HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: klein@frith.egr.msu.edu (Jeffrey Klein)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Pronunciation of Fabian Nicieza
Date: 30 Sep 92 18:50:43 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University College of Stunt Piloting

In article <20823@plains.NoDak.edu> dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu (David Henry) writes:
>In article <1abgn4INN2dc@vulcan.ksu.ksu.edu> lazarus@vulcan.ksu.ksu.edu writes:
>>
>>In article <Sep.28.21.27.15.1992.12470@dorm.rutgers.edu>, jgreene@dorm.rutgers.edu (Jeffrey Greene) writes:
>>>How to pronounce "Nicieza": nee-see-eh-sa
>>
>>Okay... now say Sienkiewicz!  >:)
>
>Shen-kah-witz

Sin-KEV-ich

-- 
Jeff Klein             | "Happily, Ral doffs his outer clothing for a
Browsing Boy of the LNH|  refreshing dip in one of the dangerous 
klein@frith.egr.msu.edu|  chemical vats." - Ty Templeton 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: Re: Maddrox
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 04:09:31 GMT

In article <1992Sep25.124728.14350@abo.fi> MHANNINEN@finabo.abo.fi (Mika H{nninen Inf) writes:
>In <66568@cup.portal.com> Peter_A_David@cup.portal.com writes:
>
>>                            ~           --Lyla, the holographic      ~
>>                            ~             computer image.            ~
>>                            ~             "Spider-Man 2099 #4"       ~
>                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>AAARRGGHHH!! I haven't even got #1 yet (due to an european distributor screwing
>up) and now he goes and start's quoting #4!  I hate this man :)
>
>				-Mika
>
Hell, he was posting the Cable/Disney Channel joke that was in this latest
issue of X-Factor, last Spring.  Still, I laughed each time I read it, and
got a warm fuzzy when I saw it in the book.

----SCAVENGER


-- 
KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai
From: pstrem@the-sap-pitt.East.Sun.COM (Paul Strem)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Info on Psylocke...?
Date: 30 Sep 92 14:30:05 GMT
Reply-To: pstrem@the-sap-pitt.East.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: the-sap-pitt.east.sun.com

In article 19sj7qINN2n6@male.EBay.Sun.COM, thor@eb5ts4.EBay.Sun.COM (Vaughn Rhoades) writes:
> 	Psylocke...so could someone please e-mail me the "Psylocke File"...
							^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

				"Psylocke File"????  What is this?
		I've seen the Rogue file.  Is their one of these for 
		Gambit?  Other X-Men?



					    ^
				The Flea   / \^.
					  ^


		{the opinions above are probably NOT those of
 			anyone at all, even my own.}
From: lazarus@maico.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: RE: The Jamie/Siryn thing
Date: 2 Oct 1992 03:32:30 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: maico.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <30SEP92.21128598.0091@VM1.MCGILL.CA>, CXMP@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA (CXMP) writes:
>I suppose this brings up an interesting question: how much does Jamie
>remember what happened to his dupes when he reassembles himself?  I
>mean, even if a dupe manages to assert a distinct personality, that
>personality must disappear or at least it would exist
>only subconsciously.  If Jamie were to experience his
>dupe's memories in a flash as if they were a dream, how certain can
>he be of what really happened?  I think that might be the kind of
>question Jamie was supposed to have been asking himself at the end of
>X-Force #16.

Well, seeing as under normal circumstances all of the Jamies are linked
telepathically, they all know the same thing at the same time, so when
they regroup into ONE Madrox, it's no great shock.

Now, assuming that the "rogue" Madrox WASN'T linked to the "real" one,
I'd think that Jamie has all the memories of BOTH of them, and that they
tend to jumble in places.  So, Jamie could quite literally have "mixed
feelings" for Siryn...

(I'm still a firm believer in the theory that there's no "real" Jamie...)

>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                ! Address as above or use
>Martin Phipps                   ! LOULA@hep.physics.mcgill.ca or simply
>                                ! MUHEP::LOULA if you're on a VAX
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Terminal freeze, duplicate posts, lost posts and email-come-posts,
>these are a few of my least favorite things.

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
'Cats - 35, Temple - 14... a MUCH more satisfying win!  :)
"Think about it... after you spend a day in a society whose prevailing
	philosophy is 'Why make small problems when you can create a holocaust,'
	then you must navigate your way home with a society who maintains the
	same philosophy in their driving..." 
				-- "Frank's Chair" -- 2nu -- Ponderous
From: lazarus@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Magik (Re: post)
Date: 6 Oct 1992 02:37:26 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: venture.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <1992Oct2.221107.7297@iscsvax.uni.edu>, boehmer9694@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:
>Then how do you explain the amulet?

Did the amulet appear at the end of Infernal with the younger Illyana?  (It's
been a LONG time since I read that fiasco...)  If so, I'd lay odds that there
were NO bloodstones laid into the pentagram within...

> (by the way, I have both heard and created multiple workable theorys. I posted
>my personal favorite but would love to hear others!)
>                                      " Be what you are. "
>                                          R.J. Boehmer

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
'Cats - 19, New Mexico State - 0. Good defense.  Next stop, guess who?  KU. >;)
"Why should we get kicked for $125,000 when we could get kicked for $300,000?"
	-- Jim Hess, NMSU head football coach on not being able to get out of 
	   it's scheduled game(s) against Kansas State University.  ("What? A
	   KSU foe tried to get out of the game!", Wichita Eagle, October 1,
	   1992)
"Guess what?  George just got picked off... The inning is over, but who cares?
	George Brett got base hit No. 3,000, no runs, one hit, nobody left.  We
	go to the bottom of the seventh, the Royals 3, Angels 0, George 3,000."
	-- Fred White, calling the play after... well, it's kinda obvious... 
	   on Wednesday, September 30, 1992.  ("Announcer White had to put
	   milestone call on hold", Kansas City Star, October 2, 1992)

Congratulations, George.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: jdb1145@summa.tamu.edu (And This Is What the Devil Does....)
Subject: Re: X-Cutioner's Song- A horrible thought
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 19:08:00 GMT

In article <92268.161504EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu>, Ernie Oporto <EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu> writes...
>In article <18501.2ac0bc4c@ecs.umass.edu>, masulliv@ecs.umass.edu (Michael

>No, I believe from what I've heard about this week's X-Force, that X-Force
>all 2 people left conscious in the team, give themselves up to the X-men
>at the end of the issue.  And since Shatterstar is no longer among the
>living, I find it doubtful that they'll be winning any battles soon.


Guys, Shatterstar is *not* dead.  You're basing his "death" on the fact that 
Wolverine stuck his claws into and through Shatterstar's gut.  This is the same
Shatterstar who, in New Mutants #99, shoved HIS OWN SWORD through HIS OWN BODY
to kill the guy holding him from behind.  I severely doubt he's dead, but I
will bet money that he won't be running the four minute mile anytime soon.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John D. Burke, Texas A&M University | "And your city lies in dust my friend." 
JDB1145@tamu.edu                    | -Siouxsie and the Banshees
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Eerywhere I look, all I see,       | "Hot tears flow as she recounts
Just a fading, fucking reminder of  | A favorite worded token,
Who I used to be."		    | 'Forgive me please for hurting so,
				    | Don't go away heart broken, no'"
	-Nine Inch Nails	    |	 -Peter Murphy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: marcsch@microsoft.com (Marc Schermerhorn)
Subject: Re: Pronunciation of Fabian Nicieza
Date: 30 Sep 92 14:12:55 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.


  I have a question about Magneto. I've been reading and collecting Marvel and especially X-men since the age of 10 or so, and Magneto has ALWAYS been my favorite character. Since I'm new to this system, and never had the opportunity to read the posts around the time Magneto "died", what do you all think?? I've been arguing with friends since X-Men 3 came out that "NAWWW, Marvel never keeps anyone dead, especially someone like Magneto---that'd be like killing Doctor Doom and finding out 3 issues later that


(And I still agree that Aunt May has the last infinity gem)







Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: robi@bacchus.esa.oz.au (Robi Karp)
Subject: Re: The "NEW" New Mutants!
Reply-To: robi@bacchus.esa.oz.au
Organization: Expert Solutions Australia
	<ROBI.92Oct6121818@raven.bacchus.esa.oz.au>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 02:21:52 GMT

In article <ROBI.92Oct6121818@raven.bacchus.esa.oz.au>
robi@bacchus.esa.oz.au (Robi Karp) writes:

: Yeh, then each team can be introduced with a 4 issue miniseries
: followed by a permanent title, of course each would have 50 number
: ones each with 3D holo-laser-steroid-gram covers and whenever we have
: those crossovers, every 2 months, we can now look forward to crossing
: into not 2, not 3 not 4 not 5 .... but 700 different titles. Wow, I
: just can't wait for all the action to start !

Just to add to what I've already said; Why bother to develop on feeble
existing characters which _obviously_ are going nowhere, when you can
invent millions of new exciting ones :-)

	- Robi
--
INTERNET: robi@bacchus.esa.oz.au     "But Calvin is no kind and loving god!
ACSnet  : robi@bacchus.esa.oz         He's one of the _old_ gods! He demands
Tel     : (+61) (3) 819 4554          sacrifice!"
Fax     : (+61) (3) 819 5580
From: lazarus@vulcan.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Mutant Review -- X-Force #16 (Spoilers, probably)
Date: 28 Sep 1992 01:25:25 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: vulcan.ksu.ksu.edu
Keywords: X-Cutioner's Song, Part 4


X-Force #16 (X-Cutioner's Song, Part 4)
Story: Fabian Nicieza
Art: Greg Capullo, Harry Candelario - Capullo did a good job of rendering
        our mutant heroes here... he'll make a good regular on X-Force!
        (He started out pencilling the New Warriors, if I remember correctly.
        Not that I READ that book... )  It looks like the Liefeld days of
        pouts and shit-eating grins are long gone.  :)  There's not much I
        can say about Candelario... I know the name, but no significant
        titles or issues come to mind...

Spoilers follow...














Nicieza actually held with continuity AND Shatterstar's personality
development, where his patter with Wolverine was concerned.  It's too bad
'Star's dead.  Or IS he?  >:)

Siryn vs. Madrox: anyone who's kept up with X-Factor knows WHY Jamie
claimed to not know anything of the Fallen Angels, but when he reabsorbed
the "evil" Jamie, didn't he GET those memories?  Besides, the two of them
had been on Muir Isle LONG before the Fallen Angels existed...

Hmm... somebody was nitpicking the use of the word "the" in the phrase
"-- the X-Men's Blackbird craf silently touches down --"... what was
the gripe?

Mr. Sinister vs. Bishop: I'd fogotten how tough Sinister really was.
(Remember, only Cyke's power can affect him!)  Sinister WANTS Xavier to
survive?  He definitely has some sort of hate going for Apocalypse!  And
yes, Sinister already knew Valerie Cooper... from the issues of X-Factor
in which he approached her.  (No danglers here...)

"'Father' -- 'Mother'"... of Stryfe?  SLIGHT possibility (even now, in the
face of so much "evidence", I STILL don't want to admit the Nathan=Cable=
Stryfe theory!).  Of a mutant revolution?  That would seem a little more
likely... and would be something that Stryfe might want to prevent...

Okay.  Sunspot fired off a volley with his power.  I was wrong.  Heh.  <:)

Anyway, I don't THINK there were any other bits...

Next: This time I'm SURE it'll be Cable #2!

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
'Cats - 27, Montana - 12... Temple's turn is this Saturday!
"Think about it... after you spend a day in a society whose prevailing
	philosophy is 'Why make small problems when you can create a holocaust,'
	then you must navigate your way home with a society who maintains the
	same philosophy in their driving..." 
				-- "Frank's Chair" -- 2nu -- Ponderous
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Stryfe calls Scott and Jean "father" and "mother"!
From: sweide@uceng.UC.EDU (Steven Weide)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:37:02 GMT
Organization: University of Cincinnati, Engineering College

Just a little comment on the "mother" and "father" issue.  If you take
Stryfe's comments in context with the rest of the sentence, he could mean
something different.  He is saying something about Jean and Scott 
somehow creating the future (I can't remember exactly) so he could mean
"mother" and "father" in the sense of whatever he was talking about, not
his own mother and father.  Just a little thought that they can use that
if they want to change all their clues and have Stryfe not related to
Jean and Scott (but they wouldn't do that now, would they?)  :-)
                                                       Steve
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Maddrox
Date: 29 Sep 92 04:53:59 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Sep29.040931.7968@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER) writes:
>In article <1992Sep25.124728.14350@abo.fi> MHANNINEN@finabo.abo.fi (Mika H{nninen Inf) writes:
>>In <66568@cup.portal.com> Peter_A_David@cup.portal.com writes:
>>
>>>                            ~           --Lyla, the holographic      ~
>>>                            ~             computer image.            ~
>>>                            ~             "Spider-Man 2099 #4"       ~
>>                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>AAARRGGHHH!! I haven't even got #1 yet (due to an european distributor screwing
>>up) and now he goes and start's quoting #4!  I hate this man :)
>>
>>				-Mika
>>
>Hell, he was posting the Cable/Disney Channel joke that was in this latest
>issue of X-Factor, last Spring.  Still, I laughed each time I read it, and
>got a warm fuzzy when I saw it in the book.

And before THAT was "Rahne's World."  PAD just gave me one MORE reason
to look forward to that issue.  Previewing his jokes doesn't bother 
me in the least.

-- 
"Dog bites man--that's not a story.  Man bites dog--*that's* a story.  And
if the dog and the man slug it out for six issues, and then Wolverine shows
up for a guest appearance, and the dog turns out to be a mutant, that's a
*Marvel* story!"			-Marvel Editorial Handbook
From: v083lmh8@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Fred @ UB)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Uplink (was THE CLAREMONT FILES)
Date: 5 Oct 92 18:07:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Sep24.054806.9945@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>, kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER) writes...
>WoAh there!!!  Since I posted the files, I figure I can stick my nose into this!
>I think the story ideas are interesting, some good, some bad but all in all
>neat.
> 
>As to Mr. Uplink,  I did not post this so that you could rant and flame a friend
>of mine.  Drizzt may not have the same opinions as you (or me for that matter), but that doesn't mean that you have the right to insult him.  As far as I'm 
>concerned he has as much, if not more right to post here than you, concidering
>that HE doesn't go around insulting people!
> 
>As for writing ability, just because someone is a profesional, does not mean
>that they are good.  Look at Lobdell, Liefield, or Larsen.  Hell, even PAD write
>s shit from time to time (sorry PAD, but I just didn't care for Psi-Man 6).And
>Claremont wrote some real garbage durring his time with the X-Men (did 
>somebody say Brood Boys?).  Plus, as a LNH writer, Drizzt, has shown that he
>can write an entertaining story, managing many charaters at once.  I rather
>see him on some books then your so called pros.
> 
>If you disagree with someone say so then explain why.  Personal attacks
>will not be tolerated!  (didn't we go thru this last year with PAD?)
>
ANYBODY SAY ANYTHING AGAINST DRIZZT?!?!  I'LL KILL'EM!! LEMME AT'EM!!  GRRR!!
Really, I agree with SCAV.  If you don't have anything non-insulting to write,
well then keep your comments to yourself.  We're not the Morton Downey Jr show.
We're hear to express our dislike or praise for the stories we share in common.
This is a forum of opinions, not an insult forum.  Hopefully, this won't happen
again.  Remember, aim your anger at those 'higher-ups' (lowdown m***** f******)
in Marvel.

							The Man(A Loyal Fan)


>-----SCAVENGER generally pissed off
> 
>-- 
>KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
>           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
>CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
>     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai 

Keep the Faith readers of the 'Children of the Atom'!
					-Fred @ UB
From: barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Sinister
Date: 6 Oct 92 10:52:19 CDT
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <Oct.6.09.09.10.1992.25128@dorm.rutgers.edu>, jgreene@dorm.rutgers.edu (Jeffrey Greene) writes:
> foregone@stein.u.washington.edu (Ah so Grasshopper!) writes:
> 
>>In article <tmunson.718297700@cwis> tmunson@cwis.unomaha.edu (todd s. munson) writes:
>>>Anyway, what did Mr. Sinister recieve in the little container?  Could he have
>>>recieved the remains of Doug Ramsey and Warlock?  I wouldn't put it past him
>>>since a) he hates Prof. X and b) Warlock and Doug are the only ones that have
>>>the means (supposedly) to cure the techno-virus.  Finally, Mr. Sinister can
>>>clone live tissue (he did so with Madelyn Pryor), can he also clone dead 
>>>tissue (hence the 'creation' of Douglock)?

Three problems with this otherwise likable theory:
  1) Sinister _got_ the thing from Stryfe.  If I were going to kill
Professor X with a technovirus, I'd make pretty sure they couldn't get
a cure for it.
  2) Why would Sinister have to go to Stryfe for it?  If he can sneak
into the mansion virtually undetected, why can't he dig up Cypher's
grave on his own?  Okay, say Stryfe beat him to it.  Sinister seems
the type to just go in and steal it back, or barring that just travel
to another timeline where Stryfe didn't.
  3) Sinister says it is a "piece of the future".  Cypherlock's
remains just don't fit the bill.
  Of course, since when has logic stopped Marvel?  :+)
        
                                     -Drizzt the "Idiot"  :+)
-- 
************************************************************************
Jeff Barnes                   "Mike, if my father were alive today, you
Western Kentucky University          know what he'd say?"
BarneJD@WKUVX1.BITNET         "'Help, help, get me out of this coffin'?"
The few, the proud, the LNH!                -SPIDER-MAN 2099 #1
My opinions are not necessarily those of WKU, but they should be!  :+)
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: Re: Cable possibilities
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 21:53:11 GMT

In article <1alvhaINNeq3@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bd112@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Craig H. Rettig) writes:
>
>OK, I have several working theories on who Cable might be:
>
>2)  Crazy Nate from the pages of Guardians of the Galaxy. As 
>    pointed out by a correspondence to Wizard magazine.
>
>
Readers of GotG know that this is, as Craig Anderson (editor) called it, a
red herring.  The commandeers (or whatever) were an homage to the 
Howling Commandoes.  They saud that there is no connection 'tween Cable
and nate.

----SCAVENGER 

-- 
KHAN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Khan)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai
From: dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu (David Henry)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: FAVORITE X-VILAINS (was Re: Just a thought)
Keywords: Villains, highlords,dream
Date: 6 Oct 92 02:48:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: plains.20977
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

In article <1992Oct3.183703.10189@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER) writes:
>I thought that Rev. Striker (from _GOD LOVES, MAN KILLS_) was one of the best
>X-men villains.  He's the personification of what the x-men fight against
>Blind hatred and prejudice.

I dunno. Gruenwald's semi-tepid Watchdogs cover the blind hatred and
prejudice in the MU, IMO. What made GL,MK so powerful for me was Claremont's
examination of WHY Reverend Stryker (sp. ?) hated mutants. He wasn't just
a cliche character... he had a reason to hate them, and a background to
hate them. Not a very good reason, mind you, and not a very cheerful
background, but still a fine job of character drawing by CC.

-- 
David R. Henry - Rogue Fan Club - CTHULHU in '92! Why vote for LESSER evils?
"Boy, do I love PLASTIC!" -- TJ Teru // What was your question? --Kate Bush
"All you of Earth are IDIOTS!"-P9fOS // Thanks... for the memories.--Rogue
dhenry@plains.nodak.edu * ud137927@ndsuvm1.bitnet * ud137927@vm1.nodak.edu