From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: The EAGLES have landed OR Cowboys caught with pants down!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 17:18:43 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.152856.8665@unet.net.com> asgari@tac22.unet.com (Asgari Roger) writes:
>In article <1992Oct6.211413.5105@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>>In article <1992Oct6.171348.25923@unet.net.com> asgari@ssc01.unet.com (Asgari Roger) writes:
>>>In article <1992Oct6.043023.18749@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>>>>FINAL SCORE:
>>>>Eagles:  31
>>>>Cowboys:  7  Ouch...
>>>>
>>>>Whip a tie, I O, get along little doggey, your misfortune and
>>>>none of my own. :-)
>>>>
>>>>Now let's see, the Eagles dropped a bomb on the Cowboys.
>>>>It was disguised as a superior overall, balanced offense/defense.
>>>>True, Cunningham's overall stats were not great, but they
>>>>certainly alot better than Aikman. Aikman is a FRAUD! The
>>>>space ship that dropped him off on this planet better come
>>>>by on the next shuttle and pick him up. :-) Man, what a CHOKER!
>
>
>	"Aikman is fraud". Are you jesting or are you a moran.
>	Either way you come off as nonsensical; and that's puting 
>	it diplomaticly, something you wouldn't know about!!
>		
Come on, I dare you. Try me. :-) Well, I am not a moran, hmmm, what
is a *moran", MORON! :-) To all you netters out there, clue: I see
r.s.f.p. as a humorous newsgroup. I certainly don't take anything seriously
or personally. My approach is to either discuss rationally, or to disrupt
the morons and ruffle their feathers, irk them, etc. For anyone to seriously
believe their team is the best and predict Team A will kick Team B's ass is
mildly absurd and bordering on ludicrous. Just look at last weeks so called
"sure winners", yeah, right! 

>>>>Herschel came thru when needed. WHAM BAM, How do you 'MAM!
>>>>I love it when the Cowboys lose. I don't why, but I just do.
>>>>It must have something to do with all these American Pie Shit
>>>>or something. :-)
>>>>-- 
>
>		YOU NEED HELP!!!
>
I would be foolish to say NOT. Listen my fellow man, we all need help
in this planet. 
>>>
>>>		Listen old chap, atleast Troy tossed for over 200 yards,
>>>	I believe Cunningham only passed for 124 yards. True,  Troy was
>>>	intercepted 3 times, but Cunningham did not have an interception
>>>	free night either.  
>>>
>>>		A well deserved  victory by all accounts for the eagles;
>>>	however, what amazed moi was the simple fact that da Pokes had 
>>>	more offensive yards than the birds. Not the most important stat
>>>	but there you have it.
>>>
>>>
>>>		GO COWBOYS!!!!!!
>>
>>When are you folks ever going to learn! Numbers on STAT SHEETS
>>DO NOT WIN GAMES. Repeat after me, STAT SHEETS DO NOT WIN GAMES.
>>I love it when ESPN shows the 300+ passers; 100+ rushers, etc.,
>>and they indicate a (won), (loss) by the player/team. It is
>>amazing how often there is a (loss) by the name. So, I really
>>don't give a rat's ass to a sour apple who passed for what, or
>>who ran for what. Who WON. Thank YOU!
>
>	I merely mention this as every bloody Eagles fan were
>	eluding to the fact that you had obliterated Dallas. 
>	This is not to say it was a close game, however I thought
>	I would point out it was a relevant stat: that being total
>	offensive yards. GET IT!!!!!!!!!!
>
I never disputed that fact. The only fact that amounts to dudley squat
my fellow man, is the WIN/LOSS column. What part of that don't you
understand?
>>
>>Since you addressed my as an old chap, I gather you must be a
>>sniveling, snot hanging, mouth full of wires, kid. :-)
>>
>
>	You must be a bigger moran than I first thought. Do you
>	not recognise facetiousness when you see it. "Kid"?
>	I am in my late 20's, what are you? An old man you cretin!!
>>-- 
Ditto, you ARE a bigger MORON (please learn how to spell m-o-r-o-n),
                                                               ^
I WAS being facetious. What a buffon!
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  Let us be thankful for the fools; but for them the rest
  of us could not succeed.  -   Mark Twain