HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: perez@mgr.hjf.org (Charles Perez)
Newsgroups: alt.peeves,alt.tasteless
Subject: Re: peeve o' the day
Date: 20 Aug 92 15:07:30 GMT
Organization: HJF AIDS Research Project, Washington DC

In article <1992Aug16.074507.3692@mr.med.ge.com> hinz@picard.med.ge.com (David Hinz Mfg 4-6987) writes:
>Andrew Clayton (dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au) wrote:
>: In article <1992Aug12.172629.13746@javelin.sim.es.com>, tim clinkenpeel writes:
>: > today i found namfucklfuckss' lost pagfuckr ffuckstfuckring
>: > undfuckr thfuck copybfuckast whilst playing with doom marblfuck
>: > jr.  instfuckad of gratitudfuck i gfuckt accusations of
>: > thifuckvfuckry.
>: > 
>: > a woodfuckn-hfuckadfuckd thfuckory--what would i havfuck with
>: > dual pagfuckrs?  thfuck fucknvy of suburban hoodlums?  not
>: > dfucksirfuckd.
>: > 
>: > i'm prfucksfuckntly contfuckmplating sodomizing namfucklfuckss
>: > with a gardfuckn wfuckasfuckl (tm).
>: > 
>: > not only would it allfuckviatfuck thfuck angst, but would
>: > crfuckatfuck a mulch that is bfucknfuckficial to my gardfuckn.
>: 
>
>Interesting....anyone else notice there is no letter 'e' in the entire
>paragraph above?  Hmmmmm...this means something.

Hmmm... If you had a clue, maybe you'd figure out what has replaced
every 'e' in the passage you are talking about.

Go back to the body shop and get a brain that works, if you can find
one that's not been squicked. Gives a new meaning to "you've got a
hole in your head", eh?

>
>ObTasteless: Melba toast.

Yeah, that's true. At least your half-squicked brain is good for
something.

Serious .sig follows, because I can't make it shut up.
-- 
==========================================================================
That which is necessary is never evil. If an evil seems necessary, look
to your context; that's where its root lies.  - Charles Perez
==========================================================================
From: 01sybok@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Subject: Re: The Seminal Seminars of our Age
Date: 22 Aug 92 16:57:58 GMT
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In article <92Aug21.013639.27445@acs.ucalgary.ca>, parr@acs.ucalgary.ca (Charles Parr) writes:


>Don will share his experiences 
          ^^^^^     ^^^^^^^^^^^

I don't know about anyone else, but these my two least favorite words. If I
hear them both in a sentence, my ears automatically bleed. If I were you, 
Charles, I'd attend that conference. Wait till just before dear ol' Don is
about to speak and say, "Don, I'd like to say something" (make sure everyone
can hear you). 

	Don, being the SNAG (Sensitive New Age Guy (tm)) that he is, will
assume you are for real. He'll say, "Yes?"

	Ask him, "Are we going to be sharing experiences in this conference?"

	He will smile (no doubt) and say "Why, yes we are."

	Howl at the top of your lungs: "IF I WANTED TO SHARE EXPERIENCES, 
I'D GO TO AN ORGY!!!!!!!!!" Then walk out.

I guarantee nobody in the conference will take Don seriously after that.


Just a thought.
Mike
From: egpv29@castle.ed.ac.uk (JHenderson)
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Subject: Re: Brookside
Date: 20 Aug 92 09:15:22 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

In article <25018@castle.ed.ac.uk> tjc@castle.ed.ac.uk (A J Cunningham) writes:
=>egpv29@castle.ed.ac.uk (JHenderson) writes:
=>
=>>In article <9208181038.AA09181@merlin.comlab.ox.ac.uk> Gordon.Riddell@prg.oxford.ac.uk writes:
=>>=>Far be it from me to correct you again but it was quite clearly stated before
=>>=>Margaret attended her papist shrine with the randy Father Derek that she was
=>>=>a good and wholesome Protestant.
=>
=>>I have been informed by a source I trust, namely my little sister, that
=>>Margaret is indeed a Protestant. Happy now?
=>
=>I thought the issue was not Margaret's religion but the size of her
=>chest compared to the new nanny's (i.e. vanishingly small).

That is, of course, the Real Issue, but somewhere along the line we got
sidetracked by some somnambulist from the City of Perspiring Dreams.


-- 
==================================================================
-Jeremy Henderson            |  Une souris verte
 egpv29@castle.ed.ac.uk	     |  Qui courrait dans l'herbe
==================================================================
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
From: charless@sco.COM (charles stross)
Subject: Re: Clothes that fit
Organization: The Somewhat Contagious Operation, Inc.
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 14:50:09 GMT


In article <24725@castle.ed.ac.uk> egev05@castle.ed.ac.uk (B A Page) writes:
>In article <17426@autodesk.COM> booter@Autodesk.COM (Elaine Richards) writes:
>
>>I bought cheapo shoes for $30? I wore them five times and the soles
>>fell off. I was livid.
>
>I sympathise.
>
>This is a severe problem for one who is officially in Severe Financial
>Difficulties TM.  I.e. me.  I have recently taken to buying VERY cheap
>shoes (5 quid a pair thats 10 bucks or so) and wearing them until they
>fall apart.  

Suggestion: Warsaw Pact or NATO surplus. About a year ago I payed
fifteen quid for a pair of unworn but second-hand Dutch paratroop
boots, fleece-lined and waterproof, which are built for jumping out
of planes in and being run over by tanks. No, the soles don't
fall off. They' ain't exactly high fashion, but if you need to 
kick the shit out of somebody they'd probably come in handy and
they're great for walking through puddles or snowdrifts.

If NATO gear is too expensive, there's lots of East German army 
stuff floating around at low cost right now. Genuine pigskin-
lined German army jackboots for a tenner, T-56 tanks for 
only the cost of a new Range Rover, even a MiG-29 for the
discerning connoiseur with #250,000 to blow on a _very_ fast
executive jet ...

-- 
This .sig file has been rescued by the Sigfile Liberation Front
From: 01sybok@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Subject: Re: Why can't I work in Europe?
Date: 15 Aug 92 13:41:51 -0300
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In article <1992Aug13.171626.26262@igor.tamri.com>, donb@igor.tamri.com (Don Baldwin) writes:
> In article <92225.19:10:48.093195.K42@vm.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
> K42@vm.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (Monika Best) writes:
>>01sybok@ac.dal.ca writes:
> 
> Hmmm, I wonder if maybe sybok actually received job offers; maybe they
> send offers to Americans IN German, so that you won't take the job unless
> you're capable of reading the letter?!
> 
Nahhh... this letter had that rejection letter look about it. I wonder if 
Japanese rejection letters look like German rejection letters, which seem to 
look just like English language rejection letters.

Mike
Newsgroups: alt.peeves,misc.consumers,rec.skiing
From: kucharsk@solbourne.com (William Kucharski)
Subject: Re: wrong health care, and WON'T pay for it
Keywords: malpractice, negligence
Organization: Solbourne Computer, Inc., Longmont, CO
Distribution: alt
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 00:07:47 GMT

While reading article <4051@novavax.UUCP>, I noticed that
vaccaro@novavax.UUCP (N. Trafford Vaccaro) said the following:
 >I would urge the snow skiiers(sp?) out there to avoid Winter Park
 >Colorado for a vacation. For a synopsis of why:
 >
 >	1) I go to Winter Park to go skiing
 >	2) I get incredible abdominal pain, can hardly breathe
 >	3) I go to the 7-Mile Clinic, they keep me there all day
 >	4) At 5 pm, they release me, telling me to take pain med.
 >		(FOR ABDOMINAL PAIN of UNKNOWN CAUSES??!?!?!?)

[ ... ]

I would say that although this was a bad experience, the big thing is that
Winter Park had nothing to do with it.  While the 7-Mile Clinic may have been
(and may still be) a bunch of incompetent morons, that shouldn't reflect on
Winter Park and is kind of like saying "don't go to Chicago; I ate at a bad
restaurant there once."

Winter Park is a great place to ski, and I heartily recommend it (although
not on the days I'm there. :-) )
-- 
| William Kucharski, Solbourne Computer, Inc.     | Opinions expressed above
| Internet: kucharsk@solbourne.com   Ham: N0OKQ   | are MINE alone, not those
| Snail Mail: 1900 Pike Road, Longmont, CO  80501 | of Solbourne Computer, Inc.
| President, "Just the Ten of Us" Fan Club        | "Dittos from Longmont, CO"
From: booter@Autodesk.COM (Elaine Richards)
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Subject: Re: !Peeve of the century
Date: 17 Aug 92 18:56:38 GMT
Organization: Autodesk, Inc., Sausalito, CA

In article <1992Aug13.174324.18689@highlite.uucp> yarvin@highlite.uucp (Curtis Yarvin) writes:
>In article <5685@catnip.berkeley.ca.us> bandy@catnip.berkeley.ca.us (Footloose and Fancy Free) writes:
>>
>>Got a phone call from my lawyer yesterday!!!!!!!
>
>What, suing news.admin for slander & gross defamation of character?
>
>c

No, he divorced me. And if you want a beer next time you run into me,
you'll drop this thread. :-)


ER


--

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I can't help it, I was born sneering."
			-Pooh Bah
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
From: esther@verdix.com (Esther Lumsdon)
Subject: solicited on a selective basis...
Keywords: direct-mail, stupid
Organization: Verdix Corp.
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 19:03:12 GMT

I received this solicitation last week:

Dear Singles, Couples, and Corporations,

You have been invited to explore an innovative concept which hundreds of
successful, professional adult members of the workaholic generation have found
eliminates the frustration resulting from a longer work week and a shrinking
social like.  It's called Club Ajay.

In a land far away, Ajay is a name given to one whose innate attitude is so
positive that he or she is incapable of acknowledging failure or defeat --
possessing the ability to perceive a short-term mathematical or philosophical
loss as just that, where others would concede to defeat.

[ more paragraphs about ambiance of social activity, parties, travel,
winners flocking together, and social cuisine.]

Club Ajay memberships are not available to the public at large, but solicited
on a selective basis; therefore, we have enclosed a short qualifying Social
Profile for you to fill out and return.


This selective invitation was addressed to:
     RESIDENT
     RURAL ROUTE BOXHOLDER
     CENTREVILLE, VA 22020

Yeah, this company is highly selective.
Did they select recipients based on desirable zip codes?  What's an undesirable
zip code in Fairfax County, Virginia?  If I move there can I be guaranteed
that these people won't send me junk mail?

Club Ajay:  new horizons in recycling volume
-- 
------ Esther Lumsdon   employed by, not speaking for, Verdix Corporation
     It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice.
  esther@verdix.com  or  esther%verdix.com@uunet.uu.net   
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
From: artn@bert.eecs.uic.edu (Ellyn Sandor)
Subject: Re: PRO-smoker's peeves
Keywords: Tobacco Nicotine
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 23:20:17 GMT

bberbeni@nyx.cs.du.edu (Bill Berbenich) writes:
>Smoking is bad for you.  No doubt you were drawn into the habit by that
>heinous cartoon camel.

Start a new thread.  I'll read it. Maybe.  This is my first time (I think)
posting here, and I'd rather not be flamed.  Start a new thread. It's real
easy.  Call it ANTI-smoker's peeves, not PRO-smoker's peeves.  Got it?

Read the start of my post again.

(not that I mind your peeves, as such, that's not the point.)

	Stephan 
-- 
--
Stephan Meyers | artn@uicbert.eecs.uic.edu
(Art)^n Laboratories, inventors of the Stealth Negative PHSCologram
(312) 567-3762
From: banta@blagg.Eng.Sun.COM (242 lbs before cooking)
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Subject: Re: Political Peeves
Date: 19 Aug 92 14:56:17 GMT
Organization: Sun, Moon, and Stars
NNTP-Posting-Host: blagg

(Dan Sorenson) writes:
>	This reminds me -- I heard part of Reagan's speech, and I laughed
>my ass off.  In reference to the "new" democratic party claiming they
>were moderates, Reagan said, "And they call *me* an actor!"  I had to
>clean coffee off my computer I laughed so hard.

Actually, I liked his line concerning Clinton being a Jeffersonian:
"I *knew* Thomas Jefferson, and he [Clinton] is no Thomas Jefferson."

Somewhere in this country is a speech writer that actually earned his
pay.

andy
banta@abingdon.sun.com
--
"If you add a teaspoon of wine to a barrel of sewage, you get sewage.
If you add a teaspoon of sewage to a barrel of wine, you get sewage.
This, my son, is entropy."
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
From: alex@vmars.tuwien.ac.at (Alexander Vrchoticky)
Subject: Re: Mike Sybok learns about human anatomy
Organization: Technical University Vienna, Dept. for Realtime Systems, AUSTRIA
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 09:08:29 GMT

01sybok@ac.dal.ca writes:

>c) We're usually doing the nasty before I have time to notice any lubrication

tsk, tsk, tsk. how inconsiderate. 

-alex

-- 
Alexander Vrchoticky             alex@vmars.tuwien.ac.at
TU Vienna, CS/Real-Time Systems  +43/1/58801-8168
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
From: nolan@twg.com (All ears, virtually)
Subject: Desirous of tales (was Bill Goes to Peevetown)
Reply-To: nolan@twg.com
Organization: Quidnuncs Unanimous
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 22:20:21 GMT


In article <1992Aug18.130743.15470@dg-rtp.dg.com>, cochran@spam.rtp.dg.com 
 (A. Jing Hippy) writes:
|>In article <9208171954.AA15622@tesla.eedsp.gatech.edu.gatech.edu>, eedsp!bill@gatech.UUCP (Bill Berbenich) writes:
|>|> 
|>|> Rather ironic that I should meet the western peevers before I meet
|>|> homeboy and fairly-nearby peever, Dave "A. Jing" Cochran.
|>
|>Life, as they say, is strange.
|>
|>So is the little guy that sells the newspapers down on the corner, but 
|>that's another story.

Do tell! Please! 

Peeve: overaged flower children who setcha up fer a tale and then leave ya
hangin'.

--
Nolan "Gather 'round cats and I'll tell you a story" Hinshaw
Internet: nolan@twg.com			Dingalingnet: (415)962-7197	
"If you don't know how to do something, you don't know how to do it
 with a computer." David Wittenberg, in Risks Digest 13.70
"Boy, was I in for a dose of reality." Randall K. Abler
"... necrophilia doesn't really hurt anybody."  Rick Gordon
"Well, first of all, your stance is too wide"

Newsgroups: alt.peeves
From: bberbeni@nyx.cs.du.edu (Bill Berbenich)
Subject: Re: PRO-smoker's peeves
Keywords: Tobacco Nicotine
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 19:26:23 GMT

In <1992Aug12.181901.13621@bert.eecs.uic.edu> artn@bert.eecs.uic.edu (Ellyn Sandor) writes:

Ellyn/Stephan:

Smoking is bad for you.  No doubt you were drawn into the habit by that
heinous cartoon camel.

>Peeve:	Car ashtrays you can't reach while you're driving.  I prefer a
>	window, anyway, but having the option would be nice, without
>	having to take my eyes off the road.

Reminds me of a peeve:
Smokers who use the world as their ashtray.

Near the doorway to any publicly-accessible building, although there may be
an ashtray, there will inevitably be butts all over.  In the grass, on the
walkway, in the shrubberies.  (The SHRUBBERIES?)

At any road intersection, there is always the smoker who will blithely toss
his butt outta the car.  I'm no enviro-whacko, but great crotch rot of
Mohammed!  If you don't want the damned thing in your own car after you
smoked it, what makes you think everyone else wants to put up with  such
a smelly, smouldering eyesore?  One time (and one time only), when I lived
in the Beigh Arya, some peabrain tossed out a lit butt at a traffic
intersection.  I was on foot, waiting to cross.  I walked over to the butt,
picked it up, tossed it behind the seat of this punk's ToYOta low rider,
and calmly said "You dropped this."  He got out of his truck and yelled
racial epithets at me.  I dropped back behind a cinder block wall while
he had his back to me as he tried to get the lit butt outta his trucklet.

The dude was SERIOUS big, but didn't look very fast and I was sure he
wouldn't leave his truck alone to come chase me.  Besides, his smoke
encrusted lungs woulda caused him to drop to the ground gasping after
having chased me for a couple o' hundred yards.
--
"Among free peoples, the open exchange of ideas
ultimately is our greatest security." - President Ronald Reagan
From: 01sybok@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Subject: Re: Why can't I work in Europe?
Date: 14 Aug 92 13:18:59 GMT
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In article <24776@castle.ed.ac.uk>, adam@castle.ed.ac.uk (Adam Hamilton) writes:
> In article <1992Aug11.174450.6919@ac.dal.ca> 01sybok@ac.dal.ca writes:

>The remainder (that's 20%, by the
> way) misread the signature as "Mike Smurf" and decided that they didn't want
> an employee with a blue pointed head (and please don't whine to this group
> that its not THAT pointed).

Alright. It's not thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat blue.

Mike (La La lala la la...)
Xref: sparky alt.peeves:13677 misc.consumers:15339 rec.skiing:5331
From: vaccaro@novavax.UUCP (N. Trafford Vaccaro)
Newsgroups: alt.peeves,misc.consumers,rec.skiing
Subject: wrong health care, and WON'T pay for it
Keywords: malpractice, negligence
Date: 19 Aug 92 14:53:30 GMT
Distribution: alt
Organization: Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, FL

Hello, everyone,

Thank you very much for you support! I received numerous e-mails from
concerned people who had good advice. I consulted a couple of lawyers
and was given advice to help battle the collection agency. I cannot
sue the clinic involved because of the statute of limitations, but
I could have, and SHOULD have. Because I was just thinking how to
survive this thing, the thought of attempting to tarnish a doctor's
reputation with a malpractice suit never entered my mind. According
to two different attorneys, the clinic could have been sued for
negligence. I explained to the doctor at the clinic what happened,
and he just yelled at me and suggested I pay the bill. I have a rather
large family, and anyone who undergoes medical care will be under my
close scrutiny as a result of the arrogance of this "untouchable"
professional. 

If I wasn't in such incredible pain and pursued the matter of obtaining
medical attention, who knows what would have happened. If I had died,
which almost happened, it would have been a matter of record where
I sought medical attention, and a massive lawsuit would have resulted
when the clinic's doings were revealed.

I would urge the snow skiiers(sp?) out there to avoid Winter Park
Colorado for a vacation. For a synopsis of why:

	1) I go to Winter Park to go skiing
	2) I get incredible abdominal pain, can hardly breathe
	3) I go to the 7-Mile Clinic, they keep me there all day
	4) At 5 pm, they release me, telling me to take pain med.
		(FOR ABDOMINAL PAIN of UNKNOWN CAUSES??!?!?!?)
	5) I asked them where a hospital was, they didn't tell me.
	6) They did not refer me to another doctor
	7) I was bleeding to death internally, and they kicked me out
	   at 5 pm because they were closing.
	8) 5 hours later, I requested an ambulance from the guy at the
	   desk of the rental condo. He said the ambulance won't pick
	   me up unless I have 50 dollars up front. It cost me almost
	   everything to go on this ski trip to begin with, and I was
	   almost broke.
	9) The guy at the desk was nice enough to give me a ride to the
	   nearest hospital, WHICH WAS 14 MILES AWAY!!!!!
	10) From there, a real doctor ordered the humanitarian 
	    ambulance company to take me to Denver, where I had a
	    ruptured spleen and a collapsed lung.

Boring, huh? I tell you what: always, ALWAYS get a second opinion, or
even a third if something is ailing you or a loved one. Most doctors
will respect that request, and if they don't, get another doctor.

Whew!

Take it easy.


NTV
From: tim@physics.orst.edu (Tim Mefford)
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Subject: Re: The unbearable shitsubo of being
Keywords: Losers
Date: 19 Aug 92 22:31:13 GMT
Reply-To: tim@physics.orst.edu
Followup-To: alt.peeves
Organization: Up the,

Imagine yourself in a warm bed in a very cold room.  Imagine
further that you are very tired and are only half awake from
having already slept five hours.  Your bladder is full, just 
this side of actually being painful.  You are very groggy and 
getting out of bed into the cold would wake you up.  This is my
version of the Catholic concept of limbo.  Not an ethereal lack
of sensation, but rather a sucky no-win situation.

!peeve: After years of claiming that Lee jeans fit whereas Levi's
did not, Levi's themselves have capitulated and conceded the point.
They did this by coming out with a new label of "loose-fitting"
Levi's.  Of course, for the trendy in the audience, "Classic" Levi's
will continue to be available without even a public letter writing
campaign to bring them back.

How about Woody Allen?  He files a custody suit for three children
and then admits to being in a relationship with his 21 year old 
adopted daughter.  Actually Mia Farrow might have had sole custody 
over the 21 year-old involved, but still, I think he'll be losing 
that suit.  Talk about screwing the -- let me rephrase that -- 
shooting yourself in the foot!  I guess the Lolita themes in Manhatten
and his upcoming picture were a little more personal than I thought. 

ObPeeve:  The powers that be here have decreed a resuffling of offices.
I am not personally affected, but a friend out of the country is.  No
problem, except for the five day notice to remove all personal effects.
So I have the choice of letting the incompetent baboons who arranged
this crisis man handle my friend's posessions, or of taking a couple 
hours of my own time to do it.  I suppose I will do the latter and present 
a bill for services rendered upon his return.


ObBob: Knieval

-- 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The wages of sin are death, but the benefits include dental, major
medical, two week paid vacation, pension fund, and stock options.
Actually, taken as a package, it's a rather attractive deal.
          Tim Mefford___________________tim@physics.orst.edu
From: scott@festival.ed.ac.uk (Scott Larnach)
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Subject: Re: PRO-smoker's peeves
Keywords: Tobacco Nicotine
Date: 14 Aug 92 14:38:05 GMT

artn@bert.eecs.uic.edu (Ellyn Sandor) writes:

>Peeve:  Militant Ex-Smokers.

I suppose it's the same fundamental of human nature that guarantees
that the most extravagant Bible-thumper is the ex junkie / bank robber
/ sheepdog molester / Tory M.P. who's "seen the light".

I wonder, in passing, why metaphorically sticking your head under a
blanket is referred to as "seeing the light".

>	Places that don't have your brand.  Now, if you smoke an off-brand,
>	I understand.  But WHY would a store run out of Marloboro Light?

Didn't you know: they're in mourning for the Malboro Cowboy, who died
of ---- ------. You can guess; it was something appropriate.

>Peeve:	My wife, in the morning.

Your wife, Ellyn? You're not being entirely straight with us here, are
you?

>	This wouldn't be so bad, except any real smoker is a total asshole in
>	the morning until their first cigarette.

I have to put you straight on this one, by providing the single
counterexample needed. Me, that is. Before my first ciggie, I'm not a
total asshole at all. Or even a total arsehole.

Before my first ciggie, I am a total bastard. But that's not
necessarily the same thing at all.

( I think you Youessanians should try putting the 'r' back into
'arsehole'. There's so much more feeling you can put into it, so to
speak, with the 'r' in there. Go on, try it, _Roll_ that 'r'. Put some
beef into it. Ahem - so to speak, that is. )

S
Organization: HAM--Hackers Against MUDs
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 19:05:26 EDT
From: Joy Haftel <JKH107@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.peeves
Subject: Re: Mechanics and their ilk
 <1992Aug19.161559.7932@umbc3.umbc.edu>

In article <1992Aug19.161559.7932@umbc3.umbc.edu>, potler@umbc4.umbc.edu (Laura
Potler (GSFC)) says:
>
>did you check the odometer? maybe they went joy riding in your hot rod...?
>
What I hate is when they *leave* the Roy Rogers bag in your car...

Joy Haftel               "You purchase pain with all that joy can give,
JKH107@PSUVM              And die of nothing but a rage to live."
                                      --Pope