HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bi_kin@uxmail.ust.hk (HoiFung JACK @>-`)
Subject: Internal Conference?! (Concerning the future of 3LHA)
Organization: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 17:00:02 GMT

**************Internal Conference of 3LHA***********************
Return-Path: <bi_kin>
Received: from ustsu2.ust.hk by uxmail.ust.hk (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA03323; Mon, 12 Oct 92 00:54:52 HKT
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 00:54:52 HKT
From: bi_kin (HoiFung JACK @>-`)
Message-Id: <9210111654.AA03323@uxmail.ust.hk>
To: bhchan@ocf.berkeley.edu, bi_kin@uxmail.ust.hk,
        mkwan@esk.compserv.utas.edu.au, shsieh@esk.compserv.utas.edu.au,
        stu_wclau@vax1.acs.jmu.edu
Subject: Compromise?!
Cc: bi_kin
Status: R


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
		Three Lonely Hearts Arcade  @>-`-,-
#############################################################################
First of all, let me introduce myself to all you, my name is Ugly Dog.  
Everyone can call me Dr. Dog (or Lonely Dog or Wandering Dog) here HKUST.
____________________________________________________________________________

As an originator of "Three Lonely Hearts Arcade" ( 3LHA ),
I, Dr.Dog, feel there is a need to make a compromise here.
There is already one Dr. Billy called himself being one of these 3LHs:

>----------------------------------------------------------------
>Billy H. Chan 	<bhchan@ocf.berkeley.edu>   "Life: a strange new
>Just Babbling   <bhchan@soda.berkeley.edu>   state of confusion"
>Disclaimer 1:   I'm actually a really nice person. (sorta) :) ;)

And meanwhile, 3 of you formed a so-called "new 3LHC" secretly, any
suggestions?  Need voting or public opinion?

There are 5 Drs here up to now:
1.	Dr. Dog
	bi_kin@uxmail.ust.hk
	(A year 2 undergrad in HKUST eating dog's food everyday and
	ejecting smelly dog's dung once a MONTH!!!)
2.	Dr. Billy
	bhchan@ocf.berkeley.edu
3.	Dr. Feelgood
	std_wclau@vax1.acs.jmu.edu
4.	Dr. Mike
	mkwan@esk.compserv.utas.edu.au
5.	Dr. Sleeping Beauty
	shsieh@esk.compserv.utas.edu.au

Remarks:  In my case, there is a time lag after what u post in the newsgroup 
from one corner of the world, say, one or two days, to the other 
corner, so...very difficult to compromise, any constructive suggestions?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dr. Dog's last comment:
No "NO WAY", "TRY TO SEE"!
           __
          /  \
         / ..|\		No Matter you are white dog or black dog,
        (_\  |_)
        /  \@'			Those in this Arcade are VERY DOG!!! 
       /     \
  _   /  `   |				--- Dr. Dog 
  \\/  \  | _\				        	@>-`-,
   \   /_ || \\_
    \____)|_) \_)
  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 
  * *  DR. DOG                                HoiFung JACK -'<@   * *
  * *                               Email:  bi_kin@uxmail.ust.hk  * *
  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: dluk@mprgate.mpr.ca (David Luk)
Subject: Testing(EMPTY!!!)
Reply-To: dluk@mprgate.mpr.ca (David Luk)
Organization: MPR Teltech Ltd.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 18:43:16 GMT
From: haiqiu@ducvax.auburn.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: An open letter to the US employers
Date: 13 Oct 92 20:38:56 GMT
Organization: Auburn University, AL

In article <1992Oct13.122506.27993@cs.umb.edu>, tchow@ra.cs.umb.edu (Tony Yee Chow) writes:
> I find this article in misc.jobs.offered (article 23571) and I am very upset.
> I THOUGHT there is no racist in this country.
> What do the other chinese people think about this guy?
> 
> 
> In article <2AD62C37.13647@news.service.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Mr Shannon Yeh) writes:
>>Dear Employers in the US:
>>
>>Some thousands of Chinese nationals finally got their free grenn cards (i.e.
>>refugee) after they successfully sold their home country, China.  Those 
>>refugees are of no morality, and simply are liers: they declared that they 
>>faced danger to return to China, and I believe that everyone knows how 
>>dangerous to travel back and forth between here and China these days.

  No body has sold China yet. -:)
  Danger or safe are relative issues. It depends on your behavior. AIDS is
pretty safe down to the earth if you have a good conducted personal behavior.
But why people still bother to talk about AIDS and be so afraid of it? Going
back to China is also pretty safe. But the price is you must have a good
control of your mouth. Somebody can. But I SIMPLY CAN NOT TORELATE FROM
SAYING WHAT I WANT TO SAY. So it is still very dangerous for me to go home.
Sooner or later I will be in trouble caused by my mouth.
  If Prof. Fang LiZhi can control his mouth at least as good as a common
people do. He won't be more danger than others if he returns to China. But
the issue is he CAN NOT.

>>I urge your company NOT to offer any privilege to those refugees when they
>>compete your comany's open position with other non-refugee candidates.  Your
>>cooperation will recover the damage made by those refugees, George Bush and 
>>other US legislators.  Thank you.

  The employers know much better of the values of these so called "refugee"
to their business than you do. Don't bother to tell them who is to employed
and who is not, please.

>>Mr. Shannon T. Yeh
>>Irvine, California
>>
>>PS: I am not a student.  I just cannot tolerate the justice raped by those 
>>    Chinese students and the US legislators.

  Many of us do need protection. I would rather want this protection come from
my own country instead of a foreign country. However now it is a bite pill for
us to swallow that accept protection of this foreign country is our best
choice. It's a regretaful thing. However I don't think we need to feel shame
of it. It is the CG who should feel shame of it: It wasn't able to protect us
but rather have to let a foreign country to protect us.

--HAMLET
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: ystan@fawlty10.eng.monash.edu.au (Mr YS Tan)
Subject: Re: * * M U S I C * *
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 04:30:47 GMT

william@natimuk.acci.com.au (William Lo) writes:

>In article <1992Oct9.105037.20594@dcs.warwick.ac.uk> wing@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Mr. Raymond Chan) writes:
>>In article <1992Oct8.225149.2245@vax1.mankato.msus.edu> g25@vax1.mankato.msus.edu writes:
>>>
>>>See, what I'm trying to say is that jazz is not that "out of touch",
>>>it's friendly like pop music.

>	And as a matter of matter, it's pretty "out of reach"! Y'know,
>	being a classical boxhead myself I sometimes would want to listen	
>	to classicl jazz, and I would go buy a jazz CD snatching at a
>	good piece of music or two, but would eventually be finding nothing
>	interesting. Modern jazz stuff is often less jazzy and virtually
		     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>	in the "pop-n'-funk" direction... (not bad) But I often find jazz 
	^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>	stuff which is far from interesting. 

	You are probably not exposed to the right stuff. What have you been
in touch with ? Kenny G ? Dave Koz ? ... Those are more towards pop. 
It's kind of weired. Beginners (Jazz listeners) would take those as real 
Jazz, but for those that has been listening to Jazz for some time, those are 
considered more as "pop". For some real good stuff, I would suggest the 
Chesky label. Try David Chesky, Clark Terry, Luiz Bonfa ....


>	I still find classical and pop easier to listen to. 
>	
>---Cheers,
>	Bill
><>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>
><> Baby Elvis                  ) "I don't know anything     <>
><> William W. Lo              (   about music. In my line   <> 
><> william@natimuk.acci.com.au )  you don't have to."       <>
><>^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v(                             <>
><> Welcome to William's World! )         : Elvis Presley    <>
><>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>*O*<>

--
                    #
    |\___/|         #   Tan, Yi Shiau
    | . . |         #   Email : ystan@engds.eng.monash.edu.au
  ===: v :===       #           ystan@basil.eng.monash.edu.au
    `\-^-/'         #
   Jazz Cat !       #
From: yuk@hpopd.pwd.hp.com (Yuk Lun Chan)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 12:31:07 GMT
Subject: Re: Hospitals/medicine in HK
Organization: Hewlett-Packard ISG-SBU-PWD, UK.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong

>soc.culture.hongkong / <U58402@uicvm.uic.edu> /  8:19 pm  Oct 13, 1992 /
>Hi, all!


>I'm a medical student at the Univ. of Illinois at Chicago, and I'm trying
>to make my plans for my clinical training. One of my options is to do a
>clinical rotation in Hong Kong, but I have very little information on the
>practice of medicine out there. I've been to Hong Kong only twice in my
>life, both for only a couple of days, and only as a tourist. So here are
>my questions. I hope you can help me out.

The system in Hong Kong is a bit strange, all medical doctors from countries
other than commonwealth need to take an examination to practice in Hong Kong.
I don't know is it still true and what happen to US doctors. You better check
it out. And there were a number of medical students cannot find clinical
traning (or first job after traning). So be careful.

>1. What is the practice of medicine like in Hong Kong? Being a British
>colony, I would expect that the delivery of health care is along the
>lines of the British system. Are most people covered by private insurance,
>public/state insurance, or just not covered at all? Are there people
>that deliver health care outside of the traditional doctor/nurse/clinic/
>hospital system?
Half and half. There are a lot of government clinic, hospital but there are
more private clinic (no real nurse). Not many people covered by insurance,
but most people willing to pay.

>2. Are there health concerns specific to Hong Kong that would not be seen
>in any other Western urban setting? My guess is that Hong Kong would have
>a different spectrum of infectious or tropical disease that would not be
>common here in the US.
The different isn't too big. But cancer is the number one killer instead of
heart disease in Western countries.


>3. I don't speak Cantonese, and speak a little Mandarin. I don't read
>Chinese at all. Would this be a real problem for everyday living? If
>I go to Hong Kong, I expect to stay for about a month.
Everyday living, a bit. Working, a lot. Do you expect to care English speaking
people only? The best earning is from old people, most of them can't speak
English.

>4. This question may sound really stupid, but.... Are there rural areas
>of Hong Kong? And if so, are there local clinics, or do the people have to
>go into the city for health care? My impression of Hong kong is based
>solely on a few days' worth of sight seeing and from watching John Woo
>and Jackie Chan films.

I can say yes (only a few spots, can be reach by heli under 1/2 hour, you may
not define it as rural in US standard, but it is in HK). And no, there is a lot
of town or suburben area (they nearly all joined together). No body really 
need to go into city for health care.

Yuk
Xref: sparky soc.culture.hongkong:12610 soc.culture.china:27984 soc.culture.taiwan:14423
From: ericlaw@vax.muskingum.edu (Eric Law, Geology Department)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong,soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
Subject: Re: Weekly Love Story -- No. 1
Date: 15 Oct 92 14:15:47 -0600
Organization: Muskingum College

In article <1992Oct15.023944.20114@cam.compserv.utas.edu.au>, mkwan@esk.compserv.utas.edu.au (Michael C. KWAN) writes:
> 
> 	Let's call the guy #A, his girlfriend #B and #C the girl whom he
> did not start anything with but loves.  

	** #A and #B are in deep love or are married.
	   #B is satisfied (at least for that moment)
	   #A obvious is not or not quite or not as #B is.

	   This is one of the difference between a man and a woman.

	   As far as what would #A do to #C would have little meaning
	   to distinguish a man from a woman.



> 	I don't know whether to call #A a lucky man or unlucky man.  He is
> lucky because he has someone who obviously loves him, and he himself has
> grown to love.  Life should be fine and dandy, right?  Well, it seems that
> #A is suffering from a common male ailment, striving to be a "hero".  It
> doesn't mean brave in the strictest sense, but rather it means that #A is
> trying to do the "right" thing viewed by the secular society.  If he
> decided to develope the relationship with #C, then the world around him
> would point fingers at him as a guilty criminal.  Well, in this case, I
> would have to admit that I feel #A should have given more thought to
> himself, rather than thinking how other people will respond.
> 	That's why I say #A is also unlucky.  In any relationship there is
> responsibility.  I don't mean responsibility in terms of sticking to one
> partner, but responsible in terms of making the whole relationship a happy
> one for both the guy and gal.  #B is obviously happy(well, not if she
> knows about #C!!!), but #A definitely isn't.  Why?  Because of a false
> sense of doing the right thing.  Actually in the present situation, two
> people are suffering, but if #A had done otherwise, less people might feel
> miserable.  
> 	So, here it is #A, next time, do what you want(within reasonable
> limits:  don't kill and plunder, etc.), what makes you happy?  Think about it.
> 
> 			Deep thoughts,
> 			 DR. LEMON from Canada
>                          International Lonely Hearts Club
> 
> 
>
From: abs0@coos.dartmouth.edu (Kelvin Leung)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: ooOO dOG AND GOd OOoo
Keywords: dog god
Date: 13 Oct 92 19:05:15 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

bi_kin@uxmail.ust.hk (HoiFung JACK @>-`) writes:

>How about if a naughty Dog says:

>=>	The God has the power to create a mass which HE cannot lift up under
>  	any possible situations in the God's level 
>	(Remarks: say, at any time, in any places, 
>		in n-dimensions, for all n....)
>=>	The God cannot lift up a mass under any possible situations 

If he wanted to, he can create an equivalent mass somewhere in the opposite
end of his domain, and have them pulling each other... (Laws of gravitation,
my friend. ;) 

Folks, if we are going to talk about religion in schk, please confine it 
by talking about how religion relates to us, people of schk (or Hong Kong 
in general). 

Don't mean to be a net police--just don't want people to put these
discussion into their kill files.

Thanks.

Yours Sincerely,
Kelvin Leung
e-mail: abs0@coos.dartmouth.edu
 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: rchoy@clarify.com (Raymond Choy)
Subject: Re: Acts of love
Organization: Clarify, San Jose
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 17:57:54 GMT

In article <9228716.27498@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> william@natimuk.acci.com.au (William Lo) writes:
>In article <1992Oct13.012202.27390@cc.uow.edu.au> tcheung@cc.uow.edu.au (teresa cheung) writes:
>>
>>This sounds like waiting in line in a department store
>>to buy some goods for sale.  Have you guys never experience

Yes, it's exactly like this. You want to buy something but you
cannot afford it. You then wait for the goods to be on sale (when
will the goods be on sale anyway :-)), wait in line and the goods
may be sold out before you get the chance. 

>>a relationship where there is mutual attraction, mutual love
>>and mutual friendship.  When you have found it, trust me, there
>>is NO STRUGGLE to win that girl or guy.  Because, that LOVE
>>is natural for both of you!
>>
>
>	That sounds complicated:
>
>	Mutual(attraction + love + friendship) = no struggle needed
>
>---Hmhmhm,
>	Bill

But the reality is:

Mutual(attraction + love + friendship) = no struggle needed + <uncertainty factor>
where <uncertainty factor> = Luck and Fate

But what is Luck and Fate??

It's just too complicated ... Maybe we need Steven Leung to do another
mathematical research on this again :-).


-Raymond Choy-




Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: manyuen@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu ()
Subject: test
Organization: University of Hawaii
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 21:09:48 GMT

     Just to say hi.....
From: ylnwai@cayley.uwaterloo.ca (Newton Wai)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: ooOO dOG AND GOd OOoo
Keywords: dog god
Date: 12 Oct 92 00:42:55 GMT
Organization: University of Waterloo

In article <1992Oct11.130813.2035@uxmail.ust.hk>, bi_kin@uxmail.ust.hk (HoiFung JACK @>-`) writes:
> 			IS THE GOD ALMIGHTY?
> 			^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 	** DOG'S THEOREM:  	The God is not all-powerful **
> 
> Proof:
> 	Assume the God is all-powerful.
> 	Thus, the God has the power to do anything
> 	=> the God has the power to create a mass which HE cannot lift
> 	   up
> 	=> the God cannot lift up a mass
> 	=> the God is not all-powerful
> 
> 		!!!!CONTRADICTION!!!!
> 
> 	=> Completed the proof of DOG'S THEOREM by contrapositivity.
> 
>     @@@@  WELCOME ANY DOGS PLACING DOG'S COMMENTS ON DOG'S THEORM  @@@@

	OK, First, I'm not a dog. (I am a Cow)

	Second, the above is a very classicial argument. But my question is :
	If God can/cannot create a mass that he can't lift up, what effect does
it have on my dayily living? IMHO, the above is just a game of words.
	BTW, for those of you who are interested, I think there  are many books
out there discussing both sides of the above argument.
> 
> 
>          ****   Next Attraction:	Is Dog the God?  :)   ****
> 
> 						ooOO dOG AND GOd OOoo
> 
>   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 
>   * *  DR. DOG                                HoiFung JACK -'<@   * *
>   * *                               Email:  bi_kin@uxmail.ust.hk  * *
>   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

P.S. : Dr. Dog, it's a pleasure fingering you.

								Newton Wai
From: yeun0001@student.tc.umn.edu (Henry Yeung)
Subject: Sing Tao's phone #
Organization: University of Minnesota
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 22:52:36 GMT

Does anybody has the phone number of the Sing Tao Limited
in Chicago? If so, could somebody post it in schk? Thanks.


-- 
/Henry
--------------------Henry Yeung (KB0HWV)---------------------
---------------(yeun0001@student.tc.umn.edu)-----------------
-----------University-of-Minnesota-at-Twin-Cities------------
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: tyvng@cs.sfu.ca (Vincent Ng)
Subject: Technical Reports
Keywords: Computers, Reports, Hong Kong
Organization: CSS, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 20:19:22 GMT

I would be very interest  in knowning what kinds of computing researches are
happening in universities in Hong Kong. Is there any kind soul here
have the list of technical reports that the universities have ? Or
even better, a ftp site to obtain them ?

-thanks
Vincent Ng
School of Computer Science
Simon Fraser University
Canada
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: alaw@uucp (Alvin W. Law)
Subject: Re: Wanted:Comments on New CD
Organization: Oracle World HQ, Redwood Shores, California
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 17:32:58 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
              at Oracle Corporation.  The opinions expressed are those
              of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.

dteng@cmcvx1.claremont.edu writes:
>Hello,
>	Could someone please tell me how the new Sandy Lam's album sounds and
>what about Hacken Lee's new one? Thanx
>						BusterR

Sandy's new album, 'Come Back to Love', is quite good.  It's about even
with the early City Rhythm series, but not as good as "Dreamt, Crazy,
Tired" and "Wild Flower".  It does not have the kind of integrity as
compared to her last two albums.

BTW, it's her first album since she left WEA.
-- 
 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 	Alvin W. Law				Email :	alaw@oracle.com
 	Manufacturing Applications		        !uunet!oracle!alaw
	Oracle Corporation			Voice : (415) 506-3390
From: mkwan@esk.compserv.utas.edu.au (Dr. Mike)
Subject: Re: Help! 3 lonely heart Dr(s)
Organization: University of Tasmania at Launceston
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 92 04:09:49 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.160943.13450@dsg.tandem.com>, leung@DSG.Tandem.COM (Steven Leung) writes:
>
>cfs2b@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Chun Fai Szeto) writes:
>> 	To all known to be Dr. in 3 lonely heart club, I need your 
>> analysis on the case regarding to one of my best friend:
>
>Seems to me what your friend (and a lot of other like souls) need
>is not these Drs in the 2LHC, (remember, they are boys and might
>have the same problems themselves, sorry Drs.) but a XX FuYan mailbox.
>Any ladies voluteered?
>
>Steven
>------
>328. Seek opportunity, not security. ...
>        - Life's Little Instruction Book by H. J. Brown, Jr.
>

	Hi Steven, one of our host is a lady (Dr. Sleeping Beauty).


						New 3 Lonely Hearts Club

Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: tcheung@cc.uow.edu.au (teresa cheung)
Subject: Re: New Topic: Chinese Christians
Organization: University Of Wollongong
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 07:37:06 GMT

eln235s@lindblat.cc.monash.edu.au (Mr H Hui) writes:

>teresa cheung (tcheung@cc.uow.edu.au) wrote:
>: Does anyone want to comment on why some
>: Hong Kong students when they study overseas
>: become Christians and join "Chinese Christian
>: Fellowships"
>: 
>: Comments?
>At least 2 reasons :
>1. Such religious groups are fast track to get contact with people when
>   being alone overseas.
>2. Alone sometime => lonely and bored.

Yes, two very common reasons.  But if you one is not Christian, 
how can they stand the stuff that they are talking about 
(some of the topics are so unrealistic, how can one pretend to swallow it.)  
Secondly, don't the people suspect that you are there only to meet people.  
Or do you meet people who are only semi-serious about Christianity and 
are there to meet people too.

>------------------------------------------------------------------
>Humphrey Hui                      :  Have you taken a risk lately?
>HHUI@basil.eng.monash.edu.au      :  Life is boring without risk!
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: ericlaw@vax.muskingum.edu (Eric Law, Geology Department)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong,soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
Subject: Re: Weekly Love Story -- No. 1
Date: 16 Oct 92 06:15:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: vax.1992Oct16.121515.3852
Organization: Muskingum College

In article <1992Oct15.203746.14534@m.cs.uiuc.edu>, yang@dante.cs.uiuc.edu (Der-Shung Yang) writes:
> 
>>	** #A and #B are in deep love or are married.
>>	   #B is satisfied (at least for that moment)
>>	   #A obvious is not or not quite or not as #B is.
> 
>>	   This is one of the difference between a man and a woman.
> 
> Do you mean that a man is usually not as satisfied with a marriage as 
> a woman is?  That sounds quite an outdated idea (even in modern Chinese
> societies, not mention the Western societies).  

	** Yes.

	   I mean marriage is not as important to a man as that to a 
	   woman.

	   This should not be the fault of man. But this will tell
	   a man how to treat his woman.
From: tylee@austin.ibm.com (Ter-Yuan Lee)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: One Line A Day, Network Format Kara-OK
Date: 8 Oct 92 18:34:07 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: IBM
Originator: tylee@leety.austin.ibm.com


In article <7013@transfer.stratus.com>, cheung@strider.hw.stratus.com writes:
> I got this tread from another news group.  Do our brothers and sisters in SCHK
> want to continue this rhyme?  
> 
>  
> In article <4emvQNy00WCX041UVH@andrew.cmu.edu>, "Bartosz M. Blacha" <bb2q+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> 
> Pull a hair and you lose the babe!
This is not permitted by Abe!
-- 
/* The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of IBM's.         *\
 * Take care and have a nice day.                                            *
\* Ter-Yuan Lee                                                              */
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong