HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jogle@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (Jim Ogle (Ks. Jim))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Mann & Machine
Date: 9 Apr 92 06:49:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: zia.1992Apr9.064932.2363
Organization: National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro NM

In article <1992Apr8.193644.20883@mlb.semi.harris.com> cbh@opus.mlb.semi.harris.com (Cherie R. Slasor) writes:
>In article <1937@ra.nrl.navy.mil> ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil (G. Host) writes:
>>
>>> Article <1992Apr7.074533.14289@zia.aoc.nrao.edu> From: jogle@nrao.edu (Jim Ogle (Ks. Jim))
>>
>>> >keep watching it, though. Any deficiencies in last night's ep were redeemed
>>> >for me by that line about "Drs. Scott, Deckard, Ford, and Hauer", though! :-)
>>
>>> !!! I missed that (but sound quality on tv is pretty bad around here)....
>>
>>I got the line
>>  Scott == Montgomery Scott, Chief Engineer of the Enterprise,
>>  Deckard == Bladerunner,
>>  Ford == Harrison Ford/Bladerunner (or Ford motor company :-) )
>>  but who is Hauer?
>>
>
>Hauer = Rutger Hauer/the android from Bladerunner

Scott was probably a reference to Ridley Scott, who directed Blade
Runner.


-- 
Kansas Jim (Jim Ogle, Torg guru)
jogle@nrao.edu (NRAO-VLBA, Socorro New Mexico)
"I'd be apathetic if I cared."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: sdt8s@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Stephen Daniel Tilson)
Subject: Re: WHAT WAS THAT??!!
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 18:35:05 GMT

In response to my own query above: the shi--uh, show was called
(ha ha ha) STEEL JUSTICE. May there be much of the same for its
producers.

Steve
--
You will survive...surviving by exposing yourself to the hazards...taking 
the risk successfully until no enemies are left: and then you will become
your own enemy, that the proud battle may go on: all others conquered,
there will remain only yourself to be conquered...(Carlos Fuentes)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: edgar@function.mps.ohio-state.edu (Gerald Edgar)
Subject: sleepwalkers
Organization: The Ohio State University, Dept. of Math.
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 12:39:15 GMT


"Eerie, Indiana" had the whole town sleepwalking this week.  It made me
wonder:  where did this TV and movie convention begin, where somnambulists
hold their arms out horizontally in front of them?  Presumably
it started in some movie, and then was copied again and again...
--
  Gerald A. Edgar                Internet:  edgar@mps.ohio-state.edu
  Department of Mathematics      Bitnet:    EDGAR@OHSTPY
  The Ohio State University      telephone: 614-292-0395 (Office)
  Columbus, OH 43210             -292-4975 (Math. Dept.) -292-1479 (Dept. Fax)
From: albert@chain.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Rick Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Quantum Leap / USA Today
Date: 16 Apr 1992 14:19:54 GMT
Organization: Baylor College of Medicine

In article <304@romana.Tymnet.COM> sally@romana.Tymnet.COM (Sally 'Lucky Bitch' Smith) writes:
>In article <1992Apr15.231639.8508@zia.aoc.nrao.edu> jogle@nrao.edu writes:
>(like, wow, spoilers, OK?)

>Lemme check with my sources and get back to you, OK? I gotta make my
>weekly call anyway.

	Well, the Houston Chronicle ran something in their entertainment
section saying the same thing.  Of course, they may have gotten their
info from USA.

	Leaping into Tom Selleck sounds interesting, if nothing else,
but Oswald (EEP) and Hannibal the Cannibal (DOUBLE EEP)??? 
	Say it ain't so!
-- 
Rick Jones				Systems Support Center
albert@bcm.tmc.edu			Baylor College of Medicine
Voice: 713-798-7352			standard disclaimers apply
GEEZ Mahn, I'm surrounded by amateurs!- Sebastian (the Little Mermaid)
From: rhardcor@HELIOS.UWSP.EDU (Randy Hardcorn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Max Headroom
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:36:40 GMT


Does anyone have any of the episodes of the US Version of the Max Headroom
TV show on tape? If so, I would like a copy of them.. I have been trying
to find them for some time now. If you would like to copy them for me, send
me E-Mail. I can provide the blank tapes for copying.

Thanks mucho

  --Randy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: plucky@irie.ais.org (Chris Adamson)
Subject: Re: Mann & Machine
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 92 12:03:11 EST
Organization: ACME Looniversity

In article <1992Mar31.133820@jupiter.csee.usf.EDU> clark@jupiter.csee.usf.EDU (Matthew Clark) writes:
>|> 
>|> Any thoughts out there on this new show?
>
>
>	Ida know...this series sounds like a real Stink-a-roozer.  Visions of
>"Automan" come (in horrific clarity) to mind.
>
	...and "Manimal", and "Misfits of Science", and "Knight Rider"...

	As a grad student in Media Arts (read TV Production), I wrote
a LONG (25 pp.) paper on the history of sci-fi television, and found that
programs largely fit into two earlier-established categories:  CRIME
DRAMA and FRONTIER (WESTERN) DRAMA.  The former, which I find far
less interesting, is just a variant on the usual cop shows, with sci-fi
elements usually enabling an agent of justice with unique powers.  The
latter provides a forum for a portrayal of societal values in conflict,
allegories about contemporary society, etc... MUCH more interesting.

	With the exception of "V" and "Star Trek", guess which kind
NBC has always bought into?

	Hint:  this is the same network that blew itself out of the
increasingly popular/profitable TV animation market by buying such
winning programs as "Pro Stars" and "Wishkid Starring Macaulay Culkin".

	Moral of Story:  If it looks like science fiction, and it's on
NBC, it's going to be another stupid cop show.

> ________  ______   _   _   
>|_   _|  \/  |   \ | | |_|   EEEEEEEE XX   XX PPPPPPP   OOOOOOO
>  | | |      |  \ \| |  _    EE        XX XX  PP    PP OO     OO
>  |_| |_|\/|_|_| \___| |_|   EEEEE      XXX   PPPPPPP  OO     OO
>clark@galadriel.csee.usf.edu EE        XX XX  PP       OO     OO
>clark@jupiter.csee.usf.edu   EEEEEEEE XX   XX PP        OOOOOOO

    =================================================================
   / Chris L. Adamson    / This message has cost the net hundreds, /
  / Michigan State U.   /  if not thousands, of dollars to send.  /
 / Telecomm Production / --------------------------------------- / 
/ M.A. student        / plucky@irie.ais.org , plucky2(Amer. O-L)/
================================================================
DISCLAIMER:  MSU wishes it could be so erudite and clever...
From: "dale clayton" <dale.clayton@canrem.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: sfan cover letter
Date: 11 Apr 92 02:08:56 EST
Reply-To: "dale clayton" <dale.clayton@canrem.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Canada Remote Systems

Troy H. Cheek wrote:
--------------------
-> I find myself in possession of information regarding a letter-writing
-> campaign to designed to aid the start of the Science fiction,
-> Fantasy, and Adventure Network, hereafter referred to as SFAN.
[more omitted]

 That sounds rather interesting, but what else will SFAN have to offer.
You make it sound like all SFAN is interested in is StarTrek, anything
else is secondary.
 Hmm...24 hours a day of 'StarTrek oriented' programming. No, thanks.
The Sci-fi Channel seems to have a broader idea.

Regards,
Dale Clayton
------------------------
dale.clayton@canrem.com
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario/Detroit, MI
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: ABC Axes Indy!
Date: 9 Apr 92 16:00:18 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

In article <cole.702785056@lea>, cole@lea.csc.ncsu.edu (Robert Cole) writes:
>>>>ABC has canned THE YOUNG INDIANA JONES CHRONICLES.

> After tonight's episode, there was a voice-over saying that the show
> would return later this year with all new episodes.

But this is because they have already been filmed...unfortunatly the
show could still be cancelled.  :-(

Greg Bole	                    Maid Marian: "Why, you speak treason!"
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu         Robin Hood: "Fluently"
                                    From _The Adventures of Robin Hood_
From: eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu (Virany Margaret Kreng)
Subject: Re: QL: Famous people
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 15 Apr 92 01:26:02 GMT

I've been keeping track of the posts on Famous people in Quantum Leap, but
I could only think of one that hasn't been mentioned... Try to follow along
here because I may get confusing.

In the episode "Vietnam" or something like that, where Sam is with his 
brother in Vietnam as the platoon's good luck charm, he meets a photographer
named Margaret (no last name).  At the end, Margaret dies getting her
Pulitzer photo (hope I'm not ruining this for anyone).  On Entertainment
Tonight they did a story about a photographer named Margaret (Can't remember
her last name, though) who was the first female photographer to be killed
in a war. The Margaret from the episode was wearing the same style hat as
the real Margaret was in a photograph they showed, and the character-Margaret
died in the exact same way as the real-Margaret.  Coincidence?  Probably not.

Virany Kreng
eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu

************************************************************
* "I don't want to sell anything, buy anything, or process *
* anything as a career.  I don't want to sell anything     *
* bought or processed; or buy anything sold or processed;  *
* or process anything sold, bought, or processed; or       *
* repair anything sold, bought, or processed.  My father's *
* in the army.  He wanted me to join, but I can't work for *
* that corporation.  So what I've been doing lately is     *
* kickboxing."       -- John Cusack, SAY ANYTHING          *
************************************************************
From: rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Mann & Machine -- YAR (Review)
Date: 8 Apr 92 17:31:51 GMT
Reply-To: rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Dept., Madison, WI

In <1992Apr7.160144.8960@ncar.ucar.edu> jsloan@ncar.ucar.edu (John Sloan) writes:
>				The show has the same flaw as most SF series,
>including ST:TNG, etc. These shows consistently (IMHO) fail to show the
>full implications of the technology they propose. Taking M&M as an
>example, if you could actually create an android as portrayed, then
>I suspect:

>o       If such a machine costs millions or billions of dollars, then
>	it wouldn't be used in law enforcement, but would be part of
>	some deep black DoD/Intelligence program.

>o	If such a machine merely costs hundreds of thousands of dollars,
>	then the technology used to create it would be ubiquitous.
>	We'll virtually have to assume this, since it appears that
>	these machines are not a closely held secret.

These two points make me think of the Six Million Dollar Man.  Think we'll
see Mann and Eve fighting other (evil) robots in the future?  If the show
lasts long enough, I'd be willing to lay money on it.  And I bet we'll see
it more than once.

But who knows.  Maybe they'll hire William Gibson as script editor. :-)

>o	Artificial limbs would be a reality, not just to replace lost
>	human limbs, but also to augment existing limbs. Sames goes for
>	eyes, ears, all the sensory appratus. Humans could be vastly
>	altered, repaired, improved. No evidence of this.

Speaking of the Six Million Dollar Man! :-)

[...]
>I realize it's just a T.V. show, but one of the things I like about
>_good_ science fiction literature is that authors usually know enough
>to create a fully realized world, complete with the implications of
>the new technology they propose.

Or else come up with way to circumvent having to think of such things.  Such
as Data's origins on ST:TNG (created by a genius whose work no one has
been able to duplicate).

-- 
Michael Rawdon
rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department, Madison, WI

"...I trusted [Ganelon] like a brother.  That is to say, not at all."
				- Roger Zelazny, _The_Guns_Of_Avalon_
From: rsopicki@pro-amber.cts.com (System Administrator)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Mann & Machine: Second Episode
Date: 14 Apr 92 03:16:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: crash.1992Apr14.031620.23774
Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA

Gosh, I'm glad its not only me! I'm really enjoying this offering to the
max. Its an easy to watch piece of fluff.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ProLine:  rsopicki@pro-amber         |        System Administrator
Internet: rsopicki@pro-amber.cts.com |                of
UUCP:     crash!pro-amber!rsopicki   |             Pro-Amber
CIS:      75146.430@compuserve.com   |           619-460-9762
From: E7A8HAR@TOE.TOWSON.EDU ("TOM HARRIS, REGISTRAR'S OFFICE")
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: UFO (ITC?)
Date: 9 Apr 92 19:38:00 GMT


	Does anyone have info on the old British show "UFO"? I used to 
watch it when I was very young. It dealt with the infiltration of extraterr-
estrials and S.H.A.D.O.(sp?), an organization that was supposed to intercept
the "ufo's" . 
	I understand that some/all of the episodes are now available on
laserdisc. Is this true? Can they be obtained on VHS? Anybody have an
episode guide? 
					-Tom
E7A8HAR@TOWSONVX.BITNET
From: SCOLVIN@CLEMSON.CLEMSON.EDU ("Silverthorn Wolf")
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: The Tommorow People
Date: 8 Apr 92 03:16:00 GMT

Topic: The Tommorow People & The Third Eye
That is great to hear about The Tommorow People, I really liked the
original show. Has anyone ever seen The Third Eye which also used
to show on Nick., about the same time an er as the Tommorow People?
If anyone has information about The Third Eye, please let me know|

                      Silverthorn Wolf
                      scolvin@clemson.clemson.edu
P.S.Farwell Isaac Asimov| I am sorry to see you go. :( *sniff*
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Wednesday, 15 Apr 1992 12:54:53 EDT
From: Rick Thibeault, UMPI <RICK@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Mann & Machine: Second Episode
 <1992Apr8.193644.20883@mlb.semi.harris.com> <1992Apr12.062531.20214@uwm.edu>
 <92104.005214SML108@psuvm.psu.edu>

Date: Monday, 13 Apr 1992 00:52:14 EDT
From:
Subject: Mann & Machine: Second Episode

>Well I didn't catch the pilot because I was out of town, but I have to admit
>I liked the interaction between the two main characters in the show in this
>episode.  Also, The Abelard Dating Service was a great joke if you know a
>little history and also kind of gave away the killer immediately.  Peter
>Abelard was a French theologian who couldn't control his urges for a certain
>woman, but he couldn't marry her either or he would be defrocked.  He treated
>her shabbily until one day he was castrated by her relatives in the night and
>she was ultimately sent to a convent.  This was one seriously screwed up guy
>who rants on and on in his writings about his higher calling being inhibited
>by his earthly urges.  I can't hate a show that brings an obscure reference
>like this into it as a clue.

Also if You know anything about the history of the actor(can't think of his
name), he was on a show last summer (The Antagonists) which had the same
story premiss only in reverse(sort of).

Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.tv:1326 rec.arts.sf.written:5557
From: petersm@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU (Marguerite Petersen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Isaac Asimov Sonnet
Date: 8 Apr 92 07:56:30 GMT
Organization: CS Dept. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

I have not been a poster in this newsgroup but I have been an avid
reader for a couple of months.  I hope you will not consider this
little sonnet an imposition.  I entered a contest way back in 1979
sponsored by Isaac Asimov.  The project was to write a Shakespearean
Sonnet as an acrostic.  The theme was anything to do with Science
Fiction.  I wrote a Star Trek Sonnet and lately have written 8
others.  I felt compelled to write this one tonight.  I sit here
with glass of sherry in hand and say, "Isaac.  This one's for you!"



                    SCIENCE FICTION


          Somewhere around my fourteenth year or so

          Conveniently, I cannot be precise

          I came upon a friend at school and though

          Exteriors diverse, we shared a vice.

          No one could have forseen the coming change

          Content were we to sit upon our duff

          Even then we knew that we were strange
     
          For girls to like to read that "awful stuff"

          I loved imagining huge ships in space

          Considered what strange worlds might be "out there"

          Toward the stars I soared while in that place

          Inside the magazines, "amazing", "weird".

               Of all the writers I'm enamored of

               No one can equal Isaac Asimov

                              Marguerite K.A. Petersen


In Memoriam to Isaac Asimov, Science Fiction Writer par
excellence.


Marg
petersm@jacobs.cs.orst.edu
a.k.a. Elvira
From: jogle@nrao.edu (Jim Ogle (Ks. Jim))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Quantum Leap / USA Today
Date: 15 Apr 92 23:16:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: zia.1992Apr15.231639.8508
Reply-To: jogle@nrao.edu
Organization: National Radio Astronomy Observatory

In article 302@romana.Tymnet.COM, sally@romana.Tymnet.COM (Sally 'Lucky Bitch' Smith) writes:
>In article <9204151523.AA17579@rutgers.edu> IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU ("Slow-Children@Play") writes:
>>USA Today; Wednesday, April 15, 1992:
>
>(article deleted)
>
>Y'know, putting a SPOILER on this might have been nice -- a lot of
>people might not have wanted to know that.

Sally, you're not saying this stuff is true, are you?  The first one, yeah, you've
talked about before but the others?  The last one made me think someone's
about two weeks late with his post....

---
Kansas Jim (Jim Ogle, Torg guru)
jogle@nrao.edu (NRAO-VLBA, Socorro New Mexico)
"I'd be apathetic if I cared."
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
From: mblum@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Cerebus)
Subject: Re: 2 oldies
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 19:56:41 GMT

sjs@hood.hood.caltech.edu (Stephen Speicher) writes:

>These are two simple old ones - but cute.

>1. Consider the sequence O T T F F . .
>   What are the next two letters - and why?

>2. Consider the letters H I J K L M N O
>   There is a one-word solution to this.


These two are *really* old, but I'll do 'em anyway:

1. S S -- they're the first letters of the first natural numbers, one
two three four five six seven.

2. Water.

-- Matt
+------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
|  Matt "Matt" Blum            | "Hello.  My name is Oedipus.  You are    |
|                              |      my father.  Prepare to die."        |
| mblum@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu  |                                          |
|                              | I am not politically incorrect.          |
|  (617)736-5878               | I am politically challenged.             |
+------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
From: boll@CS.ColoState.EDU (dave boll)
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
Subject: Rolling dice
Date: 13 Apr 92 15:03:12 GMT
Organization: Colorado State University, Computer Science Department



  Another dice puzzle:

  You have in front of you a 6 sided dice, with the 'one' face 
  showing. In how many ways can you roll it so that you see all
  six faces in sucession, with no repeats?

  In case the above description isn't clear, I'll describe it in
  more detail:
    The top face currently shows a one. You have 4 choices; you
    can roll it to 2,3,4, or 5 (the 4 adjacent faces of 1). Let's
    say you roll it to 2; you now have 3 choices: 3,4, and 6.
    Each move you roll the dice to an adjacent, unvisited face.

  OK, that was pretty EZ. What if you did it on graph paper, starting
  with the dice at (0,0) - which square(s) is the ending place for the
  most roll patterns?

  Anybody care to tackle the dodecahedron and iscosahedron (sp???)
  These could even make an interesting two player game; first player
  unable to roll the dice to an unvisited face loses (or wins).

  Enjoy.

-- 
     ------------------------------------------------------------
     Dave Boll  boll@handel.cs.colostate.edu
                "The speed of time is 1 second per second"
     ------------------------------------------------------------
From: meng@idt.unit.no (Tore Mengshoel)
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
Subject: Re: The Philosopher's Puzzle...
Date: 12 Apr 92 12:32:04 GMT
Reply-To: meng@idt.unit.no (Tore Mengshoel)
Organization: Div. of CS & Telematics, Norwegian Institute of Technology

In article <1992Apr9.122034@IASTATE.EDU>, macster@IASTATE.EDU (Michael C Mccarty) writes:
|> 	Now that I've calmed down a bit about 'Dying Young' puzzle, I've just
|> remembered another problem that I came across a while back that is sort of
|> related to that puzzle.  I haven't been reading this newsgroup for very long so
|> I hope this one hasn't been done before. 
|> 
Sorry to shatter your hope; it has been done recently, then as the
three wise men, having either a white or red spot on the forehead,
knowing there to exist at least one white spot, everybody receiving white.
|> 	Imagine you are one of three philosophers sitting under a tree in the middle of
|> a nice meadow.  All of you fall asleep under the tree.  Meanwhile a group of
|> birds come to perch in the tree while you are sleeping.  The birds then proceed
|> to sh*t on all three of your heads.  You all wake up simultaneously and, while
|> none of you can feel the sh*t on top of your head, you all burst out laughing
|> because you see sh*t on the others heads.  Now assuming that none of you noticed
|> who the others were looking at when they started laughing, and that none of you
|> bother to feel your head (pretty big assumptions, I know, but please, bear with
|> me), how can you determine that you have sh*t on your head?
|> 
|> 	I must note that this isn't really much of a puzzle but it is a good refresher
|> course in good, clear, logical thinking (which I think some of you are in dire
|> need of).
|> 
|> 				Logically yours,
|> 				Mike
|> 
|> I have no .sig (sigh).

Tore
From: stig@Lise.Unit.NO (Stig Hemmer)
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
Subject: Re: A simple number puzzle
Date: 10 Apr 92 10:18:42 GMT
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology

[I dropped soc.culture.indian from the Newsgroups. Hope you don't mind]

In article <1992Apr7.202400.26466@Cadence.COM>, hemmady@Cadence.COM 
(Shankar Hemmady) writes:
> The puzzle goes as follows:
> 
> "My child's age raised to itself gives my age.
> If my wife is younger than me by my child's age
> and if we are LIVE humans, then what are our ages?"

As any good UNIX hacker knows time is measured in seconds.

Your wife's age when she had your child (x**x - x - x) should be in the range
2**28 to 2**33 (These limits are rather wide but are the closest round numbers)

Then x must be 9 which means that you are 387420489 and your wife 387420480
seconds old. Naughty children!

Stig 'Tortoise' Hemmer   aka   stig@lise.unit.no
.no means Norway, a minor kingdom in northern Europe.
Europe is a moon of Jupiters.
This is NOT a .signature virus. Do NOT copy it into your .signature
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
From: sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart)
Subject: Re: wierd birthdays
Summary: ask a silly person, ...
Organization: silly answers R us
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 17:37:32 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.151236.18195@clpd.kodak.com>
benham@anion.serum.kodak.com (Todd Benham (x37354)) writes:
>I am 15 minutes older than my twin brother (actually, I dont have a brother
>but let's pretend) but according to our birth certificate's time of birth my
>birthday comes one day after my twin brother's and
>in different years.  How did this happen (and when are our birthdays)?

To have the birthdays on different dates is easy, even different
years:  You were born towards the end of Dec. 31, your brother toward
the beginning of Jan. 1.  But you're older, and your date of birth is
later; therefore, your mother must have been on a ship crossing the
International Date Line in between your births.

The simplest explanation is therefore a typo on your birth certificate.

Seth		sethb@fid.morgan.com
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles