HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ac717@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jeffry L. Johnson)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: aspect ratios
Date: 28 Dec 1992 07:01:31 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: ac717@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jeffry L. Johnson)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, randle@nosc.mil (Mike Randle) says:

>In article <1992Dec21.2021.1857@channel1> "eric walker" 
<eric.walker@channel1.com> writes:
>>Not sure about the first one, but I remember reading that Francis Ford
>>Coppola deliberately filmed the first two GODFATHER movies in the old
>>Academy aspect ratio of 1.33:1.  
>>
>>A couple of people I know have disagreed with me on this, so I'm not
>>sure if this is true or not.
>>
>During TNT's recent letterbox Sunday, Coppola was interviewed about
>letterboxing.  He stated that he always shot his films at Academy
>ratio so that they would not be butchered on TV.  I got the impression
>that if letterboxing were the norm, he would shoot films widescreen.

I'm not sure about the _Godfather_ films, but the 70mm prints of
_One From The Heart_ have an aspect ratio of 1.37, the Academy ratio.
The 70mm prints of the recent reissue of _Fantasia_ are also 1.37.

-- 
Jeffry L. Johnson                                    CWRU Film Society Alumnus
Technologist, HLA Lab, Institute of Pathology, CWRU/Univ. Hosp. of Cleveland
Projectionist, Centrum Theatre;      IATSE Local 160  Officer: Examining Board
Freenet: ac717 (Internet: ac717@cleveland.freenet.edu)   CompuServe: 71117,527
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: monitn@rebecca.its.rpi.edu (Nicholas Monitto)
Subject: Re: Noises Off, on VHS or LD?
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 05:26:52 GMT

Rob_Rosenhouse@hq-bbs.wisdom.bubble.org (Rob Rosenhouse) writes:

>In a message dated Sun  3 Jan 93 15:00, Fag2@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (farul 
>wrote:


> F> Was Noises Off ever released on VHS or LD? 

> F>      -- farul ghazali.
> F>         columbia university in the city of new york.
> 
>Noises off was released about 2 weeks ago on VHS.  Not sure about LD.
> 
>Rob

"Noises Off" was released on LD some time ago (could've been the same as the
VHS tape). I saw a disc in a movie store in CT on New Year's Eve.

Nick
monitn@rpi.edu

>-- Via DLG Pro v0.995

>If responding by EMAIL, please use the address below:
> 
>Rob_Rosenhouse@hq-bbs.wisdom.bubble.org
>Headquarters BBS 1-201-672-8944
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: rjn@FC.HP.COM (Bob Niland)
Subject: Re: Empire of the Sun 
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:01:36 GMT
Reply-To: rjn@FC.HP.COM
Organization: Hewlett-Packard/WSY Ft.Collins,CO,USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.8 PL6]

Gihan Karunaratne (gihan@bmerh886.BNR.CA) wrote:

> As I understand there is a CLV and a CAV version of EotS.  Can someone
> tell me if there is any supplementary material on the CAV version?  Is it
> worth paying extra for this CAV version (and supplements)?  Any comments
> on the quality of the transfers?

Get the CLV edition (WB 11753).  The CAV (11844) is seriously compromised.

Both editions are from the same 1988 video master.  The film (shot hard
matte at 1.66:1) is presented slightly letterboxed at 1.5:1, in digital
surround.  Both editions, unfortunately, have the idiotic Pioneer zooming
logos at the side changes.

The CLV is a PVI pressing, 3+1 sides, and includes the 50-minute making-of
short "China Odyssey".

The CAV is of 3M manufacture, but it goes downhill from there.  The white
flags were improperly set on every video frame (instead of 3/2 fields), so 2
of every 5 CAV still frames have field motion.  The making-of supplement is
NOT included.  You also get two additional side changes (and silly logos).
The package is a single sleeve with a flap at the top an is nearly
unmanageable.

I originally owned the CAV edition, modified the jacket, and even bought a
$20 imported copy of "China Odyssey" to complete it, but ended up giving it
away when a used CLV edition turned up.

Regards,                                              Hewlett-Packard
Bob Niland      Internet: rjn@FC.HP.COM               3404 East Harmony Road
                CompuServe:  71044,2124               Ft Collins CO 80525-9599

This article represents only the opinion[s] of its author, and is not an
official or unofficial position of, or statement by, the Hewlett-Packard
Company.  The text is provided for informational purposes only.  It is
supplied without warranty of any kind.
From: rjn@FC.HP.COM (Bob Niland)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Opinions on the MC RCA/Columbia letterboxed LAWRENCE OF ARABIA?
Date: 21 Dec 92 15:59:08 GMT
Reply-To: rjn@FC.HP.COM
Distribution: na
Organization: Hewlett-Packard/WSY Ft.Collins,CO,USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.8 PL6]

Steve Rehrauer (rehrauer@apollo.hp.com) wrote:

> As I was browsing in Sight & Sound the other day, I came across the
> letterboxed edition of LoA from RCA/Columbia.  Any opinions as to whether
> the transfer measures up to the Criterion's?  Is the CLV Criterion worth
> the extra $$?

I presume that "LoA" is "Lawrence of Arabia".  The RCA w/s LOA was made from
the same video and audio masters that Criterion used, so the RCA LD doesn't
have the usual RCA/Columbia annoyances.  However, I have heard that the RCA
LD has no chapter marks and may not have the same side breaks.  I have the
Criterion CLV edition (which is also of 3M manufacture - I don't know about 
the RCA, but it is likely PVI).

Regards,                                              Hewlett-Packard
Bob Niland      Internet: rjn@FC.HP.COM               3404 East Harmony Road
                CompuServe:  71044,2124               Ft Collins CO 80525-9599

This article represents only the opinion[s] of its author, and is not an
official or unofficial position of, or statement by, the Hewlett-Packard
Company.  The text is provided for informational purposes only.  It is
supplied without warranty of any kind.
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: paul@pubnet.com (Paul Telles)
Subject: Re: Mini Disc Review
Organization: PUBNET Communications Services
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 06:29:26 GMT
Followup-To: rec.video.releases
Summary: Looks like RHPS was shot in 1.66:1

In article <5407@calmasd.Prime.COM> jpb@calmasd.Prime.COM (Jan Bielawski) writes:
>In article <1992Dec29.185732.8310@pubnet.com> paul@pubnet.com (Paul Telles) writes:
><I picked up a few LDs recently and thought I would share my observations
><with the net...
><
><The Rocky Horror Picture Show, R, Stereo, 1992, FoxVideo, Released Dec. 23
><
><Excellent video transfer.  The disc is not LBX.  Not that it matters, I
><believe it was originally shot at academy ratio...can someone clarify
><this?  The digital audio is of the same quality as the CD soundtrack.
>
>	I believe it was shot at 1.66:1 and it needs letterboxing (there
>are those who believe letterboxing a 1.66:1 film is an illusion and the
>resulting improvement is a figment of imagination.  If this is so, try
>renting Ridley Scott's "The Duellists" and see how wide the black bands
>are even at 1.66:1.  Yes I did watch the movie several times yesterday.)

I tend to agree, for the most part letterboxing a film shot in a 1.66:1
aspect ratio  is an illusion.  I don't have the duellists, but I have
the Grateful Dead Movie on LD and it's in a 1.66:1 aspect ratio.  The black
bands are quite thin...nevertheless, I'm still a fan of widescreen/letterbox.

I think your exactly right...the credits at the end of chapter 19 on the
RHPS LD *are* letterboxed *just* like a film that is shot in 1.66:1.  It's
too bad that they didn't letterbox the entire disk...argh...

>	1. The movie was made in 1975 and the Academy ratio was considered
>passe at that time.
>
>	2. Compare the full screen shots in chapter 20 to the video frames
>on side 1.  You'll see arms cut off and such.
>
><The disc sounds like it is surround encoded, however, no credit is given
><to Dolby Labs and the Dolby logo does not appear on the sleeve.  It is
><interesting to note though, a surround test immediately follows the film.
><Can they encode in surround and not give credit to Dolby?
>
>	Hmmm.  Sounds interesting.  I'll try to check it on a surround
>set up -- anybody else tried it?
>
>	Jan Bielawski
>	Computervision, San Diego
>	jpb@calmasd.prime.com
>

Let us know what you find.  It sure seems like surround to me.

			--Paul
-- 
Paul Telles, PUBNET, Honolulu, HI - paul@pubnet.com - 0004002682@mcimail.com
"UNIX is a simple, coherent system that pushes a few good ideas and models to
the limit." D. Ritchie, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 27, No. 8, August 1984
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: paul@pubnet.com (Paul Telles)
Subject: Re: Mini Disc Review
Organization: PUBNET Communications Services
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 06:52:36 GMT
Followup-To: /dev/null
Summary: Is this alt.grammer.correction?

In article <C04Krn.E6I@hpuerca.atl.hp.com> htm@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Hal McMillan) writes:
>In <1992Dec29.185732.8310@pubnet.com> paul@pubnet.com (Paul Telles) writes:
>
>>Madonna: Live in Japan, NR, Stereo, Dolby Surround, 1987, Warner Music Japan
>
>>If your a Madonna fan, this disc is a must own.  It's a
>>live performance in Japan from her Who's That Girl tour.
>
>I would assume that this is the same world tour from which "Ciao, Italia"
>was produced.  Ciao is also an excellent performance by Madonna. On my
>laser, though, there seem to be portions where the audio is out of synch
>with the video, especially near the end. Can others confirm this? Is it
>the same on VHS?  BTW, it's "you're", not "your".
>-- 
>Hal McMillan   | Hewlett-Packard North American Response Center
>htm@atl.hp.com | 2000 South Park Place
>CIS 72627,642  | Atlanta, Georgia 30339

Gee, thanks Hal.  You're so much help.  BTW, it's "sync", not "synch"....

				--Paul
-- 
Paul Telles, PUBNET, Honolulu, HI - paul@pubnet.com - 0004002682@mcimail.com
"UNIX is a simple, coherent system that pushes a few good ideas and models to
the limit." D. Ritchie, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 27, No. 8, August 1984
From: rfischer@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Russell Fischer)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (import LD) - comments anyone?
Keywords: Laser disc, Twin Peaks, David Lynch
Date: 21 Dec 92 20:45:31 GMT
Organization: Brandeis University

jaime@tcville.HAC.COM (Jaime Villacorte) writes:


>	When I was at Ken Crane's over the weekend, I was surprised to
>see a few copies of David Lynch's _Twin_Peaks:_Fire_Walk_With_Me_
>sitting in their Japanese laser disc import bin (for around $60 if I
>remembered correctly)

>	Has anyone who has viewed this care to comment on it? Preferably
>in the areas of audio and video quality, whether it was widescreen, if
>it was subtitled, and if it had extra material. Does anyone know the
>US domestic release date for this movie?

>							- jaime villacorte


i don't know about the laser release, but FWWM is supposed to be out
on video in the states on the 6th of january, so i would look for the
laser slightly after that...

i don't know anything about the japanese transfer to laser.
i wouldn't be suprised if it has extra material...supposedly it
appeared in a longer version last spring at cannes and was ill
received, therefore meriting cuts (ahem.) don't know how much was cut
though...

russ fischer
From: hm78907@cs.tut.fi (Hannu Mikkola)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Opinions wanted from couple of LD's
Date: 31 Dec 92 18:11:27
Organization: Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland.
Distribution: rec
NNTP-Posting-Host: kaarne.cs.tut.fi
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed below are writers own.
Peruutus: Mielipiteet ovat omiani.

It's again time to improve my LD selection.
I'd like to hear some comments of the following discs and versions
available currently (or in the known near future), specifically if
LBX version is available.

One flew over the cuckoo's nest
Amadeus
Naked Lunch
Kafka

Alien 3         I've read some complaints about the graininess of the
                transfer and it being the fault of some certain LD
                player models; what's the true story?

Citizen Kane    Recommendations please; which version has the best
                combination of good transfer, affordable price and
                interesting supplementary material?

Robocop         LVF lists this as a "new release to be expected in '92"
                from Image, is there a better (LBX?) version coming or
                already out?

Finally, any news about possible LD releases of Videodrome (by Cronenberg)
or The Trial (by Welles)? Are either of them available in Japan?


- hannu
---
Hannu Mikkola
hm78907@cs.tut.fi
Tampere University of Technology, Finland

--
There is no doubt that certain witches can do marvellous things with
regard to male organs, for this agrees with what has been seen and
heard by many, and with the general account of what has been known
concerning that member through the senses of sight and touch.
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: mm@brl.mil (Mike Markowski)
Subject: Hard Day's Night/Help! Supplements
Reply-To: mm@brl.mil
Organization: US Army Research Laboratory
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 18:39:10 GMT

Could someone with these Criterion CAV lds please comment on the
supplementary material.  Is it worth paying so much more than the
CLV versions?  I'd rather use the money saved for other discs if
not.  Thanks!
-- 
Mike Markowski
mm@brl.mil
(410)278-6674
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: mckelvey@fafnir.com (James W. McKelvey)
Subject: Re: The Prisoner
Reply-To: mckelvey@fafnir.com
Organization: Fafnir Software, Saugus, CA, USA
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 18:38:07 GMT

In article <1992Dec21.080927.22067@uhura.neoucom.edu> wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu  
(William R. Cruce) writes:
> In article <20836@acorn.co.uk> asmith@acorn.co.uk (Andy Smith) writes:
> >
> >Does anyone know how many episodes there were in total of the prisoner?
> 
>                                17
> 
> 
> -- 
> 	The answer is never simple and is always changing.
>     William L.R. (Bill) Cruce       INTERNET: wlrc@uhura.neoucom.edu 

Yes, but there is an alternate version of episode two available (on videotape  
at least).
-- 
A man should not strive to eliminate his complexes, but to get in
accord with them; they are legitimately what directs his conduct
in the world. - Sigmund Freud
Jim McKelvey                      mckelvey@fafnir.com
From: nicolas@stam.nl (Nico Veenkamp)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Leonard Maltin is immortal
Date: 21 Dec 92 08:39:34 GMT
Organization: Stam Tijdschriften bv, Rijswijk, The Netherlands

kimp@rpi.edu (Phil Kim) writes:

> I am puzzled.  Leonard Maltin is 42 years old today.  He reviewed 
> over 19,000 films in his _Movie_and_Video_Guide_1993_.  That means he 
> watches about 450 films per year!  I know it's possible, but that's 
> sick.

naahhh, just dedicated :-)

I seem to remember that he has a whole group of co-workers viewing and 
rating movies together with him so he can have some time to sleep. I must 
say that of all the movie guides I own, Maltin's the one that I will 
consult first and then maybe some of the others. Also because at least 
two of my other guides acknowledge Maltin's as one of there sources.


      *================================================================*
      |  Nico Veenkamp	        | You write, we publish                |
      |  Stam Tijdschriften bv  | -------------------------------------|
      |  P.O. Box 235           | Internet : nicolas@stam.nl           |
      |  2280 AE  Rijswijk      | FidoNet  : 2:281/1.7                 |
      |  The Netherlands        | BIX      : nicolas                   |
      *================================================================*
From: idathon@uts.uni-c.dk (Hans O. Nymand)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Aspect Ratio for 7 popular films (Laserdiscs)
Date: 21 Dec 92 21:59:58 GMT
Organization: UNI-C, Danish Computing Centre for Research and Education

In <ypq2gdl@rpi.edu> kimp@rpi.edu (Phil Kim) writes:

>Here are aspect ratios of 7 popular films (measured from laserdiscs 
>on my projection TV):

>Most films made prior to 1953 were shoot at 1.33:1, or an Academy 
>Ratio.

>1. Ben-Hur			2.63:1

That's a pretty extreme letterbox. How does this look in real life?

>2. Star Wars			2.44:1

Hmm, that's wider than it was shot (2.35:1).

You say your TV is a ratio 1.375:1. I thought TV's generally was 1.33:1.


Henrik Sahlholt
(d01hs@vm2.uni-c.dk)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Laser Wonderland in Japan
From: mmiller@netlink.cts.com (Michael Miller)
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 21:18:27 PST
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA

Are there any mail order houses in Japan that sell Laserdiscs to the US?
If so, I'd sure like their address/fax #.
Thanks,

--                    
INTERNET:  mmiller@netlink.cts.com (Michael Miller)
UUCP:   ...!ryptyde!netlink!mmiller
NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115
From: jonke@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov (Stephen Jonke)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: LD Player Questions
Date: 21 Dec 92 18:26:15 GMT
Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A75B766F2F015C5D@joe.gsfc.nasa.gov>
X-Xxdate: Mon, 21 Dec 92 18:26:07 GMT
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12

In article <18692@mindlink.bc.ca> Mike Quigley, Mike_Quigley@mindlink.bc.ca
writes:
>First off, does anyone know anything about the Kenwood LD player LVD-320? I'd
>like to know who makes it. The store selling it locally for about $500 says
>it's not made by Pioneer. A friend said it was Sony, but another store (a
>competitor) thinks it is made by Samsung.

Sony laser disc players are made by Sony -- they are the only other company
that makes their own laser disc players from bottom up (all others use the
video from a pioneer player and change the audio part to their own.)  If you
plan to get a new Sony, look for the MDP-455 which replaces the MPD-333 -- all
the stores I've looked in still only have the old model, though.  Apparently
it is available via mail order, though.

>
>Second, if I buy the cheap Pioneer player, which doesn't have numbers on the
>remote control to do things like chapter, tracks, etc., and I get a remote
>from a higher up model of the same year's vintage which DOES have these
>numbers, will the numbers register if I use this second remote? What about
>other features like pause in CAV, slow motion, etc.?

I can't say with certainty about this specific feature, but when I was looking
a laser disc players I asked a salesperson about this and they took the remote
from a Pioneer player that had one of those knob type forward/reverse controls
and tested to see if it would work with the low end player that did not have
one on the remote.  It did, in fact, work.  So did some other things we tried.
 The numeric keypad should almost certainly work, but test it out -- go to a
store that sells several Pioneer models and try it.

Steve
------------------------
jonke@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov
------------------------
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Patriot Games
Date: 23 Dec 92 18:52:02 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout

In article <22DEC199223003412@loyola.edu> mglicksman@loyola.edu (Michael `SLAM' Glicksman) writes:
<
<	Has a wide-screen version of Patriot Games been released on LaserDisc
<in the U.S.? I've had no luck finding it around Baltimore.

Yep.
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
From: david@agora.rain.com (David Robinson)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: The Little Mermaid (CLV) import
Date: 4 Jan 93 05:03:10 GMT
Article-I.D.: agora.C0BCpB.n4F
Organization: Open Communications Forum


Hmmmm.  I'm not sure that this is the best place to post this, but...


I just ran across a laser disc that I hadn't seen before:  The Little Mermaid
in a Japanese pressing.  It's CLV and "multi-lingual" (no sub-titles...the
digital soundtrack is the original English, while the analog(ue) tracks
are in Japanese).  The quality of the transfer is quite fine.

I picked up the next-to-the-last copy for myself, then put a "hold" on the
last one, just in case anyone on the net is interested.  The source is
one of the Portland Tower Record/Video outlets (Gateway...102nd and
N.E. Halsey, for the locals!).  They told me that they had made a "special
buy" directly from Japan; 15 copies of "The Little Mermaid" (oops, add
quotes above, too), and 15 copies of "Cinderella." 

They sold out in two days (no copies of "Cinderella" left...I got mine,
and the other two are now gone...sorry!).

If anyone is interested in this LD, send me email immediately.  I can
only hold it a few days without a commitment to purchase it.

I don't know if Tower is going to bring any more Japanese imports in,
but one would certainly hope so.

And given the feeding frenzy over these two...and the high quality of
the discs...the Tower folks admitted to being "impressed."

Progress??

david

-- 
My opinions belong to me...and vice versa.  They're not copyrighted;
third party thinkers should feel free to clone them at will.              
david@agora.rain.com                        
david@3cpu.rain.com (just in case!) 
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
From: bverreau@netcom.com (stargazer)
Subject: LD's I'd like to see Criterion do [was: A Christmas Carol]
Summary: send me your wish list
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 02:32:48 GMT

In article <1992Dec20@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> (John Hofbauer) writes:

>> [description of poor quality "Christmas Carol" release]
>
> This is a film I too want to own on laserdisc, but only when a good
> pressing is available.

Several people have complained about the quality of this disc - which
strikes me as curious, since I recently rented a copy and though it was
quite acceptable.  I found the title in the new release bin and wonder
if it might be a different version.  Unfortunately, I didn't copy down
the catalog number.  I do recall it used the British release title of
'Scrooge' rather than 'Christmas Carol'.  Anyway, I rented with the
idea of previewing before buying - having seeing so many bad prints
on television. The transfer seemed visually clean without many holes
or scratches.  I'm not sure about the audio, my sound system is poor.

> I plan to write to Voyager/Criterion and suggest they give it the
> deluxe treatment.

The person you want to contact [according to my Criterion rep] is:

  Jon Mulvaney c/o Voyager
  1351 Pacific Coast Hwy.
  Santa Monica, CA 90401

I'm planning to send him a wish list with my favorite missing titles.
If anyone would like to have me add their selections, send an e-mail
reply.  Just to start it off, here are three of my requests:

"Top Hat" (1935)
"Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" (1939)
"Cat Ballou" (1965)

I suppose some films are just unavailable for distribution, but
perhaps other omissions are oversights.  Let me know if you have
other potential releases for Criterion.  Please e-mail to keep
down volume.  If there's enough interest, I'll post the results
to this newsgroup.

Bernie Verreau					bverreau@netcom.COM
Netcom - Online Communication Services 		Redwood City, CA
From: jaime@tcville.HAC.COM (Jaime Villacorte)
Newsgroups: rec.video.releases
Subject: Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (import LD) - comments anyone?
Keywords: Laser disc, Twin Peaks, David Lynch
Date: 21 Dec 92 17:21:34 GMT
Reply-To: jaime@tcville.HAC.COM (Jaime Villacorte)
Followup-To: rec.video.releases
Organization: Hughes Aircraft Co., El Segundo, CA


	When I was at Ken Crane's over the weekend, I was surprised to
see a few copies of David Lynch's _Twin_Peaks:_Fire_Walk_With_Me_
sitting in their Japanese laser disc import bin (for around $60 if I
remembered correctly)

	Has anyone who has viewed this care to comment on it? Preferably
in the areas of audio and video quality, whether it was widescreen, if
it was subtitled, and if it had extra material. Does anyone know the
US domestic release date for this movie?

							- jaime villacorte