HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith)
Subject: Re: 100000
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 19:03:53 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.013825.1583@merrimack.edu> burkems@merrimack.edu writes:
>This is the year the Celts will win their seventeenth world championship and
>Bird, Mchale and Parish will get yet another championship ring. Sorry Michael.
>Matt

naw, i dont think so....

- nate, a raving manic celtic fan
From: jnkontos@eos.ncsu.edu (JIMMY NICK KONTOS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: The Warriors
Date: 6 Apr 92 13:53:18 GMT
Organization: Project EOS - North Carolina State University


	How many of you think that the Warriors will hang with Portland, 
Phoenix, Seattle, and LA Lakers these next two weeks and and take the
Pacific divisin title?

	By the way did anybody see that incredible game Friday where the
Warriors, down by 15 with 5 min. left, came back and took the Kings in
overtime.
I think it was a great win since Tim Hardaway had fouled out late in
regulation.
Marciulonis played a great game.  Its hard for good teams to be mentally
prepared to play against cellar dwellers.  After all look what happened
to
Chicago when they played Orlando at home.



	-Jimmy-
From: terra@reed.edu (Terra Goodnight)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: BOXSCORE: Kings 103 - Clippers 97
Date: 17 Apr 92 17:13:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Apr17.171354.17591
Organization: Reed College, Portland OR

sac 103, lac 97   14apr92

sac (28-52)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
simmons,lionel    38    5  16   0  0   0  0   - 13   1   3  1  1  0  0  0   10
tisdale,waymon    39   10  20   0  0   4  4   -  7   2   3  0  2  1  1  0   24
causwell,duane    18    0   1   0  0   0  0   -  5   0   1  3  2  4  0  0    0
ritchmond,mitch   43    8  18   0  3   4  6   -  4   7   4  3  5  0  0  0   20
webb,spud         43    6   9   1  2   6  7   -  2   8   2  4  4  0  0  0   19
bonner,anthony    35    5  11   0  0   5  6   -  7   3   4  2  3  0  0  0   15
brown,randy       10    3   5   0  0   1  2   -  1   1   2  1  3  1  0  0    7
chilcutt,pete     14    4   5   0  0   0  0   -  1   0   0  0  0  0  0  0    8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sac totals       240   41  85   1  5  20 25   0 40  22  19 14 20  6  1  0  103
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .482   .200   .800       team rebs 10, team TO's 2

lac (44-35)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
norman,ken        42    5  10   0  0   3  7   - 14   3   4  2  3  4  0  0   13
manning,danny     36    9  12   0  0   2  2   -  9   5   4  1  1  2  2  1   20
smith,charles     30    5  10   0  0   4  4   -  1   0   5  3  5  5  0  0   14
harper,ron        44    8  20   0  1   3  3   - 11   5   0  2  5  0  0  0   19
grant,gary        33    6   9   1  1   1  1   -  1  10   2  1  3  0  0  0   14
young,danny       14    0   1   0  0   0  0   -  1   2   1  0  1  0  0  0    0
rivers,doc        21    4  11   0  2   1  3   -  1   1   1  1  2  0  0  0    9
edwards,james     10    3   7   0  0   0  0   0  0   0   1  0  2  0  0  0    6
vaught,loy         4    1   1   0  0   0  0   -  2   0   1  1  1  0  0  0    2
polynice,olden     6    0   0   0  0   0  0   -  1   1   1  0  1  0  0  0    0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lac totals       240   41  81   1  4  14 20   0 41  27  20 11 24 11  2  1   97
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .506   .250   .700       team rebs  4, team TO's 1

sac   22  26  30  25  -  103
lac   31  26  20  20  -   97

attendance 12569, time 2:12, officials: DGarretson,EFRush,LGrillo
From: EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Home Court for Det-Bos????
Date: 14 Apr 92 20:42:14 GMT
Organization: Wayne State University, C&IT

In article <1992Apr14.202519.2337@EE.Stanford.EDU>
mack@isl.Stanford.EDU (mack) writes:

>
>EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu writes:
>
>>Any team can beat any other team on a good night.
>>Personally I don't value the home court in a Det-Bos series, seeing how good
>>Detroit's road record is this season, and how bad Boston's road record is.
>
>And how good Boston's home record is and how bad Detroit's home record
>is.
>
>>--Eric
>
>    --mack
>
At least Detroit is winning at home *and* away.
The same can't be said for Boston!
A winning home record isn't my definition of bad. A losing road record is!
Detroit's home record is better than their away record, so there!

--Eric
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Home Court for Det-Bos????
Date: 17 Apr 92 18:32:29 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <167CCC00F.EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu> EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu writes:
>Ok, funny man. Now explain to us how the Celts are going to win the
>championship with a 17-24 road record? I don't believe that a team with
>a losing road record has ever won a championship.

There must be. In 1978, the champions Bullets finished the regular season
44-38. If they didn't have a losing record on the road, it means they
finished at the best 23-17 at home. It's unlikely.

Who were the favorites in 1978 AFTER THE REGULAR SEASON?

-- Portland finished with the best record, but league MVP Bill Walton was
   injured and missed the playoffs.
-- the 76ers were the best in the east but Dr. J and company choked.

OK, Boston's chance of winning the championship == 
the probability(MJ and company choked) * probability(Drexler got injured).

Gidi, the probability master, please figure out the numbers.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
From: liang@saul.cis.upenn.edu (Chuck Liang)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Big Win for the Nets
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:16:24 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Apr15.160834.2333@Princeton.EDU> dmjoffe@dry.Princeton.EDU (David M. Joffe) writes:
>Standings in the Eastern Conference as of today:
>
>6)	*Indiana 39 41       (at Nets, Cleveland)
>6)	Nets     39 41       (Indiana, Orlando)
>8)	Atlanta  37 42       (Knicks, at Cleveland, Chicago)
>9)	Miami    37 43       (Milwaukee, at Boston) 
>

  What's Atlanta and Miami's head to head record?  What are their
conference records?  I'm rooting for Miami to make the playoffs.  It
would be a landmark achievement - we can no longer call them an
"expansion team."











Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: jbhuber@iastate.edu (Joseph B Huber)
Subject: Re: Laker Injuries
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 23:59:01 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.184648.12540@talon.ucs.orst.edu>
navarrer@bionette.CGRB.ORST.EDU (Roy Navarre -- Botany and Plant Pathology)
writes:

>Gidi take a hike.
[...]
>Where is this franchise going? They have serious problems. What is one
>instant cure--Shaq.  How else are they going to turn things around?--in time
>over several years.

Putting Shaq on the current Laker roster is DEFINITELY NOT an instant cure,
unless he can consistently hit 18-20 ft jump shots, toss in a 3ptr every game,
and handle the ball.  What he could do is give the Lakers some trading
leverage so that the Lakers can solve their real problems.  The Lakers need
guards, guards, guards, and a small forward. Another center isn't going to
help. 

A consistent shooting guard would help the Lakers considerably.  A guy like
Hornacek could do wonders for the Lakers, and I don't think there are any
great shooters coming out in the draft.

I'm with Gidi, go for the playoffs. I don't think there is going to be much
"creaming" going on by any team in the first round of the Western Conference
playoffs.

GO LAKERS!!

-- 
Joe Huber 
(jbhuber@iastate.edu)        | Capt. James T. Kirk on the 2nd law of thermo: 
Dept. of Mech. Egr.          |  "It's not a hundred percent efficient,
Iowa State University        |   but nothing ever is."
From: davet@mozart.amd.com (David L. Tetreault)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Pervis Ellison
Date: 5 Apr 92 17:50:27 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Austin, Texas

Does anyone have any info on Pervis????

thanks in advance.

dave
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: MCMASTER@LSTC2VM.stortek.com (Jim McMaster)
Subject: Re: The Big East Is Back
Organization: StorageTek SW Engineering
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 16:40:34 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.230325.28126@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>
gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
 
>
>The Big East conference snuck into prime time TV yesterday when
>Georgetown beat Seton Hall in a scintilating 72-61 shootout.
>
>For contractual reasons, the game was billed as an NBA matchup between
>New York and Detroit.  Yeah, right.
>
>Third quarter score:  13-10.  Say WHA?!!!
>
>As usual, the broadcast was brought to you by Dutch Boy paints.
>
>
>--Gidi
 
Was that a college game?  I thought both teams sneaked in high school
players.
 
That was the worst NBA game I have ever seen.  Of course, these are the
two teams I hate most, so I enjoyed laughing at them.
 
Jim McMaster
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: marcus@wdl1.wdl.loral.com (Marcus J Louie)
Subject: BOXSCORE: sac75gsw74.03apr92
Organization: Loral Western Development Labs
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 17:56:23 GMT

Here's the boxscore for the Kings-Warriors OT games played 03apr92:

sac 116, gsw 124   03apr92

MISSING referees names

sac (24-51)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
simmons,lionel    49    6  14   0  0   3  6   5 16   3   4  3  2  2  0  0   15
tisdale,waymon    38    8  18   0  0   5  8   6 14   3   5  0  3  0  0  0   21
causwell,duane    31    6  13   0  0   2  2   2  6   0   3  1  3  0  0  0   14
richmond,mitch    46    9  23   0  5   5  8   5 11   8   5  3  7  0  0  0   23
webb,spud         46   10  16   4  5   3  4   0  5   8   4  2  2  0  0  0   27
bonner,anthony    34    4  10   0  0   4  8   1  3   1   4  1  1  1  0  0   12
les,jim            4    0   0   0  0   0  0   0  0   2   0  0  0  0  0  0    0
chilcutt,pete      2    0   0   0  0   0  0   0  0   0   0  0  0  0  0  0    0
brown,randy       15    2   7   0  0   0  0   1  3   2   1  0  1  0  0  0    4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sac totals       265   45 101   4 10  22 36  20 58  27  26 10 19  3  0  0  116
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .446   .400   .611       team rebs  8

gsw (50-24)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
mullin,chris      50   12  28   0  3   3  4   1  5   2   3  0  4  1  0  0   27
owens,billy       40    7  13   0  0   1  4   3  9   3   5  0  2  3  0  0   15
hill,tyrone       19    3   4   0  0   0  0   2  5   0   3  0  1  0  0  0    6
elie,mario        32    4   8   0  0   3  4   1  5   3   5  1  1  0  0  0   11
hardaway,tim      46    7  23   1  7   2  2   1  3  15   6  2  5  0  0  0   17
marciulionis,saru 41   12  20   1  1   7  8   2  8   9   2  1  5  0  0  0   32
alexander,victor   4    0   0   0  0   2  2   0  1   0   1  0  0  0  0  0    2
tolbert,tom        6    1   2   1  1   0  0   0  4   0   0  1  0  2  0  0    3
gatling,chris     25    4   6   0  0   3  6   3 15   0   5  0  1  2  0  0   11
buechler,jud       2    0   0   0  0   0  0   0  0   0   0  1  0  0  0  0    0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gsw totals       265   50 104   3 12  21 30  13 55  32  30  6 19  8  0  0  124
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .481   .250   .700       team rebs 12

sac   33  27  17  29  10  -  116
gsw   14  30  29  33  18  -  124

attendance 15025, time 2:34, officials: ?,?,?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: jamesd@techbook.com (James Deibele)
Subject: Re: Can you buy players?
Organization: TECHbooks of Beaverton Oregon - Public Access Unix
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 04:11:32 GMT

ec120wee@sdcc4.ucsd.edu (Anthony Minkoff) writes:

>It seems you could make a pretty lucrative business out of this.
>If you have a terrible team with no real prospects for being decent
>in the near future (e.g., Minnesota or Sacramento), just stay bad.
>Sell the rights to your #1 pick (no worse than 4th overall, and 1st
>one time out of six) to the highest bidder, get one of top four
>picks again, sell the rights again, etc...  You won't have to worry
>about paying good players-- your total costs for players' and
>coaches' salaries could be kept under $4 million-- and
>administrative costs will be low.  Ticket sales won't be the best,
>but you could keep your head above water, and make additional
>income by scheduling occasional games against the Globetrotters.
>You should move the franchise to a city where crime rates are low,
>so you won't have to worry about being murdered by angry fans.

We finally have an explanation of why Bill Russell was made GM ...

It's interesting that nobody seems to buy players this way.  I'm not
much of a baseball fan, but it seems that the big-city teams can play
their players a lot more than the small towns.  The Mets or Yankees can
afford to have several 6 or 7 million dollar players (assuming that the
big-salary players do have a positive effect on play) since the
increased interest in a good team means more tickets, more cable, more
advertising, etc.

The NBA teams can't do this because of the salary cap.  I'd hate to see
that change.  But it is interesting that the Knicks didn't just buy
Rolando Blackman from the Mavs, to give one example of where New York
has money (backed by Paramount Corp.) and nothing that the Mavs really
want in terms of players.  Well, yeah, I'm sure the Mavs would take
Ewing, but they probably have no interest in Gerald Wilkins, Kiki
Vandeweghe, etc.  

Of course, it was years after the Sixers bought Julius before they
actually got the championship.  And when they bought him, they had one
of the most talented teams of all time, but couldn't get the pieces to
work together properly.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: tamada@cheshire.oxy.edu (Michael K. Tamada)
Subject: Re: Another Incentive for losing
Organization: Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA  90041
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 00:49:08 GMT

In article <matthew.702582944@pram.cs.ucla.edu> matthew@pram.cs.ucla.edu (Matthew Merzbacher) writes:

>Consider the following scenario:
     [...]
>You discover that you can't manage to come in 4th - 5th place is the
>highest you'll end up.
>
>Wouldn't you throw a few games (if you could) to make yourself a sixth
>seed.  Now, if you win your first round matchup (and we already assumed
>you had equal chance against Boston or Cleveland), you'll get a much
>easier second round matchup.

     I was about to post an article with exactly this thought, but aimed
at Sonics fans.  The Sonics actually have a chance to overtake the Spurs
(with Robinson out, the Spurs are slumping and only 1 game ahead of the
Sonics).  That would put the Sonics at #5, and I suggest that that is     
actually less desirable than finishing #6 or #7.  Three reasons for this:

1.  The #5 team has to play the #4 team in the first round, which currently
is the Suns -- who I think have whupped the Sonics this season.   

2.  As Matthew pointed out, if you get past #4 you then have to face the
#1 team -- the Trailblazers.  Despite the scare the Sonics gave them last 
year, the Sonics I think have little chance against the Blazers...they'll 
play them tough as always but will lose as always.

3.  If instead the Sonics finish at #6 or #7, their first round opponent
will be either the Warriors or the Jazz (under the current standings),
and their second round opponent, if they make it, will likely be the other 
team of that pair.  The Warriors are unpredictable, and the Jazz look  
vulnerable:  they actually have a worse record than the Blazers and Warriors,
and are barely ahead of the Suns.  And of course the Sonics have already 
beaten the Jazz twice in Utah.
     So by finishing #6 or #7, the Sonics will probably face GS and Utah
instead of Pho and Portland, and I think GS-Ut is an easier row to hoe
than Ph-Por.
     Note:  I'm not saying the Sonics should be favored against GS
or Utah, what I am saying is that their chance of winning the series
are greater than vs. Pho or Por.
     So Benoit's convenient injury joins the list of other suspicious
center injuries...the Sonics and Spurs are in a race to fall to the #6
or #7 spot; the Lakers and Rockets are racing for lottery.  The Clippers,
poor misguided souls, as usual are doing the wrong thing -- winning games.
:) :)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |__	      o
  | W			   Mike Tamada
		  |\	   Institutional Research Office
		   \O	   Occidental College
		    |      tamada@oxy.edu
		   /|
		  | |
From: jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Jim Mann)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: FAB FIVE !!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 6 Apr 92 13:58:48 GMT
Reply-To: jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com

In article <1992Apr5.015704.11577@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>  
gyuwono@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Gunawan Yuwono) writes:
> In article <1992Apr5.013751.18281@cs.wayne.edu>  
delledg@jake.cc.wayne.edu (De V
> aughn Elledge) writes:
> 
> >The FAB FIVE have made it to the NCAA championship game. Defeating
> >Cincinnati by 3!!!!!!!!!!! WOOF!!!!!! WOOF!!!!!!! WOOF!!!!!!!
> 
> Correction : Michigan beat Cincinnati by 4 ( 76-72 ).
> 
> Those freshmen are REALLY, REALLY, REALLY fabulous ......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yep, and I bet that they know they are in college (as in 
rec.sport.basketball.college) and not yet in the pros
(as in rec.sport.basketball.pro).  Many of their fans apparently
don't know that yet.

--
Jim Mann                                       
jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com 
Stratus Computer
From: awesley@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Tony Wesley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Mensa -- what a bunch of idiots (was YEAH!, etc)
Date: 13 Apr 92 22:29:36 GMT
Organization: National Federation of Associations

EIVERSO@cms.cc.wayne.edu writes:

>In article <kujimvINNs5u@utkcs2.cs.utk.edu>

>>Who said I don't know anything about AIDS?  All I was making a point about 
 was hat Larry doesn't currently have it (to the best of my knowledge) and
>>BTW, I am not ignorant, I be a Mensan, member # 1130662 with a 140 I.Q.,
>>so what's yours?
>>
>>Neil

Neil, you can have an IQ of 600 and still be ignorant.  

>This has gone far enough! If you're so f*uckin' smart, why don't you learn
>how to properly quote from a posting? 

Indeed.  I've tried to parse "All I was making a point was hat . . .
what's yours?" several times and I think I understand what Neil was
trying to say but he certainly didn't say it.

>And while you're at it, learn how to use a carriage return! What, you
got a >300 column terminal down at the Mensa clubhouse?

300 baud, more likely.  With a TRaSh-80.

>And my IQ is also 140 (maybe a little higher *heh-heh*) [...]

Hey, if you're so smart, what are you doing at Wayne State? heh heh.

Getting way off of basketball, I joined Mensa (founding member of
Lansing chapter, 1973) back when I was too young to know better and I
soon quit.  Never saw such a bunch of dumb shits in my life.  No
smiley.

>--Eric

Neil, if you have some point to make, please make it.  And perhaps, ask
one of those Mensans to help you edit your posts.
-- 
 Tony Wesley					 awesley@vela.acs.oakland.edu

   The right most valued by all civilized men is the right to be left alone.
							-- Louis Brandeis
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: jerryo@pdx103 (Jerry Orleck)
Subject: Re: Portland vs. Petro (Was: Most Improved Player)
Organization: Intel Corp., Hillsboro, Oregon
Distribution: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 23:50:06 GMT

>  Have you read my other article on the matter Jerry? - The one about
>Clyde and Petro playing togeather - with Clyde the point guard?

Yes.  I did.  Clyde does have more assists than Terry but, that's because
much of the offense funnels through him and he gets lots of fast break
assists.  I do not believe that Clyde would thrive at the point.

>  You do know that Petrovich is averaging more than 20 pts per game
>and shooting 51% don't you?  Those are all-star numbers.  Any good
>coach could have figured out a way to use him if he tried.  Portland
>gave up on him, I contend, because they believed that he could never
>adjust his game well enough to the NBA.

He's is having a terrific season.  I beleive that Portland gave up on him
because they just didn't see extended minutes for him behind Terry and
Clyde and thought that they could strengthen the club for the Championship
run.  It was a gamble - If Walter comes off the bench regularly and hits
his jumper and they win the Championship do you still complain about the
gamble?  On the other hand, the trade went so badly that I believe that
Walter become a distraction.  I think trying to work him into the rotation
tilted a fragile balanced chemistry.  They traded a 12th player and tried
to put his replacement into regular rotation.  So as I'm sitting here
disagreeing with your reasons I'm agreeing with your basic assumption - it
was a terrible trade.  At any rate, I'm happy for Petro.  Go Nets!

>  I contend that Petrovich would've been a better 3rd guard for
>Portland than Danny Ainge - not to mention Walter Davis.

I don't know.  How did he do last year behind Theus?

-- 

Jerry Orleck                                  

jerryo@ichips.intel.com
From: edmunds@vaxr.llnl.gov
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: The Playoff Race
Date: 8 Apr 92 20:49:29 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: LLNL_LIS


  > (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
  > If Houston does manage to tie L.A., I have no idea who will win the
  > tie-breaker.  They are 2-2 for the season and if they tie, say at 44-38,
  > they will also have identical 28-26 conference records.
  > Anyone knows what the next tie-breakers are?
  > 
  I think it's either a pose-down between the rival cheerleaders or the
GM's play a game of "Horse".
  Actually, it's probably some strength-of-record deal, like record against
winning teams.  And I think a coin flip is down at the bottom.

-- Dave Edmunds
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: jdt29225@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jazzy J )
Subject: Re: NBA Most Improved Player
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 16:54:48 GMT

gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:

>afcanav@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (VIC CANACCI) writes:
>>Is it obvious, or am I just being a homer, that Mark Price deserves 
>>Comeback Player of the Year ?
>>

>Doesn't matter -- there is no such award.

	I believe there used to be such an award, but they stopped giving it
	because it kept on going to players that came back from drug rehab,
	it was getting ridiculous.

	Jazzy J
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  "I am human and I need to be loved,            | Jazzy J                   |
|   just like everybody else does..." - The Smiths| jdt29225@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu | 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith)
Subject: Re: NBA Most Improved Player
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 20:27:20 GMT

In article <6480@shodha.enet.dec.com> heiser@fretz.enet.dec.com (Michael A. Heiser) writes:
>
>Tim Perry  tripled most of his stats and Pervis Ellison doubled some of his.
>The rest are wannabes.
>-

so what?  if you divide John Bagley's current season by his last, your
little calculator starts blinking *ERROR*.

- nate
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro