HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bittle@niktow.canisius.edu (Jason Bittle)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: fumble out of bounds
Date: 29 Sep 92 16:37:31 GMT
Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo NY. 14208

In article <69316@hydra.gatech.EDU>, gt6390a@prism.gatech.EDU (BERNSTEIN) writes:
> At what yard line is a fumble placed if it goes out of bounds?  I already 
> know that it belongs to the team that last had posession before it went out,

It goes to the spot of the fumble, either behind the line, at the line, or
over the line.  If it is determined that you fumbled it on purpose, you are
assessed a 10 yard penalty from the spot of the foul.  (i.e. Young's fumble
out of bounds in the Bills - 49ers game).  I am not sure if you lose the down
on that penalty.


-- 
ciao,                             
Jason Bittle (bittle@niktow.canisius.edu) 
(a.k.a. Pillsbury Dough Boy )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: pretenders
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 20:44:05 GMT

In article <BvM5tw.3sq@acsu.buffalo.edu> v069qqqc@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Mike C.) writes:
>Once again, the Bills show how they can beat up on weak teams,
>only to lose when it really counts. The pattern holds true: they
>win the first few games against weak teams, then lose a big game
>against a strong team. Now they'll 'get their act together' for
>
Although I agree with your point, I have to differ in you lumping
ALL of the Bills previous wins againt "weak" teams. The Niners are
hardly a weak team and they just happened to lose on one particular
Sunday.
>a few wins against some more winless teams, and breeze into the playoffs.
>But I sincerely hope they don't make it too far this year, because
>they don't have it. They're an average team who catch teams off guard
>with their trickery on offense, and steal some wins against some good teams.
>
>But then when it counts, the real Bills show up: the defense who can't
>stop anything, the offense led by an overrated QB who ***CHOKES***
>whenever the pressure is on (see SB XXV, XXVI). This team will never
>amount to everything, and I'm sick of watching them blow every big game 
>they play.
>
>At least we could depend on a home win in the past... now even that is
>gone. I refuse to follow this team anymore.
>
>Congrats Miami. Take the division, take the championship. Please. We 
>in Buffalo don't want it anymore.
>
>Mike C
>very fickle ex-Bills fan

Good, a fan is able to see the Bills for what they really are.
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "Fact are facts and will not disappear on account of 
   your likes."  -   Jawaharlal Nehru
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Dolphins Eat the Bills for Lunch...
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 03:18:40 GMT

In article <16876127B6.TSTEEGM3@ua1vm.ua.edu> TSTEEGM3@ua1vm.ua.edu (Tom Steegmann) writes:
> 
> 
>    Well, I watched the Bills get the shit beat out of them today.  It
>really sucked hard. I have to give a certain amount of credit to the
>'Fins.  They looked great, and could  beat any pussy NFC east team if
>they continue to play that way.  At any rate, I have a few observations
>to share.  First, I think it is time for a new coach at Buffalo.  Every
>time the Bills get in a big game, they are outcoached. The only reason
>that they win so many games is the talent that they have.  Marv has
>had a great record over the years, but I think its time for a change.
>Where the fuck is Buddy Ryan?
>    Next, I remeber the last time the 'Fins beat the Bills.  It was in game
>3 of the 1989-1990 season. It was just as bad as this, like 33-3 or
>something. What happened after that is that they pulled together and
>played great the rest of the year, beating the Eagles and the Giants
>in the process.  I hope that this can serve as the catalyst for them again
>and hopefully they'll kick some ass.  All of a sudden, the Raiders
>(next week) and the Colts (2 weeks) dont look so horrible anymore. Fuck!
>   I'd also like to add that Miami is my second favorite team (after
>the Bills!) so I wont cry too long tonight.  I'm just glad that I'm not
>home (Buffalo) tonight!
> 
>Tom Steegmann
>We just werent better than you today.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hell, the Bills TOTAL of 10 points, was tied with the
Green Bay's score. Every other team scored 13 plus points.
Based on these facts, the Bills were at the bottom of the barrel.

-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "Fact are facts and will not disappear on account of 
   your likes."  -   Jawaharlal Nehru
From: aj639@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Cox)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Miami-Buffalo-San Fran
Date: 5 Oct 1992 12:06:46 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aj639@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Cox)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, rfedkiw@crenshaw.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) says:

>As usual the Bills cut their own throats.... they did it last year
Oh, give me a break!  Typical Duffalo response.  

>Unfortunately Miami has a cake schedule and could go 13-3...
And Duffalo has had an easy schedule till now.

Mike
-- 
Okay, look for AmoNER Disk #4 on: (And, AMOS PRO is coming SOON!)
ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (128.174.5.59) in /amiga/amoner
nic.funet.fi (128.214.6.100) in /pub/amiga/programming/amos
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: tak@tazboy.jpl.nasa.gov (Tom Kreitzberg)
Subject: More meaningless NFC East stats...
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 01:57:13 GMT


Here's something for Eagles fans to think about when the afterglow
of Monday night's game fades: the PF-PA totals over the last ten
quarters of play for the Eagles and the Cowboys. The Eagles scored
31 against Dallas, 30 against the Broncos, and, what, 10 or so in
the second half against Phoenix? Against them, Dallas got 7, Denver
0, and the Cardinals maybe 10? So I'll guess it's 71-24 at the
worst. Now, the Cowboys scored 7 against the Eagles, was it 24
against the Cardinals, and nothing in the second half against the
Giants, while giving up 31, 'bout 20(?), and 28 points, respectively.
Which is, um, 31-78.

Meaningless? Of course; add two more quarters and Dallas is at
65-78. But Dallas has only played exceptionally well the first
game and a half this season, and, as the old saying goes, you're
only as good as your last two and a half games.

None of which means I think the Eagles will have an easy time of
it in Dallas.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: xtifr@netcom.com (Chris Waters)
Subject: Re: Ten best rated QB performances ever
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 06:23:15 GMT

In <1992Oct4.013957.2244@netcom.com> mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:

>In article <73FI03G59bue00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend) writes:

>>In article <92276.2137463ZASIB3@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU> 3ZASIB3@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU writes:

>>>I don't remember the exact date but after trailing the '49ers all game long
>>>Roger Staubach ran them into the ground to advance in the playoffs in about
>>>1971 or '72, maybe '73.  [...]

>>I believe you are referring to the famous game in which the 49ers led the 
>>Cowboys something like 27-10 with about four minutes left in the game and 
>>Roger got on a roll and the Cowboys wound up taking the game 31-27. The 
>>Cowboys recovered two consecutive onside kicks in the last two minutes of 
>>that game. I don't think the game was at Candlestick, though, as Dallas was 
>>11-3 that year and would have earned home-field advantage against a 9-5 SF 
>>team.  It was one of the great all-time comebacks, made all that more famous 
>>because it was in  the playoffs. 

>It's me again...

>The final score was 30-28.  The Niners had gone 8-5-1 to win their third
>straight NFC West title.  And yes, the game was in Candlestick.

Er, if it took place in '72 or '73, wouldn't it have been at Kezar, not
Candlestick?  When did the Niners move, anyway--I used to know, but
can't dredge the memory up right now.
-- 
Chris Waters    | the insane don't | NOBODY for President!
xtifr@netcom.COM| need disclaimers | Because Nobody's perfect!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hall@sweetpea.jsc.nasa.gov (Philip Hall 283-4031)
Subject: Re: 49ers/Saints
Organization: McDonnell Douglas Space Systems Company
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 16:52:34 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.201530.13928@sequent.com>, newson@sequent.com (Newson) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep30.184810.15204@cs.tulane.edu> buckley@cs.tulane.edu (James Buckley) writes:
|> >In article <nq+pklf.mzimmers@netcom.com> mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:
|> >>In article <1992Sep29.032441.28570@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com> marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com writes:
|> >>
|> >>>To the refs' credit : the Saints' linebackers got called for offsides
|> >>>several times in the game, deservedly so (i.e., even *I* screamed
|> >>>"***O-F-F-S-I-D-E-S***" as the play started). And I think they got away
|> >>
|> >>I agree that the officiating sucked big time, but I wonder if those
|> >>apparent but uncalled offsides were optical illusions on the TV viewer.
|> >>Given that the Niners' linemen couldn't hear the snapcount, and that
|> >>they can't watch the center as easily as a LB can, it's quite possible
|> >>that the Aints' LBs were simply getting jumps on the ball faster than
|> >>the Niners' line were.  To a TV viewer who can't really see the center,
|> >>this would look like offsides, as the LB is across the line of scrimmage
|> >>before you see the OL move.
|> >>
|> >
|> >"optical illusions" ... ha ha ha ... gimme a break!  I find it interesting
|> >that the Niner's win and people (and I use that term loosely) are still
|> >whining about this and that.  (maybe this is fallout from the Bills game :-)
|> >I've heard of sore losers, but "sore winners"???  Oh well, till we meet
|> >again ...
|> 
|> Flip this around a bit. The Saints win dispite terrible officiating such as
|> we witnessed Sunday night. I find it hard to believe that you would sit on
|> your hands and not complain a bit. This complaining is justified, the ref's
|> suck!
|> 
|> -newson
|> 
|> >
|> >
|> >- Jim
|> >GO SAINTS!!!

