HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman)
Subject: Re: HAM Friend harassed by police because of HAM equiptment
Organization: Computer Science Department,  Stanford University.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 20:05:57 GMT

In article <1992Sep11.134954.14062@hou.amoco.com> jim@n5ial.chi.il.us writes:
>In article <1992Sep10.220704.16657@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman) writes:
>>The US criminal justice system doesn't have on-line felony conviction
>>records, but it does have on-line arrest and contact info.
>
>yes, but unless I misunderstood what the original person I'd quoted was on
>about, he/she (don't recall) was saying that basically anytime you talk to
>a cop, you then have a record...meaning, if I go up to a cop and ask a
>question of some sort, I suddenly get written up as a trouble-maker....
>as far as I know, that sort of tactics doesn't happen here...at least, not
>legally.

Whether or not a record results depends on the officer.

It's quite legal; we expect them to keep records during investigations.

The problem is that they get to define investigations and they're
not required to end them or purge the records.

-andy
--
UUCP:    {arpa gateways, sun, decwrl, uunet, rutgers}!cs.stanford.edu!andy
ARPA:    andy@cs.stanford.edu
From: ag807@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steve Wolf)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
Subject: Re: HAM Friend harassed by police because of HAM equiptment
Date: 7 Sep 1992 17:46:07 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu


When your friend decided not to follow up on his beliefs, he
became as much a part of the problem as the original officer.

In Ohio, I would expect to be charged with the crime of
Possession of Criminal Tools should I use a scanner or
piece of ham radio gear in the commission of a crime.  I
would not expect to be stopped for possession of a radio.

73,
Steve, NO8M

--
From: willis@cs.tamu.edu (Willis Marti)
Subject: Re: HF STA Reps Candidate Info
Organization: Computer Science Dept., Texas A&M University
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 20:01:40 GMT

In article <508@arrl.org>, ehare@arrl.org (Ed Hare - KA1CV) writes:
|> In rec.radio.amateur.policy, willis@cs.tamu.edu (Willis Marti) writes:
|> 
|> >In article <7240@lib.tmc.edu>, jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
...
|> >|> This is a perfect example of how the ultimate decisions are made by elected
|> >|> Directors, and how the membership can (and does) make itself heard.
|> 
|> >If you think this is a 'perfect' example, then you probably believe Cromwell,
|> >the Wars of the Roses and the American Revolution are standard examples of
|> >the British government at work....
|> 
|> I really don't understand the analogy. It seems to me that those things
|> you cited are examples of how the actions of the British government could 
|> indeed be affected by those who wanted to make themselves heard. This seems
|> to be exactly the point Maynard was making. I am pleased that he pointed out 
|> that the actions of the League (the original decision by the Board of 
|> Directors) can indeed be influenced by strong action by concerned hams (time 
|> will tell in what way)

Egad, Ed!   I agree this shows that the ARRL " can indeed be influenced by
strong strong action by concerned hams", but the point is that strong
action can be *invited* as part of the decision making  process, or it can
be a 2x4 up side the head! {or pin through the antenna coax...}  The 'input'
came from people dissappointed with how the system worked.  No matter what
Mr. Hurder's *intentions* were, the QST survey *failed* to get an adequate
response.

My point is that the 'input gathering' process needs improvement.

Cheers,
 Willis n5szf
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: julichjh@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Joseph H Julicher)
Subject: Packet Package for Apple 2
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 17:51:33 GMT


Does anyone know of a place to ftp a apple 2 packet program?
This is to be used by WX3O to put up a station in Illinois.
Any info for apple 2 packet would be helpful. Send E-Mail to me for any  
answers.
TNX Joe Julicher
--
Joseph Julicher at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
julichjh@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

Computer Engineering Major
From: bj368@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mike E. Romano)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Real Cheapo Beginner
Date: 6 Sep 1992 05:41:19 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


  I have an older Radio Shack 1000 which is more or less IBM
 compatible...Radio Shack does not seem to have accessories
to set it up as packet radio...they do sell one short wave
transceiver (10 meter only) for about $250......I heard
from someone recently that I should be able to get
going with packet for a total of less than $300....So
I need a TNC or a used PK232?
Is there any mail order that sells this stuff used or
perhaps a newsgroup.
thanks.  oh yes I have a novice license.
-- 
            Mike Romano     Univ. Calif. Berkeley
Xref: sparky rec.radio.amateur.packet:2445 rec.radio.amateur.policy:1642
From: brian@ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet,rec.radio.amateur.policy
Subject: Re: Internet/Packet gateway policy?
Date: 16 Sep 1992 00:12:25 GMT
Organization: The Avant-Garde of the Now, Ltd.
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

The internet/packet gateway policy can be briefly and succinctly summed
up as

   1) the internet doesn't care
   2) it's your licence
			- Brian
From: coolguy@unkaphaed.UUCP (Guy Shechter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Intro to Packet?!
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 92 04:46:00 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy

I would like to enter the world of amateur radio.
I have an Icom 2SRA and an IBM, I would like to purchase a TNC that would 
be able to do VHF/ and HF, plus (not only Packet) but other things such 
as RTTY or Fax.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks. Guy N5URI
Coolguy@Unkaphaed.UUCP

--
coolguy@unkaphaed.UUCP (Guy Shechter)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, (713) 943-2728 in Houston, Texas
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: gratclif@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Gregory W Ratcliff)
Subject: Gateway Security??
Keywords: AX25 Gateway tcp/ip internet
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 05:32:51 GMT


There has been quite a bit of discussion concerning internet gateways.

What security methods (or lack of ) are being used to prevent people
from grabbing a known/heard callsign and then doing nasty things?

Most of the internet sites in Columbus are very cool when approached
about allowing gateway operation over radio.

Thanks Greg.



-- 
Gregory W. Ratcliff  Ratcliff.8@osu.edu  on the internet   
Columbus, Ohio     ICBM
nz8r@w8cqk 	 on the air
N1697X     	 in the air
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: ted@tedb.demon.co.uk (Edward Batts)
From: scol@scottsdale.az.stratus.com (Scott Colbath)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Question
Date: 15 Sep 92 12:55:14 GMT


Hi all,

	Sorry if this is not the place to post my question but it's a start.
I have a friend into ham radio who I think might be into this packet thing. The  
reason I think this is because once while I was at his home looking at all of  
his gear, I watched him turn on an old TV and do a couple of other things and  
when the TV warmed up, there was a message coming accross the screen he said  
was from another ham.

Q1) If this was a packet radio setup he had, how can I reach him? I do know his   
    call sign.

Q2) Assuming he is reachable, can it be done through internet?

Q3) If I am on the wrong newsgroup, could someone direct me to the correct one?

Please accept my apology for being ignorant on the subject, and thanks in  
advance for any information provided.
**********************************************************
Scott Colbath
Stratus Computer
Phoenix, Az.  (602)852-3106
Internet:scott_colbath@az.stratus.com
**********************************************************
From: AUBMD%asuacvax.BITNET@sds.sdsc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: KAM Documentaion / KPC-2400 Upgrade
Date: 13 Sep 92 00:27:43 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

KPC-2400 upgrade and Re: Kam documentation
Subject: KPC-2400 upgrade and Re: Kam documentation
 
> I just purchased a used KAM. The original owner got it with the
> version 2.85 ROM, and the documentation is all for version 2.85. It
> has been upgraded to version 4.0 but the only documentation for the
> upgrade that came along with it is a version 4.0 Update Cover Letter
> and replacement pages 30A - 30D for the Operations Manual. There seems
> to be a substantial amount of information missing -- there a quite a
> few commands listed in the Commands Manual that don't seem to exist
> and there are quite a few commands that appear on the Help listing
> which aren't documented in the manuals I have. Can anyone tell me if
> there is a version 3.0 manual set or update that I am missing, or
> refer me to some other source of info on the changes?
 
> Thanks and 73
 
> Al Woodhull, N1AW @ K1MEA.MA
> awoodhull@hamp.hampshire.edu
 
I had a similar experience when I upgraded my KPC-2400 from Rev 2.35
to Rev 2.85. When I installed the new PROM, my station wouldn't
connect to any other stations anymore. Then I found that many commands
had been removed, others added, and many of the rest changed somehow.
Most of these changes were not even mentioned in the addendum. I
reinstalled the old PROM, and wrote a letter to Kantronics describing
my experiences and to ask for a copy of the new command manual.
 
The reply stated that the addendum that came with the new PROM was
basically the changes to the Rev 2.70 manual (which I didn't have).
They did offer to sell me a current copy of the Installation,
Operations and Commands manuals as a set for $15, or about the same
price as the new PROMs. I was NOT pleased. I found another source for
the documents I needed.
 
That convinced me that the next time I upgrade, I'm going to find
another source for the PROMs and command manual. It's not that hard,
and would be a good deal cheaper.
 
This happened a few years ago, and I still get burned up about it.
I've not seen nor heard anything since to make me change my view.
 
I don't have the previous revision of the command manual. The TNC is
already installed, and I already know how it operates, so I don't need
the full set. Why can't venders like this just include the current
commands manual with the new PROM?
 
                     Are you listening Kantronics?
 
73 de Brett       PACKET: KA7CGB @ K7BUC.AZ.USA.NA
                  BITNET: AUBMD@ASUACVAX
                INTERNET: AUBMD@ACVAX.INRE.ASU.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: sam@wa4phy.ampr.org (Sam Drinkard)
Subject: Re: RFI problem
Keywords: RFI, Donut, Shield 
Reply-To: sam@wa4phy.nscf.org (Sam Drinkard)
Organization: Diversified Computer Services, Augusta, GA 
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 23:41:22 GMT

If all else fails, ignore what everybody says and what you read about
grounding and bonding, and disconnect them ALL.  I have found that 
sometimes, a poorly designed ground is worse than none, and with the 
design of the DVR 2-2 and Kam, there really isn't any.  The only other
solution would be to acquire some ferrite donuts, and get as many wraps
on the donut with the rs-233 AND audio cables.  If that fails to reduce
or eliminate it, sell the kam and buy a Tapr Clone (or a real tapr2) if
you can find one :-)  Of course, you couldn't play amtor/fax/whatever
else, but then a TNC is supposed to be for packet!

-- 
	Sam Drinkard		internet: sam@wa4phy.NSCF.Org
	WA4PHY			amprnet:  wa4phy@wa4phy.ampr.org
From: ddodell@stjhmc.fidonet.org (David Dodell)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Packet Gateway
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 07:16:48 mst
Organization: St. Joseph's Hospital/Medical Ctr, Phoenix, AZ

Sorry, for some reason the entire information on the gateway didn't post 
yesterday.

                    How to Use the wb7tpy.ampr.org
               Internet <-> Amateur Packet Radio Gateway


To send From Internet/Usenet/Bitnet/Fidonet to Packet:

Send email to "gate@wb7tpy.ampr.org" on Internet or "gate at 1:114/15" 
     on fidonet.

The first line of text must be:

Packet: user@callsign.hierchial.address

ie

Packet: wb7tpy@wb7tpy.az.usa.na

-----

To send From Packet to Internet/Usenet/Bitnet/Fidonet:

send email on packet to "gate@wb7tpy.az.usa.na"

The first line of text must be:

Internet: user@site.domain


Any questions can be sent to:

ddodell@stjhmc.fidonet.org (Internet)
wb7tpy@wb7tpy.az.usa.na (Packet)

--  
   -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Internet: ddodell@stjhmc.fidonet.org    FAX: +1 (602) 451-1165
      Bitnet: ATW1H @ ASUACAD                     FidoNet=> 1:114/15
                Amateur Packet ax25: wb7tpy@wb7tpy.az.usa.na
From: yau@cs.concordia.ca (Joseph K. K. Yau)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: What is packet radio?
Date: 7 Sep 92 06:28:32 GMT
Organization: Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec


Hi everyone,

I have been a Usenet news reader for 1 years now. During reading news from
other newsgroups, sometime I heard about packet radio but not in detail.
I have several questions about packet radio and what it can do. I hope 
some one from this newsgroup can give me an answer or point me to the FAQ
file. 

1) What is packet radio ?

2) Can someone use packet radio to read, or post Usenet news ?

3) What about email, telnet or rlogin ? Is it possible ?

4) What kind of equipment is need to get into packet radio ?
   IBM-PC ? DOS/UNIX ? MODEM ? RADIO ?

5) How much will it cost (minimun) ?

6) Where can I find a source for newsfeed ? Is there any money involve for
   newsfeed ?


I will finished my study at the university soon and then I will lost access
to Usenet. I am following alt.unix.bsd newsgroup and I don't want to loss
the access after finishing my study. 

7) I may move to Toronto or Montreal or Hong Kong. Is it possible to use
   packet radio to access newsgroup at these cities ? 

8) Please also point me to a FAQ as well.

Thanks!

-yau

yau@cs.concordia.ca
From: brian@ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: Shutdown protest??
Date: 5 Sep 92 14:19:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: network.18afkpINNgqj
Organization: The Avant-Garde of the Now, Ltd.
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

> There was a message on the local PBBS's that one of the groups in our area
> (Phoenix, AZ) is going to shut down all their BBS's, nodes, etc. over
> the Labor Day weekend to protest the ARRL position on unattended
> forwarding. They seem to think this will "send a strong message to the
> ARRL".

Golly, do you think anyone will even notice?  Messages traversing the
ham packet network often sit at a forwarding site for longer than that
in ordinary operation.

I mean, if people shut down forwarding for a MONTH, maybe we'd notice a
drop in traffic (mostly fewer 'radio for sale in New Jersey' notes),
but anything less than that isn't going to be noticed.

And by that time we'd have routed around the downed HF forwarders.

Not to say that HF forwarding isn't moving traffic - it does.  But like
a dog walking on its hind legs, it doesn't do it very well.  We really
need to come up with something better.
	- Brian
From: PS890866%BANUFS11.BITNET@pucc.princeton.edu
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: Packet-Radio Digest V92
Date: 8 Sep 1992 09:25:47 -0700
Organization: University of Antwerp - UFSIA - Computing Center
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

Hallo, can somebody email me information about software distribution by radioco
mmunication.  IBM is said to use sattelites for distributing it's software?  Yo
u can also mail it to me : Lode Goukens  Nachtegaalstraat 26 B-2060 Antwerp Bel
gium (phone 32 3 2268900) Thanks in advance.

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: bateman@nsslsun.nssl.uoknor.edu (Monte Bateman)
Subject: Packet BBS under UNIX ??
Originator: usenet@kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 23:46:01 GMT
Organization: National Severe Storms Laboratory

Anyone running a Packet BBS under UNIX ??

I have been running W0RLI's software under DOS/DesqView for 
about four years.  I would like to load UNIX on my 386
(Linux, specifically) but I don't want to have to take the
BBS down.  

Any words of advice from someone who is (or has) actually doing this?

Thanks!
Monte

--
===============================================================================
Monte Bateman, WB5RZX
Physics Ph.D. Candidate at The University of Oklahoma 
& The National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK! 

InterNet: bateman @ nsslsun.nssl.uoknor.edu
Packet Radio: WB5RZX @ WB5RZX.OK.USA.NOAM
From: CELLIS%BROCKVMA.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Baycom modem and TCP/IP
Date: 9 Sep 92 14:29:11 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

I found a file at UCSD.EDU called TFPCX.ZIP, under TCP/IP and BAYCOM.
The document with it is in German, and I unfortunately, am not fluent in German
but I am guessing that this is a TSR so make the Baycom modem appear to be
a TNC is KISS mode.  This would lead me to think that I could run TCP/IP,
with perhaps GRINOS, with the Baycom modem.  Does anyone out there know if
I am on the right track, or only wishfully thinking?  My configuration
for packet is currently a Baycom modem with Baycom 1.5, but I have been
looking at the GRINOS version (PA0GRI NOS) for TCP/IP.  Any helpers or
at leat clues would be appreciated. Thanks.
Carty Ellis KA2Y
Cellis at brockvma (bitnet)
cellis at brock1p  (bitnet)
From: tskelton@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Tom Skelton)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: 2400 baud modem for MFJ1274
Date: 14 Sep 92 13:25:30 GMT
Reply-To: tskelton@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Tom Skelton)
Distribution: na
Organization: NCR E&M CLEMSON Liberty, SC

A local friend is trying to get on packet/packetcluster (tm) and bought
an MFJ 1274 TNC.  I had told him to make sure the MFJ he bought was the
one that would operate at 2400 baud (1278 or 1274 T??), and he got the
wrong one. It appears that the stock 1274 needs an external modem to run
2400 baud. Any suggestions out there for external modems?
Thanks for your help!  73, Tom WB4IUX
******************** DX  IS  and  WILL  ALWAYS  BE *******************


-- 
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet,rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: btbg1194@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Bradley T Banko)
Subject: Internet/Packet gateway policy?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 06:35:37 GMT

What types of policy problems have Internet/Packet gateway operators had to
deal with so far?  I have heard some news on newsline about this within the
past year, but I wasn't paying close attention then.

Please respond by email and thanks for your comments.

Brad Banko
kb8cne@uiuc.edu
kb8cne@n9lnq.il.usa.na


-- 
Brad Banko;  Dept of Physics;  U of Illinois;  b-banko@uiuc.edu, KB8CNE
=========================================================================
	Tatiana Gutsu for President!
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: jt63597@ee.tut.fi (Tervo Vesa (OH3NWQ))
Subject: Re: Inspector for F6FBB bbs (M_FILTER)
Organization: Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland.
Date: 14 Sep 92 16:30:22


In article <JT63597.92Sep14161324@ampeeri.ee.tut.fi> jt63597@ee.tut.fi (Tervo Vesa (OH3NWQ)) writes:
>   Where you can find this programme:
>   ----------------------------------
>
>   Use anonymous FTP from nic.funet.fi
>   directory: pub/ham/packet/bbs/fbb/util
>   By the way the source code in Turbo Pascal 6.0 is included.

The right directory is :  pub/ham/packet/bbs/f6fbb/utils   
and the file name is   :  m_filter.lzh

73 de Wes (again)
--
----Disclaimer:--Tampere-a-place-in-Finland-where-everything-gets-tampered----
jt63597@uikku.ee.tut.fi     ,    oh3nwq@cc.tut.fi    ,     oh3nwq@nic.funet.fi
packet: OH3NWQ@OH3RBR.FIN.EU                 I use H instead of R in REJET.SYS

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: pgc@csadfa.cs.adfa.oz.au (Phil Clark)
Subject: Re: Packet Package for Apple 2
Organization: Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, Australia
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 22:08:05 GMT

From article <1992Sep8.175133.16689@cs.rose-hulman.edu>, by julichjh@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Joseph H Julicher):
> 
> Does anyone know of a place to ftp a apple 2 packet program?
> This is to be used by WX3O to put up a station in Illinois.
> Any info for apple 2 packet would be helpful. Send E-Mail to me for any  
> answers.

I am also interested in packet stuff to make use of my apple IIc. I would be
glad to hear of anything around that I could ftp (or even RE-TYPE!) to use
the old IIc.

Thanks to all out there.


Phil Clark [VK1PC]         Department of Computer Science,     Phone: 
                           Australian Defence Force Academy,   +61 6 268 8157
Email:                     Northcott Drive, Campbell,          Fax:
pgc@csadfa.cs.adfa.oz.au   Canberra, Australia, 2600.          +61 6 268 8581
From: kkrallis@LEON.NRCPS.ARIADNE-T.GR ("Dr.K.Krallis - Epsilon Software S.A.")
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: SAREX/STS-47 Kepler Question
Date: 8 Sep 92 15:36:21 GMT
Organization: NETWORK ARIADNE , NCSR DEMOCRITOS


  I am getting ready for a try to connect to Columbia (STS-47)
via packet radio. I use an old program to plot satellite
orbits, it's called GRAFTRAK II and requires CGA and 8087.

  When entering keplerian elements, it prompts for "Orbit Base" with
the options of "perigee" and "equator". Given that the orbit
is a low eccentricity one, which otpion should I use?

  I use the Keplerian elements published in Space News,
Sept. 7, 1992 by N5QWL and KK6YB.

  Please answer by e-mail only, to this address:

   kkrallis@leon.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr

as I have no regular access to Usenet News.

Thanks and 73

Costas Krallis  SV1XV

E-Mail:  kkrallis@leon.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr
Packet:  SV1XV @ SV1IW.ATH.GRC.EU
S-Mail:  P.O.Box 3066, GR-11364 Athens, GREECE
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: awoodhull@hamp.hampshire.edu
Subject: KAM documentation
Organization: Hampshire College
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 13:38:38 GMT

Subject: KAM documentation

I just purchased a used KAM. The original owner got it with the version
2.85 ROM, and the documentation is all for version 2.85. It has been
upgraded to version 4.0 but the only documentation for the upgrade that
came along with it is a version 4.0 Update Cover Letter and replacement 
pages 30A - 30D for the Operations Manual. There seems to be a
substantial amount of information missing -- there a quite a few
commands listed in the Commands Manual that don't seem to exist and
there are quite a few commands that appear on the Help listing which 
aren't documented in the manuals I have. Can anyone tell me if there is
a version 3.0 manual set or update that I am missing, or refer me to
some other source of info on the changes?

I would also like to hear from someone who has upgraded beyond version
4.0 (is 5.0 the latest version?) about what the current version does so
I can decide whether I want to pay to upgrade my unit.

Please reply by e-mail, I'll summarize to the net.

Thanks and 73

Al Woodhull, N1AW @ K1MEA.MA
awoodhull@hamp.hampshire.edu