HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hanst@htsa.aha.nl (Hans Trompert)
Subject: Re: Problems with sendmail/smail on Sequent
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:44:56 GMT
Organization: Hogeschool van Amsterdam, The Netherlands, E.E. & C.S. Dept.
Keywords: smail, sendmail, sequent, symmetry
Summary: Sendmail and smail problems on a Sequent Symmetry

In article <1993Jan18.142006.690@cca.vu.nl> valke@cca.vu.nl (Peter Valkenburg) writes:
>We are having problems with getting sendmail to work on a Sequent running
>Dynix V3.0.17.9 (definitely not the newest release; it's dated Jan 1990).
>Some experienced Dynix-administrators told we probably won't get sendmail
>to run properly under Dynix anyway -- it's buggy.

I've had the same problem. I tried to use sendmail with our generic
sendmail.cf which we use on our Sequent Balance 8000 and all our
HP9000/[78]?? machines, but got stuck on the rebuild of the aliasfile,
it always complaint that the users weren't local to this machine.
I suspect the shadow password routines are messing things up (we are
running PTX 1.4.0).

>So I pulled out smail (PD package) and tried that.  It just does about
>everything, except for MX records.  When I run smail in debug mode and feed
>it an address for which it needs to get an MX record, it will do so but NOT
>take the hint it gets for a domain's mail host.

And so did we. We installed smail and tried to add add some MX records
which point to our domain-mail-master, but this confused our
domain-mail-master in such a way that I had to remove the MX records
again. I now use a small shell script (with the queryprogram driver)
as temporary solution.

I know that this isn't the solution you were hoping for, but maybe
this is a hint for the smail developpers that there may be something
wrong with the bind driver.

Regards,
	HansT (hanst@htsa.aha.nl).

-- 
# Hans Trompert, Europaboulevard 23, 1079 PC  Amsterdam, Holland
# hanst@htsa.aha.nl, Voice: (+31)20-6429333, Fax: (+31)20-6443215
# No silicon heaven ? Preposterous ! Where would all the calculators go ?
#                                            ----- Kryten - Red Dwarf III
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.unix.aix
From: woan@exeter.austin.ibm.com (Ronald S. Woan)
Subject:  I want to be able to use MX records on IBM AIX
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 23:44:31 GMT
Reply-To: woan@cactus.org
Organization: Austin School of Hardknocks

In article <1993Jan26.195437.25987@athena.mit.edu> herrera@athena.mit.edu (Ramon F Herrera) writes:
>I have an IBM RS/6000 with AIX 3.2 and I am running the mailer daemon
>that comes in the distribution tape.  However, this 'sendmail' is
>unable to deal with MX records.  How can I set it up in order to be
>able to use such records??

edit /etc/sendmail.cf (they have comments that describe the various
stanzas) and then run sendmail -bz?

-- 
+-----All Views Expressed Are My Own And Are Not Necessarily Shared By------+
+------------------------------My Employer----------------------------------+
+ Ronald S. Woan                       woan@cactus.org or woan@vnet.ibm.com +
+ other email addresses             Prodigy: XTCR74A Compuserve: 73530,2537 +
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.unix.aix
From: herrera@athena.mit.edu (Ramon F Herrera)
Subject: I want to be able to use MX records on IBM AIX
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:54:37 GMT

I have an IBM RS/6000 with AIX 3.2 and I am
running the mailer daemon that comes in the
distribution tape.  However, this 'sendmail' is
unable to deal with MX records.  How can I set
it up in order to be able to use such records??

thanks,

-Ramon Herrera

Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: johnd@snake.cs.uidaho.edu (John Dickinson)
Subject: sendmail.cf documentation
Organization: University of Idaho CS Dept.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:22:57 GMT
Reply-To: johnd@snake.cs.uidaho.edu (John Dickinson)


I have trouble reading sendmail.cf files :)

I would like suggestions on current and useful
documentation for sendmail configuration files.
Thanks.


John Dickinson
University of Idaho
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: davehieb@magi.rootgroup.com (David Hieb)
Subject: Timing statistics utility for mail messages
Originator: davehieb@rootgroup.com
Keywords: sendmail timing statistics
Reply-To: davehieb@magi.rootgroup.com (David Hieb)
Organization: The Root Group, Inc.
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 07:12:09 GMT


Does anyone know if a timing statistics utility exists that could
compute and report the time it takes a mail message to go from point A
to some point E, showing intermediate steps along the way? It would be
much more convenient than doing it manually and always having to
account for time-zone differences...  Output could be something like
the following:

Edge				Time
----------------------------------------
A	-> B			00:15:00
B	-> C			03:53:00
C	-> D			00:22:00
D	-> E			00:09:00

A	-> E			04:39:00

Thanks,

  --DRH
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: peter@cc.gatech.edu (Peter N. Wan)
Subject: More on IDA Sendmail 5.65c Prog Mailer not being Compatible
Followup-To: poster
Reply-To: peter@cc.gatech.edu (Peter N. Wan)
Organization: College of Computing, Georgia Tech
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 01:05:56 GMT
Expires: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 01:05:57 GMT

This is more info on my conversion to IDA Sendmail 5.65c on a Sparcstation
2 running SunOS 4.1.2.

I forgot to say that some of the other failures are for scripts that seem
to silently fail when they executed before; these scripts truncate and open
files in the user's (mostly locked, 0700 mode) directories.

As far as consistency goes, I am still getting "cannot create output" errors
for the users who just put a path in their .forward (the path goes into
locked/secured directories as well).
	Peter
-- 
Peter N. Wan (peter@cc.gatech.edu)		Georgia Institute of Technology
Computing and Networking Services		Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0280
College of Computing				(404) 894-4736
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: jls2@teal.csn.org (Jeff Stoner)
Subject: Host Hiding
Organization: Colorado SuperNet, Inc.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:44:35 GMT

How do I do host hiding...?

I.e., if I have hosts "foo.bar.com" and "snow.bar.com", how do I get them
to make outbound mail (mainly out of the domain bar.com) look like it's all
from "user@bar.com"...?

I'm suffering from a specific case of a host named "bar.bar.com" that's
a Sun registered on the Internet as "bar.com" and without an alias for
"bar.bar.com". And getting such an alias doesn't seem to be an option.
The mail it generates is from "user@bar.bar.com" and is unrepliable (is
that a word?!?!).

In a broader sense, I need to do this to HP's, Suns and DECs all running
the sendmail provided with each's operating system at near-current and
current revisions.

Thanks in advance!

-- 
====== Jeff L. Stoner === Boulder, Colo. ============ /\ = /\ ========== |
                                                 /\  /  \ /  /\  /\    --*--
   Home: jls2 @ bearhug.boulder.co.us         /\/  \/    /  /  \/  /\    |
   News: jls2 @ csn.org                    /\/  \   \  /\  /    \    /\
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: jroberts@beta.lanl.gov (Jack C. Roberts)
Subject: SunOs 4.1.1 sendmail MX problem
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 18:57:18 GMT


Client OS:      SunOS 4.1.1
Name Server OS: Ultrix2.4-C

Problem:
mr.xxx.yyy has been set up as a mail exchanger.  If I try to mail to
user@mr.xxx.yyy my sendmail on the sun tells me:

jack@mr.xxx.yyy... Never heard of host mr in domain xxx . yyy


Hints:
I use /etc/resolv.conf to resolve names.
A nslookup session follows

% /usr/etc/nslookup
Default Server:  slunix.xxx.yyy
Address:  129.58.#.##

> mr
Server:  slunix.xxx.yyy
Address:  129.58.#.##

Name:    mr.xxx.yyy


> set querytype=mx
> mr
Server:  slunix.xxx.yyy
Address:  129.58.#.##

mr.xxx.yyy      preference = 0, mail exchanger = saems.xxx.yyy
saems.xxx.yyy   inet address = 129.58.##.##


It seems to me that I need to tell sendmail that mr.xxx.yyy is a mail
exchanger so that when it does its nslookup it will have the querytype
set correctly.  I can't seem to find an option for sendmail.cf.  Does
anyone out there have a solution?  I have been working on this problem
off and on for over a week without success.


                                Thanks in advance,
                                jroberts@lanl.gov

Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: mcclure@viper.cs.unm.edu (Brent McClure)
Subject: what to do with <@a,@b,@c:u@h>
Organization: Computer Science Department, University of New Mexico
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 01:23:55 GMT

We are re-working our sendmail configuration, and our mail relay 
host currently attempts to route addresses of the form:

<@a,@b,@c:u@h> 

to "a", however from what I've been reading from several places 
it sounds like many sites are simply throwing away the source-route and
resolving straight to "u@h".  Is this the recommended practice
now and/or is there any harm in this?

thanks.
From: avolio@TIS.COM (Frederick M Avolio)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: Host Hiding
Date: 25 Jan 1993 13:37:15 GMT
Organization: Trusted Information Systems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: avolio@tis.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: gildor.tis.com

In article <C19wAB.HuK@csn.org>, jls2@teal.csn.org (Jeff Stoner) writes:
|> How do I do host hiding...?
...
|> In a broader sense, I need to do this to HP's, Suns and DECs all running
|> the sendmail provided with each's operating system at near-current and
|> current revisions.


I am assuming from this last comment that you don't want to touch
(much) the sendmail.cf on these client machines.  If that is the case,
you do need to modify them a bit so that all mail for the outside
world (at least) goes through one or more Mail Hubs which run a
sendmail.cf that you *are* willing to modify to handle this.

On the Mail Hub(s) you need to:

	Have an alias for everyone who might send mail out (since mail
	will come in to user@domain now).

	Modify the sendmail.cf to rewrite all mail to
	user@something.domain to be just user@domain.  Do this in
	the sendmail.cf mailer rewriting rules for the particular
	mailer.

We've found it best to run the same client sendmail.cf on all clients.

F
From: avolio@TIS.COM (Frederick M Avolio)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: problems with DEC sendmail
Date: 28 Jan 1993 13:54:23 GMT
Organization: Trusted Information Systems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: avolio@tis.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: gildor.tis.com

In article <1993Jan26.181829.5257@choreo.ca>, root@choreo.ca (Superuser) writes:
|> Greetings:
|> 
|> I am in the process of installing a DECstation 3100 for a user here, and we
|> need to set up sendmail.  I am a novice when it comes to this MTA, as I 
|> typically work with MMDF.
|> 
|> At any rate, when this user sends mail out to our local net, it is returned
|> from the MAILER-DAEMON with an error that it can't contact a machine called
|> mail.tcplocal.
|> 
|> The relay machine which Ultrix is trying to contact to route the mail is
|> mail.Choreo.CA.  How do I fix this?

1. It is trying to connect to host "mail" (which you set as your UUCP
and Name relay -- DNmail and DZmail).

2. It is trying to connect to "mail" via mailer tcplocal.

3. It cannot connect to or resolve the name "mail".

A quick fix might be to change "mail" to the FQN "mail.Choreo.CA" as
you have for your general purpose relay (or change DZmail and DNmail
to DZ$R and DN$R).

F
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert)
Subject: Re: Prog Mailer Under IDA Sendmail 5.65c not Compatible With Sun's?
Organization: Northern Illinois University
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 02:01:00 GMT

In article <1993Jan28.004111.11089@cc.gatech.edu> peter@cc.gatech.edu (Peter N. Wan) writes:
>
>Some folks are doing "| if ... ; then ... ; else ... ; fi" and you get
>"sh: syntax error at line 1: `end of file' unexpected" and "unknown
>mailer error 2" messages now (didn't used to before).
>
>I found and disabled "OB." so that the blanks in some of the command
>lines aren't being changed to ".", that seems to have fixed some of the
>problems.

The 'OB.' is the major significant difference from SunOS sendmail where
the prog mailer is concerned.  Both use /bin/sh as the delivery agent.
If removing the blank substitute has any effect, it is only because your
users have incorrectly defined their '.forward' entries.

 Wrong:
	| if ... ; then ... ; else ... ; fi

 Right:
	"| if ... ; then ... ; else ... ; fi"

or, even better:
	|" if ... ; then ... ; else ... ; fi"

That is, the programmatic address should be quoted in '.forward'.  A
program alias typically contains characters which are not permitted in
email addresses unless quoted with double quotes ("..").  Sendmail
removes this set of quotes before feeding the command to /bin/sh.

In article <1993Jan28.010556.11365@cc.gatech.edu> peter@cc.gatech.edu (Peter N. Wan) writes:
>
>I forgot to say that some of the other failures are for scripts that seem
>to silently fail when they executed before; these scripts truncate and open
>files in the user's (mostly locked, 0700 mode) directories.

I can't guess what if anything is happening here.  It is often wiser to
put complex commands into a shell script, and have the shell script invoked
by the alias.

>As far as consistency goes, I am still getting "cannot create output" errors
>for the users who just put a path in their .forward (the path goes into
>locked/secured directories as well).

If this didn't happen with SunOS, then SunOS must have weakened the
standard permissions checking.  If you set the files to mode 4600 you
should alleviate this problem.

Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: peter@cc.gatech.edu (Peter N. Wan)
Subject: Prog Mailer Under IDA Sendmail 5.65c not Compatible With Sun's?
Followup-To: poster
Summary: prog mailer not compatible with Sun Sendmail
Reply-To: peter@cc.gatech.edu (Peter N. Wan)
Organization: College of Computing, Georgia Tech
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:41:11 GMT
Expires: Thu, 11 Feb 1993 00:41:11 GMT

Hi there, I've just updated our mail server to run Sendmail 5.65c with
IDA enhancements.  Everything else (aliases, DBM files, etc.) seem to
work except for the 'prog' mailer.  It apparently is not compatible
with the Sun Sendmail one that we were running before (SunOS 4.1.2, no
MX).  Various .forward files that used to work are not bombing.

Some folks are doing "| if ... ; then ... ; else ... ; fi" and you get
"sh: syntax error at line 1: `end of file' unexpected" and "unknown
mailer error 2" messages now (didn't used to before).

I found and disabled "OB." so that the blanks in some of the command
lines aren't being changed to ".", that seems to have fixed some of the
problems.  Anyone seen this before, and can provide pointers on how to
remedy it?  As postmaster, my mailbox is getting full of bounces from
the few people who use this feature, who are on active mailing lists
(natch).

Thanks,
	Peter
-- 
Peter N. Wan (peter@cc.gatech.edu)		Georgia Institute of Technology
Computing and Networking Services		Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0280
College of Computing				(404) 894-4736
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: jos@bull.nl (Jos Vos)
Subject: Re: what to do with <@a,@b,@c:u@h>
Organization: Bull, P.O. Box 22859, NL-1100 DJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 10:09:04 GMT

mcclure@viper.cs.unm.edu (Brent McClure) writes:

>We are re-working our sendmail configuration, and our mail relay 
>host currently attempts to route addresses of the form:

><@a,@b,@c:u@h> 

>to "a", however from what I've been reading from several places 
>it sounds like many sites are simply throwing away the source-route and
>resolving straight to "u@h".  Is this the recommended practice
>now and/or is there any harm in this?

No and yes.  You should route to "a".  I'm not sure whether it's forbidden
to route to "h" directly (although I think it is), but it's certainly
wrong to give up when that does not succeed i.s.o. routing to "a" then.

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos@bull.nl>   (UUCP: ...!{uunet,mcsun,sun4nl}!nlbull!jos)
--    Bull Nederland NV, Product Support Unix, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Xref: sparky comp.mail.sendmail:3287 comp.unix.aix:13768
From: drake@drake.almaden.ibm.com (Sam Drake)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: I want to be able to use MX records on IBM AIX
Date: 28 Jan 93 08:48:10 GMT
Organization: IBM Almaden Research Center

In article <1993Jan26.195437.25987@athena.mit.edu> herrera@athena.mit.edu (Ramon F Herrera) writes:
>I have an IBM RS/6000 with AIX 3.2 and I am
>running the mailer daemon that comes in the
>distribution tape.  However, this 'sendmail' is
>unable to deal with MX records.  How can I set
>it up in order to be able to use such records??

Look at /usr/lib/sendmail.cf, and make sure that the setting for "OK" is
what you want.  The AIX sendmail can indeed use MX records, if OK is set
to request it.
From: walt@phoenix.oki.com (Walt Weber)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: sendmail is mis-routing
Date: 26 Jan 1993 16:18:27 GMT
Organization: Oki Advanced Products Division
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: walt@oki.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: phoenix.oki.com

In article <261@hitwr.HauppaugeNY.NCR.COM>, joeb@hitwr.HauppaugeNY.NCR.COM (Joe Beiter) writes:
|> 
|> I've always just set all my mail to my smart host with no problems.  Now 
|> I need to be able to route mail to and for a system called 'wtad' which is
|> a novell system running Pegasus.  There is a Charon gateway called 'cms'
|> which is the gateway for wtad.
|> 
|> If I send mail to user "joeb@wtad", the cms SMTP debug window shows a 
|> connection from my system, then gets a RCPT for wtad!joeb@cms and promptly
|> rejects it.

Joe -

We're using Charon 4.0 and Pegasus v2.3 in our network for email to and from
our Novell-based users, and the trick is this:

Charon expects to be handling email for MULTIPLE servers (even if you only
have one server), so it expects to see addresses of the form "user@servername"
in the SMTP dialog. So in your case, the mailer should resolv deliveries to
site "wtad" by connecting with "cms" and using "user@wtad" as the recipient
address.

Note also that charon does NOT accept bang-format or mixed-mode addressing. For
more information, check the Charon SMTP debug window on the console of cms.

...walt...

--
Walt Weber                            Oki Advanced Products Division
walt@oki.com                          Marlborough, MA
508-624-7000 x8637
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: lendl@cosy.sbg.ac.at (Otmar Lendl)
Subject: .forward files
Summary: why not put the in the spool area ?
Organization: University of Salzburg / Austria
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 20:44:06 GMT

I'm currently re-installing IDA-Sendmail (5.65c/1.4.4)
[ist this a stable version ?] and am considering digging into
the code to change the location of the .forward files.

I want to address the well-known problem that the mailserver
has to mount all home-dirs if .forward files are used.
A better place for these files is IMHO the mail-spool.
	* it's located on the mail-server
	* all clients have it mounted
The file-name could either be /var/spool/mail/user.forward or
/var/spool/mail/fowards/user.
File-permissions should be manageable: Same perms for the 
forward-dir as /tmp. [btw, what ARE the default permissions
for the spool dir ? and for /bin/mail ? SUID-root ? ]

Has anybody done this already ?
Is this considered a good idea ?
What traps should I expect ?

/Otmar

-- 
|Otmar Lendl (lendl@cosy.sbg.ac.at) | Student of CS & Math at Salzburg |
|Akademiestr. 15  A-5020 Salzburg   | University (Austria / Europe)    |
| Put the scrabble away Arthur, it won't save the human race !  Ford P.|
From: max@underg.ucf.org (Max Cray)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: sendmail Verification Suite?
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 09:30:20 CST
Organization: Underground Computing Foundation

als@kowari.cpsg.com.au (Anthony Shipman) writes:

> There is a test system in the Ease distribution for sendmail.  I have it
> separated out (with my own test cases) and can send you a copy.

Will you mail me a copy, too?

Thanks!

                                          -= Max =-

---------------------------------------------------------------------
               The ideal home computer is a network.
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: chucks@iplmail.orl.mmc.com (Chuck Strickland)
Subject: sendmail wont queue for later delivery
Keywords: 
 
Organization: Martin Marietta
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 14:09:14 GMT

environment;
 sun os 4.1.2. sendmail.mx using berkeley m4 macro package to generate
 sendmail.cf.

 My mail host is functioning as a MX server for several systems. these
 systems go on and off the net periodically. I thought that if sendmail
 could resolve the hostname but not connect to the host it would
 queue the message and deliver it later. but it does not queue. it returns
 the message with the error "Service unavailable".

 I understand that the action taken is based on the exit status of the mailer.
 that is if the mail returns a status that indicates the delivery could
 be performed later then it queues. Else it returns the mail as underliverable.
 
 Question is, how to I set the error status of the mailer or the action
 taken by sendmail.

 the mailer used is the tcpld in the m4 package for local final delivery.

 thanks for the help,

-- 
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
Malcolm C. Strickland                 Martin Marietta Missle Systems
chuck-strickland@orl.mmc.com          mail point 170    
Phone: 407-356-7437                   pobox 555837
Fax:   407-356-5482                   orlando florida 32855-5837
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
From: rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: Why somewhere?
Date: 23 Jan 93 16:26:15 GMT
Organization: Northern Illinois University

In article <y5NTXB10w165w@underg.ucf.org> max@underg.ucf.org (Max Cray) writes:
>

>From uucp@uu2.psi.com   Fri Jan 22 05:38:28 1993 remote from somewhere

>Why 'somewhere'? Where does this come from? Why not a specific

The 'somewhere' is probably being added by your 'rmail'.  [Do a 'strings'
on 'rmail' to see if you can find this string.]

Rmail needs to find the sender address.  It looks in the "From " line
at the top of the message.  It is expectin
either

	From address date/time/info remote from host

or

	From host!address date/time/info

Instead it found "From user@host ..." which it does not understand.  Thus
it invented the hostname of 'somewhere'.

Your real problem is with the host from which you are receiving these
messages.  It is not meeting the UUCP standards for the "From " line.
There are newer versions of 'rmail' which may help solve the problem,
although strictly speaking it is not your problem.
From: cja@castle.ed.ac.uk (C Adie)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.multi-media
Subject: DISTRIBUTED MULTIMEDIA SURVEY
Summary: Available now!
Date: 27 Jan 93 10:50:04 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University


                      SURVEY OF NETWORKED MULTIMEDIA
                      ------------------------------

The survey of distributed multimedia comissioned by RARE, for which
information was solicited recently, has been completed.  The final
survey report is called:

"A Survey of Distributed Multimedia Research, Standards and Products",
First Edition, 25 January 1993. 

The final report contains responses received up to 22 January 1993.  It
is over 150 pages long, and contains information on over 50 research
projects, 40 standards and 35 products. 

By agreement with the chair of the RARE Multimedia Working Group, the
survey report is now available by anonymous ftp.  It may be found on:

           ftp.ed.ac.uk         129.215.146.5

in directory

           pub/mmsurvey

in files:

 mmsurvey.doc         Word for Windows 2 document (binary)
 mmsurvey.doc.Z       Compressed Word for Windows 2 document (binary)
 mmsurvey.ps          Postscript of document (ascii)
 mmsurvey.ps.Z        Compressed postscript of document (binary)
 mmsurvey.txt         Text form of document (ascii)
 mmsurvey.txt.Z       Compressed text form of document (binary)

Chris Adie                                   Phone:  +44 31 650 3363
Edinburgh University Computing Service       Fax:    +44 31 662 4809
University Library, George Square            Email:  C.J.Adie@edinburgh.ac.uk
Edinburgh EH8 9LJ, United Kingdom