HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Olaf_Boos@s2.maus.de (Olaf Boos)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Question about Supra and PC-fa
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 18:11:00 GMT
Organization: MausNet
X-Gateway: MausGate/News 1.13

 HiYa!

jschweik@nyx.cs.du.edu schrieb am 24.09.92 zum Thema "Question about Supra and
PC-fa":

> I have only two simple (I hope so) questions:
>
> -does the SupraFAXmodem V.32bis work together with Bitfax 2.0 for Windows
>  (I live in Germany so i cannot call the Supra BBS)

Supra BBS Germany: 02232 22000 V.32bis

BTW: the latest Info about ROM-Update 1.2g in Germany:

------>
22-09-92

- Sorry to all Supra users that have been waiting for the new ROM's (V1.2g)
  they are still not shipping
<------
(captured a few minutes ago)

But remember, at the end of august they wrote something like "the new update
will reach at the beginning of august." -> no comment :-/

MfG and so long, the Big BLUE.....
--
## SubNet: blue_elephant@fussel.ruessel.sub.org   ## Das Fliegen ist die ##
## Maus  : Olaf Boos @ S2                         ## Kunst  sich auf den ##
## Snail : Kranichstr. 11 / 6700 Ludwigshafen 28  ## Boden  zu   werfen, ##
## Spruch: SMT-HQ Fussel: Alles ruessel oder was? ## aber  daneben!  ;-) ##
## CrossPoint v1.94 ##
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: musical!sam (Sam Przyswa)
Subject: Re: Supra modem power adaptor
Organization: - Rock'n Jazz BBS - (The Music Land)
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 17:33:40 GMT

In article <1992Sep16.203259.8436@cs.wisc.edu> dross@cambizola.cs.wisc.edu  
(Dan Ross) writes:
> My Supra v.32bis modem's power adaptor/transformer gets very hot when it is
> plugged in--too hot to touch for very long, in fact.  I recall seeing  
discussion
> of the modem itself getting warm (mine does this), but I don't recall  
anything
> about the transformer.  I realize transformers also get warm, but this one  
is
> literally so hot I can't touch it after it's been plugged in for several
> hours.
> 
> Anyone else have experience with this?  (I'll check the Supra BBS and
> report back, too.)
> 

	Yes I have the same problem, I have to keep the modem on for my  
automatics polls, and yesterday the DC adaptor (european version 230V) is dead  
! I think 1000 mA it s not enough, I am trying a 1,5 Amp adaptor.

	See you...			Sam
 
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Sam Przyswa                                   << Rockn Jazz BBS >>
  E-Mail: sam@musical.fdn.org       Paris        FidoNet: 2:320/102  
  --<NeXTmail accepted 10Ko max>--  France        Music & Midi BBS
From: gtoal@ibmpcug.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: USR sporster can support HST connections? [USR please note]
Date: 27 Sep 92 21:05:08 GMT
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.

In article <1992Sep24.082733.19620@u.washington.edu> england@milton.u.washington.edu (England) writes:
>oriented purchase!  I'd have NEVER believed it would be possible to upgrade
>from a piece of junk Supra to a USR 16.8 Dual standard for a measly $90!!

And do you think USR will learn the marketing lesson from this fiasco
that the public has always known and companies refuse to believe? - that
it's better to avoid specious 'product differentiation' and sell the best
they can make at the lowest price they can make a profit on... and make
big bucks from selling large numbers rather than a larger margin on
smaller numbers.

G
-- 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: hmikola@polaris.utu.fi (Hannu Tapio Mikola)
Subject: Re: Supra modem power adaptor
Organization: University of Turku, Finland
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 21:23:17 GMT

I've used an early model of Supra V32bis with two different versions of the
excellent Mascot series of AC adaptors (rated between 800-950mA/230V).
Everything has worked fine and the adaptor stays cool even after several hours
of use.
From: pnor@btma74.nohost.nodomain
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Intel SATISfaction 14.4 Fax modem ???'s
Date: 6 Oct 92 15:00:24 GMT
Reply-To: pnor@se.alcbel.be
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: Alcatel Bell



oeschi@netmbx.netmbx.de (Johann Deutinger) writes:

> Intel will be happy to answer all questions - they have a BBS and CIS support

Anyone know an internet address for Intel where one can get sensible answers
to modem FAX/modem type questions? Pricing/availability and also techie
type questions?


--
Regards

Phil Norris - pnor@se.alcbel.be
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: erik@eab.retix.com (Erik Forsberg)
Subject: Re: Hayes Press Release: High-Density Rack Communications System
Organization: Retix, Santa Monica CA
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 06:32:04 GMT

In article <qmdpfss@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com> vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes:
>In article <BvMGyB.Kt5@news.udel.edu>, radel@bach.udel.edu (Todd Radel) writes:
>> In article <6126.2acf0655@hayes.com> tnixon@hayes.com writes:
>> >
>> >                                              FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>> >                                                        H-2492XXXAT
>>                                                                ^^^
>> Gee...looks like a "TIES bomb" to me.  What do you all think?
>
>					     (I changed the +s to Xs.)
>
>
>Good point.  Someone from Hayes should comment immediately.
>
>In the absense of a convincing explanation that the intent of that
>string was not to cause mischief, to kill modems on links not running
>precompressed news, or to crash modems for people remotely reading
>news, their UUCP and mail feeds should make threatening noises.  The
>network posse would be called out for a denial of service attack from
>Joe College.  The same standards should apply to all organizations and
>individuals.  
>

I would assume the following to be the relevant part.

>Of course, the fact that there has not been a great hue and cry about
>that string suggests that Hayes has in fact grossly exaggerated danger
>of "TIES".
>

I personally feel that ANY character combination whatsoever, is perfectly
appropriate in a news item (at least when they are short enough). Any one's
modem that does something unexpected with it obviously has it completely
misconfigured for the task at hand.

I thought it was kind of a cute idea (and seeing how many flames it attracted)

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik Forsberg, erik@eab.retix.com Phone: (310) 476-7133 FAX: (310) 476-7657
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: jpf@wstar.mixcom.com (John P. Flanagan)
Subject: Re: Shunning proprietary modems (was: Re: Zoom vs Supra vs ZyXEL)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 17:12:52 GMT
Organization: WaveStar Technology

kevinb@oblivion.csd.sgi.com (Kevin Brokaw) writes:

>I know of at least 3 other manufacturers that are simply sitting on 
>their hands, waiting for Rockwell to resolve the problem. 1.20H 
>claims to address this at least in some respects... I'll reserve
>further decisions about Supra until I see how it fares (I believe
>1.20H is the first ROM revision after they announced their 
>departure from dependance upon Rockwell for base ROM changes).
>                                                                      

Fair enough, but do you remember Supra's early advertisements?
14,400 bps DATA?  Are We Connecting Yet?

I'm still waiting (month's later) for Supra to make good on that promise.
The latest rom upgrade will arrive ~3 weeks from now; if the Supra still
can't connect at 14.4k (or 12k), what would you do?  ;-)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger)
Subject: Re: Supras in BBS type operation
Summary: On the other hand....
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 16:25:08 GMT
Organization: Macro Computer Solutions, Inc., Chicago, IL

In article <90522@netnews.upenn.edu> botelle@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Justin Botelle) writes:
>In article <1992Sep11.013715.23858@engr.uark.edu) hbj@engr.uark.edu (Bernard Johnson) writes:
>)robert@cc.utah.edu (Robert Roll) writes:
>)
>))	Has anyone out there had any experience with Supras on a BBS or
>))a large dial in operation. We are considering installing around 25 to 30 of
>))them for our University Campus dial in service. They seem to be fairly
>))resonably priced and we have done a trial run with 6 of them on the front
>))end of our dial in rotary. One of the bugs we experienced may have been
>))addressed with the new roms Supra just recently announced. This was the
>))bug with them locking up. The CD state would just display continuously
>))on the led display and they would then not answer the phone. The only
>))way to clear this was to power cycle the modem. Another problem we 
>))encountered was with them displaying garbage after some number of connections
>))	
>)
>)I wouldn't buy another until they could show positively that they have a fix
>)for the problem.  I've had my modem since March and been promised a fix since
>)about a week later when I discovered the problem.  I've already installed the
>)first ROM upgrade that was *supposed* to fix the problem.  It didn't, so I have
>)to reset my modem several timers per week (sometimes several times per day).
>)IMHO, if you have to depend on it (dial in lines), don't buy from Supra until
>)AFTER the fix is verified!
>
>I have two Supra 14,400s.  Just purchased them.  Haven't had any problems.
>Have used host mode OK, as well.  Fax works too (not a big priority, tho)

I have two Supra 14.4s as well.

Once in a GREAT while they will do this.  I have had, over the course of
three months, about one instance on each unit.  It is damn annoying when it
does happen; a power cycle is necessary to fix it when it occurs.  DTR
twiddling and the like is of no help.

However, by and large I have been extremely happy with the modems.  Their
new ROMs are supposed to fix this -- if they do, and fix the other minor
problems I have had with the modems, I could give a nearly unconditional
recommendation.  

I will, of course, post my experience with the new ROMs here once they
arrive.

Then again, I run "positive control" UUGETTY replacement software on my Unix
machine which handles the modems, and it seems better able to cope with
strange modems than the stock stuff.

For under $300 they're still, IMHO, a great deal.

--
Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
Data Line: [+1 312 248-0900] Anon. arch. (nuucp) 00:00-06:00 C[SD]T
Request file: /u/public/sources/DIRECTORY/README for instructions
From: ciaran@aldhfn.akron.oh.us (Skip Watson)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 11:17:28 -0400
Organization: Auldhaefen Associates
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Distribution: world
Reply-To: ciaran@aldhfn.akron.oh.us (Skip Watson)
Subject: Re: Supra New ROM
X-Newsreader: Ann 0.9

In article <oele1ny00iUy87T2Vm@andrew.cmu.edu>,
	Kwan-Ju Chen <kc2x+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
-> 
-> Hi!  Any of you have received the new rom from Supra yet?  I ordered the
-> rom through Supra's BBS last Wednesday.  So.. any of you got it yet?

	I ordered it Tuesday night through the bbs. The way I figure oit
(from their own information) it should be here today.

Skip Watson
-- 
Internet: ciaran@aldhfn.akron.oh.us    UUCP: ciaran@aldhfn.UUCP
Auldhaefen / World's End BBSes         216 753-8791  (v.32bis)
Auldhaefen Associates                  Email: auldhaefen@aldhfn.akron.oh.us
From: hmikola@polaris.utu.fi (Hannu Tapio Mikola)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Supra
Date: 30 Sep 92 21:41:48 GMT
Organization: University of Turku, Finland

I have an old version (S/N under 8000) of Supra and have had no problems
at all. Connections from Finland to SupraBBS are just OK with 14.4kbs.
I also make connections to a local BBS with Supra V32bis regularly without
any problems. You should remember that the very early models had bugs in their
ROMs and just now Supra is offering a free ROM uppgrade to all customers.

Hannu Mikola
From: jong@wright.seas.ucla.edu (Jong Y. Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Can't go above 1400CPS
Date: 29 Sep 92 04:25:46 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: SEASnet, University of California, Los Angeles

In article <1a4p8rINNam4@aludra.usc.edu> dliao@aludra.usc.edu (David Liao) writes:
>I just bought Zyxel 1496E and a 10 foot serial cable from Egghead.
>When I do transfer with local BBSs, my modem receives CRC or ZHEADER errors
>if the rate goes above 1400CPS.  I used the same modem from my friend during
>the summer and I had no problem at all.  I also replaced my IDE card.
>
>So, which is the source of the problem?
>
>1) Zyxel 1496E
>2) 10 foot serial cable
>3) cheap serial chip in IDE

Try with disk caching program and/or TSR programs disabled.  I had a similar
problem with my SupraFaxModem before.  I turned off the disk caching program,
and then it worked fine.  I guess when the caching program tries to write
to the disk it monopolizes the interrupt too long, thus resulting
BAD CRC.  The error is not coming from the phone line, but from between 
the modem and  the computer. 
Anyway, now it happily transfers files at 1600cps WITH caching program on
after I upgraded to 16550AFN UART.  If you are serious about high speed
file transfers, you should consider 16550.


Jongyoon
From: burress@twics.co.jp (Tim Burress)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ISDN->TA->Modem->Router->Ethernet:  A Better Way?
Date: 3 Oct 92 23:51:48 GMT
Organization: TWICS, Tokyo, Japan

        We run a dialup communications service in Tokyo, and will soon be
converting our lines to ISDN.  Unfortunately most of our members do not have
ISDN, so they won't be able to connect to our system directly.  So the 
conceptual plan is to have one 23B+D line come in, then run the B channels
through terminal adapters, run the analog signal through modems, then take
the serial output to a router where the sessions would be fed onto our Ethernet
as telnet sessions.

        Seems a bit round-about.

        So what I'm wondering is first, does anyone make an ISDN compatible
"virtual modem" which would decode the digital signals according to modem
protocols, connect with the caller's modem, and generate the appropriate serial
data stream?
        Second, does anyone make a product that goes one step further, and
which would make the proper transformations to go directly between the B
channel and a telnet session on an Ethernet?  In other words, combine, say, 16
terminal adapters, 16 Telebit T3000's, and a NetBlazer, all in one box, and
without the intermediate steps. 

        Thanks in advance for any information!


Tim Burress                                     Internet:  burress@twics.co.jp
TWICS Co., Ltd.
1-21 Yotsuya, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160 Japan
From: Petty@ralvm29.VNET.IBM.COM (Jack Petty)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 92 14:00:39 EDT
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Trellis correction
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0
            <wek.718375934@thx>

In <wek.718375934@thx> Bill Keasler(x4051 writes:
>
>Lee-Fang Wei of AT&T Bell Laboratories, is, in my humble opinion,
>the inventor of the code actually used in V.32.
>
Gottfried agrees.  My apologies to Mr. Wei.
Also, Gottfried commented that his objection at the time had to do with
differential encoding which he says produces a small increase in the bit
error rate.  I believe he wanted to avoid that slight degradation.
Jack Petty
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: cloos@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (James H. Cloos Jr.)
Subject: Which (high speed) modem
Organization: Cornell Information Technologies, Ithaca, NY 14853
Distribution: comp
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 07:19:27 GMT

Hello all.

I need a V.32bis + V.42 + V.42bis + V.17 modem with full fallback
capability.  Voicemail and CallerID are not necessary, but are
acceptable options.

If money were no object, which one would you get, and why?

Figuring cost in (stateside prices), which one would you get?

Also, if you know, does it use (a) DSP(s), or just proprietary
hardware; also, how good is the upgrade path?

Thanks all.

P.S.  What's the latest word on how the specs V.fast are coming along?

-JimC
--
James H. Cloos, Jr.		include <std/disclaimers.h>
Cloos@CrnlThry.BITNET           include <std/qotd>
Cloos@Theory.TC.Cornell.EDU	Phone:  +1 716 866-5249
cloos@batcomputer.UUCP		Snail:  POBox 1111, Amherst, NY 14226-1111
From: t8c192@soph.cs.ubc.ca (Michael Angelo Relova)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: USR Dual Standard
Date: 5 Oct 1992 14:07:12 -0700
Organization: none
NNTP-Posting-Host: willow.soph.cs.ubc.ca

I didn't have any problems at all... I sent it out, waited for about a week for the package to arrive at USR... and then I calculate that it took them about 3-5 days to send it out.. total time waited is about 2 weeks... not badd.. I guess I'm one of the luckier ones!! heh

Good luck !
From: schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: ZyXEL EPROM or EEPROM?
Date: 26 Sep 92 13:37:31 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC

In article <csjohn.717455432@knuth> csjohn@knuth.mtsu.edu (The Mad Hatter) writes:
>Hi,
>
>I've got a ZyXEL U1496E with the version 4.13 ROM chips.
>I would like to upgrade to ROM version 5.01, and have
>downloaded the new ROM code from ZyXEL.  A friend of mine
>has a chip programmer, but I am unsure which chip to
>buy.  I know I need a 120ns 1MB chip, but is it an
>EPROM or an EEPROM that I need??  What is the difference
>between the two?  Where is a good source to buy what I need?

You need two 27C010-120 EPROMs.
Any decent chip/memory house should have these.


-- 
_______________________________Mike Schuster________________________________
NY Pub. Access UNIX/Internet: schuster@panix.com | 70346.1745@CompuServe.COM
The Portal (R) System: schuster@cup.portal.com   | MCI Mail,GEnie: MSCHUSTER
From: jwaleke@tcedge.mi.org (Jim Waleke)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Fax Software for Supra
Distribution: world
X-BBS-Software: EXCELSIOR! v0.960
Date: 29 Sep 92 19:37:33 EDT
Organization: EXCELSIOR! Tech Support BBS (313) 77-AMIGA

How fast can the Supra transmit a fax?  14.4k fax?

What software packages out there for WINDOWS AND DOS support this speed or the 
highest the Supra can go?

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: rick@digibd.com (Rick Richardson)
Subject: Re: Only National NS16550's OK/bug-free?
Organization: DigiBoard Incorporated, Eden Prairie, MN
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1992 10:10:20 GMT

gerrit@laosinh.stgt.sub.org (Gerrit Heitsch) writes:

>In article <kurtk.717350790@ee.ualberta.ca>, Kurt Klingbeil writes:

>> There are a few 16550 'compatable' chips available.
>> Presumably some are clones, others are licensed second-sources?
>A friend bought a TL16C550AN (TI) for nearly half the price
>he had to pay for the NS chip.

>> I have heard that ONLY the National-produced chips work reliably,
>> with the possible exception of Goldstar's clone.
>The TL16C550ANs FIFO works for him as he should. He and the software
>he uses can see no difference between the chip from TI and the one from NS.

We ship *hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions* of 16550's in our
serial products, so I went and asked the fellow whose had the most
experience programming those parts.  The following is my summary of his
opinion of 16550's from the more than half dozen vendors of them out there:

	The only 16550 which does not have *any* bugs in its
	implementation is the Western Digital.  Oddly enough,
	the National 16550A (the 16550 was invented by them),
	has a bug where a received character can get stuck in
	the FIFO.  The TI part, which is derived from the
	original National masks, has this particular bug fixed.
	There are a number of other bugs that crop up in the various
	implementations.  All of these problems are very low
	probability or can be worked around in software.

If you don't have control over the software you use and you want
a 16550 that won't ever give you grief, get the Western Digital.

TI would be a good second choice, since they are concerned enough
to fix the bugs in Nationals masks.

Under no circumstances ever buy a National 16550A.  They have bugs
in their masks, and they refuse to fix them.

-Rick
-- 
Rick Richardson		Email: rick@digibd.com	This space intentionally
Senior Staff Engineer	Fax:   (612) 943-0803	blank until 1996 elections.
DigiBoard, Inc.		Tel:   (612) 943-5383
Eden Prairie, MN	Radio: N0NMY
From: kaw@slc1.UUCP (Kwame Workman)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: 25 pin serial connector
Date: 30 Sep 92 16:42:13 GMT
Reply-To: kaw@arinc.com (K. Workman)
Organization: Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Annapolis


I have sort of a dilemma, and I was wondering if anyone could perhaps help 
me out. I've just upgraded the UART on my I/O card to a 16550AFN (COM2) and
have been trying ever since to make the port function, but I seem to be 
doing something strange. In short:

1) Mouse on COM1 (9 pin)
2) 16550 on COM2 (25 pin)
3) internal modem on COM4

I've tried to connect an external Hayes ULTRA to COM2, but I only had a 
25-to-9 pin cable. So, I used my mouse adapter (9-to-25 pin) to connect 
it to the port. This didn't work at all. I had to give up the ULTRA, so I
got my hands on a Hayes 2400 and a new 25-to-25 pin cable. When I tried to
connect it directly to COM2, nothing (no echo, no OK). I then used a 25-9 pin
cable and my mouse adapter and it worked fine. I proved it by calling my 
local mainframe. Now, no matter how I'm connected I can't seem to use 
hardware flow control. It just locks up the machine. I'm getting a new
14.4 external soon, and I want to be able to use hardware flow control.

Any suggestions?

Responses welcome E-mail or  post.

Thanks,

K. Workman
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Distribution: jadpc2
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 08:18:59 -0800
From: Zero_One@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Subject: ZyXEL Quest(shuns)
Comment-To: eadie5295@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Reply-To: Zero_One@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
X-FSC-PATH: 202/701
X-FSC-EID: 10ca 2bd7faa0
X-FSC-PID:  FM+ 2.1

 >   In regards to the ZyXEL 1496B internal fax/modem (the newest
 > version), with
 > voice capability, caller ID, callback security, etc...what is
 > voice capability?
 > Can anyone please explain what this means?  And is the 16.8K data
 > speed
 > compatible with USR 16.8K modems, V.32bis modems, PEP, or is it
 > only between
 > two ZyXEL modems?

 >   And can anyone tell me of somewhere that I can get one for less
 > than $449?
As far as what is voice capability, the modem can be used as an
answering maching.  When the software becomes available it can be a
full fledged voice mail system.  The modem has the ability to save a
voice message to disk.  The 16.8k is only achieved between two ZyXELs
at this time.

Tyrone Horton
(Zero One)
Tech Support
ZyXEL USA

---
 * Origin: -=ZyXEL USA=- 1:103/356.6 (1:103/356.6)
From: sinan@milton.u.washington.edu (Sinan Karasu)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Modem-USRob. Sportster
Keywords: modems USRobotics Sportster Sun
Date: 4 Oct 92 20:26:01 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

Does anyone out there have the US Robotics Sportster 14400 Fax modem
hooked up and running in data mode on suns? I have 2 in the office(new) 
which I am trying to get running on a Sun 4/490. They work -sortof- they 
just won't answer until sometimes the 7th ring, sometimes 1st, 
sometimes 3rd.....You get the picture.... Auto answer
is on and the codes claim that it is set to answer on the first ring but...
It doesn't look like it even sees the ring. On the one at home on a Sun SS1
it doesn't answer at all- ever. If you call in to it it rings once then goes to
a fast busy signal (whatever that means!).

I can put other US Robotics modems in place with no problems (with the 
same setup) but not these.
I am close to returning them but thought maybe someone had run into this.
Any help would be appreciated.

Sinan
From: eng20204@nusunix1.nus.sg (LEE MUH HWA)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ZyXEL
Date: 28 Sep 92 03:50:21 GMT
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

I am intending to purchase a ZyXEL modem. However, it is not available locally in
Singapore. Can anyone tell the mailing address of ZyXEL in taiwan or any ZyXEL
representative in Asia?

Thanks.

Muh Hwa
eng20204@nusunix1.nus.sg