HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: thomasc@ms.uky.edu (Thomas Campbell)
Subject: Re: Bengals beat Bears.  was (Re: BROWNS SUCK HARD!!)
    <1992Nov9.10307.27973@ms.uky.edu> 
    <1992Nov9.194226.19673@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 06:13:37 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

In article <1992Nov9.194226.19673@babbage.ece.uc.edu> saji@hagar.ece.uc.edu (Sandeep  Aji) writes:
>
>|> alex
>|> 
>|> p.s. Boomer still sucks... Green and Pickens won the game.
>|> 
>
>   Well I do not think Boomer did too bad in the last 2 games. He is 
>   zipping the ball much better than he did few weeks back. He still has 
>   a great arm. I saw him zip the ball effortlessly for 45-50 yards 
>   during Bengals-Browns half time warmup. I mean come on ... this 
>   man has lost one of his primary receivers for the season. He is playing 
>   with a very inexperienced offensive line and most of the receivers in 
>   the Bengals line-up are playing their first season with the Bengals. 
>   (Pickens, Brennan, Query, Craig Thompson (TE) ).
>
>   He had 172 yards in yesterdays game and 3 TD's. Of which he can take credit 
>   for 2 (Craig Thompson and Carl Pickens). Agreed Pickens caught a great 
>   catch, but the ball was as perfect as it could have been. And that too after 
>   he(Boomer) was beaten up on the previous drive. The man is a fighter and 
>   if this team will go anywhere it will only be Boomer who can take them there.
Ok, *first* off (and everyone should save this cuz i"ll only say it once)
Yes, Esisason is a fighter.. If he's hurt he plays thru the pain.  It *does*
impress me.  *But*, he's still a chicken when it come to his passing and
he makes *poor* choices.  Pickens with his *fantastic* grab did that work
on the TD.  Esiason just threw it up there.  Any Soph. QB out of college
could have done that.  Esiasion doesn't throw to Pickens *nearly* enough.
He throws to this *idiot* Query.  I'm not impressed with him at all.  And
he throws to Brennan *way* too much.  He needs to throw more to Holman
who is an *excellent* player.  One of the best TE's in the business and 
to McGee who he doesn't throw to nearly enough.  Another thing he needs
to do is get away from this stupid screen pass.  He throws way too many
of them.  people say that he's a good QB and throws these long passes 
when that's *not* true.  He throws a little 5 yard pass and the Reciever
runs the rest of the way.  Ok, I'm done.. Flame Me Esiason lovers.

Alex

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: thomasc@ms.uky.edu (Thomas Campbell)
Subject: Re: Bengals beat Bears.  was (Re: BROWNS SUCK HARD!!)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 06:03:07 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

In article <BxBwns.C0q@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> whitesel@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dan Whitesell). writes:
>In article <92310.231326RK0VSANU@MIAMIU.BITNET> writes:
>weather Bengals 13-10 edge Breach.  Also Harbaugh will have bad day sacked

Man, this guy is incredible! :)  You picked the right guy to win the game.. :)
Even if you did fuck up the score and his name.. :)  (It's Breech) :)  But,
regarldess............. ONE HELL OF A GAME!!!!   

alex

p.s. Boomer still sucks... Green and Pickens won the game.

pss. I Want ot have Jim Breech's children.. :) hahahah

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dubear@molbio.cbs.umn.edu (Dubear Kroening)
Subject: Re: Dallas vs. Detroit
Organization: University of Minnesota
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 22:32:38 GMT

Detroit doesn't even use the run and shoot anymore, which is one of the 
reasons IMHO that they're doing so bad.  Additionally, there may be one 
starting offensive lineman left from last year, the rest are either injured
or no longer with us.  I can't figure out what Fontes is doing, changing the
offense and starting Rodney, but I for one think his time is up.  I don't 
think Detroit stands a chance.

Final score Detroit 10, Dallas 24

Dubear
Organization: Senior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Sat,  7 Nov 1992 00:22:24 -0500 
From: Vernon H Harmon <vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: WIZARD PREDICTIONS!!!!!!!!!!!

Excerpts from netnews.rec.sport.football.pro: 6-Nov-92 WIZARD
PREDICTIONS!!!!!!!!!!! Alvino Battistoni@andy.b (898)

> Key Matchup -               Pittsburgh at Buffalo        Buffalo by 3
>                     It sure is tough to win in Buffalo in sub-freezing
> 		temps.  Pittsburgh in spot for big let down!


No offense (and no flame) intended but just what the hell do you think
the weather is like in Pittsburgh, eh? Take my word for it: it ain't
toasty! :)

--Vernon.
From: htilney@vax.clarku.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: RE: STEELERS:  Eric Green suspended
Date: 10 Nov 92 21:57:02 GMT
Organization: Clark University

The first time a player is caught doing drugs, the league gives him some kind
of warning but does not make it public. The second time, he gets the 6-game
suspension (you can figure out which time it is for Green). After that I think
he gets suspended for a year, but I'm not sure.

Green was very apologetic in his response to the media, saying "I made a
mistake."

Well, at least we have a solid backup in Cooper. Eric Green is one of my
favorite players, but first he gets a rep for not being durable, and now
this. If anything else happens maybe they should consider trading him for
a decent WR or lineman. But I hope he gets his act together.

Bart
From: tsv@Unify.com (Tim Vannaman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Texas Stadium (was Re: Indoor vs. Outdoor (was Re: WIZARD PREDICTIONS!!!!!!!!!!!)
Date: 12 Nov 92 19:35:55 GMT
Organization: Unify Corporation (Sacramento)

In article <1992Nov10.225330.25588@u.washington.edu>, tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner) writes:
> >In article <1686@niktow.canisius.edu> bittle@niktow.canisius.edu (Jason Bittle) writes:
> >>In article <1992Nov9.162203.2306@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>, nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna) writes:
> >>
> >>> Cowboys: Indoor
> >>
> >>sorta.  It's a retractible dome, with a little slice left in the middle (so
> >>that it can never be totally closed.)  Only in Texas .. :-)
> >>
> >
> >Unless there was some quick work done between Jan. 1st (when I was
> >last home) and now, Texas Stadium is not a retractable dome.  It is a
> >"semi-dome", with a rectangular hole in the middle that is about as
> >large as the football field.  It is also not completely enclosed on
> >the side - that is, the roof sits up a few feet above the base.  
> 
> Actually, I think that has been eliminated since they put in the skyboxes.
> That is, the only hole in the stadium is on top.  Now that I think about it,
> I know this is right because I was on the top row for a game last year.  
> Anyway, this makes Texas Stadium a REALLY hot place to be in August and
> September as it basically eliminated any breeze that might have come into the 
> stadium.
> 
> >To me, it's a fun place, but you ddefinitiely do NOT get the benefit of a
> >domed stadium - it's could as hell in the winter (at least in the
> >stands).
> 
> Not quite.  When it rains, it only rains on the field and possibly the first 
> few rows.
> 
> GT
> >
> >Mark
> 
> 

They will be enclosing it in the near future.  When they got the liquor issue
passed by city hall, they said that most of that revenue would go toward enclosing
the stadium to make it more attractive for non-football activities.  He wants to
be able to book the stadium all year around. $$

Tim.
From: trradrx@canctr.mc.duke.edu (R.CLOUGH)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Scud's Back.....
Date: 11 Nov 92 21:20:11 GMT
Reply-To: trradrx@canctr.mc.duke.edu
Organization: Duke U. Med. Ctr., Durham, NC

In article <1992Nov11.193552.28159@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
>>(Can you tell I'm getting desperate for a QB?)
>I got two words for you: Steve Beurlein.

**sigh** I was hoping no one would mention this terrible mistake.  He really
deserved a good long look.

>Lyle Alzado.  How exactly did they get him?

Hmmm.  It didn't take much, as Cleveland had no use for him.  I don't remember
specifics, but they didn't give up much to get him.  
  What is it with these ex-Raiders DL who become actors and die? First the
Tooz and then Lyle.  I hope Ben Davidson is taking care of himself.

>>"Next to Keith Richards, Sacramento looks great."--Pete Vecsey, on the Kings'
>Three and oh, baby, three and oh.  Better than Vecsey ever was.

Hey, I **like** the way Keith looks!
	Robert Clough, DUMC (though still not speaking for them)
"Next to Keith Richards, Sacramento looks great."--Pete Vecsey, on the Kings'
  chances this year.
From: kenb@ssec.wisc.edu (Ken 'TEX' Bywaters)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Vikings game
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:57:12 GMT
Article-I.D.: daffy.1992Nov9.185712.6542
Organization: Space Sci. and Eng. Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison

In article <hatfield.721271999@s6.math.umn.edu> hatfield@s6.math.umn.edu (Gary Hatfield) writes:
>mjb10@po.CWRU.Edu (Michael J. Bumbulis) writes:
>
>
>
>
>>I heard the Vikings are now 7-2 after beating Tampa Bay 35-7.
>>Did anyone see this game?  If so, could you post your impressions
>>about it?
>
>>  
>>-- 
>>Michael              
>>                           Liberty is the right to tell people
>>                           what they do not want to hear.
>>                           [George Orwell]  
>	It was never close!  The Vikings line(both sides of the ball) dominated
>the game.  Terry Allen and Roger Craig had great days rushing and Gannon had 
>another decent day passing.  I may be biased but THE VIKES ARE NO FLUKE!
>Houston is dead meat.
>			
> 
   I agree that the Vikings do not seem to be a fluke.  I was surprised to
see that TB actually outgained Minnesota something like 360 - 295 yds.  Why
was this?  Did TB get a lot of trash yards towards the end of the game?

I also noticed today that the NFC Central has a 2-9 record in the NFC outside
of their division.  That compares to a 9-4 record by the NFC East.  Any doubt
as to the toughest division in football?

On a side note:  when was the last time an AFC team won a SB?  It seems to me
it was 1983, but that's where my memory fails me.

-Ken Bywaters

p.s.  Go Dallas!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: THE Matchup in Week 12 (was A Question)
Keywords: tiguzz
Date: 10 Nov 92 23:39:44 GMT
Organization: .

Ralph Kennedy writes:
>     I have a question.  Do the other teams in the
>NFC West have any respect for the Los Angels Rams?

No.




...Just kidding Ralphie boy!!  The Saints obviously do respect the Rams, 
winning narrowly 13-10 at the Dome. (Then again, if you count every game 
the Saints win by a FG or less, then N.O. respects more teams than Wally 
Cleaver does girls.)  I would respect the Rams a lot more if they'd
start my buddy Todd Kinchen (3rd round split end).


On to the matchup of the week:  Nawlins at SanFran.

  -- Contrary to what was earlier stated on the net, the Saints LOVE
	playing on natural grass, especially our RB's.  Don't confuse a 
	city-owned dome facility with what football was meant to be played on.
	The much improved Saints OL (and that's saying a lot) has a chance 
	to continue Hilliard's resurgence this week.

  -- A big key to Hilliard's (and Dunbar's) success is Hebert, of
	course.  If he can throw SF a curve early and try to establish
	the PASS against the Niner secondary, good things could happen for the
	backfield.  The Saints have genuinely been testing the limits of their
	ultra-conservative style lately.  Eric Martin is still the go-to 
	guy on 3rd down, but I look to Quinn Early to be a MAJOR factor in 
	determining New Orleans' success Sunday.

  -- Steve Young is the biggest factor.  I, as a diehard Saints fan,
	would rather see TOAST (Montana) starting Sunday.  Young is, IMHO, the
	premier QB in the NFL going into week 12 (he's my FFL QB!).  He is a 
	killer on 3rd downs especially.  The Saints should try to mirror him 
	with Sam "the field mouse" Mills in an effort to thwart this
	heartbreaking scrambling crap.  

  -- The N.O. Dee always plays Young & Co. tough, but it is usually all 
	for naught -- thanks to our inconsistent offense (or is that offence).  
	If Hebert can continue to hit the mid to long-range ball, we
	could be setting pretty for the upset.


Any other comment?!?!?  I certainly hope so.  I can't stand a week of
scanning through hundreds of witty 'Fish N Chips' bile-spewing posts.
(Can we do away with these?  And while we're at it, can we do away with
game summaries?  :)  :)


--J.J.Clyde, a Saints fan who thinks Rypien is overrated.
Organization: Freshman, MCS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Fri,  6 Nov 1992 15:48:07 -0500 
From: Erik Karl Witte <ew2r+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Question?
Distribution: world,local

On 05-Nov-92 in Question?                    
user BENVENGA MARK J@mcvax4.d writes:
> Can someone please answer this question, it has always
> bothered me.  Whenever a lineman on either offense or 
> defense put his hands on the helmet or mask of the opponent,
> an ...ILLEGAL USE OF HANDS PENALTY, HANDS TO THE FACE...
> is called, usually a 10 yard penalty.  However, if a
> receiver or runningback running with the ball stiff arms
> a tackler in the head, that is OK.  Is this some type of
> double standard?

No.  It becomes illegal if the RB grabs a face mask or puts his had in
the tackler's face, etc.  It is rarely called because it occurs far less
frequently than the opposite (why, I can't say).
From: bd001b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (bimal ajit desai)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: re: schmidt's comp. rankings
Date: 10 Nov 92 03:22:48 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

How on earth could any ranking system place the Eagles atop the NFL after
last weeks loss in Dallas? I mean, I am as die-hard an Eagles fan as there
is, but as an informed follower of the NFL, I can't understand how a 5-3
team could possibly be ranked above a 7-1 team that had just beaten them the
previous week. There is no question the Eagles have played one of the
toughest schedules in the NFL (N.O., Washington, Dallas twice, Kansas City
and Phoenix twice) but Dallas has also played a difficult schedule (the
Eagles twice, Kansas City, Washington, New York, L.A. Raiders). Given the
fact that Dallas and the Eagles split their games and that Dallas beat the
Chiefs (whom the Eagles lost to), I think Dallas has to be number one (even
though I hate to admit it). I enjoy looking at the ranking, but I have to
wonder what criteria your program is using.
                                -Sports Maniac
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: fredg@ariel.yorku.ca (Fredrick Gonsalves)
Subject: BILLS #1
Originator: fredg@a02.ariel.yorku.ca
Organization: York University, Toronto, Canada
Distribution: york
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 21:43:12 GMT




ARE YOU READY TO ROCK
ARE YOU READY TO ROLL
ARE YOU READY FOR KELLY, THOMAS, REED AND THEIR BANG-BANG SHOW
THE BILLS WILL KICK THE STEELERS SUNDAY NIGHT
THE SCORE WILL BE 21-41 THAT'S RIGHT!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


FredG
YorkU, Canada
From: trottibw@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu(Barry Trottier)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: JGH computer rankings
Date: 12 Nov 1992 09:17:25 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
Reply-To: trottibw@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: purple.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

In article <1992Nov11.164053.15434@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN  
HEIM	) writes:
> Week 11: No change in top 7.  (Steeler fans are not going to be 
> happy.)
>                             Last
> Rank   Team         Rating  Week
>  1     Cowboys        90     1
>  2     Eagles         84     2
>  3     Saints         82     3
>  4     Vikings        80     4
>  5     49ers          79     5

[From another article by same poster.]
>Saints     at   49ers         3


Interesting, your system rates the Saints higher, but pickes San Francisco to  
win?

-------------
Go Niners!
Go Elway!

Barry Trottier
e-mai:  trottibw@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
From: edquist@eng.umd.edu (Karl T. Edquist)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 70s Defensive Linesmen
Date: 5 Nov 92 17:51:01 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity von Uniland, College Park
Originator: edquist@valkyrie.eng.umd.edu


In article <1992Nov4.184253.519@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
>satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
>>In contrast, offensive players
>>like O.J. Simpson and Joe Namath look pretty good.  
>
>A very bad example, Sat.  Namath may look good, but his knees
>are totally shot.  He lives in pain and can hardly walk.
>
>
>--Gidi
>
>
>

I even think Joe was recently fitted with fake (plastic?) knees because his own
were in such bad shape.


Karl
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: st1ge@Rosie.UH.EDU (Edward Hui)
Subject: Re: 49ers Kick ASS AGAIN!
Reply-To: st1ge@Rosie.UH.EDU
Organization: University of Houston
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:10:54 GMT

In article <1drvd6INNul@morrow.stanford.edu>, GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold) writes:

[stuffs deleted]

>The only reason why they put those numbers up was because of the
>soft defense that the Niners played in order to keep the clock
>running.
>Come to think about it, the main reason why the Niners "D" has such
>a poor statistical rating is because of the leads they build up
>early in a game, forcing them to adapt a soft defense, thus giving
>up those passing yards. Granted they have been burned a few times!
>
>                                                   Tony
>                                                GO 49ERS!!!
     That's part of the reason.  But I rememberred that in the last few
years, their defense would not give up a lot of passing yards even with
a big lead, and their pass rush was also much better.  That's why their
defense is always ranked in the top 10.
  
Edward Hui
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jmartin@ntmtv.UUCP (Jeff Martin)
Subject: Re: Cowboy Bandwagon
Originator: jmartin@eratos
Organization: Northern Telecom Incorporated
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 01:07:47 GMT

From article <2790@devnull.mpd.tandem.com>, by dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch):
	[ much non-sense deleted ]
>Let's face reality, they are very overrated and will choke
>come playoff time!!
>
>		Go Jim McMahon and the Eagles!!!

	Talk about bandwagon jumping/fair weather fandom!  Your once future
	Hall of famer has an off month and the city jumps (a sinking) ship.

Jeff Martin
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gogo@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (donald.gogolin)
Subject: Re: Cleveland stinx
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Distribution: bl
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 18:06:59 GMT

In article <25594@optima.cs.arizona.edu>, dkl@cs.arizona.edu (David K. Lowenthal) writes:
> In article <1992Nov2.170100.29264@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
> 
> You are right, the Browns fans would have babbled on and on.  But we Bengal
> fans are silent because we recognize that our team is in serious rebuilding
> phase.  It will be awhile before the Bengals get back to the playoffs.
> We don't claim we are going to the playoffs like the Brownies' fans.

Looking at the schedule the Browns have, they had a realistic shot at 
getting into the playoffs.  However, losing to the more anemic teams in 
the league took care of that.  The Browns are another year or two away
from being serious contenders.  Any REAL Browns fan recognizes that.
The Bengals on the other hand are still spiralling.  Whether this game
was a fluke or not will be seen shortly.  On Sunday, the better team won.
Next week, it's another ball game.

> 
> Also, if the Browns were any good we might get a bit excited.  They are
> pathetic.  Real smart, drafting Vardell.  They have sure got the big
> fullback market cornered, even though they have no offensive linemen to
> speak of.

Vardell is a work horse and compliments the Browns style of play.
Browns' fans have no complaints about this move.  
Besides, people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones!

> 
> And no Bernie excuses.  Bernie didn't cause Mack and Vardell to get stuffed
> at the goal line before half.  They would have lost with or without him.
> 
Mack got stuffed!  Vardell?  Very questionable at best!


The Bengals played extremely well.  The Browns have the unique ability
to make the Bengals look a lot better than they are.   Don't get 
accustom to it!
From: elm@cs.berkeley.edu (ethan miller)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: betting on football in vegas
Date: 11 Nov 92 15:21:56
Organization: Berkeley--Shaken, not Stirred
Distribution: world
Reply-To: elm@cs.berkeley.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: terrorism.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: arth@sudshead.EBay.Sun.COM's message of 11 Nov 1992 17:34:34 GMT

In article <1drg7aINNqlj@male.EBay.Sun.COM> arth@sudshead.EBay.Sun.COM writes:
=>The last two weeks any team that was an underdog by 10 or more
=>covered.  I'm taking Rams, detroit and seattle in a 3 way parlay.

You should pay more attention.  The last line I saw had Seattle +12
against the Redskins.  They lost by 13, and didn't cover.

ethan
--
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
ethan miller--cs grad student   | "Anybody not wearing 2000000 sunblock's
elm@cs.berkeley.edu             |  gonna have a REALLY bad day.  GET IT?"
#include <std/disclaimer.h>     |  -- Sarah Connor, _Terminator 2_
From: newson@sequent.com (Newson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Deion, Deion, Deion
Date: 10 Nov 92 17:03:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: sequent.1992Nov10.170326.19828
Distribution: na
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc.

In article <BxICqp.Aw7@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> brown@venus.iucf.indiana.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov9.200005.21562@ccd.harris.com>, bdb@controls.ccd.harris.com (Bill D. Buckalew) writes...
>> 
>>Does anyone know if Deion is expected to play tonight?  Look for 
>>J. Rice to have less than 3 receptions and under 25 yards if Prime
>>Time plays, and the Falcons to stomp the 'niners at home 
>>in the dome.
>> 
>>"Elvis lives" -- Jerry Glanville
>
>    N    N      OOO    TTTTTTT   !       Ha, Ha Neon Dion, Prime Time
>    NN   N     O   O      T      !       SUCKED last night!!! So did
>    N N  N     O   O      T      !       his butt buddy Andre Rison!!
>    N  N N     O   O      T      !
>    N   NN     O   O      T              41 - 3  Ha, Ha Ha !!!!!!!!!!!
>    N    N      OOO       T      !
>                                                                B**2

This kind of response is what frustrates me the most about this net. Yes the
ball bounced the 49ers way, and I love it but replies like the above are 
uncalled for. There is no need to piss off everybody on the net. It would be
nice to see resaonable posts for once instead of this adolescent bullshit.

Don Newson
Sequent Computer Systems
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro