HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pisherwo@wm.estec.esa.nl (Phil Isherwood)
Subject: DAEMONS on Tomorrow's World
Reply-To: pisherwo@wm.estec.esa.nl
Organization: ESA/Estec/WMS, Noordwijk, The Netherlands
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:04:53 GMT

Last night, the BBC's popular science programme, 'Tomorrow's World'
did a piece on the restoration of The Daemons. They showed how the
colourization had been done in their usual "science is simple" way.

They also sported a few Doctor Who props for atmosphere: the Tardis,
the Tardis console, Bok the gargoyle's mask and more.

Basically, it was being used as a plug for the repeat of The Daemons,
which begins on BBC2 tomorrow evening.

That's all folks !!

Phil Isherwood
pisherwo@wm.estec.esa.nl
From: kausch@med.umich.edu (David Kausch)
Subject: Who'd make a good Who?
Originator: kausch@brador.math.lsa.umich.edu
Organization: University of Michigan, Mathematics Department, Ann Arbor
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:17:39 GMT


Instead of Sly Stallone or (give me a break) K Costner, how about the 
vivacious William Hurt?  Or worse yet, Patrick Swazye?
From: aa634@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bill White)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Who'd make a goo Who?
Date: 16 Nov 1992 23:48:15 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aa634@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bill White)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, jasstev@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (stevens jason) says:


[original text deleted; It dealt with Jeremy Brett making a great
Doctor]

>
>	MMM...this is a widely held view in British fandom (Brett was voted 
>	the fans favourite two years back I think) but this is a bigggg
>        mistake. Why? Brett may be a very good actor but HE IS Sherlock
>	Holmes, I cannot see hi Dr being wildly different, nor - and this is
>	the important bit -- could I see the audience identifying him as the
>	Doctor, because he is Sherlock Holmes (Exactly my problem!)
>	The choice of Brett would be a total disaster for the ratings in a
>	new show.
>	A sensible and affordable choice of a tv detective is John Thaw,
>	what do you think of that?
>

Here's another name to throw into the pot. How about Gareth Thomas
as the Doctor?  Opinions?


--Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself; but talent instantly
  recognizes genius.
                           --Dr. John H. Watson
-- 
Bill White, aa634@Cleveland.freenet.edu OR aa037@Medina.Freenet.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------
       Assistant Sysop, Cleveland & Medina County Free-net's
                  Science Fiction and Fantasy Sig
From: aa634@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bill White)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Tissue Compression Eliminator (was Re: The Master)
Date: 18 Nov 1992 01:32:42 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aa634@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bill White)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc12.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, Ric_Goldman@3mail.3com.com () says:

>
>Actually, the Tissue Compression Eliminator (sic?) appears as early as  
>"The Deadly Assasin" used by Pratt's Master on video technician and the 
>incompetent Chancellor guard.  But I think it falls in the category of 
>the sonic screwdriver - a trademark tool, not a trademark of the
>characterization.
>

The TCE appears even earlier than that. It in fact appears in the
very first Master story "Terror Of The Autons". Dont you remember
the Doctor finding the missing technician shrunk down inside his 
lunchbox?


--Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself; but talent instantly
  recognizes genius.
                           Dr. John H. Watson
-- 
Bill White, aa634@Cleveland.freenet.edu OR aa037@Medina.Freenet.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------
       Assistant Sysop, Cleveland & Medina County Free-net's
                  Science Fiction and Fantasy Sig
From: fjohnson@furs.rutgers.edu (Floyd Johnson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Who'd make a goo Who?
Date: 20 Nov 92 14:24:01 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

norbeck@procyon.bucknell.edu (She Who Must Be Obeyed) writes:


>I still think Colm Meaney (ST:TNG's O'Brien) would be an excellent
>Doctor.  He's of the right nationality, even.  I met him at a con last
>summer and he really has the right personality for it as well.

Why didn't I think of that?

My silly picks for a film version would've been Sean Connery (maybe
too massive), Pierce Brosnan (sort of ironic), or James Doohan (too
many "repair" sequences would result). 

I think Nancy scores a direct hit with hers. As for James Earl Jones,
he might make an interesting nemesis. That voice of his is perfect for
another incarnation of the Master.

Now how about COMPANIONS?
-- 
*******************************************************************************
"Where's the 'Kaboom!'? There was supposed to have been an Earth-shattering
'Kaboom!'"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: le@cs.tulane.edu (Doug Le)
Subject: What happened to Sylvester McCoy??
Organization: Computer Science Dept., Tulane Univ., New Orleans, LA
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:00:19 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host-[nntpd-12072]: sinbad



What has happened to him?????  Why is everybody picking a new Doctor???
From: quiz@nemesis.UUCP
Date: 18 Nov 92 20:46 CST
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Quiz 10 REPEAT - Dr. Who Quote Quiz
Message-ID: <-403729@nemesis>
From: otten@quark.umd.edu (Neil Ottenstein)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: PLanet of the Daleks
Date: 19 Nov 92 18:06:43 GMT
Organization: /etc/organization

Thanks for the summaries of what I missed in Planet of the Daleks.  I
still don't understand why in the movie format they didn't just include
the black and white episode anyway.  It might have felt a little
jarring, but it is better than not having it at all.

Thanks again,

Neil Ottenstein
otten@quark.umd.edu
From: wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: CBS FOX VIDEO/Doctor Who
Date: 18 Nov 92 10:28:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.1992Nov18.102830.22604
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando

I made the distribution NA since people elsewhere don't care...

scottg@amiganet.chi.il.us (Scott Gittlitz) wrote:
>Scheduled for release in Febuary/March:

>The Tom Baker Years
>Daleks: The Early Years
>Cybermen: The Early Years
>(Title yet to be announced) - probably Claw of Axos or Earthshock

I'll add on the list of already released videos. Someone e-mail me what is
on The Pertwee Years since it has already been mentioned several times.
Anyone want to take over this list when I depart Usenet? (I don't think Dave
took this into account in his reorganization(?), although it's in the FAQ)

CBS/FOX Doctor Who video releases

Ep?=episode format, LD?=laser disc
 
Title                        Ep?  LD?   Comments
-------------------------    ---  ---   --------
An Unearthly Child            Y    N
The War Games                 Y    N    2 tapes
The Three Doctors             Y    N
Curse of Fenric               Y    N    Contains extra footage
The Hartnell Years            -    N    Contains: pilot for An Unearthly Child
                                                  The Crusade (3)
                                                  The Celestial Toymaker (4)
                                                  other misc. clips
The Troughton Years           -    N    Contains: The Abominable Snowmen (2)
                                                  The Enemy of the World (3)
                                                  The Space Pirates (2)
The Tomb of the Cybermen      Y    N
Shada                         Y    N    linking narration by Tomb Baker
Caves of Androzani            Y    N
The Pertwee Years             -    N    Contains: ?
 
The Seeds of Death            N    N
Spearhead from Space          N    N
The Day of the Daleks         N    Y
The Time Warrior              N    N
Death to the Daleks           N    N
The Ark in Space              N    N
Revenge of the Cybermen       N    N
Terror of the Zygons          N    N
Pyramids of Mars              N    N
The Brain of Morbius          N    N    edited down to 60 mins
The Deadly Assassin           N    N
The Robots of Death           N    N
The Talons of Weng Chiang     N    N
The Five Doctors              Y    N    it's only 1 episode anyway

Tom
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: PLanet of the Daleks
Date: 18 Nov 92 05:15:42 GMT
Article-I.D.: vidiot.4447
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout

In article <1992Nov17.024419.7132@cs.ucf.edu> wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson) writes:
<otten@quark.umd.edu (Neil Ottenstein) wrote:
<>This weekend I just saw Planet of he Daleks and I was wondering what the
<>details are about the "missing" episode in this story.
<
<#3 is not missing. It is B&W and is not shown as part of the movie version.
<Some places that show episode format MAY show it (I don't know that). Part
<of #4 is edited out to because it follows from #3. Basically, the episode
<revolves around the Doctor's escape from the Daleks. If you'll remember that
<he is captured and then somehow miraculously is out when he runs into Jo.

I have taken the movie version and edited back in the pieces that were edited
from episode 2 and 4.  Of course, I edited back in episode 3, even though it
was in B&W.  The editing was done on 3/4" Umatic equipment.

The thing to note about the movie is that not only were pieces edited out
in episodes 2 and 4, but pieces were actually rearranged.  After seeing the
completed version, one wonders why the B&W section was edited out.  We know
why it was done, but it shouldn't have been.
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: psrought@eos.ncsu.edu (PATRICK SCOTT ROUGHTON)
Subject: Re: Who'd make a goo Who?
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:24:01 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.105255.1384@dct.ac.uk>, mcsdc1gs@dct.ac.uk writes:
|> 
|> 	With reference to all the names who've been put forward
|> 	regarding who'd make a goo Dr Who... personally, I'd like
|> 	to see Sylvester McCoy continue. I'd also like to see what
|> 	Colin Baker could do with a few half-decent scripts and a
|> 	better costume! I think Colin would surprise quite a few people
|> 	if he was given better material to work with.
|> 
|> 	If none of these were possible, I think Ron Moody would make a
|> 	good Doctor.
|> 
|> 	But that's just my 'umble opinion... 

	I haven't seen the list, but I think Jeremy Brett would make
	a great Doctor.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Dracula
Date: 18 Nov 92 05:26:53 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <Bxu1EI.JBp@acsu.buffalo.edu> perl@acsu.buffalo.edu (David T Perl) writes:
>
>
>I'm not sure that Sean Connery would make a good Doctor Who.  I think that he 
>would give the doctor too much of a physical aspect.  Connery is used to 
>playing the action adventure type.

Well, Jon Pertwee was a comedian before Who.  Bill Hartnell always played
drill sergeants.

Connery's proved that he's very good at non-action-oriented roles -- 
Professor Jones in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Marko Raimius,
Ramirez from Highlander (well, OK, he was a sword-fighter in that one,
but his main focus was being a mentor-figure)...  I think it would be
great, except that it'll never happen.

Connery can be cerebral (remember Russia House?  Professor Jones again?),
witty, able to handle action scenes, and he's got that Tom Bakerish sort
of PRESENCE when he speaks.  Ah, if only...
From: v115p8d6@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (she listens like her head's on fire..)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: ADRIC'S DEATH..IT WAS MOVING!!!!
Summary: fff
Date: 17 Nov 92 14:55:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: acsu.Bxv841.E2H
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <Bxovn7.J2D@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, jasstev@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (stevens jason) writes...
> 
>    The next scene of sudden realization from
>    tegan and Nyssa, and the Doctors stunned silence, and finished off with
>    those marvellous quiet titles. It was moving, despite what some fans say
>    (or cheer, or laugh about)
> 
I agree. I started watching Dr. Who with Tom Baker and I had never seen
any of the main characters killed. It was quite a shock and it was moving.
I was very impressed with the way the final credits were handled.

>    Admittedly Adric was not the most popular character but earthshock had 
>    me gripped from beginning to end.

so what if he's not popular! I always liked him.:-)
> 
>    The only other scene which impressed me for emotion was Nyssas tearful
>    farewell on Terminus.

The episode where Jo left was sad as well. The Doctor seemed to be really
affected by her leaving.
> 
>    So there.
>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: mrmuon@next06csc.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins)
Subject: Re: Happy Anniversary!
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 04:24:13 GMT

I checked for the exact time in my copy of the twentieth anniversary  
magazine which has a picture of the original Radio Times schedule  
anouncement. It's 5:15 pm Greenwich meridian time, which translates, I  
believe, to 12:15 pm eastern standard time.
Annoyingly, I have a class then, but I'm thinking of perhaps suddenly  
shouting, "Twenty-nine!" or something. I wish I had had a chance to get my  
meagre collection of Who pins from home...
Pity about JFK though.

--
Eli Hawkins : mrmuon@wam.umd.edu
"You say you can't fit one of your larger buildings into one of your  
smaller sitting rooms?"
         - Doctor 1, "An Unearthly Child"  (wording approximate)
From: 1-1@tardis.cojones.com (Peter W. Losher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Yeah, I read that in a fanzine  . . . 
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 92 00:59:02 GMT

 Regarding Message : Re: McCoys portrayal of the Doctor
 Written By        : ph9991_manfr@rivers.acc.uwrf.edu

> Also, did you know that Sophie Aldred was _25_ when she got the part,
> thus 27 by "Survival," and now 30?

     . . . I was shocked when I heard that . . . I thought she was 23 when she
got the part . . . But 30 this year!! . . . That took a lot of getting used to
. . . :)

-Keeper Of The Matrix-

AT&T.SYS corrupt . . . Reboot with Sprint ? ? ?

  The Matrix: Doctor Who BBS  (209) 571-0347  Modesto, Ca  TARDISNet 1@1 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: "daniel bishop" <daniel.bishop@canrem.com>
Subject: ace? more like deuce... h
Reply-To: "daniel bishop" <daniel.bishop@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 16 Nov 92 22:10:17 EST

Hey Drewcifer.....

.....Obviously, this thread has not died.  You may have tried to kill
it, but it only regenerated.  So, as long as it's alive and kicking,
I'll throw in my $.02 worth.

I'd have to agree with you that Leela and Ace have little in common.  I
still don't hate Ace though; having little in common with Leela is true
for a lot of companions.  I'm not sure that Leela counts as an alien.  I
know that the Tesh have well and truly departed from the *homo sapiens*
fold, but Leela, while a regressive human, is arguably as human as any
aborigine anywhere.  I mean, the Sevateem were *situationally*
primitive, not *genetically*, witnessed by the fact that Leela married
Andred.  How many Gallifreyans would marry an incurable savage (since
there is little evidence of a Gallifreyan sex drive, the obvious answer
is moot)?
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: Dave Horlick <drh2@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: the five doctors
X-Xxdate: Fri, 20 Nov 92 15: 07:18 GMT
Nntp-Posting-User: drh2@cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell University
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d7
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:04:07 GMT

Perhaps the second doctor was guessing or bluffing. If he knew from the
Three Doctors that the third doctor was exiled to Earth by the TimeLords,
he might have anticipated the TimeLords dealing with his companions by
altering their memories. Remember, the second doctor didn't believe the
wraiths to really be Zoe and Jamie, so maybe he just improvised a reason
why they couldn't exist to challenge them.

I haven't seen the Two Doctors in a while: how is it explained there that
Jamie recognizes the Doctor? Is he supposed to be from before the War
Lords episode?
From: alan@cowan.edu.au (A.SALTER)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: drwho in australia
Date: 20 Nov 92 20:20:51 GMT
Organization: The University of Western Australia
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: scorpion.ac.cowan.edu.au

Does anybody out there know when dr who returns to australian screens
and at what time, date etc !!!!!!!


most appreciative if someone could reply !!!
From: timelord@cs.mcgill.ca (Jeffrey JACOBS)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Women Doctors  (was Re: Who'd make THE BEST Who???)
Summary: Yes, now it can be told!
Date: 23 Nov 92 13:28:19 GMT
Organization: The Query Master Syndicate.

In article <pnz1m9#@rpi.edu> danaf@rpi.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov19.183320.10554@lsa.umich.edu>, kausch@med.umich.edu (David Kausch) writes:
>|> 
>|> possibilities, but if a Gallifrian could regenerate in the
>|> opposite sex, why
>|> would they have the terms "time-lord/time-lady?"  This terminology

They have nevre used the term Time Lady in the show.  Lady, yes, but
never "Time Lady."  It is only the Time Lords.  Trust me.  They don't
call me the Time Horse, do they?  NO!  I'm the Time *Lord.* You see,
we Gallifreyans are beyond the petty sexual distinctions that you
humans tend to invoke.

>|> may all be 
>|> the fault of some 1960's writer for the BBC, but let's ignore that, let's

Time Lord was first introduced in The War Games, 1969, Terrence Dicks
and Malcolm Hulke.  Since these were some of the founding fathers of
Doctor Who cannon, I'd tend to not dispute them.

>NO!
>
>I don't feel that the Doctor could be played by a woman. I just feel that a
>Time Lord (or Time Lady, the two not overlapping...) cannot regenerate to a
>member of the opposite sex. It doesn't seem that the series implied this in 
...
>concept of love between the opposite sex. Imagine if Leela woke up one day to
>find that her husband is now a woman! Or if Susan's husband (I forget both of
>the guys' names...) discovered that she's suddenly become a man! It would be

Leela + Andred:  Andred was a Capital Guard, and NOT a Time Lord.
Hence, your supposition that he could regenerate is unfounded; we have
no idea either way, and hence he is a bad example.

Susan + David Campbell + Q = Guinan:  Oops.  Sorry, that's a different
post.  But again, we have no real proof that Susan is either a Time
Lord OR a Gallifreyan.  All we have is that the Doctor is her
Grandfather, but since we have no proof that the Doctor had any
children, we can't be sure if this was a term of affection.

Further note:  We have NEVER seen REAL Time Lords (tm) engaged in any
form of real love-relationship.  Not even Strella.  (Ooops, what a
give-away!)  Not only that, but I'd like everybody that still believes
that gender determines sexual preference to go watch Star Trek: The
Next Generation - The Host reruns a few hundred times, if only just to
play: "Yeah, I see Cheryl Gates McFadden's kid!  Under the smock!"

No potatoes here!
(Just a few lemmings.)
-- 
   (%)   By order of the High Council of Time Lords on Gallifrey   (%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The world is too much with us."  |  And The Dark Horse     ~,-;`
   ---   William Wordsworth       |              Rides On           TX TL
From: G.M.Suddes@newcastle.ac.uk (Gareth Suddes)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Classic Comics #1      (SPOILERS)
Date: 16 Nov 92 15:11:41 GMT
Organization: University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, NE1 7RU


 Issue one of DWM's sister publication emerged last week and I've got to say I
enjoyed it. It featured two complete Pertwee stories and the first 4 eps of a
third. The artwork was very good, and for the majority of the time the Doctor
did look like Pertwee, much better than some of the recent McCoy likenesses,
although the new Sontaran strip in DWM looks very promising.

  The first story was the Gemini Plan which was pretty interesting, and I
suspect it influenced The Twin Dilemma in some way too, although probably
subconciously. The colourisation of the strip seems to have been a great
success, (assuming it was B&W on first printing). Let's hope the Daemons has
been done as well. Only four days to go now!!!!

  The second story (Timebenders) was interesting too although featured a very
weak ending. Nice to see such an Enterprising character in there though :-)
 The Doctor travels back to WWII and becomes entangled in a plot by the Nazi's
to win the war by using modern weapons

  The third story is The Vogan Slaves, which seems very promising. The Vogans
in question are no relation to the Planet of Gold Vogans of Revenge of the
Cybermen BTW, but they do bear a STRIKING resemblance to Dan Dare's Mekon
friend. I'm sure the colourers wanted to paint them green instead of the dark
blue!!!

  A couple of nice articles about the creation of Sixties strips and the
continuation of The Daleks, this seemed a good opener for the series, although
overpriced at 2.50. (pounds) 7 out of 10. Oh, nice cover by Alistair Pearson.

 At last I can start ticking off some more titles in the Terrestial Index.

Gareth
________________________________________________________________________________
\ "You are now entering the Justice Zone. Beyond this point it is impossible   /
 \  to commit any act of injustice."                                          /
  \__________________________________________G.M.Suddes@newcastle.ac.uk______/
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: david@donald.concordia.ca (David Gaudine)
Subject: Re: Ace we love you (well, some of us)
Organization:  ORGANIZATION!! HERE? You must be kidding
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 22:15:20 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.191534.29873@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik) writes:
>In <13554@ecs.soton.ac.uk> lm89@ecs.soton.ac.uk (McIlhoney L) writes:

>>At the beginning and in the most recent time, the Doctor is an antihero,
>>which is why we need characters like Ian, Barbara and Ace to be our
>>representatives.  Anyone can see that.
>
>WHAT??????  Now, I didn't follow this up in order to argue over Ace.  I'm
>through with that, even if everyone else isn't done putting their two cents
>in.  But I will DEFINITELY argue with the Doctor being an antihero.  Explain
>yourself, please!  Give me your definition of an antihero as well, so we can
>debate this intellectually.

Well, you've got to admit that in early episodes the Doctor wasn't always
a very nice guy.  In "An Unearthly Child", when the others decided to
help an injured caveman the Doctor reached for a rock, with villanous
intent I believe.  And wasn't he going to kill Barbara and Ian in
"The Edge of Destruction"?  But, I don't understand why anyone would
call Ace's Doctor an antihero.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Gaudine, Concordia University, Montreal.  david@donald.concordia.ca
From: billw+@pitt.edu (William R Wilkinson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Stallone buys TARDIS
Date: 15 Nov 92 21:59:15 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: University of Pittsburgh


  Or perhaps Tim Quinn and Dicky Howlett were a little closer to the mark than
we ever suspected? :-)
    (For those who haven't seen the "Doctor Who?" strip I'm thinking of, from
the early eighties, it's got a number of alternate regenerations of the Doc,
including Sly (as opposed to Sylv!) With a Tom-Baker-esque scarf slugging an
"Earthshock" cyberman, stating "Dis guy has a glass jaw!"  Another one had
Ronald Reagan looking in a mirror "I've regenerated my hair, now for the rest of
me!"
        Bill Wilkinson, LAMMA Tamer