HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE: Yet another memory configuration question
From: Alan Cantrell <CANTRELL@VUCTRVAX.BITNET>
Date: 14 Oct 1992 15:36:54 -0500
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

My best advice (for what that's worth) is to look at MSD
(Microsoft Diagnostics) and find out were you can put the
page frame.  It will also tell you about available UMB's.
There are other utilities that will do this, but MSD shows
you a picture, which eliminates the need to do HEX
arithmetic ;-)
 
--Alan
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: V4.1-1
From: N Werner Mortensen <WERNER@MFC.PANUM.KU.DK>
Date: 11 Oct 1992 14:40:00 +0100
X-VMS-Cc: WERNER
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Hello fellow PathWorkers,
 
I upgraded our VAX3900 PathWorks server to PathWorks for VMS V4.1-1 which I
received under contract from local DEC. It contained mostly token ring stuff
but the few other fixes I thought would do server some good.
 
The upgrade went well execpt for one thing: My intrusion database get swamped
with the node names of all my perfectly legitimate PC clients including my own.
I cannot register any lack of performance but I sure would like to fix this
intrusion thing in order to operate a clean machine. There is no indication in
the various log files.
 
Did anybody ran in to this problem besides me ?
 
 
Regards,
**************************************************************************
*  N. Werner Mortensen		Phone:    +45 3135 7900  ext 2530	 *
*  Network Manager		Fax:      +45 3135 7657			 *
*  The Faculty of Medicine	Home:     +45 3174 9212			 *
*  University of Copenhagen						 *
*  Blegdamsvej 3		Internet: werner@mfc.panum.ku.dk	 *
*  DK-2200 Copenhagen N		X.25:     238301043056::werner (DEC PSI) *
*  Denmark			DECnet	  52482::werner			 *
**************************************************************************
From: newsmgr@elmrd6.ineab.ikea.se
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Re: Problem w long filenames
Date: 7 Oct 92 12:59:23 +0200
Organization: IKEA Northern Europe AB

In article <1992Oct7.110617.3@elmrd6.ineab.ikea.se>, anos@elmrd6.ineab.ikea.se writes:
> 
> Hi there !
> 
> Does anyone have a solution to the LONG-FILENAME-PROBLEM during file
> transfers from VMS-mounted disk to PC diskette.
> 
> If you have a file named A_VERY_LONG_FILENAME.SPECIAL on your Vax,
> created by WP (?), then trying to access this file from the DOS prompt
> will fail. You don't even see it in the DIR listing...
> 
> What to do (besides renaming it to A.WP). We have over 1000 files on
> a documentation disk that should be moved to local harddisks...
> 

To clarify, we are using PW 4.1, DOS 5.0 and VMS 5.4-3

Anders Ostling IKEA NORTHERN EUROPE AB
Mail to: anos@elmrd6.ineab.ikea.se
From: RONAU%CUTTER%OPUS@MCOIARC.BITNET
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE: Fast NICs for fast PCs....on Pathworks.
Date: 7 Oct 92 13:54:00 GMT
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Themos,
 
We ordered a Dec EISA 32 bit network board.  When it comes in we hope to
do some testing with it.  I'll let you know the results.
 
 
 
 Theodore F. Ronau               ------------------------------------------
 Network & Small System Manger   | First try Esc, then Ctrl/Break, Ctrl/C |
 Information Systems             | or Ctrl/Z, Ctrl/Alt/Del, the On/Off    |
 Medical College of Ohio         | Switch, and if all else fails, PRAY!!  |
 (419)-381-3601                  ------------------------------------------
 Bitnet: Ronau@mcoiarc          Or for the Vax (per anther list subscriber)
                                 Ctrl/Q,Ctrl/T,Ctrl/W,Ctrl/U,Ctrl/Z,Esc,
                                 Ctrl/C,Ctrl/Y/Y/Y,break,power off
From: Gary Gladstone (201)235-3875 <gladstog@rnprin.DNET.roche.com>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Pathworks vs Novell
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 12:04:40 EDT


I am writing a paper for upper management to discuss the differences between 
Novell and Pathworks. We currently have some users connected via Pathworks and 
there are several areas that have Novell networks (no netware). Specific items 
are advantages/disadvantages of one over the other, support in the VMS/DEC 
environment, features, administrative support, PC memory management, etc. If 
anyone has any written material that they would like to contribute, please 
forward to me directly. If there is interest, I will summarize my final report 
to the net.

Gary
 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Gary Gladstone                   Voice:    (201) 235-3875                 |
 | Senior Programmer/Analyst        FAX:      (201) 235-7605                 |
 | Hoffmann-La Roche                Internet: gladstog@rnisd0.dnet.roche.com |
 | 340 Kingsland St (bldg 85/3)               gladstone@eisner.decus.org     |
 | Nutley NJ 07110-1199                       73210.1762@compuserve.com      |
 +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+


Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
From: lloyd@jeeves.engr.mun.ca (Lloyd Little)
Subject: CDROM from ULTRIX server
Keywords: cdrom ultrix
Reply-To: lloyd@jeeves.engr.mun.ca
Organization: C-CAE, Memorial University of Newfoundland
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 12:30:23 GMT

Can someone tell me if I can mount an ISO9660 CDROM with DOS files on
it on an ULTRIX server and share it with Pathworks PCs?
I've rebuilt the kernel with cdfs support, mounted the disk (as both
uppercase and lowercase directory) and I can see the files in Ultrix.
However when I export it as a file service via pcsamgr, not all of the
files show up in the PCs directory. (None of the files show up with a 
lowercase directory...) Has anyone done this, and how was it done?

Lloyd
--
Lloyd Little		Programmer Consultant CCAE
			Memorial University of NFLD. Canada
			(709) 737-3108
lloyd@femto.engr.mun.ca
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Help needed for installing PATHWORKS for OS/2 on IBM OS/2 2.0
From: BING@VUCTRVAX.BITNET
Date: 07 Oct 1992 15:33:08 -0500
X-VMS-Cc: BING
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

        Hi, there,
                Could anyone please give me some help on the following
problem I have with PATHWORKS. I am trying to install PATHWORKS for OS/2
2.0A on a PS/2 70 machine with IBM OS/2 2.0. As the PATHWORKS for OS/2
documents states that it currently does not work with IBM OS/2 2.0 unless
you install IBM OS/2 LAN Server / LAN Requester. So I install the IBM LAN
server / requester first, then try to install the PATHWORKS for OS/2.
 
         But the setup program of PATHWORKS for OS/2 refused to install
the sofware. The error message I got is like that: "The current LAN Manager
is not detached, LAN Manager must be detached before updating or inssatlling.
To detach it, exit this setup program and the setup program that came with
your current LAN Manager, then choose the Detach Option...". All this infomation
is related to LAN Manager, and I just do not have any clue what I should do
correspondingly in the IBM LAN Server. I have tried all kinds of tricks to
do what the error message implied and have not gotten  any luck yet.
 
         I'll appreciate any help of yours. Thanks a lot in advance.
 
         Bingxue Xu
         Bing@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu
 
p.s.: It seems odd to have to install IBM OS/2 LAN Server / Requester in order
to install PATHWORKS. If anyone knows a better way to overcome the problem ,
that is, completely skip the IBM OS/2 LAN Server stuff, That would be great.
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE: Lost disk service
From: "(bachism)" <BACHISM@JHUDEV.DEV.JHU.EDU>
Date: 14 Oct 1992 08:09:59 -0400
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Vmsmail-To: SMTP%"LANWORKS%MIAMIU.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU"

Did you make sure LADDRV. was loaded in CONFIG.SYS????
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Pathworks and DR DOS
From: Alan Cantrell <CANTRELL@VUCTRVAX.BITNET>
Date: 15 Oct 1992 08:57:05 -0500
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

I seem to recall that someone on this list was having trouble getting
PW to run over DR DOS.  I am having trouble with this now.  The problem
is with the redirector.  Has anyone solved this?  Would you be willing
to share your experiences with me?
 
--Alan
 
cantrell@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu
CANTRELL@VUCTRVAX
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: subscription
From: Zsuzsanna Bencsath-Makkai <ZSUZSI@MEDCOR.MCGILL.CA>
Date: 14 Oct 1992 16:17:17 -0500
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

subscribe Zsuzsanna Bencsath-Makkai
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
From: jay@geohub.gcn.uoknor.edu (Jay A. Davis)
Subject: Re: PW4.1, UCX2.0
Originator: news@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 15:38:48 GMT
Reply-To: jay@geohub.gcn.uoknor.edu
Organization: Geosciences Computing Network, Univ. of Oklahoma

In article <LANWORKS%92100609525705@MIAMIU.ACS.MUOHIO.EDU>, CF0@PSUALT.BITNET (Craig Farrell)
writes:
|>Path:
|
constellation!convex!convex!darwin.sura.net!gatech!pitt.edu!drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs
s.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!husc-news.harvard.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!lanworks!list
|>From: CF0@PSUALT.BITNET (Craig Farrell)
|>Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
|>Subject: PW4.1, UCX2.0
>
|>We just recently installed UCX2.0 on our VAX.  This isn't directly
|>related to Pathworks. We can't get outgoing internet mail
|>working.  We can receive incoming mail but can only send to one
|>or two internet mail sites.  Other mail sits in que and doesn't
|>go anywhere.  Another site here at PSU has the same problem
|>and we have been talking to DEC but no solution has been found
|>yet.  I thought maybe someone using UCX with Pathworks might
|>have run into the same problem.  We think we have UCX set right
|>for mail.  We don't have any MX records set up.  We thought the
|>nameserver should be able to resolve the receiving location.
|> 
|>       Craig Farrell                       Penn State Altoona Campus
|>       CF0@PSUALT.bitnet                   225 CLRC Building
|>       (814) 949-5295                      Altoona PA,  16601
|>
Your right this is not a pathworks problem.  There is a UCX group.  Anyway.
call CSC and get a patch.  There are some MAJOR problems with
the release on condist, hkits and tape with UCX 2.0.  I started w/
field test 1 2 3 and the distributions from DEC.  HA!  I have put three
different patches on for smtp ftp and telnet.  I have an access violation
I have yet to get a patch for for SMTP.  I imagein you are not pointing 
your  alternate gateway at your nameserver.  Do a UCX sho config smtp.
Check the execution queues and make sure the process SMTP_decnetname_##
process is not burning 20 - 30 percent of your cpu.  This is a big bug.
What it is doing is running wild asking your nameserver where the address is.
Like 30 or 40 times a second!  This is NOT nice to the nameserver.
I could go on.

Jay Davis
University of Oklahoma
Manager, Networking and Operations.
(405) - 325 - 5540
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Lost disk service
From: N Werner Mortensen <WERNER@MFC.PANUM.KU.DK>
Date: 13 Oct 1992 23:46:00 +0100
X-VMS-Cc: WERNER
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Hello fellow PathWorkers,
 
We use a VAX3900 as the PathWorks V4.1-1 server and DOS PathWorks V4.1 Clients.
Recently I received an upgrade from DEC named PathWorks for DOS V4.1.A which
turned out to be mostly token-ring stuff but still there were a few fixes for
other problems.
Now, after performing the install, the release notes instructs you to run the
NETSETU on the client in order to use the new features in V4.1A
 
We ran NETSETU on two PCs and after that they are unable to connect to any of
our 8 disk services !!!   At first we believed that the disk server had crashed,
but the remaining 50 PCs connected all right to all 8 disk services.
 
 
What have we checked so far:
 
There is not a single clue in the various PCFS$LOG_FILES
 
When we issue the command:  "USE \\server /v"  each of the two PCs shows that
all 8 disk services ARE available !!!
 
The two PCs connect allright to the system file service PCSAV41
 
When we issue the command "USE G: DISK_SERVICE_NAME" the response is short and
simple:   Error: Service not available
 
We also tried with the command "USE ?: DISK_SERVICE_NAME" which gave us the
same response.
 
This really doesn't make any sense as the guy at the PC next to you are using
the same disk services at full speed.
 
 
Has anyone upgraded to PathWorks for DOS V4.1A and gotten away with it ?
 
Any clues, suggestions or solutions ?    Anything will be appreciated.
 
Regards,
**************************************************************************
*  N. Werner Mortensen		Phone:    +45 3135 7900  ext 2530	 *
*  Network Manager		Fax:      +45 3135 7657			 *
*  The Faculty of Medicine	Home:     +45 3174 9212			 *
*  University of Copenhagen						 *
*  Blegdamsvej 3		Internet: werner@mfc.panum.ku.dk	 *
*  DK-2200 Copenhagen N		X.25:     238301043056::werner (DEC PSI) *
*  Denmark			DECnet	  52482::werner			 *
**************************************************************************
From: d_tindall@LUKE.SPU.EDU (Dave Tindall - Seattle Pacific University)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Help with MS Mail 3.0 & Pathworks
Date: 9 Oct 92 14:29:19 GMT
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Hey netters,
 
I'm trying to implement Microsoft Mail 3.0 on a Pathworks network.
 
Here's the details --
 
	*MS Mail 3.0 (15 clients) with SMTP Interface
	*Pathworks 4.1
	*Windows 3.1 on all clients (at least so far..)
 
Can anybody help with some of the implementation details that neither
Digital or Microsoft have been able to address.
 
1. How is security of MS Mail executables and actual mail files handled
	by Pathworks. It looks like everyone needs read/write to all
	postoffice files.
 
2. How to configure the SMTP gateway. Do we really have to run it on a
	stand alone PC (which also connects to pathworks)?
 
3. How do I connect MS Mail to VAX VMS Mail?
 
4. Do you need to run TCP/IP (instead of DECnet) on the
	SMTP gateway?
	Other Mail clients?
 
If anybody out there has got this product working for them I'd love to hear
about it.
 
Dave Tindall
Seattle Pacific University
Computer & Information Systems
206-281-2239
d_tindall@luke.spu.edu
From: ERMIMWEI@er.ele.tue.nl (Wim Beckers)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: mailchk
Date: 16 Oct 92 16:10:50 GMT
Organization: Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands


Mailchk doesn't have an internal help function nor can I find information
in the documentation.

Is it possible to use mailchk without mail.ini?

p.e.  I would like to check for mail on an other server as which
      is in mail.ini.
      mailchk \\node\user password 


thanks in advance

Wim Beckers
----------------------------------$$$$$-------------------------------- 
 Measurement and Control Group              P.O. BOX 513                
 Department of Electrical Engineering       5600 MB  Eindhoven       
 Eindhoven University of Technology         The Netherlands             
 .                                                                      
 Email      : ERMIMWEI@er.ele.tue.nl                                  
 TELEFAX    : +31.40.434582                                             
 TEL        : +31.40.472300 (secr.)                                     
            : +31.40.473246 (office)
From: MIS5000@UMBCADMN.BITNET (Themistoklis I. Pentakalos)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Fast NICs for fast PCs....on Pathworks.
Date: 7 Oct 92 13:23:00 GMT
X-VMS-Cc: MIS5000
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Hi there everyone,
 
        Can you all give some comments on selecting fast ethernet cards
for use with 486s on Pathworks?
 
        Thanks,
 
        Themos
 
P.S.    Have you all heard that some research group in Holland
        found a secret security problem with Novell's network just
        recently? Supposedly, it's a rather big security gap and
        Novell people are very concerned!
 
        DRINKS FOR EVERYONE..... ON ME.....
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Subscribe
From: J.Slee@OPEN.AC.UK
Date: 12 Oct 1992 09:04:38 +0100
X-VMS-Cc: J_SLEE
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Via:      UK.AC.OPEN; 12 OCT 92  9:14:22 BST

Subscribe Jamie Slee
 
How do I subscribe to this list ??
From: anos@elmrd6.ineab.ikea.se
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Problem w long filenames
Date: 7 Oct 92 09:06:16 GMT
Organization: IKEA Northern Europe AB


Hi there !

Does anyone have a solution to the LONG-FILENAME-PROBLEM during file
transfers from VMS-mounted disk to PC diskette.

If you have a file named A_VERY_LONG_FILENAME.SPECIAL on your Vax,
created by WP (?), then trying to access this file from the DOS prompt
will fail. You don't even see it in the DIR listing...

What to do (besides renaming it to A.WP). We have over 1000 files on
a documentation disk that should be moved to local harddisks...

Anders Ostling IKEA NORTHERN EUROPE AB

Mail to: anos@elmrd6.ineab.ikea.se
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
From: karcher@jevex.waisman.wisc.edu
Subject: RE: PATHWORKS for VMS 4.1-1 vs 4.1C
Organization: Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Date: 9 OCT 92 19:29:50 CDT

In a previous article, rempel@hg.uleth.ca (Curtis Rempel) wrote:
> 
>I noticed on the September CONDIST that there is  PATHWORKS FOR VMS 4.1-1 and
>also 4.1C.  Without having to unpack both of them, does anybody know what the
>difference is?  Which is the latest? I would guess 4.1-1 would be the latest??

I believe V4.1-1 is later but V4.1-1A is latest. V4.1-1A is known as CSCPAT
#3055 and is available from DSNlink. We had been running 4.1C without problems.


Carl Karcher                          Internet: KARCHER@WAISMAN.WISC.EDU
Waisman Center                        Bitnet:   KARCHER@WISCMACC
University of Wisconsin-Madison       PSTnet:   (608) 263-5896
From: dv@LUKE.SPU.EDU (Dennis Vanlandingham)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Microsoft Mail 3.0 and PathWorks 4.1
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:37:28 GMT
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

My supervisor (David Tindill) posted a message concerning these two
products and how to make them work together.  Here are the specifics
on what I have tried so far.
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I installed mail on an application file service as a single postoffice.
Everyone I gave READ/WRITE/CREATE or READ/WRITE access to the service
will have the ability to delete ALL files on the service.  If I create
a common file service, then I have to manage the ACLs on each file
for each person. :-(
 
Eventually we want to access VAX/VMS mail (for users who only have a
dumb terminal) and internet mail (being accessed now from VAX/VMS mail
using MX).
 
My question is whether or not anyone has any experience with a similar
configuration, and would like to share their knowledge.  I have talked to
Microsoft and DEC, without too much luck.  If you can, please help.
 
We are also looking into using Microsoft's Gateway to SMTP for our Internet
access.
 
/*
 
          In real life:    Dennis Vanlandingham
                Campus:    Seattle Pacific University
       Internet E-Mail:    dv@luke.spu.edu
          Voice/V-Mail:    (206)-281-2430
                   FAX:    (206)-281-2850
 
*/
 
 
 
 
----- End forwarded message
From: BETH@VSCNET.BITNET (Beth Stranahan, Office of Computing Services)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Hiding Print and File Services
Date: 13 Oct 92 19:02:00 GMT
X-VMS-Cc: beth
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

We would like to restrict access to certain print services and file services.
As it happens, these print services and file services are in a particular zone
so the solution that comes to mind is to hide the zone.
 
Is anyone aware of a VAX/VMS-based or Mac-based utility that would do this for
us? Or, is there another solution other than hiding the zone which we should be
aware of?
 
Thanks in advance.
 
Beth Stranahan
beth@vscnet
From: GRAEME@GRIFFITH.DWR.CSIRO.AU (GRAEME SHELL)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: VAX/VMS F11CD to access PC CDROM's
Date: 7 Oct 92 16:56:00 GMT
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

I have just reconnected to the list after being off for 3 months, so pardon
me if this has already been dealt with.
 
Has anyone used VMS F11CD with VMS 5.5 and pathworks 4.1-1 to access and use
PC CD-ROM's (eg Corel Draw and other distribution media).
 
I have the file service working ok on a DEC sampler CD-rom, and am planning
to upgrade to vms 5.5 and buy F11CD soon.  I would like to know if there are
any traps or whether it will be smooth sailing.
 
Thanks in advance
 
Graeme Shell
CSIRO GRIFFITH AUSTRALIA
graeme@griffith.dwr.csiro.au
From: jasper@vax.path.ox.ac.uk
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Re: VAX/VMS F11CD to access PC CDROM's
Date: 12 Oct 92 17:29:33 GMT
Organization: Oxford University Molecular Biology Data Centre
Nntp-Posting-User: rpgrant

In article <199210070156.AA10713@shark.mel.dit.csiro.au>, GRAEME@GRIFFITH.DWR.CSIRO.AU (GRAEME SHELL) writes:
> I have just reconnected to the list after being off for 3 months, so pardon
> me if this has already been dealt with.
>  
> Has anyone used VMS F11CD with VMS 5.5 and pathworks 4.1-1 to access and use
> PC CD-ROM's (eg Corel Draw and other distribution media).
>  
> I have the file service working ok on a DEC sampler CD-rom, and am planning
> to upgrade to vms 5.5 and buy F11CD soon.  I would like to know if there are
> any traps or whether it will be smooth sailing.

As it stands the first problem that we have seen is that it only can mount one
ISO-9660 CD, dismount it and you can remomunt it, but try to dismount the
first one and mount a different one using either /system or /share you get an
error indicating unreleased file locks. (Can't trrack down the exact error at
this moment, if anyone with influence, power or access to the sources wants
the info I'll reproduce it :) This is from a RRD-42 direct from the cluster,
not via and InfoServer. 

Will this be a problem to you? Well depends on how you plan to use it I guess, 
if we are content with just one CD it's quite nice (Ie it works), but since I 
would like to read the other CD's I have, and I don't really want to keep 
rebooting the cluster... It is a pain. But I guess it will get fixed sooner or 
later (yes it has been forwarded to DEC I believe)

> Graeme Shell
> CSIRO GRIFFITH AUSTRALIA
> graeme@griffith.dwr.csiro.au

regards,   jasper

Jasper Rees
Oxford Univeristy Molecular Biology Data Centre
Sir William Dunn School of Pathology
Oxford University

jasper@vax.path.ox.ac.uk
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: <None>
From: mgilbert@FIRST.ETC.BC.CA
Date: 14 Oct 1992 00:35:32 -0700
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

lists
============================================
Mike Gilbert
    Technology Co-ordinator, School District #81
    Fort Nelson,  B.C.   V0C 1R0
    CANADA
    Voice: 604.774.6958     Fax:   604.774.6960
InterNet: mgilbert@first.etc.bc.ca
 ============================================
    A Proud Participant In B.C.'s
    *NORTHERN DISTANCE LEARNING PROJECT*
============================================
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE: Pathworks vs Novell
From: "(NETWORK MANAGER--3-6759)" <BRUCE@GENEVA.STANFORD.EDU>
Date: 12 Oct 1992 15:26:44 -0700
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Vmsmail-To: SMTP%"LANWORKS%MIAMIU.BITNET@Forsythe.Stanford.EDU"

Gary ...
 
I would be interested in a copy summary of your report...
 
thanx...
 
bruce.....ma.bxm@forsythe.stanford.edu