HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 14:06:18 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         JAY SISSOM <JSISSOM@INDYCMS.BITNET>
Subject:      PSERVER/RPRINTER

We have an interesting problem.  We have a dedicated print server
(running PSERVER.EXE) on our network.  It is running print server
CSLASER.  Sometimes when people try to attach to it using Rprinter,
they get the message "Unable to connect to print server CSLASER (ed)".
This error happens after two or three minutes.

Sometimes, people can attach like normal.  Has anyone seen this happen
and know what (ed) means?

Thanks

Jay Sissom
Indiana University Department of Medicine
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL7]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 25 Aug 1992 18:40:18 MEST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Michael Such <mds@NETMBX.NETMBX.DE>
Subject:      SFT III

Hi,

I've been invited to a Novell 'info show' where they'll be talking about
various things including SFT III, my company is *VERY* interested in SFT III
- does anybody know if it is out yet or is it still vapour ware?

Thanx
Mike
--
**-   Mike Such  -  NETMBX, West Berlin.   -**
**-   E-mail: mds@netmbx.netmbx.de         -**
**-   I love it when a LAN comes together  -**
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.bitnet
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 17:00:16 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         i13@CS-ACAD-LAN.LAKEHEADU.CA
Subject:      Re: TOKENRPL Problem

In article <NOVELL%92081818482833@SUVM.SYR.EDU> you write:
>Path: thunder!torn!utcsri!rutgers!jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu
   !auvm!UCLAMVS.BITNET!IAZTEEC
>From: IAZTEEC@UCLAMVS.BITNET (Eric E. Chang)
>Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
>Subject: TOKENRPL Problem
>Message-ID: <NOVELL%92081818482833@SUVM.SYR.EDU>
>Date: 18 Aug 1992 22:36:00 GMT
>Sender: NOVELERR@SUVM.SYR.EDU
>Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
>Lines: 52
>Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

>A question for users of tokenrpl and net$dos.sys...

>I am running Netware 3.11 on an IBM Token Ring and would like to
>make a Dell 486P/33 remotely reset.  We have the requisite IBM
>prom on the TRA Board and have also done whatever the little red
>books say to do. We've loaded TOKENRPL and binded it to IPX,
>and I've set up a bootable floppy disk with the following files:

>DXMAMOD.SYS    4736    10/17/92  From IBM Lan Support Program 1.22
>DXMCMOD.SYS   19456    06/21/90
>IPX.COM       25651    08/18/92  Version 3.10
>NETX.COM      52443    03/10/92
>COMMAND.COM   47845    07/16/92


>The CONFIG.SYS contains:

>     FILES=30
>     buffers=30
>     device=DXMA0MOD.SYS 001
>     device=DXMC0MOD.SYS


>The AUTOEXEC.BAT contains:

>     IPX
>     NETX


>I ran the requisite DOSGEN, RPLFIX, and changed the flags on
>NET$DOS.SYS to sharable.

>Now when I start the workstation everything seems to run right:
>the Boot Prom does its thing without error codes, the Novell
>Remote Program Loader seems to work fine, and IPX appears to run
>properly. NETX seems to run ok and gives the following message:

>Netware V3.26 Workstation Shell (920221)
>(c)Copyright 1991 Novell, Inc. All Rights Reserved
>Running on DOS 5.00
>Attached to Server 11A13
>08-17-92 11:36:26 AM

>Then the machine hangs.  No prompt, no error, just the dead
>flashing cursor.  I am not so nieve that I would expect the
>documentation to be correct (after all, Novell's documentation
>is so complete), but does anyone know what I could be doing
>wrong?

>Thanks in advance,
>Eric Chang
>UCLA School of Social Welfare

I seem to be getting the same thing with NetWare 2.2.  I might be an error
on the DOS side.  Are you using MS-DOS or IBM DOS.  Our school was using IBM
DOS.  If you've solved the problem can you inform me to what you did.  It
was my assignment to get the whole thing working, among other things.  Thanx
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mailer: Elm [revision: 66.25]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 13:01:32 CDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Charles Hofstaedter <charlesh@STEDWARDS.EDU>
Subject: Re: HELP! Weird Netware PROBLEM!!!!!

When I have seen this problem, it was with the extender box.  This is only
applicable to an IBM PC baseband network and NW2.15c.

Something similar may be happening if you are using a distribution panel.
One or more ports go flaky and the initial connection is dropped rather
than getting error receiving from network retry? prompt.  By moving the
effected ws to different ports on your panel or extender, you may be able
to narrow down the scope.

I have no experience with sniffers and can not offer any suggestions there.
Hope this helps.
--
Charles Hofstaedter
Computer System/Network Administrator
St. Edward's University
3001 S. Congress Ave.
Austin, TX 78704
(512)448-8674
Internet Address: charlesh@acad.stedwards.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 27 Aug 1992 08:23:41 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Janene Carey <Janene.Carey@METZ.UNE.EDU.AU>
Subject:      Help!Arcserve can't login to non-host servers
X-To:         NOVELL@suvm.acs.syr.EDU
              92 9:49 pm

Hi!

Anyone else had problems with Arcserve not connecting to non-host servers
to do backups? I've just installed it, and am finding that it only works
for a server other than the host if you are attached to that server. And
it won't work at all in unattended mode.

In unattended mode the error message is "Failed to login to nw-ccen-1
as supervisor - No such file or directory,5  Check fileserver, login
id and password".
- we are all on the same network (same network number)
- it is not an error in typing names or passwords!

In attended mode, if you are not attached to the target server you
cannot even edit the form to submit the job, as it says that the
servername/path  is invalid. Pressing <insert> shows only the local
host and it's floppy drives. If you do attach to the target server
before running arcserve admin then you can backup the server in this
way, volume by volume.

We have an EISA 486, 16Mg RAM, Netware 3.11, Adaptec 1740 in standard
mode, HP35470A 2Gb Dat drive, Arcserve 4.0. We use ethernet 802.3
and I have tried lots of shells on the workstation submitting the
jobs (pdipx, ipxodi and straight ipx) in case that was relevant, to
no avail.

Any clues?
--
___________________________________________________________________

Janene Carey                          Applications Programmer
Computer Centre                       (067) 73 2287
UNE Armidale                          janene@metz.une.edu.au
Australia
___________________________________________________________________
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 27 Aug 1992 11:07:00 ADT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         RWILSON@HUSKY1.STMARYS.CA
Subject:      lab pcs 386 - 486 what to buy

John
        we have 50 XTs on eternet that still do WordPerfect. Not well
or fast but no one can out type the system. Therse are old
or fast but no one can out type the system. Therse are old (typo) and
the new pcs are real 386 with 4 meg of memory. They do wondows too.
One meg VGA colour gives a great presentation.  We will keep the
old XTs around untill they will no longer do word processing. The new
PCs will be back far enough from the leading edge to be safe. That means
will work welland will not bankrupt the budget. 386 486 586 are just
numbers when they get too big somebody wil introduce #1 again!

You do need to have powserfull PCs to do Windows, and CAD some stats
problems. The demand should come from the users. I didnot and would not
consider a 386sx for new labs. 4meg minimum memory with apotential to go
to 8 easily.

randy           rwilson@husky1.stmarys.ca
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Posted-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 92 23:18 EST
X-Vers: CCMail to SMTP translator by Alan Marshall vers 2.68 8/31/92
Organization: Proteon, Inc., Westborough, MA  01581  [(508)898-2800]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 21:59:00 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Fund@RELAY.PROTEON.COM
Subject:      Re: Netware Lite latest version
X-To:         Novell@suvm.acs.syr.edu

>I am intersted in setting up a small peer to peer lan with Netware light
>and Thought I had seen the version 1.2 listed on this group.
>The vendor tells me ver1.1 is the latest. Can anyone validate this.
>Thanks Michael Lager

   I just got two copies of Lite 1.1 from Novell today.

     Glenn Fund                           Internet:   Fund@Relay.proteon.com
     Principal Research Specialist        CompuServe: 75170,1060
     Lockheed Sanders                     cc:Mail     Fund at Proteonwebo
     DW Highway South                     Phone:      (603) 885-6242
     MS NHQ4-0405                         President of The Greater Boston Area
     Nashua, NH  03061                    Novell Users Group.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: JRD
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 25 Aug 1992 11:51:45 -0600
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Joe Doupnik <JRD@USU.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Kermit tcpip, ODI and the DNS

>A question for Kermit tcp/ip users:
>
>I am trying to use the Kermit's tcp/ip and the Domain Name Service with
>ODIPKT.COM and the other ODI stuff. Everything BUT the DNS lookup works
>fine: I can telnet out as long as I set the IP address explicitly. I have
>used NCSA Telnet in this configuration, and its DNS works fine. I have also
>used Kermit's DNS capability with a normal packet driver. It's only
>ODI and ODIPKT that seem to be a problem. The particulars:
>
>LSL 1.00
>SMCPLUS 2.10
>IPXODI  1.00
>NET5    3.10
>ODIPKT  1.1
>Kermit  3.11 patch 0
>
>The error message is that it can't connect to the nameservers - I've given
>it a primary and secondary. But I can log into them via Kermit's telnet if
>I use the same address(es) explicitly. I'm pretty sure my configuration
>parameters are all set up properly. And I *know* the servers are good. Does
>anyone have any experience/ideas? Am I using out-of-date versions? Any help
>or suggestions appreciated.
>
>Gerry Oxford  <oxford@flis.utoronto.ca>
---------------
        Without some additional information I can't speculate much. Subnet
masking is the typical problem. May I recommend upgrading to MSK v3.12 beta
which has native mode ODI support and discarding ODIPKT unless it is needed
for other applications? Performance will be Much Better & no shim is needed.
While improving things try more modern shell components too: file DOSUP5.ZIP
from ftp.is.sandy.novell.com (or mirrors), cd novlib\01. Use NETX in preference
to NET<digit> to simplify life locally. MSK 3.12 beta is available most
easily from my NW 3.11 file server netlab2.usu.edu, cd kermit; novlib is
there too.
        For what it's worth dept: I now normally run Kermit over ODI and am
very pleased with the results. But then I have some biases!
        Oh, I do have two ideas on the nameserver stuff. If you have multiple
gateways on the network, such as several cisco boxes on the same backbone
wire, then the targeted gateway may "redirect" traffic to another for
forwarding. This occurs with a IP ICMP Redirect packet. MSK v3.11 did not
know what to do with that, but MSK 3.12 does. The other thought here is
that ODIPKT v1.1 tends to drop a lot of packets at my place and that will
hamper nameserver probes (they are UDP msgs, datagrams). Kermit over ODI
does not suffer from dropped packets. (Grab file msr312.upd to see how to
use ODI with Kermit's Telnet).
        Joe D.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 11:51:14 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "(J. Pilant)" <pilant@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      re: disabling printscreen
X-To:         NOVELL%SUVM@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU

check out the simtel files.  I know there is one (or more) there.  If you
still cannot find one, I wrote one ages age, and I can send it to you.

/jeff
Xref: sparky bit.listserv.novell:12965 comp.sys.novell:6707
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Sunday, 23 Aug 1992 21:43:31 CDT
From: Satish Movva <U37127@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell,comp.dcom.lans.novell,comp.sys.novell
Subject: RIPL over an 802.3 only path..

Hello,
  I am having problems remote booting a PC from a Novell 3.11 server.
  It works fine when both the server and the PC are on the same
  ethernet segment.  However if we hook up the PC across a David SNMP'able
  HUB and a fiber transceiver, the PC just reports an ERROR CONNECTING TO
  SERVER message.  Our datacom people think that the problem may be that
  the HUB or the transceiver is only passing 802.3 packets and not 802.2.
  The remote boot process initially uses 802.2 packets and the ETHERRPL.NLM
  is bound to a 802.2 stack on the server.
  My questions are,
    Have any of you heard of or experienced this problem?
    Can the 802.3 only transceiver or hubs be the problem?
    Can the RIPL process use 802.3 packets rather than the default 802.2?

  Any assistance you can provide will be greatfully appreciated and
  first borns named after you...
  :-)
Thanks,


Satish Movva                                 Bitnet: U37127@UICVM
Academic Computer Center                   Internet: u37127@uicvm.uic.edu
University of Illinois at Chicago                    satish@satish.cc.uic.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 26 Aug 1992 10:36:54 PDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Richard Warner <rick@SJSUMCS.SJSU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: SFT III (WISH-WARE).
X-To:         NOVELL%SUVM.BITNET@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
              IRM, The Citadel" at Aug 26, 92 12:01 pm

> >PC Week (U.K. edition) had an article some months ago about a test of SFT III
> >at a British site; however, all that was meant by `SFT III' on this occasion
> >was dual processor mirroring - two CPUs in the one machine, each running NLMs
> >etc, dividing the load between them and the secondary taking over from the
> >primary in the event of its failure. I think it was done in a Compaq. This
> >might be nice for some but it's not what I believed Level III would be.
> >Where are the `mirrored servers' we were promised so very long ago?
>
> >Tony Sheehan
> >grg1678@v2.qub.ac.uk
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> That question is easy.  As soon as the new version of NW "4.0"? (sorry I've
> lost track), comes out.  You can then upgrade your current version if you
> believe the cost/benefits are worth it.  Novell has apparently reneged on its
> "promise" to make SFT III available for NW 3.XX.  I wonder if these guys will
> become more flexible in the future once Microsoft starts shipping Windows NT.
> Market share is not forever.

First, do not be so sure of the 'no 3.11' position.  Second, Novell's
competitors have been worse in this regard than Novell.  Take Banyan;
Windows and OS/2 are supported on Versions 4.10 of VINES - nothing
before that (4.10 became usable a year ago - Aug. 8 1991).  Windows 3.1
is supported only on VINES 4.11 and above.  OS/2 2.0 likewise.  There is
no backward or downward compatibility in the VINES world - it is upgrade
or else.

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         Bill Lakner                     laknerb@citadel.edu
>         Network Support                 laknerb@citadel.bitnet
>         The Citadel, Charleston, SC
>

+-----------------------+-------------------------------------+
|   Richard M. Warner   |   Internet:  rick@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu  |
|                       | CompuServe:  71121,2257             |
+-----------------------+-------------------------------------+
|  ** DISCLAIMER:  All opinions are strictly my own.  I work  |
|                  hard enough at forming them!               |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: Novell@SUVM.BITNET
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.2 (R3).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 15:22:49 MET
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         NOVELL@WAGA01.HRO.NL
Subject:      ROUTER.NLM

I have Novell 3.11 with several WS.
Some WS has the new radio-frequentie Network adapters.
But when we want to use them we need a ROUTER, but the routers we
know are only for a dedicated WS.
I wonder of there is a ROUTER.NLM so we can use them  on the
Fileserver.

Has anyone heard about it

Thanks

Jan Groenendijk
Hogeschool Rotterdam (Holland)
Adres J.Groenendijk@WAG.HRO.NL
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 13:57:00 LCL
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "(Dave Kearns)" <DKEARNS.TCC@KLAVEN.TCI.COM>
Subject:      Re: changing the block size of a volume
X-To:         "(NOVELL)" <NOVELL@suvm.acs.syr.edu>

>  This might be a silly question, but here it is anyway.  I have a file
>server with a 16k block size on a volume.  I think that it is causing me
>to lose some disk space (because there are a lot of small files) I would
>like to back it down to 4 or 8 k block sizes.  Do I have to backup
>the volume and restore it?  Or is there a way to simply change the
>block size down from 16k?

Changing the block size will wipeout everything on the drive. Be doubly
sure you have good backups (as well as your installation disks!)

-dave
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.1c R5.
X-Pmrqc:  1
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 27 Aug 1992 08:21:24 PST
Reply-To:     bob@voltaire.ucsb.edu
From:         Bob Garcia <bob@VOLTAIRE.UCSB.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Server Memory over 16MB

> We have hit a problem with Memory in our File servers - we've filled up our
> 16M quota and we still need more RAM (for our Oracle 6 server).  We can't
> afford a new EISA file server to do the job, so are there any other
> options.  The machine is a ISA based 486, with an RM Ethernet card and a
> Adaptec 1540 SCSI controller.
>
> I have heard rumours about 16Mb add on cards (on the ISA bus), but I'm not
> sure if Netware can use the memory and if it can is will the Oracle NLMs
> use it?
>
> Another possibility is that one of new ISA based PCs could be used since it
> will take 32Mb on the main board.  But will this hit similar problems.
>
> Thanks for any help


Paul:
  We have the same basic configuration ( adaptec controller, ISA 486
33mhz, and Oracle)  Our server currently has 32mb of memory,
Both Oracle and Netware can use all this memory.
We did have a problem with the 1540, however.  You need to be running
the latest version of Adaptec's software.  The earlier versions
didn't like anything over 16mbs and would cause the server to crash.
Hope this helps

*-----------------------------------------*
*    Bob Garcia, Programmer/Analyst       *
*  Letters & Science Computing Services   *
* University of California, Santa Barbara *
*        (bob@voltaire.ucsb.edu)          *
*-----------------------------------------*
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 1 Sep 1992 15:06:26 +1000
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Byron Newton <eq01893@QLD.TNE.OZ.AU>
Subject:      Re: multiple servers

In bit.listserv.novell you write:

>What is the "best"way of implementing multiple servers?  I have about 400 users
>who want to use the same apps.  Is it better to duplicate apps on each server
>or have everyone attach to one server.  This seems like it would get a bit
 hairy
>trying to keep accounts straight (which server gets the users home account).
>A related question is Can redundancy be built into the two servers so if one
>goes down the other will be able to provide some or all services.

Well 3.11 only handles 250 users at once, you could attach map the drive and
 logout of the attached server for various apps eg
attache server/wp
map ins s1:=server:wp
wp
logout server
where wp is a user account for wordperfect.
This solution would only hold up connects while the user was using the
 individual apps.

As for server redundancy thats the promise of sft III due sometine in 1993

You may want to look at Lan Shadow or Arc servee has an option for creating a
 shadow of a netware drive.

Hope this helps
  Byron Newton


><- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->
>  Duane Kerstetter
>  System Administrator
>  CAE-Link
>  Binghamton, NY
>  u2d65@lfkw2.bgm.link.com
><- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ->
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: JRD
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 1 Sep 1992 16:11:19 -0600
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Joe Doupnik <JRD@USU.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: ODI drivers

>>Many messages about ODI drivers are sent. I tried to write a ODI driver
>>for an network adapter. but I could not! ODI drivers are written by the
>>network adapter vendors. You have to know much about ODI specification.
>>Novell has a package to write ODI drivers for adapters. But it is not
>>free. It's price more or less $7,500. It is called IMDP (Independent
>>Manufacturers Development Program). No source available on nets about ODI.
>>Novell has another program call PDP (Professional Developers Program).
>>It's aim is to write programs for protocol stacks. And suprisingly it is
>>free.
>>So looking for a driver source is meaningless. A student can not by IMDP.
>>Sincerely,
>
>********************* NOTES from Dave Kearns (DKEARNS @ TCC) at 9/1/92 1:06p
>
>Actually, its IMSP (not IMDP). While the Professional Developers Program
>(PDP) carries no membership charge, it is necessary to have purchased the
>current version of one of the development packages (C lib, C for NLMs,
>Windows SDK, etc.).
>
>I do believe that Brian Meek (Brian@Novell.com) said that he had placed
>the ODI spec on his FTP server (sjf-lwp.novell.com). Just tried to verify
>this, and FTP tels me its now an "unknown host", so the name may have
>changed. Unfortunately I don't have the address. Hopefully Brian (or
>someone else) can jump in here and confirm/deny this.
>
>-dave
--------------
        The ODI spec docs are on sjf-lwp.corp.sjf.novell.com (the new name)
and on netlab2.usu.edu (cd misc). The files are ODI_*.ZIP and PSTACK_*.ZIP,
they are large, and they are all Postscript material. ODI_* is the bottom
part of things for board driver writers and PSTACK_* is the protocol stack
applications level material (the LSL, as expected, lives in the middle).
Be prepared to run the printer for a day or so if doing all the manuals.
        Joe D.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU