HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bkline@lhc.nlm.nih.gov.nlm.nih.gov (Bob Kline)
Subject: Re: How do IBM and FTP TCP/IP packages compare?
Organization: National Library of Medicine
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 03:10:38 GMT

Gerry Lachac (gerry@pizzabox.dialogic.com) wrote:
:  ......
: Now if only I can get Novell and FTP to share my SMC card...
: 
: -gerry

If you ever solve this one, PLEASE let me know how you did it!  I'd 
love to be able to talk to Netware and TCP without having to reboot
(without having to buy another TCP/IP package, that is, especially
since I've got an app that's written against FTP's API).

--
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* Bob Kline                                      Phoenix Systems, Inc. */
/* bkline@occs.nlm.nih.gov                        voice: (703) 522-0820 */
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Subject: Re: OS/2 Comm Programs?
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 02:38:04 GMT
Keywords: OS/2 COMM

In article <1992Nov16.180259.21184@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
> In article <BxrvwA.I83@world.std.com> jpole@world.std.com (Jamie C Pole) writes:
> >  Does anyone know of any good shareware (NOT begware or crippleware) PM
> >comm programs?  I use TE/2 right now, but it is text mode only...  Thanks
> >a lot...
> 
> Well, we have PM Terminal (which comes with OS/2 2.0, and which
> shouldn't be dismissed out of hand), PMQVT (which I don't like much),
> a PM version of Kermit (ditto; a bit dated, but it does do Tektronix),
> PMComm (crippleware; Zmodem and scripting work in the registered
> version), the WLO port of Windows Terminal (not my favorite), and
> perhaps a couple others.  All are available via anonymous ftp from
> ftp-os2.nmsu.edu.
> 
> There's no real standout in the bunch.  On the commercial side there
> are some darn good ones, like TalkThru, ChipChat, Dynacomm
> Asynchronous, and, soon, HyperAccess/5 PM.
> 

I just received HyperACCESS/5 V3.0 yesterday. It looks pretty good. The virus
detection on download and spell-checker in the editor are nice features. I
also like the ability to unzip  .ZIP files as they are received.......
 
I have been using TE/2 (registered), which I like. HyperACCESS/5 looks good
too. I will be very interested to see the PM version!
 
Steve


-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | On Sept. 19th, 88% of NZ voters opted
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         | for proportional representation. It
withers_s@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz            | looks like we may get a more  
**** Happy user of OS/2 v2!! ****       | democratic system "real soon now".
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Serive pack SVGA drivers _SLOW_!
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 15:56:11 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1992Nov21.133854.12251@mlb.semi.harris.com> dhumphre@comanche.ess.harris.com writes:
>Well, you may be in luck.  Last night I logged onto EXEC-PC and there was
>a new semi-generic 800x600 16 color svga driver.  In the docs for the
>program it stated that it should work for any card that OS/2 has base svga
>support for (This include Trident, Tseng 4000, and others).  I tried it
>out on my Diamond Speedstar+ and it seemed to work fine.  The OS/2 and Dos
>windows were definitely faster but I didn't notice much of a speed change
>with normal WPS windows (I'm currently using the service pack Tseng 4000
>drivers).  Hopefully these drivers should work there way to the Hobbes
>ftp site sometime soon.

They originated on ftp-os2.nmsu.edu.  :-)

The file is vga800-1.zip, in directory /pub/uploads on
ftp-os2.nmsu.edu via anonymous ftp.  (The file could be moved in the
near future.)

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.apps:8460 comp.os.os2.programmer:6556 comp.os.os2.misc:37116
From: cshaver@informix.com (Craig Shaver)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: BC++ for OS/2 announced - NOT!
Date: 19 Nov 92 19:45:12 GMT
Organization: Informix Software, Inc.

In article <1992Nov18.184951.25343@beaver.cs.washington.edu> andrewb@lynx.cs.washington.edu (Andrew Berg) writes:
>Sidney Markowitz (sidney@borland.com) wrote:
>: >I got this from a net in Canada:
>: >The Professional C and C++ Development System for OS/2
>: 
>: Sorry, folks, but BC++ for OS/2 has not been released. 
>		(other entertaining stuff deleted)
>
>Perhaps the people at Borland should take the fact that everyone seems
>to be holding their collective breaths waiting for BC++ OS/2 and step up
>the effort.  Perhaps Microsoft should notice the demand and put the OS/2

I just bought the Zortech product!

   Craig

-- 
Craig Shaver  (cshaver@informix.com for now) (415)390-0654 (415)926-6407
Productivity Group POB 60458 Sunnyvale, CA  94088
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Subject: Re: Service Pak, which one is latest?
Reply-To: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Organization: Columbia University, New York
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 04:31:03 GMT


Does anyone know why IBM doesn't do "diff"s instead of another 18/21 disks?
I just read in the readme file that if you want to do something such as add
a new printer under WIN-OS/2 you must reinstall GA, make the changes, and
reapply the SP!

When is the *real* version coming out?
Can I get it on CD-ROM?
:-(

 * * * * *  =================== Internet   mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
* * * * * * == Meir I. Green == AmateurPkt N2JPG@W2XO.PA.USA.NOAM
 * * * * *  = mig@columbia.edu= Amateur IP N2JPG@uhm.ampr.org
* * * * * * =================== BC-Goliath green@smtplink.barnard.columbia.edu
From: hacker@cco.caltech.edu (Jonathan Bruce Hacker)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Latest version of WPSBKUP
Date: 19 Nov 1992 06:03:23 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu

goyal@utdallas.edu (Mohit K. Goyal) writes:

>Does anyone know the latest version of WPSBKUP?

>Will it work with OS/2+Service Pack?

>Last I heard, the latest version (4 or 5) was only certified with OS/2 2.0
>and OS/2 2.x beta.

wpsbkup version 6 is on hobbes in /pub/uploads unless it has been moved
to /pub/os2/new

-- 
Jon Hacker
Caltech, Pasadena CA
hacker@tumbler-ridge.caltech.edu
From: sal8@po.cwru.edu (Steve Luzynski)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Monthly Planner OS/2 App
Date: 19 Nov 92 21:30:43 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b61442.student.cwru.edu

In article <1ebdf3INNiff@travis.csd.harris.com> kbeal@amber (Ken Beal) writes:
>From: kbeal@amber (Ken Beal)
>Subject: Re: Monthly Planner OS/2 App
>Date: 17 Nov 92 18:25:39 GMT
>K.N. Kumar (kumar@ee.rochester.edu) wrote:
>: I have a question about the Monthly planner PM app that is bundled
>: with OS/2. How do I get the Monthly planner to start up using a 
>: custom planner file that I have saved. Presently I need to go to the
>: file menu to open the planner file once the Monthly planner App is started.
>
>	Well, I do this with the "To-Do" list program; it should work the
>same with the monthly planner.
>
>	First make sure that the types are set properly for the extension you
>use for the monthly planner.
>
>	Then, just call the *file*, and the program will automagically start
>up around it.  I put my "To-Do" list file in the startup folder, so it starts
>up whenever I boot.
>
>	Now I have a question: how do I tell it to start maximized?

Wow...learn something new every day. I was wondering how to get them to 
_not_ start maximized. 
To do that, put the program object in the startup folder and give it the 
filename of the data file in settings->parameters. Note that you'll need 
quotes if you used spaces.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Luzynski @ Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, OH
sal8@po.cwru.edu             | voice calls cheerlessly accepted at x2153.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
happy people are deluding themselves that there is nothing wrong.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Can anyone recommend a text editor?
From: djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum)
Date: 20 Nov 92 14:34:35 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

Can anyone recommend a fairly simple character-mode text editor for use
in OS/2 window sessions? I have tried ted, tinyed, and the and don't
like the interface on any of them. The model I have in mind is Qedit for
MS-DOS.

I would much prefer a free or shareware product, since I'm apparently
fussy about editors and don't want to pay for something sight unseen and
then find I don't like it, but all recommendations are welcome.

Thanks,

David
-- 
Professor David J. Birnbaum         djbpitt+@pitt.edu [Internet]
The Royal York Apartments, #802     djbpitt@pittvms   [Bitnet]
3955 Bigelow Boulevard              voice: 1-412-687-4653
Pittsburgh, PA  15123  USA          fax:   1-412-624-9714
From: UJCF@DKAUNI2.BITNET (Jochen Friedrich)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: TE/2 question
Date: 15 Nov 92 16:42:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: rz.1992Nov15.164216.11117
Organization: University of Karlsruhe, Germany

try using the editor e.exe, it does the conversion automatically.
----
Jochen Friedrich
From: kxc@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU (Khuanchai Chooboonraj)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Which FAX software for os2?
Date: 23 Nov 1992 23:39:41 +1100
Organization: University of Melbourne
NNTP-Posting-Host: ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au

apoulsen@athena.mit.edu (Andy Poulsen) writes:

>hi,

>which FAX software works best under os2?  i'm especially interested in
>something that will let me treat it as a printer driver (preferably
>something that i can use postscript fonts with so that i can send
>documents that i've already got...)  does winfax pro work under win-os2?
>and if so, will it receive in the background (i have a graphics ultra
>and don't run seamless windows -- i use the hi-res desktop instead) if i
>leave it running in a win-os2 session?

>any help much appreciated!

Winfax Pro works under Win-OS2 but it's not that good. Call SofNet, Inc. on
(404) 984-8088 or fax (404) 984-9956 asking them about "PMfax". It uses
PM printer drivers for printing.

It's a good product, you will like it.

cheers,
kc

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
| Khuanchai Chooboonraj                                 |
| TK International Pty Ltd                              |
| Internet: kxc@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au                |
| INTLnet: 58:4100/24@intlnet.org                       |
| Fidonet: 3:634/383@fidonet.org                        |
| Mail: P.O. Box 178, Newport, Victoria 3015, Australia |
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: jdecarlo@mitre.org (John DeCarlo)
Subject: Re: Windows under OS/2
Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean  VA
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 13:18:54 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.210602.3841@ctp.com>
 jcohe@ctp.com (Jeffrey Cohen) writes:

>I am investigating the "realistic" use of MS Windows applications in
>a MS Windows shell in OS/2 2.0.  The FAQ sheet suggests that the performance
>loss of DOS programs is minimal, but it does not mention the performance
>of a Windows program.  All the literature also suggests that a Windows
>program can be "seamlessly" run in OS/2 2.0, but I have only seen MS Windows
>programs run in the MS Windows Full Screen shell with considerable performance
>loss.

I use MS Windows apps under full-screen WINOS2 all the time.  On my machine, 
it is noticeably faster than Windows 3.0, but slower than MS-Windows 3.1.  
Bue of course I switched from Win 3 to OS/2 2 before ever getting Win 3.1, 
so I was happy from day one.  

Since I can't give up the performance of OS/2, I will just have to wait for 
Win 3.1 support in WINOS/2 to get out of beta.

John DeCarlo, MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA--My views are my own
Fidonet:  1:109/131  Internet:  jdecarlo@mitre.org
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Trouble with Excel after SP
Date: 17 Nov 92 16:58:20 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <9211172327@ritz.mordor.com> ritz@ritz.mordor.com (Christopher Mauritz) writes:
>That must be a 2.1 specific problem.  Excel 4.0 is running on my machine
>with no problems whatsoever.  However, I'm worried that Msoft will
>sneak in code in a future release designed to torpedo OS/2 as it has
>been claimed they did with earlier versions of DOS to break Lotus 123.

This will necesarilly cause problems. Excel versions prior to 3.0 were
meant for Windows version 2.x, and cause problems with 3.x.  As a
matter of fact, Windows 3.0 would give you a warning if you tried to
run Excel 2.1 under it in standard or enhanced mode.



-- 
  |)  David Charlap          | .signature confiscated by FBI due to
 /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu | an ongoing investigation into the
((|,)                        | source of these .signature virusses
 ~|~
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: sdun@isma.demon.co.uk (Stephen Dunne)
Subject: OS/2 and Compuserve HELP !!! SUMMARY !!! 
Distribution: world
Organization: International Securities Market Association
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 23:39:08 +0000

Try to get hold of Creative Systems on 71511.151@compuserve.com

Stephen

--
This Mail was brought to you by PCElm 3.01.
From: ygoland@edison.seas.ucla.edu (The Jester)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Service Pak, which one is latest?
Date: 22 Nov 92 04:44:54 GMT
Organization: Republicans for Sanity

Do I need to get spg3*.dsk and spg5*.dsk? There is over 10 MEGS of
stuff there!!! What is this a service pack or another release of
os/2?!?
					The Jester
-- 
 			The Jester
"Freedom isn't Free"-The U.S. Army
"Nothing is too wonderful to be true"-Faraday
"If I knew it all, what would I be doing HERE?"-The Jester
From: ygoland@edison.seas.ucla.edu (The Jester)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: EZTAPE/PM FROM MAYNARD(IRWIN) INFORMATION!!!!
Date: 20 Nov 92 20:50:28 GMT
Organization: Republicans for Sanity

O.k. this info is direct from maynard (the owners of irwin):
If you want to purchase eztape/pm on upgrade it will cost you $99.
To order call:1-800-524-7946, ext 4707. This will take you directly
to the os/2 order desk, you won't have to wait in a phone que (which
I had to and it took 20 minutes, a major pain). I just ordered
it. I don't know how good it is, but since I'm a captive market, I
don't get much of a choice.
					Jester  
p.s. I also just ordered ibm's os/2 anti-viral product, anyone know
how good it is? (I figured for $40 bucks (with tax and shhipping)
I'll try it, its the only os/2 specific product I know. I'm already
running McAffee, F-Prot, and I-M) 
-- 
"Only the blind see in color."
"Any union based upon pigment is foolish ignorance designed to
give power to those few who enjoy power's taste above the common
welfare."
From: pgleason@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Pat Gleason)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: EZTAPE/PM FROM MAYNARD(IRWIN) INFORMATION!!!!
Date: 21 Nov 92 17:38:58 GMT
Organization: NCR Engineering and Manufacturing Atlanta -- Atlanta, GA

In <8704@lee.SEAS.UCLA.EDU> ygoland@edison.seas.ucla.edu (The Jester) writes:

>it. I don't know how good it is, but since I'm a captive market, I
>don't get much of a choice.

What ever you do, don't use their install program (it will screw up your 
config.sys and the install program will lock up). Manually install it
following the directions in the manual.

I have seen several small bugs, including the program totally crashing
when trying to view the files in a backup set using the library.

All in all, a decent OS/2 backup program, but keep in mind that if
you have a system crash and need to reinstall from your backup tape
that OS/2 (including PM) must be installed for you to restore that
tape.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Subject: Re: Service Pak, which one is latest?
Reply-To: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Organization: Columbia University, New York
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 05:45:27 GMT

In article <1992Nov21.034018.25109@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov20.043103.18364@news.columbia.edu> mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green) writes:
>>Does anyone know why IBM doesn't do "diff"s instead of another 18/21 disks?
>>I just read in the readme file that if you want to do something such as add
>>a new printer under WIN-OS/2 you must reinstall GA, make the changes, and
>>reapply the SP!
>
>Why no diffs?  Well, because many systems have ad hoc patches
>(remember all those, "Oh, you want the COM.SYS patch, available via
>anonymous ftp from software.watson.ibm.com..."?)  Doing byte diffs on
>such permutations would be a nightmare.

Agreed; I am thinking more along the lines of diffs to the GA disks themselves!

>>When is the *real* version coming out?
>>Can I get it on CD-ROM?
>>:-(
>
>They'll probably do a production code update sometime in December (I
>expect; nothing official).  They'll probably call that "Refresh Level
>2.00.1."

Ah!  That's what I thought the SP would be!  I can't wait :-)
I hope it is that soon...and available on the net!

> As for CD-ROM, you can already get OS/2 2.0 there (via the
>PDK CD-ROM or the Ultimedia CD-ROM -- I list the part number for the
>latter in the FAQ List).  You'll hear more about CD-ROM distribution
>in the future, no doubt.

No doubt a wise way to distribute since all the trade rags and people who
have installed it have discovered what a pain it is to install it...and
reinstall it....

It's worth it.
:-)

But CD-ROM for general distribution would also be worth it!
They might even find CD-ROM drive sales to triple afterwords!

:-)
Meir

 * * * * *  =================== Internet   mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
* * * * * * == Meir I. Green == AmateurPkt N2JPG@W2XO.PA.USA.NOAM
 * * * * *  = mig@columbia.edu= Amateur IP N2JPG@uhm.ampr.org
* * * * * * =================== BC-Goliath green@smtplink.barnard.columbia.edu 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: bbs.bromgrev@tsoft.sf-bay.org (Carl Merritt)
Subject: Re: Star Control 2 under OS/2
Organization: The TSoft BBS and Public Access Unix, +1 415 969 8238
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:58:59 GMT

rob@cad4.lbl.gov (Barracuda) writes:

> 
> Has anyone been able to get Star Control 2 to work under OS/2?
> (I've got the CSD installed if that makes a difference). It seems
> to either fail with an error or hang up OS/2 entirely. If you've got 
> it working please let me know what settings you're using.

I'm using straight 2.0, and StarCon2 works okay, just that all the sounds 
don't work, but those can be turned off.  Otherwise I just dual boot to 
msdos5 and play from there.

Carl
BBS.Bromgrev@Tsoft.SF-Bay.org

--
Carl Merritt (bbs.bromgrev@tsoft.sf-bay.org)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: rgaudre@polaris.unm.edu (Ron Gaudreau)
Subject: Re: Service Pak, which one is latest?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 11:52:40 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque


 If you installthe Service Pak and are using HPFS you may wish to call
IBM and get the instructions that they left out. There is a possiblity
that the HPFS partitions could become corrupt. I learned this from
one of the IBM support personel who was working on my video problems.

Maybe they included them with the service pak that is at software.watson.
The service tech that I was speaking with was very upset with the service
pak team for not including these when they released the service pak.

-- 
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
        Ron Gaudreau              | rgaudre@polaris.unm.edu  
    University of New Mexico      |
From: nyet@cco.caltech.edu (n liu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Stacker for OS/2 ?
Date: 23 Nov 1992 23:19:47 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu

pvonk@scott.skidmore.edu (Pierre VonKaenel) writes:

>In article <1992Nov23.023600.11196@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:

>So, how well does it work?  I've seen this program mentioned numerous
>times, but don't recall any opinions expressed.  Anyone who had
>Stacker for DOS using  DCF/2?  Care to share your experiences,
>reviews..?

The Stac rep at Comdex was demo-ing the beta; it looked pretty good.
The barebones OS/2 GA system partition stacked to about 2:1.

Keep in mind that they only had the FAT version going at the booth... HPFS 
support still has a ways to go (according to the booth critter).
-- 
nyet@cco.caltech.edu
From: djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: AmiPro 3.0 font metrics wrong?
Keywords: font metrics, AmiPro 3.0, WYSIWYG?
Date: 17 Nov 92 23:15:19 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

>The appearance on
>the screen is not good, but just about acceptable, but when I print a
>page! I get mysterious extra blank spoace, as you describe, but the
>print size is way out and the characters themselves look as if they've
>been printed on a particularly bad 9-pin dot matrix printer. 

The default resolution in AmiPro seems to 75 dpi. Don't ask me why;
nobody prints in draft mode on laser printers nowadays. But change it to
300, where it belongs, and things should improve. Took me a while to
figure this one out; thanks, Lotus!

--David

-- 
Professor David J. Birnbaum         djbpitt+@pitt.edu [Internet]
The Royal York Apartments, #802     djbpitt@pittvms   [Bitnet]
3955 Bigelow Boulevard              voice: 1-412-687-4653
Pittsburgh, PA  15123  USA          fax:   1-412-624-9714
Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.apps:8309 comp.os.os2.programmer:6449 comp.os.os2.misc:36573
From: zeta%tcscs@idss.nwa.com (Gregory Youngblood)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: BC++ for OS/2 announced.
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 15:17:25 CST
Reply-To: srcsip!tcscs!zeta
Organization: TCS Consulting Services

kumarad@ecf.toronto.edu (KUMARADAS JOSEPH CARL) writes:

> I got this from a net in Canada:
> 
> 
>  Date: 11-05-92, 16:06                    Number: 21589
>  From: COLIN BOWERN                        Refer: 0
>    To: ALL                                 Recvd: No
>  Subj: BORLAND C++ OS/2                     Conf: I-OS/2
> 
> Announcing Borland C++ for OS/2!
> ================================
> The Professional C and C++ Development System for OS/2
> 
>     Borland C++ for OS/2 features a 32-bit optimizing C and C++ compiler, a
> Presentation Manager-hosted intergrated Development Environment (IDE), Turbo
> Debugger, and all the tools necessary to support OS/2 2.0 applications
> development.
> 
How much is this?


BP7 is out, and supposedly can produce 'family' files for DOS or OS/2 1.x.

Does anyone know this for sure?

Greg


.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.
.   TCS Consulting Services   P.O. Box 600008   St. Paul, MN  55106-0008    .
.   ..!srcsip!tcscs!zeta                 ..!src.honeywell.com!tcscs!zeta    .
.   zeta%tcscs@idss.nwa.com                      tcscs!zeta@idss.nwa.com    .
.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.