From: gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: THE IMPLICATIONS OF ABORTION ON OUR SOCIETY
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 07:26:12 GMT

<1992Apr12.020819.7670@liebe.uucp> kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) said:
>gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
....
>>Why do you value a fetus so much?  I mean, what makes it so important to
>>you?  I personally think it's some sort of conditioning that results in
>>this 'fetus worship'.
>
>What makes you value your wife so much?

I know her.  I love her.  We share many common experiences, we share
similar viewpoints, we share many intimacies.  She is a kind, caring
person who works hard, is very trustful, and an honest person.  Not to
mention she is beautiful and loving.

>                                         After all, she's simply a mass
>of nourished "fetal tissue", dipshit.  

You really need to get out and meet women.  You are never going to get very
far in a relationship when all you can do is call them a "mass of
nourished fetal tissue".  When you have met that special person perhaps
you will understand the difference.

Oh, I almost forgot - Asshole!

>                                       "Conditioning"?  I conditioned
>myself to care for human life?  

Donated one of your redundant kidneys to someone who needs one?  Or do you
only care about "fetal life" that doesn't belong to you?

>                                Or was it YOU conditioned by society to
>disdain children?

I suppose being around squalling, smelly, messy babies would turn most
people off to children.  But seeing what they do to the human mind was the
final point for me.

>>>                              In any case, I apologize for my slip.
>>>I am not yet used to these odds of 10 to 1 in a political and ethical
>>>discussion. 
>
>>Kinda makes you wonder why the pro-life side keeps claiming numerical
>>superiority, doesn't it.  The abortion rallys tend to be 5 to 1 in favor
>>of pro-choice (at least, from what has been posted here), and the postings
>>here at at least 2 to 1 if not more.
>
>Pro-Lifers claim majority because it is exactly correct.  

Really?  Care to post some verifiable numbers?

>                                                          The abortion
>rally statement is outright fraud.  Last years march in DC had the Pro-
>Death faction outnumbered almost 2 to 1 (and the pro-death clowns still
>claimed a majority because they were relying on their own guesstimates
>instead of the park service's official count).

Well that explains it.  You're too fucking stupid to realize that there
isn't much of a "pro-death" movement in this country or we'd all be in
danger.  I would say that the pro-life crowd does indeed out number this
mythical pro-death movement.

Glad we cleared that up, now what does it have to do with abortion?

>                                                So you believe this
>system represents a perfect scientific cross-section of society?

What system?  This net?  No way, I was merely pointing out a fact. I
didn't make any social extrapolations.

>                                                                  Wake
>up buddy boy.  There is more to society than your computer.

Son, I would venture to say, judging by the tone and quality of your post,
that I've been out in the real world society perhaps longer than you've been
alive.  When you grow up your perspective changes.


Gordon
Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boyfriend of Susan,
Muriel, Cathi, and Nora, and married to the sweetest woman in the world,
and darn proud of it.
-- 

The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion