HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: neese@adaptx1.UUCP (Roy Neese)
Subject: Re: SCO unix 3.2.4 and adaptec 1542
Organization: Adaptec Inc., Texas
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 14:49:21 GMT

In article <1992Aug15.163028.789@saans.north.de> rolf@saans.north.de (Rolf Nerstheimer) writes:
> on sco unix 3.2.4 the adaptec 1542 runs fine with the default jumpers.
> However I have to change the interrupt from 11 to 10, because 11 is
> ( unchangeable ) in use already. How can I reconfigure the ad-driver ?
> mkdev .scsi didn't do the trick !

Edit the /etc/conf/sdevice.d/ad file (I forget the exact name of the
driver) and change the 6th field from 11 to 10.  Relink the kernel, copy
the old kernel to some other name and then copy the new kernel to the
root directory.  Shutdown the system, change the interrupt on the 1542B
to 10 and reboot.  Should work just fine.
---

			Roy Neese
			Adaptec Senior UNIX/SCSI Software Engineer
			UUCP:	convex!egsner!adaptex!neese
			Inet:	neese%adaptex@cirr.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: a_sonnenberg@uvmvax.uvm.edu
Subject: HELP: internal modem
Organization: University of Vermont
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 22:34:07 GMT

I have a supra 2400 plus internal modem and can't figure out how to
set it up as a device.  Can anyone help me?
I have a 386dx, system V unix, and I'm trying to set it up with face.

Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.misc,connect.audit
From: dan@dribble.c-mols.siu.edu (Dan Ellison)
Subject: Re: Help - where can I get the lp-daemon for SCO-3.2v2?
Organization: Southern Illinois University - Carbondale, IL (SIU-C)
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 12:09:48 GMT

In <Bt4uxp.D2z@ibmpcug.co.uk> object@ibmpcug.co.uk (Ken Tough) writes:


>We have got SCO UNIX version 3.2v2 (on a '486 machine), along with
>SCO TCP/IP 1.1.3 (runtime and development).  Unfortunately, none
>of these included the lpd printer daemon which reads from the net
>and spools.   Where can we get hold of this?  Can someone supply
>some C program which we can port?  If this isn't included as 
>standard, what did everyone else do?

I have ported the Berkeley lpd/lpr suite to SCO and it is available
for anonymous ftp on dribble.c-mols.siu.edu in the sco-ports
directory.  Both source and binaries are there.  I use these
programs every day and they work quite well.  I modified the
source to allow either direct access to the print device or
passing the job to SCO's lp spooler for actual printing.

Help yourself!

>(I know that TCP/IP 1.2.0 will include the daemon, but that won't
>be available for a little while yet, and we would also have to 
>upgrade our UNIX to run it.)

>Thanks for any help,
>Ken
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Dan Ellison, Network Team 	  -    	Computing Affairs, SIU-C 	| 
| Southern Illinois University 	  - 	Carbondale, IL 62901            |   
| FAX:      (618) 453-3459        -   	PHONE:    (618) 453-6149 	|     
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser)
Subject: Re: FAS 2.10 async driver, part 5/5
Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix  (508) 655-3848
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 16:20:16 GMT

jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes:
>jerry@incc.com (Jerry Rocteur) writes:
>>Who is the irresponsible bastard who posts large files in a non source
>>newsgroup.
>The ruling is you should shut that hole beneath your nose, unplug your
>modem (or whatever) from your newsfeed, degauss your news partition 

The ironic part is that the flames he's generated (and will generate for months
to come :-) will probably in themselves far outweigh the size of Uwe's 
posting!

As someone else said ... Uwe's post _IS_ pertinent to this group!

Thanks, Uwe, for the software to make our intel boxes usable, and for 
your continued support!

-- 
bill@unixland.natick.ma.us                      ESIX Mailing List Moderator
Public Access UNIX/USENET/E-MAIL!  UUCP Accounts Available!  (508) 655-3848
5 lines  -  Located in Natick, MA   USA    Supporting V.32/PEP/V.42bis, etc.
From: merlin@neuro.usc.edu (merlin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: AT&T client printing to postscript printer on BSD server
Date: 23 Aug 1992 05:58:16 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: neuro.usc.edu

I know this has been discussed recently in this newsgroup -- could someone
drop me a brief note about how to set up SCO UNIX SYSV 386 3.2r2.0 ODT 1.1
to print (in place of a default printer) via ethernet to a SUN based Apple
Postscript printer?

Also, does anyone have nntp binaries for ethernet based news posting from
an SCO UNIX SYSV 386 3.2r2.0 ODT 1.1 system?

Thanks, Merlin
                              Don't let it be forgot
The Magician                  That there once was a spot
King Arthur's Court           For one brief shining moment
Camelot                       That was known as Camelot
From: Paul N. Prokopenko  <pasha@glas.apc.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Date: 16 Aug 92 17:37 MDT
Subject: ISC 3.0 telnet vs rlogin
Nf-ID: #N:glas:10200006:000:566
Nf-From: glas.UUCP!pasha    Aug 16 17:37:00 1992


	Hi!
	I'm running ISC 3.0 on i386. TCP/IP 1.3. and have a problem with
	telnet , while rlogin, rcp, rsh work fine.

What are telnet's extra requirements in comparison with rlogin?
Below is what I have after an attempt after an telnet attempt:

>glas-369>telnet glas2
>Trying...
>Connected to glas2.igc.org.
>Escape character is '^]'.
>
>
>System V UNIX (glas2)
>
>Connection closed by foreign host.
>glas-370>

Interesting note: If I run 'telnet' under emacs's shell it works!

------------------------------------------
Prokopenko Pavel, GlasNet
pasha@glas.apc.org
From: pcg@aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Dell SVR4 (and Dell hardware)
Date: 20 Aug 92 16:04:44 GMT
	<1992Aug16.160841.5501@bluemoon.rn.com>
	<1992Aug17.115713.1131@dlpinc00.rn.com> <Bt4t2s.M1C@gator.rn.com>
Reply-To: pcg@aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi)
Organization: Prifysgol Cymru, Aberystwyth

On 17 Aug 92 14:18:28 GMT, larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) said:

larry> The ATI ultra and Dell SVR4 will give most sparcstations a run
larry> for the money -- as a matter of fact, if you compare dollar per
larry> dollar, a ESIA 486/50 fully loaded will shine over most sparcs

Even a suitably, and not fully loaded, configured 486/33 ISA machine
will compete well with a SPARC.

But, to recognize the weaknesses and strengths of different lines, all
Intel floating point implementations, including the 486 one, are losers,
even with compilers tuned to its architecture. After all it was Intel
who started speaking about 'integer' SPECmarks, because the x87
'floating' SPECmarks were so poor that they dragged down the overall
SPECmark index.

It's just a small matter of cycle counts. Indeed one of the (rumoured)
major advances in the 586 is that it will have a competitive floating
point implementation.

Among RISC machines, current SPARC floating point implementations, while
being surely far more efficient than any x87, are actually the slowest.

A MIPS Magnum entry level machine with the R3000 floating point
coprocessor is quite a bit faster, and if I remember well it is quite
competitive with a SPARC entry level. Other fast floating point entry
levels are the HP 710 and the smaller Aviions.

Or one can get an AMD29K PC-ISA motherboard (if one can find the Unix
for it), or one of the quite effective RISC plug in cards for ISA PCs.
--
Piercarlo Grandi                   | JNET: pcg@uk.ac.aber
Dept of CS, University of Wales    | UUCP: ...!mcsun!ukc!aber-cs!pcg
Penglais, Aberystwyth SY23 3BZ, UK | INET: pcg@aber.ac.uk
From: rolf@saans.north.de (Rolf Nerstheimer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: SCO unix 3.2.4 and adaptec 1542
Date: 15 Aug 92 16:30:28 GMT
Article-I.D.: saans.1992Aug15.163028.789
Organization: a private node

Hi everybody,

on sco unix 3.2.4 the adaptec 1542 runs fine with the default jumpers.
However I have to change the interrupt from 11 to 10, because 11 is
( unchangeable ) in use already. How can I reconfigure the ad-driver ?
mkdev .scsi didn't do the trick !

Hoping for help,

Rolf

-- 
Rolf Nerstheimer, Surwisch 20, 2856 Sandstedt, Germany   | a private 
E-Mail: rolf@saans.north.de    Voice: +49 4702 1285      |   node           
"Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it
were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic." Lewis Carroll
From: jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: FAS 2.10 async driver, part 5/5
Date: 18 Aug 92 07:55:43 GMT
Organization: Dixie Communications Public Access.  The Mouth of the South.

jerry@incc.com (Jerry Rocteur) writes:

>In article <F5557UC@geminix.in-berlin.de>, gemini@geminix.in-berlin.de (Uwe Doering) writes:
>> Submitted-by: gemini@geminix.in-berlin.de
>> Archive-name: fas210/part05
>> 
>> #!/bin/sh
>> # this is fas210.05 (part 5 of fas210)

>Who is the irresponsible bastard who posts large files in a non source
>newsgroup.

>I have to pay for my news, plus I have to pay for the US-Europe phone
>call and I am not impressed having to pay to get this crap.

>What is the ruling regarding posting large files like this?

The ruling is you should shut that hole beneath your nose, unplug your
modem (or whatever) from your newsfeed, degauss your news partition 
and get the hell off the net.  You obviously don't have the good sense
to keep your mouth shut nor to allocate sufficient resources toward
running a news site.

To Uwe:  Thank you very much for posting here.  Your work is much 
appreciated, as is being able to partake of your work without prowling
around at some FTP site.

John
-- 
John De Armond, WD4OQC               |Interested in high performance mobility?  
Performance Engineering Magazine (TM) |
Marietta, Ga                         |Interested in high tech and computers? 
jgd@dixie.com                        |Write me about PE Magazine
Need Usenet public Access in Atlanta?  Write Me for info on Dixie.com.
From: rvdp@sow.econ.vu.nl (Ronald van der Pol)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Dell SVR4: no SCSI support for Exabyte and/or CDROM?
Date: 20 Aug 92 08:34:57 GMT
Organization: SOW-VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

kdenning@portal.hq.videocart.com (Karl Denninger) writes:

>In article <rvdp.714220940@yam.sow.econ.vu.nl> rvdp@sow.econ.vu.nl (Ronald van der Pol) writes:
>>
>>It looks like Dell SVR4 (Issue 2.1) does *not* support the SCSI
>>Exabyte 8200 and does *not* support CDROM.
>>When using the non-rewinding device with the Exabyte we get
>>I/O-errors. Also only 32k block writes seem to be supported.
>>
>>How many of you use SCSI systems (we have a SCSI-only system).
>>Do you want support for DAT/Exabyte/CDROM? How about other
>>vendors, do they support the above? Are there any third party
>>SCSI drivers and/or CDROM support (including all utilities and
>>filesystems)?

>That's funny, we use an Exabyte here on an Intel machine with DELL SVR4
>issue 2.1 and it seems to work just fine..... (and we do multiple save-set
>backups).

Oops, my fault. It is when we use a *rewinding* device that we get
I/O-errors. How about that? Do you know what PROM revision your
Exabyte has. Ours has "firmware 2618". Do you use ufsdump/ufsrestore 
or something else for your backups. What blocksize do you use?

--
Ronald van der Pol
rvdp@sow.econ.vu.nl
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: slangley@constant.demon.co.uk (Simon Langley)
Subject: Re: DELL: where g++ headers and libs?
Organization: Home
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 21:22:22 GMT

Bernd Melchers (melchers@Chico.Chemie.FU-Berlin.DE) wrote:
: I just compiled gcc and g++ (2.2.2) without any problems on our
: Dell Unix SVR4 I2.1 system. But to use g++ , i need the headerfiles
: (iostream.h,...). Where can i get them? Does i also need a special
: c++ library or can i use the c-libraries coming with dell?
: Thanks for any help for a c++-beginner --- Bernd
: 
What you need is libg++-2.2.tar.Z.  This is the g++ library and the
distribution contains the include files you need.

-- 
   Simon Langley                   (preferred)   slangley@constant.demon.co.uk
   Hampstead, London                             slangley@cix.compulink.co.uk
From: bae4310@dcrb.dla.mil (Robert Tobin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Avoiding the "8/16 Bit Problem"
Date: 20 Aug 92 10:40:45 GMT
Organization: Defense Contract Administration Services Region, Boston, MA

From article <18392@polstra.UUCP>, by jdp@polstra.UUCP (John Polstra):

> there is a potential problem in an ISA machine when you have both an
> 8-bit and a 16-bit card in the same 128K block of the address space.]
> 
> My question is, are the following cards 8-bit or 16-bit?
> 
>     Orchid ProDesigner IIs video controller
>     BusTek 542 SCSI controller (an Adaptec 1542 clone)
> 
> Thanks.
> -- 
>    John Polstra               polstra!jdp@uunet.uu.net
>    Polstra & Co., Inc.           ...!uunet!polstra!jdp
>    Seattle, Washington USA              (206) 932-6482
>    "Self-knowledge is always bad news."  -- John Barth

--------------------------------------------------------
John,
on a good majority of cards, the manufacturers are not smart enough
to pretend they are 16 bit when they are in fact only 8 bit.  This is 
also true between pretending they are 32 bit when they are really only
16 bit....   This is quite clear when looking at the edge connector on 
typical AT (16 bit) cards.  If the card is really 8 bit, then the 
portion of the edge connector which resides in the expanded portion of
the board slot (the 16 bit portion) will only have the gold plated
finger lands with NO lands mapped to any physical IC, resistor, etc...
on the board.   I don't have an ISA/EISA. I have a MCA bus... But it is
even true on MCA type edge connector/cards. (Visible).  I think this
would be true for your situation also!  I have also noticed that on some
boards where the manufacturer offers both a 8/16 bit card for the same
type of product, that the screen print and or serial number masked onto
the board will clearly identify it as either 8/16/32 bit, etc...

If all else fails, call the manufacturer and ask!  10 cents!

BOB
From: davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Dell SVR4 (and Dell hardware)
Date: 17 Aug 92 21:30:34 GMT
Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY

In article <1992Aug14.032421.22615@bluemoon.rn.com>, grant@bluemoon.rn.com (Grant DeLorean) writes:

|  The SPARC doesn't really have a "text mode", the console stuff is
| bitmapped fonts and run from slow ROM so it prints slow. Start up
| any of the intended environments (OpenWindows, X11, or even the one
| that gives one text window and nothing else) so the frame buffer
| can kick in and little can touch the Sun (not in the price range
| anyway).

  The price of a GX frame buffer is a bit dear for most private
individuals, or even for business users. And the speed of a PC class
machine, link IPC or evel IPX is not as fast as a PC in text mode. Not
under Openwin, not under X. X seems faster then openwin, though.
-- 
bill davidsen, GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
    I admit that when I was in school I wrote COBOL. But I didn't compile.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: What 'stune' parameters do you use for X386?
Organization: The Gator Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-3745
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 17:11:33 GMT

jdc3538@ultb.isc.rit.edu (J.D. Cronin ) writes:

>When we started using the X386 X-window server it quickly crashed.
>After bumping up tuneable parameters with 'idtune' it runs for much
>longer periods of time.  We are looking for other people's experience
>with idtune parameters for X386.  The goal is to have the minimum

which OS (vendor, release and version)?

We run Dell SVR4 4.0 and run X -- and have never experienced a lockup --

and we have never had to modify any of the kernel parameters

we are running X11R5 which is shipped standard with Dell SVR4


-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger)
Subject: Re: rn under Dell unix.
Organization: Macro Computer Solutions, Inc., Chicago, IL
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 04:07:39 GMT
X-Disclaimer:  Material posted in this article is the sole responsibility of
                the poster and does not represent MCSNet or the system owners.

In article <1992Aug13.154914.18855@crd.ge.com> davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen) writes:
>In article <Bsu6vw.LqJ@ef2007.efhd.ford.com>, mjo@ef2007.efhd.ford.com (Mike O'Connor) writes:
>
>| It strikes me that there's no way that Dell can ship a "standard" rn
>| suitable for everyone's configuration.  My suggestion is to replace rn
>| and the NNTP client software (inews) with the latest and greatest
>| versions, available via anonymous FTP from their "home" at
>| lib.tmc.edu.
>
>  This was reported in 2.2 beta testing and is supposedly fixed. maybe
>Dell will put the fiixed version up for ftp?

Issue 2.2 "finds" your configuration (hostname, domain, etc) and fixes
itself during installation.  It then sends you mail telling you all the
places to look (all text files) if you want to tweak anything.

Tastes great, less filling -- get the update ;-)

--
Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
Data Line: [+1 312 248-0900] Anon. arch. (nuucp) 00:00-06:00 C[SD]T
Request file: /u/public/sources/DIRECTORY/README for instructions

Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: Dell SVR4 (and Dell hardware)
Organization: The Gator Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-3745
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 22:55:55 GMT

grant@bluemoon.rn.com (Grant DeLorean) writes:

> Betcha couldn't guess what I am now running (SPARC 2)... :-}  Want
>to buy some ISC UNIX?

Don't be so quick to judge Intel based UNIX.  With the proper hardware
and OS an Intel machine could out do your Sparc.

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
Gator Communications                              uucp: ..!uunet!gator!larry
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Anyone heard of the BocaBoard?
Date: 22 Aug 92 13:30:55 GMT
Organization: The Gator Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-3745

evan@telly.on.ca (Evan Leibovitch) writes:

>Would SAS or FAS be possible on all eight ports of this thing? The
>8-port card sells for a dealer price of under $130US. A four-port
>version is under $90.

Sounds like *excellent* pricing.  Someone needs to try one and
report back!

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
From: grog@adagio.UUCP (Greg Lehey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: how to write 525MB to Wangtek 525ES on Dell 2.1?
Date: 19 Aug 92 14:52:13 GMT
Organization: LEMIS, Schellnhausen 2, W-6324 Feldatal, Germany

In article <rvdp.714046351@yam> rvdp@sow.econ.vu.nl (Ronald van der Pol) writes:
>larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>
>>rvdp@sow.econ.vu.nl (Ronald van der Pol) writes:
>
>>>We have a Wangtek 525ES SCSI cartridge tape drive which should be
>>>able to write various formats (525, 250, 150 MB). But how do you
>>>choose the format? There don't seem to be different special files
>>>for different formats. So how should it be done?
>
>>I belive the tape and drive determine this -- ie: put a 150 meg tape
>>in the drive will yield 250 megs, a 60 meg will yield 120 megs
>
>I used the Wangtek 5525ES tape drive and a DC6525 tape. The script
>wrote 9 25MB files and 13 records of the 10th file. So about 238 MB
>was written (with 9 FileMarks?). After a 'mt rewind' and a 'mt fsf 9'
>the tape looks to be  positioned at the end of the media. So how much
>is written to the tape, 250 MB or 525 MB?

Maybe we should step back and look at this from a different angle. In
particular:

- What the driver does depends on how it's programmed. I don't know
  Dell at all, but it is probably similar in behaviour to other SysV
  ports. These will determine the format of a tape when called upon to
  read it (this is the reason for the apparently non-productive noises
  when it starts reading). In the case of writing, it will take a
  default value.

- The amount that the default writes depends on the length of the tape
  (you weren't expecting that, were you?). A DC6525 tape is 1000'
  long, a DC6150 tape is 600' long. Accordingly, if you write to a
  DC6525 in QIC-150 mode, you will get about 250 MB on the tape - as
  your experiment proves.

- Despite what many people have said on the subject, your assumption
  is correct: the normal way to select densities is via a different
  minor device number, which is usually attached to a different
  special device. This is where I can't help you: your system
  documentation should help. In my (by no means exhaustive)
  experience, people haven't gone to much trouble to support QIC-525
-- 
Greg Lehey                       | Tel: +49-6637-1488              
LEMIS                            | Fax: +49-6637-1489
Schellnhausen 2, W-6324 Feldatal, Germany
*** NOTE ***: Headers are mangled - reply to grog%lemis@Germany.EU.net
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser)
Subject: Re: setting UUCP g protocol parameters under ESIX SVR4.0.3
Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix  (508) 655-3848
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 13:23:31 GMT

larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>This bug doesn't exist in Dell's UNIX -- it must be a feature in
>ESIX SVR4 :)

Gee, Larry, we haven't heard much of this from you in a while.
 ... Making up for lost time, eh?  :-)

-- 
bill@unixland.natick.ma.us                      ESIX Mailing List Moderator
Public Access UNIX/USENET/E-MAIL!  UUCP Accounts Available!  (508) 655-3848
5 lines  -  Located in Natick, MA   USA    Supporting V.32/PEP/V.42bis, etc.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: rn under Dell unix.
Keywords: inews, patch
Organization: The Gator Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-3745
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 01:08:33 GMT

lang@monolith.hal.com (Tom Lang) writes:

>The file /usr/dell/nn/inews/inews has "dell.com" hard coded into it. I've

the SVR4 4.0 release of Dell (2.2) has this corrected -- it asks for
this information at installation

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
Gator Communications                              uucp: ..!uunet!gator!larry
From: venkat@cs.concordia.ca (VENKATESH)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Help needed on Destiny
Date: 21 Aug 92 12:13:23 GMT
Organization: Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec

Hi,
	I would like to know the following:
		Are Dell's sv4 2.2 and USL's Destiny are the same or different?
		If different, from whom one can buy Destiny.
Thanks in advance,
Venkatesh.