HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: desiree@netcom.com (dmc)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Favorite Groups
Summary: Detachable Penis
Date: 25 Jan 93 19:34:36 GMT
Organization: TSAMC

In article <1993Jan25.180036.7277@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:

>No, you're not--actually, I rather like knowing a little bit about the
>tastes of the people I've gotten familiar with over the net; it's nice
>to get a glimpse into their spirits from a slightly different angle
>(even ones who claim not to be a net.personality). 

	Duoy.  My comment about speaking on behalf of the world was
intended to stop those from jumping in and saying "but you're not
speaking on behalf of me" -- obviously it didn't work.  Simply put,
I was stating that I realized I was *not* speaking on behalf of anybody
else but myself.  Alas, the twist didn't take the intended turn.

	And that's all cool and groovy if you like to read long 
alphabetical lists -- tis your preference.  Ain't mine.  And as long
as they crop up, I will say, I don't like it.  I fail to see how a list
showing nearly every popular top 40 group over the past ten years can
give insight into a person, but whatever...

> (For that matter,
>I rather like Jesus Christ Superstar as well, though I like the version
>with the blue album cover better than the one with the brown album
>cover.)

	I wouldn't know.  It's not my taste in music personally.  I
gave it a listen a time or two and decided it wasn't my cup o' tea.

>It's not as if the topic of music hasn't come up on soc.singles many 
>times before (oddly enough without anyone leaping into personal attacks
>on the people discussing the subject)--I've even been inspired by some
>of the comments on the subject made by such notables as Rob Thurlow,
>John Fereira, and Charlie Martin enough to go down to the local record
>store and buy copies of albums they were discussing. 

	Yea?  So?  You're talking about a discussion.  Was Davey's 
dump a discussion of his tastes -- or just a gagging list of groups?
Two different things.  And yea, Rob's got cool taste in music.  
(and yea, that's a suckup...)  John's cool too (suckup II); I don't
know Charlie and I don't suck those I don't know.

>Trygve   (Have you considered switching to decaffeinated?)

	Close.  I was undergoing a massive nicotine fit.  Got any
'ludes?

Whatever,

Desiree
From: paydayyt@mindbender.Eng.Sun.COM (Scott Cooke)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Credibility...
Date: 27 Jan 93 18:07:06 GMT
Reply-To: paydayyt@mindbender.Eng.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: mindbender

In article 8349@netcom.com, marcia@netcom.com (Marcia) writes:
>In article <C1GIDB.8pp@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>>But... if the right person comes along when a relationship isn't high
>>on one's list of priorities, one might miss them entirely.
>
>Then, by definition, they aren't the right one. The right one would have the
>right timing, too, or s/he wouldn't be the right one. The timing would be
>all wrong.
>
>Then again, I don't believe in just one "right person" for anyone. I think 
>there are a certain number of potential "right ones" for each person, and 
>missing one doesn't mean you'll never find another. Also, I believe that
>certain people are "right" for others at certain times. Certainly, the men
>who were "right" for me in college are not the men who are "right" for me
>now. The challenge of relationships: not only to be Mr/Ms Right now, but to
>grow and change so that you keep being Mr/Ms Right.

Sometimes as you and your SO grow, you don't grow in the same direction.  Your
wants and desires may go in a completely different direction as that of your
SO.  Your once Mr/Ms Right is no longer Mr/Ms Right.  The question is do you
comprimise on your wants/needs to those of your SO to keep the relationship.
I believe that each person has there own correct answer to this question.

	Scott
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: Credibility and Trueness
Organization: Don't blame me, I voted for Bill 'n' Opus
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:25:11 GMT

In article <ewright.727981082@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>In <1993Jan25.051224.25468@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
>
>>	Seems Charlie owes me a sheepskin. Ed, here's your clue: 4 dates
>>does not constitute a relationship, 
>
>No, but it seems you do qualify for a degree from the Jimmy Dutton
>School of Reading Comprehension.
>
>The dictionary defines relationship as follows: a romantic or 
>passionate attachment.  No mention of time.
>
>You shouldn't try using big words like that unless you know
>what they mean.

Neither should you.  I strongly doubt that anyone here would call
Unrequited Love a Relationship, yet the dictionary definition would seem
to allow that.

Shut up, Ed.  Just shut up.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Kinky vanilla queer het
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: Credibility and Trueness
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 06:06:15 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1993Jan23.005205.18771@sol.UVic.CA> atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (dreas) writes:

>Ed, I wish you some real tough times so that you can have the
>opportunity to learn how to laugh at life instead of whine
>about it. 

He does behave as if nothing really bad had ever happened to him,
doesn't he?

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
"Shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have all of this,
 and, passionate kisses, passionate kisses, passionate kisses, from you?"
- "Passionate Kisses" Lucinda Williams
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (dreas)
Subject: Re: ISObabe
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 04:27:09 GMT

In article 4B2@panix.com, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:

>Dreas has been posting about meeting an ISObabe.  Since I missed the
>definition of that term, I'll suggest several (number 3 is my personal
>favorite).
>
>1. [standards] Someone who meets the International Standards
>Organizations specifications for babeitude.

KeereKt!

>2. [personals] Someone In Search Of a babe.  (This is unlikely; this
>meaning might describe Dreas, not the person he's writing about.)

ISObabes are in search of something but it has not yet been
determined precisely or at all what.

>3. [chemistry] Someone who is just like a babe, except twisted.

Yes, they are rather sinistral like left-handed sugar.

You defined my triple-entendre exactly. Thank you...
(great minds t'ink aHlycke?)

dreas

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Credibility...
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 20:15:56 GMT

In article <ewright.728072203@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>In <1993Jan26.083707.7300@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>
>>>Well, it's a start, but doesn't quite make up for bringing America
>>>all those Gilligan's Island reruns.
>
>>Awww, gee.  Well, lucky for you, we here in the cable TV business are
>>working even now on ways to make sure you don't have to watch "Gilligan's
>>Island" reruns or even episodes of the upcoming series, "Gilligan's
>>Island, the Next Generation."  Later this year, we'll be unveiling the
>>new 24-hour "Leave it to Beaver" channel, 
>
>The scary thing is, Trygve, I'm not sure you're joking.
>
>(Especially after what I've heard about the "Sci-fi Channel.")

Well, you'd best enjoy it while you can--with the steadilly increasing
number of home shopping channels, the viewership of each is going down
and, being a major source of revenue both to the cable TV operator and
to the parent company that owns the shopping channel along with other
more conventional channels, pressure is being applied to the other 
channels to replace their programming with "paid programming" advertising
everything from incredible weight loss programs to astounding hair loss
prevention programs so as not to attract too many people away from the
shopping channels.  Why, before you know it, even the "Leave it to Beaver"
channel may be occupied by "paid programming" sixteen hours a day....

Trygve   (Real headline in Multichannel News (weekly newspaper for the
          cable TV industry):  "MSO [Multiple System Operator] drops
          Playboy Channel from all its systems--claims "too much 
          turnover and not enough penetration.") 
--
.   Coolidge's Observation:  When more and more people are out of work,
unemployment results.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: Honesty, Your word, and Trust -- a crisis?
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 25 Jan 93 20:43:47 GMT

margoli@watson.IBM.com (Larry Margolis) writes:
>If I say I'll meet someone at noon, but I have a flat tire and I'm a
>few minutes late, I don't think any reasonable person would say I've
>broken my word.
>	...
>And unless the person to whom this is said is an anal-retentive git,
>they'll say "that's OK", meaning that they understand that the first
>person made the attempt to do what they said they would, but events
>beyond their control conspired to foil their best effort.

Ok, so let's play with this a moment, shall we?  How about if I was late
because "there was an accident that backed up traffic"?  How about if it
was during rush hour, where such events are relatively common?

If I >really< wanted to be on time, I would allocate plenty of extra time
to cover possible contingencies.  Obviously, not everything rates this
"best effort".  For most things, I will make a trade-off between how much
I want to be on time, how much time I'm willing to waste by being early,
and what the probabilities are of needing "contingency time".

Now, Josh Diamond will contend that I'm being dishonest because I promise
to be on time, but don't put forth my "best effort".  I can accept that.
However, most people (in my experience) will only be upset if there is a
disagreement as to the importance of the meeting, and therefore feel that
I should have allocated more contingency time.

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: what is attractive ?
Date: 27 Jan 93 12:51:21
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
Distribution: usa
	<1993Jan26.193620.29278@cbnewsd.cb.att.com>
	<MARTINC.93Jan26172306@grover.cs.unc.edu>
	<1993Jan27.145528.519@cbnewsd.cb.att.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grover.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com's message of Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:55:28 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.145528.519@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:

   In article <MARTINC.93Jan26172306@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
   >In article <1993Jan26.193620.29278@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
   >
   >   >enough to use sunblock) tans.
   >   No, sun not block.  Sun big round thing in sky.
   >Nance, whatever you put in your coffee today, I want some.

   Cream.  (Not the verb.)

Nah, that can't be it.  That just gives me gas.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
From: jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Breeding Strategy (was meeting women in clubs)
Date: 27 Jan 93 14:22:53 GMT
	<JMD.93Jan22104519@lion.bear.com> <C1HKtq.33H@panix.com>
Organization: Bear, Stearns & Co. - FAST
In-reply-to: sethb@panix.com's message of 27 Jan 93 00:17:49 GMT


In article <C1HKtq.33H@panix.com> sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:

   In article <JMD.93Jan22104519@lion.bear.com> jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond) writes:

   >But really, I'm Spidey!!!, and thus a little worried.  I heard that 
   >female spiders eat their mates after copulation...

   Why do you consider that bad?

Er, perhaps I should reconsider...

As long as I'm eaten, rather than devoured and digested...

Spidey!!!

--
You don't hunt ducks with a turnip! 

 /\ \  / /\  Josh Diamond                                          jmd@bear.com
//\\ .. //\\ AKA Spidey!!!                        ...!ctr.columbia.edu!ursa!jmd
//\((  ))/\\
/  < `' >  \                                              Do whatever it takes.
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: FeMale TransVestitieISM
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 00:09:14 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.191000.9748@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Wall) writes:
>In article <1993Jan25.032514.16329@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>>
>>As a Small Warning, IF she Roars UP on a 
>>Harley with a pack of 'Lucky Green' rolled
>>up in the sleeve, this is NOT the white Knight
>>you've been waiting to take you away.
>
>Wait a minute!  I don't remember anybody saying anything about a white
>Knight.  The Babe on the Harley sounds just fine to me.....

Sure, that's what you think now--but after she sells off your subsidiaries,
liquidates your hard assets, and ravages your pension fund, you'll wish 
you'd waited for that white knight to counter her offer.

Trygve   (We are talking abour corporate raiders, aren't we?)
--
                              R A P T U R E
 
                         September Seventh, 1993
 
      Wars, famine, corruption in government, the decline of family
values, all these and more are threatening our world like never before--
can you honestly look at the world around you and delude yourself into
believing that these are not the very times the ancient prophets
foretold?  The Rapture will occur on September seventh of this year, at
3:00 AM mountain time.  As in previous raptures (most recently the
rapture on October 28th, 1992), not everyone will be saved--only the
chosen ones will ascend into heaven--and like before, the chosen ones
will include car keys, the occasional sock (no more than one per pair),
important phone messages, and a few of those little metal fasteners that
keep cars from falling apart.  So be ready--the Rapture is coming!
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: llk4k@Virginia.EDU ("Lori Karalow")
Subject: Re: How Does your Name Sound?
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 04:03:40 GMT

Okay, my turn, see if you can pronounce my last name......
                     Lori Karalow
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Meeting women in clubs
Date: 23 Jan 93 12:53:49
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
Distribution: usa
	<JMD.93Jan13115529@lion.bear.com> <1jjlbtINN37a@mirror.digex.com>
	<JMD.93Jan20141137@lion.bear.com>
	<MARTINC.93Jan21095216@grover.cs.unc.edu>
	<ewright.727735876@convex.convex.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grover.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: ewright@convex.com's message of Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:51:16 GMT

In article <ewright.727735876@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:

   In <MARTINC.93Jan21095216@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

   >But every time someone proposes a distinction that is particularly "human" -- 
   >language use, tool making, "war", sexual behavior -- there is a primate that has
   >the same behavior, or the clear capability.

   Oh?  Which primates create representational art?  

Thhat's an interesting question.  I imagine you know about the various
chimps etc who paint: at least some of them seem to repeat the same
color and symbol for similar things.  Is that "representational"?  Is it
even "Art"?  I think we get tied up in definitinos that presume hte
conclusion we want to believe.

   Which possess a substantial body of knowledge, or lore, passed down
   from one generation to the next?

Ed, even *cats* do.  Cats have the instincts, but they don't become
efficient hunters unless they're raised by mama cats who are themselves
efficient hunters.

   Which employ the scientific method?

I don't know of any animals who publish referreed journal papers, or who
(he said cynically) write grant proposals.  But I've watched films of
chimps solving problems by attempting a solution, apparently thinking
about why it didn't work, and making a new attempt modifying the
original approach.

   Just because we share some behaviors with apes does not mean mankind
   is just a (not very capable) ape.  Nor does it mean we must artificially
   "ape" their behaviors to be more human.

No, and I didn't after all say that our behaviors are 100 percent
identical.  But it appears to me that our behaviors lie in a clear
*continuum* with the behaviors of the other primates; I suspect the
continuum would be even clearer if we had access to more behavioral
information on proto-hominids.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: Favorite Groups
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 03:57:27 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1993Jan26.141417.15148@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Wall) writes:

>Kay-o, I was just looking out for the overall good of soc.singles.

WOW!  You get to do this?!?!?  I'M IMPRESSED, D00D.  I never ran into
someone in charge of the whole of soc.singles before in my whole eight
years of posting, I mean, usually we have to do that messy stuff of
just speaking for ourselves, y'know?  C00L!  Boy I'm glad I met you -
you should fax me your business card, y'know?

>>	But lose the smiley, I heartedly dislike people that talk outta
>>both sides of their face.

>Hmmmm, didn't know I was.  You took my post as a flame, it wasn't.  I
>don't usually find flaming to accomplish much, although they can be
>humerous sometimes.  The point of the smiley was to lighten the situation
>up a little.  I was smiling when I wrote it so I put a smiley on the post. 

It runs in my mind that Des prefers her criticisms straight, no chaser.
I know I do - one of my ugliest flames was to a person who opened a
piece of mail with "Thank you for telling me that" and closed with
"You guys are so damned arrogant!"  Be consistent.

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
"Shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have all of this,
 and, passionate kisses, passionate kisses, passionate kisses, from you?"
- "Passionate Kisses" Lucinda Williams
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: MWF?
Date: 24 Jan 93 16:15:29 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1993Jan24.155004.4976@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> mel@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu (Meloney D Cregor) writes:

>Now, Rob, I haven't done that in at least a couple days. 'Sides, I have
>3 cats and a dog.  I can get tail anytime I want and Bull has such a nice
>fluffy one.......

Well, I only have two cats, but then again, I get to enjoy the whole
pussy :-)

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
"Shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have this, shouldn't I have all of this,
 and, passionate kisses, passionate kisses, passionate kisses, from you?"
- "Passionate Kisses" Lucinda Williams
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: cs64wag@sdcc8.ucsd.edu (Jeremy Friesner)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.penpals,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat
Subject: Re: SM ISO MAIL
Date: 24 Jan 93 09:09:39 GMT
Followup-To: soc.singles
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <C19GCo.DE7@cen.ex.ac.uk> st92rcn@cen.ex.ac.uk writes:
>My name is rachel and I want your body

Err, there's several thousand of us here; which body in
particular are you wanting?

Jeremy
-- 
|~~~~///~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
|3k!///  "If you never have the time, never get to see cloud 9,   |
\\\///  there's a place where you can wait, on cloud 8."  -FC     |
|\XX/_____________________________________________________________|
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: *How* did you meet your SO (And do they know?)
Date: 21 Jan 1993 08:28:04 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
NNTP-Posting-Host: carina.unm.edu

In article <1993Jan20.192729.4226@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>>All together now:
>>"We met at nine..." "we met at eight..." "I was on time..." "no, you
>>were late..." "Ah yes, I remember it well."
>For the totally clueless out there, this is from _Gigi_.

And for those under 30, "Gigi" was a broadway musical from long back. :)
r.
From: quirke_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Flirting How To Guide posters, readme please!
Date: 22 Jan 93 12:27:09 NZST
Organization: Welligton City Council, Public Access.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
> 01ksdavis@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu (Rebel without a pause.) writes:

> 	   I almost *DIED* laughing at some of the things that were
>    said.  I know you guys are saying to bad I didn't-because I'm not
>    single, and my girlfriend is the best.

> Does anyone have any idea how these illiterates get accounts?

   As I recall, many universitys have some sort of course (usually
nicknamed "Bonehead English") to allow new undergrads to be able to
turn in essays unlikely to cause hysterical laughter in those marking 
them.
   One would assume that it doesn't take in some cases...

(Mind you, here, they only passed out 4 or 5 pages of notes, with what
 and what not to do in writing. The ones most likely to need it were
 the ones least likely to understand it. *sigh* )
-- 
Tony Quirke, Wellington, New Zealand (Quirke_A@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz)
"Only the free have disposition to be truthful.
 Only the truthful have the interest to be just.
 Only the just possess the willpower to be free." - WH Auden.
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: How Does your Name Sound?
Date: 25 Jan 93 15:34:53 GMT
	<1993Jan25.043002.22808@netcom.com>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
NNTP-Posting-Host: grover.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: desiree@netcom.com's message of Mon, 25 Jan 1993 04:30:02 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.043002.22808@netcom.com> desiree@netcom.com (dmc) writes:

   In article <lm6krqINNh1u@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> smith@wesson.Eng.Sun.COM writes:
   >John F sez:

   >>Shit. How are you supposed to make fun of a name like Taylor?   I suppose
   >>I could say that you'll never have a contest for a pronounciation of *your*
   >>last name.
   >>
   >>neener-neener-neener
   >
   >WHAT??? 

	   What part of that don't you understand?

How "taylor" can be pronounced "neener neener neener".

--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Newsgroups: soc.singles