From: patrick@is.rice.edu (That's MISTER Patrick L. Humphrey to you, Steve.)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: NEXT: PatricKKK Harumphrey
Date: 8 Sep 1992 19:23:09 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Nowhere Steve will ever be admitted, that's for sure.

In article <1992Sep8.151810.9463@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu (Steve Chaney : Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.0) writes:
>
>Yup, this is another one of those "Hit 'n' if you want to avoid seeing me
>kicking a little dirt in pro-aborts' faces.

How about if we want to see you act like the little psychopath you are on
the net?  (I guess I'll just have to hit the ol' space bar, in that case.)

>This is some rampant verbal abuse for one of the most rampant verbally
>abusive and racist, and actually powerful, butt-heads on USENET - PatricKKK
>L. (short for Liar) Harumphrey. He is probably the most relentless and
>pointedly hard-shooting enemy I've had on USENET, worse than the loudmouth
>Mark Kaufman or the pot-shot-taking Susan Garvin, and CERTAINLY, the
>one most focused on shooting me down - or helping me shoot myself down.
>Both such efforts of his, have failed. This is the story, folks. 

Abusive?  racist?  *powerful*?  This is hilarious, Chaney.  Where do you
get the imagination to come up with these fantasies, anyway?  (You know,
you'd do better if you'd quit shooting yourself down so much...)

>Patrick Humphrey. The one man who has hunted me in the most relentless
>fashion, on USENET. The one man who, at one time during the summer,
>generated more Steve Chaney responses than, in all likelihood, anyone else
>combined. Not even Larry Margolis or Gordon Storga have matched the volume
>of stuff I have seen from you.

Not bad for someone who wasn't even here for two and a half weeks, either...
but hey, it's not my fault if you in your lunatic way decided I'd be an easy
target.

>Patrick Humphrey. The man who has a pattern of scanning my accounts to see
>if I'm there, or, possible, also what I'm up to. The man who was the first
>to alert all of talk.abortion that I, indeed, was no longer on ATHENA. The
>man who e-mailed me first, when I appeared on ATHENA again, to tell me that
>he also had another account. (Whoopee!)

Oh, *really*?  Let's see -- "finger" is all I need to see if you're around
at athena.  I guess you can't do that from your precious little NeXT Cube.
Indeed, finger was returning "???" for your account at athena -- which means
the user name isn't recognized by the specified hostname.  When you came
back to athena, YOU e-mailed ME with a bunch of your racist garbage.
(In other words, your first paragraph is about what I'd normally expect of 
you:  nothing even close to the truth.)

>Patrick Humphrey. The man who told us during the summer that I could not be
>found on NEXTNET, and who probably hence cannot understand why I have been
>posting from NEXTNET since the near end of Spring 1992.

Lies again, huh, Dennis?  I said I couldn't finger nextnet.csus.edu -- and I
can't from here.  That says something about you -- posting from a site you know I can't finger.  (One other loony-tune has reacted that way -- yer old pal
Wavy Davy Rasmussen, the CompSci major.) I never said you couldn't be found
there, but you already know that anyway -- but hey, why should you tell the
truth?

>The man who obviously pays more attention to me than to his own wife. I
>fear the implications of THAT. (More pit bulls in the front yard! Yeah,
>that'll do it...)

Yeah.  Right.  I guess that's why I've been living over at Hermann Hospital
the past seven days?  (Oh, well.  I know reality never *was* your specialty.)

>Patrick Humphrey. The man who took his cue from Scott Roby and created YET
>ANOTHER Steve Chaney alias. While Scott Roby was busy manufacturing more
>fake (and ultimately unprovable) evidence for his Dennis Hall prank,
>Patrick Humphrey was busy playing copy-cat, attempting to accuse me of
>posting as - you guessed it - Conrad Vincent.

Really?  That's kinda funny, since you *did* post something with a header
on it that was identical to one that Conrad would have had on his posts --
but you forgot about the "Sender:" line, which gave it away.  I guess your 
memory isn't reliable enough to go back that far, though.

>I defeated Patrick Humphrey squarely, causing him to back down, and then
>claim that he never accused me of that in the first place. Actually, Conrad
>Vincent and I, both hit him at once.

I must have been somewhere else, then -- I never saw any trace of two drooling
morons, and loathsome bigots to boot.  More of that overactive imagination,
perhaps?

>Patrick Humphrey. The big Texan who read my article claiming that
>pro-aborts, with fetal tissue transplants on the horizon, now REALLY DO
>NEED dead babies (even if fetuses aren't babies, anencephalic infants ARE),
>and then told me to march my ass down there and tell him, a diabetic, to
>his face, that pro-aborts need dead babies.

Yep -- and in your typical chickenshit fashion, you've run and hid, just like
I said you would.  (I really hope *your* pancreas goes out on you, and then
see how you like living with the reality of having to be dependent on a 
bottle of insulin for the rest of your life.  I've been doing that for 
longer than you've been alive, little boy.)

>PatricKKK Humphrey. The man who then turned around and denied the very
>articles he wrote, telling me that I had better come march my fat black
>ass, as he referred to me, down there, and say he was a liar, to his face.

Damn straight -- and like the cowardly little beat-off you are, you ran
away and whined.  That's just about what I'd expect from someone whose
emotional age seems to be fixed at about four years.

>In front of his witnesses. No one has ever referred to anyone on this
>newsgroup in that kind of manner, calling them "fat chinese ass" or "fat
>Iranian ass" or whatever - only Patrick Humphrey, from Klans country in
>Houston, Texas, could have missed the teaching in school that you NEVER
>refer to someone derogatorily by their race - you don't refer to them by
>"your fat black ass." You refer to them, at worst, as "your fat ass." Of
>course, Ku Klux Klan families never teach their kids that.

Keep it up, Steve.  You're going to wind up apologizing to a *lot* of people
in Kentucky...and Virginia...and Georgia...and Indiana...and Florida...and
Tennessee...and Oklahoma...and Minnesota...and the Dakotas.  (You might
just have to apologize to a few people at CSUS, too, once they get a copy
of your words of "wisdom" -- you never know who might get to see what you're
wasting the taxpayers' money on up there in Sacramento.)

>Then, he wanted me to come to Texas and get his apology. He could not
>apologize to me directly, like a man, and say he was sorry for making a
>racist remark. I give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he has
>changed his position on this, since then. Inevitably, I will either prove
>right or be told I am wrong, on this assumption.

Word up, asshole -- I *know* I made my mistake, and I apologized to everyone
else who might have been offended by it because they deserved that much.  
You deserved it more than anyone else -- but thanks to your subsequent actions,
such as being *so* offended by my phrase that you were BRAGGING about it
in t.a, I take back my offer.  You don't get anything from me.  EVER.
Go fuck yourself with a chainsaw and follow it with a Drano enema, Chaney --
because that'll do the human race more good than anything else you've done
in your misbegotten life.

(In other words, you had your chance -- and in typical Steve Chaney fashion,
you threw it away.)

>And he got slammed by his own people, about it.

You bleeding buffoon -- *that* was "slammed"?  Well, I guess in your
little world, that's what you'd call it.  Those of us in the real world
would look at it a different way.

>PatricKKK, I guarantee you, I won't be coming to Texas to see you and your
>witnesses, unless I am coming with mine. And seeing as that we may be
>walking into Klan territory, we will be loaded for bear. If I ever come to
>say something to your face, PatricKKK, best believe I'll be prepped to
>handle any violence on your part. In fact, I may be bringing a steam engine
>to wage war against what turns out to be a walnut and not a real man.

Go right ahead, putz.  You show up here, and I'll laugh in your face while
I call the RUPD.  They don't like troublemakers, especially if they're not
from Rice.  If by some chance you showed up at my residence, you'd be going
downtown to enjoy the hospitality of HPD -- and they're none too fond of 
out-of-towners, either.  A few months for you on the banks of Buffalo Bayou
would do the rest of us a lot of good, I agree.
(You're messing with a native of Bloody Harlan, Chaney.  I don't think you
have the foggiest idea of what you're getting yourself into with your fat
mouth running off like it is -- and I don't think you'd care much for it.
I know *I* wouldn't.)

>You called me an asshole and said that was the reason why you wouldn't
>apologize to me. Yet you are clearly the most obnoxious asshole that has
>attacked me yet, and it is HARD to out-asshole Susan Garvin in any bad
>category. BUT you did it, hands-down.

Well, I just don't know how I'll sleep tonight knowing that -- but I expect
I'll find a way to.  (My wife getting out of the hospital today or tomorrow
won't hurt my chances, for sure.)

>THEN you said that in a racially diverse place like Houston, there is no
>room for Klansmen and that everyone who knows you, knows you're not a
>Klansmen. Well, PatricKKK, as I said before, how do YOU think an African
>American in that racially diverse community, would react if you got mad and
>referred to them as "your fat black ass," huh? What kind of mentality does
>it take for someone to, while they're writing an article to talk.abortion,
>not be able to catch something so blatantly RACIST, before they post it?

Fuck you, Steve.  I guess you NEVER make mistakes?  I did, and I owned up to
it, and that was that -- except for this one jackass in Sacramento who was *so*
offended by it he was goddamn BRAGGING about it in this newsgroup!  Got any
more lies to slander me with, Dennis?

>Oh, and that bit about "I said March your fat black ass down here and say
>it to my face... but I didn't mean that as a racist phrase. Sorry" REALLY
>blew over, huh?

Yep, except for this professional agitator at CSUS who just couldn't handle
*not* being the center of attention...

>PatricKKK, how does it feel to realize that I have beaten you constantly,
>decisively, and embarrassingly, right and left, pillar to post, over and
>over again, and to add insult to injury, captured your embarrassed face on
>a pseudo-GIF, to boot?

How should I know?  You've done none of those things in the slightest -- all
you've done is libel me repeatedly, but that's about all you seem to know, so
I suppose that's normal for you.

>At least Mark Kaufman has the sense to run and hide when I come calling,
>but you? You rush like moths to the flame, to tackle me with some new b.s.

All I have to do is sit back and watch you destroy yourself with your own
bullshit -- and you're doing one bang-up job of it.  I notice that other
pro-lifers seem to be awfully anxious to get as far away from you as 
possible -- and I sure can't say I'd blame them for that...

>Remember that "I have DOCUMENTATION that you posted as Dennis Hall" ? That
>was the Mother of all Poker Games, Humphrey. You thought Roby was right and
>that now, I was scared stiff as a board, and that I would crack and cry
>out, "Okay, I was posting as Dennis Hall!" to avoid a further challenge
>that would bring out "documentation" against me. Well, the fact was, I knew
>what the facts were, unlike YOU, and I told you to show me that
>documentation. You folded. No, let's translate that into pro-choice
>propaganda - you told us that you... goofed... in using the word
>"documentation." Actually, it was a phone call, you said.

No one believes you, Steve.  But, if you want to keep pretending that it 
happened that way because you say it did, be my guest.  Just don't whine
too much when someone comes along and plants you in the street face-first,
eh?  You're asking for it -- so don't be surprised if someone obliges you.
(It obviously won't be me -- I have a few responsibilities, unlike bums
like you.)

>Yet another battle you lost against me, Humphrey.

Yet another instance where you thought you were fighting a battle -- but no one
else bothered to tell you there was nothing going on...

>Well, PatricKKK Humphrey, I have DOCUMENTATION saying that you have an IQ
>over 60, but can I prove that? Hardly. No hard evidence exists to prove
>such a claim about you. Okay, okay, the documentation was a phone call. I
>goofed in calling it 'documentation.'
>But I DO have SOLID documentation of your racist remarks, Humphrey.

No -- you have solid documentation of a remark I admit I made.  YOU say it's
racist.  *I* say it's in extremely bad taste, and I've had more people agree
with me than with your vituperative ravings -- now, why could that be, I 
wonder?

>Quite obviously, PatricKKK, I am seriously superior to you, and am way
>above your league. It is better for you and your pro-abort contingent that
>you just leave me the hell alone, and just stick to the facts as well as
>your feeble mind can comprehend them, because your lies sure as hell are
>not blowing over. When you try to tackle me, you're pissing into the wind,
>or so your loss-filled track record clearly shows. In my case, it's not a
>wind, but a tornado: you'll not only get it back in your face, but you'll
>get swept into the sky and dumped unceremoniously on your ass, on the cold,
>hard Texas USENET.concrete.

Nice fantasy you have there, Steve.  I hope you get to go through what my
wife has gone through the past week at Hermann Hospital, because even such a
piece of human refuse as yourself *might* learn something from the experience.
Right now, I'm worried about her -- and I know I'd feel a LOT better if
you were in her place and she was well again.  You're useless to just about
everyone.  At least my wife has something besides hatred, bigotry, racism,
greed, arrogance -- all those qualities you seem to eager to bash the rest of
us with -- to offer our neighbors.

(Of course, brain surgery *would* be a waste of time, in your case...:-)

>Someone can bash my ego in this post, because it does look quite inflated
>compared to your null self-esteem after reading this. But no one can
>challenge the facts: I've beaten you in each and every single battle that
>we have had. I have embarrassed you worse than I have embarrassed anyone
>else; and I have caught you more blatantly than I caught Mark Kaufman, and
>that's HARD to do, because his fuck-ups are pretty wide-open.

Of course, it's interesting that no one else seems to pay much mind to your
"facts", mainly because they're your opinions.  I guess they don't teach 
you that in the Land of the Fruit and the Nut, though...

>Never forget, Humphrey, that I do prefer peace. But when the flamewar is
>going, I pack THE most power and punch, and you have learned up-front just
>how fierce and relentless I am. Say what you will about my flames; I am
>accurate, and I get the job done.

This is the funniest thing I've seen you post in a long time -- and it's
up to your rigorous standards for accuracy -- 0%.

>And don't bother me with your complaints about me kicking a little
>dirt into your face, Humphrey. 

Are you kidding?  Only you would try to kick dirt in my face and not notice
you're standing on Astroturf...

>I find it more fun getting onto talk.abortion so I can kick your FACE 
>into the DIRT.  

No kidding?  When do you think you'll ever get up the miniscule amount of
courage needed to start?  I want to see that if it ever happens...

-- 
Patrick L. Humphrey  (patrick@is.rice.edu)  Rice Networking & Computing Systems
     +1 713 528-3626 at Rice. 776-1541 at home. 667-6554 at Palace Lanes. 

                        The SubGenius MUST have Slack!
Newsgroups: talk.abortion