HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sid@drc.UUCP (SiD ViCioUs)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Qedit with v1.65
Date: 3 Sep 92 04:31:57 GMT
Organization: BLa Bla Bla Bla Bla BLa BLa Concord,Ca

system@precipice.chi.il.us (Vikki Welch) writes:

> sid@drc.UUCP (SiD ViCioUs) writes:
> 
> > Hi, Umm I was wondering if any one knew what to do on this:
> >
> > Ok Im running Waffle v1.65 (Just upgradded last night), DrDOS6.0 and I
> > cant seem to get qedit to load as a editior.. I used the config. that it
> > came with.. And I got it to say Im useing Qedit as a editior..But when I
> > go to post no qedit.. And yes.. I have qmodem in C:\bin..
>                                         |^^^^^^
> I hope you mean QEdit-------------------|       <grin>.

For all who helped!! And Sorry.. Yes, I did mean Qedit.. NOT Qmodem. :)
The problem was solved with the "admin t sid" command. I didn't know
that stuff was there... Thanks again..

        -SiD
               \\///
               |o o|
 ___________nnn|_^_|nnn____________________________________________________
| sid@drc.UUCP              ||"It doesn't matter how big your pencil is;   |
| sid%boo@pacbell.com       || it's how you sign your name"                |
| 1@5053        WWIVnet     ||               -Dave Mustang (Megadeth)      |
|                           ||                                             |
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4711 comp.bbs.waffle:2081
From: sid@drc.UUCP (SiD ViCioUs)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Qedit with v1.65
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 12:20:55 PDT
Organization: BLa Bla Bla Bla Bla BLa BLa Concord,Ca

Hi, Umm I was wondering if any one knew what to do on this:

Ok Im running Waffle v1.65 (Just upgradded last night), DrDOS6.0 and I 
cant seem to get qedit to load as a editior.. I used the config. that it 
came with.. And I got it to say Im useing Qedit as a editior..But when I 
go to post no qedit.. And yes.. I have qmodem in C:\bin..

        -SiD
               \\///
               |o o|
 ___________nnn|_^_|nnn____________________________________________________
| sid@drc.UUCP              ||"It doesn't matter how big your pencil is;   |
| sid%boo@pacbell.com       || it's how you sign your name"                |
| 1@5053        WWIVnet     ||               -Dave Mustang (Megadeth)      |
|                           ||                                             |
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4714 comp.bbs.waffle:2117
From: karl@dadoka.h.ni.schule.de (Karl Sarnow)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Qedit with v1.65
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 08:04:32 EDT
Organization: Karls Emergency Mailbox

ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims) writes:

> sid@drc.UUCP (SiD ViCioUs) writes:
> 
> >Ok Im running Waffle v1.65 (Just upgradded last night), DrDOS6.0 and I 
> >cant seem to get qedit to load as a editior.. I used the config. that it 
> >came with.. And I got it to say Im useing Qedit as a editior..But when I 
> >go to post no qedit.. And yes.. I have qmodem in C:\bin..
> 
> What is your local editor set up for.  Hint...  admin t.

Use Admin T to set the editor. I was fooled by that new fact too.

Karl

------Dr. Karl Sarnow -------------- Gymnasium Grossburgwedel ------------
EuNet:      Karl.Sarnow@Arbi.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE
or          sarnow@gygro.h.ni.schule.de \
                                          ODS : Offenes Deutsches Schulnetz
or          karl@dadoka.h.ni.schule.de	/	Open for german Schools.
BIX:        ksarnow
CompuServe: 100010,601
--------------------- European Schools Project --------------------------
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4717 comp.bbs.waffle:2164
From: fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Lock-up?
Date: 4 Sep 92 02:48:02 GMT
Followup-To: comp.bbs.waffle
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

Nick, alt.bbs.waffle was superseded by comp.bbs.waffle .  Please use
comp.bbs.waffle in the future.

In article <nick.1dyr@hotcity.COM> nick@hotcity.COM (Nick Assar) writes:
|1) How come Waffle displays those periods (.) when there is no acitivty.

To let you know that it's not hung.

|2) How come after about 240 periods, Waffle lock's up?

It's never done this for me.  However, my BBS is busy enough with events
and calls that it's probably never hit 240 periods.  What's your system
setup like?

  Bill
-- 
Bill Fenner	fenner@cs.psu.edu	..psuvax1!hogbbs!wcfpc!wcf
		wcf@hogbbs.scol.pa.us   (+1 814 238-9633 v.32bis)
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4712 comp.bbs.waffle:2094
From: ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Qedit with v1.65
Date: 30 Aug 92 23:28:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: nwnexus.1992Aug30.232833.13460
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505

sid@drc.UUCP (SiD ViCioUs) writes:

>Ok Im running Waffle v1.65 (Just upgradded last night), DrDOS6.0 and I 
>cant seem to get qedit to load as a editior.. I used the config. that it 
>came with.. And I got it to say Im useing Qedit as a editior..But when I 
>go to post no qedit.. And yes.. I have qmodem in C:\bin..

What is your local editor set up for.  Hint...  admin t.
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: BBS Standards Committ
Date: 27 Aug 92 11:52:22 GMT
Organization: The Gator Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-3745

brad@clarinet.com (Brad Templeton) writes:

>Yes, programs like UFGATE can get net messages into TBBS and many other
>systems -- but at what cost?

>Most of these boards have tremendous limitations in their messaging
>systems.   25 character From lines.   40 character (or less) subject lines.
>"To:" lines that refer to the BBS concept that one would post a public
>board message that was to somebody instead of for the general audience.
>And no other header lines, except stored in the body, so no ability
>to handle all the things the meaningful header lines say.

The key issue which Chris fails to acknowledge is that TBBS multiline
needs to be brought down to single user mode to process incoming email/news
using gate software -- then tossing and scanning into the TBBS message
base.  So, a 16 line system must be brought down to a halt while the gating
is done -- while a UNIX machine can process all of the news in the background -
and I would think that there would be other DOS based BBS software which could
handle the gating in the background as well -- all though I would doubt that
this software could support more than 4 lines under DOS.  Plus, like
you (Brad) has mentioned -- TBBS is VERY limited in the size of the messages
(remember many of the usenet articles are > 50K -- so I can only assume TBBS 
will STRIP these messages which is just about WORTHLESS. 

So, if someone is serious about running a multiline BBS which support usenet
news and email -- they had better forget about DOS.  It proves once again
to be very limited.

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: ppg@oasis.icl.co.uk (Philippe Goujard)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.bbs.misc
Subject: Nixpub meaning
Date: 1 Sep 92 12:04:41 GMT
Followup-To: alt.bbs
Organization: ICL, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 4SN, UK

kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan) writes:

>The only thing I can think of perhaps changing would be adding USENET
>systems running on non-UNIX machines. For instance, what difference
>does it make if I run Waffle under DOS or Waffle under UNIX - you'll
>never interact with a shell/COMMAND.COM, so you really would never
>know the difference, as an end-user.

I disagree with that.

The way I see the Nixpub list (phil correct me if I'm wrong) is a list
for people who are interested in unix systems and are looking for a site
nearby where they can learn more, or practice or get some services (such
as news, email etc...).
It is NOT intended primary as a list of sites who provide usenet access
(and indeed some sites in the list only provide shell access or anon UUCP).

So what is the interest of a nixpub list? 
Well for me it is intended for people who want to :
- Learn/practice the shell
- Practice C programming
- Feel comfortable with unix utilities and want to use them.
- Use "classic" unix public-domain software (elm,emacs,tin,nn,rn...)
- Want to exchange ideas with other Unix users.

In that objective, I think any Unix-like OS can be accepted.
Of course there are lots of differences between say, AIX and Minix or Linux
and Xenix but the point is that users view themselves as unix users
(And I bet most of them are reading comp.unix.*).
Now on the question on coherent and QNX I think both could apply.
QNX being now very close to the acception of Unix, and most of the public
domain software compiling without hassle.

But I dont think OS like VMS, OS/2 or MS/DOS should be included, even if they
have the tools to "look like" unix. 
A reason is that OS/2 users for example dont see themselves as Unix users.
Even if with MS/DOS you can have a sort of multi-tasking (concurent dos,
desqview etc...) and there are some tools (MKS toolkit...) that give you
some unix shell and unix utilities there is definitely not the same level of
services and reliability you find on a Unix or Unix-like.
So please no OS war, this list is intended for Unix systems and 90% of the
people will agree that MS/dos even with x,y,z software is not unix.


Now I also think that the systems listed in the Nixpub should say clearly
what kind of services they offer, because for example a system that offers
no shell access, no uucp, only news and email might not be very attractive 
for somebody who is willing to learn more about Unix. 
But in the other hand it might be attractive for someone who is looking for
usenet access and is used to the unix news and mail software.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philippe GOUJARD                              Email : ppg@oasis.icl.co.uk
From: davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: BBS Standards Committ
Date: 3 Sep 92 09:10:33 GMT
Organization: Aegis Society, Kyoto Japan

cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise) writes:

>From article <2544@aegis.or.jp>, by davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane):
>> If TBBS (or anything else) hasn't been designed for multi-tasking,
>> it could be a long long time.

>	TBBS/eSoft's problem, IMHO, is not that TBBS isn't built
>for multi-tasking (for what it is, a BBS, it does "multi-task" the
>system, very nicely).  Their problem is that they're understaffed.
>TAhey have, I believe, 3 different programmers to write software...

Hmmm, "multi-tasking as a BBS"; pretty creative re-definition. 

From what I other people have said, TBBS can run multi-TBBS-tasks,
that is applications that have been coded especially for it by
eSoft. It can't run ordinary DOS programs/utilities that the SA
might like to beg/borrow/use that have been written by others. But,
hey, if that's all you need why not go for it!

>> Oh well, lots of time to convince people they don't really need
>> to run stuff of their own design :-)

>	*chuckle*  I certainly wonder, sometimes :)

Well, I guess about all you can do is *chuckle* when your arguments
have been shown to hold any water like sieve. I hope your users are
naive enough to go for them! 

Dave

--
Dave McLane 
JUNET: davidg@aegis.or.jp (ONLY within Japan: post otherwise)
Nagaokakyoshi, Kyoto Japan Tel: +81-75-951-1168 Fax: +81-75-957-1087
From: damir@infopls.chi.il.us (Damir Matanic)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Croatian BBS
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 18:21:59 CDT
Organization: INFOPLUS support, Wheeling, IL

  Is there a Croatian BBS out there? 
damir@infopls.chi.il.us

--
damir@infopls.chi.il.us (Damir Matanic)
Infoplus BBS, +1 708 537 0247, v32bis. Home of Infoplus.
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.bbs.misc,comp.misc
From: dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (David W. Tamkin)
Subject: Re: Nixpub Posting (Long)
Organization: Contributor Account at ddsw1, Chicago, Illinois  60657
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 00:50:18 GMT
X-Disclaimer:  Material posted in this article is the sole responsibility of
                the poster and does not represent MCSNet or the system owners.

phil@bts.com (Phil Eschallier) wrote in <1992Sep1.120425.26376@bts.com>:

| 12/91  312-714-8568^      gagme      Chicago         IL 12/24/96    24
|   3B2/400 - System V 3.2.  E-mail, netnews, sources, access to anonymous
|   ftp, GIFs, UUCP, local message base, games, etc.  PEP and V.32 available
|   for logins and UUCP.  Contact greg@gagme.chi.il.us for more information.

Gagme relocated to another neighborhood of Chicago last weekend.  Its new
number is 312-282-8606 (still PCP'able).

David W. Tamkin   Box 59297   Northtown Station, Illinois  60659-0297
dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com    CompuServe: 73720,1570    MCI Mail: 426-1818
From: davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: TBBS is very limited
Date: 2 Sep 92 02:44:21 GMT
Organization: Aegis Society, Kyoto Japan

larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:

>davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane) writes:

>>Going back to what somebody else said (sorry, I forget who), I think
>>it's the case that when TBBS wants to run certain modules/whatever
>>(like handing incoming news) it needs to shut-down on-line operation.

>Yes -- all of the lines must shut down in order to process usenet news.

>So your 16 line BBS must go "off-hook" on all 16 lines to process news.
>Hmm -- just think - your news would be 24 hours old before leaving the
>system if you brought all 16 lines down once a day -- I can't imagine
>bringing all the lines down once an hour -- could you?

Nope. 

How about it TBBS fans, how often is the system you use/SA brought
down to process news? 

Dave

--
Dave McLane 
JUNET: davidg@aegis.or.jp (ONLY within Japan: post otherwise)
Nagaokakyoshi, Kyoto Japan Tel: +81-75-951-1168 Fax: +81-75-957-1087
From: bart@netcom.com (Harry Bartholomew)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: Packet Radio BBS
Date: 4 Sep 92 09:17:11 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

Yep. Read all about it in rec.radio.amateur.packet.

-- 
"Partly it may be due to a phenomenon known since the very dawn of spaceflight
in connection with certain pharmaceutical drugs. They induced adverse
psychological effects, including radical changes of mood and personality.
However the fact that they were prescribed by a physician militated
against the patient's chance of deducing that they were the proximate cause
of his suffering; indeed, he would be more inclined to ask for further drugs
to counteract the first, and since the whole process was extremely profitable
for all concerned save the ultimate consumer, they would be provided.
				John Brunner in "A Maze of Stars"
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Where's the BBS?
From: rtiger@vax1.umkc.edu
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 23:12:23 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Kansas City


Where's the bbs?
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: zoman@buhub.bradley.edu (Lorenzo Grooms)
Subject: Freenet
Summary: Freenet
Keywords: Cleveland Freenet
Organization: Bradley University
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 02:54:41 GMT

Does anybody know what happen to Cleveland Freenet, did they change there numberor what.  If anybody has it could they email me, please. Thanx in advance.

--
zoman@buhub.bradley.edu                                      Just call me ZO...
 Risk....risk is my business.
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: eng20204@nusunix2.nus.sg (LEE MUH HWA)
Subject: RA Doors
Organization: National University of Singapore
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 10:52:01 GMT

Thanks

Muh Hwa
eng20204@nusunix1.nus.sg

Xref: sparky alt.bbs:5345 comp.bbs.misc:605 comp.misc:3297
From: john@jho.com (John Ho)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: PC Pursuit
Summary: PC Pursuit
Keywords: PC Pursuit
Date: 2 Sep 92 16:14:33 GMT
Organization: Software Programming, Inc., Dallas, Texas USA

Can someone tell me how to get in touch with "PC Pursuit"?
-- 
John Ho from Dallas, Texas USA. (john@jho.com)           - No news is bad news.
Xref: sparky alt.bbs:5503 comp.bbs.misc:751 comp.misc:3412
From: sandy@godzilla.quotron.com (Sanford Zelkovitz)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.bbs.misc,comp.misc
Subject: Re: The bogus Nixpub Posting
Date: 28 Aug 92 21:38:26 GMT
Organization: Quotron Systems, Inc.

In article <5wdnkzc@dixie.com> jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes:
>kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan) writes:
>
>>Oh, this is utter nonsense. First, I've never seen Phil state anywhere that
>>his list is "comprehensive". Furthermore, he doesn't have to disclaim
>>squat. His list, his editing criteria, his bias. Clearly understood by
>>everyone (except you, apparently) who picks it up and reads it.
>
>Yeah?  Then why do I get a fairly steady stream of people asking me why
>dixie.com is not on the list?  
>

I am sure that Phil would be more than happy to put dixie on the list
if you would submit to the requirements that he has set as needed
( such as the telephone number of the system ). 


>>Since the list is tailored for people looking for a BBS, I see no reason to
>>include non-BBS's in it. I see Phil placeing Gwinnette.COM in the list
>>as about as helpful as listing Compuserve's phone number in it. Alot of
>>good Gwinnette's phone number does for someone with a modem looking for
>>a place to read news and mail.
>
>I must have missed where phil's list states that it is only for people
>looking for a BBS.  Correct me if I'm wrong.  At least in this area,
>people who ask for "public access" are looking for a site to get news
>and mail.  BBSing is an optional extra.  
>

If you look at the list, you will find systems listed that are not BBSes.

>
>John
>-- 

-- 
Sanford <sandy> Zelkovitz            XBBS
Voice: (714)821-9670   Data and FAX: (714)821-9671
....uunet!pride386!alphacm!sandy
sandy@smftst.Quotron.com (130.224.26.12)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise)
Subject: Re: BBS Standards Committ
Originator: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu
Organization: University of Vermont -- Division of EMBA Computer Facility
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 02:49:37 GMT

From article <BtFsxI.Kr6@gator.rn.com>, by larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder):
> I have to agree with Dave on this -- running DOS on a fast machine
> that could easily run UNIX is a handicap -- of course, unless the
> sysop doesn't want to learn UNIX.  A Unix BBS will have many more
> options and features than a DOS BBS -- and Unix from the ground up
> was designed to support multiple users.  
> 
> TBBS is limited -- TDBS is inflated and limited as well -- but 
> due to TBBS's design, TDBS was their only option.   With a real
> OS like UNIX, multiple users can be in real dbase, while another
> in foxbase, while another runnning Word Perfect, while another
> can be running TBBS under Merge (yes -- It does work -- at least
> 2.2 single line of which I have a licence for from way back)..

	IMHO, this OS-bickering is really just a matter of opinion of
what YOU as the SysOp want to run and what your USERS want to use.

	I'm not one of one of those "gee-whiz-spend-23-hours-a-day-programming"
kind of people.  I simply have other interests, to spend my time on, and
that's the reason why *I* don't use a unix BBS.  From my experience, all of the
packages I've seen would require me to make time consuming changes to the
source of the program and to begin to make the changes I want to run for
a BBS (which is almost always taken from the perspective "If I were a user,
I'd want things to work like...").  I'm also not a unix guru (but am
learning, slowly but surely! *grin*).

	That's why I use this templatey, unmodifyable program called TBBS.
It does what I want, how I want it, and I can do it in a reasonably short
amount of time.  My users, who consist primarily of teachers and students who
have had no experience with telecommunications, have found it easy
and intuitive to use from what I can gather from the amount of times they
logon.

	Basicly what prompted me on this tangent was your above statements
about users running Wordperfect, Foxbase, or a gazillion other programs
at the same time.  It simply doesn't interest me.  You might as well be telling
me you have a really cool photo of the space shuttle sitting next to your
box *grin*
 
 TTYL
 Chris
From: ST21519@VM.CC.LATECH.EDU
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Door Wanted
Date: 27 Aug 92 04:37:24 GMT
Organization: LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY

I'm looking for a door which will run other doors below it on an DOS based PC.
I've heard one called GMON, but have not located a copy of it yet.  If anyone
has a door which does this I would prefer the filename and where I might pick
up a copy (FTP, or FREQ at v.32bis).  I would really like to get one that does
not require a registration if possible.
 
Thanks!
From: davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: BBS Standards Committ
Date: 1 Sep 92 14:48:15 GMT
Organization: Aegis Society, Kyoto Japan

rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold) writes:

>davidg@aegis.or.jp (Dave McLane) writes:
>>Going back to what somebody else said (sorry, I forget who), I think
>>it's the case that when TBBS wants to run certain modules/whatever
>>(like handing incoming news) it needs to shut-down on-line operation.
>>Is this so? 

>Not quite.  If you want to run external programs, TBBS does indeed
>have to shut down, and they're run as external events.  If you run one
>of the programs provided by eSoft, however, these almost always allow
>you to keep the BBS running. 
[* details omitted *]
>anyone else.  However, if I wanted to run Xtree Gold, I'd have to shut
>down the BBS temporarily, and if you wanted to run Global War, you'd
>be out of luck on a multi-line system.  So there's a disadvantage
>compared to a system run under OS/2 or Unix. 

Sounds a bit like Galacticom's Major BBS. Can you get what you need
to write you own?  But as I say that, I realize that I don't *want*
to write may own. What I want to do is take what's already been done
cut and paste it to fit what needs to be done in my situation.

> On the other hand, we
>can run 8 lines off of a 10 MHz XT with 640K of memory, and the users,
>who aren't tech types, don't have to put up with a waffle type
>interface.

Hmmm, can those lines support 9,600 BPS v42bis downloads at full
speed? Perhaps it can but I've always wondered.....

Most of the people who use Aegis aren't tech types either, and they
enjoy not having to put up with answering endless questions to get
something done when they are paying line charges of $1.60/hour
locally (few), $8/hour nearby (most), $14/hour far (few). I don't
have to try and convince anybody of this: the first month's phone
bill usually does the job :-) 

Dave

--
Dave McLane 
JUNET/BITNET: davidg@aegis.or.jp
Nagaokakyoshi, Kyoto Japan Tel: +81-75-951-1168 Fax: +81-75-957-1087
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.bbs.misc,comp.misc
From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Subject: Re: The bogus Nixpub Posting
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 17:54:46 GMT
Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc.

jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes:

>>And furthermore, if you have no wish or need to attract more
>>subscribers, then there's no need to be on the nixpub list.

>Hmm.  Unless you're a person in Atlanta looking for local public access.

Then a person looking for Atlanta access would not be able to use your
machine, since you do not want more subscribers.

>Before you celebrate Dixie's being
>hurt by not being listed on the public toilet list

How is Dixie "hurt" by not being listed in a place that it was never
listed in before?

-- 
#ifdef TRUE         | Fuzzy Fox                  fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0   | a.k.a. David DeSimone      an207@cleveland.freenet.edu
#define  FALSE  1   |
#endif              |         How's my posting?  Call 1-800-ALT-FLAME
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: lucifer@world.std.com (Kevin S Green)
Subject: Re: PC Pursuit
Keywords: PC Pursuit
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 23:31:57 GMT

In article <1992Sep02.161433.5619@jho.com> john@jho.com (John Ho) writes:
|Can someone tell me how to get in touch with "PC Pursuit"?
|-- 
|John Ho from Dallas, Texas USA. (john@jho.com)           - No news is bad news.
1-800-736-1130


-- 
Kevin S. Green / lucifer@world.std.com / {xylogics;uunet}!world!lucifer
               /America Online: Gargoth
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.bbs.misc,comp.misc