HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tlc20700@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Thomas L. Carney)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: HELP
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:41:02 GMT
Article-I.D.: ux1.1992Apr10.174102.25791
Distribution: rec
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

tatsuya@hamblin.math.byu.edu (& Kawasaki) writes:

>Dela Airline told me that operating Ham in airplane is upto a captain
>to decide...
>I am wondering is there any interfarence(sp?) bewteen them


It's not just a problem between 440MHz and commercial airline frequency
It's also a problem with a transmitter located on the aircraft interfering
with avionics, navigational aids etc.,

That is why there is a federal regulation regarding transmitters onboard
aircraft.

Also FYI we amateurs share the 440MHz band with aircraft radar.  Your
handheld could conceivably and most likely cause problems.

Tom  WB9RXJ
Xref: sparky rec.radio.amateur.misc:7725 news.answers:1044
From: 99681084@uwwvax.uww.EDU (Mike Gordon N9LOI 99681084@uwwvax.uww.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Bad birthday on callbook server
Date: 7 Apr 1992 19:55:00 -0700
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu


Hi everyone,

   I finally got a chance to look myself up on the callbook server (Marvin),
and have found, to my dismay, that my birthday was listed wrong.  While I
was born is April 4th 1972, I'm listed as September 4th 1977.  I guess that
4/4/72 could look like 9/4/77, but my handwriting isn't THAT bad.
   Anyways, do I have to file a new 610 (or other form?), or should I just
wait until I renew in 9 years?

Mike Gordon  N9LOI
99681084@uwwvax.uww.edu

Disclaimer:  I am not 15, the FCC just can't read!
From: chuck_adams@qmail.ssc.gov (Chuck Adams)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: On the durability of ham HT's and commercial HT's
Date: 10 Apr 92 16:45:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: sunova.1992Apr10.164514.29617
Organization: Superconducting Super Collider Laboratory

In article <s4e21INN133@grapevine.EBay.Sun.COM> dlp@zule.EBay.Sun.COM (Dan 
Pritchett) writes:

> Been through rain with me several times, no damage. BTW, my friends 2SAT
> was submerged a few days ago by accident. After careful drying the radio
> works fine.


This is known as "Takes a Dunking and keeps on Kerchunking"..........




               Chuck Adams,  WB5WRR   (The Chuckster)
                Internet:  chuck_adams@qmail.ssc.gov
   Disclaimer:  Not an official document of DOE, SSCL, URA or EG&G
                   "Curses!  Flamed Again"  - me
From: myers@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Bob Myers)
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 18:22:58 GMT
Subject: Re: Disney & 97.113
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc

> 	I fully support the intent of 97.113.  I don't believe that Ham
> Radio's needs are being served if we allow any "business"
> communications to take place on our bands.  The present move by the FCC
> to help us use our excess "capasity" scares me.

I agree with you to a point, but I'm at a loss to explain how my ordering
a pizza via the local patch or various other examples of "personal business"
constitute much threat to Ham Radio As We Know It.  Still, I would object to
the blatant commercialization of the ham bands.  It does seem to me that
some rule-making IS in order, to permit the former while guarding against the
latter.  My question is - how could a rule be written to do so?  I think
everyone knows what we WANT, it's just a matter of coming up with the proper
verbage so we don't get more than we bargained for (such as the use of
"excess capacity" by commercial interests).  Any suggestions?


Bob Myers  KC0EW   Hewlett-Packard Co.      |Opinions expressed here are not
                   User Interface Tech. Div.|those of my employer or any other
myers@fc.hp.com    Fort Collins, Colorado   |sentient life-form on this planet.
From: 10u6579@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: BX-81 tube (what is it?).
Date: 10 Apr 92 21:21:38 +1000
Organization: University of New South Wales

Hi,
   Has anyone out there heard of a tube called a BX-81?  It is some sort of
transmitting tube.  If you have any ideas please E-mail
Best Wishes,
Joe,
University of NSW,
Sydney Australia.
From: furr@pilot.njin.net (Grover Furr)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: qrq (fast cw nets)
Keywords: cw, nets, qrq
Date: 7 Apr 92 17:19:39 GMT
Organization: Montclair State College, Upper Montclair, NJ


	I'd still like to know of fast CW NETS (QRQ).

	When I posted this query two weeks ago, I got one reply --
about fast CW broadcasts. But I understand there are NETS where
high-speed CW'ers meet to hone their skills and converse with each
other.
	If anyone knows when/where these NETS meet, please either post
or e-mail me. Thanks!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Grover C. Furr

Home: 121 Oakland Terrace               Work: English Department
      Newark, NJ 07106                        Montclair State College
      ARS AA2GP                               Upper Montclair, NJ 07043
email: furr@pilot.njin.net
       furr@apollo.montclair.edu
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
From: fyl@ssc.wa.com (Phil Hughes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Benton Harbor Lunch Box...Gonset
Date: 16 Apr 92 20:48:22 GMT
Organization: SSC, Inc., Seattle, WA

In article <1992Apr15.090513.1@matrix.cs.wright.edu> isoper@matrix.cs.wright.edu writes:
>Along the same lines as the Benton Harbor Lunchbox series, does anyone
>remember the Gonset Communicator series and their SSB version the Sidewinder.

>I think they were actually BHLB's they had grown up slightly, they had the
>same general shape but, weighed about 50 to 60 pounds. There was a 10, 6 and
>2 meter versions of the Communicators. The only Sidewinder I saw was at 
>a field day in 1969 that the Dayton Amatuer Radio Assoc. sponsored, it was
>a SSB rig running about 25 to 50 watts. I am not sure that this version was
>for any other band than 2 meters.

The "Gooney Boxes" were around before the BHLB. They were a box with
three chassis in it: receiver, transmitter and power supply.  The Gonset
III had a different shape than the I and II but All they did was change
where the guts fit in the box.

There was also a linear for them.  It had an 826 in it.  There was a
window so you could see the tube.  That way you could tune by the color of
the plate of the tube.  Really!

My introduction to 2mtr FM was working on a net (high school football game
coverage) on 146.70.  There were some people talking on the "same
frequency" and I asked them to QSY.  They explained that they were
on 147.76 FM (yes, good old '76 in LA in the '60s) and they couldn't QSY.
A couple of years later I had a good old 40V on 146.76.


-- 
Phil Hughes, SSC, Inc. P.O. Box 55549, Seattle, WA 98155  (206)FOR-UNIX
     uunet!nwnexus!ssc!fyl or fyl@ssc.wa.com            (206)527-3385
From: ami9667@venus.tamu.edu (IACOVIDES, ANDREAS MICHAEL)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Yaesu FT-209RH, FT-212RH WANTED
Date: 6 Apr 92 22:04:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Does anyone know any mods for the FT-209RH (HT) or the FT-212RH of
Yaesu? 

Andreas Iacovides - 5B4SJ/W5
From: stanley@skyking.OCE.ORST.EDU (John Stanley)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: 70cm radios on airlines (was: HELP)
Date: 17 Apr 92 20:05:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: talon.1992Apr17.200546.18603
Distribution: na
Organization: Oregon State University, College of Oceanography

In article <1992Apr12.155405.1@ttd.teradyne.com> rice@ttd.teradyne.com writes:
>Before 'fixing' the FAQ, please verify that information. The FAA interpretation
>of FAR 91.21 has been that "The PIC of a commercial airliner does NOT have
>the authority to give that permission". This got 'beat to death' a month or
>so ago in a number of newsgroups, in regard to cell phones.

And the result of that beating to death was still a lack of evidence
that the FAA's interpretation is any different than what the FAR says.
The FAR does NOT say that the PIC does NOT have the authority. The FAR
places the responsibility on the operator, but does NOT specify who has
the authority to make the decision within the operator's organization.

I.e., it is up to the OPERATOR to decide who makes the decision, but the
operator is responsible for whatever that decision is.  That is what the
FAR says. And in the case when there is no operator acting under an
operating certificate, the PIC is specified as having the
responsibility.

>  FAR 91.21 reads in part 

   [out of date regulation deleted]

>note: My copy is out of date, so there might have been some changes.

There have been, as you were told during the last discussion of this
topic, and a correct version was supplied. Please stop posting out of
date regulations as support for your claim that the FAR's prohibit the
PIC from making this decision.
From: myers@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Bob Myers)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 19:27:04 GMT
Subject: Re: HTX-202 Mod Retraction
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc

> Does anyone have the mod for the Realistic Flavoradio [mine's orange] for
> it to do 300w tx on the HBO sattelite band?  I got the mods to allow me
> to talk to God on it, but I'm getting bored with that.


Are you SURE you're licensed for that band?  God's an UltraAdvancedSuperExtra,
and Him 'n' me are usually the only ones who hang around those frequencies.
Does make for a short net roll-call, of course....


(:-) for the humor-impaired....er, sorry, "comedically challenged")


Bob Myers  KC0EW   Hewlett-Packard Co.      |Opinions expressed here are not
                   User Interface Tech. Div.|those of my employer or any other
myers@fc.hp.com    Fort Collins, Colorado   |sentient life-form on this planet.
Xref: sparky rec.radio.amateur.misc:7330 rec.radio.swap:1152
From: koning@koning.enet.dec.com (Paul Koning)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Re: Direction finding antenna for 440mhz?
Date: 6 Apr 92 13:58:03 GMT
Reply-To: koning@koning.enet.dec.com
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Organization: Digital Equipment Co., distributed systems architecture


In article <1992Mar31.181437.25852@umesve.maine.edu>, deej@thrush.umesve.maine.edu (Dj Merrill) writes:
|>In article <fLdBTw7@quack.sac.ca.us>, bweaver@quack.sac.ca.us (Brian Weaver) writes:
|>|> Does anyone know who sells or has plans to built a 
|>|> simple direction finding loop for the 440 band?
|>|> I want something I can use mobile to DF weak signals
|>|> in the 440 mhz band. I've called AEA and HRO, but all
|>|> they had was a loop for 10m. Thanks for you help..
|>|> 
|>|> 
|>
|>And also for 2 meters??
|>
|>-- 
|>
|>+------------------------------+
|>|         Dj Merrill           |
|>| Systems and Network Manager  |
|>|  University of Maine NCGIA   |
|>|           N1JOV              |
|>| deej@grouse.umesve.maine.edu |
|>| deej@maine.maine.edu         |
|>+------------------------------+

Same answer for both:

Loop antennas are SMALL (much less than a wavelength) antennas, intended
for situations where normal size antennas aren't feasible.  For DF at
80 meters, for example, they are the obvious answer.

Conversely, at 2 meters or up, you can get the same antenna pattern more
cheaply and easily with a dipole!  And if you want to eliminate the 180 degree
ambiguity, which presumably you do, make it a small (3 element or so) Yagi.
You can build one strong and light enough for handheld use in a few hours
from hardware store stuff (brass rod/tube; plastic plumbing tube; etc).

	paul

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: template@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Template Account)
Subject: Re: Ramsey Elect. 2-meter amps
Reply-To: template@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Template Account)
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 01:52:17 GMT

In article <Apr.6.14.32.50.1992.12856@pilot.njin.net> furr@pilot.njin.net  
(Grover Furr) writes:
> 
> 	I've been thinking of getting the Ramsey PA-10 2m power amp,
> which advertises 10x power amplification. Ramsey also sells a kit, the
> PA-1, a power amp with 8x amplification. 
> 
> If anybody know anything about these amps -- either from experience,
> hearsay, or reviews (where? , please post the info. You could also
> e-mail it to me, but this might be of more general interest.

On the PA-1:
Well, I have one on order, so it should arrive this week. I have spoken to  
a few friends about the kit, and we are also interested on its  
performance. As soon as I get mine assembled, I will let you know. The  
word from the grapevine is that it is a nice piece of equipment, but this  
is all third hand.

N9OPG
Michael Brown
brownmd@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
From: jpp@ecl.psu.edu (Joseph P. Portelli (814) 238-7137)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Heathkit article in New York Times
Date: 13 Apr 92 09:03:44 EDT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Engineering Computer Lab, Pennsylvania State University

In article <1992Apr7.175345.14171@newstand.syr.edu>, rvenkate@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Ravi Venkatesh) writes:
> What about the HW101? The first time I helped assemble one, we did it
> without looking at the circuit diagram. Started at 10pm, and had the
> first contact about 7am. The set is still working, after 13(?) years.
> The only parts which needed replacement were the final tubes, after
> many years of service, and at higher than recommended voltages! The
                                                                  ^^^
> later models of the HW101 were solid-state by the way, except for the
  ^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^  ^^^^^^ ^^^ ^^^
> finals.
  ^^^^^^
> 
> Ravi

Uh...I don't think so.  I have one of the latest models, bought in about
'79 or '80.  It's got the full 19 tube complement.

-Joe Portelli, WA3YDC - Penn State University, Electronic Design Services
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: skora@bnlux1.bnl.gov (John G. Skora)
Subject: TS-450 extended xmit mod?
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 11:58:18 GMT

Hi.  Looking for the mod to give extended transmit range
to the Kenwood TS-450.

Tnx and 73!  -John-
From: brown@hpspkla.spk.hp.com (Pat R. Brown)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: How old is oldest diode???
Date: 6 Apr 92 19:52:28 GMT
Organization: Hewlett Packard Company, Spokane, Wa.

When was the first semiconductor diode marketed? I don't mean crystal 
detector or any of the other non-semiconductor detectors. I mean diode
in a package. 

The reason I ask is that I picked up a 1N22 from Western Electric
in the orignal package. It has the data Jan 16, 1945 stamped on 
the bottom of the box. 

Also are there any collectors of crystal sets and/or old detectors 
for crystal sets on the net? 

73 de Pat N7KRG
:wq
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: laz@cheetah.ece.clarkson.edu (Matt Parker - N2MGI)
Subject: Icom 3200 mods anybody?? 
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:56:22 GMT

Does anybody have mods for an Icom IC3200 mobile rig?
I would be interested in knowing what I can make this thing do.

Matt
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: jon@turing.acs.virginia.edu (Jon E. Gefaell (KD4CQY))
Subject: Re: Lambda Amateur Radio Club vs. the ARRL
Organization: The Turing Project, Charlottesville Virginia.
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 04:05:14 GMT

In article <9204160331.AA07579@dirt.cisco.com> faunt@cisco.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS 415-688-8269) writes:
>Does anyone out there have information abouth the complaint LARC filed
>against the ARRL, according to the new Oscar Satellite Report?
>There are several new hams around here who could make a decision to
>NOT join the ARRL around this issue.  
>I would be interested in hearing the ARRL's official word on this,
>also.
>

Interesting ... I have not heard of any such complaint. Can you give
more information when you get it? I notice that a Lambda Amateur Radio
Club advertises in each issue of '73, but I never see their adverts in QST.
When I saw the Subject header of the original message I thought it regarded
the ARRL possibly denying LARC advertising in our journal (I am a member.)

But, you say it's over an OSCAR satellite report? Could this be another
LARC? Tell us more when you know it. It could affect my decision to renew.
From: mab3474@zeus.tamu.edu (Myles Barkman-KG5AI Tx A&M Univ.)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: HTX-202 Mod Retraction
Date: 7 Apr 92 19:09:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <70920406162307.0004788818NA2EM@mcimail.com>, 0004788818@mcimail.com (Jeff L. Meyers) writes...
> [apologies removed]
Don't feel so bad.  Look what happened to the rest of the country.  They read
George Bush's lips and see what happened?  What you did was a service to 
the amateur community.  It opened a lot of people's eyes to scams and hoaxes.
You did not intend to be malicious.  On the surface, it looked legit.  I even
sent the post to my co-workers at Tandy in Fort Worth.  I work there during
the summer doing quality control.  I and a few others at Tandy got to test
some of the earlier samples of the radio before they were put into production.
We were all convinced that this was one radio that would not be modifiable as
far as expanded frequency coverage was concerned.  After I sent it, I was 
skeptical and thought I better read the entire article to the end.  Gee, it
was "too good to be true" all the things that could be done.  Then I got to
the part about removing several resistors and I started smiling.  It started
getting good when it talked about turning on the light when you transmit.
I hate reading mods for scanners that "expand 800 MHz coverage" when the
scanner doesn't even have the innards to receive that band.  I have learned
to spot most good and bad mods.  If people want to massacre their radios
because they don't have enough sense to figure these things out, then you
are providing a service by weeding them out.  How do you become a ham and then
turn around and think your radio will work better by taking half the 
components out?  There are a few ham radios out now that can be modified
to receive 800-950 MHz.  I'll be damned if I haven't already heard people
wondering if there are mods out that will let them talk on cellular phone
frequencies.  PLEASE!!!  Watch out for these "mods".  Don't be taken in so
easily.
******************************************************************************
* Namenet   : Myles Barkman   aka 'Scanman'             Texas A&M University *
* Hamnet    : KG5AI                                       College Station TX *
* Internet  : mab3474@venus.tamu.edu      RACES                              *
* Bitnet    : mab3474@tamvenus                ARES                           *
* Packetnet : kg5ai@w5ac.tx.usa.na               SKYWARN                     *
* ICBMnet   : 30.606 N 96.316 W           Where are all the tornadoes?       *
******************************************************************************
From: n9ljx@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Scott A Stembaugh)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: KP for Kenwood tr2600
Date: 16 Apr 92 22:27:55 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network

This is from rec.radio.swap....


In article <1992Apr16.205420.24072@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> djb@mailer.cc.fsu.edu (David Brightbill) writes:
>I'm trying to find a replacement keypad for a kenwood tr2600.  The
>unit is 8 years old but Kenwood no longer stocks this part.  Any
>hints as to a source would be welcome.  If anyone has a blown
>2600 that they want to sell for parts, I'd be interested in hearing
>about that too.
>
>Thanks, Dave KD4BTC 
>.



Looks like we better boycott Kenwood too!! :-) :-) :-)
--sas
-- 
Scott Stembaugh - N9LJX           internet: n9ljx@ecn.purdue.edu
Operations Supervisor, ADPC       phone:    317 494 7946 
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN 47907-1061
From: ron@pilot.njin.net (Ron)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Repeater Mapping Project (was: Repeater guide...)
Date: 7 Apr 92 19:39:58 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

> The #LINK field is for the callsign(s) of the repeaters linked to by this
> entry. 

Hopefully the frequency as well.  Unlike packet radio, there's no
unique correspondance between call letters and repeaters.  I've
got 4 repeaters under the call sign K4HTA.  2 on 440, one on 2m,
and 1 on 220.

-Ron
From: nagle@netcom.com (John Nagle)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: How old is oldest diode???
Date: 7 Apr 92 18:07:42 GMT
Article-I.D.: netcom.#+qjmsr.nagle
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

koning@koning.enet.dec.com (Paul Koning) writes:
>|>The reason I ask is that I picked up a 1N22 from Western Electric
>|>in the orignal package. It has the data Jan 16, 1945 stamped on 
>|>the bottom of the box. 

      Packaged diodes were used in WWII gear, and perhaps back to the
1930s.  

>I've seen CuO rectifiers from before WW2.  Come to think of it, I've
>seen a datasheet for a CuO FET from (I think) before WW2 -- French, 
>as far as I remember.  Just saw it once and remember very little about
>it... does this ring any bells anywhere else?

      A copper-oxide rectifier isn't a semiconductor device; the 
mechanism involves electrolysis, which is a slow chemical reaction.
That's why copper-oxide rectifiers won't work at audio, let alone RF,
frequencies.  I'd like to see a copper-oxide FET;  I can't offhand see
how that would be possible.

					John Nagle
From: adams@chuck.dallas.sgi.com (chuck adams)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: JT1JA
Date: 14 Apr 92 14:34:04 GMT
Article-I.D.: odin.1992Apr14.143404.27057
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

In article <336@beyonet.UUCP>, beyo@beyonet.UUCP (Steve Urich) writes:
|> 
|> 	Thats too bad :-(. Maybe some organization could collect enough
|> 	money to get 1000 cards madeup to send to JT1JA so he can send
|> 	them. Still people would need to send IRC's. Then you have to 
|> 	be one of the lucky guys that make it thru the postal system
|> 	there :-).
|> 
|> 	Steve
|> -- 
|>  ############### Stephen Urich WB3FTP |"Starlightbeams project ###############
|>  ##|_|########## Bensalem, PA  USA    |me in Red Blue and Green##|_|##########
|>  ###############----------------------|Velvetdreams protect me ###############
|>  ####       #### snark!beyonet!beyo   |when I hit the Screen"  ####       ####
|>  ##    |_|    ## widener!beyonet!beyo |--Alan Parsons Project  ##    |_|    ##
|>  ##           ##-----------------------------------------------##           ##
|>  ####       ####  Packet Radio: WB3FTP@WA3NWL.#SEPA.PA.USA.NA  ####       ####
|> _###############_______________________________________________###############_

Hold it gang!  Anyone heard of QSL manager?  Isn't this what this guy
needs in the old US of A?

73 and gd dx,

-- 


   Chuck Adams, Southern Education Center
   Silicon Graphics, Inc.
   15280 Addison Road, Suite 100
   Dallas, TX  75248

   (214) 788-0957 (fax)
   (214) 788-4122 (voice)
   
   K5FO @ 65wpm cw

   adams@sgi.com
   adams@relay.dallas.sgi.com
   adams@chuck.dallas.sgi.com

"Be a horn tooter, not a horn toter." - Sign in bandhall, Wink, TX.
From: wjc@ll.mit.edu (Bill Chiarchiaro)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Benton Harbor Lunch Box...Gonset
Date: 16 Apr 92 15:49:19 GMT
Article-I.D.: ll.1992Apr16.154919.16291
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington MA
Originator: wjc@ll.mit.edu (Bill Chiarchiaro)


In article <1992Apr15.211554.13553@odin.corp.sgi.com>, adams@chuck.dallas.sgi.com (chuck adams) writes:
|> 
|> trivia question.  who was the first US amateur to run 1KW mobile?
|> 


   Was it Don Wallace, W6AM?


Bill Chiarchiaro  N1CPK
wjc@ll.mit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc