From: nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle)
Subject: Re: And YOU thought I was nuts! 
Keywords: Ingsoc. Humor-impaired.
Organization: Psych Department, Indiana University
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 20:13:23 GMT

chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu (Thoughtcrime Convict #12273-101) writes:
> If you are a humor-impaired liberal who can only laugh when stuff
>this ugly is said about Conservatives, bang the "n" key with your
>forehead now.

    Uh, Steve, I have a question. I don't normally laugh when stuff that 
ugly is said about Conservatives, but when it was said about *you* I 
found it funny as all get-out. Do I stay or do I go?

>(My folks are the kind of people I wish would one day lose their house
>to some wacko wetlands law, so they could see environmentalism
>up-close.)

    Nice thought.

> For those of you liberals who said I was nuts when I printed that
>huge, outrageous (and humor-intended) predictions for the Clinton
>years,

    Now wait one ding-dang minute. I never said you were nuts. Rude and 
overly melodramatic perhaps, but *not nuts*. I have the utmost respect 
for your mental composure.

> I said that personhood would be given to dolphins, trees and spotted
>owls (and probably whales) by the time Clinton leaves office. Well, in
>Malibu, CA, it seems that dolphins have already been declared citizens
>of the city.

    Hey, they don't have congressional seats yet.

> Not so outrageous anymore, huh, liberals? I never REALLY thought that
>could happen - I was just looking at you liberals in as humorous a
>light as YOU looked at us with your stupid jokes and predictions
>starting back when Carter lost the presidency, and which heightened
>with the Dan Quayle / Murphy Brown bit. But now, lo and behold, it HAS
>happened. Dolphins are now inching closer to legal personhood! They
>were declared citizens of Malibu, California!

    Well if you would just stop saying this stuff and giving us ideas 
then how would we know what the one thing was that we could do to give 
you the absolute maximum aggravation?

> You thought I was nuts? Nope. I'm factual.

    I know, and it's got me worried.

> We can always count on liberals trying to slander conservatives (and
>hurl names at folks like me) and try to deny the facts,

    Yeah, you can always count on us to hurl names at you.

>Liberals are too chicken to admit when someone else is pulling the same 
>trick they pulled a while before.

    Actually, *I'm* not to chicken to admit it. In fact, that's why we 
were hurling names at you (this time). 

>Liberals cannot stand humor leveled against them, even though they level 
>humor against conservatives, daily. 

    Sheesh, you make humor sound like an advanced weapon system or 
something.

>I mean, we see that every single day here on USENET.

    Amen, Brother Chaney. Amen.

> Now, for other things you can look forward to finding in the Clinton
>years..

> * The Sensitivity Police will become a new branch of law enforcement
>similar to the FBI.

    I can see why you'd be especially worried about that one.

> * Eating meat will become a crime in Washington, DC,

    As long as they can still suck blood, that's all that's important.

>                         Have a nice 4 years!

    I'll do that, Steve, thanks very much. Y'all have a nice 4 years too.

--
Nathan Engle                        Software Juggler
Psychology Department               Indiana University
nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu      nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh