HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: yury@bknight.jpr.com (Yury German)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.internet,comp.org.eff.talk,rec.photo,misc.legal
Subject: Re:  Illegal photograph postings (was: Your police at work for you!)
Distribution: world
Date: 4 Apr 92 18:29:43 GMT
Organization: Blue-Knight Productions

In article <11478@tamsun.tamu.edu> sam9361@tamuts.tamu.edu (Shawn Adrian Mchorse) writes:
>What???  I'm having a problem following your line of (un)reasoning.  OK...
>the people who buy the magazines (and don't use the net) finance Playboy
>magazine.  However, most of the people who download scans of the pictures from
>the net don't buy the magazines, giving Playboy magazine no monetary
>compensation.  I believe it would probably be fair to say that if none of
>these pictures were posted to the net, more people would buy Playboy magazine.
	I strongly.... strongly doubt it. A coworker of mine gets all the
magazines for free and has a whole bunch of them because his finace
distributes the mags. The mags are nothink to him. But then he saw a
picture of a girl on the computer and went bonkers over it... he wants
more more more more. The computer pictures are more for novelty. If he
really wanted to get some mags he would... but the computer pictures are
just novelty. Now if Playboy decides to start a magazine via Disk thats a
different story then it would be different and the novelty would probably
wear off.

--
    _____________________________________________________________________
   |                                                                     |
   | Yury German                  yury@bknight or yury@bknight.jpr.com   |
   | Blue-Knight Productions      GENIE EMAIL: Blue-Knight               |
   | (212)218-1348                (Graphic Design and Video Productions) |
   | (718)321-0998		  P.O. Box 985, Queens, New York, 11354  |
   |_____________________________________________________________________|

Xref: sparky alt.bbs:3387 comp.org.eff.talk:3393 misc.legal:9049 rec.photo:6906
From: donl@glass.esd.sgi.com (donl mathis)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.org.eff.talk,misc.legal,rec.photo
Subject: Re: Illegal photograph postings (was: Your police
Date: 9 Apr 92 03:52:53 GMT
Reply-To: donl@glass.esd.sgi.com (donl mathis)
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA

This doesn't seem much like rec.photo material anymore, and yet it's
*still* the noisiest topic in the group.  Would you folks please
consider your cross-postings for appropriateness?

- donl mathis at Silicon Graphics Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA
donl@sgi.com
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.internet,comp.org.eff.talk,rec.photo,misc.legal
From: mpevans@isis.cs.du.edu (Mark Evans)
Subject: Re: Illegal photograph postings (was: Your police at work for you!)
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 12:26:35 GMT

kadie@herodotus.cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M. Kadie) writes:

>yury@bknight.jpr.com (Yury German) writes:

>[...]
>>	Just so all of you know and stop getting paranoid. Scanning and
>>using pictures is allowed as long as the picture is not duplicated
>>exactly. If the pictures is altered to certain degree then it becomes your
>>work.
>[...]

>I think you are half right and, therefore, all wrong.

>Your new work is a derivative of the previous work, so copying is
>still restricted.

Only clear cut case is where the photo has the copyright symbol followed
by the copyright holders name on the original publication.
If not it may have no copyright protection at all, in quite a few parts 
of the world.
Assuming it does, then only deliberate modifications can cause it to become
a derived (possibly defined as new in some countries) work.
Consider if you photocopy something on a faulty photocopier, which leaves
smudges and lines all over the place, you still have to abide by copyright
usually that you are doing so for private usage, review (source material for
your own project is a subsection of private usage)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.internet,comp.org.eff.talk,rec.photo,misc.legal
From: mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin)
Subject: Re: Illegal photograph postings (was: Your police at work for you!)
Originator: mnemonic@eff.org
Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1992 00:36:39 GMT

In article <08B8HB5w164w@underg.UUCP> max@underg.UUCP (Max Cray) writes:

>I vote *NO* to the concept of copyrights.

What is your alternative proposal to provide for the payment of novelists
and painters, then?


--Mike



-- 
Mike Godwin,     |"Les vrais paradis sont les paradis
mnemonic@eff.org | qu'on a perdus."
(617) 864-0665   | 
EFF, Cambridge   |          --Marcel Proust
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.internet
From: tinsel@uiuc.edu (Thomas Aaron Insel)
Subject: Re: Illegal photographs and Prodigy
Originator: tai50080@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
Reply-To: tinsel@uiuc.edu
Organization: {not speaking for the} University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 17:45:42 GMT

rdale@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Robert Dale) writes:

>Several posts have been made asking the people posting replies to
>keep alt.bbs.internet off of the distribution but this morning I wake
>up to half-a-dozen posts on photos and a few access requests.
>I guess now the point for action comes in.

>RFD: All posts about photos, police and Prodigy's policies after
>today (4/7) are replied to with a few megabytes of useless data, 
>hopefully filling up the poster's mailboxes endlessly.
>That should solve the problem.

I sympathize, but please just use a kill-file to ignore what you don't
want to read.  There's been far too much of this kind of bombing lately.
Anti-social behavior is far from the best response to other (perceived)
anti-social behavior.  






















-- 
Thomas Aaron Insel (tinsel@uiuc.edu)
  I speak for myself, and not for the State or University of Illinois.
  "We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty." -- Edward R. Murrow
Xref: sparky alt.bbs:3473 alt.bbs.internet:2340 comp.org.eff.talk:3449
From: hydeed@mwk.uucp
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.internet,comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re:  Illegal photograph postings (was: Your police at work for you!)
Date: 14 Apr 92 14:56:09 CST
Distribution: world
Organization: M. W. Kellogg, Houston TX

In article <yury.08no@bknight.jpr.com>, yury@bknight.jpr.com (Yury German) writes:
> In article <11478@tamsun.tamu.edu> sam9361@tamuts.tamu.edu (Shawn Adrian Mchorse) writes:
>>What???  I'm having a problem following your line of (un)reasoning.  OK...
>>the people who buy the magazines (and don't use the net) finance Playboy
>>magazine.  However, most of the people who download scans of the pictures from
>>the net don't buy the magazines, giving Playboy magazine no monetary
>>compensation.  I believe it would probably be fair to say that if none of
>>these pictures were posted to the net, more people would buy Playboy magazine.


> I strongly.... strongly doubt it. A coworker of mine gets all the
> magazines for free and has a whole bunch of them because his finace
> distributes the mags. The mags are nothink to him. But then he saw a
> picture of a girl on the computer and went bonkers over it... he wants
> more more more more. The computer pictures are more for novelty. If he
> really wanted to get some mags he would... but the computer pictures are
> just novelty. Now if Playboy decides to start a magazine via Disk thats a
> different story then it would be different and the novelty would probably
> wear off.
> 

Who really truly _cares_ if Playboy is properly compensated for the use of their
own pictures?  Do YOU work for Playboy?  Illegal or not, why is it such a 
concern?  If you post copyrighted material, then you should be prepared to 
suffer consequences if your caught.  Besides, Penthouse is much better.



P.
hydeed@mwk.uucp
From: phygod72@nic.gac.edu (Phil )
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: Jester the pure
Date: 13 Apr 92 23:59:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr13.175957.851

In article <45164@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>  writes:
} }}>Jester is an amazingly purre 94.4% well, at least he was last month
} }}Just like Ivory soap....  My hero, my love, the only one for me--didn't  
} }}know a person could get so attached to a bar of soap, did ya?
} }No, no, no! He'd be 99.44% pure if he were a bar of Ivory! And Robyn, did 
} }you pick him up bending down in the shower after P.E.?
} 
} what I object tooo is that you automatically treat me like a bar of soap
} when you know that I am just as dirty as the rest of you, haven't you
} seen my legs, orr the scum behind my ears or the belly-button lint that
} became self-aware yesterday??????
} 
} }}>]Phil aka my mind is a blank
} }}>Jester aka my mind is in the gutter
} }}Robyn @#& my mind is in the shower.  Pass me my towel.
} Jester aka no, I want to see you naked...
Phil aka I've got a picture of her, too!  Wanna see?
From: djohnson@cayenne.gac.edu (Daniel P Johnson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: aka?
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:48:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: cayenne.DJOHNSON.92Apr15124823
 02953339@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au><45390@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Organization: Fallen Prey to Entropy
In-reply-to: jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu's message of 14 Apr 92 19:37:01 GMTLines: 20

In article <45390@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes:
.}>.]>>}>|>>>>}}>-enrique aka juggler
.}>.]>>}>|>>>>}}Eccles aka What?
.}>.]>>}>|>>>>}Phil aka this is how this whole long aka starts...
.}>.]>>}>|>>>>Jester aka it is?????
.}>.]>>}>|>>>Tia aka it is!!!!!!!!!!!
.}>.]>>}>|>>MSNOI!! aka I refuse to add to this list. (oh, shit!)
.}>.]>>}>|>Tia aka silly boy, you just did (giggle  ;) )!!
.}>.]>>}>|Dougger aka So What??
.}>.]>>}>Jos aka Probably Cause He Ain't Got No List-Adding-Aka License! *Laarg*!
.}>.]>>}Tia aka then why did he add to *our* aka list?  *auphf!*
.}>.]>>Jester aka cuuz he is a stupid git, a festering gob, a .....
.}>.]>Tia aka well get rid of him, then!
.}>.]Eccles aka Why not just make him hang upside down over a steaming pit of Christian Scientists?
.}>.Jester aka my grandmother would do nicely, she's a christian scientist
.}>Dan aka Hey, don't complain.  Thats better than a christened scientologist
.}Eccles aka Only fractionally. Yes only by the green bits on a Mandelbrot
.Jester aka math, chaos, what does this have to do with broiled religion?
Dan aka Well, there was this butterfly in Brazil, you see, and it
flapped its wings and [blam blam]
From: morjens@vipunen.hut.fi (Jens B von Weissenberg)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: An apology, dammit!
Date: 14 Apr 92 07:49:38 GMT
Distribution: alt.fan.monthy-python
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland


Hm. 

Well, yes, yes, now, that is nothing to worry about, that's what we doctors
call a virus.

Now to the point. I seemed to have appeared somewhat stupid in my response to
DeAnn's mail about the nude Brian, and I now have found out that DeAnn is
not, and never was, prude, and I regrett anything I said on this topic.

This has been a broadcast by the totally netral BBC, operatring on behalv
of the conservative party.

Morjens aka I still think DeAnn's first mail on the subject sounded silly.
From: ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (T.F. Eccles)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: Briag Charachters
Date: 5 Apr 92 02:15:55 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.

ICDJK@ASUACAD.BITNET writes:

>Now, I have to admit that I recently bought the tape.  I've never seen the
>movie before.  But I love MP, and bought the movie any way.  The scene where
>Brian opens the sutters and bares himself to the world was quite shocking.
>I've never seen full frontly nudity of a man before (in the movies).  My
>daughter (who is only 12) got quite an eye full.  I remember telling her

>there you go, now you've seen them all.

>Well that's whaddya think.

>DeAnn aka Can I say that this is my post? (and yes I'm a legal aka user)
Welcome to the fold. Hang on. You've got a daughter whose twelve. There you
go Ron, another oldy. We have another poster over the age of 25.

Eccles aka Greetings and I agree.
From: jos@and.nl (Jos Horsmeier)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: Marrage
Date: 8 Apr 92 12:23:40 GMT
Organization: AND Software BV Rotterdam

In article <44265@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes:
|robynn1@cascabel.gac.edu (Robyn Ness) writes:
|}In article <1992Apr6.101704.651@gacvx2.gac.edu>  writes:
|}>Well lets see we can go to england for our honeymoon and see where they  
|}>filmed the monty python films.  ammm a day well how about the 3rd day of  
|}>the 3rd month.  Ring I think a nice small ring with no adornments would  
|}>do.  whatever you want will do.  Hey I am not picky it can be even made   
|}>out of gum wrappers for all I care.  It is the symbolism that is  
|}>important.
|
|right swamp castle is a lovely holiday location....hmm, so we get married 
|next march 3rd, i can handle that. ring, ring, i am still looking for a
|ring around my collar, or maybe a bathtub scum ring.........
|
|}Can I be a bride's maid????  Please, can I???????  I promise not to wear  
|}my Big Bird suit...and I'll try really hard not to scoff at true <trying  
|}to recover from nausious feeling> love.  I'll even bring the cake...How  
|}about a scale-model sized rendition of "Killer Bunny"?  I even promise not  
|}to buy you a toaster, unless it is one of those 10-12 slice ones...   
|}Pleassssseeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|well, why not, thats makes Jos the Bishop who will marry us, Robyn
|is the bride's maid. We still need a best man, and ringbears, who knew
|an internet wedding could be so expensive and time-consuming...

Well, since I'm gonna be the bishop then, am I allowed to wear high heels then?
A halibut fur bra mayhap? *GORN*! My Great Mogul suspendies? ehh? yes? yes?

Jos aka Looking Forward To The Wedding! Ta da ta daaa!
From: mullignj@acfcluster.nyu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: What's Gilliam's connection?
Date: 7 Apr 92 18:03:59 GMT
Organization: New York University


On the ads to the new movie Delicatessan there is a little blurb
which says, "Brought to you by Terry Gilliam".  Does anyone know
what kind of involvement he had with this film?

"Remember, we're all in this together!" 
DeNiro in Gilliam's BRAZIL
From: ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (T.F. Eccles)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: aka?
Date: 11 Apr 92 01:28:38 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.

jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes:

>].}>>>}}>-enrique aka juggler
>].}>>>}}Eccles aka What?
>].}>>>}Phil aka this is how this whole long aka starts...
>].}>>>Jester aka it is?????
>].}>>Tia aka it is!!!!!!!!!!!
>].}>Eccles aka Are you sure?
>].}Tia aka yea, I'm sure.
>].Jester aka I'm not so sure
>]Dan aka Why do 'Here here!' and 'There there.' mean something, whereas
>]'Where where?' does not?  (sorry..I was going to say something else,
>]but that came to mind.)
>Jester aka look you've spoiled the whole mood, we'll have to start again

>Jester aka how long is it?
Eccles aka how long is what?
From: azeena@hotspur.gac.edu (Jennifer Landry)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: aka? (Yes! Definitely!)
Date: 15 Apr 92 16:08:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr15.100833.945

In article <1992Apr14.192857.921@gacvx2.gac.edu>  writes:
> In article <1992Apr14.121545.892@gacvx2.gac.edu>  writes:
> > In article <45346@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>  writes:
> > > }|> }|.|]|]>|}}}>-enrique aka juggler
> > > }|> }|.|]|]>|}}}Eccles aka What?
> > > }|> }|.|]|]>|}}Phil aka this is how this whole long aka starts...
> > > }|> }|.|]|]>|}Jester aka it is?????
> > > }|> }|.|]|]>|Phil aka just ask the horse!!!
> > > }|> }|.|]|]>Jos aka Did Anyone Call Me?
> > > }|> }|.|]|]Eccles aka NO.
> > > }|> }|.|]|Jester aka why not, jos is my hero
> > > }|> }|.|]Jos aka Yes! And I'm Wearing Two TuTus, 'Cause I Am Two  
> Ballet  
> > > }|Dancers Too!
> > > }|> }|.|Jester aka Jos is two mints in one!!!
> > > }|> }|.Jos aka *Blush* ... You're Too Kind, Sweetie Pie ...
> > > }|> }|Dan aka Come to think it, I always that double fresh feeling  
> when  
> > I
> > > }|> }|respond to him.
> > > }|> }Jos aka Yeah! Said Thing Is, He's Marrying Someone Else, I  
Think  
> > I'm In 
> > > }|> }	Love With His Wisdom-Teeth!
> > > }|> Jester aka I can marry who I want, and I want all of you!!!!!!!
> > > }|azeena @!$ well I don't want you anymore!!! 
> > > }Jos aka But ... But ... Does That Mean The Wedding's Off Then?  
*sob* 
> > > Jester aka yes, it is
> > azeena @$! Damn right it is
> > > }ps. You should get yourself an aka license, this `@!$' thingie  
looks  
> > horrible!
> > > pps just mail me you harlot
> > PPPs look whose talking!! 
> Robyn @#& "Mr. Jester, male prostitute"?
azeena @#! don't ask if you don't want to know!
--
@>-->----- (rose)
azeena@nic.gac.edu
azeena@gacvx1.gac.edu
From: jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: brides maid
Date: 15 Apr 92 15:13:25 GMT
Article-I.D.: mentor.45530
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

}> } }>]>Jester aka yeesh........
}> } }>]Robyn @#& squish........ 
}> } }>Jester aka still in diapers
}> } }azeena @!$ Yep i can attest to that!!
}> } Jester aka you've never even met me.
}Robyn @#& Is that an invitation to come for a visit?  Oh, Mr. Jester,  
}you're soooo generous...
Jester aka your gonna come to Kalamazoo, Michigan?? I had better hide...
-- 
 .sig on strike until further notice due to union complaints......
From: ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (T.F. Eccles)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: Philosopher Song - DEFINITIVE!
Date: 11 Apr 92 00:31:15 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.

shinosjr@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (John R Shinoskie) writes:

>I just bought Monty Python Sings.  GREAT!  Anyway, you just about have it  
>there by the enclosed lyric sheets.  However, in the Hollywood Bowl, I  
>thought "David Hume could outconsume Schoppenhauer and Hegel."  Is that  
>reliable enough?
>	
>	Schnozz
Yeah, there's always been two versions at least.
Eccles aka Hello.
From: jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: Jester the pure
Date: 14 Apr 92 15:33:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: mentor.45354
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

}>>>}}>]Phil aka my mind is a blank
}>>>}}>Jester aka my mind is in the gutter
}>>>}}Robyn @#& my mind is in the shower.  Pass me my towel.
}>>>Jester aka no, I want to see you naked...
}>>Robyn @#& I want to see your bankbook...
}>azeena @#! yea! 
}Sue aka You two can have the bankbook, I want his credit cards!
Jester aka i don't have any credit cards
-- 
 .sig on strike until further notice due to union complaints......
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: aka?
From: robynn1@hotspur.gac.edu (Robyn Ness)
Date: 14 Apr 92 19:14:59 -0600

In article <45394@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>  writes:
> }>>]|>|}>|>>>>}}>-enrique aka juggler
> }>>]|>|}>|>>>>}}Eccles aka What?
> }>>]|>|}>|>>>>}Phil aka this is how this whole long aka starts...
> }>>]|>|}>|>>>>Jester aka it is?????
> }>>]|>|}>|>>>Tia aka it is!!!!!!!!!!!
> }>>]|>|}>|>>MSNOI!! aka I refuse to add to this list. (oh, shit!)
> }>>]|>|}>|>Tia aka silly boy, you just did (giggle  ;) )!!
> }>>]|>|}>|Dougger aka So What??
> }>>]|>|}>Jos aka Probably Cause He Ain't Got No List-Adding-Aka License!  
*Laarg*!
> }>>]|>|}Phil aka not the other Phil!
> }>>]|>|Jester aka this looks like fun
> }>>]|>Jos aka Yes It Does, But Do We Allow Non-Aka-Members To  
Participate?
> }>>]|Tia aka no, cos they may be members of the bogus Nnne!
> }>>]Jos aka AAaarghHh! No! Not The Members Of The Nnnnne Gang! Help!  
Help! Help!
> }>>Jester aka does nne stand for nefarious nellie eaters????
> }>Tia aka LEAVE *MY* NELLIE OUTTA THIS OR *HE'LL* EAT *YOU* AND THE  
THREAD!!!!!!
> }>(he's my fluffy pet navel-orfficer so  
there......ppphhhhhffffttttttt!!!!!!
> }Eccles aka QUICK QUICK throw a sink full of cold water on her!!!!!!!
> Jester aka no, no, no, I am having sex with the sink, get away....
Robyn @#& Is this sink porcelain or stainless steel?
From: ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (T.F. Eccles)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: Briag Charachters
Date: 14 Apr 92 00:32:08 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.

ICDJK@ASUACAD.BITNET writes:

>>Oh, my dear DeAnn, you americans are such a fussy lot! Is nudity something
>>that can hurt you? Does one, by watching a nude man, get mentally disordered?
>>Is a nude person ugly? I didn't see anything shocking in a full frontal view
>>of the nude Brian, and I honestly can't see what anybody could find shocking
>>about it. He didn't do any obscene gestures, he didn't have an erection, it
>>was just a plain, natural, nude man. Your moral over there sometimes, or
>>actually most of the time really makes me wonder how you even reproduce.

>>Morjens aka oh you silly, silly people!

>I guess shocking was the wrong word for what I meant to say.  Unexpected
>would be the right word.  I wasn't offened--I thought it was quite funny.
>Both my daughter and I laughed.  And your right about most of the Americans
>view on nudity.  How one reproduces here is quite simple, IN-OUT repeat if
>necessary.

>DeAnn aka knows how to reproduce.

Tee hee. Very nice. I'd guess with a daughter already, you'd at least have
some ideas. Where is you at the moment anyway? Well, I don't mean right at the 
moment, but in a sort of genral locational query, I'd would probably enjoy quit
much knowing the average locus of your presence.

Eccles aka I'm turning into a public servant.
From: jos@and.nl (Jos Horsmeier)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: aka?
Date: 6 Apr 92 13:59:06 GMT
Organization: AND Software BV Rotterdam

In article <DJOHNSON.92Apr5194327@cayenne.gac.edu> djohnson@cayenne.gac.edu (Daniel P Johnson) writes:
|In article <2518@dozo.and.nl> jos@and.nl (Jos Horsmeier) writes:
|.In article <ins450m.702113820@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au> ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (T.F. Eccles) writes:
|.|v128juxa@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Schuyjuannah) writes:
|.|
|.|>In article <43022@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes...
|.|>>}>|>>>>}}>-enrique aka juggler
|.|>>}>|>>>>}}Eccles aka What?
|.|>>}>|>>>>}Phil aka this is how this whole long aka starts...
|.|>>}>|>>>>Jester aka it is?????
|.|>>}>|>>>Tia aka it is!!!!!!!!!!!
|.|>>}>|>>MSNOI!! aka I refuse to add to this list. (oh, shit!)
|.|>>}>|>Tia aka silly boy, you just did (giggle  ;) )!!
|.|>>}>|Dougger aka So What??
|.|>>}>Jos aka Probably Cause He Ain't Got No List-Adding-Aka License! *Laarg*!
|.|>>}Tia aka then why did he add to *our* aka list?  *auphf!*
|.|>>Jester aka cuuz he is a stupid git, a festering gob, a .....
|.|>Tia aka well get rid of him, then!
|.|Eccles aka Why not just make him hang upside down over a steaming pit of Christian Scientists?
|.Jos aka Yes! Yes! Yes! And We'll Force Them To Eat The Scientists AfterWard! Raw!
|Dan aka Yes!  With Freshly Ground Pepper and a Sage-Dressing!
Jos aka Hmmmm ... Sounds Wonderful! And A Drip Of Tobasco Sauce! Just A
	Drip, And ... <thud> (dammit ...here feet! come here! I ... AaargHH!!)
From: ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (T.F. Eccles)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: aka?
Date: 5 Apr 92 01:45:00 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.

jos@and.nl (Jos Horsmeier) writes:

>In article <1992Mar30.175719.14014@acsu.buffalo.edu> v128juxa@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Schuyjuannah) writes:
>|In article <43022@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes...
>|>}>|>>>>}}>-enrique aka juggler
>|>}>|>>>>}}Eccles aka What?
>|>}>|>>>>}Phil aka this is how this whole long aka starts...
>|>}>|>>>>Jester aka it is?????
>|>}>|>>>Tia aka it is!!!!!!!!!!!
>|>}>|>>MSNOI!! aka I refuse to add to this list. (oh, shit!)
>|>}>|>Tia aka silly boy, you just did (giggle  ;) )!!
>|>}>|Dougger aka So What??
>|>}>Jos aka Probably Cause He Ain't Got No List-Adding-Aka License! *Laarg*!
>|>}Tia aka then why did he add to *our* aka list?  *auphf!*
>|>Jester aka cuuz he is a stupid git, a festering gob, a .....
>|Tia aka well get rid of him, then!
>Jos aka Maybe We Could Cook Him ...
Eccles aka What's this fetish Jos has with human flesh? Maybe he should go to