HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rittle@supra.comm.mot.com (Loren James Rittle)
Subject: Re: Three AGA questions.
Organization: Land Mobile Products Sector, Motorola Inc.
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:33:50 GMT
Keywords: n

In article <1992Nov10.214406.11978@kth.se> nv89-pla@hemul.nada.kth.se (Peter Laan) writes:
>With HAM8 you could get 16M colors if you had enough pixels. Just choose
>the correct 64 base colors.

Yes, this is true and last weekend I wrote the test program that
proves it... :-)  Thanks to Chris Green for posting the needed
info on the new function call that allows one to set color table
entries with 96 bits (WOW! Some people at C= are thinking ahead
a few years... :-) of precision.

Once I add the feature that allows the user to pick a display mode
to view the test in via a GUI, I'll release the code as PD.

Now, if I could just get ahold of info on the OS 3.0 driven
double-buffering I'd be real happy.

Loren
--
Loren J. Rittle (rittle@comm.mot.com)
Systems Technology Research (IL02/2240)
Motorola, Inc.
(708)576-7794
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: mjl@newton.auto.tuwien.ac.at (Martin J. Laubach)
Subject: Re: Networking?  WHY?!?
Organization: University of technology, Vienna, Austria. 
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 11:58:07 GMT

|> fast networking scheme on _all_ Amigas

  What *I* would like to see is a low-end Amiga booting off the net...

	mjl

Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
From: bevis@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Jeff Bevis)
Subject: Re: PC, Redneck President, and other bad news. (was Re: Amiga 1200)
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 02:57:20 GMT

In article <1dapidINN6lc@agate.berkeley.edu> kevinm@ocf.berkeley.edu (Kevin Miller) writes:
>In article <1d9i8gINN9i7@mozz.unh.edu> ggg@kepler.unh.edu (Gregory G Greene) writes:
>>	I'm preparing myself for 2 things, TAX and SPEND.  I figure it won't
>
>TAX and SPEND is infinitely better than the TAX and BORROW that we had 
>under Reagan and Bush.  Keep in mind that our Federal Deficit every year is
>nearly equal to the intrest that we have to pay on the debt.  Maybe you should
>blame the administration that brought about the debt and not the one that's
>going to take the responsibility to do something about it.

I can't wait to see the defecit/debt figures in four years... Omigosh. :-)
Do you really believe it's going to go down?  With the Democrats now 
dominating not only the house and senate, but also the executive branch?
You're going to be very disappointed.  Just wait.


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Oh, my beloved ice cream bar!  How I love to lick your creamy center -- and
your oh-so-nutty chocolate covering.  You're not like the others -- you like
the same things I do! Wax paper... boiled football leather... dog breath!" -Ren
From: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: AGA monitors.
Date: 6 Nov 92 04:55:47 GMT
Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA

In article <Bx962E.633@news.cs.andrews.edu> adap@edmund.cs.andrews.edu (Edsel Adap) writes:
> In article <Bx6r8q.FBz@cck.coventry.ac.uk> csg019@cck.coventry.ac.uk (-~=Zaphod=~-) writes:
> >If i bought and A1200, what monitor would i require to take advantage of the
> >new display modes? Could i use an SVGA monitor? Or would i have to bug one of
> >those really expensive multisync ones?
> >
> 
> You need one of those Multisync monitors to take advantage of the new
> AGA modes.  However, not just any multisync. From what I've read, you
> need one that does 15Khz - 72 Khz monitors.

Gah!  Horizontal 15-31.5 KHz, Vertical 50-72 Hz, w/interlace.

The 15-72KHz range you suggest will really put you in a "doesn't exist"
category or at least blow your budget.

>                                               My suggestion is the C=
> 1960 Monitor.  You're going to have a hard time finding a third party
> monitor that supports those scanning rates.

They're the traditional "Multi-sync" scan rates, or at least the second
generation (older ones didn't always support 72 Hz).

-- 
George Robbins - now working for,     work:   to be avoided at all costs...
but no way officially representing:   uucp:   {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
Commodore, Engineering Department     domain: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com
From: masc@sbustd.rz.uni-sb.de (Martin Schulze)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: A1200 AIBB_5.0 BenchMark Tests
Date: 13 Nov 92 14:10:12 GMT
Organization: Studenten-Mail, Rechenzentrum Universitaet des Saarlandes

beesonm@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Mark R Beeson ) writes:
> Okay.. we've got the Amiga 500, 600, 1000, 1200, 2000, 2500, 3000,
> and 4000.
> 
> Where's the 300?  Where's the 2400?  Where's the 9600?
> 
> I WANT THE AMIGA 14.4k, CBM!  Develop it before I go crazy!

In the UK there's an Amiga 1500 availible!
(It's an A2000 with 2nd internal diskdrive :)
 
> Mark Beeson

--
Martin Schulze at "Universitaet des Saarlandes"
masc@stud.uni-sb.de
From: leekil@bbn.com (Lee Kilpatrick)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Amiga 600 PCMCIA
Date: 7 Nov 92 22:34:27 GMT
Reply-To: leekil@BBN.COM (Lee Kilpatrick)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com


With the PCMCIA expansion port on the Amiga 600, I assume it is
possible to put ROM memory here to use the port for game cartridges?
Someone in a recent AmigaWorld mentioned that how the 600 might draw
kids away from Nintendos, and if it had the ability to use cartridges,
that would help.  Would PCMCIA be too expensive to use for cartridges?

	Lee
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Hardware Reference Manual
From: lkoop@TIGGER.STCLOUD.MSUS.EDU (LaMonte Koop)
Date: 6 Nov 92 21:52:19 -0600
Reply-To: lkoop@TIGGER.STCLOUD.MSUS.EDU
Organization: SCS GP/Engineering Cluster

In article <92311.173334K3023E2@ALIJKU11.BITNET>, <K3023E2@ALIJKU11.BITNET> writes:
>Hello Folks|
>....
>Is it true that the descriptions for the AGA Custom Chips will *not*
>be released?
>Well, I hardly believe that. I mean that makes no sense to me|
>The Amiga comes into real life just with the Hardware References and I am
>not really looking forward to spend whole nights disassembling and testing
>just to come up to informations I might easlily find in nice and relaxed
>(book) format instead of ugly and though (assembly) format.
>(Reminds me of good old C64 days...)

    You are missing the point behind the reasoning for not releasing the
information in such a 'relaxed' form.  The graphics hardware is changing.
C= is trying to move to a more device-independent and retargetable graphics
form for the Amiga.  Direct hardware banging inhibits this when it is
sanctioned.  For this reason, by not releasing the AGA register setup and
hardware programming methods, C= is allowing the hardware to change by
placing an insulating layer above the hardware itself.
    Note though that if you DO 'disassemble and test' as you mentioned in
order to directly manipulate the AGA set, it is almost guaranteed your code
WILL break in the possibly near future on other machines.  This is exactly
why C= does not wish to release the information in book form.  By doing so,
C= would liable itself to support direct hardware manipulation...and in
doing so would prohibit smooth transitions to more advanced graphics hardware.
Yes, such a reference manual could come with the warning that 'this will not
work on future machines'...but the essence is that the Amiga does not need
a base of software guaranteed to break on the next chip revision, machine
architecture, etc...

                 ----------------------------------------
           LaMonte Koop -- SCSU Electrical/Computer Engineering
 Internet: lkoop@tigger.stcloud.msus.edu -OR- f00012@kanga.stcloud.msus.edu
              "You mean you want MORE lights on this thing???"
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: jpbaker@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Jon P Baker)
Subject: Re: Amiga and 64sx hack
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 20:07:10 GMT

A better solution with a more readable monitor would be to use a PC
"Transportable" case. They are availible mail order with 9" VGA
monitors that should work with the Amiga. This would provide a much
better picture as well as being quite readable. The system should come
with keyboard, so using the IBM Keyboard hack would be useful. The
transportable style case usually has room for 3-5 half-height devices.

Jon

-- 
  Jon Paul Baker, Chaos Foundation  jpbaker@silver.ucs.indiana.edu 
       Computer Science Major, Indiana University Bloomington  
                         ----====><====----
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: dmacphee@nyx.cs.du.edu (Don mac phee)
Subject: Re: Hardware Reference Manual?
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 23:19:25 GMT

><K3023E2@ALIJKU11.BITNET> writes:
>>Dear People,

>>I wondered if someone knows when the new (AGA) Hardware Reference Manual
>>will be published or if it's already been released.

>>I'm really looking forward to have a look at it|||

 Okay... but now comes the TOUGH question... When will we see the
release of the REST of the manuals? (Libraries, Devices, Includes and
AutoDocs?)

 I personally want to start programming on this machine, but I want to make
sure my code is 3.0 compliant.

--
Amiga /s/   Donald Mac Phee  \\\ agimA  Should the message regarding whether
2000 /s/ Rpg110@Uriacc.Bitnet \\\ 0002 or not you want to post your rantings
 \Perot dmacphee@Nyx.Cs.Du.Edu \\\///  come AFTER you've written your flame?
  \XR/ Personal_09@Ecl1.Uri.Edu \XX/   1 in 5 for Perot. Says something?
From: peterk@cbmger.de.so.commodore.com (Dr Peter Kittel Germany)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: amiga 1200 specs - fr
Date: 5 Nov 92 16:02:48 GMT
Reply-To: peterk@cbmger.de.so.commodore.com (Dr Peter Kittel Germany)
Distribution: comp
Organization: Commodore Germany

In article <1992Nov4.4509.23922@dosgate> "roger bouchard" <roger.bouchard@canrem.com> writes:
>to Dave Williams
>
>DW>   You guys have missed the obvious - How about a A1000-style case!
>DW>
>funny you should say that as I recently mused with just such an idea . it
>would be possible to make a case with a 2 may be 3 card expansion using a
>case like the 1000 , same size . 

Reality check please!!! Take a look at an A4000: Ok, it has four slots.
Making this two, it could get a little less case height, but the you get
difficulties with the power supply. In other words: With this sort of
expansion, a case of A4000 size *is* *full*! I don't see a chance how to
fit all this stuff in a case like the A1000, which is ca. half of that
height.

-- 
Best regards, Dr. Peter Kittel  // E-Mail to \\  Only my personal opinions...
Commodore Frankfurt, Germany  \X/ {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!cbmger!peterk
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Moving 500 to 1200, BAD NEWS
From: lkoop@TIGGER.STCLOUD.MSUS.EDU (LaMonte Koop)
Date: 10 Nov 92 01:17:15 -0600
Reply-To: lkoop@TIGGER.STCLOUD.MSUS.EDU
 <OD.6badnetOA92-901-302p0_52d49fb1@piraya.bad.se><1davn7INNfhf@cs.tut.fi>,<H0mXr*h41@dynam.adsp.sub.org>
Organization: SCS GP/Engineering Cluster

In article <H0mXr*h41@dynam.adsp.sub.org>, jmpor@dynam.adsp.sub.org (Jean-Marc Porchet) writes:
>In article <1davn7INNfhf@cs.tut.fi>, Kolkka Markku Olavi writes:
>
>> In article <OD.6badnetOA92-901-302p0_52d49fb1@piraya.bad.se> Roger_Nordin@atb.bbs.bad.se (Roger Nordin) writes:
>> >
>> >Parity checking is a thing from the pre-historic when DRAMs were unreliable. 
>> >Just like MS-DOG (yes, both pre-historic and unreliable :)).
>
>Error correction and parity checking is usefull when you have a lot of memory
>since thre more memory you have the more you increase the probability of a
>bad read or write in the memory.

    To a point.  You also increase the amount of parity-devoted RAM as well,
and when you couple this with the increasing likelihood it as well may
be problematic, plus the addition of the logic to handle it, it quickly
begins to become an increasingly small return for the effort.

>> Also, parity checking doesn't _fix_ any memory errors, it only guarantees
>> that the machine will _crash_ when a memory error happens. Apparently some
>> people prefer this sort of behavior.
>
>with 10 bits you will be able to correct an 1 bit failure and detect a
>2 bits failure.

    True.  However, the parity checking method used on PC clones uses one
bit for the check, making it capable of detecting a one bit failure, and
unable to make corrections to such problems.

                 ----------------------------------------
           LaMonte Koop -- SCSU Electrical/Computer Engineering
 Internet: lkoop@tigger.stcloud.msus.edu -OR- f00012@kanga.stcloud.msus.edu
              "You mean you want MORE lights on this thing???"
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: pfc@redorc.chi.il.us (Paul Covello)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: How can I get an HD Floppy Drive?
Date: 10 Nov 92 09:20:49 GMT
Organization: Red Oracle Bbs/Network

Does anyone know where I can get my hands on a Commodore High Density Drive?

The dealers here don't seem to know...and while I cannot get a Hard Drive at
this time, an HD drive sure would tide me over. I'm using an a500 with ecs
chips and a 6a motherboard if this helps. and 2.04 (37.175) KS. Thanks.

                                                         ---Paul Frank Covello
                                                          pfc@redorc.chi.il.us
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: gsarff@wicat.com (Gary Sarff)
Subject: Re: Amiga Networking?
Organization: WICAT Systems
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 18:37:12 GMT

easton@zds-oem.zds.com (Jeff Easton) writes:

>In article <009635F3.E97CE580@rhea> treczoks@rhea.Informatik.Uni-Bonn.DE writes:
>>Dear Hardware Hackers,
>>As our Amiga section is loosing ground in our local computer club, we
>>need some sort of networking capability to connect to our club network.
>>Is there a way to connect an Amiga 500 to either Arc- or Ethernet?
>>I've got the SANA-II-drivers on my disk, but all I've seen in the
>>hardware section are Network boards for the ZORRO-II, and nothing,
>>except a preliminary schematics for an arcnet connection on the parallel
>>port, which would connect to an A500.
>  I guess I should admit that I drew up the schematic for the parallel
>port Arcnet adapter.  Funny how that thing gets around.  I'm glad I 
>marked it preliminary, since last week a little birdie visited my...

There are arcnet cards that fit on the expansion port on an amiga 500
I have some of them.  I also have some that fit in a slot in the 2000.  This
is at work, but we have had the cards since at least mid 1988, when I was
hired, and a bit before that.  Part of a discontinued project to use amiga
500's as low cost color graphics terminals to run our educational courseware.
I have been trying to find out who made these cards and if they are 
compatible with any software, but have not had any success.  I have a simple
upload and download program written so I can transfer files from the internet
to my amiga 2000'S floppy to take home to my amiga 4000. 
--------------------------------------------------
From: oakley@cgou11.enet.dec.com (Wayne Oakley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Source for BSC MultiFaceCard II serial/parallel board
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:32:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: e2big.1992Nov9.183236.7313
Reply-To: oakley%cgou11.dec@decwrl.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment. Calgary, Canada.



    An article in the datacomm area recommended the BSC MultiFaceCard II
    for a serial/parallel expansion card providing 2 of each.
    
    The article mentioned a dealer in Italy but nothing for North America.
    
    Does anybody have information on North American Dealers who carry this
    board?  Please post a reply here or send mail directly, if possible 
    please supply a phone number and any other information you might have.
    
    thanks
    
    wayne
    
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: ceg@bret.jpl.nasa.gov (Chuck Goodhart)
Subject: ECC Was: Re: Moving 500 to 1200, BAD NEWS
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Pasadena, CA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:13:28 GMT

In article <H0mXr*h41@dynam.adsp.sub.org>
cbmehq!cbmswi!dynam!jmpor@cbmvax.commodore.com writes:
>with 10 bits you will be able to correct an 1 bit failure and detect a
>2 bits failure.

By my calculations, 12 bits are required for 1 bit correct, 2 bit detect
on 8 data bits.  10 bits will only get you 6 data bits.
-- 
Chuck Goodhart, ceg@bret.jpl.nasa.gov
From: r_moore@vger.nsu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Amiga Hard drive problem.
Date: 8 Nov 92 18:09:01 EDT

Hello !,
   I have a problem with my Amiga's Quantum 210 SCSI drive, upon a cold boot
the drive is very slow to spin up, which causes my HD light to flash and an
extremely long wait for the boot sequence to end(I guess it won't boot until
the drive spins/responds). Can someone give me an idea of what may be wrong ?
If the drive needs to be refurbished how much does that cost roughly ? BTW the
drive has no other known problems...
               Thanks, Richard
From: Aric.Caley@ofa123.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: A1200, SysInfo bench
X-Sender: newtout 0.02 Oct  1 1992
Date: 03 Nov 92  11:03:00

> Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
> From: sallen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Steve Allen)
> Message-ID: 1992Nov2.173933.26512@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Well Ive just had a play with the new 1200, and ran a copy of
> Sysinfo v3.01 on it too see what it can do!
>
> The 68020 is running at 15.2 Mhz, this model with 2 meg CHip ram and no
> fst ram.
>
> Drystones   ;-  1296
> A1200 = 2.2 times faster than A500
>        1.85  times faster than A500 with Fast Ram
>        0.63 times A2500 with 68020 (14Mhz) !!!!!!!!  Why????
>        0.28 times A3000.
>
> Giving 1.35 Mips
>
> Is it impressive. ? Im not so sure rerally   really.

:( :( :(

Obviously, it gave disapointing numbers because of the fact that this thing
has  no  FAST  ram  on  it.   Its  running  out of chip ram.  With fast ram
installed,  you  should  get  a speed increase of roughly double.  SIGH, as
usual  it  looks  like Commodork left out things:  there should be at least
SOME  fast  ram,  and  the clock chip should be built in!  I hope it doesnt
ship  with  an  880K  floppy  but  it  probably  will.  Still a fairly nice
machine,  though,  but geeze!  I hope they at least have a fast ram + clock
card available *real* soon.

 ---------------------------------------------------Given that the universe-
 - Eeny Meeny Miney Moe; George Bush, Bill Clinton -is infinate, and god is-
 -   and Ross Perot!  Its off to the polls we go!  -all powerful, would you-
 ---------------------------------------------------like some toast?       -


--- Maximus 2.00
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: dingebre@imp.sim.es.com (David Ingebretsen)
Subject: Re: AGA and a 3000 ? possibility
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Keywords: spam, semprini, Bruce, ni
Reply-To: dingebre@imp.sim.es.com (David Ingebretsen)
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp., Salt Lake City, UT
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 22:09:14 GMT


In article <1992Nov10.102736.2757@brandonu.ca>, brycerw@brandonu.ca writes:
> In article <copes.721284992@marsh>, copes@cs.curtin.edu.au (Simon Cope) writes:
> > boing@mcl.ucsb.edu (Geff Hanoian) writes:
> > 
> > 
> >>	 I've been told "NO!" a few times but I was thinking about it again
> >>	 and I thought of something.  Now, I'm not the Engineering type,

some deleted...

> > An 040 card alone will cost more than a trade up to a4000.  (at present)
> > 

I saw an add from Creative Computers for an `040 card for a 3000 priced at
about $850. How do I "trade up" to an A4000 from an A3000 for $850? Because,
if I can, I would do it in a second, well it may take two (years) to save up 
the money.

-- 
	David

	Disclaimer: The content of this message in no way reflects the
	            opinions of my employer, nor are my actions
		    encouraged, supported, or acknowledged by my
		    employer.
From: Roger_Nordin@atb.bbs.bad.se (Roger Nordin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: I've seen the 1200
Date: Wed,  4 Nov 92 06:09:31 +0000
Reply-To: Roger_Nordin@atb.bbs.bad.se (Roger Nordin)
Distribution: world
Organization: ANet Test Bench, Karlstad, Sweden 
OD-Comment-To: Internet_Gateway

> 4mb 32 bit fast memory in CPU slot, additional
> 4mb of 16 bit in PCMCIA slot

So, you put 4Mb on a card that plugs into the CPU slot, or what? Is this card 
available yet, and what is the approx price? What RAM chips does it use?

> There is not battery backed up clock, it's an
> option!!!

On the motherboard? How is this supposed to be connected, is there a socket 
for the chip, or a socket/connector to plug in a clock module? Or is it 
supposed to go into the CPU slot too?

                        _       .    __
    Roger Nordin     _ //      /!Net /est Bench
 2:203/602.0@fidonet \X/  Internet: Roger_Nordin@bad.se

---
From: jsurace@cco.caltech.edu (Jason A. Surace)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: A3000,1.3,2.0 HELP!!!
Date: 8 Nov 1992 09:23:26 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu



  Well, basically you're out of luck. Only the early A3000's
(like mine) had the option to boot 1.3. This was included
because the machines were shipped with a beta version of WB 2.0,
which I can certainly testify was very buggy and crashed frequently,
and had very little compatability. Once 2.0 was stabilized as
2.04, they were shipped with 2.04 only.


                                      - Jason Surace

                                       jason@ipac.caltech.edu
From: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: does this device exist?
Date: 12 Nov 92 08:06:54 GMT
Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA

In article <69221@cup.portal.com> joeles@cup.portal.com (Joel Edward Swan) writes:
> >In article <BxD6o6.E34@fc.hp.com> koren@fc.hp.com (Steve Koren) writes:
> >> Martin Black (22black@sol.cs.wmich.edu) wrote:
> >>
> >> > Well Any genlock should work.  Just bring up a black screen on your amiga,
> >> > and you will be able just amiga m to it.  Of course they are like $200.
> >>
> >> That is the wrong direction.  All the genlock advertizements I see say
> >> "NTSC Composite video out".  That's not what I need; I want NTSC _in_, and
> >> analog (separated) RGB out.  But thanks anyway.
> >
> >All the Commodore genlocks have had both RGB and Composite out.  Still, it's
> >pretty expensive.  If you want a nice composite monitor for your TV or VCR,
> >just pick up a spare 1080 or one of the Commodore C64 color monitors.  Even
> >the cheaper computer monitors look beautiful as composite video monitors.
> 
> You STILL don't get it.  He wants an EXTERNAL COMPOSITE input to be
> transcoded to an RGB output.  The CBM genlocks only give you the AMIGA VIDEO
> as RGB out.

Since when?

-- 
George Robbins - now working for,     work:   to be avoided at all costs...
but no way officially representing:   uucp:   {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
Commodore, Engineering Department     domain: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com