HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: RICK@ysub.ysu.edu (Rick Marsico)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.script-l
Subject: Re: Waterloo Script and INLINE page segments
Date: 15 Oct 92 17:20:33 GMT
Organization: Youngstown State University

In article <1688181A1.RICK@ysub.ysu.edu>
RICK@ysub.ysu.edu (Rick Marsico) writes:
 
>
>I am encountering problems with inline page segments under Waterloo Script
>90.1 in both the vm/cms and mvs environments.  Under cms, the segment
>will be properly processed by SFCM only when the SEnd option is included
>on the PSF command.  When '.si AAAA inline' is specified in the SCRIPT
>routine (where AAAA is the name of a page segment with a file type of
>PSEG3820), the following message is received back from SFCM:
>APRFFI349S page segment AAAA PSEG38PP was not found.
>
 
I think I've discovered the problem.  It appears that the release 90.1
I3820 postprocessor cannot handle images created by the IBM IHF V2.1.2
utility.  The script I3820 processor flags the image as containing
invalid data and thus forces the NOSEGLIB option.  If I edit the
PSEG3820 graphic segment and remove the comment inserted by IHF on the
second line (which contains IHF version information), everything
works fine.
 
Rick Marsico
rick@ysu.edu
From: A024021@RUTVM1.BITNET (Russ Donhauser)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.script-l
Subject: Putting footnotes at the end
Date: 16 Oct 92 16:54:26 GMT
              <SCRIPT-L@RICEVM1.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

greetings,
 Is there anyway to place the footnotes in  an article at the end
of the article?  A user wants all the references to other articles
to be superscripted and numbered but to be placed at the end.
Footnote may not be the best way and I am open to anything that
is similar.

thanks in advance

Russ Donhauser        RUTGERS, The State University of New Jersey
From: JOEUSER@NUACVM.ACNS.NWU.EDU (Joe User)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.script-l
Subject: CMS Script -> listing format. How?
Date: 7 Oct 92 14:54:11 GMT
Organization: Northwestern University

Hi,
   Easy question.  I'm on CMS using SCRIPT/VS release 3.2.  I
have a script file I want to convert to plain old 'listing' format
to print on my Xerox laser printer.  I have the script book out,
but I'm in a hurry... Thanks much.  T.S.
 
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.script-l
From: RICK@ysub.ysu.edu (Rick Marsico)
Subject: Waterloo Script and INLINE page segments
Organization: Youngstown State University
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 13:13:05 GMT

I am encountering problems with inline page segments under Waterloo Script
90.1 in both the vm/cms and mvs environments.  Under cms, the segment
will be properly processed by SFCM only when the SEnd option is included
on the PSF command.  When '.si AAAA inline' is specified in the SCRIPT
routine (where AAAA is the name of a page segment with a file type of
PSEG3820), the following message is received back from SFCM:
APRFFI349S page segment AAAA PSEG38PP was not found.
 
In editing the output generated by script with the I3820 option, the
requested segment is inline, however, SFCM is not recognizing its
existence.  Anyone encounter this problem?
 
Rick Marsico
rick@ysu.edu
From: PCZBH@CUNYVM.BITNET (Willie Sanchez)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.script-l
Subject: Re: Putting footnotes at the end
Date: 16 Oct 92 18:43:47 GMT
              <SCRIPT-L@RICEVM1.BITNET>
Organization: Student Information Management System/CUNY
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

It seems to me what you want is the :EN. and :eEN. tags in Waterloo Script
GML (Generalized Markup Language).  The definition is as follows:

"A footnote is that which comes at the bottom (foot) of something.  An endnote
is that which comes as the end of something.  Endnotes are created in much the
same way as footnotes.  The :EN tag defines the start of the endnote text
block, and the :eEN tag defines the end."

You control the positioning of the endnotes by using the :ENDNOTES tag.  Any
already defined endnotes will be printed at that point in the document and
endnote numbering will resume 1 for the first endnote defined thereafter.  If
you do not include an :ENDNOTES tag, SCRIPT will automatically print them at
the end of your document.

Of course, the above information assumes that you use GML (and you should).

------------------------------
Willie Sanchez  (PCZBH@CUNYVM)
City University of New York
Management Information Systems
555 West 57th Street
New York, New York 10019
(212) 541-0309
From: URDB@MARIST.BITNET (Duane Beyer)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.script-l
Subject: Re: Waterloo Script and INLINE page segments
Date: 15 Oct 92 20:55:11 GMT
              <SCRIPT-L@RICEVM1.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

On Thu, 15 Oct 1992 13:13:05 GMT (Rick Marsico) said:
>I am encountering problems with inline page segments under Waterloo Script
>90.1 in both the vm/cms and mvs environments.  Under cms, the segment
>will be properly processed by SFCM only when the SEnd option is included
>on the PSF command.  When '.si AAAA inline' is specified in the SCRIPT
>routine (where AAAA is the name of a page segment with a file type of
>PSEG3820), the following message is received back from SFCM:
>APRFFI349S page segment AAAA PSEG38PP was not found.
>
>In editing the output generated by script with the I3820 option, the
>requested segment is inline, however, SFCM is not recognizing its
>existence.  Anyone encounter this problem?
>


CMS ENVIRONMENT
I have also had this same problem. I just send the segmant with the
PSF command PAGES(fn ft fm )SE when I print the file. Have not had
had a chance to look into this in anymore detail yet.

Duane



>Rick Marsico
>rick@ysu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:        UK.AC.LEEDS.GPS; 12 OCT 92 13:05:26 BST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Mon, 12 Oct 1992 13:03:37 BST
Reply-To:     amt5man@SUN.LEEDS.AC.UK
From:         amt5man@SUN.LEEDS.AC.UK
Subject: Re: Rulebook changes

S91K9@edu.uscolo.starburst wrote:

> After spending a good deal of itme comparing the 1982 rules to the 1976 rules,
> there are only 2 differences that I noticed.

> 1.)  in section XII

>    5.  A CONVOYED ATTACK DOES NOT CUT CERTAIN SUPPORTS.  If a convoyed army
> attacks a fleet which is supporting an action in a body of water; and that
> body of water contains a convoying fleet, that support is not cut.


This is different from what Jamie stated some time ago, where he said
that *any* support was not cut.  This definitely makes more sense.



>    6. BOTH A CONVOY AND AN OVERLAND ROUTE.  If an army could arrive at its
> destination either overland or by convoy, one route must be considered and the
> other disregarded, depending upon the intent as shown by the totality of the
> orders written by the player governing the army.


   This isn't perfectly clear: if the player doesn't show any intent does this
mean he's moving by land?  This would have to be covered in someone's HRs.

Mark
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Thu, 15 Oct 1992 10:47:39 EST
Reply-To:     Tony Dugdale <CXAD@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA>
From:         Tony Dugdale <CXAD@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA>
Subject:      coasts

I feel silly asking what seems like such an obvious
question, but I've lost my rulebook and I just can't
remember.  Can a fleet support an action on a
coast it does not touch?  Answer seems clearly "no"
but what about the following situation:

F Gas S Mar-Spa(sc)
F Mar-Spa(sc)
    OR
F Fin S Bar-StP(nc)
F Bar-StP(nc)

Is this valid?  My heart says yes but my head says no ...

Tolara
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Mon, 12 Oct 1992 17:47:00 +0100
Reply-To:     Lars Henrik Mathiesen <thorinn@DIKU.DK>
From:         Lars Henrik Mathiesen <thorinn@DIKU.DK>
Subject:      Rulebook changes
              12 Oct 1992 13:03:37 BST <9210121206.AA05119@odin.diku.dk>

I have not been able to find my old rulebook, but I believe that there
is one more change in the 1982 rules, compared to the way I was taught
to play:

  XII.4, MORE THAN ONE CONVOY ROUTE. If the orders as written permit
    more than one route by which the convoyed army could proceed from
    its source to its destination, the order is not void on account of
    this ambiguity; and *the army is not prevented* from moving due to
    dislodgement of fleets, *unless all the routes are disrupted*.

By the rules I thought I knew, any dislodgment of a convoying fleet
disrupts the convoy --- provided that some possible convoy route does
in fact use the dislodged fleet. Good, clean fun can be had(*).
Relative to this, the current rule vastly diminishes the effect of the
unwanted *extra* convoy.

What's more, I believe that the ``new'' rule could be extended to
cover the case addressed in the new XII.6, where a convoy and a land
route both exist: If all convoy routes are disrupted, the army moves
by land, and can be resisted by an opposite movement; otherwise, it
moves by sea. I am not sure how good such a rule would be for the game
(it probably does not matter much), but it appeals to my sense of
logic.

As I read XII.6, by the way, a player does not need to indicate his
intent explicitly, and no default can be imposed in the absence of
such an indication; the GM must decide *from context* whether the
player wanted a convoy or not. In an unmoderated game, the players
must reach a consensus on this question!

_________________________________
(*) Playing, say, Noble England, you suspect that the treacherous
Frogs are going to dislodge you from the Channel while the evil Krauts
plan to convoy an army from Belgium to London. Just let your fleet
``help'' the convoy, and enjoy the expression on their faces if you
guessed right. (If they should prove less predictable in their low
tactics, you have lost nothing.)

Lars Mathiesen (U of Copenhagen CS Dep) <thorinn@diku.dk> (Humour NOT marked)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original-From: globe1!smc (Stephen Mcfeeley +1 908 949 0554)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Fri, 16 Oct 1992 08:46:00 EDT
Reply-To:     globe1!smc@EREBUS.ATT.COM
From:         globe1!smc@EREBUS.ATT.COM
Subject:      Re: How to contact Nick

Dear Nick ,

Could you take me off the DIP-L mailinging list.

unsubscribe doesn't work because it has a different address than I
I have now. The mail I get is forwarded from erebus and I am on globe1
now. I can't log onto the old erebus machine because it is now defuct.
I would much appreciate this as my mail is getting much too big. I
can only imagine how big yours is. Thanks

Stephen McFeeley
smc@globe1.att.com
(908) 949-0554

erebus.att.com

smm
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Wed, 14 Oct 1992 18:38:06 EDT
Reply-To:     Nick Fitzpatrick <nick@SUNBURN.UWATERLOO.CA>
From:         Nick Fitzpatrick <nick@SUNBURN.UWATERLOO.CA>
Subject:      How to contact Nick

There seems to have been some problems for people
not in North America contacting me at the computer
watfrost (watfrost.uwaterloo.ca)
to try and vote for rec.games.diplomacy.  I can assure you
that the address nick@watfrost.uwaterloo.ca is good, but it
appears that a computer somewhere in Europe, is not recognizing it.

Not my problem . . . ..

However, if you cannot contact me like that, of at nick@watfrost.waterloo.edu,
which #should# still work, then try
watfrost.uwaterloo.ca!nick@mitvma.mit.edu   as that WILL work, however
it may make you mailer hiccup, I always have to use such addresses in
an alias in my .mailrc file to get them to work.

For other stuff, contact me at
nick@sunburn.uwaterloo.ca, there have been no reports (yet) of
this not working  (and if it does not work, I am sure people can use
a variation on the above theme!)

Nick
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Thu, 15 Oct 1992 12:18:16 EDT
Reply-To:     Jamie <PL436000@BROWNVM.BITNET>
From:         Jamie <PL436000@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: coasts

>From:         Tony Dugdale <CXAD@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA>
>
>I feel silly asking what seems like such an obvious
>question, but I've lost my rulebook and I just can't
>remember.  Can a fleet support an action on a
>coast it does not touch?  Answer seems clearly "no"
>but what about the following situation:
>
>F Gas S Mar-Spa(sc)
>F Mar-Spa(sc)
>    OR
>F Fin S Bar-StP(nc)
>F Bar-StP(nc)
>
>Is this valid?  My heart says yes but my head says no ...

Follow your heart.

Jamie
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Wed, 14 Oct 1992 10:09:34 +0100
Reply-To:     loeb@geocub.greco-prog.fr
From:         Daniel LOEB <loeb@ORGANON.GRECO-PROG.FR>
Subject:      Duplex
              8 Oct 1992 13:02:07 BST <9210081714.AA04439@geocub.greco-prog.fr>

>Comments:  To decide the "proper" result we need to decide if this is
>a 10-player variant ot a five-player variant.  A 4=draw in a 10 player
>variants scores different from a 3=draw in a 5 player variant.

To decide this question, I looked at the corresponding situation in
standard diplomacy. In the 2, 3, and 4 player variants each player
play several countries.

However, the game is not called a 7-player game, but rather a 2,3,or
4-player variant. And the ONLY change in the rules noted is that:
>in games for 4, 3, and 2 players supply center ownership is
>computed for each individual country even though two or more may be played
>by the same person.

It does not for example say "the countries must be played
independantly." Thus, by default, when a player wins or loses he does
so as a single unit.

I think the same is true in a 5-player youngstown variant. Thus, you
have a 3-player (equally weighted) draw, and not a 5-player draw.
Under the HALLOF FAME scoring system, each player would be given 2/3
of a victory point (instead of 2, 2, and 1 victory points
respectively.)

>   Speculation: There is a 21-player Mercator variant which has optional
>rules for a 7-player game (playing three countries each).  Would you
>rate this as a 21-player game in the version which has only has 7 players?

I would count this as a 7-player game.

Yours, Daniel Loeb                              loeb@geocub.greco-prog.fr
HOME    150, cours Victor-Hugo; Appt D45; 33000 Bordeaux France
WORK    LABRI; Universite de Bordeaux I; 33405 Talence Cedex France
PHONE(H)+(33) 56 31 48 26, (W)+(33) 56 84 69 05, (FAX) +(33) 56 84 66 69
-------------
Mankind faces a crossroads.  One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness,
the other to extinction.  Let us pray we choose correctly.  -- Woody Allen
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:        UK.AC.LEEDS.GPS;  7 OCT 92 12:52:51 BST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 12:43:15 BST
Reply-To:     amt5man@SUN.LEEDS.AC.UK
From:         amt5man@SUN.LEEDS.AC.UK
Subject:      Spa/Naf

Mark Nelson says:   "Games which allow A(Spa)-NAf are, of course,
variants.  And not particularly interesting ones at that!"

Danny Loeb writes "Yes, these are variants, but some might be interesting.
Take for example the LOEB9 variant. (I didn't invent, we played it at
my high school whenever there were too many players for normal DIP.)"


   In the context of *other* variants allowing (Spa)-Naf might be
"interesting" but within the context of an otherwise regular game it
isn't.

   Another simple rule change variant (very easy to add to Judge)
is F(Rom) where Italy starts with a F(Rom) rather than A(Rom).  THe idea
is to give Italy more flexability. Unfortunately postal experience
suggests that this change actually weakens Italy!



Mark


----- End Included Message -----
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 15:23:03 -0400
Reply-To:     ender2@HUSC.HARVARD.EDU
From:         ender2@HUSC.HARVARD.EDU
Subject:      Hey Nick!

Apologies in advance for hitting the DIPL list with this.

Nick, Re: Voting:  Your host, watfrost.waterloo.edu, is not a known site in
relation to mine.  I know I can't vote publicly.  Do you have anyplace I
can send my vote?

-- Matt
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Wed, 14 Oct 1992 17:28:41 EDT
Reply-To:     Rick Desper <desper@MATH.RUTGERS.EDU>
From:         Rick Desper <desper@MATH.RUTGERS.EDU>
Subject:      Judge

There is a judge at the University of Washington, email address:
judge@u.washington.edu.  Send a message with the line
help
(in the body of the message, not the header)
and it should be somewhat self-explanatory.

There are plenty games waiting for you!
Rick
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:        UK.AC.LEEDS.GPS;  8 OCT 92 13:07:51 BST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 13:02:07 BST
Reply-To:     amt5man@SUN.LEEDS.AC.UK
From:         amt5man@SUN.LEEDS.AC.UK
Subject:      Duplex

Summary.  A ten-player variant was run as a 5-player variant with each
player playing two powers. THe players were unable to agree a result:`
some wanted a 3-player (6 country) draw and some wanted a 3-player
(4-country) draw.

Comments:  To decide the "proper" result we need to decide if this is
a 10-player variant ot a five-player variant.  A 4=draw in a 10 player
variants scores different from a 3=draw in a 5 player variant.

My opinion was (and is) that this was a 5-player variant.  Hence the result
was a 3= draw.  If anyone was unhappy with this then they could play
on and eliminate two countries, but the result would remain a 3=player
draw.

   Speculation: There is a 21-player Mercator variant which has optional
rules for a 7-player game (playing three countries each).  Would you
rate this as a 21-player game in the version which has only has 7 players?

   Speculation:  Should regular diplomacy games be rated as 22-player
variants?  There are, after all, 22 units on the board in Spring 1901...

   There was some comment that along the lines that
"you play your countries separately".  In principle you don't.
You play your two countries as one super-power and diplome with the
other players on the basis of their two powers.  (Which is way this is
a 5-player variant.)

 An interesting discussion!

Mark
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina/BRASIL
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Wed, 14 Oct 1992 18:22:58 BSC
Reply-To:     Niccholo <PRG6CGR@BRUFSC.BITNET>
From:         Niccholo <PRG6CGR@BRUFSC.BITNET>
Subject:      Questions

Hello diplomats,
I've got a hand at Diplomacy game, a file wandering around my machine, dated
june of 90. So, I've tried a contact to a judge but couldn't get it.
So, can someone tell me please, where to write to in order to get the games
rules and how to play it (I mean where and how to sign up, etc).
Thanks in advance;
Nichollo
From: karl@ADLER.IMS.UNI-STUTTGART.DE (Karl Dotzek)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Subject: Should survival be counted in a ranking system?
Date: 15 Oct 92 12:36:27 GMT
Reply-To: karl@adler.ims.uni-stuttgart.de
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

Hello DIPL-L!

There was a discussion about ranking systems a while ago and wether
one should count surviving or not.

During which it was argued by someone, one stops playing after a power
has reached 18 centers, because one quietly assumes that it can take
the rest of the board without problems.
Thus, was said, surviving in a game wouldn't be worth crediting.

You all know that this isn't true, as we have the famous stalemate
lines. After you sit behind, let's say
Tun-TYS-Tus-Ven-Tyr-Vie-Bud-Rum-Sev, the power on the Northern side of
this line has about 20 centers, but can't approach further. Such
stalemate lines can be defended with less units than SCs they comprise.

I don't call for a rule change that one has to play until there's a
stalemate reached or one power really has got hold of all the 34
centers, that would be far too boring - a stalemate would also make no
sense in light of the fact that the
alliances holding the stalemate lines will break eventually - what I
want to point out is that it's not true, that 18 SCs mean complete
dominion automatically.

Well, don't forget the survivors when ranking!

Karl.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Full-Name: Bob Blanchett
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.30]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 18:26:43 EST
Reply-To:     Bob Blanchett <s1029708@GIAEC.CC.MONASH.EDU.AU>
From:         Bob Blanchett <s1029708@GIAEC.CC.MONASH.EDU.AU>
Subject:      CFV rec.games.dip

Can anybody confirm Nick Fitzpatrick's ID as nick@WATFROST.WATERLOO.EDU?

I get a host unknown when I am trying to cast my vote in favor of the new
group.

Cheers!
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Bob Blanchett          |                                                     |
|                       |                                   Surrey Hills,     |
|Ph: H +61 3 836 4160   | Mail:                             Melbourne VIC 3127|
|Ph: W +61 3 483 7400   | s1029708@giaeb.cc.monash.edu.au   Australia         |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Wed, 14 Oct 1992 10:28:51 +0100
Reply-To:     nick@watfrost.waterloo.edu
From:         Daniel LOEB <loeb@ORGANON.GRECO-PROG.FR>
Subject:      CFV: rec.games.diplomacy
              6 Oct 1992 20:49:11 GMT <9210062219.AA14698@geocub.greco-prog.fr>

Nick is not allowed to encourage people to vote, but I can.
Please vote for the proposed newsgroup REC.GAMES.DIPLOMACY.
We need 100 more yes votes than no votes, so your vote DOES count.
Please vote right away!

Send the message
        I vote YES for rec.games.diplomacy as proposed
to
        nick@watfrost.uwaterloo.ca  or nick@watfrost.waterloo.edu or
or reply to this article....

Contact me or Nick if you have any questions. (And feel free to send
copies of this message to your friends.)

Yours, Daniel Loeb                              loeb@geocub.greco-prog.fr
HOME    150, cours Victor-Hugo; Appt D45; 33000 Bordeaux France
WORK    LABRI; Universite de Bordeaux I; 33405 Talence Cedex France
PHONE(H)+(33) 56 31 48 26, (W)+(33) 56 84 69 05, (FAX) +(33) 56 84 66 69
-------------
Mankind faces a crossroads.  One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness,
the other to extinction.  Let us pray we choose correctly.  -- Woody Allen
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 16:34:56 -0400
Reply-To:     Nick Fitzpatrick <nick@WATFROST.UWATERLOO.CA>
From:         Nick Fitzpatrick <nick@WATFROST.UWATERLOO.CA>

Sorry about this, for those of you who can't reach me at
nick@watfrost.waterloo.edu, try nick@watfrost.uwaterloo.ca

The brain trust here, decided to eliminate the waterloo.edu aliases
(It's ok they said, we have something in place that will redirect
everyone's E-mail  )

Nick

(If you not trying to reach me for the vote, just use nick@sunburn.uwaterloo.ca)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Thu, 15 Oct 1992 12:49:11 EDT
Reply-To:     Rick Desper <desper@MATH.RUTGERS.EDU>
From:         Rick Desper <desper@MATH.RUTGERS.EDU>
Subject:      Re: coasts

I had thought the interpretation was always this:  F Gas can support F
Mar -> Spa (SC) but F Spa (SC) cannot support F Gas.

In fact, I had a question from one of my players in Cheetah regarding
exactly this situation, where Italy wanted to know if F Aeg can
support F Con -> Bul (EC).  I said I thought so, and  we put it
through Judge, which accepted the move.

Rick
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.dipl-l
Date:         Thu, 15 Oct 1992 09:53:48 CDT
Reply-To:     Philip Miesle <phygod72@NIC.GAC.EDU>
From:         Philip Miesle <phygod72@NIC.GAC.EDU>
Subject:      Recommended openings?

I was wondering if there is a file somewhere containing reccommended
openings out there somewhere.  Where can I get this if it does exist?


Phil Miesle
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU