HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lein@cat.uucp (John Leinaweaver)
Subject: Re: Penn State Should Withdraw
Organization: Bellcore, Piscataway NJ
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 23:15:26 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.190312.56019@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> mlsa@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MICHAEL LAUREN SHERMAN) writes:
>In article <BILLMS.92Nov17142033@gip.eecs.umich.edu>, billms@eecs.umich.edu (Wil
>liam Mangione-Smith) writes:
>>       billms@eecs.umich.edu
>>
>This past weekend Maryland made perennial ACC power clemson look like a sand
>lot team, sure Maryland has a poor record vrs PSU, but the Shitney lions are a
>bunch of fairy ass cheaters, just give us a few (45) more games, we'll even
>the score.  Also allow me to praise Mark Duffner who may just be the best
>coach in football period.  Watch them run roughshod over the ACC in the years
>to come and bring home the national championship to College Park for the
>second time.  We did it in the fifties, we'll do it again.  Also, how many PSU
>qb's are currently in the NFL?  Compare to the number of terps!

How many Maryland LB's are in the NFL?  Compare to the number of Lions!


John L
From: peavy@rintintin.Colorado.EDU (PEAVY ROBERT MARSHAL)
Subject: RE: Solving A&M's Schedule Strength Problem
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:25:43 GMT

Brad Knight
knightb@abulafia.b21.ingr.com    writes:


Here's my proposal.  The SEC should invite TAMU to join along with Southern
Mississippi.  Both would join the west division while Auburn would move to
the east division.  

(rest deleted)


Sure sounds great.  Then all you have to do is send CU and Texas to the 
Not-so-PAC-"12" (Which is the best conference in the nation), OU to the 
Big-10/11/12, and combine the Big-8 and SWC to form a running attack like 
WAC.  Not to bad a solution, huh?  
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.college:20862 rec.sport.football.misc:531
From: jdng90@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Gorsuch JDN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college,rec.sport.football.misc
Subject: Re: British College League
Date: 19 Nov 92 10:36:59 GMT


British Student American Football League (BSAFL) 
 
Week 5 : 15/11/92

 Southampton   70   0  Bath
 Sheffield     12   6  Newcastle 
 Strathclyde   24   8  Paisley
 Stafford       0  26  Leicester
 Stirling       0  34  Glasgow
 Cardiff       53   0  Bristol
 Reading        0   8  Oxford
 East Anglia    0  34  Cambridge

 League Tables 
Northern 
                              K   W-L-T   Pf  Pa  Pts  lst 
   Strathclyde   Hawks        4   3-1-0   68  35  10   ( 2) 
   Stirling                   5   2-2-1   47  74   9   ( 1) 
   Sheffield     Zulus        3   2-1-0   52  56   7   ( 5) 
   Teeside       Demons       3   2-1-0   14  32   7   ( 3) 
   Paisley       Panthers     3   1-1-1   41  56   6   ( 4) 
   Glasgow       Tigers       1   1-0-0   34   0   3   (11) 
   Leeds                      2   1-1-0   44  27   3   ( 6) 
   Hull          Sharks       2   0-2-0   12  27   2   ( 7) 
   Newcastle     Destroyers   3   0-3-0    6  14   1   ( 8) 
   Lancaster                  1   0-1-0    0   1   0   ( 9) 
   Sunderland                 1   0-1-0    0   1   0   (10) 

Southern 
   Southampton   Stags        3   3-0-0  178   0   9   ( 1) 
   Cambridge     Blues        3   3-0-0   84  14   9   ( 3) 
   Leicester     Lemmings     3   2-1-0   50  30   7   ( 4) 
   Loughborough  Aces         2   2-0-0   71   5   6   ( 2) 
   East Anglia   Pirates      2   1-1-0   50  34   4   ( 5) 
   Cardiff       Cobras       2   1-1-0   53  56   4   (12) 
   Birmingham                 1   1-0-0   50   0   3   ( 6) 
   Oxford        Cavaliers    1   1-0-0    8   0   3   (15) 
   Reading       Whiteknights 3   0-3-0    0  88   3   ( 7) 
   Bristol       Bullets      3   0-3-0    0 157   3   ( 8) 
   Staffordshire Stallions    2   0-2-0    0  67   2   (11) 
   Aston         Rhinos       1   0-1-0   14  20   1   ( 9) 
   Warwick       Wolves       1   0-1-0    0  19   1   (10) 
   Bath          Killer Bees  1   0-1-0    0  70   1   (13) 
   Aberystwyth   Thunder      0                    0   (14)  
          
  Legend  
     k : known results 
    pts: 3 for a win , 2 for a tie, 1 for a loss, 0 for a forfeit 
    lst: last weeks position 

 Please Note: These tables are not official, but have been made by
myself from results printed in 'First Down'. If there are any errors
or omissions please send the correct information to me and I will be
happy to include it in my next post. 

             jon
              ( jdng90@uk.ac.soton.ecs) 

 This week : Oxford at Southampton
 

 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: pdunn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick L Dunn)
Subject: Oops! (was Re: I-AA Playoff Picture
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:43:38 GMT

Gee--forgot to put the Panthers in there.  I knew if I did this, I would screw 
up.  Scratch Umass--Put UNI in their place.

Sorry, UNI fans--I hope my first errant choices are not blessed with the gift 
of prophecy.  I would really catch hell then--especially since I caused UNI to 
lose to E. Illinois.:-)

PDunn
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: th9708@meibm8.cen.uiuc.edu (Todd Lee Henderson)
Subject: Re: AP make FSU #3
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:31:56 GMT

andrew@huey.met.fsu.edu (Andrew Devanas) writes:

>Oh give me a break Todd. First of all, FSU has an off week this week. I've
>seen many times through the years teams fall back down a notch during an 

How many times have you seen a team with a loss leapfrog over a unbeaten
near the top of the polls?

>off week. Second, can you fault FSU fans for wanting to face miami again?
>What if the aggies lost to Texas early in the year, then won the rest of 
>their games and had a chance to meet Texas in a bowl game. Remember, the

We might want to play them, but if someone else had a better record and it
was between tu and someone else for the MNC, I don't think we would deserve
it.  I somehow get the feeling that the fsu fans somehow feel they
'deserve' a second chance.

>FSU team now is much improved over the one that lost to miami. (unfortunately,
>miami has probably improved also) Third, alot of FSU fans would be happy to
>play in another cotton bowl, it's just that the thought of facing miami again

With things the way they are now it would be a good game.  We may not win,
but I think it would be a toss up and fsu would have their hands full.

>is appealing. Finally, whether the aggies play FSU in the cotton or play for
>the MNC on NYD, they will get the chance to prove themselves against a quality

I don't think us playing for a MNC on 1-1-93 is very likely at this point.
It will take a lot of "if's" to come out just right.  I think we will be 
better off next year if we can prove ourselves in the Bowl game.

>team. So hold your breath and let others spout, if TAMU is for real, you will
>get the last laugh!
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  I hope! :):)

Good point.  I kind of got wrapped up in this whole poll thing.

Todd
>		-Andy
From: ward@max.cchem.berkeley.edu (Ward Thompson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: OU over OSU?
Date: 18 Nov 1992 06:03:57 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: max.cchem.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Nov17.235331.13291@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> crobbins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Chris S. Robbins) writes:
> mminihan@inetg1.ARCO.COM (Mike Minihan) writes:
>>      A SWC lesson from a BIG 8 member:
>>      tu- texas university
>>      UT- University of Tennessee
>
>    It's pretty sad when a sooner has to take an old, worn out, aggie
>    cliche and try to use it to insult a fan of The University of Texas.
>    Whenever you guys have a season where you can snap the four year streak
>    and not tie OSU, then you can talk.  Oh well, at least basketball season
>    is about to begin, ou has a fairly decent team, right???


    This is like Indianapolis and New England arguing over who has the 
better football team - it just doesn't matter, they both suck.  Texas and
Oklahoma both stink - the glory days are no longer.  Maybe next year they
will be back to the old days when they were great, but this year why not
just swallow your Sooner and Longhorn pride and let it lie.  Maybe you
could consider therapy for fans of has-been football teams.


					Ward
From: demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: OSU beats Michigan: 13-13
Date: 23 Nov 92 00:52:15 EST
Organization: Demonic Possesions, Inc.

In article <mbH=#gB@engin.umich.edu>, hpang@engin.umich.edu (Ho Sun Pang) writes:
> In article <1992Nov22.022704.5756@desire.wright.edu> demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man) writes:
> 
> First of all, my Stupendous Man, have you look at the score clearly enough?
> It was 13-13.  How come you said "OSU beats Michigan" in the subject header?

	An inside joke for Columbus OSU fans.  Two years ago the headline from
the Indiana game read:

	OSU loses to Indiana, 28-28.

> Should we fair-minded netters void everything you've said?

	What you void is up to you and your bowels.

>>	Once again OSU dominates a team but doesn't come away with a win.  At
>>least it's not a loss :\.
>>
> Ohio State's performance was very good.  The option plays seemed unstoppable
> most of the time.  Yep, OSU did dominates.
> 
> Another reason for such domination may be because Michigan was not motivated 
> at all.  Hell, did Moeller said "I do not expect them (the Wolverines) to 
> win" before the game?  What a way to inspire the players.
> 
> Yeah, in the final minutes Moeller was (again) attempted to run out the
> clock.  What a jerk!  I'd guess he's saying this to himself:  "The burden of 
> chasing MNC was long gone, what the hack!.  My team is still unbeaten."

	I think that was it also.  Mo doesn't seem to know pride.

>>	Michigan passing.  Michigan has a passing game? :)  2 INTs, pathetic
>>yardage.  Elvis has left the stadium....
>>
> 
> Nothing could get worst than that...
> 
>>
>>	OSU should be very competative in the Citrus Bowl.  Whoever we play is
>>in for a real game.
>>
>>	Rose Bowl: couldn't get worse!  WU loses and Michigan is 1-0-2 in their
>>final three games (almost 0-3).  Stink-o-rama.  I predict lowest RB ratings in
>>years.
>>
>>
> 
> Yeah, let's kick ass in the Citrus Bowl (to stop all those stupid woofings
> about Big Ten teams).
> 
> On Rose Bowl:  A pathetic 3-ties team vs. a team who lost big-time at WSU,
> may be I should watch the Alabama and Canes instead...

	That's what I'll be watching.

Brett
===============================================================================
80s: 18 million new jobs, deficits down (%GNP), tax rates down, tax revenues up
GNP up, inflation down, unemployment down, interest rates down, cold war won
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: sl45z@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Projected bowl matchups/WAC
Date: 19 Nov 92 09:08:14 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <Nov.18.14.45.01.1992.7251@charon.rutgers.edu>, subhas@charon.rutgers.edu (Subhasish Roy Choudhury) writes:
> >    BOWL                 TEAM       vs.       TEAM
> 
> 
> 2. Aloha             Hawaii        vs.     Kansas
>                   (WAC No. 2)            (B8 No. 3)
> 
> 3. Copper            BYU           vs.     Iowa
>                   (WAC No. 3)            (At large)
> 
> 4. Freedom           USC           vs.     Indiana
>                   (P10 No. 3)            (At large)
> 
> 5. Holiday        San Diego State  vs.   Michigan State/Illinois
>                    (WAC #1)                  (At large)             
> 
> * - Confirmed and accepted their bids
> The explanations and bowl tie-ups are given in the brackets wherever
> possible.
> 
> Any comments welcome.
	Don't mind if I do. 
> Subhasish Roy

	I was quite interested in the bowl games concerning WAC teams.  First
place in the WAC in not sewn up by any means. (tie breakers incl.)  There are
some big games this weekend that will decide it all.  Fresno plays San Diego
St. in Fresno, if I'm not mistaken.  If anyone thinks this is an Aztec
cakewalk, they're way up in the night.  SDSU might be favorites to win, but I
wouldn't go beyond that.  Also, if SDSU loses, they would have to beat Miami
the following week just to get their 6 wins.
	BYU plays Utah at Utah.  This should be a good matchup, on the turf,
but homefield advantage isn't all that big.  Rice Stadium is an hours drive
from BYU.  BYU has been playing better than any other team in the WAC over the
past 4 weeks.  If they keep it up tis week, they will sit at 8-4 on the season
with a share of #1 in the WAC.  This should propell them into a better bowl
than the Copper.  I thought the Freedom Bowl might come calling.  Yes? No?  If
so, then BYU would face a better opponent than whoever is in the Holiday Bowl. 
Interesting!
	I'm not sure where Hawaii fits in if they lose, but I doubt they will. 
Both SDSU and HU would have to lose and BYU win to get the Holiday Bowl, but I
don't think I want to see that if they can make the Freedom Bowl.  Then maybe a
good Fresno team, after beating SDSU could do the Copper.  We'll have to wait
for Sat. I guess.
-- 
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
     |	Travis L. Clements |   		I'M TAKING THE WIFE!!
     |  N. Logan, Utah     |                                                   
|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+||+
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Miami scheduling again
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:43:21 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.181537.1824@m.cs.uiuc.edu> bharat@cs.uiuc.edu writes:

>Miami can and SHOULD avoid this rematch -- as you said, very little to
>gain, and a LOT to lose... sorry, FSU you had a shot.
>
>PS: I am NOT a Miami fine, and last year blasted them for ducking
>Florida (no question they did!), but this year I think they are
>entitled to avoid FSU (if the coalition rules allow it) as they
>already trounced them.
         ^^^^^^^^
TROUNCED? I believe the phrase you were groping for here is "squeaked by
on a missed field goal"

r

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: zcjm0f@wwnv45.uucp (CJohn Mace)
Subject: Re: hey cliff...
Keywords: n
Organization: Amoco Production
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:55:50 GMT


In article <Ef20hC600VqTAFqVQz@andrew.cmu.edu> Mike Molloy <mmaq+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>
>> Hey Cliff, what's the name of that damn Miami bird mascot?
>
>
>> - goober (racking my brain trying to figure it out) smith
>
>
>The bird's name is Sebastian the Ibis.  According to legend,
>the ibis is the last bird to leave it's nest when a hurricane hits.

It only makes sense at "prison U"...  You got to have a mascot that
hangs around to loots!

cmuck

ps- don't get all bent out of shape, its only a joke...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Big 8 Bowl paranoia
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 09:58:08 CST
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


In article <wilbanks.722463383@spot.Colorado.EDU>, wilbanks@spot.Colorado.EDU (Wendell Gee) writes:
>This is getting really weird.
>Kansas loses to Mizzou. Suddenly, they're 4th in the conference at 4-3. Now,
>if Oklahoma beats Nebraska on Friday, Oklahoma finishes second and can talk
>bowl. Nebraska falls to third and goes to the Aloha Bowl.
>At least I think. Would a 4-1-2 beat a 4-2 record?
>
Neb would have to really, really choke to K-State in Tokyo...so
give them a 5-2 record, which would beat OU's 4-1-2.

As for the Big8...Colo is either Orange or some BowlAll.
Neb is Orange to ??? depending on their next 2 games.
KU is Aloha to nothing depending on Neb's games.
OU is possible bowl to nothing.

Neb's loss to ISU skewd things a bit, but then KU's losses 
really messed things up for themselves.  
--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Re: It's "PIG"skin time
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:42:53 GMT

In article <1ebcr4INN4nu@early-bird.think.com> krall@Think.COM (Tom Krall) writes:
>
>Its that time of year again for Minnesota to take back
>the farm boy's favorite barn-yard animal- Floyd!
>
>Here piggy piggy piggy.....
>
>(Please insert big smiley!!!)
>
>All I hope for is 'Sota to make it a good game.
>
>Go Gophs... Grab the Pig !

	I always find this an intriguing matchup (I might be the only
	one).  Minnesota has pulled some big recent upsets in the series,
	including two years ago at the Dome, with half the crowd from
	Iowa (I expect the same on Saturday).  It turns out that Iowa
	backed into the Rose Bowl that afternoon because Michigan kicked
	a field goal at Ohio State at the end of that game to break a
	tie.  Because of the tiebreakers, and Iowa's loss to Minnesota
	that night, Illinois would have gotten the Rose Bowl bid had
	Michigan missed the FG...  This time, Iowa needs to win to perhaps
	get the Holiday bid, but they will already know by gametime if
	Michigan State has won or lost...
-- 
-------------------------------
| Randy Peppler               |
| Illinois State Water Survey |
| peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu    |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: murphy@rock.enet.dec.com ()
Subject: Oklahoma clinches Orange Bowl
Reply-To: murphy@rock.enet.dec.com ()
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 21:03:11 GMT


Ok, now that I have your attention.  I tried this before but never got the
answer I wanted.  On Saturday, OU and OSU tied.  IF(repeat for the brain dead
IF IF IF IF) OU had beaten OSU(repeat OSU OSU, not CU), and
went on to beat Nebraska, they would be 5-1-1 as would be CU.  Who would go
to the Orange Bowl.  The dilemma is, that if OU would go rather than CU (I
don't know, you tell me), then Gibbs costs his team a shot at the Orange
Bowl by accepting the tie (if I recall, they kicked a short FG to tie at the
end, I could be hosed in the head).  But he may be assuming that NU has
beaten ISU, or does he know of the upset first, which might change his 
decision.  Go for the win, beat highly ranked NU to finish 8-2-1. With the
final win over NU and a several year hiatus from Miami, get the OB bid. Or
MUST the OB take 9-1-1 CU, despite the in conference tie.  If so, avoid the
loss to get a minor bowl bid.

Any comments on this scenario?

Murph
From: mln@sunkj.larc.nasa.gov (Michael L Nelson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: FSU 1993 Schedule
Date: 18 Nov 1992 18:01:12 GMT
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA  USA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: sunkj.larc.nasa.gov

>An imposing Knight in Shining Armor with scarlet plumage streaming
>from his helmet and riding on a grey and white-speckled steed
>charges onto the playing field with his lance poised.  As he reaches
>midfield he impales the oppositions' mascot (such as a panther,
>an Ibis, a Hokie, an eagle, mountaineer, owl or an orange) while the
>crowd screams over and over "Yes your majesty, yes your majesty."

Bob,

I can kinda picture most of these, but I have to think that
a Knight lancing an orange would look pretty damn silly.

Michael Nelson
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: thedm@leland.Stanford.EDU (Marcus M. Trevino)
Subject: Re: UCLA bowl hopes !!
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 09:27:51 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.210541.19730@mic.ucla.edu> bryan@eggneb.astro.ucla.edu (Bryan LittleField ) writes:
> Does UCLA have any hopes of reaching a bowl game this year ???

As I can recall, they should be headed to the Rose Bowl because
they don't have to face Washington and they won their first three
games.....But wait a second.....That was contingent on them winning
all of their games.  In view of this fact, and somewhat based on
UCLAs excellent showings this year in the Pac-10, I think the answer is
NO!!!!



>
> If they can beat USC this saturday they will be 6-5 ...
> They should be going somewhere !!!!

They are!! They are going to watch the Freedom Bowl. ;)

> --Bryan

TheDM @ Stanford University

Marcus Trevino

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mdq@unislc.uucp (Michael Quinn)
Subject: Re: Copper Bowl (was Re: thanks minnesota!)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Distribution: rec
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 16:45:28 GMT

The copper bowl has decided to have Utah vs. Washington State
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: chuckd@cpqhou.compaq.com (Chuck Dickson)
Subject: Re: Canes in the Graves-yard!
Organization: Compaq Computer Corporation
Distribution: rec
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 14:07:24 GMT

in article <1992Nov17.043522.15976@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>, saqx@vax5.cit.cornell.edu says:
> 
> Miami visits the Carrier Dome this Saturday for a game that will decide
> which team plays for the national championship on January 1.  So come on, 
> all you fans that "dislike" the Hurricanes with a passion---pull for the
> Orange this weekend!  Pray for us; we'll need it!  But no woofing, please;
> restrict statements of optimism to nothing stronger than "I think they 
> can give Miami a game".  Thanks for your support.  
> 
>                         COME ON, ORANGEMEN!

This game has the potential to show how ludicrous the Big East's champion
is determined this year.

If Syracuse beats Miami by a small margin, they would be unbeaten in the
Big East and Miami would have one loss in the Conference.

Yet, Miami might only drop a spot or two in the polls and Syracuse could
gain a few spots, but potentially STILL BE RANKED BEHIND MIAMI AT THE END
OF THE SEASON.  Therefore, since the Big East champion is determined by the
highest ranking in the national polls, a one conference loss Hurricane team
would claim the Big East championship over an undefeated (in the conference)
Syracuse team.

Only in the Big Easy....


-- 
**************************************************************************
Chuck Dickson - Compaq Computer Corporation - chuckd@cpqhou.uucp
SHHHH...I'm hunting wabbit...eheheheheheheh
The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of my employer.
From: ddo@wmod2000.larc.nasa.gov (Dale Ohmann)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: ACC Non-Conf Foes (was: Re: FSU 1993 Schedule)
Date: 17 Nov 1992 20:06:50 GMT
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA  USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: wmod2000.larc.nasa.gov
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

1993 FSU Non-Conference Opponents:

> 
> FSU: Miami(*), Tulane, Florida(*).
> 

I believe that Tulane has been replaced with Notre Dame (in South Bend) for
1993.  Talk about a difficult non-conference schedule!  Notre Dame will
play the Seminoles in Florida in 1994, although not in Doak Campbell 
Stadium at FSU.  I think they will play at the Citrus Bowl in Orlando.

At least noone can claim the 'Noles are taking the patsy path to the MNC.

--
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Daring Dale Douglas           ddo@wmod2000.larc.nasa.gov            IMHO  |
|                                                                            |
|  Opinions are like unique anatomical features, we all have them.           |
|  Mine are uniquely mine and don't reflect the anatomy of others.           |
|                                                                            |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+