HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: steve@thelake.mn.org (Steve Yelvington)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: C for the ST
Date: 14 Apr 92 15:33:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: thelake.A1411389582

[In article <1992Apr13.233321.10308@umbc3.umbc.edu>,
     cs331109@umbc5.umbc.edu (cs331109) writes ... ]

 > I disagree that you can't go wrong with modern C compilers.  I've 
 > tried many of the ST compilers and I am yet to find ONE that 
 > will compile ANSI standard source code.  I'm learning C in school,
 > and I use a UNIX compiler.  I've tried Mark WIlliams, Lightspeed C, 
 > Madmax c (or whatever), and am currently trying to get GNU C 
 > and/or Szobon C to work.  If anyone DOES know of an ANSI/UNIX 
 > c compiler please let me know what it is.

Neither Mark Williams, Megamax Laser C, nor Sozobon C are modern
commercial compilers. They do not claim conformance to the ANSI
standard. All were created before the ANSI standard was completed.
They are based on the K&R description of the C programming language
and although each incorporates some extensions to Classic C, none of
them supports function prototypes. Sozobon 1.33i, which is free,
seems to go farther in the direction of the standard than the others,
but you still will need to rewrite prototypes and new-style function
argument definitions in order for it to work. Lightspeed does not, to
my knowledge, produce a C compiler for the Atari ST.

GNU C (GCC) does support function prototypes and does conform to the
ANSI standard if you use the documented compiler switches.

Lattice C 5.0, Turbo/Pure C and Prospero C attempt to conform to the
ANSI standard. I think there may be some odd cases in which they
might trip over a detail, but on the whole they're reliable for
processing ANSI C code.

(Please fix the word wrap on your editor. Your original was entered
all on one line. Usenet messages should be < 80 columns wide.)

 ---
 Steve Yelvington              Marine on St. Croix, Minnesota, USA 
 steve@thelake.mn.org          umn-cs!thelake!steve
From: HAC041@DJUKFA11.BITNET (Konrad Hinsen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: CompoScript?
Date: 6 Apr 92 09:59:21 GMT
Organization: KFA  Forschungszentrum Juelich

In article <1992Apr6.022959.12945@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>,
as666@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jonathan Roy) says:
>
>I'm heard of a new, Ultrascript type program called CompoScript.
>It's from Germany and is supposed to be very slick. Anyone know
>how much it costs, or if there is a demo? Thanks.

There is no demo version because licensing agreements do not permit
that (what would you do with a demo version without fonts?).
The recommended price is DM 548 in Germany, for prices in other
countries ask the local distributor (which for the US is Goldleaf).

Konrad Hinsen (hac041@zam001.zam.kfa-juelich.de)
From: ziggy@grafted.UUCP (anthony lewis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Stripped Mega ST $$
Date: 14 Apr 92 00:47:51 GMT
Organization: GRAFTED, Central Indiana's Usenet BBS 317-881-4369


        Does anyone know where and $ of a stripped Mega St, ( no HD or 
RAM ). I already have these and would hate to buy 'extras'...
                                        Ziggy.

--
anthony lewis
The Grafted Branch BBS
317-881-4369
internet: ziggy@grafted.UUCP
uucp: ..!uunet!grafted.UUCP!ziggy
 = = Grafted Branch BBS (317) 889-6997 2 Gig on-line = =
From: davidli@lapis.labmed.umn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Gemulator
Date: 10 Apr 92 14:12:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: lapis.1992Apr10.141211.1
Organization: Flying Taoist Graphics

In article <12460@umd5.umd.edu>, adhir@cygnus.umd.edu (Alok Dhir) writes:
> This is for all you ST fanatics that keep bringing up PC Ditto.

I'm not an ST fanatic, but I'd like to address a few misconceptions here...

>  PC Ditto ... runs at about 10% the speed of an IBM XT,

In non-graphics-intensive situations, I would say that it was more like 60%
the speed of an IBM XT.

> and is unusable in just about all respects other
> than listing directories.

Uses:

Word processing		(PC Write)
Database management	(PC File)
Games playing		(just about any non-musical PD text-oriented game)
Graphics conversion	(a bit slow, perhaps, but there aren't any PCX-
			 to-IMG translators written for the ST publicly
			 available)

>  It would probably be alot faster on a TT or
> Falcon or whatever, but unfortunately it is no longer supported, and will
> not run on anything above Tos 1.2 or so.

It runs fine on my Mega ST under TOS 1.4.

> Gemulator, on the other hand, is an emulator that will let you run ST
> stuff on a pretty average PC compatible (386 and better) at a very
> usable speed.

A '386 PC is still not 'pretty average', given that the majority of
machines in use today are still XT/AT clones.  The catalog houses are STILL
selling large quantities of '286 machines!
 
> ATonce and other card based PC emulators are junk.  They limit you to
> a 286 or 386sx processor, which people have pointed out are about as
> useful as their STE :)

There's nothing wrong with a 286/386sx processor.  One might as well label
all IBM-PC clones 'junk' because they don't have a '386dx or '486 processor.
Of course, if you write software which can =only= be used on a '386dx or '486,
you're going to starve to death while all of the 'junk' developers
are making money.  Even Microsoft writes a version of Windows for the AT
clones.

-- 

David Paschall-Zimbel		davidli@simvax.labmed.umn.edu

"It was discovered that unity was plural and at minimum sixfold."
	-- R. Buckminster Fuller
From: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov (John Hutchinson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: ST into PC case
Date: 17 Apr 92 14:48:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: newshost.1992Apr17.144801.14399
Reply-To: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory

In article 13217@watserv1.waterloo.edu, ec333way@steam.uwaterloo.ca (Winter92
BEACON ec333 account) writes:
>I am planning to buy an SST soon (with spectre). I am therefore thinking of
>moving my ST into a PC case. I have seen some people mention they have done
>this. Did you use a desktop case or a tower case? 

You can do either, it's up to you.  You can buy a complete kit from an outfit
called Tech-Specialties, 909 Crosstimbers Street, Houston, TX 77022, phone
(713) 691-4527.  They can even sell you a kit that allows you to put BOTH an
ST and a PC motherboard in the same tower case!  Pretty trick, eh?  One caution
however... if you intend to run a Spectre cartridge, make sure you will have
access to the ST`s cartridge socket once you've put it in a PC case!

>Did you move a normal ST or a Mega?

You can move either into a PC case but the SST (for now) is designed only for
the Mega version.  Of course, I think that's only because the Mega is the
only ST with enough room to accomodate the largeish SST board so if you put an
ST motherboard inside a PC case, that requirement goes away, I would think.

>Should I buy a used mega (ie would it make things easier)?

It's just as easy to remove the screws from a used mega case as a new one.
Tell me where you would find a _new_ MegaST now anyway??? (not a MegaSTe).

Sounds to me like you ought to contact Gadgets and talk to them direct before
spending large amounts of cash.  Their number is 303-791-6098.  Their phone is
often busy, though, so I recommend you contact them via fax at 303-791-0253.
---
___________________________ John "HUTCH" Hutchinson _________________________
___________ Chief Cook & Bottle Washer - Fair Dinkum Technologies ___________
________________ "No worries, mate... it's from Fair Dinkum!" _______________
____________ email: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov   GEnie: FAIR-DINKUM _____________
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
From: bgilbert@cs.washington.edu (Benjamin Gilbert)
Subject: TT/VME graphics tidbit...
Summary: ACE '92 cool stuff
Keywords: TT VME Cybercube graphics CyReL Sunrise
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 92 19:15:34 GMT

Hey, just thought some people might like to see this blurb from the new Z-net
(it's not too long, I couldn't resist... :-)


     | (((((((( |         Z*Net International Atari Online Magazine
     |      ((  |         -----------------------------------------
     |    ((    |         April 10, 1992               Issue #92-15

     ======================================================================
     * ACE '92 EXCLUSIVE EYEWITNESS REPORT                 by David Pischke
     ======================================================================
     .
     .
     .
     Cybercube Research Limited
     Cybercube of Thornhill, Ont. was there with the CyReL Sunrise M16-1280
     graphics card.  The CyReL Sunrise is a VMEbus card that gives not only
     stunning graphics, but 20Mbit/s networking as well.  The CyReL Sunrise
     can display 32-bit graphics in resolutions up to 2048x1024 -- non-
     interlaced.  Resolutions are totally programmable from 256x200 to 2048x
     1024 and Refresh rates range from 50Hz to 220Hz.

     The CyReL Sunrise was shown running on a TT; the graphics were
     impressive, to say the least.
     .
     .
     .


All I can say is : I WANT ONE!!!!

Cheers,

Ben

*************************************************************************
Ben Gilbert					| | |	ST   Mega ST
bgilbert@cs.washington.edu			| | |	STe  Mega STe
tymbrimi@u.washington.edu		       /  |  \	TT <-- buy one :)
*************************************************************************


From: goo@hpindda.cup.hp.com (Michael Goo)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 21:24:12 GMT
Subject: Re: Can I send e-mail to pay services?
Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st

odonnj@jec325.its.rpi.edu (James Robert O'Donnell Jr.) writes...

>Is it possible to send e-mail from the net (internet, bitnet, whatevernet) to
>any of the pay services (GEnie, CompuServe, etc.)? I ask because a good friend

I don't know about any of the others, but you can send mail to CompuServe
users from the internet.  Their email address would look something like:

     <userid>@???.compuserve.com

I would assume that the reverse is true as well.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Goo                   |
Hewlett-Packard               | "I never try to cover my ass...
Information Networks Division |   but I certainly support your right to do so!"
19420 Homestead Road  MS 43LT |
Cupertino, CA 95014-9974      |
goo@hpinddh.cup.hp.com        |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: pal@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de (Peter Loibl)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: C for the ST
Date: 13 Apr 92 15:09:11 GMT

krschimm@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu writes:

>Is there a public domain C compile for the ST
>and what is the best C compiler for the st?

1. There is GNU-C (gcc, g++) for the Atari around. It is very good
   and on most machines available. The lastest version I have seen
   for the Atari was 1.40, whereas the version 2.00 is already 
   released. I don't know from where you can ftp version 2.00.
   1.40 is available in atari.umich.edu

2. The best C-Compiler I know is Pure-C (former Turbo-C).

Peter
pal@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de
From: moon!cyberden!system@well.sf.ca.us
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: GEMULATOR 
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 92 18:38:19 PDT
Organization: Indescribable Creations

ljdickey@watmath.waterloo.edu (L. J. Dickey) writes:
> and emulates an Atari ST.  Derek Michoka was there with a 33 MHz clone
> runs the Gemulator at about 85% of the speed (my timings) of an 8 MHz
> ST.  One surprise for me was that the Gemulator can run inside window

I've been seeing this... a 486/33 Mhz at 85% efficency? If GEMulator
can't run at 200% on a 386/33, I would't touch it. Seems to be a waste... 
You would need a 50Mhz 486 just to achieve something worth while...
Who cares... Get the real thing for cheap these days... I personally 
would love a GEMulator but have an ST and wouldn't bother elsewise with 
85% being the best I can look forward to on my 386/40
<X>orcist

__________________________________________________________________________
   |       /         |\
   | H E   \ Y B E R |/ E N       [ moon!cyberden!system@well.sf.ca.us ]
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
From: tbrown@tortoise.cis.ohio-state.edu (Ted Brown)
Subject: Re: ACE'92 show: Report
Organization: The Ohio State University, Department of Computer and Information Science
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 05:40:27 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.045538.1530@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> bl692@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dan Ackerman II) writes:
>
>Dear Mr. Dhir,
>
>	Question how in the He** are you supposed to run Spectre
>without the Spectre Cartridge (or more appropriately the Mac
>Roms it contains)?  Maybe run the pirate file versions of the Mac
>Roms like Darryl Microsofts running a pirate version of TOS?
>

This does bring up the question.  Just *how* does/would Gemulator
run Spectre?  I think running Spectre without the Spectre cart just
might be against Dave Small's wishes.  Can you even buy a copy of 
Spectre without buying the cart?

Also note that reading the MacRoms into memory is illegal unless you do it
*every* time you start the emulator.  Copying them do disk and leaving the
ROMs on the shelf is not legal (as I understand it).

Was the demo of Gemulator running off a TOS board?  If not, *that* is illegal.

It won't run video at ST speeds no matter what speed the chip is at unless
maybe you have an EISA bus (which those cheap clones arent) or its one of
the new direct mapped video models which start at $5,499 for a base line
Dell.  And you *can't* upgade to one, it on the board not the bus.

Pay lots of money, have to get a board to hold TOS (and waste a slot), not
run MIDI aps, have slow video, and still have performance under question.
And I don't expect it to be able to *legally* able to run Spectre.  That's just
marketing bullsh** for all I know till I hear how they will do it.

I still don't get it!  Who'd buy Gemulator, and if someone did, should they
be commited?

Ted Brown




Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
From: aq115@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robert C Glover)
Subject: Re: Continuous .MOD player?
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 22:12:42 GMT


Well, unffortunately, I don't know of any that will load MODs
from a user-defined list (yet), but I do know of one that runs as
an accessory and it plays MODs on an STE in the BACKGROUND.  And
very nicely at that.  It has the best sound quality of any ACC
MOD player I've found -- comparable to CD-Player.  I haev it
playing right now as I'm typing this.
 
It's called Paula.ACC, but the real name is Pascal's Amiga-MOD
Player.  It's not on the internet (yet), but I will attempt to
post it there.  I quit upload to it because my stuff never got
posted.
 
When Jukebox 1.3 comes out, it will offer a shuffle mode, and
should be more stable, perhaps enough to overthrow Paula.  Right
now, at version 1.2, it's a little flakey, and only works well
on a machine that's 16 MHz or greater.
 
Rob
-- 
| Robert Glover                               GEnie:  R.GLOVER3 |
| Internet:           rg@turing.acs.virginia.edu                |
| Cleveland Freenet:  aq115@cleveland.freenet.edu               |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
From: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov (John Hutchinson)
Subject: Re: does atari staff read usenet?
Reply-To: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 16:55:25 GMT

In article 5440177@hplsla.hp.com, andyc@hplsla.hp.com (Andy Cassino) writes:
>
>Well, they read and respond to people in the Atari ST Roundtable in GEnie,
>which, by my estimation, has three or four orders of magnitude more
>participation than this notesgroup. It's also where most of the commercial
>(U.S.) developers can be found, if they can be found on an electronic 
>media. 

Well, there is at least one more Atari software developer that frequents this notesgroup... me!

-Hutch-
Fair Dinkum Technologies
From: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov (John Hutchinson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: TOS 2.06 Upgrade in ST, Easy??
Date: 13 Apr 92 22:24:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: newshost.1992Apr13.222401.9138
Reply-To: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory

I haven't installed a TEC board but I've seen them.  My best advice is that if you have any questions about installation, you should call CodeHead Technologies directly and they'll give you the straight scoop... 213-386-5735 or FAX 213-386-5789.

From what I've heard, it's a _very_ straightforward installation, anyway.

Tell 'em "Hutch" sent ya <grin>,

-Hutch-
Fair Dinkum Technologies
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.atari.st.tech
From: Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Subject: Re: Where can one get a new mouse quickly?
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 01:31:34 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.104420.1@galluk> CADS_COLE@galluk (Kevin Cole; Washington DC) writes:
> Greetings.
> 
> We've got an ST with a mouse that appears to be on it's last legs.  (In 
> particular, it seems to be growing less and less sensative to clicks and 
> double-clicks.)  We needs a new mouse before a concert to be given April 24.  I
> called the only local dealer listed in the phone book, and was told that they
> only had rebuilt mice (for $42.00) and that ordering a new one would take a
> month.  Not good enough.  What's the *FASTEST* way to get a reasonably priced
> ($60 sounds reasonable to me), decent mouse to Washington, DC?  Any good
> sources? 
>  ========== U.S. Mail =============================== E-Mail =================
>  Kevin Cole      <Flatline>           |  Bitnet: CADS_COLE@GALLUA.BITNET
>  Gallaudet Research Institute  (GRI)  |  Internet: KJCOLE@GALLUX.GALLAUDET.EDU
>  Washington, D.C.  20002-3625         |  UUCP: ...!psuvax!gallua.bitnet!kjcole
>  (202) 651-5575  x4592                |  The WELL:   kjcole

I tried to E-Mail you but your path is incorrect..

Try a Golden Image mouse, they cost here some $50/60 nz, should cost
over there some $25us, they use micro-switches..

The later ones have a switch for Atari/Amiga, so try a Amiga shop..

I use a early Amiga one with 2 wires changed around.
-- 
***  Roger W. Sheppard      *      Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz  ***
***  85 Donovan Rd        *    *   GEnie.  R.SHEPPARD5               ***
***  Kapiti                        At least I don't Flicker,         ***
***  New Zealand..          *      not like a dying light globe      ***
From: aq115@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robert C Glover)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: mega ste price
Date: 9 Apr 92 17:39:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: usenet.1992Apr9.173956.7636
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)


A common misconception when it comes to certain machines (the ST,
Mac, and Amiga come to mind) is that because a machine doesn't have
a quadrillion software titles out for it, like the PC, it's not
worth having.
 
I think I should note that it's not the NUMBER of titles available, but
rather the QUALITY of the titles available.  How much PC software is
truly easy to use, has excellent features, frequent upgrades, is
reasonably priced, and is current?  Only the most recent, I'm sure.
Only since Windows 3 came out have truly exceptional programs become
available.  And many of them cost an awful lot of money.
 
There are some really fantastic programs avilable for the ST.  For
example:  Avant Vector, DynaCAD, Pagestream, Calamus, Arabesque Professional,
MegaPaint Professional, Didot Professional, NeoDesk, STalker 3.0, Flash
II, Mega-Check, and many, many others.  There are programs out there to
do almost anything you want.  They're all extremely easy to use, because
the ST was designed wtih a windowing environment in mind, not like the PC,
which is a glorified text processor, and still suffers from memory expansion
limitations, despite the new features of DOS 5.0.
 
The point I'm making, in case you haven't figured it out yet, is that
sheer numbers don't always count.  Quality counts.
 
Rob
-- 
| Robert Glover                               GEnie:  R.GLOVER3 |
| Internet:           rg@turing.acs.virginia.edu                |
| Cleveland Freenet:  aq115@cleveland.freenet.edu               |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: healy@cod.NOSC.MIL (Mike Healy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Hey Gregory! (RE: Atoyi Falcon)
Date: 9 Apr 92 03:08:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: cod.3751
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego


Best just to ignore the flames and they'll die down more quickly. This is
a periodic occurrence that has something to do with the Amigoids'
religious rituals.

Mike Healy

healy@cod.nosc.mil

I had a .sig virus, but it died
From: cummins@a.cs.okstate.edu (CUMMINS JOHN WILLI)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Tiny Turbo and IBM software emulator question
Keywords: Tiny Turbo
Date: 8 Apr 92 21:07:24 GMT
Organization: Oklahoma State University, Computer Science, Stillwater

Software emulation I'm aware of (pcditto 3.01) doesn't work on
anything beyond a 68000.  But then if Spectre works, and softPC in Mac mode
works...  You'd have something!

Are there any newer/improved software emulaters beyond pcditto 3.01?
If so... can you say how they're improved?  Functionally, I found
PCDitto 3.01 Very Good... but if it won't work on my NEW Atari... I need
something new, preferably software.

jc
From: ziggy@grafted.UUCP (anthony lewis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: GEMulator
Date: 11 Apr 92 03:15:40 GMT
Organization: GRAFTED, Central Indiana's Usenet BBS 317-881-4369

aq115@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robert C Glover) writes:

> 
> I don't see much point in GEMulator.  I mean, for the cost of
> the board, plus the TOS ROMs for it, you can buy a used ST
> anyway.  If you want to run ST stuff faster, get an acclerator
> for the machine.  The reason the screen update is so slow on PC's
> is because of their inferior technology to the ST, Mac, and Amiga.
> PC's are junk.  Period.  So what if they have ten times as much
> software.  All but the latest is pretty lacking in quality, and
> even the newest stuff is ages behind the best stuff for the ST.
> Look at Pagestream, Calamus, DynaCAD, Avant Vector, etc.
>  
        Come on now, the PC's are NOT junk, only MSDOS.... I also love
my ( Dead ) ST, but the reality is that my business uses PC's, and it
would be nice to have a ST at work, as well as in a window... If only
the source for GEMulator would be realesed so someone could port it to
XWindows.....

        Also, It it nice that it has been seen in Canada, but where can 
I get it here in the mid west??????? 

                                        Ziggy.


--
anthony lewis
The Grafted Branch BBS
317-881-4369
internet: ziggy@grafted.UUCP
uucp: ..!uunet!grafted.UUCP!ziggy
    -= newsfeeds available, contact robert@towers.rn.com =-
From: adhir@cygnus.umd.edu (Alok Dhir)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: ACE'92 show: Report
Date: 11 Apr 92 18:31:42 GMT
Organization: /etc/organization

>Because you not only get REAL applications (Windows, OS/2, DOS) but you get 

Apparently, this line has caused quite a bit of confusion for a number
of ST fanatics.  What I mean by putting '(Windows, OS/2, DOS)' after 
applications is 'Windows applications, OS/2 applications, DOS applications'.
E.G. Apps that run under Windows, OS/2, and Dos.  Sorry about all the 
confusion this caused.  But it brings up a good point, all you people
that answered this message laughing about that fact that I called these
things applications thinking it was making your point.  On the other hand,
it made YOU look ignorant.  There are PLENTY of GREAT apps available on
the PC platform...MANY more than are available on the ST...INCLUDING games.

>Ok, you go pay couple of hundred for Gumlulator, I pay couple of hundred
>for new 16 MHZ Falcon so we are BOTH happy

OK, I go buy Gemulator, you go buy Falcon.  Than we BOTH be HAPPY! (Image
of jungleman dancing around fire).

(sorry, I just couldn't resist).

						- Al
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st