HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper)
Subject: K e n makes a lousy philosopher
Followup-To: K e n's really annoying drivel
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 13:47:17 GMT

	In an earlier post, K e n wrote:

The answer is not life. Life does not end continuously. It is eternal.
The situation of death is merely a transformation. Your question uses
the phrase "but ends continuously", meaning that something actually
ends.
Eternal things, by definition, do not end. K e n's answer is still
correct.

	Life is eternal? Tell that to me dear departed gran'da.

	And yes, K e n, you do exist only to amuse me. I thought you
knew--I'm a hedonistic solipsist.

Tep--still misinformed and lovin' it!
-- 
I'm too sexy for meiosis.
From: kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 19 Nov 92 11:24:59 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <1458@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
> 
> Oh, Christ- this wallabee-fucking strine geek is fixated on me now.
> Somebody wanna divert him for me, maybe wave a kangaroo dick at him
> or something?  I'll sneak up behind him and untie his shoes, so's
> he falls off the bottom of the planet...
>
Good lord Bill, just which country do you think I come from?
There seem to be too many Australian references in there.
If I was an Austrailian, I wouldn't have any call to flame an
American now would I?  Think about it.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
Subject: Re: Consensus stuff - the real reasoning
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:15:32 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.15 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In <_hr1slc@rpi.edu> keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
>
>i've seen no evidence to convince me that many of cj's
>allegations are anything more than the petty whines of
>a frustrated shrew.

Funny - she doesn't *look* shrewish...  :-)
--
Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bufalini@cattycorner.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 18:54:59 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.210150.2295@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
> bufalini@cattycorner.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>
>>>do you do this so ken will continue to let your give him rim jobs?
>>
>>No, I did it to correct Tilden.
>>
>
>But admit it--continued rim job WERE a factor in your decision, were'nt

No, your statement is incorrect.

>they? Or do you honestly expect us to believe you can be fair and impartial
>when it comes to K e n, with whom you are so involved?

I have no involvement with K e n.  I was just correcting Tilden, who made many
errors in a previous post.

-- 
Bruce A Bufalini <bufalini@gis.psu.edu>
"Blame is better to give than receive."  --  Neil Peart, 1980
"Take it easy -- or any way you can." -- Brian "Launch Pad" Mansberry,
                                                         among others
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Two in Hemet
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:34:17 GMT

In article <16060006@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com> tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:
>There is someplace even stupider...

lemme guess, the ward in which YOU are housed.

>Baker, California has on main road that is about a half mile long...

I see. How fascinating.


>Along this main avenue in between other small services lie:


Your mother, sleeping in the gutter after a rough night of servicing tourists
for beer money?

>15 CHINESE FUCKING RESTAURANTS ! ! !...
>
>Alfred:  So, what kind of food should we eat tonight, dear?
>	 Chinese or fucking Chinese or what?
>	 Mildred: Oh, I dont know...Chinese maybe.... 
>
>
>	  
>
you could always COOK, you worhtless asshole. 

nothing personal,
rob
From: kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: More butt-cheese than brains
Date: 23 Nov 92 17:25:52 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <1992Nov20.162749.17234@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
> 
>  clare@nynexst.com (Clare Chu) whines:
> 
> >  Including Ms. Danielle T. Wei.  She admits to me that she knew NO ENGLISH
> >  when she came here.  Now she wants to change things here...
> 
> O MY GAWD! Can you BELEIVE the nerve of this woman? Trying to come to America
> knowing NO ENGLISH at all. What a CRIMINAL. She should be locked up in
> a cell with Jeffry Dahmer.
>
Well, I haven't met an American who can speak English either, they just
drone on in American.  They can't even spell correctly.  Just watch
the next time some fuck trys to calling me an arse hole or something.
                                               ^ ^
-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: PSU
Date: 17 Nov 92 18:34:10 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton

In article <1dpg7pINNijq@morrow.stanford.edu>, EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara) writes:
> i saw a bumper sticker here at stanford yesterday.  it said 
>            Penn State and pissed at U
> whoever would have thought that someone from PSU would be capable of
> traversing the country via automobile.  perhaps mommy drove.

*whoever thought that a moron from the West Coast could type?  Oh well, if they
can get a chimp to learn sign language . . . .   At least our
state educational system isn't collapsing in upon itself like yours.  I guess
you'd have a budget, if all of you Californians weren't too busy buying
crack and shooting it out on the freeway. 

> given the fact that they were on stanford property, they probably
> were leaving after a stint of toilet-cleaning.  somebody's gotta do
> it :)

*What's that?  Your school full of West Coast PIGS was so desperate that you
had to call in a special team of educators from PSU just to teach you to clean
your own toilets!?!  Geezus, I hope for their sake that you guys at least knew
how to wipe your own asses *doubtful*!

					Troll of Pa.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar Samant)
Subject: Re: RENAME: Those against name change PLEASE READ!
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 10:02:26 GMT

(Rob Dobson) writes:
>jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca (John Henders) writes:
>>
>>	That's Chip's point, and you're doing a darn good job of it.
>
>OUCH! TOO HOT! OUCH! THEZE FLAMEZ BURN ME!@!@ OUCH!@! TOO HOT!@!@

So are your flames, Bob.

Sincerely,
From: kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Worthless
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:16:18 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b64746.student.cwru.edu


	Suitable title for Gar's post: worthless.
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: troll masturbates all over Slobson.
Date: 19 Nov 92 18:57:14 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton

In article <1992Nov17.204208.1776@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
> In article <1992Nov17.132144.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
> 
>>*I don't read anybody's stuff unless it is a reply to mine, usually.  Of
>>course, the stuff I like reading best is my own, not your digitized excrement.
>>If it weren't for your reply, I'd never even recognize your existence, Mr.
>>Nobody.
 
> Oh, troll just LOVES reading his own stuff. He is the kind of
> no-life narcissistic asshole who just LOVES to get it all for himself.

*And it is all MINE, . . . mine, Mine, MINE!  Not yours, so deal with it.
 By the way, I don't go picking through the usenet looking for things
 with your sig on them, I'd sooner read Bur's defecations.

> Well, troll, if you like your own writing so much why dont you just
> write yourself e mail instead of spewing your electronic masturbation
> worldwide.

*Listen, Rob Slobson, before you were ever a newbie here in playland with this
 scabby rabble, I was writing political satire for a subscriber list 50+ names
 long.  And when you were just breaking wind with your first indignant post, I
 was getting thrown off of channel insult on IRC because the pansy moderators
 couldn't beat me.  So, when I post, I do you the service of allowing you to
 observe my form so that you can better your own.  No thanx necessary.
 This is nothing MACfacfuck&suck Bur or any of you other losers can boast.
 All you do is post here and then tell each other how poorly you did in
 comparison to each other, pretty pointless.   

				Ta Ta for Now

				Troll  ha hahahahaha!
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
Subject: Re: The Moral Majority is Neither
Organization: QQQCLC
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 20:10:48 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.151548.2282@newstand.syr.edu> isr@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Michael S. Schechter - ISR group account) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov11.034944.22206@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Bar
>>Tell the parents of kids that have been victimized by the very sort of
>>person that likes to look at those photos your meaningless opinions.
>
>Well, it's like any other thing- it can be abused..

	Shit. Guess I need to look in on the boring, brain-dead world of
alt.flame more often. Schechter, you pus-filled sore, I didn't write the
censorious nonsense you attribute to me, it was written by a juvenile
loser who styles himself "Uncle Fester". _I_ flamed _him_ for it.

	Don't bother to apologize, I won't accept it, and it's too late
anyway, since I've put a contract out on you.

						Kayembee
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 16 Nov 92 03:57:21 GMT
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711

In article <s260TB7w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
>weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
>> In article <kmR3TB12w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
>> >weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
>> >> In article <XFFZTB6w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes
>> >> >At a guess, it beats voting for a mealy-mouthed fascist hypocrite who cla
>> >> >atheists can't be US citizens,
>> >> 	didn't say this
>> >
>> >Your denial is singularly unimpressive, as I happen to have the entire quote
>> >and a set of references to hand.
>[...]
>> 	No, I'm not feeling like a Moron. What George bush said is 'I don't 
>> know that they should be' which is NOT the same thing as stating that they
>> should not be.
>
>Quite.  He might have reconsidered later, and withdrawn the comment about
>atheists not being patriots or citizens.  But he didn't.  When questioned
>about whether he really meant it, he got the Counsel to the President to
>reply, saying that he stood by the comment and that he didn't think atheists
>should be considered as patriots or citizens.
	Maybe you should post that again. I don't remember that quote as being
quite that definite. As a matter fact I remember it as being rather vague. I
deleted it because it didn't seem relevant to your original point.
 
>
>But of course, you deleted that bit before following up, slimy weasel that
>you are.

	slimy? You're the one making unsubstantiated accusations.

>
>	[ more irrelevant nonsense deleted ]

>I'd suggest you read the whole article before flaming it.  You're not fooling
>anybody.
	I'm not trying to 'fool' anybody. I'm just pointing out the flaws in
your reasoning.

>
>>                                                   As for my other 'stupid
>> knee-jerk denials' your evidence for them is probably about as impressive
>> as this, which is to say- not very.
>
>There's no point my posting anything about the rest of your stupid knee-jerk
>denials, as you'd only delete the bits you didn't like, twist as many words
>as possible, and deny the rest.

	More nonsense. I still don't see the 'proof'.

>
>Face it, you and Bush have a lot in common.  You're both slimy and
>intellectually dishonest -- assuming, that is, that either of you can validly
>be called "intellectually" anything.  Oh, and you're both losers of course.

	More unsubstantiated accusations. About me that is. All politicians
are slimy and intellectually disonest until proven otherwise. Attacking my
intellect? What's wrong, couldn't find anything wrong with my arguments so
you attack me directly? Now 'loser' is really weak. At least your first insult
was somewhat clever.

>mathew
>[ Going to explain away my .signature? ]
	Why should I try to? It's a pretty accurate statement.
>-- 
>"Boy, they were big on crematoriums weren't they?"
> -- George Bush, during a tour of Auschwitz, 1987-09-28
>

William Everett
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: ckincy@mcs213f.cs.umr.edu (Charles Kincy)
Subject: Re: Beckett's Lost Work
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 22:33:53 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla
Keywords: Samuel Beckett, K e n, parody

In article <1e8rkuINN1op@venture.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Drool) writes:
>
>In article <Bxo44I.CsE@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>K e n is amused. You are indeed exceptional in the art of humor.
>>Thank you for giving K e n a reason for rolling around the floor
>>in laughter.
>>
>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>
>Perhapse you should look at yourself in a mirror, for this would be a true joke
>in the opinion of those who have found your ramblings to be a useless form of
>moronic dribble posted by new-comers to this net as a form of recognition, which
>is all you are truely after.

You are mhisinformed.  Khen ihs the ohne truhe Ghod!

Furthermore, you have given newbies a bad name.  Please execute
this command in your brain:  "kill -9 0".  Thank ya.  Thankyavurrymuch.

You are a waste of oxygen!  Die!  Die!  Die!

>Tilden has vomited

You should really watch where you puke.  You might ruin your mouse.

cpk
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.test,misc.test
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Subject: Re: test
Reply-To: tmurphy@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
Organization: University of Northern Indiana
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:14:39 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.205015.19242@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>,
tmurphy@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Tricia L Murphy) writes:
>
>This is just a test.  I thought I would waste space on a meaningless group.
>
Well, as long as you're here, would you like to be my friend?

Melvin M. Gladstone
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Bush? (was: Why Clinton)
Date: 16 Nov 92 20:59:36 GMT
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711

In article <eywBuB12w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes:
>
>Translation:
>
>"The point is that there was a minor flaw in something I think somebody
>posted.  Being eager to defend my pal George Bush, I seized this flaw and
	Not really my pal, but I do tend to take issue with unsubstantiated
allegations.

>proceeded to flame away randomly.
	There was nothing random about my flames. They were all pretty specific

>Everyone attacked me for some reason.
	I think it has something to with the fact that I pointed out that 
something wasn't quite what you thought. Since I pointed out that it wasn't as
bad as you first thought you all saw it as a defense and attacked it blindly.

>Why
>can't you just ignore all the nasty documented evidence which has since been
	I haven't ignored anything.
>posted, and pretend that the whole argument has been refuted by my flame?"
	It has. Deal with it.
>
>
>mathew
>-- 
>"Boy, they were big on crematoriums weren't they?"
> -- George Bush, during a tour of Auschwitz, 1987-09-28

William Everett
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: K e n--Fundie, or just idiotic?
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:34:38 GMT

In article <1equm2INNeh1@maico.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@maico.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>
>In article <1992Nov22.173219.15183@Princeton.EDU>, datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
>>	It's all so clear now. Garrett Cress has pointed out that K e n
>>suffers from terminal megalomania. In addition, K e n constantly makes
>>references to vague "information", although when pressed to provide
>>information, he waffled and called the request "irrelevant." (Thanks to
>>Lefty for pointing this out) Further, he states without proof that there
>>is an Afterlife--no specific mention of Heaven or Hell, although I
>>suspect that the so-called "misinformed" would not be eligible for his
>>version of Heaven. (Gee, K e n--wouldn't it get lonely up there all by
>>yourself?) Given these facts, and his single-minded fanaticism towards
>>conversion of the "misinformed", leads me to suspect that K e n is
>>actually a raving fundamentalist of his own narcissistic cult.
>>
>	Also, Ken seems to believe he is a philosopher of sorts.  We have
>found through my posts this is not true. Ken has provided us with no 
>valid proof that he is able to obtain a philosophical state of mind, and
>seems quite unable to answer a relatively simple philosophy question. We 
>must therefore conclude Ken Robinson is a fraud and deserves no respect
>from those who endure his meaningless drible.

Tilden, K e n answered your question and gave you the correct response.
Further, K e n has never claimed to be a philosopher. K e n only claims
to be K e n. It is you that applied the "philosopher label" to K e n.
K e n sees no reason to satisfy your philosophical requirements, for
K e n has made no such claims. K e n simply answered your query.
You seem to be quite misinformed.

K e n   R o b i n s o n 
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 00:39:43 GMT

In article <1458@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>, libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
 
> Oh, Christ- this wallabee-fucking strine geek is fixated on me now.
> Somebody wanna divert him for me, maybe wave a kangaroo dick at him
> or something?  I'll sneak up behind him and untie his shoes, so's
> he falls off the bottom of the planet...
> Bill    

Ladies and Gentleme, Bill has finally conceeded that he is a spineless prick
that does not deserve our attention. No Bill, no one is going to save you now.
No one is going to "divert" Kevin for you. Stand on your own two feet young
man... there is no place for you to hide here.

--The Phantom
From: al037@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dave Polewka)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Top ten anagrams of "Bruce Bufalini" and "Kenneth Robinson"
Date: 23 Nov 1992 04:17:48 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: al037@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dave Polewka)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, jac@doe.carleton.ca (James A. Cherry) says:

>TOP TEN ANAGRAMS OF "BRUCE BUFALINI":
> [crap deleted]

  Try:  1. Facile ruin, Bub!
        2. FUC U, BILE BRAIN!!
----------------------------
>TOP TEN ANAGRAMS OF "KENNETH (J.) ROBINSON":
> [2nd load, too]

  Try:  1. Non!  Think *beer*, son!
----------------------------

  jac@doe.carleton.ca -- anagram (@=m)
***************************************
     DAC: "Let JAC race no mo'!"
***************************************
-- 
=======================
"Endeavor to persevere"
=======================
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 15 Nov 92 12:44:48 GMT
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
> In article <RBR3TB11w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
> >There is more to flaming than stringing together meaningless insults and bad
> >language.  
> 	Doesn't have to be.
>
> >Flailing around in anger when someone ridicules your right-wing
> >political opinions isn't flaming,
> 	yes it is.

We've all heard the Monty Python argument sketch, thanks.  At least their
version was funny; yours is just sad.


mathew
-- 
"Boy, they were big on crematoriums weren't they?"
 -- George Bush, during a tour of Auschwitz, 1987-09-28
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: esp51@cas.org ()
Subject: email from moral majority idiot
Organization: Chemical Abstracts Service
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:18:26 GMT


Here's a sample of the moronical email I've been getting from his
Dennis Hogaboom:

If you were not so fucking stupid, you might know that I have no way to correct
my errors.  I do not do everything from pretyped ascii.

As far as my e-mail is concerned, you have no room to be calling me an idiot.
YOU are misinformed.  When I do not pretype my email messages, my thoughts
probably do come off as unorganized.  I am far from stupid.  I AM NOT JOKING!
I am observant.  You are blind.  If the media said that 99 out of 100 people
would were going to jump off a cliff, you probably would.  Call me Brainwashed?
I think not.  I have based all of my political views on the platforms and not
the people.  All of the candidates have their secrets.  And ALL of them lie.
That is a fact.

MORAL MAJORITY IDIOT?   There is not moral mojority in this country.  Bill Cl
(pardon me, I forgot to hit the return key!)

Bill Clinton getting elected proved that christians as well as normal people
are just plain immoral.  Where do you stand on homosexuality and abortion?

You have failed to recognize the mainstream issues.

I stand on the bible for morals.


It would help very much if you would tell me just what parts of my posts are
what you call "bullshit".  I have not told you that you are full of shit.
This kind of attitude shows me that you are loosing your foothold.  Perhaps
not!  Present just what it is you disagree with.  Spelling is another issue
not even related to this political debate.  So save that crap for later.

Dennis Hogaboom (Do you have a better idea for a sig?)


Dennis, I realize you are too much the pussy to post this drivel, so I
have taken the liberty.  Replying by email to your Jesus sucking tripe
is a waste of time.
Scott Park
Opinions are mine, I am not company spokesman.