HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nadja@jetsun.weitek.COM (Nadja Adolf)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,soc.motts,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Yes on 9 (was Re: William F. Buckley opposes anti-gay ballot measure)
Date: 2 Oct 92 23:58:47 GMT
Organization: WEITEK Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <6405@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca> king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King) writes:
>In article <Sep.30.20.07.12.1992.5604@romulus.rutgers.edu> kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu (Theodore A. Kaldis) writes:
>>I just want to take this opportunity to announce that if I were an
>>Oregon voter, I would vote "YES" on Prop. 9

>Since you are not an Oregonite, and probably have never been any closer
>than a sprig of Oregono, you are not qualified to have an opinion in the
>matter. I bet that precious few people really give a damn about what you
>think, anyway, Teddie. 

Those of us from Oregon call ourselves Oregonians. Even if we have
since moved to another state. The thought of Teddy Bear Bundy KKKaldis
moving to Oregon gives me nightmares. Think of it... a green, grassy,
hillside in the Willamette Valley where sheep safely graze, protected
from stray dogs and coyotes by the presence of burros and llamas. And then,
clad in a wolf costume, holding his flaccid organ in his hand, Teddy 
stalks these soft, fluffy, sweet animals with rape on his mind... 

-- 
The Earth Pig Bourne....

nadja@node.com (prefered email address)
nadja@weitek.com
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: caz@owlnet.rice.edu (HWRNMNBSOL)
Subject: Re: Please don't flame me!
Organization: Rice University
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 03:56:42 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.213518.1@acad.drake.edu>, vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
|> Guys, I'm new to all this, and I think that we should stop flaming everyone
|> because feelings could get hurt... let's all stop our anger and love each other
|> (platonically, of course) for the people that we are.

*I* love you.

I love your soft, fleshy mantits.

I love your Rorshach-pattern sweat-stains.

I love your Spiderman Underoos.

I love your annoying, high-pitched, whinnying laugh.

I love the way you blush when you compare homework with a member of the 
  opposite sex and get the same answers.

I love the way you trip over your own feet for no reason.

I love your fetid breath, morning, noon and night.

I love how your hands are always coated with a thin layer of Vaseline.

I love the way you open your mouth while chewing and smack loudly.

I love how you pick your nose and eat the boogers when you think nobody
  is looking.

I especially love it when you brake too fast while bicycling and fall
  forward onto the bar, and you get that wrenching, nauseous feeling
  in your bloated gut.

In short, my friend, I love every square hectare of your greasy, pimply
   skin.  I want to twist up rubber bands and release them in your hair.

Die Slowly.  In Public.



  Everybody's Pal,

                       HWRNMNBSOL
From: aephel01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: <None>
Date: 2 Oct 92 12:57:44 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <5-#vH-ms+9@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
> In article <BvGtEz.3D2@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>>In article <gh#vHyzf+9@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>>
>>[nothing of any importance]
>>
>>Wake me up when you have something to say.  Now go back to your babysitting.
> 
> O.K., asshole.  I'm programming in C.  C Programming != babysitting.  You
> appear to have been misinformed.  It appears that nothing has changed since 9
> August 1992.  Not surprising.

Oooooooooooooooooooooh, C programming!  What a professional.
How about this...


  type
     Bufalini : asshole
        OOGLE : fart

Your oogles smell like your stinking breath.

> --
> Bruce A. Bufalini (bufalini@gis.psu.edu)|"And The Meek Shall Inherit The Earth."
> PSU Geographic Information Systems      |
>                                         |        -Neil Peart, 1976

  Hey Bruce, Rush tells us                     I think Neil would like you
  we're here because we're here, but           to acknowledge the *TRUE*
  why is a peabrained shithead asswipe         author of this quote, or do
  like you here?                               you truly beleive he said
                                               it first.  Go roll your
                                               fuckin' bones dip wad.

-- no sig necessary --
       Aza
From: robinson@PSYVAX.PSY.UTEXAS.EDU (John G. Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Bruce Bufalini doesn't require repair (was Re: Bruce Bufalini requires everyone to OGGLE)
Date: 2 Oct 92 16:46:26 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin

OK, so I'm paging through the articles, when all of a sudden...

In article <5-#vH-ms+9@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Bruce
A Bufalini) writes:
> 
> O.K., asshole.  I'm programming in C.  C Programming != babysitting.  You
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jesus jumping Christ, it's a SELF-REPLICATING VIRUS!  Not only that, it's
confident enough to come onto Usenet and announce itself.  Soon all the
newsgroups will be filled with OGGLEs inserted by thousands of Bufalini
clones.  It seems the 'net's days are numbered...

> --
> Bruce A. Bufalini (bufalini@gis.psu.edu)|"And The Meek Shall Inherit The Earth."

Oh well, maybe my worry is premature.  The poor thing can't even count to
80...

**********
John G. Robinson
robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bufalini@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Bruce A Bufalini)
Subject: Rush rules
Reply-To: bufalini@gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 92 20:03:37 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.085744.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> aephel01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>In article <5-#vH-ms+9@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>> In article <BvGtEz.3D2@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>>>In article <gh#vHyzf+9@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>>>
>>>[nothing of any importance]
>>>
>>>Wake me up when you have something to say.  Now go back to your babysitting.
>> 
>> O.K., asshole.  I'm programming in C.  C Programming != babysitting.  You
>> appear to have been misinformed.  It appears that nothing has changed since 9
>> August 1992.  Not surprising.
>
>Oooooooooooooooooooooh, C programming!  What a professional.
>How about this...
>
>
>  type
>     Bufalini : asshole
>        OOGLE : fart
>
>Your oogles smell like your stinking breath.

Aza, you appear to be an idiot of immense proportions.  Your brain capacity
appears to be equivalent to that of an icecube.

>>Bruce A Bufalini (bufalini@gis.psu.edu)|"And The Meek Shall Inherit The Earth.
>>PSU Geographic Information Systems     |
>>                                       |        -Neil Peart, 1976
>
>  Hey Bruce, Rush tells us                     I think Neil would like you
>  we're here because we're here, but           to acknowledge the *TRUE*
>  why is a peabrained shithead asswipe         author of this quote, or do
>  like you here?                               you truly beleive he said
>                                               it first.  Go roll your
>                                               fuckin' bones dip wad.

How would you know what Neil wants?  Did you ask him?  No, for Neil wouldn't
associate himself with a loser like yourself.  Obtain facts before making
unwarranted extrapolations.

I am here on a mission to inform the misinformed, which I see you are.


--
Bruce A Bufalini (bufalini@gis.psu.edu)|"And The Meek Shall Inherit The Earth."
PSU Geographic Information Systems      |
                                        |        -Neil Peart, 1976
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Clinton Appeals to Hate
Date: 28 Sep 92 18:49:01 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson in North America.
              The opinions expressed are strictly those of the user and
              not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1992Sep28.162205.26063@umbc3.umbc.edu> alex@red-dragon.umbc.edu (alex) writes:
>From: alex@red-dragon.umbc.edu (alex)
>Subject: Re: Clinton Appeals to Hate
>Date: 28 Sep 92 16:22:05 GMT

>In article <BvAH8F.Fxz@apollo.hp.com>, nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson) writes:

>|> >Zeroing the deficit does not get rid of the debt, it just stops the 
>|> >debt from getting bigger.
>|> 
>|>    This isn't true.  Part of the budget is payments on current debt,
>|>    so a balanced budget would still be paying down debt, and over time 
>|>    the national debt would be paid off.    A "balanced budget" simply
>|>    means that your revenues match your disbursements.   That some of
>|>    those disbursements are for exiting debt is immaterial.

Yes it is most certainly true.  Zeroing the deficit on a given year does not 
get rid of the debt.  Not in and of itself, anyway.

Now if part of the budget pays principal, but the budget is still 
over income, then you are robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Even if you do pay more than you overspend, you will still owe interest on
the outstanding balance, until the balance is zero.

So, your analysis was at best oversimplified.  But given only the changes 
you stated, you could not make us debt free anytime soon.

>        Correct, but misleading. The National Debt is typically in the 
>form of 30 year treasury bonds, so the only piece of the debt being paid
>off is the part that is 30 years old, or the part that was sold on shorter
>terms. Since most (3/4) of the debt is not 12 years old, you still have
>a $210B deficit this year, which more then offsets the small amount of
>debt repayment. Net result: the debt is still growing.

>        Your move.

I think what he needs to do is show a little better detail about his plan, 
as the discussion has been going back and forth and he pulls out something 
new at each corner.  I'd like to see the whole thing laid out.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "This must be Thursday.  I never could get the hang of Thursdays"
                                                       - Douglas Adams
  - Patrick Taylor                                       (Arthur Dent)
    Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                       "Don't let the .se fool you"
    or exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org, exu.exuptr@memo.ericsson.se
From: aephel01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Quayle and Lawyers
Date: 2 Oct 92 13:15:31 GMT
Followup-To: talk.politics.misc
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <Oct.2.07.18.26.1992.28614@romulus.rutgers.edu>, 
                                k*ld*s@romulus.rutgers.edu (K*ld*s) writes:
> In article <1992Oct2.000158.7058@Princeton.EDU> 
                      pswanson@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Paul Swanson) writes:
>> If you aren't going to try and be logical you might as well just stop
>> posting now.
> 
> Because logical people generally don't post to the net.

        What kind of reasoning is this?  And all this time I thought
you were just a legend of stupidity.  But really do say stupid shit!
And come across like you're serious.

I will never again doubt your stupidty.

-- no sig necessary --
       Aza
From: terje@light.fipnet.fi (Terje Bergstrom)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Sex ed in schools?
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 1992 09:34:12 GMT
Organization: Fipnet - Espoo, SF
X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00 beta rel2

In article <103.5692@okys.infoserv.com>, Rene Madsen writes:

> If you like to pay for other peoples waste of money I suggest you move
> to Scandinavia (any country there will do). They have a huge deficite
> because of the state's willingness to pay for other peoples lack of

  In Finland, an average family has two children. Do you call that a huge
deficite?


  Terje Bergstr|m           Internet:   terje@light.fipnet.fi
  Jukolanahde 4 D 15        FidoNet:    2:220/550.3
  02180 Espoo
  Finland
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy,talk.abortion
From: nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos)
Subject: Re: Did someone ask about misogynist pro-life loons?
Organization: USC  Department of Computer Science
Date:  1 Oct 92 00:47:45 GMT

In <1992Sep24.011755.2709@jetsun.weitek.COM> nadja@jetsun.weitek.COM (Nadja Adolf) writes:

>In article <czbzb3b@rpi.edu> keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
>>kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran) writes:
>>>Gee, is this the same Kevin who saw an ambigous statment from Susan Garvin,
>>>tried to use it to attack her and her loved ones?

>>no. this is the same kevin darcy who saw an ambigous
>>statement from susan garvin and did use it to attack
>>her and her loved ones.

>That was an attack? I thought it was a tantrum. 

Since Kevin Darcy helped me eliminate the one trumped-up charge 
against Suzanne that had any bite to it, I will return the favor
and require of y'all, especially Sledovatel Cochran, that you produce the
evidence.

Peter Nyikos

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: dennisp@kpc.com (Dennis Preston)
Subject: Re: Please don't flame me!
Organization: Kubota Pacific Computer Inc, Santa Clara, CA
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 15:47:51 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.213518.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>Guys, I'm new to all this, and I think that we should stop flaming everyone
>because feelings could get hurt... let's all stop our anger and love each other
>(platonically, of course) for the people that we are.

Yer serious?!! Why would we *not* want to flame a wet-nosed, snivveling,
_sensitive_ (HA!) sorry excuse for wasting flesh person who would post
that drivel here? ----next!

Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: You want me to put your *WHAT* in my mouth? (Was: Some bird thing...)
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 04:13:58 GMT

nadja@jetsun.weitek.COM (Nadja Adolf) writes:
->james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
->>kevin is much more accomplished than that! ask him to
->>tell you how he is one of only two persons to be voted
->>in as a member of the council of net.idiots.

->Keegan, when I left the net 18 mos. ago you were on this thread. Who is
->the bigger idiot - someone who makes the council of net.idiots, or
->someone who bothers to argue with a member of the council?

goodness. no one has ever characterized my exchanges with
kebbie as 'argue' before. you have been away a long time.

and here i always thought you believed in taking a
historical perspective.

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
Subject: Re: Need Thum Advithe
Organization: QQQCLC
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 19:37:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.142033.25128@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> darice@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Fred Rice) writes:
>I need thum advithe.  Believe it or not, I unfortunately tend to thometimes
>thpeak with a lithp, and many people make fun of my unfortunate thituation.  
>How can prevent people making fun of the way I thpeak in the future?
>
>Looking forward to all your pothitive thuggestions.

	Well, normally I'd tell someone with your problem to use written
communication whenever possible.

	Doesn't look like it would help in your case, though.

						Kayembee
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Bruce requires surgical removal.
Summary: Bruce requires a Drano enema. 
Keywords: Bruce is wasting time on the job.
Organization: Over there, between the hedges. 
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 01:43:16 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.040650.9232@athena.cs.uga.edu> milliken@athena.cs.uga.edu (Brewmeister) writes:
>In article <BvH2EH.5rB@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>>In article <5-#vH-ms+9@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>>>In article <BvGtEz.3D2@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>>>>In article <gh#vHyzf+9@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>>>>
>>>>[nothing of any importance]
>>>>
>>>>Wake me up when you have something to say.  Now go back to your babysitting.
>>>
>>>O.K., asshole.  It appears that nothing has changed since 9 August 1992. 
>>>Not surprising.
>>
>>Indeed it hasn't.  You're still as clueless a git as ever -- except now
>>you're defrauding the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania by being paid to work,
>>and posting *this* dreck instead...
>>
>>(the ineptly forged address was almost interesting, though. :-)
>>
>>--PLH (If I sold clues to Bruce at a nickel a pop, I could retire at age
>>38...)
>>
>>
>>-- 
>
>Whoa, Nellie!  Did I miss something?  Bruce has a job?

So he says, anyway...

-- 
Patrick L. Humphrey  (patrick@is.rice.edu)  Rice Networking & Computing Systems
     +1 713 528-3626 at Rice. 776-1541 at home. 667-6554 at Palace Lanes. 
             The opinions presented herein are *mine*, not Rice's.     
  (Except for this one:  BEAT THE *&^%$#@! OUTTA TEXAS!!! We both share that.)
From: king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Bruce Bufalini, braindead
Keywords: Bofo has no brain
Date: 5 Oct 92 12:19:16 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine

In article <5-#vH-ms+9@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
> ... It appears that nothing has changed since 9 August 1992.  Not surprising.

Yeah, right. You were an asshole and a waster of bandwidth then, as you
prove yourself to be now. Nothing has changed. PSU idiots remain a dime a
dozen.

>"And The Meek Shall Inherit The Earth."
>   -Neil Peart, 1976

Fool. Are you trying to tell us that Peart plagarized? Are you truly as big
an airhead as those other Rush fans I sometimes see on the streets (usually
unemployable and/or uneducatable greasy pimply morons drooling and
shuffling their feet listlessly)? Did you know that one of Peart's
favourite bands is the Rheostatics, lead by a friend of mine, the
journalist Dave Bedini? Did you know that Peart laughs at the likes of you
because of your adolescent musical attitude? He laughs loudly, all the
way to the bank.

-- 
                       Se non e` vero, e` ben trovato 
     ...{utzoo|mnetor}!dciem!dretor!king        king@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mhopper@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Mark Hopper)
Subject: Re: fuck you all
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1992 20:22:34 GMT

In article <1992Sep23.133604.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au> c8643631@cc.newcastle.edu.au (DUCK DODGERS) writes:
>Regarding black people's use of the word 'nigger' about themselves:
>
>a) they've got the right to call themselves anything they want. It is not a
>term of abuse which it can only be when white poeple use it.
>
>b) Ice-T calls himself a 'Straight-Up Nigga' 'cause 'everybody is a nigga to a
>nigga'. Black people co-opting the term for themselves means that white people
>can't use it as a form of abuse. Would the term 'you human' be a term of abuse
>against anyone? No. Everybody's human. Everybody calls themselves human. It
>can't be a term of abuse. If all black people called themselves 'niggas' then
>nobody would ever be able to use it as a term of abuse again.
>
  Does this mean that black people think of everyone as niggers?
  Perhaps we could end all insults or verbal abuse by constantly
  verbally abusing ourselves... Excellent concept.
From: milliken@athena.cs.uga.edu (Brewmeister)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Flame Away!
Date: 5 Oct 92 04:20:22 GMT
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens

In article <1992Oct2.210018.1429@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>> jaholmes@ee.WPI.EDU (Jennifer Holmes) writes:
>>Well I think you guys are a bunch of assholes, how does that sound
>
>well, jennifer, (our is that genifer?) youre right, we are all a bunch
>of assholes. after this promising beginning, tho, your post degenerated
>so rapidly it doesnt even make good flame bait. so, there can only be
>two reasons for your sudden desire to unlurk:
>
>1) you are dumb. but we already knew that, and its probably not enough to
>get you to post.
>
>2) you are horny, and are hoping some horndog computer nerd will get so
>turned on by the idea of a girl that cusses on the net that he will email
>you, youll meet, and hell fuck your brains out and you can live a happy
>geeky life together.
>
>However, jenifer, you are out of luck, mainly because you are so ugly
>I wouldnt fuck you with my dog's dick.
>
>nothing personal,
>rob

Ya know, you have to wonder about a guy who uses a girl's name three times
in a post, and manages to misspell it twice.
-- 
Copy this .sig and just say noe to big-brother's monitoring of public bandwidth
*Bush Quayle conspiracy JFK cocaine LSD heroin marijuana AK-47 Iran Iraq Libya*
*Sandinista Contras Panama Noriega FBI CIA NSA Secret Service fixed-elections *
*Neil Bush S&L coverup potatoe wiretaps search & seizure bill of rights dead  *
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: esp51@cas.org ()
Subject: Re: Please don't flame me!
Organization: Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 19:51:21 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.213518.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>Guys, I'm new to all this, and I think that we should stop flaming everyone
>because feelings could get hurt... let's all stop our anger and love each other
>(platonically, of course) for the people that we are.

   Pretty good bait.  But not origional.  During my travels through
alt.peeves, I have blundered upon several ways to get the
"shit flamed out of you".

1.  First, for no reason at all, flame the shit out of someone.
2.  When return flames are posted, attempt to retract your previous
    flame.  (this is know as "back peddeling" or "loss of testicular
    mass", and invites major flamage.
3.  Complaining about political or phylosophical issues without
    concluding that the solution to said issues is to get a gun
    and kill kill kill.
4.  When making ridiculous statements like #3, do so in an omniscent
    authoritative preachy manner like #4.
5.  Backing down from positions, even if arrived at during a moment
    of boredome induced insanity. (see #2)

   There are of course more blatant methods, but these seem to work
   for me.

   Scott

   I am not spokesman for my company.
From: dennisp@kpc.com (Dennis Preston)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Flame Away!
Date: 2 Oct 92 22:35:29 GMT
Organization: Kubota Pacific Computer Inc, Santa Clara, CA

In article <1992Oct2.210018.1429@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>> jaholmes@ee.WPI.EDU (Jennifer Holmes) writes:
>>Well I think you guys are a bunch of assholes, how does that sound


But did you beat that  Child rap yet? ;-> *evil grin*
A

>
>well, jennifer, (our is that genifer?) youre right, we are all a bunch
>of assholes. after this promising beginning, tho, your post degenerated
>so rapidly it doesnt even make good flame bait. so, there can only be
>two reasons for your sudden desire to unlurk:
>
>1) you are dumb. but we already knew that, and its probably not enough to
>get you to post.
>
>2) you are horny, and are hoping some horndog computer nerd will get so
>turned on by the idea of a girl that cusses on the net that he will email
>you, youll meet, and hell fuck your brains out and you can live a happy
>geeky life together.
>
>However, jenifer, you are out of luck, mainly because you are so ugly
>I wouldnt fuck you with my dog's dick.
>
>nothing personal,
>rob
>
>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Trivia,so ignore if serious.
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 20:53:49 GMT


>Betcha This gets flamed for no reason!

No reason? YOU post this super-masturbatory star trek crap on alt.flame, and
you say NO reason?
>

>
>   PICARD- RIKER  '92 !
>


Looks like a good reason to flame to me, you worthless sack of shit star
trek nerd of a virgin. god, do yourself a favor and get out of the house
a little more. really.


Newsgroups: alt.flame