From: liz@pitt.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A racist rears her ugly little head
Date: 18 Dec 1992 15:29:16 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: pitt.wpi.edu
Keywords: cute newsgroup name...

Glad to see our friend here is good to her word...she did post my personal
e-mail.  Took a lot of things out of context, of course, and didn't 
post the half where I blew her out of the water...

In article <BzE4oA.CEv@world.std.com> rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) 
writes:
>From: liz@wpi.WPI.EDU (Liz Stewart)
>Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 17:53:30 -0500
>Message-Id: <9212162253.AA03182@bigwpi.WPI.EDU>
>
>>>No doubt, but that's exactly where the problem lies -- you don't
>>>know what you are talking about.  The "best of your knowledge" 
>>>is both parochial and pathetic.  All you do is recite the same
>>>old bigotry that you've heard someone else spout.  You might at
>>>least be interesting if you could offer some original thought
>>>on this subject but so far all you've done is run around like a
>>>chicken with it's head cut off screaming, "PC! PC!"
>>*I* recite the same old bigotry? 
>
>Yes -- the nonsense you've been babbling here is nearly 30 yrs old.
>

Um, yeah...that's why everyone on the net is flaming me for it, right?
Seems to me that on the original thread, *you've* been the only
one to flame me "seriously".  If it's such nonsense, why aren't
I getting my ass toasted by all of a.f. for the enjoyment of the
entire net.world?

>>majority tells me to think.  If that makes me a bigot and a racist,
>>then so be it.

What I said here was - I think for myself, and don't just think what the
majority tells me to think.  If that makes me a bigot and a racist,
then so be it. 

Besides, if I though the way that the majority thinks, I would be
racist.  If you disbelieve this, then why do we need affirmative
action laws anymore? 

>No, what makes you a bigot is the fact that you believe in and up-
>hold racist thinking.  That you are either not intelligent enough
>or old enough to figure out for yourself why the beliefs you cur-
>rently hold are racist tripe.

Uh, rather not.  I don't think that people of other races are any less
intelligent, attractive, etc. than Caucasians.  (I'll be PC about
this since it seems to be the only thing you can understand.)  If
I'm such a racist, then how could I possibly make the above statement?
I think you're seeing things that you want to see.

>>  But I've noticed that you haven't answered the charges
>>of those who have similar ideas such as me. 
>
>The only other articles I have seen from anybody with similar ideas
>"such as you" (sic) on this subject have been from Patrick Humphrey
>and I didn't bother to respond to his "charges" because nothing he 
>wrote had any relevance to what I wrote.  

Right.  He just refuted things that you said about me.  It has nothing
relevant to do with what you said.  Right.  And my sky is magenta.

And there were others.  Shall I look them up and post them again,
together, so you'll get the point?  Sheesh...


>Nah, you're just the latest in a long line of a.f toys, Liz.  It's
>too bad you're going away, though, that startled-deer-caught-in-the
>-headlights look that appeared on your face when I started respond-
>ing to you was most amusing.

Did you pass reading comprehesion?  I'm going home for *break*.  Notice
the .edu header?  Hmm...

>>And I am most definitely *not* PC...political correctness is rather
>>silly, in my eyes.
>
>PC's in the eye of the beholder, hon.  And you certainly do seem to
>see it everywhere you look.

Yah, I'm totally PC.  

Lesse here....she says I'm racist.  She also says I'm PC.  So, PC people
are racist as well.  Wait a minute....

Get a clue, get a life, get some sense.

					--Liz

--
deal with it, pink boy
Newsgroups: alt.flame