HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v999qx29@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 150 F-16 to Taiwan
Date: 6 Sep 92 16:29:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <65500094@acf3.NYU.EDU>, yangze@acf3.NYU.EDU (Ze Yang, , , ) writes...
> 
>Why did you use the word "even", there is no doubt in most ereas, their
>technology is incomparative to ours, only in a few ereas, because
>the USA has a weaker control on technology export to them, they
>do better than mainland.
>They are eventually feeded up by USA, they do not have too much things
>feel proud of.
> 
>Ze Yang

Have you been hurt by some Taiwanese who look down at you because you are
not as rich as they? Once again, instead of speaking something to put down
Taiwanese so you will feel less hurt, do your best to improve mainland.
When mainland is as democratic and wealthy as Taiwan , every prolem will
be solved. Your statement remind me of KMT's words : CCP was fed up by
USSR and people in mainland are just slaves of Russian. Cold war is over.
Think about what make Taiwanese and mainlanders still pointing guns against
each other. Isn't it the fear that someone will take away everything Taiwanese
earned by hard work in the past. Mainlander have nothing to lose if it happen
anyway. Look at the flood in mainland, there are many Taiwanese helping
mainlanders rebuilding their home. Blood is thicker than water. But if you
attack your brother, the hatred will be even worse than others' attack.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Shall we support CCP use force to TI?
Supersedes: <92259.145429IO11043@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Tuesday, 15 Sep 1992 15:45:31 EDT
From: <IO11043@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>

IMHO, I'll never support any action using armed force to TI, if
TI is the choise of most people in Taiwan. Don't blame me on this ptn.
But in my heart, I hope Taiwan will eventually unite with the mainland
in a peace way whatsoever. The good thing is we don't have ethnic or
religion problems and culture difference is unlike what we imagine. So
those diasters happening in Balkan will not be likely happening in both
sides of the strait. Chinese doesn't need any war anyway unlike someone
suggested earlier in the net.

On the other hand, if there are some people who want to get Taiwan
independent from China, there's still no need to use force to solve the
problem providing both sides(pro-TIers and anti-TIers) in peaceful way.
In reality, unification will be determined mostly by people living
in Taiwan. We people living in other places in China have not too much
to do with it. But we can enhance the strength of anti-TI people in Taiwan by
our all kinds of supports except force threatening which would make
anything more complex and helpless.

Economy may be the key point for unification. So strengthening business
conection will surely benifit unification.

I guess the unification will not happen under the leadership of CCP.
But if there's a coup or sever anti-government event in Taiwan, things
may be changed.

One thing I have to say before I finish, don't call me *** agent
if you don't agree with me :-).
===================================
Robert Pan               Telephone: (207) 581-2298 Office
                                    (207) 827-8823 Home
Apt B, 1 Hayes St.       Internet: io11043@maine.maine.edu
Old Town, ME 04468-1117    Bitnet: io11043@maine
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: zzhang@electron.rutgers.edu (ZhiZhong Zhang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: test
Keywords: test
Date: 11 Sep 92 16:08:33 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

this is a test
From: peng@castle.ed.ac.uk (W Peng)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: test
Date: 6 Sep 92 11:10:30 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University


Test!!!!
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: a@b.c.d
Subject: test
Originator: a@b.c.d
Organization: dontcare
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 16:56:59 GMT

test
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: zhuh@athena.mit.edu (Hui Zhu)
Subject: Re: Questions about "Shen Tong (grabbed)"
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 18:57:32 GMT

In article <1992Sep4.201206.13163@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, ykhsu@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (yung-kao.hsu) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep4.144225.388@athena.mit.edu> zhuh@athena.mit.edu (Hui Zhu) writes:
|> >In article <1992Sep4.130058.23723@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, ykhsu@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (yung-kao.hsu) writes:
|> >|> 
|> >|> 	Sure, some organizations will put pressure on CCP to
|> >|> 	release him; but putting yourself in his position, there
|> >|> 	are still great uncerntainties and how many people will
|> >|> 	take that risk? At least not me.
|> >
|> >Haha, I am really confused by you guys.  I am wondering whether you guys
|> >really know it or not, or simply pretend to be stupid(zhuang1 hu2 tu).
|> 
|> 	I am only me; there is no "you guys".

Ok, only you this time. :) Then did you preten to be stupid(zhuang1 hu2 tu)?


|> >You mean this ST guy is not "protected"?  Then what's the hell US congress men
|> >or many other "foreign devils" shouted loudly after his detention and
|> >...
|> >Fortunately,  this is not in those old days, US navy soilders can rape Chinese
|> >student and NOT guilty!  
|> 
|> 	I am impressed with your overwhelming nationism tone.
|> 	May you cntinue to appreciate and enjoy your government with
|> 	this emotion because that is the best your beloved government
|> 	has to offer to comfort the people who suffer her ruling.

Hmm, boy, why can't you go back to the real point and make your day? :)

Simply attacking me with this kind of thing makes NO sense. Understand? :)


Newsgroups: alt.culture.cashmir,soc.culture.china,soc.culture.afghanistan,soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.pakistan
From: thaya@Siri.Unit.NO (Thayanantha Balasundaram)
Subject: batting
Followup-To: m
Keywords: you do not care me,have yuo seen Solai,tell me the truth,we fought for
          own india,he has morden f***king metodes,have you gotten rights
Organization: Norwegian Institue of Technology
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 92 14:47:20 GMT


\(TAMIL)
      nilaak kaayuthu
      nEram nalla nEram
      nencham paayuthu
      kaaman vidum paaNam
      nilaak kaayuthu
      nEram nalla nEram
      nencham paayuthu
      kaaman vidum paaNam
      thookkam vallai maamaa
      kaakka vaikka laamaa
      Akki vaissa sOtthai
      ARap pOda laamaa
(An)  nilaak kaayuthu
      nEram nalla nEram
      nencham paayuthu
      kaaman vidum paaNam

(peN) thennaNGkIRRum pooNGkaaRRum
      enna paNNnuthO
(An)  unnai pOla thOLaitthoddu
      pinnik koLLuthO
(peN) thennaNGkIRRum pooNGkaaRRum
      enna paNNnuthO
(An)  unnai pOla thOLaitthoddu
      pinnik koLLuthO
(peN) vekkam pidikkuthu poRutthukkaiyaa
      athu vilakip pOnathum edutthukkaiyaa
(An)  kaddil pOddathum therinchukkanum
      kollaip pakkam othuNGkidap purinchukkanum
(peN) ammaadi....
      athuk kenna avasaramO

(An)  nilaak kaayuthu
(peN) A
(An)  nEram nalla nEram
(peN) A kaa
(An)  nencham paayuthu
(peN) A
(An)  kaaman vidum paaNam

(peN) m m
      m m
      m.... m
      m m m.... m
      m m A....
      sa sa sas sas sassaa
      A....
      sa sa sas sas sassaa
      A.... A
      sI

(An)  thaNNnIr kEdkum vEr kaNdEn
      thaakam thaNinchuthaa
(peN) atthaan thEvai naan thanthEn
      Asai kuRainchuthaa
(An)  koddik kidakkuthu UraLavu
      ithil veddi edutthathu OraLavu
(peN) inRu padutthathu ithu varaikkum
      ini naaLai iruppathu iruvarukkum
(An)  anpE nI....
      athisayas suraNGkamadi
(peN) nilaak kaayuthu
(An)  m
(peN) nEram nalla nEram
      nencham paayuthu
(An)  A
(peN) kaaman vidum paaNam
      thookkam vallai maamaa
      kaakka vaikka laamaa
      Akki vaissa sOtthai
      ARap pOda laamaa
(An)  nilaak kaayuthu
(peN) A
(An)  nEram nalla nEram
(peN) A kaa
(An)  nencham paayuthu
(peN) A
(An)  kaaman vidum paaNam


if some one disapoints then forgive me thanks
mainly yours 2
thayanantha
From: dliu@ark.njit.edu (Dong Liu (~{Au6+~}))
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Chinese Culture?
Date: 4 Sep 92 17:04:11 GMT
Distribution: all
Organization: Electrical and Computer Engineering, NJIT
X-News-Reader: GNUS 3.14.1 for GNU Emacs 18.58.3

This group is not alt.hackers or alt.sex, why there are always some
smart guys so enthusiastically try anonymous post? Is it something
related to Chinese culture?

Just wandering --dong
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: jchang@shmps.ohio-state.edu
Subject: Re: Insensitive mainland chauvinist view.
Originator: jchang@shmps.ohio-state.edu
Organization: University of Ohio, Computer Centre
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 11:54:13 GMT

For all you insensitive, bloody thirsty, chavinistic pigs from mainland,
go back to hell, that is where you belong.

For all you scum bags who want to take Taiwan using force, may your
descendants be cursed and suffer.

For all you shit face who hate Taiwanese and support CCP's agression
toward Taiwan, go home and f**k yourself.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns)
Subject: Re: a piece of un-confirmed good news
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 19:12:02 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.183202.6620@oracle.us.oracle.com> kwee@oracle.uucp (Karl  
Wee) writes:
> In article <2AA7E193.10397@news.service.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Mr Shannon  
Yeh) writes:
> >From an un-confirmable news source, someone in Beijing is heavily sick.  
> >This very possible death may bring the sick Have-Milk-Is-Mother philosophy 
> >to the end.
> >
> >_\_  ------  ---  \   ------   __\__ /---      /___     __\_/__
> >  |   /|    __|__|_   |----|    |--  /---      |--|    |-|---|--
> >  |  / | \    |/ |    |--|-     | | ---|---    |--|    |_-____-_|
> >  /\________ /|   \|  |/  \|    /\|    /\      |__|   ------|-----
> >							  \\|
> >
> >shannon
> >-------
> 
> This sounds very strange.  If you know who this "someone" is, why don't you
> say so?  I know you probably mean Deng, but why this "open secrecy"?
> 
> Also, who have the Have-Milk-Is-Mother philosophy?  Is this another double
> talk of yours?  What's the purpose of this double talk?  To show that you
> have some inside connections to the CCP?


After I saw his post yesterday promoting war among Chinese, I hope he is just a  
crazy man without any idea.

Carl
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: zheng@euch4c.chem.emory.edu
Subject: test
Organization: The Ohio State University; Department of Phyiscs
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 16:34:34 GMT


This is a test. Please ignore.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: chungdan@leland.Stanford.EDU (Zhong Qi Iao (Daniel))
Subject: [television/television] Chinese series, Japanese music C^inlanda serio, Japanlanda muziko (repost attempt)
Followup-To: soc.culture.taiwan
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 92 23:24:10 GMT

     It seems that there is problem mailing to "ucbvax.berkeley.edu".
So I am posting it from elsewhere to the newsgroup directly.
Follow-ups go to "Soc.Culture.Taiwan".

     Once I was in Taiwan, I heard music which sounded very close to "Macross"
in the television program.  I did not pay much attention.  Now, recently,
I heard the *definite* music of "Laputa" as background music in the Taiwan
televion series <below>.  While we often use classical music in television
 | |  |  -+-     +-- \ / /   --+ --- \   | |  |  -|  \  
 +-|  |  /|      |    X       |/ ++-     +-|  |  |--    
   |  |   +-     /   / \      |   //       |  |    /    
background, and in a place where some Japanese television in prohibited, even
there we see Japanese music used.  It shows the widespread of Japanese culture
in Taiwan.
  // / /     +-+ /   --- \ /  /       |  / / \    /  --- \  
 //  \/      |-+      \   X  /        |  \/      /   ++-    ("Macross" in
  |  --|     /        /  / \ ---      |  --|     --|  //    Chinese)

 -+-  |  -|      --- \ /  /      |||      //  /  /  	    ("Laputa" in
  /   |  |--      \   X  /       |+|     //  /      	    Chinese)
 --|  |    /      /  / \ ---     ---      |  ---    
     Iam, kiam mi estis en Tajvano, I au'dis en televido iun muzikon,
kiu son-aspektis tre simile al "Makroso" (Japana movbilda filmo).  Mi ne
tre atentis.  Nun, antau'-nelonge, mi definitive au'dis c^e la malantau'a
tero muzikon el "Laputo" (alia Japana movbilda filmo).  Kiam ni ofte
uzas klasikan muzikon sur televida malantau'a tero, kaj kie oni malpermesas
iujn Japanajn televidaj^ojn, ec^ tie oni vidis Japanan muzikon.  C^i tio
montras la enuo (?) de Japana kulturo.

					ZHONG Qi-Iao, U.S.A./Usono
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: yang-allan@CS.YALE.EDU (J. Allan Yang)
Subject: Re: Let Taiwan alone and develop China first. (Was: F-16's fear?)
Organization: Dept of CS, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-2158
	<1992Sep10.130317.3331@ducvax.auburn.edu>
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 15:59:38 GMT

 > From: haiqiu@ducvax.auburn.edu
 > Date: 10 Sep 92 18:03:17 GMT
 > References: <3531@babcock.cerc.wvu.wvnet.edu> <1992Sep10.002433.26281@cs.yale.edu>
 > .....
 > > Taiwan wants to buy those fighters, no matter who the President of
 > > US is. Taiwan is going to buy Mirage 2000 and possibly Mig-29, too.
 > > Advanced weaponry is needed to protect people in Taiwan from any
 > > force against their will.
 > 
 >     If Jiang Jie Shi couldn't possibly protect his government when his
 > army of full American Equipments is much stronger than the PLA which is
 > merely some ground troups only at that time. How could you expectly buying
 > a couple of airplane from USA can protect Taiwan now?

KMT completely lost the support of the people in the late 1940's.
Today you will be hard pressed to find even a single person in
Taiwan who supports CCP to take over Taiwan. This is due to their
understanding of the current situation in China after millions of
Taiwanese visited mainland, not because of the propaganda from the
KMT as it used to be years ago. There are so many broken hearts when
many see the homes they left 40 years ago became even shabbier and
the living condition of their relatives hardly got improved. And we
all saw what happened at Tienannmen as well.

 > > ...
 >     De2 min2 xin1 zhe3 de2 tian1 xia4, shi1 min2 xin1 zhe3 shi1 tian1 xia3.
 > That's for sure, despite of what ever weapon you have. Advanced weapon will
 > only increase the casualty and make the people suffer more, but it will not
 > change the fate on the side who do not have the support of the people.
 > 
 > ----HAMLET

You are being too naive. Did Saddam Hussein have the support of the
Kuwaitti? Why did he get to plunder and pillage Kuwait to his
heart's contents before US decided to kicked him out (for US's own
interest of course). If the Kuwatti had realized that they had a
real threat right beside them and had prepared well for it, the
nightmare might have been averted.

Who has the least support of the people in Taiwan is too obvious.
Unfortunately, that party has a stronger military clout. Hopefully
advanced weaponry will drastically raise the price they must pay if
they choose to gamble on an invasion. 

- Allan
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: claudius@leland.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu)
Subject: Re: I'm very disappointed in Chinese
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 92 01:01:53 GMT

In article <9226010.20198@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> dht@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Joyous Dave baby) writes:

>My life style is Australian, that's true.  BUT my values are Chinese,
>strong family values, believe in life-term friendships, respect for
>the elders, take control over my own studies, never give up when
>I fall, etc, etc.... that's what I think about deep inside.

I agree with most of your post, but I do not agree (partly) with this part.
"Strong family values" has never been part of Chinese culture, sadly.  Judging
from the fact that polygamy was glorified in the past, and still is to a
degree, and the fact that visiting prostitutes isn't considered anything
particularly dishonorable in Taiwan (and, from what I've read, in Hong Kong as
well), "strong family values" wasn't and still isn't a part of Chinese culture.
Having families stick together was a part, but so was having several wives.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li)
Subject: Re: Insensitive mainland chauvinist view. (Was: Who Cares 150 F-16s.)
    <1992Sep12.231414.10152@ms.uky.edu> <3132@ariel.its.unimelb.EDU.AU>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 14:24:49 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

jlam@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au (Lord Automato) writes:

>So what is your point? Keep CCP for another 50 years?
We were talking about if democracy should give the chance to seperate a country.
My answer is in the history, a lot of bad things happened when some one wanted
to seperate a country. So, not every one like to see this happen. About who
should be the leader of a country, we are listening to every one's "campion
speach", do not think most of people are fool. And if you want to be the
leader, let us know what you can do for us, why should we select you? If you
say " I'll let all the provinces to be independent, if they vote for it."
We'll think about it.

>Lin Can
>=========================================================================
>.-- .... --- . ...- . .-. -.. . -.-. --- -.. . ... - .... .. ...
>--. . - ... -. --- - .... .. -. --.        
>.-.. .. ..-. . .. ... ... .... --- .-. - .-- --- .-. -.- .... .- .-. -..
>                                                   .-.. .. -. -.-. .- -.
>=========================================================================
>                                          

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: jxu@black.clarku.edu (The Batman!!)
Subject: Green Card date?
Organization: Clark University (Worcester, MA)
Date: 10 Sep 92 17:11:43 GMT

Hello, I just wonder if anyone know the date of immigration date for
highly skilled talent, someone who has Ph.D.  Should the date received
on Sep, 10, 1992 for November day?  If anyone who has the information on that.
Please E-mailed to me.

My E-mail address is "jxu@black.clarku.edu"

Thanks in advances.
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jian Xu                                  Finger "jxu@black.clarku.edu"
School Address:                          Home Address:
Clark University                         211 Dewey Street
From: xyang@bcars279.UUCP
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: F-16's fear?
Date: 8 Sep 92 18:55:13 GMT
Reply-To: xyang@bnr.ca
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa, Canada

To those who drifted away from the original discussion
and started arguing about the sovereignty over Taiwan on the 
F-16 issue: especially those from Mainland, Hong bong, 
or Taiwan (or for short, let's just call it Great China like British 
call themselves Great Britain :-) ):
U.S. government is playing an old game again -- try to create
as much conflict as possible among Chinese territories so that
they can gain benefit from there. Any internal fight will
weaken the country and eventually lead to a loss at negotiation table.
Selling some arms to one side of the strait, even though they may 
only be used for defence, is an attempt of creating trouble or 
fear for the other side. Can you see that? You stupid idiot! 

It is clear after USSR's collapse China becomes the number one
potential threat to US if mainland keeps growing and Taiwan
and Hong Kong join mainland with their economic power. Just like
China played Soviet card with US before, US is trying to play
Chinese (basically Taiwan and Mainland cards as Hong Kong is 
politically too weak) cards now. I won't blame US for doing so as 
any government at such position will do the same: find a scapegoat to 
save her own skin. Chinese are famous for internal fights: is it the 
number one ugly side of Chinese according to Mr. Bei, Yang's book "Ugly
Chinese"? BTW, Chairman Mao was the best in such thing -- how many 
innocent citizens died during Culture Revolution in the hands of other 
citizens? Please note that only very few (or close to none) died 
under the army or government suppression in that period.

If together, we're stronger just as the old idiom says: One
chop stick is easy to bent(break) but ten chop sticks is very hard
to break. Every country has its problems and differences,
like the ILA in Ireland, TI's existence is not a surprise to
anyone in China due to various historical or present reasons.
However, as long as Taiwan is not recognized as an independent
country, let's work together for a Great China and don't fell into
those traps which intend to create conflicts among Chinese.
And leave the TI alone to fulfill their independence dream: time passes
by so fast and things change everyday who knows what will happen
tomorrow.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns)
Subject: Re: Insensitive mainland chauvinist view. (Was: Who Cares 150 F-16s.)
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 22:37:41 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.165717.22137@ms.uky.edu> gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li)  
writes:
> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns) writes:
> 
> >As long as you believe most people are not fool, then let them choose future  
> >for themselves. If the majority of the not-fool-people choose to leave, do  
you  
> 	The logic problem here is the majority of what, should the majority
> 	of the country follow the majority of a province? Let history
> 	decide whether a country should exist, we have the right to select
> 	not sufferring, if we are the majority. As whether people are fool
> 	or not which depends on your standard.
> >see there is a very very serious problem in China. If it were so (I doubt it  
> >seriously), then there would be no need for a country call China exit in the  
> >world.
> 
> >Carl

Now if majority of people in Taiwan select not suffering, are you going to stop  
them. Do you agree that we are now suffering. Do you like more people join us  
and suffer together? Is this your point?

Carl
Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:25542 soc.culture.taiwan:13360
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
From: liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Subject: Re: Specification of F-16, SU-27 (I)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Date: 14 Sep 92 21:26:45 GMT

In article <BuL696.MHq@acsu.buffalo.edu> v999rke8@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu writes:
>In article <1992Sep14.152206.4559@linus.mitre.org>, 129.83.161.10 (H. Chao) writes...
>> 
>>2) I just heard about Q-7 a ground-attack aircraft based on J-7.  Do you
>>have any info about that?
>
>
>I didn't heard anything about that Q-7. But if it is really built based on 
>J-7 (Mig 21), it is a hopeless plane.  You can know this from the style of 
>Mig-21 which has a very large length/wing-width ratio (almost 2) which means 
>poor ability of turning. For an attacker, this is a fatal problem.
>
>In fact, J-6 is better than J-7 in dogfight, especially in low and middle 
>altitude.


yeah, even it's a hopeless plane, some 3rd world country will buy
it 'cause it's just a hell lot cheaper than others, easier to maintain,
and will make nice posters for national day parades, and scare people
around, sure it cannot fight well, but who cares?  ;->
From: hiebeler@think.com (Dave Hiebeler)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: cookbook
Date: 9 Sep 92 08:37:08
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation
Distribution: soc
NNTP-Posting-Host: custard.think.com


  A while ago, someone asked about English-language versions of
Chinese cookbooks.  (The article expired here, so I don't know who
posted it).  I hope that person could post a summary of the responses
they got, since I (and maybe other people) would also like to find a
good cookbook like that.  There are so many Chinese cookbooks in the
bookstore, it would take me all day to look through them and try to
guess which one is best.

--
Dave Hiebeler                  | hiebeler@think.com
Thinking Machines Corporation  | (617) 234-4070
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,talk.politics.china
From: caar17@ccsun.strath.ac.uk ( L.An)
Subject: Test
Organization: University of Strathclyde
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 23:13:09 GMT

Hellow world
 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong