HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: keegan@scoobiedoo.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: His friend and nobody else's, Kevin Darcy!
Date: 14 Apr 92 20:45:28 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
-> >...It's funny how anyone who disagrees 
-> >with your imagined [sick] understanding of events is branded a liar.
-> 
-> No, I only brand LIARS as liars. You made a false statement
-> about me allegedly "inflicting" [sic] a thread on news.admin
-> which I in fact never inflicted, and which I conspicuously
-> tried to redirect to alt.flame.

kevin, john made a statement which he supported with hard
evidence. in doing so, he exposed you as both a liar and a
hypocrite. his exposure was no big deal. you've been exposed as
worse quite frequently. why are you beating this dead horse and
arguing a point you've publically lost.

-> Then, you attempted to support that statement by dredging up
-> an unrelated quote from over 3 months prior to the thread in
-> question. That not only compounded your lie, but made you a
-> "backpedaler" as well.

no. it demonstrated that john researched his case and presented
his evidence. as it happens, his evidence was quite strong. i
don't think many regular readers/posters will have much doubt
about who is to be believed; you or john.

        "Kevin, your own credibility may continue to decrease
        with longevity, but that's not the case for everyone."
		Jeff d'Arcy <jdarcy@encore.com> 
		<15249@encore.Encore.COM>

--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7153 alt.politics.homosexuality:2406
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 17 Apr 92 06:52:44 GMT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

> Maybe not, on the other hand.  Frankly, I have great het-sex.  With
> the passing of each day, I love Elisa even more, and she turns me on
> to yet a higher plateau.

Good!!  Get married if you love her, have kids, and enjoy life...

> Sure as hell ain't because I find women yecchy.

Well, you're not a total lost cause.  :-)


===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
From: kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Declaration of War on PSU
Date: 7 Apr 92 16:52:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: wkuvx1.1992Apr7.115245.1238
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

What is it with you Preschool State people (for their benifit, I'll tell them
who they are: Ken Robinson, information gatherer-wannabe, and his faithful
puppet Doctor Dildo; woulnd't want to confuse them!) ?

I know you're out there... 

Oh, I see. You can't handle being the target of *real* flames, something you're
not used to since you can't create them yourselves. So you start ignoring
anyone who's obviously outflamed you recently, and then showing up again weeks
later to claim a victory you weren't even in the race for to begin with.

I say they tie for #1 alt.flame lamer.
-- 
Mark Kinney [KINNEMA@WKUVX1.(BITNET)(WKU.EDU)] | Don't just eat a hamburger,
This has been a test. If this had been an actual emergency, you'd be dead.
Quote of the Week: "Quaker-pop Rice Sparkies and Quaker-pop Wheat Sparkies,
	those delicious, nutritious breakfast cereals shot from guns!"
				-- Negativland, "Guns"
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7006 alt.politics.homosexuality:2283
From: gnn@wsl.dec.com (George Neville-Neil)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 16 Apr 92 21:31:07 GMT
Reply-To: gnn@wsl.dec.com (George Neville-Neil)
Organization: DEC Western Software Lab

In article <kH4aJB4w164w@Bogus.COM>, punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
|> twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
|> 
|> > Hardly.  She IS rather dynamic, for we are still involved.  Short
|> > memory, punk.
|> 
|> Something must be wrong if you have to go to guys...
|> 
Hardly.  As Bogie says in Casablanca:
"...must be getting broadminded."

|> If you loved her, you wouldn't be playing house with anyone else.
|> 

Since when does love == monogamy ???

Have you considered getting some shimming for your brain ??


-- 
Excuse me, could you scream just a little louder ??  I can't seem to hear
you.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods)
Subject: Re: Adam and Steve in the Garden of Eden
Organization: Misanthropes-R-Us
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 23:11:41 GMT

In <9204081511.19@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>In article <oHBsiB2w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>>krobinsn@eregion.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>> And speaking of wasted bandwidth, maybe not posting as much as you
>>You post more than ANYONE...  Mr Kettle...
>But his short term memory is so short, that as soon as he sends off an
>article, it is forgotten.

Can you blame him?
From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Accusations of Heterophobia (WAS Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts...)
Summary: Karstain is getting desperate
Date: 16 Apr 92 15:17:05 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <1992Apr13.130757.842@gacvx2.gac.edu>
karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) writes, in an
apparently pathetic attempt to redirect attention:

>In article heterophobe <83824@bu.edu>  writes:
	    ^^^^^^^^^^^

Perhaps you'd like to tell us all why you've decided to label me
this way. I know several special friends who'd be MOST interested.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: return of heterophobic Keegan
Summary: Stroker just keeps devolving, even as we watch...
Organization: William's Marsh
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 00:12:26 GMT

In article <kuc03aINN9u3@male.EBay.Sun.COM> peewee@playhouse.EBay.Sun.COM (Philip H. Stromer) writes:
>Iwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!1
>
>I didn't know Keegan was a HOMOSEXUAL.  Gross!

You still don't.  (Not that *that* would stop you.)

>Keegan is a R - O - O - T - S - L - U - R - P - E - R - !

How do you know?  Personal experience?

>Hey Keegan, why do you like to PACK FUDGE?  Why don't you just
>go work in a Baskin Robbins' store instead, you HOMO?!

I hate to tell you, but he's already got a real job -- what's the matter,
are you getting lonely?

>You like to stuff your cavernous rectum with gooey semen from
>big beefy football players, eh?

He didn't make any such claim -- but you sure did.  I'm sure you can find
some of those big beefy football players to help you with your little
problem.

>	Keegan was a man from Peru
>	Who fell asleep in a canoe
>	While dreaming of Venus
>	He played with his penis
>	And woke with a hand full of goo.

Lame.  Some of the rest of us read alt.tasteless, too.

>Keegan, you had much more credibility before you were OUTED.  No
>person likes HOMOS, except another HOMO.

Is that so?  I guess that's why my wife (a typical farmer's daughter from
the wheatfields of South Dakota) and I both have a few gay friends?  She'll
get a good laugh out of your little pronouncement when I show it to her
after work tonight...

>What's it like to go in the men's bathroom and get TURNED ON, you
>big FAIRY?  How can another man NOT LIKE TITTIES and TWATS?  Do
>you hang out with NAMBLA?

Funny, I thought you'd be in bed with them -- you're the one that talks
about 'em more than anyone else in this newsgroup...

>Have a nice weekend.  Being a ROOTSLURPER is your right, just as
>it's my right to despise you and all other HOMOS!!!!!!

Must be fun, not having the balls to look yourself in the mirror...

>--Philip Stromer, the few, the proud, the heterosexual--

More like the loudmouthed, the terrified, the terminally stupid...

>Disclaimer:  Opinions expressed by me are mine, politically correct,
>	     and do not represent Sun Microsystems or its management.

They're damned grateful for that, I expect...


-- 
Patrick L. Humphrey  (patrick@is.rice.edu)  Rice Networking & Computing Systems
  +1 713 528-3626 at Rice. 713 776-1541 at home. 713 527-4056 at Willy's Pub.

                        The SubGenius MUST have Slack!
From: 6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Fags vs. Bisexuals
Date: 13 Apr 92 00:11:10 GMT

In article <Lis5iB4w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

>Seems to me that his viewpoint is evidence of a free and thinking
>mind.. 

I'm certain that there is indeed space to rent in Comstock Hardnose's
mind.  That's about all that's free there.  Thinking?  I think the
moldy bread in a frat-house refrigerator would be a more interesting
conversationalist.

>Why does a man have to suck weenie to be smart?

See me previous post about stupid heterosexuals who believe all those
who advocate civil rights for everybody, including gays, must be gay.

Now, sucking weenie =! intelligence booster, but in Saltlick's case,
one must start somewhere, I suppose.  

 - I'll bet your
>one of these doofus's that thinks he's kool just because he wears
>stupid neon colored cheap plastic too 'eh?

What this means I have yet to fathom. . . perhaps you could explain it
to me?  Or am I stumbling over the obvious here?  I actually don't
wear plastic at all. . . 

>-djk

>--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
>-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----

We have yet to find a solution for bigotry like yours.

cws

Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: slang
Followup-To: alt.politics.homosexuality
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 15:39:10 GMT

In article <jco7l1o@fido.asd.sgi.com> dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:

>As a point of amusement, does anyone out there know what the slang
>word "punk" means?  How about you, Jack (punk@bogus.com).  
>
>I'll tell you, because this is rather funny....
>
>Punk is a slang term, in the african american community, which means
>the same thing as "faggot"...

Or "a young boy kept by an older homosexual man."  I particularly
liked that definition during the most recent NAMBLA thread.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Someone here suggested blue square badges for
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  straights.  Maybe we should try mauve
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  heptagons?" - Damian Cugley, on soc.bi
From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Where Karsten Likes To Do It
Date: 12 Apr 92 19:28:40 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Originator: kane@buast7.bu.edu

----------------------------------------------------------------------
From Article: 70888 of alt.sex
From: karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick)
Subject: Re: The world's best places to make love
Date: 9 Apr 92 05:46:36 GMT

1.  In a weight room on a bench (after a workout)
2.  On a tennis court (on a hot day)
3.  In a sauna, while sipping Long Island Ice Teas
4.  On a running washing machine (spin cycle, hot/warm wash)
5.  On a cold, hard floor (like marble)
6.  On a Super-size bed, surrounded with lots of stuffed animals
7.  In a gun closet/armory
8.  A locker room
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In a LOCKER ROOM?

Since when are locker rooms co-ed?

Or does all that butt-patting on the football field just give you
some scrumptious ideas?

Since
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6632 alt.politics.homosexuality:2036 alt.sex:14267
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 13 Apr 92 00:50:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: amhux2.1992Apr13.005053.13543
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA

In article <B9e6iB9w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>sbl2@ellis.uchicago.edu (S.B. Lawsky) writes:
>
>> _homophobe_: n, a person who fears or hates homosexuals and
>> homosexuality.
>> 
>> _homophobia_: n, unreasoning fear of or antipathy towards homosexuals
>> and homosexuality
>
>Lots of words in there that are trash in nature. Some carry the
>word 'fuck' too. 'Faggot' is also in there. :-)

Regardless of the "trash" content of any of these words (ach! such a
word queen you are), they exist in a dictionary, contrary to your
claims.  A few messages ago you said that "homophobia" was not a
"real" word because it doesn't exist in a dictionary.  Now that we
have proven that it does, you're saying, "Well, it's not a real word
anyway."  Give it up, Danny boy.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Someone here suggested blue square badges for
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  straights.  Maybe we should try mauve
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  heptagons?" - Damian Cugley, on soc.bi
From: jcc@frog.UUCP (Jim Chagnon)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 16 Apr 92 22:33:00 GMT
Organization: CRDS

In article <LRZ7iB4w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>jcc@frog.UUCP (Jim Chagnon) writes:

>> ...."hehehe" Jack Royce....."hehehe" The Dark Knight.....

>Huh?

 Just pointing out one of the similarities in your posting "styles".

 I could also have put '"hehehe" djk....', but you seem a much closer
match, even if you count initials.

more:

	Dick Knight		JCRoyce	               DJK
	-----------		-------              ---------
   Uses a handle 'cause     Used a handle 'cause     Uses real name.
   he has "enemies",past    he has "enemies".
   and present.

   sendsys'd  K e n.        Flamed mercilessly by    ever messed with
                            K e n.                   Ken?

   sendsys'd Ronnie Jr.     Flamed mecilessly by     In Ronnie Jr. fan
                            Jr.                      club.

   sendsys'd lots of        Flames lots of 'fags'    Flames 'fags'.
   'uppity fags'.           'cause they think
                            they're better than
                            straights.

   Stupidly lashes out,     Claims to want dialog    Flames 'fags'.
   then claims to have      to promote understand-
   done it to promote       ing, then stupidly
   understanding.           lashes out.

   Illiterate.              Illiterate.              Semi-literate(?).

   "hehehe"                 "hehehe"                 "hehehe"


 By The Laws of Michigan and Usenet Guidelines According to Kevin Darcy,
I've got enough evidence here to have you swinging at the end of a rope
by sundown.

jcc

       ......hehehe....
From: 6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts TO Justify "Queer Nation"(FIXED .SIG)
Date: 11 Apr 92 00:10:38 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.212413.2964@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> jfh@greenber.austin.ibm.com (John F Haugh II) writes:

>BZZT!  Thank YOU for playing, but YOU are wrong.  As punishment,
>you are sentenced to a course in multivariable statistics.  If
>you analyze based on the real risk factors - which are homosexual
>intercourse, IV drug abuse, and prostitution, us non-drug abusing
>non-prostitute using heterosexuals remain a much lower (15 times
>lower or so ...) risk group than the aforementioned risk groups.

My point is that heterosexuals are at risk, and that that risk is
increasing.  If a gay man engages in safe sex, given two uninfected
partners, then the risk is no higher than in a monogamous
heterosexual couple.  Indeed, more gay men as a percentage have aids,
and indeed, more will develop it in time.  So will more
straight people.  If one partner is infected, gay or straight,
the risk is greater.  "Homosexual intercourse" is a meaningless term.

>Now, you COULD argue that all heterosexuals abuse drugs and visit
>prostitutes, but that would be a lie.  Of course, I could argue
>that the sexuals behavior of homosexuals is (from a disease
>spreading perspective) equivalent to drug abuse and prostitution
>and you'd be hard pressed to refute that position given the numbers
>from your precious CDC ...

I think you are starting to foam at the mouth.  Karsten implies that
he is somehow in a special catagory - only he would know this.  But
its both stupid and dangerous to say "I am a monogamous heterosexual,
therefore am am at a lower risk than all gay men."  This is
simply untrue.

>Whereas you are a liar?

If I have misstated, I apologize (take heed, Kibble).  I am not in 
the habit of lying.  Perhaps Saltlick isn't lazy or ignorant, but
I doubt it.

Oh, OB alt-flame- fuck you.

cws
From: ladage@pnet07.cts.com (Kenneth David Ladage)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Hi idiots
Date: 9 Apr 92 05:05:23 GMT
Organization: People-Net [pnet07], San Diego, CA

maxwell@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Mark Story) writes:
>HA HA HA HA HA!
>
>- Mark



For someone who has made comments to the effect of 'there is no intelligence
in this newsgroup' you have made very little improvement on the norm seen
around here...


                                                Until Wisdom Prevails,

                                                - Kenneth David Ladage


UUCP: {nosc crash ncr-sd}!pnet07!ladage
ARPA: baron!pnet07!ladage@nosc.mil
INET: ladage@pnet07.cts.com
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6340 alt.politics.homosexuality:1842
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 92 02:23:00 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:

> In article <LeXwiB3w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
> >dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
> >> Do you have an issue with two men kissing being on the cover of a magazine
> >I do.. A gag reflex. (sorry Jeff!)
> 
> All it takes is practice, Daniel. Relaxation.
> 
> Start with a banana. A warm, tasty banana. Put it in your mouth. Slide
> it down your throat. Try to get it past the entrance to your throat.
> You will gag. Take it out, relax your throat some more, and try again.
> 
> When you become reasonably adept at that, try it with a real cock.
> It's best if you are upside down with respect to your partner - face
> pointed towards the toes. Open your mouth, suck the cock generously,
> and then slide it down your throat. Really, it's easy, and fun!
> 
> >-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
> 
> Must explain why you're having such a hard time with one of the oldest
> problems of all. Give me a call if you want to try some of that
> innovation on me, sugar.
> 
> why are you Nitro.CtEdge.COM and not nitro.ctedge.com?
> -- 
>                 __
> nelson@reed.edu \/                   There is absolutely no other possibility


I was wondering how long it would take for this to occur.. 

I actually got a REAL BIG hard-on (you sweeties would love it!)
just thinking about it!!!!! BOY!

Is the wife in for a treat tonite.....

-djk

And I really like my Nitro.CtEdge.COM - 

"get used to it."

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6909 talk.abortion:15483
From: keegan@windsurf.crd.ge.com (james g keegan jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: the group "TO ME"
Date: 16 Apr 92 00:21:56 GMT
Reply-To: keegan@windsurf.crd.ge.com (james g keegan jr)
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

if you thought the GROUP kevin darcy and the INDIVIDUAL kevin
darcy series was entertaining, get a peek at this.

this is an exchange between linda and kevin.

linda>	Idiot.  The net is not here to serve you, and you alone.

kevin>	Where did I imply that the Net existed to serve me ALONE??

linda replies quoting kevin:

        "What constructive purpose did the posting of his private
        email serve TO ME?" 
	            ^^^^^^
	Kevin Darcy
        <1992Mar29.182951.28031@rotag.mi.org>

to which kevin responds:

	"To me" is clearly a subset of "to everyone", Linda.

take your medication. go to sleep.

        'Actually, my main reservation at this stage of the game
        is that the sobriquet "net.idiot" may not fully describe
        him. "Lord High Fuckwit", maybe...'  
		-- lefty@apple.com
	        <9108270050.AA04989@internal.apple.com>

--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 02:35:12 GMT

In article <H41ZiB2w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:

>dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
>
>> But fucking was not in the paper.  Therefore, it was a straw man.
>
>Beside the point.  Tim Pierce said that that SHOULD be allowed, go back,
>read the message.  He wasn't talking about kissing in that message, he was
>talking about fucking.  Read it.

I think that pictures of people fucking should be allowed in
newspapers and magazines.  But I'm not interested in a double
standard.  I'm not interested in a system whereby pictures of nude
people involved in same-sex intercourse are permitted, while images of
heterosexual intercourse are not, or vice versa.  My general position
is that keeping a prurient attitude toward depicting sex is harmful to
all concerned.

>> Learn to argue.  Putting up a straw man (which is what your "fucking in 
>> the newspaper" argument is) and then defending it, is changing the argument.
>> However, since you resisted my putting the argument back on track, I will
>> address your point.
>
>Ah, no, it was not my straw hat.  Tim Pierce addressed someone's straw hat,
>and made an issue out of it.  So, the sidetrack was not on my part.

Straw hats ... I love it.

>> Pictures of two men fucking is pornography, just like pictures of a man and
>> a woman fucking.  Yes.  However, there was not picture on two men fucking
>> uncovered on the newsstands.  It was a picture of two men kissing, which is
>> not pornographic.
>
>Glad you agree about pornography.  Now, why does Tim Pierce want that to be
>"uncovered in newsstands" (out for everyone to see)?  Thats what he says.

If one form of pornography is permitted to be uncovered in newsstands,
so should others.  Consistency is what I seek.

>> Your straw man has been burned.
>
>Oh, if the straw hat fits, wear it, moron.

I like that.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Someone here suggested blue square badges for
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  straights.  Maybe we should try mauve
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  heptagons?" - Damian Cugley, on soc.bi
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6794 alt.politics.homosexuality:2131