Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex
Subject: Karen, this is not alt.flame!
From: cvafy006@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu
Date: 6 Jan 93 10:50:57 PST
 <1993Jan5.162517.1@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu> <C0FMxx.7JJ@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Nntp-Posting-User: cvafy006

In article <C0FMxx.7JJ@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, branwen@sage.cc.purdue.edu ( ) writes:
>       Regarding the Jack-In-The Box incident--
> 
>       If the restaurant is Mexican, there is no discrimination in hiring
> only Mexican workers.  This was determined in a case involving a Chinese
> restaurant in Massachusettes.  In order to preserve the atmospheric
> intentions of an ethnic restaurant, it is desirable to employ those who
> possess the ethnic traits that are associated with that ethnic group.
>       The same works for women's apparel stores. It is not discrimination
> to hire only women to work in a women's clothing shop.  So stop your
> white male whiney ass bitching and wake up.  If you are afraid that the
> hiring of only hispanics to work in the local Taco-Paco is taking away
> your right to seek employment, you are insane.  The local Italian restaurant
> here only hires Italians, or people who "look Italian" in an effort to
> maintain an Italian atmosphere.  But because these people are white, I guess 
> nobody will complain.
> 
>       Now, regarding gays--if gays are not permitted to work without fear
> of discrimintation, they will be on welfare.  If they are on welfare, they 
> qualify for YOUR TAX DOLLARS to sustain their lifestyle.  Further, they will
> be exempt from paying taxes, thus giving nothing to the community in return.
> Finally, they will be given the opportunity to get goverment subsidized
> jobs--in other words, Gays will be getting jobs because they are gay!
>       By opposing the anti-discrimination laws, you are contributing to the
> systematic employment of gays using your tax dollars!  Chew on that as you
> sit upon your Ivory tower picking and choosing who God loves and who He doesn't.
> Love the Sinner, Despise the Sin
> Let he who is without blame cast the first stone
> Judge not lest ye be judged
> Do not concern yourself with the mote in your neighbor's eye until
>  you have removed the plank from your own.
> 
> Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and your children, and your
>  spouse, and your best friend.
> 
> Love your neighbor as you love yourself.
> 
> (Quite Biblical--isn't it?!)
> 
>                                             Karen,
>                                             Believer in Christ as the Savior
>                                              and Redemptor
> 
>                                             (and lesbian, not my choice,
>                                              just my life)
> 


	Let me ask you then, why the heck do you have to resort to personal
insults when someone (like myself) hits the nail on the head???  Remeber, I
din't FLAME you...I just stated my views.  Some have agreed with me, some
haven't...But, everyone else who responded seemed to reply maturely...so why do
you digress in age and call my rebuttal "bitchy whining"???  It's my view...and
it is true...it's not just "whining".  Please think about this...this is
alt.politics.sex, not alt.flame!  If you want to flame me, post to alt.flame
and you can have your flame war!  Well, enough of this, I have DC Restistor
Circuit Class to attend now.  Keep it calm and cool and the net!
Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex