HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Vacation
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:38:51 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <1992Mar31.060542.8137@baron.uucp>, ladage@pnet07.cts.com (Kenneth
David Ladage) writes:
> 
> Amazing.  Abso-fucking-lutly amazing.
> 
> I leave for two weeks.

You'll probably even find it more abso-fucking-lutly amazing that we didn't
miss you even a little bit.

> I come back.

More's the pity.

> I read 219 posts and...POOF! 
> 
>                        NOTHING HAS CHANGED!
>                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

New around here, are you?  Clearly, this comes as a big surprise to you.  It
might interest you to know that nothing has changed on alt.flame since 1977.

Idiots come.  Idiots go.  You're a data point for _both_ those cases, by the
way.  Posting the same inane message twice, for instance.

> Ah...how we never learn...

Speak for yourself, John Alden.

>                                         Until Wisdom Prevails,

Heh.  You wouldn't know "wisdom" if it broke all your arms and legs.

And then, as if the point weren't already sufficiently proven, in article
<1992Mar31.062508.8546@baron.uucp>, ladage@pnet07.cts.com (Kenneth David Ladage)
writes:
> 
> Sorry.  One time just wasn't enought for this topic.

Au contraire, mon frere: it was much more than enough.  Why don't you trundle
along?  Take your comic books and your "evolutionary scale" with you when you
go.  And, hey, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (From A to B)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts TO Justify "Queer Nation"
Date: 7 Apr 92 12:27:00 GMT
Distribution: world,public
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
> Sodomy is as pleasurable as taking a crap - but at least taking a
> crap serves a useful purpose.

So what's your excuse?


mathew

-- 
Hail Eris! / "Our whole economy's based on fear and death; how long can we get
away with this?" --- Jello Biafra / Message for Kodak: Bring back Dan Bredy! /
PGP RSA public key available on request / Desperately seeking Negativland's U2
CD / Just another would-be Mac owner put off by Apple's monopolistic practices
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Accusations of Heterophobia (WAS Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts...)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 21:46:34 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star) writes:

> In article <1992Apr13.130757.842@gacvx2.gac.edu>
> karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) writes, in an
> apparently pathetic attempt to redirect attention:
> 
> >In article heterophobe <83824@bu.edu>  writes:
> 	    ^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Perhaps you'd like to tell us all why you've decided to label me
> this way. I know several special friends who'd be MOST interested.


Haw! Haw! Haw! - Same logic you puppies use with your crap.. 

Eat it!

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bis@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bis)
Subject: Re: Welcome Melvin Gladstone, net. celeb.
Organization: Bis Information Services
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 01:55:02 GMT

In article <-o2H!**p6@cs.psu.edu> krobinsn@playpen.state.university (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>In article <0ce6iB7w164w@GeoWare.COM> efudd@GeoWare.COM (Elmer Fudd) writes:
>>mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone) writes:
>>
>>> Melvin M. Gladstone
>>
>>Hi Melvin.  My name's Elmer.  In a former lifetime, I was Moses.  Back
>>when I was heir to the Pharoah's throne, I woulda been "Glad-to-stone"
>>you.  Are you a heeb too?
>
>You are misinformed.

You are a broken record.

>                     Melvin is a cat, for Melvin posts from a catbox.

By that logic, you have shit for brains, because you post from an
intellectual sewer.

>A thinking process is in order here.

Exactly.  So you stay out of it.

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: Jacob A. Vanier <vanier@cs.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: OGGLEs Are FUCKING LAME!
X-Backmasking: !sehsotnicaM sevol adzovH cirE
Keywords: Rick plays with blocks
X-Political-Statement: Barry G. Morgan for President in 2032!
X-Whoosh: WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH
Organization: Whooshers of America (WoA!)
X-Oggle:  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  OGGLE  
X-Subliminal-Message: Rick is an Idiot!
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 05:07:04 GMT

In article <9204111238.48@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>
>And you are a misanthrope.
>
>-- 
>
>Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.UUCP	unixland!rmkhome!rmk	rmk@frog.UUCP

Again I read more misrepresentations, dissimulations, ungrounded, and unfounded
statements.  K e n does not despise, detest, nor loathe mankind.  Nay, K e n 
finds great humor and amusement from the lowly plebians who think themselves
worthy of corresponding with him.  Their hypocrisy, and their lack of knowledge
in such simple tasks as flaming and educating their peers will never cease to 
amuse K e n in his daily routine.

Rick eloquently demonstrates that he is misinformed.  No more needs to be said!

Jacob A. Vanier
vanier@cs.psu.edu
From: bufalini@through.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This newsgroup has gone to hell!
Date: 8 Apr 92 00:41:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: atlantis.zx+vHgmmk6
Reply-To: bufalini@through.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Distribution: na
Organization: PENN$YLVANIA $TATE UNIVER$ITY

In article <22434@goofy.Apple.COM>, lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
|> In article <$6&vHfwkb6@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Steely
|> Dildo) writes:
|> > 
|> > This is a miserable attempt to flame.
|> 
|> Well, at least you're consistent.

Yes, I am consistent in that no one other than K e n  and I can flame.  You
certainly can't.
From: ricke@amc.com (Rick Eggers)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Flame alert
Keywords: Flame alert
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:09:33 GMT
Organization: Flame Alert Alarm Co.

********************FLAME ALERT******************
The fledgling news group REC.ORG.MENSA is in the
middle of a flame war! Just imagine the ranting 
and raving that is bound to happen when you get 
a bunch of GENUISES arguing about god, racism,
and the ancestry of certian posters. BUT, as 
highly intellegant as these posters think they
are, they have not developed the highly honed
skill of flaming that those of this group have
attained. This group DESERVES your participation!
Please subscribe now and lend your talents to a
noble cause. They may be genuises, but even 
genuises need teachers to learn how best to 
flame. Thank you for your support.
***************end of FLAME ALERT*****************
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6466 alt.politics.homosexuality:1948
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 00:31:38 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

> I hope you're doing great penance for every girlfriend you've had with
> whom you've broken up, punk.  So unnatural.  So deviant.

Whenever I have gotten involed in that level, I did think that it was going
to last...  Thats the thing though, occasionally is doesn't work out, something
happens.  Man, you are fucking ignorant.  Look, my wife died in a car accident
three years ago June, and you'd have me burning in hell for thinking that it
was going to last forever.  Fuck you.

You'd rather be able to sick your weenie in every ass that you see, and you
legitimize that by attacking the monogomists.

Look, I happen to like the "family" idea, and I really do hope that things
work out between my and my new girlfriend, we have been talking about getting
married.  Hopefully nothing will happen to ruin it.

You are so ignorant it amazes me.


Xref: sparky alt.flame:6890 alt.politics.homosexuality:2204 alt.sex:14679
From: robertj@Autodesk.COM (Young Rob Jellinghaus)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:50:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: autodesk.11074
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Autodesk Inc., Sausalito CA, USA

In article <8X30iB2w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>robertj@Autodesk.COM writes:
>> It's rather enjoyable to see djk reduced to guilt-by-association with
>> the dread "PC philosophy" as his _only_ argument against homo-
>> sexuality.  We blew all his "facts" to hell--like the time he was
>> sniveling, "Homophobia's a bogus word--it isn't in any dictionary,"
>> we told him otherwise, and he whined, "Lot of junk words in there."
>
>It is true.. So what's the problem..

No problem, djk.  You say something, we show you you're wrong, you
retreat to insults and blathering.

>"Statement is only .001% of a fact.." -djk
>
>Ever consider that have more valid content in ten wordsthen you do in
>a thousand. ;)

No, I never considered that, djk.  Especially since it doesn't make
any sense.  You are progressively abandoning all ability to argue
coherently and rationally, as we rebut you every time you try to make
a factual statement.  Now you're even losing your grasp of English
grammar.  At this rate, it won't be long before you forget how to
type... speed the day!

>If  _I_ were to get many short replies to my effortsat 'much speaking'
>_I_ might begin  to consider that my words did not mean diddly to 
>someone else.... 

Aha.  So you admit that our words don't mean diddly to you.  Good: now
we know that you don't have any sort of real position, and are just
spewing garbage onto the net because you don't have anything better
to do.  (We knew that already, but thank you for proving us right.)

You're not very convincing, though, djk; you do listen to what we say,
because you know now you can't get away with posting lies.  So you
go for the zero-content insult.  It's fun seeing you devolve.

>A few words is all that most of the blibbering I see here is worth. :)

Most of the blibbering is yours.

>> Go ahead, djk.  Try giving us some _factual_ examples of ways in which
>> gay liberation is tantamount to the advent of fascism.
>
>All I said was that many of the manipulation techniques being used
>by gays in their 'liberation' effort are identical to those used
>by the nazis. It is true.

Way to avoid the point, djk.  I asked for _factual_ examples.  Whining
"It is true!" doesn't qualify.  And neither do you.

--
Rob Jellinghaus                | "Next time you see a lie being spread or
Autodesk, Inc.                 |  a bad decision being made out of sheer
Internet: robertj@Autodesk.COM |  ignorance, pause, and think of hypertext."
AMIX: RJELLINGHAUS             |    -- K. Eric Drexler, _Engines of Creation_
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: His friend and nobody else's, Kevin Darcy!
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 92 03:27:58 GMT

In article <H.9KkGgT4jET2@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
>In <1992Mar29.055700.26223@rotag.mi.org>, Kevin Darcy writes:
>>
>>I did not "inflict" [sic] that thread on news.admin. Keegan did. Both of my 
>>replies to Keegan in that thread consisted of terse attempts to redirect the 
>>discussion back to alt.flame. In the same circumstances, what would _you_ 
>>have done differently, John?
>
>    Well, Kevin, I never would have been in the situation in the first 
>place, ...

Oh, really, how do you prevent malicious immature little brats like
Keegan from crossposting your inflammatory threads from alt.flame to 
news.admin??? What's your secret? Does it involve Orbiting Mind Control 
Lasers, by any chance??

>...and, as a regular reader of news.admin, I distinctly recall you
>responding to more than just Keegan's posts there, mostly with 
>justifications for why the thread was appropriate to news.admin. 

That was months ago, and about a totally different issue. If you wish to 
dredge up ancient history, please demonstrate the relevance first.

>    And incidendently, why the (sic) after inflict? This, if I remember 
>an old Clay Bond posting correctly, is meant to denote that there is 
>some doubt that the word has been used or spelled correctly. 

Clay Bondage is full of shit, as usual. "Sic" serves the _general_ purpose of
highlighting a word, or sometimes a whole phrase, as being LITERALLY QUOTED.
It therefore has many uses; not just the one Clayhead ascribes to it. It CAN
be used to highlight the fact that the original was misspelled (in case there
is a doubt as to whether the person quoting made a transcription error). But,
it can also be used to, for example, clarify the meaning of double quotes.
In my sentence, it would not have been 100% clear whether I was using double 
quotes as "scare quotes", or as literal quote indicators. The use of "[sic]"
forced the issue.

>However, 
>as the definition of the word with that spelling is " to impose, or to 
>afflict with something painful", I'd say the usage was correct, and the
>spelling certainly is, though I know you woudn't stoop to spelling flames.

"Stooping" is in the mind of the beholder, John. Spelling flames have their
place. Mostly I use them to deflate pretentious windbags, or, my favorite,
people who have recently launched a spelling flame of their own. But, most
of the time, spelling errors, like the one you just made (probably 
intentionally), don't really bother me to the point of provoking flames.

								- Kevin
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6946 alt.politics.homosexuality:2251
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Thursday, 16 Apr 1992 09:28:48 EDT
From: Tim Bieling <QAA@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
 <1992Apr16.033425.29248@amhux2.amherst.edu>

In article <1992Apr16.033425.29248@amhux2.amherst.edu>,
twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) says:
>
>In article <2Zs8iB2w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>>Maybe you guys have had some lame heterosexual
>>encounters.

