HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Cast about for ego-food your votes
Summary: So who's THIS androgynous twit Leah?
Keywords: COZ I WANT TO
Date: 17 Nov 92 00:47:59 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <1992Nov15.234949.1@opie.bgsu.edu> bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:
>
>    [ nothing much worth flaming ]
>
>        Oooooh!  I'm swooning!   What a *MAN*!  Pick on someone your
>        own size, motherfucker (and don't tell me there is nobody, coz
>        you're nothing but a stunted little egoist like Ross perot).

Can't you even think up your own insults?  Must you plagiarize your hero
Troll for material?  I'll be happy to pick on you if you give me something
worth flaming.

>
>       WHO IN THE MOTHERFUCKING HELL ARE YOU TO DECLARE WHAT GODDAMNED
>       WORDS WE CAN USE, SHITHEAD?!?!  YOU STUPID-ASS PIECE OF SHIT
>       SELF-AGGRANDIZING TEXAN COW FUCKER!  COUNT THESE OBSCENITIES,
>       PRETTY BOY PIMP FODDER VENEREAL WART!
>
>  >-- Andy
>
>--Leah

*yawn*  Why I'm Andy, that's who...  and I didn't say you couldn't use
those new words you learned today, just that it's the most boring, lame,
cop-out form of flaming there is.  Any junior high punk can do this. 
Your post attests to this fact.

BUT, since you like dirty words and I happen to have an extensive 
vocabulary of them, I'll reply to you JUST THIS ONCE with language you
can understand, OK?  In the future, you'll have to be more creative.

AND JUST WHO THE FUCKING, COCK-SLIMING HELL ARE *YOU*, SHE-MAN?  IF SPOUTING
OBSCENITIES LIKE THESE ARE THE BEST YOU CAN DO, YOU MORONIC, PRE-PUBESCENT,
WORTHLESS, DUNG BEETLE, THEN CARRY YOUR PIMPLY, HEMMORHOIDIC, CHICKEN-SHIT
ASS OFF TO ALT.SCHOOLYARD.TRASH.  INSTEAD OF BORING ME WITH THIS TRIPE WHY
DON'T YOU GO STICK YOUR FECUND NOSE INTO SOMEBODY ELSE'S LIFE, YOU 
HERMAPHRODITIC, PUSS-SUCKING, PENCIL NECKED GEEK?  NOW RUN ALONG BACK TO 
YOUR MOTHER AND SUCK HER OOZING, DISEASED PAPS FOR COMFORT, YOU OBNOXIOUS
LITTLE FART-VAPOR!

Ah.  Now run along little boy/girl/whatever.  Don't bother me again
unless you have something of consequence to say.

-- Andy

P.S.  Get off Opie.  He don't like it much.
From: krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Date: 22 Nov 92 16:28:48 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1ejlt5INN19l@interceptor.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@interceptor.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>
>In article <Bxz6qr.CCF@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@aquamarine.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>
>>It appears as if Tilden, The Wonder Dung, is incapable of accepting his
>>error. K e n told you that K e n is correct, and you haven't been able
>>to prove K e n wrong. Tilden, your only embarrassing yourself. You better
>>cease posting until you have recovered from your utter defeat.
>>
>>And please keep your lines under 80 characters. Your idiocy is amazing.
>>Remember to think next time, for you will only make a fool of yourself
>>if you do otherwise.
>
>Fuck you. You aren't my guardian, you are nothing. And stop talking about this 
>K E N guy, and talk about yourself.

K e n has never claimed to be anyone's guardian, thus you seem to be
quite misinformed. K e n is not nothing. K e n is K e n. And further,
K e n talks about K e n because K e n is K e n and K e n is himself, thus
all references made by K e n to K e n, is simply K e n referring to
K e n, or K e n referring to himself.

Please do not be so hysterical and paranoid. It is quite apparent that
you are buckling under pressure. You should cease posting and attend
a short vacation away from the terminal. It is quite apparent that you
are incapable of handling simple conversations and situations on this
newsgroup. Just accept the fact that you were in error, and you will
relieve yourself of this horrid pressure.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: Mic.Oettinger@launchpad.unc.edu (Mic Oettinger)
Subject: AAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
Summary: just useless shit 
Keywords: junk, shit, trash, blah blah blah...
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:11:57 GMT

you dont have to read this. i just need to vent some frustration.

why is everybody always getting on my ass? what did i ever do to fuckin
deserve this shit? Men suck, and so do you i'm sure! There are too many
stupid fuckin assholes out there and i am tired of it. They should all be
stricken with stupid-fuckup virus. Yes, that is what you all need, to be
punished for being so damn useless.

useless. god. i mean, really. god.

Mo


--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: tmurphy@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Tricia L Murphy)
Subject: test
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 20:48:55 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Troll, you still are a dumb fuck!
From: SOCC9241430E@LUST.LATROBE.EDU.AU (Chris)
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 04:13:15 GMT
 <1992Nov5.150650.17013@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Nov9.090826.22169@latcs1.lat.oz.au> <1992Nov13.154618.1@jaguar.uofs.edu>
Organization: La Trobe University
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

In <1992Nov13.154618.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:

> In article <1992Nov9.090826.22169@latcs1.lat.oz.au>, ooi@latcs5.lat.oz.au (Jeffrey K Ooi) writes:
> > At least I have a signature!
> > 
> > Which is more than I can say about Mr Aussie hater here, or do you prefer
> > the occasional Rodney King riot or two hmmm?  This country must be too boring 
> > for you!
> 
> *    	Just a peak at that little slice of heaven in the South Pacific . . .
> 
> Of course there are no riots in Australia where the white CRIMINAL settlers of
> the island managed to eradicate enough of the indigenous *black* population.

Well Mr Slavetrading parasite, it is good to see "CRIMINAL" line being used
again, good to see you stick to the same tact!  If you knew anything like you
make out, you would know that it is true that the aborigine does indeed live 
in poverty, but the living standard is much higher than your lovely ghettos.
And does your government give a shit about them??? NO!!!!  As long as your
model citizens like Mr Perot have their billions, the govt is happy!

> This, paired along side the fact that their human and political rights aren't
> protected either, naturally yields that there is no uprising from such a small,
> downtrodden, group.  Kick any of the Gagaju tribesmen around t'day, mate?
> Probably not, since there are only FOUR left . . . and their hiding in a  
> weedpatch on the last little bit of outback you haven't STOLEN from them.

And what of many indian tribes???  Good to see heaps of Navaho's around!  I
am glad that your great nation protects the rights of the indigenous people.
As for theft.....where did New Mexico come from??  And California, surely 
you didnt steal them?  *grin*
 
> Go throw your holier than thou attitude on the barbie with the shrimp and
> realize that the 17 million of you are descendants of criminals (which has
> distinct implications if criminal activity is a genetic product) still bereft
> on your little, mostly desert, island.  In the big scheme of things, you are
> are as a tick, on a flea's dick.

Well, I think that your slaving ancestors would be unhappy with your Vietnam
escapade and as for the Bay of Pigs????  However, I am sure that the well-liked
and respected Troll, whose intellict is unquestionable *guffaws of laughter*
is always right.  But still, open your eyes, you nor your country is
infallible.  This isnt an anti-yank woof, but rather an anti-wank..err..Troll
woof.
 
> 
>                                      Troll of America

Chris from downuder.......
		...what day is it in the mighty USA?  Yesterday...
		   ....what does this mean oh mighty Troll?....
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re:    pay for tv
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:37:42 GMT

> <BWUNSCHE@HARPERVM.BITNET> writes:
>i guess you clowns dont get it , sorry about that !!!!

well, mr. BWUNSCHE@HARPERVM.BITNET, first off, can I call you BWUNSCE for
short? Secondly, it is a vioaltion of sanitarium rules for you to use
electronic mail, even if your account still remains open. You will be
administered the dreaded enema/shcok therapy treatment in order to
calm you down about.

-Nurse Rachet
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:56:25 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
: In article <1449@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>, libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
:  
: > 1) If George Bush was not suggesting that atheists are in some way
: > inferior U.S. citizens, and perhaps should not be considered
: > citizens at all, then WHAT WAS he saying?  What sort of code was he
: > using?
: 
: Well at least you are asking questions, which allows us to show you your own
: ignorance. "What was he saying" It appears to me that President Bush did not
: know how he felt about Atheists. He clearly believes that the United States is
: a religiously minded nation, lo and behold he is correct. He also firmly stated
: that he was for the seperation of Church and State, believing that the majority
: of Americans did as well, lo and behold they do. Hmm. If the majority of the
: United States professes a belief in God, and yet there must exist a seperation
: of this religion, well then, it seems to be a reasonable question to ask "what
: then are atheists?" It is the sort of acedemic reasoning that plagues our
: highest tribunal "When does life start..." etc. The President seems to have
: remained very consistant with the rest of acedemic government in his
: ponderings.
: 
No, no- he wasn't asking "What then are atheists," and he wasn't
discussing how he, personally, felt about atheists.  He was
stating, as president of the United States, that atheists were not
patriots and that he wasn't certain they should be citizens.
Considering that even the most restrictive interpretation of the
First Amendment would have to concede that it forbids *ANY*
religious test for citizenship, this seems a very odd thing indeed
for the man entrusted with the defense of the constitution to be
saying.  

The answer to your question is: Atheists are people who don't
believe in God.  This has no implications for their citizenship, 
their patriotism, or their honorable character.  
:  
: > Please either answer these questions or shutup and stop annoying
: > people with your young-republican inanities.
: 
: I find it very strange that you use this. Now, to shift the burden of proof,
: can you Billy Boy, without mindlessly insulting the President, intelligently
: prove the substance of your arguement? To coin a Court phrase "the literary or
: artistic merit to society" that your point may have. I ask you to consider it in
: this remonstration: Bush has lost, so... what is your point? Anything that he
: has said about miniscule details regarding his own convictions, in light of the
: election, are now moot. You have made an interesting accousation, now can you
: swallow your own pill? (I suspect you swallow quite well)
: 
What pill am I supposed to be swallowing, Ghost Boy?  I've made my
point repeatedly, only to have you and Willy consistently evade it.
 I'm not sure what *you're* point is about Georgie being out of
 office; do you feel that the events of the past four years are now
 closed to discussion?  Then why are you discussing them?
 
 Bill
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 18 Nov 92 02:24:31 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
: In article <1427@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>, libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
: > Oh, Willy.  Willy, my lad, I have to conclude that you are
: > impenetrably stupid.  If it will make you happy, I will publically
: > admit that the Bush quote was not word-for-word what was posted;
: >  only the meaning was the same.  Since you haven't been able to 
: >  come up with any alternative meaning which might make this 
: >  conversation worthwhile, why don't you just sink back into your
: >  ditto-head torpor and let the grown-ups finish supper?
: >  Bill
: 
: Ok wilbur you SnivelingSadoSelfEroticisit how about you cite some sources, the
: article, the author, the paper, or if you saw it on T.V. (as if you can read a
: paper) give the date, the interviewer, the station and the time of the
: interview. You claim to have cited it word for word, so it should be easy for
: you to reply. Right?
: 
: --The Phantom        

Oh, you again- I thought you went off somewhere to have your
silly-ass name changed..        

Am I to understand that you are now arguing, you ridiculous tool,
that Georgie never said ANYTHING on this topic?  Cripes, caped
crusader, even Willy isn't claiming that.  Go back and read the 
articles, and come back when you have acquired a clue...
Oh, and incidentally, Mased Marvel, I never claimed to have quoted
anybody exactly; I stated explicitly that I was paraphrasing.
Somebody who posted before me had the exact quote, and gave
sources.  I suppose I was expecting to much, thinking you'd
actually read a thread before flaming it.  .
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: lstewart@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca (L. Stewart -- IS Office 1058)
Subject: Re: To shitCANada and the Kanucks.
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 23:29:49 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.105025.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>
>	This is just a little reply to the fucking Canadian Kanuck who was
>badmouthing the Constitution as a lovely piece of vellum and not a working
>government like Canada's *ha ha ha*
>
>Well Kanuck, at least my country isn't so dependent on foreign investment like
>your leech nation.  I'd hate to see what all of you Kanucks will be doing if GM
>goes out of business, since half of Canada is employed by the U.S. auto
>industry.  Perhaps you could cut down all of your forests and save our spotted
>owl or become the Western hemisphere's biggest ice peddlers.
>
>				Troll of America

Dear Spooge,
Indeed the American Constitution is a wonderful document and 
extends the liberal spirit of the revolution to a fixed set
of legal, social and political concepts. My post was in reference
to an article stating that Canada has no constitution. Canada has
the repatriated British Norh America act as a constitution. This 
document is not as yet fully ratified by all of the provinces.
The other point of my post was that though the US constitution is
a singular and magnificent work it is generally used as a         
platitudinous launching point for the most venal creature known
to the planet, American politicians. You poor suckling deprived
goat, you were raised on the pledge of allegiance and the myth
of old glory and infallability, apple pie and hemorrhoid relief.
What is left of the American automobile industry has pulled most of    
its interests out of Canada all ready and soon a poor dork like you
will have to suck long and hard before you get any maple syrup.
Canada has one great failing that being an amorphous cultural
identity. 

At any rate Troll you are a cipher, less than a speck. Please take
the earliest opportunity to throw yourself bodily into the path
of the nearest oncoming vehicle. 











Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: K e n Informs Liz As To The Purpose Of A Penis (was Re: K e n Informs Mr. Cress)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:37:01 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.190557.17641@tdb.uu.se> t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:
>Kenneth J Robinson (krobinso@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu) wrote:
>: 
>: No, K e n only uses fingers for such activities. K e n uses K e n's
>: penis for other activities, which is not a topic of discussion. A penis
>: was not designed for typing. It's main purpose is copulation. The arousal
>:
>Come on, K e n, what other activities, beside ITS main purpose - copulating -
>are you referring to. I'm impressed, though, that you copulate more often
>than you take a piss, and still have time to tell people about it on the net.

K e n says that this is not a topic for discussion, thus K e n will
not discuss it. This is a family-oriented newsgroup.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: AAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 18 Nov 92 14:49:19 GMT
Organization: University of Northern Indiana

In article <1992Nov17.211157.7779@samba.oit.unc.edu>, Mic.Oettinger@launchpad.unc.edu (Mic Oettinger) writes:
>you dont have to read this. i just need to vent some frustration.

I'm here for you.

>why is everybody always getting on my ass? what did i ever do to fuckin
>deserve this shit? Men suck, and so do you i'm sure! There are too many
>stupid fuckin assholes out there and i am tired of it. They should all be
>stricken with stupid-fuckup virus. Yes, that is what you all need, to be
>punished for being so damn useless.

You may be suffering from schizophrenia.  You see a schizophrenic has a
hard time abstracting meaning from his/her environment when such meaning
is not explicitly obvious.  Things like computers present no problem
because their behavior is subject to rules which can be explicitly
stated, but people on the other hand, and personal interaction, are 
governed by rules and conventions which are not obvious and which are
never presented explicitly.  Thus the behavior of those around him/her
is always a mystery to the schizophrenic.  The response to this is
confusion which is often rationalized as "everyone but me is stupid"
or "everyone is out to get me."

>useless. god. i mean, really. god.

Here is a test for schizophrenia:
What do the following mean?

1) A rolling stone gathers no moss.

2) People who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

3) Still waters run deep.

>Mo
>

Of course it may just be that bit about oobe's at some bizarre "college"
in Iowa.

Melvin M. Gladstone
Xref: sparky alt.flame:15028 soc.culture.canada:8752
From: kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu (Theodore A. Kaldis)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,soc.culture.canada
Subject: Re: REAL CANADIAN HISTORY FOR AMERICANS
Date: 22 Nov 92 13:15:38 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <1992Nov16.145703.1@uwovax.uwo.ca> 4224_5201@uwovax.uwo.ca (Dark Lord of the Sith) writes:

> God bless Thomas Jefferson.  He knew that less government was better
> government, and the government that was closest to the people serves
> them better.  Is it any wonder Canada is so fucked up?

Hear, hear!
-- 
The views expressed herein are my   ||  Theodore A. Kaldis
my own only.  Do you seriously      ||  kaldis@remus.rutgers.edu
believe that a major university as  ||  {...}!rutgers!remus.rutgers.edu!kaldis
this would hold such views???       ||
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: American pratt.
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 19:34:53 GMT

In article <974@dsbc.icl.co.uk> kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:

>No that's not clear, you arsehole.  Did you read my post or are you
>just too wound up.  Listen, you flag-waving, halfwit, lame-brained
>bastard.  The point you were attempting to reply to actually points
>out that your fucking constition only deals with religious equality.
>
>Contradicting that statement with one that proves the point only shows
>what an arse-licker you really are.  Does quoting your goddamned
>constitution give you are hard-on or somthing.

no, no smeg-for-brains. My point is that the constitution does NOT
provide for religious equality. no way. no how. 

"your fucking contitution only deals with religious equality".
what a devestating argument. why, i think supreme court justices
have used this very phrase in deciding important cases.

again, i was right--the constitution does not garuntee religious equality,
and you--worthless limey shit sucker---were wrong. Quoting the constitution
does not give me a hard on, BTW. I just figured that since your post showed
0 knowledge of the US Constitution or the amendments attatched to it, that
quoting it mught help you see how wrong you are. but instead, you 
immediately start spouting "hard on! flag waver! " and other mindless
prattle to distract from the fact that you have no idea what the
fuck you are talking about.

do you have hard ons on your mind for some reason?
From: liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: CD singles WANTED
Date: 24 Nov 1992 03:37:51 GMT
Organization: WPI - so much stress we're giving it away!
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <1992Nov23.061844.13879@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> 
rperkins@astro.as.arizona.edu (Rachel J. Perkins) writes:
>
>and dean's address was in his sig.. sheesh. methinks he's jealous 'cause
>he's definitely not one of us...and for more jealousy, check out lizzy
>darling's griping on alt.flame...
>

Oh yes, Rachel DaHling, I am jealous.  I'm so jealous that I am not a
member of your insignificant, elitist and totally miniscule little
group known as the 'Inner Circle'.  We are all so very painfully
aware of the immense power that alt.fan.warlord cliques have in the
real world, don't we?

Give me an industrial size break.  When you return to reality, Rachel
DaHling, give me a ring.  You'll be in need of a clue.


					--Liz


--
my ego ate my ever lovely .sig and Eagles quote
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: K e n Needs No Macros (was Re: Information needed)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:31:16 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.150912.13749@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>In article <By10IG.62J@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>tell us, k e n, since you use this phrase verbatim in so many of your posts,
>>>do you have a macro for it? or maybe a whole set?
>>>
>>>Alt 1 K e n is K e n, and you are misinformed
>>>
>>>Alt 2 Initiate standard washing procedures
>>>
>>>Alt 3 K e n is K e n, and therefore K e n cannot be boring
>>
>>K e n has no use for macros such as these, for they are useless and
>>irrelevant, sort of like yourself.
>
>K e n, these please answer this question:
>
>Why do you repeat so many phrases verbatim in so many posts? Is it because
>your vocabulary is insufficient to allow you to use different verbal
>structures to express similar ideas?

K e n uses terms which K e n feels will benefit the understanding of
lower lifeforms with very limited intelligence. Repetition tends to
result when individuals continue asking K e n the same questions over
and over, or they continue referring to K e n and K e n's activities
as something which K e n is not and does not do.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC)
Subject: Re: samant babbles
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 01:52:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.095558.26898@midway.uchicago.edu> samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar Samant) writes:
>[prattle deleted]


Tushar...Tushar...no, doesn't ring a bell.  I thought about this and then I
remembered.  I went to high school with a girl named Tushar.  The last
time I saw her, she was working at a 7-11 in Prince Georges county in
Maryland.  She said: "All out coke slurpee".  When was the last time you
worked at a 7-11?  Be honest Tushar.


TTFN,
M 
Newsgroups: alt.flame