HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ucacmsu@ucl.ac.uk (Mr Stephen R Usher)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc,comp.windows.news,comp.windows.x,comp.human-factors,alt.religion.computers
Subject: Re: GUIs Considered Harmful
Date: 11 Sep 92 10:25:56 GMT
Organization: Bloomsbury Computing Consortium, London

In article <1992Sep10.145345.17065@sophia.smith.edu> jfieber@sophia.smith.edu (John Fieber) writes:
>In article <oefiyZO00VAt5mSIYY@andrew.cmu.edu> fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu (Faisal Nameer Jawdat) writes:
>>NeXT scrollbars are the ONLY good implementation of this I have seen -
>
>Except for one small detail, scrollbars on the Amiga work exactly
>like those on the NeXT. (or was that the other way around?)
>Difference: clicking in the scrollspace moves the "knob" by the
>height (or width) of the knob.  The difference is with the Amiga,
>I typically do a click to move a short distance and a drag to
>move a long distance.  The NeXT is just the reverse.  Six one,
>half a dozen the other I guess.
>
>>click somewhere in the scroll space and the bar moves right there (the
>>bar is also sized proportionally to the visible space / scrollable
>>space ratio), move the bar by dragging it around, and the workspace
>
>I always took proportional scrollbars for granted until I
>recently started working on a Mac.  If you are going to use up
>precious screen space with scroll bars, they should at least
>convey as much useful information as possible.  In a text editor,
>for example, with a proportional scroll bar you can at a quick
>glance not only tell where you are in a document, but how big the
>document is.  
>
>It really baffles me why other window systems have not adopted
>proportional scroll bars.  It is not like they are a new concept
>or something---the Amiga has been using them for about 7 years
>now.  (And I seriously doubt Commodore would try to sue anybody
>else who used them!)

GEM on the Atari range of computers has the same type of scroll bars which
work in the same way as the Amiga's ones. The Mac seems to be the od one out
in this.

>
>-john
>
>
>-- 
>===jfieber@sophia.smith.edu==================================================


Steve
--
Addresses:-
JANET:-		ucacmsu@uk.ac.ucl or	steve@uk.ac.ox.earth (preferable)
Internet:-	ucacmsu@ucl.ac.uk or	steve@earth.ox.ac.uk (preferable)
Xref: sparky comp.windows.misc:1400 comp.windows.news:669 comp.windows.x:16478 comp.human-factors:2169 alt.religion.computers:754
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (exuptr@exu.ericsson.se)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc,comp.windows.news,comp.windows.x,comp.human-factors,alt.religion.computers
Subject: Re: GUIs Considered Harmful
Date: 10 Sep 92 17:23:25 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Sep10.145345.17065@sophia.smith.edu> jfieber@sophia.smith.edu (John Fieber) writes:

>It really baffles me why other window systems have not adopted
>proportional scroll bars.  It is not like they are a new concept
>or something---the Amiga has been using them for about 7 years
>now.  (And I seriously doubt Commodore would try to sue anybody
>else who used them!)

Microsoft may be more worried about the proportional scrollbars in OS/2

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "This must be Thursday.  I never could get the hang of Thursdays"
                                                       - Douglas Adams
  - Patrick Taylor                                       (Arthur Dent)
    Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                       "Don't let the .se fool you"
    or exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org, exu.exuptr@memo.ericsson.se
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
From: fournes@belay (Who, me?)
Subject: Font editor wanted.
Organization: Belay Enterprises Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 15:54:14 GMT

Forgive me if this has already been asked or if it is in FAQ...
Can anyone tell me if there is a pd font editor for MS-Windows fonts,
out there, and if so, where I can get a copy?

Thanks :-) .

                                        --- Eugen Fournes
                                e-mail: fournes%belay@uunet.uu.net


Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
From: pwm@csis.dit.csiro.au (Peter Milne)
Subject: Making PC beep under Windows 3.1 from Turbo C++
Organization: CSIRO Division of Information Technology
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 23:55:34 GMT

Folks,
I am having trouble working out how to make the PC beep under Windows 3.1
from Turbo C++.  can anyone help?

Thanks,
    Peter	(milne@csis.dit.csiro.au)
From: bs098@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mr. Bobbie Myers)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc,freenet.sci.comp.ibmpc.mswindows
Subject: Small problem with Windows/Word for Windows
Date: 9 Sep 1992 02:16:45 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bs098@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mr. Bobbie Myers)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I have a small problem with either Windows/Word for Windows. I really
can't figure out which one is causing this and therefore am depending
on your help!

While running Word for Windows, I load up the Equation Editor in W4W.
When the window for the Equation Editor appears on the screen, only 
a very small portion of the window's border is visible on the screen,
the remainder is out of the screen's limit to the right! As a result what 
I have to do everytime I use the equation editor (which is pretty often) 
is drag the EqnEditor window into the limits of the my screen. I know 
that may seem like a very small problem but after a while it get PRETTY
annoying!

I tried to find more info on how to correct this problem in several W4W 
texts but couldn't find the answer anywhere. Finally I tried reinstalling
W4W and then loading up EqnEditor. But the same problem appeared again.

I know I can't be the only one facing this problem and therefore was 
hoping that all you experts out tere would be able to provide me with an
answer!

Thanx for your help!

- Bobbie



-- 
Mr. Bobbie Myers                    E-mail: bs098@cleveland.freenet.edu
From: vanwalle@ocpt.ccur.com (Van Wallendael)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: EMM386.exe (Re: Speeding up Win 3.1)
Date: 10 Sep 92 19:56:03 GMT
Organization: Concurrent Computer Corporation, Oceanport NJ
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

Benjamin Wai (wai@sage.cc.purdue.edu) wrote:
: 
: 	Can anyone please explain more about the function of EMM386.EXE?
: 	I was not clever enough to understand fully how it functions from 
: 	the manual"s". The thing I know is that it can push half of my 
: 	drivers up to the high memory block, and free up at least 100K of 
: 	my base memory space.
: 	The main problem came from the parameters, ie, what is and when 
: 	to use noems, ram, etc. 
: 	Also, whenever the EMM386.exe is loaded, pressing CTRL, ALT plus
: 	a random key would simply hang the machine -- even with CTRL, ALT+DEL,
: 	ie, it would not warm boot the computer. Does this meant to happen?
: 
: 	Many thanks in advance for any help.
: 
: 
: 	 - Benjamin Wai  < wai@cn.ecn.purdue.edu > < wai@sage.cc.purdue.edu >
>
> Ben,
>    The EMM386 driver is Microsofts Expanded Memory Manager.  It really
> does 2 things.  1- it enables the Upper Memory Blocks (UMB).  This is 
> the "spare" memory that is in the 384k above 640k and below 1meg limit.
> With EMM386 loaded with the NOEMS parameter - this enables the UMB's but
> does not enable the Expanded memory (does not convert any Extended memory
> to expanded).  2- You can use EMM386 to enable some Expanded Memory by using
> the RAM option.  If you use the RAM option, you get both UMB and Expanded
> memory.  Your machine should not lock up just because you have the EMM driver
> loaded.  Try using the NOEMS option first.  If you're going to use the RAM
> option, make sure that you can allocate a Page Frame successfully.  It will
> tell you, when it loads, when it can't.
> Hope I helped.
> Jeff
From: wai@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Benjamin Wai)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: EMM386.exe (Re: Speeding up Win 3.1)
Date: 8 Sep 92 21:17:09 GMT
Reply-To: wai@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Benjamin Wai)
Organization: Purdue University


	Can anyone please explain more about the function of EMM386.EXE?
	I was not clever enough to understand fully how it functions from 
	the manual"s". The thing I know is that it can push half of my 
	drivers up to the high memory block, and free up at least 100K of 
	my base memory space.
	The main problem came from the parameters, ie, what is and when 
	to use noems, ram, etc. 
	Also, whenever the EMM386.exe is loaded, pressing CTRL, ALT plus
	a random key would simply hang the machine -- even with CTRL, ALT+DEL,
	ie, it would not warm boot the computer. Does this meant to happen?

	Many thanks in advance for any help.


	 - Benjamin Wai  < wai@cn.ecn.purdue.edu > < wai@sage.cc.purdue.edu >
Xref: sparky comp.windows.misc:1394 comp.windows.news:667 comp.windows.x:16448 comp.human-factors:2165 alt.religion.computers:751
From: fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu (Faisal Nameer Jawdat)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc,comp.windows.news,comp.windows.x,comp.human-factors,alt.religion.computers
Subject: Re: GUIs Considered Harmful
Date: 9 Sep 92 22:48:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.oefiyZO00VAt5mSIYY
	<1992Sep9.235620.25510@spider.co.uk>
Organization: Sophomore, Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

mark@spider.co.uk (Mark Valentine) writes:
> 
> Scrollbars are another GUI feature that seem simply to waste real estate
> most of the time.  Most people I point it out to are pleasantly surprised
> to learn that SHIFT-PGUP does the sensible thing by default in xterm (well,
> half-sensible, I customised it to go a full page).  What's more, no scroll-
> bar I've seen has given me the ease of control that a simple pair of keys
> give me (back about four pages? blam, blam, blam, blam! oops, missed it
> there, blam! gotcha!!).

off topic:
not to mention a blatant NeXT plug:
NeXT scrollbars are the ONLY good implementation of this I have seen -
click somewhere in the scroll space and the bar moves right there (the
bar is also sized proportionally to the visible space / scrollable
space ratio), move the bar by dragging it around, and the workspace
(text, picture, whatever) moves accordingly, smoothly, and at the
correct rate (1:1k mapping, where k is the proportion between the
scrollable distance on the bar and in the scrolled object), and the
buttons at the ends of the scrollbar are in pairs so if you miss and
have to back up, you just move 1/8 inch, not all the way to the other
end of the bar
From: jas10@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: Visual Basic and Communication throught API
Date: 12 Sep 92 06:05:37 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton

Hello:
      I hope this is the right group to post this to.

      I would like to know if anyone has any Visual Basic code
      which would show me how to open up a COM port.  I would
      like to use my modem as an auto-dialer.  I have looked through
      the visual basic book and have not found any information except
      that I should use the windows API calls.  Unfortunately,
      a list of API calls was not included with my visual basic
      documentation.

    thanks.
From: beelewm@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: Windows Aplications...What the...?
Date: 13 Sep 92 23:48:10 CDT
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

I was wondering if anyone cold tell me how to get some share-wear windows
applications.  and if possible, E-mail me.  I am also looking for neat things
to do to my windows environment.  my latest discovery is turning gifs into 
bitmaps and using things like nude pictures of Cathy Ireland for wallpater...
ok so I am behind the times...sue me...anyway, all help would be apreciated, 
thanks

Catch 22 ---------Marc Beeler-----------Beelewm@wkuvx1.bitnet

Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
From: robert@ctpm.uq.oz.au (Robert Merlicek)
Subject: producing help files
Organization: Centre for Language Teaching and Research, Uni of Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
Date: 15 Sep 92 22:53:08 GMT

I wish to produce help files for a windows app and would like to 
know if there is any packages that will allow me to do it, more
easily than HC ?. What about robohelp?

Thanks in advance
Robert


--
*****************************************************************************
* Robert Merlicek           * "Mans mind once streched by a new idea        *
* robert@pest.ctpm.uq.oz.au *  never regains it's original dimensions" -OWH *
*****************************************************************************
Xref: sparky comp.windows.misc:1404 comp.windows.x:16485 comp.human-factors:2177
From: english@alicudi.usc.edu (Joe English)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc,comp.windows.x,comp.human-factors
Subject: Scrollbars (was Re: GUIs Considered Harmful)
Date: 10 Sep 1992 12:46:32 -0700
Organization: Nerds of Action
Distribution: world
Reply-To: joe@trystero.art.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: alicudi.usc.edu



In article <oefiyZO00VAt5mSIYY@andrew.cmu.edu>, fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu (Faisal Nameer Jawdat) writes:
|> mark@spider.co.uk (Mark Valentine) writes:
|> > 
|> > Scrollbars are another GUI feature that seem simply to waste real estate
|> > most of the time.  Most people I point it out to are pleasantly surprised
|> > to learn that SHIFT-PGUP does the sensible thing by default in xterm (well,
|> > half-sensible, I customised it to go a full page).
|>  [...]
|> off topic:
|> not to mention a blatant NeXT plug:
|> NeXT scrollbars are the ONLY good implementation of this I have seen -
|> click somewhere in the scroll space and the bar moves right there (the
|> bar is also sized proportionally to the visible space / scrollable
|> space ratio),

I rather like the xterm/xman scrollbar behaviour, now that
I've figured out how to work it -- Clicking/dragging button 2
does the same thing described above, clicking button 1 pushes
the line next to the pointer to the top of the screen, and clicking
button 3 pulls the top line down next to the pointer.  Very handy.
The bindings are a little weird (I would have swapped the button1/button2
actions; it seems a bit more intuitive that ``move the thumb here''
is the primary action and should be bound to the primary button),
and the entire thumb can scroll off the bottom, but other than that
it works well.

|> [...] and the
|> buttons at the ends of the scrollbar are in pairs so if you miss and
|> have to back up, you just move 1/8 inch, not all the way to the other
|> end of the bar.

Agreed!  When I first saw a picture of the NeXT UI this was the
first thing that jumped out at me.  Why didn't anyone else 
think of that?  It's much more sensible than the Mac/Motif layout,
and let's not even *mention* the horrifying things OpenLook 
``elevators'' do...

--Joe English

  joe@trystero.art.com
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
From: kmo@sae.com (Mike Ovington)
Subject: Re: GUIs Considered Harmful
Organization: Software Architecture & Engineering, Inc.
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:20:04 GMT

In article <18oc3lINNh58@early-bird.think.com>, barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep10.145345.17065@sophia.smith.edu> jfieber@sophia.smith.edu (John Fieber) writes:
|> >It really baffles me why other window systems have not adopted
|> >proportional scroll bars.
|> 
|> What do you mean?  Most other GUIs have proportional scroll bars.  Open
|> Look, Motif, Athena widgets, and CLIM all have proportional scroll bars.  I
|> haven't used Windows, but since Motif is styled after Windows, I assume it
|> does as well.  The only GUI I've ever used that doesn't have them is the
|> Mac.
|> 
Windows does not have proportional scroll bars.
-- 
________________________________________________________________________________
    Michael S. Ovington                         Template Software 
       uunet!sae!mikeo                   13100 Worldgate Drive, Suite 340       
        mikeo@sae.com                         Herndon, VA 22070-4382
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
From: kevinlu@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Kevin Lu)
Subject: Printing with an epson
Organization: Monash University General Access Unix
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 01:16:51 GMT




Hi, i have had the problem bugging me for the last 6 months.

When i print in windows the the print manager on an Epson Lq-1050 with cut
sheet feeder, the print mamager always ejects another page after print A page.

I.e if i print 6 pages of text in WinWord 2.0, i get 12 pages out of the
printer. Now i have done all the setting in Print Manager and set the
printer to 70/6 inch length and to not skip over perforations. Does anyone
know what i'm doing wrong?? HAs anyone had this kind of problem as well??

Thanks

  +----------------------------------------+-------------------------------+
  |  Kevin Lu                              | Monash University             |
  |  Email: kevinlu@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au  | Clayton, Victoria             |
  |                                        | Australia                     |
 
   
   

Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
From: chungy2@aix.rpi.edu (Yau Felix Chung)
Subject: Speeding up Win 3.1
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 17:19:26 GMT

Hello everyone!  I was wondering if someone could help me out.
It seems that ever since I installed windows 3.1, everything in
my system seems to run slower, e.g. loading applications such as
Ami Pro 3.0.

My config.sys file looks like this:

DEVICE=D:\WINDOWS\HIMEM.SYS
DEVICE=D:\WINDOWS\EMM386.EXE RAM 2048 
DEVICEHIGH=D:\WINDOWS\SMARTDRV.EXE 512 256
DOS=HIGH,UMB
DEVICEHIGH=E:\ATIULTRA\VANSI.SYS
DEVICE=E:\ATIULTRA\RAMBIOS.SYS
FILES= 25
BUFFERS=20
STACKS=0,0
SHELL=E:\DOS\COMMAND.COM E:\DOS\ /E:200 /P
FCBS=1
LASTDRIVE=G

and I am running Win 3.1 on a 386-25 Gateway with 6.25 Meg and a 165Mb ESDI
hard drive.

Any suggestions are welcomed......-F.

Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
From: bruceb@ctpm.uq.oz.au (Bruce Blackshaw)
Subject: windows help screens
Summary: use of Robohelp for writing windows help
Keywords: windows help robohelp
Organization: Centre for Language Teaching and Research, Uni of Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
Date: 14 Sep 92 06:39:33 GMT

I am interested in writing Windows help for a windows application
I have written - the BC++ method seems messy, does anyone have any 
better ideas?  I have heard of a product called Robohelp which makes
the process a lot quicker - has anyone used Robohelp or know where I
can get it from?  Please email bruceb@ctpm.uq.oz.au if you have any
ideas.  Thanks
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
From: kiwong@zeus.calpoly.edu (Kinsley Wong)
Subject: Re: Speeding up Win 3.1
Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 06:46:08 GMT

In article <fa2y-lh@rpi.edu> chungy2@aix.rpi.edu (Yau Felix Chung) writes:
>Hello everyone!  I was wondering if someone could help me out.
>It seems that ever since I installed windows 3.1, everything in
>my system seems to run slower, e.g. loading applications such as
>Ami Pro 3.0.
>
>My config.sys file looks like this:
>
>DEVICE=D:\WINDOWS\HIMEM.SYS
>DEVICE=D:\WINDOWS\EMM386.EXE RAM 2048 
>DEVICEHIGH=D:\WINDOWS\SMARTDRV.EXE 512 256
>DOS=HIGH,UMB
>DEVICEHIGH=E:\ATIULTRA\VANSI.SYS
>DEVICE=E:\ATIULTRA\RAMBIOS.SYS
>FILES= 25
>BUFFERS=20
>STACKS=0,0
>SHELL=E:\DOS\COMMAND.COM E:\DOS\ /E:200 /P
>FCBS=1
>LASTDRIVE=G
>
>and I am running Win 3.1 on a 386-25 Gateway with 6.25 Meg and a 165Mb ESDI
>hard drive.
>
>Any suggestions are welcomed......-F.
>
I thing if you change STACKS=9,615 it might help.
Definitely REM out Shell=E:....
good luck



