HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rjones@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Ronald Jones)
Subject: Re: Pmcomm32
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 13:52:08 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.201002.28439@ultb.isc.rit.edu> djs6015@ultb.rit.edu (Don Smith) writes:
>I had a lot of problems with PMCOMM 1.10, with the emulations and 
>such. I'd like to give the new version a try, where can I ftp it
>from?
>
>Any help is appreciated. Thanks
>

PMcomm32 is available for download from the Multinet BBS to registered
users of PMcomm. They also have upto date versions of PMcomm available
there. I don't think there is any shareware access for this program. It
is still in beta but seems very solid. I've been using it for a few
days with no problems.

PS. I would recommend PMcomm to Procomm+ users. It has some of the same
key commands but with a slicker interface. Z-modem works well for me. I
have not found any problems with ANSI emulation that I can attribute to 
the program.



-- 
 < Ron Jones                   |    E-mail:       rj+@osu.edu   > 
 < The Ohio State University   |    Office:      (614) 292-1665 >
 < 338 West Tenth Avenue       |    FAX:(9-5PM)  (614) 292-7151 > 
 < Columbus, Ohio 43210        |        "eschew obfuscation"    >      
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: FAGER@gribb.hsr.no (Fagerland, Svein      94/96)
Subject: Soundblaster PRO drivers for MMPM/2
Keywords: SB PRO / MMPM/2
Organization: Rogaland University Centre
Distribution: comp.sys.os2 comp.sys.os2.apps comp.sys.os2.misc
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 08:38:22 GMT

Are there OS/2 2.0 MMPM/2 soundblaster drivers available from anywhere ?
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Subject: Re: Uncompress
Reply-To: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Organization: Columbia University, New York
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 05:44:00 GMT

In article <DENS.92Aug28123319@spotted.owlnet.rice.edu> dens@spotted.owlnet.rice.edu (Dennis Allen Schmitz) writes:
>In article <1992Aug28.073813.8925@midway.uchicago.edu> jhrv@ellis.uchicago.edu (John M. Kim) writes:
>
>   >jhrv@ellis.uchicago.edu (John M. Kim) writes:
>   >
>   >>copy compress.exe uncompress.exe
>   >>copy compress.exe zcat.exe

>Or, for even less disk space:
>
>alias uncompress compress -d
>alias zcat compress -dc

Oh!?  Did you port ksh :-)
or are you using 4os2?

Anybody want to tackle porting bash to os/2?
*Please*?!  :-)

 * * * * *  =================== Internet address is  mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
* * * * * * == Meir I. Green == Amateur Packet Radio N2JPG@W2XO.PA.USA.NOAM
 * * * * *  = mig@columbia.edu= Amateur Packet Radio N2JPG@K2KJC.NY.USA.NOAM
* * * * * * =================== Amateur TCP/IP       N2JPG@uhm.ampr.org
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Subject: Re: Which is better: pmcomm or te2?
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 23:15:35 GMT
Keywords: pmcomm te2 comms (TE/2 vt100 emulation)

In article <n1fn-v=.genie@netcom.com> genie@netcom.com (The Genie) writes:
> In article <92Aug29.145122edt.12046@roll.db.toronto.edu> panos@db.toronto.edu (Panos Economopoulos) writes:
> >Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes:
> >
> >> ...... 
> >>refresh. I also bought TE/2 because PMComm's VT100 was not as good as TE/2.
> >>This was probably the main difference for me as reasonably VT100 is critical
> >>for my comms activities. 
> >> .......
> >
> >Strange. vt100 emulation is critical for me, too. I login to UNIX systems
> >and "vi" is my text editor. I tried TE/2 but abandonded it very shortly
> >since when running "vi" in a TE/2 session, even hopping from one word
> >to the next (with the vi command 'w') erases the previous word.
> >One gets tired of hitting ctl-L continually.  There were also some other
> >problems with the vt100 emulation that I've noted down somewhere but
> >don't remember off the top of my head.
> >
> 
> I've had the same experience with TE/2.  The vt100 terminal emulation
> is not good.  I use the jove text editor and pressing keystrokes like
> CNTRL-F (move the cursor to the right one space) will erase the
> previous character on my screen.  And I too end up pressing
> CNTRL-L many times to get the screen to refresh correctly.  This
> is particularly bad when programming since I find it necessary
> to see what's been typed before.
> 
> The last time this happened was when I used Telix.  But I fixed that
> problem by setting the "destructive backspace off".  I tried doing
> this same thing with TE/2 by modifying the te.ini file, but
> still continues to erase characters off the screen.  For now, back
> to Telix!
> 
> Gene

Perhaps it is just the host I login to. I use the joe editor and TE/2 handles
it better than any other OS/2 comms program I have tried (that also has
Zmodem). TE/2 doesn't work so well under the EVE editor on a VAX host I also
call, but then niether does *any* comms program I have *ever* used......:-)
 
Steve
 
-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | End the two-party duopoly. Vote 
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         | for the Mixed-Member Proportional 
withers_s@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz            | (MMP) voting system on Sept. 19th. 
**** Happy user of OS/2 v2!! ****       | Give yourself a vote that *counts*!
From: michael@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Michael MacFarland)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: FAX/PM for $99.00 (IBM OS/2 Soloutions Coupon Book )
Date: 1 Sep 92 18:41:40 GMT
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.

In article <13860@chalmers.se> d9mikael@dtek.chalmers.se (Mikael Wahlgren)
writes: 
>I just received PMFax (or FAXit, the manual says PMFax and the diskette
>says FAXit). Anyhow, it seems a pretty good package, with a FAX/Printer-
>driver.  On the negative side, is that it only handles Class 2 faxes (and
>that spec isn't even finalized!!!), and I happen to have a Class 1 faxmodem,
>so the program is just vaste of harddisk space...
>
>The documentation says that they plan it for version 1.10, but they are
>currently only at version 1.05, so I don't know when to put the program
>to use...

I have been struggling with this problem also.  SofNet has been very
helpful, the class 1 faxmodem software driver that will work with 1.05 is
on their bbs  (404)984-9926 in a file called faxfm.exe.  It is self
extracting.  You then have to copy the resulting file (faxfm.adp) to
fax.adp.  Unfortunetly I have not managed to get this to work with my new
Practical Peripherals PM14400FXSA V32.bis modem.  Scott Taylor, SofNets
tech support rep for PMFAX (Faxit) is working with me on the problem.  If
interested send me a note and if I get a solution I will send it off to you
also or you could call Scott directly @ 404-984-9958

Has anyone got PMFAX to work with Practical Peripherals PM14400FXSA fax/modem?
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: harris@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Michael Harris)
Subject: Re: CHANGING MOUSE POINTER
Keywords: mouse pointer
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 13:15:18 GMT

unruh@physics.ubc.ca (William Unruh) writes:

>harris@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Michael Harris) writes:

>>FAGER@gribb.hsr.no (Fagerland, Svein      94/96) writes:

>>>Is there a way to change the mouse-pointer in OS/2 ?
>>>I've noticed that there is an option in the icon editor for pointers.

>>This option is to create a custom pointer image to put in your program.
>>There is no way to change the default pointer short of using a resource
>>editor on your DISPLAY.DLL.

>Is there a way of reattaching the mouse pointer? I have had a program
>attach the mouse pointer to a completely transparent one and then bomb,
>leaving it transparent ( slightly difficult to use). How can I reattach?

I think what may have happened is that your program HID the mouse pointer.
If this ever happens and you can somehow bring up the OS/2 System Editor or
a MLE. This will usually solve the problem.  (I haven't tried this in 2.0 yet.)

The OS/2 MLE in 1.3 had code in it to explicitly show the pointer as many times
as necessary to make it visible.  Now, if you don't understand how the OS/2
pointer is hidden, that last sentence will sound confusing.  The OS/2 pointer
has what is called a "hide level" similar to a use count.  Basically, each
time you hide the pointer, it increments a number somewhere.  When you show
the pointer it decrements the number.  When the number is equal to zero, the
mouse pointer is visible.  The hide level can never be negative.  (ie. showing
a pointer that is visible will do nothing to the hide level.)

______________________________________________________________________________
     Michael Harris - harris@catt.ncsu.edu or harris@carvm3.vnet.ibm.com
 System Administrator, Computer & Technologies Theme Program, NC State Univ.
(My opinions are my own and do not represent those of NCSU or IBM Corporation)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: db3l@ans.net (David Bolen)
Subject: Re: Locking OS/2 on boot  (passwd protection)
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 17:09:18 GMT
Organization: Advanced Network & Services, Inc. - Elmsford, NY

In article <BtnA98.30@news.cso.uiuc.edu> btf57346@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Byron "Bohr" Faber) writes:

>Ok.  I like os/2's password protection, but does anybody have an idea
>how to get it to lock up on boot.  It doesn't do me much good if it
>will only look up after 3 minutes idle, or if I tell it to.

(To quickly answer the question - no, I'm not sure how to do this, but...)

While it might be nice to have it lock upon boot (so you could start your
machine rebooting and then walk away to do something before it finished
coming up), this sort of feature isn't really going to add much in the way
of protection.

While the lock facility in OS/2 is pretty nice - if you are really
concerned with securing your system, including for the cases where someone
just comes up and reboots, you really have to have a system lock facility
(ala AMI Bios, PS/2's etc..).  Otherwise, your system is always exposed to
a diskette boot or someone being able to interrupt your boot cycle in time
to prevent any automatic "lock-upon-boot".

--
-- David
--
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------\
 \              David Bolen             \  Internet: db3l@ans.net      /
  |   Advanced Network & Services, Inc.   \   Phone: (914) 789-5327   |
 / 100 Clearbrook Road, Elmsford, NY 10523  \   Fax: (914) 789-5310    \
\-----------------------------------------------------------------------/
From: ray@hrtpc.cmhnet.org (Ray Thornton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: request repost thread about killer app for OS/2
Keywords: Frame Maker, Lotus
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 14:02:55 EDT
Organization: P.W. Publishing Company, Columbus, Ohio USA

Greetings,

Would someone please re-post the summary to the thread about
a `kill app' for OS/2. I was (still am) new to OS/2 then and
did not comment.

Aside from OS/2 being `killer`, I would (if I had any say)
go after Frame Maker as the `killer app.` It is a do-
everything-under-the-sun type package akin to the current
OS/2 2.0.

But there should more. I just sat thru one of those Win 3.1
seminars and kept thinking to myself why not for OS/2?

The seminar featured Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Project.
For a limited time (with a seminar form) you could purchase
their office package that included Word, Excel, PowerPoint
and Windows Mail. All MS products for Windows, naturally.

I would suggest IBM work with Lotus to port their office
package (Smart Suite) to OS/2. It includes AmiPro, 1-2-3, 
Freelance Graphics and cc:Mail.  I'm not sure what they 
offer against Project for Windows.  In any case Project is 
offered separately.

I understand IBM has in house software R&D. but this would 
help them avoid the rap MS about withholding Windows
development from competitors. 

Active 3rd party products would make my boss alot more 
receptive to OS/2.


H. Ray Thornton
   (Thanks to Ross Perot, first initials are sexy again <g>)

BTW- Is Lotus offering cross-platform sales/upgrades on their
     Win\OS/2 computer products? Pathway from Win to OS/2?
     (Hey, I'm new and everyone in this town would rather
     sell me the product and let me find out for myself) #8-]


________________________________________
ray@hrtpc.cmhnet.org  Columbus, Ohio USA
From: Arylnn.Poczynek@ttlg.UUCP (Arylnn Poczynek)
Sender: postmaster@ttlg.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Wordperfect Os/2 --
Date: 31 Aug 92  11:19:02 mst

 -> WordPerfect only did V5.0 for OS/2. It looks just like the DOS 
 -> version.  

     And because it's only 5.0, it is missing a few features.  :-(

 -> I heard from an IBMer today that WordPerfect are *now* 
 -> advertising for WordPerfect V6.0 for OS/2 in a US mag.

     Only because they bought space a long time ago.  WPos2 6.0 is
not even in beta testing yet.  Wait until ComDex for some serious
information regarding release date and pricing (probably standard
pricing)

 -> This will be the *big* one. Watch for it. At the moment, you may 
 -> have to order OS/2 programs in stores. The more people who 
 -> order, the more likely stores are to have them on the shelves.

     In North America, WPCorp has a very strong marketing structure.
It will appear, almost guaranteed, in every WP store on the
continent.  Of course, their international marketing isn't quite as
strong.  Where are you serviced out of?  Sydney, the U.S. direct,
the U.K?  Get in touch with your regional/national marketing
representative by contacting the Pacific office in Sydney.  Get
information from him whenever possible.  He is NOT the best source
of inside information (WPCorp doesn't trust them to keep secrets)
but he will keep you up-to-date on the progress of WPos2.  Expect to
see the U.K. version released in numbers about two weeks after the
U.S. release.  Then it's a matter of how long it takes stock to make
it down there.

                                            ---Arylnn Poczynek---

___ Via Silver Xpress V3.00

 * Origin: Mach2 Vulcan OS/2 Systems 1-403-489-4250 (42:100/20)
From: jtm48888@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John T Monkman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: new! os/2 disk compressio
Date: 1 Sep 92 18:59:12 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

david@maxwell.ucsc.edu (David Darknell) writes:


>  has been "no demand for it!"  If you would like a coup of this
>  software at discount, and you are a bona fide college student, call
>  proportional at the 1-800 number above and request you student copy.
>  Perhaps if enough of us request a copy, they will make them
>  available!

I just called them, and they offered it to me for ~$85. I don't know if they
only do this for students though.

Has anybody tried this? Is it any good?

Jay Monkman
j-monkman@uiuc.edu
From: feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Which is better: pmcomm or te2?
Keywords: pmcomm te2 comms (TE/2 vt100 emulation)
Date: 1 Sep 92 23:48:55 GMT
Organization: DAFCO: OS/2 Software Support & Consulting

I attempted to upgrade to the first version of TE/2 that supported
external modems. I was unable to get it to work with my Telebit T2500
at all. Eventually I just gave up on it.
-- 
Dave Feustel N9MYI <feustel@netcom.com>
 
( New .sig under construction. Watch this space! )
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: linstee@dutecaj.et.tudelft.nl (Erik van Linstee)
Subject: Communications question (Terminal Plus).
Organization: Delft University of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 15:56:14 GMT

I am trying to get Terminal Plus (Windows comm. app.) to work under
OS2. Now the funny thing is, I can connect to my remote host and
have no problems using it, but as soon as I want to download using
ZModem the system screws up. I get a message saying there was an
error in the binary transfer. Now it gets even weirder since it
worked the first time I installed it, then didn't but would again
if I turned Monitor mode on, which in fact dumps everything that
is received to the output window, so I suspect timing is the problem.
So I tried some settings in de WINOS2 setup, like hold com port, which
worked... but not tonight, in fact monitor on now doesn't work either.
		(^musical break, insiders only :-))
Anyway, I would like to know if someone has tried to install Terminal
Plus under OS2, or has had similar problems with other comm. apps.
and solved them.

Erik

-- 
Erik van Linstee   |   linstee@duteca.et.tudelft.nl   |   I'll be back ... 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: clemens@faui8a.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Clemens Beckstein)
Subject: Re: TeX for OS/2
Organization: Regionales Rechenzentrum Erlangen
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 12:45:41 GMT

PETM@ibm.rz.tu-clausthal.de writes:

>Hello,
>I don't know which TeX version to use on my 486DX50 running OS/2.
>Is there any difference between earlier emTeX distributions and
>the current distribution at 129.69.1.12 respectively to the
>OS/2 files ?
> 
>Thanks,
>       Thomas M"uller (petm@ibm.rz.tu-clausthal.de)

Oh yes, there is!
You really should get the latest (beta) version of emtex when
running OS/2 2.0:
 - full 32bit (beta8)
 - new drivers (V1.4r)
 - previewer coupled with MetaFont to generate missing fonts
   on the fly (in background...:-))

In Europe: ftp.uni-stuttgart.de, /soft/tex/machines/pc/emtex/betatest

(the machine seems to be done at the moment for maintenance)

- Clemens
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: PETM@ibm.rz.tu-clausthal.de
Subject: TeX for OS/2
Organization: Rechenzentrum der TU CLAUSTHAL
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 09:05:46 GMT

Hello,
I don't know which TeX version to use on my 486DX50 running OS/2.
Is there any difference between earlier emTeX distributions and
the current distribution at 129.69.1.12 respectively to the
OS/2 files ?
 
Thanks,
       Thomas M"uller (petm@ibm.rz.tu-clausthal.de)
From: stanton@haas.berkeley.edu (Richard Stanton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: I'm getting monochrome (NOT solid black) icons
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 22:29:26 GMT
Organization: Haas School of Business, U.C. Berkeley
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: connor.berkeley.edu

I've seen occasional solid black icons, but I've just started getting some
black and white icons, rather than color. For example, my 4DOS full screen 
icon just went monochrome. The patter was there, but all color vanished. I
cured this by reattaching the icon from my 4OS2 directory, but this seems 
odd.

Has anyone else seen this? Is this related to "Black icon" syndrome? By the 
way, I'm running on an XGA display in high res. mode.

Richard Stanton
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: panos@db.toronto.edu (Panos Economopoulos)
Subject: Re: Which is better: pmcomm or te2?
Keywords: pmcomm te2 comms (TE/2 vt100 emulation)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Date: 29 Aug 92 18:51:26 GMT

Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes:

> ...... 
>refresh. I also bought TE/2 because PMComm's VT100 was not as good as TE/2.
>This was probably the main difference for me as reasonably VT100 is critical
>for my comms activities. 
> .......

Strange. vt100 emulation is critical for me, too. I login to UNIX systems
and "vi" is my text editor. I tried TE/2 but abandonded it very shortly
since when running "vi" in a TE/2 session, even hopping from one word
to the next (with the vi command 'w') erases the previous word.
One gets tired of hitting ctl-L continually.  There were also some other
problems with the vt100 emulation that I've noted down somewhere but
don't remember off the top of my head.

On the other hand, I have yet to find a flaw in the Softerm vt100/vt102
emulation. Flawless. (Now that I 've figured out how to set my default
up/download directory, I think I can live with it!)

> 
>Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | If you don't vote for MMP on 
>Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         |  September 19, 1992, then you 
>withers_s@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz            |  must like things the way they 
>**** Happy user of OS/2 v2!! ****       |  are.....can I live with YOU?


Panos Economopoulos --         panos@csri.toronto.edu      (ARPA/CSNet)
University of Toronto          {uunet, ...}!utcsri!panos   (UUCP)
                               panos@csri.utoronto	   (Bitnet)
                               panos@csri.toronto.cdn      (CDNnet/EAN/X.400)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: rommel@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Kai-Uwe Rommel)
Subject: Re: zip for os/2
Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 08:54:48 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.120409.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> hank@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:
>Warning: Kai Uwe Rommel indicated that there are some problems with the 32-bit
>zip and extended attributes (look for posts from him). The new zip stuff is
>in pub/downloads/Info-ZIP/ on ftp-os2.nmsu.edu.

I have replaced this version (32-bit) with a newer one which has this
bug fixed.

Kai Uwe Rommel

/* Kai Uwe Rommel --- rommel@informatik.tu-muenchen.de */

DOS ... is still a real mode only non-reentrant interrupt
handler, and always will be.                -Russell Williams

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: PETM@ibm.rz.tu-clausthal.de
Subject: Looking for TCL IMAGE
Organization: Rechenzentrum der TU CLAUSTHAL
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 11:17:11 GMT

Hello,
I'm looking for an image processing package called TCL IMAGE, but I
haven't found it yet. The manual for the OS9-Version says that there
exists such a os2 package but I don't knwo where (dealer, anonFTP) to
get it ...
Thanks,
        Thomas Mueller (petm@ibm.rz.tu-clausthal.de)
From: keating@casemo.UUCP (John Keating )
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Iconedit problem
Date: 25 Aug 92 22:15:01 GMT
Organization: Dowty Communications, Inc.

Howdy, folks, I'm back..  <Ominous thunder>

Today's problem is my Icon Editor.  Put simply, I can create and save icons,
but I can't Open them.  Similiarly, I cannot Edit an icon from the General
page of Settings.

Symptoms:  When trying to load the icon, the editor starts up, starts drawing
the PM window, gets to the foreground/background color choices, beeps, and
then closes.  No messages, no nuttin'.  Just a beep.

System:  PS/2 Model 80 w/ IBM 8514 card.  16 Megabytes of memory, 120 MB FD.

Any ideas?  Sympathy?  Spare Change?

John Keating

-- 
    John Wllm Keating, III      | mimsy.cs.umd.edu!casemo!keating
  Dowty Communications, Inc.    | 73737.733@compuserve.com
 formerly  CASE/Datatel, Inc.   | The above message may not correspond with the
                                | views of Dowty Communications, Inc. -JWK3-
From: btf57346@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Byron "Bohr" Faber)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Unix Crypt
Date: 29 Aug 92 20:42:13 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana


Does anybody out there know if there is an os/2 version of crypt
compatible with the Unix version.  If so could you tell me how to get 
it.

Thanks

Byron Faber

e-mail please.
-- 
Please Note:  Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest that When the Reader   
              Is Not Directly Observing This Message, It May Cease to Exist
              or Will Exist Only in a Vague and Undetermined State.
From: reisert@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Jim Reisert)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: What tool should I use to Print Screen in OS/2?
Date: 2 Sep 92 16:02:27 GMT
Reply-To: reisert@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Jim Reisert)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation -- Maynard, MA



How can I print screens to a printer in OS/2?  I hit the PrintScreen
key and nothing happens.  For example, I'd like to print a window as
if it were the only thing on the screen.  I found somethingn called
PMCamera, but couldn't make it work.

Thanks - Jim

--
James J. Reisert                Internet:  reisert@sttng.enet.dec.com
Digital Equipment Corp.         UUCP:      ...decwrl!sttng.enet!reisert
146 Main Street			Voice:     508-493-5747
Maynard, MA  01754		FAX:       508-493-1890
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps