HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: spencer@panix.com (David Spencer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: TeX -> ASCII
Date: 20 Aug 92 12:04:23 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC

George Jetson <pynq@midway.uchicago.edu> writes:

>So, I ftp'd to the indicated place, got GNUINFO.ZOO, and extracted
>MAKEINFO.EXE (from the OUT directory in the ZOO) and ran it on my DOS
>machine and got:

> <1> (E:\) makeinfo gcc.tex
> Making info file `gcc.info' from `gcc.tex'.
> gcc.info: No such file or directory

Just a WAG: DOS only allows a 3 letter filename extension. When
makeinfo tries to make gcc.info, it makes gcc.inf.

dhs      spencer@panix.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons)
Subject: Re: Mac version of 386BSD??
Organization: Industrial Technology Institute
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 14:20:48 GMT

niko@iastate.edu (Nikolaus E Schuessler) writes:

>Q:
>   1) Where would I get 4.4BSD? (site, directory)

I believe that only the alpha release is out and only to selected
sites.

>   2) What R the chances of me getting my rump sued?

You personally?  Depends on the answer to #3.  Assuming you do not
have a licence, you're reasonably safe at the moment.  If USL wins
against BSDI/UCB, expect to be sued.

>   3) Do I need some sorta license ?

Depends on who you ask.  UCB says no, USL says yes.

>   4) Is there enough interest?

Not from me.  Now, if you were going to put it on a Sun . . .
-- 
"If life were fair, the acquisition of a large bosom or a massive inheritance
 would have no bearing on your ability to attract the opposite sex, and Dan
 Quayle would be making a living asking runny-nosed children, `Do you want
 fries with that?'"     -- John Cleese, "Corporate Computing" magazine
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: bad@flatlin.ka.sub.org (Christoph Badura)
Subject: Re: Adaptec 1542A vs 1542B
Organization: Guru Systems/Funware Department
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 21:09:42 GMT
Keywords: Adaptec SCSI

In <1992Aug11.231903.11908@ultb.isc.rit.edu> asd1466@ultb.isc.rit.edu (A.S. Dumas) writes:

>What's the difference between the 1542A and 1542B?

The 1542B is newer, uses more custom chips and has additional
functionality in the firmware.

>Do both work with 386BSD?

The 1542A presently doesn't work with 386BSD. A couple of people are
working on it.
-- 
				Christoph Badura  ---  bad@flatlin.ka.sub.org

ISO? Nicht immer, aber immer M-vfter.
From: juengst@boss1.physik.uni-bonn.de (Henry G. Juengst)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: how to shutdown -todos?
Keywords: shutdown, booting
Date: 19 Aug 92 13:06:22 GMT
Organization: Universit"at Bonn, Informatikinstitut, R"omerstr 154, W-5300 Bonn 1

In article <22231@venera.isi.edu>, allard@isi.edu (Dennis Allard) writes:
> I notice two shutdown programs.
> /usr/distbin/shutdown and /sbin/shutdown.

BTW is it correct to have shutdown (or any other program you need to
shutdown or to stay in single user mode) in a subdirectory of /usr if
these directories are not part of the root partition ? I don't think so.

I moved elvis into the root partition, too. When your system can't
mount /usr (because it's normally mounted via nfs, for example) you
will know why I did so. :-)

Henry

> [...] deleted

> 
> Dennis G. Allard
> internet: allard@isi.edu
> tel: 310-399-4740

-- 
juengst@boss1.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.221.30]
juengst@saph2.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.221.12]
juengst@pib1.physik.uni-bonn.de  [131.220.221.2] (strange particle)

I'm only speaking for myself, but not for anybody else !
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: selling 386BSD (was Re: 386BSD on CD-ROM?)
Organization: Taronga Park BBS
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 01:58:31 GMT

In article <1561@hcshh.hcs.de> hm@hcshh.hcs.de (Hellmuth Michaelis) writes:
>but, what can be done to stop those money-makers from selling something which
>ought to be free, and give people who just want to USE it, the chance of
>getting/using/modifying/etc. it in whatever way they like ?

Competition. Get to their customers first... how can they sell a commercial
version to someone who already has the free one? That way, they need to add
value, and we all win.
-- 
                                                                `-_-'
                         Have you hugged your wolf today?        'U`

Peter da Silva, Taronga Park BBS, Houston, TX  +1 713 568 0480/1032
From: grog@adagio.UUCP (Greg Lehey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: UNIGRAM's article on the USL-BSDI suit
Date: 12 Aug 92 13:12:25 GMT
Organization: LEMIS, Schellnhausen 2, W-6324 Feldatal, Germany

In article <1992Aug1.071226@eklektix.com> rcd@raven.eklektix.com (Dick Dunn) writes:
>Thanks to Tom Limoncelli for posting parts of that Unigram-X article.  I
>was able to make the connection to having seen a sample copy of it at a
>Uniforum a couple years ago--is it still printed on yellow paper?? :-)

Well, it's a sort of dull off-yellow. Compugram is bright yellow.

>Now and then I've wondered what would be the trade-press equivalent of the
>US's "National Enquirer"...wish I'd known it was there all along...

In fact, on the whole both it and its sister Compugram (daily) are not
bad publications. Note that they are very timely: they were the first
people to report this stuff (this wasn't the first time they mentioned
it - I found out about the suit from Unigram-X, not from the net).

I have learnt to skip Maureen O'Gara's viewpoint of the world a long
time ago, but maybe she's not alone in her views. After all, she's
been working for both publications for at least a couple of years. It
would be short-sighted to think everybody thinks the way we do, and
maybe this viewpoint is just a rather extreme complement of what the
average hacker thinks of `suits'.
-- 
Greg Lehey                       | Tel: +49-6637-1488              
LEMIS                            | Fax: +49-6637-1489
Schellnhausen 2, W-6324 Feldatal, Germany
*** NOTE ***: Headers are mangled - reply to grog%lemis@Germany.EU.net
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Othman Ahmad)
Subject: Re: Is it possible?
Organization: Nanyang Technological University - Singapore
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 17:28:50 GMT

jamie@speedy.acns.nwu.edu (James R. Groves) writes:
: I have a 42.9 meg st250R and I would love to be able to install completely
Convert bin01 into multi-volume tar format like the old 0.0
	0.0 comes with mr which is like dd but propmts for a key press
if the volume is exhausted. I'm trying to locate the source for mr in my
0.0 but without success. It should be possible to write a script.
	Another possiblility is to modify mread to output to stdout.

--
Othman bin Ahmad, School of EEE,
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 2263.
Internet Email: eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg
Bitnet Email: eoahmad@ntuvax.bitnet
From: phr@soda.berkeley.edu (Paul Rubin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: Restrictions on 'free' UNIX / 386BSD (Re: selling 386BSD)
Date: 17 Aug 92 19:59:02
Organization: CSUA/UCB
	<63DILTJ@taronga.com> <PHR.92Aug15214245@soda.berkeley.edu>
	<22221@venera.isi.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: allard@isi.edu's message of 17 Aug 92 22:05:34 GMT

    True, we don't see examples of shrinkwrapped copylefted stuff at
    the software houses.  Maybe a publisher should give it a try!

Yes, we do.  See the ads in BYTE and other places from the Austin
Code Works, for example.  Also, Cygnus has discussed doing a retail
version of GCC like this.  There are quite a few duplication joints
(floppy and cd-rom) which ship copylefted stuff alongside shareware,
but with no support; maybe that's not what you mean.  But there are
plans afoot to do what you describe, now that you can run most progs
on mass-market hardware.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
Subject: Re: Naive "imake" questions
Organization: Weber State University  (Ogden, UT)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 92 21:33:13 GMT

In article <1992Aug16.160342.11490@NeoSoft.com> karl@NeoSoft.com (Karl Lehenbauer) writes:
>OK, lots of X programs come with Imakefiles and need imake to generate
>a customized Makefile for the local machine.
>
>Firing up imake as distributed in X386 for 386BSD, it complains about
>not being about to find "Imake.tmpl".  I found that setting the env
>var IMAKEINCLUDE to "-I/usr/lib/X11/config" would get it to create
>makefiles OK, but not with quite the correct information to build
>the target, like library paths are wrong.
>
>Is there another place this is supposed to point to, to get to the right
>stuff?  If not, is there a copy or link that needs to be done?  Otherwise,
>what is the accepted way to set this up?

	The imake program uses a relative path (relative to TOP) to get
locations of everything.  The Makefile resulting from the imake is supposed
to know this for the invocation of imake for subsequent make files under
the creation heirarchy.

	There is a shell script called "xmkmf" (X make make file) available
(hit archie if it isn't in your X distribution).  Basically, it uses the
path-to-top specification option to imake.

	To use it, you can do one of two things:  Edit 'xmkmf' so that
it knows where TOP is (this is the directory which contains the 'config'
directory which contains imake), and use the following command from within
a directory containing an Imakefile you wish to become a makefile:

	xmkmf

-OR- you can specify that top level directory as a parameter.  For instance,
if your top level X heirarchy directory was "/X11R5/new/dist" and your
config directory was therefore "/X11R5/new/dist/config", the following
command would work with an uneditied xmkmf in the Imakefile directory:

	xmkmf /X11R5/new/dist/config

If you use the second method, you should probably be aware that it seems
to hate relative paths:  if you relocate your build directory relative to
the TOP directory, you will need to remake xmkmf.  If you use an absolute
path, as long as TOP doesn't move, you can move around the actual build
directory for what you are building, without adverse effect.  For instance,
I usually build new X apps in my home directory and test them out before
relocating them into my X heirarchy and building them there.


					Terry Lambert
					terry_lambert@gateway.novell.com
					terry@icarus.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       terry@icarus.weber.edu
 "I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: veit@du9ds3.uni-duisburg.de (Holger Veit)
Subject: Re: resize swap space?
Date: 17 Aug 92 14:47:07 GMT
Reply-To: veit@du9ds3.uni-duisburg.de
Organization: Uni-Duisburg FB9 Datenverarbeitung

In <92230.085004NXS10@psuvm.psu.edu> <NXS10@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>I installed 386bsd on my pc.Now I want to run xwindows on that.How to change sw
>ap space now when I have the complete system loaded?I have tiny boot flopy,fixi
>t floppy &bin01.**.
>thanks.Neena

Sorry, not much chance for now. You have to give up your BSD partitions to
make room for the swap space, unless
- you have a second drive (and the 2-drive patches for the kernel) which
  you can use for swapping, or
- you have empty space after the BSD -A5- partition on the disk, which you
  can extend (the swap area is at the end after install).

But a question for all the other wizard's:

SunOS has the facility to enable swapping on a contiguous file by 
"swapon file" (even on a file mounted by NFS). Could it be possible to
add such a facility to 386bsd without big problems? Regarding the 5MB install
problem and the general wish to drop the overall performance of the system by
X11 ;-) something like this seems to be necessary.

Holger

-- 
|  |   / Holger Veit             | INTERNET: veit@du9ds3.uni-duisburg.de
|__|  /  University of Duisburg  | BITNET: veit%du9ds3.uni-duisburg.de@UNIDO
|  | /   Dept. of Electr. Eng.   | "No, my programs are not BUGGY, these are
|  |/    Inst. f. Dataprocessing |          just unexpected FEATURES"
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: niko@iastate.edu (Nikolaus E Schuessler)
Subject: Re: 680x0 version of 386BSD?? [Was: Re: Mac version of 386BSD??]
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 13:47:36 GMT

In article <1992Aug19.093937.14857@olymp.informatik.uni-bonn.de> volker@sfb256.iam.uni-bonn.de ( Volker A. Brandt ) writes:
>In article <1992Aug18.174205.23671@news.iastate.edu> niko@iastate.edu (Nikolaus E Schuessler) writes:
>
>Right, that's what I thought too.  It's just that the project is too big for
>me to do alone.
>

Well I agree with you there... the first few steps would have to be platform
specific anyway... floppy drivers, video drivers and a minimum kernel...

Think we could require 68030 or better for openers?

I was thinking development using gcc...

-- 
Niko Schuessler               
Project Vincent Systems Manager              email: niko@iastate.edu
Iowa State University Computation Center     voice: (515) 294-1672
Ames IA 50010                                snail: 272 Durham
From: bri@pegasus.mit.edu (Brian D. Carlstrom)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: 680x0 version of 386BSD?? [Was: Re: Mac version of 386BSD??]
Date: 18 Aug 92 17:22:52 GMT
Organization: mit

>I would like to generalize the question:  Is anyone out there seriously
>thinking about porting 386BSD to a Motorola platform?
people have asked this before, specifically about porting it to the apollo
680x0 platform. this is something i am interested in, but right now most
of my time is taken up by trying to explore 386bsd. maybe once 386bsd is
cleaned up a bit, then you can seriously talk about porting.

-bri
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.amiga
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: 680x0 version of 386BSD?? [Was: Re: Mac version of 386BSD??]
Organization: Taronga Park BBS
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 13:23:49 GMT

In article <1992Aug19.222443.13741@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> tom@afthree.as.arizona.edu (Thomas J. Trebisky) writes:
>There are a number of things to think about.  First is the target system.

How about the Amiga 3000, and other '030 Amigas. There are some really
cheap '030 cards for the Amiga 500 and there are about 3 million of them
out there...

Plus, they come with schematics and the hardware is really well documented.
And there's GCC for AmigaOS, and the RDB mechanism handles partitioning
nicely. You could even use Amiga UNIX for cross development.

And they read/write standard PC-format disks if you want to give up some
disk space. Good SCSI. High performance bus.
-- 
                                                                `-_-'
                         Have you hugged your wolf today?        'U`

Peter da Silva, Taronga Park BBS, Houston, TX  +1 713 568 0480/1032
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: bambi@bu.oz.au (David J. Hughes)
Subject: Re: Problem with WD8003-Card in BSD386
Organization: ITS, Bond University
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 04:12:33 GMT

peter@panther.cosy.sbg.ac.at (Peter Burgstaller) writes:

>I can't set the jumpers on my ethernet-card to irq 2, the only settings
>my card accepts is irq 3 or irq 5.


The vast majority of WD cards allow software configuration.  Check for a
jumper marked "Soft".  If you have the WD Drivers disk that came with
the card you can try to check that things are working by setting the
values and then running test.  It'll soon tell you if the software
configuration has worked.


bambi
   ___                                 David J. Hughes     bambi@bu.oz.au
  /   \                /  /    /        
 /  __/ __   __   ____/  /    / __          Senior Network Programmer
/    \ /  \ /  \ /   /  /    / /  \  /    Comms Development & Operation
\____/ \__//   / \__/   \___/ /   / /       AUSTRALIA  (+61 75 951450)
From: STDN%MARIST@VM.MARIST.EDU (Dan Newcombe)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: How to print to my printer?
Date: 12 Aug 1992 16:24:05 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

I have a Panasonic 9-pin printer hooked up to LPT1:

I tried using lpr to print to it and it went on about
a device not being there.  What do I need to do to
be able to print to my printer?

Thanks,
  -Dan
STDN@VM.MARIST.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: pk@cs.few.eur.nl (Paul Kranenburg)
Subject: Re: filesystem dissapears
Reply-To: pk@cs.eur.nl
Organization: Erasmus University Rotterdam
Distribution: comp
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 09:16:12 GMT

In <1992Aug21.172156.18879@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes:

>In article <GEORGE.92Aug21065529@gloria.csi.compuserve.com> gjones@csi.CompuServe.com writes:
>[ ... File system disappears ... ]

>It's in the FAQ.  Just type ^C and it'll come back.  Switch to csh (or
>anything other than sh) for a permanent fix.

Avoid longjump'ing out of the routine `getpwd()' in src/bin/sh/cd.c (in case
an error occurrs).  The following patch works for me.

*** /tmp/da02995        Sat Aug 22 11:15:35 1992
--- cd.c        Sat Aug 22 10:54:25 1992
***************
*** 347,353 ****
                        close(pip[1]);
                }
                execl("/bin/pwd", "pwd", (char *)0);
!               error("Cannot exec /bin/pwd");
        }
        close(pip[1]);
        pip[1] = -1;
--- 347,355 ----
                        close(pip[1]);
                }
                execl("/bin/pwd", "pwd", (char *)0);
!               out2str("Cannot exec /bin/pwd\n");
!               flushall();
!               _exit(1);
        }
        close(pip[1]);
        pip[1] = -1;

--------------------

-pk
From: dpassage@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David Paschich)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: Mac version of 386BSD??
Date: 17 Aug 92 21:41:05 GMT
	<1992Aug17.215858.14408@news.iastate.edu>
Organization: Computer Scientists Against the Oppression of Crutons
NNTP-Posting-Host: eden.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: niko@iastate.edu's message of Mon, 17 Aug 1992 21:58:58 GMT

In article <1992Aug17.215858.14408@news.iastate.edu> niko@iastate.edu (Nikolaus E Schuessler) writes:

   In article <1992Aug17.213706.10326@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> minh@inst-sun1.jpl.nasa.gov (Minh Lang) writes:
   >Is there any Mac version of 386bsd (or something similar that runs on the
   >Mac)? I would appreciate any info/comments. Thank you.
   >

   I was seriously thinking of porting it... I however have a 40M hard drive
   :-(

You'd be better to start off with 4.4BSD Lite, since that will at
least have 680x0 support in it.

Of course, 4.4BSD might get shot.

David Paschich
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: paigen@tfs.com (David Paigen)
Subject: Anyone using a wengtek tape drive with 386BSD?
Keywords: wengtek 386 bsd 386bsd
Organization: TRW Financial Systems
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 02:08:12 GMT

I have been having trouble getting dist.fs to recognize my tape
drive.  SCO Unix sees it, I managed to mess with the jumpers on
the controller board (also wangtek) to fix the memory io to 0x330.

However, 386BSD says nothing about it during boot.

If anyone has one out there, would you please check to see how the
jumpers and switches are set on your controller board?

(This is not a SCSI tape, it uses a QIC-36 interface board)

----------------------->"Lay on, McDuff,    14th c. ideals in a 21st c. world
David Paigen            and damn'd be he        N: PLO Bush IRA CIA KKK
TRW Financial Systems   who first cries,        S: terrorism pipe bomb kill
paigen@tfs.com          'hold, enough!'"        A: assasination maim
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: ggr@koonda.acci.com.au (Greg Rose)
Subject: Re: re_comp/exec() ?
Organization: Australian Computing and Communications Institute
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 23:42:37 GMT

In article <1992Aug20.082255.7855@rtf.bt.co.uk> duplain@rtf.bt.co.uk (Andy Duplain) writes:
>In article <1992Aug19.170703.6627@news.uit.no> thostr@stud.cs.uit.no (Thomas Strandenaes) writes:
>>I can't find the re_comp/re_exec system-calls. I need these to
>>compile some of the source in /usr/othersrc. Can anyone give
>>a helping hand here?
>
>	Try regcomp(), regexec() and regsub() courtesy Harry Spencer of
                                                       ^^^^^
It wasn't Harry, it was his famous brother Herb.

Sorry Henry :-)
--
Greg Rose                 Australian Computing and Communications Institute
ggr@acci.com.au                                              +61 3 282 2532
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: 386bsd 2nd disk confusion?
From: eje@irenaeus.mlo.dec.com (Eric James Ewanco)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 19:54:35 GMT
Reply-To: ewanco@kalvin.enet.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


Hi. Me again.  I read here something about requiring a patched kernel to use a
second disk.  Lucky for me, in my rebellion of youth, I tried it anyway. It
worked perfectly.  I even figured out how to use disklabel (write me for
details if anyone wants to know).  I disklabelled it, newfs-ed, and put it in
my /etc/fstab.  works great.  It should be noted that it is a SCSI drive, but
driven by the BIOS.

I'm confused -- what's the two-disk patch for?

--
/=============================================================================\
| Eric Ewanco - Software Engineer     For the rash and outrageous opinions ex-|
| Digital Equipment Corp, Maynard MA  pressed herein I alone am responsible;  |
| ewanco@kalvin.enet.dec.com          they do not belong to DIGITAL(TM).      |
\==============================- 2 Th 2:15 -==================================/

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: tvf@cci632.cci.com (Tom Frauenhofer)
Subject: Re: Why the big copyright statements?
Organization: Northern Telecom, Network Applications Systems, Rochester, NY
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 20:23:17 GMT

In article <1992Aug15.001820.2374@rwwa.COM> witr@rwwa.com writes:
>In article <14809@ksr.com>, jfw@ksr.com (John F. Woods) writes:
>| The problem is that the law basically *requires* that the copyright get in your
>| face.
>| 

... deleted some stuff ...

>
>Also, my studies indicate that a *one line* copyright notice, placed
>prominently on each copy, would suffice to protect the work (in the US)
>as long as it contains:
>
>  1) The symbol <c inside circle>, the word ``Copyright'' or the
>     abbreviation ``Copr.''

Technically, the symbol <c inside circle> is not a legal replacement for the
word ``Copyright''  (Yes, I check with a lawyer friend on this one a couple
of years ago).
--
Thomas V. Frauenhofer, WA2YYW, tvf@cci.com, ...!uunet!uupsi!cci632!tvf
Mandlebratwurst: The Meal that Eats Itself!
From: lape@me.chalmers.se (Lars Persson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: 386BSD and INGRES89?
Date: 23 Aug 92 07:17:46 GMT

Hi Netland!
I am tinkering a little with INGRES89 on my 386BSD machine.
I picked up the distribution on GATEKEEPER and there are only two CPU
types in the Makefile (./source/conf/Makefile), namely SUN and VAX. I
put the dial on VAX and it ALMOST works. The compiler chews code a long 
while until this piece of directive comes into view: 

as -0 bmove.VAX.o bmove.VAX.s

You get an error 0 but the make continues down the code. I broke here but a 
collegue had more patience (i.e. faster machine) and he found four or more 
places where the compilers spits and sputter. But it is an ALMOST go! Now 
wouldn't it be nice to have a 4GL language to this little babe?
Has anyone succeeded out there? If so, what has to be done?

/L. Persson, Harlosa PD computer center, Sweden

           /*(ANY NOUN)-ware should be free as air.*/
From: yas@hpycla.kobe.hp.com (Yasuyuki Suzuki)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 07:12:31 GMT
Subject: Re: Endless boot cycle- suggestions?
Organization: HP Kobe Systems Operation, Kobe, Japan