HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dhartung@chinet.chi.il.us (Dan Hartung)
Subject: Re: compressed : Not bloody likely
Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 17:59:58 GMT

drinnen@deakin.OZ.AU (Philip Shead) writes:
>As the title suggest me and windows are having a little to do over the
>dos compression. Whenever I try to run a dos application it says : 
>One of more of the program components are compressed. 
>And will of course refuse to run it, So does anybody have any suggestions.
>The files are not compressed and I re-installed windows but that had no effect.

This may not be a problem with Windows at all.  If you are running a DOS
application in a window (even full screen) and the error message returned
is text via DOS, and not in a Windows dialog box, then it's not necessarily
a Windows problem (although you may need to allocate more resources FROM
windows, or soemthing).

It sounds like a program such as PKLITE or LZEXE was used on a software
package that doesn't like this.  FOr instance, any program that uses 
overlays is the most likely to choke on such compression, as the 
"uncompress" code added to the EXE will screw up the expected memory
sizes and locations.  

If you are running one of the DOS components (e.g. XCOPY.EXE) it may have
been copied and renamed instead of uncompressed via EXPAND.EXE.  Try
running EXPAND on the file and see what happens (no harm if it's not
an EXPANDable file.)

-- 
HYPOCRISY HALL OF FAME:                  | Dan Hartung               |  Ask me
"I would think very hard and long about  | dhartung@chinet.chi.il.us |  about
voting for a presidential candidate who  | Birch Grove Software      | Rotaract!
has had an affair."  -- Gennifer Flowers!
From: c23tra@kocrsv01.delcoelect.com (Todd Alden)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: Mine Sweeper cheating
Keywords: Mine Sweeper, Cheating, Chance
Date: 20 Aug 92 20:34:52 GMT
Organization: Delco Electronics Corp.
Originator: c23tra@kocrsw16


In article <DDVcPB4w165w@cmm.ovum.ka.sub.org>, cm@cmm.ovum.ka.sub.org (Christoph Mueller) writes:
> peaan3@cserve.cs.adfa.oz.au (PEARSON ARRAN) writes:
> 
> >
> >
> > 	I don't think minesweeper is a game of luck.  There is a slight chance
> > element involved in your 2 - 3 moves but once you have a firm point to start
> > then it is possible to work it out.  I think that is the point of the game.
> > the rare cases that it is not easily discerable where to go next, then it is
> > possible to recognise patterns in how the computer places the mines.
> >
> > Oh well, that's my two cents worth!
> 
> Yes and no. In almost every second game where I have about one third solved
> already there are points where it's impossible to tell where there is a
> mine and where there is none. Think of the following example:

I have had times when I could not determine exactly where a mine was and 
had to guess.  The following example is NOT one of them.  The example
is *impossible*!

> 
> ) 1 1 .  "m" is a mine, "." is anything uncovered (no mines), "(" is
> ) m 2 .  the border (or make it "2"s), and "_" are the two yet uncovered
> ) _ 2 .  fields.  How do you tell which "_" is a mine and which is none.
> ) _ 2 .  This happens to me all the time.  The chance is 50% that you hit
> ) m 2 .  I hope that's not how real mine uncovering works but you know more
> ) 1 1 .  about that than I do (guessing from your address ;-)  )

"Solution" 1:

) 1 1 .   This one is impossible (as well as its mirror image).
) m 2 .   
) M 2 .
) . 2 .
) m 2 .  <---- can't be a "2" here (would be a "1" instead)
) 1 1 .

"Solution" 2:

) 1 1 .   This one is impossible as well.
) m 2 .   
) M 2 .  <---- can't be a "2" here (would be a "3" instead)
) M 2 .  <---- can't be a "2" here (would be a "3" instead)
) m 2 .  
) 1 1 .

> 
> Of course this is just one possible situation of many other similar ones.
> 

I doubt that this case happens to you all the time ;^), but I sure that
other cases do.
> 
> 
> 
> ---Christoph, Germany    ---   cm@cmm.ovum.ka.sub.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dysklaemours?  What's that?  How do you spell that?  Do I need that?
> I  *AM*  the  SYSTEM,  the  EMPLOYER,  and  the  ORGANIZATION  !!


---
Todd
-- 


Todd R. Alden (x0218)
Delco Electronics Corporation
From: garyd@netcom.com (Gary Dietz)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: ATM fonts not available when I switch ports
Date: 21 Aug 92 15:58:30 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)


When I switch my printer connection from LPT2: to LPT1:, all of my 
instaled fonts disappear.

Help!

Environment:  Win 3.1, Novell network

Moved remote printer on LPT2: (via Novell facilities) to my desk.
Typed ENDCAP /cancel /lpt1: to make my LPT1: really lpt1: locally
Used control panel PRINTERS to switch from LPT2: to LPT1:

Now, if I choose TI printer on lpt2:, I get all fonts available in my apps
If i choose TI printer on FILE, I get all fonts
If I choose TI printer on lpt1:, my fonts disappear!

Any suggestions?

Gary
-- 

   "To find fault is easy; to do better may be difficult."  -Plutarch
From: reza.naima@uttsbbs.uucp (Reza Naima) 
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Parallel port DAC.
Date: 9 Aug 92 17:18:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Transfer Station BBS, Danville, CA - 510-837-4610/837-5591
Reply-To: reza.naima@uttsbbs.uucp (Reza Naima) 

ME>From: MEB117@psuvm.psu.edu (Matthew E. Bernold)
ME>Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.os 
ME>ms-windows.programmer.tools
ME>Subject: Parallel port DAC.
ME>Message-ID: <92217.191653MEB117@psuvm.psu.edu>
ME>Date: 4 Aug 92 23:16:53 GMT
ME>
ME>I'm l
ME>I have found and used ModPlay Pro, and Scoptrax to play .MOD files 
ME>and
ME>.VOC/.WAV/.SND files respectively, and the sound I get from my <$5.00
ME>resistor bridge is INCREDIBLE (compared to the PC-Speaker...so no 
ME>flames
ME>here about how much better THIS sound-card or THAT sound-card is... 
ME>:-)
ME>       Matthew E. Bernold             MEB117@PSUVM.PSU.EDU
ME>         <<APOCALYPSE>>                  meb@haydn.psu.edu
ME>                                                                      
ME>   

   How did you build your Resistor bridge?

Reza Naima
reza.naima@uttsbbs.uucp                          

--- WinQwk 1.10a #0
From: goh@frith.egr.msu.edu (Yang Chong Goh)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: Procomm
Date: 18 Aug 92 01:23:38 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University

anderson@hg.uleth.ca writes:

>I have recently seen several people talking about Procomm for windows.  Is
>a shareware product still.  If so could someone direct me to an FTP site for
>it.  Thanks
>ANDERSON@HG.ULETH.CA

Procomm For Windows is and never will be a shareware!

Yang Chong Goh (Peter)
Computer Science		Email : goh@cps.msu.edu (Internet)
Michigan State University	Voice : (517)3374099
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc
From: evans1@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (Dan Evans)
Subject: Hard drive caches and smartdrv
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 20:50:27 GMT
Keywords: caching harddrives


Hi Netters,

I have a question regarding hard disk caches and smartdrive.

I'm running a 386SX with a 80 MB hard drive.  I just installed a 
Quantum Hardcard 2 105XL.  The hardcard itself has a cache on the
controller and for the sake of argument I will assume that the
original HD has an on-board cache as well.

I am running the smartdrv version from MS-DOS 5.0 with the read
and write caches enabled for all HD's and the read caches enabled
the floppy drives (the smartdrv default).

The question I have is:

Am I double caching unnecessarily? According to smartdrive the 
cache gets smaller when windows is actually running and I have the
minimum cache size set to 0 so that windows will come up in 386 enhanced
mode by default instead of standard mode. If the size of the cache
from smartdrive (when windows is running) is smaller then the cache
on the hardcard would I gain (or lose) anything by disabling the
read/write caches that smartdrv creates?
-- 
The Danimal                @@@@-                    @@@@-            
                          @@@@@-      @@@@-        @@@@@-       @@@@-
UUCP: att!ihlpm!evans      @@@@-     @@@@@-         @@@@-      @@@@@-
                                      @@@@-                     @@@@-
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: kingw@fraser.sfu.ca (King Rio Wong)
Subject: Re: WINSPEED DRIVERS LOCATION (not?)
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 00:20:14 GMT

edowdy@vax1.umkc.edu writes:

>down winspeed.lzh, not winspeed.zip.  Nevertheless, I thought we were talking
>about
>drivers which improved screen redraws, to be used in place of or along side
>our current trident drivers. I may not have looked far enough here on this
>program, but I don't see any drivers right off.

>Anyway, my fault. I think I got the wrong program, unless I misunderstood what
>it was in the first place.

>Anyone got any idea where the winspeed drivers can be located?

    Isn't Winspeed (the software windows accelerator) commercial software?
I've seen it being sold in a local software store, too.

Timothy

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: aa330@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Neil Gould)
Subject: Re: Smartdrive.sys & WIN 3.0 /3
Reply-To: aa330@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Neil Gould)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 13:52:30 GMT


In a previous article, dhartung@chinet.chi.il.us (Dan Hartung) says:

>aa330@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Neil Gould) writes:
>>
>>Does anyone know if SMARTDRV.EXE will work with WINDOWS 3.0? I need to 
>>stay with v3.0 until all of the drivers for devices on that machine are
>>available for v3.1.
>
>Yes, it works just fine with 3.0, and with all other software I've run
>so far.
>

In tests over the weekend, I've pinned down the problem to being Windows 3.0
needing disk caching. Indeed, it *does* work with SMARTDRV.EXE, as long as
the disk read *and write* caching is enabled. There even seems to be a slight
improvement in performance over equivalently configured SMARTDRV.SYS.

Windows 3.0 corrupts itself with *either* SMARTDRV if caching is disabled.

My needs are to disable caching on a SyQuest removable hard disk drive. Since
this is possible with the <-> switch with SMARTDRV.EXE, but not with .SYS, I
thought it would be ideal to use the .EXE version.

So, the conclusion:
I'm currently using SMARTDRV.EXE with caching enabled on the fixed disk, and
disabled on the SyQuest. This will solve one problem on a system-wide basis,
but I don't *dare* access the SyQuest from within WINDOWS lest I corrupt the
disk, my WINDOWS .GRP, .INI, and .INF files, etc.

Any users who have found a way around this one; I'm all eyes!

Hope this info can help someone.

-- 
		neil gould  +  aa330@cleveland.freenet.edu
		SysOp: Video Arts Department; Co-SIGop - Audio Arts SIG
		Opinions available at discount rates!
From: geoffb@coos.dartmouth.edu (Geoff Bronner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: PS Level 2 drivers?
Date: 19 Aug 92 13:51:50 GMT
Reply-To: geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU
Organization: Amos Tuck School


We've just added a couple of Apple Laserwriter IIg's to our inventory here
and some of our PS/2's that print to them via a Novell server are having
problems printing properly from Windows and Word for DOS 5.0, 5.5. Apple
suggests that we need a postscript level 2 compatible driver but I have
been told that Microsoft is reluctant to admit that the problem exists.

Is there a way to get the newest versions of netps, netps55 and the
windows pscript driver (3.52?) via internet or UseNet or do I have to call
Microsoft and hope that I get a tech support rep who will admit to the
problem?

post or email, I get both...

Thanks,

-Geoff
--
geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU - Computing Support Consultant, Tuck School of Business

	"Excuse me, you're not that cool."
		-Dana Carvey
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: rick@sundance.SJSU.EDU (Richard Warner)
Subject: Re: TCP/IP DLL for Windows 3.1?
Organization: San Jose State University - Math/CS Dept.
Date: 19 Aug 92 23:38:31 GMT

leary@progress.COM (James Leary) writes:

>ken@minster.york.ac.uk writes:

>>Does anyone out there know of a product which gives a TCP transport to
>>Windows 3.1 apps (via a DLL hopefully) which (even more hopefully) conforms
>>to the winsock protocol?

>Novell's LAN Workplace for DOS
>Wollogong's TCP/IP Utilities

You left out Netmanage's NEWT, which is the TCP stack they are
using in their new NFS server and are licensing to a lot of the
X server vendors.

>These are two that have DLL's for support of TCP/IP transports. (We at
>Progress have written our software to support these from within Windows).

>Regards,

>Jim Leary
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: GeraldR@sunfish.ratsys.com (Gerald Ruderman)
Subject: Re: Mine Sweeper cheating
Organization: Rational Systems, Inc.
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 20:35:54 GMT

In article <sph0301.46.713628643@utsph.sph.uth.tmc.edu> sph0301@utsph.sph.uth.tmc.edu
 (Kate Wilson) writes:

>I've noticed the following behavior which I can replicate pretty reliably.
>If you select the top left square as the first choice in a new game (this
>is in expert level - haven't tried it on other levels), that square is never 
>a bomb.  But if the mouse 'slips' a little and you hit the square below
>instead, then the top left square almost always turns out to be a bomb.
>It's as though the location of the bombs isn't decided until you make your
>first square selection.  Am I imagining this?

I believe it places all the mines before you start. If you select a square 
with a mine on your first turn it moves that mine so that your first square 
is always safe. It moves the mine to the top left square if that is free  
otherwise it starts from there going along the row until it finds an empty 
square.


Gerald Ruderman                                   geraldr@ratsys.com
From: 881571s@dragon.acadiau.ca (Arnold Spence)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Cardinal VGA drivers? I can't be the only one!
Date: 18 Aug 92 01:41:48 GMT
Organization: Acadia University


This is my second attempt to locate Win 3.1 drivers for a Cardinal
VGA700 card. Am I the only person that bought one of these. Please
help if you can.
-Arnold B. Spence : arnold.spence@dragon.acadiau.ca
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: goudswaa@fraser.sfu.ca (Peter Goudswaard)
Subject: Re: How to get WIN 3.0 Multimedia extensions
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 17:13:54 GMT

chris@zork.cc.binghamton.edu (Chris Peck) writes:

>I just got Bookshelf for Windows & discovered that it requires either
>Windows 3.1 or 3.0 & Multimedia extensions - care the extensions available
>for ftp or download somewhere?  
>-thanks
> chris
>PS - I'm not going to upgrade to 3.1 quite yet, so that's not an option...
          ==============================================================
Perhaps you should reconsider.  Windows 3.1 seems to have fixed at least
1 bug from MM Windows.

>-- 
>chris@zork.cc.binghamton.edu   Chris Peck, SUNY Binghamton, NY 13901
From: IANR009@UNLVM.UNL.EDU (D. Kirk Darnell)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: WinQVT/Net and 3270??
Date: 14 Aug 92 14:01:21 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska

Greetings...
 
I'm using WinQVT/net on an IBM TRN with LSP 1.22 and PCLP 1.34.  I have
most things working but my telnet session to an IBM system will not
work.  I can FTP to the same system so I'm sure the "paths" are all
correct.  The problem lies in the terminal emulation.  Is there any way
to get this product to use 3270 emulation or is there another product
that will provide this service under windows 3.1?
 
Thanks for your help...
 
**********************************************************************
*D. KIRK DARNELL, COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYST                           *
*AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS                                              *
*UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA                                              *
*IANR009@UNLVM.UNL.EDU                                               *
*                                                                    *
* "YOUR ARE THE ONLY ONE IN THE WORLD THAT CAN USE YOUR POTENTIAL!"  *
*                            -ZIG ZIGLAR-                            *
**********************************************************************
 
 
 
 
 
 
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: rrohbeck@kboeng.dec.com (Ralf-Peter Rohbeck)
Subject: Re: Windows == OS
Reply-To: rrohbeck@kboeng.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Int. GmbH
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 15:22:34 GMT


I think one vital thing is missing from either DOS or Windows:
Resource protection/control/management.
IMHO, a system lacking these can't be called an OS. Maybe a partial one.
Well, that flame "DOS is a file system with memory management and program
loader" probably isn't that wrong. That's probably why so many people are
eagerly looking/waiting for OS/2 or WNT. I would like a more stable PC.
Most people do, I think. 
--
===============================================================================
Ralf-Peter Rohbeck          rrohbeck@kbomfg.dec.com         Product engineering
Digital Equipment Int. GmbH rrohbeck%kbomfg.enet.dec.com       Disk drive plant
Sudetenstrasse 5/POB 1356   ...!decwrl!kbomfg.dec.com!rrohbeck)      Kaufbeuren
W-8950 Kaufbeuren           (+49) 8341 / 91-4473                        Germany
#include "disclaimer.h"
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: blakeco@microsoft.com (Blake Coverett)
Subject: Re: SCREENSAVER IN WINDOWS
Date: 11 Aug 92 02:40:26 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Canada Inc.

steveh@devildog.att.com (Steve Hendershott)    wrote
> Is there a way to activate the Windows screensaver with a keystroke
> or mouse click rather than waiting for a timeout or running it from
> control panel? In SYSTEM.INI, the screensaver is named on a line that
> says:

There is no "built-in" way to do this, but there is a rather cool 
workaround.  The .SCR files are really just renamed executables,
as a result you can run them.  To do this add the .SCR extension to the
Programs line in win.ini.  You can then create icons for the .SCR files
and execute them to your hearts content.  If you run them plain you will
get the configuration dialog, if you add a "/s" switch on the command
the saver will blank immediately.  A useful trick is to put icons for
whichever savers you want to use in one group, leave it closed, and add
shortcut keys for each icon.

-Blake
-- 
#include <std/disclaimer.h>                       blakeco@microsoft.com
Mail Flames, Post Apologies.                      ...!uunet!microsoft!blakeco

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: WKWINKEL@ibm.rz.uni-passau.de (Olaf Winkelhake)
Subject: Re:CLOCK icon visibility -- help please
Organization: University of Passau - Germany
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 07:21:55 GMT

Hi,
I don't think you can keep the clock that comes with windows always in front.
There are several replacements for the clock available at ftp.cica.indiana.edu
(or any other ftp site) - I looked through most of them and some had the
'keep in front feature' - though I can't remember which. Most of them weren't
freeware.
Regards,
Olaf Winkelhake
Olaf Winkelhake
Dept. of Economics
University of Passau, Germany
From: tchen@sloth.Reed.Edu (Timothy Chen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: PARADISE 1B  PROBLEMS
Date: 18 Aug 92 23:47:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Aug18.234705.13787
Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR

In article <1992Aug18.113738.39715@urz.unibas.ch>  
eggenberger1@urz.unibas.ch writes:
> Hi, I have a Paradise 1B (512K) video adapter. The 640x480 256 drivers  
for
> this card worked fine with Windows 3.0. However, with Windows 3.1,  
640x480 256
> drivers, such as these of the parad31.zip, exhibit strange problems.
> The video display is o.k. (at least in 640x480 resolution), but it is
> not possible to save a file properly on the diskette drives (e.g. with
> the filemanager). This is not the case with either the original win3.1
> 640x480 16 driver or Windows 3.0 installed. It seems therefore that
> the reason of this problem is the video driver (sounds strange) ?!
> Please send any help to:
> 
> Florian Eggenberger                eggenberger1@urz.unibas.ch

yeah! I had some problem with parad31.zip software too.  When I scrolled  
down the screen, It left all the old mark of the file on the screen. I had  
to use the Windows refresh screen command. if anyone has a solution for  
this problem with the Paradise VGA card, please let us know. Thanks

tchen@reed.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: rvinluan@cs.cornell.edu (Rolando Vinluan)
Subject: Re: Stacker, Windows, Swapfile, & Defrag
Organization: Cornell University, CS Dept., Ithaca, NY
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 22:39:39 GMT

In article <a1aePB1w165w@student.business.uwo.ca>, dszpiro@student.business.uwo.ca (Daniel A. Szpiro) writes:

|> Stacker's SDEFRAG utility will defragment the stacked drive, but will not
|> operate on the unstacked portion. Norton's SPEED DISK won't stop with the
|> small, unstacked portion of my hard drive and is a no-no with Stacker.

	No, it's not. In fact, screate has a copy of SPPED DISK built into it.
Notice that when you ran Stacker's install, it flashes: "Running Norton Speed Disk
to defragment drive..." and stupidly looks for screate in the floppy drive even when
it already has a copy of it in the hard drive. Norton's normal SPEED DISK
should work, though. (If it doesn't, somebody tell me.) In fact, maybe you just need
screate. First, disable the stacker device drivers, and try:

	screate c:\stacvol.dsk

or (just guessing):


	screate c:\stacvol.dsk /o


	I'll try these out later. Tell me what happened at your end.

	(We're talking about v2.0, aren't we?)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: rjf1@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (robert.j.flynn)
Subject: Re: Why no PARADISE video drivers?
Organization: AT&T
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 15:58:39 GMT

In article <1992Aug13.230600.3001@rei.com> fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox) writes:
>Doesn't anyone out there use their Paradise SVGA card with Windows 3.1??
>I have seen several people ask where to get the latest video drivers for
>this card, but the questions go unanswered.
>
>Yes, I am well aware that there are some Paradise 3.1 drivers at
>ftp.cica, but they are full of BUGS and DO NOT WORK!
>

For anyone with a modem I suggest calling the Western Digital BBS. 
Phone Numbers:

<= 2400 Baud
1-714-753-1234

>= 9600 Baud
1-714-753-1068

Communications Parms: N81 Full Duplex.

Hope this helps,

Bob Flynn


Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: bx953@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (David R. Cohen)
Subject: CLOCK icon visibility -- help please
Reply-To: bx953@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (David R. Cohen)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 14:05:52 GMT


An answer to the following question would be greatly appreciated -- please
e-mail responses.

When I run the "clock" program from the accessories group and then minimize
the program, I get the neat icon which shows the current time and date. 
All's well so far.

What I'd like to do, however, is keep this handy icon **in front** of
whatever maximized windows I'm working with, however, so I can always see
what time it is and the date.  As it is, the clock program minimized icon
always hides behind the windows I'm working on, on top of the wallpaper. 
Also, I'd love to be able to get the clock program icon to be onscreen when
booting up into windows, but when I use the "options/save settings" buttons
in program manager to do this, the clock icon is still hidden.

Thanks in advance for your help; again, please e-mail responses.

David
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= THIS MESSAGE IS FROM  =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|                        David R. Cohen                         |
|                  bx953@cleveland.freenet.edu                  |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc