From: U19807@uicvm.uic.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.industrial
Subject: Re: Test Dept discography
Date: 12 Aug 92 19:35:41 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago

In article <1992Aug12.045132.24988@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>,
bp271@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Matthew N. Sharp) says:
>
>Chris Krolczyk, (u19807@uicvm.uic.edu) writes:
>(in reference to my indirect commentary on Mason Jones' posting habits)
>>Ever get the feeling that some people,if given the choice to be stupid in
>>public or quit while they're ahead,would choose to remain stupid because they
>>prefer public ridicule to the obscurity they truly deserve?

>Yes, Chris, I do.
>Do you?  You should.
>Did you simply _not_understand_ what I did,
>or have they taught you very little at U of I at C?

Shucks,Matt,you should know better. I didn't have to learn how to spot an
idiot at UIC,just as you apparently didn't have to learn how to become one
when you were at Purdue.

FYI,Matty-baby,what you did or did not do is scarcely the point. The point,in
fact,is that you continue to hang aroung this list,wasting your time and ours,
doing nothing but flaming other people's musical tastes due to their failure
to measure up to your ever-Olympian standards.

>Here, let me explain;
>        1. Chris T. asked a question about the TD and D. Galas
>           collaborative recording, which is perfectly reasonable.
>
>        2. Mason Jones, man with many wonderful and famous friends,
>           posted a message saying that he did not have any information
>           on such a recording.

>It is questionable whether or not Mason Jones should have even
>bothered to send an _email_ message telling Christopher that he
>had no clue, and it is inane for him to have posted a message
>to the entire net exclaiming his lack of knowledge on said subject.

So? Do you suppose that your flames to this list represent much of an improve-
ment regarding the question of "inanity"? Hardly.

>Perhaps we _all_ should respond to every question we don't know
>the answer to with a statement informing every one else of our
>lack of ability to help.

Perhaps you should realize,dear sir,that the readers of this list could hardly
give a rat's ass as to your supposed standards of what constitutes or does not
constitute a proper channel of communication of replies to netnews posts.

Perhaps Mason was assuming that other people were interested,for whatever
reasons. It could also be assumed that Mason is not particularly concerned
about mentally unbalanced pedants such as yourself posting _ad_hoc_ flames
whenever he happens to reply to a question on r.m.i.

It could also be safely stated that you have a serious problem. Perhaps Lithium
would help?

>Get it, Chris "esq." Krolczyk?

Get this,clown. Your insipid little exercises in intellectual one-upmanship
are starting to bore me. It was quite amusing for a while (after all, baiting
smug,egocentric idiots is good,clean fun-for a while,at least),but seeing as
you need as much help in dealing with the outside world as possible,I refuse
to feed your little hate-quotient from now on. Do something about your
emotional problems,Matthew. Talk to a therapist. Drink less coffee. Post to a
list that truly enjoys hearing from spiteful toads who engage in flaming to
salve their deeper emotional wounds. Just don't post _here_,as posters on
r.m.i. could scarcely give a damn about your alleged "opinions".

>Hmmm... maybe if I subtracted the vowels...

You sure have room to talk about other people's deficiencies when you post
non-sequitors like this,don't you?

      ** Chris Krolczyk,esq.  * DISCLAIMER: My opinions are in **
      ** Maniac-at-Large      * no way endorsed by the Univer- **
      ** U19807@UICVM.BITNET  * sity of Illinois at Chicago.   **
      ** u19807@uicvm.uic.edu * So there. Nyaah.               **