Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
From: rdale@cstp.umkc.edu
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 04:58:18 GMT
Organization: UM - Kansas City, Computer Science

>  ago is a pathetic attempt to divert the American people from the
>  worst economic record in 50 years.  It is a sign of pure

	Worst in 50 years?  I wonder about that.  Current unemployment
is 7.5%.  It was 7.3% under Carter, and reached 8.2% under Reagan.
Carter presided over double-digit inflation and interest rates reaching
almost 20%.  Inflation is now at 3.2% (or 2.9%, depending on who you
listen to).  Clinton says that more people are working longer hours
for less pay now than ever before.  Not according to the Bureau of
Labor Statistics.  People are working fewer hours, and their pay
has risen 3%, after a decline of 1.3% under Carter.

	The worst in 50 years?  I wish they'd show some figures to
back this statement up. . .

>  *    The American people don't want to hear about Bill Clinton's 1969
>  itinerary, they want to hear about the course America is going to

	No, they want Slick Willie to COME CLEAN about it.

>  take.  Bill Clinton has a plan to create millions of new jobs,

	So did Bush.  Government jobs don't add to the economy, they
take from it.

>  traveled to Moscow on their own or in small groups.  There were no
>  restrictions on traveling to Moscow. It was very inexpensive.

	During the height of the Cold War?  I find that statement
astounding.  Travel to Moscow was most certainly restricted.  You were
not able to travel freely, you could only travel to certain areas and
at certain times.  And you were always shadowed by KGB, who were
concerned that you would come in contact with dissidents or other
civilians.

>  who was attending Oslo University.  He met Father McSorley
>  coincidentally at the Oslo train station, they traveled to the

	Not according to Father McSorley.  Now, either Clinton or
McSorley is lying.  Since Clinton misrepresents his claims and
has not come clean on any of this other stuff, I believe McSorley.

>  and that he attended several anti-war marches.  He participated in no
>  anti-American demonstrations.

	Not according to McSorley.


	You are obviously missing a lot of the picture.  I'm no Bush
fan.  I voted for Mondale and Dukakis, but Clinton is not desirable.
The only reason the Democrats like him is because they smell blood.  The
leftists will run roughshod over him if he gets in office.  He will be
very ineffective, because he won't dare go against the Democrats, and if
he gives in to the higher taxes and bigger government (as he must), he
will be straying from his "moderate" stance.

	Bush's problem is that he abandoned his conservatism and gave in
to the liberals, signing the 1990 tax increase.  You remember -- "the
second largest tax increase in history" -- despite the fact that all
such bills must originate in Congress (the House), and that it was a
tax increase which did not improve the economy, yet the Democrats want
more of the same.

	Part of me hopes Clinton is elected.  He and his cronies will
surely plunge us deep into economic doo-doo.  It may well spell the
death of the Democrats, as people will see that they have been played
for fools, emptying out their wallets and bank accounts to feed an
increasingly-ravenous government black hole.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh