HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: roan@convex.com (Russell Roan)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush burns Hillary, and other things...
Date: 30 Sep 92 17:58:31 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In article <1992Sep30.160022.1298@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu (Steve Chaney : Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.0) writes:

>Hillary Clinton did an interview with affiliate WWWE in
>Cleveland, and when she was asked about Rush Limbaugh's comments
>on her husband's lack of a college degree she laughed and replied
>"you know, Rush Limbaugh has this great racket going where he
>says whatever he wants to say regardless of the facts, because
>it, you know, it makes news and it's controversial. I mean that's
>how he makes his living." Hillary then laughs again.

  [ Excerpt from campaign biography deleted in which Clinton
	muses over not completing his Rhodes scholarship degree].
     
>Okay, folks, someone please show me where Hillary was right on this issue?
>Rush Limbaugh was directly challenged over Gov. Bill Clinton's education,
>and he read it right out of the biography.
>

	Uhh, I don't really expect any of you dittoheads to know this,
	so I'll just let you know that one must first complete an 
	undergraduate degree before being awarded a Rhodes scholarship.  
	Thus Bill Clinton must have completed a college degree before
	even applying for the Rhodes.

	This is typical of the kind of distortion served up by Rush and 
	his string-pullers the Bush campaign.

	Of course, the way our education president has been campaigning
	against studying abroad, one would think that he would be 
	opposed to scholarship of this sort.  Maybe Rush hasn't received
	his official orders from Bush of how to portray scholars.
	(i.e, He should be commending Clinton for not finishing 
	 his studies because they were only "furrin ideas.")

> [Lame attempt to emulate rush-style "humor" deleted.]
-- 
Russell Roan	  |"Lord, teach us to respect our political opponents....
roan@convex.com   | In the hard campaign ahead, help us to never boast,
Vox: 214-497-4841 | nor to be uncharitable."  - Dan Quayle at prayer.
From: gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: rights and responsibilities
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 18:50:00 GMT

<BvCwHB.3L7@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> varney@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Bruce Varney) said:
>In <1992Sep28.173810.11007@pwcs.stpaul.gov> chrisl@stpaul.gov (Chris A Lyman) writes:
>>>> Do please tell us Bruce, how inconvenient you found it to be when you
>>>> were pregnant.
>>> Today's word of the day is "Straw man".  Can everybody here say, "Straw
>>> man"?  Claiming that a person should not oppose murder because of their
>>> gender is silly.  If someone considers abortion murder, then they are
>>> morally bound to oppose it.
>>Lots of pro-lifers have spouted "Abortion is Murrderr!!!" but I've never
>>seen any of them come to grips with the implications of their rhetoric.
>
>	Well then why don't you tell us what the implications are?

In some states: the death penalty.  Do you support the death penalty for
women who procure an abortion?  Even if they have say 5 children already?

>>> I prefer his moral stand to your sniping, empty attacks.
>
>>So you prefer to be judgemental and condemning with no other facts before
>>you than "a woman has had an abortion?"  That's your idea of a moral stand?
>
>	Let's try, "a woman has had an abortion for reasons other
>than physical danger to her life". What other facts do you need? I think
>that if I was given "person X murdered person Y for reasons other than
>danger to his/her life", it would be pretty clear cut. 

If that were the case you would be reading the results of a conviction.
If you were reading the description of a case to be tried it would read
that "person X *killed* person Y..." since _murder_ would have to be
proven in a court of law.

>>Perhaps you'd like to take a seat with the Pharisees[1] over there?
>
>>[1] one the meanings of 'pharisee' in my dictionary is: "a person marked by
>>hypocritical, censorious self-righteousness.
>
>	Please show me the hypocrisy in my position.

You claim to be pro-life yet seem to support laws and ideaologies that
could result in women facing the death penalty.


Gordon
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6209 alt.politics.elections:14916 talk.abortion:39998 alt.sex:31656 alt.politics.clinton:8144 alt.politics.bush:7481 talk.politics.misc:49080
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.elections,talk.abortion,alt.sex,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: rights and responsibilities
From: adams@spss.com (Steve Adams)
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 13:54:58 GMT
 <1992Sep30.195132.6469@pwcs.stpaul.gov> <1ad9meINNbkq@bigboote.WPI.EDU>
Organization: SPSS Inc.

jseaver@arkose.WPI.EDU (Jason John Seaver) writes:

>	Very, VERY few people would complain about abortion when the mother's
>life is in danger.  However, if the woman is pregnent through voluntary sex...
>Well, you could say she's committed herself.

Not at all.  Assume that she is using effective birth control, and using it
properly.  She still gets pregnant.  Where did she agree to pregnancy?

 -Steve
--
  The opinions expressed above are those of the author and not SPSS, Inc.
                         -------------------
   adams@spss.com                                  Phone: (312) 329-3522
   Steve Adams        "Space-age cybernomad"       Fax:   (312) 329-3558
From: andrewa@harlqn.co.uk (Andrew Armstrong)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: Mostly Harmless book signing
Date: 28 Sep 92 16:59:19 GMT
Distribution: alt
Organization: Harlequin Limited, Cambridge, England

Douglas Adams will be signing Mostly Harmless, "the fifth book in the
increasingly inaccurately named HitchHikers trilogy", from 12:30 to
1:30 on October 9th, in Heffer's, Cambridge, England. That will teach
you all not to live in Cambridge (if you don't)...
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: Adam Lawrence Salter <adam@zooid.guild.org>
Subject: Re: Don't Panic GIF
Organization: The Zoo of Ids
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 16:17:45 GMT

In article <lzfz=a#@rpi.edu>, danaf@bray1a.its.rpi.edu (Frank R. Dana Jr.) writes:
>In article <Bv45GA.HG1@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu>, djesimps@cantor.math.uwaterloo.ca (Darel J. Simpson) writes:
>
>|> (and no more 42 debates!!!)
>
>Speaking of the 42 debate...
>
>There's a million explanations for the 42 thing. I've never met DNA, so I have
>no idea if he's the sort of person to do this, but one explanation I've heard 
>revolves around the meanings of "a 69" and "a 42". Decorum prevents me from
>telling more, but let's just say that followups should be posted to alt.sex.
>
>9)
>
>|> 	--Darel J. Simpson
>
>-- 
>/////////////////////////[[[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>(718)             (212)                        (516)             (518)
>=======Amiuser============Frank R. Dana, Jr.============Doc Ami=======     
>--------My opinions rarely reflect those of any sane person,----------
>	   living, dead, or undead... that's gonna CHANGE.


  My brother met him and I doubt he'd do this although he did have some
Interesting jokes in his later books...

                                                            adam
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: leifmk@Lise.Unit.NO (Leif Magnar Kj|nn|y)
Subject: Re: New Hitchhiker's Book
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 92 18:58:40 GMT

In article <1an63lINNak2@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, jcb7@po.CWRU.Edu (Jeremy C. Bargen) writes:
 > 
 > In a previous article, sl14@crux3.cit.cornell.edu (Stephen Lee) says:
 > 
 > >In article <1ag6hcINNrig@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> keeper@deeptht.armory.com writes:
 > >>
 > >>We pretty much noted all the major changes between the UK and U.S. versions
 > >>of the previous Guide books -- now we've another one to compare.
 > >>
 > >Does anybody still have a copy of the comparison?  It'd be interesting
 > >to see what DA changed.
 > >
 > >Please, send me a copy,
 > >
 > >Stephen
 > >
 > Me, too.
 > -- 
 > "You are all individuals! You are all different!"  | Vermin D. Pestilent
 > "Yes! We are all different!"                       | 
 > "I'm not."  "Sssh!"                                | jcb7@po.cwru.edu
 >                                                    |

DON'T send it--POST IT!!

Leif the .sigless

Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: nivin@guadalupe.cs.tcu.edu (Jeff Nivin)
Subject: THHGTTG TV Programs
Organization: I'm SO sure...
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 05:19:20 GMT



Hey froopy ones,

   Is anyone out there who REALLY knows where there towel is able to tell me
where I could obtain copies of the TV series of the HHG?  Also, I am
interested in the radio programs.  I have the first two, but can't find the 
rest.  

  On the TV Programs, please don't tell to watch PBS late night.  I have 
heard that for four years, but have still not seen them.  Feel free to mail
me at my address or respond here.

                                               Thanx,
                                                 Jeffrey Nivin


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ford, you're turning into a penquin.  Stop it." - Arthur Dent

                                               nivin@guadalupe.cs.tcu.edu

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Phil.Hodges@f601.n105.z1.therose.pdx.com (Phil Hodges)
Sender: postmaster@therose.pdx.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: New Hitchhiker's Book
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1992 00:09:16 -0700

"Hrust, talking to All, said about 'New Hitchhiker's Book' ":

> Does anyone know anything about Mostly Harmless?  At a book reading
>more than a year ago, Adams himself dsaid it would be out soon.  Since then I
>have heard rumours that it is about to be released, yet have failed to see
>anything.  What's up?
>    -H Rust

    What IS up?! A new Hitchhiker's book??! Are you serious?!

___
 X SLMR 2.1a X What I am is What I am You what you are or what?
From: ensalada@cats.ucsc.edu (Kevin Charles Rubio)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: Re: Scrabble and Book Signings
Date: 7 Oct 1992 00:32:33 GMT
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
Reply-To: keeper@deeptht.armory.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu


In article <1992Oct6.024550.7934@u.washington.edu> quendor@hardy.u.washington.edu () writes:
>>> 	And secondly, and slightly more importantly - In a very idle moment
>>> during the holidays I happened to have a Scrabble board handy, and tried to 
>>> spell out "What do you get if you multiply six by nine" (mainly to irritate my
>>> parents, because it was one of those magnetic travel thingies. Anyway - you
>>> can't. There aren't enough y's in a Scrabble set. Even if you use the blank 
>>> provided you end up one y short.
>   Not that it matters. Arthur used a homemade set anyway.

Exactly!  Let us remember that The Question was in Arthur's mind
(albeit perhaps an incorrect question, since he was foreign to the
computer programme).  So doesn't it make sense that the letters he
made were just enough for spelling out The Answer (as the caveman
did, then the letters were brushed aside (actually I don't recall
the precise movements mentioned in the books, but this is how the
television version went)) and The Question?

--
Email replies must be sent to keeper@deeptht.armory.com
From: bab@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Brian Alan Baker)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: 42
Date: 1 Oct 1992 22:53:09 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu


Hey Guys!  This must come as news to everybody:

	69 is base 13 is 4gi;a j.dssf. a;lsjkfda

Hey!  Get away from me with that axe.  C'mon I'm just posting
an observation.  What the Hell?  


 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  "Laugh and the world laughs with you.  Shoot someone   |   Brian Baker
  and you really limit your appeal." - Joe Martin        |   bab@wpi.WPI.EDU
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: "martin reid" <martin.reid@canrem.com>
Subject: audio tapes
Reply-To: "martin reid" <martin.reid@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: alt
Date: 27 Sep 92 00:05:55 EST

        Does anyone know where one can acquire audio tapes of the
        Hitchhiker Series?

Martin Reid
---
  DeLuxeb #1422  From Dundas the town that Bell forgot!
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: aproden@ac.dal.ca (Andrew P. Rodenhiser)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: Censorship: Kneebiter
Date: 2 Oct 92 13:07:13 -0300
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada


I have two copies of Life, the Universe, and Everything (one
as part of the Complete Hitchhiker's Guide- 4 books plus the
Zaphod story) and there is blatant censorship in one version.
At the very start, on the second page, an alien accosts Arthur
and calls him an asshole.  In the other version, it's changed
to "kneebiter".  Anybody know why?
..Then time really started to pass....
-- 
KISS/Cooper/Metal/Seattle/MontyPython/DouglasAdams/NASCAR/Oldsmobiles
Andrew P. Rodenhiser, Graduate Student, Colloidal Physical Chemistry
Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada      APRODEN@AC.DAL.CA
Fluorescence Probing Studies of Polymer/Surfactant Interactions
"Now I know why everything turns grey, but it's our own world we paint
And I want the brightest, I want fluorescent, every day and night,
For the rest of my life, Open your eyes, Won't you?"--Faith No More
From: siemerin@cs.utwente.nl (Ben Siemerink)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: Remembering all letters in Scrabble
Keywords: Scrabble, letters, Arthur, what do you get when you multiply six by
Date: 6 Oct 92 14:39:53 GMT
Organization: University of Twente, Dept. of Computer Science

nine?

Hi Folks!


Oke S wrote:

> Ah, but Arthur pulled _ALL_LETTERS_ out of the towel, didn't he? But then, I
> expect it would be too much for most people to be able to remember the exact 
> distribution of letters in a Scrabble set after so much travelling in time and
> space.

Doesn't the board tell how many letters should be in the game? At the bottomleft
when you hold it upside down?  At least the Dutch version does, but I don't
think Arthur would have used that one. BTW: there's only one y in the Dutch
version of the game. Good for 8 points!

Ben.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Siemerink                           University of Twente, The Netherlands
siemerin@cs.utwente.nl                         Department of Computer Science
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com (Dave Jones)
Subject: Re: Don't Panic GIF
Organization: :noitazinagrO
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 14:37:39 GMT

Jeremy C. Bargen (jcb7@po.CWRU.Edu) wrote:
: 
: In a previous article, danaf@bray1a.its.rpi.edu (Frank R. Dana Jr.) says:
: 
: >In article <Bv45GA.HG1@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu>, djesimps@cantor.math.uwaterloo.ca (Darel J. Simpson) writes:
: >
: >|> (and no more 42 debates!!!)
: >
: >Speaking of the 42 debate...
: >
: >There's a million explanations for the 42 thing. I've never met DNA, so I have
: >no idea if he's the sort of person to do this, but one explanation I've heard 
: >revolves around the meanings of "a 69" and "a 42". Decorum prevents me from
: >telling more, but let's just say that followups should be posted to alt.sex.
: >
: >9)
: >
: >|> 	--Darel J. Simpson
: >
: 
: A good friend of mine once decided that 69 was the second most profound
: number in the universe (the most profound being, of course, 42), and the
: third most profound number was 111, the sum if 69 and 42.  This is proved
: by the fact that the sum of the digits of 111 is 3, the average of the
: digits of 42 is 3, and 9-6=3.  Also there are 3 numbers.  Therefore, all
: the numbers share a certain fundamental relation. (I believe 3 was the 4th
: most profound number; he's a very numerically-oriented person.)

Yes! Yes! And "111" is "Nelson", Australia's unlucky number in Test
cricket.  Whenever it appears on the scoreboard during an Aussie inning,
clouds form, 'roos hop backwards, and white robots descend on the field
killing all before them.



--
||)) There is no truth to the rumor that:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))|
||)) Lotus are suing Apple for copying the look and feel of their lawsuits )|
||))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))|
||Dave Jones (dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com) | Eastman Kodak Co. Rochester, NY   |
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: ajmorrison@happy.colorado.edu
Subject: Sixty-Nine and Forty-Two....
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: 27 Sep 92 14:14:04 MDT

In article <lzfz=a#@rpi.edu>, danaf@bray1a.its.rpi.edu (Frank R. Dana Jr.) writes:
> In article <Bv45GA.HG1@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu>, djesimps@cantor.math.uwaterloo.ca (Darel J. Simpson) writes:
> 
> |> (and no more 42 debates!!!)
> 
> Speaking of the 42 debate...
> 
> There's a million explanations for the 42 thing. I've never met DNA, so I have
> no idea if he's the sort of person to do this, but one explanation I've heard 
> revolves around the meanings of "a 69" and "a 42". Decorum prevents me from


Okay, I've heard of "69", but what in the world is a "42"????????

   -=Amy the sexually naive at CU-Colorado Springs....=-

Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: marky@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Mark Anthony Young)
Subject: Re: Censorship: Kneebiter
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 23:25:06 GMT

%r danaf@rpi.edu
>In article <1992Oct2.202410.15061@u.washington.edu>, quendor@hardy.u.washington.edu () writes:
>|> aproden@ac.dal.ca (Andrew P. Rodenhiser) writes:
>|> >I have two copies of Life, the Universe, and Everything (one
>|> >as part of the Complete Hitchhiker's Guide- 4 books plus the
>|> >Zaphod story) and there is blatant censorship in one version.
>|> >At the very start, on the second page, an alien accosts Arthur
>|> >and calls him an asshole.  In the other version, it's changed
>|> >to "kneebiter".  Anybody know why?
>|> 
>|>    As I understand it, the kneebiter version is the American release
>|> whereas the asshole version is the briitish release and as Adams
>|> intended it in the first place. Additionally, the entire essay on the
>|> word "belgium"(excuse my vulgerity) was intirely for the benefit of
>|> amreican publishing companies so they wouldn't have to print the word
>|> "fuck".
>
>I believe the kneebiter thing, but someone PLEASE tell me he's wrong about the
>Belgium thing!!!! It's sooooo funny! The whole point of the comedy is that it's
>a simple, ordinary word to us...
>
The word 'belgium' first appears in Fit the Tenth of the radio scripts, used
by Zaphod in a moment of extreme lack of not panicking.  According to the notes,
this episode was made on 3 Dec '79.

The Rory for the Most Gratuitous Use of the Word 'Fuck' in a Serious
Screenplay (or, as it appears in US version, 'Belgium') appears in _Life,
the universe and everything_, published 1982.

Thus, when the US publisher objected to printing 'Fuck' in a decidedly
unserious novel, Adams changed it to 'Belgium', and added the little blurb
that had already appeared in the radio scripts.

...mark young
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: djesimps@lambert.uwaterloo.ca (Darel J. Simpson)
Subject: Re: Scrabble and Book Signings
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 19:35:07 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.110540.836@aston.ac.uk>, thompsmr@uhura.aston.ac.uk (Mark Thompson) In article <1992Oct5.110540.836@aston.ac.uk>, thompsmr@uhura.aston.ac.uk (Mark Thompson) writes:
> 
> 	And secondly, and slightly more importantly - In a very idle moment
> during the holidays I happened to have a Scrabble board handy, and tried to 
> spell out "What do you get if you multiply six by nine" (mainly to irritate my
> parents, because it was one of those magnetic travel thingies. Anyway - you
> can't. There aren't enough y's in a Scrabble set. Even if you use the blank 
> provided you end up one y short.
> 	Oh for a touch of realism, eh? ;-)
> 
Okay, I thought there were _two_ blank tiles in a Scrabble set.. At least there
are in mine.

	Darel J. Simpson  (Who hasn't played Scrabble in AGES!)


I've been called it all before.
From: br@Germany.EU.net (Bodo Rueskamp)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: Re: UK Address
Date: 29 Sep 1992 14:19:47 GMT
Organization: EUnet-Backbone, Germany
NNTP-Posting-Host: walhalla.germany.eu.net

In article <1992Sep25.164256.6592@ncsu.edu> arschwam@eos.ncsu.edu (ALLISON RENEE SCHWAMBERGER) writes:
>Can someone give me the address in the UK from which I can order a copy
>of "Mostly Harmless".

Me too.

; Bodo

-- 
--
Bodo Rueskamp, DG3YGD, br@Germany.EU.net, "F Y CN RD THS Y MST B SNG NX" ..._._
From: jcb7@po.CWRU.Edu (Jeremy C. Bargen)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: Re: 42
Date: 2 Oct 1992 22:44:38 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: jcb7@po.CWRU.Edu (Jeremy C. Bargen)
NNTP-Posting-Host: thor.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, protonen@daimi.aau.dk (Lars J|dal) says:

>csedlack@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Christopher Sedlack) writes:
>
>>As I pointed out, it is SAID "Forty-two".
>
>No, it is not only said. The caveman with the scrabble game spells
>out FORTY TWO (I guess it is in LtUaE, around chapter 33, but I'm
>not sure).
>
>[stuff deleted to keep this brainless post short]
>
>>Chris Sedlack
>>csedlack@imsa.edu
>>csedlack@uiuc.edu
>
>Lars J|dal
>protonen@daimi.aau.dk
>
>>The sigless wonder
>
Yeah, but Scrabble games don't have numbers so he couldn't have spelled out
'42'... 
-- 
"You are all individuals! You are all different!"  | Vermin D. Pestilent
"Yes! We are all different!"                       | 
"I'm not."  "Sssh!"                                | jcb7@po.cwru.edu
                                                   |
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: bjornts@ii.uib.no (Bjoern Tore Sund)
Subject: Re: 42
Keywords: six times nine
Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Bergen
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 14:11:59 GMT

In article <marc.717794946@vieta.math.uni-sb.de>, marc@vieta.math.uni-sb.de (Marc Conrad) writes:
|> 003316g@ace.acadiau.ca (STEPHEN EDWARD ELLIOTT GREGORY) writes:
|> 
|> >	Did anyone else notice that in BASE 13, six times nine does equal 42?
|> AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa................ *sigh*

This is not a reaction to Marc Conrad`s posting in particular, but to the
"comments" on this 42-posting in general;

Pppppppplease flame SEEG on his mail-address, NOT on alt.fan.douglas-adams. 
It get's boring, you know...... :-)
-- 
      ____    _____
      |   \     |     Bjoern Tore Sund               "All that is gold
___   |___/     |     Department of Informatics      does not glitter,
      |   \     |     University of Bergen, Norway   Not all those who
      |___/     |     bjornts@ii.uib.no              wander are lost..."
From: rik@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Richard Beckett)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 08:36:59 GMT
Subject: Re: 42
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Labs, Bristol, UK