HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Christophe.Wolfhugel@grasp.insa-lyon.fr (Christophe Wolfhugel)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: system() and SIGCHLD
Date: 19 Aug 92 15:31:57 GMT
Organization: INSA Informatique, Lyon, France
NNTP-Posting-Host: grasp1.univ-lyon1.fr

In article <94029@bu.edu> tasos@cs.bu.edu (Anastasios Kotsikonas) writes:
>If process A forks B, then A does a system(), is A supposed to receive
>a SIGCLD when system() returns?
>
>All replies said no, and some people were astonished that AIX had this
>"problem" [really!]. 

I must say that on all boxes I have tried, yes, the system() generates
a SIGCHLD.  So the handlers have to be done in concordance with this
(life would be so easier sometimes without that).

-- 
Christophe Wolfhugel    |    Email: Christophe.Wolfhugel@univ-lyon1.fr
   "No keyboard, press F1 to continue"
From: pa@curly.appmag.com (Pierre Asselin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: reporting bugs (was: ptys and getpwnam())
Date: 17 Aug 92 15:41:22 GMT
Organization: Applied Magnetics, Goleta, CA

In <1992Aug14.212111.17526@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com> rahner@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com (Mark Rahner) writes:

>pa@curly.appmag.com (Pierre Asselin) writes:
>: 
>: Once again, my humble proposal for a band-aid:
>: 
>: 3) IBM:
>:   Allow your employees to file bug reports at their discretion
>:   for problems reported on Usenet.

>This is an excellent idea that is long overdue.  [...]

See?  what did I tell you.

What I mean is real bug reports, as opposed to second-class bug
reports.  It boils down to this:  assign a customer number to
comp.unix.aix and get it past the suits.  :)/2
-- 

--Pierre Asselin, Magnetoresistive Head Engineering, Applied Magnetics.
  pa@appmag.com        the usual disclaimers apply.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Subject: About that automounter patch...
Organization: MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 22:08:31 GMT


I didn't think I needed it, but, well, I do.

Could someone please send me the APAR #?

-- 
 \   Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu
 /\  White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: hubler@galaxy.lerc.nasa.gov (Dale Hubler)
Subject: Re: CSH and AIX
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 19:28:47 GMT

In article <1992Aug11.190001.19546@linus.mitre.org> chantal@mitre.org writes:
>We are currently just starting up on the IBM RS/6000 and having
>some difficulty with running csh under the AIX.  The
>
>  <bunch-o-stuff deleted>
>
>We simply type something and pipe it to a script which should
>cat it.
>
>i.e.
>
>% echo Wazoo | pipe_script
>[1] 13890 13891
>% jobs
>[1] + Done             echo Wazoo |
>      Background write pipe_script
>[1] + Done	       echo Wazoo |
>      Background write pipe_script
>
>Any help on this will be greatly appreciated. :-)
>
>
I don't have any solution for this other than using ksh either, but
for what it's worth we have the same behavior on the RS6000s here.
Just simple C-shell aliases will work fine one momemt and not the next.
We get the same background writes regularly.  I just haven't bothered
with this one because it is little more than an annoyance and I am
busy installing a number of other APARs.  If anybody has a solution
other than telling me to use some other shell please post to this group
or copy me on the E-mail.

Thanks


--
Dale A. Hubler  (216) 977-7014   hubler@lerc.nasa.gov
For each and every low-tech problem there exists a high-tech solution
From: tim@sabus.UUCP (Tim Brown)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: Getting sendmail to be MXer (AIX 3.2)
Date: 21 Aug 92 19:39:54 GMT
Organization: The SABUS Group

david@wal6000b.udc.upenn.edu (R. David Murray) writes:

>In article <1992Aug20.002257.9099@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>, mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) writes:
>> (This is not specific to AIX.  It should be in comp.unix.questions, or
>> a sendmail group if there is one.)
>>  <answer deleted>
>> But sendmail configurations vary so much that I cannot even tell you
>> approximately where you would want to put that.

>Well, the fact that they vary so much is why I posted to the AIX group and
>specified that it was the IBM distributed AIX 3.2 sendmail.cf!  I was hoping
>that somebody would know the answer off the top of the their head, but
>if no one does I'll find our local sendmail experts and get them to help
>me reconfigure the whole thing. 

I sympathize with you.  Seems much more direct to seek help on the
hardware platform in question.  I think that it is rude to tell
someone to post elsewhere when the subject matter overlaps even a
little bit.  It is not like he was asking how to play chess.










-- 
Tim Brown
The SABUS Group
2091 Cliffside Dr.		Anchorage, Alaska 99501
(907)277-4232			tim%sabus@uunet.uu.net
From: del+@CMU.EDU (Daniel Edward Lovinger)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Pulling .bff files apart w/o installp
Date: 13 Aug 92 11:22:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.AeWfNzC00WD5AexsZH
Organization: Software Development, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


	Due to some local contraints, I find it neccesary (or at least
it would be extremely helpful) to be able to manually apply AIX fixes
into a central image of a 3.2.x machine tree that we use as a central
OS image for remote updates. installp does not, as far as I can
discover, have any support for extracting the contents of these .bff
files and my walk through Info Explorer wasn't enligtening either ...

	Clues?


					dan
					cmu comp services
					del+@cmu.edu
Xref: sparky comp.unix.aix:8917 bit.listserv.power-l:256
From: IMAGING.CLUB@OFFICE.WANG.COM ("Imaging Club")
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,bit.listserv.power-l
Subject: Wang document-imaging strategy interview, RS/6000
Date: 19 Aug 92 17:21:07 GMT
Organization: Mail to News Gateway at Wang Labs

If anyone would like a copy of that Advanced Imaging interview
this month with Wang Marketing VP David Goulden on the Wang
document-imaging strategy, please let me know.  (Wang provides
RS/6000-based OPEN document imaging solutions, both with and without
jukeboxes.)

----------------------Michael.Willett@OFFICE.Wang.com-------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: marc@watson.ibm.com (Marc Auslander)
Subject: Re: Building shared libraries
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 20:20:53 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, New York

The ld entry in info contains a paragraph titled:

Imports/Exports File Format
which is what you need.

The format is:

lines starting with * are comments
lines staring with # are control lines

valid entries are lines of the form:

symbol [syscall]

Each such line causes the symbol named to be exported.  syscall marks
the symbol as a "system call".  This only matters if the module is
intented as a kernel extension, in which case symbol will be user callable.

There is no built in facility for exporting all symbols - an exports
list must be built.  One way is to do an ld, post process its map or
an nm or dump to construct the list.
--


Marc Auslander       (IBM)<marc@marc.watson.ibm.com>      914 784-6699
                     (Internet)<marc@watson.ibm.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: hc03@rexago8.uucp (Leif Fellague)
Subject: SVR3 to AIX porting
Summary: What can a SVR3 user expect when porting apps to AIX?
Keywords: SVR3 AIX porting compatibility standards compliance
Organization: Summit Information Systems
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 19:53:58 GMT

We have been writing in-house applications for several years on AT&T 3B2 and
3B1 systems running, of course, SVR3 (SVR2-1/2 for 3B1, I guess).  For obvious
reasons we have to move to new technology, and we're evaluating several
options, one of which is the RS/6000.

In porting a sample suite of our applications, we encountered a number of
inconsistencies between SVR3 and AIX that we found troubling (join and od were
broken, we encountered warnings about sort -u being unreliable, etc.).  We care
about these things because we run mission critical business applications on
these systems, many of which depend on shell scripts that use more Un*x
commands than we have time to test individually.  IBM is offering a very
attractive package in a number of other areas, but we have concerns about AIX
functionality and SVR3 compatibility.  We'd really appreciate some help from
people in the community in deciding how valid our concerns are.

Our questions for folks who have experience porting their SVR3 apps to AIX:

What problems did you encounter in recompiling your C programs with AIX XL C
and linking in AIX libraries?

Have you experienced AIX utilities producing incorrect or unexpected output
when compared with their SVR3 equivalents?  Which utilities had these problems?
How severe were these problems?

Some of the problems we had were related to our use of dumb ASCII VDTs, which
AIX doesn't appear to support as well as graphics consoles and X terminals.
Have any other users of dumb VDTs experienced special problems with AIX
utilities or tools?

For service, how responsive has IBM been in fixing hardware problems?  Has
AIX support been good in resolving OS software issues?  Have patches been
offered promptly, and did those patches find their way into the next release?

. . . And just for SNA gurus:  we use our Un*x boxes to connect to an ES/9000
(heh, heh).  If we buy RS/6000s, we'll use IBM's SNA support package for AIX,
including 3270 emulation and LU6.2.  Have you either used or evaluated this
product?  Have you found it robust, easy to use, stable, etc.?

Thanks.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leif Fellague, Summit Info Sys, Akron,OH hc03%rexago8@uunet Standard disclaimer
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: richb@kronos.com (Rich Braun)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Directory "..":  No permission
Date: 19 Aug 92 22:34:58 GMT
Organization: Kronos Inc. / Waltham, MA
Disclaimer: This posting is a personal opinion and not that of Kronos Inc.

Ever since we had to reload our 3.1.5 AIX system from tape in June, and
even on our brand-new 3.2 system, I get the following error message if
I do an "ls -ld .." in the top-level directory of any mounted filesystem
other than "/" :

	..: No permission

This means, for example, the pwd command doesn't work.  Is this a bug
in AIX or something really wrong with the permissions?  If I cd into
the parent directory, I can see that the permissions are set to 777.
The error messages don't make sense.

This problem showed up only after a complete reinstall from a brand-new
IBM tape.  Previous to the crash necessitating this, we were running
3.1.5 without this problem.

-rich
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: jonms@watson.ibm.com ()
Subject: xcdb on aix 3.2
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 19:13:37 GMT
Reply-To: jonms@pi.watson.ibm.com ()
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

Has anyone else experienced problems using xcdb on AIX 3.2?
Executing:  xcdb foo  returns

xcdb: can't stat 'foo'
xcdb: no line table in xcdb() (recompile with  '-g' if you want to debug here)

I have compiled foo with -g

Jon
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: cary@jove.colorado.edu (John R. Cary)
Subject: Re: SUMMARY: NIS under AIX 3.2
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 23:41:32 GMT

In article <1992Aug18.115945.21987@dcatlas.dot.gov>, drewo@dcatlas.dot.gov (Andrew R. Orndorff) writes:              
|> 
|> 	One othe question I do have though - has anyone been able to get
|> NIS to work through a gateway?? For really idiotic reasons we have a couple
|> of our workstations on different subnets and they are unable to 'talk' to
|> the NIS servers - even when we try to set the server using the ypset 
|> command.

We got it to work.  Not sure all of what might be wrong, but the machine on the
subnet must be a slave server, not just a slave.  


-- 
--------------------------
John R. Cary                                  cary@boulder.colorado.edu
Department of Astrophysical, Planetary and Atmospheric Sciences
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0391
ph. (303) 492-1489                                   fax (303) 492-0642
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: rick@ransom.msc.cornell.edu (Rick Cochran)
Subject: Re: ptys and getpwnam()
Organization: Cornell Materials Science Center
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 19:10:37 GMT

In article <1992Aug9.185135.21404@awdprime.austin.ibm.com>, jfh@greenber.austin.ibm.com (John F Haugh II) writes:
|> In article <1251@curly.appmag.com> pa@curly.appmag.com (Pierre Asselin) writes:
|> >As things stand now, not fixing bugs because they haven't been
|> >"officially reported" is a useless charade.
|> 
|> No, it is NOT a useless charade . . .

A chance to get this off my chest!

One of the reasons why you will see horrendous bugs discussed on usenet
and not reported to the IBM "Defect Support Center" (who thought up that
name?!) is the absurd difficulty of submitting a simple piece of test
code to IBM.

Fact 1:  In about 100 calls, I have not found a single person at DSC who
was aware of the existance of the "aixserv" service for submitting PMR's
and supporting material via the internet.  You can certainly use it anyway
if you know about it, but if you don't, the DSC people won't know enough
to suggest it.

With the number of disgusting regression bugs, not to mention new
ones, in AIX 3.2, I simply cannot submit every one I find.

(AIX 3.2.2 plus the latest update tape ("U405614 and others") contain more
than 300 updates which each contain multiple "fixes".  I get to apply these
to 30 machines.  There isn't enough time in the world to even figure out
which of them I really need.)


Fact 2: The last time I submitted some supporting C code via
"aixserv", all the square and curly brackets got changed to blanks
(presumably by some EBCDIC translate table) and I had to spend an hour
on the phone telling somebody where to put them back.


JFH ought to try living in the real world.

Obviously not having a good week.
-Rick

-- 
|Rick Cochran		  607-255-7223		     rick@msc.cornell.edu|
|Cornell Materials Science Center		     rick@crnlmsc2.bitnet|
|E20 Clark Hall, Ithaca, N.Y. 14853	     cornell!msc.cornell.edu!rick|
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: borders@ms.uky.edu (Johnny Borders)
Subject: Re: Zmodem protocol on AIX ???
    <MARKE.92Aug16011050@fsi-ssd.csg.ssd.fsi.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 21:59:41 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

marke@fsi-ssd.csg.ssd.fsi.com (Mark W. Easter) writes:

>In article <1992Aug10.130401.1091@ccsun7.csie.nctu.edu.tw> gcp80532@csie.nctu.edu.tw (Chien-Lu Fang) writes:

>>        Would you please tell me where i can get the Zmodem utilities
>>  based on AIX 3.1 ???

>See "rzsz.tar.Z".  I got mine from uunet, and it works great.

*NOTHING* on AIX works "great." You're lucky if you can get it to work
at all. But I just *LOVE* IBM's er.. 'solutions' (see .sig :)
-- 
*******************************************************************************
* The University of Kentucky is not responsible * AIX: Marketing or lunacy?   *
* for me, by reason of "Bureaucrats Syndrome,"  * "I never used anything by   *
* a crippling form of insanity.                 *  IBM that I liked."         *
From: lubkt@synergy.CC.Lehigh.EDU (Binod Taterway)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: C routine realloc() seems broken in AIX 3.2.2...
Date: 17 Aug 92 16:37:28 GMT
Distribution: comp.unix.aix
Organization: Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA


FYI - 

AIX 3.2.2 has broken all my realloc() calls. The code that worked on
AIX 3.1.8 (and all previous releases) now gives core dump after I
upgraded AIX. I get -

	Catastrophe in realloc: invalid storage ptr
	IOT/Abort trap(coredump)

B.
--

- Binod Taterway                     
  Sr. User Consultant (LUCC)
  E-mail: bt00@Lehigh.EDU
From: steve@cahors (Steve.Hinde)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: INGRES under AIX
Keywords: INGRES
Date: 19 Aug 92 07:59:42 GMT
Organization: Bull S.A.

Dear INGRES Users,

I am looking for a version of INGRES to run on AIX, I would be grateful for 
any comments on the various versions available and their cost. I would
be particularly interested if anybody can tell me if the BSD INGRES port
is available under AIX, or any other public domain INGRES, and what level
of INGRES this would correspond to and any comments on it's relaibility.

Thanks for any comments/help,

Kind regards,

Steve
--
+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Steve Hinde                      | Tel  : +33 76.39.77.36             |
| Software Architecture Group  	   | FAX  : +33 76.39.75.18             |
| Bull SA                          | TELEX: 980 648 F                   |
| 1, Rue de Provence - B.P. 208    | S.Hinde@frec.bull.fr		|
| 38432 Echirolles - CEDEX,FRANCE  | xopen.co.uk!s.hinde		|
+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.windows.x
From: nlane@well.sf.ca.us (Nathan D. Lane)
Subject: Re: Hanging X11R4 server under AIX3.2.1
Summary: Loopback interface going down?? 
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 23:24:21 GMT


>Of course, the real question is why the X server got hung in the
>first place.
>
>-- 
>John Gerth       gerth@watson.ibm.com           (914) 784-7639
My 220's Xserver hangs in AIX 3.2.0 quite frequently and seems to be related
to my network crashing at the same time.  I lose ethernet (cannot ping to IBM
from another host), I lose my slip (things go out bug don't come back) and
I lose my loopback - e.g., cannot ping localhost anymore.  After this
happens (e.g., network goes down), I can either expect X to go within five
minutes or 888's with "UNKNOWN" problem codes in the error log.  Sometimes
these crashes are preceeded by tty overruns on my slip line, sometimes
not.

I have not tried logging in to another tty and cat'ting garbage to the
hfs, but I'll try it.

-Nathan Lane
Trico Title Company, Santa Barbara, CA

Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: rahner@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com (Mark Rahner)
Subject: Re: Equivalent of bar for AIX ?
Organization: Lockheed Missiles and Space Co.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 16:25:29 GMT

e-sink@uiuc.edu (Eric W. Sink) writes:
: Is there a program which will let me archive to floppy disk splitting
: across volumes ?  On the Sun, I use bar, which is just a tar lookalike
: that knows how to split across multiple floppy disks.  Is there a
: similar solution for AIX on my RS 6000 model 220 ?

GNU tar will do this on a NeXT, so there's a good chance that it will
work on an RS/6000 too.
-- 
Mark V. Rahner   rahner@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: ajg@controls.ccd.harris.com (Arnold Goldberg)
Subject: @#$@#$#@ IBM compiler
Organization: Harris Controls and Compositions
Distribution: comp
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 19:28:02 GMT


excuse the harsh language but:

We're NFS'ing a sysv (14 character size limit) filesystem
onto an ibm machine.

All files greater then 10 characters do not compile with this error 
message:

 cc -c -DDEBUG -Drs6000 -DX11  -DLEAVE_OUT_SCCS_ID -DXACONST=  -I/xammi -I/xammi/inc   .aps_canI6.c
    1506-208: (S) Compilation ended due to an I/O error.
make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1.
 

From what I understand the IBM compiler creates a temporary file in the
CURRENT working NFS directory (not /tmp or some such) which has something
prepended onto it to exceed the 14 character file size.

Does anyone have a fix (other then not NFS'ing to an IBM computer),
 or is this something that I have to wait on IBM to fix.


thanks

arnold

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold Goldberg                            Email:  ajg@ccd.harris.com
Phone: (407)242-5051                       Snail:  Harris Corporation
Fax  : (407)242-4262                               407 John Rodes Blvd.
                                                   Melbourne, FL 32905
The opinions expressed are my own and do not in any way represent Harris 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: peter@ski.austin.ibm.com (Peter Jeffe 512.838.4019)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: automounted /var/spool/mail
Date: 14 Aug 92 23:51:20 GMT
Organization: The Kernel Group, Inc.

In article <1992Aug13.140721.28145@informatik.uni-ulm.de> borchert@titania.mathematik.uni-ulm.de (Andreas Borchert) writes:
>Mounting /var/spool/mail without root access and without OR option
>works on Suns (at least on our net).  The only problem is mail delivery
>for the root itself but this can be solved by use of aliases.

Acutally, AIX 3.2 should work the same.  I just consider the root
limitation to be a serious one, so I figure that exporting the
directory with root access is the better solution.  But aliasing
root to the nfs server machine should work just fine.

-- 
peter jeffe  peter@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix,comp.windows.x
From: eswu@expo.lcs.mit.edu (Eng-Shien Wu)
Subject: Re: can't connect to Xserver (was Re: X11R5)
Organization: X Consortium, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 01:56:51 GMT

se@IKP.Uni-Koeln.DE (Stefan Esser) writes:

>Does anybody know what's wrong with opening a UNIX domain 
>socket to the server (MITSHM got compiled in as well ...) ?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The socket address structure changed in AIX3.2. This is a temporary
patch to fix it. Apply to XConnDis.c. Save the original XConnDis.c in
case the real patch shows up in a MIT public fix.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 11 Mar 92 15:03:42 PST
From: Minh Tran-Le <TRANLE@intellicorp.com>
Subject: Xlib: unaddr not initialized correctly in MakeUNIXSocketConnection.
Reply-to: tranle@intellicorp.com

### bug number:   5045
### area:         Xlib
### severity:     low
### comments:     

VERSION:
    R5, public-patch-9

CLIENT MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
    IBM RS6000/AIX 3.2

DISPLAY TYPE:
    SkyWay (gda0)

WINDOW MANAGER:
    mwm

COMPILER:
    native cc

AREA:
    Xlib

SYNOPSIS:
    The structure unaddr is not initialized correctly in the function
    MakeUNIXSocketConnection.

DESCRIPTION:
    The initialization of the unaddr.sun_len is not done in the
    the function MakeUNIXSocketConnection().  The sun_len field
    should be set to the length of the sun_path field.

    And the computation of addrlen the length of the sockaddr structure
    is also wrong because it assume that the structure has only 2
    field sun_family and sun_path.

REPEAT BY:
    Compile Xlib under AIX 3.2 and all the clients will fail to open
    the display :0.0.

SAMPLE FIX:
    Here is a context diff for my changes to mit/lib/XConnDis.c.
    The setting of unaddr.sun_len should really be conditionalized
    for AIX V3.2.

*** XConnDis.c-	Fri Sep 13 18:20:28 1991
--- XConnDis.c	Wed Mar 11 11:29:51 1992
***************
*** 442,450 ****
  
      unaddr.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
      sprintf (unaddr.sun_path, "%s%d", X_UNIX_PATH, idisplay);
  
      addr = (struct sockaddr *) &unaddr;
!     addrlen = strlen(unaddr.sun_path) + sizeof(unaddr.sun_family);
  
  #ifdef hpux /* this is disgusting */
      ounaddr.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
--- 442,451 ----
  
      unaddr.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
      sprintf (unaddr.sun_path, "%s%d", X_UNIX_PATH, idisplay);
+     unaddr.sun_len = strlen(unaddr.sun_path);
  
      addr = (struct sockaddr *) &unaddr;
!     addrlen = (sizeof(unaddr) - sizeof(unaddr.sun_path) + unaddr.sun_len);
  
  #ifdef hpux /* this is disgusting */
      ounaddr.sun_family = AF_UNIX;

-------

--
Eng-Shien Wu (eswu@expo.lcs.mit.edu)
IBM Graphic Systems/MIT X Consortium