HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bgarfink@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (beth diane garfinkel)
Subject: Yet another new party
Summary: Odo?
Keywords: science fiction
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 15:19:48 GMT


As long as we're having people run for president, why not have someone
run on an Odonian platform?  Better yet, 

		SHEVEK FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!!

(Alas, though, the president has to be born in the U.S. and he was born
on Anarres.  Good idea, though, huhh?)

						Beth
-- 
"Hold stick near center of its length.  Moisten pointed end in mouth.
Insert in tooth space, blunt end next to gum. Use gentle in-out motion."
From: afc@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: "I can even forgive Bush for Dan Quayle, but not for this."
Date: 2 Sep 92 09:28:53 -0500

In article <JASON.92Sep1124501@ab20.larc.nasa.gov>, jason@ab20.larc.nasa.gov (Jason Austin) writes:
> -> >
> 	I live on the coast of Virginia.  A few days is not long
> enough to organize an entire disaster relief system large enough to
> handle that level of destruction.  In order to handle an incident like
> this to the level people seem to expect would require millions (or
> more) dollars of yearly spending for something that will rarely be
> used.

This is exactly why FEMA was created.  It *has* a budget in the $100M/yr
range to organize an entire disaster relief system large enough to handle
that level of destruction.  Unfortunately that money seems to be being
used to support out of work political hacks.

> --
> Jason C. Austin
> j.c.austin@larc.nasa.gov
> 
A.F. Cockburn
From: DSTEPHEN@cmsa.gmr.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: alt.fan.eileen-simpson
Date: 26 Aug 92 13:21:08 GMT
Organization: GM Research Labs

Will nobody come to this fair damsel's defense?  Dhanesh, are you listening?


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Subject: Re: "Liberal" - A Misnomer
Originator: pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 23:30:30 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.152054.2050@wkuvx1.bitnet> barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
>
>PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT
>
>  Just in case anybody didn't get it, my two letters (Liberals... and
>Bush and Quayle Competency?) were meant to be facetious,
>argumentative, outspoken, and pretty much just generally obnoxious.

And stupid, and pointless, and fact free................

>Well, parts of them anyway.
>  I do support the Free Trade Act, I don't think Quayle's as stupid as
>everyone says he is (first off, it's just not possible he's lived 40
>years if he's _that_ dumb), etc.  Yes, I do think there are people out
>there wearing the name "liberal" who would rather tell you you're a
>narrow-minded bigot if you disagree with them (I've gotten letters
>from a few).  But I don't think liberals in general are the bogeymen.
>  In case anybody's interested, I'm thinking about making my ranting
>and raving a weekly (or twice-weekly) feature.  If I do, please send
>the shorter and/or dumber ones to me, rather than waste band width.

Oh goodie goodie goodie. I can't wait. I hope in the ones to follow,
you actually include some facts to back up your claims. And if your
rants are going to concern something other than Danno, take 'em to a
different group.

>
>  PS-I've heard from the liberals and one or two moderates; anybody
>agree with anything I've said (no smart remarks, please).

Sure, Pat Buchanan, Pat Robertson.............

>
>  That's my opinion - it ought to be yours. :) :) :) (get the point?)

No I don't. Please explain it to me. A bunch of :) don't excuse something
that is not funny. 

>
>                                 -Jeff (AKA Fred the Infamous)
>
>(yes, I know some of my letters are signed Fred; just don't ask!)


Patrick Pape
pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
From: llama@pooh.cc.utexas.edu (sine nomine)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Phil Gramm
Date: 2 Sep 92 23:54:26 GMT
Distribution: na
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

Bryan L. Allen (bryan@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov) wrote:
: In article <BPNFqB1w165w@fennec.sccsi.com> popec@fennec.sccsi.com (William C. Barwell) writes:
: >Eris Seiferman, (Aug 31), posts the thought that Danny Boy's main 
: >opponent in 96 will be Pat "Cultural Warfare" Buchanan. Soory to say this 
: >is wrong.  It will be Texas' own Senator Phil Gramm.  For those who don't 
: >know Gramm is one of the handful of Congresscritters that were Reagan 
: >Robots in 1980.  He was one of the true architecys of Reaganomics, and as 
: >dangerous a fool as you will find in the Congress.  Watch this guy.  He 
: >is creepy in a special way that only old time Phil Gramm watchers can 
: >really appreciate.
: 
: If his speech at the RepubConvention was any indicator, this guy
: has all the panache and popular appeal of an Andy Gump Pumper Truck.

in his senate campaign back when he opportunistically switched from
democrat to republican, gramm made a huge nonissue out of social
security and ran on the slogan "save momma's checks!" he was
incredibly successful with this in the dfw area, and i thought at the
time that he showed a reaganesque tendnecy to ignore questions about
inconsistencies in his record. and like reagan, he managed to get away
with it. gramm's a scaryweird *very* right-wing guy. don't
underestimate him.

--
sine nomine
debbie martinson
"--long enough and just so long/ will being pay the rent of seem/ and
genius please the talentgang/ and water most encourage flame" - cummings
From: dks@athena.mit.edu (dks)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The Dannikinsey Report is non-fiction.  REALLY!
Date: 30 Aug 92 10:40:42 GMT
Organization: The Dannikinsey Institute

In article <13555.2aa048f5@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>,
vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:
>In article <1992Aug29.221128.7386@athena.mit.edu>,
>dks@athena.mit.edu (dks) writes:
>>
>>         "Anyone who knows Dan Quayle knows that, given a choice
>>            between golf and sex, he'll choose golf every time."
>> 
>>                                      -- Mrs. Marilyn Quayle
>> 
>> The woman actually said it, and she was completely
>> sober at the time.  And she *was* talking about her One and Only.
>
>I can believe that she said it. But a REFERENCE would be handy. If you
>can find it please post it. Without a reference it is useless jibberish.
>WITH a reference it is undeniable proof and more ammunition :)


First of all, it *really* ticks me off that the Vice President of the
United States of America can get away with more useless gibberish than I can.

Anyway, I can't give you the most "undeniable proof" of all -- Marilyn isn't
returning my calls -- but I can offer the following excerpt:

  'On The Quayle Trail'

      Byline:   William Prochnau
      THE WASHINGTON POST Magazine, 01/14/90, p. 14.

  But perhaps the ultimate Quayle golf story involves his
  one brush with a juicy Washington sex scandal. On a Florida
  golfing holiday in 1980, he and two congressmen shared a town
  house with Paula Parkinson, a lobbyist who later posed nude
  for Playboy. One of the congressmen was defeated after
  charges he and Parkinson had had sexual relations. Quayle was
  absolved of any funny business. But his real extrication was
  handled by his wife with one of the most famous mixed
  messages in Washington lore. "Anyone who knows Dan Quayle,"
  Marilyn said, "knows that given a choice between golf and
  sex, he'll choose golf every time." End of incident.

If anyone is *really* interested, I suppose I could dig up the whole
article, for a nominal fee!


Dhanesh,
Dannikinsey Institute,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.
From: DSTEPHEN@cmsa.gmr.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Marilyn the Q
Date: 25 Aug 92 20:33:53 GMT
Organization: GM Research Labs

In article <1992Aug25.175053.11697@u.washington.edu>
sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) writes:
>
>Something about the DanMate puzzles me.  My (admittedly vague) memories
>of her from the 1988 election are of a somewhat articulate and
>aware person, of a nearly human demeanor and of a totally
>superior species to her husband.  Now she sounds like a
>transsexual Pat Buchannan.  Has she been cleansed of all
>humanity by the Republican handlers during the past four years,

Marilyn may have been stung by the abusive reviews her miserable spy thriller
got (Embrace the Serpent, which she co-authored with her lovely sister, for
you ignorant philistines out there).  This would also account in part for Our
Boy's suddenly virulent hatred of Hollywood and the Media Elite, although he
has received enough well-earned abuse to hate them anyway.
On a frightening note, I watched Mary's speech with the sound off and she
didn't look half bad to me.Does anybody have a set of used golf clubs I
can buy?
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: dks@athena.mit.edu (dks)
Subject: Re: "I can even forgive Bush for Dan Quayle, but not for this."
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 03:18:00 GMT

In article <MICHAEL.92Aug31162938@paul.bu.edu>,
Michael Chaplin writes about the "Hurricane Response" thread:
>The question is, what was this doing in alt.fan.dan-quayle ?

Fair question.  I posted the original article here because of
Marilyn Quayl's alleged role in Federal emergency-response planning.
I say "alleged role" because it isn't clear what she does besides
showing up at disasters and posing for pretty pictures.


Dhanesh

Maybe she's there to remind the victims that things can always get worse?

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: chesnutt@adobe.com (Stan Chesnutt)
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Organization: Tuesday Weld Fan Club
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 07:06:17 GMT

In article <92247.202316KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>>>  So what is going to happen to this thread when Dan is gone?  Who are we
>>>gonna laugh at?  Who is going to be the new Dan Quayle for the next 4
>>>years.
>
>Well, if the Democrats win, Gore is every bit as laughable as Quayle.
>If not more.
>

I think we'll have plenty of politicians to laugh at.  As a former Louisianian,
I don't know if I should laugh or cry about Edwin Edwards and David Duke.

"Tipper the Shrew and Hillary Too!"

-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Stan Chesnutt,  Adobe Systems			      chesnutt@mv.us.adobe.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Subject: Re: Dan's Kid Conceived Before Marriage?
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 01:22:09 GMT

afc@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu writes:
>> 
>>>An article about Dan in last week's NYT mention that he and Marilyn
>>>got married after dating just 10 weeks in 1974.  It also mentioned
>>>that his oldest kid is 18 years old.  I'm wondering if this was a
>>>shotgun wedding.  Does anyone know?  What are the dates of his wedding
>>>and his oldest kids birth?

Both marriage licenses and birth certificates are public records.
A phone call to the appropriate county recorded in Indiana should 
clear this up.  Any volunteers?
From: hans@Software.Mitel.COM (Hans Johnsen)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: More on Quayle vs. Abortion
Keywords: Quayles really pro-choice?
Date: 31 Aug 92 20:44:12 GMT
Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada.

sham@cs.arizona.edu (Shamim Zvonko Mohamed) writes:
>So does Dane really not know what "ban" and "illegal" mean?
         ^^^^

Hey! I take exception to this. Dan Quayl is definitely NOT a dane.
Or if he is, I'll have to start emphasizing the French half of my
heritage.
-- 
Take off all your clothes and walk down the street waving a machete
and firing an Uzi, and terrified citizens will phone the police and
report: "There's a naked person outside!" - Mike Nichols
From: elambert@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Eber Lambert)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: 2 Sep 92 18:05:58 GMT
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA

williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams) writes:

>From article <1992Sep1.225656.1526@nuchat.sccsi.com>, by lcypher@nuchat.sccsi.com (Louis Cypher):
>>>Mind you... if they do lose (which I doubt... *sigh*) do you realise we're
>>>going to have a VP arguably more intelligent than the president? Maybe we can
>>>start an alt.fan.tipper. That should be fun.
>>>
>>>anthony (not an american, and glad)
>>>--
>>>Anthony Hobbs             the Bard                hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz    
>> Well...latest poll results disagree with you.....
>> 
>> Clinton - 56%
>> 
>> Bush    - 36%
>> 
>> Leaving Clinton with a 20 point lead....
>> 


Polls are a tad scary. It depends on which poll you read and how the question is phrased. Example: Time magazine shows Clinton with a 6 point lead this week.

Go figure.

It aint over til the fat lady moves out.


eel
From: slarsen@copland.helios.nd.edu (susan larsen)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dan's Kid Conceived Before Marriage?
Date: 31 Aug 92 14:44:02 GMT
Organization: University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame

In article <Aug.28.09.41.00.1992.3911@gandalf.rutgers.edu> shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan) writes:
>slarsen@schumann.helios.nd.edu (susan larsen) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Aug25.205915.3530@beaver.cs.washington.edu> dbj@cs.washington.edu (Dave Johnson) writes:
>>>In article <sysmatt.714729758@aix3090b.uky.edu> sysmatt@aix3090b.uky.edu (Matt Simpson) writes:
>>>>zaccone@rigel.cs.bucknell.edu (Rick Zaccone) writes:
>
>
>>Hmmm, exam schedule?  Wouldn't that put the birth in April or May?
>>You know, the fourth or fifth month of 1974?
>
>It could have been Fall Exams.

Which would make the kid, today, seventeen years old as a 
matriculating freshman.  Plus, Marilyn strikes me as the 
kind of person who would be fanatical about taking her exams 
at the "usual" times (what, wait until December?  what will 
people think....shudder, shudder)

Sue Larsen
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dannikins MUST continue entertaining America
Date: 31 Aug 92 16:57:12 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <9208301532.AA16640@MIT.EDU> dks@MIT.EDU (dks) writes:
>
>Given all of these, it occurs to me that the perfect career for Our Boy
>would be for him to continue entertaining America each evening on a
>nationally broadcast game show.  A little more thought, however, reveals
>that neither "Wheel of Fortune" nor "Jeopardy" is particularly appropriate. 
>After all, it just doesn't seem likely that Dannikins could effectively
>replace Pat or Vanna or Alex.
>
>So, friends, we have to DESIGN A NEW PRIME-TIME GAME SHOW FOR DANNIKINS!
>
(in best RepubliCon tradition, criteria deleted)

Okay.

CONTESTANTS:  (1) rich white guy from one of our more fashionable
neighboorhoods, preferably from the midwest or south VS
(2) shabby representative of the unemployed or working poor, 
preferably minority, perferably unwed parent, preferably from
east or west coast.

MASTER OF CEREMONIES:  The Dandroid himself.

ANNOUNCER:  Either Charlton Heston or Tom Sellick.

THE PLAY:  (1) Each round begins with Dan-o stumbling through
a response to a question from the studio audience, or maybe
he repeats a platitude from a previous speech or press conference.
(2)  The contestants are posed a question based on Danny's 
speech, or maybe a question on an unrelated topic like 
bible quotations or trickle-down economic theory.
(3)  While the contestants devise their answers, enthusiastic
young men parade through the audience encouraging the
attendees to chant, in unison, conservatively correct slogans.
(4)  No matter what answers the contestants give, the rich
white guy is declared the winner. 

THE PRIZES:  An all-expense paid round of golf with Our Boy,
with transportation provided by US military aircraft;
followed by a dream date with Marilyn at her next
book signing appearance.

THE SHOW TITLE:  YOU CAN'T TOUCH US.
-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:3080 alt.politics.bush:3312
From: sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: I...RON...NEE
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 12:23:31 EDT
Organization: Monsoon Software, Inc.

garrett@Ingres.COM (QUOTE OF THE YEAR) writes:

> This is interesting. I knew Ronald "let's fire all the air-traffic controlers
> Reagan was a member of the actors guild, but I didn't know he was a LEADER
> of it. I seem to remember that around 86'-87' he crossed a picket line 
> of his OWN union. What an increadible sell-out!

There was a great book written in the '80's having to do with Reagan's
ascent to power being propelled by a group of Hollywood execs at MCA.
I *think* it was called "MCA, Ronald Reagan, and the Dark Side" or
something to that effect. Anyway, the book detailed how these execs
paid Reagan during his tenure as Chairman (?) of the Actor's Guild so
that he would campaign for policies favorable to the studios rather
than actors and also inform of "subversive" activities among actors.
Quite a guy, huh?


Sunil Gupta
Monsoon Software, Inc.
sg@monsoon.com
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:3253 alt.politics.bush:3723 alt.politics.clinton:3711
From: williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: "I can even forgive Bush for Dan Quayle, but not for this."
Date: 1 Sep 92 16:31:08 GMT
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

From article <JASON.92Aug31124754@ab20.larc.nasa.gov>, by jason@ab20.larc.nasa.gov (Jason Austin):
> 	I don't think you understand the magnitude what happened.  It
> was more than anyone would have expected and the system was just not
> prepared.  It's no ones fault when everyone's doing the best they can.
> A hindsight argument that Bush should have predicted this and prepared
> is ridiculous.  It's not even Bush's job to monitor each state's
> emergency preparedness.  This is just another liberal scam to take
> advantage of people's pain for political gain.
> --
We react to what we see reported.  What I heard was the head of emergency
preparedness in South Florida slagging the government for having their
thumbs up their butts.  Maybe SHE's one of those liberal scammers -- I don't
know. I thought Bush's reply was limp at best.

I hope your day job doesn't take up to much of your time -- if you decide
to become a Bush/Quayle apologist, you're going to have your hands full.
From: jberger@novell.com (John Berger)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dannikins MUST continue entertaining America
Date: 1 Sep 92 22:27:53 GMT
Organization: Novell, Inc.

In article <1992Sep1.151535.2512@ccu.umanitoba.ca> ejohnso@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Eric Johnson) writes:
>From: ejohnso@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Eric Johnson)
>Subject: Re: Dannikins MUST continue entertaining America
>SPONSOR: 	BUSH BURGER WORLD
>		You eat what we tell you to eat.
>		We do the cooking.
>		We do the cleaning.

We don't do the cleaning...we leave that to your grandchldren, too...

>		We do the ordering.
>		Leave your mind and your wallet at home, cuz
>			- We bill your grandchildren -
>
>		Sufficient sexual innuendo in the name to bring all those
>		repressed rightists out in droves. Sort of makes you wonder 
>		what the prize in the kiddie meal is.
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 20:23:16 EDT
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan

>>  So what is going to happen to this thread when Dan is gone?  Who are we
>>gonna laugh at?  Who is going to be the new Dan Quayle for the next 4
>>years.

Well, if the Democrats win, Gore is every bit as laughable as Quayle.
If not more.

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
From: mazzarel@spam.berkeley.edu (Ariel Mazzarelli)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Some rough comparisons
Followup-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Date: 26 Aug 1992 08:06:23 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Math. Department.
NNTP-Posting-Host: spam.berkeley.edu


Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar,  and studied at either Oxford or Cambridge.
George Bush,  a U.S. Senator's son,  played first base for Yale.

Gore was a good student,  was a dove,  and served voluntarily in the armed
forces as a reporter from the front.  He was also a U.S. Senator's son. 
Quayle managed to graduate from De Pauw University with a GPA of 2.16. 
On a 4 point scale.  He served in the National Guard,  which was considered
a cushy situation during the Vietnam War.  He found it helpful to mention
from time to time that his family owned the greatest newspaper circulation
in Indiana.


Hillary Clinton was a brilliant student at Yale Law School (did not play
baseball though).  She hung out with Bill since those days,  but didn't tie
the knot for about 4 years or so.  Marilyn Quayle married into a powerful
family via our man dan.  We are not sure here on the net whether she was
pregnant when she was married,  but she did manipulate the birth date of
her child in consideration of some upcoming exams.

Rather than contrast Barbara Bush and Tipper Gore,  I think there is an
obvious similarity about them.  Neither is particularly able to articulate
their voice in their party  (Barbara saying she's pro-choice?  Tipper telling
us to regulate the music of teenagers?).  So they are largely ignored.

Ariel
From: zaphod@bluemoon.rn.com (Peter Bierman)
Subject: Re: Depressing
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[024])
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 22:34:20 EDT

marvin@bluemoon.rn.com (Ben Scharp) writes:

> Well, I just all of the people who post here will be ready for Quayle 
> 1996! Scary thought but if Bush gets re-elected this November.....quite 
> scary. Time to get that VISA I think.

What's funny is that during the convention, Danny made reference in his 
speech to himself being a potential canidate in the 1994 election.
                                                    ^^^^
In what universe?


---
The opinions I express are rarely my own, because my own are far too
outragous to post here.

IntNet:zaphod@bluemoon.rn.com    FutureNet: #33@#10
The Metropolis (614)-846-1911
---
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Subject: Re: Quayle/Bush Competency?
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 18:17:49 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.164335.9938@ccu.umanitoba.ca> ejohnso@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Eric Johnson) writes:
>In <3444@ra.nrl.navy.mil> eric@tantalus.dell.com (Eric Youngdale) writes:
>
>>	Well, I for one would not mind having him take my order at McDonalds.
>								   ^^^^^^^^^^
>
>I second this as long as he sticks to McD's or some other place where you
>have no choice of what goes on your burger. Can you imagine the lineups 
>at Burger King or Wendy's while the managers fixed his screwups on orders
>with alternate toppings? Besides, it goes well with his lockstep mode of 
>thinking.

The perfect job for Dan-o would probably be courtesy clerk, the
person that patrols the dining room and refills everyone's soda
or coffee.  Of course, he would still need to apply his
astonishing intellect to the question of whether the customer's
glass is half-full or half-empty.

PS:  thanks to everyone for getting off of the abortion debate
and back to Dannish issues.

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
From: Frederick.A.Ringwald@dartmouth.edu (Frederick A. Ringwald)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Responses to Bush Massage at Convention
Date: 27 Aug 92 14:45:23 GMT
 <1992Aug25.033853.19402@ttinews.tti.com>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0d56@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <1992Aug25.033853.19402@ttinews.tti.com>
bsmart@bsmart.TTI.COM (Bob Smart) writes:

> Apparently, the closest we can come is that sometimes sushi will make
> them puke.  That only seems fair; they certainly can make ME puke.

My biggest disappointment about Bush's speech was that he didn't throw
up in the middle of it. Now THAT would have made it worth watching!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: unrzc7@daphne.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (THOMAS LUBANSKI)
Subject: Dan's a Democrat!
Organization: Rechenzentrum Erlangen
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 09:41:17 GMT


"What would Janna say about it?"