HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: orson@bluemoon.rn.com (Craig Smith)
Subject: Re: Libertarian Party's offical views on abortion
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[024])
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 19:01:52 EDT

As usual, the Libertarian party is solely concerned with Freedoms
and Liberties, and is not at all concerned about Responsibilities.

Until this world understands that Authority [Freedoms, Licenses,
Liberties, etc.] always must have an equal Responsibility
[Obligations, Duties, Rules, etc.] this world is going to
be in sad shape.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: Craig E. Smith      "Life is a fulltime occupation" -- Gene Kallman ::
:: Columbus, Ohio                                                      ::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
From: forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Some Park Service Estimates (formerly: The March in D.C.)
Date: 13 Apr 92 20:00:14 GMT
Organization: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ, USA

From article by judi@wam.umd.edu (Jay T Stein -- saying hi to Betty):
>
> When a man loves a woman, he supports her right to choose.


When a man and woman love each other, they don't kill the child they've
made together.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Abortion and Women's Health.
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 08:32:19 GMT
Distribution: talk.abortion
Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In  <1992Apr16.203300.26636@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>  slkg9733@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steven L. Kellmeyer) writes:
>
> The immediate or short-term complication rate for vacuum abortion is
                                                                    ==
"Is"?  Don't you mean "was"?

> Feb, Mar, April 1973).
                  ====
> A 1971 German study
    ====
> 15 June 1974
          ====
I hope you don't think that you can equate 20-year-old reports with
current medical procedures.

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
From: smccabe@author.ecn.purdue.edu (Sarah A McCabe)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: A question for Welch and any prolifer
Date: 9 Apr 92 01:46:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: noose.1992Apr9.014654.21409
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network

I would like to nominate the following as "Most Ludicrous Statement of the
Month".  Geez, if this is a fair example of Doug's logic, I think we have
a rival for Kevin "pregnancy is like a harmless slavery" Welch!

In article <1992Apr7.021949.12784@ncsu.edu> dsh@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
>
>Birth is an event, not an action taken by the mother. 

Sarah McCabe
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: Susan, Muriel, Cathi, please read this...;-)
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 08:33:56 GMT

<xx7t8sd@rpi.edu> cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) said:
>garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
>><1992Apr10.230121.25145@midway.uchicago.edu> rivk@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>>#<1992Apr8.182426.10884@coopsol.com> gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
>>##Gordon
>>##Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boyfriend of Susan,
>>##Muriel, Cathi, and Nora, and married to the sweetest woman in the world,
>>##               ^^^^^^^^
>>##and darn proud of it.
>>#
>>#We're proud of you, too, Gordon. In fact, we get together sometimes
>>#to have slumber parties and talk about you; don't we, girls?
>
>Nora, I've been meaning to speak to you about that.  I mean, the
>strippers were nice and I enjoyed them quite a bit, but don't you
>think getting the WWF to send those guys in the g-strings to do
>that thing they did <nudgenudgewinkwinkSayNoMORE!> was...well...
>a bit much?

Yeah, but can they give a full body massage by candle-light and leave 
you breathless but wanting more?

>Not that I didn't enjoy it, mind you.  It's certainly a story I'll
>be telling my great-grandchildren.

Yow!  Why didn't I have a grandmother like you.

...

>>I'm inviting Kathi and Linda to my next sleepover, too.  They
>>may or may not have dated Gordon.
>
>You speak as if dating Gordon were an act.  Dating Gordon is a
>whole other level of consciousness....

You sweet talker, Cathi "Rocker".  Now I remember what I miss about you...
<sigh>

>>I'm really hoping that I can get a new ex-boyfriend with gills,
>>too.
>
>I have a recommendation here, but I think that's best handled in
>email.

Ooh!  Ooh!  Copy me too!  Copy me too!


Gordon
Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boyfriend of Susan,
Muriel, Cathi (silver tongued she-devil!), and Nora, and married to the 
sweetest woman in the world, and darn proud of it.
-- 

The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
From: kcochran@isis.cs.du.edu (Keith A. Cochran)
Subject: Re: Kathi, please be careful
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 23:40:19 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.020335.28843@cs.dal.ca> franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin) writes:
>In <1992Apr13.201437.2232@cco.caltech.edu> anne@cco.caltech.edu (Anneliese Lilje) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Apr12.203855.28178@cs.dal.ca> franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin) writes:
>>>In <1992Apr12.190500.918@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> kcochran@isis.cs.du.edu (Keith A. Cochran) writes:
>>>>In article <1992Apr12.165452.17782@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis) writes:
>>>>>In a previous article, gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga) says:
>
>
>>And don't forget that their status on this earth was lower than cattle BECAUSE
>>19th century Christians believed they were "unGodly". 
>   Hmmm. i don't seem to remember that. I remember the thousands
>and thousands of priests who were killed because the Indians were frightened

Do you happen to have any of the NAMES of these "thousands and thousands" of
Christians?

>of them and didn't understand what they were trying to bring. The Indians

Heh.  "Didn't understand"?  Hehe.  Hehehehehehe.  BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!  Geez,
Steve, this has *GOT* to be a joke, but you forgot the :] smiley :]...
>saw the priests as white men who had already terrorized them. However,
>the priests continued to come to share the message. That is all we want.

I think that should read "continued to come and FORCE the message down their
throats", don't you?

>For everyone to have the message, and then they can accept or deny
>the God we reveal to them through the bible.

Of course, if they don't accept, we'll slaughter them also, but you don't
mention that little fact, do you?  Just like the Christians, Mulsims, Islamics,
Catholics, Hindi, etc etc etc have done throughout history in the name of the
"OneTrueGod[TM!]".

>
>>>You answer that one for me...
>   Just did dear...

No you didn't.
>
>>>   NO smilies can make up for you erred logic friend...
>>Erred LOGIC. Hardly. 
>heh... pompous aren't you?   

No, net.asshole, you're the one being pompous.
--
=kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu   |  !uunet!nyx!kcochran  |  kcochran@isis.cs.du.edu  =
=B(0/1/2/3) f- t w- c- d- s++(+) m e++ r(-) p k(+) <--My BearCode, if you care=
=My thoughts, my posts, my ideas, my responsibility, my beer, my pizza.  Ok???=
=Ex-Girlfriend of Rocker, Susan, and Linda, and Damm Proud Of It!! And, FWA!!!=
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: darcy labels opinions lies
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 05:21:54 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.221037.29757@crd.ge.com> keegan@calyx.crd.ge.com (james g keegan jr) writes:
>if anyone wonders how darcy became the net.pariah, take a peek at
>this. a few days ago, i replied to a darcy post with this comment:
>
>        'i want to say that you calling yourself a pro-choicer
>        ("we as pro-choicers") is the single most damaging
>        statement i've seen written on the pro-choice philosophy.
>        you, kevin darcy, are, imo, the least pro-choice person
>        i've seen post to this newsgroup.'
>		<1992Apr13.174429.2292@crd.ge.com>
>
>kebbin replied with this!
>
>	'Please support this. *NOW*. Or forever bear the badge of
>	"liar".'
>		<1992Apr14.043728.4879@rotag.mi.org>
>
>so he's asking me to support an opinion clearly expressed as such
>or else be labeled a "liar."

"Pro-choice" is not a matter of "opinion" [sic], Keegan. It's a well-defined
political label in common use. Either 

	a) support your statement that I am not "pro-choice", 

	b) forever wear the badge of "liar", 

		or 

	c) admit that this "opinion" of yours is so far divorced from reality 
	   that it qualifies as a delusion.

(I apologize for not previously considering possibility (c). I just assumed 
that you'd never ADMIT to being deluded.)

								- Kevin

P.S. Why is it that "pro-choice" gets to be a _subjective_ term for you, but 
     you insist that I have to objectively PROVE that Sue Garvin is a "bitch"? 
     Isn't "bitchiness" AT LEAST as subjective as "pro-choice"? This wouldn't 
     be Yet Another Double Standard, now would it?
From: cprice@treehut.waffle.atl.ga.us (Clyde Price)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: On Quitting being Sexually Active
Date: 16 Apr 92 17:11:59 GMT
Organization: Clyde's TreeHut BBS

forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:

> From article by mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis):
> > 
> > Funny....ever met someone who was sexually active, then decided to
> > be abstinent till marriage or whatever???
> 
> Yes, as a matter of fact, I know at _least_ one! :-)  A very dear
> friend of mind did exactly that.  One of the sweetest guys I know
> too.  (And I do not even mean anyone I am married to either.)
> 
> > Nope, doesn't happen.
> 
> Mr. Christian, of course it does!  Ask around your own friends, and at
> least one of them will surprise you.  Otherwise, what Jesus said to
> the adulteress, "Go and from now on avoid this sin" would have been
> just wasted breath, and of course Jesus never said anything that was
> 'useless'.
> 
> > Even the great Morrissey has had a few flings........
> 
> Who?   Anyway, how about St. Augustine himself?
> Suzanne.


        I thought that I would avoid putting my own personal history in
a public forum, but I can see some value in it here.

        The summer before my senior year in high school I became
involved with a _crazy_ young lady who I found myself in bed with about
20 minutes after the first time I kissed her.  We "went steady" for a
while that summer, but she lied to me and otherwise hurt me so many
times that summer that when we finally broke it off I was numb, but at
that point looking for another involvement (and had my eye on a couple
of likely prospects).

        That fall, some of my classmates started telling me about their
"personal relationship" with the Lord Jesus Christ, and talked about him
as if they had had a conversation with him that morning. (They had!)
They didn't pressure me, but through visiting a church that some of them
attended, I attended a retreat on which I asked Jesus Christ to come
into my life, cleanse me from my sins, and begin making me the person
he wants me to be.

        Since that time I haven't had sex with anybody.  I've dated
some, but not much, and only committed Christian girls, some of whom
were virgins, some of whom who had been saved out promiscuity, and one
or two who had been prostitutes before conversion, but all of whom were
committed to abstain from sex until they married.

        I've met lots of other folks who had been sexually active,
became "new creatures" in Christ, and even though still experiencing
temptation continue to abstain from sex (except for the ones who've
gotten married).

        I've even met one or two non-Christians who're so concerned
about AIDS that they're "scared sexless".



Clyde Price, SysOp: Clyde's TreeHut BBS 404/767-1632/I'm a "whosoever"!
P.O.Box 667      Sec'y: Atlanta Christian Tech Society (meets 3rd Tues)
Red Oak, GA 30272-0667/ CIS#76616,3452 /cprice@treehut.waffle.atl.ga.us
* * John 3:16   F G s l t w t H g H o b S, t w b i H s n p, b h e l.* *
From: franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: The March in D.C.
Date: 13 Apr 92 21:59:13 GMT
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

In <1992Apr13.125406.5955@hemlock.cray.com> mon@cray.com (Muriel Nelson) writes:

>In article <1992Apr10.152728.12945@bmw.mayo.edu> bmc@mayo.edu writes:
>>In article <1992Apr08.061030.25741@liebe.uucp>, kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) writes:
>>|> bmc@mayo.edu (Bruce Cameron) writes:
>>
>>I work with FGC & FWCC. I am a volunteer EMT, donate money & time
>>to Planned Parenthood. I've assisted in 32 emergency deliveries
>>in the past 2 years, donating my time & services.
>>
>>Happy now?
>>
>I am. Bruce was already one of my Heroes.

   Hey Muriel, if that impresses you, you should come up here and check out
what our local priest does in a single year. ANd even more so, there was
this guy named Jesus who DIED to help his fellow man. Are they your 
heroes too?

>muriel

   steve
-- 
aasdSteveFranklin-Subliminal Psychology Major.ks;dlasBlueJaysRULEkasdfeahsdbfl
sd;lfaswoq[eBuyMeAQuadra!!!mbnZMXCNdfsba;KdSPAMiuroqiyetIBMSuxiweuryth'ewr;mxn
qpuepriuPartyOneqtuj;,n.,xnc,kjasFlameMeNot!;lkj;lkgkjd;askElvisLivesjhfquweru
zx.cfranklin@ug.cs.dal.ca,sk;t;lrut[Superboy@ac.dal.cav.zx,Physics!eq3rwkh;oHA
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla)
Subject: Re: A question for any MALE prolifer
Organization: Rescorla for himself.
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 11:16:06 GMT

In article <73533@netnews.upenn.edu> kwelch@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (King of Birds) writes:
>Kevin B. writes
>>Beth
>
>>>Pro-Choice       Anti-Roe                             - E. Elizabeth Bartley
>
>>Interesting tidbit there (Anti-Roe).  We are ALL aware (I hope) that the
>>entire case (Roe v. Wade) was built upon a lie.  And the entire pro-death
>>movement is based upon obscuring what matters with loud, emotional rhetoric.
>
>Well, you see Elizabeth is probably Anti-Roe because Roe has restrictions
>on abortions.  She probably anti-Roe because she wants universal abortion
>rights--from conception until birth.
Neither is true, asshole.
Why don't you try asking instead of speculating?
-Ekr



-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Rescorla, DoD#431, Honda CM400 rider          rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu
Yale University Department of Chemistry            We hack anything.
My mind is now for rent: C/Unix,Vacuum Tech,Machining,P-Chemist. Hire me, eh? 
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley)
Subject: Re: A question for any MALE prolifer
Organization: Liebe Company
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 17:18:56 GMT

mon@cray.com (Muriel Nelson) writes:

>In article <1992Apr08.060536.25602@liebe.uucp> kevin@liebe.uucp (Kevin Brawley) writes:
>>eeb1@ellis.uchicago.edu (e elizabeth bartley) writes:
>>
>>>Pro-Choice       Anti-Roe                             - E. Elizabeth Bartley
>>
>>Interesting tidbit there (Anti-Roe).  We are ALL aware (I hope) that the
>>entire case (Roe v. Wade) was built upon a lie.  And the entire pro-death
>>movement is based upon obscuring what matters with loud, emotional rhetoric.

>Oh, Joy! (sorry, Joy.) Another Kevin for the pro-force-women-to-do-what
>-we-think-they-oughtta side.

>muriel

I love it when the opponent proves my point for me.  Thanks muriel!

Kevin Brawley
From: mprc@troi.cc.rochester.edu (M. Price)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: THE IMPLICATIONS OF ABORTION ON OUR SOCIETY
Date: 14 Apr 92 19:33:08 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Apr14.014843.28309@cs.dal.ca> franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin) writes:

>In <1992Apr13.191915.10157@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> mprc@troi.cc.rochester.edu (M. Price) writes:

>>>know that the Inuit natives still have a Gestation period (not in 
>                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>>     Gestation: the period of carrying developing offspring in the
>>uterus after conception; pregnancy. (Lat. gestatio -- a carrying).
>>      The American Heritage Dictionary, 2nd College Ed).

>>     And those Inuit natives (on average at least) still have not
>>eveolved out of having a gestation period? Shame on them! Steve, of
>>course, leaped fully developed from his mother's womb immediately after
>>conception (that was S.A.R.C.A.S.T.I.C., Steve).
>>     But honestly, you've posted such ridiculous ideas of biology
>>recently that I'm having problems deciding which is most outrageous.

>   I feel sorry for you... YOu're about to be disproved. I am well
>versed in the cyclical nature of pregnancy which is referred to as the
>"gestation period" insinuating a repeating nature of the gestation of the
>fetus. In other words, a predictable nature to the gestation cycle results
>in a consistent gestation period. 
     Incredible. I teach college English, but I've never seen a more
garbled sentence which says less in my life. Try using short sentences,
Steve--unless this little venture into doublespeak is an attempt to
eclipse the fact that you have no idea what you're talking about.
>  My points are not outrageous or ridiculous my friend. THe fault is
>with you interpretation.
>   
With both "me" interpretation and the dictionary interpretation. And
that wouldn't be me you're addressing as "friend," would it?
 steve

>-- 
>aasdSteveFranklin-Subliminal Psychology Major.ks;dlasBlueJaysRULEkasdfeahsdbfl
>sd;lfaswoq[eBuyMeAQuadra!!!mbnZMXCNdfsba;KdSPAMiuroqiyetIBMSuxiweuryth'ewr;mxn
>qpuepriuPartyOneqtuj;,n.,xnc,kjasFlameMeNot!;lkj;lkgkjd;askElvisLivesjhfquweru
>zx.cfranklin@ug.cs.dal.ca,sk;t;lrut[Superboy@ac.dal.cav.zx,Physics!eq3rwkh;oH

iHumpty Dumpty lives, and his name is Steve.
                        
                                MP  
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: darcy's hypocrisy (was Re: Dennis Hall posts private E-mail!)
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 01:45:26 GMT

In article <1992Apr12.164407.27627@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> kcochran@isis.cs.du.edu (Keith A. Cochran) writes:
>In article <1992Apr11.131143.6874@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>>
>>In other words, you are realigning yourself with the official, orthodox,
>>TSAKC party line that my criticisms of Susan Garvin are motivated by a 
>>net.vendetta, right?
>>
>>Whew! What a relief! Can't have any heresies or schisms in the TSAKC ranks,
>>now can we...
>
>No, Kevi-pooh, he's admitting that HE MADE A MISTAKE.  

Yeah, I could just hear that humility and contrition BEAMING RIGHT OUT when 
he said oops sorry he mistook my net.vendetta for misogyny. Hope he didn't 
sprain anything important kneeling and grovelling like that.

Methinks apologies are NOT Mr. Keegan's forte'...

								- Kevin
From: franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Hypocrisy, Bloody Hypocrisy
Date: 14 Apr 92 12:02:25 GMT
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

In <1992Apr13.214208.9678@odin.corp.sgi.com> cj@eno.corp.sgi.com (C J Silverio) writes:

>Please tell me two things:
>1. What do you think "responsible sex" is?
>   - sex with birth control?
>   - sex with the intent of procreation?
>   - sex without a penis contacting a vagina?
>   - masturbation (mutual or otherwise)?
   Not necessarily sex with the intent of procreation, but an awareness
that WITH sex comes the POSSIBILITY of procreation which you must nurture
and accomadate to the extent of your means. Nowhere within this compliance
must you at any time contemplate the termination of your unborn child.
THIS is responsible sex.

>2. Why should your sexual opinions have anything
>   to do with me?
   Well... Mine work. Yours don't 8)
You see, I can claim that my way causes no abortions, no need for 
contraceptives (cheaper!), no concern of STD's, and my honeymoon
will be a HELLUVA lot more unique for me than yours is/was. Sounds
like a good deal to me. Awhh come on cj... why not try it MY way for 
a bit?
   steve
-- 
aasdSteveFranklin-Subliminal Psychology Major.ks;dlasBlueJaysRULEkasdfeahsdbfl
sd;lfaswoq[eBuyMeAQuadra!!!mbnZMXCNdfsba;KdSPAMiuroqiyetIBMSuxiweuryth'ewr;mxn
qpuepriuPartyOneqtuj;,n.,xnc,kjasFlameMeNot!;lkj;lkgkjd;askElvisLivesjhfquweru
zx.cfranklin@ug.cs.dal.ca,sk;t;lrut[Superboy@ac.dal.cav.zx,Physics!eq3rwkh;oHA
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis)
Subject: Re: The March in D.C.
Reply-To: mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 23:09:32 GMT


In a previous article, judi@wam.umd.edu (Jay T Stein -- too baudy for my modem) says:

>>Women must realize that
>>one of their great gifts is their ability to CREATE. We must thank women
>>for this, and heighten our support and admiration of the mother. It is
>>society's fault and it is now society's resonsibility to help all women
>>through their pregnancies and beyond. 
>
>These are laudable goals, Steve - but I have my doubts as to whether we'll
>be able to accomplish them.  If and when we do, *then* we can talk about
>outlawing abortion.

with attitudes like this, then why try????

Why is it that noone ever tries to end all the "unwanted pregnancies?"

The majority of pro-lifers wouldn't have a problem with this, except
for the Catholic ones. Sure, abortion is a quick and easy solution.
But the straight line path between 2 points is not always the
easiest route to travel.

BTW, this group is cool. I feel that even though we all have differences,
at least we don't scream as loud as people on the streets. Sure, it's
nice to be caustic. But I respect everyone's decency here. I pray
that someday we will all find a suitable solution<----unlikely if
we look at our flaws in society and history.
But if we are to find a solution to this issue, everyone must realize
that there are no absolutes. 

"Man is a species very limited in perception in the space-time 
continuum and the future." -  Star Trek: The New Generation

Later dayz

-- 
MaThiEu a. LeWis   "Achtung ya'll........it's good to be down in America
Thieves Like Us     for a while....and get to Texas.....I'll have a drink
mal11@po.cwru.edu   on Texas."  - U2  Dallas, Texas  April 5th, 1992 
                   I LIKE TO WATCH THINGS ON ZOO TV
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis)
Subject: Re: Mommy! They Called Me Names! (Was: Implications of Abortion...)
Reply-To: mal11@po.CWRU.Edu (Matthew A. Lewis)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 00:05:42 GMT


In a previous article, kcochran@isis.cs.du.edu (Keith A. Cochran) says:

>This from somebody who has just admitted he's 19.  Hire a teenage while they
>still know everything...
>
>Somebody who is 19 and trying to tell women how to run their lives?  The one
>who "can see the fetus as the child"???
>



gee......all you "much wiser" adults have shown everyone that YOU 
know everything.

Please, name one problem besides fixing the lawn mower that you have
fixed in you lifetime?


-- 
MaThiEu a. LeWis   "Achtung ya'll........it's good to be down in America
Thieves Like Us     for a while....and get to Texas.....I'll have a drink
mal11@po.cwru.edu   on Texas."  - U2  Dallas, Texas  April 5th, 1992 
                   I LIKE TO WATCH THINGS ON ZOO TV
Newsgroups: talk.abortion