HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: umeister@leland.Stanford.EDU (Eushuk Hong)
Subject: Re: Star Trek Vessels in PostScript?
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 21:04:05 GMT

In article <C1F4GM.5KD@news.cso.uiuc.edu> bau55536@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Larry Combs Jr) writes:
>D.J.Miller@newcastle.ac.uk (Dave Miller) writes:
>
>>  does anyone out there know where I can get hold of some PostScript files of various Trek ships. I did have a great one of a Rommie Warbird
>>and would appreciate any pointers to FTP sites.
>

You'll find several excellant PostScript files of the Enterprise and one of
a Romulan warbird on ftp.uu.net in the /usenet/rec.arts.startrek/STARTREK/
PSimages/enterprise or /romulan directory.  This site is a mirror of the
much slower ftp.coe.montana.edu.

Hope this helps!

Eushuk


-- 
*------Eushuk Hong--------------------*----#include disclaimer.h----*
|      Umeister@Leland.Stanford.EDU   |  "Most people wouldn't know |
|      Sophomore, Psychology          |   reason  if it came up and |
*------Stanford University------------*---shook their hand." -Odo---*
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: d_ellis@ricks.enet.dec.com (David Ellis  26-Jan-1993 1344)
Subject: Grammar (was: TNG Companion)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 10:45:27 PST
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA02196; Tue, 26 Jan 93 10:45:29 -0800
X-Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA09613; Tue, 26 Jan 93 10:45:27 -0800
X-Received: from ricks.enet; by decwrl.enet; Tue, 26 Jan 93 10:45:27 PST
X-To: rec.arts.startrek.misc.usenet
X-Apparently-To: rec.arts.startrek.misc.usenet

[relocated from rec.arts.startrek.current to rec.arts.startrek.misc]

There's been an argument about the following sentence:

"Like Tim and I, Nemecek started out doing fan produced guides."

Several people have claimed that "Tim and I" is incorrect in this context and 
that it should be "Like Tim and me".  Others have disputed this.

The sentence as originally written is gramatically incorrect.  It is clearly 
wrong to use the pronoun "I" as an object of the preposition "like".  

The grammatically acceptable alternatives include the following:

(1) "Like Tim and me,"
(2) "[Just] as Tim and I did,"

In choice (1), the first person pronoun "me" is the object of "like".
In choice (2), the first person pronoun "I" is the subject of "did" (in a 
construction parallel to "Nemecek started out doing...").

There's a major difference between the preposition "like" and the conjunction
"as".  They are not handled the same way!

The grammatical rules are clear and should not be open to dispute.  Please, 
folks, let's put this one to rest.  

----
David  J  Ellis
Digital Equipment Corporation,          Semiconductor Engineering Group
77 Reed Road, Hudson MA 01749           Mailstop HLO2-3/D11         
Internet: d_ellis@ricks.enet.dec.com    Phone: (508) 568-4393
From: paul.parkhurst@uttsbbs.uucp (Paul Parkhurst) 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: JAMES DOOHAN MOVIE CAMEO
Date: 27 Jan 93 00:17:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Transfer Station BBS, Danville, CA - 510-837-4610/837-5591
Reply-To: paul.parkhurst@uttsbbs.uucp (Paul Parkhurst) 

-> i was watching television a couple of days ago, and a promo for the
-> movie National Lampoons Loaded Weapon I came on.  During the promo,
-> they show a captain of a ship or sub, i couldn't tell which, was
-> yelling to the engine saying, "We need some more power, Scotty!!"  At
-> which the camera pans to the right and James Doohan turns around and
-> yells as only Jimmy Doohan can, "I'm giving her all she can take."
-> or something along his classic Star Trek line.  I did a double take
-> when i heard that.
->
-> as for the movie, its looks just like it titles says, a cross of
-> National Lampoon, Lethal Weapon, and Naked Gun.

   I saw that ad, too, and had a good laugh.  I also took a quick look
at the screen credits and I could have SWORN I saw "William Shatner"
there.  Maybe the two of them are having a bit of fun.

Paul Parkhurst

paul.parkhurst@uttsbbs.UUCP
               
----
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| The Transfer Station BBS (510) 837-4610 & 837-5591 (V.32bis both lines)|
| Danville, California, USA. 400+ MB Files & FREE public Internet Access |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist)
Subject: Re: homosexuality in ST
Followup-To: /dev/null
Organization: Lachman Technology, Incorporated, Naperville, IL
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 17:01:29 GMT

In article <gd.02lb@evil.Demon.Co.Uk> gd@evil.demon.co.uk (Geoff Dooley) writes:
>In article <1993Jan24.181455.1@vax1.mankato.msus.edu> skuff@vax1.mankato.msus.edu writes:
>> RE: Homosexuality in Star Trek
>
>Surley they would have cured homsexuality by then?
>
>


I believe you meant to say "Surely they would have cured bigotry about
homosexuality by then?"
-- 
Jonathan E. Quist                              Lachman Technology, Incorporated
jeq@i88.isc.com  '71 CL450-K4 "Gleep", DoD #094        Naperville, IL
 __       There's nothing quite like the pitter-patter of little feet,
 \/                   followed by the words "Daddy!  Yay!"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.current
From: marcia@rap.ucar.edu (Marcia Politovich)
Subject: Re: Paramount Press Release - DS9 - #405: Babel
Organization: NCAR, Research Application Program
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:02:40 GMT

In article <1993Jan15.215209.29193@choate.edu> dsohl@spock.uucp (Daniel Sohl) writes:
>In article <4760@vidiot.UUCP> brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes:
>>
>>Babel
>>
>>Episode #405
>                  [lots of stuff deleted]
>>
>>				_C_A_S_T
>>
>>       Commander Benjamin Sisko                Avery Brooks
>>	Aphasia Victim				Lee Brooks
>>
>>	Lieutenant Jadzia Dax			Terry Farrell
>>	Galis Blin				Geraldine Farrell
>
>Anybody notice any similarities in the names? Just wondering... <G>
>-- 

 Maybe it would be a bit more noticeable if 
  there were multiple Wycznewski's.....or 
  some name not as common as Brooks or Farrell..... 
 (sorry, but when ya' got a last name like mine, 
   these simpler names just pass you by)
From: jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Young Kirk
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:09:50 GMT
Organization: Lachman Technology, Incorporated, Naperville, IL

In article <1k2qd5INN2di@escargot.xx.rmit.OZ.AU> raeram@kittyhawk.aero.rmit.OZ.AU (Richard A. Muirden) writes:
>A.M.T.Bell@daresbury.ac.uk (A.M.T. Bell) writes:
>
>>Hello folks
>
>>I was watching the current series of "The Wonder Years" (1992 series) and it
>>struck me how much Fred Savage looks like a young Capt. Kirk. If they ever
>>make the "Academy Days" film I suggest they get Fred to play James T.
>
>oh that would be just what the casters and promoters would love!!
>
>"young hotshot star Savage plays James T. Kirk!"
>
>somehow I don't think it would work.

Somehow, I think McCauley Calkin would make a more
appropriate young James Tike Kirk.

After all, Fred Savage _can_ act.
-- 
Jonathan E. Quist                              Lachman Technology, Incorporated
jeq@i88.isc.com  '71 CL450-K4 "Gleep", DoD #094        Naperville, IL
 __       There's nothing quite like the pitter-patter of little feet,
 \/                   followed by the words "Daddy!  Yay!"
Organization: City University of New York/ University Computer Center
Date: Sunday, 24 Jan 1993 22:05:37 EST
From: <WITHC@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Tech Manual

In article <1jvc3uINNju9@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>, ko_mike@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu
(Michael Y Ko) says:
>
>Are there any hints if Michael Okuda and Rick Sternbach are going to release
>a
>a tech manual for Deep Space Nine? Or is it do soon?
>

The show is still in its infant stage, why spoil the surprise?  :)  Besides, it
took four to five seasons before a Tech Manual came out for TNG...
From: rebecca@order.ph.utexas.edu (Rebecca McGowan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Patrick Stewart question
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:44:22 GMT

Is Patrick Stewart married?  If so, to whom?  I heard a very unlikely  
rumor
which I will not repeat, but I would appreciate reliable info.

Thanks, 
	Rebecca
From: geoffb@coos.dartmouth.edu (Thumper)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: STVI and O'Brien and DS9
Date: 25 Jan 93 19:18:08 GMT
Reply-To: geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU
Distribution: rec
Organization: Amos Tuck School
Disclaimer: I don't represent Dartmouth and Dartmouth doesn't represent me.

In <1993Jan24.055536.26527@nevada.edu> takashi@nevada.edu (Edward T. Tonai) writes:

>Are you SURE Colonel Wolf isn't played by Rene Auberjonois?  If so, just
>who IS the actor who plays Colonel Wolf?

Colonel WEST is played by Rene Auberjonois in STVI.
There is no Colonel Wolf in the film.

>But Worf doesn't exactly have a lot to do with my original question, now,
>does it???

Since your original article was so vague and there was no 'Colonel Wolf'
"Worf" was the next guess.

_Geoff
--
geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU - Computing Support Consultant, Tuck School of Business

	"Windows 3.1 won't change the success of the Mac."
		- Bill Gates, Microsoft Corp. CEO
From: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: MOST OVERRATED EPISODE
Date: 23 Jan 93 01:23:57 GMT
Reply-To: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Dept., Madison, WI

I would say "The Measure Of A Man".  Now, the idea (is Data sentient?) is
fine, and the acting was excellent, but the episode suffered from amazingly
inept plotting, such as:

- Riker as prosecutor!  (This is so dumb no more need be said.)
- Is Data sentient?  Gee, you mean that Starfleet not only let him in, but
  ALLOWED HIM TO ADVANCE TO COMMAND RANK before deciding that this ought to be
  determined?
- Maddox's unbelievable change of heart at the end of the episode.
- A case of such potentially monumental import being decided in the boonies of
  the Federation.

Possibly the biggest misfire in the whole series.

-- 
Michael Rawdon				  rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department,  Madison, WI

"Go?  Where are we going?"
"Where they went."
"Suppose they went nowhere?"
"Then, this will be your big chance to get away from it all."
			- McCoy and Kirk; Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: takashi@nevada.edu (Edward T. Tonai)
Subject: Re: STVI and O'Brien and DS9
Organization: University of Nevada System Computing Services
Distribution: rec
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:22:27 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.152947.21447@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> johnnyp@HALDI.LCS.MIT.EDU (Johnny Piscitello) writes:
>>
>>Are you SURE Colonel Wolf isn't played by Rene Auberjonois?  If so, just
>>who IS the actor who plays Colonel Wolf?
>>
>	Yes, he's sure. Michael Dorn played Colonel Worf.
>
>
>>But Worf doesn't exactly have a lot to do with my original question, now,
>>does it???
>
>	Well, only because you refuse to accept the answer to your question.
>Worf and Colonel Worf are played by the same actor, Michael Dorn.
>
>>
>>I didn't notice the credit for Colonel Wolf at the end, but I wasn't wearing
>>my glasses at the time...
>>
>
>	Well, you obviously couldn't see too well if you mistook Michael
>Dorn for Rene Auberjonois!

	Hey, pal, learn to read.  Do you have some kind of problem 
differentiating l's from r's?  I said Colonel WOLF!!!!  WOLF with an L!
Not Worf with an R!  Wolf!  Colonel Wolf!  Like Wolf-359!  Like the dog-like
animal!  Like as in Lone Wolf and Cub!  Like as in Castle Wolfenstein!
Like as in Wolfie, the fake name that the T-800 gave to the T-1000 for
John Connor's dog!  WOLF!  Like the cub scout level under Bear!
	And if you DON'T remember who Colonel Wolf is, either rent STVI
or wait for it on HBO!  

	Okay, bub?!?!

Edward T. Tonai
takashi@redrock.nevada.edu

Don't you have anything better to do than to bug me about not having a .sig?
From: pat@berry.Cary.NC.US (Pat Berry)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Will TNG continue??
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 17:17:33 EST
Organization: Berry Communications

mlandaue@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Michael C Landauer) writes:

> pat@berry.Cary.NC.US (Pat Berry) writes:
> 
> >mlandaue@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Michael C Landauer) writes:
> 
> >> As I understand it (I'm not certain, however) TNG will continue, but Patri
> >> Stewart is leaving the show after this season.
> 
> >Who or what was your source for this information?
> 
> Nothing official, just stuff heard here, and read in the paper.

In that case, I advise that you disregard these claims.  I've heard
rumors of this sort every year, and they are never true.

Besides, think about it: if you were Patrick Stewart and you were
negotiating a new contract, would you tell the world what your real
intentions were?  Of course not.  Obviously, he's going to hint that he
might not come back for another season.  That's just negotiating
strategy.  But no one really knows what he intends to do except Stewart
himself.

-- 
Pat Berry - Cary, North Carolina, USA   | "Much to our dismay, the C compiler
pat@berry.Cary.NC.US                    | does not read the manuals."
**** Happy user of OS/2 2.0 ****        | Libes & Ressler, *Life with UNIX*
From: geoffb@coos.dartmouth.edu (Thumper)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Ques: ROMULAN Treaty and Neutral Zone
Date: 27 Jan 93 19:06:26 GMT
Reply-To: geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU
Organization: Amos Tuck School
Disclaimer: I don't represent Dartmouth and Dartmouth doesn't represent me.

In <sfNMouG00iV1Q4l0lS@andrew.cmu.edu> cc6e+@andrew.cmu.edu (Chris D Castro) writes:


>   My thanks to Geoff for his response.  I've seen the book with the
>treaty specifying 750 parsecs (the treaty signatores are Karzan and
>Thorpe, I think).  However, this distance is way, way, way too big.
>    A parsec is 19.2 trillion miles.  To travel a distance of 750
>parsecs at warp 1, which is the speed of light (186000 miles per
>second), would require 2453.3 years.  (At Enterprise-D's top, safe
>speed, it would still take more than a year to traverse the zone-this
>zone would be pretty effective at preventing wars, but a big damper on
>Romulan-related plots).

True. The Max speed of the Enterprise mentioned in the TNG Tech Manual
(Warp 9.2) makes this a rather difficult distance to cross in a realistic
amount of time. Even at 2000 times the speed of light you need time to
cross 750 parsecs :-)

I think we can assume a couple things. First, the 1975 Star Trek Tech
Manual isn't to be believed on this point. Since there wasn't any warp
drive when the first Romulan treaty was negotiated and the Romulan ship in
'Balance of Terror' was able to cross the zone in a reasonable amount of
time on impulse drive only there is NO way the zone could be 750 parsecs
wide. In fact a distance of 1 parsec is getting doubtful when you consider
"Balance of Terror."

So I guess our first idea, that the zone is as wide as the plot requires,
is the true and final conclusion. :-)

-Geoff
--
geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU - Computing Support Consultant, Tuck School of Business
    "I feel like a hypocrite talking to you... and your racist firends."
                            - They Might Be Giants
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: rsr4936@cc.utah.edu (Reay, Robert S.)
Subject: top 10 list
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Organization: University of Utah Computer Center
Date: 26 Jan 1993 21:01 MST  

With all the commotion about DS9, I felt that our courageous capitan needed 
some press badly.

So, without further adieu:

THE TOP 10 THINGS THAT REALLY PISS OFF PICARD

10. No one invites him to the poker game

9. Boothby yelling at him for "making that brat Crusher hang around him all 
   day.

8. Geordi -- beard goes on, beard comes off.  beard goes on, beard comes    
   off.

7. Q showing up and offering to sell him photos of Vash naked.

6. Vash showing up and offering to sell Beverly photos of Picard naked.

5. Riker and his damn whoopie cushions.

4. O'brian transferring to DS9 and trying to scoot out the back transporter
   without paying Picard the $20 he owes him.

3. Worf, for the fourth time this week, replacing the replicators Earl Grey
   tea pattern with the pattern for prune juice, claiming he just wants to 
   "Make a warrior out of the old guy."

2. Mr. Mott acting like a spurned lover whenever they see each other in the
   hallway.

And, the number one thing that pisses off Picard:

1.  TO:    Jean-Luc Picard, Captain, USS Enterprise
    FROM:  Cardassia Central Command
    RE:    How many lights were there?  Ha ha ha ha!




Hope you enjoyed

		rob
From: sasse@netcom.com (Ellen Sasse)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Angelique Pettyjohn
Date: 22 Jan 93 06:09:54 GMT
Organization: Netcom

colin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Colin Edward Mac Donald) writes: 

> Can anyone tell me who Angelique Pettijohn of (the original) Star Trek 
> played in the show and what episode(s) she appeared in?

She was in "Gamesters of Triskelion (sp?)" as "Shana", whom you will
remember as the skinny woman with a long, high bleached-blonde wig
and I believe a metallic-looking gold costume which I remember as
vaguely bikini-like.

Recently she appeared in Mike Jittlov's "Wizard of Speed and Time" as
someone in the movie industry (producer? I forget). Jittlov had an amusing
"daydream"-sequence which parodied some of the the -aah- *unclothed* movies
she's been in, and a publicity shot from "Gamesters" was hanging on the
wall of her office. It was a real hoot recognizing her. Contrary to
my opinion of her acting in "Gamesters" I thought she was pretty good
in "Wizard" (although that might not have been acting). I recommend
checking it out.

Ellen

PS: "Wizard" is a G-rated movie.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Subject: Paramount Press Release - DS9 - #405: Babel
Reply-To: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:19:18 EST

 -=> Psst...  Look what Bill Henley said to All!  Oh my god!!! <=-

 BH> Between the title "Babel" and the reference in the cast list to
 BH> an "aphasia victim", it sounds like the disease on board DS9
 BH> involves people losing the ability to communicate by language
 BH> -- that's what "aphasia" means, more or less, and of course
 BH> "Babel"refers to the Bible story in which God causes everyone
 BH> to speak different languages making them unable to understand
 BH> each other.  Could be an interesting story concept.

Really?  When I saw the name "Babel" I thought of the TOS episode 
"Journy to Babel", but then when I read what the episode was about I 
just thought it was a different spelling on "Babble"...


Jason Wong (not Bernie)       Gotta go rebuild that darn igloo...
INTERNET: bernie.wong@canrem.com                FIDONET: 1:229/15


... Who killed Laura Palmer?
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: Robert.T.Warfield@dartmouth.edu (Robert T. Warfield)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: READ THIS! O'Brien's Rank!
Date: 28 Jan 93 18:00:28 GMT
 <1993Jan22.141220.13984@bsu-ucs> <C1H5y6.1Lp@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>  
 <1993Jan28.021155.18248@newstand.syr.edu>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0b6@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <1993Jan28.021155.18248@newstand.syr.edu>
crdunlea@rodan.acs.syr.EDU (Christopher R. Dunlea) writes:

> >>But you never never never call and NCO 'sir'!
> >
> >    To assume that NCOs of the 24th century would be clinging to the
> >same tired old ways of the 20th is a bit far fetched IMHO.
> >
> >-Hades
> >--
> 
> Possibly, but then there's Riker, who still has that military CO Lt. Flap
> attitude. If the CO's have the attitude, why not the NCO's, who actually
> make sure things get done?
> 
> Chris
> 
  I seem to remember an episode where Riker commanded Worf "AT EASE!".
As for NCO's, the term "Don't call me sir, I work for a living" has
been around in some form since before the revolutionary war. It makes
sense that it would still be around in the time of star trek.
  If you look at O'Brian's collar, you will see that he has one hollow
pip. That is the rank of a junior ensign. Also, I belive transporter
chief Kyle from the original series was a lieutenant.

**********************************************************************
* Arthur, king of the Britons    * King of the who?                  *
* King of the Brittons!          * Who are the Brittons anyway?      *
* I am, you are, we all are the  *                                   *
* Brittons and I am your king!   * Well, I didn't vote for you.      *
**********************************************************************
Robert T. Warfield@dartmouth.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: mjv8557@eafs000.ca.boeing.com (Mark J. Vandiver)
Subject: Re: Young Kirk
Organization: be41t
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 19:52:15 GMT

bobd@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com (Bob D'Amore) writes:

>In article <1k2qd5INN2di@escargot.xx.rmit.OZ.AU=> raeram@kittyhawk.aero.rmit.OZ.AU (Richard A. Muirden) writes:
>=>A.M.T.Bell@daresbury.ac.uk (A.M.T. Bell) writes:
>=>
>=>>Hello folks
>=>
>=>>I was watching the current series of "The Wonder Years" (1992 series) and it
>=>>struck me how much Fred Savage looks like a young Capt. Kirk. If they ever
>=>>make the "Academy Days" film I suggest they get Fred to play James T.
>=>
>=>oh that would be just what the casters and promoters would love!!
>=>"young hotshot star Savage plays James T. Kirk!"
>=>somehow I don't think it would work.
>=>Anyway, read _Best Destiny_ and tell me that is Fred Savage? :)

I think that savages older brother on TWY looks and acts more like I would 
expect a young J.T Kirk to be like. Ref. The TOS Shore Leave, the fun loving,
prankster side shows there when he chases Finnegan, et al. Also TTWT shows
this side to some degree. I image the Young J.T.Kirk to be quite the imp,
never accepting 'no' as an answer, (the ans is no, I am Therefore going anyway)
and always getting into, or causing someone else trouble. That is Kevin's
brother to a tee! Never knowing when to shut up! and the facial features are
pretty close as well as the Wm. Shatner school of overacting experssions.
(love, fear, hate, anger, deep thought, and finally being ever so pleased with himself!)
Don't get me wrong!, I love Kirk! I think thet that is the type of individual that
would be necesarry to command a starship on the outer reaches of the galaxy, with the
closet help being 20 some odd days away. Now that that galaxy is more civilized (HA)
the Picard type fits the current diplomatic needs of the fleet. 

>I loved _Best_Destiny_.  After seeing the resemblence to Wes Crusher
>on the cover, I was relieved to learn young James T. was *not* anything
>even remotely close as a boy.  While I don't remember his name, the
>actor that played young Indiana Jones in the TV "..Chronicles" series
>seems a good choice to play young Kirk.  --BobD

>=>>tony bell                 ! keep on running   live long and prosper
>=>>serc daresbury laboratory ! I'm nowhere near 30, I'm 29!
>=>>atb@uk.ac.dl.gserv1       ! Maggie O'Connell, Northern Exposure.
>=>
>=>-richard
>=>-- 
>=>Richard Muirden, System Administator, RMIT.Aero. Engineering.. Office: 10.12.26
>=>raeram@kittyhawk.aero.rmit.OZ.AU --- IRC: GA --- 'phone: 660-3142 Fax: 660-2053 
>=>---------Hopeless Romantic, Fanatic of Shostakovich and "Star Trek" -----------

>-- 

>US MAIL: Bob D'Amore                            Concurrent Computer Corp.
>FAX: 908-870-5952   2 Crescent Pl.  Oceanport NJ 07757   Ph: 908-870-4654 
>UUCP:     princeton!ocpt!catfish!bobd    or    bobd@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc