HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL3]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 1696
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 7 Jan 1993 16:16:49 +0200
From:         david@TINTIN.CSL.SNI.BE
Subject:      Re

> Hi everybody!
> In recent days some of you sent the notes about C++ programmer's guides.
> I used to write DOS apps in C++, but since I started to
> work with Windows (some six months ago) I turned back to "normal" C.
> At the beggining I was using OWL, but huge overhead and long compilation
> were very annoying. Then I tried to use my own C++ objects  (without OWL),
> but came to the conclusion that it's a little bit unnatural since window
> classes themselves give a kind of object oriented programming. After getting
> Petzolt's "Programming Windows 3.1" and decided to use pure C model that
> he shows.
> I haven't got any of those books about C++ programming for Windows and all
> I did with C++ objects were just my experiments.
> I'd like to know your opinions about C++ and C programming for Windows.
>
> Adam
>
> amichali@ii.uj.edu.pl

        Hi Adam,


        It seems that the wedding between Windows and C++ is a delicate
one ! The problem lies essentialy in the fact that there is no easy way
to tie a Windows message with a C++ method. Microsoft uses the "message
map" mechanism which is a little bit unnatural. Borland proposes a more
natural approach, but has modified the way C++ handles  virtual  tables
to achieve it.

        Build a class hierarchy for Windows is not an easy task. I have
read many books and articles on the subject. If I can make a suggestion
take the time to read :

"Windows++, Writing Reusable Code in C++" by Paul Dilascia,
Addison Wesley (ISBN : 0-201-60891-X)

and

"The Microsoft Guide to C++ Programming" by Kaare Christian,
Microsoft Press (ISBN : 1-55615-394-5)

        The benefit of using C++ to program Windows is incontestable ...

David (brabant@cls.sni.be)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  JNET%"win3-l@uicvm"
Original_cc:  KNOPF
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 08:52:00 CST
From:         KNOPF@FNAL.BITNET
Subject:      Re: MOUSE won't move after set up?

>> ... If I remeber
>> correctly, you should remove your mouse driver, then install windows, and
>> windows will install it's own mouse driver (MOUSE.SYS) for you.
>
>There shouldn't be any need for this--don't reinstall Win3.1.  The driver
>can be found on the installation disks in "most" cases.

 Don't forget to uncompress the file, i.e.:

C:>expand a:\mouse.sy_ c:\windows\system\mouse.sys

 Walter Knopf
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 18:46:23 -0800
From:         "Darryl G. Hosford" <dhosfor@EIS.CALSTATE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Converting between graphics formats (fwd)

Someone was asking about a program to convert amoung various graphic
formats:

The best shareware program that I have seen is Paint Shop (I have  ver 2.02)

It supports: BMP, GIF, IMG, MAC, PCX, PIC, RLE, TIFF, and WPG.

Good luck.

Darryl
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: IUPUI Student Activities Office (317) 274-3931
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 8 Jan 1993 10:05:53 EST
From:         "NATHAN BRINDLE" <NBRINDLE@INDYCMS.BITNET>
Subject:      Sporadic duplicate postings

Has anyone else been getting these?  I've had about 10 in the last 2 days
from WIN3-L.  Either someone is posting twice or LISTSERV is sending them
out twice...not terrible, but annoying.

Thanks.

-----------------------------------------------------BITNET:  NBRINDLE@INDYCMS
Nathan C. Brindle, Student Activities Office
Staff Advisor, ALPHA PHI OMEGA, TAU OMICRON CHAPTER
Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis
Internet:    NBRINDLE@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU
Compu$erve:  71461.2471@COMPUSERVE.COM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 6 Jan 1993 18:41:07 -0700
From:         Mike Lieberman <cwmliebe@ANTELOPE.WCC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: UNICOM

On Wed, 6 Jan 1993, Bin Zhang wrote:

> Anyone knows where I can get UNICOM for Windows?  I heard it has a
> call-waiting protection feature.  any comment on that?  Thanks in advance.

I tried the call waiting feature on my Cardinal v.32bis external and it
didn't help at all.  I got dumped off a session within a couple of minutes
after connecting.

You can find uc3g-1.zip on cica in pub/pc/win3/util. There is a a 3h
around somewhere but I'm not sure.


**********************************************************************
* Michael Lieberman              Internet: cwmliebe@antelope.wcc.edu *
*                                Voice Phone: 307-856-9096           *
* In the next world,             Direct Data Line: 307-856-3601      *
* you're on your own.      Snail:418 Westchester, Riverton, WY  82501*
**********************************************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 4 Jan 1993 22:43:19 EST
From:         Anne Liang <GOVE036@TWNMOE10.BITNET>
Subject:      How to get the lost 384K Extended Memory back

Hi,

I have a 386DX-33 machine with 4MB RAM, PhoenixBBIOS ROM dated 90/?/?.

When I boot the machine, it reported 640 Base Memory, 3072K Extended.
I was wondering where is the 384K gone?  I was heard of SHADOW RAM.
Is it that?  Can I do something to get it back?

Thanks in advance for any advice. Please don't laugh at me.

Anne Liang
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 7 Jan 1993 16:05:17 CST
From:         JCROSS@PRIME.MHSL.UAB.EDU
Subject:      Re: Xtradrv

Espen Haakonsen asks;

>As he could not access the c-drive by booting from drive a: he formatted his
>harddisk to clean out Xtradrv. After doing so he could start from scratch with
>an empty harddisk. The only problem is that Xtradrv has put some information
>in the boot-sector that he was unable to remove. Xtradrv includes a program
>that removes Xtradrv from the harddisk, but this didn't work. An error occurs
>when running this program: Error in Xtradrv Global Bootsector (or something ||)
>When he boots his machine he gets an error message :
> Bad or missing Xtradrv Boot Sector

>Does anyone know how to fix this problem ?

DOS level formatting DOES NOT replace the Master Boot Record (MBR).
The MBR is written by the partitioning utility.  If you have MS-DOS
or IBM-DOS version 5.0 you can issue the command "FDISK /MBR" which
will create a new MBR.

As a rule of thumb, unles you absolutely positively without a doubt
*KNOW* what you're doing don't use *ANY* software that move,
changes, or replaces the MBR.

Hope this helps.

/s/ Jesse Cross
Primary Internet: jcross_pubmail@prime.mhsl.uab.edu
Alternate Internet: slb2007@uabdpo.dpo.uab.edu
Bitnet: slb2007@uabdpo
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
From: fuzzy@netcom.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Subject: Re: VIRUS>> PKZIP 2.04C
Organization: Foxes 'R' Us - Seven locations to serve you
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 07:42:43 GMT

rhughes@ucsd.edu (Richard J. Hughes) writes:

>Norton Desktop virus scan says PKUNZIP.EXE and PKZIPFIX.EXE are contaminated 
>with a strain of Maltese Amoeba virus.

PKWARE has verified that this is a false positive detection by Norton
AntiVirus.  An upgraded version of NAV will not detect this virus within
PKZIP 2.04.

-- 
#ifdef TRUE         | Fuzzy Fox                  fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0   | a.k.a. David DeSimone      an207@cleveland.freenet.edu
#define  FALSE  1   |
#endif              | "911 Emergency Rescue Service - Can you hold, please?"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 4 Jan 1993 16:45:38 MET
From:         "Verheulpen W." <waverheu@VUB.AC.BE>
Subject:      Re: Video driver problem (I think)
              Jan 4, 93 8:46 am

In a posting DAJ@ABS.NLC-BNC.CA writes :
>
>
> On Jan. 1 (tired of football already) I added 4MB of RAM to my home system.
> This brought me up to 8MB total. 486@33MHz, Windows 3.1, ATI WonderXL (1MB)
> video, Seagate 210 MB HDD, NEC 3FGx monitor.
>
> The new RAM is exactly the same as the old, same speed, same 3-chip/SIMM,
> even same manufacturer.
>
> Close up the case, fire up the computer, run the CMOS setup to get the new
> memory info registered, even run QA Plus through 1 cycle of memory testing
> to make sure everything is OK. Checks out OK.
>
> Start Windows. System locks in the middle of initializing the Program Manager
> screen. Hard Boot: get the Program Manager screen, but as soon as I touch the
> mouse, I get a blank screen -- SYSTEM ERROR, Parity error...."
>
> Interesting! I reboot and this time I run QA Plus on the memory for over 2
> etc ... stuff deleted
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> *----------------------------------------------------------------------*
> |     Darryl Johnson                 Internet: DAJ@ABS.NLC-BNC.CA      |
> |     Programmer/Analyst             Voice:    (819) 994-6846          |
> |     National Library of Canada     FAX:      (819) 953-0291          |
> |  ** Personal, not National Library, opinions in ALL cases.... **     |
> *----------------------------------------------------------------------*
>
>
Darryl,
Several sources told me that the 3 chips type ram modules occasionally
cause malfunction problems in fast machines, even if they are 70ns or
less. There seems to be no valid explanation why but it is said that the
parity implementation in this type of chips is the cause of the trouble.
This problem never seems to show with the 9 chips ram modules.
I have seen the experiment of transferring 8Mb ram from a 386DX33 to a
486DX33 the 386 working perfectly well and the 486 even refused to boot!
removing 4meg & testing the remaining 4Meg showed 1 module to be 'defective'.
Putting all memory back in the 386 re-generated a perfectly working machine
with no errors. Frustrating but true, try to interchange the ram modules and
find out which one is generating the trouble.
Good luck !

--
====================================================================
Willy Verheulpen                            Systems Coordination
                   Institute for Molecular Biology
Brussels Free University                                 Belgium
I-------------------------------------I----------------------------I
I Bitnet :   waverheu@bbrbfu60.bitnet I Things tend to get worse   I
I Intern :   waverheu@vub.ac.be       I under pressure (Murphy)    I
I_____________________________________I____________________________I
Usual Disclaimer: No connection with any commercial product.
====================================================================
From: mcholz@cip.ft.uni-erlangen.de (Marc Holz)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: windows 3.1 crashes with adaptec 1542b under drdo 6.0
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 18:52:08 GMT
Organization: FT, University of Erlangen
NNTP-Posting-Host: fauft2.ft.uni-erlangen.de
Summary: windows 3.1 crash with adaptec 1542b under drdos 6.0
Keywords: win 3.1, scsi, crash

I' ve installed an new harddisk micropolis 1539 with an adaptec 1542b scsi
conroller. Now a have two problems:

       - It is impossible to install a permanent swap file
           drive layout :   c: 100mb  -> primary partition
                            d: 200mb  -> extended partition
                            e: 200mb  -> extended partition
                            sco unix partition 500mb
                            
                            
       - win 3.1 is installed on drive c:!
         windows starts without any problems. But if I'm loading 
         some windows programs, even those of the windows distribution
         the system becomes very slow (expanding the temporarly swapfile).
         The problem is, windows crashes with an error message like 
         "progman: emm386 exception error at 0ff0:1212" or so.
         
The system configuration is (reduced):

    drdos 6.0           
    acer 1100/25
    8mb ram
    
    config.sys:     device=aspi4dos.sys
                    device=emm386 ....
                    
    autoexec.bat:   superpck /EM 1024
                    tigacd
                    
                                             
I used win 3.1 without any problems with the same configuraton on a st1144a drive
before. 


MC Holz.
FAU Erlangen Nuernberg
email: mcholz@cip.ft.uni-erlangen.de
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 4 Jan 1993 09:36:56 -0500
Reply-To:     mpelley@kean.ucs.mun.ca
From:         mpelley@KEAN.UCS.MUN.CA
Subject:      still searching for desktop patterns

Hello again,

Well, I tried to reinstall the patterns under the Windows Setup icon, but
there was no mention of the patterns there.  I made sure that there was no
wallpaper in use.  I have a backup of WIN.INI (I'm getting smarter!) and in
it there was a code for a pattern which I place in my current WIN.INI.
This turned out to be the "weave" pattern.  Again, I still had a black edit
screen with no cursor, and it still would not allow me to edit the pattern
(if all black can be considered a pattern).  So there we have it...the case
of the missing patterns.  I _HOPE_ I don't have to reinstall windows (
actually I wouldn't go that far, but you know what I mean.).
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Priority:     normal
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 5 Jan 1993 19:19:57 EDT
From:         LELIO@CCS.UOGUELPH.CA
Subject:      Re: 40,000 copies of a picture

On Tue, 5 Jan 1993 17:06:36 CST

Don Branson <C08922DB@WUVMD.BITNET> wrote

>    In Word for Windows 2.0, I want to create a letterhead document,
> which should include a logo.  The logo is an .EPS file of about 78K.

> The only workable idea I came up with is to create a letterhead
> template, with a macro which inserts the logo at the top of the
> first page, then prints the document, then deletes the logo.  Not
> too clean, but better than nothing.
>
> Anybody got a better idea?

Well, I don't have that much experience with Word, but with
Wordperfect for DOS, I recall one of the options in a graphics box,
be it user or figure or whatever, was to read the file from disk, or
something to that effect, this not only saves space but eliminates
the hassle of updating numerous items/files which use that graphic.

Perhaps Word has a similar feature?  I will ask around and see if I
can find a better solution!


Lelio Fulgenzi
Computing & Communications Services
University of Guelph
Guelph, Ontario
N1G 2W1

Internet: Lelio@SuppServ.CCS.UoGuelph.Ca
Bitnet  : CCSLelio@UoGuelph
Voice   : (519) 824-4120 Ext.8888
Fax     : (519) 767-1620
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l,comp.os.ms-windows.apps
From: swesterback@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi (Sten Westerback, Nokia Telecommunications, FINLAND)
Subject: W4W/WinJPG-problem, W4W label printing?
Organization: Nokia Telecommunications.
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 15:29:24 GMT

Hello everyone, i hope that 1993 has started off nicely.

I have two things concerning W4W (Word for Windows) on my mind:

1. I have noticed a incompatibility problem between WinJPEG 1.5 and W4W 2.0b.
   Suddenly when i was batch converting some GIF:s (why does anyone still use 
   them?) in the background and working in a W4W document i noticed that there
   where no disk activity (the conversion usually do that). I Alt-Tabed over
   to Winjpeg to see what had happened and what i found was this:
      Winjpeg had got a new menu... the same on as the one in W4W !!!!
   Has anyone seen this before? What could be the reason? I had no problems 
   with W4W. I had a DOS-prompt and Reflection2 for Windows started but not
   active. I have a ICL MM5 CL386s/25 with 4M and ATI-SVGA driver (800x600x16).
   I am running DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.1.


2. Is there a better DOT than the maillabl.dot available? What i would need
   is a DOT that prints a given number of address labels for every person in
   the database. The maillabl prints a whole sheet (i.e 16) of labels for every
   person. Or is there a way to tell W4W to print only one label/a row of
   labels for every addressee? You could probably shorten the page lenght to 
   one row but it's not good enough when printing on a laser printer.

   Is there any better program for printing address labels available for 
   Windows or even for DOS?


Please tell me any suggestions that comes into your mind. 
I would prefer mail. I can post a summary here later.

Sten
============================================================================
Sten Westerback (BSc. electronics)          Telephone: +358+0 +5115891(work)
X400      : c=fi, a=Elisa, p=Nokia Telecom, S=Westerback, G=Sten, (u=SWS)
Internet  : swesterback@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi        Time zone : EET (=GMT+3)
Snailmail : Konalantie  12 A16, SF-00370 HELSINKI, FINLAND (EUROPE, EARTH) 
 Test the utility at WSMR-SIMTEL20.Army.mil::pd1:<msdos.dirutl>swxd303d.zip
   Note that i am working, but not speaking for Nokia Telecommunications!
============================================================================
From: pmh2962@tamsun.tamu.edu (Pat Hayes)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: Re: HIMEM and EMM386... *.EXE, not *.sys
Date: 4 Jan 1993 20:05:59 -0600
Organization: Meteorology, TAMU, CS, TX
NNTP-Posting-Host: tamsun.tamu.edu

Sarah wrote:
>either one is acceptable.  Windows just put the emm386 and himem in
>their software since they require them. So when running installation
>it can update the autoexec.bat and config.sys for you without having
>to search through any dos setups.  I would check the dates of each
>and use the latest of each.  They should be the same..... There is one

... yep, you should use the latest version you have.  AND -- yep,
    use the SAME version (same creation date) for EMM, HIMEM,
    SMARTDRIVE, RAMDRIVE, and (while we're at it) MOUSE.
    I got an old version loaded once and it took a while to figure
    out why my system was weirding out.

>exception and that is the emm386.exe as opposed to the emm386.sys;
>I choose the emm386.sys if it's at all possible.  Take all of the

... there hasn't been a EMM386.SYS for a while; it's EMM386.EXE
    in the last couple (win3, dos5, win31, wfw) permutations.
    You still use "DEVICE=EMM386.EXE..." in config.sys even
    tho it's not a *.sys.

>extras when using these programs too.  Load as much as possible high!

... Of course, HIMEM and EMM don't get loaded high;
    but most everything else should.

>Sarah Bush


-- 
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pat Hayes, Meteorology, Texas A&M University...<whoop!>...phayes@tamu.edu 
O&M 1008, TAMU, CS, TX 77843-3150....days:(409)845-1680 fax:(409)862-4466 
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
From: swesterback@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi (Sten Westerback, Nokia Telecommunications, FINLAND)
Subject: Re:Word 4 Windows Header/Footer --> Never-Never Land
Organization: Nokia Telecommunications.
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 08:40:07 GMT

In article <1993Jan2.083151.17870@zip.eecs.umich.edu>, srawson@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Stephen Rawson) writes:
> In article <9212152147.AA19205@e7sa.epi.syr.ge.com> Steve Stern X-2783 <stern@E7SA.EPI.SYR.GE.COM> writes:
>>Has anyone seen this problem?
>>
>>I am running word for windows 2.0 - windows 3.1 - dos 5.0...
>>In word for windows, I have a document open with the header
>>and footer filled in.  Out of the blue, the header and footer are deleted.
>>This happened to me twice - I'm not sure about the first time, but
>>I think both times it happened when I was saving the file.
>>Naturally, the saved file loses the header/footer data.  Bummer!
>>
> I have also had problems with W4W 2.0 Win3.1, Dos 5.0 with file corruption
> Pieces of the file delete themselves as I watch them on the screen.  The
> last time this happened, I had just been working with the Header and
> had attempted to save the file.  Got a GPF.  When I reopened the file, 
> there were a bunch of garbage characters.  These characters moved around
> on the screen without me doing anything.  I closed the file, quit windows
> and looked at the file with Norton 5.0 DiskEditor.  It contained some 
> directory fragments and the first part of the file had been moved to a
> later sector (this part does not show up when viewed with WFW.)
> 
> This is the second time this has happened to me.  I don't know if it's
> Word or something else about my setup.  I also don't know if it's just
> totally ridiculous to have directory fragments mixed in with Word files
> (though I haven't found them in older Word files) or to have pieces of
> the document out of order.  
> 
My experience with W4W has told me never to edit files on diskettes. Is that
possibly what you have been doing? If so, do copy your files to the harddisk
(or ramdisk) and then open them from there. It may also pay of to refresh the
file by copying the whole document from screen to the clipboard, open a new 
document and finally paste the document onto it. W4W seems to bee VERY sensible
to faults in the document file.
If not, i suspect your harddisk might have faults and suggest that you run 
NDD or similar disk checker.

Sten
============================================================================
Sten Westerback (BSc. electronics)          Telephone: +358+0 +5115891(work)
X400      : c=fi, a=Elisa, p=Nokia Telecom, S=Westerback, G=Sten, (u=SWS)
Internet  : swesterback@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi        Time zone : EET (=GMT+3)
Snailmail : Konalantie  12 A16, SF-00370 HELSINKI, FINLAND (EUROPE, EARTH) 
 Test the utility at WSMR-SIMTEL20.Army.mil::pd1:<msdos.dirutl>swxd303d.zip
   Note that i am working, but not speaking for Nokia Telecommunications!
============================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 20:12:55 EST
From:         "Joseph T. Malloy" <jmalloy@ITSMAIL1.HAMILTON.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Good Comms Prog for Win 3.1 Wanted
              Jan 11, 93 10:23 pm

>
> Can any one recomend a good comms prog for windows, currently use odysey
> for dos. Is there a win version of this ?
>
>  //// Kevin Walton                       Tel : 0274 740 580               ////
>  //// Computer Science Student         Email : K.E.WALTON@BRADFORD.AC.UK  ////
>  //// Bradford University         Snail Mail : J6 Kirkstone Halls         ////
>  //// England                                  Bradford, West Yorks,      ////
>
Chac'un a son GUI, as I always say, but I'm quite pleased with
Datastorm's Procomm Plus for Windows.  It's full featured, has quite a
full scripting language complete with the ability to make and use your
own diaglog boxes, and has been utterly reliable for me since I started
using it last June (there were two update files to it, however, and the
current version is 1.01).

I'm sure others will have other favorites, but after using Unicom 3.0
for some months, I'd never go back!

Joseph T. Malloy
German Department
Hamilton College
Clinton, NY/USA
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mts: smtp
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 12:18:29 -0500
From:         Alex Savchenko <savchenk@CGI.COM>
Subject:      RE: MFC for BC++3.1

 >                        +---------------------------------------+
 >                        | Alisson Augusto Souza Sol             |
 >                        +---------------------------------------+
 >                        | e-mail: alisson@dcc.ufmg.br           |
 >                        +---------------------------------------+
>
> I know of the existence of a paper that shows how to use the
> Microsoft Foundation Classes with Borland C++ 3.1.
>  Could anybody send me this paper?
>
>  Thanks in advance.
>
>  Alisson Sol

It's ftp-able from pub/pc/win3/programr/bcpp/mfc-bc.zip on
ftp.cica.indiana.edu (129.79.20.84). If you don't have an ftp access
send one-line mail message containing the word HELP to ftpmail@decwrl.dec.com

Sorry, I don't have this paper ;-)

Alex.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU