HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: karu@nevada.edu (NARANAPITI KARUNARATNE)
Subject: Re: LVPCUG OS/2 SIG Meeting
Organization: University of Nevada System Computing Services
Distribution: comp.os.os2.misc
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 13:08:56 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.033042.29051@csus.edu> sangercd@nextnet.csus.edu (Carl D. Sanger) writes:
>In article <1992Dec11.163044.12934@nevada.edu> karu@nevada.edu (NARANAPITI KARUNARATNE) writes:
>>Las Vegas PC Users' Group's OS/2 SIG meets third Thursday of
>>every month.  This is now the second largest SIG of the
>>LVPCUG which has over 750 members.
>>
>Just curious, what's the largest SIG of the LVPCUG?
>
>
>-- 
>Carl Sanger				|| sangercd@csus.edu
>California State University, Sacramento

Windows SIG which has been in existence for some time whereas the 
OS/2 SIG became the second largest right behind it within just
four months. I expect us to be the largest very soon.
BTW, the president of the Windows SIG has joined our group and
left the Windows SIG.
Karu.

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rhd@chinet.chi.il.us (Rich Derr)
Subject: Re: new ATI Ultra drivers
Summary: They work?! 
Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 07:00:29 GMT

I tried installing the thing.  It went OK, but when I rebooted, my
screen showed a repeated pattern of coloured vertical lines.  But
OS/2 was actually running underneath!  Being unable to see the screen
I was dead trying to do anything, so I had to boot off the install
disk to copy the backup config.sys.  I did this three times:  I tried
all three resolutions.  Same thing in each case, except that the
monitor always went to the chosen resolution.

I guess if they offer nothing I shouldn't be too interested, but,
how does your setup differ?  I have a 486-50, 16M, 510M (32M FAT
Primary; 330M FAT Logical; 50M HPFS Bootable Logical; 100M HPFS
Logical), ATI Graphics Ultra.

(When I rebooted OS/2 in VGA I tried Seamless Windows for the first
time.  It's nice!  Why can't IBM write seamless 8514/A drivers?)

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jst50986@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jack S. Tan)
Subject: Re: What is the recommended size for an OS/2 system-only partition?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 20:41:53 GMT
Keywords: os2 waffle 165

pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (Jeremy Mathers) writes:

> I want to partition my 200M disk as efficiently as possible, leaving
> just enuf room on C: to hold the OS/2 system.  What is the magic number?
> I just ordered the DAP CD ROM, so I think I am about to re-install again.
> 
> (In the most recent install [straight GA], we set it to 60 [with 140 as D:],
> and after installing and running for awhile, there is still 28M
> free on C:  This is now essentially wasted space...)

I have a 45MB partition for the OS/2 system files; this allows for Win 3.1
support, plus fonts and other stuff; it seems kind of large right now,
though (I haven't added any fonts or anything yet).  The swapfile is sitting
in a data partition (150MB), so it has ample room to grow.  I have an 8MB
OS/2 boot partition for doing CHKDSK and the like.  It also contains useful
apps from ftp-os2, so they're available in case the system partition or data
partition goes down.  (There is also an MS-DOS partition, but that is not of
interest here.)

-- 

Jack Tan                                     Sattinger's Law:
jahk@uiuc.edu                       It works better if you plug it in.

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: iam@stiatl.salestech.com (Ian Mercado)
Subject: Re: Farenheit 1280 Drivers..FINALLY!
Organization: Sales Technologies, Inc.
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 01:21:36 GMT

ghenniga@NMSU.Edu writes:
>	I sent their CIS ID a note, mentioning the above gripe and bug, but
>it takes, in my experience, a couple of days to get a response.

I think for every bug we mention, we should at least thank the programmer (s?)
twice for even getting these drivers done for us.  They work great for me...
the only bug I've noticed so far is when a dos window changes from 25 to 50
line mode and vice versa, the video screen goes all out of whack.  Simply
full-screening then windowing the window again solved this problem.
Oh, and 70MHz at 1024x768 works just great for me!  (And fast, too!)

>>The docs seem to indicate that Orchid's efforts
>>were those of a single programmer. (?)  What an
>>extravagance on their part!
>>
>>But I'm not really complaining...

He's probably the only guy they've got that is capable of doing QUALITY 
programming for the F1280.  

>	Even so I am extremely happy that at least they have someone
>working on them!

Me, too.  I think he's done a wonderful job on them for just the second
release.  The only things that I can see that need touching up are the above
mentioned problem and some palette management (I guess that would require
32 bit drivers).  Let's just be glad we don't own ATI cards!!

Ian

-- 
The system?  33MHz80486with64Kcache16MBof70ns |  Ian Mercado: iam@salestech.com
4x9SIMMS1MBTseng4000videoboard200MB15msIDE     --------------------------------
harddriveCOM1:COM2:LPT1:onstandardportsandinterrupts |   I am NOT a signature
"But it was too slow, so I re-wired it..."           | virus.  Copy me and die!
Lines: 29
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 17:05:25 MST
From: ecktons@sirius.byu.edu (Sean Eckton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Installing Linux on an OS/2 system, using Boot Manager
Reply-To: ecktons@sirius.byu.edu (Sean Eckton)

In article <1992Dec15.164921.24146@olymp.informatik.uni-bonn.de>  
greve@rs1.thch.uni-bonn.de (Thomas Greve) writes:
> In article <1992Dec11.192003.10358@ultb.isc.rit.edu> djs6015@ultb.rit.edu  
(Don Smith) writes:
> >
> >Hi There...
> >
> >Does anyone have any info that can help me make my Linux Partition
> >bootable from the Boot Manager? When I try to boot it from the Boot
> >Manager it says that its not a formatted drive... help!
> Linux comes with it's own boot manager, but i don't have any
> experience with it, yet.

Get the utility LILO and it will create the boot information on your Linux  
partition.  That should make the boot manager recognize the partition as  
bootable.  You might also have to set certain flags in FDISK (OS/2 FDISK) to  
make it work, but I can't remember because it has been too long since I've  
done it and I not longer have LINUX on my machine because my OS/2 partition  
was full and I needed 60 more meg.  The documentation for LILO isn't very  
clear, but there is a file you have to edit to specify the partition to  
install the boot sector on.  BE CAREFUL!

--
Sean Eckton

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Internet:  ecktons@sirius.byu.edu      Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
Packet Radio:  kd6bik @ wb7esh.#orem.ut.usa.na
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: bash@tware.com (Paul Bash)
Subject: Re: NEC Intersect Model CDR-74 and OS/2 2.0--yes or no?
Organization: Techware Design, Boulder, Colorado
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 21:05:02 GMT

In article <78396@hydra.gatech.EDU> ccusekh@prism.gatech.EDU (Kevin Hodge) writes:
>We have a Gateway2000 486DX2/50 EISA with an Adaptec 1742 32-bit
>SCSI controller (running in enhanced mode).  I have access to a 
>NEC Intersect Model CDR-74 CD-ROM player.  Before I hook it up I
>wanted to check and see if anyone has any experiences with such
>a setup.  Will it work under OS/2 2.0?  In particular, I want to
>use it with the PDK.  Thanks in advance.
> 

I have the CDR-74 running under OS/2 2.0 (+SP) with an Adaptec 
1542B using the recently released SCSI CDROM drivers (which you can
get from hobbes via anonymous FTP. Look for os2cdrom.zip). It works
fine. Actually, it works better than fine! The CDR-74 is a hot
drive!
-- 
Paul Bash                                                   Techware Design 
bash@tware.com                                              Boulder, CO  U.S.A.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: 880506s@dragon.acadiau.ca (James R. Skinner)
Subject: Re: new ATI Ultra drivers
Organization: Acadia University
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 19:23:21 GMT

gt0297a@prism.gatech.EDU (Tim Drury) writes:

>In <BzCznu.6B8@world.std.com> bsn@world.std.com (Brent S Noorda) writes:

>>I installed the recent ATI Ultra that I had taken from the OS/2
>>Shareware BBS, which claimed to have just got it from ATI.  I assume
>>this is the same.  This is for OS/2 2.0 GA release.  You first
>>setup OS/2 for VGA, not 8514, and then run a short install program
>>that installs drivers and alters config.sys, also allowing you to
>>select resolutions up to 1024x768.  I chose 1024x768 because it allows
>>me to get even tinier text than the 8514 mode.  So now there is a little
>>more room on my desktop.  It doesn't seem to be any faster or better in

>how is that?  8514 is 1024x768x256.  how is your text smaller with the
>same resolution?

This is becasue it displays VGA icons rather than 8514/a ones...

>>I installed the ATI driver because I though it would give me
>>seamless windows.  It didn't.  If it should have, then someone please
>>let me know.  My full-screen win/os-2 drivers had to be reset again
>>for 8514 because after the ATI install it had been set to VGA.

>8514 under GA will give you seamless windoz, after the service pack,
>however, that went away.

Wrong!  8514 has never been seamless (yet..)


-- 

-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
        James Robie Skinner        |     Jodrey School of Computer Science        James.Skinner@dragon.acadiau.ca  |  Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada
-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: adhir@wam.umd.edu (Al Dhir)
Subject: DCF/2...
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 06:41:38 GMT

I am curious about DCF/2 for OS/2.  I DLed the dcf2show file from hobbes
and watched the show, but it left me with a few unanswered questions.
Will I be able to see a DCF2 drive from within native DOS?  Or will I
be stuck only being able to see it from OS/2?  What kind of a performance
hit can I expect on my system when using this product (I have a 486/50)?
I am assuming that the swapfile must remain on a non-dcf2 partition, is
this correct?  Finally, does DCF/2 add additional logical drives to the
system (I am already up to G, I don't want to have to refer to my drives
as H-N...it would be too wierd).  As I understand it, this is how Stacker 
does its thing.

Thanks for the answers...I am looking forward to doubling my storage!

-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Al Dhir                      			   Technical Consulting Staff
 Internet: adhir@cygnus.umd.edu	  	 University of Maryland, College Park
 Bitnet:   adhir%cygnus.umd.edu@Interbit      (301) 405-1500 * (301) 405-3014
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: charlie@elektro.cmhnet.org (Charlie Smith)
Subject: Re: How to increase speed of communications in OS/2 2.0
Keywords: os2 waffle 165
Organization: Why do you suspect that?
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 92 01:48:32 GMT

In article <8149@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
>In article <brown.198.724388877@chinchilla.ir.ucf.edu> brown@chinchilla.ir.ucf.edu (Bill Brown) writes:
>>This is probably your problem.  Although the 16550AN has a FIFO buffer (a 16 
>>byte queue to prevent character overrun under high speed serial rates), it's 
>>completely broke.  The 16550AFN is the fixed version of this chip.
>
>Sorry. The 16550 (non-A, non-AF) was the broken one. (The N is National
>Semiconductor's package designator for a plastic DIP.) The 16550A fixed the
>FIFO so that it works. I'm using two of them continuously under heavy loading,
>and the FIFOs work fine. The AF fixed an obscure bug, but the info I have is
>that there's no practical difference in normal use.  
>

I've got a whole bag full of PC16550CN chips ... where do these fit in the
scheme?


Charlie Smith   charlie@elektro.cmhnet.org  csmith@dsac.dla.mil  whois ces10
  Eves:  614-471-1418    Days:  614-692-9064    FAX:  614-692-8217
   elektro.uucp  TB WorldBlazer  614-471-9416  for anonymous uucp
                      Columbus Ohio   USA


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: How to re-install WIN OS/2 ?
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 21:46:01 GMT

In article <1992Dec10.193553.20547@midway.uchicago.edu> pynq@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>As of today, my seamless Windows applications no longer work.  When I
>click on them, there is a slight pause, then nothing.  Worse, when I
>shutdown, it tells me that the app exists and that I should close it
>down or risk losing data (even though it does *not* show up in the
>Window list).
>I am thinking it may be time to re-install, or at least re-install the
>WIN OS/2 component.  It is possible to do this?

Sure.  OS/2 System -> System Setup -> Selective Install let's you
perform this magic.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
From: kitchin@lf.hp.com (Bruce Kitchin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Which Tape Drive for OS/2?
Date: 14 Dec 1992 22:30:43 GMT
Organization: Hewlett Packard Santa Clara Site
NNTP-Posting-Host: eden.avo.hp.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.2 PL7]

MCCONNELL (gt0554c@prism.gatech.EDU) wrote:
: 
: I am looking to get a tape drive to back up my hard drive under OS/2.
: Does anyone recommend one? I want to make sure the proper drivers
: are available before I buy. What software do I want to use?
: 
I use an HP 120MB tape controlled through the floppy drive.  It is really
an Irwin drive.  I have Irwin's Eztape for PM.  It supports various
other tape drives with different controllers.  I'm very pleased with
Eztape for PM.  You would probably want to checkout your options on
which hardware to choose among those supported by it.  There is probably
a major price/performance tradeoff.  My 120MB drive is rather out-dated.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (Jeremy Mathers)
Subject: Re: Niggling little problems
Reply-To: pynq@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: D. J. Dougherty & Associates
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 16:08:34 GMT

In article <1992Dec8.052602.17240@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
...
>
>I also hope someone knows of a supplier for an IDE adapter with
>16550AFN UARTs for the serial ports.  (If anyone knows of a supplier,
>please post and I'll add it to the FAQ List.)
>
>I do know of plenty selling plain multi-I/O adapters (without IDE)
>with 16550AFN UARTs (e.g. JDR Microdevices).

TSD Systems [(407) 331-9130] makes a nice board, called the AT I/O card
w/IDE Controller, for $32.95.  It includes 2 serials, 1 parallel, Game I/O,
floppy controller, and IDE controller.  The basic board includes 2 82450s
on the serial ports, but for $12.95 more, they will replace one with a
16550AFN.  I got one with 1 16550AFN; the total was $45.95.
I can't remember off hand whether or not both of the UARTs are socketed.
(This affects whether or not you can have both of them replaced with 16550s)

I have been very happy with it.  I am currently running OS/2 with it; it
runs my floppies, my tape backup, my hard disk, my printer, and my mouse.
(The above prices are as of 10/17/91; your mileage may vary)

************************************************************************
La plus belle fille du monde ne peut
donner que tout ce qu'elle a.

	- pynq@quads.uchicago.edu, who is still costing the net
	  hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars, every time he posts -
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: db3l@ans.net (David Bolen)
Subject: Fax Software & Modem
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 14:14:10 GMT
Organization: Advanced Network & Services, Inc. - Elmsford, NY

I'm looking for information about fax modems and software for OS/2
2.0.  From the many posts in these groups, it would seem that PM Fax
(does it have a new name now?) is considered one of the top, if not
the top, fax software packages currently.  Could anyone supply me with
an address and/or phone number for ordering?  (Oh yeah, some price
info would probably be nice too :-))

On the modem side - does anyone have recommendations for a good fax
modem?  If it's internal it would have to be microchannel, as it would
be going into a PS/2.  If external, I'd probably prefer a full V.32bis
modem if they exist, since the PS/2 currently has a single COM port
and the fax modem would be displacing an existing USR V.32bis modem.

Any information would be appreciated.  I'm a bit behind on this news
group, so I'd prefer that people mail any responses directly to me
(db3l@ans.net).  Thanks.

--
-- David
--
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------\
 \              David Bolen             \  Internet: db3l@ans.net      /
  |   Advanced Network & Services, Inc.   \   Phone: (914) 789-5327   |
 / 100 Clearbrook Road, Elmsford, NY 10523  \   Fax: (914) 789-5310    \
\-----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: mullins@convex.com (Don Mullins)
Subject: Re: DISKCACHE vs IFS CACHE
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 22:38:53 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In comp.os.os2.misc hankedr@mail.auburn.edu (Darrel Hankerson) writes:

>This has been discussed a few times in the past, but little mention has been
>made of the incorrect on-line docs.  As I understand the situation (confirmed
>by posts to this group), the on-line docs concerning "DISKCACHE for HPFS"
>are wrong.  DISKCACHE is for FAT,  CACHE is for HPFS.

  So, should I REM out the DISKCACHE line in config.sys if I am only running
  HPFS disks?  Maybe just setting DISKCACHE=0 ...
  
  Could doing this free up some real memory now being used for this not used
  often cache on a HPFS-only system? Could this have an adverse effect on
  floppy (FAT) accesses?

Just a thought,
Don

--
---                     Don Mullins, mullins@convex.com
----                      Convex Computer Corporation
---                         Richardson, Texas (USA)
--
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: olavt@ulrik.uio.no (Olav Torvund)
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.1? (Why it may cost) READ THIS!!
Organization: University of Oslo, Norway
	<OLAVT.92Dec14003146@ulrik.uio.no>
	<1992Dec14.175627.4452@unixland.natick.ma.us>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 00:27:34 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.175627.4452@unixland.natick.ma.us> bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser) writes:

   olavt@ulrik.uio.no (Olav Torvund) writes:
   >future make Windows support an option. Past 1993 I will probably not
   >need Windows support anymore, so why pay MS for it? Making Win support
   >an option from let us say OS/2 2.2 or 3.0 can also boost the
   >development of OS/2 applications, assuming that OS/2 will have a well
   >established critical user base by then.

   Do you really think this will be the case?  I wonder if most people
   will either stick with DOS, or DOS+Win3.1, until WinNT comes out?
   Jumping to OS/2 in between, while an interesting diversion for 
   us techie types, may not be interesting to the average user.


I think that OS/2 2.0 already have a critical mass of users - 2 mill
sold the first 8 months is not that bad. (And now it even starts to
get good press!). ANyway, if OS/2 does not have a well established
user base and a well established base of applications by the end of
1993, then it will have failed anyway.

And I do not think that many users are really waiting for NT. They are
curious, but that does not mean that they will buy it. And for us OS/2
users, OS/2 is definitly not an in-between OS on our way to NT.

Olav Torvund
University of Oslo
Norway
Olavt@jus.uio.no





Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: buhr@umanitoba.ca (Kevin Andrew Buhr)
Subject: Re: Service Pack and Welcome Folder
Organization: University of Manitoba, Canada
Distribution: comp.os.os2.misc
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 18:30:09 GMT

In article <92Dec19.190252.17540@acs.ucalgary.ca>
cedint9@acs.ucalgary.ca (cedint9) writes:
:
:  The Service Pak README file indicates that there should exist a
:  "Welcome" folder on my desktop.  It says that that is the place
:  where I can switch video resolution modes etc.

The SP "README" mentions the Welcome folder in two places.  In the
first one, it makes it clear that this folder is *ONLY* available on
IBM computers with OS/2 preinstalled.  The second time this folder is
mentioned, however, this isn't made clear.

:  Anyone know why, or what I can do otherwise to change resolution?

Instead, go to "System-> System Setup-> Selective Install", and change
your video adapter to "Super VGA".  If it's already "Super VGA", select
the "Primary Video Adapter" check box anyway, and *reselect* "Super
VGA.  

You'll be prompted to insert all the diskettes from number 6 to 15
from the *original* OS/2 distribution: a few fonts will be installed.
Then, you'll be asked to select the desired resolution.  Finally,
you'll have to insert the two Service Pack Display Driver diskettes.
At this point, you *do not* have to reinstall the Service Pack.  If
you do any *other* selective install, however (including new printer
drivers), you must reinstall the Service Pack.

Good luck!

Kevin <buhr@ccu.UManitoba.CA>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: amah@IASTATE.EDU ()
Subject: Which one is better, ATI Ultra 8514 or Diamond Stealth ? 
Reply-To: amah@IASTATE.EDU ()
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 04:09:57 GMT


Hi!

Which of the above two is better (compatibility and perormance)? Are there High
Resolution, 256 Color drivers available for any of them?

Thanks!



Max.
amah@iastate.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: tommy@lynx.msc.cornell.edu.UUCP (Mike Thompson,332,54714,2734927)
Subject: Re: CDROM and SCSI info wanted
Originator: tommy@snoopy.msc.cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell-Materials-Science-Center
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:02:17 GMT

From article <168BDE3E2.BOB@ysub.ysu.edu>, by BOB@ysub.ysu.edu (Bob Quigley):
> I am thinking of installing a TRANTOR T228 SCSI adapter, a Toshiba XM3301
> CDROM drive (the CD Porta-Drive from CD Technology) and an internal SCSI
> hard disk in my IBM PS/2 Model P70 portable. What I need to know is if the
> TRANTOR T228 with the Toshiba XM3301 is supported by OS/2? I would buy the
> complete adapter-CDROM drive set from CD Technology (this came as a promotion
> with the November PDK) but the TRANTOR is a short card that won't use
> up the only full slot available in the P70.

I just purchased the whole system from CD Technology.  The SCSI-2 board
they sell is a short card and will fit in any slot.  

My only objection is that they completely ignore OS/2 in the information
sent with the drive.  I would assume that since they are selling it from
an OS/2 promotion, they would at least have the courtesy to acknowledge
OS/2's existence.  Lot's of Windows promotions, but nothing else.  COME ON!

----
  ____ ___   ___    ___        Michael O. Thompson
   /  /  / / / /  / / / \ /    Materials Science & Engineering
  /  /__/ / / /  / / /  /      329 Bard Hall -- Cornell University
                               Ithaca, NY  14853
tommy@msc.cornell.edu          Ph: (607) 255-4714

OS/2:  For the few, the proud, the devoted!
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc