HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: snh1@crux1.cit.cornell.edu (Sanjay Hiranandani - N2MRZ)
Subject: Re: FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON
Organization: Cornell Information Technologies
Date: 22 Nov 92 01:07:31 GMT

cubsfan@camelot.bradley.edu (Michael Silverman) writes:
>The average Republican once again astounds the world with intellignt,
>thoughful political discourse.

Thank you for your thoughtful insight, but maybe the poster is just
a diehard Al Gore fan..  :)
From: neil.black@uttsbbs.uucp (Neil Black) 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton
Subject: RE: ROBERT BORK
Date: 23 Nov 92 14:54:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Transfer Station BBS, Danville, CA - 510-837-4610/837-5591
Reply-To: neil.black@uttsbbs.uucp (Neil Black) 

My brother's girlfriend used to be on the editorial staff of a student
newspaper out here on the west coast.  It was during this time that Bork
came out here for a speaking engagement, and it was her (we'll call here
Sally) job to go to the airport and pick him up, then drive him to the
engagement.

Well, they barely got out of the airport when Bork started asking Sally
to stop at a bar.  Turns out, they stopped at 2 bars on the way to the
show.  Once they arrived, Sally took Mr. Bork to his dressing room.  A
good sized bottle of vodka and some mixers were awaiting him.  Seems
that Bork requires rather large amounts of liquor to be available to him
as part of the contract.

Bork might be intelligent (he could name the capitals of all 50 states
or something), but his views were crazy and he's an alcoholic.  I can't
believe that Republicans are still whining about the canning of this man
from the Supreme Court.  It is BECAUSE of people like him that you
bonehead Republicans lost the election on such a wide scale.  The
Republican party has become overrun with right-wing fundamentalist
christians like Pat Robertson and Jerry Fallwell.  These people do not
have the interest of their country at heart, only of their pocketbook
and obscene morality.

Believe me.  Democrats WANT Republicans to stick around.  We don't want
to see the disappearance of an entire party.  Democracy works best when
there are opposing views.  But if boneheads like Rich Bond and Charles
Black continue to hold their positions in the Republican heirarchy, the
party will disintigrate into nothingness.
                                                                        
Xref: sparky alt.politics.clinton:17612 alt.president.clinton:624 talk.politics.misc:61249
From: an030@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Broward Horne)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.president.clinton,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON
Date: 21 Nov 1992 23:16:37 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: an030@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Broward Horne)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (droopy) says:

>mmaggio@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Michael J Anthony Maggio) writes:
>
>>mahunt@eos.ncsu.edu (MARK ALLAN HUNT) writes:
>
>
>>>I think the subject line says it all !!!!!!
>
>I believe that is between Bill and Hillary.
>

        That remains to be seen.  

                                
>

Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton
From: belld@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (David Bell)
Subject: Arkansas Trip
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 05:10:44 GMT

My wife and I are planning a weekend trip down to Arkansas to see things
firsthand.  What's nice this time of year?  Has Little Rock been overrun
with liberals?


Xref: sparky alt.politics.clinton:17503 alt.president.clinton:577 talk.politics.misc:60991
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.president.clinton,talk.politics.misc
From: dcriswel@oracle.uucp (David Criswell)
Subject: Re: FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON
Organization: Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores CA
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 02:22:36 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
              at Oracle Corporation.  The opinions expressed are those
              of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.

>From oracle!pyramid!gossip.pyramid.com!olivea!charnel!rat!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!biosci!agate!stanford.edu!rock!taco!mahunt Thu Nov 19 18:08:27 PST 1992


>I think the subject line says it all !!!!!!

>Send flames to alt.to.bad.the.country.will.be.fucked.up.for.four.more.years

>Second thought KILL CLINTON,KILL CLITON,KILL CLINTON !!!!!!!

Thank you, Mark. Say 'hi' to the guy that posted that he was planning to
kill Gov. Wilson. I doubt they let him out yet.


>Appealing to your subconcious.

Thanks for sharing, do write us again when the Secret Service lets you out.
We've enjoyed having this thoughtful political discussion and we'll miss 
you dearly.


				Yours,
					The First Church of Gary Stollman.
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.president.clinton,talk.politics.misc
From: frist@ccu.umanitoba.ca ()
Subject: State Department revealations  
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:55:29 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.162133.12799@csrd.uiuc.edu> saarinen@sp1.csrd.uiuc.edu (Sirpa Saarinen) writes:
>Considering the latest revelations of the State dept. inquiry into people's
>passport files, I can only say that I am very pleased to get rid of Bush
>et al. Aren't you at all worried and offended about how Bush screwed you? 
>
>Another four years of a Bush Banana Republic administration and we would
>be looking for democratic advisors from South America and PRC.
>
>Sirpa Saarinen
>saarinen@csrd.uiuc.edu
>

Sorry, we don't always get complete news on what's going on back home in 
the USA from Canadian media. Could you fill elaborate on the
State Dept. inquiries of which you speak?


===============================================================================
Brian Fristensky                | 
Department of Plant Science     |
University of Manitoba          | I'm gonna miss DAN-O! 
Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2  CANADA    |  
frist@ccu.umanitoba.ca          |   :-)  :-) :-) 
Office phone:   204-474-6085    | 
FAX:            204-261-5732    |
===============================================================================

Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc
From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
Subject: Re: We're all stupid!!! (was Gays in Military)
Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Distribution: world, na, usa
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 23:33:36 GMT

In article <1992Nov21.011949.26597@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes:
>The number of HIV cases due to heterosexual intercourse amoung young military
>age (not neccesarly in the military though) people is much higher than 
>the number due to gay sex.    

This is false, according to every CDC report I've seen.  Keep in mind that
gay men are only 2%-5% of the population, and still have higher rates of HIV
infection, even if their number has dropped to 30-50% of HIV cases.

>Once upon a time the gay HIV rate was higher, but not any more.

Please note the difference between "rate" and "number."  If the gay HIV
rate was the same as the heterosexual rate, we'd see no more than 5% of
new HIV cases coming from homosexuals, and that simply isn't the case.

>But then again, discrimination against gays really isn't about logic, is it?

It really isn't.  This whole AIDS thing as an excuse to keep gays out of the
military is just a red herring.  But that doesn't excuse spreading
misinformation in response to the bigotry.
-- 
ted frank                     | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu 
standard disclaimers          | void where prohibited
the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: PKD's Time out of Joint **Spoilers!!** Re: Science Fiction?
Date: 16 Nov 92 23:53:21 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <1992Nov16.214440.6686@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>For a good look at life under a Clinton administartion, check out the
>1980 film "The Last Chase".  :-)

Heh, heh.  "The Day After", for that scary period in I think '83 or
'84 when the Soviets realized that Reagan's "evil empire" rhetoric
wasn't just campaign posturing.  I recall they sent agents all over
Western Europe looking for NATO armies poised to invade the East. :-)

>
>"Morning In America"?  I don't think I know that one.

"Morning In America" is a Reagan commercial from '80 (or '84) that
essentially presented a nostalgic vision of the United States in terms
of small towns.  Of course, this Norman Rockwellish picture of
rural/small-town America is more fiction than reality, a glimpse of
our Golden Age myth.  Perhaps it existed around 1900, certainly not
afterwards, as America industrialized and urbanized.



In fiscal year 1991, the government agencies classified as secret a
total of 7,107,017 documents.  This marks the first time that the
total number of reported classification decisions in a year is a
palindrome.		-- 1991 Information Security Oversight Office
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.president.clinton,talk.politics.misc
From: matjmm@gsusgi1.gsu.edu (J. Morgan Morris)
Subject: Re: FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON
Organization: Georgia State University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:08:53 GMT

mahunt@eos.ncsu.edu (MARK ALLAN HUNT) writes:


>I think the subject line says it all !!!!!!

>Send flames to alt.to.bad.the.country.will.be.fucked.up.for.four.more.years

>Second thought KILL CLINTON,KILL CLITON,KILL CLINTON !!!!!!!

>Appealing to your subconcious.


I am surprised that someone in your mental state is allowed access to
the net. It is in poor taste to post your "second thought" whether
you believe it or not. Get a grip on yourself.

-- 

John Morgan Morris
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
Georgia State University
University Plaza
Atlanta, GA. 30303-3083

Internet: matjmm@gsusgi1.gsu.edu
Telephone: (404) 651-2253
FAX: (404) 651-2246

Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.president.clinton,talk.politics.misc
From: snoopy@crchh426.BNR.CA (Antonio Tello)
Subject: Re: FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON
Reply-To: snoopy@crchh426.BNR.CA (Antonio Tello)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:40:47 GMT

mahunt@eos.ncsu.edu (MARK ALLAN HUNT) writes:
|>
|>I think the subject line says it all !!!!!!
|>Send flames to alt.to.bad.the.country.will.be.fucked.up.for.four.more.years
                                                              ^^^^^^^^^^
                                                              I'm glad that
                                                              you admit things
                                                              have been
f*ck*d.up
                                                              for at
least the past 
                                                              four (or
is it twelve)
                                                              years !

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
These thoughts are mine alone and not supported by my company, friends or
relatives.  Please consult  your  parent,  guardian, lawyer and local law
enforcement ageny prior to following any advice contained above.
NOTE:  I am on a  Canadian node  and need distribution  of NA to see your
replies. E-mail to snoopy@crchh426.BNR.CA.
From: dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu ( )
Subject: Re: Annoying Computer Junk Mail
Organization: North Carolina State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 23:01:37 GMT

In article <1eb01kINNegp@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> 
skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds) writes:

>dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:

>> Has anyone been receiving automated computer junk mail
>> from a site called 'Campaign92.org'?   I've been trying to
>> contact the sysadmins at that site to stop sending me
>> their crap, but they've ignored me.  
 
> Send a mail message to them, NOT A REPLY, in the subject line 
> put:  remove all
>
> That will take care of it.

I received two other suggestions via e-mail: send an 
e-mail message with the subject line "REMOVE CONTACTS" 
to Surveys@Campaign92.Org, or send an e-mail message to
the same address with the subject line "remove contact".  
I tried the former, and it seems to have accepted it.

Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.president.clinton,talk.politics.misc
From: mmaggio@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Michael J Anthony Maggio)
Subject: Re: FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON,FUCK CLINTON
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 17:31:27 GMT

mahunt@eos.ncsu.edu (MARK ALLAN HUNT) writes:


>I think the subject line says it all !!!!!!

>Send flames to alt.to.bad.the.country.will.be.fucked.up.for.four.more.years

>Second thought KILL CLINTON,KILL CLITON,KILL CLINTON !!!!!!!

>Appealing to your subconcious.

I agree...and everyone in my fine town agrees... my subconcious needs no
  sublimination... Everyone elses does...
But I'd like to know how to do it in such a morally bankrupt society where
  Bill et al. is actually in office now...


Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,soc.culture.asian.american
From: georgew@hspice.portal.com (George Wu)
Subject: Re: Hillary Clinton....1st Women President ?
Organization: Meta - Software
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:04:42 GMT

-
     Likewise, Eleanor Roosevelt is reputed to have wielded Presidential
power after her husband's death.  In general, the First Lady is always going
to be the President's closest confident and advisor.

     I don't see the objection to Hillary's personality.  I'd rather see a
woman of character than a mouse in the office.  Bill Clinton's choice of wife
merely reflects a man confident of his own goals and identity.

							George


-- 
----
George J Wu,  georgew@hspice.portal.com or georgew@metasw.com
Meta-Software,  1300 White Oaks Road,  Campbell, CA 95008,  (408) 369-5400
Never be the first to believe.  Never be the last to deceive.  ---  Chess
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: PKD's Time out of Joint **Spoilers!!** Re: Science Fiction?
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 18:15:49 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.230426.15962@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>In article <1992Nov11.185107.6145@news.columbia.edu> egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:
>>
>>What I really want is a HARM (High Speed Anti-Radiation Missile.  It's
>>used to blow up enemy radar sets.) set-up for my car.  Those pesky
>>cops with their radar guns....
>>
>Geez, no one has repsect for the police these days!

My diet has too many Schwarzenneger films....

>
>What we need is to keep building the stealth aircraft, in case another
>Iraq-type country threatnes the world.  And then GM culd adopt the same
>technology for its newest sports cars
>(Unless we can't drive cars because after Clinton's environmental policies
>are enacted).   :-)

Stealth cars may prove too difficult to find in those mall parking lots.
Chaos would ensue.

>
>Now the Democrats have perfected virtual reality--remember the late 70's??
>-)    (our enemies are really nice people-yeah right!!)

"Morning In America" was pretty virtual, if I recall.  Reagan creating
a virtual America that might have existed around the turn of the
century and so on :-)




In fiscal year 1991, the government agencies classified as secret a
total of 7,107,017 documents.  This marks the first time that the
total number of reported classification decisions in a year is a
palindrome.		-- 1991 Information Security Oversight Office
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton
Subject: You're so kind!
From: cvafy006@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu
Date: 22 Nov 92 21:33:28 PST
Distribution: usa
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Nntp-Posting-User: cvafy006

In article <1992Nov23.001924.1000@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn) writes:
>      Wow. California really *has* lowered the entrance requirements for state 
> universities. Glad I got out in time. Check out that Bush-style command of 
> thought continuity. Now I know why Pomona is known as the lesser Poly.
> 
>                                        Steve
> ///
> -- 
>     Steve Casburn (scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)
>     They gave me differential calculus, and I said "Hit me again"
>     So they gave me integral calculus, and I said "Hit me again"
>     Now I have vector calculus, and...I'm starting to lose consciousness...

	Thank you for the compliment.   To call my opinion a Bush-style
command of thought continuity is a great honor -- Bush is king!

	And, no.  SLO is the lesser poly!  Our Rose Float Club is starting
to decorate and they're still building.  Note:  WE have the more difficult
section!!!
Xref: sparky alt.politics.clinton:17707 alt.politics.democrats.d:667 alt.politics.elections:24282 ba.politics:7350 co.politics:2328 ne.politics:3087 nj.politics:789 or.politics:709 ny.politics:310 talk.politics.misc:61455
From: rgoers@iset.scan.mc.xerox.com (Ron Goers)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.elections,ba.politics,co.politics,ne.politics,nj.politics,or.politics,ny.politics,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: VOTE, BABY, VOTE!
Date: 23 Nov 92 17:55:50 GMT
Organization: Imaging Science Engineering & Technology, Xerox Corporation

In article <1992Nov23.020821.10621@mercury.cair.du.edu> jvilhube@diana.cair.du.edu (Jan Vilhuber) writes:
>In article <1992Nov20.131424.16306@spectrum.xerox.com> rgoers@iset.scan.mc.xerox.com (Ron Goers) writes:
>>

>If not... well lets just say I feel sorry that another perfectly good
>brain is going unused.
>
>I don't believe in no GOD, so I'll just keep projecting my figures out 
>a few million years. As for the afterlife (or eternal life as you called it):
>I'm looking forward to peaceful oblivion.

... brains going unused ... like yours?  "I don't believe in no God", a double
negative, which in fact implies that you DO believe in God.  If this is the
case, why would you *not* be interested in your eternal future?  

Try making some sense next post ...

-- 
| rgoers@iset.scan.mc.xerox.com | Let me sing just 10 true words.          |
|                               | I'd rather sing just 10 true words,      |
|               Charlie Peacock | Than 100 words, that in the end,         |
|            The Secret of Time | Amount to nothing, absolutely nothing.   |
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton
From: jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl)
Subject: Re: Gays in the military
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 22:15:05 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM Rochester

In article <4jjc3vv@Unify.Com>, tsv@Unify.com (Tim Vannaman) writes:
|> I heard on Rush's show a  GOOD argument for not letting gays in the military.
|> 
|> Ok, when you serve in the armed forces, you get free/VERY cheap healthcare for the
|> rest of your life.  (and your spouse)
|> 
|> Q. #1  What is one of the most expensive illnesses?   AIDS!
|> Q. #2  What lifestyle is one (if not the highest) highest risk category for AIDS?  Gays
[ignorance deleted]

OK!  Fine.  By that token, let's ban all people with a 
history of cancer in the family from the military.  
These people are in a very high risk category for 
getting cancer which is just too expensive for the 
military to pay for.  Next smokers.  Then people who 
eat fatty foods!

This is possibly the worst argument for keeping gays 
out of the military I have ever heard.  I also noticed
that you were stupid enough to lump lesbians in with 
homosexual men.  Tsk, tsk, tsk.  Promiscuity causes AIDS,
not being gay.  

Anyone who has ever been in the military or has had friends
in the military know that our fighting boys are VERY 
promiscuous!  I don't know anyone who was in the military
who doesn't have a few stories to tell!

Obviously, you have never thought about this for yourself,
which explains why you listen to Rush Limbaugh.  Rush is
for people too lazy and bigotted to form an opinion of
their own.  

Jared Dahl
Opinions expressed are mine, not IBM's.
From: sfreedkin@igc.apc.org (Steve Freedkin)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton
Subject: UPDATE ON CLINTON/GORE E-MAIL
Date: 23 Nov 92 03:37:00 GMT
Nf-ID: #N:cdp:1588800061:000:1019
Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!sfreedkin    Nov 22 19:37:00 1992


From: Steve Freedkin <sfreedkin>
Subject: UPDATE ON CLINTON/GORE E-MAIL

/* Written  7:36 pm  Nov 22, 1992 by sfreedkin@igc.apc.org in igc:elections.usa */
/* ---------- "UPDATE ON CLINTON/GORE E-MAIL" ---------- */
I received the following status update from Jock Gill, the man in charge
of Clinton/Gore Email, on CompuServe on 18 November 1992, FYI.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: President-Elect's Office
To: Steve Freedkin, 76200,3421
Date: Fri, Nov 20, 1992, 9:02 PM
Subject: Are you there yet?

Steve,

Thank you for your note.  I am here.  But doing research.

I hope to have interesting things to say about the Clinton/Gore Email
Connection in the near future.  Until then, please be patient.

FYI:

 The U. S. Mail addresss for the Clinton/Gore Transition Team is:

        Office of the President-Elect
        Atkins Building
        105 West Capital Street,  Suite 400
        Little Rock,  Arkansas   72201

        Telephone: (501) 374-3322


Regards, 
Jock Gill
Xref: sparky alt.politics.clinton:17417 alt.politics.democrats.d:628 alt.politics.elections:24095 ba.politics:7237 co.politics:2185 ne.politics:3045 nj.politics:765 or.politics:681 ny.politics:285 talk.politics.misc:60759
From: Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: VOTE, BABY, VOTE!
X-Xxdate: Thu, 19 Nov 92 17:00:30 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Engineering & Sciences Company
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:04:33 GMT

In article <10624@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> Mark Wilson,
mwilson@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM writes:
>My, my Doc, don't get yourself into another dither.
>
>While enlighted tax laws, (read drastically lower) will help new
companies
>to form, excessive wage rates will still prevent this from happening.
>If the workers are asking for more than they are worth, no amount of
>government proding will make them employed.

And who decides what is reasonable, the companies? Welcome back to
the sweat-shop days of old. The fact is that for most manufacturing
companies employee salaries is not their major expenditure. I contend that
there are plenty of examples of companies which treat their employees
very well and still prosper. What is needed is better, more imaginative,
and better motivated, corporate executives.

>
>BTW, I notice that you have gone back to your old sig.

It never changed. Where have you been? I still offer no apology. My
reasons have been stated ad nauseum.

Norman

Dr. Norman J. LaFave
Senior Engineer
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company




When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
                               Hunter Thompson
From: MDP115@psuvm.psu.edu (Ponte)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Election Anomoly questions..
Date: 22 Nov 92 20:33:23 GMT
Organization: Penn State University


       I wsa wondering if anyone could explain the following...
              I was looking at maps of the popular vote and I
              noticed that the west US was genberally republican
              except for New Mexico where Clinton took a huge lead,
              and Montana where neither Bush nor Clinton did well.
              the differences were significant.  Also ... what about
              Indiana being so inclined to Bush while all the neighbors
              were Clinton......  thanx =)

                                    Ponte
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton