HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame,misc.test
Subject: Re: reply to Bur
Date: 12 Nov 92 22:30:28 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame,misc.test
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Scranton

In article <1992Nov5.043627.5903@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC) writes:
> In article <1992Nov4.094503.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>>In article <1992Oct29.003431.12269@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC) writes:
>>> In article <1992Oct26.162050.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>>>>In article <1992Oct24.020157.29405@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC) writes:
>>>>> In article <1992Oct22.150847.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:

>>*Not to be a copycat or anything, but obviously, you are misinformed for
>>Troll is male
> This is obviously open to debate.  I liken you to Pat on Sat. Night Live.

*I liken you to a flea to be flea-flicked away like the bug that you are,
 so what is your point?  My point is that you are a moron, undebatably, (hence
 the M for "moron", and I am male which everyone knows, undebatably. i.e. fact.
 
>>and Mr. Buffalini isn't handling anyone's clit that we know of.
> 
> That is probably correct.  Nor has he ever, save the little interludes between
> you two. 

* the only "little interludes" going on are between your ego, your hand, and
 your dick, Bur.  The only question that we, the public, may have is which of
 the two your hand is stroking at any given time.

> Face it Troll, you are a third rate wanker at a fourth rate university.

*Face it Bur, you are a no rate flamer, flaming from the terminal in your cell
 wherever they keep you.  Uh-oh, you'd better unplug your computer before they
 come by for your daily hose-down.  I wouldn't want you to get electricuted or
 anything.
				Troll
> M

P.S.  I'll send you some more of that rubber wall paper so you don't get hurt
during one of your fits.

P.P.S.  Since, it's rubber, you can wipe the spooge off when your done whacking
off, and it won't stain. You can even draw on it with your crayola markers :-).
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:45:31 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.152056.25923@cas.org> esp51@cas.org writes:
>
> (William M. Everett) writes:
> esp51@cas.org writes:
>
>>>whimpy authority worshipping conservative, who is defending
>>>his sacred authority figures George Felon Bush, and Dan Idiot Quayle,
>>>even after they've been run out of the white house like scorched rats
>>>from a burning ship.
>>
>> What a ridiculous stereotype you have cooked up.
>
>Not ridiculous at all.  For years, King George, former director of the

>Dan Quayle was a complete idiot, an attack dog puppet of the Snake Oil

	The stereotype was about ME. You don't know anything about me and
you have already come to a conclusion about me. I suppose it's easier than
actually using your brain and listening to my arguments.


>Sweating Jeeehzus on a Jetski.  Anybody who isn't a brainwashed conservative
>idiot can plainly understand Bush's bashing of Atheists.  Your tired

	More stereotypes. Maybe people who aren't quite so simple-minded
can see the world in slightly more complicated terms. But don't worry, I
don't expect that depth of thought from you anyway.
 
>semantic arguements remind me of the guy who continuously drives his car
>around the block because his turn signal has stuck.  Your blind ideaology,
>in the traditional form of conformist authority brown nosing conservatism,
>erases any perceptive abilities or common sence you once might have had.

	More stereotypes. Gosh, your just full of them. It's not the only 
thing you're full of.

>Face it, the moral majority swine who have running the country for 12 years
>are in decline, and you are just another terminal case of a dying breed.

	Have you read my posts? You are jumping to unwarranted conclusions.
Again, I suppose I can't expect better from you.

>Come 1993, we're all looking forward to pissing on your grave, loser.

	Is this a threat?

>
>Scott Park
>Opinions are mine, I am not company spokesman.

William Everett
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 18:01:17 GMT

> syrjanen@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi writes:
>>                 SCOTTY LE DOGbreath


ahh, another clueless newbie attemtps to use alt.flame as a way to meet
my dog and have wonderful sensations with him. However, once again, the
newbie (a fin this time) falls short in his quest. K E N has rented my
dog for the next several weeks, then Lara's gets her crack at him, so
why dont you hop a plane to america and get in line. My dog would
probably like to add a little international flavor to his daily routine
of hollwood starlets and net.nerds........
From: liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 11 Nov 1992 14:09:38 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu



What the hell should we care what you think of our ex-president...you don't
even live here.  :-p

						--liz
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Ken: What Insomniacs Need  [was: Ken is not boring]
Keywords: doze nap pillow-drool 40-winks sleep
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 19:14:07 GMT

In article <BxH3Hq.L2L@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>(Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>K e n does not bore people, for K e n is K e n, and K e n can only be
>>K e n, thus K e n is K e n and only K e n.
>>
>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>
>zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz---*  eh?  What?
> 
>I'm sorry Kenny, what was that?  I must have dozed off.

K e n said that K e n does not bore people, for K e n is K e n, and K e n
can only be K e n, thus K e n is K e n and only K e n.

In the future, please sleep in something appropriate for this
function. A terminal is not appropriate.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: hennessy@acsu.buffalo.edu (DOG BASEBALL!!!)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: U2
Date: 11 Nov 92 07:17:21 GMT
Organization: Ministry of Information, Lower Volta.


	that quote would come from Bono, perpetrator of pompous arrogant
quotes such as: "We don't need our old fans" (paraphrased) and "Why do you
think I'm being nice to you?" 
	rotten puke.  Still like edge's jangly geetar tho.


-- 
   /I\          Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke.
  /(*)\         hennessy@acsu.buffalo.edu                 
 /IIIII\        "Leave EVERYTHING to ME!" - Powdered Toast Man       
/IIIIIII\       Happiness is a warm gun.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: to the real peter nyikos
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 13:56:08 GMT

another clueless newbie who calls him or herself
kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
->In article <n+r1ba#@rpi.edu>
->> i think you should do something about those kids who
->> are posting from your account. really.
->> 
->> they've made you appear to be quite the fool, as well
->> as a liar.
->>
->Who are you talking to?  

what does the subject line say, twit?

->I don't see any "Reference:" field, nor is there
->the merest hint of a quote.

where do you think original posts come from, the easter
bunny?

maybe the name "kevin" makes them this way.
From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Date: 6 Nov 92 18:57:37 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1dbjpcINNoub@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>In article <Bx5vzy.208@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>
>>K e n does not bore people, for K e n is K e n, and K e n can only be
>>K e n, thus K e n is K e n and only K e n.
>>
>
>Wait wait wait a minute...K e n is K e n, therefore K e n does not bore people?
>I'm having a problem with the logical connection between the two...

Simple, K e n is K e n, and since K e n is K e n, then K e n is K e n,
and thus K e n is not boring, for K e n can only be K e n.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: jcc@frog.CRDS.COM (Jim Chagnon)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Rabbit-knowing
Date: 5 Nov 92 19:26:04 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: CRDS

In article <1992Nov2.163113.5403@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) correctly titles his post:

>BULLSHIT.
>BULLSHIT
>BULLSHIT.

>It is not cowardly. The proper adjective you seek is 'polite'. I have no 
>desire to actually hurt anyone feelings on these groups, and therefore
>I only excoriate them in a froup which was designed for such insults. In
>fact, the reason alt.flame was created was to prevent flamewars from
>taking up space in other serious groups. The reason I do not cross post
>such articles is in the interest of consideration for the readers of the
>other groups who do not wish to wade through long flames.

 Nonsense.  You got such a warm welcome in talk.bizarre that you decided 
to steal one of rdc's schticks and take it someplace he doesn't post to,
in the hope of gaining some of his popularity without the hassle of having
to be original or amusing all on your own.

> Plus, then all
>the rec.pets nerds would cross-post into alt.flame, 

 Yes, and you've already seen what this has done to Roger's popularity in
t.b.  Face it.  You're a cowardly little weasel, sophomoric insults and
obscenity for shock value are the best you can do.

>and we already have a good supply of idiots over here.

 Then why are you trolling rec.pets?  If you truly wished to reduce the
idiot population of alt.flame, the best thing you could possibly do is 
unsubscribe.  Imagine the warm feeling of success at finally meeting a goal
and doing something useful.  Huh?  Why, yes.  It -is- alot like when you
wet yourself, only nobody will point and laugh.

> My policy is based on proper netiquette, and I have no plans to change it.

 Translation:  "If I actually posted this to rec.pets, they'd know I'm just
a lame Carasso fan-boy".

> These posts are a lot less
>boring than Ken's typical "you have been misinformed" posts.

 And who the hell died and made -you- judge of what the rest of us find 
boring?

 Never mind, you're right.  Presumptuous, but correct.  If I wished to
place a qualative value on how much more interesting you are than Ken,
there are an infinite number of values between zero and 0.000001% that 
should do quite nicely.

 Perhaps the both of you could just fuck off?

Jim Chagnon  jcc@frog.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bob@dolores.Stanford.EDU (Bob Lodenkamper)
Subject: Re: Twice Fucked (Colorado gays)
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Computer Systems Laboratory, Stanford University
	<1992Nov10.183156.24715@spdcc.com>
	<BOB.92Nov10143132@dolores.Stanford.EDU> <911@dsbc.icl.co.uk>
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:17:29

In article <911@dsbc.icl.co.uk> kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:

   In article <BOB.92Nov10143132@dolores.Stanford.EDU>
   bob@dolores.Stanford.EDU (Some Geek) writes: 
   >
   > The fact that a great many people *are* willing to put up with (or
   > turn a blind eye toward) a lesser evil, as shown by the respective
   > elections, does not mean there is no such thing as a "lesser evil".
   > It simply means that there are a lot of stupid, shallow and/or
   > malicious voters who will buy into such rationalizations.
   >
   Yeah, right.  If you don't fuckin like it, go and live somewhere
   else, arsewipe - like smeggin Iraq!

Witty.  I bet you think the name change in the byline is original.

   I don't beleive it.  Every four/five years all the geeks come out
   to play, get on their high horses and run about thinking they're
   the second comming of Christ and that they can fix all the world's
   problems by posting to alt.flame.

You're illiterate and clueless, as well.  No surprise there.  

   Now just shut the fuck up for another five years, I'm sick of this
   bullshit already.  In the mean time, you can go off and look in the
   Exchange and Mart for a second-hand life!  Don't bother asking K e
   n, somone bought his life when he was two and he doesn't know it's
   missing yet.

Are the alt.flame regulars ignoring you?  If not, they should.

Oh, by the way, US general elections occur every four years, so four
years from now there will be another set of US political crosspostings
into alt.flame.  If this disrupts your favorite circle-jerk with
like-minded and benighted "regulars", too bad.

- Bob
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n again!
Date: 12 Nov 1992 16:51:27 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: caraway.csv.warwick.ac.uk

I reakon K e n has the lot of you by the balls.

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: esp51@cas.org ()
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 15:20:56 GMT

 (William M. Everett) writes:
 esp51@cas.org writes:

>>whimpy authority worshipping conservative, who is defending
>>his sacred authority figures George Felon Bush, and Dan Idiot Quayle,
>>even after they've been run out of the white house like scorched rats
>>from a burning ship.
>
> What a ridiculous stereotype you have cooked up.

Not ridiculous at all.  For years, King George, former director of the
CIA, was running secret black operations out of the basement of the
whitehouse, including Iran-Contra, the pet project of his geru Teflon Ron.
Dan Quayle was a complete idiot, an attack dog puppet of the Snake Oil
Christian Coalition.

>       I see... I simply pointed out that something was not true. It seems
>to me that Nazis are much more akin to somebody who attacks others for pointing
>out the truth.
>
Sweating Jeeehzus on a Jetski.  Anybody who isn't a brainwashed conservative
idiot can plainly understand Bush's bashing of Atheists.  Your tired
semantic arguements remind me of the guy who continuously drives his car
around the block because his turn signal has stuck.  Your blind ideaology,
in the traditional form of conformist authority brown nosing conservatism,
erases any perceptive abilities or common sence you once might have had.
Face it, the moral majority swine who have running the country for 12 years
are in decline, and you are just another terminal case of a dying breed.
Come 1993, we're all looking forward to pissing on your grave, loser.

Scott Park
Opinions are mine, I am not company spokesman.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: RE: THE ULTIMATE FLAME OF FLAMES
From: ooi@latcs2.lat.oz.au (Jeffrey K Ooi)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 08:48:03 GMT
Organization: Comp Sci, La Trobe Uni, Australia

usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.Edu writes:

>{lameness and whitespace deleted)
>>
>>-- 
>>  Jeffrey (George bush) Ooi |   Ghostrider, you're instructed to land...    
>>  La Trobe University       |   Land Immediately!  What're you doin' Mav?
>>  Australia                 |   We ain't got no fuel for this...
>   ^^^^^^^^^

>you already flamed yourself, why should i bother?

At least I have a signature!

Which is more than I can say about Mr Aussie hater here, or do you prefer
the occasional Rodney King riot or two hmmm?  This country must be too boring 
for you!
-- 
  Jeffrey (George bush) Ooi |   Ghostrider, you're instructed to land...    
  La Trobe University       |   Land Immediately!  What're you doin' Mav?
  Australia                 |   We ain't got no fuel for this...
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Thanks, Melvin Millard.
Summary: I'll put this on my fridge.
Date: 12 Nov 92 05:08:18 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

(Melvin Gladstone) writes:
>     
>   %%%%%%    %        %%%%%%%        %           %
>  %      %   %%     % %      %        %         %
>  %      %   % %    % %      %         %       %
>  %%%%%%%%   %  %   % %      %          %     %
>  %      %   %   %  % %      %           %   %
>  %      %   %    % % %%%%%%%             % %
>  %      %   %     %%                      %
>             %      %                      %
>                                           %
>                                           %
>                                           %
>                       
>Use this in the future.


  Gee, Thanks Mel.  It gives me a warm fuzzy feeling imagining all the 
  work you put into this.  I can almost see you biting your lip, furrowing
  your sloped brow in concentration as you did this.

  It *is* a bit uneven tho.  Next time don't use your left hand.  Wait until
  your right one isn't busy wacking your wee weasel.

  But, Hey!  It's the thought that counts.  Thanks bunches!

  --  Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: Suzanne-lucia.Demitrio@launchpad.unc.edu (Suzanne-lucia Demitrio)
Subject: Re: Consensus stuff - the real reasoning
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 03:26:15 GMT

In article <s5gbeus@zola.esd.sgi.com> cj@sgi.com writes:

>Keegie and DeMitrio disagree with you, Galen.  They think the
>mere mention of the existence of email is a heinous crime.

I don't recall ever having had occasion to comment on 'the mere mention of
the existence of email'.  

>Too bad I won't get to see their ceaseless harassment of 
>poor McBean.

Too bad indeed, considering that my only encounter with McBean involved
*agreeing* with him in the "Autumn Blues" thread.

What else have I been posting in my absence, CJ?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suzanne Lucia                   suzanne-lucia.demitrio@launchpad.unc.edu
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar Samant)
Subject: Re: Time to retire, assholes. (was "reason to exist" or some such fuck)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 08:03:57 GMT

mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone) writes:
>keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
>
>>some newbie twit named:
>>samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar Samant) writes:
>>[nothing of interest]
>>
>>when does your semester end, sonny?
>>
>when does your semester end, sonny?
> 
>WHEN DOES YOUR SEMSTER END, SONNY!!
> 
>This is the best you could come up with?  So you think he's in college, 
>who cares when his semester ends?


Mel, Mel, Mel! Down, boy. I can understand your honest rage, but this
posting of Keegan Jr is actually the snappiest one-liner he has ever
produced. Savour it, you won't find a better from Keegan Jr.

Always sum up the situation rationally, Mel, and give your considered
response. There's animal instincts out there, reigning free in Jimmy Keegan's
dog-viscera and he might get a stroke if he reads your amazingly brilliant 
counter-flame in one sitting.

He needs his ebbing energy for his replies to Darcy's babble, Mel. Give
him a break and leave this to me. Keegan Jr needs sweet talking and
cajoling. Shouting like you did will just startle him.

I worry for the poor thing's frail nerves already.

By the way, Mel, harden your heart, use your editor, and sacrifice your 
incredibly idiotic signature. It hurts people's eyes and makes them think 
whether reading alt.flame is worthwhile at all, what with the Darcies at 
one end and horseshit sigs at the other.


Sincerely,
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Rabbit-knowing
Date: 13 Nov 92 16:01:17 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1992Nov12.181214.14911@frog.CRDS.COM> jcc@frog.CRDS.COM (Jim Chagnon) writes:


> I dont know why you guys think being in love with a rabbit is so scandalous.
> I have been having a very warm relationship with my rabbit for years now,
> and it has only recently ceased to be platonic. Making love to my rabbit is
> the warmest feeling Ive ever known. Any of you who call me weird should
> just try it for yourself.

jim, why do you keep posting this little pathetic defense of yourself to
alt.flame? Shouldnt this be in alt.sex.bestiality? And what is this 
obsession with "frog". Why are all your machines named 'frog'? Is this
in reference to the fact that your dad called his dick "my frog" when 
he was punishing you with it? Does this have anything to do with your
recent arrest and conviction for tresspassing and crimes against nature
in the reptile house of your local zoo? just what is your deal, pindick?
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 07:53:45 GMT

In article <kmr4.172.721533993@po.CWRU.edu>, kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan) writes:
> 	
> 	Sit behind your little desk, and play your childish semantic games, 
> little William. I'm not very interested in arguing about the definition of 
> a particular word, or a set of words. 

.. or ideas, or valid points, or facts, or finite laws of government, or the
truth, or what the Constitution actually says, or the Supreme Court, or what
sort of person I actually am, or how pathetic my candidate really is... 

Yeah, William is the one being childish.

--The Phantom
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin)
Subject: Re: CAST YOUR VOTE: TROLL VS LARA
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 13:18:44 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.010640.26666@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC) writes:
>In article <jac.720907565@wesley> jac@doe.carleton.ca (James A. Cherry) writes:
>>In <1992Nov4.112915.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>>
>>>Lara wants a vote, folks, to decide who won our little flame war.  She needs
>>>the votes to patch up her quickly deflating ego and her ruptured breast
>>>implants.  So, let's oblige.  Cast your ballot for TROLL or LARA via post.
>>>
>>>I vote for me.
>>>
>>>Off to a good start already: Troll:1    Lara:0
>>>
>>>						Troll
>>
>>I vote for Lara.
>That's right, we'll vote cascade style.  Troll, it is painfully obvious
>to all who read this froup that you are a sack of grade A Scranton shit.
>Lara kicked your ass just as many before her did.
>Lets see, that gives us:  Troll:1    Lara:2
>
Hmm, I think what we're seeing here are a few pre=pubescent sexually
frustrated teenagers who are hoping that by voting for a female they may
get some needed attention or reward. Ain't gonna happen fellas. I bet that
Lara isn't even reading this newsgroup any more, and if she is, I bet
she isn't amused. 
   In any case, I think Troll held his own if not surpassed Lara, but both
participants in this "flame war" *snicker* have a lot to learn. You guys
seem to think that he who uses the most profanities wins. Yep. Great
flames. In any case, I abstain from voting, because I didn't really enjoy
reading either. So, are there any independents running out there I can
vote for? Hmmm.. I know:

Troll:1   Lara:2   Melvin:1   Elvis: 1

have a g'day

steve
-- 
aasdSteveFranklin-Subliminal Psychology Major.ks;dlasBlueJaysRULEkasdfeahsdbfl
sd;lfaswoq[eBuyMeAQuadra!!!mbnZMXCNdfsba;KdSPAMiuroqiyetIBMSuxiweuryth'ewr;mxn
qpuepriuPartyOneqtuj;,n.,xnc,kjasFlameMeNot!;lkj;lkgkjd;askElvisLivesjhfquweru
zx.cfranklin@ug.cs.dal.ca,sk;t;lrut[Superboy@ac.dal.cav.zx,Physics!eq3rwkh;oHA
Newsgroups: alt.flame