HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gogo@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (donald.gogolin)
Subject: Re: Browns Trick Play
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Distribution: bl
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 15:25:46 GMT
Summary: tricky, tricky

In article <1992Nov4.133234.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu>, f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin) writes:
> In article <1992Nov4.103321.9256@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>, mocnik@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:
> > The "trick" play was done so quickly, that the TV was showing the replay of 
> > the previous play. They came back as Metcalf was throwing. This was confusing.
> > Also TV was not prepared to tape this play and therefore was unable to show
> > a replay.
> >
> >  What follows is from the Radio description and newspapers accounts:
> > [explication of how the trick play worked]
> >
> > Also, the NFL teams meet with the referees before each game, so that
> > any "trick" plays can be identified. I believe the Browns did not tell them.
> 
> I had never heard of this practice before.  Is it in the NFL rulebook, or
> is it simply custom for NFL teams to identify their trick plays to the refs?
> 
> Reminds me of the controversy over the No-Fun League.  It's a sad day for
> all of American sport when an innovative play has to be "cleared" with
> bureaucratic functionaries.  Sigh.

The purpose of informing the officials is not to clear the play with them,
but to alert them that something out of the ordinary may happen so that
they are not surprised and caught off guard.  Much like what happened in
Cincinnati.  Had the officials known what was going on, the penalty may not
have been called.  This was a coaching oversite.  Not that it mattered!
From: trradrx@canctr.mc.duke.edu (R.CLOUGH)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Scud's Back.....
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:51:15 GMT
Reply-To: trradrx@canctr.mc.duke.edu
Organization: Duke U. Med. Ctr., Durham, NC


 .....and Raider fans mourn.  Todd M. said that he would be benched this week
in favor of Jay Schroeder.  Jay actually managed to get a TD for the team last
week.  He'll get to practice on Seattle, but things get ugly after that.
Is it too late to bring George Blanda out of retirement? Daryle Lamonica?
Snake Stabler? Plunk? How bout Dan Pastorini? No? Marc Wilson, maybe?
(Can you tell I'm getting desperate for a QB?)
  In that worst trade thread, the Raiders worst trade had to have been Jay
Schroeder for Jim Lachey.  This was made even worse by the fact that they had
no intention of keeping Lachey at all.
  Some of the better trades: Getting Mike Haynes from the Patriots for not
much at all.  Getting Dickerson from the Colts for a bowl of soup wasn't too
bad either.  Then there are the scrap heap acquisitions, like Plunkett.  The
best ever may have been getting that RB from BYU from Dallas for a warm
handshake and converting him into one of the greatest tight ends that ever
lived: Todd Christensen. 
	Robert Clough, DUMC (though still not speaking for them)
"Next to Keith Richards, Sacramento looks great."--Pete Vecsey, on the Kings'
  chances this year.
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cities chosen for Super Bowl sites?
Date: 6 Nov 92 22:22:20 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

In article <1992Nov6.151320.5806@oakhill.sps.mot.com>, floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Floyd Goodrich) writes:
>>How are cities chosen for Super Bowl sites? 
> 
> Well, this year's Super Bowl was moved from Phoenix to the LA area.  They
> felt that Arizona was just too racist.  Ironic, huh?

For those of you who didn't get the news, Arizona voters finally approved a
paid MLK/Civil Rights Day holiday.  This should assure Phoenix (ah, Tempe)
of hosting the Super Bowl in 1996.

In any case, the selection site is chosen about 2.5 years before the big
game, and cities campaign for it.  The NFL owners make the final decision.
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: brw@owlnet.rice.edu (Bradley Robert Wilson)
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Organization: Rice University
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:16:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.165931.14970@eng.umd.edu>, edquist@eng.umd.edu (Karl T. Edquist) writes:
|> 
|> In article <10NOV199212231625@mitme5.mit.edu>, kettler@mitme5.mit.edu (KETTLER, THOMAS R.) writes:
|> >In article <92314.091550RZANDBER@ESOC.BITNET>, RZANDBER@ESOC.BITNET (RENE ZANDBERGEN)      writes...
|> >>OJ Simpson was the first ever to do it, and Dickerson the only other
|> >>player. Didn't he accomplish this in his rookie year? Didn't he
|> >>even do it twice? Or maybe the first time he only came very
|> >>close (like 1995 or so).
|> >> 
|> >>Rene Zandbergen
|> >
|> >If I remember correctly, Dickerson gained 1808 yards rushing his first year in 
|> >1983 (?). That broke the rookie record for rushing but I do not remember who 
|> >had it before him. Also, Curt Warner came into the NFL the same year and broke 
|> >the AFC rookie rushing record with "Ground Chuck's" Seattle team.
|> >
|> >					Sincerely yours,
|> >
|> >					Thomas R. Kettler "Bengals Fanatic" 
|> 
|> I'm pretty sure Earl Campbell held the rookie record before Dickerson.  Campbell had
|> something like 1450 yards in 1978.


I believe Ottis Anderson was the first to break Campbell's record with 1603
yards his rookie year (1979?).
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jeffr@ssec.wisc.edu (Jeff Ramin)
Subject: idiotic posts
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Space Science and Engineering Center
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 22:04:30 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.170326.19828@sequent.com>, newson@sequent.com (Newson) writes:
|> In article <BxICqp.Aw7@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> brown@venus.iucf.indiana.edu writes:
|> >In article <1992Nov9.200005.21562@ccd.harris.com>, bdb@controls.ccd.harris.com (Bill D. Buckalew) writes...
|> >> 
|> >>Does anyone know if Deion is expected to play tonight?  Look for 
|> >>J. Rice to have less than 3 receptions and under 25 yards if Prime
|> >>Time plays, and the Falcons to stomp the 'niners at home 
|> >>in the dome.
|> >> 
|> >>"Elvis lives" -- Jerry Glanville
|> >
|> >    N    N      OOO    TTTTTTT   !       Ha, Ha Neon Dion, Prime Time
|> >    NN   N     O   O      T      !       SUCKED last night!!! So did
|> >    N N  N     O   O      T      !       his butt buddy Andre Rison!!
|> >    N  N N     O   O      T      !
|> >    N   NN     O   O      T              41 - 3  Ha, Ha Ha !!!!!!!!!!!
|> >    N    N      OOO       T      !
|> >                                                                B**2
|> 
|> This kind of response is what frustrates me the most about this net. Yes the
|> ball bounced the 49ers way, and I love it but replies like the above are 
|> uncalled for. There is no need to piss off everybody on the net. It would be
|> nice to see resaonable posts for once instead of this adolescent bullshit.
|> 
|> Don Newson
|> Sequent Computer Systems

I agree completely.  Tops on the list of idiots are the Bills/Dolphins fans.
They spew crap like this before the game is played, which is even worse.
Organization: Computer Operations, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Thu,  5 Nov 1992 10:48:12 -0500 
From: "Jim Thomas Park , Jr." <jp45+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: 90's and Dallas? Maybe?

>From: jasmith@admin1.memst.edu
>Subject: 90's and Dallas? Maybe?
>Date: 4 Nov 92 13:49:39 -0600
       >  This team is young enough to just maybe 
       >  become the team of the 90's.  To go down in history be hide the 
      >   powerfull teams like Green Bay Packers of the 1960s, the Pittsburgh
     >    Steelers of the 1970's, and the Fourty Niners of the 1980's.
     >    Let's hear for the inaugural season of the team of the 1990's.
     >       The DALLAS COWBOYS the team of the 90's.

The way things are starting to look here in Pittsburgh Dallas may again
be overshadowed by the Steelers. I am not saying this as an expert but
the same pattern happened in the seventies. the Steelers quietly did the
job and then destroyed other teams when the time came. take a look at
the stats for SB 9 when the Steelers wiped put the Vikes. All this talk
is premature as we are just halfway through the season. The playoffs
this year will definitely be interesting this year.

					-Jim
Welcome to the Blast Furnace...........

 
***************************************************************
 Hey Man, I'm  drinking wine, eating cheese and catching some rays.

				Oddball
	  			 From Kelly's Heros
***************************************************************
From: mas@aero.org (Marcus A.Shaw)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cowboys Robert Williams
Date: 10 Nov 1992 20:45:49 GMT
Organization: The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: aerospace.aero.org

In article <1992Nov10.133328.12534@ccd.harris.com> mh@controls.ccd.harris.com (Michael Haselden) writes:
>
>I thought Robert Williams was claimed by Phoenix on waivers.
>However, in watching a tape of the 'boys/lions game, I saw
>williams on the sidelines and on special teams. Any idea
>what`s going on?
>

Mike (et al...),

R. Williams WAS claimed by Phoenix on waivers but apparently couldn't pass
the physical given by the team.  They released him and now he is back with 
the Cowboys.  I was almost as surprised by his return as by his departure,
I wonder if he already got rid of his apartment?

*ice*


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: t_trunc@chips.bash.edu (Tursiops Truncatus)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Miami Dolphins 6-1
Date: 5 Nov 92 23:18:51 GMT
Organization: Buffalo Chips Pathology, Inc.

In article <92306.194257JMC162@psuvm.psu.edu> JMC162@psuvm.psu.edu writes:

>A wake up call.  The Dolphins need a blow horn to wake them up!  I'm counting d
>own the day to the rematch.  Prediction Buffalo: 31 Fish: 14.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!  The "Fish n' Chips Bowl"  I LOVE IT!!

But you've gotten the score wrong, child!  Roby's back, Bobby Harden is 
back, Offerdahl and Jackson are going to be healthy and Kelly ain't!

No Mercy on the Chips!!

Miami - 42 
Chips - 3

TT
Tursiops Truncatus 
*************************************************************************
GREAT MOMENTS IN BUFFALO HISTORY:  Thurmon Thomas loses his helmet during 
the opening series of SuperBowl XXVI
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pboxrud@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul D Boxrud)
Subject: Re: Randal benched for WEEK TEN
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 19:19:20 GMT

If my memory serves me correctly I don't think the Packers ever beat Jim 
McMahon (sp?) in his days with the evil :-) Bears.  I think if I were Kotite, I
would let Jim play the GB game as well.  Any comments?

Paul
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jdhl@troi.cc.rochester.edu (papa_sm00sh)
Subject: Re: JGH computer rankings
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 16:56:40 GMT

In <BxMAwq.17o@acsu.buffalo.edu> v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:

>How can Buffalo be seventh!  They are a better team than the Saints,
>Vikings, and Eagles.  The 49'ers are better than these teams too.
>The Redskins are not better than the Bills.  Here is my top 10 from 
>top 13.
> 1) Cowboys
> 2) 49'ers
> 3) Buffalo
> 4) Miami
> 5) Vikings
> 6) Saints
> 7) Giants
> 8) Redskins
> 9) Steelers
>10) Oilers
 i tend to agree with your ranking more than with John's, but you have
to remember that buffalo has played very poorly offensively 4 of the
last 5 weeks... the ranking of a team is not a measure of how good the
team can be when all is clicking but on the expected value of that
team when it take the field,... the best way to do this is to use
weighted averages of past performances weighting the most recent the
heaviest in most cases, then throwing in a few more dummy variables
like turf vs, natuiral grass etc... because of buffalo's play 4 of the
last 5, i think they should be rated a little lower than 3, but maybe
not as far down as 7... 

of course... if i were a little better at programming and had a way of
importing the data much easier than by hand, I would come up with my
own ranking... anyone want to send me a copy of their's and tell me
how to get the dadjusted data into the computer automatically (i.e.,
not by hand)? ... until then, i will just use my brain... which
probably works much better anyway...

jason
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Most Overrated Teams, Players, Coaches.
Organization: AT&T
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 19:46:05 GMT

In article <jono.721609065@bruce.cs.monash.edu.au> jono@cs.monash.edu.au (Jonathan Oliver) writes:
>I would tend to agree with you. During the 90s Elways is just not the same,
>but in the late 80s he took some teams to the superbowl that did not deserve
>to be there.
>	The Denver defense decimated by Doug Williams was slow and undersized.
>I just don't know how Elway got them there.

That's easy. 

The Oilers of 87 sucked. They had a behemoth offensive line
but they tried to beat the Broncos by tricks and gimmicks. Anybody 
remembered their "Stagger Lee" play on their own goal line?
Of course, when they have the talent to beat an inferior opponent,
Moon and Glanville always found a way to lose it.

The Browns of 87 sucked too. Bernie self-destructed at the beginning
of the game (2 int? or 1 int 1 fumble) and gave the Broncos two easy scores. 
Their defense couldn't tackle, and that led to Denver's final two TD. In 
a 38-33 game, 28 points were gift-wrapped.

The caliber of playoff oppositions the AFC offered, even the Cardinals could
have reached the Super Bowl had they been an AFC team.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: 49ers Kick ASS AGAIN!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 05:21:54 GMT

Does the score 41-3 indicate an ass whooping? Well,
in reality the lame Falcon gave away 6 TO's and
that is not going to help any team win games in the
NFL. The Saints and Niners are heading for a 
showdown. Any of these two teams can go all the
way at this juncture for the NFC, IMHO.

It is hard for me to give an accurate analysis
of the Niners D, because the Falcons were totally
lame out there, or were they. The Stats department
was not all that glorious, but the score sure was.

Do the Falcons truly SUCK as bad as they looked on
fucking MNF?
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
"I do not think that winning is the most important thing. 
I think winning is the only thing."    - Bill Veeck
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pboxrud@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul D Boxrud)
Subject: Re: Packer Notes...
Keywords: Oglesby, Eagles
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 22:17:38 GMT


GB also plays relatively well at County Stadium vs Lambeau.  (Probably because 
they always play the Bears at GB)  Maybe this week they will cut down on the 
number of 16 yd punts :-)

Paul
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ingram@dirac.phys.washington.edu (Doug Ingram)
Subject: Re: The seventies returneth
Organization: University of Washington
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 21:43:01 GMT

perobert%asylum.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Paul Roberts) writes:

>In article <ingram.720808653@dirac>, ingram@dirac.phys.washington.edu (Doug Ingram) writes:
>|> 
>|> 	The only marginal Dallas supporter ever in the booth is Verne
>|> Lundquist (started off as a sportscaster on the Dallas ABC affiliate

>What about Dandy Don Meridith?
>Well I guess he was more than just a marginal Dallas supporter.

	Monday Night Football announcers (except maybe...MAYBE on a really
good day Frank Gifford) are dreck, so I generally try to forget they exist.
But the point is taken.  To be honest, I've blocked so many bad MNF broadcasts
out of my memory, I don't remember how objective Dandy Don was, but if I
ever hear anyone sing "Turn out the lights..." again, I think I'll have
to break several laws in the course of my revenge.  Half :).

Doug Ingram -- ingram@u.washington.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gogo@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (donald.gogolin)
Subject: Re: Browns News- Nov 10th (More Oiler game notes)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Distribution: bl
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 16:13:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.084843.9299@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>, mocnik@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:

>    - Eric Metcalf - he dances too much, but he was able to get some decent
>                     punt returns. He puts a lot of fear in the defense,
>                     especially on the carpet. 

I have been very impressed with Metcalf this year.  I don't mind his dancing
on punt returns.  What ever he can do for more yards --- go for it.
From the backfield he looks like a totally different player.  The Texas 2-step
has been virtually non-existent.  He moves quickly to the hole and lowers his
head and shoulders for whatever additional yeardage he can muster.  Belichick
has been good for this guy!

>    - Lawyer Tillman - had a few nice catches even with the bruised ribs.
>                     The wait was worth it. He's the best WR on the team.

No doubt!!  Lawyer Tillman is paying dividends.  No wonder the Browns were
so high on this guy.  I love watching him play.  His presence on the field
seems to enhance Michael Jackson as well, although he had his usual dropped
TD pass of the game.  Too bad Tillman hasn't been available until now!

>    Todd does not have a lot of NFL experience, and it would be very stupid
>    on the Browns part to start him over Tomczak, IMHO. Todd should be activated
>    so he can be the backup though. Brad Goebel seems destined to be cut.
> 


AGREED!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sbs9276@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Subject: The AFC--Bills Dolphs Steelers 
Reply-To: sbs9276@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 20:25:30 GMT


      I agree with other posters in this group that the Steelers
are in the drivers seat for the AFC. Although they have the same
record as the Bills and Dolphs, it can't help but be noted that
the last eight games of the seasons for the Bills and Dolphs are
going to be really tough. I think 12 games wins the AFC home
field, and for Pittsburg (playing as they are) 12 games is within
reach. However-- this weekend's game between the Bills and Steelers
is possibly a preview of an AFC Championship. I'll be there doing my
best to assure a Bills win!!

      I'm curious as to the opinion of the Dolphins fans out
there. They seem to be in really tough shape-- losing two games
to less than great teams as they head into the hardest part of
their schedule (Bills, 49ers, Hou, Den, Raiders). Might be fold
time in Miami...See you on Monday night...

      -Steve

      P.S. what's the deal with all the Steelers fans in this
group? Come out of the woodwork Patsies fans.

      P.P.S. Top 10 reasons to watch a Seattle game is awesome!!
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Koontz Computer Predictions - Week 11
Date: 11 Nov 1992 15:29:23 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Distribution: rec
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

>In article <1261@fozzy.UUCP> ckoontz@fozzy.UUCP (Carl H. Koontz) writes:
>>Well, I should have known that as soon as I made my picks public I would have
>>a bad week. I was 6-8 last week bringing my yearly total to a still impressive
>Please.
>>Comments welcome.

Where were the smileys :-)




       *********************************
       *	N.Ramasubramanian      *    	    
       *********************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,rec.sport.football.college
From: swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: Crazy & Fake Plays 
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 12:27:43 GMT
From: swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Crazy & Fake Plays 
Date: 10 Nov 92 07:23:47 CDT
Distribution: usa

In article <1992Nov9.203633.10848@infonode.ingr.com>, ellingrw@infonode.ingr.com (Bob Ellington) writes:
> In article <1992Nov7.234712.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:
>>In article <1992Nov6.224639.19117@rtsg.mot.com>, swenson.rtsg.mot.com (R. Scott Swenson) writes:
>>
>>A few years ago, Auburn was playing Tennessee at home and had a decisive
>>lead with a few seconds to play.  With the ball deep in VOL territory and
.
. (AU-Vol nonsense deleted)
.
> 
> I remember this play, was it really that long ago?  I was thinking that
> Stan White did this but it may have been Burger.

I'm pretty sure it wasn't Stan.  In Stan's 1st AU-Tennessee game at Auburn,
the game ended in a tie.  Tennessee won last year.

It COULD have been Reggie Slack back in 1988, naaah, I still think it was
Jeff Burger (must have been 1986).
-- 
David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@accs.duc.auburn.edu
From: stretz@carson.u.washington.edu (Robert Stretz)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Top Ten Reasons to Go to A Seahawks Game
Date: 5 Nov 92 16:54:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Nov5.165431.15335
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <1992Nov5.051646.11431@serval.net.wsu.edu> jjungbau@gimli.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer) writes:
>
>Say what you will about the Hawks, but I contend that there
>are many benefits to going to see them play.  Here then are
>the top 10 reasons to go to a Hawks game:
>
>From the home office in Pullman, Washington...
>
>10. Great study atmosphere
> 9. Improved Kingdome public address system
> 8. None of those annoying SB or conference
>    championship flags hanging around
> 7. Blue and green very soothing to the eyes
> 6. Don't have to shout to talk to your friend
>    sitting two sections over
> 5. Warm feeling you get from knowing you've been
>    such a good host to opposing team
> 4. No strain on vocal chords, palms, etc.
> 3. Don't have to worry about those sudden home-team
>    TDs that plague other stadiums, causing fans to 
>    rise and spill their beer
> 2. None of those heated discussions in the seats about "whether we'll
>    make the playoffs," or "why we couldn't punch it in last time we
>    were in the red zone"
> 1. Kingdogs! 

  0. Nice Sunday afternoon drive trying to find parking in Seattle.

 -1. Football? or Church?, Hmmm??? 

 -2. To see how the Huskies (or Cougars*) farm team is doing... 
     (*Some of them Wazzu Coug's are touchy, right Jim?)

 -3. Ken Behring is looking for an excuse to move the Seahawks to Oakland. 

 -4. Why stay home for free and watch a real football game, when you can
     pay $30 for a good nap.
>
>
>Any additions, comments, etc. are more than welcome.
>
>Jim
>Go Vikings, Northstars!

Rob
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.pro:23194 dc.redskins:231
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan )
Subject: Welcome Oilers to Viking-Land..
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 04:11:39 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


To the Oilers form a Vikes/Browns Fan...

Welcome Oilers Welcome...
U have welcomed everyone to ur HOUSE OF PAIN..
Now Welcome to the HOUSE OF NO GAIN for opposing offences.
Welcome, to the No.1 defence against the pass.
Welcome to be battered and bruised by a super-D that relishes 
the pass attack.
Welcome for the MOON TO BE ECLIPSED, abused, beaten and terrorized
by the Doleman, Noga & Co.
Welcome to be taught a lesson for opening ur mouths too loud at
the beginning of each season.
Welcome for the Browns to be helped by the Vikes.
Welcome to be suucessively defeated by the Brownies and the Vikes.

STATUTORY ANTI-WOOF:
The Loud mouthed Oilers will beat the Vikes 55-0 and go 12-4
and win the Super Bowl.

S.H

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro