HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:53:37 GMT

maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:

>In article <katherim.727666304@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>|There IS a difference, trust me.  Watch who you are flaming, or you may
>|find the combined wrath of all Welsh, Scottish and Irish upon your head.

>Yeh, you canadians would know wouln't you?

Yes, we would.  Why do you think our ancestors came here?  To get as far as
possible away from idiocy you call a country and the french, german and
Italian mishmash you call a culture.

 

>Silly bitch.

Such flaming finesse.  Such mastery of the tongue.  Such noble language.
(Sneer)  Such garbage.
One line flames are your thing aren't they Graley?  You might at least
learn to do them well.

>~THE GREAT NAME

>-- 
>    Don't worry,
>     Its like in the comic books...
>      ITS NOT REAL!
From: tilden@caravan.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Enjoy the silence while we can, I feel KEN's Presense is near.
Date: 21 Jan 1993 11:30:44 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: caravan.ksu.ksu.edu


Wonder where blunder mutt is, I need more fertilizer for in my greenhouse.

Tilden

PS Ken is small and warrents no respect.
From: king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: 22 Jan 93 20:20:52 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine

In article <1jigrqINNhfp@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>In article <C135wC.J4y@world.std.com> rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) 
>writes:
>>I notice, however, that the lack of interesting material certainly
>>doesn't stop you from your usual brand of incredibly insipid bleat-
>>ings, Liz, dear.  
>
>And your proof is?  Please, post it for all to see.

Anyone who read the last dozen or so articles posted by you already has
seen all the necessary proof, Lizzie darling.

>Anybody with half a brain (and this obviously does not include you) knows
>that any newsgroup with the word "flame" in its title is not going to be
>a breeding ground for intelligent discussions.  

It used to be. That is, before you came along.

>This has nothing to do with the intelligence levels of those posting, 

It very well could have a lot to do with just that, don't you know?

>but more with the nature of the newsgroup and the attitudes of the posters.  

Not necessarily. Alt.flame is what we make it. The attitudes of the posters
will alter the nature of the newsgroup and vice-versa. The two are
intimately intertwined. Shut up and watch for a while - you'll see.

>Alt.flame isn't here for discussion purposes, 

It could be, if given a chance. It really doesn't matter what you, in
particular, thinks it's for; it can be whatever anybody wants. This is
anarchy, understand?

>you ignorant slut, it's here for flaming anyone and everyone who posts here, 
>along with their mothers.  

It doesn't have to be. At least we now have positive proof of the reasons
why YOU are here. 

>That's why it is a _flame_ news group.  

You are not the creator or the moderator of this group, so you have no
place telling anyone what it is for. You are entitled to your opinions,
lame though they may be, but you have no right, and certainly no
qualifications, to preach to anyone about anything. 

>If you want intelligent conversation, go to some comp group.  Duh.

Like what,comp.os.windows? HA HA HA HA HA!! (oxymoronic newsgroup name)

Actually, what Liz is trying to say is, "If you want intelligent
conversation, don't talk to me!"


-- 
                       Se non e` vero, e` ben trovato 
     ...{utzoo|mnetor}!dciem!dretor!king        king@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Macho 1 - Women 0. Moana is down (for now...)
Date: 24 Jan 93 04:23:29 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <35750@olympus.wustl.edu>, moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
>>dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>>>P.S.	And now let me work, that I have a family to pay for...
>>>	(you know what it means in italian, right Moana?)
>>
>>Yes, I know. How many toilets did you clean for your wife's new furcoat 
>>(christmas present)? It was very expensive (because of the wideness)?
>>
>>Moana.
> 
> OK, OK, I APOLOGIZE for what I've written. I didn't mean it.
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! She *DID*! She *DID*! HA HA HA HA HA HA 
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MOANA, I can't belive you! My little love, how could you do 
that?!?!? YOU DID APOLOGIZE!!!! For such a lame! Unbelivable!

You did not learn anyhting, that's bad. My darling, you are 
one that told me that I could not deal with the fire, and 
you did apologyze for two raws of bullshit! 

You mist the rule #1 of the good flamer:
WHATEVER YOU SAY, WHATEVER YOU THINK, *NEVER* APOLOGIZE.

How can I do with you, now? I was speaking about *free rape*, 
and you *lost* the war for a *toilet*. Tsk, tsk, tsk, tsk.

You destroyed all my good job. SHIT! (Jason, read and learn).
> 
> As I've explained to somebody in private e-mail, my sentence was ironic
> and was trying to hit Michele's simplicistic ideas of life (beautiful
> women, here on the earth just to be f***ed, and so on)...

And you have not be able to deal with it. Did you think that 
it was easy for me to support a Macho-flame?!? With the fire 
that arrived from *everywhere*? No, but I did. I started it, 
I had to deal with it. Even if everybody thought that I am a 
cave-man (they still think that, but who cares?), it was a 
game. And you lost for, for ... I CAN'T BELIVE THAT! 
 
> ... well, I realize that I didn't succeed in this: I'm SORRY.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

And now for all the morons in this FUCKING NET:

That is the proof that I did not want to continue the macho-
war because it was getting to much hard for somebody *else*.

I know what I wrote (a big amount of bullshit) and I knew 
that I could hurt somebody. I will never apologyze for 
nothing, instead to apologyze I raise the fire, even if I 
sound bad. I don't like to loose. I won. Sorry guys, shit
happens, and I did not want to see such a bullshit.

> Moana.

	Michele
> 
> PS: follows up to alt.non-sequitur.
> 
what the fuck does it mean?1?
> 
P.S. 	I would like to know who is the moron that sent you a 
	private e-mail telling that you wrote something 
	bad. There is something wrong on this. Here there is
	people unable to think that *often* alt.flame is not real.
From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: End of term assignment for "The Phantom"
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 14:18:02 GMT
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
> In article <1993Jan20.112605.25110@fcom.cc.utah.edu>, cc4507@u.cc.utah.edu
> (Chucki Carpinello) writes:
> > In article <C14J89.5F6@world.std.com> martin@world.std.com (Martin J
> > Hannigan) writes:
> > >
> > >Chuck, you are a faggot.
> > 
> > WOW!  How preceptive of you.
> 
> You didn't deny the accousation... so perhaps it _was_ perceptive...

Well, Big Chief I-Spy, here is Chucki Carpinello's .signature, taken straight
(geddit?!) from the posting you replied to:

> -- 
> "When will you understand that I am a person and not some thing?
>  That I deserve to be treated like a person and not some thing??"
>                                                 __      -Madonna
> Chucki Carpinello                               \/

                                                 ^^^^

Now, can you see a shape there?  One with three sides?  Now, you're posting
from Drake University in Iowa, so think back to your advanced math course and
tell me: What do we call a shape with three sides?

Yes!  Well done!  It's a triangle!

Now for a history test.  Which famous person ordered that a group of people
be tattooed with pink triangles and marched off to the gas chambers?

Yes!  Well done!  It was Adolf Hitler!  I thought you'd know that name.

Now for the tricky bit.  Your end of term assignment is:  What sort of people
wear downwards-pointing pink triangles as a political statement about their
oppression in American society?

Now, I realise that there are some tricky words in that question, but I'm sure
if you ask around you'll find someone who can tell you what it means.

For a bonus mark -- and if spotting the triangle was hard for you, this one
might be even trickier -- work out how I knew you were posting from Drake
University.


mathew
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Phantom Exposed: His real name is Vinson Scott Goddard!
Date: 27 Jan 93 18:32:52 GMT
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA

In article <C1HxrC.Mps@world.std.com>, martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan) writes:

> Fuck off loser. Stop running around the net crying. Waa Waa Waa. Screw.

In yet ANOTHER display of searing intellect, Mr. HandtoBalls adds to our
ever-increasing lexicon of "Failed Wit and Logic" Retorts such as "Fuck off
loser" and "Waa Waa Waa" finishing off this incredibly revealing sentence with
"Screw". WHAT A COMMAND OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE!! Ladies and Gentleman, I give
you the incredibly cluless, the ever so confused, the profoundly profane: MR.
MARTIN HANDTOBALLS!! 

"Let the Dream Begin, Let your Darker side give in..."

--The Phantom
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Shut the fuck up, Moaner.
Date: 26 Jan 1993 18:22:25 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk
Keywords: Love's Arrow

In article <C1G6y6.86r@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
|(Mr J S Graley) writes:
|
|  [ more slander against my fair fiancee, Katherine deleted... ]
|
|Hey you vapid, little, weasel with the reasoning ability of a used
|wad of chewing gum, I've just about had it with your foul mouthed
|abuse.
|
|I know this is the most attention you've had from a real woman
|in your entire life, but Katherine is TAKEN, you retched little priapatic
|pustule.
|
|You oughta be tied up buck nekkid and dragged through the sage brush for
|talking to a lady that way, you rancid pre-pubescent little snot.
|
|Katherine, I'm sorry you had to hear this.

tee hee. 'rancid'. wow.

|-- Andy  

~THE GREAT NAME
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: afrolik@ub.d.umn.edu (Ed Olczyk)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Who is this Andy Fuck-up?
Date: 25 Jan 93 16:39:45 GMT
Distribution: alt
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ub.d.umn.edu

In article <C18rE6.JAF@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>(Scott Erickson) writes:
{Mr. Erickson's remarks/observations deleted}
{concerning the quality of posts in alt.flame}
>
>But thanks ever so much for sharing your enlightened opinion with us.
>I'll certainly be expecting great things from you in the future now that
>I know you have such high standards of excellence.

You fucking idiot.  The posts Mr. Erickson was speaking of are the ones like
all of yours.  I come on here to read some good flames and all I get is 20000
andy fucking shit for brains hart posts.  What a moron.  You babble
incessantly about nothing and you make me go through all your goddamn posts
to see if there's anything good to read.  Please send replies to these people
and don't clutter this group with your brains. {see 3rd line above}  Good
luck in your search.  I'm sure you will find a life soon.
>
>Please.  Do share some examples of what you would adequate flammage with
>the rest of us.

I am quite sure that Mr. Erickson's posts will top your posts in quality any
time.  From what I have seen, Mr. Erickson apparently puts thought into his
posts and actually says something, while you, on the other hand, post
mindless babble.
>
>I await with baited breath.

Somehow, I believe that should read bated breath, as in masturbated, because
I am sure that you are an expert in that field.
-- 
Tony Frolik                                        afrolik@ua.d.umn.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Date: 22 Jan 1993 17:19:49 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <katherim.727666304@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
|There IS a difference, trust me.  Watch who you are flaming, or you may
|find the combined wrath of all Welsh, Scottish and Irish upon your head.

Yeh, you canadians would know wouln't you?

>KMM

Silly bitch.

~THE GREAT NAME

-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: A song for Moana and all the women...
Date: 25 Jan 93 14:36:16 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

This is a piece of a *good* venetian song that I dedicate to 
sweetheart Moana:

...
So mato par aaa mooona, 
	pi mato dei cavai!
...
Honda, kavasaky, yamaha e enduro
	Rambo, Cicciolina, Moana meo fa duro!
...
		Pitura Freska
	(reggae from Venice, the city of Casanova)

Translation:

...
I'm crazy for the puuusy,
	crazier than the horsies!
...
Honda, kavasaky, yamaha and enduro
        Rambo, Cicciolina, Moana make *it* hard!
....

He,he,he, he... Enjoy!

    Obviously:
	Michele
From: Kevin Walsh <kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Date: 25 Jan 93 11:14:18 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <katherim.727666304@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
> There IS a difference, trust me.  Watch who you are flaming, or you may
> find the combined wrath of all Welsh, Scottish and Irish upon your head.
> 
Who?

Pah!

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     Professor Kevin Walsh
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Macho 1 - Women 0. Moana is down (for now...)
Date: 24 Jan 93 21:32:29 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1993Jan24.042329.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <35750@olympus.wustl.edu>, moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
>>>dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>
>You mist the rule #1 of the good flamer:
>WHATEVER YOU SAY, WHATEVER YOU THINK, *NEVER* APOLOGIZE.

No.  That is a good rule for alt.flame, but the number one rule is
"Post something intelligent, lest ye be pasted like a sphincter."
Here is the rule you need to learn, fool.

>You destroyed all my good job. SHIT! (Jason, read and learn).

A tree-sloth could destroy your pathetic flames.

>And you have not be able to deal with it. Did you think that 
>it was easy for me to support a Macho-flame?!? 

No.  It's just easy for you to ignore the scathing replies you have gotten,
and pretend that you haven't been made a fool of.  Really, Michelina, if 
you didn't have such a lump of lead for a brain you would have run out
of alt.flame with you head up your ass long ago.

Instead, you remain posting with your head up your ass, and you are held
unilaterally to be stupid.

>And now for all the morons in this FUCKING NET:
>
>That is the proof that I did not want to continue the macho-
>war because it was getting to much hard for somebody *else*.

Oh, believe me, on behalf of the net, it is never hard to deal with you.
Maybe Moana can't take it, I felt she has done a pretty good job displaying
you for the large mass of felchball that you are.  Obviously, she thinks 
she needed to apologize.

I'm sorry too, that is, I'm sorry you are such a moron.

>
>I know what I wrote (a big amount of bullshit) and I knew 
>that I could hurt somebody.  

You only fuck yourself, michelina.
I will never apologyze for 
>nothing,
Maybe you will learn to spell?

 instead to apologyze I raise the fire, even if I 
>sound bad. I don't like to loose. I won. Sorry guys, shit
>happens, and I did not want to see such a bullshit.

You are the living testament to the fact that shit happens.

>
>> Moana.
>
>	Michele
>> 
>> PS: follows up to alt.non-sequitur.
>> 
>what the fuck does it mean?1?

This should be your .sig.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Phantom Exposed: His real name is Vinson Scott Goddard!
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 17:43:15 GMT

In article <C1JL9q.21n@world.std.com>, martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan) writes:

> Thanks to Graley I have a hand and balls to inter connect.

HOW TRUE!!! Thanks to Graley, you have had your hands and balls
interconnecting!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!! Martin, you fool!! Martin, you moron!!! 

"Floating, falling, sweet intoxication..."

> SUCK MY SIGNATURE FUCKWAD (tm) (c) <=== pay attention Michele...

Now stop that! I adamantly REFUSE to suck *anything* of yours Martin, no matter
how nicely you ask. You should really stop to find dates here, someone might
notice! 

--The Phantom
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Intellectuals & women
Date: 24 Jan 93 21:45:06 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1993Jan24.061211.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <1993Jan24.091306.12344@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan24.014919.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>
>
>You started to tell me that I really hated woman for what I 
>wrote. i
Oh, well many of us think that raping and beating women constitutes a 
dislike of them.  I guess that just the way it works in your tiny
furteenth century mind.

Bullshit. I know the women better than what you can 
>think, I respect women more than what you can think, just 
>because I am not really sexist, how you pretend to show.

No.  You are a sexist.  By the textbook definition.  Show your crap to any
woman, they will tell you the same thing.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Intellectuals & women
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 21:55:04 GMT

In article <1993Jan24.061211.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <1993Jan24.091306.12344@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan24.014919.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>
>It is you that are not able to realize that on this world 
>there are not only your intellectual friends,

Yes, that's true there are pre-pubescent imbecile coozes like yourself.


 as cold as you
Enough of this cold shit, you do not know the meaning of cold.
Cold is raping and beating women.  Look in the mirror.  Nobody who
know me personally will ever say that I am cold, so you can just 
fuck off.

 
>that masturbate their mind thinking " How Gosh, how much I 
>am intellectual, how Gosh, how much I am cool, how Gosh, how 
>much I am deep and romantic". 

For all the time you spend stroking yourself, you should know something 
about masturbation.
I also have to talk about your intellectual remark.  I am in no way,
and intellectual.  I know many people who I would consider intellectual, and I                                                                                  and I am not one.  But I forget, compared to you, everyone looks intellectual.



 Yes, so much romantic that 
>there is not space on your hearth for one sweet experience, 
>as the childbirth.

I have said that I think childbirth is a wonderful thing.  I only argue
that 
a).  Neither you nor I have any way of knowing, because I assume that you
haven't given birth to a child (just your endless supply of flame.shit.)

and b).  There are many people who do not think childbirth is as wonderful
as you think it is, and it is not for you to decide for them.

THAT is all I have said.  NEVER have I said childbirth is bad.  I have
never said women shouldn't have babies.  I have only said that they should
be allowed to decide for themselves.
You cannot prove otherwise.  There is no flame in the world that is going to
refute what I have just said.  I know what I have said, and you are
hopelessly, utterly, absolutely, horribly WRONG.
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Intellectuals & women
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 21:58:57 GMT

In article <1993Jan24.061211.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <1993Jan24.091306.12344@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan24.014919.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>
>Yes, but you are an actor, you pretend to show, telling this 
>to us, that you have strong feelings, that you are an artist.

My little Michelina, I do not need to pretend to have strong feelings.
I do.  And I don't need to prove to you that I am an artist.

>Puah! You live on your world man, you have been throwing 
>shit over the concept of childbirts.

You have been throwing shit over the concept of womanhood!!

>
>I never said that we have to enforce women, I belive that 
>they don't need to be enforced if they have the opportunity 
>to decide what they prefer, and not what they have to do.

You are a moron. You just cannot see that in you system, they would not
be allowed to decide.  You are just too stupid, too illiterate, too much
of a fucking slug to see that.  You are lost, Michelina, lost...
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Truth about scandinavian men and italian women
Date: 22 Jan 1993 17:12:48 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <C185qM.xo@news.cso.uiuc.edu> levine@symcom.math.uiuc.edu (Lenore Levine) writes:
|moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
|
|>dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
|>>P.S.	And now let me work, that I have a family to pay for...
|>>	(you know what it means in italian, right Moana?)
|
|>Yes, I know. How many toilets did you clean for your wife's new furcoat 
|>(christmas present)? It was very expensive (because of the wideness)?
|
|>Moana.
|
|Moana, consider the values you revealed in this posting. 

Values???

I suggest, Ms Levine, you piss off out of alt.flame pretty sharpish.

|I think you just flamed yourself. Quite effectively.

And you, of course, would know.

~THE GREAT NAME
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!