tale)
>What's your thing against King?
Haven't seen it.
>>Family Plot (disappointing, cutesy Hitchcock)
>Wouldn't know.
Haven't seen it.
>>Tales from Grimly Hall 
>Never even heard of it.
Haven't seen it.
>>Angel Heart (come on....Louis Cipher?)
>Who is this guy anyway...I mean, everybody likes angel heart!
Include me.
>>that kinda new one w/blonde and michael douglas - i forget the name.
>>touted as erotic.  
>I agree, I too was going to post on that one, but we seem to have the same 
>problem, you and I. BTW that blonde one's called Sharon Stone.
You talking about Basic Instinct? If you're American, I can see why you
don't like it, because they censored the sex scenes. If you didn't like
it although you have seen the uncensored version, then you probably es-
caped from a cloister somewhere.


May the Cool Be with You!

(C)OOL mcmxcii
From: mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Highlander III.
Date: 8 Sep 92 09:16:58 GMT
Organization: DB and ES Subdivision, TU Vienna

From article <JEFFT.92Sep7235334@navigator.mit.edu>, by jefft@athena.mit.edu (Jeff Tang):
> In article <1992Sep8.014101.28079@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mblaser@nyx.cs.du.edu (Fox) writes:
>    I heard that in Highlander III a band of immortals who escaped the carnage
>    in Highlander I are woken up.  Turns out that they were accidentally
>    buried by a landslide/avalanche and have been sleeping all this time.

> Well, it already sounds better than highlander 2.

No, it's just as just as inconsistent with Highlander as Highlander 2
was.  (Unless they took their heads off before they went to sleep.  Or
perhaps they had them separated by the wonder surgeon from planet Fuzz
and now carry them around in their hands.)

Yes, it's sad.
-- 
Markus Stumptner                                mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
University of Technology Vienna                 vexpert!mst@relay.eu.net
Paniglg. 16, A-1040 Vienna, Austria             ...mcsun!vexpert!mst
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Jurassic Park and the Hurricane.
From: rivero@mdcbbs.com
Date: 14 Sep 92 10:01:39 GMT
Organization: Electronic Data Systems, Unigraphics Division, Cypress CA
Nntp-Posting-User: ferrara


  A contact of mine at Amblin reports that Steven Spielburg had just 
finished filming the Hawaiin portion of "Jurassic Park" when the hurricane 
blew through Kauai. The cast and crew were staying at the Westin Kauai (just 
a coconuts flight down the road from where I was married) and survived 
with few incidents. According to the report, Steven ventured outside during
the eye of the storm to admire the spectacular sky (having been through an
"eye" myself, I can understand this) while producer Kathleen Kennedy
stood in the doorway yelling at him to get back inside.



<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|  Michael Rivero        rivero@dev8j.mdcbbs.com     "A Human's Human!"  |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|                       I CAME,  I SAW,  I DIVORCED                      |
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: gene@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (Gene E. Johannsen)
Subject: Re: Holden's Eyes (was Re: Blade Runner...(SPOILERS))
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 20:55:47 GMT
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

steinman@me.utoronto.ca (David Steinman) writes:

>crunch@camelot.bradley.edu (Randy Bloom) writes:

>>That's like asking "why didn't character a know character b was going to do
>>that? didn't he read ahead?"  The eye-glowing thing is only a film device
>>to let the audience "know" who was or wasn't a replicant, and isn't
>>necessarily an accurate measure. 

>Wha??  Not an accurate measure?  If I saw anyone's eyes glow, I'd think
>something was up (or they got into the spice :-)  I have doubts about your
>interpretation; having replicants' eyes glow for the audience but not for
>the film's characters is lame.  You might as well have a subtitle which
>says "This is Holden; he is a replicant".
>--
>Dave!

No, because glowing eyes is not as blatant as a sub-title.  Glowing eyes,
if they are meant to identify a replicant, are not something you might
notice until you looked for them.  I believe they are clues for the
Bladerunner faithful.

gene
From: wwr@calmasd.prime.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 4 Sep 92 21:29:31 GMT
Organization: Computervision - A Division of Prime Computer

>    >    I used to work for the local theatres, so I saw a LOT of free movies.
>    >Only three times did I get up and leave, even though I wasn't paying for
>    >the flick: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles; Russkies; and Career 
>    >Opprotunities. Russkies was just plain dumb, and the other two I
>    >considered insulting to my intelligence.
>    >                                     Lyle

	Uh, what is your IQ, anyway?  Just wondering, so I can have some frame
of reference here.

>    >
>    >--
> 
>    You didn't like PT&A?? The rental-car-counter scene with Steve Martin's
>    blood-pressure-exploding monolog is a classic. MOre than once I've been
>    at a rental-car counter and had his whole dialog race thru my brain. 
>    Candy and Martin were a great complimentary "buddy" team. It's definitely
>    my favorite John Hughes film. Have it on tape and have probably watched
>    it a dozen times. Ah well... it's wonderful to see all these 
>    completely contrary analyses of the same film. 
>    Harv
> 
> I expect that how much one appreciates PT&A is a direct function of
> how much travelling one has done.  I'll never forget the time I had to
> fly from National, via Dallas, to El Paso and spent the night in
> Chicago.  With no spare shirt.  Or the time (on my honeymoon, yet)
> when United Airlines cancelled our Hertz rental car reservation (did
> you know they could do that?  I didn't).  Or the 3-day Vermont trip on
> which it took the airline 2 days to get my fishing rod to me after
> they found it...
> 
> -Joe.

	I have a traveling tale also (happened during the Gulf War), but can't
top that one... my condolances; you have the suckiest traveling story I've ever
heard :0oooh may!

walter
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: tcw@kepler.unh.edu (Timothy C Webb)
Subject: Re: movie with 'blows' in the title?
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 01:33:35 GMT

In article <1992Sep8.192944.346@athena.mit.edu> brian@mtl.mit.edu (brian foley) writes:
>
>This is for a puzzle I'm doing...
>The puzzle requires me to find out the number in a movie title
>with the word 'blows' in it. (ie. 'seven blows' or something
>like that).
>
>any takers?

"Seven Blows of the Dragon"!

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    Tim Webb             |     tcw@kepler.unh.edu                          |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  "I wouldn't worry about it, Mrs. Brady. With the songs the way they are  |
|   nowadays you can't hear the words well enough to understand that what   |
|   you would have heard is something you wouldn't have understood anyway"  |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rmichl@iiic.ethz.ch (Robert Michl)
Subject: Re: A question about Die Hard (or Wild at Heart?)
Organization: Dept. Informatik, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, CH
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 20:40:57 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.115756.25707@abo.fi> KJOHNSSON@finabo.abo.fi (Kim-Erik Johnsson INF) writes:
>I'm posting this message for a friend...
>
>Is there a scene like described below in Die Hard:
[...]
>...the terrorist comes alive again, only to die a few seconds later due to
>multiple head injuries because Bruce has been banging it on the stairs
>or the railings (?) or something like that.
>
>My friend says he's positive that's what happened. My copy doesn't have any
>scene like that, nor do I remember ever having seen it. He especially said he
>enjoyed the soundeffects that came with the 'headbanging'...
>
>So, anyone know for sure?!?
>
>I know the terrorist's brother gets his head banged later in the movie, but
>this isn't the scene I mean...
>

Try David Lynchs "Wild at Heart", where Sailor bangs the head of his
opponent against the stairs. I loved the Headbanger-Music of "Powermad"
in this scene ====:-)

		Robert Michl

		(rmichl@iiic.ethz.ch)

*****************************************************************
->My mother's name is Margaret (like the log Lady)
->We call Dad Carl (that was Fat Trout Trailer Park Guard)
->He's a Twin
->My brother's called Dennis (remember Denise Bryson?)
->We're Twins
->I'm BOB
->and my sister - guess what ? - Laura!
Well, the last names have been changed to protect the innocent...
*****************************************************************

BTW, to find out more 'bout Lynchs "Fire Walk With Me" drop an eye into
alt.tv.twin-peaks ;-)
From: michaell@cogs.susx.ac.uk (Michael Lazarou)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Highlander III.
Date: 8 Sep 92 11:26:00 GMT
Organization: University of Sussex at Brighton
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

Per Knudsgaard (knude@daimi.aau.dk) wrote:

:    MTV Europe's The Big Picture featured a short interview with Christofer
: Lambert about HIGHLANDER III. I tumbled into the interview towards the
: end(ZAP), so if there is anything wrong with the following - beyond the fact
: that they are making a followup to HIGHLANDER II, the sickening - I
: appologize.
:
:    As said, it was towards the end and there was little with substance in
: what
: I heard. He said that "they" realized that H.II was bad, and that the
: approach this time was more like H.I. In his view that means less fireworks,
: and more story. I heard nothing about the shooting schedule, and have no
: idea if they have started, or when it will be released.


Fox (mblaser@nyx.cs.du.edu) wrote:
: You're gonna love this
:
: I heard that in Highlander III a band of immortals who escaped the carnage
: in Highlander I are woken up.  Turns out that they were accidentally
: buried by a landslide/avalanche and have been sleeping all this time.  Well
: they get lose and thus is spawned more hack, slash and general maiming
: action
:
: Sad isn't it


I can't believe that this is true. Christopher Lambert being quoted as saying
that Highlander III was going to be more like Highlander I but someome
please tell me that the plot is not going to be loads of immortals rampaging
about. What time period is this set in anyway?

How can a bunch of immortals "accidentally" get buried by an avalanche? If
this is what its going to be then its going to be just like Alien3 and ruin
the previous films.

Conor McCloud is the only immortal on Earth so he gets his prize but oops, we
forgot about all those other immortals who got smegged by an avalanche whilst
on their skiing holiday so hes got to fight again.

AAAAARRRGH! Someone please tell me this isn't true.

If they are going to do a third film they should base it on the ending of the
first when Conor says that he can hear peoples thoughts and stuff. He also
said that he could have kids so maybe Highlander III will be Son of
Highlander, The one we forgot to tell you about in the second film.

--
INSSOMNIAK
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies