HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ralf@wilma.physik.uni-stuttgart.de (Ralf Hirning)
Subject: Re: DXSession freezing (Motif 1.1.3,UWS 4.3)
Reply-To: ralf@wilma.physik.uni-stuttgart.de (Ralf Hirning)
Organization: ITAP University of Stuttgart
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 09:07:39 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.152153.9535@parsifal.umkc.edu>,
archerb@gawain.umkc.edu (Barry Archer) writes:
|> 
|>   Symptom: User tries to pull down a session manager window.  The display
|> freezes, except for the mouse.  One needs to log in remotely and kill the
|> session manager to regain conreol of the display.
|> 
|>   This is occuring on a 5000/200 PX, 5000/200 PXG and 5000/240 HX.
|> 
|> 
|>   Also: the DECstation 5000/200 PX cannot be left with the screen in
paused mode
|> overnight without risking the DECstation refusing logins.  The
display cannot
|> be un-paused, and remote logins get connected, but no login prompt.
|> 
|> Thanks,
|> 
|> 
|> Barry Archer 
|> archerb@gawain.umkc.edu	
|> 
|>   "Madness is the result not of uncertainty but certainty."
|> 	- Friedrich Nietzsche
|> 

Hallo,

I had the same problem.

After adding the options -su -bs -once to X-Server ( in /etc/ttys ) the
problems disappears.


Ralf Hirning
ITAP
University of Stuttgart
Pfaffenwaldring 57
D-7000 Stuttgart 80
Germany
From: lenneis@statrix1.wu-wien.ac.at (Joerg Lenneis)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Fortran compilation problem
Date: 9 Nov 1992 16:53:30 GMT
Organization: University of Economics and Business Administration Vienna
Distribution: world
Reply-To: lenneis@wu-wien.ac.at
NNTP-Posting-Host: statrix1.wu-wien.ac.at

In article <1992Nov6.165714.3139@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>, shenkin@still3.chem.columbia.edu (Peter Shenkin) writes:
|> 
|> System:  ULTRIX 4.2 0 RISC
|> 
|> I have a long source module with about a half-dozen subroutines in it.  I
|> was making modifications to one routine, near the middle of the file.
|> When I removed an IF...ENDIF construct near the beginning of the routine,
|> attempts to compile the module started giving the following:
|> 
|> f77  -static -g  -c bmin1a.f
|> Fatal error in: /usr/lib/cmplrs/fort/decfort Segmentation fault
|> *** Error code 1
|> 
|> Stop.

< stuff deleted>

We got strange errors of that kind from the Fortran and C compilers 
when one of our 8 MB storage modules broke down. You might want to 
check the hardware. 


-- 
Joerg Lenneis

University of Economics and Business Adminstration
Department for Applied Statistics and Data Processing
Augasse 2-6, 1090 Vienna, Austria

Tel. *43/222/31336 4758
email: lenneis@wu-wien.ac.at
From: news@drsrv1.hmi.de (News-Operator)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Q: Which events should I 'audit'?
Keywords: auditd, security, disk space
Date: 12 Nov 92 13:20:35 GMT
Organization: Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin GmbH

I use 'auditd' to keep control what happens on our machine (Ultrix 4.2).
Because of the huge amount of data generated by it we have to
reininitialize the daemon every night. Nevertheless, some 10MB of data
are on my disks at midnight.

One way of reduction is to select less events in my file 'audit_events'.
I would like to ask you all what your events file looks like.

Ahh, for security reasons: probably you don't want to tell me your
security details :-) The question for you is: Do you know which events
produce more data (-> appear more often) then others but are to be
considered 'trusted'.

Thanks in advance -Andreas.
From: ccdarg@dct.ac.uk (Alan Greig)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Fuji M2266sa (transtec) under ultix 4.1 - newfs hangs
Date: 5 Nov 92 11:00:58 GMT
Organization: Dundee Institute of Technology

I'm posting this for a colleague. I can add that there does not
seem to be a hardware fault with the disk as it runs no problem
on a VAXstation under VMS (can I say VMS in this group?).

He's running Ultrix 4.1 and I did wonder if this might be the root of
the problem. Only other thing is that VMS sho dev/full reports
Cylinders: 1654 ; tracks per cyl: 15 ; sectors per track: 85
- which doesn't quite seem to match the disktab table. Changing the
 ns and nc disktab entries to match doesn't make any difference though.
Maybe something else is needed but I'm not that familiar with ultrix.

I'll stay in this group to read replies or just mail
me and I'll forward any info on. 

Here's the message:
================================
I have recently purchased a Fujisu M2266SA hard disk (1079 M) from a
company who told me that it could be used as a RZ57 on my Decstation
(5000/200) running Ultrix 4.1.
However, when I received the disk, there are instructions to put the
following to the /etc/disktab:

	fuj1080|FUJ1080|Fujitsu M2266SA Winchester:\
        :ty=winchester:ns#84:nt#15:nc#1656:\
        :pa#32768:ba#8192:fa#1024:\
        :pb#131072:bb#8192:fb#1024:\
        :pc#3907911:bc#8192:fc#1024:\
        :pd#0:bd#8192:fd#1024:\
        :pe#0:be#8192:fe#1024:\
        :pf#0:bf#8192:ff#1024:\
        :pg#3744071:bg#8192:fg#1024:\
        :ph#0:bh#8192:fh#1024:

Then the following commands are issued:

	# cd /dev    
	# MAKEDEV rz<ID>		SCSI ID =3 in this case


All went well until I tried to create a new file system on the disk :

	newfs /dev/rrz3c fuj1080

which caused the machine to hang. Can somebody tell me why ?

-- 

Alan Greig                            Janet: Alan@UK.AC.DUNDEE-TECH
Dundee Institute of Technology	   Internet: Alan@DCT.AC.UK
Tel: (0382) 308810
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: smw@alcor.concordia.ca ( Steven Winikoff )
Subject: Re: CD-ROM is really a pseudoterminal??
Keywords: Gak!  Ugh!  Pfui!
Organization: Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 19:55:09 GMT

I hate to disagree with Boyd Roberts, as he obviously knows what he's
talking about (as demonstrated in many other posts to this group,
among others). 

But...


In article <1992Nov12.135412.18066@prl.dec.com>, boyd@prl.dec.com (Boyd Roberts) writes:
> In article <5435@daily-planet.concordia.ca>, smw@alcor.concordia.ca ( Steven Winikoff ) writes:
> >
> >    "ufs_mount: /dev/rz5c on /CD: Mount device busy"
> 
> Mount is telling you that /CD is busy, not /dev/rz5c.  Check out who's
> using /CD.

Uh, I *really* don't think so.  There are no processes using /CD, and
only the one process using /dev/ptyra.  Either that, or else pff is
totally hosed, and I don't think that's the case.  Even if it were...


> Either something's already mounted on /CD or there's a process in /CD.
> Why not make a new directory and mount it on that, and worry about /CD later?

I *did* try this.  I created a brand-new, empty directory.  I remembered
not to cd into the new directory (1/2 :-).   I tried to mount /dev/rz5c on
the new directory.  No go.

On the other hand...


> Block and character device namespaces are distinct.  Either pff has
> a bug or you invoked it incorrectly.

Now *that* is news to me, but then as I mentioned in a previous post, I
make no pretensions toward being a kernel hacker.

It may be that pff incorrectly assumes that any two devices with
identical major and minor numbers are necessarily the same device.  *I*
certainly thought so :-)

I notice that ofiles (which I didn't run yesterday) reports that nobody
is using /dev/rz5c, even though pff still finds the telnet process on
ptyra.

So what's left?   I still think that "recycling" major and minor numbers
is a particularly strange thing to do, but if it really has no bearing
on my case, what does?

It's definitely not that the mount point directory is busy.  I can't
find any other processes using the "real" /dev/rz5c.  So why won't
mount do what I want it to do?

HELP!!!

      - Steven 
________________________________________________________________________
Steven Winikoff      |       smw@         | "I don't want to run the
Software Analyst     | alcor.concordia.ca | world; I merely want to own
Computing Services   |                    | a substantial portion of the
Concordia University | (514) 848-7619     | preferred stock" - Alan Dean
Montreal, QC, Canada | (10:00-18:00 EST)  | Foster,  Cat-A-Lyst
From: hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu (Eiji Hirai)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Is local caching configurable?
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:17:26 GMT
Organization: Information Services, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA

mjr@hussar.dco.dec.com (Marcus J. Ranum) writes:
> Some vendors do what they call "asynchronous NFS" in which
> the server acks the write *before* it is written to stable
> storage (usually the server's volatile buffer cache). This
> violates the protocol

Out of morbid curiosity, does any vendor ship their OS like this?  If so,
I'd be more than interested in knowing which.  Or do vendors just do this in
their NFS lab "tests" to spruce up their glossy sales brochures?

--
hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu (Eiji Hirai)    :     :    :   :  : :: ::: :::: :::::
Unix Geek for Swarthmore College        :     :    :   :  : :: ::: :::: :::::
Information Services, Swarthmore, PA, US.       Copyright 1992 by Eiji Hirai.
I don't speak for Swarthmore College.                    All Rights Reserved.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: stan@sabaac.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Andrew Staniszewski)
Subject: setting limits for users
Reply-To: staniszewski@mayo.edu
Organization: Mayo Foundation
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 15:05:09 GMT

Hi,

I want to set up a default limit for users which would limit coredumpsizes
to 0

ie 

csh> limit coredumpsize 0

or

ksh> ulimit -c 0


ksh has an /etc/profile that I could place such a command in,
but I can not find a corrisponding file for csh


can anyone suggest a manner for setting this limit?

Xref: sparky comp.unix.ultrix:8296 comp.sys.dec:5941
From: raz@cs.hw.ac.uk (Ross A Macintyre)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix,comp.sys.dec
Subject: exporting file system read only AND -r=0 for certain clients
Date: 13 Nov 92 14:47:07 GMT
Organization: Dept of Computing & Electrical Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Scotland

Is it possible to export a filesytem with root access to some clients
and read-only to others?
I would have thought that this was possible, but after I experimented with a
line like this:

/depot -r=0 client1 client2 client3 -o client4 client5

it seems that the -o in the line causes it to be read only to all the clients.

Is this the way it should work?


Ross
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: farhad@CS.Stanford.EDU (Farhad Shakeri)
Subject: Compiling  codes under OSF/1 T1.2-1  ALPHA M500
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:32:52 GMT


Hi folks,

I need some advise on compiling codes under  ALPHA M500.

First of ALL  what is OSF/1 T1.2-1  based on?  Is this
a SYSV4  MUCH  BSD POSIX ULTRIX?  !combination!

Compiling is no problem,  executing is the problem.

to be more specific:  I have tried to compile
tcsh 6.00 or 6.01 or 6.02 on Alpha but the
binary when run gives me error when I use pipes 
i.e.  ls -CF | more

this is the error I get:

   tcsh: setpgid error (Not owner).
       or
   tcsh: setpgid error


X11R5 was compiled with no problem with some tweaking
but I have not run it yet so I would not know the result yet!

I compiled  ghostview and gs to view OSF documents
for tuning  OSF but I got billions of errors like:

Unaligned access pid=14523 <gs> va=1400370e4 reg=27 type=ldq pc=120064848 ra=120059104


So if some OSF,ALPHA  guys/gals can give me a call or email me some hints
on how to play with this new beast, I would be appreciated!

Thanks alot


Farhad Shakeri
Computer science Dept.
Stanford University

(415) 723-0009


-- 

   "Switch the computer off, wait 30 seconds and switch it on again
     if nothing happens."
					"Stepping Up To OS/2 2.0"

Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: zhao@adx.adelphi.edu (Bin Zhao)
Subject: Memory upgrade for DecSystem 5500
Organization: Adelphi University
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 20:41:52 GMT

Could somebody please tell me if it's possible to use third-party memory
chips to upgrade the DecSystem 5500? If yes, what is the good company I
should go for? Thanks in advance.

-- 
 Bin Zhao  <zhao@adx.adelphi.edu>
From: hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu (Eiji Hirai)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: psroff
Date: 11 Nov 92 01:07:15 GMT
Organization: Information Services, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA

beck@freia.inf.tu-dresden.de writes:
> found not to have a psroff command on my ultrix

Get it from ftp.uunet.ca:/distrib/chris_lewis/psroff/.  It compiled without
any problems on my Ultrix 4.2A system and I use it daily.

--
hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu (Eiji Hirai)    :     :    :   :  : :: ::: :::: :::::
Unix Geek for Swarthmore College        :     :    :   :  : :: ::: :::: :::::
Information Services, Swarthmore, PA, US.       Copyright 1992 by Eiji Hirai.
I don't speak for Swarthmore College.                    All Rights Reserved.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix,comp.sys.dec
From: wnkretz@ikesg1.energietechnik.uni-stuttgart.de (Oliver Kretzschmar)
Subject: Is it possible to upgrade from Ultrix 4.2 to 4.3 - Need Info
Organization: IKE
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 07:11:05 GMT



    Hey,

    is it possible to upgrade from Ultrix 4.2 to Ultrix 4.3 (DECstations) 
    without loosing program datas ? Could you please mail me
    your informations.

    Thanks for your efforts,

        Oliver
-- 
 NAME : O.Kretzschmar                      Inst.IKE / University Stuttgart
 PHONE: +49 711 685 2130                           Pfaffenwaldring 31
 FAX  : +49 711 685 2010                            7000 Stuttgart 80
 EMAIL: wnkretz@ikesg1.energietechnik.uni-stuttgart.de
From: s_uriart@irau35.ira.uka.de (Juan Uriarte)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Sockets on a 5000/120
Date: 12 Nov 1992 17:01:47 GMT
Organization: University of Karlsruhe, FRG
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: irau35.ira.uka.de

Hi.
Im trying to do the following:
start a process on a socket (a daemon)
wait for someone to call
fork and exec a process for the caller

I can do all but i cant change stdin and stdout of the exec'ed 
process to the socket.I've tried 3 aprouches now and none will 
work.First directly dup2 of stdout to the socket,wont work.
Them creating a pipe and having 3 processes in the background,
one reads from the pipe and writes into the socket,another reads
the socket and writes into the pipe,while the third does and exec
of the program i want to run after changing stdin and stdout to 
the ends of the pipes.But the damned system wont let me close
stdin and stdout,so it just wont work.And now i just did something
like: fd=dup(socket);  myfile=fopen(fd,"r+'); and then a dup2 .
But as usual the dup2 wont work,giving me the habitual errno 9.
I can write into the socket with fprintf(myfile,"something\n"),
and see at the other end what i wrote(after fflush),but i want it
to be completely transparent to program being exec'd.
Any clues? Any pointer for TSM?
Thanks in advcance.
BTW:if you didnt notice i am new to unix.Did a two week course,just
to get my actual account,but that was obviously not enough.
From: sybertz@brsux0.bro.dec.com (Sybertz Marc)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Backing up on TLZ06
Date: 6 Nov 92 09:10:22 GMT
Article-I.D.: rdg.1992Nov6.091022.12846
Reply-To: sybertz@ketje.enet.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Brussels


DECnsr (Network Save and Restore) can be a solution you should investigate.

With this layered product, you are able to define shedules that automatically
starts backup during night.

You don't have to make a shutdown of your machine to single user.
DECnsr gives you the guarantee that if a file has been changed during it
was backuped, you will receive a notification message telling you which
file have been changed, and up to you to restart the backup for this
particular file or not.

DECnsr supports SunOS, HP-UX, IBM-AIX, PC-DOS, OSF/1, ...

Ask for a demonstration to your local sale's representative. When you will
see it, you will understand why so much people use it today.

Regards,
Marc Sybertz.

+------------------------------------------+
| From : Marc Sybertz                      |
| Dept : EIS - Unix Service Center         |
| Func : Unix System Management Specialist |
| Mail : sybertz@ketje.enet.dec.com        |
| Loc  : DIGITAL - BRO (Brussels, Belgium) |
+------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: system@asuvax.eas.asu.edu (Marc Lesure)
Subject: UUCP modem configuration
Keywords: PEP V.32 L-devices
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 08:24:19 GMT

I have three classes of 9600 baud modems (PEP, V32, and both).  I would
prefer that my PEP modem doesn't call a V.32 modem and visa-versa.  Is
there a way to define different types of modems other that ACU and DIR in
the L-devices file?  I'd like to be able to have classes PEP for my Telebit,
V32 for my USR, ACU for 2400 baud using either, and someother class
for my T2500 (both PEP and V.32).  Any suggestions?  I'm running Ultrix
4.2a rev 47.  Thanks.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Lesure / Arizona State University / Tempe, AZ
"Between the world of men and make-believe, I can be found..."
"False faces and meaningless chases, I travel alone..."
"And where do you go when you come to the end of your dream?"

UUCP:       ...!ncar!noao!asuvax!lesure  
Internet:   lesure@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: avolio@dco.DEC.COM (Frederick M. Avolio)
Subject: Re: Telnet not working ????
Reply-To: avolio@dco.DEC.COM (Frederick M. Avolio)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp., Washington ULTRIX Resource Center
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 22:02:53 GMT


In article <1992Nov12.202325@phwoof.ph.kcl.ac.uk>, sjg@phwoof.ph.kcl.ac.uk (Simon Gornall) writes:
>In article <1992Nov12.195026.26325@decuac.dec.com>, avolio@dco.DEC.COM (Frederick M. Avolio) writes:
>
>|> Do you have telnetd installed?   /usr/etc/telnetd.  
>
>We certainly do. And we can "telnet asterix 25" to send mail, or "telnet asterix
>1617" to connect to the empire port. It's most strange.

neither of your examples answers the question.  You don't need telnetd in
place to do either one of them. So, I am sorry
to restate the question:  Does "ls -l /usr/etc/telnetd" work on the
target machine?  

Does the target machine have any errors in the syslog file?
WHat happens when one tries to telnet to the target machine?
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: mskucher@math.uwaterloo.ca (Murray S. Kucherawy [MFCF])
Subject: Re: X fonts
Organization: Math Faculty Computing Facility, University of Waterloo, Canada
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 16:40:24 GMT

ingber@worldbank.org (Daniel Ingber) writes:
>Maybe this is somewhere obvious, but here it goes:
>
>How does one install new fonts in the Ultrix X-server ?  and
>Is there a place on the net where we can get public domain fonts?

Can't help you with the second one, but use "xset fp+ pathname" for
the first.  See "man xset" and "man Xws" for more information.

-- Murray S. Kucherawy ----------------------------------------+--------------
Software Systems Co-op, Math Faculty Computing Facility [MFCF] | All spelling
University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada                        | errors caused
E-mail: mskucherawy@{math,watdragon}.UWaterloo.ca              | by Pnews.
---------------------------------------------------------------+--------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: mckay@gimli.bio.purdue.edu (Dwight McKay)
Subject: xdtm for Ultrix 4.2A?
Reply-To: mckay@gimli.bio.purdue.edu (Dwight McKay)
Organization: Department of Biological Science, Purdue University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 19:52:32 GMT

Has anyone built xdtm 2.5 under Ultrix?

--
--Dwight D. McKay, Purdue University, Department of Biological Sciences
--Office: LILY B-145, Phone: (317) 494-4481
--mckay@gimli.bio.purdue.edu
From: munish@maitland.cs.ucf.edu (Munish Jain)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: quota -v doesn't work on client machines
Summary: quota/client
Keywords: quota, client
Date: 3 Nov 92 21:29:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: maitland.munish.720826164
Distribution: comp
Organization: University of Central Florida

hi

We have a network of DEC 5000 stations. The filesystem
from server machine is mounted on its clients. We have
quotas for ther users but "quota -v" works only on
the server and not on any of the clients.

Does anyone know about it ? Are there any fixes ?

Any pointers will be appreciated.

munish
--
All that glitters has a high refractive index.
From: ponder@bcserv.wustl.edu (Ponder (Jay))
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Anonymous ftp Site for 5000/240 FPU Test
Date: 11 Nov 92 00:11:16 GMT
Organization: Washington University in Saint Louis, MO USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcserv.wustl.edu
Summary: Anonymous ftp Site for 5000/240 FPU Test Case
Keywords: DEC 5000/240 FPU Test Case

In response to the recent requests for the 5000/240
FPU test program, I've put it up for anonymous ftp
on dasher.wustl.edu (128.252.162.151) in the
subdirectory /pub/test240. There are actually two
test suites: the original "smith" test that was
posted to the net over the summer, and the "ponder"
test that we developed (to our horror!!) locally.

Source is given for the Smith test, an executable
for the Ponder test (since it is part of a very
large program). Most machines with the FPU errors
will fail both tests, but we do know of machines
that pass Smith and fail Ponder.

Maybe I'm naive, but I'm EXTREMELY PEEVED that DEC
apparently still has machines out there with this
problem. There is a hardware fix, an altered CPU
card that DEC gave us several weeks ago. I'm
AMAZED that DEC has not "quietly" replaced the
CPU on the early 240's with the fix. The FPU error
can, in our experience, range from very, very
slight to obvious. It certainly can vary from
machine to machine. This is a VERY, VERY serious
problem (we were lucky and only lost three months
of computations) -- please test your 240's if
you haven't yet! And demand repair if they are
faulty....

                Jay W. Ponder
                Asst. Prof, Biochem & Mol Biophys
                Washington Univ. Med School
                ponder@comet.wustl.edu
                (314) 362-4195
From: andrewr@iagu.itd.adelaide.edu.au (Andrew Rutherford)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: CHECKING FOR INVITATION ON CALLER'S MACHINE  ??
Date: 7 Nov 1992 05:32:19 GMT
Organization: The University of Adelaide
NNTP-Posting-Host: iagu.itd.adelaide.edu.au
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Peter Blaudeck (blk@physik.tu-chemnitz.de) wrote:
+ What does this message mean ?
+ I use ULTRIX 4.2a and cannot "talk" to any other computer.
+ All other network services are working well.

	It means (if you really didn't get any responce), that you're
trying to talk to a machine running SunOS which is still using the old
byte-order dependant version of talk, not the modern (BSD 4.3) version
that everyone else uses. The fix is to install ntalk on the Sun - using
otalk on the DEC won't help as you then have two machines speaking a
byte order dependant protocol of different byte sexes.

	Andrew.

/*
 * Andrew Rutherford                 andrewr@itd.adelaide.edu.au
 * +61 8 228 5669            Real Programmers always confuse Christmas and
 * Room 1060, Adelaide Uni      Halloween because OCT 31 == DEC 25 !
 */
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: sjg@phwoof.ph.kcl.ac.uk (Simon Gornall)
Subject: Telnet not working ????
Organization: King's College London Image Processing Group
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 18:52:54 GMT
X-Posted-From: dogmatix.ph.kcl.ac.uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

Has anyone had problems with telnet not working (just for login - telnet machine
 25 still works to connect to the mail server etc.) We can rsh in to these
machines, but not telnet. It's pretty important, because we need to give accounts
to people with no other machines to rsh from!

All other internet things seem to work fine, nfs mounting, rsh, X serving. The
works - APRT FROM THE BL**DY login!!!

(ahem). All advice gratefully recieved.

Simon.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix