From: fjs@vulcan.ksu.ksu.edu (Frank J Sereno)
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.metal,alt.rock-n-roll.metal.heavy
Subject: Re: Motley Crue and their GREATNESS
Date: 7 Oct 1992 14:02:48 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: vulcan.ksu.ksu.edu


>In article <Bvo2qA.3Av@math.uwaterloo.ca>, amgaudra@neumann.uwaterloo.ca (Alain M. Gaudrault) writes...
>>In article <5OCT199210581183@phobos.ucc.umass.edu> s9877751@phobos.ucc.umass.edu (s9877751) writes:
>>>In article <14075.2acc5080@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>, farrell@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes...
>>>
>>>.
>>>
>>	First off, I think it goes without saying that most of the people who
>>are reading this are thinking: "Well, here goes yet another 12 year old 
>>pre-pubescent snot".  But of course, none of us are actually saying it out 
>>loud ;-)  The whole point of this method of communication is to impart points
>>of view, personal impr 
>>>OK, where do you get off saying that Vince's voice sucks???!!  He's got one of
>>>the best, if not the best metal voice of all time.  With a name like Margie,
>>>I can see how you dream up these delusions, but please spare the rest of us
>>>from the observation of your stupidity.  Motley Crue, or Vince, are in no
>>>way comparable to Kiss, Poison, Great White, or Warrant.  So, go listen to your
>>>REM albums and leave the rest of us alone.
>>>
>>	Vince Neil just doesn't have what it takes to be considered a "GREAT"
>>or even a "GOOD" vocalist.  I'm not saying that it should take away from your
>>enjoyment of Motley Crue's music (Hell, even I'M a fan of their first two
>>albums, and I'm a death/thrash fanatic!!!), but don't be spewing off comments
>>which deep down, you know aren't true.  You can't tell me that by listening
>>to Vince Neil and Geoff Tate side to side, music aside, you still think that
>>Vince is better.  I don't think ANYBODY is that tone deaf.  The whole point is,
>>lay off other people's views if you can't say anything in a calm, respectable
>>manner.  Besides (flame on!) you have the gall to tell somebody to "leave the
>>rest of us" alone, implying that you, a listener of Motley Crue IS ONE OF US??
>>I don't think so :-)  I think the majority here will gladly take in Margie and
>>leave you behind, so watch that silly little mouth of yours.  (oh yeah, flame
>>off)
>> >
>Hey, fuck off pal.  I listen to anything and everything that's heavy, and if
>it wasn't for bands like Motley Crue we wouldn't have the type of music we
>have today.  I was just pissed off that someone could inlcude Vince Neil's
>voice on their top 5 most hated list, and leave a band like Firehouse off
>the list.  Vince Neil, by the way, has a really cool voice.  Can you picture
>anybody else singing Dr. Feelgood, or Girls, Girls, Girls or Wildside worth
>a shit?? I don't think so.  Oh well.  I don't lack maturity, I just seldom
>choose to show it--that's my decision, so shut up.  Try listening to Goatlord,
>and play Acid Orgy at volume 8-10 for two days straight--it really works.
>
>-matt


In reference to your posting, "...if it wasn't for bands like Motley Crue we
wouldn't have the type of music we have today....", I would like to add my input
if you will..................




HEY PAL....LOOK AT THE CRAP WE HAVE TODAY THANKS TO THESE GUYS!!!!
                       ^^^^ 


And, by the way, I wouldn't want anyone else singing 'Dr. Feelgood', 'Girls,
Girls, Girls', or 'Wildside' because one Glam/Poser/Glitter-boy is enough for
me!!!    


.........Anyone else...........
.........HOME SWEET HOME.......REAL TALENT AT WORK (HA!!)
                               ^^^^
 
Frank Sereno
Kansas State University
Manhattan, Kansas

....and YES...Garth Brooks and Billy Ray Cyrus suck as well!