HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jdt29225@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jazzy J )
Subject: Re: David Falk
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 08:04:31 GMT

radkel@canctr.mc.duke.edu writes:
> Michigan star Chris Webber on experience: "Being older doesn't mean that 
>you're better.  I think it's good if a sophomore like David Falk wins the
>Heisman trophy."
> Thinking ahead, Chris?

	I guess Chris doesn't follow football too well either.  It's
	Marshall, not David...

	Jazzy J

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   " I try to discover a little something to make me sweeter..."   --Erasure |
|   Jazzy J               jdt29225@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu         U-Illinois/Urbana |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: tamada@cheshire.oxy.edu (Michael K. Tamada)
Subject: Breakaway Rims (was: Statistical inflation?)
Organization: Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041 USA.
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 09:19:30 GMT

In article <1992Dec13.074337.6082@msc.cornell.edu> hillyard@msc.cornell.edu writes:

>When did break away rims come into use?

     It was shortly after Darryl Dawkins broke two backboards --
maybe 1982?  Well to narrow it down, it was when Bill Robinzine
was still playing, because he was the victim of one of those dunks
(Dawkins called it something like "the Chocolate Thunder Flying,
Robinzine Crying, Glass Breaking, Earth Quaking, I Am Jam).
     Also, the next year, when the NBA had tightened the rules about
hanging on the rim, Lonnie Shelton was still with the Sonics.  He
was one of the first victims of the re-vitalized anti-hanging rules:
not only was it a technical, but also a $250 fine.  Shelton was
clearly guilty:  he hung on the rim so hard that it bent and the
game was delayed a half hour while they replaced it.
     After the game Shelton was seeing walking out of the locker room
with the bent rim under his arm.  When asked what he was going to
do with it, he said, "I might as well take it home.  I paid for it."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |__	       o
  | W			   Mike Tamada
		  |\	   Institutional Research Office
		   \O	   Occidental College
		    |      tamada@oxy.edu
		   /|
		  | |

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: markham@brtph597.bnr.ca (Andrew Markham P205)
Subject: Jon Barry stats
Keywords: Jon Barry
Organization: BNR Inc. RTP, NC
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:32:59 GMT

After all the talk about Jon Barry, I just thought people might be 
interested in seeing his stats thus far...



Player  G Min  FGM FGA  FG%  FTM FTA  FT%  R  A  S  TO  Blk  PFs  Pts
------  - ---  --- --- ----  --- --- ----  -  -  -  --  ---  ---  ---
Barry   4  14    1   9 .111    4   6 .667  2  3  1   2    0    1    6 

Three-point: 0-4 (.000)



BTW, his 11.1% is THE WORST in the NBA as of 12/13.

-- 
Andrew W. Markham (markham@bnr.ca)
Bell Northern Research, Inc.
From: belo@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de (Bela M. Voigt)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Who are Wingate (cha) and Young (det)?
Date: 16 Dec 1992 11:03:33 GMT
Organization: ZRZ/TU-Berlin
NNTP-Posting-Host: centaur.cs.tu-berlin.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

robinr@prism.CS.ORST.EDU (ROBIN RYAN NEIL) writes:

>I need help figuring out who "Young" is off of Detroit and who "Wingate" is 
>off of Charlotte. If anyone knows I'd appreciate it if you dropped me a line.
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Ryan N. Robin   (robinr@prism.cs.orst.edu)

Wingate is David Wingate. I think he is a former Spur!?!

Bela.
belo@cs.tu-berlin.de
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: dwarner@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (David J.)
Subject: Re: Karl Malone mumblings...
Keywords: mumble
Organization: Blue Riddle Productions
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 20:18:21 GMT

In article <Bz1vsp.5qz@javelin.sim.es.com> Bill Holt writes:

>|>From: dwarner@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (David J.)
>
>|>Gotta agree with him - Karl Malone is a prick, and at least half the Naptown
>|>press agrees with me.  I tried talking to him after the Pacers-Jazz game a
>|>while back, and got one of the biggest blowoffs I've ever gotten, and I 
>|>watched him do the same thing to about three or four other people.  I talked
>|>with a couple of guys in the press room afterward, and got similar reactions
>|>from each of 'em.  One guy from the Indy Recorder told me, "Figures.  I 
>|>don't like his ass anyway."  Well, neither do I.
>|>
>|>Chris Mullin gave me a similar blow-off after a Pacers-Warriors game last
>|>season.  Maybe it has something to do with being on the Dream Team bench.
>|>No wonder they picked CL over Shaq... 
>
>If I remember correctly, the Jazz flew out of town right after the Pacers game
>to play the Bullets in DC the next night. So maybe he was in a hurry. Why does
>that make him a prick?  

Well, the Jazz didn't appear to be in any hurry to catch a plane, but that was
beside the point.

>Also, why would the press be so interested in him 
>anyway, other than to regurgitate this silly, stupid, ongoing bruhaha over his
>statement concerning HIV, AIDS, and the NBA.  Maybe Karl just treats the press
>the same way they treat him.  Let's give the guy a break!

I could have cared less.  I wanted to know about the game, and I didn't ask
any of those blood rule questions anyway, even though I had the perfect
opportunity to gauge his reaction (John Stockton caught an elbow and needed
a few stitches in the second quarter).  What I'm probably missing here is
what was written about Malone before this particular game.  Maybe the Naptown
media had taken some potshots at Malone in the past (after all, the game in
question was Utah's first win in Market Square Arena since 1985), but all I
know was that I saw Malone shrug off most of the press corps while I was in
the room, and he didn't take any more kindly to me.

Certainly I wouldn't take kindly to anyone who had written some nasty stuff
about me in a newspaper, but I hadn't even written a word yet, and I never
did, either, except for rsbp, and I knew if I had to work with these people
on a daily basis, I'd shrug it off and be a little nicer than the Mailman.

-- 
--David J.-----------------------*********************************************
--Blue Riddle Productions 1993---   "RAP IS AN ART/TURN UP THE MICROPHONE"
--dwarner@silver.ucs.indiana.edu-          Coming in 1993 from BRP.
--The Science is upon us...------*********************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: icsu0182@cs.montana.edu (Sean)
Subject: Re: Jimmy Jackson to Sacto
Organization: Montana State University, Dept. of Computer Science, Bozeman MT 59717
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 05:01:06 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.223541.14265@zip.eecs.umich.edu> raghu@nairobi.eecs.umich.edu (Raghu Mani) writes:
>In article <1gj128INNfpi@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu>, rodmur@ecst.csuchico.edu (Dale Harris) writes:
>|> 
>|> Frankly, I believe for the Kings to trade away Lionel Simmons and a 1st
>|> Round draft pick for JJ would be a mistake, JJ just isn't worth it for the
>|> Kings for one and frankly I think the Kings need to look for a bigger
>|> center (need to get those stinking rebounds).
>|> 
>|> -- 
>|>    __        _                     Dale A. Harris  {rodmur@ecst.csuchico.edu} 
>
>
>Agreed. JJ might be a great player but the Kings are already overloaded with
>shooting guards - and I don't think JJ has the size to play small forward in
>the NBA.

I think that is what they were saying about LJ when he came out last year 
too, and now look at him!!!  I don't think size has a lot to do with it at 
the small forward, it's how the small fwd is used that matters...If you did
something like GS did with Run TMC, then height really isn't an issue.

Sean


-- 
Sean Reid                     |"Baseball is a rather simple game. You throw the 
Dept. of Computer Science     | ball, you hit the ball, you catch the ball...  
Montana State University      | Sometimes you win. Sometimes you lose. Sometimes
icsu0182@caesar.cs.montana.edu| it rains."    --  Eppy Calvin "NUKE" LaLouche
From: bretwood@oregon.uoregon.edu (Bret Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Jordan and Drexler
Date: 14 Dec 92 20:13:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: oregon.bretwood.13
Organization: University of Oregon
NNTP-Posting-Host: dtyler1.uoregon.edu

In article <1ganu8INNhmi@gaia.ucs.orst.edu> curt@oce.orst.edu (Curt Vandetta) writes:

>In article <1992Dec11.095247.26654@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> kayman@csd-d-5.Stanford.EDU (Robert Kayman) writes:
>>In article <1992Dec10.231938.13621@rti.rti.org> wgr@rti.rti.org writes:
>>>In article <bretwood.11@oregon.uoregon.edu> bretwood@oregon.uoregon.edu (Bret Wood) writes:
>>>>I thought it was really unique that the refs would let Jordan enter the
>>>>key for a full TWO STEPS before the ball actually hit the rim.  
>>>>
>>>>It's surprising the Bulls aren't undefeated when they get calls like that!
>>>
>>>I thought you were allowed into the lane as soon as the ball leaves the
>>>shooter's hand.  Otherwise there's a lane violation on every free throw
>>>in the NBA.
>>
>>
>>This is very true.  You are allowed into the lane as soon as the shooter
>>releases the ball.

>  Yes, but the shooter can not enter the lane until the ball hits the rim,
>  and I thought that this applied to anyone not lined up on the key as well?

I'm also a High School BBall Ref.

The shooter must remain in the semicircle until the ball hits the rim.
Any other player not lined up along the key must stay behind the freethrow
line and outside of the semicircle until the ball hits the rim.  If Jordan
would have started along the lane, it would have been a great play.  Since
Jordan came from behind the freethrow line, it was blatantly illegal.

-Bret Wood
-A Rabid Blazers Fan, and a Basketball Ref.
From: tazumar@bcsaic.boeing.com (Ronald Tazuma)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Karl Malone mumblings...
Date: 12 Dec 92 00:24:56 GMT
Organization: Boeing Computer Services, Seattle

Karl seems to be in touch with his natural feelings of mortality when he
said to the effect he couldn't play as hard or would have reservations
about making hard contact with someone known to have HIV.  He as well as
anyone else probably would feel that way inside, he just made it
public.  For that matter, lots of people avoid making contact with
people with colds or infections, because they know how those diseases are
transmitted.  For HIV, you don't want to have any open sores or cuts
exposed to the virus.  And you do get cuts and scratches playing ball.  


I don't think Karl should be put down for making such comments as long
as he displays the upmost professionalism when doing so.  


The fear of not knowing who's got HIV and who doesn't has got to be
driving them crazy...at least added stress to their lives.....just a thought.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Subject: Re: Suns atop the NBA/Trade with Spurs?
Followup-To: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Reply-To: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 22:15:52 GMT

In article <BzBByA.7Bo@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> dwarner@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (David J.) writes:
>
>If the deal is right, the Spurs will make it.  Somebody on here said something
>to the effect of KJ for Elliot straight up.  If Westphal thinks Negele Knight
>is capable of leading the Suns to the promised land, and Knight turns out to
>be just as good, I say go for it, but I doubt that this one is going to happen.
>If it weren't for Elliot, who would Robinson have (aside from Lloyd Daniels)
>to help him?  Very little if anything.

I'm not sure how well KJ fits in with this team anymore - they were 2-2
with him and like 16-2 without him.  Negele has had problems this year,
but the Suns keep on winning.  They are more versitile now and don't have
to rely on KJ's penetration to score points.  In fact, Majerle and Ainge
are getting the minutes at crunch time and that combo seems to be pretty
effective.  How long will KJ be able to keep is penetration advantage?
He's not getting any younger.  Another consideration is Dumas - if he's as
good as everybody's making him out to be, why give up KJ for Elliot.  Are
the Suns weaker at SF currently than they would be with no KJ and Negele
at the point?  I'd wait and see how Dumas pans out.  Speaking of Dumas...

In the paper today - Dumas is in Phx, will attend the Suns game tonight and
will likely be released from suspension this week, even as early as today.
The league will give them "time" before they need to make a roster change,
but Westphal said he will activate him as soon as the league lets him.  He
gave no indication on roster moves but said "it would depend on our injury
situation" (hey you on the end of the bench, doesn't your hamstring hurt).
--
Harry Koehnemann			Arizona State University
koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu		Computer Science Department
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: hillyard@msc.cornell.edu
Subject: Re: Jimmy Jackson update
Originator: hillyard@tiger.msc.cornell.edu
Reply-To: hillyard@msc.cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell-Materials-Science-Center
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:41:53 GMT

From article <57365@olivea.atc.olivetti.com>, by rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith):
[...]
> 
> A few points. One yes it seems ass backwards to pay draft picks more than
> established players, but its the status quo so Jackson has every right to
> assume he will be dealt with in the "normal" manner. Two, yes Jimmy has 
> been offered alot of money, but not what a player drafted in this draft
> in his position is worth(based on the established market value of players
> picked before and after him). He entered the draft early because he was
> told he would be a top 5 pick, would get top 5 money, and he had nothing
> left to prove in college. Had he known what his salary offer would be, he
> may very well have opted to finish school, so in a sense the NBA lied to
> him. NBA teams love the great kids to come out early, agents love it too,
> but apparently they do not love paying them equal value.

Just a note here.  According to everyones favorite in the USA Today (Vescey),
JJ's contract is the equal of Laetners money wise for the same years.  Laetners
contract just has a couple of additional years at a high rate which Dallas
is not offering.  So JJ is basically getting offered top 5 money, just not
the long term deal with the extremely high last few years--which, if he
is as good as everyone keeps implying, he would end up getting, if not more,
anyway.

Personally, this seems the ideal situation to me.  He gets reasonable bucks
for the first few years, gets a lot of playing time on a crappy team, and is 
then able to jump ship to a contender when he is entering his prime.

SEH
From: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: David "The Agent From Hell" Falk
Date: 14 Dec 92 18:36:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: ennews.1992Dec14.183611.16801
Reply-To: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Followup-To: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Organization: Arizona State University

In article <1992Dec14.153713.13287@ll.mit.edu> nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith) writes:
>
>you're entitled to your opinion.  infact there are a lot of things in
>what you said that i agree with - and he should probably be the highest
>paid NBA player.  but they're all overpaid.  just think of the cost
>of shoes ("its gotta be the shoes") nowadays!  people get killed over
>them now.  i'm not saying that it's MJ's fault, or any other player,
>but the average NBA salary is way up there.  the cost of going to a
>game is a significant chunk for me.  when free TV coverage is replaced
>by PPV or cable everywhere, then i may give up following these guys.

If you want to find the problem - look in the mirror.  Advertising is
everything.  Market share is everything.  But it only works if we buy
their products.  What kind of shoes do you own?  I'm sitting here with
a pair of Nikes (they run wider than anyone but Cons and Cons don't
make good court shoes anymore - my excuse).

Nike created a huge demand for their product (as you pount out, people
have killed for it) and I agree it's not right for Nike to exploit it.
They definitly target a class of people that can barely afford to put
food on the table, let alone buy $130 sneakers.  But, it's our (their?)
fault as well for letting it work.  Again PPV will only work if we decide
we'll pay the money.

Brings up an interesting point.  I read this thing on Boxing and how
that since they went to PPV, only established could afford to watch the
fight.  In other words kids that would be interested in boxing didn't
get to see any fights and it has caused a decline in the interest in
boxing.  Stretch that decline out 20 years and all of a sudden there's
noone willing to pay $50 to get a boxing match in their homes anymore.
WIll the same happen to the NBA in the next 20+ years?
--
Harry Koehnemann			Arizona State University
koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu		Computer Science Department
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D. Oliver III)
Subject: Re: Shaq vs. Wilt
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 03:29:18 GMT

The three-second rule was due to Mikan, I'm pretty sure.  When Wilt came
along was when they widened the lane, and when Kareem (nee Lew) came they
outlawed the dunk.

So how come they didn't outlaw the blocked shot when Russell played?

--
____________________________
	Jim Oliver  
	oliver@athena.mit.edu /	joliver@hstbme.mit.edu
	oliver%mitwccf.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
From: nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: HELP ME!!!  Need all scores up to today....
Date: 16 Dec 92 19:40:11 GMT
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory

In article <BzD4Dw.Iu9@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jcp29389@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (I Spike - Therefore I Am) writes:
>Can anybody PLEASE help me out?
>
>I would like a record of the scores of all games up until today.  I need this
>for every team for the entire season.  If someone has this info, i would
>greatly appreciate it.  THANKS in advance.
>
>			JAY  PARDEE

  ok, one more time...  ftp ftp.wustl.edu
                        cd /doc/misc/nbastats
                        look for a subdirectory facts

in there is the best source i can think of for scores.

- nate
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: tdexte16@ursa.calvin.edu (Terrence Dexter)
Subject: Boxscore: orl 103 - det 108
Organization: Calvin College
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 18:11:02 GMT


orl 103, det 108   09dec92

orl ( 8- 8)      min  fgm fga 3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as pf st to bk tc ej ff  pts
turner,jeff       20   1   2   0  0   0  0   2  4   1  4  1  1  0  0  0  0    2
skiles,scott      48  13  25   8 12   4  5   2  4   4  4  1  1  0  0  0  0   38
o'neal,shaquille  41   7  16   0  0   3 10   4 11   0  6  0  3  5  0  0  0   17
anderson,nick     29   4  13   1  4   1  4   1  4   3  2  4  2  0  0  0  0   10
skiles,scott      37   5  10   1  1   1  2   1  4  11  5  0  6  0  0  0  0   12
tolbert,tom       21   3   6   2  2   0  0   1  3   1  0  0  1  0  0  0  0    8
bowie,anthony      5   0   2   0  0   0  0   1  2   0  2  0  0  0  0  0  0    0
green,litterial    7   2   3   0  0   0  0   0  1   2  3  0  0  0  0  0  0    4
kite,greg          5   0   0   0  0   0  0   0  0   0  2  0  0  0  0  0  0    0
royal,donald       4   0   0   0  0   0  0   0  0   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0    0
kerr,steve        23   5   8   2  4   0  0   0  1   2  4  2  0  0  0  0  0   12
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
orl totals       240  40  85  14 23   9 21  12 34  24 32  8 14  5  0  0  0  103
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .471   .609   .429       team rebs 14

det ( 6- 9)      min  fgm fga 3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as pf st to bk tc ej ff  pts
woolridge,orlando 33   7  12   0  0   3  4   0  1   2  2  1  3  0  0  0  0   17
rodman,dennis     45   3   6   3  4   1  4   7 22   2  2  1  4  1  0  0  0   10
laimbeer,bill     33   4   9   0  0   0  0   2  8   2  5  1  2  0  0  0  0    8
dumars,joe        38  15  26   2  6   7  9   3  4   7  2  0  0  0  0  0  0   39
thomas,isiah      38   6  13   0  1   4  8   4  8  12  2  1  2  0  0  0  0   16
mills,terry       18   3   9   0  0   0  0   0  1   0  2  0  1  0  0  0  0    6
polynice,olden    15   1   5   0  0   0  4   3  4   1  3  0  0  0  0  0  0    2
young,danny       12   1   3   0  1   0  0   0  2   3  0  0  2  0  0  0  0    2
glass,gerald       8   3   3   0  0   2  2   0  0   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0    8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
det totals       240  43  86   5 12  17 31  19 50  29 18  4 14  1  0  0  0  108
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .500   .417   .548       team rebs 16
procedure technicals 2

orl   23  28  24  28  -  103
det   26  27  29  26  -  108

attendance 21454, time 2:15, officials: EMiddleton,JCrawford,LGrillo
--
|  - Terry Dexter, Calvin College  ||G|     I teleported home one night
|  -  tdexte16@ursa.calvin.edu     ||E|     With Ron and Sid and Meg
+----------------------------------+|B|     Ron stole Meggie's heart away
 Quote from Douglas Adams (RATEOTU)  -      And I got Sidney's leg.
From: dougs@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Steele)
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:00:30 GMT
Subject: Re: Team Standings and Stats
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro

   Oops, I've succeded in overdosing myself with stats!  Below is the real
ranking of teams for the last few weeks.

Doug

                   Avg Opponent's  Avg.                    Rating
     Team Name        Position    Margin  ( W -  L -  T)   Points
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 1 Phoenix              15.12      6.88   ( 7 -  1 -  0)   8.76
 2 LAClippers           13.86      8.43   ( 6 -  1 -  0)   8.24
 3 Utah                 19.43     13.86   ( 6 -  1 -  0)   7.76
 4 Indiana              13.33      2.78   ( 6 -  3 -  0)   6.52
 5 NewJersey            11.43      2.71   ( 5 -  2 -  0)   6.24
 6 NewYork              15.22      7.67   ( 6 -  3 -  0)   5.71
 7 LALakers             18.00     12.00   ( 6 -  2 -  0)   5.31
 8 SanAntonio           16.38      5.88   ( 5 -  3 -  0)   5.07
 9 Chicago              12.38     -2.88   ( 4 -  4 -  0)   1.97
10 Charlotte             8.75     -4.00   ( 4 -  4 -  0)   1.96
11 Houston              16.14      5.43   ( 4 -  3 -  0)   1.96
12 Portland             12.78      1.78   ( 5 -  4 -  0)   1.64
13 Atlanta              11.75      2.00   ( 5 -  3 -  0)   0.97
14 Detroit              16.43      6.00   ( 5 -  2 -  0)   0.93
15 GoldenState          15.00      2.86   ( 4 -  3 -  0)  -0.22
16 Cleveland            12.62     -1.25   ( 3 -  5 -  0)  -1.18
17 Seattle              17.75      5.50   ( 4 -  4 -  0)  -1.30
18 Boston               17.25      2.62   ( 5 -  3 -  0)  -1.33
19 Denver                9.75     -7.88   ( 2 -  6 -  0)  -1.82
20 Philadelphia         12.29     -6.71   ( 2 -  5 -  0)  -3.60
21 Washington           13.50     -3.12   ( 3 -  5 -  0)  -4.04
22 Sacramento           10.57     -3.71   ( 1 -  6 -  0)  -4.11
23 Orlando              11.86     -9.43   ( 1 -  6 -  0)  -7.32
24 Minnesota            10.50    -16.83   ( 1 -  5 -  0)  -8.15
25 Miami                14.00     -4.57   ( 1 -  6 -  0)  -8.44
26 Milwaukee            12.33    -13.44   ( 2 -  7 -  0) -11.06
27 Dallas               11.83    -19.67   ( 0 -  6 -  0) -16.25

Notes: 10 percent of wins  = 21.00.
       Average home margin =  5.59.
       Biggest win: NY 112 - CHI 75.
       Avg points per game = 211.30.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro