HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Apparently-To: win3-l%uicvm.bitnet@pucc.princeton.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 11 Nov 1992 07:28:51 PST
From:         "Robert Stadler, DEC Munich,
              Tel: 49-89-9591-3977 11-Nov-1992 1624"
              <rstadler@RTOEU.ENET.DEC.COM>
Subject:      A: WIN NT Forum ?

	Hi all,

does anybody know about a conference dealing with Windows NT and/or
WIN32 ?

And, where to find it ?

Thanx in advance,
best regards,

Robert Stadler
From: A16905@ITESO.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Corel
Date: 9 Nov 92 17:23:10 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

Hi,

If anyone knows an Internet/Bitnet address where I can reach Corel (the
makers of CorelDraw!), please drop a line.

Shalom,
Memo.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sun, 8 Nov 1992 21:52:19 -0400
From:         Norm Parry <NPARRY@COLGATEU.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: "NEW TO INTERNET/BITNET"

Richard Smith, et. al., are doing the Navigating the Internet again starting
Nov. 16.  It's a great introduction to the basics and beyond.

To subscribe (it is free) send email to

LISTSERV@UBVM.bitnet

Subscribe Navigating [your full name]


Good luck.

nparry@colgateu.bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:10:08 EDT
From:         Cloves Ferreira Junior <cfj@DI.UFPE.BR>
Subject:      RE: Invalid filemode????

> Anything .tar is in a special compression like .zip.  I don't know how to
>'un-tar' it though.

>       Doug (dwilliams@vax86.liuvax.edu)

To 'un-tar' go to a Unix estation and use the tar command: tar xvf file.tar

  Cloves.
From: 868liew@gw.wmich.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: HELP!!! FaxModem Problems...
Date: 7 Nov 92 04:07:05 EST
Organization: Western Michigan University

	I finaly get rid of my slow 2400bps FaxModem. UPS just shiped my
new Infotel 14400 bps send/receive Fax Modem today. The trouble starts!!
	I try to use back my old  "Winfax v2.0" (which came along with
the old Faxmodem) . But I only manage to send  Faxes and can't receive
any fax. It can autoanswer the incoming fax and I can heard the tone sounded
by the modem. But few seconds later, It automatically cut of the line and 
return the massage "No response from modem". 
        Can someone out there tell me what is going on?
       
        Is there a problem with my new modem?
        Is Winfax V2.0 doesn't compatible with my new modem(group 3) ?
       What do you all suggest me to do? ?(please don't tell me to use back my
                                          old modem.)

        Your help is much much appreciated !!
        Thanks in advance.

Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 5 Nov 1992 13:57:46 CST
From:         Thomas Jones <C6321003@UMVMA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: pc-tools and commute
              5 Nov 1992 17:04:02 EST from <davidl@FELIX.ASYNC.VT.EDU>

On Thu, 5 Nov 1992 17:04:02 EST David Leslie said:
>>  >I have pc-tools commute that enables 2 computers to (among other thing)
>>  >send files to one another.  the software has settings for up to 115,00(
>>  >or so) baud.  I can't get it to work for over 19,200 baud.  I am transering
>>  >between a ps/2 model 55sx, and a 35sx.  Any hints or comments that coud
>>  >save my day?  Thanks for your support!! :-)
>>
>> Your problem is that the 55sx and 35sx serial ports are limited to the
>> 19,200 baud.  It's a hardware limitation, not the software.  To get the
>> higher speeds you either need a clone with a 16550C UART on the serial
>> card or for a "real" IBM you need a Model 90 or better with the direct
>> DMA serial transfer that will work up to 345 Kbaud...
>>
>
>I disagree... I have a ps/2 50Z and my roommate and I have our computers
>hooked up together at 38400.  So I don't think that its the hardware.
>

What software and hardware are you using for your connection?  If it's
something like Procomm 2.01 with a direct connection link (or through a
modem with a compression protocol like v.42, etc) you might be able to get
faster than 19.2 kbaud...  Or possible your settings are for 38400 but it's
really communicating at 19200.  The 19200 speed is out of a hardware reference
manual which I've found to be pretty accurate but it could (or I could!) be
wrong...
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 11 Nov 1992 10:03:00 EST
From:         Vince Scarafino <Scarafino@MULTICS-A.PMS.FORD.COM>
Subject:      Re: HEAP size

 >Date:  6 November 1992 20:08 est
 >From:  Bryan K. Ward <BRYAN at SRC.SBS.UTAH.EDU>
 >Subject:  Re: HEAP size

 >>   According to page 251 of the WINDOWS RESOURCE KIT
 >>   heap size is "crippled" to 64K maximum.  MS suggests
 >>   you let application vendor know about any problems
 >>   with GDI "overindulgers".
 >>   I know that, that wasn't any help, but it is what MS
 >>   suggests.
 >>
 >>                     Howard Blakesley
 >>
 >>     hblake.nnomed (BITNET)  hblake@nomvs.lsumc.edu (INTERNET)
 >
 >This sounds an awful lot like the 640K barrier in DOS that windows was
 >supposed to help overcome (workaround)!  This really P_____ me off!  I think
 >we need to revolt against Microsoft!  (Unfortunately they have a grip on the
 >market like an iron fist and no one has the resources to put forward a
 >product to break the grip!).
 >
 >MY VIEWS ARE MY OWN.
 >
 >Bryan K. Ward                               Phone: (801) 581-6491
 >Survey Research Center                      internet address:
 >University of Utah                               bryan@src.sbs.utah.edu
 >2120 Annex Bldg.
 >Salt Lake City, UT  84112

You can drop this stuff and go to IBM's System/370 virtual memory and
have a 16MB address limitation for some stuff, even though the total
address space is 2GB.  I'm afraid you'll find what seems to be
unreasonable resource limitations for some stuff in every environment.

Leave it to IBM (and now Microsoft) to invent a virtual resource and
then run out of it!

Vince
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:         UK.AC.LIV.UXB; 12 NOV 92  9:03:05 GMT
X-Mailer:    ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 12 Nov 1992 09:05:26 GMT
From:         "Mr. R. Coates" <roysan@UXB.LIV.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: Make a Wish Foundation

>
>
> I received a copy of a letter that I would like to share with the
> users on this list.
>
> >       Craig Shergold is a seven-year old in Atlanta, Georgia, who
> >       is suffering from terminal cancer.  It is one of Craig's
> >       ambitions to be included in the Guiness Book of World Records
> >       for having the largest number of business cards ever collected
> >       by one person.
> >
> >       Craig would be grateful if you could send one of your business
> >       cards to the address below...  Obviously, speed is of the
> >       essence.
> >
>
> I hope you can find it in your heart to help Craig meet his goal by
> sending your business card.  Also, please share this with your
> colleagues, friends, and other list_servers.
>
> Thank you!...Jonathan C. Washam

What a sad and cynical world we live in... We had an _identical_ plea here
in Liverpool UK about three weeks ago. The address to send your card looked
perfectly genuine, and the stated cause is one that none of us could refuse.

Sadly, the whole thing was a scam designed to accumulate names of possible
burglary/holdup targets since many banking institutions were also targetted.

Whilst I would do almost anything for a worthwhile cause, I am wary from
recent experience - look before you leap.

--

Roy.


==============================================================================
                                  Roy Coates
                   Dept of Mech Eng. Liverpool University
                       P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX

roysan@uxb.liverpool.ac.uk    Tel: 051-794-4862             Fax: 051-794-4848
=============================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 4 Nov 1992 20:49:02 CET
From:         Espen Haakonsen <FGL92016@NOBIVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: A Windows Trouble-Shooting hint
              4 Nov 1992 08:44:00 EDT from <adkins@CAER.UKY.EDU>

Hi....

Try starting Windows with the /b option.  Windows will then generate a file
describing all the steps in the windows startup.(I think the file is
called BOOTLOG.TXT). Trace the file to see what went wrong during startup.


Espen H}konsen
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: VAXF::IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: MARK
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 9 Nov 1992 08:37:26 -0700
From:         MARK@OJC.COLORADO.EDU
Subject:      Re: Will Win/WorkGroups work without a network operating sy

>Could I set up two PCs, each with Win for WG and have them interact over
>an ethernet network without any "network operating system" anywhere?
>I.e., without Lan Manager, without Novell, without any 3rd machine as a
>network manager or server?  If so, can they talk to each other with
>TCP/IP? What kind of packets are used?
>

I went to one of those demonstrations that Microsoft put on in Denver
a couple of months ago dealing with workgroups/windows...  They said
that no networking software is required, but it will work with existing
network software.  I think they mentioned that windows/workgroups has
trouble on subsets of full-blown network operating systems (ie Netware
Lite, etc...)

Hope this helps..

        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        ~       Mark Allen              | Internet: MARK@OJC.COLORADO.EDU ~
        ~       Computer Programmer B   | DECNET:   OJC::MARK             ~
        ~                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        ~       Otero Junior College                                      ~
        ~       La Junta, CO 81050              Curiosity killed the cat, ~
        ~       (719) 384-6830                  but for a while there I   ~
        ~                                       was the suspect.          ~
        ~                                               - Steven Wright   ~
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 13 Nov 1992 10:30:19 DNT
From:         "Hans D. Jensen" <DFMHDJ@VM.UNI-C.DK>
Subject:      Re: Problem with TDW

Try looking in the mirrors/msdos/borland directory of wuarchive.wustl.edu
I found my files there. E.g. check TPWN31.ZIP and its contents.

Hans D. Jensen
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 10 Nov 1992 13:17:53 CST
From:         A16905@ITESO.BITNET
Subject:      Problem with TDW

Stephen Jackson said that the problem was with the Debugger DLL, that I
need one specific to my video driver. Where can I find this thing ?

I have only FTP access (no COMPUSERVE, BBS, or similar).

He said he downloaded it from Borland BBS. Is there a way to dial up to
that BBS from the Internet ?

Stephen, Can you send the TDW.INI file later ?

Shalom,
Memo.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 11 Nov 1992 12:16:42 CET
From:         Joern-Morten Innselset <VEI92001@NOBIVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Searching in Archie

Hei Espen!

Login as ARCHIE... That should do it| Use PROG XXXX.XXX to search for progs.

Yours, Morten.
From: DAVISPE@PENTAGON-HQDADSS.ARMY.MIL
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Windows Programmer's Journal
Date: 12 Nov 92 19:22:45 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU


  Well, in only a few hours the response to the idea for the Windows
Programmer's Journal has been incredible. (By the way, unless someone is
aware of a copyright infringement by using that name, that's what it will
be called.) Anyway, I guess it's a go... What I need now is articles for
the first issue. Several people have shown an interest in that area, but
the more voices the better.

  I will be going on vacation tomorrow and will be out of touch for about
a week. In that time I will start writing my own articles and preparing
the format for the Journal itself. I plan on releasing the journal in
several ways. First of all, I want to make it available from anonymous
FTP on several internet sites. If anyone wants to carry it on a BITNET
list, that would be terrific. I'd appreciate it if someone could get it
out on Fido-net and any other PC BBS networks out there.

  Anyway, this is a call for articles. PLEASE submit anything.

  I had some questions about what topics would be valid. Just about anything
relating to Microsoft Windows works. I want to cover everything from
Windows 3.0 to Windows NT to Windows for Workgroups, etc... Everything
from Turbo C++ to Windows to Microsoft C to Turbo Pascal for Windows is good.

  Here are some suggested topics for starters, and if you have your own
ideas, feel free to send them in. When I was editor of the Pascal Newsletter,
I'm happy to say I never turned down an article and the newsletter never
suffered because of it, so don't hesitate because you don't think it will
get in.

Ideas:
 *Windows NT and Windows for Workgroups network programs.
 *A multi-issue tutorial for Windows/C++ beginners.
 *Turbo Pascal for Windows programming.
 *Writing communications software in Windows
 *Writing DDE and/or OLE programs in Windows (Especially manipulating
  program groups via DDE with Program Manager.)
 *Special considerations in writing DLLs. (How to avoid problems of
  SS!=DS and how to work around the limitation.)
 *Special cosiderations when writing multi-data segment and/or multi-code
  segment applications.

  Get your ideas and articles to me. As before, please send all correspondance
  to:
    HJ647C at GWUVM.BITNET     or    HJ647C at GWUVM.GWU.EDU

  I look forward to seeing your contributions. Also, if anyone can spread
the word on other appropriate lists or newsgroups and try to get others
to contribute, it can only help in making the first issue that much bigger
and better.
  Thanks to all that have responded so far and I look forward to hearing
from others. I hope to have the first issue ready by early December, so get
those articles in.
                                                  _Pete Davis
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 12 Nov 1992 20:37:00 PDT
From:         HLIN@SCU.BITNET
Subject:      Re: DesqJet 550C

Is there anyone knows what's the list server address for win32-nt group?
Thanks a lot.
.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Acknowledge-To: <U2347@WVNVM>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 9 Nov 1992 13:51:56 EST
From:         "Thomas L. Blaskovics" <U2347@WVNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      TV

This Sunday I watch Computer Chronicles on our PBS.  They showed a TV card
for the Windows envirnoment.  The demo was impressive but then most of the
things demonstrated on Computer Chronicles "works" (The joys of video tape)
I am interested in the card and it costs and anybody who has had experience
with the hardware on 486 machines.
I'll summarize if their is anything to say.

 Thanks,
 Tom Blaskovics
 U2347@WVNVM            BITNET   Address
 U2347@WVNVM.WVNET.EDU  INTERNET Address
 What I think and say is not attributable to anybody else
From: PRAETHE@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (Ethan Evan Prater)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: Disk Label Utility.
Date: 5 Nov 92 04:26:36 GMT
Organization: Yale University

In article <WIN3-L%92110411402081@UICVM.BITNET>
"Mr. Wayne O Estep" <westep@STL-07SIMA.ARMY.MIL> writes:
 
>  Does anyone know of a good, easy to use, utility that will display then
>print labels for diskettes (FROM WINDOWS)?  The output perfered is on
>standard paper/printer.
 
If you have Word for Windows 2.0, just use the MAILLABL.DOT template. It
formats and prints almost any kind of label, including diskette labels,
assuming the ones you want to print are in the standard Avery format/size.
 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ethan Evan Prater              |
                               | "The sign of Eth is rising in the air..."
prater@minerva.cis.yale.edu    |
praethe@yalevm.ycc.yale.edu    |      -- Rush -- By-Tor and the Snow Dog --
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 4 Nov 1992 11:06:45 CST
From:         Don Branson <C08922DB@WUVMD.BITNET>
Subject:      Linking graphics in W4W 2.0

The manual for Word for Windows 2.0 claims that by LINKing to a file,
the other file is not included in the current file.  However, when I
try to link to a graphics file (.EPS), the file size grows by more
than the size of the graphic.  The graphic is a logo, about 38K,
and I certainly don't want 200 copies of this file spread all over
my drives, whether LINKed or EMBEDed, because of disk space.

How can this problem be avoided?

Don Branson
Washington University Information Systems
St. Louis, Missouri
BITNET Mail  : C08922DB@WUVMD
Internet Mail: C08922DB@WUVMD.Wustl.Edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 6 Nov 1992 22:54:27 EST
From:         "Joseph T. Malloy" <jmalloy@ITSMAIL1.HAMILTON.EDU>
Subject:      Re: HEAP size
              at Nov 6, 92 6:08 pm

>
> >   According to page 251 of the WINDOWS RESOURCE KIT
> >   heap size is "crippled" to 64K maximum.  MS suggests
> >   you let application vendor know about any problems
> >   with GDI "overindulgers".
> >   I know that, that wasn't any help, but it is what MS
> >   suggests.
> >
> >     hblake.nnomed (BITNET)  hblake@nomvs.lsumc.edu (INTERNET)
>
> This sounds an awful lot like the 640K barrier in DOS that windows was
> supposed to help overcome (workaround)!  This really P_____ me off!  I think
> we need to revolt against Microsoft!  (Unfortunately they have a grip on the
> market like an iron fist and no one has the resources to put forward a
> product to break the grip!).
>
> MY VIEWS ARE MY OWN.
>
> Bryan K. Ward                               Phone: (801) 581-6491

Admittedly, it would/will be nice if/when Windows is constrained only by
physical and virtual memory, not by logical though arbitrary heap sizes.
OTOH, let's be reasonable: I can open Word for Windows 2.0a or Word
Perfect 5.1 for Win, as well as Excel 4, Procomm Plus for Windows, and a
bunch of utilities (some even in dos windows) and still have over 50% in
resources left (I have about 100 True Type fonts, by the way).  I can
quickly switch between these things, they all multitask quite happily,
too.  I think the real answer is to encourage software houses to write
snappier, more efficient code.  Is there really all that much that
Quattro Pro for Windows can do that Excel can't?  If so, is it worth the
resources it gobbles up?

If it's any consolation, Word Perfect for Window's first iteration was a
resource hog, too; the subsequent update fixed that some.  Perhaps the
same will be true of Quattro for Windows.

Joe
jmalloy@hamilton.edu
From: RVD1@C53000.PETROBRAS.ANRJ.BR (Celso Nardi)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: *.wav files needed
Date: 9 Nov 92 15:37:25 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: win3-l@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: PSI%11182594::IN%"win3-l@uicvm.bitnet"
Comments:     @FPSP.FAPESP.BR - @FPSP.HEPNET - @BRFAPESP.BITNET - .BR gateway

Hi there everybody!

I'm new at this list, and I have heard the news about the speak.exe, so I got it
and that's really great!

But... I don't have ftp access to the internet/bitnet, so I'll be very happy if
any of you net-win-maniacs could send me some *.wav files, because I'd like to
use it with the speaker drive...

Colud anybody send me that?

If you could, uuencode that and send me...

Thanks,

Celso.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%"win3-l@uicvm"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 4 Nov 1992 21:38:00 CDT
From:         "MAK, TIN LUN" <ETMAX@TTACS.BITNET>
Subject:      HELP ON SECURITY

Hello fellow subscribers,

        Sorry to bother the newsgroup again.  I need some help on securing
Windows 3.1 so that no users can get to the DOS prompt or exit the Windows
environment without hitting the Alt-Ctrl-Del combination.  I remembered a while
back that there was a similar discussion on the same subject and I remembered
that certain things can be done in the system.ini file so that the Windows
environment will be unbreakable.  I had a printout but then I did the most
stupid thing, I cleaned my apartment and threw away that particular log.  So if
any administrator out there would be so kind to lend me a helping hand, I would
really appreciated it.  Oh, and also my boss, too.

        I am asking this because we are to set up a lab full (23) of 486-50 that
runs only Windows.  That's why we need to know if there is anyway to do such
thing.  I remembered the discussion and been through my entire stock of
printouts but came out empty handed.  Please, please, please, please give us
some help!

        Thanks in advance.

                                                        Max
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: M_RICHARDS
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 6 Nov 1992 15:36:00 EST
From:         M_RICHARDS@UTOROISE.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Windows Labs summary; PLUS for Windows questions

Could you please supply a telephone no. for Canadian callers?
I would very much like evaluation copies.

Thanks...
Margaret Richards
Microcomputer Coordinator
O.I.S.E.
M_Richards@OISE1.OISE.ON.CA
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:         UK.AC.LIV.UXB;  5 NOV 92 11:19:06 GMT
X-Mailer:    ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 5 Nov 1992 11:19:31 GMT
From:         "Mr. R. Coates" <roysan@UXB.LIV.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: W4W: Problem resetting defaults for "Normal" style
              92 6:36 pm

>
>
> I ran W4W without a document (as it is when you start up) and chose
> the Style option in the Format pulldown.  I then chose Character
> and specified that I wanted my font to be Palatino and the size of
> the font to be 12.  I then selected the Use as Default option and
> selected the Yes button when asked whether I really wanted to change
> the Normal style.  I then backed all the way out of W4W (and every-
> thing else) to my desktop and reselected W4W.  Once it was fired up,
> the proper font and size were okay at the top of the screen.

Ahhh... I too have suffered this problem for some time and W4W also
loses the page size/margins setup as well.

--

Roy.


==============================================================================
                                  Roy Coates
                   Dept of Mech Eng. Liverpool University
                       P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX

roysan@uxb.liverpool.ac.uk    Tel: 051-794-4862             Fax: 051-794-4848
=============================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU