From: bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ron Bense)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Susan smears Holtsinger unjustly
Date: 29 Dec 92 15:15:16 GMT
Reply-To: bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ronald Bense)
Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD

In talk.abortion, Peter Nyikos, aka "the Putrid Narcissist"
>In <1157@blue.cis.pitt.edu> sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:

>That was an attempt by Holtsinger to quote Humphrey, to illustrate what
>racist tendencies this redneck has.  The correct quote is as follows:

]______________Excerpt from Chaney's "Boyz n the KKK Hood" .sig __________
]
]             / ---   ---  \
]            /  [ ]   [ ]   \
]           /                \
]          /                  \
]         /      --------      \
]        /       |      |       \
]       /        --------        \
]      /                          \
]     /                            \
]/--------------------------------------\
]|      |Come on, Steve.  Let's  |      |
]|      |see just how much of a  |      |
]|      |boy you are.  March     |      |
]|      |your fat black ass down |      |
]|      |here and tell me I'm a  |      |
]|      |liar, to my face.       |      |
]|      |  - PatricKKK Humphrey  |      |

Dear PN, please not that the above makes several libelous statements
about Sir Humphrey. Also note that said statements are untrue. This
fact, that the statements are untrue, is otherwise construed as lying
on the part of he who wrote them. Patrick has assured me that he is
not a KKK member, and I'd believe him over the garbled rantings of
what at best could be termed a mediocre mind at any time, especially
when such charges are made in such a defamatory way after the individual(?)
was affronted by Patrick.

>For Susan, a net.bosom.buddy of the man Steve Chaney calls "PatricKKK"
>to refer to "the Reverend" in the above way, illustrates the depths of
>hypocrisy to which she has sunk.

Irony is completely lost on you, isn't it. Even when the top level was
as shallow as it was in this case. (The deeper levels escape you completely,
I guess.)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>And BTW, I have yet to see Garvin document a single lie by Holtsinger.
>I on the other hand can document lots of falsehoods by Garvin.  See
>the series "The Mendacity of Suasan Garvin", Part 2 of which
>was posted today.

PN, are you blind, or is it just that selective newsreader of yours?
Perhaps a reminder of the series where DoDie claims that RvW allows
unrestricted abortion throughout the nine month term after repeated
posts showing this to be false will clear the cobwebs??? (After all,
after sixty years, there must be a lot of dust and cobwebs in the unused
spaces. We really should be more considerate that the dust is clogging
up your workings.)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>Doug is not a psychotic.  On the other hand, this "Mendacity" series is
>slowly accumulating evidence that Susan *may* be a sociopath.

You realize of course that Bill will jump on your case for making a
medical diagnosis without proper evidence and certification, don't you?
:)

>PS  I am not making all these anti-Garvin posts today because I have a
>fixation on her, but because:

Really?!? I bet she's relieved!

>1.  She throws so much shit in talk.abortion, I'm afraid a good fraction
>of it sticks every day.

"shit" is an opinion. Hopefully some of it does....

>Mark Cochran   Keith Cochran   Patrick Humphrey  Dean Kaflowitz
>Steve Novak   Steven Mezias  J H Woodyatt  Jim Keegan   Brian Kauffman
>Dan King   Mark Ira Kauffman   drieux   Larry Margolis   Chris Lyman
>Ron Bense   Lefty   Gordon Storga ...

Well, I don't know how to take this list. Does my placement near the
end mean I'm one of your more favorable people to read? Or, as it seems
from some weeks ago, have I offended you just a little less than Lefty
and Gordon Storga, but more than Chris Lyman?

>Adrienne Regard   Sarah McCabe  Muriel Nelson   Kathi Mills  Heather
>rocker    Teddi  Linda Birmingham

>Have I left anyone out?  More importantly, have I maligned anyone
>unjustly?  My apologies to anyone who does not belong on one of the
>two lists above.

Don't you need credibility to malign someone?

Ron                          Think about this one (seen on a bumper sticker):
			     The road to hell is bumper-to-bumper
			     Make a U-turn to God.
The irony is priceless.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion