HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pboren@rand.org (Pat Boren)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB: Thursday: 10/8/92: I couldn't see the sign...
Date: 9 Oct 92 16:44:33 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: RAND Corporation.

In article <1992Oct8.202725.19806@njitgw.njit.edu> crl0195@hertz.njit.edu (Curt R Lindmark) writes:
>During the last few minutes of today's SB, the camera was focused on
>a sign on the island Ted and Lilly were on.  Unfortunatly for me, I couldn't
>make out any of the words.  Any ideas, fellow addicts?

It said that the beach was for guests of the Lost Horizon resort.
Guess they're not on an uninhabited island afterall.

>1) McCabe was absolutly hysterical as "Elvis".  Kelly was a little confusing
>   considering that I thought she liked him, not wanted to go out with him just
>   to make his life miserable out of revenge.

I haven't laughed at SB in a long time.  Elvis was a riot.  I wanted
to hear Kelly's answer to his "Are you lonesome tonite."  Kelly, on the
other hand, came out of left field.  I'm glad Connor insisted they go
out to be seen--she deserved to be embarrassed.  CC's reaction to her
was pretty funny, too.

>2) How in the *WORLD* did BJ get into the back of the car?  MAYBE if Warren

I hated this.  It's as bad as the proverbial killer in the back of the car
popping up to hijack the car and kidnap the driver.  HOW CAN ANYONE GET
IN A CAR AND NOT NOTICE SOMEONE ON THE FLOOR OF THE BACKSEAT??!!
Sorry, I won't shout anymore.

>Other than that one problem, today's episode was great.  
>Long live SB! (oh well)

Agreed.  One more thing:

I'm getting real tired of everyone dumping on Connor for doing his
job.  Is he not supposed to make an arrest because of what Frank did?
A crime was committed.  Frank is dead and somebody did it.  That person
needs to be arrested, then it's up to the courts to decide whether to
prosecute.  End of story.  Get off his case, SBites.

Pat
-- 

	Patricia Boren
	pboren@rand.org
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria)
Subject: Re: AMC:tan:I'm back!!!
Organization: MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 22:15:26 GMT

In article <9OCT199214374367@mrl.arc.nasa.gov> holst@mrl.arc.nasa.gov (Laura Holst) writes:
Re: Nut's hair way back when she was in the hospital with a spot of
grey on the side...(?)

>I noticed her weird hair on Thursday!  I was thinking to myself, her hair
>looks just like The Bride Of Frankenstein's!

Hi Laura! I'm wondering if it is still noticeable while she is having
her forever (?) ongoing battle with the Evil Carter Jones...

Cmon NotNat! Give Carter Hell! 

CAZ
From: rpeck@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (robert william peck)
Subject: Re: OLTL: Update Tues. 10/13
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 21:10:40 GMT

In article <92288.105200KARENK@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> <KARENK@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> writes:
>Who
>should appear before him, stirring up feelings and sensations (and beautiful
>music!!) like Alex and Dr. Ruth could never do...but Renee!!!   He takes
>one look at her, and has obviously found his "Cleopatra"...More to follow,
>I'm sure!!!
>
Wasn't that beautiful music from Tchaikowsky's Piano Concerto No.1 in
B-Flat?  (I'm not *entirely* sure.)  One would think that Morty would
actually hear something from Verdi's Aida, Handel's Julio Cesare, or
even Rossini's Moses in Egypt--something set along the Nile at any
rate!!!

--Bob

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kjs@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (kelly.smith)
Subject: DOOL:  Why I like Tim
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:32:42 GMT


Okay since there's all this talk of why people don't like
Tim.  I thought I'd come to his defense (sorta).

I like Tim because:

1.  He's a supporting actor and therefore not always on.

2.  He's rather ordinary looking.  He's not a pretty boy
    and doesn't take off his clothes constantly to show
    us his chest (like Asstin).

3.  I LOVE his hair.  I like the way it hangs and how he
    puts it into a ponytail every now and then.  I also
    like the sideburns.  I think he wears them well.

4.  He has leading man potential.  His character has been
    brought in slowly and he has gained my respect both as
    as an actor and a character.

5.  He makes Scarrie tolerable.  She improves ten times when
    she's with him.

6.  His character is genuine.  He tells it like it is and doesn't
    pull any crap.

7.  You don't see women hanging all over him.  He doesn't strike
    me as the sleazy type (like Asstin).

8.  He doesn't gaze off goofily (like Asstin).

9.  He dresses nicely.

10.  He's not a goody two shoes.

I could come up with more, but I'm sure you get my point.
I guess what I am really trying to say is, he's everything
that Asstin isn't.  Comments, anyone?

		Boysenberry
From: mjmh@bashful.bu.edu (Michael J M Holmes)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Godzilla Speaks Update (c) 921009
Date: 12 Oct 92 17:42:43 GMT
Organization: Boston University Center for Remote Sensing

GREAT UPDATE!  Plus I loved the fashion critic routine!

However, is it REALLY true that Mona will be leaving the show?
That would be terrible!  She is one of the few remaining originals
from the early years!!  Then it will only be Phoebe, Erica, Joe,
and Ruth!  

I think having MEK back as Tad would be great.  I also want to
say that I think there are a lot of great past characters who
could be brought back to the show.  In the last few years, a lot
of brand-new characters have been brought on the show, some of them
with really tenuous ties to Pine Valley (in other words, I wonder
what brought them there!).

Instead of creating any brand-new characters, I'd like to see some
old ones return.  Nick has been put to pretty good use lately.  And
we don't necessarily need the same actors if that is not possible.
I mean, the show is All My CHILDREN!  There are lots of relatives
who could return to PV!!

My choices would include: Tara (for great scenes with Charlie, Ruth, Joe,
and Erica!)
Liza (to spice up Tad's return!)
Linc (Phoebe needs more family around!  She has lots of relatives, but
spends TOO much time with Brooke&company)
Cecily & Nico (no good reason except that they were so much FUN!)

I'd also like to note that I think Bianca WILL be coming back to PV
in the next year or two.  BUT please note that I think she will
be about 13 when she comes back - just in time to be a frosh at
PV high, and to give Mommie Dearest wonderful headaches about dating!!

mike holmes
mjmh@crsa.bu.edu
((Hmm, if I keep this up, maybe I need a sharp nickname or something!))
:)

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: sheri@cbnewse.cb.att.com (sherlyn.k.johnson)
Subject: Re: AMC: Jervision
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 15:21:44 GMT

In article <BvtAu6.JuF@scd.hp.com>, susanm@an.hp.com (Susan Margulies) writes:
> sherlyn.k.johnson (sheri@cbnewse.cb.att.com) wrote:
> : Then there's the Martins.  What can you say about parents that let 
> : their children go upstairs to wax their skies and never see them again.
> : Obviously, they were not too worried.
> 
> What do Joe and Ruth need with their biological children when they
> have has so many child-wannabes hanging around?  Let me name a few:
> Charlie, Dixie, Katie...  Joe and Ruth need to cut the cord on
> these folks - they are adults, for goodness sake!  If Joey or Bobbie
> Martin were still around, there wouldn't be any room for them in
> the Martin House!

That's one thing that Ruth at least excels at, treating adults like
children regardless of who they are. For example, when Erica and
Charlie were seeing/sleeping with each other.  She kept telling
Erica what she should do with Charlie so she wouldn't hurt his
feelings, and how Charile would be wrecked when she stopped seeing
him.  I realize part of this was to protect him, but sheesh, he's an
adult! Give these people a chance to take care of themselves.  Heck,
I get a little edgy when my own mother tells me how to raise my
children. Not because of anything in particular except, they are my
children and I will raise them how I see fit!
> 
Sheri J.

> Susan
> --

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 00:29:33 EDT
From: <RES133@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Y&R: Late night ramblings

Well, I'm up late and am bored so here's some things to read for your enjoyment
(enjoyment is a matter of opinion, however!)

Typical Victor speech: (said while at home in his "all black" look with his
hands in his pockets talking to himself - or maybe to Katherine because she
always seems to appear out of nowhere for these types of speeches)
    "I am the great Victor Newman, you got that?  Nikki is the mother of my
children and she is going to carry that man's child!  We have a passion like
no other as we did the other night when we made love!  I know you love  ME.
You love me, not Jack Abbott!(please note it is very important to put in the
last name so as to not get confused with, say, Jack the Ripper)-phone rings.
Victor: "Victor Newman. . . yes Connie . . . um . . tell them to hold all my
calls, ok? (smile grin) click"

Let's say Katherine shows up at this very moment when Victor's life is in utter
turmoil (WOW! what a surprise!) Katherine: "Well, Victor, I can see I have come
in the nick of time. Has Nikki told you she is pregnant and plans to stay with
Jack?  Have you asked Ashley to be your heir apparent?  From the look on your
face I can tell you are having an affair with Jill.  My God Victor!"

Meanwhile, in other parts of Genoa City . . .

Lauren, looking woeful, is looking like a sad puppy and kissing Paul.  Lynne
is typing letters because she promised to "get right on it".  Scott is putting
Scotty down for his 8 billionith nap.  Jill is strutting around in her office
staring at some kind of chart waiting for someone to come in so she can start
her scene. Cricket is now entering medical school.  Danny is saying how much
he "loves his wife".  Nina is staring at the phone.  Brandon is planning how
to blow up Ryan's car.  Ryan wants sex.  Victoria wonders about "HIV - the
virus that causes AIDS" and runs to the store to by a magazine on how satisfy
your man in bed.  Jack is grinning.  Ashley is pondering.  Olivia, Nathan, Drew
Neil, Dr. Sandall, and varios nurses are all holding hands and smiling at
Olivia and they suddenly break into song.  Miguel is planning a lighter menu.
Ester is planning on how to spend her new found millions.  Rex is being
annoying.  Brad is eying up the new secretary at work.  Hillary is being stupid
Michael's boss Cal and Molly's friend Naomi hook up in a sleazy bar in the
wrong part of town. John Silva is being a nice guy.  John Abbott is being a
nicer guy.  And finally, Sheila is laughing at them all from 5 states away.


Ok, ok, enough of that.  There's my glorious typical scene of Y&R.  Anyone
have anything to add? :)


                                      Becky at Penn State!
                                      RES133@psuvm.psu.edu
From: susanm@HP-AND.AN.HP.COM (Susan Margulies)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: AMC: Thursday Update Oops
Date: 11 Oct 92 17:38:59 GMT

Hi everybody!  I can't believe that I forgot to include the
big Thursday cliffhanger in my update!  Shows what happens
when you start pulling all-nighters at work!

Anyways, at the very end of the show, after Adam has been 
blown away by Junior's desire to have Brian as one of his
2 fathers, Adam calls his lawyer and tells him to start
the ball rolling in Adam's suit against Dix for full custody
of Junior.  Hayley walks in just in the nick of time to
over hear!  Pops is busted again, for the 2nd time in one week!
[cliffhanger!]

Susan
--
Susan E. Margulies       |  So many bad drivers,
HP Imaging Systems       |  so few hand gestures.
508-681-2153 (work)      |      o o 
susanm@hp-and.an.hp.com  |     \___/
From: ST401816@brownvm.brown.edu (Kate Monteiro)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: HF: Spoilers (was: Re: HF: My 2 cents)
Date: 15 Oct 92 22:56:45 GMT
Organization: Brown University - Providence, Rhode Island  USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: brownvm.brown.edu
News-Software: BNN via BNN_POST v1.0 beta

I can't wait to see Ruth Sloan help deliver ANne and Al's baby.
This is going to be great!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: L638615@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Subject: Re: AMC: Liza vs Jenny '92
Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 15:14:10 GMT

Well, *I* taped Overexposed (with Marcy Walker) and watched Lady Boss (with Kim
Delaney).  Therefore solving my dilemna on which one to watch.  Did you also
see Taylor Miller (ex-Nina Cortland Warner) on Overexposed.  Boy, what a goof-
ball she was!

Kelly



















Organization: Student Employment Office, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Wed,  7 Oct 1992 09:39:13 -0400 
From: Judi Mancuso <jm5p+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: GL:Van&Porter Jones?
	<mcmahon.79@nd.edu>

>Sheila answers my question regarding information in Soap Opera Magazine
that 6 years ago Vanessa divulged that she had a daughter with Porter
Jones in her teens... 
>No, this is not it. The daughter Vanessa had was Dinah who is also Ross'
>daughter. She is (or was when she left the show about 3 or 4 years ago)
>going to school in Europe. She is Harley's age.  Nice guess though. You
>show a very good soap opera mind!!
> 
>Sheila M.

Yes, I am aware of Dinah--Vanessa and Ross's daughter.  What I am asking
about is this reference to Vanessa's daughter to PORTER JONES. As I
said, I read this in Soap Opera Magazine--that 6 years ago Vanessa was
deciding whether to tell Billy about this daughter she had with PORTER
JONES. Now, was this daughter she thought she had to PORTER JONES the
same as the one she actually had to Ross (Dinah)?  I don't believe so. 
Also, I inferred that this daughter MAY be Jenna and that is why Henry
is so upset.  Does anyone know about PORTER JONES AND VANESSA'S DAUGHTER
or recall this storyline?  Judi

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: harris@drvax3.msfc.nasa.gov (Mitch Harris)
Subject: Re: AMC: Monday 10/5 update 
Organization: NASA/MSFC
Date:  7 Oct 92 05:25:10 GMT

Jennifer Allyson Turner <jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

>Palmer was never married to Ellen!!  Otherwise, I agree and have another
>name to add to the list: Cynthia (Jane Eliot, currently Tracy on GH). 
>Don't you remember when PC married her and adopted her son Andrew as
>heir to Cortlandt Electronics?  And I'm sure there was another wife in
>there somewhere.  Wasn't PC married to Chandler's sister way back in his
>Pete Cooney days?

Nahhh....he just bopped her....

......posted for Beverly H.

--
Mitch Harris                           |  New Technology Inc.
(205)-544-2846                         |  700 Boulevard South, #401
drvax3!harris@freedom.msfc.nasa.gov    |  Huntsville, AL  35802
From: IDSWB@ASUACAD.BITNET
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL:TAN: Eyebrow Power
Date: 9 Oct 92 16:29:07 GMT
Article-I.D.: ASUACAD.92283.092907IDSWB
Organization: Arizona State University

>Just wanted to let y'all know that having a talent for raising one's
>eyebrows (like Carly) came in handy this weekend.  My husband, our niece
>(who is visiting from England and has become hooked on DOOL) and I went to
>a taping of "Evening Shade" on Friday night and won an "Evening Shade"
>T-shirt because my husband could raise one eyebrow.
>        __.        |
>       /  |  __. . |
>      (__/|/(_/|_|_|__)
>         /| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>        (_/ Computer Center (CCAD), California State University, Northridge
>            18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge, CA 91330
>            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
First of all congratulations to your hubby.  Bet the t-shirt's cool.  Hmmmm...
got me wondering though .... how many t-shirts do you suppose Carly has by
now that she acquired that way?  My guess is so many that she doesn't accept
them anymore.

Happy because all she can do facially is roll her eyes so only whites are
showing and blink her lashes real fast Quince
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: susanm@an.hp.com (Susan Margulies)
Subject: AMC: FF'ing comes back to haunt me
Reply-To: susanm@hp-and.an.hp.com
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara Division
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1.3 PL5
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 16:55:19 GMT

On Monday's show when Nat was in the car with Carter/Kyle,
she had two flashbacks that I musta missed due to excessive
FF-ing of Trevor/Galen/Natalie back when Kate Collins was
still around.  Anyways, I thought it was nifty for them to
suddenly give Not a brain while simultaneously restoring out
faith in the continuity people!!!!  

Since the update didn't detail it, here's what happened:

Notolie remembered Trevor telling her Galen's sicko ex 
whistles Debussy's "Reverie" to this day after beating 
Galen senseless after a performance of Debussy - then she 
realizes that is the song from the music box that "Kyle" 
is whistling.  Then she remembers Trevor talking about 
Carter's scruffy face when she touches "Kyle's" face and 
freaks out!

And we thought the continuity person was on vacation!?
That is some damn fine continuity in action, dontcha think?
I *barely* even remember hearing the dialogue they used for 
the flashbacks, let alone considering them significant 
at the time!

Susan
--
Susan E. Margulies       |  "The young lady with the uzi,
HP Imaging Systems       |   is she single?"
508-681-2153             |       
susanm@hp-and.an.hp.com  |  - River Phoenix as Karl in "Sneakers"

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: dias@milton.u.washington.edu (Vivian Dias)
Subject: Re: SB - Friday Thoughts
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 14:48:36 GMT

In article <3881@randvax.rand.org> pboren@rand.org (Pat Boren) writes:
>
>>  Okay, I will now prepare myself for the wrath of the BJ lovers.  Come
>>  on I dare you...
>
>OK, here's my wrath:  you're right.  Sorry to sting you like that,
>but I couldn't resist.  :-)

  Ouch, oooh, the pain, the agony, it's gonna be awhile before I recoup
  from that one, Pat
>
>Even though BJ's annoying at the moment, I still think she a good
>character.  But it's time to move her on to something other than a victim.
>Get on with some other storyline with her, a happy one, one that shows
>some depth besides simpering at Warren.
>
>Pat

  Well, it looks like we may just be getting what we wanted.  Monday's
  show finally showed BJ behaving like an adult.  She's appears ready
  to face what she's blocking.  It looks like Warren's outburst was
  what she needed to see that she doesn't have to face this alone.

  -Vivian
>-- 
>
>	Patricia Boren
>	pboren@rand.org
From: illya@pyrtor.UUCP (Illya Barnett)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: TAN: World Series
Date: 16 Oct 92 16:37:39 GMT
Reply-To: illya@pyrtor.UUCP (Illya Barnett)
Distribution: na
Organization: Pyramid Technology Canada, Toronto, Ontario

In article <1992Oct15.002349.14520@bmerh85.bnr.ca> mjheal@bnr.ca writes:
>
>Well Spud,  I hate to say "I told you so" BUT I DID!!!!  OK,  I will be
>nice here.  THE JAYS WON!!!  Mr. LaRussa looked so sad!! WE KILLED THEM!!
>I hope you take this defeat well.  9-2!!!!  We sure took this victory well.
>
>Again Spud.  Thanks for talking to LaRussa and letting us win those two
>games in Oakland.  They made all the difference! :)
>
>It's been fun and hopefully we can do it again!! 
>
>MJ
>
>BLUE JAYS ALL THE WAY IN 92 !!!!!
>
>-- 
>MJ Heal        *        BNR,Ottawa,ON,Canada        *        mjheal@bnr.ca

MJ, I agree -- this is the Blue Jays' year!  As we've become so fond
of saying:
		IN YOUR FACE, OAKLAND!!



-- 
Illya Barnett                   |"With the gravity so many claim of their
illya@pyrtor.UUCP               |existence, it's a wonder these nine planets
..pyramid!pyrtor!illya          |don't get confused and collide.."-Bourbons
			        |   ***     GO BLUE JAYS!!!    ***
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: e2hooger@leibniz.uwaterloo.ca (Erica Hoogerbeets)
Subject: DOOL: Character opinions
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 19:57:20 GMT

I find it really funny how much I disagree with most of the vocal
people in this newsgroup! I also find it REALLY funny how you guys
can always find what you're looking for.

For instance, for Jenn's shower, I did NOT think it centered on
Carly. Okay, it did have a scene with her and Jenn talking about 
Carly having a baby, but let's face it, that's something you talk
about at a shower. Other than that, we saw Isabella and Jenn. But,
since you're looking so hard to see Carly everywhere, you do. Maybe
if you weren't looking SO hard to find every instance of Carly 
appearing on the show, you wouldn't notice it quite so much. I do
agree that she seems to be taking over the show lately (the only
one with much of a storyline other than Isabella),but I don't find
it all that bad. I'd rather watch her than Kim or Marlena!

Then there's Danielle. Ok, I liked the character. Ok, I liked the
actress. But I didn't think she was all THAT wonderful and I certainly
do NOT believe for a second that she was solely responsible for the
ratings boost that we saw. I personally think that the storyline had
a lot more to do with it. After all, it was something interesting
happening for a change! I don't think you'd find that Danielle would
do much for the ratings if she just came back to the show and was a
character with a more plain storyline.

As for the guys on the show... well, I've never been a big fan of Jack's
appearance but I do love his character. Comic relief is great. Drake has
definitely improved over the last little while (never cared for his looks
and still don't) in his acting. Tim is gross!!!!!! Yuck, ew, blech.

:-)

Just a few thoughts I had to express.

Erica

Oh yeah, I LOVED it when Stella SCREAMED at Marlena! Totally irrational!
Great stuff.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: schwinge@utkvx3.utk.edu (schwinge, angela m)
Subject: Re: KL:  Start your Engines
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords: Anyone catch the commercial?
Organization: University of Tennessee Computing Center
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 12:28:00 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.182957.9146@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>, jackie8@dasher.uucp (Jackie Brady) writes...
>In article <1992Oct8.172617.5143@cbfsb.cb.att.com> brb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (beverly.r.britt) writes:
>>Everyone ready for the season premiere on 10/29?
> 
>More than ready.
> 
>> 
> 
>I didn't want to admit this, but I'm so starved for some
>KL I actually _look forward_ to this commercial airing while
>I'm watching CBS.  Gawd my life is pathetic..... :-)

Mine too:)
> 
>>
>>See ya on the cul-de-sac!
> 
>I'll bring the casserole to the get together that Karen always
>seems to have the first episode of the season for one reason or
>another.... :-)
>>
Well I will bring a "Better than Sex" cake.  No kidding there really is such a
recipe and it is wonderful but I could argue with the better than sex part:)

>>Bev
> 
>Jackie
>---
>Jackie Brady/jackie8@cc.bellcore.com/908-699-5458 (insert usual disclaimer)
>(do not reply to the address in "From:" section. Use id in .sig to reply)

Angela
schwinge@utkvx3.utk.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: lcheap@cac.washington.edu (Laurel Cheap )
Subject: Re: AMC:TAN:NEWBETS: The Tad Lotto 921014
Organization: UW Computing
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 21:47:47 GMT

In article <1992Oct15.202132.12321@u.washington.edu> lcheap@cac.washington.edu (Laurel Cheap ) writes:
>
>February 14th, 1993  (Tad be my Valentine!)
>Bailys 

Woops, forgot to look at the calendar.  Please make that the 15th
since the 14th is a Sunday.  That way we'll get an inkling that he's
back in a big cliffhanger on Friday with the actual qualifying     
appearance on the following Monday.  && <-- both fingers crossed  :)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laurel Cheap           University of Washington   lcheap@u.washington.edu
Information Systems    Seattle, Washington  USA   a.k.a. Brendan's mommy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps