HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: chrisr@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Chris Ringe)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Ever Left a Supra on for 24 hrs ?
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 92 09:03:17 MST
Organization: Edmonton Remote Systems #1, Edmonton, AB, Canada

isc10192@nusunix1.nus.sg (KOH KHANG WEE) writes:

- Hi
- My question is
-
- Has Anyone left his Supra on for 24 hrs and lived to tell the tale ?
- I have a supra and it seems the problems lie with the power adapter and
- not the modem itself. The Adapter heats up so much until it is too hot
- to touch after five hours of usage, however the modem is still alright.
- What i am afraid is the Adapter burning up on me. Maybe someone can tell
- me about their experiences ?
-
- I'd appreciate it if the responses are not flames about supra, but
- genuine experiences.
-
- Please Email me if possible.
-
- Thanks in advance !
-
- Jerry

Sure, I leave it on ALL THE TIME (24 HOURS), and have NO problems.  The case
does heat up though.  I find that placing something (metal) on top of the case
helps disperse the heat further.  The one transister that they have heat sinked
to the case gets damn hot.

Chris Ringe       (VE6MCP)
St. Albert, Alberta, CANADA
MAIL: chrisr@ersys.edm.ab.ca
PHONE: (403) 460-PLAY/7529
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield)
Subject: Re: PEP over SLIP?
Organization: Morning Star Technologies
	<BOB.92Nov18175532@volitans.MorningStar.Com>
	<shvdb6c@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com>
	<sjsv1fo@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 04:58:42 GMT

In article <shvdb6c@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com> vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes:
   In article <BOB.92Nov18175532@volitans.MorningStar.Com>, bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes:
      Even with only a single FTP stream traversing the link in one
      direction, the returning TCP ACKs (even VJ-compressed) usually
      require a large PEP packet,

   Are you sure?  I thought the magic number was 12 bytes.  12 is much
   larger than any reasonable VJ-compressed ACK.

As it was explained to me by a protocol engineer at Telebit, who had
talked to the modem engineers, packets are sent when a timer ticks,
not when "enough" bytes arrive.  If few enough bytes are awaiting
transmission, they'll go in a micropacket (11 bytes), which doesn't
require that the line be turned around.  If more bytes than will fit
in a micropacket are awaiting transmission, they'll be sent in a large
packet (340 bytes), which requires a longer line turnaround process.
I even tried using their magical undocumented micro packet disabler
switch (AT~D1S500=12), which should instruct the modem to always use
small (43 bytes) packets, into which an ACK is more likely to fit, but
that only decreased throughput and increased latency.

      Performance (both throughput and latency) degrades under
      increased offered load much more catastrophically with PEP than
      with V.32bis.

   Are you sure?  From my experience, PEP does best when loaded.  It
   does worst with light traffic, such as interactive stuff.

I was thinking of simultaneous FTPs in both directions.  Both
throughputs suffer more than either of them does over a V.32bis
carrier.

In article <sjsv1fo@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com> vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes:
   These kinds of latencies happen in other circumstatnces.  For
   example, take a pair of Cisco routers and a 56K line.  Run a TCP
   based file transfer over the link between a pair of computers with
   60K TCP windows.  At the same time, try to do some interactive
   stuff.

I think cisco implements TOS queueing, but to get any benefit, you
need to run with small MTUs (thus sacrificing some throughput) so that
your high-priority interactive packets can squeeze ahead of the batch
stuff that's waiting to go.  If you have large MTUs, you won't be able
to get an interactive packet on the wire until the next moby FTP
packet is flying.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: T-3000 + Fax Upgrade
Keywords: T-3000 fax WorldBlaer upgrade
Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745 
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 14:19:27 GMT

ja@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jay Ashcraft) writes:

>I already have $850 in my WorldBlazer don't know if $149 more 
>for Fax is worth it?  Any ideas?

$149 is cheaper than a FAX machine, and modem high speed
FAX modems.  If you don't have any plans to use the FAX,
then no, it's not worth the upgrade fee.

The question is, does this $149 include any software?

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:16982 comp.os.ms-windows.apps:5014
From: MICHAELB@UCF1VM.BITNET (Michael `Anti-Microsoft' Brunetti)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.os.ms-windows.apps
Subject: Re: FOLLOWUP: Boca 14.4 and FAX..NOT!
Date: 18 Nov 92 03:50:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: UCF1VM.92322.225035MICHAELB
Organization: University of Central Florida--Computer Services


Boca's answer for everything is "It's the software!"  They must think the
cheesy-ass "software" that comes with it is the greatest... Honestly,
I've seen better software in the days of the Apple ][.  But, seriously
I bought PMFax for OS/2 and have had nothing but problems with this Boca

If they would acknowledge the problems, they might get fixed....

*************************************************************************
 Michael Brunetti                        an Anti-Bill Gates activist!
  Consultant                             Long Live OS/2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*************************************************************************
 michaelb@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu               University of Central Florida
  Computer Engineering Student            Orlando, FL
*************************************************************************
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Five Minute Beep Problems
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 15:44:08 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

barjun@leland.Stanford.EDU (ASHWIN BULCHANDANI) writes:

> The phone I use to dial in with my USR has a five minute timer beep i.e. afte
> I am on the phone for five minutes, it beeps.  Consequently, my USR loses
> the carrier and all is lost.  I know that some setting somewhere is supposed
> to adjust this, but I have not had any luck.
> 
> All suggestions/pointers to literature _greatly_ appreciated.

   Your S10 register can help.

   However, I'm willing to bet that, while you hear the beep, the other modem 
hears nothing... and *it* hangs up.  If *both* S10 registers are increased to 
14 or so (the default's usually 7), it may solve the problem. 

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
       You're still young if your wallet is exhausted before you are.
From: zeke@fasttech.com (Bohdan Tashchuk)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Any Digicom Scout+ bugs?
Date: 19 Nov 92 23:26:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: fasttech.1992Nov19.232611.6636
Organization: Fast Technology

In <1eflc8INN8ta@travis.csd.harris.com> mikem@travis.csd.harris.com (Mike McCole) writes:

>As Wolfgang has said, Prodigy is selling Digicom Scout+ external
>modems, Prodigy calls them "Eagles".  They come with a 30 day money back
>guarentee for $199.00 U.S.  I haven't seen ANY bug reports about the
>Digicom Scout+, this seems too good to be true.

Perhaps it IS too good to be true. Has this modem been "crippled" in any way,
or is it the standard Digicom product?

Wolfgang, are you SURE it is the standard product?

Since Fraudigy usually offers some "free" connect time with a modem purchase,
this could be a cheap way of buying one for Unix use but also trying their
service for free.
From: chip@inter.interzone.ch (Marc Liyanage)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Can't get mail to Supra's email-address
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 15:50:49 CET
Organization: Interzone Switzerland
Reply-To: chip@interzone.ch
Distribution: world
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.5v4


Hi!

I've tried to send email to supra at supra@supra.uucp but didn't get
through. Is this address valid?

I got this message back:

> From mcsun!tessi!uucp  Wed Nov 18 15:45:36 1992 remote from chsun.chuug.ch
> Received: by inter.interzone.ch (uA-1.5v4); Thu, 19 Nov 92 15:46:01 CET
> Received: from mcsun.UUCP by chsun.chuug.ch (5.65c8/1.34)
> 	id AA14406; Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:06:25 +0100
> Received: by mcsun.EU.net via EUnet
> 	id AA16935 (5.65b/CWI-2.187); Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:04:54 +0100
> Received: from uunet.uu.net (via LOCALHOST.UU.NET) by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
> 	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA27952; Thu, 19 Nov 92 09:02:05 -0500
> Received: from mntgfx.UUCP by uunet.uu.net with UUCP/RMAIL
> 	(queueing-rmail) id 085927.9403; Thu, 19 Nov 1992 08:59:27 EST
> Received: by pdx.MENTORG.COM ( 5.52 (84)/DontTreadOnMe)
> 	id AA18466; Thu, 19 Nov 92 01:44:30 PST
> From: chsun.chuug.ch!tessi!uucp
> Received: from guardian.tessi.com by tessi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
> 	id AA01942; Wed, 18 Nov 92 23:45:36 PST
> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 23:45:36 PST
> Message-Id: <9211190745.AA01942@tessi.com>
> Subject: Undeliverable Mail
> Apparently-To: inter!chip
> 
> This mail message is undeliverable.
> (Probably to or from system 'hpupora')
> It was sent to you or by you.
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
> 
> 	Sincerely,
> 	guardian!uucp

[rest was original message]




Thanks for any help.

-Marc


____________________________________________________________
Marc Liyanage   Internet: chip@interzone.ch
                Papernet: CH-9552 Bronschhofen,  Switzerland 
                ICBM-Net: 47 29 17 N / 009 03 41 E / ALT 578
                Voicenet: +41 73 22 1196
From: cm119@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Carlos Dominguez)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: FOLLOWUP: Boca 14.4 & Fax.. Maybe
Date: 18 Nov 1992 17:17:12 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I received a call from Boca this morning.. They made arrangements
to ship me a new BOCA 14.4 in exchange for the one I possess now..
 
Eclipse still hasn;t called me back..

I tried installing eclipse as a class 1 faxmodem and I was able
to send at high speed, but not receive at all... kept on
getting communication error and it would abort.
 
Hopefully it was a hardware defect and will go awayt with the
new modem..
--



************************************
  ,_,           carlos@dorsai.com  
  /oo \  _.-.   FIDO 1:278/706     
  <>__| /- O O                     
  |  U|    \|   Ren & Stimpy '92   
                                   
  For all postings and such junk   
  the views I express are my own.. 
************************************
-- 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: simon@wotangate.sc.ti.com (Jean-Yves Simon)
Subject: Re: SatisFAXtion 400 - prob. with getting inco
Reply-To: simon@wotangate.sc.ti.com
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc.
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 02:03:48 GMT


In article 1@postman.hsn.no, hew@postman.hsn.no (Hermann Westlie) writes:
>Can anybody help me solve a problem with my SatisFAXtion 400 modem. I have 
>problem with receving incomming calls from modems. It works well with 
>incomming and outgoing FAXs and outgoing modem calls.
>
>I use a shared line for FAX/modem and Voice calls. The modem picks up the 
>phone when I get an incomming call, but it handle incomming modem calls the 
>same way as incomming voice calls.

if you have installed the software with option 1 or 2, the modem which is calling you
has to issue a # after your number. In that case, your modem will not that it is a modem
call. The other solution is to use the wall phone, nor the one plugged in your modem, 
and issue yourself a #. After the 400 answers, you can hang up the phone.
Not a very smart interface, but it works for me all the time now. It was hard to pick up
the trick!
Hope this helps.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: garion@selway.umt.edu (Jason Curnow)
Subject: Experience with Digicom?
Keywords: digicom, v.32bis, scout
Organization: University of Montana
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 23:58:44 GMT

I'm in the market for a v.32bis modem, and saw that they had one
at Software Etc. today, and wanted to know if anyone has used them
at all..  The brand name is Digicom and model is Scout Plus.  It's a 
full v.32bis modem w/ send and receive fax for $199.  Sounds like a pretty
good deal to me unless it has a lot of problems like the Telepath.
If you have had any experience with this particular modem, or the brand
at all, I would love a quick mail message telling me your thoughts.  
Thanks in advance!

- Jason


-- 
- Jason Curnow                       University of Montana
  garion@selway.umt.edu              CIS Consulting
  con_jpc@lewis.umt.edu              (406) 243-2975, LA 40
From: kodagali@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: TELEBIT Trailblazer Plus(Help??)
Date: 17 Nov 92 15:45:17 GMT
Article-I.D.: wsuhub.1992Nov17.094517.412
Organization: Wichita State University, Wichita, Ks

Hi,
  I am a novice in the area of modems. I have a TELEBIT TrailBlazer Plus
modem(model T2SAA). I am using it on a 386 PC running Microsoft Windows.
The communication program that I use is PROCOMM PLUS ver. 2.01.

I usually dial in to my university which supports 9600 baud rate. But
whenever I dial in I seem to connect at only 2400 baud! 
The S50, S51, S94, S90, S91 register setting are:

S50 = 000
S51 = 005
S94 = 001
S90 = 000
S91 = 000

In order to make a 9600 baud connection what values should these registers
have?? I tried setting S50 = 255(FAST operation, PEP Mode), it does not 
seem to make any difference.

Help.....

Thanks,
--------------------------------------------------------
Email : kodagali@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: jhughes@netcom.com (Jay Micheal Hughes)
Subject: RE: USR Sporster Question
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 02:13:17 GMT


In article <1992Nov17.220726.9720@news.acns.nwu.edu> jlacour@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (John Lacour) writes:
>In article <1ebcfdINN62n@uwm.edu> rlippert@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Ryan Jon Lippert) writes:
>>I'm sure EVERYONE knows about the Sportster PROBLEM(?!) be able to have
>>a FULLY working Dual with just a few AT commands. What I wanna know is,In the
>>NEW version of the modem (After 4.1) did they change anything BESIDES the
>>Roms???? Like the mother-board or something.? Well if you know I'de be REAL
>>glad if u responded... thanks..
>
>I wouldn't advise you waste your time trying to duplicate the 4.1 supervisor
>ROM.
>
>Regards,
>--
>John A. LaCour III, Technical Support                      +1 708 982 5151
>USRobotics, Inc.                                       FAX +1 708 933 5552
>8100 N. McCormick Blvd.                           
>Skokie, IL  60076                              jlacour@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
>
>USR Email:      jlacour_+a_robopost_+ljohn_lacour+r%usrobotics@mcimail.com

hehe, what else would you expect from USR???

BTW, you CAN copy the ROM's, and NO I HAVE NOT DONE THIS!!!  I got
my 4.1's legit, from USR....

no flames pleezzzzz

Jay

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
jhughes@netcom.com               |    | Do NOT write below this |
318-361-5067                     |    |   line OFFICE USE ONLY  |
Monroe, LA                       |    |-------------------------|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: ged@phantom.cs.hut.fi (Camillo S{rs)
Subject: Supra Silent Answer
Reply-To: Camillo.Sars@hut.fi
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, CS lab
Distribution: comp
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 11:45:29 GMT

Could someone tell me what command to put in the init string to get
silent answer in a Supra V.32bis? The ability to use silent answer is
included in the 1.200H version, but the small leaflet doesn't mention
how to turn it on. I've noticed that the modem listens on the line,
but it still sends RING messages...

For those who don't know what silent answer is, it's the capability to
listen for CNG tones on the phone line and not send RING messages
unless they are present. This means you can have a voice/answering
machine line combined with the fax modem. I would like that very much,
as it would allow me to leave my fax software on all the time, waiting
for possible incoming faxes.

Please answer by e-mail, too.

--
ged@hut.fi                   Amiga 500 // Aim for the impossible and you
ged@niksula.cs.hut.fi             2.04//   will achieve the improbable.
Department of Computer Science    \\ //
Helsinki University of Technology  \X/		PGP key available
From: sabre@quantum.sas.upenn.edu (Andrew White)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ZyXEL voice using microphone
Date: 21 Nov 92 01:00:02 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

FYI, Tyronne of Zyxel tech support told me today that Zyxel is in
the process of producing adapters for the RJ11 jack in the back
of the 1496x series of modems so that a microphone can be hooked
up for voice recording.  He neither confirmed nor denied the rumor
that the "headphone" connection seen on some newer modems (?) will
be used for audio output.

However, given the ability of the modem to record to disk and play
from disk, a Soundblaster or similar sound card should be able to
do the trick.

If anyone has hacked a microphone hookup to the Zyxel, I'd like to
hear from you.  Also, has anyone tried hooking a speaker up to the
points on the motherboard labeled "headphone"?  If so, what happened?
-- 
Andrew White                  |  Dod #0584
sabre@quantum.sas.upenn.edu   |  '82 Honda Sabre v45       
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: leec4@rpi.edu (CD LEE)
Subject: Re: Info on: Infotel, Zoom, or Zyxel
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 01:49:04 GMT

In article <of0I6dO00Uh_444ltZ@andrew.cmu.edu>, Kwan-Ju Chen
<kc2x+@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> 
> I agree ZyXEL is a better modem.
> 
> I dumped my SUPRA v32bis.

Could anyone success to send the fax from ZyXEL at Mac?
If you did, how and what program you use.

CD LEE, Chun-Da Lee                                 leec4@rpi.edu
ITS Consultant, ITS=Information Technology Service  CD_Lee@MTS.RPI.EDU
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
From: keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith Smith)
Subject: Re: telebit trailblazer
Organization: Keith's Computer, Hope Mills, NC
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 20:44:54 GMT

In article <iP5VTB3w165w@zswamp.UUCP> geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh) writes:
>jms@informix.com (Jack Stephens) writes:
>
>> I finally got my WB a week or so ago, and have things configured so
>> that all the nice little lights light after an interminable handshake
>> sequence, but WB <--> WB I'm only seeing ~900 CPS.
>> 
>> The far end is a sun, I'm running a 486 with nothing else going on and the
>> serial port locked at 38.4 but the send/recieve lights are only cycling
>> at ~10 Hz.
>> 
>> Obviously, I've missed something among the myriad of registers.
>
>   Is it possible that you've overlooked S111=30?

and S50=255 to force a PEP connection, or various others to force MNP
instead of V.42/LAPM.  Note: if V.32 tones come first the modems will
connect V.32 unless S50 says otherwise.  Also they'll GO LAPM if both
are enabled for it.  You need S111 to SPOOF at all, and either
V.32bis/MNP or PEP for it to work.
-- 
Keith Smith          uunet!ksmith!keith            5719 Archer Rd.
Digital Designs      BBS 1-919-423-4216            Hope Mills, NC 28348-2201
Somewhere in the Styx of North Carolina ...
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mmoore@staff.tc.umn.edu ("None of ya Bizness")
Subject: Digicom Scout Plus and Downloading Problems
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 00:13:14 GMT

I just gripped a Digicom Scout Plus 14.4k modem this past week, and I
am having trouble doing downloads with it.  Here's the deal:

I use Qmodem, the software that it's bundled with.  When I try and
download using YMODEM-G/batch, it will start downloading for about 10
seconds, then the status message bar in Qmodem will say:

CRC ERROR IN BLOCK #num (num being something like 8 or 10 or 11)

then it will say

LOST INTERRUPT ERROR

upon which, if i press any key, I get a nice download to my screen, so
I have to hang up my modem and dial in again.

If I use ZMODEM, everything seems to work okay, however, I'm only
getting about 580 CPS transmit rate.  Once, I did get about a 730-750
transmit rate, after I had kicked up the number of download buffers to
64.  This is at 9600 baud on a 9600 baud line.  WHen I connect, I get
CONNECT 9600 EC/MNP5, if that helps any.

Could someone help me out?  I had definitely hoped to have a little
better thorughput than this.  My system is a 486SX/25, with a serial
mouse in COM1: IRQ 4, the modem in COM2: IRQ 3, no COM3:, and the
other physical serial port (25-pin) at COM4:.

Thanks...email or post..I'll be followin!


-- 
Malcolm Diallo Moore, CIS-Univ. of Minn.                mmoore@staff.tc.umn.edu
				            	    moor0009@student.tc.umn.edu
"Aww, nigga! You know you all that and a          malcolm@mermaid.micro.umn.edu
	bowl o' grits!!"  - Ice Cube
From: wolfgang@netcom.com (Wolfgang Henke)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Digicom Scout+ $199
Date: 18 Nov 92 20:14:20 GMT
Organization: Netcom
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

Graham Toal (gtoal@cursci.demon.co.uk) wrote:
: 
: In article <1992Nov17.190054.10183@netcom.com> wolfgang@netcom.com writes:
: >prices of its Scout Plus modem series. I can now offer:
: >Digicom Scout+ PC V.32bis (internal)      $199
: 
: Grrr - *now* he tells me - just as well I didn't buy a dozen as planned. :)

Well, you have an additional incentive to proceed now. :-)

: >Also, a mayor online service has committed to tens of thousands of
: >Scouts. I suspect this leads to production efficiencies.
: 
: Don't be coy - it's Compu$erve, isn't it?  They're also offering them
: at $199, though I don't know if this is only to members or comes with
: a free trial membership or what.

Its Prodigy, a joint venture of IBM and Sears. They will upgrade the service
above 2400 bps and offer their members modems produced by Digicom at
attractive membership prices. Currently they have 870,000 subscribers.
There are other changes to their service planned, like an Internet connection. 
A membership costs $14.95. (Flat monthly rate). 

The Wall Street Journal carried the announcement last Thursday. If there
is interest I copy it in here.

: Wolfgang is OK folks.  He understands what 'service' means.

Thank you!

: G



-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
   Wolfgang Henke     Data Lanes not car pool lanes.     wolfgang@netcom.com 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser)
Subject: Re: Why is Supra able to sell?
Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix  (508) 655-3848
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:52:50 GMT

larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>>The association between PEP and UNIX is changing.
>>I see more and more UUCP links on one reasonably well connected
>>machine, sgi.com, that prefer v.32 or v.32bis.
>You have a point.  Anyone who is serious about UUCP has a 
>v.32/v.32bis modem these days, where as a couple of years
>ago, PEP was the only option.  


What's the net opinion about the WORLDblazer?  Is it worth the extra money
(to get the SuperPEP) over something like the T3000?

-- 
bill@unixland.natick.ma.us                      ESIX Mailing List Moderator
Public Access UNIX/USENET/E-MAIL!  UUCP Accounts Available!  (508) 655-3848
                            V.32/PEP/V.42bis, etc.   Located in Natick, MA USA