HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Disclaimer: IT WAS NOT ME!
Date: 23 Jan 93 12:15:20 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

HEY, MORON! I can be proud that somebody wanna *try* imitate me, 
but just try to fuckyourself alone, ok?

In article <1993Jan22.204055.29370@fuug.fi>, an6882@anon.penet.fi writes:
>>tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:
>>>Michele does not exist.
>>>
>>I KNEW IT!!  What did I say to you, gusset-cheese?  I said that you were
> What did you knew?  nothing may be?

WHAAAAATTTTA?!?!? WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU, NOW?!? Tony? Anyway, 
whatever you are, your game sicks, ok?
> 
> I told you Tony was help me when some *asshole* got me kick off at faglab. 
> Thats all.

I don't write in your stupid way, MORON. I could write the 
same think in this way:
"I told you that Tony was helping me because an asshole 
kicked me off the faglab". You see? It is different.
Learn the italian before to post this bullshit.
> 
> Hu ho.  You were FOOL, moron!  You just dont no, do you?

I neither know what fool means...
> 
> I am smart.  Do I have to explain you how much a loser you are like I did 
> before.  Sorry, I am busy.

Pfui. 
> 
> I'm Italian an proud of it.  If you swedish (or whatthefuckyoucallit) cant 
> take the heat, GO AWAY!

I have never said that I am proud to be Italian. I said that 
I am proud to be a Latin Lover. 
> 
> Yes you finally realize it.  Not like swedish (or whatthefuckyoucallit) 
> peoples like you an jorn, LOSERS!

I don't write such a lame.
> 
> I am sorry for you moron.  You are moron and dont no it.  I have no time 
> for explain this to you now but may be this help you petit frou-frou:

Fuck you, Tony! You want the war, now! Just wait.

[megafuck .sig deleted/. It is not my style]

> the REAL Michele

No way. You are just a loser.
> 
> PS - oh, yeah, get uh LIFE, losers!

I do not use to write such a lame. Only ones in a while, for 
people that need it. 
> 
Anyway, nice game, idiot. If you study me a lot more you can 
become a perfect flamer. But you need to exercize. And try 
do do it with *your* name!

	Michele

    (yes, the only one)

P.S.	Tony, fuck yourself. 
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: user@computer.uio.no (PC Jorgensen)
Subject: Re: truth about scandinavian men
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: UiO
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:43:14 GMT

In article <1993Jan18.204832.15528@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>,
rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) wrote:
> 
> i really wanted to tear into this norwegian feeb with all i got, but, but
> its just too pathetic. he makes jorn look like a nobel laureat. shit,
> im laughing too hard with knowing pity to abuse this poor lutefisk victim,
> ill leave it to twitty or someone like that.


Comment: sod off.

I tried to give the impression that not all Norwegians are cavemen like
Jorn. But I didn't reckon on the absoluteness of cavemanism among you
lot.

Go to hell, arsehole!

PC
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Disclaimer: IT WAS NOT ME!
Date: 25 Jan 93 18:19:04 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <16060145@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com>, tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:
> Hey!  What is this shit!
> 
> I am Michele.. I was the one who made Michele up. Who are YOU asshole!
> I thought up Michele Dallagata... He was a friend of mine long ago.

I am going to become schizofrenic, now.

TONYYYYY!@#!$!#@! What the fuck are you doing?!?  How can 
you be me, if I was a friend of yours, and also if you are 
an invention of mine? What the hell is happening here?!?

	Michele

Disclaimer: Tony wrote this lame.
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Beer, me Mason!
Date: 26 Jan 1993 17:37:39 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
Distribution: alt
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <katherim.727991648@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
|maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
|
|>In article <katherim.727733449@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
|>|maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
|>|>Kathy writes
|>|>|[My comments deleted because Graley couldn't respond to them]
|Just returning the favour, Graley.
|>|>
|>|>Youre still bitter about that, aren't you?
|>|
|>|[pathetic flame about an apostrophe deleted]
|
|>You just love those lame flames, don'cha.
|
|>First its vocab flames, then grammar flames, now _apostrophe_ flames. Can you
|>really think of nothing better to flame me about than the fact that I decided
|>to omit a single apostrophe? 
|
|As you so coyly deleted above - *_you_* started this stupid spelling-flame
|war.  I am merely continuing.  

Incorrect. It was someone entirely different. Get your facts right, and you 
might get taken seriously.

|>Youre really desperate, arent you?
|
|You are the one who is desperate.  After starting a spelling-flame war,
|you resort to spelling-flame-flames.  Now that's what I call desperate.

See above. Your argument is entirely null at the moment. It is a waste of
bandwidth, because it is based soley on your incorrect assertions. You are
a waste of space, because you are a sad individual, with no life.

|>|
|>|>heh.
|>|
|>|You really are into this one line flame thing. Perhaps you could use some
|>|assistance.  The next lesson you need is "how to put two sentences together".
|
|>I am not 'really into' single line flames. I would point out, though, that
|>often even a single word is more effective than an apostrophe flame or similar.
|>Take note and learn well.
|
|One line flames are cowardly, Graley.  If you would read your posts you would
|see that you are quite "into" them.  They are cowardly because you flame the
|other person, but you are too chicken to leave any material for someone
|else to flame.  But then what should I expect from you.  Take note, Graley?
|I really don't want to learn to lame.  You could take notes from _anyone_
|on this group.  Even Michele has more to say than you do.

Actually, I do not need to read any of my previous articles, because I know.
This is because I an not schizophrenic(sp?) like you are.

It is highly amusing that you should have the audacity to try and blame the 
original poster for making a post which you cannot flame. Surely this 
frequent occurance can only mean one thing... You are a CRAP FLAMER and a
TOTAL LOSER.

Indeed, judging by your recent postings, I think it would be fair to say 
you have ALREADY LOST.

~THE GREAT NAME
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Date: 25 Jan 1993 17:02:08 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <katherim.727732417@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
|maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
|
|>In article <katherim.727666304@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
|>|There IS a difference, trust me.  Watch who you are flaming, or you may
|>|find the combined wrath of all Welsh, Scottish and Irish upon your head.
|
|>Yeh, you canadians would know wouln't you?
|
|Yes, we would.  Why do you think our ancestors came here?  To get as far as
|possible away from idiocy you call a country and the french, german and
|Italian mishmash you call a culture.

Read and learn, bitch...

One of us lives in Britain, the other does NOT. Curiously, it is the one who
does NOT live in britain, who thinks she knows all about it. Like bollocks
do you.

This is really a very boring thread. Is trying to drag the Welsh, Scottish
and Irish into it the best you can manage? And you sure post a lot of flames
for a crapster. This is the fourth in a row you have posted at me... You 
seem to be trying to get my attention. If you wish to flame with the master, 
(THE GREAT NAME), you will have to improve your quality, as the crap you post
currently is just a waste of bandwidth.

|
|>Silly bitch.
|
|Such flaming finesse.  Such mastery of the tongue.  Such noble language.
|(Sneer)  Such garbage.

But you _are_ a silly bitch! This isn't alt.blind.em.with.flattery you know.
If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

|One line flames are your thing aren't they Graley?  You might at least
|learn to do them well.

One line flames are not 'my thing'. I select my flames from a wide range of
styles, using whatever is required for the given situation. You can see this
by actually reading some of my previous flames to you and others (something
you never normally do)

~THE GREAT NAME
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: why?
Date: 26 Jan 93 11:33:26 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <C1G5DI.Dqq@world.std.com>, martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan) writes:
>>dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>>>
>>>How you losers can kick my ass painfully, it is something that I 
>>>can't understand, there are no way. So, you didn't.
> 
> I kicked you ass (or like I said "spanked you ass") OFF the net for two weeks.
> You sat at FagLab and wallowed in shit.
> 
And maybe you think to be funny. You are a moron. 

When do you get a clue?

	Michele

PS	I suggest you: there is moron called jason that is 
	boring, even more boring than you. Why don't you go 
	to meet him? You can be a perfect couple.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Vinnie (formerly Phantom) the Fascist
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:30:54 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.181550.18563@research.nj.nec.com>, haushalt@research.nj.nec.com (Robert C.Haushalter) writes:

> Those two fuckwits reagan and bush were in office for _TWELVE_ years 
> and you're still blaming lyndon johnson's great society?  Nice logic.  That 
> fucking lyndon johnson ran up our $4 trillion dollar debt right?

No, I never stated that in my post, I merely said that liberalism has been
failing *since* the Great Society. I suppose I could have started with FDR, but
that would be unrealisic, even for a clueless fuck like yourself. You whine
about the debt, but you would rather keep all the inefficientcies of government
programs. Logic, eh? Reread what I said, but try not to move your lips so much
next time.
 
> I guess you prefer the "borrow and spend" policies of the last two losers 
> reagan and bush?  And please don't come up with that infantile arguement 
> that "congress approves all spoending" crap that you fascists are so fond of.  

Your obvious ineptitude of government is obscene. Presidents don't merely just
sign you stupid ass. Legislation is often laiden with other comprimises that a
president must sign in order to keep the government moving. To simply blame
*just* the president is total, and complete ignorance.

>[Blather about tax-loop holes that Clinton has vowed to do away with deleted]

> It costs the government a lot more than welfare.  I know why.  You like 
> your governement subsidy, right.? . . it's just the poor guy that shouldn't get 
> one, you fucking hypocrite.  How about government backed student loans?  
> In fact, I bet your stinking right wing ass right now is being supported on 
> some sort of government scholarship, loan or subsidy.

No, its the poor guy that would rather stay on welfare than get up and help
himself out. I fully believe in helping the poor, its just that the current
welfare system isn't working. I think that even you could see that. Try reading
Jack Kemp's proposals on this very subject, it's far too detailed for me to try
and scale it down to someone with as little economic understanding that you
have. True, I am receiving about $16,000 to come to school here, all in
scholarships. I don't think that paying someone to get a college education is
evil at all, nor do I espouce that theory. Just because you were too much of a
glue sniffing, greasy scab in high school and couldn't GET a full ride, besides
whatever your mother could do, don't try to bring it down on me, ok? BTW, how
much do you leech off of society in your little "research" hmm? How much is the
government paying you to read alt.flame? You're sick. Fuck you and die.

> You can suck the snotty end of my liberal fuck-stick Vinnie. 

Uh... no thanks. You are looking for a guy named Martin Hannigan. I'm sure he
would be delighted about the offer. Snotty, huh? Well I guess when you were
trying the 'ol "I'll try it myself" you just couldn't make it to your mouth.
Well, from what I can tell, you probably enjoyed your little... nose fuck. 

--The Phantom
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: why?
Date: 25 Jan 93 15:50:08 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <35840@olympus.wustl.edu>, moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>>
>>[...] There were *no* answers (I am 
>>the only one 
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^---> sic!!!
>>that knows my ass, so I am the only one that can judge it)
> 
> The subsequent flame is *sooo* straightforward and trivial. I leave it to the
> more colorful interpretation of JS or Rob (no offense intended with this
> name association, Robby dear)...
> 
I know that the dawg of Rob knows your ass as you do, that 
means that you both put everything inside it, but the fact 
that *you* do it, doesn't imply that I do the same.

I am the only one that knows my ass, but I don't know it as 
well as you know your one....

He, he, he, he... Flame this now...

> Moana.

	Michele

PPPPPS	Obviously many pretty girls know my cock very well....

PPPPPPS	Don't cocktease Rob. He's going to marry the dawg of 
	Liz, don't destroy a new family.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:45:16 GMT

Kevin Walsh <kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk> writes:

>In article <katherim.727666304@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>> There IS a difference, trust me.  Watch who you are flaming, or you may
>> find the combined wrath of all Welsh, Scottish and Irish upon your head.
>> 
>Who?

>Pah!

Perhaps if you lifted your ignorant head from your own front yard long
enough you would know.  You're worse than the Americans.  At least 10% 
of Americans can point to the United States on a map of the United 
States.

Katherine Merle Mason
Ne Oublie....
>-- 
>   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
>  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     Professor Kevin Walsh
> _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
>_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a la 400ci)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Re: Is that REALLY Michele? - NO!
Date: 20 Jan 93 21:37:49 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <16060135@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com> tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:

>Michele does not exist.Michele does not exist.

You do not exist.  You do not exist.  You do not exist.  

To end the illusion of your own existance, pull the plug on your terminal 
while reading this post.
 -----------Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS--------
 ObQuotes:
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
 "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

    Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: blow me
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 16:20:42 GMT

> tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:

>
>This isn't a library....either buy the book, or I'll blow your head off!
>								   -Apu

K00l! you mean YOU watch the SIMPSONS too? Im so glad that you livened
up this group with a quote from a tv show that only about 15,000,000
people watch! you are so fuckin funny, and original too!
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Andy, limericks, the Brady Bunch, and cannibalism
Date: 22 Jan 93 06:00:02 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1993Jan21.231455.25403@news.nd.edu>, mel@maddog.ece.nd.edu (Melvin Gladstone) writes:
> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>>vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>>>
>>>[babble]
>>
>>Well, look what the cat has dragged in!
>>Our little non-corporeal friend!
>>We thought he departed,
>>But now he has farted,
>>And manifested himself once again!
> 
> Andy, you cheap slut.  You'll write a limerick for
> anyone.  Well how about a theme a song:
> 
> Here's the story, of a man named Andy,
> Who was busy with three boys of his own,
> He kept them, chained in his basement,
> So he was not alone.
> 
> Then one day this Andy met a policeman,
> An officer who acted on a hunch,
> He searched, through Andy's basement,
> And that's how Andy got his gruesome lunch!
> 
> His gruesome lunch! etc.
> 
>>-- Andy 
> 
> Melvin M. Gladstone

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! SO TRUE! ANDY. JEFFREY DAHMER. CONNECTION?

JEFF WITTY
ARMY R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY
From: moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Proud of drinking beer...
Date: 27 Jan 93 21:50:03 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Washington University,  St Louis MO

The cat (Michele) and the Fox (Jason) claim:
>>I can drink gallons of beer every evening. Trust me, I can 
>>put you below the table even with beer, I already did with 
>>you americans. Puah! Italians drink since we are born, we 
>>don't need to wait to be 21 years old...
>
>We have ways of getting around that silly little 21 thing...

This is the ultimate example of what I mean when I refer to the obnoxious
class of 'macho-spewers'...

Moana
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Shut the fuck up, Moaner.
Keywords: Love's Arrow
Date: 26 Jan 93 06:20:30 GMT
Organization: Cupid, Inc.

(Mr J S Graley) writes:

  [ more slander against my fair fiancee, Katherine deleted... ]



Hey you vapid, little, weasel with the reasoning ability of a used
wad of chewing gum, I've just about had it with your foul mouthed
abuse.

I know this is the most attention you've had from a real woman
in your entire life, but Katherine is TAKEN, you retched little priapatic
pustule.

You oughta be tied up buck nekkid and dragged through the sage brush for
talking to a lady that way, you rancid pre-pubescent little snot.

Katherine, I'm sorry you had to hear this.

-- Andy  
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 05:19:53 GMT

In article <1jktrdINNs2b@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@wpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>>Anybody with a whole brain (and this obviously does not include you)
>>knows that this newsgroup used to bristle with well-written, inter-
>>esting, funny, clever flames.  You and your school friends have turned 
>>it into a miasma of blinding stupidity.
>Oh really? 

Absolutely.  

>Get real!  If you hate alt.flame so much, if it is so stupid, then why

I don't hate alt.flame, dear, it's my favorite newsgroup and has been
since 1984.  

>>>newsgroup and the attitudes of the posters.  Alt.flame isn't here for
>>>discussion purposes, you ignorant slut, it's here for flaming anyone
>>Indeed it is, child.  
>Oh, it is?  Hmm...I never realized that a flame group was supposed to
>be a place where the bright people heatedly discussed important things
>like UNIX, abortion and world leaders.

Yes, but then you've a very stupid person so it's not surprising that
it would never occur to you that flaming could be something other than
the banal drooling in which you engage.

>>Any chance that you and your friends will act-
>>ually get around to flaming any time soon?  Or do you plan to contin-
>>ue the insipid, juvenile nonsense that has so far characterized vir-
>>tually everything you've ever posted?
>Yes, I can see your maturity level poking through right there.  It's the

Gee I guess not, huh.  But that's okay, Liz, I was just curious.  You
go right ahead and continue posting all the insipid juvenile nonsense 
your little heart desires.

>But then again, what should you care what I think...

I don't care what you think, child.  Obviously.  

>....  I'm racist, remember?

Indeed.

---------------
It's too bad you're too deeply insecure to ever see the merest
possibility that you are not now perfect, nor have you ever been (nor
will you ever be), and that you are not now, nor have you ever been
right.  You are made sufficiently incompetent by your subjectivity to 
your own woes and biases that everything you touch turns to shit.  You
are unwanted, and rightfully so.  You set yourself apart for derision 
by your own words (if not actions), and then have the gall to complain 
when you are attacked by others who try to live within the tight 
confines (to you) of reality.
				-- John Woods
				<1992Jan7.183556.7161@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: Mark B.
Subject: Re: A Day in the life of: Rob Dobson
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 15:34:22 GMT


In article <C1CoEz.G79@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>>> 
>>What? No rhyme? 
>
>
>
>You don't rate a limerick at this point in time, Private.
>How about a haiku instead?
>
>"Cruel Irony"
>
>Ah! What ironic twist of fate named you "Witty"?
>The lowest of all, the object of pity.
>
>-- Andy


You call that haiku, gaijin?!??

How about...

Last of its kind, wing-spread majesty
Lone bald eagle on lifeless branch
Twitty takes aim.

Mark B.
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Intellectuals & women
Date: 24 Jan 93 21:39:45 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1993Jan24.061211.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <1993Jan24.091306.12344@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan24.014919.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>
>Humiliate? MOI? Pfffff! You are humiliating yourself, idiot. 
>You are not able to deal with alt.flame. All of this started 
>because *YOU* told me that I hate women, for a macho style 
>drivel that I've put on the net. 

HAHAHAHA!!!  Believe me, you are humiliating yourself!  Look at you!  You
call your own posts drivel!  Do you know what drivel means?  You are such a
fool.  You try to deal with alt.flame!  It is you who are getting
reamed daily by the people in this group!
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: haushalt@research.nj.nec.com (Robert C.Haushalter)
Subject: Re: Beer, me Mason!
Originator: haushalt@shakti
Organization: NEC Research Institute
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 13:41:17 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.143538.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>In article <1k23hnINNo24@clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
>> You have accused me of a "copy-cat" flame, and then proceeded to use the 
>> phrase "You FUCKING FUCKED FUCK OF A FUCKING FUCK"
>> 
>> Fascinating.
>
>Once again you prove, by preponderence of the evidence, that you are by far the
>most cluless of ALL on the net. My posting is the very innuendo to which you
>refer. THANK-YOU moron, you prove on your own that you are completely lacking
>of a  slightest grasp of what innuendo or subtlety means. Graley, you are far
>too stupid to continue any sort of arguement. That is fascinating, isn't?
>
>--The Phantom
Fascinating? I wish I could say the same for your posts Vinnie.


-- 
The opinions are mine..not my company's.
Actually, everything is more complicated		

Newsgroups: alt.flame