HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nauen@wrair-emh1.army.mil
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Fidonet
Date: 22 Jan 1993 14:13:40 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

In <1993Jan18.174829.8201@nwnexus.WA.COM> ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims)
wrote:

> David Dodell is not connected to fidonet.org any longer (hasn't been for
> a few months).  Questions regarding fidonet.org administration should go
> to hostmaster@fidonet.org.  . . .

I think that should be hostmaster@fidonet.fidonet.org

Ric <nauen@wrair-emh1.army.mil>  <nauen%wrmain.decnet@detrick-emh1.army.mil>
           ^^^^^Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
        U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Date: 22 Jan 93 12:21:50 EST
From: "SMTP MAILER" <postmaster@wrair-emh1.army.mil>
Subject: Mail Delivery Problem
To: "nauen" <nauen@wrair-emh1.army.mil>

 ----Reason for mail failure follows----
Sending mail to <hostmaster@fidonet.org> :
  Could not be delivered for three days.


> fidonet.org.
Server:  zeus.ieee.org
Address:  140.98.1.1

*** No address information is available for fidonet.org.

> set q=mx
> fidonet.org.

*** No mail exchanger information is available for fidonet.org.

> set q=any
> fidonet.org.

fidonet.org     origin = ZEUS.IEEE.ORG
        mail addr = hostmaster.fidonet.fidonet.org

Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: tucker@bedford.progress.COM (Kyle Tucker)
Subject: cc: Mail PO via GatorShare	
Reply-To: tucker@bedford.progress.COM
Organization: Progress Software Corp.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:32:57 GMT

Hi,
	We have cc:Mail in house to test to see if we like it. I have
made the PO database on a SUN and Openwin cc:Mail and DOS via PC-NFS
can access it fine, however the MACs :-( fail to see the database 
which are mounted via Cayman's GatorShare program. Has anyone gotten 
this to work or want to take a stab as to why it does not work. Using
the MAC Admin program fails to create a database this way due to NFT errors.
Any clues? I hung up on their tech support after 45 minutes on hold!

Thanks again, Kyle
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Kyle Tucker - Email Administrator  | 		Progress Software Corporation
tucker@bedford.progress.com 	   |		14 Oak Park
(617)280-4565			   |		Bedford, Mass. 01730
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,sci.crypt,alt.security,comp.security.misc,alt.security.ripem,comp.answers,news.answers
From: sna@prophet.pharm.pitt.edu (Stewart Abramson)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Free E-mail programs for Windows??
Date: 28 Jan 93 21:22:05 GMT
Followup-To: comp.mail.misc
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pittsburgh



Hi there.  I am looking for a free SMTP/POP-3 E-mail program for
MS-DOS Windows.  I have Leemail and Eudora on my Mac.  Is there a
similar program for MS-DOS Windows?  I appreciate any help.


Thanks
Stewart


Stewart N. Abramson
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
University of Pittsburgh

sna@prophet.pharm.pitt.edu
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: brvanvoo@grad0mtu.edu (Brian VanVoorst)
Subject: HELP!  Prodigy <=> Internet
Organization: Michigan Tech
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:14:22 GMT

HELP!  I have the id of a friend on Prodigy who I want to send email to
from the internet.  Can someone please send me the syntax I will need
to use?  Also the return syntax from prodigy back to internet would 
help too.

Please send your wisdom to: brvanvoo@mtu.edu

Thanks VERY much,
Brian
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: edmoore@vcd.hp.com (Ed Moore)
Subject: Nifty Serve ??
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:59:53 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard VCD
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.9 PL6]

We use Internet mail.  Another company has asked whether we can send them
mail on Nifty Serve.  What is Nifty Serve?
From: nauen@wrair-emh1.army.mil
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Internet access
Date: 25 Jan 1993 18:10:52 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

In <9301252023.AA16286@aerie> jvinson@xsoft.xerox.com (Jeffrey A Vinson) 
writes:

> I am search of cheap (free if possible) internet email sites . . .
>
> so my relatives can log in from home, and send me email cross country.

I'm confused.  If they are to get it free, then who is to pay the costs?

Ric
From: nauen@wrair-emh1.army.mil
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Help needed on Telecom Gold gateways?
Date: 27 Jan 93 19:13:21 GMT
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

In <1059326.80146.2934@kcbbs.gen.nz> Sean_Fausett@kcbbs.gen.nz (Sean 
Fausett) writes:

> I have been trying to establish 2-way e-mail with a company in the UK
> whereby they use Telecom Gold (TG) and I use the Internet only.
>
> . . .  I have since been
> able to send (but not receive!) e-mail via Internet if I use the address
> "10084.mag31653@gateway-to-gold.interspan.gb". On first using this
> address I received e-mail saying a dummy TG mailbox had been created for
> me, but the company in the UK has had no success in replying to this
> mailbox! 
>
> Has anyone else tried using this 'gateway-to-gold' with success? Are
> there other gateways that possibly bypass the messy business of requiring
> a 'dummy' TG mailbox ID? *Any* help appreciated.

Others report no problem with using this gateway.  Since the problem 
appears to be on the Telecom Gold side of the gateway, perhaps the company
in the UK should be discussing it with their Telecom Gold customer service
rep or help desk.  This would be a benefit I would expect, if paying for 
commercial email.

Ric <nauen@wrair-emh1.army.mil>  <nauen%wrmain.decnet@detrick-emh1.army.mil>
           ^^^^^Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
        U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
From: jvinson@xsoft.xerox.com (Jeffrey A Vinson)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Internet access
Date: 25 Jan 93 20:23:35 GMT
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA01361; Mon, 25 Jan 93 12:24:29 -0800
X-Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA13033; Mon, 25 Jan 93 12:24:28 -0800
X-Received: from xsoft.xerox.com ([13.242.72.2]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <11609>; Mon, 25 Jan 1993 12:23:47 PST
X-Received: from aerie ([13.242.56.32]) by xsoft.xerox.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA08921; Mon, 25 Jan 93 12:23:43 PST
X-Received: by aerie (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA16286; Mon, 25 Jan 93 12:23:35 PST
X-To: comp.mail.misc.usenet

Hi netters,

I am search of cheap (free if possible) internet email sites in the
following area codes:

	(302) - Delaware
	(919) - Raleigh

so my relatives can log in from home, and send me email cross country.

Please inform me of such sites if possible.

Thank you,
Jeff Vinson
vinson@migration.com
From: dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (DWT)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Genie?
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:12:02 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Contributor Account at ddsw1, Chicago, Illinois  60657

When I wrote this:
|    CompuServe does charge for [sending] mail within CompuServe.

Karl_Kleinpaste@cs.cmu.edu followed up in <C1FHr5.MIH.2@cs.cmu.edu>:

| That didn't ring quite true to me, so I asked someone at CompuServe
| about this.

OK.

| If you are a pay-as-you-go subscriber, there are no charges aside from
| connect time.

Right.

| If you are a flat-rate subscriber, you are charged based on the size
| of the message, but there is an initial allowance of approx 60
| 1-2Kbyte messages before those additional charges start.

Again right.

| That would cover quite a lot of email, for most folk.

Yes, but whether you're using up your allowance (and getting charged if you
go past the $9 monthly credit) or getting charged for connect time, it still
costs something.

I suppose one can include the electric bill in telecommunicating costs and
say that email within a local BBS isn't free of charges either.

David W. Tamkin   Box 59297   Northtown Station, Illinois  60659-0297
dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com    CompuServe: 73720,1570    MCI Mail: 426-1818
From: gray@cac.washington.edu (Terry Gray)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Ignorance to MIME's intent
Date: 22 Jan 1993 22:16:45 GMT
Organization: UW Networks and Distributed Computing
NNTP-Posting-Host: shiva1.cac.washington.edu

In article <1993Jan22.202655.20532@progress.com> tucker@bedford.progress.COM writes:
>
>I am testing mail packages for future use. I am playing presently with
>Pine for dumb terminals and Zmail for X. Perhaps I am missing something, but
>isn't MIME compliancy supposed to enable me to att/de tach files of certain
>types between dissimilar mailers? It appears attaching a executable binary
>can only be detached in it's original executable form by the same mailer
>that sent it. This appears to make these two mailers appear to be as incompatible as any other non-MIME mailers. Have my expectations of MIME's
>meaning been way overblown or am I missing something?  

There's nothing wrong with your expectations... however, because MIME is 
a fairly recent effort, it is not impossible that there are bugs in the
implementations.

All proper MIME implementations should be able to send and receive
arbitrary files using base64 encoding.  If you suspect that Pine is
doing this incorrectly, please send details to pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu
so we can get it fixed... (and make sure you are using Pine 3.05 or later.)

--
Terry Gray
 University of Washington
  gray@cac.washington.edu
From: dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (DWT)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Genie?
Date: 25 Jan 93 16:07:28 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Contributor Account at ddsw1, Chicago, Illinois  60657

schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com (John Schuch) wrote in
<1993Jan25.021331.11088@phx.mcd.mot.com>:

[I had listed GEnie's rates for mail through the Internet gateway.]

| GEEZE! I'll have to stop complaining about Compuserve's mail rates!

No, go right ahead.  Remember that GEnie charges nothing for mail within
GEnie, whereas CompuServe does charge for [sending] mail within CompuServe.

David W. Tamkin   Box 59297   Northtown Station, Illinois  60659-0297
dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com    CompuServe: 73720,1570    MCI Mail: 426-1818
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: tucker@bedford.progress.COM (Kyle Tucker)
Subject: Ignorance to MIME's intent
Reply-To: tucker@bedford.progress.COM
Organization: Progress Software Corp.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:26:55 GMT

Firstly, I have not read the RFC (I intend to), I just need a quick yes/no.

I am testing mail packages for future use. I am playing presently with
Pine for dumb terminals and Zmail for X. Perhaps I am missing something, but
isn't MIME compliancy supposed to enable me to att/de tach files of certain
types between dissimilar mailers? It appears attaching a executable binary
can only be detached in it's original executable form by the same mailer
that sent it. This appears to make these two mailers appear to be as incompatible as any other non-MIME mailers. Have my expectations of MIME's
meaning been way overblown or am I missing something?  

- Thanks, Kyle
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Kyle Tucker - Email Administrator  | 		Progress Software Corporation
tucker@bedford.progress.com 	   |		14 Oak Park
(617)280-4565			   |		Bedford, Mass. 01730
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: lturnerj@cc.curtin.edu.au
Subject: navy contact
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 02:03:39 GMT

Can anyone help me contact the Tactical Training Group Pacific of the
US Navy?  I have tried using my gopher here and am not having much
success.  They may not have any access but I'm sure the navy has some
access.  Please reply to me directly.

J Turner
lturnerj@cc.curtin.edu.au

Newsgroups: acs.magnus,comp.mail.misc
From: khall@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Keith A Hall)
Subject: Re: email at work policy
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:47:14 GMT

In article <9301271317.AA08461@bottom.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> Mike J. Brown
<mjbrown@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> writes:
>... who have net access at work... 
>... what your office's policy is toward using email and news at work?
>Do you use it for work?  What % of the time?  Is your office's policy in
>writing?  What is it?

Email supports a major segment of my work.  There is no better way to interact 
with colleagues than email for daily administrative and substantive issues.  
FASGATE has added signficantly to the power of email for contacting those who 
don't read their email or who don't have email.

Raising the issue of restricting use is similar to raising the issue of using 
the telephone, US Mail, typewriter, or word processor at work.  Should we go 
back to pencils?

Keith
-- 
  Keith A. Hall, Professor         FuzzEmail  hall.25@osu.edu
  The Ohio State University            EMAIL  khall@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
  29 W. Woodruff Av.  122RA            VOICE  614-292-7836 
  Columbus, OH 43210-1177 USA            FAX  614-292-7900 
Xref: sparky comp.mail.misc:4550 news.newusers.questions:6082 alt.internet.access.wanted:1391
From: trsnyder@mcs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,_swat.comp.unix,news.newusers.questions,alt.internet.access.wanted
Subject: Re: Q: Commercial usage  of Internet with mail-daemons
Date: 28 Jan 93 15:46:02 GMT
Organization: ASCI

>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Kohn <kohn@cs.swarthmore.edu> writes:

Daniel> 	I have been using Usenet and the Internet for about
Daniel> three years now, and have recently come up with an idea for a
Daniel> commercial service to be available to Internet users.  In
Daniel> general terms, it would be a mail-daemon that would provide a
Daniel> service to users who would include their MasterCard or Visa
Daniel> number in the e-mail letter.  I have several questions about

This is a joke, right?  Visa and Mastercard numbers in email?  I like my
credit rating too much to send it though this easily interceptable medium.

Many sites use store and forward mail.  UUCP does this.  Sendmail does it
(although it usually forwards quite quickly).  Do you trust every machine
that your mail passes through to resist the temptation of looking?  Or people
using Ethernet snoopers to listen in on traffic as it goes by....

Sendmail bounce messages generally send a copy of the message to Postmaster.
If you mistype, do you want your credit card number to be in his/her hands?

Bob
From: nauen@wrair-emh1.army.mil
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Finding users (from internet) that are on X400
Date: 21 Jan 1993 11:11:02 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

In <theall.74.727582696@gdalsrv.sas.upenn.edu> theall@gdalsrv.sas.upenn.edu
(George A. Theall) asks:

>   How about finding out who services a particular ADMD? I'm trying to
> reach someone on GEIS; I think the ADMD is MARK400. 

Last I knew, guidance on sending mail to GEIS (GENIE and Quik-COMM)
was supposed to be available from postmaster@relay1.geis.com.

Ric

Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: andy@vistachrome.com (Andrew Finkenstadt)
Subject: Re: Genie?
Reply-To: postmaster@genie.geis.com
Organization: Vista-Chrome, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:22:36 GMT

dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (DWT) writes:
>GEnie's reply command does not work (last I checked) on mail that arrived
>through the Internet gateway.  A response must be hand-addressed to 
>user@site.domain@inet# -- yes, that's two "@"'s and a "#".  The "user@site.-
>domain" part must be thirty-two characters or shorter, but GEnie knows that
>that's a problem and it might be fixed some day.

The two-@ sign behaviour is an artifact of the way the gateway is
implemented to allow one mail system on GEnie instead of two.  The
actual limitation on the length of addresses is 35 characters, and
will be removed Real Soon Now.  The same changes necessary to implement
X.400 addressing will help fix this 35-character limitation.

If you use the form on the INTERNET page (#207) there's no need to
know about the @INET# added to the end - just indicate the proper
domain address and it adds it on for you.

The REPLY command doesn't work on any "foreign" mail.  The Internet
just happens to be the most common form of Inter-community mail.  A 
tool such as the Aladdin products know how to spot Internet mail and
correctly send it with the non-reply command.

For those GEnie subscribers needing to send mail to far-away places
such as Germany and Dayton Ohio, I have been creating shorthand aliases
for those persons when made aware of the situation, typically through
GEnie Feedback.

>Mail addressed through the gateway to the valid GEmail name of a GEnie user
>who hasn't subscribed to the gateway (or who has quit it) will bounce.
>David W. Tamkin   Box 59297   Northtown Station, Illinois  60659-0297
>dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com    CompuServe: 73720,1570    MCI Mail: 426-1818

Andy
Postmaster@GEnie.geis.com
-- 
Andrew Finkenstadt, Vista-Chrome, Inc., Homes & Land Publishing Corporation
GEnie Unix RoundTable Manager, andy@vistachrome.com, andy@genie.geis.com.
"[The author] neither accidentally nor intentionally omits or includes 
anything that could support a preconceived thesis." - C&EN 21-DEC-92 p.72
From: tron@Veritas.COM (Ronald S. Karr)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: One question about smail
Date: 25 Jan 93 09:02:01 GMT
Organization: VERITAS Software Corp.

In article <1287@kommu.UUCP> wp@orion.erls01.siemens.de writes:
>I have one question about smail's variables
>'version', 'compile_num' and the 'bat'.
>
>When I enter smail -V, I get
>
>/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.1
>
>But looking at the mail headers created by smail, inbound and outbound ones,
>they always looks like 
>
>Received: from erls01.siemens.de by orion.erls01.siemens.de with smtp
>        (Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0nEc3o-0004oiC; Wed, 20 Jan 93 10:49 MET
>
>for received mail and
>
>Received: by orion.erls01.siemens.de (Smail3.1.28.1 #1)
>        id m0nEg6b-0004ohC; Wed, 20 Jan 93 15:08 MET
>Message-Id: <m0nEg6b-0004ohC@orion.erls01.siemens.de>

When I introduced from ... by ... with ... into the Received header,
it became more difficult to keep the longer Smail version string in
the Received line without going to 3 lines or stretching past 80 columns
on a regular bassis.  So, I dropped the bat and the patch number.  I
figured that the patch number was part of the version number, anyway,
so it was redundant.  The remaining #1 is the compile number in your
compilation directory.  A future version will likely restore the bat,
since I will probably get forced into a three-line Received line,
anyway.

It is possible to get the bat and the patch number back, by setting
your own definition for the Received field.  You can set the variable
received_field to change this.
-- 
	tron |-<=>-|		ARPAnet:  veritas!tron@apple.com
      tron@veritas.com		UUCPnet:  {apple,pyramid}!veritas!tron
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com (John Schuch)
Subject: Re: Genie?
Organization: Motorola Computer Group, Tempe, Az.
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 02:13:31 GMT

In article <C1DrFG.LIz@ddsw1.mcs.com> dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (DWT) writes:
>schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com (John Schuch) wrote in
><1993Jan23.144543.5427@phx.mcd.mot.com>:
>
>| Is there a way to send mail to a user on Genie?
>
>If your friend on GEnie has paid to join the Internet email gateway, address
>mail to GEmailname@genie.geis.com; that's the email name, not the login ID.
>Current prices for the gateway (since 11/1/92) are $2 once to sign up and
>30c per 5000 characters or fraction thereof for both incoming and outgoing

GEEZE! I'll have to stop complaining about Compuserve's mail rates!

John

-- 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| John R. Schuch  -  Motorola Computer Group  -  Manufacturing Engineering |
| N7XVS - schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com - (602) 438-3008 - CompuServe: 70733.3330 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: cary@well.sf.ca.us (Cary Griffin)
Subject: X500 LDUA for Windows?
Summary: Is there an X.500 lightweight DUA for Windows?
Keywords: X500, X.500
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:25:02 GMT


Does anyone know of an X.500 lightweight directory user agent (LDUA) for
Windows on the PC?  We are currently using maX.500 from Univ of Mich on
the Mac but would like to find a similar program for the PC.  Pls reply here
or directly to me at cary@well.sf.ca.  Thanks
Cary Griffin
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: rs@cmie.ernet.in (Rajappa Iyer)
Subject: Re: How to "hide" large distributions in mail
Organization: Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, Bombay
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 10:17:03 GMT

bashamb@partial.cs.colorado.edu (BASHAM BRYAN DUANE) writes:

>I'm not a regular to this list, but I have a simple question: how
>can I hide (or rename) all of this addresses in my To: or Cc: lists?

There is no way I know of to hide the names of recipients specified
with To: and Cc:, but have you thought of using Bcc: ?


-- 
Rajappa Iyer			rs@cmie.ernet.in (Preferred)
				riyer@shakti.ncst.ernet.in
From: david@roth-music.com (David A. Roth)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: FIDONET, list of sites by location?
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 06:40:24 EST
Organization: DAVID A. ROTH MUSIC
Reply-To: david@roth-music.com (David A. Roth)
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.5v4


Many times people would like Internet access but don't have anything
local to them so I thought it might be a good idea to suggest a Fidonet
BBS to them since their connection to the Internet seems to be common
these days.

Thanks in advance!

David
david@roth-music.com
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (DWT)
Subject: Re: Genie?
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:50:01 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Contributor Account at ddsw1, Chicago, Illinois  60657

schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com (John Schuch) wrote in
<1993Jan23.144543.5427@phx.mcd.mot.com>:

| Is there a way to send mail to a user on Genie?

Depends on the user; it's an extra-cost option for which a GEnie user must
presubscribe.

| How?

If your friend on GEnie has paid to join the Internet email gateway, address
mail to GEmailname@genie.geis.com; that's the email name, not the login ID.
Current prices for the gateway (since 11/1/92) are $2 once to sign up and
30c per 5000 characters or fraction thereof for both incoming and outgoing
letters.  [For those of you hot to say that you read different rates, they
may have been the original ones: $9.95 per *month*, 40c per 5000 characters
in outgoing letters, no charge for incoming mail.]

GEnie's reply command does not work (last I checked) on mail that arrived
through the Internet gateway.  A response must be hand-addressed to 
user@site.domain@inet# -- yes, that's two "@"'s and a "#".  The "user@site.-
domain" part must be thirty-two characters or shorter, but GEnie knows that
that's a problem and it might be fixed some day.

Mail addressed through the gateway to the valid GEmail name of a GEnie user
who hasn't subscribed to the gateway (or who has quit it) will bounce.

David W. Tamkin   Box 59297   Northtown Station, Illinois  60659-0297
dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com    CompuServe: 73720,1570    MCI Mail: 426-1818
From: david@roth-music.com (David A. Roth)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: site info by e-mail service?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 05:22:09 EST
Organization: DAVID A. ROTH MUSIC
Reply-To: david@roth-music.com (David A. Roth)
Distribution: world
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.5v4


There use to be way to obtain site information from the UUCP maps
via 'lookup' with -s sitename in the Subject at Indiana University's
iuvax.  It's no longer there I guess.

Does this exists anyplace else? 

Thanks in advance!

David
david@roth-music.com
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc