HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mminihan@inetg1.ARCO.COM (Mike Minihan)
Subject: RECRUITING: Up and Coming Data
Organization: ARCO Oil and Gas Company
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 19:39:19 GMT

I have received alot of e-mail asking  recruiting questions. I have just
started getting all of my data, even from the east coast. This will take
about a week-10 days to compile all of the data, and I will post the
results
as quick as I can. Thank you for your interest.
-- 

Mike Minihan      mminihan@arco.com
From: sl45z@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Copper Bowl finish/ WAC
Date: 30 Dec 92 11:02:41 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

	There's been a lot of talk about Utah going for the field goal and tie
with a win well within reach.  It seems to me that Utah didn't make up their
mind at the beginning of the 1st and goal.  First and second downs were
insignificant, but third down showed a lack of forsight.  They went ahead and
ran the play that WSU called a time out for to defend properly.  Utah should
have come out with a new play.  IMHO, if they wanted to play for the tie and
possibly win, then they should have run the ball towards the center of the
field.  Even a 5yd loss would have been totally acceptable to get a good angle
on a chip-shot field goal.  If they were serious for the win, they should have
run more early and moved into play-action-pass on third and/or fourth down. 
Don't call this 20/20 hindsight, I saw it all the way.
	Good showing, Utah.  The WAC is keeping it's head high this bowl season
with close games that were always winable.  A little luck will see the WAC go 
3 for 5.  Don't think that Miss. has a cake walk with Air Force.
	Good Luck WAC!!!!

-- 
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
     |	Travis L. Clements |   	With all the anger in the land
     |  N. Logan, Utah     |    How long before the judgement day?            
     ----------------------|    Before we cut the Fat Ones* down to size?
    * Miami, A&M, Michigan |    Before the Woofing Gods arrive?
    Notre Dame, Florida St |
|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+||+
From: cg894@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Brian Lee Wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Special Sugar Bowl Report.
Date: 31 Dec 1992 14:41:44 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I agree that the Tide can win, but they must play a near-perfect
game to do so.  The defence is definitely their strong suit.  It
will require, however, a Heisman day from quarterback Jay Barker
for a Bama victory.  Defensivemaniacs Copeland, Curry, and    
Langham will play a large part, but they will not win the game
for the offence.
 
I predict a GREAT game with Bama on top by three or four, and 
in the last ten minutes.
 
Roll Tide and Happy New Year!

-- 
Brian Wilson (not from the Beach Boys)
 
"How come two wrongs don't make a right, yet three lefts do?"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: krall@Think.COM (Tom Krall)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Protest over FSU Mascot
Date: 28 Dec 1992 17:50:08 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: custard.think.com

In article <23DEC199217093611@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov>, acdendy@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (ROGER DENDY) writes:
|> In article <Bzq7xD.43C@trc.amoco.com>, zcjm0f@wwnv67.hou.amoco.com (CJohn Mace) writes...
|> >In a related note:
|> > 
|> >The Dallas Morning News reports that there is a small herd of Buffalo
|> >who are going to march on the University of Colorado campus in an 
|> >effort to protest their image being used as a mascot.  "We feel so used
|> >and left out in the cold.  It's not fair.  No one uses the prairie dog
|> 							    ^^^^^^^^^^^
|> >as a mascot.
|> 
|> Prairie Dogs.  Isn't that Minnesota?
|> 

Pleeeezee, we're Gophers, ya know...Rodents, Not Dogs !!!!!

 ;^>  or is that ;^=    (Please note Goldy's buck teeth !!!)

-Tom



|> -----
|>      But that's just MY opinion.	Roger Dendy
|> 					Analex Corp.
|>      acdendy@convx1.lerc.nasa.gov	(216) 433-2186
|> ********************************************************************
|>  "Everybody says that we've got to have a low-cost, reliable 	   
|>   launch vehicle.  That's an oxymoron.  Boy, that's tougher than  
|>   a skunk."--John Young, Johnson Space Center, 12/14/92
|> -----
|> 
|> Finally got that .sig thing figgered out.
|> 

-- 
=============================
Thomas F. Krall 
Product Support
Thinking Machines Corporation
=============================

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: lein@cat.uucp (John Leinaweaver)
Subject: Re: Big East Bowl Preview
Organization: Bellcore, Piscataway NJ
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 15:24:34 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.045259.3819@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> zuniga@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Ralph Zuniga (FREAC/CAR)) writes:
>In article <1992Dec20.011006.18143@colorado.edu> manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu) writes:
>>In article <BzIpor.1CF@acsu.buffalo.edu> v262xxve@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Timothy C Pitts) writes:
>>>Big East Bowl Preview for Jan. 1, 1993
>>>
>>>SYRACUSE (9-2,6-1)
>>>This week:  Colorado (9-1-1) in Fiesta Bowl.  Colorado has been winning with
>>>smoke and mirrors.  Nebraska brought in a fan to let us all see what's going
>>>on under the smoke and it wasn't pretty.  Quality play by Syracuse against
>>>Miami almost made for an upset, but certainly proved that Syracuse is one
>>>of the elite teams of the year.  Syracuse has struggled somewhat outside the
>>>dome, but its play in the last half of the season was up to preseason 
>>>expectations.  Marvin Graves should have no trouble moving the ball on a
>>>team that has proved susceptible to decent offenses.
>>
>>we'll see, won't we? I am sure a lot of Big & Easy fans are going to be
>>terribly upset after the game.
>>
>>>Prediction:  Syracuse 36, Colorado 21.
>>
>>Colorado 21 Syracuse 17
>>
>>>Timothy C. Pitts
>>
>>Njan
>
>Well, the Big East might not be in the category of the allmighty Big Eight
>conference, but it's teams are a lot more exciting to watch than those
>from the Astroturf league.

Does the Big East have any true-grass fields left?

Pitt, Syracuse, Temple, WVU - have Astroturf
next year Rutgers plays all home games at the Meadowlands (Astroturf)
Miami and Rutgers (after 1993) have PAT

That leave Virginia Tech and BC (I'm not sure what surface these two have).


John L
From: acamberos@pimacc.pima.edu (AL CAMBEROS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Mascot ASCII PICs
Date: 23 Dec 92 18:30:23 GMT


	Does anybody out there have any ASCII PICs of a wolf or husky.
	z
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rownd@moby.micro.umn.edu (Brooks Kerry Rownd)
Subject: SEC wins...
Organization: University of Minnesota CIS
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 07:24:07 GMT

	A lot of talk went into who had the best(worst) conference
	this year, but after today the SEC cannot be doubted.  If 
	Mississippi State wins the Peach Bowl tomorrow, the SEC will
	not only have the undisputed national champion, but an 
	outstanding 6-0 sweep in the bowls.  Most of these games
	were not close, to boot.  

	Sugar Bowl:  Ouch!  I knew Miami was sloppy, but I had no 
	idea Alabama would make them look completely inept.  Bama
	took control on both sides of the ball and outplayed Miami
	the whole game.  Suprisingly, the Bama offense played quite
	well despite how mediocre people have said they were.  
	There was only one #1 team playing in this game.

	Fiesta Bowl:  A suprisingly low score for Syracuse in a game
	where their option was looking good.  The Buffies started 
	poorly, but eventually made the plays they needed to stay
	close.  A few less mistakes and they could've had this one.

	Rose Bowl: He ate his Wheat(l)ies!  8^)

	Orange Bowl: Here's what I'm really here to talk about...simply
	put, the Huskers were one step behind in every aspect of this 
	game due to FSU's superior athletes.  Just about what was
	expected.  This game was bound to be a race, and NU made costly
	mistakes early and just fell behind for good and never 
	managed to establish their game.  Pressure on Frazier showed his 
	inexperience, but he did manage some nice plays and will learn.  
	Of course there was the traditional missed 
	pitch which I almost come to expect now.  They played hard, 
	but FSU was too talented.  Time to think about next year...  8^)

====-----=-----=-----=-----=-----====-----=-----==-----=-----==-----=-----====
Brooks Kerry Rownd         \/     || 1-'Bama 5-UFlor 9-TexAM 13-Tenne 17-Hawii
bkrrrrr                    /\     || 2-Miami 6-Georg 10-Stan 14-Color 18-WshSt
brooks@ast1.spa.umn.edu __/__\__  || 3-FlaSt 7-Michi 11-Wash 15-OhioS 19-NCStU
(128.101.221.1)          /    \   || 4-NotrD 8-Syrac 12-Nebr 16-Missi 20-Peach
====-----=-----=-----=-----=-----====-----=-----==-----=-----==-----=-----====
From: R.Vincent.Lamb@um.cc.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Big Ten Bowl Preview (12-30-92)
Date: 2 Jan 1993 17:13:28 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

In article C03C6w.I6F@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu, peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Randy
Peppler) wrote:
 
|>The big question I have is whether the Stanford band will be appearing?!
 
The Stanford band (known to its friends as the Leland Stanford Junior
University Marching Banned or LSJUMB) did indeed make an appearance.
Here is a posting I made to rec.arts.marching.misc about it:
 
In article <C05qxE.16s@ais.org>, plucky@ais.org wrote (Re: LSJUMB's
show at the Blockbuster Bowl:
 
 
|>In article <18559494@um.cc.umich.edu> R.Vincent.Lamb@um.cc.umich.edu writes:
|>>What show is the SMUT planning for New Year's Day?  I don't get ESPN, so I
|>>won't see it.
 
|>    Hang on a sec -- the BallBuster Bowl is on CBS... so you 
|>won't see it.  Not unless CBS decides to quietly ignore the old
|>"you never show the Stanford Band live on network TV" policy.
 
They didn't just quietly ignore it--they gleefully and loudly ignored
it!  They made a big point of saying they'd show the LSJUMB at
at halftime.  Unfortunately, all they showed was the $ from the
backside and then zoomed in to show the bandmembers from 5-10' away
during the next song so no one could recognize the tune or formation.
d-: !  CBS also did not have the announcer on.  This made the Banned 
look zany, but generally harmless.
 
|>  The shows for the bowl were initially suggested by contributors
|>to the Band's e-mailing-list.  Traditions of secrecy and the need
|>for plausible deniability if it sucks prevent me from describing
|>the shows here before they're presented... but if you think the
|>concept of the "Poulan Weed Eater Bowl" is a shitty idea, you'll
|>probably appreciate the pregame show.
 
The CBS announcers seemed to enjoy it! 
 
|>My guess is that you will "inaugurate" Bill Clinton.  Do I get a spliff?
|>>(Do you expect a *tobacco* cigar from the LSJUMB?)
|>
|>      But since Bill didn't inhale (nudge wink), the Band
|>members wouldn't get to use the wacky and cool-looking fire extinguisher
|>smoke effect.
 
Too bad!
 
The band looked very small BTW.  Whatsamatta U?  The University
would spring for any more plane tix?
 
Congratulations on the bowl victory and getting better coverage
than the Penn State Blue Band (surprise!).
 
Rich Lamb
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.college:24372 comp.os.os2.advocacy:11432
From: dpassage@soda.berkeley.edu (David G. Paschich)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Subject: Re: Bowl Game Sponsorship
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy
Date: 3 Jan 1993 00:45:21 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu

In article <1993Jan2.131113.24058@bnlux1.bnl.gov> niebuhr@bnlux1.bnl.gov (david niebuhr) writes:
>IBM has a lot of gall sponsoring the Fiesta Bowl after announcing
>that it would lay off up to 25,000 people worldwide.  Let's put
>things in perspective: What is more important? jobs or a bowl game?
>
>How much did IBM spend on commercials?  If it was sponsoring the
>bowl game, why didn't it fix up the field since it apparently has
>the money?
>
>I like the bowl games as much as anyone else, but I also would
>like to see people have jobs and not find out a few days after
>the announcement was made in the papers that their soon-to-be
>former employer is spending big bucks to sponsor a bowl game.

This is really unrelated to r.s.f.c, so I'll try to be brief.

IBM is losing out basically because it has failed to adapt its
business from the mainframe-orientation of the 60s and 70s to
the PC-orientation of the 80s, 90s and beyond.  If you watched the
IBM ads, you'll notice that they were pushing OS/2, a PC product.

Also, the press has slightly misrepresented the reduction of the number
of people IBM is employing.  No one is being forced out:  IBM expects
to be able to reduce its work force by 25,000 people through normal
attrition of people retiring, going to other jobs, etc.

It seems to me that, rather than wasting money on a frivolous
exercise while ruining peoples lives, as you imply, IBM is making
an effort to invest money in areas likely to have a good return
while doing what it can to reduce its workforce as painlessly
as possible.

Followups to comp.os.os2.advocacy.



-- 
David G. Paschich	Comp Sci Undergrad Association		UC Berkeley
dpassage@soda.berkeley.edu			  dpassage@ana-ng.chaos.org
"We will create a new political climate where the system does not
attract ego-driven, power-hungry people." -- Ross Perot
From: HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Protest over FSU Mascot
Date: 23 Dec 1992 20:05:38 GMT
Organization: University of Houston Administrative Computing
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: uhad2.admin.uh.edu
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20

In <kitchel.725139442@manta> kitchel@manta.dpsi.com writes:

> dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com (David Head) writes:

 [Dave can't see why Seminoles is seen as degrading, although he can see
 [ why Redskins would be.  Notes that the Seminoles of Florida have no problems
 [with the name and have made the mascots costume.  Suggests drawing animal 
 [names out of a hat, tongue firmly in cheek at this point.]

> 	It's not a matter of your opinion, Dave, or the opinion of the
> FSU AD about the appropriateness of the name. It is a matter of the
> Indians' opinion.
[deletion]
> 	I used to have an opinion close to yours but I have reformed.
> There is absolutely no defense for "Redskins" and damned little for
> "Seminole", if the Seminoles object.

  But that's just it, Sid.  The American Indians in question, the Seminoles of
Florida, don't mind.  They seem to like it.  But their fellow American Indians,
who of course know what's good for the Seminoles of Florida, want to have
their little protest anyway.  Sounds awfully paternalistic and patronizing to
me--like the Seminoles of Florida need their wise brothers to make their
decisions for them.  I think not.  Re-read Dave's post, I think you missed 
something.


semper fi,

Jammer Jim Miller 
Texas A&M University '89 and '91
********************************************************************************
* Speak for my employers?  They don't even know I exist!		       *
*"Become one with the Student Billing System. *BE* the Student Billing System."*
* "Power finds its way to those who take a stand.  Stand up, Ordinary Man."    *
*      ---Rik Emmet, Gil Moore, Mike Levine: Triumph 		               *
********************************************************************************
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 13:48:42 EST
From: <JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Special Sugar Bowl Report.

In article <1992Dec28.154732.4767@admin1.memst.edu>, jasmith@admin1.memst.edu
(John) says:
>
>         offense, who is lead by a heisman trophy winner that
>         shouldn't have even been considered in the race for
>         the heisman.  Alabama offensive will run circles around
>         the Miami defensive running the score up in the fourth
>         quarter.  Should have given the heisman to some Alabama
>         quarterback before the Miami QB.  Roll Tide Roll.
>
>         A-L-A-B-A-M-A C-R-I-M-S-O-N T-I-D-E THE VERY BEST OF ALL
>         THE REST.
>
>         Knock-Knock. Who's there? Could be the Tide cause they'd
>         ROLL all over you.
>
>         Roses are red.  Violets are blue.
>         Alabama the team that going to Roll all over you.
>
>         Go Tide GO!!!!
>
>         Tick-Tock. Tick-tock.
>         The times running down on Alabama's crown.
>
>         Cane, Cane.  Oh, what pain your going to gain from the game.
>
>         Roll Tide Roll.
>
>         Alabama #1. Miami somewhere underneath.

O Mighty Woof Gods, ignore the yammerings of this hapless infidel, one
who clearly has been raised in an oxygen-poor environment.  Know ye
now that Alabama is but a worm under the foot of the juggernaut that
is the Miami Tropical Depressions.

Actually, the reports out of New Orleans have been fairly entertaining
of late.  Miami FB Stephen McGuire announced his intentions of rushing
for over 100 yards and being named Sugar Bowl MVP.  Curry and Copland
just looked at each other and said something about that simply not
being in the cards, while LB [and recent scoring maniac] Antonio
Langham made a warning about writing checks that your butt can't
catch.

Stallings has been EXTREMELY pleased with this week's practices;
there has been actual film of him smiling.  The team is reportedly
VERY fired up; they're dedicating the game to sophomore LB Michael
Rogers, still in the hospital recovering from a Christmas Eve car
accident that killed the driver of the car Rogers was in.  Although
Rogers is lucid from time to time, he still has periodic spells of
amnesia and occasionally thinks he is still in high school.

All the makings of a hell of a game.  I still think the Tide can
pull of the win, but the offense will have to play a near-perfect game.


Jim Thomas
From: traynor@fnalo.fnal.gov
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: NOTRE DAME IS THE GREATEST
Date: 30 Dec 92 03:23:18 GMT
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.college
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalo.fnal.gov

In article <1992Dec24.022408.8518@wdl.loral.com>,  (Brad Snyder) writes:
> 
> Take a good look.        ..one reason why ND is not the               
> greatest...................................................STANFORD!!!
> 
> And don't give me the cry baby story of how they had to study that week....
> 
> my ass........Stanford had to study and take a plane to hell indiana to
> play them..........plus most Football players take cake majors and get
> special treatment (tutors, make-up tests etc.)......

I roomed next to an ND player (Joe Howard).  He was not taking a cake major.
ND players do not get special treatment academically. 

By the way, from early May until early October ND/South Bend is a truly
beautiful place.  Afterwards, well...

 > ........STANFORD beat them and Holtz is a cry baby about it....
 
Stanford beat ND, that is true.  I will not say Lou was a crybaby about it.

One game that really stands out as to why ND is a great football school is 
the ND-SMU game in '89.  Take a look at what happened at that game the 
next time you hear about ND having no class.  Would Miami have done the same?
I doubt it.
  
					-Mike Traynor

NNN  NN DDDD    Mike Traynor (ND '86)(Rice '93?) |||     Amiga 500 owner   ///
 N N N   D  D   Fermilab PO Box 500 MS 221 E683  |||     w/MMR 13 Meg RAM ///
 N  NN   D  D   Batavia IL, 60510   USA         //|\\    190 Meg HD   \\\/// 
NN   NN DDDD    (708) 879-6095 [ans. mach.]    /// \\\   14.4Kbps modem\XX/
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jli@bingham.utah.edu (Jianliang Li)
Subject: ~~~~~~~ MIAMI 35 : BAMA 31 ~~~~~~~
Organization: University of Utah
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 22:34:57 GMT


		Check it out tomorrow!

JLi
================================================================================
      	 	       ******* RULES OF LIFE ******* 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	     RULE NO. 1:  YOUR BOSS IS ALWAYS RIGHT!
	     RULE NO. 2:  IF YOUR BOSS IS WRONG, GO TO RULE NO. 1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        JLI@MINES.UTAH.EDU (Jianliang Li)    PENN STATE '90  UTAH '2000
================================================================================


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: elfering@socrates.umd.edu (David J. Elfering)
Subject: Re: Thank you, Kansas!  8^)
Organization: University of Maryland University College
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 16:52:04 GMT

A heartfelt congratulations to the Kansas Jayhawks. They played tough, and
stayed in there to come back for the win. If Kansas doesn't finish the
year with at least a #20 rankign then something's wrong/stinks. Great
game! 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rownd@moby.micro.umn.edu (Brooks Kerry Rownd)
Subject: Re: Thank you, Kansas! 8^)
Organization: University of Minnesota CIS
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 03:06:27 GMT

>>>>>     Yay!  And it was nice to see a future millionaire eat the
>>>>>     turf a few times too! 8^)
>>>
>>>       Just curious what this implication is??
>>>
>>        Tom Young: brother of current $$$QB Steve Young.  As in
>>        if he follows his brother's example = $$$QB.  As in I
>>        enjoy seeing the wonder-boy hero of the "passing team"
>                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>  Tom Young is the #4 quarterback on the BYU depth chart.  That hardly
>  qualifies him for "wonder-boy" status.  I'm guessing from your post that you
>  didn't know that the Aloha Bowl was Young's first start.  Actually, it was
>  the first time that he had taken more than a few snaps in any game. His
>  performance certainly won't hurt his chances, but in order to follow in his
>  brother's (Oldest brother - he had another brother -Mike- who also played at
>  BYU, but never amounted to much) footsteps, he will have to beat out the
>  three wonder-boy heroes ahead of him.
>
	I was under the impression that he was a fresh/soph at the 
	time - and on a QB filled team his performance seemed
	very good given the situation.  4th string usually means
	fresh/soph, so I just ass(=me?)umed this was his status.
	If it were so, he would have plenty of time to reach first
	string.  I have already had some e-mail chats on this - 
	forgive my ignorance of the BYU QB lineup, but it was 
	afterall just a 8^) joke...  He got a quite a bit of hype
	about being S Young's brother, too, which inspired the
	8^) joke...
>>
>Scott Eldredge
>
>
>
>>====-----=-----=-----=-----=-----====-----=-----==-----=-----==-----=-----====

====-----=-----=-----=-----=-----====-----=-----==-----=-----==-----=-----==== 
Brooks Kerry Rownd         \/     || 1-Miami 5-TexAM 9-Michi 13-Tenne 17-NCStU
bkrrrrr                    /\     || 2-FlaSt 6-Syrac 10-UFla 14-Missi 18-Color 
brooks@ast1.spa.umn.edu __/__\__  || 3-'Bama 7-Washi 11-Nebr 15-USCal 19-WshSt 
(128.101.221.1)          /    \   || 4-NotrD 8-Georg 12-Stan 16-OhioS 20-MissS 
====-----=-----=-----=-----=-----====-----=-----==-----=-----==-----=-----====
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college