HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: unruh@physics.ubc.ca (William Unruh)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Focus moves with mouse?
Date: 26 Jan 1993 17:51:10 GMT
Organization: The University of British Columbia
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.ubc.ca
Keywords: mouse, focus, foreground, background

sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:

>Try getting the file xfeel.zip, available via anonymous ftp from
>ftp-os2.nmsu.edu (check file /pub/os2/00Index for location).  This
>utility will give you the focus follows mouse behavior.

Apparently it also has the foreground follows mouse behaviour ( ie, it
seems that in OS2 foreground and focus are tied together) If so tht
behaviour would be even more intollerable than at present-to have
windows popping to the forground all the time as my mouse happened to go
over them would make me seasick, and would make planning whee to  go
with the mouse difficult. 
Can OS2 seperate focus and foreground? That is what I would want!
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Ariel Design: OS/2 Bundled Computers
Date: 26 Jan 93 00:36:24 GMT
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange

In article <1993Jan23.014654.6584@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
> I notice that Ariel Design, an advertiser in Computer Shopper (Feb.
> 1993, p. 336) now advertises systems with OS/2 prebundled.  They can
> be reached at 800-842-7435 or 617-982-8800.

I just received the December CS (mine comes by boat....:-() and it was in
there, too. I am going through it page-by-page looking for OS/2
references.....
 
Why? Because the vast majority are not listed in the Index at the back. There
are several vendors who either say their systems are OS/2 compatible, or who
offer it as an alternaitve to MSDOS/WIN3.1......
 
Steve
-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand |      
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         |        Space for rent.
+64 4 478 4714                          |   - cheap rates, nice location. 
**** Happy user of OS/2 b2.1 ****       |
From: sstrazdu@vulcan.intel.com (Stephen Strazdus)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Focus moves with mouse?
Date: 27 Jan 1993 23:56:40 GMT
Organization: Intel Corporation
NNTP-Posting-Host: vulcan.intel.com
Keywords: mouse, focus, foreground, background

In article <1993Jan25.222717.20871@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <unruh.727982140@unixg.ubc.ca> unruh@unixg.ubc.ca (Bill Unruh) writes:
>>Is it possible to set OS2 up so that the focus moves with the mouse, rather
>>than the focus transfereing with a mouse click on the window (I know in
>>X it is an option). Also tht foreground background is not tied to the focus
>>ie to transfer to foreground you have to click  on the boarder ratehr than just 
>>anywhere. At present focus and foreground are tied together, and that is not 
>>always convenient.
>
>Try getting the file xfeel.zip, available via anonymous ftp from
>ftp-os2.nmsu.edu (check file /pub/os2/00Index for location).  This
>utility will give you the focus follows mouse behavior.

While xfeel does make the focus move with the mouse, it is not what many
people, including me, are asking for.  With xfeel, the focus moves with
the mouse *and* the window rises to the top of the stack.  What I would
prefer is a way to have the focus move with the mouse, but not rise to the
top.  This way you can type in a window which is partially obscured by another
window.

Why would you want to do that?  Well, because there is something in
another window that you would like to see while typing, and you don't
have a gigapixel display.  Or maybe your display is slow, and you really
don't wan't to watch the screen redraw everytime you move between
windows.

This seems to be one of those features that everyone thinks is useless
until they actually use it for a while, then they can't stand being
without it.  Very analagous to all the "Who needs multitasking?"
arguments.

I think IBM should incorporate this feature.  If they don't, MS will
probably put it in NT and act like they invented it.

--
Steve Strazdus    sstrazdu@sedona.intel.com
80960 Design      (602) 554-3867
From: enk2@po.cwru.edu (Erik Kovach)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Trident 8900c supported... right??
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:11:08 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b62711.student.cwru.edu

In article <1993Jan21.143225.20281@midway.uchicago.edu> pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (Jeremy Mathers) writes:
>>SET RESTARTOBJECTS=STARTUPFOLDERSONLY
>
>That's not really a solution.  It is a work-around.
>
How so?  I see it as a preference that can be set in the CONFIG.SYS.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry)
Subject: Re: JUMBO 250, Feb. Beta Release Questions
Originator: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 00:12:31 GMT

ujacampbe@memstvx1.memst.edu (James A. Campbell) writes:
: 
: 2) I've seen posts that indicate a new 2.1 beta will be released in
:    February.  Would I be well advised to wait until then and install
:    the new beta, or could I install the current release and just
:    install patches for the February release?
: 
Beta distributions are not for "Production Version" use - they are for people
who have the time and inclination to thrash the program (olr in this case OS)
around, locate and report bugs.

So many people on this group are winging about the supposedly "poor perfomance
/stability" of this release.

Now, if you want to spend some time playing, and risk not having a stable system
then go ahead - install the beta. If you want stable code, then you would be
very well advised to stear clear of betas, and wait for the GA.

Personally I enjoy beating OS's about, and so far I've been impressed by the 
2.1b release, despite it's little quirks.

-- 
Tom J Parry.
Your reality is a figment of my imagination.
From: frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca (Steve Frampton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Should OS/2 be _MY_ OS Too?
Date: 26 Jan 93 16:35:06 GMT
Reply-To: frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.misc
Organization: Vicuna Systems, Kingston, Ontario, CANADA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

azzarito@cse.fau.edu (Doug Azzarito) writes:

> Running more than one program at a time is EASY under OS/2.  Right now, 
> I'm online to a *IX system at 9600bps, and I'm downloading from another 
> BBS at 14.4Kbps.  At the same time I'm installing an OS/2 program, running 
> a windows program, and unzipping files at the command line.  It keeps you
> busy, but you'll never have to wait for your software again - if something
> is going to take some time, crack open another program and do something 
> else until the first program is finished.

Nothin' beats playing Mahjongg while an on-line user is reading USENET
news, Borland 3.0 is compiling a program, and waiting for OS/2 to
migrate some new apps.  :-)

Under Desqview and Windows 3.0, I had to actually hold my breath in
anticipation while starting an app -- if you weren't extremely careful,
and loaded the wrong (ie. "dangerous" app such as Borland C++ 3.0) ...
CRASH!

+--------+< Unabashed Shabba Ranks Fan! >+------+--------------------+
| Steve Frampton - frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca | Steve Frampton     |
| I collect postcards!  If you send me one from | 501-A Princess St. |
| your area, I'll send one in return.  Send to >| Kingston, Ontario  |
| (Don't forget both email and mailing address) | CANADA   K7L 1C3   |
+-----------------------------------------------+--------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rolfe@ldp.com (Rolfe Tessem)
Subject: Re: Trident 8900c supported... right??
Reply-To: rolfe@ldp.com
Organization: Lucky Duck Productions
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 13:57:15 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.143225.20281@midway.uchicago.edu>  
pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (Jeremy Mathers) writes:
> In article <enk2.70.727599970@po.cwru.edu> enk2@po.cwru.edu (Erik Kovach)  
writes:
> >In article <1993Jan20.171026.10773@midway.uchicago.edu>  
pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (Jeremy Mathers) writes:

> >>	2) I really think OS/2 ought to offer a way to choose at boot
> >>	   time whether or not it should reload all the apps that were
> >>	   running when you shut down (or crashed).
> >There is.  Add the following line to your CONFIG.SYS:
> >
> >SET RESTARTOBJECTS=STARTUPFOLDERSONLY
> 
> That's not really a solution.  It is a work-around.

Webster says:

so lu tion \se-'lu -shen\ n
[ME, fr. MF, fr. L solution-, solutio, fr. solutus, pp. of solvere to loosen,  
solve]
(14c)
1a: an action or process of solving a problem
b: an answer to a problem: EXPLANATION; specif: a set of values of the  
variables that satisfies an equation
2a: an act or the process by which a solid, liquid, or gaseous substance is  
homogeneously mixed with a liquid or sometimes a gas or solid
b: a homogeneous mixture formed by this process; esp: a single-phase liquid  
system
c: the condition of being dissolved
3: a bringing or coming to an end or into a state of discontinuity 


-- 
Rolfe Tessem				Lucky Duck Productions
rolfe@ldp.com				New York City
(212) 463-0029				(212) 463-7049 fax
From: pgleason@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Pat Gleason)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: MMPM/2 and SB
Date: 20 Jan 93 23:06:14 GMT
Organization: NCR Engineering and Manufacturing Atlanta -- Atlanta, GA

In <1993Jan20.095750.25675@unlv.edu> slumos@unlv.edu (Steve Lumos) writes:

>out is that when they said that I needed the 2.0 DSP to get *full*
>functionality, I assume that they mean that without the 2.0 DSP I can
>get *some* functionality (which I can't).

I am glad to see someone else read that paragraph the same way I did.
From: h198@hosp.med.umich.edu  (Gene Mangum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: SBMMPM/2
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993  11:05 EDT
Organization: Univ of Michigan Hospitals
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: condor.hosp.med.umich.edu
X-Newsreader: FTPNuz (DOS) v1.0

In Article <1993Jan26.220926.10314@doug.cae.wisc.edu> "calica@cae.wisc.edu (Carlo James Calica)" says:
> Help!  I can't get my SoundBlaster to work with OS2.  Works great under DOS but
> not OS/2.  First off I can't get the dos drivers to work.  Won't even install.
> Also the test program won't work.  Says I have a DMA channel 1 conflict.  All
> I have in my system is the SB, SVGA card, modem, IDE/IO card.  No obvious
> conflicts there either.  It also won't work undem MMPM/2.  I'm getting to the
> point of selling the SoundBlaster.  I bought it because I thought it was
> compatible!  Thanks for any help granted.
 
  [Stuff Deleted] 
 
  Do you know what DMA channel your disk controller uses?   I ended up
  getting mine working by changing DMA (remember to change DRQ as well)
  although I'm sure my HD was different, and I had no obvious conflicts.
 
  Also, many people have had trouble getting it to work under OS/2 with
  IRQ 10 (and some including me couldn't use IRQ 2 - I swapped the SB
  with the bus mouse on IRQ 5).   I'd suggest trying to use IRQ 5 if
  at all possible.   Changing the DMA is pretty painless...

+=================================+=========================================+  
| Gene Mangum                     |  OS/2 ver 2 - Increased productivity    |
| Univ of Michigan Hospitals      |               through the use of a      |
| h198@hosp.med.umich.edu         |               "dead" operating system.  |
+=================================+=========================================+
From: mortenk@dhhalden.no (MORTEN KNUDSEN)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Speed in 2.1b
Date: 22 Jan 93 10:50:02 GMT
Organization: Ostfold College

In article <1993Jan20.143806.1323@yvax.byu.edu> hayesb@yvax.byu.edu writes:
>
>On the contrary, though I've only been using the beta for a couple of days, I
>have actually seen some speed increases.  My WIN-OS/2 sessions come up faster,
>and the WPS seems a bit snappier.  Overall, the entire system seems more stable
>in the beta version on my particular machine.  On the other hand, over a matter
>of time the system does seem to slow down considerably.  I haven't the
>slightest idea why that happens.
>
>Bryan

More stable? 
I tried running a dos program windowed yesterday, and after WPS hung 
for the second time, I gave up and ran 2.0 instead. 
Also, on my first attempt of installing 2.1b, I got the message that 
the installation program had crashed and was left with a empty task-list. 
I think it was at the point when I was after finishing disk 7. 
The system hasn't stopped yet, though.
From: ujacampbe@memstvx1.memst.edu (James A. Campbell)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: JUMBO 250, Feb. Beta Release Questions
Date: 25 Jan 93 10:04:30 -0600
Organization: MSU Comp Sci Dept

I'm new to the OS/2 newsgroups (and to OS/2), and I see that I can 
FTP the beta release of 2.1 now.  I'd love to do this, but I have a 
couple of questions before I attempt such a thing:

1) I'm running a 486/33 ISA, AMI BIOS, 8MB 60ns RAM, WD 2200 212MB,
   with a JUMBO 250 tape drive piggybacked on my floppy controller.
   If I install 2.1 beta, could I still use my JUMBO without buying
   new software?  Would it require using FAT instead of HPFS?

2) I've seen posts that indicate a new 2.1 beta will be released in
   February.  Would I be well advised to wait until then and install
   the new beta, or could I install the current release and just
   install patches for the February release?

Thanks in advance -- James

  ===========================================================================
  James Campbell, Math Sciences Department, MSU; ujacampbe@memstvx1.memst.edu
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: merrill@optima.UUCP (Darren Merrill)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Texel CD-ROM support
Date: 23 Jan 93 03:16:05 GMT

From article <1jq8rt$8ic@agate.berkeley.edu>, by drkszk@ocf.berkeley.edu (Derek Suzuki):
> 
> 	I know these are supported under OS/2.  However, I'd like to be
> sure this includes the new double speed drive.  Is CD Audio supported?
> 
They are supported right out the 'box' in 2.1.  I am currently
running 2.1b with a Future Domain 1670 and Texel 3024 (listening to
a CD).  So.. 'yes.'

-darren
--
Darren Merrill                  Internet: merrill@cs.arizona.edu  
Department of Computer Science  Compuserve: 76570,2526
University of Arizona    
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: scdrye@zeno13.math.UWaterloo.ca (Stephen Drye)
Subject: The Beta and Windows REAL mode? (Logitech ScanMan)
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 23:51:52 GMT

Hi there!

When I installed the generic "Trident" drivers on my ATI VGAWonder system,
I discovered that Windows real mode programs would no longer run. 
(the real mode app is the scanning program from the ScanMan Plus.  I
really have no urge to spend $75 to upgrade to FotoTouch).

When I re-installed my normal ATI full-screen Windows driver, the program 
would run again.

So, I was wondering if the 2.1 beta still supports real mode Windows, or if
Logitech is going to get a real upgrade program anytime soon.

Also, if the beta seems to not support real mode windows, is it only the
drivers that are the culprits?  Somebody mentioned that they are Panacea's
WinSpeed drivers, which disallow Windows real mode, even under DOS/Windows.

Stephen Drye
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm waiting for Rod Serling to start narrating my life...

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (Jeremy Mathers)
Subject: Re: Trident 8900c supported... right??
Reply-To: pynq@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: D. J. Dougherty & Associates
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:32:25 GMT

In article <enk2.70.727599970@po.cwru.edu> enk2@po.cwru.edu (Erik Kovach) writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.171026.10773@midway.uchicago.edu> pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (Jeremy Mathers) writes:
>>	1) After installing 1024x768x256, I ran the Program Manager.
>>	   When I exited it, the machine locked up solid.  (I.e., I now
...
>This is a problem with me and one, if not several, other users, and I don't 
>think that it is related to the drivers.  A representative from IBM who 

The problem did go away when I re-installed, without running DSPINSTL.

>>	2) I really think OS/2 ought to offer a way to choose at boot
>>	   time whether or not it should reload all the apps that were
>>	   running when you shut down (or crashed).
>There is.  Add the following line to your CONFIG.SYS:
>
>SET RESTARTOBJECTS=STARTUPFOLDERSONLY

That's not really a solution.  It is a work-around.

************************************************************************
The Zapruder film was a snuff film.

	- pynq@quads.uchicago.edu, who is still costing the net
	  hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars, every time he posts -
************************************************************************
From: ted@isgtec.com (Ted Richards)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Changing the color of icon text
Date: 22 Jan 93 13:26:37 GMT
Organization: ISG Technologies Inc. Mississauga Ont. Canada
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]

Pat Berry (pat@berry.Cary.NC.US) wrote:
: gt1610c@prism.gatech.EDU (Michael Kenneth McGaugh) writes:

: > In article <gZJeXB3w165w@berry.Cary.NC.US> pat@berry.Cary.NC.US (Pat Berry) w
: > >cvetp036@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu writes:
: > >> Isn't there a shadow icon text selection in the Scheme Palette?
: > >
: > >Yes.  I meant to say that I select Shadow Text, pick the color I want,
: > >drag the scheme icon to the desktop, and nothing happens.  In other
: > >words, Shadow Text doesn't appear to work.
: > 
: > For some reason which I have not yet figured out, you must hold
: > down the ALT key when you drag the scheme to your desktop in order
: > for the shadow text color to be changed.

: That will change the shadow text color in EVERY FOLDER on my entire
: system!  I don't want to do that.  I just want to change the shadow text
: color on my WPS desktop.

It's a bug which I (and probably countless others) reported in mid-April '92.
It still hasn't been fixed as of the service pack.  Anybody tried it in
the beta?

Drag doesn't work, ALT-drag does (and yes, it does change them all).
Sorry.

--
Ted Richards            ted@isgtec.com             [...!uunet.ca!isgtec!ted]
ISG Technologies Inc.   6509 Airport Rd., Mississauga  Ont.  Canada   L4V 1S7
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: johnson@spectra.com (boyd johnson)
Subject: Re: Dvorak key layout and SWAPDCP
Organization: Spectragraphics Corporation
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 23:14:21 GMT

In article <1jg09dINN4n1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> mahler@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Gustav Mahler) writes:
>
>Does anyone know how to make  
>Swapdcp work globally or of another way to remap the keyboard or where
>to find an actual Dvorak keyboard? (besides the Keytronic one)  Any help

Several months ago I bought an older model of a Northgate Omnikey
keyboard that has (among many other features) a QWERTY/DVORAK switch.
It was about $60.  Of course, the keyboard comes with keycaps labeled
for QWERTY, but you can switch keycaps.
The keyboard also has a great feel, swappable Caps Lock & Control keys,
variable autorepeat rate (that seems to conflict with BIOS autorepeat).

-- 
======== Boyd Johnson    nosc!spectra.com!johnson  San Diego, Ca. ========
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jsanchez@halcyon.com (Jim Sanchez)
Subject: TE/2 Will not exit with PAS drivers
Organization: The 23:00 News and Mail Service +1 206 382 MAIL (382-6245)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 15:02:53 GMT

Since I installed the beta PAS-16 drivers, I notice that te2 will not
exit properly.  When I press Alt-X, it just sits there until I do a
alt-esc and get back to the desktop.  If I try and kill the process, the
minimized icon stays there until I reboot.  Anyone else had this happen?
Thanks
-- 
Jim Sanchez
jsanchez@halcyon.com (206)836-0105
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: djg2@crux3.cit.cornell.edu (David J. Greenberger)
Subject: Re: Is OS/2 a dead end?
Keywords: So quoth Bill Gates
Organization: Cornell Information Technologies
Date: 22 Jan 93 15:14:27 GMT

tcscs!zeta@src.honeywell.com (Gregory Youngblood) writes:

>or so.  With OS/2, when it reboots, particularly after a crash or unexpected
>shutdown, it takes upwards of 5 to 30 minutes depending on your hard drive
>size and configuration.  One time of that happening and your average computer
>user is going to be disoriented.

Upwards of 5 to 30 minutes?!  How much RAM do you have?  I have 16 MB on a
486/33, and it *never* takes more than one or two minutes for OS/2 to boot up.
--
|      David J. Greenberger      |   BBS: (212) 496-8324          |
|      106 West Avenue           |   Internet: djg2@cornell.edu   |
|      Ithaca, NY 14850          |   RIME: Common, ->48           |
|      (607) 272-2137            |                                |
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: adhir@wam.umd.edu (Al Dhir)
Subject: Re: MMPM/2 and PC speaker
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:11:52 GMT


>  I installed the speaker driver under Win-OS2 3.1 (which I installed on
>  a Service-Pack'd system) and it did play, albeit pitifully.   I ended
>  up removing it.   The sound was very scratchy, I think because when OS/2
>  dispatched another task, the speaker went off.   And sometimes it would
>  take a long time to play the "ta-da".
 
Actually, it works pretty good as long as you give Windows the HW_TIMER (by
turning it on in DOS SETTINGS.
-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Al Dhir                      			   Technical Consulting Staff
 Internet: adhir@cygnus.umd.edu	  	 University of Maryland, College Park
 Bitnet:   adhir%cygnus.umd.edu@Interbit      (301) 405-1500 * (301) 405-3014
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Subject: Re: converting GIF ---===> BMP
Reply-To: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Organization: Columbia University, New York
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:13:12 GMT

Actually, PMFractl seems to be very adept at this!

In article <C1Ev52.Fn1@panix.com> os2man@panix.com (Larry Salomon Jr.) writes:
>In <C1E44w.2q4@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (kellmeyer steven l) writes:
>
>>nsorathi@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Nilesh Sorathia) writes:
>
>>>Is there a program out that will convert 1024x768x256 GIF to
>>>1024x768x256 BMP?  I have a program called GWS that's suppose to convert
>>>the files, but everytime I try converting it gives me an error saying
>>>something like "file can't be converted".  I tried all the GIFs I have
>>>and none of them worked.
>>>What I'm trying to do is make a BMP for the background of OS/2.
>>>Does anyone have any suggestions?
>>>If so, my E-Mail address is "Nsorathia@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu"
>
>>Ditto.  Where does one pick up a program that does such a conversion? 
>
>Get the Image Toolkit and Image Browser from the CD-ROM.  The Image Toolkit
>can load GIFs (plus BMPS, etc.) and can save in BMP format.  Load the image
>into IBROW and save as a BMP with the attributes you like.
>
>Cheers,
>Q
>-- 
>"If you choose not to decide, you  | "My other body is in the shop" - seen
> still have made a choice" - Rush  |  on a T-shirt
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-- Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  --


 * * * * *  =================== Internet   mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
* * * * * * == Meir I. Green == AmateurPkt N2JPG@W2XO.PA.USA.NOAM
 * * * * *  = mig@columbia.edu= Amateur IP N2JPG@uhm.ampr.org
* * * * * * =================== BC-Goliath green@smtplink.barnard.columbia.edu 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc