HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rrogers@watson.ibm.com (Ryan Rogers)
Subject: Rodney Dangerfield as Sherlock Holmes
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 18:35:57 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.11a by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: rrogers@watson.ibm.com (Ryan Rogers)
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

   Did anyone see the HBO (I think...) comedy special Dangerfield's?
It had a couple skits with Rodney as Sherlock...they were quite amusing
(in Rodney's own, sick way).  :-)


--
Sincerely,
Ryan Rogers
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: Ann.Feeney@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Ann Feeney)
Subject: Re: A&E Sherlock Holmes Week
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 18:41:29 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.141721.8209@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> tom@arthur.jsc.nasa.gov (Tom Robinson) writes:
>For all of you rabid Sherlock Holmes fans out there -- this week the A&E
>network is running Sherlock Holmes EVERY night.  I've always though that
>Jeremy Brett is the quintessential Holmes... opinions?
>
>Incidently... I've been wondering when this group would appear.  Now
>then, does anyone out there like Lovejoy too?
>
>THE GROUP IS AFOOT!


Loved the Lovejoy books, but don't get cable, so haven't seen the series.
Question about Lovejoy, btw--do any antique people (that came out wrong
;-) ) know how reliable his information really is?  I've caught one
flagrant oops (refers to netsuke as sword guards) and was wondering if he
was as bad with others.
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: dsmythe@netcom.com (Dave Smythe)
Subject: Re: Taping (was Re: Baker Street (comic))
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 07:10:09 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <1992Sep14.110819.25235@access.digex.com> huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston) writes:
>In article <BuJB25.EKD@acsu.buffalo.edu> camurphy@acsu.buffalo.edu (Cindy) writes:
>>Funny how they're offering the whole Holmes tv series
>>for about $100 when anyone with a vcr and some blank
>>tapes could have it for substantially less.  :)  
>
>P.D. James has said that mystery fans tend to be more law-abiding than the
>average person.  While the Supreme Court has sanctioned time-shifting, the
>recording of copyrighted materials for an archive remains illegal. 

This is untrue.  You simply cannot profit by doing so (e.g., sell copies).
HBO has even actively encouraged it's subscribers to tape the movies in
advertisements not too long ago.

D

-- 
========================================================================
Dave Smythe   N6XLP    dsmythe@netcom.com (also dsmythe@cs.stanford.edu)
From: sane@cs.uiuc.edu (Aamod Sane)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
Subject: Re: Red-Headed League
Date: 10 Sep 92 19:12:27 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL

Chuck.Lavazzi@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Chuck Lavazzi) writes:

>In article <1992Sep10.154107.3264@ra.oc.com> mvick@hp835.mitek.com (Marty A. Vick) writes:
>>
>>pans across the street to show Moriarty (sp?) looking
>>over his should at them both.
>>
>Moriarty at the Reichenbach Falls.  Moriarty doesn't appear in the original
>story of "The Redheaded League" at all.

Does not appear, but is mentioned. The scene in the vault
is in the story.


Aamod Sane

QOTD:

"We've been following your progress with considerable interest, not to
 say contempt. " --- Zaphod Beeblebrox IV
-- 
sane@cs.uiuc.edu
         ==         / \  
-----    ==    *    \_/     -|||- 
         ==     
Xref: sparky alt.fan.holmes:72 alt.sex:28861
From: Chuck.Lavazzi@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Chuck Lavazzi)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Sherlock's secret love-life Was: So, which Holmes is it?
Date: 10 Sep 92 13:42:06 GMT
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service

In article <boh.716098226@sfu.ca> boh@fraser.sfu.ca (Changhao Boh) writes:
>scafati@thor.med.ge.com (Victor-charles Scafati) writes:
>
>>Watson was married _twice_.  While this in itself does not make him exclusively
>Hmm.. I know he married the heroin of "The Sign of Four" -- Miss Morstan.  But
>where is there mention of his 2nd marriage ?
>
	The business of the second Mrs. Watson is more implied than explicit
in the Canon.  There is a period after Watson's marriage to Mary Morstan
during which he is away from Baker Street, followed by a period during which
he is once again resident there.  There is a reference during this period to
"his recent bereavement" or something similar, clearly implying the his wife
was deceased.  But in later stories he is clearly married again.  Hence the
implication of a second Mrs. Watson, about whom we really know very little.
[...]
>However, may I defend Sherlock in
>the sense that he hardly exibited any respect for man either !
>
	I'l quibble with this to some extent.  Holmes didn't have much
respect for pretense, but I don't think he was down on the human race as
a whole.

>Good Health.
>
>Changhao.
Chuck
No .sig, no frills, no foolin'



--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: dsmythe@netcom.com (Dave Smythe)
Subject: Re: Brett IS Holmes ...
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 06:48:47 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <9SEP199214040424@ctrvx2.vanderbilt.edu> diwadkva@ctrvx2.vanderbilt.edu (Vaibhav A. Diwadkar) writes:
>The subject heading is indicative of my views.
>
>I cannot imagine watching another actor play Sherlock.

How about the same actor playing someone else?  For a little cognitive
dissonance, check out JB as Eliza Doolittle's worshiper from afar in
My Fair Lady...  (he sings, if I remember correctly)

D

-- 
========================================================================
Dave Smythe   N6XLP    dsmythe@netcom.com (also dsmythe@cs.stanford.edu)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder)
Subject: Re: So, which Holmes is it?
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 13:00:03 GMT

In article <TORKEL.92Sep9205128@bast.sics.se> torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen) writes:
>In article <16868@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> beard@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu 
>(Patrick C. Beard) writes:
>
> >Jeremy Brett's portrayal is slightly effeminate.
>
>  Really? In what way?

I couldn't give you a listing of those tendencies, but I completely
agree with Patrick.  Not that it bothers me in any way, but I do agree.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Schroeder	                |  Warning: prolonged exposure to this
schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov         |  .sig may cause retinal damage and 
Brookhaven National Laboratory  |  blistering skin rashes. 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: wrp@pslsrv1.gvl.unisys.com (Bill Pringle)
Subject: Re: Sherlock's secret love-life Was: So, which Holmes is it?
Organization: Paramax Systems, Ivyland, PA
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 04:43:30 GMT

In article <BuDs0I.8B0@agora.rain.com> trifid@agora.rain.com (Roadster Racewerks) writes:
>In article <unixwiz.716098471@mcl> unixwiz@mcl.ucsb.edu (Silk) writes:
>
>Doyle was at times very inconsistant about his characters' finer details. In
>his references to Watson he seems to have forgotten about his first wife at
>some point (probably when he got bored and tried to kill the stories) and where
>his old gunshot wound was, leaving real die-hard Holmes/Watson fans making
>up all sorts of scenarios as to how there could be two Mrs. Watsons. (I think
>he was a bigamist, myself...;-> and that he had been wounded more than once in
>India. Doyle also got Holmes' bathrobe color wrong...and other little things.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Another theory I remember hearing was that he was wounded in a spot between
the shoulder and the leg.  Perhaps in a part of the anatomy that was not
normally mentioned in literature of the times ....
----------------------------------------------------------------
>After all, the series ran for *years*, and was so popular Doyle had to make up
>a way to bring Holmes back from the grave...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Not to mention that he made up such a *ridiculous* story when he brought
Holmes back to life.  Doyle had killed off Holmes because he didn't want
to write about him any more.  It was keeping him from his *real* works
of literature such as "The While Compay."
============================================================================
Bill Pringle                      Software Tools
Paramax Corporation               Voice: (215)443-7500 X4023
Internet: wrp@ivy.unisys.com      UUCP: ...!uunet!mimsy!widener!gvls1!wrp%ivy
From: Ann.Feeney@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Ann Feeney)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
Subject: Re: Shocked ...
Date: 13 Sep 92 20:24:47 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service

I recall reading an interview with Jeremry Brett (okay, okay, interview
_of_), in which he said that he wanted to depict Holmes as breaking the
habit of cocain use.

I don't get to watch the series as often as I'd like--did this ever happen?

Ann
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: ejh@colorado.edu (Edward J. Hartnett)
Subject: Re: Shocked...
Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado
Distribution: usa
Date: 9 Sep 92 13:20:43

In article <1992Sep9.163035.15364@nntp.uoregon.edu> eric_gorr@coglab_psych.uoregon.edu (Eric Gorr) writes:

   From: eric_gorr@coglab_psych.uoregon.edu (Eric Gorr)

   Well, after exhausting all of the interesting (IMHO) SF books, I decided to
   start reading mysteries and felt that there was no better place to start
   then with the master himself.  

   When you first started to read holmes, were you as shocked as I was that he
   was a drug user (cocane and morphine) in the novel The Sign Of Four?  

   This totally blew my whole conception of the man when I read it.  

   Yes, I am aware that there is either very little or no mention of it in
   later novels and stories - allowing us to assume that he "kicked" the
   habit.  Thank goodness.  Did Arthur Conan Doyle use drugs at one time? 
   What that the reason for the appearence in the novel?

God, another drug-warrior. Firstly, the reason that S.H. is such a
memorable character is that he has depth, problems, flaws. He's not
your typical know-it-all, chisled-looks, strong-yet-sensitive,
geek's-superhero character. He is troubled by his frantic brain, so
troubled that he has to resort to drugs unless he has an interesting
case. 

Secondly, at the time those stories were written there had not yet
been the gigantic 'drugs are evil (except for alcohol and tobacco)'
propaganda campain that we are now subjected to. Cocain and morphine
were legal, though their abuse was frowned upon. (Incedently, I
recently read that the doctor of Lincoln's widow prescribed marijuana
for her, to help her deal with her 'nerves').

Thirdly, there is no evidence in the stories (as far as I recall - I'm
sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong) that he ever stopped using
drugs. He refers to his drug use in several stories.


--
Edward Hartnett			ejh@khonshu.colorado.edu

Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: ECZ5SER@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU (Mike Randall)
Subject: Re: ???...? Re: Baker Street Irregulars
Date: 11 Sep 92 14:15:27 PDT

In article <1992Sep11.080606.15910@rdg.dec.com>, on 11 Sep 1992 08:06:06 GMT,
uli@cats.muh.dec.com (OOOO - Open Object-Oriented Ogre) writes:

>Baker Street Irregulars?
>Sherlock Holmes Society of London?
>Sherlock Holmes Journal?
>Baker Street Journal?
>..?
>Would some kind soul please post references (adrresses, prices,...)
>Thanks in advance!

Here is latest I have. Prices may have gone up.

Baker Street Journal

Fordham University Press
University Box L
Bronx, NY 10458-5172
$15

The Sherlock Holmes Journal

Sherlock Holmes Society of London
c/o Cdr. G.S. Stavert
3 Outram Road, Southsea
Hampshire PO5 1QP ENGLAND
$15

Mike Randall
Xref: sparky alt.fan.holmes:124 alt.sex:28956
From: morse@satie.cs.unc.edu (Bryan Morse)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Sherlock's secret love-life  Was: So, which Holmes is it?
Date: 10 Sep 92 16:57:10 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.holmes
Organization: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

In article <1992Sep9.200613.21634@mr.med.ge.com> scafati@thor.med.ge.com (Victor-charles Scafati) writes:
>
>I must say that Sherlock exibited a profound lack of respect for women.  

Are you discussing his opinions or his treatment of women? Holmes 
exhibited the high respect that any Victorian gentleman would have 
for a lady.  He was outwardly kind and gracious in his treatment of 
women.  Lack of interest, perhaps, but not a lack of respect.

True, he did refer to them as unstable and difficult to understand,
but I don't think this indicates a lack of respect as much as a typical
(stereotypical) male opinion/frustration.  

-- 
Bryan Morse                University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
morse@cs.unc.edu           Department of Computer Science
From: beard@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu (Patrick C. Beard)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
Subject: Re: A&E Sherlock Holmes Week
Date: 9 Sep 92 17:18:09 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis

In article <1992Sep9.141721.8209@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> tom@arthur.jsc.nasa.gov (Tom Robinson) writes:
>For all of you rabid Sherlock Holmes fans out there -- this week the A&E
>network is running Sherlock Holmes EVERY night.  I've always though that
>Jeremy Brett is the quintessential Holmes... opinions?

I have to agree. He's the perfect acetic, drug-addicted, intense man that I
always visualized while reading the books. Basil Rathbone was my first exposure
to Holmes and he always put me to sleep. I've seen almost all of these
Granada television productions and really like them. "The Sign Of Four" has
been my favorite. Does anybody know where the soundtrack to the show can
be purchased? A friend of mine had the CD a while back. Even the theme sounds
like something Holmes would have played.

Patrick Beard
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: ccgwt@trentu.ca (Grant Totten)
Subject: Re: So, which Holmes is it?
Reply-To: ccgwt@trentu.ca (Grant Totten)
Organization: Trent University
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 14:46:05 GMT


In article <bxsntfl.dsmythe@netcom.com>, dsmythe@netcom.com (Dave Smythe) writes:
>>In article <1992Sep9.160010.25061@trentu.ca> ccgwt@trentu.ca (Grant Totten) writes:
>>Speaking of Sherlock Holmes, this is Sherlock Holmes week on A&E!  Heaven!
>
>Uh, yes.  Sherlock == heaven.  A&E sucks the big one.  They always talk over
>the last credits with the assinine Lovejoy ads, and the have commercials at

I *like* Lovejoy!  A&E between 9 and 11 is where you will find me on Monday night!  :)  It also helps that my fiance is currently studying Art
Conservation.

>stupid times, often.  I have been taping the Jeremy Brett David Burke/Edward
>Hardwicke (sp?) shows for a long time now, and they are much better when 
>they come off Disney or PBS.  I'm actually taping them on top of my old
>Basil Rathbone/Nigel Bruce tapes...

I've only seen one or two of the Rathbone shows.  Must say I wasn't all that
impressed.

[...]

>>I liked the nice touch at the end when Holmes is putting the Carbuncle in
>>his desk, he places it between his cocaine syringe and the photograph of
>>"the woman".  :-)
>
>Question: how could Holmes keep it "for his museum" and still have a 
>          plausible reason to get Horner (?) released?
>

I don't know - I thought that a little strange myself.  Anyone care to come
up with a justification?

>I saw a recent interview with Jeremy Brett, and he says he wants to do
>all of the stories eventually, so it looks like they should keep coming
>if they can find funding.
>

Good news indeed.  Almost makes you want to pay to support A&E, eh?  ;)

>D
>
>-- 
>========================================================================
>Dave Smythe   N6XLP    dsmythe@netcom.com (also dsmythe@cs.stanford.edu)
>

GT

Grant Totten, Programmer/Analyst, Trent University, Peterborough Ontario
GTotten@TrentU.CA            Phone: (705) 748-1653   FAX: (705) 748-1246
========================================================================
New systems generate new problems.
From: mjm@beach.cis.ufl.edu (Michael Murphy)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
Subject: Re: A&E Sherlock Holmes Week
Date: 14 Sep 92 15:57:32 GMT
	<ROBERTS.92Sep10144831@studguppy.lanl.gov>
	<11SEP199213272808@moose.cccs.umn.edu>
Reply-To: Michael Murphy <mjm@reef.cis.ufl.edu>
Organization: The Bookhouse Boys
In-reply-to: rao@moose.cccs.umn.edu's message of 11 Sep 92 18:27:00 GMT

Sherlock Holmes?  Shit, i thought this group was for JOHN Holmes fans.
Oh well.
--

"Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball."
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: kencham@ulysses.cs.umn.edu (Deepak)
Subject: Re: So, which Holmes is it?
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 15:28:35 GMT

HURRAH !!!! A Sherlockian Newsgroup, at last. Who ever took pains to
get it voted @ alt.config, my gratitude to you !!!

I suggest we change the name of the group to alt.fan.sherlock-holmes 
or the like, else fans of O.W.Holmes etc. would tend to clash.

Hope there is enough enthusiasm.For starters, any comments on the .sig ?

\kerd
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherlock Holmes observed that ".. After you have eliminated the impossible, only the possible, however improbable, remains..". I, however, do not like to elimin-
ate the impossible. And so I believe, Holmes and Watson were gays.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston)
Subject: Re: Lists
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 19:30:56 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.193833.28799@news2.cis.umn.edu> jill@gopher.ccbr.umn.edu (Jill Hollifield) writes:
>Could someone please post a list of Sherlock Holmes novels, short stories,
>and good basic references for a newbie just discovering the wonderful
>world of Arthur Conan Doyle?

For the whole works, go for _The Annotated Sherlock Holmes_ by William S.
Baring-Gould (ISBN 0-517-502917).

-- Herb Huston
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: sane@cs.uiuc.edu (Aamod Sane)
Subject: Re: Shocked...
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 19:05:09 GMT

whitney@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (David Whitney GDP) writes:

>In article <1992Sep9.163035.15364@nntp.uoregon.edu>, eric_gorr@coglab_psych.uoregon.edu (Eric Gorr) writes:
>|> When you first started to read holmes, were you as shocked as I was that he
>|> was a drug user (cocane and morphine) in the novel The Sign Of Four?  
>|> 
>|> This totally blew my whole conception of the man when I read it.  
>|> 
>|> Yes, I am aware that there is either very little or no mention of it in
>|> later novels and stories - allowing us to assume that he "kicked" the
>|> habit.  Thank goodness.  Did Arthur Conan Doyle use drugs at one time? 
>|> What that the reason for the appearence in the novel?

>Kicked the habit?  In almost every story it seems Watson is mentioning his
>vice of cocaine "to relieve his mind of stultifying boredom in between
>cases".  It surprised me too, but the more I read, the more it's just another
>part if him that makes him so unlike any other person.  He's Sherlock Holmes.

I seem to remember 
other Victorian literature considering cocaine use a little eccentric,
indulged in by the intrepid explorers, gentlemen adventurers and so on.
It was the day of exotic eastern poisons, pigmy's shooting darts,
and of reading about dangers in the "Times".

The threat of drugs was less immediate, I think.
When the Leary's made cocaine and drugs common, and one could see
lives being destroyed, drugs became dangerous as opposed
to "fashionably risky".
-- 
sane@cs.uiuc.edu
         ==         / \  
-----    ==    *    \_/     -|||- 
         ==
From: unixwiz@mcl.ucsb.edu (Silk)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
Subject: Baker Street Irregulars
Date: 9 Sep 92 21:39:02 GMT

I've heard that there is actually a group of Holmes fans called the
BSI...Could anyone out there comment on this?

I've not been able to track down any other Holmes group, but I'm not sure
If its the fact that I'm in the colonies or what...

So, please, I would appreciate it greatly if someone could put me in touch
with on of these groups.

Ken
unixwiz@mcl.ucsb.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston)
Subject: Re: Shocked ...
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 09:46:38 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.193836.7155@reed.edu> jkiparsk@reed.edu (Jonathan Kiparsky) writes:
>In article <1992Sep9.183018.21589@research.nj.nec.com> yoko@research.nj.nec.com (Yoko Ozawa) writes:
>>eric_gorr@coglab_psych.uoregon.edu (Eric Gorr) wrote:
>>What bothered me more back when I was a child was that Holmes seemed
>>to kill people a lot and not be too bothered about it.... There was
>
>I can't think of a single case, offhand, of Holmes or Watson killing anyone.
>There are murders, and people die in accidents, but I think the pistol which
>Holmes always had Watson bring along was "just in case."

Oh, how about Carlo, the mastiff, and The Hound?  Watson seems to have been
the better marksman, as he dispatched the former with one shot, whereas 
Holmes required more than one to hit the latter.

>Oh, there was Moriarty, but that was something of a special case.

Praiseworthy!

-- Herb Huston



Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: beede@sctc.com (Mike Beede)
Subject: Re: Watson's Second Marriage / Holmes asexual?
Organization: SCTC
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 12:16:16 GMT

misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel) writes:


>says:  "The good doctor had at that time deserted me for a wife, the
>only action I can recall in the history of our acquaintance."

I think we should stuff ``selfish'' into there between ``only'' and
``action.''

	Mike


-- 
Mike Beede         Secure Computing
beede@sctc.com     1210 W. County Rd E, Suite 100           
------------------ Arden Hills, MN  55112
                    (612) 482-7420
Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes
From: mvick@hp835.mitek.com (Marty A. Vick)
Subject: Red-Headed League
Organization: OpenConnect Systems, Dallas, TX
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 15:41:07 GMT


I watched this case last night on A&E. However, I'm a little
puzzled over the ending. As Holmes and Watson were about to
enter a building (221 Baker Street or other), the camera
pans across the street to show Moriarty (sp?) looking
over his should at them both.

Does this signify Moriarty's increasing interest in Holmes
or simply his displeasure with Holmes' thwarting his plans
on a third occasion?

I sincerely hope the series continues. I would love to see
J/B portray Holmes in the remaining mysteries, as someone
previously mentioned in this newsgroup.

-MAV
-- 



Newsgroups: alt.fan.holmes