HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Organization: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:02:57 EST
From:         Ratilal.R.Haria@NRC.CA
Subject:      Mail forwarding Problem - SEND cmd??

Hi,
  While trying to determine the mail forwarding problem, I asked
  the user at COLOSPGS, to mail me some mail.

  During the process, he mentioned that he *never* uses mail, and
  generaly uses send command. I tried using it and failed with the
  msg "receiver has not authorized user". So  how does he do it?

  Anyways the mail he sent was not forwarded and yet the "Q RDR"
  tells me it is mail.


Ratilal

**************************************************************
 <<<< Q RDR >>>

q rdr all
ORIGINID FILE CLASS RECORDS  CPY HOLD DATE  TIME     NAME      TYPE     DIST
RSCS     0005 M PUN 00000009 001 NONE 01/22 15:23:55 MGRABOWS  MAIL     COLOSPGS
RRH      0002 A PUN 00000005 001 NONE 01/22 14:39:54 RRH       NOTE     HARIA
RRH      0004 M PUN 00000007 001 NONE 01/22 14:42:15 RRH       MAIL     NRCVM01

 <<<<<<  his mail >>>>>>
Date:     Fri, 22 Jan 1993 13:24 MDT
From:     <MGRABOWSKI@COLOSPGS>
Subject:  tests
To:       mailmnt@nrcvm01
Original_To:  BITNET%"mailmnt@nrcvm01"

This is a message using "mail" command. Actually, i never use it
this way. Generally i'm using "send" command
                marek
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:24:42 EST
From:         Ratilal.R.Haria@NRC.CA
Subject:      Re: Forwarding problem
              22 Jan 1993 12:51:41 CST from <MARK@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>

On Fri, 22 Jan 1993 12:51:41 CST Mark R. Williamson said:
>Since COLOSPGS is defined with no mailer tag, it is probably sending mail
>directly to the user's reader, bypassing MAILER entirely.  You can't
>fault MAILER for not forwarding mail it never sees.
>

 Sorry for the question, but what do  you mean "with no  mailer tag".
 I was under the impression, the mail from COLOSPGS had all the mailer
 tags. Comparing it with other mail, the only difference I could see
 was the extra "Original_TO:" tag.

>Should the file forwarding machine try to forward these mail files?
>(I forget the latest status, but at one time it only forwarded to NJE
>nodes?)  Are you using it?  Does the user have file forwarding active?
>
  Otherwise everything is working. Mail from other sites are being
  forwarded and the user has the file active.


Thanks Mark,


**********************************************

Date:     Wed, 20 Jan 1993 12:28 MDT
From:     <MGRABOWSKI@COLOSPGS>
Subject:  test message II
To:       mailmnt@nrcvm01
Original_To:  BITNET%"mailmnt@nrcvm01"

this is the second reply to the test messgeage
        i'm sending it to mailmnt@nrcvm01
                marek
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 11:08:47 EST
From:         Ratilal.R.Haria@NRC.CA
Subject:      Forwarding problem

Hi,

  Has anybody experienced the following problem? One of users has
  used the Mailer's forward command to forward all his mail to a
  Unix workstation  and it worked except for the following case.

  However when he logged in recently to his VM account, he saw
  some mail sitting in his reader that was not forwarded. The
  sending host is "colospgs". The test mail is below.

Thanks ... Ratilal
======================================================================
Ratilal Haria, Network Analyst/Postmaster Networks Branch
Personalized: Ratilal.Haria@NRC.CA        Finance & Informatics Services
Internet: rrh@vm.nrc.ca                   National Research Council
Bitnet:   rrh@nrcvm01                     Rm 103A, Bld M-60
Voice:    (613) 993-0240                  Montreal Road
Fax:      (613) 954-2561                  Ottawa, Ont, Canada K1A 0R6
======================================================================

**********************************************************************

Date:     Wed, 20 Jan 1993 12:28 MDT
From:     <MGRABOWSKI@COLOSPGS>
Subject:  test message II
To:       mailmnt@nrcvm01
Original_To:  BITNET%"mailmnt@nrcvm01"

this is the second reply to the test messgeage
        i'm sending it to mailmnt@nrcvm01
                marek
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:33:52 CST
From:         "Mark R. Williamson" <MARK@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Forwarding problem
              22 Jan 1993 14:24:42 EST from <Ratilal.R.Haria@NRC.CA>

On Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:24:42 EST <Ratilal.R.Haria@NRC.CA> said:
>On Fri, 22 Jan 1993 12:51:41 CST Mark R. Williamson said:
>>Since COLOSPGS is defined with no mailer tag, it is probably sending mail
>>directly to the user's reader, bypassing MAILER entirely.  You can't
>>fault MAILER for not forwarding mail it never sees.
>
> Sorry for the question, but what do  you mean "with no  mailer tag".
> I was under the impression, the mail from COLOSPGS had all the mailer
> tags. Comparing it with other mail, the only difference I could see
> was the extra "Original_TO:" tag.

Sorry for the confusion.  I should have said "COLOSPGS has no :mailer tag
in its entry in BITEARN NODES", which is to say that they have not
registered a mailer to handle incoming or outgoing mail.  This is no
guarantee that they have none, but it is an indication.  So is the lack
of Received: lines in the header of the sample message you gave.

You might try writing to somebody at COLOSPGS to verify my conjecture.
Rob Garvie (GARVIE@COLOSPGS) is mentioned in several roles in their node
entry in BITEARN NODES.

By the way, is the blank line that follows the "***" line in your sample
really in the message as received?

>**********************************************
>
>Date:     Wed, 20 Jan 1993 12:28 MDT
>From:     <MGRABOWSKI@COLOSPGS>
>Subject:  test message II
>To:       mailmnt@nrcvm01
>Original_To:  BITNET%"mailmnt@nrcvm01"
>
>this is the second reply to the test messgeage
>        i'm sending it to mailmnt@nrcvm01
>                marek

Mark R. Williamson, Rice U., Houston TX; MARK@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU or @RICEVM1
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 08:56:00 EST
From:         "Bill Verity (814) 865-4758" <WHV@PSUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      NETDATA defaults should be set for MAILER machine

I found that I had to set the NETDATA RECEIVE NOPROMPT default in the MAILER
userid.  There are times, particularly errors, when a file is received and
without the NOPROMPT option, you get a prompt about what to do.  Of course
the prompt is never answered, so you're hung.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Drexel University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:35:44 EST
From:         Richard Varenas <VARENAS@DUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Error MAISMT050E

Would someone please tell me what causes the following error.
I have attached a copy of the mail which bounces to Postmaster.
Also, the following error msg 'MAISMT050E fsread#5 RC=001' appears
in the SMTP LOG file.
Thanks for any information provided.
-Rich
----------
Received: from DUVM.OCS.DREXEL.EDU by DUVM.OCS.DREXEL.EDU (Mailer R2.08 ptf039)
 with BSMTP id 7280; Mon, 25 Jan 93 14:19:19 EST
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 14:19:17 EST
From: Network Mailer <MAILER@DUVM.OCS.DREXEL.EDU>
To: VARENAS@DUVM
Subject: mail delivery error

Batch SMTP transaction log follows:

220 DUVM.OCS.DREXEL.EDU Columbia MAILER R2.08 ptf039 BSMTP service ready.
050 HELO DUVM
250 DUVM.OCS.DREXEL.EDU Hello DUVM
050 TICK 7277
250 7277 ... that's the ticket.
050 MAIL FROM:<MAILER@DUVM.OCS.DREXEL.EDU>
250 <MAILER@DUVM.OCS.DREXEL.EDU>... sender OK.
050 RCPT TO: <useri >
553 Mailbox syntax error.
050 RCPT TO: <xxxxxxx>
500 Command ignored due to a previous error.
050 RCPT TO: <xxxxxxx@DUNX1.OCS.DREXEL.EDU>
500 Command ignored due to a previous error.
050 DATA
354 Start mail input.  End with <crlf>.<crlf>
250 Mail accepted for delivery.
050 QUIT
221 DUVM.OCS.DREXEL.EDU Columbia MAILER BSMTP service done.

Original message follows:
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 16:49:41 CST
From:         "Mark R. Williamson" <MARK@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Mail forwarding Problem - SEND cmd??
              22 Jan 1993 17:02:57 EST from <Ratilal.R.Haria@NRC.CA>

COLOSPGS is a VAX/VMS system, so the "send" command he uses is the VMS
send command, which is more like the SENDFILE (or even PUNCH) command
on CMS.  The CMS (really CP) SEND command is unrelated to either.  (Try
HELP CP SEND for info.)

The fact that Q RDR shows RSCS as the ORIGINID confirms that his mail
is coming directly from RSCS to you without passing through MAILER.
(Otherwise ORIGINID would be MAILER or whatever your DVM name is.)

Mark R. Williamson, Rice U., Houston TX; MARK@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU or @RICEVM1
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xmailer
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 12:51:41 CST
From:         "Mark R. Williamson" <MARK@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Forwarding problem
              22 Jan 1993 11:08:47 EST from <Ratilal.R.Haria@NRC.CA>

Since COLOSPGS is defined with no mailer tag, it is probably sending mail
directly to the user's reader, bypassing MAILER entirely.  You can't
fault MAILER for not forwarding mail it never sees.

Should the file forwarding machine try to forward these mail files?
(I forget the latest status, but at one time it only forwarded to NJE
nodes?)  Are you using it?  Does the user have file forwarding active?

Mark R. Williamson, Rice U., Houston TX; MARK@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU or @RICEVM1
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"uigis-l@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.uigis-l
Date:         Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:44:00 PST
              List <UIGIS-L@UBVM.BITNET>
From:         CIS480220@AXE.HUMBOLDT.EDU
Subject:      subscription

Sub UIGIS_L   Scott Duncan Ramirez
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Date:         Wed, 27 Jan 93 12:04:00 EST
From:         Peter Parisi <PXP8@PSUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      scholarly authors as compositors?
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene

The NB list is, de facto, a group well-selected to discuss issues in
scholarly writing, editing and publication.  I wonder if I might impose
briefly on this extended definition of the list's interests.

In a nutshell the issue is this: are scholarly publishers imposing on the
publication capabilities that the computers and laser printers have placed
on many individal desktops by requiring authors to produce camera ready copy
and indexes?  In other words, are writers being asked to become to a large
extent publishers of themselves?

My question arises from the experience of a colleague, a philosopher, who
was asked to provide exactly those services for a reputable publishing
house.  He had wielded his word processor mightily to produce the
manuscript, but assembling the knowledge and hardware to provide page proofs
is, for him at least, a daunting task and a major time-consumer.  I also
wonder about routinely asking authors to be their own indexers.  Indexing is
its own art and when this skill is dispersed among the body of scholarly
writers I wonder whether quality won't suffer, at least in some cases.  And,
as we all know, the quality of an index can significanctlyaffect the
usefulness of a book.

I should add that the publishing house has very specific requirements about
typestyles and sizes and the way justification affects spacing within
words--all mysterious issues to my friend.  He is to send sample pages until
he gets it right.  My campus' computer facilities are mainframe oriented and
less well suited to advise on these matters than other institutions might
be.

Of course, it also seems clear, that for the publishing house this way of
proceeding effects some significant economies in a business none too
lucrative.  But at what cost in scholarly energy and quality of the
publication?

Have any of the NotaBenieri run into this situation?  Any views on its
propriety?  Or has NB made the whole business a snap?

Again, I apologize for imposing on this list, but I did not know a more
convenient venue to raise this issue.

Peter Parisi, Humanities, Penn State Harrisburg


Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Date:         Tue, 26 Jan 93 22:43:29 -0500
From:         "Drendel*John" <drendel@MIPS1.INFO.UQAM.CA>
Comments: To: notabene%taunivm.BITNET@vm1.mcgill.ca
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene

Does anyone out there know a good mail order distributer in the US for
Software Bridge?



John Drendel
Universite du Quebec a Montreal
From: g9026163@MCMAIL.CIS.MCMASTER.CA (Paul Caron)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene
Subject: Re: NB4.0 and Windows 3.1
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:32:51 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOTABENE@TAUNIVM.BITNET
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


On Mon, 25 Jan 1993, PETER JUST, ANTHROPOLOGY, WILLIAMS COLLEGE wrote:

> I have just upgraded to NB4.0, which I am trying to run under Windows 3.1
> Nota Bene ran fine at first, but when I set the symbol set to "ASCII and
> italics" the screen goes blank when I run it from Windows, though it's
> still fine when I run NB from DOS.  I deeply suspect there is something
> I should do to a .PIF file.  Any suggestions?
>
> Peter Just
> Anthropology, Williams College

I was able to duplicate the problem by first moving out of Lingua and
second using the /b- switch (I have to set the B switch because I've got a
Trident adapter).  I don't know that a PIF file would eliminate the
problem.  If you press <space>-<enter> while you've got your blank NB
screen, you'll see everything magically reappear in a window.  Fooling
around with various PIF settings (video display, etc.) didn't produce any
results either.  In short, the only so-called fix I could come up with was
either choosing another setting at the NB end, or, if you don't
mind special effects (like flashing menu letters), load NB with the /b
switch and choose any display setting you like.

Paul Caron                              G9026163@mcmail.cis.Mcmaster.CA
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ont.
CANADA
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene
From: akerr@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Austin Kerr)
Subject: Re: scholarly authors as compositors?
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 14:11:00 GMT

Peter's inquiry is appropriate.  Two experiences.  Houghton Miflin college 
division for my textbook wants ascii or wp files written according to precise 
instructions.  I viewed that process--that is, the precise instructions 
part--more of the publisher's task and not the authors' tasks.  My editor, 
without asking, agreed, and told me (us--Mansel Blackford is my co-author) not 
to worry about all of the details of A heads and B heads and the like; such was
the responsibility of the publisher.

I also work with Ohio State University Press as a series editor.  Costs are 
going out of sight, and former subsidies have disappeared.  Authors are not 
expected to produce camera ready copy, but I think there are some pretty strict
expectations, like only one space between a period and the next sentence.  As 
an old typist, I automatically put in two spaces, so that poses a problem for 
me.

Because of enormous costs of book publishing, and shrinking markets as a 
result, University presses would like to go to electronic publishing and 
publishing on demand, but are restrained from doing so, I am told by folks in 
the business around the coutnry, by the tenure system--that such books would 
not be viewed favorably by tenure committees.
-- 
K. Austin Kerr                    direct line to office 614-292-2613
Professor of History              department line           292-2674
Ohio State University             fax                       292-2282
Columbus, Ohio 43210 USA          e mail           kerr.6@osu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOTABENE@TAUNIVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOTABENE@TAUNIVM.BITNET"
Date:         Wed, 27 Jan 93 17:34:00 EST
From:         BOLTON@ZODIAC.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Multi-Lingual Scholar
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene

I reviewed this pgm in *Computers and the Humanities* in 1989, q.v.
Unless it has changed out of all recognition, it will disappoint most
NBers (spoiled lot).
Whitney Bolton
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene
From: akerr@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Austin Kerr)
Subject: Re: SLIP
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 16:14:57 GMT

I am also curious to learn about SLIP if the discussion isn't too "technical"

In article <9301222234.AA37904@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU> "M. Roy Harris" <mrh3
b@FARADAY.CLAS.VIRGINIA.EDU> writes:
>Is anyone on this list using SLIP (the Serial Line Internet
>Protocol) with a high-speed modem? If so, I would like to hear
>from you -- privately would probably be better since there may be
>no general interest in the subject.
>
>Roy Harris - University of Virginia
>mrh3b@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU, mrh3b@Virginia.Bitnet
-- 
K. Austin Kerr                    direct line to office 614-292-2613
Professor of History              department line           292-2674
Ohio State University             fax                       292-2282
Columbus, Ohio 43210 USA          e mail           kerr.6@osu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 93 08:26:30 EST
From:         "Gerald W. Schlabach" <GSCHLABA@IRISHVMA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: [DR DOS set up]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene
              22 Jan 93 12:02:56 GMT from <FP103@PHOENIX.CAMBRIDGE.AC.UK>

On Fri, 22 Jan 93 12:02:56 GMT <FP103@PHOENIX.CAMBRIDGE.AC.UK> said:
>It is actually possible to get 629Kb in DRDOS if you use either NDOS (which
>comes with Norton Utilities) or 4DOS as the command shell. I use NDOS but one
>could download 4DOS from
>SIMTEL20 where it has its own subdirectory . Include the following line in your
>CONFIG.SYS:
>
>Shell=(drive and path)NDOS.COM (drive and path) /U /P /E:512U
>
>This loads NDOS as a Replacement for COMMAND.COM. For various reasons its code
>leaves less code in conventional memory.

Very interesting.  I am a long-time user of Norton Utilities, and had
been running NDOS on my XT with MS-DOS 3.1.  I have been trying to get
advice (elsewhere) on whether NU is compatible with DR DOS.  Reason:
When I got my new computer I ran CALIBRATE to check out the hard drive,
and it promptly trashed it.  So I've been leery about other NU programs.
Getting 4 more K is not an obsession (really), but NDOS has some other
nice features, and NU has lots more.

If you have any more information about NU and DR DOS in/compatability,
please post.

Gerald W. Schlabach           |     Item bellum nullum argumentum est
Theology  U. of Notre Dame   |     pro veritate fidei Christianae.
Schlabach.1@nd.edu            |          --Francisco de Vitoria, 1539
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:      UK.AC.YORK.VAXB; 26 JAN 93 18:54:47 GMT
Date:         Tue, 26 Jan 93 18:55:00 GMT
From:         JAE2@VAXB.YORK.AC.UK
Subject:      RE: Ibid select & copy
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene

I forgot to mention the point about copying dat files.  I used copy
from the NB4 command line, and that set up some kind of indexing; I
didn't need to save or store.
(And later my troubles began... .)  But copy within really does work.
Judy Evans
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:      UK.AC.YORK.VAXB; 22 JAN 93 15:35:58 GMT
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 93 15:35:00 GMT
From:         JAE2@VAXB.YORK.AC.UK
Subject:      IBID problems, new
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene

I solved Orbis problems - I hope - using Mervyn's *start over* suggestion.
Then - no connection, I think - Ibid suddenly refused find anything, then found
 the dat files but nothing else, then author only.  Now it's doing what it
did to someone else on the list; Search will again find only author, not e.g.
key words.
I'm at the stage in writing a paper - & when I's done that, same for a book
- where I really need the search (and it would help with teaching, too).
I've tried copying the NB3 one over again, and using the last option under
generate, and so on.  Is there anything amazingly obvious I'm not doing?

Any help gratefully received!

PS, all of you who know Mervyn and read his 'grey' lament won't be
surprised to hear that he was telling me that in the South, they could
see an interesting round thing up above....
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
X-Nupop-Charset: English
Date:         Mon, 25 Jan 93 12:58:10 EST
From:         Rip Lhamon <wlhamon@GARNET.ACNS.FSU.EDU>
Subject:      enuff input
Comments: To: notabene%taunivm.BITNET@avm.cc.fsu.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene

Thanks to J-P Takala, Allan Needell, and Ken Salzberg for responding to my
evidently anomalous predicament.  Let's all go back to work on more
important matters, as Allan suggests we ought.
  Just for the record, the string that I devised is all that works for me,
and that just once.  J-P's just drops me out of the window, no matter where
the cursor was before I invoked his notesave.run.
  I do wish that the Technology Group would supply some tech support that
answered the phone.
Rip Lhamon
wlhamon@garnet.acns.fsu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:        UK.AC.EX.CEN; 25 JAN 93 18:26:29 GMT
X-Mailer:   ELM [version 2.3 PL0]
Date:         Mon, 25 Jan 93 18:26:52 GMT
From:         M.E.Bennun@CEN.EX.AC.UK
Subject:      Damaged Ibid.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene

I've broken something. Please fix it, mommy....

I added a lot of material to Ibid last night at home, increasing the
size of nbbib000.dat.  I then copied this file over the same file when
I came in to work this morning (as material had been added); and now I
can't find any of the material I added last night. Updating,
re-indexing, etc. does not help. It won't find entries later than the
ones on the original nbbib000.dat - that is, the one I took home to
work on and to extend. It was in fact larger than the one on my home
machine; so this morning I tried unsuccessfully to do at work what I
did quite successfully at home and without thinking twice about
it.......

At the same time, how does one then sensibly use Ibid between two
machines; and what files does one thus keep a backup of? And carry
between the machines?
 ------------

      /\   /----------------     /\
    /    \/                   \/     \
  /                                    \
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 Mervyn E. Bennun, Law Department, University of Exeter
 Phone: (+44) (0) 392 263 161
 Postal Address: Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, Devon, U.K.
 JANET: M.E.Bennun@uk.ac.exeter; Internet: M.E.Bennun@exeter.ac.uk
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Date:         Sun, 24 Jan 93 07:55:12 EST
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2
From:         Allan Needell <NASSH100@SIVM.SI.EDU>
Subject:      Re: :Note extract/reinsert:
Comments: To: Nota Bene List <NOTABENE@vm.tau.ac.il>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene

From: Allan Needell

Frederik,

I will certainly give your reinsert programs a workout. I look forward to
receiving them. Did you report this bug to NBI? If not I'll try just in case a
fix disk is actually in preparation.

Regards,
Allan A. Needell (NASSH100@SIVM.SI.EDU)
Dept. of Space History, National Air & Space Museum
Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560  (202/357-2828)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU