HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: (no subject given!)

cc:u9177647@athmail1.causeway.q
b.ac.uk
Subject:Kate

--------
just a quick hello from a new
member.i'm a student in belfast
but i live in dublin most of
the rest of the time.home last
weekend to see davy spillane
and his band and according to
him he has just been working
with kate in dublin over the
last week......not too sure of
the outcome of the work or
wheither the sessions will be
used.....similarly members of
the hothouse flowers were
present as was donal lunny.

good luck and see u soon 

christian 
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Mon, 9 Nov 1992 23:21:13 EST
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 23:17:54 -0500
From: brenta@microsoft.COM
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <9211092019.aa26790@ingate.microsoft.COM>
From: brenta@microsoft.com (Brent Aliverti)
Subject: The Innocence Mission
Date: 10 Nov 92 02:12:13 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.
Distribution: local

In article <9211051821.AA12119@morgan.ucs.mun.ca> kirsten@morgan.ucs.mun.ca wrote:

Re: THE INNOCENCE MISSION

> 
> Hmmm.  Interesting.  I got this album as a review copy for the student paper
> here, and didn't like it at ALL.  I couldn't understand a word the singer was
> saying.  All the songs sounded the same, and all but one or two seemed 
> practically tuneless.
> 
> I'm a big fan of Tori, Sarah, Jane, and Kate, too.
> 
> Any other opinions?


Wow.  I have to strongly disagree.  I think this is definitely an album that
rewards repeated listenings.  I first got a cassette of this from a friend
who worked at a record store.  On first listen, I sort of dismissed them
as Kate Bush clones (the lead singer, Karen Perris, even has a look similar
to Kate (IMHO)).  Anyway, a couple weeks went by and something was nagging
at me to give it another chance, so I did.

I found their music to be very melodic.  Karen's vocals are sweet, but
never shrill.  Their guitars are somewhat folky, similar to the Sundays', but
more electric at times.  The lyrics seem very heartfelt, being introspective,
uplifting, and sad at that same time.  In particular, I found "Notebook" to be
a wonderful song.

Subtleties come out with repeated listens.  Songs that at first sound the same,
diverge.  (Incidentally, my first exposure to David Sylvian was "Secrets of the
Beehive".  I thought a lot of the songs sounded the same.  But again, with 
repeated listenings, subtle nuances come out that give each song it's own color.)

The (Innocence Mission) album is now out-of-print I believe, but I've seen some 
copies in cut-out racks for $6.99 CD (in the Seattle area, at least).

My advice is: Give it a listen and decide for yourself.


Brent Aliverti     brenta@microsoft.com
-- 
 

x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Mon, 9 Nov 1992 17:51:50 EST
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 17:48:01 -0500
From: PCP$2017@selu.edu
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Anyone like the Sundays?
Message-ID: <01GQYDQR82GI8WWMAH@vega.selu.edu>
From: pcp$2017@altair.selu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Anyone like the Sundays?
Date: 9 Nov 92 16:46:40 -0600
Organization: Southeastern Louisiana University
News-Moderator: Approval required for posting to rec.music.gaffa

Can anyone point me to a group that has the same type of sound and quality of
the Sundays?  I have both of their albums, and they are both good, but I want
more.

Thanks
Jeffrey 
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:15:36 EST
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:11:13 -0500
Subject: Re: Utah Saints
From: lionhart@netlink.cts.COM (Jackie Zucconi)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <ioN6TB4w165w@netlink.cts.com>
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

jondr@sco.COM (Desi The Three-Armed Wonder Comic) writes:

> I am not mailrus!gatech!eecom!wung@uunet.uu.net.  I didn't say:
> >I vaguely remember people talking about this group as they relate to Kate 
> >and I recently heard them on the local alternative station.  Any info on
> >them would be appreciated.
> 
> two guys from leeds.  they make poppish techno.  it's not very good.  they
> will be two hit wonders and then vanish off the face of the earth.
> 
> i saw the video for "something good" on MTV the other day.  it was something
> mediocre.
> 
> (on the other hand, last rave i was at, my friend and i kept singing the
> "ooooohhhI.." bit from "ooh I just know that..." back and forth at each
> other.  i don't know why.)
> 
> -- 
> Jon Drukman (God's personal DJ)                 uunet!sco!jondr   jondr@sco.c
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Why kill time when you can kill yourself?

Perhaps it had something to do with being at a Rave...it tends to make 
people do things they normally don't do......but then I always sing the 
ooh I part no matter what...I get strange stares from the family when I 
come out of the bathroom in the morning...just me silliness.
                     Kateness,
                           Lionheart

--                    
INTERNET:  lionhart@netlink.cts.com (Jackie Zucconi)
UUCP:   ...!ryptyde!netlink!lionhart
NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Sat, 14 Nov 1992 01:37:00 EST
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 01:33:54 -0500
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Kate/Sexual Orientation
Message-ID: <1992Nov14.063336.3167@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
	<17406.9211132148@daiches.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

In <17406.9211132148@daiches.cogsci.ed.ac.uk> rjc@cogsci.edinburgh.ac.UK writes:

>In article <1992Nov11.171030.22586@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>, andrew david simchik (ads) writes:

>ads> Reasons why gay/bi/les people are possibly more abundant among Katefans:

>ads> 1.)  Content.  Ever listen to mainstream music?  I try not to.
>ads> But note that there is *no place* for homosexual and bisexual
>ads> lyrics among the mainstream fare.

>Soft Cell.

>Frankie Goes to Holliwood.

>Cyndi Lauper.

>David Bowie.

>Right Said Fred.

>All of those are pretty damn mainstream.

>Ps. What amazes me is the lack of queer women on this subject. Maybe
>	they're just much quieter than the men, but that would
>	contradict all of my experience :-).

>--
>rjc@cogsci.ed.ac.uk				_O_
>						 |<

Queer women?  Check out the ones I mentioned: Sophie B. Hawkins, Madonna. 
If you consider the artists you named to be explicit, you might also think
about including k.d. lang.  Or Phranc.  And leaving the mainstream, there's
always a slew of bands in the alternative area.

Mainstream?  Bowie, sure.  Right Said Fred...um, I should have qualified
with "intelligent" music.  Cyndi...I admit I don't know her very well, but
if you mean "She Bop", I disagree.  That makes "Whip It" homoerotic.  I'll
give you Frankie, but then they were like Depeche, alternative crossovers. 
Soft Cell I know nothing about...can't be *that* mainstream, can they?

In any case, the only *truly* "mainstream" person you mentioned was Bowie,
and we always knew about him--same with Elton John.  But the original thrust
of my argument was that gay lyrics are a rare exception among popular music,
which is really really unusual considering the number of gbl musicians I
know.

Drewcifer
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Fri, 6 Nov 1992 14:34:26 EST
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 14:31:05 -0500
From: news@sco.COM (News admin)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
X-Mailer: SCO System V Mail (version 3.2)
Message-ID: <9211061128.aa21465@scorn.sco.COM>
From: jondr@sco.COM (Desi The Three-Armed Wonder Comic)
Subject: Re: Utah Saints
Reply-To: jondr@sco.com
Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 19:28:35 GMT


I am not mailrus!gatech!eecom!wung@uunet.uu.net.  I didn't say:
>I vaguely remember people talking about this group as they relate to Kate 
>and I recently heard them on the local alternative station.  Any info on
>them would be appreciated.

two guys from leeds.  they make poppish techno.  it's not very good.  they
will be two hit wonders and then vanish off the face of the earth.

i saw the video for "something good" on MTV the other day.  it was something
mediocre.

(on the other hand, last rave i was at, my friend and i kept singing the
"ooooohhhI.." bit from "ooh I just know that..." back and forth at each
other.  i don't know why.)

-- 
Jon Drukman (God's personal DJ)                 uunet!sco!jondr   jondr@sco.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why kill time when you can kill yourself?
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Fri, 13 Nov 1992 21:25:15 EST
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 20:04:09 -0500
Via: uk.ac.edinburgh.cogsci; Fri, 13 Nov 1992 21:49:45 +0000
From: rjc@cogsci.edinburgh.ac.UK
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <17406.9211132148@daiches.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Kate/Sexual Orientation
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

In article <1992Nov11.171030.22586@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>, andrew david simchik (ads) writes:

ads> Reasons why gay/bi/les people are possibly more abundant among Katefans:

ads> 1.)  Content.  Ever listen to mainstream music?  I try not to.
ads> But note that there is *no place* for homosexual and bisexual
ads> lyrics among the mainstream fare.

Soft Cell.

Frankie Goes to Holliwood.

Cyndi Lauper.

David Bowie.

Right Said Fred.

All of those are pretty damn mainstream.

Ps. What amazes me is the lack of queer women on this subject. Maybe
	they're just much quieter than the men, but that would
	contradict all of my experience :-).

--
rjc@cogsci.ed.ac.uk				_O_
						 |<
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:08:36 EST
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:05:39 -0500
Return-Path: <news@noc2.dccs.upenn.edu>
From: quaker!gerstel@vpbuild.vp.com
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: re: First Kate Experience
Message-ID: <1992Nov11.000516.1@quaker>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa


*I* certainly get chills when listening to "Night-Scented Stock".  Of course,
it always leaves me wanting MORE!!  Plus, wondering what on earth "Blow Away"
(the song "NSS" is derived from) has to do with "The Infant Kiss"???
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:01:35 EST
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:53:35 -0500
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Ticket off
Message-ID: <1992Nov11.215301.29501@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
X-Mailer: Fernmail 1.1
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

> Gosh (!) it's been quiet lately!  Why don't we all reminisce?  What was the 
> first KaTe song everybody heard and how/where did they hear it?  Of course
> maybe you've all gone over this before, in which case someone think of
> something else.
> 
> Andrea
> 

Ahhhh, I first saw Kate on the original airing of the Saturday Night
Live episode, singing _The_Man_with_the_Child_in_His_Eyes_. Blew me
away, visually and aurally! But I really didn't hear any more Kate at
all until one day, for no apparent reason, I bought the "On Stage" EP
with a few songs from Hammersmith. Still only listened to that
intermittently, then, again for no apparent reason, my wife picked up a
cassette copy of _Hounds_of_Love_  at a garage sale. We started
listening to it in the car on a cross country trip a little over a year
ago and bag, the hook was finally set We practically wore out that
tape, it probably got more mileage than the car going back and forth on
its spool (4000 mi for the car). Don't know why it took so long, but
She wouldn't leave me alone!

I still don't have all her albums -- I'm waiting until I can affor da CD
player until I start dumping money into new stuff. In a sense, it is
kind of nice, because there's still so much stuff I haven't heard
before.


---
scasterg@waltham.columbus.oh.us -- Stuart M. Castergine        ---
                I  still dream of Orgonon.                      |/
                                                                |\
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Fri, 6 Nov 1992 13:16:03 EST
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 12:36:49 -0500
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Ticked off
Message-ID: <1992Nov6.173557.7981@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

In <3q7sTB3w165w@netlink.cts.com> lionhart@netlink.cts.COM (Jackie Zucconi) writes:

>Ok, don't worry, I'm not going to flame anyone for a post....
>Back on Oct. 24 a woman came into our store and bought the KB box set 
>"This Woman's Work" plus a few other Kate items...later (this past week) 
>I found out that the credit card she used was stolen. This just makes me 
>hopping mad that someone (perhaps a Kate fan) would stoop so SO low as to 
>steal another's credit card, but to buy Kate on top if it is THE MOST 
>UNCOOL THING!!!! Sheesh...my faith in mankind goes down daily...Whether 
>you're a Kate fan or not, DON'T STEAL!!!!
>                     Kateness,
>                           Lionheart

>--                    
>INTERNET:  lionhart@netlink.cts.com (Jackie Zucconi)
>UUCP:   ...!ryptyde!netlink!lionhart
>NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115

Think of it this way: for a thief, at least she has good taste! :)

Drewcifer
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:54:10 EST
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:41:59 -0500
Message-ID: <9211112141.AA12155@relay1.UU.NET>
From: REWOICC%ERENJ.BITNET@pucc.Princeton.EDU (a virtual stranger)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject:      ran tan and the straight
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

eric.walker@channel1.com (Eric Walker) sez:
>     I've always felt that the gay/straight/Kate connection is completely
>     obvious.  My argument is as follows:

>     {logic del'd}

>     This may be a little idealistic, but it should get the point across.

a little?

anybody who thinks that rec.music.gaffa/love-hounds is a place of "tol-
erance, acceptance and recognition" must have missed out on the glory
days of love hounds's flamewars.

personally, i think that any relationship between orientation and KaTe
fandom is statistical fallout - the number of KaTefans is probably a
sufficiently large enough population to be representative of the people
in the world. i do think that there is something to the notion that
KaTefans might be less inclined to care about orientation. this could
explain why some people perceive there to be more bilaga fans than not,
but i find it a bit silly to go as far as to say that KaTefans are people
of "goodness, purity and righteousness," as eric so sweetly put it, and
thus more open to "alternative lifestyles."

woj
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 12 Nov 1992 18:55:40 EST
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 18:47:15 -0500
From: dmn2@lehigh.edu (DENNIS MICHAEL NOVOSEL)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Message-ID: <199211122346.AA55802@ns2.CC.Lehigh.EDU>
From: dmn2@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (DENNIS MICHAEL NOVOSEL)
Subject: THE WONDER STUFF
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 23:46:57 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

I was wondering if anyone out there was interested in a group known as the
Wonder Stuff. They are a british alternative group who in my opinion are quite
good. The thing is that everywhere I go no onee seems to know who they are.
Therefore I'm looking for some fans to shoot the breeze with about this
wonderful group.
                                     Dennis Novosel
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 12 Nov 1992 11:29:18 EST
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 11:20:19 -0500
From: stev0@sti.com (Steve Berlin)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Reminisce
Message-ID: <BxM2Ls.KD5@sti.com>
Organization: Software Transformation, Inc.
	<BxM0D7.H62@acsu.buffalo.edu>
Apparently-To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

In article <BxM0D7.H62@acsu.buffalo.edu> v115p8d6@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (she listens like her head's on fire..) writes:
>In article <9211121255.AA12504@perseus.cs.utwente.nl>, kortink@cs.utwente.nl (John Kortink) writes...
>> 
>>Andrea@hivnet.ubc.ca writes:
>> 
>>> Gosh (!) it's been quiet lately!  Why don't we all reminisce?  What was the 
>>> first KaTe song everybody heard and how/where did they hear it?
>> 
>>Nice question. Reminisce of this stuff is always nice.
>> 
>>It seems a lot of you folks are 'laters'. I picked up on her music when
>>TKI came out, and my brother (I wasn't buying records yet) continued to
>>follow her record releases. Wuthering Heights must have been my very
>>first 'contact'.
>
>'Laters'?! In 1978 I was still playing with legos!

Hey! I *STILL* play with lego!

>I didn't start listening to her until later, in secondary school, when we
>moved to a place that played a greater variety of music on the radio...
>and alot of British music. I got Hounds of Love when it was first released.
>
>
>this is in defence of all those who were too young to appreciate KB when
>she started out.:-)
>

Hey, no need to defend yourself - 'tis better to see the Light of All
that is Kateness late than never! (Am I sounding like IED yet?)

I've noticed most Non-American fans picked up on her right from the
start (ie, TKI).  However, while many American Katefans discovered her
then (I sheepishly raise my hand here), most discovered here through
The Hounds of Love-era stuff.

Now, what *I* think is interesting is that I've yet to hear of anyone
becoming a Katefan through what most of us consider to be here best
album - The Dreaming.

- Stev0 the ancient

"Me? I got turned on to Kate after hearing 'Fullhouse' "
	     - No one in the world, ever

________________________________________ ___I_`.*.'_B_ __________"I just know 
       Steve Berlin               .   K +  * .o   o.* `.`O +.   |that some-
       stev0@sti.com             '   *  . ' ' |\^/|  `. * .  *  |thing good 
 Thank you, America, for      (: May All Your  \V/  Good Dreams |is gonna 
voting for Clinton! We WON!   and Fine Wishes  /_\  Come True:) |happen!" -
============================================= _/ \_ ===========  Utah Saints
.sig (c) 1992 by Mike Jittlov [for all the protection that affords] 
.sig re-mixed by Stev0 (c) 1992 - Election Victory Mix.
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Sat, 14 Nov 1992 01:54:53 EST
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 01:49:06 -0500
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Ticket off
Message-ID: <1992Nov14.064852.3321@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
Subject: "It's in the trees!  It's coming!"
Organization: Morgan Stanley & Co., New York, NY
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

I apologize if this is a FAQ (or answer to a FAQ).  I'm not a reqular
subscriber to rec.music.gaffa, but I am a fan of Kate's, and I came
across something quite by accident that I thought other fans would
appreciate knowing, if they don't already.

I was watching a movie called CURSE OF THE DEMON (original British
title NIGHT OF THE DEMON).  It is a much better film than the title
would suggest, but I won't bore you with the plot.  About one hour
into the film, there is a scene of a seance, and the medium (one Mr.
Meek) cries out, "Look!  It's in the trees!  It's coming!  The Demon!"

The middle part of that quotation immeadiately caught my Kate-Tuned
brain, and I pulled out my copy of THE WHOLE STORY, and, sure enough,
the shouted lines at the beginning of "Hounds of Love" were clearly
lifted from this movie's soundtrack.

Just thought you'd like to know.


    "George Phblat's new film, 'Benji Saves the Universe,' has brought
    the word 'BAD' to new levels of badness.  Bad acting.  Bad effects.
    Bad everything.  This film just oozed rottenness from every bad
    scene...Simply bad beyond all infinite dimensions of possible
    badness.  Well maybe not that bad, but Lord, it wasn't good."
-- 
=Malcolm Austin==w:(212)703-6134==h:(914)633-3966==maus@fid.morgan.com=====
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Name this Kate tune
From: brenta@microsoft.com (Brent Aliverti)
Date: 04 Nov 92 06:34:45 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Wed, 4 Nov 1992 01:44:57 EST
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net

Greetings.  This is my first post, so I hope I don't muck things up too bad.

I have a Kate picture disc (vinyl) that has no liner notes whatsoever, so I
was wondering if one of you knowledgable Kate fans could help me out with
some info.  The picture is a head shot from one of the Hounds of Love
promotional posters.  The concert is a fairly well-known one (as Kate concerts
go), and features the "Another Day" duet with Peter Gabriel, as well as Peter
singing "Here Comes the Flood".  I assume it's a Christmas show, as it also
features "December Will Be Magic" as well as another more traditional 
Christmas song.  I can identify all the other tracks but one.  The song starts
with the line, "Where is she when the little thing cries", and the chorus goes
something like:

	Ohh. Ohh.
	Why did I ever go marry her?  I was a child.
	I'm holding the baby..(something)
	She saw me coming for miles.
	She saw me OPEN WIDE (?)

I hope that's enough to go on.  I was just curious if this is a Kate tune,
or a cover, and what the name is.  Also, I have the Cathy Demos #2-5 on
colored vinyl 7-inch...was wondering if these were ever compiled onto a
single CD? (Not that I'd ever be able to find it if one exists). 

Also, a few years ago, a band called "The Big Dish" released an album called
"Swimmer".  A friend at the time who was working in the record industry
told me that Kate sang backup vocals on a few tracks, but was not credited
on the album for reasons I now forget.  There ARE backup vocals that sound
like they could be her's, but I'm not convinced.  Any truth to this?

 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Brent Aliverti                                          brenta@microsoft.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Kate Bush * David Sylvian * Church * Not Drowning, Waving * Galaxie 500/Luna
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

p.s. I'm looking for some info on Bill Pritchard. Send e-mail.
      

-- 
 

x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Fri, 6 Nov 1992 00:23:18 EST
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 00:10:40 -0500
Subject: //// CLOUDBUSTING ANNOTATED LYRICS PART II (THE VIDEO) ////
From: rhill@netrun.cts.com (ronald hill)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Comments: Cloudbuster
Message-ID: <o3wsTB2w165w@netrun.cts.com>
Subject: Ran Tan and the Straight Issue
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa

Brent Aliverti wrote that Ran Tan Waltz was a B-side of a single he could
not remember.  Well, I know I have an import (from where I can't remember)
but the A-side on my 45 is Babooshka.  The sleeve has a really great pic
of Kate lying amongst crumpled paper next to a HUGE base.  The other side
has her holding an electric bass.  I whole heartedly agree, Brent, Ran Tan
is amazing!

On another issue:  I'll admit I'm probably a little over sensitive on this
but I can't BELIEVE we are even discussing the relationship between a person's
sexual preference and their love for Kate!  There is about as much a
relationship there as there is between a person's sexual preference and food
preferences!  I should also hope that Kate fans are both attracted by and
much more interested in her music than her admittedly fabulous looks.  Okay, 
I've said my peace.

Andrea
x-gateway: rodan.UU.NET from love-hounds to rec.music.gaffa; Thu, 12 Nov 1992 13:21:22 EST
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 13:14:38 -0500
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik)
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Reminisce
Message-ID: <1992Nov12.181358.23706@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>