From: txa95@isuvax.iastate.edu
Subject: >Re: Response to txa95@isuvax(Response to Shannon Yeh)
Reply-To: txa95@isuvax.iastate.edu
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 22:18:18 GMT


In <Bw0zKL.CHF@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> ling@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Gary LING) writes:

>In article <Bw0uB5.Fov@news.iastate.edu> txa95@isuvax.iastate.edu writes:
>>
>>Do you really think those talents who go to Harvard, MIT, Stanford, ... as
>>young faculties need this PROTECTION bill to protect them from CG? The
>>university willl sponsor them to apply for green card anyway. They do not
>>need this bill at all(Well, some may need it to save $4000 of lawyer fee
>>and I could be wrong). They can stay in the US as long as they like. Actually,
>>getting a green card does not need such talent at all. 1/10 is enough.
>>Those who yelled loudly that they need this bill, those who prayed god to
>>bless them by having this bill passed, are just uncompetent cowards without
>>confidence in themselves. They are opportunist. They do not know how to 
>>benefit themselves through moral and justified means.
>>
>>My advice to you: while you are refuting Shannon's mad words, try to make
>>some sense and show us your intelligence. Otherwise, just keep quiet.

>What is wrong if the bill just benifits the ordinary CSS?
>And no doubt about that, those people who have worked hard to push the bill
>into law are very unselfish , and intelligent, if not talented by your
>definition. :-)
>The fact is, no matter this bill was passed or not, the majority of CSS are
>gonna stay here for the time being. The bill/law simply makes life easier
>for many of us CSS. 

Read my words again. I did not bash normal CSS who are going to be benefited
by this bill. Whom I looked down upon are those so called "blood cardres",
those who actively put this bill into law by any means. Their deeds are simply 
disgusting. What I feel toward the silent majority who are benefited from this 
bill is just disappointment. They kept silent even though they knew this bill 
did not come through moral means just because they are benefited. Those "blood
cardres" are simply encouraged by this silence. Are they "unselfish"?
Read their statement asking for donations. They want to keep this IFCSS
running. But I predict that the pass of this bill will only speed its death. 
They have become professional politician and they live on it. The result of
this bill could be good for those CSS(maybe including me), but what happened
here in the US simply shows that the moral standard of current Chinese
intellectuals are so low that they do not deserve to lead China into 
democracy, though they always think they do. This is also why almost
all the so-called oversea democatic organization are dying these days.

>From you posting, I feel like one thing is missing. That is LOVE, love to
>your fellow CSS. I am sorry, but I have to say this.

When I saw those "blood cardres" relentlessly pushing CMFN on China, painting
China as bad as they can in order to show that they need "protection", while
the CSS majority just kept silence, I also feel something is missing. That is 
sense of justice. That is LOVE, love to your fellow Chinese people inside China.

>-GL

Back to my original article, I was arguing that those talented people do not
depend on this bill to live on the US and they do not care. I assume you agree 
with me. 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china