HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Sat, 21 Nov 1992 14:05:26 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Jeff Cunningham <jeffc@AREC.UMD.EDU>
Subject:      Re: lwp and tn3270

>>We are having a nasty problem trying to get tn3270 working with lan work
>>place for dos.  The basic symptom is that tn3270 (i have tried both novell's
>>and brown's) seems to work with less than full screens.  As soon as a full
>>screen of information is sent to the pc, it hangs.  No error messages, no
>>beeps, and requires a power off/on cycle to get back.

>>TIA
>>henry wilusz


     Running under Windows I found using a PIF file with the
     "EXECUTION EXCLUSIVE" and "LOCK PROGRAM MEMORY" options checked
     stopped our problems.

     Jeff Cunningham
     U. of Maryland - AREC Dept.
     Jeffc@AREC.UMD.EDU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 10:57:00 AST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         RWILSON@HUSKY1.STMARYS.CA
Subject:      Re: Metering Software

Has anyone setup software metering for several servers so that 40 copies
of Lotus can be metered out to 300 PCs on a lan with 4 servers?

We are doing this with Saber Meter. This does not work well with Windows
(not put a lot of effort into it yet either). There is also the problem
of a PC locking the meter.dbf file now and then....

any comment?

randy           rwilson@husky1.stmarys.ca
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Encoding: 31 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 09:23:00 -0700
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         RMohn@OSPNOV.VPRC.ASU.EDU
Subject:      Solution to LWP General Protection Error

Thanks to Mike Morris and Brian. This was the problem. Once I got the
device=vtcpip.386 in the system.ini file all worked well. I am sending this
back to the whole list as some others wanted to know what suggestions I got
that fixed the problems.

Thank again.
 ----------
Subject: Re: LWP General Protection Error
Date: Thursday, November 19, 1992 4:32PM

>Subject:      LWP General Protection Error
>I keep getting "Filexprs caused a General Protection Fault in module
>Fileexprs.exe at 0017:06A8". Does anyone know what causes this and how to
>fix it. It happens with both numeric and alpha IP address. I got the same
>error in the Host Presenter until I went to numeric IP address but that
will
>not fix it in File Express. Any hits would be greatly appreciated.

Sounds like you had LWP installed on Windows v3.0, then upgraded Windows
to v3.1.  The Windows v3.1 upgrade procedure, for some reason, deletes
the line in SYSTEM.INI that loads VTCPIP.386, the virtual machine interface
for Novell's TCP/IP Transport.  So, make sure the following line is present
in your SYSTEM.INI file under the [386Enh] section:

        device=vtcpip.386

 -- brian
___________________________________________________________________________
Brian Meek                      Novell, Inc. -- Connectivity Products Group
                                Internet mail:  brian@Novell.COM
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <KASPER@PENNDRLS.UPENN.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Sun, 22 Nov 1992 15:29:42 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         KASPER@PENNDRLS.UPENN.EDU
Subject:      Sending UUENCODE Files to the Group

Whats going on here?  I check my mail and find someone (ftpmail@cs.uow.edu.au)
has sent 2M of stuff to everyone in the group!!!  Speaking for myself, if you
want to send something like this PLEASE DO IT ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS!!!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 10:52:27 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         NCUT000 <NCUT@SLUMUS.BITNET>
Subject:      APSVAP Error #150

Kim,
The APSVAP error is a little vague - a problem with the Queue or with
the job - you probably knew that.  The error 150 I've only seen in
PConsole.   In Pconsle it suggests that a queue is corrupted, either
by disk problems or god knows what.  The solution (I think) is to
recreate the queue.

Good luck, I hope this helps.



Nick Cutry                         voice: (315)379-5971
Network Manager                    Bitnet: NCUT@SLUMUS or CUTRY@STLAWU
Computer Services                  Compu$erve: 76424,144 or 73257,2537
St. Lawrence University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 10:30:37 CST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Network Support <cvanov2@CCMAIL.BAMANET.UA.EDU>
Subject:      CD-Rom on Server, MAC & NFS

FYI:
I was talking to a guy from the people who make SCSI EXPRESS at Comdex last
week. They claim that they now have support for MACs and NFS stations to
see CD-Roms mounted on the server.
From: aswiffin@DUX.DUNDEE.AC.UK (Andrew Swiffin)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: Adaptec EISA controllers
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:35:36 GMT
Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via: uk.ac.dundee.pp; Wed, 18 Nov 1992 16:34:21 +0000
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]


    Hi,
    Many thanks to those who've already replied on this issue.  I have
    quite a large number of messages which I'm compiling into a summary
    which I hope to post out soon.

    Some of the messages concerned the firmware and hardware revision
    numbers of the 1740 cards, particular combinations being sure to
    give problems!
    I have two Adaptec 1742a cards with two PROMS one of which is
    labelled:

    450211-00 A
    BIOS 8800
    (c) 1991
    and the other is:
    450113-00 C
    mcode 23A8
    (c) 1991

    The Intel 82355 chip is marked with  SZ576 below the 82355 number.
    Is there anyone who could tell me if this is a setup which is likely
    to give me problems, do I need a firmware upgrade?  Thanks to
    anyone who can help on this.

    Andy
    -------------------
    Andy Swiffin                        aswiffin@dux.dundee.ac.uk
    Dundee University Computing Service
    Dundee Scotland
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: barr@tramp.Colorado.EDU (BARR DOUG)
Subject: We have an ODI driver and want to be able to telnet
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:12:38 GMT

We have an ODI driver for a card and want to telnet. We have the Clarkson
packet drivers and have a telnet that works with them for our other cards.
I have heard of an interface that sits between ODI and the telnet that 
uses the Clarkson packet drivers. Does this exist. I am looking for a
freeware solution to connect to novell networks and unix machines over
ethernet. Clarkson does not support this card. The mfg provides an ODI 
driver but no telnet support. What can be done?

Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: tbkim@well.sf.ca.us (Terry Kimbrough)
Subject: Re: rprinter and Windows
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 19:49:02 GMT


I have used Windows 3.1 and Rprinter for some time and have had no problems.
I first
load the Rprinter then I capture all printer ports re-routing them to the
appropriate
queue.  I then start windows in enhanced mode.  I have yet to encounter a
problem.
Neither from Windows Apps. or DOS Apps. running inside Windows. BTW I also
have 4 Meg
on board and have loaded most of my resident progs in High Memory.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Organization: Penn State University / University Libraries
X-Envelope-to: novell@suvm.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"rp6dlb@Texaco.COM"
X-VMS-Cc: NOVELL_L
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 14:32:00 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "J.Lance Wilkinson, 814-865-1818" <JLW@PSULIAS.BITNET>
Subject:      Never Mind/Thanks on INPUT for Batch file...

>I have the shareware program GET and will upload. The circumstances that
>DON'T require the entry of the password again is if the attach is executed
>from a login script. This can be either the system login script or the user
>login script.
>

Thanks, Derek, but it won't be necessary.

After all the comments about doing the Attach in the login script, which at the
time I thought were because "nobody understands what I want to do...", I looked
at what one has the ability to do *in* a login script.  This made me realize
that what I wanted to do *could* be implemented in a login script, because I
didn't realize just how many things in a login script could be done
*conditionally*.

I've modified the backup user's login script to have the following lines:

        IF "%2" DOES NOT EQUAL "" THEN ATTACH %2
        IF "%3" DOES NOT EQUAL "" THEN ATTACH %3
        IF "%4" DOES NOT EQUAL "" THEN ATTACH %4

This allows me to specify the login line in my AUTOEXEC on the backup station
as follows:

        F:LOGIN primary/ scndry1 scndry2 scndry3

LOGIN then prompts for the user ID and password, and promptly after logging
into the primary server under that ID and password, attaches to the secondary
servers using the same ID (whose passwords are synchronized with the one on
the primary server).

Of course, if I only use F:LOGIN or F:LOGIN primary/ or F:LOGIN scndry1/userid
or whatever, the normal and expected login takes place.  It's only when there
are extra parameters on the LOGIN command (which, incidentally, isn't clearly
explained even in the Folio-based HELP that came with our Netware 3.11 copies)
that the addtional attach(es) are performed.

Thanks to *all* who provided recommendations.  My apologies for being so
dense I didn't realize the applicability of login scripts to this purpose.

+-"Never Underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of mag tapes"--+
| J.Lance Wilkinson ("Lance")            BitNet:    JLW@PSULIAS.BITNET      |
| Systems Design Specialist - Lead       InterNet:  JLW@PSULIAS.PSU.EDU     |
| Library Computing Services         AT&T:(814) 865-1818 FAX:(814)863-3560  |
| E8 Pattee Library                      "I'd rather be dancing..."         |
| Penn State University         A host is a host from coast to coast,       |
| University Park, PA 16802     And no one will talk to a host that's close |
| <POSTMAST@PSULIAS.BITNET>     Unless the host that isn't close            |
| <POSTMAST@PSUCES.BITNET>      Is busy, hung or dead.                      |
+------"He's dead, Jim. I'll get his tricorder. You take his wallet."-------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Cal State Northridge - Baffairs
Priority:     normal
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 09:14:02 PST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         George Mansoor <GMANSOOR@BAFFAIRS.CSUN.EDU>
Subject:      Appleprinters and Novell Appletalk Queues

I have a NW2.15 server connected to an appletalk network.  Everything
works fine, but I was wondering if there is a way to "hide" the
appletalk printers so that if people want to print to this printer
they must go through the Novell Queues.

thanks

George

----------------------------------------------------------------------
George Mansoor                                    Cal State Northridge
Internet : gmansoor@baffairs.csun.edu          Business Systems - BMGT
Tel      : 818.885.4509                     Northridge, CA 91330 - USA
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:      UK.AC.QUB.V2; 17 NOV 92 13:30:47 GMT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:31:00 GMT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "A.J. Sheehan" <GRG1678@VAX2.QUEENS-BELFAST.AC.UK>
Subject:      Piping and network drives

Since the subject of piping in DOS has been brought up on a few occasions
I wonder if anyone might suggest an answer to a problem of mine involving just
such piping on  a network drive?

I want to run a batch command like:

if errorlevel 6 dir|sort

When I do this using ndos.com it works fine, when I do it with standard
command.com it fails. No error messages, no problems, no nothing: the pipe
just doesn't work. The dir command is not run (or not that I can see it
anyway) and its output is not piped into sort. A temp variable is set so
that can't be the problem and even doing it as supervisor doesn't help, so
inability to write temporary files to the root is not the problem either.

Any suggestions?

Tony Sheehan
grg1678@v2.qub.ac.uk

Queen's University, Belfast
Northern Ireland
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Return-Path: HOWARD@fs1.psy.emory.edu
Priority:     normal
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 14:08:24 EDT
Reply-To:     howard@fs1.psy.emory.edu
From:         "Howard A. Rollins, Jr." <HOWARD@FS1.PSY.EMORY.EDU>
Subject:      SMC Elite 10T/A

We have just installed one of the above cards in a ps2.  Cannot get a
packet driver that works properly in the card.  Anyone have an answer?

Have tried the old WD8003e driver and it does not work.  Also, the
driver on the floppy that came with the card doesn't work.  Card does
work with odi but we would prefer sticking to packet driver for now.

Thanks for any help.
Howard Rollins                      Phone: 404-727-7437
Department of Psychology            Email: howard@fs1.psy.emory.edu
Emory University                           or
Atlanta, Ga 30322                          psyhar@unix.cc.emory.edu
                                           or
                                           psyhara@emuvm1.bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via: uk.ac.dundee.pp; Mon, 16 Nov 1992 12:15:51 +0000
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 12:17:11 GMT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Andrew Swiffin <aswiffin@DUX.DUNDEE.AC.UK>
Subject:      EISA hard disk controllers

Hi,

Further to my recent posting about using an Adaptec 1740 to
drive a disk drive and an Exabyte simultaneously, i.e both off the
same card, I'd be interested to hear from ANYBODY who is doing this.

I'd also like to hear any reccomendations on other EISA SCSI
disk controllers or comments on the Adaptec 1740.

Please mail me directly to save on 'messages' and I'll post
a summary.  Sorry if this is a bit of a flogged subject, but
I've a bit of a crisis on in this area!

Thanks...  Andy
-------------------------
Andy Swiffin
Network support
Computing Service
Dundee University
Dundee.  Scotland

aswiffin@dux.dundee.ac.uk
From: loren@wmkt.wharton.upenn.edu (Loren Miller)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: PS/2 Model 80 with Windows 3.1 as 3.11 client
Keywords: ps/2, win 3.1, problems
Date: 17 Nov 92 21:39:39 GMT
Organization: Wharton Marketing

I have a few PS/2 Model 80-071s that I want to use with Netware 3.11 and 
Windows 3.1. I'm able to get them to work with Netware, using the wd8003e 
packet driver, pdipx, and netx, and I'm able to get them to work with 
Windows 3.1. But I'm not able to get them to work with both. I can trace the 
problem down to the packet driver. If the packet driver is loaded into 
memory then they will crash right out of windows. The advertising screen 
shows up but instead of going to the next screen windows crashes and leaves 
them at the dos prompt. They both have sufficient memory to go into 386 
enhanced mode. When I specify standard mode then they will load the next 
screen in windows but the mouse is invisible. It seems to me the problem 
might be in an interaction between the mouse driver, the packet driver, 
and windows, but I'm not sure how to deal with it. Has anybody run into this 
problem and solved it?

Thanks,
Loren
-- 
+++++++++++++++++++++++23
Loren Miller              LOREN@wmkt.wharton.upenn.edu
Shoes are the most basic prerequisite for liberty
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <MIKE@larse.com>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:18:00 LCL
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         MIKE <MIKE@LARSE.COM>
Subject:      Re: communication server

You will not be able to use Procomm with a network communications server
because Procomm does it i/o at the Hardware level bypassing any opertunity
for software to redirect to the server. This is true of the stand alone
version of Procomm+ as well. Their is network version of Procomm+ (PC+)
that will allow redirection. In order to use a communication server you
need a package that will support at a minimum the INT 14 interface, NCSI or
NASI are preferable in that they support modem control signals. There are
some TCP/IP methods for sharing modems, but almost no PC based software
will support them.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Organization: Palacky University Computer Center
X-Pmrqc:      1
Priority:     normal
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:42:12 MET
Reply-To:     pete%cvt.upol.cs@earn.cvut.cs
From:         Petr Volak <PETE%cvt.upol.cs@EARN.CVUT.CS>
Subject:      Re: X-Windows Software for ODI

The IBM's product "X-Windows for IBM DOS ( DOS X-SERVER) Program number
5765-025 ver. 2.1 should work with Excelan's Lan Workplace Network
Software ,too. ...think this is the same as ODI.

  ********************************************************************
  *  Peter Volak                                                     *
  *  Palacky University Computer Center  Internet: pete@cvt.upol.cs  *
  *  Olomouc, Czechoslovakia             Bitnet  : volak@csearn      *
  ********************************************************************
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: donp@novell.com (don provan)
Subject: Re: New Novell security suite
Organization: Novell, Inc., San Jose, California
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 08:10:30 GMT

In article <01GRB4WWAK048ZKHWU@CC.USU.EDU> Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET> writes:
>For core components such as CLIB and MATHLIBC, put
>them on a floppy and modify autoexec.ncf to use A: as a path prefix in the
>load statments. Then if the server is unhappy, restart it with SERVER -NA
>to omit reading autoexec.ncf, load install, edit out the A:, down/up the
>server and things should be intact again.

Another approach is to copy the new NLMs into a directory on the system
disk other than sys:system; let's call it sys:system\new.  Then instead
of editting each LOAD line as Joe suggests, at the beginning of your
autoexec.ncf file, add the directory containing the new NLMs to the
console's search list using the following command:

	search add 1 sys:system\new

Then if you have trouble with the new NLMs, you back out the new NLMs
by just commenting out the SEARCH command instead of taking the A: out
of every LOAD line.  As someone that spends a *lot* of time dealing
with unstable NLMs, i find manipulating search lists a much easier way
to control which set of NLMs gets loaded.

I also find it a lot easier to keep all NLMs on the NetWare volume,
although both Joe's suggestion and mine can be used regardless of
where you put the new NLMs.

> On the majority of the utilities
>in the suite: these are DOS executables and can be run from a local drive
>first and thus leave the older ones in place on the server. Once you are
>satisfied then move them to the server.

Again, you could put the DOS executables either on a local drive or in
some directory other than sys:public on a network drive.  If you want to
add some adventure to your life, you could even set up your more daring
users to scan the directory containing the new executables. ;-)

>        And here is another thought on the security files. They were published
>on NEWS as well as NetWire and ftp.is.sandy.novell.com. Guess which are the
>more reliable sources?  Ok, now guess which channel ultimately reaches more
>systems? Very good.

Am i the only one that doesn't know the answers to these questions?

>It is clear from the internal timestamps that
>Novell has taken a calculated risk in releasing the material at this time,
>and that risk was to provide some protection to customer sites Now, even if
>some bugs or incompatibilities remain undetected.

Well, i wasn't involved with the effort within Novell, but from all the
hubbub on netnews i can't blame them from taking some risks in order to
release something before the lynch mobs arrived in Provo.  :-)

						don provan
						donp@novell.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: DTRAN@emelnitz.ucla.edu (Daniel Tran)
Subject: Re: Cheyanne's Arcserve - any one out there using it ?
Organization: Arts Support Group
Date: 23 Nov 92 11:17:13 PST

I use Cheyenne ARcserve 4.0 and HP DAT.  Extremely happy with it.  I think 
problems are the result of hardware/software combination.  HP bundled their 
DAT, controller and arcserve 4.0 in one package and they are providing tech 
support.  Trying to deal with different vendors is not worth it.
Daniel - dtran@emelnitz.ucla.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:          UK.AC.MCC.NESSIE; 18 NOV 92 12:17:48 GMT
Organization: UMIST, Manchester, England
Priority:     normal
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 12:09:14 GMT
Reply-To:     b.wood@umist.ac.uk
From:         NOVNEWS@FS1.LI.UMIST.AC.UK
Subject:      Arcserve auto pilot

All

I have got a trial version of Arcserve but am having problems. I
cannot get through to the technical support people of the company
which supplied it (many pounds wasted listening to muzak) and so I
thought I would post the problem. If I try to create an auto pilot
set when I press <F2> for done the machine just hangs. If I run
arcserve from windows it (sometimes) gives the message:
"This application has violated system integrity due to execution of
an invalid instruction and will be terminated.

Quit all applications, auit windows, and then reset your computer."

I am running arcserve v4.00 netware v3.11 an HP dat device on an
Adaptec1542b card using the ASPI manager (whatever that is).

Any ideas or solutions?

Cheers

Brian Wood
UMIST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:27:11 -400
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         USCLM@EMUVM1.BITNET
Subject:      Problem with NW SAA v:1.2 gateway

I have a NW3.11 server running on an IBM PS/2 70-386. It has 2MB
ram on the system board and 8 MB of ram on an Enhanced memory expansion
adapter. The NW is a 10-user version servicing 9 users and a PSERVER
with 1 RPRINTER. The machine also has a Novell Synchronous Adapter for
SAA installed and is running the NW SAA v:1.2 software.

The problem is that the server ABENDs with NMIs. If I try to dump the
10MB of RAM to diskette, it bombs on the first diskette with a

111
?????

error in the upper-right corner of the screen. This looks some-what
like a POST error, but see no reason why it would appear after the machine
has been running for a few days.

We can reproduce the problem by running a clipper program on a workstation
that merges records into a large DBF (less than 2mb in size). I was shocked
to see that a client program could bomb the server. Does anyone have a
suggestion? We have replaced the system board because the 111 error in
the POST indicates the processor errored in trying to go into protected
mode (which I find erroneous, but a clipper program bombing a server
is weird too).

Please reply to me directly and I will post a summary.

Thanks,
Craig Myers
Emory University
Computing Center
USCLM@EMUVM1
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU