HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. Schechner)
Subject: Re: Best 'Murphy Brown Quote'
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 00:28:00 GMT


>Personally, I think it would be more appropriate to name a large
>crater after Dan. :)

	Seconded!

>Tom Warner

-Jason

-- 
"Down here on the planet Earth 
They steal your back and leave the shirt.
Pay you a penny and call it a dime and then   -Jason and
Give you a watch when you run out of time."   -the Scorchers 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: hallam@zeus02.desy.de (Phill Hallam-Baker)
Subject: Re: The debate is on?????
Reply-To: Hallam@zeus02.desy.de
Organization: Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron, Experiment ZEUS bei HERA
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 00:19:47 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.114420.8722@keps.kodak.com>, Susan Klimowicz writes:

|>How interesting.  Bush will debate Clinton but only on certain days, three of
|>which the World Series already lay claim to and the fourth is oh so close to
|>election day.  I wonder which day it will be?  I wonder what Bush has up his
|>sleeve. He is so convinced that he will win the election I have to wonder....
|>Is he really that stupid or does he have a "bomb dropping" planned? 

So convinced he will win? Nope he is convinced that if his record ever gets put
under scrutiny he will lose.

--

Phill Hallam-Baker
From: sham@cs.arizona.edu (Shamim Zvonko Mohamed)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Mary Tyler Moore: ahead of its time
Date: 1 Oct 92 17:51:11 GMT
Organization: U of Arizona, CS Dept, Tucson

Seen on MTM reruns last night: a certain person is described --

"Was he for or against it?"

"Well, we don't know! He just stood there, with his mouth open like he was going
to say something, and then a sort of glaze came over his eyes, he giggled a
couple of times, said something nobody understood, then he asked if there were
any more questions!"

Exact description of the famous Danne analysis of a recent Supreme Court decision.

-s
-- 
  Shamim Mohamed / {uunet,noao,cmcl2..}!arizona!shamim / shamim@cs.arizona.edu

  "Take this cross and garlic; here's a Mezuzah if he's Jewish; a page of the
    Koran if he's a Muslim; and if he's a Zen Buddhist, you're on your own."
 Member of the League for Programming Freedom - write to league@prep.ai.mit.edu
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The Last Word on "Potatoe".
Date: 6 Oct 92 16:26:49 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <mjenkins.718381299@cunews> mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson) writes:
>In <1992Oct6.232817.1@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz> hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Anthony 'SCHWAibo' Hobbs) writes:
>
>>> Yes, there is a big difference.  In the one case, there was a man who
>>> had been given the incorrect spelling on a card; in the other case, there
>>> was a published report, presumably with spelling checks and proofreaders.
>>> 
>>> Which one is more excusable?
>
>>Being given the wrong spelling doesn't excuse the man. If he was firing on all
>>cylinders, he would have noticed that the spelling was *wrong*. WHY DIDN'T HE?
>
>>Answer: he is DIM. Seriously DIM.
>
>Then he is just as dim as all the people at the Globe & Mail and in
>the Canadian federal government who spelled words wrong too!
>
>I think I proved my point here. It doesn't matter who makes what
>mistakes where...if Dan Quayle does it, its further proof he's such an
>idiot. No matter the media makes the same mistakes he does, they're
>excused, he's an idiot. No matter the Canadian government made the
>*exact* same mistake he did, they're excused, he's an idiot.
>
>Bah.
>
>Michael

*sigh*  Are we excusing newspapers for goofs?  No.  We are 
putting the errors in context, namely:

(1)  The Globe & Mail editors deal with thouands of words;
Our Boy only had to deal with one, and blew it.
(2)  The humor was NOT in the fact that DQ misspelled a word;
the humor (to us) was that he was "correcting" a young sprout
who knew the right spelling of "potato".
(3)  This is only a small, perhaps trivial, example from
DQ's huge compendium of logical falacies, factual blunders,
and grammatical goofs.  For other public figures, the "potatoe"
incident would be mildly amusing, but have no great significance;
for the Dandroid, this is another bit of evidence of his
truly awesome incompetence.
(4)  This moron is only one heartbeat from the most powerful
political office in the world.  If we don't laugh, we scream.

It's fine with us if this is REALLY the last word on "potatoe".
But if any other apologists for the Revealed Wisdom of Dan
wish to concoct more rationalizations for "potatoe",
bring 'em here!

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: dks@MIT.EDU (dks)
Subject: Re: Neil "Welfare Queen" Bush
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 12:35:04 EST
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA20706; Sun, 27 Sep 92 10:24:09 -0700
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA11479; Sun, 27 Sep 92 10:24:08 -0700
X-Received: from TMS-E19-PORT-5.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTPid AA13268; Sun, 27 Sep 92 13:23:58 EDT
X-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle.usenet
X-Command: Send_AEvt(doAutoForward)


rjv@a2.cim.cdc.com (Rene Valdes) writes about the adventures of Neil Bush:
> We should all be up in arms.  We should write to our representatives
> in Washington and demand a thorough investigation!

Just do it.


Dhanesh

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: I didnt think it was possible (re-post from talk.bizarre)
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 12:58:37 GMT

> jcarroll@ferris.cray.com gushes:

>
>All right. If my Republican credentials measure up, will you shut up?
>Since I reached voting age in 1978, I have voted for two Republican
>presidents. I subscribed to National Review for at least five years.
>I voted for two Republican governors of Indiana, and against a Democratic
>governor of Washington. I have voted for J. Danforth Quayle four times.
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>I voted a straight Republican ticket in 1984.
>


ABSO-FUCKIN-LUTELY AMAZING!@! FOUR times! I think we know who's been having
the illicit affairs with marilyn q. now......

>>I didn't think that this thread was funny in the first place,

it wasnt, until you BRAGGED about voting for Quayle FOUR times.

-rob, so this is why i dont killfile republicans.....
From: llama@pooh.cc.utexas.edu (sine nomine)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Marylin says something REEEEEEAAAAAAALLLLL stupid
Date: 29 Sep 92 17:21:10 GMT
Distribution: na
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

John Switzer (jrs@netcom.com) wrote:

: Uh, maybe you should take a health class or something? There are several
: after-intercourse prophylactics available - spermicides, for example, or 
: morning-after pills and RU486. 

spermicides are useless when administered after intercourse, for the
same reason that postcoital acidic douches don't work for birth
control: at least some sperm will already be out of range by the time
you could administer these.

ru-486 is not available in this country and is violently opposed by
the right-to-lifers. theoretically, anyway, the repubs are r-t-l.

morning-after pills are basically just high doses of female hormones
(they can be somewhat emulated by taking several birth-control pills)
and aren't guaranteed effective.

: Marilyn was probably saying that doctors,
: cops, clinics, and anyone else involved with helping the rape victim 
: should be aware of these options and make sure that they are offered 
: as soon as possible.

except there aren't all that many options available. and a
morning-after pill prevents implantation of a fertilized egg. if teh
repubs believe tht life begins at conception, then using that pill
would be the same thing as abortion.
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: debates
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 92 20:00:04 CDT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:

> In article <3ec6RB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> elendil@mintir.new-orleans
> >cass8806@elan.glassboro.edu (KYLE CASSIDY) writes:
> >
> >> i can barely wait to see our boy dan take on al gore in the debate.
> >>
> >> any thoughts on who might win?
> >
> >That's already been decided.  I'll be interested to see if Our Boy actually
> >breaks from his well-rehearsed, scripted lines and comes up with an original
> >thought.
>
> What if that thought concerned his 7-Iron?
>
>

then there's even the possibility that it will be a *coherent* thought <g>.



|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: Re: Don't cry for me, Argentina
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 13:59:30 GMT

Tom Warner writes:

>pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh) writes:
  .
  .
  .
  (rambling, fragmented Quayle Quote deleted)
  .
  .
  .
>>Something peculiar about this quote has been nagging at me ever since.  I
>>usually expect Dan to simply say inane things.  But this quote is different
>>because I'm still trying to figure out just WHAT it is that he's said here!
>>The rambling, incoherent sentences make this difficult.  This morning I
>>think I finally figured out what's strange about this quote:  this isn't
>>Quayle speaking Quaylespeak, this is Quayle speaking Bushspeak!

>I was in a pizza place today where they hang the day's papers on the walls
>in front of where you sit to eat, reading the latest NYT story on Bush's
>denial of knowing what was going on with Iran-Contra. The article had a sidebar
>with a whole bunch of Bush quotes, listed chronologically, about what he knew.
>And what struck me was how hard it was to decipher just what the hell he was
>saying. At first I thought the NYT might have flubbed its copy-editing. But
>the garbled english was in almost every quote. Then the guy sitting next to
>me pointed out what should have been obvious to me -- he said, "I think
>he does that on purpose, so that no matter what you interpret him as saying,
>he can say he didn't say that, and you took him out of context."

>So was it purely by chance that Quayle fumbled out a Bushism,
>or is Quayle finally learning a job skill?

Well, I tend to think GHWB (not to mention Dan!) is just plain incoherent...
on the other hand, I certainly wouldn't put anything past him, including what
you're suggesting.  In either case, maybe Dan's smarter than we give him
credit for; after all, this quote shows signs of bilingualism!  :-)

(By the way, I don't suppose the pizza joint had the Nitty Ditty Nitty Gritty
 Great Bird playing, by any chance?  :-))

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: dks@MIT.EDU (dks)
Subject: Getting a job
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 11:49:27 EST
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA20474; Sun, 27 Sep 92 10:22:46 -0700
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA11381; Sun, 27 Sep 92 10:22:44 -0700
X-Received: from TMS-E19-PORT-5.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTPid AA13247; Sun, 27 Sep 92 13:22:33 EDT
X-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle.usenet
X-Command: Send_AEvt(doAutoForward)


In article <1992Sep22.182847.7119@galileo.physics.arizona.edu>,
Ted Krueger writes against the Family and Medical Leave Act:
>
>      [Quayl-free content deleted]
>
> "Vote Democrat.  It's easier than getting a job."


Right.  Getting a job is pretty difficult these days.



Dhanesh

  Newcomers to the group will not realize it, but September 22
  marked an historic occasion: the long-awaited return of the
  original Krueger Kid to a.f.d.-q. after a very long absence.

Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:4693 alt.politics.clinton:7657 alt.politics.bush:7062 alt.politics.marrou:1344 alt.politics.perot:1652 alt.alt:97 alt.mcdonalds.cheese:2
From: kaszeta@eecae.ee.msu.edu (Richard Kaszeta)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.marrou,alt.politics.perot,alt.alt,alt.mcdonalds.cheese,alt.abortion.moderated
Subject: Re: Help out!
Date: 29 Sep 92 12:35:17 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University

tcws@convex1.tcs.tulane.edu (Bill Sirinek) writes:

>If you want to learn how you can contribute money, or where you can go to volunteer for the campaign of who will be our country's next President:

What, send him some McCheese?
From: schenn@mars.lerc.nasa.gov (Lisa Henn)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Outlaw Fire NOW!!!!
Date: 30 Sep 92 18:35:00 GMT
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Sep29.144741.19379@pwcs.stpaul.gov>, chrisl@stpaul.gov (Chris A Lyman) writes...
>drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:

>> Robert Thank you for clarifying that we CLEARLY
>> have a NEED to outlaw FIRE as it is DANGEROUS!!!!

>You know that I would be untrue,
>You know that I would be a liar,
>If I was to say to you,
>Girl, we couldn't get much higher.


      --The Doors, of course


You know that I would be untrue,
You know that I would be a liar,
If I did not say to you
That I set your Dad on fire.

      --The Dead Milkmen 


>           "Remember! Arguments should be FUN!" -- Jessica McGeary


L 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann)
Subject: George's Big Boner (Was Re: Bruce Herschensohn (Was: Re: Casey 1996! (Was Re: It's just a TV SHOW!)))
Organization: Society For Putting Things on Top of Other Things
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 03:08:45 GMT

In article <mlbruce.718410646@husc11> mlbruce@husc11.harvard.edu (Matthew Bruce) writes:
>coolidge@speaker.wpd.sgi.com (Don Coolidge) writes:

>>He's a much better speaker than economist. He's an excellent example of the
>>hissing viper school of oratory. Not to mention that he likes to take credit
>>for things he's opposed, if they finally go through and succeed. I suppose
>>that makes him suitable Presidential timber, given King George's propensity
>>to do the same...
>
>You're slightly off on that point. George's major sin is, after he opposes
>what should be opposed, he betrays us by allowing it to "succeed" in its
>metamorhpisis from bad bill to bad law.

For SHAME!  You post your opinion on George's major sin to 

    alt.fan.dan-quayle

without even considering, that in reality George's major sin is:

    Vice-President Dan Quayle.

For George's other major sins, these others far outweigh your charge
of accomodation:

    Hypocracy--we remember when he was "Rubbers" Bush, the Family Planning
                 Mavin, and called Reagan's economics the deep voodoo it was
    Lying------He *knows* Clinton didn't raise taxes 128 times, but he loves
                 to keep saying it anyway.
    Corruption-Tell me with a straight face he had no involvement in
                 Iran-Contra; didn't make illegal payments to Noriega;
                 didn't encourage money to Saddam Hussein despite all
                 the CIA's warnings against it...
    Nepotism---Or, why isn't Neil Bush rotting in jail for Silverado?
    Demagoguery--I know this is too many syllables for most of Rushie-poohs
                   fans to handle, but there is no better word for the RNC
                   Family Values hatefest.

But, most important of all, George's biggest sin was, is, and will 
always be

     J. Danforth Quayle, Vice-President of the United States.

-- 
Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer.  Take your pick.

Centigram Communications Corp, San Jose California  408/428-3553
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: coolidge@speaker.wpd.sgi.com (Don Coolidge)
Subject: Re: Bumperstickers (Was: Mr. Casual Sex)
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 92 18:34:11 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.234914.10964@netcom.com>, madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann) writes:
|> In article <D2150056.f0ul4c@erics.infoserv.com> erics@infoserv.com writes:
|> >
|> >I've seen two Bush bumperstickers in the Bay Area. One was in support
|> >of Bush/Quayle, the other said simply: BUllSHit.
|> 
|> I saw another Bush bumpersticker up at Tomales Bay a couple of weekends
|> ago, but I didn't think it counted in favor of the Shrub and Our Boy.
|> 
|> It said:   PRESIDENT BUSH.  NOT.

Well, it's not a bumper sticker, but I did see a dandy campaign button
yesterday. It had a reproduction of Munch's (I hope I'm remembering the
artist's name correctly) famous etching, "The Scream". The only words
to be found on it were "President Quayle"

LOVED it!

:^)

- Don Coolidge
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: plu@math.psu.edu (Todd Andrew Simpson)
Subject: Re: A Rush By Any Other Name
Organization: Department of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University
	<mlbruce.718410646@husc11> <1992Oct7.000025.21452@u.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 00:59:06 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.000025.21452@u.washington.edu> sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) writes:

   In article <mlbruce.718410646@husc11> mlbruce@husc11.harvard.edu (Matthew Bruce) writes:
   >May add another voice to the too many already here? I wish you could do better
   >than simple name-calling in voicing your objections to Rush. Anyway,
   >didn't it used to be just "Rush Slimeball", or do you all just hold a
   >name-calling contest every so often?

   Good Idea!

   Choose one from Column A, one from Column B:

   Column A
   --------
   Rush
   Retch
   Rust
   Rash

   Column B
   --------
   Lymphnode
   Limpbone
   Lameboy
   Lintbarf

   These are all I can remember now.  More suggestions welcomed;
   nay, demanded!

When my brother used to listen to Rush (he always listened because, he
said, he just couldn't believe what a lowlife Rush was), the way he said
the guy's name it sounded like `Rush Limbo'.  I think it says something
about where he (I mean, Rush Limbaugh) is coming from.

   Thanks for your helpful suggestion.

   -- 
   | Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
   | U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |

- Todd Andrew Simpson

``The Space People will contact us when they
can make money by doing so.''
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: tcws@convex1.tcs.tulane.edu (Bill Sirinek)
Subject: Re: Outlaw Fire NOW!!!!
Organization: Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 21:06:12 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host-[nntpd-11612]: convex1.tcs.tulane.edu

In article <30SEP199214354323@mars.lerc.nasa.gov> schenn@mars.lerc.nasa.gov (Lisa Henn) writes:
>In article <1992Sep29.144741.19379@pwcs.stpaul.gov>, chrisl@stpaul.gov (Chris A Lyman) writes...
>>drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>
>>> Robert Thank you for clarifying that we CLEARLY
>>> have a NEED to outlaw FIRE as it is DANGEROUS!!!!
>
>>You know that I would be untrue,
>>You know that I would be a liar,
>>If I was to say to you,
>>Girl, we couldn't get much higher.
>
>
>      --The Doors, of course
>
>
>You know that I would be untrue,
>You know that I would be a liar,
>If I did not say to you
>That I set your Dad on fire.
>
>      --The Dead Milkmen 
>
I got somethin' to say...
I killed your baby today...
Doesnt matter much to me...
As long as its dead...

       --Metallica


--
| Bill Sirinek                     Snail: Box 3799, Tulane University     |
| Computer Science Major                  New Orleans, LA 70118           |
| Tulane University               BITNET: tcws000@tcsmusa                 |
| New Orleans, Louisiana        Internet: tcws@convex1.tcs.tulane.edu     |
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: dks@MIT.EDU (dks)
Subject: Re: Quayle is a Nazi
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 92 15:13:24 EST
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA28654; Tue, 6 Oct 92 12:52:04 -0700
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA09595; Tue, 6 Oct 92 12:52:02 -0700
X-Received: from TMS-E40-PORT-7.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTPid AA01832; Tue, 6 Oct 92 15:51:48 EDT
X-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle.usenet
X-Command: Send_AEvt(doAutoForward)



Did anyone ever write to <mp8510a@auvm.american.edu> about
this little episode?


Curious,
Dhanesh

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

larry@elvisxlnt.com (Larry Pollack) writes:
> tertium@milton.u.washington.edu (l boyd) writes:
> |> A certain "Michael J. Procman" <MP8510A@auvm.american.edu> writes:
> |> 
> |> >  Please do not misinterpret this.  I am a supporter of Dan Quayle, so
> |> >please let me explain myself.
> |> 
> |> >  I am an exchange student from Germany.  I am also a member of what
> |> >Americans would call the far right party.  We support the ideals of the
> |> >Nazis and Hitler.  Dan Quayle and Mr. Buchanan, at least by their
> |> >rhetoric, would be excellent candidates in my country.
> |> >
> |> >  [and so on, the remaining drivel being too inflammatory to repeat]
> |> 
> |> Hmm, this should be enough to tell any *thinking*, *compassionate* person
> |> what you stand for, and hopefully they will ignore the rest [...]
>
> Thank you for the response. I found the original post interesting and
> disturbing and I am glad that not everyone told the poster to go blow.
> 
> Perhaps this is a cruel and sick joke or someone left their terminal
> unattended. That doesn't change the fact that these views are held by
> more than one person and are being preached to attract more people. [...]
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: debates
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 92 09:20:00 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:

> In <cass8806.299@elan.glassboro.edu> cass8806@elan.glassboro.edu
> (KYLE CASSIDY) writes:
> >i can barely wait to see our boy dan take on al gore in the debate.
> >
> >any thoughts on who might win?

> It's hard to tell, but... I reckon it will either be Dan Quayle or Al Gore.

Hopefully the readership of a.f.d-q will win by getting some juicy new
entries for the quotes file!

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Best 'Murphy Brown Quote'
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 08:37:26 CDT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

tertium@milton.u.washington.edu (l boyd) writes:

> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>
> >sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) writes:
>
> >> MB:  "What planet is he FROM?"
> >>
> >> So far, I've not come up with an answer.
> >> But we know it is not Mars.
> >>
>
> >Dunno.  Maybe he's been swimming around too much in the canals they've got u
> >there... <g>
>
> You spose that face on mars is a monument to JDQ?  After all, there is no sig
> of *intelligent* life on Mars...
>
> Lauren
>
> (-;
>

Actually, that face on Mars looks more like Marilyn to me... :-)



>Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us<
>Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087<
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson)
Subject: The Last Word on "Potatoe".
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 12:49:59 GMT

Last week, the Globe & Mail (Canada's National Newspaper) ran a
headline that spelled Ontario Premier Bob Rae's name "Raee."

And according to Kirk LaPointe, Ottawa bureau chief for the Canadian
Press wire service, the federal government commissioned a report
wherein "potato" was spelled "potatoe" every time.

So I expect to see as much ranting and raving over these two examples
as there was over Quayle's spelling mistake.

Thank you.

Michael