From: jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. Schechner)
Subject: Re: The real Dan Quayle
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:41:36 GMT

In article <crb2.722101553@Ra.MsState.Edu> crb2@Ra.MsState.Edu (Chad R. Berthelson) writes:
>dejst5+@pitt.edu (David   E Joslin) writes:
>
>>htuttle@nyx.cs.du.edu (Harry Tuttle) writes:
>>>However, we probably agree on one point.  I, too, hope that Dan Quayl
>>>is back in 1996.  That would be a dreame come tru.  
>
>>Should we hope that Dan Quayle runs for president in 1996 because 
>>we could laugh at him a lot?  Or should we hope that he doesn't run,
>>because there might be a slim chance that he would win?
>
>>If the Republicans continue in 1996 with the agenda so nicely 
>>expounded by Pat Puke-cannon, should we hope that they nominate Dan
>>Quayle for president, so that they have the greatest possible
>>chance of losing?  Or should we hope that they nominate someone
>>competent, just in case they do win?
>
>I don't think you should hope for the incompetent (being safe..they
>have to lose), we republicans did that this year.  We thought surely
>that a draft-dodging adultering waffle king with a bad record on 
>raising taxes on the people of a small state that happens to rank
>about last in all positive measures would be a sure thing for us.
>I actually worried that Paul Songass (sp?) would get nominated and
>give us a run for the money.  Don't underestimate the gullability
>and naivity of the voter.
>
>Chad

	Chad, can I safely assume that you believe Elivis is alive and
living in my local K-mart?  And you must also believe that your cat is
_far_ smarter than you are (not much, of an accomplishment, I know),
and it must be one of your cannon views that aliens(tm) conroll every
facet of our lives.  
	Where does this come from, he asks?  All of these stories were
run by the same 'paper' that broke the Jennifer Flowers story:  The
national Enquirer.  It was then picked up by the New York Times
without any more 'research'.  It might also interest you to know that
the Enquirer paid her $25,000 to "tell"  her story.  
	"Draft doging"?  At least what Clinton did was legal.  Quayle
had some behind-the-scenes string-pulling done.  Another major
difference here is that Clinton was against the war and did everything
he could to get out of it.  I find that admirable and full of
character(tm):  Standing up for what you believe in.  Dannikins, on
the other hand was _for_ the war, but did everything to weasel his way
out of fighting in it.
	Lastly:  Arkansas has the second lowest tax burden,
per-capita, of any state in the country.  And you call that a BAD tax
record?  Then I guess the invention of the microchip was a horrible
attrocity!  Arkansas also has consistently had a job growth of up to 5
times the national average.  Another _terrible_ statistic.  
	No, I don't expect you to change your views based on my post,
but I would at least nope that you will have a somewhat open mind and
not just swallow party rhetoric hook, line, and sinker.  But if you
did that, you'd probably be a Democrat, now wouldn't you?
	BTW:  WHO CARES???  CLINTON WON.  BUSH LOST.  FACE IT.  DON'T
BE SUCH A SORE LOOSER.  TAKE YOUR HERO'S ADVICE AND DEAL WITH IT!
	(God, I love doing that).

>>ObQuayleRumor:  The Indiana paper run by Quayle's family is beginning
>>to increase its inventory of the letter 'e' just in case Quayle returns.
>
>>David
>>Anagram: Presiddent Dan Quuaaiyl ==> End USA Quality and Pride.

	He's been working on it, as hard as he can.
>
>--
>
>Chad R. Berthelson		Graduate Research/Teaching Assistant
>crb2@ra.msstate.edu		Biological Engineering
>cberth@abe.msstate.edu		Mississippi State University

-Jason

-- 
"I sneak in my own house... it's 4 in the morning... I've had too much to 
drink... said I was out with the boys... I sneak in my bedroom... slip 
into bed... I know if I wake her, I'll wake up.... DEAD!"
   							-Dave Mustaine