HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Organization: IUPUI Student Activities Office (317) 274-3931
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:17:13 EST
From:         "NATHAN BRINDLE" <NBRINDLE@INDYCMS.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: MS Access database
              16 Nov 1992 14:36:10 -0500 from <jezsik@PX4.STFX.C A>

P.S. Sorry!  Everything I hear about Access is thumbs up.  Everyone I know
who has seen it is jumping around impatiently for it to appear on the
shelves.  There was some discussion on this forum recently about the target
audience but everything I hear about it has me jumping around impatiently
too.

Rebuttals?  :)

-----------------------------------------------------BITNET:  NBRINDLE@INDYCMS
Nathan C. Brindle, Student Activities Office
Staff Advisor, ALPHA PHI OMEGA, TAU OMICRON CHAPTER
Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis
Internet:  NBRINDLE@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU
                                     * * *
                       DON'T BLAME ME, I VOTED FOR PEROT.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: VAXF::IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:30:39 -0700
From:         STRASHEA@ZENO.MSC.COLORADO.EDU
Subject:      Re: Virtual Terminal (xnterm) VTP-V1.1

Tim, does your old terminal work when Windows is in Standard Mode?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: win3-l@uicvm.bitnet
X-VMS-To: WIN
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 23:51:16 -0500
From:         CASSIDYB@WABASH.BITNET
Subject:      ATM v2.5

I got some info about ATM 2.5 last and ordered my upgrade today.

The flyer lists four reasons to upgrade, they are:

        1.  Documents print dramatically faster on LsserJet printers under
          Windows 3.1 because ATM 2.5 automatically creates "soft fonts" that
          dramatically cut printing time.

        2.  Add new fonts - without rebooting Windows!

        3.  Manage fonts more flexibly on PostScript printers, without editing
          the WIN.INI file.

        4. (**) YOU GET 10 FREE BONUS FONTS ($400 value):

                        Times New Roman Condensed (+italic and bold)
                        Gill Extra and Ultra bold,condensed, and condensed bold
                        Monotype Script Bold
                        Onyx

      * 5.  The flyer also claims that it is easier to use and prints faster.

----------------------------------
if you purchased ATM on or after July 19,1992 - the upgrade is FREE!
        -BUT, you don't get the new fonts and have to pay shipping.
---------------------------------

the upgrade costs $29.99
shipping is (i think) $7.49

*there is also an offer for 16 more fonts for an additional $39, and they
aren't half bad.

Brendon Cassidy
cassidyb@WABASH.Bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL7]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 10:44:18 -0500
From:         "David S. Dudley Jr." <dudleyd@HAMLET.UNCG.EDU>
Subject:      Re: File Corrupt, Please Help!!!!!

> He has written his dissertation on a wordperfect 5.1 on a 3.5" disk, and he
> has finished about 43k of writing.  But, now when he retrieves the file in
> wordperfect only 27k is retrieved (upto page 18) and then says that sector
> not found.
>
> We have tried the following things to fix the problem:
>
> The File Allocation table (FAT) has got corrupt so we ran chkdsk to see if
> we can get the lost data.  Chkdsk reports 505 lost allocation units found in
> 103 chains.
> When the /f option is used to convert lost chains to files and the CHK files
> created do not contain the lost data in a very friendly format, 103 chk files
> cannot be pulled into wordperfect as WP reports 'Incompatible File Format'
>
> I have also tried NORTON DISK DOCTOR to fix the file but again it has the
> same problem of CHKDSK.
>
> Is there any way to reorganize the FAT and get back the entire file.
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> Vijay Bollapragada
>

One thing I usually try in the Labs here is to run Recover on the disk
and try to recover the damaged disk.....  This may be the same as CHKDSK
/f  I'm not sure,.. but 8 out of 10 times it recovers the data....
Unless the disk is so bad off it can't


--
David S. Dudley                    ||  ---------
Assistant Lab Manager IRC Dept     ||  |       |
UNC-Greensboro                     ||  ---------
Greensboro, NC, USA                ||  486!            that's the way!
                                   ||
Address:   dudleyd@hamlet.uncg.edu ||
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sat, 21 Nov 1992 21:26:58 -0500
From:         Joe Morris <IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: ProComm + for Windows problem

Date: 19 Nov 1992 10:59:30 -0500
From: "(Louis Jezsik)" <jezsik%PX2.STFX.CA@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu>

> ... (In the problem solver
> section it says if I'm having a problem with the double spacing, it
> has something to do with CR CR/LF between ProComm and the other
> machine ...

Louis,

This is referring to sending output to a printer.  Certain printers add
a line feed when a carriage retuen is received.  If ProComm sends one
and the printer adds one itself, the output comes out double-spaced.
______________________________________________________________________________
Joe Morris at Western Carolina University; Cullowhee, NC    Practice safe hex,
Internet:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU (preferable)       Just say NO to viruses,
BITNET:    IS480P02@WCUVAX1.BITNET        And always wear a write-protect tab.
ALL-IN-1 mail users:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU@IN
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L%UICVM.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU"
X-VMS-Cc: CMCGREW
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 09:22:44 -0500
From:         CMCGREW@UCSVAX.UCS.UMASS.EDU
Subject:      Re: ATM FOnts and Windows

I know a lot of people don't like OS/2 (at least on this list they don't	seem
 to); but, it includes an Adobe Type Manager for both Windows and
OS/2.  If you are thinking of getting it anyway, it only costs $99 and
you would spend close to that on ATM by itself.  The new service packs
from IBM support True Type for Windows too.

There are a number of commercial products on the market that will convert
between TT, ATM and several other formats.  They vary in price from $99
to about $300.


Good Luck
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 08:12:06 -0500
From:         Jameson Spence <jess@NEXUS.YORKU.CA>
Subject:      Re: No Windows NT for us...

On Mon, 16 Nov 1992, STRASHEA@ZENO.MSC.COLORADO.EDU wrote:

> Hmmm, who's been putting the bullcrap in your pants?  We have an
> evaluation copy of NT and right now it is working.

I concur... I recently attended INTEROP in San Francisco where Microsoft
had WIN NT running on both an Intel based 486-33 and a RISC Based system.
In fact I attended a seminar entitled Unix as a LAN Operating system where
Microsoft defended Nt against 7 UNIX companies (Univell, SCO, SUN etc.) It
was quit interesting that IBM was not even at the table for the
discussion, they could have been there representing either AIX or OS/2. I
really think that Microsoft has made a concrete move to satisfy the DOS,
Windows, OS/2 and UNIX markets with NT. They should be complimented on
their attempt to tackle a complicated and diverse market place.

From a development point of view the Microsoft API is a breath of fresh
air, finally I will be able to migrate my Windows 3.1 applications across
various hardware environments, and even migrate any 32 Bit applications I
develop back to WIN 3.1. It is most definably going to reshape desktop and
server computing industry.

....Jamie

============================================================================
Jameson Spence                          E-mail: jess@nexus.yorku.ca
Information Administrator               IP Address: shogun.ccs.yorku.ca
Telecommunications
017D Steacie, York University           tel: (416) 736 - 2100  x. 22717
Toronto, Canada, M3J 1P3                fax: (416) 736 - 5700
============================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sat, 21 Nov 1992 08:13:34 -0500
Reply-To:     mpelley@kean.ucs.mun.ca
From:         mpelley@KEAN.UCS.MUN.CA
Subject:      win graphic image viewers

I'm looking for a graphic image viewer/manipulater for windows.  Something like
+ the VX (or XV?) system on VAXs.  Images are of the type GIF, TIFF, etc.

E-mail me any responses.
Thanx,
   Mike
==================================
"I is a coolege stoodint," wouldn't ya know?
mpelley@kean.ucs.mun.ca
==================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 13:22:00 EST
From:         "JFT@NCCIBM1.BITNET" <JFT@NCCIBM1.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Stealth compatible monitors?

Hi Bruce,

  So what's the answer?  What if I want to run in turbo
mode, and WIN Enhaced but it doesn't work with the Stealth
boeard?  I want to get a board that doesn't have all these
problems, what is the best one?  ATI?

  Thanks,

John.

> Greetings!
>
> John writes:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >  Does anyone know what a NEX 3D is capable of?  I have a 3D and
> >had nothing but trouble when I tried to install my Diamond
> >Stealth card.  I called tech support a few times, but it didn't
> >help.  It has been almost a year now, the card is sitting at
> >home in its box still.  I can't remeber the problems I had,
> >I think it kept locking up when I started windows, or I could
> >start windows but Pagemaker would lock, something like that.
> >Maybe I can trade it in for and ATI or one of those other boards?
> >
> >  Any comments, flames, suggestions appreciated
>
> Well, how about just comments and suggestions?
>
> First off, if it's been almost a year, you will probably want to get the
> latest drivers for the Stealth.  They are available via ftp as STL110.EXE.  I
> presume that Diamond's tech support has talked you through excluding certain
> memory areas from use by whatever memory manager you're using (emm386, qemm,
> etc.).  I'm also assuming that they told you to turn off the 'turbio bios
> access' and 'alternate timing' dip switches on the card itself to see if that
> helps.  Also, the NEC 3D must have switch 1 off and switch 2 on.  If possible,
> you should also experiment with running windows in both standard and enhanced
> modes.  I have noticed that some bugs with the stealth and its drivers will
> manifest themselves under standard mode but not enhanced.  Perhaps the reverse
> of that is true also.  Also, you should try all the different resolutions for
> which you have drivers, i.e. 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768 and see if the problem
> recurs.
>
> I have bellyached to this list before about how buggy Diamond's drivers are
> and how basically unresponsive Diamond is to problems.  From what I
> understand, their drivers are written by a third party company, but that's no
> excuse for Diamond.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> .......
> :  o/ : Bruce Hulsey
> : <|  : Univ. of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
> : / > : internet: bbhulsey@life.uams.edu
> :.....: bitnet:   bbhulsey@uams
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 10:13:00 EST
From:         Michael Gordon <GORDONM@DENISON.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: ATM FOnts and Windows

>
>Having used Adobe Type Manager 1.1, 1.15, and 2.0 with Windows 3.0 and
>3.1, I can say that it was perfectly compatible with everything I used
>but that I finally deleted it in favor of sticking with True Type fonts
>in Windows 3.1 (not yet supported by OS/2).  While I understand there
>may be some technical reasons for sticking with ATM Type 1 postscript
>fonts, they were moot points for me. Especially for 300 dpi laser
>printer output, no one I know could tell the difference between Adobe
>and True Type; TT was faster on the screen and in printing; there are
>simply more TT fonts out there at lower cost (quantity/cost linked here,
>I'm not talking about absolute numbers of fonts available) and they're
>just fine, IMHO.
>
        For what it's worth, ATM 2.5 will probably be as fast as TT.

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  18-NOV-1992 10:13:32
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 11:37:50 -0600
From:         d89pe@IDEPC51.IDE.HK-R.SE
Subject:      Re: Windows Programmer FAQ: HELP!!!

HELP! I can't unzip any of the FAQ!

I can uudecode them. But when I unzip them I get the error message
following error:

PKUNZIP: Warning! FAQPRG.ZIP - error in ZIP use PKZipFix

Anyone have a clue what I am doing wrong?

	/ Eken / The Oak / Die Eiche / De Eik / Hrast / O Carvalho
	/ Le Che^ne / La Encina / Roble / To"lgy / Kashi / Eiken
	/ Alon / An Crann Daire / Xiang Shu / Quercus / Velanidia =
	Paer Ekelund / Tranbaers v 19:4 / 372 38 RONNEBY / SWEDEN =
	d89pe@pt.hk-r.se / d89pe@ide.ide.hk-r.se.

If you know how to spell The Oak in other languages please E-mail me.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 07:58:00 CST
From:         Bernstein_Phil@LANMAIL.NCSC.NAVY.MIL
Subject:      RE: COMPUSERVE / INTERNET MAIL

To send to a Compuserve mailbox from Internet use the following:

   NNNNN.NNNN%compuserve.com@ihb.compuserve.com

Where 'NNNNN.NNNN' represents the Compuserve ID for example
'75903.1078', note you must use the '.' instead of the ',' that
Compuserve uses in it's addressing scheme.  Also you may be able to send
directly to 'NNNNN.NNNN@compuserve.com' from your host, but bouncing it
off 'ihb.compuserve.com' is what works here.

To mail from Compuserve to the Internet use the following:

>INTERNET yourname@host.place.number.type

Note: you must put 'INTERNET' all in caps.

I think you can receive the WIN3-L mail at Compuserve by sending your
SUBSCRIBE message from compuserve.

REMEMBER Compu$erve charges a $.15 surcharge fro each message sent to
the INTERNET or READ (not received only read) from the INTERNET.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:        UK.AC.LIV.UXB; 20 NOV 92 20:56:46 GMT
X-Mailer:   ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:58:54 GMT
From:         "Mr. D.F. Hartley" <dennis1@UXB.LIV.AC.UK>
Subject:      IBM Pageprinter Problem

I have just installed Windows 3.1 and W4W 2.0b on a PC clone with an IBM
4216 Personal Pageprinter as the default printer. The printer uses a hard-
ware port EPT to talk to the printer. Ths problem is that I cannot set the
timeout settings in the printer connect menu if I print to EPT - if I don't
print to EPT I dont get any printout just the postscript header in text form!
Because the timeout can't be set - the menu is grayed out in that part - I
keep getting a printer stalled message from Print Manager, if I keep 'resuming'
I get a perfect printout.

The question is is there any other way of setting the timeout settings???


			Dennis

+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/|               Dennis Hartley              |\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\|
|  Telephone:   | Languages Centre, University of Liverpool |     Fax:      |
| 051 794 2756  |      P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX      | 051-794-2748  |
|\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\|        dennis1@uxb.liverpool.ac.uk        |/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/|
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <golde@cs.washington.edu>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 09:59:42 -0800
From:         Hellmut Golde <golde@CS.WASHINGTON.EDU>
Subject:      A W4W question on formatting

I have the following problem.  I often type multi-page letters,
where the first page is on letterhead.  The letterhead has a
number of names from top to bottom along the left edge; hence it
must be formatted with a larger left margin.  The next pages are
blank and thus require a smaller left margin.

I know that you can format the two differently using different
"divisions" or "sections" or whatever they are now called.  This
requires, however, that the second page starts on a new
paragraph.

I would like to simply begin typing and have W4W change the
margins (via style change) whenever I finish page 1 and start
typing page 2.  Is there any way to accomplish this, perhaps via
a macro?

Any help is gratefully received.

Hellmut Golde
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Posted-Date:  20 Nov 92 13:18 EST
Acknowledge-To:  Vince Scarafino <Scarafino@MULTICS-A.PMS.FORD.COM>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 13:16:00 EST
From:         Vince Scarafino <Scarafino@MULTICS-A.PMS.FORD.COM>
Subject:      MakeProcInstance()

Thanks to Robert Benavidez for his Microsoft Developer's Network CD
recommendation.  It finally arrived yesterday, and it's pretty nice.
However, I've got some questions on some of the terms in my reading, and
their implications.  I'd appreciate any help.

MakeProcInstance requires an instance handle to associate the particular
procedure instance with.  For what I am doing, it is normally the
"current instance of the application" which I understand is a handle to
the process that did the main initialization.  When using C or C++, you
have the handle because you did the initialization.  In my case the
application was initialized by Visual Basic.  Is there a way to request
this handle?

There is a GetCurrentTask() function that returns a handle of the
current, running task.  Is there a difference with this handle, which is
to a task, and the application instance handle, which I presume is a
handle to a process, not a task?  I would think so, but don't know.

Also, there is a comment in MakeProcInstance that states if the address
specified identifies a procedure in a dynamic-link library, that
MakeProcInstance returns the same address specified.  Can someone clear
up why?  Does this mean there is no need to call MakeProcInstance if you
are sure you are calling a procedure in a dynamic-link library?  (I know
that may not be a good programming practice for obvious reasons, but
would it work?)  Is there something *else* I need to do for the case of
a procedure in a dynamic-link library?

The callback function I am trying to get to work gets called properly.
However, something else trashes the local variable area for the function
being called prior to control being passed to the function.  I'm
obviously doing something wrong, but am stumped at this point.  As
stated before, any help would be appreciated.

Vince
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Encoding: 30 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 13:38:00 PST
From:         DAJ@ABS.NLC-BNC.CA
Subject:      WP for Windows (printing)

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WHEN I TRY TO PRINT A 50 PAGE DOCUMENT (LJIII W/1MEG) USING THE WINDOWS
> PRINTER DRIVER AND PRINT MANAGER, PRINTING STOPS AFTER 26 PAGES AND THE
> PRINTER GIVES AN OUT OF MEMORY ERROR.  IF I USE THE WP DRIVERS EVERYTHING
> PRINTS.  DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM IS AND IS THERE ANYWAY AROUND IT?
> I PREFER TO USE THE WIN DRIVER.

One of the _problems_ with the Windows drivers, is that they work according
to the Printer Setup data, and not according to the printer itself. By that
I mean, if the printer has 1MB of installed RAM, and the Printer Setup says
that the printer has 1.5MB of RAM, Windows will send up to 1.5MB of data at
one go. Obviously, the printer cannot handle all this, and will produce
errors -- one of which could be the "Out of memory" condition you are
referring to.

The moral of the story? Make sure that the Printer configuration in Windows
matches the physical printer specs.

Another thing: are you attempting to use a "whole mess" of soft fonts? It
seems that WP and Windows handle printer drivers and fonts COMPLETELY
differently....

*----------------------------------------------------------------------*
|     Darryl Johnson                 Internet: DAJ@ABS.NLC-BNC.CA      |
|     Programmer/Analyst             Voice:    (819) 994-6846          |
|     National Library of Canada     FAX:      (819) 953-0291          |
|  ** Personal, not National Library, opinions in ALL cases.... **     |
*----------------------------------------------------------------------*
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 18:11:58 EST
From:         George Keith <ST202064@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Compuserve

Thanks for all the help!  I managed to get through to my friend at compuserve.

--George Keith
st202064@brownvm.brown.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mailer: Elm [revision: 66.25]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 12:01:09 MET
From:         VERBERCK@BANRUC60.BITNET
Subject:      Re: oak vga driver wanted for Windows 3.1

>
> I recently received my new computer.  OAK VGA on board,
> (HED-627AX) With it came a set of disks containing amongst
> others drivers for Windows 3.0 high res. screen.
> I am using Windows 3.1 This is the origin of my question:
> I cannot get my computer to operate in Win 800*600 mode,
> because during installation of the driver the VGAColor.GR2
> file cannot be found on my Windows 3.1 disks.
>
> Koos Jorritsma
> JORRITSMA@LPT.TEM.NHL.NL
>

The Windows 3.1 drivers for the OAK VGA 067 card can be found on
cica (ftp.cica.indiana.edu) in /pub/pc/win3/drivers/video as
67_win31.zip.
They work fine for me in 640x480x256, 800x600x16 or 800x600x256.

Hopes this helpes.

******************************************************************************
*  Filip Verberckmoes                  Bitnet  : verberck@banruc60           *
*  Department of Chemistry             Rucanet : verberck@maze               *
*  University of Antwerp (RUCA)                                              *
*  Groenenborgerlaan 171                                                     *
*  B-2020 Antwerp                      FAX : + 32.3.218.02.33                *
*  BELGIUM                                                                   *
******************************************************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 11:49:00 EDT
From:         4_FSALEEM@FAIR1.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Looking for a good scanner.

I would highly suggest the Logitech Scanman 256. It's amazing what
a difference a grey-scaled picture will make. The resolution is not
as important because it is dependant on your output device. Ie, if
all you are going to print on is a dot matrix or laser printer (300
dpi) and not on a linotype or other professional typesetter, than
most scanners will have more than enough resolution.

FS!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU