From: chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney)
Subject: Re: Why we go for non-black women:
Organization: California State University Sacramento
Distribution: world 
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 16:24:29 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.205832.1472@newton.ccs.tuns.ca> lashlepi@newton.ccs.tuns.ca (Phillip Lashley) writes:
>In article <1993Jan4.224113.7074@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan4.190708.8750@newton.ccs.tuns.ca> lashlepi@newton.ccs.tuns.ca (Phillip Lashley) writes:
>>>In article <1993Jan1.155419.25716@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>>>>
>>>
>>>*MUCH* stuff deleted. It is too early in the year to tire my soul with attempting to find any reason in this post. (perhaaps im missing something)
>  *MUCH MORE* stuff deleted
>sorr, deleted one line too many. Any wayy chaney@nextnet.etc is intrested in:
>>1) Intolerant militant sisters. 
>>2) If not them, then at least an intolerant brother. 
>>3) If not them, then at least some riff-raff out there that
>>thinks they're hot enough to put the opposition down. 
>>
>In his humble opinion, and i quote:
>>You look like a weak #2. No challenge..
>>
>Here we go again,
>perhaps it sould be done as with the other guy phil stromer or who have you ... ignore. But others still advocate trying to make silk purse from the skin of swine. i will try.
>Perple, no mater what race, creed etc, deserve some minimum level of respect. (Even racists, unfortunately). lack of this for others, particularily Black women, (not exactly P.C but hey)is perhaps indicative of a certain lack of respect foryourself. i will hope (and pray) that your current S.O can continue to putup with you, despite your short somings. (i cant resist this, probaly literall)
>Now. read the other replies, since one individual does some nice work about your lack of self esteem. Find some, chill a little

Lack of self-esteem? Come on, do you really believe that? I patched up
my self-esteem with regards to race and attitude, when I decided to go
ahead and date who I wanted to. I feel a whole lot better knowing I
can challenge people to explain what gives them the power to punish
blacks for marrying interracially, and then taking that power from
them. It will make me feel a LOT better knowing that people read this
and come back later, when they feel the pressure to dump their loved
one for a member of their own race, and simply resist. 

The more people who resist this forced conformity, the better I feel about
it. That does not mean ALL blacks should marry interracially - it
means that no one should be confined to marry one race of people
because some unseen, self-appointed authority so decrees.  


>Thats it. You join my kill list.

Translation: You flee the scene. 

>no sig follows

No coherent argument precedes. 
 

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
  --Steve Chaney: Founder, Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.5--
  USENET Warlord / IRC Channel Owner / Accounts WorldWide / Home Login!
	      (Whooboy that means LOTSA time for all this?)
                  The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS. 
Xref: sparky soc.culture.african.american:13501 soc.culture.asian.american:11324