HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: SURGDM@mizzou1.missouri.edu (Diane)
Subject: Mating Genes..(was Credibility)
Organization: University of Missouri
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 15:40:47 CST

In article <ewright.727735009@convex.convex.com>
ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
 
>In <93020.213759SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA (Graydon) writes:
>
>>Ed, whoa - why is being single a pathological condition?
>
>Being single is not a pathological condition.  *Enjoying*
>being single would be.  Evolution would have eliminating
>any such trait from the species long ago.
>
 
There's a "happy-to-be-mated" gene now???? I had mine here just a
minute ago....OH MY GODDDDDDD!!!! It's gone!!! Vanished into thin air!!
Last time I saw it was (let's see) Oh yes! several months before the last
break-up!!! (hold on, maybe I just misplaced it.....) ;)
 
Diane
 
ObPersonal:
Brunette would like to meet someone who has an expressive "happy-to-lavish
jewells-and-electronics-on-brunettes" gene! ;) Zygote status unimportant.
Must be dominent or willing to mutate.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nin15b63@merrimack.edu (The Wolf)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: HuggyBodyKissyFace
Date: 24 Jan 93 17:24:09 GMT
Distribution: soc
Organization: Merrimack College, No. Andover, MA, USA

In article <77221@apple.apple.COM>, stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
> Problem with tight hugs as a form of initial physical contact is that
> something sometimes tends to get in the way. (Now for some people this is a

Well, ya, but clothes are easy to remove.
-- 
 Andy Harrington                      | nin15b63@merrimack.edu
 Merrimack College, North Andover, MA | I'm too sexy for this network.
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a la 400ci)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Flirting How To Guide
Date: 23 Jan 93 23:02:06 GMT
Distribution: soc
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <93019.195221SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA (Graydon) writes:
>Specifically sexual interest - well, obviously you're not going out
>with someone who's primary interest in you is sexual, becuase they
>tend to tackle.

>It is important to make it clear that you consider the lady in question
>a sexual creature, since socially male interest in women is still almost
>entirely 'sexual interest', and if you're too polite to let such interest
>show much, she's very likely to decide that you're not interested.

This is a very good point.  But this must be done very tastefully, because 
some women will take it very wrong if it feels "dirty" to them.  The sexual 
interest must be packaged romantically or the person may just think you're a 
horny dude.

 -----------Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS--------
 ObQuotes:
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
 "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

    Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: SM ISO MAIL
Date: 27 Jan 93 15:46:13 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1993Jan26.201233.29325@advtech.uswest.com> smithrud@advtech.uswest.com writes:
|>
|>Well, Albuquerque ain't ocean front property, ya know. :)
|>Yep, fishies in the desert, and nocturnal, too.
|>Too bad nobody's been fishing out this way lately :(
|>r.
|
|Oh, Ron, not true.  I go fishing in Albuquerque about every 6 weeks
|and in November one actually made it to the shore (whatever a shore
|in the desert would be).  He didn't choke on the hook and he was
|still kicking and breathing.
|
|Doesn't knock "fly" fishing,  ;)
|
Flyfishing?  Is that when you put your hand down the front of a guys pants
and see what you can catch?

-- 
-john
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel)
Subject: touching without asking
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, University of Ottawa
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 03:50:07 GMT

In article <nomi.728082551@cgl.ucsf.edu>, nomi@cgl.ucsf.edu (Nomi L. Harris) writes:

> Anyway, to reiterate, I strongly recommend the approach of initiating
> subtle physical contact and seeing what happens.  If he/she doesn't
> respond, back off.

   For how long should I back off?

   And if I'm dating someone from a touch-resistant culture such as China,
how should I react to touch-resistance?

misrael@csi.uottawa.ca			Mark Israel
Sunbeams brightly play, where Fancy's fair pavilion once is pight.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Greetings Stef...
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:22:15 GMT

In article <1jmnlfINN3pn@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
>In article <phantasm.727633094@vincent1.iastate.edu> phantasm@iastate.edu () writes:
>>> Who are you, anyway? You keep coming around here with these mysterious 
>>> suck-ups, but I've never managed to catch you actually saying anything...
>>Forgive me... I did not realize that was a rule...
>
>Suck-ups with no substance is called 'fluff'.
>'fluff' belongs in alt.personals.chat.
>Have a >happy< day! *hug*
>(And a special huggsy wuggsy for a special man in peppermint tights! *HUG*)

Gosh with all the affection around here I guess I'll come out of my shell and:
 
The posting has been sent to your group as the winner in the "I moderate
anonymous postings but have no clue where I forward them to" contest.
It takes a special person(after receiving numerous requests to cease)
to ignore people and continue to show what an ass I am.
 
High people I'm looking for that special person who can appreciate the
crooning "squeel like a pig". I like going out behind the barn and meating
the animals on a moonlit nite. I like the feel of soft wool against my
backside. I like the way a pigs tail curls on a cold crisp autumn morn.
 
We're all really animals on the inside as well as the outside, doncha
think. Some people say frogs are slimy. I'm looking for that special
person who views the world as, frogs are lubricated. Someone who can
see past the chains that bind us.
 
I'm into dancing with donkeys, swirling with swans, rubbing with rams,
pedophiling with pidgeons, grabbing with geese, caressing with cows,
benwas with bulls and monopoly.
 
If your a step above the crowd or own a stepladder feel free to ring my
chimes by contacting the administrator of the anon service. He's my freend.
 
================================================================================
 Steatopygias's 'R' Us.          doh#0000000005 That ain't no Hottentot.
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. AMA#669373 DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft)
Subject: Re: A hug for illiterate flamers
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 02:50:30 GMT

In article <MARTINC.93Jan26202254@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>In article <1993Jan26.233327.27446@leland.Stanford.EDU> rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft) writes:
>
>   8.1 (or 10.0 in Canadian currency).
>
>Exchange rate's doing better, I see.

Nah, like everything else in Canada, suck-ups are subsidized.  It's a special
program that Ottawa has going to make sure that Canadian suck-ups aren't
overwhelmed by 'Merkin ones.  It's called "CanaSuck".  As you can see, they
still have a ways to go.  There are additional subsidies for Francophone
suckups, as well as for those in various Native tongues.  Very multicultural
society, Canada.

RNA
From: brent.mason@uuworld.via.mind.ORG (Brent Mason) 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish
Date: 20 Jan 93 21:34:00 GMT
Reply-To: brent.mason@uuworld.via.mind.ORG (Brent Mason) 
Distribution: world
Organization: Micro Exchange - Kenwood, CA - 707-833-4032

DH> From: dough@sierra.com (Douglas Henderson)
  > Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
  > Message-ID: <1993Jan16.022300.13027@sierra.com>
  > Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1993 02:23:00 GMT
  >
  > They may be in the minority
  > and you may have to waste time on dates with women who do mind, but sooner
  > or later you'll meet one who can appreciate your other qualities.  It's
  > simple: if the odds of this are 1 in 1000 (and I believe they are much
  > higher), then you just need to go on 1000 (at most) dates.  I tell you
  > in all sincerity, Ed, it gets easier as you meet more and more people.
  > Find the unusual ads, the ones that ask for qualities of substance, and
  > answer them.  Go out on as many dates as possible.  If it worked for me,
  > I honestly believe it can work for you.  You really deserve more than
  > endless petty arguments with people on the net.  Good luck, and
  > Happy Dating :-)

  Doug has many good points is his post here, but one thing that I have a
problem with is just this... 1000 (That's One Thousand Dates??)

  Now how many dates have you gone on lately that cost less than $20.00.
Now I'm not one to be cheap but 1000 x $20.00 comes out to be very near
$20,000.  Damn, You could buy a real nice car or put a good down payment
on a house for that.

  Having just gotten out of a marriage I haven't been on any dates yet,
but when I was dating I spent an average of $35 - 40.  It adds up in a
hurry.

  But then again, who every said LIFE was cheap!!

Brent Mason
---
 . BABBLE v1.0 . Arn't you glad MicroProcessors don't have Hormones!!
 . KMail 2.94  Micro Exchange
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: The Nice Guy Syndrome (was: Re: Male Men Bashers)
Date: 25 Jan 93 06:28:39 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:

>The "nice guys" 
>get happily married and go out of circulation.  The "jerks" are still
>out there dating.

What's the ratio of nice guys to jerks? If it's 1 to 10, that would help
explain why women tend to go out with jerks more often.

Remember Sturgeon's Law.

--
Stef                   C'mon Mike. Would the dolphins give up their
stef@apple.com         favorite sandwiches to save our butts? -- John Grimes
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Wall)
Subject: Re: *** SM ISO SF ***
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 21:23:30 GMT

In article <16646@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>
>I'm going to assume you mean alt.personals because as far as I can tell
>alt.singles doesn't exist.  If it does, it shouldn't.  You see, Brent, there's
>a reasons that discussions should take place in soc.singles and personal
>ads in alt.personals.  Granted, the charter is a little closer than say
>comp.unix.sources and rec.scuba, but each group has it's own charter.  That
                       ^^^^^^^^^
                          |
Hah, don't be too sure John, I read rec.scuba, and soc.singles regularly
and about a month ago we had our own problem with personals.  Some guy up
in the Boston area was advertising for a sexy female dive buddy.  It kinda
relates but he still got barbequed, caused quite a ruckus
in a nice calm quite group like rec.scuba.  I thought I was in the wrong
news group :-).

>charter should be read and understood by everyonce *before* they post an
>article to the group.  You can find the charters in news.announce.newusers.
>I recommend reading them.  The file which describes the alt.groups is actually
>quite entertaining.

Cheers,

Jeff

P.S. rec.scuba FAQ even states it is flame free, quite a contrast Huh.
From: brent.mason@uuworld.via.mind.ORG (Brent Mason) 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Interesting situation
Date: 20 Jan 93 22:08:00 GMT
Reply-To: brent.mason@uuworld.via.mind.ORG (Brent Mason) 
Distribution: world
Organization: Micro Exchange - Kenwood, CA - 707-833-4032

R > From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
  > Newsgroups: soc.singles
  > Subject: Re: Interesting situation -- help!
  > Message-ID: <1jg9efINNdpq@lynx.unm.edu>
  > Date: 19 Jan 1993 07:09:03 GMT
  >
  > In article <1993Jan19.023941.11642@fuug.fi> an6615@anon.penet.fi writes:
  > > 	My dilemma is the following, how do I broach the subject of the age
  > > difference, (or even if I should), and how do I find out how she feels abo
  > > starting a relationship?   I really like Lisa, and miss her a great deal,
  > > but I am confused, about how to follow up on it.
  >
  > You wasted 145 lines to say you're worried about a 6 year age difference?
  > If it bothers you that much, then you do have a problem.
  > 6 years is nothing if you really to like her.
  > r.

       Hey, I liked to story... at least it had a GOOD ending.

Brent Mason
---
 . BABBLE v1.0 . Error 216: Tagline out of paper.
 . KMail 2.94  Micro Exchange
                                                                                               
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: apdolan@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (dolan andrew)
Subject: INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE
Summary: INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 01:33:51 GMT
Keywords: INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE


For those interested in the general topic
of interracial marriage
and black woman/white man relationships
I have just come across a book, a bit on the old side
however,which has a number of chapters on that topic.
"Marriage across the Color line"
by Clotye Murdock Larsson. The white author and
his black wife also have some information about themselves
in the book.The book was published in 1965.

Anyone who has additional souces of information
on this topic, personal anecdotes, has had interracial dating or marriage experiences, knows of any new interracial dating clubs, etc.,
please post to this board, or, if you're nervous,
(actually, I've been dating black women for years and the worst
I've encountered has been a few rude stares and the like)
you can write to me direct at apdolan@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu  
Does anyone think this topic might warrant its own board?
From: brent.mason@uuworld.via.mind.ORG (Brent Mason) 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Circumcision (Was Re:
Date: 20 Jan 93 21:48:00 GMT
Reply-To: brent.mason@uuworld.via.mind.ORG (Brent Mason) 
Distribution: world
Organization: Micro Exchange - Kenwood, CA - 707-833-4032

KG> From: keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard)
  > Newsgroups: soc.singles
  > Subject: Re: Circumcision (Was Re: Ankle bracelets)

  > Amen.  I understand what you're saying here.  As one who has
  > been on both sides of the fence, physically speaking, I can
  > definitely say that being circumcised is a LOT better than
  > not being circumcised.  Before 21, I was not.  It was awful.
  > At 21, I had the operation, and life is so much better now!
  > I heartily recommend those who haven't had it done, to do so.
  > I also recommend that those who are having children, to go
  > ahead and have them done at birth.  It is cheaper and easier
  > all the way around.
  > Obviously, I haven't gone into details here, but if anyone
  > is really interested, E-mail me and I'll be happy to respond.
  > This is a "sore" subjuect with me.
  > --Keith

       I will have to confess that here too I would up having that awful
operation when I was 21.  My dick was so swollen for a few days that
you'd think I was J. Holmes.  Thank God for Vicodin!!

       The real problem was that I had just met my ex-wife who was a
virgin at the time and we had to wait until I was better to get it on.
One time she wrote me a nasty note, I had to put it down 3-4 times and
take a breather cause the swelling growth in my groin pulled on the
stiches (ouch!).

       When that moment came when we finally were able to get down to
business.. well after it was over we weren't sure who it was who was
bleeding, me or her!

Brent Mason

---
 . BABBLE v1.0 . Sitting on a park bench, eyeing little girls...  J. Tull
 . KMail 2.94  Micro Exchange
From: sms@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (steven.m.stein)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: what is attractive ?
Date: 25 Jan 93 20:52:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: cbfsb.1993Jan25.205235.14264
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T




				me ?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (dreas)
Subject: Re: Zen and the art of refrig upkeep 
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 93 03:54:41 GMT


(Meloney D Cregor) writes:
>(Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>
>>9.6 on the Broad-Band-Come-On scale
>
>Ahwww, come on Aahz!  I'm just getting back into flirting stride.  My 
>flirter got broken and it has just been awful getting it fixed. What with
>not being able to find a manual and then getting parts and you just can't
>imagine the difficulty trying to find someone to fix these things.  It was
>just awful, I tell you.  And I still have to work all the 'kinks' out of it.
>
>There.  Do I get extra points for pleading?

Pleading:        -0.2
Aahz's score:     9.6
Grudge dropping: +0.2
ISObabe value:   +0.3
----------------------
Total:            9.9

dreas



Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: Important Answer Provided
Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:29:40 GMT

In article <77502@apple.apple.COM> pooh@Apple.COM (Pooh) writes:
>In the referenced article, aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>>Kinky vanilla queer het
>
>So what is this, Aahz?  An SAT test?  "KINKY is to VANILLA
>as QUEER is to ..."

No, it's just four words strung together as a single self-descriptive
adjective.  I suppose it really ought to be, "KinkyVanillaQueerHet," but
I'm not into DrieuxSpeak.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Kinky vanilla queer het
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: smersch@eng.clemson.edu (Iron Tiger)
Subject: Re: chocolate (John F.)
Reply-To: smersch@eng.clemson.edu
Organization: College of Engineering, Clemson Univ.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 04:20:56 GMT

In article 29156@hubcap.clemson.edu, smersch@eng.clemson.edu (Iron Tiger) writes:
>It's yummy and easy to spread when heated.

In article 16544@auspex-gw.auspex.com, johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.000640.29156@hubcap.clemson.edu> smersch@eng.clemson.edu writes:
>>It's yummy and easy to spread when heated.
>
>Sounds like one of them cheap, sleazy, hussies.

Only if you scratch just above my ass and make my
tail go up.





Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk (Guy Barry)
Subject: Re: SM ISO MAIL
Reply-To: Guy.Barry@cl.cam.ac.uk
Organization: U of Cambridge Comp Lab, UK
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 12:10:37 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.023459.20657@netcom.com> marcia@netcom.com (Marcia) writes:
>In article <1993Jan22.202225.29423@infodev.cam.ac.uk> Guy.Barry@cl.cam.ac.uk writes:
>>Precisely.  You're allowed to go into a pub with the sole intention of
>>picking up MOTAS, as long as you never explicitly admit it.  It's
>>exactly the same with this newsgroup.  (For most people it's about 
>>as successful, as well.)
>
>If you want to be explicit about it, try alt.personals. That's what the 
>newsgroup was created for.

*Did* I say that those were *my* intentions?  Ye Gods, perish the
thought!

(I leave it as an exercise to the reader to work out whether I'm
being serious or flippant.)


--
Guy Barry, University of Cambridge | Phone: +44 (0)223 334757 
Computer Laboratory                | Fax: +44 (0)223 334678
New Museums Site, Pembroke Street  | JANET: Guy.Barry@uk.ac.cam.cl 
Cambridge CB2 3QG, England, UK     | Internet: Guy.Barry@cl.cam.ac.uk
From: pooh@Apple.COM (Pooh)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Important Answer Provided
Date: 25 Jan 93 13:04:18 GMT
Organization: Internet Refugee Camp

In the referenced article, aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>>AnyThing[tm] is Better in BED than a NiceGuy[tm]!!!!!
>
>Oh, I don't know about that......

I agree with Aahz.  As my half-brother told me: "Watch out
for the quiet ones -- they're the most dangerous (and exciting)."

He was right!  Boy howdy!

>Kinky vanilla queer het

So what is this, Aahz?  An SAT test?  "KINKY is to VANILLA
as QUEER is to ..."

Pooh
	pooh@apple.com
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: What Drieux has to Say about this
Date: 21 Jan 93 10:13:06
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
NNTP-Posting-Host: grover.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: rohwerwd@netcom.com's message of Thu, 21 Jan 1993 08:33:34 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.083334.9968@netcom.com> rohwerwd@netcom.com (W. David Rohwer) writes:

   >Just Say NO! to Hetro!
   >
   >its cureable you know.
   >

	Just Say YES to Homo!

	I don't think so because it is yucky, yucky, yucky.

Nah, homos are just heteros in drag.  It those damn orgasms that are the
real problem.  Give up on orgasms and the whole question's moot.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max)
Subject: Re: Credibility and Trueness
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 02:30:21 GMT

In article <93025.203945SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> Graydon <SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> writes:

>But almost all of Ed being tooth-gratingly obnoxious seems to
>be sourced in a belief that he's loathsome.  

Nope Graydon, Ed thinks everyone else is loathsome because they (according
to him) don't find attractive what he is willing to offer.

Ed thinks that people put too much emphasis on physical attractiveness - Ed
thinks that this is an inappropriate standard by which to judge whether or
not to become involved with someone. Ed feels that he has the high moral
ground on this issue because he doesn't give ANY weight to physical
characteristics when it comes to LOVING someone. Ed doesn't feel loathsome,
Ed feels superior.

So was I paying enough attention to what you wrote Ed?

Max
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.penpals,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat
From: fulton@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Ben Fulton)
Subject: Re: SM ISO MAIL
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:28:53 GMT

In <1993Jan22.152820.20562@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:

>In article <C19GCo.DE7@cen.ex.ac.uk> st92rcn@cen.ex.ac.uk writes:
>>My name is rachel and I want your body
>Hi Rachel.  My name is Nancy, and if you want a body like mine that bad
>I suggest you climb some stairs, do some bike-riding, and use those cross-
>country skis for something other than supporting your food cache.

On the other hand, if you want a body like mine, sit on the couch, grab a
coupla beers and a big bowl of chips, and watch the Super Bowl...


-- 
ben
fulton@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Bloomington, IN)

and
Newsgroups: soc.singles