HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Re: Mail Bouncing
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 16:33:09 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.234238.1@vaxb.acs.unt.edu> ij59@vaxb.acs.unt.edu writes:
> I got an A on my report on Rush called "The King of Radio Innovation" in 
>English class! I was thinking of mailing Rush a copy but I'm not sure after 
>all this I've been reading here about mail being returned. I'm wondering if 
>he would even get around to reading it, much less send a response.

Rush has repeatedly said he reads every letter he gets in his CompuServe
mailbox, but I have had problems sending him mail, mainly because his 
mailbox gets full really quickly, especially during the weekends. Early
mornings (c 2 to 8 a.m. EST) seems to be the best time for me. Other 
than that, my best advice is "if at first you can't succeed, try, try 
again."
-- 
John Switzer               | "What we have here is a failure to 
                           | masticate."
Compuserve: 74076,1250     | -- MST3K's Dr. Clayton "Firebrand" Forrester, 
Internet: jrs@netcom.com   | after TV's Frank is unable to eat his 13th turkey.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: asparrow@mcs213a.cs.umr.edu (Angelia Sparrow)
Subject: Re: Sex Education in Public Schools
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 18:37:03 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla

In article <1993Jan8.205256.13847@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>(comments about obscene books used for sex-ed deleted)
>Reading this made me wish that 'Farenheit 451' was real.
>'Burn the books, chop up the ashes, then burn the ashes'
>                                       quote from '451'
>Simon

Why?
Are you afraid of facts?  That masturbation does
feel good?  That 4% of people are strictly homosexual
and 4% are strictly het and the other 92% fall somewher
in between?

When they burn books, they will, in the end,
burn people as well.

I'd rather my kids be given the information from even
a biased text than to find it out by experimentation
or strteet myth.  A biased text they can filter through
trheir own biases, but blatent misinformation is far more
dangerous.

Besides, let 'em learn about sex like I did:
from Krafft-Ebbing's _Psychpathia Sexualis_.  After
all, once good Christian parents have given you the
same definition for sex and rape, what's to lose?

Angel, pro-information, pro morality, pro responsibility


Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: linda@tellabs.com (Linda Jensen)
Subject: Clinton Cabinet
Followup-To: alt.rush-limbaugh
Organization: Tellabs, Inc.
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 18:26:14 GMT




>  
>  Unofficial Summary of the Rush Limbaugh Show
>  
>  for Tuesday, January 5, 1993
>  
>  by John Switzer
>  
>  
>  
>  Rush knows he will take a lot of heat for saying this, but he
>  recalls his Undeniable Truth of Life #24, which states "feminism
>  was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the
>  mainstream of society." Rush challenges his audience to "find any
>  one babe among the female Clinton nominees. To the contrary,
>  folks, you find the opposite."
>  
>  Rush will undoubtedly be called shallow, baseless, and cold-
>  hearted for saying this, yet it's undeniable that he is right. He
>  promises to compare on his TV show conservative babes such as
>  Elizabeth Dole and Carla Hills to the type of women Clinton has
>  put into his administration. This could be the first "Cabinet
>  Beauty Contest."
>  

	By Golly, I think Rush is on to something here!  I guess
	conservatives marry ugly (witness Bush,Quayle) but hire
	'babes'.

	Whereas, liberals marry attractive women (witness Clinton,
	Gore) and hire the unattractive.

	Interesting, no?

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
From: john@anasazi.com (John R. Moore)
Subject: Re: Conservative?  Hahaha....
Reply-To: john@anasazi.com
Organization: Anasazi, Inc.  Phoenix, Arizona USA
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 05:45:14 GMT

Keywords: 

In article <1993Jan4.093238.25382@hemlock.cray.com> rja@mahogany126.cray.com (Russ Anderson) writes:
]> The Colorado Law reduced the number of laws (by prohibiting certain forms
]> of special group protection laws). As such, it fits with the criteria
]> you give for conservatives. Hypocritical? Not at all!
]
]Would a Constitutional amendment prohibiting any laws to protect private 
]property also fit the criteria of "Conservative"?  After all, it would 
]reduce the number of laws (like laws agains theft, etc).
No.
]
]How do the two amendments differ?
Russ, I thought better of you. It is completely obvious how they differ.


-- 
John Moore NJ7E, 7525 Clearwater Pkwy, Scottsdale, AZ 85253  (602-951-9326)
john@anasazi.com ncar!noao!asuvax!anasaz!john anasaz!john@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
 - - If a field of study has the word "science" in it - it isn't a science - -
 - - Support ALL of the bill of rights, INCLUDING the 2nd amendment! - -
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: WHY DOES RUSH MISPRONOUNCE NAMES?
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 01:46:47 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX

schlegel@cwis.unomaha.edu (Mark Schlegel) writes:

> ndasmith@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Noah Smith) writes:
> 
> >Regular listeners will notice that Rush likes to say the last names of
> >Robert Reich and Mario Cuomo differently than most people are accustomed
> >to.  If anybody knows why he's doing this, let me know at the above
> >address.  Thanks!
> 
> Because Cuomo complained that Dan Quayle had called him "Mario" to accentuate
> his Italian background.  (this occured after Mario called Dan some very
> childish things like "Danny Boy", apparently Mario thinks it's ok for him
> to say things like that about Dan Quayle but Dan can't call him by his first
> name).  Rush now calls Cuomo "Coo moh" so that he can't be labeled a racist
> for bringing attention to Cuomo's italian background because that isn't the
> way Cuomo pronounces it.  He just does it to make a point that Mario Cuomo
> seems to be ashamed of his background and that Cuomo's position is 
> ridiculous.
> 
> 
> 


Nah.  It didn't bother Mario a bit that Danny mispronounced his name for 
effect.  Mario just pointed it out so that it would make the papaers. 
Since a lot of Italians up there ARE indeed prickly about such insults, 
Mario just wanted to make sure Dan 'n Bush would lose some 
Italian-American votes.  To bad Dan never figured out ethnic nonsense 
like that is a way to lose votes.

Pope Charles    SubGenius Pope Of Houston    Slack!

--
popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX, (713) 481-3763
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: kellyj@leland.Stanford.EDU (Kelly Johnson)
Subject: Choice?
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 93 21:49:45 GMT

And speaking of choice.... why don't I have the choice of using my
tax-dollars to send my child to a private school that teaches values
I agree with.  Clinton wants to have a voucher system, but will not
allow them to be used for private education.  Could it be that the
liberals still want government control over what students learn
(or at least penalize those that choose to eliminate that government
control from their child's education)?  Besides, if it's good
education we want for our students I think most of us believe that
most private education tends to be better (and cheaper per student) than
public.  
.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: rja@mahogany126.cray.com (Russ Anderson)
Subject: Re: Good liberalism
Originator: rja@mahogany126
Keywords: Unofficial Summary Rush Limbaugh
Organization: The 1991 World Champion Minnesota Twins!
Distribution: usa
Date: 8 Jan 93 16:10:46 CST


In article <1993Jan8.203819.13517@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>, sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
> 
> 'Good liberalism' is an oxymoron.

Justice Rehnquist
Reagan Memoirs
Conservative thinktank
Civil war

> Liberalism is ungood!

Ignorance is strength!

-- 
Russ Anderson    |  Disclaimer: Any statements are my own and do not reflect
------------------              upon my employer or anyone else.  (c) 1992
EX-Twins' Jack Morris, 10 innings pitched, 0 runs (World Series MVP!)
From: wiggins@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (Don Wiggins)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Mistaken logic in Rush's book?
Date: 10 Jan 93 17:20:43 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell) writes:

  >object to such practices are full of shit because the little animals 
  >cannot assert their rights themselves?  Thta they are sentient creatures 
  >that obviously do suffer and feel pain has no bearings on any of this?
  >Or is Rush one of these peculiar people that consider animals to be only 
  >some sort of automatas with no real sense of pain or suffering in such 
  >circumstances?
  >I have not read his book as this would mean paying good money for it.
  >So I do not know exactly what his views in his book really are.
  >Do you think that animals being able to suffer and feel pain imply some 
  >sort of duty to them in our dealings with animals as we exploit them?

You leave no doubt that you haven't read his book.  Nowhere does he
approve of the torturing of animals.  In fact, he makes it clear that he
loves dogs, has never killed any animal, and would never do so.  He does
not, however, have any patience with those who object to the breeding of
furry little critters to be made into clothing, unless they also object to
eating a Big Mac or stopping by a Colonel Sanders for lunch.  It's exactly
the same thing.

He does point out that the term "rights" has a very powerful
connotation in our language, and when you use it to describe animals,
you attempt to give them something that they don't already have.  If
animals had "rights"  as we think of them, then we would have to
establish an Operation Rescue for every mouse that was threatened by a
spotted owl.  To endow them with the same "rights" as humans is just
plain silly.

|===========================================================================|
|Don Wiggins, German-Irish-American    | Success is getting what you want.  |
| & Advance Scout for the Baby Boomers | Happiness is wanting what you get. |
|Internet: wiggins@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu |     -- Brother Dave Gardner        |
|===========================================================================|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
From: birmingh@fnalo.fnal.gov (Phillip J. Birmingham)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Ice-T
Date: 9 Jan 93 13:45:49 GMT
Organization: Deep Thirteen
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalo.fnal.gov

In article <C0KI4x.HJ9@unix.portal.com>, mykes@shell.portal.com (mike myke schwartz) writes:

         [a good thoughtful article in which this oft-repeated tidbit stuck
    in my craw]

> Ice-T
> earn(s) anti-respect (from  me at least).

         Why? What did he do? (Note, I am being deliberately obtuse, but
    there's a point.)

-- 
 Phillip J. Birmingham   birmingh@fnal.fnal.gov  
 I don't speak for Fermilab, although my mouth is probably big enough...
From: gpalo@digi.lonestar.org (Gerry Palo)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Talking bout Rush and the Great Conspiracy
Date: 8 Jan 93 17:48:13 GMT
Organization: DSC Communications Corp, Plano, TX

>: Oh well - as the old cliche has it, Conservatives think
>: that Liberals are wrong; Liberals think that Conservatives
>: are stupid.
>: chus
>: pyotr
>: 
>
> Except for Rush, who thinks liberals are part of an evil,
> insidious conspiracy to destroy the American Way of Life.
>
>  Bill

This sounds like liberal legend created by folks who never listen to him but who
know all they need to know about him.  "Rush is a strong and outspoken conservative,
therefore he must also believe in left wing conspiracies."  In fact he goes
out of his way to put down conspiracy types who call in - e.g. Bilderberger,
New World Order, Illuminati etc.  No, Rush does not think liberals are 
a part of a conspiracy.  Yes he thinks they are stupid. Also elitist, arrogant,
holier-than-thou, hypocritical, etc.  But not conspiratorial.

As every good conspiracy type knows, Rush himself must be part of an insiduous 
conspiracy, since he strongly supported Skull-and-Bones Bush -- against Buchanan 
and also right up to the election.  Rush Limbaugh, Illuminatist.

Gerry Palo (73237.2006@compuserve.com)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: mykes@shell.portal.com (mike myke schwartz)
Subject: Re: Bush's Pardons
Organization: Portal Communications Company
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 18:49:30 GMT

dodsonsl@memstvx1.memst.edu wrote:
: In article <C0J7zq.J7G@unix.portal.com>, mykes@shell.portal.com 
: (mike myke schwartz) writes:
: > 
: > It sickened and withered when the Democratic Fascist Party of America
: > gained enough power to use it's army of secret police and government
: > agencies to maintain its power.  They stand in the way of the
: > country's best interests to maintain its power.  Their clear desire is
: > to control all three branches of our government.
: >
: 
: What a conspiracy theorist! The Democrats have an "army of secret 
: police"? You can't honestly think this. Isn't the goal of the Repub-
: lican party also to "control all three branches of government"?
: 

Not a theory, my friend.  It is evident from watching a couple of hours
of congress on C-SPAN.  The army of secret police are the guys who dug
through boxes of old documents in peoples' garages looking for ANY kind
of dirt on Clarence Thomas.  Throw in the tens of thousands of congressional
staffers who are at the congress critters' beck and call.  And twice in
my lifetime, liberals in power have called out the national guard against
our citizens.

The republicans would indeed like to control at least the white house and
congress.  With just a minimal control of the senate, a lot of socialistic
bullshit was set right (1981-1984).


: -Scott
: &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
: %  PARENTAL WARNING:  Even though you are most probably one of the majority,  &
: &  a single-parent household leader with little responsibility, we feel the   %
: %  need to warn you so that in case you decide to supervise your delinquent   &
: &  brats, you will know that we, conservative Christian moralist freaks, have %
: %  determined with our infinite mental powers that the material in this       &
: &  post is not only obscene, lewd, lascivious, provocative, ambitious,        %
: %  cynical, destructive, stimulating, and creative, but it is also (we have   &
: &  real proof somewhere) obviously a missive straight from Satan, commanding  %
: %  Amerika's youth to turn to communism, sodomy, Satanism, and, of course,    &
: &  drugs and voting Libertarian.                                              %
: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: kkopp@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (koppenhoefer kyle cramm)
Subject: Re: Bush's Pardons
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 21:06:24 GMT


  Let me ask you a question about the Constitution.  Who is commander-in-chief
of the US Armed Forces?  The Prez, right?  So, how can Congress pass a law
limiting the powers of armies distribution by the President?  Sounds like 
Reagan should have gone after the law as unconsitutional instead of playing
spy master.
 With that said, the only remaining question is:  How can people go to jail 
for breaking a law which is unconsitutional?  Oh yeah, they lied to congress!
Well, since congress had already overstepped it's bounds, then they should
have been lied to.
From: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Liberal media (was Re: What Liberals have done to us already, not what t)
Date: 11 Jan 93 07:04:14 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

In article <C0My1K.3AD@unix.portal.com> mykes@shell.portal.com (mike myke schwartz) writes:

>As for MASH, what kind of image of the military do you think its message
>intended to leave?  Those who were in the military because they cared about 
>the military were all depicted as idiots, sex maniacs, incompetents, and the
>like.

Was Col. Potter an idiot, a sex maniac, or incompetent?    Too bad you
blew an otherwise correct statement with an overenthusiastic "all".
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: rj24@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Robert  Johnston)
Subject: Re: Colorado Amendment 2
Reply-To: rj24@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Robert  Johnston)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 19:36:48 GMT

In article <C0JsDw.Iqo@news.cso.uiuc.edu> kkopp@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (koppenhoefer kyle cramm) writes:
>mykes@shell.portal.com (mike myke schwartz) writes:
>>: 
>>: 
>>: If voting for laws that stops the process of people losing rights and 
>>: being treated as second class citizens is "Radical Liberalism", then 
>>: B'God, let's have more of it!  More Rights for everyone, or........?
>>: 
>
>>Laws won't change anything.  Laws protecting blacks have only allowed a
>>small percentage any real success, and all statistical evidence is that
>>blacks do live like 2nd class citizens.  I can start with unemployment
>>rats, income, and health statistics to prove it.  
>

Mike:

Do you have something better to suggest? I would suggest a huge 
increase in spending on early childhood education, but I somehow
get the feeling you wouldn't like that either.

>Actually, the more legal rights a group has the less tolerant the general 
>public tends to be.  Two examples:  (1)  America has much less restrictive
>abortion laws than in Europe; however, Europe is much more tolerant of unwed
>mothers.  

I didn't know that "europe" had any laws on abortion. If you meant 
Ireland and Poland, I suggest that you check a map of europe and
find the other countries there.

>(2)  The Americans with Disabilities act requires a large number
>of handicapped parking places at new facilities, and I have heard a large
>amount of grumbling from people about the excess spots ( also noticed more
>non-handicapped using handicapped spots ).  

I have heard many people who were very glad to have a handicapped spot
available, so they didn't have to walk a couple of hundred yards on
bad legs.

Are you saying we should get rid of anything that some people
grumble about? I didn't know youe were an anarchist.

>The general feeling is 'well,
>you have your rights and will get nothing more' when rights are legislated.
>The black community is just one example of 'rights' gone astray.
>

It is a mistake to equate the black community with publicity seekers
such as Al Sharpton. Should I equate conseratives with Buchanan, 
or Duke? In any group there will be those who are out there for only
money, fame, and power.


What do you mean by rights gone astray? As far as I can tell, this is 
meaningless, racist inuendo. Correct me if I am wrong.

Robert Johnston
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 22:24:03 EST
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: WHY DOES RUSH MISPRONOUNCE NAMES?
 <1imkcaINNs69@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>

In article <1imkcaINNs69@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, aa680@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Vern
Morrison) says:

>>Regular listeners will notice that Rush likes to say the last names of
>>Robert Reich and Mario Cuomo differently than most people are accustomed
>>to.  If anybody knows why he's doing this, let me know at the above
>>address.  Thanks!

>      I know why he does it.  You may not have noticed this, but I have,
>along with millions of *intelligent* people.  The reason Rush mispronounces
>names is because he's a world-class asshole.

That's right, Fern.  People who screw around with other people's names are
real assholes!  I tell you, Morrisey, you've opened my eyes today.  Anyway,
I assume I'll never see you making any posts about 'Retch Limpball', and
that whoever does so will hereforth be branded an 'asshole.'

Catch you later, Fern!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Kurt  E.  Ludwick     | If PRO is the opposite of CON, then
 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -|
 kel111@psuvm.psu.edu  |             what's the opposite of Progress...?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: ctrexp4@caa.mrs.umn.edu (UMM Comp Serv Staff)
Subject: A new fan
Keywords: One of the few
Organization: University of Minnesota, Morris
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 19:41:06 GMT

Hello to all those Rush fans out there.  I just became interested in Rush 
recently when I realized his views and beliefs were similar to mine.  I have 
a favor to ask of all of you out there,  I'm interested in doing a paper on 
how people view Rush's speaking skills, that is disregarding his views and 
focusing primarily on his speaking skills.  Any opinions out there, I would 
love to hear them.

Sincerely,

Jami Pagnac
(A student at the University of Minnesota, Morris)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
From: kkopp@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (koppenhoefer kyle cramm)
Subject: clari.feature.*
Summary: Is there a netnews tie in to G. Will
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 01:00:57 GMT
Keywords: George Will, features

   The news server I am using has a clari.feature.mike-royko, and several
other columnists.  Is George Will on net news and we don't subscribe?  I
figured someone who reads this regularly would know the answer.

Thanks in advance,

Kyle


Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:12321 soc.women:22570 alt.child-support:4374 talk.abortion:55460
From: bobk@dogear.spk.wa.us (Bob Kirkpatrick)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.women,alt.child-support,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: What can we expect from President Hillary Clinton?
Date: 12 Jan 93 20:49:45 GMT
Organization: Dog Ear'd Systems of Spokane, WA

ARCHER@utkvm1.utk.edu (T. Archer) writes:

> In article <C0qyqB.Ez1@unix.portal.com> mykes@shell.portal.com (mike myke sch
> >were created during their combined 12 years in office?  If you also
> >are an anti-reagan fanatic/fool, what do you make of the 20,000,000
> >NEW jobs that were created during his 8 years in office, which included
> >a recession MUCH worse than the one during Bush's term?
> 
> Not to say that this isn't a valid subject, but could be get it out of alt.
> sex, please?

And alt.child-support.

---
Bob Kirkpatrick <bobk@dogear.spk.wa.us>
Dog Ear'd Systems of Spokane, WA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh