HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cb366@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark B. Bendiksen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 7 Sep 1992 19:22:30 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


Robert Church writes:

>In article <elambert.715465765@qualcom> elambert@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Eber
>Lam:

>>But in the Mel family the ULTIMATE worst was the movie Marty Feldman
>>did with Louise Lasser around 81.... cant remember the name but Marty played
>>a monk who broke his vow of silence... Is was so bad that my wife and I

>But what about the line, (with Peter Boyle playing an alchoholic priest 
>as he offers a swig of cheap wine to Feldman) "You'll be amused by it's
>humility".                             
>I remember an article pointing out that several members of the cast died
>of sudden cancers just after this film. I can't remember the name of it
>just now though.


I think the movie you're thinking of is _In God We Trust_. It
also had a cameo appearance by Richard Pryor playing God. It was
a pretty bad movie, as I recall....


Mark b. Bendiksen
cb366@freenet.cwru.edu
-- 
"If we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto,
 We'll just be bogus, too."-- Dr. Jeff Spicolli
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: iroderic@alfred.carleton.ca (Ian Roderick)
Subject: Re: REALLLLLLY bad embarassing movies
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 15:35:13 GMT

In <gunnarh.92.716192316@dhhalden.no> gunnarh@dhhalden.no (GUNNAR HORRIGMO) writes:

>In article <18nr8aINNpid@network.ucsd.edu> ivy@chem.ucsd.edu (Ivy Blumberg) writes:
>>From: ivy@chem.ucsd.edu (Ivy Blumberg)
>>Subject: Re: REALLLLLLY bad embarassing movies
>>Date: 10 Sep 1992 15:56:58 GMT
>>
>>I can't believe noone has mentioned "Pink Flamingos"
>>Talk about revolting! 
>>
>That's just what makes it so good.

>------G

Hooray for John Waters and his celebration of the tasteless.  Have you
seen _Polyester_?  Wonderful vulgarity.  BTW, Waters is also someone
who keeps a stable of actors.



Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: merlyn@ora.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
	<1992Sep11.182957.8093@nntpserver.chevron.com>
	<1992Sep11.214217.13315@news2.cis.umn.edu>
Organization: Stonehenge Consulting Services; Portland, Oregon, USA
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 06:26:01 GMT

In article <1992Sep11.214217.13315@news2.cis.umn.edu> donnell@squid.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous) writes:
   >BOLERO with Bodacious Bo Derek.  WHat a piece of trash.

   Yeah, even worse than her "Tarzan of the Apes" and that is saying something.

OK, as long as we're naming dumb Bo Derek movies, let me put in my
vote for "Ghosts Can't Do It".  No, Bo, they certainly can't.  Some
old greek guy (name slips my mind at 1am) talks to former wife (Bo)
from beyond the grave telling her that he will re-inhabit some body so
that she can make love to him again.  Deep sigh.

Why is it that Bo can make lovemaking look sooooo boring?  Sheesh.
Maybe I just have a better set of fantasies about Bo than John Derek
does. :-) (Hey, John, come make a video with *me* and your wife. :-)

Enough.  It's getting warm in here. :-)

Just another video producer, and collector of things odd,

--
Randal L. Schwartz / Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095
merlyn@reed.edu (guest account) merlyn@ora.com (better for permanent record)
cute quote: "Welcome to Portland, Oregon -- home of the California Raisins!"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: hopkins@agora.rain.com (Scott Hopkins)
Subject: Re: Dracula
Organization: Open Communications Forum
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 05:59:35 GMT

In article <1992Sep11.053957.19100@equalizer.cray.com> billd@cray.com (Bill Davidson) writes:
>In article <715706444.7546.0@unix6.andrew.cmu.edu> Gaurang Hirpara <gh1r+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>>Re: Winona playing Lucy 
>> She's not. She plays Mina. Lucy gets offed early on in the book doesn't she?
>
>It's true that Ryder plays Mina.
>
>My copy of Dracula is 372 pages and Lucy dies on page 158 so her human
>life ends just a little before the halfway point.  Her undead form gets
>it on page 212, a bit after the halfway point.  Is that considered
>early?
>
>--Bill
It is if you consider the action that follows it.  

BTW, sounds like a *Spoiler*, better watch what you type.

	-Casey


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: HF.SKW@forsythe.stanford.edu (Susan Wandling)
Subject: Siesta Comments
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 19:03:08 GMT

In  Item: rec.arts.movies 148827
trm@sactoh0.sac.ca.us (Tara R. Marchand)

writes:


I just finished watching _Siesta_, which stars Ellen Barkin,
Gabriel Byrne,
Julian Sands, and Jodi Fostr.  Isabella Rosselini, Martin Sheen, Grace
Jones, and Alexei Sayle also appear.  The film chronicles te disorientation
a woman experiences after waking up alone in the desert.  Bit by bit, she
remembers the events of the past few days, wandering around in a daze.  She
is helped along by some other foreigners and finally manages to recall all
that transpired.

I enjoyed the film; I found it similar to something David Lynch might make.
I was wondering about other people's opinions of the movie.  Did you like
it?  Why or why not?  What were the best and worst parts of the film?

Saw this a couple years ago.  Kinda fascinating.  (Side note:
aren't Byrne & Barkin married/divorced/separated and/or parenting
together?)  (Another side note:  Wasn't Byrne incredible in
"Miller's Crossing", and did he get any recognition at all for his
performance?)  I think Barkin's really cool.   Now in retrospect, it
reminds me quite a bit of:  POSSIBLE SPOILER










Jacob's Ladder.   In both movies what intrigued me was the whole
dying dream sequence, the meshing of conscious and unconscious.  It
is not a favorite theme in movies for some people, my husband for
instance, but like I said, it fascinates me.  I'll have to look up
who directed Siesta, I don't remember.  Another side note:  I think
Byrne and Sands play Byron and Shelley in another movie (or was it
in this one?  lots of intertextuality it seemed.)  Oh well.  I'd
like to read some other reactions to Siesta as well.

Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27882 alt.cult-movies:7963
From: vnelson@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Gerald Vernon Nelson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 15 Sep 92 01:41:40 GMT
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada


>fajack@cc.usu.edu writes:

>>	Anyway, I swear that I'll never to go another Steven King's adaptation
>>movie.  I guess Misery is just a fluke of all those BAD BAD Steven King's
>>adapation.

>Brice Dowaliby writes:
>Christine stank, certainly, but the opening scene on the assembly line
>(with Bad_to_the_Bone as the music) was great fun.

I thought misery was good, Christine was passable..

When I think of STINK, I think "Maximum Overdrive"

Vern Nelson
From: Harv@cup.portal.com (Harv R Laser)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Testing.. sorry.
Date: Sat,  5 Sep 92 15:28:50 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: usa

Humble apologies, but I gotta test something.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jpehko@cs.joensuu.fi (Juha Pehkonen)
Subject: Re: Anthony Perkins: Aids: Died yesterday.
Keywords: aids,physcho
Organization: University of Joensuu
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 11:49:52 GMT

Everytime someone famous dies of AIDS the only thing people can think of is
'How did he/she get it?' which in other words means 'Was he/she a gay?'

Juha Pehkonen
jpehko@cs.joensuu.fi

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jwa@vipunen.hut.fi (Jyrki J Wahlstedt)
Subject: Re: howard's end...GYUCK!
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Date: 11 Sep 92 01:39:31

In article <1992Sep9.92410.16926@ms.uky.edu> fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis) writes:

> rcbi27@marshall.wvnet.edu (DBRUM) writes:
> >Just saw HOWARD'S END. Gyuck! Drivel. Nothing to it. Beautifully filmed
> >outline for a movie, but no real movie. I can't believe it got ****!
> >
> Don't believe this for a second. A very nice piece of work. It bops
> right along and manages a very complicated plot without pausing for
> breath. Very fine acting, particularly Vanessa Redgrave in a minor
> role. 

  Well!!! Better just have a look at it yourself. I saw it and I did
  NOT like it! The characters were not credible, their actions (some
  of them) were not credible AND I abhor movies with slow motion.
--
!
!	Jyrki Wahlstedt
!		Jyrki.Wahlstedt@hut.fi
!
!  Our life is no dream, but it should and will perhaps become one.
!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: donnell@sponge.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: none
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 17:06:11 GMT

In article <1992Sep7.002716.10909@news.Hawaii.Edu> teshima@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (A. Lani Teshima) writes:
>In article <jorngh.3@dhhalden.no> jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN) writes:
>>>In article <1992Aug31.215528.29891@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> mlh@eddy.austin.
>>ibm.com (Mike Haskell) writes:>>
>>>> What is the most embarassing movie you have ever seen?  (What I mean by
>>>> embarassing, is that you feel absolutely miniscule when the lights come
>>>> up and you HAVE to walk out of the theater with every other bonehead
>>>> who bought a ticket to this turkey).  Movies on video don't count as
>>>> your stupidity is hidden by the walls of your house. :-)
>>
>>Has anyone seen 'KISS Meets Phantom Of The Park' ? I mean, can a movie
>>sink any deeper ? I saw this film in my teens when I kinda liked the
>>groups music. GEEZ, I was ashamed when I left the theatre ...
>>
>>(looking back, I think the movie was so pathetic that it was _almost_
>> funny.)
>
>Yeah, it was pretty smelly. But as a loyal member of the Kiss Army at
>the time, I _had_ to see it, you understand. However, I always thought
>this was not a theatrical release, but something like a ABC Movie of
>the Week. Was I incorrect?
>
>
>
>
>--
>A. Lani Teshima (teshima@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.edu)       o | /_/_/ "Sea Hare"
>Student, UH School of Library & Information Studies     o|<0_0>--------*
>A small mind is easily filled with faith.                 \=^-| |____| | 
>Blessed is a mind too small for doubt.                        \_}B   \_}B

It was indeed a "Sunday Night NBC Movie", but it was relelased to theatres
outside America, and also to some revival houses.

					--Judex--

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: kaufman@eecs.nwu.edu (Michael L. Kaufman)
Subject:  Wallace Shawn (Was Re: <None>)
Organization: EECS Department, Northwestern University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:14:42 GMT

fgn@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (frank.g.neves) writes:
>> > INCONCEIVABLE!
>Shouldn't that be "Incontheivable!" ?  Wallace Shawn's lisp is a definite
>part of the characters he plays; it should be left intact at all times.
>Frank (A Wallace Shawn fan)

Ditto. Love that voice. His best line ever was in _My Dinner With Andre_; "If
a tree didn't have roots, it wouldndn't be a tree, it would be a log!"

Michael

-- 
Michael Kaufman | I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on
 kaufman        | fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in
  @eecs.nwu.edu | the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be
                | lost in time - like tears in rain. Time to die.     Roy Batty
From: t9014201@phillip.edu.au
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 8 Sep 92 02:17:32 GMT
Organization: RMIT (Bundoora Campus)

In article <1992Sep3.204134.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au>, c8643631@cc.newcastle.edu.au (I AM NOT ON DRUGS. HONEST. I WAS BORN THIS WAY.) writes:
>>>In article <1992Aug31.215528.29891@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> mlh@eddy.austin.ibm.com (Mike Haskell) writes:
>>>>
>>>> What is the most embarassing movie you have ever seen?  (What I mean by
>>>> embarassing, is that you feel absolutely miniscule when the lights come
>>>> up and you HAVE to walk out of the theater with every other bonehead
>>>> who bought a ticket to this turkey).  Movies on video don't count as
>>>> your stupidity is hidden by the walls of your house. :-)
>> 
> 
> Easy. 'Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves'. I found this the most boring piece of
> tripe I have ever seen on the big screen. The only reason I stayed until the
> very end was because I knew some big-name actor played the part of King Richard
> but I couldn't remember who it was. (I also have an aversion to wasting money.
> I paid, dammit, I'm going to watch it all) Needless to say, Sean Connery's 30
> seconds were not worth the wait. I know I'm in a minority, but I was bored from
> the moment the first person spoke.
-- 

I saw this with a girl who squealed and put her hands over her eyes and 
generally carried on thru the entire movie.
I thought the movie was kinda predicatable, but watching HER do all that
nonsense was alot of fun.  So from that angle, it was a great movie.
  
--
* Clouds...  Love...  Stars... Colours... *
                                     Greg McPherson * T9014201@phillip.edu.au
From: phd85@keele (D.H. Holden)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Dracula
Date: 14 Sep 92 18:39:08 GMT
Organization: Keele University, England

Hi,
   Does anyone know the release date for this
   movie. (Dracula).
	  Dave.

--
Dave.
phd85@uk.ac.keele.seq1
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: daf31428@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (David A. Fleming)
Subject: Re: THREE NONREVIEWS: LITTLE NEMO; RAPID FIRE; STAYED TUNED
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 20:02:43 GMT

frankm@microsoft.com (Frank R.A.J. Maloney) writes:

>Following are three non-reviews:

>################################################

>LITTLE NEMO: ADVENTURES IN SLUMBERLAND is an animated
>feature film, directed by Masami Hata and William Hurtz and
>written by Chris Columbus and Richard Outten. The voices are
>provided by Mickey Rooney, Rene Auberjonois, and Gabriel
>Damon. Rated G.

>Little Nemo was the great, landmark creation of Winsor
>McCay, who was one the most popular, most influential
>cartoonists in American history. McCay can also be
>considered the father of animation due to his pioneering
>animated cartoon "Gertie the Dinosaur." "Little Nemo" ran in
>newspapers for two decades and was immensely popular. Today,
>we can only look at those strips in wonder and amazement
>and with no little sadness at the degradation of the medium
>in our niggardly times.

>It was because of my admiration for McCay (who also authored
>the surreal strip "Dreams of the Rarebit Fiend") that I had
>to see this animated film. The film successfully recreates
>much of McCay's art style, eerie, monumental dream imagery
>full of surprise, wit, and irrational juxtapositions.
>Unfortunately, despite the presence of some important
>talent, the filmmakers hedged their bet with a number of
>non-McCay intrusions. Little Nemo himself is too cute; the
>mischief making trickster too nice; there's a flying squirrel
>buddy; there's a major steal from the "Night on Bare
>Mountain" sequence in FANTASIA; and there is a throw-away
>score of songs by the same Sherman Brothers who wrote the
>songs for MARY POPPINS. Unfortunately, the filmmakers
>ignored the Victor Herbert Broadway version of Little Nemo,
>a smash hit of the 1908 season.

>Overall, I found the film charming and engaging, probably
>not entirely appropriate for the youngest children, and can
>recommend it to you at matinee prices or as a future video
>rental or purchase.

	You also have to take into account that the version showing in US
theaters is roughly 1/2 hour shorter than the version originally shown in
Japan roughly three years ago.
	As I haven't seen either version, just compared the running times, I
can't give any specifics on the material that was deleted.  Sorry.

			Dave Fleming
			daf31428@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu

Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:26909 alt.tv.twin-peaks:2591
From: ace@eisley.wa.com (Ace of Death)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (*MAJOR SPOILERS*)
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 92 15:46:43 PDT
Organization: Mos Eisley Spaceport BBS

lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble) writes:

> kosts@ursa.calvin.edu (Steven Koster) writes:
> 
> 
> >>> In the train car, an angel appears and saves Ronette Pulaski.  The
> >>> angel appears later in the red room (?)  
> >>
> >> The angel is Laura. 
> >
> > No, no, no. The angels are not Laura, Annie, or anyone else we know.  
> 
> I really hate to disappoint you, Steven, but you're *wrong*.  There's a
> still of the "angel-in-the-train-car" scene in the booklet of the soundtrack
> CD and it's definitely, unmistakably Laura.
> 
> Go watch the movie again.
> 

I don't want to be rude but the none of the angels are Laura.

There are seperate listings in the credits for each angel and neither one 
is Laura. I believe that these are the angel that "left" Laura's picture 
earlier on.  Laura "got her angel back" at the end with the help of 
Cooper.  This includes the fore/back shadowing presence of Annie who 
tells Laura to wright in her Diary, which Cooper finds and helps her.
Yes I know it's confusing but that makes it great, IMHO.

I manage a movie theatre that is playing this film so please don't tell 
me that I must be mistaken.

If there are any questions about specific parts of the film that anyone 
wants to know I'll be happy to check for you.

I think the scene at the end where her angel comes back is the most 
powerful in the film.

Thanx

Bye For Now...
           ___  ____  ____           ____   ____     ___  _____  _   _
  /\      /   |/  __||  __|         |  _ \ |  __|   /   ||_   _|| | | |
 /  \    / /| || |   | |__   __  __ | | \ || |__   / /| |  | |  | |_| |
(    )  / __  || |__ | |__  |  ||_  | |_/ || |__  / __  |  | |  |  _  |
 ~/\~  /_/  |_|\____||____| |__||   |____/ |____|/_/  |_|  |_|  |_| |_|
  ~~                ace@eisley.wa.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mstede@cs.toronto.edu (Manfred Stede)
Subject: Re: Prospero's Books (was Re: Most <pejorative adjective> Movie)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Date: 8 Sep 92 15:06:37 GMT

nichols@math.umn.edu (Preston Nichols) writes:

>Another question: Can anyone identify (or discuss!) any art-historical  
>influences or references (or jokes) in Prospero's Books or any other Greenaway  
>stuff?

Specifically, I always wondered about the huge paintings that decorate the
restaurant in "Cook, Thief, Wife, Lover" -- what are they, what do they
signify? 

-manfred
Organization: Sophomore, Music, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.theatre
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 23:54:11 -0400 
From: Justin Newcomb Grize <jg4q+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: A movie version of Les Mis???

God, I hope not.
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27304 alt.cult-movies:7677
From: chrisc@sun.pcl.ac.uk (Chris Chamberlain)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: 'Arthur' King of the Badly Dubbed Britons (was Re: Most Embarassing Movie)
Date: 10 Sep 92 10:30:25 GMT
Organization: Polytechnic of Central London

In article <1992Sep3.155858.5666@riacs.edu> howells@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (John Howells) writes:
>k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (ce) writes:
>
><Talking about "Excalibur" got me to thinking about the actor who portrayed 
><Arthur. I can't recall seeing him in *anything* after that film came out.
><Admittedly, Excalibur was not a great calling-card for the man's acting
><skills but one would have thought he could have gotten a job *somewhere*
><(teenage-slasher, running around naked in a Greenaway film :). Can some
><wise TriviaLord out there fill us in on his career (and his name too)?
>
>The great Shakespearian actor Nicol Williamson, famous for his stage
>version of Hamlet, among others. Great actor, but has a reputation for
>being very hard to get along with. He has appeared in many films, but I
>believe he mostly confines his work to the stage.
>
>--
>                                        John Howells
>                                        howells@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov 
>                                        howells@earth.arc.nasa.gov


I think there's a bit of confusion here, Nicol Williamson played Merlin and
I believe he made a few black and white films in the 50's and 60's, although
he does do mostly stage work. Nigel Terry played Arthur and he did seem to
disappear after Excalibur, although he was in Derek Jarmans Edward II
recently and he was in something on TV here in the UK recently the name of
which I can't remember (Cherie Lunghi who played Guinevere was also in it).

Chris.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: arkhive@apusapus.demon.co.uk (Ailsa Jenkins)
Subject: TV movies versus TV pilots
Distribution: world
Organization: QLA - Quantum Leap Anonymous
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 21:24:28 +0000

Could someone enlighten me, please?

What is the difference between TV movies and pilots? Do pilots become TV
movies if they are unsuccesful?
____________________________________________________________________
Ailsa R Jenkins (arkhive@apusapus.demon.co.uk)
134 Frankland Road, Croxley Green, RICKMANSWORTH, Herts, WD3 3AU, UK

`I got me a mirror, and looked at my face and said, "Ain't life a bitch."'
    Ted Klausterman in "3 Guys Naked from the Waist Down"

 Gun till do cheum, as gach cearn, fo rionnag-iuil an dachaidh.
From: peterme@ocf.berkeley.edu (Peter Merholz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Anthony Perkins: Aids: Died yesterday.
Date: 14 Sep 1992 02:36:49 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
NNTP-Posting-Host: earthquake.berkeley.edu
Keywords: aids,physcho

>> This is the first occurance of a famous person contracting the disease
>> and having it run it's course and the media NOT making a show of it.
>
>Not at all. Off hand, I can only think of Brad Davis, but there have been many
>others.                                   ^^^^ ^^^^^

Brad who? I think that's the point of the first post, which is that
Perkins was a bona fide movie star (if for nothing beyond Psycho, which
is definitely plenty)...

Does anyone say how he got the virus? I heard he had a wife and kids,
but as we know, that doesn't mean he wasn't gay or bi... Just curious...
<Because I seriously doubt he received it in heterosexual union, considering
the odds against it... It would be unwise to further scare the heterosexual
population about AIDS since the odds are still phenomenally against 
transmitting it heterosexually...>

--Peter M.
From: rtravsky@news.uwyo.edu (Rich Travsky)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: King Kong & the Empire State Building
Date: 10 Sep 92 22:57:17 MST
Distribution: world
Organization: Banzai Institute

When King Kong was made in 1933, the Empire State Building was the
tallest building anywhere, a distinction it enjoyed for many years.

I recently purchased a copy of Andreas Feininger's "New York in the
40s" (photos of New York in the 1940s). There are two pictures of 
the ESB, one taken from 14 miles away, the other from 8 miles away.
The ESB stands up on the horizon like a giant. Had Kong been real
and climbed the ESB, he and the planes that shot him down would've been
visible for miles and miles.

We're used to skyscrapers and I'm sure the marvel of such a building 
was greater then than now. Truly a fitting setting for the film's
climax.

+------------+    Richard Travsky   RTRAVSKY @ CORRAL.UWYO.EDU
|            |    Division of Information Technology
|            |    University of Wyoming
|        U W |    (307) 766 - 3663 / 3668
|         *  |    "Wyoming is the capital of Denver." - a tourist
+------------+    "One of those square states." - another tourist
Home state of Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense of these here UNITED STATES!
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27136 rec.arts.sf.movies:6954