HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: StarOwl@uiuc.edu (StarOwl)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Reply-To: StarOwl@uiuc.edu
Organization: Actuarial Science Program at UIUC
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 13:45:50 GMT
Keywords: significant words from a document used as an index to content

weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
: StarOwl@uiuc.edu writes:
: >William.A.Hall.Jr.@dartmouth.edu (William A. Hall Jr.) writes:

: >: That's why I am pro-life. I believe every individual -- born or unborn
: >: -- has the potential to make a positive impact on society, and should
: >: have the opportunity to do so (before AND after birth!) Unlike many
: >: pro-life individuals whose primary concern is in the womb, I also
: >: believe as much in getting kids out of the ghetto.
: >Unfortunately an equivalent but opposite argument can be made.
: >"I believe every individual -- born or unborn -- has the potential to
: >make a negative impact on society."  You never know if that clump
: >of cells in a woman's body is going to become the world's next
: >politician, lawyer, mass-murderer, or Klan leader.
: 	In this country, people are considered innocent until proven guilty.
: You cannot punish someone because they might commit a crime. 

You must be living in a different United States than I am.  It is 
currently legal for law enforcement officials to arrest you  and
confiscate your property on mere suspicion of committing a crime.
When they finally do release you  (for one reason or another), 
they do NOT have to (and they usually don't) return your property
or compensate you for wrongfully imprisoning you.

I wish that this country still worked on the principle of "innocent
until proven guilty."  Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be
reality any more.

--
Michael Adams (aka StarOwl)	 		"Republicans understand the
Internet:  StarOwl@uiuc.edu			 importance of bondage between
Bitnet:    FREE1217@UIUCVMD			 parent and child."
Anonymous: wi.5467@n7kbt.rain.com			-- Dan Quayle
UUCP:      ...!uiucuxc!uiuc.edu!StarOwl                                    

Marrou/Lord in '92
From: cj@eno.wpd.sgi.com (C J Silverio)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Yet more unsubstantiated stuff from Nyikos
Date: 11 Oct 92 06:47:06 GMT
Reply-To: cj@sgi.com (C J Silverio)
Organization: SGI TechPubs
NNTP-Posting-Host: eno.wpd.sgi.com

---
decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
|wdo@TEFS1.acd.com (Bill Overpeck) writes:
|> From: cj@eno.wpd.sgi.com (C.J. Silverio)
|> > Fuck off & die, Overpeck.
|> Hmm.  I guess your objections to needless deaths don't extend
|> to men, huh?

|Aw, now, she didn't say "Fuck off and die, all men."
|CJ, would y'all want little old me to fuck off and die needlessly?
|I think, and I apologize if I got this wrong, she was talking
|to you, Bill.

You're quite right, Dean-of-the-James-variety.  I was
specifically addressing Overpeck.  I usually have no
trouble parsing English sentences of the form

	<imperative>, <person>

as being addressed specifically to <person>.  But hey.  
Overpeck was trying for a cheap shot.  15 yards, loss
of down for Blatant Reaching.

---
cj@eno.wpd.sgi.com      C J Silverio/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720
"Distinctions of this kind are interesting because they notify us
about the limits of our empathy."  --Brian Eno
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.activism.d,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc
From: StarOwl@uiuc.edu (StarOwl)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Reply-To: StarOwl@uiuc.edu
Organization: Actuarial Science Program at UIUC
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 02:16:02 GMT
Keywords: significant words from a document used as an index to content

William.A.Hall.Jr.@dartmouth.edu (William A. Hall Jr.) writes:

: That's the biggest reason why abortion should be banned. People are
: *resources*, not "parasites" or "endless stomachs," as some of you on
: the net have claimed. If you don't agree with that statement, throw
: yourself off a roof right now -- human life is, in your opinion,
: worthless.

Actually, I thought it had been demonstrated a few years back that human
beings are really only worth $5 or $6...in raw materials.  :-)

--
Michael Adams (aka StarOwl)	 		"Republicans understand the
Internet:  StarOwl@uiuc.edu			 importance of bondage between
Bitnet:    FREE1217@UIUCVMD			 parent and child."
Anonymous: wi.5467@n7kbt.rain.com			-- Dan Quayle
UUCP:      ...!uiucuxc!uiuc.edu!StarOwl                                    

Marrou/Lord in '92



Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
Subject: Re: Feminists For Life...Huh?
Reply-To: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
Organization: North Carolina State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 01:30:19 GMT

In article <1992Oct11.153944.18790@nas.nasa.gov> 
dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King) writes:

> The point I was trying to get across is that
> despite FFLA's position on many other issues, their stand on the legality
> of abortion can hardly be called feminist.  


Since when did "Dan King" become the sole and final arbiter of
the definition of feminism?   Do you often have these desires 
to control the thoughts of people who call themselves feminists?
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Stranger than fiction: Simon Le Booth
Date: 14 Oct 92 02:38:29 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio


For the record, I am not a Nazi, I oppose it.  IJust because one writes about
something does not mean they support it.

My name is Simon Booth, not Le Booth.

In my story, there's no Room 101 scene, just a Hangar 18 scene. :)
From: SFC104@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,soc.college,pa.general,nj.events
Subject: Convention at Penn State
Date: 16 Oct 92 01:10:35 GMT
Organization: Penn State University


                   COLLEGE PRO-LIFERS TO MEET AT PENN STATE UNIVERSITY
20th College Pro-Life Convention to be Held on Oct. 23-25

Pro-life college students from campuses throughout Pennsylvania and neighboring
states will gather at Penn State University on the weekend of October 23rd-25th
for the 20th semi-annual College Pro-Life Convention of the Intercollegiate
Federation for Life (IFL).  The convention will be held on the main campus of
Penn State University.  Up to 200 students or more are expected to attend.

This fall's college pro-life convention will feature workshops by students,
speakers from pro-life groups such as Feminists for Life and Mom's House,
nationally known pro-life speakers, and others.  The convention will close on
Sunday Oct. 25th, as the college pro-lifers join forces with more than 1000
residents of State College, PA, for LifeChain, a peaceful, legal public
demonstration.  Participants in the LifeChain will line the sidewalks of
State College for two hours holding signs which say: "Abortion Kills Children".
Last year's LifeChain drew over 700 participants.

Founded in 1982, the Intercollegiate Federation for Life is the oldest
coalition of college pro-lifers in America.  Each semester, the IFL hosts a
College Pro-Life convention on a different college campus.  The IFL has
contacts and associated groups on over 63 campuses in Pennsylvania and dozens
more campuses in neighboring states.  Assisting in the formation of on-campus
pro-life groups is the main goal of the IFL.  The IFL also serves as an
information clearinghouse for college pro-life activities.  The IFL is an
entirely student-run, grass-roots volunteer organization.

For more information about the IFL or the convention send E-mail to
brian@opus.chem.psu.edu.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: "Snapple" Anti-Choice?
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 01:11:12 GMT

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
->cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:
->>I'm glad to see that you've finally dropped the charade of being
->>"pro-choice", Darcy.  

->Ah, context-cutting games. Is Keegan giving you lessons? 

don't you think a woman can make a decision for herself
without instruction from a male?
From: nadja@jetsun.weitek.COM (Nadja Adolf)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: True Story: How Pro-Lifers Try To Gain Support
Date: 16 Oct 92 23:52:49 GMT
Organization: WEITEK Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1992Oct16.202350.8932@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>
>I think there have been a couple of recent incidents in which
>ACT-UP people disrupted a church service in New York, throwing
>condoms around and shouting obscenities.
>On January 16, 1991 a group of AIDS activists stormed into the studio
>of CBS News during their evening news broadcast.
>
>Now, have any pro-lifers done that??

In the mid-1980s a Unitarian-Universalist Church in Seattle chose to
distribute condoms at service in memory of a minister of another
UU parish. The church was invaded and disrupted by offended Roman 
Catholics and Fundies.


-- 
The Earth Pig Bourne....

nadja@node.com (prefered email address)
nadja@weitek.com
From: smccabe@author.ecn.purdue.edu (Sarah A McCabe)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Question for Bruce Varney
Date: 12 Oct 92 20:59:10 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network

In article <1992Oct9.124814.2466@brandonu.ca> mcbeanb@brandonu.ca writes:
[Request for Bruce Varney to answer a repeatedly posed question deleted.]

You may want to repost this later in the week.  Purdue is on October
Break now.  Classes resume on Wednesday, but t.a articles tend to
expire quickly on my machine and on his as well, I presume.

Sarah McCabe
(nothing in this post should be taken as implicit or explicit support
of that slimy cretin known as Bruce Varney.)
From: ag1v+@andrew.cmu.edu (Andrea B. Gansley-Ortiz)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: rights and responsibilities
Date: 16 Oct 92 14:50:06 GMT
	<1992Oct14.203023.689@anasazi.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Mike Best writes:
>Wow, no difference between killing a unborn child or a child of 5?  I think
>your antagonist was correct, you are defending a twisted position.  This is
>what is so amusing about the pro-choice arguments, they have to argue an
>incredibly difficult position.

Well, firstly, I was responding to Ted's comments to someone else. Secondly,
Ted said "You people are so twisted!" which is a judgement call on the people
rather than on the people's views which is what you have done.

Question. What is the twisted position? Your comments lead me to believe that
you think *I'm* pro-choice. Were my words a pro-choice argument in your eyes?

The situation. One man said he changed from pro-life to pro-choice because
of his work with abused children. Ted then says, 
>= You people are so twisted!  You think that never having a life is better 
>= than being abused in your life!

All I said was that it's a hard decision to make. (Be pro-choice or pro-life)
And that the first man had a right to change his mind considering his realm
of experience. I don't agree with his decision. But I haven't seen what he
has. Maybe it would change my mind too. I don't think he's 'twisted' for 
changing he mind. Nor do I think his character should be attacked for having
changed his mind.

Again, what is the twisted position? Being pro-life, *I* don't see a difference
between killing my unborn child and my 5 year old child. If I did both with
knowing intent, it would at least be voluntary manslaughter. (I'm not up on
all the differences between the technicalities of killing in the law.) The
fact that you might or might not see the unborn child in that light does not
mean I don't. Therefore to me, they are the same.

ag
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: Dirty Laundry (was Re: supporting allegations)
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 22:05:46 GMT

rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla) writes:
->keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
->>rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla) writes:
->>->Jim, you seem to have a somewhat itchy trigger finger in accusing
->>->people of lying. Perhaps you should invest in a dictionary.
->>
->>"Jim accused CJ publicly of lying. That made it
->>public." is this statement true, rescorla? no, it is
->>not, as you agree below. did you know it was not true
->>when you posted it? yes you did.
->Mind reading again, Mr. Keegan?

not at all. you had previously admitted that you knew
cj had made the matter public prior to my response.

not only are you a liar, mr. rescorla, but when you are
exposed, you dance like the net.idiot you've been named
after.


Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran)
Subject: Re: Stranger than fiction: Simon Le Booth
Summary: It's obvious Simon hasn't read any history... 
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Keywords: You expect me to mark my deletions?  Dream on... 
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 00:07:47 GMT

In article <1992Oct14.023342.25547@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>
>Well, actually my aim is very similar to Orwell's-- I plan to depict this
>New Order Party being elected by the people out of desparation.  The people
>are so sick of one type of extremeism, they accept another form of it
>without even noticing.  Extremism breeds extremism from the other side.
>I plan to demonstrate that such system might come to power if Liberal
>extremism runs unchecked.  Ever read about how Hitler was elected??

It's painfully obvious that you don't have a fucking clue about Hitler,
the Nazi's, or anything remotly connected to history, Booth.
--
=kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu | B(0-4) c- d- e++ f- g++ k(+) m r(-) s++(+) t | TSAKC=
=My thoughts, my posts, my ideas, my responsibility, my beer, my pizza.  OK???=
=So tell me something, Kevin.  When are you planning on sending Lefty a "bill"=
=for your archiving services?  Myself and several other people want to know!!!=
Xref: sparky talk.abortion:42416 alt.activism.d:3846
From: bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ron Bense)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.activism.d
Subject: Re: Child (was: Walking down to the student center last night)
Date: 13 Oct 92 21:05:49 GMT
Reply-To: bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ronald Bense)
Followup-To: talk.abortion
Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD

In talk.abortion, chrisl@stpaul.gov (Chris A Lyman) writes:
>nadja@jetsun.weitek.COM (Nadja Adolf) writes:
]>>      child  n. 1a: an unborn or recently born human being:
]>>                 Fetus, Infant, Baby.

>> (I'm going to claim tax exemptions for each and every one of my ova.)

>I'm thinking about claiming tax exemptions for each and every one
>of my spermatazoa.  Zowie!!!

>(Of course, I'll have to come up with names for all them little critters.)

1,2,3,4,...,600000,600001,... and that's just for a couple (at most) 
of ejaculations!

Ron                          Think about this one (seen on a bumper sticker):
			     The road to hell is bumper-to-bumper
			     Make a U-turn to God.
The irony is priceless.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.politics.misc,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: IRS Admits to Brutal Dehumanizing Tactics
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 10:20:21 GMT

cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker) writes:
] >ss1@kepler.unh.edu (The Rink) writes:
] 
] >>In America an unborn child can inherit property, be named an executor, have a
] >>guardian appointed, sue for injury, file for an injunction, receive Social
] >>Security benefits, sue for a blood transfusion, obtain "equal protection" by
] >>law, and yet be denied the right to save its own life from death by abortion.
] And another note on this.  I heard a story on CNN moments ago...
] 
] Seems a Florida couple has taken Bush's "The fetus is a person" to
] heart, and have claimed (or stated their intention to claim?) their
] "unborn child" as a dependent on their tax return.  They are being
] rather (ahem) _strongly_ opposed by the IRS on this.


I have just heard on KCBS radio on the drive home from
work, this Very Same News Report, and that the IRS considers
the matter to be frivilous and that the IRS Codes clearly
define birth as the arbitrating Factor!!!!!

This Dear Innocent Young Couple now as a 3 month old Child,
and CLEARLY this was a Fetus during Tax Year 1992.

I was just SHOCK! I say it again, I was just SHOCKED!

to hear that the IRS was such a Dehumanizing Institution!!!!

And to think that George "A Kinder, Gentler America" Bush
would allow this sort of Dehumanizing Barbarity in his Regime!!!!


ciao
drieux

ps: has anyone thought what happens to the estate of
this Unborn child over which someone is Executor, or
Trustee of the Estate, if Said UnBorn Person stays Unborn.



-- 
Modern Day Problems:

Entropy, Its not Just a Good Idea,
IT's The LAW!!!!!
From: bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ron Bense)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Pro-life NRL symbolism and terminology
Date: 13 Oct 92 14:58:42 GMT
Reply-To: bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ronald Bense)
Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD

In talk.abortion, forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:

>Right to Lifers don't GET their terminology from the NRL News.
>Right to Lifers WRITE the NRL News.  They simply prefer to use their
>own terminology since they're writing for their own members anyway.

Who else would write that emotional tripe? Pro-choicers? Get real, or
at least semi-rational.

]>     But this is not what really struck me. That was the appropriateness
]> of the symbol of the NRL movement, or at least their rag. It is a flame
]> (or leaf) inside two intersecting circles.

>I believe you are referring to the ROSE, Ron.   Yes Ron, a red ROSE, the

Sorry, but if that was a rose, it was the most distorted image of a
rose I've ever seen. Then again, what's new?

...
>unwed teenage pregnancy herself, yet went to term and gave birth to the
>greatest man who ever lived.

Who the heck is this?

>> The flame/leaf symbolizes
>> life (and/or freedom, for those to whom this is important) which is
>> encircled in chains.

>This is a Rosary, Ron.  It has beads on it.  It is the chosen method of
>prayer of many pro-lifers at demonstrations.

Um, two intersecting circles as far as I know are not a rosary, but
someone will point out which of us is incorrect. There are plenty of
Catholics out there. They look like two links of a chain.

(Then again, that's appropriate for a rosary, too. :)

Ron                          Think about this one (seen on a bumper sticker):
			     The road to hell is bumper-to-bumper
			     Make a U-turn to God.
The irony is priceless.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: the Christian Tradition: Persons only after birth
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 08:20:44 GMT

bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ronald Bense) writes:
] In talk.abortion, c164-ad@po.berkeley.edu (Martin Guerrero) writes:
] 
] >Over-Generalization.  I haven't used the Bible to say human life begins at
] >conception.  Many others don't.  Some even don't believe in the Bible
] >yet they know Human Life begins at conception.
] 
] And not one has been able to provide any logical explanation for this
] stance. Their reasoning always seems to fall back on some religious
] point of view.

Ron,

Dahling... Please to remember that merely
as some Kultic Group wishes to present
that they have something LIKE a 'religious'
weltanshaung, does NOT make it one....

and I am also Glad that Martin is
willing to be honest that He does not
wish to Blaspheme Against God, and God's Word.


I can only Hope that this Means that He is
On the Road to Recovery and Salvation.

ciao
drieux


-- 
Modern Day Problems:
In any case, don't give up, just type slower :-).
Chimo
Bob.
From: cj@eno.wpd.sgi.com (C J Silverio)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: I had an abortion two days ago
Date: 7 Oct 1992 04:55:24 GMT
Organization: SGI TechPubs
Reply-To: cj@sgi.com (C J Silverio)
NNTP-Posting-Host: eno.wpd.sgi.com

---
Galen J. Hekhuis maligns the work of a great artist:
|I just put on Another Green World.  The first cut really does suck.
|Don't tell me that Brian wrote it and considers it his masterpiece...

I'll let you dislike "Sky Saw" so long as you admit that
"St Elmo's Fire" is wonderful, and that Fripp's solo is
a work of genius.

---
c j silverio
also fond of "I'll Come Running"
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Abstinence isn't effective or dirty
From: mcbeanb@brandonu.ca
Date: 12 Oct 92 20:15:43 CST
Organization: Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada

In article <1992Oct10.023042.10047@noao.edu>, forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
> From article <1992Oct8.121732.2455@brandonu.ca>, by mcbeanb@brandonu.ca:
>> Abstinence is not 100% effective.  Notnotnotnotnotnotnotnotnotnotnot.
>> Even for people other than Lisa and myself.  Even if they try it, and
>> want it to succeed, it won't necesarily happen.
>> 
>> So there.
> 
> Brian, I'm serious here.  In what way could abstinence POSSIBLY FAIL
> for you and Lisa??

I'm not sure what you're getting at here, but lemme try to answer.
Pretend Lisa and I get this crazy notion that we could abstain for
longer than half a day while we were living in the same house.
Say we actually *do* abstain...  Pretend it has lasted a *WHOLE*
*WEEK*!  By this time Lisa and I are very tense and bitch at everybody
at work, even to each other.  Zachary's constant yelling actually
becomes annoying, almost unbearable (just pretend (I'm serious too,
y'know)).  We watch a movie.  Saaaaaayyyyy... Lady and the Tramp.
We see the spaghetti scene where they kiss accidentally.  One
thing leads to another, and the week of abstinence comes to a glorious
and thankful end.  Don't worry, we'd be sure to have plenty of
emergency condoms lying around the house in case of such incidents.

Lisa and I love each other.  Lisa and I love making love to each other.
Lisa and I think having sex is one of the best ways of making love.
Lisa and I will have sex as long as we are able to.  We could try
abstinence, but it wouldn't hold out for long.  This is not a
phenomenom unique to us.  Am I making myself clear?  Did I miss
your point maybe?  If you mean that abstinence currently cannot fail
for us, then you are correct because I haven't the strength, nor the
accuracy to possibly cause my ejaculate to travel 1500 or so miles
southward, and land in the appropriate place.  That'd be a neat trick
if I could though!

Brian McBean  -  McBeanB@BrandonU.Ca
Xref: sparky talk.abortion:41438 talk.politics.misc:50384 alt.sex:32372 alt.rush-limbaugh:6897 alt.politics.elections:15695 alt.politics.clinton:9141 alt.politics.bush:8243
From: mwilson@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Mark Wilson)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.politics.misc,alt.sex,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: That Responsibility Thing, Take 2
Date: 8 Oct 92 20:49:30 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: NCR Engineering and Manufacturing Atlanta -- Atlanta, GA

In <1992Oct7.163134.17826@nwnexus.WA.COM> jbrindle@halcyon.com (Jennifer Brindle) writes:


>check up on the law.  You will have to change all of these to have it 
>your way.  Until you do, the legal definition--the only one I care about--
>stands.

Then why did you bring up the constitution.

We seem to be all agreed.  The definitions of both murder and child
are legal terms.

Myself and many others are working on just that, changing those definitions.
Thank you for acknowledging our right to try.

-- 
Mark
My opinions are mine, all mine.  Unless someone else claims them first.
Mark.Wilson@AtlantaGA.NCR.com