HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: caugherd@cs.rpi.edu (Dan Caugherty)
Subject: *HELP* with PC/IP utility NetWatch!!!
Summary: Regarding the PC-based utility package by MIT (& CMU, Clarkson, et al.)
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Computer Science, Troy NY
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 01:55:18 GMT

To Whom It May Concern --

I have a question regarding M.I.T.'s Netwatch.  I'm currently using an
IBM-AT compatible with a 3com 501 board and MS C 5.0.  When I run a
newly compiled version of Netwatch, no packets are displayed; however,
when I run the same executable (compiled, etc.  2 years ago -- well
before I had even heard of the package, and when its name was still
NETWATCH.EXE, not 3NETWATC.EXE, PNETWATC.EXE, etc.), it will display
any packets that I care to see.  (Interesting twist: when I run my
newly-compiled version first, the older version fails to display
anything as well!)  Has anyone else had this problem?  Also, can
anyone suggest steps for its correction?  I'm planning on adding
IGP-sniffing capabilities to the package (for credit in a Networking
Software course), so I could use all the replies I can get.

Gratefully yours,

Dan Caugherty   caugherd@cs.rpi.edu   C.S. Dept.,
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY  12180-3590
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: chinson@chin.cs.ucla.edu (Chinson Yi)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Router Info. Request
Date: 17 Apr 92 18:26:24 GMT
Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department


Hello, Fellow Netters 

We are looking for good high performance routers.  Cisco and Wellfleet
came to our attention.  I would like to hear from Cisco and Wellfleet users 
regarding its reliability, performance, and other maintenance related 
issues.  I would like to hear about other router recommendations also.

Thanks in advance

-- 
   /\~ /\      O\_  "I think my golf ball landed around here."
 ~/\/\/  \~  +--\\\                          
~~ ~~~~~ ~~  |  /|@       
/      \   \ !  \ \  Chinson Yi (chinson@cs.ucla.edu 310-206-3584)
From: roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Minimal ping object?
Date: 9 Apr 92 22:00:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: phri.1992Apr9.220041.15081
Organization: Public Health Research Institute, New York


	What is the absolute cheapest pingable object I can put on an
ethernet?  I supose to be practical, I should limit the field to
commercially available devices, but just for fun, let's assume I was
willing to build or modify something as long as it's reasonable (and no,
I'm not exactly sure what the limits of reasonable are).
-- 
roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
Public Health Research Institute
455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
"This never happened to Bart Simpson."
From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Two Novice Questions
Date: 16 Apr 1992 03:32:41 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: gandalf.think.com

In article <1992Apr15.162201.1778@vixvax.mgi.com> jlundell@vixvax.mgi.com writes:
>I have two very novice questions. 

I could give simple answers in this followup, but I think you would be
better served by getting a good book, such as "Unix Network Programming" by
Stevens, or "Internetworking with TCP/IP" by Comer.  They can do a much
more thorough job than is possible in this medium.
-- 
Barry Margolin
System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com          {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
From: hom00@ccc.amdahl.com (Harold O Morris)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: tn3270 Failure - Not Enough Fields?
Date: 7 Apr 92 23:51:18 GMT
Reply-To: hom00@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Harold O Morris)
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

We are running a version of tn3270 - seems to be 4.1.1, and about 3 years
old (but I find the same version - at least is called 4.1.1, on ftp.uu.net).
It works on most applications, but on one it always fails.  This application
has a very large number of single-character fields (kind of like checkmarks),
and one theory a colleague had was that some array was designed to
accommodate too few fields, if I just knew where to look.

If anyone has heard of such a problem, or knows where I should look for
the most current version of tn3270, I would appreciate hearing from you.
Xref: sparky comp.protocols.tcp-ip:2460 comp.windows.x:9711 comp.unix.admin:2737 comp.dcom.lans.misc:201
From: chris@visionware.co.uk (Chris Davies)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.windows.x,comp.unix.admin,comp.dcom.lans.misc
Subject: Re: LAN and WAN speeds (summary)
Date: 8 Apr 92 12:41:57 GMT
Organization: VisionWare Ltd., Leeds, UK
Originator: chris@poohbear

In article <9204021327.AA10923@poohbear.visionware.co.uk> I wrote:
> Considering a link speed of around 64 or 128 kbit/sec.
> We're planning to run IP over the link; I'd imagine a
> couple of rlogin sessions at any one time, plus several (6 or so?) X
> display servers, etc.

I'd like to thank all those who emailed me with comments.  It appears
that a fair number of sites run X over 64kbit and 128kbit likes.  Some
people find the speed acceptable, others find it "alright".  The
prinicpal difficulty occurs if you try to manipulate (or use) large
bitmaps.

The consensus was that about 5-10 xterms would work over a 64kbit link
without too many problems.  However, my question was rather like the
"how long's a piece of string" one.

NFS/RFS was considered a no-no (however, I believe it depends on all
sorts of things like buffer size, etc).

Regarding routers, Cisco, or Morning Star's Snaplink appeared to be the
main contenders to a NetBlazer (as I expected).  All of these use PPP
in varying degrees.  SnapLink and NetBlazers support on-demand dialup
IP; I don't know about the Cisco.

Again, thanks to those who replied.

Chris
-- 
         VISIONWARE LTD, 57 Cardigan Lane, LEEDS LS4 2LE, England
  Tel +44 532 788858 x238.  Fax +44 532 304676.  Email chris@visionware.co.uk
------------ "VisionWare:   The home of DOS/SQL/UNIX/X integration" -----------
From: jcc@gna.axis-design.fr (Jean-Christophe Collet)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: proxyarp sources described in RFC 1027 ?
Date: 15 Apr 92 14:04:54 GMT
Organization: GNA c/o Axis Design 119 rue de Flandre 75019 Paris

Hello folks,

In the RFC 1027, Carl Mitchell & Quaterman described a set of modifications
to apply in BSD 4.3 sources that implement the proxyarp.
It mentions an ftp site (sally.utexas.edu), but it does not exist anymore!
Does anybody there who knows where I could find those diffs ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Please reply by Email.

Thanx a lot in advance

-- Jean-Christophe (aka "Jessie")
   jcollet@expdat.gna.org
From: sklower@diva.Berkeley.EDU (Keith Sklower)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: default address mask selection for a point-to-point network?
Date: 13 Apr 92 05:25:09 GMT
Organization: /etc/organizaton

In article <BOB.92Apr9155631@volitans.MorningStar.Com> bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes:
(A reasonably accurate analysis of deficiencies of subnetting provided
with 4.3BSD per se):
>The need for consistency between interfaces is, I think, an artifact
>of deficiencies in some vendors' 4.3BSD-based code, or perhaps in
>4.3BSD itself.  I haven't examined tahoe, reno, BSDI, or 4.4 to see
>what they do.

I'm grateful that Bob acknowledges that Berkeley may have rectified
historical shortcomings.  This restriction was removed in the
4.3-reno release, the ATT free parts of which have been available for
anonymous ftp since the summer of 1990.

>And BSD netmasks are stored in per-interface information,
>not in the routing table.

This has also been fixed since the summer of 1990.
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
From: imp@solbourne.com (Warner Losh)
Subject: Re: getpeername...help
Organization: Solbourne, User Interface Group
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 19:38:51 GMT

In article <kuaco5INN72u@early-bird.think.com> barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin) writes:
>To convert an IP address into a host name, use gethostbyname().

Shouldn't that be gethostbyaddr?

Warner
-- 
Warner Losh		imp@Solbourne.COM
If it can't be done with Emacs, you are being too ambitious.
From: gsa@easyaspi.udev.cdc.com (gary s anderson)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Question on bind-socket
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:25:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: shamash.40625
Reply-To: gsa@easyaspi.udev.cdc.com (gary s anderson)

In article <1992Apr6.190727.3157@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>, thomson@hub.toronto.edu (Brian Thomson) writes:
|> In article <Apr.6.17.10.32.1992.6859@yoko.rutgers.edu> psirakis@yoko.rutgers.edu (Psirakis Alexander) writes:
|> >I want to bind a second socket descriptor (sockt2) to a port that is
|> >already assigned to another socket (sockt).
|> >I tried to use the setsockopt system call, with arguments SOL_SOCKET and
|> >SO_REUSEADDR. The setsockopt is correctly executed and I also test it
|> >with the getsockopt system call.
|> >But when I try to bind the same port address to the second socket descriptor 
|> >the bind system call fails ("address already in use").
|> 
|> SO_REUSEADDR does not mean what you think it means.
|> Don't let that worry you, though, few people do know what it is for.
|> 
|> Basically, SO_REUSEADDR lets you have two sockets with *similar*
|> local & foreign address bindings, but nothing will allow you to have
|> two *identically* bound sockets, and that is what you are trying to do.
|> -- 
|> 		    Brian Thomson,	    CSRI Univ. of Toronto
|> 		    utcsri!uthub!thomson, thomson@hub.toronto.edu

The constraint is two identical "connected" sockets not two identical
"bound" sockets.  See earlier posting on why the original code failed.

Please note this is not an endorsement of the original poster's technique,
rather, this is merely an attempt to properly identify the constraint.

If you are bored and would like a little test to shake-down your tcp
implementation:  bind two tcp sockets (SOCK_STREAM) to the same local
address (loopback works fine) and the same port (choose any free port), be
sure to select the SO_REUSEADDR on the socket used in the second bind.  Issue
a listen on one of the sockets and then issue a connect on the other
socket using the same address you used in the bind.  If you get an 
error on the connect, then your tcp implementation is OK.  If not .......
  
WARNING - you may not want to do this on a production system.........
From: car@public.BTR.COM (Carlos Rimola-Sarti  car@btr.com)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Screen Sharing via TCP/IP
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:03:23 GMT
Organization: Connective Strategies, Inc. (CSI).  Mountain View, California


I am looking for a "screen sharing" program that runs on an PC using
TCP/IP (e.g. FTP Software).  Something along the lines of Carbon Copy
would do.  The only packages that I have heard of all use serial lines.

Any help would be appreciated..

+---------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| Carlos Rimola-Sarti                   |         email: rimola@csisdn.com  |
| Connective Strategies Inc.            |                      car@btr.com  |
| ISDN PRI Connectivity Group           |         phone:      415-903-2585  |
+---------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
From: tksjmi@sybil.cs.Buffalo.EDU (JoAnn Illuzzi)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: MacTCP 2.0 availability?
Date: 17 Apr 92 19:54:27 GMT
Organization: State University of New York at Buffalo
Originator: tksjmi@sybil.cs.Buffalo.EDU


 Has anyone received MacTCP version 2.0?  I thought it had been
 announced as available a while back, but I only see MacTCP 1.1
 for single user and site license use.

 Input/clarification appreciated
 JoAnn
From: rex@nbc1.ge.com (Rex Espiritu)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: TCP/IP Terminal Servers
Keywords: TCP/IP Terminal Servers
Date: 10 Apr 92 19:29:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: nbc1.1992Apr10.192900.19246
Reply-To: espiritu@cgi.com (Rex Espiritu)
Organization: Carnegie Group, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA

Subject: TCP/IP Terminal Servers (possibly w/ LAT, too)

We're currently exploring and evaluating possible TCP/IP Terminal Servers
for our network.  We're just in the initial stages...  So, product literature
and/or recommendations/advantages/disadvantages would be greatly appreciated.
-- 
M. Rex Espiritu, Jr.                      Carnegie Group, Inc.
espiritu@cgi.com                          5 PPG Place
Voice: 412 642-6900 x233 FAX: -6906       Pittsburgh, PA  15222
From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: getpeername...help
Date: 10 Apr 1992 06:17:41 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: gandalf.think.com

In article <1992Apr9.204125.9519@ncsu.edu> pmarimut@eos.ncsu.edu (PERAM  MARIMUTHU) writes:
>How can I use the getpeername function to get the name of the machine
>that is connected to a socket. The following code returns the internet
>address (a.b.c.d) correctly but not the name.

As far as the socket library is concerned, the "name" of a TCP or UDP
socket is its IP address and port.

>What should I do next?

To convert an IP address into a host name, use gethostbyname().
-- 
Barry Margolin
System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com          {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
From: tony@suite.sw.oz.au (Tony McGrath)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: RDP (Reliable Datagram Protocol) implementation needed.
Date: 14 Apr 92 06:51:57 GMT
Organization: Softway Pty Ltd

I am looking for implementations of RDP for Unix, either socket
based or STREAMS. If you have such a beast, could you let me
know by email and/or send me a copy of it.

Also, I would be happy to see any code for the Loader Debugger Protocol
(RFC-909) as well.

Tony McGrath				Phone: +61 2 698 2322
Senior Software Engineer		Fax:   +61 2 699 9174
Softway Pty Ltd				Email: tony@softway.sw.oz.au
From: battle@cs.utk.edu (David Battle)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: mayonnaise
Date: 14 Apr 92 19:03:19 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - CS Department
NNTP-Posting-Host: thud.cs.utk.edu

In draft-ietf-rreq-iprouters-03.txt Philip Almquist seems to have allowed:

225   mayonnaise                                                             |
226                     A thick salad dressing or condiment made with oil    |
227                     and egg                                              |

What does this have to do with Requirements for IP Routers?

-David L. Battle
battle@cs.utk.edu
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
From: freed@tfs.com (Erik Freed)
Subject: VMTP/XTP availability
Organization: TRW Financial Systems
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 02:26:03 GMT

I am interested in the experiences of anyone who has implemented/ported/ or
written applications using VMTP. I am investigating this protocol for internal
use and while I know that it is an RFC and was I think proposed as a standard
for inclusion in the internet suite, I have heard very little other that the
original V kernel stuff as far as real world usage. It seems better that its
limited acceptance warrants. Am I missing something? 

I am also interested in xtp which seems to be owned or at least implemented
by a company called Protocol Engines that was going to use VLSI to speed
up some of these protocols. Any knowledge of this company or users of XTP
would also be welcome. 
	Thanks in advance,
-- 
		-Erik Freed (freed@tfs.com)
From: gsa@easyaspi.udev.cdc.com (gary s anderson)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Question on bind-socket
Date: 7 Apr 92 15:39:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: shamash.40604
Reply-To: gsa@easyaspi.udev.cdc.com (gary s anderson)

In article <Apr.6.17.10.32.1992.6859@yoko.rutgers.edu>, psirakis@yoko.rutgers.edu (Psirakis Alexander) writes:
|> 
|> 
|> I  am currently working on a term project concerning network programming.
|> 
|> I want to bind a second socket descriptor (sockt2) to a port that is
|> already assigned to another socket (sockt).
|> I tried to use the setsockopt system call, with arguments SOL_SOCKET and
|> SO_REUSEADDR. The setsockopt is correctly executed and I also test it
|> with the getsockopt system call.
|> But when I try to bind the same port address to the second socket descriptor 
|> the bind system call fails ("address already in use").
|> 
|> The critical code segment is the following:
|> 
|> 
|> 	sockt = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
|> 	bind(sockt, &addr, sizeof(addr), 0);
|> 	length = sizeof(addr);
|> 	getsockname(sockt, &addr, &length);
|> 	optval=1;
|> 	temp=sizeof(optval);
|> 	setsockopt(sockt,SOL_SOCKET,SO_REUSEADDR,(char *)&optval, sizeof(optval);
|> 	optval=0;
|> 	getsockopt(sockt,SOL_SOCKET,SO_REUSEADDR,(char *)&optval, (int *)&temp);
|> 	sockt2 = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
|> 	if (bind(sockt2, &addr, sizeof(addr)) != 0)
|> 	     ^  perror("Binding local socket");
|>              |
|>            here is the fail!!!
|> 
|> 
|> I appreciate any kind of help
|> Thank you
|> 
|> Alexander Psirakis
|> e-mail: psirakis@yoko.rutgers.edu
|> 
|>                 

In order to make your code work you must select the SO_REUSEADDR on
the second socket (sockt2).  

It is not clear what you intend to do with this feature, however, you
need to understand that all incoming data will only go to one of 
the sockets (depending on what level of BSD sockets you are running,
either all incoming data will go to the first one defined or all incoming
data will go to the last one defined).

If you had planned to use this for load-leveling across processes then
a fork operation is sufficient to make the socket available to 
subordinate processes.

If you are trying to set up an IPC mechanism then you need to bind
unique local ports (or possibly just unique IP addresses, if you are
writing a special multi-homing application) in order to pass information 
between the socket pair.
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
From: karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger)
Subject: LPD backend on a PC?
Organization: Macro Computer Solutions, Inc., Chicago, IL
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 04:42:00 GMT

Has anyone written a publically-available backend for LPD which runs on a
PC?  Ideally it would spool to local fixed disk storage and then despool to
the printer.

Source is preferred, of course...

--
Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
Data Line: [+1 312 248-0900] Anon. arch. (nuucp) 00:00-06:00 C[SD]T
Request file: /u/public/sources/DIRECTORY/README for instructions
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
From: thomson@hub.toronto.edu (Brian Thomson)
Subject: Re: Question on bind-socket
Organization: University of Toronto
Date: 6 Apr 92 23:07:28 GMT

In article <Apr.6.17.10.32.1992.6859@yoko.rutgers.edu> psirakis@yoko.rutgers.edu (Psirakis Alexander) writes:
>I want to bind a second socket descriptor (sockt2) to a port that is
>already assigned to another socket (sockt).
>I tried to use the setsockopt system call, with arguments SOL_SOCKET and
>SO_REUSEADDR. The setsockopt is correctly executed and I also test it
>with the getsockopt system call.
>But when I try to bind the same port address to the second socket descriptor 
>the bind system call fails ("address already in use").

SO_REUSEADDR does not mean what you think it means.
Don't let that worry you, though, few people do know what it is for.

Basically, SO_REUSEADDR lets you have two sockets with *similar*
local & foreign address bindings, but nothing will allow you to have
two *identically* bound sockets, and that is what you are trying to do.
-- 
		    Brian Thomson,	    CSRI Univ. of Toronto
		    utcsri!uthub!thomson, thomson@hub.toronto.edu
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
From: a008700@hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk (Lee Yiu Wah)
Subject: XMODEM SPECIFICATION WANTED
Organization: The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 04:59:35 GMT

Hi all,

I would like to know the xmodem specification. Does anybody know where I can
get it? 

Any help would be appreciated. 


Walter
walter@csc.mgate1.cuhk.hk.
From: nett@technix.mn.org (Jerry Nettleton)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
Subject: wanted: router/event-driven examples (X.25/X.PC)
Date: 9 Apr 92 04:15:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: technix.1992Apr09.041547.22740
Organization: Technix Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA

I was wondering if there were some examples of developing
message/packet router.  The project involves a embedded system and
uses X.PC (async version of X.25) for data communications.  Although
I've had a fair amount of experience in async communications, but wasn't
sure how to handle virtual sessions.  I assume it would need to be
event driven to handle error recovery.  Another area to consider is
the method used to establish a session with a task.  The following
diagram outlines what I had in mind.

       task1    task2    taskN
         |        |        |
         +--------+--------+
                  |
                router
                  |
                 X.PC

I know this setup is straight forward.  I have primarily developed
application programs that receive, process, and send data.  This
multitasking system is somewhat new for me and was looking for some
ideas or examples.  Any recommendations, source code examples, books,
or other information would be appreciated.

-- 
Jerry Nettleton
email: nett@technix.mn.org
       ...!uunet!cs.umn.edu!kksys!edgar!technix!nett
From: boender@dutiws.tudelft.nl (P.Boender.TI-tel-4593)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
Subject: Bi-directional protocols
Summary: Searching information on building a bi-directional protocol.
Date: 8 Apr 92 10:50:17 GMT
Organization: Delft University of Technology

Hello everybody!

I am posting this article for a friend of mine who doesn't have access to the 
net. As part of a course he is taking here, he is supposed to build a bi-direc-
tional communications protocol.

His inspiration for this comes from shareware protocols for the IBM PC, such as
BiModem and HS/Link.

His qiestion is: does anybody know of a source where he could get information as
to how to implement such a protocol. He was thinking of modifying Xmodem or a 
similar protocol.

I will forward any answer/suggestions/tips/etc you could give me, either here 
or at my email address.

Thanks, 
Eelco.

boender@dutiws.tudelft.nl
From: turbo@tpki.toppoint.de (Torsten Stein)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
Subject: Information about CRMA ?
Date: 9 Apr 92 15:59:30 GMT
Organization: Toppoint Mailbox e.V.


Hello everybody!

I'm searching further information about CRMA (cyclic-reservation
multiple-access), an access scheme for high-speed local and metro-
politan area networks.

Already known are two articles from M. Mehdi Nassehi.

Please reply via e-mail.

-- 
Torsten Stein		turbo@tpki.toppoint.de
2300 Kiel 14
From: vlachopo@nunki.usc.edu (Panagiotis Vlachopoulos)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
Subject: SRP - CRC
Date: 7 Apr 1992 20:45:45 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: nunki.usc.edu
Summary: Trivial but valuable...
Keywords: SRP -CRC


Hi Netters,
I am searching for two things:

(1)     A simulation of the Selective Repeat Protocol written in ANY
computer language. It will be used to calculate and plot the efficiency
of the protocol vs. buffer size. (I know it's in Tanenbaum, but I'd
rather have it in anything else than Pascal).
(2)     A piece of code that calculates CRC's for a given generator.

As I'm not reading this group I would like to have any responses
sent to panosv@theseas.ntua.gr
Thanx in advance :-)
Organization: Youngstown State University
Date: Tuesday, 14 Apr 1992 13:10:20 EDT
From: Vincent M. Tkac (SR) <SR190504@ysub.ysu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
Subject: ISDN

Greetings,

   I am looking for an up to date description of ISDN can anyone suggest
some books, articles or papers?

Thanks in advance,

Vincent M. Tkac
savince@macs.ysu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.misc
From: rbutler@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Randy Butler)
Subject: Lightweight Protocols
Organization: Nat'l Ctr for Supercomp App (NCSA) @ University of Illinois
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 21:26:09 GMT

Can anyone help me in traking down information on lightweight communication
protocols for very reliable networks?

-- 

Randy Butler :-)
NCSA
Xref: sparky comp.protocols.misc:351 comp.dcom.modems:6667