HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles Lin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Trivia Quiz
Date: 31 Aug 92 02:08:45 GMT
Reply-To: clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles C. Lin)
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity of Uniland, College Park

In article <1992Aug28.215852.29717@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, clc5q@uvacs.cs.Virginia.EDU (Clark L. Coleman) writes:
> 
> Here are a few simple True-False questions:

  Simple for Clark...

> 
> 1) Jimmy Arias has never won a title at a grand slam event.

   Well, never a singles title, at least at the pro level.  I
doubt he was good enough for a doubles win either.  His best
shot would be in a mixed doubles win.

> 
> 2) Kevin Curren has won 4 titles at grand slam events.

   Perhaps, with doubles partner, Steve Denton.  He's reached
the finals twice.  Once in a loss to Becker, and once in a loss
to Wilander (in Australia).  I think that's true because I
recall a semifinal match against Ben Testerman in which
it seemed Testerman would win, but ended up losing in five.

> 
> 3) Derrick Rostagno has the best tour record in 5 set matches (minimum of
>      10 five set matches in career).

   Yes, I think this is true.  Someone has a record of like 21-4,
which is rather amazing.

> 
> 4) Ivan Lendl won his first doubles title before his first singles title.

  Augh, and you recently posted his doubles victories.  I would say no.

> 5) Boris Becker and John McEnroe played the longest Davis Cup match since
>     the tiebreaker was invented: 6 hours, 20 minutes, in 1987.

   Second longest.  Wilander and McEnroe played for 6 hours and 37 minutes
if I recall, in the 1982 Davis Cup.

> 6) Ivan Lendl achieved the highest computer ranking points ever when he was
>      #1 in 1987.

   Hmm, 1982 was a better year, for sure.  And Wilander had three
Grand Slam wins in 1988.  Still, computer points being what they
are....

> 
> 7) Guillermo Vilas never won a doubles title.

   He didn't play that much doubles.  But never?  He played some
in Davis Cup.  But, heck,  I'll choose false.

> 8) Ivan Lendl made it to the finals in doubles at a grand slam event.

    I think that's false, unless it was very early in his career.
I'm not sure that Lendl play doubles in Grand Slam events.

> 
> 9) In 1982, Peter Fleming became #1 in the doubles rankings, moving ahead
>     of his most frequent partner, John McEnroe.

   Oh, that's possible.  These things happen.  Fleming was even
top 10 at one point in his career.

> 
> 10) In the thousands of ATP sanctioned matches in 1991, only 4 were decided
>      by a score of 6-0, 6-0.
> 

    If this is false, it's certainly a lousy question (no, it was 5,
or 12 or 3).  So, by that reasoning, it must be true.

--
Charles Lin
clin@eng.umd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Re: U.S. Open Seedings
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 14:58:35 GMT

In article <1992Aug28.122842.65074@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman) writes:

>>Women's Seedings
>>1. Monica Seles
>>2. Steffi Graf
>>
>>This is the first #1 seed at the Open for Seles, and also the first for
>>Jim Courier.

>Wasn't Monica seeded #1 last year, too?  I believe she was numero uno in the
>world then also.

No, Seles was seeded #2 last year. For a short while in the
summer of 1991, Seles ranked #2 because she lost to Capriati
in the final in San Diego and Date (who ranked >100 at the time)
upset Sabatini in the semi in Los Angeles. Seles beat Date in
the final but couldn't get enough bonus points to stay #1.

-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     HR 1A-304, AT&T Bell Labs, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ, 07748 USA
From: marmoset@mondo.engin.umich.edu (Dave Walker)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Probably FAQ but... Where is tennis.c?
Date: 29 Aug 92 22:13:19 GMT
Article-I.D.: zip.1992Aug29.221319.21660
Organization: Computer Aided Engineering Network (CAEN), University of Michigan
Originator: marmoset@mondo.engin.umich.edu

Subject says it all.  Archie draws a blank, and I'd *really* like
to be able to find this before the US Open starts up.

Any pointers to the correct FTP site(s) would be appreciated.

| Dave Walker, Detroit Art Services (DAS)                                |
|                                          "I don't read, I just guess"  |
| marmoset@mondo.engin.umich.edu       -Happy Mondays, "Wrote For Luck"  |
|                                                                        |
| President, Sluggin' Fer Monica Fan Club                                |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Re: ATP Rankings (was: US Open prediction)
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 01:07:28 GMT


We might have beaten this issue to death already. It looks like
only a few of us in the US are interested in this topic, so I am
restricting the distribution.

