HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: edwong@csa.bu.edu (Edward Wong)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: Win 3.1 incompatibilities, signoff
Date: 7 Apr 92 20:17:20 GMT
Reply-To: edwong@csa.bu.edu
Organization: Boston University
In-reply-to: BATSON@CLEMSON.BITNET's message of 1 Apr 92 14:02:00 GMT

I don't think Norton Desktop 1.0 is completely incompatible with win 3.1.
I am using it with 3.1, and except for the word wraping feature for icon
titles, I have not yet found any compatibility problem.
--
8)
  _               _     | user's name:  Edward Wong
 |_ |\ \   / /\  |_) |\ | ARPA:     edwong@csa.bu.edu	
 |_ |/  \^/ /==\ | \ |/ | UUCP:     csa.bu.edu!edwong	
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Via:      UK.AC.KCL.CC.ASH;  8 APR 92 13:57:50 BST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 13:56:00 GMT
From:         Ian Chivers <UDAA260@ASH.CC.KCL.AC.UK>

BTSOOM      Beats the [stuffing] out of me
BTW         By the way
FWIW        For what it's worth
FYI         For Your Information
GR&D        Grinning running & ducking
IAE         In any event
IANAL       I Am Not A Lawyer, also IANAxxx such as CPA
IMO         In my opinion
IMHO        In my humble opinion
IMCO        In my considered opinion
IOW         In other words
NFW         No [bleeping] way
NRN         No Reply Necessary
OTOH        On the other hand
PITA        Pain in the [...]
ROF,L       Rolling on floor, laughing.
RSN         Real Soon Now [which may be a long time coming]
RTFM        Read the [fine] manual (or message)
SITD        Still in the dark
TANSTAAFL   There Ain't No Such Than A Free Lunch
TIA         Thanks In Advance
TIC         Tongue in cheek
TLA         Three Letter Acronym (such as this)
SNAFU       Situation Normal, All F_____ Up
FUBAR       F_____ Up Beyond All Recognition


Taken from a SAS discussion list.

ian chivers
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 11:29:57 PST
From:         Mark Rogers <RSPMRO@LLUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Opening Screen
              9 Apr 1992 18:48:04 +0300 from <KARGRA@GBA930.ZAMG.AC.AT>

On Thu, 9 Apr 1992 18:48:04 +0300 <KARGRA@GBA930.ZAMG.AC.AT> said:
>Now I do have a serious question:
>I assume that win 31 has again an opening screen probably with WINDOWS 3.1 on
>it
>Did microsoft manage to make it easier to change this screen to your own logo,
>or will we have to modify win.com once again? After I found finally a program
>to create RLE-files, will it still be useful to change the MS-logo?
>And how many redundant programs will we receive this time?
>If anybody would post it to the list, maybe some more users will benefit from
>knowing what is coming upon them.
>
They must have done something different, I used to use ELANA.EXE to change that
, now when I did it, Windows crashed upon startup.

TTYL...Mark
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 22:28:30 CDT
From:         Brian McGraw <DMCGRAW1@UA1VM.BITNET>
Subject:      3.1 Upgrade (tired of it yet???? : )

Well, 3.1 finally arrived today from MicroWarehouse (C'mon, Egghead - I'm
still waiting for NDW.  : )

Anyways, I consider this to be kind of trivial, but it's been bugging the
heck out of me today.  Seems that I saw someone else mention earlier this
week about a hologram that can with the new 3.1.  I didn't get one, and
I was wondering how concerned I should be.

Thanks for any answers.
----------
Please do not read this tagline.
----------
|=------=|=-------------------------------------------------------=|
| Brian  | DMcGraw1@UA1VM.Bitnet        The University of Alabama  |
| McGraw | Roooooooooooooooooooooooooooolllllllllllllllllll Tide!  |
|=------=|=-------------------------------------------------------=|
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 10:33:52 BST
From:         Derek Jones <derek@AIVRU.SHEF.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: 3.1 *AND* 3.0 on same machine
X-cc:         derek@uknet.ac.uk

Two further thoughts -

1.) anybody have a list of software that's buggy with
3.1 (or doesn't run at all)?

I'm thinking of QEMM 6.0, Ami Pro 2.0, NDW, etc...

2.) How *big* is a *full* 3.1 installation for a 386?

thanks again.

regards

Derek Jones.

System Manager.
A.I. Vision Research Unit, Sheffield University, Western Bank,
Sheffield.  S10 2TN. U.K.
Tel: (+44) (0)742 768555 X 6551  	email:  derek@aivru.sheffield.ac.uk
FAX: (+44) (0)742 766515
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL0]
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 17 Apr 1992 09:21:01 WST
From:         mfreid@HKUXA.HKU.HK
Subject:      RE: New Smartdrv and Stacker

Thanks to Paul Kierstead for his reply about stacker.
I turned ON caching of my stacker partition (D:), and this seems to
dramatically improve things. I'll check out the details in the
readme file (I deleted it off this computer), but I'm sure you're correct.
I've left it on for C:, where my swapfile it. Don't see any reason
why I should not cache that.

To Andy Meyers point:
It is true that my D: is just a big file on C:, but since with the
new smartdrv you have to load stacker *first*, stacker intercepts any
calls to drive D:. You can easily check this by repeatedly doing
DIR D:
If the disk cache is operational the light will not flash after the first
one. You can also look at the "hit rate" with smartdrv /s.

--
Mike Reid
mfreid@hkuxa.hku.hk <-- Preferred Internet Address [or mfreid@hkucc.bitnet]
Department of Physics, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Rd, HONG KONG
Phone: (852) 859 7944 or 859 2360 Fax: (852) 559 9152 Telex: 71919 CEREB HX
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 11:38:00 CST
From:         576TESTSTEHA <576TESTSTEHA@SACEMNET.HQSAC.AF.MIL>
Subject: RE: Smartdrv
X-To:         win3-l <win3-l@uicvm.uic.edu>

>Has anyone tested the smartdrv 4.0?  Is it better than pc-cache or
>ncache?

I own Norton utilities version 6.0 and have been happily using NCACHE for quit
sometime.  According to an article in PC Magazine "Microsoft reports that
SMARTDRV outperforms all caches on the market and should replace them all."

I ran Norton's hard drive benchmark from version 6.0 and came up with the
following results:

	NCACHE		Overall 8.1	Average seek 13.19 msec
	SMARTDRV	Overall 8.2	Average seek 12.86 msec

SMARTDRV now has a write cache as well as a read cache.  I have decided to
leave SMARTDRV installed on my system and it seems to perform well.  I also
noticed that it automatically loads itself in high memory.

Adam Borin	INTERNET:  576teststeha@sacemnet.hqsac.af.mil
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 09:56:09 -0500
From:         Alan Cunningham <cunnida@TENET.EDU>
Subject:      Re: cc:Mail and Win 3.1

On Tue, 14 Apr 1992, Antti Peltonen wrote:
> We have here cc:Mail system and mainly we use Windows
> "workstations" and cc:Mail for Win (ver 1.1).

We are cc:Mail users and the vendor advised their version 1.1 does not
work with Windows 3.1.  We are awaiting a new version...no timeframe given
by the vendor.  We had problems similar to yours.

[I tried replying to you directly and the message was rejected.
===============
D. Alan Cunningham, Technical Program Manager, NASA Spacelink
Boeing Computer Support Services at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center
Email:  cunnida@tenet.edu     Phone:205-544-3091     Fax:205-544-2362
NASA Spacelink  Modems:205-895-0028  Internet:spacelink.msfc.nasa.gov
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X400-Trace: AT*PTT*ZAMET; arrival Mon, 6 Apr 92 14:23:30 +0300 action Relayed
P1-Message-ID: AT*PTT*ZAMET; 920406141439016-GBA930
UA-Content-ID: 920406141439016-
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 14:23:30 +0300
From:         KARGRA@GBA930.ZAMG.AC.AT
Subject:      Reply to SmartDrv AND SWAPFile
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@helios.BITNET

>
>RFC-822-HEADERS:
>Return-Path: <@HELIOS.EDVZ.UNIVIE.AC.AT:WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET>
>Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 12:16:57 CET
>Sender:       Microsoft Windows Version 3 Forum <WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET>
>I currently run Windows 3.0 in enhanced mode on my 386SX with 2Mb RAM.
>I have set up the system to use a permanent swapfile of maximum 3Mb, and
>also specify the device driver SMARTDRV.SYS with parameter 768 in my config.
>My question is: Will SMARTDRV load frequently used data FROM my hard disk and
>INTO virtual memory, thereby just moving my data around my hard disk and make
>my system bite it's own tail?
>
>Yours, Morten.

