From: MAILER-DAEMON@earth.cc.mancol.edu (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
Date: 31 Jul 92 14:00:22 GMT
Article-I.D.: udel.1992Jul31.145450.11518
Organization: University of Delaware
Originator: mmdf@nigel.ee.udel.edu


   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 <INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU>... Unbalanced '<'
bellmail: error signal 11
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by earth.cc.mancol.edu (AIX  2.1 2/4.03)
          id AA01746; Fri, 31 Jul 92 10:00:22 EDT
Received: by manvax.cc.mancol.edu (MX V3.0) id 671; Fri, 31 Jul 1992 04:24:42
          EDT
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 04:24:37 EDT
From: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
X-Mx-Warning:   Warning -- Invalid "To" header.
To: "MartinRedmond"<MARTIN@manvax.bitnet
Message-Id: <0095E611.98530D60.671@manvax.cc.mancol.edu>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail

Received: from RICEVM1.RICE.EDU by manvax.bitnet; Fri, 31 Jul 92 04:10 EDT
Received: by RICEVM1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) id 6577; Fri, 31 Jul 92 02:55:11 CDT
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 06:29:44 GMT
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@EARTH.CC.MANCOL.EDU>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
To: 'Martin Redmond' <MARTIN@manvax.bitnet>
Reply-to: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was info-minix-request@UDEL.EDU
Comments: To: info-minix@udel.edu

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 <INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'
     
   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by earth.cc.mancol.edu (AIX  2.1 2/4.03)
          id AA28023; Fri, 31 Jul 92 02:29:44 EDT
Received: by manvax.cc.mancol.edu (MX V3.0) id 587; Fri, 31 Jul 1992 01:08:51
          EDT
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 01:08:48 EDT
From: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
X-Mx-Warning:   Warning -- Invalid "To" header.
To: "MartinRedmond"<MARTIN@manvax.bitnet
Message-Id: <0095E5F6.3D4D9D60.587@manvax.cc.mancol.edu>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
     
Received: from RICEVM1.RICE.EDU by manvax.bitnet; Fri, 31 Jul 92 01:07 EDT
Received: by RICEVM1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) id 3043; Thu, 30 Jul 92 23:17:45 CDT
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 01:57:24 GMT
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@EARTH.CC.MANCOL.EDU>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
To: 'Martin Redmond' <MARTIN@manvax.bitnet>
Reply-to: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was info-minix-request@UDEL.EDU
Comments: To: info-minix@udel.edu
     
   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 <INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'
     
   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by earth.cc.mancol.edu (AIX  2.1 2/4.03)
          id AA27704; Thu, 30 Jul 92 21:57:24 EDT
Received: by manvax.cc.mancol.edu (MX V3.0) id 582; Thu, 30 Jul 1992 22:14:00
          EDT
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 22:13:55 EDT
From: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
X-Mx-Warning:   Warning -- Invalid "To" header.
To: "MartinRedmond"<MARTIN@manvax.bitnet
Message-Id: <0095E5DD.CF5D0240.582@manvax.cc.mancol.edu>
Subject: Re: OS compare (Unix/clone)
     
Received: from RICEVM1.RICE.EDU by manvax.bitnet; Thu, 30 Jul 92 22:08 EDT
Received: by RICEVM1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) id 0463; Thu, 30 Jul 92 21:00:21 CDT
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 22:30:35 GMT
From: Bill Pechter <pechter@OCPT.CCUR.COM>
Subject: Re: OS compare (Unix/clone)
To: 'Martin Redmond' <MARTIN@manvax.bitnet>
Reply-to: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was info-minix-request@UDEL.EDU
Comments: To: info-minix@udel.edu
     
In article <1992Jul29.172406.29587@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
 torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Benedict Torvalds) writes:
>
>Having several different code/date-segments doesn't lend itself very
>well to high-level languages (it doesn't even work too well in assembly,
>but there the programmer often knows what he/she is doing).  Thus
>coherent 3.2 and minix don't even try: they keep to one segment, and
>limit all data to 64kB.  You can do a lot in 64kB, but I'd rather miss
>the experience.
>
     
I hate to say it - but back in the old PDP11 days they had overlays.
And learned to like them.
     
And we walked 50 miles to school, uphill, and we didn't have shoes then...
8-)
     
There is some satisfaction in shoehorning the most functionality in to
the smallest space.  The amazing fact that a PDP11 could multitask
with the same 64k of memory that ran CP/M was amazing to me.
     
I grew up with PDP11's and love the fact that RT11 can run foreground
and background tasks (up to 15 background tasks) in a machine with only
64kb of real memory is a fact that some people that haven't had to live
with those restrictions don't understand.
     
Unfortunately, you can't run X in that space, or NFS... Perhaps TCP/IP
though...
     
Bill
     
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Bill Pechter, N2RDI           | The postman always pings twice.
        Concurrent Computer Corp.     | pechter@ocpt.ccur.com
        2 Crescent Place, Oceanport, NJ 07757 - Tel:908-870-4780
--
Mail System (MMDF)
--
Mail System (MMDF)
-- 
Mail System (MMDF)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix