HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ma90alb@brunel.ac.uk (Ashley L Brandwood)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Fax Questions
Date: 27 Jan 93 10:36:51 GMT
Organization: Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]

Tan Jin Meng (eletanjm@nuscc.nus.sg) wrote:
: We have an application that has the following characteristics

: -  Will have 2 PCs at remote locations connected via phone line.
: -  Will need to download images as well as data.

: There is a suggestion that we use fax/modems. The reason being that
: we can make use of any compression that the fax hardware does and also
: that the central (server) site will be able to receive images from other
: sites with only paper fax machines. The questions that arise are :

: -  Do fax cards incorporate data compression? What kind? How effective?

Yes they do (but dont know what or how effective)

: -  Is there available fax software (esp Windows based) that will allow
:    a program to operate the fax card via API or a software library? I
:    may also have to be able to obtain the image data for some image 
:    processing.

Yes , or at least I have been told there is, however if you can find some, can 
you send me details.

: -  Given the second point above, preferbly should incorporate scanner
:    support also in the API.

Pass

: -  I assume that I can easily use the fax card alternately as a fax
:    machine as well as a data modem. Can I confirm this?

Yes, any fax/modem software will allow you to use the modem for both data and
faxes.

: -  If I use the fax card as a data modem, can I also make use of
:    hardware compression facility? How? 

No you cannot use the fax hardware compression because faxes use a different 
standard.  However if you get a fax/modem capable of supporting v42bis or MNP 5 and above you can get compression of upto 4 times (not this figure is for *PURE*text.

: -  Can I manipulate the resolution of the fax? ie can I have 150dpi,
:    300dpi, 100dpi etc fax?

Most fax software has the ability to use both standard and fine `fax` 
resolutions, although only a few will support very fine resolutions.

: I certainly hope someone can answer these questions as well as provide
: recommendations for products. Any advice is appreciated - as you may
: guess, I know nothing about fax technology and certainly nothing about
: PC Fax applications.

Now the important data: the fax card ought to be able of upto 9600 baud send
(and 4800 baud for recieve) - to cut down phone bills.  The data modem should be
a minimum of 2400 baud although 9600 or 14.4Kb are preferable (again for speed)
also the fax should be of group 3 type (this means that you can send grey-scale
pictures via the fax. (however this is only any good if your fax software is
capable of recieving group3 faxes (mine isnt!)

: Thank you very much.

: jin meng

Hope this helps, (if you want more, drop me a line, and I will try to help.)

-Ashley
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: ipadavic@garnet.acns.fsu.edu (Irene Padavic)
Subject: Re: WD Caviar 2200 slow?
Organization: Florida State University
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 02:59:28 GMT

liuyu@acf5.NYU.EDU (liuyu) writes:
> ajb8886@ritvax.isc.rit.edu writes:
> 
>  >Yes.  Try a recent version of CORE test.  It's pretty consistent ALTHOUGH it
>  >sometimes gets confused by caching and reports very high performance (but
>  >misleading) figures with some caches enabled.
> 
> I just tried CORE test (v 2.92) I found on wuarchive. It showed 1.89 meg/s. 
> Amazingly different... Maybe this version is too old. It is dated 1990.
> 
> Anyway, thanks for the detailed reply!

Using CORE 2.92 on my 2250 I got 1.64 megs.  Gateway had estimated 1.5
when they sold it to me.  And, it sure doesn't seem noisy compared to the
Microscience it replaced.

Randy Earnest c/o ipadavic@garnet.acns.fsu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: turkstra@smaug.cs.hope.edu (Screwtape)
Subject: Experiences with MAXTOR EXT 4380 please?
Organization: Hope College Dept of CS
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 17:46:28 GMT

Hey.  I'm looking at buying a used Maxtor ESDI drive.
The model # is EXT 4380.  Supposedly 380M unformatted, 318 
formatted.  If anyone's got horror stories or "good stories"
please let me know, I need input on this.  Thanks in 
advance.
-- 

Chris Turkstra
Turkstra@cs.hope.edu
Traveling the Internet with a load not properly tied down.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: oprktmx@gsusgi2.gsu.edu (Kevin Mitchell)
Subject: DELL 486dx2-66 to a MAC monitor M5812ll/A
Organization: Georgia State University
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 13:53:53 GMT


Is there anyway to hook up the MAC monitor to a SVGA card.  The card can
support one resolution above 1024X768.  I just can't remember the exact
resulotion.  The resulotion on the MAC monitor 1152X870.  One of the
managers in the computer center here has a Quadra 900 and the dell on his
desk and he would like to use the 21" screen of the MAC.  So please do not
flame me because of the MAC reference.

Kevin Mitchell
Micro-Repair
oprktmx@gsusgi2.gsu.edu
From: ajb8886@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Subject: Re: WD Caviar 2200 slow?
Reply-To: ajb8886@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 15:20:49 GMT

In article <2129@acf5.NYU.EDU>, liuyu@acf5.NYU.EDU (liuyu) writes:
>Hi,
>  I just bought a Wd Caviar 2200 hard drive. The Norton SI only shows about
>600k/sec DTR. But it showed over 1000k/sec DTR when I first
>installed it. Later it just dropped down to 600k.

Welcome to the confusing wonder of ZBR (Zone Bit Recording).  With modern IDE
drives, the number of sectors on a given track varies with its circumference.

The outermost cylinders have the highest sector density (and the highest
transfer rate since disk RPM is a constant (3600RPM for this drive, I believe).

Thus, if the test is being run on the outermost cylinders, you'll get the
highest transfer rate.  

Also note that the "CMOS" drive configuration (what the computer THINKS the
drive is configured as) and what the drive is ACTUALLY configured as (due to
"translation"), the test may be actually spanning multiple cylinders depending
on the data on the drive is organized.  In such a case you would have more
overhead due to the head repositioning (which the diagnostics program "thinks"
is not occurring due to sector translation).

Moral of the story:  Do not rely on disk benchmarks too heavily, as the way
they are measured can sometimes give widely varying results (particularly with
the use of on-drive hardware caches).

Alex

>The Checkit gives me 890k/s consistantly. I tried a different IDE card. And
>the same thing happened again. At first SI showed over 1000k DTR. But after
>running checkit which gave me 890k, SI dropped down to 600k. Even after
>rebooting, SI still gave me 600k.
>I was wondering if Norton SI or Checkit had bugs. Maybe one them change my
>CMOS setting (ie bus speed). But I doubt it because I checked my CMOS and
>there was no change.
>Is there any other small Benchmark programs that I can use?
>

Yes.  Try a recent version of CORE test.  It's pretty consistent ALTHOUGH it
sometimes gets confused by caching and reports very high performance (but
misleading) figures with some caches enabled.

>BTW, my machine is AMD386/40, 4meg, 64k cache, UMC chipset.
From: timhu@ico.isc.com (Timothy Hu)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: 1/4" tape drives?
Date: 27 Jan 93 00:01:33 GMT
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Boulder CO

In article <1993Jan26.222745.4552@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> wood@havedash.aer.loral.com (Bill Wood) writes:
>   Does anyone know if it is possible to connect a 1/4" tape drive
>(150Mb QIC-150 DC-6150 tapes) to an ISA 486 system?  These are the
>larger tapes, not the small DC-2xxx tapes.  Specifically, 
>I would like to be able to read tar tapes from a Sun SPARCstation
>on a PC.
>
>   Any help in locating vendors which sell the tapes, controllers and/or
>software necessary would be most appreciated.
>
>   Please respond by e-mail so I don't miss your response in this high-volume
>newsgroup.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bill Wood
>wood@havedash.aer.loral.com
>

If you're getting a SCSI tape drive, you might want to get an Adaptec
1542B host adapter. Then you'll want GNUtar for DOS which is available
from an ftp site:

ftp.uu.net:systems/msdos/simtel20/dskutl/aspibin.zip

I am consistently able to read tapes that I've written from a SPARC.
However, I'm having a bit of trouble getting files with names longer
than the 8+3 DOS format.

Tim
-- 
Timothy Hu timhu@ico.isc.com	 | The intelligence (or lack of) expressed
Interactive Systems Corporation  | above does not necessarily reflect
Resource Solutions International | that of anyone else.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: wolff@liberator.et.tudelft.nl (Rogier Wolff)
Subject: Re: 1M SIMM and 4M SIMM
Organization: Delft University of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 17:43:56 GMT

>In article <chans.727489458@marsh> chans@cs.curtin.edu.au (Sean Chan) writes:

>>possible combination is to trade 4x1 Mb SIMMs for a 4x4Mb SIMMs, and
>>leaving the remaining 4x1 Mb SIMMs, giving a total of 20 Mb. However,
>>isn't there some kind of problem with having more than 16 Mb of RAM??
>>Something to do with the DMA controller??

Nope. Not with the DMA controller. However you are right: There is something
to watch out for. Devices on the ISA bus only have access to the lower
24 address lines, for a total of 16Mb of memory. They can't access
(DMA) memory above 16Mb. Thus software using DMA on these devices should
be aware that they can't send things to above the 16Mb boundary.

						Roger.
-- 
****   a 486 in V86 mode is like a VW buggy with a 6 litre V12 motor.  ****
EMail:  wolff@duteca.et.tudelft.nl   ** Tel  +31-15-783643 or +31-15-142371
From: DonH@cup.portal.com (Don - Hirschfeld)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: 24 bit accelerator cards
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 05:04:18 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

I would go for the Diamond Speedstar 24X which is faster and cheaper
than the 1280 . You can get it for about $160. You have to consider also
the speed of DOS operations. The 1280 was 50% slower than my cheapie
SVGA with DOS. The 24X was 2x the speed of 1280.
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:37512 comp.multimedia:4281 comp.periphs.scsi:6774
From: pieterh@sci.kun.nl (Peter Herweijer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: What good are Bios RAM tests ?
Date: 21 Jan 93 14:46:55 GMT
Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

In <1993Jan21.112136.2125@dmu.ac.uk> cph@dmu.ac.uk (Chris Hand) writes:

>In article <1jagkpINNarn@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes:
>
>No I don't thankyou.  But I made a mistake in the original posting!
>
>It really was: 
>	SIMM Salesman: If your m/mboard can use 4Meg SIMMs it can use
>	               3-chip SIMMs
>	m/board guy:   Your m/board can't use 3-chip SIMMs
>	m/board docs:  This m/board can use 4 Meg SIMMs (no mention of
>	               3-chip or 9-chip).
>
>So there's an inconsistency here.

I see now.

>People have been talking about the BIOS making a difference to the refresh,
>but I would have thought it's the CHIPSET we should be looking at?  After
>all that's what controls the refresh, caching etc.

Of course it is... but guess who controls the chipset?  I suggest
you take a look at the 'chipset setup' section of your BIOS setup menu.
If this section contains an entry like:

        Hidden Refresh    Enabled
or      Refresh           Hidden

or something like that, you should have flipped that for 3-chip or 4Mb SIMMs.

Despite the fact that you've already solved the matter in the easiest
way, it would be nice if it were sorted out.  I mean, how can you BEAR
to run Linux in 8Mb ? ;-}

Peter Herweijer
pieterh@sci.kun.nl
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: tdbear@dvorak.amd.com (Thomas D. Barrett)
Subject: Re: DX2 vs. Overdrive
Keywords: overdrive
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Austin, Texas
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 15:23:37 GMT

In article <1993Jan20.105355.6287@odin.diku.dk> bjarni@diku.dk (Henrik V. Drab|l) writes:
> Do you have to cool the Overdrive chip?  (like the DX2), or is it
>self-cooling (there are cooling ribs on it!)

The heat-sink "ribs" are there to make it operate just as cool as the
486sx.  A cooling fan isn't such a bad idea if you purchased your
system components seperately and assemble the system yourself (since
you probably don't have the facility to perform a thermal test).  The
237-pin OverDrive(tm) probably has a similar heatsink, but since it is
a larger chip I suppose it might need more cooling.

-- 
|Tom Barrett (TDBear), Sr. Engineer|tom.barrett@amd.com|v:512-462-6856 |
|AMD PCD MS-520 | 5900 E. Ben White|Austin, TX  78741  |f:512-462-5155 |
|"No is yes, And we're all free" ---Tracy Chapman, "Why?"              |
|My views are my own and may not be the same as the company of origin  |
From: amigaman+@pitt.edu (Russell A Howard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Info. on ZEOS
Date: 28 Jan 93 17:42:49 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh


	Anyone care to share their experience with the Zeos Intl. company.  I'm
thinking about purchasing a system from them and was wondering about their
reputation/quality of their systems.
-- 
Russ Howard
Internet:  amigaman+@pitt.edu
BIX:       russhoward
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: eln150f@mdw030.cc.monash.edu.au (TW Chua)
Subject: Re: HELP WITH A COLORADO
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 10:42:17 GMT

allen.edwards@spacebbs.com (Allen Edwards) writes:

>-> >My problem is that I cannot even format a tape. Format, which takes
>-> >two hours!, only gets 50% done and does seeks on the tape forever
>-> after >that and past the time estimated.
>->
>-> That's normal !

>What do you mean by "That's mormal !"  I amhaving the same problem
>listed and cannot get it going.  I have turned off the dual DMA mode and
>still it will not work.  I was looking over all the messages and saw
>yours and wondered what you were trying to say?  Thanks for the reply.
>Allen
>                 
>----
>SPACE BBS - Menlo Park, CA - 10 Lines - BoardWatch Top Ten BBS
>415-323-4193 (v.32bis) - 4gB (50,000 files) + Wx, UPI News, etc.

	I am having the same problem. I found out that during the first 50%
it is doinf formatting and the second 50% it is actually doing verifying.
My drive used to work perfectly and only recently this problem appeared.
Does anybody know what is wrong with the drive? I tried different settings
of the tape software and even cleaning the head and edge connectors.
	Any help will be much appreciated. If I can't solve this problem,
my confidence towards CMS product will be greately affected.

YP
From: pss1@kepler.unh.edu (Paul S Secinaro)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro EISA.  When?
Date: 19 Jan 1993 19:44:51 GMT
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
NNTP-Posting-Host: kepler.unh.edu

In article <B6VmXB3w164w@cellar.org> failsafe@cellar.org (Failsafe) writes:

>ATI technical support told me a few days ago it would be released on January
>18th. Computer Discount Warehouse confirmed this and said it has around 150
>on order, for which 99 were spoken for. I made it 100!

Any word on price? 


-- 
Paul Secinaro
pss1@kepler.unh.edu
Synthetic Vision and Pattern Analysis Laboratory
UNH Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
From: a_millsbs@ccsvax.sfasu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Where to find "Lunchbox" portables
Date: 22 Jan 93 10:15:36 CST
Organization: Stephen F. Austin State University

I am looking for a source for good, reasonabley priced, "lunchbox" style
portable computers.  In fact a source for the lunchbox style cases that will
accept a standard baby-at motherboard would be nice.

Any pointers Greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Scott Mills                            (409) 568-1363
Computer Center -- Technical Support,     Stephen F. Austin State University
a_millsbs@ccsvax.sfasu.edu                P.O. Box 13012 SFA Station
root@calvin.sfasu.edu                     Nacogdoches, TX  75962
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: davel@comtch.spk.wa.us (Dave Laird)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: HELP WITH A COLORADO
Date: 26 Jan 93 21:44:41 GMT
Organization: Waffle BBS at CompuTech Spokane, Washington

I own several Jumbo 120's, and have averaged about 45 to 55 minutes to 
format on each drive since the beginning, regardless of what processor it 
is currently operating under. 
I would suggest that if you have a large number of errors or bad format 
tracks, replace the tape. If it takes too long for a format to take 
place, ( > 1 hr) then you should contact CMS Tech Support, if you can get 
through. The latest version of their software is pretty buggy, so you 
might want to consider an older version, as well. 

--
davel@comtch.spk.wa.us (Dave Laird)
IEAx for lack of a better name... (509) 624-0744
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.ibm.misc
From: weiping@eng2.eng.monash.edu.au (Weiping Hu Materials)
Subject: Monitor alignment - help!
Summary: Text screen and graphics screen not aligned!
Keywords: text screen, graphics screen
Organization: Faculty of Engineering, Monash University 
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 22:17:02 GMT

Hi!  I bought a PC recently and now found that the text screen (25x80) and 
the graphics screen (800x600) are not aligned with each other.  The 
phenomena is like this: if I align the text in the middle by adjusting the H-
Posi switch and then enter the graphics mode, then the graphics display 
will be about 1 cm right, leaving a black strip on the left side of the 
screen; if I align the graphics screen, and exit to text mode, then part of 
the text will be off screen to the left.

My guess is that if you can align the greyish background (you get it by 
turning the contrast switch) in the text mode, the problem could be solved.  
But can I do it and how?  

Any information and help would be highly appreciated.

Weiping

-------
PS: Hardware data: 486-33DX, 4MB Ram, 1MB VGA card (trident), Ultra Super 
    monitor, non-interlaced.  Vertical scan rate: 72Hz.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: tdbear@dvorak.amd.com (Thomas D. Barrett)
Subject: Re: local bus hard disk
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Austin, Texas
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 23:06:44 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.192638.1458@julian.uwo.ca> wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith) writes:
>
>Are current IDE drives able to handle local bus speeds?
>
Nope... and you obviously found that out.  The drives are limited by
the interface chip and until recently they only needed to handle the
8MHz bus timing.  Those interface chips have to time slice the 8-bit
data buffer SRAM (on the drive) or the n-bit cache RAM (on the drive)
between the serializer logic for the drive data and the 8-bit (XT) or
16-bit (AT and Local-bus) IO port.  

Some drives can handle very fast transfers, but the majority are
relatively slow.  There is a move on, initiated by Tandon and other
companies, to have the ATA standard changed to include the buffer
access speed.  It is already in there for some timing, but not for
processor IO time on the local bus.  Until then, the BIOS folks have
to hardcode drive tables to program the local-bus IDE interfaces for
optimum performance.

The fastest drives that I've seen are from Seagate (Yes, Seagate... I
wouldn't have believed it myself and it took a damned long time before
I was convenience that they were any good... But, they are!), Conner, and
WD.  I think that the Seagate ones were further along, but the WD and
Conner seemed to have fairly good access times, too.

These drives, without any cache, on the local bus are as fast or
faster than cached drives.  Furthermore, the potential for the local
bus interface is such that for a single head/platter the bottleneck is
just getting the data off of the platter.

-- 
|Tom Barrett (TDBear), Sr. Engineer|tom.barrett@amd.com|v:512-462-6856 |
|AMD PCD MS-520 | 5900 E. Ben White|Austin, TX  78741  |f:512-462-5155 |
|"No is yes, And we're all free" ---Tracy Chapman, "Why?"              |
|My views are my own and may not be the same as the company of origin  |
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: lundby@pabst (Walter Lundby)
Subject: Colorado Jumbo 250 software interface?
Organization: Land Mobile Products Sector, Motorola INC.
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1993 18:04:25 GMT


I have a Colorado 250 tape drive which uses DC-2120 tapes.
Does anybody know of a programming interface specification
to this machine?

I am asking as I am considering two alternate uses for this
device.  One is as a backing store for a virtual hard disk.
This requires a different interface than that supplied with
the drive.   The other use would be to back up a pc running 
one of the unix variants (386BSD or linux).  If drivers are
too hard to obtain for those OS's I won't even consider installing
with them.

Any information would be appreciated.   My mail address is 
messed up so please reply via follow-up postings.

Walter Lundby
lundby@adobe.rtsg.mot.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: sap@sactoh0.sac.ca.us (Stephan A. Puga)
Subject: Maximum size HD's
Organization: Sacramento Public Access Unix
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 20:00:26 GMT

Was is the largest possible hard drive size on an IBM
compatible(386 or 486) running DOS 5.0?  Is is limited by DOS and
controller type or what?  Any comments are appreciated!

-- 
#############################################################
# "Its been surreal!"         #     sap@sactoh0.SAC.CA.US   #  
#     -- Gogo Dodo            # UUCP=..ames!pacbell!sactoh0 #
#############################################################
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: pastor@prc.unisys.com (Jon Pastor)
Subject: GW2000 software upgrades
Organization: not much...
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:02:40 GMT

I am talking to GW2000's add-ons people (really -- I'm on hold at the moment,
and listening to Roy Orbison...) about software upgrades.  They are apparently
ready to ship WinFax Pro 3.0 and a new version of Crosstalk, for those of you
who ordered the TelePath FAX/modem.  Since my system is so new, the upgrades
are *free*!

In general, we are responsible for keeping tabs on upgrades for S/W we got
through GW2000, so keep your noses in the Computer Mags and maybe even post
when you notice an upgrade announcement...  I know that this is questionable,
since this is comp.sys.ibm.pc.HARDWARE, but it is software that our HARDWARE
vendor is supplying -- maybe.  Yes, maybe.  I just got off the phone, and the
rep I was talking to said that she'd just been told that GW2000 carries
upgrades AT THEIR DISCRETION -- i.e., they're under no obligation to do so --
and gives free upgrades on the same basis.  I'll have to wait 5-6 WEEKS for
the free WinFax and Crosstalk upgrades (unless I successfully sweet-talked
the add-on rep), but they will be free.  

For S/W that GW2000 chooses not to supply, you contact the vendor, and tell
them that your S/W is licensed to GW2000, and they should treat you like a
registered user (i.e., not charge you through the nose).

I think that I saw someone mention CMS tape S/W verion 3.03?  The one I got
was 2.0.  Also, I believe that I saw mention of DOS 6.0 due in 1Q93?
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: mtichy@fraser.sfu.ca (Martin Tichy)
Subject: Re: Gateway 66V LB 8M SIMMs
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 03:06:44 GMT

SR> I have not sent the 2 8MB SIMMS back (have 14 days to do
SR> it). I was wondering if anyone has tried using these
SR> successfully on a MICRONICS 486 66VLB motherboard.
 
My manual for my Micronics 486-33 VL-Bus says it only supports
4Mx36 -70ns and 1Mx36 -70ns simms.