HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 08:25:56 -0500 
From: Liz Fox <lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: DOOL: TAN: A rendezvous at CMU????
	<1992Nov10.000149.10841@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
	<of0IzRq00VICMumUZg@andrew.cmu.edu>

On 11-Nov-92 in Re: DOOL: TAN: A rendezvous..
user Marcus W. Banzhaf@andrew writes:
>
>In article <MezcROq00iV3A1fi0m@andrew.cmu.edu> Liz Fox
><lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>>>Whoops...  You just blew it dude.  I know, I know... you're just trying
>>>to get points with the Hot Lixstress so you can run across campus for
>>>some afternoon rendezvous.  Well, it just ain't gonna work bub.  Right
>>>Liz?  Oh Liz?  :-)
>>
>>This is Liz's secretary - she was unable to respond to this message
>>because she is gone for the day.  It seems that a handsome CMU student
>>named Marcus came by with a case of Rolling Rock and they said something
>>about going somewhere cozy to drink the RR and watch some old Diana and
>>Roman tapes.
>>
>>Secretary to the Big Banana
>Tim responded:
> 
>*Dear Secretary to the Big B,
> 
>*Thank you for the briefing.  I'm sure the hot Lixstress was quite 
>*thrilled to see this whole case of Rolling Rock, a very fancy 
>*libation by her standards.  
> 
>And imagine her surprise when we pulled up to that old, cozy, abandoned
>lighthouse down by the river.  Can't recall which one of Pittsburgh's 3
>rivers it was on though.  The entire afternoon has become a blurr.  A
>half a case of Rolling Rock does it every time. :), 
> 
>-marcus
> 

Marcus, I just want to thank you for the *wonderful* afternoon.  The
lighthouse was everything I'd imagined....;).  Oh Vix - next time you're
in the 'burgh you'll have to see it too!

-A blushing banana
From: daveo@hpcvra.cv.hp.com (Dave Ochs)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: Re: AMC: Destiny on the Danube
Date: 6 Nov 92 16:11:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: hpcvra.191630001
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, OR, USA

>/ hpcvra:rec.arts.tv.soaps / mjmh@crsa.bu.edu (Michael J M Holmes) / 12:55 pm  Nov  3, 1992 /
>In article <1992Nov3.175533.12542@athena.mit.edu> zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria) writes:
>>Notice, please I am calling it Density on The Danube :-) So if you
>>read this and for some crazy reason, you are liking DOTD too, and
>>haven't spoken up, lemme know! :-)
...
>Count me in!  Sure, the hype may be a little tacky, but this
>IS something I have been looking forward to - and I am not
>even that big a fan of the Erica-Dmitri coupling!!

I am enjoying it too.  I haven't seen much of the hype ... its probably
just as well ... but I am soooooo glad to get away from WildWind.  Its
much more fun in Budapest, and the scenery is interesting.

>So far, we have been getting a taste of an exotic locale, with
>a new, mysterious female character, plus the melodrama of Dmitri's
>lovesick sprint across the Atlantic.  Erica and Dmitri are both
>dreaming of seeing each other... But PsychoEdmund and CrazyHellcat
>lurk in the wings, eager to destroy all chances of our couples
>happiness... (you can't help but GET soapy describing this storyline!).

It is soapish, but its fun too ... something which AMC has been missing
for some time!  I find Hellcat a scream, but Eddie is really getting on
my nerves with his rudeness and self-centered attitude.  I think he
deserves to join EmAnn.  Unfortunately, we will probably get to see the
150th replay of that same scene between him and Dimitri!

>mike

Dave Ochs            "Even if I did hit her it wouldn't have done any good
daveo@cv.hp.com      ... [sigh] should'a used a pail of water, that was it!"
                         - Edmund to Dr Tolan, about "Broom" Helga
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: 6357940@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Subject: Re: AMC: Erica & Dim & the Motorcycle
Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 19:52:26 GMT

------------------------- Original Article -------------------------

Karen Swanson, University of Louisville writes;

>How can Erica and Dimitri not NOTICE that a motorcycle is following them?
>It is not very far behind them and they seem to be the only 2 people in the
>streets of Budapest!  I guess we're supposed to think that they are so
>deeply in love that they don't notice that they are being shadowed by a noisy
>motorcycle!  P-lease!

My sentiments exactly.  This went on all through Wednesday's show.
I couldn't believe it either!!!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: patstew@oz.plymouth.edu (Pat Steward)
Subject: Re: LOV:  Update - WED 04 NOV
Reply-To: patstew@oz.plymouth.edu (Pat Steward)
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, N.H.
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 19:34:29 GMT

In article <5NOV199207273173@mrl.arc.nasa.gov> holst@mrl.arc.nasa.gov (Laura Holst) writes:
>
>(BTW, the role of Clay Alden is being played by Dennis (someone)
>in Larkin Malloy's absense :)

Hi, I'm one of the AMC crossover people!

Does anyone know why Larkin Malloy is absent???  I've only been
reading the "LOV" headings for about two weeks and haven't seen any
related discussion.

Not that I miss him, mind, after having gotten rid of his nostril-
flaring face from AMC just recently!
-- 
Pat Martin Steward                          patstew@oz.plymouth.edu
I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is;
I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express senti-
ments that differentiate me from a doormat.       Rebecca West, 1913
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: n2413@cray.com (Jo Theis,#Rich Franta)
Subject: Re: ATWT : Predictions
Reply-To: n2413@cray.com
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 6 Nov 92 08:09:43 CST

In article 783@cbnewsj.cb.att.com, roxy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (r.prisco) writes:
> In article <1cs531INNcuf@rave.larc.nasa.gov>, mcelroy@avd33.larc.nasa.gov (Marcus O. McElroy) writes:
> > 
> > >>NickNick (Is it official?)
> 
> Personally, I prefer NickNack, as in something gorgeous to be placed lovingly
> on a shelf to be admired, dusted, fondled, etc.....
                                    ^^^^^^^
Well, Steve, I don't know how you could possible turn this down... :)

> > 
> > Wait a minute, I don't recall any initiation for me when I unlurked. :-(
> > 
> > McMark

The operative phrase here being "...I don't recall..."!
> 
> 
> Meet Sal and me (welcome back to our gal, BTW!) in JlJ's room after lights out
> .... don't know how we could have passed up this opportunity!!!

Geez, RiBabe, don't YOU remember it either?!  Well, what the hey; I'm up for a
repeat performance.  See you after lights out.

- JlJ

---
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Jo Theis	  	  |         Unless you're the lead dog,      
    n2413@cray.com        | 	    the view is always the same.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: linda@unix.SRI.COM (Linda J. Szkoropad)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: SB/I have a great TAN (get it)
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:09:34 GMT
Distribution: all
Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park, California

Did any of you see Fatal Memories...on CBS?  if you did were you thinking of
BJ?  Could you see Julia as the defender?  Could you hear Julia say
"Objective! Misleading Witness"?  

Sandwiched between SB and this movie was an ad for another movie
about a  little boy being abused by his guardian, and the birth
mother trying to find him.

I felt very unsettled last night thinking about all the sick
caretakers in this world, and then reading more in the paper today!

Linda Szkoropad


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: steph@ivy.Princeton.EDU (Stephanie Eggers)
Subject: AMC: Soap Couples
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University, Electrical Engineering Dept.
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 17:59:49 GMT

From: mroberts@UTKUX1.UTK.EDU (Mary K.)
Organization: University of Tennessee Computing Center

>What man, if any, would you like to see paired with the following women?
>(And "why?")

>1.  Angelique
     I think I would like to see Angelique try to make it on her
     own, I do like her and Jack together but I am a big Jack and
     Erica Fan!

>2.  Brooke
     Edmond and her are good together if he could just get himself
     straigtened out!

>3.  Dixie
    When Tad comes back I want them to get back together and I'm
    probably in the minority on this one.

>4.  An-Li
    Who Cares?

>5.  Erica
     Jack of course but if Jack is going to stay with Angel then
     I think Adam.
   

>6.  Hayley
     I never wanted her and Brian to break up but if they just get
     rid of Brian then I would like to see her with Charlie.

>7.  Livia
     I like her with Tom.

>8.  Taylor
     I would like to see her with Terrence or Derek.
    

>9.  Natalie
     Trevor, its about time for them to settle into another Joe
     Ruth.

>10  Galen
     Steven, but I think it would be interesting if Carter goes off
     to be reformed and comes back and Galen takes him back.

>11  Myrtle
     ?

>12  Phoebe
     Langley I suppose.

>13  Ruth
     Joe of course.  

>14  Gloria
     If Tad doesn't go back with Dixie then he could go a few
     rounds with Gloria.

>15  Mimi
     I think Lucas.

>16  Helga
     How about Dimitri?


>Thank you.  

>-MaryK   |  "My daughter, never let a wishbone grow where a backbone is
>         |   supposed to be."  -- ?


Stephanie Eggers
steph@ivy.princeton.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: dias@cac.washington.edu (Vivian Dias )
Subject: Re: SB chatter
Keywords: where is everyone?
Organization: UW Computing
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 18:26:00 GMT

In article <40236@unix.SRI.COM>, linda@unix.SRI.COM (Linda J. Szkoropad) writes:
> Where is everybody?  At least 1x a week I can't get onto the net,
> its very frustrating because I want to read about SB, and I can't
> believe there are hardly any posts today!

  We're here.  My problem is I have this pesky job-thing that keeps getting
  in the way of my life.  
> 
> At the store yesterday, I noticed SOD had Warren and BJ on the cover
> and its said "When will they ever get to make love" 

  Sorry, but who cares anymore?  Warren is acting like a jackass and BJ
  isn't even acting.   
> 
> I thought they already did!?

  Nope, keep getting interrupted.
> 
> The cover also said something about SB's finale...if somebody read
> it please post it, I'm too cheap to buy one!!

  The last episode is Jan 15, right?  Will we all be converging on Pitts
  about that time?  Suzanne has been awfully quite lately.  Did we scare
  her off????
> 
> 
> 
> Now Andie and Reese know a secret about Ken Mathis (that he abuses
> women)...I can't wait until he's blackmailed.

  It was mentioned by someone else that Frank was a much better villan than
  Ken.  I second that!  I could see Frank beating Andie up and then doing the
  repentent I-don't-know-what-came-over-me-it-will-never-happen-again monologue
  and being believed.  This Ken-doll is useless.  You wanted to believe that
  there was a spark of decency left in Frank and that just maybe there was
  hope for him.  The actor conveyed that extremely well, but this Ken-doll
  person is useless.  He conveys nothing.  I don't care about him except to
  the extent that I dearly hope Reese does something extremely painful and
  unpleasant to him very soon.
> 
> I can't believe Julia lost the judgship!!!!  This is as they say
> "The year of the woman"...It seems so unfair to Julia (who is more
> decent than Mason)...come on writers you screwed
> up...unless....Mason becomes recalled or something.

  Patience, the Year of the Woman is at hand and peace shall spread throughout
  the land...

> I don't like all the games between
> Lisa/Ted/Rafe/Angela/CC/Gina/Lionel...its really a turn off, can't
> the writers find something more interesting for them.

  Is Lisa really as dumb as she seems?  I'm beginning to think she and Rafe
  deserve each other.  And Angela, what are they doing to her?!?!?  Who is
  this wimpy-oh-woe-is-me-no-one-loves-poor-little-rich-intelligent-gorgeous-
  me-whatever-am-I-to-do.  Yuck, pitooey.  Angela deserves better than Ted
  or CC.  Let's see, maybe Micah.  He's sophisticated, rich, attractive and
  that dark, Latin type looks good with those blond, Scandinavian types.
> 
 
> I think Rafe looked cute in the turtle neck at Mason's party, where
> was Sophia!

  popping pills...

  You want cute, how about Mason in a tux?  Remember the restaurant scene
  when Julia started fantasizing she and Mason dancing...ah, Mason, a man
  for all seasons.  

  -Vivian 
> 
Organization: Sophomore, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Fri,  6 Nov 1992 22:01:14 -0500 
From: Jennifer Allyson Turner <jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: GH: Lucas/Bobby/Tiff custody

Scott said:

> 	There was just a thread about how Bobby and Tiff were acting all buddy-
> buddy, when they hated each other not long ago.  That's true, but remember
> Cheryl and Bobby?  They really were at each other's throats!  I can't believe
> Cheryl would leave her son with the woman who kept him from her.  It just
> doesn't make sense, does it?  And if she doesn't, there's no custody battle,
> and no storyline.
 
Mike replied:

>That is my sentiment. It would make absolutely no sense....wait a minute
>not much of what they do does make sense! <g>
<stuff deleted>
>I know I know. I never in my wildest dreams would think that Cheryl would
>be loopy enough to leave Lucas to that Boobie woman.
> 
>But I must say this, they have us all guessing and stuff, so they must be
>doing something right. I mean I would to think that every story was
>predictable.

But what you are both forgetting is that Cheryl wasn't only on the outs
with Tiffany.  SHE HATED HER!!!!  Cheryl was so in love with Robert and
so desperate to get him back that she would have done anything.  And
Tiffany telling her to get over Robert... well, that was a bad move.  

I can see Cheryl wanting Bobbie to have custody because she took care of
the child for the first year-and-a-half of his life.  Not to mention
that she's a nurse, her husband's a doctor, and Lucas is diabetic.

Bobbie and Tony already have one child, and other children living with
them.  Sean and Tiffany are just a couple, both work and are intent on
their careers.  As we saw just yesterday, Tiffany doesn't even know what
acetimenophen is!!!  Which couple would you hand YOUR kid over to?

And if this scenario doesn't work for you, try this one: Cheryl WAS a
nutcase.  Do you remember the way she obsessed over Robert being the
father?  It was UNnatural.  No one knows what a wacko will do, in which
case, giving Bobbie custody was the most natural thing in the world.

Jenn "who aspires to one day be a GH writer"

PS  What I'd like to know is how the hell Lucas recognized Tiffany when
he hasn't seen her in a year-and-a-half?  The kid is three years old and
he remembers her??  And if he remembered her, then why didn't he
remember Bobbie??  
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: C11815@maccvm.corp.mot.com (Josette Giacobbi)
Subject: Re: Y&R different timezone??
Organization: Motorola
Date: 12 Nov 1992 13:44:48 CST

Someone was discussing different days for different scenes during the show
this week.  I find that confusing also.  I have been watching what outfits
they are wearing in order to know if they are in the same day.  All i know
is that Victoria has beenwearing that same "riding jacket" (?)for the past
three days.Also, today's show (11-12) was INTERRUPTED by Pres.Elec.Clinton
just as I finally sat down to watch it.  josette
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: IDSWB@ASUACAD.BITNET
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Zeus
Date: 12 Nov 92 15:35:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: ASUACAD.92317.083506IDSWB
Distribution: world
Organization: Arizona State University

Doreen writes:
>> Is there anyone else out there who feels sorry that poor Zeus has
>> lost his owner?  I must say that Zeus is the second most adorable
>> kitty (with mine being the first, IMHO).
>>
>> OK, so I was the kind of person who would watch a movie where a building
>> was on fire and worry that all the pets got out ok, so call me a
>> mushpot.

Rose writes:
>     Me too!  Poor Zeus, he must be so scared and lonely! :-(
>Of course, I'm still worried/confused about Steve and Kayla's
>cat Emily, who disappeared sometime on 1990.  I hope she's okay
>(guess they decided not to renew her contract!)
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I write:
Oh Rose, Thank you for making my morning.  This was great!  I'm having a real
problem being here today and your little comment made it easier.  I hate having
a day off in the middle of the week because it makes me want to have another
(like a week-end ya know).

A hoping another cup of coffee will wake me up Quince

 **************Don't start posting unless you have plenty of time************
 *                                                                          *
 * There are new territories to explore and *  IDSWB@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU     *
 * conquer - so do it.        Spread your   *  Arizona State University     *
 * wings and go in search of new horizons.  *  Place usual disclaimer here  *
 *                      ASU Pegasus         *                               *
 *                                                                          *
 *   S   E       O       S   E       O       S    E      O       S   E      *
 *    M L      R  W       M L       R W       M L       R W       M L       *
 *     I      F    N       I       F   N       I       F   N       I        *
 *************************It's addicting*************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jackie8@dasher.cc.bellcore.com ()
Subject: Re: SIS: Sisters - any viewers in r.a.t.s?
Organization: Bellcore - Piscataway, NJ
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 14:54:19 GMT

In article <rek1.721058245@Ra.MsState.Edu> rek1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Robert Kennedy) writes:
>kmadden@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Karen T Madden) writes:
>>I too am a "Sisters" viewer, and would enjoy having it included in r.a.t.s.
>>I think the acronym SIS is good. Anyone else???
>>Karen T. Madden      
>
>I enjoy _SISTERS_ myself.  I have a feeling that Teddy and Simon Bolt are
>going to get much more involved.  I think though, that Georgie already

Now I can't remember what the line was but my favorite line was when
John said something like that bolt is really getting on my nerves,
and Teddy said "I know what you mean." I thought when Simon was talking
about his brother it was really nice. He seemed so much nicer. And I
liked that they gave him a child to talk to, too, like the Sisters have.

>had a test and that Mitch and (darn, what is her name?) know that they

Frankie!
>are going to have a son, already.  At least, I THINK this has happened, 
>but I'm not sure.
>

I don't think that they had a test done. What I think you might be thinking
of is the episode where Frankie and Mitch decide to raise their child
in a Jewish way.  They were at the barmitzvah of his nephew and I
think they kept saying "our son" but then Frankie made a point of saying
"or if it's a girl".  Because I remember thinking "Did I miss something?"
and how did they know what it was.  But I know that as of two episodes ago
they were still talking about what to name it if it was a girl.

I'm so glad there are other Sisters fans out there. :-)
Jackie
---
Jackie Brady/jackie8@cc.bellcore.com/908-699-5458 (insert usual disclaimer)
(do not reply to the address in "From:" section. Use id in .sig to reply)
From: steveh@grafex.Cupertino.CA.US (Steve Harding KA6ETB)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: 11-5 babydoll update
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 92 21:36:54 PST
Distribution: usa
Organization: The GRAFex Company

llk@pyrxbooter.eng.pyramid.com (Lynn Lassalle-Klein) writes:

> Was it ever said who was in the picture with Chairolegs?

Yup.

stever

-- 
play:steveh@grafex.Cupertino.CA.US 408.252.0578     work:harding@nas.nasa.gov
              A prince trapped in the body of a dirty old man.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: judim@wes.on.ca (Judi Mota)
Subject: Re: LOV JACK'S DEATH
Organization: Waterloo Engineering Software
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 14:04:42 GMT

In article <92316.004914FGBCC@CUNYVM.BITNET> <FGBCC@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:
>Ciao Soapsters
>
>Anybody under the opinion that Jack is still alive, and that evil ol Clay
>might have had an (under) hand in Jack's alleged demise?  Lately I have been
>thinking that Jack has been abducted and held somewhere by the Clayster
>to get the Alden blue ribbon stock.  Anyone thinking along these lines?
>
>Just wondering if I lost my mind, anyone in the same mental state?

I never thought about Clay abducting Jack!  Great thinking!  And very 
possible too!

Isn't it strange that Clay is always doing something underhanded and always
promises that he's going to change (at least he's always promising Trisha that)
and he continues to do nasty things.  And then he'll do something nice,
everyone forgives him, and then he goes back to the same old Clay.  Sometimes,
I get tired of his scenes, they're so predictable.

Sorry, just my 2 cents worth!
Judi

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: toni@dmntor.UUCP (Toni Spurgeon)
Subject: B&B - this week
Organization: Digital Media Networks, Toronto, Canada
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 19:35:49 GMT


Hi all! I couldn't even sit through that sap with Stephanie
and Jack on Friday! UGH! I also hate all this red herring
stuff between Taylor and Ridge! Here's the look ahead...

Stephanie is shocked when Jack reveals he's Zack's dad...
Karen and Macy get into a food fight (get ready Jim!!)
after hurling insults at one another... Sheila wonders
if she made a mistake asking Molly to come to L.A.
to meet Eric.

Soap Opera Weekly:
Karen anc Macy have a heart to heart, but neither is closer
to getting the man they love.... Jack's truth-telling makes
his son proud but causes the woman he loves to turn away...
Taylor fears European events may have ended her marriage...
Ridge gets Tyalor to admit she's insecure... Molly wanrs 

Sheila that the littles lie will result in Molly telling
Eric the truth... Eric and Jack come to blows...
Sally's hope for a reunion with Jack are encouuraged as
she notices the rift growing between  Jack and Stephanie...
EEric gives Stephanie a shoulder to cry on... Next week:
Sheila is upset with Eric's concern for Stephanie

That's all for now! Enjoy!
Toni
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: ac@cheshire.oxy.edu (Aileen Cho)
Subject: Re: ATWT: Inmate List
Organization: Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041 USA.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 00:16:26 GMT


  It's ac@cheshire.oxy.edu, not ax!  So what's my nickname?