HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rod@cats.ucsc.edu (Rodrick Su)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Miller's Crossing
Date: 7 Apr 92 16:46:23 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Tigana Restoration Inc.


	It is suprising to me that there weren't any protest of any
	kind regarding Miller's Crossing by Gay activiists.  Basic
	Instinct gets royal treatment by these groups for its negative
	portrial of lesbians.  By the same token, all of the gay characters
	in MC are rather negative.  There are three such characters:

	Bernie: here is a guy who really bite off the hand that feeds him.
		Any sign of mercy to Bernie is a sign of weakness that he
		can exploite.

	Miggs: he was not shown in great details. He uses his relationship
		with Danes to profit himself.  His alliance with Bernie 
		ultimately caused his death. Come to think of it, he started
		the war by killing off Leo's tail on Bernie's sister.

	Danes: Unlike the other two hustlers, Danes actually have some 
		redeeming value.  He is a ruthless killer for Casper, and
		his love blinds him of the actual events that took place
		around him.  His refusal to believe that Miggs will use
		him is a prime example.

	At the end of the movie, I feel sympathy for two characters only,
	Tom and Johnny.  Tom for losing his humanility and John for being
	the only principle character in the whole film.  Johnny's insistance
	on following his principle is the core of his downfall.

 
-- 
[ Rodrick Su           ]<----------------------------------------------------] 
[--------------------->[ `Belief is a concept that Ring does not believe in.']
[ rod@cats.ucsc.edu    ]----------------------->[ ``Emerald Eyes''           ] 
[ rod@ucscb.ucsc.edu   ]----------------------->[   Danield Keys Moran       ]
From: muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au (Murray Chapman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Scenes in ads, but not in film (was Re: Wayne's World Question)
Date: 9 Apr 92 06:08:15 GMT
Reply-To: muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au

Hi there

The promos for "City Slickers" showed someone with their spurs stuck to
a railing, and this was not in the Australian release version.


+^o^+^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-+-o-+
|   | Murray Chapman                          muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au       |   |
| o |                                                                  | o |
|   | University of Queensland      "I'd rather have a bottle in front |   |
| o | St Lucia, Queensland           of me than a frontal lobotomy"    | o |
|   | AUSTRALIA                               - Murray Chapman         |   |
| o |                                                                  | o |
+^-^+^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-------------+---+
                                                          \__          | o |
                                        Hate that! ----->    +^-^-^-^-^-^-^-
From: wdechent@usenet.umr.edu (William L. Dechent)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Inept use of the network
Date: 11 Apr 92 00:20:20 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri -- Rolla

Regarding the transmissions about netters not properly starting new threads-

I changed the subject (or tried to) and deleted all the references as recomm-
ended by a recent post.  I hope this is enough to prevent problems as de-
scribed in earlier posts.

Question:  I see all these posts where a person takes a prior post, and then
responds by reproducing the prior post, and also inserting comments.  How is
that done?  I've also seen people take my letters, and reply doing the same
thing (with the > marks to show what I wrote.)  Could someone describe how
this is done for all of us who don't know?  Thanks!

guilty of ignorance, but not malice,
Larry

wdechent@clciris.chem.umr.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: ecl@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Evelyn C. Leeper)
Subject: Re: THUNDERHEART
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 12:45:15 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.100031.5402@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> leeper@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Mark R. Leeper) writes:
> > >This in a place where it would be uncommon normally for a deer to be.
> > Why would it be uncommon for a deer to be here?
> This conversation is starting to get into real trivia.  My impression
> is that deer tend to stick to wild areas and stay away from settled
> areas.  Particularly because that was not a highly-settled area, it
> would probably be unusual to see a deer that close to buildings.

I suppose that's why we (this Mark Leeper character and I) almost hit
one which was running across the exit drive from AT&T one night, and
have seen others nearby.  Does this mean that AT&T's new secret project
is shape-changing?  :-)

Evelyn C. Leeper  |  +1 908 957 2070  |  att!mtgzy!ecl or  ecl@mtgzy.att.com
--
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny ..."
					 -- Isaac Asimov (1920-1992)
From: tkelsey@panix.com (Tom Kelsey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Palance's Acceptance Speech
Date: 11 Apr 92 15:25:12 GMT
Organization: PANIX - Public Access Unix Systems of NY

In article <1992Apr2.121550.12358@cs.joensuu.fi> jpehko@cs.joensuu.fi (Juha Pehkonen) writes:
>levin@star-trek.bbn.com (Joel B Levin) writes:
>>Well, as Arnie might say, he'll be back.  According to tradition that
>>Whoopi pointed out, the winner of best supporting actor comes back to
>>present the best supporting actress award the following year.
>
>that is if he lives to do it! :-) yeah i know, bad joke
>
>Juice

NO only the BEST Actor, Actress. return, NOT the supporting actors

t
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter)
Subject: Re: Who's Spider-Man? and Highlander wanted
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 20:44:21 GMT

donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald) writes:

>sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter) writes:

>><RHK106@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>>>Everyone probably knows about the Spider-Man movie that James Cameron is
>>>gonna do but if anyone can find a better actor to play Spider-Man than Keanu
>>>Reeves, you gotta tell me.  He's got the right build, the right Peter Parker
>>>looks and the only minus is the funny way he talks but I'm sure most people
>>>overlook that, Schwarzzenegger talks kinda funny too.

>>I still think that Ray Liotta would make a terrific Peter Parker, but
>>Keanu Reeves would have to be a close second.

>	Ok, so Ray Liotta is a great actor (See GoodFellas)... But he's about 
>35 years old.  Peter Parker is at best, 23 to 25.  I think Keanu is the best 
>suggestion I have heard so far.

Ray may be old, but how old is Michael Biehn?  In his 30s at least, I'd
guess.

                                       --Steve Stelter
                                           sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Please help identify a quote
Keywords: Jane, Bill Murray *NOT*
Date: 8 Apr 92 06:47:18 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <15865@bunny.GTE.COM>, jp07@gte.com (James Paschetto) writes:
> To the best of my recollection, Senator, the line in question was spoken
> by Dan Akroyd, not Mr. Murray.

YOU ARE CORRECT, SIR!!

GMS
From: synth@deepthought.unm.edu (Synth F. Oberheim)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Revenge of the Jedi
Date: 16 Apr 92 20:41:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: lynx.=a1j8t=
Organization: SynthMuzik Productions Ltd.:  The Danes Call It Quality

In article <17119@fritz.filenet.com> ung (Bill Ung) writes:

>As many of you know, the movies "Return of the Jedi" and "Star Trek II:The
>Wrath of Khan" were originally titled "Revenge of the Jedi" and "Star Trek
>II: The Revenge of Khan".
         ^^^^^^^
Incorrect.  STAR TREK II was originally subtitled "The *Vengeance* of Khan".


===============================================================================
    :: :: :: :: ::     Synth           synth@dreamtime.unm.edu   All Bound For
 :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  (F. Oberheim)   synth@yenta.alb.nm.us      Mu-Mu Land!
===============================================================================
Cowboy, the slow-thinking weapons expert, is ... DynaYellow!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: nyberg@ms.uky.edu (Jack Nyberg)
Subject: In Defense of TAXI DRIVER
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:46:08 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
X-Bytes: 

   TAXI DRIVER is an excellent movie and can stand on its own merit
without my feeble attempt at defending it.  But here are some things
to consider:

1. TAXI DRIVER is a Martin Scorsese film.  Mr. Scorsese tends to make 
   very ADULT films.  This is not to say that his movies are deeply
   profound, but they do have an inherent complexity that shows through
   in the plot and characters.  To dismiss TAXI DRIVER or any other
   movie because it is "boring and does not have enough action(?) scenes
   in it" , one must have a very limited definition of what a "good" 
   movie is.            







<spoilers>






















2. In my opinion, the best part of TAXI DRIVER is the letter at the end.
   Mr. Scorsese's use of a voice-over to read the letter to the audience
   was brilliant.  The reader's humble voice and the simple sincerity of
   the letter perfectly contrasts the madness of the events that preceded
   this scene.



Admittedly, TAXI DRIVER is not a movie that one would show to a gathering
of friends and family, and I don't think it was meant to be.  TAXI DRIVER
is a in-your-face paean to the irony of isolation in Urban America.


                                                Jack

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: aku@leland.Stanford.EDU (Andrew Chia-Tso Ku)
Subject: Re: Avalon: Awards/Nominations?
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 20:54:07 GMT

jameskau@aludra.usc.edu (James Kaufman) writes:
>spencer@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (S. Spencer Sun) writes:
>>What, if any, Academy Awards did _Avalon_ win and/or get nominated for?
>>
>>I vaguely recall Armin Mueller-Stahl getting something but it might just
>>have been a nomination.
>>----------

>I'm pretty sure that all it got was a Best Original Screenplay nomination,
>which it didn't win.  I'm 99% sure that Mueller-Stahl wasn't up...
>I haven't seen AVALON yet.  Is it good?

It received a best original score nomination (Randy Newman) and I *think*,
cinematography (Allen Daviau).  

Andrew
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: sdt8s@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Stephen Daniel Tilson)
Subject: Do not see PAST MIDNIGHT
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 03:01:13 GMT

The header says it all. No spoilers here, just a word to the
wise: DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE, especially if you are a fan of
Rutger Hauer--seeing him in this piece of vermin-ridden,
feces-encrusted, incompetently-produced garbage will just break
you heart. Is he that desperate for work?

The last time I saw a movie this bad was about a year and a
half ago when I slapped down three bucks to see _Death Warrant_
with Van Dumme. I put Past Midnight just above death warrant
and just below Steven Seagal's last movie. 

Honestly. This thing made _Deceived_ look good.

If you want more specific info on why I didn't like PM, please
email me and I'll try to respond w/in a couple of days. Right
now I just don't want to think about it anymore.

Steve
--
You will survive...surviving by exposing yourself to the hazards...taking 
the risk successfully until no enemies are left: and then you will become
your own enemy, that the proud battle may go on: all others conquered,
there will remain only yourself to be conquered...(Carlos Fuentes)
From: dsc@gemini.tmc.edu (Doug S. Caprette Bldg. 28 W191 x3892)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Best Film Swordfights
Date: 6 Apr 92 20:03:12 GMT
Organization: NASA GSFC CDP VLBI

In article <1992Mar31.183131.6877@linus.mitre.org> sdo@hoops.mitre.org (Sean D. O'Neil) writes:
>In article <1992Mar29.195656.29458@cs.yale.edu> loosemore-sandra@CS.YALE.EDU (Sandra Loosemore) writes:
>>gl1e+@andrew.cmu.edu (Greg G Levrault) writes:
>>
>>   Anyone who enjoyed the "Princess Bride" scene will love a scene in "The
>>   Court Jester"
>>
>>Well, this film made my "best swordfight" list too.  But the part that
>>had *me* rolling on the floor was the jousting tournament: "The pellet
>>with the poison is in the flagon with the dragon..."
>
>Wasn't it, "The vessel with the pestle has the poison in the pellet,
>the flagon with the dragon has the brew that is true"?
>
>Sean
"The chalice from the palace has the potion which is poison (but?) the flagon 
with the dragon has the brew which is true."

And I didn't even see the movie!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: T. Mallick....whatever happened to him?
Reply-To: reiher@onyx.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Peter Reiher)
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 17:08:46 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.033118.2159@ucc.su.OZ.AU> joe@archsci.arch.su.oz.au (Joe Nappa) writes:
>Whatever happened to Terrence Mallick? What other films did he
>direct besides "Badlands" and "Days of Heaven"? A great director..
>....don't tell me he's no longer with us!

Mallick hasn't made a film since "Days of Heaven", but he is still with
us.  (At least, if you mean, is he still alive?)  Weekly Variety runs 
a regular short column called something like "Missing Persons", about
people who once were very big deals but who have dropped out of sight.
Mallick was the subject of one of them, not too long ago.  I don't
remember all the details, but the impression I got was he was tired of
working in Hollywood's atmosphere, and, given the sort of films he made,
no one from Hollywood was exactly beating down his door to get him to
return.  I'll poke around to see if I still have the Variety that discussed
him, and post further details if I do.

			Peter Reiher
			reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov
			. . . cit-vax!elroy!jato!jade!reiher
From: uslave@mcl.mcl.ucsb.edu (KJS @ucsb.mcl)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jennifer Connelly
Keywords: Jennifer Connelly, Walt Disney, warlord-able sigs
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:03:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: mcl.uslave.702680635

In <2091@nlsun1.oracle.nl> dhanna@nl.oracle.com (Damien Hanna) writes:

>Jennifer Conelly DOES appear nude in the "Hot Spot". The video I saw shows a 
>flashback scene where she is shown naked on the shore of a lake with her 
>lesbian lover. We see what the guy who is spying on her (and later blackmailing
>her to sleep with him) sees. I thought is was a good movie. She's a seriously
>good looking woman.

He blackmails her for money...Virginia Madsen is the one that does all of the
"sleeping" in the movie...;-)
I thought the movie was okay, but she sure made it a whole lot better!   ;-)

>BTW, does she appear in "Once upon a time in America" as a young girl (12 years
>old or so) ?

Yup.  She plays a young Elizabeth McGovern (I forget the name of the character
they played...).


--
*        *      *     *     *    *   *  *  * * ** ** *** **** ****** ********* 
   KJS @ucsb.mcl (Jesse Chang)               e-mail: uslave@mcl.mcl.ucsb.edu *
   "Traveling thru hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, boy!"    -- Han Solo * 
*         *       *      *     *    *   *  *  * ** ** *** **** ****** ********
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: spencer@burst.Princeton.EDU (S. Spencer Sun)
Subject: how to start a new thread
Originator: news@ernie.Princeton.EDU
Organization: Princeton Univ. Class of '94
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 06:47:06 GMT

I'm not sure if my last post made it out due to news server problems but
just in case, here's a short summary on how to start a new thread using
rn or trn and presumably other *rn derivatives if they exist.

At the "Article xxx of yyy" prompt, type a dollar sign $ which will take
you to the end-of-the-newsgroup prompt which looks something like

End of unread articles [qnp]?

Or something similar indicating there aren't any unread articles.  At
this point type an 'f' character and it should prompt you for a subject
so you'll know you're starting a new subject.

if you forget and leave a newsgroup and get to

123 unread articles in the.next.group -- read them now? [ynq]

(with a + if you're using trn) you can hit '-' to get to the group you
just left, or you can type 'g rec.arts.movies' to get to rec.arts.movies
in which case it'll say something like

0 unread articles in rec.arts.movies -- read them now? [ynq]

and you say 'y' and it'll say "end of articles" and you proceed as
above.
----------
S. Spencer Sun - Princeton Univ. Class of '94 - Dept. of Computer Science
Clockwork Orange - Princeton Ultimate (when I show up for practice)
"I'm nice... He's nice... and we're both f---ing lunatics.  Can I
come in please?"
From: roby@brahms.udel.edu (Scott W Roby)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Koyaanis-/Powaqqatsi Book?
Date: 11 Apr 92 01:33:35 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

>Is there a book, major article, etc. on Godfrey Reggio and the making of
>"Koyaanisqatsi" and/or "Powaqqatsi"?
>
>Nichael

Sorry I can't help on your legitimate request.

Just wanted to say I had a good laugh when I misinterpreted 
the title of your posting.  I was thinking that someone was 
looking for a novelization of the film.  Now *that* would 
require a very talented author!!    :-)     :-)

-- 
Scott W. Roby           *This sentence no verb.*      "No Matter where you go..
Phys.& Astr.Dept.    ///// / /  /  *|*  \  \ \ \\\\\      there you are!"
Univ.of Delaware    ((((( ( (  (  * + *  )  ) ) )))))   -> Buckaroo Banzai
roby@brahms.udel.edu \\\\\ \ \  \  *|*  /  / / /////  -> Mad Max b/y Thunderdome
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: New Predator II Question
Date: 16 Apr 92 15:21:17 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

> A good hunter does not want to depleat the source from which his prey comes.
> By killing the pregnant police officer, the Preditor would litterally waste
> future prey.  It also leaves material for the next sequel....

I had heard somewhere (Uh-oh! Another unsubstantiated rumor!) that in the
original script there had been a romance planned between the female cop and 
Bill Paxton's cop. (Ya know, opposites attract?)  But it had been cut out, 
and her being pregnant was the only part left in.  (Or does she get weepy 
when he gets iced?  That could be another clue)  Reactions?

Greg Bole	                                   "Finger lickin' good!"
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu                      Bill Paxton in _Near Dark_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: andre@rurutu.wri.com (Andre Kuzniarek)
Subject: Re: New Predator II Question
Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 01:53:48 GMT

In article <54698@hydra.gatech.EDU> ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz)  
writes:
> If they're really only here for the sport of it, then there is no reason
> why they would get pissed at earth.
> 
> Would you expect every human in the world to suddenly start killing
> all the deer just because some people have been killed while hunting?

So, like, when *was* the last time a human hunter was killed by a deer?  
:-)

--andre@wri.com-----------------------------------------------------------
                      "I'm tired of keepin' my cookies in the cookie jar."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: v115p8d6@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Quenby M Chunco)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Please help identify a quote
Keywords: Jane
Date: 7 Apr 92 17:51:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: acsu.1992Apr7.165233.1855
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <92Apr5.212354edt.9047@rock.db.toronto.edu>, fche@db.toronto.edu writes...
>Does anyone know where the line
> 
>	"Jane, you ignorant slut!"
> 
>comes from?
> 

Saturday Night Live. Point Counter point with Jane Curtain and Dan Ackroyd.



> 
>-- Frank Ch. Eigler -- Comp Eng -- <eigler@ecf.toronto.edu> --
From: kettyle@cbnewsi.cb.att.com (john.jr.kettyle)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Sharon Stone on SNL
Date: 15 Apr 92 14:53:40 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Apr15.064700.8063@news.Hawaii.Edu>, teshima@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (A. Lani Teshima) writes:
> 
> I realize SNL is on TV, but since we've had threads on Basic Instincts
> here and all, I'm posting in this newsgroup.
> 
> When Sharon Stone did her opening monologue on SNL the other weekend,
> there were a few very vocal people in the audience that kept yelling
> things to her. Did anyone catch what they were saying? I had a feeling
> they were hecklers saying something negative about her role in Basic
> Instincts, because they were very rude, interrupting her monologue to
> where it made her pause to compose herself momentarily.
> Any ideas?
> Thanks in advance! :)
> 

I heard on the news here that 6 people were taken into custody of the 
police and/or NBC security. They were protestors heckling her over the
protrayal of gays in movies.

The show went on as planned.

John
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: luoni@bosco.mlb.semi.harris.com (Perry Luoni)
Subject: Re: Jabberwoky (?)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 15:08:10 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne FL

In article <odvEIo_00awXAUA24W@andrew.cmu.edu> mc3d+@andrew.cmu.edu (Mary Rose Campbell) writes:
>
> luoni@bosco.mlb.semi.harris.com (Perry Luoni) writes :
>
>>Jabberwoky is a Monty Python movie.  
>
>Not exactly.  It was directed by either/both Terry Jones and Terry
>Gilliam, and I believe Michael Palin was in it (I'm not sure, though). 
>It was made around 1977 or so.  I saw it on tape about 8 or 10 years
>ago, so I really can't say much about it.  It's OK, but not up to the
>usual level of the people involved.
OK It's true that it is not technically a Monty Python movie.  I knew that
but I just wanted to convey that it is the same type of film that the 
Monty Python troupe make and that several of the troupe are in/direct 
Jabberwoky.  I would agree that Eric the Viking is better than Jabberwoky.
I also liked Time Bandits, A Fish called Wanda, and there is a John Cleese
film called Clockwise that is excellent.  Basically any movie that 
has some of the Monty Python guys is better than most of the shit that is
out there.  Other good movies of this type include Brazil, maybe the Fisher King
but I haven't see it.   I also liked Labryinth but it is not Monty Python.  It
is however a fantasy type film, and contains Jennifer Connaly. 
The thing about Monty Python type films is that most people either love them
or hate them there isn't much middle ground.  I love them.
From: mcginnis-john@CS.YALE.EDU (John McGinnis)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jabberwoky (?)
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:16:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.1992Apr15.171657.14895
Distribution: usa
Organization: Yale University Computer Science Dept., New Haven, CT 06520-2158

In article <1992Apr15.152114.20106@mlb.semi.harris.com> luoni@bosco.mlb.semi.harris.com (Perry Luoni) writes:
>Jabberwoky is a Monty Python movie.  It is one my least favorite 
>of the Monty Python movies.  It is out on video.  I does have some 
>funny moments but it is slow at times also.  The best of the Monty
>Python movies is THE HOLY GRAIL

Jabberwocky was not a Python movie.  Yes it had Python people (the main
character was played by Michael Palin), but it was not a movie done by the
group as a whole.  It is a fairly funny movie - not as funny as THE HOLY GRAIL
or THE MEANING OF LIFE, but there definitely some good scenes.  I would
recommend renting the video some time.

- John

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: John McGinnis, PC '93 : PO Box 7266 Yale Stn :  mcginnis-john@cs.yale.edu   :
: (203) 436-1460        : New Haven, CT 06520  : mcginnis@suncis.ycc.yale.edu :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------