From: rerhk@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Roko Kim 2-4224)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.korean
Subject: Open letter to GMT(2)
Date: 21 Aug 92 07:07:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: hsdndev.1753
Distribution: soc.culture.korean
Organization: Harvard Medical School


Dear Denny,
   From the beginning of your reply, you were saying a lie again. 
    You never explained that you made a mistake in sending your F-words to specific person before your reply, did you? Was there anybody who knew that in s.c.k.? However, you pretended to have explained and apologised for that before, which you hadn't.  I am sorry I should say you are a liar; and a frequent liar again. I am sorry I cannot find other good word for you. That is because you are trying in vain to justify your habitual mistakes (you name it an unintentioanl mistakes, while  I name it dishonesty





, lie, arrogance), I think. 
 It is none of my business to care about your mistakes, while those do not bother me or other netters in s.c.k. Unfortunately you hurt us by your mistakes that I illustrated before.  I do not want to repeat the same  words. However as you really do not catch what I pointed out, it would be my responsibility to explain again. 
 
   You are playing back an old boring record repeatedly, that sings 'it was not my fault,
if any, it was an UNintentional one.  Don't accuse me of those unintentional 
faults'. 
  Just as you are  tired of your verbigerations, I am also  feeling boresome of 
dealing your articles.  Anyway, you asked me a public apology (in an article to a Korean netter), ha?  Ha Ha!!
Shoud I apologize to you because I quoted your dirty words like 'F*ck y*u a**h***' in public?
You admitted   those words written by yourself in s.c.j. and s.c.k. (or any other newsgroup you may not remember). And that word was only for Woong-ki ( I remember the person who you write 'Woong-li' as this) in s.c.j. and not for other Korean netters. 
Because I am not you, I don't know nor care what your motivation to do such a thing would be.  But I care about your behavior done in this net.  
As you admitted, it might have been a mistake to send that kind of article to innocent netters. What was your first reaction to your own mistake when such a Unintentioanl mistake was recognized by you? Was it a kind of sorry word? I remember that you suspected innocent netters in this newsgroup ( Yes, you cleatly wrote 'someone in this neswsgroup;') and threatened to sue!
It was not until my open letter was posted when you wrote about your mistake (Again your unintentional).  Just as it was not until you were disclosed to have Chenes last name by other netter when you wrote about your Chinese blood).
Before that?  You didn't care how netters in this s.c.k. feel about your words.  You pretended to be a non-Chinese.  Even after you admitted that your parents were Chinese, you still denied your racial identity.  
     As I mentioned in my letter(1), it was really tribial thing wheter you were a Chinese or Korean in this S.C.K.  There should be NO discrimination on s.c.k. as for the racial identity of netters.  That is why it doesn't matter to be Chinese or Korean here.  But, you may the only one who call it as a violation of privacy to be known to others as you are. 
    When some netter pointed out you should be a Chinese, s/he was right because you were borne to Chinese parents!  Is it wrong to call anybody a Chinese because one's parent were Chinese?  
    I think it is a kind of 'distorting the truth'to conceal the truth and propagate non-truth. That was what you exactly did in your articles. You did it in the name of privacy or ignorance.
Anyway I understand why you got angry when you read my letter.  I was too proud of myself and my country to endure your insults, right?  I am sorry for telling the truth of your behavior in this newsgroup.  While I read your mention about my mentality, I became concerned about your mental health.  Therefore, for the sake of your sanity, I would apologize in public for my telling the truth.  (It remind me of Gallileo something..)
So, it's time for me ask onething.
I ask you a public apology for your lying on Korean people.  You said as if you had any scientific observations/measurements supporting your idea  that Koreans are so much proud of them as compared to Chinese of Americans. I am sure that it should be a lie.  Ooo, even you mentioned about social science and something like economics.  A lie that was spoken  in the name of science. 
(All you said about your scientific evidence was about your personal viewpoint! An opinion that came from what you saw and observed. You named it a science.  Generalizing from observations, you dare to call it a kind of science; Ooooo, Scientists in the World, Let's Worship the God of Science, Grand Master of Science!  What he saw and what he heard in his life is now called as a Science!  O Brave New World of Denny is now HERE!!)
There has never been an 'average Korean who were willing to and eveready to wield UZI (O you can even observe others' mind ha!) in inner cities of Korea' you could observe through American mass media.  Just as you made a lie by writing your own sentence from suspicious memory, you repeated invention of non-truth as if it were a fact.  You never saw nor heard thhose average Koreans (Why ? In Korea, any citizen except policemen or army iis not allowed to keep a gun at all.  Even an air rifle should be regist





ered to police station.  
      How about machine gun? You will be imprisoned more than a year, at least. Therefore, All you said about this was literally a LIE, you a LIAR. Because we call a person who says a lie A LIAR. PERIOD.
     Then who other than you should apologise for the lie?  You wrote 'The average (you could have been amnestied only if you wrote 'average' as 'some very special gangster-like' though that still does not make sence) Korean Cirizen were willing to and ever-ready to wield UZI's (= to kill other people, why not!)' in public newsgroup.  
 Because we Koreans hate war or violence, we get angry when we were called or treated as 'willing to and ever ready to wield machine guns to kill other people in the inner cities'
 It is non of your business to forgive yourself considering ,so called, UNintention or ignorance something. It is not you but Korean themselves to consider your Unintentionality and Ignorance, if any. 
 Even in the law, not only in morale, anybody who unintentionally or unknowingly did a lie resulting an insult to others, s/he should be called as a semi-criminal.  
  Let me guess one thing if you allow me. You are not a scientist in your real life at all. As Mr. S. Kim pointed out you have  very swallow understanding in scientific methods. If you don't mind disclosing your identity in real profession, with your degree in science if possible, please let me know. If you do mind, forgive me for my rudeness. My guess is simply based on my personal experience thatreal scientists ususally quite humble for their methods that they don't say about 'scientific' something to ju





stify their personal opinion.
 In that  sense, I admire the attitude of Mr. S. Kim, while I become suspicious of your knowledge of scientific method.
  Oh you said about Nazi's position on Jews.  Please refer to Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' to understand how  Nazi's pretended to be scientific in condemning Jews. Because you generalize your personal subjective observations or measurements ( please let me know which scientific paper you are referring if any) to make a stereotype on Korean people in general in the name of scientific method, I see close similarity between your method and Nazi's. You see?

I have really much to say about Korean people if you were sincerely interested in that. But all I saw in your articles were far fron that.  You never asked a relevent question to answer. What you say many Koreans answered sinserely to your 'stupid' questions only proves Korean generosity and hospitallity to foreigners.
However, you pseudo-scientist, why didn't you take into account how much you were flamed than answered kindly?
I am sorry I do not belong to those kind Korean netters. 
However, you pseudo-scientist, why didn't you measure by your scientific method how much you were flamed?
If you admit your mistakes and carelessness in observing( watching TV, i mean), recalling old memory (changing other's arguement on signiture in net into an insulting sentence), and even posting dirty words in Newsgroup (most subscribers in s.c.k. saw your lips), what other things you should do except begging parden of Korean netters? Your previous apology, saying 'I apologyse if anyone hurt, it was UNintentional' sounds like a justification of your misdeed to me, though it were better than nothing. And be





 specific in your apology. Was that about your F*** articles? or Chinese questions and followings? I really can't grasp it.
 
					8. 21. 1992.

					Rokho Kim

					^||   S   -^-
					     -^-   O 
				        [ ]   ^]  -^-