HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JOSEPH ALOYSIUS MCVEIGH)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Nightline and Presidential Cantidates
Date: 24 Nov 92 01:28:21 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

AWLEY@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (Kif Cawley) writes:

>    Certainly have to agree with David on this. Mayhaps the 6% to 10%
>of those people that control the "old money" (read wealth) are not in
>a "recession".The 90% negative economic writing just means the rest of
>us are writing I suppose! Try the Northeast for a while and see what
>sort of "rosy" clime there is here for employment!!


Employment is not the criterion for economic status categorizing. GNP growth
is. The USA has had six consecutive quarters of growth. The categorization is
not two-tiered based on income level.

Employment cutbacks make news because they're (a) sensational news and (b)
done en masse. Hirings are less dramatic and are done in smaller lots. Most
job creation is done by non-Fortune-500 firms. Now, which makes better copy?

"GM announces plant closing/2000 idled"

or a bunch of two-liners like
"Arcane Software Inc. hires twelve in product development"

Negative reporting is easier and flashier, and not just economic/financial
reporting.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Aloysius McVeigh |"The world is full of articulate people who may not
   jm0i@.Lehigh.edu     | know too much, but are nonetheless perfectly willing
      "N.I.N.A."        | to make policy."                 - Philip R. Lochner
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: What do you Am men think about Am wome
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 00:42:50 GMT

In article <JULIE.92Nov18210236@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu> julie@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu (Julie Wright) writes:
>huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston) writes:
>
>>tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>>>In article <d+hqdlg@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
>>>>Personally, I believe that sexual duration is a valuable asset. :)
>
>>>[comments on women's attitudes about short duration] 
>>>(Of course this observation
>>>is coming from someone who has traditionally had the opposite problem, so it
>>>may be a bit skewed.)
>
>>Here are some numbers.  The average duration of human copulation is about
>>four minutes.  
>
>I have this image of some guy standing discreetly in the corner of the
>bedroom with a clipboard and stopwatch.  "Pay no attention to the man
>behind the curtain, dear."

Nah--there's no reason to make things that complicated; all you have to
do is notice the time counter when you play back the videotapes. 

>>Among mammals, though, the record-holder is some rodent at twelve hours!
>
>So Trygve, are you a man or a mouse?

Well, m'dear, I've never found a partner who would put up with a single
sexual act for twelve hours a a stretch.  (Though, it should be pointed
out that finding someone willing to spend twelve hours engaged in a
variety of sexual activities (as long as an ample supply of water and
a well-stocked hors d'oeuvres tray is within reach) is not particularly
hard to find.)  It's too bad, too, since I've always wondered whether
I could achieve three climaxes in one act.

Trygve   (Though now that I've developed enough control that I can
          regularly climax in less than an hour, this may not be
          nearly as difficult as it would have been a few years ago.) 
Xref: sparky soc.singles:30962 alt.pagan:12946 alt.romance:14156 alt.sex:36455 alt.polyamory:1807
From: rstevew@deeptht.armory.com (Richard Steven Walz)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.pagan,alt.romance,alt.sex,alt.polyamory
Subject: Re: raising children
Date: 15 Nov 92 08:12:53 GMT
Organization: The Armory

In article <1dv474INNn3@manuel.anu.edu.au> Lubosh.Hanuska@anu.edu.au (Lubosh) writes:
>In article <BxK3E2.Gv1@access.digex.com> Corun MacAnndra,
>corun@access.digex.com writes:
>>I'd be interested to see an experiment conducted, where two groups of
>>children, both male and female, are raised in households, one of all
>>men, and one of all women. A fair mix would include gays as well as
>>straights on the parent side, in order to give the children as well
>>rounded a set of experiences as possible.
>Okay, but I think little kids are too precious gifts of God to be used
>for experiments.
>Lubosh
------------------
That data has already been done and collected the natural way.
Children come out about 10% gay and 20 or 25% bisexual and the rest
more or less heterosexual regardless of the parents' sexuality. There
is simply no discernable difference. It's almost like a child decides
before birth which it will be, or like it is a genetic or neurological
predisposition.
- Steve

-- 
* Richard STEVEn Walz   rstevew@deeptht.armory.com   (408) 429-1200  *
* 515 Maple Street #1   * Without safe and free abortion women are   *
* Santa Cruz, CA 95060    organ-surrogates to unwanted parasites.*   *
* Real Men would never accept organ-slavery and will protect Women.  *
From: smith@wesson.Eng.Sun.COM (Nina S. Smith - SunSoft Product Marketing)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Smiths & Joneses
Date: 20 Nov 1992 00:44:08 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems
Distribution: world
Reply-To: smith@wesson.Eng.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: wesson

In article 15556@auspex-gw.auspex.com, johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.190225.14601@sol.UVic.CA> atovorni@engr.UVic.CA writes:
> 

>|"Smith" and "Jones" appear to be names as common as they are portrayed in 
>|many stereotypes...These names are also portrayed in such a way as to invoke
>|images of averageness or dullness.
> 
>You haven't met Nina, I guess.

Why John . . . what *are* you trying to say???

>|To all the Smiths and Joneses in my files:
>|
>|Thank you for destroying a stereotype and killing some myths about your
>|last names...At least in my imagination.
>
>We'll, maybe you have.

No he hasn't . . . the poor sod!!! :)

>-- 
>+==========================================================================+
>| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
>| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
>+==========================================================================+

-- Nina
Organization: Queen's University at Kingston
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:54:03 EST
From: Graydon <SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA>
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Top 9 things...
 <31538@hydra.Helsinki.FI>

"Not even with blood tests."

"Not even double dipped in latex."

"But I couldn't be seen with a geek."

You? .. proceeds to fold up in midle and roll on floor laughing, with,
oh, 50 witnesses present.  (Happened to me in Grade 13, unlike the
first three).

Graydon
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (dreas)
Subject: Re: Top 9 things...
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 23:44:36 GMT

In article 31538@hydra.Helsinki.FI, taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina) writes:
>In <Nov.17.13.40.03.1992.27111@romulus.rutgers.edu> nehs@romulus.rutgers.edu (-Killer Klondike-) writes:
>>More things are always welcome.  E-mail is fine too.
>
>"You?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..."
>
>"I don't want to date you,  you must be carrying dozens of     veneral
>diseases, and I bet that you would drool on my breasts too"    ^^^^^^^
>(Sorry, I don't remember who mentioned this first)

"veneral" diseases?
Oh, you must have meant "venerable" diseases like Alzheimer's.

Pardon my poor Finish! :+)

dreas




Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tyger@netcom.com (Kristen Kohlbecker)
Subject: Re: PRES DEBATE
Organization:  I'm part of a massive Blonde Conspiracy
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:37:07 GMT

dks@srhqla.UUCP (Dave K. Sprow) writes:
>In article <1992Nov11.184030.15406@netcom.com> tyger@netcom.com (Kristen Kohlbecker) writes:
>>larry@b8.b8.ingr.com (Larry Billings) writes:
>>>aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>>>> 
>>>> Because Mr. Baker, as former President Bush himself put it, would be
>>>He is NOT former President Bush until mid Janurary.
>>Larry,  it's over. We lost. It's time to regroup and look to 94 and 96.
>>
>Tyger, that's what I said to you the other day. Haven't heard a peep
>from you since.  You talking to me ?  Like I said, it's only politics.
>It's OK if we disagree on it. Right?

Absolutely...I'd be rather worried if everyone agreed with me...;) As for not
haring a peep out of me, I answered your mail ages ago! Did you not get it?

>But as long as we're on the subject :-) , I hope CLinton does a good job.
>I think there's a better than average chance he will.  If he doesn't,
>I'll be voting for some one else next time (if I'm still here).  At least
>I agree with most of Clinton's issue positions.  Now, lets see how well
>(or not) he implements them.  That's at least as important as where he
>stands on the issue itself.  He knows he can't make any drastic budget
>deficit moves without sending the economy into (prob) worse shape than
>it's been.  Regardless, of Rpub. or Dem., or who's to blame, it's still
>makes me ill that 1/3rd (I believe) of all our taxes just goes to
>paying hte *interest* on the deficit.  Just think if we had all that money
>to *do( something with!!

He damn well better do a good job...after all we're stuck with him and his
people for 4 years.

>David
>
>PS Don't let Steven get under your skin.  Mostly, I think he's just
>trying to get a rise out of you.  I don't *think* he was being
>serious.

Steve is a bicycle seat sniffer, and if he has problems with me e-slapping
him for sticking his nose in where it has no business, that's just too 
bad.

>take care,

Indeed...looking forward to seeing you in 3 weeks...:)

Tyger


-- 
      Kristen Kohlbecker    And I would choose to be with you
      tyger@netcom.com      That's if the choice were mine to make   
                            But you can make decisions too
      A Tyger and a Lady    And you can have this heart to break
From: dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Are you a Young Transplant?
Date: 23 Nov 1992 17:30:46 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

In article <MARTINC.92Nov22234509@hatteras.cs.unc.edu>, martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
> In article <1992Nov23.040857.1938@netcom.com> rohwerwd@netcom.com (W. David Rohwer) writes:
> 
>    In article <MARTINC.92Nov18123935@hatteras.cs.unc.edu> martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>    >
>    >I still can't figure out why it is that Dawn, who is a small cute
>    >brunette with a nice smile, gets results this way, while *I* -- looking 
>    >rather like Bluto, with a black belt, a decent knife thrower and an
>    >expert shot with a pistol -- get *laughs* when I threaten violence.
>    >--

Or another theory is that people here have figured out just how full
of shit I am and are just playing along with me for chuckles.

Dawn

Joseph Campbell gave me hope and now I have been saved.
"Folk Song" by Bongwater
From: aaron@minster.york.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: What is "NOT" attractive to women?
Date: 23 Nov 92 11:14:23 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of York, England

In article <1992Nov18.233309.29815@cbfsb.cb.att.com> sms@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (steven.m.stein) writes:
:
:But I'm sure there are a few common denominators as far as what women
:DON'T find attractive:
:
:4)  Nails not longer than hers (fingers and toes)
:

  If it really upset a woman so much then I doubt I would find them 
  attractive so there wouldn't be a problem.

  (I play bass and guitar so half of my nails tend to be longer, half not
   which would probably makes me look like a BizzareMutantFromThePlanetZog 
   did I not bear a passing resemblance to Art Garfunkel)

		Aaron		aaron@minster.york.ac.uk

   P.S.

	Do any women out there have any comments on the attractiveness
        or otherwise of Art Garfunkel look alikes? (I need to know).
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: What is attractive to women?
Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 12:53:56 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.204331.17994@bnlux1.bnl.gov> schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:
>
>Try wearing your "Cure" t-shirt to work some time with the
>worn-through-at-the-knees blue jeans and see how long you stay at your
>RealWorld job, assuming that they hire you in the first place.
>Sometimes you have to play by the rules during the day for appearances,
>also if you wish to command any kind of respect from your older
>co-workers who are busy talking about the state of property taxes and
>prime lending rates.  Being a young professional that works with older
>folks means that you can't do just whatever you want to do all of the
>time.  Wearing a tie dosen't necessarily make you a ... oh MY
>GOD!..."conformist"!

Heh.  Whiner.  Find another job.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only
specification is that it should run noiselessly.
From: pooh@Apple.COM (Wendy Nather)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: What is attractive to women?
Date: 17 Nov 92 08:11:39 GMT
Organization: Internet Refugee Camp


Re: suits and ties:

I'd rather see a man who can wear anything with style rather
than someone who is trying desperately not to Conform To
the Bad Guys and is therefore wearing the standard issue
P.C. jeans-and-t-shirt (optional black leather jacket).
A *real* nonconformist wears whatever he damn well pleases,
whether it be Bermuda shorts or a tuxedo.

Remember: everyone in this room is wearing a uniform, and
don't kid yourselves.  (F. Zappa)

Pooh
	pooh@apple.com

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: sms@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (steven.m.stein)
Subject: Re: What is "NOT" attractive to women?
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 23:33:09 GMT


There are probably as many variables as there are women.

But I'm sure there are a few common denominators as far as what women
DON'T find attractive:

1)  Teeth preferably not green
2)  No fleas or other creepy crawlers in hair
3)  Hair not so greasy that even the fleas keep slipping off
4)  Nails not longer than hers (fingers and toes)
5)  Scars from sex change operation (scars from appendix, war wound,
    heart surgery probably acceptable, and probably preferrable by some)
6)  Skin softer than hers
7)  Breasts larger than hers
8)  Buldge in pants smaller than hers
9)  Past history of violence toward women (B I G negative)
10)  Uncontrollable urge to touch and fondle every woman your eyes 
     happen to fall upon
11)  Uncontrollable urge to touch yourself 
12)  Uncontrollable urge to touch her (everything in moderation)
13)  Having a body scent not only a mother would tolerate
14)  Not wearing clothes rejected by the Salvation Army

				Steve
From: martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: PRES DEBATE
Date: 15 Nov 92 23:43:15 GMT
	<1992Nov9.010922.11400@netcom.com>
	<1992Nov11.062227.8133@oracle.us.oracle.com>
	<BxKu13.20q@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
	<MARTINC.92Nov12104327@hatteras.cs.unc.edu>
	<thurlow.721725195@c
Distribution: usa
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: thurlow@convex.com's message of 14 Nov 92 07:13:15 GMT

In article <thurlow.721725195@convex.convex.com> thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:


   In <MARTINC.92Nov12104327@hatteras.cs.unc.edu> martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

   >I'm no friend of Robertson or Buchanan, but to be fair the Democrats
   >haven't thrown out Wellstone or ... oh hell, that guy Jane Fonda used to
   >be married to.

   They sure stopped Jesse Jackson from taking over the agenda at the
   convention this year.  It seems like the equivalent is the least we
   could have expected from an incumbent.

Stupidity is its own reward.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
Subject: Re: Description of the Fetal Remains from an Abortion
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 08:18:40 GMT
Distribution: na
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.15 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In <1992Nov18.182144.19015@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.173151.4801@ncsu.edu> dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu ( ) writes:
>>   a sack of blood and globs of tissue
>
>You know dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu that was beautiful also. I think it would be
>a little more appropriate and make more of an impact on
>alt.romance.chat. Hey, it's a suggestion.

Wouldn't rec.food.cooking be more appropriate?  :-)

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
Xref: sparky soc.singles:31177 soc.bi:15302 alt.polyamory:1824 talk.religion.misc:21425
From: dsg@impmh.uucp (Dave Gordon)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.bi,alt.polyamory,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: raising children
Date: 18 Nov 92 18:23:57 GMT
Organization: Integrated Micro Products Ltd

In <16NOV199214485252@apsicc.aps.edu> jim@apsicc.aps.edu (frost...) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.062327.3208@netcom.com>, rohwerwd@netcom.com (W. David Rohwer) writes...
>>In article <1dv474INNn3@manuel.anu.edu.au> Lubosh <Lubosh.Hanuska@anu.edu.au> writes:
>>>In article <BxK3E2.Gv1@access.digex.com> Corun MacAnndra,
>>>corun@access.digex.com writes:
>>>>I'd be interested to see an experiment conducted, where two groups of
>>>>children, both male and female, are raised in households, one of all
>>>>men, and one of all women. A fair mix would include gays as well as
>>>>straights on the parent side, in order to give the children as well
>>>>rounded a set of experiences as possible.
>>>
>>>Okay, but I think little kids are too precious gifts of God to be used
>>>for experiments.
>>>Lubosh
>> 
>>     You have to prove there is a God before you can say that little
>>kids or anything for that matter is a precious gift from God.
>	
>	I disagree with this statement. You don't have to prove that
>	there is a God to say that children are a rare gift indeed.

But you do to claim that they are "a precious gift from God."
						   ^^^^^^^^
Perhaps you didn't read what he actually said?

>	To take and corrupt a fresh childs mind is, or should be a crime.
                    ^^^^^^^
This is not what people were talking about!!!
Look back at Corun's description " ... in order to give the
children as well rounded a set of experiences as possible."

Is this "corruption"?  Sounds more like caring to me!

>>GIGO = Gospel In Garbage Out
>>-- 
>>       +----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>      /  Keep Abortion Legal and Safe.  Reduce the Deficit.            /
>>  +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> /   //  W. David Rohwer   // Amiga       UUCP: apple!netcom.com!rohwerwd |
>>|  \X/       Go A's!     \X/ 3000UX   Internet: rohwerwd@netcom.COM      /
>>+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

FIFO = Flamage In, Flamage Out

BTW, for a science-fictional account of a society which includes
many of Corun's suggestions, read _Triton_, by Samuel Delaney.
-- 

===============================================================================
Dave | dsg@imp.co.uk | +44 753 516599 | "C^i tio ne estas .subskribo"
===============================================================================
From: martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Description of the Fetal Remains from an Abortion
Date: 23 Nov 92 04:40:15 GMT
	<1992Nov21.210107.7915@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com>
	<1992Nov22.204329.10301@ncsu.edu>
	<MARTINC.92Nov22205408@hatteras.cs.unc.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu's message of 23 Nov 92 01:54:08 GMT

In article <MARTINC.92Nov22205408@hatteras.cs.unc.edu> martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

      They could put me in a killfile, and they wouldn't have to 
      read the description.  But it's the fact that other people
      can read the description which upsets them.

   No, asshole, it's the fact that *I* had to read the description before I
   *knew* you should be in my kill file that upsets me.

Since it appear to be an issue, I apologize for sullying the newsgroup
with the somewhat coarse word "asshole".
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Money and the Single World (was: Education and the Single World
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 22:53:38 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.145826.5722@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <1992Nov21.121447.29185@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>>In article <lgqe6pINNhs8@news.bbn.com> dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>>>
>>>Your sweetsie-pie persona is starting to slip, Tryg baby.  You only said
>>>this to be a shit and so you could see all the unworthies reading this 
>>>group whimper.
>>
>>Now would I do a thing like that?  (And who reading this group is unworthy?)
>
>James meekly raises hand. Gives a sick little cough and goes back to
>cowering.

Now, james, would I write an entire opera about you if you were unworthy?

Trygve   (I did too--I finally got around to writing the lyrics and everything.)

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: DeadHead@cup.portal.com (Bruce M Ong)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,ba.singles
Subject: Re: YKYBRNTLW.... (Re: Where to meet women?)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 16:04:47 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: na
  <BxuIII.LB8@CAM.ORG> <1992Nov17.134438.28042@netcom.com>

>In article <BxuIII.LB8@CAM.ORG> souchay@CAM.ORG (Francois Souchay) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov15.160054.7299@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dan
c
>ing Machine) writes:
>>>In article <BxqE3D.Kus@CAM.ORG> souchay@CAM.ORG (Francois Souchay) writes:
>>>>In article <1992Nov12.041104.8421@wetware.com> diana@wetware.com (CatWoman 
)
> writes:
>>>>>We ProblemOlderWomen can only get the title
>>>>>when we want sex MORE than our ProblemYoungerMen...
>>>>Hmmm.... Haven't dated many French Men , have we?  >:->
>>>I don't think you've met a *real* ProblemOlderWoman yet, have you?
>>No, why? Got some phone numbers? Heh heh heh.
>
>Sorry!  Gotta find your own!

	I dont think one has to *find* them.

>-- 
>                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
>                             @netcom.com 
>
>Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
>
>Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only
>specification is that it should run noiselessly.

--
/bruce			Whenas in silks my Julia goes,
			Then, then, methinks, how sweetly flows
deadhead		That liquefaction of her clothes.
@cup.portal.com		
			Next, when I cast mine eyes, and see
			That brave vibration, each way free,
			O, how that glittering taketh me!  -Robert Herrick,1648
Newsgroups: soc.singles