HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: soc.culture.asian.american
Followup-To: 
From: g9utxu@fnma.COM (Tanin Uthayanaka)
Reply-To: g9utxu@fnma.COM
Organization: Fannie Mae
Subject: Re: bimbos
Keywords: 

In article 11254@fuug.fi, an3879@anon.penet.fi () writes:
>I know several Chinese girls.  It seems that all the Chinese girls
>that I know who grew up or were born here in America are bimbos.
>They wear tons of makeup, use disgusting perfume, smile too much
>(I'm talking about fake and insincere smiles), wear clothes that
>are too tight and skirts that are too high, and just all around
>too gung ho American.
>
>I hate them, every time I see one of them I just want to throw up.
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
>Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
>and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.


It is obvious that this man has a problem. At first I wanted to ignore him 
'cause I'm sure he just wanted attention. But such a racist remarks should ban 
him from having access to this or any other news group. If anyone could help 
in determining where in the Ohio area this man is and contact the proper authority 
to disallow him from using the network.

TU
From: jasonl@rigel.cs.pdx.edu (Jason Liu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: test, please ignore
Date: 5 Jan 93 19:30:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: pdxgate.6653
Distribution: pdx.edu

this is a test. It is only a test.

+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Jason H. Liu                 | InterNet : jasonl@rigel.cs.pdx.edu         | 
| Computer Science Major       | Computer Action Term                       |
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: lzheng@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (lian zheng)
Subject: Re: Toycott Update 1/4/93
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 00:38:10 GMT


I was trying to say that the people in Toycot are really doing harm 
to China, knowingly or not.  

Lian Zheng, at IU.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: sdcadm@longhorn.corp.sun.com (SDC Administrator)
Subject: Death in China's New Economic Zones
Organization: The Ohio State University; Department of Phyiscs
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 23:31:24 GMT

Death in China's New Economic Zones
---------------------------------------------------
Linda Pfeifer   (Facts from China Labor Notes, 12/92)
 
 
Chinese Communist officials are turning a blind eye
to occupational hazards in China's new economic
zones.  In the first 6 months of 1992, 81 workers
at three toy factories in Zhuhai, Guangdong were
injured by toxic substances - four died; 42 garmant
factory workers in Dalian inhaled poisonous dyes
and became ill; 12 workers became ill on the first
day of work at a Qinhuangdao joint venture.
 
An investigation of 657 joint ventures showed that only
26% had been examined for occupational safety;  only
28% had necessary protective devices on their
equipment.  When hazardous worksites in 34 enterprises
were investigated, only 6 fulfilled government
requirements.
 
Some foreign investors will not tell Chinese workers
the contents of substances they are handling.  Instead,
codes or numbers are used to represent poisonous
chemicals.  This makes it difficult for hospitals to
save victims because the type of poison is a mystery.
 
 
 
(NOTE: It is very difficult to secure information about
China's working conditions, given that Chinese officials,
foreign investors, and Chinese businesses are all making
so much money in these new economic zones. The above data
was revealed when someone leaked sections of the Health
Supervision Report.)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: 90908648@bradford.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Yan Xing and Qi Gong, Is It Science?
Organization: The Ohio State University; Department of Phyiscs
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 18:19:31 GMT

xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) write:


>Yan Xing claimed that his Qi Gong could change the structure
>of molecule of water by remote "Qi".
>
>Yan Xing claimed that his Qi Gong could change the nuclear
>structure more effective than accelerator.

Obviously, Yan Xiang's /----     can be used to solve the future
                         --
                       ----/
                          /
                          \___/
                               
problem of energy shortage. But the /---   should be carefully
                                     --
                                    ---/
                                       \_/

controlled. A controlled nuclear fusion is much safer than an

uncontrolled one. Also the radiation level around his home 

should be minitored, in case he should release some neutrons

while changing the nuclear structure. 

/----          +-+ /--/
 ----    __    | |  
-----/   __    | |  |        , I think.
    /          +-+  /\
    \_/            /  \




Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: xiaoxian@little-jimmy.cs.unlv.edu (Xiaogiang Gong)
Subject: Latest J-1 Extension Policy Needed!
Organization: UNLV Computer Science and Electrical Engineering
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 05:23:25 GMT

Keywords: 

  Unofficial information source says that a new policy of INS has been in effect which allows people with J-1 status have a chance to apply for status extension up to six years.

  Is this true? Could someone out there on the net confirm or decline it? I desperately need the confirmed information to make a decision.

  Thank you in advance.

P.S. My email address: xiaoxian@ee.unlv.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: rdu@iastate.edu (Runqing Du)
Subject: Need help to obtain addresses of mail-order jewllery company
Keywords: jewllery
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:38:51 GMT


I am considering to buy jewllery from some mail-order company. Can someboby give me some addresses in the States? BTW, is it a good idea to buy jewllery through mail order? Better email to rdu@iastate.edu. Thanx.
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Date: Monday, 11 Jan 1993 16:14:48 PST
From: Charles Young <YOUNG@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: UN resolution of No Fly Zone and China
Distribution: na

In article <C0poot.7tp@apollo.hp.com>, zl@apollo.hp.com says:
>
>In article <C0p90r.Myw@apollo.hp.com> I wrote:
>>Sorry if this question has been asked and answered.
>>
>>The mass media here keeps mentioning the so called
>>No Fly Zone enforced in Southern Iraq is an UN resolution.
>>But from what I read in a local chinese newspaper, there
>>is not such an UN resolution. It is only an agreement
>>among US, Briton, and Frence.
>>
>>Due to the unreliability of both the chinese newspapers
>>and US news media, here is my question, is there really
>>such an UN resolution? If yes, what did China (and Rusia)
>>vote?
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>I got an answer from ******@ecn.purdue.edu, hope this helps:
>>From what I heard on CNN, there is NO specific resolution passed by UN
>>on the issue of "no fly zone". There is a resolution on "protecting the
>>kurds and shiai muslims in southern Iraq". So the U.S. and France and England
>>now argue that that resolution justifies the so called "no fly zone" since
>>Iraqi war planes are used to attack the kurds population.
>>So far, UN seem to be behind the U.S. interpretation, but there is no
>specific
>>mention of no fly zone in any UN resolution.
>
>Some minor questions from me: are Kurds in northern Iraq close to Turkey and
>Shiai muslims in southern Iraq close to Iran? Is there any similar enforcement
>in northern Iraq to "protect ... from ..."?

Yes. Many Kurds are in northern Iraq. US and its allies are enforcing a
similar no-fly zone in the north as well as south Iraq.



Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:33955 talk.politics.china:3558
From: yuanj@ucbeh.san.uc.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,talk.politics.china
Subject: Rumor: U.S. Selling Nuke Sub to Taiwan?
Date: 5 Jan 93 09:34:26 EST
Distribution: world
Organization: Univ. of Cincinnati

There is a rumor that the U.S. is going to sell nuclear submarines (6 of them)
to Taiwan.  Can someone confirm this? 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,talk.politics.china
From: lwang@mariner.amc.edu.au (Luo Wang)
Subject: Re: Rumor: U.S. Selling Nuke Sub to Taiwan?
Organization: Australian Maritime College
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 23:57:53 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.093426.2367@ucbeh.san.uc.edu>, yuanj@ucbeh.san.uc.edu writes:
>
>There is a rumor that the U.S. is going to sell nuclear submarines (6 of them)
>to Taiwan.  Can someone confirm this? 

I doubt it. But I hope it is true.
-- 

Luo Wang                       |     "No one is a hero in his own nation." |
Phone: 61 03 260 841           |                                           |
       61 03 265 053           |      Sir General John Monash              |
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.indian
From: tylee@leety.austin.ibm.com (Ty Lee)
Subject: Re: Religious conflict in India
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 15:52:36 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <1993Jan7.175631.16530@ryn.mro4.dec.com> verma@pfeast.enet.dec.com (Virendra Verma) writes:
>
>	Hey, why you guys are killing Buddhists in Tibet? We Indians are
>	taking them back. Being good, morally and ethically, is no good. 
>	Actions are important than showing off so called 'respect'. People
>	have emotions that is why they react the way they do. There is no
>	cultural influence. This is our way of talking. It doesn't mean
>	that we want to kill each other like the Chinese are doing to
>	our brothers in Tibet.
>

Tibet has never been a territory of India before and now. And it will never
be after. The killing is for the quelling of the unrest in Tibet, although
I don't agree with what the communist Chinese did in this regard.
Merely saying annexing Tibet shows the territorial ambition of India over
its neighboring coutries, like Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, ever
since the Independence of India.

Being brutal, immorally to its own people is not a business of the India
people. They should look into their own proplems carefully before picking
on others. 

>-- Virendra Verma

-- 
/* The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of IBM's.         *\
 * Take care and have a nice day.                                            *
\* Ty Lee                                                                    */
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: Sanyee_Tang@mindlink.bc.ca (Sanyee Tang)
Subject: Re: A New York Times Article on Hong Kong
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 00:25:01 GMT

    In <1993Jan9.211424.13016@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> (9 Jan 1993) Zhigang Yang
forwarded a New York Times article,

> The dispute [between Britain and China] is significantly fueled by
> competition between Britain's waning commercial interests and China's
> surging entrepreneurial capitalism.
> ...
> Independent local newspapers have reported charges by U.S. businessmen
> that American and Hong Kong Chinese companies have been victimized by
> Pattern Government political decisions that favour British interests at
> their expenses.

    That reminds me an article I read a couple months ago in the local
newspaper.  A Canadian commercial consul in Hong Kong complained that
Canadian businessmen are not aggressive enough to seek contracts for
Hong Kong's projected $22 billion airport and container port.  He said,
Hong Kong has the most transparent procurement procedures in the world.
Some Canadian companies complain that the Hong Kong government favours
British bidders.  He personally investigated several cases but found
none of them stands.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: bihkyan@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Yang Yuanxin)
Subject: Re: Bosnia Rape, What Could the World Do?
Organization: Educational Computing Network
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 21:06:19 GMT

In article <1993Jan4.164241.2995@news.acns.nwu.edu> carl_@nwu.edu  writes:
>In article <C03n1x.CEu@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> bihkyan@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Yang Yuanxin)  
>writes:
>> In article <1992Dec30.235136.4719@news.acns.nwu.edu> carl_@nwu.edu  writes:
>> >In article <C03HJs.8qL@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> bihkyan@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Yang  
>Yuanxin)  
>> >writes:
>> >>    I didn't finish reading it, because I just DON't BELIEVE IT IS TRUE!
>> >> 
>> >>    If people in that country(former Yogoslavia) can commit this kind of
>> >> crime, I can't trust the woman who told the story.....
>> >> 
>> >> YY
>> >
>> >You are right. The news is not from People's Daily. It is a lie. Only  
>People's  
>>  If people's daily tell the same story, I will believe it's true.
>>  but so far I haven't seen PD's report yet.
>> 
>> >Daily has truth. You don't even need to comment on this. Everybody knows  
>that  
>> >only People's Daily speaks of truth.
>> 
>>   Mostly.
>> 
>> > Long live Mao Zhuxi!
>>   
>>   I shout this many decades ago.        
>>   Chairman Mao stands for honest, justice, truth, progress, correctness,
>>   peace, love, care..... that's the reason you guys hate him.
>> 
>>   
>
>You are right again. Mao stands for honest and justice because he killed many  
>of his dear comrades during power struggles. Mao stands for progrss because  
>China's economy is still left behind and millions of people starved to death in  
>early 1960s. Mao stands for correctness, peace and love because he started the  
>Culture Revolution and prosecuted millions of people. 

   Mao was not the only one who is responsible for all this(which may
not be truth).

   Actually every Chinese is responsible for it. (not me though, I was
too young then).

>
>I admire your way of thinking. Oh, of course, I forget, you might have benefit  
>a lot from the above Mao's great deeds.

  That is your "Xiao Ren Zhi Xin", and that is your mentality, judge
anything based on your own personal benefition. I, like all members in
my family,do not have this kind of mentality.

>
>Carl
From: ustw@emory.edu (Tao Wang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: test
Date: 11 Jan 93 18:16:13 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

this is a test
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
From: zhuh@athena.mit.edu (Hui Zhu)
Subject: Re: PARTRIOTS FOR TAIWAN
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Distribution: world,local
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 03:51:09 GMT

In article <C0r5zr.sC@rex.uokhsc.edu>, u235@rex.uokhsc.edu (Yung-Jin Lee) writes:
|> In article <1993Jan11.181047.4237@arizona.edu> raymond@jupiter.ame.arizona.edu (Raymond Man) writes:
|> >Some more weapons for Taiwan: according to Aviation Week &ST, Jan 4,
|> >Raytheon is in direct negotiation with Taiwan for the sale of about
|> >$1.2-billion worth of Patriot fire units and missiles.
|> >
|> >That much money probably comes to about a dozen fire units and
|> >700 or 800 missiles. The missiles will be Pac-2, improved in
|> >range and altitude over the Desert Storm ones.
|> >
|> 	Please keep us posted about this kind of news.  Does
|> anyone know when CCP is going to close U.S. consulate this time (just
|> kidding)?  Superrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!
|> 
|> YJ


I really donot know when Chinese government will close US consulate this time. 
But
I do know when US closed its Consulte/Embassy in Taiwan. 
I also know South Korea closed its Consulte/Embassy in Taiwan pretty recently. :)

Isn't that supeRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR,  dude?:) 
If you forget all this, leave me a note, I will be glad to teach this piece of
modern history. :)
I will certainly keep you informed by posting this kind of good news. :)

By the way, I also would like to tell you that the French Consulate closed by 
Chinese government will open in Taiwan next month. 
NOT! :)
From: hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: CCP is China's hope
Date: 4 Jan 93 21:49:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: serval.1993Jan4.214952.11258
Organization: School of EECS, Washington State University

In article <1i9avvINNm5j@flash.pax.tpa.com.au>, anon.121@pax.tpa.com.au writes:
|> 
|> CCP is China's hope.

Yes. I agree.

|> 
|> This is the truth - like it or not.
|> It will ends only in the hands of itself - 
|> no outside power can bring it to an end.
|> 
|> IFCSS and D-fighters are nothing but a bad, mad, sad story.
|>

Just a thought. What if someone from IFCSS, D-fighters or other Chineses
gets into CCP and changes it, is it from inside or outside? Is that possible?


H.J. 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: s075198@bayes.carleton.ca (junliu)
Subject: Re: Yan Xing and Qi Gong, Is It Science?
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 17:40:39 GMT

In <C0AJFM.DrL@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:

>I am sure many Chinese people are crazy about Qi Gong and Yan Xing.
>Chinese have been crazy for many idiological things during the last
>few decades. To name a few: the water drinking movement (one drinks
>three bowl of water in the morning and can heal every desease),
>the magical "red tea" (hong2 cha2 jun3), the throwing hand movement
>(shuai3 shou3 cao1) and so on. Not to mention the political craziness
>of Mao's time and thereafter.

How could you forgot to mention the most bizarre one: injecting chicken 
blood (Ji Xue) into your vein to cure anything (or nothing?).

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li)
Subject: Re: Bosnia Rape, What Could the World Do?
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 03:12:22 GMT

In article <C0CLAJ.2K4@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> bihkyan@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Yang Yuanxin) writes:
>  That is your "Xiao Ren Zhi Xin", and that is your mentality, judge
>anything based on your own personal benefition. I, like all members in
>my family,do not have this kind of mentality.

I think most people jedge a leader first according to his personal
interests. Other things are secondary. But that is not unfair. In fact,
that is normal.
From: stlin@stevelin.Eng.Sun.COM (Steven Lin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Rumor: U.S. Selling Nuke Sub to Taiwan?
Date: 8 Jan 1993 22:57:41 GMT
Organization: Sun
NNTP-Posting-Host: stevelin

In article <8JAN199314253238@jane.uh.edu> math1pu@jane.uh.edu (Douglas Luo) writes:
>In article <ROTEN.93Jan8130511@cuba.gsfc.nasa.gov> (Charles Roten) writes...
>> 
>>>Taiwan unlikely will survive the attack, but people in Taiwan
>>>want to make sure that PRC will pay a heavy price which they hope
>>>will discourage PRC from launching such an attack.
>> 
> It is still a
>possibility (a slim one, but can't be ignored) that the PLA could wipe  
>out Taiwan's Air Force with their tactical nuclear weapons, in which case
>PLAAF would enjoy total air supremacy. Finally, with over one hundred
>submarines in the PLA navy, a naval blockade by these subs only would  
>make life difficult for Taiwan. 
>
After ended the cold war, the CCP has no threat from Russian, therefore
the CCP is capable to launch a stupid mission, all out PLAAF, to attack
Taiwan following a long range missile attack (though it may be far from
the target). ROC has forseen the possiblity, so the Chia-shan project
has been completed to eliminate the possibility. If the PLAAF dare to try
out ROC's defence capability, it may be 1:10 this time (comparision to
1:8 in 60's). This means a few thousand airfighters of PLAAF is not a 
match to a few hundred of ROC AF. 

Besides, the ROC mid-range missile is capable to hit the right spot like
Shanghai, Hangchow, Xiamen, Guangchow,.... Still, ROC needs to sustain
a long term blockade or air raid. Therefore, buying possible western
weapons is absolutely necessary, not to attack but to defend ROC.
From: LXH108@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Cannibalism in Guangxi during the Cultural Revolution
Date: 8 Jan 93 20:52:03 GMT
 <1993Jan8.003139.16813@mtu.edu> <lkrh9aINNiuj@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>
Organization: Penn State University


    Both party, CCP and KMT, did lot of things unbelieveble if you
discuss them under current situation. But they are changing. KMT
is no longer a Gua1 Min2 Dang3 (robbery party). CCP is no longer
a political movement party. Bo th of them are making their people's
life better now. Actually the living standard are skyrocketing in
mainland china. Don't mislead people out side of mainland China by
using the exagerated old facts. Cultural revolution did killed
a lot people. But how many people did KMT killed in early 20s and 30s?
How many people did USA (d-people's god father,no matter USA does what)
kill during many wars? It's useless talking about those garbage.
We understand Mr. Zheng Yi needs money and reputation. But come on,
don't take the advantage of the fact that people out side of the mainland
believe anything you create if story is gainst CCP. There lot of people
don't believe the communist ideaology but support CCP. If democracy
does land on the mainland, China would be bomb or trash can like other
socialist-transit-to-capitalist country.
You need democracy, you pay the price. You may want to pay it but it
is so expensive that you d-people can not afford.
I took part in 89 movement and on the side of d-people. Next time this
kind of things happen, I will suggest government not using guns, using
bombs instead.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: fskanes@kean.ucs.mun.ca
Subject: chinese burial money?/
Organization: Memorial University. St.John's Nfld, Canada
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 19:49:20 GMT

Hello, I hope that someone can help me with the following query. i am 
trying to find out about the origin of burial money. I apologize if I
have not worded this properly. Please E-mail direct .
     fskanes@kean.ucs.mun.ca
From: lix@thames.bu.edu (Xiaowen Li)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Qi Gong experiment from QingHua Univ., Beijing
Date: 5 Jan 93 21:08:54 GMT
Organization: Boston University

In article <C0D5x8.K4r@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
>In article <93004.122522IO11043@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> Robert Pan <IO11043@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes:
>>
>>Many of those Qi Gong experiments may be considered the highest national
>>secreats. There was a research group at Tsinhua University called
>
>I wish China would not rely on Qi Gong for its defense. This
>reminds the novel "Jing4 Yang2 Qiu1" in which "Hongqianghui"
>people shouted "Dao1 Qiang1 Bu2 Ru4!" marching forward. Still they
>all got shot :-).

What is "Jing4 Yang2 Qiu1"? A fiction about Miss Lan Rong? I think
it is well written, but not famous. Maybe there is some unfavourite
background of the author or the hero/heroin?

About "Dao1 Qiang1 Bu2 Ru4", you know, boxer masters claimed so 90
years ago, and got a lot of followers. Well, the then ShanDong
governor said, "let's try." The master then sent about ten Boxers
to be shot. After shooting, all boxers were dead. Then Shangdong
governor oedered Boxer illegal. All boxers then fellow their master
fleeing to HeBei.

The master explained to his disciples why the ten Boxer were shot
dead. "They did not follow my teaching," he said. "I told them not
to have any sex before the trial, they apparently did not obey me.
So their 'Yuan Qi' was leaking. They deserved death."

Facing such followers, my principle is to tell them once: that is
cheating. Then I'll try not to argue with them.

But it is an interesting question in our culture, what is the root
for such large scale cheating's success?
-- 
The SOS China Education Fund is a non-political, non-profit and independent
organization to raise money promoting the education in rural China. All donations
are tax-deductable. Make checks or money orders payable to: "SOS China Education
Fund"; c/o Jie KANG, 2610 E. 5th Pl, Apt. 1, Tulsa, OK74104, USA.