HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Martin Dwomoh - Tweneboah
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Neural Networks
Summary: Application of Neural nets in Databases
Keywords: Information retrieval using neural nets
Date: 9 Jan 93 12:41:32 GMT
Reply-To: martind@ifi.unit.no
Organization: University of Trondheim

I am a student at the Department of Computer Science,University of Trondheim
;Norway. I am about to start my  thesis for my Masters Degree. I intend to work
in the area of NEURAL NETWORKS. To be specific, I want to do a research in how
Neural Networks are applied in Databases for information retrieval.

I would be grateful if you, out there will be of help as with regards to
sources Bibliographies,Books,etc.,etc.,
as well as exchange of ideas in this area of study.

Thanks in advance.  
Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
From: mark@cs.UAlberta.CA (Mark Green)
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Organization: University of Alberta
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 19:47:02 GMT

In article <1993Jan6.222608.20598@oz.plymouth.edu> sos@oz.plymouth.edu (Steffan O'Sullivan) writes:
>jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist) writes:
>>In article <1if7duINN2ho@gallium.cs.unc.edu> harris@cs.unc.edu (Trey Harris) writes:
>>
>>BZZT!  Urban Legend Alert.  The querty keyboard was _not_ designed
>>to slow typists, it was designed to avoid jamming the typewriter.
>>Typewriters don't jam because the typist is too fast (unless the typist
>>presses one key before releasing another, which good typists didn't
>>do on mechanical typewriters) - they jam when a rapid sequence of keystrokes
>>activates hammers that are physically close together in the machine, wedging
>>them together.  To keep the mechanism as simple as possible, the hammers
>>were in the same sequence as the horizontal sequence of the keys.  The
>>querty keyboard was designed so that common keystroke sequences, _not_
>>commonly used keys, were widely distributed.  
>
>Urban legend or not, it makes more sense than your reply.  LOOK at the
>QWERTY layout: "e" and "r" right next to each other, "e" and "d" right
>next to each other, "e" and "s" right next to each other - these are
>common, VERY common key sequences.  Your answer does not make sense.
>Look at how many "es" "er" "ed" combos are in this post alone. . . 
>
>And, yes, I'm a devoted Dvorak user, and I've read Dvorak's book on the
>psychology of typing.  The major disad is when I'm at a machine that I
>can't load software to reprogram the keys - otherwise, there are no
>disadvantages.
>
>-- 
>  - Steffan O'Sullivan		         sos@oz.plymouth.edu

I hate posting this in general, but here goes.

Yes, it is an urban legend.  The QWERTY keyboard was designed to
minimize jamming by placing common key sequence far apart.  This is
a mechanical distance, not physical distance on the keyboard itself.
If you look at the 'e' 's' and 'd' keys, you will see that 'e' is on
the row above 's' and 'd', so they are mechanically far apart.

About 15 or 20 years ago there were a number of studies done on
keyboard layout (you can look at old issues of Human Factors and
Ergonomics to find them).  The net result of these studies is that
keyboard layout doesn't matter that much, 5-10% difference in typing
speed at the very most.  If you really want to type fast look at
a chording keyboard, or change the shape of the keyboard itself.
From: jgd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (John G Dobnick)
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: Really better? (Re: DVORAK keyboard?)
Date: 8 Jan 1993 05:54:41 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Reply-To: jgd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: jgd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

From article <1993Jan7.160953.3516@ncsa.uiuc.edu>, by jsue@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Jeffrey L. Sue):
> I'm really curious about the contention that the DVORAK keyboard is
> really faster.  I thought I read somewhere recently that a study was
> done that brought this idea into question, if not completely dispelling 
> it.  I wish I could remember where I read this, but it seems like it was
> just a smallish article (probably just filler) - which would be difficult
> to track down.

I recall reading an article on this subject many years ago.  Can't recall
just where -- it _might_ have been Scientific American.  Anyway, I recall
that the conclusion was that Dvorak layout resulted in _faster_ typing
rates, as well as being easier on the typists.

Wish I could recall where that was.
-- 
John G Dobnick                          ATTnet: (414) 229-5727
Computing Services Division             INTERNET: jgd@uwm.edu
University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee     UUCP: uunet!uwm!jgd

"Knowing how things work is the basis for appreciation,
and is thus a source of civilized delight."  -- William Safire
Newsgroups: comp.misc
From: tmjones@eos.ncsu.edu (@large(Are you Object-Oriented?))
Subject: hand writing
Originator: tmjones@c00100-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Keywords: Information retrieval using neural nets
Reply-To: tmjones@eos.ncsu.edu (@large(Are you Object-Oriented?))
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 16:51:03 GMT


I am looking for dealers of lightpens, could anyone point me into the right
direction.  Also I am looking for maple like code.  Algorithms that handle
functions in a symbolic sense and be able to manipulate them into their
derivatives and integrals.  Please email me your responses to

tmjones@eos.ncsu.edu.

Oh, by the way, that lightpen must be PC-compatible.  I would like it to 
plug in to a tandy1000sx port, but any port will do fine.
-- 
sdfdfssdf
Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
From: jad@beta.lanl.gov (John De Vries)
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 20:33:33 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.231021.28440@ee.ubc.ca> williamb@ee.ubc.ca (william burchill) writes:
>
>	Any info on how fast typists are with chording keyboards?  Good
>but not great for QWERTY is 90 wpm.


If you are willing to use the machines that are common in courtrooms
(which is to say, using a phonetic system) I've heard that speeds up
to 250 wpm are NOT uncommon.  The really spiffy thing is that
supposedly they've got hardware & software to convert the tapes to "normal"
text...

The quote for the speed came from a court recorder who could go that fast.


John Atwood
---
| From the productions of Twentieth Century Vole!  1993 (c)opyright ZtF Press
|                                          ... a division of Ipsum Lorit, Ink.
---

Xref: sparky comp.misc:4776 general:403
From: rick@ee.uwm.edu (Rick Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
Subject: DVORAK keyboard?
Date: 6 Jan 1993 16:20:28 GMT
Organization: Just me.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.2.33
Summary: What's it all about?

Okay, I've heard of the Dvorak keyboard...  Can anyone answer some questions
about it (or point me to where I can get them answered)?

1.) What's the layout?  Does it differ internationally like the QWERTY does?
	(You know how the symbols tend to be rearranged depending upon
	 what country you're in, etc.)

2.) How does it handle international characters (umlauts, accents, etc.)?

3.) What are some advantages or disadvantages of the Dvorak keyboard?
	In short, why does it even exist?

Thanks in advance...   and yes, I'm aware that this will post all over the
			world because I cross-posted to "general".  So sue me.

Rick Miller   <rick@ee.uwm.edu> | <rick@discus.mil.wi.us>   Ricxjo Muelisto
Occupation:  Husband, Father, WEPCo. WAN Mgr., Discus Sys0p, and  Linux fan
Newsgroups: comp.misc
From: kaskubar@mayo.edu (Bruce Kaskubar)
Subject: Scheduling algorithms
Organization: Mayo Foundation, Rochester MN. Campus
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 15:52:40 GMT

Can anybody lead me to a body of literature regarding scheduling  
algorithms?

Thanks

Bruce Kaskubar, kaskubar@mayo.edu
Newsgroups: comp.misc
From: kaskubar@mayo.edu (Bruce Kaskubar)
Subject: GUIs
Organization: Mayo Foundation, Rochester MN. Campus
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 17:36:32 GMT

Anyone out there know of a (standard) user interface that runs on  
several hardware/os platforms?

I'm looking for something like X that's not X.

thx

Bruce Kaskubar
kaskubar@mayo.edu
Newsgroups: comp.misc
From: edavid@sun2.lri.fr (Erwan David)
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Reply-To: edavid@sun2.lri.fr (Erwan David)
Organization: LRI - Univ. Paris-Sud / CNRS URA 410
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 09:05:28 GMT

In article <1993Jan8.074835.717@sq.sq.com>, msb@sq.sq.com (Mark Brader) writes:
|> Just for interest, here's the order of the type bars (hammers) on my
|> typewriter.  It's electric, but not electronic, and I would expect the
|> order to be that same as is typical on a manual machine.
|> 
|> 	1! Q A 2@ Z W S 3# X E D 4$ C R F 5% V T G 6~ B Y H
|> 
|> 	7& N U J 8* M I K 9( , O L 0) . P :; -_ / ][ '" =+
|> 
|> (The character shown as ~ above is actually a matrix of dots, for
|> shading out an area.  The 1! and =+ type bars came with removable
|> heads, in case I wanted to buy other characters like 1/2 or the cent
|> sign.)  You can see how the QWERTY pattern relates to the sequence.

	Yes it is: Look at your keyboard, imagine the keys are extremely 
and put them down on a single line: You'll get this pattern.

	Erwan

-- 
Erwan DAVID	LRI (Orsay)				edavid@lri.fr
		Ecole Normale Superieure (Paris)	edavid@ens.fr
		LIVE (Evry)				edavid@univ-evry.fr
Xref: sparky comp.misc:4828 general:429
From: jgd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (John G Dobnick)
Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Date: 9 Jan 1993 01:37:35 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Reply-To: jgd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: jgd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

From article <1993Jan8.192059.21262@mprgate.mpr.ca>, by vanderby@mprgate.mpr.ca (David Vanderbyl):
> jgd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (John G Dobnick) writes:
> [stuff about typewriters]
 
> You argument is similar to this:
> Cars are designed to go fast.  Going fast in a car often kills people.
> Therefore, cars were designed to kill people.

Say what?!!  Non sequitur!  Faulty analogy.  

"Going fast" never killed anyone.  Coming to a sudden stop, however,
_can_ be extremely detrimental to longevity.

-- 
John G Dobnick                          ATTnet: (414) 229-5727
Computing Services Division             INTERNET: jgd@uwm.edu
University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee     UUCP: uunet!uwm!jgd

"Knowing how things work is the basis for appreciation,
and is thus a source of civilized delight."  -- William Safire
Newsgroups: comp.misc
From: mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Ed McCreary)
Subject: looking for nixpub.
Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 18:31:00 GMT

I'd appreciate it if some kind soul would post or mail me the
nixpub listing.  It's no longer on our local spool and I don't
have ftp/telnet access.

thanks in advance,
eddie

--
Ed McCreary                                               ,__o
mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com                       _-\_<,
"If it were not for laughter, there would be no Tao."  (*)/'(*)
Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
From: jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist)
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Organization: Lachman Technology, Incorporated, Naperville, IL
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 19:24:44 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.152015.11481@cc.gatech.edu> duggan@cc.gatech.edu (Rick Duggan) writes:
>In article <1ihgdgINNhpm@uwm.edu> rick@ee.uwm.edu (Rick Miller) writes:
>>Just think:  Who would consider designing a typewriter to hinder typists?
>>		Maybe you had a bad experience in your typing class, but
>>		it would have been financial suicide for any company to
>>		produce a keyboard which was inherently slower than the
>>		many others which were available at the time.
>
>Another way to think about this is the following:
>
>How long do you think it would take before *someone* learned how
>to do 90wpm on a QWERTY keyboard?  Wouldn't the typewriters just
>jam again as soon as people got up to speed?  This would probably take at
>most a month or so, at which point all those QWERTY keyboards
>would again be useless.

On a manual typewriter?  Even the best manuals I've used had relatively
long throw keys, relative to the cheapest electrics, and the shorter
the key throw, the stronger your fingers need to be.  Even back in the
days of "typing rooms", with formally trained typists doing nothing but
typing all day long (the only ones who'd be physically up to extreme
speed), the educators knew that it was more efficient to teach the typists
to pace themselves, and type at a continuous pace rather than bursts of
speed punctuated by confused pauses.
-- 
Jonathan E. Quist                              Lachman Technology, Incorporated
jeq@i88.isc.com  '71 CL450-K4 "Gleep", DoD #094        Naperville, IL
 __       There's nothing quite like the pitter-patter of little feet,
 \/                   followed by the words "Daddy!  Yay!"
From: jem@sunSITE.unc.edu (Jonathan Magid)
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Date: 7 Jan 93 04:19:07 GMT
Organization: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

In article <1993Jan06.195807.4211@i88.isc.com> jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist) writes:
>
>BZZT!  Urban Legend Alert.  The querty keyboard was _not_ designed
>to slow typists, it was designed to avoid jamming the typewriter.

If you also notice, it is also extremely good for demos. they letters for the
word "typewriter" are all on the upper row.

Some things never change...

jem.

-- 
Jonathan Magid     jem@sunSITE.unc.edu       sunSITE Administrator
Virtual pizza Delivery (tm)::faxed in 30 cycles or less or you get it
----------------------------------------FREE!!!-----------------------
Newsgroups: comp.misc
From: laderman@Qstar.COM (Jacob Laderman)
Subject: evaluating Disk Optimization packages
Summary: evaluating Disk Optimization and defragmentation
Keywords: Disk, Optimization, defragmentation
Organization: Qstar Technologies
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 15:05:03 GMT

I am currently evaluating Disk Optimization and Disk Defragmentation
packages for unix systems.
If you have any experience with any packages, please send me a copy of your 
evaluation report, or a note of likes, dislikes and problems.

Thanks in advance.

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 |	Jacob 							 |
 |	Laderman@QStar.com		Systems Administrator	 |
 |	Qstar Technologies		(v) 301 762-9800	 |
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


-- 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 |	Jacob 							 |
 |	Laderman@QStar.com		Systems Administrator	 |
 |	Qstar Technologies		(v) 301 762-9800	 |
Newsgroups: comp.misc
From: derosa@rtsg.mot.com (John DeRosa)
Subject: 8mm Tapes -> Data versus Video
Reply-To: motcid!derosa@uunet.uu.net
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 15:32:52 GMT

Does anyone know what the difference is 
between tapes labeled for Video use and 
those labeled for Data use.  

I assume that the manufacturer would tell me all about 
how the magnetic density is greater, the coating is 
better, less drop outs, higher quality backing,
etc.  

What I want to know is, are they really 
better from a users point of view?

I have been using Exabyte and Maxell tapes and
wonder is there is that big of a difference
between them and the (much) cheaper Maxell
8mm video tapes.  

The Maxell tapes that I am using are labeled;
"HELICAL-SCAN 8mm DATA CARTRIDGE", "NOMINAL
CAPACITY: 2.5/5.0 GIGABYTES".  Therefore, 
Maxell at least thinks that they are different
enought to warrent the extra cost.

Thanks, John 
-- 
=  Enjoy!          John DeRosa, Motorola, Inc, ESMR Development  =
=  thanks          derosa@ssd.comm.mot.com                       =
=  a 10^6          N1111@applelink.apple.com                     =
Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
From: nrabinow@itsmail1.hamilton.edu (Nancy Rabinowitz)
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Organization: Hamilton College - Clinton, NY
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 00:39:08 GMT

So, if you can't touch-type then you shouldn't think about getting a
Dvorak?  Isn't the physical keyboard different?

Mike

-- 
Mike Rabinowitz     Internet address--nrabinow@itsmail1.hamilton.edu 
		    CIS Address--70732,2072      GEnie--M.Rabinowit1
		    Delphi Address--Darkknite

Newsgroups: comp.misc
From: msb@sq.sq.com (Mark Brader)
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Organization: SoftQuad Inc., Toronto, Canada
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 93 07:48:35 GMT

[PLEASE delete the cross-post to "general".  Cross-posting to a non-
local group and a group with no dots in it is never a proper action.]

> If you had bothered to read other messages, or even knew anything
> about mechanical typewriters, you would know that E and D *are*
> "horizontally" adjacent in the only place it counts: the hammers.

Just for interest, here's the order of the type bars (hammers) on my
typewriter.  It's electric, but not electronic, and I would expect the
order to be that same as is typical on a manual machine.

	1! Q A 2@ Z W S 3# X E D 4$ C R F 5% V T G 6~ B Y H

	7& N U J 8* M I K 9( , O L 0) . P :; -_ / ][ '" =+

(The character shown as ~ above is actually a matrix of dots, for
shading out an area.  The 1! and =+ type bars came with removable
heads, in case I wanted to buy other characters like 1/2 or the cent
sign.)  You can see how the QWERTY pattern relates to the sequence.
-- 
Mark Brader			"All this government stuff, in other words,
SoftQuad Inc., Toronto		 is not reading matter, but prefabricated
utzoo!sq!msb, msb@sq.com	 parts of quarrels."	-- Rudolf Flesch

This article is in the public domain.
Xref: sparky comp.misc:4787 general:410
From: jgd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (John G Dobnick)
Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Date: 7 Jan 1993 05:41:07 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: world
Reply-To: jgd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: jgd@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

From article <1if0scINN6k2@uwm.edu>, by rick@ee.uwm.edu (Rick Miller):
> Okay, I've heard of the Dvorak keyboard...  Can anyone answer some questions
> about it (or point me to where I can get them answered)?

The Milwaukee Public Museum has an excellent (and large) historical
collection of typewriters.  (This probably has something to do with a
certain Christopher Sholes being a "local boy" :-).)

You might ask them your burning typewriter questions.

-- 
John G Dobnick                          ATTnet: (414) 229-5727
Computing Services Division             INTERNET: jgd@uwm.edu
University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee     UUCP: uunet!uwm!jgd

"Knowing how things work is the basis for appreciation,
and is thus a source of civilized delight."  -- William Safire
Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
From: sos@oz.plymouth.edu (Steffan O'Sullivan)
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, NH.
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 22:26:08 GMT

jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist) writes:
>In article <1if7duINN2ho@gallium.cs.unc.edu> harris@cs.unc.edu (Trey Harris) writes:
>
>BZZT!  Urban Legend Alert.  The querty keyboard was _not_ designed
>to slow typists, it was designed to avoid jamming the typewriter.
>Typewriters don't jam because the typist is too fast (unless the typist
>presses one key before releasing another, which good typists didn't
>do on mechanical typewriters) - they jam when a rapid sequence of keystrokes
>activates hammers that are physically close together in the machine, wedging
>them together.  To keep the mechanism as simple as possible, the hammers
>were in the same sequence as the horizontal sequence of the keys.  The
>querty keyboard was designed so that common keystroke sequences, _not_
>commonly used keys, were widely distributed.  

Urban legend or not, it makes more sense than your reply.  LOOK at the
QWERTY layout: "e" and "r" right next to each other, "e" and "d" right
next to each other, "e" and "s" right next to each other - these are
common, VERY common key sequences.  Your answer does not make sense.
Look at how many "es" "er" "ed" combos are in this post alone. . . 

And, yes, I'm a devoted Dvorak user, and I've read Dvorak's book on the
psychology of typing.  The major disad is when I'm at a machine that I
can't load software to reprogram the keys - otherwise, there are no
disadvantages.

-- 
  - Steffan O'Sullivan		         sos@oz.plymouth.edu
Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
From: williamb@ee.ubc.ca (william burchill)
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Organization: University of BC, Electrical Engineering
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 23:10:21 GMT


	Any info on how fast typists are with chording keyboards?  Good
but not great for QWERTY is 90 wpm.


Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
From: karr@cs.cornell.edu (David Karr)
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 01:17:26 GMT

In article <C0HsJK.trI@shrdlu.kwnet.on.ca> gdm@shrdlu.kwnet.on.ca (Giles D Malet) writes:
>sos@oz.plymouth.edu (Steffan O'Sullivan) writes:
>
>>Urban legend or not, it makes more sense than your reply.  LOOK at the
>>QWERTY layout: "e" and "r" right next to each other, "e" and "d" right
>>next to each other, "e" and "s" right next to each other [...] 
>
>If you had bothered reading the post you were quoting you would have
>noticed one highly relevant fact - an attempt was made to keep often
>used sequences apart *horizontally* due to the mechanical nature of
>the beasts. "es" and "ed" are thus irrelevant.

If you had bothered to read other messages, or even knew anything
about mechanical typewriters, you would know that E and D *are*
"horizontally" adjacent in the only place it counts: the hammers.  The
reason the keys are "staggered" on the keyboard is so that the
mechanisms for four consecutive hammers can easily be attached to keys
on four different rows.  E and S, however, are separated by 3 and X.

> "er" is perhaps proof of
>the fact that this is not a prefect world, but "er" is probably not so
>high on the `most common' list.

No, E and R are separated by D, 4, and C, so are a lot less "jammable"
than the E-D combination.  They are also a lot more frequently paired
in English usage.  In fact according to authority (Abraham Sinkov,
Elementary Cryptanalysis, MAA 1966) the digraphs ER and RE are the
fourth and fifth most frequent in English usage, after TH, HE, and
IN, and together are more frequent than any other such letter pair.

I would not have responded at all to your post, since others have
convincingly argued that the designed-to-be-slow theory is false,
except for the way you combined your "facts" with this supercilious
tone:

>My, my. You had better stay at that school, and hopefully learn a few
>simple facts of life, especially that if something `makes more sense'
>it is not necessarily right.

-- David Karr (karr@cs.cornell.edu)


Newsgroups: comp.misc,general
From: nrabinow@itsmail1.hamilton.edu (Nancy Rabinowitz)
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard?
Organization: Hamilton College - Clinton, NY
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 21:42:28 GMT

I can't touch type, so maybe I should learn the Dvorak thing.  But, I
type really quick.  I know where a lot of stuff is, and therefor I don't
make many mistakes at all.  I'd bet I type about 30 wpm or so.  The
problem with typing tutors is you have to look at the screen to see what
letter to type, and I have to look at the keyboard.

Mike

-- 
Mike Rabinowitz     Internet address--nrabinow@itsmail1.hamilton.edu 
		    CIS Address--70732,2072      GEnie--M.Rabinowit1
		    Delphi Address--Darkknite

Newsgroups: comp.misc
From: wiltz@after (David Wiltz)
Subject: Macintosh installer script info???
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 20:43:33 GMT

Does anyone out there have the format for a Mac installer
script?

please e-mail or post

-Dave
--
   David Wiltz                                wiltz@after.math.uiuc.edu
   Calculus&Mathematica Development Team
   University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign  NeXTmail always welcome!
-Doing business with the government is a lot like playing poker with God.-