HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mann@src.dec.com (Tim Mann)
Subject: Re: Fischer rumor
Organization: DEC Systems Research Center
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 92 00:36:21 GMT

The Fischer-Spassky match story is appearing in the American
newspapers now.  It made the front page of the San Jose Mercury News
this morning.  They picked it up from the New York Times.

Here is the text, typed in without permission...

New York Times
  BELGRADE, Yugoslavia ---  Bobby Fischer, the onetime /enfant
terrible/ of world chess who became the first American to win the
world championship, will play a $5 million exhibition match in
Belgrade against Boris Spassky, the Russian he defeated for the title
20 years ago.

The match would end nearly two decades of seclusion for Fischer, now
49, since he played Spassky, now 55, in perhaps the most publicized
and widely followed chess match in the history of the game.

The brash, eccentric Fischer retired from chess two years after
defeating Spassky, becoming the only champion in history to forfeit
his title without suffering defeat.

The match, scheduled to begin Sept. 2, would probably be viewed as a
violation of the international sanctions against Yugoslavia imposed by
the United Nations in an effort to halt the fighting in
Bosnia-Herzegovina.

The promoter of the match is Jezdimir Vasiljevic, owner of a
Belgrade-based bank.

Under the contract, the winner of the match would receive $3.35
million and the loser $1.65 million.  In case of a draw, the two
contestants would share the prize money equally.
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: johanes@newton.ce.nd.edu (Johanes Suhardjo)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: numbering Tal's games
Keywords: perl, Tal, shell
Date: 27 Jul 92 16:29:22 GMT
Reply-To: suhardjo@ndcvx.cc.nd.edu
Distribution: na
Organization: Civil Engineering Notre Dame

In article <1992Jul24.123111.9562@rockyd.rockefeller.edu>, lora@popcbr.rockefeller.edu (Lora Frisch) writes:
|> Someone notified that my script for numbering the tal.txt has
|> some problems.  Since a shell script to do the numbering has
|> been posted, I suggest people use that.
|> > Lora --

I missed that shell script.  Could somebody email me?  Thanks a lot.

-- 

 Johanes Suhardjo	suhardjo@ndcvx.cc.nd.edu    johanes@certb.ce.nd.edu  
 ____________________________________________________________________________
|		       University of Notre Dame				     |
| Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences	(219) 239-7297               |
| P.O. Box 825, Notre Dame, IN 46556            (219) 277-3745		     | 
 ____________________________________________________________________________
From: smd@occlusal.rutgers.edu (Stanley Dunn)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Chess Bits
Keywords: volunteer editor
Date: 24 Jul 92 11:35:02 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.


I have agreed to take over Chess Bits from Benoni, starting
with the next issue.  Beginning immediately, send all
contributions to smd@occlusal.rutgers.edu

I think we all owe our thanks to Benoni for starting the 
newsletter and I hope that we can keep it going.  I shall
be seeking some of you out for contributions, so watch
your mailboxes!

For my first act as the new editor, I am immediately
taking a vacation and will return on 4 August, but dont
let this keep you from sending me your games and articles!

Stan Dunn
smd@occlusal.rutgers.edu
From: U13054@uicvm.uic.edu (Howard Wachtel)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Kolty's triple mate (Was: Castling and Check
Date: 30 Jul 92 03:48:04 GMT
 <1992Jul20.235847.14002@husc3.harvard.edu> <1992Jul24.201522.2472@sco.com>
 <1992Jul27.032504.23999@cis.uab.edu>
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago

In article <1992Jul27.032504.23999@cis.uab.edu>, hyatt@cis.uab.edu (Robert
Hyatt) says:

[...much deleted..]

>George Koltonowski (spelling incorrect, but don't any references at home to
>fix it.... sorry George...) used to tell a great story about playing a
>pick=up game on an airplane.  His "expert" opponent, promoted a pawn to
>a "king".  George got quite upset, but without a rulebook, couldn't convince
>his opponent that two kings wouldn't cut it.  He therefore promoted HIS
>pawn to an "opponent's" king and then mated all three.  You had to be there
>and see his arm=waving to appreciate it.  BTW, the rules I've seen always
>specified promoting to a piece of the same color excluding the king...

   For those who haven't seen this, this is one of the most hilarious
chess stories I've ever heard.  Here is the position reached in the
hypothetical game:

- - - - - - - -
P - - - - - - -
B B - - - - - P
- - - - - - - -       White (Kolty) to move
- - - - - N N -
- - - K - - - -
p - - - - - - p
k - - - - - - -

   Of course, the beginner on the airplane playing Black is several
pieces down, and any Black player with a sense of good sportsmanship
would have resigned a long time ago (so the story goes).

   So White plays 1 Kc2, leaving Black with no defense to the threat of
2 Bd4 mate.  But Black escapes by playing 1...h1=K!  "Didn't you say
that a pawn could promote to any other piece?"  Now if White checkmates
either King, he stalemates the other King. (!)  And if he does not, he
may very well stalemate _both_ Kings!

  But then an inspiration fell upon White--if he can do it, I can do it
too!  So White plays 2 a7-a8=Black King!!!   "But it's not the same color!"
Black protests.  "I never said anything about color!" White answers
cleverly.  Now Black has a move: 2...Kb8 3 h7 Ka8 4 h8=Q checkmating
all three Kings at once.   :-) :-) :-)
________________________________________________________________
Howard K. Wachtel              University of Illinois at Chicago
U13054@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU        Phone (312) 975-7970
From: ralf@ark.abg.sub.org (Ralf Stephan)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: Fischer's Rating
Date: 30 Jul 92 10:31
Organization: Private Coherent 3.2.1 site waiting for 4.0

mapmef@gdr.bath.ac.uk (M E Fletcher) writes:
> 
> When GM Henrique Mecking recently started playing again, I noticed
> his rating came in immediately at 2600+ partly as a result of his
> previous efforts. (Although he did extremely well to narrowly lose
> to Nikolic & Seirawan). The thought occurs that if Fischer returns
> to active chess, then heavily beats Spassky, his rating could immediately
> surge up to 2800, overtaking Kasparov's. Do the rating rules make 
> allowances for this sort of thing?

Are matches as those between Fischer and Spassky used for rating at all?
Just curious.

--ralf
------------------------------------------------- please ignore next sig!
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: gzogbi@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (George C Zogbi)
Subject: Re: What is the Colle system?
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 17:03:33 GMT

Yusupov *does* play the Colle with a queen side fianchetto. I have some
games of his with this system.  Besides you mention above that he plays b3 etc.
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: slazzeri@seas.gwu.edu (Santos Lazzeri)
Subject: Address at Saskatchewan for UMRAO developers
Organization: George Washington University
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 19:56:36 GMT

Hello  Everybody,

I am trying to find out the e-mail address for any of the following persons:

Dinesh Gadwal, Jim E. Greer, Gordon I. McCalla

They co-authored a paper called UMRAO: A Chess Endgame Tutor

and I would like to contact them. I know they were at the University of Saskatchewan
when the paper was written. (The paper was published at the 12th International Joint
Conference in Artificial Intelligence, Australia, August 1991). Please e-mail 
to: slazzeri@seas.gwu.edu

Thanks,


Santos G. Lazzeri

Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charles Blair)
Subject: Re: chess news 4/4
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: rec
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 22:36:18 GMT

   Just curious: was either of the Polgar sister's parents ever a master?
From: sailesh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Sailesh C Akkaraju)
Subject: Re: Tal games by FTP: query
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 21:05:09 GMT

	It is in research.att.com ( Not research@att.com )
				
					Sailesh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
					( NUMERO UNO )
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: direwolf@seismo.gps.caltech.edu (Kathy Watts)
Subject: Re: Computers & chess ethics
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 18:32:13 GMT

About ten years ago, I served on Dave Welsh's USCF Computer Chess committee,
and we tried to separate the computers in tournaments issue into two parts:

1. Commercial exploitation of chess tournaments and ratings by those with
   something to sell, which we wanted REMOVED from the tournament world, and

2. Research and testing by developers of all sorts (academics, commercial
   developers doing their work in person on experimental versions, and
   hobbyists), which we thought should continue to have access to play in
   any competition which would not be significantly disrupted by their
   participation.

The USCF has made the issue more controversial by holding type 1 tests as parts
of major tournaments, providing serious disruptions at times, and creating
much more opposition to ANY computer participation that would otherwise exist.

I've followed some of the recent thread on how and when computers "should"
be allowed in tournaments, and most of it is splitting hairs over meaningless
issues (please forgive my directness - some of these questions are interesting
in their own right, but do not address the greater question of "whether to 
allow computers at all").

Agreement should be sought on the basic premise:  It is a GOOD THING to 
continue to allow anyone trying to advance his/her/everyone's understanding
of the problems of how computers can be made to play chess, and to measure
the results of these attempts under MEANINGFUL CONDITIONS (i.e., at
tournaments).  This should be done with minimum impact on the tournaments
they enter, and with no obligation on the part of human participants unless
they agree otherwise.

It then follows that programs on PCs aren't going to disrupt most events.
But VERY STRONG programs like Deep Thought may, because they will affect
prizes, and therefore be contoversial.  Simple solution here: arrange 
tournaments for DT like the one last year in Germany - a round-robin of
very strong players, with everyone invited agreeing to accept DT as one
of the invitees.  Perhaps Bob Hyatt can discuss how many computers this
problem might involve.

Anyway, that's my $0.02!

-Hal Bogner
 NM, IA, organizer
 owner, Chess Laboratories
 etc....

(fuller disclosure available upon request!)
From: lee.matheson@synapse.isis.org (Lee Matheson) 
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: Fischer rusty?
Date: 29 Jul 92 21:52:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: SYNAPSE BBS - GATINEAU, QUEBEC - 819-561-4321
Reply-To: lee.matheson@synapse.isis.org (Lee Matheson) 

 SK> While it is true that Bobby has not made a single PUBLIC appearance in
 SK> about 2 decades isn't it also true that just a few years ago in a
 SK> special closed match he played a round robin with 6 of the top players
 SK> of the world and came out 6-0? I remember the Pres. of our local club
 SK> getting very excited about this when it happened.

That would have been some round robin, but I seriously doubt if it ever
happened!  Everyone would have known about it.  The games would have
been published everywhere.

Fisher in 24 or so?  Probably just as good as anyone elses prediction.
Too much time and too much water has gone under the bridge for me to
even venture a prediction.

Cheers,
Lee Matheson, Ottawa





... Reality-ometer:  [\........]  Hmmph!  Thought so...
--- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10
                                                                                           
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: prabhak@cs.umn.edu (Satya Prabhakar)
Subject: Re: Fischer rumor
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 17:14:26 GMT

The New York Times report states that the report was confirmed
by Spassky.
From: mapmef@gdr.bath.ac.uk (M E Fletcher)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Fischer's Rating
Date: 29 Jul 92 11:25:18 GMT
Organization: School of Mathematics, University of Bath, UK


When GM Henrique Mecking recently started playing again, I noticed
his rating came in immediately at 2600+ partly as a result of his
previous efforts. (Although he did extremely well to narrowly lose
to Nikolic & Seirawan). The thought occurs that if Fischer returns
to active chess, then heavily beats Spassky, his rating could immediately
surge up to 2800, overtaking Kasparov's. Do the rating rules make 
allowances for this sort of thing?

Matt
From: Bruce_Leverett@TRANSARC.COM
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: What is the Colle system?
Date: 27 Jul 92 16:54:52 GMT

>IMHO the Colle is complete crap which should be avoided like the plague.
>It is clearly inferior to the Torre Attack because the dark-squared
>bishop is confined to quarters for most of the game. Beginners like it
>because it is easy to play, since White's plans are so limited as to
>give one little to think about.
>
>Bottom line: Not one single strong player uses it.

Lots of people use the Colle Reversed (a.k.a. the Semi-Slav).  Does that count?

Historically, the lines where White fianchettoes his QB predate Colle (the
real person) by many years.  I found some examples of that line in the
book of the 5th American Chess Congress, 1890.  So perhaps that line should
not properly be called the Colle system.  The fact that people are playing it
now, therefore, doesn't count.

Strong players used to try out the Colle.  A game Alekhine-Reshevsky in which
Alekhine played the Colle was recently printed in Chess Life in one of the
articles about Reshevsky.  Does that count?

It's hard to take this argument completely seriously.  All the QP openings
where White doesn't play c4 are unambitious.  This goes for the Colle, the
Torre, the line with the QB fianchetto, and the lines with Bf4.  (In other
words, no matter where White puts his QB.)  At the international level, they
have brief periods of vogue, and then they're gone.  The Torre is having a
vogue now.  But it's no stronger than the others.

At less-than-international level, you can expect to see all those lines,
including the Colle, from time to time.  I've had the Colle played against
me by a 2300-rated and a 2100-rated player.  (I beat the former and lost to
the latter.  There's no logic in life.)

As White, there's no reason to avoid trying out the Colle.  If it feels good,
do it.


Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: moore@theory.chem.ubc.ca (Brian Moore)
Subject: Re: Fischer
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 17:58:02 GMT

In article <1992Jul30.235257.10899@ll.mit.edu> nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith) writes:
...
>
>the TV network news i saw showed a bearded Fischer getting into a car
>somewhere, which agrees with another description here.
...

This sounds quite a bit like the purported tape of Fischer shown
a few months back on Geraldo Rivera's 'Now it can be told.'  So,
it might not be recent.

--
Brian Moore
Chemistry Dept.  University of British Columbia
moore@theory.chem.ubc.ca
From: sharring@cs.tamu.edu (Steven L Harrington)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: Fischer and sanctions
Date: 27 Jul 1992 22:19:54 GMT
Distribution: rec.games.chess
Organization: Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University

In article <1992Jul27.183954@lglsun.epfl.ch> barbey@lglsun.epfl.ch (Stephane Barbey) writes:
>In article <1992Jul27.014417.25697@rata.vuw.ac.nz>, vova@kauri.vuw.ac.nz (Vladimir Pestov) writes:
>: The return of Bobby Fischer to chess is much more important than
>: maintaining sanctions against Yugoslavia.
>
>It's pathetic. Human rights are much more important than a game, even
>Chess. Some people are trying to save lives and you just crave for
>a show... 
>
>: Vladimir Pestov
>
>-Stephane
>
>--
>Stephane Barbey				"It's not easy getting real wings"	
>INJ-335, barbey@di.epfl.ch


I'm sure that all of those who are arguing against the Fischer-Spassky match's
venue have good intentions, but they are terribly naive. Do you really think
that the match will affect one way or another the human rights problems that
are taking place (there or anywhere else in the world)? Any relationship 
between chess and politics is contrived.

I suggest that those who attempt to tie art and politics together look at
historical attempts to do same. If a man isn't free to pursue art, which 
clearly victimizes noone, then what _is_ he free to pursue?         
Art uplifts all, denigrates none; art is the ultimate human rights advocate,
because it eloquently expresses man's ability to _create_ rather than his
over-used ability to _destroy_.

------------------------------------------------------------
| Steve Harrington ... Texas A&M University ... Comp. Sci. |
|                                                          |
| "Now I think they don't play chess. they make moves, but |
|  that's not chess. I have discovered their weaknesses,   |
|  and therefore I can win."                               |
|                                                          |
|  IGM David Bronstein, speaking of computers prior to     |
|  his 6-0 performance in the AEGON tournament.            |
------------------------------------------------------------
From: lee.matheson@synapse.isis.org (Lee Matheson) 
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: fischer rumor
Date: 29 Jul 92 22:05:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: SYNAPSE BBS - GATINEAU, QUEBEC - 819-561-4321
Reply-To: lee.matheson@synapse.isis.org (Lee Matheson) 

 Va> If Fischer really wants to prove himself, have him play Kasparov, I
 Va> predict Kasparov would walk away with it 10-0. Does anyone know what
 Va> Kasparov think about all of this?

No doubt a Kasparov on top of his form is pretty much undefeatable.
But I really doubt if Bobby Fischer is coming out of retirement to
prove himself.  I think he is coming out of retirement for the
thrill of playing again, and also possibly for the money.

I just hope UN sanctions don't apply, ... and I hope the match
takes place.  I think the chess world has only lots to gain by it.

McEnroe and Borg still play the occasional tennis match with the
older technology rackets (and they get paid to do it).  I think
the same should apply to "older" chess players.  In a way I'm 
surprised we don't see more of this.

Lee Matheson, Ottawa.

... Click ... click ... click ... damn, out of taglines!
--- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10
                                                                                                                   
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 15:33:13 -0400 
From: Louis Blair <lb2e+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: What is the Colle system?
	<SCHILLER.92Jul21164758@tira.uchicago.edu>
	<EePNR7C00VpJQb7FY7@andrew.cmu.edu>
	<SCHILLER.92Jul22163815@tira.uchicago.edu>

Eric Schiller wrote:
>IMHO the Colle is complete crap which should be avoided
>like the plague. ... Bottom line: Not one single strong player
>uses it.

I wrote:
>For an opposing point of view, here are some quotes from
>a book on openings that was published just a few years
>ago.  It classified the Colle as "good ... endorsed for use in
>tournament play. ... the Colle ... packs a lot more punch
>than it seems to. ... It is fully recommendable and is fortunate
>in having a fine literature penned by George Koltanowski,
>... Black ... must not underestimate the power of the Colle.
>Korchnoi and Spassky include it in their repertoires."

Eric Schiller writes:
>To be included in a repertoire one has to have played an
>opening more than once or twice. Can anyone provide
>documentation that Spassky and Korchnoi did indeed
>include the Colle in their repertoires in any post-puberty
>stage of their career.

My source for the above quotes was the book, Unorthodox
Openings by Joel Benjamin and Eric Schiller.  Perhaps
you could get in touch with the authors and ask them
for more details.
From: lb2e+@andrew.cmu.edu (Louis Blair)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Tarrasch said it.
Date: 28 Jul 92 19:10:18 GMT
	<1451600013@igc.org>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

In 1931, Dr. Siegbert Tarrasch wrote:

     If [the beginner] has ambition, if he would become
a master - well, PRACTICE makes the master.  Any moderately
talented player, he need not be exceptionally gifted, can become
a master.  But really, there is no need for that.  The right
standpoint is to play for PLEASURE - and do not think that
pleasure is proportional to skill.  The greatest bunglers are
constantly deriving the greatest pleasure from chess - they go
into ecstasies of delight when their Knight forks a King and
Queen.

     Chess is a form of intellectual productiveness, therein lies
its peculiar charm.  Intellectual productiveness is one of the
greatest joys - if not the greatest one - of human existence.
It is not everyone who can write a play, or build a bridge, or
even make a good joke.  But in chess everyone can, everyone
must, be intellectuallly productive and so can share in this
select delight.  I have always a slight feeling of pity for the
man who has no knowledge of chess, just as I would pity the
man who has remained ignorant of love.  Chess, like love,
like music, has the power to make men happy.
From: stank@perrault.net.com (Stan Knight)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: E-Chess
Date: 30 Jul 92 20:00:22 GMT
Organization: Network Equipment Technologies




I would like to get involved in playing matches/tourneys via E-mail. My current
USCF membership has expired but I would be more then willing to renew it if
it would help to get things started. Can anyone out there give me a clue as
how to the ball rolling.

Much thanks for any assistance rendered!

Stan Knight

********************************************************************************To err is human: to get really confused takes a middle game!!!
*******************************************************************************
From: lora@popcbr.rockefeller.edu (Lora Frisch)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: numbering Tal's games
Keywords: perl, Tal, shell
Date: 24 Jul 92 16:31:11 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Population Council, New York
Originator: lora@popcbr.rockefeller.edu

Someone notified that my script for numbering the tal.txt has
some problems.  Since a shell script to do the numbering has
been posted, I suggest people use that.
> Lora --
> 
> There seem to be a few problems with the script you posted.
> 
> It doesn't number the last game, for one thing.
> 
> More seriously, it occasionally mangles a game, like this:
> 
> white: Tal
> black: Ribli
> event: Tilburg 1980
> opening: B85/20 19 Be3
> result: +-+
> e4 c5 Nf3 d6 d4 cd4 Nd4 Nf6 Nc3 a6 a4 Nc6 f4 e6 Be2 Be7 OO
> OO Be3 Qc7 Qe1 Nd4 Bd4 e5 Be3 ef4 Bf4 Be6 Qg3 Nd7 Bh6 Qc5
> Kh1 Qe5 Bf4 Qc5 Be3 Qe5 Qf2 Qa5 Rfd1 Rac8 Nd5 Bd5 Rd5 Qb4 Bg4
> Qe4 Rd4 Qc6 Ra3 Rcd8 Rc3 Nc5 Bf3 Qe8 Rb4 Bf6 Rcc4 b5 ab5 a5
> Bc6 Qe6 Ra4 Bb2 Bc5 dc5 Qf1 Rd2 Re4 Qf5 Re1 Qc2 b6 Rd6 Qb5
> Rd1 Qf1 Re1 Qe1 Qg6 Qe4 Qh6 g3 Qc1 Kg2 Bd4 Bb5 Rb8 Ra2 g6
> b7 Kg7 Ba6
> 
> turns into:
> 
> white: Tal
> black: Ribli
> event: Tilburg 1980
> opening: B85/20 19 Be3
> result: +-+
> 
> 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cd4 4.Nd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.a4 Nc6 7.f4 e6 8.Be2
> Be7 9.OO OO 10.Be3 Qc7 11.Qe1 Nd4 12.Bd4 e5 13.Be3 ef4 14.Bf4 Be6
> 15.Qg3 Nd7 16.Bh6 Qc5 17.OO Kh1 18.Qe5 Bf4 19.Qc5 Be3 20.Qe5 Qf2
> 21.Qa5 Rfd1 22.Rac8 Nd5 23.Bd5 Rd5 24.Qb4 Bg4 25.OO Qe4 26.Rd4 Qc6
> 27.Ra3 Rcd8 28.Rc3 Nc5 29.Bf3 Qe8 30.Rb4 Bf6 31.Rcc4 b5 32.ab5 a5
> 33.OO Bc6 34.Qe6 Ra4 35.Bb2 Bc5 36.dc5 Qf1 37.Rd2 Re4 38.Qf5 Re1
> 39.Qc2 b6 40.Rd6 Qb5 41.OO Rd1 42.Qf1 Re1 43.Qe1 Qg6 44.Qe4 Qh6 45.g3
> Qc1 46.Kg2 Bd4 47.Bb5 Rb8 48.Ra2 g6 49.OO b7 50.Kg7 Ba6
> 
> White castles early and often, at moves 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, and 49, and
> the other moves are pushed back.
> 
> 
-- 
lora@popcbr.rockefeller.edu
Unix Systems Administrator
The Population Council
Center for Biomedical Research
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess