HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: SciFi Channel not on NE Continental Cablevision!
From: flash@lopez.marquette.MI.US (Gary Bourgois,Hamshack)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 16:05:33 EDT
Organization: Great White North/UPLink


Time to DUMP cable and get a satellite dish, folks.  Satellite is NOT as
expensive as you think.  My first system cost me $40.  I now have about $300
invested.  If you shop around, you can easily get a full bells and whistle
system for around $1000.  Subscription programming (like the SCI FI CHANNEL)
will require you add a VIDEOCYPHER II+ decoder, and also pay for the
subscription, but the advantage is YOU decide what you want to watch.  If
your cable company does not carry SCI FI CHANNEL or COMEDY CENTRAL or any of
the HUNDREDS of other nifty things on satellite, then come over to
rec.video.satellite and find out more.

Not to mention hundreds of fascinating news and sports feeds you can get
free, and about 1000 audio (radio type) signals.



--
    /   Gary Bourgois, WB8EOH, The Birdwatcher: Marquette Michigan  USA   \
   ([-o ~ Tune FRIDAY NIGHT LIVE!  S3/21 6.2. Fridays from 9-midnight ~ o-])
    \  Now a snazzy new DOMAIN address!  flash@lopez.marquette.mi.us      /
        GEnie: SIGNALS   FAX: (906) 228-7477    GWN BBS: (906) 228-4399
From: ekho.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: B7:  Servalan
Date: 30 Jul 92 03:30:23 GMT
Organization: Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton

boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com writes:

>Ultimate survivor or no- all it would have taken was for Avon to screw
>with me just once (e.g. try to flush me out an airlock, leave me on a
>desolate world) for the sake of his own skin and I would have blasted 
him
>into little Avon bits.

  Now, now, let's not belittle the man... He was living in a world where 
it was _very probable_ that you would get killed!  Think about how it 
would be to actually _live_ in a place like that!  A fanzine called "The 
Imaginary Cheeseboard" was able to make me realize that by having Avon 
teleported to a Chicago convention, replacing the unwary Paul Darrow (who 
played Avon) on the Liberator!  When Avon was about to return, well, the 
people he was with suddenly understood how they were sending him, in 
fact, to his death!  They also saw the danger that Paul Darrow was in... 
(His story on the Liberator is called "The Other Side of the Coin")
(And, sorry; that other title is "The _Totaly_ Imaginary Cheeseboard")

  Any comments, discussion?  Maybe we can carry this thread to 
rec.arts.tv.uk and improve the atmosphere there... :-)  Or E-mail me if 
you like (I luv discushuns! ;-) )  Stay Safe! ;-}


         Yours in Time and Space,


              Ekho (Killer Queen, Dynamite with a Laser Beam)
From: sallylb@netcom.com (Sally Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Quantum Leap
Date: 27 Jul 92 23:20:45 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <9207272100.AA26648@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> pvitaris@emubus ("Vitaris Paula") writes:
>TO:  Sally Smith

Hi Paula, I tried reaching you via e-mail but couldn't. Thanks for 
posting and let me know when you get the tape transcribed.

The usual apologies to the rest of the net for wasting the bandwidth...

Sally



-- 
Sally Smith (510)790-0608  sallylb@netcom.com (I was sally@tardis.tymnet.com)
I'm unemployed--these opinions *must* be mine!
"Don't investigate this too closely." -- Don Bellisario, re: "Quantum Leap"
"The show speaks to the person we would all like to be--kinder, more
compassionate." -- *ME* in this week's TV Guide, re: "Quantum Leap"
From: rubinoff@linc.cis.upenn.edu (Robert Rubinoff)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Asimov / Heinlein
Date: 21 Jul 92 20:09:54 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Jul21.184958.8884@athena.cs.uga.edu> shimkus@athena.cs.uga.edu (Peter Gambit) writes:
>Some time ago, Asimov collaborated with Harlan Ellison on a Robot screenplay.
>It was never produced, but the script was facinating.

It wasn't a collaboration.  Ellison wrote the screenplay himself, based loosely
on the Robot stories.  Asimov wasn't involved at all, although he indicated
that he thought it was well done and approved of the changes Ellison made in
the process of converting the stories to a new medium.

The screenplay was printed in Asimov's (I think) a few years ago.  It was
indeed quite good, in my (humble) opinion.

   Robert
From: jimj@cleanplate.EBay.Sun.COM (James D. Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Asimov / Heinlein
Date: 23 Jul 92 15:53:27 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: cleanplate.ebay.sun.com

In article <63985@hydra.gatech.EDU> ccocsme@prism.gatech.EDU (StatMan) writes:
<  Hopefully this has not already been said yet...
<
<  Asimov's 'Nightfall' was made into a movie about 4-5 years ago. Dont remember
<much about it, except that is was not very good and it had a lot of sex in
<it for some reason.

Asimov was also involved with the movie "Fantastic Voyage," and indeed
wrote a book by that name.  But I don't remember if the movie was based on
the book, or if the book was based on the movie.  

"Fantastic Voyage..."  pretty lame now, but pretty good if you were 10
in 1965.  I still remember watching the antibodies eat Donald Pleasance.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Wanted: MST3K KTMA-TV 23 episodes!
From: jenkins@local.host
Date: 20 Jul 92 13:38:24 -0600
Reply-To: jenkins@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu
Organization: Organization, City, State, etc.


I am looking for the original episodes from _Mystery Science Theater 3000_ 
which were aired on KTMA-TV 23 in Minneapolis.

If anyone has *ANY* copies, good or bad, partial or whole, please contact me.

Lisa                         Jenkins@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu
1603 Thirteenth Street South
Moorhead, Minnesota 56560-3734

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
This has been a test of the emergency broadcast system.
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: ludwigj@CS.ColoState.EDU (Vilkata (Joe Ludwig))
Subject: Re: Sci-fi channel in austin
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 05:59:52 GMT
Distribution: co 
Organization: Thealir Construction Company

In article <15acc2INNi6o@cs.utexas.edu> ubiquity@cs.utexas.edu (Richard Hoffman) writes:
>Do you love science fiction?  Would you like to see Dr. Who, the
>Hitchhiker's Guide, Blake's 7, Buck Rogers, Battlestar Gallactica,
>Red Dwarf, and other classic sci-fi tv shows again?  (Yes, Star Trek
>is already carried in Austin, but can you ever get enough?)  Would
>you enjoy viewing the great (and awful) sci-fi movies once again?
Well, since the Austin distributing obviously didn't work...
Do any of you know of any efforts to get the SF channel here in Ft. Collins?


-- 
+-----------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Vilkata, the Dark King      |   "My sister was an only child        |
| ludwigj@cs.colostate.edu    |        and you abused her!"           |
| Vilkata@Most MUCKs          | "Stamp out and eliminate redundancy"  |
From: STU_GLMCELHA@VAX1.ACS.JMU.EDU (Greg McElhatton)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: SF-LOVERS Digest   V17 #383
Date: 30 Jul 92 04:44:25 GMT

Well, I saw "Shada" about a year ago, and had a copy of the script
(the latter a bad xerox) sitting next to me...  It's NOT worth any
large sum of money, believe me.

-Greg
From: rsopicki@pro-amber.cts.com (Randy Sopicki)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Human Target
Date: 26 Jul 92 10:16:12 GMT
Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA

Just finished the opener. The show may have potential.
From: netnews@leadsv.UUCP (Leads Network News)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Star Cops
Keywords: Star Cops, Boucher ,BBCn
Date: 27 Jul 92 23:20:31 GMT
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale

>
>A while back I caught some episodes of a British series entitled "Star Cops"
>on WLIW.  As I was only in the NY area for a visit, I didn't get a chance to
From: mcfar@color3.UUCP (Lincoln McFarland)
From: boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com (The Man from Another Place)
Subject: FANTASTIC VOYAGE (Re: Asimov / Heinlein)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 08:35:24 GMT

In article <1992Jul24.193521.2246@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>, baylor@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com writes...

} If I recall correctly, Asimov wrote the book from the movie, but the
} movie was written from a book by some French author.

You don't recall correctly.

FASTASTIC VOYAGE was a completely original movie. It was not based on a
book by any author, French or otherwise.

I *think* you may be confusing this with PLANET OF THE APES, which was
based on the book MONKEY PLANET by French author Pierre Boulle.

-- 

	"She's my radiation baby.
	 She's my teenage fallout girl."

--- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC, "The Mill", Maynard, MA)

    boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Arbitron Address
From: gunthar@vax1.mankato.msus.edu
Date: 22 Jul 92 16:21:45 -0600
Organization: Mankato State University

This information is given simply for ammusement.  It is not indended to be
used in any form of letter writing campaign in suport of any television show.

The address to send Arbitron 'TV diaries' is:

Arbitron Ratings
4320 Ammendale Road
Beltsville, MD 20705-1194
From: clark@daffy.tmc.edu (Matthew Clark)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Human Target
Date: 27 Jul 92 16:02:31 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of South Florida, Department of Computer Science and Engineering

In article <1992Jul21.161441.2841@nntp.uoregon.edu> eric_gorr@coglab_psych.uoregon.edu (eric gorr) writes:
>In article <9207210359.AB01040@rutgers.edu>, IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU
>(MacPhil) writes:
>> For the longterm comix [sic] readers, what do you think of the
>> latest incarnation from the 70s (Human Target) compared to
>> the print version ?
>It was an ok start...I think the main problem (and fatal?) problem this
>show will have is in the variety of plots it can do....

That depends.  If they fall into the "Star Trek" trap of trying to
have each and every episode be completely self-contained, then
I agree.  However, there is serious potential if they know how to
exploit it (which I doubt they will)

After all, when the pilot (I forget his name) implies in the 1st
episode that Chance may be more than human, that certianly opened
a few doors.  The idea that Chance is nothing more than a highly
trained individual has/is being done already.  (Look at Raven...)

 ________  ______   _   _   
|_   _|  \/  |   \ | | |_|   EEEEEEEE XX   XX PPPPPPP   OOOOOOO
  | | |      |  \ \| |  _    EE        XX XX  PP    PP OO     OO
  |_| |_|\/|_|_| \___| |_|   EEEEE      XXX   PPPPPPP  OO     OO
clark@galadriel.csee.usf.edu EE        XX XX  PP       OO     OO
clark@jupiter.csee.usf.edu   EEEEEEEE XX   XX PP        OOOOOOO
From: lopresti@henson.cc.wwu.edu (lopresti robert)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: new series: TIME TRAX
Date: 21 Jul 92 18:04:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: henson.1992Jul21.180401.3071
Organization: Western Washington University


July 13 issue of Broadcasting reports on 2 new series, TIME TRAX and
BABYLON 5.  

Time Trax is being created/coproduced by Harve Bennett of Star Trek
movies fame.  Filming has just begun in Australia (supposedly cheaper than
US) and the show will premiere in January.  (It is being syndicated by
Warner).

200 years in future Dr Sahmbi has developed a time machine, but people can
only make one round trip.  Unable to get standard funding, Dr Sahmbi offers
an escape route for criminals, sending them back 200 years.  THe hero,
Darien Lambert (played by Dale Midkiff) is a future cop who goes back
to our time period to round up the good guys.  His companion is a
female computerized hologram.  

Broadcasting suggests that the show sounds like Quantum Leap meets the
Terminator.

My only comment: why does the bad guy have the foreign name and the
good guy the wasp name?  Oh well.
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
From: carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU (Carl J Lydick)
Subject: Re: carrying the torch
Reply-To: carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU
Organization: HST Wide Field/Planetary Camera
Distribution: rec
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 09:26:59 GMT

In article <PH.92Jul27011149@vortex.ama.caltech.edu>, ph@vortex.ama.caltech.edu (Paul Hardy) writes:
>Yes, this is the answer.  I was going to name this puzzle "a flash of
>inspiration" but decided that would be too much of a giveaway.

Given the technique for figuring out which switch was connected to which lamp,
shouldn't you have called it "a flash of perspiration"?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL

Disclaimer:  Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS.  That's what I get paid for.  My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below).  So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it.  If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
From: tolman%asylum.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Kenneth Tolman)
Subject: Re: Ten equals 9.9999....
Date: 28 Jul 92 17:56:13 MDT
Keywords: nine ten repeating digits
Organization: University of Utah, CompSci Dept

In article <5688@osc.COM> Joe Keane <jgk@osc.com> writes:
>In article <1992Jul24.102553.17411@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
>tjoa@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Richard Tjoa) writes:
>>              _
>>            9.9  =  x  (yes, I mean "repeating" with the bar over it.)
>>              _
>>           99.9  =  10x  (multiply by 10)
>>              _
>>         -  9.9  = -  x  (subtract that first thing)
>>          --------------
>>           90    =   9x  (oooh, no more decimal)
>
>I'm afraid you made a mistake in your subtraction.  The problem is that
>99.999... minus 9.9999... is 89.999..., not 90 like you have.

Now, who are we to believe?  What is the TRUE definition of subtraction?

I am not sure how you get 99.99... - 9.99.. = 89.99..

In any event, let us suppose that for the moment, 10 does equal 9.999...
Then by induction, 10 also equals 9.999.....(infinity)...8
Then by induction, 10 also equals 9.999.....(infinity)...7
Then by induction, 10 also equals 9.999.....(infinity)...6

If we follow this through, than 10 = 9.  Then 10 = whatever we want.
That is clearly silly, so I am inclined to agree that 10 != 9.99999....
From: vreddy@husc3.harvard.edu
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
Subject: Re: Proof of -1 = 1
Date: 30 Jul 92 04:45:23 GMT
 <1992Jul29.181115.26903@das.harvard.edu> <Bs60Kv.FuA@well.sf.ca.us>
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

In article <Bs60Kv.FuA@well.sf.ca.us>, yoo@well.sf.ca.us (Young-Kyu Yoo) writes:
> 
>>                               sin x
>>                                _____  = 6
>>                                  n
>>
>>Prove it.
> 
> Spoiler follows...
> 
> 
> The n's cancel leaving you with   si x = 6.

But of course... :) Bravo.

-- Venk --
From: markc@eomer.hw.stratus.com (Mark Christensen)
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
Subject: Re: Cubes
Date: 29 Jul 92 16:33:29 GMT

In article <1992Jul28.173323.11191@alf.uib.no> s290@brems.ii.uib.no ( Per Ivar Roervik) writes:
>
>  As there was no response to my first posting of this puzzle,
>  I will try a last repost ( whispers of thanks will be heard).
>
>  In a nxnxn cube of cubes tightly packed, what is the max number
>  of cubes a straight line can pierce?
>
>  BTW, I would like to see more geometric puzzles in this group,
>  so if somebody is sitting on a good one please post it.  

Off the cuff guess: 2n-1????????????
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
From: s290@brems.ii.uib.no ( Per Ivar Roervik)
Subject: Cubes
Organization: DevNull A/S
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 17:33:23 GMT

  As there was no response to my first posting of this puzzle,
  I will try a last repost ( whispers of thanks will be heard).

  In a nxnxn cube of cubes tightly packed, what is the max number
  of cubes a straight line can pierce?

  BTW, I would like to see more geometric puzzles in this group,
  so if somebody is sitting on a good one please post it.  
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
From: smneyln@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov (Michael Neylon)
Subject: Re: Ten equals 9.9999....
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords: nine ten repeating digits
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 29 Jul 1992 07:18 EST  

In article <1992Jul28.232532.3577@hellgate.utah.edu>, tolman%asylum.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Kenneth Tolman) writes...
>>If two numbers are different, then there's another number between
>>them.  (Actually, a lot of such numbers.)
> 
>>If you can't give an example of a number between 9.99999... and 10,
>>please don't post anymore to this thread.
> 
> 
>SAY WHAT?  This is the silliest bit of nonsense ever.  "If two numbers are
>different, then there's another number between them".  Let's consider the
>integers, and I will give you 2 and 3.  Now, if they are different, there
>must be an integer between them.  Well, what is it?
> 
>Now, if you assert that the above is true for REAL's then you better have
>some reason, for I can just as easily assert the opposite.  As a matter of
>fact, I can show you two numbers which are different, which do not have any
>number between them...
>  41.999999.... and 42
> 
But those ARENT different, they're the same number!   Thats the point of this
whole thread...

Mike Neylon          aka Masem the Great and Almighty Thermo GOD
  // Only the | Univ. of Toledo - Chemical Engineering - Senior
\X/   AMIGA!  |   NASA Lewis Research Center - Summer Intern
\_____________|_____smneyln@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov________________/
       -+ How do YOU spell 'potato'?  How about 'lousy'? +- 
      "Me and Spike are big Malcolm 10 supporters."-J.S.,PLCL
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
From: deghare@daisy.waterloo.edu (Dave Hare)
Subject: Re: Ten equals 9.9999....
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 12:14:25 GMT

In article <1992Jul25.145154.12498@phillip.edu.au> t9114145@phillip.edu.au writes:
>In article <1992Jul24.102553.17411@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>, tjoa@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Richard Tjoa) writes:
>
>> Ok, here's something interesting...
>> 9.9999...  (nine point nine repeating)  =   10  (ten)
>
>There's the error. 9.9999... does not equal 10, it approaches 10.

No, it equals 10.  This type of question has subtleties that too often
are too easily dismissed.  Consider:

    - What exactly is a non-terminating decimal?

    - How will you determine that two numbers are *not* equal

    - If x is a non-terminating decimal, how do you define 10*x?  (Recall
      that for ordinary multiplication, the computation proceeds from 
      least significant digit to most significant digit, but x has no
      least significant digit.)  And how do you define the other arithmetic
      operations?

The problem is that we are cavalierly taught in grade school that if a
non-terminating decimal is periodic, then we just multiply it by 10^{the
period}, subtract the original, divide both sides by 10^{the period}-1
and reduce to lowest terms, and we have that number as an exact rational.

These steps require justification.  HOWEVER, that justification is possible,
and once it is done, then statements such as 9.99999... = 10 make perfect
sense.

Dave Hare
From: miklas@remus.rutgers.edu (Keith Miklas)
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
Subject: retrograde analysis
Date: 28 Jul 92 17:33:23 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

If anyone out there knows of any information concerning retrograde
analysis in chess, please send mail to 

miklas@remus.rutgers.edu

Thank you.
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
From: chepan@gsusgi1.gsu.edu (Parthasarathy Nambi)
Subject: Number of primes with n digits?
Summary: Number of primes with n digits.
Keywords: primes
Organization: Georgia State University
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 15:17:43 GMT

  Hi,

 Is there an easy way to find (a formula perhaps) out
 how many primes are there with say n digits.

 For example there are four primes with one digit (2,3,5 and 7)
 there are 21 primes with two digits etc.

 How about for any n, where n is the number of digits?

 Please post your responses here.          

 P. Nambi

Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
From: karr@cs.cornell.edu (David Karr)
Subject: Re: Ten equals 9.9999....
Keywords: nine ten numbers repeating digits sex
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 15:18:36 GMT

In article <1992Jul24.102553.17411@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> tjoa@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Richard Tjoa) writes:
>9.9999...  (nine point nine repeating)  =   10  (ten)
>How about 1 = 2 later?

Ah, but the first equality is a mathematical truth (provided you
define decimal representation so that you are permitted to write an
infinite string of 9's in the first place (*)), while the second
equality is a falsehood.

So these really are two different topics altogether.

(*) You're depending on a view of decimal fractions which says to get
a decimal number you first throw together any sequence of digits, then
determine what real number that corresponds to.  An alternative view
is that a decimal fraction is defined only as the limit of a
deterministic series of approximations to a certain real number.  Thus
you get .3333... for 1/3, but you always get 1.0000... for 1, never
.9999...

-- David Karr (karr@cs.cornell.edu)
From: water772@Armstrong.EDU (Kelly Waters)
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
Subject: Re: carrying the torch
Date: 27 Jul 92 00:05:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: Armstron.1992Jul27.000523.21323
Distribution: rec
Organization: Armstrong State College, Savannah, GA

In article <PH.92Jul25131320@vortex.ama.caltech.edu> ph@vortex.ama.caltech.edu (Paul Hardy) writes:
>
>>   >3 6 9 27 ?

	are the next values in the sequence 81,207 ?



Kelly Waters

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
favorite nagging question : If I exist, do you? And How about Fred? Or Herman?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: imcc@cs.strath.ac.uk (Iain McCord)
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
Subject: Re: Frog and Turtle play 20
Date: 30 Jul 92 09:51:34 GMT
Organization: Comp. Sci. Dept., Strathclyde Univ., Scotland.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

tolman%asylum.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Kenneth Tolman) writes:

: Frog:  Anything?  Alright, lets go.  It will be impossible for you to get it
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:        now in 20 questions.
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  My guess is Frog thought of the the last sentence.
-- 

		~~~~~/\~~~~~
Iain McCord	~~~~/()\~~~~	Thu Jul 30 10:51:31 WET DST 1992
		~~~~~~~~~~~~