HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller)
Subject: Re: long hair
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 92 07:40:59 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <=5nmwnk.catcher@netcom.com> catcher@netcom.com (Paul W. Francisco) writes:
>
>There are just certain things that you can't do with short hair like
>some light feathery tickling during times of intimacy, not to mention
>other things.  Not that I don't like short hair, but in some respects
>it's not as versatile.  Besides, it's not as if getting smacked in the
>face with long hair hurts :-)
>
In the category of "other things", one thing that I like to do with
my hair (and am growing it out for) is giving backrubs.  Well, maybe
not back*rubs* - long hair back caresses?  I don't really know what
the term is, but basically what's involved is brushing my hair out
so it's really smooth, then running it slowly up and down the bare
back of my victim, I mean, partner.  When I'm feeling especially
devilish, I'll go for the backs of the knees, too.

The longer hair the better, I've found, because using just the ends
tends to tickle.  (Not that that's bad, it's just not the technique
I'm trying, albeit bumblingly, to describe.)
From: dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: A short metaphor for love
Date: 29 Jul 1992 13:03:41 GMT
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
Reply-To: dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

In article <1992Jul29.013845.22771@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
>In article <l7bdquINN92v@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>>I asked the baby for a kiss and she whapped me in the face with a block.
>
>Mommy said 'Owitch!', and baby kissed mommy on the cheek and said 'Dea, I made
>it aww betta'.
>
>(Notice how the Boston accent enters in at an early age there)

Just to correct this hideous slander before it affects anyones opinion of
me.

I am not from Boston, I am from Ohio.  This means, among other things:

a)  I do not push little old ladies down on the sidewalk to make the train
when there's going to be another train along in five minutes.

b)  I do not behave as if I had a pickle up my rear end.

c)  I DO NOT TALK LIKE ELMER FUDD.

(Also, the baby only says mamamamamam.  She occasionally says dadadadada, but
I explain that we don't use language like that in our house.)

Now don't make that mistake again.

Dawn
"If he attempts to kiss her on the lips she should turn her head slightly so
that the kiss falls harmlessly on her cheek instead.  If he attempts to kiss
her anyplace else she should quickly pull the gown back in place, spring from
the bed, and announce that nature calls her to the toilet.  This will generally
dampen his desire to kiss in the forbidden territory."
"Instruction and Advice for the Young Bride" by Ruth Smythers (1894)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women,soc.men
From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
Subject: Re: I'm Crushed
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 92 23:04:56 GMT
Organization: QQQCLC

In article <n2kmj2m.aahz@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius) writes:
>Stef's a perfectly fine choice for net.deity, as long as you don't mind
>a bit of mud on your rugs.

	I thought that was clay, not mud.

						Kayembee :-)
From: swann@acsu.buffalo.edu (Stephen Swann)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: seeking higher ground
Date: 22 Jul 92 17:33:53 GMT
Organization: UB

In article <1992Jul22.134508.26525@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>In article <2152@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com> luzenko@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com (Bill Luzenko) writes:
>>In soc.singles I find that men comments are six times the womens.
>>And when a women is involved in three times out of five we have a
>>battle of the  sexes.  Anyone  can  project  this  confidence  in
>>themselves  that polarizes one against the other. I would use the
>>bandwith to get down to details to find the infinitesimal  common
>>ground  which would yield the faintest echo of cordial thaught as
>>hard as it may seem.
>
>What?

A bunch of statistical mumbo jumbo.  I think his thesis is too many
"womens" in a polarized field will cause the bandwidth to be too
finely detailed, thus making it very difficult to hear the echos,
especially if you've drunk too much cordial.

Just ignore it.

-- 
Steve Swann                 |    Speak to me in many voices; make
swann@acsu.buffalo.edu      |      them all sound like one...  -BOC
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.peeves
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Re: Neccesary and sufficient conditions
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 12:36:20 GMT

tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:

] In article <70369@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
] >
] >Once upon a time only men had performance anxiety. Now due to the sexual
] >revolution and women's rights, women can have it too! Yes, women too can
] >feel inferior if they don't have dozens of ejaculatory orgasms per night...
] 
] You mean there are women out there who don't?  
] 
] Trygve   (But does the standard trick of imagining your audience in their
]           underclothes work for this sort of performance anxiety as well?) 


I wish to apologize, I did NOT intend that
this should degenerate into an OrgasmFlameFest.

heavens, but that was NOT my intentions....

ciao
drieux


ps: always interesting to watch one of my well
reasoned purely intellectually grounded inquiries
into the nature of reasoning, degenerate into this
sort of MorallyDisgustingPutrification!!!!!

ObPeeve: That People Pick on my Sweet Innocent Postings
and do these AwfulIkkyYukkyNastyThings with them...


-- 
I Do Not Believe in .sig files
as they are such a Known Waste Of BandWidth,
And Therefore Not a Morally UpRight Choice.
But I Can See the HideousHienousHandOfHeteroSexualityBehindItAll.
Newsgroups: soc.singles,ba.singles
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins)
Subject: Re: Looking for Cathleen Greenberg
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 10:54:33 GMT

In article <8#fmf#c.bob@netcom.com> bob@netcom.com (Robert Becker) writes:
>In article <1992Jul21.190541.5019@island.COM> don@island.COM (Don Hermes) writes:
>>In article <1992Jul20.010426.10315@nmsu.edu> honest@acca.nmsu.edu (Shower with a Friend) writes:
>>>
>>>I am looking for Cathleen Greenberg, she was in Stanford University
>
>Why?  It took us months and months to get rid of her.

Hey!  She was pretty nice (for a while).  I almost went on a date with her
(before I came to my senses) to Tibet, and to the Caribbean.
From: cabrales.cs.wisc.ed!rawdon@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Breast Puns
Date: 23 Jul 92 03:22:00 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Dept., Madison, WI
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In <1992Jul22.162535.3177@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> 
cjp8b@dayhoff.med.Virginia.EDU (Chris Penington) writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.155954.430@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> 
nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>>In article <MARTINC.92Jul22114137@grover.cs.unc.edu> 
martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>>>In article <k-fmntp.aahz@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius) writes:
>>>Thank you for making a clean breast of it.
>>>Another thread of puns?  I bet we can return you tit for tat.
>>Ah, a thread like this is sure to bring back some great mammaries.

[Now THERE'S a line that conjures up some amusing mental images.]

>Let's milk it for all it's worth!!!

Shouldn't this be part of the "suck-up" thread?

Hang in there...

-- 
Michael Rawdon
rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department, Madison, WI

beta test, v. To voluntarily entrust one's data, one's livelihood and one's
    sanity to hardware or software intended to destroy all three.  In earlier
 
    days, virgins were often selected to beta test volcanos.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: probst@fraser.sfu.ca (Scott Probst)
Subject: Re: seeking higher ground
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 00:01:46 GMT

In article <1992Jul27.142708.28497@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>In article <7LZgoB2w164w@depsych.Gwinnett.COM> dy@depsych.Gwinnett.COM (Dr. Yes) writes:
>
>>
>>What kind of "schools" do women go to?  Arts and crafts?  When you
>>stop to think about it most classes that are _about_ something are
>>attended mostly by males.
>>
>
>Anybody else get maybe a glimmering of why this guy might have a difficult
>time meeting/attracting women?
>
his hair?   

-- 
Scott Probst: Brain and Behaviour Laboratory, Psychology dept, SFU
              Graduate Issues Officer, Simon Fraser Student Society.
e-mail: probst@fraser.sfu.ca - ph: (604) 291 3354/3181 - fax: (604) 291 5843
              "yes, well, and here we go again..."   Dr H.S. Thompson
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius)
Subject: Re: Morality- Alarming results
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 18:28:35 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <1992Jul29.035035.16360@zooid.guild.org> Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org> writes:
>
>Once a apon time 14 year old could marry and then support his family
>working in the fields.  Nowadays no 14 year could support his family
>and would be great burden on society.  So, it seems to me to be very
>reasonable for modern society to discourage 14 years old from having
>sex, just like I think it's reasonable for an goverment to impose speed
>limits that save lives.

That's a really good idea!  In California, anyone driving must possess
proof of insurance, or proof of a sufficiently large bond.  How about
adapting that to sex?  Now, everyone can ask to sex your sex license,
which you won't receive unless you have child insurance or a reasonable
facsimile thereof......

Remember, you heard it here first.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Babbage's Birthday Bargain Bash -- December 26th, 1992
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max)
Subject: Re: Starry, Starry Night
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 21:37:50 GMT

In article <92201.34487.NMICELI@avm.cc.fsu.edu> NMICELI@avm.cc.fsu.edu writes:
>>Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
>
>>Nothing better to do huh?
>>I'm outa here, much to long a work day for a Saturday....
>
>     Northwestern, huh...(And is that Dr. Max, rather than
>     a mere grad student (g)? Please forgive my mistake in the
>     previous post, if that's the case.)  In what field are you
>     working?
>
>     And what's going on in the greater Chicagoland area?
>     (Besides da Cubs and da Sox?)


Do you realize that you are posting questions that are directed solely at
me to over 80,000 people? Do you really think I'm likely to answer them?
From: zooid.guild.org!ross@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: E.W. - Net. Impersonation .....again!
Date: 23 Jul 92 00:27:00 GMT
Organization: ZOOiD BBS
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>As a very serious and responsible member of this group, I feel 
>I have to point out that I am fairly convinced that a certain
>person under the pseudonym "Mark Hopkins" is, in fact, really
>a woman.

Awww... Emma, why did you have go and ruin it for the rest of us?

       Ross Ridge

-- 
Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU          l/  //
            [OO][oo]
ross@zooid.guild.org          /()\/()/
uunet.ca!zooid!ross           db  //
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjj@mits.mdata.fi (Joni Jarvenkyla)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 16:21:03 GMT

In article <1992Jul25.204607.29460@cs.hw.ac.uk> neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite) writes:
>Normally in most developed countries (no racism bitching me puhlease !!)
>the age for heterosexual consent is 16 years old.
>
>Would you if you had the chance ??

Yes I would if I was around 16, too. Actually I started at 15 and see
nothing wrong with it - it's just a question of not being lured
thinking "I'm an adult now".

And if we wouldn't think of a relationship - yes it could be fun
"for kicks".

Actually I think that something like 13 or 14 would be an ok age for
starting a relationship: you'd have time and playfulness to grow into
one well-functioning social unit. When you'd have the "physical needs"
fulfilled you could go for the mental growth.

It really bugs me when people keep "the sex thing" so much to
themselves; I think it's utterly absurdly funny to hear the "let's be
friends" and on the other hand see them going after "serious
relationships" anyway, just like they'd be SCARED of the whole thing and
just running in hope finding somebody to TEACH them then very basic
idea: How To Have Sex. It's the question of love, and that way the
question of paying attention, giving and taking - all in all, humanity.

-- 
jjj@mits.mdata.fi             Kirjoitatko sin{ n{it{ ihan selvin p{in?
jjj@niksula.hut.fi                          -Petteri J{rvinen
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: dpollard@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Dennis B Pollard)
Subject: Re: Morality- Alarming results
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 17:53:54 GMT

In article <3781@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> gswst@gl.pitt.edu (Gary S Wachs) write
s:
>Hey folks,
>
> I read somewhere, can't remember where, about the results of a morality
>questionaire.  A few thousand adult males in an urban area were polled,
>if I remember correctly.  Two particularly disappointing points that stuck in
>my head were the following questions:
>
> 1. Have you ever seriously considered raping a woman?
>     the "Yes"'s were somewhere in the 10-15% area
>
> 2. Do you think you could ever actually rape a woman if you were
>    given assurance that you could not get caught?
>     the "Yes"'s skyrocketed to somewhere in the 50-70% area this time.
>

From what I remember, the results of this national poll was MUCH higher.  For 
Question #1, the result was closer to 50%, and for Question #2, the result was 
closer to 90%.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: charleen@ADS.COM (Charleen Bunjiovianna)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,ba.singles
Subject: Re: Looking for Cathleen Greenberg
Date: 21 Jul 92 20:31:19 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: The Original Estrogen-Crazed Lust Bunnies

In article <1992Jul21.190541.5019@island.COM> don@island.COM (Don Hermes) writes:
>In article <1992Jul20.010426.10315@nmsu.edu> honest@acca.nmsu.edu (Shower with a Friend) writes:
>>
>>I am looking for Cathleen Greenberg, she was in Stanford University
>>and moved to East Coast at Yale or Cornell or Harvard to study medicine
>>I would appreciate if you know where she is, Cathleen Greenberg - if you
>>read this please reply??
>
>Oh no, Not her.

Don.  I'm disappointed in you.  I thought we agreed we weren't going
to talk about Cathleen again, especially after what she did.

Charleen

--
Sudafed:  If Shirley MacLaine is right, you've got nothing to worry about.
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Used threads
Date: 23 Jul 92 14:26:35 GMT
	<1992Jul22.200907.9635@zooid.guild.org>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: ross@zooid.guild.org's message of 22 Jul 92 20:09:07 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.200907.9635@zooid.guild.org> ross@zooid.guild.org (Ross Ridge) writes:

   >Can you keep yourself from verbally attacking the other person's
   >intelligence/character/etc. when you are arguing with them ?

   By arguing with a person you are by definition attacking the other
   person's intelligence and character.  Since I think you're wrong,
   obviously I think there is something wrong with your intelligence
   and character.  It may be a small little thing, but still it's
   something I think is wrong about you.

WRONG!

:-)

Seriously, this is just what leads to the sorts of flame wars we
occasionally see.  There's a lot of difference between "your argument is
wrong" and "there is something wrong with you".  Argument CAN BE an
opportunity for the dialectic process to arrive at new conclusions or
for information to be exchanged among people.  But for this to be true,
we have to mutually assume that the others are sincerely trying to
arrive at the Truth; we must be sincerely trying to find Truth
ourselves; and we have to have some kind of epistomological basis for
what we are calling "truth".

This is not to say that the process can't sometimes lead us to believe
that there is something wrong with someone's character or intelligence.
I certainly lose a lot of respect for anyone who persists in announcing
that no amount of data and no appeal to scientific studies will change
his or her opinion about a scientific or medical fact.
--

Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens. -- Schiller
Ergo bibamus! -- Goethe
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com (PuterDude)
Subject: Re: Comment on men's hair length
Organization: None, today. Thank you.
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 17:40:23 GMT

 intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) goes in an animal rage...

>> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>>
>>ps: part of the 'looks' is a matter of how we deal with
>>ourselves as people. 
>
>Oh sure, that's easy for *you* to say.  But how about how we deal with
>ourselves as animals?  As lust-crazed beasties?  Well?  Then what?  I'm
>waiting, mister! 

Marry a bunny rabbit. Wait no longer, miss!

>Angelwing - I finally had an acid flashback.

Pepto-Bismol is good for that acid feelin'.

-- 
Puter	puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com	.sig by Generic Labels
(Put obnoxious title here)		(Put phone # here.)
(Put irritating quote here. Please make it as long as possible.)
From: i900019@redgum.ucnv.edu.au (Tim Knipe)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Oh No!  I'm still a Nice Guy!
Date: 23 Jul 92 10:42:32 GMT
Organization: UCNV, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Sorry, I don't know what came over me.  Must have been a bad hair day
or something.  :-)

I asked her out (hey, that wasn't so bad!), she said ok, we had a good
time but I didn't express my interest (sort of wimped out again I suppose).
I'll just have to do it next time if not sooner! :)

--
Tim Knipe
i900019@redgum.ucnv.edu.au 

"You're flashing eyes
 and sudden smiles
 are never quite
 at ease and neither am I.
 Oh we'll talk about
 it all some night
 but nervously we
 never get it right." - Pet Shop Boys.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: browns@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Stuart Brown)
Subject: Re: Where Is alt.sex ?
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 20:14:51 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.040831.19674@unlinfo.unl.edu> jam@cse.unl.edu (James Macfarlane) writes:
>In <1992Jul17.151404.1@camins.camosun.bc.ca> comptec91065@camins.camosun.bc.ca writes:
>
>>My node does not carry alt.sex or alt anything for that matter.
>>I have FTP access or whatever that is that lets you log on to remote sites over
>>the network. Do you know a way I can reroute myself to get alt.sex ?
>>and/or can you give me an e-mail address that would get to alt.sex ?
>
>My site is the same way, not that I especially want alt.sex, but some of the
>alt.* ones are ok. There is a way to do it, but right off I don't remember
>how, so when I find out, I'll try to remember to let you know.
>
>James
>
>--
>
>James A. MacFarlane    |                           | 2500 S. 10th St.  #30
>jam@cse.unl.edu        |    THIS SPACE FOR RENT    | Lincoln, NE  68502-3439
>University of Nebraska |                           | voice: (402)438-6632

Try using Gopher to access USENET from another site that is not so narrow
minded.
-- 
Stuart M. Brown                               Postdocs rush in where wise men
U. of Manitoba, Dept. Plant Science, Canada       Fear to tread. 
browns@ccu.umanitoba.ca        
				Disclaimer?? Sure: "That Disc is Mine!"
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: seeking higher ground
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 02:30:57 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <2152@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com> luzenko@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com (Bill Luzenko) writes:

>In soc.singles I find that men comments are six times the womens.
>And when a women is involved in three times out of five we have a
>battle of the  sexes.  Anyone  can  project  this  confidence  in
>themselves  that polarizes one against the other. I would use the
>bandwith to get down to details to find the infinitesimal  common
>ground  which would yield the faintest echo of cordial thaught as
>hard as it may seem.

>So if someone out there is trying to avoid the current pitfall or
>name  dropping and the male beachmaster mentality/ female lack of
>a certain hormone lets talk!!

If I could figure out what you were talking about, I might reply
with more substance.  Nice formatting, though, and a little more
cordial than your first post.

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Heaven knows / No frontiers
And I've seen heaven in your eyes			- Jimmy McCarthy
From: dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: about Instruction and Advice for the Young Bride
Date: 31 Jul 92 15:31:24 GMT
Reply-To: dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

Quite a few people have sent me requests for more info on the article I've 
been taking my sig quotes from lately, so it looks like there's enough 
interest to answer the questions publicly.

The complete heading is:

Instruction and Advice for the Young Bride

On the Conduct and Procedure of the Intimate and Personal Relationships of
the Marriage State for the Greater Spiritual Sanctity of this Blessed
Sacrament and the Glory of God by Ruth Smythers, beloved wife of the 
Reverend L.D. Smythers of the Arcadian Methodist Church of the Eastern
Regional Conference.  Published in the year of our Lord, 1894, Spiritual
Guidance Press, New York City.

My sweetie found it reprinted in an OTO newsletter.  They say that they
heard it being read on a talk show sex advice radio program.  I have no
idea where it was reprinted, and I doubt that many people will be tripping
over too many OTO newsletters in the near future.  Since it's pretty 
short and apparantly not copyrighted and I've gotten a lot of requests
for it, I've decided to go ahead and post it.  I've been having a lot of
fun giving it away as wedding shower gifts to my co-workers fiancees.
You all might like to do the same.

The spelling and punctuation in the original is a bit weird.  I probably
haven't made it any better by typing it in.  I didn't correct any of the
original oddities.

I'll post it next.  If you don't want to see it, just type 'n'.
Newsgroups: soc.singles