From: s0xjg@exnet.co.uk (Xavier Gallagher)
Newsgroups: alt.astrology
Subject: Re: Mr Cern
Date: 29 Sep 92 00:06:00 GMT
Organization: ExNet Systems Ltd Public Access News, London, UK

In article <28SEP199212181187@vxcrna.cern.ch> casper@vxcrna.cern.ch (CASPER,DAVI./PPE) writes:
>In article <Bv9G60.5E0@exnet.co.uk>, s0xjg@exnet.co.uk (Xavier Gallagher) writes...
>
>
>Hmm, finally a chart interpretation I can sink my teeth into.
>
>It is odd that this is so negative, I have heard from others here that I "have
>a very nice chart".   But oh well.
>
>Well, I too am sticking my neck out by revealing personal information in a
>largely hostile forum.  No doubt I will live to regret it.
>
>>I have been looking at his birthchart.  Assuming it is right and that
>>I have some skill in this area and that astrology works I have come to
>>some conclusions.  These are not psychological observations as pycho
>>astrology cannot be proved right or wrong.  Hopefully these are testable.
>>Actually I tell a lie, 1 psycho astrology observation sneaked in.
>
>>1. His father is either physicaly injured (damaged) or in a bad material
>>   situation. He returns often. 
>
>Can't answer the first two because the third is about as wrong as it could
>be.  My parents were divorced before I was born and I have never met my
>father.
>
>>2. He (Dave) has no sense of restriction or responsibility.
>
>Hmm. Tough for me to answer this one.  I will not claim to be the most
>responsible person in the world.  On the other hand I have not done so badly
>for myself.
>
>>3. Daves' Mother is/was held in high esteem,especialy by the native.  
>>   However she is probably dead or seldom seen.
>
>Mom's an evangelist, and we haven't gotten along terribly well at all since
>she got religion.  While she is my mother, I cannot say I hold her in unusually
>high esteem, since I believe she has basically become brainwashed.  She works
>in the Phillipines, so the second part is correct (congratulations).
>
>>4. Dave has no children and never will have.
>
>No children at present.  We'll have to wait on the latter.
>
>>5. Daves' body is physicaly damaged.  I be tempted to say he is in a wheel
>>   chair but Venus is in its' own face.  As it is I can only say he is
>>   physically very weak.
>
>Nah, while I wouldn't say I have an athletic physique, I am physically quite
>active and generally very healthy.  I have a large build and cannot be
>considered physically weak.
>
>>6. Scar on his face,(a burn or red mark) halfway down his face. Possibly
>>   there is a scare on his hips.
>
>Nope.
>
>>7. As a child spent lots of time in an institution, probably a hospital
>>   but considering the positions of the moon and saturn it could be an
>>   orphanage.
>
>Nope.  Hospitalized three times (for about 1 week each)...once for tonsils,
>once for pneumonia, and once for appendectomy.  Never seen an orphanage.
>
>>8. Heck! just not a healthy person.
>
>I think you're basically incorrect about this.
>
>>9. One brother and two sisters.  Failing this at least more sisters than
>>   brothers.  Not an only child.
>
>Bzzzt.  Only child.
>
>>10.Many enemies both open and secret brought about through having a big
>>   mouth and rapier pen. Constantly surrounded by strife.  Many are women
>>   and many are figures of authority, many he considers to be his freinds.
>
>Well, obviously I wouldn't know about secret enemies.  I tend to be quite
>frank about my opinions (you'd have never guessed, would you?) which puts some
>people off, but I cannot say I have any "open enemies" (outside alt.astrology,
>I suppose).  And unfortunately, one doesn't meet many women authority figures
>in my line of work.
>
>>   Dave will marry once or not at all. Venus is crap,moon in the 8th but
>>   Jupe in the 7th. This relationship has many ups and downs with the
>>   partner leaving and coming back much like a boomerang.  If Dave is as
>>   damaged as his Venus indicates this partner might not be a marriage
>>   partner but maybe a carer of some sort. Perhaps a nurse or a doctor.
>
>Not married yet.  The future is unwritten...
>
>>Hope these are right.  My astrological head is on the block here.
>
>Gee I hope you were really giving what you knew to be diametrically opposite to
>the correct interpretation in the hopes I'd contradict you.  Otherwise you'd
>better go back to the drawing board.
>
>Thanks for trying though.  Now using what I've revealed here, everyone else can
>go back and say "oh yeah, that makes sense, look at this aspect here..."
>
>
>Dave
>

Your right......back to the drawing board :-)
Basicly right about parents. Both damaged
Very surprised that you a physically ok. 
Still,my flat mate disagreed..
Brothers and sisters? You don't know about that.

But mostly I was wrong.........shit.
Xavier.