From: longn@lauto.lmc.com (Long Nguyen)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Subject: [MISC]  Hey Troops.  Desert Storm Is Over!
Date: 19 Aug 92 06:50:00 GMT
Reply-To: lauto!longn@sequent.com




Hey troops,


Desert Storm is over.  Sadam Hussein (DDK in Edinburgh) has been 
forced out of SCV.  Let's stop all fightings and find a cease fire
date.  Say Thursday evening?  

Israel & Arab both have been fallen into the trap desperately & cheaply 
sprung by Iraq.  Meanwhile Kuwait was also attacked by Arab for being 
allying with US against Iraq.  (Longan played dual role:  Kuwait & US).

Now, let's revisit the reason for Sadam Hussein getting the boot:  
Operating on courtesy, SCV netters exchange news, knowledge, jokes, 
friendship, poems.  We don't need and even disgust at personal 
information revealed by immature netters.

It was Sadam Hussein blatantly showing off & performing self-advertising 
for his own selfish motive.  His posts had no value to SCV but clobbering 
the net.  SCV don't need that kind of netters who also irresponsibly 
sended personal 'addressing' mail which resulted the halt of DANANG 
posting series.  WE DON'T NEED/WANT DDK'S OPINION NOR CENSORSHIP!

About the evil Soviet empire (Chris Chu@ATT), Iraq's weapon supplier: 
This netter has been annoying time and time for thriving on personal 
information.  He was not as blatant or offensive as his client Sadam 
Hussein because he knew how to meow like a cat "Meeoow meeoow, dduo^i anh 
daaaaa....ai` qua'".  But he's also mean and vicious. 

>In this response to your public post as forwarded below, I want to tell
>you that I have certainly known many people like you while playing in a
>band around Denver and while helping A&TT Bell Labs recruit at UCD five
 ^^^^ CHEAP SHOW-OFF          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>years ago. I thank you for your offer but I really have no wish to get
                                 "Cafeteria", "Pick up any chics"
>together with you because of your immaturity and, sorry to say, stupidity.
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^ How nice of Chris! ^^^^^^^^^

I ask Chris Chu to shut up and stay away from my logic postings because he's 
made a fatal slip in logic terminology.

>  A => B is always true if A is false; this is NOT OBVIOUSLY INTUITIVE to
       Not true but ^^^^ Valid here.  
Back in college, my logic (phylosophy 101) teacher would give a death sentence 
to any student making this slip in logic.  In my opinion, this mistake is more
humiliating than Dan Quale misspelled 'potato' with and ending 'e'.

In short, valid/validity is for arguement & true/truth is for fact.

Chris Chu is welcomed to dig up books and assist my logic teaching but he
doesn't quite have the fundametal understanding of logic to give an opinion.
And please don't show off with fancy truth tables.  So, GET LOST Chris.

This netter has revealed his and others' personal informations serveral times
in the last 4 months but I have chosen to overlook and stay out of his way:
     1.  Let's the one without sin cast the first stone.
     2.  I am not afraid but wanted no war at all.  (Then TX spoiled it!)
     3.  He's an ok netter if his showing off could be overlooked.
Now he's more stinky than usual that I have to cast stones to ward him off.

I HATE THE ABUSE PERSONAL INFORMATION.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

About my series of logic teaching, please don't think that I am showing off.
In this world, life have many facets and follows the opportunity-cost law.  Let
me humbly admit that I don't know how to write poem, sing...  I have deficiency
knowledge about Vietnam War 1945-75.  There are many other things that I don't 
know but others do.  That's the whole point of exchange information.

In my belief, logic is very essential in the beginning foundation of wisdom.
And it is very simple and easy for everyone to grasp.  One can fare very far
by examining this simple exchange between two Americans (repost of LOGIC 101).

>   All murderers have human form
>   You have human form
>
>   You must be a murderer

No offense intended, Tom, but this logic is flawed.  
A -> B
A
therefore B is correct, or
A -> B
NOT B
therefore NOT A

(All murderers have human form.
You are a murderer, therefore you have human form.
or 
All murderers have human form.
You do not have human form, therefore you are not a murderer...)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Longan - USA with SDI & patriot missiles.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese