HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ljm40@amdahl.com (Lisa Malachowsky)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Homos at Depth
Date: 21 Nov 92 01:38:22 GMT
Reply-To: ljm40@amdahl.com (Lisa Malachowsky)
Organization: Amdahl Corp, Sunnyvale, CA

THERE ARE LOTS OF HOMOS WHO DIVE!!! Not only is there a Northern California 
Club now called the Northern California Rainbow Divers, but there is a So Cal 
Club called the Barnacle Busters, a Florida club and a NY club out of 
Greenwich Village.  If you want information, keep looking.		

There are over 100 members in the No Cal club (I am one of them). There is 
even a newly formed alliance of all of the Gay clubs. 		


There is also a yearly event planned which is called the Scuba Jamboree for 
which all of the clubs just TAKE OVER a resort for a gay ol' time. 
Xref: sparky soc.motss:47990 alt.politics.homosexuality:7312 co.politics:2129
From: mara@panix.com (Mara Chibnik)
Subject: Re: Today's NY Times
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 14:05:34 GMT
Organization: (getting there)


richard@Apple.COM (a flying squirrel) writes:
 >Mara Chibnik writes:
  >>Recently the pace has picked up.  Since the presidential campaign
  >>these topics have been hot in all the media.  The _Times_ at least
  >>is keeping up with things.  Today's paper had the following articles 
  >>(that I caught):
 >I picked up that issue yesterday at the hotel gift shop and read it 
 >through my lunch of consomme and cheese raviolis with pesto that was
 >*to* *die* *for*.  I saw all of the articles you have mentioned, and
 >wondered if NYT was always like this.

That was about the third or fourth day running where I'd been aware
that Rod couldn't possibly keep up with the volume.  It's not
_always_ like that, but it's become more like that recently.

Last spring I saw an article on their editorial policies, maybe in
the Sunday Magazine.  I remember that they talked about instituting
stylistic changes, including using "Ms." in mentioning women and also
not insisting on an honorific for a woman when they wouldn't for a
man.  I seem to recall that the article mentioned that the editor
had dismissed requests for these changes as unimportant, and that he
was startled at how appreciative staff and readers were when they
went into effect.  I'm not sure whether there is any reason to
associate the (more recent) expanded coverage of glb* topics with
these stylistic changes, but I do.  Maybe that's just because
they're both things I'm glad to see.

 >Now that I've dumped the Chronicle
 >(except Sundays -- gotta have that Pink Section), perhaps I should
 >subscribe.  Until I can get Headline News on my Dick Tracy watch, of course.
Do Dick Tracy watches have special glb* headline services?  Do they
offer a choice of headline services?

 >Now it this nyc.motss dinner (T-1.5 hours) turns out to be as pleasantly
 >surprising ;^) I may even return to Manhattan again.
We await your supreme judgment, oh flying one...


-- 

  Mara Chibnik
  mara@panix.com                Life is too important to be taken seriously.

Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: mattm@apple.com (Matthew Melmon)
Subject: Re: Sucking on Keanu Reeves
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:07:45 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.
Followup-To: soc.motss

In article <BxvDro.BwB@hpuerca.atl.hp.com>, kfj@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kirk
Johanning) wrote:

> I much prefer Brian Austin Green (David Silver on the show).  Now 
> there is a boyish face to DIE for, or at least salivate profusely :-)...  

Now, which one is Mr. Green?  The Squirrel and I were pouring over
the little dornknob-write-tab-dealy-bop he purchased in Hawaii,
and the one on the end does have a certain appeal - he is the other
dark-haired one, I hope.  The sandy-blonde is a bit of a goober,
at least on the tablet.  I must concur that the other brunette
is yummy - but I must rise up in indignant horror at your suggestion
that he is *more* *yummy* than Jason Priestley (side burns or
no, thank you very much).  Besides, of the males in the publicity
shot, Jason has by far the most natural pose.  The others have
their foreheads all wrinkled up.  Even Mr. Perry.

Tut, tut.  Not very professional, that...  whot?

*X* 
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: mike@gordian.com (Michael A. Thomas)
Subject: Re: Marky Mark and Calvin Klein (was Re: Scott Masden)
Organization: Gordian; Costa Mesa, CA
Distribution: na,uk
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 19:47:32 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.160946.17622@spdcc.com>, rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue) writes:
> 	Huh? Too many pronouns!

   Well, it all made sense when I wrote it :-)
 
> 	The beef I have is mostly with the 2nd to last clause,
> "just don't do that shit around me"...  which can imply open sexual
> acts (which is absurd) and carries with it some kind of
> "all gays just have sex with anything at the drop of a hat" or
> "All fags want to fuck me" (free clue, hon we don't...) or implies
> just openly homosexual social behavior which translates to the
>  "I support gays if they would just keep it to themselves and not 
> flaunt it" canard.  It would have been easier had he been more explicit
> as to what "that shit" meant, I doubt it was positive.

  I don't disagree with the sentiment you are finding in the words,
but there is probably more to it than that; don't you think? The
entire paragraph was rather crass and as such is undoubtably tied
to a "street talk" kind of mentality (anything which begins with "Yo!"
is what clues me in). Certainly this is a rather machoeque kind of
speech, but does it actually tell you much about the true attitude
about the person? I'm not as convinced.

>  Poor Mikey  probably didn't have time for English classes...

  Well, neither did Marky, which is why this is not at all clear.


> 	So which is it?  Neither is very appealing nor supportive.

  I agree with this. The first time I read it I had your *exact*
same reaction. In fact, I mis-read the attribution originally, and
was about to send off a nasty followup until I finally noticed
where the attribution was coming from. After thinking a bit about
what little I know about street culture (which ain't much), I 
decided that it is possible that it has more to do with *image*,
(whether it is real in his case or feigned, I haven't a clue)
rather than actual lack of support. Given the other positive 
*actions* people have been attributing to him, I figured
he was worth the benefit of the doubt. Nothing more.

> Finding someone *isn't* outwardly homophobic doesn't mean they are
> "OK".  

  Well, I don't think that I said that. 
 
> 	Is he from Boston?  (That's what I'm inferring...)
> Well, you know how uptight those Bostonians are..... (or just
> "tight"), right Mike?  :-)

  Well, far be it for me to keep up with these teeny-bopper thangs,
but I seem to recall hearing that NKOTB are from Boston -- and by
extention Marky Mark too. Oh yes, I've had a few tight Bostonians; 
it just that damn accent they need to lose. :-)
-- 

		Michael Thomas	(mike@gordian.com)
	"I don't think Bambi Eyes will get you that flame thrower..."  
		-- Hobbes to Calvin
		USnail: 20361 Irvine Ave Santa Ana Heights, Ca,	92707-5637
		PaBell: (714) 850-0205 (714) 850-0533 (fax)
From: aberson@enh.nist.gov
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: RE: Can anyone tell me about this TV show?
Date: 20 Nov 92 22:15:45 GMT
Organization: NIST

In a previous article, nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) wrote:
>"The number of people in America who use electric shavers is X.  (the
>control group). The number of people in America with cancer who use
>electric shavers is Y. Y is much greater than X, implying that the two
>are correlated."

Am I missing something?  Y seems to be a subset of X, if I am reading
correctly, so Y cannot be greater than X.

>Nelson, who can't stand electric razors.

Agreed.  I never thought I'd prefer a regular blade, but I started
using one a few weeks ago.  Maybe now I won't get cancer?

Sim Aberson   Ft. Lauderdale, FL   aberson%3328.span@sdsc.edu
"Home is where your roof landed" - t-shirt seen in Miami
Hate, bigotry, and discrimination are not family values, even in
Colorado and Tampa.
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: mccombj@alleg.edu (The Great Gazoo)
Subject: Re: Marky Mark and Calvin Klein (was Re: Scott Masden)
Organization: Allegheny College
Distribution: na,uk
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 00:59:55 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.172253.29546@spdcc.com> rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob  
Donahue) writes:
> omt1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
> >dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) >writes:

{Hope I haven't assigned quotes to the wrong people!}

> >"Marky Mark hasn't seen the Gap ads yet [nor have I...anyone?],
> >but if he'd been near Hyde Park in London last August, he might
> >have wondered why the biggest cheer on the Lesbian and Gay Pride
> >march was for a passing double decker bus.
> 
> >"'That's dope, man! I particularly like pussy, but everybody's
> 
> 	Ooooh - so BUTCH - I wonder how womyn feel about this
> categorization...
> 
> >got their sexual preference. A lot of deep people [rappers] don't
> >feel it's God's will, but that doesn't bother me and people
> >really do have the right to do what they want. 
> 
> >And if they're
> >into me, then cool, as long as they don't try to offend me and
> >are into my music. 
> 
> 	Translation - I support queers if they give my $$$.  Oh, joy.

Not exactly... I interpret this as his wanting to be taken seriously as an  
_artist_, not just as a body.

> >I know a lot of gay people and I respect them,
> >and you don't have to worry about getting stuck up by a gay dude.
> >Yo, if you're gay you're in the house, just don't do that shit
> >around me! Don't try to fuck me!...
> 
> 	THIS is *SUPPORT*?

"Don't try to fuck me" does not imply a lack of support; it only states  
that such is not _his_ orientation.

~~__ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
\/ .\   Joe McCombs  a / k / a  mccombj@alleg.edu   ______  __
/\__/    . o   __           .  .                   /o   ) \/ /
   .  .      \/ o\    Fish heads, fish heads,   .  \____)_/\_\
o	 .   /\__/        Roly-poly fish heads,            .
   o .             Fish heads, fish heads,       .  
          o     Eat them up, YUM!              @    {||}       @
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance)
Subject: Re: Marky Mark and Conch Fritters
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 05:29:11 GMT

Marky Mark has crotch critters?

--
John Dorrance        * Sexyfunky Motherfuckerdiva *   thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu

		I bet if you threw that ass into the air
			It'd turn into sunshine!
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: mhr@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Mike Reaser)
Subject: Re: Bob Dole Quote
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:26:22 GMT
Organization: a stone mountain of Kudzu

In <wood.722026167@jfred> wood@siemens.com. (Jim Wood) writes:

>anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:

>>tab@blitzen.cc.bellcore.com (biederman,thomas) writes:

>>>Bob Dole, Republican of Kansas, the Senate minority leader, on
>>>Mr. Clinton's plan to lift the ban on homosexuals in the armed forces:

>>>Sounds like something from the 1940's to me         

>>Dole always sounds more like 1840s to me.  When does he next
>>stand for election?

>The asshole was just re-elected to another 6-year term.  He next
>stands for re-election in 1998 (gasp!) when he'll be 75 years old.

And to think we came _that close_ (picture of bear holding thumb and
forefinger tightly together) to having Dole as Vice President.

Shudder.

--
=======================================================================
 Mike Reaser, Hewlett-Packard N. Amer. Response Center - Atlanta
 Internet:  mhr@hpuerca.atl.hp.com
 NBCS: B4 f w g+ k s-               I barely speak for myself, so
 #include <standard.disclaimer>       don't make me speak for HP
=======================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: gsmith@clio.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith)
Subject: Re: Military Madness (was: Gay Sailor Reinstated)
Organization: IWR, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 12:44:45 GMT

In article <2b0a6962@ThreeL.co.uk> jf@threel.co.uk (John Fisher)
writes: 
In article <1992Nov14.133815.8302@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>,

>You expect me to believe that there's constitutional
>protection for everyone to troll around carrying automatic
>weapons in the name of freedom but people aren't allowed to
>have oral sex?  That the highest court in the land is going
>to sit down and with full constitutional majesty send you
>to *jail* for *sucking* *cock*?  C'mon.

Of course he didn't go to jail for sucking cock.  Such people do not
exist in the US Air Force.  He went to jail for muff-diving.

-- 
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/IWR/Ruprecht-Karls University 
               gsmith@kalliope.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
From: pfritsch@skid.ps.uci.edu (Paul Fritschle)
Subject: Re: Not Enough Sucking on Keanu
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Organization: Miskatonic University Department of Computer Science
Distribution: usa
Date: 16 Nov 92 21:35:34 GMT

mattm@apple.com (Matthew Melmon) writes:

>In article <1992Nov15.235449.19817@Princeton.EDU>,
>spencer@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (S. Spencer Sun) wrote:

>> Well, maybe he DID spend the whole movie trapped in the castle, even if
>> they didn't always have him on screen.  (Pity!)

>No, no.  I refuse to be mollified.  The nympho scene was simply not
>long enough; or, there were not enough.  I wanted nympho blood suckers
>in the morning, in the afternoon, and in the evening.  I mean, if we
>had to put up with the poor English accent - then we damn well 
>deserve to have seen some SKIN for our troubles...
>We DID get a good glimpse of a very hard little male nipple, though... 

Whose? Whose?! Inquiring minds want to know...
--

Paul Fritschle                                         pfritsch@skid.PS.UCI.EDU
                 Have you hugged YOUR shoggoth today?
Xref: sparky soc.motss:48341 talk.politics.misc:60786 ca.politics:9666
From: owen@autodesk.com (D. Owen Rowley)
Newsgroups: soc.motss,talk.politics.misc,ca.politics
Subject: Re: A Strand of Bigotry
Date: 19 Nov 92 01:12:05 GMT
Followup-To: soc.motss

In article <1992Nov18.175112.18229@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>, gsmith@lauren.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith) writes:
> In article <mattm-171192134108@mcmelmon.apple.com> mattm@apple.com
> (Matthew Melmon) writes:
> 
> >You are in error.  Liberalism follows a totalitarian paradigm, but it
> >is not fascism.  Both are instances of the same class, which has no
> >particular name.  They invovle the glorification of _Law_, and the
> >compulsion of individual choice to 'acceptable' behavior, as dictated by
> >_Law_.  
 
> This sounds like a pretty good description of the conservative point of
> view to me.

Yes, I agreed with it completely.
But don't tell Jess i said that, it would spoil his supper.

LUX ./. owen

--
D. Owen Rowley {uunet,fernwood,sun}!autodesk!owen

  " It will be a cold March 17th that I celebrate the imposition of
	Romes rule, on Pagan Ireland. Erin go ppphhhhhttttttt! "
Newsgroups: soc.motss,talk.politics.misc,ca.politics
From: gsh7w@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy)
Subject: Re: A Strand of Bigotry
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:03:33 GMT

In article <13208@optilink.UUCP> cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:
#So why is there a right to practice sodomy?

Because it is a private matter between consenting adults. Didn't you
know that?

#Remember: liberalism IS fascism.
only where freedom is slavery, i.e, 1984.

--
-Greg Hennessy, University of Virginia
 USPS Mail:     Astronomy Department, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475 USA
 Internet:      gsh7w@virginia.edu  
 UUCP:		...!uunet!virginia!gsh7w
From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Fundamentalists and the clitoris
Date: 18 Nov 92 04:54:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: spdcc.1992Nov18.045452.1505
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA

In article <1ebvacINNna7@mizar.usc.edu> adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:
>solovay@netcom.com (Andrew M. Solovay) writes:
>> I say this because in almost every mammal species, male nipples
>> and clitorises are *entirely* nonfunctional,
>> since they are not
>> stimulated by sexual contact.
>
>Hey, bud, *MY* nipples are stimulated by sexual contact.
>Hell, my nipples are stimulated by the mere thought of sexual contact.

Arne, you forget that he's a Republican.  That explains why his nipples
are numb.  I'm not sure why he thinks he has a non-functioning clitoris.

-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
From: James Binder <jbinder@igc.apc.org>
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Date: 17 Nov 92 18:02 PST
Subject: Re: Amnesty International
Nf-ID: #R:mjh4.721934451@crux1.cit.cornell:791345089:cdp:1475900065:000:158
Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!jbinder    Nov 17 18:02:00 1992


Earlier this year Amnesty did add sexual preference as one of
their "protected rights", however they have as yet to write
up guidelines or take on any cases.

Xref: sparky soc.motss:48443 talk.politics.misc:60892 ca.politics:9698
From: gsmith@clio.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith)
Newsgroups: soc.motss,talk.politics.misc,ca.politics
Subject: Re: A Strand of Bigotry
Date: 19 Nov 92 17:33:24 GMT
Organization: IWR, University of Heidelberg, Germany

In article <mattm-181192110253@mcmelmon.apple.com> mattm@apple.com
(Matthew Melmon) writes:

>If you mean my blurb was of the conservative point of view, perhaps 
>you are correct.

Your blurb seems to me to be the mark's point of view.

>'Conservatives' favor a strong enforcement of laws by government.
>That much is true.  Conservatives generally prefer fewer laws to more,
>however.  

If by 'conservative' you mean the people who actually run for office,
this just isn't true any more.  It is a con game for suckers.  They
*say* they are for getting the government off our backs, and fiscal
responsibility, and all kinds of things.  They *do* just the opposite.

>I suspect you are trying to cast the 'conservative' and
>'fundamentalist' positions as one in the same.  This, however, is more
>a recent phenomena than a historical one.

It's been a long time since Goldwater, a longer time since Taft.
I'm talking about realities.

-- 
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/IWR/Ruprecht-Karls University 
               gsmith@kalliope.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: mccombj@alleg.edu (The Great Gazoo)
Subject: Re: Amnesty International
Organization: Allegheny College
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 14:45:10 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.182103.13762@rtsg.mot.com> houser@rtsg.mot.com  
(Elizabeth J. Houser) writes:
> In article <mjh4.721934451@crux1.cit.cornell.edu>  
mjh4@crux1.cit.cornell.edu (Mark Jonathan Handel) writes:
> >Does anyone know if Amnesty International recognizes sexual
> >preference as one of their "protected" rights - I remember
> >hearing something that the global organization, based in 
> >London does not, while the US organization does.
> >
> 
> I remember reading about their decision to include sexual orientation
> a few months ago.  Unfortunately, they seem reluctant to state it
> in literature that they send out in mass mailings.  I received a 4
> page letter from them two weeks ago asking me to donate funds, but
> not ONCE in the letter did they mention that their agenda included
> fighting for the rights of people imprisoned solely because of their
> sexual orientation.  They DID mention a list of other protected
> rights.  I perceived this omission as a way for Amnesty to get funds
> from someone who might not contribute if their full agenda was made
> known.
> 
> Has anyone else seen a mailing like this?  Can anyone verify that
> sexual orientation was added to their list of protected rights?
> 
> -Liz

I am a member of Allegheny College's chapter of Amnesty, and this is the  
first I've heard about sexual orientation being mentioned in the mandate.   
Now, I must admit, I'm not the most active member... so I'm going to  
assume that Mark's right and this clause has been added recently.

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Joe McCombs... but you can call me <mccombj@alleg.edu>...
"I'm still standing, after all this time...
 Picking up the pieces of my life without you on my mind..."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: TXK025@maccvm.corp.mot.com (Eddie Chandler)
Subject: JEFF Gallagher where are you?
Organization: Motorola
Date: 20 Nov 1992 04:06:32 CST


Jeff, please e-mail me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Eddie Chandler.
Newsgroups: soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality,co.politics,co.general,talk.politics.misc,co.politics.amend2.discuss,boulder.general,csu.general
From: dickerso@fester.dell.com (Russell Dickerson - X2787)
Subject: Re: Colorado Amendment 2: The First Fatality
Reply-To: dickerso@cpat.stortek.com
Organization: IO SpecialistsConsulting
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:54:16 GMT

ltp@uswest.com (Halfman-Halfmachine) writes:

>they should also pay taxes like everyone else. Isn't the Catholic
>church one of the biggest money making organizations in the world?

Get some education!!  Sure, the Catholic Church has the most, its also 
worldwide.  Even a penny, spread to every city in the world, looks like 
a lot when its totaled up.  If you want to talk rich, look to the protestant
churches where one chuch has an operating budget of millions (ie Tilton, PTL,
Oral Roberts, etc) with noone to account to.

I think that all churches think about any more is money, including the Catholic
Church (I was raised Catholic but don't attend there anymore).  I think they've
all lost sight of what their purpose is: to educate people in the laws of God,
as written in the bible.  It's funny that they loose sight of the fact that 
God gave us free will to make a moral decision on our own.  They'ld rather
make the decision for us and save us the temptation.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell Dickerson	Unix/X Consultant	IOSpecialists
(303) 673-2787 ---REPLY TO>>> dickerso@cpat.stortek.com <<<!!!!--------
For every vision, there is an equal and opposite Congressional revision.
From: black@lester.sybase.com (Chris Black)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Re: Lesbianville on 20/20
Keywords: soc.lesbian, soc.muffdiver, soc.dykes, soc.pimply.teenaged.boys
Date: 16 Nov 92 19:06:11 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.234027.3306@beaver.cs.washington.edu>, wendyt@cs.washington.edu (Wendy Thrash) writes:
|> In article <1992Nov5.114046.27870@netcom.com> cjlee@netcom.com (Caroline Jean Lee) writes:
|> >If there IS a group formed for lg women, may I suggest the name
|> >soc.muffdiver?
|> 
|> Inaccurate and exclusionary.  Lesbian != muffdiver.  (That's C for not equal.)

Both exclusuionary, *and* too inclusive.  I have, to my delight, meant
plenty of muff-diving men.  There are lots of female cocksuckers out
there, too.

Any theories as to why "muffdiver" and "cocksucker" are assumed to mean
motss muffdiver or motss cocksucker?

-- Chris
black@sybase.com
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: jbibb@eng.auburn.edu (John S. Bibb)
Subject: Re: Marky Mark and Calvin Klein
Reply-To: jbibb@eng.auburn.edu
Organization: Auburn University Engineering
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 17:51:03 GMT

In article 11529@wam.umd.edu, lovegod@wam.umd.edu (Donald Andrew Agarrat) writes:
> In article <1992Nov13.135349.11877@bsu-ucs>  
> 01klcampbell@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu (Kenton Campbell) writes:
[snip]
> I think this statement of yours proves my point on how most Gay  
> men are nothing but dogs in heat.
> 
> Donald - Nigger Stompin' African!

I thought that the phrase was "BITCH in heat" ;-)

P.S.  Announcing the creation of several new Shar-Pei's  a la Miss Maudine and Mr. Muttley.
BTW- this also violates ALABAMA's misconduct laws.....  Details on January!




Newsgroups: soc.motss