HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: henry@ADS.COM (Henry Mensch)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Madonna offers haven to Diana
Date: 4 Oct 92 04:56:45 GMT
Organization: Advanced Decision Systems; a div of Booz, Allen & Hamilton

jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton) wrote: 
->[I wonder who has more money, Madonna or Prince Charles?  Certainly Prince
->Charles has (or will have) better jewelry.  But there aren't many occasions
->when wearing the Star of India wouldn't be overdressing.]

well, chuck's mom is the tenth richest woman in the world ... 

--
# henry mensch / booz, allen & hamilton, inc.  / <henry@ads.com>
From: Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: TERMS OF ENDEARMENT
Date: Thu,  1 Oct 92 00:30:09 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <1992Sep28.151510.3349@spdcc.com> <1992Sep29.131305.26146@panix.com>
  <1992Sep30.134122.24324@fig.citib.com>

Greg Parkinson writes:
>that Pookie (or Pookie Bear) was the name of
>Garfield's teddy. So of course I just rang up

While I knew this, the first "person" to come to my mind when
I hear/read "Pookie" is [this may get me relegated to the 
SF.Geeks.Hell, if I'm not already] is Pookanthimbusille, a
very professional female Pervect bodyguard from Robert Asprin's
_Myth-Nomers_And_Im-Pervections_.

If you've not read the book, trust me -- it's a ludicrously
inappropriate calling for the personality of the character.
 
() We used to be a gentle, angry people. Now we're just angry.
()      -- Robert Kelly
-----
[> George D. Madison | NBCS: B8f+t+w-e+s+k+a!cv | Just say NO to razors! <]
[> It's a BEAR thing -- you wouldn't understand. <|> furr@cup.portal.com <]
From: berninge@cs.purdue.EDU (James Berninger)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Damon Wayons -- what's the deal?
Date: 28 Sep 92 20:58:06 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University

My boyfriend/SO/fiance/whatever and I were flipping channels the
other night (Saturday?) and happened to find something called "HBO
Comedy Showcase" or something like that, I think.  We only watched
about 30 seconds or so of it, because the only person we saw was
Damon Wayons -- one of the guys from "In Living Color: The TV
series".  The only "joke" we saw went something like this:
	"I used to beat up gays.  We all did.  It was easy, 'cause
	they don't fight back." [Followed by somewhat effeminate
	fleeing]

I realize that for some time, we have been trying to make heads or
tails of the "Men on..." skits -- was it light-hearted fun, or
downright degrading.  I wasn't too thrilled with what we saw that
night, but the TV was quickly turned off before I could see any more
(I was hoping to).

Did anyone else see this?  What's going on?  (For the record, I
didn't even get to hear what the audience's reaction was.)

Jim Berninger                   ______ "This is no 'Whoops!'  This is
berninge@cs.purdue.edu          \    /  an 'Aaaaaaaauuuuuggggghhhh!'"
B0.2 f(~) w- c- g k? s- e r- p   \  /   - Harvey ("Arnold") Fierstein
Green Lantern Fan, Extraordinaire \/      "Torch Song Trilogy"
From: fvaughn@lynx.coe.northeastern.edu (Frederick Vaughn)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Phyllis Schlafly Still Doesn't Get It
Date: 1 Oct 92 03:41:43 GMT
	<2AC9EA02.20216@ics.uci.edu> <PC.92Sep30204413@bacon.linus.mitre.org>
Organization: College of Engineering, Northeastern University
In-reply-to: pc@linus.mitre.org's message of 1 Oct 92 01:44:13 GMT

@Well, I went to Hunter College High School within the last 21 years,
@and we did have a very progressive sex ed course.  We learned about
@physiology of sex, the Kinsey report, contraception, etc.  The message
@clearly was to wait, but you should know what it's all about.  Of
@course we took sex ed when we were Juniors, which was a bit late for
@some... (Not me, I was confused back then)

@   Penny
A-HA! Another one of the (many) things I missed out on in our extremely
crappy, banal health class at Brooklyn Tech (ca. 1986, mind you: the same
year I began discovering all this gay b.s. GIRRRRRRL, was _I_ clueless even
after _THAT_ class?!?!)

FRED
 
--
*******************************************************************************
FREDERICK !  fvaughn@ds5000.dac.northeastern.edu (PRIMARY)
ELOY      !  bo643@cleveland.freenet.edu (SECONDARY)
VAUGHN    !  #REMINDER: The NAMES Project AIDS Memorial Quilt (all of it!!)##
   	  !  #Washington, DC Oct 9-11, 1992 (Columbus Day Weekend)###########
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: fjvwing@cs.vu.nl (FJ!!)
Subject: Re: evil twins
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 17:14:06 GMT

thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance) writes:
>You'd have to get a weave for the forelock...

I would?

John, why do you think our squirrel-friend, girl-friend,
round-the-world-friend thinks we are twins?

Did Marcus see you? He has seen me, maybe he could share his opinion in
how far we'd get in passing as siblings.

>You *don't* have clippers yet? 

Honey, putting clippers in my hands would be dangerous. I mean, I could
kill someone with them, without even trying, believe me. I need someone
else to do my hair.
							FJ!!
From: Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: CABAL stuff
Date: Sun,  4 Oct 92 13:07:58 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <67142@cup.portal.com> <1992Oct4.054123.22447@spdcc.com>

Steve Dyer writes:
>>[Live Bear Tubesteak is another matter entirely. ;-{)##]
>
>Where does sperm come in?

If I can eat chicken eggs, swallowing cum is no big thing.
;-{)##]

>>I may be oversensitive, but I detect a tinge of sarcasm...
>George, I always enjoy your company in person.  What sarcasm?

Possibly because we have a tendency to e-snarl at each other a
bit.... In any case, I'm glad you cleared that up.

>>I'm just curious what *HE* thinks is such hot stuff to do instead.
>In a hot spot like Amherst?  I wonder.  Maybe he'll be out here
>when Nelson Minar visits. 

I'll be intrigued to hear.
 
() B is for Basil, assaulted by bears.
-----
[> George D. Madison | NBCS: B8f+t+w-e+s+k+a!cv | Just say NO to razors! <]
[> It's a BEAR thing -- you wouldn't understand. <|> furr@cup.portal.com <]
From: jns@elea.umd.edu (J. N. Shaumeyer)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: usenet.age
Date: 26 Sep 92 23:58:45 GMT
Organization: Militant Homosexual Lobby, Gay Lifestyles, Inc.


Michael Siemon (mls@cbnewsm.cb.att.com) wrote:
 
> gsmith@lauren.uucp (Gene W. Smith) writes:
> 
> > God, I hope category theory still retains its uselessness!  
> > This degeneration into applied mathematics everywhere is depressing.
> 
> sadly, there are distinctly apps-grinding uses of 
> categories in cosmology and, ...

But prudence advises us to distinguish carefully
betwee 'use' and 'useful'.  [Fortunately, I'm an
experimentalist, so none of it makes any sense 
to me.]

> ... apparently, even indirectly in QM, ...

[One barely needs to point out that *everything*
 is used in Quantum Mechanics, and vice versa,
 usually indirectly.]

> ... as I find from scans of sci.physics.

It might be more fruitful for you if you
were to scan jeff.physics; well, it might
be more *fun* at least.

--jns  [sci.slut]
From: mcmelmon@aruba.apple.com (Matthew Melmon)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Faggots
Date: 28 Sep 92 02:03:31 GMT
Followup-To: soc.motss
Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.

In article <1992Sep25.023440.9034@microsoft.com>, bobsarv@microsoft.com
(Bob Sarver) wrote:

> Oooooh!  Alan, I think you're on to something here.  You don't really mean
> to imply that bashing straights might cause them to bash back, do  you?
> 
> Are you saying that the "I don't give a fuck about straights" attitude 
> could come around full circle and be visited on gays, could it?
> 
> Alan, what a thought-provoking concept . . .

Absolutely.  Many a demonstration has relied on 'shock value' to get it's
point across.  Given that, it seems the height of absurdity to turn around
and bitch about the very effect that was intended.  The Gay movement 
wanted to shock people?  Well, they succeeded.  And now, we are in the
times of *reaction*  Cause and effect.  Would the OCA be breathing fire
if not provoked?  Possibly, but I very seriously doubt it.  Without a 
target (the left nipple doesn't count...), there isn't anything to
shoot at.  So it was very considerate of the flaming pink brigade to
present a nice target.  And now, their getting shot at.

And screaming about how unfair it all is.

Perhaps they should have thought of that before; and now, we may all go
down with them.

Matthew Melmon
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance)
Subject: Re: evil twins
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
 <thaaang.718067947@cwis> <73098@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 07:44:32 GMT

richard@Apple.COM (a flying squirrel) writes:

>John Dorrance writes:

>>*snif* Well. Can I be a flood hazard instead?

>Depends on how you are flagging.

I'm unflagging, dear.

>Besides, you have Special Points in my book for naming a group of
>young men wandering about bored at a shopping mall as a "Twinkie Fun Pak".

And you've got a special place in my heart for defining Boys' Town as a
lending library.

--
John Dorrance * Alleged Homosexual/Shameless Hussy * thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu

			Dark. Handsome. 6 feet tall.
		  31 flavors? I believe he's got 'em all!
From: thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Toys 'r' Us
Keywords: Whee!
Date: 30 Sep 92 06:11:24 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha

Do you have a favorite sex toy? Have you ever given a sex toy a nickname?
What criterion do you use in choosing a sex toy (besides size, of course) -
does color come into consideration? Heft? Smell? Have you ever used sex
toys in your decorating?

And lube - have you eroticized the flavor of nonoxynol-9 yet? Do you
comparison shop? Would your lube shopping experience be more pleasurable
if they allowed sampling? And is Wet still available (I have to go into
Iowa to buy lube at all, and I haven't seen Wet there lately; a shame,
since I really like the taste, especially when compared with Elbow Grease,
the kind I'm using now (well, not *right* now))? What's you're favorite
kind?

John, redirecting conversation

--
John Dorrance * Alleged Homosexual/Shameless Hussy * thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu

			Dark. Handsome. 6 feet tall.
		  31 flavors? I believe he's got 'em all!
From: richard@Apple.COM (a flying squirrel)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Ah, Fashion.
Date: 1 Oct 92 22:06:49 GMT
Organization: Xiola Blue

A Man Cums On Men (Eamonn McManus) writes:

>A flying squirrel writes:
>> What's in Fashion?  For Men, Smooth Look Goes Integral

>Go on, admit it.  You posted that just to get a rise out of George
>Madison.  And if it doesn't work, I'll eat my chocolate hob-nob

Start munching, buddy.  I am but a messenger.  *I* did not write the
article.  *My* back, shoulders, chest, and arms are all full of follicles
(which is more than I can say for my scalp).

Now go away and hob-nob with your follicle-obsessed boyfriend.  Has he
played the "Dress Up the Eamonn Doll" yet?  We're anxiously awaiting 
the results of The New You, dear.
-- 
a flying squirrel is: richard@apple.com  Apple Computer Inc.

i'm your girl            friend
i'm your squirrel        friend
i'm your round the world friend

cruising: vidi, vici, veni.
From: black@sybase.com (Christina Black)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: same sex marriages
Date: 26 Sep 92 00:32:06 GMT

bond@rtsg.mot.com writes:
 
+ Also, with respect to DP benefits, I'd be worried about people abusing
+ the system.  Sad but true, people will lie, cheat & steal to get what
+ they want.  In a system which allows non-married partners (same- or
+ opposite-sex) to receive medical benefits, relocation assistance,
+ etc.,  the scum of this world will find ways to profit from it.  True,
+ people exist who use marriage solely for profit (e.g. to gain residency
+ in a country,) but I believe that number to be small primarily because
+ marriage is a BINDING, LEGAL CONTRACT that is not easily broken.

DP agreements have been used as evidence in palimony suits, so they are
binding in some sense.

Nonetheless, I do agree that the time for gay marriage is here.

-- Chris
black@sybase.com
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton)
Subject: Re: CABAL stuff
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 03:42:56 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.164745.18472@spdcc.com> dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) writes:
>
>(OK, I still think the Max Montoya shaving scene in "Max Makes it Big"
>is the dasysophile's equivalent of a snuff film, but that's MY problem.)

I thought at first that dasys might not be the right root, but I looked it
up to be sure.  It means both "hairy" and "thick".  Exactly right, Steve. 


-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Hamilton   jfh@netcom.com   P. O. Box 281107   SF, CA   94128-1107
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: enough already.
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 01:14:28 GMT


In article <1992Sep29.232428.8502@reed.edu> nelson@reed.edu
(Nelson Minar) writes:

>In article <1992Sep29.190250.23521@macc.wisc.edu>
anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:

>>Clay, absent now a goodly while, seems to be turning into the
>>motss-style Heroic Figure.

>I must not have written my post very clearly if you got that
>impression from it.

I wasn't thinking only of you, however.

>The main thing that I learned from Clay is that some people
>are bitter assholes,

A relative judgment, I would say in general, and sometimes
one that a person has occasion to revise, if the opinion is
not clamped too tightly to the sense of self.

>and that I better not let these people affect my happiness.

My own tendency would be to generalize that one step
further: let no one affect your happiness, be the whole and
entire cause of your own happiness.  Such others as good
fortune grants you access to are just something very nice to
add to what you already are, I think (generic "you" intended
in this paragraph).

>Not a pleasant lesson, but I suppose I needed to learn it
>some time.

Ah, but almost all growth come at some cost in pain.

>On the other hand, I am talking about him, aren't I?

That too, certainly.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: bcapps@agora.rain.com (Brent Capps)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: A field guide
Keywords: nature boy
Date: 5 Oct 92 19:30:31 GMT
Organization: Open Communications Forum

A friend of ours in California (Bud Berkeley) has finally found a
publisher for his next book on foreskins.

This is a fetish worth exploring.  

When approaching a wild penis, do not startle it.  Sudden motions may
cause it to bolt before you are close enough to perform your measurements.
Always approach from downwind.  Drink in its musky odor which it uses to
mark its territory.  Above all, respect your subject.

Take a moment to observe it from a short distance away.  Admire the
craftsmanship that went into its creation; this is best accomplished
while it is semi-erect, say shortly after dawn during its customary trip
to visit the watering hole.

When you have gained its trust (sometimes only after years of patience
and observation!), gently take it in your hands.  Feel its heft.  Observe
the latent power represented by its pattern of intercrossing veins.  Note
its majesty while in a state of semi-repose; alert but not yet roused, it
is ready to stand to action any time the need should arise.

Now notice how the glans half-peeks out of the foreskin, as if to say,
"I have not yet begun to fight".  To gain its friendship, stroke it under
the chin.  Most penii seem to like this and respond by standing up.
You may take this as a sign of acceptance and an invitation to further
intimacy.

At this point in the social ritual the foreskin will slowly peel itself
from the glans.  This is gesture of interest, and the polite and socially
correct response is to offer some token gift in liquid form; saliva will do
nicely.  How much to apply is a function of the social standing of the
specimen; the younger adolescent members may need but a token amount to
return the favor, but the larger and more mature phalli will demand a more
copious offering as befits their role in the pecking order.  You may need
to actually cradle the specimen in your mouth to generate the required
amounts.

At some point toward the end of the ritual ceremony the penis will tremble,
grow superrigid, and return this liquid gift, albeit in a different form.
Customs change; demuring on accepting this offering is no longer considered
rude.

At this point the beast may wish to go back to sleep, but excellent results
have sometimes be obtained by getting the penis to overcome this natural
inclination.  Use your own discretion in deciding whether to proceed further.
Who knows, you may be on the verge of a breakthrough of understanding.

Happy hunting.

-- 
Brent Capps           | 
bcapps@agora.rain.com | Know what to kiss, and when.
bcapps@atlastele.com  |
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: CABAL stuff
Date: 5 Oct 92 01:21:11 GMT
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison


In article <1ao36tINN14n@mizar.usc.edu>
adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:

>| >Yes, that's right folks, pen those cows up into those tiny-teeny
>| >little pens and feed 'em that synthetic hay, and hook those cups
>| >up to their udders and milk 'em and milk 'em and milk 'em until
>| >they're dead, but don't you *dare* think about eating them.

>Is that not what happens in the commercial dairy industry?

Certainly not.  Apart from twice daily milking, dairy cows
are (except in forbidding weather) out in the pasture.  What
you describe is more like the veal biz.

>But I do wonder at this ability to
>overlook how badly animals are treated in the egg and dairy
>businesses,

Dairy cows aren't treated too badly, I'd say.  Better than
most people treat their children, probably.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: gsmith@euterpe.uucp (Gene W. Smith)
Subject: Re: enough already.
Organization: IWR, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 16:34:56 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.010738.14964@macc.wisc.edu>
anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:

>And I think everyone who doesn't know opera should start with Butterfly
>(and a lot of patience).


Naah.  They should start with Parsival, and even more patience. 
Buckets of the stuff.

-- 
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/IWR/Ruprecht-Karls University 
               gsmith@kalliope.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: soc.motss shrinks in half
Date: 2 Oct 92 14:13:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: spdcc.1992Oct2.141336.19182
Organization: insert anything here

nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar) writes:
>no sooner do I go babbling about 80,000 people on motss and how it
>probably isn't off by more than a factor of two, when Brian Reid
>changes his statistics counting.

>The latest news.lists posting lists soc.motss to be about 39,000
>readers. This is literally half of what was reported last month. I
>asked about it, and what happened is he re-estimated the size of the
>Usenet (something about NNTP servers inflating figures from what they
>were 14 months ago). So most groups shrunk a bunch, including us.

>Of course, 39,000 is still an enormous amount of people. 

	I'm not too surprised.  I joined when the group was at
about 8,000, and there were times when readership seemed to double
but volume didn't seem to change much.  One big jump occurred when
the link to Europe was established.  So, while everything
has slimmed by about 50%, it's still a large number.

BBC
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: buckmr@lib110.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire)
Subject: Re: Governor Signs California Rights Legislation
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 20:28:07 GMT

rjwill6@PacBell.COM (Rod Williams) writes:

>AB-101, vetoed by Wilson last year, also included amendment of
>the State Fair Housing Act to prohibit discrimination based on
>sexual orientation.  This was left out of AB-2601, but a past
>State Supreme Court (a much more liberal court than we have
>today) interpretation of this act has found that gays and
>lesbians are already protected against discrimination in
>housing...
But the Supreme Court has currently voided this ruling as it ponders its 
decision in the Soroka case, which is basically a challenge to this statute
that bans  housing discrimination.

-- 
RON BUCKMIRE, 11 Colvin Circle, Troy, NY 12180-3735. ``D.C., April 25 1993''
vox:(518)-276-8910 fax:(518)-276-6920 buckmr@rpi.edu buckmr@rpitsmts.bitnet
The First Amendment: not just a good idea, it's the law.-murphy@omega.npri.com
From: williams@ug.cs.dal.ca (Nevin E. Williams)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: I'll get the hang of this yet...
Date: 5 Oct 92 14:31:38 GMT
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
	Nevie


 | You Never Really Know|    |Yes, I *do* have a life|    |IRC sure is cheap |
 | Nevin E. Williams (williams@ug.cs.dal.ca) The most unorthodox CS geek ever|
 |  __ When fun becomes so hazardous that it erodes the quality of life, __  | 
 |  \/                    Then you must begin living.                    \/  |
From: Minotaur@cup.portal.com (Frank - Swilling)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Image Magazine
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 18:14:05 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world

You women and men who are interested in feminist issues and aren't
lucky enough to live in the San Francisco Bay Area might want to
check with your biggest newstand and see if they have any issues of
last Sunday's San Francisco Chronicle/Examiner.  (That would be
September 27, 1992.)

Image, a glossy newsmagazine supplement to the paper which is produced
by the San Francisco Examiner devotes this issue to "Feminism and its
Discontents", featuring interviews of Susan Faludi, Naomi Wolf, and
Camille Paglia.  I just finished it, and some interesting things were
said by all.

Frank
Minotaur@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: ry@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (ryerson.schwark)
Subject: Re: demuffining
Organization: UNIX System Laboratories, Summit, NJ
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 17:51:44 GMT

In article <lch493INNnkg@spim.mti.sgi.com> dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
>Hi!  My name is Jeff and this is my first posting to soc.motss
>so don't flame me!!!  
>
>I am angry to see so many flames.  

Oh Jeffy!  You're so right.  I'm so so sorry for being such a big meanie.
kissy-kissy.  I know, let's, um, do a group hug! And then Boob Slobber
and Melonhead and Vainyell can share with us and we can sympathize with
their pain.  Maybe we can even take up a collection to buy them Rick
Donovan penis enlargers!  I was looking in the back of one of those magazines,
well, at least when I still had them, because you know I burned them all
because a lesbian told me that pornography degrades women which I didn't
understand cause there weren't any women, but anyway, I saw this big
vacuum thingie, ya know?  and I just thought, like *WOW*, this thing could
like bring world peace ya know? 'cuz like if all the guys who like had
small peepees and kept trying to kill people and stuff to show that they
had big peepees (am I allowed to use a dirty word like peepee here?),
like actually *GOT* big peepees then they could me nice and friendly all
the time.  Am I making any sense?  Its so hard to think with the vacuum
going.

Smurfy smooches,


Ry
ry@usl.com
Newsgroups: soc.motss