HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jyw@phys.psu.edu (Jin-Yuan Wu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
Date: 5 Oct 92 16:00:30 GMT
Organization: Penn State, Department of Physics

Failing in birth rate control is not the only reason of porpulation expansion.
Two other factors are infant death ratio (immunization condition, etc) 
and average life time (was 34 before 1949, is 69 years). 
Sorry I used some facts which do not fit some "smart" 
quasi-polititians' political needs. But I have no way to change the 
fact and truth.


In article <1992Oct5.144430.27532@news.acns.nwu.edu> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns) writes:
>In article <BvJyv1.1DC@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> bihkyan@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Yang Yuanxin)  
>writes:
>> In article <1992Oct2.183440.13380@news.acns.nwu.edu> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu  
>(Usenet on news.acns) writes:
>> >
>> >Mao is very stupid (or crazy). Even in late 1960s, he still proudly told  
>> >foreign diplomates that he could summon a 100 million soldier army to  
>"defend"  
>> >China. I believe it was militarily motive that push Mao to encourage fast  
>> >growth of population. 
>> >
>> 
>
>Don't forget that Mao awarded so called "mather heros" in late 1950s for having  
>more than 7 children. Many Chinese were as stupid as you still are now. They  
>simply did not question the authoritis. They simply followed their "great  
>leeader".
>
>Carl
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: wenz@ucs.orst.edu (Wen Zongyao)
Subject: Re: Learn from Lei Feng (Was Re: Oct 1, Our National Day)
Organization: University Computing Services - OSU
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 01:44:53 GMT

The reason of Mao and other CCP leader want people to be like
Lei Feng so badly, is that they wouldn't have to do nothing to make
all the jobs or works done, they wouldn't even have to send orders,
because 'Lei Fengs' will do the work all by themselves.  All those
great leaders have to do is to enjoy the harvest of 'Lei Feng's'
work.  Good strategy, become kings without anybody knowing it.
Maybe another thing these kings would do is to award those 'Lei Fengs.'

 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: phsj@marlin.jcu.edu.au (su jianfeng)
Subject: Re: ROC vs PRC
Organization: James Cook University
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 92 05:52:31 GMT

Today, people in mainland China know CCP much more than KMT.


J Su
From: utingli@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Tingli Pan)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
Date: 5 Oct 92 21:14:43 GMT
Organization: Educational Computing Network

In article <1992Oct5.123602.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> haiqiu@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:
>In article <BvJ2tB.Mw6@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
>
......

>  So as the CCP is not doing the right thing. You do not want to either? Then
>How can I consider you as any better than CCP?
>  As for initiating the world war. All I remember is that both WW-I and WW-II
>were not initiated by a communist country. In the WW-I the Russia became the
>first country to end the War after it became a communist communist country. In
>WW-II the war starts as the USSR be invaded by the capitalist NAZI Deutchland.

But Hitler had called himself as socialist.

Tingli Pan
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: jinxiong@cs.ucf.edu (Chen Jinxiong)
Subject: Re: Dui Lian
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 04:26:25 GMT

In article <97694@bu.edu> lix@yangtze.bu.edu (Xiaowen Li) writes:
>In article <Oct.5.15.52.10.1992.18713@europa.rutgers.edu> pli@europa.rutgers.edu (Peiyuan Li) writes:
>>Is there anyperson to know the Dui Lian in Wu Hou Shi, Chengdu,
>>Shichuan, which was famous historically. 
>>
>>..PL
>
>Well, read "Sichuan Folks" #2.
>-- 
****************
BTW, there are couples of them. Which one do you mean? I am from Chengdu.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns)
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 22:55:36 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.184002.15132@ms.uky.edu> gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li) writes:
> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns) writes:
> 
> >In article <1992Oct6.171507.29459@ms.uky.edu> gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li)  
writes:
> >> xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
> >> 
> >> >>Remains of Yue4 Fei1 and Qin2 Hui4.
> >> 
> >> >What have this to do with Yue Fei and Qin Hui? I guess modern China
> >> >needs neither of them.
> >> 
> >> Unfortunately you always have these kind of people.
> 
> >Yes, there are always these two kinds of people, ultra-leftests and  
> >ultra-rightests, just like there are always beggars, prostitutes and  
> >religiously crazy people in a society. But this does not mean these people  
are  
> >the treasure of a society.
> 
> >Carl
> 
> Then go back to China and turn down the temple of Yue Fei.

I am not a ultra-rightist. Why bother to burn the temple down? It is a good  
place to suck tourists' money. It is also a place to ask people like Steve Lin  
to pay 3 times as much as a Chinese does. Why should we burn it down? Only  
stupid ultra-rightists will probably do this. To me, Temple of Yue Fei is as  
same as Shao4 Lin2 Shi4 (Shaolin Temple).

Carl
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: smo@uceng.UC.EDU (Shouwen Mo)
Subject: Cornell University | Looking for Wendy Fu
Organization: College of Engineering, University of Cincinnati
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 19:24:18 GMT

 
   Looking for Wendy Fu ( Fu Wen Yu ) in Cornell University.
   If you know her phone #, please Email to  smo@uceng.uc.edu

   Thanks a lot !

 
-- 
   Michael Shouwen Mo
   smo@uceng.uc.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: ldong@hila.hut.fi (Liyun Dong)
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 22:07:25 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.23955.16231@ms.uky.edu> gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li) writes:
>"The world has changed..."
>In the past 200 years, military power was very important. You use the power
>to invade, to control, to rob, to distroy, to capture the market, to build
>your business everywhere, to do everything you want, of cause you also need to 
>build up your economy. China lost almost every chance of these, and did not
>have a little taste of the power. Are those things bad? Depends on who you are.
>Look at today's Japan and Germany.
>Today, you do not need the old way. The important thing is the economical
>power. You can use the power to enter a country, to control, to buy, to distory,
>to capture the market, to build up your business everywhere, to do everything
>you want, and it is clear now that the important thing is to build up your
>economy. See any difference between now and then?
>What is the new meaning of independence? Do you see any chance now for China
>to get those opportunities, to get a little taste of the power, to march Chinese
>army to the world, to do everything those superpowers can do, to get
>independent, to win the new world war in the world market?
>WHERE IS CHINESE ARMY NOW?
>WHO CARES?
>WHERE IS TALK.BUSINESS.CHINA?

Human history is a bloody story. Sometime there were hundreds years of
peaces between endless wars. Then people were lucky. Don't forgrt that WORLD
WAR II, the last major war was only 50 years away. Local wars have never 
stopped. 

BTW CIA or KGB cares more about PLA than you do.

H.Pan
------
pan@hermes.hut.fi
From: qinyi@uk.ac.man.cs (Yi Qin (BCW PhD))
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: No Comment (fwd)
Date: 3 Oct 92 12:31:03 GMT
Organization: University of Manchester, UK
In-reply-to: zhu@cs.UAlberta.CA's message of 2 Oct 92 16:03:22 GMT


>        BEIJING (UPI) -- The cash and prizes awarded to China's gold
medalists
>at the Barcelona Olympics have proven a mixed blessing as the newly rich
>athletes are being besieged by charity cases and con artists, a state-
>run newspaper reported Thursday.

Do most of us remember the old saying, "Jun1 pin2 fu4, deng3 gui4 jian4"?
People's mind has been directed by such a slogan for hundreds, even more
than a couple of thousands, years. People just don't understand what the
Olympic medalists will have got is not easy money. They have paid the
price much much more than the money. Well, hopeless.

This reminded me of something strange happened around me before. When
some one wrote a paper, he came into such a problem, everyone in his
research group wanted to have his/her name on the paper, no matter what
they had contributed technically. Even the accountant wanted a share,
as the cash needed for the conference had to go through her. Some people
may tell other stories like the sort. Things are just going strange.

Yi Qin
qinyi@cs.man.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,talk.politics.china
From: phd_d8@gsbacd.uchicago.edu
Subject: Re: Do Something For Yourself, Guys--Protection Bill.
Organization: 
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 07:09:52 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.012336.2587@news.iastate.edu>, zzuo@iastate.edu (Zhiqi Zuo) writes:
> In article <1992Oct1.181651.27728@linus.mitre.org> 129.83.161.10 (H. Chao) writes:
> ...
>>> >> ..., ...
>>> > Yes, I will do something for myself, but not by using other people's blood
>>> >and telling lies. I am against this bill.
>>> 
>>> If Bush signs the bill and move the date to current, are you still hate the 
>>> bill? Why don't you call Bush and ask him to do so. That is what to do sth
>>> for yourself.
>>> 
>>> 
>>
>>Yes, I still hate the bill, unless this bill can cover all Chinese student.
> 
>     I still hate the bill, unless this bill can cover all WORLD students.
> 
	I still hate the bill, unless this bill can cover ALL WORLD PEOPLE.
From: lix@yangtze.bu.edu (Xiaowen Li)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Poor Man
Date: 6 Oct 92 02:12:34 GMT
Distribution: world,soc
Organization: Boston University

In article <1992Oct5.111632.15249@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> dhsy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu writes:
>Sanyee_Tang@mindlink.bc.ca (Sanyee Tang) writes: 
>>(deleted)
>   You got it backwards.  A Pi3-Fu1 is a WOMAN (mate of man) and a Pi3-Fu4
>is a man (mate of woman).  So what Lix said was that
>
>   "The Mate of Man (i.e. the woman) committed no crime, but the Jade she
>carries (instead of a Baby) is the crime".
>
>dhsy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu

Well, I have to give another lecture to dhsy. It is OK to read "Pi3"
as "to match". But then the sentence should be correspondingly changed.
Furthermore, Sanyee cited "Pi Fu1 Pi Fu4" as evidence of "Yi Fu1 Yi Qi1"
is more sound, since as Dr. Johnny said: "Pi Fu1 Pi Fu4"? I prefer to
kill myself. The whole sentence cann't be explained by "mate".

Sanyee is also right to point out that at that time, only very poor
man could have one wife. For example, even a beggar could have two.

So in ancient time, we call

the man with no wife:  Kuang Fu (Open husband)
the man with only one wife: Pi Fu (single husband)
the man with two wives: Qi Ren (name from the beggar story)
The man with 100+ wives: Du Fu (single husband)

So young people like dhsy may easily get confused by the use of Pi and
Du.
-- 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,ucs.network
From: yawei@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (~{QG9p~})
Subject: Re: What abbreviation is ALOHA?
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 04:14:35 GMT

In article <BvoFqz.1Dt@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:

>For network expert: What is the abbreviation of the word ALOHA.

I guess you can abbreviate it to "A." or "Al.", :-)  never seen
anyone abbreviate it though.

It is a word from the language spoken by Hawaiin natives and
means something like "hello", I think.  

I do wonder whether there's a general term for Hawaiin natives
similar to "Indians" for American natives?  I guess they should be 
called "Chinese" or "Japanese", in the same spirit as "Indians". :-)


Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: jjs@iedv7.acd.com ( James J. Song       )
Subject: Michael Chang's family sacrificed for him 
Organization: Applied Computing Devices, Inc.
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 12:44:17 GMT

In article <1992Sep24.190528.26844@tamsun.tamu.edu> chen@cs.tamu.edu (Jianer Chen ) writes:
>Are you sure that Michael's family is that bad?  This might not 
>be an acceptable manner for a native american to 
>receive so much care from his family, but I don't see 
>what is wrong for a family to take care of a family 
>member and the member himself likes the way.  
>(family value, right?  :-)) Michael 
>seems at least not dislike that.  By the way, Michael 
>has made much progress after his brother became his coach.
>
>-- JC
>

I only heard that Michael Chang's family had sold their house to 
support his training. The similar stories have also taken places 
in other tennis stars' families. It is not cheap to be among the 
best in sports like tennis.
___

Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:26978 soc.culture.taiwan:14137
From: gyu@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU (George)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
Subject: Help needed to solve ordinary differential equations
Keywords: Solving a system of two ODE
Date: 5 Oct 92 18:28:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: rnd.30554
Followup-To: poster
Organization: NYU Stern School of Business

I am seeking help from mathematicans or like to solve the system of two 
ordinary differential equations. Please give me any suggestions or ways of 
solving the problem, or explicit solutions. You help will be greatly 
appreciated. The following LaTeX file contains the problem.


George
---------------

\documentstyle[twoside,11pt]{article}
\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.4}
\addtolength{\topmargin}{-5pc}
\addtolength{\textheight}{8pc}
\addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-3pc}
\addtolength{\textwidth}{6pc}
\setlength{\evensidemargin}{\oddsidemargin}
\newenvironment{you}[1]{\begin{list}{}{\addtolength{\leftmargin}{#1pt}
  \setlength{\rightmargin}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}
\newcommand{\rt}{\right}
\newcommand{\lt}{\left}

\begin{document}
{\bf Could you please help me to solve the following Ordinary Differential 
Equation (ODE)?}
\[ d\lt(\begin{array}{l} Y_t\\ Z_t \end{array}\rt)=\lt(
\begin{array}{l} e^{Z_t-Y_t}\\ \rho e^{Y_t-Z_t}-{2\over\beta\sigma^2}(\beta r_1S_t+\beta\mu +Z_t-1) \end{array}\rt).  \]
where both $Y_t,Z_t$ are functions of $S_t$ with some given initial values.
\end{document}
From: stlin@stevelin.Eng.Sun.COM (Steven Lin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
Date: 2 Oct 1992 21:55:35 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: stevelin

In article <1992Oct2.182532.14093@odin.corp.sgi.com> (Yu Chang) writes:
>In article <1992Oct2.120636.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> haiqiu@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:
>
>|> that China had to develop the A-Bombs to defend the largest nation in the
>|> world. I hope China never have a chance that it need to use A-Bomb to protect
>|> it. However China has got to have it for safety when others have it.
>
In the summer of 1966, Mao challenged the US: if the nuclear war happens between
China and the US, the loser will be the US. Mao despite using "people sea" tactics
in Korea War, using huge population of human bodies, to resist US killing machines,
he again tried to put half of Chinese people under war, to keep his own power.
He threatened the US: if the nuclear war happens, the US mass population will be 
destroyed since they live in the cities; on the other hand, one half of Chinese
population live in country site will be safe. In order to save himeself, he
ordered to dig shelters underground of Beijing city.

What a GREAT CRAZY MAN!  He made his own way to suffer in the hell, because
there are so many souls must have reported to the hell king that Mao put them
to be killed without notice.
>
>|> > And BTW, whose fault was that of the huge population?
>|> 
A huge population is a great resource to rebuild China. It is not a fault!

>|>   I have read a book written by Jiang Jie-Shi, the KMT ruler before 1949. I
>|> got such a idea that if it is Jiang in mainland after 1949. The population
>|> will be much much huger now. For in that book he accused CCP of try all kinds
>|> of method to reduce the Chinese population including massacre, and he said
>|> what he will do is encourage the fast growth of the population so China is
>|> the Ultra-largest and strongest nation in the world.
>No matter what is in the book, Chiang still did NOT committed the crime.
>Blame it to others and saying it could worse is totally meaningless empty talk.
>This is almost worse than the US presidential campaign going on now.

Looking the population policies on both sides will give people a clear contrast.
Taiwan has population control policy, two children is about right, one child is
not too less. There was no force abortion policy, or penality. The population
increasing rate is declined year by year.
Mainland enforces one child policy, the forced abortion and penality were 
carried out in some degree. The population pressure is still sky high.

What a CCP propaganda!
From: pli@europa.rutgers.edu (Peiyuan Li)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Dui Lian
Date: 5 Oct 92 19:52:12 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

Is there anyperson to know the Dui Lian in Wu Hou Shi, Chengdu,
Shichuan, which was famous historically. 

..PL
From: pwu@oreo.ai.mit.edu (Peng Wu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Can I buy a fax machine from U.S. and install in China?
Date: 29 Sep 92 16:54:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: life.28572
In-reply-to: xiong@bsu-cs.bsu.edu's message of 29 Sep 92 03:50:15 GMT


    From: xiong@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Bo Xiong)
    Subject: Re: Can I buy a fax machine from U.S. and install in China?
    Date: 29 Sep 92 03:50:15 GMT
    
    In article <28528@life.ai.mit.edu> pwu@oreo.ai.mit.edu (Peng Wu) writes:
    >
    >Relax.  Just register and get on with your live.  In US, one used to have to
    >get a license from FCC for operating a CB radio.  Now I believe the
    >regulation/law still says the same but FCC has long stopped licensing and any
    >one can operate a CB without a license now.  Similar things happened to China.
    >One used to have to register his/her radio with police, in the 50's I think.
    >Today, probably there are not many who even know such a regulation existed.
    
    You relax :-)  The requirement for FAX machine owners to register with
    Public Security Bureau was imposed shortly AFTER June 4th Beijing Masscare,
    your reasoning/prediction doesn't quiet apply here.

You missed my point.  Ridiculous regulations will go away in due time.

Relax.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns)
Subject: Re: Oct 1, Greencard, and others
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 16:02:29 GMT

In article <BvJ36E.I0q@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> utingli@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Tingli Pan)  
writes:
> In article <1992Oct2.222038.17560@news.acns.nwu.edu> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu  
(Usenet on news.acns) writes:
> >In article <9210022142.AA09340@phloem.uoregon.edu> Tuya@ccmail.uoregon.edu  
> >> 
> .......
> 
> >>           My proposal would be to initiate two more bills: one deports
> >>           group A from the U.S., another deports B.  I propose Mr.
> >>           Shannon Yeh as the coordinator for both bills, and Zhao
> >>           Haiqing the director.  No matter which one passes, it will
> >>           ultimately benefit democracy and human rights in China for
> >>           the group that is deported will increase the su4 zhi4 of the
> >>           population in China.
> >
> >
> >Good joke! Let's do a little bit further more. Let's propose Mr. Shi Chunde  
as  
> >the coordinator for a bill to send both groups A and B back, along with  
those  
> >ABCs or even those who have one Chinese parent or grand-parent or  
> >grand-grand-parent. After all of them are sent back (of course, including  
me),  
> >we will see a democratic and strong China soon (or maybe even overnight, who  
> >knows!).
> > Carl

> No, we will only bring back more fight back to China. What a bright
> future.
> 
> Tingli Pan


Yes, after group A and B step (as well as ABCs) step on Chinese soil, a brutal  
war will occur soon. They will first language-abuse against each other, then  
fist-fight, then use various weapons they can get, then jail their opponents,  
sentence them for life, shoot them, hang them, chop their heads off, drown them  
and bury them alive. After this, a tempory stable situation will be mentained  
for a short peroid of time. Then another war will break out for who should be  
responsible for the killing. One thing is for sure, China will have negative  
population growth rate. One thing is not for sure: will the names of Shannon  
Yeh and Shi Chunde also fall into the list of missing in action?

Carl

 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: txa95@isuvax.iastate.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,talk.politics.china
Subject: re: my prediction about the protection bill
Date: 28 Sep 92 22:37:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Sep28.223755.24569
Reply-To: txa95@isuvax.iastate.edu
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa


In <9209281840.AA06461@phloem.uoregon.edu> Tuya@ccmail.uoregon.edu writes:

>          Right, during the 4 days left, he may veto the bill.  It is
                                                                 ^^^^^
>          as clear as the sky that Bush is using the bill as an
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>          important barginning chip to negotiate the CCP.
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

           ...................
  
>          So in the final analysis, who decides whether the bill can
>          pass?  Not Bush, not congress, not Cliton, but DXP.

Who do you think you are to CCP? Important chip? Give me a break. CCP has
too many issues to worry about: F-16 fighter to Taiwan, Trade talk, GATT,
.... You said this bill is more important to CCP than all these above?
Yes, to those who want to get their 6.4 green card, this bill is too
important. But do not think it is something to CCP, too. They will not
care much. You need to beg to those US politician. Show them that you hate
CCP and you are loyal to the US. Show them that you can make some noise to
help US in the Sino-US relationship. If you can convince them and they are
in good mood, they may issue those cards to you, just like giving quarters
to the beggars. Do not be naive enough to think you can fool around and
get it for free.

I hope this helps you understand the reality behind this bill.