HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: h8915726@hkuxb.hku.hk (Loser)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.apps,comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Strange Problem with EMM386.EXE
Date: 6 Oct 92 11:05:52 GMT
Reply-To: h8915726@hkuxa.hku.hk
Distribution: usa
Organization: who cares?
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

luneauf@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Luneau Francois) writes:
: 
: If I remember well, the new EMM386.exe is like the new SMARTDRIVE for window 
: 3.1 (SMARTDRV.EXE version 4.0).  What I mean is that it is now an executable
: file, instead of a device.  That means that the "device=" statement in the
: config.sys file is not necessary anymore, since it is an executable file.
: 
: i.e. Why you don't need the "device=" anymore is because it is not
: a device anymore...
: 
: Frank Moon

	Yes, and Absolutely No...
	Yes: Both EMM386.EXE and SMARTDRV.EXE are executables.
	NO:  EMM386.EXE MUST be loaded in CONFIG.SYS in order to
	     setup EMS and High Memory. At commandline, at most
	     it can only display status and turn (configed) EMS
	     on or off (most of the time, you can't, in fact).

	     SMARTDRV.EXE is need to be add in CONFIG.SYS if
	     double buffering is to be enable. Otherwise, yes,
	     you only need to a one line in AUTOEXEC.BAT.

	.EXE does not necessary means not a device driver, a .SYS
	also does not mean a device driver for sure. Some .SYS,
	after re-named to .EXE, can run as TSR, e.g. X00.SYS,
	NNANSI.SYS. HYPERDISK can loaded as DEVICE driver and TSR.

--
Chris Lo
University of Hong Kong
H8915726@hkuxa.hku.hk
Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.apps:5039 comp.os.msdos.misc:5499
From: bschurr@qa1.WichitaKS.NCR.COM (Barry Schurr)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Wanted Q&A Database Decryption Program
Date: 2 Oct 92 20:27:29 GMT
Reply-To: bschurr@qa1.WichitaKS.NCR.COM (Barry Schurr)
Distribution: usa
Organization: NCR Corporation, Wichita KS

I am looking for a program that can decrypt or decipher the userid
and passwd on a Q&A database file.

We have several files that have been userid/password protected by
an individual who has moved on.

Does anybody know of such a program existing out there on a BBS or
FTP site.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry Schurr, Information Systems & Services, NCR Peripheral Products Division
 NCR:654-8336   <Barry.Schurr@WichitaKS.NCR.COM>
(316)636-8336   <uunet!ncrcom!ncrwic!barry.schurr>
From: leadfoot@bigbootay.sw.stratus.com (Mark Curtis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: Communications package?
Date: 1 Oct 92 20:57:04 GMT

In article <rick.717951872@sundance>, rick@sundance.SJSU.EDU (Richard Warner) writes:
|> bob@netcom.com (Bob Becker) writes:
|> 
|> >In article <6541@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> prpst2+@pitt.edu (Paul R Perdeus) writes:
|> >>Hello all!
|> >>
|> >>      I am looking for advice on a communications package.  I am currently
|> >>      using Kermit v 3.11 and am looking for something a little more
|> >>      sophisticated.  It seems as though the leading contenders these days
|> 
|> >Two tomato juice cans and a waxed string are more sophisticated than Kermit.
|> 
|> It might not have a fancy interface, but it is a heck of a lot more 
|> sophisticated than that.  V. 3.11 includes telnet capabilities.  How
|> many comm programs do you know that can do that?  V. 3.12 can do
|> telnet over bare ODI as well as TCP/IP.  It is the only program that
|> can do that as far as I know.  Give the hard working guy that keeps
|> updating MS-Kermit (Joe Doupnik at Utah State) a lot of credit for providing
|> a lot of bare-bones functionality, compliance with language and interface
|> of all the other Columbia-sanctioned Kermit products, and at a 
|> respectable price ($0 - free, not even shareware!).

Damn right!  Kermit may not be tuned to a gnats's ass, but it works
everywhere!  Packet size, error checking, and timing are so
adjustable that it even works on links with 60+ second turnaround
time.  I use Zmodem if possible on most BBSs, but I keep kermit
updated to the latest version on my unix boxes and PC at all times.
Kermit works everytime, no question.
From: ardtlong@adam.adelaide.edu.au (Dale T. Long)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: What is better for a 286 EMS or XMS?
Date: 29 Sep 92 03:43:51 GMT
Organization: The University of Adelaide
NNTP-Posting-Host: adam.adelaide.edu.au


I am unfortunate enough to be still using a 286 machine. I was wondering
what 'memory system' would be best to use on such as machine. Expanded
(LIM 4.0, EMS, EEMS etc...) or Extended (XMS etc...) ? Which would be the
more efficient and reliable and most used?


Dale Long
ardtlong@adam.adelaide.edu.au
From: prpst2+@pitt.edu (Paul R Perdeus)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Communications package?
Date: 30 Sep 92 16:05:53 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
Originator: prpst2@pmax1.cis.pitt.edu

Hello all!

      I am looking for advice on a communications package.  I am currently
      using Kermit v 3.11 and am looking for something a little more
      sophisticated.  It seems as though the leading contenders these days
      are Crosstalk Mk 4 and Procomm Plus.  I was hoping for some opinions
      on these products or any other suggestions.  I have also heard/read
      that Procomm Plus for Dos is excellent but the Windows version is not
      quite as good.  Any experiences?  I'd greatly appreciate all responses,
      either to this newsgroup or via email to the address below.


                                                   Thanks!
                                                      Paul
                                      prpst2@unix.cis.pitt.edu
From: jwstuart@ecst.csuchico.edu (Jesse William Leo Stuart)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: WANTED: Intel 486 Assembly Resource and Assembler
Date: 28 Sep 92 18:33:30 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico


	I'm looking for an excelent 486 Assembler and Resource.  I want to 
program some 32 bit assembly routines for my Turbo Pascal 6.0 programs to
use.

Jess Stuart
CSUC Chico CA
From: egge@johanna3.hsr.no (Hans Petter Egge)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: DRDOS6.0 : Incompatibilities?
Date: 29 Sep 92 17:02:16 GMT
Organization: Rogaland University Center

In article <1992Sep29.091020.13196@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu>, cbarilleaux@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Cyberpreppie) writes:
> I have a quirk for  DR DOS 6. I have SuperStore drivers loaded. When I do a
> DIR, it reports 17,727,488 bytes free on my hard drive, which is the same
> figure XDIR gives me. However, when I do CHKDSK, it claims I have 30,408,704
> free. Adding CHKDSK's number to the used space number it adds up to *about* the
> total amount of space it reports for my whole disk. Free memory is also not the
> same for MEM and CHKDSK.
> 	
> Has anyone else noticed this? Which should I believe?

Yes, I've also noticed this. Apparently what happens is that CHKDSK reads the FAT (which is large enough to store approx. twice the drive capacity) and report free diskspace from how many clusters are marked available (altough that may be more clusters that will actually fit on the disk, depending on compression ratio).
And you should also notice that CHKDSK always reports the total diskspace on a SuperStore'd disk as twice the physical diskspace. To see the actual total size of the disk use SSTOR.

The one (CHKDSK or DIR/XDIR) you should believe is definetly DIR/XDIR (and of course SSTOR)

                        --------------------------
Hans Petter Egge                            |  I'm so busy wasting time,
HSR,                                        |  that I've got no time to waste
Stavanger, Norway
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: curzon@trooa.enet.dec.com (Richard Curzon)
Subject: Word Perfect PRS w/ line draw chars
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:24:08 GMT


Is there a way to print a WP doc to a file and still see the frames around
tables, and other line draw characters?  I.E. something that could be
loaded into file viewer -- no printer control characters etc. 

thanks for any tips...

                                Richard Curzon, Digital Equipment of Canada
				Toronto
   (from INTERNET)     curzon@trooa.ENET.dec.com 
   (from COMPUSERVE)   71371,2521  OR  >INTERNET:curzon@trooa.ENET.dec.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: jfmburg@cs.vu.nl (JFM Burg)
Subject: wp NEC p/20 driver?
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 08:47:59 GMT

Hey,

when I was installing WordPerfect 5.1 yesterday, I couldn't find a
printerdriver for my NEC Pinwriter P/20. There are drivers for the P/2,
P/2+, P/3 etc, but not for the P/20 or P/30. 

I've tried, though, the P/2+, but it's not fully compatible. Now I've got
the following question:

Is there another driver that is compatible with the P/20  (Epson, Star ?)
or is there a P/20 driver available (on a FTP-site, maybe?) ?

If you do know the answer, let me know quickly, please,

thanx in advance,

				Hans
-- 
				Hans Burg
				Vrije Universiteit
				Amsterdam, Holland
				e-mail : jfmburg@cs.vu.nl
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: barry@coyote.datalog.com (Barry Mishkind)
Subject: STACK SPACE
Organization: Datalog Consulting, Tucson, AZ
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 18:30:31 GMT

One of the most frustrating things that happens to me in programming BASIC
(OK, so you don't like BASIC ... it is simple and works for many simple 
tasks, doesn't it?) is that when I run the program created, I occassionally
get a "Out of Stack Space" or some such message. I try CLEAR ,, 2000, but 
without relief.

Can anyone explain in simple terms how to monitor/control this problem, so
I know whwen I'm going to hit it, and how to avoid it?

Thanks

---
Barry Mishkind
barry@coyote.datalog.com                  FidoNet 1:300/11.3
Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.apps:5058 comp.os.msdos.misc:5517 comp.os.ms-windows.apps:3452 comp.os.ms-windows.misc:3606 comp.os.ms-windows.setup:1556
From: sph0301@utsph.sph.uth.tmc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.apps,comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Strange Problem with EMM386.EXE
Date: 6 Oct 1992 13:01:48 GMT
Followup-To: comp.os.msdos.apps
Distribution: usa
Organization: Univ. of Texas School of Public Health

In article <1992Oct6.051520.22849@cc.umontreal.ca> luneauf@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Luneau Francois) writes:
>If I remember well, the new EMM386.exe is like the new SMARTDRIVE for window
>3.1 (SMARTDRV.EXE version 4.0).  What I mean is that it is now an executable
>file, instead of a device.  That means that the "device=" statement in the
>config.sys file is not necessary anymore, since it is an executable file.


Not so...EMM386.EXE is still loaded as a device driver.  Read your manual -
both DOS and Windows manuals document this well.  The latest SMARTDRIVE 
(which is an executable) can now be loaded in the autoexec.bat file but 
EMM386.EXE still goes in config.sys and starts with DEVICE=
From: hjh@goose.dsto.gov.au (Howard Harvey)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: DRDOS6.0 : Incompatibilities?
Keywords: DRDOS
Date: 1 Oct 92 15:02:51 GMT

knepley@CS.ColoState.EDU (Ranseus (Jim Knepley)) writes:

>In article <1992Sep24.161310.164638@dstos3.dsto.gov.au> hjh@goose.dsto.gov.au (Howard Harvey) writes:
>>news@massey.ac.nz (USENET News System) writes:
>>Not so much an incompatibility but a problem within DRDOS V6.0:  If you are
>>formatting floppies, you must first switch off (disable or uninstall) SUPERPCK
>>or else the floppy will get many lost clusters.

>Er, um, I've never had this problem...
>It seems that DR DOS doesn't act the same over eveyone's machine.  Wierd.

>Jim

>-- 
>**** knepley@cs.colostate.edu ****************** Boycott Microsoft ****
> Jim Knepley           Magician, programmer, computer geek.
>   (Ranseus)    Proud user of Clinton condoms.  Scented like Flowers.
>*********** CTHULHU IN '92! -- Why vote for the LESSER evil? **********

I am not the only person who has had this problem.  I forwarded my comments
and a copy of CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT to Frotz but have not yet got
a reply. 

To those who believe that the problem is due to premature ejection of the
floppy: I tried the formatting as the very first action after booting the
system, so there should not have been any residual reference to B: in
the SUPERPCK.  The number of bytes lost was reported immediately on 
completion of the formatting procedure and was identical for several floppies
formatted at the same time.  CHKDSK was necessary to clear up the diskettes.

I will redo the tests as soon as I can and report back.

Howie


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Howard J. Harvey                              | Email: hjh@aeg.dsto.gov.au
SOIC - Avionics Integration                   | Phone: +61 8 259 6322
Air Operations Division                       | FAX:   +61 8 259 5507
Defence Science and Technology Organisation   | c = 1802617499785.254116 f/f
Salisbury, South Australia                    |     (furlongs/fortnight)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,alt.binaries.pictures.utilities
From: cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us (gordon hlavenka)
Subject: *.WPG -> Quatro Pro *.CLP
Summary: How do I do this conversion?
Organization: Vpnet Public Access
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 22:15:36 GMT

I have a graphic which was originally produced as a PCX file.  I used
this graphic in several WordPerfect documents, and now want to include
it in a Quattro Pro 3.0 spreadsheet.  Unfortunately, the original PCX
artwork has evaporated.

Quattro Pro 3.0 will import graphics in the CLP format, so I need to
find some way to do a conversion from WPG to CLP.  It doesn't matter
if there are several steps along the way (like maybe WPG-GIF-PCX-CLP
or something) but I would _really_ like the extraction from WPG to be
lossless so that I can coincidentally recover the original artwork.

Does anybody know of a utility that will help with either the surface
problem of converting from WPG to (???) or the underlying problem of
importing WPG into Quattro Pro 3.0?

If nothing else, I'll need the WPG (bitmap) and Borland CLP file
formats and I'll write a converter of some sort.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Gordon S. Hlavenka           cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us
  Don't forget:  Dave Barry/Joe Walsh in November!
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: liberato@dri.com (Jimmy Liberato)
Subject: Re: DRDOS and WIN 3.1 Upper Memory Management
Reply-To: liberato@dri.com (Jimmy Liberato)
Organization: Novell/Desktop Systems Group, Monterey Development Center
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 04:49:28 GMT

int704v@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Mark Cosham) writes:

>mrbill@leland.Stanford.EDU (William Bowen) writes:

>>Has anyone had any luck running windows 3.1 using the range B000-B7FF with
>>DR-DOS EMM386.SYS /I-B000-B7FF? I've tried, but windows won't start...

>Well, I've had problems with that area too, and I'm running MS-DOS!
>...

Most video cards will allow you to use the monochrome buffer area if you
follow the "monoumb2.386" installation procedure mentioned in the Windows
README file.

--
Jimmy Liberato   liberato@dri.com
                 ...uunet!drivax!liberato


Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Stacker / Smartdrive
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 18:32:32 GMT

In <1992Sep27.172445.861@unine.ch> Louis.Egger@bota.unine.ch writes:

>Hi!

>I'm running into a real GREAT problem...

> Since a few days STACKER is turning me into a mad PC User. >:-[]

> Well i'm going to expose ( as clearly as possible ) my problem.

> I 'Stacked' my Hard disk ( 100 MB -> 200 MB ) and for many months had no 
>troubles at all. Recently I put an erase-protect (The EP from Norton) on my 
>stacked drive and a disk-cache (SmartDrv.exe from Microsoft) on my uncompressed
>drive. It all worked fine for several weeks BUT SUDDENLY my stacked drive get
>Write-Protected by the program STACKER and since then i can only read my 
>stacked drive (absolutely unpossible to write (or delete) a file on that drive)
>8-o

> I re-booted my computer and STACKER reported that the Stackvol.dsk file was
>damaged (and therefore write-protected the drive).

> I checked the stacked drive with SCHECK.EXE the answer was that there was just
>one lost cluster in an EP file ( but no problems at all on the UNcompressed 
>drive ) and that i should first correct CHKDSK /F but it wasn't able to repair
>it ( the drive is always write-protected )....
> 
> I also tried the Norton Disk Doctor the result was the same: unable
>to correct the problem (can't write on that disk).

>Help me, i don't want to format my Hard Disk and loose 200 MG of Programs!!

>WHAT CAN I DO ????

Look in your Stacker manual in the Appendix containing the error
messages.  Look for the error message about having a write protected
Stacker drive.  Do what it says.

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: joet@dcatlas.dot.gov (Joe Trott)
Subject: Re: Nortons vs PC Tools - Recommendations?
Organization: U.S Dept. of Transportation
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 19:51:47 GMT


In the reviews I have read, Norton is considered to have the best and most
complete disk and file recovery utilities.  All around, however, PC Tools is
typically rated the best.  Naturally, the objectivity of the reviews in
magazines which accept advertising may be suspect, but reading between the
lines yielded no obvious inconsistencies.

I have used both, and rather extensively.  Personally, I much prefer PC Tools.
There are cases, however, where I will dig out Norton, because there are
things that PC Tools does not handle as well.  Usually, however, any problems
I am likely to encounter can be handled by PC Tools.  And yes, it is a *very*
complete package, with all kinds of things Norton doesn't include.  I do not
trust Norton's disk cache *at*all*, ever since Norton's own SI told me that
"only hard drives may be tested" when I ran it on an NCACHEd disk (it runs
just fine on a PC-CACHEd disk).
Also, NCC in Norton 5.0 was buggy (I still use the one from 4.5).

For the needs you are describing, Norton may be the best.  If you begin
thinking of all the other things you might like to do, I think you would
prefer PC Tools.

-JTT

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: kilpatds@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Hawke)
Subject: Re: DRDOS and WIN 3.1 Upper Memory Management
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 01:26:36 GMT

mrmarcel@eos.ncsu.edu (MICHAEL RONN MARCELAIS) writes:

>In article <F3ZQB45V@dri.com>, liberato@dri.com (Jimmy Liberato) writes:
>|> int704v@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Mark Cosham) writes:
>|> 
>|> >mrbill@leland.Stanford.EDU (William Bowen) writes:
>|> 
>|> >>Has anyone had any luck running windows 3.1 using the range B000-B7FF with
>|> >>DR-DOS EMM386.SYS /I-B000-B7FF? I've tried, but windows won't start...
>|> 
>|> >Well, I've had problems with that area too, and I'm running MS-DOS!
>|> >...
 [.sigs and other stuff deleted.]

I had a similar problem when I first installed QEMM.  However,
the QEMM manual said that some SVGA cards use the B000-B7FF
block.  Since my card is a Diamond Speed Star, I would assume
that this is true for all cards using the TS4000 chip...and
probally some others besides.

Doug Kilpatrick
Hawke


Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: jenk@microsoft.com (Jen Kilmer)
Subject: Re: Bugs on smartdrv.exe ??
Date: 27 Sep 92 05:54:57 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation

In article <1992Sep23.152337.2137@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com> walls@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com (Gerald Walls) writes:
>>In article 21102@hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk, b130729@hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk (LAM SIU CHUNG) writes:
>>>		copy autoexec.old autoexec.bat
>>>		reboot   (warm boot the PC utility)
>>>
>>>   It does not work.  
>
>it may be that reboot doesn't cause an interrupt to reboot but
>instead jumps to 0xffff0.  then SmartDrv would have no way of
>knowing to flush.  it is always a good idea to manually flush
>the cache before any autoreboots.

Always a very good idea. FYI, though, smartdrv does detect a 
ctrl-alt-del keypress. 

-jen
From: Louis.Egger@bota.unine.ch
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: PROBLEM: Stacker / Smartdrive
Date: 27 Sep 92 17:24:45 GMT
Organization: University of Neuchatel, Switzerland

Hi!

I'm running into a real GREAT problem...

 Since a few days STACKER is turning me into a mad PC User. >:-[]

 Well i'm going to expose ( as clearly as possible ) my problem.

 I 'Stacked' my Hard disk ( 100 MB -> 200 MB ) and for many months had no 
troubles at all. Recently I put an erase-protect (The EP from Norton) on my 
stacked drive and a disk-cache (SmartDrv.exe from Microsoft) on my uncompressed
drive. It all worked fine for several weeks BUT SUDDENLY my stacked drive get
Write-Protected by the program STACKER and since then i can only read my 
stacked drive (absolutely unpossible to write (or delete) a file on that drive)
8-o

 I re-booted my computer and STACKER reported that the Stackvol.dsk file was
damaged (and therefore write-protected the drive).

 I checked the stacked drive with SCHECK.EXE the answer was that there was just
one lost cluster in an EP file ( but no problems at all on the UNcompressed 
drive ) and that i should first correct CHKDSK /F but it wasn't able to repair
it ( the drive is always write-protected )....
 
 I also tried the Norton Disk Doctor the result was the same: unable
to correct the problem (can't write on that disk).

Help me, i don't want to format my Hard Disk and loose 200 MG of Programs!!

WHAT CAN I DO ????



Louis

  
          %*****%
          !\0-0/!  Ohhhh. Thank you for ANY answer!
          l  U  l   
           \ o /
             -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Louis Egger              !  MBEGGER@CNEDCU51  : Bitnet !   The last wagon in a
Universite de Neuchatel  !------------------------------   train  is  the most
Switzerland              !dangerous of all, and that's why we have removed it!
-------------------------------------Pierre Dac--------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.misc
From: junikka@schaefer.math.wisc.edu (Jari Junikka)
Subject: What is a) ITALIAN ASSISTANT b) OTHER LANGUAGE ASSISTANTS
Organization: Univ. of Wisconsin Dept. of Mathematics
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 08:21:35 GMT

While reading the adds for software in the September isssue of the PC Magazine,
I found ComputAbility sells Italian Assistant for $39.95 (others, too) and
CompuClassics mentions "Language Assistant - Each 4.1 $42.00" in their add.

I was wondering what these are? Tutorials? On grammar, vocabulary or
irregular verbs? Has anyone used them?

I'm in particularly interested in the Italian Assistant.

regards,

jari
(junikka@math.wisc.edu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: lee@ceg.uiuc.edu (Chris Lee)
Subject: Mac emulator for the PC?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:39:49 GMT

Is there a Macintosh emulator for the PC?  If so,
I would like to know about the following:

1. hardware requirements -- memory, display, etc.
2. "compatibility" -- programs, disks, etc.
3. experiences (does it really work?)


I hope this is the right group to post this.

Thanks in advance.
-- 
Chris Lee
University of Illinois Urbana
lee@ceg.uiuc.edu
(217)244-2903
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps