HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: weitzeka@ntmtv.UUCP (Keith Weitzel)
Subject: Re: Miami Dolphins
Reply-To: weitzeka@ntmtv.UUCP 
Organization: Northern Telecom Inc, Mountain View, CA
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:25:06 GMT

In article <Bvs8u8.JxI@acsu.buffalo.edu> v130pwbq@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
>Here is the Miami Dolphin schedule. Along side each game a have placed a number.
>1 - should have no problem winning, 2 - should win/could be close,
>D 14 LA Raiders       (1) 

   The Raiders on Monday night and Miami is going to win with no
problems? I don't think so.  The Raiders have the Dolphins number.
I cannot remember when the last time that the Dolphins beat the
Raiders in regular season.  The Raiders are always tough on
Monday night.  Hopefully, the Dolphins will do as you and look
past the Raiders, then the Raiders will go to Maimi and crush
the unexpecting Dolphans.

A die hard Raider fan
I bleed silver and black
From: rinehart@aramis.rutgers.edu (Mark J. Rinehart)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: GIANTS news
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:04:56 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <92229@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:

> This is for Adrienne, Kevin and other GIANTS fans out there (if there are any
> left on this planet) and anyone else seeking football news not relating to
> the Eagboys and the Cowgles:
> 1) After the hit that Simms took against the Raiders, his arm was sore. 
> MIR and x-ray revealed a bruised elbow so he's out for Sunday and Hoss is
> in as quarterback.


Further update from ESPN this morning - Simms is going to have surgery
on that elbow and will probably be out 6 weeks.




Mark
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: wung@puttgen.ee.gatech.edu (Peter Wung)
Subject: What does it all mean? (was Re: Hats off to the Chiefs...)
Reply-To: wung@puttgen.ee.gatech.edu
Organization: Sun Microsystems
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 21:56:54 GMT

OK 

The Broncos gets smacked by the Eagles, the Eagles loses to the Chiefs, the Chiefs 
loses to the Broncos by a smidge thanks to The Elway 2 minute Drill Version # 21.
I am losing my mind!

********************************************************************
*Peter Wung			Email:wung@ee.gatech.edu	   * 
*Electric Power Laboratory	Snail mail: 33787 Ga. Tech Station * 
*School of Electrical Engineering	    Atlanta, GA 30332      *
*Georgia Institute of Technology			    	   *
*Atlanta, Georgia						   *
*   	"Pass, Set, CRUSH!"...					   * 
*  	Well, 2 out of 3 ain't bad for a short, fat guy. 	   *
*								   *
********************************************************************
From: bittle@niktow.canisius.edu (Jason Bittle)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Miami is all hype....
Date: 7 Oct 92 14:01:13 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo NY. 14208

In article <1992Oct06.153659.30555@uvmark.uucp>, davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:

> We sucked????  Knock Knock... Hello...  The Dolphins are 4-0.  Not the
> 4 in the win column and the 0 in the loss column.  Now, please define

well, not sucked.  How about "very inconvincing" before the Bills game.  Admit
it, you guys had trouble with a 1-3 (now 1-4) team called the Seahawks.  And
if I remember correctly, they almost scored in the final 2 minutes, and got
very close.

The point being is that any team can beat any other team on any given Sunday.
Miami's difficulties with easier teams (read: New England and Seattle, to name
a few) will give them problems down the stretch.  Plus their 16 straight games
while the rest of the AFC East  (save NE) will also hurt them, if any key
players get injured.

BTW - The Dolphins have what is called the "Buffalo Sabres disease".  They
play up to the level of their opponents.  (The Sabres are rediculous in the
aspect.)

Look for the Bills to crush another weak team, the Raiders.  No one, nowadays,
fears the Black and Silver.  The secondary should have an excellent day
reading Todd Marinovich and my only worry is stopping Ronnie Lott from killing
someone... :-)

GO BILLS!




-- 
ciao,                             
Jason Bittle (bittle@canisius.edu) 
(a.k.a. Pillsbury Dough Boy )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ric@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (ricardo.g.irvin)
Subject: Re: Should Marv Levy Be Fired?
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 23:21:43 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.180739.7334@math.ucla.edu> rfedkiw@redwood.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:
>In Article 31422, ricardo.g.irvin writes ...
>
>>I know this is not your main point, but, In no way was the GIANTS of 89
>>"inferior" to the Bills. And they prove that 2 out of the 3 times they met
>                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>that year. Just because they did not score 40 points per game like the
> ^^^^^^^^^ 
>>Bills did does'nt make "inferior".
>>I basically remember  the GIANTS driving the Bills
>             ^^^^^^^^
>>Def. Linemen down field and spiking them in the End Zone 8{D.
>
>Does anyone know what the hell this guy is talking about ???????
>What is this 2 of 3 dream ???? I sure don't trust this guys memory !!!
>
>Saturday, Dec 15     Buf @ NYG 17 13  BILLS WIN
>Sunday, Jan 27       NYG v Buf 20 19  BILLS CHOKE

I remember them playing in the preseason as well.
I was waiting for this 8{D.

>The Bills won in NY, on the road, and Frank Reich played half the game.
>Although Simms and Horsesitter also split the game.
>
>Then the Bills lost at a neutral site, missing the game winning field
>goal by a few feet...
if the GIANTS had made their 3rd down conversion on their last posess....,
ahh never mind.

>
>
>
>--
>Ron Fedkiw (rfedkiw@joshua.math.ucla.edu)
>
>A plan is made by someone who is sitting and thinking ...
>while others are doing.
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dallas was beaten by bad luck, not the eagles!
Date: 11 Oct 92 23:08:13 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Pacific * Bell

In article <1992Oct11.060707.24652@wheaton.wheaton.edu> klbartle@david.wheaton.edu (Kevin Bartlett) writes:
>>>                                                   "Bad luck" is losing
>>>your All-World defensive lineman for an eternity so he can be part of the
>>>All-Heaven team.  That's "bad luck".
>>
>>No, that's called "wreckless driving".
>>
>If that's a pun, it's a horrible one.  If it's not, it should be "reckless
>driving" not "wreck-less driving."
>
>>Ray         GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>					. . . the Mantis
>
>Randall Cunningham for president.
>Go EAGLES!
>
>
Yeah, right! Randall can be Perot's running mate. We all
know how far Perot will go? :-)  Like I said before,
Cunningham is a pretender and he is only good in choking.
Good QB's come through. :-)


-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  Let us be thankful for the fools; but for them the rest
  of us could not succeed.  -   Mark Twain
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Packers starting QB - Majik or Favre
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date: 12 OCT 92 15:26:41    

We've discussed a little who will be the starting QB for the Pack 
against Cleveland.  I mostly approached it in terms of saying what I 
thought Holmgren would do.  But I think if I was the coach I'd start 
Majik against Cleveland.  My reasoning is that I'd want to find out if 
the team is 2-1 since Majik got hurt is because Favre is the better QB 
or because the team is playing better now.

The old saw 'A player doesn't lose his starting job because of an 
injury' is not an issue here.  Favre is the QB of the future.  Majkowski 
was not getting the job done.  I certainly don't think that Majik was 
solely responsible for the 0-2 start but with the way Favre is playing I 
wouldn't have a problem proclaiming him the starter.

Also, I don't believe this business of bringing a young QB along 
slowly so you don't ruin his confidence.  I can see letting a young QB 
sit if you're not sure he's good enough.  This apparently does not 
apply to Favre.

I said earlier when I was trying to predict what Holmgren would do 
that I thought Favre would stay the starter.  Every other prediction 
that I've seen has been been that Majkowski would be given the 
starting job back.  So now I'm starting to waver.  Its been so long 
since the Packers have had 2 decent QBs that I have no experience with 
this problem.

I guess I'll stick with my prediction only because Holmgren always 
does the semi-unexpected.  It's not like he does crazy things but he 
frequently does *not* do what you expect him to.

JGH
From: wayman@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Jeffrey Wayman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Elway's comebacks (was Re: The most underrated quarterback)
Date: 15 Oct 92 15:33:34 GMT
Organization: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO  80523


I read where 16 of Elway's 21 comebacks have been at Mile High Stadium.
I think a major factor in these is the altitude.  That was certainly
true in the Chiefs-Broncos game.

Jeff         wayman@lamar.colostate.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: UPSET PICK!!!!!!!
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 00:45:15 GMT

In article <92822@netnews.upenn.edu> mckernan@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Robert L Mckernan) writes:
>
>	THE UPSET PICK OF THE COMING WEEK:
>
>
>	(0-5)NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS... 21
>        (5-0)MIAMI DOLPHINS......... 16
>
>	PATRIOTS ALWAYS GIVE MARINO FITS AND THEY ARE DUE FOR A WIN. THEY
>LET YOUNG & co. ESCAPE WITH A WIN BUT THEY WON'T LET UP THIS WEEK. COACH
>MAC WILL HAVE HIS TROOPS FIRED UP.
>
>			ROB

Homey don't think so! :-) Most likely a Marino rout!
The only upset that I can forsee is:

49ers     17
Atlanta   21

Why? Well, the Falcons seem to play the Niners with
determination.  I know, the Falcons were spoilers 
last year and Glanville and CO. always play their best
against the Niners.

Of course I am a Niners fan, but the Falcons make me 
nervous. Just hope I am way off base on this one. :-)
BTW: I am hoping the score WILL BE 49ers 38  Falcons  10 X X
(crossing my fingers)

BTW: can you believe Dallas is favored over Kansas City?
Homey don't think so!

Dallas       27
Kansas City  31
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
"I do not think that winning is the most important thing. 
I think winning is the only thing."    - Bill Veeck
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jeffh@crchh317.BNR.CA (Jeff Hammond)
Subject: Re: Useless Cowboys Fans Mindless Ramblings
Reply-To: jeffh@crchh317.BNR.CA (Jeff Hammond)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 21:27:56 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.115721.665@totaltec.com>, mark@totaltec.com writes:
|>>>       misc drivel from
|>>>       several posts   
|>>>       deleted.      
|>>>
|>>>	  
|>
|>Mark Remeta
|>GO EAGLES!!!
                               
	Who or what woke up Mr Remeta ?

---------------------------------------------------------------^--------------
jeffh@bnr.ca | My opinions do not represent those|            /|\
mss	     | of my employer or any other person|           \ | /            
-------------|-------------------- I know.       |            \|/
The only true power of the universe| SO THERE!   |<------------+------------>
is that of the individual. The   |---------------|            /|\
only true individual is one      |    GO!!!      |           / | \
who knows his place in the cosmos|   COWBOYS     |         |/_ | _\|
and seeks to extend it. jjh      |    BILLS      |             |
---------------------------------------------------------------v--------------
From: mcgowan@physics.llnl.gov (Jay D McGowan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Status of Eric Greeen and Kevin Mack
Keywords: Green and Mack
Date: 9 Oct 92 17:35:55 GMT
Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

The subject says it all.  I would like to know the status of Eric Green and
Kevin Mack.  I believe they have both been activated but I'd like to know
if they're going to play and at what level.

Thanks a lot for any info at all,


Jay D. McGowan L-298		jdm@llnl.gov
"How you handle pressure determines how you handle life"
LLNL
7000 East Ave.
Livermore, CA 94550
(510) 423-9860
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jjn@cbjjn.cb.att.com (Jeff Nappi)
Subject: Re: HAIL THE BROWNS
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 17:58:19 GMT

In article <1992Oct14.145757.2752@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, tgt@cbtgt.cb.att.COM (Tim Thompson) writes:
|> In article <1992Oct14.132306.27922@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, jjn@cbjjn.cb.att.com (Jeff Nappi) writes:
|> |> Do you not know the unwritten rule of woofing, "anyone who woofs on a 
|> |> mediocre team will surely cause that team to lose.." Ok Browns fans, 
|> |> if we lose to Green Bay this week we know who to blame.-)
|> |> -- 
|> |> Jeff Nappi
|> 
|> Jeff,
|>   Don't you mean to say "When we lose to Green Bay this week. . ."?
|> 
|>   OH,NO! Now I've done it. I've woofed on the Packers, and evened things
|>   out. Is it too late to take it back?
|> 
|>   The Browns beat the Packers by 45 points!!! The Browns are awesome!!! 
|>   They're going to the Super Bowl this year!!!!
|> 
|>   (Whew! There, that ought to do it. Woof gods are so easy to fool! They
|>    don't read parenthetical comments, by the way.)
|> 
Nice try Tim but us Browns fans all know the old "reverse woofing ploy" when
we here it!

GO BROWNS!!!
-- 
Jeff Nappi
Columbus Bell Labs
jjn@cbjjn.att.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Re: Wild cards
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 22:22:59 GMT

rege@bongo.Berkeley.EDU (Ashutosh G. Rege) writes:
> the argument is not that the Falcons 
> didn't deserve to be in the playoffs, it was that the 8-8 Jets and the
> 9-7 Raiders (or was it the Chiefs ?) didn't. The Eagles and Niners 
> should have replaced both these teams, it certainly would have made
> for a better caliber of game. 

The Raiders beat the Niners fair and square, 12-6.  To me, this says
that they were more deserving than the Niners.  Case closed.


--Gidi
From: rinehart@aramis.rutgers.edu (Mark J. Rinehart)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Telecast of Lions-Vikings game
Date: 16 Oct 92 15:11:15 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <auwen.719182824@convex.convex.com> auwen@convex.com (John David Auwen) writes:

> In <1992Oct15.184130.22737@unislc.uucp> jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske) writes:
> >   Are all (non-blacked-out) ESPN and TNT games also on local channels?
> >   I didn't notice since I was living in an NFL desert for the past 4 years.
> I think so.  When the Cowboys were on ESPN last year, it was also shown on
> a local station.
> Dave

I think the rule is if the game is scheduled to be on a cable station
- ESPN and TNT - it must also be broadcast on free tv in the local
viewing area of both teams. So when the Jets were recently on TNT,
the game was also broadcast on WPIX, Ch. 11 in NYC. 



Mark
From: un032221@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Browns News - 1st qtr review - Steeler preview
Date: 16 Oct 92 12:33:57 GMT
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <1bd2gtINN4s@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, am402@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Alex Canada) writes:
> 
> In a previous article, rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith) says:
> 
>>Actually prognosticte means 'to use present indications as a guide', or
>>'foreshadow' or 'portend'.
>>
>>Seeing as how Pittsburgh had a better offense and defense going into the
>>game, I thinks Daves prognostication was fine... it was just incorrect! :)
> 
> Just curious here.. who did Pittsburgh beat to get to 3-1? before the Browns
> game? Weren't 2 of them pretty weak teams?
> 
> Alex
> 

	Yes, they beat Houston on the strength of Warren Moon throwing 5 pix,
The Jets, in another unimpressive win, and the Chargers, again unimpressive.
It is not as much these games that impress me, because their
"unimopressiveness" has derived from an offense with a penchant for turnovers,
and a young QB.  Their defnse's main problem is lack of pass rush.  Barry
Foster, and co. look good IMO, and so I think they may develop later in the
season.  Sure they aren't as good as their record early, but I see the
potential for a pretty darn good team seething beneath the surface.  A sign
that I did not see at all last year.
	-Skins fan with just one thing to say: "WAY TO GO MONK!!!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: robert@landru.mtc.ti.com (Robert Treese)
Subject: Cowboy report
Organization: Manufacturing Technology Center, Texas Instruments, Dallas
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 13:37:19 GMT


Mark Tuinei (sp) hurt his back lifting weights and will probably not
play Sunday.  Veingrad will take his place.   Look out Troy!!!!

Michael Irvin is asking to be the primary receiver more.  He says he
will carry this team.


Robert
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: wisp@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Wisp)
Subject: Re: Washington Redskins News - Oct. 14, 1992
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 08:34:22 GMT

In article <1992Oct15.030624.14761@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> metz@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Daniel M Metz) writes:
>>
>>Other News:
>>----------
>>Cornerback Sidney Johnson suffered a fractured hand.  He may play against
>>the Eagles.  Gibbs was particular happy with Johnson who was back on
>>the field a week after suffering a compound dislocation of the left
>>ring finger.
>
>Now wait a minute, let's get our Johnsons straight here.  It was AJ Johnson
>who was the cornerback who suffered the dislocated finger last week, not
>Sidney Johnson.  Now about breaking the hand,I'm not sure... Can someone
>say which Johnson fractured the hand?
>
>Also, what exactly is a "compound dislocation"?  A compound fracture is when
>the bone breaks and then also breaks through the skin, but I don't see how
>anything similar could happen with a dislocation...Any orthopedists out
>there?
>

I'm not an orthopedist exactly, but an ER room doc...

A compound dislocation is what happens when a joint is dislocated so violently
that the skin over it is torn. Never seen it happen to a finger, but a pair of
beautiful compund fracture/dislocations of the ankles spring to mind (hubby
wasn't expected home that night, methinks!).

BTW, a compound fracture just means the skin over it is broken. It can happen
either from within, as you describe, or from without: i.e. the laceration
is caused by the object causing the fracture...

Cheers,

The Wisp. [resident medical pedant...]
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: spork@camelot.bradley.edu (Richard Izzo)
Subject: Re: Hats off to the Chiefs...
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: na
Date: 12 Oct 92 18:20:47 GMT

In <1ba14uINNi8f@shirley.cs.widener.edu> austin@cs.widener.edu (Jeff Austin) writes:

>Well,
>	Since I'm usually the first to say "In your Face" when the Eagles 
>	kick ass, I guess it's only fair to give credit where credit is
>	due.  Great Job, KC!  Marty really put together a great game plan.
>	I think he really caught Philly by surprise.  The Chief's excellent
>	usage of the passing game proved to exploit some real holes in the
>	Eagle's defense - they caught the birds sleeping a few times.  Even
>	though the Eagles were playing some good "catch up" late in the game,
>	KC had it won all the way.  So, you won't hear any excuses from me,
>	the birds just got outplayed.  

	It was a fantastic game.  Although it was obvious that the Eagles
were the better team, Dave Krieg was able to keep the Eagles defense off-
guard throughout the game, leading the way for two of the touchdowns.  As 
for the D, the Chiefs just wiped things up.  They stuffed Herchel Walker
TWICE on third down situations inside the Chief's 30-yard line, and their 
special teams blocked and tipped two field goals.

	I'm saying this as a die-hard Chiefs fan too...I know the Eagles 
were better, but the Chiefs' offensive strategy was completely different
from their previous games, and by the time the Eagles were able to learn
it and stifle it, it was too late.

[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]
[]  rich.				     Bradley University   []
[]  spork@camelot.bradley.edu		     Peoria, IL	 	  []
[]  CHIEFS ARE THE TEAM OF THE 90'S!!!				  []
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]
From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Preview, Pats vs. 9ers
Date: 9 Oct 92 16:12:03 GMT
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server

Overall I agree...except the part about the Pats QB.  Its easy to look lousy
on a lousy team.  Just look at Plunkett's record prior to wearing silver
and black.  This kid can be a good QB if he can get out of NE.
From: krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes)
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 19:31:20 GMT
Subject: Foolish Fish !!!
Organization: the HP Response Center, Atlanta
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro

I can't believe all the Dolphin hype, they won one big game in a row. Last
week was the first really good showing for their defense this season. It was
also Marino's first good ( by the standard He set)game. To see all the
talk of an undefeared season I think is really foolish.
This week they Play The Falcons and the game may be a cakewalk for the fish
but if the real Marino and the real Miami defense show, We got the game in the
bag.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kevinlu@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Kevin Lu)
Subject: Re: Need Answers not Finger Pointing
Organization: Monash University General Access Unix
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 13:36:07 GMT

Satish Nair (satish@a.chem.upenn.edu) wrote:
> Okay, the GIANTS start off with their worst record since the 1987 season
> going 1-4. The difference this time is that this is not a strike season and
> let's face it, things aren't aiming to get any better.  So my question, what
> should the GIANTS do next?
>

Well, there always the thought of getting Ray HAndleys head on a platter :-)
 
> They've really loaded up on offense during the last few drafts and these guys
> could really develop into something so don't mess with that.  The defense?
> Well, everyone says the defense is aging but come on now, don't Philly and
> Washington have defenses that are getting up there?  And they ended the 1991
> season ranked 1 and 3!  Coaching, okay ... get a defensive coordinator. But
> who?  Buddy Ryan?  And who for a head coach??  Can anyone offer any hope
> to a GIANTS fan that's really starting to feel it??
> 

How about getting the secondary to tackle properly.


> satish nair

  +----------------------------------------+-------------------------------+
  |  Kevin Lu                              | Monash University             |
  |  Email: kevinlu@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au  | Clayton, Victoria             |
  |                                        | Australia                     |
From: Michael.P.Colburn@dartmouth.edu (Michael P. Colburn)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: L.A. Rams
Date: 16 Oct 92 00:37:24 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a5@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <JIM.92Oct14093855@scf16.scf.loral.com>
jim@scf16.scf.loral.com (Jim Livesey) writes:

> 
>   What's the status of Robert Delpino??? How long will he be out??
>   
>   Even without him though they are still going to take it the Giants
>   this weekend!!  

I never wish any permanent harm to anyone, but I hope Delpino is out
for the Giant game.  He gives New York fits!!  I seem to recall at
least two prior Rams/Giant games where he's had a major impact on the
final score.  If he is out, I think the Rams will be in for a long
afternoon. 


Mike Colburn                         =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dartmouth-Hitchcock                  "Pulu-see-ba-goomba" -- Gilligan 
Medical Center                       =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lebanon, New Hampshire  03756        :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
Land of the Giants
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro