HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sl859@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: FAVORITE X-VILAINS (was Re: Just a thought)
Date: 4 Oct 92 00:32:25 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1992Oct3.183703.10189@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>, kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER) writes:
> I thought that Rev. Striker (from _GOD LOVES, MAN KILLS_) was one of the best
> X-men villains.  He's the personification of what the x-men fight against
> Blind hatred and prejudice.
> I also think Apoclypse is good, for the same reasons that Mr. Sinister is; he's
> bad and powerful (for a really good story with the big A, check out Wolverine:
> the Jungle adventure)
> ---SCAVENGER
> ps.  I forgot to mention that they're both really smart, too.

Selene, Selene, Selene!
The Black Queen!
(Hey!  That rhymes!  I'm a poet!  But you all know that!)
Anyhow, She's smart, Really Crafty, Not just a slugfest villain, ancient,
Magical, really powerful, not to mention VERY EVIL!

Besides, she scares the piss out of me, which means she is definately a 
great hero.  (the only others that really have done that in the past
were the Demon Bear from New Mutants and Karma/ShadowLord, also from the
New Mutants!)  Anyhow, I shure would like to know where the heck she is!
I remember one hint of her, back when Sabastian Shaw was killed and White
Queen was being ex'd, but that was never followed up on.  I was excited
because her attitude was "Bring it on, boys!"  (I would Love to see Selene
White Queen and Sebastian Kick the Tar out of Shinobi and the Upchucks!  
Oh I mean Upstarts!)

							wReam...
						     Ultimate Ninja!

P.S.  I do like Apacolypse, but I think that Mr. Sinister is stupid.  I thought
the whole way they introduced him and how he is portrayed to be somewhat of
the "same old villain that has been around forever that we have never heard
of! and yet he can waste the X-men at any moment..." Blech!
From: dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu (David Henry)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: MORE X-ECUTIONER'S SONG SPOILERS
Date: 28 Sep 92 17:53:13 GMT
Article-I.D.: plains.20755
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

>My idea of Mr. Sinister:  He's the most interesting villain the x-men have
>gone against in quite a while.  (I rank him up there with Magneto, Nimrod,
>and the Master Mold---Dr. Doom doesn't count since they never met the real
>one.)

This comes as a surprise to this Doom fan, considering his appearance in
the semi-blah X-Men vs. Fantastic Four LS.
-- 
David R. Henry - Rogue Fan Club - CTHULHU in '92! Why vote for LESSER evils?
For Kate is a jealous God, and requires sacrifice./What was your question?--K
"All you of Earth are IDIOTS!"-P9fOS // Thanks... for the memories.--Rogue
dhenry@plains.nodak.edu * ud137927@ndsuvm1.bitnet * ud137927@vm1.nodak.edu
From: barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: The Acolytes (was Re: Cable as Nathan, and traitor)
Date: 28 Sep 92 10:59:08 CDT
Distribution: na
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <lewandow.717480065@cs.wisc.edu>, lewandow@floss.cs.wisc.edu (Gary Lewandowski [TSoD]) writes:
> In <1992Sep24.140635.2626@wkuvx1.bitnet> barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:

> Anyway, there'll be a crossover next year
>>between X-MEN and AVENGERS featuring the Acolytes, in which they
>>decide to go after Luna (Magneto's granddaughter) and use her to carry
>>on his legacy.  Unfortunately, they don't know she doesn't have powers
 
> Incorrect.  The concern is that the Acolytes go after Luna to kill her.
> The Acolytes tout mutantkind's superiority over other humans, with Magneto
> as their 'Savior.'  His *human* grandchild is a blemish on his superiority.
> Thus, it would be best if she were eliminated and forgotten.

Yeah, that's what I got from Avengers #350 myself, but in an interview
in MARVEL AGE, Harras said they're after her but they _don't_ know she
doesn't have powers.  Go figure.
  My opinion is that he was originally (when he wrote #350) going to
have them try to kill her, but later decided it would be a better
story to have a kidnapping.

                                       -Drizzt
 
************************************************************************
Jeff Barnes                   "Mike, if my father were alive today, you
Western Kentucky University          know what he'd say?"
BarneJD@WKUVX1.BITNET         "'Help, help, get me out of this coffin'?"
                                                  -SPIDER-MAN 2099 #1
My opinions are not necessarily those of WKU, but they should be!  :+)
************************************************************************
From: joak@ocf.berkeley.edu (Jonathan A. Kung)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Sinister
Date: 7 Oct 1992 04:12:08 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
NNTP-Posting-Host: planecrash.berkeley.edu

In a previous life, barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet mentions:
>Three problems with this otherwise likable theory:
[that the technovirus comes from Doug's and Warlock's remains]
...Skipping two of them to get to the one on which I'd like to spout.
>  3) Sinister says it is a "piece of the future".  Cypherlock's
>remains just don't fit the bill.

Okay, so maybe I haven't picked up my X-books in a while, and maybe
reading these posts before I have read them might be a bad idea, but
I don't see the problem with Siniter saying it is a "piece of the
future," because perhaps in the future when "Cypherlock" (bleah, even
worse than "Douglock" or "Warlas") is around, Doug's mutants remains
have combined with Warlock's "mutant" (using the term loosely) remains
to produce a new strain of mutating technovirus, sort of like that
Croyd dude in the Wild Cards universe, that is constantly changing.
Thus, some nasty could have hopped into the future and snagged some of
Cyplock's live technocells and hopped back into the present.  That way,
Sinister isn't stepping in his mouth by saying that the technovirus is
indeed from the future.

-Jon Kung, could be wrong; it's happened before (once)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: CXMP <CXMP@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA>
Subject: RE: Rachel, Nathan etc...
Organization: McGill University
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 04:24:23 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.171113.26580@decuk.uvo.dec.com> mobey@arrods.enet.dec.com (arrods::mobey) writes:
>    here's a good one for you net folks to think over....
>
>    Rachel wasn't an only child
>    in an issue of one or other of the comics she has a flash
>    "back"
>    she has TWO <--------
>    brothers   twins ...
>    and guess what
>    their names are Christopher and Nathan
>                                    ^^^^^^
Aha!  So Cable/Stryfe could be *our* Nathan and Mr. Sinister could
be the other.  Anyone know what issue is being referred to here?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                ! Address as above or use
Martin Phipps                   ! LOULA@hep.physics.mcgill.ca or simply
                                ! MUHEP::LOULA if you're on a VAX
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terminal freeze, duplicate posts, lost posts and email-come-posts,
these are a few of my least favorite things.
Organization: Freshman, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 12:51:11 -0400 
From: "Michael J. Keating" <mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: MORE X-ECUTIONER'S SONG SPOILERS

Why would Sinister trade Scott and Jean for their genetic material when
he could just as easily take the material from them himself?  That makes
zero sense!  However, it would make things very interesting if it turned
out that the genetic material he traded for would eventually be used to
create Stryfe!  I'm just dreaming though.  It makes very little sense
for Stryfe to give Sinister the means to have himself created, or does
it?  Too many  possibilities....
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: The Jamie/Siryn thing
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 21:41:38 GMT

The way I took the scene, was that the two were friends but never developed 
the type of relationship that we think (or maybe Jamie wanted-hmmm).  Later
on, after she's been captured and injured, Jamie is shown looking at her with
a sorta "Gosh, maybe I do still care for her/ I hope she's ok look on his face.)

Of course this is all IMHO, and it's another one of those debates that will rage
untill PAD posts one line about it and kills the whole discussion. :-)

----SCAVENGER

-- 
KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: dbrod@eng.clemson.edu (douglas brod)
Subject: Re: Ideas to help the mutants (was: Re: X-cutio
Reply-To: dbrod@eng.clemson.edu
Organization: College of Engineering, Clemson Univ.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 20:13:20 GMT

>2.  No more time travelling.  Period.  Good time travel stories require 
>extremely tight plotting with very careful attention to detail and
>continuity,
>which the current X-books do not have.  Also, characters with time-travel
>on demand are just too powerful - see Bill & Ted (dude - we gotta remember
>to
>leave some keys here for us - excellent! here they are!).
>all.

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Kevin Maguire                         No, not THAT Kevin Maguire
>maguire@copland.jpl.nasa.gov          I'm a rocket scientist, not an artist

Why don't the X-Books have an appearance from the "Time Variane Authority" from
Fantastic Four?  They could come in, kill off all of the past/future selves, prevent the X-types from time-traveling, clean up any other loose ends, and make the world a better place.  All of our problems would be solved.

Doug Brod
"It's cute!" --Me, upon seeing the alien pop out of the guy's stomach in "Alien".
From: aa719@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Stan M. Mangrum)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: It's coming out WHEN?!?
Date: 6 Oct 1992 03:32:28 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aa719@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Stan M. Mangrum)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, aodn307@bongo.cc.utexas.edu (Joshua Henry Geurink) says:

>
>	Did I read that ad correctly?  The bozos at FOX are waiting until
>OCTOBER 24th to premeire the X-Men animated series?  I mean, according
>to the most recent Wizard the series has already started! (Then again,
>according to Wizard Quantum Leap doesn't premeire until next week. Hmmmm.)
>I originally heard "It'll be a little bit late," but OCTOBER 24!!!!?

My brother saw a commercial on Fox today saying the first episode
would be shown this upcoming Saturday, October 10th. Our local
tv guide concurs. (10am)

St.
-- 
Stan M.Mangrum, Assistant Sysop     | "And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, 
CFN Collectibles SIG / Comics FORUM |  do all in the name of the Lord Jesus,
INET : aa719@cleveland.freenet.edu  |  giving thanks to God and the Father by
[BROWNS, CAVS....& INDIANS IN '92!] |  him."               - Colossians 3:17
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: zell@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Joseph Zell)
Subject: Re: Maverick
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 04:48:31 GMT

fozman@netlink.cts.com (Vahid Fozi) writes:


>So far, I thought that by far the best among the new X-Men stories was 
>the one about Omega Red. And, as some of you might have guessed, what 
>thrilled me the most about them was the mysterious new man, Maverick! Not 
>only does he know more about the past of Sabretooth and Wolverine than 
>any other character, but he oozes ... well, he oozes machismo (corny as 
>it sounds). I was wondering if anybody knew anything about plans to 
>continue Maverick. I've read the two-part Maverick series where he kills 
>that doctor for Barrington, but I haven't had the chance to read any of 
>the comics past number 9, because my mom is sooooo cheap. Anybody have 
>any idea?

I too have been fascinated by Maverik. And I went nuts when I read the last two
issues of Wolverine. Pick them up. It's more than worth it. I framed the last
page of the first of the two.(Don't know numbers, sorry). Well, not really,
but I thought about it. :)
Joe

>--                    
>INTERNET:  fozman@netlink.cts.com (Vahid Fozi)
>UUCP:   ...!ryptyde!netlink!fozman
>NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115
-- 
zell@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu  * "Never fear, Duncan. Good will overcome.
Joe Zell               * Trust in that.."
CUBS WIN! CUBS WIN!    *   -Sir Locksley, *Robin Hood, Prince of Theives*
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: THE CLAREMONT FILES (Doug & Betsy)
Date: 28 Sep 92 03:48:11 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Sep24.202609.2060@bvc.edu> daikerjohnc@bvc.edu writes:
>
>>>>and the Black Panther...  Betsy and Doug, Betsy and Peter, Betsy and Scott a
>>>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>>Wait...Psylocke & Cypher?  When was this?
>
>>The New Mutants annual with Mojo where Psylocke got her bionic eyes.
>>(Sorry, I can't remember the annual number right now.)  It's the one
>>where Mojo is kidnapping children (Sunspot, Karma's brother and
>>sister, the kids who appear infrequently in Daredevil, etc.) by getting
>>them hooked on his "Wildways" cartoon, and then dragging them off
>>to Mojoworld and turning them into superpowered agents.  Doug saves
>>Psylocke, and Psylocke mentally scans him and finds out that he's
>>got some serious feelings for her, despite the fact that she was
>>almost twice as old as him.  Never really followed up on.
>
>   Yeah, it had Alan Davis artwork, right? It was great.
>   They also mentioned it in the X-Men annual they introduced Longshot in.

Obscure Trivia Lad wishes to point out that Longshot was introduced
in Longshot #1.  You're referring to the issue where he joins the
X-Men, which was not his introduction.

>Psylocke, possessed by Mojo, tries to possess him, and reads in his
>thoughts the love Doug feels for her, and she realizes the love she feels for
>him. The kids also appear in this issue as audience members. Arthur Adams art.

Yep, along with the frogs from Thor, Carrie (Robin from Dark Knight
Returns) and her friend (Obscure Trivia Lad can't remember her name
right now.  Damn weakness!), and some other "cameos."

>   She also dreamt about Doug and her love for him in the X-Men issue where 
>she was being taken over by the Hand. Jim Lee art. 
>   Plus, didn't the kids appear in the Longshot mini-series?

Obscure Trivia Lad doesn't recall this, but he also hasn't read the
Longshot mini-series in a while, so that doesn't mean anything.

-- 
"Dog bites man--that's not a story.  Man bites dog--*that's* a story.  And
if the dog and the man slug it out for six issues, and then Wolverine shows
up for a guest appearance, and the dog turns out to be a mutant, that's a
*Marvel* story!"			-Marvel Editorial Handbook
From: uplink@cwis.unomaha.edu (John M. Scheibeler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Fox's X-MEN animated release date
Date: 7 Oct 92 00:17:14 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha


	I've been seeing commercials that state X-men animated will 
premiere Saturday morning, October 24.  They don't show but a second
of animation; the two bits I've seen is Wolverine ripping out of a
coat and Storm summoning up lightning powers.  Not enough animation
to make any sort of opinion about the quality of animation.

uplink
.s
From: masulliv@ecs.umass.edu (Michael Sullivan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: X-Cutioner's Song
Date: 26 Sep 92 14:43:45 GMT

In article <1992Sep25.111843.2654@wkuvx1.bitnet>, barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
> In article <92268.161504EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu>, Ernie Oporto <EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> 
>> And since Shatterstar is no longer among the
>> living, I find it doubtful that they'll be winning any battles soon.
> 
> Oh c'mon, there's _no way_ he's dead.  This is the guy who stuck a
> sword through himself to ace an enemy in NM#100.  Do you _really_
> think they're going to off him, especially given Fabian's ideas for
> the future in X-FORCE Annual #1?  (Yeah, it's "alternate" but I think
> it's a pretty good idea of where he's headed).
>                                             -Drizzt
I have to agree here.  I was surprised that everyone said that he was dead.
Afterall, this is a MUTANT who was only seemingly impaled, in a MARVEL comic.
No mention of him even dieing was made in the rest of the comic.  I'm
surprised everyone thought he was dead.  I'll wait until I see him in the
Legion of the Unliving, thanks.  (course, that's no sure sign either)
						Mike S
From: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: General Ideas
Date: 28 Sep 92 21:39:37 GMT
Reply-To: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <90716@netnews.upenn.edu> dmcclue@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Patrick McClue) writes:
>The writing in the X-Books haven't been that great lately (with the exception
>of Excalibur).  There are too many characters who are not acting like they
>used to and doing very *stupid* things.

  Agreed, though it's getting somewhat better since the X-odus.  Oh,
if only Bob Harras would move on to some other position, and his
replacement could convince Claremont to come back, replacing
Lobdell...I'd leave Nicieza on, he's a reasonable writer.

>I wouldn't mind seeing Amara back, but won't feel bad if she doesn't.
>
>It would be cool to find her married.  That would bind her to Nova Roma in
>case no one wants to use her.

  Rumor has it that she'll be returning in NEW WARRIORS after the
current arc is over, to attend the Hellions' funeral--hopefully she'll
rejoin the New Mut^H^H^H^H^H^H^HX-Force after this is over, as Nicieza
is writing both.

>I always wanted to see some relationship between Siryn and Wolfsbane...after
>all, her adopted mother is "kinda dating" Siryn's father...which would make
>them sisters in some way.

  I think Moira isn't Rahne's adopted mother, just her legal guardian.

Jonathan Lennox
jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
Organization: Senior, Mathematics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Date: Mon,  5 Oct 1992 13:46:31 -0400 
From: Gregg Bradley Baimel <gb1r+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Fallen Angels

What exactly happened in the Fallen Angels miniseries?  I have just
started re-reading X-Factor (actually, I bought & read #74-83 last
night) and I'm curious about Jamie's past.  Any help, posted or emailed,
is appreciated.

Bert


/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Gregg B. Baimel, but you can call me Bert.  Everyone else does.
gb1r+@andrew.cmu.edu                                                 ___   _
1057 Morewood Ave., Pittsburgh Pa., 15213             Pi Lambda Phi  | |/\(|)
(412) 268-5442                                                             -
"Well anyway, the thing is, what I really mean..."
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
From: jchiu@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (James Chiu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: The X-Men Adventures
Date: 3 Oct 92 00:34:28 GMT
Organization: Virginia Tech Computer Science Dept, Blacksburg, VA

lawrence@ctron.com (Gary St. Lawrence) writes:
> Two things I noticed during my trip to The Purple Penguin (my local
> comics impresario): First --
> 	The X-Men Adventures (*based on the "hot, new animated
> television series"*) came out. Nice cover, although I haven't read
> the book yet as I whipped through Iron Man, Guardians of the Galaxy,
> Guy Gardner #1 and a few others last night.
> 	Question: Where the h-e-double hockey sticks is the bloody
> television show? Fox has it included in just about evert commercial,
> except for those DAMNED Fred Penner and "It's Potty Time" annoyances.
> During premiere week, you couldn't go five minutes without the 
> "everybody knows it's on Fox" commercial (including Wolverine).
> 	So far I haven't seen a single advertisement for just the
> X-Men cartoon by itself. Is Fox just yanking our chains or is this
> show actually going to air?

The X-men adventures television series should start on october 3 or
if not, on october 10 (every saturday) on FOX, 10:00 am.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: mobey@arrods.enet.dec.com (arrods::mobey)
Subject: Rachel, Nathan etc...
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 18:12:28 GMT
X-Posted-Via: NEWS-NOTES gateway (a hack!)

    
    
    here's a good one for you net folks to think over....
    
    Rachel wasn't an only child
    in an issue of one or other of the comics she has a flash
    "back" 
    she has TWO <--------
    brothers   twins ...
    and guess what
    their names are Christopher and Nathan
    
    I doubt this is where Cable and Stryth come from
    but what the heck...
    
    short of going through my collection of xbooks
    etc... I cant find where it was done prob U-x
    
    Gary M
From: lazarus@vulcan.ksu.ksu.edu ()
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Pronunciation of Fabian Nicieza
Date: 30 Sep 1992 01:16:04 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: vulcan.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <Sep.28.21.27.15.1992.12470@dorm.rutgers.edu>, jgreene@dorm.rutgers.edu (Jeffrey Greene) writes:
>How to pronounce "Nicieza": nee-see-eh-sa

Okay... now say Sienkiewicz!  >:)

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
'Cats - 35, Temple - 14... a MUCH more satisfying win!  :)
"Think about it... after you spend a day in a society whose prevailing
	philosophy is 'Why make small problems when you can create a holocaust,'
	then you must navigate your way home with a society who maintains the
	same philosophy in their driving..." 
				-- "Frank's Chair" -- 2nu -- Ponderous
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: MHANNINEN@finabo.abo.fi (Mika H{nninen Inf)
Subject: Re: Pronunciation of Fabian Nicieza
Organization: Abo Akademi University, Finland
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 22:02:03 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.23

In <20823@plains.NoDak.edu> dhenry@plains.NoDak.edu writes:

> In article <1abgn4INN2dc@vulcan.ksu.ksu.edu> lazarus@vulcan.ksu.ksu.edu writes:
> >
> >In article <Sep.28.21.27.15.1992.12470@dorm.rutgers.edu>, jgreene@dorm.rutgers.edu (Jeffrey Greene) writes:
> >>How to pronounce "Nicieza": nee-see-eh-sa
> >
> >Okay... now say Sienkiewicz!  >:)
> 
> Shen-kah-witz
  SIN-KEV-VICH
(gesundheit!)

> 
> (Bless you!)
> (You're welcome!)
> 
> -- 
> David R. Henry - Rogue Fan Club - CTHULHU in '92! Why vote for LESSER evils?
> For Kate is a jealous God, and requires sacrifice./What was your question?--K
> "All you of Earth are IDIOTS!"-P9fOS // Thanks... for the memories.--Rogue
> dhenry@plains.nodak.edu * ud137927@ndsuvm1.bitnet * ud137927@vm1.nodak.edu

			-Mika
P.S. Can you say "nit pick"?
From: sl859@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Shatterstar Dead....Muhahahahaha
Date: 5 Oct 92 16:08:23 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

> *sigh* I guess making it a requirement that all Marvel writers
> must play Champions is out of the question?
> Axly
   I really think this would add an element that Marvel lacks!  I just
started on it and I can see where it would be ideal to comic writers!
(Of course the guys at Marvel are probably all power gamers!)
						wReam...
					     Ultimate Ninja!

P.S.  One thing Champions doesnt allow very forgivingly is skin
tight bullet/impact proof costumes :(