HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: amay3@mach1.wlu.ca (andrew may)
Subject: Re: Needs of the Many...
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Organization: Wilfrid Laurier University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 15:04:14 GMT
Keywords: Spock

The movie was Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan
The test was the: Kobayashi Maru
Spock said those lines after the Enterprise had gone out for her training
cruise with a bunch of cadets on board, and they heard about a problem at
Rugala I. Kirk asked for command from Spock and Spock said the phrase in
question.

*****************************************************************************
* Andrew May             - "Do you want me to sit in a corner and rust,     *
*  amay3@mach1.wlu.ca       or just fall apart where I'm standing?"         *
*****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: kelsey@redwing.SLAC.Stanford.EDU (Mike Kelsey)
Subject: Re: Rascals: 40% drop in transported mass
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:31:19 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.105626.2427@vax1.mankato.msus.edu>, gunthar@vax1.mankato.msus.edu writes:
|> When the transporter cheif stated, at the begining of the episode, that one of 
|> the occupants of the shuttle may have been lost because of an observed 40%
|> decrease in the transported mass, did anyone else do a quick bit of mental
|> arithmatic and say "Hum, must have been Guianan they lost." :)
|> 
|> G.

Only because Riker wasn't there :-) :-)
						-- Mike Kelsey
|> -----
|> "Crayons can take you places a starship can't."
|> 
-- 
[  My opinions are not endorsed by SLAC, Caltech, or the US government  ]
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.  Attack ships on fire off
the shoulder  of Orion.   I've watched  C-beams glitter in  the darkness
near the Tannhauser Gate.  All these memories will be lost in time, like
tears in the rain."  -- Roy Batty
From: lis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Elisabeth Riba)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Sirtis' height
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:00:45 GMT
Organization: Brandeis University

ph9991_manfr@rivers.acc.uwrf.edu writes:


>Minor spoiler for "Rascals" ahead


>This was scary, but compare the heights of the kid Picard and Troi
>when they are talking in his quarters....
>Picard was taller!    

>Marina Sirtis is _very_ definitely _very_ short.
I've heard she's about 5'2" or so.  Also, Kid Picard was a tall
kid--he was almost as tall as Gates, as well.
-- 
--------------->Elisabeth Anne Riba * lis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu<---------------
"The problem with cats is that they have the same stare for moths that they 
 have for axe murderers.  So I never know whether to expect a hole in my
 clothing or a hole in my head."  --Paula Poundstone
From: hermit@dastari.uucp (Mark Buda)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Minimal review of "Rascals" and preview for "A Fistful of Datas"
Date: 4 Nov 92 18:50:27 GMT
Reply-To: hermit%dastari.uucp@devon.lns.pa.us
Organization: Avalon Computing

Spoilers for "Rascals" ahead.

Bleah. If you can accept the basic premise (which I think will be
ripped to shreds on the net) then you might be amused by bits of it.
It wasn't even something I could get up the energy to dislike, it was
just there, annoying me.

Spoilers for "A Fistful of Datas" ahead.

If they can avoid the Stupid Holodeck Episode Syndrome, this could be
really good. If they can't, this could be really bad.
--
Mark Buda

I get my monkeys for nothing and my chimps for free.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
id <m0mosGE-0000wFC@crash.cts.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 92 01: 51 PST
	id AA24846; Mon, 9 Nov 92 14: 37:09 EST
	id AA14086 for ncrats!ncr-sd!crash!rec-arts-startrek-current; Mon, 9 Nov 92 14: 35:19 EST
	id AA23836; Mon, 9 Nov 92 13: 35:10 -0600
	id AA15667; Mon, 9 Nov 92 13: 35:30 -0600
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA13541; Mon, 9 Nov 92 14: 34:59 -0500
	id AA18036; Mon, 9 Nov 92 14: 34:35 EST
	id <m0moeUB-0001MaC@tous.oau.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 92 14: 09 EST
	id <k940339@pro-magic.oau.org>; Mon,  9 Nov 92 11: 12 EST
From: gatech!pro-magic.oau.org!mikeu (Mike Ungerman)
Subject: Re: Rascals: Did I miss something?
Organization: Pro-Magic [A Proline BBS] Orlando, FL
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 11:07:38 EST

This probably belongs in the tech area, but once again the Enterprise is
surprised by uncloaking warships.  And they'
re "surplus" Klingon warships.

