HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ryanm@stein.u.washington.edu (Ryan Mcneilly)
Subject: Re: Soul of the Republican Party ( Was Re: Conservative Values (Re: New
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 19:41:25 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.184832.3221@u.washington.edu> scythe@hardy.u.washington.edu (The Grim Reaper) writes:
>In article <1992Dec17.165709.22823@news.columbia.edu> egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:
>>In article <1gq80kINNb9@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu> pearsodc@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU writes:
>>>Russ Anderson writes in response to my post:
>[SNIP!]
>
>>
>>Perhaps we should.  We can watch the battle for the soul of the GOP in
>>a net microcosm.  (This perhaps would be more philosophical a fight
>>than what is actually going on.  The organizational sophistication of
>>the various Fundamentalist groups obviously won't matter in this
>>forum.)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>The insane fear of socialism throws the bourgeois headlong into the
>>arms of despotism.
>>			-- Tocqueville, 1852
>Hmm.  IMO, the only way the Republicans are going to win in '96 is
>if they manage to suppress all the ultra-right wing hyperreligious nuts.
>The Democratic strategy in '92 was move the party towards the average joe's
>politics.
>The Republican strategy in '92 was to move the part *AWAY* from the
>average joe's politics, and towards the religious crazies (see
>what happened to the Republicans here in Washington ... a platform against
>yoga and medition =) )
>
>Now guess who won?
>
>
>


Okay, I guess I'm crazy. 8-)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
  Ryan McNeilly                    Internet: ryanm@u.washington.edu
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"You can't deal from a position of weakness"  --Alfred Thayer Mahan
Moral:  Protect the 2nd Amendment!

My comments and opinions are my own and nobody elses!!!!!

From: omb@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Owen Barrus)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 20:37:48 GMT
Subject: Re: The "L" word
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, crowder@epcot.spdc.ti.com (Mark Crowder) writes:

> 
> In reading this group, I can see that there are many different opinions
> on what the word "Liberal" means.  However, I never see it actually
> defined.  How about a dialogue on it?  I'll start.  This is one of
> my recent favorites:
> 
>   "When is say 'liberals'[ed. orig in italics], I certainly don't
>    mean openhanded individuals or tolerant persons or even Big 
>    Government Democrats.  I mean people who are excited that one
>    percent of the profits of Ben and Jerry's ice cream goes to 
>    promote world peace."
> 			-- P.J. O'Rourke  "Give War a Chance" 
> 
> Any other ideas?  No fair using the dictionary!
> 
> Mark Crowder  "I'm sorry my karma ran over your dogma"  crowder@spdc.ti.com 
> Dallas, Tx                                          Texas Instruments, Inc.
> "If at first you don't succeed, try again.  Then quit.  No use being a 
>  damn fool about it."  -- W.C. Fields

Based on what I read in notes from those who espouse "liberalism" I could
define a liberal as follows:

Liberal: A politically correct person that has puke for brains.

"Blessed is the person who, having nothing to say gives us wordy evidence of
 the fact"

Owen Barrus "Boycott Colorado and keep all the weirdos out of here"
Loveland, Co
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: bparrish@rose.hp.com (Bill Parrish)
Subject: Re: Disclaimers on TV show
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:10:23 GMT
Organization: HP - Systems Technology Division
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.8 PL6]

David Neal Messina (dnm9@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu) wrote:
: 
: Living in New York, I have seen Rush's TV show tapings three or four
: times, and I can tell you that the disclaimer is put on by the
: production crew at the original taping.  From my corner, it seems odd
: that any affiliates would edit this out.  I can't imagine any station
: wanting to give up a statement designed to protect it...thoughts, O
: posters to Rushnet?
: 
: 
: David
: dnm9@columbia.edu

Yes... there is a "tongue-in-cheek" disclaimer taped as part of the show...
but KCRA  puts on an additional one before and after the program.  It is done
in purple and white graphics, with the text being read by a female 
voice.  It also mentions the call-letters.  I doubt very much that
this gets put on at the feed point.

Bill



From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 01:00:47 GMT
Subject: Apology to McNeilly and Thomas
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
From: farthing@leland.Stanford.EDU (ljf)
Subject: Re: Homos and the Draft (Re: Homophobes in the Military)
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 00:17:50 GMT

In article <Bz7HrD.GoD@news.cso.uiuc.edu> wiggins@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (Don Wiggins) writes:
>This is the first I'd heard anything about individuals being held in
>service until the fighting was over.  My initial reaction is that
>involuntary separation, though done relatively quickly, may often take
>several weeks, especially for those who are temporarilly assigned to
>overseas combat areas.  Since the Iraq "war" was very short, it seems
>quite reasonable that anyone being involuntarily discharged for any
>reason might not be out the door before the fighting ended.

It didn't get a lot of attention in the mainstream media.  I wonder
why...

It seems quite reasonable that the military doesn't care about sexual
orientation when it needs the skills of lesbigay people to help fight
a war and then tosses them out when the war is over.

Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 20:09:31 -0500 
From: Thomas Omar Smith <ts2a+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Military Efectiveness and Gays
Distribution: world,local

Excerpts from netnews.alt.fan.rush-limbaugh: 14-Dec-92 Military
Efectiveness and Gays D R Friedman@misvms.bpa. (507)

> A point of fact and history:  Alexander the Great was gay and it seems the
> army he ran had no problems in being effective. 

> Dfriedman@bpa.arizona.edu
> -------------------------------------
> "Courses, programs, and requirements described in this catalog may be 
> suspended, deleted, restricted, supplemented, or changed in any other 
> manner at any time at the sole discretion of the University..  The catalog 
> does not establish a contractual relationship.
> 		--From the University of Arizona 1992-1993 Catalog


Well yeah, but his raucous partying caused his death and helped plunge
the civilized world into many years of meaningless warfare.

One example does not make a case, and your example is less than ideal.

					Tom the non hacker
					Kemp in 96!
					"If patriotism is the last refuge
					of scoundrels,  Then environmentalism
					is the current refuge of totalitarians."
					Bob Jackson
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: The Ultimate Hypocrisy
Organization: Gizmonic Institute - Home of the "Super G Burger"
Distribution: world 
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 01:01:26 GMT

<1992Dec8.004652.14566@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) :
><wf6decG00awU9_GF1b@andrew.cmu.edu> gp2f+@andrew.cmu.edu (Gary James Patalsky):
>>I think that the official motto of environmental liberals should be:
>>" You can kill all the babies you want, but DON'T  TOUCH the spotted owl."
>
>Dittos.

Now Steve, you know that killing babies is against the law in this
country.


Gordon
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: kebarnes@memstvx1.memst.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Disclaimers on TV show
Date: 15 Dec 92 11:45:13 -0600
Organization: Memphis State University

In article <1992Dec15.052548.24567@news.columbia.edu>, dnm9@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (David Neal Messina) writes:
> 
>>bparrish@rose.hp.com (Bill Parrish) writes:
>>
>>>I'm curious... in Sacramento the Rush Limbaugh TV program is preceeded by
>>>a disclaimer... something to the effect that "The Views expressed on the
>>>Rush Limbaugh program do not necessarily reflect those of the staff and
>>>management of KCRA Channel 3, or its sponsors... etc".  I'm curious if this
>>>is done in other parts of the country.  
> 
> Living in New York, I have seen Rush's TV show tapings three or four
> times, and I can tell you that the disclaimer is put on by the
> production crew at the original taping.  From my corner, it seems odd
> that any affiliates would edit this out.  I can't imagine any station
> wanting to give up a statement designed to protect it...thoughts, O
> posters to Rushnet?
> 
> 
> David
> dnm9@columbia.edu

EIB does put a disclaimer on, usually followed by a "BUT THEY OUGHT TO BE"
or "DON'T ASK US WHY", but the above post was evidently referring to a
dislaimer added by a local affiliate.

It must be a California thing. WREG-TV here in Memphis doesn't do it.
(For a few weeks there they'd move the air time around at random
to make sure no one missed their "Cheers" or "M*A*S*H" reruns after
the baseball game, but they DON'T do that...)

BTW, in the credits to the TV show, limbaugh.org is listed as E.I.C.
not E.I.B.
Anyone know why?

-- 
*.x,*dna**************************************************************
*(==) Ken Barnes, LifeSci Bldg.                                      *
* \'  KEBARNES@memstvx1.memst.edu                                    *
*(-)**Memphis,TN********75320,711@compuserve.com**********************
"If nobody said anything unless he knew what he was talking about,
a ghastly hush would descend upon the earth."--Sir Alan Herbert
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:10061 talk.abortion:51930
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: rights and responsibilities
Date: 14 Dec 92 16:51:29 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1992Dec13.041432.17770@netcom.com> ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
>From: ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer)
>Subject: Re: rights and responsibilities
>Date: 13 Dec 92 04:14:32 GMT

>exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor) writes ...
>>I think you might be missing the point here.  I would rather pay *more* to 
>>raise a child than *less* to kill one.  IMHO, my money, I want to say what 
>>it gets spent on.

>You'll have to pardon my extreme skepticism, since I've seen no
>evidence of any pro-lifer spending significant money on avoiding
>abortions.  The current tactic seems to be to force other people to
>spend _their_ money.

>Here's a solution to the abortion problem.  One which will let you and
>people who agree with you end 95% of abortions almost overnight.

>Pay women to give birth.

>That's it.  Yes, it will cost, and some women will probably demand
>quite a bit of money, but I'm sure that by time you get to $250,000
>each, almost all women will be willing to go through with pregnancy.

>And after all, the life of a fetus/embryo is priceless, and worth any
>expense.

>Right?

Next, we should pay rapists not to rape, and murderers not to murder,
of course.

In fact, I'd like a job as a paid non-murderer.  Where do I sign up?  ;-)

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    !!! H A P P Y   H O L I D A Y S !!!
 ObQuotes:
 "Igornance and prejudice, confident their ways are best..."
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."

  - Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:10490 alt.politics.clinton:18912 alt.politics.bush:14771 alt.politics.homosexuality:8216 alt.rush-limbaugh:11964
From: keb3_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Karin E. Baker)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Homos and the Draft (Re: Homophobes in the Military)
Date: 19 Dec 92 15:54:04 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Dec14.185610.26013@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:

>In article <12DEC199213472570@zeus.tamu.edu> rlc1028@zeus.tamu.edu writes:
>>In article <Bz5r1K.9wK@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, wiggins@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (Don Wiggins) writes...
>>| 
>>|  Except for an occasional screw-up (play on words unintended), the
>>|military has not knowingly drafted, enlisted, or commissioned anyone whom
>>|they knew to be homosexual.  Those who are later found to be such are quickly
>>|separated.  Admittedly, my experience only goes back three decades so I
>>|can't address what the policy was prior to that.  The "need every bit of
>>|help they can get" argument sounds more like a Billary initiative.
>>
>>	Indeed?  I was told that now-a-days, you cannot claim to be Gay
>>in order to get out of the military when there is compulsory service 
>>(draft).  I hate to have given out incorrect information.  Do you know
>>if what you are saying is true for these days?
>>
>>Gadson Sandor

>I was in the US Air Force from 7 June 77 thru 1 Feb 1982, and if, at any 
>point during that time, I wanted to get a "General" discharge, all I had 
>to do was go to my commander and convince him that I was gay.  Guaranteed.

>Does anyone out there have newer information?

Try substituing the word 'dishonorable' in place of 'general' discharge, and 
then you'll be more accurate!

>Ted

>-- 
>So the Maples formed a union, and demanded equal rights, "The Oaks are just 
>too greedy.  We will make them give us light!"  Now there's no more Oak 
>oppression, for they passed a noble law.  And the trees are all kept equal, 
>by hatchet, axe and saw.     -  Rush, The Trees
-- 
;^) -Karin
keb3_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 16:27:27 EST
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: All generalizations are wrong, was Re: A poem about Rush Limpball
 <10DEC199209570257@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu> <92345.163543KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
 <92346.001144MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu>

In article <92346.001144MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu>, Mark 'Mark' Sachs
<MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> says:

>>[Symbolism over substance]
>Or did you mean "some liberals"? Or more likely "a few liberals"? Or, most
>likely of all, "this one guy that Rush Limbaugh mentioned once"?

I mean the several examples Rush finds in the news every day.

>Weekly Reminder: liberals aren't all identically programmed robots
>manufactured in Havana.

Nobody suggested they were.  Just the ones who live in Florida. :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Kurt  E.  Ludwick     | If PRO is the opposite of CON, then
 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -|
 kel111@psuvm.psu.edu  |             what's the opposite of Progress...?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
From: rjk@world.std.com (robert j kolker)
Subject: Re: Hmmm, where do Randians fit in with us here?
Keywords: ego,egg,Eggo
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 15:23:16 GMT

The Federal Reserver chairguy, Alan Greenspan, was at one time a close
follower of Ayn Rand. I am sure her ideas have profoundly influenced
Greenspan's thinking then and now.

Conan the Libertarian


-- 
"If you can't love the Constitution, then at least hate the Government"
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: GENERALISATIONS
Date: 14 Dec 92 16:53:59 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.


Just remember, ALL generalisations are wrong.

Especially this one.

 :-)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    !!! H A P P Y   H O L I D A Y S !!!
 ObQuotes:
 "Igornance and prejudice, confident their ways are best..."
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."

  - Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 23:03:08 GMT
Subject: Re: Jury Duty (Was: Thewindbag Against Mo)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, wiggins@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (Don Wiggins) writes:

> 
> This is if you think that avoiding jury duty is the right thing to do.
> It is inconvenient and sometimes unpleasant but it's at least as
> important, in my opinion, as voting for president.  In fact, since one
> vote often determines the outcome of the trial, I submit that it's far
> more important.  Anyone who fails to register to vote just to avoid this
> civic responsibility shouldn't be allowed to vote.

Your point being that anyone who does something to avoid doing something else
should be legally prevented from doing the thing he stopped 
doing voluntarily so that he could avoid doing the second thing.

Also, NOBODY who doesn't register is allowed to vote
regardless of their reason for not registering.

I submit that your paragraph was somewhat absurd. 

But it was amusing.

doug
From: popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: sorry
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 92 19:38:12 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX

Sorry about the previous post that added my comments to a 141 line post.  
But i am using "waffle".  This misearble piece of shit software was 
supposed to remove lines 20 - 141 but failed to do so.  Miserable 
$#@@@!@!@##! editor!  ##@@!!!!!!   I hate waffle.

Pope Charles

--
popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX, (713) 943-2728
After December 31, (713) 481-3763
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: ryanm@stein.u.washington.edu (Ryan Mcneilly)
Subject: Re: Flush Limburger
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 20:24:27 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.161734.18113@news.ysu.edu> ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) writes:
>
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Kurt  E.  Ludwick     | If PRO is the opposite of CON, then
>> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -|
>> kel111@psuvm.psu.edu  |             what's the opposite of Progress...?
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>                           Trick joke...answer: Conservatives like Limbowel.

Congress!

>
>
>                
>-- 
>*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  /\/\   HATE IS NOT A  *         
>*                    Kelley L. Miller  / /  \  FAMILY VALUE   *            
>*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  / /____\                *  
>*     GIGO: Gospel In--Garbage Out   /______\                 *


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
  Ryan McNeilly                    Internet: ryanm@u.washington.edu
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"You can't deal from a position of weakness"  --Alfred Thayer Mahan
Moral:  Protect the 2nd Amendment!

My comments and opinions are my own and nobody elses!!!!!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: ryanm@stein.u.washington.edu (Ryan Mcneilly)
Subject: Re: Cough! Choke! Air, more air!
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 04:15:36 GMT

I just joined this newsgroup today and hate it already.  I though the name
was alt.fan.rush-limbaugh (fan being the key word).  All I see is Lib/Nazi
types and anti semitic, intolerant people.  I love Rush and miss his radio
show from 9 to 12 because the computers in the shop make reception
impossible.  I was looking forward to discussions about Rush comments and
such but it is just a talk.politics.* group.

In article <1gj30dINNkhg@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu> pearsodc@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU writes:
>Christian Gustafson writes:
>>
>>IMHO, I think we should create a new newsgroup, alt.conservative.forum,
>>that could contain the facts, truths, and seemingly divine insights of those 
>>of us who are digging-in for 4 years of an occupation force being inside 
>>the Beltway.  Such a group would be a lesser version of the much lauded 
>>'Town Hall,' but would still run on the inexhaustible fuel of Conservative
>>ideas.
>
>Agreed.  Shoot, the commie/libs get every other group on the alt.* hiearchy,
>(even alt.fan.rush, anymore).  Why shouldn't we get one for ourselves?
>
>Anybody want to volunteer to moderate?
>
>>For now, though, I find this group too noxious, and, despite my mistrust
>>of them, I am tempted to call the EPA.  Air, more air, on the EIB group!
>
>Hear, hear!
>
>>cg
>>-- 
>>:::::======  gus3@midway.uchicago.edu      :::::====== 
>>:::::======  Paleoconservative and proud-  :::::======  
>>===========  fighting to repeal the New    ===========  
>>===========  Deal, for a better tomorrow.  ===========  
>
>clueless chuck				                     ___
>pearsodc@rosevc.rose-hulman.edu                             (o o)
>------------------------------------------------------------w U w------------
>|DOUGLAS C PEARSON JR                |we were headed for somewhere          | 
>|rose-hulman institute of technology |but that was before                   |
>|campus box 1204                     |you traded in your peace sign         |
>|5500 wabash avenue		     |   for a finger...                    |
>|terre haute, indiana  47803         |			- steve taylor, 1992|


I second (I mean third) that motion!!!!!!!  I would love to moderate if I
had the time......  Lets make it!!!!!!!  I think we can gather a few 
people on the right together to make this happen.  --Ryan

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
  Ryan McNeilly                    Internet: ryanm@u.washington.edu
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"You can't deal from a position of weakness"  --Alfred Thayer Mahan
Moral:  Protect the 2nd Amendment!

My comments and opinions are my own and nobody elses!!!!!

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: palane@iastate.edu (Paul A. Lane)
Subject: Re: Why can SNL get away with it....
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 03:35:14 GMT

In <7773@news.duke.edu> eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK) writes:

>Along those lines, liberals can make fun of liberals, and
>liberals can make fun of conservatives because of "free speech." But
>conservatives should never make fun of liberals since they're all just a
>bunch of pious pea-brained old-fashioned bigotted rednecked nazis who
>have no compassion for others. (Conservatives that make fun of
>conservatives are called moderates by liberals.)

And liberals like myself (actually it depends upon the topic) who ridicule
other liberals' positions (such as anti-nuke environmentalists) are called
traitors by some and just as bad by the others.

The only rationale alternative is moderism.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh