HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: srt@aero.org (Scott Turner)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: UCLA/Arizona
Date: 8 Jan 93 19:11:37 GMT
Organization: The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: sun-dimas.aero.org
Keywords: Quick summary

reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher) writes:
>I can't count how often Stoudamire blew past Edney down the center of the
>lane, drew two defenders to him, and fed the ball to an open Wildcat 
>(generally Mills) close to the basket for the easy shot.

Someone needs to tell Harrick that the guards are supposed to pinch
off the center of the lane in the 2-3 zone.  UCLA went to the 2-3 to
protect Petruska and the next 4 trips down the court Stoudamire drove
the center of the lane for easy buckets.  Harrick did nothing, very
frustrating. 

>Petruska's poor play, especially rebounding and defense, were the key
>to the game, I thought...  While Zimmerman may have blown the rebound
>at the end, he generally played better defense than Petruska.

On the other hand, Petruska is at least a threat to score at the
offensive end.  The problem against Arizona is that if you play
Zimmerman, Stokes just stands in the lane on defense and gets a
million rebounds and blocks.  At least Petruska was able to draw
fouls.

(It was an unusual game in that Arizona untypically committed a lot of
fouls.)

The frustrating thing for me about this game was watching O'Bannon and
Petruska unsuccessfully try to front the Arizona big men.  Arizona got
a number of easy baskets by lobbing over the defense.  O'Bannon needs
to get more physical so that he can play defense behind opposing big
men without letting them set up on the box.  This playing in front of
post players is ludicrous.

						-- Scott T.
From: melkote@nap.amoco.com (Rajesh R. Melkote - Octane Processing)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: UM-Purdue TV?
Date: 7 Jan 93 14:47:22 GMT
Reply-To: melkote@nap.amoco.com
Distribution: usa
Organization: Amoco

Re: Michigan-Purdue and other non-televised PU ballgames...for those of
us in the Chicago area, I learned that the local Purdue Alum chapter is
setting up satelite telecasts of most if not all of the Purdue hoops
games at GameKeepers (Lincoln and Armitage in Chicago, 312-549-5613).
Also, the alum chapter is having a pre-game dinner reception ($25) at
Northwestern, Jan 28, at 5:30.  If interested call Pat Burk,
312-507-5613 or John DiLuia, 708-986-2365.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
From: wcd2z@curry.edschool.Virginia.EDU (William Camden Daniel)
Subject: Virginia under, FSU over.
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 17:11:56 GMT

Rated that is.  After last night's victory over Florida State,
I really can't believe that these guys started the season in
the top 10.  I think that Virginia belongs in the top 25, but
nothing better than #20.  Right now, I don't think FSU should
be in the top 25 at all until they prove themselves.  Many
people have told me that FSU was ranked high because of how
they were expected to do when Charlie Ward arrived.  Well guess
what?  He was there last night.  I just don't buy it.  As far
as I am concerned a team has to win to earn their ranking, and
thus FSU should be gone from the top 25 until they perform on
that expected level.  Jeez they sound just like Notre Dame in
football, when they are ranked for that reason. :)  I had to
slip that in.

Bill
From: gt6390a@prism.gatech.EDU (BERNSTEIN,AVRON P)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: when Tech last beat Duke in reg season
Date: 7 Jan 93 22:36:26 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


I believe that the last regular season over Duke by Tech would have been
in the 1988-89 season.  Tech beat Duke at Alexander in Danny Ferry's senior 
year.  Since then, sadly, Hurley and co. have won all the games vs Tech, save
the one in the ACC tournament in 1990.  Not all of them have been runaways
mind you, but Duke has still won them all.  I think that at least half of the
Duke wins since then have been by 6 points or less, but I'm not positive.
-- 
BERNSTEIN,AVRON P
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt6390a
Internet: gt6390a@prism.gatech.edu
From: rjm1@acpub.duke.edu (ROBERT MACKENNA)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: Ga. Tech
Date: 11 Jan 93 20:28:44 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

In article <ASH.93Jan11124626@ulysses.mr.ams.com> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:
>I guess I was wrong.  Way to go, Yellowjackets!  Up next, North
>Carolina.  Can they do it again??

Only if they're just as psyched up to play Carolina as they were to play
Duke.  I'm guessing we'll see a massive letdown by the Jackets and
Carolina cruises by at least 15.

Although I am looking forward to the collision between the massive front
lines of Tech and Carolina.  I eagerly await Carolina @ Tech, which I
think will be a much better game.

At least Tech won't be on the road versus a hostile crowd! :-)

- Rob Mac K


-- 
*ROB Mac K - The Man, The Myth, The Legend.  As if. ***********************
*        [}uke             1991 National Champions      "Wekickus         *
*          Blue Devils:    1992 National Champions           Sumassus"    *
****************************************************** rjm1@acpub.duke.edu*
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
From: kbowers@esrc1.uucp (Ken Bowers)
Subject: Re: Cal Woes (long)
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 23:02:37 GMT

In article <1993Jan11.204732.8775@odin.corp.sgi.com> kubey@sgi.com (Ken Kubey) writes:
>In article <XJAM.93Jan9004438@cork.CS.Berkeley.EDU> xjam@cork.CS.Berkeley.EDU (The Crossjammer) writes:
>>
>>>>>>> On 5 Jan 93 22:17:54 GMT, kubey@sgi.com (Ken Kubey) said:
>>
>>  Ken> Also, the two losses were in New Jersey.  Cal's first 5 games were all
>>  Ken> in the SF Bay Area with a lot of Cal fans at each game.  I watched the
>>  Ken> game against JMU and there was no energy at all in the building.
>>  Ken> I think Cal would have played better with a loud home crowd rooting
>>  Ken> against them.
>>
>
>In the next article:
>>Well Ken thanks for explaining how in the world Cal could lose to two poor
>>excuses for Division I programs. (JMU has subsequently lost to American
>>University and Cornell is Ivy League for goodness sake). I've been on
>>vacation so I can't do my typical ranting about how Campanelli can't coach
>>but I have two words that typify my feelings on his style:
>>
>>Billy Dreher
>
>And what was wrong with Billy Dreher?  
>Who would you have put out there instead of him?

I'm the Ken who Crossjammer was responding to in that article. 
One of the big knocks on Campanelli is that players burn out playing
for him, playing worse at the end of their careers than the beginning.
Dreher is a prime example; two years ago, as a Sophmore transfer,
he lead the Pac-10 by hitting 47% of his three-point shots and 
showed good ball-handling skills.  Last year he lost his shooting
touch at the beginning of the year, became tentative, and ended up
getting little playing time on a struggling team.  This year he 
didn't even come out for the team, saying he felt very little
support from the coaching staff.  The question is why he isn't
out there this year, providing some senior leadership and outside
shooting. 

Ken "The Ken in Cliff's Pac-10 Updates" B. 

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,psu.sports
From: wmaley@alchemy.uhl.uiowa.edu (Walt Maley)
Subject: Re: Lady Lions soar to 9-0 and No. 6 overall!!!
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:16:43 GMT
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

When do they come to Iowa City?

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Walt Maley    | 'God, what a mess, on the ladder of success.  Where you take
Chemist II    |  one step and miss the whole first rung.'  Paul Westerberg
wmaley@alchemy|  
uhl.uiowa.edu|       *Setters do it with their hands*  ;-)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: rsk@gynko.circ.upenn.edu (Rich Kulawiec)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: The (updated) Saga of Bobby Knight: A Year-by-Year Chronology
Date: 10 Jan 93 13:33:21 GMT
Organization: Ditka Policy Institute

In article <1993Jan10.010320.15981@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>
>I'm not going to defend Knight (I'll leave that to the IU gang), but I find
>it strangely ironic that a post like this came out of Pennsylvannia moments
>after IU kicked Penn State's ass in basketball.  I guess we are going to
>see new heights in being poor losers with Penn State's admission to the Big
>10.

I had no idea that they were even playing; and I'm not a particular fan
of any school in Pennsylvania.  (I *am* a fan of Purdue, Bradley and
Colorado, among other schools.  I'm also a fan of Joe Paterno's, but
don't even know who coaches PSU's hoops team.)

>You pose a pretty bad argument for somebody
>from such a highly-regarded academic institution such as Penn.

I'm not from Penn; and you picked apart one paragraph in a long posting
on the basis of (alleged) factual errors.  If the facts are wrong, I'll
correct them.  But the article doesn't contain any "argument" in
particular; it just recites history.

It would have better for you to ask ("Did you post this because you
were pissed about the IU/PSU game?" and "Are you a Penn grad?") rather
than assuming connections that don't in fact exist.  Heck, I would
have sent this out a month ago, but I've been kinda busy.

---Rsk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
From: saji@thor.ece.uc.edu (Sandeep  Aji)
Subject: Re: UC beats UMASS
Keywords: UC, Bearcats, UMass
Organization: University of Cincinnati
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 15:20:25 GMT

In article <1993Jan12.132721.2279@cis.ohio-state.edu>, atchison@lyre.cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark Atchison) writes:
|> 
|> And for the record, with the exception of Nick Van Solo's three pointers in the
|> first half, it the worst half of Division I hoops I've ever watched in my life.
|> Sheesh!  Proved what?  Neither team ran a shred of any offense, and U Mass 
|> (exclamation marks mercifully omitted) looked positively awful.  What was the
|> score at the 5 minute mark, about 15-11?  Come on, now.  I'm *not* saying that
|> the Bearcats aren't a Top 25 (or even Top 10) team, but *that* game did 
|> absolutely nothing to prove it.

   Well that's the way the Bearcats play their games. One has to get used to it. 
   Hardnosed defense is what helps them. Opposing teams end up taking a lot of 
   poor shots and missing. Do not expect to see UNLV style or Big-8 style 
   offense here. Temple, which was averaging 88+ pts per game when it came
   into Cincinnati was shut down to < 50 pts. The games might not look very 
   pretty, but I would rather take a "W" against a top-25 team than look good
   on TV.

   Aji

|> _______________________________________________________________________________
|>  Mark Atchison, a.k.a. <atchison@cis.ohio-state.edu>; Graduate Student in the

-- 
  | 	Sandeep A. Aji			| saji@thor.ece.uc.edu      |
  |     University of Cincinnati   	| saji@hagar.ece.uc.edu     |
  |        FINAL FOUR 1992              | 	                    |
  |                                     | 			    |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
From: kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado)
Subject: Re: Virginia under, FSU over.
Organization: Florida State University Department of Know-it-alls
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 93 16:30:00 GMT

In article <SINGH.93Jan8001313@julius.cs.uiuc.edu> singh@julius.cs.uiuc.edu (Rajendra Singh) writes:
>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Jan 93 21:38:23 GMT, kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado) said:
>> them down as well.). About Ward, remember, this was his first game back with
>> the team (only days after the Orange bowl) and he simply is NOT in sinc with
>> the team yet (or in shape for that matter).
>
>It would seem quite likely that he wouldn't be in sync yet, but what do
>you meen by not in shape?  I've heard at least one other person say
>that, but I would think he would still be in good shape from the
>football season.  Is the conditioning that different?

Well actually, yes it is. Remember, in football you have a lot of "down" time
when you are not doing any sort of running. In basketball, the action is 
almost constant (except at the end of close games...all those damn time-outs
and foul shots...ugh) and that action is running. Ward is in good shape, but
he isn't quite in basketball shape yet (though he will probly get there 
quickly). Also, he still hasn't had a lot of time to practice with the team
and get back into the basketball rythm...he has to relearn everything.

>
>peace,
> -raj
>--
>			  __ \_;
>****- OM -****		 (  \
>Rajendra Singh		    |
>singh@cs.uiuc.edu	   /__/--\
>			   \   @_/
>			    |
>			^.  /
>			 `==
>


Kevin
From: crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: Picks and Screens, please???? Re: Biased Fans
Date: 7 Jan 1993 20:51:42 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
NNTP-Posting-Host: stein.u.washington.edu

scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis) writes:
>
>In article <1ifqk6INNqm0@shelley.u.washington.edu>, crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck) writes:
>>There are two common varieties of illegal screens that I can think of.
>....
>>the step-screen, where a defender "sets" a screen, and then tries to make
>>the screenee take even more steps by taking small steps to force an even
>>longer route around the screen. 
>
>Also, the back-screen, where the screener sets-up right behind
>the player.  Is this illegal or has this been changed again?

D*mn, I knew I'd forget something.  The back screen is legal, although
there is one other rule regarding them--the screener can't just run up and
plow a screen right at the back of a defender.  You have to allow one step
for the defender to get by.  In practice, one step is about 1 foot for a
guard and about 18" for a big man.

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   There is no such thing as "rock bottom".
University of Washington      *   
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
From: fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: Kentucky over Indiana
Date: 5 Jan 93 17:49:35 GMT
Organization: Austerlitz, Gershovitz, and Carmichael

Craig Simpson writes:

>I seems like the only half court offense that UK has is the three or
>one-on-one moves by Mashburn and Rhodes (and maybe Ford).  Packer seems
>to think that they will get better as the year progresses but I'm not
>sure.  Ever sense Patino has been coach at UK thats all I've seen from 
>them.  Is this the case?  Would some UK fan let me know if I'm wrong
>one this?

This is currently the case. But [Peter Sellers in seedy Victorian
flat surrounded by hundreds of cats, beakers, a trephane, a skeleton
or two] UK was not always as you see it now. [Sellers picks up stray
kitten to blot undated death certificate.] Last year's half court offense was 
fabruous, simply fabruous. [Name that movie and win a pony] UK scored
most of its points on lay ups coming off the offense.

Whether UK progresses depends upon a lot of things. A couple of
real stinko losses to drop them out of the Top 10 might help. Brassow
and Martinez playing at full throttle won't hurt. Delk able to spell
Ford would be a plum.
sc
-- 
Jeff Davis <davis@keats.ca.uky.edu> One never knows, do one?
From: rich@psipost.UUCP (Rich Main)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: Duke-Tech game
Date: 7 Jan 93 13:45:41 GMT
Organization: Post Software International, Wake Forest, NC

In article <79317@hydra.gatech.EDU>, gt6390a@prism.gatech.EDU (BERNSTEIN,AVRON P) writes:
> 
> Any brave souls out there willing to predict that Tech will upset Dook on
> Sunday?  Just interested is all.  I just stood in line to get my student 

I don't think that it would be that much of an upset.  Duke usually has
a tough time at Tech.  Assuming the usual steady play by Hurley and the
Hills, the key would seem to be Parks' play inside.
From: krall@Think.COM (Tom Krall)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: CNN/USA Today Rankings (1/11)
Date: 11 Jan 1993 18:25:31 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: custard.think.com
Keywords: rankings

In article <C0oznt.768@babbage.ece.uc.edu>, saji@snert.ece.uc.edu (Sandeep  Aji) writes:
|> 
|>  I don't know if anybody posts these rankings on a regular basis. As it is
|>  Monday morning and as the Bearcats have moved up in the rankings I am 
|>  posting the current Top-25 rankings.
|> 
|> 
|> 	USA TODAY /  CNN   TOP - 25  (Coaches Poll) (1/11/93)
|> 	-----------------------------------------------------
|> 
|> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|>        RANK	SCHOOL		RCD	POINTS		PRV
|> 							RANK
|> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|> 	1.  	Kentucky	11-0	832(26)		(2)
|> 	2.	Duke		10-1	798(5)		(1)
|> *	3.	Michigan	12-1	787(2)		(3)
|> *	4.	Indiana		13-2	720		(4)
|> 	5.	Kansas		11-1	719(1)		(6)
|> 	6.	North Carolina	12-1	689		(5)
|> 	7.	Seton Hall	13-1	640		(7)
|> 	8.	Georgia Tech.	9-1	606		(11)
|> 	9.	Oklahoma	11-2	535		(10)
|> 	10.	Arkansas	11-1	512		(13)
|> 	11.	CINCINNATI	9-1	441		(16)
|> 	12.	Arizona		7-2	404		(17)
|> *	13.	Iowa		11-2	397		(8)
|> 	14.	UCLA		10-3	373		(12)
|> *	15.	Purdue		9-2	335		(9)
|> 	16.	Connecticut	7-2	299		(19)
|> 	17.	UNLV		6-1	272		(14)
|> 	18.	Virginia	9-0	222		(--)
|> *	19.	Michigan State	8-3	185		(15)
|> 	20.	Georgetown	8-2	157		(18)
|> 	21.	Florida State	9-5	120		(23)
|> *	22.	Ohio State	9-2	97		(--)
|> 	23.	Vanderbilt	11-3	96		(20)
|> *	24.	Minnesota	10-1	92		(--)
|> 	25.	Nebraska	11-3	83		(22)
|> 

Wow, 7 B10 schools in the top25 !!!!
Are the B10 schools really this good ?
Being a *major* Gopher fan, I am thrilled they are doing so well.
Are they for real ? I didn't expected them to be very good this year.

Go Gophs !!!!!
-Tom
|> 
|> 
|>   Aji
|> 
|> 
|>   GO BEARCATS !!!!!!!!
|> 
|> -- 
|>   | 	Sandeep A. Aji			| saji@thor.ece.uc.edu      |
|>   |     University of Cincinnati   	| saji@hagar.ece.uc.edu     |
|>   |        FINAL FOUR 1992              | 	                    |
|>   |                                     | 			    |

-- 
=============================
Thomas F. Krall 
Product Support
Thinking Machines Corporation
=============================
From: landay+@cs.cmu.edu (James A Landay)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: Cal Woes (long)
Date: 12 Jan 93 17:57:50 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.C0r5wG.BE.2
Distribution: na
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon

In article <1993Jan12.015944.21212@odin.corp.sgi.com> kubey@sgi.com (Ken Kubey) writes:
>In article <1993Jan11.230237.29878@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> kbowers@esrc1.uucp (Ken Bowers) writes:
>>One of the big knocks on Campanelli is that players burn out playing
>>for him, playing worse at the end of their careers than the beginning.
>>Dreher is a prime example; two years ago, as a Sophmore transfer,
>>he lead the Pac-10 by hitting 47% of his three-point shots and 
>>showed good ball-handling skills.  Last year he lost his shooting
>>touch at the beginning of the year, became tentative, and ended up
>>getting little playing time on a struggling team.  This year he 
>>didn't even come out for the team, saying he felt very little
>>support from the coaching staff.  The question is why he isn't
>>out there this year, providing some senior leadership and outside
>>shooting. 
>
>I see.  He contracted "Ryan Drew's" disease.
>Ryan was a terrific 3-pt shooter in is first year at Cal.
>The next 3 years, he would come out at miss 5 of his first 6 shots
>and Campanelli would *then* pull him out of the game.

Actually, I would refer to it as Bryant Walton Disease (or even
Chris Washington Disease.)  It has happened to EVERY shooting-guard
since Lou has been coach.  He seems to be able to recruit (why,
I don't know), but he is NOT a very good coach.  This has happened
too often.  In addition, how many games have they blown over his
tenure by not being able to make the inbound pass (see at Arizona about
4 years ago...)  

>
>Dreher's fall-off wasn't as bad as Drew's.  I don't know the whole
>story, but I bet that Billy Dreher quit because he knew he would
>be riding the bench behind Kidd, Haase, and Roberts.
>I don't blame the coach when players lose their shooting ability.

I do.  They lose their confidence, NOT ability.
Better hope it is not happening to Haase now...

Lou Campanelli even held Kevin Johnson back...


-- 

James A. Landay
landay@cs.cmu.edu
From: jwest@andersen.uucp (Jeffrey A. West)
Subject: Re: The (updated) Saga of Bobby Knight: A Year-by-Year Chronology
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 20:21:51 GMT

>Dominos and ordered 50 large pizza's to be delivered to those in line.  I also

Actually it was Pizza Express

>remember that Bobby often donates his entire earnings from his contract with
>Adidas to the IU library fund.  
>
>        Please update your list with these stories.
>
>Mr. Kelly Dougan


I hate to be picky but for someone who spent the night sleeping against
the door of Assembly Hall it was memberable!!!

Thanks Bobby!!!

Jw
-- 
     ===== ====  ====  ====                         
      //   \\   \\    \\     jwest@andersen.com or  
 \\  //   //   //=   //=       jwest@andersen.uucp  
   ==    ==== //    //
From: sushi@mcl.ucsb.edu (Christine Stellina)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: UCSB (Big West) What's the story?
Date: 12 Jan 93 19:43:34 GMT

I'm missing all the Big West action (is there any) since graduation.  Cna anyone fill me in on what is happing at UCSB?  How are the new frosh.  WHO are the new frosh.?

Thanks
From: metzler@pablo.physics.lsa.umich.edu (Chris Metzler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: Duke/Oklahoma
Date: 6 Jan 1993 06:30:09 GMT
Organization: University of Michigan Department of Physics
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: pablo.physics.lsa.umich.edu

In article <1ibfqpINNhcu@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, as232@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Lerner) writes:
|> 
|> In fact, I think it is only just that UK and Duke are the top rated teams
|> now; only UK really gave Duke a run for their championship last year . . .
|> 

Unfortunately, you're correct.  But a year ago December, early in the
season, the regular-season game in Ann Arbor between Michigan and Duke
was one of the best basketball games I've ever seen.  And that was when
Webber, Rose, et al had about a week of college basketball experience.

It's early yet.  It may be that UM's attitude kills them.  When they're
in the wrong frame of mind (which happens way too often), they'd have
trouble beating their mothers.  But when they're in the right frame
of mind, they can hang with anyone.  Yes, even Duke.

-- 
SNAILMAIL:                                       AT&TMAIL:
Chris Metzler                                    313-764-4607 (office)
Department of Physics, University of Michigan    313-996-9249 (home)
Randall Lab, 500 E. University
Ann Arbor, MI  48109-1120 USA

E-MAIL:  metzler@pablo.physics.lsa.umich.edu
From: fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Re: Trash talking %^$#@*)(
Date: 7 Jan 93 18:48:18 GMT
Organization: Austerlitz, Gershovitz, and Carmichael

Wes Morgan writes:
>
>Obligatory basketball comment: After winning the King of the Bluegrass
>tournament, Lexington's Paul Lawrence Dunbar High School was upset in 
>the finals of the Ashland Invitational.

I have a dream. It's a small one, but one which helps fill those
white nights of insomnia. I imagine an all-Dunbar tournament to
be hosted here in Lexington -- Dunbar high schools from all over the 
country. One by one, the buses filled w/ teams and fans pull in
to Lexington Dunbar's parking lot...Well, you'd have to have been
there.
-- 
Jeff Davis <davis@keats.ca.uky.edu>