HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: PREDICTION R US, NY AFFILIATE
From: Nelson Broat <NMBCU@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Date: Wednesday, 30 Dec 1992 10:58:47 EST
Organization: City University of New York/ University Computer Center


My playoff predictions...

Here we go...

And remember...you can trust ;) these picks!

Beagles versus Da Aints
***********************

This will be a hard fought defensive struggle with the Aints coming out
on top. Reason: Revenge for the loss in Philly at the beginning of the
season, and the need to prove to the world that they really can win "A"
playoff game. Once done, they get to be trounced on by dem CowPokes.
Aint that a hoot! ;-)

Da S..Aints 23 - Beagles 17

Vi-queens versus Washed up n' Skinned
*************************************

My poor poor dear ole delusional father still thinks his bite sized purple
people eaters are going to go all the way...again! ...

Sometimes he just breaks me up...and when I was wittle he did! :)

Anyways, the Vi-queens have no QB, therefore this will be easy pickins
for a Washed up team, who next week shall be skinned by some Whiner Miner
49ers. Only hope for the Vi-queens...multiple interceptions run back for TD's,
otherswise...next year Daddy...next year.

Washed up n' Skinned 35 - Vi-queens 13

HOUse of Lame versus Buffalo Chips
**********************************

This one's easy! <== I'm saying this??? :)

Those slippery and Oily devils from the House of Lame shall travel to
Buffalo and finish the job I hired them for, and that was...to totally
anhilate the Buffalo Chip Bills.

I'm sorry but it had to be done. I just couldn't take another boring
Super Bowl featuring the Bronco Ponies or these guys.

HOUse of Lame 31 - Buffalo Chips 18  (yeah I know...its a weird score,
                                      but that goes without saying, as this
                                      will be a weird game)


KC and The Sunshine Band versus Chris Berman's BOLTERGIEST
**********************************************************

This is a tough one to swallow, as I'd really like to see the Chargers
advance, but without Stan Humphries who may be out because of a
separated shoulder, they don't have a prayer. That and the fact that
The Sunshine Band has previous playoff experience (no fond memories :)
just the experience) will mean that BOLTERGIST won't stand a ghost
of a chance. I know...bad pun...t :)

KC and The Sunshine Band 28 - BOLTERGIST 5

                                                  Idiotic, Outrageous,
                                               Ridiculous, Mindboggling,

                                                 yet quite blase' :-)

                                             Predictions R Us,NY Affiliate

                                             "If you didn't pickem...nyah nyah
                                                you had your chance. :-)"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dansmith@mcopn2.dseg.ti.com (Dan Smith)
Subject: Re: Vikings Playoff chances/QB
Reply-To: dansmith@mcopn2.dseg.ti.com
Organization: Texas Instruments, Inc.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 18:57:40 GMT

In article 8183@bmw.mayo.edu, bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson) writes:
>
>
>
>

 (Various stuff deleted)

>->>>>Are you a guy or a gal???  Either way, you don't know what you are talking 
>->>>>about.
>->>>
>->>What the H**l is this? My wife knows more about football, college or pro than
>->>about 75% of men. She knows individual and team stats, coaches, players and
>->>where they came from, how they did in college, Super Bowl Stats, the play-off
>->>tie breakers and an infinite amount of strategy, offensive and defensive.
>->>
>->>Whenever we enter a football pool she has about 90% accuracy and can tell
>->>you the playoff picture during each Sunday game and what the affect of each
>->>game has on the playoff picture.
>->>
>->>So don't think that males have a lock on the love of football.
>->>
>->>Personally I believe you don't think at all.
>->>
>->>>
>->>>What does this person's sex have to do with their analysis? What, men can't
>->>>discuss things rationally? Or women can't? I think you are out of line here.
>->>>Leave a person's sex out of the discussion and just respond to the posting.
>->>>
>->>>Well, that is enough flaming, you will probably get more publicly on the net.
>->>>I have to admit though, I think your posting merits a public apology.
>->>                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>->>Hear Hear! I agree.
>->>>
>->>>Tom Wolf
>->
>->Hey butthead!!!,
>->
>->The poster signed the name Kim... All I think he wanted to know is wether
>->or not "kim" was a female. I know both male and female "Kims".
>->
>->Let's cut this over-sensitive shit out! We're starting to sound like a bunch
>->of militant feminists for god's sake.
>->

 well put. This over-sensitive crap gets on my nerves. I mean, come on. I can't
 tell you how many times I've received E-Mail or a post from someone with a 
 name that can be a male or female name. It makes you curious as to who you are
 talking to. That's all. Curious. So give a guy (excuse me person) a break and
 lay off it.
From: heavy-metal@vnet.ibm.com
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 13:43:24 CST
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Viking vs Packer History Comparison

Chad Bergerson@mayo.edu wrote (approximate quotation)
>Vikes                                 Pack
>1992: 11-5 Clinched on the road, a    1992: 9-7 Not Good Enough
       tough AFC team

NOT!! First of all, the Vikes will EASILY be 10-6 only winning the division
due to a mere technicality in the tie breaker system. The Packers will also
be 10-6 and will be a much better team than the Vikes. I can only hope that
the Packers take the third wildcard and can therefor trounce the Vikings two
weekends in the row. Its just tooooo good to be true.

And as for clinching against a tough team, the Vikings stumbled into that
victory. What a lifeless boring game. Its a crying shame that Pittsburgh
couldn't have one.

Furthermore, I don't care if I get flamed. I'm sick of all the fair weather
Viking fans I here going on about how great their sub-par team is. The Vikes
are just lucky that the season isn't a few weeks longer, because they would
get ground into the dust.

I'll take a Vikingburger, please!

Green Bay Bob
**6 in a row, with the vikes rolling over for 7**

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske)
Subject: Re: Status of Cris Carter??
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 19:47:33 GMT

On radio this morning Coach Green said that Carter will practice today.
He's been fitted with some sort of protective device (a clamp to hold
his collar bone together? :)).  Green said that he would like to get
Carter into Saturday's game, but that's about all he said.

John Ganske
From: markl@spuddy.uucp (Mark Liversedge)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The Dynasty Continues..........
Date: 19 Dec 92 13:11:03 GMT
Organization: Spuddy's Public Usenet Domain

In article <1992Dec15.211224.1849@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna) writes:
>In article <1giiubINNpp1@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, lpc4@po.CWRU.Edu (Lawrence P. Colucci) writes:
>> 
>> ONe of the main reasons that the 49ers win much of the time is the
>> smae thing that is happening to baseball - money.  The owner of the
>
>I dont think that money is happening to baseball. The Pirates are one
>of the smallest markets; they dont even fill up the stadium, yet they
>just win baby.

[stuff deleted]

Absolutely. The trouble is football is THE worst for money, nothing
else comes close not EVEN Italian soccer.

And now free-agency is coming in maybe the NFC East can really start
to dominate.

Oh Goody! Just what I wanted..... NOT! NOT! NOT!

-- 

 * Meeeow ! Call Spuddy on (0203) 638780/638693 for FREE mail & Usenet access *
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: It wasn't Pretty (49ers WON)
Organization: Gizmonic Institute - Home of the "Big G Burger"
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 00:12:25 GMT

<1992Dec28.231418.8563@netcom.com> mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:
><1992Dec28.222825.3546@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
>><1992Dec25.082049.23606@netcom.com> xtifr@netcom.com (Chris Waters) :
>>><1992Dec24.220626.10700@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) :
>>>But this is the first year that Young has started the season as 1st
>>>string.  So, it's a little early to expect him to have a whole heck of a
>>>lot of playoff victories.  :-)
>
>>Excuse me?  I could have sworn that was him starting the first game in
>>1991.
>
>Sure it was.  Because the first string QB was hurt.  What's your point,
>Storga?

The point is obvious:  Young was 1st string at the start of the '91
season.

>>Oops.  Doesn't sound like he's very consistent.  Something that always set
>>QB's apart (in my own rating system) is their consistency.
>
>Yeah, I can see it now:
...
>1. Must have played at least 50% of his games in Cowboy Stadium (50 points)
>2. Must have worn a white uniform at least 80% (35 points)
>3. Must think Tom Landry is God (or at least Jesus with a haircut) (10 points)
>4. Everything else (5 points)

I never claimed that a QB had to be a Cowboy player to be a good or great
QB.  I think Montana was one of the best QBs, so was Unitas, so is Elway,
so is Marino, so was Staubach.

>>Many QB's are capable of leading a team to victory.  Many have this year.
>>Right now, before the Monday game against the powerhouse Lions, Aikman has
>>led his team to just as many victories as Young.  Why wouldn't Aikman be
>>MVP in this case?
>
>Do we have two Gordon Storgas on the net (the mind reels)?  Or was that
>some other Bowboy fan who was decrying Aikman as the second coming of 
>Dieter Brock after the loss to the Deadskins?

I was merely using Chris's logic.  I don't mind someone cutting down an
article but you seem to be deliberately trying to deceive by cutting out
what I was responding to.

>So, if it comes to it, Gordon, why don't we have a BET??

Sorry, I don't bet.


Gordon
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
From: rorry@cs.umd.edu (Ningda Rorry Li)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Houston Oilers Wk16
Date: 25 Dec 92 17:24:07 GMT
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742

------------------------------------------------------------------

TEAM
Houston Oilers (9-6)

NEXT OPPONENT
Buffalo

GAME SUMMARY

           Houston    Cleveland*
Pts        17         14
Rushing    22-106     33-145
Pass Att   19-34-2    17-26-3
Pass Yds   212        140
Fum Lost   1          0
Poss       27:43      32:17

PASSING
Carlson    19-34-2-248 2P

RUSHING
White      16-70
Carlson    5-28
Slaughter  1-8

RECEIVING
White      6-105
Duncan     4-41 1T
Givins     4-38 1T
Slaughter  3-44
Jeffires   2-20

KICKING
Del Greco  2X F(47)

SACKS
(none)

INTERCEPTIONS
Gray       1
Jackson    1
Graf       1

INJURIES
(none)

GAME SUMMARY
Two offensive TDs in the last 3 minutes of the game to win.

NEWS ITEMS
-- Secured a playoff spot, although a road wildcard again.
-- Eight players voted to Pro Bowl.

OTHER NOTES 
*= Home Team
P= Touchdown Pass Thrown
T= Touchdowns Scored
F= Field Goal Scored (number in parens is distance)
X= Extra Point Scored
PASSING: completions,attempts,interceptions, TD passes

This posting follows the proposed format of the NFL TEAM STAT PROJECT.
Contact Jason Parker - jason@cray.com to sign-up and enter your
favorite team.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Is there one HONEST Bills fan?
Date: 3 Jan 93 23:12:52 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1993Jan3.220421.7381@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:
>FACTS:  The FAT LADY CHOKED and the DA BILLS came back
>to win the greatest come from behind game in  
>NFL HISTORY. 38-41
>

More like the Oilers started clling stupid plays when they were up (why pass
when you can run out the clock? why pass on 2nd and short inside the Bills 20?
why ask why?).

The Bills did a grat job caming back from such a defecit but I wonder about
Pardee.  Wonder what he thinks of the prevent defense now??

>
>FACTS:  Beebe stepped out of bounds and it was not
>called and he ran in for a TD. Although this COULD HAVE
>been the game for the Oilers, IMHO, I believe Da Bills
>WOULD HAVE found a way to win this one. 

This is true but no one made a big deal out of it because the Oilers probably
figure "hey instead of being up 35-10, we're up 35-17".  The folks making
the most noise about this play were the announcers.  The way the Oilers
secondary was being toasted by the Bills WRs in the second half, they stil
would have managed to win this.

>-- 
> ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
>"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
>everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller

satish nair
ray is gone!
From: timl@zulu.mti.sgi.com (Tim Layman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 49ers/Cowboys :QB problems? Thoughts?
Date: 31 Dec 92 22:00:59 GMT
Reply-To: timl@mti.sgi.com
Organization: Mips Technologies Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: zulu.mti.sgi.com

In article <1992Dec31.013010.6631@netcom.com>, mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael
Zimmers) writes:
|> In article <1992Dec30.234109.21533@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon
|> Storga) writes:
|> 
|> ><1992Dec30.064806.21142@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>
|> marshall@NEBULA.SSD.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM writes:
|> 
|> >>In fairness, let's quote a more meaningful defensive stat : "points
|> allowed
|> >>per game". The 49ers rank 3rd here. Add to that the fact that they are
|> >>first in the most important stat : "points scored".
|> 
|> >Sorry, old boy.  The 9ers rank 6th in points allowed per game. If you are
|> >going to woof at least get the stats right.  BTW, my stats do not include
|> >the MNF game so it's possible that the 9ers position could move either way
|> >a tad.
|> 
|> According to yesterday's SJMN:
|> 
|> New Orleans:	202 PA
|> Pittsburgh:	225 PA
|> San Francisco:	236 PA
|> 
|> with everybody else trailing.
|> 
|> Your pre-MNF stats are indeed obsolete, and by more than a tad.
|> 
|> Now where it really gets interesting:
|> 
|> San Francisco:	195 PF-PA
|> Dallas:		166
|> New Orleans:	128
|> Minnesota:	125
|> 

	In all fairness though, about 80 of those 195 PF-PA's came from the
two Atlanta games. The first game of the season they beat the Giants by about
14ish?
(Somebody please help me with these numbers...) The two that they lost were
Buffalo 
by 3 points and Phoenix by about 10ish so the negative side of those equations
are
pretty small. So the other 11 wins were by an average of about a touchdown and
2/3rd's
a field goal. That is ~100/11 = 9ish.
	What I'm trying to say is that they didn't really trounce a lot of teams.
In fact most of the games were pretty close. (Even New England!)
	Here's to a few blowouts in the playoffs :^) I don't think my heart can take
much more of this.

	Tim
|> 
|> -- 
|> Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
|> SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
|> Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
From: kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Low SAQ play by SF 49ers + Giants!
Date: 22 Dec 92 20:58:44 GMT
Distribution: na

In article <1992Dec20.055551.17111@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
> kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi) writes:
> >
> >  If you are going to pass, try a higher 
> >  percentage play than the fly to Rice.
> 
> If you're going to criticize coaches, try picking up on somebody 
> whose winning percentage is slightly lower than Seifert. 


Does that means that one is never allowed to criticize any play Siefert
and co. call? I thought that privilege was only reserved for Bill "genius"
Walsh.

It was not a smart play to call in that situation, no matter
what. One doesn't risk giving the opponent an extra time-out in that situation.
If you want to get the 1st down by a pass, try a pass play that has a 
higher chance of working than a timing pattern like the one they tried. 


> >* Ray *MUST* stay.  #) #)
> I rest my case.
> --Gidi

You are taking it out of context. My previous comment was on how helpful
Handley's Giants were to the Chargers chances of winning the AFCWest. Can't
you make out the tongue-in-cheek even after I put the smileys in there??



_______________________________________________________
| Prashanth                    |                      |
| U. of California @ San Diego | prash@raman.ucsd.edu |
#######################################################
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: smaus@nyx.cs.du.edu (Scott Maus)
Subject: NEW VIKING QB?!
Summary: desparate
Keywords: Sean, 
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 22:00:11 GMT


I have a feeling that Dennis Green and the Vikings organization will sit
down after the season is over and start to have talks with none other than
---- JOE MONTANA!!!  What better choice to have especially since Green
used to be on the SF crew!!

M
MONTANA WILL BECOME A VIKING IN 1993 ! ! ! ! !

SCOTT
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: EAGLES IN SUPER BOWL
Date: 21 Dec 92 16:51:50 GMT
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <1992Dec18.202559.1@wharton.upenn.edu> reille85@wharton.upenn.edu writes:
>In article <1992Dec11.154231.10343@ntmtv>, jmartin@ntmtv.UUCP (Jeff Martin) writes:
>> 	Eagles played their Super Bowl on Oct 5. Hope you
>> 	enjoyed it.
>I hope the Eagles see the Cowboys in the playoffs,
>because no matter where it is, it will be a Dallas Cowboy bloodbath for
>terrified Troy and Jerk-Off Jimmy.

Gee, with intelligent, reasonable fans like this, how can you not root for
the Eagles?

dw
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gideon Avrahami)
Subject: Re: Wildcard Teams to the Super Bowl
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:51:10 GMT

HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.) writes:
>> The first wildcard team to make it to the Super Bowl were the 1969 Kansas
>> City Chiefs.  You can look it up.
>
>  Wasn't Dallas the first wild card to WIN a Superbowl ('72 or something)?

Here's the official wild-card story.  Read it and weep.  (Or laugh).
Data courtesy of wuarchive.wustl.edu:/pub/nfl/scores, your source for
free and mostly accurate NFL crunchables!

=====================================================================
Until 1967 only division champions went to the playoffs.  Actually,
until 1968 they just played a championship game.  In the 1967 season,
the NFL split into 4 divisions (four teams each) and added a round of
playoffs.  In 1968, the AFL added one wildcard team (2nd place with
better record), and in 1969 they had two (both 2nd places).

After the AFL/NFL merger, with a two-conference system of 3 divisions
each, they had one wildcard team in each conference.  Starting in 1975,
home advantage in the playoffs started to be awarded by record, instead
of by rotation.

In 1978, a second wildcard was added.  This introduced the concept of a 
bye week, which gave divisional champions an added advantage over wild
cards.

Starting in 1990, we have three wildcard teams, and only the top two
divisional champions get the off week.  In these two years, the teams
that didn't get the week off failed to make the championship games
(New Orleans lost right away, and the other three lost the following
week).

In the following list , a L means that the team lost its first game,
otherwise it's the playoff record.  The totals are: out of 75 wildcard
teams, 44 lost right away.  20 won one game, 8 won 2, one went 3-1,
one 3-0 and one 4-0.  Total record: 46-73.

1968	KC	L
1969	Hou	L
	KC	3-0, won SB	***
1970	Det	L
	Mia	L
1971	Wash	L
	Balt	L
1972	Dal	1-1
	Clev	L
1973	Wash	L
	Pitt	L
1974	Wash	L
	Buf	L
1975	Dal	2-1, lost SB	***
	Cin	L
1976	Wash	L
	NE	L
1977	Oak	1-1
	Chi	L
1978	Hou	2-1, lost championship game
	Mia	L
	Atl	1-1
	Phil	L
1979	Hou	2-1, lost championship game
	Den	L
	Phil	1-1
	Chi	L
1980	Oak	4-0, won SB	***
	Hou	L
	Dal	2-1, lost championship game
	LA	L
1981	Buf	1-1
	NYJ	L
	NYG	1-1
	Phil	L
1982	(strike year - 16 team tournament)
1983	Rams	1-1
	Dal	L
	Sea	2-1, lost championship game
	Den	L
1984	Sea	1-1
	Rdrs	L
	NYG	1-1
	Rams	L
1985	NE	3-1, lost SB	***
	NYJ	L
	NYG	1-1
	SF	L
1986	NYJ	1-1
	KC	L
	Wash	2-1, lost championship game
	Rams	L
1987	Hou	1-1
	Sea	L
	Minn	2-1, lost championship game
	NO	L
1988	Hou	1-1
	Clev	L
	Minn	1-1
	Rams	L
1989	Pitt	1-1
	Hou	L
	Rams	2-1, lost championship game
	Phil	L
1990	Wash	1-1
	Phil	L
	NO	L
	Mia	1-1
	KC	L
	Hou	L
1991	KC	1-1
	Rdrs	L
	NYJ	L
	Dal	1-1
	Chi	L
	Atl	1-1
=====================================================================


--Gidi
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: It wasn't Pretty (49ers WON)
Date: 22 Dec 1992 14:44:06 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

[deletion]
 >>Danny White was the top rated QB in the league in 86, SO WHAT !
 >>(until he broke his wrist)week 8
 >>
 >>There are lies, damn lies 
 >>and quarterback ratings......
 >
 >True, but putting it in Cowboy terms. Which would you rather have, Steve
 >Young, or Troy Aikman? I think most people, excluding Cowboy fans, would
 >chose Young. And not just because of statistics.
 >
 >Tom Wolf

Troy was a first round draft choice, was Young even drafted ?
Clearly most coaches would take Aikman also except SF maybe.
After last nights game ? compared with Saturdays niners game ?
Aikman hands down....

Troy Aikman will be a NFL QB long after Mr Young is history....
Scramblers don't have a long life in the NFL.

DALLAS COWBOYS
1992 NFC EAST CHAMPIONS

Ya gotta feel sorry for the eagles.....NOT!!!!!
Tim
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit)
Subject: Re: The Harris/Haley Trade
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:20:58 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M) writes:
>How has Haley done for the Cowboys?  Are you-all pleased with the trade?
>Did it work out as you expected/hoped?  Obviously, the Cowboys as a team
>have had a fine year.

I have seen a marked difference between the way the Cowboys attack 
QBs since the acquisition of Haley, although he hasn't had a lot of sacks.
The general opinion is that he has drawn "double-teaming" and thus has
freed up other defensive guys.  I'm happy !

			-Ron
From: steven@advtech.uswest.com (Steve Novak)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Reeves Fired
Date: 28 Dec 92 21:49:35 GMT
Reply-To: Steve Novak <steven@advtech.uswest.com>
Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies
Originator: steven@jaynes

KBCO radio in Denver has just announced that Coach Dan Reeves of the
Denver Broncos has been fired by owner Pat Bowlen.


-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Steve Novak |    |"Wacker the K"| 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
steven@advtech.USWest.Com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro