HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Who was the Traitor?
Date: 15 Sep 92 16:44:39 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

sbourgeo@pinocchio.Berkeley.EDU (Stephen Bourgeois) writes:

>In article <1992Sep14.135449.1@gallua.gallaudet.edu>,
>12mwingfield@gallua.gallaudet.edu writes:
>> AS of Wizard #14, there was a theroy that Bishop might be the one who the
>> traitor, since he has a different perspective and philosophy of
>handling those
>> who broke Golden Age law.  Since, he is here with the current X-Men,
>he find it
>> frustrating to apply his philosophy to his tactics of  battling, he might be
>> the one who decides that the X-Men should have a martyr, so he might
>be the one
>> who kills off Prof. X.  That might be a th

>What about the fact that Bishop never heard of himself mentioned in the past
>while he was being taught XSE doctrine?

Maybe he's from an *alternate* future.

				James Willer
{the opinions above are probably NOT those of
 anyone at all}
From: morpheus@cco.caltech.edu (Ken Bartlett)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Claremont
Date: 9 Sep 92 19:15:13 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

In article <8efHw=G00iUx08_L5U@andrew.cmu.edu> mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael J. Keating) writes:
>Funny, all these years I though that Chris Claremont was a woman!  Are
>you sure that he(she's) not?

"Why couldn't this [comic creator] be a woman?"

No, CC is male.

					--Me
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: Re: Cable is Nathan Summers?
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 21:13:47 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.042927.26802@njitgw.njit.edu> bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler) writes:
>In article <79769@ut-emx.uucp> nova@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jennifer Baughman) writes:
>>Cable as Douglock???  I thought they handled the whole Doug Ramsey/Warlock 
>>clone situation in X-Force Annual #1....
>>
>>Besides, if he were, I think they would have shown him shape-shifting.  Plus,
>>neither Doug Ramsey or Warlock had telekinetic powers.
>
>Of course, neither did Nathan Summers.
>
Of course he did.  He could make TK bubbles.  Claremont said so!

---SCAVENGER

-- 
KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Why Claremont Left (was Re: Fwd: Rachel)
Date: 8 Sep 92 20:49:20 GMT
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder

In article <Bu96JB.4vG@dei.unipd.it> elf@sabrina.dei.unipd.it (Paolo Fornasiero 273503/IL) writes:

>Finally I have a question on X-MEN.
>What's the real reason for the Chris Claremont leaving?
>Thanx for reading.
>				Paolo 
>
There are several stories behind the reason.  But in all of them the finger 
points to Bob "I can f**k up a book worse than Lobdell" Harris(y'know, no matter
 how much I write that, it still rings true)

Harris thought it would be a godd idea to play Jim Lee against Chris.  This went
into changing the stories to fit the art, etc.  With the story arc for the new
series, Claremont had planned to have Xavier loose his powers NOT become 
crippiled again.  Harris said that this wasn't visual enough, so changed it.
Harris wanted Chris to essentially become a scripter (letting Jim/bob plot {and
we all know how that turned out}) on the book that for all intents and purposes
he (Claremont) had created.  

One thing of note, If you get a chance, get Claremont to tell you what his plans
for the storylines following the creation of the new series.  It's wonderful
sounding(esp. considering the crap that we got to see).  I'll post it if there's interest.

------SCAVENGER


-- 
KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Cable is Nathan Summers?
Date: 14 Sep 92 15:15:03 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Sep12.151236.58837@cc.usu.edu> sl859@cc.usu.edu writes:
>In article <12SEP199219093529@vxcrna.cern.ch>, mmunoz@vxcrna.cern.ch (MUNOZ,MARC./DG) writes:
>> Only a terrible idea I've this morning:
>> Maybe Cable is Doug/Warlock-Doulock?
>>                MArc
>Hey,
>	Sounds good to me.  I mean RL probably could have written 
>him originally easily without any concern for the real powers that 
>either of them have...
>					wReam...
>				     Ultimate Ninja!
>
>P.S.  Image must be doing something, cuz all my 15 year old brother's
>friends have decided to drop all Xbooks and pick up the Image books...
>Maybe with them out of the way we can expect Marvel to cater to the 
>intelligent Xbook readers... One can only hope.

That's right:  one can ONLY hope.  It'll never happen, though, since
Marvel will most likely see all these fanboys jumping ship and try
to get them back by making all their books even more fanboyish (is
that a real word?).  I don't think I have the stomach for that.

-- 
"Dog bites man--that's not a story.  Man bites dog--*that's* a story.  And
if the dog and the man slug it out for six issues, and then Wolverine shows
up for a guest appearance, and the dog turns out to be a mutant, that's a
*Marvel* story!"			-Marvel Editorial Handbook
From: albert@chain.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Rick Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Excalibur #56 (SPOILERS)
Date: 12 Sep 1992 17:18:19 GMT
Organization: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tx

In article <rlcarr.05gs@animato.network23.com> rlcarr@animato.network23.com (Rich Carreiro) writes:
>Warning...warning...

>Wow...Davis continues to eviscerate the dangler list...is this REALLY
>an X-book? :-)
>
> -- Sat-yr-9 and Jamie (and the real Vixen?) escaped.  It would have been
>    nicer if this had been finished once and for all.

	Hey, methinks it's good that they aren't acting like the X-men
and killing all the old villains.  It would have been nice if they 
had gotten someone after all that grief.

>Questions:
> -- If Meggan is not bound by the "strings" Jamie manipulates, then
>    why was Meggan helpless against Jamie when they fought his alternate
>    during the Cross-Time Caper?

	Meggan wasn't aware of her true powers then.

> -- What did/does Sat-yr-9 want with Kitty?

	She knows Kitty's one of the 12.  ;-)

	Or it actually could be that Sat-yr-9 knows that Kitty is 
	1> very intelligent (genius plus)
	2> can phase (an excellent power for a spy/thief/assassin)
	3> is young and impressionable (see Kitty's 15th birthday issue),
Sat. was starting her down a corrupt path ("We make our own rules")
	4> is a (ack) ninja

	If Sat. could "corrupt" Kitty, she'd have an awesome operative.
Not to mention Kitty's forgotten mystic potential. (she wielded 
Magik's Soulsword, and could see her astral form)
-- 
Rick Jones				Systems Support Center
albert@bcm.tmc.edu			Baylor College of Medicine
Voice: 713-798-7352			standard disclaimers apply
"I'm the Chosen One.  And I choose to go shopping."-Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: 12mwingfield@gallua.gallaudet.edu
Subject: Who was the Traitor?
Organization: Gallaudet University
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 18:54:49 GMT

AS of Wizard #14, there was a theroy that Bishop might be the one who the
traitor, since he has a different perspective and philosophy of handling those
who broke Golden Age law.  Since, he is here with the current X-Men, he find it
frustrating to apply his philosophy to his tactics of  battling, he might be
the one who decides that the X-Men should have a martyr, so he might be the one
who kills off Prof. X.  That might be a theory.
From: f1toyl@uta.fi (Topi Ylinen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Why I like Claremont's Excalibur
Date: 15 Sep 92 13:25:14 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: University of Tampere, Finland

Simply put: the usual run-of-the-mill writer sees Excalibur as
a GROUP OF SUPERHEROES and treats them thus. *yawn*

Unlike mr. Claremont, to whom Excalibur was always equal to 
FIVE INDIVIDUAL PERSONS. And his (at times complicated) plots 
reflected that.


This is one of the facts which prove Claremont was always far ahead
all his competitors as a super hero comic writer.
-- 
FERGIEEEEE! 
	COME BACK!
	DON'T LEAVE MEEE!
	!!!!!!!!
From: jwlr@gauguin.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Hulk to Join the X-Men!!
Date: 11 Sep 92 22:33:15 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Sep11.152004.1@woods.ulowell.edu> lombardif@woods.ulowell.edu writes:

>My original article was meant as a joke, I guess you ALL missed
>it ( or it wasn't that funny ) but anyway
>Most of the X-Men were mutants, that IS their claim to fame
>So if we can't laugh at comic, what CAN we laugh at??

I got it.
I laughed.
'Nuff said.
			James Willer
{the opinions above are probably NOT those of
 anyone at all}
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: clark@netcom.com (Sue Clark)
Subject: Re: Excalibur #56 (SPOILERS)
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 16:05:05 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

rlcarr@animato.network23.com (Rich Carreiro) writes:

>Warning...warning...
>

>Wow...Davis continues to eviscerate the dangler list...is this REALLY
>an X-book? :-)

>Pros:
> -- We know how Sat-yr-9 escaped
> -- We know what happened to the nerd Widget gated to her (he's dead).
> -- We know what happened to the real Courtney Ross (dead).
> -- Nigel Frobisher was killed.
> -- Neat flashbacks/rememberances of the CPTB.
> -- We now know that even Jamie (our world's Jamie) didn't know about
>    his reality-warping powers.
Good points. :)

>Cons:
> -- Alys{ande|dane} is dead.
> -- "The focussed totality of my psychic powers!"  ARRRRRGH!
> -- Sat-yr-9 and Jamie (and the real Vixen?) escaped.  It would have been
>    nicer if this had been finished once and for all.
I thought vixen died w/Nigel.

>Questions:
> -- If Meggan is not bound by the "strings" Jamie manipulates, then
>    why was Meggan helpless against Jamie when they fought his alternate
>    during the Cross-Time Caper?
I'd prefer to think it's because Megan, as a character, is growing.  I
think we could attribute such a change to Davis' writing.

> -- Why did they suddenly change Alysande's name to Alysdane?
Bad editing?

> -- Who's trying to frame her?
> -- What effects will Psylocke's psychic knife have on Jamie?
It's not just a knife, it's fotomypp.  But does it stay permanently
sharpened?  And did she get an extra set of steak knives with it?

> -- What did/does Sat-yr-9 want with Kitty?
Personally I think if you're running a crime empire a
computer/electronics genius with fighting and evasive skills could be
sort of handy to keep around.

Sue
-- 
-----------------
Sue Clark
clark@netcom.com
From: albert@chain.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Rick Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: New Warriors Discussion
Date: 8 Sep 1992 00:36:10 GMT
Organization: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tx

In article <1685B1038E.REBECCA@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu> REBECCA@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (Rebecca Drayer) writes:
>How would they disable his powers in the first place?  I know that the Vault
>is supposed to be the result of the research done by Project: Pegasus, but
>did they ever find a way to neutralize a telekinetic?

	Presumably, they use the old tried and true ACME mutant power 
damper, available to anyone in the Marvel Universe except Rogue
and Cyclops.  
-- 
Rick Jones				Systems Support Center
albert@bcm.tmc.edu			Baylor College of Medicine
Voice: 713-798-7352			standard disclaimers apply
"I'm the Chosen One.  And I choose to go shopping."-Buffy the Vampire Slayer
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: lombardif@woods.ulowell.edu
Subject: Re: Superman to join the X-MEN!!!!!!!
Organization: University of Lowell
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 15:28:01 GMT

In article <1992Sep13.082710.11034@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au>, whijv2@cspyr1.cs.adfa.oz.au (WHITAKER JASON) writes:
> Yes that's right folks. Superman will be joining the X-men
> in a couple of months.
> 
> That's why they are killing him off in the DC universe, so he can
> transfer to the X-men.:)
> 
> Should be good huh?
> 
> The Sneaky One

Sorr about the e-mail Sneaky person.... hit th' wrong button.

Anyway.. You stole my idea Dammitt!!! Wahh!!!!!

-The Viking

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: m23364@mwunix (James Meritt)
Subject: mimic 
Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean VA
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 14:55:08 GMT

In article <1992Sep11.133040.1917@bvc.edu> daikerjohnc@bvc.edu writes:
}   I thought Mimic was a mutant too. Anyone REALLY know his origin? As I
}recall, it was retold in Marvel Comics Presents, Wolvie vs. The Hulk.
}Nowadays he's a Wolvie clone in the most literal sense.

Fooling around Dad's chem set.  Explosion & Cal inhaled vapors.

Should it be so easy...
From: gt6223b@prism.gatech.EDU (Jerry B. Ray)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: New X-Force and U.X-Men
Date: 5 Sep 92 16:58:29 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

X-Force (yeah, i still read it...):

I was pleasantly surprised.  Sure, the mindless violence was still there,
and Sam is still somewhat out of character, but at least the finally got
Sunspot back.  If they'd just get rid of Feral, and keep Cable and Domino
out of the action, i think it'll be alright.

X-Men:

I was WAY beyond pleasantly surprised.  Let me gripe a bit first, though.
Why were only some of the X-Men there at to protect Xavier?
Why was no one guarding him personally?
Why were they standing around in twos, with no visible means of communication,
instead of setting up a real perimeter?
Why was Sunspot invisible in the X-Force scene? :-)
Did anyone else have trouble recognizing Colossus?  I thought he was Hank at
first, until i read the grocery store scene more closely.

Now for the good.  Spoilers, maybe.

The art was actually pretty good.  I'll keep my fingers crossed.

There was a little bit of continuity.  The got the X-Factor footnote right,
brought back the image inducer, mentioned events over in Wolvie's title...

There was at least a token stab at character development.  Jean confronted
Scott about Betsy (great combination of telepathic arguing and physical
jestures) (was that Betsy standing in the store across the street, or is
she still in Britain.  If it's not her, then our theories about her mucking
with Scott's mind are a bit weaker now.)  Storm and Gambit talked for 
about the first time since he joined. 

I laughed out loud at the X-Factor scene.


Now a question.  Didn't i read somewhere that 'Cable' shot the Prof with
the transmode virus?  If so, where'd he get it from?  I know this is a
stretch, but maybe they'll get Warlock and Doug back somewhere in this.
After all, 'Lock is the only source of the virus we've seen other than
the Magus, whos dead on some destroyed planet anyway.

Maybe there is still hope (but i still want Claremont back!).

JRjr


-- 
'Hear the tale of a fallen people, destined to wander their broken land.
Their eyes are vacant, full of empty meaning, and what they're missing they
just don't understand.  Beyond the dark horizon, out where the people are
crying, a Morningstar will be rising, rising to show us the way...' Whiteheart
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Subject: Re: The new X-Force and U.X-Men
Reply-To: jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox)
Organization: Columbia University
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 07:17:42 GMT

In article <1992Sep5.040937.14256@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER) writes:
>Well it looks like that after a year, X-Force is finally starting to 
>live up to it's potential. (Note I said starting to).  The past two issues
>have been down right readable. I did not regret buying them.  
>It looks like the New Mutants are back in all but name. Get rid of Feral and
>change Warpath back to Thunderbird and it'll be just about right. 

  Well, Magma and Empath will be showing up in New Warriors in a few
months, so hopefully Fabian will have the brains to bring them back to
X-Force.

  Now if only they'd follow up the last panel of the X-tinction
Agenda...I want Doug and Warlock back!

(That would leave just Dani and Illyana to de-Weezie-ize, and Shan to
resolve danglers (I heard she's appeared in recent Wolverines?  Can
anyone give a brief plot summary?) before the whole real New Mutants
are back, all ready for Chris Claremont to start writing them after
Marvel fires Bob Harras.  [Right.])

Jonathan Lennox
jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Spider-Man is joining the X-Men!!
Date: 10 Sep 92 03:30:53 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Sep9.145520.10926@linus.mitre.org> m23364@mwunix (James Meritt) writes:
>In article <1992Sep9.081154.1@woods.ulowell.edu> lombardif@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
>}Yes, it's true!!! Spider-Man will soon be joining all the
>}X-Groups as it is revealed that he IS, in fact, a Mutant.
>
>Why should this be a consideration?  They have had non-mutant members.
>In fact, one of their field commanders in action has been a non mutant.

You almost had me stumped on this one.  Almost.  But I know who you're
talking about.  The formerly deceased (but not any more) Calvin Rankin,
also known as the Mimic, right?

BTW, how many non-mutant X-Men have there been?  I know of Mimic and
Longshot, but have there been any others?  Just curious.  I can't
think of any others right now, and was wondering if there were any.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: MHART00@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU (mason hart)
Subject: Excalibur Answers
Organization: Rice University  
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 06:06:20 GMT

Excalibur #55 raised a number of questions on the net, some of
which have yet to be answered to everyone's satisfaction.  I'll
try to resolve a few of them :
 
In issue number 3, a naive old guy named Rupert Holloway stepped
through a Widget-gate looking for aliens, and encountered Opal
Lun Sat-yr-9, presumably a prisoner on Earth 839 (the stomping
ground of Linda McQuillan, Captain U.K.).  We can assume that
Sat-yr-9 escapes through the Widget-gate into Excalibur's Earth
616, since she shows up at the apartment of Courtney Ross at the
end of issue 5, wearing Rupert Holloway's clothes.  When Brian
appears a few minutes later, Courtney is a charcoal stain on the
carpet, and Sat-yr-9 has taken her place.
 
Later, Sat-yr-9 (as Ross) sends obedient slave Nigel Frobisher
to recruit the Technet, who have been trapped on Earth, ironically,
by Saturnyne for failing to capture Phoenix.  Frobisher hires the
Technet to rescue Jamie Braddock from the clutches of the "evil"
Doc Croc, which they succeed in doing (issues 13 and 15).
 
In issue 21, Frobisher and Braddock wrest control of the London
underworld from Vixen, who is not prepared to deal with Jamie's
power.  Jamie first turns Vixen into a dog, then merges her shape
and persona with Frobisher's (who is not at all happy with the
arrangement).  Jamie explained it something like, "When you need
to be Vixen, you are; when you need to be Nigel, you are."  We
see this in action in issue 27 and again in "Girls' School From
Hell" (the number escapes me).
 
So Sat-yr-9/Ross has been a busy little bitch for quite some
time, now.
 
 
Some plot threads yet unresolved:
 
Why was Vixen pursuing the boy Colin (now Ky'lun) through that
warehouse way back in issue 2?
 
Why did Sat-yr-9 take the trouble to help Kitty out when she was
separated from the team during the Cross-Time mess?  Why send her
to St. Cyril's?  And what is it about St. Cyril's that neutralizes
Kitty's mutant power to phase?
 
 
"if it don't kill you, it can only make you stronger."
-- mason hart, rice u.
From: daikerjohnc@bvc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: New X-Force and U.X-Men
Date: 11 Sep 92 19:05:18 CDT
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA


>>   Somehow Xavier brings Doug back to life as Douglock (I like to think
>>Xavier's infected parts go wild, infecting anything near, i.e. the remaining 
>>infection in Doug's body), as Cable PLANNED.  Thus Douglock is born, giving
>>X-Force the muscle it needs to survive so Cable can leave, AFTER curing 
>>Xavier. The future must have a cure to the Transmode Virus.

>Nice theory, except they already have all the muscle they need. The team is
>full of some of the more powerful young characters in the Marvel Universe.
>Warpath went head to head with Juggernaut and stayed with him for a while,
>Cannonball is well nigh invulnerable when blasting (which explains the
>outrageous chin they put on him sometimes), and the rest aren't exactly
>slouches: Rictor, Feral, Shatterstar. Douglock would not be half so
>welcome to me as that little girl with all the PowerPack powers from
>the annual. She could be brought in without resurrecting Doug and 
>Warlock, thus helping slow the Marvel RevolvingDoorO'Death (TM).


    True, very true. But I didn't mean PHYSICAL MUSCLE.
 
   Every Arthur (Sam) needs a Merlin (Douglocke), a.k.a. advisor, or confidant.
Where the team would be emotional, hot-blooded, and brutal, Douglocke would be
cold, calculated, and intellectual. A PERFECT foil for the youthful, idealistic
Sam Guthrie. In a situation where Sam might be picked up in emotion, such as
the death of a friend in the middle of combat, Douglocke's computer-like
detatchment (as shown in the newest Annual) about the situation, and firm focus 
on the goal-at-hand would help Sam orient his own focus back onto reality and 
the situation at hand, as the others would go into a mindless, unfocused rage 
oblivious to the entire situation. If Sam wants to be a true leader, he has to
keep his head in a crisis. Douglocke would help this function immensely.  
    And Powerpax really shouldn't be introduced until the team is older, and a 
little more experienced, to balance her youthful enthusiasm. 
    I know Sam will one day be a great leader. But right now, he's still an
inexperienced teenager. Douglocke would be an invaluable aid to his
decision-making processes. Cable, if he had any insight at all, would know
this. 
    Maybe I'm wrong, or maybe I'm right. Knowing the X-Books lately, I'm
probably wrong. But I'll bet it's better than what Lobdell'll think up. 

    JCD
From: mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael J. Keating)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Claremont
Date: 9 Sep 92 00:02:19 GMT
Organization: Freshman, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Funny, all these years I though that Chris Claremont was a woman!  Are
you sure that he(she's) not?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Request for Kid Dynamo
From: mcutter@gacvx2.gac.edu
Date: 11 Sep 92 12:14:53 -0600
Organization: Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, Minnesota

I lost net access this summer, just as the New Mutants story Kid Dynamo was
getting started.  Can anyone send me a copy or tell me were to get one?  E-mail
either of the following addresses. Thanks in advace.

-Matt

********************************************************************************
Peace through strength!                          Victory through annihilation!!
Matt Cutter, e-mail to mcutter@vax2.gac.edu OR spock@vax1.gac.edu
Gustavus couldn't afford my opinions if they wanted them!
********************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks