HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lhurder@arrl.org (Luck Hurder KY1T)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: ARRL freebies
Date: 28 Jul 92 17:31:07 EST
Organization: American Radio Relay League


A reminder to all that the American Radio Relay League 
continues to make available to Amateur Radio Operators and 
non-amateurs alike a wide variety of free materials and 
services.  Of particular interest to the not-yet-licensed 
individual would be the ARRL Prospective Ham Package.  In 
the PHP, one would find:
.-
1.  Printouts of Volunteer Examination session 
opportunities  in his/her area.
.-
2.  Listings of Amateur Radio clubs in his location.
.-
3.  Helpful promotional material about the Amateur Radio 
Service.
.-
The already-licensed individual might well be interested 
in  another free ARRL publication, the ARRL Public Service 
Communications Manual. The PSCM represents the "bible" of 
public service communications, and clearly/concisely 
points  out how the ARRL National Traffic System and the 
ARRL  Amateur Radio Emergency Service function as a 
cohesive unit to provide the maximum support to the public 
both in times  of disaster as well as "normal" times.
.-
To obtain either of these free ARRL services, please 
provide  me with:
.-
A.  Your name
B.  Your mailing address
C.  A Specific request for either of the two services 
above.
.-
Best 73!
.-
Luck Hurder, KY1T
225 Main St.
Newington CT. 06111
203 666 1541


|       |   |         Deputy Manager, Field Services, ARRL.
|       |___|         The ARRL Amateur Radio Emergency Service, the ARRL
| uck   |   |urder    National Traffic System, The Amateur Auxiliary to
------  |   |         the FCC's Field Operations Bureau, the ARRL
     KY1T             Field Organization and the ARRL Monitoring System.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
lhurder@arrl.org   Prodigy - MGTS39A,  BIX - ARRL,
   MCI Mail - RPALM, MCI Mail - "ARRL HQ", America On Line - "ARRL HQ"
        Compuserve - 70007,3373 (ARRL HQ)  -- Genie ARRL.HQ
From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: "Bob" Says...
Date: 24 Jul 92 16:12:35 GMT
Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Gannett Technologies Group

In article <14570448@hpnmdla.sr.hp.com> alanb@hpnmdla.sr.hp.com (Alan Bloom) writes:
>In rec.radio.amateur.misc, William=E.=Newkirk%Pubs%GenAv.Mlb@ns14.cca.CR.rockwell.COM writes:
>
>>>Amateur radio is aging at an incredible rate as we are losing relevance to
>>>today's youth.  The recent attempts to do something about this seem to
>
>>well, people are living longer and most people tend to be amateur radio 
>>operators for the rest of their lives once they enter the program.  
>
>Right.  Think about it:  What if amateur radio was drawing new members 
>continuously, an equal percentage of each age group?  That is, .01%/yr
>of the 0-5 age group, .01% of the 6-10 year olds, .01% of 11-15, etc.
>etc.  In a few decades, the average age of the ham population would
>be much greater than the population at large.  Since most people keep
>their ham licenses indefinitely once they pass the test, we will always
>be older than the average.

The average age disparity between hams and the general population is
54 versus 34. Now your thought experiment is flawed because negligible
numbers are entering our ranks from the youngest cohorts, and because
hams, on average, don't live as long as the general population. You've
neglected to shrink the size of the older cohorts to account for death.
When you do that, and discard the lowest age cohort, the average age of 
hams should be 39. So hams are 15 years older than they should be if the 
popularity of ham radio wasn't sharply reduced among the teenage groups,
traditionally the cohort with the highest rate of joining ham radio.
We're an old white man's hobby, and we have been growing more so until
very recently. Since no code, the average age of hams has declined by
six months. That indicates that younger people are again joining more
rapidly than older people, or it could mean that the oldest hams are
reaching an age where they are dying rapidly. There is a demographic
bulge in our population curve from the rapid growth of the hobby in
earlier years, pre-1960s. Those people are approaching death in increasing 
numbers.

Gary KE4ZV
From: dube@cpdvax.CSc.ti.COM
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: amateurs in history
Date: 22 Jul 1992 11:26:36 -0700
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu


Actually, it was HAM and SHEM.  But they didn't work such an advanced
mode as CW.  They worked voice on a local repeater network:  two cans 
connected via a string...   :-)

Dube      AB5AP            <dube@cpdvax.csc.ti.com>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: mont@netcom.com (Mont Pierce)
Subject: Alinco Manuals
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 92 07:23:11 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)

Jay, I would like to be placed on your list for the Alinco's.  I have a
DJ-160.

BTW If I had your email address I woulda used it... 
    Care to post it for others who want to be on your list?

Thanks & 73,
-- 
Mont Pierce

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ham Call: KM6WT             Internet:  mont@netcom.com                  |
|    bands: 80/40/20/2        IBM vnet:  mont@vnet.ibm.com                |
|    modes: cw,ssb,fm                                                     |
|      qth: Fremont, CA       Religion:  Jehovah's Witnesses    9/72      |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: ron@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Ron Miller)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:31:39 GMT
Subject: Re: Re: Re:Thread to ham radio (to Ron MIller)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc

Referral information

rec.motorcycles under the title "Deer Claims Another; Some Thoughts"

Comments on the ham radio portion  of my posting belong here.

Helmet law diatribes belong elsewhere.

We don't seem to have a usenet group for remedial reading........

Ron
From: kanekawa@oahu.cs.ucla.edu (Nobuyasu Kanekawa)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Do vertical antennas cause more TVIs ?
Date: 30 Jul 92 17:24:59 GMT
Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department


Hi, Everybody !

I read "Vertical Antenna Handbook", by Capt. Paul H. Lee,
CQ Publishing Inc.  The author says "vertical antenna does 
not cause more TVI and BCI than horizontal antenna" in his
book in p.126. 

Is it true ?

I think vertical polarization wave causes more common-mode
interference voltage in TV antenna feeder.

  __  __     __                      _
 /  )/  )   /  )  /                 /_)
(  /   /   (  /__/ _    _  _       /   _          _
  /   /      /\   / )  / )/ ) (>  /_> / )  / / / / )
 /   (__/ * /  \__\/(_/ /  (__/\_/\__(_/(_(_(_(__\/(_
   (Email in Japan : kanekawa@hrl.hitachi.co.jp)
	                      JG1TQI
# There are two kinds in pretty wild drinking parties.
# One is never forgettable, and another is never rememberable.
From: charles@greyrock.mso.colostate.edu (Charles H. Hemstreet IV)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Another Morse Code program for the Macintosh
Date: 21 Jul 92 21:58:59 GMT
Organization: Colorado State University


Great job on the program description!

There are also two programs called "Morse Code Tutor" and "Morse".  I
believe that they can be found at ohio state.  I also believe that
they are free or at worst shareware.  I have tried them out a couple
of times but decided to go the quick and dirty no-code route.  If you
have trouble finding them, let me know.

Charles

--
!===========================================================================!
! Charles H. Hemstreet IV   ! internet:  charles@greyrock.MSO.ColoState.Edu !
! Colorado State University ! NeXTMail: nmhemstr@greyrock.MSO.ColoState.Edu !
!                            Computer Consultant                            !
!===========================================================================!
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: chuckb@babbage.csus.edu (Chuck Bland)
Subject: Want missing pages
Organization: California State University, Sacramento
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 92 16:41:53 GMT


I have a 1964 ARRL Antenna Book. It has blue on the cover.

Well, the index stops at "Selective Fading". The rest of the page(s)
are missing.

Does someone have this book that would xerox the last pages of the index
and send them to me ?

Chuck Bland - N6DBT
9000 Leatham Ave
Fair Oaks, CA  95628
--
My sig file
From: rusty@anasaz (Rusty Carruth)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: UU-Net on 10M Still Active?
Date: 10 Jul 92 18:55:23 GMT
Organization: Anasazi, Inc.  Phoenix, Az

In article <1992Jul6.203008.10816@chinet.chi.il.us> megabyte@chinet.chi.il.us (Dr. Megabyte) writes:
>I seem to remember seeing before I got my ticket somethng about a net of
>USENET users on 10 meters on Saturdays.  Is that still active?
>Freq & Time?

I've been somewhat busy and thus not around for the event, but I'm
going to make an effort to be on tomorrow (July 11) AND next week
(July 18). 

Time and place (as summarized in my .sig):

	1700 UTC until about 1900 UTC  Saturdays 

	I generally try to hang out at either 28.410 or 28.390 - back
when the sunspots were hot (pun :-), we had to worry about qrm.  I
doubt that will be much of a problem these days, but just in case
it is a good idea to scan 5 to 10 KHz on either side of the two
"primary" frequencies above (i.e., look from 28.380 to 28.420, but
I really try to stick around 410 or 390).

73 de Rusty Carruth, N7IKQ   P.O. Box 27001, Tempe, AZ 85285
      (602) 870-3330         !'s:{ames!ncar!noao!asuvax,mcdphx}!anasaz!rusty
@'s: rusty@anasazi.com       LastResort: rusty%anasaz.UUCP@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
Join the Usenet Un-Net:      1700-1900Z  Saturdays, 28.410 or 28.390 MHz
EEK! The 1992 Summer Callsign Project lives! Details: Fred.Lloyd@West.Sun.COM


-- 
73 de Rusty Carruth, N7IKQ   P.O. Box 27001, Tempe, AZ 85285
      (602) 870-3330         !'s:{ames!ncar!noao!asuvax,mcdphx}!anasaz!rusty
@'s: rusty@anasazi.com       LastResort: rusty%anasaz.UUCP@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
Join the Usenet Un-Net:      1700-1900Z  Saturdays, 28.410 or 28.390 MHz
EEK! The 1992 Summer Callsign Project lives! Details: Fred.Lloyd@West.Sun.COM
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.cb
From: nomad@ecst.csuchico.edu (Michael Larish)
Subject: Re: Comp.dcom.telecom Moderator attacks ham radio
Organization: California State University, Chico
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 08:11:36 GMT

In article <pschleck.712155883@cwis> pschleck@cwis.unomaha.edu (Paul W Schleck KD3FU) writes:
>mike@hernix.org (Mike Herman) writes:
>
>>In several respects I agree!  I've heard some incredible things over
>>the years on 2 meter repeaters.  I've heard deliberate jamming on 75 meter
>>SSB.  I've seen some crooks in action at hamfests, etc.  No matter what
>>large group of people you find in life, there are always going to be a
>>few bad apples.  I think you're blowing it out of proportion.  However,
>>due to the amount of knuckleheads I've found on 2 meters around here, I no longer talk on any of the local 2 meter repeaters.
>>73 de wb8evi
>
>I'm sorry your current experiences on amateur radio are so
>disappointing, Mike, but it does beg the following question.  What are
>you doing in your community to bring up model hams and set good examples
>on the air, driving out the bad operators?  Shutting off your radio will
>remove the bad operating practices from your mind, but not from the air.
>Silent resignation to the way things are on the ham bands will not make
>our hobby any better, only much worse, and will leave ourselves open to
>criticisms like those given by the comp.dcom.telecom moderator.
>
>73, Paul W. Schleck, KD3FU
>
>pschleck@unomaha.edu

	I agree with Paul.  People who are abusing radio whether it be
amateur radio, cb or whatever need to be educated in it's proper use, rules
and regulations.  If they don't follow them, they need to be found and
removed (legally of course  :-).

	Besides that, the original statement made by Pat as well as yours
smell of stereotyping.  Yes, I've been in areas such as the San Francisco
Bay Area where there are obnoxious 2m users breaking every rule and regulation
made.  I remember scanning through a bunch of repeaters in Fremont on my
way out of the Bay Area heading back to Chico when I heard a repeater playing
music for quite a while.  People were cussing on it, etc.

	However, other areas such as where I live (ie Chico, Ca) have, for
the most part, a very nice, educated, polite group of amateurs who do credit
to amateur radio.  And I might note that many of these individuals came from
the ranks of CBers.

-- 
Michael G. Larish       | Amateur Radio Callsign:  KD6CTZ
aka Nomad the Wanderer  | Golden Empire Amateur Radio Society (GEARS) - W6RHC
nomad@ecst.csuchico.edu | Chico State Amateur Radio Society (CSARS)
CSU Chico, CA           | rram FAQ Maintainer email: hamradio-faq@uts.amdahl.com
From: n4hy@idacrd.UUCP (Bob McGwier)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Calcium ;-(
Keywords: Mettalic
Date: 23 Jul 92 14:51:54 GMT
Organization: idacrd, princeton, nj

Okay Okay so I am not a chemist.  I suspose like most I am too used to
seeing limestone to think of it as metallic.

My question stills stands, is there a book like the GE Nicad book for these
cells.

Bob
From: flloyd@sunburn.West.Sun.COM (Fred Lloyd [Phoenix SE])
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Callsign Tapes Now Available
Date: 23 Jul 92 00:23:40 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Phoenix, AZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: sunburn.west.sun.com


	       * * * Callsign Project Update * * *
	       * * * THE TAPES HAVE ARRIVED! * * * 

After much waiting and anticipation, the Summer update of the callsign
database is IN.  The latest dump contains 568023 entries in 54
Megabytes of data.  Our recent aquisition has enabled us to offer the
most up-to-date copy of this information available.

We're currently in the process of making copies of the database for
all those interested.  Due to aquisition costs, we must ask for a $20
contribution for each copy made.  In addition, those ordering copies
must supply the media (tape) and pay for shipping both ways.

The preferred tape format is the QIC-150, 150 megabyte quarter inch 
cartridge.  We can also write Exabyte 8mm, QIC-24, and 1/2 inch/9track
tapes.  TAR format will be used unless otherwise specified.  (We can
also do dd if all you want is the raw data, e.g. no programs).

In addition to the callsign database, which is a 54 megabyte flat file,
we'll also be supplying 'C' source code which does creates indices
and performs fast (bsearch) lookups based on callsign or name.

Source to a complete, working callsign server program is included.
All source code was developed on a Sun, and is ANSI-C compliant.

If you'd like a copy of the complete package, here's what you shoud do:

1. Prepare a self-addressed and postage prepaid return mailer containing
your blank QIC-150 (preferred) tape.

2. Enclose a note indicating your name, address and any special 
handling or formatting instructions.  Please also include your e-mail
address if you want e-mail confirmation of your order.

3. Enclose a check for $20 payable to Fred Lloyd

4. Package the above and send (mail, UPS, or FedEx) to:

	Fred Lloyd, AA7BQ
	8215 E. Wood Drive
	Scottsdale, AZ  85260

We have had excellent results with first class mail, and it is
very convenient for us to use.

If your tape is QIC_150 and TAR format, it will be processed within
2 days of our receiving it.  Other formats will be processed ASAP,
with Exabyte being the next best.  9track 1/2 inch tapes take a little
more time.

Thanks,

-fred

-- 
| Fred Lloyd  AA7BQ,  Systems Engineer          Fred.Lloyd@west.sun.com |
| Sun Microsystems Computer Corporation                   ...sun!flloyd |
| Phoenix, AZ    (If it's a fact, I believe it!)         (602) 275-4242 |
From: jfw@ksr.com (John F. Woods)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Calling the FCC
Date: 22 Jul 92 11:02:57 EDT
Distribution: na

m14494@mwvm.mitre.org (Mike White) writes:
>A number of hams sent me email asserting very, ahem, Vigorously that 
>calling the FCC for a rules interpretation is a Real Bad Idea.

The FCC thinks this is poor practice, too, you will note.

>There's more to patriotism than 
>just waving the flag on the 4th of July; in part it's buying into the 
>system, and working within it.  If you think a regulation is wrong, or 
>unrealistic, or whatever, the right thing to do is work to change it, not 
>to ignore it or disobey it, hoping that the Government won't notice.

So, if you think that a regulation is wrong, the solution is to "work within
the system to change it", i.e. draft a formal request for a rules change, have
a lawyer well-versed in the appropriate laws and regulations look it over, and
formally submit it to the FCC (be sure to include plenty of well-reasoned
arguments).  You don't call them on the phone and say "well, is it like OK to
do this?" because they have neither the time nor motivation to research it
carefully, and will answer conservatively.  And once they answer the same
question conservatively several times, there will come into being a
bureaucratic inertia that will turn the offhand conservative answer into
enforced policy.

That's the point.

Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 10:36:49 -0400 
From: Bill_Chiles@transarc.com
Subject: Commodore 64 Query/Offering

I happened upon a Commodore 64 (processor in the keyboard sort of thing),
monitor, Vic disk drive, etc., in the closet of a relative who bought it and
never used it.  It appears to work, runs diagnostics and whatnot, and I'm
told some people still know how to use these and play with them.  I could
barely stand to try to use it.  Does anyone actually use these anymore?

I'm told these things have a going rate of $150 with a working drive.  I'm
incredulous.  If anyone is interested in this computer or knows anyone who
might be, I'd be VERY reasonable on the price and would ship it.  If you
demonstrate that you represent a club for kids (other than Boy Scouts of
USA) or some other social service, the cost of my hassle for shipping this
to you will be even more reasonable.  I'd really hate to just throw this
thing into some land fill, but I can't even find a local hardware/tinkering
junkie to take it.

Bill

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: dave@hp1.uucp (David Vrona)
Subject: Re: ARRL Bulletin 68 ARLB068
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 18:04:14 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Hollister Incorporated,  Libertyville, IL

In article <paulf.711670309@w6yx> paulf@w6yx (Paul Flaherty) writes:
>
>Instead of responding to this line - by - line, I think that I'll let this
>article stand as a beautiful example of self - parody.  :-)
>
>--
>-=Paul Flaherty, N9FZX/5W1JX  |"Anyway, nothing can beat Good Old American
>->paulf@Stanford.EDU          | Know - How." -- Harry Canyon, _Heavy Metal_
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Not this guy again!  If any of you are getting sick of this guy's crap like I
am, just put the following line in your rn KILL file:

/From: *paulf@w6yx/h:j

This will make reading rec.radio.amateur.misc much more pleasant.
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
\  David Vrona  708.680.2829              <dave@hp1.holl.com>                /
/  Hollister Incorporated                 {well connected}!ddsw1!hp1!dave    \
\  2000 Hollister Drive               Opinions expressed are my own and not  /
/  Libertyville, IL  60048-3781       those of Hollister Incorporated.       \
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: root@umiacs.umd.edu (The Golf Pro)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Olympics and hams...
Date: 29 Jul 92 18:04:43 GMT
Organization: UMIACS, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742

I hope i'm not behind the times with this.  I just had to "catch up", there
was to many new articles to read.

Anyway..  Is there anyone that is broadcasting the Olympics live or 
otherwise?  It's probably not legal so the answer to my question is most
likely no, but I thought I would try anyway.
 
Thanks,
Pierce
From: bsplaine@mtmtl8.sr.hp.com (Bill Splaine)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Help- QRP Xcvr Choices
Date: 24 Jul 92 14:14:11 GMT
Organization: HP Santa Rosa Site (NMD MTA MWTD)

I am interested in becoming initiated into the ranks of QRP.  My TS 440 will
probably throttle down to 5watts, however, it won't fit into my backpack.

I've looked at some of the articles and advertisements for the A&A kits,
Ramsey kits and the MFJ 20m rig.  The MFJ, despite some of the comments I've
heard about the company (M&$%#$ F**%&L Junk) sounds like it has promise.
The latest 73 mag did a review that indicated some changes will be in the
offing with this new rig.

Before I leap into the foray, I would like to hear your comments, both good
and bad about any/all of the above.  Thanks for your time and input.

73 de Bill, N6GHG
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: csjos@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (John Stafford)
Subject: Re: Re: New Radio Shack Scanner (BOGUS!).  What we really want. . .!
Organization: Educational Computing Network
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 18:46:45 GMT

I wish just for once these companys like tandy would ask the consumer
what they want in a scanner instead of tring to push the same old SHIT
as equipment with new features
.

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: <tonyp@cnvxla.COM> (good, Conan - good!)
Subject: Re: tough life?
Keywords: never
Reply-To: tonyp@convex.COM 
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 16:27:41 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In article <982@vk2bea.UUCP> michael@vk2bea.UUCP (Michael G. Katzmann) writes:
}In article <76540@ut-emx.uucp> oo7@ut-emx.uucp (Derek Wills) whinges:
} >tonyp@convex.com (honey bunny) complains:
} >
} >>You say you've got it tough?
} >
} >>When I was a novice, we didn't have telegraph keys;
} >
} >Light switches?  Looxury, lad, looxury!   We had to get up at 6 a.m. 
} >and carve cats' whiskers out of blocks of galena.  
}
}Galena? You had galena ?!?  We had to use real cats!
}
So, what you're saying is you were *actually* using Morris Code?
[Or, would that be Morse Cat?]

--
Tony J. Podrasky |  What's this thing?
 San Diego , Ca   |  It's called a MODEM.
tonyp@convex.com |  And what's this button for? 
 NNNN NNNN ZCZC   |  Whatever you do, don't touc{{{7bh6xx!{@%%hxbd&$#)$% NO CARRIER
From: jdelancy@tecnet1.jcte.jcs.mil
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: [ANS] Reciprocal Licences in the U.K
Date: 24 Jul 92 01:24:10 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

>In other words UK class B > US technician hence no reciprocity. 
>
Not so sure that's correct.  Talk to N3KIP (aka G8VUK) in Waldorf
Maryland.  He came over with the British verison of a no-code
and had recip previliges BEFORE the FCC came out with the no-code
ticket.

BTW, G8VUK went from no U.S. license to Extra class in less than
a year..
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: bedaj00@DMI.USherb.CA (JOEL BEDARD)
Subject: Icom battery problem
Organization: Universite de Sherbrooke -- departement de Mathematiques et d'Informatique
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 13:12:46 GMT



Hi!

   I just buy a old Icom 2AT gear and i got a question:

   I got with it a BC-30 charger, BP-5 and a BP-8.

   How many time that should i charge each battery?
   There are two leds ( Pwr et chg ),
   does the light chg shutdown when the battery is full charge?

   Thank you again,

        Joel

   Answer at:    bedaj00@dmi.usherb.ca


-- 
==============================================================================
=  Joel Bedard                - Internet :            bedaj00@dmi.usherb.ca  =
=  Promotion   MaXXIImus      -                 bl108@cleveland.freenet.edu  =
=  Universite de Sherbrooke   - Bitnet : bl108%cleveland.freenet.edu@cunyvm  =