HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lorenzo@rintintin.Colorado.EDU (Eric Lorenzo)
Subject: Re: Golden Globe Winners
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 23:35:45 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.095302.13406@waikato.ac.nz> hist1261@waikato.ac.nz writes:
>Could some one please post the results of the Golden Globe Awards.  I 
>asked for the nominations a few days back and there was no response, so
>presumably everyone is really busy.  Just the main (movie) winners would
>do...please...

	Could someone explain what the Golden Globe Awards are?  It seems
everyone is claimning to have won one in their movie commercials.  Are they
considered prestigious (not as much as Oscar of course)?

Thanks for the time,
Eric
-- 
       --    O          The thrill is                   Eric J. Lorenzo
     ---   </\_      not just in winning,       lorenzo@Rintintin.Colorado.EDU
   ----  -\/\         but in the courage                  also @UCSU
      ---   /_         to join the race    -?               & @Spot
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: zaphod@madnix.uucp (Ron Bean)
Subject: Re: Well known actors as punks
Organization: ARP Software
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 01:12:47 GMT

bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole) writes:
 
>Wow!  I think you have something going here Kurt, I can add four more:
>
>3.      Willem Defoe as a punk in _The Hunger_ harassing Susan Sarandon.
>
>4.      Matt Frewer (Max Headroom) as a punk that tries to bother _Supergirl_.
>
>5.      Bill Paxton (Aliens) lends some clothes to Arnie in _The Terminator_.
>
>6.      Daniel Day Lewis as a gay street punk in _My Beautiful Laundrette_.
 
7. Henry Winkler as a punk in "The Lords of Flatbush".
 
==================
zaphod@madnix.UUCP (Ron Bean)
uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!madnix!zaphod
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: mig@csulb.edu (Mig Gomez)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:10:03 GMT
Organization: Cal State Long Beach

In article <1993Jan22.162723.29846@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov> leem@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov (Lee Mellinger) writes:
>In article <00966F32.9EC42120@vms.csd.mu.edu> 9072falkk@vms.csd.mu.edu writes:
>:I swore I saw a trailer for this film with Sean Connery playing the role
>:of Conner.  Any news on a release date for this one?  Any word on other 
>:members of the cast?
>:
>:
>
>Trailer I saw last week said the release will be in june of 93.
>

   Hmmm... Looks like a Michael Crichton summer. Jurassic Park
   opens in June also. I can't wait.

   Who's directing "Rising Sun"?


mig



>
>Lee
>
>"Mit Pulver und Blei, die Gedanken sind frei."
>
>|Lee F. Mellinger                 Caltech/Jet Propulsion Laboratory - NASA
>|4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109 818/354-1163  FTS 792-1163     
>|leem@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV


-- 
=======================================================================
Mig Gomez                                          mig@beach.csulb.edu
Instructional Computing Consultant                 CSULB Library LL22
CSULB                                              1250 Bellflower Blvd.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: ckt4x@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (The Mantle Clinic)
Subject: Re: The Vanishing (U.S. Make I guess( )
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:50:54 GMT

arnold@pyramid.unr.edu  writes:
> 
> Well, I was watching HBH here, and they had a trailer for _THE_VANISHING_
> which I do remember seeing as a Dutch film (I think) and it was superb. 
> The U.S. verson stars Keefer Sutherland... wonder if it will be as good as
> the original?

I doubt it will be even nearly as good.  The trailer I saw
seemed to show that Sluizer is going to be making this version
extremely flashy and have a lot of scenes in dark basements a
la Silence of the Lambs.  This is a wrong move, IMHO, as one of
the truly interesting factors of the Dutch original (and there
were many) was that the movie was very subtle but remained
suspenseful.  If Sluizer decides flash=suspense in the remake,
I think he'll fail.

Plus, Keifer and Jeff Bridges don't seem nearly as convincing
or appropriate in their respective roles when compared to the
original performances in the Dutch (ie, real and only) version.
--
                     A helpless victim of society...
                                Curt Tsui
                            curt@Virginia.EDU            
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: styrins@ucunix.san.uc.edu (Stephen Styring)
Subject: Re: Brian L. Johnson, critic
Organization: University of Cincinnati
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 03:05:48 GMT

In article <C1KyIn.5GA@rice.edu> rburlin@owlnet.rice.edu (Rusty Burlingame) writes:
>Well, it's time to pull out the old author-kill file.  Here are
>quotes from the indescriminating critic himself:
>
>>On a scale of zero to five, I give THE MUPPET CHRISTMAS CAROL a five.
>>On a scale of zero to five, I give KNIGHT MOVES a five.
>>On a scale of zero to five, I give THE DISTINGUISHED GENTLEMAN a five.
>>On a scale of zero to five, I give BODY OF EVIDENCE a five.
>>On a scale of zero to five, I give CHAPLIN a five.
>>I give SUDDENLY LAST SUMMER a five on a scale of zero to five.
>
>>I give BOB ROBERTS a two on a scale of zero to five.
>
>
>I had thought he'd review weird horror films and the like, which was
>the way he started out.  Now, however, he's reviewing mainstream movies.
>And he's doing a really poor job of it.  I thought that the review
>newsgroup was moderated for just this reason.  Oh, well.
>
>Rusty
>rburlin@owlnet.rice.edu


Rusty, I couldn't agree with you more.  These reviews are not helpful. 
In fact, they are frequently one big spoiler -- the entire plot in
three paragraphs.  I avoid these reviews at all costs, especially
if I have a remote interest in seeing the film.
    
The Phantom, however, is a real fav of mine.  The writing is skilled
and the analysis, insightful.  These reviews are really worth
the energy the author puts into them.  (Thanks, Phantom)

Kelley
From: cb366@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark B. Bendiksen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Lorenzo Released?
Date: 25 Jan 1993 16:48:43 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Did _Lorenzo's Oil_ get national release last Friday (1/22)?

I'm asking because I live in a small city with only twelve
screens. Usually when a movie of that caliber gets released
I have to wait several weeks until other "quality" movies
get booted out of our town. Currently taking up space on our
city's silver screen's are definitive duds (i.e. _Hexed_, 
_Aspen Extreme_) and older films (i.e. _The Bodyguard_).

Oh well....


Mark B. Bendiksen
cb366@freenet.cwru.edu
-- 
"If we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto,
 We'll just be bogus, too."-- Dr. Jeff Spicolli
From: jreece@sousa.intel.com (John Reece)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Name of hotel in The Shining?
Date: 25 Jan 93 23:28:38 GMT
Reply-To: jreece@sousa.intel.com
Organization: Intel - Information Technologies

In article <1k1lj9INNd54@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, rcosby@bcm.tmc.edu (Randy C. Cosby) writes:

> Tried to email...bounced or something... anyway, the interiors
> were filmed in Estes Park, Colorado, at the Stanley Hotel... Mr. Stanley
> invented the Stanley Steamer.. automobile.... I dunno about the
> exterior... it was called the Overlook in the book I think....

The exteriors were done at the Timberline Lodge on Mt. Hood, about
an hour's drive east of Portland, Oregon.  It was 
built by CCC and WPA artists during the 1930's.  The actual timber-framed
interior is quite cozy.  There is no hedge-maze.  That was 
erected in part to hide a modern day lodge for the adjoining
ski area.

-- 
John Reece			"This lifeboat is full"	
Not an Intel spokesman 			 
From: danielw@hpopd.pwd.hp.com (Daniel Wink)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 13:24:44 GMT
Subject: Re: Raising Cain (spoiler?)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, CCSY Messaging Centre, UK.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies


>In any case, weren't there DAYS between him kidnapping Karen and when he
>tried to kill his wife?  I mean, his wife had time to have an affair with
>her old lover! I don't believe that Karen was in the trunk all that time,
>and only woke up when he tried to drown his wife.  Wouldn't Karen have been
>awake, in the trunk, pounding on the lid for at least a day before the car
>got dumped?

I think Cain disposed of Karen shortly after he chloroformed
her in the same way as he tryed to kill his wife; by running
KAREN's car into the swamp. The car they found wasn't the one
his wife escaped from (I think).

Dan.
From: 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Review:  ALIVE
Date: 21 Jan 1993 15:27:15 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

>>>ALIVE
>>>
>>
>>Now, a question for those who have seen it, involving spoilers:

>>How many miles and for how many days did the two guys walk in
>>the end?  Those mountains seemed endless but it could not have
>>been for all that long.  The movie didn't say.
>>
>>Rae
>
>I think the two guys walked for two days.  I think I remember hearing them say
>they had been there 70 days before the two left, and then I heard or read that
>the total time was 72 days.
>
>Mr. Kelly Dougan
>

I checked the book last night and it took them 10 days to walk out.  I 
don't know how many miles.  The third guy turned back on day 4.
They must have left camp on day 61.  They were spotted on the tenth day
by a peasant but he thought they were tourists and left.  He came back
the next day and they were able to talk to him. (They were across a river
or something and couldn't cross without help).

Mary H.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: guy@harlqn.co.uk (Guy Snape)
Subject: Bill&Ted's BJ question
Organization: Harlequin Limited, Cambridge, England
Distribution: rec
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 10:56:58 GMT

Hi.

Saw Bill & Ted's bogus journey the other night & laughed muchly.  Can
anyone inform me of the significance of  the word "STATION" though?

Please mail me.

TIA

Guy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mcbride@owlnet.rice.edu (Douglas Foster McBride)
Subject: Re: Peter's Friends stereotyping
Organization: Rice University
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 09:09:47 GMT

In article <1js2djINNp9e@umbc4.umbc.edu> maher@umbc.edu (Dr. Michael Maher) writes:
>Afraid I found the film rather tiresome...
>
>In "Friends", there is a meaner touch
>in the character of the American tv star, who is bollemic(sp), a diet 
>and exercise fadist, obsessed with appearance, and possibly Jewish.
>The black woman is a strumpet, and her working class companion a 
>boorish simpleton.  This leaves only the upper class and yuppie
>characters, both male, as sane sympathetic characters.

I found the songwriting couple to be complex and believable.  Rudner's
character does have problems (as do Peter and the alcoholic other
sympathetic character), but some scenes (including her final scene) do
add enough character depth to save her from being dismissed as a
stereotype.  

-- 
 Doug McBride                (mcbride@rice.edu)               (713) 630-8796
 "Is this Horrible?  Is this Horrible?  It's the ugliness men, Mr. Horrible
  We're just trying to bug you, we though our dreadfulness might be a thing
		to annoy you with."  -- They Might Be Giants
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: egnilges@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Edward G. Nilges)
Subject: Re: Coppola's DRACULA
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:10:55 GMT

In article <SYNTH.93Jan19230652@deepthought.unm.edu> synth@deepthought.unm.edu (Synth F. Oberheim) writes:
>
>egnilges@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Edward G. Nilges) writes:
>
>Ed> Rod Serling, the very Twilight Zone man, predicted in the Fifties that
>Ed> television would produce "a new citizenry, able to be very selective
>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Ed> about cereals and automobiles but unable to think."
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Well, this time you didn't read in imaginary interpretations -- you simply
>missed the point.  The fact I jab at "<x>'s customer base" is just that:
>attacking the *people* in question.  The product itself, or any opinion I
>may have about it, is not a factor.  Your claim (1) and (2) miss the
>target completely.  Rather I am questioning the faculties of the masses
>that would need such a warning.  Not surprising, then, that Serling and
>I see eye-to-eye on this.

No, Serling was prophesying YOU, my friend.  You see, years ago, people
did not engage TO THE EXTENT THEY DO NOW in the habit of measuring each
other by the make of car they drove, and Yuppies who pride themselves on
driving Japanese-made rice rockets, far from being superior to the great
mass of consumers, buy-into this syndrome at an extreme degree.  In
1960, the person who purchased a foreign car did so precisely because he
or she did not measure him/herself by the luxury of the car he or she
drove; for the first imports were strippos made for the
still-impoverished masses of postwar Germany, Japan and Britain.
Nowadays, imports have replaced Cadillacs as marks of status and it is
precisely the buyers of imports who look down upon the "masses" (note
that you use the term with contempt) and who expend, in my opinion, far
too much energy and treasure on useless options, which have migrated
from 1960s Cadillacs to 1990s Infinitis.

And your inability to think, at least with any compassion or good sense,
is shown by your continuing inability to perceive that some situations,
including setting oneself afire, warrant stating the obvious.  If S is
the (very small) cost of stating the obvious and F is the (very large)
cost of setting oneself  afire, S/F is a small ratio.




From: jaym@hplsla.hp.com (Jay Miazga)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 17:47:57 GMT
Subject: Re: The Abyss .. again
Organization: HP Lake Stevens, WA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So while the "liquid air" does not exist, it is possible and even somewhat
plausible.  Certainly no harder to accept than a tendril of water 8-).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


I just received the Winter'93 copy of 'The Bent', the Tau Beta Pi
(Engineering honor society) magazine.
In it is an article by Dr. Thomas H. Shaffer III.  The article
is titled 'Breathing Liquid'.  In it he discussed the development
of oxygenated liquids as a treatment for respiratory problems in
both prematurely born infants and adults with respiratory problems
due to trauma, aspiration or other afflictions.

I don't want to type the whole thing in, but basically mechanical
respirators tend to damage lung tissure, and using oxygenated liquids
could be used to introduce oxygen at lower pressures because of 
lower surface tensions.  An on-demand ventilation system was developed
that circulated the liquid through the lungs and removed carbon-dioxide.
He mentioned that " This particular device was cited explicitly in the 
novelization of THE ABYSS and formed the conceptual basis for the deep-
diving device depicted in the movie."

In the author's bio, it notes that Dr. Shaffer and a colleague conducted
the first human test of liquid breathing on May 10, 1989.

In the text of the article, Dr. Shaffer says: 

    Repeated trials by different investigators confirmed that, when 
    mechanical ventilation is performed properly, oxygenation and 
    ventilation can be effectively maintained in the liquid-filled
    lung for extended periods up to 30 hours (personal experience).
    There is no known physiological limitation to this form of
    ventilation. 

So they guy's DONE IT.  Blew MY mind.


jaym
From: hamster@xymox.apana.org.au (Anthony Horan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Christopher Lambert in FORTRESS
Distribution: world
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 1.16f (10.17.92) by Mike Schwartz & Michael B. Smith
Date: 22 Jan 93 14:28:20 AEDT
Organization: Disorganized...

In article <11776@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au (Murray Chapman) writes:

> Christopher Lambert's new movie, FORTRESS, is about to be released in Australia.
> It is one of the first major-budget films to be made at the Warner Brothers'
> Studio on the Gold Coast.

Which is something they're desperately trying to play down...

> PLOT: Lambert plays a man in the future imprisoned by the MEN-TEL corporation
> for having more than his allocated one child.  He must escape, and rescue his
> wife, who is also a prisoner.

... and the prisoners are kept inside the bounds of the prison by devices
implanted inside them called "intestinators". If they move outside the
yellow line, pain. If they move outside the red line, their stomach
explodes. This is a thinly disguised steal from the Rutger Hauer
made-for-cable film "Deadlock" (or "Wedlock" if you're in Australia...).
Just one of many "original" plot points in this devastatingly original
film...

> The film looks pretty good, better than I expected.  It has a definite ALIEN^3
> look/feel to it, but perhaps not quite as grubby.  Also has shades of Total
> Recall.  Limited shots of SFX look quite good, but weren't a feature of the
> preview.

The trailer is the best thing about this film. The matte work is quite
good, but the script is a dog, the sets look like rejects from "Blake's 7",
the acting is across-the-board awful, the direction is sluggish, the
editing amateurish, the philosophy and "moral" are vomit-inducing, and the
characters are all stereotypes (you know - the standard big-as-a-truck mean
sonofabitch bikie-type nasty prisoner, the brainy prisoner, the nervous
prisoner - who at least bites the big one early - and the totally cliched
and gratuitous colourful Latin American prisoner.)

To top things off, when I saw this film, the ending was missing. The excuse
was that the print got damaged (!), but my guess is some hasty
re-structuring of the credits. The distributors seemed VERY worried about
people finding out that it was shot at - horror, shock - MOVIE WORLD, but
it looks like they're too late.

By the way, for "Until The End Of The World" Wim Wenders shot most of the
Australian interiors at the Movie World studios, and nobody complained
about that... :-)

> Probably worth checking out!

Don't say I didn't warn you...


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Anthony Horan, Melbourne Australia  -  hamster@xymox.apana.org.au
    "The Looks Or The Lifestyle? I'll take the lifestyle. And the looks."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: twong@civil.ubc.ca (Thomas Wong)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: What's a AA rating?
Date: 21 Jan 1993 23:23:47 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Civil Engineering, U.B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: sam.civil.ubc.ca


Simple question. What is a rating of AA for movies?
ie. what does AA stand for?
Thanx.

Thomas.
From: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: top grossing movies
Date: 21 Jan 93 23:31:45 EST
Reply-To: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

   Here are the estimated top ticket sales Friday through Monday,
according to Exhibitor Relations Co. Inc., with distributor, weekend
gross, number of theater locations, average per location, total gross
and number of weeks in release.
   Figures are based on actual receipts and projections where actual
figures were not available. One location can include several screens in
multiplex theaters; studios generally do not disclose the true number of
screens.

   1. "Aladdin," Disney, $10.9 million, 2,331 locations, $4,685 per location,
$139.1 million, 10 weeks.
   2. "A Few Good Men," Columbia, $8.7 million, 2,146 locations, $4,068 per
location, $101.6 million, six weeks.
   3. "Alive," Disney, $8.6 million, 1,132 locations, $7,619 per location,
$8.6 million, one week.
   4. "Nowhere to Run," Columbia, $8.2 million, 1,745 locations, $4,701 per
location, $8.2 million, one week.
   5. "Body of Evidence," MGM, $7.4 million, 2,050 locations, $3,593 per
location, $7.4 million, one week.
   6. "Scent of a Woman," Universal, $6.4 million, 1,212 locations, $5,240 per
location, $16.8 million, four weeks.
   7. "The Bodyguard," Warner Bros., $4.8 million, 1,705 locations, $2,839 per
location, $102.2 million, eight weeks.
   8. "Forever Young," Warner Bros., $4.3 million, 1,625 locations, $2,643 per
location, $45.4 million, five weeks.
   9. "Home Alone 2: Lost in New York," 20th Century Fox, $4.2 million, 1,775
locations, $2,351 per location, $156.8 million, nine weeks.
   10. "Chaplin," TriStar, $2.1 million, 1,080 locations, $1,916 per location,
$6.7 million, four weeks.
   11. "The Crying Game," Miramax, $1.8 million, 171 locations, $10,589 per
location, $8.6 million, eight weeks.
   12. "Hoffa," 20th Century Fox, $1.6 million, 947 locations, $1,717 per
location, $22 million, four weeks.
   13. "Leprechaun," Trimark, $1.3 million, 588 locations, $2,281 per
location, $4.6 million, two weeks.
   14. "Leap of Faith," Paramount, $1.2 million, 810 locations, $1,526 per
location, $21 million, five weeks.
   15. "The Distinguished Gentleman," Disney, $1 million, 841 locations,
$1,204 per location, $43.1 million, seven weeks.
   16. "A River Runs Through It," Columbia, $937,076, 623 locations,
$1,504 per location, $37.5 million, 15 weeks.
   17. "Malcolm X," Warner Bros., $816,617, 880 locations, $928 per location,
$47.1 million, nine weeks.
   18. "Lorenzo's Oil," Universal, $752,137, 102 locations, $7,374 per
location, $1 million, three weeks.
   19. "The Muppet Christmas Carol," Disney, $672,508, 757 locations,
$888 per location, $26.5 million, six weeks.
   20. "Under Siege," Warner Bros., $666,371, 665 locations, $1,002 per
location, $81.7 million, 15 weeks.
---
  SLMR 2.1a  Kiss that frog!
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rurfin@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Rural Finance Group)
Subject: Re: Where have all the old movie palaces gone
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 20:50:38 GMT


Forgive me if someone has already posted about this, but The Ohio Theater
in Columbus, Ohio still shows movies *from the golden age of Hollywood* during
the summer months.  They open with someone playing the fabulous Morton (sp?) 
organ.  And they always show one silent film with organ accompaniment each
summer.

Lori K.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jmemon@shearson.com (Janine Memon)
Subject: Re: SF NOVELS THAT WOULD
Organization: Lehman Brothers, NY
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:24:11 GMT

In article <1993Jan12.210334.13622@Virginia.EDU> cew2w@Virginia.EDU ("Chris Wrike") writes:
>victor.volkman@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us  writes:
>> -> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies,rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
>> -> From: jlpicard@austin.ibm.com (Craig Becker)
>> -> Subject: Re: SF Novels that would make Great Films
>> -> Message-ID: <C0EHDF.1Awn@austin.ibm.com>
>> -> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 21:36:51 GMT
>> 
>> -> I dunno...my money's on Stanley Kubrick, who's supposedly at work
>> -> right now on an SF movie.
>> 
>> I hope its "2060"!!!!
>>             
>> ----
>> +------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
>> | HAL 9000 BBS +1 313 663 4173 or 663 3959 | Four 14.4k v.32bis dial-ins |
>> | Public Access QWK-to-Usenet gateway      | With PCBoard 14.5aM & uuPCB |
>> +------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
>
>	I don't.  "2001" was great, although the book was
>better, but "2010" was only OK, and both Kubrick and Clarke
>have both admitted that the second film was the lesser of the
>two.  I did not like the book "2061".  I find it hard to
>believe that a spacecraft could land on Hayley's comet.  There
>were a few good action scenes in the book, but all in all I
>hope that Kubrick picks a new topic for his next movie.  Based
>on the BO returns of "2010", I believe he will.

As far as I know, Kubrick didn't direct "2010", he only directed "2001". Look at the difference between
the 2 movies. They are vastly different.

					Janine
--
Janine N. Memon				| All views expressed here are my own  
Lehman Bros, Inc.			| and should not be confused with those 
Amex Tower, World Financial Center	| of my employer.
New York, N.Y.				| email address jmemon@shearson.com