HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gritzner@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Thomas F. Gritzner)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: alt.inappropriate.followup
Keywords: crash-tim is lame lame lame ... what a shame ...
Date: 26 Aug 92 10:32:08 GMT
Followup-To: alt.lame,alt.shameful.confessions
Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
Originator: gritzner@sunbroy28.informatik.tu-muenchen.de


In article <1992Aug25.134838.20939@canon.co.uk>, Crash-Tim writes:
> bla bla bla! Gubznf, jub ner lbh nqqerffvat urer?  AB-BAR-SHPXVAT-PNERF.

Yawn. These poster children may take away the fun of staying at Flametown...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE GATEWAY[tm] TO FUCK-OFF

Game State

For: Crash-Tim, Loser and Net.Idiot of the Year

Inane Flame Types Equipment:

#1: NO-ONE-FUCKING-CARES. Foe is said to be all alone, viz. without any
audience. This is used to make foe insecure in doing replies, although friend
likes to get answers to his thrash.

#2: PRIMITIVE TALK. Foe is set under obligatory drivel; words containing ``fuck''
are appropriate. This is used to convince foe that friend has a great vocabulary;
mostly, it fails since it shows the brainlessness of friend. Beware of doing that
sort of flames, even if you like to get fast attention to your postjunk.

#3: NO NOT ME. Foe has switched to third-person speech of friend. This is the
right occasion to deny concernedness and responsibility of friend. Brainless
but sometimes working.

Intelligent Flame Types Equipment:

NONE, since player hasn't got enough ability. Intelligence low has to be stated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Facing this, so, may I ask you if you are a misled artificial intelligence
program? Another example for malfunctioning ai software?

Then, would you be so kind to kill your own parent process... since you are
only a child within a network of malfunctioning paradigmatic ai programs? Yes?
No? No?! What a pity!

You're so *cute* grabbing to the last word of our thread without any new ideas
inside your flames. Tsk tsk tsk!

Get a life, newbie, but do not bore/bother us!

Sinistrely
--
		Thomas F. Gritzner
From: gdg019@cck.coventry.ac.uk (Ridley McIntyre)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: ALIEN question
Date: 26 Aug 92 14:05:05 GMT
Organization: Ironpig Arcadia, Coventry, UK

In article <5814@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner) writes:
>From article <f6an3_@lynx.unm.edu>, by lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble):
>> If the names of the *ships* made the _Nostromo_ and the _Sulaco_
>> implausible to you
>
>Not the Nostromo, merely the Sulaco.
>
>> In fact, I'd go so far as to say you're likely to be the *only person on
>> the planet* who's an anal enough fanboy to even see this as a *problem*. 
>
>Go home and play, and come back to this newsgroup when you have to say
>something about movies.

Oh, F - off and die, Markus. I've sat here reading your rantings about the
same film for long enough and I think we all get the message. So you think
Aliens was full of plot holes. So what? It never spoiled my enjoyment of
the movie when I came to the same conclusion that the entire film is based
on pointless circumstance, but so is the first movie. And then I started 
looking at other films and nearly all movies are based on pointless 
circumstance. That's what movies are all about. Now I don't even think that
Jim Cameron would disagree that Aliens was made for its entertainment and
financial value. It was a film where the tension and action were more important
than the plot, and it's done in such a way that you weren't left thinking
about the plot holes after the first time you see it (not like T2 where I
came out of the cinema feeling overawed by the special effects but wondering
about how they dare change the future, when the first one proved that you
can't) and that's the important thing about it. It was great cinema, and I
think that most of the people on this newsgroup agree with me. Hell, it
wasn't art, it didn't make me think about the meaning of life, but it kept
me holding on the arms of the seat for nearly two hours. What did it do for
you?


-- 
		 **Ridley McIntyre - Ronin Ironpig**
		     gdg019@cck.coventry.ac.uk
		 -----------------------------------
		  "Like your new haircut." - Bishop
From: kebbin@rotag.crud.mn.org (Kebbin Doohickey)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why, look what showed up in my mailbox!
Date: 4 Sep 92 00:46:00 GMT
Followup-To: misc.test
Organization: Corrupt Megabucks Corporation, Data Operations Division

In article <la4e7vINNhds@news.bbn.com>
        levin@bbn.com (Joel B Levin) writes:

]rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) sends along:
]
]|From franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca Sun Aug 30 11:03:13 1992
]
]
]||	      Not only are you just joining the bandwagon that has been
]||formed against Kevin, 
]
]	BWAHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAH!
]
]There's a.f's latest posterboy, always good for a laugh.


As legal representative of the Kebbin Klub, I am informing you that
the Kebbin Klub has exclusive rights to the term "posterboy", on
account of our having locked it up so securely, and that you shall
either cease and desist from using the term to describe individuals
who are not members of the Kebbin Klub, or we shall seek damages in an
unspecified amount at an unspecified time.


-- 
Kebbin Doohickey                kebbin@rotag.crud.mn.org
Corrupt Megabucks Corporation   221 State Highway, Suite 0, Midwest, USA
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne)
Subject: Re: Feminism & Women's Studies
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 00:12:33 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <1992Aug31.203753.29461@news.columbia.edu> dan@cubmol.bio.columbia.edu (Daniel Zabetakis) writes:
>In article <lyhnhd=.payner@netcom.com> payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug31.142504.13145@panix.com> smeyer@panix.com (Seth Meyer) writes:
>>>I tried taking a women's studies class in college.  I thought it would
>>>be interesting to see what I could do to help reduce sexism in our
>>>society.
>>
>>To play devils advocate here, is not the very subject of "women's studies"
>>sexist given that there are no 'men's studies". I rather suspect that
>>anyone proposing tha latter subject would be laughed out of the room.
>> 
>   Sure there are men's studies courses. We just usually call them 'chemistry'
>'physics', 'math', 'economics', and 'art'.
 
An interesting answer, but we seem to be talking about different things. 
 
>    I overheard this in a debate between two philosophy majors when I was a
>U-grad.  You can either say that line with heavy sarcasm, or breathless
>innocence, depending on the effect you want to generate.
>
>  Followups to alt.flame.
>
>DanZ

Rich

payner@netcom.com


Xref: sparky alt.flame:12455 talk.politics.misc:42985
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Mr. Robinson's Neighborhood
Date: 31 Aug 92 15:19:57 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton


	He's back . . . GREEN, rested, and ready- TROLL!!!
So, let the attack begin . . . 

	Well, I see Bur has slithered back under his rock so I'll just have to
be content with scorching that insufferable pusshead Mr. Robinson.  Just a
quick insight and psychological profile into Rob's life . . .  Every night
after Rob's mom slides his dinner under the door, he frantically writes his
rough drafts for alt.flame using his 8-color pack of little scribbler crayons.
Since he always writes on the wall, this pisses Mrs. R off.   Now, there's hope
for you Rob.  The new Crayola markers wash off with water.  Now after you 
post your drivel you can wash down the walls with your own drool- how fitting.
Now if you could only get those sticky cum stains off of your keyboard . . . .

						Troll
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12254 alt.fan.kevin-darcy:353
From: trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
Subject: Re: The Man With No Brain (Was: The world...)
Date: 18 Aug 92 17:26:00 GMT
Organization: TSAKC-TC

In article <1992Aug12.015507.4422@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
        kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran) writes:

] B(0-4) c- d- e++ f- g++ k(+) m r(-) s++(+) t
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       Kebbin thinks this is an obfuscated C program.


Xref: sparky alt.flame:12427 alt.fan.kevin-darcy:359
From: rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
Subject: Re: "responsible for the holocaust"
Date: 30 Aug 92 04:48:12 GMT
Followup-To: news.net-cops.kevin-darcy
Distribution: na
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die

In article <1992Aug24.160746.1767@Princeton.EDU> greg@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Gregory Nowak) writes:
>I used to think you were a pathetic mentally ill person deserving of
>pity. Now it's clear that you're a pathetic mentally ill person with
>a shallow, unreasoned moral philosophy as vicious and
>self-justificatory as the first philosophical musings of adolescent
>males. 

Hey, Kevin Darcy owns the "shallow, unreasoned moral philosophy 
as vicious and self-justificatory as the first philosophical mus-
ings of adolescent males" concession in this newsgroup.  Better 
pay up or Kevie will sue you.



---------------
for those of you who may not be aware of this, kebbin is an expert
on arguing an issue from both sides, having reversed himself on just
about every net issue he's taken a position on. this reversal often
happens in a matter of hours and, in some cases, it happens within the
same post. 
					-- Jim Keegan
					<3kkqc!d@rpi.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K. Cochran & homophobia
Date: 27 Aug 92 01:27:00 GMT
Organization: TSAKC-TC


In article <Aug.24.17.39.24.1992.26879@romulus.rutgers.edu>
        kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu (Theodore A. Kaldis) writes:

]if only homosexuals
]did not have this most bothersome habit of thrusting themselves upon
]us.

Well, dammit, T*d, quit opening up.


--
Barry Schwartz        trashman@crud.mn.org
From: trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Date: 18 Aug 92 17:26:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: TSAKC-TC

In article <92225.095931ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
        Linda Birmingham <ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> writes:

]In his never ending attempt to backpedal, Darcy writes
]In article <1992Aug12.020846.7594@cfctech.cfc.com>:

]>In article <1992Aug10.031935.11328@watson.ibm.com> Larry Margolis writes:

]>Larry, there's a big difference between discussing such matters in detached,
]>abstract generalities, on the one hand (as Suzanne was doing),
]
]Suzanne's post was detached?

>From reality, Linda, from reality.  That's got to be what he means.
(I haven't seen the article, but we _are_ talking about the Ms. Math
Major.)

]>I've apologized. Why does this flamewar need to rage
]>on and on?
]
]Well Darcy, do you think its possible this continues to
]rage because you persist in trying to blame the victim
]and paint yourself as the moral watchdog of alt.flame?

To put it another way, the flamewar rages because nobody has (or
will) apologize to Kebbie, and that bugs him.  Now, if someone _did_
apologize to Kebbie, then the flamewar would rage because Kebbin
would gloat.


--
Barry Schwartz        trashman@crud.mn.org
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12329 talk.abortion:33423
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: DAC: "I smoked, and maybe I _did_ inhale..." (was Re: F Chaney
Date: 25 Aug 92 19:46:01 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <1992Aug25.002409.12014@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu
(Stephen A Chaney) advises DAC:
> 
> People don't suddenly start showing up on talk.abortion to fight a flame
> war against one person in particular, unless that one person is a
> flamelord who is blasting pro-aborts senseless, and the situation clearly
> calls for extra help.

Hey, fuckwit!  Yeah, Chaney, I mean you!

Your original message was _cross-posted_ to _alt.flame_.  That's without
doubt where DAC read it.  I'm sure I can say, with complete confidence,
that he has a less-than-minimal interest in your fantasies of what might be
happening in talk.abortion.

Now, as far as your being a "flamelord" is concerned, all I can tell you is
that you'd better get the infirmary to cut back the dosage on your
medication a tad.  You seem to be hallucinating.  Claiming to be "blasting
pro-aborts senseless" is not the same thing as doing it.  All I've seen you
doing so far is making yourself look silly.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
From: levin@bbn.com (Joel B Levin)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K. Cochran is still a homophobe
Date: 25 Aug 1992 21:19:36 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com
Keywords: K. Cochran, homophobe, homophobia

stu5s14@bcrka287.bnr.ca (James Cherry) writes:
|In article <l9a45vINNdig@news.bbn.com>, levin@bbn.com (Joel B Levin) posts:
|>Here's an additional clue: the references to anal sex are intended for
|>homophobes like kevin whose sphincters tighten in terror at the
|>thought of anything remotely like a penis being inserted into their
|>own anal passages, or who fear even the remotest possibility that they
|>might want such a thing.
|>
|>Keith as a self-hating homosexual, indeed.  HAH!

|I'm glad you're so up on Mr. Cochran's intentions.  

I see you still haven't asked Mr. Cochran what he intended.  Care to
bet whether your interpretation is closer than mine?

|You also seem to confuse "homophobic" with "homosexual".  I don't recall
|anyone accusing Mr. Cochran of being homosexual, and even if they did, I'm
|not accusing him of this.

Uh huh. [Stop laughing, Keith.]

|Then, in article <94422@bu.edu>, kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star)
|says:

|>Perhaps, Mr Cherry, if you would ask Mr Cochran of his sexual orientation,
|>you would be better apprised of the nature of his postings.

|What has Mr. Cochran's sexual orientation to do with his homophobia?
|Suppose I ask Mr. Cochran what is orientation is.  And suppose he says
|he's homosexual.  Then why would he use homosexual anal sex as an insult
|to others?  

Rub two neurons together and perhaps you could come to a reasonable
conclusion.  See my hints quoted above.

|							  Now suppose he
|says he's heterosexual.

Wait till this happens before you leap to further conclusions.

Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Date: 4 Sep 92 03:35:09 GMT
Organization: Who, me???

In article <BtMBBC.6pJ@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM> jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods) writes:
>In <2a9a7689.crud@crud.mn.org> trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug15.160012.7813@rotag.mi.org>
>>        kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) tells John Woods:
>>]Bumper stickers are typically printed in bulk, not just singly, so there is a
>>]presumption that anything seen on a bumper sticker is some sort of political
>>]or social statement, rather than a personal revelation. Your analogy sucks.
>>
>>Notice how Kebbie argues on the basis of postulates that he accepts on
>>faith (and expects us to accept), 

Not faith, Barely, EXPERIENCE. I worked in the graphical arts for quite a
few years, remember? The cost and lead time of printing up bumper stickers
makes it an almost impossible medium for expressing transient thoughts or
emotions.

>>then proceeds by inference to a conclusion.

Just because you don't comprehend logical inference is no reason to criticize
it, Barely.

>And maintaining his high quality standards, even his inference is bogus.

According to your blatant assertion?!?! Let's hear a refutation before you
start declaring things "bogus", hmmm?

>>_Kebbie refuses to accept the real universe._  His paranoid intellect
>>is a refuge from society.

After such a shoddy job of refutation, do you really think you have a right
to make these ridiculous leaps of fancy, Barely? It's not like you've 
established any credibility in any field except marvelling at snowflakes,
after all...

>Paranoid, yes.  But I'd hardly call it "intellect".

Hmmmm... Yeah, "omniscience" would be more like it, relative to yours.

								- Kevin
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Wow (was Re: The world according to propeller-boy - part 1)
Keywords: From: decay@
Date: 25 Aug 92 13:41:11 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.


Hmm, propeller-boy...          8-D:-)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   "This must be Thursday.  I never could get the hang of Thursdays"
                                                          - D Adams
  - Patrick Taylor
    Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se             "Don't let the .se fool you"
    alternately, exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org
From: ksand@apple.com (Kent Sandvik)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Biblical errors
Date: 27 Aug 92 00:02:57 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Apple

In article <1992Aug20.173629.13134@linus.mitre.org>, m23364@mwunix (James
Meritt) wrote:
> 
> In article <1992Aug20.135427.2385@cs.joensuu.fi> asiivo@cs.joensuu.fi (Antti Siivonen) writes:
> }jmeritt@rod.mitre.org (Jim Meritt) writes:
> }
> }
> }>I've had a little success with the historical error collections (send more,
> }>including things like anachronisms), now how about flat-out biblical errors?
> }>Things like the famous "pi=3" and "grasshopper with four legs".
> }
> }	Neither of them is an error, sorry. 
> 
> Not to you, Antti.  Your world is so idiotic that Behind the Looking Glass
> would look sane by comparison.

I'm personally fascinated to speak/argue with people where common sense
stops and fanatical eager takes over. It's a very intriguing psychological
situation. Sometimes it's a dangerous one, but I'm not afraid of people 
that believe pi=3 and that grasshoppers have four legs. Unless they 
teach biology to my son :-).

Cheers,
Kent

---
"George, sorry but I do look much better in my running shorts than you and
Bill..."
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods)
Subject: Re: DAC: "I smoked, and maybe I _did_ inhale..." (was Re: F Chaney
Organization: Misanthropes-R-Us
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 00:58:29 GMT

In <lefty-250892124128@lefty.apple.com> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>In article <1992Aug25.002409.12014@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu
>(Stephen A Chaney) advises DAC:
>> People don't suddenly start showing up on talk.abortion to fight a flame
>> war against one person in particular, unless that one person is a
>> flamelord who is blasting pro-aborts senseless, and the situation clearly
>> calls for extra help.
>Now, as far as your being a "flamelord" is concerned, all I can tell you is
>that you'd better get the infirmary to cut back the dosage on your
>medication a tad.  You seem to be hallucinating.

It's not necessarily hallucinations.  He's probably just misinterpreting the
smoke billowing out of his ears every time he tries to make sense of those
fascinating pattern of lights on his terminal screen.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: gritzner@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Thomas F. Gritzner)
Subject: Steve Buffum Has Made It (was Re: The Tim 'n' Tom Show!)
Keywords: crash, putz, idiot, Cherrystone clam (why should I edit this? harhar!)
Followup-To: alt.flame,alt.religion.kibology
Originator: gritzner@sunbroy28.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 08:46:16 GMT


Seldom is the case that I have to give head, but

In article <78499@ut-emx.uucp>, swb@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Steve Buffum) writes:
>(great stuff, please repost or continue)

MUNICH (xrx). The last day before his great vacation the ambulance has taken off
Thomas G. from his terminal to the next hospital. Thomas G. has been found with
a convulsive laughter. The present doctor replies that the case is very serious.
The concerned himself shouts between the laughs ``Steve Buffum!! Steve Buffum!!
I'll capitulate!! I'll capitulate!!'' (the text has been later confirmed by
Thomas G.).
  The speaker of UseNet said that this were another example for the dangerousity
of the alt hierarchy, so there could be serious deliberations by the side of the
News.Admin.Council to recommend installing alt hierarchy groups NOT and detaching
previously accepted alt hierarchy groups.
  Thomas G. is currently well up and is able to go home from hospital. He says,
``this was the greatest respect I ever earned as an alt.flamer.''
  ``This shows'', he continues, ``that serious flamer behaviour, whatever this
could be besides avoiding primitive-talk insults, also earns his attention. I am
highly indebted to Tim O'D. and Steve Buffum (*).''

--------------------------------------------------------
(*) the true name has been mentioned in agree with its holder.
--
		Thomas F. Gritzner
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: And Now, You're A Coatrack!! Was: without even being asked ....
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 04:32:59 GMT

In article <Btt0Kn.4qM@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM> jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods) writes:
>In <lefty-280892110716@lefty.apple.com> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>>In article <Btnrt0.3uK@cs.dal.ca>, franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin)
>>wrote:
>>> [ yadda yadda yadda ] 
>>>    Where oh where have demonstrated any loss of confidence or self-image
>>> Leftie?
>>Then there's a small matter of _several_ pieces of email in which you
>>insist, with varying degrees of desperation, that:
>>  o  You've somehow accomplished great, and unspecified, things in the 
>>     nineteen years of your existence and that I should, for some reason, 
>>     respect you for this.
>
>I'm sure that leading "1" in "19" ought to have been a leading "0".  

What makes you so sure of this, ignoramus? Is "9" a valid octal character,
for instance?

>After all, Stevie is one of the leading zeroes on the net today.

Oh, I see, you were desperate to flame Franklin, and all you could manage was 
this lame, tenuous connection to his age. Leading-digit flames. Impressive.

								- Kevin
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Testttttt!
Date: 4 Sep 92 16:49:55 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton

Test test test test test test test test test testtttt!!!!!
Hope this pisses someone off.  Ha ha hahahahhahah!!!  Because I'm
getting really bored around here watching Franklin, Darcy, and Chaney get
skinned alive and I haven't kept up with the postings enough to join in.
So flame me, my grammar, my speeling (ha ha ha!) go ahead I dare ya!
I did flame Robinson but his reply has posted on my shitty reader yet so
another day unfortunately passes in which I don't get to insult a TEXXANN.
If your going to rag on Scranton, please be kind enough to say where your from
so that I have some material to work with.

					Fuck-You Very Much,
					Troll

P.S. Whar are ya Bur ya mangy cur?  (ha ha ha a rhyme!)   

P.P.S. Hey Rob, could you repost your reply to "Mr. Robinson's Neighborhood"?
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12337 alt.fan.kevin-darcy:355