HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: ...3? months, and I still can't install 2.0...
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 01:46:42 GMT

In article <laird.721789380@stable.ecn.purdue.edu> laird@stable.ecn.purdue.edu (Kyler Laird) writes:
>Well, I thought enough time had passed, so I took another hack at
>installing OS/2 2.0.  This time I didn't do it on the network
>server, though.  (I'm pessimistic.)
>I didn't get any further, but I do have more data points to look at.
>For those interested in a challenge (Timothy?), my situation:
>Northgate machines - 386DX/33 16MB RAM, 2*386SX/20 8MB RAM, 486DX/33 16MB RAM
>IDE drives
>all are running OS/2 1.3 with flakey floppy drive accessiblity  (OS/2 thinks
>	it's a 360K drive no matter what I set the CMOS to.  It can read
>	720K disks, but formats to 360K.)
>When I reboot after the initial part of the 2.0 install, I am unable to
>access the floppy (3.5" 1.44MB) drive.  I can boot from the 2.0 (or 1.3)
>install disk and access the drive without problems.  Even with the HD
>configured to boot SYSINST1.EXE (like the install disk), the floppy
>remains inaccessible.
>I tried a patched IBM1FLPY.ADD long ago with no change observed.  My latest
>call to IBM came up with a pointer to IBM1SFLPY.ADD (9.3 file name???!!!),
>but the date was older than the one that I had gotten originally (I think).
>So...something different happens when booting from the fixed disk than does
>when booting from floppy.  But what?  My config.sys looks almost identical
>to the one on Install Disk 1.

My hunch (and it is only that) is that there's something wrong with
the hard disk/floppy disk adapter (which is probably one of those
IDE/floppy combos).  If you have one handy, try a substitute card
(preferably of a different brand).  I would also check any jumpers on
the card itself (to, for example, make sure that the floppies are set
to the primary addresses, correct DMA channel, and whatnot).

I would look for possible DMA conflicts (the floppy drive does use
DMA).  Network card, perhaps?

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
From: jtn@moscom.com (John Nielsen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Missing country additional info
Summary: added support for remoable media
Date: 20 Nov 92 13:14:14 GMT
Organization: Moscom Corp., E. Rochester, NY
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.3 beta PL7]

Let me elaborate alittle more on the missing country.sys file

I bought the future domain tmc-860 card to drive my sydos removable
harddrive. My current system configuration is:

	Gateway 2000 386,33
	diamond speed star video
	1.4,1.2 floppy
	120 ide hard drive
	archive tape backup
	soundblaster
	ati 2400 internal modem
	Bootmanager 1meg
	c: 10meg primary (fat)
	d: 109meg extended (hpfs)

All worked well with my segate st-01/02 card although I did not have access
to my removable drive, hence I bought the future domain which ibm has drivers
for. I installed the fd8xx.add as a BASDEV and ibmint13.i13 as recommended
in the csd readme file. When I boot with the drive plugged into the card
I get the message "can't find file d:\os2\system\country.sys please correct
the problem and reboot." When I unplug the drive but the card is in I can
boot but I get the message that fd8xx.add is ignored.

Could my d: drive be remapped somehow to a different drive letter?

Any suggestions would save me from pulling my hair out.   Thanks!!!!   

-- 
John Nielsen   jtn@moscom.com		{rit,tropix,ur-valhalla}!moscom!jtn
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: copyini vs cpyini
Keywords: OS2SYS.INI file size growing
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 21:31:13 GMT

In article <10028@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum) writes:
>>The cpyini program that I an d (I suspect) most people are using is the
>>one in the hobbes uploads directory, which does not have a companion program.
>>In my opinion, it is much easier to use than the checkini/copyini programs
>>which have been around for quite some time now.
>I just checked this out. Except for the name change (copyini.exe vs
>cpyini.exe), these files seem identical (date, time, size, and look and
>feel). How can one be easier than the other? One less letter to type in
>the filename? :-)

While we're on the subject of the massively growing INI file, and
after apparently ruling out DeskPic as the culprit, is there anyone
NOT using 4OS2 who suffers from the problem?  (In other words, shall
4OS2 be nominated as the culprit?)

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: x27@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (T. Voelkering)
Subject: Help: HPFS Problem
Organization: University of Heidelberg (Germany)
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 17:47:23 GMT

Hello there

I have a big problem on my HPFS bot partition. I think it happened in the 
moment when my Adaptec 1542B died. I got a new one but now on 
"CHKDSK D: /f:3" I get the following messasge as often as I do the CHKDSK:

	chkdsk d: /f:3
	the type of file system for the disk is HPFS.
	The HPFS file system program has been started.
	CHKDSK found and corrected a minor file system error.
	CHKDSK corrected an allocation error for the file \OS2\os2.ini.
	CHKDSK is searching disk space that is not allocated.
	CHKDSK has searched 100% of the disk.
	
	140272 kilobytes total disk space.
	   227 kilobytes in 192 directories.
	131825 k         in 2401 user files.
	     1 kilobyte in bad blocks.
	   570 k in ea's
	  3431 k res. for sys use
	  4218 k available

So it look, as if the error has been corrected. But if I try to boot or
try to copy the OS2.INI to an other name I get:

	The system detected an internal processing 
	error at location ##0f00:131e - 002:131e
	65535, 9051
	CPS: Extend not found.			<<- WHATS that ????
	048600b4
	Internal revision 6.466, 92/10/15	

The only thing I can do is to rename the OS2.INI. But if I try to make a
new one (MAKEINI OS2.INI OS2_20.RC) and reboot all I get is a gray screen and 
a mouse pointer :-(

So: What can I do?  I could make backup to the network and do a 
reinstall and restore. But dont like that.

Why is the bad block not handeled by the SCSI-drive? It should use one
of its sparse blocks if an error occures.

Any Ideas?
Thanx in advance

Thomas


==========================================================================
	Thomas Voelkering	email:	x27@indigo0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
	Unirechenzentrum                +---------------+
	Im Neuenheimer Feld 293		|  (OS/2)      .|
	6900 Heidelberg                 |--.---~  .--.(O|
	Germany                         |S/2).--.(OS/2)~|
                                        |--~(OS/2)~--~  |
                                        |    ~--~       |
                                        +---------------+
==========================================================================



-- 


==========================================================================
	Thomas Voelkering	email:	x27@indigo0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
From: cj00+@andrew.cmu.edu (Carl B Jabido)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Deleting HPFS partitions using DOS tools
Date: 16 Nov 92 10:36:04 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.gf20MoS00WBNI4ualH
Organization: Sophomore, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Excerpts from netnews.comp.os.os2.misc: 16-Nov-92 Deleting HPFS
partitions us.. by George Jetson@quads.uchi 
> I can understand (DOS) FDISK being weird about it, but what I do not
> understand is why EDPART can't do the trick.  And, in particular, why
> EDPART returns with a "Controller error".  What *does* OS/2 *do* to the
> disk and/or controller, to make it inaccessible to DOS tools?

Well, sorry if this doesn't answer anything, but 386BSD's disk
partitioning stuff can erase HPFS partitions.  One note though, OS/2
fdisk can't seem to erase 386BSD's partitions!  I used OS/2's fdisk,
changed all the partitions, saved, etc, rebooted, and it booted under
BSD!  OS/2's fdisk didn't even destroy any data on the drive.
Maybe as you go up in OS's (Dos-> OS/2 -> Unix) the partitioning of the
hard drive gets more and more complex so as to render the older
partitioning software useless.
But then again, maybe not.  Just a thought.

Carl Jabido
From: Bertram.Moshier@f115.n282.z1.tdkt.kksys.com (Bertram Moshier)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: How do I unfragment my HD
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:14:11 GMT

Yes, you can defrag your FAT disk after booting DOS natively.

BTW, one of the advantages of HPFS is it defrags itself.  While it
doesn't defrag files, it works hard at keeping its bands compressed.

BTW, the GammaTech utilities provide HPFS file defrag.

Bert Moshier


 * Origin: (1:282/115)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Seamless WIN-OS2 with ET4000
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:59:44 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.175637.6014@fzi.de> auhl@fzi.de writes:
>Although probably 1000 times asked but not found in any FAQ...
>Are there seamless WIN-OS2 drivers for ET4000 in 800x600x256 or a similar
>resolution? Where can I get them and how do I install?
>For the case ther are none, I'd like to know how to use the windows drivers
>coming with my card. Just putting them in the WIN-OS2/SYSTEM directory
>does not suffice, since names are wrong. Do I have to change the
>SYSTEM.INI and if so, how?

On the Service Pak.  Wait for the national language version of the
Service Pak to appear in your country (if you aren't using the U.S.
English version of OS/2 2.0).

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: 256 colors in background???
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:14:42 GMT

In article <Bxs1yy.H5H@ucunix.san.uc.edu> balesej@ucunix.san.uc.edu (Eric J Bales) writes:
>I'm using the new Tseng 256 color drivers (1024x768), and can't get the
>background to display in 256 colors.  Is there something specia that I
>must do?  I've also noticed that Windows programs which play with the
>palette mess things up in the background, even when those programs aren't
>in the foreground or running anymore.  Thanks for any help...

Try the "BGA" screen backgrounds, available via anonymous ftp from
ftp-os2.nmsu.edu.  If those work, you've got 256 colors.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
From: rider@geloser.login.qc.ca (Serge Ayotte)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Setting notebook not opening....
Date: 22 Nov 92 02:25:30 GMT
Organization: Gentleman Loser System, Montreal/Qc/Cdn

Hiya folks!!

Been having a problem today.

On certain of the directories objects in the tree of a drive (D drive,
all FAT) i can't get the settings notebook to open. It shows in the
windows list (and I have to close it from there) but I don't see it at
all.
I've run chekdisk earlier, it reported a bad EA and corrrected it and
still got the problem.

Anyone as any idea of what I could do??

Thanks in advance!

.sig under construction... Might be long because lack of idea?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Serge Ayotte                              rider@geloser.login.qc.ca |
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: pkedrosk@student.business.uwo.ca (Paul S. Kedrosky)
Subject: Bug Found in SVGA.EXE
Organization: University of Western Ontario
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 03:25:11 GMT

Be aware that there is a bug in the SVGA.EXE program supplied with the
SP (and maybe with the orginal disks too). This has been verified by a
number of users. The problem is that the SVGA program does not
correctly identify certain video cards (notably Diamond Speed Star
Plus ET4000 based cards). The work-around is to boot up under real DOS
and run SVGA there. The PMI file thus created will be correct and
should be used in place of the one created by SVGA.EXE when run under
full screen OS/2 DOS sessions.

Paul

























 __________________________________________________________________________
  Paul S. Kedrosky               || "A screaming comes across the sky. 
  pkedrosk@business.uwo.ca       ||  It has happened before, but there is
  University of Western Ontario  ||  nothing to compare it to now."
  London ON CANADA N6A 3K7       ||  
  (519) 679-2111 x5174           ||  
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: mlevis@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Mike Levis) (OS/2)
Subject: Re: Paradise 800x600 generic drivers
Keywords: paradise drivers
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 03:10:51 GMT

In article <1ec2c9INNc57@crcnis1.unl.edu> price@helios.unl.edu (Chad  Price) writes:
>I seem to recall seeing in the last few days serveral mentions to a set of
>generic Paradise chipset drivers to be found on Hobbes. I just spend 10-15
>minutes looking, downloaded the 2.0 00Index file and searched it, and I can
>find no vga800...zip file which proclains itself to be Paradise drivers. 
>
>Has this been removed or withdrawn, or am I looking under the wrong topic or
>what?? 

site:  ftp-os2.nmsu.edu

dir:   /pub/uploads

file:  vga800-1.zip

The 00Index does not list new uploads that have not been processed yet.

-- 
==== Mike Levis   mlevis@ringer.cs.utsa.edu ====
::   ftp ftp-os2.nmsu.edu (128.123.35.151)    ::  .--.
::   for OS/2 software & information.  Get    :: (OS/2)
:::: the OS/2 FAQL in dir /pub/os2/all/faq :::::  ~--~
From: jst50986@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jack S. Tan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Any Gateway2000 users out there?
Date: 16 Nov 92 21:04:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.BxtuK5.AHD
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

mullins@convex.com (Don Mullins) writes:

>  I just ordered a new machine from Gateway2000, and as my luck would have
>  it, the very next day I heard a horror story about installing OS/2 on a
>  Gateway machine.
>
>  The machine I ordered is:
>   Model 4DX-33V
>   8MB RAM, 64K Cache
>   Adaptec 1542A SCSI, with a 200MB HD
>   ATI Ultra Pro VESA Local bus, with 1MB VRAM
>  
>  Is anyone else out there running OS/2 on a machine from Gateway's current
>  (apparently new) line of machines?  Is it working O.K?
>
Although this isn't one of the newest machines (about 10 months old), this
Gateway 486/33C is running fine.  8MB RAM, 200MB HD, Tseng 4000 video.
Installation went smoothly - both the GA and CSD.  Same with the machine next
to me.  You probably (hopefully!) won't have any problems.

-- 

Jack Tan                                     Sattinger's Law:
jahk@uiuc.edu                       It works better if you plug it in.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: greve@rs1.thch.uni-bonn.de (Thomas Greve)
Subject: Re: OS/2 Full Screen Problem
Organization: University of Bonn, phys. Chemistry
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:09:51 GMT

In article <Gary.Woodman.849.721889824@anu.edu.au> Gary.Woodman@anu.edu.au (Gary Woodman) writes:
>In article <1992Nov11.195255.9526@bilver.uucp> dandrews@bilver.uucp (Dave Andrews) writes:
>>[...]
>>I'll take any suggestions, too.
>[...]
>and I'm still not happy. I would be extremely annoyed if I needed FS OS/2 
>for anything... still waiting for a substitute Trident card to try a 
>hardware solution.
This is more a workaround than a solution, but try:

Opening OS/2 cmd full screen -> lost sync. (This is probably due to the wrong
oscillator frequency used -- maybe i'll be able to post a svgadata.pmi patch
soon...)

mode 132,44 (or 25) -> sync'ed screen in the appropriate mode
mode 80,25 (or 30) -> we are fine.

BTW: can one select to use another font than 8x8 in 132xNN mode? I have patched 
my VGA BIOS to do this under DOS and DOS boxes, but under OS/2?
-- 
				- Thomas

   greve@rs1.thch.uni-bonn.de
   unt145@dbnrhrz1
From: marten@feki.toppoint.de (Marten Feldtmann)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Price level of OS/2 2.0 in Germany
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 92 11:18:13 GMT
Organization: Private OS/2 System

 The price of OS/2 2.0 in Germany is (at last!) falling down quite a
bit. Though the official price is still more than 400 .- DM ($250), it's
possible to get the software out on the street for about 250.- DM
($156), sometimes even less -- that's the way it should go....

 But where are the applications ... I've seen an ad for deScribe for
about 1700.- DM ($1060)? Up to this time the following rule is still
valid: buy window software and use it under OS/2 ....

 MF

--
Marten Feldtmann,     Kieler Str. 29,       2300 Kiel 14,    Germany
E-Mail: marten@tpki.toppoint.de, FAX possible
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Trivial problem concerning altered text characters
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 01:50:54 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.070248.11652@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> mlevis@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Mike Levis) (OS/2) writes:
>I love the skinny SP font.  But ever since I installed the vga800-1
>SVGA driver, I have the fat GA font back.  Does anyone know how I can
>get back the skinny SP font?

Sorry -- I don't think you can.  There's some sort of interaction
between driver and system which determines the screen typefaces.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Organisation: ECP-Paris France
Date: Monday, 16 Nov 1992 18:54:32 EDT
From: <BARON@FRECP12.BITNET>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: TRAP 0002
Distribution: usa

I had exactly the same problem when I added 4Mb.  The only difference between
the old and the new was their speed (70 and 80).  I changed the 80 to 70, and
it worked.

                                         Sebastien Baron.
From: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca (ochealth)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Growing os2sys.ini
Date: 23 Nov 1992 00:06:47 GMT
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca

In article <1992Nov22.213440.8703@abo.fi> CBURMAN@FINABO.ABO.FI (Chris Burman) writes:
:In <8f3y5Ia00iUxQ2dlwD@andrew.cmu.edu> cj00+@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
:
:> Well, I've been hit by this.  I don't know why it's growing though.  Two
:> days ago, it was at small, and very constant 450k.  At that point, I was
:> using 1024x768x256 Trident drivers, and therefore, no seamless windows. 
:> So, just to try out Seamless, I went to the 800x600x16 seamless Trident
:> Drivers.  I started playing with seamless by running Word for Windows
:> 2.0, Excel 3.0, and Afterdark 1.0.  Now, in two days, my os2sys.ini has
:> grown to more than 2 megs!  Can Seamless be what's causing the problems?
:>  That partition is now down to 6,653 bytes free!
:> I know that I can just use copyini.exe to shrink it, but I don't want to
:> do that every two days of use!  Should I stop using seamless?
:
:No, it's not the seamless drivers. I'm using the non-seamless Trident 
:800x600x256 drivers, and my ini file grows like the budget deficit. (I 
:shrank it with one of the inicopiers yesterday, but I'm at 950k already...)
:
:Trident? You're using Trident drivers? Anybody else with Trident 800x600 
:drivers and growing ini files out there? 

I have the dreaded growing os2sys.ini problem. I was using the Trident drivers
for a while, then back to standard VGA, and now back to Trident 800x600x16 
seamless. All had the sys.ini bulge, so I don't know if the drivers are to 
blame.

:
:> Thanks a lot.
:> Carl Jabido
:> cj00@cmu.edu


-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
jpm: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca         
                            Happily using OS/2 2.0 because MS Windows isNT ___
                                                      Insert VapourFeature ^^^
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: DSP Files?
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 03:21:22 GMT

In article <722484018.AA00000@psybbs.uucp>, Richard.Lee@p463.f1.n3641.z1.fidonet.org (Richard Lee) writes:
> I'm trying to install the Beta Trident drivers with 8514 resources. 
> I keep getting the complaint that no "*.DSP" files are in the source 
> directory. I can't seem to find any references to "DSP" files.

Is "DSP" what the OS/2 install is seeking?  I just installed the trident
drivers according to the docs in trid_drv.zip (or something like that). I did
not use OS/2 to install. 8514 worked fine (in my limited testing--eventually
decided to use 800x600 instead). There are a number of font choices which
did not work correctly. 

-- 
--Darrel Hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Organization: Senior, Social & Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 20:06:14 -0500 
From: Jeffrey Michael Gerber <jg3s+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: OS/2, PCTCP, and WP51

I am having the strangest problems with OS/2 2.0, WordPerfect, and PCTCP
(from FTP Software).
 
First, if I leave PCTCP (in a VDM) idle for a long amount of time (it
varies), it will forget that the TR is attached and start to have
problems.  For example, EzMail and TN cannot find the machine to connect
to (even if I specify the full name).  I suspect that maybe the TR is
getting overheated or something.
 
Second, and the bigger problem, is that I cannot run both PCTCP and
WordPerfect at the same time under OS/2 2.0.  If I have PCTCP running in
a VDM in the background and I start WordPerfect 5.1 in the foreground,
it'll all work just fine for a few minutes.  Then, I get the following:
 
    PCTCP VDM
 
    SYS 2237: DosKrnl:
 
    A NPX instruction was attempted, but no NPX is present
 
    Explanation: You have an application attemptin to use the
                    numeric coprocessor, but no coprocessor
                    is present on this system.
 
Then, PCTCP quits.  C'mon, PCTCP shouldn't be using the FPU/NPX.
 
By the way, this is with the new "golden" CSD (it used to work before).
 
Thanks, Jeff.

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc