HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: oahvenla@snakemail.hut.fi (Osma Ahvenlampi)
Subject: Re: A Style Guide Question
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
	<37104@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:56:02 GMT

In article <37104@cbmvax.commodore.com> peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) writes:
>Second, the fact that menu keys are processed while string gadgets
>are active is effectively a "bug" in Intuition 1.3 and earlier.  2.0
>and higher Intuition cannot readily support this.  (Note that I called
>it a bug.  I'm not saying that the bug produces undesirable behavior).

Well, that explains why CygnusED can't for example quit its search string
requester with Amiga-L (leave)... I've been wondering about that...

>There needs to be some modeless way to strike the key-equivalent for
>a gadget even while a string gadget is active.  There isn't a good
>universal way right now.

I like the way reqtools.library works.. Isn't ASL very much like it? I don't
remember, as I use reqtools all the time... Is that not style guide
compatible then?
--
Osma Ahvenlampi  -  oahvenla@snakemail.hut.fi   * Workstation power for micro-
All my opinions are not necessarily really mine * computer price: Amiga := FUN
From: Paul_Trauth@agwbbs.new-orleans.LA.US (Paul Trauth)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Are copper blits compatible with multitasking?
Distribution: world
Date: 23 Nov 92 09:42:38 CST
Organization: The Amiga GateWay BBS * New Orleans, La.

Let's say i'm putting up a display by jamming my own copperlist into
coplch. How well would doing blits via this copperlist work with the Amiga
OS? (and i need to know for v1.3 to 3.0, if it's different...)
I'm in the process of writing a fairly sprite-oriented game, and it seems
that it's a simple enough design that if i can do the few blits i need, i
could easily have a really cool game that could be played while
downloading. (Maybe not at 14.4k...)

One other thing that may also be a factor in making this thing
system-friendly is the fact that the main engine is run off of a
copper-triggered interrupt at the bottom of the display area.
(wonder if a good way to make that a bit less obnoxious [i push the
interrupt routine's address into the hardware vectors, and yes, i am
VBR-safe, or at least i will be before i release it) would be to grab all
the audio channels [since i'll be making sound anyway] and trigger a l4
interrupt with the copper... seems like nobody would be USING the l4 vector
once i snagged all 4 channels. do i think right?)

(BTW, the game in progress is a /good/ rendition of the old C64 classic
Space Taxi. I /still/ love this game...)

-- Via DLG Pro v0.995

- be zorch, daddi-o --------------- paul (raccoon) trauth ----------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet -> paul_trauth@agwbbs.new-orleans.LA.US        \\\///\\\///\\\
Usenet   -> rex!agwbbs!paul_trauth                      \\\///\\\///\\\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
  "eagles may fly, but a weasel will never get sucked into a jet engine"
From: fillg1@uni-paderborn.de (Michael Illgner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: AutoDoc -> AmigaGuide ?
Date: 19 Nov 1992 09:28:02 GMT
Organization: Uni-GH Paderborn, Germany
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: wien.uni-paderborn.de

Hi folks,

I am looking for a tool to convert the standard AutoDoc files to AmigaGuide
documents. Does such baby exist in the PD ?

							Michael


-- 
Michael Illgner 	fillg1@uni-paderborn.de          Tel. 
Theodorstrasse 27       Warburger Strasse 100		 Buero  05251/60-2331
4790 Paderborn		Theoretische Physik		 Privat 05251/26488
Germany                 Buero : N3.323
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: wlanders@nexus.yorku.ca (W L Anderson)
Subject: Re: physical memory protection with MMU
Organization: York University, CS Dept. Toronto
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:45:17 GMT

>The drawback is that the message could contain a pointer to some other
>chunk of memory that isn't declared MEMF_PUBLIC.  While Exec could make
>the message's memory MEMF_PUBLIC if needed, since it doesn't enforce a
>particular structure upon messages, it wouldn't know that the message
>contained a pointer and thus couldn't change the type of the second
>memory block.  The process that received the message would then crash
>when it tried to access that memory.

I guess that would cause a problem :).  This sure seems kind of annoying, 
particularly when it back in the ADos 1.0 days that we might eventually have
memory protection and such.  Somehow, there must be way.

Tom Hayko
wlanders@nexus.yorku.ca
From: Lee_Robert_Willis@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: PRIVATE to Gilles Soulet
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 19:52:44 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world

rz
**B00000000000000
PRIVATE TO GILLES SOULET:

(Sorry about the wasted bandwidth, but I keep sending email that
Gilles doesn't seem to get.)


>OK, hello again Lee.
>
>I don't understand the reason why you don't 
>reply to my mail. Are you in hollydays ?
>Have you got to much work ? 
>
>Well, I ask you again for your real Adress
>so that I can send you an issue of "Amiga-News"
>with my test of Precognition ...
>
>		  Gilles Soulet

Hi Gilles.  I've *been* replying.  In fact, I sent you couple of
emails.  I think my responses must be getting lost in the net,
somewhere.

My address is 

   Lee Willis
   590 Eleanora Drive
   Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio USA 44223-2732

NOTE: This is also listed at the bottom of "Precognition.doc".

Lee      Lee_Robert_Willis@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: sims@sauron.msfc.nasa.gov (Herb Sims)
Subject: Lattice 5.10 upgrade
Keywords: upgrade
Organization: NASA/MSFC
Date: 23 Nov 92 14:07:01 GMT

I have a favor to ask of some-one concering SAS C V5.10(x) upgrade.  Somehow
SAS did not send me the upgrade from 5.04 to 5.10 is there someone out the
there who would be kind enough to send me the upgrade disk?  If it cost money
to get the upgrade from 5.04 to 5.10(x) then I am sorry and please put this
note in the :dev/null bin.  Before anyone tells me to call SAS I already have
and they do not have any more 5.10(x) upgrades since the 6.00 has come
out.

THanks in advance

Herb



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W. Herb Sims                                        sims@sauron.msfc.nasa.gov or
KU0C                                                sims@avdms8.msfc.nasa.gov
MSFC/NASA/EB33				
Huntsville, AL 35812				    PP-ASEL-IA

           _#      **MMp     g#00   `N##0"     _agN#0P0N#            _#L
          g##       jN##    j##F     J##     _dN0"      "           g##L
        _#]##      _0 ##L  jN##F     ###    g#0"                  _03##L
       gE_j##      #  0## jF ##F    j##F   j##     ______        gE_j##L
     _0"""N##     d"  J##L0  ##F    0##    0##     "9##F"      _0"""5##L
   _gF    ]##    jF    ##0   ##F    ##F    `##k     d##      _gF    j##L
 _g#_    _j##L__g#__   ]N  _j##L_ _d##L_    `#Nh___g#N'    _g#_    _j##L_
`""""    """""'""""'    "  """""" """"""       """""""    `""""    """"""
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: s442013@nexus.yorku.ca (Ray Frederick)
Subject: kprint via the serial port
Organization: York University
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 04:43:24 GMT

I would like to debug my C programs using kprintf over the serial ports. I have
an A3000 and A500 and have connected them via a switch box. The output from my
3000 can go to the modem or A500 depending on which switch I flip. I can 
use the modem fine but once I try connecting to the A500 nothing happens. Is 
their something special I have to do? I have set both computers to 9600 using
VLT and cannot transfer anything.


Thanks, Ray.	s442013@nexus.yorku.ca


Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: cchu@nyx.cs.du.edu (Calvin Chu)
Subject: un-intuitionizing a c program
Summary: How do I get RID OF THE WINDOWS??
Keywords: c
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 92 05:54:12 GMT

I have a C program called client.c for the Amiga.  I got
it with dmamiga.lha (DikuMUD For AmigaDOS).  The problem that
I have with it is that I need a client to access the server
that uses the CLI, not a separate intuition window.  I have the
gcc C source for it but I simply don't understand C well enough
to remove the offending code.  It may be impossible without
rewriting the entire program.  In that case I don't understand
MessagePorts well enough to do that.  It's a small 7K C program,
is it possible that somebody volunteer to cut out and compile
a non-intuitionized client program?

Thanks.
Calvin.

Organization: Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 11:20:56 -0500 
From: "Edward D. Berger" <eb15+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: ARexx Function Host Standards???

I'm looking for any listing of standard functions to implement in an ARexx
host program, beyond those listed in the Amiga User Interface Style Guide,
and the one (XIV-41)Amiga Mail article (ARexx Command Set for MIDI Sequencers)
that I have already.

Are there standards for:
  Databases?
  SpreadSheets?
  Paint Programs?
  Word Processors?
  DTP packages?
  Music programs?
  3D stuff?
  CAD?
  Multimedia?

I've also looked in the following:
   Programmer's Guide to ARexx
   Using ARexx on the Amiga

They don't have much to say on the subject of "Standard" application specific
type of functions.

-Ed Berger
eb15@andrew.cmu.edu
From: davids@cats.ucsc.edu (Dave Schreiber)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: physical memory protection with MMU
Date: 18 Nov 92 03:16:39 GMT
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
NNTP-Posting-Host: as215-ws-5.ucsc.edu


In article <paulk.28d4@terapin.com> paulk@terapin.com (Paul Kienitz) writes:
>> The real problem stems for two (or more) tasks that pass their own
>> privately defined structures around.
> 
>I must disagree.  Since so many programs pass so much memory between
>tasks both in system defined ways and in private ways, the odds are
>that you'll end up with memory protection that leaves unprotected a
>significant fraction of all memory in use.  Another concern is
>performance ... one MUST retain the ability to pass Exec messages in
>near zero time, for currenps to work well.  My MIDI sequencer,
>for instance, can easily pass a single message through a dozen
>different tasks between the press of a key and the sounding of the
>resulting note.  That has to be done QUICKLY.

Actually, I've been talking about compatibility, not about the level
of protection.  I agree that the current setup (memory is either totally
private or totally public) will leave a lot of memory unprotected, but
it is better to have some memory protection than none at all.  I hope that,
when a memory-protection-equipped version of AmigaDOS comes out, Exec
will provide a more sophisticated form of memory sharing that new applications
can take advantage of.  That, or MEMF_PUBLIC, should insure that message
passing retains the speed it has now.


-- 
Dave Schreiber  "Look.  Don't touch."  davids@cats.ucsc.edu (until 6/20/93)
From: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Programming an Overscan screen under 2.04
Date: 19 Nov 92 14:51:37 GMT
Reply-To: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna)
Organization: Commodore-Amiga, Inc.  West Chester, PA.

In article <9755@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> amigaman+@pitt.edu (Russell A Howard) writes:
>
>	I'm tcurrently working on a project and want to use a 640 X 480
>overscan screen.  If I open a 640 X 480 screen with OpenScreenTags and
>specify "SA_Overscan" to be STANDARD it opens the screen ok.

"Standard" overscan is not guaranteed to necessarily be 480 lines tall on
all Amigas.  It's a user-preference which the user might not choose to
set that big.

>640 X 480 window.  I then bli a bitmap onto the window which is 640 X 400.  
>This is where the problem occurs...  The image is only 640X400, so the bottom
>of the window should be clear, but it's not.  The image that I blit into the
>upper part of the screen appears again right after the correct image except
>the colors for the image are wrong.

You must be doing something incorrectly.  Is the screen a CUSTOMBITMAP
screen, or do you let Intuition allocate the screen's bitmap.  Are you
using the correct blit size (400 lines)?

>Russ Howard

     Peter
--
Peter Cherna, User Interface Development Group, Commodore-Amiga, Inc.
{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!peter    peter@cbmvax.commodore.com
My opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer.
"I believe it's bad luck to be superstitious."

Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: geoffo@spectrum.cs.unsw.oz.au (Geoff Oakley)
Subject: Re: Unusual SAS6.0 results
Organization: none
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 02:59:42 GMT

In article <BxrwC8.3AG@fc.hp.com> koren@fc.hp.com (Steve Koren) writes:

   [ a particular module ]  runs as before, but it is *much* slower.  I'm talking
   about 20X here.  It is getting no enforcer hits; I've checked that.  Since
   I really wanted to get it back to its old execution speed, I did a
   lprof and lstat on it.  I'm getting _really_ wierd results.

I am getting something similar, which I will tell EMITS when my
registration comes through.  I isolated my problem down to the
following:

   #include <stdio.h>
   #include <stdlib.h>
   
   void main ()
   {
     int i,j;
   
     putchar('?');
     for (i=0 ; i<80 ; i++)
       for (j=0 ; j<80 ; j++)
         free(malloc(j));
   }

Compiled with

   sc link test.c

the program runs in 2 seconds.


The interesting thing is when I remove the `putchar' line.  When I
recompile, the program runs in 108 seconds.  SAS/C v5.10a takes 2
seconds for both versions.

Am I doing something totally whacky?


geoff o


--

	       geoffo@cse.unsw.edu.au
Geoff Oakley:  CS & E, UNSW, PO Box 1, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
	       Phone: +61 2 697 4043	Fax: +61 2 313 7987
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: ejames@venus.iucf.indiana.edu (ERIC JAMES)
Subject: Arexx for EmpFe
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4   
Reply-To: ejames@venus.iucf.indiana.edu
Organization: nothing
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:47:31 GMT

  I am looking for Arexx macros for EmpFe the Empire front-end.  I plan on
collecting them and later packageing them all togather to upload to an ftp
site for everyone.  Any contributions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Eric James
From: mbs@adastra.cvl.va.us (Michael B. Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: What is wrong with this very simple c program?
Distribution: world
X-NewsSoftware: GRn-beta 1.16g (11.15.92) by Michael B. Smith & Mike Schwartz
Date: 16 Nov 92 06:42:32 EDT
Organization: Well, I haven't decided on a name yet...

In article <johnv.03kr@acix.DIALix.oz.au> johnv@acix.DIALix.oz.au (John Verhoeven) writes:
> James Cooper (jamie@cdevil.unx.sas.com) wrote:
> > C doesn't have any protection mechanism to see if you go outside the
> > boundaries of an array.  You have to check for this yourself.
>
> Whats even more fun :-) is that in some compilers accessing arrays with
> a negative subscript is also legal, eg foo[-1] = 5.
>
> Does SAS C V6 allow this ?

If it doesn't, it's broken.

This construct is very useful, especially when using it with pointers.
For example:

                char *p;

                ...
                p[-1] = '\0';
                ...

I use it when building up arrays of null-terminated strings quite a bit..
--
  //   Michael B. Smith
\X/    mbs@adastra.cvl.va.us  -or-  uunet.uu.net!virginia.edu!adastra!mbs
From: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: How to program multi-threaded programs on Amiga ?
Date: 22 Nov 92 02:32:22 GMT
Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA

In article <RNlXr*DG7@garfield.fipnet.fi> vsaari@garfield.fipnet.fi (Ville Saari) writes:
>Randell Jesup (jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com) wrote:
>: 	It's farily easy to start a subroutine as a process under 2.0 using
>: CreateNewProc() with NP_Entry.  There are a few things to watch out for
>: (setting up global data pointers, and handling of library bases), but it's
>: pretty easy.  Make sure the sub-process exits before the main process!

>What is the right way for sub-process to exit and how can the main process
>be absolutely sure the sub-process has exited?

	The two normal methods would be an unbalanced Forbid() (similar to
what all WB-launched processes use), or under 2.0x or later you can use
NP_ExitCode/NP_ExitData to signal or send a message (or whatever) to the
parent process.

-- 
To be or not to be = 0xff
-
Randell Jesup, Jack-of-quite-a-few-trades, Commodore Engineering.
{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com  BIX: rjesup  
Disclaimer: Nothing I say is anything other than my personal opinion.
From: peterk@cbmger.de.so.commodore.com (Dr Peter Kittel Germany)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: How to visualize control chars? (Was: Re: Fast Text output...)
Date: 23 Nov 92 12:05:32 GMT
Reply-To: peterk@cbmger.de.so.commodore.com (Dr Peter Kittel Germany)
Organization: Commodore Germany

In article <1992Nov17.205949.27174@sth.frontec.se> bjst@sth.frontec.se (Bjorn Stenberg) writes:
>Opinions Wanted:
>----------------
>How should my text applications (such as editors or viewers) visualize
>control chars (0x00 -> 0x1f) and all chars without an equivalent graphic
>block in the font?

I still prefer the way the PET and C64 and the current Amiga Shell do it:
in reverse of the character with a code $40 higher than the control code.
Thus a linefeed becomes a reverse J, or a CR becomes a reverse M. This is
easy to read when you're accustomed to it and there's no risk for
misinterpretation if you don't need reverse already for something other.
This way you also keep the count of (visible) characters on the line constant.

-- 
Best regards, Dr. Peter Kittel  // E-Mail to \\  Only my personal opinions...
Commodore Frankfurt, Germany  \X/ {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!cbmger!peterk
Wer's nicht kann, soll's bleiben klopfen oder Steine lassen!
From: mwm@contessa.palo-alto.ca.us (Mike Meyer)
Subject: Re: New hardware reference guide?
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Distribution: world
X-NewsSoftware: Amiga Yarn 3.4, 1992/08/12 15:49:52
Keywords: 
Summary: 
Date: 17 Nov 92 13:15:53 PST
Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica

In <paulk.28cu@terapin.com>, paulk@terapin.com (Paul Kienitz) wrote:
> > I remember some time ago, when a friend of mine tried to become a
> > Registered Developer and was rejected because was only doing
> > demos...
>  
> Do what I did: mention a forthcoming product which you never actually
> write, and then once you actually do write something legitimate, let
> them know about it and maybe casually mention that the other project
> had to be abandoned.

Also note that you don't have to actually turn any of the things you
mention into commercial products. Giving them away or making them
shareware seems to work fine for certs. I read this as supporting the
hackers who kept the Amiga alive during it's early years.

	<mike
From: ps106363@cs.tut.fi (Sainio Pasi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Gcc 2.2.2 and gnu make 3.62
Date: 23 Nov 92 13:06:04
Organization: Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland.
Distribution: comp
NNTP-Posting-Host: ruosterastas.cs.tut.fi

	Has anybody been able to compile a running binary from gnu
make with gcc under Amiga.  It compiles just fine with -DPOSIX and
-DNO_LDAV, but the binary just sits in a busyloop.  If I use
ixemul.trace and trace, the trace dies with Illegal instruction after
make has called nice() -function.  Any ideas?

Setup:
	A2000 with KS1.2, WB1.3  (could this be the problem)
	512KB chip, 3MB fast
	A2090 with two 20MB drives

	- Pasi -

--
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------+
| Pasi Sainio              |                                           |
| Opiskelijankatu 17 B 19  |          Some call it laziness,           |
| 33720 Tampere 72         |          I call it deep thought           |
| Tel. 931/185486          |                                           |
| ps106363@cs.tut.fi       |                                           |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: fisherc@bohra.cpg.oz.au (Craig Fisher)
Subject: Re: Icons for assigns?
Summary: Use 'leave out'.
Organization: Computer Power Software
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 06:56:02 GMT

In article <alien.013w@> alien@acheron.amigans.gen.nz (Ross Smith) writes:
> I'd like to be able to put a "disk.info" icon into a directory, set up an
> assign to that directory, and have the pseudo-disk icon appear with the
> real disk icons on my Workbench.
>
> E.g.
>    makedir work:docs
>    copy work:disk.info work:docs/disk.info
>    assign docs: work:docs
>
> ... and viola :-) a new disk icon appears on my WB, which I can open and
> find the docs: directory (I don't mind if I have to do a reset before the
> new icon appears). The idea is that an assign should look just like a real
> drive to the GUI, which it already does to the CLI. I tend to have a lot of
> nested directories, and I'd like to be able to reach some of the more remote
> ones without going on a hunting & fishing expedition down through my Work:
> partition...
>
> Any thoughts? ("So don't nest your directories so much" doesn't count :-)

Use the 'Leave Out' command in the Icon menu!

-Craig
-- 
=======================================================
| Craig Fisher                \ P.O. Box 686          |
| fisherc@bohra.cpg.oz.au      \ Woden, ACT 2606      |
| "Keep Yourself Alive" - Queen \ Canberra, Australia |
From: breese@monet.imada.ou.dk (Bjoern Reese)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: New hardware reference guide?
Date: 15 Nov 92 15:23:46 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Math. & Computer Science, Odense University, Denmark

In article <37026@cbmvax.commodore.com> chrisg@cbmvax.commodore.com (Chris  
Green) writes:
> In article <1992Nov13.083504.58455@qut.edu.au> podesta@qut.edu.au writes:
> >Come on now!! How many advanced system software, that was written on a
> >1.3 A500 with no harddrive will work on a A4000???
> 	A LOT.

Ahhh! But not all? That's interesting.

--

Bjoern Reese                   |     Email: breese@imada.ou.dk
Odense University, Denmark     |     Voice: +45 65 932 182 (private)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Date: 18 Nov 92 22:56:40 GMT+2
Subject: vsprintf() in SAS/C 6?
From: harry@elfuerte.fipnet.fi (Harri P Pesonen)
Distribution: world
Organization: Fipnet, Helsinki, Finland
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 1.16f (10.17.92) by Mike Schwartz & Michael B. Smith

Is there a library function

int vsprintf(char *buf, char *format, va_list ptr);

or something like that in SAS/C 6.0?  It exists in MS C but doesn't in
Lattice C 5.02.

-- 
    Harri Pesonen               harry@elfuerte.fipnet.fi
    Helsinki, Finland, EC?      Markka is floating...  1 USD = 5.1 FIM
From: fheitkamp@desire.wright.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: If you have Hispeed Pascal please Read.
Date: 16 Nov 92 07:17:23 EST
Organization:  Wright State University 

In article <69453@cup.portal.com>, Tony-Preston@cup.portal.com (ANTHONY FRANCIS PRESTON) writes:
> There is a PD Pascal for the Amiga, I believe it is on one of the 
> Fish disks.

	Yes I tried PCQ pascal.  It has a serious inconsistancy with standard
	pascal,  not being able to declare pointers properly.  It also can't
	use sets.  I really was impressed as far as the work that Patrick did
	though, its not bad.  Has a new version been released?  The pointers 
	thing bothered me, so I got Hispeed Pascal instead.  The version I 
	have (1.0) only works properly with 68000 based Amigas.  It works 
	marginally with 680EC030.  It doesn't seem to work at all with 68040.

	Does anyone have a newer version that can comment on this?  I hear
	version 1.3 is out.

Fred Heitkamp,  ** My opinions only **

Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.programmer:16011 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:19864