HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mcdowell@hoss.unl.edu (Scott McDowell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Lee Corso's latest prediction
Date: 6 Nov 1992 17:49:29 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska--Lincoln	
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: hoss.unl.edu

In <1992Nov6.165646.6772@u.washington.edu> tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner) writes:

>For those of you who missed it, Lee Corso last night predicted that ... 

>And it looked like he really pissed off Tom Osborne.
can someone fill us in on the details?
--
Scott McDowell                 Computing Resource Center
University of Nebraska         Manager - Help Desk
Lincoln, NE 68588-0203         Internet: mcdowell@hoss.unl.edu
(402) 472-3970                 Bitnet: smcdowell@unlvax1
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Subject: Re: ALABAMA's RECORD!
Reply-To: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 22:20:39 GMT

In article <UeypsdW00WB3BaoFFn@andrew.cmu.edu>  writes:

> These stats are all for 1980-1991, the Crimson Tide's second worst ever
> decade.  (They didn't win any national championships in the 1950's either).

And one of the longest decades in history.  But one can't argue that
Alabama has a great program, and a great chance at #1.  

> (Yes, we all do that.  We have the nation's best fight song, too.)

Oh, let's not start that thread again....

--
************* "How about a little fire, Scarecrow?" **************
Orin Day, Code 664.1                    oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov
Hughes STX/NASA       GSFC Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics
*******"Think that this is NASA's opinion?   NO, NO, NO!!!" ******
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: zmed0b@trc.amoco.com (Michael E. Dupree)
Subject: Re: What happened to OU?
Originator: zmed0b@zircon
Organization: Amoco Production Company, Tulsa Research
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:51:17 GMT


In article <1992Nov10.195834.4519@hal.com>, ables@hal.com (King Ables) writes:
> >> > In article <1992Nov4.112116@trc.amoco.com>, zmed0b@trc.amoco.com (Mike)
> >> > writes:
> >> > >Probation happened to OU, pal.  Try cutting your scholarships in half
> >> > for >several years and see what happens to your team.  It ain't pretty
> >> > and OU >probably won't be top-flight for a couple more years.
> 
> >> In article <1992Nov6.084806@mccall.com>, scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
> >> > So why don't the OU fans understand Gibb's predictament?
> >> > Sending a UHaul to his house.  Some support.
> 
> > In article <1992Nov9.160839.13446@Arco.COM>, mminihan@inetg1.ARCO.COM
> > (Mike Minihan) writes:
> >> my clueless OU friends don't understand this. These are people that
> >> are losers in everyday life and the only thing that is positive is
> >> OU Football, and when they aren't winning, they get upset.
> 
> From article <1992Nov10.120118@trc.amoco.com>, by zmed0b@trc.amoco.com (Mike):
> > I'm sorry, but, I have to say that you are a complete idiot.  Your accusation
> > in reference to Oklahomans is without basis and devoid of any intelligence
> > whatsoever.  Clearly, you are a dolt.  Have a nice day.
> 
> Speaking of "devoid of any intelligence"...  He made no such accusation.
> 
> He accused *his* friends ("my clueless OU friends").  *You* are the one who
> jumped to the conclusion that he meant *all* Oklahomans (are we just the
> tensiest bit sensitive, maybe, hm? ;-)  ).
> 
> I know some Texas fans who fit this same description, but I sure don't assume
> it fits all Texas fans.
> 
> It's a GAME, for crying out loud, it's supposed to be FUN!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> King Ables                    HAL Computer Systems, Inc.
> ables@hal.com                 8920 Business Park Dr., Suite 300
> +1 512 794 2855               Austin, TX  78759
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> "Sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug."
> 				-- Dire Straits & Mary-Chapin Carpenter

This entire article is in reference to OU fans and their relationship with
Gary Gibbs.  Taken in context, this individual selects a sample of OU people,
calls them losers and doesn't fully qualify his statement at all.  Go back to
sleep, pal.  Rivalry is rivalry and there's nothing nice about it.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: r.s.f.c. Week 11 newsgroup poll results
From: <JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 14:42:20 EST
Organization: Penn State University

Alabama with a 3 point victory over Miami?  Sounds like a
mandate to me . . .


I'm terribly sorry, I thought this was alt.politics.elections.


Jim Thomas
Penn State
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: wessir@shelley.u.washington.edu (bill the cat)
Subject: Huskies, Hobert, and the Handout.
Reply-To: wessir@u.washington.edu
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:31:24 GMT

What a tough break for my home team.. Agghhh.  The quarterback who took
the team to a national championship is now ineligible.  He may or may not
play next year.  The loss changes the way the Huskies play.  Used to be that
an opposing team had to face two different but both good quarterbacks.  It
has not been the stellar season of last year.  On a few occasions this year,
one quarterback came in and accomplished what the other could not.  IMHO
Hobert was the stronger passer, Brunell the wiser "seasoned" scrambler.
Of course a case could be made the other way around too...  My point being
that Hobert was not your average "backup quarterback",  In fact, saying that
brunell is was the starter is misleading in that you might think he would
play the whole game.  That was not the case.  The only real meaning is that
Brunell played the first quarter.  Whoever did better by the third quarter
finished the game.  It worked out real nice.  Kinda like having 2 great
running backs, one big and strong and the other small and fast.  Does it make
any difference?  Hmm, judging by last weekend....  When you start losing 
players your game plan changes, we lost a lot of players this year.  Don
James says it didn't affect the game plan but I can't believe that.

Around here the media has really made this into a horrible story.  I watched
the press conference today and immediately after it the press "embellished"
the story like I wasn't paying attention.  No wonder it came out nationally
like Hobert was a wild hick partying down with cars, guns, wild weekends...
If he had not been married, the might have included orgys (sp?).  Also, some
people around here have chosen to defend Hobert.  That's an even bigger load
of crap.  I have no association with the NCAA but I know that there's no way
in hell that you can get an unsecured $50000 loan with no repayment schedule
at %10 and it be ok.  Come on!  I can't believe anyone would sympathize with
him.  Especially since he's probably going to be paid big money to warm a
bench in the NFL.  Greed got him and us like it has done to many other teams
in college ball.  Jeers to Billy Joe Hobert and every other player who sells
out his team, his school and his fans for early cash!

P.S.  That includes you too Emtman.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: confused@cwis.unomaha.edu (stephen richard smith)
Subject: RE: NEBRASKA
Summary: NEBRASKA
Keywords: nebraska
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 03:10:06 GMT


IT'S now 49 - 7 NEB. third quarter and Tom's got the cheerleaders in,
  I apologize for getting KU'S ranking wrong they are not 16th it's 12th
Well now that makes more sense
    Miami can you beat NU without those team members who wear stripes---
 I don't think so better keep them well payed- your going to need them
BYE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
PS. I take back jibes at KU they have class and didn't deserve it 
sorry guys
--
__________________________________________________________________________
| the federal government is basically one enormous, ongoing meeting from |
| HELL-----Dave Barry                                                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com (Kevin Rodgers)
Subject: Re: BUFF article
Keywords: Andy Knipp was spotted last night at the Wynkoop Brewery!
Organization: Buffalo Stampede
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 00:35:37 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.202635.28309@ncar.ucar.edu> ethan@earl.scd.ucar.edu (Ethan Alpert) writes:
>
>By B.G.Brooks
>--------------
>Rocky Mountains News Staff Writer
>
>Copied without permission
...
>	The Buffs lead the conference (No.2 nationally) in pass defense, are 
>third (No.40 nationally) in run defense and third (No35 nationally) in scoring 
>defense. The 52-7 loss at Nebraska, in which the Huskers rushed for 373 yards, 
>damaged CU's averages in run(140.3) and scoring(18.9) defense.

No kidding :-( In their other 8 games, the Buffs gave up an average of
111.2 yards on the ground and 14.8 points -- a little better, but not
good enought for top 10 rankings.

>	Turnovers ( 14 total against Oklahoma and Nebraska) have been fatal.

... the only games The Koy Wonder has started ...

>	"You take out those turnovers and people scoring on our offense, and 
>our scoring defense would look a lot better," he said. "You can't help but 
>wonder what would have happended."

Well, I don't know how many scores came on possessions following CU
turnovers in Colorado territory, but subtracting just the interceptions
returned for TDs by Baylor, Oklahoma (2), and KSU and the blocked punt
that was recovered for a TD by Minnesota still leaves 146 of the 170
total points (a 16.2 average, over twice 'Bama's).
-- 
Kevin Rodgers				kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com
Martin Marietta MS A16401		(303) 790-3971
116 Inverness Dr. East
Englewood CO 80112 USA			GO BUFFS!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: scott@ods.com (Scott Harper)
Subject: Re: SWC Review for 11/7
Organization: Optical Data Systems, Inc.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 14:45:24 GMT

John R. Boisseau (Jay) (boisseau@chpc.utexas.edu) wrote:
: 
: TEXAS at TCU
: ------------
: 
: Final Score:         TCU 23, Texas 14
: Predictions: Goober  Texas 38, TCU 17    <--------
:              Jay     Texas 35, TCU 24

See, Goober, *NEVER* pick the sips to win....

(course its fine with me if the anti-woofing theorem holds correct)
-- 
Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081
From: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Lee Corso's latest prediction
Date: 6 Nov 92 19:39:40 GMT
Article-I.D.: nntpd2.1992Nov6.193940.9016
Reply-To: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp. (VMS Software Support - Colorado)

--
>For those of you who missed it, Lee Corso last night predicted that 
>Louisville will beat Texas A&M on Saturday.

>And he again predicted that Arizona will beat Washington.

>And it looked like he really pissed off Tom Osborne.

>And I'm leaving now.

>GT

Can you expand upon the Tom Osborne thing? This gives us no idea what you are
talking about.

Husker Henderson

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 M_Henderson               | "Could you please continue the petty bickering?
 Marty Henderson           |  I find it most intriguing."   ---    Data, 
 Woodland Park, Colorado   |  Star Trek, The Next Generation, "Haven"
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfrederi@encore.com (Justin Frederich)
Subject: Re: Michigan, the leaders and the best
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 23:21:39 GMT

quay@engin.umich.edu (bryan scott luedy) writes:

>In article <> jfrederi@encore.com (Justin Frederich) writes:
>>Gee, you gloss over that loss to Florida State fairly quickly. I know you
>>would like to not include it but you lost in your own back yard 51-31.

>Gee Justin, what's with the constant Michigan flame?
>You (and your team) lose big here once?
> 
>I think the original post intended to show the strength of the
>home field this year (a la Arizona). 

Yeah Bryon I have a prejudice against Michigan because they post a lot
of things like the thread 'Michigan is better than Miami' but won't come
to Florida to play them. The only 2 meetings between Miami & Michigan were
in Ann Arbor. So when I see the Michigan people saying how great they are
I like to remind them that even in their own back yard they can lose
against a good team.

BTW Michigan did beat Miami by more than Miami beat them but I don't lose
any sleep over it. My book says : 1984 Mich 22 Miami 14
				  1988 Mich 30 Miami 31

My position is that when top teams schedule games they should agree to
a home and home series. I understand that to get a 6th home game many
schools will pay a lessor team to play there (usually on a 1 time basis).
I have no problem with that and a lot of times the exposure for the lessor
team helps their program. But if a school like Michigan tells a school
in say the top 30 or 40 that they will only play them in Ann Arbor then
I feel it is arrogance and I don't like it.

I'm sorry if you took it personally because I didn't mean it that way.

Justin
From: ethan@earl.scd.ucar.edu (Ethan Alpert)
Subject: Re: NEBRASKA
Summary: NOTHING INPORTANT
Organization: Scientific Computing Divison/NCAR Boulder, CO
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 17:13:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov8.173043.20357@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com> m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson) writes:
>
>Now this is sooooo refreshing. Are you reading this CU fans? This guy has the
>class to just admit that his team got beat, does not whine about it, and then
>focuses in on the next game. He is a good looser and I bet he will be a good
>winner if KU beats CU next week. Bravo !!!  KU has the NU fans respect. CU
>does not.

What profound insight.

Now could you show us what a good winner is like?

>
>Husker "Njan" Henderson


-ethan
--
Ethan Alpert  internet: ethan@ncar.ucar.edu | Standard Disclaimer:
Scientific Visualization Group,             | I represent myself only.
Scientific Computing Division               |-------------------------------
National Center for Atmospheric Research, PO BOX 3000, Boulder Co, 80307-3000
From: jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Washington vs. Arizona
Date: 8 Nov 92 04:57:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: serval.1992Nov8.045724.5816
Distribution: usa
Organization: Washington State University

In article <1992Nov7.234015.28427@u.washington.edu> baze@carson.u.washington.edu (Behzad Khamneian) writes:

  [stuff on UW loss to UA deleted]

>I am still prepared for the worst -->  An 0-9 record on Thursday!!
                                                         ^^^^^^^^

What is the significance of Thursday?  Did I miss an
announcement of a ruling to be made or something?

Jim
Go Cougars, Vikings, Northstars!
From: tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Sagarin Rankings - Michigan # 1
Date: 6 Nov 92 05:57:27 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

>In article <1992Nov5.193332.27235@u.washington.edu> tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner) writes:
>>>-- 
>>>David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
>>>VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
>>>uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
>>>davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
>>
>>Yeah, if I were using his ratings to bet in Vegas and making money, I probably
>>be so pissed that he missed the Michigan-Purdue game that I'd flush his
>>little system down the can.  No sir, if it's not 100% correct every week,
>>it's no good.
>>
>>GT
>
>Is your argument in this newsgroup 100% correct every week during the season?
>Could you please find me anyone that is 100% correct every week during the
>season?
>
>If you argument is correct, well, everyone on this newsgroup is no good.
>There is nothing to say any more.
>
>
>- Louis
>
>
>P.S. Michigan bashing is ON THE RISE!  May be some people feel jealous about
>     how much $$ Michigan made, or how many admiration and respect Michigan
>     get while still not at the top of the world, or just have to find a way
>     to let-go the city-lives related anger and frustration?

I'll try to be nice about this...

Will you please get a clue?

GT
From: morse@satie.cs.unc.edu (Bryan Morse)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Pepsi State vs. BYU, Marshall Faulk vs. BYU
Date: 7 Nov 92 15:38:16 GMT
Organization: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Just to clear up a misunderstanding...

In article <92310.093642MXD118@psuvm.psu.edu> MXD118@psuvm.psu.edu (Spiro the Spiny Goldfish) writes:
>In article <17196@borg.cs.unc.edu>, morse@cs.unc.edu (Bryan Morse) says:
>>It seems that after the losses to Miami and BC, and removal from any
>>MNC contention, Pepsi State (*sob*) just didn't have anything left to
>>play for.
>
>Gee, I remember saying something like:

  [something quite reasonable]

>which would seem to indicate I thought the "nothing to play for" business was
>only a bit of the cause.
>
>Of course, I must be mistaken, since you're always right.

Ahh, the joys of network delays.

I posted my reply to Mark's message *before* your reply reached the rest
of the net.  Likewise, my message reached you after you had already posted
yours.

What I wrote was not intended as a direct reply to yours, but as a rather
indirect one to the sour grapes coming from some (repeat: *some*) PSU fans 
about how BYU won because PSU had nothing to play for.  Many have graciously 
admitted that BYU simply outplayed PSU.  You seem to feel that (on top of 
a lot of other factors) it may have had "only a bit" to do with it, and 
that seems like a reasonable position.  

No personal offense was intended and I'm sorry if the network delay made
it seem that way.

-- 
Bryan Morse                University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
morse@cs.unc.edu           Department of Computer Science
From: gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary L. Newell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: WAR OVER!!!! MIAMI WINS !!!!!!
Date: 8 Nov 92 18:35:44 GMT
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <!fA=Ag+@engin.umich.edu>, chyang@simile.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang) writes:
> 	Flame on?  Nope.  The Husky fans have too much class for that! 


 hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! Too much class? Now that's a good one!!
Geez - until this moment I didn't even think they had a sense of humor never
mind the slightest bit of class - I guess this "class" suddenly appeared
when they had to realize that they are the second best team in the Pac-10
this season huh? They'll most likely go to the Rose Bowl but everyone
knows who really is the best in the Pac....


			gln
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: MS State, Florida, Bama
Organization: University of Michigan
	<dkm2.721417677@Isis.MsState.Edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 19:31:51 GMT

In article <dkm2.721417677@Isis.MsState.Edu> dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K. Magee) writes:

   hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org (Huett Bishop) writes:

   >No justice, Southern Miss only plays Division I schools and get nada, while the
   >big boys (Miami,Bama,Mich) get to play some divison II schools and coast in the
   >standings.

   I completely agree.  We came from behind and beat Memphis State AT Memphis

If you guys agree, then perhaps one of you could provide some information to
support the (maimi,bama,mich) contention.  I didn't think so.  

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: MS State, Florida, Bama
Organization: University of Michigan
	<dkm2.721417677@Isis.MsState.Edu>
	<BILLMS.92Nov10143151@gip.eecs.umich.edu>
	<dkm2.721432350@Ra.MsState.Edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 22:51:52 GMT

In article <dkm2.721432350@Ra.MsState.Edu> dkm2@Ra.MsState.Edu (David K. Magee) writes:

   billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:

   >In article <dkm2.721417677@Isis.MsState.Edu> dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K. Magee) writes:

   >   hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org (Huett Bishop) writes:

   >   >No justice, Southern Miss only plays Division I schools and get nada, while the
   >   >big boys (Miami,Bama,Mich) get to play some divison II schools and coast in the
   >   >standings.

   >   I completely agree.  We came from behind and beat Memphis State AT Memphis

   >If you guys agree, then perhaps one of you could provide some information to
   >support the (maimi,bama,mich) contention.  I didn't think so.  


   Well, I can clear that up.

That wasn't the issue David.  The claim was made that (miami, bama, mich)
play some division II schools.  This is not true, and I was calling you guys
on it.

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tbreeden@afit.af.mil (Thomas A. Breeden)
Subject: Where's the Swamp News?
Organization: Air Force Institute of Technology
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 16:20:47 GMT

I'd sure like some news from the Swamp, like old
times.  Of course, I don't want "Matthews for
Hiesman" stuff.  That makes teams lose ball games.

I would like at least injury reports, Spurrier
comments, etc.  What about the recruiting trail?
Any good rumors?  Any early commitments?

Andy

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: Nebraska defeats Colorado
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 05:10:31 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.221352.13647@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com> m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson) writes:
>
>No but You must admit that the town slants drastically left.

Maybe, but it's still better than being a redneck hangout like Lincoln!

>Man, when you get beat like that just take it, keep your mount shut (you have
							^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
you mean mouth?

>Husker Henderson

Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: alan@tsd.arlut.utexas.edu (Alan Martin)
Subject: Re: Traditional Rivalries
Organization: Applied Research Labs, University of Texas at Austin
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 19:34:29 GMT

oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day) writes:


>Since we are getting to the point in the college football
>season where "Rivals Collide!!!", does anybody have a copy
>of the list of "trophies" that are at stake?

>e.g., Duke vs. UNC for "Victory Bell", the (already played)
>Old Oaken Bucket, the Apple Cup, etc...

Well, according to CBS a couple of years ago, Kansas and Missouri play for
the "Indian War Bonnet", although neither I nor anyone I know associated with
Kansas has ever heard of it.  And, of course, KU and K-State vie annually
for the much coveted Kansas Governor's Cup.  I can just see those 'Huskers
and Sooners turning green with envy over being left out of that competition.


						Al
						alan@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu