HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sweeney@MSUCES.CANR.MSU.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Printing Windows 3.1 Applications
Date: 19 Aug 92 19:07:02 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-To:         WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET, bob%worms-emh2.army.mil@msu.edu

Bob,

Here's some new info that might liven things up.

The first instance of a TrueType font causes havoc, but if I change the font
later in the document (TrueType OR built-in) everything returns to normal and
prints out fine.

This first use of a Truetype font can come at the very beginning of
the document, or after a built-in font has printed, it doesn't seem to matter.

(In case that wasn't very clear)

Example:

First Paragraph                 TrueType        Garbled
Second Paragraph                TrueType        OK~
Third Paragraph                 HP III Internal OK~

OR~

First Paragraph                 HP III Internal OK~
Second Paragraph                TrueType        Garbled~
Third Paragraph                 TrueType        OK~

Curiouser and Curiouser...~
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Vmsmail-To: SMTP%"WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@pucc.Princeton.EDU"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 08:31:54 +1000
From:         WITOLD <WITOLD@HOTBLK.DSTO.GOV.AU>
Subject:      Re: CGA driver for Windows 3.1
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@pucc.Princeton.EDU

I believe there is a CGA driver for Win 3.1 that comes on one
of the supplemental driver libraries that can be found at
ftp.cica.indiana.edu.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Witold Waldman
 Aeronautical Research Laboratory   Internet: witold@hotblk.dsto.gov.au
 Melbourne                          Fax     : +61 3 646 7771
 Australia                          Tel     : +61 3 647 7488
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 13 Aug 1992 09:12:58 CDT
From:         Domingo Martinez <AGDNDMC@MIZZOU1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: How do I resize BITMAPS?
              13 Aug 1992 11:59:44 GMT from <glenn@ADMIN.ACADIAU.CA>

From:
GLENN DAVIDSON <glenn@ADMIN.ACADIAU.CA> asks how to resize bitmaps.

Answer: You are right: Paintbrush cannot do it by itself.  The best way to do a
 controlled resizing is to use a utility like Graphics Workshop (for Windows or
 for DOS).  Resizing works quite better when you make SMALLER bitmaps.  But if
you want to make larger bitmaps, you are bound to notice the loss of detail.  I
n other words, your are increasing the size but not increasing the amount of in
formation (i.e. pixels and colors).  I do not know if there are more "intellige
nt" programs which will fill the space with well-educated guesses as of colors
and number of pixels.

That is the reason why one should get the images with as many colors as
possible, and as large as your patience may allow, even above the capacities of
 your current system.

Another program is Paint Shop.  (both are shareware.  I have seen Paint Shop
at WUARCHIVE.WUSTL.EDU IN mirrors/msdos/windows3/PSPRO101.ZIP.

Finally, you can combine any viewer (including PaintBrush itself) with clip-and
-paste operations to get the right size. PaintShop is, however, the best altern
ative for this particular task, because it allows you to see the new image befo
re saving it.


Good luck,

AGDNDMC@MIZZOU1.MISSOURI.EDU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 18 Aug 1992 16:04:00 EST
From:         cbowie@NSF.GOV
Subject:      Re: date format inanities
X-To:         "Chet Farmer Asst. Dir. Project IDEALS" <CFARMER1@UA1VM.BITNET>,
              john stone <JSTONE@nsf.gov>, WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET

                STANDARD USENET REPLY FORM

To  : WIN3-L___________________
From: CHUCK BOWIE______________

I have read your recent post concerning DATE FORMATS___________
posted to WIN3-L______________.

I regret that due to severe time constraints I am unable to respond
to your posting directly.

However, I would like to advise you that I believe that your posting:

contains an unacceptable number of errors in:
_______logic
_______fact
_______spelling/grammar

is based on stereotypes of:
_______race, ethnic, national origin
_______gender differences
_______sexual orientation / preferences
_______regionalisms
_______employer and/or school affiliations
_______religious affiliation/non-affiliation

_______violates commonly accepted signature size standards

violates net standards concerning:
___x___posting to world distribution subjects not of general interest
___x___posting elementary technical questions which should be resolved
       at local site
___x___limiting postings to appropriate groups only
_______editing of quoted material
_______posting of copyrighted material

is uninteresting because it:
_______contains hackneyed expressions
___x___contains outright stupidities
_______is inherently self-contradictory
_______reflects inadequate intellectual development or maturity
_______reiterates points made better by others
_______is a gratuitous attack on an obvious provocateur

contains inane offers to make comaparison with other readers concerning:
_______SAT scores
_______genital size
_______frequency of sexual activity
_______age at first exposure to computers
_______knowledge of obscure technical information not of general interest

reflects serious misunderstandings concerning:
___x___the basic functioning of USENET
___x___your role in the functioning of USENET
___x___other's interest in what you do or don't do
___x___the nature of sarcasm or satire or humor in general
From: "larry koester" <larry.koester@execnet.com>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: creating windows .hlp
Date: 19 Aug 92 07:49:57 EST
Reply-To: "larry koester" <larry.koester@execnet.com>
Distribution: uunet
Organization: Executive Networks Information

BN>      Anyone recommend a tool for creating .HLP files for Windows
BN>   applications?  I've someone developing in Visual Basic, but they
BN>   want to put together .HLP files ... and we aren't using SDK at
BN>   all, so ...

    You you will need the help compiler, of course.  And an editor to
    prepare the rich text files for the compiler to work upon.  Xantippe
    and QDHELP are two shareware items that will do this.  Some windows
    word processors do too.

    The help compiler can be gotten separately from Microsoft or bundled
    with any number of compilers.  The recent Professional Toolkit
    offered my Microsoft also has it as part of the package.

    Larry
---
  DeLuxe 1.25 #641s  Now using Qmail DeLuxe...and loving it!
--
Executive Network Information System  (914) 667-4567
International ILink Host
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 19:22:00 EST
From:         Joe Morris <IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: CGA driver for Windows 3.1
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu

Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 11:26:32 CST
From: A16905%ITESO.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu

> How can I log on CICA ?   I tried anonymous and the server refused me !

If you try between 7AM - 7PM M-F, chances are Cica refused you.  Try
after 7PM or over the weekend.  This does not apply to all sites--I'm
fortunate enough to be able to access Cica at anytime so I don't have
the same experience you encounter.  Even then I'm not able to get on
due to lack of open ports.

I believe the mirror sites are not as restrictive.

Joe Morris, undergraduate & Assoc. Data Analyst in Raleigh, NC
Western Carolina Univerity                               Practice safe hex,
Internet:  IS480P02@WCUVAX1.WCU.EDU                 Just say NO to viruses,
BITNET:    IS480P02@WCUVAX1.BITNET     And always wear a write-protect tab.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Company: NAVSURFWARCEN COASTSYSTA
Address: Code 3130 Panama City FL
Phone: (904) 235-5994
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 13:13:01 CDT
From:         Moore <moore@EMAIL.NCSC.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Silly WinQWK Questions
X-To:         win3-l@uicvm.uic.edu

Greetings.

Anyone using WinQWK out there? I'm evaluating v2.0a, downloading QWK messages
from a BBS that carries Fidonet echoes and reading them off-line. My questions
are these:

(1) how do I mark several messages for deletion, rather than hitting Delete on
    each individual message?
(2) how do I upload replies? do I have to save each message to a file and
    upload them separately?

Thanks for any help. This may be too special-interest for the group, so please
respond to me directly and I'll summarize...

--
Jim (moore@email.ncsc.navy.mil)

I drive the very latest hover car.     I met someone who looks a lot like you.
  I don't know where you are,                She does the things you do,
but I miss you so much till then.      but she is an IBM.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 17:38:01 LCL
Comments:     <Parser> W: Invalid RFC822 field -- "From mariuszg Tue Aug 18
              00:". Rest of header flushed.
Comments:     <Parser> E: "From:"/"Sender:" field is missing.
From:         Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster <POSTMASTER@UICVM.BITNET>

I am using Windows 3.1 with Superstor and all working corectly. On the second
 computer a have instaled Stacker and Windows 3.1 and all is OK too.

Bye for now,

Mariusz Gieparda
internet: mariuszg@oippuxv.poz.edu.pl
FIDO    : 2:481/1.7@fidonet.org
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.bitnet"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 18 Aug 1992 08:22:00 CDT
From:         Aaron Crane <ACRANE@MACC.WISC.EDU>
Subject:      Sharing the processor

Hello,

        I have a basic Window's programming question.  My program doesn't
seem to want to share the processor with any other programs.  It
must think the work it is doing is more important.  I am using
Borland C++ 3.1 w/ application frameworks.  In my innermost
computational loop (where the program spends a lot of time), I
put the following statement in an effort to share the processor:

        PeekMessage( &msg, NULL, 0, 0, PM_NOREMOVE );

This is to no avail, no mouse-clicks or keystrokes will transfer
control to another app.

        Any suggestions?

Thanks,
        Aaron Crane
        acrane@macc.wisc.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Sat, 15 Aug 1992 15:07:39 -0400
From:         "JAIME M. GARMENDIA,
              DUPONT ARGENTINA" <garmenjm@ARVX01.DNET.DUPONT.COM>
Subject:      Epson LX-810 problem
X-cc:         GARMENJM@esds01.es.dupont.com

After posting a note about problems with printing graphics and True-Type
fonts on my EPSON LX-810, I decided to re-install the driver from win3.0
, and now everythign prints just fine. So there is a bug after all
in the new driver from the original upgrade. Does anybody
in the list know if the Epson drivers have been upgraded since the
release of win3.1?

Jaime Garmendia
DuPont Argentina
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 19 Aug 1992 14:35:07 MDT
From:         "Ian P. Mitchell" <22016@UCDASVM1.ADMIN.UCALGARY.CA>
Subject:      del misc lines in .ini files

From:    Ian P. Mitchell
*** Resending note of 92-08-19 12:03

> Microsoft uses both methods, putting information into win.ini
> that is necessary for other applications, i.e. font info for
> printer drivers, but creating a private file also - such as
> winword.ini, excel4.ini.....
> So, what it comes down to is that there is no easy way to
> spot unneeded lines in win.ini, unless you know exactly what
> each entry refers to.

This touches on a question that was posed a few weeks back and I don't recall
having seen an answer.
Someone asked if there was a way to be sure that you had
deleted *all* files and removed all info from WIN.INI etc when you de-install
an application.

Just the other day I saw an application called DELTA that seems to try to
do this. I have not done a thorough test but the program keeps a record
of directory contents and file sizes etc and presumably lets you know
differences after you have installed. As I say, I have not done much work
with it but maybe someone else has?

Ian
From: moore@EMAIL.NCSC.NAVY.MIL (Moore)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: Flowchart program
Date: 14 Aug 92 17:11:13 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Company: NAVSURFWARCEN COASTSYSTA
Address: Code 3130 Panama City FL
Phone: (904) 235-5994
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
X-To:         WIN3-l@uicvm.uic.edu
              92 10:32 am

>
> Does anyone know which software can produce flowchart easily ?
>

Roykore makes ABC Flowcharter for Windows 3.X; I have version 1.13, which
occasionally behaves oddly, but that may be because it's an old version.
They're

Roykore, Inc.
2215 Filbert St.
San Francisco, CA 94123
(415) 563-9175

--
Jim (moore@email.ncsc.navy.mil)

I drive the very latest hover car.     I met someone who looks a lot like you.
  I don't know where you are,                She does the things you do,
but I miss you so much till then.      but she is an IBM.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 11:15:25 CST
From:         A16905@ITESO.BITNET
Subject: Re: Super VGA

I guess there is a 'Large Fonts' options somewhere in the Control Panel
or SetUp.

Still waiting for my Windows Copy....

Shalom,
Memo.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 13 Aug 1992 17:14:17 +0200
From:         Frode Mong <fmong@ADH.NO>
Subject:      Re: clockprogram
X-To:         win3-l@uicvm.uic.edu

>I want to write a clock program similar to one I've seen for the Mac.  Using
>any font I would display the time in the title bar, just to the left of the
>minimize/maximize buttons.  I've see how some applications create areas in the
>title bar, (Prisma Your Way and hDC apps).  Any hints on how to do this?  Is
>there one already out there?

Try a program called timefram.zip. You will probably find it on the ftp-server
called nic.funet.fi in the directory /pub/msdos/windows/desktop, or you could
search for it using Archie.

Hope this helps

Frode Mong
Agder Regional College, Norway
Internet: fmong@adh.no
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 08:45:23 CDT
From:         Mary Jo deMeza <demezam@UWWVAX.UWW.EDU>
Subject:      Re: mad mice
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU

>
>I have experienced a similar problem and found the source of the problem
>to be Afterdark.  I switched to a new screen saver and this problem
>stopped.
>
>Has anybody else had trouble with AfterDark after upgrading to WIN 3.1?
>
>Richard Kneeley.

Yes, but with my keyboard.  I bought a new machine for home that came
with WIN 3.1 installed.  After installing AfterDark, the keyboard no
longer works when I run Windows.  If I don't load AfterDark, the
keyboard works fine.  Haven't had time to explore alternate solutions,
so I just don't use AD.

----------------------------------
Mary Jo deMeza
Academic Computing Services
University of Wisconsin-Whitewater    Phone:  (414) 472-3215
Whitewater, WI  53190                 Internet: demezam@uwwvax.uww.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 13 Aug 1992 16:10:00 EDT
From:         Vince Scarafino <Scarafino@MULTICS-A.PMS.FORD.COM>
Subject:      Re: mad mice
X-To:         Microsoft Windows Version 3 Forum
              <WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU>

 >Date:  13 August 1992 12:54 edt
 >From:  Richard Kneeley <KNEELEY%PACEVM.BITNET at PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU>
 >Subject:  Re: mad mice

 >I have experienced a similar problem and found the source of the problem
 >to be Afterdark.  I switched to a new screen saver and this problem
 >stopped.
 >
 >Has anybody else had trouble with AfterDark after upgrading to WIN 3.1?
 >
 >Richard Kneeley.

I had a problem with the DOS part of Afterdark.  (AD_WRAP.COM or
AD-DOS.COM, I'm not sure which one, since I removed them both.)  One of
my DOS programs that printed out FAX images would hang, requiring me to
boot.  I did not have this problem with Windows 3.0.  I still use the
Windows Afterdark screensaver, though, and have had no problems with it.
Of course I have no way to password protect the machine in DOS mode, and
screensaver doesn't kick in if I have a DOS Window as the active one,
but it works okay for Windows based stuff.

Vince
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L%UICVM.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 16:16:00 CDT
From:         "Wile E. Coyote" <BBHULSEY@LIFE.UAMS.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Passing parameters.
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU

Greetings!

Doug Cutler writes:

>    I am just moving to Windows from DOS 5.0.  In the DOSSHELL when you
>set up the Propeties for an item you can specify that you wish to enter
>a paramters by the %variable which will give you a pop-up in which to
>enter the data e.g. a program name for QBasic or an address for a terminal
>program.  Is there such a facility in Windows that I have missed????

If you're running a DOS application from windows, and you want to be prompted
for a parameter before you run it, go into the .PIF editor and select the .pif
file for that application.  In the Optional Parameters line put a question
mark and save your .pif file.  Now, when you click on that application's icon,
you'll be prompted for a parameter.  What you type will then become part of
the command line for that application before it is run.  Hope this is what
you're looking for!

.......
:  o/ : Bruce Hulsey
: <|  : Univ. of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
: / > : internet: bbhulsey@life.uams.edu
:.....: bitnet:   bbhulsey@uams
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
From: advogl@iastate.edu (Allen D Vogl)
Subject: Re: Stacker & Superstor
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 13:44:01 GMT

In article <d-!nvgg.fuzzy@netcom.com> fuzzy@netcom.com (Fuzzy Fox) writes:
>TEMPEST <TEMPEST@CORRAL.UWYO.EDU> writes:
>
>Why do people continue to post misinformation?!
>
>>2.   They make your system less reliable,  disk Recovery tools from pctools and
>> norton are usless with a stacked drive,  and a few s
>>hareware programs that directly Read from Stacker and Write Directly to the FAT
>> will NUKE your drive.  Unfortunatly Few PD and SHARE
>>WARE place these problems in their documentation.
>
>This is WRONG.  The Stacker software emulates a drive, all the way down
>to the FAT tables, so Norton Utilities like DiskEdit, UnErase, and
>EraseProtect work JUST FINE!!!
>



Ditto!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


ADV







Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Organization: Penn State University / University Libraries
X-Envelope-to: win3-l@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: WIN3_L
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Thu, 20 Aug 1992 15:55:00 EST
From:         "J.Lance Wilkinson, (814) 865-1818" <JLW@PSULIAS.BITNET>
Subject:      Progman secret screen?
X-To:         WIN3-L@PSULIAS.BITNET

> I theink this hidden screens is something to massivley protest about. If I
> assume that ten applications have hidden screens which take 100KBytes of
> code and pictures each then 1 MByte of my harddisk is wasted by this
> garbage. MS and others should really think about this and get away with it.

My discussion list importer was just subscribed to this list, and 80% of the
postings since signing on have related to this "secret screen" and whether it's
appropriate or not.  I remember reading about it back before I brought up 3.1,
in PC Week or InfoWorld or someplace; I don't recall the incantations to invoke
them, however, and of course any mention of them here predated my signon.  Can
somebody [maybe somebody who likes them] tell me what I need to do to bring
them up?

+-"Never Underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of mag tapes"--+
| J.Lance Wilkinson ("Lance")            BitNet:    JLW@PSULIAS.BITNET      |
| Systems Design Specialist - Lead       InterNet:  JLW@PSULIAS.PSU.EDU     |
| Library Computing Services             AT&T:      (814) 865-1818          |
| E8 Pattee Library                      "I'd rather be dancing..."         |
| Penn State University         A host is a host from coast to coast,       |
| University Park, PA 16802     And no one will talk to a host that's close |
| <POSTMAST@PSULIAS.BITNET>     Unless the host that isn't close            |
| <POSTMAST@PSUCES.BITNET>      Is busy, hung or dead.                      |
+------"He's dead, Jim. I'll get his tricorder. You take his wallet."-------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 19 Aug 1992 08:25:28 -0400
From:         sweeney@MSUCES.CANR.MSU.EDU
Subject:      Problems printing from Windows Application

X-To:  <WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET>

I am using a product called LaserPlex to connect multiple computers
to one LaserJet III printer.  LaserPlex plugs into the LaserJet's
Optional port and uses standard phone wire to connect to each
computer.  A MODE command is used to set the COM2 port to
9600,N,8,1 and redirect LPT2 to COM2.  From DOS (or a DOS window)
everything works fine.

Windows 3.1 is giving me trouble.  When I print from a Windows
Application to the LaserJet using any TrueType font, letters become
garbled or vanish completely.  If I use the LJ III's built-in fonts
everything works fine.

I have tried running with and without the print manager.
I have tried using LPT2.DOS and COM2 with and without 'printing
     directly to port'.
I have set up redirections in WIN.INI's [ports] section such as:
     LPT2:=LPT2.DOS and
     LPT2.DOS=COM2
I have made adjustments to the 386 Enhanced settings in the control
     panel in every direction I can think of.

I've run out of patience.

Since the solution to this problem could involve a great deal of
traffic, if at all possible, please send suggestions to:

     sweeney@msuces.canr.msu.edu

Working solutions (if any are found) will be posted to the list
later.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: mailout v1.26 released
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 18 Aug 1992 08:18:10 PST
From:         Ian Parker <Ian.Parker@F1.N700.Z6.FIDONET.ORG>
Subject:      Re: Stacker.
X-To:         WIN3-L@UICVM.UIC.EDU

 On 08-14-92 STRASHEA wrote to All...

 S > If hard disks were designed to be "stacked" why has it taken the
 S > software
 S > industry so long to compress the drives?  And why wasn't it
 S > an Operating System
 S >    function vs. add on software?  Maybe the physical
 S > limitations of the drive are partially to blame?

Two reasons:

1)  sufficient development of the compression algorithms

2)  relatively cheap CPU power

IF you try STACKER on a 8088 Pc, I think you'll see a performance
hit. On a 386SX20 you'll break even.

Operating Systems are always behind applications software: DOS/Windows
don't yet include indexed file handling. DEC's VAX/VMS only started
bundling relational database facilities recently. I guess some version
of Windows NT will include disk compression.

Alternatively, the compression may end up being built into the controllers

(as is the case for some tape drives).

___----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ian Parker                                             Tel: +852 571 2400
Salcom Asia                                            Fax: +852 510 8562
18/f West Tower, Bond Centre, Drake Street, Hong Kong

... OFFLINE 1.40
--
uucp: uunet!m2xenix!puddle!6!700!1!Ian.Parker
Internet: Ian.Parker@f1.n700.z6.fidonet.org
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU