HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jagreath@eos.ncsu.edu (JOSEPH ALAN GREATHOUSE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: NCSU: COUNTDOWN TO ORANGE BOWL, THRASHES WAKE 42-24!!
Date: 23 Nov 92 05:54:57 GMT
Reply-To: jagreath@eos.ncsu.edu (JOSEPH ALAN GREATHOUSE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Originator: jagreath@c00100-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu


In article <1992Nov22.035445.29594@colorado.edu>, manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu) writes:
>In article <1992Nov22.005131.18955@ncsu.edu> delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE) writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  This has been a stellar day for all Wolfpack fans. After leading in the
>> game 35-0 at one point, Sheridan was nice, and put in our 2nd stringers...
>> Thsi means that an Orange Bowl bid is very possible with these factors:
>>>
>> 1. Miami beats Syracuse.. (done 16-10)
>> 2. Alabama loses to Auburn or Florida
>> 
>>
>> Then:
>>
>> Miami vs. Florida State, Sugar Bowl

>No way this matchup will take place... The SEC champ is an automatic
>choice for sugar bowl...

Correct.  Miami vs. FSU would be in the Fiesta Bowl

>> Texas A&M vs. Alabama, Cotton Bowl
>> Washington vs. Michigan, Rose Bowl
>> Nebraska vs. N.C. State, Orange Bowl

 And you could probably add Florida vs. Notre Dame in the Sugar Bowl

>Though it is very possible that Nebraska goes to OB, it is not yet
>guarenteed.. They have to win the last two games and one of them is
>against Oklahoma!

>Also, there are teams like Notre dame, USC, Stanford, Syracuse etc who might
>be looked ahead of ACC runner up NC State. These teams should bring in more
>fans than NC State.

He doesn't know Wolfpack fans very well, does he?

>>Very few teams want to say no to a $4.5 mil payoff!

>Also, ACC isn't strong enough for the second team to go to OB!

Sorry to bust your bubble here, but the ACC and PAC-10 are the 2 strongest
conferences in division I-A football.  The only conference with a higher non-
conference winning percentage than the ACC is the PAC-10, and that one is 
*very* close.  The second place team in the ACC is probably much *MORE* 
deserving of a Tier 1 Bowl bid than, say, the second place Big 8 or Big East
teams.

>>delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu

>Njan

-- 
**************************************************************************
*                                                                        *
*  Joseph A. Greathouse            *  All opinions are solely mine.      *  
*  Theta Chi Fraternity            *  A non-hazing, leadership-oriented  *
*  Delta Rho Chapter               *  organization, promoting Alma Mater *
*  North Carolina State University *  and the concept of a Helping Hand. *
*  Final Score:  Wolfpack 31 - Wahoos 7  Go Pack!!!!                     *
**************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kennedy@asuvax.eas.asu.edu (Ralph Kennedy)
Subject: Re: Stanford Bowl-bound
Organization: Arizona State Univ, Tempe
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 16:55:55 GMT

dbrown@newssun.med.miami.edu (Daniel Brown) writes:
> Stanford has had a good first year under Bill Walsh and will
> obviously go to a bowl.  If the beat Cal this weekend (very
> likely), they would end up 8 - 3, with loses to Washington, 
> Arizona, and Texas A&M (all very good teams), and probably 
> be ranked in the top 12 (is that stretching it?).  I read a 
> post that suggested that they might get an invite from the 
> Orange Bowl ... is that really possible?  What is the most
> likely bowl match-up for them?

     Latest rumors in Tempe have Syracuse matched
up with Colorado or Stanford.  If Stanford beats
Cal, they would be preferred over USC even if USC
is higher in the rankings (should the Fiesta indeed
decide to go the Pac-10 route).

     So the Fiesta Bowl is definitely one of Stanford's
possibilities.

--Ralph Kennedy      {ames,gatech,husc6,rutgers}!ncar!noao!asuvax!kennedy
                        {allegra,decvax,ihnp4,oddjob}--^
                                          ^---------------The Wrong Choice
                             internet: kennedy@asuvax.asu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Does Hearst's Uncle Work For ESPN?
From: rcf@netlink.cts.com (Bob Forsythe)
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 05:41:00 PST
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA

Honestly, I don't know what ya have to do.  Faulk runs for 300 yards and 
4 T.D.'s, including the longest of his career against a good (if not 
great) run defense (48 in the nation), and ESPN *still* hypes Garrison 
Hearst for the Heisman, despite his having done little recently.  On 
Sunday they offer his "versatility" by showing a touchdown on a pass, and 
then show stats saying that nobody from a team ranked #1 and only 2 from 
unranked teams have ever won the award, then conclude that Hearst is in 
good position to win.  I mean really, folks, this guy couldn't carry 
Faulk's laundry.  He runs in a two-back, run oriented offense while 
Marshall runs in a one-back pass oriented offense.  There's just no 
comparison.  Too bad ESPN can't figure that out!

-Bob

--                    
INTERNET:  rcf@netlink.cts.com (Bob Forsythe)
UUCP:   ...!ryptyde!netlink!rcf
NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115
From: ttsai@crhc.uiuc.edu (Timothy Tsai)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Excessive Celebration Penalty
Date: 16 Nov 1992 14:25:06 -0600
Organization: Center for Reliable and High-Performance Computing, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
NNTP-Posting-Host: haydn.crhc.uiuc.edu

killer@robin.cs.hut.fi (Kalle Kivimaa) writes:

>In <1e52ibINNk7c@haydn.crhc.uiuc.edu> ttsai@crhc.uiuc.edu (Timothy Tsai) writes:

>>the penalty was on the conversion, would the yards be marked off on the
>>conversion or the kickoff?

>Penalties on touchdown plays and conversions:

>If a defensive foul is committed during a play that ends in a touchdown,
>the offended team may choose to enforce the penalty on the PAT or on
>the kickoff.

>If a defensive foul is committed during a succesful PAT the penalty
>is enforced on the kickoff.

But what happens with an offensive penalty?  If an excessive penalty had been
called on Notre Dame on the touchdown, would yards have been marked off on the
conversion or the kickoff?
-- 
Timothy Tsai              Celtics Rule!!!
ttsai@uiuc.edu            Let's go Mets!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: PAC-10 has the best non-conference record in the nation.
Organization: University of Michigan
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 15:46:41 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.053453.1682@u.washington.edu> baze@carson.u.washington.edu (Behzad Khamneian) writes:

     The title says it all.  The PAC-10 went 22-7-1 (.751) against non-conference
   opponents.  This is the best among all the college football conferences in the
   nation...

   PAC-10 is simply the best!!

   -Behzad

Clearly, based on your previous post, you are smart enough to realize that
paragraph 1, while true, does not imply paragraph 2.  So why would you try
and suggest that it does, Behzad?

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
From: n9041679@henson.cc.wwu.edu (brian h. harper)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Can you believe it? Too bad, Rose Bowl fans ...
Date: 22 Nov 92 08:45:09 GMT
Article-I.D.: henson.1992Nov22.084509.19571
Organization: Western Washington University

gsroka@leland.Stanford.EDU (Gregory Sroka) writes:

>It's still only the third quarter, 
>but Wash. St. is beating U. Wash. 35-7 !!

>If WSU holds up, this and Michigan's third tie (ha) 
>means that once again, the Rose Bowl has no impact on the MNC.

What do you mean "once again"? Last year it was one of two games that
determined the two national champions. I'd call that an impact. This years
match-up will not, but should still prove an exciting match-up.

>Rob wont have to worry about Michigan being ahead of ND in the
>polls anymore. In fact ND ought to jump up at least two places, while
>being idle!  :-)

>The coalition may just work yet ...
>Go Auburn and Texas on Thanksgiving day!!

The coalition may help the sportswriters and coaches, but until there's a
playoff, there will not be a true champion.

-Brian Harper


>-
>Greg Sroka
>Menlo Park, CA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: pdunn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick L Dunn)
Subject: I-AA Report for Nov. 21 (2/3): I-AA Top 20
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:47:01 GMT

                        I-AA Top 20 for this week:

                        Pts   Was  Last Week's Game       This Week's Game

1t.  The Citadel (9-1)   78     2  d VMI 50-0              at Furman (6-4)
1t.  NE Louisiana (8-2)  78     1  d SF Austin 41-22       at N. Texas (4-6)
3.   N. Iowa (9-1)       72     4  d W. Illinois 37-6      SW Missouri (6-4)
4.   Middle Tenn (8-2)   68     5  d Morehead St 70-0      Tenn Tech (7-3)
5.   Idaho (8-2)         64     6  d Montana St 28-7       at Boise St (5-5)
6.   Marshall (7-3)      54.5  10  d Tenn Tech 52-14       at E. Tenn St (5-5)
7t.  Villanova (8-2)     53     9  d Fordham 31-14         Maine (5-4)
7t.  Y'st'wn St (7-2-1)  53     7  t Akron 10-10           20t Ga. So. (7-3)
9.   Samford (8-2)       50.5  12  d Tenn-Martin 42-25     C. Florida (6-3)
10.  Delaware (8-2)      49     3  l to Richmond 29-21     Towson St (5-4)
11.  McNeese St (7-3)    40    13  d Sam Houston 37-14     at Weber St (6-4)
12.  E. Kentucky (8-2)   36    15  d Austin Peay 45-14     at Morehead St (3-7)
13.  Wm & Mary (8-2)     30   t17  d Lehigh 26-13          at 19 Richmond (7-3)
14t. E. Wash. (7-3)      27   t20  d Boise St 14-13        Idle
14t. Florida A&M (7-3)   27     8  l to Grambling 27-10    Idle
16.  W. Carolina (7-3)   16    NR  d E. Tenn St 41-12      at 18 App St  (6-4)
17.  Princeton (8-1)     11.5 t20  d Yale 36-7             Dartmouth (7-2)
18.  Appalach'n St (6-4) 11    NR  d N Car A&T 42-6        16 W Carolina (7-3)
19.  Richmond (7-3)      10    NR  d Delaware 29-21        13 Wm&Mary (8-2)
20t. Georgia So (7-3)     5.5  14  l to Troy St 21-0       at 7t Y'st'wn(7-2-1
20t. Massachusetts (7-2)  5.5  16  l to Maine 21-13        at New Hamp (4-5-1)

Dropped Out: Western Illinois, N. Car. A&T, SW Missouri St.

PDunn
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: More Auburn - Alabama predictions
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 12:42:19 GMT

In article <dkm2.722061763@Isis.MsState.Edu>, dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K. Magee) writes:
> I just ran into Elvis Presley at Burger King and he told me that Bear Bryant 
> was going to be at this year's Auburn - Alabama game.  I know that the woof
> gods do not consider this a game, but merely a waste of Alabama's time.  But
> since my reliable source has given this precious information, we should all
> watch TV and see if we can locate him.
> 
> If this is a lie, at least we can still see Palmer run by like a tornado,
> the AU offense gunned down, etc.

Bear will be working with the officiating crew.  This will be his second
game of the year as an official, his first was last week's Auburn-Georgia
game.....

-- 
David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@accs.duc.auburn.edu
From: nichols@spss.com (David Nichols)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Roll Tide down the Polls!
Date: 17 Nov 92 00:09:22 GMT
Organization: SPSS Inc.

In article <dkm2.721803415@Isis.MsState.Edu> dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K. Magee) writes:
>
>You saw it on ESPN.  Mississippi State may have lost, but did get 301 yards 
>on the former #1 defense in the nation.  The tide won on luck, and lost
>3 defensive players, so Auburn should have an advantage. 
>
>I do believe John James took care of Mr. Curry, and MSU showed bama what 
>an offensive line is all about.
>
>TAMU to #2  !!!!

Luck? I don't think so. Though I was surprised by how well Mississippi
State played in the 3rd quarter--they did have Alabama on the ropes for
a while--Alabama took it over again in the 4th quarter and had things
well in hand.

Alabama's defense is still number one, both in points allowed and in
total yardage. 

--
 David Nichols        Senior Statistical Support Specialist         SPSS, Inc.
 Phone: (312) 329-3684     Internet:  nichols@spss.com     Fax: (312) 329-3657
*******************************************************************************
 Any correlation between my views and those of SPSS is strictly due to chance.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: Michigan:  The Great Paper Tiger
Organization: University of Michigan
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:50:43 GMT

In article <BxqLsy.I41@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> gtao@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Greg ) writes:

   * Grbac --- For the day, he was 21 of 29 for 278 yards.  He also had a 
	       touchdown, BUT he threw 2 interceptions to an UNRANKED opponent.
	       For all the ranting and raving about the kid, he is nowhere as
	       good a quarterback as Illinois' Verduzco, who was the Big 10's
	       leading passer last season, but has only recently been given the go-
	       ahead to pass by the often dimwitted Illinois Offensive Coorinator, 
	       Beck. Oh well, Elvis is just like any other QB that ever came out of
	       Michigan:  his passes have the trajectory of SCUD missiles.

I guess you didn't see the tipped interceptions.  Wasn't from Elvis, guy.
Furthermore, unless I'm mistaken, Elvis was the Big 10's leading passer last
year.  I *know* that he was the nations leading passer, but perhaps Jason
snuck up after excluding the out of conference games.  Q: wanna bet on who
gets drafted higher?


   * Michigan's version of --- A sound idea if executed well, but it proved 
     the "no huddle"           completely ineffective for Michigan when they had
			       the correct number of people on the field.

The stats don't bear this out.  The michigan O walked the Illini D.  The no
huddle worked flawlessly, except for the last drive where the Illini D blitz
was called.  Most of the Michigan skill players dropped the ball, but the
offense was moving a ton on your D.

   History WILL repeat itself!  Expect Michigan to be embarrased AGAIN in the
   Rose Bowl. Thank God that Michigan has no UNdeserving Hiesman candidate this
   year. 

Ouch.  Not a little bitter about the past, are you?  You tied.  Just how
overbearing would you be if your team had won?  Was it Erickson who told one
of the Miami recievers, after celebrating a TD, "next time act like you've
been there before"?  You might want to take some advice from the wise coach
of our defending national champions.

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer)
Subject: Re: Iowa has lost to Minnesota!
Organization: Washington State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 92 20:18:28 GMT

In article <1eoflcINN4rq@bredbeddle.cs.purdue.edu> sjc@cs.purdue.edu (Steve Chapin) writes:
>}} In article <1992Nov22.033612.25585@serval.net.wsu.edu> jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer) writes:
>}} 
>}} Just gives me a warm feeling all over to see those Copper
>}} Bowl people lose their favorite Big-10 pet.
>
>Believe you me, many of us Big 10 fans are no more happy about the
>blatant favoritism than you are.  Purdue did the right thing and kept
>IU from being considered for a bowl, and Minnesota and Northwestern
>did their parts.  Unfortunately, MSU/UI avoided a tie, so one team
>with a pitiful record is going to go.
>
>Now I'm hearing the Pac-10 weenies clamoring for *their* 6-5 teams to
>go to bowls.  Puh-leeze!  What's good for the goose is good for the
>gander, and if 6-5 Big 10 teams don't deserve to go (and they don't),
>6-5 Pac 10 teams don't deserve to go.

Not all of us are crying for our 6-5 teams to go.  I agree with you that
our 6-5 teams shouldn't be going to a bowl (although I will say that our
6-5ish teams are better than your 6-5ish teams).  But you are right... I
don't think any 6-5 team should be going to a bowl.  And as I said before,
the claim that UCLA should go to a bowl is ridiculous, even after the 
upset of USC.  All I am concerned about is that WSU (now 8-3, 5-3) doesn't
get left without a bowl.  There are five PAC-10 teams that obviously
deserve to go to bowls:

UW
Stanford
USC
WSU
UA

We might know more by the end of the day.

Jim
-- 
Jim Jungbauer                 |  Go Vikings, Northstars, Cougars!
jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu    | 
EECS Department               |  "Nice move by Bellows... big drive... SCORES!"
Washington State University   |     -- Mike Emrick, 1991 Norris Division Finals
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: lein@cat.uucp (John Leinaweaver)
Subject: Re: Small college in Penn
Organization: Bellcore, Piscataway NJ
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 16:58:25 GMT

In article <4157@ncrsoph.Sophia.NCR.COM> sstasuke@ncrsoph.Sophia.NCR.COM (Steve Stasukewicz) writes:
>
>A while back somebody posted an artcile about a college named Slippery
>Rock.  Does anyone know if there is a team in the same conference that
>starts with the letters "Shippen...." Can't remember the exact name. 
>It's a small college in Pennsylvania.  Also, does anyone have the 
>standings for that conference that they could post or email to me?
>
>Thnks a bunch.
>
>Steve
>

It's Shipensburg!  They, along with other teams such as Millersville,
Mansville, Edinboro, Kutztown (Andre Reed's school), Cheyney, Loch Haven,
Indiana (PA), California (PA), East Stroadsburg, and a couple more that
slip my mind all play in the Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference (Div II).

Unfortunely the papers here in Joisey don't show division II standings for
out of state schools.


Also, back in the early 80's Shippsburg and Slippery Rock played a game
at Michigan Stadium (didn't fill the 106,xxx seats though).  Apparently
some of the locals in Michigan were fond of the name "Slippery Rock".

Maybe someone from Michigan could fill in on the details of that game.


John L
From: "al sorhaindo" <al.sorhaindo@execnet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: 1 2 feel good about
Date: 16 Nov 92 02:12:31 EST
Reply-To: "al sorhaindo" <al.sorhaindo@execnet.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Executive Networks Information

When Bill Dooley announced this would be his last season it seemed
sure that he would go out on a sour note.

Wake Forest had not been good in recent years (3-8 last year), and an
increasingly difficult ACC schedule didn't look to offer any solace.


But...a 1-3 start, with the three losses actually being routs has
been the harbinger of SIX STRAIGHT WINS!


Congratulations to Wake Forest and Bill Dooley for accomplishing a
great reversal in fortune. 
---
  DeLuxe 1.21 #11688  
--
Executive Network Information System  (914) 667-4567
International ILink Host
From: JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: FSU's uniforms
Date: 17 Nov 92 14:25:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: psuvm.92322.092557JCT3
Organization: Penn State University

ESPN mentioned that Burt Reynolds gave the new uniforms to
the team.  And yes, the gold pants look MUCH better.

Jim Thomas
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: marko@IMD.Sterling.COM (Mark Olson)
Subject: Re: Down to Business (OU/NU)
Organization: Sterling Software, IMD
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:04:35 GMT
X-Md4-Signature: 9b5cbbdb9545832b5b0af6a313c2fc31

In article <1992Nov19.010449.16788@colorado.edu> manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu) writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.145226.7287@sparky.imd.sterling.com> marko@IMD.Sterling.COM (Mark Olson) writes:
>>What class are Steve Collins and Cale Gundy in (Fr, So, etc.)?  Also, Whatever
>>happened to some of the great OU QB's, Jamelle Hollieway for instance?  Who was
>>the QB in the seventies who wore the bandana under his helmet (kind of his
>>trademark).  I read or heard somewhere that Charles Thompson was playing for a
>>JUCO team somewhere.  The OU QB's were always memorable because they were just
>>so damned good.  I can remember many games where they would spring a long one
>>and, seemingly, would be in the grasp of the defensive back, only to pitch to
>>the trailing halfback who would pop for more yards and usually a score.
>
>Memories of good old days, eh? Too bad college football changed so much..
>Now most teams play defense!!!
>

Most teams did back ~then~ too.  Jamelle Hollieway, however, was an outstanding
Quarterback and made a lot of great defenses look pretty bad.

>>Mark Olson  || marko@IMD.Sterling.COM -or- uunet!sparky!marko
>
>Njan
-- 
Mark Olson  || marko@IMD.Sterling.COM -or- uunet!sparky!marko
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: OSU beats Michigan: 13-13
Organization: University of Michigan
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 15:39:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov22.022704.5756@desire.wright.edu> demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man) writes:

	   Once again OSU dominates a team but doesn't come away with a win.  At
   least it's not a loss :\.

Michigan has 3 ties.  My own, slightly biased view of them went like this: ND
could have gone either way and nobody can gribe, Ill was outplayed by
michigan but UM destroyed themselves and Ill played a terifficly solid game
to take advantage of it.  But OSU was the best team on the field in tie #3.
Not by a lot, I thought the game was almost as close as the score.  But those
southern boys should have won.

	   Herbstreit: Peak of his game.  28-43 for 271 yards and a TD.  2nd best
   passing numbers in OSU history.  All those who proclaimed Herbstreit a mediocre
   QB please form a line to the right for pennance :).

Herbstreit's scrambling was amazing, and I'm convinced that was the
difference in the game.  On a few occasions we got guys deep in the backfield
but he almost always got away.


Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: atchison@wogglebug.cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark Atchison)
Subject: Re: OSU beats Michigan: 13-13
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 17:33:11 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.150630.24448@bnr.ca> lowery@bnr.ca (Gary Lowery) writes:
>In article <1ep67cINN9db@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> lpc4@po.CWRU.Edu (Lawrence P. Colucci) writes:
>B.S. deleted
>
>Hey OSU fans,  hype it up all you want, you still haven't beaten Michigan
>in 5 tries.  That's right 0-4-1.  When was your last Rose bowl appearance?
>You guys choke every year.  Next year it is in Ann Arbor.  We will win that
>one also.  Can your coach.  He's out of there.  OSU still sucks! Get back
>down to earth.  A tie still means MICHIGAN is unbeaten in its last 5 games
>against OSU.  The streak goes on......
>
>GO BLUE

Funny, none of the Michigan players seemed quite this exuberant about the tie.

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________________
 Mark Atchison, a.k.a. <atchison@cis.ohio-state.edu>; Graduate Student in the
Computer Science Dept, THE Ohio State University (NOT an Ohio State University)
		Any plagiarisms seen above are not my own...