HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com (Dave Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Ghostbusters - victim of violent knife attack?
Date: 30 Sep 92 13:25:37 GMT
Organization: :noitazinagrO
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Ellen Sasse (sasse@netcom.com) wrote:
: dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com (Dave Jones) writes: 
: 
: >(...) Many US TV stations complain that they would like to show
: > movies uncut, but distributors won't supply the prints.  That's
: > broadcast TV, of course: cable shows what it likes, mostly without
: > any fudging.
: 
: I don't believe that is true anymore. Even Bravo censors movies (at least
: *they* warn you about it with a brief not before they show the movie, although
: not, of course, in their previews and advertisements for upcoming shows).
: 
: For another example, USA dubs over or blanks out words as innocuous as
: "crap" at 4:00 in the morning! (They also cut out the words "birth control"
: out of the phrase "birth control pills" - can't for the life of me remember
: what movie I was watching - and various "bastard"s, "asshole"s and
: "dickhead"s).
: 
I should have said, "Pay cable" as opposed to "free" cable which comes
as part of the basic service, has commercial interruptions, and acts
just like broadcast stations do.  USA Network is a hoot: they push their
"Up All Night" programming, employ commentators who are either salacious
or bimboform, and then censor the hell out of everything they show.

Two things about the censorship strike me as crazy: the lengths they
will go to in order to do it, such as electronically enlarging the frame
to keep private parts from public view (phew, nearly dropped an 'l'
there.....), and the treatment of the all-american expletive "goddam"
which is uniformly beheaded to "_____dam".  Why is the headless form
more acceptable?

Surprised to hear that Bravo, a pay-cable arts-and-obscure-movies
channel, does censoring.  I never suscribed to it, and gave up the
other pay channels long ago on the grounds of poor content.  A recent
glimpse of Cinemax showed that they were still prepared to show nudity,
but nothing 'X' rated.  Meanwhile A&E (another "free" service) is
prepared to go a few steps out (e.g. as in "Cloning of Joanna May") but
will still wimp out if given the chance.
Xref: sparky rec.arts.tv.uk:5633 uk.misc:103
From: cmbox@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Chris)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk,uk.misc
Subject: Re: Ch4's Big Breakfast
Date: 27 Sep 92 15:15:12 GMT
Distribution: uk
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England

apj003@cck.coventry.ac.uk (James W Bottomley) writes:

>Whilst we're on the subject of sexy presenters (Ok, we weren't, but I'd 
>like to get onto it) who's the wonderful young lady who now does BBC Breakfast
>Time thingy with the guy in the suit whose name I can never remember?

Do you mean the one who has a habit of tucking the right side of her lower
lip under her teeth just before she starts to speak? I found myself watching
the rest of the programme just to see those captivating moments...

Can't remember her name though. Or his.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Chris Box  | cmbox@dcs.warwick.ac.uk , csugl@csv.warwick.ac.uk  | 
+-----------------University of Warwick, England------------------+
From: andrewc@spider.co.uk (Andrew Cannon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Eastenders Question
Date: 30 Sep 92 16:10:30 GMT
Organization: Spider Systems Limited, Edinburgh, UK.

In article <nrp.717851240@reading> nrp@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk writes:
>andrewc@spider.co.uk (Andrew Cannon) writes:
>
>>This may seem like a weird question but.....
>
>>Watching Eastenders last night gave me the strange feeling of missing an episode
>
>>My landlady also felt the same way. Mark woke up in bed next to the little
>>tart Mandy (last I saw he'd gone to visit his mother-in-law), Ian is suddenly 
>>back with his girlfriend AND trying to find money to pay back a debt I don't
>>remember him getting !
>
>>Did we miss last Thursdays episode or what ? I'm sure I watched it. Is this just
>>crap continuity (something thats never happened on Eastenders before) or have
>>they shown this Thursdays episode first ?
>
>>Am I cracking up or did anyone else notice this ?
>
>No, I noticed it too, and I KNOW I watched Thursday's episode because I
>watched TOTP (for no reason except that I was bored) beforehand!  We were
>trying to figure out what we did on Thursday...
>
>Do you think they'll show yesterday's episode tomorrow?
>

I hope so, because I want to know why Mark went to bed with Mandy ! I hope it
explains itself 
.
-- 
|      Andy Cannon       | All spelling and grammatical mistakes potrayed  |   
| Misplaced Yorkshireman | in this post are my own. Any resemblance to any |   
|   Spider Systems Ltd   | other mistakes, both living and dead, is purely |  
|  andrewc@spider.co.uk  | coincidental.                                   |
From: jeremy@castle.ed.ac.uk (JHenderson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Channel 4's Big Breakfast
Date: 28 Sep 92 12:41:59 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

All the people who wrote in advance to predict that Ch4BB would be
awful should have waited - now they know that it is *indescribably*
awful.

-- 
=======Jeremy Henderson========jeremy@castle.ed.ac.uk===============
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
From: nur@dgbt.doc.ca (Nur Serinken)
Subject: Re: I want Mr. Bean! And I'll kill to get it!
Organization: The Communications Research Centre
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 16:57:46 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.050027.2360@zooid.guild.org> Adam Lawrence Salter <adam@zooid.guild.org> writes:
>In article <1992Sep28.004405.22577@emr1.emr.ca>, lskinner@emr1.emr.ca (Lauren Skinner) writes:
>>In article <717572439.2325@zooid.guild.org> adam@zooid.guild.org (Adam Lawrence 
>>pre-empted by football.  *ARGGHHH!!!*
>>
>>Why can't the CBC stagger their programming for a stinking 10 minutes?
>

You can see Mr. Bean tonight at 7 pm in Ottawa on cable ch 11. (West of Ottawa)
It is the French CBC channel but they broadcast Mr. Bean in English with
French subtitles. This  series is few episodes behind the CBC English channel.

The French channel will show the football mugged episode in a few weeks.



-- 
Nur  Serinken       | Communications Research Centre -DRL
		    | PO Box 11490 Stn "H"
                    | Ottawa, ON K2H 8S2
Voice-(613) 998-2289| Canada
Xref: sparky rec.arts.tv.uk:5651 uk.misc:107
From: woody@udcf.glasgow.ac.uk (Ian Woodrow)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk,uk.misc
Subject: Re: Music from advert..
Date: 29 Sep 92 08:03:03 GMT
Organization: Glasgow University Computing Service

simpsong@dns0.bham.ac.uk (Glyn Simpson) writes:

>Ok, quick question - someone out there must know the answer. I'm after the
>name of the piece of music used in the diamonds advert - the one which has
>shadowy figures and bright diamonds being placed on hands, ears and necks.

My friend has written to the TV station in the past for info on theme music
to ads, documentaries etc.  They have always replied and been very helpful.


-- 
W@@DY_______________________________________________________________________
 /Ian Woodrow, Computing Service, Uni of Glasgow, GLASGOW G12 8QQ, Scotland \
*  <Dog 'n' Bone:  041-330-4800         | e-mail: woody@udcf.gla.ac.uk>      *
 \__________ FAX:__041-330-4808_____________________________________________/
From: imc@comlab.ox.ac.uk (Ian Collier)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: UK TV Charts for 31 August-6 September 1992
Date: 29 Sep 92 15:53:55 GMT
Organization: Oxford University Computing Laboratory, UK
X-Local-Date: Tuesday, 29th September 1992 at 4:53pm BST
Originator: imc@msc2.comlab

This week "TV Hell" takes up six places on BBC2 (lines marked "TVH").  Also,
contrary to the usual policy, the same programme ("The Great LA Earthquake",
and I have no idea what sort of a programme that was) gets two places on
BBC1, and "The Bill" gets two places on ITV.  I think someone made a
cock-up...

   BBC1                          millions  BBC2                      millions
 1 EastEnders(Thu/Sun)              19.26  The Travel Show               5.37
 2 Neighbours(Wed)                  16.49  TVH: Rock Bottom              4.91
 3 Birds of a Feather               12.33  TVH: Hello and Goodbye        4.71
 4 E.T.                             11.45  Star Trek                     4.66
 5 Keeping Up Appearances           10.75  Ps and Qs                     4.03
 6 Porridge                         10.27  TVH: It's a Knockout          4.00
 7 The Great LA Earthquake(Wed)      9.99  TVH: Official History of Hell 3.94
 8 News and Weather(Sun)             9.94  TVH: Nul Points               3.87
 9 The Great LA Earthquake(Tue)      9.72  TVH: Critics' Choice          3.77
10 The House of Eliott               9.68  The Living Planet             3.67

   ITV                                     Channel 4
 1 Coronation Street(Wed/Sun)       19.43  Brookside(Wed/Sat)            5.30
 2 Home and Away(Wed)               14.17  Nurses                        3.99
 3 The Bill(Tue)                    13.97  The Cosby Show                3.71
 4 Diana - the End of a FairyTale?  13.62  Countdown(Wed)                3.52
 5 10 Years of Alright on the Night 12.06  The Golden Girls              2.97
 6 The Bill(Thu)                    11.89  Football Italia               2.92
 7 Predator                         11.43  Roseanne                      2.86
 8 Take Your Pick       (joint 7th) 11.43  Check Out 92                  2.53
 9 The Trouble with Mr Bean         11.38  Sleuth                        2.52
10 The Darling Buds of May          11.32  Little House on the Prairie   2.50
 
This chart is taken from the new issue of the Radio Times; the information
originally came from the BARB. Permission was not obtained from either
authority. When more than one episode is broadcast in a week, the highest
figure is given, and in this case the day(s) on which the maximum
occurred is(are) stated. If a programme is repeated the audiences for the
first and repeat broadcasts are added together.


Ian Collier
Ian.Collier@prg.ox.ac.uk | imc@ecs.ox.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
From: imc@comlab.ox.ac.uk (Ian Collier)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Ghostbusters - victim of violent knife attack?
Date: 29 Sep 92 14:59:18 GMT
Organization: Oxford University Computing Laboratory, UK
X-Local-Date: Tuesday, 29th September 1992 at 3:58pm BST
Originator: imc@msc2.comlab

In article <1992Sep29.083739@axion.bt.co.uk>, djenkins@axion.bt.co.uk (David Jenkins) wrote:

>In article <5867@mccuts.uts.mcc.ac.uk>, zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk (Geoff
>Lane) writes:
>|> Am I alone in thinking that Ghostbusters broadcast the other night was
>|> somewhat hacked about? 

>Also, did anyone else notice that Crocodile Dundee II was cut as well,
>apparently just for the sake of timing?  In particular the scene where
>he's delivering stationary to a firm in a high-rise office, sees a man
>about to jump from the ledge, and goes and rescues him - the crazy thing
>is, they showed it in the trailers!

Well that's where they got it from, you see: they had to cut it out of the
film in order to make a trailer out of it. :-)

Y'know I saw in the credits a chap called "Suicide man" and I hadn't the
faintest idea what it was going on about.

While on this subject... the Witches of Eastwick seemed to be rather cut up
as well, in spite of being after 9pm.  I haven't seen the original so I
don't know if any scenes were cut - though there did seem to be a gap in
continuity part way through.  Also, there was a scene where Jack Nicholson's
mouth started going at a completely different speed than his voice, and his
head suddenly jumped several centimetres.

Ian Collier
Ian.Collier@prg.ox.ac.uk | imc@ecs.ox.ac.uk
From: dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com (Dave Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: A Question of Attribution
Date: 5 Oct 92 21:46:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: pixel.1992Oct5.214637.16738
Organization: :noitazinagrO
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

The above drama, with James Fox as Sir Anthony Blunt, ran last night as
this week's Masterpiece Theatre on PBS.  Fascinating, if a little
pointless in overall plot.  Prunella Scales pulled off a tour de force
as Her Majesty Brenda, marking the first time anyone has even attempted
her as a character.  The Maurice Oldfield thing was obliquely hinted at
thru the secret meetings between Blunt and his interrogator's boss, but
to no apparent end.  Alan Bennett and James Fox got to do talking head
bits at the end, and AB chucked in some "spies may be a good thing after
all" sentiments, which host Alistair Cooke made sure to rebut with all the
forceful urbanity of which he is capable.

So how was this received in the UK?  Has Pru dashed her chance at an
MBE?

--
||)) There is no truth to the rumor that:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))|
||)) Lotus are suing Apple for copying the look and feel of their lawsuits )|
||))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))|
||Dave Jones (dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com) | Eastman Kodak Co. Rochester, NY   |
From: sasse@netcom.com (Ellen Sasse)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Ghostbusters - victim of violent knife attack?
Date: 29 Sep 92 23:38:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: netcom.h4+p0_a.sasse
Organization: Netcom

dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com (Dave Jones) writes: 

>(...) Many US TV stations complain that they would like to show
> movies uncut, but distributors won't supply the prints.  That's
> broadcast TV, of course: cable shows what it likes, mostly without
> any fudging.

I don't believe that is true anymore. Even Bravo censors movies (at least
*they* warn you about it with a brief not before they show the movie, although
not, of course, in their previews and advertisements for upcoming shows).

For another example, USA dubs over or blanks out words as innocuous as
"crap" at 4:00 in the morning! (They also cut out the words "birth control"
out of the phrase "birth control pills" - can't for the life of me remember
what movie I was watching - and various "bastard"s, "asshole"s and
"dickhead"s).

So it looks as though I am going to have to stop watching movies on cable
tv as well (I already stopped watching movies on networks a long time ago)

> So have the Maggot and her cronies done their worst and reversed decades
> of liberalization?  The mind boggles.

Seems to have happened here in the states too, by vocal fundie minorities.
Sigh. Sometimes it seems like I should abort my career plans and dedicate
my life to social activism as the anti-Wildmon. But then, I have more
of a life than he does, and I don't think I'm quite ready to give it up.
Xref: sparky rec.arts.tv.uk:5634 uk.misc:105
From: nrp@csug3.cs.reading.ac.uk ("Educated bags" Neilski)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk,uk.misc
Subject: Re: Ch4's Big Breakfast
Date: 28 Sep 92 13:35:00 GMT
Reply-To: nrp@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk
Distribution: uk
Organization: University of Reading

Well, I caught 10 minutes of the Big Breakfast this morning and I'd like to
announce that I shall be sticking to the radio.

Although the bloke talking about toilet paper was quite interesting...

(so THAT's what happened to Chris Evans!)

-- neilski

-- 
nrp@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk  \--------------------------------------------------
----------------------------\ Woke up this morning, out of bed I leaped,
Banged my head on the ceiling and I went straight back to sleep...   -- Dylan
From: Robert.Turner@brunel.ac.uk (Robert Turner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: UK TV Charts for 31 August-6 September 1992
Date: 4 Oct 92 13:34:20 GMT
Organization: Brunel University, West London, UK

imc@comlab.ox.ac.uk (Ian Collier) writes:
%                                           TVH: Critics' Choice          3.77

Is this the highest rating for Triangle ?

R


-- 
 _________________________________________________________________________
/                            |                                            \
|   Rob Turner, PC Support   |     email : Robert.Turner@brunel.ac.uk     |
|   Brunel University        |                                            |
|   London, England          |        Confusion....  my speciality        |
\____________________________|____________________________________________/
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
From: andy@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Andy Clews)
Subject: Re: A Question of Attribution
Organization: University of Sussex
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 12:50:46 GMT

dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com (Dave Jones) writes:
: The above drama, with James Fox as Sir Anthony Blunt, ran last night as
: this week's Masterpiece Theatre on PBS.  Fascinating, if a little
: pointless in overall plot.  Prunella Scales pulled off a tour de force
: as Her Majesty Brenda, [....]
: [...]
: So how was this received in the UK?  Has Pru dashed her chance at an
: MBE?

As far as I know it was very well received, enough so to be repeated
recently. I for one enjoyed it, and I too thought Pru Scales as Her Maj was
brilliant. I wonder what HM herself thought of it (she *must* have watched
it, surely).

Whilst we're talking about James Fox, has anyone Stateside seen
"Quartermaine's Terms" which stars James's brother Edward as Quartermaine, a
rather dusty old college lecturer? A very enjoyable play IMHO. Last seen on
BBC two or three years ago.


-- 
Andy Clews, Computing Service, Univ. of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, England
JANET: andy@uk.ac.sussex.syma      OTHER NETWORKS: andy@syma.sussex.ac.uk

Xref: sparky rec.arts.tv.uk:5712 uk.misc:124
From: dhd@exnet.co.uk (Damon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk,uk.misc
Subject: Re: Ch4's Big Breakfast
Date: 2 Oct 92 09:26:31 GMT
Distribution: uk
Organization: ExNet Systems Ltd Public Access News, London, UK

In article <1992Oct1.141430.7395@chemeng.ed.ac.uk> eric@chemeng.ed.ac.uk (Eric S Fraga) writes:
>The longer I am in this country, the more I see it sliding
>towards the US (and Canada and other places) in terms of culture,
>especially with regards to TV.  Very sad indeed.  I used to tell
>everybody back home about how great the TV here was... won't be
>true much longer at the rate things are going.

This is true.  More, the licensors should realise, is not better.

Damon
-- 
Damon Hart-Davis | Tel/Fax: +44 81 755 0077 |1.24|| Cheap Sun eqpt available.
Internet: dhd@exnet.co.uk | Also: Damon@ed.ac.uk || US high-perf motor groups.
--------------------------+----------------------++ >12 mail&news polls / day.
Public access UNIX (Suns), news and mail for #5 per month.  FIRST MONTH FREE.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
From: gschlesi@scott.skidmore.edu (gabriel schlesinger)
Subject: Blake's 7
Organization: Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs NY
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 22:55:24 GMT

Does anybody remember the show Blake's 7.  I had last seen it on PBS
about four years ago, and had only caught the last few episodes (when
there were only 5 and Blake was no longer on the show).  I'm curious
if there are any tapes of it around or if any of the PBS stations are
showing it again.  (I know it was cheesy but it was kind of fun).
From: nrp@csug3.cs.reading.ac.uk ("Educated bags" Neilski)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Eastenders - what happened?
Date: 2 Oct 92 08:33:44 GMT
Reply-To: nrp@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk
Organization: University of Reading

Well, it looks to me as if either the BBC forgot to broadcast an episode
and decided to carry on regardless, or forgot to tell one of the
scriptwriters what had or had not been going on.  Anyone got any more info?

-- neilski

-- 
nrp@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk  \--------------------------------------------------
----------------------------\ "This is a Ming vase."  "Why is it called
Ming?"  The Bursar tapped the vase.  It went *ming*.   -- Moving Pictures
From: sgs3@po.CWRU.Edu (Sharon G. Scinicariello)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: House of Elliot on A&E
Date: 4 Oct 1992 03:50:22 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: sgs3@po.CWRU.Edu (Sharon G. Scinicariello)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc12.ins.cwru.edu


We here in the States are a bit behind, we think.  

Can anyone tell us:

1) how many episodes of the House of Elliot are there (we're on 14 this week)?

2) who does Evie end up sleeping with?

3) did Jack just make the mistake of his life marrying Bea?

4) does anyone really care about the dress-making part of this series?


Since we don't check Usenet very often, answers to either sxm23@po.cwru.edu
or sgs3@po.cwru.edu would be appreciated.

Thanks for your help. 
-- 
Sharon G. Scinicariello
Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, CWRU
sgs3@po.cwru.edu
From: proberts@informix.com (Paul Roberts)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Brit Shows:  Tape 6 Episodes and Then...?
Date: 6 Oct 92 06:04:26 GMT
Organization: Informix Software, Inc.

In article <1992Oct5.191927.26204@mercury.cair.du.edu> kguinn@zephyr.cair.du.edu (Kip J. Guinn) writes:
>
>What confuses me is:  what do British networks do with all the weeks
>after the first 6?  Putting up a new show at the beginning of the
>season, running it for six weeks, and then...?  Awful lot of TV
>season left, isn't there?
>
>Kip

We don't have this bizarre notion of a "TV season" (well, there are
a lot of repeats during the summer, but other than that..)

The BBC seems to strive to put on 6 weeks of something good, then
six weeks of something else good, etc (used to be the case. I hear
it has gone downhill in my absense). Anyway, there is nothing magic
about 6. "I, Claudius" was 13 episodes, "The Jewel in the Crown" (ITV?)
was 14 (I think). Although neither of these can really be compared
with anything made by American networks, can they?

Another narrow conception that British TV isn't limited by:
that all programs must begin and end on an hour or half hour.

Paul
From: ljc@otter.hpl.hp.com (Lee Carter)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 09:52:21 GMT
Subject: Re: Ghostbusters - victim of violent knife attack?
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk

In rec.arts.tv.uk, zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk (Geoff Lane) writes:


> Am I alone in thinking that Ghostbusters broadcast the other night was
> somewhat hacked about?  There were a number of violent jumps in continuity
> and the fade outs for commercials seem to have been inserted at random -
> sometimes not even allowing a character to finish a sentence.

> -- 
> Geoff. Lane. | Internet: zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk | Janet: zzassgl@uk.ac.mcc.uts
> UTS Sys Admin,  Manchester Computing Centre,  Oxford Rd,  Manchester, M13 9PL
> I'm too sexy for my .sig

Yes! Absolutely!
This poor film was hacked to pieces, I mean, was it edited by a chimp
or something? Some bits were probably removed to cover the infamous
nine-o-clock watershed, but really - "This man has no twinky" ?!?
Yes. A total hatchet job. I was disgusted.

Lee.
From: jon@ccl.umist.ac.uk (Jon Wells)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Ghostbusters - victim of violent knife attack?
Date: 30 Sep 92 12:17:24 GMT
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre

In <1992Sep29.083739@axion.bt.co.uk> djenkins@axion.bt.co.uk (David Jenkins) writes:

Ghostbusters.......

>No, not somewhat hacked about ... brutally murdered a la Pyscho shower scene!


The bit that annoyed me most was the scene in the mayor's office where one
of the GBs (Bill Murray?) says (about Peck) 'This man has no dick!'. By far
the funniest line of the film NORMALLY. What does good old ITV give us
instead? 'This man has no TWINKIE'. Following that, of course, the word
dick is used, but I forget the exact quote. WHY do they bother? It isn't
exactly the most offensive word in the world. The implication is exactly
the same, anyhow. AND they cut the bit at the start (ish) with the library
ghost. Coupled with the appallingly bad advert breaks, it ruined the film.

And as for Commando, well, what more can I say? The cutting/editing was
trash.

Dear ITV

	Get your fuc... (oops - I can't say that) damn (?) act together.

yous pis... (not-very-happy)


Jon

Jon Wells
University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
Language & Linguistics Dept.
Tel: +44 61 200 3108
Fax: +44 61 200 3099
e-mail: jon@ccl.umist.ac.uk
snail-mail: Jon Wells, Dept. of Lang. and Ling., UMIST, POBox 88, Sackville
Street, Manchester, M60 1QD

-----

Life? Don't talk to me about LIFE!!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.uk