HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: operbwt@rosevc.rose-hulman.edu (Barry W Trottier)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The annoying fucker with his redskins posts..
Date: 14 Dec 1992 00:52:19 GMT
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Distribution: world
Reply-To: operbwt@rosevc.rose-hulman.edu (Barry W Trottier)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra.rose-hulman.edu
Keywords: Annoying redskins


In article <1992Dec13.223633.14346@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA) writes:
|> Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
|> Path: master.cs.rose-hulman.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!ames!pacbell.com!jpglori
|> From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
|> Subject: Re: The annoying fucker with his redskins posts..
|> Message-ID: <1992Dec13.223633.14346@PacBell.COM>
|> Keywords: Annoying redskins
|> Sender: news@PacBell.COM (Pacific Bell Netnews)
|> Organization: Pacific * Bell
|> References: <1ggbtnINNa4r@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
|> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 22:36:33 GMT
|> Lines: 17
|> 
|> In article <1ggbtnINNa4r@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> iav@po.cwru.edu writes:
|> >Hmm... Seeing the consistency of his postings it would seem that he had
|> >a program set up to post his post to the newsnet... Therefore..
|> >It is highly possible that he left his machine on, and it has been
|> >posting it every 5 minutes (by itself).. Personnaly, I can't think
|> >of anyone that would sit there for that long posting messages..
|> >*chuckle*
|> >ps..
|> >Screw all the other teams.. Saints will prevail!
|> >
|> 
|> Yeah, this annoying little fucker has really pissed off
|> the FOOTBALL GODS and his annoying posts are a major JINX!
|> -- 
|>  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
|> 	"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
|>   is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
|> 

I think what happened is he just bamboozeled(sp?) the FBG's with his verbosity.
The FBG's couldn't think straight and accidently cursed the Cowboys instead.

Well, happy days are here again!  Niners clinched it today IMO.

In fact I would pretty much count on home field advantage for the Niners! :) :)

--------------
Go Niners!
Go Elway!

Barry Trottier
e-mail:  operbwt@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Scoring Leaders (was: Re: Benchmark = OJ)
Keywords: worshipmorastill
Date: 17 Dec 92 23:20:59 GMT
Organization: .

(David Nix) writes:
>>And on the subject of scoring, any of you trivia/stat hounds out there
>>remember who scored (and how many) the most points in a season?  Who
>>scored the most points in a season with no TD's (how many)? And an easy
>
>I don't know who owns the NFLs all-time season scoring record, but Gino
>Capalletti of the AFL Boston Patriots scored 178 points back around 1961.
>He was a starting running back and handled all of their kicking.  If I
>remember correctly he had 8 or 9 touchdowns plus all of the FGs and PATs.

All-time season scoring record:
Paul Hornung, GB, 1960 -- 176 points.

Cappelletti's best was in 1964, 155 points. (Patriots record)

All-time non-TD season scoring record:
Mark Moseley, WA, 1983 -- 161 points.

--J.J.
(dreading darryl the talley & co.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 07:50:07 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
From: dmclelan@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu
Date: 15 Dec 92 20:52:21 CST
Organization: Wichita State University, Wichita, Ks

In article <1992Dec13.135159.1130@Princeton.EDU>, hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan) writes:
> In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>
>>
>>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>>
> 
> Joe who ?
> 
> :-) 
> -- 
> **************************************************************************
> Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
> Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
> Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)

      I now Know that Princeton is Having A problem with the Posting.

    So after 200+ of these postings We are going to HAve to :-) (grin) and live 
with it until it gets under control!!
  
___________________________________________________________________________

 Go Chiefs!!! Go Chiefs!!!! Go Chiefs!!!! Go Shocks (not Football) Go Chiefs!!

___________________________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com (Bob Ashley)
Subject: How to Place Your Wild Cards ...
Reply-To: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com
Organization: GTE Federal Systems Division
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 16:34:12 GMT

In article 28575@oasys.dt.navy.mil,  kilpat@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Andrew Kilpatrick) writes:
>
>I now this could get somewhat involved but could
>someone out there please tell me how they decide
>to arrange the playoff schedule.  I know it has
>something to do with best teams playing worst teams
>and very best getting a bye.  But could anyone set
>it out clearly who plays who, the first round and
>second round etc.
>

Let's try this approach ... for each conference, six teams make it to
the playoffs ... let's seed them one through six as follows:

	1 - Division Winner, Best Record
	2 - Division Winner, 2nd Best Record
	3 - Division Winner, Worst Record
	4 - Wild Card Team, Best Record
	5 - Wild Card Team, 2nd Best Record
	6 - Wild Card Team, 3rd Best Record

The first two seeds get the week off ... the matchups are 3-6 and 4-5.
The two winners are then placed under the following criteria ...

	The lower seeded team must travel to the top seed, while the
	higher seeded team travels to the number two seeded team,
	regardless of divisonal affiliation.

Your potential second round matchups could be:

	1-6, 2-4
	1-6, 2-5
	2-3, 1-4
	2-3, 1-5

For the conference championship, the higher seeded team will host the
lower seeded team.  Note that it *IS* possible for a wildcard team to
host this game ...

Insert the appropriate teams after 28 December 1992 ...


Bob - grok?   :-)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Ashley                        Internet:  Bob.Ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com

Member, Technical Staff            | Winter Bowling Leagues 1992-1993
   GTE Federal Systems Division    |    GTE FSD Mixed Secretary: Thu 17:45
   15000 Conference Center Drive   |    Thursday Mixups:         Thu 20:30
   Chantilly, VA   22021-3808      |    NFL Mixed Secretary:     Mon 21:00
   (703)-818- voice 4656  FAX 5484 |    Fantasy Bowling League:  Team #1
From: newson@sequent.com (Newson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Tim Harris -- Rootin' Tootin' 9'er
Date: 15 Dec 92 18:51:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: sequent.1992Dec15.185130.11114
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Dec15.073213.15159@microsoft.com> richs@microsoft.com (Rick Schaut) writes:
>I recall Tim Harris saying that he wasn't going to perform his
>gun-slinging celebrations anymore saying that he had left his "guns" in
>Green Bay.  I asl recall him saying that the Packers management had
>pressured him to continue the displays whenever he recorded a QB sack.
>Indeed, it was not without a few pejorative hints as to the character of
>Packer fans that Harris disavowed any further connection with slinging
>guns.
>
>Yet, as I watched the highlights of last Sunday's game between the 9ers and
>the Vikings, what do I see but Timmy Harris slingin' the guns after a QB
>sack.
>
>Which begs the question.  Which is it, Harris?  Now that the league's
>restrictions on your celebrations have been lifted (no longer enforced?),
>how is it that you return to a practice which you had led us to believe was
>not something you had chosen to do of your own volition?
>
>Folks, I think I'm pleased that such hypocricy is in San Francisco where it
>belongs.

What a joke! Who gives a shit what you think! Your obvisouly having a hard time
coping with the 9ers success this year, and this is a silly way to vent it!
If Harris wants to start slinging his 6 shooters, let him.

>
>
>-- 
>Rick Schaut
>UUCP:...{uunet | uw-beaver}!microsoft!richs
>
>Microsoft doesn't speak for me, and I don't speak for Microsoft.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 16:10:08 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hariharn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ramesh Hariharan)
Subject: Re: `Redskins Repeat !!!
Originator: news@nimaster
Keywords: To all non-Redskin fans, after the Redskins beat up on the Cowboys this 
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 17:20:08 GMT

In article <XaR=Y4-@engin.umich.edu> sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
>In article <Bz43LI.Cuv@andy.bgsu.edu> dlingle@orchestra.bgsu.edu (Donald Lingle) writes:
>>Sunday, Beware Of The Super Bowl Champs!
>>    I will agree that the Skins are having an up and down season thus far.  But 
>>if we beat the Cowboys this Sunday, you must agree that the Redskins will look 
>>pretty good for repeating as Super Bowl Champs.
>>    The skins have had a bunch of injuries, combined with the late pre-season 
>>start of Mark Rypien.  Some of our players are now returning, (Darrell Green,
>>Jim Lachey), and Rypien's coming out of his slump.
>>    I'm happy to see the Cowboys and Redskins games now mean something.  Before
>>last year, Cowboy fans would hide the week before a Redskin vs. Cowboys game. 
>>As for the 49ers, Vikings, Eagles, Packers, & Saints, I know you would love to 
>>go get a easy Super Bowl victory against an AFC team, but you'll have to wait 
>>for Joe Gibbs to retire or better yet, coach your team.
>>    Well, good luck to all NFL fans.  I am just "touring" the user group.  This
>>id actually belongs to a Pittsburgh Steeler's Fan.
>
>
>Well, I too hope the 'Skins thrash the Cowpokes. Personally, I don't care for/
>hate either. All I'm concerned about is the 49ers - more specifically Montana.
>I'm one of those weirdos who has never seen Montana in action - here's hoping
>the 49ers secure home field advantage before their last game so that I can have
>the pleasure of watching Joe for the first time.
>

Joe who ?

:-) 
-- 
**************************************************************************
Ramesh Hariharan , Chem Engg. Dept., Princeton Univ. 
Research topic : Stabilization of Colloids using diblock copolymers.
Research baap : Bill Russel (no ! not the Celtic legend)
From: operbwt@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu(Barry Trottier)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Joe Montana to start next week??
Date: 15 Dec 1992 05:50:04 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: operbwt@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: g222-17.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

In article <1gje9qINN63e@morrow.stanford.edu> GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu  
(Sullivan) writes:
> In article <Bz9u3F.Eq@unixhub.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>,
> vallury@mesun2.SLAC.Stanford.EDU (Vallury Prabhakar) writes:
> >
> >The SF Chronicle today had something about George Seifert's
> >comments on Joe Montana.  Apparently Joe seems "game-ready"
> >and GS said that he will almost certainly activate JM for
> >next weeks' game against Tampa Bay.  Whether Joe will actually
> >play or not is unclear.
> 
> He'll play, but not start.  Even Joe says he doesn't expect to
> start, Steve is playing too well, but hopes he gets some gametime
> reps.  Don't expect to see him until Detroit.

What a team! :)  Joe Montana playing possible "garbage" time! :)

Niners are a shoo-in.  Also, I noticed in another article that the Niners are  
WAY odds on favorites to take the SB! :)

Rollin', Rollin', Rollin'...

------------
Go Niners!
Go Elway!

Barry Trottier
e-mail:  operbwt@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
From: rege@bongo.Berkeley.EDU (Ashutosh G. Rege)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Tim Harris -- Rootin' Tootin' 9'er
Date: 17 Dec 1992 23:03:54 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: bongo.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Dec15.213634.24943@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> jmartens@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Jeffrey D Martens) writes:
 >In article <1992Dec15.185130.11114@sequent.com> newson@sequent.com (Newson) writes:
 >>In article <1992Dec15.073213.15159@microsoft.com> richs@microsoft.com (Rick Schaut) writes:
 >
 >>>Folks, I think I'm pleased that such hypocricy is in San Francisco where it
 >>>belongs.
 >
 >>What a joke! Who gives a shit what you think! Your obvisouly having a hard time
 >>coping with the 9ers success this year, and this is a silly way to vent it!
 >>If Harris wants to start slinging his 6 shooters, let him.
 >
 >Having read Rick's article, I don't think Newson's deduction that
 >Rick is "obvisouly [sic] having a hard time coping with the 9ers
 >success" is well-founded.  There's nothing in Rick's article to
 >suggest he cares one way or the other about the 9ers success.
 >He's just pointing out that Harris was a tad dishonest in some of
 >his criticisms of Packer management.
 >
 >As a Packer fan, I'm just glad that Green Bay kept the better of
 >their two weak-side OLBs:  Tony Bennett.  Harris has not been
 >missed.
 >

 C'mon you guys are just sore that you lost one of the better 
 linebackers in the league for a mere low 2nd round pick and to top
 it, it seems that Tim Harris has cleaned up his off-field
 act and in fact seems to be far better adjusted to his team-mates
 than Charles Haley. (Incidentally, one probable reason Harris had his 
 six-shooters out instead of folding them under his arms is that
 he was back on his old hunting grounds)

 Ashu Rege
 P.S. Who _did_ Green Bay get for the 2nd rounder ?
From: jh2i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Joseph Theodore Helmsen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Redskins vs Cowboys
Date: 14 Dec 92 16:56:35 GMT
Organization: Masters student, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


    Every Cowboy supporter on the net has been saying how the Cowboys outplayed
the Redskins.  I would like to offer another interpretation.  Any team that
turns the ball over 5 times in one game deserves to lose.  What this says to
me is that the Cowboys are good at marching up and down the field.  However,
when they really needed to score, they were unable to.  I'll grant you that
the endzone play was bizarre, at the very least.  However, a "dominant" team
should be able to overcome that.  The cowboys were not able to.

Joe
From: ahmed@uts.amdahl.com (Syed S. Ahmed)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Watters status????
Date: 17 Dec 92 00:37:41 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1go6ijINN50j@morrow.stanford.edu>, GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullivan) writes:
> In article <1992Dec16.183826.29369@neocad.com>,
> bill@neocad.com (Bill Bentley) writes:
> >Will Ricky Watters play this week????
> 
> According to the papers, he claimed he was still hurting.  He feels
> no hurry to come back since Lee is playing so well.  There is
> nothing definite but he won't start.
> 
> Mike

Ricky Watters doesn't seem to be too pleased with Amp Lee's performance 
against the Vikings (134 yards rushing and 2 TDs). When asked by the press
about Lee's performance, his reply was "I have no comments".

I don't see why he should feel so intimidated. Obviously when he's healthy,
he is going to get his job back. 

--
sabeel - A 4TNiner Fan
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Packer News / Moran may be activated
Date: 15 Dec 1992 16:54:50 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsd.csd.mu.edu

Hi there
Becoz of the injury to Tootie Robbins 
Off. Lineman Rich Moran may be activated from IR.
Since GB can make only one move before the regular
season end this will prevent Workman from playing
in the 2 games left. The Coaches have a dfecision to 
make.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: caldwell@epcot.spdc.ti.com (Wayne Caldwell)
Subject: Any Lions Fans out there?
Organization: TI Semiconductor Process and Design Center
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 20:55:43 GMT


I need help! Is Willie Green going to be suspended for the Chicago game. I need
to know if I can start him in our fantasy football game this week.

Email me any answers to:

Wayne Caldwell
EMAIL = caldwell@epcot.spdc.ti.com
From: malesov@aud.alcatel.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cost of Season Tickets?
Date: 17 Dec 92 21:52:02 GMT

operbwt@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu (Barry Trottier) writes:
.
.
.
>I was wondering what the cost of season tickets is.  (If there is a distinction  
>between teams, I would like to know that, and I would also like to know the  
>prices for the "cheap" seats and the better seats.)

Dallas Cowboys Ticket prices are as follows:
$31 - between the 20 yard lines, lower level and 1st 10 rows upper level.
$29 - all other sideline seats.
$25 - all end zone seats.

There is no price break for buying season tickets, so the season ticket
rate is 11 games (3 pre-season and 8 regular-season) times the cost of
the single game tickets.

If you are lucky enough to have the "blue" parking passes (which allow
you to park right by Texas Stadium), that is another additional $10 per
game.

So a pair of tickets between the 20's with blue parking runs $792.

This year was a little more expensive than last year, since there were
only 2 home pre-season games last year for a total of 10 home games.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell Malesovas				Alcatel Network Systems
malesov@sooner.aud.alcatel.com			Richardson, TX
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Subject: Re: The Dynasty Continues..........
Organization: Houses of the Holy
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 21:12:24 GMT

In article <1giiubINNpp1@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, lpc4@po.CWRU.Edu (Lawrence P. Colucci) writes:
> 
> ONe of the main reasons that the 49ers win much of the time is the
> smae thing that is happening to baseball - money.  The owner of the

I dont think that money is happening to baseball. The Pirates are one
of the smallest markets; they dont even fill up the stadium, yet they
just win baby.

Atlanta is much smaller than the NY teams and the LA teams yet has been
to the past two World Series.  Also, as you point out below, the 
Steelers are winning with a low payroll.

All this just goes to show that there is no conclusive evidence 
(note the KC signings of 3 yrs ago; baseball not football,KC had
both the Cy Young's) that money has anything to do with winning.

> them as a team, you have to respect the Steelers, who have the lowest
> budget in football.  I just feel sorry for them when Foster's contract
> comes up - right now he is making $113,000 a year; Jim Harbaugh makes
> more than that in two weeks.  Bench warming linemen make more than
> that.  There will never again even be close to parity in the NFL, and
> we are all to blame.


-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cbarthol@ssf-sys.DHL.COM (Cris Bartholomew)
Subject: Re: BEST team wins Re: Dallas vs Skins
Reply-To: cbarthol@ssf-sys.DHL.COM (Cris Bartholomew)
Organization: DHL
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 22:35:40 GMT

It's too bad that all you Cowgirl fans insist on living in the past!
Who cares that the 1-15 Cowgirls beat the Skins in 1989!!
The Skins Came up with a big win when it counted. Nuff Said!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro