HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu (John G. Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Joel Furr proves that he is an ass. QED
Date: 8 Oct 92 14:51:59 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin

In article <1992Oct7.171952.12215@hubcap.clemson.edu>,
jlysagh@hubcap.clemson.edu (james joseph lysaght) writes:
> 
> The following are taken from post involving an adult professional
> discussion on differences of opinion.

[terms to which Mr. Lysaght objects but, nevertheless, sees fit to repeat,
and scads of fascinating whitespace, deleted.]

> I don't really care much either way about whether or not there ore off
> topic posts in a newslist.  I only read the ones that interest me.  I 
> probably would not stop reading the list just because a bunch of people
> want to talk about some cthulu thing I have never heard of but I
> probably WILL stopp reading the list because from the language and
> intellect displayed here it is apparent that the high schools are back in
> full swing and all the little kiddies who never grew up and learned to
> hold an adult discourse with differences of opinions are flooding the
> lists with innapropriate noise that really is not considered socially
> acceptable in today's world.  To all you who post such things as that I
> listed above... stop wasting your time and everyone elses and go do
> your homework!  You obviously are just immature school children and we are not
> here to read your pre-pubescent stress releasing drivel.

You remind me of Ross Perot wanting out of the Navy because he found the
cussing and drinking offensive.  If you are going to unsubscribe every
group that has a little ribald flaming going on, you might as well give up
on Usenet altogether.

I assume that you read alt.flame or you wouldn't have posted to it.  Or are
you simply one of the clueless freshman newbie twits who doesn't pay
attention to followup lines?  Let's assume the latter for the moment.  If
you are an ignorant dupe who can't utilize a killfile and who, indeed,
hasn't yet figured out what all the keys on his terminal are for, it is
still hard to imagine your missing

> The following is a flame with profanity. Move along if you might be offended.

I guess I'll have to assume that your post was questionably-crafted
flamebait.  Allow me to welcome you to the froup.  Now go play with ken.   

**********
John G. Robinson
robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu
From: bufalini@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Bruce A Bufalini)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Lee, Lifeson, and Peart are #1 (was Re: The New Rush on the Block)
Date: 8 Oct 92 19:24:06 GMT
Reply-To: bufalini@gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Distribution: na
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1992Oct8.090445.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> aephel01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>In article <ki+vH-_w#9@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>> In article <6434@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca> king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King) writes:
>>>In article <1j0wHcv*&9@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@across.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>>>>No, I am truly as big a genius as all other Rush fans.  
>>>
>>>No argument here. You ARE as big a genius as other Rush fans. Braindead.
>> 
>> Right, there is no argument, for your point is null.  If Rush fans were brain
>> dead, why are there so many people posting to alt.music.rush?  
>
>Okay Mr. Information, if the New Kids On The Block are so terrible,
>and they are, why do they make so much money?  It's good to see that

Because most of the adolescent population in this country is brainwashed into
believing that the New Kids' music is quality music.  Their lyrics make no
sense whatsoever.  It's just random noise, unlike anything Rush has ever
released.

--
Bruce A Bufalini (bufalini@among.gis.psu.edu) | Plus ca change,
P$U Geographic Information Systems            | Plus c'est la meme chose.
                                              |
                                              | Neil Peart, 1978
From: shamel@mais.hydro.qc.ca (Stephane Hamel)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: EMERGENCY: Lightning Club isn't a Police
Date: 7 Oct 92 11:52:09 GMT
Organization: Hydro-Quebec (DSB)

dpipes@spica.srg (Dave Pipes x4552) writes:

>In article <sauron.718319219@femto.engr.mun.ca> sauron@femto.engr.mun.ca (Patrick Ryan) writes:
>>ptran@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca (Phat H Tran) writes:
>>
>>>Any of you think it would do any good if we net guardians report such
>>>blatant acts of piracy to the sysadmins of the machines that these guys
>>>are on?

This is pointless! The sysadmin of that site probably know very well about
this... And regarding those "net guardians"... they simply does not exist. The
net, has configured and has it was directed by it's "creators" (ho God!) is
depending on the good behavior of each and every individual site (the same
goes for every service of the net: FTP, IRC, News etc...) If one site choose
to get out of the track, it's there own business. However, usually, people
will respect decent networking habits, either because they feel they are
right or because all the pressure comming from other net users. However,
if you do bypass Laws (with a Big "L"), then the FBI (in US), CMP (in Canada)
or any other investigation/police force can do something about it. But has
the laws currently are in most places, it takes time and money to do it...

>>
>>No, but some of us think you net.fuckups should mind your own
>>net.business.  Wake up and smell the coffee - while what they're doing
>>may be immoral, it's not illegal.  Now fuckoff and leave them alone!
>>

This is a nice example of bad networking habit... this guy should have
responded in private if he can't use a more mature language...

>Looks like school is back in session, and the children are playing again...

Well... maybe you are right after all! :)
--
 Stephane Hamel (SHamel@Mais.Hydro.Qc.Ca) | AutoControl Inc.
 Senior Programmer-Analyst                | Montreal, Quebec, Canada
From: krobinso@redorange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: oggles
Date: 11 Oct 92 20:26:22 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1992Oct10.180252.7076@cs.odu.edu> page@nightshade.cs.odu.edu () writes:
>
>
>:another one of dan's sporadic postings...
>
>hey up everyone!
>
>this isn't exactly related to anything, but
>yesterday i was walking down Hampton Blvd,
>and coming right at me were on of those, ahem,
>'mentally challenged' people and i swear as
>i passed him he was saying,  
> 
>
>"OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE
> OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE
> OGGLE..." (repeated ad nauseum)
>
>did i actually meet  k e n  or is this just
>a pattern of all the  m e n t a l l y 
>i n c o m p e t e n t?

K e n does not OGGLE out of his largest facial orifice, thus it was
not K e n.

>'God wants small towns, God wants pain, God wants clean
>up rock campaigns...'  --Roger Waters.  
>page@offa.cs.odu.edu

"Entertainment" gave Roger an A-. He deserves an A+ for this effort.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Subject: Re: Rob Lost His Girl
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 22:04:27 GMT

In article <1992Oct15.195747.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu>,
aephel01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>In article <1992Oct15.224538.10095@morrow.stanford.edu>, EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara) writes:
>> In article <exuptr.748.719090204@exu.ericsson.se>,
>> exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor) writes:
>>>In article <1992Oct14.144022.24653@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>>>
>>>>as for jennifer, we are getting married,
>>>something that makes my dog very
>>>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>happy.
>>>^^^^^^
>>>
>>>Careful, that's a pretty easy set-up ;-)
>> what, was it too easy for you?  here, let me help you:  i'll bet it
>> makes jennifer happy, too, cause now she can get it from a real man,
>> and won't have to use that sonar locational device any longer.
>> damned decent of you to make her an honest woman, and your dog a
>> happy puppy!
>>
>> there.  that's better.  i feel SOOOOOO much better now.
>>
>
>Thanks Lara, jennifer stops posting and rob's keyboard comes unglued
>from his desk, and now another woman starts talking dirty again.
>You will be his fantasy.  He'll be jammin' that crooked, stinky,
>shrivled dick in jen on his wedding night and be moaning 'Oh yes,
>Lara!'  And after jen leaves him, he'll have to go back to poking
>his mutt.
   it's okay, i can live with that, after all, us sisters gotta
stick together (good one-liner opening there, for all those of you
who can't think of insults aimed above one's navel :>  plus his dog
asked me to say it, he's been missing rob getting dates for him

>
>-- no sig necessary --
>       Aza

especially after you refused to pay that one time ...
moi
From: krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This K E N person...
Date: 13 Oct 92 19:50:19 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1992Oct13.013220.18963@gucis.cit.gu.edu.au> cweller@gucis.cit.gu.edu.au (Catherine Weller) writes:
>krobinso@redorange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>
>>In article <1b7055INNjfc@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Mistress Elizabeth) writes:
>>>
>>>I have two questions about K E N:
>>>
>>>1) Does he have a real life?  If so, how does he find the time to post here
>>>   so frequently?
>
>>K e n's life is not a subject for discussion on this newsgroup. The post
>>before you is real, thus K e n is real, and finally, K e n's life is
>>real.
>
>Translation: I do not have a life. I am actually an Artificial Intelligence
>	    program gone wrong.
>
>Proof: He(?) does not refer to himself in first person. Always as K e n, 
>	therefore, he's either wierd, psychotic, or an AI program that
>	failed to get the grade.

Wrong. K e n = K e n. K e n != Artificial Intelligence program.

K e n refers to K e n as K e n because K e n is K e n. It is quite a
simple process.

>>Scheduling daily routines efficiently and for the most effective results
>>permits K e n the proper amount of time to post in alt.flame. Frequency
>>is irrelevant.
>
>Translation: I am a background process the sysops hasn't killed yet.
>
>Proof: Approximately five seconds after I post this, he will flame me.
>	Five minutes, tops.

K e n is not a background process. Your proof has been disproved...

Note the following header extracted from your original post.

From psuvax1!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!griffin!kurango!gucis!cweller Tue Oct 13 15:37:44 EDT 1992
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  
Article: 46298 of alt.flame
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: cweller@gucis.cit.gu.edu.au (Catherine Weller)
Subject: Re: This K E N person...
Organization: Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 01:32:20 GMT
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


K e n will have completed K e n's post sometime before 4:00 PM EDT.
It is quite apparent that K e n did not followup five minutes after your
post, thus K e n is not a background process or a program of any sort.
K e n is K e n.

>>>2) What is this fascination with the space bar?
>
>>There is no fascination. It is simply how K e n's name is spelled,
>>which is K e n.
>
>This might be true. K e n, as near as I can figure, is an abbreviation for:
>Kludged, but Entertaining Newbie.
>
>This was the name his programmer gave him, before assigning it to a 
>background process. (just watch, K e n will post a "you are mistaken" flame)

K e n is not an abbreviation, nor has K e n been programmed, in the sense
of a human programmer.

>Hope you are entertained by the trut

K e n found it amusing, but filled with a great deal of misinformation.
Your statements could never have been considered facts, and now have
been disproved on a theoretical level. Thinking is good for you,
however, focus on true information instead of misinformation.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Subject: Re: So let's all do the DarcyShuffle!
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 22:41:54 GMT

In article <Bw4pH7.H5v@cs.dal.ca>,
franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin) writes:
>In article <1992Oct14.175558.18475@morrow.stanford.edu> EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara) writes:
>>In article <1992Oct13.010843.14916@ncsu.edu>,
>>dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
>>>In article <pmxz8zp@rpi.edu>
>>>keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
>>>
>>>> the issue was force. force. force.
>>>
>>>Abortion is force.
>>>
>>uh, excuse me, who's being forced?  abortion is not force, it's
>>choice; making abortion illegal is force.
>>
>Well Lara, some of us don't think the unborn child is given much say
>in the matter. Why don't you wait 9 months or so and THEN ask them if
>they'd like to live. Come to think of it, give them at least 19 years,
>and then let THEM decide if their life is worth living. If you don't
>give them their right to life, then you're doing the forcing dear.
>   In any case, what's this doing in alt.flame? Sheesh, this isn't
>a flame. Where are the good ol' guys?
pretty darned clever to have snuck in that pro-life diarrhear
and THEN say what is this doing i alt.flame.  my brain is reeling,
just a second, the room is spinning ... okay i'm better now.  golly
gee, stevie, you play SOOOOO rough, can i have some MORE ?  that was
so good, i'll even BEG!

jeez, what are you doing, trying to prove that you're lamer than i?
okay, you WON.

where are the good old guys?  apparently sitting around wearing
those little white jackets with the really lllooooooong sleeves,
'cause they started at your .sig one too many times  -- don't you
wish ... i thought you said you changed your major ... to what, are
YOU the one that's been giving rod the directions on the best use of
a severed dog dick?  tell me, is it ALMOST as tasty as sushi, or do
you cook it first, in rob's, uh, wine ???

say, did you cure that nasty ooozing infection, or have you died of
it yet?

>
>steve
>--

peace & love, DOPE
moi

>aasdSteveFranklin-Subliminal Psychology Major.ks;dlasBlueJaysRULEkasdfeahsdbfl
>sd;lfaswoq[eBuyMeAQuadra!!!mbnZMXCNdfsba;KdSPAMiuroqiyetIBMSuxiweuryth'ewr;mxn
>qpuepriuPartyOneqtuj;,n.,xnc,kjasFlameMeNot!;lkj;lkgkjd;askElvisLivesjhfquweru
>zx.cfranklin@ug.cs.dal.ca,sk;t;lrut[Superboy@ac.dal.cav.zx,Physics!eq3rwkh;oHA
From: page@nightshade.cs.odu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: oggles
Date: 10 Oct 92 18:02:52 GMT
Organization: Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va



:another one of dan's sporadic postings...

hey up everyone!

this isn't exactly related to anything, but
yesterday i was walking down Hampton Blvd,
and coming right at me were on of those, ahem,
'mentally challenged' people and i swear as
i passed him he was saying,  
 

"OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE
 OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE
 OGGLE..." (repeated ad nauseum)

did i actually meet  k e n  or is this just
a pattern of all the  m e n t a l l y 
i n c o m p e t e n t?


disclaimer:  i don't care if you flame me
or my sig or my dead grandmother.  have fun.
-- 
'God wants small towns, God wants pain, God wants clean
up rock campaigns...'  --Roger Waters.  
page@offa.cs.odu.edu
From: alizard@wizclan.Kludge.COM (A.Lizard)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A Technical Request
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 92 20:37:28 PDT
Organization: Wizard's Clan, Moraga CA

bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com (J H Woodyatt) writes:

> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
> # drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
> # 
> # >
> # > I have been politiely asked in email to 'dumb down'
> # > my posts for the folks in alt.fan.dan-qualye
> # > and alt.fan.rush-limbaugh....


Why? The only reason for dumbing down a post on the alt.fan.dan-quayle
newsgroup is if Danny-boy himself is reading the newsgroup, and if
he IS, I'm sure the many friendly people around here would be happy
to explain any words of more than two syllables used in a post.
A.Lizard
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: alt.lame
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 20:54:59 GMT


oh, just fuck off, ok. 

damn.

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Cussing
Summary: What the hell!
Organization: Rice University
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 20:30:56 GMT

In article <1b4b89INNcqd@bigboote.WPI.EDU> jaholmes@ee.WPI.EDU (Jennifer Holmes) writes:
>I want to know why, if Liz cusses it's okay, but if I do I'm not a lady
>and Rob's dog, I thought he didn't have one, won't even like me? 
>You people are, can I say fucked here or will I be unlady like to do so.

You can say it...and we can laugh at you for it, or tell you where to stick
it, or agree with you entuhusiastically, or do any of 1,955 other things.
(Of course, since you're being so charitable with your assessment of us, I
think I'll take the logical course and just tell you to kindly eat shit and
die.  (I hope Ken appreciates that. :-)  )

--PLH, tell these kids today how hard we had it when *we* were their age,
they don't believe a thing...

-- 
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: Bruce A Bufalini <bufalini@gis.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: Bruce requires surgical removal.
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 18:15:04 GMT

In article <6452@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca> king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King) writes:
>In article <Bvv9Gy.JtA@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <BvuvJn.7nF@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>>>In article <BvtC5v.LtF@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@redviolet.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>
>>>> <who cares?>

Misinformed individuals such as yourself should care.

>>>--PLH.  Where *do* they get these brainless wonders from at Penn State?
>
>(1) Note that tealblue and redviolet have been added to Kenneth's box of
>crayolas. Despite what Kenneth has said, it seems fitting that he should
>post from a box of crayons.

Crayola is merely a designation for a network of computers.  Crayons are quite
irrelevant to K e n, for they serve no purpose whatsoever.

>(2) PLH must have reversed the wording above. Should it not read 'State Penn' ?

No, Penn State is quite appropriate.

--
Bruce A Bufalini (bufalini@among.gis.psu.edu) | Plus ca change,
P$U Geographic Information Systems            | Plus c'est la meme chose.
                                              |
                                              | Neil Peart, 1978
From: king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Question about this group...c
Date: 13 Oct 92 13:13:22 GMT
Organization: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine

In article <1992Oct8.103704.11854@ra.msstate.edu> chambles@whale.st.usm.edu (John William Chambless) writes:
>WHy do you people even bother typing anything? Your posts consist of
>37 lines of quotes, 1 lin of text, and a 9 line signature. A simple program
>could automate the process, so you won't have to even logon to the system.

We have several of those programs around. There are at least two at PSU,
and one more that never seems to leave Rutgers. The latter is slightly more
complex than the very simple ones that run on PSU's computers. Look at the
posts from crayola.psu and find out what too many years of listening to Rush
'music' will do to your brain.

-- 
                       Se non e` vero, e` ben trovato 
     ...{utzoo|mnetor}!dciem!dretor!king        king@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Bis)
Subject: Re: Bruce Bufalini, braindead
Keywords: King has no brain
Organization: Bis Information Services
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 11:46:00 GMT

In article <ki+vH-_w#9@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>In article <6434@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca> king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King) writes:
>>No argument here. You ARE as big a genius as other Rush fans. Braindead.
>
>Right, there is no argument, for your point is null.  If Rush fans were brain
>dead, why are there so many people posting to alt.music.rush?  Braindead
>individuals are incapable of accessing USENET.  

You mean your mommy helps you?
From: mattb@ctron.com (Matt Brown)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This K E N person...
Date: 12 Oct 92 19:07:54 GMT
Reply-To: mattb@olympus.ctron.com (Matt Brown)
Followup-To: alt.braindead
Organization: Cabletron Systems INc.

(Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>(Mistress Elizabeth) writes:

>>I have two questions about K E N:

>>1) Does he have a real life?  If so, how does he find the time to post here
>>   so frequently?

>K e n's life is not a subject for discussion on this newsgroup. 

Then why, pray tell, are you discussing it? Would it not be more "efficient"
to ignore "irrelevant" questions?

>The post before you is real, thus K e n is real, and finally, K e n's life is
>real.

Ah, i love the smell of irrefutable logic in the morning...whoops! That's
Ken's head on fire! Somebody piss on it and put it out.

>Scheduling daily routines efficiently and for the most effective results
>permits K e n the proper amount of time to post in alt.flame. Frequency
>is irrelevant.

>K e n   R o b i n s o n

If I had to guess, I would say he is studying to be Dan Quayle's speechwriter.

Matt
"Braindead individuals are incapable of accessing USENET." - Bruce Bufalino
                                                             psu.edu, naturally
From: kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu (Theodore A. Kaldis)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Yes on 9
Date: 15 Oct 92 02:50:21 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <1992Oct7.134227.20827@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:

> so tell us about your father, theo.

My father died in 1984.  What more do you want to know?

> how does it make you feel, the things he used to do to you when he was
> toilet training you?

What things?  I had an essentially normal upbringing, and my father
(presumably unlike yours) did not abuse me.  Hence, I grew up normal
and not homosexual.
-- 
The views expressed herein are my   ||  Theodore A. Kaldis
my own only.  Do you seriously      ||  kaldis@remus.rutgers.edu
believe that a major university as  ||  {...}!rutgers!remus.rutgers.edu!kaldis
this would hold such views???       ||
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: (HardCore)
Subject: Jennifer Holmes
Reply-To: smersch@eng.clemson.edu
Organization: College of Engineering, Clemson Univ.
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 03:26:24 GMT

In article 1b4b89INNcqd@bigboote.WPI.EDU, jaholmes@ee.WPI.EDU (Jennifer Holmes) writes:
>I want to know why, if Liz cusses it's okay, but if I do I'm not a lady
>and Rob's dog, I thought he didn't have one, won't even like me? 
>You people are, can I say fucked here or will I be unlady like to do so.

Jennifer,
	
	Give me a break.  There aren't any ladies anymore so what difference does it make what you say.  What do you think that it takes to be a lady anyway?  Do you even know what the word lady means?  I doubt it.

									HardCore.


 



Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion