HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: andrewf@kralizec.zeta.org.au (Andrew Fong)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Diane Keaton/Diana Rigg fan seeks addresses - help!
Date: 13 Nov 92 00:47:27 GMT
Organization: Kralizec Dialup Unix Sydney: +61-2-837-1183 V.32

aroe@jarthur.claremont.edu (Lumiere) writes:


>Isn't Diana Rigg dead?
She visited Australia a year or two ago. So I don't think she's passed away
yet.

>--> Just another Avengers fan

Here in Sydney, their repeating the Diana Rigg Avengers episodes weekly.
YEAH!!!!!!!


					Andrew

*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
|              Andrew Fong -- itinerent student and programmer           |
|                        andrewf@kralizec.zeta.org.au                    |
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
Organization: Junior, Art, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.animation,rec.arts.disney
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 20:33:35 -0500 
From: "Jason S. Peltz" <jp4x+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: ALADDIN INSIGHT
Distribution: na

Proceed only if you've already seen it!!











Watching the opening scene of Aladdin,  I recognized William's voice as
the peddlar.  Much of what he said involved things not being what they
seemed.  He was trying to sell THE lamp.  At the end,  upon being freed,
 the genie leaves with the lamp,  not responsible to be anyone elses
master,  but still possesing his powers.  I believe the peddlar at the
beggining was not only Williams,  but it was aslo the genie,  he also
had many of the facial features of the genie when doing impressions. 
Anyone else agree?

Jason
jp4x
From: darrenl@natinst.com (Darren Lilie)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: A problem with Indiana Jones part 3
Date: 17 Nov 1992 10:13:08 -0600
Organization: National Instruments, Austin, TX
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: eagle.natinst.com

In article <1992Nov17.142313.1690@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU writes:
>In <1e99pmINNmvk@eagle.natinst.com> darrenl@natinst.com (Darren Lilie) writes:
>
>>Also, when I saw the old man in the knight suit, I thought, "Yeah, right".
>
>So you obviously didn't buy into the premise of the film, why did you
>bother to stay and watch it then?
>
Because the movie was almost over when they showed this part.

Another thing I wanted to mention is that not long after IJ part 3 was out
MacGyver had a show that was about looking for the Holy Grail.  I knew they wererunning out of ideas for the series already because they also had a show
about a baby(or maybe a young child) getting trapped in a well..Sound familiar?

Darren


     

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.comics.misc
From: phd85@seq1.keele.ac.uk (D.H. Holden)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: OLDMAN WAS A SEXY VAMP--NOT! (SPOILER)
Date: 21 Nov 92 13:31:32 GMT
Organization: Keele University, England

From article <Cindy_Bale-201192140517@134.56.140.224>, by Cindy_Bale@net.com (Cindy Bale):
> In article <00963B4A.2DF8D7E0@vms.csd.mu.edu>, 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
> wrote:
>> 
>> In article <BxtL5C.HB8@inews.Intel.COM>, mdouglas@cad067.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Maria Douglas ) writes:
>> >
>> >-- 
>> >O.K. folks.  Here's my opinion (hold on):
>> >
[ stuff deleteds]
> 
> I also suggest that the only other character worth watching for her
> sexuality was the Lucy character as played by Sadie (?) in her first movie
> role.  Very impressive! 


    Apparently, the Lucy character is played by Martin Kemp's wife.
    i,e, the guy from the group Spandau Ballet. Who was also in the
    film the cray twins.

	  Dave.
--
                                                                     

phd85@uk.ac.keele.seq1
keele university.
From: han-esther@yale.edu (Esther Han)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Planet of the Apes
Date: 16 Nov 1992 15:21:10 -0500
Organization: BB&MM&ST Fan Club
	<1992Nov15.110820.322@news.uwyo.edu>
	<1992Nov16.151719.4793@b8.b8.ingr.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: minerva.cis.yale.edu
In-reply-to: anthony@panzer.b17b.ingr.com's message of Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:17:19 GMT


In article <1992Nov16.151719.4793@b8.b8.ingr.com> anthony@panzer.b17b.ingr.com (Anthony Shipman) writes:

:) No offense, but if you've read the book I'd think it would only emphasize the
:) genius of Serling's adaptation. I read the book and thought it stunk. Really just
:) plain boring. Serling did much more with the idea in his screenplay. I think all
:) the best innovations were NOT in the book.
:) 
:) Anthony
:) 

Are you kidding?  I thought the book was about twenty times better and more
interesting than the movie.  Did you get through the whole book?  There was
more suspense, and an even more shocking ending than in the movie.  I saw the
ending in the movie a mile away (though I had already read the book and
expected something different).

--
--Est :)                       ()_()             O\ (0)___(0) /O
han-esther@yale.edu             (_)              \ \(  ...  )/ /
han@minerva.cis.yale.edu                        (((   d | b   ))) 
picard@pop.cis.yale.edu        TTFN!		    		  (Pahl-jjahk!)
-- 
--
Klingons do not surrender.
    -- Worf, "The Emissary", stardate 42901.3
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: firestar@leland.Stanford.EDU (Lipton Ann Meredith)
Subject: Re: Extended versions on T.V.
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 16:47:10 GMT


Well, though the TV version of this movie SUCKS because of all they chopped, 
Breakfast Club gets extra footage.  So does Superman II, and sometimes Foul
Play, depending on which station you watch it.

Firestar
-- 
I don't bite, you know.    | Find me and turn thy | It is better to have loved 
Unless it's called for.    | back on heaven.      | and lost than to have your
-- Audrey Hepburn, Charade | -- R. W. Emerson     | finger caught in a blender.
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mvburke@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (mary virginia burke)
Subject: Re: Cheesy monsters (was Re: Brief review of Dracula)
Organization: Indiana University
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 04:37:14 GMT



>drwho@wpi.WPI.EDU (Eric Ant Von Laudermann) writes:
>>Ok, all you folks out there in net land, what movies have you seen that 
>>featured a monster which doesn't look "cheesy"?  (Sounds like the Subject 
>>line of another unending thread to me!:-)

Um..._Pumpkinhead_.  Really.  And I thought the one in _The Hidden_ was
pretty good too, sort of The Escargot from Hell...:-).

Cheers--MVB

"Cute little vermin, ja?"--Van Helsing
From: jseaver@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Jason John Seaver)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Malcolm X controversies
Date: 18 Nov 1992 00:40:57 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <2B095FD9.13757@news.service.uci.edu> assist@orion.oac.uci.edu (ASSIST Coordination Site) writes:
>
>>In article <=qt1x1_@rpi.edu> kimp@rpi.edu (Phil Kim) writes:
>
>>>I heard that some people are protesting against the opening of X.  Any
>>>one know why?
>>
>Because there are alot of ignorant, small-minded people out there
>who believe that just because a film is made about African Americans
>that some sort of violence or "trouble" will be incited if the film
>is shown.  There are also some people objecting to the flag burning
>and Rodney King beating shown at the beginning of the film.  Perhaps
>they just cannot stand being faced with the reality of the society
>they live in and they prefer to maintain the illusion of their
>own little "sheltered" world.  Either way, I think it is reprehensible
>that where or how often ANY movie is shown would be determined by the
>ethnicity of the actors involved or by issues addressed in the movie
>that are "less than comfortable" to the general public.  This is
>censorship, plain and simple.

	No, it's not.  Censorship is when the government orders something to
be changed or excised or forbids it from being released.  This is people
trying to influence their (privately owned) local theater.  Although I
consider that to be obnoxious, it's not censorship.

					-Jay
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: roland@quadsys.com (Roland Besserer)
Subject: Re: Eberts DRACULA review
Organization: QUAD Systems
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 22:42:30 GMT

In article <4js1b-b@rpi.edu> kimp@rpi.edu (Phil Kim) writes:
>In article <BxoHxs.GBA@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> kpapai@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Ken Papai) writes:
>>Just read Roger Ebert's review that he posted on CompuServe.  He likes
>>the movie.  He loves its look.  I can't wait.  I've been waiting since
>>I first heard of Coppola's project 10 months ago.
>
>Well, what did he say?


Then again, you also gave a thumbs up to 'Passenger 57' which I had the
displeasure of seeing yesterday. With '57', the 'Die Hard' ripoffs have
reached a new low. Not even worth the $3.50 matinee admission and a
complete waste of time. I generally don't agree with most of Siskel's 
reviews, but he was right on the money this time.

The plot (what plot?) is full of gaping holes; some ol' action sequences;
awful dialog; bad acting; bad stereotyping ... Save your money.
-- 

Roland Besserer
QUAD Systems
roland@quadsys.com
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:33502 rec.arts.tv:22523
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:39:40 EST
From: Windsor A. Morgan <NHT@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Jack Webb of "Dragnet"

Is there a good source of information on Jack Webb?  I have never seen
him in anything except for various "Dragnet" incarnations.  What
motivated him to create "Dragnet", and to star, direct, and produce
it?

I remember reading once that the Los Angeles Police Department
"retired" his character's badge number (714).  The TV show indicates
that the LAPD worked closely with the show, as well.  Did Webb have
any connection with law enforcement besides this?


'Verily, there be no leader as wise as the Vision!'
                         Windsor Morgan (wmorgan@stsci.edu OR NHT@PSUVM.BITNET)
                         Space Telescope Science Institute
                         Baltimore, MD   21218
From: 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: DRACULA's Dr. Seward(Richard E. Grant)
Date: 19 Nov 1992 17:31:28 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

In article <1992Nov18.000121.8075@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>, ieng_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (innlingeng) writes:
>Can someone please email me the section of the Actor's List for
>Richard E. Grant?  I know I have seen him in L.A. Story, but I
>would like to know what other films he has been in, and if anyone
>knows of any information on him.  Has anyone caught him in any
>TV interviews?  It is a good thing to mix in more British actors in
>American films, e.g. Gary Oldman and Anthony Hopkins in Dracula...
>and other films that I wont rack my brain to name.
>

He was in The Player (I think).  He played the scriptwriter who pitches 
the idea about the movie which is supposed to be a tragedy where the woman 
dies (and where no major stars were supposed to appear) but which turns into
an all-star-happy-ending piece.  He was very funny.

Mary H.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: faa@athena.cs.wayne.edu (Felicitas A. Atabong)
Subject: Re: Malcolm X controversies
Organization: Wayne State University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:16:40 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.204812.4531@hubcap.clemson.edu> jmauric@eng.clemson.edu writes:
>yeah. malcolm x was a drug dealer in his younger days and spike lee has seens of
>this in his movie. i guess some blacks think malcolm x was god and never did
>anything bad.
>

'Was God and never did anything bad??' REALLY?? I am black, but I always
thought he was a REBEL 'WITH A CAUSE'.

Feli.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: danwood@netcom.com (Daniel J Wood)
Subject: Re: spike lee & boston celtics
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 00:57:15 GMT

reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher) writes:

>By the way, if people are skipping his films because they don't like
>Lee personally, you are missing some very good films.  Regardless of
>whether you agree with him, Lee is a talented filmmaker whose films 
>don't resemble anyone else's.  There is strong artistic merit in Lee's
>films, and those serious about film are making a mistake if they skip
>his films.

I agree completely. Let the work speak for itself. I just saw the film, and it
was easily one of the best movies I've ever seen. Who ever would have thought
that you'd be able to see very recognizeable spike lee-isms in an EPIC.
Definitely recommended for all.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: hempling@quorum.com (David B. Hempling)
Subject: Re: BRAZIL: Gilliam's ending
Originator: hempling@parker
Organization: Quorum Software Systems, Inc.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 22:18:06 GMT

With all this talk about Gilliam's ending for Brazil, I 
thought I might share the following: 

A few months ago, I happened upon a script for Brazil. I looks
like a draft that falls somewhere between Gilliam's idea and
the final script that's in the can. It contains notes listing
scenes that have been cut - their text is not in the script. It
also contains scenes that aren't in the movie and perhaps were
never even filmed. For instance, there are a few dream scenes in 
which Sam is a) stored in a filing cabinet, b) explores a sky with
trap doors, and c) enters a large, flying, concrete ship.

At any rate, here's the text of the very last scene, posted
without permission (so sue me):


    Scene 154  EXT.	HOUSE AND GARDEN	MORNING		154

    A high shot. Everything in the garden is definitely lovely.
    The music tells us. The music swells and the cameral slowly
    pulls back, and back. It's a happy ending. And then, in the
    foreground, TWO HUGE HEADS appear looking straight at the
    camera. It is MR HELPMAN and JACK. They both shake their
    heads.

			MR HELPMANN
		He's got away from us, Jack.

    CUT to their POV.

    SAM is sitting in the Information Retrieval chair. He is
    strapped in. His eyes are open but miles away. His face is 
    wreathed in a benign and very happy smile.

			JACK
		I'm afraid you're right, Mr.
		Helpmann. He's gone.

    A wide shot of the room shows us HELPMANN and LINT turn away
    and leave. SAM is left alone. He is humming. The camera
    pulls back and back. The Information Retrieval room with SAM
    in it floats away into the most beautiful glorious sky ever.

    SAM's humming swells into a full orchestra, and we hear...

       "Brazil, where hearts were entertained in June,
	We stood beneath an amber moon,
	And softly murmured, 'Some day soon',
	We kissed and clung together,
	Then, tomorrow was another day.
	The morning found me miles away,
	With still a million things to say,
	Now, when twilight beams the sky above,
	Recalling thrills of our love,
	There's one thing I'm certain of,
	Return, I will,
	To old Brazil."
From: lon@edsi.plexus.COM (Lon Ponschock)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Joan of Arc gossip
Summary: Repost
Date: 21 Nov 92 16:01:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: edsi.1992Nov21.160148.16030
Organization: Enterprise Data Systems Incorporated, Appleton WI


[previous cascade on the merits of Sinead O'Connor
 delightfully deleted.  :-)  ]

>I can't see her topping Falconetti's performance though.

==>  Which brings us around to my original question... a question 
which has been deleted from subsequent discussion, which is this:

        I posed the question of casting k.d. Laing and Lyle Lovette as 
the leads with Lovette playing the confessor (Antonin Artaud) part 
as it was written for the Carl Drier version.

        Normally I wouldn't do one of these Blue Sky Fantasy Films You 
Would Like To See things, but the time seems right to do something  
with Laing and Lovette.

        Any additional comments?

lon
-- 
   Question Recently
   Posed to the Net:'Kukla, Fran & Ollie' which one is which?
   Answer: Tom Servo is Kukla, Crooow is Ollie and Joel is Fran.
   lon@edsi.plexus.com
From: 2609cowend@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Zentropa
Date: 23 Nov 1992 05:13:32 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 2609cowend@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

I just caught this film in Milwaukee -- does anyone have any 
information on it, or its director Lars Von Trier?
 
This was definately one of the best movies I've seen all
year...I was enthralled.
 
Thanks!]
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Eschatfische  2609COWEND@VMS.CSD.MU.EDU |"Where all is bad...
----------------------------------------------| it must be good to
 D O N 'T  B E  F O O L E D.  NO ONE IS SAFE! | know the worst."
* "Good luck, bad luck, waiting in a line." * |  - the Art Of Noise
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
        "Opinions expressed are not that of my oppressors."
From: 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Robert Redford
Date: 16 Nov 1992 20:49:33 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

>
>Fellow-macho action-movie buds, hell. Arnold's a much better actor that many
>so-called serious actors, including: Mark Harmon, Frank Langella, Don Johnson,
>Bruce Willis (Well, nobody's ever accused him of being a serious actor), Warren
>Beatty, AND Robert Redford. That's right, I said Robert Redford! I'll scream it from
>the rooftops ... "This man Can't ACT! He plays every single role the same way!" 
>
>I don't care how good looking he is, he played Butch Cassidy (or was the Sundance
>kid?) the same way he played Gatsby, the same way he played Death (in that
>Twilight Zone episode). In other words, he can't act. Unless he is vain enough to
>think Death would be just like him.
>

I agree completely.  Watching "Out of Africa" was pure torture.  Robert 
Redford is amusing enough to watch given the right vehicle like The Sting,
or more recently Sneakers, but he is no actor.  This was glaringly obvious
to me watching the Sneakers scene where he is caught by the mathematician's
girlfriend in his office and tries to bluff his way out by pretending to be
a P.I.--he is totally unbelievable.  As much as I liked Sneakers, it really
pointed out that Ben Kingsley is an actor and RR is just a movie star.

Mary H.
From: csroc@dime.prime.com (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: REVIEW: CANDYMAN
Date: 16 Nov 92 13:20:01 GMT
Reply-To: csroc@dime.UUCP (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Organization: Prime Computervision, Bedford MA

In article <101610@bu.edu> nate@bu.edu (Nathan Auclair) writes:
>
>Phantom,   
>
>	Your review is too damn long! Shorten it, get a clue.

There's only one thing
that could get me to see this movie,
and a 288 line review and rebuttal ain't it.

Is Virginia Masden naked for any 
appreciable amount of time in this movie?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: af185@yfn.ysu.edu (Robin L. Gibson)
Subject: Re: spike lee &  boston celtics
Reply-To: af185@yfn.ysu.edu (Robin L. Gibson)
Organization: St. Elizabeth Hospital, Youngstown, OH
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:46:37 GMT


In a previous article, mattm@apple.com (Matthew Melmon) says:

>In article <1992Nov19.195319.27398@u.washington.edu>,
>il@bambam.u.washington.edu (Il Hwan Oh) wrote:
>
>I have the same problem with Lee (well, I also think his talent 
>somewhat less than, say, FFC...).  Anything and everything is 'racism.'
>Why didn't _Do the Right Thing_ win an Oscar?  Because it was primitive,
>dull, poorly-written, and of minor appeal?  No.  It was racism.  Lee's
>been crying about racism since a white doctor slapped his black butt.
                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cute, but don't assume it was a white doctor...

>His stories are contrived.  His characters are contrived.  His
>camera angles are contrived.  His sets are contrived.  He, himself,
>is contrived.
>
It's obvious you haven't seen _X_ and are talking out the side of your neck, to boot.
-- 
Robin L. Gibson          gibson@email.ncsc.navy.mil

Coastal Systems Station
Panama City, FL  32407-5000
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: roland@quadsys.com (Roland Besserer)
Subject: Re: Zentropa
Organization: QUAD Systems
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 22:58:44 GMT

>>
>>BUT! Can you explain the color usage? I've seen it twice and can't figure
>>out why color was used in certain shots and not others. There seems to be
>>no logic behind the use of color. What am I missing
>
>I haven't seen Zentropa yet, but this reminds me of Lindsay Anderson's If....
>That was shot in a mixture of color and B&W, too, and the critics had a field
>day over the various uses to which color/B&W were put, but it turned out that
>the company simply ran out of color film stock partway through and couldn't
>afford more, so they had to turn to B&W.
>
>Wayne

That would certainly explain it   :-)
-- 

Roland Besserer
QUAD Systems
roland@quadsys.com
From: jseaver@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Jason John Seaver)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: RISING SUN movie was Re: Jurassic Park Spoiler (almost)
Date: 16 Nov 1992 13:07:59 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <Bxs9vB.46M@acsu.buffalo.edu> v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey) writes:
>About RISING SUN, book and movie...:

>>>>>     That's okay: I thought Snipes' character was _white_.  :-)

>>>> 
>>>>	So did I.  Then again, I don't think he was ever explicitly mentioned

>>>     Agreed, considering the Japanese penchant for stamping everything
>>>     with the "RACIST" label in RISING SUN.  Seems like an easily
>>>     adaptable novel, and it's a good cast, so my hopes are high.
>>>     (Besides, Tia Carrere doesn't get to speak... we're home clear).

>>	Doesn't she?  I thought she was playing the college student the cops
>>talk to when they're trying to figure out whether or not the pictures were
>>doctored (not knowing who's cast for which part can make things difficult);
>>that character had a speaking part.

>     Dunno...  I just assumed she played "the body" of the victim.

	The "body" was, I think, explicitly mentioned as being a blonde white
girl.




Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: sewon@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (WAYNE WONG)
Subject: Re: Jackie Chan films
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 23 Nov 1992 17:32 EST  

In article <al194515.722015911@academ01>, al194515@academ01.mty.itesm.mx (Juan Carlos Garcia Martinez) writes...
>There is also an old film, the first I saw from him, called "The Fist of the Snake", but it's only good if you're a small kid. 
>Juan Carlos Garcia

The version I saw was titled something like "Snake-Fist Behind Eagle's 
Claw."  I WAS a kid when I saw it, and I DID enjoy it.  I would enjoy it 
still today.

I have not seen the previous posts, but here are some other Jackie Chan 
films:
- Snake-Fist Behind Eagle's Claw
- Drunken Genie
- The Master
- The Protector
- The Big Brawl
- Cannon Ball Run
- Cannon Ball Run II (I think, I didn't see it)
- Armor of God

These are all the titles I can remember offhand, but I know he has done many 
more.  Of these, I think the made-for-Hong-Kong movies were far superior to 
the ones that were targeted at an American audience.  The choreography and 
stunts are unbelievable.  Without fail, Jackie manages to seriously injure 
himself.  I just saw "Armor of God" this weekend, and I'm starting to 
wonder how long Jackie can keep it up; he's starting to look a bit old.  He 
still insists on doing all of his own stunts.

- Wayne.
 =========================================================================
    W     A     Y     N     E     .     A     .     W     O     N     G
 =========================================================================
                                                SEWON@LIMS01.LERC.NASA.GOV