HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Original_To:  BITNET%"POLITICS@OHSTVMA.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 14:09:00 EST
From:         linda <SABOE@VUVAXCOM.BITNET>
Subject: Re: hilary or carl? tough choice!

no, i don't think the current laws are working all that well. not when children
are being killed and the excuse is that social service offices are understaffed.
but, i'm also not sure how you would word something like hillary's proposing to
ensure that frivilous suits don't clog up the works.

i truly believe that the law does very little to protect the rights of children.
i don't like the idea that parents (or legislators) can force a person, no
matter what the age or gender, to violate the integrity of their body. such as
the two examples of forcing abortion or carrying a baby to term.
i would call it on the frivolous side to force or deny braces or nose job, and
wouldn't want to see this type of thing brought to court.

what of the kids whose parents deny medical treatment or blood transfusions for
their children because of religious reasons? what if this kid is 16 or 17 and
wants her appendix removed so that she can live? she's still a minor, but needs
parental approval and is being denied this approval?

what if she has leukemia and her parents deny chemotherapy because they don't
trust doctors? or are selfish and don't want to foot the bill?

i think there's a place for what hillary's talking about-probably even a need
for it, but it would have to be worded very carefully to make me comfortable.

anyone have any ideas how the most vulnerable can be protected w/out undo or
unfair interference by the state into personal affairs?

-linda
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%"politics@ohstvma.bitnet"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 20:36:00 EST
From:         MING the Destroyer <199561011@VUVAXCOM.BITNET>
Subject:      suggestions for the future humor czar

i would like to take this opportunity to recommend
that whichever party gains control of the sorta-beigey colored
house should appoint Robert Sprgmoss as humor czar.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: POLITICS@OHSTVMA.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"POLITICS@OHSTVMA.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: CORJB
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 15:35:00 -0500
From:         Jason Briggs Cormier <CORJB@RHODES.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Is Quayle pro-choice?

andy says:

>To balance that out, if I'm reading the constitution correctly, I'd
>love to be Vice President.  Sure, you don't get a vote in the senate
>unless it is divided, but you do get to be President of the Senate
>whenever you decide to show up.  I'd be there every day; they'd
>have to send someone else to funerals.

This is a very good point, one which I've often considered.  Why
doesn't the Vice President as presiding officer of the Senate
do more in the legislative process?

I do have  decent understanding of how the Senate works and that
the majority and minority leaders do a lot of the controlling, but
why doesn't the VP have more?

-j.b.
From: HUMPHRY@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Subject: re: ... tough choice
Date: 25 Jul 1992 20:22:06 GMT
Organization: Rice University

In article <POLITICS%92072503280149@OHSTVMA.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
Kerry Stephenson <KSTE@PURCCVM.BITNET> writes:
 
>
>PLH:
>
>You state that  outlawing abortion didn't work prior to 1973.  Please
>elaborate.
>                   --Missy Justice
 
Well, it seems I remember quite a few abortions taking place prior
to 1973 in states where it was definitely against the law -- which
would seem to indicate that what laws there were weren't having much
of an effect.  What makes you think things would be different this
time?
 
--PLH (a memory is a useful thing at times)
 
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Acknowledge-To: <BRIDEC92@IRLEARN.UCD.IE>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 16:53:05 GMT
From:         james p mcbride <BRIDEC92@IRLEARN.UCD.IE>
Subject:      Re: Wichita (AP)
              22 Jul 1992 11:30:09 -0400 from <SPRG0002@TULSAJC>

On Wed, 22 Jul 1992 11:30:09 -0400 Robert sprg0002@tulsajc.bitnet said:
>
> A state judge freed an abortion clinic protester, agreeing with her
> that life begins with conception.  "She was trying to prevent a
> greater harm".
> ----------
> Mark this down as a proud day for justice.  Congratulations to Sedgwick
> County District Judge Paul W. Clark!

As my first and last word on this particular topic, if you have any intention
of visiting Ireland to campaign on the subject during our forthcoming
constitutional referendum, remind me not to invite you for a cup of tea/coffee
in my office.

> ---Robert

james p mc bride
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Sat, 25 Jul 1992 19:37:42 EST
From:         Kerry Stephenson <KSTE@PURCCVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: the ridiculous state department
              25 Jul 1992 20:15:00 EST from <199561011@VUVAXCOM>

brni:

(Glad to see you up again :-) ).  Yeah, I agree with all that.  I just
think it's a bit more ridiculous than usual to have the state guy say
"I have no statement," wait for somebody to ask and then essentially
say, "Oh, THAT official statement!  Sure, I have that right here!"

Sigh.  It just seemed like a ridiculous charade, which both the state
guy and the media guy seemed perfectly happy to play.

                                                     --MJ
From: gpn0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (GARY PHILIP NEWHART)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Subject: Re: Is Quayle pro-choice?
Date: 30 Jul 92 18:45:26 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1992Jul30.100036.24035@maths.tcd.ie>, pmoloney@maths.tcd.ie (Paul Mo
loney) writes:
>
>So I take it from the sudden dearth of postings in this thread that we've all
>accepted that Quayle _is_ pro-choice?
>
>Good.
>
>P.
>--
>moorcockheathersiainbankshamandcornpizzapjorourkebluesbrothersspikeleepratchett
>clive P a u l  M o l o n e y "Lines of light ranged in the nonspace of the  rem
>james Trinity College,Dublin PMOLONEY%MATHS.TCD.IE@PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU mind." vr
>brownbladerunnerorsonscottcardprincewatchmenkatebushbatmanthekillingjoketolkien
It would appear that Quale is pro-choice, but that his lovely wife Marilyn
won't let him be. Who is pulling his strings anyway?>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 16:14:11 -0400
From:         "Robert sprg0002@tulsajc.bitnet" <SPRG0002@TULSAJC.BITNET>
Subject:      re: ... tough choice

 >anyone have any ideas how the most vulnerable can be protected

 Yes. OUTLAW ABORTION.

 >w/out undo or unfair interference by the state into personal affairs?
 >Linda

 No.

 ---Robert

 "Before I formed thee in the womb I knew thee; amd before
 thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee."
                                --- Jer. 1:5
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (6.4 2/14/89)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 14:20:47 EDT
From:         BAFEI@CONNCOLL.BITNET
Subject:      Another great quote

>From TFTD-L:

>
>                       Why not move the political conventions to
>                       one of the winter months so all that hot air
>                       won't go to waste?
>
>                                                 -Anon
>

Regards,

Brett

--
   _________________________________________________________________________
   | Brett A. Feinstein                       |   Convention Coordinator   |
   | BITNET: bafei@conncoll.BITNET            |    MUNSTER FOR CONGRESS    |
   | internet: bafei@mvax.cc.conncoll.edu     | Second Congressional Dist. |
   | Voice phone: 203-439-4021                |                            |
   | snail mail: Box 3337 Connecticut College |       Please insert        |
   |             270 Mohegan Avenue           |        slogan here         |
   |             New London, CT, USA 06320    |                            |
   | Listowner: GOP-L, ELECT-L                |  Vote REPUBLICAN in Nov.   |
   -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.xerox-l
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 16:36:35 EDT
From:         John Spadaro <JOHNS@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Running a 4050 from VM

We are currently running 2 4050's attached to VM HPO5.  We have CP mods
which insert DJDE's among other things.  The mods have been running flawlessly
for many years, and as such I know very little about how these printers
really work with VM.  I believe the mods originated at MIT.
Now we are preparing to upgrade to VM/ESA 1.1.

My questions.  Does anyone have similar mods that have already been ported
to ESA (or XA?).  Is this how other shops connect their XEROX printers
to VM?  Is there a better way?

Any and all pointers appreciated
John Spadaro  -- Brown University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Networking & Computing Systems, Rice University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Mon, 27 Jul 1992 10:22:28 CDT
From:         "Richard A. Schafer" <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Function key description lines
X-To:         RiceMail discussion list <MAILBOOK@ricevm1.rice.edu>

On Mon, 27 Jul 1992 08:10:17 LCL Bob Jones said:
>Thanks for this function and for making it an option.  On our campus
>we must offer (or provide alternative compensating) services to support
>persons with disabilities (Americans with Disabilities Act).  Any
>GUI, including CMS windows, blows screen readers away.  It was our
>previous assumption that we would have to support both RiceMail 92 AND
>RiceMail 91.  If this feature works, we'll be able to migrate the product
>without looking back!  Thanks!

I'm curious about this response, Bob.  Wouldn't you be better off with
pure linemode (i.e., specifying the NOSCREEN option) than this?  I admit
I know nothing about the screen readers and why windows cause problems
with them, but I would have guessed that the same might be true of any
program which tried to manipulate the full screen, such as normal
XEDIT itself.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 11:48:55 -0400
From:         "John M. Wobus" <jmwobus@MAILBOX.SYR.EDU>
Subject:      BURST XEDIT

I have received a few requests for the BURST XEDIT Rexx program.  It is
available by anonymous ftp from syr.edu under the path
software/cms/burst.xedit

Warning: I am not a RiceMail user and have no idea how well it works
with newer versions of RiceMail.

John Wobus
Syracuse University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Institut fuer Medizinische Computerwissenschaften
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:31:19 CDT
From:         Christian.J.Reichetzeder@AWIIMC12.IMC.UNIVIE.AC.AT
Subject:      Re: Compiling MAILB00K XEDIT

On Tue, 28 Jul 92 08:11:23 EDT Doug Cutler said:
>   No it woun't compile in 16M, don't blame Richard, complain to IBM!!
It works balanced - what you save  afterwards you have to spend at compilation
time ;-).
Christian
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Portland Community College
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 13:18:42 PDT
From:         "Russell N. Hathhorn, VM Systems Support" <SYSMAINT@PCCVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Making MAIL92 look like MAIL91
              24 Jul 1992 15:00:15 CDT from <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>

Richard has gone to a lot of work to provide this 'retrograde' macro.

I too had complaints/requests for pre-92 RICEMAIL

My solution - I have a 'interface' menu exec that consolidates all mail
functions.  In that exec I allow the user to select the 'style'
(old / new version) that he prefers.  The exec then sets GLOBALV variables
and re-ipls his machine.  From then on he will be using 'his choice' of mail
processor. (The default is 92.xxx)

Thank you Richard, but this problem should probably have been solved
at the individual node level.

+---------------------------------------------+-------------------------------+
|   Russell N. Hathhorn                       |  Bitnet: SYSMAINT@PCCVM       |
|   VM Systems Programmer/Analyst             |  Compu$erve: 76636,1036       |
|   Portland Community College                |  Voice: (503) 244-6111 x 4705 |
|   12000 S. W. 49th Avenue                   |  Fax:   (503) 324-7010        |
|   Portland, Oregon  97219-0990              |  "     Just say NO to OCO   " |
+---------------------------------------------+-------------------------------+
| "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms  |
|  is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."|
|   -- Thomas Jefferson                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 15:51:06 EDT
From:         Larry.H.Bradley@NRC.CA
Subject:      Re: Return-Receipt-To?

Our Network Courier (aka MS Mail) system also generates
Return-Receipt-To: headers ... it would be nice if RiceMail both
generated and responded to these headers (92.xx release, Richard?)


*------------------------------------+----------------------*
|Larry Bradley                       |    LARRY@VM.NRC.CA   |
|Communications Manager              | Larry.Bradley@NRC.CA |
|National Research Council of Canada |    LARRY@NRCVM01     |
|Networks Branch                     |                      |
|M60, Montreal Road                  | (613)993-0240        |
|Ottawa, Canada  K1A 0R6             | FAX:(613) 954-2561   |
*------------------------------------+----------------------*
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Networking & Computing Systems, Rice University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 21 Jul 1992 16:03:14 CDT
From:         "Richard A. Schafer" <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: RICEMAIL ... shareware, freeware, what?
X-To:         RiceMail discussion list <MAILBOOK@ricevm1.rice.edu>
              21 Jul 1992 14:43:27 EDT from <brennan@HAL.HAHNEMANN.EDU>

Since you ask: (Making it clear that this is not an advertisement. :-)

I'm willing to accept money from almost anyone who wants to pay me
for RiceMail, if that makes him or her feel happy.  :-)  (It certainly
helps *me* feel happy!)

That said, the current situation is

1. The package is available for free to BITNET (& EARN, etc.) members
2. The package is available for free to educational and govermental
   institutions.
3. The package is available for $1,000/major release to anyone else.
4. The package is copyrighted software, with the full rights owned by
   me.  Redistribution of the software is not allowed without express
   permission.

I support the package on a best-effort basis on my own time, regardless of
whether or not there was a fee charged for the package.

I'm available on a negotiated fee basis for consulting, training, etc.
on a limited basis.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 21 Jul 1992 18:11:03 CDT
From:         George Yanos <U08208@UICVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Threading items in notebook (menues)
              21 Jul 1992 17:19:49 EDT from <ophof@SERVER.UWINDSOR.CA>

Something simpler than the threading of related notes, I've often
wished for the ability to add a few lines of comment to a note
while it is in a notebook, and have those comments carried along
with the note from then on.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Acknowledge-To: <SYKLB@NASAGISS>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 10:43:04 EDT
From:         Ken Bell <SYKLB@NASAGISS.BITNET>
Subject:      Another problem with disconnect SVM and MAIL 920103

I feel like I'm always complaining!  I really like the new MAIL/MAILBOOK
it's just that we depend on it for so much, that when a bug surfaces,
well, y'know ...

Anyhow, this happened two nights (why only nights?) in a row.
The spooled console from our disconnected SVM that sits and receives
mail is included below.  Does this look familiar to anyone?  Thanks.. Ken

-----------------------
--- Console follows ---
-----------------------
* New mail from <XMAILER@BITNIC.BITNET>
Thursday 30 Jul 1992 at 04:51:36 .......Reader file detected.......
We have at least one CLASS M reader file
*
DMSXSU584I TOF:
Please give your installation's support person the following information.
An internal logic error in MAIL/MAILBOOK has been encountered:
Unable to create CMS Vscreen, rc=88
The error occurred at line 833
Copyright 1992 by Richard A. Schafer. All Rights Reserved.
    76 +++                            Signal Value(Translate(cmd))
   718 +++                           Call YCall
   720 +++                        Call,Finish 32
   724 +++                       Call Flush
  1039 +++                      Call BuildWindow,sizel sizec,'2 2',position,
                                                 color 'HIGH',help
   685 +++                     Call MessagePopUp '10 20','1 42','INFO'
   379 +++                Call Terminate
    73 +++            Call,XCall operands
    46 +++       Call Command
       +++       "TRACEBACK"
DMSREX463E Error 16 running MAILB00K XEDIT, line 76: Label not found
*
Thursday 30 Jul 1992 at 04:52:37 .......Reader file detected.......
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 29 Jul 1992 08:22:45 CDT
From:         Lawrence H Gindler <LGINDLER@TRINITY.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Forward with Windows Option no
              28 Jul 1992 22:40:41 CDT from <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>

Richards overnight fix for my Forwarding problem works.

Now my boss, who originally found the problem, wants to know why
we get overnight service on "free" software, but when we pay
$1000's to vendors, fixes take weeks.  I explained, of course, that
Richard is just a better kind of vendor :-)

Thanks from all of us -- larry


=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Lawrence H. Gindler
Assistant Director for User Services            telephony: (512)736-7401
Trinity University Computing Center         after-11/1/92: (210)736-7401
715 Stadium Drive Box 50
San Antonio Tx, 78212               E-Mail: LGindler@Trinity.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: University at Albany Computing Services
X-Acknowledge-To: <BEC@ALBANY>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 00:40:32 EDT
From:         Ben Chi <BEC@ALBANY.BITNET>
Subject:      Compiling MAILB00K XEDIT

MAIL INSTALL says ". . . I strongly encourage compiling at least the
MAILB00K XEDIT file to achieve the best results possible. . ."

So I did.  The result:

rexxc mailb00k xedit c (ce (mailb00k xedit a) nopr c
 ERROR STATISTICS
 TOTAL MESSAGES   INFORMATIONAL   WARNING   ERROR   SEVERE   TERMINATING
             11               0        10       0        0             1
 +++EAGPOP0054T Virtual storage exhausted
Ready(00016); T=354.66/357.07 00:29:37

cp q v stor
STORAGE = 0016M

This certainly would seem to be enough storage for the compilation.  Anybody
have any suggestions?
                                             /b
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Networking & Computing Systems, Rice University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 22:40:41 CDT
From:         "Richard A. Schafer" <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Forward with Windows Option no
X-To:         RiceMail discussion list <MAILBOOK@ricevm1.rice.edu>
              28 Jul 1992 15:44:45 CDT from <LGINDLER@TRINITY.EDU>

On Tue, 28 Jul 1992 15:44:45 CDT Lawrence H Gindler said:
>When the new option CMS Windows is set to NO, and the forward command
>is issued with no person to forward to, the user is promped with
>a Forward To: (not in a window as expected).  When a name is entered
>at this prompt, the error occurs

It's a bug.  I've sent a fixed copy of the code to Larry, and will send it
to anyone else who requests it.

My apologies, and thanks for reporting the problem.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 21 Jul 1992 13:45:56 EST
From:         "Scott (nmi) Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
X-To:         RiceMail discussion list <MAILBOOK@ricevm1.rice.edu>
              21 Jul 1992 10:37:36 EST from <MAINT%IND.BITNET@ricevm1.rice.edu>

On Tue, 21 Jul 1992 10:37:36 EST Brian Pearson said:
>I've seen several references to LNAME recently...
>Where can I find out more about it?

BYUSTUFF FILELIST at BYU has the LNAME PACKAGE. send the following
command to LISTSERV@BYU

GET LNAME PACKAGE BYUSTUFF

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 17:14:39 EDT
From:         "Nick Gimbrone (WIRDI)" <NJG@CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Threading items in notebook (menues)
              21 Jul 1992 17:19:49 EDT from <ophof@SERVER.UWINDSOR.CA>

On Tue, 21 Jul 1992 17:19:49 EDT Scott Ophof said:
>Does anyone have anything to process the index file so that sorting
>it by "THREAD" would sequence the items by topic?  Not subject or
>date, but using the "In-Reply-To:" data.
>Maybe even a display like in the Netnews newsreader called "trn"?
>(probably on a separate screen?)
>Something like the following diagram to indicate how the items are
>linked with respect to offshoots, derivatives, etc.?
>   (.)-(p)-(.)-(.)               (.)  An item
>    |   |                        (H)  "Here" (reading that item
>    |  (H)-(.)-(.)               (p)  Item previously read
>    |
>   (.)-(.)                       Top-left = start-of-thread
I like the idea... a lot... I tend to use sorts by date and selection
by subject for this... but it is far from perfect. I'm not sure how
well this would work "in the real world", but it might be worth a shot...
Go for it Scott, and let us know how it works! ;-) -njg
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: San Jose State University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:15:34 PDT
From:         John Sroka <SROKA@SJSUVM1.SJSU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Checking it Out

On Mon, 27 Jul 1992 23:50:15 EDT Stan Horwitz said:
>On Mon, 27 Jul 92 19:05:17 EDT Clint Walker said:
>>Greetings,
>>     I have signed onto this list without having any idea of its purpose.
>>If this is a general Rice discussion list, that is what I was looking for -
>>if not, would someone let me know and I will sign off.
>
>You're in the right place! This is a Ricemail discussion list.
>

Though it sounds like Clint is looking for a list dealing with Rice
University in general.  RICEMAIL centers around the MAIL package written
by Richard Schafer at Rice University.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 21 Jul 1992 10:37:36 EST
From:         Brian Pearson <MAINT@IND.BITNET>

I've seen several references to LNAME recently...
Where can I find out more about it?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Mon, 27 Jul 1992 13:09:18 PST
From:         John Wical <UNCJWI@LLUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: set send unprotected

On Mon, 27 Jul 92 12:30:46 PST I said:
>>Hope this clears up any confusion.
>
>   Yes, I understand a lot more now.  Unfortunately, I'm still not sure how
>to accomplish my objective of having my exec set PSEND to NO.

   Ahhh, I figured it out.
   I didn't have the correct syntax for changing the globalv in my exec.
I change PSEND to NO before invoking MAIL, then back to YES afterwards.

   Thanks for all your help, Richard!

John
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU