HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: Jester & Gina sitting in a tree, K_I_S_SI_N_G
From: phygod72@nic.gac.edu (Phil )
Date: 17 Nov 92 10:01:57 -0600

In article <Bxu46v.C4o@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>  writes:
} goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
} >jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes:
} >>>>well...i would have to say that Gina loses the sleeze contest..
} >>>>Gina is a well-respected lady that only lowers her bodice line
} >>>>when it gives her the advantage...like when she 'bought' 6 votes
} >>>>for VP...which i might add she was quaLIFIED FOR ANYWAY
} >>>I only do what I have to do to get what I want. Thank you for
} >>>noticing. Want to come up sometime?
} >>sure......where do you lie anyways..i might have to ship
} >>myself air freight to come over......
} >A bit farther north than you, I am afraid.
} 
} I live in Michigan......just go to school in Indiana

Pretty sad, IMHO.  I got the hell out of Indiana.  Can't imagine anyone  
actually *wanting* to go there.  


} >>>>>chestnutt aka its so nice to have a penis
} >>>> Court Jester aka if you say so.....
} >>>SO.
} >>>Gina aka what fo you wish to call me?
} >>Jester aka my lover?????
} >My love. Just as long as you call me...
} Jester aka calls Gina
Phil squig taps phone line
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
From: blum@medici.ils.nwu.edu (Dan Blum)
Subject: Re: hell
Reply-To: blum@ils.nwu.edu
Organization: The Institute for the Learning Sciences
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 02:48:13 GMT

The revolution is not dead!  We shall prevail!

Brian - your days are numbered, and when we catch you we'll put you in
a far worse place than you're in now - Detroit comes to mind.

Dan aka Tool of Satan (the REAL one)
as certified by the Southern Baptist Churc
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
From: ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (T.F. Eccles)
Subject: Re: Jester and & masons
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 02:20:47 GMT

jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes:

>ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (T.F. Eccles) writes:
>>jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes:
>>>csg188@cch.coventry.ac.uk (MR X) writes:
>>>>	3) jester@edu.purdue.cc.sage	Christopher Jack DanielS Christian
>>>>					            ^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>						Isnt that a drink?
>>>first of all its jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu
>>>and secondly.....
>>And how old are you, little boy?

>Three...thats as high as i can count....

Right hand, left and, and um.... thingie./

>>>my name is not a drink. Jack Daniels is a drink...my middle
>>>nam,e has no S at the end..... nyah!
>>Yes it does, LOOK!

>Thats cuz you just put it in there......

I didn't. Look I have this chicken to prove it.

>>>Jester aka I am not a drink, I am not a drink
>>Eccles aka I am a teapot.
>Jester aka funny.....I always wondered why you had handles...
Eccles aka Only one, two would be uncomfortable.


Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
From: brom@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (David Bromage)
Subject: Re: Jester the loony
Organization: The Hexagon
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 05:15:15 GMT

T.F. Eccles (ins450m@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au) wrote:
: meetch@DIALix.oz.au (Mitchell Brandsma) writes:
: 
: >jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes:
: >>meetch@DIALix.oz.au (Mitchell Brandsma) writes:
: >>>jester@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jester) writes:
: >>>>Jester aka I am not a drink, I am not a drink
: >>>Meetch aka Nope, but you are a loony.
: >>Jester aka oo..swift eh....just took you this long to figure
: >>that out eh....i mean...you'd think you would have realized this
: >>after i mailed myself to you in pieces last spring...
: >Meetch aka Ooooh!  I thought that was a funny looking box of chocolates!
: <eccles blanches and runs for his chocolate in the frisge>
It does mention Jester on the pack. There, after lark's vomit.
I thought it was an almond whirl.

Debate time: which tastes worse, Jester or lark's vomit?

David aka Crunchy Jester? <blows chunks on the keyboard>
From: dinneen@sequent.com (Jay Dinneen)
Subject: Part time job [D [D [D [D [D [D [D [D [D- [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [Cfor DQ
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems, Inc.
Distribution: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 19:41:18 GMT


I think a good job for DQ would be emcee for the Ms.America Pageant.
Or maybe Mr.America.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: carlson@cwis.unomaha.edu (Brian D. Carlson)
Subject: Now that Dan's out
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:09:11 GMT

Hello,

	Now that Dan is out of office (soon anyway), is this group going
to vannish, or will it become a grammar check group?

Yuk yuk,
bdc
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Subject: Re: Bush wins doublespeak award
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 14:36:31 GMT
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <D2150056.j7s2ki@erics.infoserv.com> erics@infoserv.com writes:
>George Bush won this year's Doublespeak Award, given annually by the

    [stuff deleted]

>And what of Quayle? Well, the third-place Doublespeak Award went to
>all politicians who exploited the term "family values" this year.

    Don't keep us in suspense, Eric!  Who took third place?  Was it a
Republican sweep?

-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ. 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.elections,talk.politics.misc
From: mwmv@athena.cas.vanderbilt.edu (Michael Mogensen-Vermillion)
Subject: Re: RFD: alt.loathing.bob-dole
Organization: Vanderbilt University Mathematics Department
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:31:06 GMT

In article <BxvG4r.K03@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Matt Hucke) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.053547.984@news.acns.nwu.edu> dmeier@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Douglas Meier) writes:
>)-- 
>)Douglas C. Meier		| Read the Democratic party platform, then      
>)Northwestern University, ACNS 	| the 1933 Nazi Germany platform.  Now note 
>)This University is too Commie-	| the similarities.
>
>Such as?
>
>Hitler was strongly anti-abortion, btw... which party takes that same
>position?

Hitler was anti-abortion for people he labelled as Aryans.  Non-aryans 
were encouraged to have abortions paid for by the goverment.
     ^^^^^^^^^^
I also question the validity of Mr. Meier's implication, but I'm not
sure that abortion is the best counter-example.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: Dave Barry & Dan Quayle
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 21:47:36 GMT

In article <BxxIy6.85E@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Matt Hucke) writes:
[killing posters]

>
>It is sort of pointless, though, because we have a new Dan-Fan Republican
>every week.  They make several dozen ridiculous posts, claiming stupid things
>like Bush having more popular votes than Clinton, Gore saying cars were more
>dangerous than nukes, Danny Q being intelligent, etc.  Once they see we're
>not falling for their lies, they fade away and are soon replaced by another
>Limbot...

It'd be a courtesy if they would use the same name, or perhaps put
"Limbot" in the header somewhere.  Perhaps they'll see the light
and do this For The Rest Of Us.



In fiscal year 1991, the government agencies classified as secret a
total of 7,107,017 documents.  This marks the first time that the
total number of reported classification decisions in a year is a
palindrome.		-- 1991 Information Security Oversight Office
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sawyer@utahep.uta.edu (Lee Sawyer)
Subject: Re: Have some respect
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Texas at Arlington High Energy Physics Group
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:02:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.153543.9777@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh) writes...
>Edward J. Branley writes:
> 
>>llama@pooh.cc.utexas.edu (sine nomine) writes:
> 
>>> i've been wondering about this. people seem to be assuming that dan'll
>>> just hop right back into elective office, but it doesn't seem like too
>>> many ex-veep's have done that (i haven't researched it; does anyone
>>> have any stats about what vice-presidents generally *do* when they
>>> have to leave office?). once you've held the second-highest office in
>>> the land (well, in theory it is), can you really go back to a lesser
>>> office without losing face? assuming you have any left to lose, that is.
>>>
>>> --
>>> sine nomine | debbie martinson
> 
> 
>As a matter of fact, Hubert Humphrey, a former U.S. Senator from Minnesota,
>returned to the Senate a few years after serving as Lyndon Johnson's veep and
>then losing the '68 presidential race to Nixon.  The Senate even created a
>new (strictly ceremonial) position for him -- Deputy President Pro Tem, I think
>it was.  I'm not aware of any other Vice Presidents, at least in recent times,
>who later returned to lesser offices (though I think there's room for debate
>as to whether a Senate seat, which can actually carry considerable power,
>really is a "lesser" office than the vice presidency).  As for Danoe, I tend
>to think you're right; he'll probably try running again, but unless the good
>people of Indiana generously decide to supply the rest of us with some more
>laughs, I don't see much of a future for him in it.
> 
>- Patrick Walsh

   Some more historical trivia
1) John Quincy Adams returned to House of Representatives after serving as
   President. He was a congressman for about twenty years, and actually died
   in the House chamber, I believe.
2) William Howard Taft, the George Bush of the early twentieth century, became
   Chief Justice of the Supreme Court after serving as President.
3) ...as did Charles Evans Hughes, who ran unsuccessfully againt Wilson in 1914.
   (He was also the last presidential candidate with a beard.)

 I am betting Danny runs for office again, I am gleefully hoping that he goes
down in ignominious defeat...
       ================                           
         Lee Sawyer                                  

         Dept of Physics                          
         Univ. of Texas                            
               at Arlington
From: sham@cs.arizona.edu (Shamim Zvonko Mohamed)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Our Boy and Abortion...
Date: 23 Nov 92 21:15:21 GMT
Reply-To: shamim@cs.arizona.edu
Organization: U of Arizona, CS Dept, Tucson

In article <1992Nov18.202536.13312@netcom.com>, madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann) writes:
}The San Jose Mercury News and the San Francisco Examiner independently
}reported that the Oregon Republican Party is on the verge of a nasty
}internal schism.  The issue is not abortion, but homosexuality.

This is something I was wondering about. The Pope just released a new catechism
that says, among other things, that since "for most people, homosexuality is
not a choice," they should be tolerated (but they still have to be celibate).
Now the Danster has repeatedly said that he believes homosexuality is a
personal choice (although in words much more convoluted than those); has anyone
detected a softening in his position? (Ok, in the Danette's position.)

Next thing you know Dan and his pals will denounce contraception.

}The current head is ready to encourage moderates to form another
}Party, because he senses he's going to lose to the Radical Right.

Perhaps the best thing for the Republicon party at this juncture would be to
split from the Frothing Fundies. What can we do to ensure that such a split
does not occur?

-s
-- 
  Shamim Mohamed / {uunet,noao,cmcl2..}!arizona!shamim / shamim@cs.arizona.edu
  "Take this cross and garlic; here's a Mezuzah if he's Jewish; a page of the
    Koran if he's a Muslim; and if he's a Zen Buddhist, you're on your own."
   Member of the League for Programming Freedom - write to lpf@uunet.uu.net
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Happy Anniversery to the Second Couple...
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 07:17:15 CST
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

Just reading my mail, and the 'On This Day' mailing list tells me that today in
1972, JDQ married Marilyn Tucker.  That makes them married 20 years.  So, let's
all join together in wishing those crazy kids Happy Anniversery!



|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
From: entpph@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dan Quayle is a hero
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:27:14 GMT
Reply-To: entpph@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology

In article <BxxA44.49p@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v064mb7h@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu
 (Greg J Till) writes:
>post and give my hero Dan Quayle some support.  This genious...and political
>god if you will, gets nothing but criticism from the mass public and the 
>liberally controlled media.  Im here to say that I feel sorry for Dan Quayle,
>and dont think that he deserves half of the criticism that he gets.  The man
>is the greatest political mind in the White House, what he spells wrong in no
>way reflects his political stature.  Until these sharks who harp on spelling
>can correctly spell every word in the dictionary I wish to hear no more.  And
>god forbid the guy has some oppinions on family values.  SHOOT ME  I too believe
>that a two parent household is necessary for a childs welfare.  Lets look at 
>Dan's record....He has never lost an election before this one.  This reflects  
>my firm belief that he did nothing but help the Bush campaign, And the Bush 
>campaign did nothing but hurt him.  I hope we see Dan back in full force in 96'
>we need some conservatism guiding this country.

Wait!  Hold your fire!  Lemme explain something.  See, Buffalo had 2 and
1/2 feet of snow over the weekend--city paralyzed and all that.  Then
the Buffalo Bills won a squeaker on Monday night.  Everyone in Buffalo
has been crazy drunk for days.  And when they get crazy drunk, they head
for their terminals and do stuff like the above.  Just wait.  Do nothing.
in a couplea days we'll see a mumbled apology from this guy  "I'm sorry...
I was drunk...I didn't know what I was saying...etc."

Erik Timmerman
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: Historical trivia (was Re: Have some respect)
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:43:55 GMT

Lee Sawyer writes:

>   Some more historical trivia
>1) John Quincy Adams returned to House of Representatives after serving as
>   President. He was a congressman for about twenty years, and actually died
>   in the House chamber, I believe.
>2) William Howard Taft, the George Bush of the early twentieth century, became
>   Chief Justice of the Supreme Court after serving as President.
>3) ...as did Charles Evans Hughes, who ran unsuccessfully againt Wilson in 1914.
>   (He was also the last presidential candidate with a beard.)

It's also interesting to look at some of the government officials of the
Confederate States of America who returned after the war to service in the
U.S. Government; also generals in the CSA army (my favorite example:  if
memory serves, I think ex-CSA General James Longstreet served after the war
under U.S. President and ex-USA General Ulysses S. Grant, either in his
cabinet or as one of his ambassadors).

When Dan talked about running in '94, maybe was thinking that he could run
for President of the CSA (it's a stretch, I know, but I had to tie Dan into
this somehow!).

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
From: popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Dan's running
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 01:43:11 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX

 Time Magazine Nov 23, 92

Republican Heavyweights began to get the calls only a few days after the 
election.  Dan Quayle's secretary is inviting major G.O.P. contributers 
to a series of dinners at the Vice President's residence.  As she told 
one top dog, "the Quayles are ina partying mood."  Warming up for 1996, 
no doubt.

Well, it's nice to know Dan has a plan.  And he'll have four years to 
rest up.  So don't ditch that quote file just yet.  We may need 'em again 
in 4 years.

Meanwhile, down here in Houston, Texas, the official local Republican 
party has split up.  The Republican Chairwomen has left and set up her 
own new organiZation, leaving the ultraconservatives and Christian 
Coalitian creeps to squabble amongst themselves as to who is going to 
take over the shattered remnants of the local Republican Party.  And I 
hear that there may be a number of other splits throughout the nation, 
such as in Oregon, land of Proposition 9.  Since Dan was an especial 
favorite of the Christian right, this should be interesting to see how he 
tries to deal with both groups.  Especially if the rifts continue to 
grow.
  The term used down here by the local Republicans, (country club 
variety), for the Christian Coalitian zealots and such is "Theocrats".

When a nice label like this is invented, it ususally portends a long and 
bitter fight.  Go to it Guys!  See ya in '96, Dan!

Pope Charles  Subgenius Pope Of Houston     "Bob" loves you!

--
popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX, (713) 943-2728
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: dianem@boi.hp.com (Diane Mathews)
Subject: Re: Dave Barry & Dan Quayle
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara Division
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 15:58:39 GMT

Hi, I'm not a newbie, but i don't know how to kill files by certain authors.
Could someone help me?

And, in keeping w/ the theme of DQ, i find a certain poster's posts to
resemble the thought processes and logic leaps of our favorite veep.  And he
takes his posts as seriously as DQ takes his beliefs.  Curious.

Love your humor, Maddi!

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: schenn@mars.lerc.nasa.gov (Lisa Henn)
Subject: Re: Remember ...
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 17 Nov 1992 10:56 EDT  

In article <1992Nov17.023117.12619@muddcs.claremont.edu>, jason@jarthur.claremont.edu (Jason Merrill) writes...

>  I think that public transit will work if it is more
>convenient than driving; this is the key.  

I tend to agree with this.  I live 1/2 drive from work.  Cleveland complains
that it has traffic problems, but I know they pale when compared with cities
such as New York.  My own particular driving path does not clog.  

I could ride the light rail, but I would have to change to a second light
rail, then change to a city bus, and then change to the company bus to 
ultimately get to my office 1.5 hours later.  The cost of the fares would be
about the same as I spend on gasoline (somewhat less in the winter, actually,
now that we have gasahol and the price for gas seems to be higher).  I don't
take the public transit because the company bus runs in limited hours, and
due to the long commute, I would have to time my work day very well to 
ensure that I always had a ride back to the light rail system.  If the rail
system had a stop within walking distance of my office, I would probably
take it.  The cost to me would be about the same, and I could spend the time
reading on the train.  It also wouldn't drive my car into the ground so
quickly.  And my commute would be closer to 1 hour each way (I do a lot of
reading; I wouldn't mind that commute! :)  But, because of the multiple
transfers and the lack of assurance of a ride, it's not worth it to me to
patronize the public transit system.

Admittedly, I could move closer to work.

Just my $.02.

Say, does anyone know what Dan Quayle's opinion of public transit is?  (we
know what Al Bore's is :)

L
schenn@mars.lerc.nasa.gov
-------------------------
Disclaimer:  My employer does not claim we can breathe on Mars.
From: alizard@Blue.Kludge.COM (A.Lizard)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Actual Dan Quayle Interview
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 03:38:22 PST
Organization: 'Lectrick Blue!, Moraga CA

> 
> The top 2% got much richer.
> 
> Those still in the middle class are about even, but largely because
> of the vastly increased number of two-income families now in that
> income bracket.
> 
> The ranks of the officially poor mushroomed. Their relative wealth 
> decreased greatly.
> 
> *That* is what's shown by census data. And OMB data. And GAO data.
> 
> Crawl back into your NewSpeak hole and read a bit more Orwell -
> you didn't quite get it right this time.
> 
> - Don Coolidge


H&R Block did a study which was presumably taken from their income
tax files... that said EXACTLY the same thing. Maybe Kurt's numbers
are from the ALBANIAN Census.

A.Lizard

--------------------------------------------------------------------
A.Lizard Internet Addresses:
alizard%tweekco%boo@PacBell.COM        (preferred)
[path]!pacbell.COM!boo!tweekco!alizard (bang path for above)
alizard@seer.mystic.com (backup)   alizard@Blue.Kludge.com (backup)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge)
Subject: Periods in Quotes 
Keywords: Dan "Ol' Deer Eyes" Quayle, `Tippi' Hedrin
Organization: Paramax Systems Corporation, Paoli PA
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:20:55 GMT

  Wow!  I've gotten e-mail from all over the globe on this.  Please, please,
  my fingers are bloody stumps from replying to them all.  My keyboard now
  looks like Chopin's piano in that Really Famous Movie.

  I was simply mesmerized by the beguiling convention of the double sentence 
  terminator (.".).  When I saw these used, they reminded me of some strange, 
  undocumented C shell directory commands.  I looked it up in a style guide,
  and there is no situation in American English usage where this convention
  would be employed.

  And to think that there are some (no names shall be mentioned }8-) )
  who think that life as a member of the Cultural Elite (tm) is cushy!


-- 
 _________________________________________________________________________
|                                 |                                       |
| Herbert Rutledge, aka Train     |                                       |
| Paramax Systems Corporation     | "To post is human; to flame, divine.  |
| Valley Forge Labs, M/S GVL-3    |  But, man, will YOU get e-mail if the |
| P.O. Box 517, Paoli, PA  19301  |  subject is punctuation."             |
| Internet: train@gvl.unisys.com  |                     ---Alexander Pope |
|_________________________________|_______________________________________|

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: Re: Re. Integrity
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:17:53 GMT

Brian D. Carlson writes:

  (a reasonably temperate explanation of the basis for his conservative
   beliefs, then...)

>	The one thing I don't understand is this. If liberalism is the
>ultimate anser to all of our countries ills, why are the majority of
>liberals I have met bitter and seemingly miserable people, while the
>majority of conservatives I have met are easy going people who seem much
>more happy with who they are in life?

To paraphrase the late Graham Chapman of Monty Python (wearing his colonel's
uniform, of course):

"STOP THAT!  STOP THAT!  RIGHT!  Now, this began as a nice little explanation
of the poster's beliefs, but now it's just got silly!  Very silly indeed!
Right!  Now, let's see some nice fairy tales about the police..."

Okay, maybe the part about the police doesn't apply here.  :-)  But that bit
about the majority of conservatives being happy, well-adjusted people and the
majority of liberals being miserable misfits really needs some convincing
support, which just doesn't appear in the post.

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.clinton