From: steven@jaynes ( Steve Novak)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: That Responsibility Thing, Take 2
Date: 8 Oct 92 18:53:36 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies

> = (Bruce "Blarney" Varney) writes:
>> = (Ray Fischer) writes:
>>> = (Bruce Varney) writes ...

>>>	I did not play with any words. Murder is "the killing of one
>>>human being by another". No playing needed. Mother is a human being, 

>>This is a blatant and obvious lie.

>	I guess when you have no way to prove your point, you must
>resort to calling me a liar eh? 

Especially when you ARE a lying sack, then of course.

>Come over some time and I will show you my dictionary.

Perhaps you could give us the name of your dictionary and its
definition?  Or is that too easy?  

Are all those Desert Storm warriors "murderers"?  Is the person who kills
someone to protect themselves from that person a "murderer"?  Is a
doctor who makes a mistake causing his patient to die a "murderer"?  Is
a motorist who slides on ice into another car and killing its driver, a
"murderer"?

SEE how goddamned STUPID you look?

If you're going to defend some brainless lie you've embarrassed
yourself with, then please do it here again; we can always use the
laughs on t.a.

>>As has been pointed out enough times for even the stupidest person,
>>murder is the _unlawful_ killing of one person by another.  Putting it
>>in quotes does not make it less of a lie or more correct.

>	My dictionary says exactly what I have in quotes. 

What dictionary?  What's the exact definition?

>That is the purpose of the quotes.

Only if you mention what the fuck you're quoting _from_.

>If you have something to say, other than making baseless claims that I
>am a liar then say it.

He already _did_ - he stated a truism that you're a liar.  *I'll* add, a
cheap and tawdry one at that.  You sound like an 11th grader.

>>>	Neither am I trivializing the notion of murder. Murder is
>>>a horid and despicable act. It should not be allowed - this is
>>>why I get so upset that the slaughter of innocent, defenseless children
>>>has been legalized here.

>>Please spare us the self-serving sanctimonious bullshit.  I don't
>>believe for an instant that care even the slightest bit for people or
>>children, innocent, defenseless, or otherwise.  Your obvious use of a
>>trite emotional ploy is disgusting in its trivialization of the issues
>>and revealing for the lack of any substance you provide to back it up.

I agree 100%.

>	I have backed my position up countless number of times. 

Have you posted the name of your dictionary...YET?

>If you wish to point out some real flaws in my reasoning that you see, 
>then do so. But if all you can do nit-pick at semantics, then shut up.

We're nitpicking at outlandish lies.  And it seems to be frustrating the
hell out of you, Brucie.  Maybe you oughta quit lying, then people will
leave you alone.


-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Steve Novak |    |"Wacker the K"| 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
steven@advtech.USWest.Com
Xref: sparky talk.abortion:41215 talk.politics.misc:50142 alt.sex:32251 alt.rush-limbaugh:6808 alt.politics.elections:15532 alt.politics.clinton:8962 alt.politics.bush:8083