HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dbose@aem.umn.edu (Deepak Bose)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: Imbecile Annons' Questions. ( Was Re: Moslems@)
Date: 1 Jan 93 20:01:53 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota

imustafa@slate.mines.colorado.edu (MUSTAFA IBRAHIM ) writes:

>	But my baby still does  not know how to wash . simply 
>because she has not read the Quran yet.


	How mean of you MUSTAFA ! Everyone knows you are an IDIOT, but

	you should not talk like this about your daughter .

	By the way , how old is she ?
From: hyder@cs.utexas.edu (Syed Irfan Hyder)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: pakistan: lesson
Date: 21 Dec 1992 14:38:45 -0600
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
Distribution: soc
NNTP-Posting-Host: pageboy.cs.utexas.edu

In article <1992Dec19.4739.24183@dosgate> "faraz rabbani" <faraz.rabbani@canrem.com> writes:
:To: hyder@cs.utexas.edu
:
:SIH: The lessons of this history are simple, and as follows:
:
: SIH: Iqbal sees a dream.
: SIH: Jinnah and his men turn it into "a" reality through hard work,
: SIH: perserverance, dedication and untiring resolve.
: SIH: [Note the quotes on "a"]
: SIH: The inheritors of the reality  destroy the dream and its reality by
: SIH: their stupidity, selfishness, pettiness, bickering and irrelvance.
:
: SIH: Then the inheritors find themselves in a sudden realization of their
: SIH: state. Instead of criticizing their own ineptitude, they start
: SIH: criticizing the founding fathers!
:
: SIH: The criticizm, however legitimate, will never be appropriate coming
: SIH: from the mouths of the Pakistanis __ the inheritors of the dream!
:
:This is amazingly put! Brilliant! Is the book forthcoming? Seriously!
:
:And we even have the brilliant Punjabi vs.  Sindhi vs.  Baluchi vs.
:Mohajir bickering  that gives us such unity and self-love...
:
:Faraz Rabbani                 
:

Dear Faraz.
	
The lesson is simple. Let's dream a dream like Iqbal.
Let's dream to eliminate Punjabi vs.  Sindhi vs.  Baluchi vs.
Mohajir bickering. Then, work hard like Jinnah and make it
a reality.

P.S.
Don't worry about the book. It is for the critics and historians
to write. Let's be  busy. Make history, instead of writing or criticizing
it.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: dbose@aem.umn.edu (Deepak Bose)
Subject: Re: Quaid-e-Azam's Birth Day
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 21:58:46 GMT

shamim@onyx.egr.msu.edu (Tariq Shamim) writes:


>To all Pakistanis and Freedom lovers,

>Happy Quaid Day (25 December)!!!!

>Please pay your tributes to the Founder of Pakistan, Quaid-e-Azam (Great Leader)
>Mohammed Ali Jinnah.  Only very few individuals can change the course of history
>or change the map of the world, he did both of them.  

>Tariq Shamim
>Mechanical Engineering
>Michigan State University


	HOW SAD 

		JESUS CHRIST AND Jinnah WERE BORN ON THE SAME DAY .

		 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: "faraz rabbani" <faraz.rabbani@canrem.com>
Subject: re: muslims - first line
Reply-To: "faraz rabbani" <faraz.rabbani@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: soc
Date: 21 Dec 92 20:57:59 EST

To: rairan@ecf.toronto.edu (RAI Ranjan)

> DB> I WOULD BE VERY GLAD TO ENLIGHTEN YOU ON HINDUISM , BUT BEFORE THAT
> DB> COULD YOU PLEASE CLARIFY SOME OF MY NUMEROUS DOUBTS ABOUT YOUR
> DB> HOLY RELIGION
> DB> 1) WHY DO YOU GUYS CHOP-OFF YOUE P*N*S AT ONE END ?????
>
> It is called circumcision and it is for hygiene and health purposed
> (scientifically proven)...
> Faraz Rabbani

 RR> Hindus are not circumcised because there was never really a need for
 RR> it in India.

But this does not in any way condone what Mr.  "DB" (whom I quote
above) said. His article is based on ignorant HinduversusMuslimism.

Faraz Rabbani

... BATHROOM HUMOR:  We aim to please, could you aim too please?!
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.11
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: ahmed@cs.tcd.ie (El-Habbash Ahmed)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: Pakistan
Date: 24 Dec 92 15:21:33 GMT
Organization: Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin

jakhan@IASTATE.EDU (Javed Ahmed Khan) writes:



>Syed Irfan Hyder writes:

>==============================================================================
>>Doesn't answer the question. Why is a *political state* required to establish
>>an "islamic" society ?

>Answer is very simple. Islam is a DEEN, not a religion.
>It has "laws" and "regulations" that need the political instrument
>of the "state" for their enforcement. As Islam is not simply
>some obscure set of rituals that can be practiced in isolation
>it needs some political expression. Remember need for the Medinite
>State?
>=============================================================================


>I had some questions. 

>How is the DEEN of Islam (if we were to accept that Islam was not "just another
>religion") different from the civic laws of today?

>Why is it necessary to cause such convulsion in human history, cause so many
>innocent deaths to bring in something which, IMO, is already part of the civic
>laws of any civilised society?

>Take the spirit and intent of the laws in any society and one can see the
>amazing similarity in the guiding principles which shaped the laws of society.

In fact all the laws of any society are tailored to emforce certain
aspects of whatever system available in the society, and to protect the
interests of the people who are contributing effectively to the system.

The laws you are talking about:

- Do not forbid interest, in the banking system, because this is a main 
  feature of capitalism.

- do not forbid free sex, because this makes it easy to exploit women.

- Do not forbid intoxicants, gambling, ...

This is just a simple example which shows how such laws contradict with
Islam. 

Islam is a System and must have its laws to protect the interest of this
system. It should not be understood that the laws of Islam will force
people to become Muslim. It is a divine system which is made for the
interest of all people not just the people who are running the system,
be they capitalists or communists or whatever.

>Why is there a compelling need to drive a wedge between peoples in the name of
>religion ?

Why capitalism, communism or secularism do not drive such wedges ?

They do, and you will find many people who are not satisfied, but who
cares!!!!
While in a muslim state, the law is part of your Deen. You must know it
and you have to accept it, or what is the meaning of declaring yourself
as a Muslim. 

For the nonmuslims, the law in Islam, has many similarities
with the civic laws in many of the non-islamic countries, so why
shouldn't it be accepted? An Islamic law gives more consideration to
morals, and I don't think nonmuslims would object to that.


Ahmed
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: ahmedss@ntmtv.UUCP (Syed Ahmed)
Subject: Re: Victory Day in Bangladesh !!!
Originator: ahmedss@gassendi
Reply-To: ahmedss@ntmtv.UUCP (Syed Ahmed)
Organization: Northern Telecom Inc, Mountain View, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 22:15:15 GMT


>(Syed Ahmed) writes...

>Sure it may be celebrations for the people in Bangladesh today, and I wish them
>well, but theres just one thing that I donot understand:
>WE USED TO LIVE IN DHAKA, IN FACT AT 16 CANTT BAZAR AREA. I WAS JUST 10 AND THE
>ELDEST OF 4 BROTHERS AND TWO SISTERS. WE ESCAPED WITH OUR LIVES ON THE "10TH OF 
>MARCH 1971". TELL ME WHY WOULD THE HEROIC PEOPLE OF BANGLADESH WANT TO KILL US!!
> 
>A PAKISTANI.

to which replies:(KHAN, SHAHRIAR)

>>	We used to live in 57 Cantt. Bazar Area and later moved to 53 Cantt. 
>>	Bazar Area. Your question has no answer; just like countless other 
>>	questions Bangladeshis have about the war.  


No Sir!!!
The question has an anwser, i.e., The Marauding Gang of Mukti_Bahini were
already Killing innocent Non-Bengali's much before the notorious Army Action , 
which started on the 25th of March, of the year of Mass Execution of "Beehari's". 

A Survivor of the Non_Bengali Holocaust.
From: "faraz rabbani" <faraz.rabbani@canrem.com>
Subject: pakistani in paris
Reply-To: "faraz rabbani" <faraz.rabbani@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: soc
Date: 23 Dec 92 13:40:11 EST


                The Indian Dude in Paris.
                *************************
                
There was once a Indian dude, and a dumb Indian dude at that,
who had just fulfilled his life ambition and was visiting Paris.

While walking in a dark, dimly lit alley behind the Champs Elysees,
the Indian dude suddenly stopped.  He had seen a piece of turd in
front of him.

He exclaimed, "Oh, my Gaad!  Shit!", but then added, "Oh, no, but
not in Paris! Maybe in Calcutta, but not in Paris!"

He looked at it carefully, from several very close angles and
muttered, rather bewildered, "Oh my Gaad!  Certainly LOOKS like
shit... Oh no, but not in Paris..."

He then sniffed at it.  He sniffed again, as if enjoying the smell.
And again.  Eventually, he mumbled, "Hmmmm....  it SMELLS like
shit...  Oh no, but not in Paris..."

He took another sniff at it and, after a tinge of reluctance, dabbed
his fingers in it. He rubbed both hands together, as if
soaping them.  Quite baffled, and still looking at the turd and
smelling it, the Indian dude exclaimed to no one, "Well, it
certainly FEELS like shit and.... Oh, no! But not in Paris!

The Indian dude then put his middle finger in his mouth and
tasted the turd. Unsatisfied, he tasted some more.

Suddenly, he got up and almost shouted in relief, "Oh my Gaad!  It
*IS* shit!! THANK GAAD I DID NOT STEP IN IT!!!

                                                                  
Faraz Rabbani
                                                                  
... O.P.P. (One Powerful Paki)  



... Never Accept A Drink From a Urologist...
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.11
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Xref: sparky soc.culture.pakistan:18938 soc.culture.indian:42273 soc.culture.bangladesh:7179
From: salama@topaz.ucq.edu.au
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.bangladesh
Subject: Re: The Quran and the Modern Science
Date: 30 Dec 92 01:12:16 GMT
Organization: UCQ

In article <1ho88dINNkgd@aludra.usc.edu>, fafat@aludra.usc.edu (Vijay Fafat) writes:
> Salam writes:
>>>In article <1992Dec27.212218.45921@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>, dchatterjee@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>>      Do you want to imply that the people who are not physicists have no
>>idea of the modern theory of cosmology? It is not the precise mathematical
>>theories but "a general concept concerning the formation of the Universe",
>>outlined in the Qur'an. Read the text carefully.
> 
> 	A "general concept" without any basis is not very useful and certainly
> 	does'nt allow a conclusion that Muhammad knew what he was talking 
> 	about in the sense of corresponding to observational reality.

      The general concept is never for any scientific use. It is quite
possible that Muhammad (SW) didn't know the exact details or He might knew,
who knows, but God definitely knew and knows what he had revealed to his
prophet.

> 
>>>   (2) The word "data" appears in the above passage. What data is being
>>>       referred to here ?
>>
>>    Read the above remarks again.
> 
> 	Unfair, IMO. The OP clearly made a tall claim, throwing in agreement
> 	with "data" without saying what it was (if any, i.e.)
> 
       What is this IMO?
       You are taking the word "data" literally and trying to make something
out of that. It is a reference to the details given in Qur'an. Some of them
are discussed in the book. BTW, the original article (paper) was in French.

> 
>>     Yes, any religious text/scripture contains such statements, but the point
>>raised by Dr. Buacille is that the statements in the Qur'an are not "mystic".
>>They are simple, sensible and intelligible.
> 
> 	Even Aristotle was intelligible. But in no way connected with
> 	"reality".
> 
> 
         You are again doing the samething as you did before. Yes Aristotle
was not connected with "reality", but the Qur'an is.

         
>>      Yes, not only Egyptians but Chinese and Indians also had advanced
>>scientific knowledge BUT only through the scientific investigations and 
>>NOT as a revealation from God. The point is a person like Muhammad (SW)
>>and the society of His time and space couldn't produce anything like that
>>from the existing knowledge.
> 
> 	The scientific achievements of the former left tell-tale marks.
> 	Muhammad's speculations did no such things and as such, imagination
> 	does'nt need "existing knowledge". 
>
         That is exactly what Dr. B has made clear that the Qur'an is neither
a book of scientific achievements nor any one's speculations. It wasn't
dependent on "existing knowledge". IT IS DIVINE. Dr.B reached this conclusion
after an objective study of Qur'an. He found nothing in the Qur'an which
contradicts well known scientific knowledge instead there is a great deal
of agreements.


 
> 	FFT
> 
> 
> 
       Salam.
From: dbose@aem.umn.edu (Deepak Bose)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: WANTED DEEPAK BOSE E-MAIL ADDRESS?
Date: 30 Dec 92 23:45:48 GMT
Distribution: WORLD
Organization: University of Minnesota

news@ccu.umanitoba.ca writes:
>     HE IS AN ASSHOLE .
>                             
>MAUD AHMAD CHAUDHARY
>umchaud2@ccu.umanitoba.ca

TERI MA KI ......
From: budaraju@cae.wisc.edu (Srinivas Budaraju)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: Pakistan
Date: 27 Dec 92 23:06:06 GMT
Organization: U of Wisconsin-Madison College of Engineering

In article <ljmsstINN4qh@pageboy.cs.utexas.edu> hyder@cs.utexas.edu (Syed Irfan Hyder) writes:
>In article <BzqCHA.Mo7@ucunix.san.uc.edu> bhatnagr@ucunix.san.uc.edu writes:
>>Would you please write a couple of phrases in English that capture the
>>semantics of the word "DEEN" in its original language?
>In Quran the word DEEN has been used in the following four meanings
>1.	Sovereignty and Supreme Authority
>2.	Obedience and Submission to such Authority
>3.	The system of thought and action established through 
>		the exercise of that authority
>4.	Retribution meted out by the authority, in consideration 
>	of loyalty and obedience to it, or rebellion and transgression
>
>As such DEEN encompasses all the reasons d'etre of a "state".
						       ^^^^^
I think that this is just one of the possible interpretations (given 
for example by Maulana Maduadi). Other interpretation, given by Maulana
Wahiduddin Khan, is clear from his criticism of those for whom the
main purpose of Islam is to establish a political system:

"These people, because of their mental attitude, have come to view 'din'
in the form of political order (riyasti nizam). For them 'din' has to
do with things government (hukumati umar) and not with personal reform
(dhati islah). They conceive it as their religious responsibility to
establish and to implement 'din' as a political order on this earth.
Yet, since in the Koran there is no verse from which a 'dini' mission
of this kind could be derived, therefore, their mind has devised the
easy way of twisting the meaning of personal injunctions (infradi
ahkham) into social ones (ijtima iyyat): 'weigh correctly' they take
to mean: 'correct the scales of the people.'"

-Srinivas				budaraju@cae.wisc.edu
From: fxm4993@hertz.njit.edu (Farhan Muhammad)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: Mussalmano'n ko christmas kaa faa'idaa!
Date: 24 Dec 92 16:47:55 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1hbe4iINNsp2@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> khan@ces.cwru.edu (Mansoor Khan) writes:
>
>	Christmas kaa Faa'idaa
>	----------------------
>
>	Roses are reddish
>	Violets are bluish
>	If it weren't for Christmas
>	We'd all be jewish
>
>Mansoor Khan
>Cleveland

	WOW WOW WOW..
	Mansoor sometimes you could be a real genius..:-)))
	
-- 
To people                                          | 
Sky is the limit                      ____________(:)____________ 
To me                    BORN TO FLY            |  |  |
Its my home...          ------------            0  o  0
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.indian
From: dbose@aem.umn.edu (Deepak Bose)
Subject: Re: Appology demmanded from dchatterjee
Organization: University of Minnesota
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 21:38:24 GMT

mannan@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (D RIGHT 1) writes:

>In article <dbose.725921132@sirocco.aem.umn.edu> dbose@aem.umn.edu (Deepak Bose) writes:
>>das@meavax.nrrc.ncsu.edu writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>	Nadaan Bachche ghar jaa ke so jaa .
>>
>>						DEEPAK
>I bet this guy was one of the person who flew back from Ayoddah?? after
>he broke the dome of the mosque!! What a stupid irrational and stupid
>person. He is probably one of the untouchables in India escaped racism
>in India and empties the junk from inside his frustrated and desperate
>mind in soc.culture.XXXXXX Mr. Deepak you should not wait till you are
>dead I think its time for you to jump in the Ganga and save the world
>from someone who is as stupid as you are. 

>You sir are a Hatemunger! and so am I for people like you!

>-- 
>I am Crazy!!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
YOU SAID IT !!

Xref: sparky soc.culture.pakistan:19049 soc.culture.indian:42567 soc.culture.bangladesh:7244
From: gardner@convex.com (Steve Gardner)
Subject: Re: Question to Steve (was Re: The Quran and the Modern Science)
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 17:33:20 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In article <1993Jan1.032336.2339@ucbeh.san.uc.edu> minhaszt@ucbeh.san.uc.edu writes:
>no. science does not call it superstition. scientists, and atheist scientists
>do that. do not mix up science with "scientists". they are two different
>entities and never the two shall meet.
	Science is based on empirical testing of hypotheses.  Religion is
	based on faith. Faith can be used to justify any hypothesis.  That
	is why it is worthless for discovering truth.  People are capable
	of having faith in any thing they choose. Empirical, objective facts
	need not intrude so agreement can only be coerced between members of
	different faiths never persuaded by rational means.  This is the 
	reason for religious wars.  Science unites people, faith divides
	them. Muslims, Hindus, Christians, Jews, Buddhists, and even infidel 
	scum like myself ;-) can agree on electromagnetic theory because no 
	faith is necessary.  We can prove to each other the results of 
	science.  You cannot prove your faith to anyone except a person who
	already believes or wants to believe what you say.  Therefore you 
	must intimidate the infidel to win his adherence. Thus, the hindu
	will continue hating the muslim who will continue hating the christian
	who will continue hating the jew . . . and this sorry state of affairs
	will continue until people stop thinking that god whispers golden
	nuggets of revealed truth directly into their pious ears with no 
	reality check necessary.  Those of you who make blind faith a virtue
	only hasten the spread of hate.
	

>oh btw "scientists" from muslim countries do not call the closeness of what 
>the quran says about natural phenomenon with what is generally observed as
>"superstitious". what is your opinion about them?
	Of course scientists in muslim countries don't call anything in
	the quran superstition.  They are not stupid.  They have heard
	of Salman Rushdie.  They know the fate of those who upset the 
	religious "leaders" of Islam.  Who do you think you are kidding?

	If Islam were the obvious truth you claim it to be then why is it 
	necessary to intimidate those offend with their lack of faith? 
	Salman Rushdie would be the object of scorn perhaps, but never the
	object of a death sentence.  How many people who believe silly things
	about science (e.g. people who believe that perpetual motion machines
	are possible) are ever persecuted?  Ask yourself why!  (And for 
	crying out loud stop trying to fool people with such transparent
	sophistry).


								smg

Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: mcsorley@acuson.com (Sean Mcsorley)
Subject: ignore this post
Summary: test
Keywords: test
Organization: Acuson; Mountain View, California
Distribution: soc
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 23:10:35 GMT

this is a test
:wq

Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.indian
From: nd3375@meibm5.cen.uiuc.edu (Nishit Dey)
Subject: Re: Difference
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:28:19 GMT


In article <1992Dec20.194821.1645@slate.mines.colorado.edu>, imustafa@slate.mines.colorado.edu (MUSTAFA IBRAHIM ) writes:
>> 
>> 
>> 	Q.  What is the difference between man and animal ?
>> 
>> 	A.  Religion

	A. Man can think logically and like you animal can't think.


Nishit
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: dbose@aem.umn.edu (Deepak Bose)
Subject: Re: Mustafa Ibrahim's brilliant wit!
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 22:00:03 GMT

an4277@anon.penet.fi writes:

>And as for that Deepak Bose character, the cretin is an insult to
>humanity. I hope for his own sake that he's not ugly because if he
>is, and I have a feeling that he is, he better not run into me. Being
>ugly for you is one too many man! 

>I won't like you at all, Deepak Bose because you're  stupid, vile
>and ugly. You're a disgrace to humans Deepak. A word of advice to
>his friends: Guys put a leash on this one!



	ABEY O' ANONYMOUS # 4277 (ANON. BAAP KA 4277th PUTTAR ) 


		ARE HAMSE ITNA DARTA KYON HAI RE TU ? 

		KYA SOCH KE ANONYMOUS BANA THA , KE DEEPAK KHUS

		HOGA ? SABASI DEGA , KYON ?

		ABEY O' HIMMAT HAI TO APNA NAAM BATA .

					DEEPAK
From: ahussain@prism.poly.edu (Arshad Hussain)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: To FOCKING Mustafa Ibrahim
Date: 21 Dec 92 14:59:55 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Polytechnic University, New York


Founder Of Committee for the Killing of Islamic Nations Globally(FOCKING)
Mustafa Ibrahim: Shut up!!
Xref: sparky soc.culture.pakistan:18659 soc.culture.bangladesh:6996
From: srahman@seas.gwu.edu (Shafiq-ur Rahman)
Subject: Re: Hey cousin!
Organization: George Washington University
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 07:00:21 GMT

In article  khan@ces.cwru.edu (Mansoor Khan) writes:

>	What are the advantages of cousin marriages?
        Risks of 'slip of tounge' are minimized(  Talaaq Talaaq Talaaq).

>	What are the disadvantages of cousin marriages( in-breeding)?
        Foundation of Shia sect: No Happy New Year. 

>	How about cousin marriages generation after generation?
        Deep S-it.

Arshad Hussain  ahussain@prism.poly.edu
Xref: sparky soc.culture.pakistan:18602 soc.culture.bangladesh:6949 soc.culture.indian:41650
From: prasanth@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Ravi K. Prasanth)
Subject: Re: The Quran and the Modern Science
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 93 19:15:19 GMT

In article <1i293pINNen3@aludra.usc.edu>, fafat@aludra.usc.edu (Vijay Fafat) writes:
> 	to demons and Gods. Of course, one *could* try and "rationalize"
> 	the idea of God but that does'nt fit into the current framework
> 	as yet and is best left for the metaphysicists.

Depends on what you mean by God. Arthur Eddington writes about
how science can study a "relative Absolute" in his book "Space 
Time and Gravitation". Compare that with non-dualistic notions
of God (Nirguna/Saguna) (Ref:Philosophy of a Guru by Nataraja 
Guru).

> 	To that extent, Science does not accept the supernatural.
> 
> 	FFT

RKP
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: mac1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Mubashir Cheema)
Subject: Imran Anwar's address required
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 01:19:29 GMT

I would like to know the email address of Ashar Nisar who wrote the 
article entitled "Wall Street Journal article by Imran Anwar." I would
reaaly appreciate if anybody could help me in this regard.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan