From: gplong@nyx.cs.du.edu (George Long)
Subject: Re: COMPETENCY
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 18:04:32 GMT

In article <2188@blue.cis.pitt.edu> psg+@pitt.edu (Paul S Galvanek) write
:
>In article <93019.161532RSF109@psuvm.psu.edu> RSF109@psuvm.psu.edu write
:
>
>>  of the election.  However, I have to be patriotic and accept the fact
>>  that our country will be "run" by a democrat.  I have to accept it bu

>>  I do not have to like it.  
>
>
>NO you don't have to accept it.  When Bill didn't like the governments
>actions he found way to oppose them and undermine their administrions
>and we can do the same thing.
>
>The patriotic thing to do is to look toward the example that Bill set
>for us and be as disruptive and cause as much trouble as we can (of
>course as conservatives we'll do so with in the law - unlike Bill)
>The patriotic thing to do is find ways to force Bill Clinton to keep 
>his promises; when he introduces tax legislation aimed at the middle 
>class we can organize mass demonstrations, have public burning of tax
>forms, sit-ins that shutdown government offices, massive write-in 
>campaigns to Congress, demonstrations.  
>
>Come on people don't roll over for this socialist scum bag, stand up and

>fight.  Make Bill Clinton eat every promise he made, through the power 
>of you voices!  Let's here it from the 57 million that voted against
>Bill Clinton, oppression of the majority by the minority can last only
>if we allow it, all together now...
>
>
>WE SHALL OVER COME YOU, BILL, 
>WE SHALL OVER COME!!!
>
>
>PSG 
>-- 
>Industrial Policy: Phrase suggesting a Soviet style of		| Time magazine 
>		   selective tax breaks and trade protection    |  Jan 18 1993
>		   Seldom used by the Clinton team.              ---------------
>Sector-Specific Strategies: Term used by the Clinton team.  Indsutrial P
licy.



 Whoa! Wait a minute!  Either Mr. Galvanek has decide to follow the
 advice of my previous post...

 ...or he is changing his position to suit his arguments.  Hmmmm.....

 In a previous post, Mr. Galvanek was quite adamant about having no
 recourse to the law, and no power to represent himself or to change
 the government now that Clinton is in power.

 That was then, this is now...

 "NO, you don't have to accept it."

 "...make Bill Clinton keep his promises."

 "WE SHALL OVERCOME YOU..."

 Hey, I support the right of a person to blatantly flip-flop on 
 positions (don't call this "pulling a Clinton" -- it's not clever),
 but someone has to call Mr. Galvanek on it.

 What does he really mean -- can Clinton opponents do anything about
 the situation or can't they?

 Oh, and by the way , Paul, I don't think that you would get much
 support for calling a malicious disruption of a presidential 
 administration "patriotic."  Maybe its just me.                
 
 Next time, try constructive debate and accountability instead of
 empty rhetoric and name-calling.



 The friendly liberal monitor,

 GPL