HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: uhhyung@baram.kaist.ac.kr (Uhhyung Choi)
Subject: A test posting ()
Organization: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 92 12:17:39 GMT

   .

 ,


Newsgroups: gnu.gnusenet.test
From: uhhyung@baram.kaist.ac.kr (Uhhyung Choi)
Subject: A test posting ()
Organization: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 92 12:18:49 GMT

.

Xref: sparky gnu.gnusenet.test:214 vmsnet.test:539 misc.test:10775 alt.fan.warlord:6409
Newsgroups: gnu.gnusenet.test,vmsnet.test,misc.test,alt.fan.warlord
Subject: Re: male caucasian, brown hair, late 20's no reply ignore 
From: dlr@testeng.ksc.nasa.gov (Doug Reed)
Date: 14 Sep 92 14:58:20 EST
Organization: Voice Systems Engineering, Kennedy Space Center

test

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doug Reed / N4QVY                     "My views are my views"
3065 Board Test Engineer              dlr@testeng.ksc.nasa.gov
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: gnu.gnusenet.test
From: chan@hawkingjpmorgan.com (Milo A. Chan)
Subject: test post
Keywords: test, ignore
Organization: J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 17:57:33 GMT

this is a test : Mon Sep  7 13:57:16 EDT 1992

-- 
Milo Chan,  Fixed Income Market Strategies,  J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
email:   chan_milo@jpmorgan.com    ...or...   chan@fractl.tn.cornell.edu
phone:   212.648.4483              ...or...          212.648.4486 (sec'y)
Newsgroups: gnu.gnusenet.test
From: chan@hawking.jpmorgan.com (Milo A. Chan)
Subject: testing; please ignore
Organization: J. P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 18:46:03 GMT


Please ignore.  Testing, 1-2-3.
Mon Sep  7 13:45:54 1992
--
Milo Chan,  Fixed Income Market Strategies,  J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
email:   chan_milo@jpmorgan.com    ...or...   chan@fractl.tn.cornell.edu
phone:   212.648.4483              ...or...          212.648.4486 (sec'y)
Xref: sparky gnu.gnusenet.test:212 gnu.test:36
From: news@zoad.com (USENET Admin)
Newsgroups: gnu.gnusenet.test,gnu.test
Subject: TEST
Date: 8 Sep 92 17:38:49 GMT

OrganizationZoad, a division of SOULS

TEST		TEST			TEST

-- 
USENET Administration			news@zoad.com
Zoad Network Systems			{uunet,sol}!watmat!baqual!zoad
Leadbet, NY
Newsgroups: gnu.gnusenet.test
From: jharris@eadinb.erim.org (Jon Harris)
Subject: test
Organization: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Date: 9 Sep 92 20:13:02

This is a test.  Did I got out there?  If so please e-mail me.
Thanks

Jon
Newsgroups: gnu.gnusenet.test
From: uhhyung@bee.kaist.ac.kr (Uhhyung Choi)
Subject: A Second Test
Originator: uhhyung@bee.kaist.ac.kr
Organization: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 92 08:40:01 GMT

This is a second test for alt.korean.text.
You can read the Hangul message here if you convert it with iso2ks
which is avaliable from BARAM.KAIST.AC.KR via anonymous ftp.
Please report Korean users the result of your site to the newsgroup
soc.culture.korean.
Thanks a bunch!

Uhhyung Choi
CS Dept., KAIST

$)C@L0M@: 5N9xB0 =CGh@T4O4Y.
@L GQ1[@: ISO2022 conformant manner7N @NDZ5e 5G>z@>4O4Y.

CV?lG|
GQ190zGP1b<z?x @|;jGP0z
From: sandipan@sdd.hp.com (Sandipan Bhanot)
Newsgroups: gnu.gnusenet.config
Subject: Problems with GS2.5 drivers on PC
Date: 14 Sep 1992 17:40:50 -0700
Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
Distribution: gnu
NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdl138.sdd.hp.com

I am using Ghostscript2.5 (compiled locally) on 486PC and I am not able to
print the ghostscript files on my Laserjet IID printer. The driver
is installed, and the printer is connected to the default port as the
default device.
The transcript of the session folows :

----------------------------------------------------------------------
C:\GS>gs -sDEVICE=ljet2p tiger.ps
Initializing... done.
Unrecoverable error: VMerror in array
Operand stack:
    12  estack  --nostringval--
Ghostscript: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Could anybody prescribe a pill ...

Thanks in advance,

-- 

-sb
From: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: copyleftappleout
Date: 8 Sep 92 17:28:59 GMT
Reply-To: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Organization: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
In-reply-to: shebs@apple.com (Stan Shebs)

In article <shebs-040992103318@delos.apple.com>, shebs@apple (Stan Shebs) writes:
>Of course, there are now no "Apple legal maneuvers" to defend against, and
>the only suggested condition for ending the boycott has been for Apple to
>publicly forswear any future lawsuits, [...]

Instead of ending the boycott, enforce a boycott.  It's a bit late, but a
change from copyleft to copyleftappleout on all future GNU releases would
be interesting.
-- 
-Matthew P Wiener (weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu)    If Apple owned
 NBC, they would sue Nike for comedy-interface copyright violation.
From: frain@cis.ksu.edu (Jerry Frain)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: "official" FSF position on apple
Date: 16 Sep 92 01:14:26 GMT
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: depot.cis.ksu.edu

frain@cis.ksu.edu (Jerry Frain) writes:

> dreier@lhasa.berkeley.edu (Roland Dreier) writes:

> > So let me get this straight: Apple sued people, claiming their
> > copyrights were infringed.  This, of course, was evil and perfectly
> > valid grounds for a boycott.  USL is in the process of suing some
> > people, claiming that their copyrights were infringed.  Of course,
> > this is completely understandable and we shouldn't hold it against
> > them.

> It is not just why Apple or USL is suing, it is more an issue of
> exactly what has been copyrighted.

> Apple has copyrighted the "look and feel" of their Macintosh
> interface.  The GPL does not believe that the "look and feel" of a

For some reason, I chose to misuse acronyms, and place GPLs throughout
my posting, where LPFs should have been.  Sorry for the confusion (time
to get some sleep, before I post something else stupid).

  --Jerry Frain, frain@cis.ksu.edu
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
From: dmatiske@caravaggio.helios.nd.edu (david matiskella)
Subject: Re: "official" FSF position on apple
Reply-To: dmatiske@caravaggio.helios.nd.edu (david matiskella)
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:48:45 GMT

In article <frain.716570605@depot.cis.ksu.edu.cis.ksu.edu>, frain@cis.ksu.edu (Jerry Frain) writes:
|> anthony@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Anthony J Stieber) writes:
|> 
|> > They charge $2000 for a computer that costs $400 to make.  It sounds
|> > like they make a lot more money on their hardware than software.
|> 
|> This is only blatantly obvious, since every computer manufacturing
|> company in the world does it.
|> 
|> Sure, once you have the schematics and the parts list, the machine is
|> actually quite cheap.  But a lot of research and development goes into
|> getting these two things.
|> 
|> Let's not forget to mention that the consumer also has to pay for the
|> marketing of the product, and probably a half-dozen other things I'm
|> forgetting to mention.
|> 
	Well I once heard that it coust around $800 bucks to make a sun. They sell them for 10,000. Sounds like a major mark up. 
	However the main problem with proting GNU stuff to the mac is that most of them will require major rewrites. They are not designed around an event driven architechure. The ones that have been ported generally require MPW which simulates a lot of unix  calls.
	
Xref: sparky gnu.misc.discuss:2920 comp.org.eff.talk:5690 comp.unix.bsd:5167 comp.os.mach:1181 misc.int-property:925 alt.suit.att-bsdi:253
From: trier@odin.ins.cwru.edu (Stephen C. Trier)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach,misc.int-property,alt.suit.att-bsdi
Subject: Re: AT&T Long Distance Boycott (was: BNR2SS, Mach, and The Lawsuit)
Date: 5 Sep 1992 12:43:06 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Distribution: inet
NNTP-Posting-Host: odin.ins.cwru.edu

In article <1992Sep4.234429.18294@newsgate.sps.mot.com> dichter@chdasic.sps.mot.com (Carl Dichter) writes:
>Actually, NET2 was the first release from CSRG (the BSD people) that did not
>require a license from ATT/USL. 

Net/2 is not "the first release...that did not require a license".  It is,
however, the largest and most complete such release.  It is the first from
which one could reasonably construct a complete operating system.

CSRG also released the smaller, license-free Networking 1, which is so
far not involved in the lawsuit.

-- 
"Beware of programmers who     Stephen Trier
 carry screwdrivers."          Network Services Engineering, IRIS/INS/Telecom
       Leonard Brandwein       Case Western Reserve University
                               trier@ins.cwru.edu
Xref: sparky gnu.misc.discuss:2975 comp.org.eff.talk:5761 comp.unix.bsd:5428 comp.os.mach:1221 misc.int-property:943 alt.suit.att-bsdi:275
From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach,misc.int-property,alt.suit.att-bsdi
Subject: Re: Are you sure UNIX is a trade mark?
Date: 10 Sep 92 03:10:47 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: gandalf.think.com

In article <1992Sep10.015507.27974@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes:
>	The "glee" comes from the appearance of endorsement of an apparent
>"common use" of the term by non-critical mention of it in an official AT&T
>document.  Since it was an official document, it state a position by AT&T
>on the matter by it's reference.

I didn't see an endorsement of the common misuse of the term, I saw an
acknowledgement of it.  The purpose of a sentence that says, "BSD Unix is
commonly called Berkeley Unix," serves the purpose of clarifying things for
readers who have heard the term "Berkeley Unix".  As much as AT&T and USL
try to assert their trademark, they live in the real world and must deal
with the fact that many people use the shorthand "Berkeley Unix".

-- 
Barry Margolin
System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com          {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach,misc.int-property,alt.suit.att-bsdi
From: glenn@scooptram.utcs.utoronto.ca (Glenn Mackintosh)
Subject: Re: Are you sure UNIX is a trade mark?
Organization: UTCS Campus Access
Distribution: inet
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 23:39:09 GMT

In <1992Sep11.123540.19263@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu (Greg Trotter) writes:

>Asprin and Lineoleum were once brand names. But common usage (that's us,
>dude) dictated that the brands had become generic. Specifically, in the
>case of Aspirin, there were other companies selling the drug (under the
>name (I hope I spell this right) acetacylic pain releiver), but only
>the trademark holder, Bayer, could use the name Asprin. Eventually,
>someone else used the name Asprin. Bayer sued, and *lost* because they
>had not taken appropriate steps to express Asprin as a brand name instead
>of just a plain ol' noun.

>Greg Trotter -- Norman, Oklahoma
>greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu

I don't know about Linoleum but you're mistaken about what happened with
Asprin. I just read this in a trivia bit in the Toronto Star newspaper the
other day. I tried to dig it up just now and couldn't find it, however I can
give you the gist of the story. Basically, before the second world war Asprin
was a trademark of a German company called something Bayer or Bayer something
(it could be A.G. Bayer as you say in your article but it doesn't sound like
the name I don't remember :-). Anyway, after the war the allies for some
reason, the article didn't say why, demanded that the trademark be released
as part of Germany's war reparations. In some countries Bayer later
successfully challenged this and regained the trademark status but failed in
others. For example, the trademark is apparently good in Canada but not in
the U.S.

You could be part right, that in the U.S. they may have lost the suit to
reclaim the trademark because it had become "a plain ol' noun" during the
period that the trademark had been relinquished. However, I doubt that this
example is a particularly good precedent. The Linoleum example may be more
relevant but I don't know anything about it so I can't say.

                             Glenn Mackintosh
                             University of Toronto

INTERNET: glenn@onet.on.ca, UUCP: uunet!utcs!glenn, BITNET: glenn@utorgpu


Xref: sparky gnu.misc.discuss:2967 comp.org.eff.talk:5747 comp.unix.bsd:5406 comp.os.mach:1214
From: jym@mica.berkeley.edu (Jym Dyer)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach
Subject: Socially-Responsible Long Distance (was: AT&T Long Distance Boycott)
Date: 9 Sep 92 12:34:30
Organization: The Naughty Peahen Party Line
Distribution: na
	<MJB.92Sep1163324@oak7.doc.ic.ac.uk>
	<1992Sep2.134252.4475@Warren.MENTORG.COM>
	<CKD.92Sep2105324@loiosh.eff.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: ckd@eff.org's message of 2 Sep 92 14:53:27 GMT

> There's always Sprint; heck, they've even heard of data
> networking . . .

=o= You can get a user interface to Sprint that's especially
socially responsible:  Working Assets Long Distance.  They
have nice features like:

    o Donating profits to socially reponsible nonprofit
      groups.

    o Bills come in on 100% post-consumer recycled
      unbleached paper.

    o They help you write letters to various people in power.
      For a small fee they'll send telexes for you.  Or, one
      day a month, you can call them for free.

I've found them cheaper than AT&T for my purposes (basically,
I call friends all over the United States on a regular basis).

=o= I think Working Assets is a profit-making venture, though
my interest is their assistance of non-profit groups.  In any
case, I'm not associated with Working Assets (except as a
satisfied customer), this isn't an ad, I'm not paid to say
this, etc.

=o= You can switch to Working Assets Long Distance by calling
them at 1-800/CITIXEN.
    <_Jym_>

P.S.:  I've had prior reasons for dumping AT&T.  Basically I
switched over from them when they withdrew charitable support
to Planned Parenthood because of fundamentalist criticism over
the abortion issue.
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,rec.photo
From: mcgregoa@cognos.com (Alayne McGregor)
Subject: Re: Time to boycott Photo CD
Organization: Cognos Incorporated, Ottawa CANADA
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 16:46:01 GMT

In article <BURLEY.92Sep5160246@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu> burley@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Craig Burley) writes:
>Also, the more publicly understood the concept being distributed, the more
>able it is to flexibly adapt to varying needs, and the less likely it
>is to contain dangerous bugs.  (Think of that Xray machine or whatever that
>turned out to have a software bug that killed several people -- if that
>code had been published as free software several months _before_ the
>machine was released, along with an offer of a total of, say, $100K reward
>money to all those who find any serious bugs in the code prior to the machine's
>release, would those victims be alive today?  I think so!  Would the machine
>have ever been made under such circumstances?  It's remotely possible it
>wouldn't have, but then those people would be alive just the same.  It's
>very reasonable to consider legislating that any software that controls or
>monitors any equipment that is actively capable of killing or seriously
>injuring people must be published as PD, GPL, or similar software along with
>announcements asking the public to examine the software for life-threatening
>bugs.  That oughtn't to hurt companies, since they're primarily making
>sophisticated hardware with simple controlling software, and unfortunately
>hiring simple software programmers to do the latter task. :-)

Faulty analogy.

The problem with the Therac-25 radiation (not X-ray) machine was, from what I've
read, both a hardware and software problem. The software malfunctioned in
not correctly calculating the intensity of the radiation in certain unusual cases;
the hardware interlocks that should have prevented this level of radiation
from reaching the patient did not react fast enough.

Furthermore, the problem only showed up if an operator entered an incorrect value
and corrected that value within a few seconds. This kind of timing problem is
*not* easy to find just by reading code.

Furthermore, while I certainly might be interested in the quality of
software controlling my local nuclear power plant (for example), I doubt
that I or many other people have the 6 months free to audit that code.
Be realistic!

Alayne McGregor
mcgregoa@cognos.com
alayne@ve3pak.ocunix.on.ca

Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach
From: morse@quark.mpr.ca (Daryl Morse)
Subject: Re: Socially-Responsible Long Distance (was: AT&T Long Distance Boycott)
Organization: MPR Teltech Ltd., Burnaby, BC, Canada.
	<1992Sep2.134252.4475@Warren.MENTORG.COM>
	<CKD.92Sep2105324@loiosh.eff.org>
	<JYM.92Sep9123430@remarque.berkeley.edu>
	<FOX.92Sep10084758@graphics.nyu.edu> <MORSE.92Sep10093729@quark.mpr.ca>
Distribution: na
Date: 10 Sep 92 09:52:35


In article <MORSE.92Sep10093729@quark.mpr.ca> morse@quark.mpr.ca (Daryl Morse) writes:

[complaint about discussion on social responsibility in comp.os.mach deleted]

Open mouth, insert foot... I neglected to notice that comp.os.mach was
only one of several groups in which the above-mentioned discussion was
taking place. My post should have only been directed to that newsgroup!

Sorry.

--
Daryl Morse                     | Voice  : (604) 293-5476
MPR Teltech Ltd. 		| Fax    : (604) 293-5787
8999 Nelson Way, Burnaby, BC    | E-Mail : morse@mpr.ca
Canada, V5A 4B5                 |        : mprgate.mpr.ca!morse@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach,misc.int-property,alt.suit.att-bsdi
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
Subject: Re: Are you sure UNIX is a trade mark?
Organization: Weber State University  (Ogden, UT)
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 01:55:07 GMT

In article <BRUNER.92Sep8172455@sp15.csrd.uiuc.edu> bruner@sp15.csrd.uiuc.edu (John Bruner) writes:
>I don't understand the glee that some have expressed in finding a
>mention of "Berkeley UNIX" in a SVR4 manual.  This has no effect upon
>the trademark status of the term "UNIX", especially because I would be
>willing to bet that the manual explicitly points out the trademark
>status of "UNIX" in at least one place.

	The "glee" comes from the appearance of endorsement of an apparent
"common use" of the term by non-critical mention of it in an official AT&T
document.  Since it was an official document, it state a position by AT&T
on the matter by it's reference.

	Unless Berkeley was licensed to use the trademark (as well as the
32V source product), it's likely that non-recognition of the "common use"
status of the UNIX trademark by AT&T would not hold up.


					Terry Lambert
					terry_lambert@gateway.novell.com
					terry@icarus.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       terry@icarus.weber.edu
 "I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: rossini@biosun4.harvard.edu (Anthony Rossini)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: "official" FSF position on apple
Date: 15 Sep 92 14:23:54 GMT
	<1992Sep15.033710.13698@tamsun.tamu.edu>
	<1992Sep15.042744.1220@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Organization: Biostat Dept, HSPH, Boston MA, USA.
In-reply-to: gsh7w@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU's message of 15 Sep 92 04:27:44 GMT


Oh, come on.   This is getting sick.

If you are mad because people aren't creating free software for you, FSF's
policy gives you the opportunity to take the source and port it to an Apple
product.  If you don't like it the "political agenda" (or a certain subset),
take the source and port it.  If you don't have time or ability, set up an
Apple-ish FSF, get everyone to donate a few bucks, buy a programmer, and you
won't have to deal with the parts of the political agenda that you don't
like.  And you will get good software, hopefully.  I'm assuming, right or
wrong, that the basic philosophy of the copyleft is fairly agreeable, even
if you don't buy into some of the potential ramifications.

Isn't the source code enough?  If you want handholding, talk to Apple and
shell out the bucks...

-tony


--
Anthony Rossini       -       rossini@biostat.harvard.edu
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health
677 Huntington Ave, Boston MA 02115  617-432-1056
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
From: hollaar%basset.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Lee Hollaar)
Subject: Re: Are you sure UNIX is a trade mark?
Date: 7 Sep 92 12:07:31 MDT
Summary: Correcting typical net misinformation
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept

In article <1859@adagio.UUCP> grog@adagio.UUCP (Greg Lehey) writes:
> ... Leave
>the name UNIX AT&T, USL or whatever they call themselves this week,
>and refer to the operating system family as Unix. Trademarks are
>case-sensitive.

From the section on filing requirements in "Basic Facts About Trademarks" from
the United States Patent and Trademark Office:
  "If the drawing [showing the mark to be registered] is in typewritten
  form, the mark _must_ be typed entirely in CAPITAL LETTERS.  [Emphasis
  in the original.]  Capital letters must be used even if the mark, as
  used, includes lower-case letters."

More importantly, it is likely that confusion would result between the uses
of UNIX and Unix, so the different capitalization would fail one of the
fundamental tests for trademark infringement.
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
From: aardvark@nt1l.krl.com (Donald Koch)
Subject: Re: Gripe with Bison code (and a suggested fix...)
Organization: Koch Research Labs
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 06:04:01 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.041540.10477@tamsun.tamu.edu>, bpb9204@tamsun.tamu.edu (Brent) writes:
> 
> I have a problem with some of the Bison code (version 1.18).  Not the
> generated code, but bison's source.
> 
> For instance, here is a little jewel of coding wizardy.  It can be also
> labeled as, "how to do variable args when you don't know how."

More correctly, "how to do variable args when the compiler can't."  Remember,
not all C compilers are created equal.

> This is totally ridiculous!  Of course, my compiler is probably the only one
> that chokes on this (because x1-x8 have no type declared), but that's 
> irrelevant.  This coding style is what gives C such a bad name (OK,
> *one* of the things), not to mention all the extra parameters that
> have to be passed to sprintf every time it's called, even if they are zero.

C has a good name? :-)  If you think this is a bad example, wander over to
alt.sources; the winners of the '92 C Obfuscation Contest just got posted.

> Here is the fixed code:
[...]

You might try throwing in a few #ifdef's for those compilers that can't handle
varargs but can handle the extra arguments.

> I am going to go through and fix this function throughout the source.  
> 
> I am willing to distribute the fixed code, provided the FSF, et al will
> accept code modifications from a Macintosh. 

Hmmm... I'll consider it. :-)  (Not like they would ever consider my opinion
worth anything.)  I'm sure there is a note in one of the README/ChangeLog/whatever
files stating where to send suggested fixes.
-- 
Don Koch
aardvark@nt1l.krl.com
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss