HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dtgordon@unix1.tcd.ie (Damian Gordon)
Subject: Re: Actors' Other Roles [1/1]
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 14:05:02 GMT

In <rccarm00.715440319@mik.uky.edu> rccarm00@mik.uky.edu (ron c carman) writes:


>                       Star Trek Actors' Other Roles             Edition 1
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------




>Denise Crosby
>-----------------
>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation.
>Pictures:    (None Known).
Pet Cemetery (sp?).

>John de Lancie
>-----------------
>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation.
>Pictures:    The Fisher King; Taking Care of Business
The Hand that Rocks the Cradle

>James Doohan
>-----------------
>Television:  Ben Casey; Bewitched; Bonanza; Fantasy Island; 
>  	     The Fugitive; Gunsmoke; Hazel; Marcus Welby, M.D.; 
>	     Peyton Place; The Virginian.
Knight Rider 2000


>Michael Dorn
>-----------------
>Television:  CHiPs; Star Trek: The Next Generation.
>Pictures:    Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.
The Jagged Edge

>Jonathon Frakes
>-----------------
>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation.
North & South


>Colm Meaney
>-----------------
>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation.
>Pictures:    Far and Away.
Wasn't he in "The Field" ?

>Diana Muldaur
>-----------------
>Television:  L.A. Law; Star Trek; Star Trek: The Next Generation.
The Hulk


>Leonard Nimoy
>-----------------
>Television:  The Alpha Caper; Assault on the Wayne; Baffled; 
>	     In Search Of... (host); Marco Polo; The Missing Are Deadly;
>	     Mission Impossible; Star Trek; The Sun Also Rises;
>	     A Woman Called Golda.
Star Trek : The Next Gen., The Man from Uncle.


>William Shatner
>-----------------
>Television:  Andersonville Trial; The Baby Sitter; The Bastard; 
>	     Broken Angel; Disaster on the Coastliner; 
>	     North Beach and Rawhide; Rescue: 911 (host); 
>	     Secrets of a Married Man; Star Trek; 
>	     The Statesman; Top Flight (host); T.J. Hooker; 
>	     Voice of the Planet.
The Defenders(In the pilot, and as a guest star)

>Marina Sirtis
>-----------------
>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation. 
The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes ( The Six Napolens)


>Brent Spiner
>-----------------
>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation. 
Cheers, Tales from the Darkside.


>Patrick Stewart
>-----------------
>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation.
>Pictures:    The Doctor and the Devils; Dune.
Lifeforce, Excaliber, Lady Jane

>Wil Wheaton
>-----------------
>Television:  The Defiant Ones; A Long Way Home (debut); Long Time Gone;
>	     The Man Who Fell to Earth; My Dad Can't Be Crazy, Can He?;
>	     The Shooting; Star Trek: The Next Generation; 
>	     13 Thirteenth Avenue.
>Pictures:    The Buddy System (debut, 1984); The Curse; 
>	     Hambone and Hillie; The Last Starfighter; Stand by Me.
Young Harry Houdni.
From: v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Patrick Stewart's one man "Christmas Carol"?
Summary: Anyone know when in New York?
Date: 27 Aug 92 21:58:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <Btn9J7.4tz@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>, dp66@mc4adm.UWaterloo.ca (Kevin L. Oberle) writes...
>There was alot of discussion regarding Patrick Stewart's one man
>performance of "A Christmas Carol" last December, not to mention
>Tim Lynch's review.  I have heard mention that he may be taking
>the show to New York this coming winter.

>Can anyone out there confirm this yet?  If so, any idea as to
>where it will be showing?  And where might one obtain tickets
>(if not living in or near NY city?)

     Last winter's performance was on Broadway as well... I don't
     remember which theatre, but it was absolutely powerful, well
     worth seeing if at all possible...
     I did hear that Patrick will be returning to Broadway again
     this winter, but did I also hear something about him performing
     the show on the West End in London as well?  
     Either way, the answer to you questions can be obtained by phoning
     Creation Conventions, which produces Stewart's CHRISTMAS CAROL.
     Call 516-Showman to obtain their new phone number in North Hollywood...
     I do have the number in my book at home, but that's at home... sorry.
From: drucker@csa1.lbl.gov (ROBERT B DRUCKER)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Star Trek VI and the Neutral Zone
Date: 25 Aug 92 23:21:22 GMT
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: drucker@csa1.lbl.gov
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.196
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4   

   I am new to this group... I searched for previous discussions of 
this topic but could not see it.

   Star Trek VI (The Undiscovered Country) is about dealing with the
Klingon empire, which lives on the other side of the neutral zone.
Woah!  Isn't it the Romulans that live on the other side of the 
neutral zone?  In TOS the Klingons share our side of the galaxy
(albeit not very comfortably).

   What happened?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: jsbell@acs.ucalgary.ca (Joshua Bell)
Subject: Who's got the best beam-out?
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 16:01:16 GMT
Organization: The University of Calgary, Alberta

Hmmmm... Out of the Federation sparkle, Q flash, Ferengi swirl,
(is it just me or does this sound like an order placed in
10-Forward?), Borg tracer-fade, and anything else we've seen,
what do people like the best?

Joshua (doing his part to waste bandwidth)
+      "Each woman is a promise that she can't keep that appeals to           +
|  a hope you can't control." - joe theseus, Deadface: Earth Water Air Fire   |
|                                                                             |
+ jsbell@acs.ucalgary.ca   Academic Computing Services, University of Calgary +


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: djredick@bluemoon.rn.com (Darrin J. Redick)
Subject: Star Trek VI: The Revised UC
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[024])
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 92 10:10:15 EDT

I know that the video is a few weeks old, but I just now have the time
to post about it.

It seems to me that the new footage fleshes the story out a bit more,
ie, gives it more clarity in some spots.  I just wish they would have
included the scene that was shown during the 25th anniversary show showing 
Scotty saying "She canna take much more of this!"

As it is, though, I like it.  Does anybody know how much the VHS tape is?
I snagged a copy from PPV for $4.25, but would like to know about the 
tape, due to the better sound quality.


  _______________________________________________________________________
 |                                                                       |
 | Internet: djredick@bluemoon.rn.com                                    |
 |_______________________________________________________________________|
 |                                                                       |
 | FutureNet : #129@#02 #021@#03  #041@#05  #011@#08  #032@#09  #001#@10 |
 |             #041@#14 #067@#15  #131@#16  #043@#19  #126@#22  #247@#25 |
 |_______________________________________________________________________|
 |                                                                       |
From: KELSEY@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (KELSEY, Michael H.)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: dead languages
Date: 4 Sep 92 16:42:43 GMT
 <1992Sep4.070154.14974@nntp.uoregon.edu>
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

In article <1992Sep4.070154.14974@nntp.uoregon.edu>, eisimps@cie.uoregon.edu
(Eileen Simpson) says:
>
>In article <183ajrINN852@agate.berkeley.edu> jacob@plasma2.ssl.berkeley.edu
>(Jamey Jacob) writes:
>>My memory on this is vague, but does anyone remember an episode
>>where a 20th century language was used that nobody knew, and the
>>Data or someone remarked that it was an old language that died
>>out in the 21st century or so.  It was something common like
>>German or Spanish.  What language was it and what episode?
>
>The language was French, and Data's remark was made to Picard (Riker told
>him to drop it).  As I recall it was the episode where Yar was kidnapped
>and had to fight another woman.  Can't remember the name of the show.

"Code of Honor."  See page 7 of the Start Trek: The Next Generation
Program Guide, Brown & Lynch, ed., Mr. Video Productions (1992).

                                        -- Mike Kelsey
[  My opinions are not endorsed by SLAC, Caltech, or the US government  ]
What is your _name_?    "kelsey@slacvm.slac.stanford.edu"
What is your _quest_?   "To get a Ph.D. in high-energy physics"
When will you _finish_? "I don't know.   Waaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh..."
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Worst TNG episodes (was Re: Justice)
Date: 25 Aug 92 20:11:00 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Aug25.172731.9757@cs.wisc.edu> rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu writes:
>In <5018@arccs1.fed.FRB.GOV> m1kew02@fed.frb.gov (Kirstin E. Wells) writes:
>>Just saw a very **goofy** old episode "justice" where the crew beam down to 
>>a planet, a proverbial Eden, where all are happy and wear short shorts and
>>love to make love.  But the happiness is ruined when Boy Wonder steps on a 
>>forbidden flower bed and is condemned to death.  The acting was HORRID
>>(except for Stewart), complete with fake crying from Bev and "babbling" from
>>Data.  Riker, of course, loved the planet.  I had forgotten how much better
>>the new episodes are.  Bring on the new season!
>
>Well, "Justice" is a particularly rancid TNG episode, but it has plenty
>of competition even from the more recent seasons.  "Qpid", for instance, stands
>in my mind as the most vile Star Trek story ever broadcast.  And season five
>gave us a host of Alexander stories, all of which sucked eggs.

"Qpid" the most vile?  I think you're overlooking "Imaginary Friend" (which,
probably not coincidentally, had Alexander in it).  Truly, the absolute,
god-awfulest ST episode EVER.  Bad plot, bad acting, bad for us!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek
From: ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin)
Subject: Re: Stardates--from the horse's mouth
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 14:47:24 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.054628.2917@nntp.uoregon.edu> eisimps@cie.uoregon.edu (Eileen Simpson) writes:



If the 4 in the stardates stands for 24th century, tehn what happens
when ST:TNG gets to Season 10? (If that happens), and if not ST:TNG,
ST:Ds9 then.


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: lightnin@wpi.WPI.EDU (Paraaaaaaaaade of Shoooooooooes)
Subject: Re: Prime Directive
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Organization: DeityCo: Major and Minor Deities Placement Agency
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 09:35:27 GMT

>>>>> On 27 Aug 92 01:29:54 GMT, shimkevi@buchmf.bu.edu (Sergey Shimkevich) said:

SS> I always wondered how the Federation enforces the Prime Directive.
SS> The show makes it perfectly clear that there are numerous
SS> privately owned warp-capable ships besides the Starfleet ones. I
SS> can't see how the Federation can prevent even its own citizens
SS> from meddling with developing civilizations, unless: a) it has a
SS> military satellite in orbit around every such world or b) it is
SS> being extremely hypocritical or c) the script writers haven't
SS> thought out the details when they put in the Prime Directive.

Well, I've always looked at it this way.

The Prime Directive is the motivating factor for Starfleet.  So, any
Starfleet ships cannot interfere with a less advanced culture.  (It's
been implied that the same goes for more advanced cultures too).  In
any case, while the Feds would like everyone to obey this law, they 
can't force it.  That would be violating the Prime Directive on their
own culture, as well as limiting civil rights.  

So, it's not really a violation of the Directive, if Harry Mudd interferes,
only if Kirk does.

So, how do they explain the number of times Jamie's done it and gotten away
with it?

-lightnin

    /| Lightning: (n) A Force of Nature consisting of an electric discharge.
   / |_Virtual Enterprises, GmbH: Bureaucracy Inaction! 
  /_  /=======================================================================
   / / |Up the long ladder, and down the short rope,       |Email: 
  / /_ |to Hell with King Billy, and God bless the Pope,   |lightnin
 /_  / |if that doesn't do, we'll tear him in two,         |@wpi.wpi.edu
  / /  |and send him to Hell with his red, white, and blue.|__________________
 / /   |                                    -Traditional Irish Children's Song
/ /===========================================================================
|/ "Dark is not one of my favorite colors." -Ralph, the All Purpose Animal.


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch)
Subject: Re: Worf's moral dilemma
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 20:34:17 GMT

TheMadDoctor@cup.portal.com (Shane Derek Killian) writes:

[discussing "The Enemy" and Worf's refusal to help the dying Romulan]

>>I'm not sure why you see this as contrary to the way Worf thinks.  He is
>>often written as driven by the concept of honor.  Honor may seem difficult
>>at times to comprehend.  Worf refused to directly save an enemy and
>>the captain recognized that Worf had every right to determine what to do
>>with his body.  If "blood" has an important meaning to Worf (and it may
>>considering the Klingon feelings regarding families), then his refusal
>>to give it to an enemy that he has a deep hatred for makes sense.

>Remember, too, that the feelings went both ways. The Romulan said he
>would rather die than pullute his body with "Klingon filth."

Yep.  In fact, this set up a nice solution to the problem that I'm almost
surprised they didn't go with.

If the Romulan felt that polluting himself with "Klingon filth" would be a
fate worse than death, you'd think that might provide a little motivation
for Worf to actually go ahead and *donate* the tissue.  The idea of having
this enemy actually owe his life to someone he hates, and *knowing* that
he owes his life to that, might appeal to him.

Oh, well.  It worked the way they did it, too.  :-)

Tim Lynch
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: jsbell@acs.ucalgary.ca (Joshua Bell)
Subject: Re: Planet Earth
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 92 19:57:12 GMT
Organization: The University of Calgary, Alberta

In article <92Aug23.194723.26559@acs.ucalgary.ca> I wrote:
>While lounging around on Sunday afternoon, TBS showed 'Planet
>Earth' - a 1974 movie (failed pilot?) written/produced by Gene
>Roddenberry.
>
>Spooky stuff:
[trekisms nuked]

Add a young amazon warrior, played by Diana Muldaur.

*shudder*

One of the leaders of the tech society is Jonathan Conner. Okay,
not a trekism.... :)

Joshua
   _  _      "Thats a good idea!"  "I have those every once in a while."
 -(_)(_)-      "Why do you listen to me when I'm wrong?!?"
 \      /          - Dr. Goldfoot and the Bikini Machine
  |  . |      
  -____-      jsbell@acs.ucalgary.ca 
 /  \/  \     Academic Computing Services, University of Calgary 
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.misc:8712 rec.arts.startrek.tech:4734
From: TheMadDoctor@cup.portal.com (Shane Derek Killian)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Who's got the best beam-out?
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 16:59:27 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <1992Aug29.014932.2355@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>

>In article <92Aug28.160116.20645@acs.ucalgary.ca> jsbell@acs.ucalgary.ca (Josh
u
>a Bell) writes:
>>Hmmmm... Out of the Federation sparkle, Q flash, Ferengi swirl,
>>(is it just me or does this sound like an order placed in
>
>Trek should use a beam-out sometime similar to the ones on Blake's 7
>I think.  Beam-up was very cool, the person faded into an outline, and
>then the outline exploded into the rapidly expanding outline of a circle
>that shoots off into infinity.  Going down from the ship looked very
>painful, as though the person's image were being sent through an
>oscilloscope or a bad 50s TV set!
>
I *love* the outline teleport effect on B7. (The ones in the teleport
chamber or the ones on the Scorpio weren't that good.) But have you ever
noticed how much this looks like the leap-in/out effect in Quantum Leap?


TheMadDoctor@cup.portal.com
"I plan to live forever. (Or die trying.)" --Vila Restal
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: mcgead@operators.its.rpi.edu (Darren McGeary)
Subject: Re: Hallmark 1991 Enterprise Ornament
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 21:28:04 GMT

In article <1992Aug25.165043.5077@gw.wmich.edu> adamsf@gw.wmich.edu writes:
>In article <2302@devnull.mpd.tandem.com>, mwiz@mpd.tandem.com (Marc Wiz) writes:
>> In article <1992Aug24.175738.22276@berlioz.nsc.com> walter@nsc.nsc.com (Walter K. Hurwitz) writes:
>>>>First of all, don't get too excited, I have an extra one but am probably
>>>>unwilling to sell it.  I have noticed a few people who seem pretty desperate
>>>>for one and I am just testing the waters to see what the going price is these
>>>>days.  So, for all of you who want one, what would you be willing to pay?
>>>
>>>I think that the going price is around $100.00 USD.  I've heard it go as low as $95.00
>>>
>> 
>> At the Creation Con that was held in Austin a few weeks ago a dealer
>> claimed they were selling at a San Diego convention for $140 U.S.
>> 
>> When my wife and I went to a Hallmark store in Austin to pick up
>> our ornament I mentioned the $140 figure and was told that in some
>> circles (I believe non-fandom) the going price was $200!
>> 
>> Marc
>> -- 
>My Hallmark manager told me basically the same thing.  

  Are we talking about the shuttlecraft ornament that Hallmark is selling
now?  My wife just got one for me for listed price which was $24.
Or is there an older one that you guys are talking about?

-- 
Darren McGeary -  mcgead@rpi.edu          Freedom of religion means freedom 
PRO-CHOICE - THE AMERICAN WAY             FROM religion!!
Banish religion from government!          -These are my opinions. They just
Atheists Unite!!                           happen to also be the right ones.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: woodcock@crchh427.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Gregg Woodcock)
Subject: Shatner & Nimoy to be on Arsenio this week
Reply-To: woodcock@sdf.lonestar.org
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Richardson, Tx
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 20:47:01 GMT

This is a public service announcement.  According to a commercial I saw
last night, Shatner and Nimoy will appear on arsenio this week.

P.S. Has anybody seen the Hallmark commercial with Nimoy?  I've heard it is
quite humorous.
-- 
THANX...Gregg   woodcock@sdf.lonestar.org   bn202@cleveland.freenet.edu
ESN 444   day 214.684.7380   night 214.530.2495   *I buy used Vectrex stuff!*
From: sll28@cc.usu.edu (Lorna Payne)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Actors' Other Roles [1/1]
Date: 2 Sep 92 16:46:22 GMT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <dtgordon.715442702@unix1.tcd.ie>, dtgordon@unix1.tcd.ie (Damian Gordon) writes:
> In <rccarm00.715440319@mik.uky.edu> rccarm00@mik.uky.edu (ron c carman) writes:
> 
> 
>>                       Star Trek Actors' Other Roles             Edition 1
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>Denise Crosby
>>-----------------
>>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation.
>>Pictures:    (None Known).
> Pet Cemetery (sp?).
 Pet Semetery

> 
>>John de Lancie
>>-----------------
>>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation, MacGyver
>>Pictures:    The Fisher King; Taking Care of Business
> The Hand that Rocks the Cradle

> 
>>Leonard Nimoy
>>-----------------
>>Television:  The Alpha Caper; Assault on the Wayne; Baffled; 
>>	     In Search Of... (host); Marco Polo; The Missing Are Deadly;
>>	     Mission Impossible; Star Trek; The Sun Also Rises;
>>	     A Woman Called Golda.
	Outer Limits

> Star Trek : The Next Gen., The Man from Uncle.
> 
> 
>>William Shatner
>>-----------------
>>Television:  Andersonville Trial; The Baby Sitter; The Bastard; 
>>	     Broken Angel; Disaster on the Coastliner; 
>>	     North Beach and Rawhide; Rescue: 911 (host); 
>>	     Secrets of a Married Man; Star Trek; 
>>	     The Statesman; Top Flight (host); T.J. Hooker; 
>>	     Voice of the Planet.
> The Defenders(In the pilot, and as a guest star)
	Twilight Zone (Terror at 20,000 feet)
	Outer Limits, Man from UNCLE 

>>Brent Spiner
>>-----------------
>>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation. 
> Cheers, Tales from the Darkside.
	The Dain Curse
Theater:  Sunday in the Park With George (also seen on PBS)

> 
> 
>>Patrick Stewart
>>-----------------
>>Television:  Star Trek: The Next Generation;  
	I, Claudius;  Hamlet
>>Pictures:    The Doctor and the Devils; Dune.
> Lifeforce, Excaliber, Lady Jane

-- 

     -------------------------------------------------------------
               Lorna Payne
               Certified Math Geek and Grammarian
     -------------------------------------------------------------
     The concept is simply staggering.  Pointless, but staggering.
                         -The Doctor (The Pirate Planet)
     -------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: Bucky.Whaley@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Bucky Whaley)
Subject: Re: rec.arts.startrek.info Gone??
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 02:22:17 GMT

In article <92243.184537WITHC@CUNYVM.BITNET> <WITHC@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:
>I was wondering, did rec.arts.startrek.info gone inactive??  It disappeared
>from the newsgroup listing


Jim Griffith, r.a.s.i's moderator, posted on 8/10/92 that he would be on
vacation 8/22 - 9/7.  Probably your newsreader doesn't list a group in 
which all the current articles have expired.

--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
From: carter@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Carter Bennett)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Prime Directive
Date: 28 Aug 92 15:17:22 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <94681@bu.edu> shimkevi@buchmf.bu.edu (Sergey Shimkevich) writes:
>I always wondered how the Federation enforces the Prime Directive. The show
>makes it perfectly clear that there are numerous privately owned warp-capable
>ships besides the Starfleet ones. I can't see how the Federation can prevent
>even its own citizens from meddling with developing civilizations, unless: a)
>[some stuff deleted]

Please bear in mind that the Prime Directive is a Starfleet directive.
If you will recall, Riley and his followers who had settled on Angel 1 
were not with Starfleet, and (Data makes the comment most pointedly) not 
bound by the prime directive.

Point being, if the private sector makes contact and interacts with an
alien world, Starfleet does nothing about it.  If they did, there would
be no contact between the Federation and the rest of the galaxy.  The Prime
Directive is largely to prevent a "military" presence from imposing it's
will on alien worlds - as Kirk was so fond of doing.

If there was ever a reason for the Prime Directive, Kirk is it.

Carter R. Bennett, Jr. - Scientist      No matter where you go...
carter@scilab.lonestar.org                 .../dev/tty!
KI5SR