HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: 00bwanderson@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: James T. Kirk
Date: 8 Nov 92 20:36:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: bsu-ucs.1992Nov8.153646.11604
Distribution: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1992Nov6.021532.4208@bnlux1.bnl.gov>, schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:
> In article <1992Nov3.220505.6178@ncsu.edu> gagibson@grad00.math.ncsu.edu (Gregory A. Gibson) writes:
> 
>>   I believe that the T stands for Tiberius, which came up somewhere in 
>> the original series.
> 
> Wrong.  It was clearly stated in act two of "Who Mourns for Adonis?"
> that Kirk's middle name was "Robert".  See also the episode "Where No
> Man Has Gone Before" in which Kirk's close friend Larry Mitchell creates
> a tombstone for him which reads "James R. Kirk".
> 
> This fact is again reenforced in Star Trek VI:The Voyage Home in which
> the Klingon prosecutor gives his name as "James Robert Kirk".
> 

While I realise all of this is tongue-in-cheek, it was Tiberius.  The
explaination for it is one of his parents was fond of Roman history, and the
emperors.  Hence, Tiberius.  Most people may know this, but hey, I never cared
before, and I care less now. 8^)

> 
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary L. Schroeder  		|  
> schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov         |        It's a pomaceous life. 
> Brookhaven National Laboratory  |

Spock out. 
-- 
.sig?  We don' need no steenkin' .sig!

Bruce Anderson: A tradition of Chaos and Disorder since 1967
spock@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (unix)	00bwanderson@bsu-ucs.uucp (VAX)
Don't look at me in that tone of voice!  BSU disclaims me, and I disclaim them.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: K1N2 <K1N2@UNB.CA>
Subject: R.A.S.Creative Request
Organization: The University of New Brunswick
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 23:55:58 GMT

I don't get r.a.s.creative and didn't even know about it until I
caught an offhand remark about it in another post.  I can't read
any posts from there since my university controls which usergroups
we get to read, and I'd really like to see what's there.

Could someone mail me some posts from there? My email address is
k1n2@unb.ca .

Thanks in advance,
-Aphoriel/Kinsman
From: pjb4288@ultb.isc.rit.edu (Pete - Toonatic - Boulay)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Star Ships of the Third Fleet (Monthly posting)
Date: 9 Nov 92 19:33:34 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Originator: pjb4288@ultb

FORGET THIS POST...WRONG POST!!!!!

Sorry....

Pete "Mary's embarrassed boyfriend" Boulay
-- 
Peter J. Boulay --17 Split Rock Road-Pittsford, NY 14534-The ToonAddict!
Email should be sent only to PJB4288@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Disclaimer: You don't like what I'm writing? Oh well.
"Well shut my mouth wide open!"- Tiny Toons HISMV
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Star Wars titles (was: Did Spock say 'Remembe
From: morgan@arc.ab.ca (Sean Morgan)
Date: 5 Nov 92 16:16:24 MDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Alberta Research Council

The first release of the movie did NOT say Episode IV, according to the FAQs
over in r.a.sf.starwars, which is where this discussion should be/go.  End of
debate, and more importantly, end of thread.
-----------------+-------------------------------
Sean Morgan      |  ALBERTA  6815 - 8 Street N.E.
                 | RESEARCH  Calgary, AB, Canada
morgan@arc.ab.ca |  COUNCIL  T2E 7H7

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: jen@athena.mit.edu (Jennifer Hawthorne)
Subject: Star Trek info needed -- dates?
Summary: Any helpful trivia buffs out there?
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Distribution: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 23:47:31 GMT


Some friends and I are working on a game set in the Star Trek
Universe, but taking place during the time of the Enterprise-C (from
"Yesterday's Enterprise".  Unfortunately we don't have this episode on
tape, and I know someone out there in net.land must, so I'm hoping
someone can give  us some help with some Trek Trivia:

1)  What _calendar years(s)_ was Star Trek: TOS set during?  What was
the stardate range?

2)  What _calendar year(s)_ is Star Trek: TNG set during?  What's the
stardate range?

3)  If you can't answer either of the above, what's the number of
years generally given between the two series? I know it's in the
seventies but can't remember it any better than that.  Does it date
from the start of the Enterprise NCC-1701's five year journey, or from
the end of the latest film, or what?

4)  What's the calendar year of Sar Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country?
What's the stardate?

5)  What was the calendar year of the fight in which the Enterprise-C
got destroyed?  What was the stardate? 

Please email responses to jen@athena.mit.edu, as I don't usually have
time to read this newsgroup.  

Thanks in advance for any and all help!

Jen Hawthorne (cowriter of "Star Trek: The Previous Generation" :-)
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.misc:11614 rec.arts.startrek.current:18372
From: savoia@sw.stratus.com (Rick Savoia)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Picard Manuver
Date: 13 Nov 92 16:15:03 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: watts.sqa.stratus.com

In article <james.36.721660918@library.nrl.navy.mil>, james@library.nrl.navy.mil (James King) writes:
> In article <9353@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood) writes:
> >From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
> 
> It's that thing where he does a short warp jump from outside firing range to 
> come right up next to them and start shooting.  Got it.
> 
> James King


Close.  He used it when his ship, the Stargazer, was attacked
by a (then unknown) Ferengi vessel.  He did a short jump
from one position (where they were very vulernable) to right in
front of the vessel where they could do maximum damage.  The
trick of it was that the timing was so precise that the Ferengi
were tricked into shooting at the afterimage of the Stargazer
left behind when they jumped instead of the real Stargazer. 
In effect, the Ferengi fired at the Stargazer, the 
Stargazer warped, the Ferengi hit the afterimage, the 
Stargazer appeared in front of them after the Ferengi 
had fired and blew hell out of the Ferengi.

-- 
==========================================================
Rick Savoia                     | "I'm just very selective
savoia@watts.sqa.stratus.com    | about the reality 
Rick_Savoia@vos.stratus.com     | I accept" - Calvin
==========================================================
From: domalley@unix1.tcd.ie (Slartibartfast            (alias Daniel O'Malley))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Is Colm Meaney Irish?
Date: 13 Nov 92 20:14:02 GMT
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin

In <BxMJst.7y8@acsu.buffalo.edu> v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey) writes:

>>Actually, he's from inner-city Dublin.  Just because Starlog said he was
>>from Cork, doesn't mean he was.  My source, Colm himself.

>     My source was Colm himself as well.  I cited STARLOG as a 
>     source because the original poster wanted written confirmation.
>     At a show in New York several years ago, my best friend (who
>     is from Kerry), asked him where he was from.  He said Cork,
>     which is less than an hour's drive from my friend's home.
>     She asked the question because a distant cousin of ours (we're
>     somewhat related... it's muddy) came over for a visit, saw the
>     show, and claimed to have gone to school - in Cork - with a
>     Colm Meaney who looked just like this one.

>     I'm not saying I'm right... but that's where I'm coming from.
>     Whether he lived in "inner-city" Dublin (there's a northside
>     and a southside, there's places like Barrytown... but there's
>     nothing called "inner-city Dublin") is something else entirely...
>     and entirely possible.  People do move.

Sorry, mate, but there is such a place as Dublin's 'inner-city', I should
know, it's where I am right now!

And Colm Meaney has spent time in both Cork and Dublin.

Daniel.
--
|       //              |------Daniel O'Malley--domalley@unix1.tcd.ie------|
|   ===//  ===    ===   |---"In the beginning, the universe was created.---|
| //  // //  // //  //  |-This has made a lot of people angry and has been-|
|  ==//   ==// //  //   |--widely regarded as a bad move.":Douglas Adams.--|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist)
Subject: Re: Question about "T." in James T. Kirk !!!!!! (As seen on TV)
Organization: INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation, Naperville, IL
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 14:50:22 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.071852.26520@mr.med.ge.com> hinz@picard.med.ge.com (David Hinz Mfg 4-6987) writes:
>Roy (vcsc458@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu) wrote:
>: In article <1992Nov10.212428.100792@watson.ibm.com> rrogers@watson.ibm.com (Ryan Rogers) writes:
>: >In <1992Nov10.203818.14246@dsd.es.com> pmartz@dsd.es.com (Paul Martz) writes:
>: >>In article <BxIEtG.AEs@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, miles@expert.cc.purdue.edu (Derick) writes:
>: >>>In article <1992Nov10.051247.26359@midway.uchicago.edu> thf2@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>: >>>>In article <BxGwLn.HEo@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> bwbrock@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (Benjamin Warre Brock) writes:
>: >>>>>Tiberius
>: >>>>Terry
>: >>>Timmy
>: >>Testicular
>: >Tasteless
>: Transvestyte
>
>Taliesin

Yeah, Wright.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: byonef@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Fred Byon)
Subject: The TOS/TNG Pro Basketball Series -- Game 1 summary
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 03:37:17 GMT

I own a simulation pro basketball game for my IBM PS/2 (APBA Pro Basketball)
and I recently did some messing around with the player files.  I stuck in 
various characters of both TOS and TNG and put them on two separate teams.
They are playing each other in a best of seven series (both teams get three
home games and if a game 7 is needed, it will be played on a neutral court) to
determine "Star Trek supremacy", so to speak.  For this series, 1991-92 
NBA rules are used.

Here are the rosters:

TOS:    				TNG:

Kirk					Picard
Spock					Riker
McCoy				        Worf	
Scotty					Data
Uhura					LaForge
Chekov					Wesley Crusher
Sulu					Yar
Matt Decker (ST I)			Beverly Crusher
Chris Pike				Barclay
Robert April        			Guinan
 					Troi
				        Ensign Ro 

And here's the summary for game 1 (TNG had home court advantage)

	1	2	3	4    Total
TOS    24      20      32      27    103
TNG    25      31      34      30    120

TOS - Kirk 0-0 0-0 0, Spock 3-10 1-2 7, McCoy 9-18 5-5 23, Scotty 2-3 0-0 4,
      Uhura 4-10 3-6 11, Chekov 7-11 1-1 19, Sulu 0-7 2-2 2, Decker 8-17 0-0 16,
      Pike 4-10 1-6 9, April 5-12 1-2 12, Totals 42-98 14-24 103   

TNG - Yar 6-10 4-6 16, W. Crusher 5-8 3-4 13, Ro 2-6 2-3 7, Data 10-21 2-5 22,
      Worf 7-12 5-7 19, Riker 5-5 1-2 11, Picard 6-11 3-3 15, Troi 6-9 3-4 15,
      Guinan 1-3 0-0 2, Totals 48-85 23-34 120

3 point goals - TOS 5-8 (Chekov 4-4 April 1-4), TNG 1-6 (Ro 1-2, Picard 0-3)
Fouled out - None.  Rebounds - TOS 43 (Decker 11), TNG 54 (Data 14).  
Assists - TOS 29 (Pike 11), TNG 22 (Yar, Data 5).  Total fouls TOS 24, TNG 22.
Technicals - TOS Head Coach (Unknown Identity).  A - ?

Yeah, I know, some of the above stats seem pretty unrealistic (I think
Troi has even dunked the ball on at least one or two occasions).  But 
nevertheless, it was pretty entertaining to watch on my PC!  :-)

Game two is slated for tomorrow, with TNG once again with home court
advantage. 

Any predictions from the net?

Fred Byon
byonef@sage.cc.purdue.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: smackinnon@mta.ca
Subject: Re: A SIlly Top 10 List
Reply-To: smackinnon@mta.ca
Organization: Mount Allison U, Sackville, N.B. Canada 
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 20:35:08 GMT

In article <9NOV92.12122635@umbc2.umbc.edu>, noel@umbc2.umbc.edu writes:
>	From the home office in Arbutus Maryland, we bring you:
>
>
>TOP 10  THINGS OVERHEARD AT A TNG WRITER'S MEETING
>
>10.  "Playmates says they want another race of aliens for the toy line--
>      make one up"
>
>9.  "One more reference to Kei & Yuri and I'm going to hurl"
	What are the References to Kei and Yuri. Are they listed in the FAQ?

	Qshawn mackinnon
smackinnon@mta.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: mcohen@vax.clarku.edu
Subject: RE: Star Trek and Universal Studios
Organization: Clark University
Date: 10 NOV 92 13:35:49 GMT

In a previous article, sting@wells.rutgers.edu (Steve Ting) wrote:
>I was just wondering why Universal Studios in Hollywood has the
>Star Trek show (which I was lucky enough to enjoy last year with
>the little girl from Major Dad participating in the show), while
>both the Star Trek movies and The Next Generation are produced by
>Paramount Pictures, a rival of Universal.  Just wondering.  Anybody
>know of an explanation?
> 
I believe Universal, Paramount, and the other studios in the Hollywood area 
work together for the Universal park and tour.  I don't know if Paramount gets 
a piece of the pie from Universal, if Universal pays a licensing fee, etc.  I 
haven't been out there in a few years, but I do remember representations from 
many studios.  Likely this is so there can be one large attraction rather than 
a slew of smaller attractions.  Works for me.

/--------------------------------------------------------------------------\
|  \  /                                                              \  /  |
|  /  \               From the Desk and Mind of Mitch                /  \  |
|   /\                                                                /\   |
|  \  /                   MCohen@Vax.Clarku.Edu                      \  /  |
|   \/                                                                \/   |
|            Any opinions expressed are clearly someone else's!            |
\__________________________________________________________________________/
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: puter@orphan.nashvil.ingr.com (PuterDude)
Subject: Re: Scotty got burned!
Organization: Intergraph
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 22:23:56 GMT

 crdunlea@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Christopher R. Dunlea) gratuiously mentions.
> pjb@cci632.cci.com (Phil Busardo) writes:
>>Wrong, he got something for nothing.  The ship that got blown away by the E
>>was not Scotty's ship (or Camaro), remember?  He was just a passenger.
>
>Still, he saves the Federation's flagship and doesn't even get a drink
>from Giordi. Ain't much gratitude in the next generation IMO.

No, but he got a WHOLE bottle before. Except for the couple of drinks
that Picard swallowed.

"It's green."

-- 
(Puter is a deranged individual at puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com)
I can't give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.	-- The Wizard of Oz
From: williamsd@mala.bc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: REQUEST FOR HELP!
Date: 13 Nov 92 14:59:08 -0700
Organization: Malaspina College



















WELL HERE I AM AGAIN FOR ANOTHER REQUEST. FIRST OF ALL I WOULD LIKE TO
SAY THANKS IN ADVANCE, AND SECOND OF ALL I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF ANY
ONE OUT THERE BY CHANCE WOULD HAVE A STAR TREK {ACOHOL}BAR GIUDE FOR
MIXING DRINKS.I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR IT FOR A WHILE AND HAVE HAD NO
LUCK FINDING IT. I ALSO WONDER IF ANYONE HAS ANY STAR TREK FOOD RECIPIES
FROM THE ORIGIONAL SERIES OR THE NEXT GENERATION,THIS ALSO APPLIES TO THE 
BAR GUIDE. IF SO WOULD YOU PLEASE MAIL THEM TO WILLIAMSD@MALA.BC.CA
THANKS AGAIN  AND LIVE LONG AND PROSPER   -SPOCK





















Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: jsbell@acs.ucalgary.ca (Joshua Bell)
Subject: Re: A universe of Bipeds! Why?
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 18:06:24 GMT
Organization: The University of Calgary, Alberta

In article <BxKE5J.Dpy@news.cso.uiuc.edu> crsg9887@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Chad R. Sandstrom) writes:
>Could someone please explain any existing
>rationale behind the ST:TNG universe being
>so completely populated with humanoid bipeds?

In TOS, its mentioned a couple of times - 'The Preservers'.
Evidently these beings passed through the Milky Way a million or
so years back, give or take a million. They noticed Protohumans,
liked what they saw, and 'seeded' them throughout the galaxy.
They tuned and twiddled with each group to adapt them to their
new environments (eg, Vulcans were given pointy ears and
copper-based blood, Klingons the much tougher bodies and skulls,
etc). What you see in the galaxy 'now' are the descendents of
these various peoples.

>Is it simply for convenient love plots for
>Riker?

And Kirk. :) Those green-skinned Orion slave women... ooh baby!

>At least in TOS there was that sentient, motherly
>rock...

For all of TNG's SFX budget, you'd think we'd get something
better than Space Critters and Glowing Entities. And no, I don't
count the Ferengi as better. :)

Joshua
|         A shimmering net undulating like an infinite borealis.             |
|                                                  - Chapterhouse: Dune      |
|                                                                            |
| jsbell@acs.ucalgary.ca  Academic Computing Services, University of Calgary |
From: robrod@csa.bu.edu (Roberto Rodriguez)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Q episodes
Date: 12 Nov 92 17:15:58 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Computer Science Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Originator: robrod@csa


There's a lot of Q-bashing in this newsgroup lately and I thought I would
put my $.02 worth.

I personally like the idea of Q (an immortal, omnipotent being), but I
think the writters are using him very incompetently.

Here you have a group of beings (a race?) which have become god-like by
their own effort.  I can think of endless possibilities.  The Next
Generation meeting such a life-form so soon should have tremmendous
repercussions, and yet, it only led to Q being considered a pest:  "Oh Q
go away, you're bothering us."  Imagine if the Bible had written that
Moses sayed something like, "Oh God, you killed all those Egyptians, how
can you expect me to trust you?  Go away!"  Just think of how God
would have reacted to this!

The first 3 episodes Q appeared in were so-so, but I saw potential.
Potential that was never taken advantage of.  I'm not a writter to make
up a better story-line, but at least I know what needs to follow the
discovery of a being like this (certaily not an episode about Robin
Hood!!!).

I think the writters just use him for cheap-ratings the same way sitcoms use
cameo appearances by big actors.  Actually, TNG also used Bones, Spock,
and Scotty for the same purpose (All 3:  No plot, just stars).


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: schamber@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca (Sylvain Chamberland)
Subject: Re: Yet another TNG guest star found on other show
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 19:25:12 GMT

I have another one: on LA Law again...  in the season premiere last week.
The chief a the delegation of people reading minds in "Violations" (I
don't remember his name) was doing a neurologist...



-- 
Sylvain Chamberland           INTERNET: schamber@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca   
Dept. of Biology          -----------------------------------------------------
University of Waterloo    |  "Biochimiste un jour, biochimiste toujours!"
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada |                               - anonyme
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: pjohnson@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca (Peter Johnson)
Subject: Re: Latest Paramount ST:TNG schedule (as of 10/14/92)
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 07:28:30 GMT

In article <9199@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood) writes:
>In article <1dcmgoINN427@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>, david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright) writes:
>> Why the repeats? Is TNG going on vacation or something? Do they always
>> do this?
>Yea, they do.  I have no idea *why*!

	As with other hour-long dramas (like L.A. LAW), Next Gen takes more
than 5 weekdays (usually 8, I believe) to shoot one episode.  Since they
don't have a whole season's episodes ready to air by September, they have
to take period breaks so that principal photography on new episodes and
post-production on unaired episodes can proceed.

-- 
Peter Johnson	       "There are times, sir, when men of good conscience	
Independent Studies     cannot blindly follow orders." --Capt. Jean-Luc
University of Waterloo  Picard (Patrick Stewart) to Adm. Haftel, STAR TREK:
pjohnson@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca 		THE NEXT GENERATION, "The Offspring"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.current
From: jd@gab.unt.edu (JD Hancock)
Subject: Looking for Episode Lists?
Summary: Where to get an episode list.
Keywords: list, episode
Organization: College of Arts and Sciences
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 02:09:32 GMT

Howdy!

I've noticed several posts recently asking for a list of episodes.  Of 
course, there are several people on the net who maintain such a list, but 
there is yet another place you can get one.

There is an anonymous ftp site at the University of North Texas, 
ftp.unt.edu.  There is a document under /pub/misc that contains a list of 
episodes and summaries, both in ASCII and postscript formats, for TOS, TAS, 
TFS, and TNG.

Just thought I'd spread the word.

Go figure,

JD                                ( jd@gab.unt.edu || jdude@unt.edu )
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.misc:11473 rec.arts.startrek.current:17924
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Picard Manuver
Date: 9 Nov 92 19:03:54 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <BxDCpy.BIu@monitor.com>, michael@monitor.com (Michael Johnson) writes:
> It's painful for me to admit this, but I missed the episode in which the  
> Picard Manuver was first described.  Could someone please describe it?  Reply  
> e-mail direct to me if you think I'm the only person in the universe who  
> doesn't have a clue...

It's the manuver that Picard uses to remove Beverly's bra.

"Oh Jean-Luc!  The PICARD manuver again!"

Terry "Absolutely True" Wood
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: You heard it first here
Date: 11 Nov 92 23:52:26 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Nov11.174937.19870@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>, er@iscp.Bellcore.COM (Elie Rosenfeld) writes:
> Here is the inside scoop on some TNG episodes to be shown later this season:

> Sounds like some interesting viewing ahead!

I should say!  ALL of these sound better that this seasons episodes (but NOT
a good as, let's say, LOST IN SPACE).

I nearly died laughing thinking of Guinan as "Buckwheat".

Terry
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry