From: jamalin@newton.ccs.tuns.ca (Nadeem Jamali)
Subject: Re: News
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 04:50:38 GMT
Organization: Technical University of Nova Scotia, Halifax, N.S.

In article <1992Dec14.034929.27202@usl.edu> zxs6373@usl.edu (Siddiqui Zafar) writes:
>In article <1992Dec13.190617.15766@newton.ccs.tuns.ca> jamalin@newton.ccs.tuns.ca (Nadeem Jamali) writes:
>>In article <1992Dec13.063257.28668@usl.edu> zxs6373@usl.edu (Siddiqui Zafar) writes:
>>>In article <1992Dec12.163734.66958@slate.mines.colorado.edu> imustafa@slate.mines.colorado.edu (MUSTAFA IBRAHIM ) writes:
>>>>
>>>>	Muslims in Pakistan offered Jumma Prayer in one of the 
>>>>	biggest temple in Sindh near Indus River.
>>>> 
>>>
>>>Pray tell me how does this act prove us muslims to be better than others???
>>>Its a shame.
>>>
>>>Zafar
>>>
>>
>>It's hard to to imagine why Indian Muslims cannot think positive. And BTW, it's
>>not "us Muslims"... The people who offered prayers in that temple have rejected
>
>Let me tell you one thing. I consider each and every muslim as my brethern in
>faith, let him belong to what ever country. 
>
>What part of my article suggested that I am not thinking in a positive manner?
>I just meant to say that what's so great in that?? Praying in a temple
>which was demolished. It is like doing sin on sin. The destruction of the
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Where did the news item say that they prayed in a temple which was demolished??
If you have confirmed such a thing, I'll be glad to take my words back... heck,
I'll even apologize. If without such knowledge you choose to make such 
assumptions, I must insist that you are being negative. I rest my case...

>temple itself was a great sin and now to add insult to injury they prayed on
>that site thereby giving rise to more hatred.
>
>
>>the idea of a religion-based nationhood. No wonder I relate better to Sindh's 
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Nadeem you amuse me! How can you be so naive to think that the guys who prayed
>there were in reality presenting the example of "rejecting the idea of
>a religion based nationhood".
>
>>Hindus than to Indian Muslims... and after reading Gopal Agarwal's response to
>>your remark, I'm pretty confident that I have more in common with Indian Hindus
>                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Atlast you admitted the fact!!!
>
>>than with Indian Muslims.
>
>Nadeem just say that you have more in common with the Indian Hindus than
>Muslims (dont say Indian muslims). Because Muslims all over the world follow
>the same religion and we don't have no differences. 
>
>
>>I'd say, one way to really teach these religious pandits (muslims or hindus or 
>>else) a lesson would be that all sensible people just switch their religions.
>
>Go ahead. Switch over to Hinduism. It wont make much of a difference. You 
>will be moving from one kufr to the other!
>

I wish I cared what you think... What you write above is devoid of much logical
reasoning and I don't want to respond to your personal attacks. I'll still pray
for you though....

>>
>>Nadeem
>>
>
>Zafar
>
>PS: the above comments not directed at hindus. 

Nadeem

-- 
Nadeem Jamali                                     jamalin@newton.ccs.tuns.ca
						 
School of Computer Science			  
Technical University of Nova Scotia		  (902)420-7527