HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: werner@rascal.ics.utexas.edu (Werner Uhrig)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: TelePort FullFax 2.03 available for FTP from RASCAL
Date: 14 Aug 1992 14:32:33 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
Reply-To: werner@rascal.ics.utexas.edu (Werner Uhrig)
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


	the latest release for Global Village TelePort modems
	is available for FTP from RASCAL.ICS.UTEXAS.EDU,
	directory  mac/support-of-products/GlobalVillage
	files

 440 -rw-r--r--  1 werner     442112 Aug 14 06:21 TelePort2.03disk1.image.sea
 288 -rw-r--r--  1 werner     285696 Aug 14 06:25 TelePort2.03disk2.image.sea

	these are 2 distribution disk images in compressed binary format
	(i.e. you need to retrieve them with binary transfer protocol in
	FTP, else you end up with unusable files).  version 2.04 is
	needed for use with the PowerPort line of modems and is available
	for FTP from site TAMMY.HARVARD.EDU (128.103.96.19) in directory
	pub/mac/GlobalVillage (and may be available on RASCAL also, by
	the time you check for it)

				Cheers,		---Werner

ps: I'm just another customer of Global Village, but I do take bribes
	and gifts which aren't unethical (chocolates prefered over
	emailed thank-you notes ;-)

  werner@cs.utexas.edu |  ..!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!werner | werner@UTXVM.bitnet

	my hat is off to Henry Gonzales, Democratic Congressman
		from San Antonio, Texas.....
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: POP server for VAX/VMS FTP site?
From: Jeff E Mandel <mandel@tmc.tulane.edu>
Date: 18 Aug 92 07:44:37 CDT

Nntp-Posting-Host-[nntpd-10388]: mandel.anes.tulane.edu
X-Xxdate: Tue, 18 Aug 92 13:41:12 GMT
Organization: Tulane University School of Medicine
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d7
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 12:41:13 GMT

In article <1992Aug12.181428.26733@polaris.utu.fi> Risto Virtanen,
rvirta@utu.fi writes:
>A few months ago there was discussion about POP server for VAX/VMS.
>Is there a FTP-site to get a PD version of this POP server?
>Everybody  wants to use Eudora;-)

 IUPOP3 is available from logos.ucs.indiana.edu. The current version is
1.7. It is compatible with Eudora, and for that matter, with NUPop
(Nortwestern's PC POP client).

Jeff E Mandel MD MS
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Tulane University School of Medicine
New Orleans, LA

mandel@vax.anes.tulane.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: Ben E. Colley <tpmaint@mizzou1.missouri.edu>
Subject: Re: ARA Driver
Organization: University of Missouri-Columbia
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 15:52:48 GMT

From: Rick Zeman, Rick.Zeman@p943.f70.n109.z1.fidonet.org
In article <714024111.F00003@blkcat.UUCP> Rick Zeman,
Rick.Zeman@p943.f70.n109.z1.fidonet.org writes:

>Has anyone seen (or written) a Remote Access driver for a Practical
Peripherals
>PM14400 V.32bis faxmodem?  ARA only came with the V32 9600 driver and I
want
>the extra throughput of 14.4.
>I figure that if someone else has already done the work, I won't have to
use
>the modem workshop and write one.
>If you have one, could you PLEASE Binhex it and mail it to me?

I started writing one and had it so it would originate fine, but was
still having difficulties when answering.  On groping through the manual
looking for *something*, I noticed the PM14400 claims to be very
compatible with the Hayes Ultra line.   Well, I had a Hayes Ultra script
sitting around I had found at Sumex (in the info-mac/comm directory--see
ARA CCL's or some such).   It seems to work just fine.
 
Ben
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: gweil@ichips.intel.com (Garry A. Weil)
Subject: zmodem protocol over telnet
Summary: can't transfer files over telnet session
Keywords: zmodem zterm telnet
Organization: MultiMedia Software Tools Group, Intel Corp.
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 18:48:42 GMT

Here are the facts: I dial a call-back system called defender to get access 
to my unix host at work. It calls back and I am connected to a unix host, 
not the one I need to transfer files from. I am then asked which host I 
would like access to. I respond and I am 'telnetted' to my unix host. Now I 
would like to transfer files to/from my mac using zterm 0.9. I start up a 
transfer, in either direction, and nothing happens. I think the telnet 
protocol is only allowing 7-bits through, thus causing problems with zmodem 
protocols. Is there anything that can be done to get 8-bit through the 
telnet protocol?

The only work around is to use a app with kermit protocol. Kermit escapes 
the 8-bit stuff, but it is so damm slow!!
Garry
----------
Garry Weil
gweil@ichips.intel.com		After August 28th:gweil@ibeam.ht.intel.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: davidj@byron.u.washington.edu (David Jardine)
Subject: Appleshare for application sharing?
Reply-To: davidj@u.washington.edu
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 01:05:53 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Connecting an HP95 to a MAC
From: gilf@vms.huji.ac.il (GIL FREUND)
Date: 15 Aug 1992 12:56 IDT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    Lines: 13

A friend (not on the net) asked me about connecting an HP95 to  a
MAC.  According  to  the  Israeli  distributor,  there is no link
package for the HP95 with a MAC.
As  I  understand  both  the  HP95  and  the  MAC  support  RS232
communication, and  both have  Kermit software  versions. What  I
need is a  pin layout for  both computers. If  anyone has attempt
such a connection, or knows the pin layout, I will make the cable
myself and use Kermit.

Thanks

Gil

Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: Charles_Kneifel@ncsu.edu (Charles L. Kneifel)
Subject: mac to unix printing
Keywords: lpd, lpr, appletalk, ethertalk
Reply-To: Charles_Kneifel@ncsu.edu (Charles L. Kneifel)
Organization: College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, NCSU
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 13:02:43 GMT

Hello,

I would like peoples recommendations on print spooling software that
will allow my macintoshes on ethernet and localtalk to print to 
unix print spoolers.  If you have experience with ethertalk or
localtalk solutions (or both) I would like to hear about your
experiences with SOFTWARE solutions.  I don't want to buy a
gator box or fastpath to do this.  The unix boxes in question
are SGIs and IBM RS/6000s so a CAP only solution will not work with
out the additional hardware.  I will summarize to net if I get
sufficient interest.

Thanks,

Charley Kneifel
(Charles_Kneifel@ncsu.edu)

Charles L. Kneifel
(Charles_Kneifel@ncsu.edu)
-------------------------
Xref: sparky comp.sys.mac.comm:8104 comp.protocols.appletalk:3143
From: fradin@irisa.fr (Marc Fradin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm,comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: problem with NFS clients : symbolic links do not appear
Date: 20 Aug 92 08:18:59 GMT
Organization: IRISA, Rennes (Fr)

I use CAP/Aufs for remote file systems access on SUN from my
macintosh !
It works find also with symbolic links !

I tried both NFShare and PathwayNFS but symbolic links do not
appear on my Macintosh volume !

Is it normal ?

Thanks in advance.

Marc Fradin                        Marc.Fradin@rennes.enst-bretagne.fr 
ENST BRETAGNE                      Phone : (33) 99 28 08 91
B.P. 78                            Fax   : (33) 99 28 08 92
35512 CESSON SEVIGNE - FRANCE      Telex : 741 906
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: deek@pecan.cns.udel.edu (michael deerkoski)
Subject: Re: Power Port experiences?
Organization: University of Delaware, Newark
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 01:49:08 GMT

In article <OGAWA.92Aug14201141@actor.sm.sony.co.jp> ogawa@sm.sony.co.jp (Masato Ogawa) writes:
>In article <VTURNER.92Aug6190147@fred.nmsu.EDU> vturner@fred.nmsu.EDU (Vaughan Turner) writes:
>>    The major thing it didn't do was that when communicating at 14,400 baud,
>>    v.42bis, the max throughput should be 14,400 * 4, or 57,600 baud.  But the
>>    PowerPort Gold only talks to the Mac at 38,400 baud.  Using Zterm at the
>>    higher setting didn't work; I got garbage.
>
>YES! Oh, my friend!
>
>I wonder why. I expect 57,600. Is it too fast for PowerBook 100?
>
>It can be experienced with freeterm and MicroPhone 1.6 which are
>bundled with GVC's. So I completely confused...
>
I own a PowerBook 100 and a PowerPort Gold (In fact I'm using it right now)
and YES, you can not set the serial port to 57,600.

However, I have NEVER seen any v.32bis modem, no matter what mac it's plugged in
to, have more throughput than 38,400...even with v.42 bis.  In fact,
the PowerBook using v.32bis/v.42bis outruns my SE/30 w/Prometheus Ultima
Home Office!

By the way, I use MicroPhone 4.0.1 and had LOADS of problems with the
PowerPort over 9600 bps until I downloaded the new PowerPort V.32 v4.0.1 driver,
which is compatible with the PowerPort Gold.
-- 
Michael Deerkoski           |Internet: deek@brahms.udel.edu
Undergraduate               |          deek@freezer.cns.udel.edu
University of Delaware      |CompuServe: 76300,2612|AppleLink:      deek
Apple Computer Student Rep. |                      |America Online: deek
From: Mark.Tucker@f421.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Mark Tucker)
Sender: Uucp@blkcat.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: ?ABATON INTERFAX WITH FAXSHARE #2
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 14:48:00 -0500

 > From: Rick_McCormack@mindlink.bc.ca (Rick McCormack)
 > Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
 > Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
 > 
 > Well, seems no-one on the net uses the Abaton Interfax and Faxshare 
 > over a
 > localtalk network. Is anyone sharing a fax modem over an Apple- or 
 > Local-talk
 > network?  Would such a person care to comment on how well or poorly 
 > this works.
 > 
 > Thanks for any info.
 > 
 > rick mccormack

We are currently using Dove FaxLAN on an AppleTalk EtherNet network.  It works
very well, although it requires that the fax server be a different machine than
the file server.  I have not used Abaton Interfax of Faxshare.  If you would
like to know more about Dove FaxLAN E-mail me.
From: reidc@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Chris Reid)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: EasyTransfer now avail.
Date: 20 Aug 92 12:16:19 GMT
Organization: Glasgow University Computing Science Dept.


EasyTransfer is a tool that lets users send files from one Mac to another
Mac anywhere in the world without the need to BinHex/Compress/Cut-into-parts
the file first. It allows you to set up accounts for other Mac users. It is
designed for groups of people that frequently exchange files and cannot
do so (or only with BinHex etc work) quickly. EasyTransfer is real time
which means that there are no mail queue delays etc.
Anybody find this useful?
Please mail me if you are interested and I will either post it (if I get
enough replies), or mail it (you'll never have to do this again!) to you
personally.

Contact me at

	reidc@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk

Cheers,

	Chris
From: naleks@warren.med.harvard.edu (Norm Aleks)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Can I set rwin, mtu, maxseg on MacTCP?
Keywords: MacTCP
Date: 20 Aug 92 19:43:20 GMT
Organization: Countway Library of Medicine

There is a computer system here at Harvard Medical School called Countway 
Plus (not that it matters, but it's a Medline search system run by Countway 
Library).  It runs on several PC's that connect to a terminal server and use 
pcAnywhere to emulate a VT100.  Therefore, it's available by Telnet.

What does this have to do with MacTCP, you ask.

The problem we've found is that we get jerky, clunky screen updates when 
using any MacTCP-based Telnet program.  Half or a third of the screen will 
come in, then there will be a pause (of anything up to several seconds), and 
then another chunk of screen will come in.  This problem doesn't occur on
PC's (yes, on the same Ethernet).  I have found that I get good performance 
from a Mac if I use NCSA Telnet 2.5 with the following in config.tel:

		hardware=Ether9                (this is a Mac IIsi)
                ...
		rwin=4096
		mtu=1024
		maxseg=1024

If I use MacTCP, or if I use hardware=Ether9 and default values for rwin, 
mtu, and maxseg (512 all the way through), I go back to jerky updates.

This makes me think that, if I could change these three values in 
MacTCP, I'd be set.  Does anyone have any ideas?

BTW I can't seem to run MacTCP for my other applications (like Fetch 
or Newswatcher) while running NCSA Telnet with hardware=Ether9.  So 
it's not an option to drop MacTCP for this program only.

I'd really appreciate some help.  Did I mention that I am the person 
people complain to when this system acts up?

Thanks!

Norm Aleks

naleks@harvard.edu
Countway Library of Medicine, Harvard University     (617) 432-2139
From: mikey@nrc.com (Mikey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: LOOKING FOR SANTOS.....ARE YOU OUT THERE
Date: 17 Aug 92 18:39:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: nrc.1992Aug17.183939.14805
Organization: NRC
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A6B54088E201CA7A@homer.nrc.com>
X-Xxdate: Mon, 17 Aug 92 11:39:52 GMT
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d8

Looking to contact SANTOS in Sothern California......Please, if somebody
knows him please mail me his address or how to get intouch with him.  
Thanks.!


mikey@nrc.com
From: Mark.Tucker@f421.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Mark Tucker)
Sender: Uucp@blkcat.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: QUADRA ETHERNET CONNECTIONS
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 10:55:45 -0500

 > I just bought the wife a Quadra since she was whining about how slow 
 > her cx
 > was and a IIg just because I could.  Now I want to replace our 
 > LocalTalk
 > with Ethernet.  The company store doesn't sell the Apple FriendlyNet
 > adaptors, but ComputerWare does for $139 each and they have to order 
 > them,
 > so I'm not in any hurry.  That means that I should find out what 
 > other
 > options exist for running a very small Ethernet (3 nodes) in 
 > conjunction
 > with a 2 node LocalTalk network (the PowerBook and a spare SE/30).
 > 
 > I realize my choices are thick, thin and twisted pair, but I don't 
 > know any
 > details, costs or advantages of one over the other.  What other 
 > companies
 > provide the same hardware?  I think Asante and Farallon do, but I 
 > really
 > don't know.
 > 
 > I also believe that I will need to run a router, with the Apple 
 > Internet
 > Router as an obvious choice, in order to allow the machines to talk 
 > on both
 > Ethernet and LocalTalk at the same time.  Can I actually run the 
 > router on
 > each Quadra so that we won't have to have them both on just to talk 
 > to both
 > nets?
 > 
 > Can anyone provide some advice?
 > 
 > Jon

ASANTE sells the 10Base-T (twisted pair) FriendlyNet adapter as well.  You can
get it mail order for about $80.00.  If you go with 10Base-T, you will need a
hub as well. ASANTE also makes a small EtherNet hub (8 nodes).  We use an ASANTE
hub and EtherNet cards, and I have been very happy with them.  We also use
Liaison from Farallon as a router between LocalTalk and EtherNet and it is
working great.  You would want to put the router on one of the Quadras.  That
machine would have to be left on to take advantage of the router.  It runs
completely in the background.  The router seperates LocalTalk and EtherNet into
two seperate AppleTalk zones so that a machine in either zone can access any of
the services on the network.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Trouble with Techworks Ethernet IIsi
From: dskeeler@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Dennis S. Keeler)
Date: 14 Aug 92 10:32:29 -0500
Organization: Miami University

	Has anyone else tried to use the new TechWorks EtherNet IIsi card
w/FPU? I got one that just wouldn't work. Every time I used their Ethertest
software, it says:
	Controller loopback: Failed ($FFFFFFEB)
	Serializer loopback: Failed ($FFFFFFEB)
	We are just using 10BT, so other tests are not applicable.
	I called tech support and they sent me a new card (FedEx, next day,
TechWorks has great support). This one passed the tests. Everything seemed fine
until I plugged my SCSI chain back in (yes, everything was off).
	I started getting the same errors with EtherTest. But then after
testing again, it gave another error: SONIC ADDRESS FAILURE.
	Repeated tests on the card gave the address failure 85% of the time,
the Failed ($FFFFFFEB) 10%, and Passed 5% (approximately).
	So have I just been unlucky? I really like the support of this company
and have had fine experiences with their memory upgrades for the PowerBook.
Plus they make an A/UX driver. So I don't want to give up on them. Oh, well,
the third card is in the mail, so I'll let you all know how it goes.
____________
Dennis S. Keeler                |  "Common sense is that thin veneer of
Miami University                |    prejudice we acquire before the
DSKEELER@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu  |    age of 17." - Albert Einstein
DSKEELER@miavx1.bitnet          |
From: black@devnull.mpd.tandem.com (David C. Black)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Problems with MacSLIP/MacTCP <-> Telebit Netblazer
Date: 13 Aug 92 01:46:41 GMT
Reply-To: black@devnull.mpd.tandem.com (David C. Black)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tandem Computers; Austin TX
Originator: black@auriga

I am having problems getting a MacSLIP connection to work.  The funny
thing is that I can get NCSA/BYU Telnet 2.4.19 SLIP to work like a
charm.  I have MacTCP 1.1 and MacSLIP 1.01.  I got MacSLIP to dial in
successfully and connect. When I bring up Telnet it get the MacTCP
drivers OK, but I can never connect with a host :( !  I configured my
manual local IP same as for the stand-alone Telnet SLIP.  My mask is a
class C (255.255.255.0), and my gateway server IP is just what the MIS
guys tell me (I even experimented with some others, but no banana).  On
the remote end (host network) we have a Telebit Netblazer setup for
static SLIP login.  Very frustrating - I have other applications that
use MacTCP waiting in the background.

Anyone with more ideas?  Any good tools to trouble shoot this?  The 
tool that came with MacSLIP isn't helping.
-- 
| David C. Black                  Electrical Engineer                    |
| Tandem Computers Incorporated   Guardian: SMTPGATE@AUSTIN(black@tzone) |
| 14231 Tandem Blvd.              Internet: black@mpd.tandem.com         |
|_Austin, Texas 78728-6699________Phone: (512) 244-8321__________________|
Xref: sparky comp.sys.mac.comm:7883 comp.sys.mac.misc:14772
From: werner@cs.utexas.edu (Werner Uhrig)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm,comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Need a little info on UUPC 3.0 for Mac
Date: 13 Aug 1992 13:23:44 -0500
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: dimebox.cs.utexas.edu


 df2tg2n@shoes.bell-atl.com writes:
>Can somebody summarize the use of UUPC on the Mac?  Here are a few
>questions I have concerning running under Sys 7.
>
>(1) Can UUPC run in background?

	yep.  works nicely on the SE-30 I have set up to do that

>(2) How hard is it to setup and admin?

	there are a few pit-falls in setting it up (because you have
	to do it with ResEdit in a stupid way that had me scream for
	the HI-police), but its down-hill after that. (use Dave Platt's
	shareware FernMail with it as mail-interface rather than the
	application that comes with uupc 3.0)

>(3) Is 3.0 the latest version?

	as far as I know...

>(4) Can I receive news, send mail, send files, other?

	not news (that I know) but "thumbs up" on it otherwise...
-- 
  werner@cs.utexas.edu |  ..!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!werner | werner@UTXVM.bitnet

              "Free Advice and Opinions -- Refunds Available"
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: sgrenander@NASAMAIL.JPL.NASA.GOV (Sven Grenander)
Subject: Re: MacTCP & ARA
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 20:28:26 GMT

Barry Kort states:
>If you plan to use MacTCP via ARA, the do not also install MacTCP
>on the machine acting as the ARA Server ...
>...at present only one of them can be using MacTCP.

This statement agrees with some flakiness we have experienced in
running Fetch and NewsWatcher via ARA. However, this does seem to
be a rather fundamental shortcoming and we are therefore wondering
where it is documented. We are also curious what the incompatibilities
are as we have had frequent/occasional success with MacTCP on both 
server and Client.

When you say "install" do you mean active ("using"), or just resident ? Any
ideas why it often/sometimes works ? 

Thanks,

-Sven
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
From: u895174@bruny.cc.utas.edu.au (Tim Morris)
Subject: Re: ZTerm Troubles
Organization: University of Tasmania, Australia.
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 07:59:27 GMT

I initially wrote:

>Hi all,
>	I'm having problems using ZTerm with a 9600 baud MegaPlus V-32
>modem.  If I am using Z-Modem transfers, it works fine until it writes
>a portion of the download to disk.  While the hard disk is saving, errors
>start clocking up on the transfer ("Data Subpacket too long, CRC error" etc.).

Let me clarify what I'm doing.  From Z-Term I type:

  AT&D0		(To ignore DTR)
  AT&K3		(RTS/CTS flow control)
  AT\N0		(Constant speed mode - closest I could find to "fixed DTE
		 speed")

  In the Settings Connection dialogue, I set the transfer rate to 38400
and check the "XON/XOFF" flow control,  because that's the flow control used by 
the university at the other end.

When I connect with these settings, I can't type anything and I only get
garbage back.  If I drop the speed down to 9600, then it works but with
the problems described above.  If I uncheck "XON/XOFF" I can't type anything.

THe cable I'm using was built to the specs given in the manual.  Help!

Thanks,
Tim.
From: lkimes@alshain.usc.edu (Lance 'Moof' Kimes)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: Novell's Mac NLM and appletalk network numbers
Date: 13 Aug 1992 17:03:05 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: alshain.usc.edu



In article <1992Aug13.231348.6434@novell.com>, cranch@novell.com (Christopher Ranch) writes:
|> In article <713743277.F00001@blkcat.UUCP> Don.Noll@p3425.f70.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Don Noll) writes:
|> >On 8/12/92, Anthony Olejnik said something very interesting to All on the
|> >subject of  Novell's Mac NLM and appletalk network numbers
|> >
|> >  AO> From: tony@scotty.dccs.upenn.edu (Anthony Olejnik) Newsgroups:
|> >  AO> comp.sys.mac.comm Organization: University of Pennsylvania
|> >  AO> 
|> >  AO> On a Netware File server containing both an Ethernet card and a
|> >  AO> LocalTalk card, is it necessary to define a separate appletalk network
|> >  AO> number for both the internal and external (localtalk card) networks?
|> >  AO> 
|> >  AO> I have the Mac NLM configured as a non-seed router on the ethernet
|> >  AO> side, so that's not an issue.
|> >  AO> 
|> >  AO> However, I'm not sure if its necessary to define an appletalk network
|> >  AO> number for the internal appletalk network and the external (via the
|> >  AO> localtalk card) network.
|> >  
|> >You don't need to, but then ALL AppleTalk traffic on the ethernet will get
|> >propagated to the LocalTalk segment.  If you use seperate Zone names and
|> >numbers then you will be ROUTING instead of bridging, which means better
|> >performance, especially on the LocalTalk side.........
|> 
|> 	This is completely bogus.  Bridging in the way you are speaking
|> 	does not exist at all.  If you want connectivity, you will need
|> 	to bind AppleTalk to each interface, and then you will route.
|> 	How in the world did you come to believe this?!?
|> 
|> 	Chris
|> ---
|> Chris Ranch
|> Internetworking Products Division
|> Novell, Inc.  San Jose, CA
|> (408)473-8667  cranch@novell.com

But why does Novell Server have to create unique network numbers when running
under Phase2? I know a server with an "internal" localtalk network and also
"bound" through its ethernet card to the rest of our network. I have been told
that it can't be configure to have the same network number as the rest of the
network, that it must create its own.

Its not doing routing, just "bound" to the two separate networks through a local
and ethernet cards.  Why can't its network be 644 like all other nodes?

Lance Kimes