HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: johnl@iecc.cambridge.ma.us (John R. Levine)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Commercial Service Addresses
Date: 27 Sep 92 22:46:32 GMT
Organization: I.E.C.C.
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 742, Message 5 of 9

> Delphi?

Delphi users can telnet to DELPHI.COM and log in just like the dialed
direct to one of the local numbers in Cambridge or Kansas City.
There's no communication surcharge like there is for Telenet (excuse
me, Sprintnet) or Tymnet.  I found it very convenient over the summer
when I was down in New Jersey and had access to a Cisco box on the
Internet.

Delphi is a commercial service and you need an account.  The cheapest
accounts give you four hours/month for $10, or 20 hours for $20.  I
find it particularly useful for Travel-by-Modem, an excellent on-line
travel agent.  They now have Internet mail access too, which they
claim will cost extra but so far does not.


Regards,

John Levine, johnl@iecc.cambridge.ma.us, {spdcc|ima|world}!iecc!johnl
or, I suppose, jlevine@delphi.com
Date: Sun,  4 Oct 92 09:25:43 PDT
From: John_David_Galt%portal@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: LD Transmission Quality Comparison
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 759, Message 11 of 14

I have used MCI for everything, since before the breakup, and have
never had any problems with it.  I wouldn't be surprised if the people
with problems are calling to or from some rural location that only
AT&T has wired yet.
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 15:32:01 EDT
From: dwn@dwn.ccd.bnl.gov (Dave Niebuhr)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: What it Costs to Have the President Over
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 762, Message 13 of 16

In TELECOM Digest Volume 12 : Issue 760 Clark <MERRILL@stsci.edu>
writes:
  
> mattair@sun44.synercom.hounix.org (Charles Mattair) writes:

>> Totally off the subject of telecom but Barbara Bush decided to take a
>> walk in Hermann Park (the largest park in Houston proper) during the
>> Economic Summit a couple of years ago.  They cleared the park.

> What has happened is that the secret service has totally taken over
> the presidential security detail.  

The way I think that this happened is that the Treasury Department was
assigned the task of protecting the President after one was assassin-
ated (sp) and the Secret Service was the branch of that department
selected for the job.

This was in the late 1800s and the job has expanded to the point that
the the President, his immediate family, the Vice-President and his
family and any Presidential candidates get this protection via a law
or executive order signed by signed by the late President Lyndon
Johnson after the assassination of Senator Robert Kennnedy of New York
in 1968.


Dave Niebuhr      Internet: niebuhr@bnl.gov / Bitnet: niebuhr@bnl
Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973  (516)-282-3093


[Moderator's Note: Yeah, we know how it was set up, but I still think
there is a massive overkill.  PAT]
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 92 23:35:51 EDT
From: Tony Harminc <TONY@VM1.MCGILL.CA>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: ADA Requirements
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 759, Message 6 of 14

The AT&T Public Phone 2000s that I have seen all fail at the least the
height, reach, and handset cord length requirements of the ADA.  I am
fairly sure they did not have a TDD mode either.
 

Tony Harminc
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 92 10:13:00 -0700
From: henry@ads.com (Henry Mensch)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: 800 Numbers Blocked by NYTel?
Reply-To: henry@ads.com
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 739, Message 10 of 17

Douglas Scott Reuben <DREUBEN@EAGLE.WESLEYAN.EDU> wrote:

> Utter nonsense ... (BTW, are you SURE it was an AT&T recording, or NYTel?)

Absolutely ... unless some other company answers its phones "AT&T; may
I help you?". This was part of the surprise.

Finally, it MAY be that the payphone in question was due to be
disconnected, and left in service as a "public convenience" (read:
NYTel was lazy).

This was four public phones over several blocks; I'm pretty certain
this phenomenon was not limited to a particular phone.


henry mensch / booz, allen & hamilton, inc.  / <henry@ads.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 16:36:40 EDT
From: Bill Berbenich <bill@eedsp.gatech.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Info Needed About "Nationwide Long Distance" Company
Reply-To: bill@eedsp.gatech.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 747, Message 7 of 14

I am very satisfied with Cable & Wireless (10223) and have had them
for almost a year now.  Data connections are always good and voice
quality is on a par with the "big three."

Some caveats -- they don't take residential customers generally, but
can be persuaded to do so.  There is a $5/month fee for smaller
customers, but my savings offset that.  Call setup times are
noticeably longer than for the "big three," but no more than an
additional second or two at the very most.  They also offer a
"no-surcharge" calling card, but the per-minute rate is a bit higher
than for the companies that do levy a surcharge.

Call Cable & Wireless and inquire.  They'll be happy to send you an
informational packet in the mail.  I've been very happy with having
switched.


Bill Berbenich, School of EE, DSP Lab    Georgia Tech, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp: ...!{backbones}!gatech!eedsp!bill  Internet: bill@eedsp.gatech.edu
Date: 28 Sep 92 18:54:08 GMT
From: lairdb@crash.cts.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: 800 Numbers Restricted by NYTel?
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 747, Message 11 of 14

In <telecom12.733.6@eecs.nwu.edu> jbutz@homxa.att.com writes:

> Blocking 800 is sometimes done for fraud prevention.  One example is
> street drug dealers.  They often use payphones as their "office
> phones."  Clients usually contact their dealers through a pager, and
> paging companies often use 800 numbers.  This may not be a big issue
> any longer, since most pagers display the caller info.  Payphones in
> high crime areas often have both calling card blocked, and 800
> blocked, about the only thing callers can do is to drop in coins or
> call collect.

Wandering a little from the subject, but I'm confused by this.  Who
exactly is being "defrauded"?  The 800 carrier gets paid by the paging
company, which is happy to do so because they are paid by the paging
customer for the service they provide.

I'm missing something here ...


Laird P. Broadfield     lairdb@crash.cts.com    ...{ucsd, nosc}!crash!lairdb
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 00:08:45 GMT
From: stevef@wrq.com (Steve Forrette)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Stop the Presses, Call the Police!
Organization: Walker Richer & Quinn, Inc., Seattle, WA
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 733, Message 8 of 13

In article <telecom12.730.9@eecs.nwu.edu> cmoore@BRL.MIL (VLD/VMB)
writes:

> To summarize: 650611 in the Netherlands (at Amsterdam?) got a lot of
> calls, and on many of them only the last 4 digits got through, causing
> many calls to reach police at the 0611 emergency number.

> What kind of exchange is it that strips some leading digits off and
> processes the remaining digits, within what is apparently only the
> local phone number?

This was probably caused by people who pick up the phone and start
dialing, without waiting first for dialtone.  If the switch is heavily
loaded and delays giving you dialtone for one or two seconds, it is
easy to see how the first few digits could be lost.  Many people I
know don't check for dialtone before dialing -- they just pick up the
handset, dial, then place the receiver to their ears.

Do you remember when the Yellow Pages had all sorts of helpful
messages scattered about in the unused areas of the page, such as
"Always listen for the dialtone before dialing" and "Call before you
dig?"  All the books I've seen in the past few years have gotten rid
of those, in favor of messages that tell you how wonderful it is to
buy advertising in the Yellow Pages.


Steve Forrette, stevef@wrq.com

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: ramzi@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (Ramzi Al-Majid)
Subject: ZYXEL TECH SUPPORT
Keywords: n
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 15:11:26 GMT

how good is it? i sent them mail a few days ago but have not recieved any
response back. my questions were pre-sale that will help us decide which
modems to buy for our systems and how many. 

thanks

-- 
Computer Science Department	arpanet : ramzi@cs.colorado.edu
Univ. of Colorado - Boulder	bitnet  : ramzi@boulder.bitnet
Campus Box # 430		csnet   : ramzi@boulder.csnet
Boulder, Co 80309-430		uucp    : {ncar|nbires}!boulder!ramzi
From: jerry@incc.com (Jerry Rocteur)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: USR
Keywords: USR sell mail-order
Date: 1 Oct 92 19:52:48 GMT
Organization: InCC.com Perwez Belgium

Hi,

Can anyone recommend a mail order shop that sells USR modems and that:

- Take Amex or VISA                
- Sell (ship) to Europe
- Will ship a 220v psu

I tried this a while ago with WB and *no_one* will do those simple
things with WB so maybe someone will with USR.

	
-- 
 __^__                                                              __^__
( ___ )------------------------------------------------------------( ___ )
 | / | Jerry Rocteur                       Email: jerry@InCC.COM    | \ |
 |___|  Independent Computer Consultants division DELDRA s.p.r.l.   |___|
(_____)------------------------------------------------------------(_____)
   ^                                                                  ^
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Re: 14400bps throuhput
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 92 11:50:08 GMT


In article <3862@randvax.rand.org> edhall@rand.org (Ed Hall)
writes:

>In article <00961830.76217780@vms.csd.mu.edu>
1012breuckma@vms.csd.mu.edu writes:

>>With a V.32bis connection I can download ZIP files using
>>Ymodem-G protocol and reach about 1650 cps.  The base rate
>>is 1440 so obviously the compression is working.

>No, the "base rate" is somewhere around 1750
>characters/second.  The reason for this is that V.42 and MNP4
>strip start and stop bits off of the serial data stream
>before transmission.  Thus 14400 bits/second means 14400/8 =
>1800 characters/second.  The protocol overhead of V.42 or
>MNP4 reduces this somewhat, down to 1750 or so.

>ZIP files are essentially uncompressible under V.42bis, and
>actually expand somewhat under MNP5.  The same is true with
>files from other archivers and with compression utilities
>like "compress." So you'll see essentially the same data
>rate with V.42bis as without it.

This put me in mind of a test I'd never run before.  The
modems are MultiTech 1432EAB (v32bis,v42bis).  The test file
is highly contrived to be compressible, 20000 lines of 49
zeroes plus LF, for a 1MB total.  Compressed with
'compress', it's only 13662 bytes.  The lowly kermit did the
transferring.

The 1mb file transferred in 28 seconds = 35714 cps.
Compressed first, it crossed in 11 seconds = 1242 cps.

When you're paying by the second (I'm not, thank goodness, I
leave the connection up for days) cps may not be the only
index of impressiveness. :-)

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
From: ss85+@andrew.cmu.edu (Srdan Simunovic)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Q: laptop+modem+cellular phone
Date: 30 Sep 92 09:04:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.MemRssK00iQ5A2FllF
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Hi,

Does someone have any experience with connection
made by using laptop+modem+cellular phone?
What baud rate is to be used in such connection?
Are there any other alternatives that can be explored?
What are the preferred components in such link?
Any suggestions and pointers will be highly appreciated.

Regards,

Srdan Simunovic
From: Petty@ralvm29.VNET.IBM.COM (Jack Petty)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 08:24:37 EDT
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: FAQ -- define v.32, v.42, etc.
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0
            <1992Oct3.170430.6528@telebit.com>

In <1992Oct3.170430.6528@telebit.com> Scott Bair writes:
>
>Not true. V.42bis doesn't require error correction. It is a separate module.
>
>Scott Bair
>Systems Engineer
>Telebit Corporation
>bair@telebit.com
>
Scott,
You can't meant that the way I read it.  V.42 bis is adaptive which
means both ends have a continuously changing translation table.  If
a single bit error in the link is not corrected before the data hits
the table, all following data is translated incorrectly.
Certainly V.42 bis can be a separate module of code, but it would be
a giant risk to run V.42 bis or MNP 5 over a link that did not correct
data errors.
Jack Petty
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:14171 comp.sys.sun.admin:6772
From: dclunie@sirius.ucs.adelaide.edu.au (David Clunie)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.sun.admin
Subject: Re: Telebit T3000 and Suns
Keywords: T3000, Sun
Date: 29 Sep 92 09:32:45 GMT
Organization: Her Master's Voice
NNTP-Posting-Host: sirius.itd.adelaide.edu.au

In article <3836@randvax.rand.org> edhall@rand.org (Ed Hall) writes:
>In article <1992Sep27.170419.1610@kilowatt.uucp> root@kilowatt.UUCP (Kilowatt admin) writes:
>>	My friend has a WorldBlazer (used to be a T3000) running at 38400.
>>His drops characters like crazy! It's more like big chunks of data that 
>>disappear.
>
>Then he doesn't have hardware flow control working correctly.  Trying
>to run a high-speed modem any other way is close to insanity (or at
>least will push you close to it :-).
>

That is quite correct. Unfortunately, sun sparcstations CANNOT DO
INCOMING HARDWARE FLOW CONTROL. The Zilog SCC implements only
outgoing hardware flow control on-board, and the sun serial driver
software does not throttle the line manually when its buffers start
to fill either.

This question comes up time and time again in comp.sys.sun.* and
I never yet seen a satisfactory solution other than buy another
SBUS card to do serial IO.

Unbelievable isn't it ? Why do I keep buying more Sun's ?

david

(PS. The problem is not quite so obvious if you turn the compression
of and avoid sudden bursts of decompressed data)
-- 
David Clunie (dclunie@itd.adelaide.edu.au)
From: botelle@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Justin Botelle)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Supras in BBS type operation
Date: 26 Sep 92 14:04:36 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Sep11.013715.23858@engr.uark.edu) hbj@engr.uark.edu (Bernard Johnson) writes:
)robert@cc.utah.edu (Robert Roll) writes:
)
))	Has anyone out there had any experience with Supras on a BBS or
))a large dial in operation. We are considering installing around 25 to 30 of
))them for our University Campus dial in service. They seem to be fairly
))resonably priced and we have done a trial run with 6 of them on the front
))end of our dial in rotary. One of the bugs we experienced may have been
))addressed with the new roms Supra just recently announced. This was the
))bug with them locking up. The CD state would just display continuously
))on the led display and they would then not answer the phone. The only
))way to clear this was to power cycle the modem. Another problem we 
))encountered was with them displaying garbage after some number of connections.
))This condition seemed to be cleared either by power cycling the modem or
))simply talking to it on its serial side without first making an incoming
))connection When I asked Surpa about this they said no one else had 
))experienced this. Also, every since I turned echo off with an ate0 I haven't
))seen the problem reoccur. Note I haven't asked about fax. For our use
))it is just not that important.
))	
)
)I wouldn't buy another until they could show positively that they have a fix
)for the problem.  I've had my modem since March and been promised a fix since
)about a week later when I discovered the problem.  I've already installed the
)first ROM upgrade that was *supposed* to fix the problem.  It didn't, so I have
)to reset my modem several timers per week (sometimes several times per day).
)IMHO, if you have to depend on it (dial in lines), don't buy from Supra until
)AFTER the fix is verified!

I have two Supra 14,400s.  Just purchased them.  Haven't had any problems.
Have used host mode OK, as well.  Fax works too (not a big priority, tho)
)
)Bernard Johnson
)hbj@engr.uark.edu

Justin
From: jra@lawday.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (John R. Ackermann x2966)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Upgrading Zyxel ROM Sockets
Date: 6 Oct 92 12:53:45 GMT
Reply-To: jra@lawday.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (John R. Ackermann x2966)
Organization: NCR Corporation, Law Department, Dayton OH

I just got my Rev 5.02 ROMS to upgrade from 4.04, and discovered that my
Zyxel 1496 is one of the old ones with 28 pin sockets.

I believe I saw something here before about upgrading the sockets, but
before I heat up my soldering iron I want to be sure...

Is it only necessary to add the single pin to each socket that appears
at the top right (that would be pin 30, I think)?  And that the other
three pins on the chip are left hanging in the air?

If I send the modem back to Zyxel for the upgrade, will they do anything
more than add the single pin to each socket?

Thanks...
John

-- 
John R. Ackermann, Jr.        Law Department, NCR Corporation, Dayton, Ohio
(513) 445-2966		      John.Ackermann@daytonoh.ncr.com
Packet Radio: ag9v@n8acv      tcp/ip: ag9v@ag9v.ampr [44.70.12.34]
From: jong@wright.seas.ucla.edu (Jong Y. Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: USR DS v.32bis 10-15% faster thoughput over the Worldblazer
Date: 2 Oct 92 23:54:57 GMT
Organization: SEASnet, University of California, Los Angeles

In article <BvF8rI.KH7@jwt.UUCP> john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples) writes:
>
>I get around 1650 cps when ZMODEM downloading compressed files with my
>WorldBlazer at V.32bis.  You're saying you get 1800-1900 cps?  I find
>that VERY hard to believe.  I can't say I recall anyone with any kind
>of V.32bis modem claiming to get over 1700 cps.
>-- 
>John W. Temples -- Preferred:  john@jwt.UUCP    (jwt!john@peora.sdc.ccur.com)
>                -- Alternate:  john@jwt.oau.org


I do get more than 1700cps very often with my SupraFaxModem.
I was using ymodem-g protocol though.
If you have a V.42bis modem, you really don't need to use Zmodem
and waste 50cps or so for double checking errors unless you happened to
lack 16550AFN uart and your serial port drops characters from time to time..  

Jongyoon
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: johnston@me.udel.edu (Bill Johnston)
Subject: Re: Supra New ROM (ordering info)
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 15:31:29 GMT

In article <Bv9zv7.Bq0@news.udel.edu> johnston@me.udel.edu (Bill Johnston) writes:
>Maybe this will save somebody a few minutes of long-distance 
>connect time.  First time Supra BBS users should try to log in
>using their full name as written on their warranty registration;
>this saves data entry time when ordering.

The BBS number is 513-967-2444 ... it's in the manual, folks.
-- 
-- Bill Johnston (johnston@me.udel.edu)
-- 38 Chambers Street; Newark, DE 19711; (302)368-1949
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion)
Subject: Re: USR Shipping Mix-Up (was: Re: "Problem dealing with USR")
Organization: W. J. Vermillion - Winter Park, FL
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 05:04:20 GMT

In article <j27nv9-.scottb@netcom.com> scottb@netcom.com (L'etat des mortes) writes:


>It seems I'm in the same boat.  I came into work today only to find a note
>from the Fed-X person saying that I needed a Cashiers Check, or Money
>order for my upgrade.  

>The person I talked to at USR today confirmed that 'several orders that
>where pre-paid shipped out last week incorrectly keyd for COD' (My own
>upgrade order included).  I was told that the problem would be fixed in a
>few days, and she assured me that I would get my modem within that time.   

'Fixed in a few days!' What utter crap.  It could have been fixed in a
couple of hours!

I had a similar instance where pre-paid items were shipped COD because
of a shipping department goof.  My first call was to Fed-Ex who said in
essesence "get the vendor to fax a release and we will deliver".
Called vendor.   About 1 hour later FedEx called and said we would get
the shipment first thing in the morning.   

You don't pay Fed Ex premium prices to have things 'fixed in a few
days!'

>I was given little solice more about the mistake other than "we'll fix the
>problem and get you the modem in a few days"  This after a 30 minute stint
>on thier 800 phone line. I was upset, but wasn't about to take it out on
>the person on the phone.  I'm a public servant so I understand to some
>degree.  However, I'm probably going to think twice about dealing with USR
>on future occasions.

A thirth minute wait on a 'free line' costs you time - and time is
money.

If I get stuck in a queue like that, I call on a toll line, explain the
problem, and make sure they call me back.   Business is business, and
if a vendor is responsive, they'll do that.  If not - find another
vendor.


-- 
Bill Vermillion - bill@bilver.oau.org  bill.vermillion@oau.org
                - bill@bilver.uucp 
                - ..!{peora|ge-dab|tous|tarpit}!bilver!bill

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: pdh@netcom.com (Phil Howard )
Subject: flow control on serial connection
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 00:13:50 GMT

What methods to the variable speed modems really use for controlling
the excess flow on the serial connection?  I frequently hear about
horror stories where some such modem is using ^S and ^Q for flow
control.

I want to make sure I buy a modem that uses CTS or appropriate RS-232
lines for the control, and full 256 code transparency to the other end.

Any models to avoid?
Any models that you know for sure are fully transparent?

BTW, where is the FAQ hiding (or is there one)?
-- 
/***********************************************************************\
| Phil Howard  ---  KA9WGN  ---  pdh@netcom.com   |   "The problem with |
| depending on government is that you cannot depend on it" - Tony Brown |
\***********************************************************************/
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: csjohn@knuth.mtsu.edu (The Mad Hatter)
Subject: ZyXEL EPROM or EEPROM?
Summary: ZyXEL EPROM or EEPROM?
Organization: Dept. of CS, Middle TN State Univ, Murfreesboro, TN
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 21:10:32 GMT

Hi,

I've got a ZyXEL U1496E with the version 4.13 ROM chips.
I would like to upgrade to ROM version 5.01, and have
downloaded the new ROM code from ZyXEL.  A friend of mine
has a chip programmer, but I am unsure which chip to
buy.  I know I need a 120ns 1MB chip, but is it an
EPROM or an EEPROM that I need??  What is the difference
between the two?  Where is a good source to buy what I need?
Thanks.

-- 
John Wallace   ||   INTERNET: csjohn@knuth.mtsu.edu
  > > > Vote for freedom.  Vote Libertarian. < < <
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit