HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Envelope-to: win3-l@UICVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"win3-l@uicvm"
X-VMS-Cc: STENDAHL_S
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 12:22:00 PST
From:         "Svend G. Stendahl, PLU, Tacoma,
              WA; (206) 535-7011" <STENDAHL_S@PLU.BITNET>
Subject:      Hint for those who installed W4W 2.0/a under Win3.0 and now using
              Win3.1

Hi WIN3-L!

        Hint for those who use the Equation Writer (Math Type) in W4W 2.0(a)
and installed it under Win3.0 and are now using Win3.1 (puh!):

        The Equation Writer uses two special fonts called FENCES and MT EXTRA.
When you installed it under Win3.0 these are installed as non-scaleable
Windows fonts. The print-quality is therefore not the best...
        If you re-install the Equation Writer (use Custom Setup) under Win3.1
the setup-program installes these fonts as TrueType fonts instead and you get
better print-quality!

-- Have an awesome weekend!

                         ##################################
                        +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++##
                        + Svend G. Stendahl             +##
                        + Pacific Lutheran University   +##
                        + Tacoma, Washington, USA       +##
                        +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++##
                        + Bitnet: STENDAHL_S@PLU.BITNET +##
                        +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++##
                        +          HEIA NORGE!          +##
                        +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"WIN3-L@UICVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Fri, 17 Apr 1992 07:34:00 EST
From:         LINDA@NORTHEASTERN.EDU
Subject:      Re: TrueType Fonts

I have installed fonts from TTFONT1.ZIP and TTFONTS2.ZIP with no problems.

Doug Hanson
From: lijewski@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (K.M.Lijewski)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: smartdrv.sys
Date: 8 Apr 92 14:15:00 GMT
Organization: UB


	An interesting thing happened when I got my 33mz 386 esia. I tested
the drive access time (using bench 6.0) and found my drive to be extremely
slow compared to a friend with the same machine. It turned out that smartdrv.
sys actually slows down a fast drive, such as a EDSI, which I have.

	Dos access using smartdrv.sys = 63.xx ms
	Dos access w/o smartdrv.sys   = 19.xx ms

	It also affected the disk-bios speeds, but not by a factor of three, 
as it did with Dos access. 
	This is something you might want to try yourself. I called Seagate,
the mfgr of the ESDI drive, and they confirmed that you should not use
smartdrv with an ESDI drive!
		Kevin (lijewski@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu)  
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: WIN3-L@UICVM
X-VMS-To: BITNET%"WIN3-L@UICVM"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 09:01:00 GMT
From:         Vincent D'Haeyere <INFSTDDHAEY@BNANDP51.BITNET>
Subject:      Solution for lost fonts in Word for Windows 2.0

Hi netters,

   In a previous posting, I described a fix for lost fonts in the Equation
Editor. Here it is again !

   Go into the Control Panel. Delete the MT fonts that the Equation Editor says
are not present or correct. (* Do not remove them from disk as it is possible wi
   th a switch in the dialog box *). Then add these fonts to the list of availab
   le fonts.

   Now, it should be right. Restart Word for Windows and launch the Equation Edi
   tor (if all is right, you should not see any error messages). If you see an
error message, try to restart Windows.

   This trick worked for me. I hope it will for all of you who are craving for
a decent equation editor !


   See you soon in Netland,

                             Vincent D'Haeyere
                             Bitnet : infstddhaey@bnandp51
From: carter@cemvax.cem.msu.edu (Tom Carter)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: I need PCSOUND.DRV for Win 3.1, please
Date: 9 Apr 92 12:27:12 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University, East Lansing Michigan

Can anyone send me the PCSOUND.DRV driver for WIN 3.1
which allows the multimedia sound effects to be used
without a sound card?  Someone posted that it was available
from MS on their BB, but I don't have access to a modem.

UUENCODED would be nice, or you can ftp it to me as "anonymous ftp"
at photon.cem.msu.edu.

BTW, check out the (DOS) program "MSD" which shipped with WIN 3.1!
Tells you lots about your system.

TIA.


================================================================================
|   Tom Carter                          |         carter@cemvax.cem.msu.edu    |
|   Michigan State University           |         carter@msucem.bitnet         |
|   Chemistry Department                |                                      |
================================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 19:27:56 PDT
From:         "Vance M. Gloster" <gloster@INFERENCE.COM>
Subject:      Windows 3.1 vs Windows NT
X-To:         WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
X-cc:         johnsond@moeng.towson.edu

The Legend of NT (as rumored among self-described insiders) goes
something like this:

There was the original OS/2 version 1 which Microsoft wrote the
operating system for, and IBM wrote the windowing system for.  The
plan was that (like DOS) Microsoft and IBM would do alternate releases
(Microsoft did DOS 3 and 5, IBM did DOS 4) with IBM doing OS/2 version
2, and Microsoft doing OS/2 version 3.  Microsoft had intended OS/2
version 3 to be *platform-independant* like UNIX with the vast
majority of the code written in C.  The schedule for OS/2 version 2
from IBM lagged, whereas version 3 was on schedule.  It looked as if
IBM would only have 6-9 months between the release of OS/2 version 2
and OS/2 version 3 (not nearly enough time to make back their
investment in version 2).  Microsoft also was choosing a RISC
processor to initially implement OS/2 version 3 on, and instead of
choosing IBM's processor (the one in IBM's RS6000 machines) they chose
the MIPS 5000 processor (soon to be found in DEC and Silicon Graphics
workstations).  With these tensions on their relationship there was a
parting of the ways.  Microsoft decided to take their OS/2 version 3
operating system, throw away PM (getting IBM out of the picture), add
a 32-bit version of the Windows windowing system, and call it Windows
NT (for New Technology).

The preceding may be partially or completely untrue, but I don't think
so.  Windows NT has all the nice features of OS/2 (threads, bezier
curves, a high-performance file system, preemptive multitasking,
separate address spaces, DOS emulation, 16-bit Windows emulation)
which will seem eerily familiar to an OS/2 programmer.  It has most of
the features that were announced as future enhancements of OS/2 by
Microsoft (symmetric multiprocessing, 32-bit windowing system, native
32-bit programs, cross-platform portability).  Everybody is right, the
future of computing is OS/2 and its name is Windows.

Windows NT will run on 386SX or better machines instead of DOS, not on
top of DOS.  It will also run on symmetric multiprocessing machines
(with multiple 386/486s), and Advanced Computing Environment machines
based on the MIPS 5000 chip.  You can run DOS and Windows 3.0 programs
even on the ACE machines under Windows NT.

ACE machines will be available from numerous vendors (including
Compaq, Olivetti, and DEC) toward the end of the year.  All except the
DEC ones will have a standard EISA bus.  Windows NT will be
commercially available in the same time frame.

-Vance Gloster
 gloster@inference.com
Xref: sparky bit.listserv.win3-l:3866 comp.windows.ms:12589
From: carter@cemvax.cem.msu.edu (Tom Carter)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l,comp.windows.ms
Subject: I need updated drivers for Diamond SpeedStar Plus fo Win 3.1
Date: 13 Apr 92 21:43:00 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University, East Lansing Michigan

Can anyone tell me where I can get the updated drivers for Diamond SpeedStar 
Plus (which came with my Gateway 433C) without using a modem?  Any help 
will be appreciated!



================================================================================
|   Tom Carter                          |         carter@cemvax.cem.msu.edu    |
|   Michigan State University           |         carter@msucem.bitnet         |
|   Chemistry Department                |                                      |
================================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 13:12:24 -0500
From:         CA6732@SIUCVMB.BITNET
Subject:      Pigged off Microsoft User!

 *** Reply to note of 04/08/92 11:44
 *****               John Buijk              *****
 ***** Micro-Computer Software Specialist II *****
 *****   Computing Affairs, Wham, 453-6149   *****
 Maybe they also have slow computers in your country... I just saw OS2 2.0
 at Comdex/Windows World in Chicago and it ran reasonably fast on 386 and
 486 machines.

 John

 P.S. Win 3.0 ran reasonably fast also!

 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 -=  JOHN BUIJK - SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY AT CARBONDALE -=
 =-  CA6732@SIUCVMB.BITNET - SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU - 131.230.1.2   =-
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 18:06:00 EDT
From:         Vince Scarafino <Scarafino@MULTICS-A.PMS.FORD.COM>
Subject:      Re: Reply to Re: Windows 3.1 vs Windows NT
X-To:         Microsoft Windows Version 3 Forum
              <WIN3-L%UICVM.BITNET@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
              CYBER.WIDENER.EDU"

 >Date:  7 April 1992 16:58 edt
 >From:  Scott.R.Barnett at CYBER.WIDENER.EDU
 >Subject:  Reply to Re: Windows 3.1 vs Windows NT

 >Is Windows NT going to be a stand alone operating system or will you need to
 >run a separate operating system (eg. DOS, UNIX) underneath it?
 >
 >Scott Barnett
 >PYSRBARNETT@CYBER.WIDENER.EDU

Windows NT will be a stand along operating system (almost a hypervisor)
capable of supporting multiple environments simultaneously.

Vince
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
From: mikelle@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu (Eddie Mikell)
Subject: WinQVT, windows 3.1, and the new ipx.obj
Keywords: Lock - up
Organization: Darden Center, University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 13:17:35 GMT

I have generated the news IPX.com with the ipx.obj included with Windows 3.1
and have run into an interesting problem.

If I use the new IPX to log onto a server, run windows, and then try to run 
WinQVT, my machine will halt, and requires a hard reset.  If I run the old 
IPX.com, WinQVT works fine.....

Anyone else had this problem?

Thanks,

Eddie Mikell
mikelle@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 14:39:52 -0600
From:         GE0095@SIUCVMB.BITNET
Subject:      Excel 4.0

 *** Reply to note of 04/06/92 11:26
 Microsoft told me that they would begin shipping it this week, because it
 requires Windows 3.1.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.win3-l
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:17:58 MDT
From:         Manabu Asano <asano@XI.ULETH.CA>
Subject:      Re: Mouse Problems
X-To:         win3-l@uicvm.uic.edu

>I've never had this problem on my IBM mouse, but this happens frequently
>on my Macintosh mouse.  Taking the mouse apart and cleaning it solves
>the problem.

I should have mentioned that the cleaning the mouse does not solve the
problem because the mouse pointer jumps around even though I don't touch
it...  Any idea?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
Original_cc:  FEDERMAN
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 11:13:00 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "ALAN N. FEDERMAN,
              COORDINATOR OF ACADEMIC COMPUTING" <FEDERMAN@IPFWCVAX.BITNET>
Subject:      RE: Problem with Windows 3.0 and Netware 386 3.11

You mentioned that you had set the EMMexclude parameter, but did not mention
the SetROMBreakPoint=  parameter (should be set false.

Also, you may have problems if QEMM is loading something high in an
area the windows needs in enchanced mode. Loading Files high is an example

Other things to try that seem to help:

Try loading the windows workstation kit - WINUP5 is available from Splicer.

Try using the ODI stacks instead of the IPX - NETX route.


BTW  Windows 3.1 and QEMM 6.0 are supposed to work fine together, by
using  WIN/D:X   - haven't tried this yet since I don't have 3.1
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-pmrqc:  1
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.2 (R4b).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 07:55:03 CDT
Reply-To:     jford@seebeck.ua.edu
From:         "James H. Ford III" <JFORD@SEEBECK.UA.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Problem with RARPSERV.NLM - kills TCPIP
X-To:         NOVELL%SUVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

> I'm having the same problem.  Moerten Soerensen (moerten@polisci.pol.umn.edu)
> suggested making sure server NICs have entries in both HOSTS and ETHERS.  This
> didn't solve my problem, and isn't a problem with you.  I wrote a C program
> to build the IP address into a copy config.tel based on the contents of
> SYS:ETC as a workaround until we can get RARP working.  I tried to load it
> on SPLICER, but got "Access denied" in the Upload directory.  How does one
> upload?

Toss it on risc.ua.edu in pub/00uploads and drop me a line.  I'll move it
to /pub/network/misc.

> >load ne2-32 NAME=IPX-ETHERNET SLOT=2 FRAME=ETHERNET_802.3
> >bind ipx to IPX-ETHERNET NET=2117
> >; TCPIP Setup
> >load TOKEN NAME=UCRPHIL1 SLOT=7 FRAME=TOKEN-RING_SNAP
> >load NE2-32 NAME=UCRPHIL SLOT=2 FRAME=ETHERNET_II
> >load TCPIP forward=yes

Perhaps LOAD TCPIP Forward=Yes Rip=Yes?

> One thing we have in common though is dual framing on one of the ethernet
 cards.
> Is anyone else routing IP through the server with 802.3 and ethernet_ii on the
> one card, _and_ running RARPSERV successfully?  (grasping at straws here :-( )

I have rarpserv running on a token-ring / WD8013 ether server, but am not
routing TCP/IP thru it.  A cisco takes care of that.  :-)   However, I do
believe that someone in A&S over here *is* successfully running RARPSERV
and forwarding IP.  I'll give him a shout.

> Chris Owen                           | c.owen@qut.edu.au
> Computer Based Education             | voice +61 7 864 2912
> Queensland University of Technology  | FAX   +61 7 864 1525
> Brisbane, Australia



James Ford - Consultant II, Seebeck Computer Center
             jford@ua1vm.ua.edu, jford@risc.ua.edu
             The University of Alabama (in Tuscaloosa, Alabama)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.2 (R4b).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 09:38:32 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Ray Todd Stevens <RAY@SAFETY.NWSCC.SEA06.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      please help me connect.
X-To:         NOVELL%SUVM.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu

Presently we are not recieving any novell list mail at our site.  I
sent a previous message asking for people who got it to reply.  I got
one reply from the edu side.  Is this all that got my message.

If you get this message please reply.  If you are in the mil side I
definiatly use a message from you to verify that the mail is getting
that far.

Ray Todd Stevens
Safety Dept NWSC Crane
Ray@safety.nwscc.sea06.navy.mil
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.2 (R4b).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 14:17:19 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Ray Todd Stevens <RAY@SAFETY.NWSCC.SEA06.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      SMTP forwarding agent.
X-To:         NOVELL%SUVM.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu

Does anyone know of a software package that runs on a PC which will
operate as a forwarding agent for SMTP mail.  There are a number of
TCP/IP mail packages for a PC out there, but I have yet to locate one
which will operate as a forwarding agent.

Ray Todd Stevens
Safety Dept NWSC Crane
Ray@safety.nwscc.sea06.navy.mil
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 17:50:11 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         David Cappello <u4b08@LFKW2.BGM.LINK.COM>
Subject:      Re: 10Base-T EISA card
              92 12:35 pm

According to Tony Townsend:
>
> Folks -
>
>   I have used EISA machines as servers before but am now faced with one that
> needs to be hooked into a 10Base-T environment.  Any recommendations on a
> good 10Base-T EISA card for the fileserver?
>
>   While I'm at it, what do people like to use for 10Base-T ISA workstation
> cards?
>
>   Thanks.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tony Townsend, Microcomputer Support Coordinator, Academic Computing Ctr,
>      Gilmer Hall, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903
>                adt@virginia.edu            804-982-4713

Tony, we have 10-T networks all over.  we have used 3COM 3c503s.  We
      have just started using Cabletrons 2110/2119 16-bit cards.  They
      are fast and low cost.  Plus cabletron has way-cool tech support.
      As for a 10-T server card, we never found one.  use a ne3200 with
      a aui to 10-T adapter, they work great.

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
[  David Cappello                           Internet:  dcappello@link.com  ]
[  Network Administrator                     ma-bell:  (607) 721-4358      ]
[  CAE-Link Corporation                          Fax:  (607) 771-8477      ]
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: urwaleck@eaeps1.tuwien.ac.at (Martin Urwaleck)
Subject: Re: HP JetPort
Organization: Inst. for General Electrics & Electronics, TU Vienna
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 08:43:49 GMT

In article <NOVELL%92040714052941@SUVM.ACS.SYR.EDU> VILLIELM@SNYNEWVM.BITNET writes:

>I just got the hp mailing ($199 for a JetPort, an interface
>card which plugs directly into your HP Laserjet II/III and
>lets you get right on the ethernet/token ring, unlike a
>NetPort (Intel) which still involves a relatively slow
>parallel port).  Claims to work with Netware, LanManager and
>Unix.  I'm just wondering if anyone has experienced one of
>these, how it stacks up, etc..
>                                          Bob Villielm
>                                          Programmer/Analyst
>                                          SUNY New Paltz

I have installed one of these ports in a Laserjet III. It works fine and 
fast. However, as far as I know, you have different interfaces for Netware, 
LanManager and Unix. BTW, in Austria (Europe) it's much more expensive, we 
pay ca. ATS 10.000.- which is US$ 900.

        Martin Urwaleck

    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
    |              If a cluttered desk means a cluttered mind,              |
    |                   what does an empty desk signify ?                   |
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Martin Urwaleck              | Internet: urwaleck@eaeps1.tuwien.ac.at |
    | Technische Universitaet Wien |           urwaleck@eaecl1.una.ac.at    |
    | Inst. fr Allgemeine         |                                        |
    | Elektrotechnik & Elektronik  | Phone: +43-1-58801-3839                |
    | Guhausstr.27-29             | FAX:   +43-1-505-26-66                 |
    | A-1040 Vienna  Austria       |                                        |
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 08:52:19 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM>
Comments:     Resent-From: Colin ST Rose <CSRCC@CUNYVM>
Comments:     Originally-From: Doug Wilkinson <DOUGW@BROWNVM.BITNET>
From:         Colin ST Rose <CSRCC@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Supervisor Password

 I agree 101%.


 /Colin St Rose   "Networks are my life, I live everywhere!"
       Internet: Csrcc@cunyvm.cuny.edu
              Bitnet: CSRCC@CUNYVM
                   COMPU$ERVE: 75730.2121@COMPUSERVE.COM
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>    I think we all understand your fustration, but doing it Novell's
>way is not only safe but it also protects other sites from unfriendly
>action.

It does not completely protect other sites from unfriendly action.  Lock
up your servers physically.  There are less elegant ways to reset the
supervisor's password from the console.  "Novell's way" makes it difficult
for the nasty people to have easy access to an unlocked server.

Doug Wilkinson
Computing and Information Services, Brown University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-pmrqc:  1
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.2 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 1992 11:03:03 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Michel Juillard <JUILLARD@NEWSCHOOL.EDU>
Subject:      Planning a Macintosh network
X-To:         NOVELL%SUVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

We had a good experience with Netware 3.11 for 60 MS-DOS machines
and  we are now planning a similar network for another 60 Macs
running the  following applications:
    QuarkXpress
    Adobe Illustrator
    Free Hand
    Photoshop
    Form Z
The computers are Mac CI maybe shortly a few Quadra. We're
currently running System 7.

We would like
     -   to  keep the software on the server, rather than on the
        individual hard  disks,
    -   do intensive file transfers to save large files on a few
        Syquest removable hard disks as well as scanned images,
    -   obtain printing services comparable or better than what we
        have now with Local Talk.

I'm interested in people experience with similar applications as well
as general opinions about Mac networking including telling me not try
to do it with Netware.

If you write me directly, I will post later a summary on the list.
Thanks for your help.

Michel Juillard
New School for Social Research/Parsons School of Design
New York
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:        UK.AC.LE.CSD.SYS; 14 APR 92 16:35:19 BST
Via:        [143.210.72.189] (pcmmac); Tue, 14 Apr 92 15:30:26 GMT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 16:41:35 +0000
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         pcm@LE.AC.UK
Subject:      BOOTP - PS

Another Question:

Does either BOOTP or RARP NLMs exist, and if so where can I get them?

Thanks, again
================================
   Paul C. Manning
   Senior Computer Officer
   Dept. of Computing Studies
   University of Leicester
   University Road
   Leicester LE1 7RH
   U.K.
================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-Mts: smtp
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 09:13:44 -0400
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         tmorris@ATHENA.SPH.UNC.EDU
Subject:      Re: crash dumps

(someone whose name and e-mail address I've lost wrote:)
>Postulate: My NW3.11 server has crashed and I've taken a dump of it

Ummm. This is a dumb question, but I've been unable to find the answer
by looking through help and the manuals, but:

        How does one take a crash dump on a NW3.11 server?

I would love to RTFM if I just knew which FM to R!

Thanks in advance!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Morris, UNC School of Public Health         tmorris@athena.sph.unc.edu
Computing and Information Services              tom@uncsphvx  (BITNET)