HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lzheng@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (lian zheng)
Subject: Re: Toycott Update 1/4/93
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 00:34:25 GMT

Lian Zheng, Indiana Univ.
From: slshf@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: exchange rate?
Date: 4 Jan 93 21:33:00 MDT
Distribution: na
Organization: Utah State University

In article <C0CwC9.7FG@cs.dal.ca>, wzhuang@cs.dal.ca (Wendy Huang) writes:
> Could anybody in the net tell me the current exchange rate between
> Canadian Dollar (or US Dollar) and RMB Yuan in Shanghai black market?
> And also Japenese Yuan and US Dollar?
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> W.H.
> 
> 
the exchange rate between Hong Kong $ & RMB now is 100 (rmb) : 105 (hk $)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: carl_@nwu.edu 
Subject: Are you sure ?
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 22:36:30 GMT

In article <93008.155203LXH108@psuvm.psu.edu> <LXH108@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> I took part in 89 movement and on the side of d-people. Next time this
> kind of things happen, I will suggest government not using guns, using
> bombs instead.

Are you sure? What if your younger brother (if you have one) or sister take  
part in such a movement like you did 3 years ago, do you still want the  
government to use bombs?

Carl
From: yeh@netix.com (Mr Shannon Yeh)
Subject: Re: CCP is China's hope
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Organization: Netix Communications, Inc.
Date: 5 Jan 93 21:53:23 GMT

It's an interesting topic but i am sure that those bloodcarders and those
so called "democracy fighters" are NOT the hope to CHina!

Regardless you are CCP CHinese or non-CCP CHinese, you should never forget
those bloodcarders' bad behave and those "democracy" "fighter"'s bad behave
they performed in the US.  

shannon
-------


Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: an3879@anon.penet.fi
Subject: war
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: soc.culture.china
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 15:38:59 GMT


The next war will be the U.N. versus China.
I believe China will lose, but not before killing
tens of millions of its enemies in a nuclear exchange.

After this war, the survivors in China will win the race to rebuild
civilized society.  Whereas the survivors in Europe will begin to
wage tribal and ethnic wars among themselves.  In North America, anarchy 
will reign supreme and a race war breaks out as the different races 
begin to slaughter each other, the race war being triggered by massive
looting by the survivors of the Negroid race.  Another race war ensues
in Australia as the remnants of the white race wages a genocidal campaign
to "clean" their continent of the "Yellows".

India and the Arab countries which manage to stay out of the nuclear
war begin to expand.  The Arab nations begin to expand northward into
Europe as they had in the past.  The Hymmilayan mountains, however, protects
China from and slows down Indian expansion.

In less than 15 years after the nuclear exchange, China manages to rearm
and build more nuclear devices.  It uses them against Australia first as
revenge and to "clean" the continent of "whites".  After this innitial
success in Australia, China's confidence grows and then the Chinese 
embark on the path of world conquest.  Due to the fact that Europe and
North America were still in the state of anarchy, the Chinese quickly
overrun both Europe and the Americas in less then a few months.

Since the Chinese had no quarrals with India and the Arab nations, a 
treaty was signed with them to divide up the world.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: nmrdb@vms.macc.wisc.edu (BEVERLY SEAVEY)
Subject: Need detailed instructions for making rice wine
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date:  4 JAN 93 10:20:32    

  My husband is from Guangzhou and really likes rice wine, which seems
to be fermented stickey rice still in the fermentation broth, so it is
like a loose yeasty soup. We got some packages of yeast from Shanghai,
but the instructions on the back aren't very detailed - they assume
you already know how to make it. The instructions say
1) Add yeast to 4 jin of glutinous rice.
2) keep at 30-32 degrees.


I assume we should soak and steam the rice? Do we drain it completely
before adding the yeast? How long does it take to ferment?
From: math1pu@elroy.uh.edu (Douglas Luo)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: old man cross river
Date: 4 Jan 1993 13:02 CST
Organization: University of Houston
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: elroy.uh.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

In article <1993Jan1.191925.13159@topaz.ucq.edu.au>, huangz@topaz.ucq.edu.au writes...
>In article <31DEC199215440944@elroy.uh.edu>, math1pu@elroy.uh.edu 
>> Here is one for you:
>> 
>> With one single match you walk into a dark room in which you are told there is
>> a candle, a fireplace, a lantern, and the oven.  Which do you light first?
>>
> 
>Answer: The match
> 
>> Can you find anything such that the longer it leaks, the more water it gets?
>>
> 
>Answer: boats, ships (if they are on water), tunnels under water...
> 
>> Which song is the most-recorded ever?
>>
> 
>Answer: Over and over
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

"Stairway to Heaven" by Led Zepplin is the most-recorded single hit of all time.

What is the second most-recorded hit ever now?



SOMETIMES I THINK I LEARN MORE IF I CLOSE ALL MY BOOKS.


Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: guohsu@mercury.cs.uregina.ca (Allen G.C. Hsu)
Subject: Re: Interesting Picture
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 02:58:38 GMT
Organization: University of Regina, SK, Canada

In article <3994@creatures.cs.vt.edu> zhang@csgrad.cs.vt.edu (Yaoen Zhang) writes:
>A quick note about the "Interesting Picture" I posted a while ago.
>
>The method to decode the picture I suggested is not working right.
>I believe you have to use an editor (like, vi) to join them together,
>then use "uudecode" command.
>
>Yaoen 

    An easier way to eXTRACT a series of .gif files: type e at each
 current post, you will be prompted by the system each time you e-ed,
 the .gifs will be appended altogether, after the last one, you will
 be prompted the uudecode is done.      


Guo-Ching Hsu    -- guohsu@cs.uregina.ca 
            ----------------------------------
                     DUM VIVIMUS VIVAMUS
            ----------------------------------
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: rfc@allegra.att.com (Robert F. Casey)
Subject: Individuals as amateur radio operators in China
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 14:56:18 GMT

Heard on an amateur radio news service "Newsline" of Jan 1, that the Chinese
government is allowing individual persons to get licenses to operate
amateur radio.  Amateur radio is a hobby two way communications system,
somewhat similar to Citizen's Band radio, but more orderly, and more range
and frequencies.  Communications around the world on the amateur radio
shortwave bands is possible.  Mostly, "hams" (as amateur radio people are
sometimes called) will see how far they can communicate, and usually
exchange signal quality reports.  And will serve as a communications
channel in emergency conditions (hurricanes, earthquakes, and such).  
Russia has amateur radio, and some of these hams helped in small ways
to defeat the hardliner's attempt to take over the government there
back in Aug '91.  By communicating information as to what was going
on, and such.  Not a big part of that picture, but it helped.
Pretty much any non-commercial 2 way communications is allowed.
There are several different modes of operations, one of which is
a small scale version of the Internet, with it's version of e-mail
and public postings.  (no, there is no real connection between this
and the Internet, as commercial e-mail and postings, i.e. advertisments,
would not be allowed, also dirty words are also not allowed.)
It's called "packet radio".
In the USA, if you're have some sort of permanemt status (green card, maybe
other things), you can then take tests to get an American license.
Tests are not hard, electrical theory and rules, and some levels of
license a Morse code test.  Radio Shack has study guides.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: an3845@anon.penet.fi (Tory)
Subject: Re: About the latest China launched satillite
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: soc.culture.china
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 10:11:56 GMT


wangf@unixg.ubc.ca (Frank Wang)writes:

>Just got a message from China that US side admitted that it was 
>their fault which caused the loss of the satillite.
>
>Rgds.
>
>F. Wang


<CVRLIUS@TECHNION.BITNET> wirtes:

>If it is true, that will be  a good news for china!!

You heartless Chinese!! Just imagine what a bad news this is 
for those poor Americans who designed this Sat! Some of them
may lost their jobs! 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
From: stlin@stevelin.Eng.Sun.COM (Steven Lin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Rumor: U.S. Selling Nuke Sub to Taiwan?
Date: 11 Jan 1993 17:57:30 GMT
Organization: Sun
NNTP-Posting-Host: stevelin

In article <106570@bu.edu> lix@thames.bu.edu (Xiaowen Li) writes:

>>Besides, the ROC mid-range missile is capable to hit the right spot like
>>Shanghai, Hangchow, Xiamen, Guangchow,....
>> Still, ROC needs to sustain
>>a long term blockade or air raid. Therefore, buying possible western
>>weapons is absolutely necessary, not to attack but to defend ROC.
>
>Have you passed my suggestion to Taiwan authority? I suggested that
>mainland and Taiwan to form a joint venture: Mainland invests a flattop,
>100 submarines, TW invests 200 planes, and hire some managers from HK,
>to make a tourist line from NanSa to DiaYuTai. I guess many oversea
>Chinese are willing to pay for such a tour, it will be very benefitial
>business, well, at the least better than bombing each other.
>-- 
Ha, Ha, Lix might think he is a secretary of Dx. But, I have no connection
to your enemy KMT. No wonder so many mainlanders are so mixed up, don't
you know Nansa to Diaoyutai is under KMT control? Are you trying to 
bloodshed those islands without PLA? :-) :-) :-)

Why don't you propose Dx to give Shanghai to KMT. Under KMT Shanghai is
the number one city in Asia. Under CCP, Shanghai ia a garbage collector,
the world number one polluted city, and most of merchants moved out to
get away from the killer party.

If Shanghai is back KMT control, there is no need to talk about 3-tone.
It is damned stupid of CCP. Since the CCP needs help, why don't beg and
beg to the old brother to help? If Shanghai is back to KMT, the KMT has
to pour $$$$$$$$$ in without the CCP begging. It is the highest tactics
to negotiate unification. (Perhaps, after KMT rebuilt Shanghai, using
the red-guard to re-liberate Shanghai.)

Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:34187 talk.politics.china:3601
From: CX67@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA (CX67000)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,talk.politics.china
Subject: RE: Jiang Zeming's Funny Slogan.
Date: 8 Jan 93 15:20:14 GMT
Organization: McGill University

In article <C06K6w.J39@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
>Reading Editorial People's Daily on New Year give me some
>funny feeling. Obviously, the following underlined words
>were from Jiang Zeming sometimes ago. It recalls me that this
>man once asked his son to stay in America and not to return
>China when he was still in Shainghai.
>
>BTW, I am still in favor of the first part of the sentence.
>
>From CND News:
>
>"In 1993, China should give stress to both economic development and
>building of socialist culture and ethics, educate the people, especially
>the youth, in line with the Party's basic line (of) patriotism,
>collectivism and socialism," the People's Daily editorial said.
>
>
>
>
>.
>.
From: zengj@ul.ie
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: old man cross river
Date: 2 Jan 93 13:41:34 GMT
Organization: University of Limerick, Ireland

In article <009657A3.B52FE8A0@Msu.oscs.montana.edu>, uphhswh@Msu.oscs.montana.edu writes:
> an old man in his 70s crossed a river without bridge.  the river is wide and
> deep. he wears a long scarf. there is a tree at the other side of river.
> how come?
> W.Huang

============================

There are many many ways to cross the river for him.

1).  Get a boat.

2).  Walk cross the river if water is already gone.

3).  Collect some wood, use his long scarf to make a boat.

4).  Ask a jet to offer him a lift.


Where there's a will, there's a way.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Subject: Re: Cannibalism in Guangxi during the Cultural Revolution
Keywords: Terrible conclusion
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Distribution: na
Date: 11 Jan 93 16:18:37 GMT

In article <1993Jan9.153814.24462@oracle.us.oracle.com> fyu@fyusparc2.us.oracle.com (Francis H. Yu) writes:
>In article <93Jan8.155931est.56@orasis.vis.toronto.edu> liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu) writes:
>>I think the real problem is that all people went crazy during CR, and
>>everyone shares the blames, not only the ccp politicans, afterall,
>>it's the people who beat each other up absolutely no good reason,
>>you can't blame all the thrid Reich problem on Hilter, the german
>>people went along with it, and a lot of them voluntarily.  Germans
>							    ^^^^^^^
>>was much better educated than chinese, so do the people shooting each other 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>and raping each other's wifes & daughterS in ex-Yugoslavia and in some areasi
>>of ex-USSR, ...
>
>I am Chinese, and I am offended.

sorry, didn't mean to offend.  
but are you saying chinese in general were better educated than Germans
in the 30s or present xUSSR, xYugoslavia citizens?

>-- 
>Francis H. Yu
>Oracle Corporation, 500 Oracle Parkway, Box 659504, Redwood Shores, CA  94065
>Email:  fyu@shanghai.oracle.com  Voice:  (415) 506-3129  FAX:  (415) 506-7103


Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: mlibucha@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Mark A Libucha)
Subject: Re: Did Jesus practice qi gong?
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 04:35:09 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.180340.29659@newsgate.sps.mot.com> dwong@chopsuey.pico writes:
>..deleted... 
>>
>>	You haven't answered the *implied* question. If you are in the group
>>I delineated (believe in qi gong, but don't believe in the miracles), and
>>you say that anyone can master qi gong, then why can't Jesus have had qi gong?
>>
>>Mark
>
>I guess it may be better for you to explain what you meant exactly by "miracles"?
>and also what are you implying?
>
>David W.
>
>

By miracles I mean walking on water (deep ocean water), turning water into
wine, feeding hundreds of people with a few fish and a couple of loaves of
bread, bringing Lazarus (and himself) back from the dead, etc.

And by qi gong, I mean the same types of things: curing people with terminal
diseases, jumping from the ground onto the top of a three story building,
seeing thru walls of concrete two feet thick, etc.

What I'm implying is: if some people believe in the "miracles" of qi gong,
but dismiss the "miracles" of Jesus, there must be some difference between
what Jesus did and what qi gong is, and I'd like to have that difference
explained to me. Sorry if I wasn't clearer originally.

Mark

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: echeng@phys.psu.edu (Eddie Cheng)
Subject: Re: Return your money to the poor Chinese children, Some of your CSS's!!!
Organization: Penn State, Department of Physics
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 17:37:30 GMT

In article <1ikderINNrvj@hsc.usc.edu> xuxianz@hsc.usc.edu (Xuxian Zhang) writes:
>Hi Very Nice   Guy Take Care Chinese. How are you sure the money will not get 
>into CCP's hand. Please make sure the money will serve for the Chinese not CCP.

	Hmm, how were you sure the money was not from CCP's hand when you 
got it in the first place?  How nice it is to think that when one gets
money from Chinese government, it is from "Chinese people" and when
one pays money (back) to Chinese government, it is to "CCP"!


	 Eddie
From: GRS00003@CONRAD.APPSTATE.EDU (GRS9999101)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Airline tickets for sale
Date: 5 Jan 1993 22:39:43 GMT
Organization: APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: conrad.appstate.edu
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

This is for a friend fresh in the states

Return airline tickets...Hickory, NC to Charlotte, NC and Charlotte, NC
to San Francisco on March 4 1993.  Face value on remainder would
be nice, otherwise, best offer.

Contact Kevin or ask for Mr Yan Hui.

Thanks.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: an3845@anon.penet.fi (Tory)
Subject: Re: weapon sales to Taiwan
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: soc.culture.china
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 17:03:21 GMT

mvdvalk@cs.utwente.nl (Martijn van der Valk) writes:

>Imagine the following scenario: the mainland starts a (small) military
>intervention against Taiwan because the TI movement has become too powerful
>or whatever reason they come up with: civil war in the Pacific, Chinese
>butchering Chinese for the better of the Chinese people, no doubt.
>
>Japan, loyal to the Taiwanese as ever, tells the US that they will 
>take care of the poor island and start to ``help'' the Taiwanese forces.
>
>Result: Japan and China are again at war...
>
>Like to hear your opinions on this scenario. Thanks in advance!

Are you going to write a would-be best-seller? Good idea!
Just as there are so many fictions on USSR-US wars, there should be
some on China-Japan wars .... Oh, I must start tonight, and I'll
publish it before you! 

Tory



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: phsj@marlin.jcu.edu.au (Su Jianfeng)
Subject: Re: Everyone should change his major to Qi Gong major
Keywords: Qi Gong
Organization: James Cook University
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 03:25:18 GMT

In article <C0Cr3C.54H@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> yawei@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (~{QG9p~}) writes:
>In article <1993Jan4.061210.23905@marlin.jcu.edu.au> phsj@marlin.jcu.edu.au (Su Jianfeng) writes:
>
>>  There are many people to critize the QiGong master's claim.
>>Unfortunately, they don't know how to repeat the QiGong master's
>>results.   Thus, they can not prove the masters are liers. 
>
>  This is rubbish. If Yan Xin's claims can be repeated, no one
>would be calling him a liar. :-)

In Yan Xin's lectures, there were often some people who show strange
responses (some strange behaviours) to his speech.   Can an ordinary
person show the similar ability by giving a similar speech?  If not, one
can say Yan Xin has some thing special.   What in his speech is not
important.  He may just want to let his audiences to believe his superior 
abilities or believe himself to be a special man.   What important is the 
results of his speech.   Can an ordinary person stimulate some of the persons
attending the lecturer to act strangely by giving a similar speech like he did ?    


J Su

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: cshi@cs.ulowell.edu (Chunde Shi)
Subject: Re: Illiteracy Rate in PRC
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Lowell Computer Science
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 03:51:01 GMT

In article <2B4A52CD.15211@news.service.uci.edu> ygu@balboa.eng.uci.edu (Yifan Gu) writes:
>In article <9301060231.AA02384@thames.bu.edu> lix@crsa.bu.edu (Xiaowen Li) writes:
>So, should we conclude from there that the literacy rate is (100-20.8)%,
>or 79.2% > 75%  ?    Am I making a mistake ?
>
>BTW, anyone out there has statistics on the numerical illiteracy rate of
>chinese ?
A year ago, there was   a meeting by Education Ministers of Pacific rim
natioons, Chinese education minister boasted China has literate rate 84%.
Ordinary Chinese do not read much, even there are literate, HanZi is too damn
hard.
From: stlin@stevelin.Eng.Sun.COM (Steven Lin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Illiteracy Rate in PRC
Date: 6 Jan 1993 18:23:06 GMT
Organization: Sun
NNTP-Posting-Host: stevelin

In article <106246@bu.edu> lix@thames.bu.edu (Xiaowen Li) writes:
>In article <2B4A52CD.15211@news.service.uci.edu> ygu@balboa.eng.uci.edu (Yifan Gu) writes:
><In article <9301060231.AA02384@thames.bu.edu> lix@crsa.bu.edu (Xiaowen Li) writes:
><
><Ah...  ,  229 million illiterates.  The chinese population is 1.1 billion,
><or 1100 million. So the illiteracy rate is 229/1100  = 0.208 x(100%) =20.8%.
><So, should we conclude from there that the literacy rate is (100-20.8)%,
><or 79.2% > 75%  ?    Am I making a mistake ?
>
>Yes, you did. When calculating illiteracy rate, infants and teenagers should
>be excluded. 

Oh! Yeah? The teenages should be excluded?  So, in other words, the figure
above is a make-up. Ha, no wonder there are so many luggage carrier teens
in Huangshan tour area and so many teens along the Yantze River looking for
easy jobs. 

>May I suggest you to donate a few bucks to SOS or HOPE project?

No kidding! No Money, No Funny!  No teens, no future for the hope project
of P'ROC. 

>Let's HOPE our young generation at least know what is literate rate.
>
Yeah! Many I met told me they stayed in school for few years, because
they were too small to work. When they get to the age able to make money
they quit the school (grade 3 and up). They are literated, hunh?
From: ubacr46@dcs.bbk.ac.uk (G. Cheng)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Illiteracy Rate in PRC
Date: 6 Jan 93 22:56:29 GMT
Reply-To: ubacr46@dcs.bbk.ac.uk
Organization: Birkbeck College, Department of Computer Science

In article 106284@bu.edu, lix@thames.bu.edu (Xiaowen Li) writes:
>In article <1993Jan6.192821.532@cs.ucf.edu> jinxiong@cs.ucf.edu (Chen Jinxiong) writes:
>>In article <9301060231.AA02384@thames.bu.edu> lix@crsa.bu.edu (Xiaowen Li) writes:
>>>(my stuff deleted)
>>
>>How about Yi2 zi3 zhi1 mao2 (Use your own sword)
>>Jiang1 zi3 zhi1 deng2 (onto your own shield).
>
>You are certainly welcome!!! If you convinced me that there is something
>MaoDun in my message, I ceratinly will donate to SOS as my "Wang Yang Bu
>Lao" for next generation. How about yourself?
>
>Where is your "Jiang1" from? This proverb has several acceptable
>expressions:
>
>Yi3 (or Jiang1) zi3 zhi1 mao2
                 ^^^
>Gong (or Xian) zi3 zhi1 dun
                ^^^
Sorry, but what's this? Or "ji3"?
                            ^^^
>
>But what do you mean by Yi2 zi3 zhi1 mao2, Jiang1 zi3 zhi1 deng2?
>Kind to explain? This is only a small example how important education
>is. I suggest you to follow other netters, do something helpful.
>
>Thanks in advance.

---
Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:34452 alt.alien.visitors:9818
From: petert@zikzak.apana.org.au (Peter T.)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,alt.alien.visitors
Subject: Re: SOCCER
Date: 13 Jan 1993 01:33:22 GMT
Organization: Zikzak public access UNIX, Melbourne Australia
NNTP-Posting-Host: zikzak.apana.org.au
Newsreader: MS Windows WinVN

In article <C0p3Cr.Lsv@news.udel.edu>, gbc@brahms.udel.edu (Baochun Ge) says:
>
>
>Hellow Guys:
>
>        I know Chinese soccer team beat Poland Olympic and
>Moscow teams 5:1 and 3:1 seperately in Singapore. But who
>won the champain after all, China or South Korea ? Information
>much appreciated.

How did this get in here?
Hmm...maybe someones finger slipped.
Peter T.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china