HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 02:09:42 -0500 
From: Vernon H Harmon <vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Schmidt Computer Rankings through 15-Dec
Distribution: na

Excerpts from netnews.rec.sport.football.pro: 18-Dec-92 Schmidt Computer
Rankings t.. Kevin Todd Schmidt@cco.c (3391)

> Rank Team                      Points  Record Sch. Str.  Last Week   Change
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 5    San_Diego                 74.839   9-5-0  68.375  (  5,  75.192)  +0
> 8    Kansas_City               72.290   9-5-0  70.113  (  6,  73.928)  -2
> 9    Houston                   72.255   8-6-0  68.969  (  7,  73.202)  -2
> 10   Buffalo                   71.148  10-4-0  68.285  ( 14,  70.025)  +4
> 12   LA_Raiders                70.344   6-8-0  69.737  ( 10,  72.791)  -2
> 13   Cleveland                 70.318   7-7-0  68.544  ( 12,  72.146)  -1
> 15   Miami                     70.171   9-5-0  69.610  ( 19,  67.921)  +4
> 17   Pittsburgh                69.883  10-4-0  68.407  (  8,  73.026)  -9
> 18   Denver                    68.744   7-7-0  71.099  ( 13,  70.537)  -5
> 22   Indianapolis              66.206   7-7-0  68.931  ( 22,  65.291)  +0


well, after this week, I'll give you what I would hope youir rankings end
up next week for AFC teams only.

Buffalo (I put Buffalo over SD because their's was a much more impressive
	win)
San Diego (we're in the playoffs!! finally!!)
Miami
Houston & Pittsburgh (we're really hoping Neil is back next week!)
Kansas City & Denver (next week will decide this for me :D)
Cleveland
Indy
LA (man did they suck today)

...but if your rankings keep San Diego above Buffalo, I won't argue :D

--Vernon.
(glad that I'll finally be able to find some SD merchandise in the
stores after this season!!)
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: WASHINGTON SUCKS SHIT!!!
Date: 15 Dec 1992 19:30:25 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <1992Dec15.130716.1@eagle.wesleyan.edu> mzener@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:
>wlittle@dante.nmsu.edu (Wes) writes:
>
[Cowboys & Redskins stuff deleted]

 >   I admit the Redskins did not seem exactly dominant, but they made all they
 >could out of abundant Cowboys mistakes.  It can be said that the Redskins
 >didn't deserve to win, but it can't be said that the Cowboys didn't deserve to
  >lose.
 >
 >Max

A little reverse what if's at the start but I (Major Dallas fan) agree
with what you say, Dallas did control the game for about 57 1/2 minutes.
Folks it a 60 minute game and Dallas didn't do what it took to win,
i.e. protect the ball.

A quote:

" A good team can overcome three major mistakes, anymore than that,
you will lose" Tom Landry (1977)

Dallas made the mistakes (5), they lost. 

Damn that was easy........

It's so easy being humble when your 11-3

Go Cowboys !!!!!
tim

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mcs@cray.com (Mike Sanfratello)
Subject: Lions QB
Organization: Cray Research
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 19:14:26 GMT

Does anyone know who will be playing QB for Detroit this weekend?
Will Ware start again?

mike
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: steven@advtech.uswest.com ( Steve Novak)
Subject: Re: Shouldn't Emmitt's fumble be an incomplete pass?
Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies
Distribution: inet
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:18:06 GMT

> = (Alan Martin) writes:

>Smith picking up the ball and shoveling it forward in an attempt to get the
>ball to (I believe) Alfredo Roberts.  This was undeniably outrageously stupid,
>*BUT*, what I want to know is why wasn't *that* ruled an incomplete pass?

I have a different question.  I saw a replay on MNF last night, and it
sure looks like Smith's knee touched the turf before he "fumbled", which
would have been a safety.  Anyone else agree?

-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Steve Novak |    |"Wacker the K"| 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
steven@advtech.USWest.Com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 12:40:08 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kester@mte.ncsu.edu (Dan Kester)
Subject: Re: Cost of Season Tickets?
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 19:17:12 GMT

	Although I'm not a season ticket holder (Raleigh to Buffalo commute is a bit
long), I believe the ticket prices are $23 for the end zone, and $33 for most
everywhere else  (expect underneath the upper deck, where they are $38.)  There
9 games per season, plus the playoffs.  Considering their level of play it is
an excellent deal, especially when you consider that Sabres tickets cost more! 
(at least on a single game basis).
From: brianm@nachos.EBay.Sun.COM (Brian Mackin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cost of Season Tickets?
Date: 16 Dec 1992 20:13:00 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: brianm@nachos.EBay.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: nachos.ebay.sun.com

In article D1o@encore.com, tolsen@encore.com (Ted Olsen) writes:
> brianm@nachos.EBay.Sun.COM (Brian Mackin) writes:
> 
> >A 49er season ticket costs $35.75/game x 10 games = $357.50, regardless of where
> >you sit (excluding luxury boxes).
> 
> Damn..  I thought Dolphin ticket prices were bad!  When Joe Robbie
> opened up 5 years ago all tickets other then skyboxes and club seats
> were $26.00/game.  Two years or so ago they dropped prices a couple
> dollars on end zone seats and raised tickets a couple dollars on
> some side line seats.  Club seats go for between $60.00 and $120.00/
> game depending on location.  
> 
> Ted
> 


I forgot to mention that $357.50/seat/season is face value...the niners have been
sold out solid since the early 80's which has driven up the "lifetime rights"
to a decent seat into the $5,000-10,000 range.  Fortunately for me, my grandfather
bought eight season tickets on the 45 yd line back in 1946, which my family has
held on to ever since!

Brian
From: vnend@hotlips.Princeton.EDU (David James)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Apology from Princeton
Summary: Sorry about that Chief
Date: 14 Dec 92 17:22:12 GMT
Organization: Princeton University
Originator: news@nimaster

Princeton would like to apologize for the 215 repeats of one of our
users postings to this group.  We became aware of the problem
on Sunday morning, and the loop was killed at that time.  We have
identified the problem and are working on a solution to it now.

Let me stress that the user should not be blamed for this.  There was
a typo in his posting (the subject contained a single backquote) that
broke a spooler script here, causing it to go into a ten minute loop.  After
that it was out of his hands, and we were not made aware of the problem
until Sunday morning.  Until then it was posted every 10 minutes.

Once again, we are aware of the problem, and are fixing tie broken code.

David W. James
news@Princeton.EDU
-- 
Vnend, Lottery winner #316                 Ignorance is the mother of adventure.  
vnend@princeton.edu, vnend@pucc.bitnet, or {backbone}!princeton!nudity!vnend        
        Anonymous posting service (NO FLAMES!):vnend@ms.uky.edu                          
                        " my acronym d'amour..."
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rweisbe@starfleet.nswc.navy.mil 
Subject: Rob Riddick where is he today
Organization: Naval Surface Warfare Center
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:10:00 GMT

   I was wondering what ever happen to Rob Riddick who played
for the Bills sometime in the late 80's.  Is he still playing
today?  Was he injured and never returned?  Did he get picked
up as a plan B player who never made it in another system? 
Anyone know?
From: gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: THE FOOTBALL GODS HAVE SPOKEN!!!
Date: 15 Dec 92 06:27:50 GMT
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO

jg> John Gloria
gs> Gary Strand

gs> All in all, I find that JOHN P. GLORIA's postings have less value than a
    pimple on Babe Laufenberg's butt.
    Basically, just ignore him, like you do when you're on the bus and someone
    cuts a really nasty fart. Soon enough, the smell (GLORIA) will go away.

jg> Gary, your breath stinks, just like your life. 

  [This "flame" is so bad it's laughable. Insulting a person by saying that
   they have halitosis! Struck to the quick! Arrggh! I saw better when I was
   in elementary school and we kids would hurl "potty mouth" at each other!]

jg> I thought I would tell you, since I am not one your friends. 

  State the obvious, why don't you?

jg> Oh, I forgot, you don't have any friends. 

  Like you really know.

jg> Your breath still stinks and no amount of certs or gargling will help you,
    you maggot breath.

  At least Henry Thomas said "penis breath" in E.T. "Maggot breath" just does
  not have quite the same ring or verve to it, does it?

jg> You are just a sore loser 

  Like I said, your posts are *sore*, like the really painful kind.

jg> and I have proved your wrong, you insignificant little blackhead.

  What of mine have you "proved" wrong? My what? 

  Ahh, BTW, it's considered bad flame form to use the same insult back. I 
  gauged your opinions as having less value than a pimple, and now you're 
  calling me a whitehead? Yeah, well, you're a big ol' *boil*, buddy! What
  other disgusting dermatological conditions can we come up with? Diaper
  rash? Eczema? The heartbreak of psoriasis?

jg> If you can dish it out Gary, be prepared to take some.

  Your "dish" is about 1/8 teaspoon. I can withstand such a withering attack.

jg> IN YOUR FACE!

  You've seen the advertisements for ESPN's Sunday Night Football too, eh?

jg> Well, at least 10 feet away. Your breath really does stink like shit Gary.

  Since shit is what comes out of your mouth, you're the one who knows what
  shit smells (and tastes, yummm!) like, sonny.

  Now go home and sit in the corner, little boy. Let's get back to discussing
  football, a man's game. Pity you don't have hair one between your legs when
  it comes to flaming.

--
Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Shouldn't Emmitt's fumble be an incomplete pass?
Date: 15 Dec 1992 15:18:37 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
Distribution: inet
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <1gk9m6INNcf@sauna.cs.hut.fi> Kalle.Kivimaa@hut.fi (Kalle Kivimaa) writes:
 >In <1992Dec14.204607.16427@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu> alan@tsd.arlut.utexas.edu (Alan Martin) writes:
 >>Smith picking up the ball and shoveling it forward in an attempt to get the
 >>ball to (I believe) Alfredo Roberts.  This was undeniably outrageously stupid,
 >>*BUT*, what I want to know is why wasn't *that* ruled an incomplete pass?
 >
 >Was Roberts an eligible receiver?  Was the ball thrown or fumbled
 >towards him?  It could have been a safety even if Smith was

Yes, he's a TE.
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Wilbur Marshall vs Andre Waters vs Emmitt Smith
Date: 17 Dec 92 00:00:55 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes) writes:

>At the tail end of the play into the
>picture came Wilbur Marshall running at full speed.  And there's Emmitt
>Smith going low at Marshall's knees.

Jeez, Joe, isn't there enough Eagles stuff going on these days, that you
have to make these silly comments about Emmitt?

If you've ever seen Emmitt block, which he does frequently (and well, too),
he crouches down low to get his oppenents legs out from underneath him.
He's very good at it; I've seen him flip over any number of Pro Bowl-caliber
outside linemen, keeping them from Troy.  It's one of the things he does
that makes him even more valuable to the team.

Besides, if Wilbur was the one going full speed, how could Emmitt be going
for his knees?  It seems to imply some action on Emmitt's part.

Daniel Welch
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.pro:29032 dc.redskins:279
From: swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Steve Williams)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,dc.redskins
Subject: Re: Washington-Dallas Game Summary
Date: 16 Dec 92 12:45:37 GMT
Reply-To: swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Steve Williams)
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center

In rec.sport.football.pro, swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Steve Williams) writes:

 >                 Washington Redskins vs Dallas Cowboys
 >                             Game Summary
 >                           December 13, 1992

 >                           DALLAS    REDSKINS
 > Interception returns-yards   1-8        3-54  <---- error
					   ^^^^
It should be:                              1-59

That is, A.Collins returned one interception 59 yards in fourth quarter.

My apologies for this error.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Steve Williams                           swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mosko@redwood.math.ucla.edu (Bradley Moskowitz)
Subject: Re: Questions for Viking's fans
Organization: UCLA Mathematics Department
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 01:18:26 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.132400.28325@uc.msc.edu> bob@msc.edu (Robert Hanson) writes:
>1. Do you think MN will win the division?  If yes, how far do you think
>   they will go in the playoffs?
>
I think they'll make it by beating Pittsburgh with Bubby at QB.
In the playoffs I can see them possibly beating Wash or Phil in Minnesota,
but any further than that would be unlikely. But still at this point I'd
be thrilled just with a division title for starters.
>2. With all of the current talk about getting a new QB, who would you  
>   like to see come to MN.  A local radio announcer thought Boomer
>   Esiason would be a good (and available) choice?
>
A 1st round draft pick such as Drew Bledsoe would be best rather than
trading. 
>4. What positions, other than QB, do you think MN will be looking for in
>   the draft?  I personally think they need to bring in a speed receiver.
>
I think speed receiver and/or power running back would be nice. I hope
the Vikes can handle having 1st and 2nd round picks after all these years!!
     - Brad
>				-Bob-
From: mark@totaltec.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Steve Young vs Randall Cunningham
Date: 14 Dec 92 17:48:31 GMT
Distribution: na,usa
Organization: Total Tec Systems, Inc.

In article <1g6p3nINN76s@male.EBay.Sun.COM>, 49ers@eb5ts4.EBay.Sun.COM (Renie Maycon) writes:
> Steve Young is a better QB than Randall Cunningham.
and what do you base this assesment on?
> 
> Steve is more durable than Randall.
dido...how many games has Steve played and how many has Randall played?
> 
> Randall looks more smoother when he scrambles.
looks smoother because he is!
> 
> Randall does not have a good supporting cast.
agreed!
>  
> Steve and the 49ers have a Better defense and offense than randal does.
offense maybe but definitly not defense
> 
> Randall will never win a SuperBowl.
again how have you come to this conclusion
> 
> Randall still can't win the big game when it counts.
he has won a few big games but none in the playoffs 
> 
> Steve makes better passing decisions.
says who?
> 
> Steve is the highest rated QB 107.8  Randall 90.2
> 
> Steve and Joe will win the SuperBowl this year and next year and so one and so
> on and so on.  get my point!!!!!!!!!!!
oh yeah...now I get your point! The 49ers are the best team in pro football 
today, tomorrow, and forever more. The rest of the league should just call it
quits because the MIGTHY 49ERS will win every game from now on till eternity!
Right?
> 
> 
> 
> :
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: frigo@asiago.med.ge.com (Fred Frigo 5-5806)
Subject: Green Bay Packers Playoff Chances 
Reply-To: frigo@opustech.com
Organization: Opus Technologies, Inc. -  Brookfield, WI
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 18:07:31 GMT

Many Packer fans are walking around with short finger-nails,
unable to sleep at night, excited about the prospects the Packers
have of making it into the NFL playoffs.

After the exciting victory over the Oilers on Dec. 13, what
are the Packers chances of getting into the playoffs?  Rather
than read some of the more subjective analysis presented by
others on the net, here is something a bit more objective. 

Let's assume that for any NFL game, the chances for each team 
winnning is equal.  With that in mind, the Packers playoff
aspirations are dependent on their performance and the
performance of three other teams: the Vikings, the Eagles and
the Redskins.

Two previous games have thrown significant weight into the
outcome.  The Packers overtime loss to the Vikings on
opening day has hurt the Packers and helped the Vikings.
The Packers close victory over Philadelphia has hurt the Eagles
and helped the Packers.

Here are all the possibilties (except ties!):

                          PACKERS PLAYOFF PICTURE 
                                                  
=======|========|========|========|========|========|========|========|========
GBvMIN |GGGGGGGG|GGGGGGGG|GGGGGGGG|GGGGGGGG|MMMMMMMM|MMMMMMMM|MMMMMMMM|MMMMMMMM
GBvRAM |GGGGGGGG|GGGGGGGG|RRRRRRRR|RRRRRRRR|GGGGGGGG|GGGGGGGG|RRRRRRRR|RRRRRRRR
MINvPIT|MMMMMMMM|PPPPPPPP|MMMMMMMM|PPPPPPPP|MMMMMMMM|PPPPPPPP|MMMMMMMM|PPPPPPPP
PHIvWAS|PPPPWWWW|PPPPWWWW|PPPPWWWW|PPPPWWWW|PPPPWWWW|PPPPWWWW|PPPPWWWW|PPPPWWWW
PHIvNYG|PPNNPPNN|PPNNPPNN|PPNNPPNN|PPNNPPNN|PPNNPPNN|PPNNPPNN|PPNNPPNN|PPNNPPNN
WASvRAI|WRWRWRWR|WRWRWRWR|WRWRWRWR|WRWRWRWR|WRWRWRWR|WRWRWRWR|WRWRWRWR|WRWRWRWR
=======|========|========|========|========|========|========|========|========
RESULT |XWWWWWWW|DDDDDDDD|XXXXXXWW|XXXXXXWW|XXXXXXWW|XXXXXXWW|XXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXX


W=Wildcard
D=Division Champ
X=Not in playoffs

12.5000% chance of winning the division
23.4375% chance of winning a wildcard
64.0625% chance of being eliminated

Worth Noting:  If the Packers win both Games, they have a 50 percent
chance of winning the Division, and a 43.75 percent chance of making
it in as a wildcard.   In fact the only way they would not make it in
as a wildcard if they win their next 2 games is if Philadelphia wins both, 
and Washington wins vs. the Raiders.


--
Fred Frigo    Opus Technologies, Inc.                 (__)
Voice: (414)-521-0400   FAX: (414)-549-9744           (oo)
E-mail: frigo@opustech.com                    /--------\/  
US-mail: PO Box 717,  Brookfield, WI 53008   * ||-----||
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
Subject: Re: BIlls are READY
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 05:14:56 GMT

In article <1992Dec18.141816.18255@spuddy.uucp> markl@spuddy.uucp (Mark Liversedge) writes:
>In article <1992Dec14.044919.25304@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA) writes:
>
>[stuff about/against Bills ready for superbowl win deleted]
>
>>What do you expect from the crying Jills? They have no
>>idea what it is like to win a SB. They are in a fantasy
>>trip, must be the those mushrooms. I kind of hope they
>>do make it to the SB. The result would be a NFC
>>blowout! Whether it be the Niners, Saints or Cowboys,
>>the stinking Jills would be humilated on national
>>T.V., in front of MILLIONS of views world-wide.
>
>Hey dude, unless you have a ring YOU have no idea what it
>is like to win a SB. 
>
D-U-D-E, I have 4 of them, soon to be FIVE!  I also have, let me
see, 2 High School Football Championships; 2 Co-Championship
(football); 3 HS Basketball Championsips; 3 HS Track & Field
Championships; 1 Co-Championship, Track & Field.  Base Football
Championship, Intra-Mural, USAF - Charleston, AFB (1967); 
Hey, GLORY DAYS!

>
>The Bills beat the 49ers in week 2 when they were  high from a killing
>of the Lams, they may not have "peaked" but they could beat anyone 
>right now. They could also lose to anyone -- just like every other
>team in the NFL.
>
Tell me something I don't already know. :-)  What happened in
week 2 or week 10 is history. There is NO WAY ANY A-F-C team
is going to beat any NFC team in the SB. Only an act by the
FOOTBALL GODS can change this.  Call it woofing dude, but
Homey don't think so. Homey don't play that game. 
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: BEST team wins Re: Dallas vs Skins
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 00:09:46 GMT

In article <matjmm.724714543@gsusgi1.gsu.edu> matjmm@gsusgi1.gsu.edu (J. Morgan Morris) writes:
>Not. Dallas clearly blew the game with the Redskins. Stupid mistakes. 
Mistakes are part of the game. You make a lot of mistakes, I don't. So
who deserves to win?

>Whether Troy 
>fumbled or not, Emmitt should have just sat on it. Although the other
>plays in the game were important, this was most critical, since it put the
>Cowboys behind and they never recovered. I agree with whoever said that
>Dallas lost the game.
Even Emmitt sat on it and gave up a safety, the game wasn't over then.
The Skins would have had the ball in midfield.  Who knows what's going 
to happen next? It's not a cinch that the Boys would have won the game. 
So why speculate?

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com