HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ronp@dazixca.ingr.com (Ron Phillips)
Subject: Re: aids conference in cuba
Organization: DAZIX / An Intergraph Company
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 17:06:57 GMT

In article <Bs5p6D.9rC@apollo.hp.com> nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson) writes:
>
>  2.) The fact that doing this would require a Constitutional and 
>      major statutory changes, not to mention a major mindset change,
>      whereas aggressively attempting to develop a cure would not.
>      Cuba is a police state.  For a free country to take away 
>      your civil rights for the "crime" of being sick opens up a 
>      lot of scary doors.
>                  

What "Constitutional and major statutory changes" would be 
required?  The various state/county/municipal health codes allow
quarantine for potentially fatal diseases (smallpox, diptheria).
Why would the addition of AIDs infectees to the list of those
who can be quarantined require something different?

************************************************************
*Ron Phillips                        ronp@dazixca.ingr.com *
*Senior Customer Engineer                                  *
*DAZIX / An Intergraph Company                             *
*381 East Evelyn Avenue              VOICE: (415) 691-6473 *
*Mountain View, CA 94041             FAX:   (415) 691-0350 *
************************************************************
From: adams@spss.com (Steve Adams)
Subject: Re: Perot's October Surprise
Date: 21 Jul 92 16:40:14 GMT
Organization: SPSS Inc.

pearsodc@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Douglas C. Pearson) writes:

>P.S.  By the way, what do you guys make of Clintons 30-point lead in the  
>polls, besides the fact that it's only July?

That Clinton will win one of the most massive popular landslides of all
time...Bush can hardly do anything to recover at this point...if the
economy was going to come back and save him, it would have to have started 
by now...and the indidcators don't look so good...

I can just see the Clinton commercials playing the 'read my lips' stuff...
And pointing out that unemployment is high...and going higher..

 -Steve
--
 The opinions expressed above are those of the author and not SPSS, Inc.
                        -------------------
     adams@spss.com                           Phone: (312) 329-3522
     Steve Adams                              Fax:   (312) 329-3558
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.elections
From: pswanson@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Paul Swanson)
Subject: Re: Question about Clinton's "didn't inhale" remark
Originator: news@ernie.Princeton.EDU
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 01:18:10 GMT

In article <3442@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> psg+@pitt.edu (Paul S Galvanek) writes:
>
>The Republicans and the NEA?? HA HA!
>
Hey, don't laugh so quickly there.  In the last elections here the New Jersey
Education Association (NJEA) supported the Republicans because the
Republicans were opposed to the governor's regionalization education
plan.  Basically the NJEA appears to want as many school districts as
possible so that they can go to the bargaining table saying 'look how
much those teachers are making over there'.  In order to thank the
NJEA the Repulicans promptly passed a bill to create a pension fund for
part time school employees such as bus drivers and cafeteria workers.

Paul.
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
From: nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson)
Subject: when in trouble, when in doubt . . . 
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 17:02:34 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Chelmsford, MA



   Does anyone find it the least bit *NOT* surprising that Mr.
   Bush is suddenly putting the military on alert and threatening
   a new war with Iraq just now when the Democrats seem to have
   found a new life and Bush/Quayle is being hammered in the polls
   by Clinton/Gore?    

   I'm not suggesting that the Iraqis are blameless, or that they're
   not being especially provocative just now, but from the Republican's
   perspective wouldn't this be a really good time to have a war?   


---peter

Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.folklore.urban
From: archer@utkux1.utk.edu (T. Archer)
Subject: Re: Vacation Time!
Keywords: Ditch Day, vanishing room
Organization: University of Tennessee Division of Continuing Education
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 17:50:46 GMT

In article <BruGv9.2B7@apollo.hp.com> nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson) writes:


>   I'm glad I got through college without ever having to deal with any
>   of this infantile bullshit.   Nevermind the way it reinforces, and 
>   invents where necessary, even *more* stupid group allegiances, identities,
>   obligations and similar stuff that our society already has too much of.   

>   If anyone in college had ever tried anything like that on me I'd have
>   had them in court for wasting my time/tuition, interfering in my 
>   education, destruction of property, assault, or whatever else was
>   appropriate, faster than you could say "Perry Mason".  

Oh, I'll bet you're FUN at parties.

-=-=-
T. Archer  PA142548@utkvm1.utk.edu
University of Tennessee
"Vote Dempublican, it's easier than thinking." -- Unknown
-=-=-
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Which of you is 'good enough' ?
From: demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man)
Date: 20 Jul 92 23:40:39 EST
Distribution: usa
Organization: Demonic Possesions, Inc.
Summary: You bet I inhaled, and from what I can remember, I enjoyed it :)

In article <1992Jul20.195741.27981@bnr.ca>, snoopy@crchh426.BNR.CA (Antonio Tello) writes:
> Just out of curiosity...
> 
> Could my fellow 'netters' answer these two questions (please post)
> 
> 1) how old are you ?

	I will soon celebrate the 4th anniversary of my 25th birthday.

> 
> 2) could your history survive the media scrutiny required to be
>    elected president ?

	Let's see...there was that 17 year old girl, my association with a girl
who's mother contributes to the Shining Path guerillas, that little problem
with the speed limit, ummm....probably.

Brett                                                      
_______________________________________________________________________________
Proconsul Computer Consulting                                        CHA-CHING!
Better, Cheaper, Faster					       (Pick any two :)
Disclaimer:								   NOT!
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:34956 alt.politics.clinton:120
From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
Subject: Re: Ted Frank's Predictions for the election 
Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 00:01:39 GMT

In article <ATAYLOR.92Jul21151409@gauss.nmsu.edu> ataylor@nmsu.edu (Nosy) writes:
><In article <1992Jul13.235648.23026@midway.uchicago.edu> thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank) writes:
>
><   4. Perot drops out, deciding not to run after all.  Could happen, but I
><      doubt it, Perot's protestations to the contrary. 
> 
>	Crack in the old crystal ball, Ted?

Hey, it's your own fault for reading the entire post.

FWIW, I was running Clinton-Bush simulations on an old President Elect '88
computer game.  With 0.5% economic growth, 7.6% unemployment, 3.2% inflation,
and a country mood of (Peace - 4), it was a close election; Clinton wins
when he doesn't make gaffes (the game gives him a very low composure rating
for some reason), loses (sometimes by a landslide) when he does.  Of course
this doesn't include any Quayle factor, and is based on 1988 statistics
(and 1984 politics).  (I broke into the game-data to change Bush's state
from "Connecticut" to "Texas."  Neither's particularly accurate, but other-
wise it showed Clinton sweeping the South, which is unreasonable.)
-- 
                      ....................................
                      ted frank | thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
                      the university of chicago law school 
                      official member of the cultural elit
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
From: myhui@bnr.ca (Michael Hui)
Subject: Re: Bush/Baker Ticket??
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa, Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 23:58:37 GMT

In article <adams.711833042@spssig> adams@spss.com (Steve Adams) writes:
>jbutterf@mal-s1.gatech.edu (Jill Butterfield) writes:
>>There's a rumor going around here that Baker's first task to help
>>out the Bush campaign is to kick Quayle out, and that Baker plans
>>on running for VP.
>
>Such a move would give the Democrats even more ammunition.  

Ammunition, yes, and we've heard the first salvos already. But IMHO the
Dems could try an outrageous maneuver here: praise James Baker III as a
smothie and a capable operator on the world scene, and offer him a job
in the same post in the next administration, if he promises to stay on
the job till the end.
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.clinton
From: mike@gordian.com (Michael A. Thomas)
Subject: Re: Which of you is 'good enough' ?
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Gordian; Costa Mesa, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 03:20:06 GMT

  Where do they all come from? Is Bob Jones doing night courses these
days for the overload?

In article <3-gmhf_.crisp@netcom.com>, crisp@netcom.com (Richard Crisp) writes:
> Finally homosexuality is a perversion, is immoral, is contrary to 
> the teachings of the Bible and those that engage in such practices
> typically are diseased both in the body and in mind. They carry 
> numerous infectious diseases including AIDS and other veneral 
> diseases, have higher rates of hepatitis etc, etc. These people
> are mentally depraved and are in need of psychiatric help.

  Uh, Rich? Stick your bible up your ass. And while it's there
fuck yourself with it.
-- 

		Michael Thomas	(mike@gordian.com)
	"I don't think Bambi Eyes will get you that flame thrower..."  
		-- Hobbes to Calvin
		USnail: 20361 Irvine Ave Santa Ana Heights, Ca,	92707-5637
		PaBell: (714) 850-0205 (714) 850-0533 (fax)
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:35735 alt.politics.clinton:610
From: glambert@pyramid.com (George Lambert)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: Which of you is 'good enough' ?
Date: 23 Jul 92 21:33:43 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Pyramid Technology

In article <lzfmyk.crisp@netcom.com> crisp@netcom.com (Richard Crisp) writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.004331.15705@news.Hawaii.Edu> johnf@uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu (John Flanagan) writes:
>>I wrote:
>>
>>>Hell, girl, my history couldn't survive the scrutiny required to teach
>>>high-school in most states.  Nothing _I'm_ ashamed of, but not good PR
>>>material in this year of "family values."
>>
>>P.S. -- This is why I'm voting for Clinton.  I consider George Bush's
>>stance on gay rights, and human/civil rights generally, to be immoral.
>
>
>Others like me consider homosexuality to be immoral, illegal and 
>disgusting. I believe the majority of Americans agree with me.
>
Here's one who's repulsed by such unfounded hatred, Dickie-boy.

George Lambert
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:35761 alt.politics.elections:9081 misc.legal:14761
From: mmh@cs.qmw.ac.uk (Matthew Huntbach)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.elections,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Perot and that dang Constitution
Date: 24 Jul 92 11:21:21 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Dept, QMW, University of London, UK.

From: hallam@zeus02.desy.de (Phillip M. Hallam-Baker)
>There are no particular tensions between the various countries. There is
>however a major North/ South divide where the South East, mainly Tory
>held affluent areas are considered to be spongers by the poorer,
>industialised, wealth creating North.

How can we in the South-East of England be spongers, when
what the northerners are basically asking for is that we pay higher
taxes so that they can have bigger handouts? As for
wealth-creation, Britain these days is just about kept afloat
by southern-based invisible earnings, not the northern
rustbucket industries.

Matthew Huntbach
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:35185 alt.politics.clinton:199
From: crisp@netcom.com (Richard Crisp)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: Question about Clinton's "didn't inhale" remark
Date: 22 Jul 92 07:42:17 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <1992Jul21.032844.824@news.Hawaii.Edu> blais@milo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Kristin Blais) writes:
>I can tell you another thing about him- Mr. Crisp is NOT from the 
>South otherwise he would know how *unusual* it is in the South to 
>elect a governer for more than 4 years. In the history of the 
>state of Arkansas there have only been two other governers
>elected for more than 4 years and one of them was basically
>post Civil War demogogue who fought against the carpetbaggers.
>Bill Clinton has severed 11 years as Governer, that alone
>should tell you what the people of Arkansas think about Bill 
>Clinton. (Until his last term they were two year terms
>they changed them to four year terms for him)
>Kristin

Sorry baby, I be from Texas originally (slang intended). When you
assume, you make an ass of you and me.

-- 
Richard Crisp         Cupertino, Ca.         crisp@netcom.com
(415) 903-3832 wk    "what, me worry?"    (408) 253 4541 fax

"The first thing you have to do is disarm the people. A disarmed
public can't fight back" -Adolf Hitler
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.clinton
From: ataylor@nmsu.edu (Nosy)
Subject: Waiting for Shore....(Was: Which of you is 'good enough' ?)
Organization: NMSU Computer Science
	<vhfmzz-.crisp@netcom.com> <1992Jul22.135932.16194@tc.cornell.edu>
	<1992Jul23.022427.1893@anasazi.com>
	<1992Jul23.145230.17221@tc.cornell.edu>
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 15:52:12 GMT

<In article <1992Jul23.145230.17221@tc.cornell.edu> shore@dinah.tc.cornell.edu (Melinda Shore) writes:
<   In article <1992Jul23.022427.1893@anasazi.com>, john@anasazi.com (John R. Moore) writes:
<   > Not only that, the republicans are responsible for the floods caused
<   > by El Nino, the explosion of Mt. Pinatubo, and the California
<   > Earthquakes. Hey - let's face it - everything is the fault of
<   > Ronald Reagan and George Bush!

<   How utterly disingenuous.  ReaganBush *did* dismantle
<   social programs, 

	Still waiting for Shore to post which programs were
	abolished, i.e. "dismantled".

	Well? 	

	Are facts all that difficult for Shore to post?

Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
From: barrett@cloudgen1.gatech.edu (James Barrett)
Subject: More Spy reasons not to vote for Bush
Organization: Georgia Tech College of Computing
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 00:27:45 GMT


21.  "We are going to paint Clinton as a man out of control, who can't 
control his zipper, can't control his wife and can't control his waistline" 
- a senior advisor.

22.  The cost of a photo op with Bush at an April 1992 fundraiser was $92,000.

23.  BUSH SIGNALS CAUTIOUS CAMPAIGN - LA Times, June 2, 1988.

24.  BUSH PLANS TO CONTINUE CATIOUS SOVIET POLICY - Washington Post, 
January 20, 1989.

25.  BUSH CAUTIOUS ON ANTI-INFLATION STEPS - NY Times, Jan 26, 1989.

26.  AT CEREMONY FOR CHENEY, BUSH CAUTIOUS ON CUTS - Wash Post, Mar 22, 1989.

27.  CAUTIOUS PATH FOR BUSH'S EUROPE TRIP - Times, May 26, 1989.

28.  BUSH CAUTIOUS BUT FIRM ON CHINA - USA Today, June 9, 1989.

29.  EAST BLOC CHANGES HAILED; BUT BUSH IS CAUTIOUS ON BID BY GORBACHEV - 
Wash Post, July 17, 1989.

30.  BUSH "ENCOURAGED" BY RAFSANJANI OFFER BUT BUT TAKES CAUTIOUS STANCE - 
LA Times, Aug 6, 1989.

31.  BUSH CAUTIOUS ON FURTHER AID TO POLAND - LA Times, Sept 28, 1989.

32.  ON PANAMA, BUSH CHARACTERISTICALLY CAUTIOUS - Wash Post, Oct 15, 1989.

33.  BUSH IS CAUTIOUS ON DOMESTIC GOALS - Times, Feb 1, 1990.

34.  BUSH IS CAUTIOUS ON GLOBAL WARMING - USA Today, Feb 5, 1990.

35.  BUSH TALKS IN SF, URGES "CAUTIOUS" DEFENSE CUTS - San Francisco Chronicle, Feb 8, 1990.

36.  BUSH YIELDS TO AN IMPULSE TO STAY CAUTIOUS ABOUT THE SOVIETS - Times, 
Feb 11, 1990.

37.  BUSH DEFENDS CAUTIOUS LITHUANIA POLICY - LA Times, March 29, 1990.

38.  AT INTERNATIONAL MEETING, BUSH CAUTIOUS ON GLOBAL WARMING - Boston Globe, 
April 18, 1990.

39.  BUSH REMAINS CAUTIOUS ON BALTIC EVENTS - Wash Post, Jan 12, 1991.

40.  THE CAUTIOUS BUSH BUDGET IS A NO-RISK CAMPAIGN PLAN - Atlanta Constitution, Feb 7, 1991.

41.  CONDOMS IN CLASS; BUSH IS CAUTIOUS - Washington Times, April 19, 1991.

42.  BAILING OUT SOVIETS: BUSH IS CAUTIOUS - Times, June 12, 1991.
------------------OS/2 v2.0 -- Why settle for anything less?--------------------
James C. Barrett (barrett@cc.gatech.edu)| "If your so damned smart, why are
Georgia Tech College of Computing       |   you doing what your doing, and I'm
                                        |   president of the U.S.?" - G.Bush
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.clinton
From: matt@physics2.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Bush's mom
Date: 21 Jul 92 21:52:15 GMT
Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Theoretical Physics Group)
NNTP-Posting-Host: physics2.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: rja@redwood26.cray.com's message of 21 Jul 92 15:20:44 CDT

In article <1992Jul21.152044.1557@hemlock.cray.com> rja@redwood26.cray.com (Russ Anderson) writes:

> Which leads me to wonder if George, in his second term, will 
> do another flip-flop on abortion.  He won't have to worry
> about keeping the right wing happy.  He'll be free to do
> what he really believes.

Is there any evidence that Bush "really believes" anything?
--
Matthew Austern              I dreamt I was being followed by a roving band of
(510) 644-2618               of young Republicans, all wearing the same suit,
matt@physics.berkeley.edu    taunting me and shouting, "Politically correct
austern@theorm.lbl.gov       multiculturist scum!"... They were going to make
austern@lbl.bitnet	     me kiss Jesse Helms's picture when I woke up.
From: jbutterf@mal-s1.gatech.edu (Jill Butterfield)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Bush/Baker Ticket??
Date: 22 Jul 92 18:22:37 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Georgia Tech Res. Inst., Modeling & Analysis Lab


There's a rumor going around here that Baker's first task to help
out the Bush campaign is to kick Quayle out, and that Baker plans
on running for VP.

Has anyone else heard this? It could really add another interesting
dimension to this already topsy-turvy race.

jib
-- 
Jill Butterfield, Research Scientist       EMAIL: jbutterf@mal-s1.gatech.edu
Georgia Institute of Technology, GTRI Modeling and Analysis Lab
"Happiness is excitement that has found a settling down place..."
-E.L. Konigsburg, _From the Mixed-up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler_
From: sunder@altair.crhc.uiuc.edu (Srinivas Sunder)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Thoughts on '92
Date: 27 Jul 1992 19:06:06 GMT
Organization: Center for Reliable and High-Performance Computing, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: altair.crhc.uiuc.edu

In article <1992Jul27.184516.1064@Csli.Stanford.EDU>, mmarx@Csli.Stanford.EDU (Matthew Marx) writes:
|> In <16831BB14.MEDELMA@cms.cc.wayne.edu> MEDELMA@cms.cc.wayne.edu (Michael Edelman) writes:
|> 
|> >>>The only reason that Clinton won out over Tsongas is that he was willing
|> >>>to put his campaign in deeper debt than Tsongas was.
|> >>
|> >Does anyone really doubt that Clinton won over Tsongas because he was simply
|> >more attractive and doesn't sound like Elmer Fudd? There were no issues
|> >discussed in the primary. There were no debates. It was all image.
|> > 
|> 
|> Wait...doesn't anyone remember the debate? Maybe Clinton wasn't there.
|> Oh well. Even so, I think there was more to Tsongas' downfall than
|> image; his blunt honesty and somewhat radical programs (flat tax, et

The flat tax was Jerry Brown's idea, not Tsongas's. Tsongas's ideas included
a 5 cents-a-year gas tax for a decade (for a total of 50 cents a gallon),
as well as a Cap gains tax CUT, AND some social security cuts or caps. If
I remember right, enough people wrote-in his name in the GOP primary in
New Hampshire to make him come third in the GOP Primary.

|> Matt Marx    mmarx@csli.stanford.edu  

-- 
Srinivas Sunder                                         sunder@crhc.uiuc.edu

If my employer shares these opinions, he deserves them.
********************************************************************************
From: udcrusd@meaddata.com (Sylvia D'Cruz)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Polls
Date: 24 Jul 1992 16:38:33 GMT
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: altair.crhc.uiuc.edu


     1,030 registered voters surveyed 7/17-19; margin of error
+/- 3% (Harris release, 7/21).
                                                            7/88
2-WAY     ALL   EAST   MIDWEST  SOUTH  WEST   MALE  FEMALE  ALL
Clinton   63%   64%      60%     64%   66%    60%    67%    60%
Bush      33    29       38      34    31     37     30     36
Not sure   3     6        2       2     3      3      3      4

          WHT  BLK  HISP.  GOP  DEM  IND  CONS.  MOD.  LIB
Clinton   59%  95%   71%   32%  89%  63%   45%   69%   89%
Bush      38    2    27    66   10   31    51    28    10
Not sure   3    3     2     2    2    6     3     4     1

         18-24  25-29  30-39  40-49  50-64  OVER 64   OVER $50K
Clinton   74%    68%    59%    69%    59%     60%        56%
Bush      25     30     39     28     38      34         41
Not sure   2      3      2      3      4       6          3

STRENGTH OF SUPPORT     BUSH    CLINTON
Very strongly            29%       37%
Somewhat strongly        47        43
Not very strongly        24        18

                                    CLINTON    BUSH
CLINTON'S ACCEPTANCE SPEECH   ALL   BACKERS   BACKERS
Better than expected          38%     42%       28%
As expected                   58      55        65
Worse than expected            3       2         6

-- 
Sylvia D. D'Cruz
From: mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin)
Subject: Re: Hate Speech Okay, says the Supreme Court
Followup-To: rec.arts.books
Originator: mnemonic@eff.org
Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 00:47:19 GMT

In article <1992Jul24.135134.19669@Princeton.EDU> egnilges@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ed Nilges) writes:

>Shakespeare
>portrays Shylock as a comic villain and although the portrayal is deeper
>and more nuanced than other Elizabethan portrayals of Jews, owing to
>Shakespeare's genius, a comic villain is different in kind from the
>tragic hero that Othello is.

It is no comic villain who asks, "If you prick us do we not bleed?"
Shylock is not a "more nuanced" comic villain--he's not a comic
villain at all.


--Mike







-- 
Mike Godwin,     |"Of the many definitions of poetry, the   
mnemonic@eff.org | simplest is still the best: 'memorable speech.'" 
(617) 864-0665   | 
EFF, Cambridge   |                     --W.H. Auden 
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:35588 alt.politics.elections:9023 alt.politics.perot:1053 alt.mcdonalds.smut:5 alt.fan.dan-quayle:2019 alt.politics.marrou:141
From: martha@gvlf7-o.gvl.unisys.com (Martha Sherman)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.perot,alt.mcdonalds.smut,alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.marrou
Subject: Re: Farewell Perot
Date: 23 Jul 92 18:35:47 GMT
Organization: Paramax Systems, Great Valley Labs, Paoli, Pa

In article <22JUL92.15386207.0024@MUSIC.TCS.TULANE.EDU> TCWS000 <TCWS@MUSIC.TCS.TULANE.EDU> writes:
>
>by the way, did you also read n USA today that even Dominos Pizza
>is trying to register voters? Yes, they will let you register with
>the driver when he/she delivers the pizza to your door (in 30 minutes
>or less of course). You get a free topping on your pizza when you
>register... I am not making this up....
>
>Bill Sirinek (Tulane University, New Orleans, LA)
>
>-Saddam still has his job, do you?
>


Since Dominos Pizza is a major contributor/supporter of the 'Right To Life'
movement, I wouldn't be surprised if they toss out all of the Democratic party
registrations they make.


Martha H. Sherman
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I speak only for myself, and sometimes I even wonder about that...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------