HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: CXMP@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA (CXMP000)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: A Good Captain
Date: 21 Dec 92 20:10:39 GMT
Organization: McGill University

In article <1992Dec16.011130.13072@bsu-ucs> 00rdharringt@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu (Rob Harrington) writes:
>In article <ewright.724461900@convex.convex.com>, ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>> Perhaps your memory is failing you, then.  Riker *was* given
>> command of the Enterprise, in Best of Both Worlds.  Not "temporary
>> command," either -- no one expected to get Picard back at that point.
>
>Riker was given a "field promotion".  As a matter a fact I remember
>the admiral stating that he was being promoted to the "field rank of
>captain."  essentially the reason for this was that he was the most
>qualified person there to handle it and they didn't have the time or
>manpower to send out a replacement for Picard.  Had they not gotten
>Picard back I would assume that Riker would have kept his rank but
>moved on to a different ship.  You just don't give a guy the flagship
>as his first permenant command.
>
That's assuming things have changed since the days when Kirk was made
Captain of the Enterprise.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
!                               ! Address as above or use              !
! Martin Phipps (aka Deja Dude) ! LOULA@hep.physics.mcgill.ca or simply!
!                               ! MUHEP::LOULA if you're on a VAX      !
------------------------------------------------------------------------
!Read my stories on!Read what I have to say on!Not the Technical Manual!
!  alt.comics.lnh  !  rec.arts.comics.xbooks  ! rec.arts.startrek.tech !
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: 11dhackett@gallua.gallaudet.edu
Subject: ITV (Edmonton, Alberta) broadcast DS9 or DSN ?
Organization: Gallaudet University
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 05:26:37 GMT


Hello Trekkies, 

	Anybody there knows when the ITV in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada will 
broadcast premiere of the Deep Space Nine ? Please give an answer as soon 
as possible!


Darryl Hackett

11dhackett@gallua.bitnet
11dhacke@gallux.gallaudet.edu
From: jmconnel@oregon.uoregon.edu (John M. McConnell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Star Fleet Battles
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:35:21 GMT
Organization: University of Oregon
NNTP-Posting-Host: jmcconnell.uoregon.edu
Summary: Does anyone know of an appropriate group?

Does anyone know of an appropriate group for discussing the game
Star Fleet Battles?
		Thanks,
		John McConnell
		JMCONNEL@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: msmallwo@vdoe386.vak12ed.edu (M. Lee Smallwood)
Subject: Re: RIKER, KIRK'S SON
Organization: Virginia's Public Education Network (Richmond)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 02:24:19 GMT

How about this... Riker IS Kirk. Just after Star Trek (whenever
they stop making movies -- right now it looks like after Star
Trek 100), Kirk gets frozen in an ice cap on Earth. After 75
years, he wakes up and discovers that 75 years have passed. He
also learns that he is wanted for the murder of (that 5th guy
on the away team -- y'know, the one that always gets killed).
He goes to McCoy (who is senile) for some genetic alteration so
he doesn't get caught. McCoy gives him a new face ... and
deletes all his memories. After this happens, he is found and
"adopted" by <the person claiming to be Riker's father>, and is
given a totally new set of memories. He then meets Troi, who
messes him up even more. Is it any wonder that the man is so
twisted...

THIS EXPLAINS:
1. Why nobody ever mentions Kirk on the show,
2. The relationship between Troi and Riker,
3. Riker's 'father',
4. Why Riker was able to command the ship so well when Picard
was a Borg and,
5. Why LaForge can't do ANYTHING in less than 5 hours ;).
---
Lee Smallwood	msmallwo@vdoe386.vak12ed.edu	Tazewell HS
I got me a pocket full of kryptonite...
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Gord Locke)
Subject: Re: "Visit to a Weird Planet"
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
Distribution: rec
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:25:08 GMT

njzy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu (T. Joseph Lazio, Cornell University) writes:

> I was re-reading _Star Trek:  The New Voyages_ last night.  One
> of the stories is "Visit to a Weird Planet Revisited," in which 
> Shatner, Nimoy, and Kelly get beamed on board the Enterprise 
> and mistaken for Kirk, Spock, and McCoy (some type of 
> inter-dimensional gateway or something).  All in all, it's a 
> fairly humorous story.
>
> As the name of the story suggests, this story is based on 
> a story "Visit to a Weird Planet," by J. Lorrah and H. ?.
> Does anybody know how to get one's hands on a copy of 
> VtaWP?  Thanks in advance.

	I'd like a copy of this, too.  In fact I posted to the net about
it once before, but got no response.  I hope someone out there has a
copy of this they can type in; it sounds interesting.  The New Voyages
book is very good -- the bit of Trek fiction I most frequently pick up.
The second volume was also good (but not as good as the first), except
for that Marshak / Culbreath story where the whole crew gets a sex
change!  Blleeeaahh!!!!  And they admit they almost made it a novel.
Apparently, those two atrocious Pheonix novels started out as a short
story, too.
	Highlights from the two New Voyages books: Mind-Sifter (like
someone else has said) -- I cried the first couple of times I read this
one! -- The Sleeping God; Surprise!; The Hunting; Face on the Barroom
Floor; and heck, too many more for me to mention!
-- 
    Gord Locke, a.k.a.    |  It's quite simple:   |        Read: 
 glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca | Kate Bush RULES!!!!!! | _Small is Beautiful_
   Newfoundland, Canada   |    Any questions?     |  by E.F. Schumacher 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: "peter tindall" <peter.tindall@canrem.com>
Subject: a silly top 10 list
Reply-To: "peter tindall" <peter.tindall@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 23 Dec 92 08:10:24 EST

To: hofmann@math.toronto.edu




 TOP 10 REJECTED HALLMARK ORNAMENTS

 10.  Ferengi Ship, plays the message "Merry Christmas Human, I didn't pay
      retail for my presents, do I look stupid!"
 9.  'Time's Arrow' Data's Head.  Does nothing, but the eyes light up
 8.  U.S.S. Enterprise 1701-C.  Press a button and it appears on your tree
     22 years in the future

 7.  U.S.S. Bozeman, plays the message "Hey, is that a ship in front of us,
     to dodge it!  Hey, is that a ship in front of us?..."

 6.  Borg ship, plays the message "Your life as you know it is now over,
     resistance is futile, Happy Holidays"

 5.  Klingon warbird, plays the message "Klingons do not Celebrate Holidays
     with gifts, they celebrate with pain sticks"

 4.  From TOS, Nomad.  It plays "I am Nomad, I am perfect, Happy Holidays"
 3.  Cloaked Romulain Warbird (a hook attatched to nothing)

 2.  Exocomp ornament.  Automatically repairs burned-out christmas lights

 and the number one rejected Hallmark Ornament

 1.  TNG Shuttlecraft, with Montgomery Scott saying "Happy Holidays lad"

Bye bye NAT.


Peter
---
  SPEED 1.10 [NR]  
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.misc:13164 news.answers:4800
From: jsblau@panix.com (Jonathan Blau)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Worf in ST6?
Date: 3 Jan 93 20:49:15 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC

alix@iastate.edu (L.A. Melloy) writes:

>Eileen.Heady@dartmouth.edu (Eileen Heady) writes:

>>The Klingon who defends Kirk and McCoy in the Undiscovered Country
>>looks like (I'm almost sure it was him)  Michael Dorn...is he supposed
>>to be a relative of Worf's or did they just use Dorn for the part
>>because it was easier to make him up?

>Yes, that is Michael Dorn, and the klingon he is playing is Worf's grandfather.
>I can't remember his character's name, but I'm sure _someone_ will supply it
>for you.

The credits identify him as "Klingon Defense Attorney", and production
notes that Paramount supplied at a press screening in New York do
indeed say he plays Worf's grandfather.  I believe he is referred to
on screen as "Colonel Worf" by either the prosecutor, General Chang
(Christopher Plummer), or the judge (Robert Easton), but I could be
mistaken.  If you're really concerned with the true "canonicity" of
all of this, check with someone who has a tape.
-- 
Jonathan Blau        jsblau@panix.com      cmcl2!panix!jsblau
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: eroth@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (elizabeth.s.roth)
Subject: Re: FOR SALE: Star Trek Enterprise "Star Globe" $300.
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 19:46:27 GMT

In article <1hfr8qINNbj0@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bn202@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Gregg E. Woodcock) writes:
>
>I have spent the last several weeks tracking down these things
>and they are *IMPOSSIBLE* to find!  

I just saw lots of them at the local Penney's store.

>I did finally find a Hallmark
>store that had 5 and I bought them all.  I therefore have 4 left
>to sell.  Since these are many times more scarce than the 1991
>which are going for $250, I am going to sell these for $300 (that
>includes 1st class shipping to anywhere in the world) each.  These
>things are *very* cool; here is the description from the side of
>the box:
>

(description deleted)

I thought the Enterprise model inside the globe was VERY cheap
looking.  I don't know why you think they are more scarce than
last year's ornament.  The ornament was only available for a
couple of months.  These globes are going to be made for
12 months.

Personally, I'm waiting for Penney's year-end sales.


>
>NCC 1701 as featured in the original Star Trek television series.
>production Star Trek editions from Willitts Designs, each
>limited to twelve months of production.
>


>THANX...Gregg   woodcock@bnr.ca   day 214.684.7380   night 214.530.2495


-- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Education never helped morals ... the    -- WILL           (all the usual   <
> smarter the guy, the bigger the rascal.  -- ROGERS          disclaimers)    <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.misc:13026 rec.arts.startrek.fandom:1902
From: aa687@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Keith Ammann)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.fandom
Subject: Klingon language mailing list
Date: 24 Dec 1992 05:05:11 GMT
Organization: Books & Co., 2nd-largest independent bookstore in the U.S.
Reply-To: aa687@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Keith Ammann)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Please send me whatever information you've got about the Klingon
language mailing list.  All I can remember is that its name began
with "tlhIngan-Hol".  Thanxx.






-- 
If you cannot gather where you wish, you cannot assert yourself.
If you cannot believe what you wish, you cannot be at peace with yourself.
If you cannot say what you wish, you cannot defend yourself.
SUPPORT YOUR RIGHT TO BE TRUE TO YOURSELF -- SUPPORT THE FIRST AMENDMENT!
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Friday, 25 Dec 1992 15:59:49 CST
From: <U16028@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: FOR SALE: Star Trek Enterprise "Star Globe" $300.

In article <1hfr8qINNbj0@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, bn202@cleveland.Freenet.Edu
(Gregg E. Woodcock) says:
>
>I have spent the last several weeks tracking down these things
>and they are *IMPOSSIBLE* to find!  I did finally find a Hallmark
>store that had 5 and I bought them all.  I therefore have 4 left
>to sell.  Since these are many times more scarce than the 1991
>which are going for $250, I am going to sell these for $300 (that
>includes 1st class shipping to anywhere in the world) each.  These
>things are *very* cool; here is the description from the side of
>the box:
>
>U.S.S. Enterprise NCC 1701 Lighted Star Globe
>
>Star Trek
>To boldly go where no man has gone before...
>
>Join the maiden voyage of the U.S.S. Enterprise Star Globe
>from Willitts Designs!
>
>This exclusive limited production star globe features an
>authentic scale model reproduction of the U.S.S. Enterprise
>NCC 1701 as featured in the original Star Trek television series.
>
>The U.S.S. Enterprise Star Globe is the first of three limited
>production Star Trek editions from Willitts Designs, each
>limited to twelve months of production.
>
>Four alternating lights shine a dramatic wash of multicolored
>lights into the 110 mm glass globe filled with iridescent
>glitter.  The removable hood creates an exciting space environment
>and enhances the globe's lighting and design.  The attractive
>black base features the official Star Trek emblem and logo in
>handsome gold lettering.  An on-off switch is included on the
>underside of the base.  Batteries not included.
>
>A specially designed removable hood creates a space environment
>for the globe.
>
>Item No. 47051
><UPC Bar Code = 0  30009 47051  1>
>--
>THANX...Gregg   woodcock@bnr.ca   day 214.684.7380   night 214.530.2495
>*CLASSIC VIDEOGAME COLLECTOR BUY/SELL/TRADE PRE-NINTENDO (ARCADE/HOME)*
>"If you quote me on this I'll have to deny it; I won't remember because
>I have such a bad memory.  Not only that, but my memory is *terrible*."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is he for real??????

My sis walked into a Gold Crown Store in middle New York state and
bought me one for Christmas (for $50).  I just bought one last
Wednesday for $37.50 at J.C.Penney here in suburban Chicago.  Someone
else recently posted the same experience with Penney, but in Austin, Tx.

Sounds to me like the "Cabbage Patch Doll" frenzy of 6 or 7 years ago.

Terry
U16028@uicvm.uic.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Subject: enterprise model colours
Reply-To: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 1 Jan 93 00:29:20 EST

 -=> Gregory Pius babbled to All and look what he said! <=-

 GP> When AMT molded the Enterprise-D "in color", they molded it in this
 GP> awful pukey duck-eggshell blue.

Ya, many people have incorrectly told me duck egg blue, but duck egg
blue is actually the colour AMT says the E-D DETAIL should be painted
in, not the base.

 GP> When I built all three of mine, the base color I used was actually a
 GP> can of Krylon gray primer! It's actually a really nice medium gray, and
 GP> then I dry-brushed the whole thing LIGHTLY with silver and black (if
 GP> you don't know what dry-brushing is, write me back).

Hmmm, I'm kinda worried about risking mixing a colour or
"experimenting".  Also, someone else told me that drybrushing is where
you take off about 99% of the paint from the brush onto the edge of the
jar, making the paint go where you REALLY want it.

 GP> For the warp nacelles, use Testor's Auto paints: Flat Red and Flat
 GP> Blue. Paint the INSIDE of the clear plastic parts their appropriate
 GP> colors, and dry-brush the outside with gold.

Are you sure FLAT red and FLAT blue?  I mean, at they ask for
TRANSPARENT paints -- shouldn't gloss be the more adviseable scheme?

 GP> The decals will dry up and flake off after a few months. You can
 GP> prevent this with a light spray coat of Testors Dullcoat.

The local hobbyist couldn't identify the colour for me, but did
sympathize with me on not wanting the plastic look.  He advised me to
paint all the detail and not worry about the base because the mold IS
the right colour (even though it looks a little more greyish on the TV).
I bought a dullcoat and he said to spray it all over the model after to
get rid of the plastic look.  I want your advise -- will this work?

Another user told me that AMT decals will NOT stick to flat colours, and
only gloss.  He advised I buy an additional glosscoat spray and spray
the entire model with the glosscoat (after the detail is painted),
apply the decals, and then put on another glosscoat (or dullcoat I
suppose).  This way the decals are sandwhiched between the two coats and
will not flake off after a few months.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jason Wong
Calling from Markham, Ontario CANADA.  It's not cold though!  :-)
INTERNET E-MAIL: bernie.wong@canrem.com


... The Klingon Empire has roughly 50 years of life.  C-in-C
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: Re: Universal translaters-
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 18:32:28 GMT

petitc@vccnw02.its.rpi.edu (Christopher Jon Petit) writes:

>quetzal@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Quetzal) writes:

>>I've got a question about these U.T.s.  Why, in ST VI:TUC, didn't they
>>feed the Klingon outposts "What ship is this? Over" through one?  Surely
>>they could handle Klingon; the races had been in contact for a very long
>>time. . .

> I think that an attack destroyed their Universal Translator.

Actually, I recall this rather well.  They didn't want to use the U.T. 
because it would be recognized.  They needed to make the Klings beleive
they were also Klings, and using the UT was not the way to do it.

Katherine Merle Mason
Ne Oublie....
Ne Oublie....
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.misc:12954 rec.arts.startrek.tech:7119
From: 2186filterj@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.tech
Subject: Re: Universal translaters-
Date: 22 Dec 1992 05:44:29 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 2186filterj@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsd.csd.mu.edu

In article <katherim.724962748@sfu.ca>, katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>petitc@vccnw02.its.rpi.edu (Christopher Jon Petit) writes:
>
>>quetzal@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Quetzal) writes:
>
>>>I've got a question about these U.T.s.  Why, in ST VI:TUC, didn't they
>>>feed the Klingon outposts "What ship is this? Over" through one?  Surely
>>>they could handle Klingon; the races had been in contact for a very long
>>>time. . .
>
>> I think that an attack destroyed their Universal Translator.
>
>Actually, I recall this rather well.  They didn't want to use the U.T. 
>because it would be recognized.  They needed to make the Klings beleive
>they were also Klings, and using the UT was not the way to do it.
>
>Katherine Merle Mason
>Ne Oublie....
>Ne Oublie....

Well, I think you're a little mistaken, Katherine.  The Enterprise knew that
the klingons knew that they were not a klingon ship.  Scotty & Co. didn't want
to use the U.T. because that translates into perfect klingonese and only the
Feds really have the $$ to own one of those, so they made like traders who only
know enough klingonese to get by.  And considering the things that they
actually said, (I can't remember off hand, but I could look it up on my tape)
everybody KNOWS they weren't klingons.

-Jon
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist)
Subject: Re: ST:TNG Seasons 1-3 in stereo?
Organization: INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation, Naperville, IL
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:11:02 GMT

In article <4623@vidiot.UUCP> brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes:
>In article <1992Dec21.163919.6289@i88.isc.com> jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist) writes:
><Since ST:TNG is produced in stereo, the master audio source (be it analog tapes,
><digital audio on disk, or wax Edison cylinders) is undoubtedly much more
><than 2 track stereo.  Mixing down to mono would be slightly less work than
><mixing to stereo (ignoring whatever effort it takes to do the surround),
><and conceivably could be done simultaneously, depending on the engineering
><facilities involved...
>
>Tapes used for making dubs don't go that far back.  They normally use a 1"C,
>or BetaCamSP tape, which is the already mixed stereo.  To make the mono 1"C
>PAL tapes that the BBC received required extra work to make mono.

Are you sure about that?  What about foreign language versions?

>It is pretty stupid to make a mono tape.

From a stereo master, perhaps, but if you plan on broadcasting in mono,
you'd damn well better master the soundtrack for mono.

-- 
Jonathan E. Quist                              INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation
jeq@i88.isc.com  '71 CL450-K4 "Gleep", DoD #094        Naperville, IL
                Celebrate the winter holiday of your choice by
                  offering your hand to someone who needs it.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: hikonen@mits.mdata.fi (Harri Ikonen)
Subject: Wanted: Help with TNG tapes!
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 21:27:48 GMT


I am thinking of ordering the first season STTNG tapes from UK and I got
a catalog from a mail-order company. However, I noticed that the episodes
are NOT in any kind of order (For example, tape #13 has second season
episodes "A Matter Of Honor" and "The Measure Of Man" when it's supposed
to have the last episodes of the first season) and the catalog didn't
have the contents for all of the tapes.

Also, some of the prices were extremely high. The normal price is about
10-11 UK pounds, but there were couple of tapes, which cost #49.95 !!

There were also two versions of "Unification", the first costs #10.99 and
the second #49.95. I have the cheaper tape, but what is this expensive
version?

So, could someone mail me the contents of the tapes #1-24 and confirm if
some tapes really have *that* high prices. I have a feeling that the
company is trying to rip me off...

Thanks in advance!

--
    ^               Harri Ikonen -- hikonen@mits.mdata.fi               ^     
 _ ' ` _  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-  _ ' ` _  
(_` _ '_)      "Every nanosecond in this continuum is a moment      (_` _ '_) 
  :' `:            in history once it has elapsed" -- Data            :' `:   

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Gord Locke)
Subject: Re: Squire of Gothos
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 20:14:02 GMT

ses52823@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Marius) writes:

>I liked this episode as well.
>
>I think a *really* good way to enter a tie-in in a non-cheesy manner
>would be the reentrance of Trelane (now a fully adult Q, or whatever
>he was supposed to be in the first place -- the Q would be the best
>choice, however) into a Next Generation episode.
>
>We could have him bickering with the Q we all know and love (they
>could point out that one was older than the other and had existed in
>the continuum as a separate distinct consciousness for a longer period
>of time, thus gathering more powers and authority... this may have
>been the premise for the rumored 'Duelling Qs' episode).

	This indeed was the rumour I read on one of the newsgroups --
that Trelane's character would return, and he would be "revealed"
(retconned) to be one of the "Q".  This never materialized, as we know.
However, in an upcoming (shipping February?) DC Star Trek comic, Trelane
re-visits the 1701-A crew.  The comics are currently set during the time
between TFF and TUC.  Maybe this theory about the Q continuum will be
explored, or at least hinted at.  I hope so.

>______________________________
>
>Marius ses52823@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
>
>______________________________
-- 
    Gord Locke, a.k.a.    |  It's quite simple:   |        Read: 
 glocke@morgan.ucs.mun.ca | Kate Bush RULES!!!!!! | _Small is Beautiful_
   Newfoundland, Canada   |    Any questions?     |  by E.F. Schumacher
From: Charles.Durfee@idic.fidonet.org (Charles Durfee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Other Shows and Movies
Date: 28 Dec 92 23:50:01 GMT


 ))) My computer thinks Karen Boss said this to All ((( 

 KB> He was in the movie "Dune" with Kyle MacLachlin from Twin Peaks and (I
 KB> think)   Timothy Dalton from the 007 movies.

Sorry Karen, but Timothy Dalton wasn't in "Dune".  Dean Stockwell ("Quantum
Leap") was though, and you might be thinking of him.

Charles Durfee

... My name is Inigo Montoya.  You killed my tagline.  Prepare to die.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc