HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: markb@spock.dis.cccd.edu (Mark Bixby)
Subject: Re: HP-3000/MPE/HP-UX Box
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Organization: Coast Community College District, Costa Mesa, CA
Date: 15 Dec 92 17:14:17 GMT

In article <1608@hcshh.hcs.de> hm@hcshh.hcs.de (Hellmuth Michaelis) writes:
>Hmm - on any 3000/9xx if seen so far, you can run HP-UX (i.e. the support tape
>is HP-UX-based ..) but you can't run MPE on every HP9000/8xx - this is just
>because there are some boards in some 8xx'es that are not (fully) supported
>by MPE.
>
>This implies that you don't have to buy new hardware when you decide to 
>migrate from MPE to HP-UX.

We're running MPE on a 980/100 for our current production system.  Over the
next couple of years, we'll be migrating to a new HPUX-based system.  When the
time comes to "pull the plug" on MPE, we'll pay a fee to HP to come out and
change some ROMs on the PDC board, plus change the nameplate on the SPU
cabinet, and voila, we'll be a Series 800.

I've never seen this conversion fee listed on any price guide, but the ability
does exist to go from Series 900 to Series 800.  Ask your local HP staff for
details.
-- 
Mark Bixby                         Internet: markb@spock.dis.cccd.edu
Coast Community College District   1370 Adams Avenue
District Information Services      Costa Mesa, CA, USA  92626
Technical Support                  (714) 432-5064
"You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish." - tunefs(1M)
From: franl@centerline.com (Fran Litterio)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: Re: Password without special characters?
Date: 16 Dec 92 13:36:10
Organization: CenterLine Software, Inc.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 140.239.3.116
In-reply-to: dave@hpdstma.ptp.hp.com's message of 16 Dec 1992 18:14:55 GMT

dave@hpdstma.ptp.hp.com (Dave Waller) writes:

>  killoran@ll.mit.edu (Mike Killoran) writes:

> |> 	Is there a way around HP's requirement that all passwords
> |> have a number or special character in them?

> The only way to enter a password without restriction is to do it as root.
> This is a standard security feature that one will find on almost any UNIX
> variant, although some do allow non-root users to set passwords without
> restrictions.

The man pages for yppasswd(1) on my HP-UX 8.07 and 9.0 systems (both
Series 700s) say this:

   Checks occur to ensure that
   the new password meets the following construction requirements.

	+  Only the first eight characters are significant.

	+  A password can be as few as four characters long if it
	   contains

	      +  at least one special character or

	      +  a mixture of numeric, uppercase and lowercase letters.

	+  A password can be as few as five characters long if it
	   contains a mixture of

	      +  uppercase and lowercase letters or

	      +  numeric and either uppercase or lowercase letters.

	+  A password must contain at least six characters if it contains
	   only monocase letters.

   All these rules except the first are relaxed if you try three times to
   enter an unacceptable new password.  You cannot, however, enter a null
   password.
--
franl@centerline.com         "So what we've decided to do is set you up in
uunet!centerline!franl        Cicely, situated in an area that we Alaskans
617-498-3255 (USA)            refer to as The Alaskan Riviera."

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.0

mQCNAisQJSUAAAED/jbCQchSwFG7IFKkrCQ6QKLxB0LVbP6co87karNBb88ur1+S
FK82JT9mNlWKvP4HHFEI1kLKk0PAvd0nez/mQIriAMUT2pfOnIAtdqtpddgQseZZ
7BY2vMiorjG7pe6e11Q+UIQcvqsY3Bl89YBgqrydWm8UWMy2qXeXQmAScOodAAUR
tC9GcmFuY2lzIFAuIExpdHRlcmlvLCBKci4gPGZyYW5sQGNlbnRlcmxpbmUuY29t
Pg==
=6hNb
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
From: a722756@roper.mc.ti.com (W. Donald Rolph)
Subject: lanman/x server software
Originator: a722756@roper.mc.ti.com
Organization: Texas Instruments / Attleboro Mass / USA
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 14:16:20 GMT


I am trrying to get my HP 9000/730 to provide a full set of services to my
environment.  We have a lot of pcs running lanman, fortunately over tcp/ip.  We 
have tied them into our other unix machines as well as the pc server by getting
lanman x implementations for the machines.  HP seems a little confused, however,
and thinks we want to buy the server and client software from HP.  We  already
have the client software installed, and have standardized on a basic
configuration.  My question is does anyone know how to get only the server
portion of the lanman/x software for hp machines so I cna make them fully
functioning members of our network?
 
Thanks in advance!
-- 

Regards.
 
Don Rolph  a722756@pan.mc.ti.com WD3 MS10-13 (508)-699-1263
From: paulp@hpfcdc.fc.hp.com (Paul Perlmutter)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:55:11 GMT
Subject: Re: How does 'mediainit -G' (guru mode :-) work?
Organization: HP Fort Collins, Co.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp


Please DO NOT use GURU mode.  You must be trained on that option before
use.  Don't even ask ...

Using unsupported disks (or non-referenced disks) must be done with care,
and with a full understanding that you do so at your own risk.  Most times
you will be able to plug in a third-party disk and successfully use it.
Mediainit *may* work.  You will have to make a new entry in /etc/disktab
(which has a set of instructions for doing so, at the beginning of the file).
HP goes to a lot of effort to qualify peripherals.  Because you hook up a
disk and can access it doesn't at all mean it works!  E.g.  what happens if
their are two disks on the system and they have a funny interaction problem
that occurs only once every several thousand transfers?  I've seen that
several times.  Or,  how does the disk report diagnostic or error information?
HP-UX may not be able to handle the data during error condition and not
properly recover.

A good starting point is to carefully read the disk's documentation.  Also,
the drive's manufacturer may have experience with your configuration.  If
you can access it from your system,  try running simple tests,  such as
read / write tests.   Also study the performance,  since that may give
valuable information about how well the drive is working.

Cheers,
Paul Perlmutter

PS. A very common and popular myth is that SCSI peripherals are "plug and play"
compatible.  Don't believe for a minute.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
From: Steinar.Haug@delab.sintef.no (Steinar Haug)
Subject: How can I send Ethernet packets from a user process?
Organization: SINTEF DELAB, Trondheim, Norway.
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 21:48:35 GMT

I'm trying to send Ethernet packets from a user level process, using the
interface defined in lan(7). The system is a 433s, running 8.0. I have tried
the examples in /usr/netdemo/LLA, and these work just fine. But as soon as I
try to send Ethernet packets instead of 802.3 packets, I get an EINVAL. What
I'm doing:

	- The machine has 2 ethernet interfaces. lanscan shows that lan0 is
	configured for Ether and 802.3, lan1 is configured for Ether only.

	- I'm trying to use the example from /usr/netdemo/LLA/nput.c, and
	substituting LOG_TYPE_FIELD instead of LOG_DSAP in the ioctl. The
	ioctl call returns EINVAL.

	- The Ether type field that I'm using is legal according to the
	lan(7) man page, it is *not* one of the reserved ones. I have tried
	several different Ether types, but always get the same error.

	- lan(7) specifies that EINVAL will be returned for several reasons,
	one of them being that a LOG_TYPE_FIELD was sent to an 802.3 device.
	I'm speculating that this may be what the system is trying to tell
	me, but I don't really know...

I have assumed that one simply needs to use LOG_TYPE_FIELD, and specify an
interface that has Ether encapsulation enabled, in order to send Ethernet
packets as opposed to 802.3 packets. Is there something else that needs to
be done also? Does somebody have a working example of how to send Ethernet
packets?

Steinar Haug, system/networks administrator
SINTEF DELAB, University of Trondheim, NORWAY
Email: Steinar.Haug@delab.sintef.no, 
	sthaug@idt.unit.no, steinar@tosca.er.sintef.no
From: mintz@hpindda.cup.hp.com (Ken Mintz)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 19:48:29 GMT
Subject: Re: HP-UX 8.07 bug causes crash (& related info on SO_LINGER)
Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp

> BTW, this is unrelated, but SO_LINGER doesn't work as the man pages claim it
> does (but then neither does the BSD networking code on which HP-UX's is based)

  socket.h and I believe the man pages were cleaned up for 9.0 to try to
  correctly reflect the operation of SO_LINGER.  I think you summarized
  some or all of it correctly, but let me just reiterate.

