From: tooraj@daneel.rdt.monash.edu.au (Tooraj Enayati)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: What to read at sci
Date: 30 Jul 92 12:09:16 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.

ghbr@fmg.bt.co.uk (Hossein Bagherzadeh Rafsanjani) writes:

>In article <-nmm+ph.bavafa@netcom.com> bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi)writes:

>[Note:  I had no intention of continuing this thread, but as you posed some
>serious questions, I felt I should respond.]

[some stuff deleted]

>> You
>> are not required to ridicule 'my' religion to get a point across either. 

>I have no intention of ridiculing ANY religion.  But I cannot help it when I
>hear someting ridiculus, be it religious (like physical miracles) or not.  It
>may not look ridiculus to you, but it does to me.

>> It was not NICE, you know!  

>I am sorry, if I have offended anybody.  I won't be offended if you find
>something ridiculus in my "religion".  It is one of the effective ways to
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>discredit ridiculus ideas, and help people get rid of them. 

You have given the impression that you didn't believe in any religion, 
or something like that.

[some stuff deleted]

>> >Kamran is certainly an
>> >effective preacher, but alas his line of arguments may work better in Sangsar
>> >than in SCI!  It seems to be the second time I am picking on him.  The first
>> >time was on the magic figure of 1000+260 Hejri Qamari.  (Sorry, Kamran.  In
>> >both occasions I was prompted by your comments, and not by your name.  It just
>> >happened that on both occasions, the remarks came from you.)

>> Thanks for revealing to us what your line of thinking is.  But doost-e aziz
>> I am not in that league.  So this game you have to play by yourself :-)
>> What's left is just few technical questions from you, if I may.

>> How did you determine that somebody 'is' 'certainly' a preacher, 

>My impression from what he is doing on the net.  He is trying to preach
>something, isn't he?  You may call it something else, but it wouldn't matter.

No one can blame Kamran. He is just addressing all the unfair accusition
to Baha'is. Earlier when Farzin was missing all/some of the responses to
his/others articles, he started a big 'marakeh'. 

I am just sick and tired of all this. NOW WAHT IS THE DEAL, WE CAN'T STAY 
QUIET, NETHER CAN WE DEFEND OURSELVES and show our side of the story.  Why 
is it fair for people to post all sorts of accusations on Baha'is and why 
CAN'T we answer them.

I am asking every one who keep asking Baha'is to stop. Why don't you ask
those who post none-sense accusations, so we don't have to respond to
them.

For those who complain about the lengthy responds. They should be 
reminded it is far easier to accuse some one/group (you can even use 
one sentence.) But to clear the matter you need alot more effort and 
words. Saying 'No you are wrong' isn't just enough.

Be fair, put aside all you prejudices.
 
[some stuff abou Sangsar deleted] Sangsaries can take care of it.

>-hossein

Tooraj
-- 
==============================================================================
Tooraj Enayati     Melbourne     Australia     tooraj@daneel.rdt.monash.edu.au
Monash University       Robotic and Digital Technology       (Graduate/Alumni)
==============================================================================