HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: Re: A day in the life of: JEFF WITTY
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:04:03 GMT

01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:

>> Mark B. 
>> a.k.a. PROUD CIVILIAN OF THE FROSTY CANADIAN NORTH

>Ha! Loser. Enjoy the cold beer, cold woman and polar bears. Cheers asshole!

Would you rather have warm beer?  Cold woman.  Trust me, there's more than
one of us up here, and it's actually rather hot right now.  Polar bears?
I think I've seen one on TV....

>JEFF WITTY
>ARMY R.O.T.C.
>a.k.a. WARM, SUN LOVIN', CHECKING OUT THE NEAR NAKED GIRLS AT THE BEACH, PROUD
>       SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY.

KMM
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Phantom Exposed: His real name is Vinson Scott Goddard!
Date: 27 Jan 93 00:43:36 GMT
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA

In article <C1G5rD.EH3@world.std.com>, martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan) writes:

> Well, actually, I busted the phantom a few days ago. When I sent him email
> about it he responded that I would be violating net.etiquette so I didn't
> out him (tm) (c).

Busted? The gloves are off Hannigan... and only one will stand. I'll be
waiting...

--The Phantom
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: John G. Robinson <robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: Sadness
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:04:44 GMT

In article <1jpsduINN3e6@thyme.csv.warwick.ac.uk> Mr T Moxey,
phuar@csv.warwick.ac.uk writes:
>2) To the person that said that job requirements are low in Britain

No, that is not what I wrote, idiot.  Read it again.  Concentrate
on not moving your lips so much as you do so.

>go to South Central LA, let's see how long you'd last. And yes,
before you
>ask, I've lived there

Oh, how lovely for you.  Send me a postcard when you move to
Bosnia, hm?

>at the age of 17, the British level of understanding at college
>is equivalent to what your countries 19 year olds are coping with.

By this formula, I'd estimate you to be about 12 years old.  Come
back when you can reach the bar.

**********
John G. Robinson                   Must be hell going through life
with a
robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu     name like moxie, when you have
none.
From: STUCS204@IBM3090.BHAM.AC.UK (Richard Thomas)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: ADMISSION. [was : Spineless michele etc]
Date: 25 Jan 93 14:21:35 GMT
Organization: The University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
NNTP-Posting-Host: ibm3090.bham.ac.uk

==============================================================================
Well we finally have an admission from the prize moron...

[much infighting between Mona and Michel(l)e deleted - usual reasons]
and then Michel(l)e "I am soooooooooooo butch" D'allagamincer says

"And I tell you something else: On my university, and HERE at FAGLAB, I have al
ways been considered the most MACHO and one of the most FUNNY LIKEABLE GUY. Don
't be confused. Macho doed not mean shit."

What can be said about that then? The rumour has been confirmed by the horses m
outh himself. He is still at FAGLAB. Hold on he called it faglab. GASP. Another
 admission from our normally butch boy. He was considered the most macho and fu
nny likeable guy. At faglab? This means that three men, in tight white tee-shir
ts, tight black leather outfits and with matching mustaches (we are talking Blu
e Oyster Bar in Police Academy here) said to him "Do you mind if we slip our st
ools around you, big boy?" and "How's about it big boy?" etc etc.
As he says Macho does not mean shit.
Could they have been lying to you?
I think so.

TTFN pastaboy.
Richard Thomas.

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson)
Subject: Re: A Confession
Organization: Dept. of Scientific Computing, Uppsala Univ.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:16:49 GMT

vsg001@acad.drake.edu wrote:
: 
: It's simple math, and even easier English.
: 

None of which, of course, you would recognise, even if
Jagdeep rammed a SCUD, with it written all over, up
your greasy Panty-ass.

/Par
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Beer, me Mason!
Date: 26 Jan 1993 18:16:39 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk
Keywords: Will U B My Valentine?

In article <C1G5nC.4rL@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
|(Mr J S Graley) writes:
|>katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
|>|
|>|Our Phantom is not only non-corporeal, he's clairvoyant!  Now if only
|>|he was telekinetic, he could transport Graley out of here.
|>
|>Much as I despise the use of 'translations' by wannabe flamers, I feel one is
|>necissary here:
|>
|>TRANSLATION:
|>
|>Ooh Phantom, your posts defending me were so brave, youre such a macho man, I
|>want you to come to california and fuck me. I haven't got worms living up
|>my cunt really - thats just a cruel rumour spread by the insect destruction
|>department. Plllleeeeeeesese pleee.. oops I just wet my pants.
|
|Hey, Graley.  I can see that you liked my original flame toasting your
|butt well enough to copy it, but don't try it on my fiancee, pal.
|
|Lady Katherine doesn't need the Phantom to defend her. 

Funny that. Phantom has defended her, on several occasions, and she has also
defended him.

Jealous?

You should be...

|Everyone knows that Katherine is a virgin.  We're both saving ourselves
|for marriage.

That's nice to know.

|-- Andy

~THE GREAT NAME
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: serickso@ub.d.umn.edu (Scott Erickson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: You are a alcoholic nerd
Date: 27 Jan 93 02:18:50 GMT
Reply-To: serickso@ub.d.umn.edu (Scott Erickson)
Distribution: alt
Organization: University of Confused Thought
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu


Previously afrolik@ub.d.umn.edu (Ed Olczyk) misspoke: 

>>Nobody cares that you wasted your time.  The fact that you waited all day to
>Ah, you are mistaken.  Apparently I care, otherwise I wouldn't have responded
>now would I?
Unfortunately, nobody other than you yourself seems to care.


>Yes, I am.  Your mindless babbling excites me a great deal.  As does your
>apparently advanced knowledge.  Maybe, after my schooling is done here I will
>be able to match wits with you.  Unfortunately, it appears that you would
>have to get some wits first.  Also I would care to wager that you wait all
>day to read newsgroups, since you obviously have no life whatsoever.

Your own words show what a fool you are.  You state that mindless babbling
excites you a great deal.  You also state that maybe after school you will be
able to match wits with me, yet you say I have get some wits first.  It
appears that only after going to school will you be able to match wits with a
witless person.  You certainly are stupid.

 
>Ah, yes, the old 'inability to get laid' line.  I used to use this when I
>wasn't getting any, either.  As such, I feel bad for you that you are having
>problems with the opposite sex.  Maybe if you spent some time in places other
>than a computer lab or at 'beer tasting festivals' you would be able to
>improve your relations with females.  (or whatever it is that you have
>relations with)

Out of the blue you start talking about beer, women and computer labs.  It
seems that you are suffering from a case of neurotic projection.  You see
faults in others that are in fact your own faults that you have projected
onto others.  It is evident from your incoherent jabbering that you are an
alcohol nerd incapable of dealing with women.  I suggest you go to the next
Losers Anonymous meeting to get some help for your deranged condition.
 

>There's that intelligence word again.  Did you just learn that today in your
>SSP class?  I'm very proud of you.

You should be proud of me, since there in nothing about you that you can be
proud of.  It is evident from your comment that you do not know what
intelligence is, probably because you do not possess any intelligence.
 
>Crony Frolik                                        afrolik@ua.d.umn.edu

Scott
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Agony Aunt Andys Helpline.
Date: 25 Jan 93 12:50:25 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <930725150730@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk>, STUCS204@IBM3090.BHAM.AC.UK (Richard Thomas) writes:
> ==============================================================================

[bullshit deleted]
> 
> Richard Thomas.

you are boring.

	Michele
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Summary: Man, I'm gettin' tired defending Lady Katherine's Honor.
Keywords: Only 20 shopping days left till Valentine's Day.
Date: 26 Jan 93 06:42:21 GMT
Organization: Love Stings.

(Mr J S Graley) writes:
>(Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>|maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
>|
>|>(Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>|>|There IS a difference, trust me.  Watch who you are flaming, or you may
>|>|find the combined wrath of all Welsh, Scottish and Irish upon your head.
>|
>|>Yeh, you canadians would know wouln't you?

It just so happens that I am, in large part, Irish.

>|
>|Yes, we would.  Why do you think our ancestors came here?  To get as far as
>|possible away from idiocy you call a country and the french, german and
>|Italian mishmash you call a culture.
>
>Read and learn, bitch...
>

I think I've told you about using that kind of language with Katherine.

> [ Graley's rantings deleted ]
>One line flames are not 'my thing'. I select my flames from a wide range of
>styles, using whatever is required for the given situation. You can see this
>by actually reading some of my previous flames to you and others (something
>you never normally do)

No one actually *reads* your posts.  What's your point?

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: MICHELE'S lecture (was Re:why?)
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:24:02 GMT

In article <1993Jan24.025349.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
> How gives a fuck?!? I didn't need to speak a perfect english 

The question that Michele has posed is:"How gives a fuck?"; or for those of you
that speak English, "How does one fuck?" Class today will be for Mr. Dallagata,
so Graley, you'll just have to sit out of this one.

MICHELE! You will pay attention when I speak to you!

Good. Now. "How gives a fuck". We will begin with your approach.

[1] You must go to a bar with a title such as "The new leaf" or "The Blue
oyster" . Here you will find a lot  of men who wear a lot of leather and are
named "Sally" or even "Michelle". (This should remind you a lot of Italia)

[2] Stay there for at least three hours, buying drinks for all of the men
there.

[3] When one of the men continues to insist on dancing with you, and declares
"The goggles are on honey!" It is time for your fun to begin.

[4] Go to the nearest hotel.

[5] Buy a room under the alias "Kevin Walsh". Since he has a universal account
for these sort of things, you will have no problem.

[6] Tie yourself to the bed using the numerous leather items that "Sally" has
provided.

[7] Butter yourself up nicely. And let the good times roll.

I would like to thank Mr. Kevin Walsh and Mr. J S Graley for making this
lecture possible. Through their invaluable postings they have provided plenty
of information on this subject. Thank you guys. Class dismissed.

--The Phantom
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:15:40 GMT

maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:

>In article <katherim.727571557@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>|I (THE GREAT NAME) write:
>|>However, feminists like you offer bad value for money. You demand too much and
>|>you offer too little. Thus you grow up alone.
>|
>|Your psychological analysis of my childhood is too profound.  Perhaps you
>|would like to tell me that I hate my mother or that I secretly lust after
>|my father?

>No, you hate your father and you secretly lust after your mother.

Tsk, tsk, tsk.  Freudian lesson #1:  one sees in others what one 
hides in oneself.

>Freud would turn in his grave if he read your crap.

If I could make Freud turn in his grave I would be very pleased.  I've never
heard of anyone so unscientific and idiotic do so much damage to so many 
people.  He doesn't deserve to rest in peace.


>~THE GREAT NAME
>-- 
>    Don't worry,
>     Its like in the comic books...
>      ITS NOT REAL!
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:26:09 GMT

You want to play spelling flames, jerry-reject.  Fine with me.  I have avoided
flaming your spelling ability Mr-"embarissing", because I can sypathize with
fellow spelling-morons.  But remember, you started it.

maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:

>In article <katherim.727651442@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>|
>|If axiom and oxymoron are "impressive" words, I'd like to take you on
>|at scrabble.  I've never seen anyone in the red on that that game
>|before.
>|
>|OOOH, a spelling flame.  Maybe I don't want to to take you on at 
>|scrabble after all.  It's true I have the spelling ability of Pakistani
>|mountain goat, but since, from what I hear, there is no Scand_I_navian
>|alive with enough intellegence to spell it right, I'm not to worried
>|about it.

>Hmm. Typical woman. Tries to have her cake and eat it. Let's see:

>(1) Someone rightly points out to her that showing off using words like
>    axiom and oxymoron. She responds by frigging off her little ego and 
>    going on about scrabble.

How about grammar flames too.  You might try writing in complete sentences,
or ones that make sense.  But of course even your complete senteces don't
make sense, so it's a hopeless cause to start off with.r

>(2) She stupidly makes a spelling mistake. Someone is kind enough to point 
>    it out to her, and she replies with a stupid winge about spelling
>    flames. 

Where, where?  I don't say any "winge" about spelling flames in the comments
you quoted.  I confess to not being the spelling-bee champion of the world.
So.  What's your point.

>Kathy, ever used the word 'hypocrite' in a game of scrabble? 
I may not be able to spell, but at least I can count.  Scrabble words can
only constist of 7 leters, or they must be compound words.  This is
neither.  How about if I "SPELL" it out for you.  Maybe then your protozoan
brain will registeri it.

               H   Y   P   O   C   R   I   T   E
               1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9 

And I thought I was bad at aritmatic.

>~THE GREAT NAME

>PS 
>You may wish to correct the two spelling mistakes in the section of your 
>posting I have quoted.

>PPS

>|On the serious side, Happy Chinese New Year to everyone.

>On the serious side, I have soaked all your tampons in superglue.

You don't have to flame me for saying Happy Chinese New Year just because
it's a bad year for you.  I'm sure we all understand how humiliated
you must feel in the year of the cock.

>-- 
>    Don't worry,
>     Its like in the comic books...
>      ITS NOT REAL!

Katherine Merle Mason
Ne Oublie....
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 05:50:16 GMT

vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:

>In article <rcl3ks-@rpi.edu>, cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:

>> It never ceases to amaze me how people can sit and type a long explanation
>> of why they don't have the time to actually type a couple of sentences that
>> would have proven their point anyway.

>Equally amazing are people who only sit on their ass, impling to all that only
>*they* are unique in their flames. 

That would be you, yes?

>You speak of brevity... why don't you make
>it easier on all of us and not write at all? 

Now now.  I know reading can be quite a trial when you're new at it.
All those big words that you have to look up in the dictionary (that's
d i c t i o n a r y.  Look it up.), and then all those entries have more
big words in them that you have to look up, and soon you have to get a
pencil and some paper, and you struggle in vain to remember how to write
ALL THOSE LETTERS down in a valiant attempt to make a list of words you
need to look up, and soon the whole process gets you so frustrated that
you scream, throw the pencil down in anger, and attempt to have sex with
farm animals.

But keep practicing.  The reading bit gets easier, though I imagine you're
quite accomplished with the farm animals.

>--The Phantom

                      -rocker
Xref: sparky alt.flame:18904 alt.stupidity:3727
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a la 400ci)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.stupidity
Subject: Re: crap chat
Date: 20 Jan 93 21:07:37 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1jhl8rINNj80@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk> maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:

>I found a crap chat and I wanna fuck it up.

>What you have to do is type
>telent 128.186.2.99 2010
>and be offensive (like NAME) until you get chucked off.
>simple!

You should be good at that.

 -----------Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS--------
 ObQuotes:
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
 "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

    Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Walsh Waaiiliing in FEAR  [was Re: FUQ!!!--Clarification]
Keywords: Tastes like Chicken
Date: 26 Jan 93 06:03:50 GMT
Organization: Romance, Inc.

Kevin Wailing Walsh ululates in terror:
>
>YeeeeeeeeeeeeHart!


This is the cry of fear Wailsh makes when I roast his butt with a flame.
It's much like the scream of a rabbit in that last instant when the 
eagle's shadow falls upon it... just before the strike.

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: why?
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 23:07:29 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.144401.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:

> How you losers can kick my ass painfully, it is something that I 
					    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> can't understand, there are no way. So, you didn't.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I'm afraid Wop, this just about sums up your entire existence. Deal with it...

--The Phantom
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Typical dangerous dalligator crap.Shoot him now.
Date: 25 Jan 93 12:27:20 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <931325131357@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk>, STUCS204@IBM3090.BHAM.AC.UK (Richard Thomas) writes:
> ==============================================================================
> The miserable excuse for a _man_(???) spews
> 
> "Sorry Jason. I thought you had a mind, I discovered you are a moron, and since
>  I am in mission for *GOD*, I flame you, up to the day that you'll die.Your fau
> lt, you are clueless."
> 
[2000 line Moana Posting style deleted]

Moana! Do you see what you did?!? With your kilometric posts,
now all the fanatics think that alt.flame is a trashcan 
where they can put all their garbage! Pfui.
> 
> DIE.
> 
> Richard Thomas.

   Fuck you, Sir Thomas, get a real life.

	Michele
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: lil patty trauma
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 16:26:53 GMT


> rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) writes:

>
>I don't hate alt.flame, dear, it's my favorite newsgroup and has been
>since 1984.  
>

Well, gosh, patti, one would think that after 9 years of reading this
group we might see an occasional glimmer of humor, quality, or
originality in your lames. instead you pull the old and well hated
trick of getttng in personal arguments, and quoting page after
page after page of this argument to throw in your stupid no-brain
one liners. some people never learn, i guess.

>---------------
>It's too bad you're too deeply insecure to ever see the merest
>possibility that you are not now perfect, nor have you ever been (nor
>will you ever be), and that you are not now, nor have you ever been
>right.  You are made sufficiently incompetent by your subjectivity to 
>your own woes and biases that everything you touch turns to shit.  You
>are unwanted, and rightfully so.  You set yourself apart for derision 
>by your own words (if not actions), and then have the gall to complain 
>when you are attacked by others who try to live within the tight 
>confines (to you) of reality.
>				-- John Woods
>				<1992Jan7.183556.7161@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM>

and then, to top it off, you quote someone eles flame in your sig.
pathetic, simply pathetic. youve been around too long, can we
trade you to alt.romance.chat for a draft pick in hopes of
attracting some young talent to replace the aging, overrated veteran?

r


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Andy, limedicks, the Brady Brunch, and cannibalism
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Distribution: alt
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 08:47:34 GMT

In article <1jpljlINNmp9@ub.d.umn.edu>, serickso@ub.d.umn.edu (Scott Erickson) writes:

> They all like to pretend that they are so tough, so mighty, but the truth is,
> they are craven cowards who hide behind scholarships and their academic
> "studies."

And this of course means that you were in the Gulf War right Conan? No, of
course not you pansy StupidFuckWhoDoesn'tKnowAnyBetter. You proudly display
"University of Confused Thought" as you make your posting but don't fully
understand to what extent of a moron you make yourself out to be. It's amazing
how naivity sneaks by the pathetic few. And son, it has sneaked by a long time
ago. But don't fret, its undeniably genetic. Your deficientcy in
intelligence is unmistakenably reflected in your writing. Stupidity this
intense can only come from a family of assholes. I can only imagine your
Christmas pictures... that is, if that stupid bitch you've called Mommy for the
last 22 years could figure out how to use a fucking "point and shoot" camera.
"But honey, what does it mean?" Get the fuck out of here loser. People like you
who are THIS stupid really burn me. (Flame bait my boy; I dare you)

--The Phantom