HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Fri, 31 Jul 1992 07:36:25 PDT
From:         lhdsy1!HOVMB.HOU281.CHEVRON.COM!TKMARC@UUNET.UU.NET
X-To:         uunet!ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu!slovak-l@uunet.UU.NET

>I spoke Mr Husak twice before the invasion of the Soviet army
>and once after the invasion. In spite of the hard prosecution
>
>Jan Szelepcsenyi

I just finished Plevza's "Vzostupy a pady," an interesting, albeit
biased, book about Husak. It didn't discuss why he used to deliver
some of his official speeches in Czech language. I guess what I don't
understand, he was apparently proud to be Slovak, fought for Slovakia,
suffered for it (indirectly) in prison, and was instrumental in
getting the federation. Why would he want to speak Czech, create
monster words like "apr'il," be laughed at by the Czechs, and cussed
at by the Slovaks? Any insights?

--Kamil Marcinka (Internet address: tkmarc@hovmb.ion.chevron.com)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: SLOVAK-L@UBVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"SLOVAK-L@UBVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Tue, 21 Jul 1992 07:43:00 +0100
From:         KUBASKA@CSBBYS51.BITNET
Subject:      Re: SLovaks/Hungarians

Excuse me, I forgot to put down my name in reply to Mr.Pete Tamas and Mr.
Kamil Marcinka. So here it is :
                              Marian Kubaska
                          Banska Bystrica, Czecho-Slovakia
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Acknowledge-To: <VOLAK@CSEARN>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Wed, 29 Jul 1992 16:43:56 MDT
From:         Petr Volak <VOLAK@CSEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      old church slavonic dictionary fund - help ple
X-To:         advise-l@eboub011.BITNET, lantra-l@finhutc.BITNET,
              mideur-l@ubvm.BITNET, slovak-l@ubvm.BITNET

       THE OLD CHURCH SLAVONIC
              DICTIONARY FUND

WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE PART IN COMPLETION OF A UNIQUE WORK
               OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE?

                    WE NEED YOUR HELP!

     For  almost  half  a  century  our  best experts in the
fields of Old Church  Slavonic and literature in cooperation
with  classical philologists,  Germanists, Russian scholars,
theologians and  other specialists have been  working on the
compilation of an academic Dictionary of Old Church Slavonic
(Lexicon linguae palaeoslovenicae, Prague, from 1958).
     This dictionary provides a lexicon of the language into
which  the  Holy  Bible   was  translated  and  thus  became
instrumental in spreading Christianity.  As a result of this
language the Slavs became recognized  as one of the cultured
nations of Europe.
                The dictionary is finished,
          but means for its printing are lacking!
     OLD SLAVS HAD REACHED EUROPE BY THE 9TH CENTURY!
 HELP US TO REMIND EUROPE - AND OURSELVES! - OF THIS FACT.
     More than 2,700 pages  have already been printed. Along
with Old  Church Slavonic vocabulary  there are also  Czech,
Russian, German, Greek, Latin and Hebrew equivalents.

THERE ARE LESS THAN 400 PAGES STILL TO BE PRINTED AND THEY'D
                      COST $ 60,000.
     The type  setting is very  demanding, because different
alphabets must be used -  Cyrillic, Roman, Greek and Hebrew.
Some of the plates already set and ready for printing are in
danger of being broken down.
      Contributions to help completion of printing of
         THE DICTIONARY OF OLD CHURCH SLAVONIC
            can be sent to the accounts below:
1. Foreign currency account - KB Prague: 34833-1183054-021
2. Czechoslovak crown account PRAGOBANK Prague: 638-100/1600

     Contact address: Pavla FOGLOVA
                      Main director of the Fund
                      Polska 50
                      779 00 Olomouc
                      Czechoslovakia

                 Thank you for your help!

Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
From: ttj@doe.carleton.ca (Tomas Janacek)
Subject: hungarians/slovaks
Organization: Dept. of Electronics, Carleton University
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 14:26:46 GMT

Just one more point to the ongoing discussions about the rights and problems
of Hungarians (or others) in communist Slovakia. (I can't tell how is it
now as I do not live there anymore). 

Everybody knows, that a huge percentage of the south/eastern Slovakia
population is claiming HUngarian nationality and also everybody knows
that there were many elementary and high schools where all subjects were
taught in Hungarian, there was a paper printed only in Hungarian, I believe
that they had a reserved time on TV and radio channels (all for taxpayers'
money...). So it is really difficult to talk about the "suppression".

I am not quite sure how this all looked like on the other side of the border
but I suspect it was not a mirror image.
When one was traveling from Czechoslovakia to Hungary (or Poland), one thing
was striking - the proximity of the border was visible as many of commercial
ads, posters etc were either bilingual - or in Hungarian (or Polish) only.
HOwever, once the border was crossed, only unilingual signs were to be spotted.
So this does say something about the nature of hungarian-slovak relations.

Also I recall TV interview with some people of hungarian nationality on
Czechoslovak TV. Although undoubtedly many of them were fluent in Slovak,
it was a rare sight to hear someone speak Slovak, mostly they spoke Hungarian
and the whole interview had to be translated into Slovak. (Even many Quebecois
choose to speak English (even broken English) when interviewed for CBC or other
English media). 

That's all - I do not intend to say that hungarians were pampered (or Slovaks
in HUngary for that matter) - and please spare me of all those stories how
people were rude to you/your friend for suspecting you of being Hungarian.
The same could be said of Czech=Slovaks, Czech/germans,Czech/polish... you name
it. Besides - have you ever been to Quebec City and tried to speak English???


                                       Tomas Janacek

Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 10:42:56 EDT
From:         Henry Kucera <HENRY@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Skvorecky article

>Posted on 28 Jul 1992 at 02:56:26 by BrownVM Mailer (103837)
>
>3. Mr.Slobodnik would step down (former president of Austria was
>lieutenant in Wehrmacht and couldn't enter USA, but austrians respected
>him) in the case he was involved in some unmoral actions.
>4. If we aply american criterion to our politicians, nor Mr. Havel
>would be ellected. But I agree, that there is no place in our policy
>for high communist exponents (Mr.Calfa ,former federal prime minister
>Mr.Dubcek, former head of federal parliament, both prefered by Mr.Havel,
>by the way).
>
>
>Marian Kubaska

  I am no admirer of Mr. Waldheim (former Austrian president banned from the
the US) but comparing him to Slobodnik may be unfair to Waldheim. After all,
he was not in an SS-camp for training like Slobodnik. Volunteering for the
Hlinka guard in 1944 as Slobodnik did strikes me either as stupid (the fascists
had lost the war by then) or as the action of a fanatical ideologue. If none
of Slobodnik's actions are "unmoral" -- to use Mr. Kubaska's word--and if the
Slovak minister of culture (of all things) is a man of such a "character" then
one must only hope that Father Tiso is praying for Slovakia.

  As to the former Communists listed, why skip Mr. Meciar and members of
his cabinet? Selective enumeration a convincing argument does not make.

Regards, H. K.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
From: ttj@doe.carleton.ca (Tomas Janacek)
Subject: SDL - answer requested
Organization: Dept. of Electronics, Carleton University
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 19:31:14 GMT

Dear Mr Kubaska,

I am sorry but I still have not received the answer that would enable me
to see the real nature of teh SDL party which you claim to be non - communist.
May I ask you again to deliver some proofs so that I could feel better
because of "no communists passed to Slovak parliament" (to quote your
recent article).

		Thank you very much
 
                                        Tomas Janacek
                                        Ottawa, Canada
 
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  JNET%"slovak-l@ubvm"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Wed, 29 Jul 1992 12:59:00 N
From:         FALK2399@DS0RUS54.BITNET
Subject:      Veritas vincit!

>>.. hope that Father Tiso is praying for Slovakia.
>Mr. Kucera, leave f. Tiso out of our discussion. What do you know about him?
>What do I know about him?
>Marian Kubaska

        What do we then know about anything?

Regards,

M. Havranek, Stuttgart, FRG
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 20:08:01 EDT
From:         Henry Kucera <HENRY@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Forwarded mail for LISTS.SLOVAK-L

 Paul Mego refers to the practice of Communist "democratic centralism" from
Prague.Ironically, the longest practioner of Communist "democractic centralism"
 by far (20 years) was Gustav Husak, a Slovak. Just one of the ironies of a
 confused history.

    Regards, H.K.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-To: iugate::"SLOVAK-L@UBVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 21:14:44 EST
From:         HAMMERL@UCS.INDIANA.EDU
Subject:      RE: Skvorecky article

I just noticed that the page number of the Skvorecky article was given
as 1.  It should be 11.

Louise Hammer
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: SLOVAK-L@UBVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"SLOVAK-L@UBVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: PHIEZK
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 16:21:00 EST
From:         EUGENE KELLY <PHIEZK@HOFSTRA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: SDL are not communists?

Alas, Louise, I just sent a "positive" review of it to Slovak-L.  I hope
you don't think I'm anti-Slovak too.  I love Slovakia no less, but
if it is wrong, let's put it right.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 09:35:46 EDT
From:         Henry Kucera <HENRY@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Havel

>Posted on 22 Jul 1992 at 08:23:37 by BrownVM Mailer (103837)
>
>............... Why do you think that Mr. Havel should be, a priori, considered
>in Slovakia as a good candidate for president ? Just because he is intellectual
>playwright and humanist ? There are many such persons. Or because he is popular
>in the USA ?
>        I also consider Mr. Havel to be in many respects a remarkable person.
>However, not as a politician and not as president. And I see no reason to see
>something particularly drammatic on the fact, that he was not elected. It's
>simply a political reality. By the way, I would myself think a long time before
>using the example of the Hitler - Stalin pact in connection with anybody from
>the present political scene of Czecho-Slovakia.
>                                        Best regards
>                                                Roman Martonak
>                                                Int. School for Advanced Studie
>                                                Strada Costiera 11
>                                        34014   Italy
>                                                Trieste


  Just a few facts: In the last popular opinion survey, Havel got very high
positive rating in the Czech Republic (75% or more) but, more remarkably,
very good ones in the Slovak Republic (50%). These results were posted on this
list. I don't see any 50% of the votes in the Slovak chamber.

   Secondly, Havel's attitude towards Slovakia is expressed in detail in his
book "Summer Reflections" published in 1991. If you read it, you will probably
agree that by voting against him, the Slovaks have lost one of their best
friends (that is, if they want some kind of "loose association" with the
Czechs, as they keep insisting).

  As to the coalition of the nationalists and the communists, that, too, has
ben discussed extensively on Mideur-L. The conclusion is actually not mine,
it comes from the NY Times, but I most certainly do not disagree.

  Now, surely, it does matter a little what foreigners like us, in the US
especially, think about your country. Most businessmen are pragmatic and some
even calculating but they are, generally, not stupid and they cannot afford to
operate with charitable motives in mind. Their stockholders would not stand
for that. I was simply reporting what I know about the business world.

   And, finally, let me say that when I was in Czechoslovakia in June, I spent
a whole hour listening to Mr. Meciar on Slovak TV--it was a "brain-storming"
session he conducted on a boat anchored in the Danube in Bratislava.
If I were in your boat (no pun intended), I would take Havel any day.

Best regards, H.K.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-To: iugate::"SLOVAK-L@UBVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 15:04:17 EST
From:         HAMMERL@UCS.INDIANA.EDU
Subject:      Re: SDL are not communists?

	Josef Skvorecky had a lengthy article published in yesterday's
New York Times.  It is extremely anti-SLovak.  Would there be any interest
among list participants in reading it?  If so, I will send it over the
weekend.

Louise Hammer
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 16:19:09 MSZ
From:         Jiri Mracek <ZRSN@DS0RUS1I.BITNET>
Subject:      Re. Havel

Mr. Havranek is not on SLOVAK-L. So, I'm forwarding his contribution to
the topic 'Havel' for him.
-----------------------------original message------------------------------
Mr. Kubaska and Martonak's refusals of Mr Havel as a Czechoslovak president
on the Slovak-l are fully respected and appreciated. What is still missing
is a constructive proposal of an alternative candidate who would be accepted
by the both nations of Slovaks and Czechs.

Regards,

M.Havranek, Sturrgart, FRG


Jiri Mracek                     Phone : +49 711 685 4806
                                Fax   : +49 711 682357
Systems Section                 Email : Mracek@rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Computer Center                 Mail  : Allmandring 30
University of Stuttgart                 7000 Stuttgart-80
                                        Germany
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: slovak-l@ubvm.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"slovak-l@ubvm"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 08:08:00 +0100
From:         KUBASKA@CSBBYS51.BITNET
Subject:      survey

A new survey was made by "Institut pre vyskum verejnej mienky, Praha"
in the first half of JULY. There were 1165 people asked : "Whom would
you like to see to be the president of CSFR?"
Results:
   In Czech republic :    V.Havel ...............66%
   In Slovak republic :   V.Havel ...............28% (but the first anyway)

Information according to newspaper "Narodna Obroda 29.VII."

Marian Kubaska
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.slovak-l
Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 12:53:08 PDT
From:         lhdsy1!HOVMB.HOU281.CHEVRON.COM!TKMARC@UUNET.UU.NET
Subject:      Re: Skvorecky's article
X-To:         uunet!ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu!slovak-l@uunet.UU.NET

>I higly appreciate the fact that Mr. Skvorecky dared say quite openly what
>Mr. Klaus never did: that Slovakia has become a burden to the Czech lands.
>Yes, it is time to say the truth to each other. But then, I think, one should
>tell the whole truth and not stop in the midway. I don't agree with
>Mr. Skvorecky's opinion that this is the consequence of the policy of
>Mr. Meciar's party. I think the names are not so important. Meciar, or someone
>else, Havel, or someone else, the situation would be exactly the same.

Like Mr Martonak, I disagree with Mr Skvorecky in that Slovakia became a
burden because of Meciar personally; he received 37% of the Slovak vote
which signifies that problem is elsewhere--he's just one of the symptoms.

>Slovakia became a burden for the Czech lands after being its colony for more
>than 70 years. It became a burden in the moment when it decided not to be
>what Prague would have liked it to be.
>
>                                Best regards
>                                                Roman Martonak.

Slovakia became a burden when it started moving in a direction which is
opposite to where the Czech lands want
to go. No comment on the "colony" part--we've had plenty of this discussion.

--Kamil Marcinka (Internet address: tkmarc@hovmb.ion.chevron.com)
From: ERIC@SEARN.BITNET (Eric Thomas)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Subject: Incorrect ':oldnode.'/':newnode.' tags in VERS9209
Date: 31 Jul 92 15:03:50 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

As expected, the  first version of BITEARN NODES to  contain the new tags
specifies them incorrectly, so here  is the unprofessional note mentioned
in  my last  message.  Fortunately, nobody  is using  these  tags yet  in
production.

>> show node irishvm/*node.
>Information from the VERS9209 BITEARN NODES file:
>
>:node.IRISHVM :oldnode.IRISHVM.PCL.ND.EDU :newnode.IRISHVM.DCRL.ND.EDU

':oldnode.'  must be  an  NJE node.  If you  are  renaming your  Internet
address from  host1.EDU to  host2.EDU, you should  use Internet  tools to
take care of it.

':oldnode.X' and ':newnode.Y'  cannot appear in the same  entry, it makes
no sense. The  former says that this  is the new, permanent  entry of the
node which used to  be called X. The latter says that  this node is about
to be deleted and the new name is Y.

As  it stands  now, IRISHVM  users  will be  virtually disconnected  from
BITNET, as far  as LISTSERV is concerned, the day  1.7d is released. When
they  order a  program  from LISTSERV,  it  will be  sent  via mail  (and
probably unusable).  The operation of LISTSERV@IRISHVM  will be impacted,
since it will appear to send  requests from its Internet address. I might
have had to remove it from PEERS NAMES if I had released 1.7d.

In other  words, bravo; I'm glad  I spent time explaining  how these tags
should  be used,  and stressing  the  importance of  checking and  double
checking them before injecting them into BITEARN NODES.

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 11:00:26 CET
From:         Hans-Ulrich Giese <U001212@HEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      add-on for 9209
Comments: To: xmailer@HEARN.BITNET

i just received a complaint about one of the 'new' nodenames :
     -- MVSESA
i agree, that this nodename isn't a good choice, but currently we don't
have any list of names which are (or should be) protected. so i can
only add this node to the 9209 update.

-ulrich-
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Brasil
X-Acknowledge-To: <NAD@BRUFMG>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 09:54:11 BSC
From:         "Renato Baumgratz Viotti" <NAD@BRUFMG.BITNET>
Subject:      Help on deleting a node

Here at Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, we have two nodes on
BITNET (BRUFMG and BRUFMGEE). We will delete node BRUFMGEE and all user's
at this node will migrate to BRUFMG.
If you have any sugestions to facilitate my job I will apreciate.
I know the forms to delete the node.
Thanks in advance.

                         Renato Baumgratz Viotti

+------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
| Laboratorio de Computacao Cientifica           |                          |
| Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais           |   NAD@BRUFMG.BITNET      |
| Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627 - Pampulha            |   NAD@VM1.LCC.UFMG.BR    |
| Predio do Depto. de Fisica - Salas 103 e 123   | Telef.: +55 31 441-1881  |
| Caixa Postal 702                               | Telex: +55 31 2308       |
| 30161 - Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais - Brasil | Fax: +55 31 448-1372     |
+------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 07:47:25 EST
From:         Paul Ribeiro <ACAD8012@RYEVM.RYERSON.CA>
Subject:      Re: new/del nodes for 9209

Hmm,
does anyone know where "CENVM" is? I've been getting "LIST GLOBAL"
requests sent to my Listserv from that site but since it's not
in the tables...it bounces back to me.
/Paul
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Arnold Consulting
X-VMS-To: IN%"nodmgt-l@uga.cc.uga.edu"
X-VMS-Cc: IN%"glover@tusk.bitnet",ARNOLD
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 16:03:55 -0400
From:         "Stephen L. Arnold" <ARNOLD@EISNER.DECUS.ORG>
Subject:      Corruption of routing tables?
Comments: To: nodmgt-l@uga.cc.uga.edu
Comments: cc: glover@tusk.BITNET

I set up the node TUSKADA for my client, Tuskegee University, to accept
files in VMSDUMP, NETDATA, PUNCH, PRINT, and DISK DUMP formats, in order
of preference, by submitting this job to UPDATE@BITNIC:

modify node TUSKADA
:NODEDESC.Tuskegee University - Computer Services
:MACHINE.Digital VAX-11/780
:SYSTEM.VMS
:MSGS.*delete*
:FFORMAT.VD ND PU PR DD
:FCLASS.*delete*
:INTERNET.*delete*
:SERVERS1.MAILER@TUSK(MAIL,,,,P_POSTMAST)
:P_UPOSTMAS.*delete*
:LINKS1.AUDUCVAX TUSK(P,999M)
:NETOP.*delete*
:TECHINFO.*delete*
:USERADM.*delete*
*
*---------- Step 2 processed -- No errors found ------------

However, the routing tables they received for July have some of this
data "leaking" into them.  The first line is:

PU PR DD ^@

(where ^@ represents a NUL, hex 00).

It appears that some software is using the :FFORMAT tag to determine the
format of routing tables, but is not properly handling multiple values.
(I expect NETSERV to reject VD and use ND instead).

The obvious workaround is to edit the tables to delete the bogus first
line.

Has anyone else seen this problem?

Would the maintainer of the software involved look into fixing this?

Thanks for any light you can shed on this!

Regards,
"Steve"   Stephen L. Arnold, Ph.D., Principal, Arnold Consulting
          Multivendor Networks and Distributed Applications
Address   4138 Iroquois Drive, Madison, Wisconsin  53711-3701  U.S.A.
Telephone +1 (608) 238-7835             Pager +1 (608) 277-4053
Internet  Arnold@Eisner.DECUS.Org       BITNET  ARNOLD@WISCPSL
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 10:41:49 CET
From:         Hans-Ulrich Giese <U001212@HEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      new/del nodes for 9209
Comments: To: xmailer@HEARN.BITNET

here comes the list of new/del nodes for 9209 :

new nodes:

ESNET    0996 US BITNET
MSOESA   1271 US BITNET
MVSESA   1349 US BITNET
NIHNLM   1419 US BITNET
NIHNLM3C 1476 US BITNET
OHSTPW   1496 US BITNET
UFCC     1554 US BITNET
UFOAK    1594 US BITNET
UHVMESA  1751 US BITNET
UICPH1   1901 US BITNET
UICWS    1964 US BITNET
JPNSUT32 2020 JP CAREN
ALIJKU12 0501 AT EARN
CSPUNI13 0576 CS EARN
FRILL50  0254 FR EARN
FRUAGG11 0002 FR EARN
HUKLTE51 0511 HU EARN
ICRS4VM  0485 IT EARN

delete nodes:
AKRON    BINGVAXC  BUASTA    CTSTATEU  EALSOL51  EMDUAHM1  FHCRCVM
HHEOUH54 HUTSUR51  KUIKSC00  KUKISR00  KUKUN00   LUSUN     RMC
UMIAMVS  UORHBV
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU