From: harryo@cbnewse.cb.att.com (harold.r.holm)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Slick Willy's Peace Movement
Summary: Trash, burn, 'n barricade in riots for peace.
Date: 9 Oct 92 03:06:20 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Oct5.220240.8299@dbsun.uucp>, hulsey@dbsun.uucp (hulsey) writes:
> In article <1992Oct3.202943.15437@cbnewse.cb.att.com>
>    harryo@cbnewse.cb.att.com (harold.r.holm) writes:
> >In article <1992Sep27.174415.23122@rchland.ibm.com>,
>    jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl) writes:
> >>  green@plains.NoDak.edu (Brad Green) writes:
> >> |> 
> >> |> : Seems Boy Clinton was a little more than a draft dodger.
> >> |> 
> >> 
> >> Clinton was braver than Quayle.  Clinton could have been arrested
> >> for doing what he thought was right.  Danny Boy, on the other hand, 
> >> just got his daddy to get him into the national guard.  Quayle was 
> >> the coward here, not Clinton.  
> >> 
> >WOW--------could have been *arrested*!!!  Does getting escorted by 
> >a London Bobbie to an English jail cell mean you come home in a 
> >bodybag?
> >
> >Qualye still got in uniform, however tacitly.  That's still closer
> >than Clinton ever got to military service. 
> >
> Four students came home from Kent State in bodybags, and not all of them
> were even protestors.
> 
  A commission that investigated the incident found that the guardsmen
  were in effect sucker-punched (figuratively speaking) by an oncoming
  mob.  It was a complex situation that ended up too difficult for the
  ill-trained guardsmen, fearing for their lives, to handle.  That part
  you don't hear about from the peace-freakie types.  And the armed
  forces were not in the habit of furnishing bodybags for campus riots
  stateside. 

> Yeah, I guess those cowardly anti-war protestors didn't have a *thing* to
> worry about.

Does that include the instigators among the New Mobilization Committee
and Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) jackal-packs who became so
proficient at planning, organizing and executing some of those "protesta-
tions" that could only accurately be described as riots for "peace"??
Barricade the streets, burn the ROTC or "war research" buildings, 
bully their way into campus administration buildings with demands of
third-world studies or whatever other schlock pap, stone and bash
the cops, shout down and physically threaten whoever opposed their
"revolutionary" antics and demands, and practice whatever other
street-action anarchy they could come up with in hopes of toppling
the "evil capitalist imperialist fascists" from power so they could
grab whatever was left from the ashes for themselves.  And don't 
forget those VietCong flags to boot. 

Or, how about those "courageous" souls of the Weathermen mob, 
mind-blitzed on drugs, sex, and acid rock, hyped into a 
revolutionary fervor of solidarity with the oppressed masses
in order to "bring the war home", first trashing the business
area of a major city and later the nation's capital, then going
"underground" to conduct random bombings? (Loved it when that
'pad' of theirs blew up in three or four of their sorry-ass faces
in early '70. What goes around comes around.)

"Protesting" the war---NOT.  Just finding another way to live by
the sword, and in some cases dying by it.  The militant radicals
often asked for it, and in some cases deservedly got it. 

                                                H.R. Holm
*comment my own, standard disclaimers;
 pls to reply via newsgroup only*
                                        ******************************
                                        Vote for Clinton-------
                                        and get your financial ox 
                                        GORE-d......
                                        ******************************
Xref: sparky alt.politics.bush:8671 alt.rush-limbaugh:7124 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6669