From: temp@Saigon.ca (temp)
Subject: Re: [SHOW 3] Con cho ddien Long Nguyen Nhanlong
Reply-To: temp@Saigon.ca (temp)
Organization: UofC
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 21:16:14 GMT


In article <1992Aug14.212320.14640@news.media.mit.edu>, Kim Nguyen <kimtrong@ocf.Berkeley.EDU> writes:
>
>
>
>
>		thu*a anh long nguyen
>
>	a^'y che^'t anh long ddu*`ng no'i the^'. to^i chi?
>	du`ng tho* va(n loa`i cho' dde^? dda`m thoa.i vo*'i anh 
>	aka con cho' ddie^n lytrucviet -  ngu*o*`i to^i ha(`ng 
>	ngu*o*~ng mo^.. :-)
>	anh long ki'nh me^'n xem tho* xong "laughed a little bit"
>	cha(?ng ho'a ra anh tho^ng hie^?u ngo^n ngu*~ cu?a loa`i 
>	cho' ddie^n a` ? anh co`n hie^?u ba`i tho* cu?a con kiki
>	"is more like a joke" xem ra anh tho^ng minh cha(?ng ke'm 
>	chi ddo^`ng loa.i vo*'i chu'ng ro^`i !! :-)
>
>	va`i ha`ng phi'a du*o*'i, gia? lo*`i tha('c ma('c cu?a 
>	anh:
>

Xin lo^~i nhe :-)  Anh vie^'t ca'i gi` va^.y :-)  To^i nho+` con kiki
cu?a to^i translate du`m ne^n hie^?u mo^.t chu't te.o :-)))....

Cha` cha` .... anh co' the^? chi? du`m to^i anh ho.c ngo^n ngu+~ cho'
o+? dda^u ma` gio?i the^' ... co' the^? la`m tho+ ddu+o+.c nu+~a a` !
chi? tie^'c la` con kiki cu?a to^i kho^ng ddi ho.c ddu+o+.c tru+o+`ng
cho' na`o he^'t cho ne^n no' mu` chu+~ ... cha(?ng hie^?u he^'t nhu+~ng
y' gi` anh vie^'t be^n tre^n ... su+. thu+.c to^i cu~ng ra^'t ngu+o+~ng
mo^. anh la('m vi` ma^'y ai co' the^? vie^'t ddu+o+.c va` no'i ddu+o+.c
tie^'ng cho' nhu+ anh ... you really are smarter than my kiki ...

P.S.: ne^'u anh la` .... , just a thought, you could be a scientist dog.

>
>>
>>To Kim Nguyen,
>>
>>Your lastest action reminds me of TX who I despited.  So be ready
>>to take my beating.
>>
>>I fought TX on SCV to:
>>     1.  Establish a tradition not using person information to attack.
>>         (Mud sling, na(.c danh, vu kho^'ng, phi? bang')
>>
>>     2.  Straight out the illogic (TX logic).  Introduce new logic.
>>
>>     3.  Introduce new way of thinking, objectively not subjectively.  
>>         HOW (and WHY) is the word.
>>
>>     4.  etc...
>>
>>Every time I send a to SCV, I ask myself a question, "What is in it
>>for SCV?"
>>
>>Before I joined SCV, I have asked myself a question, "What is in it
>>for me to post SCV?"
>>
>>Your post bore no substance just a bunch of name calling.  I laughed
>>a little bit as I read poem which is more like a joke.  Is this your
>>way of contributing to SCV or/and just settling personal score?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>Tre^n ddo+`i kho' ma` hie^?u ddu+o+.c nhau!! Xong ne^'u
>>>>no'i tra('ng dden ra thi` nhie^`u khi no' kho^ng ddu+o+.c
>>>>hay ma^'y.
>
>>>>Nhu+ng ma` ke^.
>
>>>>Y' to^i muo^'n no'i la` "su+ cha" ca^.u dda^'y!!
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>
>>While other brother Vietnameses are trying to defend our mother land, you
>>chose to do this instead.  Shame on you.
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>To^i chu+a bao gio+` mo*? mie^.ng xin ddo^`ng tie^`n hoa(.c ba't
>>>>ga.o cu?a ca^.u hoa(.c ba^'t cu+' mo^.t ai ca? Ma` ca^.u co' cho
>>>>to^i ddu+o+.c ba't co+m hay mie^'ng nu+o+'c chu+a?  Ma` gio+` na^`y
>>>>ca^.u muo^'n da.y ddo+`i to^i !? Ca^.u cho' ma' vu+`a pha?i tho^i
>>>>nhe'....
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>
>>There is an idiom in Vietnamese for the act of doing dirty thing for 
>>nothing:  Ca^`m cu cho' ddai'.  Remember that?
>>
>
>------------------------------------------------
>>>>Tru+` phi ca^.u gio?i ca('n ca(.c to^i a^'y.
>	...
>>>>Mie^.ng co`n ho+i mu`i su+?a! Cho+' co' ba^`y 
>>>>dda(.t!!!
>------------------------------------------------
>
>>
>>Longan 
>>
>>P.S.  I wanna be a hyena, no dog.
>>
>
>
>	ba ca^u tra? lo*`i , cha('c anh cu~ng bie^'t 
>	tu*` dda^u ra ro^`i. chu'ng du`ng dde^? gia?
>	lo*`i anh, nghe cu~ng ho*.p ly' la('m !
>	ki'nh thu*a anh longnguyen, trong ngo^n ngu*~ va(n minh
>	loa`i cho' ngo^' co' ca'n, co' ca^u sau:
>		"qua^~u gu*` oa(~ng, ca(ng gu*` ca(ng"
>	kho?i ca^`n to^i di.ch sang tie^'ng ngu*o*`i la`:
>		"ma~ ta^`m ma~, ngu*u* ta^`m ngu*a" bo*?i 
>		the^' chu'ng binh nhau
>	anh cu~ng hie^?u chu*' ?? :-)
>
>
>best regard
>	
>
>
>=================================================================
>
>> 
>> 
>> cha`o anh lyxuan
>
>kimtrong@ocf,
>
>> 
>> to^i kho^ng da'm so sa'nh tri`nh ddo^. cu?a to^i
>> vo*'i tri`nh ddo^. cu?a anh. khi ra ddu*o*`ng, bi.
>> mo^.t con cho' ddie^n ru*o*.t theo ca('n su?a, to^i
>> se bo? ddi chu*' kho^ng bo` xuo^'ng ba(`ng bo^'n
>> cha^n dde^? su?a va` ca('n la.i !!
>
>Theo nhu+ ca^.u no'i thi` to^i la` cho' ddie^n....
>Va^.y thi` trong ba`i na^`y ca^.u dda? ddo'ng vai tro` gi`?
>
>Va` khi ca^.u la`m ba`i "reply to lyxuan" thi` ca^.u dda? 
>ddo'ng vai tro` gi`?
>
>Ne^'u ca^.u ddo.c ba`i "re: hoa` ho+.p ho`a gia?i" ma` ca?m
>tha^'y tu+. a'i vie^.c gi` thi` ca^.u cu+' no'i ra xem!!!
>
>Trong ba`i "re: hoa` ho+.p ho`a gia?i" to^i dda? va cha.m gi` 
>to+'i ca' nha^n ca^.u? Ha? !!???
>Ca^.u co' pha?i tha`nh pha^`n "cho^'ng co^.ng cu+.c ddoan"
>hay kho^ng ma` ca^.u pha?i tu+. ai' co+ chu+'???
>
>Ne^'u ca^.u la` tha`nh pha^`n "cho^'ng co^.ng cu+.c ddoan" thi`
>ca^.u ne^n ddi Ottawa ma` cho^'ng ddi! Ma` ca^.u la`m gi` ddu+o+.c
>chu'ng???  Ca^.u ca('n ca(.c chu'ng a` ??
>
>To^i chu+a bao gio+` mo+? mie^.ng xin ddo^`ng tie^`n hoa(.c ba't
>ga.o cu?a ca^.u hoa(.c ba^'t cu+' mo^.t ai ca? Ma` ca^.u co' cho
>to^i ddu+o+.c ba't co+m hay mie^'ng nu+o+'c chu+a?  Ma` gio+` na^`y
>ca^.u muo^'n da.y ddo+`i to^i !?  Ca^.u cho' ma' vu+`a pha?i tho^i
>nhe'....
>
>Co' gi` to^i no'i kho^ng ddu'ng thi` ca^.u cu+' vie^.c ba('t be? !!!
>
>Nhu+ng ne^n nho+', ne^'u ca^.u muo^'n chu+'ng minh to^i la^`m
>la^?n thi` ye^u ca^`u ddu+a ra ly' pha?i....
>
>> 
>> to^i nghi? tri`nh ddo^. cu?a anh va` to^i kho^ng
>> gio^'ng nhau, do ddo' to^i se ke^'t thu'c ca^u chuye^.n
>> cho' ddie^n ta.i dda^y. rie^ng ve^` pha^`n ho.c va(n
>> , anh ne^n ve^` nha` ho.c la.i ca^u :
>
>Hmmmm....Ca^.u gio?i tha^.t!? Ca^.u tho^ng manh la('m!!
>
>> 
>> "ddi vo*'i bu.t ma(.c a'o ca` sa, ddi vo*'i ma ma(.c
>> a'o gia^'y" chu*' kho^ng pha?i
>> 
>> "ddi vo*'i cha thi` ma(.c a'o dden, ddi vo*'i su* thi`
>> ma(.c a'o ca` sa, vv ..." nhu* anh vu*`a no'i.
>> 
>
>Tre^n ddo+`i kho' ma` hie^?u ddu+o+.c nhau!! Xong ne^'u
>no'i tra('ng dden ra thi` nhie^`u khi no' kho^ng ddu+o+.c 
>hay ma^'y.  
>
>Nhu+ng ma` ke^.
>
>Y' to^i muo^'n no'i la` "su+ cha" ca^.u dda^'y!!
>
>> chu'c anh ha.nh phu'c , vui ve?, va` so^'ng la^u !
>
>Tru+` phi ca^.u gio?i ca('n ca(.c to^i a^'y.
>
>HandsomeStranger
>
>> 
>> ===============================================================
>> 
>>> 
>>> cha`o anh lyxuan.
>> 
>> kimtrong@ocf,
>> 
>>> 
>>> vo*'i lo*`i le va` gio.ng ddie^.u trong ba`i vie^'t,
>> 
>> Cha('c ca^.u co' nghe qua " ddi vo+'i cha thi` ma(.c a'o dden, 
>> ddi vo+'i su+ thi` ma(.c a'o ca` sa, vv........"
>> 
>> The^' thi` cho to^i ma.o muo^.i ho?i ca^.u mo^.t ca^u nhe'!?
>> 
>> Ca^.u la` tha`nh pha^`n gi` na`o?
>> 
>>> ngu*o*`i ddo.c co' the^? dda'nh gia' con ngu*o*`i va`
>> 
>> Ca^.u co' ddu? tu+ ca'ch dde^? dda'nh gia' to^i u+ ?
>> 
>>> tri`nh ddo^. cu?a anh. 
>> 
>> Tri`nh ddo^.??? Cu?a ca^.u ddo ddu+o+.c ma^'y gang ? No'i thu+? xem na`o!?
>> 
>>> to^i khuye^n anh ne^n ve^` nha` ho.c la.i ca^u "tie^n
>> 
>> Ca^.u bie^'t le^? nghi?a u+ ?  Mie^.ng co`n ho+i mu`i su+?a! Cho+' co' ba^`y
>> dda(.t!!!
>> 
>>> ho.c le^, ha^.u ho.c va(n" cu?a o^ng ba` mi`nh.
>>> 
>> 
>> Ca^.u ne^n ve^` ho.c va(n ddi.
>> 
>> HandsomeStranger
>> 
>> 
>> -----------------lotta stuffs deleted---------------------------------------
>
>

Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese