HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: paraska@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Pete Paraska)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Re: new Integra
Date: 19 Aug 92 20:33:49 GMT
Reply-To: paraska@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Peter Paraska)
Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD

I've seen references in either C&D and/or R&T about a total redesign
of the Integra due out in the spring of 93.  You might want to wait
and see what it's like.  I hope they go towards the original design
which I thought was a lot nicer to drive (I (well, my wife) had an 88).
|/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////|
| Pete Paraska (paraska@oasys.dt.navy.mil)                      (301)-227-1650|
| David Taylor Model Basin, CARDEROCKDIV, NSWC                                |
|\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\|
Newsgroups: rec.autos
From: jimf@centerline.com (Jim Frost)
Subject: Re: Stealth? NOT!
Organization: CenterLine Software, Inc.
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 18:02:11 GMT

In article <1992Aug13.233607.16906@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, 
ac579@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (G.C.J. Timm) writes:
> But according to the Car Rags, black cars DO have smaller
> radar signatures.

Really?  Which car rags are those?

Lidar signatures, yes.  IR is close enough to visible light that
visible pigmentation is likely to affect it.  But radar?  I think the
car rags you read are having bouts of wishful thinking (maybe they've
read too many articles on the Stealth Bomber).  The car's construction
will have a lot more effect on the radar signature than its paint,
assuming of course that they didn't start developing radar-absorbant
paint while I wasn't paying attention.

jim frost
jimf@centerline.com
From: paul@eye.com (Paul B. Booth)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Legacy brake rotors?
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 15:09:44 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: 3D/EYE, Inc.  Ithaca, NY

I've got a '91 Subaru Legacy, approx 12k on the clock, that's developed a
severe case of brake-pedal rumble whenever I hit the brakes.  Sounds a whole
lot like warped rotors (at 12k miles?), so I take it to the dealer and am told
that rotors for the legacy are on "national backorder" (whatever that is), and
that it will be 2-3 weeks before new ones are available.  I'm told today, after
waiting 2 weeks, that another 2-3 week delay is expected, and that this _may_
be because of a real problem with legacy rotors....

Does anybody out there have any info on a serious warpage problem with the
Legacy rotors?  Anybody else have this problem?

Thanks!

-- 
Paul B. Booth  (paul@eye.com)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3D/EYE, Inc., 2359 N. Triphammer Rd., Ithaca, NY  14850    voice: (607)257-1381
                                                             fax: (607)257-7335
Xref: sparky rec.autos:20324 misc.forsale:24154
X-Star-Trek-Quote: He's Dead Jim.
X-School: Penn State University
X-Nickname: <<APOCALYPSE>>, Lord of Destruction
Organization: Penn State Star Trek club
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 13:29:19 EDT
From: Matthew E. Bernold <MEB117@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.autos,misc.forsale
Subject: Car sterio for sale.

I have a Realistic model 12-1930A car sterio for sale.  Here are all the
specs I could find:

     AM/FM/Sterio/Cassette player
     Auto reverse
     5 band graphic equalizer
     4-speaker system
     L-R/F-R faders
     Digital display
     12 memories (6 AM/6 FM)
     Auto seek
     Metal tape switch
     Wire for auto antenna

The dimensions are HxWxD  2"x7"x5 3/4"

I paid $149.99 for it about 2.5 years ago.  I'll take $75 shipping included,
o.b.o. (buyer pays shipping)

       Matthew E. Bernold             MEB117@PSUVM.PSU.EDU
         <<APOCALYPSE>>                  meb@haydn.psu.edu
From: breese@digi.lonestar.org (Bryan Reese)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Re: T-Bird turbo coupe
Date: 12 Aug 92 19:17:46 GMT
Organization: DSC Communications Corp, Plano, TX

In article <1992Aug11.191039.27241@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> awds_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Man Of Steel) writes:
>I'm experiencing a problem with my '88 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe.
>This problem seems to have started very soon after I had
>the engine bay cleaned(water only, while engine ran).
>
>When the car is first started, everything is fine.  Idles around 1000 rpm,
>accelerates normally, etc.  After it is warm, the first time I try 
>hard acceleration, my boost guage will go all the way up to about 15psi,
>then I can hear the engine knock, then boost is restrained back to 7-9 psi.
>Now, on engine deceleration, throttle return is much slower(takes longer
>to return to lower rpms), and idle becomes around 1500-1800 rpm.  I always
>run 92+ octane unleaded, and am certain it's not fuel quality.  I have a feeling it could be a knock sensor which was wet during cleaning, but I'm worried
>about big $ diagnostics.       
>
>	Has anyone ever experienced this?  I you have any ideas, please
>post or email me.  
>	Also, can anyone suggest a decent shop manual?  I'm interested
>in one which is specific to the Turbo Coupe, if one exists.  Thanks
>
>awds_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu
>  
>
>    

I've had a similar problem with my 88' T-Bird Turbo Coupe.  I'm
not sure about the turbo problem, but I have seen the high idle
problem.  I've seen it in my car and in a friends 88' T-Bird
Turbo Coupe.  Other symptoms of the high idle is a surging
idle.

We have both suffered with the problem off and on for the past
couple of years.  It is very inconsistent.  I haven't seen the
problem since the last time I took my car in for repairs.

I brought my car in for a cold start problem.  They
did alot of work on my car, at no cost to me, so I can't really
give you a cost.  Some of the things that they did are (from
memory): replaced the TP sensor, replaced the vain flow meter,
a sylonoid, cleaned the throttle body, cleaned the injectors 
(I run 92+ Chevron), and a lot of diagnostics.

Everytime I brought my car in for the high idle, they could
never find anything wrong.  Usually in the case of our cars, if
you turn the car off and then on, it would clear the problem.

I know it may not be much help, but it is an indication that if
it is the same problem we have, it may be hard to find.

FYI and any comments and opinions:  They never fixed my cold
start problem.  They said my 53000 mile car, running 92+
Chevron has carbon buildup on the valves.  We all had a problem
beleiving that one.

Hope it helps
Bryan
Lines: 15
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 92 07:03:40 MDT
From: earlyd@ee.byu.edu (David Early)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Distribution: world
Organization: Brigham Young University, Provo UT USA
Subject: Shelby Dodge


Now that I have gotten my first question about Z cars answered, I
will post a queston from a friend of mine who helps me with the
body work on these cars:

He owns two Shelby Dodge cars, one is a Shadow.  Unfortunatly
that is all I know about the cars, except one has a 2.2L intercooled
turbo engine.

His question:  How an he improve engine performance (I think
he is talking speed and power, not necessarily fuel economy).
Any other experience/information/contacts would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks Dave Early
Newsgroups: rec.autos
From: virgo@metter.fmpmis.metter.com (curious vIRgO)
Subject: Laser RS Turbo...C/D's Best Bang for the Buck Winner...
Summary: I dunno... I still like my V6 Acclaim.
Keywords: Or are they mistaken in all this???
Organization: Metters Industries, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 13:07:42 GMT


Hello, fellow auto-philes:

Many of you,I am sure, have already read Car&Driver's latest issue and are
aware that this year's "Best Bang for the Buck" was the Plymouth Laser RS
Turbo. So, any ideas?? Comments??? Opinions???? Flames?????

Also, I canna' understand why C/D always throws a car out of class(price,
model,etc.)in with a group of cars that are pretty much the same in class.
First, it was the SHO Taurus against the Maxima SE/Camry SE. THIS time,they
put,what I consider,affordable sports/GT models adn then throw the curve
by smooshing in a Mazda RX-7 R1(then again, I may be screaming for naught,
I canna' remember the price for this car, but I assume it's WAY out of league
with the others...please correct me if I'm wrong, and spouting off for
naught...again).

curious"Ever know of a '74 240Z that can do 160 mph,stock??"virgo
-- 

Paul "Axel" Virgo
Metters Industries
Arlington, VA 22202
Xref: sparky rec.autos:20280 rec.autos.driving:5023 rec.autos.sport:9005 rec.autos.tech:11390 rec.autos.vw:4786
From: dafuller@sequent.com (David Fuller)
Newsgroups: rec.autos,rec.autos.driving,rec.autos.sport,rec.autos.tech,rec.autos.vw
Subject: Re: reliable cars
Date: 20 Aug 92 03:38:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: sequent.1992Aug20.033849.11769
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc.

Hey, wait a minute here.  This is a RACING group, not a go-slow group.

If you're not into turbos or nitrous injection, go away!  (Please?)
-- 
Dave Fuller		 	All opinions expressed are my own and not
Sequent Computer Systems	those of Sequent Computer Systems, Inc.
dafuller@sequent.com
Xref: sparky rec.autos:20357 rec.autos.driving:5046 rec.autos.sport:9052 rec.autos.tech:11466 rec.autos.vw:4814
From: daviesb@gtephx.UUCP (Barry Davies)
Newsgroups: rec.autos,rec.autos.driving,rec.autos.sport,rec.autos.tech,rec.autos.vw
Subject: Re: reliable cars
Date: 20 Aug 92 15:38:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: gtephx.1992Aug20.153818.14648
Organization: AG Communication Systems, Phoenix, Arizona

In article <1992Aug18.155734.3591@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, mas6d@uvacs.cs.Virginia.EDU (M. Anne Shackelford) writes:
> I am graduating from school and am interested in purchasing a small reliable car
> - preferably hatchback.
> 
> Do you have recommendations of cars to consider buying and cars to consider NOT
> buying.
> 

After its performance during the last two years, I would highly recommend
a Williams F14. If you are looking for something a little cheaper,
a Benneton would be quite good too, and the Lotus 107 is showing 
much promise.
Further down the scale, a Footwork has shown much reliability as a good
get-you-around-the-circuit-safely-but-not-in-time-for-the-podium-party
sort of car.

Definitely stay away from Andrea Modas, Dallaras and Ligiers.

Ferraris are OK if you can pick up an older model, say 3 years old.

Hope this helps,

Barry

(Sorry - just couldn't resist!)


> 
> Thanks,

Anytime

> 
> Anne
> mas6d@cs.virginia.edu


-- 
To the extent that I have any opinions, these are mine, not AG Communication Systems.
Inet: gtephx!daviesb@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
*Ceasar aderat  forte, Brutus aderam Ceasar sic in omnibus, Brutus sic in tram*
 - Liverpool University ragmag, circa 1970
Newsgroups: rec.autos
From: synth@deepthought.unm.edu (Synth F. Oberheim)
Subject: Re: INTEGRA SUSPENSION.
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 18:10:24 GMT
Organization: SynthMedia Productions Ltd.: The Danes Call It Quality


ss@wpi.WPI.EDU (Scott Streeter) writes:

>>>> On 19 Aug 92 00:32:00 GMT, erich.lim@cutting.hou.tx.us (Erich Lim) said:

lim> Well, you probably should replace the struts since factory ones
lim> start giving way at about 20,000 miles 

Scott> Well if this is the case, how can you tell the struts have given way.
Scott> I have 33K on my 89 LS, and the ride is still fine, as far as I can
Scott> tell.

The main symptom I look for is the behavior of the car when you go over a
a short, sharp dip or bump at moderate to high speed (30+ mph): does the
car become unsettled, slightly losing its straight-line direction, causing
you to correct with the steering wheel?  Does this instability feel
downright dangerous at higher speeds (50+ mph)?  It is -- if your shocks
and struts are bad enough, this instability can potentially cause you
to lose control if the road surface is poor enough.  With good struts
and shocks, you can drive over a harsh surface and not feel like you're
fighting the car to keep it straight.


===============================================================================
    :: :: :: :: ::     Synth F.    synth@deepthought.unm.edu    U S E N E T   
 :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  Oberheim    synth@yenta.alb.nm.us             in color!
===============================================================================
"A dozen pizzas?  Oh, it's those damn KIDS!"
Newsgroups: rec.autos,rec.autos.driving,rec.autos.sport,rec.autos.tech,rec.autos.vw
From: rmc1862@tm0006.lerc.nasa.gov (Rodger M. Cliff)
Subject: Re: Stealth? NOT!
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center / Cleveland, Ohio
Date: 12 Aug 1992 18:44 EST  

In article <2en603ry59Mp00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>, fierro@uts.amdahl.com (Doug Fierro) writes...
>>
>>>Is it just me, or are bright red "Stealth" cars a major Unclear on the Concept?
> 
>  Well, stealth technology has to do with evading radar detection, not 
>cop detection :-), so the color shouldn't make too much of a difference
>either way to a radar.

Stealth refers to the ability to evade survielance (sp?).  The stealth bomber 
technology use radar absorbing materials, but also ducts cooler air into the 
exhaust to minimize infra-red emissions/detection.  Color is less important, 
because of the speed it travels ("enemy's" ability to react visual survielance).
For cars, stealth considerations involve radar (detector, microwave absorbing 
materials, car front end design), lasers (LIDAR detector, car color, special 
car bras), and visual (color of car, make/model of car, minimal visible after-
market modifications).
My stealth vehicle is a 1980 Olds Cutlass 4-dr, dark green, vinyl top, 
white sidewall tires (225/70r-15 though), and wire rim hubcaps.  Looks like
something that only an old man would drive.  Internals (not visible) include
a modified 350 cu.in. engine, a good approximation of a police suspension, and
a X/K/Ka radar detector.  Future mods include a T400 trans, a 403 engine, a 
X/K/Ka wideband radar detector, a LIDAR detector, and a Police repeater detector
 I didn't opt for the radar absorbing car bra because it would work against the 
visual stealth features.  My observation is that the police use ambush tactics;
therefore visual stealth and a radar detector give me more protection than the 
car bras.  I drive about 120 miles a day and I also own a sports car, so I take
speeding tickets seriously.
________________________________________________________________________________
Rodger Cliff                         |  
Analex Corporation                   |            My opinions
at NASA Lewis Research Center        |     are not those of Analex or NASA
Cleveland, OH                        |          and definitely not
                                     |             vice-versa!
(216) 433-8826                       |
________________________________________________________________________________
From: hhd0@newshost.gte.com (Horace Dediu)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Re: Blue Book prices for 190 MB
Date: 19 Aug 92 16:28:50 GMT
Organization: GTE Laboratories, Waltham, MA

In article <1992Aug18.094908.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu>, kpjone01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
|> Anyone have the blue book prices for an 85-86 MB 190?
|>  
|> Thanks.
|>  
|> Kevin
|> KPJONE01@ULKYVX.CT.LOUISVILLE.EDU

As of first quarter '92:
1985 
190E: Finance: 7875, Whsl: 8750, Retail: 10650  Orig. MSRP: 22850
190D:          6705        7450          9350		    22930
1986
190E:          9720       10800          12850              23700
190D:          8550        9500          11550              23700
190E16V:      14490       16100          18400              34800

-- 
Horace Dediu                                                  GTE Laboratories
(617) 466-4111                                                40 Sylvan Road
Internet: hdediu@gte.com                                      Waltham, MA 02254
From: rmc1862@tm0006.lerc.nasa.gov (Rodger M. Cliff)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Re: Stealth? NOT!
Date: 17 Aug 92 18:02:00 GMT
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center / Cleveland, Ohio
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Aug14.182046.15921@koko.csustan.edu>, james@koko.csustan.edu (Jonas Grumpy) writes...
>In article <jimf.713815331@centerline.com> jimf@centerline.com (Jim Frost) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug13.233607.16906@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, 
>>ac579@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (G.C.J. Timm) writes:
>>> But according to the Car Rags, black cars DO have smaller
>>> radar signatures.

Probably because most black paints are non-metallic.

>>Lidar signatures, yes.  IR is close enough to visible light that
>>visible pigmentation is likely to affect it.  But radar?  I think the
>>car rags you read are having bouts of wishful thinking (maybe they've
>>read too many articles on the Stealth Bomber).  The car's construction
>>will have a lot more effect on the radar signature than its paint,
>>assuming of course that they didn't start developing radar-absorbant
>>paint while I wasn't paying attention.

There supposedly is microwave absorbing paint; it just has to be several
millimeters thick to work.

>What about metallic colors versus arcrylic enamel. I think the metallic
>flakes would increase the radar sig.

A few years ago, I talked with the then sales manager at Innovisions Research 
(makers of the stealth car bra) and he said that their research indicated a 
smaller radar profile with non-metallic paints, even on steel bodied cars.
________________________________________________________________________________
Rodger Cliff                         |  
Analex Corporation                   |            My opinions
at NASA Lewis Research Center        |     are not those of Analex or NASA
Cleveland, OH                        |          and definitely not
                                     |             vice-versa!
(216) 433-8826                       |
________________________________________________________________________________
From: crash@hal.com (Chris Craddock)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Re: Lotus Elan vs Mercury Capri
Date: 18 Aug 92 16:33:21 GMT
Organization: HaL Computer Systems
NNTP-Posting-Host: sydney.hal.com

derek@nezsdc.icl.co.nz (Derek Tearne) writes:

> [ a bunch of loving praise of the elan ]

>Hope this clears up any controversy.  If I win Lotto I will buy the Elan.
>Until then I will stick to my 0-60 in 7.4 seconds 125 MPH 18 Year old 
>Jensen Healey. So much for progress.... 

then, summ50@cse.unl.edu (Eric Elliott) writes:

I like this comparison.  The only thing I have to add is the fact that the
Lotus Elan is also one of the best-handling front-wheel drive cars built.
	    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Ah well geez guys, I thought the whole point was you weren't supposed
to notice whether the damn thing was front or rear wheel drive. I've tried
one. Its a competent handler until pushed - then it understeers in a most
undignified manner. I was NOT impressed. (And no, I didn't bend it).

Yuck, no thanks.

Chris
--
"sometimes I think that the surest sign that intelligent life exists
elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us"  			    ---------------------------------------------------
crash@hal.com   	HAL Computer Systems Inc.
(408) 379-7000 x1163	1315 Dell Ave. Campbell CA 95008
From: rakoczynskij@gtephx.UUCP (Jurek Rakoczynski)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Re: HumVee 4 Sale??
Keywords: HumVee, AMC
Date: 19 Aug 92 16:49:26 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AG Communication Systems, Phoenix, Arizona

In article <1992Aug17.072525.27227@midway.uchicago.edu>, haase@zaphod.uchicago.edu (Mark Haase) writes:
> Dear Users,
> 
> It is my understanding that AMC sells military-grade HumVees to the 
> general populus.  Does anyone know who or where to contact AMC for this 
> information?  Thanks.

For more information on buying the HUMVEE, AM General has a (toll
free) number, 1-800-3-HUMVEE.

> Chris Haase
> Univeristy of Chicago
> (I need one in my neighborhood!)

If you need it in your neighbor hood, then you may not be happy with
the Hummer:

Civilian version will NOT keep:  :-(
  Weapon sytems including
    TOW antitank missles
    Stinger antitank missles
    Laser guided Hellfire missles
    machine guns, 30-mm cannons, and grenade lauchers

plus you might not be able to order the following:
  Kevlar ballistic liners; for stopping bullets
  NBC filters (nuclear, biologic, and chemical) for clean breathing
    air
      (I think city smog will overtax the system.  AMC might not want
       to warrenty it.)

But it can:
Climb 60% slopes and handle 40% side slopes
This should be a plus for climbing over abandoned cars.

:-) :-) :-) :-) for the humor impaired!
-- 
Jurek Rakoczynski, AG Communication Systems, POB 52179, Phoenix, AZ. 85072
UUCP: ...!{ncar!noao!enuucp | att}!gtephx!rakoczynskij  Voice: +1 602 581 4867
Inet: gtephx!rakoczynskij@enuucp.eas.asu.edu              Fax: +1 602 582 7111
Inet: /DD.UN=J.RAKOCZYNSKI/O=GTE/PRMD=GTEMAIL/ADMD=TELEMAIL/C=US/@sprint.com
From: ganapath@tahoe.qualcomm.com (Chinnappa Ganapathy)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Subject: Re: CRX vs Del Sol
Date: 19 Aug 92 17:42:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: qualcomm.1992Aug19.174221.13561
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA

In article <36899@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> za72@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (mo'money) writes:
>I was wondering what are people's opinions in
>regard to the new Del Sol as compare to the CRX.
>
>IMHO, the new Del Sol looks as stupid as the new Prelude.

I saw a blue del Sol in a parking lot a few days back.  It looks good.
-- 
Chinnappa Ganapathy    | "Think about it.  Look at other parts of the world
ganapath@qualcomm.com  |  today with concentration camps and stuff like that.
QUALCO/\/\/\/\         |  Then look at this silly game.  Kind of puts things
                       |  in perspective." - Bob Gagliano, Chargers Quaterback
Newsgroups: rec.autos
From: twong@civil.ubc.ca (Thomas Wong)
Subject: Re: Talon/Eclipse/Laser mailing list...
Organization: Dept. of Civil Engineering, U.B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 04:54:41 GMT

In article <1992Aug20.124854.5584@pool.info.sunyit.edu> gtas1@pool.info.sunyit.edu (Terrance Stedman) writes:
>
>	Can someone help me post to the above mailing list?  I can receive
>posted articles but my messages bounce every time.  
>	I'm using talon-list@radius.com, but to no avail.  Ideas?

I think you are missing something, try the following address....

diginst!talon-list@radius.com

Thomas.

Newsgroups: rec.autos
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Re: Buying used 1988 Honda Accord LX
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 07:51:43 GMT

In article <1992Aug21.173251.8437@das.harvard.edu> karp@virtual9.harvard.edu (Brad Karp) writes:

>I came across an advertisement for a 1988 Honda Accord LX with 84,000
>miles on it. They were asking $7,000.

>3) The exhaust system was replaced (pipes and muffler) in June. Are
>there any other items on an Accord that are going to start giving
>major trouble at 84K miles?

As suggested by another follow up, I too would check the breaks
and the timing belt. For Accords prior to and including '85, you are
supposed to change the timing belt around 60K miles. They cheanged
the design in '86.

>4) In general, does anyone have anything to say about whether
>purchasing an '88 Accord with 84K miles on it with the intention of
>getting at least 5 more years from it is generally advisable?

I have a '88 Accord LX purchased new. Mine has only 33K miles
and is almost like new today. I get excellent gas mileage on it
but acceleration is very poor. Other that that, I really like
that car.
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     HR 1A-304, AT&T Bell Labs, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ, 07748 USA
Lines: 13
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 92 06:37:24 MDT
From: earlyd@ee.byu.edu (David Early)
Newsgroups: rec.autos
Distribution: world
Organization: Brigham Young University, Provo UT USA
Subject: Re: 240Z restoral (was: Datsun 240Z/260Z)


John,

My mail daemon doesn't seem to recognize dixie.com.  Could you send me
your internet address (numerical)  or otherwise tell met how to get on the mailing
list and join the club you mentioned??


I'd appreciate it.

Thanks

 Dave Early
Newsgroups: rec.autos,rec.autos.driving