HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: darcy@panix.com (Darcy Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: LOVING:Molestation?!
Date: 24 Jul 92 18:20:00 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC

In article <23JUL199211154038@mrl.arc.nasa.gov> holst@mrl.arc.nasa.gov (Laura Holst) writes:

>
>From yesterday's (Wednesday's) show, I got the impression they did have
>sex, what with Cooper saying to her how sorry he was and how what they
>did was dirty.  I think Selina was pretty kinky !!  IMHO, you don't "comfort"
>a little boy THAT way.

no.. they did not have sex.. selena specifically said that they did not have
sex..  and cooper said that he touched her.. she then said that he was just
curious and that she was wrong because he let him touch her..  i agree here..
she is an adult and she should have known when to stop, a 12 year old may not
know the implications.. 

>>would running out the nanny be sufficient punishment for having sex with
>>your 11 year-old son? I THINK NOT!!Wouldn't that be considered child
>I thought Cooper was 12, but still !

you are right laura.. he was 12.. 

>>molestation?! If that had been my kid, I would have strung her up from
>>the nearest tree! So someone tell me if they did or didn't!
i thought this was dumb and that cooper's parent's did overact!! they sure
jumped to conclusions fast!

yes.. you can assume something happened BUT you can also assume that cooper was
scared and she stayed with him while he slept.. the way they acted was as if
selena was nude..  or they caught them in the middle of something.. !!

>>Now we know how Jack leaves the show without taking Stacy. How long
>>will he be missing? And when he comes back, what will be the story?

>I wish they would've shown a little more of what happened to Jack,

I AGREE!!!!!!  i was practically laughing!!  what makes them think that jack
drowned 22 miles form the dock???  his body could be caught under the dock!!

stacey said that jack went on deck to pull up the anchor and set sail so that
they could be under the stars.. he couldn't wait till morning.. when he laft
stacey fell asleep, for quite a while.. when she woke she went to look for
jack.. 

does this sound weird to anyone or is it just me..???!! they are really playing
it like he is off at sea!  they really should have got the story straight from
the beginning.. this is going to bug me..

>>Any takers? I think he'll be gone long enough for Stacy & Trucker to
>>become a "thing" & then the New & Improved Jack will resurface after
>>being stranded on an island off Pennsylvania :).
i agree... i was thinking the same thing.. 

-- 
Darcy D. Lee
			BI BY NATURE!
darcy@panix.com
cmcl2!panix!darcy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria)
Subject: Re: AMC: Anjelique's Hair [was: Re: Thanks]
Organization: MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 14:35:03 GMT

In article <41210234@hpcvra.cv.hp.com> daveo@hpcvra.cv.hp.com (Dave Ochs) writes:

>Am I the only one who actually *likes* her new hair?  I think the color is
>just fine, and personally I like the style much better ... she looked so 
>Victorian with that long wavy hair.

Actually, no Dave. I sort of like it too! I was afraid to say so.
ha ha.

CAZ
From: njs@ghost.lahabra.chevron.com (n.j.spera)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Misc. Stuff (was: Jack vs. Carly)
Date: 21 Jul 92 18:32:29 GMT
Organization: Chevron Oil Field Research Company, La Habra, CA

In article <4eP2Bgi00iUyM2PZ0W@andrew.cmu.edu>, lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu (Liz Fox) writes:
|> On 20-Jul-92 in Re: DOOL: Misc. Stuff (was:..
|> user n.j.spera@ghost.lahabra. writes:
|> >   Sis Lemon - let me remind you - it takes forever for it to change 
|> >   Remember how long it took Sheri to show up - and knowing the Days
|> >   schedule - they're getting close to being 3 weeks or more ahead now  -
|> 
|> 
|> Did anyone else notice Gene Palumbo's name in the credits on Thursday or
|> Friday??  I remember reading that Patsy had talked about her storyline
|> with both Gene and Sheri.  Anyone have any info? I remember someone
|> saying that Gene was outta here?
|> 
|> Big Banana

I'm not sure about the credits - but last week's SOW did report that
Palumbo was leaving Days to work on Manhattan Lives.

Tangy
-- 
  YEAH | Nancy J. Spera, Geophysics Division       njs@chevron.com      |  GO
  PENS | Chevron Oil Field Research Co.                                 | BUCS
  # #  | P.O. Box 446, La Habra, CA 90633-0446      Tel: (310) 694-7761 | # #
 * * * * * * *   WAY TO GO PENS   1991-1992 Stanly Cup Champions  * * * * * *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: schalene@sequent.com (Schalene Dagutis)
Subject: Re: GL
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc.
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 20:16:42 GMT

In article <1992Jul24.150323.28519@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> lkern@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Leesa J Kern) writes:
>In article <1550@emdeng.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> jreeves@emdeng.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Jack
>i.A.Reeves) writes:
>>
>>I'm glad Alan-Michael finally told Alexandra how he feels.  I don't agree
>>with how he feels, but if that how it is then he needed to tell her and
>>get it in the open.  BUT,...
>
>I DO!  I think that's EXACTLY what Alexandra will do if (and when) Nick ever 
>becomes interested in being businessman extraordinaire.  I thought this scene 
>was great.
>
I agree.  It's exactly what she'd do if Nick wanted to become a
tycoon.  She said (either in the show A-M found out about Nick or the
day after) that she thinks A-M isn't cut out for the leadership role.
He had no vision.  She also said there's room at the top for both of
them.  But there isn't.  There's always room near the top, but the top
is a single-person job.  A-M doesn't want to be near the top, he wants
to be THE top.  He'll never get it as long as Nick is "dabbling" at
Spaulding....attending board meetings, etc.  Then, Alex will always
hold out hope that HER son will be at THE top.

schalene

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kriesel@mari.acc.stolaf.edu (Julie R Kriesel)
Subject: ATWT: TAN
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:43:13 GMT



The following is what I did during my philosophy class because I was
*really* bored.  Hope it amuses you all...

_Possible Spinoffs of ATWT_  (not really!)  :-P

1.  As the Worms Squirm:  Toenail comes back from the dead and hooks up
with Cabin (who is now out of jail).  They takeover Walsh, Girlwide, and 
M&A.  They spend all of their time making the citizens of Yuckdale miserable.

2.  As the Student Learns:  College kids actually attending class, writing
papers, taking tests, and getting grades.  Of course, Yuckdale U students are
all brilliant and graduate with perfect 4.0 GPAs.  (NOT!!!!!):-P

3.  As the Stomach Churns: Court'me and Anduh, Rosehand and DuhHutch, have
a major LoveFest 23 hours a day.  Complete with nauseating background music.
Get your barf-bags ready!

4.  As the Farmhouse Burns:  The Mustang Ranch is aflame!  The Snyder clan
and other select Yuckdale citizenry form a human chain to The Pond, sending
buckets of water back in attempts to put the fire out.  Sadly, they don't
succeed.  The Snyders assume the persona of Okies (like The Grapes of Wrath)
and spend the rest of their days wandering around Yuckdale in search of a
real life.  :-P

This is what that #$@^#!^! philosophy does to me...

Special K

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: GC.AVW@forsythe.stanford.edu (RAGIN CAJUN)
Subject: Re: ATWT - Frantic's Past
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 09:50:54 GMT

In article <jmf.712078501@egret5>,
jmf@egret5.stanford.edu (Joseph M. Fierro) writes:
>n2413@cray.com (Jo Theis) writes:
>>I do have to agree with the Studmuffette's contention that it was
>>a bit insensitive of Kimster to bring up the whole fiasco, though.
>>Seriously, what was her point in regards to the current situation
>>with H2D?  "Well, you were in love with a psycho once before, so
>>you're probably in love with another one."  "You survived being
>>in love with Douglas, so you'll probably survive being in love with
>>H2D."  "Don't panic, last time someone killed him before he could
>>hurt you."  I'm sorry, I'm at a total loss here.
>
>>- JlJ
>
>  I'm sure the point Kim was trying to make was that Frannie might be
>overly suspicious of Darryl due to her previous experience with
>Douglas Cummings.  Kim even said over and over again that she
>hesitated to bring up the issue, but that both of them cannot help
>but be reminded of that sordid affair.  I don't think it was
>insensitive of Kim, she was actually trying to defend Darryl and
>explain why Frannie might be so distrustful.  I'm glad traumatic
>events from the past aren't ignored by the writers, and even cause
>long-lasting psychological problems.  Of course, once Frannie finds
>out that Darryl truly is sick and demented, she may never get
>involved with another man again.  Keep your fingers crossed, we may
>never have to suffer through another dance on the beach again.  YAAYY!
>
>                                          -Joseph M. Fierro
>
>
I found it rather interesting that Douglas Cummings name came up
right at the time that John Wesley Shipp joined the cast of AMC as
a villain there, too.

Alma
From: gibbsm@ll.mit.edu (MargARET D. Gibbs)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Ugliest Dress at Ajuleek's Garden party
Date: 23 Jul 92 12:31:12 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory

In article <1992Jul21.210943.23683@cypress.com> jql@cypress.com.UUCP (Julie Lewis--Applications) writes:
>I agree that An-Li's dress is pretty lame too.  Haley and Erica look
>by far the best.  The wardrobe department should be fired!  Overall
>this is the lamest I've ever seen women look at a party.

I just had to respond to this.  Yesterday morning I was reading the
newspaper, and a sentence jumped out at me:

"Women flounced down the runway in silk skirts and lame evening gowns..."

Makes you wonder, doesn't it? :-) :-)


-- 
Margaret D. Gibbs		"Practice random kindness and 
Assistant Staff			 senseless acts of beauty"
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
gibbsm@ll.mit.edu
From: jeanie@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (jean.c.ward)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Hair Forever!
Date: 23 Jul 92 22:45:10 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Jul23.172536.19663@hubcap.clemson.edu> kudra@hubcap.clemson.edu (sallie j kudra) writes:
>scduncan@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Sean C. Duncan, Idiot) writes:
>
>>Dammit....
>
>>First people dissin' my man Tanner for having long hair and "looking like a
>>woman" now people are getting on JACK's case for having long hair?
>
>>As a LongHairedMan (tm) I feel the need to stick up for my brethren and to
>>__________________________________________________________________________ 
>
>
>Hear, hear.  I'm a product of the sixties and can't understand all the negative
>reaction to long-hair on men.  Jeez, my husband's hair was over 2 ft. long not
>too many years ago (I was extremely jealous since it is straight and fine), and
>now it's cut short on top, but below his collar in the back.
>
>Besides which, Jack looks MUCHO better with his hair longer and not greased 
>back like it was a year ago.  Tanner's was looking a little poofy there for  
>awhile, but looks mahvelous in the ponytail.  
>
>Sallie "I love long-hair and facial hair on men" Kudra
>
>PS.  I can't seem to post successfully to this group, but have no trouble
>     doing followups.  Can someone give me some hints.  I post to 
>     rec.arts.tv.soaps and was told to let the distribution default to 
>     rec.  I can see my posts, but when I asked for replies if it was seen,
>     I got none.  Hmmm.... Maybe everybody does hate me.  Getting a little
>     paranoid here.  Any help would be appreciated.
>
>
Sally, you're getting through.  While I'm here I'd like to pass along my
vote for long hair on men, but only and I repeat only if it's styled nice
and kept clean.  The 60's were great, but there were alot of guys with
long hair that never washed it.  Yucko.

--
Jeanie
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: xxkaren@convx1.lerc.nasa.gov (Karen Pischel)
Subject: Re: AW:Byron
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 18:58:29 GMT

In article <1992Jul27.120008.1@eagle.wesleyan.edu> sscalia@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:
>A friend of mine heard a rumor that the actor who plays Byron at one time 
>was a basketball player or a model.  Is this rumor true?  Was he in a car
>accident?  He's a hunk and can definitely turn women on, including 
>me.  

I read an article in "People" magazine several months ago and it stated that
the actor who plays Byron (can't remember his name) was a model.  Apparently
he modeled from his wheelchair.  Thus, I don't know anything about an
accident.  I'm not sure if they ever showed his wheelchair, but he was
already handicapped when he started modeling!

Karen
D
D
D
D
handicapped 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: riddle@brahms.udel.edu (Tammy Riddle)
Subject: Re: DOOL:
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 20:32:05 GMT

In article <151ip5INNmhh@agate.berkeley.edu> sally@anableps.berkeley.edu (S. A. Wilson) writes:
>
>
>HELLO....HELLO....is this thing on????
>Am I getting through.
>
>
>Spud--Still crying about the fact that DingDongtheIckedWitchisabouttodie
>soon will be outtathere.
>
>
>-- 
>Sally A. Wilson               \\\\      In Heaven everything is fine....
>Potato "Salad" Peel, Spud      \\\\     You've got your good things,
>sally@mica.berkeley.edu         \\\\    And I've got mine.
>			         \\\\     [David Lynch's  _Eraserhead_]


Yes, Spudster, you are getting through loud and clear!!

--Peach, who is still totally confused why Spud would think I would pick
  on her about her height.
From: shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AW: More theories
Date: 28 Jul 92 20:00:43 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

millar@skorpio.usask.ca (Beth Millar) writes:

>My theory is that it is Roger Jackson stalking Jenna.  They
>made it quite clear that he noticed the "argument" in Tops.
>As well, Lorna mentioned something to Ada about him "liking
>them younger every year"

>Beth Millar


This makes more sense than Matt.  Roger Jackson is a secondary
and therefore disposable character.  He probably shot Rick
also.  That way, we could pave the way for Lucas to come
back if he wanted to.

-- 
Susan R. Hagan (shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu) 
Publications Coordinator - User Services
Rutgers University Computing Services
From: darcy@panix.com (Darcy Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: It's a fashion show - NOT
Date: 24 Jul 92 18:01:55 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC

In article <1992Jul23.155147.20540@leland.Stanford.EDU> thompson@waldron.Stanford.EDU (Sharon Thompson) writes:
>In article <8gHcoB1w161w@cdthq.UUCP> mitch@cdthq.UUCP (Mitch Harris) writes:
>
>>my life! It looks like Pine Valley does most of their shopping at the
>>Dollar Store. Gawd!
>
>C'mon -- high fashion is always ugly.

believe me.. angeligue's dress WAS DEFINITELY NOT high fashion!!!

high fashion.. haute couture.. has exaggerated cuts and lines and material..
mainstream stores do not follow the exact pattern stitch for stitch.. BUT they
do follow the style.. the gist of the pattern...

-- 
Darcy D. Lee
			BI BY NATURE!
darcy@panix.com
cmcl2!panix!darcy
From: harding@sun444.nas.nasa.gov (Steve Harding)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: LUST:  I'm still here
Date: 21 Jul 92 19:46:39 GMT
Reply-To: harding@sun444.nas.nasa.gov (Steve Harding)
Distribution: usa
Organization: NASA/Ames Research Center

In article <2177@sjfc.UUCP> glb3833@sjfc.UUCP (Gidget Bowden) writes:
>In article <cPg2NB3w164w@grafex.cupertino.ca.us> steveh@grafex.cupertino.ca.us (Steve Harding KA6ETB) writes:
>>
>>r/a/t/s is the only place with the crazies... miss you on the ward.
>
>Yep, I'm still here, but I had hell week last week, that's why I
>haven't been able to meet you in the linen closet.  I guess I'll have
>to make another attempt to be there for scheduled init., but you have
>to promise to be nice.

Giggles...define nice.

Tried to email from home, but got a bounce.

steve
--
harding@nas.nasa.gov (work)     steveh@cupertino.ca.us (play -- 408.252.0578)
              Prince trapped in the body of a dirty old man.
From: molly@uga.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re:Y&R : Scott's using little Scottie!
Date: 27 Jul 92 12:59:49 GMT
Reply-To: /dev/null
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens
Originator: nobody@nowhere

In article <1992Jul26.010532.10991@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> sthomas@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Sandra D Thomas) writes:
>In article <1992Jul25.194107.25440@cs.wayne.edu> faa@athena.cs.wayne.edu (Felicitas A. Atabong) writes:
>>When it comes to little Scottie, I'm on Lauren's side. There's been
>>continuous talk of how Scott has been wonderful allowing Lauren to get
>>to know her son. 
>
>and continues
>
>>Everything Scottie has been through. I'm beginning to think it's over
>>rated. Kids adjust to situations very fast, and it may have been
>>traumatic for Scottie to lose Sheila, but when we were young we used to
>>go to our aunts place for a weekend. Why can't Scott give Lauren a
>>weekend. It's not like people don't move either. What if Scott was
>>planning to move? Would he think it was traumatic for little Scottie.
>>I'm getting tired of this selfish doctor, using his son to get Lauren in
>>the sack!
>
>Actually, I think I'm the only person who defends Scott in this
>forum, so I'll jump in the role of devil's advocate for a bit.
>
No you are not.. I am also on Scott's side.  I don't like Lauren now and I hope
sheila will come and haunt her.  I cannot stand Lauren now.

molly
>Children go through the height of their separation anxiety around
>the age that Scotty is. If one of your parents died, and you were
>too young to understand what that really meant except that they
>went away and never came back, separation from your remaining
>parent might leave you very confused.
>
>I personally don't feel, and I don't think it is the writers' intent,
>to make Scott inot a bad guy.  His first motivation is his love for
>Scottie, that's why he didn't leave Sheila even when he realized that
>it was Lauren that he loved, and his life with Sheila was so miserable.
>He was even willing not to see Lauren again to placate the "mother" of
>his child.  Speaking of Scott's attitiude towards marriage,
>Scottie was why he married Sheila in the first place, remember? He's
>basically asking Lauren to do the same thing.
>Maybe his prior sacrifices of personal happiness leaves him unable to
>understand why Lauren wouldn't be able to do the same. 
>
>Scott is being overprotective in the case of Lauren's visitation,
>but his attitude is consistent with his prior behaviors.  I
>don't think Lauren is bad either (in regards to Scottie, not all the
>other shit she's doing with the adult men in her life), and it would
>be very wise for her to have legal rights to her son, but I think it
From: RMDELC01@ULKYVM.LOUISVILLE.EDU ("588-0803")
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL: Poll Message Eaten?
Date: 30 Jul 92 14:33:03 GMT


Hey guys, a while back (FRiday maybe?) I sent out a message
about my poll.  Basically I asked if anyone would mind my
sending a copy of their poll answers to TPTB (with all
identifying info deleted, of course).  I also asked if people
would be willing to send me demographic info for me to
include with the poll answers (cause we know how advertisers
feel about the demographic groupd most of us fall into)
I asked for age range, educational background, employment
and gender.  No one replied!  Did this post get eaten?
Or do y'all not care?  If you just don't care, just tell
me to shut up and I will...I just didn't know if my
message made it or not.  Okay, back to work.  (and no
smart remarks Timmy :-)  )

Polling Guava
From: KARENK@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: OLTL: Update for Friday, 7/24
Date: 27 Jul 92 18:46:33 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

I'll throw in my $.02 about the Tina/Cain/Alex great jewel heist...but I think
I've been fastforwarding too much myself!

I think Cain or Tina said that Alex WAS there in the janitor's closet and that
is where the doors were to lock behind her.   What I don't understand is how
that would prove that Alex tried to steal the jewels...OK, it would look
VERRRRRY suspicious if she was dressed in cleaning lady's clothes (knowing what
a clothes horse Alex is!), locked in the closet, but the jewels were supposed
to be left (by the door???) by Tina and Cain, and all suspicion then fall on
Alex as the thief.

While I enjoy Tina and Cain, and have loved "Carlo" reincarnated as Mortimer,
this whole jewel theft has left me cold.  IOAS, but this is really stretching
for a laugh...just IMHO.

If someone else can make more sense of the jewel heist, please jump in!!!

Karen
From: dias@milton.u.washington.edu (Vivian Dias)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: SB - SOS
Date: 29 Jul 92 18:20:53 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle


  My letters to SB Productions and Susan Lee are in the mail.  I couldn't
  resist zipping off something to Nicholas Walker also.  Especially after
  Tuesday's performance.  

  Just when I thought that Frank was down for the count he pulls another
  one out of his bag of tricks and has BJ thinking that she's the cause
  of problems between her parents.  This poor thing is a walking bundle
  of guilt complexes at this point.  #1 She thinks she's partially to blame 
  for the child abuse, #2 She's lost her job at the paper for not revealing
  her sources, and now, #3 She's the reason her parents are separated.
  It's going to take some major, heavy duty therapy to get her back on
  track.  I can't believe that Frank just undid all the good stuff that
  Cruz accomplished.  This is one sneaky dude.  Now, what do you suppose
  he has in store for our heroes trapped in the slaughterhouse?  Death
  by demolition?  

  Did anyone else start hurling objects at the tv when Rafe and Lisa came
  on?  Excuse me, but does Rafe really, really think this woman is going
  to make a fit mother?  What a little b*tch!  I don't like her, not even
  a little bit.  Pair her up with Rich and get rid of both of them.  So
  now Rafe is going to be driving for Ty and we're going to be seeing all
  kinds of Rafe driving Lilly around and denying his love for her because
  he has to be a father and a husband - GAG ME!!!!!!!!!  Oh well, I guess
  I need one story line to ff through.

  Write those letters gang.  

  Vivian
From: afpaeji@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (JIM PAE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: ATWT - Frantic's Past
Date: 23 Jul 92 18:15:00 GMT
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


Hey there Wardsters --

The battleship grey pills have destroyed my grey matter apparently either 
that or I was mugged in NYC and had to have emergency bRaIn SurGERy wherein 
they took out part of my temporal lobe to save the rest of me (All of me, 
why don't you take all of me?  Sorry ---).  You see, on Wednesday's show, 
Kimkabob and Frantic were discussing a guy named David Cummings (I believe) 
and how Frantic was in love with him when apparently he toyed with her mind 
and played her for a dupe.  Now, I have vague memories (All alone in the 
moonlight.  Has the moon lost her memory ... Sorry, again --) of this 
situation, but I can't recall the entire situation.  Therefore, I bow to 
the higher powers that be on this net, particularly JlJ for her vast 
knowledge base, and request the use of someone else's brain.  Could ya clue 
me in?  Danke.

tooTALL 
-------------------------+++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
Jim Pae                               A verbal agreement isn't worth the
afpaeji@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov          paper on which it is written!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps