HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dpalace@sunland.gsfc.nasa.gov (Dick Palace)
Subject: Advice on projector/viewer
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD
Distribution: rec.photo
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 14:51:58 GMT


I have a need for a slide projector/viewer. That's one of the
kind that has a small viewing screen built in, usually 9" X 9"
or such. They also give you the choice of projection to a screen
if you so desire. There are three venders selling these, Kodak
Bell & Howell and Telex.

I have seen the Kodak Ektagraphs and I like them very much. But,
I don't need the audio capability, which all of the units that 
Kodak sells have. Bell & Howell also only sells units with audio.

Telex sells their Caramates, with or without audio capability, and
that is what I am looking for.

So, the question is, does anyone have any experience with the 
Telex and would like to pass on any pro's or con's? The model
that I would be most interested in is the silent projector with
Auto-Focus. 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Dick
--
Dick Palace         Goddard Space Flight Center      (301) 286-9464

dpalace@sunland.gsfc.nasa.gov
From: psilsbee@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Peter Silsbee)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Paper Mounts eat slides
Summary: I haven't noticed this
Date: 28 Sep 92 18:44:14 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

In article <PHILG.92Sep23123126@zug.ai.mit.edu> philg@martigny.ai.mit.edu writes:
> [. . . sulfur in Kodak paper slide]
>mounts that causes the color around the edges to go red.  This means
>[. . .]
>Has anyone else heard and/or experienced this?
>

Just yesterday I was looking at some 20-year-old Kodachrome slides and I
noticed no such thing. I'd certainly like to know if this is true, though.
It seems awfully silly for Kodak to mount "the most archival color film"
in paper that would do this...

--Peter


Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: zrepachol@cc.curtin.edu.au (Paul Repacholi)
Subject: Re: Ektar vs. Gold
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 17:36:12 GMT

In article <1992Sep26.021234.16137@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, lmitchel@nyx.cs.du.edu (lloyd mitchell) writes:
...
> So, my question is, is Gold 100 any better or worse than Ektar 25?  Also, what
> would be the best film for shooting computer screens with a 35mm camera?
> 

Better meaning what? Faster? No. Finer grain, higher resolution, no contest.
Keep in mind, that in the lab managers eyes, the ideal world is one where Gold
100 was the only one in existance. Never have to shift channels in the printer,
easy to print... 
He does have a channel for Ektar 25?, and uses it?

~Paul
From: bu890@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Brian Segal)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Studio flash advice request
Date: 3 Oct 1992 17:55:53 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I have been using photogenic powerlight 600's for a while now and as aloocatio                                          
have found them to ber very good both on location and in the studio.

As a location unit they are VERY powerful anf two of them will easily light up
any size domestic room even when reversed into a softbox or umbrella.

For studio work they are very useful in that they have a wide and infinitely
adjustable out put range over a 5 stop power latitude (sort of like a
graphic equalizer slider..and the modeling light is proportional to the
flash tube as well).

I regularly get f32 from one reversed into a 24" recessed Apollo with the
difuser panel in place...same with a medium photoflex half or multi dome.

The disadvantages are: They use a lot of power (10 Amps on full power) so
more than two on the same outlet will blow most fuses or breakers in
a domestic situation..you need two fused outlets for three or more.  Each has
to be set separately.

Advantages:  Power to burn; modeling light surrounded by flash tube..you
get a pretty accurate view of the lighting; they have a great bare bulb
pattern... like sunlight on a nice summer morning; built in slaves; 
quite protable; relatively cheap; dependable.

Rather than have three I use two for main and fill and vivitar 285's
for bits here and there or to light up a background, hair etc...I make my own
snoots for the 285 out of black paper and rubber bands.

They are worth considering, those powerlights.

Brian

Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: tonyp@mcs213j.cs.umr.edu (Tony Phillips)
Subject: Re: Ektar vs. Gold
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 02:51:25 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla

In article <1992Sep27.023612.1@cc.curtin.edu.au> zrepachol@cc.curtin.edu.au (Paul Repacholi) writes:
:.... Never have to shift channels in the printer,
:easy to print... 
:He does have a channel for Ektar 25?, and uses it?
:
:~Paul
:

Interesting.  I'm at a loss, now..  The mini-labs I've seen don't do anything
different for different brands of film in the printing area.  In the FILM
processor, yes, but not the printer.  If ya got a negative, you print it.

Has some wacky new technology appeared thats changed printing technology
based on the negative you're printing?


-- 
|  Tony Phillips-  University of Missouri CS Dept.  |  Programmer:  A noun   |
|                                                   |  meaning 'The Art of   |
|  Reply to:  tonyp@mcs213k.cs.umr.edu              |  debugging a blank     |
|  Prefered Address:  S102066@UMRVMA.UMR.EDU        |  sheet of paper'       |
From: cf043@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Lance K. Chun)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: WANTED: UMS 200/2.8L or EF 80-200L (USED or NEW)
Date: 28 Sep 1992 08:13:14 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: cf043@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Lance K. Chun)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu



If you have the above from Canon, e-mail me and we'll negotiate.

Lance
-- 
Lance K. Chun                        E-mail #1  lkchun@heartland.bradley.edu
Photography Major                           #2  cf043@cleveland.freenet.edu
Fashion/Illustration/Advertising            #3  ag459@yfn.ysu.edu
Brooks Institute of Photography                 Santa Barbara, CA, USA     
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: matkohlk@nuscc.nus.sg (Dr Koh Liang Khoon)
Subject: workshop info wanted
Organization: National University of Singapore
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 23:38:34 GMT


I will be in Los Angeles from around 24 Oct to 24 Nov this year. does
anyone know if there is any seminar or workshop in that period in the
west coast especially Los Angeles, Santa Barbara or San Diego. 
thanks in advanced.
From: luong@naxos.inria.fr (Quang-Tuan Luong)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Leica, why so high?
Date: 1 Oct 92 08:10:22 GMT
Reply-To: luong@sophia.inria.fr
Organization: Inria Sofia Antipolis

In article <51260@seismo.CSS.GOV>, pulli@seismo.CSS.GOV (Jay Pulli) writes:

|> labor intensive.  Not to mention the mark/dollar ratio.  I have
|> a Leica M3 and a couple of Nikons.  I can always tell the difference
|> in the pictures.

Really ? Using print or slide film ? At what enlargement ? Do you look
with bare eyes or do you use a magnifier ? I am asking all these questions
because I find it generally hard to see any difference at all in normal 
viewing conditions, between two pictures taken with roughly equivalent 
cameras.

|>                Most Leica lenses are tack sharp, with high contrast
|> and superb color correction.  The Nikon is good, the Leica is great.

It seems that according to measurements they are indeed very good and
often slighty superior than Japanese lenses, but the difference is not
so big. Also, a lens such as the Micro-Nikkor 60mm has similar or better
performance than its Leica equivalent. Perhaps measurement don't say
everything about lens quality, but then tell me what are your criteria.

Tuan.
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: hintzman@hpljah.hpl.hp.com (Jeff Hintzman)
Subject: Re: B/W sharp nature shots in winter
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1992 21:40:48 GMT
Distribution: na
Reply-To: hintzman@hpljah.hpl.hp.com
Organization: HP IC Business Division R&D, Palo Alto, CA

In article <1992Sep24.190223.24338@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>, ka1gt@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (robert.m.atkins) writes:
|> > 
|> > donl mathis writes:
|> > 
|> > > At some
|> > > point, the bad effects of diffraction begin to overwhelm the good
|> > > effects of the increased depth of field and lens sharpness, and it
|> > > doesn't pay to go beyond that point.  For most lenses on 35mm cameras,
|> > > you probably don't want to go much past f/11, or f/16 in a pinch, if
|> > > you're trying to get the most sharpness.  In some cases, you just *have*
|> > > to go beyond that because you need the depth of field, but try to limit
|> > > yourself to f/11 or so if possible.
|> > 
|> 
|> The effects of diffraction can be calculated quite easily. For a VERY ROUGH
|> rule of thumb, resolution will be limited to ABOUT 1500/f-stop lp/mm. Thus
|> at f11 you can't get more than 136 lp/mm and at f16 yo are limited to 94 lp/mm.
|> Then you take into account the resolution of the film which probably drops
|> these numbers by a factor of two (assuming about 125 lp/mm for the film).
|> Since the eye only resolves about 10 lp/mm, contact prints taken at f64
|> (24 lp/mm) will appear sharp to the eye. If you are going to enlarge then
|> that factor has to be taken into account. A 3x enlargement from a 24 lp/mm
|> negative will give 8 lp/mm (at best) in the print. More enlagement than this
|> and things will begin to look soft. Thus the f-stop at which diffraction
|> becomes important depends on how much enlarging you will be doing. f11 isn't
|> too bad at 35mm, but if you have an 18x24 camera f64 is just fine!

Does this (approximate) rule of 1500/f-stop hold for all focal lengths?
If I had an 18x24(inch) camera, for example, my "normal" lens would be
about 730mm.  At f/64 my aperture would be 11.4mm (as opposed to about
3mm in diameter for a 50mm lens at f/16.)  Is the sharpness of the long
lens really limited by diffraction at this point?  I realize you
(hopefully) won't be enlarging this image, but 1500/64=23 lp/mm,
which is good but not mind-blowing considering the size of the camera.
-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Hintzman                                  hintzman@hpljah.hpl.hp.com
Hewlett-Packard Integrated Circuit Business Division 
Palo Alto, CA                                              (415) 857-7616
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: lenehanj@ul.ie
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: How do you pronounce Leica?
Date: 5 Oct 92 18:52:07 GMT
Organization: University of Limerick, Ireland

In article <1992Oct2.144453.7287@tom.rz.uni-passau.de>, blueml@forwiss.uni-passau.de (Guenter Blueml) writes:
> lenehanj@ul.ie writes:
> 
>>In article <1992Sep30.134224.3731@news.columbia.edu>, fag2@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Farul A Ghazali) writes:
>>> Like the subject line says, how do you pronounce Leica? Is is 'lay
>>> car' or 'lee car' or what? I'm having a bet with my friend and we need
>>> some expert advice to settle this thing.
> 
> 
>>Try "lie-ca". AS far as I know there isn't any "r" at the end !
> 
>>Des O'Donoghue c/o lenehanj@ul.ie ( University of Limerick, Ireland)
> 
> leica comes from "leitz-camera" and the pronounciation is "lei"
> as in li(ght) and "ca" as in camera.
> 

Oops ! should have mentioned that english speaking members should pronounce
"lie" as rhyming with "sky"....

Des O'Donoghue.
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: smustopo@nyx.cs.du.edu (sofjan mustopoh)
Subject: Re: Tokina 28-70/3.5-4.5 MF vs AF question
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 92 18:51:22 GMT

In article <BvnsGu.xs@hsi.com> jims@hsi.com (Jim Switalski) writes:
>Background:
>        I ordered the above (Tokina SZ 28-70/3.5-4.5) MF lens for 
>	my Pentax K-1000 from B&H in early September.  I ran into the old 
>	it was in stock, but not when they went to fill the order.  
>	They have no idea when they might get the lens from
>	Tokina (or whoever they get their stuff from).  I got a call
>	asking if I wanted to keep the order on hold, cancel the order, or
>	substitute an auto focus version of the lens (for same price).
>	BTW - they've already charged my credit card (although they told me
>	they'd credit my card if I cancel). Seems kinda bogus of them to
>	charge me before they ship the item.  8-(
>
>Question:
>	What I'd like to know is, what kind of differences are there between
>	the auto focus and the manual focus?  Someone has mentioned to me 
>	that the AF would be a little heavier.  Is that about it or are 
>	there other factors which should influence my decision????  
>	The K-1000 is fully manual, so the AF feature would not be useful. 
>	However, if I got an AF Pentax in the future (which I'm not planning 
>	to do at this time), I guess the AF could be a plus.
>
>	Any suggestions as to go with the AF or not would be helpful.  
>	Thanks in advance.
>
>
>	-jims
>-- 
>Jim Switalski                      |        I think Calloway and
>3M Health Information Systems      |        Mulligan were Friends 
>..!uunet!hsi!jims or jims@hsi.com |          - S. Cramer



     I don't think af version can fit manual focus pentax

    or is Pentax join Nikon using  the same manual focus
    mounts in the AF mounts. 

  Muskie

Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: D98O@br1.hrz.th-darmstadt.de (Jochen Fuehrer)
Subject: Re: How do you pronounce Leica?
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 07:25:38 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20
Organization: Technical University Darmstadt, Germany


In <13371@texsun.Central.Sun.COM> dbernard@thewho.Central.Sun.COM writes:

> Like, I like a leica.  Like-a that.
> 
> 	Dave

This is correct! 
Jochen from Germany
From: al@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Alan Peterman)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Leica, why so high?
Date: 29 Sep 92 15:13:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: qiclab.1992Sep29.151357.21599
Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon.

In article <90826@netnews.upenn.edu> liang@saul.cis.upenn.edu (Chuck Liang) writes:
>  Infact, if you are looking for a top-quality manual focus SLR with 
>aperture priority AE and SPOT METERING with a 50mm lens, what are your
>choices?
>  
>The Olympus OM4-T,
>The Canon F-1n,
>A good, used Leica R-3.
>
>  Guess which one is cheaper.  Can someone think of something else?

Well a good used OM-4 is in the $250-300 range, and OM-2S is in the $150-200
range...

-- 
Alan L. Peterman                                 (503)-684-1984 hm & work
                       al@qiclab.scn.rain.com
It's odd how as I get older, the days are longer, but the years are shorter!
From: my00@gte.com (Michael Yuen)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Metal View Cameras
Date: 28 Sep 92 16:28:33 GMT
Followup-To: rec.photo
Organization: GTE Labs

In article <1a0ivjINNp9j@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, bu890@cleveland.Freenet.Edu
(Brian Segal) wrote:
> 
> 
> Outdoor and Travel Photography has an interesting review of the
> Carbon Infinity field/view camera..interesting because it has 360 degree
> swings (hey, self portraits!!) ans 180 degree tilt in case you want
> to shoot your shoes...
> 

360 degree swing?  Give me a break. Does it have a mirror inside the
bellow???

-Mike
From: yyh@osustat.mps.ohio-state.edu (Yu-Yun Ho)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Your opinion on Pentax PZ-10 needed
Date: 6 Oct 1992 17:06:14 GMT
Organization: Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: osustat.mps.ohio-state.edu

Dear netters:

I joined this news group about 3 weeks ago when I bought my first SLR
camera. It's a Pentax PZ-10 with a fully automatic 28mm f3.5 - 80mm f4.7 
zoom lens. 
I've seen a lot of disscussion on Nikon and Canon SLR's,
but never have I seen any body talked about Pentax on the net,
which made me loose confidence in my new camera thinking that perhaps
I had made a wrong decision. 
I ordered a FA 100-300mm zoom lens and some other accessories from B&H
last week, and they are expected to arrive any day now.
Is my PZ-10 good enough for me to invest a large amount of money
on it? So far, I've spent about $900 on it.

Any opinion from you is highly appreciated.

Yuyun

********************************************************
* Yuyun Ho                                             *
* Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University  *
* yyh@osustat.mps.ohio-state.edu                       *
*                                                      *
********************************************************
From: hasker@m.cs.uiuc.edu (Rob Hasker)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Leica, why so high?
Date: 29 Sep 92 18:13:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: m.1992Sep29.181349.15468
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL

geoff@pmafire.inel.gov (Geoff Allen) writes:

>View camera shutters are, of course, also quiet.  Why disturb the
>beautiful quiet of the forest with an obnoxious <clunk> <whirrrrrrrr>
>when you can have a mere <tick> instead?

Preceded and followed, of course, by the noise of setting up a tripod, cursing
as you try to get everything in focus, cursing again when you bang the
film-holder against the camera and have to refocus, and screams of agony when
the light changes or the wind starts to blow just when you have everything
ready to go. :-)

Rob
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: sparks@col.hp.com (John Sparks)
Subject: Re: Metal View Cameras
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 18:44:54 GMT
Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division

In article <1a0ivjINNp9j@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bu890@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Brian Segal) writes:
>Outdoor and Travel Photography has an interesting review of the
>Carbon Infinity field/view camera..interesting because it has 360 degree
>swings (hey, self portraits!!) ans 180 degree tilt in case you want
>to shoot your shoes...
>
>But is does sound like a nice camera..but costs over 6,000 clams...

At a John Sexton workshop I attended this summer, John was asked if the
Linhof Master Technika that he used would be what he would choose today
if cost was no object and he said that he thought so but he would also have
to consider the the Carbon Infinity (he didn't really know all that much
about it however).  Of course a new Master Technika is close to the 
same price.

John Sparks
From: dbernard@thewho.Central.Sun.COM (Dave Bernard)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: about N90 and new F4
Date: 29 Sep 92 12:10:24 GMT
Reply-To: dbernard@thewho.Central.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems

>	Also, for those of you out there who remember the F3, you will know
>that the F3 was upgraded at least 3 times during it's production run as well as
>having more than one version, (F3, F3HP, F3T, F3P).

Note that the F3->F3HP was not a different F3, but a different meter finder.
Just as the F/Ft/FTn and F2/F2A/F2AS/F2ASb, or whatever, were simply F2s with
different meter finders.  You could also get Titanium and Auto-Exposure F2's,
as well as "auto-focus" F3s.  Things like F3T and F3P were professional (and
probably in most cases, boutique) special purpose editions, offered not as replacements
but in addition to the vanilla F3.

From: andyc@hplsla.hp.com (Andy Cassino)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 17:30:56 GMT
Subject: Re: night exposures for traffic
Organization: HP Lake Stevens, WA
Newsgroups: rec.photo

yyh@osustat.mps.ohio-state.edu (Yu-Yun Ho) writes:
> 
> I am a beginner, I am fascinated by the picture of patterns 
> formed by traffic on a highway during the night--cars turning into
> streaming ribbons of light. It will be a dream
> come true if I can take such pictures myself. I have a 28-80 f3.5
> zoom lens and am buying a new 100-300 f4.5 zoom lense , can I use either
> of the lenses to shoot such scenes? If not, what kind of lens should I
> get?  
> 
> Yuyun
> ----------

Yes, you can use either one, just pick the one that gives you the composition
you want. Virtually any kind of lens can be used for this type of work. I
tend to prefer something like 300mm to 400mm myself, it makes it easier 
to isolate patterns in an urban area. But, I have not done much of this, just
a couple of rolls while doing other night photography.

If you want to get going fast, try a roll of Fujichrome 50D or Velvia.
A basic exposure is f/11 for 2-4 minutes. Use the "B" or "T" shutter setting, 
a cable release and a tripod. I haven't tried any other films.


    %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    % Andy Cassino                                       %
    % Hewlett-Packard - Lake Stevens Instrument Division %
    %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
From: 6500gw@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Gary Wang)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: AGFA 25 APX & Rodinal
Keywords: AGFA
Date: 3 Oct 92 21:50:07 GMT
Distribution: rec

Hi, I just read an artical in outdoor photography
about agfa 25 apx and rodinal.Has anyone use it before ?
How does it compare to TMX 100 ?

The auther mention the dilution 1+50 to get the
finest grain possible ? Does that work for TMAX also?

Has anyone try the combination of TMX 100 and Rodinal ?

Thanks in Advance

Gary Wang
wang@nemesis.ece.ucsb.edu
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: miller@sctc.com (Steven M. Miller)
Subject: Nikon N90 Features Summary
Organization: SCTC
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 03:10:09 GMT

I've had mine for a week.   Been very happy with how the camera operates.
I've run a couple of rolls through it and the results are excellant.
I can't wait till I get a good feel for the camera and the accessories
are available.

_Steve

Summary of NIKON N90 Features.

(many features require pricey options, 'D' lens', SB25 speedlite,
 MF26 databack, Sharp Wizard )
                  
                 
Feature/Camera   |  N90    |
============================
Price at CW of O |$749.85  |
Built-in Flash   |No       |
Predictive AF    |Yes      |
Wide-Area AF     |Yes      |
Spot-Area AF     |Yes      |
AF-Mode          |Focus-Priority or Release-Priority|
Portrait Program |Yes      | /* 7 Built-In Programs */
Red Eye Red Prog |w/ SB-25 | 
Landscape Prgm.  |Yes      |
Hyperfocal Prgm. |Yes      |
Close-up Program |Yes      |
Sports Program   |Yes      |
Silouette program|Yes      |
Indoor program   |No       |
Load Ext. Prgms  |Yes      | /* Requires Sharp Wizard 8000 model + interface */
Ap/shutter  Prio |Yes/Yes  |
All Manual mode  |Yes      |
Shiftable program|No       |
FocusAssistLight |w/ SB-25 |
Slowest Shutter  |30 sec   |
Fastest Shutter  |1/8000   |
Multiple Expos.  |w/back   |
Bracketing       |w/back   |
Meter Modes      |3D-M/C/S | /* 3-Dimensional Matrix Metering with New Lens' */
Meter Range      |EV -1to21|
Focus light      |EV -1to19|
Remote           |??       |
Mirror lockup    |No       |
Eyepiece Shutter |Yes      |
# of focus zones |2        |
body wt. w/o batt|26.6 o   |
Battery type     |4 x AA   |
Delay Timer      |2-30 sec |
Mount            |Nikon F  |
Flash Exp. Comp. |Auto/Yes |
Exposure Comp    |+-5 in .3|
DX-override      |6 to 6400|
Sync Speed       |to 1/4000|
Meter Segments   |8        |
Backlit Display  |Yes      |
Interval Timer   |w/ back  |
Max Frames/sec   |3.6      |
Shake Warning    |Yes      | 
"Trap" focus     |w/ back  |
Removable Back   |Yes      |
Rewind w/tongue  |NA       |
Curtain Sync     |frt/rear%| /* also slow sync */
Image Size Lock  |No       |
Focus Motor      |Integral | /* in lens for AF-I lens */
Zoom motor       |         |
Extra Frames     |NA       |
Dep.field preview|Yes      |
Bat.Ind. levels  |4        | 
Speaker on/off   |Yes      |
Viewfinder cov(%)|92       |
Diopter Adjust.  |Opt=     |
Aperature adj.   |Lens     |
Material of Body |b=C&M,f=M|
AE/AF lock       |Yes/Yes  |
Est.Rolls/BATT. &|75 & ??  | /* Alkaline-Manganese */
ChangeFocusScreen|Yes      |
----------------------------
-- 
Steven Miller
miller@sctc.com
``He's dead Jim!  You grab his tricoder.  I'll grab his wallet.''