HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kudra@hubcap.clemson.edu (sallie j kudra)
Subject: Re: DOOL:TAN: was Re: DOOL: Kimberly
Organization: Clemson University
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 15:17:38 GMT

mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:

>In article <1992Jul30.202453.17380@hubcap.clemson.edu> kudra@hubcap.clemson.edu (sallie j kudra) writes:
>>mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:
>>>Just trying to help you out wherever I can there bro.  :)   These wenches
>>                                                                   ^^^^^^^
>>Uh oh, Tim, terrible choice of nouns here!  The Websters in front of my face
>>says you better come up with another noun muy pronto.  Even the most innocuous


>Hey Vince, do you recall me using the words "easily distracted"???  Ok, we've
>got one w/ her head buried in the dictionary....  30 to go.  :)


>>definition is insulting (1. a young woman or girl, esp. a PEASANT girl).  For
>>shame Tim, severe head-noogies for you!  I'm not aristocratic, but not a pea-

>Ouch!  Not head noogies!


>>sant either.  The second definition is a servant woman and the third is a
>>wanton woman: prostitute.  Hmmmm... Maybe you are likening the DOOL net 
>>females with Kim - a former wench.  Yeah, yeah, that's the ticket.  Still

>If only I were so lucky.  :)


>>Gee, that all sounds so self-righteous.  I'll chalk it up to a stubborn 
>>program that's giving me fits at the moment.  Still don't like that word
>>though.  My ex-partner-in-crime would have read it and thought "Uh oh, Tim,
>> severe case of head-noogies on the way.  Glad it's not me, cause Sallie
>>gives BAD severe head-noogies."


>Is there anything else that you would consider noogying? 

Hmmm...... depends on what you consider me considering noogie-ing, eh ;8->
Obviously my head is not buried in a dictionary now, not with the made-up
words and atrocious sentence construction.  But hey, I'm a programmer not
an English teacher.

Sallie "I want to be Sister Peel Nectarine!" Kudra


>-- 
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
>|  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
>|  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |


* BITNET:   KUDRA@CLEMSON.CLEMSON.EDU | All opinions are my own:              * 
* INTERNET: KUDRA@ITC.CLEMSON.EDU     |            I'm too old to change now! *
* Sallie Kudra, Information Systems Development, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC   *
From: mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Kimberly
Date: 28 Jul 92 17:55:33 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <Bs29Ip.310@news.udel.edu> riddle@brahms.udel.edu (Tammy Riddle) writes:
>In article <1992Jul27.174717.13273@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:
>>
>>What if I don't?  Ha!  Relish anyone?
>
>Hey, now hold it right there, Tim.  First, you say my child looks like
>Crystal Chappel, which she doesn't, and now you're picking on our Sweet

does   does   does   does   does   does  


>Pickle Peel.  I was told this weekend to let you know you are in "deep
>do-do" from the Peel Sister's, but this just put you in SERIOUS "deep
>do-do!!!!"  


Wow, should I get the hip boots out yet?


>You better watch out, not only is the Mad Poet and the Sweet
>Pickle probably going to have something to say, 


I'm counting on it.  Hey, MP has been pretty quiet.  Maybe he went
and had a core-onary or something.  Hahahahahahha.


>but the other Peels are
>after you!!!  No, Tim, not to be in your net.harem where out to get you!!!


Yeah yeah.  Anything else or are you done babbling?  :-)


>--Peach

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
|  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
|  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Tuesday, 28 Jul 1992 10:29:02 MST
From: <IDDXA@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject:    ATWT: Unlurking for a bit

Boy, am I glad my newsfeed is working today, otherwise I would have missed
Lurker's Day!

My name is Debbie Abston and I have been watching the show for as long as I
can remember. I must have been 5 or 6 when it all began, watching with my
Mom. Neither of us would miss the show for anything. I can remember when
all of those self-righteous Hugheses were not so nice, I cannot stand any
of them (well, Frantic has shown a few brains lately, but only a few!).

I am originally from Detroit, Michigan and moved to Tempe, Arizona 2+ years
ago. I am a librarian at Arizona State U and I love my job. I have been
lurking for over a year now and it really makes my day to read all of the
posts. I like reading other's opinions of the characters and plots, it
makes watching more enjoyable.

I had been planning to unlurk sometime during the fall, I have been fairly
busy helping to plan a conference for October, going to conferences, going
to meetings.... Now that I know how easy this is, I will try to post more
often.

Unfortunately, I will be away from the office for two weeks starting July
30. I will be spending 6 days in Utah, come back to Arizona for one day,
then leave for Michigan for a week to attend my little brother's wedding
and catch up with some old friends.

See you all about August 12!

Debbie
(I hope this works!)
From: jayers@hamline.edu (Judi Ayers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: Y&R - this week
Date: 21 Jul 92 12:48:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: uc.1992Jul21.124821.2286
Organization: Hamline University, St. Paul, MN.

In article <1992Jul20.175644.6627@dmntor.UUCP> toni@dmntor.UUCP (Toni Spurgeon) writes:
>
>
>A few comments... I agree with Mike about how stupid this
>throwing Dru and Neil together is. For MONTHS now, Dru's
>been throwing herself at him and he's been running away.
>Now all of a sudden we're supposed to believe he went
>out and bought a ring and is so in love with her that 
>he proposes? UGH! I just don't buy it!
>
>Toni

Also, I feel the same way about Hillary and Michael being thrown
together.  All of a sudden one day, Michael gives Hillary a ring.
I realize I only get to see Y&R 2-3 times per week, but it still 
seemed a little odd.  They seem to portray Hillary as some week
character around Michael and at first she was supposed to be this
strong independent woman.  The whole scenario just doesn't sit
well with me.  I hate to see them together.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: GAINES@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu (Richard Gaines Jr.)
Subject: Re: ATWT the children are revolting - inmore ways than one..
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 14:30:41 GMT


In article <1992Jul31.075103.321@hemlock.cray.com>, n2413@cray.com (Jo Theis) writes:

In article <1992Jul31.054641.13725@qiclab.scn.rain.com> sallyb@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Sally Bowley) writes:
>HELLO CHAPS AND CHAPETTES!
>
>some musings.......
>
>joeless joe - regarding rowdy (sounds like  agood name for a movie...)
>someone throw some lime jello over this gal, for gawd's sake!!! get a
>grip jlj - oh, sorry, you have. does it hurt, rowdy??? i think you
>need some of nursie's special tes, jlj - and heavy on the bromide ;-)
>

>Hey, hey, HEY!!  Don't be gettin' me drugged up now, just when
>Rowdy and I are having so much fun!  We ARE having fun, aren't we,
>Rowdy?  Rowdy?  Oh damn, he's passed out again...

HUH!!?!!?!?!?!?!?!!?

Rowdy


Corn Flake
- JlJ

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Jo Theis				Illegitimus non
    n2413@cray.com			carborundum est
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: sdm@cs.brown.edu (Scott Meyers)
Subject: GH: Notable Lines & Started Watching...
Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 01:15:31 GMT

If we're quoting notable lines, then Faison (yes, here I go again!) should
not be overlooked.  One of my favorites is the Faisman's reply to Robert's
interrogation:

          ROBERT: My brother noticed a lapel burn on your jacket at the
Outback.

          FAISON: Your brother, he's so smart, he almost scares me!

Delivered in inimitable Faison fashion!  (Take that, Spamhead!) 8-)


BTW, I started watching GH back during the Luke/Laura storyline.  But it
wasn't until Faison that I started watching again full-time.


Hoping the teens run out of fish REALLY soon now...

Nancy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you say to a convicted felon in Providence?  "Hello, Mr. Mayor."
From: steveh@grafex.cupertino.ca.us (Steve Harding KA6ETB)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: other roles
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 23:54:00 PDT
Distribution: usa
Organization: The GRAFex Company

faa@athena.cs.wayne.edu (Felicitas A. Atabong) writes:

> >Sierra as the guest villain on "Law and Order" last Friday.
> 
> I'm so disappointed about missing this. I really loved Sierra.

Last time I saw her on prime time she had gone blonde.  Looked like hell.

steve
From: steveh@grafex.cupertino.ca.us (Steve Harding KA6ETB)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: Lurkers night out
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 17:31:33 PDT
Distribution: usa
Organization: The GRAFex Company

CREECH@LSTC2VM.stortek.com (Teresa Creech) writes:

> I am moving offices on Tuesday July 28, so I don't know if I will have
> net access or not.  Is it ok to come out of the closet (or into it?)
> a little early?

You little-green-apples betcha!

> I enjoy eavesdropping on all of you, especially since I don't get to watch
> Whirley-World very often.  I watched with my mother when I was a little
> girl and as often as I could in college, but now I don't even bother to
> tape it - my for kids demand all my attention when I get home!!!
>  
> I have to speak up in Lisa's defense - I like her, but then again she's been
> around as long as I can remember.  I am used to her.
>  
> By the way, I already have a nick name.  They call me "Mother Teresa", becaus
> there's very few people with FOUR children around here.  It's NOT because of
> my saintly qualities :-)

I'll accept that.
  
> Back to Lurking...

No WAY!  You are now trapped in the twilight zone.

steve
From: cabeca@sw.stratus.com (Linda Cabeca)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Update for Tuesday July 21, 1992
Date: 24 Jul 92 13:43:55 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.

In article <1992Jul23.212703.7933@chpc.utexas.edu>, peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo) writes:
> In article <5093@transfer.stratus.com> cabeca@sw.stratus.com (Linda Cabeca) writes:
> >
> [Lots of stuff deleted]
> >
> >	Izzy and John have some stupid scenes where John is jealous about
> >all the attention the Italian men give his wife.  He makes her kiss him
> >infront of all of the waiters (Gotta love a secure man !!).  They then
> >talk about her childhood.
> 
> Mango's back in all her glory, I see!  :-)  A totally unbiased update
> as always!  :-)  I like it..."Izzy and John have some stupid scenes"...
> very nice.  Very, very nice.  :-)  'Suppose TPTB have any concept?  I 
> don't think they do, either.  Did I say "very nice" yet?  :-)
> 
> >Linda M. Cabeca			cabeca@chablis.sw.stratus.com
> 


	Ah sis Lemon, it is a good thing I was not drinking anything when I
read this because it would be all over my desk right now !!  I still
haven't stopped giggling.  I guess these John and Izzy scenes are really
getting to me !!

Mango !



> Joanna.

-- 
*****************************************************************
Linda M. Cabeca			cabeca@chablis.sw.stratus.com
Stratus Computer Inc.		Linda_Cabeca@vos.stratus.com
*****************************************************************
From: debbiek@rruxc.uucp (25670s-kennedy)
Subject: Re: AMC: Update Wed. July 22
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 92 18:38:51 GMT

In article <1992Jul31.151839.28029@pixel.kodak.com>, fbrown@ssd.kodak.com (Frank Brown) writes:
> Adam was like midas. Do you remember why Palmer broke him?
> 
> Frank
O.K., refresh my memory.  I remember How he broke him but
all I can remember about why is because he put Dixie in
the nut house (Adam was not too far off the mark:-), and
then was trying to get Brooke back.  I know there's more....
                                *********************
Deb                             Since I gave up hope,
                                I feel much better.
                                *********************
From: debraa@poof.WV.TEK.COM (Debra Aubrey;685-3679;63-356;;poof)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: just a thought
Date: 29 Jul 92 23:42:00 GMT
Reply-To: debraa@poof.WV.TEK.COM
Organization: Tektronix, Inc.,  Wilsonville, OR


In article <1992Jul29.133627.1175@engage.pko.dec.com>,
bender@riscee.pko.dec.com (Patricia Bender) writes:
|> 
|> A thought crossed my mind while I was watching the show yesterday

Patricia:

... and it was a really great thought!  Good job.  We should send this one off
to GL ...

	Debbie.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: ginger@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (eleanor.j.gallagher)
Subject: Re: Y&R Pinkslips!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 02:33:35 GMT

In article <16833A836.M21760@mwvm.mitre.org>, M21760@mwvm.mitre.org writes:
> In article <3310053@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>
> robertsl@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Laurie Roberts) writes:
>  
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I picked up a bit of gossip on Y&R:
> >
> >3 cast members will be getting their pink slips in September, including an
> >established family member.  Any guesses?
>  
        O.K.  -  My guesses are Olivia, Flo and Tracy.  Gina
                 comes in a close fourth!!!!!      

                 Speaking of Gina, hasn't she gained an awful
                 lot of weight over the past two years?  I
                 can recall seeing her on a quiz show with her
                 first husband (it eventually came out that he
                 physically abused her), and he said his nickname
                 for her was "Porky."  She was a little overweight
                 at the time, but lost quite a bit of it.

     
                 Eleanor Gallagher
                 ginger@cbnewsg.cb.att.com

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jmf@egret5.stanford.edu (Joseph M. Fierro)
Subject: Re: B&B: Ver. database gives efficient update, Thurs. 7/23
Organization: DSO, Stanford University
Date: 24 Jul 92 09:22:34 GMT

MZ6@psuvm.psu.edu writes:

>Okay, the analogy isn't that good...but I feel for all you folks (like
>me) who were waiting for the return of witty, urbane updates from
>Jimmy--only to be held off a little longer.  [Jim, feelin' guilty yet?
>I knew you would!  :-) :-) :-) ].

>Mike at Penn State

  I for one would like to thank Mike for doing great daily updates.  I
stopped taping B&B last week (couldn't take another man coming on to 
Sally, GROOSSS!!!), but thanks to Mike's updates, I don't feel like I've
missed an episode.  He not only accurately describes what happened, but
he captures the spirit of the show, campy.  He includes just enough 
details to make reading the updates fun and interesting.  They're almost
as good as his Y&R history lessons.  
  Once again, thank you for doing such a good job, it has made my B&B
withdrawal symptoms minimal.
                                      -Joseph M. Fierro

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: n2413@cray.com (Jo Theis)
Subject: Re: ATWT-Test
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 24 Jul 92 14:25:47 CDT

In article <1992Jul24.172703.29820@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> GAINES@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu (Richard Gaines Jr.) writes:
>Just a quick test to see if I can be heard!!  If not I'll try again cause I have
>to be ready for Lurker's day in Oakdale!
>

I hear ya!

- JlJ
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Jo Theis				Illegitimus non           
    n2413@cray.com			carborundum est     
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: sallyg@oregon.uoregon.edu (George, Sally)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC:a few thoughts...
Date: 24 Jul 92 16:29:00 GMT
Organization: University of Oregon

In article <5c3DoB1w161w@cdthq.UUCP> mitch@cdthq.UUCP (Mitch Harris) writes:

>I still don't like Choppers, & here's why: it's like when Steer-a 1st
>cam to PV, & all we heard was how beautiful (NOT!) she was. It's the
>same kinda thing with Choppers, for me. He does *not* look good enough
>to be a male model.And he looks too old for the part. (Not that this is
>his fault - it was bad casting). He is relaxed in front of the camera,
>& he has some charm, if you can look past the he's-supposed-to-be-
>gorgeous-but-he's-not-ness . . . 

I kinda like Choppers . . . maybe because, to be realistic, not everyone 
looks and acts as great as Tad.  So what if he has big teeth, we "could" 
look at that as if it adds character . . . oh, well, I have always been for 
the underdog . . . some people call me too soft-hearted!

Sal

>**********************************************************************

>       ........Beverly H.

>*********************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Misc. Stuff (was: Jack vs. Carly)
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 92 17:57:44 GMT

In article <5224@lhdsy1.lahabra.chevron.com> njs@ghost.lahabra.chevron.com (n.j.spera) writes:
>In article <1992Jul20.203255.24481@chpc.utexas.edu>, peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo) writes:
>|> 
>|> I guess I'll also take this opportunity to note a couple of things I
>|> noticed last time they ran the full credits...Tuesday or Wednesday of
>|> last week.  First (and certainly most horrifying) Palumbo was listed
>|> as co-head-writer (above Sheri's name).  Second, there was no listing
>|> for Lexie.  What does that mean?  Sigh...
>|> 
>|> 
>|> Joanna...Lemon...JoJo...the list goes on.
>|> 
>
>   Sis Lemon - let me remind you - it takes forever for it to change 
>   Remember how long it took Sheri to show up - and knowing the Days
>   schedule - they're getting close to being 3 weeks or more ahead now  -
>   so the stuff we're seeing now was probably written in June - 

So...what are you saying?  He was only back for 3 or 4 weeks?  'Cause
that was the first day he'd gotten a writing credit...it was the same
day Kim reappeared.  And now that I make that connection (!) the 
"lameness" of her return is all explained.  Sigh...I feel better now.

>Tangy Nanc (who can't wait for her vacation next week)

Well, gee...I sure hope you have a great vacation.  I can't wait for
your return just in time for that BIG day.  :-)

Lemonly Joanna.

| \____ ----- ____/           | "Lately, my life is just blighted by |
|      ( o o )                | one ugly little predicament after    |
|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    | another." - Auntie Viv  :-)          |
|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! |       peea224@hermes.chpc.utexas.edu |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: slaury@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (Susan Laury)
Subject: Re: AMC: Trivia Set #14
Organization: Indiana University
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 18:45:50 GMT

In article <1992Jul17.192932.29896@athena.mit.edu> zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria) writes:
>			AMC Trivia Set #14 (I'm bored).
>

I knew at least one this time, so I figured I'd give it a shot.


>1.  Who did Greg Nelson call out for the first night he and
>    Sheila slept together?
>

Ummm, Jenny?

>2.  Who cured Nina when she mentally reverted to her childhood?

Probably Cliff, but I don't remember this happening. Maybe Monique?

>
>3.  Who was Bobby Warner's biological mother?
HEY! I know this one -- it was Sybil Thorne!


>
>4.  When Andrew Cortlandt loosened the saddle on the horse, who was
>    his intended victim?  Bonus: Who did he kill instead?

Got me ... I remember when he was around, but none of the details.

>
>5.  Where did Estelle and Donna work as prostitutes?

Center City -- which reminds me of a question I've had. Sometimes 
people refer to a place that sounds like "sea" city. Is it really 
this or is it "c" city, where the "c" stands for center?



Sus.
slaury@copper.ucs.indiana.edu

>
>           _____     /|_______   
>          / __  \   / ||___  |  Help, I'm in a Well and
>         / /  )_/  /  |   / /   I can't get out!!!!!!
>        / /    __ / | |  / /    Baby, save up all your tears,
>        \ \___/ // /| | / /___  you might need them someday....
>         \_____// ___ ||______|
>               /_/  | |___
>                    |____/ zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: connie@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (CK)
Subject: Re: Y&R: Lyin' Ryan spoiler
Organization: BTL
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 17:46:24 GMT

In article <92203.210203MZ6@psuvm.psu.edu>, <MZ6@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> Don't look ahead if you don't want to know the short-term resolution
> of the Ryan-Victoria-Nina triangle.  You have been warned
> .
> .
> .
Mike, I guesss it's a good move on B. Bell's part
because he isn't going to make us wait a century for
an outcome. 


Oh, I'd LOVE to see the other woman's face when she finds
out about the Chicago get away. 

Thanks for the info.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: heidi@access.digex.com (Heidi)
Subject: Re: B&B - this week
Organization: Express Access Online Communications Service, Greenbelt, Maryland USA
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 05:33:30 GMT

In article <1992Jul21.172328.21530@cs.wayne.edu> faa@artemis.cs.wayne.edu (Felicitas A. Atabong) writes:
>
>[Ridge and Caroline] had the perfect marriage,
>during which Brooke fell in love with Eric(I don't think she stole him
>from Steph. They weren't that happy together anyway).

You're correct, Brooke didn't really steal Eric away from Stephanie,
although that's the way Stephanie chooses to see it. Eric was never
fulfilled with Stephanie and kept getting more and more fed up with
her bitchy, manipulative ways, especially where Brooke and her family
were concerned. (Eric and Brooke were very close friends and he was
very supportive of her relationship with Ridge, much to Steph's
chagrin, and I recall Eric being disapponted when Ridge chose
Caroline.) The last straw for Eric was when he learned that it was
Stephanie who was the force behind moving Brooke's parents (when he
was rekindling his love with Brooke's mom) to Paris. He found this out
around the same time when Brooke was discarded for Caroline and they
were leaning on each other's shoulders and that's what brought them
close.

>I never thought of Brooke as a tramp. I just hate the fact that she
>wants Ridge so much. Ridge has always chosen women over her. While
>Caroline was married to Thorne, I believe he was using her. She worked
>very hard to be accepted by the Forresters. I feel bad about the way
>she's treating Eric, but I do believe we can thank the way she's gotten
>treated by Stephanie and Ridge for that.

Bravo! I think you and I are the only ones who have any sympathy for
Brooke. 

For some of the oldtimers out there, does anyone else think that Storm
(Brooke's older brother) is Eric's son? (Background for newbies: Eric
and Brooke's mom [can't think of her name] were in love in college,
but he ended up getting Stephanie pregnant with Ridge and he chose to
marry her instead.) Storm and Ridge are about the same age... And what
about the possibility that Ridge *isn't* Eric's son? Just a ploy by
the young Steph to get the man she really wanted?

Heidi
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps