HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: STEVE FRANKLIN STRIKES OUT!
Date: 17 Aug 92 03:34:00 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame,misc.test
Organization: TSAKC-TC

In article <BsuHnn.582@cs.dal.ca>
        franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (<<<***Steve Franklin***>>>) writes:

]   You always fantasize about other men sucking on body parts? My, you
]are a repressed one now aren't you?

Um, uh, please tuck away your metronome, Steve.  Repressed people are
those who refuse to realize their fantasies.  Sometimes they
unconsciously project their fantasies onto the net, however.


--
Barry Schwartz        trashman@crud.mn.org
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney)
Subject: Will you stop calling me your family names? (was Re: STEVE CHANEY IS A FUCKWAD
Organization: California State University: Sacramento
Distribution: world 
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 16:30:33 GMT

In article <1b80731b.ARN22e4@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au> munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac writes:

I advise you to cease and desist your "fuckwad" post.

You are trying to label me as a member of your family by doing so, and
I am in no way related to you. 

===============================================================================
			Robert Casey for President '96! 
			 This Casey never strikes out.
===============================================================================
===============================================================================
BBBBBB     OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    Founder: Steve Chaney 
B    B     O      O   S         S          <chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu> 
BBBBBBBB   O     OO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    
BB     B   O     OO        SS        SS    Borg Operating 
BBBBBBBB O OOOOOOOO O SSSSSSS O SSSSSSS O  Space Systems, Revision 2.0 

	       The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS. 

Alias Borgie Boy, the BorgBarian, Inturdgent, Propeller Boy, and other
scornful names heaped upon me during my lifetime...
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com (PuterDude)
Subject: Re: OGGLEs in my mailbox...
Organization: None, today. Thank you.
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1992 20:21:34 GMT

 bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) labs out...

>I come here when I have the time to.

And when the right hand has time, also.

-- 
Puter	puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com	.sig by Generic Labels
(Put irritating title here)		(Put phone # here.)
(Put obnoxious quote here. Please make it as long as possible.)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 17:24:46 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In  <1992Aug12.020846.7594@cfctech.cfc.com>  kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy) writes:
> In article <1992Aug10.031935.11328@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes
> >
> >Sorry, you're correct - I thought it was a different thread.  Nevertheless,
> >my two points remain valid.  (1) the subject of child sexual abuse was *not*
> >broached by Ms. Garvin.  (It was broached, as you corrected me, by Chaney.)
>
> As already pointed out, his .sig referred to concensual adult/child sex, not
> rape.

"adult/child sex" is statutory rape.

> >(2) Don's comment was in response to the stupid and insensitive comment
> >by Suzanne Forgach.
>
> Larry, there's a big difference between discussing such matters in detached,
> abstract generalities, on the one hand (as Suzanne was doing),

No, she wasn't discussing child sexual abuse at all, she was discussing
rolling a condom onto a cucumber in class.  By attempting to equate this
with child sexual abuse, she was *trivializing* child sexual abuse.

> [big difference between] ... and admitting
> "I was raped" on the other. I still maintain that Don was the first to truly
> hammer the issue home in talk.abortion.

(Which is different from your original claim.)  I can accept this.  And I
will maintain that if some insensitive idiot claims that getting a
cucumber ready for "safe salad" :-) constitutes sexual abuse, then the
issue *needed* to be hammered home.

> And I also maintain that the wording of his post was ambiguous

I agree; I had to reread it to realize that it couldn't possibly be
what you assumed it to be.

> and the braggy, confrontational tone was HIGHLY
> unusual for a revelation so intimate and personal.

Why should he be apologetic for something he wasn't responsible for?

> Why does this flamewar need to rage on and on?

Why do any of them?  :-(

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: ricegm@ecf.toronto.edu (George Matthew Rice)
Subject: Re: All this recent discussion
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 20:32:45 GMT

In article <26727@life.ai.mit.edu> daz@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (David A. Z.) writes:
>launce@apollo.med.utah.edu (Tri-Ungulate) 17 Aug 92 21:01:47 GMT, writes:
>In article <26610@life.ai.mit.edu> daz@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (David A. Z.) writes:
>> Holee nookie Batman, this "David A.Z." is sure one heckuva stud!!!
>> Gee, he's sooo qool, I mean, like, he posts to alt.evil & stuff and
>> says that he has slept with a statistically significant cohort of
>> women!!!  
>
>        Funny, I don't remember having said that I've slept with a 
>statistically significant cohort of women.  I only said that if the
>original poster had slept with asian women he'd relize they were tighter,

Oooohhhhhh you just stepped in it there buddy. I have slept with asian
women. In fact my current wife happens to be asian. For hard facts, I 
can prove that I slept with her because I am expecting a child in a month.
And I am afraid that I still haven't realized that they are tighter.

>but I did not give any specific source of data on this.  In fact, my
>mention of "on the vast average" infers that this came from a source
>broader than my personal experience.
>
Broader than your personal experience... hmmm. That doesn't say much
but I'm willing to take a stab at it. Was it your older brother?
How about some specific sources to back this up. Come on, puh-leeeezzzzee
just one. 

>
>        I was the one who was arguing AGAINST blanket assertions.  Ie:
>Asain women aren't _really_ just the same as other women since they are
>much tighter on the vast average than other women.
>

Nope. Don't see no blanket assertions here. Nope. Nope. Duuhh.
Can't say as ah do. Nope. Nope. Well, ah gotta go check mah
still. Keep up the vigilance. Yepp. Yepp. Great work. Duuuhhh.
Keep it up. Yepp yepp . Keep it up.

Matthew
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12101 talk.abortion:31892
From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: emotional problems? or worse?
Date: 16 Aug 92 00:15:57 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise

franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (<<<***Steve Franklin***>>>)
writes to lefty:

-> ..you're right Lefty. I'm ashamed. You're an interesting
-> fellow and I admit it. 
[...]

-> My, you are one interesting fellow aren't you? 

[...]

-> You're like a bad case of halitosis. You're okay
-> until you speak. Then everyone notices how bad you
-> really are.

having trouble focusing, stevie?

-- 
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12167 talk.abortion:32275
From: dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: hitting on dac?
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 92 11:27:35 GMT
Reply-To: munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac
FollowUp-To: alt.flame,talk.abortion
 <1992Aug17.163033.29260@csus.edu> <1992Aug17.193006.19219@crd.ge.com>
Keywords: 
Organization: More like Dis~, really.

In article <1992Aug17.193006.19219@crd.ge.com>, James G Keegan Jr writes:

> the hallchaney thing posting as
> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes to dac:
> -> I advise you to cease and desist your "fuckwad" post.
> -> 
> 
> i think one of the little fellows likes you dac. it
> looks like he's pulling your pigtails hoping you'll
> notice him.

I noticed. He don't 'alf pong with the reek of self-satisfaction.
Clot that he obviously is!

> which one do you prefer, dac, the hall thing, or the
> chaney thing?

They're all the same to me, James - newbies piled on newbies.
Endless streams of snot-nosed little inconsequential gits,
looking for action, and spewing crap.

Will you ever tire of egging on Darcy?

Dac
--
munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac      David Andrew Clayton.           // _| _  _
  prolix!dac%eyrie@labtam.oz.au      Canberra, Australia           \X/ (_](_](_
        dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au      I post .
prolix!dac@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au            . . I am.             +61 6 290 2215
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12252 talk.abortion:33006
From: launce@apollo.med.utah.edu (Tri-Ungulate)
Subject: Re: STEPHEN CHANEY SUCKS UP!!!!
Organization: Trifurcate-Hooved Ruminant Surveyors, Inc.
	<BsuHnn.582@cs.dal.ca> <1992Aug12.223904.3027@csus.edu>
Distribution: world 
Date: 13 Aug 92 10:31:50

[A mildly interesting piece of obsequious flattery by one whose
marginal mental capacites are exceeded only by his object of idolatry
deleted]

Too bad he didn't die laughing...

--non-mu
From: danoc@earlybird.Eng.Sun.COM (Dan O'Connell [CONTRACTOR])
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Racist Tripe
Date: 12 Aug 1992 18:40:54 GMT
Organization: Experienced Men, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: earlybird

 (Keith C. Estanol) writes:
  
  Anyway, for those of you who _have_ dated asian girls, I think you'd
  know that they are not all that different from anyone else. Really.

(David A. Z.) fantasizes:

 And if you had SLEPT with asian girls (in addition to girls of
 other races) you'd KNOW that they are MUCH TIGHTER than other women on

You shouldn't believe everything you read. . . .

Dano
From: trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: The world according to propeller-boy - part 1
Date: 16 Aug 92 11:45:00 GMT
Organization: TSAKC-TC

In article <1992Aug8.211011.6413@rotag.mi.org>
        kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:

]In article <92216.223041ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> Linda Birmingham <ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> writes:
]>btw your keyborad is broken.  
]          ^^^^^^^^
]SOMEONE'S keyboard is broken, that's for sure...

No, that's your "keyborad", Kebbie.  A keyborad is the group formed
by another group's keybo and rad.  The keybo is the group of empty
space between a group of ears, and a rad is a group of things that
come after "yc" in a word puzzle.


--
Barry Schwartz        trashman@crud.mn.org
Xref: sparky alt.flame:11991 talk.abortion:31308
From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: about apologies and character
Date: 12 Aug 92 12:22:11 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise

long after he made his so-called apology,
kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:

-> Susie and her S.O. are guilty on all 3 counts.

while in a related thread, he whines about why this has
gone on for so long.

imo, blaming the victim implies a more serious disorder
than does the origina, sick attack.

-- 
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
From: levin@bbn.com (Joel B Levin)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K. Cochran & homophobia
Keywords: homophobe, homophobia, Keith Cochran
Date: 21 Aug 92 15:50:23 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

stu5s14@bcrka287.bnr.ca (James Cherry) writes:
|Keith,
 . . .
|Kevin Darcy then responded in <1992Aug14.070559.4635@rotag.mi.org>:

|>Then why do you spew homophobic shit that ranks with the Artimus Pages and
|>Phil Stromers and Danny Karneses of the world?

|To which you submitted article <1992Aug21.003643.3975@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>:

|>I love it.  I make a half-assed description of anal sex, Kevin calls me a
|>homophobe, and rather then admitting his mistake attempts to equate me with
|>Artimus, Phil, and Danny.

|   I submit that it is ENTIRELY REASONABLE from your posts to accuse you of
|being homophobic, as Kevin Darcy contended, because:

(Many lines of pseudological (actually darcylogical) logorrhea removed.)

|I didn't see the whole of the original post which your second quotation
|above comes from, so it may be out of context.

No kidding.

If you had taken your time and looked around instead of jumping in
feet first with your eyes shut, you might have known something about
Keith so you might understand that he is not a homophobe.

Here's an additional clue: the references to anal sex are intended for
homophobes like kevin whose sphincters tighten in terror at the
thought of anything remotely like a penis being inserted into their
own anal passages, or who fear even the remotest possibility that they
might want such a thing.

Keith as a self-hating homosexual, indeed.  HAH!
From: hays@ssd.intel.com (Kirk Hays)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: democratic platform
Date: 17 Aug 92 19:27:18 GMT
Organization: Intel Supercomputer Systems Division

In article <1992Aug14.234050.17419@cfctech.cfc.com>, kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy) writes:
|> In article <1992Aug13.220118.14275@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman) writes:
|> >
|> > [...]
|> >
|> >ps - My use of last names is neither inappropriate nor hostile.
|> 
|> Your continued use of Mr. Ezekiel's last name, in the manner he himself has 
|> characterized as "rude", is both inappropriate AND hostile.

Darcy's followup, from one of the rudest, crudest people on the net, is
inappropriate, hostile, and hypocritical.

Or don't you remember Susan Garvin, Darcy?

-- 
Kirk Hays - NRA Life.
Start your day with a little civil disobedience.  Call BATF at 1-800-ATF-GUNS or
1-800-RUN-GUNS, tell them what you think of gun grabbers and government employees
that encourage people to narc on their neighbors.  Good for the soul.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12141 talk.bizarre:26358
From: bc@Apple.COM (bill coderre)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: The wages of Stupidity are Death
Date: 17 Aug 92 21:00:54 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA

Dominus, man among men:
|    Whether I smoke or not is irrelevant, Strachenpudlich.  There is, in
|fact, only minimal health risk associated with moderate tobacco use.  It
|is certainly less dangerous than, say, living in West Philadelphia,
|which I do constantly, and yet which no sanctimonious net.assholes see
|fit to berate me about.

I wish to withdraw my flame of mathew@mantis on the grounds that it
embarasses me with how pathetic it is by comparison to Dominus'.

And also, I pledge to smoke a cig with cj and dominus and sho and
andyr at our next convenience, specifically to piss off all the
wheenie whiners that insist upon fascism as the only way to improve my
health.

mr HEINOUS
but you better keep those fucking clove things outta my sight or I'll
make you eat them. Cloves are for hams.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12080 alt.sex:26665 alt.personals:17441
From: setzer@math.ncsu.edu (William Setzer)
Subject: Re: Will you stop calling me your family names?
X-Mr-Attribution: Dave Hill
Organization: The Chebychev Church of Probability
	<1b80731b.ARN22e4@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au>
	<1992Aug17.163033.29260@csus.edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 17:31:39 GMT

chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
: I advise you to cease and desist your "fuckwad" post.
: 
: You are trying to label me as a member of your family by doing so, and
: I am in no way related to you. 

	*HONK*		*HONK*	*Honk*
		 *HONK* 
			neener neener neener

		*Honk* *HONK* *HONK*		*HONK*
		 	  *HONK* 
	*HONK*	I know you are but what am I? *Honk*

	  *HONK* *HoNK*		*HONK*
	    *Honk*		*HOnk*
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 16:00:12 GMT

In article <BssJwv.3Kx@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM> jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods) writes:
>In article <1992Aug6.015014.26794@cfctech.cfc.com>
>        kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin "The Wonder Badger" Darcy) writes:
>]Look, Linda, it's pretty damn rare on Usenet for anyone to be saying
>]"I can tell you all about <X>", where <X> is some taboo and/or hyper-
>]sensitive subject. Given that it's rare, one must choose between two 
>]unlikely possibilities:
>]	A) The poster is a victim, and for some reason mistakes Usenet
>]	   for a caring, sensitive place to share their painful secret
>]		or
>]	B) The poster is a perpetrator bragging about their exploits, and
>]	   stupid enough to not know they will get flamed to a cinder for
>]	   doing so.
>]How does one tell the difference? Well, we look for cues in the context. If
>]the tone is sensitive and compassionate and low-key, then it's probably (A), 
>]but if it's braggy and confrontational, we go with (B).
>
>So, using the newly-revealed secret of DarcyVision(R), I finally know how to
>interpret the bumper sticker on a car in this neighborhood which reads
>"Someone I love was murdered."  

Bumper stickers are typically printed in bulk, not just singly, so there is a
presumption that anything seen on a bumper sticker is some sort of political
or social statement, rather than a personal revelation. Your analogy sucks.

> [goes on to conclude that the owner of the car is admitting to murder]

If the vehicle-owner loved the victim, why would they murder them? This 
_prima facie_ logical inconsistency tends to weigh against the conclusion 
that the vehicle-owner is admitting to murder (in addition to the obvious
question of what the vehicle-owner has to gain by openly admitting to murder).

Try again, Johnny?

								- Kevin
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 06:25:01 GMT

In article <1992Aug10.162419.258471@cs.cmu.edu> jch+@cs.cmu.edu (Jonathan Hardwick) writes:
>kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes
>> I have still yet to hear any kind of credible rationale as to how someone can 
>> get "hurt" by the obviously-mistaken statement of a complete stranger: if 
>> someone walked up to you in the street and said "Hey! You're Bobby Hatchett
>> the notorious axe-murderer!", would you be "hurt" by that, assuming no-one
>> actually believed him, and he admitted his error as soon as it was pointed
>> out to him? Doesn't sound very "painful" to me... 
>
>Act 1, Scene 1: A street in suburban America
>
>Darcy: "Hey, you're Bobby Hatchett the notorious axe-murderer!"
>John Doe: "Huh?"

The actual words were more like "Fuck you! I was raped!". Then I realized I 
was mistaken, and shortly thereafter admitted error.

> [analogy continued]

The rest of your "analogy" is bullshit since you missed the critical step
right near the beginning. Let's rerun the analogy FAITHFULLY, shall we?

{Change scene to Wild West}

Darcy: "Hey, you're Bobby Hatchett the notorious axe-murderer!"
John Doe: "Fuck you, I'm no axe murder."
Darcy: "Oh, wait, I mistook you for someone else."
John Doe: "I can't BELIEVE that you could mistake me for an axe murder.
	   What kind of SICKO are you?"
Passerby #1: "Did someone say sicko?"
John Doe: "Yeah, him! He called me an axe murderer to deliberately cause me
	   mental anguish!"
Darcy: "Hey, wait a minute, you do share features in common..."
Passerby #2: "Did someone say Darcy was an axe murderer?"
John Doe: "He axed my psyche. What a sick, disgusting creature he is!"
Passerby #1: "There oughta be a law...."
Darcy: "You want an apology? I'm sorry. I made a mistake."
Passerby #2: "STRING 'IM UP! STRING 'IM UP!"
Lots_of_passersby_in_chorus: "LYNCH HIM! LYNCH HIM!"

{tar, feathers, noose around the neck, the whole bit...}

								- Kevin
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods)
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Organization: Misanthropes-R-Us
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 23:29:15 GMT

In article <1992Aug6.015014.26794@cfctech.cfc.com>
        kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin "The Wonder Badger" Darcy) writes:
]Look, Linda, it's pretty damn rare on Usenet for anyone to be saying
]"I can tell you all about <X>", where <X> is some taboo and/or hyper-
]sensitive subject. Given that it's rare, one must choose between two 
]unlikely possibilities:
]	A) The poster is a victim, and for some reason mistakes Usenet
]	   for a caring, sensitive place to share their painful secret
]		or
]	B) The poster is a perpetrator bragging about their exploits, and
]	   stupid enough to not know they will get flamed to a cinder for
]	   doing so.
]How does one tell the difference? Well, we look for cues in the context. If
]the tone is sensitive and compassionate and low-key, then it's probably (A), 
]but if it's braggy and confrontational, we go with (B).

So, using the newly-revealed secret of DarcyVision(R), I finally know how to
interpret the bumper sticker on a car in this neighborhood which reads
"Someone I love was murdered."  Since I can read it from several feet away,
it's clearly not low-key, and in fact since it's right out in public it must
be "braggy", so clearly this person is admitting to being the murderer.

Maybe, kebbie, instead of looking for "cues", you should be looking for "clues".
Then again, if you ever found one, you'd lose that charming, naive innocence
we've all come to know and loathe.
From: robinson@PSYVAX.PSY.UTEXAS.EDU (John G. Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: STEPHEN CHANEY STRIKES OUT! (or: Hey, Franklin, Look Who's On _Your_ Side!)
Date: 13 Aug 92 18:00:47 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin

In article <lefty-120892193508@lefty.apple.com>, lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
writes:
> In article <1992Aug12.223904.3027@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu
> (Stephen A Chaney) wrote:

[...]

> > >def: anal-ostrich: n, One who, rather than bury his head in the sand
> > >insists on burying it up his ass.
> > 
> > That's a classic. A pure, original classic. Let's just stop and give
> > this one a hearty round of applause because frankly, it is dead
> > accurate.
> 
> Which leads to the question: what _is_ the sound of one fool clapping?
> 

Or, perhaps, "If a fool claps in his office and no one is there to hear it,
will it make a noise?"

**********
John G. Robinson
robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu
From: dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Hanging with the HomeBoys
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 92 22:16:13 GMT
Reply-To: munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac
FollowUp-To: alt.flame
 <2a85b3b9.crud@crud.mn.org> <BssJyp.3MB@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM>
Keywords: 
Organization: More like Dis~, really.

In article <BssJyp.3MB@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM>, John F. Woods writes:

                           He's back!

Trashy wrote:

> >Do the police know about you?
> 
> No, it's just the fine collection of rusting car parts he has on the lawn out
> front.

And he's firing on all cylinders.  [In the form of three empty
cans of baked beans, and a used condom]

Have a challenged day, John-boy!

Dac
--
(your one true friend in alt.flame)
From: mikes@owlnet.rice.edu (Michael Shou-Yung Shum)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: SAW MINISTRY...AL SUCKS!!!
Date: 20 Aug 92 19:38:30 GMT
Organization: Rice University

In article <1992Aug20.173625.28789@bnr.ca> davisonj@bnr.ca (John Davison) writes:
>        Given that everything Ministry has done since _All_Day_/_Everyday_(Is_
>_Halloween)_ has been in the direction of reviving punk rock with samplers and

i generally agree, although i consider "over the shoulder", released a year
after "halloween" as their last good single (both of course were long ago
inducted into the clubclassic canon; nothing ministry has released since
has come close).

yours,m