HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Americas Team
Date: 6 Nov 92 14:30:18 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1992Nov04.132155.4464@bnr.ca>, jeffh@crchh317.BNR.CA (Jeff Hammond)
writes:
>In article <1992Nov03.223402.26647@bnr.ca>, emilio@crchh444.BNR.CA
>(Emilio Rivera) writes:
>|>
>|>Now that I have your attention lets talk.   The name
>|>"Americas Team" is all media hype.  As a long
>|>time Cowboy faithful I hate when that name is used together
>|>with  the Dallas Cowboys.    All the long time fans that I
>|>know agree that the media (local and national) just gave
>|>that name to the Cowboys during the 1970's.   I recall an
>|>article where Tex Schrawm stated that he did not give that
>|>name or suggest to the media to use it.   I also do not recall
>|>Cowboy players, past or present, who enjoyed to have that
>|>name used.
>|>
>|>Now that the Cowboys are on a winning streak the name
>|>has surfaced again.
>|>
>|>Just curious to hear any thoughts on the use of that name
>|>from Cowboy fans/bashers.   I personally would perfer The 'BOYZ.
>|>
>|>
>|>
>|>
>|>======================================================
>|> ** Hey  Nothing   Fancy **  |
>|>                             |
>|>                             |
>|>======================================================
>|>
>|>
>
>       I agree. Anything but that p.i.t.a label which
>has caused more problems and bashing then Hoover and the
>depression.
>---------------------------------------------------------------^--------------
>jeffh@bnr.ca | My opinions do not represent those|            /|\
>mss         | of my employer or any other person|           \ | /
>-------------|-------------------- I know.       |            \|/
>The only true power of the universe| SO THERE!   |<------------+------------>
>is that of the individual. The   |---------------|            /|\
>only true individual is one      |    GO!!!      |           / | \
>who knows his place in the cosmos|   COWBOYS     |         |/_ | _\|
>and seeks to extend it. jjh      |    BILLS      |             |
>---------------------------------------------------------------v--------------
>
It's gotta go!  I only like the Cowboys when Staubach was there.
-- 

------------------------
|   Gail A. Fullman    |
|   Manager - ADMO     |
|   Ext. 83113         |
------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: erk@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (eric.r.kierstead)
Subject: Re: Best/Worst in Franchise History
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 14:15:42 GMT
Keywords: Giants, Cardinals

My teams are the Giants & Cardinals...

GIANTS Worsts:

ALL TIME WORST:Taking Rocky Thompson in the 1st round of the '71 draft.
Near All Time Worst: Letting Tarkenton go back to the Vikes, '72.
Honorable Mention: Signing washed-up Larry Csonka, '75.

Lowest Point in franchise history: THE FUMBLE, 1978

GIANTS Bests:

*Signing unknow Bill Parcells as head coach, 1982.

*Signing "washed-up" Ottis Anderson, 1986.

*Getting "washed-up" Tony Galbraith, 1984.



The CARDINALS only have worsts:

*Firing Gene Stallings because he was too popular, 1989

*Getting rid of "washed-up" Ottis Anderson, 1986.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: Re: Living in Enemy turf
Originator: delarocq@c00167-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 06:58:54 GMT



 On another note, try going to a bowl game in Miami when you are a Bills fan..
 It looks like it might happen.. :)
 Joe Robbie Stadium, decked out in Buffalo Bills wear... :) I LIKE IT!! :)
 

 By the way, Monday Night, November 16th, 1992. Be there. food and all.. :)
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   

   __                     _         __      _  _      /
  /  )      /)  /)       //        /  )    // //     /
 /--<  . . //  //  __.  // __     /--<  o // // _   '
/___/_(_/_//__//__(_/|_</_(_)    /___/_<_</_</_/_) o
         />  />
        </  </

Reporter: "Who do you think is the best running back in the NFL?"
Thurman Thomas: "The running back that went to Oklahoma State".
From: sajja@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (Rajeev  Sajja)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles vs. 49ers:  what'll happen
Date: 12 Nov 92 14:09:12 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1ds2diINN71i@morrow.stanford.edu> GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold) writes:
>In article <1992Nov10.043028.24229@wheaton.wheaton.edu>,
>First off, I don't think that it will be a lopsided game for either
>team. If so, then I would have to think that it would be lopsided in
>favor of the 49ers, and that is not because of the fact that I am a
>fan of the team. The Niners D will not have as tough a day as the
>Eagle defense.  Truly a test for the vaunted Eagle "D".
>Considering that the Saints had their hands full with the Niners
>offense, an offense who was missing John Taylor and not playing at
>the level of intensity as they are now, what makes you think that
>the Eagle "D" will do any better?  I'm most interested in this
>match up. All eyes of the NFL will be on this game.
>

Stuff Deleted....

>The Eagles played an offense who is comparable in ways to the Niners
>offense.  I don't remember the Eagles neutralizing the Cowboys "O"
>line.

You got to remember here that the eagles offense had one YES ONE first
down in the first half and still were in the game just down 0-3. The
offense was going no where. Which means that the defense spent all the
time in the first half on the field, and i am willing to bet that it
will tire out any defense. I am not taking away any credit from Emmitt
Smith, who i think is the league's best RB. And, besides 49ers cant
compare their running game with that of the cowboys.

>You sure aren't giving very much consideration to the fact that the
>49ers offense averages over 30 points a game, 410 yards a game, 152
>yards rushing, 257 yards passing, and possess the top rated
>quarterback in the league. About the only thing that can stop the
>49ers offense IS the 49ers offense.

NOT!. I disagree here. The only team they played this season that had
a good defense was the saints, and they got 16 pts in that one. Apart
from that they played the "Ray Must Go" Giants, Jets, Patriots,
atlanta, buffalo, and we all know what happenned in phoenix.

buffalo's defense is not that great in the league.
The eagles have given away just 107 points in 9 games against some
good offensive power houses.(dallas-twice, skins etc.). It is the
least number of points any team in the NFL has given till now!!
I see this EAGLES-49ERS game being a low scoring one.
If the eagles offense comes to sync by then, i would expect it to be
very close. The eagles are picked to lose this one. I personally would
like the eagles to pull this one off, but i will give the edge to the
9ers. It will be the best game of the year for the eagles in REGULAR
SEASON.

>                                                    Tony
>                                                 GO 49ERS!!!

-Rajeev
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: JGH computer rankings
Keywords: tiguzz
Date: 12 Nov 92 23:34:27 GMT
Organization: .

BRUCE YAEGER writes...
>>                            Last
>>Rank   Team         Rating  Week
>> 1     Cowboys        90     1
>> 2     Eagles         84     2
>> 3     Saints         82     3
>> 4     Vikings        80     4
>> 5     49ers          79     5
>> 6     Redskins       72     6
>> 7     Bills          70     7
> 
>How can Buffalo be seventh!  They are a better team than the Saints,
>Vikings, and Eagles.
>  [seriously deformed Top 10 deleted]
>Bruce, a Bills fan.

Exsqueeze me?  The Saints lost by a total of 8 pts to the Eagles and
Niners.  Triple that and you have the approximate margin of Miami's
buffalo roast at Rich Stadium.  Not to be insulting, but gee Bruce...
....you're gosh awful stupid. (no offense)

PS:  Hope you took the BET II.

GEAUX DOLPHINS!!

-- 
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!!!!    |     Dudd: "Lets play 'Never Hit Yer Granny
(geaux tigers)......    |              with a Great Big Stick.'"
J.J. Clyde  LSU '91     | Charlene: "No, that one makes me cry."
From: jwc@netx.com (Jeffrey W. Comer)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: I'm gonna rip Greg Gumble's head off!!!
Date: 12 Nov 92 17:13:29 GMT
Organization: The Chaos Bobs

mfv23060@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Maurice F. Vallejo) writes:
>	AAAARRRRGGGGGG,  CBS is on my shit list.  CBS shows the first 
>half of the Cowboy/Lions and some of the third quarter.  Then all of a
>sudden they decide to switch over to the Giant/Packers game,  cause
>the Cowboy's had their game wrapped up.  WHAT THE HELL!!  Hello!
>The Giants killed the Packers & CBS doesn't mention the Cowboy/Loins game
>at all.  I waited three years for the Cowboys to get really good, and they
>switch over to a stupid sloppy blowout.   ARRRGGGGG.  What is the address 
>for CBS's sports?  Or better yet, what is Greg's home phone?  
>	If CBS is going to show a game, show it all the way through.  It is 
>very frustrating to get into a game, and then wham-bam a different game.

This subject comes up at least once a year. Unless I am mistaken, the
coverage of NFL games is an affiliate decision; meaning, CBS didn't cut
your game off, the local station did. I do believe there are contractual
obligations involving stations in the markets of the teams affected (in
this case, the CBS affiliates in Dallas and Detroit), so they cannot drop
the game before it is over. On the game in question, those affiliates did
not switch.

Now what may have happened is that CBS offered all of its affiliates the
choice to drop DAL/DET in favor of NYG/GBP, and provided them a studio
insert so that the switch would seem less jarring. CBS can do easily do
this; all it has to do is have the affiliates switch to a different satel-
lite transponder channel.

So don't blame Greg; and besides, he's talent, not management. I doubt he
is making any major decisions.

-JC
The NFL madman.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Floyd Goodrich)
Subject: Re: Emmitt passes Herschel
Organization: Motorola Inc., Austin Tx.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 15:04:06 GMT

(William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith) writes:
>
>   Herschel Walker w/Dallas:
>   Year Games    Att  Yards  Yds/Carry  TD  Rec  Yards  Yds/Rec  TD
>   1986   16     151    737    4.9      12   76    837    11.0    2
>   1987   12     209    891    4.3       7   60    715    11.9    1
>   1988   16     361   1514    4.2       5   53    505     9.5    2
>   1989    5      81    246    3.0       2   22    261    11.9    1
>   ----------------------------------------------------------------
>   Total  49     802   3388    4.2      26  211   2318    11.0    6
>
>   Emmit Smith w/Dallas
>   Year Games    Att  Yards  Yds/Carry  TD  Rec  Yards  Yds/Rec  TD
>   1990   16     241    937    3.9      11   24    228     9.5    0
>   1991   16     365   1563    4.3      12   49    258     5.3    1
>   1992    8     200    896    4.5       9   21    132     6.3    0
>   ----------------------------------------------------------------
>   Total  40     806   3396    4.2      32   94    618     6.6    1
>
>So Herschel = Emmit?  Or was he actually better, since he didn't have the
>same wr troup and qb to move the heat around?  


Look at the trend on avg/gain.  Smith's is increasing from a modest start.
Walker's declined from a very good first year.  Yeah, it's only over 3
years, but it's all the data there is.

The thing that leaps out is Walker's receiving.   Did he get all the 
receptions because he was a good pass receiver or because he was the 
focus of the offense:  both rushing and receiving?  Remember, Dallas 
dumped Dorsett pretty soon after Walker arrived (a year or so later).
Smith seems to be more ionvolved in the receiving this year.  Maybe
Dallas will learn how to run a screen pass if they practice enough.

Floyd Goodrich
floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: THE BET III
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Date: 12 Nov 92 10:17:23 MST
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

In article <1dt68kINNnml@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>, trottibw@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu (Barry Trottier) writes:
> In article <1992Nov10.034157.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu>  writes:
>>
>> Really down to basics here.  It is AFC vs. NFC: Which conference will win
>> the Super Bowl?
>> 
>> The loser of this bet will not be able to post ANYTHING (woof or otherwise)
>> to r.s.f.p until the opening kickoff of the 1993 regular season.  The winners
>> will have unlimited woofing and anti-woofing privileges, as well as the
>> opportunity to post preseason previews of their favorite team, flames of
>> stupid prediction posts, and so on.
>> 
>>                          Name                 Pick
>>                          ---------------------------
>>                          Greg Franklin        NFC
>                           Barry Trottier       NFC

Thank you for taking me up on this, Barry.  I saw our friend "doug the dolfan"
who organized THE BET I and THE BET II has predicted a Miami win over SF.
Let's see if he will dare to place one more bet--THE BET III.  C'mon pink boy!
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Player of the Week Questions
Date: 6 Nov 92 16:58:44 GMT
Article-I.D.: devnull.2801
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <96322@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
>In article <1992Nov05.165753.23471@bnr.ca> patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power) writes:
>>      I noticed that OT Eric Williams got NFC Offensive Player of
>>the Week this week. 
>There is no way he should have gotten this award.  Reggie blew right by him
>for a couple of tackles and a sack.

Reggie did not get any sacks in the game, and was only credited with two
tackles and one assist.  I don't remember him ever "blowing" past Williams,
and I assure you, I was watching the game very carefully.  I think that
Williams did a fantastic job on probably the best pass rusher in the game
today.

I'm not defending the OPotW award, just trying to straighten things out.
Personally, I think the award should go to Emmitt.  Or, maybe Troy.  Or,
maybe Kelvin. :^)  This is a joke, BTW, for the humor-impaired out there
(except for the part about Emmitt).

Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: daled@meaddata.com (Dale Drummond)
Subject: Re: They might be faking it...
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 17:21:58 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro

In article <910427m.63.721319824@ace.acadiau.ca>, 910427m@ace.acadiau.ca (JASON MATTHEW MCDONALD) writes:
|> 
|> 
|> I was watching the Bengals/Bears game last night on TSN, which was carrying 
|> the ESPN broadcast, and I heard possibly the stupidest comment I've ever 
|> actually heard while watching football.
|> 
|> Picture this.  Bears winning by a fair margin ( 14 I think), 2nd Half
|> Bengels have the ball on or about their 45 yard line. 
|> It's fourth down.
|> 1 to go.
|> The Bengals line up to go for it.
|> The ever so intelligent ESPN reporter says;
|> 'They're going to go for it, or at least fake it'
|> 
|> FAKE IT?????  What the hell does FAKE IT mean.  How the HELL to you fake 
|> going on a fourth down?  I don't know, maybe this guy sees something I don'
|> t.  But if you ask me, it's just plain stupidity.
|> 
I think he was referring to the "line up like you're going for it, and try
to draw the defense off-sides" play.  Then, if you don't draw them, punt
it.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dale Drummond          		"Well, no use crying over 
daled@meaddata.com		 spilled mitochondria." -- Ren
...!uunet!meaddata!daled		


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood)
Subject: POOL - Picks for Week #11
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 15:49:33 GMT

Week 11
-------

PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK THE FORM BEFORE MAILING IT!

Mail this form to davewood@cs.colorado.edu with the word "picks" in the
subject line.  Be sure to choose one and only one team for each game.  Mark
your choice with an 'x' in the appropriate box.  Put your initials after the
word "Initials:" (ON THE SAME LINE!) at the bottom of the form.  If you have
questions about this form, send them with the subject "fbproblem."  If you
still need to sign up, YOU MUST SEND A SEPARATE MESSAGE with the word
"signup" in the subject line.  Do not reply to this message unless it is to
send in your picks.  See the Rules/Signup post for more information.

WEIGHTS: Assign 10 points to 4 different games.
	 Assign  7 points to 5 different games.
	 Assign  5 points to 5 different games.

This form is due at 10 am PST (5 pm GMT) on Sunday, Nov 15.  NO EXCEPTIONS!

DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE!

 WT  Away                       Home
*------------------------------------------------*
[  ] [ ] Detroit		[ ] Pittsburgh       
[  ] [ ] LA Rams		[ ] Dallas           
[  ] [ ] Philadelphia		[ ] Green Bay (at Milwaukee) 
[  ] [ ] Phoenix		[ ] Atlanta          
[  ] [ ] Washington		[ ] Kansas City   
[  ] [ ] Cincinnati		[ ] NY Jets       
[  ] [ ] Houston		[ ] Minnesota        
[  ] [ ] New England		[ ] Indianapolis 
[  ] [ ] San Diego		[ ] Cleveland      
[  ] [ ] Chicago		[ ] Tampa Bay        
[  ] [ ] New Orleans		[ ] San Francisco
[  ] [ ] Seattle		[ ] LA Raiders       
[  ] [ ] NY Giants		[ ] Denver         
[  ] [ ] Buffalo		[ ] Miami            
                                
Initials: 

DID YOU PUT YOUR INITIALS ON THE SAME LINE AS THE WORD INITIALS???  PLEASE DO!

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Rex Wood -- davewood@cs.colorado.edu -- University of Colorado at Boulder
  BRONCOS!!        R.S.F.P. Internet Football Pool Organizer        BRONCOS!!
                            Owner, Boulder Houlders
From: caeser@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Robert Michael Trotter)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Koontz Computer Predictions Week 10
Keywords: computer predictions, picks
Date: 10 Nov 92 05:28:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: uwm.1dnha2INNsr5
Distribution: rec
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1253@fozzy.UUCP> ckoontz@fozzy.UUCP (Carl H. Koontz) writes:
>I have been working on some NFL prediction software and I thought I
>would share my information with you.  I have been monitoring my results
>so far this year and through the first half of the season my algorithm
>is 83-29 against the spread.
>
>Here are my picks for this week
>
>
>Minnesota 10
>Tampa Bay 38
>
	Yeah, right. Try 35-7 Minnesota.
	I mean come on, How did you get these numbers?

>New Orleans  13
>New England  14
>
	Please.

>Cleveland 13
>Houston   24
>
	Bzzt.

>LA Raiders  14
>Philadelphia 17
>
	Not even close here.

>Miami        23
>Indianapolis 24
>
	Huh? I figure no one could get this many wrong.
	Sarcasm? Thats all I can figure....

>Washington  3
>Seattle     7
>
	Wow, are you fading in and out of reality...?
>
>Pittsburgh   3
>Buffalo      38
>
	Bzzt.

>San Diego    13
>Kansas City  15
>
>Cincinnati 28
>Chicago    27
>
	Unbeleivable. You got one.

>San Francisco  40
>Atlanta        41
>
	Bzzt. SF 41 ATL 3

>Comments welcome.

	Yea, if you are serious, your predicter sucks.

	Mark
	GO VIKINGS!
From: jawebb@hydra.unm.edu (james webb)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:06:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: lynx.ayaq5n+
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <BILLMS.92Nov9145443@gip.eecs.umich.edu> billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>In article <92314.125028JJS158@psuvm.psu.edu> JJ Serowik <JJS158@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>
>   Seems to me that Emmitt is Without a Doubt, the best RB in the league!
>   Seems to me, he singlehandedly(Sp?) whupped the Eagles D into a Coma by
>continually pounding them in the head! Seems to me, anyone who gains 163 yards
>agains a stingy Defense like the Eagles deserves it!  How many yards did Foster
>   have that week?  And who were they playing?  Doesn't sound to me like Emmitt
>   has any competition!  Thanx for the future flames:)
>
>Agreed.  Emmitt is king stud #1, most importantly because he does it behind
>such a low quality OL.

	What?! Are you on drugs? Did you not see the Cowboy offensive line
hold off the vaunted Eagle D-line, even dominating them at certain points 
in the game? The Cowboy O-line is looking very good and doing a good job
of opening holes for Emmitt to run through. They were the least penalized 
line in the league lasty year, and have a good chance of repeating that
this year. Sound high-quality to me. Get a clue.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James Webb						   jawebb@leo.unm.edu

Go Dolphins!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Go Cowboys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sdarive@eng.clemson.edu (Siva Darivemula)
Subject: Re: Indoor vs. Outdoor (was Re: WIZARD PREDICT
Reply-To: sdarive@eng.clemson.edu
Organization: College of Engineering, Clemson Univ.
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 19:12:06 GMT

In article 23976@linus.mitre.org, lewis@aera8700.mitre.org (Keith Lewis) writes:
>In article <Ueyp_Ei00WDK45moMA@andrew.cmu.edu>, Vernon H Harmon <vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>>> Key Matchup -               Pittsburgh at Buffalo        Buffalo by 3
>>>                     It sure is tough to win in Buffalo in sub-freezing
>>> 		temps.  Pittsburgh in spot for big let down!
>>
>>No offense (and no flame) intended but just what the hell do you think
>>the weather is like in Pittsburgh, eh? Take my word for it: it ain't
>>toasty! :)
>
>Is the Steelers home field indoors or outdoors?  Does anybody have a list of
>who plays indoors and who plays outdoors?  This data should become more of a
>factor as the weather gets colder.
>
>Keith Lewis             klewis@mitre.org          "Mr. Cheap"
>I don't dance to music; music dances to me.  Email me for my PGP key.
>The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer.


As far as my knowledge goes, Steelers play at the Three rivers stadium which is outdoors.


-Siva
From: arth@sudshead.EBay.Sun.COM
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: betting on football in vegas
Date: 11 Nov 1992 17:34:34 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems
Distribution: world
Reply-To: arth@sudshead.EBay.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: sudshead.ebay.sun.com


Bet either denver -3.5, rams +13.5, detroit +10, san diego +1.5 or
seattle +13

The last two weeks any team that was an underdog by 10 or more covered.
I'm taking Rams, detroit and seattle in a 3 way parlay.

art
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dmg@mo.cs.wm.edu (Daniel M. German)
Subject: Re: Seahawk fan
Organization: College of William & Mary, founded 1693
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 13:41:00 GMT

In article <wjcqg4+@lynx.unm.edu>, jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund) writes:
|> In article <BxJ1vD.B4n@acsu.buffalo.edu> v050j5h4@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Steven H Todman) writes:
|> >
|> >     Since a poll has been taken of Seahawk Fans, I wanted to be counted.
|> >
|> >                                  -Steve (a frustrated fan)
|> 
|> Add one more to the list.
|> 
|> -Eric Jaderlund
|>  jade@triton.unm.edu

One more.

-- 
Daniel M. German
dmg@cs.wm.edu