HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: crathbun@nmsu.edu (Chriss Rathbun)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Pickup Lines
Date: 23 Jul 92 17:01:16 GMT
	<13511@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
	<1992Jul20.232128.19468@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
	<1992Jul21.181446.21239@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
Organization: NMSU Computer Science


>   From: mhz@pyuxe.uucp (25853-zani)
>   Well after 10 years "invested" in a relationship/marriage with a 
>   negative rate of return, I'm out in the single world again.  Unfortunately,
>   my ex was my first date/boyfriend/live-in/husband/ex.  Any help out there?
>   Yes, I'm looking for a long term relationship. 

tried to reply directly but your e-mail address mhz@pyuxe.uucp
bounces.
so...

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 <mhz%pyuxe.uucp>... Host unknown
   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Subject: Re: Pickup Lines

NO.

frequent bars if you enjoy bars, they're places to have fun and
thats pretty much all.  Long term is generally not found through
a drunken haze, one night stands are.
        
take some time, enjoy being single and independent!  date yourself,
i.e., learn who you are and what you want on your own.  this makes 
finding an SO later significantly easier and more likely to flourish.

if you still insist on meeting someone "now!" trust your friends, have
them introduce you to some other friends that just "happen" to be
single too.  go places with a group of friends.  its alot easier
if someone you know knows them.  you get to take a lot of the risk out
of the situation and it allows you to subtley ask things like, "so...,
did he like me?" etc.

the northeast is typically "colder" and it is more difficult to
really meet people there, i spent the first 22 years of my life
in new york/ct.  if you were not introduced by a friend you might as
well burn in hell (freeze, might be a more appropriate adjective)
at least thats the impression i got.  my best experiences oddly
enough, were with girls that ex-girlfriends would set me up with.
i like to stay friends, its more important in the long run.

btw, my ex (spent 3 of the past 5 years, living together/engaged)
and i broke up this february so i've got an idea of i what you're 
going through.  feeling a bit like a fish out of water. :)

after so many years of thinking this is who i'm gonna be with, i had no 
clue how to start dating again.  still trying though, its a slow
process.  don't rush it, enjoy yourself!

btw2, i'm 29 and if you wanna talk, feel free, my jobs require me to
babysit computers most of the week, this leaves me ample time to
philosophize etc.
hugs,
chriss
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: cocoa@iat.holonet.net (Elise - little 'e')
Subject: Re: Define "FEMININE" anything goes...
Organization: The Chocolate Factory
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 04:48:03 GMT

Max:
>|>Feminine means skimpy silk undies underneath blue jeans

Dutton:
>|>Is it wrong for a man .....
>|>Hold it. Could you go into a little more detail?

Max:
>|>Black

Mark:
>|Zebra striped, while we're on the subject. :)


In article <13811@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>None.
>
>It's a good thing Max didn't use the word "panties" instead of "undies" or
>that guy that was ready to take his vacation in her neck of the woods would
>have been joined by many others.  When a woman says "panties" it makes young
>boy's sticker peck up.

Does that mean I should tell the young boys I meet that I don't wear 
"panties"?

Yes, I do wear them, but I don't want to get the young boys all sticker-ed
up by telling them I wear white silk panties against my "cafe-au-lait" flesh.
So I'm just asking for the politically correct protocol here. 

Just me,

little 'e'

- -
"Shaking all of the roots, attack of all the waves!
 My soul wandered, happy, sad, unending."


-- 
Recently re-located, and now permanently residing at _The_Chocolate_Factory_
*  *   e-mail: cocoa@iat.holonet.net    -     voicemail: 415-337-4940   *  *
From: keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Breats Puns
Date: 23 Jul 92 17:56:13 GMT
Organization: California-Nevada Methodist Homes

>>Thank you for making a clean breast of it.
>>Another thread of puns?  I bet we can return you tit for tat.
>Ah, a thread like this is sure to bring back some great mammaries.
>-Nance
>Nance Colucci  *^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*  | Discussions welcomed. 
Ah, Nance Colucci, How are you?  I can't believe that you would be such
a "boob" and respond to this thread.  I guess you just couldn't help
yourself, as you probably had to get it off your chest.  However,
someone one told me that you were a "BRAt", and that you couldn't help
yourself in these matters.  Oh well, maybe we can "NIPple" this in the 
bud right now.  Sorry if I seem to have cut right to the "JUGular", but
I didn't think you would mind a little "ribbing"!  Take care!
--Keith
From: sjo2693@tesla.njit.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: She called, I came, she smiled, I slept
Date: 21 Jul 92 05:09:16 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology

In article <1992Jul20.173849.12055@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>, ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
> mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor) writes:
>>I think the highest compliment I got in that respect was when he said,
>>" wow, I almost passed out on that one."
> 
> Sure beats the heck out of "I especially liked it when you moved!"
> 
> -- 
> Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjj@mits.mdata.fi (Joni Jarvenkyla)
Subject: Re: Those looooong and hard love sessions (was: Re: She called, I came, she smiled, I slept)
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 16:38:24 GMT

In article <1992Jul26.131356.12894@newstand.syr.edu> haroome@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Allisson Roome) writes:
>Don't be ageist.  Older men tend to last longer - they're more into
>enjoying the experience than just getting their rocks off.  One of the
>best lovers I've known and I lasted around eight hours and he was 54
>and had children older than I was (24 - 2+ years ago).

And I'm 22 and already in 21 hours.

Anybody care for a week when I reach thirty?

-- 
jjj@mits.mdata.fi             Kirjoitatko sin{ n{it{ ihan selvin p{in?
jjj@niksula.hut.fi                          -Petteri J{rvinen
From: ross@zooid.guild.org (Ross Ridge)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Why are Women *SO* Vain ??
Date: 24 Jul 92 18:35:37 GMT
Organization: ZOOiD BBS

terra@reed.edu writes:
>if he can tolerate the way I look dripping wet after
>a shower, then we're meant for each other.

fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter) writes:
>I don't think this is a good test ... what if he's nearsighted and doesn't
>have his glasses on ?

Then he obviously passes the test.  Don't complain Fred, this means you
and terra are ment for each other.

							Ross Ridge

-- 
Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU					     l/	 //
								    [OO][oo]
ross@zooid.guild.org						    /()\/()/
uunet.ca!zooid!ross						     db	 //
From: kgorman@star-trek.bbn.com (Karen Gorman)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: A short metaphor for love
Date: 29 Jul 1992 14:23:41 GMT
Organization: BeanTown's Best
Reply-To: kgorman@BBN.COM (Karen Gorman)
NNTP-Posting-Host: archive.bbn.com
Keywords: Paaak the caaa in the Haavaad yaaard

In article <l7d5pdINNr8l@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>In article <1992Jul29.013845.22771@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
>>In article <l7bdquINN92v@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:

>>>I asked the baby for a kiss and she whapped me in the face with a block.
>>

>>Mommy said 'Owitch!', and baby kissed mommy on the cheek and said 'Dea, I made
>>it aww betta'.
>>
>>(Notice how the Boston accent enters in at an early age there)


>Just to correct this hideous slander before it affects anyones opinion of
>me.
>
>I am not from Boston, I am from Ohio.  This means, among other things:

Ohio didn't have what you wanted and you moved to Boston.

>a)  I do not push little old ladies down on the sidewalk to make the train
>when there's going to be another train along in five minutes.

Bostonians maybe cold to strangers, but they are usually not this aggressive,
unless of course they are driving a caaa instead of walking. :-)

>b)  I do not behave as if I had a pickle up my rear end.

Try it you might like it :-)

>c)  I DO NOT TALK LIKE ELMER FUDD.

Neither do most native Bostonians, and you don't look like him either.

>(Also, the baby only says mamamamamam.  She occasionally says dadadadada, but
>I explain that we don't use language like that in our house.)

But if you continue to raise Queen Alice in Boston, she will be speaking the 
Queen's English (Boston accent) before too long.  What's a mama to do?

>Now don't make that mistake again.

Is this how they talk to strangers out in Ohio?

>Dawn

Karen
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: sms@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (steven.m.stein)
Subject: Re: About this: I Had Crabs With Steve
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:00:39 GMT

In article <1992Jul30.141053.8388@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>
>I'm Sorry Folks, but doesn't this belong in alt.sex or sci.medicine?????
>
>I mean really, body lice are not half as much
>trouble as they use to be, and its not like in
>the good old day when gasoline or cigarette lighter
>fluid was all that was available....
>ciao
>drieux
>
>
>ps: Oh, Its not those type of CRABS....
>	sorry....
>ppps: They made me post this...
>
>pppps: there is no pps:, as it was removed for health reasons.

Let me set the story straight once and for all.  Neither Nance
nor I initially had the crabs.  We actually got them from a third 
party.  This third party wasn't actually a participant in this
rendevous, but we both got the crabs from him.  He was personable
so getting the crabs wasn't a total disappointment.

				Steve
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Don't try this at home!!
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 04:50:11 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

If you value your current state of mind, do NOT get drunk and pull
out the classical music.  It gets you twisted.  Good twisted, but
maybe better twisted than you can handle.  Your cat will think
you're absolutely nuts (but then she's never trusted you anyway).

Just don't.  I'll be the poster child.  "Poor Rob was never the
same after that.  We just never could get the smile off'n his face."

Tomorrow is going to be real damned interesting when it gets here!
I wonder where my e.e.cummings anthology went.

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Heaven knows / No frontiers
And I've seen heaven in your eyes			- Jimmy McCarthy
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max)
Subject: Re: seeking higher ground
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 14:27:08 GMT

In article <7LZgoB2w164w@depsych.Gwinnett.COM> dy@depsych.Gwinnett.COM (Dr. Yes) writes:

>
>What kind of "schools" do women go to?  Arts and crafts?  When you
>stop to think about it most classes that are _about_ something are
>attended mostly by males.
>

Anybody else get maybe a glimmering of why this guy might have a difficult
time meeting/attracting women?

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: pjb4288@ultb.isc.rit.edu (Pete - Toonatic - Boulay)
Subject: Articles Needed on Homosexuality vs ROTC programs
Originator: pjb4288@ultb
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 22:13:14 GMT

Hi,
    I'm on our school's Commission for Promoting Pluralism and I have been
given a near-difficult task.

I am trying to gather information on other campus' dealings with ROTC
and their ban on homosexuals and bisexuals.

We're going to hold a panel discussion on October 30, 1992 on this issue
and are trying to inform the Commission further on this controversy.

If anyone has articles, papers, essays, etc on this topic, please send them
to my snailmail address listed below. In return, I'll send you further info
on our panel as members are selected.

This was posted in numerous places for maximum coverage on the net.

Thank you in advance,

Peter J. Boulay/17 Split Rock Rd/Pittsford, NY 14534
-- 
Peter J. Boulay --17 Split Rock Road-Pittsford, NY 14534-The ToonAddict!
Email should be sent only to PJB4288@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Disclaimer: You don't like what I'm writing? Oh well.
"Well shut my mouth wide open!"- Tiny Toons HISMV
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: smith@comm.mot.com (Jeff Smith)
Subject: Re: Morality- Alarming results
Organization: Gagging Sloth Records
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 20:03:47 GMT

|> In article <1992Jul29.035035.16360@zooid.guild.org> Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org> writes:
|> >But it wasn't a perfectly fine activity, people were dying.  It may be
|> >suprising but 55 *does* save lives.  If you don't believe me come to
|> >Canada were the speed limit is 100km/h (60 mph), 110km/h in some areas,
|> >and the police (in Ontario) won't pull you over for speeding unless your
|> >doing over 120km/h.  As a result we have some of highest accident rates
|> >in the world.  

This is a misinterpretation of the statistics. The only meaningful statistic
here is deaths per mile traveled, *NOT* total traffic-related deaths at a
given speed. It just so happens that traffic-deaths per mile travelled have
*NOT* varied significantly since the 65 mph laws were enacted. (Don't ask me
for my source, I threw out my huge stack of magazines when I moved :-(

jds

***************************************************************************
                               * Health and knowledge and wealth and power,
Jeff Smith                     * Passion and poems and sex
smith@fl08-g.comm.mot.com      * I wear a smile like a leather glove,
                               * I won't shut my mouth for less.
                                                - shriekback
***************************************************************************
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart)
Subject: Re: Fraternities (was: Re: E.W.- Average age of subscribers)
Organization: my opinions only
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 22:24:45 GMT

This program posts news to thousands of machines throughout the entire civilized
world, as well as USC.  Your message will cost the net hundreds if not thousands
of dollars to send everywhere.  Please be sure you know what you are doing.

Are you absolutely sure that you want to do this? [ny]

In article <l7bbrjINN8b7@skat.usc.edu> tarra@skat.usc.edu (Frat Boy) writes:
>In article <13734@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>>In article <1992Jul24.232017.9617@fid.morgan.com> sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
>>|In article <l6oufuINNphm@skat.usc.edu> tarra@skat.usc.edu (Frat Boy)
>>|writes:

>Well if you or that annoyance of a little geek Seth would ever read one of 
>my posts without the attitude that "because you are both little nerds that
>never were socially successful in life, that you must be smarter than someone
>that goes to a good school known for its attractive women and wild parties"

I don't know where to begin.  First, you must find the truth very
annoying.  Second, there's apparently a major syntactical error in
your statement; are you claiming that we feel we are "little nerds
that..." or that you are?  The language implies the latter, while the
ideas imply the former.  I'll assume you mean the former.

I'll just point out that my definition of a "good school" is one known
for academic excellence, not one known for "attractive women and wild
parties".

>than maybe you would both stop making ignorant comments about what you think
>I'm saying and write about what is actually in my post.

Which is precisely what I did.  It is irrelevant to his opinion of
fraternity members whether or not he has ever expressed that opinion
to (or at) them.

>  I asked about the 
>twerp comments to show just what kind of guy made the post.  He was probably
>one of you guys hiding in a dorm room from girls that didn't frequent the
>SUN labs making stupid comments about fraternities that in Seth's own words
>he could know nothing about because he wasn't in one.

Back when I was in college, my dorm room wasn't exactly a good place
to hide from women.

>  I am not threatening,
>nor am I attempting to be so.

This time.  Should I quote your email again?

>  As far as your technique
>of talking about me and not to me goes it is a little bit childish.

Considering that thousands of people read this, perhaps addressing the
many is better than addressing the one.

Seth		sethb@fid.morgan.com
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Define "FEMININE" anything goes...
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 12:46:00 GMT

In article <1992Jul27.234709.1375@lub001.lamar.edu> lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu writes:
>What does "Feminine" mean to you?
>
>[ANYTHING GOES]
 
    ^------ How exciting.
 Feminine means Bathsheba and the Orient.
 
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>INTERNET: LAIRDPG@LUB001.LAMA.EDU           |       PRACTICE SAFE HEX -
>these are my views- not my employers views! |     USE A WRITE PROTECT TAB!
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 Why does your employer want to know this?

 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: browns@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Stuart Brown)
Subject: Re: Don't try this at home!!
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 20:22:00 GMT

In article <thurlow.711780611@convex.convex.com> thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
>If you value your current state of mind, do NOT get drunk and pull
>out the classical music.  It gets you twisted.  Good twisted, but
>maybe better twisted than you can handle.  Your cat will think
>you're absolutely nuts (but then she's never trusted you anyway).
>
>Just don't.  I'll be the poster child.  "Poor Rob was never the
>same after that.  We just never could get the smile off'n his face."
>
>Tomorrow is going to be real damned interesting when it gets here!


That ain't nothin' compared to the twist that sharing a joint while listening
to Santana's "Abraxis" will give your brain.  That was one of the most 
inescapable seduction sceens of my life - even though we both knew it was a
bad idea, the pleasure vortex just sucked us in.

I've never been able to deal with short, curvaceous red headed women since
then without this knowing smile passing across my face.  [It doesn't help
that I saw a dead ringer for that woman -only maybe sexier- playing Ultimate
in Minneapolis last weekend.]

	-Stu

-- 
Stuart M. Brown                               Postdocs rush in where wise men
U. of Manitoba, Dept. Plant Science, Canada       Fear to tread. 
browns@ccu.umanitoba.ca        
				Disclaimer?? Sure: "That Disc is Mine!"
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Used threads
Keywords: Bill Bixby 
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 17:48:03 GMT

In article <ewillims.711803388@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>
>What about when delivery men/plumbers/electricians promise that they'll
>arrive at 09:00 am to deliver/mend/fix as promised and then, because they
>assume you're a "housewife" with nothing better to do with your life , they
>turn up several hours later with a really smirking attitude and THEN ask to
>borrow your phone, which YOU have to pay for, to ring their office to 
>have a chat. IT STEAMS ME!

Actually, I have the same problem with deliveries, repairs, pickups, etc.
I figure they just assume I'm a CEO with nothing better to do with my
life.  (Sometimes it seems like I'm doing well if they show up on the
correct day or my trade show display ends up in the correct state.)

in <MARTINC.92Jul22113603@grover.cs.unc.edu>
    Charles R. Martin writes
 
> Don't you all think these problems would be solved if you just grew
> about 10 inches and gained 75 pounds?

Weeell, I don't know if that would make the shipping people any more
punctual, but it would make answering the door lots more fun.  (Have
to get a taller front door for proper effect, though.)

Trygve    ("You rang?")
From: lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Something pink perhaps......
Date: 28 Jul 92 00:00:26 +1700
Organization: Lamar University - Beaumont

How about a new thread....Something pink, perhaps <<<  VERY EVIL GRIN  >>>
From: mits.mdata.fi!jjj@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: long hair
Date: 22 Jul 92 23:34:00 GMT
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In article <711665127snx@walter.UUCP> fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter) writes:
>I've had relationships with women like that. Low self-esteem. Bad 
self-image.
>Desperate. One is better off remaining celibate :-/

I just had to cut my hair myself because she "wasn't so sure if she
could do it...". Sheesh.

I also went to two opticians looking for glasses:

-Hi. I'd like to get glasses which would make me look more like a
tight-minded business professional.

-Uhmm. Well, here we got all of them...just go ahead and try them,
you've got freedom of choice!

GOD! Where did all the OPINIONS go? Yes I do have a more clear than just
a shallow idea of what I'm looking for in glasses or what length I'd
like my hair most, but I'd also like to hear what OTHER people think.

Do I just miss all those grandma/grandpa-style salesmen.

Maybe I'd need a grandma for girlfriend, too.

-- 
jjj@mits.mdata.fi             Kirjoitatko sin{ n{it{ ihan selvin p{in?
jjj@niksula.hut.fi                          -Petteri J{rvinen
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: pw@panix.com (Paul Wallich)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 16:43:50 GMT
Organization: Trivializers R Us

In article <ewillims.712237720@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>In <MARTINC.92Jul25123104@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Jul25.154754.24701@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>
>>   Well I'm around undergraduate and even graduate age guys all day and not
>>   one of them sets me to wondering what it would be like....... They all look
>>   so, so young. 
>
>>Frightening, isn't it -- I remember that first year of medical school I
>>sat through.  Those kids are all *doctors* now.
>
>>They aren't *old* enough to be doctors.
>
>	More to the point, remember when you've seen them falling out of 
>a pub/bar absolutely wasted and thought to yourself..."Oh God, this is
>the future generation of the medical profession....one day my life may be 
>in their hands". (*SHUDDER*) Scary thought isn't it!

Better than looking at the behavior of the young folk who you know will
grow up to be lawyers, stockbrokers or congresscritters. (Gee, I wonder
what happened to the guy in my class who wanted to be a congressional
staffer so he could "get $40K a year and f--- all the secretaries" ? He's
probably deciding our fate even as you read this.)

paul


Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max)
Subject: Re: Define "FEMININE" anything goes...
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:46:38 GMT

In article <1992Jul28.124600.10453@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <1992Jul27.234709.1375@lub001.lamar.edu> lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu writes:
>>What does "Feminine" mean to you?
>>
>>[ANYTHING GOES]
> 
>    ^------ How exciting.
> Feminine means Bathsheba and the Orient.
> 
Feminine means skimpy silk undies underneath blue jeans


Newsgroups: soc.singles