Jack - Hardly!  The het encounters I had were quite intense, but
for me, sex with men goes way beyond any het experience I had.
(or, i should say, sex with the right guy, not just any guy)

>
>I simply like hugging men, and kissing them.  I like brushing beards,
>and hairy chests, and kissing nipples with that musky male smell
>filling my nostrils.  I like to stroke mens' bodies, feel their
>musculature and dusky bodies.  And I love the feeling of having a
>long, hard cock in my mouth.

Tim - So well put! :)  (Sorry, I don't have a beard tho)

-Tim
From: 6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: k a r s t e n  corrects Keegan's crap
Date: 16 Apr 92 02:50:57 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.130020.841@gacvx2.gac.edu> karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) continues to be shrill:

>Hilarious.

Thank you, Masked Man.

>I was being sarcastic, just like you are now.  You
>happen to be the one with the hyperelevated self-opinion, Chrissy,
>since you think yourself so high and mighty that you and Keegan
>can tell others what to think. 
 
I've never told you what to think.  I can't come up with anything
in your case, except the word *vacuum*.

[Stuff about how Karsick Headcheese doesn't care what gays think
of straights hacked out for brevity]

>> All of us here would be just as happy if you would drop the subject,
>> Harddeck.

>Why don't WE put that to a vote?  Or wait, you have already?
>I want to see the results, pronto.  I'm sure it would make you
>happy to live in a world where no one dares disagree with 
>Christpher Wade Skinner, but that expectation is in line with 
>conquering Gaul and dividing it into three parts. I see the usual 
>politically correct hypocrisy coming into play here.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ah, the sound of buzzwords in the distance, and the waving of red
flags at bulls.  Spring has come to gac.edu.  If you really don't
care what gays think about your sexuality, stop sharing your
views.

Drop the issue and so will I.  That's hardly hypocrisy.  I think
*disgusting* and *abnormal* are loaded words that can have severe,
real world consequence if enogh people believe them.  What *do*
you advocate, oh mighty Saltlick?

>> No one objects to your sexuality.  Your rating and raving and
>> comments about what is 'normal' and what is not prove that it is
>> you who have the problem.

>More bullshit and weak assertions.  And you are right about my
>having a problem with thought cops like you and Keegan.  

How am I a thought cop?  How am I associated with Jim Junior?  You
call people abnormal and disgusting, I call you narrow-minded and
prejudiced.  Poor Genuine Hardcheese.

>Karsten Hendrick, continuing to have delusions of granduer.

cws
From: krobinsn@osgiliath.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: OGGLE's Are FUCKING LAME!
Keywords: Jack plays with blocks
Date: 9 Apr 92 19:12:12 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.svHa-2m6
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <woDwiB3w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
>krobinsn@bree.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>
>> OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE      
>
>> K e n   R o b i n s o n         
>
>You sir, are in dire need of repair.

And you sir, are quite misinformed.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: cplma@groper.jcu.edu.au (Lynn Alford)
Subject: Re: Kebbin the Statistician
Organization: James Cook University
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 04:27:04 GMT

In <29e34090.crud@crud.mn.org> trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz) writes:

>In article <1992Apr4.175206.18513@rotag.mi.org>
>        flamestats@rotag.mi.org (Kebbin the Statistician) writes:

>]Actually Mr. Royce posted 114 articles and only 39 of them were 
>]responded-to.  That's a hit-ratio of 34.5%.  Which is still a
>]better hit-ratio then other ubiquitous posters like Barry Schwartz, 
>]John F. Woods & Chris Colby.

>Once again you make that error:  equating readership with writership.
>Ha!  Your sight is too narrow to be that of a true philosopher.  A
>philosopher, or any seeker of truth, must have wide vision and narrow
>scrutiny.  You have narrow vision and minute scrutiny.  You cannot see
>the forest for the crinkle in the bark of one tree, 3 mm above the
>ground and 1.2 radians east of north, which seems to be a mixture of
>forest green and burnt umber, and which no one else can find.

Love this paragraph, Barry.

>It matters not at all whether or not we get responses.  There are
>50000 readers and a handful of posters, and what matters is whether
>some good portion of the readers are entertained.  It happens that the

And, in at least one case Kevin was talking about, there is usually very
little to say.  I enjoy John Woods articles lots, but there is very
little that I could add to them.  He does manage some one line responses
that are the equivalent of a close range nuclear explosion.  A follow-up
could only lessen the effect.

>main reason I haven't gotten many responses lately is that most of my
>articles have been addressed to you, and you don't read my postings.

Well, you do seem to get a lot of your articles reposted for some odd
reason.  :-)

>However, usually I do not wait upon your response, or for you to read
>what I write.  I address you for rhetorical effect.  It is people who
>laugh at you who are the intended readers, and I believe they make up
>a good portion of all the readers of alt.flame.

Kevin gets lots of responses so he is under the misguided impression
that lots of responses are good.  Apparently it doesn't make any
difference to him that the responses are mainly articles pointing out
what an idiot he is.  He must have confused quantity with quality.

Lynn
T.S.A.K.C.
-- 
The screen of my Mac doesn't really resemble my desktop despite being designed 
to support the desktop metaphor (1), and the windows on my terminal bear only 
the slightest relation to the contraptions that lets drafts into my office.  
Stroustrup.  1) I wouldn't be able to tolerate such a mess on my screen anyway.
From: keegan@rosebud.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: His friend and nobody else's, Kevin Darcy!
Date: 16 Apr 92 21:36:14 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
-> >kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> >-> james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
-> >-> >kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes [to John Boy]:
-> >
-> >-> >-> Then, you attempted to support that statement by dredging
-> >-> >-> up an unrelated quote from over 3 months prior to the
-> >-> >-> thread in question. That not only compounded your lie, but
-> >-> >-> made you a "backpedaler" as well.
-> >-> >
-> >-> >no. it demonstrated that john researched his case and
-> >-> >presented his evidence. as it happens, his evidence was quite
-> >-> >strong.
-> >-> 
-> >-> THE ARTICLE HE PRODUCED IN "SUPPORT" OF HIS CLAIM *PREDATED*
-> >-> THE THREAD IN QUESTION BY MORE THAN 3 MONTHS. 
-> >
-> >so what. the articles he posted confirmed what he said and
-> >showed you to be lying. what's your problem with that? it
-> >happens to you all the time.

-> John Boy made a statement ....

john's statement, supported by posted evidence, proved that you
had lied, yet again. stop whining about it. you've simply been
exposed once more.

-> >-> By the way, don't you consider it a "conflict of interests" to
-> >-> be defending John Boy here?

-> >no one is defending john, kevin. john simply demonstrated
-> >that you don't mind making false accusations, but that you
-> >whine and cry when those false accusations are exposed.
-> >john's evidence was compelling and quite clear.

-> >simply stated, you got caught, again.
-> 
-> Uh, yeah, right. 

i'm glad you agree. then again, what choice did you have? after
all john supported his statements with facts.

        "Kevin, your own credibility may continue to decrease
        with longevity, but that's not the case for everyone."
		Jeff d'Arcy <jdarcy@encore.com> 
		<15249@encore.Encore.COM>


--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6515 alt.politics.homosexuality:1985
From: gborges@GeoWare.COM (George Borges)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 16:46:03 EDT
Organization: GeoWare Software Design, Toronto ON

fellers@utkvx2.utk.edu (Michael Fellers, University of Tennessee) writes:

>       Why don't you try to take me on?  I'm sure this could get quite
> interesting.  After all, I didn't get where I am now from being stupid.

No, you got there by sucking cock.

   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      George Borges, GeoWare Software Design - "World-class software!"
            ->  gborges@GeoWare.COM  | gborges@zohar.gts.org
            george.borges@canrem.com | 75376.1275@compuserve.com
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7086 alt.politics.homosexuality:2357 alt.sex:14975
From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 17 Apr 92 16:02:40 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <PP7DJB2w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM>
djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

>kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star) writes:

>> (I'm 6'4" like you, but my waist is only 32").

>Hehehe.... I'll just bet.. A skinny little twiggy..
>I'll bet my shoulders are wider then you can stretch your arms
>sweetie..

Nice try. So happens I wear a 44-LONG jacket. I've got pretty darn
strappin' shoulders.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.q