HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cowboys KILL Eagles
Date: 12 Jan 1993 13:45:59 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <schnitzi.726806916@eola.cs.ucf.edu> schnitzi@cs.ucf.edu (Mark Schnitzius) writes:
>
>Agreed; what I was objecting to was Ray's posting an article full of trash
>talking, then wrapping it up by acting like he's above it.  That makes him
>a hypocrite, and a discredit to Dallas fans who accepted the win
>graciously.
>
>>Although I give credit when due, the Eagles although they did talk a load 

There's a few differences here.  I didn't talk trash BEFORE the
game like so many Philly fans did.  They all waste their time 
trying to convince each other that their precious Birds will
again come out on top somehow, whether it be due to Jerome Brown,
Andre "Dirty" Waters' idle threats, or the Cowboys being scared
of them.  Second, my commentary about the Eagles was my opinion
of the team that I've watched over the past 6 years (since Buddy
Ryan arrived).  I never woofed about how the Cowboys will keep
beating Philly or what the Cowboys will do the rest of the way.
I have been watching the game too long to know that next season
comes around real quick.

>I'll have to admit that there was a lot of pregame trash-talking done by
>Eagles fans; however, to be fair, both sides are guilty, though the Eagles
>fans are probably more so.  The best way to prove you are above it is by
>example, which Ray failed to do.
>
>Congrats to the Cowboys.  We'll see you next year.
>

Did I talk any trash last week BEFORE the game??  No, I didn't.
I was confident that the better team would win, which it did.
You might not like my unflattering comments about your team, but
realize that they are my opinions, passed off as such, and not
unfounded woofing about the outcome of an upcoming game.  But,
you're right, Eagle fans did more woofing and pregame trash
talking.  What I also pointed out was that the Eagle players were
guilty of this also, something a team in desparation to win a
Super Bowl should be more wary of.



Ray    GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: markl@spuddy.uucp (Mark Liversedge)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: THE BUFFALO BILLS READY TO SQUISH THE FISH!! : )
Date: 12 Jan 93 14:35:24 GMT
Organization: Spuddy's Public Usenet Domain

In article <1993Jan11.145512.27680@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>In article <1993Jan11.040155.13427@ncsu.edu> rdarnese@eos.ncsu.edu (RICHARD DALHS ARNESEN) writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>  It was clearly evident that the same luck that occured against the first
>>  Bills-Dolphins game reared its' ugly head against the Chargers. It's a 
>>  one-game deal, and it only occurs once in a blue moon. You can thank
>>  Humphries' bad pass selection for your win... shutout or not. Thurman
>>  Thomas is still the man, and the Bills are pumped up and ready!!!
>>  No one slides in to get the AFC East and comes out alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Wow... talk about over-hyped...  Chill...  "one-game deal???"  Well, the
>Fins man-handled the Bills in Buffalo, and then did the same for the 1st
>half in Miami.  The Bills responded with a great comeback and won the game,
>but only by 6 points..  I don't think that's all that convincing.  Miami
>beat the Chargers 31-0...  Though 21 pts came thanx to great field position
>after the turnovers, Miami still had to put the ball in the endzone (as opposed
>to FG) against one of the NFL's premier defenses.  
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Any stats available to back up this statement? (I have none).

>
>11-5, sliding in???  The way I look at it, Miami let Buffalo "slide" back
>into the lead for a few games, just to get them overconfident, and then
>took it back when it mattered.  
Buffalo also had an 11-5 record... and headed the AFC for most of the
season...

>>  
>>
>>  It's time for Buffalo to brush the Fish aside, and win the Super Bowl!! :)
>>
>
>Well, they have had 2 tries, and haven't done so well...  Time for some new
>blood, an organization that knows what it is like to win the Big One...
>
Fine - but they have forgotten how to get there for a long while...

>Miami vs. Dallas this time around....
Nah! Buffalo vs SF.

Whatever, Miami vs Buffalo is real hard to call, they have one each this
season,  have both peaked and troughed and hopefully are BOTH at a good
state for the Conf championships.

I am hoping for a Buff win, but reckon it will only be by a FG or TD...
maybe in overtime. Watch for Oliver being pulled forward by Reed only to
see Beebe/Lofton sting downfield... K.Davis will probably gain more yards
than Thurman Thomas.


-- 

 * Meeeow ! Call Spuddy on (0203) 638780/638693 for FREE mail & Usenet access *
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes)
Subject: Dolphins winnnnnnnnn
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 23:16:28 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NARC Atlanta
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1.3 PL5


The fourth quater ahs just started and the Fish look certain to win.
I think the score is now 21 - 0. When I get done posting it will
probably be 40 -0.



Lets get to it!

Bills and Fish!

Goooooo BiiiiiiLLLLLLLLLLLLLLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

I hate sea food!
From: dtokarew@tokafew.Doc.Provo.Novell.COM (Deb Tokarewich)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Niners Defeat Deadskins, Selves
Date: 11 Jan 93 16:32:25 GMT
Organization: Novell, Inc.

In article <1993Jan10.100208.22485@Princeton.EDU>  
niepornt@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Marc Nieporent) writes:

> Bull.  The Forty-niners won.  Steve Young didn't win.  Quarterbacks
> don't win at all.  Teams do.  (This isn't to say that Steve Young isn't
> a good quarterback -- he is, of course.  But he didn't play well today.)

Wonderful "theory," isn't it?  And it's more than just a theory, it's the  
truth--in any team sport.  So let's just remember it if and when the 49ers  
don't make it to (or make it but don't win) the Superbowl.  Will there be  
no Young-bashing if that happens?  Will there be no outcries to bring St.  
Joe back?  We'll see...
From: kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: More predictions
Date: 11 Jan 93 14:13:22 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: UB

In article <IfIEWUi00WDKM8EZ5Y@andrew.cmu.edu> vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu (Vernon H Harmon) writes:
>Excerpts from netnews.rec.sport.football.pro: 11-Jan-93 Re: More
>> Buffalo 35  Miami 17
>> Buffalo has too much offense for Miami's defense, and just enough
>> defense for Miami's O.  Miami has been inconsistent at times.  I
>> shouldn't go against Shula, and I'd like to see the rematch with the
>> Cowboys, but I'm taking Buffalo for a record tying 3rd consecutive SB
>> appearance.
>
>I'm looking for Miami to pull this one out for a number of reasons:
>1) home field.

Buffalo won in Miami this year, 26 to 20.

>2) Marino.
>3) Buffalo's heads are ballooning again.

Buffalo is calm. Where do you get the idea that their heads are ballooning?
It is Miami (as usual) that is too cocky for their own good. Louis Oliver
must have thought disco was back in style after his interception yesterday.

>4) As you say, if Buffalo wins they will tie Miami's record for 3
>concesutive SB appearances. Anyone who pays attention will notice that
>anytime someone comes close to an undefeated season one team always
>prevents it: Miami. Shula has a knack for motivating his troops to
>preserve the records Miami holds.
>5) Olividati (sp?) did a great job coming up with a great defensive
>strategy against Buffalo in their first match-up and against SD this
>week. I look for him to do so again.
>6) Pittsburgh sucked last week, and we saw what a hot passing team can
>do against Buffalo two weeks ago. I expect something along the lines of
>the Houston game, but without the defensive collapse by Miami in the
>second half (not *quite* as many points though).

Pittsburgh sucked, but compared to San Diego, looked great.


>
>--Vernon.

--Jim
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jmartin@ntmtv.UUCP (Jeff Martin)
Subject: Re: A question for Eagle fans....
Originator: jmartin@cleomed
Reply-To: jmartin@ntmtv.UUCP (Jeff Martin)
Organization: Northern Telecom Inc, Mountain View, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 15:28:16 GMT


> "Jim Wiener" <ames!puhep1.princeton.edu!wiener> writes:
>These guys play their show purely for laughs.

I guess I have a different tastes in hummor.

>
>It kills me when morons try to attack the media or fans in one NFL city
>as ignorant, irresponsible, or in general inferior to the media or
>fans in other cities. In the course of my work I happen to travel 
>all over the country and I can assure you that all the fans and media
>everywhere are identical. 
>

.. And it kills me when self-important assholes dismiss the 
sincere questions of others at the same time proving their
their own profound ignorance of the subject they are addressing.

If Mr. Wiener had read and comprehended what I wrote he would
have understood I only attacked the two Philly media personalities
I had been exposed to, not the market as a whole or its fans. My 
question was whether these "professionals"  were representitive of
that market. He extrapolated it over the whole Eagle dominion.

More thoughtful replies lead me to conclude these broadcasters are 
infact in the fringe of mainstream of Philly media and are considered by
many, who posted, to be the clowns I took them for.

I may not be as well traveled as Mr. Wiener but I'll comment on the
two NFL cities in which I have lived for an extended period of time.
(I would not be as bold as to draw general conclusions from the
cites I have "traveled" through, then again I'm obviously not as worldly 
as Mr. Wiener).

Neither San Franscisco or Dallas have the types of media personalities
discussed in the original post. I doubt that such "entertainment" would
find much of an audience among sports fans in those markets. Not to
say that Dallas/SF don't have a number of homeys, just that the line
of acceptable woofing stops this side of endorsing injury, even in jest,
to opposing teams. (I do not speak for the other 26 NFL markets or
their fans).

>I guarantee I can find media personalities in Dallas saying the same types
>of stupid things to try and pump themselves and their shows up.
>

You can guarantee nothing of the sort because such media personalities
don't exist in Dallas (or SF for that mmatter).  They don't find success 
here(there). You obviously don't know what your talking about.

Jeff Martin
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kettler@pierre.mit.edu (KETTLER, THOMAS R.)
Subject: Woody was fired! (Was: Re: Musburger, another ass)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Organization: MIT Lab for Nuclear Science
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 01:01:00 GMT

In article <1993Jan8.171558.23297@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>, 
stamber@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Kevin L. St writes...
>     Gary, what do you expect of someone who jumped ship in a perfect
>position at another network to start at the start with another network,
>calling little league world series games and other such second rate
>sports, all the while attempting to make it seem as though the fate of
>the free world rests upon whether or not little Billy can knock the cover
>off of a fastball thrown by a twenty year old.

>Kevin L. Stamber
>Purdue University
> 
>COWHER POWER!
> 
Although I have not agreed with what my fellow Northwestern alumnus Brent Woody 
Musburger says often (Yes, his middle name is Woody!), but I think that I 
should at least set the facts straight. He didn't jump ship at CBS in 1990 to 
go to ABC, but was instead fired by CBS on April 1st, the afternoon before the 
NCAA Finals in Men's Basketball where he did play-by-play. In fact, the AP sat 
on the story for two hours fearing an April Fools' Day prank.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes)
Subject: Re: Ditka in Denver
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 14:12:54 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NARC Atlanta
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1.3 PL5

Ah! The poor typing skills police got me! " interesting "
From: cwalker@Pterodactyl.scg.hac.com (Clint Walker)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Random Dallas THoughts
Date: 12 Jan 93 00:11:28 GMT
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Ground Systems Group, Fullerton, CA

It is very nice to see Dallas return to NFC Championship Game after such
a long absence (at least by Dallas standards).  This was Jimmy J.'s stated
goal from the beginning of the year.  I hope that the team now exceeds his
goal.

I was a little disturbed by the conservative style of play after the first
touchdown drive.  It seemed that the team was playing not to make a costly
mistake rather than playing aggressive offense.  Near the beginning of the
second quarter with the score 7-3, Dallas had the ball in their own
territory in a third and long situation.  Up to this point, the Eagles had
shown the ability to move the ball, so I was concerned when they called a
handoff up the middle to E. Smith and then punting the ball.  It appears 
that I was wrong based on the outcome of the game, but I wonder id this
conservative style of play will work against SF.  I think Dallas will have
to match SF score for score to win the game and the SF offense is 
certainly more potent than any that the Dallas defense has seen this year.

One thin that disturbs me about the current Cowboys is some of the 
classless displays that they are allowed to make after big plays,
Landry would not have tolerated in his days.  Actually, the only player 
that bothers me is Kenneth Gant.  His "dance" is more of a taunting 
nature than celebratory.  I don't mind enthusiastic celebration, but the
trash talking and taunting has got to go.

Clint Walker                           cwalker@hac2arpa.hac.com
From: vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu (Vernon H Harmon)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Oilers Top Ten!
Date: 6 Jan 93 10:47:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.8fGoJue00WDK82nY0v
Organization: Senior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Did anybody catch all top ten reasons that the Oilers lost on Letterman
last night?I saw them all, but couldn't get them all written down fast
enough. :(

--Vernon...*not* a Bills or Oilers fan.
From: ddrumm@amiganet.chi.il.us (Daniel Drumm)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: THE RETURN OF CRAP FOOTBALL
Date: 8 Jan 93 02:27:09 CST
Organization: Amiga Network Information Systems

In article <1993Jan6.131408.1@vaxa.strath.ac.uk>, clg292@vaxa.strath.ac.uk
writes:
>For the regular readers of this newsgroup, some of you might remember
>a couple a artilcles written intiled crap football, well it's back after
>a long absence.
>American footballers are nothing but a bunch of pumped up junkies.To call
>it a sport is an injustice to all proper sports.It seems to me more of
>a competition to see who can take the most steroids without killing 
>themselves, or getting caught.Well actually the chance of getting caught
>is remote as the teams and the N.F.L seem to condone the the use of these
>drugs, and are doing little to stop it.
>What's the punishment for being the best college footballer and getting
>caught using drugs? You get a mult-million dollar contract for one of
>the best teams in the country.Call me stupid, but it's hardly
>a deterent.
>It's time drugs abuse was stoped in football.Then again if
>they did that there would'nt be any decent players left.Without drugs
>your guys would'nt even get a game for a school rugby team over here.
>American Football is a sport? for wimps, and poofs without the commitment
>to make it without drugs.
>So chew on that you self-serving, arogant illigitimates.
>
>Real men play soccer
>
>Hamish
 
 
        Hey Hamish, if American football is so bloody sorry, then why are all
you poofters over there working so damn hard to get it started? I think I
remember a team called the London Monarchs, or something faux-royal (as is
everything over there) like that.
        If you are so damn worried about drugs in sports, try seeing if you can
get Maradona to stop sniffing blow.
 
        You guys have been cranky since 1776.
 
ddrumm@amiganet.chi.il.us
From: barrey@Novell.com (Barrey Jewall)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 49ers/Cowboys :QB problems? Thoughts?
Date: 7 Jan 93 18:16:35 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Novell, Inc.

In <1hvqirINNe1f@spim.mti.sgi.com> timl@zulu.mti.sgi.com (Tim Layman) writes:

>|> (SOMEBODY) writes:
>|> 
>|> 
>|> According to yesterday's SJMN:
>|> 
>|> New Orleans:	202 PA
>|> Pittsburgh:	225 PA
>|> San Francisco:	236 PA
>|> 
>|> with everybody else trailing.
>|> 
>|> Now where it really gets interesting:
>|> 
>|> San Francisco:	195 PF-PA
>|> Dallas:		166
>|> New Orleans:	128
>|> Minnesota:	125
>|> 

>In all fairness though, about 80 of those 195 PF-PA's came from the
>two Atlanta games. The first game of the season they beat the Giants by about
>14ish?
>(Somebody please help me with these numbers...) The two that they lost were
>Buffalo by 3 points and Phoenix by about 10ish so the negative side of those
>equations are pretty small.
>So the other 11 wins were by an average of about a touchdown and
>2/3rd's a field goal. That is ~100/11 = 9ish.

Just for the record, here is the season:

49ers	31	Giants	14	W
49ers	31	Bills	34	L
49ers	31	Jets	14	W
49ers	16	Saints	10	W
49ers	27	Rams	24	W
49ers	20	Patriots12	W
49ers	56	Falcons	17	W
49ers	14	Cards	24	L
49ers	41	Falcons	 3	W
49ers	21	Saints	20	W
49ers	27	Rams	10	W
49ers	20	Eagles	14	W
49ers	27	Dolphins 3	W
49ers	20	Vinkings17	W
49ers	21	Bucs	14	W
49ers	24	Lions	 6	W

_________________________________

49ers	427	Opponent	236

Difference = 	191

I don't know where the 195 point differential came from, but these are
the figures that I have...

>What I'm trying to say is that they didn't really trounce a lot of teams.
>In fact most of the games were pretty close. (Even New England!)
>Here's to a few blowouts in the playoffs :^) I don't think my heart can take
>much more of this.

Well, I wouldn't mind seeing the Niners blow out their playoff opponents,
if I were watching on TV, but when I go to the game, I want to see a good
game, like the Niners/Eagles game...

That said, I don't want the skins/Niners game to be QUITE that close...

Bah


--
+ Barrey Jewall - Network  Admin.++  and yea, though I walk through the shadow 
+ barrey@novell.com	         ++ of death, I shall fear no evil, for I am
+ Novell, Inc.- San Jose, Calif. ++ the meanest sonofabitch in the valley...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes)
Subject: Play off sites
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 17:58:08 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NARC Atlanta
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1.3 PL5


If. And it is a very big if!

The Bills beat P-burg

The Charges beat the Fish

Where will the playoff game be? Buffalo or San-Diego.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: nix@aslslc43.asl.dl.nec.com (David Nix)
Subject: The Best of Teams, the Worst of Teams
Organization: NEC America, Inc Irving TX
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 15:21:02 GMT

Go figure the Bills!  Having the biggest comeback in NFL history is a feather
in their cap, but it also means they were getting destroyed by Houston.  Will
the real Bills please stand up!  Outscored 63 to 6 for six quarters then going
on a 38-3 tear for 2+ quarters.  Buffalo just had one of the worst halfs in
NFL playoff history, followed by one of the best halfs in NFL history.

The Bills, whom I though were history in the playoffs without Kelley and with
Thomas banged up, have now advanced and have added a factor in their favor:
they are unpredictable and dangerous.  Don't expect any future Buffalo opponents
sit on a lead.

Nix

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: thaddeus@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Thaddeus R. Crews)
Subject: Re: Rookie Salary Cap
Organization: Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, Nashville, TN, USA
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 20:19:33 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.193217.4627@mksol.dseg.ti.com> dansmith@mcopn2.dseg.ti.com writes:
> Anyone have any details on the new rookie team salary cap of
> $2 million? Do all rookies contracts on a team have to TOTAL
> less than $2 million over the entire life of the contract
> (doesn't seem possible) or $2 million a year?
>

Please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe I read that the $2 million
cap is the TEAM TOTAL for all rookies (7 round draft plus additional
draft picks as compenstation for players lost to Free Agency).
HOWEVER, rookies may still get the big money signing bonus
(i.e. $5 million or more for the #1 pick overall) but the bonus will be
payed out evenly over the life of the contract rather than upfront as
it is usually done now.

The goal in this is to have more money to pay to proven players and
force the rookies to EARN thier big bucks.  I think this is the best
thing for both players and teams, with only the agents (*spit*) losing
out.
-- 
-- Thad Crews                             (email thaddeus@vuse.vanderbilt.edu)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I have a friend named Void and he is really upset.  He cannot cash
any of his paychecks..." 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: barrey@Novell.com (Barrey Jewall)
Subject: Re: The Niners pull one out! (thanks D!)
Organization: Novell, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 19:22:55 GMT

In <1993Jan8.214305.28976@novell.com> I speculate wildly:

>As a rabid (as in foaming at the mouth) 49er fan, the ONLY things I'm 
>confident about is that there will be a game played tomorrow, and that
>I'll be there!!!

Well, let's see.. I was right on both counts... 8-)

>I think that it will be a tough game, hope there are no serious injuries,
>and hope that the Niners will win it...

Fortunately, I was right on these also...

>The eagles fan should feel nervous, because unless their team has 
>a spectacular day, or Dallas has a bad day(not likely), they will
>be out of the playoffs come sunday night...

Don't know yet....

>GO NINERS!!! (woof)

Well, thanks to the niners D, and the skins ineptness, the niners won 
this game...

Bah
--
+ Barrey Jewall - Network  Admin.++  and yea, though I walk through the shadow 
+ barrey@novell.com	         ++ of death, I shall fear no evil, for I am
+ Novell, Inc.- San Jose, Calif. ++ the meanest sonofabitch in the valley...
From: gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills were LUCKY!!!!!!
Date: 5 Jan 93 20:06:43 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <C0D1op.6q6@acsu.buffalo.edu>, kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) w
rites:
>In article <C0BDxo.96J@acsu.buffalo.edu> carrato@acsu.buffalo.edu (Michael Carr
ato) writes:
>>krishna@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Krishna R Akkina) writes:
>>
>>>Givins.  I think all this just led to the Bills being LUCKY!!!!  Go ahead and

>>>respond anyone.  I would like to see how you can deny they weren't lucky.
>>
>>They were lucky. Very lucky. They basically had to have everything
>>go their way, and everything DID go their way.
>>
>>But from another perspective you could say they were unlucky to be playing
>>without 4 starters, 3 of them pro-bowlers, including their entire starting
>>offensive backfield.
>>
>>Bad calls happen in nearly every game. Even with instant replay you can't
>>avoid bad calls, so teams have to deal with it. I'm thrilled they went
>>the Bills way on this day, but next week it may be different and I'll
>>be whining about how we got screwed! :-)
>
>Let's not forget the bad call against Bruce Smith for a legitimate tackle
>of Warren Moon. The non-call against Beebe was just bad officiating (as has
Bad call?  Some college wrestlers would love to have that takedown.


>been the case in SO many games this year), but when Darryl Talley made
>contact with Givins, I think it might have been within five yards of the
>line of scrimmage, making it a legal and heads up play on Talley's part.
>
>>
>>>A Disgruntled Oilers fan and an Ecstatic Eagles fan.
>>
>>Well, at least ONE of the comebacks went your way today!
>>
>>
>>Mike C.
>
-- 

------------------------
|   Gail A. Fullman    |
|   Manager - ADMO     |
|   Ext. 83113         |
------------------------