HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mcsbc1itr@dct.ac.uk
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
Subject: satan, son of
Date: 27 Aug 92 12:55:11 +0100
Organization: Dundee Institute of Technology


Satan claims to be my son...........

				.......but hes not evil enough....!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       *.                     .*             
                        \   .              .  /                             
                         \      .      .     /                              
                          \        .        /                               
                           \   .      .    /                                
                            \             /.                                 
                        .    \           /    .                              
                    .         \         /        .                           
                *--------------\-------/------------*        
                                \     /                                    
                                 \   /                                      
                                  \ /                                       
                                   *

             SEE YOU IN HELL, IF NOT BE FOR !!!!!!!!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Ian T. Roxborough.	mcsbc1itr@uk.ac.dct.cc.vaxb

	disclaimer:.....who cares who wins...or wot I say?.
                                    (its normaly bullshit any way)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky alt.satanism:1913 alt.atheism:16186 soc.motss:37570 sci.physics:13814 alt.religion.emacs:385 talk.religion.newage:4141 alt.pagan:8529 alt.sex:27944 talk.religion.misc:15202
From: dart@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dartanyan the Witchling)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism,alt.atheism,soc.motss,sci.physics,alt.religion.emacs,talk.religion.newage,alt.pagan,alt.sex,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Subject?
Date: 30 Aug 92 16:10:04 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

In article <1992Aug28.134921.28421@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> mwsn_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Matthew Weasner) writes:
>>>  "The higher you fly, the faster you fall."          -- Laurie Anderson
>>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>That's not true.  You have a defective .sig.
>>-Scott
>actually, in a way, I think it is true. You accelerate at the same rate. 
>(9.8 m/s ?) So if you are higher, you get more time to accelerate. Therefore,
>you are going faster when you hit the ground and go <SPLAT!>. Elementary, my
>dear Scott. What does Aikido Ki No Kawa mean anyway?

	Um, am I truly to believe that this person has never heard of maximum
velocity?  A human body reahces this, based on its surface area, falling
normally with some tumbling (not a dive) after about 4.5 stories.  In a dive,
this takes about 8 stories, and the MaxVel is higher, as the body has less
surface area splatting into the wind and thus more aerodynamicity.
	As for the other question, i have no idea, but I can take a stab:
	Aikido: a form of martial arts.
	Ki: Botha Sumerian Goddess, and a (chinese?) word meaning roughly
		"spirit-life-force"
	No: means either Negative or lack, or a form of oriantal formal dance
		theatre.
	Kawa: um.... um.... evolutionary descendants of the Jawas in Star Wars,
or something you say in Denny's when extremely drunk and trying to order
coffee.
				D
Xref: sparky alt.satanism:1923 alt.atheism:16229 soc.motss:37641 sci.physics:13860 alt.religion.emacs:390 talk.religion.newage:4153 alt.pagan:8563 alt.sex:28027 talk.religion.misc:15278
From: dart@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dartanyan the Witchling)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism,alt.atheism,soc.motss,sci.physics,alt.religion.emacs,talk.religion.newage,alt.pagan,alt.sex,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Subject?
Date: 31 Aug 92 15:33:44 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

In article <16853CEC8.IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU> IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU (macphil) writes:
>>        No: means either Negative or lack
>why do we assume "no means no" in every non-English language?

	One tends to look like less of a stupid asshole when one quotes the
entire paragraph referred to.  In this particular case, I believe the entire
line read somehting like:
	No: means either Negative or Lack in english, or a form of formal
oriantal dance theatre.

				Thank you  :P

						D
Newsgroups: alt.satanism,alt.atheism,alt.pagan
From: n8946410@fozzie.cc.wwu.edu (Cameron Parish)
Subject: Re: Subject?
Organization: Western Washington University
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 21:26:17 GMT

In article <64830@cup.portal.com> ts@cup.portal.com (Tim W Smith) writes:
>	If someone asks you to save their seat, turn to the seat and
>	start telling it loudly that it must repent its sins and accept
>	Jesus, and then start praying for it.
	
Actual conversation:

	"Pardon me, is this seat saved?"

	"Well, Thomas Aquinas said that animals don't have souls, so I
	  	doubt there's much hope for a chair."


 -- Cam 
Xref: sparky alt.satanism:1896 alt.atheism:16059 soc.motss:37245 sci.physics:13716 alt.religion.emacs:370 talk.religion.newage:4110 alt.pagan:8437 alt.sex:27798 talk.religion.misc:15079
From: swedlund@feserve.cc.purdue.edu (erik)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism,alt.atheism,soc.motss,sci.physics,alt.religion.emacs,talk.religion.newage,alt.pagan,alt.sex,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Subject?
Date: 28 Aug 92 00:31:24 GMT
Organization: Purdue University


	Jesus Christ saves sinners...

		AND REDEEMS THEM FOR VALUABLE CASH PRIZES!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Once out of nature I shall never take        erik Swedlund
 My bodily form from any natural thing,       swedlund@feserve.cc.purdue.edu
 But such a form as Grecian goldsmiths make
 Of hammered gold and gold enamelling
 To keep a drowsy Emperor awake;              Just.  Just just.  That's it.
 Or set upon a golden bough to sing
 To lords and ladies of Byzantium
 Of waht is past, or passing, or to come."
--W.B. Yeats
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Xref: sparky alt.satanism:1906 alt.atheism:16106 soc.motss:37376 sci.physics:13741 alt.religion.emacs:378 talk.religion.newage:4129 alt.pagan:8467 alt.sex:27847 talk.religion.misc:15130
From: sichase@csa1.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism,alt.atheism,soc.motss,sci.physics,alt.religion.emacs,talk.religion.newage,alt.pagan,alt.sex,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Subject?
Date: 28 Aug 92 18:23:40 GMT
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
Distribution: na
Reply-To: sichase@csa1.lbl.gov
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.196
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4   

In article <1992Aug28.134921.28421@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>, mwsn_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Matthew Weasner) writes...
>In article <25660@dog.ee.lbl.gov> sichase@csa3.lbl.gov writes:
>>In article <34544@cbmvax.commodore.com>, kominetz@cbmvax.commodore.com (John Kominetz - CATS) writes...
>>>Bush spends.
>>>-- 
>>>                                      __
>>>        John Kominetz, III            \/          Aikido Ki No Kawa
>>>  Commodore Apps and Tech Support           "I speak for myself, not C=."
>>> ========================================================================
>>>  "The higher you fly, the faster you fall."          -- Laurie Anderson
>>
>>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>That's not true.  You have a defective .sig.
>>
>>-Scott
>actually, in a way, I think it is true. You accelerate at the same rate. 
>(9.8 m/s ?) So if you are higher, you get more time to accelerate. Therefore,
>you are going faster when you hit the ground and go <SPLAT!>. Elementary, my
>dear Scott. What does Aikido Ki No Kawa mean anyway?
> 
>my 2 measly cents.

Listen up, Sherlock. :-)

When an object falls through the atmosphere (which is what happens if it
suddenly stop flying) it achieves terminal velocity very quickly.  The actual
value of this terminal velocity varies depending upon the object's shape - but
for a person it is probably in the vacinity of 60 - 200 mph (someone else may
have better information - I'm sure that parachuters know a better value.)  at
9.8 m/s^2 (note the units - yours were wrong)  you get to terminal velocity in 3
seconds (for 60 mph.)  In that time you drop only 30 meters.  So if you are
falling from any height much greater than 30 meters (probable if you were
flying,) then you will reach terminal velocity early in your fall.  The velocity
with which you splat will therefore be independent of the height from which you
fell. 

-Scott

--------------------
Scott I. Chase			"The question seems to be of such a character
SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV		that if I should come to life after my death
				and some mathematician were to tell me that it
				had been definitely settled, I think I would
				immediately drop dead again."      - Vandiver
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
From: markh@wimsey.bc.ca (Mark C. Henderson)
Subject: Re: find lives
Organization: Wimsey 
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1992 03:19:04 GMT

In article <j1moody-010992225338@lafmac15.lafortune.lab.nd.edu> j1moody@darwin.cc.nd.edu (Humpty Dumpty) writes:
>Satanism is the result of insecurity...
Flame bait.
Xref: sparky alt.satanism:1921 alt.atheism:16207 soc.motss:37614 sci.physics:13831 alt.religion.emacs:388 talk.religion.newage:4146 alt.pagan:8546 alt.sex:27990 talk.religion.misc:15253
From: jbw@bigbird.bu.edu (Joe Wells)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism,alt.atheism,soc.motss,sci.physics,alt.religion.emacs,talk.religion.newage,alt.pagan,alt.sex,talk.religion.misc
Subject: falling from a height (was: Subject?)
Date: 31 Aug 92 04:45:23 GMT
 <25660@dog.ee.lbl.gov> <1992Aug28.134921.28421@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
 <25832@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
Followup-To: alt.satanism
Distribution: na
Organization: Boston University Computer Science Department
In-reply-to: sichase@csa1.lbl.gov's message of 28 Aug 92 18:23:40 GMT

Those of you who think that objects will never fall faster than terminal
velocity are rather naive.  Objects falling faster than terminal velocity
will decelerate of course, but an object falling from 10,000 miles will
still hit the ground faster than one falling from 1,000 miles.  The
obvious reason is that terminal velocity is faster the higher you go.

Anyway, satanists, atheists, motssers, Emacs users, new agers, pagans, and
people who like to discuss sex will all bounce when they hit the ground
rather than going splat.  (This paragraph is to justify responding to such
a widely crossposted article in the same newsgroups.  :-)

-- 
Joe Wells <jbw@cs.bu.edu>
Member of the League for Programming Freedom --- send e-mail for details
From: dart@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dartanyan the Witchling)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
Subject: Re: Subject?
Date: 30 Aug 92 16:23:55 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

In article <7539@monmouth.edu> c1741@moncol.monmouth.edu (MICHAEL CARSON) writes:
>	Terminal Velocity depends on the existance of an atmosphere, neh?
>In a vaccuum, there should be no speed limit, until you start to reach a 
>significant fraction of the speed of light, at which point I don't pretend
>to understand.
>	Anyway, I've always found the use of "terminal velocity" in the
>context of skydiving somewhat ironic. :)

	Unfortunately, the only place that could support such a situation would
be th event horizon of a black hole, and there is no proof that one would go 
"splat" there.  As a matter of fact, it generally assumed you would go "squish"
instead.
	As a result, the .sig is still faulty, as it should read "the higher you
fly within the event horizon of a black hole, the faster you fall" or, perhaps,
"the higher you fly towards the constellation of Cygnus, the faster you MIGHT
fall, if you happen to have unlucky bearings and you happen to fly high enough
to be within the grip of the black hole known there"

	I recommend the former, unless you are attempting to confuse someone.

	"Above all else, the perpetual question that will remain with mankind
forever is this: Is the plural of smurf smurfs or smurves?" -- dodger

				D
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
From: J024330@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Subject: Re: Pointer to Biblical history quiz.
Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 14:37:02 GMT

turpin@cs.utexas.edu (Russell Turpin)writes in <17h5rkINNa2o@cs.utexas.edu>:

-*----
>I have reposted my (in)famous Biblical history quiz in
>talk.religion.misc.  You can find it by searching article
>headers for the name "turpin".

Would you post it here too, or send it to me via E-Mail?  My reader doesn't
get any of the talk.*.* groups.
From: dart@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dartanyan the Witchling)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
Subject: Subject??
Date: 2 Sep 92 15:47:26 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center


In article <Btutw9.4LG@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> on
31 Aug 92 15:33:44 GMT you write:

>>>In article <16853CEC8.IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU> IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU (mac>>>        No: means either Negative or lack
>>>>why do we assume "no means no" in every non-English language?
>>>
>>>        One tends to look like less of a stupid asshole when one quotes the
>>>entire paragraph referred to.  In this particular case, I believe the entire
>>>line read somehting like:
>>>        No: means either Negative or Lack in english, or a form of formal
>>>oriantal dance theatre.
>>>
>>
>>Gee, I didn't know your terminal had mirroring capabilities...how else
>>would you have such a good idea of what a stupid a**hole looked like?


	So I mailed him saying : 
		Misquoting on the net is generally considered a breach of
usenet ethics.  It is considered impolite, and if there is any editing done
to an article, it should be done in such a way to not take it out of context.

	And you can use the letter s.

	If you discontinue editing sentences in half, just so you can make a
lame attempt at a flame for the hell of it (no pun), you will not look
like an asshole (_s_es included)

						D

	This would have ended it, or at least kept it out of everyone's faces,
but for the little fact that the only mail I go tback was:

Message 2/61  From macphil                             Sep 2 '92 at 10:08 am est

Date:         Wed, 02 Sep 92 10:08:37 EST
Subject:      Re: Subject?
To: Dartanyan the Witchling <dart@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>

*******************************************************************
*                                                                 *
*    MailScan V 2.7b (beta)                                       *
*                                                                 *
*  Your email address has been added to those ignored by the      *
*  owner of this userid.  No further messages will be referenced. *
*  They will be purged before this userid is aware of their       *
*  existence.                                                     *
*                                                                 *
*******************************************************************


	As this somewhat pissed me off, i have to return to the net for 
expression.
	I hereby request that anyone who is bored and would like to take out
some frustration, please send rude mail to IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU
	It's a matter of vengeance, spite, and the ever-present effort to 
stomp out stupidity and ignorance.


			Thanks:
					D
From: dart@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dartanyan the Witchling)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
Subject: Re: satan, son of
Date: 30 Aug 92 16:43:17 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

In article <1992Aug29.044441.6312@ctr.columbia.edu> locklin@titan.ucc.umass.edu (SCOTT C LOCKLIN) writes:
>Don't know where you get the pagan thing from. I think some ceremonial magick
>types use the pentagram for an earth symbol. Some also use it for north(same 
>as earth).
	Wiccans do too.  Got the pagan thing from Spiral Dance and from
Drwaing Down the Moon.  Earth and north are corelated.  Pentacle became coins
or stones later, and is best known for its existence in the Tarot, which it
still remains in, as well as in the Modern Tarot, now shown as Diamond.
	(though I never figured out why they don't call that suit "rubies" 
as diamonds aren't red.)

>It should be noted that the pentagram as a symbol contains the 4 classical
>elements plus spirit (either the top or bottom, depending how ya hold it)
>in most standard systems (golden dawn etc..)
>I like it 'cause it looks real cool ;)

	OH, YOU MEAN Orange, Pungent, Prickle, Sweet, and Boom?
	The 5 elements, that is, and what's this spirit thing.
		(I know, I know)
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 09:15:40 EDT
From: <WJS112@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
Subject: Re: find lives and comments.

   Well, at least someone said something interesting...You know, this used
to be such a fun board....what happened..
A few points to make.
  1. Satanism (a christian word) for some probably is something to hide behind,
     for some people.  However, you would then have to say the same thing for
     any cult or practice.
  2. Not all satanists worship the devil, not all satanists practice a lower
     form of magick.
  3. As always, comment as you see fit. chow.

                                     va cra t'ra om ti ra can. --so is this
                                             a mantra/spell/etc,..or is it very
                                             bad latin.

           p.s. any errors in this note are the devils doing...

                                                              fuzzy.
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
From: mwsn_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Matthew Weasner)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism,alt.atheism,soc.motss,sci.physics,alt.religion.emacs,talk.religion.newage,alt.pagan,alt.sex,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Subject?
Date: 31 Aug 92 04:01:30 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Rochester (Rochester, NY)

In article <Btt0ws.Kn7@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> dart@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dartanyan the Witchling) writes:
>In article <1992Aug28.134921.28421@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> mwsn_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Matthew Weasner) writes:
>>>>  "The higher you fly, the faster you fall."          -- Laurie Anderson
>>>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>That's not true.  You have a defective .sig.
>>>-Scott
>>actually, in a way, I think it is true. You accelerate at the same rate. 
>>(9.8 m/s ?) So if you are higher, you get more time to accelerate. Therefore,
>>you are going faster when you hit the ground and go <SPLAT!>. Elementary, my
>
I guess I forgot about all youse technical minded folks out on the net. Sorry,
high school physics was a long time ago. :-) My apologies. Terminal what? 
Later folks.

matt
Newsgroups: alt.satanism,alt.atheism,soc.motss,sci.physics,alt.religion.emacs,talk.religion.newage,alt.pagan,alt.sex,talk.religion.misc
From: csjgp@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Jim Pierson)
Subject: Re: Subject?
Organization: Educational Computing Network
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 22:22:06 GMT

>>In article <FeosPB2w176w@west.darkside.com> safecrac@west.darkside.com (Chris Colvin) writes:
>Jesus Saves.


My favorite has always been:

"Jesus died to forgive our sins.  Dare we make his martyrdom meaningless
by not committing them?"    Jules Feiffer,  "Little Murders"

Jim                              csjgp@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu

Newsgroups: alt.satanism
From: st923058@pip.cc.brandeis.edu (Rosaleen Dhu)
Subject: velocity
Reply-To: st923058@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:26:01 GMT

Hi folks. I know I missed out on most of the terminal velocity discussions.
(It isn't my fault that I only got here four days ago.) I have a quote for all you terminal velocity fans out there:
		"i'm afraid of grounds."
		"You mean heights."
		"I know what I mean! It's the ground that kills you!"
Also, in response to all the stuff about Xtians: what is an Xtian? The only
Xtians I know are a race of sibilant humanoids in a book by Ann Maxwell. I
would be very interested in anything you guys could tell me about Xtians.
Io Pan!
					Jess(brand new to this newsgroup)
Xref: sparky alt.satanism:1905 alt.atheism:16103 soc.motss:37365 sci.physics:13740 alt.religion.emacs:377 talk.religion.newage:4128 alt.pagan:8465 alt.sex:27845 talk.religion.misc:15128
From: c1741@moncol.monmouth.edu (MICHAEL CARSON)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism,alt.atheism,soc.motss,sci.physics,alt.religion.emacs,talk.religion.newage,alt.pagan,alt.sex,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Subject?
Date: 28 Aug 92 16:52:00 GMT
Followup-To: alt.satanism
Distribution: na
Organization: Monmouth College, W. Long Branch, N.J.  07764

In article <BtpB5L.AGr@news.larc.nasa.gov> carlson@ab24.larc.nasa.gov (Ann Carlson) writes:
>
>Um, Matt?  Have you ever heard of terminal velocity?  Ask a sky diver sometime.
>    
>*Dr. Ann B. Carlson (carlson@ab24.larc.nasa.gov)*       O .

	Terminal Velocity depends on the existance of an atmosphere, neh?
In a vaccuum, there should be no speed limit, until you start to reach a 
significant fraction of the speed of light, at which point I don't pretend
to understand.
	Anyway, I've always found the use of "terminal velocity" in the
context of skydiving somewhat ironic. :)

|o|\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/|o|
|o| Of Course I speak  |      michael carson       | Carpe Diem, Man.        |o|
|o|  only for myself.  | c1741@moncol.monmouth.edu |                -me      |o|
|o| Would YOU let me   +---------------------------+-------------------------|o|
|o|  speak for you?!?  |      All flames to: nobody@moncol.monmouth.edu      |o|
|o|\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/|o|