I think Clark Coleman's explanation to this strange ranking
situation is right. Some tournament are held a week later
this year compared to last year. Therefore, players have already
"lost" the points they received 52 weeks ago coming into
the tournaments. Therefore, some of them "gained" points
in the week after the tournament although they didn't do
as well as last year. Take Korda as an example:

August 10: 2058 points
August 17: 1860 points
August 24: 1895 points

So Korda indeed lost points because he didn't defend his title
at Volvo, but one has to compare his points between 8/10 and 24
to see the effect.

Unfortunately for Lendl, he has lost the points form winning
Hamlet last year before he has a chance to defend them. He has
no title at all in the last 52 weeks and is therefore seeded
#9 at the US Open.
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     HR 1A-304, AT&T Bell Labs, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ, 07748 USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: clc5q@uvacs.cs.Virginia.EDU (Clark L. Coleman)
Subject: Consecutive Years Ranked in Top 10 and Top 5
Originator: clc5q@hemlock.cs.Virginia.EDU
Organization: University of Virginia Computer Science Department
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 14:20:35 GMT

Consecutive years in the top 10 in the year end rankings:

Jimmy Connors    16    1973-1988
Ivan Lendl       12+   1980-1991
Guillermo Vilas   9    1974-1982
Bjorn Borg        8    1974-1981
John McEnroe      8    1978-1985
Mats Wilander     7    1982-1988
Boris Becker      7+   1985-1991
Stefan Edberg     7+   1985-1991
Vitas Gerulaitis  6    1977-1982
Yannick Noah      6    1982-1987
Ilie Nastase      5    1973-1977
Eddie Dibbs       4    1976-1979
Jose-Luis Clerc   4    1980-1983
Gene Mayer        4    1980-1983
Andre Agassi      4+   1988-1991
Arthur Ashe       3    1973-1975
Rod Laver         3    1973-1975
Ken Rosewall      3    1973-1975
Manuel Orantes    3    1975-1977
Brian Gottfried   3    1976-1978
Raul Ramirez      3    1976-1978
Harold Solomon    3    1978-1980
Miloslav Mecir    3    1985-1987


Consecutive years in the top 5 in the year end rankings:

Jimmy Connors    13    1973-1985
Ivan Lendl       11+   1981-1991
Bjorn Borg        8    1974-1981
John McEnroe      8    1978-1985
Stefan Edberg     7+   1985-1991
Boris Becker      6+   1986-1991
Mats Wilander     6    1983-1988
Vitas Gerulaitis  3    1977-1979
John Newcombe     2    1973-1974
Guillermo Vilas   2    1974-1975,1977-1978
Manuel Orantes    2    1975-1976
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It is seldom that any liberty is lost all at once." David Hume
|||  clc5q@virginia.edu (Clark L. Coleman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Re: US OPEN Women's Singles - Draw
Organization: AT&T
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 08:52:22 GMT


If we take out the unseeded players, the draw looks like this:


               Seles (1) --------+
                                 |--------+
            Novotna (10) --------+        |
                                          |--------+
             Sukova (13) --------+        |        |
                                 |--------+        |
            Capriati (6) --------+                 |
                                                   |--------+
            Sabatini (4) --------+                 |        |
                                 |--------+        |        |
              Huber (11) --------+        |        |        |
                                          |--------+        |
             Pierce (16) --------+        |                 |
                                 |--------+                 |
      M.J. Fernandez (7) --------+                          |
                                                            +--------> Champion
            Martinez (8) --------+                          |
                                 |--------+                 |
   Maleeva-Fragniere (9) --------+        |                 |
                                          |--------+        |
         K. Maleeva (15) --------+        |        |        |
                                 |--------+        |        |
         Navratilova (3) --------+                 |        |
                                                   |--------+
             Sanchez (5) --------+                 |
                                 |--------+        |
           Garrison (14) --------+        |        |
                                          |--------+
            Tauziat (12) --------+        |
                                 |--------+
                Graf (2) --------+


For her standard, Seles has been struggling lately, losing in
three straight finals. She could have another show down with
Capriati in the quarter final. Graf is having shoulder problems
again and is also battling yet another viral infection.
Sabatini just lost to Meskhi 6-0, 6-3 (yes, 6-0, 6-3!!) in the
quarter final in San Diego yesterday; she could be continuing
her pattern from last year: having a sub-par second half of
the year. Therefore, potentially, there may be some surprises
this year.
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     HR 1A-304, AT&T Bell Labs, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ, 07748 USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles Lin)
Subject: US Open, Tuesday comments (spoilers)
Originator: clin@modulation.eng.umd.edu
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity von Uniland, College Park
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 00:03:01 GMT


   I saw a few games out of the Becker-Curren match.  I hate to
criticize a player (no, I don't), but Curren can't play.  That's
a bit harsh.   I put him in the same category as somebody like
Mayotte.  A good serve and volleyer whose groundstrokes and
movement need a bit of work.   Becker should easily win this
match.  He hits much better groundstrokes than Curren, and
moves a bit better.  Curren is one of the older folks still
on the tour at around 34.  His serve, which used to be one of the
best, is all right.  He serves in the mid 100 mile per hour
range.  This is comparable to Edberg or McEnroe.

   Still, even with a 0-40 lead on Curren in the second game,
Curren had two good serves and a volley(?) to finally win this
game.  Commentators said that Becker used to not lose those
kinds of games.  I would normally say this should have been
a mismatch, but I didn't see the rest of the match, so I
can't say.

   Back to yesterday,  Ivanisevic played Rosset.   Seems that
both of them use Head (Polaris?) racquets.  Perhaps even the
same model.   The funny thing is that despite having very
good serves, both still like to play the backcourt.  I think
this has to do with their European upbringing or something.
Neither are tremendous in the backcourt, though Ivanisevic
is somewhat better.  I think he won in straight sets, something
like 6-4, 6-4, 6-4.

   Also, on serving.  It seems that in the old days, (early
80's), anyone who could serve in the low 100 mile per hour
range was considered to have a pretty big serve.  Edberg,
Lendl, and McEnroe all had serves (and still do) in this
range.  Occasionally there were some harder servers (I
saw Jarryd hit some in the mid 110 mile per hour range,
and Steve Denton and Chip Hooper were supposed to be
hard servers) but they were typically not consistent enough
in the other parts of the games to be a threat.  Nowadays,
there are quite a few players who can serve into the 110 miles
per hour and up to 120 mile per hour range.  Rosset and
Ivanisevic are two.  Becker, Forget, Sampras are some others.
Even Chang can hit it as hard as 118 miles per hour though
I have yet to see him do this consistently.

   Still, even a 100 mile per hour serve seems to be good enough
if placed correctly.

--
Charles Lin
clin@eng.umd.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles Lin)
Subject: Re: US Open - Wednesday play (spoilers)
Reply-To: clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles C. Lin)
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity of Uniland, College Park
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 05:55:31 GMT

   By the way, if I did not mention it, Ellis Ferreira is
also from South Africa.  A commentator commented that
maybe Ferreira's were the Smith and Jones of South Africa
(i.e., since Wayne and Ellis aren't related, the name
is probably very common in South Africa).

--
Charles Lin
clin@eng.umd.edu
From: probal@pepper.rutgers.edu (Probal Kumar Bhattacharjya)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: URGENT - US Open Ticket !!!
Keywords: Ticket, US Open, Early rounnds
Date: 26 Aug 92 15:51:59 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.


Hi Netters,
	I was planning to go and watch US Open this year at least for
one day. I got tired of calling Ticket Master and finding it busy. Is
there any way to get ticket on the spot or from some other source( may 
be at higher price )? 
	Is there any day-to-day sale of ticket like they have
it in Wimbledon ? I know that later part of the tournament will be hot
and it'd be more difficult to get ticket. So any of the first few days
is fine with me.
	So ... would some knowledgeable netter give me info. regarding
buying ticket from any other agent or on the spot ? Also, how easy is
it to talk to Ticket Master ? I always find them busy !!!
		Thanks,
		  --Probal.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: moisan@cicb.fr (Herve Moisan -  stagiaire CICB)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: romanian : Saceanu
Date: 31 Aug 92 08:10:55 GMT
Organization: CICB, Universite' de Rennes I, FR

Saceanu is now german but i think he was romanian.
he won for the moment 2 or 3 turnaments, he's a good grass player...


there is a young player of 17 years very good, i don't remember the name
i think he did well in RG 1991 at 17 years !



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Herve Moisan	CICB Campus de Beaulieu 	35042 Rennes Cedex   France
Phone:  99 36 71 38	
E-mail: moisan@cicb.fr	
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: ravikane@leland.Stanford.EDU (Ravindra Shantaram Kane)
Subject: Re: Trivia of interest-- Borg
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 92 20:28:11 GMT


The famous borg-mac match was in 1980 @ wimbledon. The tiebreak was in
the fourth set, not the fifth. Mac won the tiebreak(I think 19-17), I 
am not quite sure. But Borg still won the title
From: clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles Lin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Opinions on Mizunos
Date: 27 Aug 92 09:58:54 GMT
Reply-To: clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles C. Lin)
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity of Uniland, College Park


   Anybody ever tested a Mizuno?   It always seems that Lendl
selects racquets that are hard to get in the US.  The three
racquet companies he's been with are Mizuno, Adidas, and
Volkl?   I'm sure Clark knows the answer.   I remember watching
the Cuore Cup (held in Italy) with Lendl facing Kevin Curren.
I believe the announcer confused Lendl with Curren since
Current used to wear Adidas, and Lendl had some special
contract in Italy to wear a different line of clothing
and use a different racquet.   Then, I think he went
to an all Adidas contract before going to all Mizuno.

   I have seen one of the Lendl Mizuno's, and it looks
like the old Adidas (not that I ever saw that) in that
it was very thick in the throat area, but it wasn't a
demo racquet.

--
Charles Lin
clin@eng.umd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: eddie@chpc.utexas.edu (Eddie Hedges)
Subject: Birthday Gift
Keywords: to Jimmy Connors
Organization: The University of Texas System CHPC
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 17:38:26 GMT

Source: today's The New York Times (I found it in out library after lunch).

 New York will sing "Happy Birthday" to Jimmy Connors tomorrow night
on the Stadium Court of the National Tennis Center. It will be his
40th and what a coincidence that his first round match with Jaime
Oncins of Brazil happened to fall on it.
 John McEnroe is featured tonight.

This, of cource, is not the entire article.

Eddie
-- 
Eddie Hedges          
eddie@chpc.utexas.edu
From: gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: US Open SPOILERS: Mon & Tue results
Date: 3 Sep 92 20:33:56 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <BtysnE.GAp@apollo.hp.com>, johnf@apollo.hp.com (John Francis) writes
:
[stuff deleted]

>M1-02:<qualifier>               Andrei Chesnokov          ?
Albano, Argentina                                         *6-4,6-3,6-3


>M1-22:<qualifier>               David Wheaton             ?
Szdajder, Canada                                          *6-3,6-7,6-3,6-4


>M1-27:<qualifier>               <qualifier>               ?
Daivs, US   v. Rivera, Chile     Davis won  6-4,6-7,6-3,6-4


>M1-33:Petr Korda (6)            Emilio Sanchez            ?
                                                        *6-2,4-6,2-6,6-1,7-6

>M1-44:Richey Reneberg           Henri Leconte             ?

*6-4,3-6,6-1,6-2

>M1-46:Andrei Cherkasov          Arnaud Boetsch            ?
                                  *6-4,6-1,7-6

>M1-48:Wayne Ferreira            Michael Chang (4)         ?
                                     *6-3,6-4,7-6

>M1-55:Jaime Oncins              Jimmy Connors             ?

*6-1,6-2,6-2
>M1-56:Jaime Yzaga               Ivan Lendl (9)            ?
*6-7,6-1,7-5,4-6,6-3

>M1-64:Luiz Mattar               Stefan Edberg (2)         ?
*7-5,7-5,6-2
-- 

        ***********************
        *   Gail A. Fullman   *
        *   Manager - ADMO    *
        *   Ext. 83113        *
        ***********************
From: gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: WTA Women's Ranking: August 30
Date: 3 Sep 92 13:25:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: knex.gate.0s2iqB1w165w

The WTA top 50 ranked singles players
       (Through August 30th):
 1. Monica Seles, Yugoslavia, 275.5235
 2. Steffi Graf, Germany, 250.8379
 3. Martina Navratilova, United States, 202.3910
 4. Gabriela Sabatini, Argentina, 190.1250
 5. Arantxa Sanchez, Spain, 154.8804
 6. Jennifer Capriati, United States, 124.9028
 7. Mary Joe Fernandez, United States, 101.9391
 8. Conchita Martinez, Spain, 100.0440
 9. Anke Huber, Germany, 84.8333
10. Manuela Maleeva, Switzerland, 79.7083

11. Jana Novotna, Czechoslovakia, 73.7813
12. Nathalie Tauziat, France, 67.2950
13. Zina Garrison, United States, 62.0106
14. Helena Sukova, Czechoslovakia, 61.2382
15. Katerina Maleeva, Bulgaria, 60.0879
16. Mary Pierce, France, 57.9167
17. Amy Frazier, United States, 56.9150
18. Leila Meskhi, Georgia, 54.1533
19. Amanda Coetzer, South Africa, 54.0714
20. Lori McNeil, United States, 52.8119
 
21. Sabine Appelmans, Belgium, 50.5722
22. Judith Wiesner, Austria, 48.1667
23. Julie Halard, France, 47.3022
24. Kimiko Date, Japan, 45.8929
25. Barbara Rittner, Germany, 45.0000
26. Natalia Zvereva, Belarus, 42.8611
27. Magdalena Maleeva, Bulgaria, 42.5071
28. Radka Zrubakova, Czechoslovakia, 41.3826
29. Naoko Sawamatsu, Japan, 36.7500
30. Brenda Schultz, Netherlands, 35.5714

31. Gigi Fernandez, United States, 33.3579
32. Laura Gildemeister, Peru, 32.9333
33. Pam Shriver, United States, 30.9167
34. Sabine Hack, Germany, 30.4412
35. Natalia Medvedeva, Ukraine, 29.1944
36. Patricia Hy, Canada, 29.1333
37. Jo Durie, Britain, 28.8533
38. Ines Gorrochategui, Argentina, 28.2500
39. Karina Habsudova, Czechoslovakia, 27.4765
40. Andrea Strnadova, Czechoslovakia, 27.0550

41. Larissa Savchenko, Latvia, 25.6059
42. Nicole Provis, Australia, 25.3900
43. Manon Bollegraf, Netherlands, 25.3846
44. Rachel McQuillan, Australia, 24.1941
45. Ann Grossman, United States, 24.0500
46. Yayuk Basuki, Indonesia, 23.9056
47. Linda Harvey-Wild, United States, 23.6591
48. Emanuela Zardo, Switzerland, 23.6429
49. Barbara Paulus, Austria, 23.5250
50. Sandra Cecchini, Italy, 23.2941

==================
WTA RANKING METHOD
==================

Players are awarded round points for each round they win plus 
bonus points for each win over a player ranked in the Virginia Slims
Top 500. Total points (round + bonus) are divided by the number of
tournaments played (minimum divisor of 12) to arrive at an average.
Points stay valid for 52 weeks from the date of the tournament.
Players must have at least 3 tournament appearances to appear in the
rankings.

GeSS
--
Gess Shankar      |<><>|Internet: gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM                |<><>|
Knowledge Exchange|<><>|{rutgers,ogicse,gatech}!emory!gwinnett!knex!gess|<><>|
From: clc5q@uvacs.cs.Virginia.EDU (Clark L. Coleman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Past U.S. Open Results for the 16 Seeded Men
Date: 28 Aug 92 14:45:17 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia Computer Science Department
Originator: clc5q@hemlock.cs.Virginia.EDU

How the 16 men's seeds have done in past U.S. Opens:

W=won
F=lost in finals
SF=lost in semifinals
QF=lost in quarterfinals
4=lost in 4th round
3=lost in 3rd round
2=lost in 2nd round
1=lost in 1st round
-=did not play


               1977  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91
               ----  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --
Courier (1)      --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   2   3   2   F
Edberg (2)       --  --  --  --  --  --   1   2   4  SF  SF   4   4   1   W
Sampras (3)      --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   1   4   W  QF
Chang (4)        --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   2   4   4   3   4
Ivanisevic (5)   --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   2   3   4
Korda (6)        --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   1  --   2   1
Becker (7)       --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   4  SF   4   2   W  SF   3
Agassi (8)       --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   1   1  SF  SF   F   1
Lendl (9)        --  --   2  QF   4   F   F   F   W   W   W   F   F  QF  SF
Costa (10)       --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --
Stich (11)       --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   1   2  QF
Ferreira (12)    --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   2
Forget (13)      --  --  --  --  --  --   1   1   2   2   3   2  --   1   2
Washington (14)  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   2   2   3
Krajicek (15)    --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --   1
McEnroe (16)      4  SF   W   W   W  SF   4   W   F   1  QF   2   2  SF   3
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It is seldom that any liberty is lost all at once." David Hume
|||  clc5q@virginia.edu (Clark L. Coleman)
From: mhytti@cs.joensuu.fi (Mika Hyttinen)
Subject: I would want info about Manuela Maleeva
Organization: University of Joensuu
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 14:23:19 GMT


	Hi !

	Could you help me ?  
        I'd want info about Manuela Maleeva, all kind of stuff is very welcome
	Thanks in advice.

       Mika.
-- 
	" .signature" No such file or directory.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: bose@deca.cs.umn.edu (Ashim Bose)
Subject: Opinions on Prince Vortex?
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 22:36:35 GMT

Hi tennis lovers.  Anybody have any opinions on the Prince Vortex?  Does
its performance justify the rrrrreallllly high price (>$250)?  How is it
different from the earlier CTS series?

Ashim
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis