HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gak@wrs.com (Richard Stueven)
Subject: Re: Renegotiation
Reply-To: gak@wrs.com
Organization: Wind River Systems, Inc.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 16:24:28 GMT

>People keep saying "we never would have won the Cup without _______."

...Washington, New York, Boston, and Chicago rolling over and playing dead.

---
gak
107/H/3&4
From: golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: TEAMS TO WATCH
Date: 25 Jul 92 22:08:06 GMT
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department

In article <1992Jul25.154925.1700@ccu.umanitoba.ca> umturne4@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Daryl Turner) writes:
>
>>
>>The Oilers actually only ended up with three players...they
>>tried protecting Bengt Gustafsson in addition to Gretzky, but
>>Gustafsson was later ruled not eligible for protection by the
>>Oilers.
>>
>I don't recall this, why was Gustafsson ruled ineligible?  (This ought
>to be good...considering Gretzky should have been ineligible as well,
>since no other team had had the other chance to draft him.)
>

He had been a Washington Capital draft choice, and had only joined
the Oilers in March of the last WHA season...I don't remember exactly
the reasons, but the Capitals lodged a complaint about the Oilers
protecting Gustafsson, and the powers-that-be, probably an arbitrator
eventually awarded him to the Capitals.  Gustafsson only played in
the playoffs for the Oilers in that last WHA season...the dispute
probably turned on the date Gustafsson signed a contract with the
Oilers, and whether players signed by that date were eligible for
protection.

Gerald
From: dwright@metz.une.edu.au (Denis Wright)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Re: New penalty corner rule
Date: 29 Jul 92 23:58:19 GMT
Organization: University of New England, Armidale, Australia

Steven Christensen writes:

>I am quite concerned that this rule will make penalty corners even
>more dangerous than they currently are.  Since the obvious attacking
>strategy is to trap the ball just outside the circle, and bunt or
>push it inside the circle for some powerful brute to 'fly-hit' at goal.
>My concern is that this strategy will lead to more lifted and less
>controlled shots at goal.

I see your point.  However, I'm not so sure that the "obvious
attacking strategy" is the one teams will go for so
consistently as they do under the present rules.  In the match
you played, the teams simply tried to get around the new rule
instead of thinking a bit creatively.

I suspect there will be a tendency to try a variety of other
(more subtle) manoeuvres in order to score.  I refer especially to
women's hockey, which doesn't rely so much on brute force as
men's does.

Denis Wright.

(Coach, YCW-Jets Women's Hockey Club)
...on their way to another premiership in 1992!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
From: faheem2@vccnorthe.its.rpi.edu (Muhammad Faheem)
Subject: Re: Major setback for India's chances
Reply-To: faheem2@rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:44:38 GMT

In article <5a3101133.001938f@fly.engin.umich.edu>, sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan) writes:
|> I'd have thought that India would have been hoping for at least a draw in the
|> game against Germany - given the fact that things had been going well during
|> the European tour. This must be seen as a major setback - one more loss and I'd
|> guess it's curtains. And that loss is very foreseeable - India's nemesis -
|> Australia (India have probably never beaten Australia since the Montreal
|> Olympics when Australia first made it big time). 
|>   Looking at the pools I'd bet on Australia, Germany, Netherlands and Pakistan
|> to make it to the semis. Potential spoilers - the Germany-Britain game and the
|> home team Spain.
|> 
|> Sudhama

	India never had any realistic chance against Germany. Now terming
this defeat as upset is rediculous.

   Faheem Akhtar
From: raza@surya.ccs.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Netherland beat team united 3-0
Date: 26 Jul 92 15:10:04 GMT
Organization: University of Western Ontario, London



subject says it all...

S.R.Raza.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field,soc.culture.indian
From: rachada@icaen.uiowa.edu (Ramakrishna Chada)
Subject: FIELD HOCKEY RESULT
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 11:02:17 GMT
Organization: Iowa Computer Aided Engineering Network, University of Iowa

Havent seen this article posted here. So I am cross posting it here.

Article 944 of rec.sport.olympics:
Newsgroups: rec.sport.olympics
From: rswiftrw@cc.curtin.edu.au (Rod Swift)
Subject: FLD HOCKEY: Result-Australia v Argentina
Organization: -=[ Curtin University ]=-  Perth, Australia.
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 09:02:47 GMT

>HOCKEY RESULT - Australia v Argentina
>=====================================

>In the first Field Hockey match in Barcelona, Australia had a convincing
>win over Argentina 7 to 0.

>Rod Swift

Ramakrishna
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
From: graeme@skylark.uwa.oz.au (Graeme Reid)
Subject: More Predictions ...
Reply-To: graeme@skylark.uwa.oz.au
Organization: Computer Science Department
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 09:44:13 GMT

Here are some more (definately biased) predictions for the Olympics

Gold	-	Australia
Silver	-	Germany
Bronze	-	Netherlands

Australia - well I have to back them gold :-) plus it's the first
olympics for as long as I can remember where they haven't been
favourites, which on past performance should guarentee them a medal.

Germany - Will finish top of their pool (just too strong), and look
invinsible until the upset in the final ...

Netherlands - the dark horse, picked mainly because no one else has
backed them for a medal and I know they're capable of it.  Besides,
if people can back India (Pargat) for a medal then why not the Netherlands
(Bouvelander) ?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Graeme Reid				Computer Science Department
email: graeme@cs.uwa.edu.au		The University of WA
Phone: +61 9 380 3456			Nedlands   WA   6009
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Hockey
Date: 29 Jul 92 15:23:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: vms.0095E4A0.9A8E3900
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services

Pakistan won its second match yesterday.
bye,

************************************************************
RAM            		       BULLS -93	

Politicians' statements tend to have a low specific gravity.
They carry less weight  than their volume would suggest.
		- Jonathan Miller
************************************************************
From: x90mumtaz@gw.wmich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Who are representing Pakistan in Olympics???
Date: 22 Jul 92 14:07:47 EST
Organization: Western Michigan University

Hi,
   I have heard that Pakistan has retained their BMW squad for the
Olympics. Does anybody know who represented Pakistan in BMW championship?

Atif Mumtaz

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field,soc.culture.indian
From: inde788@Jane.UH.EDU (Ashish Parikh)
Subject: Field Hockey : Day 1 Results
Reply-To: inde788@Jane.UH.EDU
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 23:37:15 GMT

Australia 7		Argentina 0
Spain	    3		NZ        0
Netherlands 5		Unified Team 2
Germany   3		India     0
Britain   2		Egypt     0
Pakistan  4		Malaysia  1



Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
From: hasnie@ecn.purdue.edu (Rizwan Hasnie)
Subject: POOL POSITION
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 01:16:09 GMT

 
Team positions on July 26, 1992.

                       POOL A
                                   Goals  Goals   
                       P  W  L  D   For  Against  Points                       
          Australia    1  1  0  0    7     0       2
          Germany      1  1  0  0    3     0       2
          Britain      1  1  0  0    2     0       2
          Egypt        1  0  1  0    0     2       0
          India        1  0  1  0    0     3       0
          Argentina    1  0  1  0    0     7       0



                       POOL B
                                   Goals  Goals
                       P  W  L  D   For  Against  Points
          Netherlands  1  1  0  0    5     2       2
          Pakistan     1  1  0  0    4     1       2
          Spain        1  1  0  0    3     0       2
          Unified Team 1  0  1  0    2     5       0
          Malaysia     1  0  1  0    1     4       0
          New Zealand  1  0  1  0    0     3       0

 
Rizwan

Xref: sparky rec.sport.hockey.field:418 rec.sport.olympics:2074 soc.culture.pakistan:12932
From: hasnie@ecn.purdue.edu (Rizwan Hasnie)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field,rec.sport.olympics,soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: HOCKEY'S POOL POSITION (MEN)
Date: 31 Jul 92 16:51:36 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network


 
Team positions on July 30, 1992.

                       POOL A
                                   Goals  Goals   
                       P  W  L  D   For  Against  Points                       
          Australia    3  2  0  1   13     2       5
          Germany      3  2  0  1    6     1       5
          Britain      3  2  1  0    5     3       4
          India        3  1  2  0    2     6       2
          Argentina    3  1  2  0    1     8       2
          Egypt        3  0  3  0    1     8       0


                       POOL B
                                   Goals  Goals
                       P  W  L  D   For  Against  Points
          Pakistan     3  3  0  0   11     3       6
          Netherlands  3  3  0  0   12     7       6
          Spain        3  2  1  0   10     5       4
          Unified Team 3  1  2  0   11    14       2
          New Zealand  3  0  3  0    3     8       0
          Malaysia     3  0  3  0    6    16       0
 
Rizwan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Pakistan beat New Zealand by one goal
From: A.Qadir@massey.ac.nz (A. Qadir)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 21:19:11 GMT
Organization: Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
X-Reader: NETNEWS/PC Version 2c

Hi!
Pakistan beat New Zealand by One goal.
1-0.
Altaf
From: gopal@tamsun.tamu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Re: Tuesday
Date: 28 Jul 92 16:44:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: tamsun.1992Jul28.164455.16327
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station

In article <1992Jul28.155415.11395@hubcap.clemson.edu> sbhatia@eng.clemson.edu writes:
>In article CE4203A0@vms.csd.mu.edu, 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu () writes:
>>hi there
>>
>>India beat Argentina 1-0
>*************************
>YAY....at least we won! Who scored the winner?
>Sameer
>

  The margin of victory is not much to cheer about and whether it is a field
goal or a penalty corner conversion is not known.

gopal
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
From: bholu@nyx.cs.du.edu (  Bholu)
Subject: India vs GB
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 92 11:10:22 GMT

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: India vs GB
Summary: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: world
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Keywords: 


The match began with both teams trying to settle into a rythm and
there was no serious challenge in the first 10 min by either
team.  Kerly then broke through from the left and earned a free 
hit just outside the Indian D when he was checked but the hit 
wasn't taken properly. Shortly after that GB earned its 1st PC 
when an ineffective clearnace from the Indian rt. back saw GB 
take possession on top of the D, followed by a swift pass into 
the D and then a foul by one of the Indian players. The PC was 
converted by Hill when he sent in a strong flick into the middle 
of the net.  India counter-attacked and earned a PC but it was 
saved  by the GB goalkeeper. India earned a 2nd PC following a 
move b/w Jagbir Singh and Shakeel Ahmed on the lt. flank but 
could not capitalize on it. Just before half-time India earned a 
third PC but a poorly executed attempt to flick the ball in saw 
another opportunity go down. Half-time 1-0 to GB.

The second half started at a fast pace and once again Murgesh 
Kumar and Felix combined well on the rt. for Murgesh to send in a 
beautiful cross from the Gb baseline but none of the 3 forwards 
could take advantage of it. Two substitutions; one each by India 
and GB. Free hit on the left side near the GB D was taken by 
Pargat and Pillay connected but the shot was saved. Another move 
from the rt. won a long corner for India. Pargat's strong hit 
into the GB D was deflected off a GB player's stick and Felix 
quickly picked up the free ball and with a strong push sent it 
across into the left corner of the goal. 1-1. Kerly then broke 
through taking advantage of a defensive lapse but his shot missed 
the left post by inches. GB then reversed the pressure. The rt 
winger managed to get past the Indian backs and pass it to Kerly 
who deflected it into the far side of the goal as the GK came out 
to meet the GB forward. 2-1 to GB. Another burst from the rt 
flank for GB and the ball was passed to Thompson who was left 
unmarked and he swiftly put the ball into the roof of the goal. 
3-1 to GB and 8-10 min of play left. The Indians then missed 
another PC, their 4th. A 5th PC was awarded to India but with 
only 1 1/2 min remaining India had lost the match. The 5th PC led 
to another PC and that to yet another one but the hooter sounded 
before it could be taken. Final score GB 3, India 1.
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Re: Predictions , not mine
Date: 24 Jul 92 15:19:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: vms.0095E0B2.4BFC1560
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services

In article <1992Jul24.005749.4449@cs.wayne.edu>, uds@siva.cs.wayne.edu (Seetamraju) writes:
>
>Why are everyone counting out the S.Koreans from the top-three posittion
>race ?  I havent heard them play many mathces in the recent past.  Have they ?

B'coz they have not qualified for the olympics.

bye,
From: rkv@acsu.buffalo.edu (Rajeev K. Verma)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Indian Team, Players Name???????????????????????????
Date: 23 Jul 92 21:26:34 GMT
Organization: University of Buffalo, New York, USA

Hi,

	Could some one send me, the names of the Players in
Indian Team.


				Good Day

			      Rajeev Verma


e-mail: rkv@acsu.buffalo.edu
From: sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Re: Major setback for India's chances
Date: 27 Jul 1992 13:57:44 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

In article <5a3101133.001938f@fly.engin.umich.edu>, sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sud
hama Gopalan) writes:
|> I'd have thought that India would have been hoping for at least a draw in the
|> game against Germany - given the fact that things had been going well during
|> the European tour. This must be seen as a major setback - one more loss and I
'd
|> guess it's curtains. And that loss is very foreseeable - India's nemesis -
|> Australia (India have probably never beaten Australia since the Montreal
|> Olympics when Australia first made it big time).
|>   Looking at the pools I'd bet on Australia, Germany, Netherlands and Pakista
n
|> to make it to the semis. Potential spoilers - the Germany-Britain game and th
e
|> home team Spain.
|>
|> Sudhama

        India never had any realistic chance against Germany. Now terming
this defeat as upset is rediculous.

   Faheem Akhtar
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  Nowhere have I used the word upset. If you can't understand the difference
between a setback and an upset, then you should probably not bother replying
to articles. If your objective is to convert this net to another 
sub-continental jungle then I suggest SCI - you'll find many of your kind there.

   On a slightly more objective note, in the last ten plus years India's best
performances (and results) against top (defined as Australia, Netherlands,
Germany, and Pakistan) teams have come against Germany - hence the hope of a
point in this game. I agree expecting a point in the game against Australia
can't sound too realistic - but not against Germany. Of course, India losing
to Great Britain, Argentina and Egypt would'nt surprise me one bit - they're
fully capable of it.

Sudhama
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
From: hasan@vxcrna.cern.ch 
Subject: Re: Mens Hockey July 30th results (complete)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 08:41:00 GMT

In article <92212.173417PAKEDITR@ASUACAD.BITNET>, Nauman Mysorewala. <PAKEDITR@ASUACAD.BITNET> writes...
>               Summer Olympics '92
>                 Mens Field Hockey
> 
>                  Point Table
> 
>Pool A          M  W  L  T  G AG Pts
> 
>Australia       3  2  0  1 12  1  5
>Germany         3  2  0  1  5  0  5
>Britian         3  2  1  0  5  3  4
>India           3  1  2  0  2  6  2
>Argentina       3  1  2  0  1  8  2
>Egypt           3  0  3  0  1  8  0
> 
> 
>Pool B          M  W  L  T  G AG Pts
> 
>Netherlands     3  3  0  0 12  3  6
>Pakistan        3  3  0  0 11  2  6
>Spain           3  2  1  0 10  5  4
>Unified         3  1  2  0 10  8  2
>New Zealand     3  0  3  0  3  6  0
>Malaysia        3  0  3  0  6 16  0
>

The above table seems to be the work of a poet.
The correct table (IMH tabulation :-)) should be:

Pool A          M  W  L  T  G AG Pts

Australia       3  2  0  1 13  2  5
Germany         3  2  0  1  6  1  5
Britian         3  2  1  0  5  3  4
India           3  1  2  0  2  6  2
Argentina       3  1  2  0  1  8  2
Egypt           3  0  3  0  1  8  0


Pool B          M  W  L  T  G AG Pts

Pakistan        3  3  0  0 11  3  6
Netherlands     3  3  0  0 11  6  6
Spain           3  2  1  0 10  4  4
Unified         3  1  2  0 11 14  2
New Zealand     3  0  3  0  2  7  0
Malaysia        3  0  3  0  6 16  0

	-Hasan

>Nauman K. Mysorewala
>Coordinator Pakistan News Service
>Owner Listserv, PAKISTAN@ASUACAD, MUSLIMS@ASUACAD
>Internet: PAKEDITR@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU
>Bitnet  : PAKEDITR@ASUACAD
From: sudhama@engin.umich.edu (Sudhama Gopalan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Re: Mhd. Shaihd's playing position
Date: 26 Jul 1992 09:36:11 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Shahid started off as an inside-left and that is what he played as for most of
his career. The Shahid-Zafar combination on the left flank worked pretty well.
After the LA games and the disqualification of Mervyn et al for a few years,
India fielded a new look team (Esanda, 1984/85) - Shahid was captain of this team.
He frequently switched to center-forward from this time on - there being no 
talent in that position. But it was at inside-left that Shahid left his mark.

Sudhama
From: n077gh@tamuts.tamu.edu (Sharma Anupindi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Mhd. Shaihd's playing position
Date: 26 Jul 1992 05:05:05 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station


Hai,

I had a debate with my roommate over the playing position of Mhd. Shahid (#10),
ex Indian Cap. As far as I can remember he was the centre forward.  Can some one
give information about this talented forward.


Thanx


Sharma
Xref: sparky rec.sport.hockey.field:354 rec.sport.olympics:1043
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field,rec.sport.olympics
Subject: HOCKEY:results
Date: 27 Jul 92 16:56:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: vms.0095E31B.5A8B79C0
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Followup-To: rec.sport.hockey.field
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services

First day
Pakistan b Malaysia 4-1
Netherlands b CIS 5-2
Germany b India 3-0
Spain b New Zealand 3-0
Australia b Argentina 7-0
Britain b Egypt 2-0

bye,

************************************************************
RAM            		       BULLS -93	

Politicians' statements tend to have a low specific gravity.
They carry less weight  than their volume would suggest.
		- Jonathan Miller
************************************************************
From: airdg@castle.ed.ac.uk (Richard Grey)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
Subject: Olympic Hockey Results Men : Days 1, 2 & 3
Date: 30 Jul 92 21:50:47 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

26th July
09.45	Australia vs Argentina		Pool A		Pitch 2	   7 - 0
10.15	Spain vs New Zealand		Pool B		Pitch 1	   3 - 0

16.00	India vs Germany		Pool A		Pitch 1	   0 - 3
17.30	Great Britain vs Egypt		Pool A		Pitch 2	   2 - 0 
18.00	Pakistan vs Malaysia		Pool B		Pitch 1	   4 - 1
20.00	Netherlands vs Unified Team	Pool B		Pitch 1	   5 - 2

28th July
09.45	India vs Argentina		Pool A		Pitch 2	   1 - 0
10.15	Unified Team vs Malaysia	Pool B		Pitch 1	   7 - 3

16.00	Australia vs Egypt		Pool A		Pitch 1	   5 - 1
17.30	New Zealand vs Pakistan		Pool B		Pitch 2	   0 - 1
18.00	Spain vs Netherlands		Pool B		Pitch 1	   2 - 3
20.00	Germany vs Great Britain	Pool A		Pitch 1	   2 - 0

30th July
09.45	Pakistan vs Unifed Team		Pool B		Pitch 2	   6 - 2
10.15	Great Britain vs India		Pool A		Pitch 1	   3 - 1

16.00	Argentina vs Egypt		Pool A		Pitch 1	   1 - 0
17.30	Netherlands vs New Zealand	Pool B		Pitch 2	   4 - 3
18.00	Germany vs Australia		Pool A		Pitch 1	   1 - 1
20.00	Malaysia vs Spain		Pool B 		Pitch 1	   2 - 5

Richard.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  	   	         airdg@uk.ac.ed.castle
          _______   __   ______   __   __   _______   _______   _______
         / ___  /  / /  / ____/  / /  / /  / ___  /  / ___  /  / ___  /
        / /__/_/  / /  / /      / /--/ /  / /__/ /  / /__/_/  / /  / /
       / /\ \    / /  / /___   / /--/ /  / /--/ /  / /\ \    / /__/ /
      /_/  \_\  /_/  /_____/  /_/  /_/  /_/  /_/  /_/  \ \  /______/

	{ Edinburgh University Dept. of Artificial Intelligence }
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
From: st1dh@judy.uh.edu (Arslan Siddiq)
Subject: Re: Scores ???
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 22:53:00 GMT

In article <0095E4BC.8148BC60@vms.csd.mu.edu>, 2674alis@vms.csd.mu.edu writes...
>Can someone post the result of Pakistan's 2nd match.
>Thanks in advance.

	Fakhar Lodhi had posted the result of Pakistan's 2nd match.
	But in case if you did not read it Pakistan won by 1-0

Arslan

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
From: yasin@laser.dev.cdx.mot.com (Yasin)
Subject: Re:     1992 Olympics - Men's Hockey Tournament
Organization: Motorola Codex, Canton, Massachusetts
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 16:02:41 GMT

In article <1992Jul29.221027.14966@hubcap.clemson.edu> kgonsal@eng.clemson.edu writes:
>Will you guys refrain from posting results in crappy format, p-a-l-e-a-s-e !!!
>
>If you want to refer to th standard format, pl see the previous posting of Rizwan Hasnie.
>
> 
>Sorry to say this...
>
>but it is an irritant
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Ken.


I disagree, I think it is a very nice format. Ken if you dont like it
then p-a-l-e-a-s-e dont read it. 

Thank you Fakhar Lodhi, for the nice presentation. And please do keep it
up.

Regards,

Yasin.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field
From: sbhatia@eng.clemson.edu (sameer bhatia)
Subject: Re: Tuesday
Reply-To: sbhatia@eng.clemson.edu
Organization: College of Engineering, Clemson Univ.
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 15:54:15 GMT

In article CE4203A0@vms.csd.mu.edu, 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu () writes:
>hi there
>
>India beat Argentina 1-0
*************************
YAY....at least we won! Who scored the winner?
Sameer





Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey.field