HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mlewis@cssnet.wplace.UUCP (Mark Lewis)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Date: 14 Oct 92 16:29:57 GMT
Organization: The Waffle House, Waldo's Place USA


dalew@twiki.PDX.COM (Dale Weber) writes:

> dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz writes:
> > I was under the impression that alt.bbs.waffle had been rmgrouped about
> > 3 months ago, however I've started receiving messages intended for that
> > group in my junk file over the last few days.
>   It wasn't actually regrouped at all.  Another group was formed, and that
> is comp.bbs.waffle.  They are separate and I don't currently carry the
> comp.bbs.waffle group here because of all the duplication there no doubt is
> and will continue to be for sometime.

duplications???? what duplications?? i only see 4 or 5 "duplicates" a
month if that... the only time any duplicates come in are when they are
written in alt.bbs.waffle and comp.bbs.waffle.... if everyone would just
start using comp.bbs.waffle then there would be NO duplicates -=B-)
right?? since the "mainstream" waffler's HAVE moved all discussion to
comp.bbs.waffle, it seems to me that c.b.w is the place to
be<<GRIN>>....

> > Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried?
>   Nope.  It's alive and well here and can stay right where it is as far as
> I am concerned.

this is why there is this duplicate "problem" you mentioned above... see
above for "duplicate" reply to this part, hehehe...

> > I assumed it was, as comp.bbs.waffle is very much alive and kicking.
>   You know what they say about assumtions... ;-) ;-)

no comment<BIG SMILE>...

BTW: it might resemble a "small" FLAME but this post is in NO WAY a 
FLAME on anyone or to anyone

)\/(ark


<---------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 Mark Lewis           * DA-CON Consultants -- Creating Solutions since 1985 *
 FIFESNet 20:0/0                 mlewis%wplace%kelly@wolves.durham.nc.us UUCP
 FIDONet  1:3634/12                           mlewis@lee.fred.cerf.net USENet
 USENet->FIDONet Mark.Lewis@f12.n3634.z1.fidonet.org    wplace!mlewis CSS-Net
                   The Company is mine... The Words are mine...
                    The Thoughts are mine... The System is mine...
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4739 comp.bbs.waffle:3169 alt.config:6190
From: Bob Van Cleef <revc@Garg.Campbell.CA.US>
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 09:54:42 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Land of Garg

dalew@twiki.PDX.COM (Dale Weber) writes:

> dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz writes:
> 
> > I was under the impression that alt.bbs.waffle had been rmgrouped about
> > 3 months ago, however I've started receiving messages intended for that
> > group in my junk file over the last few days.
> 
>   It wasn't actually regrouped at all.  Another group was formed, and that
> is comp.bbs.waffle.  They are separate and I don't currently carry the
> comp.bbs.waffle group here because of all the duplication there no doubt is
> and will continue to be for sometime.

Dale;

I would hate to disappoint you. However, after reading both alt.bbs.waffle
and comp.bbs.waffle for awhile, I stopped reading alt.bbs.waffle as it 
was duplicated in comp.bbs.waffle. However, there is a lot of traffic in
comp.bbs.waffle that never makes it to the alt. group.

I would humbly suggest that you may be carrying the wrong one of the two.

Bob

><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>     \|/     <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><
Bob Van Cleef                    -0-        revc@garg.Campbell.CA.US
The Land of Garg BBS             /|\               BBS (408) 378-5108
><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>      |      <><  <><  <><  <><  <><  <><
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
From: fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner)
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 03:36:54 GMT

In article <kgyHsB1w165w@twiki.PDX.COM> dalew@twiki.PDX.COM (Dale Weber) writes:
|  It wasn't actually regrouped at all.  Another group was formed, and that
|is comp.bbs.waffle.  They are separate and I don't currently carry the
|comp.bbs.waffle group here because of all the duplication there no doubt is
|and will continue to be for sometime.

Are you sure that someone up the line from you isn't aliasing comp.bbs.waffle
to alt.bbs.waffle?  On psuvax1, there have been 20 articles in alt.bbs.waffle
in the last 10 days, most of which are talking about whether or not
alt.bbs.waffle is dead.  There are 351 articles in comp.bbs.waffle over that
same 10-day time period.

If you're posting to alt.bbs.waffle, you're doing yourself a disservice; lots
less people read alt.bbs.waffle than comp.bbs.waffle .  comp.bbs.waffle
got 68% distribution in September's USENET readership report, as opposed to
54% for alt.bbs.waffle.

|> Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried?
|
|  Nope.  It's alive and well here and can stay right where it is as far as
|I am concerned.

Why not alias it to vox.waffle, Dale?  Then you can hang onto even *earlier*
history.

alt.bbs.waffle is essentially dead.  If you want to hold on to it for your
own reasons, go ahead, but don't try to get other people to.

  Bill
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4729 comp.bbs.waffle:3080 alt.config:6132
From: freitag@elrond.toppoint.de (Claus Schoenleber)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 92 10:22:55 MESZ
Distribution: world
Organization: Claus Schoenleber, Kiel, Germany (3-926986)

moon!cyberden!system@well.sf.ca.us writes:

> dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz writes:
> 
> > Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried?
> 
> Yes.
> 

R.I.P.

-- --------------------------------------------------------------
Claus Schoenleber             I  UUCP    freitag@tpki.toppoint.de
=================================================================
The Galaxy shall miss you! I "What's the matter?" - "Never mind!"
Isaac Asimov died 06Apr92. I  ;-)  "What's mind?" - "No matter!"
=================================================================
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
From: kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan)
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Organization: The Rhode Island Internet Systems Cooperative Network
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 21:11:08 GMT

elle@kimbark.uchicago.edu (Ellen Keyne Seebacher) writes:

>I beg your pardon:  I run a C News site, and the previous admin had the
>brains to turn off automatic rmgrouping years ago -- about the time of
>"talk.ketchup", "misc.sheep", and "alt.sex.aluminum.baseball.bat".

C-News by default honors newgroups, and mails rmgroups to the news
administrator.

So, you previous site admin didn't "have the brains to turn off automatic
rmgrouping years ago", c-news as supplies automatically does that anyway.

MD
-- 
--  Michael P. Deignan                      / Sex is hereditary. If your 
--  Domain: mpd@anomaly.sbs.com            /  parents never had it, chances 
--    UUCP: ...!uunet!rayssd!anomaly!mpd  /   are you won't either...
-- Telebit: +1 401 455 0347              /
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4727 comp.bbs.waffle:3013 alt.config:6099
From: a-dent@somenode.uucp (Bryan Hannahs)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 92 01:14:23 EDT
Organization: .sdrawkcaB sgnihT gnipyT roF yteicoS ehT

kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan) writes:

> a-dent@somenode.uucp (Bryan Hannahs) writes:
> 
> >A few days after the rmgroup, someone sent a newgroup alt.bbs.waffle.
> >Most of us just ignore it.
> 
> Unfortunately, sites running C-News will automatically create it.

Yeah, but just cause it's there doesn't mean you can't ignore it...

> More than likely the culprit was Bruce Becker. The simple solution to
> bypassing a Becker-autonewgroup is to add the line:

Yeah, but I'm still waiting for an
rmgroup alt.stupid.putz.bruce.becker.die.die.die       :-)

---
"Man created God in his own image." - Lazarus Long

Bryan Hannahs      |   a-dent@somenode.uucp    a-dent@bluemoon.use.com
(aka Arthur Dent)  |               bryan@bluemoon.use.com
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
From: elle@kimbark.uchicago.edu (Ellen Keyne Seebacher)
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Reply-To: elle@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 17:12:37 GMT

kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan) writes:
>>A few days after the rmgroup, someone sent a newgroup alt.bbs.waffle.
>
>Unfortunately, sites running C-News will automatically create it.

I beg your pardon:  I run a C News site, and the previous admin had the
brains to turn off automatic newgrouping years ago -- about the time of
"talk.ketchup", "misc.sheep", and "alt.sex.aluminum.baseball.bat".

Change that to "sites running C News whose admins don't give a @$%&..."

--
Ellen Keyne Seebacher              news@uchinews.uchicago.edu
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4730 comp.bbs.waffle:3150 alt.config:6178
From: dalew@twiki.PDX.COM (Dale Weber)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 92 13:22:43 PDT
Organization: Wafflemania Unlimited - Portland, OR USA

dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz writes:

> I was under the impression that alt.bbs.waffle had been rmgrouped about
> 3 months ago, however I've started receiving messages intended for that
> group in my junk file over the last few days.

  It wasn't actually regrouped at all.  Another group was formed, and that
is comp.bbs.waffle.  They are separate and I don't currently carry the
comp.bbs.waffle group here because of all the duplication there no doubt is
and will continue to be for sometime.

> Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried?

  Nope.  It's alive and well here and can stay right where it is as far as
I am concerned.

> I assumed it was, as comp.bbs.waffle is very much alive and kicking.

  You know what they say about assumtions... ;-) ;-)

--
Internet: dalew@pdx.com  (Waffle Beta Site)             P r a i s e   t h e
Home BBS: +1(503)335-9600 at 2400 - 9600 Bps [v.32bis]        L o r d !
    WORK: Northwest Analytical, Inc. - Home of:              
          Voice +1 (503) 224-7727          NWA Quality Analyst and NWA LIMS
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: sjsobol@wariat.org (Steven J. Sobol)
Subject: Re: 216 Internet ?
Organization: The Tiny Software Co., via APK Public Access Unix, Cleveland
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 04:47:28 GMT

jerodh@Condor.mcs.kent.edu (Jerod Husvar) writes:
>In article <XT1FsB3w165w@infopls.chi.il.us> damir@infopls.chi.il.us (Damir Matanic) writes:
>>Does anyone know of any BBSs in the 216 Cleveland area that offers 
>>Internet mail and Usenet?  I don't need full Internet access.
>>Thanks ahead of time.
>>
>>--
>>damir@infopls.chi.il.us (Damir Matanic)
>>Infoplus BBS, +1 708 537 0247, v32bis. Home of Infoplus.
>
>Cleveland FreeNET, (216)368-3888.

oh yeah, forgot the Freenets! The other 216-areacode Freenets are
Medina and Lorain County. You can obtain the numbers by logging on to
CFN as a guest and typing 'go terminal.tower', choosing 'other FreeNet/NPTN
systems' and choosing the phone number list.

(unfortunately, I don't have the phone #'s handy.)

-- 
Steve Sobol     (IRC: RockNRoll)           sjsobol@tiny.com, sjsobol@wariat.org
President, The Tiny Software Co.                    ag510@cleveland.freenet.edu
Coordinator, Unix SIG, Greater Cleve. PC User Group        23707 Glenhill Drive
Founder, Midwest Regional COHERENT User Group        Cleveland, OH 44122    USA
From: kns@sactoh0.sac.ca.us (Kalib Sumter)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: BBS Program Questions
Keywords: HELP BBS SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING
Date: 9 Oct 92 09:08:20 GMT
Organization: Sacramento Public Access Unix

I am in the process of writing a BBS program for the MSDOS based family of
machines.  I want to have as much actual user input as possible in this
process.  
 
If there are any functions in BBS programs today, or maybe one that
doesn't exist yet, please sent me an E-Mail message and tell me what it
is.  I feel that there is a lot that most BBS programs lack.  What some
programs may offer, others don't.  I think that it is time that there is a
program that takes all of the good qualities of the existing programs and
merges them into one.  I mean, realisticly, this program can do anything
that I want it to do, as long as I take the time to write it.  
 
So again, if there are ideas that you have, please feel free to drop me a
line.  
 
I estimate that the first test version will be available in early 1993.  I
am going to release it into the public domain.  (Not shareware)  I will
also make the source code available.  Maybe I can start another
Citadel-like cult.   :)
 
Hasta
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-   Kalib Sumter       Internet: kns@sactoh0.sac.ca.us            -=
=-   The views expressed in the above message should probably      -=
=-   been kept to myself...                                        -=
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: grant@bluemoon.rn.com (Grant DeLorean)
Subject: Re: Stealing software (was: Re: Big Brother BBS policies)
Organization: Blue Moon
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 21:23:04 GMT

tim@alchemy.UUCP (Timothy M. Hood) writes:

>Your understanding of the relationship between wrong and illegal is flawed.  
>There are things which may be wrong which may not be illegal, but anything 
>illegal is wrong.  Illegal is a subset of wrong, not an intersection.  Like:

>+------------------------------------+
>|                                    |
>|              WRONG                 |
>|                                    |
>|     +------------------------+     |
>|     |        ILLEGAL         |     |
>|     +------------------------+     |
>|                                    |
>+------------------------------------+

 Your understanding of the concepts is flawed. They are only vaguely related.
There are many wrong things that are legal, and many illegal things which
are not wrong. Legality is determined by law, and law has nothing to do
with right and wrong.

 Not that I am defending piracy mind you... 

-- 
\   Grant DeLorean  - IHMSA & NRA Life Member -  (grant@bluemoon.use.com)   /

        Good leaders being scarce, following yourself is allowed.
From: bx791@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Alan Michael Gindlesperger)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: BBS program
Date: 9 Oct 1992 15:19:28 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc4.ins.cwru.edu


Well...I'm one of those guys who wants to start a BBS and...
is writing there OWN BBS software!!  It will be hard, but
fun.  So far I have the Logon part basically finished...it allows
new accounts...and checks for carrier drops.  Pretty good
so far..some mods and error corrections will be made
From: damir@infopls.chi.il.us (Damir Matanic)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: 216 Internet ?
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 14:18:44 CDT
Organization: INFOPLUS support, Wheeling, IL

Does anyone know of any BBSs in the 216 Cleveland area that offers 
Internet mail and Usenet?  I don't need full Internet access.
Thanks ahead of time.

--
damir@infopls.chi.il.us (Damir Matanic)
Infoplus BBS, +1 708 537 0247, v32bis. Home of Infoplus.
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: jdecarlo@mitre.org (John DeCarlo)
Subject: Re: Stealing software (was: Re: Big Brother BBS policies)
Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean  VA
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 11:38:24 GMT

In article <702@alchemy.UUCP> tim@alchemy.UUCP (Timothy M. Hood) writes:

>In article <118.11148@uonline.com> rjus@uonline.com (ren_just) writes:
>>dhesi@cirrus.com (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
>>: 
>>: There are good reasons why not everybody agrees that unauthorized copying
>>: is always wrong.  For example, I see nothing wrong with making three
>>: backup copies where a signed software license allows only two.

>Your understanding of the relationship between wrong and illegal is 
>flawed.  There are things which may be wrong which may not be illegal, but 
>anything illegal is wrong.  Illegal is a subset of wrong, not an 
>intersection.

Yow! Talk about someone with a flawed set of beliefs.  When freeing slaves 
is illegal, it is wrong?  (And magically becomes right when the law 
changes?).  Legal and illegal have pretty much zero to do with right and 
wrong.

When talking about intangibles, such as software, you have to understand 
where the possibility of theft might occur.  Obviously duplicating bits
isn't directly theft, any more than photocopying is.  So you aren't stealing 
diskettes or ones and zeros, but acquiring a copy in an unauthorized manner.
This is why there are copyright laws, to govern how copies can be 
authorized.  Unauthorized copying isn't the same thing as stealing to most 
people, since no one loses anything tangible.

Take your example of stealing a Ferrari because you can't afford one.  
Obviously an example of misunderstanding the situation.  OTOH, suppose 
you went and stole a Ferrari from your neighbor in such a way that she still 
had her Ferrari (now there are two Ferraris where there was just one before 
you stole hers),  now the situation would be analogous.  

The hard part in software duplication cases is proving any damages, which is 
why there is little profit except educational in prosecuting people who make 
just a few copies.

However, it is illegal to violate copyright laws, even if there is no hard 
evidence of theft involved.


John DeCarlo, MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA--My views are my own
Fidonet:  1:109/131  Internet:  jdecarlo@mitre.org
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: jhantin@unlv.edu (Jeffrey Hantin)
Subject: Message editors for XBBS
Originator: jhantin@mayall.cs.unlv.edu
Organization: UNLV
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 23:48:30 GMT

I am considering converting my BBS over to XBBS from Spitfire, but I
am having an exceptionally hard time finding message editor programs
for it!  I have found a couple of full screen editors, but for the
line editor bit, I don't want to run DOS "edlin" through Gateway2 (my
users would have a fit!).  The XBBS manual recommends LineEd for the
online message line editor.  However, I don't know what filename to
look for, and an "archie -s" doesn't really help much if I'm looking
for a two-character string!... Can someone point out a source for
these online editors (LineEd, QuickEd, and AnsiEd)?  As well as other
XBBS utilities (i.e. XST [the scanner tosser], XBASIC, XHMS [the XBBS
offline reader], HeadEdit [the sysop/point reader], etc.)  Any help
will be appreciated.

+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Jeffrey Hantin            | It takes several hundred nuts to hold a  |
| jhantin@unlv.edu          | car together, but only one to scatter it |
| jhantin@helios.nevada.edu | all over the landscape.                  |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: Best BBS system
Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745 
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 11:15:49 GMT

rdippold@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold) writes:

>>  o 64 message areas

>Glad to see you're still committed to including at least one lie about
>TBBS in every message you post on it.

It's not a lie.  Topic areas are not message areas.  Topic areas
do not support gated conferences.  It is not a lie -- TBBS supports
64 message areas.

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: bjpocock@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu (Beastor the Mad)
Subject: Solar Realms and High Speed Modems.
Organization: University of Waterloo
Distribution: alt
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 23:57:19 GMT

I have a high speed modem.  My port is locked at 19200 in RA.  USers who
are playing SRE are getting hanged so to speak.  I saw SRLOCK there, read
the useless bit of information, and decided I'd give it a try also.  I use
SRLOCK 19200 right after SRDOOR.  No good... users are no longer getting
hanged but the prompts are really slow.  Reading the manual I decided I'd
give the parameter /NOSPECIALEFFECTS after the SRE in the batch file.
Still no good.  Can someone give me some hints on how to set up SRE with
a high speed modem?

Thanx...

Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: dougnews@access.digex.com (Doug Humphrey)
Subject: Re: claim of modem eavesdropping by gov't
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 03:55:42 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.075426.272@v7.vitro.com> terrwm@v7.vitro.com writes:
>
>Your credit report is almost entirely composed of these 'strings of alpha-
>numerics'.  You pay TRW to interpret these codes and format a nice, pretty
>human readable report (electronic or otherwise).  
>
>Don't be so quick to criticize if you don't know all the facts!

Well, I have seen the record definitions for TRW CreditData; 
the internal record setups that the programmers use.  The 
strings that were quoted were nothing special as far as I can 
tell.  They were not meaningful data, or even in the right
format, for any of the fields in the database record that
existed as of a year or so ago.  There literally would be
no place in the database for those to exist, and thus be
associated with you.  I would post the definitions, but they
were delivered under non-disclosure and it would no
doubt be a real problem for many people (including me).

Doug Humphrey
Tandem Computers
Eastern Region Security Specialist
Organization: Central Michigan University
Date: Friday, 9 Oct 1992 00:28:22 EDT
From: <34RMSNE@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU>
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: 386BSD, Linux, docs etc.

aslkdjfa;sldkjf;asldkjfa;sldkjfa;sldkjf;asdlkjfa;sldkjf;asldkjf;asldkjf;aslkjf;
asldkjfa;ldkjfa;lkdjf;alkfj;alkjf;alkdjf;aldj
Xref: sparky alt.bbs:6487 alt.bbs.internet:3989 alt.bbs.lists:1315
From: havemann_l@spcvxb.spc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.internet,alt.bbs.lists
Subject: Re: Federal Information BBS's ON and OFF of internet.  ???
Date: 14 Oct 92 21:14:04 GMT
Organization: SPC Community Access System

In article <1992Oct6.214102.510@newstand.syr.edu>, acyoung@suneagle.syr.EDU (Aaron Craig Young) writes:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I am trying to find any and all ways to get federal information via
> phone or internet.  I am taking a class in US and Federal Information
> and have been told that many agencies are online.  I don't mind making
> a long distant data call.  Does anyone know of these numbers or how
> I can get them?  Whatever answers I find, I will post.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aaron

As somebody else mentioned, Matt Lesko's (excellent) database lists a number of 
Fed BBSs.  On CompuServe, the command is GO INFOUSA.  The same stuff is also on 
America Online, and is (IMHO) easier to find than CIS's clunky menu.


-- 

 Lee Havemann, Sys_op    HSH Associates          (201) 838-3330 
 Havemann_l@spcvxa.spc.edu      -      Havemann_l@spcvxa.bitnet
 "Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of anyone else, 
  including myself."
From: 9210008@sunvax.sun.ac.za (Conrad Christensen)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Best BBS system
Date: 13 Oct 92 20:07:54 GMT
Organization: University of Stellenbosch, RSA

What would the best BBS system be to start a BBS with : RA or QBBS ...

Thanks
Conrad
--
Some of today's contestants will die in household accidents after the show.
Newsgroups: alt.bbs