Newsgroups: alt.abortion.inequity

karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM writes:

===============================================================================
Seems to me that we have, as a people in America, reached a crossroads:

	On the one hand there are people who wish to remove a woman's right
	to choose whether or not to terminate a pregnancy.  They are gaining
	ground.

	On the other hand there are people who believe that a man is a
	walking wallet when there are children concerned and the couple
	which produced those kids aren't married at the current moment.

	I posit that both of these situations are undesirable for the people
	concerned.

	I further posit that it is >impossible<, or nearly so, for either
	group of people to make a significant difference on their own.

However, we don't have to act alone.

I propose we act together.  I propose that both women AND men do something
historic -- act together as a group to secure reproductive and parental
rights for both genders.

What I envision is a law which provides all of the following:

1)	Provides a declaration of a woman's right to choose up to the 12th
	week of pregnancy whether or not to have an abortion -- as a federal
	law.  Not on privacy grounds -- but on ownership of one's body.

1.5)	Provides a declaration that in the event that a woman does not want
	to keep a child, but also does not wish to abort for any reason, may
	place said child up for adoption at birth.  The male parent shall 
	have the right of first refusal to adopt a child produced in this 
	circumstance.

2)	Provides a declaration that >men< have the right, up to the 12th
	week of pregnancy of a women that they are the father, to state 
	whether or not they want the rights and responsibilities of the
	foetus in-utereo.  Include a provision that should the pregnancy be
	concealed from the man, that he has 30 days from the date of
	discovery to declare his intentions.

	Rights (1) and (2) are to apply >regardless< of the marital status
	of the parties.  (Should married parties disagree on these points 
	there may not be a marriage shortly thereafter)

3)	Provides a declaration that in custody cases, and in the event of
	a split of a present-case family unit, that both parties will be
	presumed to be equally capable of parenting, and that the split
	shall be 50-50 with regards to custody.  Further, the default 
	support award shall be >zero< (since both parents have the 
	responsibility half the time, they both inherently bear half the
	costs).  In particular, repeal the "tender years" doctrine at
	the federal level and require proof by preponderance of the
	evidence that a parent is >unsuitable< -- not "less suitable" --
	before the default custody split of 50-50 is modified.

	Further, should one parent choose to move away from the original area
	where the divorce took place, the parent which decides to move shall 
	bear the cost(s) of transporting the child(ren) involved to comply
	with the custody decision.  In no case shall this movement be
	grounds for modification of custody.

4)	Provide a declaration that any allegation of abuse made by one
	parent or another which is proven false and baseless shall be:
	1)	A class X felony (similar to dealing narcotics)
	2)	Immediately cause the accusing person to be ineligible to
		receive further custody of children in said dispute.

5)	Provide that interference with custody arrangements of any kind 
	by a parent is grounds for immediate loss of custody of the child(ren)
	affected, and is additionally a federal felony.  This is intended to 
	prevent situations where parents "impound" their children against a 
	court order or in the hopes of "swinging" a custody dispute.


This package of legislation would provide the following:

1)	It would >guarantee< the right of a woman to choose whether or not
	to carry a pregnancy to term - - that is, codify at a federal level
	the freedom of reproduction that women want.

2)	It would >guarantee< the right of a man to choose whether or not to
	become a father, while insuring that the woman (who is the ultimate
	authority on the final disposition of the fetus) has enough
	information to know whether or not she can expect a full 1/2
	contribution in the raising and parenting of that child BEFORE it
	becomes her (or their) ward.

3)	It would provide that should a child be wanted by EITHER of its
	parents that it would have a home with said parent(s) in preference
	to adoptive placement with any other person.

4)	It would provide that any parent who makes a false accusation of
	child abuse will be punished for the extreme psychological damage 
	done to that child and its relationship with the innocent parent(s).

5)	It would provide children with the right to be parented by >both<
	parents, and properly punish unlawful interferance with child
	custody.

6)	It would remove the presumption that women are the "better" parent;
	that women are automatically entitled to preferrential treatment in
	terms of support awards and custody, and that men should be treated
	as "walking wallets".


I expect to get flamed to hell for this suggestion.  Nonetheless, I believe
that a >balanced< approach such as this, which can be supported by both men
and women, is the only way both men and women will manage to guarantee their
reproductive freedom >and< their rights and responsibilities with regards to
minor children.

Further, I will go so far as to suggest that there is a simpler solution to
the problem of "fair" reproductive freedom that is now present in law:
	Remove a woman's right to choose whether or not to become a parent
	after a pregnancy occurs.

I think it is obvious to both men and women that this is a less desirable
alternative than the proposal above.  Nonetheless, I believe it is a
defensible position for men should women decide not to permit equality,
within the limits of biology, in this process.

Anyone want to join in on this one and see if we can get some legislative
action on this proposal at a federal level?

--
I have set up a mail alias "repro-support@ddsw1.mcs.com" for those who 
feel as I do on this issue.  Send mail there containing your full mailing 
address (surface mail) and a statement of your support and I will, immediately
following Bill Clinton's inauguration, send surface mail containing the full 
list of replies AND the proposal to the White House.  

Feel free to add your comments in your mail.  The system will log ALL of it.
You will receive confirmation of mail delivery to ddsw1.mcs.com.

Tell your friends about this one.  If they feel as I do on this, urge them
to support us.  SEND IN YOUR EMAIL OF SUPPORT.  Write your Congresspersons 
and Senators yourselves.  Get involved.

DO SOMETHING!

Together, we CAN change the status quo.  But we must have a voice.  The
network is an excellent voice.

If you need a copy of the original proposal as I posted it to the net a
couple of days ago, send mail to "repro-request@ddsw1.mcs.com".  The system 
will email it back to you.  The body of your mail will be ignored when sent
to this address.

--
Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
Data Line: [+1 312 248-0900] Anon. arch. (nuucp) 00:00-06:00 C[SD]T
Request file: /u/public/sources/DIRECTORY/README for instructions

===========================================================================
followups to alt.activism.
Xref: sparky alt.abortion.inequity:5208 talk.abortion:48863 soc.women:20046