From: bufalini@cattycorner.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Keywords: Tilden, incorrect
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 01:04:57 GMT

In article <1eb4g5INN5bu@venture.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>
>In article <1992Nov16.212937.11848@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, bbufalin@nyx.cs.du.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>>In article <1e8r85INN1oi@venture.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>>>In article <Bxo1vF.ArK@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>
>>>>>>K e n is not a fool.
>>>>>
>>>>>Would you care to wager on that, moron?
>>>>
>>>>K e n does not gamble. Gambling is illegal.
>>>>
>>>Thus resting the point I made above. Only one who knows they can not win would respond as such,
>>>which also proves you are a fraud.  Don't respond to this by saying something like:
>>>
>>>    K e n is not a fraud, for K e n is K e n and cannot lie.
>>
>>Why shouldn't he say that?  After all, it is the truth.
>To you, not to me. To me and others I have met, he is as bad as you are now
>becoming

If you don't like what he says, then why do you continuously argue with
him?  You have been fighting a losing battle against K e n.

>>>It would only prove me correct in my theory.  As to the point of my intelligence, you know nothing
>>>of how intelligent I am nor are you able to know.
>>
>>You have no intelligence, as evidenced by all of the drivel you post.
>>
>I don't post drivel. I post my opinion, which is my right. I respect the fact
>that you are voicing yours, but I can not respect for whom you side with in
>this post. Ken is posting the "drivel" in my opinion. I find your worship
>of Ken to be a waste of your valuable time. So if you don't want to listen to

I am not wasting any time reading alt.flame.

>my opinion, then use your right and don't read my posts, which is wasting my
>valuable time.

My posts are not forcing you to waste your time.  Do what you wish to do with
your "valuable" time.

>>>>>>>I await your answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Your answer has been given.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think not.  Try again moron.
>>>>
>>>>No need to, for K e n is correct.
>>>
>>>That is not correct. K e n is incorrect. 
>>
>>K e n was (and always is) correct.  You are incorrect.
>
>Are you sure of this?  Would you care to have a contest on this?

K e n always posts the truth and nothing but the truth.  There is no contest
to that.  You would lose a contest if one were initiated.

>>>>>PS   If you should want a clue as toward the answer to my riddle, e-mail me.
>>>>>     You have my address.
>>>>
>>>>K e n does not require clues, for K e n is correct. You sir, are in dire
>>>>need of clues.
>>>>
>>>K e n does require clues, for K e n was unable to answer.
>>
>>Since K e n was correct, K e n does not require clues.
>
>Ken wasn't correct, he didn't give the correct answer to my riddle.

K e n was correct.

-- 
Bruce A Bufalini <bufalini@.gis.psu.edu>
"Blame is better to give than receive."  --  Neil Peart, 1980
"Take it easy -- or any way you can." -- Brian "Launch Pad" Mansberry,
                                                         among others
Newsgroups: alt.flame