HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis)
Subject: Re: All I have to say
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 06:56:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.150207.6560@unislc.uucp> jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske) writes:
>rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>
>>As long as the the Western branches of Pravda are controlling the U.S.
>>mass media, you're right, he won't stand a chance.  Unfortunately.  
>
>>As to Clinton's likliness of destroying the economy: in the unusual event
>>that he doesn't accomplish this on his own, I'm sure that Gorey Al and
>>Herr Hillary will help him to do so, as will some of his other advisors
>>and those friends of his, who have hidden in the background, such as
>>the Rev. Jessie "Ah hates dem whities" Jackson, Mario Coomo (as the
>>"Rev." Jackson pronounces it), Bella "Let's outlaw religion" Abzug, 
>>Anita "Ah slept everywhere" Hill, and Sen. Ted "Dunk her in the water"
>>Kennedy, and the rest of the Tax and Spend, lets Leave America Defenseless
>>crowd.
>
>Ha Ha Ha He He He Ho Ho ...this stuff is great satire.  Really good send
>up of a stark raving mad, foaming at the mouth, Republican (my apologies
>to sane Republicans) sore loser.  What...this isn't satire?  Gulp.

Egads... it looks as though my message was taken the wrong way, what?  Can't
have that, I'd better add the following to straighten things out.

Guess I should have added that I'm not a sore loser... I'll actually be
smiling through some of the next four years as I watch Bill Clinton
make a fool of himself and will watch those who voted for him grimmace in
despair :-) :-) :-)  much to my amusement.  Rush Limbaugh will be there
to point out the best examples of the blunders. :-)

One last thing, you might be surprised to know that I am not that bad of
a conservative.  I do believe in supporting the women's movement... by allowing
attractive women to sit on my lap! :-)  I also enjoy watching the women's
movement from front, side and rear views!  Now then, don't let anyone
tell you that some of us conservatives do not support the women's movement.
...and you probably thought that only Ted Kennedy supported the feminists to 
this extent.

>p.s. Seek some counseling

p.s. I may need that advice by the time the next four years are over, as 
will most Americans who are presently sane.  Thanks for the advice.  



-- 
Robert D. Davis            |  VAX/VMS is a text-only adventure game.  If       
rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu  !  you win, you get to use UNIX.  If you fail, 
uunet!mystica!rdd          |  you get to use an IBM-PC running MeSsy-DOS
Telephone: 1-410-744-7964  !  with MeSsy-Windows or an Apple Macintosh.  
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu (Eiji Hirai)
Subject: Re: The Official Internet Quayle Quote List (Part 2 of 2)
Organization: Information Services, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 06:39:04 GMT

brey@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Ed Brey) writes:
> wrote a C program to randomly pick out one flail and diplay
> it on standard output.

Uh, I think you''ve rewritten the wheel.  It's already been done and is
ftp-able from:

ftp.uu.net:/usenet/comp.sources.games/volume1/fortune.

It was easy to convert Danny's quotes into this fortune database and I use
it every day.

--
hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu (Eiji Hirai)    :     :    :   :  : :: ::: :::: :::::
Unix Geek for Swarthmore College        :     :    :   :  : :: ::: :::: :::::
Information Services, Swarthmore, PA, US.       Copyright 1992 by Eiji Hirai.
I don't speak for Swarthmore College.                    All Rights Reserved.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cstanto@nyx.cs.du.edu (Cat Stanton)
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
               it is DEATHLY slow, use ONLY in emergency situations
               like posts like this.  :)
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 07:28:36 GMT

In article <1382@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
>: rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>:  
>: : Unfortunately, Billy Boy & Gorey Al  won the election even though the peo
>: : did select President Bush and VP Quayle via the popular vote.  What a sa
>I seem to have missed the original post on this so perhaps I missed
>the point, but could somebody clue me in?  Last time I looked,
>Clinton won the popular vote.  Has there been a secret recount?
>Bill

Bill, hi, sorry you missed Mr. Davis' fine piece of work.
We here at alt.fan.dan-quayle have concluded thusly that his
statement resulted from one or more of the following:

a)  Going blind from doing some hand-to-*nevermind* combat on his side of
    the terminal, thereby having to rely on what someone ELSE told hims as
    the results.

b)  Having taken math courses which were tutored by our boy himself...
    Dano...also not the brightest math student.

c)  Orrr perhaps taking up Sally Struthers on her offer to train him in
    math in JUST 3 weeks of his spare time at home...

d)  Suffering a JHU-brain fart (tm) from that wild and wacky Baltimorean(sic)
    watter and meaning to put Clinton and Gore where he put Bush and  Quayle.

e)  Accepting payments from Tucker Quayle to defend his daddy.  (Maddy's
    idea not mine).

There you go Bill -- not necessarily meant to be humorous although I
personally feel that Mr. Davis' misinformation stemmed from situation
a...  After noting his attitude towards women I feel that MUST be the
reason.

Cat
(if you gotta reply to this do so to stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu please)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dan Quayle?  
From: rbd@flash.ece.uc.edu (Bobby Davis)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 18:21:22 GMT
Organization: University of Cincinnati, ECE Dept

Xmodem writes:
>Anybody have any news about what he's doing now that he's no longer gonna 
>be Vice President.  Can't really imagina he'd win race as a senator or 
>anything.  I'm depressed.  Or maybe not.

Unfortunately, because Bush/Quayle carried Indiana, I believe that he
probably could whitebread his way back into the Senate.  Or he may end up
working the graveyard shift at a 7-11 - a serious possibility, because
most 7-11 cash registers these days tell you how much change to give.

It would be hilarious, given his campaign drivel, if he went back into
law (his pre-politics profession) or journalism (his family's business).

The other Robert Davis
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: tom@uts.cc.wayne.edu (Thomas Richard Stevenson)
Subject: Re: Actual Dan Quayle Interview
Organization: Wayne State Univ.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 16:49:05 GMT

<BFANTLE@auvm.american.edu> writes:

>I want to thank you for posting the Quayle Interview.  I found it interesting.
> I was very annoyed with all the stupid comments that were in the <>.  You are
>entitled to your opinion obviously, but put it at the end or at least not in th
>e middle of the paragraphs.  Maybe if you were funnier I wouldn't mind.

>Thanks again,

>barry
Thanks for me also. I found V.P. Quayle very interesting! I could have done
without the <>s. They added nothing.
-- 
     ____  __   __       Tom@UTS.CC.Wayne.Edu
      /   /_/  /_        Thomas_Richard_Stevenson@MTS.CC.Wayne.Edu
     /.  /\ . __/.       Tom@CMS.CC.Wayne.Edu
                         UserTom@WayneMTS.Bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: garrett@Ingres.COM (It's not what you got, it's what you give)
Subject: Re: Complete this sentence
Summary: Politically correct  
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Keywords: 
Organization: ASK Computer Systems, Ingres Product Division
Date: 5 Nov 92 05:17:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.144259@IASTATE.EDU>, danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)                     writes...
>In article <22939@duke.cs.duke.edu>, ingram@cs.duke.edu (Robert "E" Ingram)
>writes:
>> If Bush is a "lame duck", then Quayl is a _____ ______.
> 
>Locomotivly impaired aquatic foul?

That's locomotivly "challenged".
> 
>Dan
>Danwell@IASTATE.EDU
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Maybe we won't miss Dan so much...
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 07:24:49 CST
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton) writes:

> In article <6BF2TB4w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> elendil@mintir.new-orleans
> >liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu) writes:
> >
> >> are they going to grandma's house or something?
> >> I hope 30-40 SS agents are enough to take care of the big bad wolf.
> >
> >30-40 SS agents are enough to take care of the armies of most small
> >countries...
> >
> >
> Maybe not take care of small countries, but 30-40 SS agents just MIGHT
> be enough to handle Tipper's hair products and makeup accessories.  *smirk*
> (Aww I love ol' Tipper but come on...you know I"m right)
>
> Cat
>

hehehe...yeah, that's a serious head of hair.  However, if Tipper wanted to get
lost in the woods with *me*, I probably wouldn't complain :-)

Of course, I'd make sure I didn't bring along any Metallica or Guns 'N Roses
tapes for mood music... :-)



|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: tom@uts.cc.wayne.edu (Thomas Richard Stevenson)
Subject: Re: Actual Dan Quayle Interview
Organization: Wayne State Univ.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 15:21:57 GMT

hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Matt Hucke) writes:

>In article <92317.005802KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick) writes:
>)
>)Maybe -you're- new here, you act like it.  Many people here ARE fans of
>)Dan Quayle.  You obviously are not, but it's not relevant.  The point is,
>)the comments were more hateful and annoying than they were funny.

>Where did this jerk come from, and when is he going back?
                ^^^^

>This newsgroup is for making fun of Danny Boy.  It always has been.  Just
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>because a few Republican hatemongers have been trying to take it over doesn't
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>mean the group's purpose has flip-flopped.

It's funny that you call someone a jerk, you call some Republicans 
hatemongers, all at the same time that you condone making fun of someone. 
I think that Republicans aren't the only hatemongers around here! Why is
there not enough room for both view points? And why do we (on both side)
have to resort to name calling? There is only one thing worse than a bad
loser, and that's a bad winner. No one is trying to take this group over.
No one is suggesting the groups purpose should flip-flop. It has turned 
into two groups yelling at each other. Why can't people grow up?
-- 
     ____  __   __       Tom@UTS.CC.Wayne.Edu
      /   /_/  /_        Thomas_Richard_Stevenson@MTS.CC.Wayne.Edu
     /.  /\ . __/.       Tom@CMS.CC.Wayne.Edu
                         UserTom@WayneMTS.Bitnet
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: My Theory
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 08:38:11 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann) writes:

> Consider:
> 
> Kurt Ludwick and Robert Davis are the same poster.

Well, I believe in giving Kurt a break. Robert Davis is a xenophobic
hate-mongerer; Kurt is just misguided by somehow believing that supply
side economics (trickle-down, voodoo economics, whatever) worked as an
economic theory and if Bush had just stuck to it we'd all be basking in
the glorious and prosperous sunshine of capitalist Republicanism now.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: After 4 years, a good nights sleep...
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 06:15:35 CST
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick) writes:

> In article <F5V2TB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us>,
> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) says:
>
> >Actually, while still essentially conservative, most of the Nixon/Ford era o
> >judges weren't these whacked-out ideologues we have seen from Raygun and The
> >Shrub.
>
> O'Connor, and David Souter, 'whacked-out ideologues'?  What the...?
>
> ------------
> Kurt Ludwick
> ------------

Boy, first picking on Maddi, now taking things out of context...you *are* new
here, aren't you?  Time to crawl back to your hole, now.




|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
From: KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: After 4 years, a good nights sleep...
Date: 12 Nov 92 21:54:51 GMT
 <o9k5TB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us>

In article <o9k5TB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us>,
elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) says:
>KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick) writes:
>> >Actually, while still essentially conservative, most of the Nixon/Ford era
>> >judges weren't these whacked-out ideologues we have seen from Raygun and

>> O'Connor, and David Souter, 'whacked-out ideologues'?  What the...?

>Boy, first picking on Maddi, now taking things out of context...you *are* new
>here, aren't you?  Time to crawl back to your hole, now.

How is this out of context?  You said that Reagan and Bush appointed
'whacked-out' ideologues (which I infer to mean 'conservative and pro-
life', am I wrong?), and I corrected you.  Please explain how I took
anything out of context.

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
From: mazzarel@spam.berkeley.edu (Ariel Mazzarelli)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: YOU MAKE THE CALL
Date: 6 Nov 1992 10:48:18 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Math. Department.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: spam.berkeley.edu

It is Monday,  December 14,  1992.  You are a member of the California
delegation to the Electoral College.  [If you have a deer brain,  you are 
reminded that Clinton carried California.]  Today you will cast your vote
for the next president of the US.  You and the other state delegates are
gathered in the state capital,  Sacramento,  eagerly anticipating the
historical moment.

Although tradition and voter intent compel you to vote for Clinton,  you are
not legally obligated to do so.

One of the traditions on this day is that you listen to some speeches before
voting.  Among the featured speakers is lame duck President George Bush.

When Bush comes on,  he announces that,  should the electoral college vote
against him,  he will resign the office immediately.

You know what that means.

Four more years of Bush,  or six weeks of Dan.

You make the call.

Ariel
From: mazzarel@spam.berkeley.edu (Ariel Mazzarelli)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: a response to Robert Davis
Date: 13 Nov 92 10:13:55 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Math. Department.
NNTP-Posting-Host: spam.berkeley.edu

In article <BxJL2E.373@news.cso.uiuc.edu> cka52397@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Slartibartfast) writes:
>[Kinder,  gentler diagnosis of Rdavis syndrome,  mistakenly attributed to
  some guy named John who might me dissuaded from suing for slander]
>Gosh, John,
>can't you take a loss?  I don't think Carter's people were so bad in 1980.

Speak for yourself man.  At Berkeley we wore black armbands and marched down
to the BART station the day after Reagan won the first time.  I think somebody
even burned a flag.

Am I the kind that says "I told you so"?  :)

Ariel
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann)
Subject: Re: seconding the motion....
Organization: Society for Putting Things on Top of Other Things
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 01:43:32 GMT

In article <1992Nov7.001225.1422@odin.corp.sgi.com> lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford) writes:
>
>I'm not sure where you're located, but one of the local network
>reporters reported on Tuesday night, after talking to Wilson, that
>Wilson was LIVID about having to give the appearance of supporting the
>GOP platform (he's pro-choice, a moderate Republican, etc.) knowing
>full well that that BS wouldn't fly in CA.  Wilson was particularly
>angry that he couldn't present Seymour in a more moderate light under
>the circumstances, and felt that the GOP lost CA immediately after the
>convention in Houston.  He also believed that our boy (Quayle, that
>is) hurt Bush's chances not only in CA but in other "moderate" states.
>
>The reporter predicted  that Wilson would come out swinging sometime 
>soon, possibly in an attempt to distance himself from the far-right 
>coalition that seems to have seized control of the party.  While I'm
>no undying fan of Wilson, I do believe that he is a more moderate
>Republican voice.  It's going to be interesting to see what happens
>to the GOP.  I predict a split into two separate parties.

Wilson blew it big time.  He refused to force a floor fight on the
abortion plank, because he didn't want to go against Bush.  Seymour
was going to take up the fight, but Wilson convinced him to make
nice as well.  Wilson skipped the California Republican Convention;
Seymour made one speech and then left town.  Now, if Wilson had
taken the elephant by the tusks, he could have convinced Californians
of his integrity and his belief in his positions, but he went and
HID.  The Republicans will be in for some nasty fighting, and
now, not even the Moderates trust Wilson because he hasn't shown
any leadership in anything: he couldn't get a budget agreement without
having a 63-day pissing contest, he couldn't get his referendum
passed, and he couldn't get Seymour to stay in the Senate.

Wilson's approval ratings are 31% now, and if he doesn't show some
leadership pronto, he's going to be swearing Kathleen Brown in as
our next Governor in 1994 (hey! and Dan will be running, too!)
 

-- 
Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer.  Take your pick.

Centigram Communications Corp, San Jose California  408/428-3553
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Weekly Reader wrong! Who else?
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 09:59:51 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell) writes:

> The Conventional wisdom that nobody has become President in the last 50 
> years without taking Texas is dead.  It's been done now.

Nixon won in 1968 without taking Texas. However, I believe that no Democrat
has ever been elected president before now without taking Texas, since
Texas became a state.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: gbrown@Elroy.UH.EDU (G. Brown)
Subject: Re: Letterman Top 10 reasons Bush lost
Reply-To: gbrown@Elroy.UH.EDU
Organization: University of Houston
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 04:34:58 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.192921.60582@cc.usu.edu>, slgsn@cc.usu.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov6.220537.7774@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, myrab@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (myra.bronstein) writes:
>> Thought *fer sure* that someone would have posted this,
>> but since no one has...
>> 
>> Letterman--Top 10 Reasons Bush Lost the Election--
>>>>#1 reason<<:
>> 
>> 1) Quayle is no Stockdale
>> 
>> Myra
>   Dave-Utah State

Temper, temper, Dave at Utah State.  I wonder how manmiddle-class (I assume
that you qualify) hand-outs you have received in your life but about which you
never think (but about which you would think hard and long if they were
taken away; thi here, as just one example, of the tax break k on mortgage
interest that those too poor to buy a home cannot take advantage of.)  In any
event, most liberals who deserve the label--I mean the intellectual types who
take the ideological debates seriously--are generally at least as well off as
I assume that you are and hence are looking for no more in the way of
"hand-outs" than you are.  Unlike the truly rich who were drooling at the
trough to get that capital gains tax cut from their favorite wet nurse, the
Grand Old Party. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Gregory Brown          |   "God is, as it were, the sewer into which       |
| Dept. of Philosophy    |           all contradictions flow"                |
| University of Houston  |                                                   |
| Houston, TX 77204-3785 |               --G. W. F. Hegel                    |
| GBROWN@JETSON.UH.EDU   |        Lectures on the History of Philosophy      |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: awells@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Andrew V. Wells)
Subject: Re: spelling in this newsgroup (was Re: ignore)
Summary: ignore
Keywords: a.f.d-q
Organization: Northeastern University
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 20:42:12 GMT

In article <chil.720905568@sfu.ca>, chil@fraser.sfu.ca (Keith Lim) writes:
> awells@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Andrew V. Wells) writes:
> 
> >Hasta La Vista, George!
> >Adios, Danoe!
> >Chow, a.f.d-q!
>  ^^^^
> In this newsgroup in particular, you should be careful how you spell words.
> 
What's wrong with using a phonetic spelling? Of course, in Italy 
it would be uncool to spell 'ciao' as 'chow'.


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis)
Subject: Re: Aren't we forgetting something?
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 06:23:39 GMT

In article <1ddel9INNkgp@agate.berkeley.edu> mazzarel@spam.berkeley.edu (Ariel Mazzarelli) writes:

>Bush and all those other Republitypes to get the hell out of our face.

Don't you wish that we would! :-)  We're still here and we're not going away,
so... don't breathe too much of a sigh of releif.  That's right, we're going
to stay in your face just as all of the members of your special interest
groups, such as feminists (barf!), taxaholics (gaag!), environmentalists,
etc. have been staying in our faces.  Have a nice day. :-)

>And who knows how many others voted for Bush,  and are actually relieved that
>he lost.  I think that lots of Republican voters just can't move their muscles
>so as to avoid voting for Bush (some sort of congenital cerebellum thing).  

You've got it all wrong and still don't know it.  I send my condolences.


************************************************
WARNING: The above is rated C (for conservative)
and is not politically correct.
************************************************



-- 
Robert D. Davis            |  VAX/VMS is a text-only adventure game.  If       
rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu  !  you win, you get to use UNIX.  If you fail, 
uunet!mystica!rdd          |  you get to use an IBM-PC running MeSsy-DOS
Telephone: 1-410-744-7964  !  with MeSsy-Windows or an Apple Macintosh.  
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jberger@novell.com (John Berger)
Subject: Re: USA President's power to pardon
Organization: Novell, Inc.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 01:43:09 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.172059.13600@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
>In article <92315.083523MBADBH@rohvm1.rohmhaas.com> David B. Horvath, CDP <
MBADBH@rohvm1.rohmhaas.com> writes:>>Bush could avoid all chances of 
prosecution by pardoning all of his {alleged}>>co-conspiritors in the IRAN-
CONTRA-GATE.>>
>>The pardon in itself would not stop the special prosecutor; but how's this
>>deal sound: in return for a full pardon, Bush would resign shortly before
>>the end of his term (mid-Novermber to mid-December) allowing J. Dan Quayle
>>to become president for a short time.  JDQ could then pardon Bush and end
>>the entire sorrid affair.
>>
>>What would Dan get out of this?  The only chance to become president, even
>>if just for a short time.
>>
>>Is this legal?  Could it be a conspiracy??
>>
>>   - David
>
>I think this is a plan all a.f.d-q ers would support....
>r

I think this is a plan all a.f.dick_nixon and a.f.gerald_ford would support, 
too.....
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6512 alt.politics.bush:13580 alt.politics.clinton:16509