From: lpb@STRATUS.SWDC.STRATUS.COM
Newsgroups: ca.politics
Subject: I'm Enraged: NWO Genocide; Health Care and War
Date: 21 Jul 92 21:35:09 GMT

Doesn't it seem strange to you all that King George claims and AIDS research 
figure mounting to the billions but statistics show less than that spent?

Doesn't it seem strange to you all with our much touted technology they couldn't
get rid of Hussein yet they did manage to kill well over 300,000 Iraqui
civilians???? That includes children. That they bombed homes, hospitals and
civvie shelters???? 

Does it seem strange to you that incurable diseases such as HIV, incurable
syphillis and ghonnorea(sp?), pneumonic plague, small pox, etc .... are on the
rise while health care ,dollars and research are dropping?????? For you 
arch-conservatives, don't waste your breath telling me budget figures unless you
want to get into why they don't cut the military budget.....thank you very much.

When will America wake up?!

Len



----- Begin Included Message -----

The genocidal roots of Bush's new world order 
by Kathleen Klenetsky

Millions of people will almost certainly die as a
consequence of Operation Desert Storm. According to some
estimates, one-half million Iraqis were killed in the U.S.
military offensive; the allied bombing raids killed
countless numbers of innocent civilians, while
accomplishing what a United Nations team called the
``near-apocalyptic'' destruction of the country's
infrastructure. 
   With its industrial and agricultural base now reduced
to rubble, its sewage and water systems wiped out, it is
feared that the disease, famine, and political turmoil
sweeping Iraq and threatening to spill over into
surrounding nations, will send the death toll soaring into
the stratosphere.               
   Yet there is one person who is mightily pleased by
this holocaust of human suffering: His name is George
Bush, and genocide runs in his blood. 
   For Bush, the more people who die, the better. Why?
Because he believes that there are too many people in the
world, especially black, brown, and yellow people, and that
eliminating them must be a principal goal of the world's
political leaders. If war helps get rid of some of these
``useless eaters'' efficiently, then so be it. 
   To Bush and his elite circle, the growth of the
world's population represents one of the most dangerous
threats imaginable, one that must be met with harsh
measures, including outright mass murder. 
   This perverse and profoundly anti-Christian view,
pervasive within the Anglo-American establishment, has not
only been the driving force in Bush's political career. It
was also one of the underlying motives behind his
Operation Desert Storm; and it undergirds the ``new world
order'' which he threatens to bring down upon the world. 

                  - Depopulation wars -
   As early as 1969, Bush--who had already declared
himself to be a staunch advocate of zero population
growth--was publicly discussing war as a method of
population reduction. Then a Republican congressman from
Texas, Bush told the House of Representatives on July 21,
1969 that unless the menace of human population growth
were to be ``recognized and made manageable, starvation,
pestilence, and war will solve it for us.'' 
   In light of the massive destruction wreaked by U.S.
firepower, can there be any question that Operation Desert
Storm was first and foremost a depopulation war--a war
whose primary objective was to kill as many people as
possible? 
   National Security Council memoranda dating from
1974-76, which were only recently declassified, should erase
any lingering doubts. 
   Written during the period when George Bush was a
high-ranking official in the Ford administration (first as
U.S. emissary to China, then as CIA director), and when
his current national security adviser, Brent Scowroft,
served President Ford in the same capacity, the documents
lay out the rationale for waging population wars
throughout the developing sector. 
   One key document which we excerpt in this report,
entitled ``Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for
U.S. Security and Overseas Interests''--claims that
population growth in the Third World represents a threat
to U.S. national security, and further asserts that
slashing population levels in the developing sector is
essential to guarantee the United States unfettered access
to raw materials. 
   Given this mentality, it is entirely credible that
the reason the Bush administration decided to bomb Iraq
back to the Stone Age had nothing to do with Saddam
Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, and everything to do with
the fact that Iraq has--or had--the fastest-growing
population in the Mideast, and that it wanted to secure a
decent price for its oil supplies so that it could support
that population. 
   The NSC memoranda were part of a process whereby
the goal of population reduction became a leading
objective of both U.S. foreign and domestic policy. This
process began in earnest in the mid-1960s, when
influential layers of the establishment began their
crusade to wipe out the notion of progress and the
sacredness of human life, and replace it with old,
discredited neo-malthusian and utilitarian dogmas. 
   The Carter administration's {Global 2000} report, the
Council on Foreign Relations' ``1980s Project,'' and the
reams of propaganda churned out by the major foundations
and zero-growth think tanks screaming about the population
bomb and man as a ``cancer'' destroying Mother Nature,
were all key elements in this drive for genocide. 

               - The same policy at home -
   But it was left to the Bush administration to take
the fraudulent idea that there are too many people in the
world to its logical, murderous, conclusion--not only with
its war on Iraq, but with its implementation of a policy
of ``malign neglect'' toward America's jobless, homeless,
elderly, minorities, and the poor. 
   This makes perfect sense. As we document below, Bush
has been in the vanguard of the war against the world's
``useless eaters'' since his first appearance on the
political stage back in the 1960s. He spearheaded the
drive for zero growth while a congressman, and has never
stopped since. 
   Can someone who hates people--because that is the
root of the neo-malthusian ideology--possibly run a
government devoted to the welfare of humanity? George Bush
has already answered that question; the question that
needs to be answered next is, how much longer will people
tolerate Bush's ``Texas chain saw massacre'' policies? 

>From EIR V18, #17.


Any comments, please send by email, as I get very far behind on this group.

Thanks.

         John Covici

covici@ccs.covici.com


Article 12543 of alt.activism: