HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Help me with these annoying things about OS/2!
From: jemenake@zeus.calpoly.edu (Joe Emenaker)
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 01:45:55 GMT
Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Okay, there are a few things that I just can't seem to get OS/2 to do or
stop doing and I was hoping some folks could help me with them:

1 - I can't seem to figure out how to tell OS/2 to open a window maximized.
When I open my DOS windows, part of the batch file it runs puts it in
50-line mode. Yet, OS/2 just initially makes the window 25-lines high and
then hits me with a scroll-bar when I got to 50-lines in the DOS session.
I'd like to be able to start it up with a 50-line-sized window.

2 - (This is probably almost the same problem as #1). OS/2 doesn't seem to
'dynamically' maximize the window. If I maximize a 50-line DOS window and
then go to 25-lines, the window will shrink. However, if I switch back to
50-lines again, the window won't grow back. Hmph! Annoying.

3 - Whenever I maximize a DOS window, OS/2 shoots it up into the upper left
hand corner.

Now, since I have several programs that I run in 50-line mode, my DOS boxes
switch in and out of 50-line mode often. And these three annoyances keep me
constantly clicking on the maximize button and going up to the upper-left
corner to retrieve the window after OS/2 does me the dubious favor of
moving it for me.

Does anyone know how to get around any of these?
-- 
Joe Emenaker - Sexual Engineer | It's not a fear of FLYING that I suffer from.
   jemenake@nike.calpoly.edu   | It's a fear of landing is such a way as to 
CalPoly, San Luis Obispo, Ca.  | exceed the performance specifications for the 
 (This is the .sig of the day) | airplane!  - Me
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: das9674@usl.edu (Stephenson Daniel A)
Subject: Re: Hands up! Who has deleted WinOS2?
Organization: University of Southwestern Louisiana
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 02:00:56 GMT

Good grief.  I, for one, am waiting for Ami Pro for
OS/2 2.0 to ship.  What to do until then?  I am looking for
a popular, full featured WP with a good propects of upgrades.
Does the Enhanced Editor offer this? I am not so sure about DeScribe...
does anyone have it and wanna talk about it?

--
*Dan Stephenson   das9674@usl.edu 
*"It reminds me of something Cally said. 'He who trusts cannot be
*betrayed, only mistaken.' It was a saying of her people.... Cally is
*dead. So are most of her people." -Avon, from _Rescue_ (Blakes 7)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: How to make MouseSystem Bus mouse work in WIN/OS2?
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 01:40:18 GMT

In article <oyang.714351988@bruce.cs.monash.edu.au> oyang@cs.monash.edu.au (Kai Shing O'Yang) writes:
>	I've got a problem with my (Mouse system) mouse. While I can install
>it under WPS, (using the Logitech Serial mouse option), the pointer is simply
>missing in WIN/OS2 and I couldn't find a way in WIN/OS2 to install the mouse.
>Do I have to dig up my Win3.0 and copy the mouse driver into WIN/OS2? or
>are there ways to work around that?

In addition to the other advice you've received, try switching the
VIDEO_SWITCH_NOTIFICATION setting to whatever it isn't.  That setting
is in the DOS settings for your Win-OS/2 full screen desktop.

-- 
Get the OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST | Timothy F. Sipples
from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp,     | Internet: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu
directory pub/os2/all/faq, or from      | Dept. of Econ., U. Chicago, 60637
LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP"). | After these 4 years, Bush?  Not.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Adding a new modem
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 01:33:04 GMT

In article <1992Aug21.194004.17564@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> mlevis@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Mike Levis) writes:
>Actually, the FAQL is in the /pub/os2/all/faq directory.  The current
>FAQL is called faq20d.txt .
>The FAQL is a must-read for every OS/2 user (or potential user).
>Gee, I sure hope the Great TFS will expand the FAQL into a book. ;)
>P.S.  FAQL 1.x > FAQL 2.0 > upcoming book.  Yay.

Is that a hint?

Actually, now that you mention it, I should report on the progress of
the book.

It is going VERY slowly -- far more slowly than I had thought.  I've
simply been far too busy to put much (enough) effort into it.  I'll
continue to keep at it, but it may not be finished until OS/2 3.0 at
this rate.  :-)

So let me state it this way: don't ask about the book.  But should
something arrive in your mailbox for you to read, you should be
genuinely surprised.  :-)

-- 
Get the OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST | Timothy F. Sipples
from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp,     | Internet: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu
directory pub/os2/all/faq, or from      | Dept. of Econ., U. Chicago, 60637
LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP"). | After these 4 years, Bush?  Not.
From: bking@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Barry King)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: COM cards with IRQ > 7 for ISA ?
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 92 09:15:22 MDT
Organization: Edmonton Remote Systems #1, Edmonton, AB, Canada


- Is there such a thing ?  I'm not talking about the multi $100, 4-or-8 port
- proprietary jobs that require special drivers, and are usually used for
- multi-user systems.  I mean a regular rinkeydink COM card with a '16-bit'
- card edge that allows jumpering the IRQ up into the 9-15 region...
- 
- A related thing I'm curious about...  does the 16550 UART  have a buffer
- only on the receive side, or is there one on the Tx side as well ?
- It seems almost too obvious to ask, but that would be a way to get around
- the 1k interrupt/second limitation...
- 
- Perhaps, before long, there will be a 'C' release of that chip?
- 
- -- k(sup)2

I went hunting for the same thing.  In the Computer Shopper I found a few 
places claiming to have such boards.  I called a couple of them.  USA 
Electronics Inc. in Dallas, Tx has, so they say, 16 bit boards with 
selectable interrupts.  Their tech voice line is (214) 631-7800.  They 
told me I wanted a SIO264 (with 16550AFN UARTs) at $179.00 USD.  They 
have non-16550 versions as well.  There were a few other places too.  
This was the only source (The Computer Shopper) that had listings for 
such cards.
 
I'd be interested in what you find out and if you buy one how well it 
works.
 
Regards

Barry King              bking@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca
Edmonton Remote Systems:  Celebrating 10 years of service to Northern Alberta
From: mstaben@comtch.spk.wa.us (Matthew Staben)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Please send..
Date: 12 Aug 92 19:38:33 GMT
Organization: Waffle BBS at CompuTech Spokane, Washington


 
I am in dire need for OS2.H from any source.  Please mail me a copy to 
mstaben@comtch.spk.wa.us.  The source would preferably be from the IBM C 
compiler - but the GCC version should be adequate.
 

mstaben@comtch.spk.wa.us
 
- A warning to anyone, still in command...
From: clomera@skat.usc.edu (arnold clomera)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Printing with an ASP Maestro
Date: 19 Aug 1992 07:21:39 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Distribution: comp
Reply-To: clomera@usc.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: skat.usc.edu

I have several machines connected to an ASP Maestro MS-600 (256K).  From
DOS, the machines are able to print.  Direct connections work as well.
However, printing from OS/2 produces nothing.  The system has a 25 pin COM
port which is connected to an RJ11 (4 pin) adapter that plugs into the
MS-600.  On the OS/2 desktop, LPT1: is rerouted to COM1:.  Any suggestions?
The ASP people are clueless about OS/2 and keep suggesting "try this and
call back if it doesn't work," which is starting to get frustrating since
their suggestions don't work.  I'm going to physically check the hardware
today (COM port, cables, etc).

thanks,

arnold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	University Computing Services UNIX/VMS Ex-Consultant Supervisor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold B. Clomera	            ARPA  : clomera@usc.edu
Midas Consulting Services/Owner	    UUCP  : ...!uunet!usc!clomera
People * Computers * Business   COMPUSERVE: 71051,1525
  Tel:  (213) 254-7702       	    USMail: 4155 York Boulevard        
in CA:  (800) 773-4636 [INFO]               Los Angeles, CA  90065-4639
From: gjocc@brt.deakin.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Trident SVGA drivers
Date: 15 Aug 92 14:59:31 GMT
Organization: C&CS, Deakin University

A few quick questions about OS/2 SVGA support....

I have installed the Trident 800 * 600 256 colour drivers.
This works OK for WPS but I have a few problems with WINOS2.

The VGA.DRV is now the Trident 800 * 600 256 colour windows driver but
WINJPEG and WINGIF act as if it is only a 16 colour driver.
Also quiting from the WINOS2 full screen session causes the display to blank
and never come back! I have to switch back to the desktop and close the
WINOS2 session to get out of Windows with out hanging the system.

Any ideas?

My system is a 386/40 with 4MB RAM, 80MB IDE, FAT file system
AMI BIOS, FOREX chipset, video card is JAX-8218 (Trident 8900C)

Another video related question, why can't you run 320 * 200 * 256c
programs in a DOS window with the 800 * 600 * 256c driver?
The REAME with the Trident drivers says 256 -> 16 colour conversion
is too expensive, but what is the problem with 256 colour modes?
It must be more work to convert 256 -> 16 colour so they run under the
standard VGA driver?!?!


Greg O'Sullivan
(gjocc@brt.deakin.edu.au)
From: rassilon@infopls.chi.il.us (Michael Quintero)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: IBM E-MAIL ADDRESSES     
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 92 21:41:58 CDT
X-Maildoor: WaflineMail 1.00r

Does anyone out there know the IBM email addresses to report
bugs and stuff like that?  I'd really appreciate the information.

Mike Quintero ( rassilon@infopls.chi.il.us )
___
 * MR/2 1.04 NR * DisneyLand: A people trap operated by a mouse.
                                                                                                                                              
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: cann't install Dos progrem from drive B
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 21:52:24 GMT

In article <zhao.713840901@unixg.ubc.ca> zhao@unixg.ubc.ca (Jiansheng Zhao) writes:
>This may be faq: I tried install dos program from drive B:(1.44 MB), from
>one DOS window. It always goes back to read A:. What should I do?

Try using the ASSIGN command -- some applications (e.g. the Framework
III I use) require installation from Drive A.  ASSIGN does the trick
-- look it up in your online Command Reference if you don't know how
to use it.

-- 
Get the OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST | Timothy F. Sipples
from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp,     | Internet: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu
directory pub/os2/all/faq, or from      | Dept. of Econ., U. Chicago, 60637
LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP"). | Tsongas > Perot > Clinton.  Yay.
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS2 Driver Development Kit from IBM???
Date: 14 Aug 92 03:45:11 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <+71mn0d.feustel@netcom.com> feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel) writes:
>On an unrelated note, does anyone know when 32-bit c++ compilers will
>become available for os/2?

Microway has one today -- $295 introductory pricing, I believe.  They
advertise in Byte all the time.

There are also the GCC/2 and EMX/GCC ports (freeware), of course.
-- 
Get the OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST | Timothy F. Sipples
from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp,     | Internet: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu
directory pub/os2/all/faq, or from      | Dept. of Econ., U. Chicago, 60637
LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP"). | Tsongas > Perot > Clinton.  Yay.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: fearick@physci.uct.ac.za (Roger Fearick)
Subject: Re: Switching OS/2 windows<>fullscreen
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 16:24:14 GMT
Organization: Physics Department, University of Cape Town

In article <19682@plains.NoDak.edu> phaniraj@plains.NoDak.edu (V. Phaniraj) writes:

>Using Microsoft FORTRAN 5.1, all the programs I compile for OS/2
>switch a windowed OS/2 session to a  full-screen one, and then return
>to windowed mode once the application finishes running. I wrote
>a little program that does nothing except shell to %OS2_SHELL,
>and this works as a windowed--> full-screen switching program.
>(requires access to command line though, not triggered by a
>keyboard sequence). It would be interesting to check if this
>session has direct access to the video hardware, which was mentioned
>as one of the differences between windowed and full-screen sessions.
>How would one test this ?

The default behaviour of link.exe that you use for MS fortran 5.1 is to mark 
the exe file as NOTWINDOWCOMPAT. This can be changed to WINDOWCOMPAT, e.g by 
an appropriate statement in the .def file (I don't have the docs handy..)
This means that when you start the program the os/2 loader detects that the 
program can only run in a full screen session (with full access to video 
etc....) and starts up ANOTHER session in which to run it. (you original 
windowed session will probably be iconised). So you're not actually 
switching between windowed and full screen sessions. There's a markexe.exe 
program that came with some of the microsoft stuff that will let you turn 
you Fortran app exe file into one that will run in a windowed session.
For info, the 32 bit link386.exe that comes with os/2 defaults to a windowed 
os/2 session.


>Raj
>-- 

Roger.


Roger Fearick                 *  Internet: fearick@physci.uct.ac.za
Dept. of Physics              *
University of Cape Town       *
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen)
Subject: Re: Davys Dingbats and ATM
Organization: University of Hawaii
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 19:05:30 GMT

John Serrano writes:

> I just ftp'ed DAVYDING.ZIP from WUARCHIVE.WUSTL.EDU (in the /mirrors/win3
> /fonts/atm directory).  It is a symbolic font, similar in spirit to
> Zapf Dingbats.
> 
> The zip file contains the needed files for Windows and OS/2 ATM.  I un-
> zipped the *.afm and *.pfb files into  the os2dll directory, and
> installed it via the font palette.  Good to go?  No!
> 
> When I selected the font in Describe, I get blank spaces when I try
> to type something (if I get that far).  Has anyone tried using it with
> some degree of success?  An inquiring mind would like to know.

There are lots of fonts that for some reason simply don't work under OS/2
properly.  I haven't tried the one you're referring to here, but there are
others, including some among the OS/2 archives at the NMSU FTP site, that
cause very strange behavior.  Some fonts do nothing more than display
blank spaces, just like the one you tried.  Others display properly on the
screen, but when you try to print them, the word processor decides to exit
without being told to do so.  And in the case of CaslonOpenFace, a pretty
font on screen, the mere act of typing an uppercase 'm' will kill the word
processor (this behavior has been observed with both DeScribe 3.0 and
Word 1.1b).

The author of the PFM2AFM converter mentions in the documentation that the
.AFM file stores more information than the .PFM file, so the converter can't
properly create all of the information that the .AFM can contain.  I can
only guess that this missing information is somehow to blame for the weird
performance of some fonts.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: govax@wam.umd.edu (Seigneur Tenebreux)
Subject: Is anyone using OS/2 with a 486sx 20/25?
Keywords: 486 486sx os2
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 21:43:51 GMT

I am currently constructing a computer system for personal usage, and being
a poor college type (almost redundant, repetitiive, I realise :) I am
leaning towards getting a 486sx motherboard due to low cost in lieu of just
a fast 386.  I am interested in doing computational linguistics work at
a graduate level in a couple years, but don't forsee a pressing need for
the FPU at the moment (I can always get an overdrive proc. when the prices
drop if I want to upgrade that system in the future, but by then, a more 
advanced computer may be another consideration)  I am highly interested in
OS/2 2.0 and have followed its rn groups quite often.

My question is as the subject line says.. has anyone had experience working
with OS/2 on a 486sx 20 or 25?  What have your experiences been like?
How is performance with a relatively fast hd and hpfs?

Any input you can give would be greatly appreciated

cheers

andy

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry)
Subject: Re: DOS and HPFS
Originator: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 06:59:52 GMT

pv9955@albnyvms.bitnet wrote:
> If I format my hard drive as one large partition, and use HPFS, does that
> mean that I cannot use a DOS prompt anymore, since DOS will only recognize
> FAT?  How about DOS in a Window?
> Or is the OS2 prompt *completely* DOS compatible?

Running a DOS window from OS/2 will give you access to your HPFS
partition with no problems. Usually almost everything you would want to
do in a DOS window you can do in an OS/2 window anyway.

The only time you can't access the HPFS drive is if you boot DOS from a
floppy (or another HDD) or if you boot a specific DOS version into a VDM
through a DOS image.

-- 
Tom J Parry.
Your reality is a figment of my imagination.
From: robertson@physc1.byu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Out of Memory
Date: 13 Aug 92 15:58:41 GMT
Organization: Brigham Young University


  For the first time since I got OS/2 I got an out of memory error
  that suggested I close an app and then press OK.  Both times this has
  happened, I have closed all of my apps without getting rid of this
  obnoxious little thing.  I had just installed the new kernal before
  this happened, so I suspected that might be the problem, so I
  reinstalled the 31/03/92 kernel.  So far no problems.  Am I correct
  in assuming the new kernel is the problem?  Has this happened to
  others?  Do I need to report it to IBM, if so how?

  Thanks,     Jim Robertson     robertson@physc1.byu.edu
From: zoodp@zoom.zoo.latrobe.edu.au (David Pizzey)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: CDROM & Soundblaster Pro
Date: 14 Aug 92 10:08:15 GMT
Organization: Zoology Dept., La Trobe University, Australia.


Hope this isn't a FAQ!

Does anyone know if the Creative Labs SoundBlaster Pro card and 
respective CD-ROM drive are supported by OS2 2.0?? If so
how do you set it up?

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks - David.

(please e-mail a copy of any replies).

zoodp@zoo.latrobe.edu.au
David Pizzey - Zoology Dept, La Trobe University
	       Bundoora, Australia 3083.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: quan@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Tony Quan)
Subject: IBM to start advertising OS/2 on TV
Originator: quan@Xenon.Stanford.EDU
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 01:30:33 GMT



IBM will start advertising OS/2 on TV.  Ads will run starting Wednesday
on programs such as the U.S. Tennis Open, Good Morning America, and 20/20,
and on cable channels like CNN, ESPN, and A&E.

--Tony
quan@cs.stanford.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: cvadrtbc@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu (Srikanth Viswanathan)
Subject: Re: Central Point Backup (for Windows) under OS/2
Organization: California Polytechnic University, Pomona
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 02:10:00 GMT
X-Posted-From: vmsb.is.csupomona.edu
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <4479@news.duke.edu>, eaj@acpub.duke.edu (Edward A. Johnson) writes...
> 
>Their software does not support QIC 40/80 tape drives (i.e., Colorado or
>Maynard ArchiveXL tape drives). Nor does any other software that I have
>tried to locate. This fiasco is very reminiscent of the esentially zero
>printer support that came with OS/2 1.0. This together with no OS/2
>Stacker is infuriating. My OS/2 2.0 still lies on the shelf and I continue 
>with Windows 3.1 and Norton Desktop 2.0, which BTW, do a surprisingly good
>job. Windows 3.1 support for graphics DOS windows has solved many of my
>problems that drove me to consider OS/2 2.0. Maybe, someday, I'll get to
>try OS/2. 8=))!

Don't blame IBM and OS/2 for the lack of software for your tape drive. 
Call up the vendor and complain.  It's not IBM's problem!  Look at
Colorado,  first they said that they weren't even considering OS?2
software, then when people starting complaining, they said sometime
in early 1993, and now they have said 4th quarter of this year.  I'm
GLAD that I put of buying a tape drive a couple of months ago.  I would
have probably ended up being screwed over by Colorado like many others!
Whatever hardware/software I buy now, I make sure that it will work/run
with OS/2.  If not, I make sure I tell the vendor WHY I don't buy it!

Srikanth
From: gt0297a@prism.gatech.EDU (Tim Drury)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: tcp/ip for os2
Date: 13 Aug 92 13:13:12 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In <1992Aug12.101517.15552@newstand.syr.edu> mprisco@lynx.cat.syr.edu writes:

>I have a PS/2 model 80 running OS/2 2.0.  I've installed TCP/IP
>for OS/2 1.2.  I have a token ring card that I use with CM to

this stuff is usually discussed in comp.os.os2.networking.  i'm not
sure about the token ring card in particular but i know that os/2 2.0
and tcp/ip 1.2 are not completely compatable.  a few folks have gotten
it to work.  what you need is tcp/ip 1.2.1 which has a much better
installation procedure (no manual editing of setup files).  if
you want to know how to get 1.2.1 using your 1.2 proof of license then
email me.

>get to our mainframe and an ethernet card that I want to use (with tcp/ip) to
>get to our RISC 6000.  I seem to be having problems with either
>(or both) config.sys and protocol.ini.  I think the latter is the
>main problem.  I keep getting a syntax error on protocol.ini at 
>start up and then a message saying the driver (ethlnkmc) in config.sys
>wasn't loaded....  Any ideas????
>Thanks
>Margot (mprisco@cat.syr.edu)

-tim drury
tdrury@calsun.gatech.edu
From: dtl8v@csissun12.ee.Virginia.EDU (Douglass Thornton Lamb)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Win NT support in OS/2
Date: 12 Aug 92 17:12:06 GMT
Article-I.D.: murdoch.1992Aug12.171206.305
Organization: University of Virginia
Originator: dtl8v@csissun12.ee.Virginia.EDU



  I've read that Microsoft and IBM will not be renewing their
code cross-licensing agreement when it expires next year, but
IBM will continue ad perpetuum to have rights to the code for
Windows 3.0, 3.1, and NT, because they are covered by the
current licensing agreement.  So can we expect Windows NT
support in OS/2 3.0, when it becomes available next year?
Obviously, it will require a 486 instead of a 386 and will
probably have a major upgrade price tag attached to it,
but you have to look ahead, right?  Microsoft has already
begun work on the Windows 4.0 software to replace Windows NT.
The pace of change in this market is astounding!
  (All this is, of course, moot if I don't get my Win 3.1
  support on the September CSD...)

Doug Lamb
University of Virginia
dtl8v@Virginia.EDU