HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mdl@phelixsalt (Michael Lynch)
Subject: Bladerunner=>Logan's Run
Reply-To: mdl@phelixsalt (Michael Lynch)
Organization: Bellcore
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 12:52:55 GMT


Favorite movies and books are like good friends.  They have their warts
and shortcomings, but we overlook them.  If we don't -- if we analyze them
and pick at them ad infinitum, they won't be friends very long.  I bought
Bladerunner several years ago, and in spite of all the rantings and ravings
here, it remains one of my favorite movies.  I also have Logan's Run, which
(in terms of special effects, acting, storyline, and you-name-it) is
strictly amateur hour.  But it's another of my favorites.  In fact, I'm
going to change the subject line a tad.  Perhaps I can steer the 
discussion of Bladerunner (will it NEVER end??!!) to Logan's Run.

Mike (Looking for Sanctuary) Lynch
mdl@oscar.bellcore.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Raiders of the Lost Ark: R2D2 & C3P0
From: ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 12:00:58 PDT
Organization: Paradox Alley F&SF BBS 805-492-8789

sieler@allegro.com (Stan Sieler) writes:

> Sorry if this is a FAQ, but can anyone confirm whether or not Raiders
> of the Lost Ark has a cameo appearance of R2D2 and C3P0 (etched on a wall?)?
> If so, in what scene?  We just got the wide-screen laser disc, and have been
> trying to find them.
> 

This is from memory of several years ago, but I think when he is looking
at all the hirogliphics in the map room, on the floor, when he is looking
for the place to put the staff, one of those pictures is that of our
favorite droids.  I haven't checked this in years, but you'll probably
be able to see it on the LD for sure.



-------------------------------------------------------------------
Catherine Beckstead                    ace@kryton.uucp
"Do you want to argue with a can of deodorant that registers
NINE on the Richter scale?"        --Ace, in "Dragonfire"
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.movies:7678 misc.wanted:8808
From: jan@bagend.uucp (Jan Isley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies,misc.wanted
Subject: Brave New World, 1980 TV version, any format
Date: 3 Oct 92 18:07:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: bagend.1992Oct3.180720.29886
Followup-To: poster
Distribution: na
Organization: This space for rent.

Looking for a tape of the 1980 TV production of Brave New World.
I understand that it is not available commercially.  Did anyone
out there tape this that would make a copy for me.

I do not get rec.arts, so email please.

thanks
-- 
Jan Isley   jan@bagend.uucp   gatech.edu!bagend!jan   (404)434-1335
From: rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu (Jeff Bytof)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Is Rachel a BLADERUNNER?
Date: 28 Sep 1992 19:31:24 GMT
Organization: sio
NNTP-Posting-Host: lutherlab.ucsd.edu

Boy, that Rachel can sure handle a gun!  Did Leon in real good!

Wonder where she learned that trick?

;-) 

Jeff Bytof
rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu
From: wyattw@loowit.wr.tek.com (Wyatt Webb;6291592;92-835)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Ridley Scott
Date: 6 Oct 92 18:43:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: loowit.WYATTW.92Oct6114339
	<1992Oct2.032931.5057@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tektronix - Instrument Controllers and Software
In-reply-to: ckt4x@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU's message of 2 Oct 92 03:29:31 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.032931.5057@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> ckt4x@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Genghis Cohen) writes:

   wakesm@sage.cc.purdue.edu  writes:
   > Does anybody have a complete list of Ridley Scott films?

   OK, I think this is complete...

   The Duellists
   Alien
   Blade Runner
   Legend
   Someone To Watch Over Me
   Black Rain
   Thelma And Louise
   1492

   and various commercials, not the least of which is the cool
   first televised ad for Macintosh computers.  It was broadcast
   during the 1984 Olympics and was pretty amazing.
   --
				  Curt  Tsui
			       curt@Virgina.EDU                                  
       "I've got a peculiar weakness for criminals and artists -- neither
		   takes life as it is." -- Stanley Kubrick


Close, but not quite.  The "1984" commercial was broadcast (only once)
during the 1984 SuperBowl game in January.  The only reason I know this
is that I have a copy of a videotape made of the commercial and it has
the SuperBowl on either end of the commercial break.  As far as I know,
it was never shown again. And, unfortunately, Apple does not own the
commercial the ad agency which created it does.

Sorry to be nitpicky, but it is a piece of computer history...

Later,

	-Wyatt
--
=====================================================================
|   wyattw@loowit.wr.tek.com	|  	"Never give up, 	    |
|     Engineers are better	|        never, never, never"	    |
|	   by design		|  		-Ross Perot	    |
+-------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|       Disclaimer: My opinions were bought at a garage sale	    |
=====================================================================
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.movies:7688 rec.arts.movies:29419 alt.cult-movies:8669
From: bx916@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Ross W. Starkey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies,rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Deckard as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Date: 5 Oct 1992 00:59:47 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bx916@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Ross W. Starkey)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, caruso@socrates.umd.edu (John Caruso) says:

>In article <1992Sep30.215705.20802@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> dleibow@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (David E Leibow) writes:
>>As for the unicorn, the origami found at the end need not imply anything 
>>about him having any knowledge of Deckard's dream.
>
>Of course, just a coincidence.  I wonder if anyone even noticed while they
>were screening it?  How surprised they must all have been!
>
>>If it seems a bit like too much of a coincidence that its 
>>a unicorn, well, many directors have taken much more artistic license 
>>than that to symbolially emphasize a thematic point.  If this wasn't 
>>SF nobody would have given it a second thought...
>
>*Sigh*.  It's disspiriting to read through these arguments about Deckard
>not being a replicant...and then come to the unicorn part.  Here's where
>people hem and haw, talk about "coincidences" and ESP, and basically just
>show that they can't explain it at all.  Please, I beg of you, stop the
>ingenuous handwaving.  There are only a few explanations:
>
>     1) Deckard told Gaff about his dream.
>
>     2) Gaff found out about Deckard's dream in some other way.  The only
>        one of these that's hinted at by the film is that he knows about
>        it the same way that Deckard knows about Rachel's memories, i.e.,
>        Deckard is a replicant.
>
>Nothing in the film indicates that 1) happened.  And for 2), we only have
>one explanation offered (by analogy, and explicated above).  Please, unless
>you have something *concrete* to say about other possible explanations for
>the unicorn, don't expect anyone to believe that it was just a coincidence,
>ESP, UFO's, or anything else.
>
>- John


Congratulations!  You've just convinced me that Tyrell's niece is a 
replicant!


:-)

-- 
Whom first, whom later         No one is fool enough to choose war instead of
did you kill in battle,        peace - in peace sons bury fathers, but in war
Patroklos, when the gods       fathers bury sons.  It must have been heaven's
were calling deathward? HOMER  will that this should happen...      HERODOTUS
From: mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Deckard is NOT a Replicant
Date: 30 Sep 92 18:35:48 GMT
Organization: DB and ES Subdivision, TU Vienna

From article <1992Sep30.023833.13966@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au>, by pete@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au (Peter Alexander Merel):
> mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner) writes:
>>The point is not that Deckard is weaker, but that he is TOO WEAK to do
>>his job properly, considering the opposition he is up against.
>>Therefore his being a replicant is not PLAUSIBLE because it would not
>>be a REASONABLE assignment.  
 
> Or, his being a human is not plausible because it would not be a reasonable
> assignment. Cuts both ways.

Since you only get humans with human capabilities, you are pretty much
bound to what Mother Nature delivers.  If you use replicants, then you
have greater latitude, and if you use an experimental model, you would
try to make it survivable, because experimental models tend to be
expensive. As for why they use humans, I do think that policemen's
wages are fairly low.  I do not deny that situations can be easily
constructed such that it would be more useful to use replicants for
Blade Runner work, but that would be another film.
-- 
Markus Stumptner                                mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
University of Technology Vienna                 vexpert!mst@relay.eu.net
Paniglg. 16, A-1040 Vienna, Austria             ...mcsun!vexpert!mst
From: joneil@heretix.East.Sun.COM (kill the lawers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Cameron's cut "Abyss"
Date: 29 Sep 1992 06:06:21 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: joneil@heretix.East.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: heretix.east.sun.com

is this ever going to be released on VHS??? (please, please!!)

john
From: jeffs@almaden.ibm.com (Jeff Schneiter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Sorry about the GIF
Date: 30 Sep 92 16:49:25 GMT
Reply-To: jeffs@almaden.ibm.com (Jeff Schneiter)
Organization: IBM Almaden Research Center

Sorry about distributing the GIF. I do not have access to alt.binaries
and now can not cancel the article.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   Jeff Schneiter   |   jeffs@almaden.ibm.com    |   (408) 927 - 1498     |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   "But I don't feel like feeling        |  Standard Disclaimer.          |
|    Feeling like you                     |  Big Blue allows me to think   |
|    Now I'm in the mirror                |  for myself (so far).          |
|    Now it's getting clear               ----------------------------------
|    I fear that I'm in you"   Soundgarden  _Badmotorfinger_               |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies,rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: fineberg@win31.nas.nasa.gov (Samuel A. Fineberg)
Subject: Re: BR: Raw oysters, boiled dogs, tequila worms, calfskin wallets.
Organization: CSC, NASA Ames Research Center, NAS Division
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 92 19:33:03 GMT
Reply-To: fineberg@nas.nasa.gov

In article <1992Oct6.000331.29015@news.nd.edu>, Richard A. Swift <Richard.A.Swift.1@nd.edu> writes:
|> In article <1aogbkINNcl0@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> Ross W. Starkey,
|> bx916@cleveland.Freenet.Edu writes:
|> >In Blade Runner (all cuts), why would Rachel turn in a guy for giving
|> >her a calfskin wallet?  What's the big deal about calfskin?  Not like
|> >the world's gone veggie or anything... 
|> 
|> 
|> I have to listen a bit more carefully next time... I always thought it
|> was a "cat-skin" wallet. Hmmm....
|> 
|> Rich
Calf skin was right.  In the book people folow a religion called Mercerism
that prohibits any kind of mistreatement of animals.  The V-K test was based on
reactions to the empathy for animals that was part of Mercerism.  Supposedly
androids didn't show the same empathic responses.  

Sam

P.S. all of this is from the book, many things were changed for the movie
and the concept here was never explained in the movie.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: morrow@fnalo.fnal.gov (Ganthet Elmo Gu)
Subject: Re: Heavy Metal II
Organization: Guardians of Elmo
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 23:57:31 GMT
X-Posted-From: fnalo.fnal.gov
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <iq54560@pro-smof.cts.com>, wixer!cactus.org!wixer!pro-smof.cts.com!rfletcher@cactus.org (Robert Fletcher) writes:
>   You CAN copyright titles.

	No, you cannot (Disclaimer:  I am not an intellectual properties
lawyer).  
	Hollywood is a good example of this; different companies in different
eras produce different movies with different stories with the same title.
-- 
"My father is the last of the Mohicans."--John Gotti's daughter Victoria       
  
elmo (morrow@physics.rice.edu,morrow@fnal.fnal.gov)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: pete@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au (Peter Alexander Merel)
Subject: Re: The Meaning of the Unicorn
Organization: AOTC - CSSC
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 00:52:35 GMT

gdg019@cck.coventry.ac.uk (Ridley McIntyre) writes:

>Pete writes:
>>the obvious similiarities in dress and mannerism between him and Ford (the 
>>name! what a giveaway) we could speculate that Deckard's implants are Holden's
>>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Explain please?
>
>>Ah, cultural bias, please excuse. In oz there have been two major local makes 
>>of car for a long time. Ford, which you probably have heard of, and Holden,

>Oh, I get it, so if there was a dog called Rover in the film, too, this would
>also be a giveaway 8*).

So sue me if I left off a smiley. Sheesh.

>I just read somewhere in one of my lecture notes that this kind of speculation
>is bad for ANY movie, as it means we can make up any bullshit after seeing a
>film a million times

Trouble is, where do you draw the line? I mean, when you come down to it, 
film is not reality. You speculate, draw inferences, hypothesize, fill in, 
interpret, and model and re-model just to understand the basic continuity
and characters presented to you. As we've seen time and again here, what is
a natural and logical inference for one person is a perverse meaningless
stab in the dark for another. Now I may not agree with someone's speculation,
but I'll fight to the death for their right to speculate it. Or something like
that.

>Now, I don't want to start a flame war, but why do so many of my friends
>think that ALIEN is boring?...

Good question. Desensitized by video-games and slasher flicks? Could it be
their diet? Perhaps they don't get enough sleep, or their mothers didn't spank
them often enough. All I know is that the original Alien flick still scares
the crap out of this little black duck.

-- 
Internet: pete@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au   UUCP: {uunet,mcvax}!munnari!cssc-syd!pete
Snail: 1/18-20 Orion Road, Lane Cove NSW 2066 Australia    Phone: +61 2 911 3130
Theftright Peter A. Merel (T) 1992. Rights to all replies, followups, originals,
sources and anything else I can get my hands on reserved.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: pete@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au (Peter Alexander Merel)
Subject: Re: Deckard as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Organization: AOTC - CSSC
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 01:56:12 GMT

bx916@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Ross W. Starkey) writes:
>Pete writes:
>>Sorry. If conspiracy, then Eldon Tyrell. If not, then not.

>Eldon Tyrell  = A
>Conspiracy = X

>You are trying to prove X.

No I am not. I am asserting not(not(X)) - that is, as I've said over and over,
the evidence is ambiguous, and either interpretation of Deckard's nature is 
valid. The only valid counterargument to this is a counterexample.

>If X (the thing you are trying to prove?!?), then A.
>If not X, then not A.

You have misread the thread. To expand my statement up above:

If there was a conspiracy, then Eldon Tyrell supplied Deckard's apartment, job,
photos, etc. If there was no conspiracy, then Eldon Tyrell did not do this. The
evidence in the movie does not confirm or deny a conspiracy. Your milage may
vary.

>A (Eldon Tyrell exists), therefore, X!
>This is a completely nonsensical argument.

At last we agree :-)

-- 
Internet: pete@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au   UUCP: {uunet,mcvax}!munnari!cssc-syd!pete
Snail: 1/18-20 Orion Road, Lane Cove NSW 2066 Australia    Phone: +61 2 911 3130
"Nothing is pulling it. Nothing is pushing it. It must be devil's work!"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: drmres27@ucs.usl.edu (Mejia Pablo)
Subject: LawnMower Man
Organization: Univ. of Southwestern La., Lafayette
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 09:00:28 GMT

  Okay folks, the 20 million dollar question is:

  Is the video release of "Lawnmower Man" the same cut as the theatrical
  release??  I only saw it in the theater, but my roomates (who saw both)
  insist that the intro sequence with the hyper-monkey is completely
  different in the 2 different versions.

  Any comments??

  Specifically, they say that the hyper-monkey meets the Lawnmower Man in
  the vid release.  I remember the hyper-monkey dying in the lab in the 
  theatrical release.  Anyone else seen both????

                       drmres27 the curious. 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: jfarmer@fraser.sfu.ca (Jason Michael Farmer)
Subject: Bladerunner
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 16:02:41 GMT

Does anyone know where Bladerunner was filmed?  I've heard rumours that parts
of it were filmed here at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada.

Can anyone support that? Refute it? Anything?

Jason Farmer
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, Bristish Columbia, Canada
jfarmer@fraser.sfu.ca
From: donnell@polyp.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: LawnMower Man
Date: 29 Sep 92 21:01:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: news2.1992Sep29.210114.24788
Organization: none

In article <1992Sep29.090028.6000@usl.edu> drmres27@ucs.usl.edu (Mejia Pablo) writes:
>  Okay folks, the 20 million dollar question is:
>
>  Is the video release of "Lawnmower Man" the same cut as the theatrical
>  release??  I only saw it in the theater, but my roomates (who saw both)
>  insist that the intro sequence with the hyper-monkey is completely
>  different in the 2 different versions.
>
>  Any comments??
>
>  Specifically, they say that the hyper-monkey meets the Lawnmower Man in
>  the vid release.  I remember the hyper-monkey dying in the lab in the 
>  theatrical release.  Anyone else seen both????
>
>                       drmres27 the curious. 

The opening and some of the character stuff has been changed in the video 
release. No extra effects that I could see. But I thought Pierce Brosnan's
girlfriend split about a third of the way into the movie, and in the vid
she is still there for Job to control when the Feds attack. It's good both
ways, the extra stuff doesn't add a whole lot you didn't know.

					--Judex--
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.movies:7721 sci.physics:15980
From: che238n@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies,sci.physics
Subject: SLAC and ET
Date: 6 Oct 92 09:40:17 +1000
Organization: Computer Centre, Monash University, Australia

Last Sunday night ET was shown on TV in Australia.
In the closing credits the producers thanked the Stanford Linear Accelerator
Centre.
Can anyone explain what they had to do with this film? Was it in case Drew
Barrymore had a sudden, uncontrollable urge to perform a quick particle physics
experiment?
On a serious note, did they have something to do with the multitude of
radiation suits used?

Cheers

David

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies,rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: brian@quake.sylmar.ca.us (Brian K. Yoder)
Subject: Re: Deckard as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Organization: Quake Public Access
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 07:36:12 GMT

In article <10538@baird.cs.strath.ac.uk> imcc@cs.strath.ac.uk (Iain McCord) writes:
>Peter Alexander Merel (pete@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au) wrote:
 
>: The crux of the matter is whether or not Scott intended Deckard's nature to 
>: be ambiguous. Given the years of debate on the issue, with no resolution 
>: either way, I think you'd have to agree that the ambiguity is intentional.

>  I thought that Deckard said he retired because he was begining to emphasise
>with the replicants.  It's common for good hunters/cops to learn to think
>like their prey.  Deckard was one of the best, until he became too involved.
>  Unicorns are a fertility symbol,  this could have been what Gaff intended
>when he left it.  This would be ironic as androids are probably infertile.
>He may also have access to Deckards psychiatric records.

Considering the way Deckard was being tossed around by the replicants throughout
the movie, I would say that he couldn't have been a replicant himself.  The
only question that remained for me is how the other cop knew about the unicorn.
One explanation would be that HE was a replicant and has Deckard's memories
implanted, although this seems unlikely given that Deckard didn't know all
the languages the other guy did.

--Brian
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.starwars
From: naoursla@eos.ncsu.edu (NORMAN ALAN OURSLAND)
Subject: Re: How'd He Do It?
Originator: naoursla@c00372-247dan.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: naoursla@eos.ncsu.edu (NORMAN ALAN OURSLAND)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 00:41:47 GMT


Perhaps Luke had been hanging onto that antenna for a lot longer than the movie 
actually showed.

Alan Oursland
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.starwars:6596 rec.arts.startrek.misc:9842
From: jogle@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (Jim Ogle (Ks. Jim))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.starwars,rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Borg implants mentioned in Heir to the Empire?
Date: 30 Sep 92 08:22:22 GMT
Organization: National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro NM

In article <mumble> subbarao@fc.hp.com (Kartik Subbarao) writes:

>So what's the deal here? On page 50 (and in a couple other areas) of "Heir to 
>the Empire" (the Lucasfilm-authorized continuation of the Star Wars saga by 
>Timothy Zahn) they refer ``Borg implants'' on spaceships. Is something fishy
>here? I thought the `Borg' was a Star TREK initiated thing, not Star WARS.

"Borg" is just a contraction of "cyborg" so I doubt that either Star
Trek or Star Wars can lay claim to starting the concept.  But between
the two, I'm pretty sure the Star Wars reference to borgs came first;
it was in the role-playing game material before ST:TNG met the Borg
and Lando's assistant on Cloud City might have been called a 'borg in
the novelization (he's called that in the RPG at any rate) of "The
Empire Strikes Back".




-- 
Kansas Jim (Jim Ogle, TORG guru)                               /|
jogle@aoc.nrao.edu (NRAO-VLBA, Socorro New Mexico)           o| |-
"I'd be apathetic if I cared."                              /|\\|
From: 907fanjoy@gw.wmich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.starwars
Subject: Re: Z-95?
Date: 4 Oct 92 12:44:46 EST
Organization: Western Michigan University

In article <1992Oct2.105037.13286@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu>, cbarilleaux@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Cyberpreppie) writes:
>
>> ______
> 
> 	wait--is that the craft Luke used to fly ("I used to bullseye....in my
> old....they're not bigger than 2 meters)? If that is the case, Luke was playing
> with a model of on in ANH just after he got the 'droids but before he saw the
> message from Leia.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I. Charles Barilleaux III                 occasionally know at Miami Univ
> CBARILLEAUX@MIAVX1.ACS.MUOHIO.EDU         as Cyberpreppie.

	No, Luke did not mention Z-95s.  That model he was playing with 
could not possibly have been any sort of fighter or airspeeder because
it was too bulky.  
	However, said model bears a striking resemblence to the lambda-
class shuttles seen in ROTJ, but with a flatter nose.

	--Dave "Y-Wings and Boba Fett are Cool"  Fanjoy
From: alfordjj@fe624.cc.purdue.edu (Jared Alford)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.starwars
Subject: Re: Star Wars soundtrack
Date: 30 Sep 92 20:34:17 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Purdue University

In article <ukoga.717450894@mcl>, ukoga@mcl.ucsb.edu ("Indiana" Koga) writes:
|> In <lc3s5oINNk4m@muleshoe.cs.utexas.edu> hofle@cs.utexas.edu (Andrew Christopher Hofle) writes:
|> 
|> [Text deleted]
|> 
|> On an off-tangent, how many people are pissed at Polydor/Polygram for putting
|> less music on the CD soundtracks as opposed to the cassette versions?  Namely
|> "The Empire Strikes Back" and "Return Of The Jedi" soundtracks? 
|> 
|> 
|> 							--"Indiana" Koga

	I sure am.  I used to own the LP version of TESB and even THAT had more
	music on it than the CD.

					Jared