The officiating was certainly terrible but the 49ers were the beneficiaries of
some of the bad calls, too. In the game I watched, the Saints got called twice
for offsides when they simply got a great jump on the ball. Those calls, and a
non-call on an obvious clipping penalty (a 49ers receiver not only hit a Saints
defensive back directly in the back but threw a forearm into his helmet to boot)
kept a 49er drive alive that gave them three points and prevented the game from
most likely going into OT.

So quit whining, we'll see you in San Francisco in November. If we find a
running game by then, the result will be much different.

Philip Hall
Geaux SAINTS!!
Organization: Freshman, MCS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
From: andy@misha.Central.Sun.COM (Andy Knipp SE Andersen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Harbaugh Gets Ass Chewing
Date: 6 Oct 92 13:15:18 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: andy@misha.Central.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.152.10.9

In article 92Oct6140038@quip.eecs.umich.edu, billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
> In article <ld3jv2INN959@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM> mre@teal.Eng.Sun.COM (Mike Eisler) writes:
> 
> 
> The play that he audibled out of was a fly pattern, not a run.  Ditka was
> pissed because he said to *not audible at all* during that game because of
> the noise.

Neal Anderson did not hear the audible.  This surprises me,  since the Vikes were
down by 20 at the time.  It did start the avalanche.  


---
Andy Knipp                    |
Sun Microsystems              | The secret to success is sincerity,
Chicago Loop District         | once you can fake that,  you have it made.
andy@sunloop.central.sun.com  |
From: tehyang@phakt.usc.edu (Teh Kao Yang)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Finally...Jackson's outta here!!!
Date: 30 Sep 1992 00:53:30 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: phakt.usc.edu

In article <1992Sep29.213440.7296@cerritos.edu> jacobs@cerritos.edu writes:
>
>That's what allthe Rams fans said after they got rid of Dickerson, and look
>what happened to them!!
>

Uh-uh. Greg Bell did a very good job at running back. I think he was one of
the top rushers in the NFL in the 88-89 season, and he was averaging 15TDs
a season. The Rams really didn't start to decline until after 89' when they 
lost Greg Bell. 

-Tehkao
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lej@pdn.paradyne.com (Leo James)
Subject: Re: NFC Central
Organization: AT&T Paradyne, Largo, Florida
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 22:03:16 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.042621.28301@zip.eecs.umich.edu> sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Eric Sybesma) writes:
>	The Bears will fade and so will Tampa Bay.  The Vikings and
>the Lions are the only teams that have the talent to win the division,
>but the Lions will have to get Barry running better to get some W's.

Maybe.  Maybe not.  The team I am looking at here in Tampa is young (but
not too young), hungry,  talented, and pretty close to believing that it
can achieve anything it sets its mind to.
--
+---------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
|Leopold E. James     | "A heart, a soul, AND | AT&T Paradyne         |
|ph: (813) 530-8425   |  a mind are terrible  | P.O. Box 2826, LG-132,|
|lej@pdn.paradyne.com |  things to waste."    | Largo, FL 34649 (USA) |
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 17:45:36 -0400 
From: Christopher Glenn Huegle <ch44+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: O/D ratings

I didn't think that the yardage was completely worthless...
I just thought that something should be done like the
quarterback ratings so that everything figures in.

                       Chris
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dtodd@wizard.encore.com (Donald Todd)
Subject: T.E. or not T.E. - That is the question
Reply-To: dtodd@wizard.encore.com (Donald Todd)
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 13:48:10 GMT


	In one of my fantasy football leagues, someone is trying to
draft Shannon Sharpe (Denver Broncos) as a T.E.  Does anyone know what
his official playing position is?  I've seen him listed as a T.E. in
some guides, and as a W.R. in others.

Any info will be greatly appreciated!

-Don Todd
Organization: Central Michigan University
Date: Sunday, 27 Sep 1992 22:18:51 EDT
From: <3ZASIB3@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Lions Update

Well, the Lions blew it again.  Problem: The offense does not stay on the
field long enough.  The defense plays well through three quarters.  I don't
think they have been scored on in the 3rd quarter this season.  But do they
give up points in the 4th -- must be tired.  This was a problem last year
and the year before -- ergo needed tight ends.  Now the problem *is* the
"Jumbo offense," which was a bust last year.  Now they discover that they've
got to spread the offense.  Back to the real "run-and-shoot."  Game plans
have cost these games.
Rodney Peete is a helluva QB.  He had a career best passing day 323 yrds.
While the numbers are not showing it, because he is being tackled *before*
he gets the ball, BARRY SANDERS is phenomenal to watch.  But watch out next
week when they go back to four WRs and spread the defense.  We are only four
games into the season and they "haven't been beaten yet, they've just run
out of time" as super Lion Bobby Lane used to say.   Bob "A Lion Faithful"
From: v069qqqc@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Mike C.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Buffalo Broncos will lose!
Date: 1 Oct 92 23:40:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Oct1.175433.3573@contel0.com>, billp@contel0.com (William H. Papazian - Data Engineering) writes...
> 
>All this talk of the Bills going undefeated is a joke. Let's
>see, they played three really bad teams and they looked 
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>pretty good.  Big deal.  I will guarantee that the Buffalo
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Broncos will lose to the Dolphins -- my prediction is below:
> 

So Miami has played 3 really bad teams and looked damn shitty. What's
your point?

(BTW, invoking the same logic you used to rename the Bills the
'Buffalo Broncos', I propose we start calling your team the 
'Miami Browns'.)

:-)

Mike 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: Eagles 16-0? (was EAGLES WILL GO 16-0 IF ANYONE DOES)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 20:23:12 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Louisville
Followup-To: <1992sep30.191643.12032@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>

In article <1992Oct5.145339.22001@makesys.com>, john@makesys.com (John Turman) writes:
> 
>>THE EAGLES ARE THE BEST TEAM IN THE NFL BY FAR AND WILL GO 16-0 AND WIN THE
>>SUPERBOWL AND THE SCORE MON WILL BE AS FOLLOWS:
> 
>>                                EAGLES 42
>>                                COWPUSSIES 3
> 
> Who is this moronic idiot? He doesn't even realize that the Cowboys and Eagles
> can't play each other in the Super Bowl because they're in the same conference.
> 
> Get a clue asshole, learn about the NFL before you post this stupid drivel. And
> BTW you don't have to hear we can shout you.
> 
> This guy appears to have an IQ equal to the total score of his SB prediction.
> 
> John T.
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you take yourself too seriously, you'll be the only one who does.
> 
> ..John "Dolphinatic" Turman...

       Hey John, read the post throughly. 

                               -doug THE dolfan-
From: rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Buffalo??  Philly??  Nope!!!
Date: 30 Sep 92 15:08:57 GMT
Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino CA, USA

In article <BvEC7z.DAH@acsu.buffalo.edu> v079l2xj@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (MARK B KRUZYNSKI) writes:
>Gee, where does it say 4th best in the NFL?  I just said that Davis could, and
>probably should start for a number of NFL teams.  The guy gets a couple of 100

Just a guess, but when you said he could "start for 25 teams in the league",
John probably did the math(unlike you) and realized that this means there
are only 3 teams he wouldn't start for, so he is number 1(unless those
teams also have backups who could start for 25 teams in the league).

You didn't say "for a number", you said 25, John was just pointing out
you were wrong.




Russ Smith
*******************************************************************************
WARNING: POTENTIALLY OFFENSIVE JOKE FOLLOWS.

49er kicker Mike Cofer tried unsuccessfully to commit suicide the other day.
Cofer tried to hang himself, but was unable to kick the chair out from under
his body.
********************************************************************************
From: bernie@lgc.com (Bernie De La Torre)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Ferrell Edmunds (Dolphins)
Date: 6 Oct 92 14:12:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: lgc.1992Oct6.141251.9656
Organization: Landmark Graphics Corp., Houston, Tx.

What's the story with Ferrell Edmunds? Has he asked for a trade after
the acquisition of Keith Jackson? Did he play in the game against Buffalo?
I noticed he did not appear in any of the stats? I hope we don't lose
him. He is a great tight end and together with Jackson can contribute
greatly to the Dolphin's offense.
-- 
*-------------------------------------------------------------*
*    Bernie de la Torre  Landmark Graphics Corporation
*    333 Cypress Run     Houston, Texas 77094   (713)-579-4680
*    bdelatorre@lgc.com  Rm 247
*-------------------------------------------------------------*
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Eagles : YIKES!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 18:50:02 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.151139.10336@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>The Eagles will have to play their BEST game to
>beat the Niners in my opinion. 
So you are not saying anything here, or you telling us that 
the Niners do not have to play their BEST game to beat the Eagles.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Fins and Chips (Buffalo)
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 14:25:22 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

       I hope you Bills fans are ready for the ride of a life time.
The Dolphins are ready for the Bills! My biggest worry is Therman
Thomas. In the last five years Miami has not been able to stop him.
Hopefully this year with Offerdahl back and a healthy Bobby Harden
and rookie Troy Vincent, Thermal can be slowed down a bit. If the fins
can hold Thermal to under 100 yards receiving and running (the sum)
I think the dolphins have a great chance to win. If not then things
could start snowballing for the Buffalo offense, with the crowd firing up
the whole team. This would mean a long day for the fins. Hopefully
Olivadotie(sp?) will finally come up with a plan to keep Therman from
roaming free through the Dolphin's deffense as he usually does. Any way
that's the key as I see it. I'll be keeping an eye on Therman and
the deffense during round one of the Dolphin-Bills series this year.

                      -doug THE dolfan-
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Lousy @#&%&%$ JETS!!!!
Keywords: Jets, Fish v Bills
Date: 28 Sep 92 17:57:35 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

Man oh man oh man,

These JETS are soo good at shooting themselves in the foot!  What a pathetic
display of amateur football.  Last year, they went 8-8 and into the playoffs
on the strength of their defense.  This year, when they get a decent (no,
actually a really good) passer, what happens??  their defense starts to suck!
I mean, sure Nagle is a rookie and he's entitled to make mistakes (but he
looks promising) but people like Thomas and Baxter and especially the moron
on the offensive line just keeps turning the ball over/ getting penalties.

Maybe the problem is Coslet.  What the JETS need is a coach who will slap 'em
across the head when the screw up...  Boy it's frustrating being a football
fan from New York

satish nair
.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: Hey Joel read THROUGHLY
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 12:22:54 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <1992Sep30.210130.4960@news.stolaf.edu>, alvstad@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Joel D Alvstad) writes:
> In article <1992Sep30.191643.12032@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> aperkins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Aaron B. Perkins) writes:
>>
>>THE EAGLES ARE THE BEST TEAM IN THE NFL BY FAR AND WILL GO 16-0 AND WIN THE
>>SUPERBOWL AND THE SCORE MON WILL BE AS FOLLOWS:
>>
>>                                EAGLES 42
>>                                COWPUSSIES 3
>>
>>
>>
>>BARKLEY,JULIUS,CUNNINGHAM,BARNETT,BOL.......NOW THOSE ARE SOME BAD ASS DUDES
> 
> Dude, do you know ANYTHING about the playoff system??  Judging by your Super 
> Bowl prediction, I'd say no.
> 
> Joel Alvstad
> 
> 
       Hey Joel GET A CLUE!

                             -doug THE dolfan-