HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject:  Yo Richboy
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 13:49:34 GMT

My apologies to the soc.single community for giving
this child more attention than he deserves.

But so far he seems to be a little slow on the uptake,
and I just hope that along the way he will get a small clue.

tarra@skat.usc.edu (Frat Boy) writes:
] 
] You obviously are the only person who lost friends or family members in Viet
] Nam, so you know more about it than everyone else.  Well you are wrong, and
] you are stupid for implying this.  You are also stupid for trying to place
] blame on a particular group for the whole war. 


hate to be the bearer of bad tidings....

but do you have any idea of the actual casualty rate for the cold war????

{ ever wonder why some of us have more respect for the hero
of Red Oktober than for whiney kids like you? Ever wonder why
some of us have more kinship for our AfghaniVet Contacts???? }


Did You happen to remember when Wheelus AFB was an 
american Air Base, and not a Target????

I really want to thank you for reminding me why I
put my Yahoo on the line for God, and Country....

To keep drips like you safe so that they could
stand around and piss on our dead about their 
fucking support of us....


Thank You The Fuck all to HELL.

No why don't you find one of your cut out of cardboard
little college girls who couldn't piss her way out
of a wet paper bag, and show Her Just How HeForkingManlyYouBe.


now, have you got the clue?

ciao
drieux

ps: To you they may be geeks, nerds, what ever.
TO ME THEY BE FAMILY SO FUCK OFF AND DIE!


-- 
I Do Not Believe in .sig files
as they are such a Known Waste Of BandWidth,
And Therefore Not a Morally UpRight Choice.
But I Can See the HideousHienousHandOfHeteroSexualityBehindItAll.
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Starry, Starry Night
Date: 24 Jul 92 14:48:22 GMT
	<MARTINC.92Jul23223345@grover.cs.unc.edu>
	<1992Jul24.131223.184@news.acns.nwu.edu>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu's message of 24 Jul 92 13:12:23 GMT

In article <1992Jul24.131223.184@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:

   In article <MARTINC.92Jul23223345@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
   >In article <1992Jul23.213750.19319@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
   >
   >   In article <92201.34487.NMICELI@avm.cc.fsu.edu> NMICELI@avm.cc.fsu.edu writes:
   >   >>Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
   >   >
   >   >     Northwestern, huh...(And is that Dr. Max, rather than
   >   >     a mere grad student (g)? Please forgive my mistake in the
   >   >     previous post, if that's the case.)  In what field are you
   >   >     working?
   >   >
   >   >     And what's going on in the greater Chicagoland area?
   >   >     (Besides da Cubs and da Sox?)
   >
   >
   >   Do you realize that you are posting questions that are directed solely at
   >   me to over 80,000 people? Do you really think I'm likely to answer them?
   >
   >But, um, Max dear -- didn't you?

   Ah Charlie so did you. Sure I knew but I wasn't sure he did. It was the
   style ya know. Sounded like he thought he sent me an e-mail message.

Well, you did too.  Sorry, I was just kidding you -- it does read like
the abovementioned keyed "followup" when he meant "reply".
--

Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens. -- Schiller
Ergo bibamus! -- Goethe
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: rock@medch.b17a.ingr.com (Chris Hudson)
Subject: Re: Define "FEMININE" anything goes...
Reply-To: rock@medch.b17a.ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 21:19:27 GMT

drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:

>Whoa up there fella. Someone beat you to it sorry.

S'alright.  I just got a bit carried away envisioning your definition od
feminine.  And remembering some of the things my ex wore under her jeans...

Chris
From: micor.ocunix.on.ca!graydon@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: long hair
Date: 22 Jul 92 00:49:00 GMT
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC.
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca (Mark Israel) writes:

> In articles <Tc26NB2w162w@micor.ocunix.on.ca> and 
<L116NB1w162w@micor.ocunix.
> 
>    I *do* insist on a combination of traits that I prefer before going 
> steady.  Would you be willing to go steady with a woman whom you *didn't*
> prefer to others?  Why?
> 
> > Couple of questions, here, Mark - first, what has length of hair got
> > to do with a relationship, as opposed to how aesthetically attractive 
> > you find the person?  
> 
>    I prefer to try to establish a romantic relationship with a woman whom
> I prefer.
> 
> userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca  Mark Israel
> Sunbeams brightly play, where Fancy's fair pavilion once is pight.


You 'prefer to try to establish a romantic relationship with a
woman whom you prefer'.  By itself, this is sensible; everyone 
has some sort of selection criteria.

What you've said about your selection criteria amounts to 'no
smokers' and 'long hair'.  This seems to imply a very strong 
weighting toward aesthetics, which strikes me as insane.

Maybe I'm just desperate to talk to, but even the two strong
physical requirements I've got (doesn't smoke, and lives in herself)
are self image and phycological just as much as physical.

Graydon

        Graydon the Curious         /graydon@micor.ocunix.on.ca
  Skraeling Althing, EAldormere, MK / "Nihil est quin obsisti possit"
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: dpollard@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Dennis B Pollard)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 17:26:31 GMT

This sort of things happens more than people would readily admit.  I recall a 
16 year old, young thing, who offered to give it to me last summer.  I'm now 24
years old.

This summer, Miss Thang is due to deliver her first child.  NO IT'S NOT MINE, I
DIDN'T DO IT.  One guy in the 'hood told me that she had been with one of his 
friends, who was around 32.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tfarmer@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz (Thomas Farmer)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: The Cave MegaBBS, Public Access Usenet, Wellington, NZ
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 92 09:50:06 GMT

In article <PALOU.92Jul23133645@osnome.che.wisc.edu> palou@osnome.che.wisc.edu (Ignasi Palou-Rivera) writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.165024.26729@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> markn@ssd.comm.mot.com (Mark Nowak) writes:
>
>>   Before labelling having sex with a 14-year-old girl as sick, I think
>>   that values have changes a lot over the years.  Wasn't Juliet 14
>>   when she married Romeo?

>>  Mayan women married at the age of 16.  Also,
>
>And they had human sacrifices too, good reference.

Well, I often don't understand American jokes because they have
someone acting horrified when they find themselves in bed with a 16
year old.

I have to remember thatlaws relating to sex are a bit different in the
States as the age of consent here is 16 for females and 16 for
homosexual acts between males. 

So, what actually is the age of consent in the States? Does it very
from state to state What's the lowest/highest?
-- 
tfarmer@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz +64-4-499-3832 (home) //         Beagle
tfarmer@datamark.co.nz +64-4-233-8186 (work)    _ //  Compubuild 486
    I ain't nothin' but a Hound Dog             \\/ Amiga 3000 25/40
From: hudel@waterloo.hp.com (Chris Hudel)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: 14 year old women
Date: 29 Jul 92 14:10:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: waterloo.Bs5M26.126
Distribution: soc
Organization: Hewlett Packard (Panacom Division)
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1scd1 PL4

stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
: These days (being older and wiser) I try to stick to guys who are no more 
: than 18 percent younger than I am. 
: 
: BTW, following this guideline, no one older than 17 could do a 14-year-old. 
: 
Which I recall is the law in Ontario, Canada with respect to consenting
sex with minors.  A two year age difference (in either sex's favor) is
allowed at the age > 12 years.  

Of course, this is all from memory. And memory being what it is, I haven't
got lots left.

,Chris.
--
                                                         Chris Hudel
business: hudel@waterloo.hp.com                         519/883-3080
pleasure: chudel@watarts.waterloo.edu             
(Pleasure forwards to business...)       - all comments are mine, not HP's -
From: williamsa@topaz.ucq.edu.au
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 26 Jul 92 19:49:18 AET
Organization: University of Central Queensland, Australia

In article <1992Jul25.095006.6828@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz>, tfarmer@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz (Thomas Farmer) writes:
> Well, I often don't understand American jokes because they have
> someone acting horrified when they find themselves in bed with a 16
> year old.
> 
> I have to remember thatlaws relating to sex are a bit different in the
> States as the age of consent here is 16 for females and 16 for
> homosexual acts between males. 
> 
> So, what actually is the age of consent in the States? Does it very
> from state to state What's the lowest/highest?

I thought you New Zealanders would be more interested in the age of
consent between humans and sheep.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: Used threads
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 22 Jul 92 19:39:19 GMT

drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>BTW ever seen a 6'2" man back off very quickly from an angry 5'2" woman?

Smart man.  He can picture just where that roundhouse punch is going
to land!

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: topless
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 15:26:32 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In  <1992Jul20.181750.4849@zooid.guild.org>  Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org> writes:
>
> Considering that it's apparently now legal for women to go topless in
> New York State, it would seem to be more fun to hold a Boink in New York,
> topless-wise at least.

What a coincidence - we just happen to be having a Boink in New York -
the weekend of Aug. 1.

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Morality- Alarming results
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 18:31:05 GMT

In article <3781@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> gswst@gl.pitt.edu (Gary S Wachs) writes:
>Hey folks,
>
> I read somewhere, can't remember where, about the results of a morality
>questionaire.  A few thousand adult males in an urban area were polled,
>if I remember correctly.  Two particularly disappointing points that stuck in
>my head were the following questions:
>
> 1. Have you ever seriously considered raping a woman?
>     the "Yes"'s were somewhere in the 10-15% area
>
> 2. Do you think you could ever actually rape a woman if you were
>    given assurance that you could not get caught?
>     the "Yes"'s skyrocketed to somewhere in the 50-70% area this time.
>
>If this is accurate, then it seems Bart Simpson's "I didn't do it-no one
>saw me do it-you can't prove a thing" attitude is more than just a popular
>form of entertainment - it's a current attitude in the country.
>Any ideas on what we can do about this?

Well, to some extent, this may be due to the almost continual exposure
people in out society get to the message "it's OK to force sex on a
woman" and the association between violence against women and sexual
pleasure.  (Indeed, the "slasher film" genre appears to be designed
with this end in mind, using fairly sophisticated techniques that are
exactly what you'd do if you wanted to create a psychological
conditioning program intended to train people to associate violence
against women with sexual pleasure.)  Whether it's a James Bond
adventure or a low-budget SF/fantasy flic, such a high proportion
of movies (especially those aimed at a young adult audience) contain
the message "forcing sex on women is OK and it's what they really
want anyway" that it's not at all surprising that so many men don't
think of rape as wrong, they think of it as merely illegal.

Trygve
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Pickup Lines
Date: 26 Jul 92 03:57:56 GMT
	<1992Jul9.024204.18873@uwm.edu>
	<MARTINC.92Jul9010004@grover.cs.unc.edu>
	<MARTINC.92Jul9011357@grover.cs.unc.edu> <3966@novavax.UUCP>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: mitch@novavax.UUCP's message of 26 Jul 92 00:22:18 GMT

In article <3966@novavax.UUCP> mitch@novavax.UUCP (Mitch Silverman) writes:

   Oh, and in article <MARTINC.92Jul9011357@grover.cs.unc.edu>
   martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

   >Hmmm.  Let's try another one of those hypotheticals.  (Sometimes I think
   >I should have been a rabbi.)

   Funny, you don't look Jewish.  8-)

That's pretty much what my mom's rabbi said.

(ObHint:  My mom converted when I was about 27.)
--
Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am he who walks the States with a barb'd tongue, questioning every
one I meet,/Who are you that wanted only to be told what you knew
before?/ Who are you that wanted only a book to join you in your
nonsense?"  _Leaves of Grass_ xxiii.4.
From: swann@acsu.buffalo.edu (Stephen Swann)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Define "FEMININE" anything goes...
Date: 30 Jul 92 16:57:11 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: UB

In article <1992Jul30.123047.15612@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>>
>>|Feminine is wearing pink Hanes Her Ways panties (and nothing
>>|else) between freshly washed cotton sheets ....
>> 
>>What a coincidence. *I* like sleeping in pink Hanes Her Way panties (and
>>nothing else)...
>
> It's a small world after all. It's a small small world.
> Although they do muss my hair and there's no hole for my nose.

Is anybody saving these posts?

-- 
Steve Swann                 |    Speak to me in many voices; make
swann@acsu.buffalo.edu      |      them all sound like one...  -BOC
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: Oh No!  I'm still a Nice Guy!
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 10:31:48 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1860@sheoak.bcae.oz.au> i900019@redgum.ucnv.edu.au (Tim Knipe) writes:
>I thought I was cured.  All the good signs were there.  But now, at the

Now, now, you're well on your way, don't dispair.

>the 3rd perfect
>opportunity so far :-<) of expressing my interest in this particular woman,

Don't 'express'- show. 
Nice Guy thing to do, but shows interest- find out what sort of flowers she
likes, if you can. Send her a batch. Make sure she knows who its from- sending
them anonymously does you no good.
Take her out to a quiet dinner place. Say 'as friends', but you'll know full
well by the end of the evening how >she< feels about it.

There will be time for the 'I think you're wonderful' lines later.

Good Luck!
r.

ps- good advice to other NG's as well- with luck, they'll listen to you :)
From: walter (Walter Lego)
Subject: Re: long hair
Followup-To: soc.singles
Reply-To: nobody
Organization: Twisted Pair Inc.
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 19:31:29 GMT

In article <1992Jul24.100244.16230@wpi.WPI.EDU> terrylee@wpi.WPI.EDU (The Cookie Goddess) writes:
>In article <12362@mahon> mahon@Software.Mitel.COM (Ed Mahon) writes:
>>
>>How do the net.ladies feel about *guys* with long hair?
>>
>I absolutely *adore* long hair on guys.  I definately prefer it over short 
>hair.  Come to think of it, I don't know of any short-haired guys I've been
>really attracted to.
>

I should mention, for the benefit of impressionable net.male.minds, that this
is a conspiracy to inflict on the males the same hair-management agonies that 
females have had to undergo.

						Walter

What disclaimer?
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Morality- Alarming results
Date: 29 Jul 92 19:45:21 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <y2nmfz-.aahz@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius) writes:
|In article <1992Jul29.035035.16360@zooid.guild.org> Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org> writes:
|>
|>Once a apon time 14 year old could marry and then support his family
|>working in the fields.  Nowadays no 14 year could support his family
|>and would be great burden on society.  So, it seems to me to be very
|>reasonable for modern society to discourage 14 years old from having
|>sex, just like I think it's reasonable for an goverment to impose speed
|>limits that save lives.
|
|That's a really good idea!  In California, anyone driving must possess
|proof of insurance, or proof of a sufficiently large bond.  How about
|adapting that to sex?  Now, everyone can ask to sex your sex license,
|which you won't receive unless you have child insurance or a reasonable
|facsimile thereof......
|
|Remember, you heard it here first.

On a related note, I heard this morning about a proposed law in New Jersey,
I believe, that would cancel welfare to a woman if she became pregant and
had another child while on welfare.  

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
From: keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Colour of P*bic Hair - Whats the most common
Date: 27 Jul 92 22:21:49 GMT
Organization: California-Nevada Methodist Homes

In article <1992Jul23.111402.10036@tcom.stc.co.uk> rickt@tcom.stc.co.uk (Rick Tait) writes:
>This is just out of pure curiousity, but I was wondering
>what the most common colour of the old short 'n' curlies is?
>(On both sexes). 
>My guess is sorta light brown to mid brown, but who knows.
>I'm a light-brown/blond kinda guy.
>------------------------------------------------
>Rick Tait
>Network Engineer - NMBase Project - BNR (Europe)
>rickt@tcom.stc.co.uk
Thanks a lot for that information, Rick.  We really needed to 
know that. ;-|			--Keith
From: lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: NO SKIMPIES FOR CHRIS' VACATION
Date: 28 Jul 92 17:28:05 +1700
Organization: Lamar University - Beaumont

In article <1992Jul28.163938.22191@news.acns.nwu.edu>, drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
> In article <1992Jul28.154728.11657@infonode.ingr.com> rock@medch.b17a.ingr.com writes:
>>drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>>
>>>Feminine means skimpy silk undies underneath blue jeans
>>
>>That's it for me!  I think I've finally decided where I'm going for my 
>>vacation!  Evanston!
>>
>>Chris 
> 
> 
> Whoa up there fella. Someone beat you to it sorry.


HEHEHEHEHEHEHE!  I think Marianna pulled that horses' halter pretty tight!

Poor Chris....  But look Chris, while you are at home having a boring vacation,
just remember, someone in Evanston is loungeing happily in Mariannas
"Skimpies".

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNET: LAIRDPG@LUB001.LAMA.EDU                |      PRACTICE SAFE HEX -
these are my views and not my employers views!   |  USE A WRITE PROTECT TAB!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: sjo2693@tesla.njit.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Those looooong and hard love sessions
Date: 22 Jul 92 23:23:24 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology

In article <1992Jul22.091927.1@tesla.njit.edu>, sjo2693@tesla.njit.edu writes:
> In article <1992Jul21.204551.5268@uwm.edu>, markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
>> In article <1992Jul21.092036.1@tesla.njit.edu> sjo2693@tesla.njit.edu writes:
>>>In article <1992Jul20.173849.12055@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>, ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
>>>> mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor) writes:
>>>>>I think the highest compliment I got in that respect was when he said,
>>>>>" wow, I almost passed out on that one."
>>>> 
>>>> Sure beats the heck out of "I especially liked it when you moved!"
>>>Know what you mean about passing out..been there...so was she
>> 
>> Now that we got the pleasure dimension all discussed out, here's a related
>> question this time on the temporal dimension:
>> 
>>          What's the longest you've ever spent (or ever wanted to spend)
>>          making love with someone?
> I prefer lovemaking to last as long as two people can stand but my RP
> (romantic partner)doesn't want sex to last..not as high a priority for
> her as me....opposite sex drives....Oh well....
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: NOT Pickup Lines, ferchrissake, but being InTeReSting, maybe
Keywords: lime Jello, cops, snakes, hematomas, diseases
Date: 24 Jul 92 18:56:32 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <thurlow.711944642@convex.convex.com> thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
|In <1992Jul23.034702.15825@osf.org> oaf@serverx.osf.org (Oded Feingold) writes:
|
|>Does anyone know if Kenn Barry survived the last earthquack?
|
|I'd bet he's still ducking ...

I don't think Kenn was anywhere near the last earthquack.  I down know 
waddle he will do when the next one hits though.  

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
Newsgroups: soc.singles