HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Bis)
Subject: Re: Testttttt!
Organization: Bis Information Services
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 14:35:13 GMT

In article <1992Sep5.015437.14111@hubcap.clemson.edu> bchapma@hubcap.clemson.edu (Brant Jason Chapman) writes:
>Since spelling and grammar flames are for pussies (a.k.a. feminists and
>losers in alt.flame) I'll concentrate on finer points. I must admit
>that my first impulse was to throw peanuts at you rather than flame you,
>but that wouldn't be any fun you son of an unnamed goat. Simply put :
>You suck,your mother sucks, and your sister would've sucked but I didn't
>have five dollars. Ordinarily, when I think of a troll, I think of a monster
>who hides under bridges and attacks passers by. I would guess that to be a much
>more noble hobby than yours :  clinking icecubes together and vomiting on
>yourself....although I must admit, your post was more entertaining than many
>in recent months...none of the di
>(excuse me,lost my train of thought, and my sperm in your mothers mouth)
>none of the "did...did not" crap propigated by lefty and darcy and gritzner
>that has been boring me to tears lately...BTW anyone want to place bets that
>their average iq is lower than their average penis size in inches ?
>...as for "fuck-you-very-much" I don't think so, I have a headache and good
>taste,so go find some other 4 legged creature "jag"
>
>                                        Brant
>"You don't go to college to be talkin' to no bitches. Your black ass
>
>
>
>supposed to be learnin' somethin'. you ain't never gonna learn shit talkin to
>
>
>no stupid ass bitch"-Doughboy (Ice Cube) "Boyz in the Hood"        
>
> W

Would someone please send out a control message for
alt.stupid.putz.brant-chapman?

Xref: sparky alt.flame:12607 talk.abortion:35481 alt.fan.kevin-darcy:394
From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Date: 8 Sep 92 01:19:20 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise


in a post that sounds, i think, that he is positively
glowing from the attention he begged for and received,

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) writes:

-> >Hahahahaha!  Why look at this -- it's Mr
-> >Subjectivity pontificating on a subject he once
-> >spent three months denying even existed!
-> 
-> No, dear, I never denied the existence of
-> objectivity in general. 

is this another of those matters like kevin darcy, the
GROUP and kevin darcy, the INDIVIDUAL?

-- 
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (exuptr@exu.ericsson.se)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Fuck You, Hugo
Date: 10 Sep 92 23:04:38 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.

In article <bazyar.716153445@teal> bazyar@teal.csn.org (Jawaid Bazyar) writes:
>avik@icase.edu (Avik Banerjee) writes:

>>a)     hugo, you are a moron... 
>>d)     hugo, you are a moron.

>  Redundant, but oh so correct.

Me, too ;-)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "This must be Thursday.  I never could get the hang of Thursdays"
                                                       - Douglas Adams
  - Patrick Taylor                                       (Arthur Dent)
    Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                       "Don't let the .se fool you"
    or exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org, exu.exuptr@memo.ericsson.se
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu (John G. Robinson)
Subject: Re: Tales From the Crypt
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 15:31:34 GMT
X-Posted-From: psy7.psy.utexas.edu
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <oops!*giggle*iforgot@crd.ge.com>, keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James
G Keegan Jr) writes:

> ...i just...keep working at it...
> failure...i...needs to be rescued.

No, of course that's not at all what you wrote.  Of course, you typed the
actual words (sans ellipses) but it's not what you _meant_, is it?  Just
demonstrating that you don't have a corner-market on selective quotation or
misleading rhetoric.  Hell, it's been the meat and potatoes of lawyers and
politicians for thousands of years; you just don't have quite as good a
handle on it as most of them do.

Seriously, now:

In article <1992Sep4.012131.2870@crd.ge.com>, keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James
G Keegan Jr) writes:
> 
> robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu (John G. Robinson) writes:
 
> -> While "openly begging for attention" would have been
> ->_extremely_ relevant
> 
> isn't that what i just suggested?
> [...]
> -> what I was actually going for was sarcasm.
> 
> keep working at it. don't let failures

[read: censorship]

> like this discourage you.
> 
> -> So, tell me, how long have you had these
> -> knight-in-shining-armor delusions?
> 
> naughty, naughty. you're supposed to do your own
> homework before you foolishly post.
> 

From what I've seen of you, I'll take that to mean that you've had this
problem your entire life.  Sad, really.  I thought it might have been due
to some trauma during your adolescence.  No doubt you favor the submissive
role in your bondage dabblings...

> ->  Would you have been so quick to come to the rescue,
> -> in a thread that you have heretofore had nothing to
> -> do with, if my target had been, say, Mr.  Solberg?
> 
> get serious. from what i've seen of you, i don't think
> anyone needs to be rescued.
> 

I am serious.  I never had to put up with you before, and I would have
liked to keep it that way; unfortunately, your weak little foray into this
thread has made that problematic.

Allow me to clue you in on a little secret:  Trish is _not_ going to make a
road trip to jump your bones simply because you come in on her behalf in a
side-thread in alt.flame.  If you're trying for something like this, it
might behoove you to go back to IRC where you belong.

Your "friends" in the abortion debate do not value you; they suffer you. 
They do it because, like a parasite, you are adequately adept at scraping
off the barnacles.  Incapable as you are at attempting a worthwhile
argument, you are nevertheless valuable to them as a sort of pool-sweeping
bacterium which will rid them of petty nuisances while they go on with more
important work.  They are secretly ashamed of you, my good man, yet they
cannot relinquish the convenience of using you.

> -- 
> ----
> charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.

Ah.  Those Sick About the Knights of Columbus?  Another blackball, I
assume.  'Tis all startin' to make a bit o' sense now, Jimmy-boy.

**********
John G. Robinson
robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu
From: johnl@yang.earlham.edu (John Fiskio-Lasseter)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Fuck You All
Date: 11 Sep 92 20:26:07 GMT
Organization: Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana

In article <1992Sep10.022440.26445@usage.csd.unsw.OZ.AU>, 2120158@hydra.maths.unsw.EDU.AU writes:
> In article <BuAowu.A4v@well.sf.ca.us> hugoglez@well.sf.ca.us (Hugo Gonzalez) writes:
>>I have received a lot of flame mail for what I said in response to Jeff.
>>I thoght I should clear up some misconceptions.
>>
>>I do not think all black people are "niggers". 
>   I do, but then again I also call aboriginies Abo's- no offense intended,
> to me it's just like a nickname.

Just curious, Matthew:  what is the connotation of that term in Australia? 
This is a serious question, 'cause here in the US, it's use is generally a 
just cause for getting squashed.  Not that you'll ever read this post in 
the flurry of screaming that's currently going on.

--John 

Followup directed to alt.flame, by the way.  PLEASE WATCH WHERE YOU SEND 
THE FOLLOWUPS ON THIS THREAD!!!!  
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
|John Howard Eli Fiskio-Lasseter  |     "Is obair-la\ to\iseachadh"   |
|e-mail: johnl@yang.earlham.edu   |    ("Beginning is a day's work")  |
|        JOHNL@EARLHAM.BITNET     |                --Gaidhlig Proverb |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (exuptr@exu.ericsson.se)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Who is Kevin Darcy & why hate him so?
Date: 13 Sep 92 21:40:53 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.

In article <exuptr.531.716420379@exu.ericsson.se> exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (exuptr@exu.ericsson.se) writes:
>In article <1992Sep13.102556.9766@news.cs.brandeis.edu> bis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Bis) writes:
>>Prove that I'm either or
>>both.  After all, you're the one that insists that the definition of a
>>liar is someone who makes a statement and can't prove it later...

>>Okay, your turn.  I eagerly await to laugh when I see you respond with
>>out of context quotations that don't answer the question anyway.

>You suppose that chip on his shoulder is a 486?  ;-)

Or is it just a piece of a falling rock?
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "This must be Thursday.  I never could get the hang of Thursdays"
                                                       - Douglas Adams
  - Patrick Taylor                                       (Arthur Dent)
    Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                       "Don't let the .se fool you"
    or exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org, exu.exuptr@memo.ericsson.se
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 23:42:04 GMT

In article <Bu73L1.8MH@world.std.com> rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) writes:
>In  <1992Sep2.004534.18788@cfctech.cfc.com>  kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>> The same comment applies. You demonstrate pitifully-limited powers of
>> extrapolation and/or objectivity.
>
>Hahahahaha!  Why look at this -- it's Mr Subjectivity pontifi-
>cating on a subject he once spent three months denying even
>existed!

No, dear, I never denied the existence of objectivity in general. What I
denied was that YOU, specifically, applied perfect objectivity when deciding
whether a given law was good or bad. And, apparently, you STILL don't 
understand the difference between those two assertions. Ignoramus.

								- Kevin
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: K. Cochran & homophobia
Keywords: homophobe, homophobia, Keith Cochran
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 04:18:07 GMT

In article <l9a45vINNdig@news.bbn.com> levin@bbn.com (Joel B Levin) writes:
>stu5s14@bcrka287.bnr.ca (James Cherry) writes:
>|Keith,
> . . .
>|Kevin Darcy then responded in <1992Aug14.070559.4635@rotag.mi.org>:
>
>|>Then why do you spew homophobic shit that ranks with the Artimus Pages and
>|>Phil Stromers and Danny Karneses of the world?
>
>|To which you submitted article <1992Aug21.003643.3975@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>:
>
>|>I love it.  I make a half-assed description of anal sex, Kevin calls me a
>|>homophobe, and rather then admitting his mistake attempts to equate me with
>|>Artimus, Phil, and Danny.
>
>|   I submit that it is ENTIRELY REASONABLE from your posts to accuse you of
>|being homophobic, as Kevin Darcy contended, because:
>
>(Many lines of pseudological (actually darcylogical) logorrhea removed.)
>
>|I didn't see the whole of the original post which your second quotation
>|above comes from, so it may be out of context.
>
>No kidding.
>
>If you had taken your time and looked around instead of jumping in
>feet first with your eyes shut, you might have known something about
>Keith so you might understand that he is not a homophobe.
>
>Here's an additional clue: the references to anal sex are intended for
>homophobes like kevin [...]

Huh? "Homophobes like Kevin"? Where on earth do you get this impression,
Levin? Certainly not from anything I've written...

Or is this just another instance of those "I hate Kevin. I hate X. Therefore 
Kevin must be an X" logical fallacies, with X in this case being "homophobe", 
instead of the usual run-of-the-mill "pro-lifer" or "fascist" or "racist"?

I think I'll show this article to some of my gay confidantes. I'm sure they'll
get a big laugh out of it...

								- Kevin
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: Who is Kevin Darcy & why hate him so?
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 03:26:46 GMT

In article <BuGxDB.222@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM> jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods) writes:
>In <1992Sep9.185749.27407@nrtpa038.bnr.ca> Sparky writes:
>>As a "Newbie Geek" to alt.flame, I've read several disparaging and downright
>>rude comments directed toward one Kevin "Kebbin" Darcy.  What gives?  Why is he
>>so despised?  Is he dispicable?  Should I despise him, too?
>
>Assuming you're on a UNIX system, simply grep for "cfctech.cfc.com" and "rotag"
>in /usr/lib/news/history, read all his articles, then read the articles he's
>responding to (and note the astonishing difference between what they say and
>what he understands them to have said), and you can make up your own mind.

Can you give a concrete example, Johnny, or are we just supposed to take your
word on this?

								- Kevin
From: masuda@fcs280b.ncifcrf.gov (Michiaki Masuda)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: bionet.bionette or bionet.women ?
Date: 12 Sep 92 00:20:30 GMT
Organization: Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center

In article <1992Sep10.005039.16043@ncsu.edu> samodena@csemail.cropsci.ncsu.edu (S. A. Modena) writes:
>In article <3869@fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov> masuda@fcs280b.ncifcrf.gov (Michiaki Masuda) writes:
.....
>>  Anyway, let's wait for the result of the vote.
>                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.....

>This may be an error:
.....
>  I heard no call that the name would go
>according to a "vote" (i.e. be that name which had a majority or
>purality).

 Welcome to the democracy!

Michiaki Masuda
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12651 news.groups:17719 rec.music.misc:22966 rec.music.gdead:16175
From: fromm@tecrus.enet.dec.com ("Rich Fromm - 'Whatever you do, take care of your shoes.'  09-Sep-1992 1001")
Newsgroups: alt.culture,alt.flame,news.groups,rec.music.misc,rec.music.gdead
Subject: STOP THIS NOW!!! (was Re: Fuck You All)
Date: 9 Sep 92 13:55:24 GMT
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA27443; Wed, 9 Sep 92 06:55:26 -0700
X-Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA28003; Wed, 9 Sep 92 06:55:24 -0700
X-Received: from tecrus.enet; by decwrl.enet; Wed, 9 Sep 92 06:55:24 PDT
X-To: "rec.music.gdead.usenet""nm%decwrl::\"rec.music.misc.usenet\" nm%decwrl::\"news.groups.usenet\" nm%decwrl::\"alt.flame.usenet\" nm%decwrl::\"alt.culture.usenet\""
X-Apparently-To: alt.culture.usenet, alt.flame.usenet, news.groups.usenet,

X-        rec.music.misc.usenet, rec.music.gdead.usenet

Ordinarily I wouldn't post a response to a posting like this, but due to the
fact that the initial posting was cross-posted to so many different groups, I
feel that a response is warranted.  I worry that if I simply ignore this flame
(like I usually do to most flames) it isn't going to go away that easily.

I don't care to take part in this bigoted debate.  All I ask is that you get
this debate off of rec.music.phish.  I don't like to speak for a large group
of people without their consent, but I feel fairly confident in saying that
the vast majority of readers of rec.music.phish don't want this bullshit
being discussed there.  So if anybody wants to continue this discussion in
an appropriate newsgroup (not that I think that there is an appropriate
newsgroup for this discussion), feel free to do so.  But I politely request
that all future replies remove the cross posting to rec.music.phish.

- Rich Fromm
From: rperkins@astro.as.arizona.edu (Rachel J. Perkins)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Sad Losers!
Date: 8 Sep 92 15:56:21 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

In article <1992Sep7.150700.20010@cs.nott.ac.uk> nlc@vulcan.xtel.co.uk (Neil Cook) writes:
>My God, alt.angst - says it all really.

well, yes. so what's your point? it's been said. hardly an original comment.

bah.

--
		-just give me what for,
	rachel perkins =  rperkins@astro.as.arizona.edu
      "Chastity..the most unnatural of all the sexual perversions...."
					-Aldous Huxley
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
From: rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama)
Subject: Re: And Now, You're A Coatrack!! Was: without even being asked ....
Followup-To: news.net-cops.kevin-darcy
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 06:44:21 GMT

In article <1992Sep3.043259.3738@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) sucks up to Franklin:

>Oh, I see, you were desperate to flame Franklin, and all you could manage was 
>this lame, tenuous connection to his age. Leading-digit flames. Impressive.

Is this the same Kevin Darcy who has been whining for the past year
about sycophants and toadies?

Ah, Kevie, you're such a fucking hypocrite.





----------
Then find another newsgroup. We believe in -flaming- here; clubbiness and
solidarity make us retch. 
					Kevin Darcy
					<1991Apr7.173516.5900@rotag.uucp>
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12725 talk.abortion:36030
From: kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Date: 11 Sep 92 00:59:23 GMT
Organization: Chrysler Financial Corp., Southfield, MI

In article <BuAppq.6t9@world.std.com> rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) writes:
>In article <1992Sep7.234204.16721@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>>No, dear, I never denied the existence of objectivity in general. What I
>
>Yes, you did, Kevin. 

Prove it.

							- Kevin
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: gilgalad@sparky.eecs.umich.edu (Ralph Seguin)
Subject: Re: Fuck You All
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 20:02:59 GMT

>>In article <BuAowu.A4v@well.sf.ca.us> hugoglez@well.sf.ca.us (Hugo Gonzalez) writes:
>>>accepted as FACT in the scientific community.  If you don't belive me,

Ahhhh... FACTs?  Show me ONE paper written in a real scientific
method that supports this load of shit.  Not any papers written by
your fucking KKK friends either.  Oh, wait, they can write?

Here is a real fact:
Minorities in the USA are NOT presented with equal rights as the
law says.  Things ranging from constant biggotry from assholes like
you and institutionalized racism are always working to oppress
their rights.

Those who spout such nonsense are no doubt full of feelings of
inferiority and can only "prove" their theories by spouting such
crap.

I forget who wrote it, but I'll paraphrase anyhow:

"The mind of the biggot is like the iris of the eye ;  The more light
you shine upon it, the smaller it becomes."

(I want to say Sam Clemens, but I can't be sure.  I saw it in somebody's
sig once, and I liked it.)
From: msmiller@Rational.COM (Mark Miller)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: The world according to propeller-boy - part 1
Date: 8 Sep 92 17:36:48 GMT
Organization: Rational

In article <1992Sep5.205530.10799@rotag.mi.org>, kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
lict the thread on talk.abortion
|> 
|> [...]   
|> 
|> So Susie is not the pure-as-the-driven-snow maiden-in-the-tower innocent
|> victim she would like to believe she is. She used my mistake, and the feelings 
|> of her SO, as a staging ground to pursue a long and bitter vendetta she has 
|> with me. Pretty reprehensible, if you ask me, to exploit a child abuse victim
|> like that.
|> 
|> 								- Kevin

... You are enterring the Twilight Zone ...

Geeeeezuz.
________________________________________________________________________
Mark S. Miller                                     msmiller@Rational.COM
"Life is a 4-letter word."                        msmiller@world.std.com
[ insert tedious disclaimer drivel here ]                           IV-Q
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: Wow (was Re: The world according to propeller-boy - part 1)
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 19:53:39 GMT

In article <5669@igor.Rational.COM> msmiller@Rational.COM (Mark Miller) writes:
>In article <2aa65900.crud@crud.mn.org>, trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz) writes:
>|> In article <Bts4st.HGx@world.std.com>
>|>         rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) writes:
>|> 
>|> ]>	 Thing is, Dear Mr.
>|> ]>Miller, that virtually all of the folks who have at one time or another
>|> ]>claimed I've been "not worth the trouble" have either shortly thereafter
>|> ]>disappeared from the face of the Net
>|> ]
>|> ]Like who for instance?
>|> 
>|> I suppose he means T*d.  T*d said that once or twice, after Kebbin
>|> had supposedly destroyed him.

Where and when did I say this? Or are you making shit up again?

I _do_ remember calling Trish on her cowardice/complacency in not attacking
him, but I never claimed to have "destroyed him" [sic].

							- Kevin
From: yost@adobe.com (David Yost)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: QOI= Proposed Subject Line key letters
Date: 14 Sep 92 21:12:05 GMT
Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated

Ladies and Gentlemen of alt.flame,

Are you sick and tired of reading net messages that
you hoped would give you information, only to find that
they are only asking information (that you can't answer
anyway), or rambling on with discussion that doesn't
answer the simple factual question that was asked?

I had an idea the other day regarding Usenet postings
that I would like to discuss with my esteamed (sick) [sic]
colleagues on the net.  This is why I am addressing
this august (dis?) group of experienced and concerned Usenet
denizens.  Rather than start a discussion that would no
doubt quickly lead here, I thought I would cut through
the red tape and just start the discussion here.

The idea is simply this: use a short list of standard
key letters to describe the content of a message.
The subject line begins with a collection of the
appropriate key letters, followed by "= ".  If it is a
reply, then it should also be followed by "Re: " and
then the original key letter markers.

Think of the filters we could make if usage became
widespread!

    Subject key
    -----------
    Describe the content of the message using all that apply
    in the order listed here
      * Urgency of information flow
	  T timely, relates to an event about to happen
	     followed immediately by mmdd [hh:mm]
      * Direction of information flow (one or more)
	  Q question, request
	  A answer
      * Kind of information (one or more)
	  F factual--believed by poster to be incontrovertible
	  O opinions, discussion, etc.
	  I ideas, proposals, etc.
	  H history
	  P predictions
	  M meta-discussion, incl. flame
	  Z something about this message falls outside the standard
	    set of keyletters

    Examples:
    -----------
      ba.seminars
	   TF: 0916 19:30 Dave Yost will talk on blah blah
      comp.lang.lisp
	   QF: Scheme under CL
		 Is there a ...
      alt.flame
	   OM: flaming flamers
      alt.spacemen
	   P: visitors from Mars
	   QF: visitors from Mars
	   F: visitors from Mars
		(which ones would you read?)

I'd like to try this out for a while on some newsgroup
and see how it goes.  After, of course, you have all had
a chance to scorch it, trample on it, bugger it, or even
improve on it.

 --dave
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Subject: Re: Fuck You All
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 20:52:46 GMT

oh, god, the hugo blast made it on this one, too?

i hope that you will all ignore it and not respond.  allegedly this
is a security breach at the well.  speaking as one from the
dead.net, who has been wading through this dreck for DAYS now (Seems
like eons), i can tell you that if you respond, this will generate
about 300 messages.  Altho there were about 108 waiting when i came
into this, and probably 50 of them are in response to hugo.

if his security was really breached, we'll know because we'll
probably never hear from him again (terminal embarrassment).  on
the ohter hand, if he really *is* such a dick, then i guess we can
respond to the future posts that are GUARANTEED to be issued from
him.

do yourself a favor and kill (file) it all.

--> arrow -->