HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dblakele@hercules.acpub.duke.edu
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Mark Morrissey -- I've lost your address
Keywords: stupid, scatter-brained, shouldn't be allowed near a computer
Date: 6 Oct 92 20:49:52 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.
Originator: dblakele@raphael.acpub.duke.edu

Mark,

I can't seem to remember the pnw motss mailing list name, and I've lost
your address.  Any email pointers will be helpful.  

[Sorry to have bothered the net with this trifle]

Peace and Hugs


-- 
| Dean D Blakeley, MD            | Internet:dblakele@acpub.duke.edu           |
| Ambulatory Care Service (11C)  | BITNET:blake007@dukemc.mc.duke.edu         |
| Durham VA Medical Center       | FORUM:blakeley,dean d@durham.va.gov        |
| Durham NC 27705                | NeXTMail accepted  #include <disclaim.h>   |
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: fjvwing@cs.vu.nl (FJ!!)
Subject: Re: Ah, Fashion.
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 13:07:55 GMT

glp@fig.citib.com (Greg Parkinson) writes:
>Perhaps body hair secretes some sort of
>butchizing hormone.  

*** Action *** FJ raises eye-brows and thinks 'omygawd, another piece
in my body that is not working properly.'

						FJ!!
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: Toys 'r' Us
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst MA
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 04:25:47 GMT

In article <thaaang.718163185@cwis> thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance) writes:

>nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:
>
>>In article <thaaang.718070247@cwis> thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance) writes:
>>
>>>I just bought my first sex toys a week or so ago (nothing big, just a
>>>cockring)
>
>>which wasn't very big?
>
>Horrid sow. No, actually they got me a great deal on a used o-ring
>from NASA.

The rubber kind that breaks when it gets too cold?  This has
possibilities.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "You are just naive and repressed because
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /  penis envy is here and it's now and it's
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  all around you." -- Neal C. Wickham
From: roger@quantime.co.uk (Roger Phillips)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Superstar! The Karen Carpenter Story
Summary: No.
Date: 30 Sep 92 11:51:45 GMT
Reply-To: roger@quantime.co.uk (Roger Phillips)
Organization: Quantime Ltd, London (software for market research)

In article <1992Sep30.053010.4200@reed.edu>,
nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:
> In article <lche4uINNpjs@spim.mti.sgi.com> dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Brave Jeff Dauber) writes:
> [About Poison]
> >I hated the movie, I thought it was overhyped and not that focussed.
> 
> And I liked the movie, a lot, so there. I want to see his Karen
> Carpenter thing - is it possible to see it?

I heard the Carpenter people heard about it
and took legal action to kill it,
so if you ain't seen it, you ain't seeing it. :-(
-- 
Roger Phillips                            roger@quantime.co.uk
"The best way to find something you've lost is to buy a replacement."
-- Ann Landers
From: jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com (Jake Coughlin)
Subject: Re: Faggots
Originator: jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 19:01:24 GMT
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research

mattm@Apple.COM (Matthew Melmon):
> To *die* for.  They are all to *die* for...

"jump!  JUMP!"
-- 
Queer Without A Cause!
Jason Coughlin ( jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com )
"I find myself suddenly in the world, and I recognize that I have one
right alone: that of demanding human behavior of the other." -- Fanon
From: mike@gordian.com (Michael A. Thomas)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Paul Jabara
Date: 6 Oct 92 23:49:21 GMT
Organization: Gordian; Costa Mesa, CA

In article <1992Oct6.141626.13929@fig.citib.com>, glp@fig.citib.com (Greg Parkinson) writes:
> The mid-70s to early-80s were much more my period of
> scene-making.  I wasn't pretty enough to be good at
> glitter but I did suburban punk real well - I was 
> *threatening*.

  Really? I don't remember you as particularily threatening. Maybe
family was excluded?
-- 

		Michael Thomas	(mike@gordian.com)
	"I don't think Bambi Eyes will get you that flame thrower..."  
		-- Hobbes to Calvin
		USnail: 20361 Irvine Ave Santa Ana Heights, Ca,	92707-5637
		PaBell: (714) 850-0205 (714) 850-0533 (fax)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: "paul bobbitt" <paul.bobbitt@canrem.com>
Subject: civil war in oregon
Reply-To: "paul bobbitt" <paul.bobbitt@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: soc
Date: 2 Oct 92 01:27:57 EST

MM>What is with this *ridiculous* 80,000 people figure?  Do you really
MM>believe that there are 80,000 people out there who give a shit
MM>about soc.motss?  There are *perhaps* two hundred different posters
MM>a month.  But hell, what if we say there are a thousand?  You
MM>seriously believe that for every *one* person who posts, *eighty* just
MM>read?  Well, isn't that precious?  My, what an unusual boy you are,
MM>Mr. Williams.  One in eighty.

Actually, Sysops on GEnie (General Electric Network for Information
Exchange) estimate that only 5% of all readers of any given topic 
actually post to that topic.  Since GEnie is a service people pay
$5.95 per month for, I'd think more of them would be inclined to
post than on the Internet.

Now stop and consider that soc.motss is a group that many people would
feel uncomfortable posting in, and you'll see how the 80,000 figure
might be quite reasonable.  Of course given the acid comments and
rebuttals from people like yourself, I'm really quite surprised that
anyone posts here at all.

Paul D. Bobbitt
---
  DeLuxe 1.25 #7722  Int: paul.bobbitt@canrem.com  GEnie: P.BOBBITT
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: norris@infonode.ingr.com (Jeff Norris)
Subject: Spending some time in St. Louis
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Distribution: soc
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 23:48:47 GMT


I'll be in St. Louis Sept. 27-Oct. 2, and then again several times before 
the end of the year.  Any motsskateers from/in the area have any suggestions
on what to do/see?

-jeff
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
Subject: Re: Ah, Fashion.
Organization: insert anything here
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 17:29:14 GMT

In article <72923@apple.Apple.COM> richard@Apple.COM (a flying squirrel) writes:
>What's in Fashion?  For Men, Smooth Look Goes Integral

	Gross.

	As if we needed more people being "told" that if they
don't look like X their worth is diminished.

	Beauty is internal, not external.  Fashion is
a way for people to make money off of other people's insecurities.
When you "go in for fashion" you're buying this demoralizing
and dehumanizing crap lock, stock and barrel.

	Don't.

	You don't *need* to wax to look good, sexy, interesting, etc.
You don't *need* to be thin, tan, blond, smooth, muscular, young
to have self-worth and to be found attractive by other people.
These things are *traits* not requirements or conditions.

	It's time our community started casting off these things
in favor of liking each other for who we are, not who we're told to be.
We dont' like it when the phobes treat us as things, why are we so 
willing to let GQ/IM/EL/LLBean/etc. to do the same?  

	Admittedly, looksism did provide the mechanism for most of
the bear and G&M community to form out of, mostly for self-preservation,
but these same elements can and do permeate these sub communities.

	The next time you find yourself judging someone because
of how they look/dress/etc... ask yourself: who is telling me
to come to this conclusion?  Then next time you see/hear/read
something telling you "you really want to look like THIS" ask
yourself is that the *only* possibility there is?  The model may
be beautiful, sexy, hot, and wonderful, but so are you.

	We as a society (mainstream) are too fashion-addicted.
We feel we can't "function" without our apparel "drugs", that
we'll only be OK if have them, and without them we are doomed,nothing.
What crap.  Isn't it time we flushed?

BBC, beautiful, sexy,
cuddly, unwaxed, not
blonde, not thin, and
without designer clothes,
tanning salons, designer
hair care products (unless
Head and Shoulders counts :-),
Soloflex, etc.
From: mattm@Apple.COM (Matthew Melmon)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Faggots
Date: 2 Oct 92 16:39:09 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

AH.PBL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Mark) writes:

>  I've been to La Pastaia once.  The bread was hard, but the waiter
>  wasn't, so I never went back.  The Swedish place - Fanny &
>  Alexander - the service was *terrible* and they weren't even
>  crowded, but our (slow) waiter *was* awfully cute.

>  If you like "Italian" types, then Gambardellas (in Menlo Park) is
>  for *you*!  The food is *just* as tasty.

I do agree, oh do I agree!  But I think you missed the beef cake at
La Pastaia - you should try it on a Friday night.  The service at
Fanny's is slow, I must admit.  But didn't you like the food?  The
duck, I thought, was *wonderful*  And the help!  The help... Oh,
la la.

Melmothra, ACC
From: Minotaur@cup.portal.com (Frank - Swilling)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: ***APOLOGY*** (kindly read me)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 18:36:44 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <66729@cup.portal.com> <1992Sep28.030506.6642@spdcc.com>

The stage is bare, except for two men, stage center.

SWILLING has just finished retching prodigiously after
trying unsuccessfully to digest DONAHUE'S last speech.

SWILLING stands, wipes the last of the awful offal from
his lips and is just beginning to speak when a glint from
offstage catches his eye.  It is SWEET YOUNG THAAANG,
radiant in the most gorgeous evening gown you ever saw
and wearing the most darling tiara.  SWILLING, who
just moments ago was prepared to commit murder, loses
all interest in DONAHUE and wanders offstage, hoping
to maybe cop a feel from SWEET YOUNG THAAANG, and
wondering what wiles he's going to have to use on the
kid to separate him from that sparkling tiara.

DONAHUE turns and faces the audience.  A mad, frightening
smile lights up his features.  HE HAS WON.  His hands
fly to his face, and the DONAHUE mask comes off to reveal...

King Lear?

No, DAN QUAYLE!  The audience gasps.  Of course!  Now it all
makes sense.  The unfounded accusations.  The baseless claims.
The bizarre refusal to bring forth any evidence to back up a
word he has said.  The audience is on its feet, and the applause
threatens to bring down the house.  DONAHUE/QUAYLE bows deeply,
triumphantly, and

THE CURTAIN FALLS.

Right on top of his head, unfortunately, crushing him like a
bug.

The End.  (No, really!)

Frank
Minotaur@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com (Jake Coughlin)
Subject: Re: Surnames (was: TERMS OF ENDEARMENT)
Originator: jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 13:54:02 GMT
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research

mara@panix.com (Mara Chibnik):
> It's spelled "Parkinoots."
> It's pronounced "Poots."

well, it's certainly *not* "puss in boots."
-- 
Queer Without A Cause!
Jason Coughlin ( jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com )
"I find myself suddenly in the world, and I recognize that I have one
right alone: that of demanding human behavior of the other." -- Fanon
From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Toys 'r' Us
Keywords: Whee!
Date: 1 Oct 92 17:39:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: spdcc.1992Oct1.173933.7795
Organization: insert anything here

thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance) writes:
>Do you have a favorite sex toy? Have you ever given a sex toy a nickname?

	Waldeaux.





	OK now that you've dragged yourself off of the *floor*, let
me explain.  It was with someone I was with, it only happened once,
and at the time it was *verY* effective..... :-)


	But then again what would you expect from someone who
has a conceptual dick or proportions that only be expressed
in the mathematical form a + b*i ?  (And while "a" ishall we
say, conservative, let me tell you that that is no reflection on 
the endowment of "b"!)


BBC
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: Ah, Fashion.
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst MA
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 19:19:14 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.212321.4290@spdcc.com> dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) writes:

>In article <BvIEyr.IHo@unix.amherst.edu> twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
>
>>No; however, what looks "good" will stink like rotten liver next week.
>>That the standards of "looking good" are so ephemeral suggests that
>>people's adherence to them *are* a result of insecurity.
>
>Can we PLEASE ground this in some sort of reality?  This whole
>conversation sounds to me like you're discussing the style of the
>Emperor's New Clothes.

Agreed.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "You are just naive and repressed because
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /  penis envy is here and it's now and it's
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  all around you." -- Neal C. Wickham
From: uctlxpd@ucl.ac.uk (Peter Bartlett)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Canadian motss?
Date: 1 Oct 92 23:26:53 GMT
Organization: Bloomsbury Computing Consortium

Does anyone know of a Canadian version of soc.motss that is available
to those of us not actually in Canada?  I am aware of a UK version which
is organized as a private mailing list, but would like to tie into a
Canadian one too, to get all the news from home.

peter bartlett
from Manotick, Ontario, but living in London, England.
From: coren@osf.org (Robert Coren)
Subject: Re: usenet.age
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 15:15:19 GMT

In article <1992Sep26.013729.18504@reed.edu>, nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:
> I think our response to the term "old" is quite different, then. You
> seem to be concerned that calling someone "old" is denigrating. On the
> other hand, I like "old", although I usually use nicer words like
> "mature", "older", "intersting", or just plain "sexy."

Gotta love this guy.
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance)
Subject: Re: Toys 'r' Us
Keywords: Whee!
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 23:57:27 GMT

schiles@valentine.us.oracle.com (Suzanne Chiles) writes:

>deep red.  I also went home with my very container of Astroglide, which
>I still use for just about everything.  Live and learn!

It's a floorwax! It's a dessert topping! It's a floorwax! It's a dessert
topping!

>Suzanne 
>(who hasn't found anything to blush over in quite a while)

I know! I just bought my first sex toys a week or so ago (nothing big,
just a cockring and a buttplug. Practice, practice, practice!!!), and I
realized after I left the place that I wasn't embarassed to make my
purchases at all. I even ran into an ex at the counter and didn't blink.
--
John Dorrance * Alleged Homosexual/Shameless Hussy * thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu

			Dark. Handsome. 6 feet tall.
		  31 flavors? I believe he's got 'em all!
From: shore@dinah.tc.cornell.edu (Melinda Shore)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Ah, Fashion.
Date: 2 Oct 92 12:55:58 GMT
Organization: Cornell Theory Center

In article <67031@cup.portal.com> Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison) writes:
>As I've said for some time: in my opinion, fashion is a vast 
>waste of time and money.  

A very odd comment coming from someone who goes on and on
and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and
on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on
and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and
on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on
and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and
on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on
and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and
on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on
and on and on about other people's tastes and body hair.
If you really didn't care about fashion you wouldn't give a
damn about what other people do with their bodies.

Sheesh.
--
       Melinda Shore - Cornell Theory Center - shore@tc.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: gay science fiction
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst MA
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 19:26:45 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.134031.245073@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> dh0a@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (DONALD L. HARDY) writes:

>Just rememebered.  "Friday" by Robert Heinlein (Stranger in a Strange Land) has
>a cheerfully bisexual woman as the title character.

Unfortunately, Heinlein's portrayals of sexuality (mainly female
sexuality) were rather overwhelmingly sexist and patronizing.  I
cannot recall any female Heinlein character imbued with sexuality that
seemed any more two-dimensional than those in alt.sex.stories.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "You are just naive and repressed because
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /  penis envy is here and it's now and it's
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  all around you." -- Neal C. Wickham
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: Ah, Fashion.
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 92 10:35:06 GMT


In article <BvIoGA.Du8@unix.amherst.edu>
twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

>In article <1992Oct2.212416.15594@macc.wisc.edu>
>anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:

>T, who refuses to ever apologize for grammor mistakes

Nobody's perfect.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: pc@linus.mitre.org (Penny Chase)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Hospital Study Suggests Gays Are Very Unlikely To Be Molesters
Date: 3 Oct 92 00:55:04 GMT
	<1992Oct2.204822.8970@schaefer.math.wisc.edu>
Organization: Research Computer Facility, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford MA

In article <1992Oct2.204822.8970@schaefer.math.wisc.edu>
nedervol@schaefer.math.wisc.edu (Eric Nedervold) writes:

   The book _Sexual_Landscapes_ (I forget the author) looks at different
   kinds of human sexuality.  The author reported a study that seemed 
   to indicate that the young preadolescent male body is more of a turn-on
   to straight men than to gay men.  They used a device to measure penile
   erection and got these results much to their own surprise, if I 
   remember it correctly.

I'm not familiar with the book, but years I ago heard Jim Weinrich
describe this, or a similar, study (it was carried out by some very
famous sex researcher, whose name escapes me [hey, I said it was years
ago]).  I believe that they used pictures of prepubescent boys,
prepubescent girls, and landscapes as a control.  The heterosexual men
responded most to the prepubscent girls, and then to the prepubescent
girls.  The homosexual men responded most to the landscapes (no wonder
our arnold loves to garden).  Weinrich suggested that this might
explain why society is so afraid of child molestation by homosexuals:
since heterosexual men felt some arousal at seeing the pictures of
prepubescent boys, they would assume it would more arousing for
homosexual men (and historically, heterosexual men have been
responsible for most of our laws).

	Penny


--
UUCP:  { ... }!linus!pc 
INTERNET:  pc@mitre.org
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: bobsarv@microsoft.com (Bob Sarver)
Subject: Re: To Bob Sarver
Date: 03 Oct 92 00:14:56 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.



/(rjwill)
/I admire your missionary zeal, but fear it's wasted here.
/Cr*m*r's an attention-fetishist, so you're getting him off,
/and R*nz*n*'s a failed AI project they forgot to unplug.

You are probably correct.  I will direct the discussion to a more 
appropriate newsgroup.
From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: My Very Own Out List
Date: 29 Sep 92 16:10:04 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <1992Sep29.160109.23977@tc.cornell.edu>
shore@dinah.tc.cornell.edu (Melinda Shore) writes:

>In article <97044@bu.edu> kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star) writes:

>>she [Paglia] generalizes about the lesbian sensibility
>>too much.

>"The" lesbian sensibility?  Is that cousin to "the" gay
>lifestyle, or perhaps to "the" gay community?

I said it was a generalization, didn't I?
From: berninge@cs.purdue.EDU (James Berninger)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Damon Wayons -- what's the deal?
Date: 30 Sep 92 17:18:24 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University

In article <1992Sep29.184757.15008@morrow.stanford.edu>,
AH.PBL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Mark) writes:
>In article <19762@ector.cs.purdue.edu>,
>berninge@cs.purdue.EDU (James Berninger) writes:
>>Personally, I found the "Men On..." skits rather humorous.  Let's
>>face it, they were campy.  And judging from a good number of the
>>articles in this group, quite a few of us like camp.
>  But not by homophobic straight men like Wayans (sp?)...
Personally, I didn't really know for sure that they were homophobic
until this past weekend.  And, their routines were based almost
entirely on stereotypes -- stereotypes which I notice have been more
than present in this group.  For that matter, are jokes about Dan
Quayle any more or less funny when told by a Democrat or
Republican?

>>I have no question that GLAAD or NGLTF should be notified/take
>>action against the show(s).  Much of Mr. Donahue's article supports
>>this point, and I doubt anyone in this group with half a brain would
>>disagree.
>  Why should they "take action against the show" if you think it's
>  "humorous", as you said in the first paragraph?  (What was that
>  about half a brain?)
Apparently the half you misplaced.  The show I was referring to (in
the singular sense) was the special or whatever I saw over the
weekend -- much more plainly attacking than a humorous attempt.

Jim Berninger                   ______ "This is no 'Whoops!'  This is
berninge@cs.purdue.edu          \    /  an 'Aaaaaaaauuuuuggggghhhh!'"
B0.2 f(~) w- c- g k? s- e r- p   \  /   - Harvey ("Arnold") Fierstein
Green Lantern Fan, Extraordinaire \/      "Torch Song Trilogy"
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: stephena@netcom.com (Stephen Arrants)
Subject: Re: enough already.
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 22:53:39 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.220147.27664@netcom.com> jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton) writes:
>In article <1992Oct1.201247.20643@netcom.com> stephena@netcom.com (Stephen 
>Arrants) writes:
>>
>>Um....would this have anything to do with the "'Harder Sir!'/'Take it, Boy!'" 
>>discussion of a few months back?  
>
>Amazing how these things get sanitized, isn't it?
>
>Those lines were "Shove it deeper, master" and "Take it, you bitch". 
>
Oh, sorry......I must've been reading BEAR magazine again.  They write smaller
sentences you know. 



Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: glp@fig.citib.com (Greg Parkinson)
Subject: Re: Sex Pumps (was Re: demuffining)
Originator: glp@merlin
Organization: Citibank IBISM
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 15:31:43 GMT


In article <66973@cup.portal.com>, Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison) writes:
|> Greg Parkinson asks:
|> >R`nR gave me one of these vacuum things but it doesn't
|> >seem to seal at the base.  Is it true I would have to
|> >shave down there to get it work?  *Somebody* here must
|> >know......  I
|> 
|> Forget the razor.  You just have to use enough of the right
|> kind of lubricant to form a seal.  This does get a bit messy,
|> I concede.

"right kind of lubricant"?  Would that be something like
LARD I mean Crisco-type stuff or motor oil or Yak Fat or
what?

-- 
Greg Parkinson                  Phone: 212-657-7814  Fax: 212-825-8607
Citibank,111 Wall Street        E-Mail: glp@fig.citib.com
New York, New York  10043
The opinions expressed are my own and not those of the big 'ol bank.
Newsgroups: soc.motss,soc.bi