HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: "Roman Fietze"@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM,
        "KAG CP Development"@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM,
        49 711 406 2839 <fietze@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM>
Subject: SCO ODT w/3C503 Transfer Rate
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Reply-To: fietze@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM
Organization: Kodak AG, Office Imaging, Product Engineering and Development
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:12:45 GMT
Return-Receipt-To: fietze@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM
Precedence: bulk

Welcome to the real world,

Equipment:
----------
Compaq Deskpro 386/20, 3C503 and some other stuff
SCO ODT 1.x

Problem:
--------
The transfer rate on the ethernet is much faster going out than coming
in. I tried it with ftp (connecting to a SUN Sparc 2 and a HP
9000/375). Here the results for a 1MByte file (average values from
multiple measurements at different days, times and network loads):

Compaq -> Sun     10.5 s
Compaq <- Sun     11.5 s
Compaq -> HP       9.0 s
Compaq <- HP      15.2 s
HP     -> Sun      5.0 s
HP     <- Sun      5.1 s

The faster speed of HP<->Sun is _NOT_ the problem, but the different
speeds to and from the HP and the Sun, where I've seen much bigger
differences (especially to/from the Sun), maybe depending on the
overall load on the net.

Question:
---------
Can I do something (buffers, kernel parameters, ...) like with the
mount command (wsize and rsize) to optimze the (input) speed.

Thanks a lot, Roman

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Heaven and Hell ...
   Heaven is were the police are British, the mechanics are German, the
 cooks are French, the lovers are Italian an all is organized by the
 Swiss.
   Hell is were the cooks are British, the mechanics are French, the
 lovers are Swiss, the police are German and all is organized by the
 Italians.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Roman Fietze (Mail Code 2201)                    Hedelfinger Str. 154
Copier and Printer Development                      7000 Stuttgart 60
Kodak AG                                                      Germany
fietze@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM                  VOICE 49-711-406-2839
fietze@kodak.COM                                    K-NET 28-631-2839
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: Lee Penn  <lee@dlpco.dlpco.COM>
Subject: Digital Telco MUX solutions
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 20:18:17 GMT
Precedence: bulk

We are seeing customers who want remote sites with a small number 
of terminals and printers; typical is 2 terminals + 1 printer.

Digibd has a nice solution for 16 ports at a remote site over a
56kb digital service from the telephone company, but customers
balk at paying for 16 ports when they only need 3 or 4.

Digital line modems cost around $595. retail.  This is 
competitive given monthly telco charges of under $300/month.

However, there seems to be no simply MUX solution for remote 
sites.

OF course, all this would be really easy if the US had a good X25 
network such as found in Europe.  Another way to go would be via
internet and TCP/IP, but internet connections are hard to come 
by.

Anyway... Looking for solutions and contacts.


                                - Lee -
================================================================================
Lee Penn,  DLP Technologies, Inc.                     Voice: 513 232-7791
SCO Advanced Product Center                           FAX: (513) 232-7801
7444 Jager Ct.
Cincinnati, OH  45230-4344                           email: lee@dlpco.COM
From: smith@pyrite.SOM.CWRU.Edu (Phil Smyth)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: disk mirroring
Date: 19 Nov 1992 22:11:58 GMT
Organization: WSOM CSG, CWRU, Cleve., OH, 44106, USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: pyrite.som.cwru.edu

I noticed the headers of the original article
has the correct reply to, but when the article
arrrived via email it was munged.
the tail end of the address read: ncoast.org!smith!hal9000
it should have read ncoast.org!hal9000!smith

In article <199211182012.AA27712@pyrite.SOM.CWRU.Edu> hal9000%smith@ncoast.org writes:
>Is anyone doing it?
>What are the pros & cons on the subject?


--
"If you had left when these credits began, you would be home by now"
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: "Paul A. Fischer, Sr UNIX Sys Consultant" <paul@openage.com>
Subject: Re: Call back techniques. (fwd)
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:24:46 GMT
Precedence: bulk

>: If you are using UUCP you can setup the CALLBACK option in the Permissions 
>: file.  If not you can try using the "ct" command.
>: 
>Does ct actually work now?  Last I checked with SCO, it was still
>quite broken.

I've used it before with no problem.  You just have to be on a tty, because it 
needs to bind to the port.  It can't be run from cron.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Independent SCO support and service provider in the D.C. metro area.
No Incumbents in '92. Get the crooks out of office. Vote & Send a Message
Paul A. Fischer           | Open Age Inc.  | paul@openage.com
Sr. UNIX Sys. Consultant  | (301) 948-6422 | (301) 948-9644 Fax

Newsgroups: biz.sco.general,biz.sco.opendesktop
From: ajay@ (Ajay Barve-273-3023.  System Administrator)
Subject: BOOTP implementation on SCO UNIX
Followup-To: ajay@acctlabv.uta.edu
Organization: /usr/local/lib/news/organization
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 15:40:09 GMT

Is there a BOOTP implementation that will run on opendesktop 2.0.  If
there is one please could some one tell me where to find it?

Thanks,

Ajay Barve
Center for Accounting Software Evaluation.
University of Texas at Arlington.

Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: "Paul A. Fischer, Sr UNIX Sys Consultant" <paul@openage.com>
Subject: Call back techniques. (fwd)
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 19:59:16 GMT
Precedence: bulk

>We're looking for any information regarding getting "generic" UNIX boxes
>to do call backs when they are called. Right now, we dial in to several 
>different flavors of UNIX, from HP-UX, AIX etc to Interactive and SCO.
>We're running SCO 3.2.2 ourselves.

>What we're interested in is some relatively portable way that we can get
>the called computer to call us back after we've logged in. We've got one
>client that is doing it already, but it's a feature of the modem. We're
>looking for a "softer" technology.

>It doesn't have to be anything real fancy, the enabling technology would
>be great, then we can mold it to our will for validation etc.

If you are using UUCP you can setup the CALLBACK option in the Permissions 
file.  If not you can try using the "ct" command.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Independent SCO support and service provider in the D.C. metro area.
No Incumbents in '92. Get the crooks out of office. Vote & Send a Message
Paul A. Fischer           | Open Age Inc.  | paul@openage.com
Sr. UNIX Sys. Consultant  | (301) 948-6422 | (301) 948-9644 Fax

Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: kgermann@zeos.com (Ken Germann)
Subject: Hard Disk Chewing
Organization: Zeos International, Ltd
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 00:04:02 GMT


I have a problem where the system hard drives are continually going until 
someon logs into the system. Once someone is on the system, they are idle
most of the time until a file is accessed. Anyone have an idea of how
to trace the cause?
-- 
Ken Germann              ZZZZ EEEE  OO   SSS    ZEOS International, Ltd.  
support@zeos.com   INET     Z E    O  O S       Technical Support Dept.
uunet!zeos!support UUCP    Z  EE   O  O  SS     530 5th Ave N.W.
                  VOICE   Z   E    O  O    S    St. Paul, MN 55112
#include <disclaimer.h>  ZZZZ EEEE  OO  SSS     
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: brian@ilinx.wimsey.bc.ca (Brian J. Murrell)
Subject: Re: Fax products for Unix (fwd)
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 22:23:10 GMT
Precedence: bulk

> 
>    One of our clients is looking for a fax product that runs under SCO
> Unix that will integrate directly with WordPerfect.  They require most
> of the typical functions (they don't require inbound fax capability,
> but they need the ability to run more than one outbound line, do long-
> distance at night if desired, restrict who can send long-distance
> faxes, etc.).  They also want it to appear as a printer on WordPerfect's
> Shift-F7 menu, and have the system ask them for the information for
> routing (phone number, possibly contact name).  This last one is the
> only one we haven't found yet.
> 
>    For those of you who are using a fax server product and WordPerfect,
> I'd appreciate hearing what you're using and how well they integrate.
> I already know of some products that provide an interface similar to
> the standard lp, and some that appear as printers under lp, but I doubt
> either one can be configured to integrate as well with WP as they
> would like.

I use and sell a product which does all you want and more...

Faximum - Fax for UNIX.  It has won all the reviews it's been in, has been
adopted by Hewlett-Packard as "their" fax solution.

E-mail me if you want more details...

brian

-- 
Brian J. Murrell                                        brian@ilinx.wimsey.bc.ca
InterLinx Support Services, Inc.                        uunet!van-bc!ilinx!brian
North Vancouver, B.C.
        Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
From: lee@dlpco.dlpco.COM (Lee Penn )
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: SLIP Drivers
Keywords: slip,unix,sco,TCP/IP
Date: 19 Nov 92 03:03:29 GMT
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Precedence: bulk

>From uunet.uucp!xenitec.on.ca!news Wed Nov 18 19:17:25 1992
>To: xenitec.on.ca!distribution@uunet
>Xref: xenitec biz.sco.opendesktop:1149 biz.sco.general:5683
>Newsgroups: biz.sco.opendesktop,biz.sco.general
>Path: xenitec!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!caen!batcomputer!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!blkbox!mknewman
>From: Marc Kraker Newman <xenitec.on.ca!uunet!blkbox!mknewman@uunet>
>Subject: SLIP Drivers
>Organization: The Black Box, PO Box 591822 Houston, TX 77259-1822 
>Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 00:54:00 GMT
>Message-Id: <1992Nov18.005400.9013@blkbox>
>Summary: Flow control does not work on SCO slip drivers
>Keywords: slip,unix,sco,TCP/IP

>Can anyone tell me why the SCO SLIP drivers in my ODT 1.1g do not support
>flow control?  I am using it with a V32/V42bis modem, which can handle more
>than 9600 baud, but when I try 19200 or 38400, the modem is signaling via CTS 
>for the system to slow down, but the system just keeps sending data, causing
>lost packets, and eventual shutdown of the slip connection.

>I have seen several SLIP drivers in the public domain.  Has anyone gotten any
>of these going under SCO or ODT?

>Thanks in advance.


>-- 
>Marc K. Newman (N5SLG)                 Is UNIX pronounced 
>mknewman@blkbox.com                    "UNIQUES" or
>PO BOX 591822                          "EUNICHS"?
>Houston, Texas 77259-1822

If you start a PPP session and then flip to another terminal and
do:   stty -a < /dev/ttyxxxx  against the PPP port, do you show
that flow control is really off????

Perhaps you could start a process like:

(stty ctsflow rtsflow ; cat > /dev/null)</dev/ttyxxxxx &

to hold the port with flow control prior to doing the PPP.  
Wonder if PPP has a way to specify flow control.



================================================================================
Lee Penn,  DLP Technologies, Inc.                     Voice: 513 232-7791
SCO Advanced Product Center                           FAX: (513) 232-7801
7444 Jager Ct.
Cincinnati, OH  45230-4344                           email: lee@dlpco.COM
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: kgermann@zeos.com (Ken Germann)
Subject: C & SCO Libs Q
Organization: Zeos International, Ltd
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:21:38 GMT

Does anyone know where "sigmask", "sigblock" and "sigsetmask" are define
in the SCO Libraries or header files?


Is there a valid replacement that is available?
-- 
Ken Germann              ZZZZ EEEE  OO   SSS    ZEOS International, Ltd.  
support@zeos.com   INET     Z E    O  O S       Technical Support Dept.
uunet!zeos!support UUCP    Z  EE   O  O  SS     530 5th Ave N.W.
                  VOICE   Z   E    O  O    S    St. Paul, MN 55112
#include <disclaimer.h>  ZZZZ EEEE  OO  SSS
From: mike@sojurn.lns.pa.us (Mike J. Sangrey)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: emacs 18:59 crashes on select()
Date: 22 Nov 92 03:39:30 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Humble Pilgrimage Palace

In <9211152326.AA06045@jpradley.jpr.com> jpr@jpradley.jpr.com (Jean-Pierre Radley) writes:

>SCO ODT 2.0 here.

>I've compiled emacs v 18:59 with cc and with gcc.

>Either way, it crashes after any key is pressed after startup with the message

>	select error: Invalid argument

>What's going on?

  The error is occurring in fileio.c, if I remember right.

  The problem is that SCO decided to put struct timeval {} in sys/select.h.
  The emacs code assumes some things (albeit, wrongly), since it can't find
  the timeval struct.  The trick is to get the code to include sys/select.h
  at all the right times.   Make sure that select.h gets #included in
  each of the following files and that should get you close.  Take a good
  look at the #include <timestuff> in each of the files.

	    dispnew.c
	    fileio.c
	    gettime.h
	    s-sco.h
	    sysdep.c

  If you need more help, give me an email buzz.

  I've posted a followup, instead of just email, since this question will
  probably come up again.  

  mike@sojurn.lns.pa.us

>-- 
>Jean-Pierre Radley   Unix in NYC   jpr@jpr.com   jpradley!jpr   CIS: 72160.1341
-- 
  |  UUCP-stuff:  rutgers!devon!sojurn!mike  | "You can't save a bad idea    |
  |  Internet  :  mike@sojurn.lns.pa.us      |  by great execution."         |
  |  Fast-stuff:  (717) 396-9897             |                Moses Porter   |
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: sl@wimsey.bc.ca (Stuart Lynne)
Subject: Re: ftp problems
Organization: BC News and Mail
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 04:40:41 GMT

In article <BxuAuv.1pJ@wimsey.bc.ca> sl@wimsey.bc.ca (Stuart Lynne) writes:
>I think I have tracked down the source of the problems we're seeing with ftp
>out of vanbc. This has mystified me a bit. As I've mentioned before, even

>neighbour. Basically it spits out 40kb of data then stops for a while. Then
>it eventually start's up and slowly sends more (we see this watching the
>hash marks). 

>the timeouts on sending to get around this. Things would still be slow. But
>at least they would work. 

Well I RTFM'd. ftpd has a -t timeout flag. So I've increased the timeout
for van-bc's ftpd to 3600 seconds. If you still have problems with van-bc
timing out you can use the ftp idle command to increase it further (up to 
7200 seconds).

So if you've had problems in the past it might be a bit better now. It will
still be slow. But hopefully it will be more reliable.

-- 
Stuart Lynne <sl@wimsey.bc.ca> ....................... UNIX Facsimile Software
Wimsey Information Technologies ................... moderator biz.sco.binaries
uucp login:nuucp passwd:nuucp .................. ftp.wimsey.bc.ca:~ftp/ls-lR.Z
PD Software for SCO UNIX .................. ftp.wimsey.bc.ca:~ftp/pub/wimseypd
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: elliottm@csulb.edu (Mike Elliott)
Subject: Users denied use of printers -- why?
Organization: Cal State Long Beach
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 05:53:08 GMT

I'm having problems with users being denied the use of the printer by the
print spooler.  in sysadmsh the instructions are to leave the field blank
if all are allowed, then leave the next field blank if all are to be
denied.  Does this mean I have to explicitly enter every user in the
allowed field, then some sacrificial user in the denied field?  How can I
just let everyone use the printer?
-- 


                                           Mike Elliott
                                           elliottm@beach.csulb.edu
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: chare@unilabs.uucp (Chris Hare)
Subject: Re: For history books
Organization: UniLabs Research Group
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 22:39:44 GMT

In article <1992Nov21.165740.11709@Celestial.COM> bill@Celestial.COM (Bill Campbell) writes:
>In <9211200955.aa10127@dlpco.dlpco.COM> lee@dlpco.dlpco.COM (Lee Penn ) writes:
>
>:I keep a calendar of events following DLP's history.  The 
>:following popped up today:
>
>:11/23/83-Model 16a (Radio Shack) Computer, no hard drive, $5,920
>
>:        12 Meg Hard Drive to go with it                   $2,545
>
>:This system ran XENIX from Radio Shack which was originally
>:ported by SCO to the 68000 processor.
>...........^^^^
>
>This was ported by Microsoft, not SCO.  MS did work on a Real
>Operating System once upon a time in a universe far away.  I
>don't think SCO was even in business when Xenix was first
>released for the Radio Shack Model 16 in early 1983.
Well Bill ... 

In my collection of machines here, I have an old Spectrix Series 10 68000
machine which runs a version of 68000 XENIX which _was_ ported by SCO.  I
think SCO was founded in 1979.  This Spectrix box has a lot of SCO
copyright notices in it which date back to 1983.

>at TCBUG in Fort Worth in 1984 (or was it 1985 :-) and I thought
>he was nuts trying to get Xenix to run on 8086 and 80286 CPUs.
Well, I know that I first started working with XENIX on the '286 in early
1986!

-- 
????                --- It Always works for me! ---                           
Chris Hare, UNIX Scientist                  Preferred : chare@unilabs.org
Just a mild-mannered consultant by day ....
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: apl@world.std.com (Anthony P Lawrence)
Subject: Re: ODT & Price Competition
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 23:20:28 GMT

gary@tmg.soundex.celestial.com ("Gary L. Miller") writes:
: 
: What's going to happen when NT is available with the equiv. of all of
: SCO's products bundled for under $500 retail?
: 

If it truly was the equivalent of all SCO's products, I'd buy it, and
happily throw away all my accumulated Unix "stuff".

But it isn't.  And it won't be.  So I won't.



		Tony   apl@world.std.com

Lawrence & Clark, Inc		(617) 762-0707	(206) 323-2864
Xenix/Unix support,etc 	 	 Boston		 Seattle
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: bill@Celestial.COM (Bill Campbell)
Subject: Re: For history books
Organization: Celestial Software, Mercer Island, WA
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 16:57:40 GMT

In <9211200955.aa10127@dlpco.dlpco.COM> lee@dlpco.dlpco.COM (Lee Penn ) writes:

:I keep a calendar of events following DLP's history.  The 
:following popped up today:

:11/23/83-Model 16a (Radio Shack) Computer, no hard drive, $5,920

:        12 Meg Hard Drive to go with it                   $2,545

:This system ran XENIX from Radio Shack which was originally
:ported by SCO to the 68000 processor.
...........^^^^

This was ported by Microsoft, not SCO.  MS did work on a Real
Operating System once upon a time in a universe far away.  I
don't think SCO was even in business when Xenix was first
released for the Radio Shack Model 16 in early 1983.

I remember the first time I met Doug Michels when he was speaking
at TCBUG in Fort Worth in 1984 (or was it 1985 :-) and I thought
he was nuts trying to get Xenix to run on 8086 and 80286 CPUs.

There were a lot of pissed-off Radio Shack Xenix customers when
Tandy went the Intel/MS-DOS route and abandoned the 68000!

Bill
-- 
INTERNET:  bill@Celestial.COM   Bill Campbell; Celestial Software
UUCP:   ...!thebes!camco!bill   6641 East Mercer Way
             uunet!camco!bill   Mercer Island, WA 98040; (206) 947-5591
SPEED COSTS MONEY -- HOW FAST DO YOU WANT TO GO?
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: "Paul A. Fischer, Sr UNIX Sys Consultant" <paul@openage.com>
Subject: Problems with fsck root disk
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:34:11 GMT
Precedence: bulk

>I have recently down an upgrade (not an install) from 
>ODT 1.1 to ODT 2.0.  I was running Digital's enhanced
>MPX (DEC MPX 1.2) and upgraded to SCO MPX 2.0.  This
>update was applied to an applicationDEC 433MP.

>Everything seemed to go well, except the machine hangs
>just before printing out the maintenance mode prompt.
>I believe this is where it issues an fsck /dev/root.
>If I hit DELETE (SIGINT key) I finally do get the prompt.
>The problem is that I can not fsck the root disk.

># /etc/fsck -b  /dev/root

>just hangs.  No wonder I am hanging on reboots.  The
>device entry for the root disk is:

>br--r-----   1 root     backup     1, 40 Oct 29 17:49 /dev/root

>The idea of not being able to fsck my root disk does not sit
>very well with my stomach.  Note that the system runs fine otherwise,
>at least for now.

Sounds like your fsck executable is corrupt.  Is it possible you still have the 
file system as a type AFS, when ODT 2.0 needs the root fs to be EAFS?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Independent SCO support and service provider in the D.C. metro area.
No Incumbents in '92. Get the crooks out of office. Vote & Send a Message
Paul A. Fischer           | Open Age Inc.  | paul@openage.com
Sr. UNIX Sys. Consultant  | (301) 948-6422 | (301) 948-9644 Fax
From: aehall@sumax.seattleu.edu (...)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: SCO TCP/IP & Internet
Date: 24 Nov 92 02:06:52 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Seattle University

I'm in the process of setting up a SCO Unix (3.2.4) system with
TCP/IP (the most recent version, I forget the number...).

Something odd happens when I try to telnet.  I can telnet to a remote site
just fine, but when I close the connection and try to telnet again I get
a "Network unreachable" error.
What would cause this?
It seems odd that I can telnet once, but not more than once...

Thanks,
Anthony

-- 
Anthony Hall                             _   _   Unix System Administrator
aehall@sumax.seattleu.edu               /_/ /_/ Physician Micro Systems, Inc.
aehall@calvin.seattleu.edu             _   _   2033 6th Ave Suite 707
                                      /_/ /_/ Seattle, WA 98122  206-441-8490
From: jpr@jpradley.jpr.com (Jean-Pierre Radley)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: emacs 18:59 crashes on select()
Date: 16 Nov 92 04:26:41 GMT
Reply-To: jpr@jpr.com
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 285
Precedence: bulk

SCO ODT 2.0 here.

I've compiled emacs v 18:59 with cc and with gcc.

Either way, it crashes after any key is pressed after startup with the message

	select error: Invalid argument

What's going on?

-- 
Jean-Pierre Radley   Unix in NYC   jpr@jpr.com   jpradley!jpr   CIS: 72160.1341
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: rstory@elegant.com (Robert Story)
Subject: no echoing at boot up
Summary: Responses don't echo and ^J required during boot procedure.
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 14:58:52 GMT
Organization: Elegant Communications Inc.

Recently, rather than rebooting a sco unix 3.2.2 system, I used 'telinit 1'
to get to single user mode.  Since then, start up does *not* echo
responses AND requires a ^J in place of merely hitting the return key.
This means that I can't use ^D to get the system started but must
instead login in at the maintenance level and then do a 'telinit 2' from
there.  

Can anyone tell me what controls the startup (presumably the console)
term configuration?  Or is it something else?

Thanks.

Regards,
   Robert.
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general