Why, with the aliance with the Klingons, hasn't the cloaking technology
been given/traded/purchased by the Federation?

Guess this would make the Enterprise to invinceable.

-------------
Mike Ungerman
mikeu@pro-magic [a Proline BBS, Orlando, Fl]
Internet: mikeu@pro-magic.oau.org
Voice: 407-366-5840 | Prodigy: JSNP58A | Compuserve: 71326,31
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: meb@sally.acns.nwu.edu (Mark Brodsky)
Subject: Re: Guinan
Reply-To: mark-brodsky@nwu.edu
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 19:43:28 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.171451.19647@ncsu.edu> cfmcgarr@eos.ncsu.edu  
(CHRISTOPHER F MCGARRAH) writes:
> 
> Just a curiosity.  Is it possible that Guinan is a Time Lord from the
> Dr. Who series?

NO.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: Denes.House@launchpad.unc.edu (Denes House)
Subject: Re: STVII: Kill Kirk !
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 15:55:41 GMT

	Yes! Yes! Yes!
I wanted Kirk to die a hero in Trek 6, but he did not. (Iloved Trek 6
nonetheless). Kill him well, you do a service to his legend.
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
From: marc r stephens@um.cc.umich.edu (Marc Stephens)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: GIFs of Ensign Ro(where?)
Date: 5 Nov 92 21:11:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: engin.wh==C7-
Organization: University Of Michigan Medical School
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d9
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A71EF8F892022477@no-name-medlib.med.umich.edu>
X-Xxdate: Thu, 5 Nov 92 16:14:48 GMT

Does anyone know where I could FTP (or otherwise find) GIFs of Ensign Ro?
Thanks!
Marc
marc.r.stephens@um.cc.umich.edu
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: A Lament.  A big damned Lament.
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:46:20 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <BxDysz.54o@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>, pjohnson@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca (Peter Johnson) writes:

> 	It is a tribute to the designers of the transporter that it can

It's a tribute to the "script writers".


> adapt to unforeseen situations, rescuing the bodies and minds of
> transportees IN SPITE OF the unusual circumstances.  

Yea, it's got a mind of it's own.

>Its safety record remains unblemished.

Terry "Take the bus, and leave the transporting to us!" Wood
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Spoiler info from the LA creation Con
From: lawson@ssdvax.mdcbbs.com
Date: 8 Nov 92 08:50:09 GMT
Organization: McDonnell Douglas - Space Station Division, Huntington Beach CA
Nntp-Posting-User: lawson

I also wanted to mention that this was the first Creation Con I've been to
where the dealers room and presentation room were not PACKED.

Maybe they have finally overpriced themselves...

Jim Lawson                      |	Lawson%ssdvax.decnet@lbgwy.mdc.com
                                |		Lawson@mdcbbs.com
These are MY opinions      ___-/_\-___		Jimbo@qed.cts.com
                _____________/( . )\_____________
               *    |    |  (  \_/  )  |    |    *
                   *|*  *|*  \_-+-_/  *|*  *|*
From: wombat@cs.montana.edu (Izurieta)
Subject: eternity
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, MSU, Bozeman Mt 59717
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1992 19:13:35 GMT


	Definition of Eternity :

	The time it takes Troi to leave after Reiker comes.
From: firestar@leland.Stanford.EDU (Lipton Ann Meredith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Rascals (minor spoilers)
Date: 5 Nov 92 06:07:38 GMT
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA



Well, I just saw Rascals, and I have to say, it wasn't nearly as painful as
I thought it would be.  Sure, the explanation was a bit on the bullshit side,
but I bought it -- what I didn't buy was those uniforms shrinking to fit -- 
that went just a bit too far.  And you'd think the Ferengi would at least
notice that some of the children were wearing uniforms with rank insignias.

The best part of the episode, though, was young Jean-Luc.  That kid is going
to grow up to be some heartbreaker -- and that accent was the sexiest thing
in the world, even though I feel like a child molester to say so.  Oh, give him
a couple of years, and then  -- oy, and then!

Firestar
-- 
I don't bite, you know.    | Find me and turn thy | It is better to have loved 
Unless it's called for.    | back on heaven.      | and lost than to have your
-- Audrey Hepburn, Charade | -- R. W. Emerson     | finger caught in a blender.
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: M17257@mwvm.mitre.org
Subject: Re: Cloaking devices (Spoilers) Rascals
Organization: The MITRE Corporation, McLean VA 22102
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 21:29:57 GMT

In article <BxDFFD.9qC@acsu.buffalo.edu>
v070p6nd@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Anthos) writes:
 
>
>In article <1992Nov7.055857.23693@netcom.com>, moe@netcom.com (Morris Bisted) writes...
>>Spoilers for Rascals
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Now that the Enterprise has caught 2 Bird of Prey, hopefully the
>>Federation will have the forethought to try and figure out how this
>>technology works.  Then we won't repeatedly be pummeled with the
>>tired plot device of the Bird of Prey de-cloaking in front of the
>>Enterprise while its shields are down and immediately
>>blasting away causing the injury of the enterprise and requisite
>>heroic acts and "victory snatched from the jaws of defeat" endings
>>that this theme has brought about.
>>
>>But no!!  The Federation has only had knowledge and actual possession
>>of the cloaking device since Kirk stole it in TOS (Did IBM get the
>>development contract or what?).
>>
>>Morris
>
>It is my understanding that one loses the higher warp speeds and a great deal
>of shield strength by having a cloaking device(not just using, but having one
>installed).  The Federation has greater DEFENSIVE capabilities by having
>stronger shields and bieng able to outrun ships with cloaking devices.  The
>Federation chose to have increased warp capability and shields instead of
>the cloaking device.  I personally would rather have a greater chance at
>escaping without major losses than be able to 'sneak up' on a ship, especially
>since I wouldn't be able to fire when cloaked.  (I don't know why the 'able to
>fire when cloaked' model of cloaking device {ST:TUC} isn't being used).
>
 
Perhaps...the Enterprise computer KNEW the two ships were there, but because th
ey were Klingon vessels, did not alert the crew. (the DO have an alliance w/ th
em).
 
Overall, I disliked the episode, it made Riker and Worf look like they could
not control the Enterprise. Yeah, right! Like they got to the ranks they have
and on the fleet's flagship battlecruiser(or whatever it is) by not being able
to avoid this very situation!
 
My patience is wearing thin on this one.
 
Actor that played the young Picard though, did a good job, managed to portray
several of Picard's mannerisms.
I liked the young guinan too.  Ro was okay-easier to forget who she was suppose
d to be(but maybe that was the idea?)
 
 
And once again the Ferengi are made to look like fools!
 
Ellie Blackwell
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: LOVE THEM TREKKIES
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Date: 6 Nov 92 03:32:09 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Nov6.023047.28149@news.acns.nwu.edu>, meb@sally.acns.nwu.edu (Mark Brodsky) writes:

>> Yea, we're VERY BUSY people here!  We have time, however, to argue what
>> is the CORRECT middle name of Captain James TERRY Kirk.

> TIBERIOUS!---

The name's "Terry".  If yer gonna argue about Jimmy T-bone Kirk's name, do
it rec.arts.startrek.MISC.

Terry "Thank You" Wood
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: rccarm00@nx19.mik.uky.edu (ron c carman)
Subject: Re: "Nightshade" -- new TNG novel
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
X-Path: nx19.mik.uky.edu!rccarm00
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 22:39:04 GMT

mary@fresh-and-fruity.ai.mit.edu (Mary S. Lee) writes:

>The latest Next Generation novel, number 24, is out.

>Title: "Nightshade" 
>By:    Laurell K. Hamilton

>Some comments with microscopic plot spoilers follow:-

>I thought this book was most disappointing.  The plot was adequate,
>though by no means good, but the prose was *bad*.  It amazes me that
>Pocket brings out TNG novels of this quality.  Surely they must make
>enough profit to pay for better authors or a more diligent editor?

     I certainly have to agree about the need for a better/more diligent
editor.  When we start seeing such bad grammar as evidenced in this novel,
we have to decide: Is this the fault of the editors, or can someone
become a published author practicing grammar at the Middle School level?

>On the positive side, Laurell Hamilton does appear to be reasonably
>familiar with the characters.  The portrayal of Troi and Worf,
>including their attitude toward each other, seems largely consistent
>with the show.  It's not precisely how I view the characters, but it's
>reasonable.

     Reasonable?  Not by a long shot.  I found both to be far overdone,
ala Troi's performance in "Man of the People".  I couldn't even read
more than a page at a time without running across an encyclopedic 
account of the emotional state of everyone in the room, as viewed 
through Troi's ability.  Picard is just a little too annoyed at Worf's
protectiveness, and Worf & Riker are just this side of insubordinate
while arguing against Picard's being the negotiator.  
     I just don't see how you can call the characterization anything
other than abysmal.

>But unless you are a devoted Worf fan, or a devoted Troi fan, or
>desperate to have a complete collection of the TNG novels, save your
>$5-50 and skip buying this one.

     I agree, if somewhat more emphatically.  I would recommend
not even reading this one.  I certainly will never re-read it.

RC Carman

--
/=======================================================================\ 
|     Ron C. Carman          ||  Quantum physicists get all the girls.  |
| rccarm00@mik.uky.edu       ||  Al.  Is he live, or is he a hologram?  | 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: alan@pacdata.uucp (Alan McLachlan)
Subject: Re: Why was ST V so bad?
Organization: Pacific Data Products
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 18:05:43 GMT

In article <69053@cup.portal.com> DonD@cup.portal.com (Don Robert DeCosta) writes:
>ST V was bad because....
>
>1) It reeked of product endoresments: from Jack Daniel's to Nike!  These
>   were not clever endorsements ala the MacIntosh in ST IV but rather just
>   bad, "help-us-pay-for-the-movie", endorsements.
>
>2) The FX weren't just bad, they sucked! Big Time!  20 seconds into the film
>   I said, "these can't be ILM FX" and they weren't and it showed.
>
>3) The Big E! falling apart all around was sickening! The monochrome
>   monitor sitting on a shelf in the turbo lift used to give the illusion
>   of movement made be pissed!  Uhuru doing the Fan Dance was gross both
>   asthetically and as a character developement for Uhuru, let Uhuru age
>   gracefully and find a young ensign to exploit for that mission!
>
>I seem to have begun rambling and have forgotten to number my reasons!
>To sum up: the movie was TV movie-of-the-week quality and the director
>is to blame!
>
>DonD@cup.portal.com

Bingo! IMHO the story of STV was pretty good, though its presentation
was terrible, and that is the responsibility of one person - - the
director!

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
  Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Alan McLachlan                       [ucsd|uunet]!pacdata!alan
Pacific Data Products                alan@pacdata.com
--------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ewing@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu (Rick Ewing)
Subject: Re: Silly Hand Motions was Re: TRUE Q  *SPOILERS!!!*
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: Vanderbilt University
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1992 16:15:52 GMT

In article <LAU.92Oct29084954@sunset.ai.sri.com>, lau@sunset.ai.sri.com
(Stephen Lau) wrote:
> 
> 
> It actually reminded me of something someone would do on Bewitched. I was
> half expecting that silly sound effect they had on Bewitched. Kinda like
> a harp sound.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 

Actually, the hand motion more reminded me of the motion that was taught to
kids on PBS' "Zoom" show in the early 70's.  Do any of you remember *that*
show?

"Send it to Zoom!  That's Box 3-5-Oh!  Boston, MASS, Oh-2-1-3-4!  Send it
to Zoom!"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: updike@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Todd F. Updike)
Subject: fish tank question
Reply-To: updike@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 23:25:57 GMT

Hey folks, I guess I'm dumb on this one, but what is the secret
about Pickard's fishtank ?? 

Is it a disguise for some control center or something ??
Someone please help me here.

PS, I really thought RASCALS sucked royally !!
God was that ever stupid !!!

And the one next week looks even dumber  !! (the western one)
Did you see the preview of Deanna in that stupid cowboy hat ??

I'm really losing faith fast in this season .....

Todd
From: thogek@cco.caltech.edu (Thomas G. Kiefer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: SPOILERS Rascals: Riker should be shot.
Date: 13 Nov 1992 21:20:17 GMT
Organization: Nope, just me.
Distribution: rec
NNTP-Posting-Host: chairie.caltech.edu

kan@bugs-bunny.rtp.dg.com (Victor Kan) writes:
>>I wonder if Data ever considered running around like The Flash and
>>applying Vulcan neck pinches to the Ferengi on the bridge.

In article <Bxnq9E.CJI@cs.uiuc.edu> zygote@cs.uiuc.edu (The seed of all life) writes:
>If Data could take over the ship single handedly against the entire crew
>in the episode with Dr. Soong, why couldn't he take it back from 6
>Ferengi?

The Ferengi (I thought there were seven?) were watching him, ready to
fire phasers if he did anything.  He'd likely have been able to take
out one, maybe even two, but the rest would have shot him, and
possibly shot and hurt others in the fray.

The Enterprise crew in "Brothers" was *not* suspiciously watching
Data for such a move, but in fact trusted him highly, and he was able
to much more insidiously plan and execute his takeover of the
Enterprise controls.
-- 
======================================================
====> Thomas Kiefer <===> thogek@cco.caltech.edu <====
======================================================
From: andy@eies2.njit.edu (Andy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: KAHN's last name?
Date: 11 Nov 92 19:47:18 GMT
Distribution: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: NJIT - EIES2


Here's something I haven't seen discussed... maybe because it's nothing!

I was watching William Shatner on QVC (a cable shopping channel) last night.
He was speaking about KAHN (Ricardo Montalban) and mentioned that his
full name was something like KAHN NUNIAN SING (literal spelling).

Now, isn't the guy who created Mr. Data named DR. NOONIAN SOON, or
something like that?  Is there some sort of connection between these
two names other than that they sound similar?  

If this is off-topic, an E-mail reply would be appreciated!

Thanks
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Ronny Cox featured in upcoming episode (Spoiler)
Date: 6 Nov 92 19:06:27 GMT
Article-I.D.: blue.9243
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <tomcat.721063008@cwis>, tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu (Jeffrey S. Jo) writes:

If you read this you will cry! 


>>guy.  In case you have not been checking your schedules, this should be
>>"Chain of Command", scheduled for the weeks of 12/26 and 1/2

>What about Riker?  I thought he was going to replace Picard after he 
>left?  And is this confirmed?  I would find it hard to believe that they would
>replace the captain with someone new.  Hmmm....I'll have to check the LA Times

This sounds like one of those "I'm taking over this ship" plots, ala TOS or
The Motion Sickness (err, Picture).  If it's not, I'll be surprised.

Like most of TNG, it's been done before.  Bleah!

Terry
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry
From: williamsd@mala.bc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: HELP
Date: 10 Nov 92 14:13:35 -0700
Organization: Malaspina College






HELP!!! I'M LOOKING FOR STARTREK DRINK RECIPIES (TREK BAR GUIDE)
AND/OR STARTREK FOOD RECIPIES, SO IF ANYONE OUT THERE HAS THIS INFO COULD THEY
MAIL IT TO WILLIAMSD@MALA.BC.CA. THANKS IN ADVANCE FOR THE HELP MAY YOU LIVE
LONG AND PROSPER!




















Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.current:17758 rec.arts.startrek.misc:11425
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: A Lament.  A big damned Lament.
Date: 7 Nov 92 05:47:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: blue.9272
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.current
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <16897DB1F.JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu>, JC924@uacsc2.albany.edu writes:

>>I just think it's funny to make Barkley out as a "loon" for being afraid of
>>the transporter and pointing out it's quadruple-redundant systems that can't
>>fail and then, a couple of weeks later, turning everybody into children with
>>the d*mn transporter.


> It wasn't the transporter that failed.  It was that the shuttle was in some
> sort of energy field.  O'Brien said they couldn't transport them but Riker
> ordered him to anyway because they were about to die.  It was the energy
> field which messed up the transport; the transporter worked fine.

I'm sure that'll make Mr. Barkley feel much better! ;-)  A Rose by any other
name...

Terry "DON'T BEAM ME UP, SCOTTY!" Wood
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry
From: smintz@sedona.intel.com (Stephen Mintz exp 11/92~)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Rascals - ship taken too easily?
Date: 6 Nov 92 18:54:12 GMT
Organization: Intel Corporation
NNTP-Posting-Host: alamo.intel.com
Originator: smintz@alamo


One problem with your view of the taking of the E-D, they had lost contact with
the science station, after it had reported trouble...I would have gone in with
phasers and Torps on-line...ready for any situation...the TOS used too...
Stephen
From: brian@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Brian Wood)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 19:42:38 GMT
Subject: Re: Rascals blooper - SPOILER
Organization: HP Mfg. Test Div., Loveland, CO