HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: xu@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu (Hao Xu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse (Re: 6.4, green card, freedom...)
Date: 13 Apr 92 23:49:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: ucdavis.12206
Reply-To: xu@toadflax.UUCP (Hao Xu)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis

In article <29E9E603.23676@noiro.acs.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
>+
>+	Third, I have tried to get a green card for myself thru 6.4 blood.
>		 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>	Should be: 
>
>	Third, I have NOT tried to get a green card for myself thru 6.4 blood.

Shannon, you must be drunk then. People say "one tells the truth when
drunk" :-)). So don't try to deny it. We all know you tried.

Hao
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: zzuo@iastate.edu (Zhiqi Zuo)
Subject: Re : Train from Naking ...
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 00:23:51 GMT


In article <122755@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> tcheung@ramius.ocf.llnl.gov writes:
>In article <1992Apr16.193348.12508@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> yzg9890@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (just call me joe ) writes:
>->tcheung@ramius.ocf.llnl.gov writes:
>->
>->>It seems like domestic air carrier is notorious for some reason.  But I
>->>took it once.  Sure the plane was small, airport was smaller than a bus
>->>terminal in US, and the worse part is that service was bad.  However,
>->>I don't expect service to be good at train stations either. 
>->
>->   You are absolutely right!
>->
>->>So can anyone tell me what's so bad about taking domestic air carrier as
>->>opposed to taking trains?
>->
>->   Nervous! For several times, I was told to write down what I need to
>->   say to my family when I was on the china domestic air. I don't think
>->   you need to do the same thing in the train or bus.
>
>Why nervous? Does anyone have any statistics on plane crash rates?
>
>--
>Terry Cheung
>tcheung@ramius.ocf.llnl.gov

One of my friends in Guangdong survived more than 10 times . Maybe he is luckier .
  I didn't feel stange , Every Time I saw him alive .
Another friend risked three or four times in little planes from Hubei to Nanking (?),
  he is happily with his family .
Still other two students here were alive ( at least two hours ago ) , after they
had the experiences of taking the plane in China more than 20 times , and 6 times
respectively .

PS : I will take the same risk , and put the parachute away .
From: srzhang@mth.msu.edu (Shuren Zhang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: one coner of my Beijing life (follow-up to "red card" discussion)
Date: 15 Apr 92 20:33:38 GMT
Organization: Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University

In article <29EB5FA9.132@noiro.acs.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
>
>
>I had many contacts at all levels varying from the bottom (farmers) to top 
>(names you can see on People's Daily frequently) during that time.  I do 
>NOT agree with those big boys politically but I was willing to and able to 
>maintain a fairly good relationship with them.  As you may know, some so 
>called "big professors" at some big universities are totally shit and 
>Fan(food)Tong(can), no better than the big CCP guys at all.  You can imagine 
>how I could work well with those guys.  Then, I was in trouble.  Might be a 
>surpurise to you, during the trouble days, some CCP leaders even provided me 
>with protection (of course, on personal basis).  Facing some professors' 


  Shannon seems to mean that those professors had nothing to do with CCP. 
You are wrong.   Those professors had CCP memberships and had been tamed by
CCP to do evil to people.   CCP has made morales of Chinese intelectuals
go down.  

                                    ----- S.R.Z     
         
>attack, I did NOT low my head, and finally we all win some and lose some.  
>As the result of this, I became jobless.  But, do NOT Tong/Qing/ me, I made 
>lots of money while I was jobless!  Becasue I had more money than those 
>professors, they hated me more, and tried harder to screw me. For example, 
>when People's Telecommunication Press tried to publish a book written by me 
>"Computer Network Architecture and Principles", some professors tried to stop.
           
>
>shannon
>-------
>
>
>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: yzg9890@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (joe )
Subject: Re: SCC Unsolved Mystery.
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 18:13:40 GMT

zhuh@athena.mit.edu (Hui Zhu) writes:

>|>  I can forgive him as a son-in-law
>|> of Li Peng. You and I might not be able to do that in his
>|> position.

>Son-in-law of Li Peng is not a crime.  Why you forgive him? 

     Good point!  I don't like Mr.Li Peng because of June 4th, but there
     is nothing to do with any of his relatives.

     joe
From: hua@disuns2.epfl.ch
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Chinese Nationals Came Before 4/1/90
Keywords: YES
Date: 12 Apr 92 08:16:19 GMT
Organization: EPFL

>|>Since CSSs don't want to go back, "a protection law" = "a prohibition law".
>|>Neat, isn't it?

>Absolutely wrong. A protection law is an extention of right while a
>prohibition law is a restriction of right. Furthermore, not every CSS
>want to stay here forever, a friend of mine is planning to go back.
>So you used wrong assumption and a wrong equation, no wonder you get the
>wrong conclution. Sorry, exam not passed :-))

Your explanation is the meaning on the surface. Thinking a little bit deeper,
what are the meaning and effects behaind. Politics is not math. logic.
Red can be black. 1 can equal 2.

Most of CSS want to stay. Even if there is a "a prohibition law", some CSS will
also go back. For China, in view of CSS's stay or leave, taking CSS as a whole, the two laws are the same. A protection law is a clever one. 
There can be two explanations. It can really be protections of CSS. It can also be
a blow to China. I am not sure what was in Bush's head.

>|>Except those political elites. Since Deng wants economic reform,
>|>not political one.

>What happens if CSS want both?

Most CSSs are scientist, engineers not politicians.
Even if China achieves democratic political regime, a free market economy, will all the CSS go back if they can stay?

KF-HUA
From: doc@ecepck.ece.arizona.edu.local (doc)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: CCP did not order any massacre!!
Date: 12 Apr 92 07:56:13 GMT


 
In article <1992Apr12.074121.27117@cs.yale.edu>, horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes:
|> <So you think it is CCP's mistake to order 6/4
|> <massacre?
|> 
|> The CCP did *NOT* order any "massacre".  Period.  Don't bandy the word `CCP'
|> about so freely.
 
      Now donkey Scott changes from CCP apologist to CCP defender. 
So according to this donkey, on JUNE 4 of 1989, students in TAM simply
asked to be killed.  
 
      How glorious the CCP is! Students marched to TAM and stayed there,
hunger strike, then demanded CCP to shoot themselves!  Does the Sun come
out from west side??
From: mjln_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Mikeey J. Lin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Xue4 ran2 de lyu4 ka3 (Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse)
Date: 14 Apr 92 20:44:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: galileo.1992Apr14.204457.8926
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Apr14.074606.24591@cs.yale.edu> horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes:

>In article <1992Apr14.023430.16937@ulowell.ulowell.edu>, cshi@cs.ulowell.edu (Chunde Shi) writes:
><[I, Scott Horne, write:]

><This is serous, but partially true charge! the motivations of most people who
><joined demo were mostly pure, sincere!

>I agree.  But the guys who organised the demonstration (and yes, it was
>organised) weren't sincere in the least.

>					--Scott

	Gee.. what do you know about their intentions? Were you there?
Did you oppose their demonstrations? Why do you support the government
even when you knew they were wrong in their violent response against
the peaceful student demostrators? Do you not see what happened?
Think real hard before answering, don't lie to yourself.

							Mikeey


>-- 
>Scott Horne                               ...!{harvard,cmcl2,decvax}!yale!horne
>horne@cs.Yale.edu      SnailMail:  Box 7196 Yale Station, New Haven, CT   06520
>203 436-1848                Residence:  Rm 1848 Silliman College, New Haven, CT
>Shao2shan1 sheng1 de tai4yang2 yong3 bu2 luo4!
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: kniaz@cat6.cs.wisc.edu (Joel Kniaz)
Subject: Re: _Paradise Lost_ and _Witch Hunt in Prague_
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison -- Computer Sciences Dept.
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 17:38:57 GMT

In article <9204101523.AA23322@sdcc3.UCSD.EDU> jzhang@sdcc3.UCSD.EDU writes:
>	``But there are other, more serious and dangerous symptoms: hatred
>among nationalities, suspicion, racism, even signs of fascism. Vicious
>demagoguery, intrigue and deliberate lying, politicking, an
>unrestrained, unheeding struggle for purely particular interests, a
>hunger for power, unadulterated ambition, fanaticism of every
>imagineable kind, new and unprecedented varieties of robbery, the rise
>of different mafias, (and) the general lack of tolerance, understanding,
>taste, moderation, reason.''

	Hmmm... from an American point of view, this stuff all looks
	pretty normal.  I guess Czechoslovakia has finally caught up
	to the United States... ;^>

     ______________________________________________________________________
    / "Lo, Though I walk through the valley in the shadow of death,       /
    \    I fear not!                                        ______________\
    /  For I am the biggest son-of-a-bitch in the valley." / My favorite  /
    \______________________________________________________\ expression...\
    / Joel Kniaz   kniaz@garfield.cs.wisc.edu  kniaz@jomby /      __i     /
    \______________________________________________________\_yiLballe(Mu)_\
							
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: wangf@unixg.ubc.ca (Frank Wang)
Subject: Re: China & HK News
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 18:44:24 GMT

In article <9204072344.aa00392@bat.UUCP> newsdis%bat@CSD.HKU.HK (News Distributor) writes:
>Source : South China Morning Post
>Date   : 3/4th April, 1992
>
>Corr. Addr.:
> bat!kwchan1@csd.hku.hk
>
>Subscription: 
> bat!newsreq@csd.hku.hk
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>Macleod defends new figures on airport cost
>One third of delegates refuse to approve the Three Gorges project
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Sichuan Governor Mr Zhang Haoruo, who voted
>for the project, said he supported the plan although the
>majority of Sichuanese were against the project.
>

Is this the Sichuan people's representive?
He is more like the central gevonment's representive.
Interesting!

F. Wang
From: bbs@medsys.rn.com (Public BBS System)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Don't be misled
Date: 15 Apr 92 03:04:15 GMT
Reply-To: bbs@medsys.UUCP (Public BBS System)
Organization: Med-Systems, Kingsport, Tennessee

In article <9204092115.AA09584@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu> xu@CS.UCDAVIS.EDU (Hao Xu) writes:
>
>by Ding Shu. BTW, I find Scott always try to cover up all disasters CCP made
>and make up some merits for CCP :-)) Not strange to me at all. :-))
>

He may not be able to do it for long. Now that the USSR has broken up and
China has become the "only big bad guy", it is conceivable that China's
integrity will receive more and more challenge. The independence
movement in Xin Jiang, Xi Zang, Taiwan, Hong Kong and inner Mongolia
will get, if not already has gotten, a boost. CCP may not be able to
survive the turmoil and probably will soon disappear.

Chou1
From: horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Fast Gouraud Shading Needed!
Keywords: joe
Date: 9 Apr 92 19:53:43 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.1992Apr9.195343.17844
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Computer "Science" Dept, Yale University

In article <13894@star.cs.vu.nl>, mvdvalk@cs.vu.nl (Valk v/d M) writes:
<
<S. Horne, you are the moron! Somebody posting one (1) article about some
<shading algorithm, your complaining about it has increased the so called
<"useless" postings to about five. Thank you for wasting so much bandwidth!

MY article increased the "useless" postings by one.  Subsequent articles
increased them by more.

					--Scott

-- 
Scott Horne                               ...!{harvard,cmcl2,decvax}!yale!horne
horne@cs.Yale.edu      SnailMail:  Box 7196 Yale Station, New Haven, CT   06520
203 436-1848                Residence:  Rm 1848 Silliman College, New Haven, CT
ZANG4 HAN4 YI4 JIA1 / GONG4 JIAN4 ZHONG1HUA2!
From: yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh)
Subject: 6.4, green card, freedom, money, et al.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Organization: Netix Communications, Inc.
Date: 11 Apr 92 02:00:23 GMT

nothing new in this msg, all the voices have been made by me on scc several
times:

1. India and Mexico have more "freedoms" than China, why didn't they
   go there?

2. In China, people cannot pursue what they want by people themselves,
   because of CCP.  Hey!  In the US, there is no CCP in power, why don't
   they get green cards by themselves rather than thru "I don't like to
   go home, becasue those CCP guys will bet me".

3. maybe CCP owe your parents something, but that's the deal between
   CCP and your parents.  The issue is: did YOU return what you owe
   to CCP as yet?

4. China become democratic first, or you go home to join the construction
   of a democratic system for China first?

5. These "6.4 green cards" shall be called as "red cards" becasue they
   reflect 6.4. victims' blood.

6. Well, i understand that they might get some sort "street freedoms" after 
   they get the "red cards", but these freedoms are built based on the
   loss of other people's freedoms.  Because more and more people in 
   China will be having more difficulty to get out.

   I mean "street freedom" by " you can criticize George Bush on the streets,
   but you don't get a shit after you practise this piece of freedom"

7. too few people like to donate their blood, but too many like to
   sell blood.  The only way to resolve the difference is to CREATE
   more death, so that they can stay on their blood 
   resell business.   Believe me, if there is another 6.4, they will
   ask the White House to offer them citizenship immediately.  So, those
   people are looking forward to see bigger 6.4s.

   In order to stay on business, coffin store always hope more and more
   people will die.

8. Having been HDs (Homeless Dogs) for years, to home themselves in the
   US is not a bad idea.

9. Having been HJs (Han Jan) for years, to adhere themselves to the
   YangGuiZi is their final choice anyway.  This way, they will no longer
   have to stay as Arh-Q or Little-D, at least, they can be Jia YangGuiZi.

10. I myself came to the US before 6.4.  But don't forget my voice on 6.5 of
    1989.  "Don't cry for your Chinese coffins be4 the White House".


shannon
-------
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong
From: hyx1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Harry Y Xu)
Subject: Re: When is Qing1 Ming2?
Keywords: Calendar
Organization: Columbia University, New York City
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 03:06:52 GMT

In article <wangf.703124247@kynok.ucs.ubc.ca> wangf@unixg.ubc.ca (Frank Wang) writes:
>In <1992Apr12.223842.21974@descartes.waterloo.edu> cyeh@descartes.waterloo.edu (Woody) writes:
>>	In Chinese calendar, 24 Jie2 Qi4 are based on sun's motion (I know 
>>how solar system works. Don't be picky on this please.).
>>	Qing1 Ming2 is belong to 12 Jie2. So it is always located on April
>>5th. But this year is a leap year, so it become April 4th.

	Therefore, Qing1 Ming2, which is associated with ancestor worship,
	happens to be on April Fool's Day.   :)

>Thanks a lot!  Now, the fool has more q's.  I thought Yin1 li4 is 
>lunar canlender (actually, a net pointed two weeks ago the yin li---
>Chinese calender is neither lunar nor solar calender) and yang2 li4 is
>solar calender.  Now, forget the terms lunar or solar, the yin1 li4 and
>yang2 li4 really confuse me.  I don't understand why Jan. 1 in yin li 
>varies a lot in yang li but qin ming counted from yin li does no change
>in yang li unless in leap year. 

	A person who asks question and learns can hardly be a fool.
  Yin1 Li4 is the Chinese lunar calendar.  (Yin1 meaning dark as at night)
	Chinese lunar year is divided into 12 months of 30 or 29 days.
	No 31. Therefore, an extra months are added at regular intervals.
  Yang2 Li4 is the Julian (after Juleus Ceacer)(or Gregorian, after Pope
	Gregory XIII).  It's the solar calendar, official in West.  (Yang2
	means "sun")  It's perfection accredited to the Roman Catholic 
	Church (Gregory XIII).  The average year on this calendar is half
	a minute longer than the earth's orbital period.  But, it takes
	more than 3,000 years to build up to an extra day.  :)
  Remember: "Jie2 Qe4 are based on the sun's motion".  Each of them can 
	fall on three possible days on the Solar calendar.  Qing1 Ming2,
	for instance can for on April 4, 5, or 6.
  Chinese New Year (Jan 1 on lunar cal.) is always between mid Jan. and 
	mid Feb. because it's at the first new moon after the sun enters 
	Aquarius.

====================================>.sig <====================================
  Harry Xu  (KB2LHA)	   Internet:  hyx1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
 *Columbia University Amateur Radio Club (CUARC-<>-W2AEE)  *Founded, 1913*
 *The American Radio Relay League:  Amateur Radio >>---> A National Resource
 *New York Road Runners Club  -&-  Columbia University Road Runners Club 
  ::::::"Go run.  Nothing else can make you feel as good as making love."  --ME
====================================> end <====================================
From: barry@falcon.axion.bt.co.uk (Barry Au_Yeung)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: LOOKING FOR AMY LIU(OR LAU)...
Date: 14 Apr 92 11:33:30 GMT
Reply-To: barry@falcon.axion.bt.co.uk (Barry Au_Yeung)
Organization: British Telecom Research Labs




Hi, everyone!!! My name is Barry Au-Yeung and I am
looking for my friend Amy Liu(or Lau in Cantonese).

She is a Taiwanese girl. She has been in England two years
ago, and now she is studying psychology (???) at
some college in either Washington DC or Washington
state (I am not pretty sure!!!).

If anybody know her, please, please tell her that I would
like to contact her.

Or, if anybody know her address, please send it to me by
email.

Thanks everyone and hope you guys have a nice time in
Easter.

Bye for now.
From: iad@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Ivan A Derzhanski)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Holy
Date: 10 Apr 92 19:00:06 GMT
Organization: Centre for Cognitive Science, Edinburgh, UK

In article <44206@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> superfly@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Jake) writes:

[lots of stuff about the emanation of the Holy devinity [_sic_] etc.]

I liked the header of this article.  The "Organisation:" line deserves
special attention.

< From: superfly@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Jake)
< Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
< Subject: Holy
< Message-ID: <44206@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
< Date: 7 Apr 92 12:51:11 GMT
< Sender: news@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
< Organization: Darkness should prevail, should it not?
< Lines: 13

So do the "Office:" line and the "Universe:" line in the author's
finger image.

< 101 /home/user9/iad> f superfly@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
< [mentor.cc.purdue.edu]
< Login name: superfly                    Real name: Jake G. Zanger
< Office: State Of Bliss, xxx-6666        Home phone: 317-SUP-FFLY
< Directory: /userd/superfly              Shell: /usr/local/bin/tcsh
< Universe: Jesus Christ
< Member of group: stuprsac
< Last login Fri Apr 10 13:19 on ttypr from sage
< New mail received Thu Apr  9 10:12:55 1992
<      unread since Fri Apr 10 13:28:54 1992
< No Plan.
-- 
---- --- -- -  Long Live the Rose and the Heather!  - -- --- ----
Ivan A Derzhanski   (iad@cogsci.ed.ac.uk;  iad@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu)
* Centre for Cognitive Science,  2 Buccleuch Place,  Edinburgh EH8 9LW,  UK
* Cowan House, Pollock Halls, 18 Holyrood Park Road, Edinburgh EH16 5BD, UK
From: superfly@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Jake)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Holy
Date: 7 Apr 92 12:51:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: mentor.44206
Organization: Darkness should prevail, should it not?

The beloved people for whome God sacrificed his only begotten son !!!

The darkness in the world caused by the granted power of evil will be only

what Jesus may conquer.... The emanation of the Holy devinity is the ultimate,

primary weapon with what we know where we start to strive, struggle for our

brightened future !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

God will punish all those who commit any forms of crime against the 

people, nation that s/he are designated to serve, love with loyalty....
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: cs921022@juno.ariel.yorku.ca (Ming He)
Subject: Any site on Internet in China?
Originator: cs921022@juno.ariel.yorku.ca
Organization: York University, Toronto, Canada
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 09:01:16 GMT

Well, who's there can tell us whether there is any site of mainland China
linked to Internet?

Any help is highly appreciated.

I believe many other Chinese guys are also interested in this matter.


Ming
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne)
Subject: Re: Ugly Chinese
Organization: Computer "Science" Dept, Yale University
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 22:15:00 GMT

In article <skmekINN7c0@agate.berkeley.edu>, river@garnet.berkeley.edu writes:
<
<          These include those are against the bill that protects 
<          Chinese students and scholars.

Protects them from what?

					--Scott

-- 
Scott Horne                               ...!{harvard,cmcl2,decvax}!yale!horne
horne@cs.Yale.edu      SnailMail:  Box 7196 Yale Station, New Haven, CT   06520
203 436-1848                Residence:  Rm 1848 Silliman College, New Haven, CT
Shao2shan1 sheng1 de tai4yang2 yong3 bu2 luo4!
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: hyx1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Harry Y Xu)
Subject: *IMPORTANT* please consider
Keywords: flame
Reply-To: hyx1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Harry Y Xu)
Organization: Columbia University, New York City
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 07:32:11 GMT

Just a suggestion.

	I see too much garbage worthless stuff floating around here.
I believe the purpose of this group is to provide for exchange of valuable
information and ideas.
	We should be rid of unimformative inputs which waste our valuable 
time and energy.
	I suggest that all of us should post only FACTS, legitimate CONCERNS,
and OPINIONS accompanyed by supporting FACTS.
	How about let's ignore anything of no intellectually value or
intellectual stimulation.  Can we try it?!

	Anybody can put up a long essay to express his/her emotions after
reading every single line here.  Some people actually post worthless remarks
for virtually every line.   Since just about all of us don't know each
other personally, I don't think anybody would give a damn about anybody else's
emotional state.  Just reading the FACTS should be stimulating enough on
emotion and thinking without any "help/sharing" from anybody else.
     Some obnoxious netters (I'm not suggesting they exist.) might get a lot 
of satisfaction from getting flamed and being frequently metioned/referred to
because this might be their only opportunity to receive such attention.
Let's experiment with ignoring them.  Just don't take anything personally.
It'll take some time to see any result tho.

Thanks a ton,
--Harry (kb2lha),  anticipating tranquillity,
From: hao@slipknot.mit.edu (Cindy Hao)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Xue4 ran2 de lyu4 ka3 (Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse)
Date: 14 Apr 92 01:06:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: slipknot.hao.703213578
Organization: Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology


>Certainly.  These "d-fighters" deliberately provoked a violent response
>from the Chinese government three years ago so that they could get their
>_xue4 ran2 de lyu4 ka3_.  They'd do it again if they had the chance.

>					--Scott

Perhaps.  So I think it's better to let them get their green cards and 
stay in the US.  This way, they will do less damage to China.

					--Cindy Hao



-- 
hao@slipknot.mit.edu 	        (617)253-7458