HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: KENKAHN@PKSMRVM.VNET.IBM.COM (Kenneth A. Kahn)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 18:04:00 EST
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: How to link programs which do not switch to full screen ?
Organization: Staff of IBM Fellow - IBM Personal/370
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0
X-X-From: KENKAHN@PKSMRVM.VNET.IBM.COM (Ken Kahn)

In <1992Dec22.193053.12880@cs.tu-berlin.de> Ernst Kloecker writes:
>Hi,
>
>I am using Microsoft C 6.00 on OS/2 1.32. Whenever I link a text mode OS/2
>program, it switches to full screen after being started. I assume I am linking
>with the wrong libraries.
>
>Which library do I have to link to make my program run in an ordinary OS/2
>window ?
>

You need to make your program Window Compatible.  To do this, in your linker
.DEF file add the following line

  NAME  progname  WINDOWCOMPAT

This will allow your program to run either full screen or in a VIO Window.
From: os2man@panix.com (Larry Salomon Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: CSet/2 vs. Watcom C?
Date: 31 Dec 92 15:16:13 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC

In <1992Dec30.222721.29697@samba.oit.unc.edu> Brandon.Vanevery@launchpad.unc.edu (Brandon Vanevery) writes:

>Which compiler is "better" for OS/2 programming?  Why?  Is there even any
>contest?

We've tried both and I prefer C Set/2.  We had problems getting the Watcom
debugger (WVIDEO) to work and Tech Support wasn't able to help much.

Cheers,
Q
-- 
"If you choose not to decide, you  | "My other body is in the shop" - seen
 still have made a choice" - Rush  |  on a T-shirt
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: leonp@cs.kun.nl (Leon Pillich)
Subject: Which product for programming?
Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 20:30:04 GMT

 Hello everybody,

 I'm considering programming for intel-based pc's in the
 near future.
 I do not know yet whether I will program for os2/2.0
 or for windows 3.1.
 I will be doing this programming to gain experience on
 such systems, since up to know I have mainly programmed
 unix systems, e.g. Sun sparc-stations with X-Windows/
 Open Look Interface Toolkit and RS6000 with 
 X-Windows/OSF-Motif. Since I am currently unemployed I do 
 have some time to gain experience.
 
 Which programming language/environment do you recommend?
 (I prefer C/C++, Pascal or Modula2/3.)
 Are there Borland products for OS2/2.0?

 Thnx, for any info

Leon Pillich
University of Nijmegen, Holland
email: leonp@cs.kun.nl
-------------------------------------------------------------
 Life is what's happening when you're making other plans ...
                                      John Lennon
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 14:18:57 EST
From: H. Choe <HXC6@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: # of File Handles?

Hi.  I want to open a bunch of files simultaneously in my fortran
(Watcom F77/386) program.  Here are questions:
(1)  What is the default number of files handles?
(2)  How to set the number of file handles?  (Is there something
     similar to FILES=xx [in config.sys for dos] for OS/2?)  Or,
     do I misunderstand something?
Thanks.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: bpowell@excalibur.osc.edu (Brian Powell)
Subject: Re: Online help, API reference
Organization: The Ohio Supercomputer Center
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:10:13 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.161409.23719@watson.ibm.com> cnadler@vnet.ibm.com (Cliff Nadler) writes:
: I was actually looking for Vio calls, but as another poster has already
: noted, these (along with Mou and Kbd) are missing (which is a real bitch).

On CompuServe, in the OS2SUP (OS/2 Support) forum, an IBM'er uploaded
the full Kbd/Vio/Mou view'able documentation from OS/2 1.3 for
downloading.  I got it and it seems to be pretty complete...

-- Brian

o------------------------The Ohio Supercomputer Center------------------------o
|  Brian S. Powell                                           bpowell@osc.edu  |
o------------------------"My other computer is a CRAY"------------------------o
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.networking
From: rickr@vti.com (Rick Rodman)
Subject: NetBIOS from virtual DOS/WINOS2
Keywords: netbios, novell, netware, es
Organization: Virtual Technologies Inc.
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 03:21:02 GMT

Generally, I have everything working fine with Arcnet and Token Ring
with Novell's requester and Extended Services.

There is one problem, however.

If I use IBM's NetBIOS, that is to say, don't put in the BINDINGS=NETBIOS$
and ADAPTER0= etc. stuff, on the Token Ring system it is possible for me
to access the Extended Services database from remote clients and from
DOS/WIN programs on the *same* machine.

However, once I change to Novell, it is no longer possible to access the
database on the *same* machine, although the remote clients still work
OK (with Novell's NETBIOS instead of the LSP, of course).

I'm not happy with this because neither LSP nor ODINSUP support Arcnet.
Any ideas?  My conclusion is that something is wrong with Novell's
NetBIOS that it doesn't allow local clients.



-- 

Rick Rodman      uunet!virtech!rickr	Manassas, VA
"This government is the biggest fraud in the history of the industrialized
Western world.  There isn't any Western democracy that does so little for its
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: Doug_Smith@Novell.COM (J. Douglas Smith)
Subject: CTHREAD Port?
Organization: Novell, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 21:41:34 GMT

Does anoyone know of a CTHREAD port for OS/2 2.0?



------------------------------------
Doug Smith
UNIX Desktop Group
Novell DSG

jdsmith@bugs.npd.provo.novell.com
From: I18BC@CUNYVM.BITNET (CUNY/Spartacus)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: PL/1 Compiler for OS/2?
Date: 27 Dec 92 15:35:42 GMT
Organization: City University of New York/ University Computer Center

In article <1992Dec25.144744.3319@netcom.com>, feustel@netcom.com (David
Feustel) says:
>
>Call Sherri Smith (IBM) at 1-800-426-3346.
>--
>Dave Feustel N9MYI <feustel@netcom.com>
>

  Thanks Dave.  I appreciate it.

-------
                                                       .  .  .  .   .  . . .
------------------------------+ All The Best in '93,. .  .  . .  *  . . .   .
Reply To:                     | Merry Christmas!      . . .  .  /oc . . .  . .
     I18BC@CunyVM.Cuny.Edu    | Edward Galarza,          .  .  / o c  .   .
     I18BC@CunyVM.BitNet      | Brooklyn College Of The     . /o  o c   .   .
     IRC: Spartacus           | City University Of New York  /o  o o c   .  .
------------------------------+ "Que viva el OS/2!"   __________| |__________
                                                      #######################
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: jwidman@whsun1.whoi.edu (James Widman)
Subject: Re: Q on late Dec PDK CD.
Organization: NOAA-NMFS
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 92 13:24:10 GMT

In article <92364.175008LENBC@CUNYVM.BITNET> Lenny Caputo NY <LENBC@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:
>Hi folks
>
>   I have a question about the Dec PDK CD.  I recall someone on
>one of the OS/2 newsgroups said they received the Dec PDK as a gift.
>Does this mean IBM is shipping free Dec PDK CD to all current members
>of the DAP program this month?  Or do we have to order it for $15
>
You have to order it, no automatic shipping and billing :-). 

Newsgroups: misc.forsale-computers.comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer,misc.forsale.computers.pc-clone
From: shaikh@ee470.ee.mcgill.ca (SHAIKH/AMIR/MR)
Subject: 386SX-25 baby-mini-AT size motherboard with Cyrix 387SX-25 co. pro.
Organization: EE Lab, McGill University EE Lab, Montreal
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 03:53:53 GMT
From: francis@vnet.ibm.com (Tim Francis)
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 93 12:05:19 EST
Subject: Re: C Set/2 Compiler
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Reply-To: francis@vnet.ibm.com
Organization: IBM Canada Lab, WorkFrame/2 development
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM

In article <1993Jan3.040817.6823@midway.uchicago.edu>,
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:
>
>In article <1i57t6INNjc3@neuro.usc.edu> merlin@neuro.usc.edu (merlin) writes:
>>> How much is the latest C set/2 Compiler running?
>>Well, if you order the November 1992 OS/2 2.1 Preliminary Development Kit
>>(PDK) CDROM you get C set/2 and a bunch of other usefull stuff for $15.00.
>
>Best approach.

One word of warning: the PDK is beta code.  It's pretty stable, but if
you need a fully supported compiler for production use, you should
buy the real thing.

>                                               The new promotional
>price is $375, and it runs into April, I believe.

Correct -- April 6, to be precise.   -tim
Organization: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Thursday, 24 Dec 1992 12:08:01 EST
From: <ADMN8684@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Using IDC in a Device Driver

Greetings,


Has anyone worked with the IDC capabilities in OS/2? In particular I want
to control the mouse drviver from a serial driver I have written.


Thanks In Advance,


West Suhanic, Rogers Communication Center, (416) 979-5000 ext 7420.

              E-Mail: ADMN8684@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: jawetzel@athena.mit.edu (The Rottweiler)
Subject: Re: 32-bit programming using MASM 6.00b
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:39:14 GMT

I'd like to thank everyone for the input - it works.  And now for some 
observations.  Use ml with the /c flag unless who have renamed link386 to link
and its first in your path.  Link produces "Relative frame fix-up" errors.
I assume that link is a 16-bit linker and therefore complains about the flat
model.  Use the 32-bit calls (Dos32Write and Dos32Exit).  When using 32-bit
calls, push the arguments on the stack in the opposite order as with 16-bit
OS/2.  Make sure that there is a DGROUP or link386 complains.

One pain is that I have to go thru basedef.h and bsedos.h to find the correct
parameters for the system calls.  I guess I'll have to eventually go thru these
headers and convert them all to PROTO statements.  Next I'll start using the 
PROTO/INVOKE combination to clean things up.

Just in case anyone is interested, the final version of the hello program with
full segment definitions is included below.  Thanks again for all your help.

						Jake

-------------------- hello.asm -------------------------

		title	hello.asm

		.386
		.387

INCLUDE 	filecomp.inc

cr		equ	0dh
lf		equ	0ah

stdin		equ	0
stdout		equ	1
stderr		equ	2

DGROUP		group	 _DATA,CONST

_DATA		segment dword public flat 'DATA'

wlen		dword	?

_DATA		ends

CONST		segment dword public flat 'CONST'

testmess	byte	cr,lf,'Hello World.',cr,lf
testmess_len	equ	$-testmess

CONST		ends

_TEXT		segment dword public flat 'CODE'

		assume	ds:FLAT,ss:FLAT,es:FLAT

main		proc	near

		push	offset wlen
		push	testmess_len
		push	offset testmess
		push	stdout
		call	Dos32Write

		or	eax,eax
		jnz	error

		push	eax
		pushd	1
		call	Dos32Exit

error:		push	eax
		pushd	1
		call	Dos32Exit

main		endp

_TEXT		ends

		end	main


-------------------- hello.inc -------------------------

externdef	Dos32Write:near
externdef	Dos32Exit:near


-------------------- hello.def -------------------------

NAME Hello WINDOWCOMPAT
DESCRIPTION "OS/2 2.0 Test Program"
PROTMODE
STACKSIZE 4096

-------------------- assemble commands  ----------------

ml /c /Zi /W3 hello.asm
link386 /NOE /NOD /ALIGN:16 /M /DE 
hello,,,d:\os2\doscalls,hello;
From: smackinl01@cc.curtin.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: HPFS - Microsoft address anyone?
Date: 27 Dec 92 14:36:18 GMT
Organization: Curtin University of Technology

I asked some time ago on this newsgroup requesting specifics of the HPFS filing
system. Since then I've had some basics posted to me by Bruce O'Neel (sp?) (ta
muchly) and I've also sent a request to the AsiaPacific DAP co-ordinator.

From what I got from the DAP person, the specifics are in a microsoft
publication which IBM cannot give to me due to the politicking going on at the
moment.

So what I really need to know are ways and means to contact microsoft. Are they
on the net? Is there someone in particular that I should talk to? Remember, I
live in Australia so 'phoning is not (usually) an option. If someone could help
here it would be much appreciated.

The reason I need the internals is (a) to write a HPFS filing system for MS-DOS
and (b) to write one for Linux. If anyone has done either of these before
(filing systems that is) then their input would also be much appreciated.

Thank _you_ for your time,

Simon
-- 
Masochism: "Hit me, hit me."
Sadism: "No."
From: francis@vnet.ibm.com (Tim Francis)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 92 09:29:24 EST
Subject: Re: Workframe/2 Problems
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Reply-To: francis@vnet.ibm.com
Organization: IBM Canada Lab, WorkFrame/2 development
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM

In article <1992Dec23.143127.26177@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>,
cambria@smaug.enet.dec.com (Michael C. Cambria) writes:
>
>What about the Toolkit?  I have Workbench, not C/Set (I *had* the
>Watcom C/386 compiler already, sorry.)  Is there, say, a
>toolkit@vnet.ibm.com or some such thing?
>
>Thanks,
>/Mike

Unfortunately, I don't think there is such an id.  I'm trying to check
(the toolkit is supported by Boca, not Toronto), but for the time being
you should use the 1-800-3-IBM-OS2 number to report toolkit bugs.  -tim
From: bigbill@vnet.ibm.com (Bill Sarantakos)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 00:07:08 EST
Subject: Viewing source under debugger
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Organization: IBM Corporation
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM

In article <BzKuJI.JI@rufous.cs.unm.edu>,
seiferth@rufous.cs.unm.edu (Justin Seiferth) writes:
>
>Is there a trick to using the debugger in source code, vs. dissassembly
>mode?  I have not been able to open any files in other than dissassembly
>mode.  I've tried all the project compile, debug and source code options
>which seem reasonable.  Please let me know...

Did you try the /DE (or /CO) option when linking?

Bill
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: altman@cs.sunysb.edu (Jeff Altman)
Subject: Re: Q on late Dec PDK CD.
Organization: Dept of Computer Science, State U of NY at Stony Brook
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 17:36:38 GMT

James Widman (jwidman@whsun1.whoi.edu) wrote:
: In article <92364.175008LENBC@CUNYVM.BITNET> Lenny Caputo NY <LENBC@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:
: >Hi folks
: >
: >   I have a question about the Dec PDK CD.  I recall someone on
: >one of the OS/2 newsgroups said they received the Dec PDK as a gift.
: >Does this mean IBM is shipping free Dec PDK CD to all current members
: >of the DAP program this month?  Or do we have to order it for $15
: >
: You have to order it, no automatic shipping and billing :-). 
: 
What Dec PDK CD?

I just ordered the PDK CD last Thursday and received the Nov PDK CD.
The order desk claimed there was no Dec PDK, just the OS/2 2.1 Beta CD
which was to start shipping on 12/28.

Do you have a PDK labeled 12/92?

--
- Jeff  | Altmania Productions     |================================|
 ~   ~	| P.O. Box 849             | jaltman    @ ccmail.sunysb.edu |
 * | *	| East Setauket, New York  | altman     @ sbcs.sunysb.edu   |
\_____/	| 11733                    | 71530.3252 @ CompuServe.COM    |
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: C Set/2 Compiler
Date: 3 Jan 93 04:08:17 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1i57t6INNjc3@neuro.usc.edu> merlin@neuro.usc.edu (merlin) writes:
>> How much is the latest C set/2 Compiler running? 
>Well, if you order the November 1992 OS/2 2.1 Preliminary Development Kit
>(PDK) CDROM you get C set/2 and a bunch of other usefull stuff for $15.00.

Best approach.

>On the other hand, my copy of Orfali & Harkey's Client Server Programming
>with OS/2 2.0 2nd Edition book says WorkSet/2 (which includes WorkFrame/2,
>Developer's Toolkit, and C Set/2 compiler kit) lists at $895 -- but could
>be had from OS/2 Developer Assistance Program for $295 from 5/92-9/92 as a
>special discount off their regular price.  So, while list price isn't low
>cost -- you may get a special promotional deal -- or ask about educational
>pricing which is often very attractive.

That promotion has been revised and extended.  The new promotional
price is $375, and it runs into April, I believe.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: nu2204@kirk.coma.sbg.ac.at 
Subject: CASE-Tools
Reply-To: nu2204@kirk.coma.sbg.ac.at
Organization: University of Salzburg / Austria
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 19:57:59 GMT


Hi,

does anyone know something about CASE-Tools which allow creation of dialog-windows and
DBM-accesses too?
Both features in one and the same tool could be quite interesting, doesnt it?

Many thanks,

Norbert, RIST++
From: selliott@cup.portal.com (J Steve Elliott)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Looking for OS/2 1.3 Named Pipes info
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 14:04:26 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

>Does anyone have any info related to programming
>OS/2 1.3 Named Pipes?

>Or references to material that does that is still 
>available?

About all you need to know can be found in the OS/2 1.3 toolkit documentation,
in the Programming Guide, or in the online documentation. Additionally, try
"Client Server Programming with OS/2 EE" by Orfali & Harkley, Published by
Van Nostrand Reinhold. Also, If you have specific questions, email them to
me, as I have been through this before.

>What about portability issues re: 1.3 -> 2.0?

You cannot directly port Named Pipe API calls from 1.3 to 2.0, as they have
changed the API calls. It's not too great a task to rewrite the code for
2.0 tho. Again, there is a second edition of "Client Server..." which addresses
OS/2 2.0.

Steve Elliott
From: serls@dashs.denver.co.us (Dave Serls)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Any Way to Determine What Process Has a File LOCKED 
Distribution: world
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 21:24:41 GMT
Organization: Sorry Software

pgleason@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM writes in article <79306@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM>:
>
> Is there any way to determine what process has a file locked ???? We
> have an unusual occurrance of a file becoming locked, but we cannot find
> any program (using PSTAT) running that locks the file. The OS/2 error message
> (SYS0032) says another process has it locked, but doesn't give a Process ID
> or anything.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
  I've had this reported when my application (blush) already had
  the file open.
--
============================================================================
Dave Serls                                                 303-973-6120
serls@dashs.denver.co.us                                   Sorry Software
============================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: redmax@sabrina.dei.unipd.it (Massimo_Alessan Santin 197369/IL)
Subject: Re: CASE-Tools
Organization: D.E.I. Universita' di Padova, Italia
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 01:29:43 GMT

In article <BzoFGn.Ctp@cosy.sbg.ac.at> nu2204@kirk.coma.sbg.ac.at writes:
>
>Hi,
>
>does anyone know something about CASE-Tools which allow creation of dialog-windows and
>DBM-accesses too?
>Both features in one and the same tool could be quite interesting, doesnt it?
>
>Many thanks,
>
>Norbert, RIST++
>

Now I'm trying Gpf. Gpf is a CASE tool that use a visual approach. You can 
create windows and dialogs. Then you can test these windows or you can generate 
a source file. Gpf can also use DBM and can generate embedded SQL. 
The price is $995 in USA.

Massimo A. Santin
From: merlin@neuro.usc.edu (merlin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Q on late Dec PDK CD.
Date: 31 Dec 1992 09:20:01 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: neuro.usc.edu

>>I just received this afternoon an "OS/2 2.1 Beta Version 12/92" CRDOM
>>stamped with the ID "CDRM1001720 92-51" - looks like the current disk.
>Alex,
>    Whats on the new CD other than the 2.1 beta?
>    Is there a new beta release of the C++ Compiler?
>    I haven't purchased the Nov '92 and I wanted to know
>    whether I should order both Nov & Dec or just the Dec.
>    Thanks, and have a great New Year's Eve and to everyone
>    in this newsgroup, may 1993 bring lots of success to
>    everyone.

As it turns out, the 12/92 CDROM shipped by the fullfillment center
(Order Number CD122292 -- the 12/22/92 CDROM) is NOT a PDK -- this
CDROM contains:  (1) OS/2 2.1 beta, (2) MMPM/2, (3) the Developer's
Toolkit [this confused the fullfillment center staffer into calling
the Dec 92 CDROM a PDK], and (4) a debug version of the OS2 kernel.

The most recent PDK is CD111692 (the 11/16/92 CDROM) which includes
the CSet2 compiler, documentation, TCP/IP support, etc.  However, it
may be missing support for LanServer (which was included on Oct '92
CDROM) and possibly a few other previously released beta materials.
Tech Support advised me to get both Oct and Nov CDROMs for my work
[distributed scientific image acquisition/processing system] -- but
so far the fullfillment center can only find the Nov 92 PDK in their
database.  IBM National Support OS Help Center is trying to find the
Oct 92 PDK order number for me right now.

Sorry about the mistake.  The 12/92 CDROM is definitely NOT the PDK!

Thanks, AJ

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander-James Annala
Principal Investigator
Neuroscience Image Analysis Network
HEDCO Neuroscience Building, Fifth Floor
University of Southern California
University Park
Los Angeles, CA 90089-2520
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: gordt@cyberspc.muug.mb.ca (Gord Tulloch)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: PM/WPS Programming References
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 92 23:30:33 GMT
Summary: Any recommendations on good books re: above? 
Followup-To: gordt@cyberspc.muug.mb.ca
Organization: Cyberspace Online Information System
Keywords: OS/2 PROGRAMMING PM WPS SOM

All:
 
First of all, Merry Xmas and a Happy and Prosperous New Year to all!

I'm playing around with EMX and want to write some PM programs.  EMX 
seems to be able to do the job (got the pm1 programming working nicely)
but I have no tutorials or references for PM programming beyond the MS
OS/2 Programming Reference Vol. 1 borrowed from the local library.  Does
anyone have suggestions as to a more timely (i.e. 2.0 aware) tutorials
and programmer's reference books?  

Regards,
  Gord

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
==  Gord Tulloch           |     Voice: (204) 775-3650 (work)     ==
==  173 Antrim Road        |            (204) 663-7941 (home      ==
==  Winnipeg, Manitoba     |     Data : gordt@grpwest.muug.mb.ca  ==
==  R2K 3H9                |            gordt@cyberspc.muug.mb.ca ==
==                         |     FIDO : 1:348/207@fidonet.org     ==
--------------------------------------------------------------------
==                    Official IBM OS/2 Ambassador!               ==
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer