From: trh@jack.sns.com (Al Trh)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.turkish
Subject: An article on Bosnia from the Chicago Tribune (fwd)
Date: 16 Dec 1992 03:45:35 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
Reply-To: Turkish Cultural Program List <TRKNWS-L%USCVM.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Forwarded message:
>From cms1.ucs.leeds.ac.uk!TEX5HAD Tue Dec 15 11:27:32 1992
Via: uk.ac.leeds.ucs.cms1; Tue, 15 Dec 1992 18:58:52 +0000
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 18:51:21 GMT
From: Haluk DEMIRBAG <TEX5HAD@cms1.ucs.leeds.ac.uk>
Subject: An article on Bosnia from the Chicago Tribune (fwd)
To: TRH@JACK.SNS.COM
Message-Id: <15 Dec 92 18:58:40 GMT #6363@UK.AC.LEEDS.CMS1>

8<----------------------------Cut here-(C)----------------------------->8
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 00:29:00 EDT
>From: ELAGOZ@EARN.UMIPHYS
Subject: Ann Arbor News dan Bosna ile ilgili haber


This article is written by Leslie H. Gelb.

The day will soon come when two groups of leaders
are charged with crimes against humanity in Bosnia:
the Serbs who are killing Muslims and driving them
from their homes, and the Western leaders who are do-
ing little to stop this unspeakable brutality.
  The Serbian policy of "ethnic cleansing" is worse
than a crime; it is evil.
  The West's failure to confront this evil is worse than
a blunder; it is an abdication of our humanity.
  We are speaking here not just of quagmires, but of
our souls. For if we allow evil to triumph in ex-Yugosla-
via, we will breed a cynicism so pervasive and profound
as to corrode the very basis of Western liberty and
smash every hope of fashioning a better world.
  The West's faint efforts in Bosnia - refusing to arm
Muslims for self-defense, but not defending them our-
selves; banning Serbian flights over Bosnia, but not en-
forcing the ban; denying asylum to refugees, but failing
to establish safe havens for them within Bosnia -
amount to unconscionable cynicism.
  It is as if we were given the chance to replay history
and confront Hitler as his troops marched into the
Rhineland in 1936 - knowing all we now know - and
once again simply scolded him and shrugged.
  To countenance genocide, and that is what the Serbs
are doing, is to say that evil does not matter, that noth-
ing matters, and that therefore almost anything is ac-
ceptable.
  Some of our ex-leaders see this with dagger-like clar-
ity. Rallying to Margaret Thatcher's trumpet, Ronald
Reagan recently told students at Oxford University
that "Evil still stalks the planet." Of Bosnia, he said:
"Our multilateral organizations must declare ethnic-
cleansing and the slaughter of civilians by military
forces unacceptable. And we must be prepared to put
weapons behind our words."
  George Shultz, his secretary of state, reinforced this
point last week with barely controlled rage: "When we
say, 'never forget, never again,' what are we talking
about? What is it that we shouldn't forget? Of course
the Jews in Germany, and, of course, what can happen
ff anti-Semitism gets out of hand. But more broadly,
we're saying, when forces of intolerance go wild, you
get a result that is basically intolerable. So if we say
'never again,' it means we say we shouldn't stand for
that."
  But our present leaders do not agree. Listen to those
who oppose stronger action in Bosnia. They say we
cannot commit greater force there for "merely hu-
manitarian" reasons. Listen again, "merely humanitar-
ian" reasons.
  When we come to think of humanitarian concerns as
"mere." we are arrivin at the end of civilization.

  Bush administration officials and Western European
leaders also tell us that sending 30,000 U.S. forces to
Somalia is acceptable, though "merely humanitarian,"
because the task there is "easy."
  On the other hand, they say that applying more force
to stop genocide in Bosnia is "too hard" and will draw
us into a quagmire.

  This argument is both grotesque and absurdly mis-
leading. Grotesque because combatting evil cannot
simply be dismissed as "too hard." The degree of diffi-
culty limits what it is possible to do and affects the
choice of means. But it does not alter the moral imper-
ative for meaninglul, non-cynical action. Misleading be-
cause the real alternatives in Bosnia are not the pre-
sent half-hearted relief effort and a quagmire.

  As Shultz argues and he's no bleeding-heart liber-
al - Bosnia presents "a definable, doable mission, and
it doesn't involve getting into a swamp." We can arm
the Muslims, enforce the trade embargo and the flight
ban over Bosnia, bomb Serbian forces in Bosnia and
military targets in Serbia, threaten to arm Serbia's op-
ponents elsewhere in ex-Yugoslavia and provide safe
havens in Bosnia.

  Most of these steps are beyond the vision and will of
the departing Bush team. Bill Clinton leans toward
more decisive measures, but his administration will
not take hold for more than a month. That places the
burden for immediate and strong action in Bosnia
squarely on Europe.

  If Europeans once again ignore genocide and evil
and decline to be their brothers' keepers, Americans
may not want to be Europe's keepers for much longer
either. Cynicism is indeed contagious. Americans may
come to believe that helping Europe through its latest
continent wide trials is "too hard" for "merely humani-
tarian" reasons.


The Chicago Tribune, 435 N. Michigan Ave.,
Chicago, Ill. 60611.
8<----------------------------Cut here-(C)----------------------------->8
            _
|-| /-\ |_ |_| |<