From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
Subject: Re: Happy Anniversary!  (Four days and counting)
Summary: Dennis inpersonates DOD
Keywords: From: decay@
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 20:23:41 GMT

In article <6dank4c.gordons@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
#<1992Aug25.001851.11608@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) :
##<1992Aug17.174204.6949@coopsol.com> gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
###<1992Aug15.232244.14853@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Chaney) :
####<yd6mlza.gordons@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) :
#####<1992Aug12.215027.1814@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Chaney):
######<1992Aug11.181819.9370@coopsol.com> gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga) :
#######<1992Aug10.171155.7841@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Chaney) :
###...
#######Kinda like a barnacle.  Seriously, has someone *really* tried to get your
#######net access removed?  Do you have proof of this accusation?  Isn't true
#######that you think it was wonderful that Dan Bredy lost his net access?  And
#######now you are whining that you think someone tried to remove yours.
######
######Susan Garvin? 
#####
#####I see a name.  I don't see any *proof*.
####
####She tried to complain about my having posted and twisted her name and
####substituting it with mine, as a joke. Even as though my system admins
####tossed it out and went on with business as usual. 
###
###You buffoon.  Why do you continue to pretend?  Susan didn't contact your
###sysadmins.  She contacted *her* sysadmins.  They apparently contacted yours
###and asked that you *stop doctoring posts*, not that you have your access
###removed.
##
##I didn't say she contacted my sysadmins. Did you see that anywhere? I said,
##and you can read the line above, "She tried to complain about..."

Chaney must have forgotten that he did say that I had sent
mail to his sysadmins.  I can understand that he lacks the
mental capacity to juggle all of his lies.  

/begin quote/

In Article <1992Aug16.000041.16074@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:


#And that insinuation holds after considering the e-mail my system
#admins got from Drieux and Dan King and Susan Garvin (over forging a
#post, which by putting my .sig on the bottom and announcing that it
#was a joke IN THE SAME ARTICLE, proved I was not truly forging
#anything at all - it was a joke, and my sysadmins treated it as such
#and junked it). 

/end quote/
  
##And the net.access removal requests (among other punitive actions
##requested), came from Drieux and Scott Roby, among others, who were led
##into believing I was posting as Dennis Hall, and who wrote asking that "I
##be stopped."

He's learned a lot from DOD, hasn't he?  

#Read the top of this post.  I asked you if someone *really* tried to have
#your access removed.  You replied with Susan Garvin's name.  Complaining
#about someone falsifying posts isn't the same as trying to get someone
#kicked off the news system.  Then you even contradict yourself when you
#say that the access removal requests didn't even come from Susan.  Why did
#you bother giving me her name as an answer when she didn't even try to
#have your posting priveleges revoked?

Now, Gordon, surely you've dealt with pathological liars
before.  You have to know that they typically respond with
more extreme lies when confronted with the truth (see any
response for Holtsinger for an example.)  

I will again point out that the action desired by my sysadmins
did occur - Challaney has ceased forging posts.  

Susan