From: 00vmszopa@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: The US - laughing stock of the world
Date: 12 Nov 92 19:45:17 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1diocbINNa2b@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, ck347@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Richard A. Mulac) writes:
> 
>   I can't believe it.  President-elect Bill Clinton's mistress, Gennifer
> Flowers, posing nude in this month's Penthouse.  We have gone from the
> envy of the world to the butt of it's jokes.  Even if you don't believe 
> that she was his mistress, she was a close confidant whom he trusted.

HEY, BUDDY! WE'VE STILL GOT THE MOST ACCURATE MEGATONNAGE ON EARTH! WE CAN
BUST YOUR HEAD WIDE OPEN IF WE WANT!! AND EVERYONE YOU'VE EVER SEEN!

YOU THINK AMERICA'S FUNNY???!?!?

YOU WANNA GET BLASTED? JUST KEEP ON MAKIN' FUN OF THE U.S.OF.A!

> If his judgment allowed him to choose for a close trusted friend a person 
> who would spill true or untrue details of an intimate relationship to the
> press and embarrass him by posing nude in a magazine, what kind of people 
> will he pick to help him run the country using that same "judgment"?
> I guess one thing we'll be short of during the next four years is family
> values at the top.  I just hope he doesn't turn the White House into a
> brothel like Kennedy did.  What a black eye on the United States of
> America.  Oh, the shame of it all!
> 

Actually, I'm just kidding. A little. It's shameful. But it's human and earthy
and not really that big of a deal. It is, for instance, much more shameful that
the last few administrations have released thousands of mentally ill individuals
onto our streets, and instigated the largest financial crises of modern memory
(S&L's, junk-bond hell, pension-plan raiders high on autoReaganomic stimulation)
.

I'm appalled that you and millions of others consider the president's sex life
to be more important and significant (in fact, ultimately significant) than
the criminal and immoral wrongdoing of our highest officials and businesspeople.


>   I know, maybe if we start now we can develop a campaign based on the 
> theme "America wants change".  I'm sure the American people will go for
> it and elect someone else in 1996.
> 
> -- 
> Richard Mulac                                       ck347@cleveland.freenet.edu
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>        1996 election countdown - 1459 more days         | These pontifications 
>  until the Democrats are thrown out of the White House  |      are my own!     

Oh yeah? We've got a good old boy on the button now, and he's not gonna hit
the chicken switch! We'll turn that percentage of the electorate so unwise as
to vote for the losing candidate into powder!

:) I'm just into this power trip thing since Bush lost. I don't mean to offend,
only to reject the importance people place on this especially in the light
that Bush is an adulterer too. I suppose it's okay because HE'S kept it quiet
(Source: SPY magazine, October of this year. "1,001 Reasons Not to Vote for 
George Bush").

-------------------------------------------------------------------
00vmszopa@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu                            Vinney Szopa
Ball State University		Muncie, IN			USA
Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty
"We must go on. We have to go on!" --Kane in  A L I E N
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:59868 alt.rush-limbaugh:9562 talk.rumors:1243 alt.activism:18707 alt.politics.elections:23636