HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: williamf@umbc5.umbc.edu (TheBigBopper)
Subject: Re: Presidential debates #2
Organization: Univ. of MD, Baltimore County
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 23:28:31 GMT

In article <1992Oct16.211847.13625@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>
 mulac@daystrom.lerc.nasa.gov (Richard Mulac) writes:
>"Um, what did those handlers say, Uh .. Oh, yeah .. take ten steps into the
>crowd .. one, two, .. suck up to the questioner .. Whew .. take ten steps
>back.  OK, now my handlers said that when the red light goes on on the
>camera in front of Bush which has me in the background I should shake my
>head no when Bush is speaking.  Let's see .. left . right . left . right.
>Boy, that one girl in the third row is cute.  I'll see if she wants my
>autograph afterwards"

  Uh, tricky Dick, are you having flashbacks?  Ronald Reagan last ran in 
  1984, you know.  Remember him?  the actor fella, the one w/o a brain...
      
===
   Vote Yes on Prop. Six - keep the right of choice alive for Maryland women.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
   con-ser-va-tive: adj. 1. tending to preserve established institutions,
   etc; opposed to change 2. -n a conservative person 3. -n a redneck, a
   racist, a bigot 4. any of Duke, Helms, Buchanan, Helms, Seymour, Thurmond,
   Bush  5. use:  a faggot-loving, gun control freak, equal rights for crips
   and non-whites, pro-abortion, anti-hang the niggers, almost-pinko is not
   a conservative.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=




Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: korman@seas.gwu.edu (John Korman)
Subject: Re: I will vote for Clinton if ...  [REPOST]
Organization: George Washington University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 22:23:22 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.205054.27002@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> mulac@daystrom.lerc.nasa.gov (Richard Mulac) writes:
>
>ALL I WANT IS A DEFINITIVE
>
>      "NO ONE MAKING < $200,000 WILL HAVE TO PAY MORE IN TAXES"
>
>Give me this and you'll have me and others on the net marching to
>the polls for Clinton in November.  If you don't come up with a direct

Just my humble advice:

CAUTION: SLIPPERY WHEN CLINTON.


Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu (Greg Trotter)
Subject: Re: I will vote for Clinton if ...  [REPOST]
Originator: news@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 22:58:58 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Gallifrey - Home of the Timelords

In article <1992Oct14.204514.28525@umbc3.umbc.edu> alex@engr3.umbc.edu (alex) writes:
>In article <1992Oct14.162909.6653@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>, greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu (Greg Trotter) writes:
>
>|> Agreed! Let's drop the cost of health care by dropping the threat of
>|> medical litigation... oops, sorry. For a moment, I forgot that Clinton
>|> supports the trial laywers and their movement to ensure that we spend
>|> our dollars in the hospital instead of the court.
>
>	Tort reform is a great idea, but it's hardly a universial cure.
>Denying people the right to sue an incompetant or fraudulant doctor is
>never going to sit well with the public, so any tort reform idea is
>only going to be able to cut a small portion of the lawsuits. 

Nobody (but you, so far) is equating tort reform with denying rights.
I don't want to deny your right to legal recourse in the event of
malpractice; I merely want to make sure you get more than your lawyer
does.

>
>	Since a major problem with malpractice claims is the settlement
>amounts for legitimate grievances, it's going to be necessary to put
>caps on the amount that once can sue for. I doubt that the federal 
>government can do that, given that the right to sue is a constitional
>one.

Again, your right to sue will not be infringed. Several states have put
caps on the amount someone can sue for in a particular case. It's been
put to the test.

>	I'm willing to bet that the Bush tort reform act is a whole lot
>wimpier then they make it out to be, either that or it will never pass,
>even if Bush did win in November.

I doubt that. We've got hundreds of seats up for grabs in Congress, and
there is a substantial anti-incumbent mood in America. Bush may have
problems passing legislation to help America and it's economy if he
faces a Democratic Congress (like he has lately with the much-needed
capital gains tax), but who knows what'll happen next month?

							- greg
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections
From: joec@fid.morgan.com (Joe Collins)
Subject: Re: The Federal Debt
Organization: None
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 00:12:39 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.051507.4080@ncsu.edu> delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE) writes:
>
>  I really liked Ross Perot's 30 minute talk about our economy.
me too...The next ones are on Friday night.

>  The reason why I am voting for Clinton is that he has a better
>  strategy for taking on the problems at hand.
Please detail that...

>  If Ross Perot were elected president, he would only last four years.
Why?

>  He would run the country like a business, cutting social programs to
>  the bare bone, 
to pay the debt - fine with me. Social programs are nice but overdone
plus we cannot afford it.

>while raising taxes. Sure, it would fix the defecit problem, but it 
>would kill the American people.
Which people? Have you read his book UNITED WE STAND? he wants to spread
the pain all around.

>  Clinton, on the other hand, favors a gradual solution to the problem
>  at hand. I do believe that he is truly the man to solve our problems.
Perot also favors a fairly gradual approach. Specifically, he would
activate his plan by 1/1/94, at the earliest.

>delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu

I respect your opinion but I dont trust Democrats (ask Gov Florio why).

I will likely vote for Perot since he has a very specific plan in mind
and has spelled it out. I agree with it almost completely.

Joe
joec@morgan.com


Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections
From: wdstarr@athena.mit.edu (William December Starr)
Subject: Re: GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
Organization: Northeastern Law, Class of '93
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 12:36:53 GMT


In article <1992Oct14.173634.29560@midway.uchicago.edu>, 
shou1@cicero.spc.uchicago.edu (Roger Shouse) said:

> Sorry, I heard all the arguments you list back in the 60's and 70's.
> The government of South Vietnam had the legitimacy of not
> representing a totalitarian ideal.  That Vietnamese would have voted
> for Ho in the 50's simply suggests that they hadn't yet learned
> enough about the guy to make a good decision.

Interesting view of democracy: "That Americans would have voted for
<Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe,... Kennedy, Johnson,
Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush>... simply suggests that they hadn't yet
learned enough about the guy to make a good decision."  And also would
have justified another nation's sending troops into America to make
sure that the American voters never got the chance to make that awful
mistake?

> In any event, people can argue back and forth about this.  We
> needn't try to change each others minds about the war.  The point
> is, however, that I suspect that Bill Clinton agrees with you --
> that a Communist led Vietnam was better for the people of that
> country than the potential democratic alternative.

You may suspect whatever you wish, sir.

-- William December Starr <wdstarr@athena.mit.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush
From: athos@apple.com (Rick Eames)
Subject: Re: Bush- a sleazy scumbag!
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 21:57:02 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.
Followup-To: alt.politics.bush

In article <Oct.9.11.03.50.1992.6983@gandalf.rutgers.edu>,
shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan) wrote:

> Since I already ranted about this in an earlier post, I won't do it 
> again.  All I can say is if this is how you see things perhaps you
> should clean your glasses or get your eyes checked.  You would
> flunk miserably in detective school.  You connect things that do 
> not connect, hear things that people don't say, and filter your
> information through your own warped preconceptions before 
> coming to a warped conclusion.  Feeding you information and
> receiving a conclusion is kind of like playing a record on a phonograph
> with a bad needle.

I'm not reading anything into anything.  Here are some examples of "Clinton
Answers":

Q: Did you ever take drugs?
A: I have never broken the laws of this country.  
(This doesn't answer the question, but it *is* technically correct)

Q: Did you ever take drugs?
A: I experimented, but didn't inhale.
(To quote Billy Crystal: come on!)

Add to this the "I never lead protests" to "I did help put together the
teach in" to "I have written and spoken and marched against the
war...organized protests" to "???".   

The point here is ANSWER THE DAMNED QUESTION.  Don't dick around with these
clever little answers that bite you on the butt later on.
--
Rick Eames
athos@apple.com
My opinions are my own, thank you very much!
HERSCHENSOHN for US Senate.  Just say "No" to 6 years of Boxer!
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis)
Subject: Re: Where will Bush want to have his library ? Maine or Texas
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 15:24:08 GMT
Organization: Austerlitz, Gershovitz, and Carmichael

Min Zhao writes:
>
>   Next year, the Bush Presidential Library will need to be built. My 
>question is, where will Bush want the library be built ?  Texas or Maine  
> 
>   
Barring a pardon from President Clinton or President Perot I think
the prison library at Danbury will do just fine. [Hint: obstruction of 
justice for supressing evidence in the current Atlanta Iraq-loan trial.]
-- 
Jeff Davis <davis@keats.ca.uky.edu> No one -- from sea to shining sea -- 
can tell us why we are having all this trouble with our Republic.
From: loeb@ai.mit.edu (Eric Loeb)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush
Subject: FROM BUSH HQ
Date: 13 Oct 92 15:39:27 GMT

Newsgroups: alt.politics.elections, alt.politics.usa.misc, talk.politics.misc

This is a test of the Bush auto-posting network.

If this had been an actual post, it might have said
something interesting.

Xref: sparky alt.politics.bush:8658 alt.politics.clinton:9751
From: djp002@acad.drake.edu
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: Bush- a sleazy scumbag!
Date: 11 Oct 92 22:19:12 GMT
Followup-To: Bush- a sleazy scumbag!
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA

In article <92281.231404RAJA@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>, <RAJA@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> writes:
> I could not believe what our Pres. (It chokes in my throat) bush said about Cli
> nton's trip to Moscow . He said it was not understandable that someone went the
> re one year after the invasion of Czechoslovakia and that Clinton had not level
> ed with the American people.
> 
> I am so angry I could spit. A Trip made when you are a student and that is Anti
> -american!!? This man (Bush) is a total disgrace to the  Presidency and is livi
> ng up to his statement to do anything to win election. Let us throw this bum ou
> t as far as one can throw. If any Republican with honor can defend this behavio
> ur then one can't be angry but only pity.
> 
> Disgusting( I am too mad to think of anything else to say)!
> 
> rajagopalan.......Throw Mr.Bum Bush and his Moron No.2 out in the Cold come Jan
> 1993.
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.perot
From: jerry@cs.mcgill.ca (Gerald (Jerry) KUCH)
Subject: Re: The Games Are Basically Over, and Clinton Will Win BIG!!
Organization: McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 15:04:35 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.143453.1649@cnsvax.uwec.edu> falknemj@cnsvax.uwec.edu writes:
>
>    This election will end with much turnover, and it will start at the top.  I
>still believe that Ross Perot has the best ideas, but I no longer believe he
>can win.  I believe that the voting, at this point, shall turn into no more
>than a mere formality of what we have been seeing over the course of the last 8
>weeks; Clinton with sizable leads nearly everywhere.
>
>    When all the votes are counted, Clinton will win, Bush will lose, and Perot
>will have wasted his time.  I'd say it may be in Perot's best interests not to
>bother going on with what the Americans voters now see is a charade.

Perot may not have entirely wasted his time... it's not clear that 
megalomania is his sole motivation.  The presence of one more voice in the
debates, spewing fairly focussed anti-Bush rhetoric can only reinforce
Clinton's words.  Especially when Perot's homey charm has captured as many
as it had last summer.  The notion of a "populist billionaire" still cracks
me up though.

>    This IS NOT a Clinton endorsement; just a statement of political reality. 
>Bill Clinton, with a Democratic Congress, scares me, but I know now that that
>is probably what we are going to have for the next four years.

Althogh Uncle George keeps talking about a big changing of the guard in the
Congress.  I wonder if he'll get it....  WRONG!

>    Bill Clinton will be the next President of the United States; accept it.

Probably.  Unless he fumbles something really badly in the next few weeks.
It is about time though that the Republicans stop getting elected by default.

>						Mike Falkner
>						falknemj@cnsvax.uwec.edu


-- 
 Jerry Kuch (jerry@cs.mcgill.ca) ----- SOMETHING NEAT SHOULD GO HERE.
 "I was wrong to play God.  Life is precious, not a thing to be toyed with.
  Now take out that brain and flush it down the toilet."
                  --- M. Burns  "Treehouse of Horror II"
Xref: sparky alt.politics.bush:9545 alt.politics.clinton:11057 alt.politics.elections:17382
From: chrisb@natinst.com (Chris Bartz)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections
Subject: Re: PDII - strike two on Bush
Date: 16 Oct 92 19:15:39 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: National Instruments, Austin, TX
NNTP-Posting-Host: eagle.natinst.com

In article <1992Oct16.154619.10756@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> cah@tyr.JPL.NASA.gov (Allen Halsell) writes:
>In article <1992Oct16.051854.19291@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>, mulac@daystrom.lerc.nasa.gov (Richard Mulac) writes:
>> 
>> Two questions.  
>> Will Perot find some way to replace his running mate before the election 
>> (Colin Powell would wrap it up for him)?
>
>How exactly will this work?  Stockdale is on the ballot in CA; Powell is
>not.  Besides, what's so great about Powell, really?  A great resume?
>Do you know anything about him besides how he looks?
>

Actually, neither are on the ballot - Perot/Stockdale electors are on the
ballot.  You vote for which candidates electors you want.  I think these
electors could vote for anybody they wanted to.  Presumably Perot picked
them because they would vote for him and his running mate.  I had heard
that some states require the electors to vote for who they were suppose
to but if Perot told them to vote for someone else (like Powell) for
VP I think they could.

-- 
-chris bartz (chrisb@natinst.com)
Xref: sparky alt.politics.bush:9503 alt.politics.clinton:11003 alt.politics.elections:17323 alt.rush-limbaugh:7641
From: isbell@ai.mit.edu (Charles L Isbell)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: More democrats in congress?
Date: 16 Oct 92 17:42:23 GMT
	<1992Oct14.225858.16983@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
	<1992Oct15.034149.11160@umbc3.umbc.edu>
	<1992Oct15.122120.5554@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
	<1992Oct15.193538.1873@umbc3.umbc.edu>
Followup-To: alt.politics.bush
Distribution: usa
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
In-reply-to: alex@engr3.umbc.edu's message of 15 Oct 92 19:35:38 GMT

alex@engr3.umbc.edu (alex) writes:
||> >	Sorry bud, but it looks like we're not only looking at a
||> >democratic congress, but we're looking at *more* democrats in the
||> >Senate and a continuing majority in the house. It's a good thing 
||> >Bush won't have to deal with that, huh?
||> 
||> More demos? Where did you get that from?

	   looking at the local polls around the country, I would predict a
|gain in house seats by Republicans, and a gain of senate seats by Democrats.
|California, for example, is looking *very* democratic this year, and will 
|send two democrats to the senate and a whole bunch to the house. I expect
|to see 60 or 61 Democratic seats in the next senate.

The important thing about all this is that the Dems have a chance at
getting a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.

Well!

--
Peace.
               "'Sex without love is an empty experience.'
                'Yes, but as empty experiences go, it's one of the best.'
                             - Diane Keaton and Woody Allen
                                   -\--/-
    Don't just adopt opinions     |  \/  |       Some of you are homeboys
          develop them.           |  /\  | but only I am The Homeboy From hell
                                   -/--\-

Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections
From: mister rogers <rogers@ial3.jsc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Bush's Veto
X-Xxdate: Tue, 13 Oct 92 18:52:22 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Engineering
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:06:49 GMT

if you think your cable company is charging too much for the service you
receive, there is a better alternative to regulation.

call them and cancel. tell them why you cancelled.
your payment for TV service will be lower this way.

-------------
mister rogers
-------------
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: lyman@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Kenneth Casey)
Subject: Re: Where will Bush want to have his library ? Maine or Texas
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 16:20:22 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.150035.26288@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> mzhao@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Min Zhao) writes:
>
>   Next year, the Bush Presidential Library will need to be built. My 
>question is, where will Bush want the library be built ?  Texas or Maine  
> 
>   



	I think the people of the U.S. should put it in one of the


vacant downtown storefronts in Detroit. If we hang on a while GM headquarters
may be available!
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.perot,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics
From: kauffman@slab.unt.edu (DON KAUFFMAN)
Subject: Re: VOTE FOR ONE OF THE THREE CANDIDATES PARTICIPATING IN DEBATE B-4 DEBATE!!
Summary: Poll on pres. candidates
Keywords: poll,clinton,perot,bush,vote,debate
Organization: School of Library & Info Sci, UNT
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 20:37:36 GMT

In article <Bvuyus.5po@csn.org> kenw@teal.csn.org (Ken Waletzki) writes:
>Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.perot,
alt.politics.pclinton,alt.politics

	HEY!  What happened to alt.politics.clinton?

>Subject: VOTE FOR ONE OF THE THREE CANDIDATES PARTICIPATING IN DEBATE B-4 DEBATE!!
>Summary:  Poll on pres. candidates
>Keywords: poll,clinton,perot,bush,vote,debate

	I see that you've spelled "Clinton" correctly here.

>VOTE for one of the candidates participating in this Sunday's debate.
>I will post results after Sunday's debate:

	Please post your survey in alt.politics.clinton,
	if you have not already done so.  Thanks.

>Ken Waletzki Consulting, 2525 Arapahoe #E4-107, Boulder, Colorado  80302
>303-494-8953, email kenw@csn.org

						Don Kauffman
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush
From: aberman@cs.washington.edu (Andrew Berman)
Subject: Re: Too Close for Comfort
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 21:01:24 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.193218.1993@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> cah@tyr.JPL.NASA.gov (Allen Halsell) writes:
>"Bill Clinton."  Actually I'm enjoying myself tremendously.  Now the
>Republicans know how so many Democrats have felt for the last 12
>years ... as far as Bush pulling it out, don't hold your breath.
>I've been there; it's hopeless.  I suggest you put it aside and start
>thinking about Jack Kemp to make yourself feel better.
>
>Any other Dems out there feeling unexplained emotional highs from
>time to time?
"Bill Clinton."
"Bill Clinton."
"Bill Clinton."
hee hee hee, I'm enjoying myself too.

Here's something to stir the pot and antagonize the Bushies....

Bill Clinton as President.

All those agencies in Washington being headed by Democrats.

All those federal judgeships being filled with Democrats.

Laurence Tribe, followed by Mario Cuomo on the Supreme Court.

A repeal of the Gag Rule.

A more progressive tax rate.

No more official discrimination against homosexuals in the military.

RU-486 available in the United States.

The term "conservative" being looked on with the same disdain that
the term "liberal" is looked on with today.

YEARS AND YEARS OF A DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT/CONGRESS!!

What will America look like in 2 or 3 years, folks?  I can't wait.

Hee hee hee.



Andrew Berman

-- 
Andrew P. Berman           |  "This election is about who's going to be the
Dept. of Computer Science  |  next President of the United States!"
University of Washington   |    --Dan Quayle, 1988 
aberman@cs.washington.edu  |
From: VIGNESWA@ecs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush
Subject: Did you notice....?
Date: 7 Oct 1992 16:42:34 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

	Last night Mr Perot was in his 30 minutes campaign commercial (or
program).  He presented a chart showing  the GNP.  Guess who led the list
in last 20 years...   The rubber stamp president!  The one who had ruling
Democratic Congress and "just signed" all the  bills.  Jimmy Carter's era
was the best.  After Carter, Regan days were not bad. Bush?  Oh! Not even
close.  Mr Perot said (paraphased)  'It was trickle-down economy.  But it
didn't trickle'.  The best three GNP in the last four decades were during
Kenndy, Johnson and Carter terms.  True!  Whenever a Democratic President
and Democratic Congress were together the GNP was at the top.

	Can someone give more info with the actual figures?

Thanks,

V: 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Subject: Re: I will vote for Clinton if ...
Keywords: significant words from a document used as an index to content
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 15:32:51 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.055450.29144@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> StarOwl@uiuc.edu writes:
>sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>: In article <BvwtBI.EDw@news.cso.uiuc.edu> StarOwl@uiuc.edu writes:
>: >sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>: >
>: >: I had this dream that Clinton was President, the Internationale was
>: >: played at his inaguration.
>: >
>: >I hear tell that Bush wants 'Deutschland, Deutschland ueber alles'
>: >played at his inauguration should he be re-elected.
>: >
>: Now that's silly, why would an American President want a German anthem
>: played at his inaguration.                 :)
>
>Probably for a similar reason as an American President wanting a Communist
>anthem played at his inauguration.  :)

Look at Clinton's policies and you'll know why the Internationale is
appropriate            :)
>
>: There will be ice floes on the River Styx if Clinton becomes President.
>
>*shrug*  I hear that Hell is a rather chilly place these days.

Not as chilly as our houses will be when CLinton's energy policies leave
us out in the COLD during the winter of 93/94.        :)


Simon
_______________________________________________________________________
"Liberals are but cockroaches before us!!!"-- Doktor S.

>
>--
>Michael Adams (aka StarOwl)	 		"Republicans understand the
>Internet:  StarOwl@uiuc.edu			 importance of bondage between
>Bitnet:    FREE1217@UIUCVMD			 parent and child."
>Anonymous: wi.5467@n7kbt.rain.com			-- Dan Quayle
>UUCP:      ...!uiucuxc!uiuc.edu!StarOwl
>
>Marrou/Lord in '92
>
>
>