  (BTW, SO_LINGER is defined deferently for 7.0 than for 8.0 and 9.0.  The
  following is for 8.0 and 9.0.)

  If l_onoff is zero, close(2) returns immediately, but any remaining data
  in the send buffer will be sent before the TCP connection is closed.

  If l_onoff is non-zero and l_linger is zero, close(2) returns immediately,
  and any remaining data in the send buffer is flushed (not sent).

  If l_onoff is non-zero and l_linger is non-zero, close(2) will not return
  until all remaining data in the send buffer is sent.

  Note that l_linger is __not__ a measure of time, as it is not in 4.3BSD.
  4.4BSD does implement it as a measure of time, but it measures "ticks",
  not seconds.

-- Ken Mintz

DISCLAIMER:  This response does not represent the official position of, or
statement by, the Hewlett-Packard Company.  This response is provided for
informational purposes only and is supplied without warranty of any kind.
From: xm9@sdcc12.ucsd.edu (richard g. adair)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: Re: HP750 V HP827
Summary: SCSI
Keywords: SCSI
Date: 11 Dec 92 18:32:07 GMT
Organization: Arete Associates, San Diego

In article <RAYMOND.92Dec10001056@boa.es.ele.tue.nl> raymond@es.ele.tue.nl (Raymond Nijssen) writes:
>To the best of my knowledge, *differential* fast SCSI-II disks aren't any
>faster than non-differential fast SCSI-II disks.
>The `differentail' feature only applies to the electrical specifications of
>the signals on the bus, enabling longer cables, lower noise margins etc.

You are currect, that in theory differential SCSI doesn't add
speed.  In HP's case, however, the *card* is faster, according to
HP specs.  I guess the internal card is kept inexpensive, while the
add-on EISA card is a full-out performance beastie :-)

Why can't you get a non-differential SCSI card for EISA?

Tony Burzio
Arete Associates
San Diego, CA
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp,comp.windows.x
From: dbrooks@osf.org (David Brooks)
Subject: Re: HELP NEEDED : tvtwm with hp 700
Followup-To: comp.sys.hp,comp.windows.x
Reply-To: dbrooks@osf.org (David Brooks)
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 22:44:55 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.121026.5907@fct.unl.pt> jml@fct.unl.pt writes:
>	I tryed it first using flex and bison and it didn't wotk (but if you
>redirect stdin to the ~/.tvtemrc it will).
>
>	I tryed later using lex and yacc and it did! (Don't ask me why! I did
>not check!)

Yes, flex is different from Classic Lex.  It's a problem for OSF/1, as
shipped from us, also.

Rummage, rummage...Don't ask me to explain; I can't remember why this
works... 

*** /tmp/,RCSt1a02587	Sat Jul 18 11:12:21 1992
--- clients/twm/lex.l	Sat Jul 18 11:11:57 1992
***************
*** 29,34 ****
--- 29,35 ----
  /***********************************************************************
   *
   * $XConsortium: lex.l,v 1.62 89/12/10 17:46:33 jim Exp $
+  * dbrooks at OSF 7/17/92 fixes for GNU lex (flex)
   *
   * .twmrc lex file
   *
***************
*** 43,48 ****
--- 44,57 ----
  
  extern int ParseError;
  
+ #ifdef FLEX_SCANNER
+ int yylineno;
+ #undef YY_INPUT
+ #define YY_INPUT(buf,result,max_size) { \
+ 	int c = (*twmInputFunc)(); \
+ 	result = (c == 0) ? YY_NULL : (buf[0] = c, 1); \
+ 	}
+ #endif
  %}
  
  string				\"([^"]|\\.)*\"
***************
*** 87,93 ****
--- 96,104 ----
  				  ParseError = 1;
  				}
  %%
+ #ifndef yywrap
  yywrap() { return(1);}
+ #endif
  
  #undef unput
  #undef input
*** /tmp/,RCSt1a19537	Thu Jul 16 14:08:02 1992
--- demos/xgc/lex.l	Thu Jul 16 13:30:37 1992
***************
*** 10,15 ****
--- 10,19 ----
  #include "gram.h"
  #include "constants.h"
  
+ #ifdef FLEX_SCANNER
+ int yylineno;
+ #endif
+ 
  %}
  
  %p				4000
***************
*** 160,163 ****
--- 164,169 ----
  
  %%
  
+ #ifndef yywrap
  yywrap() { return (1); }
+ #endif

-- 
David Brooks					dbrooks@osf.org
Open Software Foundation			uunet!osf.org!dbrooks
Allberall und ewig blauen licht die Fernen!  Ewig... ewig... ewig...
From: tay@hpbbi4.BBN.HP.COM (#Michael Taylor)
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 14:27:39 GMT
Subject: Re: Graphics accelerator slow ?
Organization: Hewlett-Packard GmbH
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp

> simple things like 'ls /etc' or 'cat bigtextfile' in say, a hpterm take about
> three times as long on the fast machines !?
> 
> any tips ?

A graphics accelerator will improve the graphics performance of 3D stuff
like Starbase, but will slow X11 performance.

Pax,
Mike

#include <std.disclaimer>

From: zornow@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Claudia Zornow)
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 19:13:47 GMT
Subject: Re: Becoming super
Organization: HP SSD R & D
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp

I should have been more specific in my posting.  What I'm
really concerned with are programs that write to /usr/adm/sulog.
I'd like to know what programs do so, what format they write in,
and how widely available they are.  I'm supporting a program
that reads this file, and I'd like to know who or what can
put surprises in it!

Thanks,
Claudia
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
From: chuck@edsi.plexus.COM (Chuck Tomasi)
Subject: SAM can't do CDROM (9000/425T/8.0)
Organization: Enterprise Data Systems Incorporated, Appleton WI
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 12:50:39 GMT

I don't know if this is a FAQ, a bug that has been patched, or what, but
I thought I would mention it for the sake of letting people know what I
found.

I was attatching a CD-ROM to our 425T Wednesday and found that SAM
recognized that it was out there on the SCSI port waiting to be added as
a filesystem, however when I selected CDROM-SCSI as the device and told
it to go it complained about not being able to mount the device to the
directory (/UPDATE_CDROM).  After calling the response center we
determined that SAM had created the device files with the wrong minor
numbers.

It created the major numbers OK, but the minor number which should have
been 0x0e0300 came out as 0x030000.  After manually creating the device
files we were able to mount it and use update to load software.

-- 
Chuck Tomasi             |   Old programmers never die
chuck@edsi.plexus.COM    |   They just branch to a new address
MiSTie #2356             |   
------<Enterprise Data Systems Incorporated, Appleton Wisconsin>------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
From: prs9k@brain.med.virginia.edu (Phil Scarr)
Subject: xbiff on HP9000
Organization: Neuroclinical Trials Center, University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 18:37:09 GMT

Has anyone compiled xbiff successfully on an HP9000/730 or 827s?  We
need it for some of our X users who don't have real Xterms but use
Microsoft Windows with and Xserver.

	-Phil
-- 
PHIL SCARR        \      We are Microsoft...     /          (o) 804.243.0229
 University of    /     OS/2 is irrelevant.      \          (f) 804.243.0290
 Virginia,        \     UNIX is irrelevant.      /        prs9k@Virginia.EDU
 Neurosurgery     /     Openness is futile.      \     prs9k@Virginia.BITNET
 HP-UX is my life!\ Prepare to be assimilated... /   ...uunet!virginia!prs9k

Xref: sparky comp.sys.hp:14105 comp.unix.programmer:5704 comp.unix.misc:4590
From: herberj@prism.CS.ORST.EDU (John Wesley Herberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp,comp.unix.programmer,comp.unix.misc
Subject: Process path - where?
Date: 15 Dec 92 21:57:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: flop.1glkc7INNhi6
Distribution: world
Organization: CS Dept, Oregon State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: prism.cs.orst.edu


Could someone tell me how to get the full pathname of a process?  I've looked
through the header files & man pages & haven't found anything usefull.
u_dirp(user area) & p_rdir(proc table) = NULL.  

BTW, this is on a HP-UX 8.02 9000/8xx series.

All help appreciated,

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
John W. Herberg	     		      Internet: herberj@prism.cs.orst.edu
From: kjc@csc.liv.ac.uk (Kenneth Chan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: HP700s, XTerminals & Memory Question
Date: 11 Dec 92 13:25:22 GMT
Organization: Computer Science, Liverpool University

Fri Dec 11 12:48:58 GMT 1992

There was much discussion recently about whether a 700 box could support
15 XTerminals etc. The replies seemed to indicate that YES it was possible as
long as the 700 had sufficient memory (96Mb-128Mb) and maybe a fast disk ;
indeed some sites appeared to be running with a lot more than 15 XTerminals.

I have several questions ....

1. What sort of packages do the users (at these sites) typically run ? 
   We have experienced problems with 5 users on a 32MB 720 ; We believe this
   is because ...
   a. users run *LOTS* of different packages on different XTerminals but 
      executing on the same 700 box, eg different clocks, window managers 
      (twm,vue,olvwm), editors etc .
   b. users run *LARGE* packages (eg interleaf, teamwork, ingres) which eat up
      memory causing excessive swapping.

2. Will adding more memory help or is this a short term solution - sooner or 
   later that (extra) memory will be used up.
   
3. Does HPUX (for the 700s) swap AND page properly ? We can see lots of swap 
   activity but we do not think it is paging (ie it is swapping whole programs
   out rather than just a block) and this is the root cause of our performance 
   problems.

Any thoughts on the above will be much appreciated ...

Regards

Kenny C. (email: kjc@csc.liv.ac.uk)
         (phone(UK): 051-974-3690)

Kenneth Chan
Department Of Computer Science
University Of Liverpool
PO Box 147
Liverpool
L69 3BX
UK
From: mark@student.business.uwo.ca (Mark Bramwell CS STAFF)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: high speed modems (96k,1.44k) and hp9000?
Date: 14 Dec 92 20:25:27 GMT
Organization: University of Western Ontario

I am trying to replace a 2400baud modem with a v.42 9600  and or a 14,400fax
/data modem.

The 2400modem works fine.  I have tried to add some entries to gettydefs
to support  9600, 19200, 38400, and 56700.  These are the rs232 port baud 
rates supported by these newer modems.  I see data flowing, but nothing that I 
can read.

Maybe, I have to set the baud rate in the modem first? (the newer modems seem
to lock the rs232 baud rate once awaken and ignore line speed)

Has anyone successfully connected one of these things?  If so, what does you
gettydefs / inittab file look like, and did you program anything other than

ats0=1 in your modem?

I am using what I consider the standard off-the-shelf ready for your pc type
of modems.


mark@student.business.uwo.ca (Mark Bramwell CS STAFF)
Western Business School  --  London, Ontario
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
From: Scott Stevens <scott@truevision.com>
Subject: Re: Need Ftp site for popper 1.8 work with HP/UX 8.07
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 19:15:59 GMT
X-Xxdate: Wed, 16 Dec 92 14:31:10 GMT
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A754EE2E5401933A@scottmac.truevision.com>
Organization: Truevision Inc., Indianapolis, IN

In article <1992Dec14.162428.10791@hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk> Y. S. Lo,
augustine-lo@cuhk.hk writes:
>Hi, does anyone port the latest pop server (popper 1.8?) on HP/UX 8.07?
>Is there any ftp site I could get this from?

If you get an answer to this, I'd be interested in it too.

-- 
W. Scott Stevens (scott@truevision.com)
Truevision Inc., Indianapolis, IN
From: yngvi@rhi.hi.is (Yngvi Sigurjonsson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: How can I change HP 705 audio sample rate.
Keywords: audio
Date: 16 Dec 92 17:51:02 GMT


Is it possible to change the audio sample rate of HP 9000/705 without
using the Alib stuff, and if so how? 
I have found out that I can get the sampling rate with: 
ioctl(des,AUDIO_DESCRIBE,&ad)
The sys/audio.h file says that if the ad.sampling_rate is not 0 it is
fixed, is that true? 

Thanks in advance for any help.
-- 
 /| Yngvi Thor Sigurjonsson         |\ |\ ______________________/|
| | Fljotasel 17                    | || |   yngvi@rhi.hi.is   | |
| | Reykjavik Iceland               | || |_____________________| |
 \|_________________________________|/ |/_______________________\|
From: morgaine@siap.sublink.org (Nadia Pitacco (Morgaine))
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: Process memory usage
Keywords: HP-UX 8.07 virtual memory
Date: 11 Dec 92 15:27:34 GMT
Reply-To: morgaine@siap.sublink.org
Organization: SIAP Sistemi S.p.A.


  I'm using HP-UX 8.07 and I want to find which process is eating
  my memory. I need a way to find how much (virtual) memory is
  available and the amount of memory of each process.
  Under SunOS I use 'pstat -s' but on HP it doesn't exist.

  I've tried 'ps -elf' but it isn't what I want. 

  Any suggestions?
  Thanks in advance
                                                 Nadia Pitacco
-- 
	------------------------------------------------------------
	-  Nadia Pitacco                 SIAP Sistemi S.p.A.       -
	-  via Mercantesse 3 - 20021 Baranzate Milano ITALY        -
	-  E-Mail: morgaine@siap.sublink.org                       -
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
From: daves@hpcvusd.cv.hp.com (Dave Serisky)
Subject: Re: xterm and utmp
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, OR, USA
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 21:50:51 GMT

In article <Bz0M0H.6Br@helios.physics.utoronto.ca>, harrison@faraday.physics.utoronto.ca (David Harrison) writes:
|> We are running a locally modified xterm, originally hacked from a home-made
|> X11R4 on a Sun.  [Yes, I think we have a good reason for doing this, which
|> I will comment on to individuals who want to know.]
|> 
|> I attempted to move it to our HP9000/750 running HP-UX 8.07.  Worked fine
|> except that the /etc/utmp file wasn't being updated.  

Are you running xterm setuid root?  It can't update the file if it can't
write it.

|> So, thinks I, time to convert to X11R5 anyhow.  Got the HP unsupported
|> distribution from iworks.  It made beautifully.  Except the dead-stock
|> xterm from that distribution doesn't update /etc/utmp either.
|> 
|> I did a "strings ... | grep tmp" on the xterm shipped by HP.  It doesn't
|> have either "/etc/utmp" or "/etc/wtmp" in it; the X11R4 xterm I made from
|> source has both; the X11R5 one from source has only "/etc/utmp".
|> 
|> Can someone from HP or elsewhere comment on what's going on here?  I can
|> see a number of ways in main.c to fix this problem, but somebody has obviously
|> already done it for the shipped binary.  Can anybody share the "wheel" so I
|> don't have to re-invent it?

Depending on the release and how it was linked, it may or may not be
using shared libraries.  If it is using shared libraries (specifically
libc), there should be no reference to "/etc/utmp" in the file since it
is all handled by the SYSV lib calls (see getut(3C) for more info).

So, setuid root it and try it again...

-- Dave Serisky
   email - daves@cv.hp.com
From: hstroyan@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Howard Stroyan)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 18:36:14 GMT
Subject: Re: HP VUE Programers Guide
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp

In comp.sys.hp, Ian Kent <iankent@bnr.ca> writes:

> Does anyone know were I can find a soft copy of
> 
>   HP Visual UserInterface Environment Programmer's User Guide

Looking in the HP LaserRom I find this manual is online in the
September 1, 1992 release of the LaserRom CD (documenting HP-UX 8.05/8.07), 
but unfortunately it is not in the latest rev. of the LaserRom (Dec. 1, 1992)
(documenting HP-UX 9.0).  I'm not sure why.

If you can get a backcopy(?) of the Sept. CD it will have the manual
you seek.

It is under the "Series 700 8.05/8.07 Manuals": "HP VUE Programmer's Guide" 

--
Howard Stroyan                                         
Hewlett-Packard                                        hstroyan@fc.hp.com
User Interface Technology Division                     
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp