From: mchaffee@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (REAL LIFE?!?!  HA!!)
Subject: Re: "HIV-infected molest suspect outrages town"
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 07:20:37 GMT

cramer@optilink.COM (Clayton Cramer) writes:

>In article <1992Dec9.210000.7785@udel.edu>, carroll@oin.cis.udel.edu (Mark C. Carroll) writes:
># For example, in your supposed proofs, you claim that anyone who ever
># has any sexual contact with a member of their own sex is homosexual.
># Then, you use this assertion to create a supposed number of homosexual
># child abusers. Then, you compare this number of a lower-bound estimate
># of the number of fully homosexual men, and come up with a very large
># percentage.
># 
># But there are two different definition of homosexuality in that "proof":
># 
>#   Definition 1: A homosexual is anyone who has any sexual contact with
>#      with his/her own sex. (Used to generate the supposed number of
>#      homosexual molesters)
># 
>#   Definition 2: A homosexual is anyone who has sexual contact 
>#      *exclusively* with members of his/her own sex. (Used to generate
>#      the supposed percentage of homosexual molesters.)

>No, a homosexual is anyone who has sexual contact with members of
>his/her own sex.  No requirement for exclusivity.

Now Clayton, you're doing it again.....If every person who has had sexual con-
tact with motss is gay, then Masters and Johnson, I believe, says that by that
definition, about 35% of the population is gay.  Coincidentally, about 35% of
child molesters have had contact with adult motss.  However, when you argue
that homosexuals are disproportionately represented among the evil ranks of
child molesters, you say 35% of child molesters are gay and only 4% of people
in general are gay.  Doesn't compute.  Give it up.  Do you realize they have
started making fun of you on rec.humor?  Yer famous, buddy!

BTW, while I have your attention, were you molested as a child?  Now, according
to your beautifully-supported, well-written, and largely worthless posting on
the connection between homosexuals and child molesting, one reason you think it
is safe to assume that most gays have been molested is that they deny having
been molested.  Did you deny having been molested?  Hmmm.....

Tell us a few other things, Clayton.  What do you look like?  Are you svelte
and pretty?  Or are you a bit pudgy?  If so, I bet you have an eating disorder
which must be a result of being molested.

We have been molested because we pierce our ears, noses, nipples, etc., right?
Do you find pleasure in consistently insulting a group of people who have the
sense to realize (and blatantly state) that you are trash?  I think you are
causing pain to yourself because you were molested as a child.

There you have it, folks.  I have proven, using Our Hero Clayton's OWN "LOGIC"
that he was molested as a child.  Don't try to deny it Clayton, we know better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael T. Chaffee        | mchaffee@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu  |  ______    
                                                       |  \    /   HATE
"I chased a rainbow down a one-way street.  Dead end." |   \  /  is not a
     - S. P. McCall                                    |    \/  FAMILY VALUE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc