HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rdale@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Robert Dale)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.internet,comp.org.eff.talk,rec.photo,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Illegal photographs and Prodigy
Date: 7 Apr 92 15:06:56 GMT
Followup-To: alt.bbs
Organization: Purdue University, W Lafayette IN

I guess the one good thing about all of this junk being posted to
alt.bbs.internet is that the number of "Please find me free access
in area code XXX" posts has diminished.

Several posts have been made asking the people posting replies to
keep alt.bbs.internet off of the distribution but this morning I wake
up to half-a-dozen posts on photos and a few access requests.
I guess now the point for action comes in.

RFD: All posts about photos, police and Prodigy's policies after
today (4/7) are replied to with a few megabytes of useless data, 
hopefully filling up the poster's mailboxes endlessly.
That should solve the problem.

My point is, TAKE ALT.BBS.INTERNET OUT OF YOUR FOLLOWUP POSTS IF
YOUR STUPID POST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INTERNET BBSs!!!!!

Rob
Xref: sparky alt.bbs:3421 comp.org.eff.talk:3415 misc.legal:9160
From: mingos@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.org.eff.talk,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Illegal photograph postings (was: Your police
Date: 10 Apr 92 12:41:54 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAXcluster

In article <1992Apr9.035253.18232@odin.corp.sgi.com>, donl@glass.esd.sgi.com (donl mathis) writes:
> This doesn't seem much like rec.photo material anymore, and yet it's
> *still* the noisiest topic in the group.  Would you folks please
> consider your cross-postings for appropriateness?
> 
> - donl mathis at Silicon Graphics Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA
> donl@sgi.com

  

 Agreed.  Now to make it very simple for you, I've deleted the rec.photo
address from THIS posting.  SO, all you have to do is post a followup TO 
this posting, and I think you'll make life a lot happier for LOTS of nice
photo people who're fed up of these flames.

   Goodbye, Farewell, Adieu. 
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: wally@netcom.com (Wally Schwarz)
Subject: Re: Multi-Line BBS's
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 01:10:18 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

From article <1992Apr5.233139.6962@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, by jtb5@po.CWRU.Edu (Justin T. Ballard):
> 
> I'm currently involved in a project to setup a multi-line BBS. We
> plan to use RBBS-PC as the host program. I have determined that 6
> lines is the most you can having running from one computer(only 6
> serial ports can be installed on a PC). I would like to hear from
> anybody who has also setup a BBS what they have done for multiple
> lines(up to 20).  All information is valuable! Thanks.

Look into Digiboards.  I have their PC/8 board which provides 8 serial ports
on a single board.  YOu can have up to 4 boards in one machine, and you can
configure the boards to use one or two irq's between all the ports. Works really
slick with TBBS.  I have been told that it will work with the fossil, but I
have never done that personally.
-- 
Wally Schwarz                               Wally World BBS
2228 S El Camino Real #40                   415/349-6969/Free Line - 2400bps
San Mateo, CA 94403                         415/349-8408/Contributor Line
                                            V.32 and V.32bis available
From: chris@atl.scscom.com (Chris Boaro)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 BBS wanted
Date: 15 Apr 92 19:12:47 GMT
Organization: SCS/Compute, Inc.

In <c70rb4.896@cat.de> denis@cat.de (Denis Schettl) writes:

>Hi .....
>Do someone know a BBS for running on OS/2 ? Or do your have a BBS-Source-Code
>for a GNU-C-Compiler ? Please send me an answere ......

>                                      Thanx
>                                        Denis

>---
>  Denis Schettl (denis@cat.de)                     
>  C.A.T. Kommunikations-System, Frankfurt, Germany

Yes, I have written an OS/2 BBS product called Omega Point/2 BBS. You can
call my board and download the 2 user shareare version at 1-404-564-1961.

Chris
From: darren@bigfoot.UUCP (Darren McDaniel)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: testing news...
Date: 9 Apr 92 02:16:48 GMT
Organization: Bigfoot's Den BBS

Testing to see if this works...

Please disregard...

-------
Bigfoot's Den BBS
Home of the MusicNet...
10pm to 6am
UUCP Address:lemuria.sai.com!bigfoot!darren
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.lists,alt.bbs.internet
From: mcmahan@cs.unca.edu (Scott McMahan -- Genesis mailing list owner)
Subject: Re: UNIX BBS WANTED
Organization: University of North Carolina at Asheville
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 19:16:07 GMT

unijbm@uts.uni-c.dk (J|rgen B. Madsen) writes:

: I have the following requirements:
: 
:     *  System 5 (BSD) UNIX

You might as well hang it up :) System 5 != BSD. Unless you
get a Sun, which has the best of both worlds -- S 5 and BSD.
They're mutually exclisive for the most part!

Scott

Xref: sparky alt.bbs:3398 comp.org.eff.talk:3398 misc.legal:9078
From: monson@caviar.ECE.ORST.EDU (Tyrus Monson)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.org.eff.talk,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Illegal photograph postings (was: Your police at work for
Date: 9 Apr 92 19:04:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: talon.1992Apr9.190441.4504
Organization: Oregon State University, Corvallis


 Delete rec.photo from the cross-posting list of this subject. PLEASE!
 This discussion has gotten way off the subject of photography, and most
 postings are entirely inappropriate to the rec.photo group. Extensive
 posting under this subject heading has left the rec.photo news group
 loaded with volumes of irrelevant postings. Please delete rec.photo
 from your cross-posting list unless your discussion truly deals with
 still photography. 
  Thank you.
From: goehring@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Scott Goehring)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: Illegal photographs and Prodigy
Date: 8 Apr 92 21:48:07 GMT
Article-I.D.: mentor.GOEHRING.92Apr8164807
	<1992Mar26.003639.13546@eff.org> <44216@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
	<1992Apr8.124854.3239@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
Reply-To: goehring@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
In-reply-to: mpevans@isis.cs.du.edu's message of 8 Apr 92 12:48:54 GMT

mpevans@isis.cs.du.edu (Mark Evans) writes:

>IMHO if a piece of text, or scanned image dosn't clearly declare
>itself to be copyright then it isn't.

False.  Copyright is implicit.  Everything you create is copyrighted.
However, in order to have a reasonable chance to PROTECT your
copyright, you need to declare the copyright within the guidelines of
Title 17 (US) or the Berne Convention (int'l).

>Thus if you find any items in a BBS claiming copyright, and not
>uploaded by the copyright owner, then they sould be removed.

No, if you find any items, whose presence on your BBS is not permitted
by the conditions expressed by the copyright holder, they should be
removed.

>Plaine scanned images, of whatever subject, lacking a copyright symbol
>should be regarded as non-copyright.

Doing this is a *BAD* idea.  Scanned images are just as much
copyrightable (and copyrighted) as anything else.
--
This is an incredibly selfish and self-centered position to take.  What if
women wore what they wanted to wear, instead of what made them "good looking"
or "sexy"?  The end of the human race.  Think about it.
		-- David Stevenson (stevenso@Apple.COM)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: mpevans@isis.cs.du.edu (Mark Evans)
Subject: Re: Illegal photographs and Prodigy
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 12:48:54 GMT

rdale@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Robert Dale) writes:

>My point is, TAKE ALT.BBS.INTERNET OUT OF YOUR FOLLOWUP POSTS IF
>YOUR STUPID POST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INTERNET BBSs!!!!!

Surely there is the issue of what do you do if you are a modorator of
a BBS connected to the internet about copyright material being uploaded.
As well as the fundermental question of what material, in the form
or scanned images and text on computer systems, hence BBSs could be
covered by copyright.
Also keeping in context that the internet is an INTERNATIONAL system,

IMHO if a piece of text, or scanned image dosn't clearly declare itself
to be copyright then it isn't.
Thus if you find any items in a BBS claiming copyright, and not uploaded
by the copyright owner, then they sould be removed.
Plaine scanned images, of whatever subject, lacking a copyright symbol
should be regarded as non-copyright.
From: 00mddwyer@bsu-ucs.uucp
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Corruped FTP files- HELP!!!!!
Date: 9 Apr 92 14:48:29 GMT
Article-I.D.: bsu-ucs.1992Apr9.094829.5939

Can someone please tell me what I am doing wrong?!?
I am using Kermit to download off FTP sites, and I have tried all the
combinations of setting the FTP to ascii and binary, and the kermit program
to both, but when ever I download the files from my VAX to my Macintosh, the
files are incomplete or corrupted.  I can usually get .bqx files ok, but most
files aren't in this or text format.  Is there a way to convert the files on
the FTP to .bqx files before they get to my VAX and get corrupted????
Could someone please post a COMPLETE list of steps to download from FTP's with
Kermit onto a VAX system, and then retreive them to a Macintosh, please?
Any help would be very much apreciated!
Mike Dwyer, Ball State, Muncie, Indiana.
From: bob@teamate.UUCP (bob)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: AIX BBS WANTED
Summary: Available RS6000 BBS SW
Keywords: AIX BBS HELP!
Date: 11 Apr 92 15:15:42 GMT
Distribution: usa

We sell a commercial product, TEAMate.  If you'd like to see a version of
it running on a RS6000 on INTERNET, telnet to supernet.ans.net
(147.225.1.51).  This system is run by Supercomputing Review Magazine,
who is one of our customers.

-- 
  MMB Development Corporation, 904 Manhattan Ave, Manhattan Beach, CA  90266
       "The TEAMate UNIX BBS for SUN, DEC, IBM, AT&T, HP and INTEL"
             VOICE: (800) 832-6022 or teamate@uunet.uu.net
From: mvdl@et.tudelft.nl
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: Multi-Line BBS's
Date: 8 Apr 92 18:16:42 GMT
Organization: TU-Delft, dpt of Electrical Engineering

In article <1992Apr8.120337.22945@news.rn.com>, larry@news.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
> jtb5@po.CWRU.Edu (Justin T. Ballard) writes:
> 
>>I'm currently involved in a project to setup a multi-line BBS. We
>>plan to use RBBS-PC as the host program. I have determined that 6
> 
> RBBS-PC is the pits as a multiline BBS - almost as bad as PC-Bored 
> 
> for DOS - and multiline -- TBBS is best -- nothing comes close
> 
> TBBS supports up to 64 serial ports on a 386 based machine --
> 
> The real answer is not to run DOS - but run UNIX.  TBBS while the
> best solution for DOS doesn't come close to the power and flexibility
> of UNIX.  
> 
> -- 
>  =*= Larry Snyder, Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-0777 - 10 lines =*=
>       internet: larry@gator.rn.com        uucp: uunet!trauma!larry

Well, if multi-line is all you care for, TBBS is allright, although I must say
i find the latest version (2.2) very instable. 
When you want to go the extra mile, TBBS turns out to be the worst solution.
I agree about it's amazing speed with 64 lines, and even a more than accaptable
speed when run on a XT-machine, but real 'dossing' is not possible, let alone
running doors. And TDBS isn't really all I ever dreamt of. The possibilities
for remote-sysops are terrible, there are no decent options, everything has to
be done in a very tricky way. To run a bbs-program that needs one copy per node
has it's advantages, and running it in a LAN with ethernet or novell-compatible
net(hard)ware is a very nice solution. Motherboards are not that expensive
these days, and you can expand graduately, Where TBBS is a vary expensive
program (and expensive computer AND expensive digi-board) all in one buy. 
And: if one node goes down, they all go down. Not so with the LAN-solution
(expept for a halted server ofcourse). Running OS/2 with maximus is also a very
nice solution (and I find OS/2 much much MUCH friendlier than UNIX  (nix sounds
like the dutch word for 'nothing'... How appropriate !)

WEll, we'll all keep our opinions about all systems and software available, but
TBBS most certainly also has his disadvantages. One of them is that it is NOT
PD or shareware. I don't like that one bit.... It's far too expensive.

Michel.

*Do you already sleep in a BBS Waterland T-shirt ?

(PS: I have to admit: I'm a co-sysop at a TBBS-running BBS.. Well... they need
all the experts they can get :-) )
From: ssanbeg@visual.spk.wa.us (Scott Sanbeg)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: OS/2 BBS Software?
Date: 10 Apr 92 00:37:14 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: The Visual Market Public Access Site - Spokane, WA

In article <1992Apr07.150924.8336@atl.scscom.com> chris@atl.scscom.com (Chris Boaro) writes:
>
>You can get my package, Omega Point/2 BBS, for OS/2. The 2 line shareware
>version can be downloaded from my BBS at 404-564-1961. Commercial versions
>supporting up to 48 lines, usenet news, and internet mail are available.

Well, I just have to ask... Chris, the last time I registered your software,
and it was then supposed to be with "usenet news and internet mail," there
were no such capabilities. What condition is the package in now?
Scott

 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Scott Sanbeg         Spokane, Washington     Voice: 509/535-2561
ssanbeg@visual.spk.wa.us (or) visual!ssanbeg@tau-ceti.isc-br.com
From: jpatters@willamette.edu (Jane Patterson)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: bbs/unix in Seattle area (206)
Date: 8 Apr 92 03:36:13 GMT
Article-I.D.: willamet.1992Apr8.033613.17359
Organization: Willamette University, Salem, OR

Could someone e-mail a bbs listing for the Seattle area? And also, any
information on Seattle Online Public Access Unix?
Thanks in advance!!

Jayn
From: karenm@yenta.alb.nm.us (Karen Millar)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Need bbs list for Sacramento area
Date: 6 Apr 92 21:27:37 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: yenta unix pc, rio rancho, nm

Please send me via email or post here a list of bbs's both 
adult and younger bbs's in the Sacramento area. 

Thanks, its appreciated...

Karen.
-- 
    Love is the answer...
	Communication Facilities Designer
	Freelance in the Land of Enchantment              Albuquerque, NM
	karenm@yenta.alb.nm.us                             (505) 266-8659
From: rice@ttd.teradyne.com
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: Multi-Line BBS's
Date: 12 Apr 92 04:10:46 GMT
Organization: Teradyne Inc., Telecommunications Division

In article <BMEG8s.6LM@world.std.com>, aboba@world.std.com (Bernard D Aboba) writes:
>  >TBBS does not come close to the flexibility of UNIX....
>  
> As a 5-year TBBS sysop, I agree with this. You might also have mentioned that
> UNIX is no more expensive, or even less so, than TBBS. After all, a full
> featured development version of UNIX VR4 runs no more than $2000 which
> would include VP/ix. And that system would be able to compile a huge
> wealth of publicly distributable code. It also is networkable, which is
                                         -----------------------------------
> my major problem with TBBS. 
 ---------------------------

   I run TBBS on a network, as do many other corporate users. While it can't
be directly integrated (a-la telnet), it can be connected to a 'server' as
a network service. I run 6 ports on a DEC network and 2 ports on in-watts.
   For those with other types of networks, the connection would be via the
same devices used for "modem pooling". Rather than connecting to modems, the
connection is to the TBBS port, via a null-modem cable.
   I have heard of TBBS machines being accessable on internet, but couldn't
tell you where or how.
 
-- 
   John Rice         K9IJ    |  "Did I say that ?" I must have, but It was
   rice@ttd.teradyne.com     |   MY opinion only, no one else's...Especially
   (708)-940-9000 - (work)   |   Not my Employer's....
   (708)-438-7011 - (home)   |   Purveyor of Miracles,Magic and Slight-of-hand
From: ssanbeg@visual.spk.wa.us (Scott Sanbeg)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: OS/2 BBS Software?
Date: 17 Apr 92 12:01:39 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: The Visual Market Public Access Site - Spokane, WA

In article <1992Apr15.192301.19752@atl.scscom.com> chris@atl.scscom.com (Chris Boaro) writes:
>asp@trail.sharpstone.com (Alexandre Sasha Polozoff) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Apr07.150924.8336@atl.scscom.com> (alt.bbs), chris@atl.scscom.com (Chris Boaro) writes:
>>> You can get my package, Omega Point/2 BBS, for OS/2. The 2 line shareware
>>> version can be downloaded from my BBS at 404-564-1961. Commercial versions
>>> supporting up to 48 lines, usenet news, and internet mail are available.
>>> 
>>> Log on, or e-mail me if you have any questions...
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> 
>
>>Is it compatible with version 2.0 of OS/2?
>

Chris - I asked you if you're still claiming that Omega Point/2 is
news/email capable while it is NOT. To other readers: I registered this
guy's software some months ago and was never provided his "promised"
capabilities.

I'm assuming there's a remote chance you've upgraded OP/2 to include
news and email, Chris. But then, if you have, why am I not notified??
Scott

 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Scott Sanbeg, UNIX Systems Administrator     Voice: 509/535-2561
ssanbeg@visual.spk.wa.us (or) visual!ssanbeg@tau-ceti.isc-br.com
Xref: sparky alt.bbs:3337 alt.bbs.internet:2213 comp.org.eff.talk:3343 rec.photo:6776 misc.legal:8929
From: yury@bknight.jpr.com (Yury German)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.internet,comp.org.eff.talk,rec.photo,misc.legal
Subject: Re:  Illegal photograph postings (was: Your police at work for you!)
Distribution: world
Date: 4 Apr 92 18:51:40 GMT
Organization: Blue-Knight Productions

In article <bobl.2xpt@bobsbox.rent.com> bobl@bobsbox.rent.com (Bob Lindabury, SysAdmin) writes:
>
>Any images I have in my library that seem to be copyrighted will be
>deleted.  All X and R rated GIFs have already been removed from my
>system.  How is that for you?  Satisfied?

	Just so all of you know and stop getting paranoid. Scanning and
using pictures is allowed as long as the picture is not duplicated
exactly. If the pictures is altered to certain degree then it becomes your
work. I do that all the time when I have to rotoscope something .
(Rotoscoping) is where you digitize a picture and draw over it to make it
look like painting. You comonly see this on TV as the comercials for
Basketball and footballs games. As well as some of the sports shows. This
is LEAGAL. 
	I can scan in a nude and recompose it into another picture or a
background or alter it a certain way and no problem at all....
	So stop getting paranoid about playboy and everyone suing you. Its
not this that they go after. I am sure taht the BBS charged a good sum for
the downloads and thats why they went after it. 
--

    _____________________________________________________________________
   |                                                                     |
   | Yury German                  yury@bknight or yury@bknight.jpr.com   |
   | Blue-Knight Productions      GENIE EMAIL: Blue-Knight               |
   | (212)218-1348                (Graphic Design and Video Productions) |
   | (718)321-0998		  P.O. Box 985, Queens, New York, 11354  |
   |_____________________________________________________________________|

Xref: sparky alt.bbs:3371 comp.org.eff.talk:3379 misc.legal:9014 rec.photo:6862
From: bobl@bobsbox.rent.com (Bob Lindabury, SysAdmin)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.org.eff.talk,misc.legal,rec.photo
Subject: Re: Illegal photograph postings (was: Your police
Date: 8 Apr 92 17:18:11 GMT
Organization: Raven Enterprises -- Piscataway, NJ USA
X-NewsSoftware: Amiga GRn V1.28 2/25/92 (Beta) by Mike Schwartz

In article <1992Apr7.220834.28568@gtephx.UUCP> forda@gtephx.UUCP (Andrew Ford @ AGCS, Phoenix, Arizona) writes:
>In article <bobl.2yy5@bobsbox.rent.com>, bobl@bobsbox.rent.com (Bob Lindabury, SysAdmin) writes:
>[...]
>>
>> There is a big problem here and I for one think it should be fixed.	We
>> also have to realize that in some of these groups, some of the images
>> *are* originals.  I would vote for the pictures groups to be moderated.
>> Yeah, try that one on for size.  60 megs of images every 2 weeks...and
>> then having to determine if the images were scans of copyrighted
>> materials.  Easier to just drop most of them I guess.  I'm all for the
>> distribution of original artwork but when it comes to useless
>> pornography scans out of magazines my blood pressure just builds.  Or
>> for that matter, images digitized from porno videotapes.  What kind of
>> childish sex-fiends do we have to support on this network?
>>
>My, my, what a shame!	All this time we thought the system was designed,
>built, purchased, installed, and maintined *just* for you!  Now we come
>to find that the system is available to everyone AND, worse yet, these
>people have a right to feel differently than you - how awful!! people
>actually enjoying things you find useless!
>
>I was going to suggest that you go find a different form of government to
>live under, but then I noticed you are already in the People's Repbulic
>of New Jersey.  Suddenly I understand why you hold such fascist attitudes.
>
>
>--
>It's a wonderful feeling when you voted for the winner, but the time to vote for
>the guy who "could win" is past: vote your conscience - Marrou/Lord in 92!
>Andrew Ford INTERNET: gtephx!forda@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
>	     UUCP: !uunet!samsung!romed!asuvax!gtephx!forda

Great.	Someone that has to resort to personal attacks to make his
point.	Rest assured I will be replying to this individual via private
mail and saving the rest of you from my anger at this uninformed
individual.

-- Bob

InterNet: bobl@bobsbox.rent.com 	       | Raven Enterprises
    UUCP: ...rutgers!bobsbox!bobl	       | 25 Raven Avenue
  BitNet: bobl%bobsbox.rent.com@pucc	       | Piscataway, NJ 08854
  Home #: 908/560-7353			       | 908/271-8878
From: slr2l@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: MAXIMUS 2.01 WANTED!!!
Date: 11 Apr 92 12:26:10 GMT
Article-I.D.: cc.1992Apr11.062611.54386
Organization: Utah State University

I'm desperately seeking Maximus V2.01.  Any ideas where I may acquire this?
Thanks...

  SLR2L@cc.usu.edu
Xref: sparky alt.bbs:3372 alt.bbs.internet:2241 comp.org.eff.talk:3380 rec.photo:6863 misc.legal:9015
From: max@underg.UUCP (Max Cray)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.internet,comp.org.eff.talk,rec.photo,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Illegal photograph postings (was: Your police at work for you!)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 92 11:44:26 EDT
Organization: Underground Computing Foundation

> You are themost noxious person I have had the ill fortune to come across, 
> here, sir.  What you are doing is whining repeatedly, over and over, and 
> are becoming less and less sypathetic.  It seems that you lack the 
> capability to apreciate others views.  Frankly, if you want to know the 
> truth, I personally don't think the copyright laws are of any use any 
> more.  Thay have been pushed into obsolescence by the economy.  Don't 
> whine to me about your "small guy", stuff.  I, too, am a small guy.  I 
> bet you have a nice home, family, etc, so stop bitching.  The quote you 
> so arrogantly retaliated againt, by the way, has nothing whatsoever to do 
> with this discussion, other than it states a view I have:  don't buy the 
> brain rot that people like you dish out.  You _reek_ of the corporate 
> mentality pal.  Go ahead, post software to the net.  I think you _should_ 
> be able to do it, smart ass.  And I think all the corp people like Bill 
> Gates, etc., could get as pissed off as they like, because it really 
> would have very little effect on me.  You sound like somebody with 
> something to lose.  You sound like some cowering little worm who sweats 
> petty copyright laws which are only there to fill pockets of a bunch of 
> greedy corporate scumbags.  You sound like you need an enema.

I too agree with your position, Rocker. Keep up the good work.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                            -= Max Cray =-
 Net:     underg%max@uunet.uu.net                         Support
 UUCP:    ...!uunet!underg!max                            Free
 Data:    The Underground Computing Foundation BBS        Software
          401-847-2603 -=- 9600 baud (v.32)               (w/src)
 CI$:     76334,2203