HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cfury@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (Chris Fury)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: ** FINALLY - AN _GREAT_ AMIGA PROGRAMMING LANUAGE
Date: 28 Jan 93 16:51:05 GMT
Organization: Virginia Tech Computer Science Dept, Blacksburg, VA

thecure@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (matthew aardvarkious) writes:

>alien@acheron.amigans.gen.nz (Ross Smith) writes:

>>In article <thecure.727159005@munagin> thecure@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (matthew aardvarkious) writes:
>>>It also caters specifically to common amiga programming, like this.
>>>
>>>w:=OpenW(20,11,400,100,$200,$F,'My first window in E!',NIL,1,NIL)

>>Huh? In what way is this an improvement on the corresponding C code?

>Get it , try it. That example was showing how it caters to "common" amiga
>coding, not the easier nicer E stuff. (With C you declare a pointer to
>the structure, pass the pointer to the function, and then call it. With 
>E , it's all in the one command.)


I can see somebody here hasn't programmed under AmigaDOS 2.0.

Opening a window under 2.0 is simple as:

Window = OpenWindowTags(NULL,
	WA_InnerWidth, 320,   WA_InnerHeight, 200,
	WA_CloseGadget, TRUE, WA_IDCMP, IDCMP_CLOSEWINDOW,
	TAG_DONE);

That little snippet of code will open a 320, 200 window with additional room
for the Title bar and borders and a close gadget, on the default public screen
(workbench, most of the time)

Simple as that!


>>Most (all?) Amiga C compilers now include automatic library opening and
>>closing. And what happens when you need libraries other than those four?


>You can use _anything_ that C compilers use. It does automatic library etc
>and all the includes are included. :)

How so?  I guess these aren't the standard includes, then.  A special version
for E?  And are these the 2.0 includes?  the 3.0 includes?

>--
>If someone cried, you'd sympathise
>It's just a boy or a girl
>It's not the end of the world


Christopher B. Fury        | "...reality was once a primative method of crowd  
cfury@csugrad.cs.vt.edu    |  control that got out of hand" - Jane Wagner
From: paulk@terapin.com (Paul Kienitz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: argonauts
Date: 25 Jan 93 02:12:04 GMT
Organization: BBS

> > Who else here avidly devoured that #1 issue of that exciting
> > developer's magazine, ARGONAUTS?
 
> Where can we get it?
 
  ARGONAUTS
  Box 94
  Pearl River, NY 10965-0094
  USA
 
This first issue has no bylines on the articles, and gives the
impression of having been written all by one person.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: iank@microsoft.com (Ian Kennedy)
Subject: Re: Upgrade MANX C for ADOS 3.0 stuff? How
Date: 25 Jan 93 23:35:34 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation

In article <paulk.3evt@terapin.com> paulk@terapin.com (Paul Kienitz) writes:
>> CBM has been supporting SAS with vast $$$$ and they were going it
>> alone;
> 
>What??  Has C= been giving kickbacks or something??  What's the story
>here?

There is no story. MANX is just pissed that they can't cut the mustard
in the small and hostile Amiga compiler market.

Somebody mail me info on upgrading from MANX to SAS please.
-- 
-------------------------
MAIL : IANK@MICROSOFT.COM
A1200/85MBHD OS3.0 Yeah!
-------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: clldomps@cs.ruu.nl (Louis van Dompselaar)
Subject: Looking for non-corrupt gawk21.lzh
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:23:56 GMT
Organization: Utrecht University, Dept. of Computer Science

I ftp-ed gawk21.lzh from wuarchive.wustl.edu but can't seem to
unarc it with anything (both LhA and LhArc give CRC errors).
Is there anyone who ftp-ed a non-corrupt version from another
site? If so, please let me know so I can follow your example...

Louis
-- 
----Will time run backwards? Is time a spherical object? Is real time-----
----imaginary? Can particles escape from a black hole? Does a finite------
-universe exist without boundaries? Does God adhore a naked singularity?--
-What is the mind of God? Can man picture a universe created without God?-
From: paulk@terapin.com (Paul Kienitz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Manx is ORPHANING Aztec C!
Date: 23 Jan 93 10:08:07 PST
Organization: BBS

I recently asked on the Aztec BBS when work would resume on the Amiga compiler.
 I got this reply from the guy who I believe is the #1 developer:

MESSAGE: 9331                                   DATE/TIME: 01-19-93  2:06pm
FROM   : JEFF DAVIS                             RECEIVED : NO
TO     : PAUL KIENITZ                           PRIVATE  : NO
SUBJECT: anythin happenin?                      THREAD   : YES
FOLDER : D, "Amiga Folder"

Paul,
 I've been told that the Aztec/Amiga product has been frozen at the 
current level; i.e. Manx is not planning on coming out with another 
update of the Amiga compiler.
- Jeff Davis
                   ----------------------------------------

I am currently awaiting a further reply as to whether this means no bugfixes,
or simply no major upgrades.

In either case, the message is clear.  Aztec C for Amiga is now basically an
unsupported product.

I never thought I'd be saying this, but:

     DON'T BUY AZTEC C.

        DO    N O T    BUY AZTEC C!

To put that another way,

Do NOT BUY Aztec C!!!

The "current level" that it is frozen at has at least one serious defect, and
is not entirely usable with 68040s either.  Even if they come out with one last
bugfix, the source level debugger will never get the major update it needs, and
so forth.  Nor will we ever get the stuff they were talking about for version
6, like a GUI front end, __chip and __far features, register tracking
optimization, etc.

Damn it's going to be a bitch to convert all my code to SAS or the commercial
version of DICE ...
From: adrianb@spectrum.adsp.sub.org (Adrian V. Beech)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Macro68
Date: 22 Jan 93 10:21:49 GMT
Organization: Polarware Information Services

jamie@cdevil.unx.sas.com (James Cooper) writes:


>In article <C0MJLo.9Bw@ccu.umanitoba.ca>, umpistun@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Brent Pistun) writes:
>>   Anyone know where I can get the Macro68 assembler?  I saw it on
>>an FTP site about a year ago and now I can't find it..    Please
>>send E-mail if you know where I can find it.  Thanks in advance.

>If you saw it on an FTP site, it was either a demo version (I never heard of 
>one being created) or a pirate copy (much more likely).

>Macro68 is a Commercial product, sold through The Puzzle Factory in Veneta, OR.
>Look in about any recent issue of Amazing Computing for their full page ad.

You could even E-Mail the author on paulc@digisoft.adsp.sub.org.  I'm sure Paul
Coward would like to hear from you!

>Jim Cooper


-- 
O |   Amiga ///       CBMNET: cbmozq.adsp.sub.org!spectrum!adrianb        | O
  |        ///          INET: A.Beech@ext.gu.edu.au                       |
O |    \\\///                                                             | O
  |     \XX/ Unix     Australian Amiga Developer          Adrian V. Beech |
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: mpue2@syma.sussex.ac.uk (James E. Talbut)
Subject: Loading functions from disk
Organization: University of Sussex, five miles away from Brighton
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 15:52:51 GMT

I want to write a program that works in a modular way and loads the
correct module from disk as and when I want it.

Each module will consist of one or more functions for doing a specific task.
What I want to do is load in a file from disk, pointer a pointer to a
function at the memory I loaded it into and call the function.

What is the easiest way of doing this?

I am using DICE and WB2.04, so any solutions will have to use them.

I reckon there should be a fairly simple solution but I can't think of it!

Thanks for any help
	J.T.
	












-- 
Fine beer may be judged with just one sip,
	but it's better to be thoroughly sure.  -  Czech proverb

James Talbut            mpue2@syma.susx.ac.uk
From: vinsci@nic.funet.fi (Leonard Norrgard)
Subject: Re: GDB Port?
Organization: Soft Service, Inc.
	<VINSCI.93Jan19224132@nic.nic.funet.fi>
	<TMANNINE.93Jan20001513@aix370.oulu.fi>
Date: 23 Jan 93 18:46:50

In article <TMANNINE.93Jan20001513@aix370.oulu.fi> tmannine@aix370.oulu.fi (Tero Manninen) writes:
> On 19 Jan 93 22:41:32,
> vinsci@nic.funet.fi (Leonard Norrgard) said:
> 
> Leonard> In article <mbs.1joj@adastra.cvl.va.us> mbs@adastra.cvl.va.us (Michael B. Smith) writes:
> > Because there is no BFD port for the Amiga.
> 
> Leonard> That was once true. ;-) There's a port now, which should have enough
> Leonard> capabilities (it can't write new amiga object files, but it can read,
> Leonard> and that's all the debugger should need).
> 
> Is there a new linker coming?
> I see that there is a newer linker in gnu binutils-2.0 which uses BFD.

Eventually, yes.  My BFD work so far includes only reading of
object-files as needed by GDB.  For BFD to be useful for the linker,
it must be able to write amiga style object files as well.  I will
hopefully find some time to do that part as well within the next six
months (if someone else feels for this and have time, contact me and
I'll help you get started, it should be quite easy and there's example
code around.  You'd likely need access to a unix system though.); the
goal for that project is to finally get chip data attributes into
amiga gcc.

> ++Tero

-- Leonard
From: d2ser@dtek.chalmers.se (Svante Eriksson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Unwanted SAS/C symbol hunks
Date: 26 Jan 93 23:42:59 GMT
Organization: Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg Sweden

rseichter@darkness.gun.de (Ralph Seichter) writes:

>Here are my SCOPTIONS:

Add `STRIPDEBUG' to this file, or use it on the SLink command line, to
suppress =all= debug information.

>	MfG,	Ralph

...ser
--
     ///     Svante Eriksson -- Chalmers University of Technology
    ///    Internet: d2ser@dtek.chalmers.se   FidoNet: 2:203/123.42
\\\/// "I've got a plan so cunning you could put a tail on it and call
 \XX/  it a weasel!" -- Edmund, Duke of Edinburgh, aka the Black Adder
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: ruffalom@cs.uwp.edu (Mike Ruffalo)
Subject: config example
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Parkside
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 01:48:15 GMT


	I have used quite a few good configuration files setups, machii,
sid, a few paragon utils, [insert yours here], and scopts. Where that
configuration options is setup such as this:

-=chop=-
programname=term
optimize
define cookie=2
define ask=please
-=chop=-

	Does anyone have any source for any configuration parsing routines
that run as SMOOTHY as these? If so please mail me 'em. Giga-Thanks in
advance.


-- 
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
			PANIC NOW AVOID THE RUSH!
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: paulg@tplrd.tpl.oz.au (Paul Gittings)
Subject: Re: Trouble with g++
Originator: paulg@sydrd19
Organization: Telectronics Pacing Systems
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 00:27:00 GMT


In article <1993Jan20.142512.27953@edb.tih.no>, torebu@edb.tih.no (Tore Busch) writes:
[stuff deleted]
> What really happened was that amiga-shell didn't like the ++ ending of
> libg++.a. After I renamed it to libgpp.a and changed the gpp.rexx script
> the compilation went on just fine!

The Amiga Shell uses a "+" character at the end of the line as a continuation
character (and strips it off).  Other than changing the name of libg++.a,
as described above, one can also insert a couple of spaces, one in the
gpp.rexx script  (change "lg++" to "lg++ ") and I think in the gcc.rexx
script add a " "  at the end of the line that actually invokes the driver.

Paul
From: jimdawson@cup.portal.com (Jim R Dawson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Looking for requester code
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 02:14:56 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world

Does anyone know of any palette or screen mode requesters that work with
2.04 that I can use with a program I am writing? I would prefer a link
library or source code but a shared library is OK.
From: forgeas@swinjm.adsp.sub.org (Jean-Michel Forgeas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Help Finding Device ID and Volumes
Date: 21 Jan 93 07:41:54 GMT
Reply-To: forgeas@swinjm.adsp.sub.org (Jean-Michel Forgeas)
Organization: The Software Winery
X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00 alpha rel2

In article <C12vDt.InB@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>, N. Baccari writes:

>   ID that is HD0: may have a Volume name of WBENCH:. I can isolate
>   HD0: and I can isolate WBENCH: but how do I match the two together.

Compare their dl_Task field: there are equal for the same volume.
Best regards
    Jean-Michel
--
 Jean-Michel Forgeas      uunet!cbmvax!cbmehq!cbmfra!swinjm!forgeas
 16170 Bordeville                            __
 France                                      \/
From: terje@light.fipnet.fi (Terje Bergstrm)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: ** FINALLY - AN _GREAT_ AMIGA PROGRAMMING LANUAGE
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1993 19:56:15 GMT
 <mgwjs*Ig2@light.fipnet.fi> <1993Jan19.130248.15032@fwi.uva.nl>
Organization: Fipnet - Espoo, Finland
X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00 beta rel2

I wrote:
> AmigaE has a major flaw - it can't compile multible source files into one
> executable, so it can't be used for large programs.

Wouter van Oortmerssen answered:

> Ahem, let me add to that:
> 1. Amiga E compiles sources of 100k with the speed that average
>    C compilers deliver for 10k sources
> 2. v2.2 or higher will enable compiling to modukles.

AmigaE is _very_ fast, that's for sure, but the speed of the compiler
doesn't help maintaining a large single-source program. I have divided my
programs into small source files primarily for clarity, not speed.

E is not a language for me. I have always loved the flexibility of C. E is
much more restricted. I came up with a list of major flaws in E language.
Here are few thoughts (in addition to the single-source-philosophy) I still
remember:

- E is very strict with the case of words. Good bye capitalized global
variables. Makes understanding a program more difficult.

- for-structure is very restricted. The C-style for() is so flexible that
the E-version of FOR seems almost unusable.

- it doesn't give a damn to precedences, but evaluates expressions in
left-to-right order. Only parantheses can change the evaluation order.
Results in a great amout of hiding bugs in programs, because everybody is
used to the normal - standardized - evaluation order.

- one can't put the definitions of a program to a separate header file, but
everything has to be in one module. Makes programs very unreadable. For
example, in LMore, #defines are in "defs.h" and #includes in "include.h"
for clarity.

AmigaE is a good language for small programs, but I wouldn't even think
using it for bigger projects.

--
Terje Bergstrm
terje@light.fipnet.fi
From: bushwick@mind.ORG (Pete Rittwage)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: HostileTakeOver of Amiga OS
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 10:33:08 -0500
Organization: Fortress Development HQ

spc@pineal.math.fau.edu (Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner) writes:

>   I've run the program after I've run a bunch of other programs, and had the
> system crash.  I've run the program, opened up the Workbench to run some
> other stuff (convert GIFS to IFF, etc ...) and have had the system crash.
> 
>   Basically, if I want to use either DP III or IV, I reboot the machine and
> load up that one program.  Is DP III/IV hitting the hardware?  I don't know,
> but I suspect that it may because of the difficulty I've had with it.
> 
>   BTW, my set up is an Amiga 500 with 3M Ram (512K of which is chip), and a
> GVP Series II 50M harddrive, one external 3.5" floppy and a modem.
> 
>   -spc (balls in your court ... )
> 

You obviously do not have enough chip memory to do ANYTHING at the same 
time as DPaint is running.  With 512k, you're lucky to get a decent 
resolution with it, especially with a WB in the background.  And 
converting GIF's too?  Certainly this is the problem.  Go to your dealer 
and get the 1M Agnus, have them install it and activate the extra chip 
mem.  You will be AMAZED how much less your system will crash for the 
mere fee of $40-50.  I had the same problem once upon a time.
 
Pete
From: d1joe@dtek.chalmers.se (Jonas Ekstr|m)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: SAS/C 6.2 Patch Now Available!
Date: 23 Jan 93 15:29:51 GMT
Organization: Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg Sweden

ebers@gfxbase.in-berlin.de (Thorsten Ebers) writes:

>In article <C1A0J0.E7A@unx.sas.com>, James Cooper writes:

>>
>> The 6.2 patch for the SAS/C Development System for the Amiga is now
>> available via anonymous FTP.
>>
>> It was just uploaded to ftp.luth.se, as /pub/aminet/new/sc6_2.lha.
>>

>are You sure ?
>I just looked at it and only found a readme file


Now it can be found in the /pub/aminet/biz/patch directory


>> Jim Cooper
>> (jamie@unx.sas.com)                             bix: jcooper
>>
>> Any opinions expressed herein are mine (Mine, all mine!  Ha, ha, ha!),
>> and not necessarily those of my employer.

>Thorsten
>---
>Thorsten Ebers   e-mail: ebers@gfxbase.in-berlin.de

>Tel.: +49 30 321 3428


Jonas
--
Jonas Ekstr|m           Chalmers University of Technology, Computer Science
d1joe@dtek.chalmers.se
From: fheitkamp@desire.wright.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: GCC error message
Date: 27 Jan 93 11:20:10 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Wright State University

In article <1k3lrsINNdkq@rs2.hrz.th-darmstadt.de>, misar@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Walter Misar) writes:
> In article <1993Jan26.150343.17874@mcs.kent.edu>, sryan@mcs.kent.edu (Stephen Ryan.) writes:

>> I am trying to get gcc233 up and running on my system (2.1 A3000)
>> and am having some trouble.  I am getting an error from ld...
> 
	I have gcc222 with all the patches.  I also have an uninstalled
	gcc233.  Please someone tell me why I would want to install
	the 233 version?  It sounds likes it's buggy.  Is it?

> -- 
> Walter Misar                                | It is impossible to enjoy
> misar@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de        | idling thoroughly unless
>                                             | one has plenty of work to do.
Fred Heitkamp, fheitkamp@desire.wright.edu
From: chrisg@cbmvax.commodore.com (Chris Green)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: HELP: Fast Polygon filling
Date: 21 Jan 93 13:03:54 GMT
Reply-To: chrisg@cbmvax.commodore.com (Chris Green)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA

In article <C15Jr4.6rG@dcs.ed.ac.uk> jaxh@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Jon Hanson) writes:
>Can anyone offer me any advice on how to go about writing a fast polygon filling
>routine in assembler. I'm not looking for listings, just useful and not
>too vague ideas.
>
>One posting I saw mentioned using the blitter in block mode to fill the
>largest possible rectangle within the polygon, then using the CPU to fill the
>remaining portions. But how do you find this block ? The same posting claimed
>that drawing the outline of the polygon and then using blitter in fill mode is
>too slow. Is this true ?
>
>Are you better off using Bresenham`s for line-drawing rather than the blitter ?
>The algorithm I'm using is totally slowed down by having to find the screen edge
>intersection for clipping (if part of the line is off screen). By using 
>Bresenham's I could check for the edge boudary for each pixel - no messy
>mults and divides.
>
>Any email on the topic appreciated...
>
>Cheers,
>   .
>   |on Hanson
> `-' jaxh@dcs.ed.ac.uk

	What's your typical polygon size? The tradeoffs and importnat areas for
optimization are a lot different depending on whether your talking about
a few large polygons or hundreds of small ones.


-- 
*-------------------------------------------*---------------------------*
|Chris Green - Graphics Software Engineer   - chrisg@commodore.COM      f
|                  Commodore-Amiga          - uunet!cbmvax!chrisg       n
|My opinions are my own, and do not         - icantforgettheimpression  o
|necessarily represent those of my employer.- youmadeyouleftaholeinthe  r
|"A screaming comes across the sky..."      - backofmyhead              d
*-------------------------------------------*---------------------------*
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: E language (more please)
From: mneylon@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu (Michael Neylon)
Date: 23 Jan 93 23:43:57 EST

eyvind@Lise.Unit.NO (Eyvind Bernhardsen) writes:
: In article <dej.0059@qpoint.ocunix.on.ca>, dej@qpoint.ocunix.on.ca (David Jones) writes:
:  > In article <1jiqrlINNq4g@aludra.usc.edu> wdao@aludra.usc.edu (Walter Dao) writes:
:  > >1) The compiler is extremely case sensitive. (ex :Proc or proc bomb ! it has
:  > >   to be PROC which is visualy ugly .. so LOUD)
:  > >2) a few more math procedures ? (cos,sin,tan)
:  > 
:  > Although I don't have E yet (I may take a look), I can make a few
:  > observations:
:  > 
:  > 1) C is just as case sensitive.
: 
: Yeah, but in C the keywords are lower-case, and you can have lower-case variables.
: So you can write programs in C without touching shift or caps lock, whereas in E,
: you need ALL CAPS for keywords, variables HAVE to be lowercase (at least the first
: two letters), so you're either holding down shift half the time, or turning caps
: lock on/off all the time...  It gets annoying.

However, the case-sensitivity is included for SPEED.  All the compiler as
to do is to look at the first two letters of any word, and can determine
its function (Library function, varible, or keyword).  I must admit, a 
program that would take 2-3 minutes to compile with sas/c that only takes
10 secs under E is a big difference.

And as to math things, all you need to do is to interface one of the 
math libraries.  Yes, unless you have RKM's and/or AutoDocs, this is
quite difficult, but if you are a serious Amiga programmer, you already have
copies of the above...

-- 
Michael Neylon   aka Masem the Great and Almighty Thermodynamics GOD!
      //         | Senior, Chemical Engineering, Univ. of Toledo
  \\ // Only the |   Summer Intern, NASA Lewis Research Center
\  \X/   AMIGA!  |         mneylon@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu           /
From: Jesse_Michael@matrix.rain.com (Jesse Michael)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Going to the metal
Date: 27 Jan 93 01:45:48 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Matrix BBS

In a message dated Tue 26 Jan 93  5:39, Mctaylor@mta.ca ("michael C. Taylor
wrote:

>  Well I just read a review of Wing Commander (Amiga version ) and it
seems
>nice enough on a stock amiga. Works, it is preferible to have a 14MHZ
68000,
>but then again, if you were running MS-DOS you would need at least 12MHZ
286
>and that feels sluggish.

That's not surprising when you know that a 7.14Mhz 68000 has just about the
same processing power as a 10Mhz 80286.

>So buy an A1200...Then tell me that $1ff680 or
>whatever that super-easy to remember address was still works. 
>(Forgot to write it on the back of my hand, is that what you do?)

$dff180 (color 0) works just fine on a A1200.

$dff09a is INTENA.
$dff01e is INTENAR.
$dff096 is DMACON.
$dff002 is DMACONR.
$dff1dc is BEAMCON0.
$dff040 is BLTCON0.
     .....

You can either memorize the ones you need (not very difficult), or just use
the offsets in the include files (which I do anyway).

>It uses enough of the OS to
>be hard drive installable, works on 68030 and maybe the A4000, the review
>posted to c.s.a.reviews didn't test it on one. Too bad the sticker didn't
say
>on the cover. 

And it only uses 16 colors.  It's not a very good copy of the clone
version.

It also isn't any big deal to write "hardware-bashing" code that works on a
68030 or an A4000.

-- Via DLG Pro v0.995

--
Haze of Epsilon / Check out Epsilon for the best in NTSC demos!  Ok, so if
you compare us to groups like Anarchy and Silents then we're lame, but what
the hell do you expect from us lazy Americans?!?  :^)