From: Mic.Oettinger@launchpad.unc.edu (Mic Oettinger)
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
Subject: Re: one lab
Date: 16 Nov 92 02:54:52 GMT
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service

In article <kmr4.222.721798047@po.CWRU.edu> kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan) writes:
>In article <1992Nov13.212112.1509@samba.oit.unc.edu> Mic.Oettinger@launchpad.unc.edu (Mic Oettinger) writes:
>>>Oh, you mean that one student, told you that these things were going on,
>>>e.g. by word of mouth, not that you've actually witnessed these 'experi-
>>>ments'.
>>
>>No that is not the case. I did not hear anything from this person. I just
>>happened to be talking to him today and he brought it up. This is all he
>>told me, and you can feel free to look the stuff up on your own. I am
>>still working on the original source of my information, and I hope to get
>>it to you all soon.
>
>	Let me get this straight: You were talking to this person, but you 
>didn't hear anything from him?


I am terribly sorry for not spelling each and every possible detail out
for your obviously unadvanced intuition. What I should have said was:
"My original claims did not originate from the person who told me about MIU.
I was just talking to him about OOB's and he mentioned that he knew of a
place, so I asked him not less than ten times if he was sure, to which he
finally became so irritated with me that he said, 'What is it with you
Americans? You are always so paranoid that you're being lied to.' So I
said, 'Ok, I will trust you on this one then.' I thought maybe you people
would be interested in knowing about it. Excuse me if I was wrong, and
excuse me for bringing up such an 'inferior' university. The point is,
this was an added in thing, it had nothing to do with my original claims,
i.e. the source of my original information was not this person. OK????????"

 


>>>You realize, that if this were possible, as you described it; the US will 
>>>stop using the keyhole's, and investing in OOB technology.
>>
>>
>>You should not put words in my mouth Sir. 
>
>	You accuse me of putting words in your mouth, when there is no 
>evidence that I ever did. Please substantiate this slander. 
>	I was just pointing out some consequences if this "report" -that you 
>talked about, but did not hear- was not some hoax.

You put words in my mouth in assuming that my info came from the
person and that this was the laboratory I was refering to in my original
posts. Oh, and by the way, you can just go ahead and stick your attitude
right up your ass Sir. I am tired of it.

>
>
>>Also, I would think you people
>>would be a bit more patient and stop trying to immediately discount what I
>>say just because you have a difficult time believing it. Just hang on to
>>your balls, ok? You'll get the name of the laboratory I referenced, but I
>>can't just snap my fingers and have the name, I have to find it, as I did
>>not keep the name in mind when I heard it.
>
>	When we've heard a multitute of unsubstantiated claims, and outright 
>deceit from others, its hard not to dismiss such far fetched sounding 
>"proofs" as just another poor attempt at science. Especially if you didn't 
>hear it.

Fine then, I won't even bother wasting my time and energy worrying about
getting your proof then. Let's just drop the whole thing then because I
have been wasting lots of precious time just to hopefully please you
people and all you give me is a bunch of nasty remarks that would
insinuate that not only am I a CRAZY-in-the-head Catholic, but I'm also
gullible, ill-informed, and certainly not capable of being as intellectual
as yourselves. You are just TOO high and mighty for me. I should just
crawl back into my hole hey? Stupid Michelle, how dare she insult our
intelligence like that!


Michelle
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: alt.atheism