HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mechalas@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (John P. Mechalas)
Subject: Re: Vi for MS-Windows
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 23:25:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.224822.11623@wam.umd.edu> mmeltzer@wam.umd.edu writes:
>In article <BxvMCB.LMM@ansoft.com> gupta@ansoft.com (Suvajit Gupta)  
>writes:
>:-> Is there a good public domain UNIX-style vi editor that runs under
>:-> Microsoft Windows?  Ideally, it should allow resizing of the window
>:-> it runs in.  I currently have a PC vi that runs under DOS, but it
>:-> is limited to run in DOS windows (24 lines only!).
>
>Pardon me if this sounds rude, but why would you want to use VI in  
>Windows?  It makes no sense to me to use only the keyboard in a graphical  
>user interface.  NotePad is a good editor, and if you don't think so, I'm  
>sure Write, or your other word processors can do a good job.

Several reasons come to my mind:

   1) Once you learn vi, it's hard to break the habit.  And if you can
      have it on both Unix and DOS machines, why bother using a different
      editor each time?

   2) Notepad and most other text editors store the entire file in RAM.
      This limits the maximum file size that they can handle.  Proper
      VI clones use swap/temporary files for storage, so there is no
      limit on the size of the file that can be edited.

   3) Word processors are larger programs and take longer to load.  Of
      course, if speed isn't an issue, I guess it doesn't matter.


-- 
John Mechalas                                          "I'm not an actor, but
mechalas@gn.ecn.purdue.edu                                 I play one on TV."
Aero Engineering, Purdue University                     #include disclaimer.h
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: moore@iastate.edu (Brian J Moore)
Subject: Re: MS ACCESS vs PARADOX/Win
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:08:09 GMT

In <1992Nov17.020124.21711@eng.umd.edu> senft@eng.umd.edu (Matt T. Senft) writes:

>In article <moore.721949552@pv34c1.vincent.iastate.edu> moore@iastate.edu (Brian J Moore) writes:
>>In <1992Nov16.183820.14695@eng.umd.edu> senft@eng.umd.edu (Matt T. Senft) writes:
>>
>>>In article <1992Nov16.165628.8451@PacBell.COM> jcwasik@srv.PacBell.COM (Joe Wasik) writes:
>>>>In an article JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu writes:
>>>>
>>>>>And how does Access relate to FoxPro for Windows, which I had assumed was
>>>>>going to be MS's database for Windows?
>>>>
>>>>These are two separate products.  Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the
>>>>Access product has been known for years as "Project Cairo."  MS already had
>>>>it when they bought out FoxPro.  I do not know what their plans are.  One
>>>>would hope they would migrate these two products together.
>>
>>FoxPro was an acquired product and not as sophisticated as Access,
>>you'll see this by the pricing of the two databases.
>FoxPro and Access are sophisticated products in their own right.  Each is
>targeted at somewhat different markets.  They share some common capabilities
>as well as some things which are unique to each.  As for the pricing
>speaking, the 99$ for Microsoft Access is a limited time only offer. Starting
>after Jan. 31, '93 they will both be sold at SRP of 495$US.  With comparable
>upgrade, trade-in, and additional licensing prices.  

The SRP of Access will be $695 after 31 JAN... that makes the current
offer more attractive???

Brian
-- 
   ________________________________________________________________________
  /                                  /                                    /
 /  Brian J. Moore                  /                  moore@iastate.edu /
/__________________________________/____________________________________/
From: alpert@rambler.UUCP (Tuna Palace Systems)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Need Windows/Network Rolodex program
Date: 20 Nov 92 05:35:51 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Tuna Palace Systems, Camden NJ 609-854-5297

[]

Can anyone recommend a decent Rolodex-type program for Windows
that is Novell compatible?  Need something that will permit both
a shared global phone list as well as individual private phone
lists.  Any leads on shareware or commercial programs of this
type will be appreciated!

    		Bob Alpert
    		Tuna Palace Systems

==============================================================================
Bob Alpert : Tuna Palace Systems : Camden, NJ : alpert%rambler@kb2ear.ampr.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*   Government agents are swine. |   Smash the State before it's too late!   *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*   Heroin Crack Kill Bush Death Quayle AK-47 CIA Destroy NSA Anarchy LSD    *
*   Death IRS Government Overthrow Sell Cocaine Marijuana Buy Destroy FBI    *
==============================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: J.M.Ross@man0507.wins.icl.co.uk (J.M.Ross)
X400-Received: by mta eros.uknet.ac.uk in /PRMD=UK.AC/ADMD=GOLD 400/C=GB/;
               Relayed; Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:08:43 +0000
X400-Received: by /PRMD=icl/ADMD=gold 400/C=GB/; converted (ia5); Relayed;
               Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:04:11 +0000
X400-Originator: J.M.Ross@man0507.wins.icl.co.uk
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=icl/ADMD=gold 400/C=GB/;man0507 0000005900000842]
Original-Encoded-Information-Types: undefined
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2)
Content-Identifier: 842
Subject: DDE/DDEML question
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:04:11 +0000







A query about DDE/DDEML.

I want to add DDE capability to an existing application. Some
of the users of the application still use Windows 3.0 and have no
intention of upgrading to Windows 3.1 in the forseeable future.
The Programmers' Guide states that DDEML will work with 3.0, but
it is only issued with 3.1. I would like to use DDEML to implement DDE, but 
if I do this then will 3.0 users be prevented from using my DDE facilities? 
Is it permissable to ship DDEML.DLL with an application?

Please reply by e-mail as I do not subscribe to this newsgroup.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
!  James M. Ross                            ! ICL Computers Ltd   !
+-------------------------------------------+ Wenlock Way         !
!  Tel:   061 223 1301 x2661                ! West Gorton         !
!  Email: j.m.ross@man0507.wins.icl.co.uk   ! MANCHESTER  M12 5DR !
!  EXAC:  j.m.zzross@uk03                   ! UK                  !
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
From: han-esther@yale.edu (Esther Han)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Norton Desktop 2.0
Date: 15 Nov 1992 21:42:16 -0500
Organization: BB&MM&ST Fan Club
NNTP-Posting-Host: minerva.cis.yale.edu

I tried to install Norton Desktop on my computer 
I have stacker.  I chose it as my default shell, but now when it loads up,
not only does it take a *lot* of time, it stops in the middle (after
loading up quick access and Norton Desktop) and says, "NDWMAIN caused a
General Protection Fault in module NWIN2.DLL at 001D:1E2A"

I have a Dell 386sx/16 with 2Mg Ram and 40 Mg Hard drive (about 13.2 left after
installing stacker and Norton Desktop).  I already tried disabling Norton
antivirus (I normally run CPAV, but I rem'ed that, too).  I also got the error
"c:\ndw\nav&.sys  bad or missing file  Error in line 1 of Config.sys) so I
removed this line from my config.sys and updated it for Stacker.  I rebooted,
the error message was gone, but when I tried to load windows, the same message
appeared.

Does anyone have any idea what might be wrong?  I okay'ed everything in the
Norton Desktop Installation...

Thanks!
--
--Est :)                       ()_()             O\ (0)___(0) /O
han-esther@yale.edu             (_)              \ \(  ...  )/ /
han@minerva.cis.yale.edu                        (((   d | b   ))) 
picard@pop.cis.yale.edu        TTFN!		    		  (Pahl-jjahk!)
-- 
--
Geordi, tell me about...Tasha Yar.
    -- Guinan, "Yesterday's Enterprise", stardate 43625.2
From: weiss@mott.seas.ucla.edu (Michael Weiss)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: MS ACCESS vs PARADOX/Win
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:46:25 GMT
Organization: SEASnet, University of California, Los Angeles

In article <168A180F1.JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu> JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu writes:
>And how does Access relate to FoxPro for Windows, which I had assumed was
>going to be MS's database for Windows?

I asked Microsoft this very question.  They told me that Access is easier to
use, but less powerful.  They would not go into further detail than that.  It
kinda pisses me off.

Nonetheless, they did indicate that Access would be a database eligible for
Microsofts competitive upgrade to FoxPro.  Therefore, you can get Access for
$99, and FoxPro for another $99 (or was it $199?).  All in all, not a bad deal
for two software packages of that obvious power.  Furthermore, if you don't
currently have a database package, going the Access-->FoxPro route will still
save you money over purchasing FoxPro straight.
-- 
\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | /
-  Michael  weiss@seas.ucla.edu   |  School of Engineering & Applied Science  -
-   Weiss   izzydp5@oac.ucla.edu  |   University of California, Los Angeles   -
/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | \ 
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: fn@junior.mathtok.polymtl.ca (Francois Normant)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Problem with MS-DOS programs (help needed)
Date: 17 Nov 92 02:45:00 GMT
Organization: Mathematiques Appliquees - Ecole Polytechnique - Montreal

Hi,

I have a 386/40Mhz with 4Mb RAM, a 40MB hard disk (with stacker2.0 -> 80MB)
,an EGA card, a genius mouse , DOS 5.0 and WINDOWS 3.1 installed.

Windows works well in standard mode. It works fine in 386 Enhanced Mode 
except that I cannot run MS-DOS program: they all crash the system. 
I suspect the EGA card because that the only obsolete part on this system,
but It might come from anywhere else !
Has someone experienced the same problem. Any pointers would be
appreciated.

Here is how my config.sys looks like:

device=C:\HIMEM.SYS  
device=C:\EMM386.EXE noems
DOS=HIGH,UMB

rem device STACKER
DEVICEHIGH=C:\STACKER\STACKER.COM C:\STACVOL.DSK
DEVICEHIGH=C:\STACKER\SSWAP.COM C:\STACVOL.DSK /SYNC

rem device EGA
devicehigh=C:\WINDOWS\ega.sys

rem Norton Anti-Virus
DEVICEHIGH=C:\UTIL\NAV\NAV_.SYS

rem Variables systemes
FILES=30
BUFFERS=30
SHELL=C:\DOS\COMMAND.COM /p /e:1024 
STACKS=9,256



Thanks in advance. Please answer by e-mail. I will post a
summary if requested.


-- 
Francois Normant (francois_normant@mathappl.polymtl.ca)
Departement de Mathematiques Appliquees - Ecole Polytechnique
C.P. 6079 - succursale A
Montreal - Quebec - Canada - H3C 3A7
From: z_rasmusseam@ccsvax.sfasu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: Possible to LOAD/UNLOAD TSR's in windows??
Date: 18 Nov 92 14:12:07 CST
Organization: Stephen F. Austin State University

I've had problems with this approach.  My TSR's never seem to function, but
what has worked for me (and this is a pain) is to shell to dos and then run
the TSR.  Do the same to remove it.  I'm in the process of using Windows
Batch and Windows Macro (Wilson Ware stuff) to write a batch/macro to do
all of this but I've not had much time to work on it.  I'll post how I did
it if it works (and if there is enough interest).
    
    ------=====*****=====*****======*****=====*****=====------
    | Adam Murrell Rasmussen                                 |
    |   -- Lpc, C, Pascal, COBOL, Programmer                 |
    |      LINC Network Technician, Steen Library SFASU.     |
    |      Lotus Software Specialist.                        |
    |      Currently taking NCE tests.                       |
    | E-Mail: z_rasmusseam@ccsvax.sfasu.edu                  |
    |                qclaw@brick.pvv.unit.no                 |
    ------=====*****=====*****======*****=====*****=====------
From: JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: MS ACCESS vs PARADOX/Win
Date: 16 Nov 92 20:51:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: uacsc2.168A1DF04.JC924
Organization: University at Albany, Albany NY 12222

In article <1992Nov16.183820.14695@eng.umd.edu>
senft@eng.umd.edu (Matt T. Senft) writes:
 
>In article <1992Nov16.165628.8451@PacBell.COM> jcwasik@srv.PacBell.COM (Joe Wasik) writes:
>>>And how does Access relate to FoxPro for Windows, which I had assumed was
>>>going to be MS's database for Windows?
>>
>>These are two separate products.  Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the
>>Access product has been known for years as "Project Cairo."  MS already had
>>it when they bought out FoxPro.  I do not know what their plans are.  One
>>would hope they would migrate these two products together.
>>
So, what are the differences between Access and FoxPro?  Is Access a more
limited product?  FoxPro is certainly a top-of-the-line database system.
 
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.apps
From: roger@uvmark.uucp (Roger MacNicol)
Subject: Re: Vi for MS-Windows
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 14:31:48 GMT
Organization: VMARK Software, Inc.

>> mmeltzer@wam.umd.edu writes:
>>> gupta@ansoft.com (Suvajit Gupta)  writes:
>>>> Is there a good public domain UNIX-style vi editor that runs under
>>>> Microsoft Windows?  Ideally, it should allow resizing of the window
>>>> it runs in.  I currently have a PC vi that runs under DOS, but it
>>>> is limited to run in DOS windows (24 lines only!).
>>>
>>> Pardon me if this sounds rude, but why would you want to use VI in
>>> Windows? It makes no sense to me to use only the keyboard in a
>>> graphical user interface. NotePad is a good editor, and if you don't
>>> think so, I'm sure Write, or your other word processors can do a good
>>> job.

You miss the whole point - the word-processor paradigm can only offer 50% of
what is needed for efficient editing. You need a command mode as well.

For example (taken from "Learning VI" by Linda Lamb), if you wanted to
standardize on two spaces after periods and colons throughout a
document you would enter:

:%s/\([:.]\)<space><space>*/\1<space><space>/g

this would find a colon or period followed by one or more spaces and replace
them with exactly two spaces.  You might think the command is ugly but I defy
you to do this more elegantly in WordPerfect macro language!

I only buy Windows software for home use but I find the ideological 
enforcement of its single paradigm oppressive.  Drag and drop cutting and
pasting is wonderful for local rearrangements of text but for a massive
reorganisation or a large document its painful.

- Roger

ObMS-App: Polaris Packrat has the world's most intuitive interface


-- 
******************************************************************
* Roger MacNicol, Snr. Software Engineer
* VMark Software, Inc., 30 Speen Street, Framingham, MA 01701-1800
* email: uvmark%roger@merk.com
From: wxt5592@hertz.njit.edu (wei tang cis stnt)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Help (.hlp) file converted needed.
Date: 15 Nov 92 19:50:09 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.



  I am desperately looking for a windows .hlp file to microsoft word .doc file

conversion program.  

  If this is not available, any .hlp to .wri or even flat ascii file converter

will just be fin.

  Please tell me where I can get them. (or mail it to me) I appreciate it.


  David.
  wxt5592@hertz.njit.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: cid@athena.mit.edu (Derek H Cedillo)
Subject: Swap File Size & Deleting a file (was: Small..HD Memory!!!)
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:34:11 GMT


Hello, once again.

Can somebody make some recomendations on swap files?
Particularly, Permanent Vs. Temporary.  And how big do you
really need it?  (Sure they rec. 8.16M, but is it neccesary?)

Also, I cant delete a hidden file, it is not a .SYS file,
it is just a stupid file I downloaded frmo my unix.
It has a .MSS extension because of Scribe.  Could this be the problem?

Thanks a million!!


Derek


---------------------------------------
"There Are Two Great Tragedies In Life,
	One Is Not To Get Your Heart's Desire.
		The Other Is To Get It.
				-Bernard Shaw 
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: paschall@utdallas.edu (Dwayne Paschall)
Subject: MSWindows and X-Windows
Keywords: Windows, X
Reply-To: $USER@utdallas.edu
Organization: The University of Texas at Dallas
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 15:14:31 GMT

We have just bought a local bus 50 MHZ i486DX computer that we are using as graphics 
and computational modeling workstation in our lab. In the next room, we have an array 
of SUN workstations which run Open Windows. Our question is what software is avaliable 
for running some of our X-Windows applications (Like Framemaker and Matlab v.4.0) as a 
windowed application on the 486-50 PC? We already have an ethernet card, but it is used 
mainly for file transfers and remote telnet logons (we don't use Netware for example).

I think I remeber seeing ads from a company (Spectrographics?) that made a product 
called PC-Xview. Is this correct or an hallucination? Does anyone know of ANY product that 
will let us run our X-Windows apps under MS Windows as a Windows app?
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  //\    //\\\                 M3    "The ULTIMATE Driving Machine"
 //  \  //  \\\                M5          paschall@utdallas.edu
//    \//    \\\otor Sport     850i             
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.os.os2.misc
From:  Greg Wilson <gregw@advtech.uswest.com>
Subject: any experience with Aamazing Tech. video cards?
Originator: gregw@isaacs
Reply-To:  Greg Wilson <gregw@advtech.uswest.com>
Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:22:30 GMT

PC World has rated Aamazing Technologies VGA700 accelerated video
card as a "Best Buy."  At a street price of $70, it is by far the
cheapest accelerated card around.  While its Windows performance
can't compare with the ATI Graphics Ultra, it certainly out-performs
my Trident 8900c.  When I called Aamazing, I was told that OS/2 
drivers would be available after COMDEX, in a couple of weeks.

Does anyone have an experience with Aamazing cards?  BTW, the VGA700 
comes with 512K, while the VGA1000 (with a street price of $125)
comes with 1M.

Thanks in advance!

--
Greg Wilson       | USER: A word computer professionals use 
gregw@uswest.com  |       when they mean "idiot."  Dave Barry
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: senft@eng.umd.edu (Matt T. Senft)
Subject: Re: MS ACCESS vs PARADOX/Win
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 18:52:01 GMT
Organization: Project GLUE, University of Maryland, College Park

In article <moore.722020089@pv34c1.vincent.iastate.edu> moore@iastate.edu (Brian J Moore) writes:
>In <1992Nov17.020124.21711@eng.umd.edu> senft@eng.umd.edu (Matt T. Senft) writes:
>
>>In article <moore.721949552@pv34c1.vincent.iastate.edu> moore@iastate.edu (Brian J Moore) writes:
>>>In <1992Nov16.183820.14695@eng.umd.edu> senft@eng.umd.edu (Matt T. Senft) writes:
>>>
>>>>In article <1992Nov16.165628.8451@PacBell.COM> jcwasik@srv.PacBell.COM (Joe Wasik) writes:
>>>>>In an article JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>>And how does Access relate to FoxPro for Windows, which I had assumed was
>>>>>>going to be MS's database for Windows?
>>>>>
>>>>>These are two separate products.  Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the
>>>>>Access product has been known for years as "Project Cairo."  MS already had
>>>>>it when they bought out FoxPro.  I do not know what their plans are.  One
>>>>>would hope they would migrate these two products together.
>>>
>>>FoxPro was an acquired product and not as sophisticated as Access,
>>>you'll see this by the pricing of the two databases.
>>FoxPro and Access are sophisticated products in their own right.  Each is
>>targeted at somewhat different markets.  They share some common capabilities
>>as well as some things which are unique to each.  As for the pricing
>>speaking, the 99$ for Microsoft Access is a limited time only offer. Starting
>>after Jan. 31, '93 they will both be sold at SRP of 495$US.  With comparable
>>upgrade, trade-in, and additional licensing prices.  
>
>The SRP of Access will be $695 after 31 JAN... that makes the current
>offer more attractive???

The SRP of Microsoft Access will NOT be $695 but $495 after 31 January.

>Brian

Matt
(Admission: I work for Microsoft)


Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: doc@magna.com (Matthew J. D'Errico)
Subject: Re: Star Trek...The screen saver
Keywords: AFTER DARK,WINDOWS,SCREENSAVER,STARTREK
Organization: Magna Software Corporation
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:33:34 GMT

In article <18NOV199214400804@trentu.ca> spowell@trentu.ca (STEFAN POWELL) writes:
>In article <1992Nov17.180959.16639@dorsai.com>, carlos@dorsai.com (Carlos Domenguez) writes...
>>Any comments about ST-TSS?
>What is "Star Trek...The screen saver" ?

_Star Trek: The Screen Saver_ is a version of Berkeley's After Dark which
contains Star Trek TOS (The Original Series for you non-trekkers) oriented
displays or savers...  It is fully compatible with After Dark 2.0, and
you can even mix the savers in Multi-Modules...

I'm a Beta Tester, and the "Final Candidate" I received this past weekend
is working just fine...  I expect that you should see it shipping very
shortly from Berkeley to you or your distributer...

If you're a Star trek (TOS, natch) fan, you'll LOVE it !!!

-- Doc
...........................................................................
:                     ___                                                 :
:        ___....-----'---`-----....___                                    :
:  =========================================        Matthew J. D'Errico   :
:         ___`---..._______...---'___                mderrico@magna.com   :
:        (___)      _|_|_|_      (___)              mderrico@mattrx.com   :
:          \\____.-'_.---._`-.____//                        \|/           :
:           `~~~~`.__`---'__.'~~~~'                         -*-           :
:                    ~~~~~                                  /|\           :
:.........................................................................:
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: moore@iastate.edu (Brian J Moore)
Subject: Re: MS ACCESS vs PARADOX/Win
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 16:27:41 GMT

In <1992Nov17.185201.4782@eng.umd.edu> senft@eng.umd.edu (Matt T. Senft) writes:

>>The SRP of Access will be $695 after 31 JAN... that makes the current
>>offer more attractive???

>The SRP of Microsoft Access will NOT be $695 but $495 after 31 January.

>Matt
>(Admission: I work for Microsoft)

Better check with your Product Manager... its being advertised at $695,
in the latest "Focus on Microsoft Windows" which was sent out recently
with Maples smiling about it....

Brian

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________________
  /                                  /                                    /
 /  Brian J. Moore                  /                  moore@iastate.edu /
/__________________________________/____________________________________/
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: garber@aru.dom.uab.edu (David W. Garber)
Subject: Win for Wkgrps and DEC Pathworks
Keywords: Pathworks, Windows, Workgroups
Organization: Univ of Ala. @ Birmingham
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:44:22 GMT

Has anyone gotten Windows for Workgroups to work with DEC Pathworks?
I've got Pathworks 4.1 running with a 3Com Etherlink II adaptor with
NDIS drivers.  Although the Windows for Workgroups manual says that
resources can be shared in Pathworks networks, when I tried to install
Win Workgrps, I got a message stating that the network was not compatible.
This seems to be true.  When I remarked out the DEC drivers and left
the Windows NDIS drivers in, I could no longer hook up to Pathworks.
Any suggestions?