From: bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson)
Subject: Re: Vikings Playoff chances/QB
Reply-To: bergerson@mayo.edu
Organization: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 16:48:40 GMT


In article <1992Dec29.154508.12544@ttsi.lonestar.org>, hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org (Huett Bishop) writes:
->From: hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org (Huett Bishop)
->Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
->Subject: Re: Vikings Playoff chances/QB
->
->In article <1992Dec28.135428.11565@hellgate.utah.edu> twolf@cs.utah.edu (Tom Wolf) writes:
->>>In article <13773@express>, currie@Software.Mitel.COM (Kim Currie) writes:
->>>->COME ON!  Buerlein???  Tomczak???  These guys are no better (possibly
->              ^^^^^^^^
->Yeah, right. The QB that most coaches said they would rather have as their
->backup.
->
->The backup who took Dallas into the playoff last year with a 5 game winning
->streak, starting with the thrashing of the Redskins. At RFK.
->
->>>->worse) than what the Vikings have now.  I agree the Vikings can improve
->>>->themselves by upgrading the QB position, but I don't think the rest of
->>>->the NFC is `shivering' at the prospect.  They still have questionable
->>>->special teams, a running back who fumbles waaay too often, and an
->>>->overly conservative offensive scheme.
->>>->        
->>>->Kim
->>>->
->>>Are you a guy or a gal???  Either way, you don't know what you are talking 
->>>about.
->>
->What the H**l is this? My wife knows more about football, college or pro than
->about 75% of men. She knows individual and team stats, coaches, players and
->where they came from, how they did in college, Super Bowl Stats, the play-off
->tie breakers and an infinite amount of strategy, offensive and defensive.
->
->Whenever we enter a football pool she has about 90% accuracy and can tell
->you the playoff picture during each Sunday game and what the affect of each
->game has on the playoff picture.
->
->So don't think that males have a lock on the love of football.
->
->Personally I believe you don't think at all.
->
->>
->>What does this person's sex have to do with their analysis? What, men can't
->>discuss things rationally? Or women can't? I think you are out of line here.
->>Leave a person's sex out of the discussion and just respond to the posting.
->>
->>Well, that is enough flaming, you will probably get more publicly on the net.
->>I have to admit though, I think your posting merits a public apology.
->                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
->Hear Hear! I agree.
->>
->>Tom Wolf
->

why don't you two guys ( tom wolf and huett bishop) fuck off and get a sense 
of humor.  My remark had nothing to do with the sex of the person.
In case you haven't heard, Kim can be a male or female name.  Since I cannot
see the person, I would like to know with whom I am conversing.

I give up.  You guys need to get a life.

--
*******************************************************************************
Chad D. Bergerson                            Internet: bergerson@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic                                  Voice: (507) 255-7567
200 First Street SW                          FAX: (507) 255-5484
Mail Stop 2D-334 STM            "In my dream I was drowning my sorrows  
Rochester, MN  55905             But my sorrows they learned to swim..." - U2
*******************************************************************************