From: mghayalo@uceng.uc.edu (Manoj Ghayalod)
Subject: Re: Moslems@
Organization: University of Cincinnati
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 20:04:54 GMT


>>>
>>>This is absolutely wrong to say that every porblem is caused by muslims. 
>>>In fact the case is reverse, every porblem is created for the muslim. 
>>>For example  in india , before the british invasion,there was used to be 
>>>a muslim rule. In that more than 1000 years rule we donot find any
>>>hindu-muslim conflict. Even some of the Mughal Emperors used to have
>>>Hindu Wives. There was peace and harmony. But when hindu came into 
>>>power , after british left india, they started planning to demolish
>>>all the mosques in india. In fact , on the eve of the establishment
>>>of Pakistan there was a movement in india to convert all the muslims
>>>to hinduism by force .
>>
>>Yes the Mughals were the greatest, but nobody has anwsered Satwinder's
>>questions.  If inter religioun marriages define peace and harmony in a
>>country, then in India now we have more such marriages than in that 
>>took place in the Mughal era.
>>1. Mumtaz's husband is a Hindu
>>2. Amir Khan's wife is a Hindu
>>3. Sonam has a Hindu hasband
>
>>4. Sunil Dutt married a Muslim.
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>    Manoj I think Nargis was a Zorastrian(Parsee).
Sorry I may be wrong about that.  But the point I am trying to make
is that there are more inter religion marriages now than ever before.
More examples are
Farha, Madhu Bala and Navab Patuadi.
>>
>>These are just the popular ones.
>>Who told you that there was a movement to convert all Muslims to Hindus?
>>Don't we have different laws for them.  And about Hindu rule in India,
>>as far as I know none of the PMs declared themselves as Hindus, they
>>have always said that they believe in all faiths.  Rajiv Gandhi's father
>>was a Parsi, I don't know what religion he followed.  
>>
>>Don't worry about the Mughals, none of us were there then so we cannot
>>be certian if things were peaceful during their rule.  In the subcontinent
>>India has a Hindu majority and Pakistan has a Muslim majority.  The world
>>agrees that India is a fair country and the world knows what Pakistan
>>did to its fellow Muslims in Bangladesh.
>>
>>>Now surprisingly we find the exact situation in Spain. The same 
>>>country used to have muslims rule and in that rule we find no
>>>muslim-xtians tussle. But when xtians took over the charge they
>>>killed each and every muslim there just like they are killing 
>>>muslims in Bosnia. The president of France has already announced
>>>that Europe must be devoid of any muslim country.
>>>
>>>
>>>If you please answer me the following questions .
>>>
>>>India can have nuclear weapons but Pakisatan cannot
>>>Israel can have nuclear weapons but Iraq cannot 
>>>South Africa can have nuclear weapons but Sudan cannot
>>>Why ?
>>>West is helping dying people in Somalia but why the same
>>>is blind over the massacre of people in Bosnia ? 
>>
>>What is wrong with you dude?  When has the West said that it is OK
>>for India to have nuclear weapons.
> You know I was listening to Radio Australia about 5 weeks ago and some
> guy said that India had the capablity to make nuclear weapons but did
> not have any. Furthermore I do not think that the Non-Proliferation Treaty
>allows even India to have nuclear weapons.Correct me if I am wrong.
>>>
That is what I am saying.  The West does not want India to build
Nuclear weapons.  I think Mustafa was saying that only Muslim
countries are not allowed to build nuclear weapons.

Manoj

Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan