HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: shyam@netcom.com (Shyam K. Subramanyan)
Subject: Gators clinch SEC East!
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 21:07:28 GMT


Florida beats Vandy 41-21 to clinch SEC east.
Shane Mathews made three touchdown passes...

Go Gators! Go for twopeat against FSU and threepeat against Alabama!

I heard that Bobby Bowden is taking his team for extra practice
today... -:)
-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shyam Subramanyan			shyam@netcom.com

A damn proud UF (The only real University in Florida) Alumni

God must be a Gator. He made the sky blue and the sun orange!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Ohio State-John Cooper
Date: 22 Nov 92 03:39:22 EST
Distribution: na

In article <1992Nov20.171040.4903@cbnews.cb.att.com>, chill@cbnews.cb.att.com (daniel.a.miller) writes:
> 	I'm very new to this group, so excuse me if I am asking something
> that may have already been discussed. 
> 
> 	Has anyone heard the rumor that if John Cooper is fired from coaching
> at Ohio State, the his replacement could be Bo Schembechler?? Hope I
> go the spelling right!!
> 
> - Dan
> 


His replacement is going to be Glen Mason (or Blackney). Bo know football
butt Bo's doctor can't find shoes to match the bag!!!!!!


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: wingfiel@lonestar.utsa.edu (Kevin J. Wingfield)
Subject: Re: TEXAS aTm - got screwed
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 02:00:59 GMT




            Yo Njan

            Until you know anything about the game
            of football, don't speak.
            First and most important, The
            SWC consist of schools (8) in Texas,
            therefor teams must go thru a rival
            week iin week out.  Not like
            some of the cross state rivals
            where some states consit of just two schools
            ... so we'll we will talk later
            when the Ags beat their oppenent
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: Super Conference to end East Coast Bias...
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 00:42:15 GMT

In article <1992Nov22.014417.74436@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> mlsa@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MICHAEL LAUREN SHERMAN) writes:
>In article <1em1e8INNga1@agate.berkeley.edu>, hackett@ocf.berkeley.edu (William
>Hackett) writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>What about UCLA,USC,Stanford,Cal, Texas,Texas A&M,Rice , and Houston
>>forming a Super Texas California Conference to Dominate The East Coast
>>in everything.  Acacdemically would be one of the stongest conferences
>>bar none including Ivy Leauge..  All Schools have a descent Academic
>>record..  Atheletically With Texas TexasA&M UCLA USC perenally football
>>powers.  Stanford and Texas womens basketball, baseball,Track, Swimming
>>and Diving top 5...  UCLA Stanford Texas and Houston Basketball powers
>>
>>Hey this conference has it all. Then Pac Ten can expand adding a couple
>>of teams maybe a San Jose St.... SWC can add UTEP and UTSA or maybe
>>we just merge whats left of those conferences...
>>
>>Texas and Calfornia Team up to End EAST COAST BIAS and create the best
>>conference in everything :-) Bar NONE!!!
>Except the ACC Basketball, Football.  Academics: Duke, UVa, Wake, Clemson, Ga.

Academics! ACC! Hmm.. this is getting more funnier every day.

One would assume that PAC10 (Stanford, Cal, UCLA ) or Big10 (Michigan,
NWestern, Purdue, Illinois...) would come ahead. 
(Not counting Ivy league, of course)

>Tech, Maryland and UNC  Golf, Women's Basketball:  Va, Maryland etc.  I
>suppose I could go on, But there is only so much I can say to an Idiot like
>you except that not only does the ACC currently exist, but this T/C conference
>is just impossible, read any of the earlier posts about UofT and aTm getting
>held hostage by the Texas Legislature.  Grow A Brain.
>-- 
>MICHAEL LAUREN SHERMAN

Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Subject: Re: re: fsu!
Reply-To: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 22:53:55 GMT

In article <news.rice.edu-161192143635@128.42.239.21> news.rice.edu (mls)  
writes:
> Face it, fsu hasn't exactly been playing powerhouses, so
> get off your high horse....

No, Miami is the WORST.  I bet they won't even go to a BOWL!
NC State sucks!  So does Carolina!  They'll both stay home.  
Florida is a push-over!  They should be #0!  It's sooo easy
to beat Clempsun at Death Valley, and FSU only won by 4.
Georgia Tech must have been lousy, too.  Wake Forest can't beat
anybody.  Those seven wins must be Charlie's typo.  Maryland is
the worst team ever!  Virginia NEVER can be any good.

But seriously, Duke and Tulane sucked.  Even though Duke's
record vs. the SWC is 7-1.  Sounds pretty weak to me.  Even
though I like A&M.

Duke's next win: Sept. 18, 1993 vs. Army.

--
************* "How about a little fire, Scarecrow?" **************
Orin Day, Code 664.1                    oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov
Hughes STX/NASA       GSFC Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics
*******"Think that this is NASA's opinion?   NO, NO, NO!!!" ******
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: willers@trombone.sps.mot.com (Robert Willers)
Subject: Arizona State 7, Arizona 6 in Tucson
Summary: Two In A Row
Keywords: defense
Organization: Motorola, Inc., Semiconductor Products Sector
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 05:58:22 GMT

Arizona State beat Arizona by a score of 7-6 in Tucson tonight.  Both
defenses were dominant.  Arizona made two of three early field goal
attempts, but turned the ball over twice inside the ASU 5 yard
line (an interception by Lenny McGill and a fumble by Chuck Levy
on an attempted halfback pass -- Arizona had its biggest problems
offensively when they tried to get fancy).  ASU, for the most part,	
couldn't move the ball, but senior Kevin Galbreath broke a 51-yard
TD run, breaking four UofA tackles.  After that run, the ASU defense 
woke up and shut down Arizona.  A 57-yard field goal attempt with
the wind with five minutes remaining in the fourth quarter fell
maybe a yard short.

Obviously, ASU is the number one team in the nation due to the
famous r.s.f.c transitivity theory, since they beat Arizona by one
point in Tucson, while the "ranked" number one team, Miami, beat
them by one at home.  :) :) :) :)

Seriously, Washington State (as numerous others have mentioned)
definitely deserves a bowl bid.  I'll also take a 6-5 ASU team
over any 6-5 Big Eleven team.  (I'm SO glad Iowa lost tonight.)
-- 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Boring Disclaimer: The opinion(s) expressed herein are mine alone. |
| Bob Willers                           willers@trombone.sps.mot.com |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kevink@fugitive.soac.bellcore.com (Kevin Klinge)
Subject: Rutgers/Independence Bowl/UVa question
Organization: Bell Communications Research
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 20:14:59 GMT

This is kind of a two parter:

With Rutgers' (6-4) win over WVU this past weekend and their matchup this
coming weekend against Temple (1-9), they have a great shot a 7-4 record
and a possible Independence Bowl bid.

Does anyone know the other teams being considered for the Independence Bowl 
as well?  Usually, this bowl gets a team or two that just sneaks into bowl 
eligibility (last year's bid to a 6-5 Arkansas is a good example).

Also, do any of the UVa people (Charlie or Jay?) know which bowl UVa is 
being considered for and what reps will be at this weekend's game in 
Blacksburg?  This game is a MUST WIN for UVa (6-4, five 1-A victories) 
if it has any post-season aspirations.

Still, I have a slight hunch that the Independence Bowl people might be 
looking at UVa as well as Rutgers to fill a slot, although I'm not 
altogether sure.

-- 

Kevin H. Klinge
Bell Communications Research
kevink@soac.bellcore.com

 \\\\    ////////////////////////      ||||\\      //||||
  \\\\  ////////////////////////        |||\\\    ///|||
   \\\\////       /////                 ||| \\\  /// |||
    \\\///       /////                  |||  \\\///  |||
     \\//       /////                  |||||  \\//  |||||
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: harbinjm@infonode.ingr.com (Mitch Harbin)
Subject: Re: Roll Tide down the Polls!
Summary: Just sour grapes
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 21:24:00 GMT

In article <dkm2.721803415@Isis.MsState.Edu>, dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K. Magee) writes:
> 
> You saw it on ESPN.  Mississippi State may have lost, but did get 301 yards 
> on the former #1 defense in the nation.  The tide won on luck, and lost
> 3 defensive players, so Auburn should have an advantage. 
> 

No, I saw it in person, and you folks were green around the gills for the first
half and the fourth quarter.  Yes you did well with the wind in the third and
when BAMA tried the finesse stuff, (reverses and  such).  But then in the
fourth, we got back to smash mouth football and kicked your ass 10 points to
zip.  Ain't no luck to it bub, we make our breaks.  But then you folks should
have expected it since we kick your ass every year anyway.  Just sour grapes.
At least Jackie is pulling for us (I listened to his postgame show on the way
home) and at least he has some class.

> I do believe John James took care of Mr. Curry, and MSU showed bama what 
> an offensive line is all about.
> 
One quarter does not a footbal game make.  And I think Mr. Curry held is own
against a big mouth pop off.  James was right about some unfinished business
from last year and we finished it off last night very well.  By the way I
saw your freshman (under a pile of white shirts several times) and he did'nt
last long.
> TAMU to #2  !!!!
> 
Just sour grapes. Coach Sherrill, now that's a man with class, pulling for the
conference.  Maybe he will go to a class school after this year.
> 
> David
> 
> P.S.  Oh yeah bama fans, Things tend to drown in New Orleans when a
> hurricane comes in.
> 
At least we'll be in New Orleans, where will you be? the poulan bowl over
in Shreveport.  You went to the Liberty last year and completely embarressed
the SEC.  But since you are in the SEC, I hope you get a good bowl game and
do well.  Remember, Big Brother BAMA brings in lots of TV money and bowl
money that we share with you folks.  And I always want all our conference
teams to do well when we play in bowls and out of conference.  So good luck
to you Bulldogs.
> 
> -- 
>                David K. Magee | "Mandrake! Get over here and feed me that  
>          MIS Graduate Student |  belt boy.  The Redcoats are coming! "
>  Mississippi State University |
>           dkm2@ra.msstate.edu |   -  General Jack Ripper, Dr. Strangelove 


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: acdendy@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (ROGER DENDY)
Subject: Roger's Top 25--16 Nov
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 16 Nov 1992 12:04 EST  

The Top 25, overall, went down in weight this week, with four of the top 
five playing weak teams, and one of them (Nebraska) losing.  The only 
strong opponent was Miss. St. for Alabama, and Bama's win propelled them 
into the 3 spot.  Florida St, Alabama, and Miami are now tied to within one 
one-hundredth of a point.

Team			Weight
----			------
1 Washington (9-1)	2.5
2 Florida St (9-1)	2.2
3 Alabama (10-0)	2.2
4 Miami Fl (9-0)	2.2	Game of the Week:	4 Miami Fl
5 Notre Dame (8-1-1)	2.0				  vs
6 Michigan (8-0-2)	1.9				8 Syracuse
7 Texas A&M (10-0)	1.9
8 Syracuse (9-1)	1.9	Alternate GotW:		6 Michigan
9 Stanford (8-3)	1.9				  vs
10 Ohio St (8-2)	1.9				10 Ohio State
11 Georgia (8-2)	1.8
12 USC (6-2-1)		1.8	Ugly Game otW:		22 Kansas
13 Colorado (8-1-1)	1.7				   vs
14 Florida (7-2)	1.7				97 Missouri
15 Arizona (6-3-1)	1.7
16 Nebraska (7-2)	1.7
17 N C State (8-2-1)	1.6	Media Bias Winner:	Fill in your pick
18 Tennessee (6-3)	1.6				I haven't seen the
19 Miss St (7-3)	1.5				polls.
20 Texas (6-3)		1.5			Nomination: 34 Penn St
21 Bowling Green (9-2)	1.5	Media Bias Loser Nominee: 21 Bowling Green
22 Kansas (7-3)		1.4
23 N Carolina (7-3)	1.4
24 Hawaii (7-2)		1.4
25 Bost Coll (7-2-1)	1.4

At the bottom of the list, the MAC is beginning to finish up its schedule, 
and the rankings are firming up.  Ohio U is convincingly in last, though a 
dismal loss by Cal St Fullerton could allow the Titans to step over the 
Bobcats in the race for the bottom.

98 Tulane (2-8)		0.2
99 Temple (1-9)		0.2
100 SW Louisiana (2-8)	0.1	Crummy Game ot Week:	100 SW La.
101 Navy (1-8)		0.1				    vs
102 Kent (2-9)		0.0				103 Ark. St.
103 Ark St (1-8)	0.0
104 UTEP (1-9)		0.0
105 E Michigan (1-10)	-0.0
106 Cal St Fultn (2-8)	-0.1
107 Ohio (1-10)		-0.3

R Dendy
From: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov (Orin Day)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Georgia 14, Auburn 10
Date: 18 Nov 92 22:11:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: nsisrv.1992Nov18.221100.10174
Reply-To: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center

In article <1992Nov18.180501.19133@nntpserver.chevron.com>  
hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde) writes:
> (Scott Barman) writes:
> >>Georgia 14
> >>Auburn 10

> >BTW: This was the 100th Anniversary of the first meeting between the two
> >schools.  At 100 years, this is the oldest rivalry in the South.
> 
> I think the LSU-TooLame "rivalry" is also 100 years old as of this year.
> 
> --J.J.

I'm pretty sure that the Duke (then Trinity College)/UNC rivalry
is older than 100 years.  

--
************* "How about a little fire, Scarecrow?" **************
Orin Day, Code 664.1                    oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov
Hughes STX/NASA       GSFC Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics
*******"Think that this is NASA's opinion?   NO, NO, NO!!!" ******
From: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com (David Head)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: fsu and A&M was(Re: Roll Tide down the
Date: 19 Nov 92 14:40:37 GMT
Reply-To: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne  FL


>In article <BxvDIq.4Dq@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Todd Henderson) >writes:

 >  jeff@jlk.b11.ingr.com (Jeff Kilpatrick) writes:

 >  >Stuff about Bama being number 2 because they came back to beat MSU and what
>   >being #2 (or should be #3 A&M's case) in the country means.


 > >>  Being #2 in the country does not mean you have to beat the pants off the #16
 > >>(or whatever) team in the country.  Being able to come back and win (especially on
 > >>the road) the way Bama did against a fine Mississippi State team certainly

 > >Tell this to the pollesters and the fsu crew about A&M.  
 > >Is there any precedent(sp?) of a 1 lose team leap frogging a no lose team?
 > >Recently there has been the 1 tie leap frog, but with a lose.  So far
 > >no one has proved they are better than us, someone has proved they are
 > >better than fsu.

 > >Todd

>Since I'm neither an FSU nor an A&M fan, I hope I'm impartial on this
>one (I'm one of those "obnoxious Fichigan dolts" we've all heard about
>;-)).  The key words in the above paragraph are "no one" and
>"someone".  The "no one" refers to TAMU's opponents.  A more
>appropriate description could not be chosen (yes, I know, same for
>Michigan).  The "someone" refers to the team that beat FSU, which is
>Miami.  So, TAMU beat a bunch of "no one"'s, while FSU beat themselves
>against a "someone".  I still think FSU is a better team than TAMU,
>and should therefore be ranked higher.  The pollsters seem to agree.



>-Alan Harder
> American Mathematical SOciety
> Michigan Fan
> Drinker of Anchor Steam 



Good points Alan, thanks for the vote of confidence.  I still would rather see
FSU move up due to a TAMU and/or Alabama loss so no one could argue whether we
belonged there or not.  But we'll take what we can get!  By the way, have ya'll
at Michigan gotten over that little game we played together up there last 
season? ;-)  Any chance of giving us a rematch down here in Tallahassee someday?
From: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Nebraska-->Fiesta,CU-->Orange
Date: 19 Nov 92 19:36:38 GMT
Reply-To: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp. (VMS Software Support - Colorado)

--


>  Gosh Marty what happened to yer boys there against Iowa State?

>  Sure are quiet this week...........................

>  Hello Njan, Susan, et al. and the rest of the Buff fans

I posted about 3 times about the Iowa State game. Not much you can say when
your team gets it's butt's beaten, uhum, unless of course you are "certain"
CU fans who whine and piss and moan about it for weeks on end after NU beats
CU 52 - 7. I've seen bratty kids who whine less.

Need I say more?

Husker Henderson

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 M_Henderson               | "Could you please continue the petty bickering?
 Marty Henderson           |  I find it most intriguing."   ---    Data, 
 Woodland Park, Colorado   |  Star Trek, The Next Generation, "Haven"
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Excessive Celebration Penalty/Illini vs EC
Date: 18 Nov 92 04:35:32 EST

In article <1992Nov18.004956.19791@den.mmc.com>, kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com (Kevin Rodgers) writes:
> In article <1992Nov17.083126.1690@cs.hut.fi> killer@robin.cs.hut.fi (Kalle Kivimaa) writes:
>>In <1992Nov16.231316.17607@den.mmc.com> kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com (Kevin Rodgers) writes:
>>
>>>judgement of intent by the officials.  This year, a Colorado player was
>>>penalized after he pointed at a teammate!  Personally, I find the
>>
>>That is specifically prohibited by the rules, so no judgement there...
> 
> My understanding is that the rule in question prohibits taunting, which
> I believe requires the officials to judge the intent of a player's
> actions.  To take this case as an example: how is a simple act of
> recognition of a _teammate_ (who had made a block on the play)
> equivalent to taunting an _opponent_?  It was no different than a
> high-five or a celebratory hug, but the official interpreted it as an
> unsportsmanlike act.  Argh.
> -- 

How can anyone forget what happened to East Carolina vs. Illinois
last year. The 'taunting' call was a scandal. EC should have went
undefeated last year. Illini and EC fans know what I am talking about :/

-Garrett



> Kevin Rodgers				kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com
> Martin Marietta MS A16401		(303) 790-3971
> 116 Inverness Dr. East
> Englewood CO 80112 USA			GO BUFFS!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ped@BNR.CA (Pedro Luna)
Subject: Re: AP make FSU #3
Keywords: FSU and Lee(I'll lobby for a week for my school)Corso suck!
Reply-To: ped@BNR.CA (Pedro Luna)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 19:46:51 GMT

|> In an article <BxsoAu.GMs@encore.com> jfawcett@encore.com (Jason
|> Fawcett) writes:
|>AP
|>
|>1. Miami
|>2. Alabama
|>3. FSU
|>4. Texas A&M
|>

Just a small addendum to the poll...

Rk. W-L-T    vs Top 25   Opp rec
1   9-0-0    3-0-0       27-41-5
2  10-0-0    2-0-0       45-41-1
3   9-1-0    4-1-0       53-37-1
4  10-0-0    1-0-0       41-48-0

....


Beat the Class of '90 hell outta TCU!

Pedro '90

Name:	  Pedro C. Luna	                      |   
E-mail:   ped@bnr.ca                          |   
Org:      Bell-Northern Research              |

"Pico de gallo, you oughta give it a try-o
 even if you're from Ohio, it'll get you by-o.
 Don't get it in your eye-o unless you want to cry-o
 so come on, don't be shy-o, eat some pico de gallo!"

    --- Trout Fishing in America 

       

                                                                   
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: Michigan, ND, Miami etc ...
Organization: University of Michigan
	<BxvC1A.1rC@encore.com> <1992Nov17.235433.7184@leland.Stanford.EDU>
	<ASH.92Nov19091326@ulysses.mr.ams.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:38:30 GMT

In article <ASH.92Nov19091326@ulysses.mr.ams.com> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:

   In article <1992Nov17.235433.7184@leland.Stanford.EDU> gsroka@leland.Stanford.EDU (Gregory Sroka) writes:

      >In article <BxvC1A.1rC@encore.com> jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett) writes:
      >| 
      >> 1. ND played Michigan for a tie.
      >Sorry, you are wrong. (Did you watch that game?)
      >Last week's games demonstrated who settles for ties. 

      >> 2. ND has a loss, Michigan doesn't.
      >FSU has a loss, TexasA&M doesn't.

      >> 3. Lou's headlock on the Ref.
      >Since when is a coach not allowed to care about dangerous plays?

      > 4. ND's fake punt when they were ahead 37-0 over BC.
      >This should impress the pollsters (Mo' points rule).
      >Also, why can't the No. 9 team score over 30 pts. in a half? ND made
      >that mistake vs. Tenn. exactly 1 year previously.
      >At least the punter didn't do a back flip after he made the play.
      >Who would back flip after scoring against Temple, a huge underdog?

      >> 5. ND is the most hated team in football.
      >Wrong.  Miami is. ;) Being hated does not equal lower rating.

      >> 6. All of the above.

      >Gee, real strong arguments. That was too easy. Try again.

   Gee, I think he was having fun.  You know, joking around.  Having a
   laugh.  You know what I mean?  Try again.

I'd like to hear what Jason meant, but I think he was being serious.  The
question was why is UM ranked over ND?  All year long we've heard about how
the polls are based in bullshit.  Jason came up with a list of 6 real biases
that we all know some people hold against ND.  The question isn't "do any of
these have to do with good UM and ND are?" but rather "Do you believe that
some poll voters are influenced by these six points when they go to vote?".
Personally, I think Jason hit the nail right on the head.  

Bill

   -Alan Harder
    American Mathematical SOciety
    Michigan Fan
    Drinker of Anchor Steam 

I respect anybody who thinks about their beer.  I really respect anybody who
thinks about beer enough to know Anchor Steam.  But personally, I think it
sucks. 
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ejohnson@turinghelios.nd.edu (eric johnson)
Subject: Re: Great Big 8 QBs
Reply-To: ejohnson@turinghelios.nd.edu (eric johnson)
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:16:03 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.143251.8737@sparky.imd.sterling.com>, marko@IMD.Sterling.COM (Mark Olson) writes:
|> In a recent followup, I asked about the status of some of the great OU QBs and
|> I got to thinking that there have been a lot of great QBs in the Big 8, what
|> course did their careers take, and what are they up to now?  I've started a
|> list, anybody know about these players? Anybody have anybody to add?
|> 

How about:	Vince Ferigamo - NU alum - Former NFL QB - Rams

Also, wasn't there a Colorado QB (I think he was a QB) that was
pretty good and became a sportscaster for a Denver station. I can't think
of his name.

Eric
GO HUSKERS!!! BEAT SOONERS!!!

Husker joke of the week: What's the difference between a Cyclone and a Hurricane?
			 "At least you know when a Hurricane is coming, those damn
				Cyclones just sneak up on you"