HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Hmmm... (Changing the rules)
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 15:54:14 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.041212.22021@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>What now Ed??  Bring out the EdLorian standard responses..
>1) "Why just yell at me, takes two to tango..."
>- yes, but it seems like you are always involved..
but it seems like you are always involved too...

>3) "Oh, who cares what they all think, they must be Celtics fans..."
>- the classic EdLorian response...
Nope, this time should be "all Buffalo fans...."

>Anyway, "bogus accusations"???  I have already shown the PROOF of your
>claims and contradictions, and you STILL try to deny it...  
Well, what PROOF is it? You have shown that I am applying a head-to-head
tie-breaker when the records are TIED, and that's changing the rules?

In other words, what you accused me of is:

1) not using the head-to-head tie-breaker when the records are NOT tied.
2) using head-to-head tie-breaker when the records are tied.

And that's PROOF that I am wrong? I sure am wrong, because I assumed you 
have at least a little common sense.

>Well, based
>on what I have seen, the general opinion is
>1) Ed, you're wrong now shut up...
I don't see any general opinion on your bogus accusation. I only see you
wimping out in my rebuttal to your bogus accusation, and also the
"hmm....." thread after Friday ....

And as far as the general opinion on SF and Buffalo, I don't see any
general opinion on your side either.


-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: fbrown@ssd.kodak.com (Frank Brown)
Subject: Re: Unabashed Super Bowl Thought
Organization: Eastman Kodak
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 18:09:13 GMT

In article <6190@ceylon.gte.com> chf0@harvey.gte.com (Curtis Fennell) writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.225841.4869@news.stolaf.edu> alvstad@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Joel D Alvstad) writes:
>>
>>QB--Jim Kelly for the Bills returned against Miami and played a good game.  I
>>didn't notice many mental lapses on his part, even though had had missed the
>>previous two and a half games.  
>
>I'm not so sure.  Kelly went 17-24 for 176 yards with 1 TD and 2 INTs.
>That is not very good for a SuperBowl QB, especially in a playoff game
>against an arch-rival.  And both interceptions were on poorly thrown
>balls.  This is despite the fact that Miami's pass rush could only
>produce one sack on the day.
>
>Also, given the field position that Buffalo had, they should have had
>4 or 5 TD's instead of just two.  Between Miami's inept offense and
>Buffalo's great defense, Kelly couldn't have been given any better
>opportunities, and he didn't really capitalize on them.
>
>Also, as I watched the game, a lot of Kelly's yardage should be
>credited to Thurmon Thomas running with the screen pass after catching
>ball.  
>
>I know that a lot of Buffalo fans believe that I bash Kelly because I
>hate the Bills.  I do hate the Bills, but I would *much* rather play the
>Bills with Kelly as the QB, rather than Frank Reich.  Kelly is much more
>likely to succumb to the pressure and make mistakes than Reich is. It
>is, perhaps, the one thing that James Kist and I agree on.
>
>Curt
>
You are so right in your analysis Curt. Kelly fans will say he was
rusty but he was playing that way the whole second half of the year.
Even the people in Buffalo who participated in the call in poll
picked Reich over Kelly at a 5-1 ratio. Kelly has been superb most
of his career but right now he just might be the weak link. I just
hope Marv has the courage to pull him if he is not getting the job
done. I mean jeez this is the game for all the marbles and you cant
let the team go down to keep from hurting someones ego. I know you're
a DOLFAN but you will be pulling for the Bills in this game wont ya?

:^)

Frank


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Re: Hmmm... (Changing the rules)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 19:33:19 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: VMARK Software, Inc.

In article <1993Jan21.212531.29160@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.181807.58782@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>>>in this thread.
>>Sure you did...
>Prove it.
>
>>>>You have a history of making up the rules and changing them to your liking.  
>>>You have any evidence on this accusation? I only know that you have a
>>>history of wimping out after long flame wars ...
>>
>>Sure, your claim of
>>"Yes, Meek, I did make up rules for comparsions,..."
>Of course, but I didn't make up rules "as he goes along", as Gary accused me
>of and YOU CONCURRED. I made up the rules at my initial involvement of this
>thread last November. In other words, you have NO EVIDENCE of me "making
>up the rules and changing them to my liking"

Ok Ed, you asked for proof that you change the rules...  Well, so far it seems
like you have tried to establish a few things here...

1) S.F. is better than Buffalo
2) This is because they have the better record.
3) Head-to-head matchups don't matter in determining this...

Ok... Well, I have something for you...  

Here is an excerpt of an argument between you and Mr. 49er, John Gloria.
You are argueing about who was better, the Eagles or 49ers...  And, you
are trying to say the Eagles were better than the 49ers, and the Bills
as well (better than the 49ers..)  Anyway, here is your little snippet of the
day...

(in reference to Eagles vs. 49ers, Bills vs. 49ers)

"Based on records, they aren't (as good)".  Based on head to head, they 
aren't,  Buffalo is better than S.F. ..."

So Ed, which is it??  Buffalo is better than S.F.. and you used the comment
about head-to-head as a method of comparison in your arguments as a valid
point.  Now, you say it isn't so.  You also having been knocking my use of
strength of schedule during the last week or so.. Yet, in this same article,
you state

"My observation is based on who the 49ers played too.  They didn't beat any
of the unbeaten/1-loss teams.  At least the Eagles beat two."  

Hey Ed, what's it matter??  According to your new rules, who they played 
doesn't matter, just their records..

Anyway Ed...  I think you should realize your mistake at this point...
How are you going to get out of this one???  What lies/mis-truths are
you going to fabricate??  Or, will you just quit posting in this group
like you did in rec.sport.basketball.pro???
-- 
David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kevinlu@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Kevin Lu)
Subject: Re: Most teams are passing too much
Organization: Monash University General Access Unix
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 03:21:42 GMT

David Shao (daveshao@leland.stanford.edu) wrote:

> One of the worst examples was this year's Seattle-Denver game on
> Monday night football.  The Denver Broncos had the game in hand
> with a rookie quarterback Tommy Maddox as their quarterback.  The
> Seattle offense had been totally nonexistent.  But the Broncos have
> Maddox throw a bomb on first down which was intercepted!  The
> momentum turned, and Seattle later tied the game with a touchdown on
> the last play of regulation time.  In the overtime period the Broncos
> had Maddox throw from his own endzone, and the game nearly ended on
> a non-called holding penalty.  After the game everyone said that
> Maddox is a bum, that he's worthless, a wasted draft pick.  The next
> week against Dallas he is forced to play in a rotating quarterback
> scheme.  Now let's be realistic here.  The kid is not even of the same
> age as a senior coming out of college, yet somehow he is supposed to
> run the offense like John Elway?  Why put him in situations that he
> simply isn't ready to handle, destroying his confidence and career?

Well, that would be Maddoxs' fault for leaving college so early (Plus
Denvers for picking someone so inexperienced). If he chose to leave early,
then he has to pay the price.

P.S Satish : I was actually hoping that the G' would get Reeves. Lets see
what he can do with an NFC East team!


Kevin
(Giants)
--
  +----------------------------------------+-------------------------------+
  |  Kevin Lu                              | Monash University             |
  |  Email: kevinlu@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au  | Clayton, Victoria             |
  |                                        | Australia                     |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jstripli@mailbox.fwrdc.rtsg.mot.com (Jeff R. Stripling)
Subject: Re: dallas over bills (You're Wrong too!)
Organization: Fort Worth Research and Development Center, Motorola, Inc.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 16:49:01 GMT

In article <C1IwDn.HwG@acsu.buffalo.edu> v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:
>
>If Dallas had their number two quarterback in a playoff game,
>I don't think they would win, ...
>
>Bruce, a Bills fan

What about last year when Dallas backup Steve Beurlien (sp) beat
Chicago in Chicago in a NFC wildcard game?

Granted, he didn't have to create THE GREATEST COMEBACK IN NFL
HISTORY, but he did win the game.

Jeff
jstripli@mot.com
From: kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: NFC superiority complex, Predictions, Menu.
Date: 27 Jan 93 04:34:02 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: UB

In article <1993Jan26.203329.15977@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> piz@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (G G ZIPFEL) writes:
>
>	I hate the Bills. I really hate the Bills. But, I sure hope they

Why? Because they are so good? Maybe because they beat your favorite team?

>	win, so that all the AFC bashers will quiet down, and maybe
>	the superiority complex that NFC fans have been displaying here
>	will vanish.

That will never vanish. If the Bills win, NFC backers will say the Bills
were lucky, and that the NFC will win it the next 10 years.

>
>	As for predictions: Dallas defense can't focus enough
>	to shut Bills down. Buffalo 28 Dallas 17. Half time B:10, D:7.
>
>
>	Note: I won't root for the Bills, but a Buffalo win would make

Nobody asked you to root for the Bills.

>	the net more enjoyable for me...
>
>
>	Menu: Rattlesnake Beer (Texas)
>              Chili (Texas)
>	      Buffalo wings (duh)
>	      Buffalo burgers (duh)
>
>
>	Serving: Wings during first half. Grilled buffalo burgers,
>	open faced on a thick slice of bread, topped with chili,
>	onions, and cheddar. Serve with outside temperature (-20 or so)
>	beer and enjoy 2nd half of game.
>
>
>-- 
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Zip   Steelers in 92!          | Illinois Basketball: More three point 
>      Bubby's Back!!!!         | shooters than you can shake a stick at!
>"I didn't lose, the Team lost" - Coach

Bills 24, Steeler 3, in Pittsburgh. Buffalo goes on in playoffs, Pittsburgh
goes home to play golf. That's too bad.

--Jim
From: mrn3@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MATTHEW R. NARBY)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Food bets
Date: 24 Jan 93 21:17:47 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <106273@netnews.upenn.edu>, satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) wri
tes:
>Hi,
>
>My friend tells me that the Mayors of Dallas and Buffalo have wagered
>food on the outcome of the Super Bowl?  Among the things being wagered
>are barbequed beef, fajitas, BBQ sauce, hand lotion, cereal and pecan
>pies.  Anyone else hear of this?
>
>satish nair
>giants
>
>
>
No, but I know that the Mayor of Buffalo and/or the County Exec of Eire
county, who actually are opponents of each other, usually bet on playoff
games. Also, I think you forgot one or two main ingredients of the bet:
Chicken Wings and Beef on Weck's. . . P.S. The breakfast of Champions is made
in Buffalo, Wheaties. Hopefully next monday we can say that the Cereal of
Champions is made in the City of Champions.
-- 
-Matthew Narby-
Buffalo BILLS
One Bills Drive
Orchard Park, N.Y.
Colors: Red, Blue and White
Rich Stadium
(80,020) NFL
From: mrn3@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MATTHEW R. NARBY)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills have to win SB
Date: 21 Jan 93 02:26:06 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University


In article <1497@fozzy.UUCP>, ckoontz@aud.alcatel.com writes:
>
>There is no doubt in my mind that the Bills will win the Super Bowl this
>year.  Not even the Oilers could lose three Super Bowls in a row.
Not even with a big lead.
>
>--
>Carl Koontz
>ckoontz@rdxsun40.aud.alcatel.com
>
-- 
-Matthew Narby-
Buffalo BILLS
One Bills Drive
Orchard Park, N.Y.
Colors: Red, Blue and White
Rich Stadium
(80,020) NFL
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: schmittj@sthelens.ee.umn.edu (Jonathan Schmitt)
Subject: Re: Trivia #6
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, EE dept.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 15:38:55 GMT

In <aoyoXB8w165w@dithots.Gwinnett.COM> gwp@dithots.Gwinnett.COM (George W. Pogue (Bill )) writes:


>  Question: How many footballs does the home team supply for an NFL game?     
>                    
>  I'll post the answer next week... if you can't wait, email me.

>  bill

>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Buy & Sell American When Possible!  <->  All Standard Disclaimers Do Apply!
> gwp@dithots.Gwinnett.COM  (George W. Pogue  (Bill ))
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is somewhere in the twenties.  I think it is 25.  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dnix@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Dan Nix)
Subject: Re: My thoughts on the Super Bowl...
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 15:20:36 GMT

v077mdph@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Snoopy) writes:


>	First, please excuse any misspellings, as my terminal program is
>screwed.

	And so is your logic!

>	I think Buffalo has the mental advantage in this game:
>		1.  Buffalo is determined.

	And Dallas isn't and just getting lucky?

>		2.  Buffalo ( especially Kelly and Thomas ) is humble.

	When the QB goes around saying that he wins the games, etc, etc, I
think NOT!  BTW (speaking of being nice guys), has anyone ever heard of 
Emmit, Troy, or Michael shoot off their mouth?


>		3.  Dallas is young and inexperienced.

	hmmm, 15-3, best defense, high-rated QB, RB, WR, and OL, I think
experience will not be a factor.

>	Those things, in my mind, give a definite edge to the Bills, but I
>think there are some other things they need to do.
>	The coaches have to find a way to stop Emmitt Smith.  I expect to see
>a lot of even fronts, with Talley or bennett lined up as stand-up ends.  That
>would give the Bills' defense good pursuit speed from both ends of the defensive
>line.  To stop the Dallas passing game, it is imperative to pressure Aikman, but
>it is even more important to take away Jay Novacek.  The Bills can do that
>by double covering him occassionally with the safeties.  It's risky, since Kelso
>is the last line of defense, but taking away Aikman's go-to guy and pressuring
>him in the pocket will force bad throws.

	Stop Emmit, you open up Harper, Irvin, Novacek, and KMart. Stop the
WR's and TE, you open up Emmit.

>	Offensively, Buffalo's task is simpler.  Use Thomas and Davis, even if
>Thomas is healthy.  This has become a proven one-two punch.  Also, take
>advantage of the fact that Dallas has never seen the no-huddle, and run it at
>break-neck velocity.  Doing this will take away the situational substitutions
>that Dallas' defense reiles on so heavily.

	The no-huddle worries me.  Dallas has such excellent coaching, and not
being able to use that play-by-play is a definate dis-advantage.


>	I don't think Levy will take my suggestions, but I'm confident the Bills
>staff will come up with a way to beat the Cowboy's.  Here's hoping it's a good
>game!

That is should!

>Snoopy


Nix.
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: THE BET III - REPOST OF FINAL ROSTER - DAY OF RECKONING APPROACHES!
Date: 26 Jan 93 18:55:36 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center

In article <1993Jan26.000416.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu>, f67709907@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin) writes...

>THE BET III approaches its climax with 46 rsfp-ers' posting privileges on
>the line this Sunday!  In the eternal thread over which conference is
>superior, these people made a decision in December, and stuck with it.
>Here are their names.
> 
>                               THE NFC BETTORS
[list deleted for brevity]

Conspicuous in his absence is Ed Lor who says the NFC Championship is 
the real SuperBowl.

JGH

"But that's your style of arguing: try to outlast the opponent no matter how
long it takes, just like myself. The only yardstick is who quits first. "
         - Ed Lor on the importance of a well constructed argument
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jmartin@ntmtv.UUCP (Jeff Martin)
Subject: Wanted: Super Bowl Tix
Originator: jmartin@cleomed
Reply-To: jmartin@ntmtv.UUCP (Jeff Martin)
Organization: Northern Telecom Inc, Mountain View, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:33:39 GMT

Title says it all. I'm looking for 2 SB tickets for
my own personal use. 

Jeff Martin
(214)684-1649
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: matjmm@gsusgi1.gsu.edu (J. Morgan Morris)
Subject: Re: Mike Saxon punting poorly 
Keywords: Super Bowl, Cowboys
Organization: Georgia State University
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:53:11 GMT

gil@dipl.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com(Baldemar Gil) writes:

>Mike Saxon has been punting very poorly recently (short punts,
>no hang time).  Anybody know why?

>-Baldemar Gil  (Lockheed Artificial Intelligence Center)


After the Atlanta Falcons game, I gave him a high five. The sheer
force of it rearranged his vertebrae, causing his hips and legs
to be misaligned.

As an honest answer, I don't know of any injuries...I think he's
just in a slump.

Later,
Morgan


-- 

John Morgan Morris
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
Georgia State University
University Plaza
Atlanta, GA. 30303-3083

Internet: matjmm@gsusgi1.gsu.edu
Telephone: (404) 651-2253
FAX: (404) 651-2246
From: martens@cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Aikman/Walsh controversy farce???
Date: 22 Jan 1993 11:41:32 -0500
Organization: Ohio State U. Dept. of Computer Science
NNTP-Posting-Host: python.cis.ohio-state.edu

In article <1993Jan21.201154.1401@altair.selu.edu> scsd1055@altair.selu.edu writes:



1) Most NFL scouts and press didn't consider Walsh worth a 1st
round pick.  Many didn't think he was ready for the NFL (mediocre
arm, no upper body strength) and should stay in college.

2) He had an ok, but not outstanding, rookie season.

3) The Cowboys were shopping him around.  The Saints were,
apparently, the high bidder.

I've never seen anything to suggest that Walsh will ever be worth
a 1st pick, let alone the #1 and #3 the Saints gave up.  It was a
bad trade for the Saints--this was pretty clear at the time, and
is very clear now.
-- 
      "C'mon, what's the big hold up?!  Let's go, up there!
		  Bring on the snow!"  -- Calvin

-- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)
From: felix@ocf.berkeley.edu (Felix Ling)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: NFC Championship Pop Quiz
Date: 22 Jan 1993 18:59:19 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
NNTP-Posting-Host: avalanche.berkeley.edu

In article <1993Jan22.071001.1537@netcom.com> nbh@netcom.com (N.B. Hedd) writes:
>felix@ocf.berkeley.edu (Felix Ling) writes:
>
[about the Niners-Giants 1990 playoff game]
>>Yes by (omigosh!) one point.  After Joe got knocked out, Young completed a
>>20 yard pass, then handed off to Roger Craig, who fumbled.  And yes, we ALL
>>know that if Joe had handed off the ball, Craig would have scored a touchdown
>>instead of fumbling.
>
>If Joe had been in the game, he would have completed a pass, negating the
>need to hand off in the first place.

Well, let's see.  Steve completed a 20 yard pass, and *that* didn't negate
the need to hand off.  Are you saying that if Joe had been in the game, the 
Niners would have kept passing until time ran out?

Against the Giants' secondary?  Shyeah, right!  (like he had SOOOO much
success against it that year)  Also remember, Joe threw 2 interceptions in
the playoffs against the Giants in 1987 and lost 49-3.  Don't tell me you
blame that loss on Kemp!

>Look, for those of you for whom this is real complicated, let me explain it
>again: Joe Montana has won four superbowls. Young has won squat. Furthermore,

Now get this straight.  JOE did not win 4 Superbowls.  The 49ERS won 4 
Superbowls.  Do you mean to tell me that you'd be willing to bet, right now,
that the team Montana starts for next year will win the Superbowl?  You 49er
fans need to learn that football is *not* a 1 man sport.  Teams *can* win
Superbowls with mediocre quarterbacks (Giants with Hoss, Skins with Rip).
Likewise, teams with very good quarterbacks *can* lose.

I feel sorry for Steve Young, but I really hope Bay Area fans drive him 
away.  They don't deserve him.

Felix Ling
--
   Pulaski walked to the Turboshaft doors, stepped in, and plummeted down
ninety-nine floors, yelling, "Dammit, Jean-Luc!  I'm a doctor, not a
skydiver!"  She landed with a resounding thump and croaked, "I've fallen,
and I can't get up!"
   "She's dead, Jean-Luc," announced Dr. Beverly Crusher.
				-excerpt from "Still Looking for Things"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Hmmm... (Changing the rules)
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 13:10:18 GMT

In article <C1A88w.K9y@hpuerca.atl.hp.com> krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes) writes:
>The bills are better than SF only because they are in the SB!
>
>How could you argue with that, that is why there is a SB. We could of course
>screw it up totally and let the "sports writers vote on it"
We have no choice. In a single-elimination playoff, the format is only supposed
to determine the best team, but not the 2nd best team. Any team that the
champion beats along the playoffs is a candidate of the 2nd best team.

>just like like college !
Actually college is better as far as the #2 - #N is concerned. At least there
is a ranked ordering of #2 - #N. 


-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: stavish@purch.Columbia.NCR.COM ()
Subject: Re: Superbowl Supertrivia
Organization: NCR Corp, E&M-Columbia, Columbia, SC
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 16:20:38 GMT

In article <1993Jan20.164806.19204@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> mk0e@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MAHEENDRA BABURAO KASMALKAR) writes:
>Now that Superbowl matchup is decided, it's time for useless trivia.
>
>1. It is the seventh straight time that the AFC is sending a `B' team to the
>SB. (Broncos,Bengals, Bills)
>
>2. For last 10 (may be 11) years at least one starting QB in the SB has his
>name starting with J. (including Joe Theismann, Joe Montana, John Elway, Jim
>McMahon, Jeff Hostetler, Jim Kelly)
>
>Now a question about batch of '83 QBs. Some commentator mentioned that the '83
>QBs are 0-7 on SBs. I know that Elway is 0-3, Jim Kelly 0-2 and Marino 0-1.
>But that makes it only 0-6. Who got the 7th loss?

I think it was the Patriots QB Kenny Easley.
>
>Bye
>Kassu
>-- 
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>!  My life in US :            !      Maheendra Kasmalkar         !
>!                             !      mk0e@lehigh.edu             !
>!  Apartment , Department     !      mk0e@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu      !
>!  Advisor and Budweiser      !      (215)-758-8081              !
>------------------------------------------------------------------


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro