HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Typical dangerous dalligator crap.Shoot him now.
Date: 27 Jan 93 20:06:58 GMT
Organization: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine

In article <931325131357@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk> STUCS204@IBM3090.BHAM.AC.UK (Richard Thomas) writes:
> [I'm sure you don't want to read it all again anyway]

>You are the sort of person that women have abortions to avoid giving berth to.

Back during the war(1), while my Mum was in the Wrens (2), she often gave
berth to MTBs (3). I suppose it takes an IBM3090 to figure out how abortion
could have helped her avoid this.

(1) World War II
(2) WRNS - Women's Royal Naval Service
(3) Motor Torpedo Boat

-- 
                       Se non e` vero, e` ben trovato 
     ...{utzoo|mnetor}!dciem!dretor!king        king@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca
From: nikolov@idc.uucp (Slavtcho Nikolov)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: test
Date: 21 Jan 1993 16:13:44 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

test
test
Ignore
no reply
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Shut the fuck up, Moaner.
Date: 22 Jan 93 01:11:34 GMT
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <35618@olympus.wustl.edu> moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
|(Mr J S Graley), in a loser attempt to defend the blather of Michele, write:

Moaner, flaming you is an entertaining hobby for one and all. I have no desire
to defend Michelle. 

|>Start talking about statistical averages (if you know what
|>they are, and what they mean) and people may be interested.
|
|I only know that you are in the 99.99 *lower* percentile of the distribution
|of intelligence for human beings, ass-licker. Anyway you have good 
|company, around there!!

So how come I am more intelligent than you, dumb bitch?

|Moana.
|
|PS: don't refer to yourself as 'people', as we know that you are definitely
|far from belonging to this class.

I would not refer to myself as 'people' since 'people' is a plural form, and
there is only one of me.

~THE GREAT NAME

-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: phuar@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr T Moxey)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Sadness
Date: 25 Jan 1993 12:28:21 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: borage.csv.warwick.ac.uk


Something called Moana writes:

>Please, Mr Moxey, don't tell us crap. We all have an example of the
>level of understanding of the Brits. Just refer to ~the GREAT NAME 
>postings to get a better idea. Ah, and also your meaningful post
>confirm our theory.

Um, yeah, understand your logic there!

>  "We are intellingent, we are smart, we are the best ..."

You said that, not I.

>>So, just thought I'd post this, hope you don't cry too much. If you are ever in
>>England, then drop me a line, I'll meet you, then we'll really see how hard you
>>are.
>The perfect example of blather. First he spews wisdom about Michele
>and although the target is right, your flame is pathetic), and then he
>claims to be the macho-men number 2 of the network. What an asshole!

It was not an attempt to be a flame, but just an observation of what I had read.
I shall leave the "hardcore, we know the score" flaming to all of you that exist
for your terminal. I was not attempting to be the macho-mAn number 2 of the
network at all, in fact, entirely the opposite. I don't think that it is at all
macho to write garbage interspaced with obscenities. I was only trying to say
that if you ever got your big ass up off your chair in front of your terminal,
and came to meet me, then we'd see if you had the same attitude with the screen
as your defence gone. In your assuming that this is a macho thing points that you
think that women should not react this way, and therefore have no place in 'Mens
Life'. Surely thinking of that nature belongs in 'Not that I'm too sad' Michele's
warped mind, and not yours?

>Give us a break, and come back to your warwick institute for mental 
>diseases, swollen Brit! 

Um....explanation please, especially on the ...'and come back to your warwick
institute.....' bit, thanks.

don't get so stressed,

tim
From: king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: the Phantom strikes out
Date: 27 Jan 93 17:59:26 GMT
Distribution: alt
Organization: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine

In article <1993Jan24.234712.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>In article <H.eg.OZkshNrdjl2@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca>, jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca (John Henders) writes:
>> 	And as it probably went right over your head msg001, as it
>> contained no naughty words or schoolyard profanity, yes, that was a
>> flame. 
>
>You were able to muster ONE feeble sentence after deliberating over my reply
>for over 5 days?? 

Not everybody on the net has the luxury of a quick news feed. Count
yourself among the fortunate few. I see that you followed his 'one feeble
sentence' with six mundane, immaterial and irrelevant sentences of your own.

>Your pathetic attempt at rhetorical bait was more than a failure.

It would appear that Mr. Henders posting had the desired effect, ie to have
you further demonstrate your ignorance, and it is therefore not a failure.

> Not only have you revealed yoursef to an atrophic little twit, but

Did John reveal himself to you? Then, once again, count yourself among the
fortunate few.

>you've managed to instantly place yourself into the ranks of Graley and Walsh
>with your feeble attempt at a flame.

Hardly. Or, perhaps, in your eyes only, but then why should anyone give a
shit what you think? Congratulations, vsg001, you are putting yourself into
the same league as Witty, supreme pinhead. 

>Not to mention that you were able to be redundant within that very same, 
>solitary sentence. 

It is evident that you have a reading comprehension problem as well all
your other problems. Better luck next time.

>Bravo Monsieur, Such Spirited Words! Good bye, my little 
>ItalianInCanadianClothing... 

????? Where did you get this from????? It makes no sense at all, although
that's not surprising, considering the source.

>--The Phantom

-- 
                       Se non e` vero, e` ben trovato 
     ...{utzoo|mnetor}!dciem!dretor!king        king@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: haushalt@research.nj.nec.com (Robert C.Haushalter)
Subject: Re: Phantom Exposed: His real name is Vinson Scott Goddard!
Originator: haushalt@shakti
Organization: NEC Research Institute
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 13:58:31 GMT

In article <36014@olympus.wustl.edu> moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
>(Mr J S Graley) writes:
>>|Please redirect all responses from now on to "Vinnie" instead of phantom.
>
>Where's the problem? Vinnie is such a nice and sweet name ...
>
>Vinnie: don't be pissed off: you have always your sweet friend Moana
>in case you're upset!
>
>Tenderly. Moana.
>

Moana: the reason "vinnie" sounds sweet to you is that it probably
reminds you of a bottle of cheap italian wine.  But in english it
means "scabby prick".  Bob


-- 
The opinions are mine..not my company's.
Actually, everything is more complicated
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Intellectuals & women
Date: 24 Jan 93 01:49:19 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan23.213047.6154@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:

> Why did I delete that???   Because Italy's population growth has exactly
> zero bearing on whether I think you are a cretinous pus-wad.  I don't
> care about Italy's population growth!!! 

You don't care about any fuck, you are an hypocrite, you 
care only about your unfucking actress, you are a son of a 
bitch, that's why you hate mothers. 

And now, I am sure that you hate the fact that you are born. 

And I tell you: you are right for that.

Fuck you.

	Michele
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: disclaimer
Date: 22 Jan 93 14:50:36 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1993Jan21.164000.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
> In article <35672@olympus.wustl.edu>, moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombard
 
[stuff deleted]

> lames. Senza esclusione di colpi, fino all'ultimo sangue.

We don't care for your stupid Itallian flames asshole. Are you using
the second language to avoid more flames against your moronic points?
Try this one(since you seem to enjoy mutilple languages); 
Dein Mutti war ein Horrer (Your mother was a Whore.) 

>>    ... And we were taught that diamond is the hardest material in the 
>>    world ...
> 
> False. You well know that italian cocks are the hardest material 
> in the world.

Ha! Because your used to sucking them, Pink boy! 

[more stuff deleted]
>                     
> Pathetic.
> 
> 	Michele

We know you are.
I'm not flaming you in Moana's defence, Everyone just hates you!

JEFF WITTY
ARMY R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY
From: moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Truth about scandinavian men and italian women
Date: 23 Jan 93 20:58:14 GMT
Organization: Washington University,  St Louis MO

In article <35598@olympus.wustl.edu> moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
>dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>>P.S.	And now let me work, that I have a family to pay for...
>>	(you know what it means in italian, right Moana?)
>
>Yes, I know. How many toilets did you clean for your wife's new furcoat 
>(christmas present)? It was very expensive (because of the wideness)?
>
>Moana.


OK, OK, I APOLOGIZE for what I've written. I didn't mean it.

As I've explained to somebody in private e-mail, my sentence was ironic
and was trying to hit Michele's simplicistic ideas of life (beautiful
women, here on the earth just to be f***ed, and so on)...
... well, I realize that I didn't succeed in this: I'm SORRY.

Moana.

PS: follows up to alt.non-sequitur.
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: 26 Jan 1993 18:08:57 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk
Keywords: Once bitten, forever smitten.

In article <C1G47z.2w4@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
|(Mr J S Graley) writes:
|>(Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
|>|Tsk, tsk, tsk.  Freudian lesson #1:  one sees in others what one 
|>|hides in oneself.
|>|
|>If you use simple logic, you will realise that if one sees in others what one
|>hides in oneself, then one can never make observations about other people, and
|>the entirity of psychology would be null. But I guess you didn't, did you?
|
|You are describing "projection", a common ego-defense mechanism used 
|to cope with stress.  It is a reaction in which we blame others for our 
|mistakes and shortcomings, or attribute to others our own own unacceptable 
|motivations.  You should be _quite_ familiar with it, Mr. Graley.
|
|Since this is an _extremely_ basic concept in psychology, your statement 
|"that if one sees...  [projects]  ...what one hides in oneself... then one
|can never make observations about other people, and the entirity [sic] of 
|psychology would be null"  is a non sequitur.
|
|>But as your posting shows, women have no sense of logic.
|
|In other words, you are *PROJECTING* your own illogical thinking into
|my fiancee, Katherine.
|
|I hated to do this to you, since you are showing great self-control by
|posting in mixed case and haven't used a single "FUCK",  but I *did*
|warn you about messing with my sweetie.
|
|-- Andy

But Kathy also sad, in a deleted part of the posting, that she does not agree
with freud anyway. 

Thus your entire posting is a waste of bandwidth.

~THE GREAT NAME
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: why?
Date: 23 Jan 93 14:12:59 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <35742@olympus.wustl.edu>, moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
> Just a silly question from a newbie.

All your questions are silly.
> 
> Why Michele seems to be so frightened by the guy who calls himself 
> 'the phantom'?

Frightened? What does it mean? It doesn't belong to my 
dictionary...
> 
> Let me explain a little better. I don't know why but I have the strong
> feeling that this 'phantom' has painfully kicked the ass of Michele in the 
> remote past. Am I right? 

YOU ARE WRONG! Little ghost is a poor spirit, is hanging 
around this sad world, looking for the door that will bring 
him to a new life. 
> 
> If not I cannot explain to myself the incredibly weak replies of Michele
> to the posts of 'the phantom': 

I am a man with values. I already won against the little ghost, I 
respect the losers.

> although clueless, at least the usual
> Michele's replies are much more hot....

Are you trying to be forgiven for something, baby? You are so 
sweet with me on this days....
> 
> Regards. Moana.

	  Michele

P.S.	No P.P.S, today? Hey, you are learning!
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@gold.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Hamper: Spaghetti-O's!!!!
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:08:56 GMT

In article <CANNAM.93Jan27111846@borodin.sc.ZIB-Berlin.de> Cannam@sc.ZIB-Berlin.de (Chris Cannam) writes:
>
>In article <C1HE13.1wG@cs.psu.edu>
>krobinso@redviolet.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>
>   Hello?
>
>   K e n   R o b i n s o n
>
>
>Oh, praise the Lord I'm sure.

You have made an error, for I am not the Lord, I am k e N.

k e N   R o B i N s o N
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: an7898@anon.penet.fi
Subject: brits offer hardness check
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: alt.flame
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:19:47 GMT

X-anon-to: alt.flame

Whinging pommy bastard phuar@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr T Moxey) whines:

>You want to be hard, go to South Central LA, let's see how long you'd last.

I could probably last for no more than three orgasms in an hour.

>If you are ever in England, then drop me a line, I'll meet you, then we'll
>really see how hard you are.

I got a big fat woodie just thinking about it Tim.  Your offer sure sounds
tempting but if I go all the way to England I would hope for a little better
action than just a hardness check.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:41:48 GMT
Subject: Re: What a *Macho* really is...
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: alt.flame

Hey you dago Michele, 

What the *hell* do you talk of? What do you know of the *Macho* mens,
anyway?  Puah! You are a *moron*.

>I see that there is a lot of confusion about the meaning of
>Macho. But, since I am a nice guy, I will explain what a
>Macho is for your pleasure:

Please *moron* from Sicily, don't bother. ARGGGGGHHHHHH! Puah!

Hahahahahahahahahaha! You don't have a dick to show my Moana what
is this *Macho* is, belive me.  

>A macho is romantic.
Only to men are you romantic, *shithead moron*, so *that*

>A macho *respects* women because he respects a lot his
>mother.

You mean, you have had the sex with your *mother*??? You are *more*
stupid moron that I think.

>A macho likes when his lady does things for him.

Yes, like going to the store to buy beer for him. And bend over.
And get the newspaper. 

>A macho likes to joke about sex, because it is funny.

Yes, and *morons* like you also hold the womens head unders the
bed covers after the *big fart* because it is funny.

>A macho can get easily angry.

Is this why you have put the womens in hospital for the *bad* hitting?
How macho of you to do this, Puah!?!?!?

> Did I forget something, Moana?

Yes, you forgot to tell her to get you a *beer*!

>Yes, I am macho, so?

So *that*! Bwahahahahahahaha! You *moron* you are a slut.

Go back to the Sicily, little frou-frou *shithead*. Stay *far*
from here!
From: martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: FINALLY! Vinson Scott Goddard! THE NEXT MICHELE (tm) (c)
Date: 27 Jan 93 04:40:52 GMT
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA


[THOUGHT PROVOKING AND ESSENTIAL MartinFLAMES (tm) (c) DELETED]

Mr. Martin J. Hannigan types...

>|Well, actually, I busted the phantom a few days ago. When I sent him email
>|about it he responded that I would be violating net.etiquette so I didn't
>|out him (tm) (c).
>|

Jisbo Graley enters...

>Yeh, he mailed me last year with the same stuff, due to a misuderstanding - 
>i.e. I wasn't even going to try and discover his name anyway. Talk about
>paranoia. 
>
>But I figure it this way. When did Vinson ever refer to anyone _else_ by 
>_their_ chosen pseudonym? Never... I think the word is 'hypocritical'. No
>wonder him and KMM get on so well.
>
>|Out Him (tm) (c) 1993 All RIghts Reserved -  = Martin Hannigan =
>
>~THE GREAT NAME      <--- take note, Vinnie

Oh fuck, he's a thief too? I must create a macro to copyright all my
coined phrases. This is out of control. At least Vinnie could be original
seeing that he is using that phantom shit. My sysadmin told me he was
playing net.cop too. God bless you Vinnie Scotty Goddard!!


~THE BETTER NAME



-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Martin Hannigan, N.C.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.newbie
From: maxwell@deep-13.gizmo.com
Subject: Re: YOU FUCKERS
Followup-To: alt.flame,alt.newbie,alt.drugs
Organization: Gizmonics Institute Inc.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 19:26:19 GMT
X-Posted-From: vango.fnal.gov
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <28JAN199310173271@rosie.uh.edu>, st1pk@rosie.uh.edu (Lord of Newbies) writes:
> In article <1993Jan28.035421.1@deep-13.gizmo.com>, maxwell@deep-13.gizmo.com writes...
>>X-Sender: usenet@nmsu.edu
>>X-Organization: New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
>>X-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 05:21:49 GMT
>>Lines: 15
>> 
>>I am getting sick of hearing all you druggies encouring kids to use
>>drugs.
[bullshit deleted]
 
> 	Your absolutely right! In fact, we will start with you.
> You would have to be on drugs to write someting like that to alt.newbie.
>


grrrr. 
I didn't write it, I *crossposted* it.  Seems that crosspost doesn't 
preserve the original author's name. 

win-some-lose-some.max

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Subject: Re: Somethin' fishy ...
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 02:30:12 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX
Keywords: Andy the hard-working contributor to society elocutes

(JORN GUNNAR HALONEN) writes in regards to his A4000:
>Nope, RANDY-ANDY. I honestly made my own money this summer to buy it.
>You shouldn't whine because you have an inferior machine, you know.
>Jealousy hurts no one but yourself. In USA the price of the A4000
>(less than $2700) is almost half of what we must pay over here. There's
>really nothing to it but buying the damn thing.

Nothing to it if you've no rent payments to make, groceries to buy, 
utilities to pay, social life to pay for.  In short, nothing to it if
you're a college dweeb living off mummy and daddy's largesse.

[ lamely defending his .sig, JORN continues his prattle: ]
>You're much stupider than I thought, Andy. Do you really think that
>anyone else cares about your .sig whining ? This discussion of ours
>probably bores the shit out of others. Maybe I'll just use the .sig
>when I reply to your postings.

Now, see here JORN, I wasn't going to bring up the subject unless you did.      
No I doubt if anyone else cares about my lambasting you about your .sig.
I'll bet dollars to doughnuts they care even less about your imbecilic
.sig.

Speaking of which...

[ JORN's over-compensating for his lack of masculinity sig deleted ]

-- Andy
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 16:26:16 GMT
Subject: Re: Michele never existed. You fell for it
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: alt.flame

I take it all back now.... Michele does exist....

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha....

You fell for it again.  ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Come on Jim, everyone else can keep up with what's going on...




Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 08:59:40 GMT

In article <rcl3ks-@rpi.edu>, cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:

> It never ceases to amaze me how people can sit and type a long explanation
> of why they don't have the time to actually type a couple of sentences that
> would have proven their point anyway.

Equally amazing are people who only sit on their ass, impling to all that only
*they* are unique in their flames. You speak of brevity... why don't you make
it easier on all of us and not write at all? You obviously have never brought
out any intelligent posting of your own, ever, so why should we have to put up
with your own creative deficientcies? You once were an excellent example of
someone who is lethargic. Now you are annoying. But still, mind you, worth
replying to as you will hopefully discourage others from being such a lazy ass.
 
> Could it be....the gun is cocked, but the chamber is empty?

Could it be Cocker, that you could never even load the gun?

--The Phantom
From: alwalsh@unix1.tcd.ie (Andreas Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Keywords: Only 20 shopping days left till Valentine's Day.
Date: 27 Jan 93 16:37:36 GMT
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin

>If I saw a member of the IRA, and I had a gun, yeh, I'd kill the bastard. 
> There and then
>and with good reason.

In what you've said you've just shown you know dick shit about
anything real.

The troubles are fucking real and not anything to do with comic
books. So leave the serious shit out alright: do macho alright ,
individuals perfect, (go on flame me for not seein' you're
irony) but Jesus, some have us have to live this shit!!!!  

>~THE GREAT NAME
>-- 
>    Don't worry,
>     Its like in the comic books...
>      ITS NOT REAL!

Andreas

PS Please note mail address

--
"You need the dark to see the stars."
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Beer, me Mason!
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:26:47 GMT

In article <1k1a9oINNa9q@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:

> TRANSLATION:
> 
> Ooh Phantom, your posts defending me were so brave, youre such a macho man, I
> want you to come to california and fuck me. I haven't got worms living up
> my cunt really - thats just a cruel rumour spread by the insect destruction
> department. Plllleeeeeeesese pleee.. oops I just wet my pants.

YOU ARE SUCH A MORON! You "flame" me for a "translation" of something already
in English... you then try a "copy cat" flame! THINK FOR YOURSELF YOU CRETIN!
Oh! Wait! Perhaps that is my problem... YOU CAN'T THINK! California!?!
California!?! Try CANADA you stupid fuck! 

Graley: "But... but... but... they start with TWO of the same letters!! I can't
be blamed!! You are just a lame!! You FUCKING FUCKED FUCK OF A FUCKING FUCK!"

Has it penetrated your thick skull that you are about as pathetic as they come?

--The Phantom
Newsgroups: alt.flame