HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: maas@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl (Frank Maas)
Subject: Combining NETBEUI and TCP/IP (?)
Summary: Does a driver with both protocols exist?
Keywords: tcp/ip, tcp, ip, netbeui, pcnfs, nfs, lanman, Lan Manager
Organization: Delft University of Technology
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 10:07:12 GMT

Dear readers,


First of all, I know this is probably not the correct group for this question,
but I really didn't find a group that suited the subject. And since it is
about a MS-DOS driver...


Problem:
	Currently I'm using a LAN which is connected to both an Unix server and
	an OS/2 server. The first can be reached when I load PC-NFS on my 
	machine. To reach the latter, I have to load NETBEUI (Lan Manager).
	Since I have to access both servers (Unix for E-Mail, connections to the
	world :-), etc; OS/2 for NOTES, Programs, etc), I have to reboot my
	machine each time I want to do something on the other server. Concurrent
	access is not possible.

What I want:
	A driver that implements both the NETBEUI and the PC-NFS layer. So,
	NOTES (which has to use NETBEUI) sees NETBEUI, and telnet sees PC-NFS
	(or TCP/IP to be correct).
	MS Windows should see PC-NFS when MSW is set up for PC-NFS and it 
	should see NETBEUI when it is set up for NETBEUI.

So the question(s):
	Does such a driver exist?
	Did you have the same problem and solved it differently?
	Do you see other solutions?


You can follow-up to this article, but if this is the wrong place, you could 
also mail me.

With Regards (and Best Whishes for '93),

Frank Maas (e-mail: maas@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl)
From: rsl11@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Problems with SMARTDRIVE and PATH
Date: 9 Jan 93 14:16:02 CST
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

Hello there,

	I have the following questions:
1. TO simulate disk cache with dos and windows you can either put the
statements
a) devicehigh=c:\smartdrv.sys     in the config.sys file or
b) loadhigh=c:\smartdrv.exe       in the autoexec.bat file

What is the difference between the 2 statements?
Also, how much cache would be recommended to have with a total of 4MB ram when
you run windows?

2. I have aproblem with the path statement of dos.
If I type the following statement in the dos prompt
PATH = C:\DOS; C:\WINDOWS; C:\STACKER;
in capital letters it works but if I put it in a batch file such as the
autoexec.bat file it tells me "Too many parameters". Does anybody have any
ideas as to what the problem might be?

	I would very much appreciate any relevant response.
Feel free to send mail to
Internet Address:telnet tesla.ece.ukans.edu
or
Internet Address: telnet kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
or
Internet Address: gt0430c@prism.gatech.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us (gordon hlavenka)
Subject: Re: IBM XT upgrade
Organization: Vpnet Public Access
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 03:23:13 GMT

 msprague@superior.mcwbst311b (Mike Sprague) writes:
>...  The needs of a church PC usually cover
>things like word processing and keeping track of records.  A 286 will
>fit the bill quite nicely, and will cost very little.  As long as your
>not trying to use windows, and assuming you want to upgrade the XT,
>a 286 will do quite nicely.  (Well, Windows will work on the 286, but
>what's the point.)

I have to tell a story here:  Our church decided to purchase a couple
of PCs for the pastor and his assistant to use.  I was on the
committee (it's a Presbyterian church :-) which was to select the type
of computer to buy.  I made exactly the recommendation above:  A 286
would be a super deal, all we need is Word Processing and so forth,
just stay away from Windows.

Well, they bought the 286s.  The computer store bundled Windows 3.0
with _every_ system sold.  "As long as we've _got_ it," the pastor
thought, "we might as well run Windows."  |-\  And since they were
running Windows, naturally they bought WordPerfect FOR WINDOWS to run
on them.  Now they complain about how slow the machines are!  And they
can't just scrap Windows because a) they're addicted to the pretty
graphics, and b) they don't have any DOS software. >sigh<

And it gets better/worse.

The pastor went out and bought a new version of Printshop FOR WINDOWS,
and it wouldn't run on his machine.  Why?  Because it needs Windows
3.1!  So, he upgraded his _286_ to Windows 3.1, and it's now even more
slothful than before.  So he traded in the machine on a 386DX/40.

So much for saving money...

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Gordon S. Hlavenka           cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us
Vote straight ticket Procrastination party Dec. 3rd!
Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.misc:6948 comp.archives.msdos.d:462
From: carlos@carlos
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.archives.msdos.d,comps.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Serious PKZip 2.04 Bug - Beware
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 93 21:37:01 -0500
Reply-To: carlos@infoserv.com
Organization: Dominguez UseNet, Brooklyn NY, USA

In <1493wB2w165w@tcscs.UUCP> tcscs!zeta@src.honeywell.com (Gregory Youngblood) writes:

>While I cant say that I have had this error (haven't tried it), it doesn't
>like OS/2 at all, so I dumped it. :(  It is quite buggy it seems.  Even the
>switch to disable DPMI mode still locked on my system. 

>I'll stick to 1.1 for now, and InfoZip for OS/2 in os/2 mode.

It works fine on my system under MSDOS & Windows. Somehow the boys
in Boca Raton may want to be informed about this....


-- 
  ___ ___  __   .   ___  __  //  Carlos Dominguez, MS-DOS Enthusiast !
 /   /__/ /_ ) /   /  / /_  // | carlos@infoserv.com  carlos@dorsai.com
(__ (  / /  \ (__ (__/ __/ ..  | carlos@phantom.com   FIDONET 1:278/706
From: randys@focus.PEN.TEK.COM (Randy A Schafer;627-5729;39-733;tekig5.pen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Printscreen in postscript
Keywords: printscreen tsr postscript
Date: 6 Jan 93 17:33:37 GMT
Reply-To: randys@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tektronix OCI

Does anyone know of a TSR that will replace the current printscreen function and
print the screen contents in postscript format? I already have a program that will
convert regular text files to postscript but I need to be able to dump the screen
in postscript also.

    Thanks.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Randy Scahfer              Optical Communications Instruments Engineering
randys@tektronix.com       Tektronix, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: jig1@inode.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: HOW TO USE '/' INSTEAD OF
Date: 12 Jan 93 08:44:28 EST
Reply-To: jig1@inode.com
Distribution: world
Organization: inode BBS, Usenet Access for NYC (212-679-9146)

S I recall seeing some time ago a description of how to set up MS-DOS so
  it uses '/' instead of '\' for the path separator.  Now that I want to
  do this, I can't find the information, though I've looked all through
  the manual.  Can someone spare a clue?


Yes there was a way, some environmental variable to be defined as /
instead of \, but unfortunately MS-DOS version 5.0 and up will have the
backslash (\) hardcoded so it will be no longer possible to switch.
---
  QMPro 1.01 41-3274  Point not found. A)bort, R)eread, I)gnore.
#! rnews 1
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: szikopou@alfred.carleton.ca (Steven Zikopoulos)
Subject: Dos upgrade from 3.09 to 4.01
Summary: need help upgrading dos
Keywords: dos upgrade
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 05:33:14 GMT

My girlfriend owns a dinsosaur of an IBM compatible.  She purchased it
in 1987 and has lost the manual for it.  I opened it up to install a
modem and it does have an Intel 8088 chip.  So we are definatley
talking XT compat.

I wanted to uprgrade the DOS she's running to 4.01 from 3.09 but
can't.  She has one 5.25" drive and a 20meg internal hard drive.  The
installation always crashes (it just freezes) when I am propted to
switch from the SELECT disk to back to the INSTALL disk.  The manual
says that 4.01 is supported by some XT systems--maybe this isn't one
of them.  Perhaps I have to monkey around with the SYS.CONFIG?

CAN ANYONE OFFER ME ANY ADVICE?

please email
szikopou@ccs.carleton.ca

Thanks
Steven Zikopoulos
Carelton University


Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: pkim@gagme.chi.il.us (Peter Kim)
Subject: Fonts for bank checks. Printing checks on your printer?
Originator: pkim@gagme
Keywords: checks fonts
Organization: Gagme Public Access UNIX, Chicago, Illinois.
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 08:34:24 GMT

I started using Quicken and would like to print my bank checks
on my ink jet printer using regular papers. I read from Chicago
Tribune that someone has done it using MS Word and Canon BJ-10
printer. Where can I get the fonts for the computer codes and
numbers on bank checks?

Thanks.
From: stefan@stanny.GUN.de (Stefan Haefs)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Help: how to connect xt-keyboard to Amstrad PC1512 ???
Date: 4 Jan 93 22:06:29 GMT
Reply-To: stefan@stanny.GUN.de (Stefan Haefs)
Organization: stanny


Hi !

I'm looking for an opportunity to connect a normal xt-keyboard to the
Amstrad/ Schneider PC 1512.
This PC has a different connector than the normal xt because there's
a joystick port added in the keyboard.

Does anybody know how to connect the xt-keyboard-pins to the PC 1512-pins' ??
If there's no way please tell it to me anyway.

Thanks
Stefan Haefs

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Haefs                                  INTERNET stefan@stanny.GUN.de
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: bathurst@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Bruce Bathurst)
Subject: Re: Using DD disks as HD disks?
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: disks, disk drive
Organization: Princeton University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 20:57:57 GMT

(I tried a tape backup once, but it soon overheated my Walkman.)

I've been slow to answer, because I'm sure I once read an ad for a
device to make holes in 3.5" disks, but I can't find it now.

Bruce (Gypsy Scholar)
-- 
Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
bathurst@phoenix.princeton.edu bathurst@pucc.bitnet !princeton!phoenix!bathurst
From: worley@a.cs.okstate.edu (WORLEY LAWRENCE JA)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Using DD disks as HD disks?
Date: 13 Jan 93 00:18:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: a.1993Jan13.001856.16143
Organization: Oklahoma State University

From article <93012.37231.LJ01066@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM>, by LJ01066@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM:
> 
>>In article <1992Dec30.104013.28558@Princeton.EDU>,
>>bathurst@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Bruce Bathurst) writes:
>>|>HD diskettes are coated,
>>|>like DD, but then polished more to reduce surface bumps that would
>>|>produce magnetic irregularities.  This thins the coating.  The lower
>>|>density drive is designed to penetrate a thick coating with
>>|>magnetism;
>>|>when it does this to the thin coating, the magntic domains grow
>>|>sideways rather than downward and may interfere with other tracks.
>>|>
> 
>>From this and other things said, can I use (cheaper) 3 1/2 DD disks in my HD
>>drive without problems?   Assuming I ADD THE SECOND HOLE?
> 
> Rebuttle: Although the below statement is somewhat correct, it should be
> pointed out that dd and hd disk median is not the same.  The drive head
> current used to write to the disk depends on what disk the computer thinks
> it's writing to. Although you can convert dd to hd via below method and
> you may not ever expierence problems, for a master copy of some data you
> risk loosing it over time.  Hdensity head current is lower than dd and the
> dd median is designed for a higher current. Despite that some people feel
> disk makers are using the same disk but charging us more for hd is not
> true. Also they really don't check the unused side of a dd disk.
                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I must disagree with you about this last statement.  A 3 1/2" DD disk (which
the original writer was referring to) uses BOTH sides of the disk, not one
side.  Now, in the "old" days (Atari 8-bit, C-64, TRS-80) the diskettes were
single or double sided, and you could punch out your single-sided 5 1/4" and
use both sides.  You may have a point, perhaps the manufacturers of THOSE
diskettes didn't check BOTH sides of a single-sided disk, but 720K DD 3 1/2"
certainly are tested on both sides (because the USE both sides)!

-Jason
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: rene@hal.et.tudelft.nl (Rene Bodenstaff)
Subject: Re: Keyboard error. please help
Organization: Delft University of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 12:22:28 GMT

In article <wk81wB1w165w@tcscs.UUCP>, tcscs!zeta@src.honeywell.com (Gregory Youngblood) writes:
> My server has started having problems...it keeps getting a keyboard error.
> I've tried another keyboard and it does it again.
> 
> It is a Keytronics keyboard, and was serviced and cleaned in 92, and has been
> working fine until today when this started.
> 
> Is there a keyboard controller on motherboards? Or is it all contained in
> keyboards?  We're looking to figure out if the motherboard could be shot, or
> if the keyboards are the problem. 
> 
  
  Most errors are caused by bad connections. Check your cable from the key
  board to the PC. Check de DIN connector (female) on your motherboard.
  Check the soldering of this connector. 

  I have had all kind of trouble with my keyboard (beeping at power up,
  missing keystrokes, etc.) and it always boild down to a rotten connection
  somewhere. 

  Something about the keyboard controller. The keyboard itself is equiped 
  with a microcontroller, which handles your keyboard input. It is controlled
  by your PC via a simple _language_. (You could program your keyboard your-
  self, and let the LEDs flash impressively on your deck... :-) ). It is not
  likely that the error can be found there.

       ---< Sonic says: "more haste is more speed" >---
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: Ray.Chramega <Ray.Chramega@mixcom.mixcom.com>
Subject: Re: Using DD disks as HD disks?
Organization: Milwaukee Internet Xchange BBS, Milwaukee, WI U.S.A.
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 18:45:48 GMT
Keywords: disks, disk drive

In <1993Jan5.001013.15268@engage.pko.dec.com> ssmith@ncdel.enet.dec.com (Sheldon E. Smith) writes:


>In article <1992Dec30.104013.28558@Princeton.EDU>,
>bathurst@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Bruce Bathurst) writes:
>|>HD diskettes are coated,
>|>like DD, but then polished more to reduce surface bumps that would
>|>produce magnetic irregularities.  This thins the coating.  The lower
>|>density drive is designed to penetrate a thick coating with
>|>magnetism;
>|>when it does this to the thin coating, the magntic domains grow
>|>sideways rather than downward and may interfere with other tracks.
>|>

>From this and other things said, can I use (cheaper) 3 1/2 DD disks in my HD
>drive without problems?   Assuming I ADD THE SECOND HOLE?

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Sheldon E. Smith			!Email:
>Digital Equipment Corporation		! ssmith%ncdel.enet.dec@decwrl.dec.com
>Minneapolis, Minnesota			! ...!decwrl!ncdel.enet.dec.com!ssmith
>=================================================================================
>                        Vote for Picard & Riker in '96

 I bought a really nice 3 1/2" disk conversion tool from "THE SOFTWARE LABS"
at 3767 Overland Avenue #112, Los Angeles, CA. 90034-6311. Their phone
number is (800) 359-9998. It's made of heavy guage, deep drawn steel and is
endorsed by COMPUTE and PC LAPTOP magazines. I've converted hundreds of
disks that I use all the time and have had no problems at all with their
performance. The conversion tool is the best computer utility I own. I
wouldn't worry at all about backing up a hard drive on converted disks that
were made using this tool. The only caution they make is that certain disks
are constructed with flimsy shells and may crack under the preasure of the
tool. I've had no problems with bulk disks from CompUSA, MidWest Micro or
brands such as Fuji, Maxell or Sony. It's worth your time to try this
miracle utilty at all costs.

-- 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Email: chramega@mixcom.COM or mmwwmm@mixcom.COM
From: gblin@mcs.drexel.edu (Bin Lin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: How to read MAC disks on PC?
Date: 5 Jan 93 18:05:49 GMT
Organization: Drexel University


Does anyone out there know how to read a MAC disk on 
a PC? I know MAC can read/convert PC disk/file with
Apple File Exchage. But it's done on MAC. I would
really like this to be done on a PC, even I have to
pay for the software and hardware. Please help!

Thanks in advance!

Bin.

PS: Sorry if this is in FQA. I have seen this question
be asked couple of times. But I didn't read them.

-- 
Bin Lin
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
Drexel University
Philadelphia, PA 19104
From: aki@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Proto-T (Was Re: PKZip 3.05 VIRUS LETTER FROM LAST FALL)
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 93 08:28:11 PST
Reply-To: aki@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us

In article <188@complex.complex.is>, frisk@complex.is (Fridrik Skulason) writes:
> worley@a.cs.okstate.edu (WORLEY LAWRENCE JA) writes:
> 
> >  I have received several requests for me to post this.  It is a copy of
> >some e-mail I received on approximately 10-15-92.  I circulated a few copies
> >around at the time, and most people regarded it as a hoax.
> 
> It is.   There is a virus called Proto-T, but it is just a variant of the
> Civil War II virus, and was detected as such (at least by some anti-virus
> programs such as my own F-PROT) when it was discovered.  The virus found in
> some hacked versions of PkZip is a different one - totally unrelated.
> 


 
Nobody told me that it's already April 1st!
 
From now on it's not a hardware failure. It's the PROTO-T!
YES! A great way for every consultant to squeeze 3-6 hours
of work on EVERY "infected" unit! Fantastic.
 
But seriously guys... unattached file chains on the HD don't
get run. You can't run code out of a modem and you don't have
serial port buffer (I <<WISH>> we did; would have saved tons
of time 7 years back). HD buffer memory gets overwritten each
time a sector is loaded or written. Video memory gets ZERO'D
everytime the card changes mode (although it does represent a
possible, but very tricky, location for viruses).  95% of the
PROTO-T thing is fiction.
 
Aki.
-- 
/  Phone: 408-662 9664   Fax: 662 9676  |  586 is a 586 no matter what  \ 
\  125 Searidge Ct #D, Aptos, CA 95003  |  Intel seez.  "Pent... WHAT?" /
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: adam@microware.com (Adam Goldberg)
Subject: Re: Info about EMM386 and DOS=HIGH wanted!!!
Organization: Microware Systems Corp., Des Moines, Iowa
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 14:30:46 GMT

S_BUCK@rzmain.rz.uni-ulm.de (Buck Martin) writes:

>First, the question about EMM386:
>What is the use of its L=xxxx switch? I know it's used to reserve a
>certain amount of extended memory, but why do I have to use this
>switch? When I have 3Mb of extended memory and want to use 1Mb of it
>as expanded memory, I write: EMM386 1024 RAM. Is it true, that in
>this case EMM386 takes the whole 3Mb of extended memory, changes 1 Mb
>to expanded memory and leaves the other 2Mb unused (and inaccessi-
>ble)? If so, what is the reason for this? If not, how does it really
>work?

I can't find any reference to the L option in the DOS 5.0 reference
manual.  The only options I see mentioned are RAM and NOEMS (plus the
obvious size).  When you say 1024 RAM, you are providing 1Mb of EMS
memory (minus any memory which gets mapped into the 640-1Mb area).
The rest is XMS (if you've loaded HIMEM).

>I'd also like to know, if there is any (shareware) expanded-memory-
>manager for the 386 that doesn't switch the CPU to virtual mode (if
>this is possible at all). If such an emulator exists, where can I get
>it from?

It's my understanding that it is possible (under particular chipsets
only) to map memory from >1Mb into the area 640-1Mb.  ie, provide UMBs
without going into V86 mode.  It would be then possible to emulate EMS
using XMS, although I don't believe this has been written (yet).  I
don't really see the point, though.

>My third question is about the DOS=HIGH feature when using HIMEM.SYS:
>Is there any possibility to prevent Mess-DOS from using the HMA if
>there is a DOS=HIGH statement in the CONFIG.SYS? As far as I know,
>DOS prescans the CONFIG.SYS before loading any drivers and searches
>for a DOS=HIGH statement. If the last DOS= statement is DOS=HIGH,
>then DOS reserves the HMA as soon as it becomes available (after
>loading HIMEM.SYS).
>Does anybody know, how to force DOS into low memory though there is a
>DOS=HIGH statement (it must be possible; I've seen 2 multi-configura-
>tion-programs doing this)?

You betcha.  Write a device driver which allocates the HMA, load it
after HIMEM.  When DOS is done processing the Config.sys, it tries to
allocate the HMA itself--if it has already been allocated, it loads
low.  You then need to free the HMA in your Autoexec (so someone else
can use it).

-- 
Adam G.
adamg@microware.com, or ...!uunet!mcrware!adamg
The above is not to be construed in any way as the official or unofficial
statements of Microware, or any Microware employees.
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: bathurst@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Bruce Bathurst)
Subject: Re: Dos upgrade from 3.09 to 4.01
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: dos upgrade
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 10:25:15 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.000106.17939@dmp.csiro.au> lachlan@dmp.csiro.au
(Lachlan Cranswick) writes:

>leo@rulhp2.leidenuniv.nl (L. Mekenkamp) writes:

>>>My girlfriend owns a dinsosaur of an IBM compatible...

[SNIP, SNIP]

>>Not neccecarily; you just *might* have a real indestructible IMB-PC.

Yeah!, that's right. My PC's are my 1982 IBM PC, a 1985 UNIX PC, and a
Toshiba 1000 laptop.  By "dinosaur", you were no doubt refering to the
indestructible nature of the IBM.

My IBM PC has been flipped on and off daily for 11 years without one
problem.  It runs the MKS toolkit over DOS 3.3, and does just fine at
matrix calculations in APL (with Fortran calls).  It runs its applications
(including TeX and XyWrite) and a graphics tablet without a problem.

[Last night I fixed a friend's new state-of-the-art clone.  Pins and
gravity slots hold the backplane in place, so if the case were turned
it would fall out.  No problem, for the system had been mounted
upside-down in the case in order to put the fan at the top, where it
should be.  All that holds the backplane (with its 80486dx) in place
are the accessory boards.]

For someone who uses COMMAND.COM and DOS's accessory commands, the
only upgrade that would make sense would be to 4DOS.  But if the PC is
short on necessary tuning tools, such as a disk cache and
defragmenter, DR-DOS 6.0 might a bargain.  Otherwise, why change a
tool if it works?

Bruce Bathurst (Gypsy Scholar)
-- 
Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
bathurst@phoenix.princeton.edu bathurst@pucc.bitnet !princeton!phoenix!bathurst
From: hartman@ulogic.UUCP (Richard M. Hartman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Wanted: QIC-40 driver / library / info
Date: 8 Jan 93 19:06:44 GMT
Organization: negligable

I have a Mountain QIC-40 tape drive and I want to be able
to write to it myself instead of being restricted to using
the backup program that came with it.  Does anyone know where
some source code or documentation can be found that illustrates
how to talk to a QIC-40 device?


		-Richard Hartman
		hartman@uLogic.COM

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Disco isn't dead...			...it's just in witness protection!