From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: NLNS ELECTION COVERAGE (1)
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 00:42:36 GMT

In article <9210140131.AA10654@igc.apc.org> nlns@igc.apc.org (New Liberation News Service) writes:
>/* Written  6:25 pm  Oct 13, 1992 by nlns in cdp:nlns.news */
>/* ---------- "NLNS Packet 3.3 *** 10/12/92" ---------- */
>
>How We Rock!  A review of MTV's Rock The Vote campaign.
>Jason Pramas, NLNS
>
>presidential race) which might include things about George 
>Bush like his favorite sport and rather conspicuously omit less 
>savory facts like: "Biggest Mass Murderer Since Ronald Reagan."

	very cute. very clever. Also a completely unsupported accusation that 
both Reagan and Bush are some kind maniacal evil murderers. You'll probably 
say something about how their policies have led to the death of such-and-
such people, etc. (like those poor, innocent, gun-toting Iraqi soldiers)
Well, It's bullshit.

>get it. I am sick of youth movements in this country that jump 
>to burning police cars without doing any of that funky "middle 
>part"-- 

	What you you don't realize( or won't admit) is that
that the objective of 'revolutionary' movements is using violence and force
to take power, not using democracy. Of course there is usually a sizable
mindless contingent that doesn't really know what it's objective is.
(you might belong to that one)

>	One way we can change all this is precisely by building a 
>new socialist, democratic and feminist third party over the next 

	Ahhh! Socialism! Hasn't it been proven to your satisfaction that
socialism JUST DOESN'T WORK! IT'S A FAILURE!  democracy is a nice word,
you will notice that almost every party uses it or some variant, even
the former USSR claimed to be composed of republics. Any party which has as
one of it's main points, feminism, probably does not have a balanced 
viewpoint with regard to this subject.

>	One way to build revolutionary organizations and parties 
>is to engage in voter registration. 

	Again, my comments on 'revolutionary' parties hold. I might add that,
depending on what you mean by this, this could be considered treason.

>people to register. And it encourages them basically to vote for 
>Clinton/Gore. The second statement will no doubt surprise 

This doesn't surprise me. Mtv's liberal bias is fairly obvious.

>many of you. Why should we support the anti-communist 
>Dixiecrat fucks?  

	anti-communist! oh no! No respectable politician
( is that an oxymoron?) would admit to not being anti-communist. Why? 
because most people realize that being anything but anti-communist shows
that you are an absolute moron. Communism has been shown to be a complete
failure. Will people now shut up about it.

>fully realized) third party has backed the Left up against the 
>familiar old wall of political irrelevance. 

You got that right.
 
>not doomed to an unstoppable slide into complete fascism. That 
>the CIA doesn't control our every waking move, but is itself 
>fraught with splits and ineptitude for all its money and power. 

The CIA (for that matter, any government organization) is certainly fraught
with splits and ineptitude. If there was any doubt before, this proves it.
You are definitely not living in the real world. To even consider that 
we are on an 'unstoppable slide into complete fascism' or that the CIA 
controls 'our every waking move' is absolutely ludicrous.