-- 
Internet:  kiwong@iris.calpoly.edu               Voice Mail:  (805) 756-5603
Bitnet:    DU338@oasis.calpoly.edu                     Fax :  (805) 756-5666
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ Surfing, Scuba, Sky Diving, Skating, Mountain Biking ==> Adrenaline Junkies
From: sd344@city.ac.uk (SHARPE P A)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: move/resize won't work in twm from the keyboard
Date: 4 Sep 92 12:32:11 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: The City University

Does anyone know why the following entry in my .twmrc doesn't
work.

"F7"    = m     : all  : f.move
"F8"    = m     : all  : f.resize

When I press meta<F7> (or F8) in a window it just bleeps
and doesn't seem to have an action for the keysym.

(email please to sd344@city.ac.uk)


-- 
Paul Sharpe, Unix System Programmer, City University

+44 (0)71 477 8000 x3758
Internet: P.A.Sharpe@city.ac.uk
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
From: sinan@Mtesol.boeing.COM (Sinan Karasu)
Subject: Re: Xterminal-Server ratio wanted
Organization: The Internet
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 20:35:58 GMT


> From xpert-mailer@expo.lcs.mit.edu Wed Sep  2 00:19:06 1992
> Date: 1 Sep 92 23:53:09 GMT
> From: tom@uts.cc.wayne.edu (Thomas Richard Stevenson)
> Organization: Wayne State Univ.
> Subject: Re: Xterminal-Server ratio wanted
> Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin,comp.windows.x
> Sender: xpert-request@expo.lcs.mit.edu
> To: xpert@expo.lcs.mit.edu
> Content-Length: 972
> 
> tucker@bedford.progress.COM (Kyle Tucker) writes:
> 
> >Hi all (again),
> >	We are currently performing an initial investigation into upgrading
> >our present dumb-terminal based user environment to a X windows based one.
> >We are weighing all the dis/advantages of PCs, Xterminals and workstations
> >and look favorably at Xterminals from a maintenance standpoint. I use one
> >myself and see no lack of functionality. We would like any opinions on this
> >decision itself. And if we do go with Xterminals, then the question of how
> >many Xterminals running off of how many Sparcs, Sparc2s, Solbournes, etc. We
> >would like to hear about any success/horror stories about implementing such
> >a configuration and performance issues regarding Xterm/Server ratios which
> >seem to work well. These users will mainly be running Progress applications
> >and some word-processing, news readers and email UAs.
> 
> We are thinking of doing the same thing. We would also find this information
> very useful.
> 
I suggest Sun's new lowcost IPC workstations. You get a full color workstation for
$5995 list (including disk). Then you can use them as X-terminals or if
you want to , use them as standalone or client/server workstations.
Sinan
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
From: mouse@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu (der Mouse)
Subject: Re: Strange keyboard mapping for the hpux-8.0x X server ...
Organization: McGill Research Centre for Intelligent Machines
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 92 20:38:47 GMT

In article <smr.715865780@hitkw14>, smr@hitkw14.pki-nbg.philips.de (S.Riehm) writes:
> gms@cv.hp.com (George Sachs) writes:
>> The Mode_switch keysym is bound to the Mod1 modifier, making it the
>> Group modifier.  That is why you are seeing the key bindings that
>> you reported.
> Here is the output from xmodmap -pm.
[...]
> note I have no `Mode_switch' listed even, and yet I international
> characters when I hit Meta_L ( Alt_L ) in combination with a key.

This is something else, then: whatever client you're typing to is
interpreting that combination as a request to set the 8th bit on the
generated character.  That these come out as "international" characters
is merely a coincidence of the coding scheme the font in use uses.

> PS: what _exactly_ does "Mode_switch" do?

The "Keyboards" section of the protocol document describes this in
detail.  It's rather long to quote here; if you want, I'll be glad to
mail you the relevant pieces.

					der Mouse

			    mouse@larry.mcrcim.mcgill.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
From: chaz@supplytech.COM (Mr. Chaz Bullock)
Subject: mailing list request
Organization: The Internet
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 20:29:06 GMT


I am interested in being put on your X mailing list.

	chaz@supplytech.com