Dear Morten.
I fear, you are confusing something. SWAPFILE creates a permanent file on your
HD in order to keep a contiguos space. Otherwise the swapfile might be scattered
all over the drive and slow down the swapping process unnecessarily.
Smartdrive is a softwarecache. The data stored in the cache are those, that will
be used next. In the worst case, smartdrive will read ahead the data from your
swapfile. But you can't stop it doing this, because it would read the data any-
way, just to have the data when it is needed allready in memory. So this config.
will not slow down your system, but increase its speed. Smartdrive can read
ahead faster and with a better hitrate - due to the existence of your swapfile.

Sincerely, ALFRED :)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 14:04:00 EDT
From:         Michael Gordon <GORDONM@DENISON.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: [dhosfor@ATL.CALSTATE.EDU: Win 3.1 upgrade]

>
>There are new Trident drivers for Windows 3.1. Labeled as Rel 1.0
>BETA Mar 92. Since cica is down I don't have any place to put them.
>
        They are available at the SIMTEL mirror @ Washington University under
pub/MSDOS as something along the order of TRIDENT_WIN31.ZIP.

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  14-APR-1992 14:04:53
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 10:34:13 -0600
From:         Bill Ferguson <AXIBILF@UICVMC.BITNET>
Subject:      Dell Windows Users

 Can any Dell Windows users out there tell me if the 20,000,000 bytes of
 #####.IMG files that were resident on my hard drive under Dell\Images when I
 "inherited" my system are still needed? Sorry for such a novice question... By
 the way, I haven't received my 3.1 update yet either. Bill Ferguson University
 of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Xref: sparky bit.listserv.win3-l:3610 misc.forsale.computers:16883 comp.os.msdos.misc:3059
From: rfs0838@summa.tamu.edu (SCHAFFTER, RODNEY FRANK, JR)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l,misc.forsale.computers,comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: An incredible deal
Date: 7 Apr 92 14:53:00 GMT
Followup-To: bit.listserv.win3-l
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <rrb1sINN5mg@kitty.ksu.ksu.edu>, sdoran@kitty.ksu.ksu.edu (Steven Marcotte) writes...

>If that was an add in a magazine, wouldn't the post office have something
>to say?  Something like mail fraud or something like that?

	If you read the magazine you will see that is an April Fools' joke.
You are supposed to show this ad to a friend right after they purchase
their new system.  With prices droping so fast, you can almost show him a
real ad to get a rise out of him-I can now buy a 486-33 for what I paid
for my 386-sx last year.:(:(:(

Rod Schaffter                                 	
Laboratory for Molecular Structure and Bonding	|Who cares if windows is or 
Texas A&M University Dept. of Chemistry		|isn't an opperating system-
Bitnet:   SCHAFFTER@TAMLMSB			|it barely operates at all!
INTERNET: SCHAFFTER@LMSBVX.TAMU.EDU		|
	"Standard Disclaimer, etc."		|An OOPerating system, maybe?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: win3-l@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"win3-l@uicvm.bitnet"
X-VMS-Cc: BUMGARNK
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 17 Apr 1992 09:28:00 EST
From:         Keith R Bumgarner <BUMGARNK@UNCG.BITNET>
Subject:      Win3.1 problems?

I have been having some problems with Win3.1, CorelDRAW!, and WP4Win.

I am printing to an HP LaserJet IIIP w/3Mb RAM and it is connected to my PC
directly.  I am using the Win 3.1 provided printer driver with the TrueType
FontPack.

In Corel, when I print, I get all graphics objects, but no Text box objects.
and sometimes when I am trying to print large letter sizes, only a few of the
characters print.  I got the updated SCODL.COM from Compu$erve and installed
the new files per the directions provided but to no avail.  In the TrueType
dialog, I have enable the TT fonts, but have not told it to use TT exclusively.

In WP4Win, oftentimes when I print, I get a General Protection fault in my
WPWINFIL.EXE (?)  And the OS requests that the Application quit.

Before 3.1 printing was a breeze and I had no problems.

Has anyone had similar problems, or know any fixes?

Also, I got my Diamond Stealth VRAM about 2 weeks ago, and am nothing short
of impressed!  I am expecting a copy of the Win3.1 drivers from Diamond
soon.  You can call them and they will send a copy (408)736-2000.  If someone
will be so kind as to tell me how to upload to one of the FTP servers, I can
do that when I get them.

AtDhVaAnNkCsE

(thanks in ADVANCE)

Keith Bumgarner, Instructional and Research Computing
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro
BUMGARNK@UNCG.BITNET
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 16:13:59 E02
From:         Juergen Kreuels <CRH001@DJUKFA11.BITNET>
Subject:      WIN 3.1

hello
I just saw the message that Waldensoft is selling Win 3.1 for $39.95 .
A question to that. Do you have to take the original Win 3.0 disks
with you to the store or is it done like DOS 5.0 that everybody can
get the updates without handing disks back? Please post to the list
due to the fact that we have problems on our site with direct mail
( server gateway changed ).

Many thanks in advance.
Regards
Juergen Kreuels
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.2 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 11:25:47 EST
From:         SMITH.H@FS.JSCHOOL.WLU.EDU
Subject:      Re: Windows 3.1 upgrade
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

the 3.5 disks are mostly HD; one is stnd, I think.  about 5 or 6
disks sent for 3.1 upgrade

==================================================
                     Ham Smith
Hampden H. Smith III
Professor and Head
Department of Journalism and Mass Communications
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, Va.  24450
703-463-8434
Smith.h@fs.jschool.wlu.edu
==================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 16:07:14 MDT
From:         Manabu Asano <asano@XI.ULETH.CA>
Subject:      Re: Mouse Problems
X-To:         win3-l@uicvm.uic.edu

I too have the mouse problem.  I have logitech mouse (I think the
newestr kind) and the mouse driver is the one supplied in win 3.1
(ver.6.20).  The mouse pointer jumps around suddenly without any
reasons...  The getting startted manual says it is the interrupt
confilicts.  But what I have in my config.sys is HIMEM, EMM386, ANSI,
STACKER.  Does anybody has idea?

asano@hg.uleth.ca
Xref: sparky bit.listserv.win3-l:3544 misc.forsale.computers:16779 comp.os.msdos.misc:3030
From: crb2@Ra.MsState.Edu (Chad R. Berthelson)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l,misc.forsale.computers,comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: An incredible deal
Date: 6 Apr 92 00:22:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: Ra.crb2.702519753
Organization: Mississippi State University

For the ones of you that don't get (read) PC/Computing  This was a bogus
ad printed as the bottom half of an article by Penn (of Penn and Teller).
You were supposed to cut it out (looked very authentic) and give it to an enemy
that had just bought something big, or was just a snob.  The number should
get a recording of Penn blasting the 'idiot' for trying.  It was for April
Fools Day.

Just letting you know.
Chad
.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <M14051@mwvm.mitre.org>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 10:29:01 EDT
From:         John DeCarlo <m14051@MWVM.MITRE.ORG>
Subject:      Reply to "Re: Pigged off Microsoft User!" (04/09/92 10:22:47)
X-To:         win3-l%uicvm.bitnet%uga.cc.uga.edu@mwunix.mitre.org

Just another data point.  One of the technical support people I work with
went to FOSE in Washington, DC to check out Mac, Windows, OS/2, etc. stuff.
His general impression as a rule is that you need to overpower your computer
to get it to run a GUI as smoothly as the Mac.  However, he was very
impressed with OS/2 2.0, since they were demonstrating it on a 386SX (20MHz)
and it was doing quite nicely (he assumed they would demo on a 486).

Internet: jdecarlo@mitre.org (or John.DeCarlo@f131.n109.z1.fidonet.org)
Fidonet:  1:109/131
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 13:43:00 EDT
From:         ERIC WEBB <EWZ@NCCIBM1.BITNET>
Subject:      New OS/2 Sister List

>                                                 Moreover, frankly, the
> OS/2 list is nearly dead to the world... last time I logged on & read
> it it was mostly full of IBM and Microsoft programmers and ex-IBM &
> ex-Microsoft programmes bitching at one another concerning who had the
> better OS and beta code for the next version :-(.

Diego,
  I assume you refer to the moderated OS/2 list. I agree that the list
has degenerated into dueling egos. The only thing worse than ugly GUI
wars is ugly code wars. Who gives a dang who wrote which piece of HPFS!

  There is a new non-moderated list for OS/2 and applications. I only
mention it for those who might run Windows apps under OS/2. The list
seems to be void of the "No, I'm the Master of the Universe and Defender
of the One True Faith" types. To subscibe send a "SUB OS2-L your name" to
LISTSERV@FRORS12.BITNET.

Regards,
Eric Webb
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 15:30:00 CDT
From:         "Wile E. Coyote" <BBHULSEY@UAMS.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Mouse Problems

Mark Mason writes:

>I am having problems in Win 3.1 (Win 3.0 as well) with my mouse
>"jumping around."  It kinda reminds me of that Asteroids game
>when you hit the hyperspace key -- your little space ship disapears
>and instantly reappears at a random location on the screen.  That
>is exactly what my mouse cursor is doing.  I have the following
>interesting configuration parameters:

>       DOS 5.0
>       Mouse Driver from Win 3.1  (LOADED LOW)
>       3 com ports (1-3, all with seperate interrupts and base i/o)
>       stacker 2.0
>       QEMM
>       etc, etc,

>Anyone got any ideas?

What kind of mouse are you using?  And what software is _running_ when this
happens?

.......
:  o/ : Bruce Hulsey
: <|  : Univ. of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
: / > : internet: bbhulsey@life.uams.edu
:.....: bitnet:   bbhulsey@uams
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 11:07:00 EDT
From:         Vince Scarafino <Scarafino@MULTICS-A.PMS.FORD.COM>
Subject:      Re: Windows 3.0 won't run.
X-To:         Microsoft Windows Version 3 Forum
              <WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>

 >Date:  15 April 1992 10:47 edt
 >From:  Michael Gordon <GORDONM%DENISON.BITNET at UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
 >Subject:  Re: Windows 3.0 won't run.

 >>
 >>I operate a Quattro Prompt 386-sx Pc with 2Mb ram and a 40Mb hard
 >>drive.Dos 5.0 is my operating system.The problem is that Windows 3.0
 >>won't run;it begins to run and a sort of title screen appears then
 >>however it returns to the dos prompt without displaying any error
 >>message. Could anyone shed some light on what is wrong and tell me how
 >>to remedy it.I've already reinstalled windows three times but to no
 >>avail.
 >
 >        Try increasing the FILES= statement in your autoexec.bat; the problem
 >you're describing often comes about if not enough FILES are loaded.
 >
 >Michael D. Gordon
 >gordonM@cc.denison.edu
 >Date sent:  15-APR-1992 10:47:02

I believe he means config.sys, not autoexec.bat.

Vince
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  WIN3
Original_cc:  REITSMAC
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 12:00:00 EDT
From:         Michael Gordon <GORDONM@DENISON.BITNET>
Subject:      3.1 for $39

MicroWarehouse today lowered its price on the 3.1 upgrade bundle to $39.

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  6-APR-1992 12:00:34
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 07:30:00 EST
From:         Michael Gordon <GORDONM@DENISON.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: wfw2.0 vs. wfw2.0a?

>
>I've noticed something that wfw2.0 does that I _hope_ is fixed in 2.0a,
>but since I don't have that yet, I don't know.  When I type and edit,
>I use draft mode.  Even on my 386/33, it's enough faster that I like it
>that way.  Unfortunately, whenever I use the Print Preview funtion, it
>undoes the Draft switch.  Is this a "bug" or a "feature"--or, God
>forbid, have I just missed something obvious?  (I'll expect a good
>severalness of RTFMs if so).  I'm using 3.1, but this happened under 3.0,
>too.  It's kind of irritating.  Any ideas? (outside of programming a macro to
>go into print preview and restore draft mode on the way out).
>-chet
>
        The "undoing" of the draft switch was there in 1.0, 1.2, 2.0, 2.0, and
2.0a; so I guess it's a "feature" and I agree it's annoying....

Michael D. Gordon
gordonM@cc.denison.edu
Date sent:  13-APR-1992 07:30:24
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  JNET%"win3-l@uicvm.bitnet"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 09:25:00 EST
From:         JREDMON@GMUVAX.BITNET
Subject:      XGA and Windows 3.1

During installation of 3.1 my system started Windows but then returned to
the C prompt.  Has anyone else had this problem.  It happened to myself as
well as 2 others with XGA.  Also which XGA do we choose? (XGA with large
fonts?)

John Redmon
George Mason University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mailer: Elm [revision: 66.25]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 17:27:54 PDT
From:         b0506007@HP850S.NTU.EDU.TW
Subject:      Re: TELNET HOST for DOS
X-To:         Microsoft Windows Version 3 Forum
              <WIN3-L%UICVM.bitnet@TWNMOE10.EDU.TW>

> |Subj: TELNET HOST for DOS
> |In-Reply-To: Message from $WIN3-L@UICVM:BITNET of 3-30-92
> act as a TELNET Host.  I have FTP's product that allows you act as an
> FTP server but as far as I know they have no TELNET server program.
>
Hello,
	Could you tell me where can I get the FTP programs for DOS ?

	Thanks a lot !

Best regards ,
Drifter Chen
b0506007@hp850s.ntu.edu.tw