HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: steven@spxtech.qc.ca (Steve Potter)
Newsgroups: can.general
Subject: Re: C solution to Magic Square
Date: 29 Sep 92 12:43:29 GMT
Distribution: can
Organization: Securiplex Technologies Inc., Montreal, Canada
X-Bytes: 2587

From article <1992Sep25.160934.3008@newshub.ccs.yorku.ca>, by landolt@nexus.yorku.ca (Paul Landolt):
> 
> My question is: Is there a simple(r) mathematical method of solving the
> magic square for any size? Anyone? Any ideas? Has anyone seen C source that
> will do this?
> 

For odd numbered (1,3,5,7,9,...) square dimensions the algorithm is easy:-


Start at centre of top row first number in sequence. (e.g. = 1)

Move up and right one box sequentially with following rules:-

i) Next number in sequence must be next number in simple algabraic
   progression. (i.e. 1,2,3,... or 235,236,237,... or 2,4,6,... or
                      5,10,15,... or   15,18,21, ... etc. got it?)

ii) When you have filled a number of boxes which is a multiple of
    the dimension of the magic square, drop down one.

ii) When you land outside the box go to the opposite side.


E.G.:-

   dimension = 3          
                           
   [ ] [1] [ ]      [ ] [1] [ ]      [ ] [1] [ ]     [ ] [1] [ ]
   [ ] [ ] [ ]      [*] [ ] [ ]      [3] [ ] [ ]     [3] [*] [ ]
   [ ] [ ] [*]      [ ] [ ] [2]      [*] [ ] [2]     [4] [ ] [2]
                            

   [ ] [1] [*]      [ ] [1] [6]      [*] [1] [6]     [8] [1] [6]
   [3] [5] [ ]      [3] [5] [*]      [3] [5] [7]     [3] [5] [7]
   [4] [ ] [2]      [4] [ ] [2]      [4] [ ] [2]     [4] [*] [2]


   [8] [1] [6]       Remember Up to the right, drop on multiple,
   [3] [5] [7]       over the edge=use opposite side. ok?
   [4] [9] [2]


   dimension = 5

                        [17] [24] [ 1] [ 8] [15]
                        [23] [ 5] [ 7] [14] [16]
                        [ 4] [ 6] [13] [20] [17]
                        [10] [12] [19] [21] [ 3]
                        [11] [18] [25] [ 2] [ 9]


This method will work for any simple (not geometric)) number series in
any odd-dimensioned square.

You can figure out the formula for the magic sum yourself:-

For magic squares beginning with one and incrementing one at a time you
should have d=1,s=1 ; d=3,s=15 ; d=5,s=65 ; d=7,s=175 ; d=9,s=369 ; ...

Shortcut:-)
If you use a computer to generate the magic square, you can have it add
one of the matrix columns after the square has been filled. Then you
don't need a formula.

This brings back memories for me, thanks :-)

-- 
  ///==================================================================\\\
  ||| Steve Potter:         steven%spxtech@CAM.ORG                     |||
  ||| Expertise/Experience: Computer Systems Engineering / Real Ale /  |||
  |||                       Politics in Education in Quebec            |||
Newsgroups: can.general
From: donald@sq.sq.com (Donald Teed)
Subject: Re: For those who like the German example of highways ...
Organization: SoftQuad Inc., Toronto, Canada
Distribution: can
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 12:41:58 GMT

pt@geovision.gvc.com (Paul Tomblin) writes:

>I don't see your point.  Large pile ups occur in the fog on every major
>highway in the world, speed limits or no.  I've seen them on Highway 400 in
>Ontario, and I've seen them on the M40 Motorway in England.  Why should the
>very mention of a pile up in fog on an Autobahn "make the hair stand up on
>your neck"?

Oh, I guess it had something to do with the number quoted of over
220 vehicles piled up.  I have no idea how many dead.  But if you
find news of large scale highway accidents boring, never mind.

--Donald Teed

Xref: sparky can.general:4692 can.politics:7667 ott.general:1161
From: rossw@sco.COM (Ross Wetmore)
Newsgroups: can.general,can.politics,ott.general
Subject: Re: October 26th Referendum
Date: 3 Oct 92 04:20:47 GMT
Organization: SCO Canada, Inc.

In article <1992Oct01.232156.10478@r-node.gts.org> yung@r-node.gts.org (Amos Yung) writes:
>In article <q74uRB1w165w@aqua.ocunix.on.ca> cowan@aqua.ocunix.on.ca (Darin Cowan (root)) writes:
>>wetmore@theochem.uwaterloo.ca (Ross W. Wetmore) writes:
>>>   On the otherhand there is no good reason not too, and since the result is
>>> usually a bit more peace and quiet for the rest of us, why not?
>>
>>That is the yes side motivation that I am afraid too many people have.
>>Vote yes for imagined peace and quiet.   Sad that those people would see
>>democracy eroded away in favour of "peace an quiet".
>
>I tend to agree with Ross. Vote "yes" just to get the damn thing over with
>and to get the much needed attention from our beloved politicians back to
>the desparate economy.
>Amos Yung          | Macintosh Jr.: The power to crush the other kid.

  The yes above was to one specific facet of the Accord, and the rationale
was that though this was certainly nothing I would have introduced, someone
clearly feels it is in their best interest to have it. I am satisfied by
some elements of the Accord, and bow to the principle of compromise where
I see no real reason to oppose others. 

  No one should ever vote solely on the basis of frustration, though as
one more of many secondary reasons I see nothing wrong in adding it to the 
scales :-).
---- 
Ross W. Wetmore - (416)922-1937 x259    | RFC822net: rossw@scocan.sco.COM
SCO Canada Inc, Toronto, Ont, Canada.   | UUCP:{uunet,utcsri}!scocan!rossw
<std.disclaimer>
----
Xref: sparky can.general:4721 ott.general:1171 can.politics:7784
From: beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Denis Beauregard)
Newsgroups: can.general,ott.general,can.politics
Subject: Re: October 26th Referendum
Date: 2 Oct 92 02:35:12 GMT
Organization: Institut de recherche d'Hydro-Quebec, Varennes, Canada

In article <BvEEJp.3sA@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> dbowman@shade (Don A. Bowman) writes:
>Do you really believe that the legal version will be different than the
>summary? After all, in order to make any changes of intent, everybody would
>have to agree again. I think that all the final copy will have that the
>summary does not is clarification. There will be no 'surprises'.

It was said (not sure if radio or TV) that there are _now_ differences
and even opposites between the Charlottetown and the final version.
This was by persons working as constitutionallists on the text (I think
on TV news last week).

-- 
  \_\    Denis Beauregard  *  internet:beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca
 /   \   Genealogiste des familles : Beauregard/Jarret/Jarest/Vincent
J   __>  Un Quebec renouvele dans une Amerique renovee
\_.-===  Non a une entente au contenu secret      Mon opinion ? Non !
Newsgroups: can.general,can.politics,ott.general
From: golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy)
Subject: Re: October 26th Referendum
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 12:20:09 GMT

In article <Bv76BE.JLK@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> wetmore@theochem.uwaterloo.ca (Ross W. Wetmore) writes:
>>
>>If there's no good reason for Quebec's population to decline that sharply,
>>then there is no good reason to put the floor provision in the
>>Constitution. 
>>Jim Robinson
>
>  There is no good reason to shove a pacifier in a child's mouth.
>
>  On the otherhand there is no good reason not too, and since the result is
>usually a bit more peace and quiet for the rest of us, why not?
>

The trouble is that we are not sticking a pacifier into the child's
mouth but a lighted stick of dynamite with a slow-burning fuse...

Gerald
Xref: sparky can.general:4635 can.politics:7415 soc.culture.canada:6951
From: thood@corvus.matrox.com (Thomas Hood)
Newsgroups: can.general,can.politics,soc.culture.canada
Subject: Re: The alleged Canadian politburo
Date: 28 Sep 92 16:53:08 GMT
Organization: Matrox Ltd.

golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:

>Let's consider and example...say the feds and Quebec reach and agreement
>where the federal government delegates all its power in relation to 
>the environment to Quebec...2.5 years later the Alberta government
>demands the same agreement, and according to section 26, the federal
>government is supposed to oblige.  Suppose 2.5 years after that when
>we have a new federal government, Quebec's agreement expires, and but
>Alberta has an agreement, so Quebec can demand equal treatment, [...]

Tricky!  It is a vicious circle, but I doubt that the courts would rule
against the federal government if it attempted to break out.  It offends
the principle of the five-year limit.

>Such agreements should be binding only to the end of the terms of
>the governments involved...or otherwise it strips away the legitimate
>democratic power of legislature to spend and tax.
>Gerald

I agree.  The "protection of intergovernmental agreements" clause should
be phrased so that it can only be applied to agreements on the sharing
of jurisdiction.  Since I believe this was the original intent, perhaps
it will be clarified in the legal text.  Let's hope so.

--
Thomas Hood                                                    thood@matrox.com
Montreal
Xref: sparky can.general:4785 ott.general:1197 can.politics:8019
From: pascal@nextasy.physics.mcmaster.ca (Pascal Gaudette)
Subject: Re: Musique quebecoise
Organization: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 20:19:19 GMT

In article <SBO.92Sep23111710@froh.vlsi.polymtl.ca> sbo@vlsi.polymtl.ca  
(Stephane Boucher) writes:

>   > Au niveau jazz (je ne suis pas specialiste): Uzeb, Vic Vogel...
> 
> Oscar Peterson (?). Il y a aussi le batteur ("drummer" en
> bon francais) Guy Nadon qui est un peu special, mais je ne
> crois pas qu'il ait fait de disque.
> 

Oui, je crois bien qu'il a endisque', j'ai une toune de lui sur
un CD de demonstration de Radio-Canada. Le nom du groupe est
"Guy Nadon et la polution des sons" ou quelque chose comme ca.

Il y a aussi Lorraine Desmarrais: une excellente
pianiste; Michel Cusson & the Wild Unit: un fabuleux
disque de fusion de la part du guitariste d'UZEB; Michel
Donato: un contrebassiste, particulierement pour ces 2
disques avec Karen Young; le Francois Bourassa Trio: le
fils de BouBou a decide' qu'il prefere le jazz a la politique
:-) ...

Les amateurs de Richard Desjardins devraient aussi jeter un
coup d'oreille au disque solo de Karen Young, une americaine
qui a ete "adoptee" par les jazzmen quebecois. Elle y donne
une merveilleuse interpretation de trois ou quatre tounes
de Desjardins. Personnelement, je trouve que la combinaison
auteur/interprete Desjardins/Young produit une chimie
extraordinaire. (Il y a aussi une ou deux tounes de Desjardins
sur le disque "Envol" de Young/Donato, et particulierement, une
*sublime* interpretation de "Lucky".)

--
Pascal "The Rascal" Gaudette       pascal@nextasy.physics.mcmaster.ca
MacNUG president                      | *NeXTmail encouraged* 
graduate student, McMaster university | Je ne suis pas infaillible.
Physics and astronomy dep.            | Vive le Quebec LIBRE!
From: alawrenc@sobeco.com (a.lawrence)
Newsgroups: can.francais
Subject: Re: SOFTWARE=logiciel ?
Date: 25 Sep 92 23:12:28 GMT
Reply-To: alawrenc@sobeco.com
Organization: Lawrence & Assc.

>In article 1@uwovax.uwo.ca, 35002_3044@uwovax.uwo.ca () writes:
>>Pourriez-vous me dire si "software" est bel et bien logiciel en francais
>>ici au canada autant qu'en europe?
>>marcel a. fortin

Oui, mais on utilise aussi le term 'progiciel' pour 'application software'.

-- 
If any given program runs correctly, it is obsolete.
=========================================================================
Andrew Lawrence, Informaticien Conseil           |  alawrenc@sobeco.com
3605 St-Urbain, #1605                            |  uunet!sobeco!alawrenc
From: CZ94@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA (CZ94)
Newsgroups: can.francais
Subject: Re: Musique quebecoise
Date: 24 Sep 92 13:23:23 GMT
Organization: McGill University

In article <SBO.92Sep23111710@froh.vlsi.polymtl.ca> sbo@vlsi.polymtl.ca (Stephane Boucher) writes:
>>>>>> On 22 Sep 92 15:47:36 GMT, larochep@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Laroche Pierre) said:
>
>  > Au niveau jazz (je ne suis pas specialiste): Uzeb, Vic Vogel...
>
>Oscar Peterson (?). Il y a aussi le batteur ("drummer" en
>bon francais) Guy Nadon qui est un peu special, mais je ne
>crois pas qu'il ait fait de disque.
>
Oscar Peterson est originaire de Montreal, mais habite maintenant
en banlieue de Toronto.  Oliver Jones, son ami d'enfance, est lui
aussi un grand pianiste, et habite toujours Montreal.

Tom Box
CZ94@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA
From: markus@clement.info.umoncton.ca (MARC PAULIN)
Newsgroups: can.francais
Subject: Re: Je suis nouveau!!!
Keywords: new_user
Date: 28 Sep 92 17:06:08 GMT
Organization: Universite de Moncton

In article <lancelot.717473952@tdsb-s> lancelot@mais.hydro.qc.ca (Christian Doucet) writes:
>From: lancelot@mais.hydro.qc.ca (Christian Doucet)
>Subject: Re: Je suis nouveau!!!
>Keywords: new_user
>Date: 26 Sep 92 02:19:12 GMT

>markus@clement.info.umoncton.ca (MARC PAULIN) ecrit:

>>Bonjour,

>>       Je suis nouveau ici.  Je viens de Moncton, Nouveau-Brunswick, Canada.
>>Je suis ne a Valleyfield, Quebec.

>>Marc

>Bienvenue sur Usenet!

>--
>Christian Doucet ----- lancelot@Mais.Hydro.Qc.Ca | Hydro-Quebec
>System Administrator - lancelot@Rot.Qc.Ca        | voice: + 1 514 858 7704
>I speak for myself! -- #include <disclaimer.h>   | fax  : + 1 514 858 7799
>"Humans use only 10% of their brain cells, the rest is taken up by the OS"

	Merci.  Il etait temps que j'arrive.  :)
                                         ____
              _  _  _                  / \   \ 
            /' )' )' )                |   |   |           
              /  /  /                 | (_|__/         \   
             /     /  __. .__    ___  |   |  __.  . .   \  .   ___ 
            /     (__(_/|__) )__/(__   \_/__(_/|__)\_)__/\__)__) <_ 
                  Internet:    markus@clement.info.umoncton.ca
                  Talk Deamon: 8900795@clement.info.umoncton.ca
From: audetf@Software.Mitel.COM (Francois Audet)
Newsgroups: can.francais
Subject: Re: SOFTWARE=logiciel ?
Date: 5 Oct 92 13:26:59 GMT
Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada.

In article <BvI9K2.6nI@ireq.hydro.qc.ca> beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Denis Beauregard) writes:
>Un progiciel est un FIRMWARE selon moi, tout comme c'est un application
>software ou un package.  Ce ne sont pas des definitions contradictoires
>mais differentes facettes de la meme definition.

Pas du tout. Firmware, c'est un programme enregistrer sur EPROM. Comme
dans un telephone (specialise evidemment) par exemple.
-- 
                                                       Francois Audet
                                                           '
        Telephone: (613) 592-2121 x1754     Facsimile: (613) 592-4784
                          Internet: Francois.Audet@software.Mitel.COM
From: nadeau@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Nadeau Jean-Claude)
Newsgroups: can.francais
Subject: Re: SOFTWARE=logiciel ?
Date: 5 Oct 92 15:36:00 GMT
Organization: Universite de Montreal

In article <BvI9K2.6nI@ireq.hydro.qc.ca> beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Denis Beauregard) writes:

	...

>Un progiciel est un FIRMWARE selon moi, tout comme c'est un application
>software ou un package.  Ce ne sont pas des definitions contradictoires
>mais differentes facettes de la meme definition.

	Je crois que les americains utilisent le mot FIRMWARE plutot
	dans le sens de SOFTWARE dont le support physique est de la
	memoire morte (HARDWARE).

-- 
Jean-Claude Nadeau, ing.	<nadeau@ERE.UMontreal.CA>
Services informatiques		Tel. (514) 343-6111,ext 5234
Universite de Montreal		Fax  (514) 343-2155
Xref: sparky can.francais:573 can.politics:7673
From: riese@litsun.epfl.ch (Marc Riese)
Newsgroups: can.francais,can.politics
Subject: notwithstanding clause nonobstandante
Date: 1 Oct 92 08:22:31 GMT
Followup-To: can.politics


L'accord de Charlottetown indique (je paraphrase) :
 "Autres questions ont ete discutees pendant les seance multilaterales.
  Le consensus etait de ne pas poursuivre les points suivants :
  ...   @ changements a la `clause nonobstandante'".

Alors :

1. Qu'est-ce que le texte ci-dessus veut dire ?
2a. Qu'est-ce la clause nonobstandante ?
 b. Quand peut-elle etre invoquee ?
 c. Quel est son rapport avec la constitution actuelle ?
 d. Quel est son rapport avec la charte de droits ?
3. Quand pourrait-il etre invoque si l'accord reussit ?

J'ai cru qu'un des buts majeurs des discussions de reforme
etait d'obvier et, d'une facon ou une autre, d'eliminer cette clause.

????

------------------------------

The Charlottetown Accord states:
"VI: OTHER ISSUES
 Other constitutional issues were discussed during the multilateral meetings.
 The consensus was not pursue the following issues:
...        @ changes to the `notwithstanding clause'"

So:

1. What does the above mean?
2a. What is the notwithstanding clause?
 b. When can it be invoked now?
 c. What is its relationship with the current consitution?
 d. What is its relationship with the charter of rights?
3. When could it be invoked if the accord is passed?

I thought that one of the major aims of the reform talks
was to obviate and somehow eliminate the notwithstanding clause.

????

Marc Riese
Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
Lausanne
From: nadeau@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Nadeau Jean-Claude)
Newsgroups: can.francais
Subject: Re: SOFTWARE=logiciel ?
Date: 2 Oct 92 14:19:36 GMT
Organization: Universite de Montreal

In article <1992Sep25.231228.24557@sobeco.com> alawrenc@sobeco.com writes:
>
>Oui, mais on utilise aussi le term 'progiciel' pour 'application software'.
>
	Le terme "progiciel" est plutot utilise pour "package".
From: beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Denis Beauregard)
Newsgroups: can.francais
Subject: Re: SOFTWARE=logiciel ?
Date: 2 Oct 92 17:50:26 GMT
Organization: Institut de recherche d'Hydro-Quebec, Varennes, Canada

In article <1992Oct2.141936.6633@cc.umontreal.ca> nadeau@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Nadeau Jean-Claude) writes:
>In article <1992Sep25.231228.24557@sobeco.com> alawrenc@sobeco.com writes:
>>
>>Oui, mais on utilise aussi le term 'progiciel' pour 'application software'.
>>
>	Le terme "progiciel" est plutot utilise pour "package".

J'ai toujours vu la difference entre logiciel et progiciel comme celle
entre un programme de petite envergure, developpe pour des besoins
plutot personnels ou dans le cadre d'un projet, et un programme de
plus grande envergure, developpe pour des besoins plus generaux
(traitement de texte, programme de comptabilite, compilateur).

Comme progiciels, je vois aussi l'ensemble du produit (le package?), mais
d'un produit dit commercial et non d'un ensemble d'outils developpes
de facon continue sans jamais avoir de produit final ou dont le produit
final ne servirait qu'une fois.

Un progiciel est un FIRMWARE selon moi, tout comme c'est un application
software ou un package.  Ce ne sont pas des definitions contradictoires
mais differentes facettes de la meme definition.

-- 
  \_\    Denis Beauregard  *  internet:beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca
 /   \   Genealogiste des familles : Beauregard/Jarret/Jarest/Vincent
J   __>  Un Quebec renouvele dans une Amerique renovee
\_.-===  Non a une entente au contenu secret      Mon opinion ? Non !
Newsgroups: can.canet.stats,tor.news.stats
Newsgroups: can.canet.stats
From: news@csri.toronto.edu (News user id)
Subject: utcsri nntp summary
Originator: root@yonge.csri.toronto.edu
Date: 28 Sep 92 04:01:35 GMT

NNTP log summary from Sep 27 00:01:23 to Sep 27 23:58:55

Article Reception        Offered      Took         Toss         Fail
Contacting Host           To Us    Total  Pct   Total  Pct   Total  Pct
psych                         2        2 100%       0   0%       0   0%
helios.physics               18       18 100%       0   0%       0   0%
newsflash                  9026       10   0%    9016 100%       0   0%
cs.ubc                       22       20  91%       2   9%       0   0%
gpu.utcs                     74       54  73%      20  27%       0   0%
utstat                       52        0   0%      52 100%       0   0%
rutgers                   13404     5216  39%    8188  61%       0   0%
bonnie                    32470     2454   8%   30016  92%       0   0%
usenet.rpi                12796    12378  97%     418   3%       0   0%
zoo                          68        2   3%      66  97%       0   0%
skule.ecf                    22       22 100%       0   0%       0   0%
------------------------- -----    ----------   ----------   ----------
TOTALS                    67954    20176  30%   47778  70%       0   0%
From: <news@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Subject: Manitoba News System Report
Originator: news@ccu.umanitoba.ca
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Distribution: can
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 13:20:36 GMT


System       	Accept	Reject	Junked	Xmit to	Control	% total	% rejct
access        	 27958	    58	   109	   2544	      0	    86%	     0%
alberta       	     0	     0	     0	     61	      0	     0%	     0%
bison         	     4	     0	     0	   5245	      0	     0%	     0%
bonnie        	  2507	  1424	   135	  26440	      0	    12%	    36%
ciit85        	     4	     0	     0	  28932	      0	     0%	     0%
local         	   233	     0	     0	      0	      0	     0%	     0%
mizar         	     0	     0	     0	      4	      0	     0%	     0%
mona          	     2	     0	     0	   7579	      0	     0%	     0%
newsflash     	   108	   145	     0	      0	      0	     0%	    57%
newton        	     1	     0	     0	      0	      0	     0%	     0%

TOTALS        	 30817	  1627	   244	  70805	      0	   100%	     5%

Total Articles processed 32444
Newsgroups: can.canet.stats
From: <root@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Subject: Manitoba NNTP Server Report
Originator: root@ccu.umanitoba.ca
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Distribution: can
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 13:00:20 GMT


NNTP peer article transfers

Article Reception (they contact us)
System                  Offered  Took  Toss  Fail Toss   Elapsed       CPU  Pct
newsflash.concordia.ca     3704    51  3653     0  99%  20:31:41   0:02:33   0%
mona.muug.mb.ca               1     1     0     0   0%   0:00:10   0:00:07  71%
access.usask.ca            4592  4514    78     0   2%   1:19:53   0:07:36  10%
ciit85.ciit.nrc.ca            3     3     0     0   0%   0:00:08   0:00:03  38%
bonnie.concordia.ca       17378  2127 15251     0  88%  23:55:04   0:17:41   1%

TOTALS                    25678  6696 18982     0  74%  45:46:58   0:28:02   1%

Article Transmission (we contact them)
System                    Offrd  Took  Toss  Fail  Pct   Elapsed       CPU  Pct
mona.muug.mb.ca             948   948     0     0   0%   0:04:24   0:00:27  10%
access.usask.ca             172   166     6     0   3%   0:03:02   0:00:06   3%
scapa.cs.ualberta.ca          9     1     8     0  89%   0:00:53   0:00:02   4%
ciit85.ciit.nrc.ca         4050  4050     0     0   0%   2:08:30   0:02:14   2%
bonnie.concordia.ca        6750  2032  4717     1  70%  15:50:56   0:03:31   0%
mizar.cc.umanitoba.ca        12    12     0     0   0%   0:00:19   0:00:02  12%

TOTALS                    11941  7209  4731     1  40%  18:08:08   0:06:23   1%

Transmission Connection Attempts         ------errors-------
System                     Conn    OK    NS   Net   Rmt  Pct
mona.muug.mb.ca              33    33     0     0     0   0%
access.usask.ca              45    18     0    27     0  60%
scapa.cs.ualberta.ca          8     8     0     0     0   0%
ciit85.ciit.nrc.ca           48    48     0     0     0   0%
bonnie.concordia.ca           1     1     0     0     0   0%
mizar.cc.umanitoba.ca        12    12     0     0     0   0%

TOTALS                      147   120     0    27     0  18%

Server timeouts
pollux.cc.umanitoba.ca        1
silver.cs.umanitoba.ca        1
next02.cc.umanitoba.ca        1

Newsgroups: can.canet.stats,tor.news.stats