HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
Subject: POOF! The carriage turn back into a PUMKIN!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 00:04:16 GMT

AFC Divisional Playoff (JAN 10, 1993)

FINAL SCORE:  Chargers  0   Dolphin  31

Scoring summary:

SCORE:  Chargers  0   Dolphin  0

1st QTR:

Burp, just got back from a platefull of pancakes,
eggs and sausage. Oh yeah, and 3 cups of coffee.
Eh, looks like a defensive game on both sides.

2nd QTR:

SCORE: Dolphin  0

Troy Vincent INT's Humphries at the S.D. 48, intended for Miller.
TO led to a subsequent TD...passes to Humphrey (screen),
to Duper and runs by Humphrey.....Marino, fake to Humphrey,
pass to Page, wide open in the end zone, TD.

SCORE:  Chargers  0  Dolphin   7

Nate Lewis great return of 32 yds....

1-10 HO to Bienemy, up the middle 1st down.  
1-10 Pass to Lewis, who was NOT looking.. 2-10 pass to Lewis, 
6 yds 3-4 pass, deep right to Lewis, drops it! Good D by Troy
Vincent!  PUNT

INT'd by Troy Vincent again on a tipped pass by Nate Lewis.
Major TO, again!

Marino to Duper, right sideline, 1st down, inside the 10.
1-GOAL Marino drops back, passes to Keith Jackson, wide open,
left corner of end zone! What DEFENSE!!!!  TWO INT's, 14 points!

SCORE:  Chargers  0  Dolphin   14

INT by COX off a Humphries pass!! 3 INT's! There is more
that raining coming down on the BOLTS!

MAN OH MAN, what a pass from Marino to Keith Jackson making
a circus catch for a TD, deep middle to a stretching Jackson!
THREE INT's, THREE TOUCHDOWNS!!!

SCORE:  Chargers  0   Dolphin  21

3rd QTR:

SCORE:  Chargers  0   Dolphin  21

Final seconds of the 3rd QTR and the FISH in control of the game

4th QTR:	

Stoyanovich 22 FG attempt, GOOD!

SCORE:  Chargers  0   Dolphin  24

HO to Craver, runs wide left, stumbles, rumbles, sliding, 
cutting, bulldozing tacklers, FALLING INTO THE end zone! 
TOUCHDOWN run of 25 yds! CRAVER WHO?????

SCORE:  Chargers  0   Dolphin  31


Louis Oliver INT'd Humphries pass. 

Another TO by the Chargers, FUMBLE! name left off to prevent 
further humiliation! :-( 

Oops, Miami FUMBLES, Charger recover...too little, too late!

Next Sunday, Bills VS Miami.....shootout galore expected!
This game is a toss-up! If Marino is on AND their Defense
is up to it, then I give the FISH the edge. Either way,
the best two teams from the respective leagues will be
playing for the Championship's next week!

GO NINERS!!!!!!!!!!!!
-- 
"A cynic is one who never sees a good quality in a man,
and never fails to see a bad one. He is the human owl,
vigilant in darkness and blind to light, mousing for
vermin, and never seeing noble game."  Henry Ward Beecher
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rscott@ra.csc.ti.com (Roderick Scott)
Subject: Re: "The Catch" (WAS: Randall, Emmitt, and "The Catch")
Organization: Texas Instruments
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:37:11 GMT

In article <1993Jan12.160134.19141@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> stamber@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Kevin L. Stamber) writes:
>In article <IK.93Jan12074335@puffin.ctt.bellcore.com>, ik@puffin.ctt.bellcore.com (Ik Su Yoo ) writes:
>> 
>> In article <1993Jan11.190027.14379@ncsu.edu> mcanders@eos.ncsu.edu  writes:
>> 
>> > I too cheered for the Niners over the skins' because as much as
>> > I wanted home field for da Boyz, "The Catch" devistated me (I was
>> > only 7 but believe me it did) and I have wanted a chance at the
>> > Niners ever since.
>> > 
>> > Over/Under on TV replays of "The Catch" this week is currently 40.
>> > I saw it 9 times yesterday alone.
>> > 
>> 
>> Why does the media and everybody else only talk about "The Catch"? If I
>> remember correctly, after the catch was made by Clark Kent, there was
>> almost a minute left in the game (55 seconds I think). Sure enough, D.
>> White was marching down the field soon afterwards, until...  "Hacksaw"
>> Reynolds sacked him and caused a fumble near the midfield. IMO, the
>> sack/fumble was as an important play, since Dallas only needed a field goal
>> to win. Does anyone else remember that part of the championship game?
>> --
>> 
>> Ik Su Yoo
>> RRC-4F728, x5764
>> ik@mobydick.leis.bellcore.com
>
>     Does anyone else remember the controversy over Montana then taking the
>ball and running out of his own end zone before time expired; some thought 
>that it should have been called a safety; this play was replayed for two
>days nearly as much as "The Catch".
>
>Kevin L. Stamber
>Purdue University
>Book 'em, Dano!
>

The Game Was Called By The Referee, Plus Montana Was Not Required To Run 
Another Play, Because Of The Game Clock.  That's Why Montana Picked Up The 
Ball An Exit Through His End Zone..
--
From: gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Is there one HONEST Bills fan?
Date: 5 Jan 93 14:29:54 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University


>Yeah, what the hell was that *** LINE JUDGE *** looking at anyways,
>geez.
>
Somebody left Madonna's new book on the sideline.
-- 

------------------------
|   Gail A. Fullman    |
|   Manager - ADMO     |
|   Ext. 83113         |
------------------------
From: tdonnell@ncrsoph.Sophia.NCR.COM (Tom Donnelly)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Parsells to Patriots???
Date: 12 Jan 93 13:27:44 GMT
Reply-To: tdonnell@ncrsoph.Sophia.NCR.COM (Tom Donnelly)
Organization: NCR European Development Center

In article <Adriene_Nazaretian.105.0@QM.cis.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!) writes:
>Subj. says it all....
>
 I would hate to see Bill go anywhere that isn't New York, and coach a team that
 doesn't wear blue.  But if he had to go to New England I guess it would be ok.

>Anyone else catch wind of this.  It was in my local paper.
>It does make sense.  NE needs someone to "take the bull by the horns".  
>Parsells is the man to do it.  Its a good fit for a team to rebuild.
>
>(There was also more info on D. Wannstedt for the Giants coaching job... 
>Droooooooool!)  He says he is ready and WANTS to be offered the job, but 
>Giants havent approached him yet.   I know we are waiting for Dallas to 
>finish their season, but this is DRIVING ME NUTS.

 From what I have read, Wannstedt could be a good coach for the Giants.  Lets
 see what happens after the playoffs.

>
>Also Reeves contacted Young to make a pitch for the job.  Paper said he 
>wanted to dispell any rumors that he wanted partial control of the head 
>office or more control than Young was willing to give.
>
>Should we give him serious thought?  NOT!!!!!! IMHO.
>

 I have to agree with you here.  Reeves is partly responsible for the decline
 of the Broncos, as he was in almost total control of the team.  Also, I don't
 think his stratgies would fit well with the Giant's design.  The Giants are
 a heavy defense, run it through them offense.  Reeves is a no - defense,
 big play offense strategist.  I would probably get ulcers watching the Giants
 play his style of football.

>ALN

TD - GO GIANTS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These views are my own and do not represent those of my company.
No gaurantee, implied or other, unless specified by law. Details on back.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Donnelly               | WIN: Tom.Donnelly@Sophia
NCR Europe Group ISS       | UUCP: ..ncrcom!ncrsoph!tdonnell
Sophia Antipolis, Valbonne |                              
France			   | TEL: 33-92 94 45 40


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M)
Subject: Re: SF Bashing
Reply-To: dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 15:41:43 GMT
Keywords: SF, Philadelphia, Dallas ...

In article <1iepppINNcmv@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds) writes:
>In article <1id26qINNbov@spim.mti.sgi.com> anjaneya@m20_anjaneya.mti.sgi.com (Anjaneya Thakar) writes:
>>
>>
>>>skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds) .... writes
>>
>>>Candlestick IS NOT a good place tp play, a stupid city that builds a 
>>>stadium three feet below sea level .... a lot of bull shit deleted
>>> >
>>Here is a guy with real class!!! He picks on the quality of the stadium
>>to show why 49ers are not a good team ... go figure!!!! They won 4 Super
>>Bowls which were NOT played at the Candlestick.
>
>I said nothing about the team, the 9ers are one of the most respected 
>organizations in the NFL. It's a shame they dont have their own arena
>to play in. How many SB's do you have to win to get a nice stadium ?

Actually, aside from the 49ers telling San Francisco that they want
various improvements to the Stick (enclosed boxes, stuff like that)
there has been little critisism of the stadium.  The 49ers like
grass.  The team has both a grass and artificial surface practice
field.  What they don't like is sharing the Stick with the Giants.
Since the Giants want another field, the 49ers are likely to get
the Stick to themselves.

>The field at the stick is HORRIBLE, it's always soggy and muddy.

Your team should get use to the Stick.  Many times in the past,
(and hopefully many times in the future) the road to the
SuperBowl goes through Candelstick Park!

>
>As for your attacks on me,
>Piss off
>
>tim


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rustcat@leland.Stanford.EDU (Vallury Prabhakar)
Subject: Fwd article (Subject: Cowboys slow to donate ball to sick children)
Organization: CDR, Stanford University
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 93 19:46:19 GMT

From nntp.Stanford.EDU!stanford.edu!lll-winken!looking!clarinews Fri Jan  8 11:43:55 PST 1993
Article: 6034 of clari.sports.football
Xref: nntp.Stanford.EDU clari.sports.football:6034 clari.local.virginia+dc:836 clari.local.texas:4484 clari.local.california:5364 clari.news.interest.people:8175
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Keywords: football, men's professional, broadcast, people, human interest
Date: 8 Jan 93 11:47:44 GMT
Location: virginia, texas, california
ACategory: sports
Slugword: fbn-footballs
Priority: regular
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 376/371; Id: z2036; Sel: vasf; Adate: 1-8-645aes
Codes: ysfprva., ysfprtx., ysfprca., bnhprva.
Note: (nxs, calif., texas, d.c.)


	VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (UPI) -- The Dallas Cowboys, who had refused to
donate an autographed football to two gravely ill children, finally
coughed it up.
	Holly Symons, 12, and her brother Dougie, 10, suffer from
metachromatic leukodystrophy, a degenerative disease that affects the
lining of the brain. Their chances of survival are problematic.
	The two children thought it would be nice to have autographed balls
from all 28 National Football League teams. The Hampton Roads Make-A-
Wish Foundation chapter put in the request to the teams, and 21 have
complied. Five other teams have told Candie Palen, executive director of
the local chapter, that the balls are on the way or are being signed.
	But the responses from Dallas, the Los Angeles Raiders and the
Washington Redskins stunned Palen. The Redskins, Raiders and Cowboys
originally refused to send the footballs.
	The Redskins and Raiders finally coughed up the balls when they
fielded press inquiries on the foot-dragging.
	The Cowboys stood firm in their refusal -- until yesterday. Cowboys
publicist Rich Dalrymple said it was all a big misunderstanding.
	Dalrymple told the Richmond Times-Dispatch that the team fields
hundreds of appeals weekly for footballs, and can't carry out every one,
and therefore punts them all. Dalrymple suggested that the other NFL
clubs hold the same policy.
	When he learned that 21 other clubs have donated footballs, the
Raiders had agreed to cough up one and the other five clubs had told
Make-A-Wish that they were processing the appeal, Dalrymple said: ``I
guess we could see if we could make an exception to our policy. Chances
are the balls may already be on the way.''
	Moments later, Dalrymple told the newspaper that the Cowboys indeed
would honor the request. In fact, the team was honoring it all along,
and it was his fault for the misunderstanding.
	Palen said she doesn't want to jeopardize the relationship the
Cowboys have with the Dallas Make-A-Wish office, because they do have a
relationship with them.
	``I don't want to make anyone angry or get anyone in trouble,'' she
said. ``If we're getting the balls, that's great.''


-- 
Eighty percent of air pollution comes from plants and trees. -- Ronald Reagan, famous movie star
 
== rustcat@sunrise.stanford.edu ==
== Office #:    [415] 725-0163  ==
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: daugherb@b8.b8.ingr.com (Bruce Daugherty)
Subject: Re: THE RETURN OF CRAP FOOTBALL
Organization: Intergraph
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 18:23:10 GMT

In article <1993Jan6.131408.1@vaxa.strath.ac.uk>, clg292@vaxa.strath.ac.uk writes:
> For the regular readers of this newsgroup, some of you might remember
> a couple a artilcles written intiled crap football, well it's back after
> a long absence.
> American footballers are nothing but a bunch of pumped up junkies.To call
> it a sport is an injustice to all proper sports.It seems to me more of
> a competition to see who can take the most steroids without killing 
> themselves, or getting caught.Well actually the chance of getting caught
> is remote as the teams and the N.F.L seem to condone the the use of these
> drugs, and are doing little to stop it.
> What's the punishment for being the best college footballer and getting
> caught using drugs? You get a mult-million dollar contract for one of
> the best teams in the country.Call me stupid, but it's hardly
> a deterent.
> It's time drugs abuse was stoped in football.Then again if
> they did that there would'nt be any decent players left.Without drugs
> your guys would'nt even get a game for a school rugby team over here.
> American Football is a sport? for wimps, and poofs without the commitment
> to make it without drugs.
> So chew on that you self-serving, arogant illigitimates.
> 
> Real men play soccer
> 
> Hamish



**  Oh I just love those cute little shorts!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Re: Blackout in Buffalo
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date:  5 JAN 93 15:49:31    

In article <1993Jan5.195704.9298@ultb.isc.rit.edu>, sbs9276@ritvax.isc.rit.edu writes...

>      The Bills drew 75000+ fans-- the most of any team in the
>NFL playoffs last weekend only to get blacked out and the NFL
>will NOT sell the rights of the game to local TV stations to show
>it in its entirety. So the NFL instead has made a 1 hr. highlight
>film it is selling in this area (no kidding) to the local TV
>stations. And boy am I glad I saw it in person (and have
>relatives in Chicago who taped it!).
> 
>      Oh yeah-- the Bills are the 2nd smallest TV market in the NFL.
>Anyone know the smallest? Denver? Cleveland?

Ah, I think that would be Green Bay -- by a mile.

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: TOP TEN MADDENISMS
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 17:52:36 GMT

OK, my turn -

A few years ago, in a Niners playoff game (I think it was the '89 NFC
title game vs. the Lambs), late in the game, Roger Craig and Rathman
were congratulating each other on great performances.  Both were 
totally muddy and grass-stained, with the obligatory blood in places.
John said, "Now you see there two guys who've played in a real
football game, not one of those things you see in a dome -- or in a 
sushi bar."

What makes him tick I'll never know, but he's the closest thing to
Yogi Berra we've got.

-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
From: anjaneya@m20_anjaneya.mti.sgi.com (Anjaneya Thakar)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: SF Bashing
Date: 5 Jan 1993 19:06:27 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: anjaneya@m20_anjaneya.mti.sgi.com (Anjaneya Thakar)
NNTP-Posting-Host: m20_anjaneya.mti.sgi.com
Keywords: SF, Philadelphia, Dallas ...






What is with these guys in Philadelphia and Dallas anyway? Once in the last
ten years their teams have a reasonable record and instead of enjoying the
good times they are spending all their steam trying to convince everyone why
the 49ers are not good!!!!!

For this one single reason I hope that the 49ers (or the 'Skins) kick thier
butts back to the very cellar they crawled out of! 

A majority of commentrators, sports editors, coaches, players - and not just
the 49er fans - are saying that this is the team to beat. They can't all be
wrong. 49ers are GOOD!

No matter how you guys try to confuse issues - NFC East is strong, your teams
had injuries, 49ers had an easy schedule (NOT!!), Candlestick is not a good
place to play football etc. etc. - the bottom line is that the 49ers have a
solid team and a solid overall organization (maybe only the 'Skins have any
-thing similar). 

49ers will  remain a strong contender for, at least, another 4-5 years and
you guys will have to win here to get to the Super Bowl!!! So instead of bad-
mouthing the 49ers go figure how you can beat them and, then, you may have
earned the right to gloat.

What a goddamned bunch of cry-babies!!!!!!

-anjaneya

-- 
**************************************************************************
Anjaneya Thakar, MIPS Technologies Inc.,(415)390-4136 anjaneya@mti.sgi.com
**************************************************************************
From: perez@seismo.CSS.GOV (Ricardo L. Perez)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Relatively Few Posts from 9ers/Redskins Fans
Date: 8 Jan 93 14:14:20 GMT
Distribution: usa

In article <1993Jan7.222908.4997@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu>, jangi@ccs.northeastern.edu (Shrirang Jangi) writes:
> I think the reason why 9ers/Skins fans do not raise as much cheap talk as do
> the Eagles/Cowboys fans is because the former fans are at ease with 
> themselves. For 9ers fans, they know that 49ers are a much stronger team (on
> paper at least) and I'm sure they're feeling pretty confident. For Skins fans,
> they know that Redskins might be able to beat the 49ers, but by a fairly long
> shot; if Skins win, great; if they lose, they're expected to anyway. I think
> the Skins fans will be willing to concede to losing to a better team but are
> confident that next season they shall be good again. If winning is highly
> probable (in 49er's case), or losing is acceptable (in Redskins' case), then
> there's really no need for fans to argue.

As far as I'm concerned you're pretty close in your assessment
on how most long-time Skins feel.  The 49ers appear to be damn
good.  The attitude is that we have to play great to win.  We
have to do our best to keep the ball from 49er offense. That
means we have to run the ball a lot.  The reason I said you're
pretty close in your assessment is that in our hearts we don't
believe it's a "fairly long shot".  We just know that 49ers
should be favored to win.

Rick P.
- - - - -

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: CCP17BK@AUDUCADM.DUC.AUBURN.EDU (Bill Kelly)
Subject: Re: steve walsh deal
Reply-To: kellywh@mail.auburn.edu
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 22:20:00 GMT

In article <C0Fyo9.9n2@abode.ttank.com>,
eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett) writes:

>In article <19930105080120CCP17BK@AUDUCADM.DUC.AUBURN.EDU> kellywh@mail.auburn.edu writes:
>>In article <1993Jan4.193904.16603@micom.com>,
>>jscott@micom.com (James Scott) writes:
>>As far as I'm concerned, that trade was one of the dumbest things
>>Jim Finks has done while with the Saints.  Don't get me wrong -
>>overall, I think Finks and Mora have worked miracles for us.  But
>>Walsh was (like Torretta is) another over-rated Miami quarterback,
>>Johnson knew it, and he took us to the cleaners.
>
>No, Finks took Finks to the cleaners. Johnson made a good trade as far as the
>Cowboys are concerned. I doubt that Johnson told Finks that Walsh was the
>greatest thing since sliced bread. If he was he would have been the Cowboys
>quarterback. Was is it if someone makes a good trade he is accused of ripping
>off the other team?
>
>Eric
>

Heck, I've got nothing against Johnson for what happened - that's the name
of the game!  Wheel, deal, and the more you can rip off the other team
the better a GM/coach you are!  Johnson took us to the cleaners, and it's
our fault for letting him do it.  Maybe we'll get a chance to do it to
somebody else somewhere down the road :-)

Bill
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M)
Subject: Re: No Cowboys 'D' in Pro Bowl
Reply-To: dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 15:33:58 GMT

In article <C0E44z.6MM@abode.ttank.com> eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett) writes:
>In article <1993Jan4.161421.21691@Arco.COM> kmelcher@rafael.Arco.COM writes:
>>
>>>Hmm...would you get rid of Jeffcoat, Tolbert, and Casillas for Reggie White?
>>
>>IN A HEARTBEAT!!!!! (and I bet the JJ's would, too!) 
>
>Not what I heard! I heard that the JJ's are NOT going to be interested in
>getting Reggie White when he becomes a free agent because they do not want to
>pay what they think he will want. He may want to play for Dallas, the 49'rs or
>the other team that was mentioned that I can't think of, but who is going to
>want to pay $4,000,000 a season? Not the Cowboys.

I doubt that any team (even our 49ers :-)) are going to pay $4M for
a defensive lineman who is right at the top of his game and will be
starting the inevitable long slide down.  Especially when Rice
(the best paid non-QB in the NFL) "only" makes 3M.  However, I would
love to see White in the Red&Gold of the 49ers!

>
>Cheers,
>
>Eric
>
>-- 
>
>		Internet: eric@abode.ttank.com
>		    uucp: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!wvus!abode!eric
>


From: garyr@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM (Gary Rosen)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 04:03:00 GMT
Subject: Re: POOF! The carriage turn back into a PUMKIN!
Organization: HP Stanford Park - Palo Alto, CA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro

>Frank Bilotti <frank@wanda.princeton.edu> /  4:23 pm  Jan 10, 1993 /

>Unfortunately, I wasn't able to see the final playoff blowout of the day.
> How did the fins overcome the loss of Offerdahl.  It always seemed to me
>(as a casual observer) that he was the main man for that defense.  I know
>that the Fins D is much improved, but a shutout without their best
>linebacker?  What happened in this game?

I'm not a 'Fin fan and didn't even see that much of the game, but from
what I saw it looked like San Diego finally played down to their
potential, especially Humphries.  I had suspected the Chargers were
overrated and taking advantage of a fifth place schedule.

I hope this doesn't sound like *too* much of a flame - S. D. made a
great improvement this year regardless of their schedule and should be
congratulated.  But apparently they're not quite ready yet.

- Gary Rosen
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kaufman@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Ken Kaufman)
Subject: Re: Dan Reeves wants to go to Chicagao.
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 17:56:37 GMT

In article <1ictqtINNett@crcnis1.unl.edu> shiva@cse.unl.edu (V. Sivaramakrishnan) writes:

>Dan Reeves' comments on Ditka's firing:

>" It is a shame if this news is indeed true.
>  But I would be interested in the job !!!".


No no no, everyone's got it the backwards.

Ditka should go to Denver.  Just think of all the fun he and Elway could
have together :-D


[This is the latest sports fantasy of my SO, who spent 18 years in Denver
 and came to detest the Broncos]

==Ken