HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rl@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (roger.h.levy)
Subject: Fujitsu SCSI terminating resistor
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:02:52 GMT
Keywords: SCSI

I have a Fujitsu SCSI drive that I would like to relocate from a
configuration where the terminating resistor was not needed to
a configuration where it is (i.e. single drive).  The Fujitsu
appears to use a 20 pin DIP terminating resistor network.  I
called Fujitsu for this part but they have at least a 3 week
backorder delay and their minimum purchase and shipping charge
policy leave me unexcited about spending $16 for a resistor.
Does anyone know of an alternative source for this part - I have
found 16 pin terminating resistors to be common but I haven't
found a source for the 20 pin version.  BTW, I assume the
resistor network is the 220/330 ohm type - I'd like to know if
that assumption is wrong because I may just end up building
the part from resitors and a header.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: rmccown@world.std.com (Bob McCown)
Subject: Re: *Two* Parallel Printers from 1 PC - SUMMARY
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 18:11:29 GMT

In article <C0p9Hx.I0H@brunel.ac.uk> Brian.Milner@brunel.ac.uk (Brian D Milner) writes:
>
>	
>	*****   *Two* Parallel Printers from 1 PC SUMMARY    *****
>
>    I got lots of answers, and they mostly agreed on these points:
>
[stuff deleted]
>
>>       Can I use a serial port to run a parallel printer? 
>
Conversely, can I use a serial printer via a paralell port?  Is there some
kind of adapter?

-- 
|  Bob McCown / Mundane - Robur of Roestoc / SCA - Sir Gaath Gazul / NERO  |
|  rmccown@world.std.com                                                   |
|  "'ow d'you know 'e's a king?" "'cause 'e 'asn't got shit all over 'im!  |
|									   |
From: james@george.UUCP (james shoemaker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Help!! *Two* parallel printers from 1 PC????????????????????????
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 93 18:43:47 CST
Organization: Organization for creative time-wasting

Brian.Milner@brunel.ac.uk (Brian D Milner) writes:

> 
> 	I am running a laser printer from my PC's parallel port. Now I'd 
> like to add a parallel dot matrix printer as well. 
> 
> 	Can I *add* a parallel port to my PC? 
                Yes, I have 2 parallel ports in my PC right now.

> 	Can I use a serial port to run a parallel printer? 
> 	Can I get a switch thing to direct my output from one port 
> 	between two printers?
> 	Is there any other way I can get this going?
> 
> 	Only *you* know the answers.
>
From: bs3n+@andrew.cmu.edu (Benjamin Minot Shelton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Bernoulli Drives VS Floptical Drives (?)
Date: 9 Jan 93 18:32:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.gfHuP=q00WA1E2MBlq
Distribution: usa
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

In a preceding article, sassoj@vccnw10.its.rpi.edu (John J. Sasso Jr.) writes:
>   On my i486 PC I have a 104M harddrive (SCSI), which has only 15M left on
>   it.  Although I could buy another 100+M harddrive to get more storage, I
>   was thinking of turning to removable storage (high capacity disks).  I was
>   looking at floptical drives and Bernoulli drives.  From what I understand,
>   (1) Bernoulli drives run about $500, and flopticals about $300, (2) the
>   disks that come w/Bernoulli drives are usually 90M, whereas the disks for
>   flopticals are 21M.  However, how do these two drives compare as far as 
>   access time is concerned (as well as w/ harddrives)?  In the future, plan
>   on having over 200M worth of programs and data files that I'll have to 
>   store.  So, should I get a floptical or Bernoulli drive?  I figure if I 
>   buy either one, all I will have to spend money on is the disks, and not 
>   have to spend hundreds of $$$ on another harddrive.

It is an advantage in my eyes that you do get (kind of) unlimited
storage with these drives.  Keep in mind that both are slower than hard
drives, no matter what the companies claim.  The Bernoulli 90 is claimed
to have an access time of something like 18 ms.  Yeah right!  I clocked
it at the fastest of around 35 ms.  The drive is still pretty quick for
most applications and I would recommend it over the floptical, which is
essentially a gigantic floppy.  The access time is between 150-200 ms
and you notice it.  Then again the flopticals are probably more reliable
(I've never seen any problems with Bernoullis really, though) and
smaller.  Take your pick, since there are advantages to both.  For the
record I would get a Bernoulli drive, since I've used them before and
speed is a BIG concern for me.


=========================================================================
-Ben Shelton (bs3n+@andrew.cmu.edu)
=========================================================================
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:35697 comp.sys.dec.micro:681
From: joelong@cco.caltech.edu (Joseph Louis Long)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.dec.micro
Subject: help: DECwriter monitor cable
Date: 11 Jan 1993 19:46:47 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: mudbalt.caltech.edu
Keywords: dec monitor cable broken

A monitor from a PC type creature which I believe is called
a DECwriter is no longer functioning.  I would like to
replace it with a typical TTL monitor, however the original
monitor connects to the CPU via a DB15 (or maybe 13) as
opposed to the typical DB9 on a PC TTL display... It turns
out that this is because the keyboard lines are also in this
cable and the keyboard plugs into the monitor.  I think it
would be best to simply make a cable that would connect
a normal DB9 monitor and the keyboard to the CPU. 
If anyone knows the pins that are in this display/kbrd
combo connector and would like to save me trouble of having
to buzz it out by __E-MAILING__ me the pinout I would be a most
happy camper, and will gladly send you a digital cookie.  :)

thnx,
joelong@cco.caltech.edu
From: ah157@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Rob Henry)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Any PHOENIX BIOS owners pleass respond
Date: 6 Jan 1993 21:29:50 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: ah157@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Rob Henry)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu






I have a phoenix bios from 1987,3.06 I believe.
It has only 4 monitors listed when I run my setup program,color 40 and color 80
mono and special (ega).

Does this mean i can only use ega or does it just use ega as an
example?
Please leave mail.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: pvonk@scott.skidmore.edu (Pierre VonKaenel)
Subject: Re: When is the 586 due?
Organization: Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs NY, 12866
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 19:44:29 GMT

>>In article <1ikvprINNunc@ub.d.umn.edu> khuber@ub.d.umn.edu (Kevin Huber) writes:
>>>Sorry if this is a FAQ, but when are systems with the Pentium (aka P5
>>>aka 586) going to be on the market?
>

Soon after I receive my 486......

-- 
Pierre von Kaenel  |  Math & CS Dept | Skidmore College | pvonk@skidmore.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ads from premier issue of PC Tech Journal (Jul 83): 20MB Hard disk from
QCS - Cost: $2999.   Davong 5 MB int. hard disk... only $1465!
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: darrylo@sr.hp.com (Darryl Okahata)
Subject: Re: Why do we read PC mags?
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 19:35:20 GMT
Reply-To: darrylo@sr.hp.com
Organization: Hewlett-Packard / Center for Primal Scream Therapy
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8.1]

Gerry Roston (gerry@cmu.edu) wrote:

> I recently resubscribed to PC Magazine, and after having received the
> January 26 issue, I must ask myself why.  The columnists are total
> morons, the hardware reviews are wrong, self-contradictory and biased,
> and the ads are not as good or plentiful as the Computer Shopper.

     Although I stopped subscribing to any computer magazine a long time
ago, I don't think the reviews are all that bad (I do dislike the
columnists, though).  Occasionally, I'll go down to the local mall and
buy a copy of PC mag.

     "Plentiful" ads do not necessarily translate to "good".  To me, it
seems that many of the companies that people complain about in
comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware advertise in Computer Shopper and not in PC Mag
(not that PC Mag doesn't contain any).

     -- Darryl Okahata
	Internet: darrylo@sr.hp.com

DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion or policy of Hewlett-Packard or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: jdeaton@essex.ecn.uoknor.edu (James Deaton)
Subject: Old tape drive specs
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 20:53:04 GMT
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

I was recently given an ancient 'Archive' 40 meg unit, model #5540. 
Unfortunately I have no specs and no software.  If anyone has any information
on the jumper settings or compatible software I would really appreciate it.



-- 
		*************************************
		*          James E. Deaton          *
		*   jdeaton@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu   *
		*************************************
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Subject: Re: Test for Cache memory on ZEOS 486DX266 needed
Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 93 15:07:15 PST

In <C0I5Mo.5BB@unx.sas.com>:

>I recently purchased a ZEOS 486DX2-66 system and also got the
>256K cache upgrade option.  The system shipped with the cache
>but I am unable to determine if the system is acknowledging
>it's presence.

>Does anyone know of a way to test for additional cache memory?

I'd assume that some utilities which display system configuration might tell
you this.  On my machine (486SX/33 with AMI bios), I get a message at boot-up
which says "128 KB Cache found" or something like that.  I think that would
indicate that it's working.  I don't know about your system, though.

>I have pulled the cache and have not experienced any degrading
>effects on performance.  I will readily admit that I am not sure
>if my "test" results are accurate.

If you pulled the cache, I assume that it must be present and isn't vaporware.
So if it is in fact not recognized, there are hardware problems.

>I have heard some rumblings from ZEOS tech support folks that this
>item does not work and I am wondering if I have purchased vaporware...

What were the rumblings and where did you hear them?  If ZEOS tech support
knowingly sold you cache which wouldn't work, they're being sleazy.  In some
apps, it's hard to notice the difference that cache provides.

>PS:  There is no configuration for the cache in the BIOS setup, nor
>does it show up at boot time.

Really?  What BIOS are you using?  Does the BIOS even have a setting for the
*internal* cache (which a DX2/66, like all Intel 486s, has 8K of)?  Is this
machine using Fred's Fly By Night BIOS (tm)?


Tim Irvin
******************************************************************************
"In a free government the security for civil rights must be the same as that
 for religious rights." -- James Madison, Federalist #51
Lines: 10
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 09:10:18 MST
From: haymoree@alaska.et.byu.edu (Edward Haymore)
Subject: Need joystick technical info (WCII problems)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,sci.electronics
Organization: Brigham Young University, Provo UT USA
Keywords: joystick
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]

I've got a Suncom joystick on my PC that isn't working well with Wing 
Commander II.  Origin says that the Suncom joystick's circuitry doesn't 
allow the game to auto-calibrate the joystick correctly.
 
Is it possible to add/change the existing circuitry to make this work?
Anyone know how to do it?
 
--
Ed Haymore
ed@byu.edu
From: yuan1@husc10.harvard.edu (Nina Yuan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: MAG 15 inch: anybody have one?
Date: 13 Jan 93 02:02:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: husc.yuan1.726890559

2cd5huffinec@vms.csd.mu.edu (Christopher Huffine) writes:

>In article <1993Jan12.154511.11732@mlb.semi.harris.com>, gbrooksh@comanche.ess.harris.com (Greg Brookshire) writes:
>>I am thinking about buying a MAG 15 inch flat screen monitor.  Judging from
>>several ads and articles, it seems they are highly thought of, but I have
>>never actually seen one.
>>
>>Does anybody out there have one?  And if so, what do you think of it?

>I have one and agree with just about everything said in the PC MAG review of
>it.  Monitor judgments are very subjective, and unfortunately, often vary from
>sample to sample of one monitor brand and model.  Often, the image quality is
>greatly affected from such trivial thinggs as rough handling in shipment.  

I've been using mine for 3 months now and couldn't be happier with it.
The net.consensus at the time seemed to be that it was a very good monitor
at an excellent price, but that MAG had questionable quality control.  I
decided that the savings over a supposedly more consistent brand like NEC
was worth the risk.  Incidentally, I have a MAG 15F; there are different
versions of their 15" monitor; for instance, the one they produce for
Gateway under the Crystalscan label appears to have more problems.

Hope this helps,
-nhy








-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nina H. Yuan                               "It's a miracle that curiosity
Harvard College                             survives formal education."
yuan1@husc.harvard.edu                                  - Albert Einstein
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: moses@netcom.com (Lamont Cranston)
Subject: Re: Inkjet printers: Indelible ink?
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 20:32:47 GMT

mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael Rosen) writes:

>First off, is it correct to call the HP Deskjet an inkjet printer?

>What I'd like to know is if these printers use indelible ink now yet?
>I had heard that the ink tends to run if it gets wet or can just be
>smudged easily.  

>I'd like to be able to get a printer that can give me near-laser
>quality but be affordable.

>Thanks,
>Mike

Well, I dunno about "near laser quality" but the Deskjets are OK as far
as they go.  Yes they are definately are "Inkjets" they have little vials
of ink that they shoot at the paper.  The smearing problem has been mostly
solved by a new indellible ink that is now available.  The biggest factor
in Inkjet quality to me seems to be paper.  A nice smooth 20LB bond seems
to work best in mine.  Your milage may vary.

Monty


-- 
Lamont Cranston                        "I once had a plan, but it seems to
moses@netcom.com                        to have gone missing"
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: gjp@sei.cmu.edu (George Pandelios)
Subject: Comments on Adaptec 1522?
Organization: The Software Engineering Institute
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 11:48:43 EST


Folks,

I'm considering an Adaptec 1522 SCSI controller and Western Digital (~213 MB)
disk combination.  I'm interested in any comments or concerns from users of
this controller.  It will be installed on a Myoda 386DX-33 (ISA motherboard).

Some questions are:

1.  How reliable is it?
2.  Can it handle a tape backup unit?  I don't know much about these critters.
    QIC or DAT, any recommendations there that might affect the choice of 
    controller?

Thanks,

George
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  George J. Pandelios				Internet:  gjp@sei.cmu.edu
  Software Engineering Institute		usenet:	   sei!gjp
  4500 Fifth Avenue				Voice:	   (412) 268-7186
  Pittsburgh, PA 15213				FAX:	   (412) 268-5758
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Disclaimer:  These opinions are my own and do not reflect those of the
	     Software Engineering Institute, its sponsors, customers, 
	     clients, affiliates, or Carnegie Mellon University.  In fact,
	     any resemblence of these opinions to any individual, living
	     or dead, fictional or real, is purely coincidental.  So there.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: zatar@dadstoy.gbdata.com (Terry Stockdale)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: My floppies won't refresh
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 93 09:13:00 -0600
Organization: Lots of little files on drive D:

In <1993Jan7.030106.1112@mlb.semi.harris.com> sonny@charybdis.harris-atd.com (Bob Davis) writes:
>In article <93006.0602030407658@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> <0407658@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> writes:
>>I have a new 486 DX-66 and have found that when trying to install software
>>from either floppy drive, I often ran into problems.  It seemed that
>>even though I had "Inserted disk #2 in drive B:", the installation program
>>still detected disk 1.  To try to isolate the problem, I booted from a
>
>	Sounds like a pin 34 -- Change Disk line -- problem on the
>floppy cable. If the floppy drive problem(s) are on a 3.5" drive, look
>at the area on the drive near the floppy cable connector. Often
>there is a small adapter card that adapts between the floppy cable
>connector and the connector on the drive proper. On that little pc
>board adapter is often a jumper that can be tailored to make the
>Change Disk line work properly with different computers. Change the
>jumper pin to the other position and see if your problems go away.

Or, as I found out the hard way, it means that you've got a dust buildup
on the read-heads of your floppy drive.  Mine don't get much use, except
to install a new program.  However, that little slot pulls air through 
the computer ALL the time (my usenet site runs 24 hrs/day).  A can of
compressed air does wonders for solving this problem.  Note, also, that
tape backups use light sensors to see the end-of-tape holes in DC2000
series tapes -- dust means the tape will unspool, requiring you to take
the tape apart and then reassemble it.
--

-- 
__
"Even if you're on the right track, 
you'll get run over if you don't move."  --Will Rogers.

terry@dadstoy.gbdata.com	Terry Stockdale		Houston, Texas
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: lcc@security (Lee C. Cooper)
Subject: Gateway2000 486DX-33 ??
Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 22:08:32 GMT


I'm thinking of purchasing a Gateway 2000 486DX-33.
Does anyone have any experience with this particular model or
something similar?
      
I've heard some not so flattering things about their
14" CrystalScan 1024NI monitor. Is it that bad?
                        
I'm also thinking of getting their Telepath Fax/Modem. Does
anyone know if Gateway ever straightened out the problems
they were having with this model?
 
Also, does anyone know how bad/good the Mini Desktop Case and/or
monitor is as far as EM emanations are concerned? 
 
Thanks in advance,
   
Lee Cooper
From: TKSGJVV@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Wanted 386/486 Motherboard for IBM AT
Date: 4 Jan 93 15:08:31 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo

I would like to upgrade my sons IBM/AT to either a 386/486 machine.
If anybody has a used board for sale I would be interested....
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: eross@uwovax.uwo.ca
Subject: Rodime 9015 and Win3.1 - problem?
Organization: University of Western Ont, London
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 03:54:53 GMT

Help!

I used to have Win3.1 on my machine but removed it due to space constraints.
About 6 months ago I bought a second drive and things have been fine until I 
tried to install Win3.1 again.  Now, it locks up when it hits the GUI on
install.  I've finally tracked the problem down to my hard drives.  When I have
the first drive (Segate 3144A set to drive 1 in a two drive system) and disable
the second drive (a Rodime 9015) in BIOS, Windows works just fine.  I may not
have the Rodime set correctly as I don't know the jumper settings.  As an
aside, everyother program I have works just fine with both drives connected,
including OS/2 and Windows 3.0.

Any suggestions?  I'd appreciate the jumper settings for the Rodime if anyone
has them.

Thanks.
-- 
Evan Ross
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western Foot Patrol, University of Western Ontario, Lambton Hall,
1421 Western Rd., London, Ontario, N6G 4W4
(519) 661-3650	 Fax (519) 661-3687
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: dinhyen@nevada.edu (Dinh-Yen Tran)
Subject: THANKS...
Organization: University of Nevada, Las Vegas Electrical Engr.
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 18:11:14 GMT

Thanks to all who responded to my post on memory chip size.  For anyone who
is interested, KM41C1000AP-7 indicates 70-ns 1Mx1-bit DIP made by Samsung.
With regards,
Dinh-yen
dinhyen@redrock.nevada.edu

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: tima_kim@hgova.enet.dec.com ()
Subject: IBM 5541 PC and TDOS
Reply-To: tima_kim@hgova.enet.dec.com ()
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 08:37:02 GMT


Hello,

Does anyone know anything about IBM 5541 PC and TDOS ?

Thanks.
From: cholette@saguenay.iro.umontreal.ca (Martin Cholette)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: atari joystick -> ibm gameport?
Date: 3 Jan 93 22:13:34 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Universite de Montreal, Canada

In article <1993Jan3.181902.2440@gmuvax2.gmu.edu> esaffle@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Ed Saffle) writes:
>  After having completely cleaned up my storage closet I found an old
>joystick that I used with the atari 2600 and the Commodore 64/128
>when I was younger.  The stick is in REALLY good shape, and I don't have
>one for my 386.  Now the quesiton is, can I build an adapter that will
>make this possible?  Being realistic about all this, it should be possible,
>but I have no idea how to do it, and I *have* heard rumors that such a thing
>exists.  Anyone know how?
>
>Ed

 This will not be as easy as it looks since both joysticks are of different
 type. The Atari joystick has four swithches that are either turned on or
 off depending on the position of the stick. But the IBM joystick has two
 analog position meters that track the position of the joystick, this allows
 for a level of flexibility and added control ability. I don't think thaT one 
 can be easily converted to the other.

 Also, a good IBM joystick cost $20 - $30 so why would you even consider spending hours trying to convert an old, cheap ATARI2600 joystick??? I suggest that
 you buy a new joystick and use your time at something more constructive.
 But this is only my humble opinion.

 Martin Cholette
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: pjsmith@iastate.edu (Phil J Smith)
Subject: need special cable
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 02:01:24 GMT

I have an interesting problem.  I am attempting to install DOS on a Micronics
4X Xterminal.  In order to do this, I have to install a hard drive, floppy
drive and a video card.  I have a Diamond Speedstar 24x video card.  The 
Micronics manual says that I need a VGA pass-thru cable to connect the card
to the Micronics built in card via the VGA feature connector.  It is a 26
pin ribbon cable.  My question is where can I find such a cable?  Or, 
does anyone know the pinouts for the Xterminal?  I have the pinouts for the
Speedstar and it says it conforms to the VESA standard.  Help! I am desperate,
I have called Micronics three times in the last few days and have gotten an
answering machine each time and they have yet to return my call.   In fact,
they have never answered ANY of the calls I have made in the last 2 weeks!!!


Any help would be GREATLY appreciated,


Phil Smith
From: knier@miller.cs.uwm.edu (Robert Knier )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Future Domain (TMC 950) info needed
Date: 11 Jan 1993 02:16:31 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.9.13



	I just picked up a Future Domain compatible card (its called the
Dandy 3400).  This card uses the TMC 950 chip.  Would anyone know the 
differnce between this chip and the TMC 885?  Where could I get technical
info?  What is the number of the Future Domain BBS?  Many thanks in advance!



Bob Knier
(knier@miller.cs.uwm.edu)


Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware