From: hasan@cs.washington.edu (Shams Hasan)
Subject: Re: Disgusted! Why?
Summary: Agreement after all....... 
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 06:36:33 GMT

In article <1h5nshINNnus@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> khan@ces.cwru.edu (Mansoor Khan) writes:
>
>
>
>> All Readers-
>>  After reading  about 100 or so SCP articles I came to the conclusion that 
>>  we should rename this group to names mentioned below:
>
>>  (*) Soc.filled.with.religious.bukwaas
>>  (*) soc.hindu.mulsim.fight
>>  (*) soc.*F*word.experts.
>>  (*) soc.muslim.maybe.maybeNot
>>  (*) soc.confused.
>>  (*) soc.SCI.attack.
>>  (*) soc.visa.F.J.B
>>  (*) soc.NoMutt.NoEnthu.         (figure this one out on your own!
>>                                   it is NOT dirty as some of you might think)
>
>>  I can keep going on and on.....
>>  This group is filled with this kinda of crapp and ridiculous articles. Why 
>>  cant't we write about Pakistan and NOT (Mulims/Hindu's, Ahmedi's, Cows,.....)
>       
>>  G R O W  U P
>
>
>> Amjad Qureshi
> 
>	Array, amjadee, jan-e-mon, itnaa ghussaa. ghussa thook doe.
>yeh network azaad hae. I guess this is the only thing which has any thing
>to do with Pakistan and is still azad. Oss din say derro jaani, jis din
>Pakistan may computers iss network say hook up ho gae. Haraami polticians,
>zaalim fauj kay nikamay generals, khufyaa police kay kaarinday, sub iss
>b.board say kaan/aankh legaa-ae ho'n gay.  Idhar toom nay kuch'h kehaa
>aur oodhar in rishvat-khore politicians, generals, aur oon-kay-chamchay
>toomhari aisee-taisee ker dai'n gay.
>	In the name of freedom of speech/expression, I request all Pakistanis
>and non Pakistanis to put whatever they feel like.
>if I want to call Navaz Sharif(LVQ)  and Benazir(LVQ)  chores
>and Daacoos of the nation I should be allowed to. Thanks god Pakistan is
>not connected to the Network.
>
>P.S.   LVQ = La'hole Vallaa Quwat for the shiyaateen-e-kabeers like
>             Navaz Nosharif and Bezamir.
>
>Mansoor
>
>
 
My dear Mansoor Khan,

Much as I dislike religious pundits, and non-pakistani topics on SCP,
you pose an argument, that wins the day......

However, freedom of anything does also come with some form of civilization
and responsibilities. In case you have not noticed in your stay in U.S,
you are going to face some difficulty if you decided to remove all your
clothing in class, because you feel it is the way to express your warm feelings
towards the blonde in the class....

Likewise, posting of articles on a valuable resource, which btw is being paid
by U.S taxpayers's dollars on an academic internet, whose posters not only
have no intention of posting pakistani articles, but who persist in detering
potential posters who may want to post articles but donot want to get involved
in "sh*t hitting the fan", every time they want to do something constructive as
regards to Pakistani issues and problems.

In any case, if that may be the price for keeping soc.culture.pakistan censor
free and open to all, than I think it is the better of the two evils. ie,
between the Shaitaan-e-Kabeer (Nawaz, Benazir, and likes), and the Shaitaan-e
-sageer ie. likes of Deepak (kisses) Bose, and other self imposed mullahs,
than I must go for the little devils !

Best Regards to all Shaitoons & Rakshases regardless of their sizes,
Shams Hasan.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan