HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mliu@garden.csc.calpoly.edu (Mei-Ling L. Liu)
Subject: Edberg vs Sampras(WAS: Completed Mens QF Results)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 17:52:59 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, Cal Poly SLO

In article <93027.110405SMS124@psuvm.psu.edu> Shane M. Swiderski <SMS124@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>I would tend to agree with M. Stich making it to the final, but I have to go wi
>th my man Stefan to triumph over Sampras in a close one.  The final should come
>down to who is serving better and again I will give the edge to Stefan because
>of his one-two punch.

For your amusement, the Australian bookmakers favor Sampras, giving him
something like a 1-2 odd (bet $1 and win $2 if he becomes the champ) and
Edberg a 1-3 odd.  This is BEFORE Stefan's injury.  Courier, however,
is the favorite.  But you can never count Stefan out, as we all know.

By the way, does anyone have the latest word on Edberg's back problems?
How did he do yesterday?(I know he won, but did he serve harder than
against Boetsch?  Did he have problem with overheads?  I read that 
during the Mansdorf match, he couldn't even bend down to pick up a ball!)
The New York Times yesterday spent more space reporting his back
treatments than his victory over Boetsch:-).

M. Liu
From: probal@pepper.rutgers.edu (Probal Kumar Bhattacharjya)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Results: Australian Open Day 6 Report (Jan 23)
Date: 26 Jan 93 01:06:38 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

The missing scores from Chris's report for Day 6
-----------------------------------------------
(obtained from clari.sport.tennis)

    Washington(13) d. Stark 6-4, 6-7 (5-7), 6-2, 6-4

    Fernandez(5) d. Sawamatsu 2-6, 6-3, 6-1


	--P.
From: weber@ohm.york.ac.uk (Weber Martins)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: satellite in Europe (not SkySports)?????
Date: 24 Jan 93 13:16:38 GMT
Organization: Electronics Department, University of York, UK

Is there other channels covering Australian Open to Europe? I know
of SkySports... Anyone else????

Thanks in advance

		Weber
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: haberm@imag.fr (Peter Habermehl)
Subject: Re: Prediction
Organization: IMAG Institute, University of Grenoble, France
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 08:45:18 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.131114.1@acad.drake.edu> drm002@acad.drake.edu (Dave R. Muhich) writes:
>
>
>	My prediction for the AO is that Seles will easily win the women's
>title and, being from Minnesota, I like David Wheaton as my sentimental men's
>champion. Probably not likely, but who knows?
>						Dave


-- 
Peter Habermehl
IMAG Grenoble, France
e-mail: haberm@imag.fr
From: GE.TEG@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tito E. Gervacio)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Acapuncture Maybe Good To Your Tennis Health
Date: 21 Jan 1993 22:09:09 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu


>From: clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles Lin)
>Subject: Re: Tendonitis
>
>
>I won't vouch for it, but if you want unconventional  treatments,
>there's  always acapuncture.
>
>--
>Charles Lin
>clin@eng.umd.edu

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Acapuncture is REALLY worth a try.  It helped me on a similar type
of situation before.  So why not venture on something different?

-TEG
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: More News Tidbits
From: michael@major.ucnv.edu.au (Mike Smyth)
Date: 26 Jan 1993 09:34 EST
Distribution: world
Organization: University College of Northern Victoria
NNTP-Posting-Host: andre.ucnv.edu.au
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

In article <1993Jan20.134613.11544@cc.gatech.edu>, csmith@cc.gatech.edu (Christopher Smith) writes...
> 
>Compiled from various newspaper and radio sources:
> 
>  + On Wednesday, Michael Stich registered the fastest serve ever recorded
>    at the Australian Open, 203 km/h (I'm a bit rusty on metric conversion,
>    but that works out to about 127 mph).

Michael Stich has upped the anti again. On match point in his match against Kent
Carlson he lanched a 211 km/h ace. Once again the fastest serve recorded. He
will now play Guy Forget in the Quarter Finals. They recently played in the
Hopman Cup. Michael had Guy mesmerised by his serve. At one stage he serve 6
aces in a row. The final count was something like 32 aces to 7.

Happy hitting
mike.
From: coyle@waikato.ac.nz
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: rec.sport.tennis
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:57:30 +1300
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

In article <9302612.20544@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>, sliew@mullian.ee.mu.oz.au (Selbyn Liew) writes:
> In article <1993Jan25.174757.17453@wuecl.wustl.edu> am5@cec2.wustl.edu (Avik  Mukherjee) writes:
>>can someone tell me about Brett Steven's game? I'm curious to know, since I've
>>never seen him. I doubt too many others have seen him either. 
>>
>>-vic
> 
> I watched part of his match with Fromberg.  The impression is that he is
> quite into serve and volley but also quite consistent from the baseline.
> His serve is not much of a weapon though.  I don't know if he'll be able
> to return Sampras' serve well enough also.  I'm not sure how much he's
> really been tested in this tournament in terms of meeting levels of play
> of the top players - since I think he's ranked 200++ and this is his

  First round he beat an U.S. qualifier in 4.
  Second round he beat Thomas Muster (Austria, #18) in 3.
  Third round he beat Andrei Olhovsky (Russia?, lower ranking than Steven) in 4.
  Fourth round he beat Richie Fromberg (Australia, #76) in 5.
  Fifth round to play Pete Sampras (U.S.A, #3).

  Actually his ranking was #71 when he entered this tournament.


> first grand slam.  However, he seems quite fit (compared to Fromberg, who
> was clearly lethargic in the later part of the fifth set).
> 
> sliew
> ==========================================================================
> Dept. of EE Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
> EMAIL: sliew@mullian.ee.mu.oz.au    PH: +61-3-3447976   FAX: +61-3-3446678
> ==========================================================================
From: probal@brushfire.rutgers.edu (Probal Kumar Bhattacharjya)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Results: Australian Open Day 1 Report
Date: 22 Jan 93 19:32:02 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

And then Oremans lost to Conchita Martinez in thrid round ...
	--P.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: benno@ldgo.columbia.edu (benno blumenthal)
Subject: Program to make a tournament draw
Keywords: tennis racquetball tournament software
Organization: Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 19:06:19 GMT

I am running a RacquetBall tournament in March.  I am looking for a
program to help set up a draw.  Does anyone have some suggestions?

Steve Delgado     Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia University
                  Palisades NY 10964     (914) 365-8337

internet:  benno@lamont.ldgo.columbia.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: 09143@ravel.udel.edu (Nemo)
Subject: Re: Monica's serve at the AO..
Originator: 09143@ravel.udel.edu
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:52:37 GMT

In article <C1I8q9.9v5@news.cso.uiuc.edu> brg6080@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Red Cloud) writes:
>09143@ravel.udel.edu (Nemo) writes:

>>About the 'fast' serve she has developed recently, it was nowhere  in
>>evidence in the first AO match telecast here (USA). Her first serve seemed
>>to average in the 120's (from observation of the readout whenever it came
>>up in a frame). In contrast, Steffi's first serves were at least in
>>the 140's and most often in the 150's. To paraphrase somebody from an
>>unrelated thread on r.s.t. 'One data point does not a trend make...'
>>Comments?
>
>>Cheers!
>>Vikram
>
>Here's a comment:
>
>The numbers you give for Graf are incredible.  Are they mph or kph?
>The record men's serve is 129 mph.  (See enclosed article.)

kmph. Need I say obviously.
The fastest womens' serve was 169kmph (105mph) (Seles)
The fastest mens' serve was apparently 209kmph (129.87mph!) (Stich)

Cheers!
Vikram
From: cs30@prism.gatech.EDU (Christopher Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Request for the ESPN schedule for the AO
Date: 27 Jan 93 18:21:27 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


> Would some-one please post the ESPN schedule for the AO- specially
> the timings for the semis and finals. Thanks alot.

Times are EST

   Date         Time
   ----         ----
   Jan 28       2:00 pm -  4:00 pm  (tape)    Women's Semifinals
   Jan 29      12:00 am -  2:00 am  (tape)    Men's Semifinal  
                2:00 pm -  4:00 pm  (tape)         "
                9:00 pm - 11:00 pm            Women's Final
   Jan 30      10:00 pm -  1:00 am            Men's Final

 
..Chris

-- 
Christopher Smith                        csmith@cc.gatech.edu
College of Computing, Georgia Tech       404/853-0937
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Re: Seles vs Graf
Organization: AT&T
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 13:15:28 GMT

In article <1jsifeINNjos@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> patano@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Scott Patano) writes:
>     I suppose I had better respond to the die-hard Seles (or is
>     it anti-Graf) fan down there in Southern California.  Let me
>     take the comments he made one by one:
>
>     1)  He claims Seles' victory over Navratilova as proof of her
>         ability to win Wimbledon.  Although I was very surprised
>         at Seles' (narrow) victory, we must remember that Martina
>         hasn't exactly been in her finest form this year, and that
>         she did lose to a 15 year-old Capriati (who has no serve
>         and volley game to speak of) at the previous Wimbledon.

   [ other points deleted ]

Sorry to be blunt, but Mr. Patano, why do you argue your points with
reasoning and common sense? That has NOT been the case in general
under this thread. Further responses will merely provide additional
opportunities for more bandwidth to be wasted.

Should we create a sub-group:  re.sport.tennis.seles>graf?
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     AT&T, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ,  07748  USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: dyko@mundil.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Darren Yiu Ming KO)
Subject: day9 and some day10 results
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:25:29 GMT


   Day 9

   Women's quarter final:
   A Sanchez-Vicario (Spn) d MJ Fernandez (US) 7-5 6-4
   S Graf (Ger) d J Capriati (US) 7-5 6-2
   M Seles (Yug) d J Halard (Fr) 6-2 6-7(5-7) 6-0
   G Sabatini (Arg) d M Pierce (Fr) 4-6 7-6(14-12) 6-0

   Day 10

   Men's quarter final:
   M Stich (Ger) d G Forget (Fr) 6-4 6-4 6-4
   P Sampras (US) d B Steven (NZ) 6-3 6-2 6-3

Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: daosjob@maths.tcd.ie (Damian Jackson)
Subject: Predictions
Keywords: Predictions
Organization: Dept. of Maths, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 08:59:39 GMT

It seems to me,from all the different predictions going around this group that 
no-one has a clue who is going to win at the open.This is hardly surprising as 
all the players are in good form and each player can beat any of the others.
I don't think that there is any such thing as an upset at this stage of the 
tournament because no result would be surprising(except a very easy victory).

So,I'm sorry but I'm not going to make a prediction excapt to say that Seles
will win the ladies(but that's easy to predict).
			
			Damian.
From: cs30@prism.gatech.EDU (Christopher Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Women's SF #1 Result (SPOILERS)
Date: 28 Jan 93 03:17:33 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


Spoilers follow:


    Seles(1) d. Sabatini(3)     6-1 6-2


-- 
Christopher Smith                        csmith@cc.gatech.edu
College of Computing, Georgia Tech       404/853-0937
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: doucas@cerberus.bhpese.oz.au (Chris Doucas)
Subject: Re: Article in Gentlemen's Quarterly
Organization: BHP Information Technology
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 01:39:22 GMT
Followup-To: rec.sport.tennis,soc.culture.australian

In article <farrell.727659388@coral>, farrell@coral.cs.jcu.edu.au (John
Farrell) wrote:
> 
> In <1993Jan21.152440.10515@chpc.utexas.edu> eddie@chpc.utexas.edu (G'day) writes:
> > The article mentions some words we can use to pass ourselves off as dinkum
> >Aussies (genuine Australians). Please direct flames (if any) to /dev/null :>).
> > Yih, mate. (yes buddy). Ahrs-TRY-ya. (Australia). Fair dinkum. (On the level).
> >Sickie. (Day off). wowers. (kill joys). drongo. (worthless moron).
>                     ^^^^^^ wowsers
> >stickybeak. (nosy person). One of the best IMO is Na-ow warries! (No worries).
> 
>   A drongo is actually a bird which (I think) makes a particularly stupid
> noise. So a reasonably accurate translation is "dodo".
> 
> >Well... I hope you got a chuckle or two from this.
> 
>   About as much as you get from translations of "booger", "sit on it",
> "fuckin' A" and "press the flesh". But you mugs would never pass as Aussies
> because you've got those bloody awful septic accents...
> 
> 
> Friendless, fuckin' A.

To: Johnny

- Good on ya, Mate....!!

>              ______________________________________________________________
Regards,      | BHP Information Technology | eMAIL:
-------       | PO Box 216                 |  doucas@cerberus.bhpese.oz.au 
              | Hamilton, NSW              | FAX:                PHONE:  
the Duke..    | Australia 2303             |  +(63) 49 40 2165 / ..40 2123 

   
                 >> A Fool With A Tool Is Still A Fool ! <<
From: U58476@uicvm.uic.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: rankings information
Date: 26 Jan 93 14:15:20 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago

In article <1k2592INNm8c@alnitak.usc.edu>, kasibhot@alnitak.usc.edu
(Srinivasamurthy Kasibhotla) says:

>I am not sure I understand this entirely. Are you saying that under each
>category, points differ, depending on the amount of prize money? I thought all
>grand slam winners got equal number of points. But you have 5 rows(why 5?)
> under grand slams with difeerent points for each round. I guess I am just
>lost
>here. Also can some one please give me example names of tournments under other
>categories?
That is another difference between the men's & women's systems: the points
awarded per round in each tournament depends on the prize money offered.  So,
in the Grand Slam events, the winner of the Australian Open (men) will receive
the fewest points relative to the other 3 events; the US Open winner earns the
most points.  In the other tour events, winners of the Championship Series
events will get far more points than those who win say the Atlanta, Bordeaux,
etc. tournaments.  "Championship Series" events have a total prize money of
over $1 million & include the events in Indianapolis, New Haven, Indian Wells,
Paris, & several others.  Someone else can probably fill in with more details;
the men's tour seems complicated. :-) :-)

>*
>        My question is are there only two tiers of tournments in women's
>tennis
>        grand slams and regular (with no further subdivisions among
>"regular")?
>        What about the Lipton's International at Key Biscayne for example, it
>        is a 2 week event with 128 players. Does the winner at Lipton get the
>        same points as winner at Italian open as at Taipei Open, etc.
What is considered "regular", as far as I know, is all non-Grand Slam events
(except for the VS Championships): the upper tier $750,000 (formerly $500,000
which includes the Italian & German Opens, Hilton Head, etc.), the $375,000
(eg VS Chicago), & the events that were $225,000 (Mazda, Barcelona, etc).  I
suppose that the smaller tournaments such as Taipei follow the same point
system, but I have no way of knowing.  Apparently, the Lipton event is another
one that does not follow either system since Sabatini earned 238 points as a
finalist, which is too little for the "Slam system," & too much for the
"regular system."  Thanks for bringing that up.  The women's points system is
"set" & does not depend on the prize money, at least for those $225,000 & over.
Again, I really don't know about those smaller tournaments.

Natasha
From: cs30@prism.gatech.EDU (Christopher Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Day 11 Doubles Report
Date: 28 Jan 93 14:07:43 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


Here is a combination of late Day 10 and early Day 11 doubles results.

  + Men (SF)
    ---
    Visser/Warder(10) d. De Jager/Ondruska       6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4

  + Women (QF)
    -----
    G. Fernandez/Zvereva(1) d. McNeil/Stubbs(5)  6-3 6-1
    Shriver/Smylie(10) d. Neiland/Novotna(2)     6-3 6-3
    Heatherington/Rinaldi(6) d. 
            Martinez/Sanchez Vicario(3)          4-6 6-1 6-0
    Fendick/Strnadova(8) d. Fernandez/Garr'n(4)  6-2 6-2

  + Mixed
    -----
    Garrison/Leach(3) d. Miyagi/Kinnear          4-6 7-6 9-7  (QF)
    Zvereva/Jones(2) d. Smylie/Fitzgerald        6-1 3-6 6-3  (QF)

    Shriver/Stolle d. Rehe/Visser(6)             6-3 6-4      (2nd rnd)
    Martinez/J. Sanchez d. G. Fernandez/Witsken  6-2 6-7 6-3  (2nd rnd)


..Chris

-- 
Christopher Smith                        csmith@cc.gatech.edu
College of Computing, Georgia Tech       404/853-0937
From: cd377@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Israel Yanez)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Bold predictions for the Australian open
Date: 21 Jan 1993 17:06:07 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: cd377@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Israel Yanez)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, arijeet@lorelei.ece.drexel.edu (Arijit Das) says:

>
>Any predictions for the Australian Open winner, 
>being a Stich fan I think he is going all the way.
>---
>arijit
>

Well, on the women's side it is exciting to see Sabatini's draw opening up
since McNeil and Novotna both were eliminated.  Her first (if she doesn't
disappoint us) huge match would be against Seles in the semis!!  Actually, 
as her #1 fan, I had a dream that she beat Seles in the semis, 7-5, 6-4 and
she was to meet Graf in the final after Steffi crushed Arantxa 6-2,6-0 in 
their semi.  When they were to take the court for the final, I woke up!
OK, so it's infantile, but, hey, let's hear it for Gaby!!!!!
-- 
=================================================================
"Your kiss just hindered my day...."     --k.d. lang
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
iyanez@csus.edu           California State University, Sacramento
From: hempel_j@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Brett Steven beats Muster
Date: 22 Jan 1993 04:31:05 GMT
Organization: Wellington City Council (Public Access), Wgtn, Nz
Reply-To: hempel_j@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

Brett Steven from lil old New Zealand beat a player 53 places above him!
CONGRATULATIONS!

John.
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 14:42:34 CST
From: <U58476@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Results: Australian Open Day 4 Report (Jan 21)

In article <1993Jan21.133150.6480@cc.gatech.edu>, csmith@cc.gatech.edu
(Christopher Smith) says:
>Press `n' to skip results:
>
>Today's Results:
>
>  + Men (2nd round)
>    ---
>    Sampras(3) d. Larsson            6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4
>    Volkov(16) d. Pioline            2-6 6-7 6-2 7-5 8-6  (saved 6 MP's)
>
>    Also advancing: Ferreira(10), Costa(12), and Washington(13).
>
>    Boetsch d. Svensson              (10-8 in the fifth)
>    Steven d. Muster                 6-2 7-6 6-4          (not sure here)

More results: Edberg (2) d. Prinosil      6-2,6-0,6-1
              Costa (12) d. Kulti         6-3,6-7(4-7),6-4,6-3
              Washington (13) d. Vacek    6-2,7-5,6-1
              Black d. Goellner           6-1,6-4,6-4
              Olhovskiy d. Denman         6-4,6-2,6-4
              Antonitsch d. Pridham       6-3,6-2,6-7(6-8),6-2
              Stark d. Carbonell          6-4,6-4,6-3
              Bergstrom d. Holm           7-5,2-6,6-4,1-6,6-4
              Fromberg d. Kiel            6-1,3-6,6-3,7-6(8-6)
              Mansdorf d. Champion        7-6(7-3),6-1,7-5

>  + Women (2nd round)
>    -----
>    Graf(1) d. Santrock              6-1 6-1
>    Sanchez Vic.(4) d. Gildemeister  6-0 6-1
>    Fernandez(5) d. Wang             7-6(7-1) 6-4
>    Capriati(7) d. Labat             6-7(8-10) 7-5 6-2
>    Huber(11) d. Martinek
>    K. Maleeva(14) d. ??             6-1 6-4

     Maleeva-Fragniere(9) d. Wasserman  6-4,6-1
     M. Maleeva (15) d. Langrova        6-1,6-0
     Gorrochatehui d. Temesvari         6-1,7-5
     Babel d. Price                     7-5,1-6,63
     Sawamatsu d. Thoren                6-1,7-5
     Rittner d. Habsudova               6-2,7-6(7-5)
     Zvereva d. Hack                    7-5,6-7(3-7),6-3
     Helgeson d. Meier                  6-3,6-3
     Porwik d. Graham                   6-3,7-5
     Zrubakova d. Rehe                  5-7,6-3,8-6

  *K. Maleeva def. Monami

>..Chris
>
Natasha
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: AO Men's Singles Draw, Updated to the Final 8 (SPOILERS)
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 15:11:01 GMT


           1993 Australian Open draw, men's singles, updated to final 8

             Courier (1) --------+  Courier
                                 |--------+
           Bruguera (15) --------+        |
                                          |--------+
                 Garner  --------+        |        |
                                 |--------+        |
               Korda (7) --------+    Korda        |
                                                   |--------+
                Carlsen  --------+    Stich        |        |
                                 |--------+        |        |
              Stich (14) --------+        |        |        |
                                          |--------+        |
             Forget (11) --------+        |                 |
                                 |--------+                 |
                  Jones  --------+   Forget                 |
                                                            +--------> Champion
                 Steven  --------+        ?                 |
                                 |--------+                 |
               Fromberg  --------+        |                 |
                                          |--------+        |
         Washington (13) --------+        |        |        |
                                 |--------+        |        |
             Sampras (3) --------+  Sampras        |        |
                                                   |--------+
              Bergstrom  --------+Bergstrom        |
                                 |--------+        |
           Ferreira (10) --------+        |        |
                                          |--------+
                Boetcsh  --------+        |
                                 |--------+
              Edberg (2) --------+   Edberg

Fromberg and Steven were playing the fifth set when I got my last update.
That match should be over by now. Unfortunately, I don't have the results.

Edberg and Sampras won their respective round of 16 matches in straight sets.
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     AT&T, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ,  07748  USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis