HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann)
Subject: Four More Weeks!
Organization: Society for Putting Things on Top of Other Things
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 03:24:20 GMT

In honor of the Countdown to Put Down the J.Dan, here are some future
activities for Our Boy.


County Fair Ducking Booth Victim--he'll raise a lot of bucks to supplement
our local governments that he helped devastate.

Perpetual Celebrity Golf Tourney Shower-Upper--nuff said.

Family Values Figure--Marilyn will find it easier to get real work as
a lawyer, and someone's got to keep an eye on Corinne.

Commercial Pitchman--"Do you know me?  Chances are you've read about
something stupid I said, if I never had a mind.  But I can spell
"The Card"."
    Amex card has Dan's name typed out:  J. DANFORTH QUAYL
    The final E appears after about five more seconds.

Game Show Host--We know on good authority that Danoe will believe any
answer written on a card.  Contestants have to guess if he told them
the correct answer or if they were right in the first place.



FOUR MORE WEEKS until the    QUAYLE FLUSH!
(I guess BUSH REMOVAL gets qualified under LANDSCAPING.)

-- 
Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer.  Take your pick.

Centigram Communications Corp, San Jose California  408/428-3553
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cortez@milton.u.washington.edu (Tom Warner)
Subject: Re: Would Dannikins have been "in the loop"?
Organization: University of Washington
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 04:14:55 GMT

dks@MIT.EDU (dks) writes:


>In article <5515@news.duke.edu>, eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK) writes:
>> If Iran-Contra happened under a Bush-Quayle administration, how many of you
>> would believe Quayle would be completely ignorant of what was going on?

Count me in on that tally. Whether or not anyone tried to explain it to him.
From: Joe.Francis@dartmouth.edu (Joe Francis)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Tetragrammaton
Date: 30 Sep 92 09:24:34 GMT
 <28SEP92203259@adcalc.fnal.gov>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a5@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <28SEP92203259@adcalc.fnal.gov>
glass@adcalc.fnal.gov (Michael Glass) writes:

> -- Michael  (Notice that the last two letters in my name refer to a diety.)
>             (Maybe this is a sign that I should become a Republican.)

The last three letters of your last name are actually a stronger
indicator.
From: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: debates
Date: 4 Oct 92 22:12:34 GMT
Organization: DSG, Dept. of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin

In <cass8806.299@elan.glassboro.edu> cass8806@elan.glassboro.edu
(KYLE CASSIDY) writes:
>i can barely wait to see our boy dan take on al gore in the debate.
>
>any thoughts on who might win?

It's hard to tell, but... I reckon it will either be Dan Quayle or Al Gore.


Ciaran.
-- 
Ciaran McHale                                                             ----
Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.       \bi/
Telephone: +353-1-7021539 FAX: +353-1-772204 email: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie \/
From: asper@time.sbc.com (Alan E. Asper)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The debate is on?????
Date: 2 Oct 92 19:48:39 GMT
Organization: Southwestern Bell Technology Resources, St.Louis, MO

In article <1992Oct2.185155.21571@netcom.com> madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann) writes:
>9.  The swimsuit competition counts for at least 50% of the debate
>
>-- 
>Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer, Plagiarist.  Take your pick.

The swimsuit joke was on one of Letterman's Top Ten lists.
Better luck next time.
:-)
Alan
From: jmcbride@ccvax.ucd.ie
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: more from the fountain of wisdom that is our Dan
Date: 6 Oct 92 14:04:22 GMT
Organization: University College Dublin

Reading this month's copy of PCPLUS, I came accross a couple of quotes
from the Danster which I hadn't noticed before.  They are printed in
connection with the launch of a new program, The (Unauthorised) Dan
Quayle Spelling Checker:

(On responsibility)  I am not a part of the problem.  I happen to be
a Republican.

(On career choice)  I wanted to be a golf pro, but my family pushed me
into politics.

Not spectacularly amusing, but they give a little insight into our
Dano(e)



james p mc bride      

------------> Europeans for Clinton/Gore '92 <-------------
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle is more charitable than Gore
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 92 14:02:29 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:

> I really doubt, by the way, that Gore, a member of the Senate
> is pulling down less perks than the VP, except perhaps
> in Secret Service protection.

Ah-hem. Excuuuuuse meeeee. What about the official Vice Presidential
residence, which I believe is on the grounds of the old Naval Observatory?
Twelve rooms, six bathrooms, on a twelve-acre parklike estate and comes
with a staff of six navy stewards, who serve as butlers, and other assorted
staff members such as gardeners and cleaning staff. Actually the number
of rooms may be greater now, because Dan recently had the house remodeled
to add space for his kids. He also added a twenty-five thousand dollar
putting green (more than ten times the cost of the one Bush had put in at
the White House, but I guess not surprising, since Marilyn has told us
where his priorities lie with golf), and a huge swimming pool. All of
this was at taxpayer expense of course. Congress, however, denied the
Quayles' request for another fifty thousand to construct vice-presidential
stables on the grounds.

Then there's the matter of Air Force Two, Quayle's own airplane, which
the Associated Press reported was used to carry Quayle to golf outings
at twenty-five thousand dollars per trip.

I don't know what salary Gore makes as a senator, but, as veep, Quayle
made $115,000 in 1989. He now makes $166,200, an increase of 44.5 percent
in less than four years. How many people do you know who have had that
kind of raise during this recession? In addition to his salary, Quayle
receives per year another ten thousand for "expenses", seventy-five
thousand for "entertainment", and a whopping $180,000 for "maintenance"
on the above-mentioned mansion. Must be in pretty bad shape.

Now let's talk about staff. Quayle gets seventy staff people and three
offices, not including his personal servants and secret service protection.
There's also Marilyn's staff, which is something like eight people and
one office.

This could probably go on and on with more minor perks. For example,
there's the time when Manassas National Battlefield Park was supposedly
closed for budgetary reasons and Quayle's wife and daughter went horseback
riding there. But I think you get the idea. No way, no way, do Gore's
perks as a senator add up to anything like Quayle's as veep.

Quote of the day: "First Dan Quayle attacks Murphy Brown as if a television
character were a real person. Then of course, Murphy Brown attacked
Dan Quayle as if he were a real person."  - Kirk Douglas


-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: liuyh@cs.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Hill of Beans
Date: 29 Sep 92 17:48:21 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto

In article <9209271722.AA13251@MIT.EDU> dks@MIT.EDU (dks) writes:
>
>liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu) writes:
>> tertium@milton.u.washington.edu (l boyd) writes:
>> > You spose that face on mars is a monument to JDQ?
>> > After all, there is no sign of *intelligent* life on Mars...
>> 
>> I got an idea, maybe after JDQ died, we can name some dead voclano
>> on Mars "Mount of Quayle" or something.  ;->  that is, the astronomers
>> of tommorrow (I assume they are the spelling bee champions of today)
>> still chuckling about the JDQ quotes.   
>
>Mount of Quayle?  The fool doesn't amount to a Hill of Beans.

in order to get a hill of beans:  we need water, oxygen, canal irrigation,
soil, CO2, sunshine....

Gosh, JDQ must think we can get a hill of beans on Mars.

>
>
>Dhanesh
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: merlyn@digibd.com (Merlyn LeRoy)
Subject: Re: The Bush Quale and Ollie North show
Organization: DigiBoard Incorporated, Eden Prairie, MN
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 17:03:45 GMT

chm011@marshall.wvnet.edu writes:

>Oliver North was at our campus today to campaign for the Republican[s]...
>	Ollie :) was heckled at the start his remarks, but he quickly got
>control of the situation by saying; "Rudeness is not protected by the first
>amendment!"  During his remarks he used a copy of the constitution as a prop

Well, don't he always?

---
Merlyn LeRoy
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: debates
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 20:32:47 GMT

In article <3ec6RB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>cass8806@elan.glassboro.edu (KYLE CASSIDY) writes:
>
>> i can barely wait to see our boy dan take on al gore in the debate.
>>
>> any thoughts on who might win?
>
>That's already been decided.  I'll be interested to see if Our Boy actually
>breaks from his well-rehearsed, scripted lines and comes up with an original
>thought.

What if that thought concerned his 7-Iron?



--
"Sounds interesting....  Sounds interesting...."
				-- Homer Simpson
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:4984 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6354 talk.bizarre:33024
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: A Technical Request
Date: 7 Oct 92 00:09:58 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <1992Oct6.193012.24186@noao.edu> lund@noao.edu (Rich Lund) writes:
>
>drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>: 
>: I have been politiely asked in email to 'dumb down'
>: my posts for the folks in alt.fan.dan-qualye
>: and alt.fan.rush-limbaugh....
>: 
>What the hell are you ragging on Dan and Rush for and including 
>your mindless liberal crap in talk.politics.guns?
>
>Conservatives are way out in front on the RKBA issue and there
>is no way some turn the other cheek-love the criminal more than
>their self-involve government in every aspect of our life Liberal
>son's a bitches like Clinton and Gore are going to fight to protect
>our rights.  Now, Rush and Dan may not be perfect, but at least
>they aren't shoving socialism and big government down our throats.

Patriotically Korrect (tm) aside:  no neurons were
used during the composition of the paragraph above.

And, I don't think Clinton/Gore, Bush/Quayl, or anyone
else would be too successful in shoving anything
down your throat; there seems to be a large
obstruction already in the way.

>Maybe the folks with those "Over Workded little Minds" will be
>the ones to save you from Clinton's gestapo police.  These folks
>with "Over Workded little Minds" might be the ones that don't 
>hand their weapons over to government.  They may become the 
>'Freedom Fighters' during the next decade or provide security
>and stability to a country brought to it's knees by economic 
>collapse.

Ok, you haven't turned your guns over to the government.
Who did you turn your brain over to?

>***************** Ten thousand years from now it won't matter anyway.      
>Rich Lund       *                    Chill out !!
>lund@noao.edu   *
>***************** Opinions not sponsored by my employer etc.etc......

It matters today, and today is all we have.

Please, try to keep this crap out of alt.fan-dan-quayle.

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
From: rone@girtab.usc.edu (Ron Echeverri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: What's the deal?
Date: 6 Oct 92 03:33:20 GMT
Organization: <censored>
NNTP-Posting-Host: girtab.usc.edu

In article <1992Oct4.222251.3951@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>Gee, the name of this group is alt.fan.dan-quayle, but all I see are Quayle
>bashes here.  Could somebody direct me to a group where Republican policies
>and characters are discussed in a more friendly manner?

*plonk*

5150
next!
From: kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bertie Wooster/DQ: One and the same?
Date: 28 Sep 92 23:06:38 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.175147.20298@u.washington.edu>, grimoire@byron.u.washington.edu (John Greer) writes:
> In article <1992Sep25.170836.28026@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> cldavies@nyx.cs.du.edu (cindy davies) writes:
> >In article <1992Sep17.164618.1686@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu> afc@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu writes:
> >>Since there has been too much political argument and too little of
> >>what this group was formed for:
> >>
> >>Has anyone else been struck by the similarities between Bertie Wooster
> >>and Dano?  Both amiable incompetents from outrageously rich families,
> >>bumbling their way through life.  Somehow they both always come out of
> >>their self-imposed difficulties intact, although at the price of a fair
> >>amount of ridicule.
> >>
> >>Sigh.  For the lack of a valet, a country was lost.
> 
> Dannikins as Bertie Wooster?  Yes.  Marilyn as Aunt Agatha?  No, no, no --
> Marilyn _has_ to be Honoria Glossop.  On the other hand, Nancy Reagan does
> a pretty good Were-Aunt.  How about George for Oofy Prosser?
> 
> And, switching series, there's always Newt Gingrich to play Rupert Baxter...
> 

This this fun. Lets work this out,

Dan the Man = Gussie Fink-Nottle (my pick), who else can be convinced
              to stroll in Trafalger Sq. fountain at 4am to look for newts.

Marylin Q = Honoria Glossop; perfect!

Nancy R = Lord Emsworth's dominating sister.. damn.. i forget her name. 
          actually, all his sisters dominate him. anybody?

GHWB = Oofy Prosser, for now. gotta find a better fit, though.

Bill Clinton = Psmith? who else is smoother! 

Baxter = Gingrich. great fit

Still searching for Madeline Basset, Lord Sidcup aka Spode, Soapy
Molloy [Oliver North?], Jeeves [Jim Baker?]..

_______________________________________________________
| Prashanth                    |                      |
| U. of California @ San Diego | prash@raman.ucsd.edu |
#######################################################
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:4924 alt.tasteless:10865
From: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.tasteless
Subject: Re: Dan Doll
Date: 5 Oct 92 16:50:10 GMT
Reply-To: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Followup-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Organization: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
In-reply-to: popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)

In article <sD94RB1w165w@unkaphaed.UUCP>, popec@unkaphaed (William C. Barwell) writes:
>1000 anatomically correct Dan Quayle Dolls.

You can see a picture of the doll, in normal and exposed poses, in the
October issue of HARPER'S.  Talk about your big, uh, smiles.
-- 
-Matthew P Wiener (weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu)
From: sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Our Boy and the Draft...
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 10:45:40 EDT
Organization: Monsoon Software, Inc.

elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:

> For all of Clinton's posturing on the draft, he *did* eventually submit 
> himself to the draft.  He got lucky and drew a high number.  I seriously 
> doubt that anyone will charge that he influenced the lottery in some way. 
> So, whatever he did before that point, he rolled the dice just like 
> everyone else eligible that year.  What he would have done had he drawn a 
> low number is speculation, of course, however, my bet is that he would 
> have gone, given his future political ambitions.

Well, even though I am a Clinton supporter, I still have to point out
that he only made himself available to the draft when it was fairly
certain that there was a very small possibility of induction (of high
or low number receipients). I think the guy should admit that he didn't
want to go to war and used all means at his disposal to avoid doing so.
Then again, this issue really doesn't bother me at all.

Sunil Gupta
Monsoon Software, Inc.
sg@monsoon.com
From: jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. 'TGaPC' Schechner)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: debates
Date: 5 Oct 92 23:30:38 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <3ec6RB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>cass8806@elan.glassboro.edu (KYLE CASSIDY) writes:
>
>> i can barely wait to see our boy dan take on al gore in the debate.
>>
>> any thoughts on who might win?
>
>That's already been decided.  I'll be interested to see if Our Boy actually
>breaks from his well-rehearsed, scripted lines and comes up with an original
>thought.
>
>
>
>
>|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
>|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|


	Shyah, right.  And monkeys may fly outta my butt!!!
'Nuff said!

-Jason

PS: Allow me to be the first to congratulate Maddi on her new position
as moderator of rec.humor.funny!  May she lead the way for more
widespread appreciation of JDQ jokes, at least for the next few
months. :-)

-- 
"Down here on the planet Earth 
They steal your back and leave the shirt.
Pay you a penny and call it a dime and then   -Jason and
Give you a watch when you run out of time."   -the Scorchers 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson)
Subject: Re: The Last Word on "Potatoe".
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 14:21:39 GMT

In <1992Oct6.232817.1@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz> hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Anthony 'SCHWAibo' Hobbs) writes:

>> Yes, there is a big difference.  In the one case, there was a man who
>> had been given the incorrect spelling on a card; in the other case, there
>> was a published report, presumably with spelling checks and proofreaders.
>> 
>> Which one is more excusable?

>Being given the wrong spelling doesn't excuse the man. If he was firing on all
>cylinders, he would have noticed that the spelling was *wrong*. WHY DIDN'T HE?

>Answer: he is DIM. Seriously DIM.

Then he is just as dim as all the people at the Globe & Mail and in
the Canadian federal government who spelled words wrong too!

And in the case of the Globe misspelling "Rae" with "Raee"....talk
about not firing on all cylinders....this is the supposed  "media
elite" here, the same one that *thrashed* Quayle for a dumb mistake.

Now lets see the Globe publicly chastize the goober who misspelled Rae
as badly as they did Quayle, including all the editors and copy
editors who missed such a blatant error.

I think I proved my point here. It doesn't matter who makes what
mistakes where...if Dan Quayle does it, its further proof he's such an
idiot. No matter the media makes the same mistakes he does, they're
excused, he's an idiot. No matter the Canadian government made the
*exact* same mistake he did, they're excused, he's an idiot.

Bah.

Michael
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: mkahlke@snuffy.wa.atk.com (Mike Kahlke)
Subject: Re: Actual Bush/Quayl sticker sighting in Bay Area!
Followup-To: <1992Sep30.224422.15857@dbsun.uucp>
Organization: Alliant TechSystems Inc.
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 21:24:18 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.224422.15857@dbsun.uucp> harbison%dbsun.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu writes:
>I have noticed only a few B/Q stickers here in the St. Louis area.  I
>commute about 20 miles (1-way) each day on I-70 and I-270 through St.
>Charles county (suburbs, leaning Republican) to the outskirts of St.
>Louis County.  I would expect to see more B/Q stickers considering the
>demographics of the area I traverse.  Then again, one thing alot of
>Missourans (?) have in common these days is unemployment.  That might
>explain the sparse distribution of B/Q stickers.
>
>The B/Q sticker I've seen is designed such that the word "Bush" is
>clearly visible from a distance.  However, the word "Quayle" is not
>visible beyond a distance of 10-20 feet.  Could this be an attempt
>to downplay the bottom half of the GOP ticket, or just an artistic
>preference?  If DQ was my running mate, I'd probably have his name
>in a 6 point font (or maybe X11's 'fixed' font). :-)
>
>-- 
>*realName: Phil Harbison
>*mailName: harbison%dbsun.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu
>*phoneList: 314-731-7475 (w) 314-272-9318 (h)

I've noticed the same thing here in the Greater Seattle area.  The word
"Quayle" is in deep red superimposed over the blue word "Bush" (or is it
"'92" or "1992"?)  It is very hard to make out "Quayle" from a distance
of more than a car length away.  Anyways, I've seen more Clinton/Gore stickers
than Bush/Quayle ones here, which comes as no surprise here in the western
half of the state of Washington.

-- 
Mike Kahlke (mkahlke@atk.com), proud father of Seth, born
Wednesday, September 23, 1992 at 7:11 PM PDT
Male, weight 9 lb. 15.4 oz., length 21 1/2 in.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: gpatrick@mprgate.mpr.ca (Greg Patrick)
Subject: Re: quote of the vice prisident
Organization: MPR Teltech Ltd., Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 16:38:05 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.205440.19006@wam.umd.edu>, liuxia@wam.umd.edu (New VaxHacker) writes:
|> I heard someone on the net has a summery of all the interesting sentences
|> said by the Vice Prisident. Could you please send me a copy of this? 
|> 
|> Thanks in advance...
|> 
|> Liu Xia

I had  this file but unwisely deleted the softcopy of it, and  I also can't remember 
who mailed it to me in the first place.  It's been a real hit around the office and I 
keep getting requests for it.

Could someone PLEASE post it to the net for all the a.f.dq newcomers and anyone
else who doesn't have it?  

( or just mail it to me 8^) )

ob. quote: "The holocaust was an obscene period in our nation's
history.  I mean in this century's history.  But we all lived in this century.  I didn't
live in this century." ... V.P. Dan Qauyle
-- 
---------------------------------------
Greg Patrick
MPR Teltech Ltd., Vancouver, BC, Canada
gpatrick@mprgate.mpr.ca
From: popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Dan Doll
Date: 4 Oct 92 11:30:39 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy

Houston Chronicle     
  Politically Correct Too?
 Now how's that for gratitude! The Patagonia Trading Co., which got 
worldwide free publicity when a pixilated Dan Quayle bought it's 
anatomically correct South American Indian doll in front of the 
International pres corps in Chile two years ago, has turned around and 
made, at the request of a mischeivous American businessman, 1000 
anatomically correct Dan Quayle Dolls.  The wooden trinket - complete 
with blue eyes, blonde hair and a red tie - sells for $15.

More Dan.  I wonder that thgere has been so little comment here on this 
group about the return of Gary Trudeau and Doonesbury.  The spectacle of 
Danny the lightweight feather trying to read Al Gore's book, Earth In The 
Balance, and failing is as viciousa s piece of cartooning as I have seen 
in a while.  Poor Dan!   I guess his struggles with Plato gave Trudeau 
the idea to portray Dan as semi-illiterate.

ANd of course, Dans old dealer, Kimberlin, is back in the news as a probe 
into that sorry affair finds that Kimberlin was indeed unfairly harrassed 
by the government for daring to besmirch our Dan's reputation.  I wonder 
if this will come up in the debates!?

--
popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, (713) 943-2728 in Houston, Texas
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle