HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jvbutera@grad04.math.ncsu.edu (Jeffrey V. Butera)
Subject: Re: Virginia WINS
Organization: NCSU Mathematics Dept.
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 12:20:14 GMT

In article <1992Sep29.220312.15753@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jbc4m@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (John B. Carr) writes:
* In article <1992Sep27.035736.21120@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
*WAHOO@VIRGINIA.EDU writes:
*
*	Well, here goes (dons robe of the high priest of UVa
*anti-woofing) I fear that Wake Forest will defeat us, they have a
*really solid defense.

Pathetic.  Now your starting to sound like your official anti-woofing
coach.  He actually said before the Duke game something to the effect
of:

"Well, they're a goo dunit and can keep up with anyone in the conference,
blah blah blah, ad neaseum...."

Could he just come out and say that Duke didn't have a prayer?

*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* John Carr                           UNIX Support Specialist
* jbc4m@virginia.edu                  Academic Computing, Gilmer Hall
* 804/982-4710                        University of Virginia
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


-- 
Jeff Butera            DISCLAIMER: I claim absolutely nothing.
Math Graduate Student
N.C. State University    "Still looking for a witty quote." 
jvbutera@math.ncsu.edu                           -Brad Halls
From: vaps0de@prism.gatech.EDU (Dustin Emhart)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: question: rules concerning missed/blocked fieldgoals
Date: 30 Sep 92 20:59:31 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In <Sep28.202952.69381@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> guest@ulysses.atmos.colostate.edu (Guest) writes:

>Yes, a field goal is just like a punt (a scrimage kick). If the ball becomes
>dead in the end zone, or it goes out of bounds in the end zone, it is a touch-
>back and the ball comes out to the 20 yd line. An interesting thing is that a
>player on the defense (i.e. opposite the kicking team) can run the ball out of
>the end zone, just like a punt!

Umm, last I checked, if a kick (punt or FG attempt, *not* a kickoff) took the
ball into the end zone, the ball was dead as soon as it hit the ground or a
player in the end zone.
-- 
Dustin Emhart                       |  CS Majors: We do more after 11 pm than
Georgia Institute of Technology     |  most people do all day.
Internet: vaps0de@prism.gatech.edu  |        -- me
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: baze@carson.u.washington.edu (Behzad Khamneian)
Subject: Miami vs. Arizona
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 01:43:29 GMT

Any team that can beat Arizona 8-7 deserves my #1 vote.  NOT!!!!
What happened to all those east-coasters who knock PAC-10 teams?

Arizona:  Great effort.  The Wildcats should feel good about themselves.
Miami:    Should feel lousy.  They showed everyone that they are not the
          hot shots that they claim to be.

Some FSU fan posted about how Washington will come down in the polls because
of their lousy schedule.  Well, for the time being, the pollsters should
take the 'FSU fan's' advice and drop Miami a spot or two...   :)

Reminder:  Washington plays Arizona this year among other lowly PAC-10 teams
           that don't compare to DA MIGHTY (wimpy) CANEZ!!!!

With regards,

-Baze

:)  :)  :)  :)  Miami 8-7  YES YES YES!!



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: istre@ricevm1.rice.edu
Subject: Re: Obnoxious Maryland TD Celebrations
Organization: Rice University  
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 15:46:59 GMT

In article <6860@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>
hpb@hpb.cis.pitt.edu (Harry Bloomberg) writes:
 
>
>
>   My trip to Maryland for the Panther-Turtle fiasco went well.
>Maryland's campus is lovely, it's fans loud but well-behaved, and the
>football was exciting although disappointing for Pitt fans.  However, I
>have one small nit to pick with the Maryland fans.
>
>   Their post-score celebrations are damaging to one's hearing.  They
>celebrate with such enthusiasm that one is led to believe that
>a Marlyand score is a rare event.
>
>   Here's what happens after Maryland scores a touchdown:
>
>   - A very loud cannon is fired.  The first time I heard this, I jumped
>about 3 feet in the air and almost spilled a drink on my cameras.  You
>can feel a kick in your chest when the cannon goes off.
>
>   - After the PAT, the cannon is again detonated.
>
>   - An air-raid siren is piped into the PA system at ear-splitting
>levels for around 30 seconds.  If you think 30 seconds is a short period
>of time, have a friend call you on the phone and let it ring for 30
>seconds.  You'll change your mind.
>
>   - Finally, a boater's CO2 air horn is beeped once for each point in
>Maryland's total.
>
>   Maryland scored 47 points Saturday night.  I left the game damn near
>deaf.  The next time I'm asked to photograph a game there, I'm dragging
>an OSHA inspector and a decible meter along.  :-)
>
>Harry Bloomberg
>hpb@vms.cis.pitt.edu
 
The cannon makes me think about when I attended the 1979 Texas-Texas A&M
game in College Station. I was sitting with my sister and brother-in-law
both of whom are Aggies.
 
At that time, UT brought a cannon to all their games which they would shoot
off every time the Horns would score. During this game, the UT people put
the cannon at the closed end of Kyle Field just in front of the tunnel.
 
Well, this game was not and did not go well for the Horns. Despite being
a heavy favorite, the Horns were getting outplayed by the underdog Aggies.
Midway through the 3rd quarter right after a UT turnover, a group of Aggie
corpsmen ran out of the tunnel, jumped on the cannon, and shot it off before
the UT cheerleaders manning the cannon knew what was happening. They then
ran off down the Aggie sideline with the cheerleaders in hot pursuit and
virtually every Aggie in the stadium howling in laughter. With UT losing
the game, jeopardizing their chances for the Cotton Bowl, that was rubbing
salt into a very open wound.
 
My brother-in-law (A former member of the corps) told me that was a group
of freshmen who were probably goaded into that stunt by the seniors with
the promise of senior privileges for a week. He said that was a very big
deal to the freshmen in the Corps of Cadets at A&M.
 
FYI, A&M won that game 13-7.
From: fran@cs.washington.edu (Tak Ming Pang)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami, Florida
Date: 29 Sep 92 21:19:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: beaver.1992Sep29.211918.15645
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle

In article <1992Sep29.172040.20201@zip.eecs.umich.edu> rjones@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Randolph M. Jones) writes:
>In article <5653@news.duke.edu> ds4@soc5.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS) writes:
>>Well I guess we will never know about Washington since they do not play anyone of
>>note.
>
>...except for 8 teams from the strongest conference in the country.


I am not so sure if Miami has a more tough schedule than anybody,
but I am sure they have a tough time to win games this year.
They would be the greatest team all time if they could continue
to win games without a running game.
From: ds4@soc15.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Bobby.Bowden.sucks.sucks.sucks
Keywords: the chockemiester, chokarama, the chokinator...
Date: 5 Oct 92 18:13:25 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.5812

In article <1992Oct4.190737.25340@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>, kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado) writes:
|> 
|> What the hell? Did "Saint Bobby" suddenly find out he is a distant relative
|> of Lou Holtz? I mean, come on! A field goal?! With our kickers?! What gives
|> with this nonsense? The clock was stopped with eight ticks to go. Anyone
|> with at least one brain cell would call a play and try for the win. But noooo.

Yes, but anyone with two brain cells would know that FSU was not able to get into
the inzone against Miami's defense.  I was wishing that FSU would go for the
touchdown on forth.....they would not have made it.

|> Not Bobby. What a dork. Hell, even a good old fashioned "hail mary" pass would
|> have been better than that sorry excuse of a call. What a waste. Poor Vanover,
|> he choose FSU cause he wanted to be on the team that wins the first national
|> championship at FSU. Well, I feel sorry for him...'cause with Bowden at the 
|> helm FSU will _NEVER_ win ans NC. Bowden has got to be the limpest dick of all
|> coaches in division 1A football.
|> 
|>  
|> --- end ranting ---
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Karl C Schudt)
Subject: Re: Miami - ND (once again)
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 02:13:05 GMT


In article <5575@news.duke.edu> ds4@soc11.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS
) writes:
>In article <1992Sep25.122608.7540@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, kschudt@magnus.a
cs.ohio-state.edu (Karl C Schudt) writes:
>
>|> I can vouch for the ugliness of Miami fans. When I was marching with
>|> the Notre Dame band in the orange bowl parade, little kids (!) were
>|> screaming ND sucks and throwing batteries at us. From anecdotal evidence
>|> this treatment was accorded to other fans of ND as well. We were'nt
>|> even playing Miami at the time, and (correct me if I'm wrong) Miami
>|> needed Notre Dame to win over Colorado for them to have the MNC.
>|> I can see why people dont want to play miami cause they have to go *to*
>|> Miami.
>|>
>|> Admittedly we weren't in Lovely Coral Gables, and the battery throwing
>|> youths were probably not UM students, but I can't see anyon
>|> wishing to subject themselves to the horrible treatment visiting
>|> teams receive from the Miami citizenry.
>|>
>|> Yours Truly,
>|> Karl Schudt
>
>Hmmmm...Karl, at least the 'evil' Miami fans never rushed onto the field to
>attack the Miami players....'88 was it.  Plus what about that time all the
Huh? what planet do you liveon Dmitri? No Notre Dame fans attacked Miami 
players! Yes there was a skirmish, but that was between the players,
not between fans and players. (Except for the unfortunate ND band members
that were hit by Miami players. Don't try to deny this one, I was in the band 
and saw it with my own eyes!)
>oranges in the area around Notre Dame were bought so they could throw them
at
the
>Miami players.  They started to, and would not have stopped if it was not for
the
>referies penelizing Notre Dame for the fans actions.

I don't know if oranges were thrown *at* Miami players, but lets think about 
this:  Oranges at people with helmets and pads on versus Batteries at
band members? Is this justice Dmitri? Are you saying that those punks
were justified in throwing duracells at me because some Miami player
had an orange land at their feet? Hmmmmm.....

I have been trying not to flame, but You, mr. Dmitri deserve a million
degree burn. ****YOU ARE A MORON****

The point that I made in my original post, without trying to be inflammatory,
was that there may be more reasons than the skill of the Hurricane football
team that keeps teams from scheduling them. Is it worth playing the
Hurricanes if your fans and team are going to be assaulted on the streets?
It just might not be fear of the team that keeps people away, but
fear of the fans! (note, i didn't say students, I said fans!)

I was very impresses with the Hurricanes performance against unranked Arizona,
by the way. *chuckle*

Karl
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund)
Subject: Re: Washington 17, USC 10
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 92 17:25:35 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1992Oct3.225613.15739@u.washington.edu> yeonwook@hardy.u.washington.edu (Mark Choi) writes:
>
>
>Well...the game's over, Washington won 17 to 10. USC fought hard and
>should definitely move up in the poll standings. Washington's defense was
>excellent, but the offense was horrible. Washington was unable to do 
>ANYTHING with their offense. All of Washington's points came from defensive
>related plays (turnovers, etc.). I credit the poor performance of 
>Washington's defense to the defense of USC. In any case, Washington still
>came away with a win. 
>-- 
>    .  .      +---------------------------------+
>  --|--|      | Mark Yeon Wook Choi             |
>   /.\ |      | yeonwook@hardy.u.washington.edu |
>  --|--|      +---------------------------------+  

Yes, the offense didnt do very well.  Part of it was due to an excellent job
by the $C defense...and part of it seemed to be play calling.  Washington
really didnt open up the offense until late in the 4th quarter and then
they had some success (might have scored if not for Napolean's fumble ).
I wonder how much of Washington's offensive difficulties are due to
losing their Offensive Coordinator?  In any case,  I think the offense is
still OK... with a little more time I think they can put it together.   
Remember, last year they only scored 14 points against U$C with their
supposedly more powerfull offense!

Another thing, when the offense didnt move the ball they did do other things
right.  No damaging turnovers and always manged to give U$C the ball deep
in their own territory (credit the defense for this also).

Of course nothing needs to be said about the defense!!!  Simply dominating!
Sure the Condoms had some running success...but the important thing is that
they could never muster enought to get points.  That is the real key to 
Washingtons defense...you might get some yards on them...but NOT many points.

Well, the Bears be next!  Should also be a good game!  And now the Arizona
game is looking interesting as well!!  The Pac10 is NOT going to be the
cakewalk many people keep blabbing about!

-Eric Jaderlund
 jade@triton.unm.edu
From: azzarito@cse.fau.edu (Doug Azzarito)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: WEEKLY TOP 25
Date: 4 Oct 92 20:55:05 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA


      -----=====< The A.P. Top 25 >=====-----

THIS LAST
WEEK WEEK  SCHOOL      W L T  Last Week's Results          Next Game
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 1    1  Washington    4 0 0  WON v. SouthernCal, 17-10    v. California,10/10
 2    2  Miami         4 0 0  WON v. Florida St, 19-16     at Penn St., 10/10
 3    4  Michigan      3 0 1  WON v. Iowa, 52-28           v. MichiganSt,10/10
 4    7  Tennessee     5 0 0  WON at LSU, 20-0             v. Arkansas,10/10
 5    5  Texas A&M     5 0 0  WON v. Texas Tech, 19-17     v. Rice, 10/17
 6    9  Alabama       5 0 0  WON v. S. Carolina, 48-7     at Tulane, 10/10
 7    8  Penn State    5 0 0  WON at Rutgers, 38-24        v. Miami, 10/10
 8    3  Florida St    4 1 0  LOST at Miami, 19-16         v. N.Carolina,10/10
 9   10  Colorado      4 0 0  -IDLE-                       at Missouri, 10/8
10   14  Virginia      5 0 0  WON at Wake Forest, 31-17    v. Clemson, 10/10
11   18  Stanford      4 1 0  WON at Notre Dame, 33-16     at UCLA,10/10
12   16  Georgia       4 1 0  WON at Arkansas, 27-3        v. GeorgiaSo,10/10
13    6  Notre Dame    3 1 1  LOST v. Stanford, 33-16      at Pitt, 10/10
14   15  Nebraska      3 1 0  -IDLE-                       v. OklahomaSt,10/10
15   17  Syracuse      3 1 0  WON at Louisville, 15-9      v. Rutgers,10/10
16   19  Oklahoma      3 1 0  v. Iowa St., 17-3            at Texas 10/10
17   23  Georgia Tech  3 1 0  WON v. NC State, 16-13       at Maryland,10/10
18   24  Miss. State   3 1 0  WON v. Florida, 30-6         v. Auburn, 10/10
19   11  UCLA          3 1 0  LOST at Arizona, 23-3        v. Stanford, 10/10
20   20  Southern Cal  1 1 1  LOST at Washington, 17-10    v. Oregon 10/10
21   22  Boston Coll   4 0 1  TIED at W.Virginia, 24-24    at PennSt, 10/17
21   12  Ohio State    3 1 0  LOST at Wisconsin, 20-16     v. Illinois,10/10
23   13  Florida       1 2 0  LOST at Miss. State, 30-6    v. LSU, 10/10
24   --  California    3 1 0  WON v. Oregon St, 42-0       at Wash, 10/10
25   25  Clemson       2 2 0  WON v. UT-Chatt., 54-3       at Virginia, 10/10
25   21  NC State      4 2 0  LOST at GeorgiaTech, 16-13   v. TexasTech,10/10

(not a typo, there's a tie for 21st and 25th this week!)
From: rszczerb@tolstoy.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami, Florida
Date: 28 Sep 92 15:20:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Sep28.152020.7495
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame

In article <92272.094015JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu> <JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>In article <Bv9sMJ.Lzr@encore.com>, jfawcett@encore.com (Jason Fawcett) says:
>>
>>News-Software: NN 6.4.16
>>
>>In <1992Sep27.230815.20234@news.nd.edu> rszczerb@joplin.helios.nd.edu (Robert
>>Szczerba) writes:
>>
>>Miami found a way to win, while playing poorly.  Just like all great teams
>>do that don't panic and play for a tie.
>>

Hey, be careful with the attributions.  There's no way I would write
that last statement.

		- rob
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mjo@beat.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Michael J. Oatley)
Subject: Re: div II rankings for Jacksonville St.?
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 01:46:16 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.195922.25247@infonode.ingr.com>, ellingrw@infonode.ingr.com (Bob Ellington) writes:
|> 
|> After Jacksonville State kissed Missisister College 14-14, what did
|> they end up as in the Div II polls?
|> 
|> Thanks (Why won't USA Today put this poll in the paper?)
|> Bob E.

Well, Bob, if you'd save a quarter and by a Huntsville News in the morning
on your way to ingr-land, you'd see:

Div. II Poll

1. Pitt St.
2. Indian, Pa
3. N. Dakota St.
4. Texas A&I
5. Jax State
6. Edinboro

etc.,

North Alabama checks in at #19, btw.


	Michael J. Oatley		
	Intergraph Corp.		"When the going gets weird, 
        Huntsville, AL			 the weird turn pro."
	mjo@beat.b24a.ingr.com			Hunter S. Thompson
	205/730-8738


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: beckham@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Jeff Beckham)
Subject: Re: Notre Dame- Stanford (sigh)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 19:00:46 GMT

kschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Karl C Schudt) writes:
>Let me be the first ND fan to eat crow. Chomp CHomp..... blech!
>Stanford played very well in the second half and took advantage
>of some very costly Irish turnovers. For some reason Mirer was high on
>his passes all day. He was throwing to open people, but just couldn't
>hit them.
>     Griggs fumble in the first half was dubious, but all the other
>Irish turnovers were genuine, and Stanford did well to get 21 points out of 
>them.
>     Notre Dame didnt seem ready to play today. I don't thiNk it was any
>genius of Bill Walsh, just Irish turnovers and lackluster play.
>Congratulations Stanford!  (sigh)
>(Now of course, all questions about playing for a tie are moot :) :)   )

I LOVE IT!!  Notre Dame loses!!!  There is justice in this world after all...
It was a very good game though. 


  			   	   --------------------------------------------
								  Jeff Beckham
						      beckham@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
 					 	  Computer Science/Mathematics
                                    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
				   --------------------------------------------
From: "al sorhaindo" <al.sorhaindo@execnet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: reversals
Date: 25 Sep 92 16:42:55 EST
Reply-To: "al sorhaindo" <al.sorhaindo@execnet.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Executive Networks Information

  WHAT A DIFFERENCE A YEAR MAKES!!!


There have been several games this fall in which the score has differed
greatly from last season's.

1992                                  1991

West Virginia 44 PITTSBURGH 06        Pittsburgh 34 WEST VIRGINIA 03

Penn St.      24 CINCINNATI 20        PENN ST.   81 Cincinnati    00

PURDUE        41 California 14        CALIFORNIA 42 Purdue        18

HOUSTON       33 Illinois   16        ILLINOIS   51 Houston       10

Colorado      21 MINNESOTA  20        COLORADO   55 Minnesota     00

NEW MEXICO    24 TCU        07        TCU        60 New Mexico    07

Space does not allow the inclusion of mere 50 point swings.

Oddly, West Virginia and Pittsburgh have been taking turns spanking
each other on the ROAD. The home team has not won in that series since
at least 1986.

                                Al
---
  DeLuxe 1.21 #11688  al.sorhaindo@execnet.com
--
Executive Network Information System  (914) 667-4567
International ILink Host
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rszczerb@joplin.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Subject: Re: Miami - ND (once again)
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 23:05:44 GMT

In article <5575@news.duke.edu> ds4@soc11.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS) writes:
>
>Hmmmm...Karl, at least the 'evil' Miami fans never rushed onto the field to
>attack the Miami players....'88 was it.  

What in the world are you babbling about?  ND fans rushed onto the
field to celebrate a great win over the mighty CANES.  I think you're
getting a little bit ridiculous with your comments.

		- Rob
From: ds4@soc6.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami, Florida
Date: 29 Sep 92 03:04:48 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.133226.4975@news.nd.edu>, rszczerb@dickens.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba) writes:
|> In article <Bv9sMJ.Lzr@encore.com> jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett) writes:
|> >News-Software: NN 6.4.16
|> >
|> >Miami found a way to win, while playing poorly.  Just like all great teams
|> >do that don't panic and play for a tie.   
|> >
|> 
|> With Miami losing 7-2 and then winning 8-7, I'm really curious how those
|> mighty Canes could have tried to play for a tie? :)   When you guys start
|> playing some Division I-A schools (and wining by more than one point)
|> then I'll start taking your comments seriously. 

So what you are saying, is that it is ok to tie, but not to win by one point?

-ds4
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: Bowl alliance a crock!
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 22:44:49 GMT

In article <1afkhjINN7eb@agate.berkeley.edu> wft@soda.berkeley.edu (William F. Tell) writes:
>
>Even though Arizona lost, I think they once again proved that
>the Pac 10 is the strongest conference in football.  Washington,
>UCLA, USC, Stanford, and California are all top 25 teams (Ok, Cal is #27).

I hate to say this about ND, but they are going to beat at least 2 pac-10
teams this year.

>The Pac 10 is a rugged conference and when a team goes undefeated it
>is quite an acheivement.   Arizona is not one of the better teams in
>the conference and look at what it does to the #1 team.

You have a short memory, don't you? Remember purude???
The great teams are the ones who can win on a bad day... 
Winning is everything.

>William F. Tell
Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Goob/Cliff  Re: TEXAS vs. ou
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Date: Tue,  6 Oct 1992 13:15:43 CST
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Distribution: usa
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


In article <1992Oct6.124611.23629@dvorak.amd.com>, chrisk@nucleus.amd.com (Chris Kosh) writes:
>Would someone in this newsgroup please pass the word to the
>peons in oklahoma that its time once again.  Let them know to
>go ahead and begin talking because they simply cannot beat a 
>team from a superior state, regardless of talent, tradition,
>ranking, or record.
>
>See ya in Dallas, if you can find your way and the telegraphs
>get the message that far.
>
>		For the fourth year in a row, 
>
Dear UGooberHeads(or is it Heads of UGoober?):

Sending a freshly graduated goober after me was nice and all, but
I think I deserve something a bit better than this bait.  

It is good to see that your school has made its way to UTexas fans.
Not a bad start, but this student needs a few more lessons.

Cordially,
Scott Davis(The Big8 Reporter)
--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college