HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gswst@gl.pitt.edu (Gary S Wachs)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Needing not to Need
Date: 8 Apr 92 00:15:07 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Apr6.220105.23689@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca> userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca (Mark Israel) writes:
>In article <!tnjztr@lynx.unm.edu>, blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
>
>   "I need X" is a dangerous shorthand for "I need X in order to do Y."
>
>   "I need food" is shorthand for "I need food in order to live".  "I need a
>pencil" is shorthand for "I need a pencil in order to write."  
>
>   Next time you "need" something, ask yourself what you need it in order to
>do.

This is an excellent way to prevent yourself wasting valuable time and
resources on something you don't need (or could acquire an easier way).
It is often quite astounding to witness what ends individuals will go to
without even considering how important the results will be.  I think most
undergraduate college students would fit into that category, evidenced by
the enigmatic tendancy to major in subjects that have almost no chance of
ever leading to something marketable.  Or perhaps more specific to this
newsgroup, men and women who try so darn hard to start intimate 
relations with MOTOS without first getting their own lives into good
order.   If you need someone "to get your own life into good order", 
you've got other problems. 

Gar
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: pooh@group-w.uchicago.edu (Pooh @ the Utility Muffin Research Kitchen)
Subject: Re: Male visual orientationREFRESH
Organization: Medieval England, Iowa
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 02:50:18 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.005319.19993@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@isis.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>Good point--here I posted some of my thoughts about Pooh on soc.singles
>and I feel much better.  I think we can recommend this as a productive
>therapeutic technique and would suggest that everybody else to likewise.

It's a technique Dan Mocsny's been using for a long time now.  I'm
sure he feels better after posting some of his thoughts about me ...

But no thank you, folks, I have no desire to be the 
net.voodoo.doll.therapeutic.object of soc.singles.  Trygve, having
many more muscles, is a better subject of fantasies for women, and
I nominate Angelwing for the Soc.Singles.Fantasy.Goddess for
the male contingent.  Why, whenever she posts I can hear men
for thousands of miles around breaking into a sweat. :-)

>>ERNIE!  What ARE you doing with your rubber ducky????
>
>Why don't you step into my bubble bath and find out?

Just as long as you don't turn the jacuzzi jets on -- that
creates no small amount of chaos when you have bubble bath
in the water ;-)

>Almost--you know, maybe if we work on this a little more, flesh it out
>(so to speak), we'll even make it rival the one with the marachino 
>cherries, bungee cords, lava lamps, and double-stick tape.....

My personal favorite is still the one with the Croatian sword-swallowers,
Ben and Jerry's Chunky Monkey ice cream, three dozen emery boards,
an affection-starved chameleon, and Tiger Balm.

(Then again, maybe Dorothy Nelson, the Cosmique Muffin, had something
there when she requested to be dipped in a vat of chocolate in the
presence of three chocoholic David Bowie look-alikes ...)

Pooh
      pooh@group-w.uchicago.edu

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing)
Subject: Re: DOES ANYBODY REMEMBER...
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 16:44:53 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.130849.17065@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>
>Lick-'m-Aid?
>
>-Nance

Flavor Straws?

Angelwing - Strawberry or chocolate?

*------------------------------------------------------------------*
* Angelwing       |"Two things are wanted by a true man, danger and*
* U. of Washington| play - therefore, he seeks woman as the most   *
*                 | dangerous toy."       Friedrich Nietzsche      *
*------------------------------------------------------------------*
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: GCTHORNE@idbsu.idbsu.edu
Subject:      Summer of Love
To: soc.singles.usenet
Reply-To: GCTHORNE@idbsu.idbsu.edu
Organization: DEC Palo Alto
Date:         Mon, 13 Apr 92 20:57:55 MST


        Honestly.

        I can never tell what will set this group off.
        Here's the damn A R C post, made in fun, still living on.
        Serious minds want to know.


        Everyone in  Boise
        is giving me a shove
        to make *this*
        the summer of love, love, love.

        Or, as Angelwing would say     " heh heh "
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Trygve's 'Masculinity'
Date: 8 Apr 92 14:17:22 GMT
	<1992Apr5.214349.13105@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <6ynj3#d@lynx.unm.edu>
Organization: /theta/theta5/unc/martinc/.organization
In-reply-to: blowfish@carina.unm.edu's message of 6 Apr 92 09:05:33 GMT

In article <6ynj3#d@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:

   In article <1992Apr5.214349.13105@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@isis.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
   >That explains it--no wonder I don't understand men.
   >Trygve    (Sport?   Euuurgh.) 
   See. SEE! Trygve >is< a woman.
   Damn, i just >knew< it.
   Course, the net.droolers are going to be disappointed.....
   ';-)
   r.

Wait, Ron -- are you claiming that you *do* understand men?
--
Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Department of Computer Science/Sitterson Hall/UNC/Chapel Hill, NC 27599
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
The universe is full of magical things patiently waiting for our wits to
grow sharper.  -- Eden Phillpot, I'm told.  Anyone have a better reference?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius)
Subject: Re: The "first" "move" (was Re: A R C )
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 23:05:47 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <1992Apr11.205149.25729@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius) writes:
>
>>Shouldn't that be "Truffles (tm)"?.....
>>
>>Aahz - Chocolate and alcohol?  Yum!
>
>Chocolate and fungus. Hum.

Sir, I think what we have here is a failure to communicate.  
Truffles (tm) is a delightful concoction, a chocolate liqueur so
sinfully rich that it probably ought to be banned.  I'm not much of a
fan of alcohol in general, and I hate coffee, but once I put Truffles
into a mug of hot cocoa, I immediately understood *exactly* why so many
people rave over coffee and Kahlua.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Mothers are inventors by necessity
From: au138@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John S. Kennedy)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Newspaper personals (what's this about a freebie?)
Date: 9 Apr 92 19:22:42 GMT
Article-I.D.: usenet.1992Apr9.192242.13664
Reply-To: au138@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John S. Kennedy)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)


In a previous article, epg@nature.berkeley.edu () says:

>I placed a personal in my local freebie weekly.

I wonder if ther eare any "Freebie Weeklies" in Cincinnati ... hmmmm ...

Well ... in any case ... on the same topic ... it's coming up on two
years since I placed the ad in the Cincinnati Enquirer that resulted in 
the relationship that I had with Jan ... what with spring coming up and
all <<Grin>>.

So ... maybe around next week I'll give it another shot ... what have
I got to lose but about $50 checking messages on that damn 1-900 #???

<<Grin>>
     John
-- 
John S. Kennedy (513) 541-3078 |  It is better to be hated
axinar@tso.uc.edu              |  for what you are, than loved
au138@cleveland.freenet.edu    |  for what you are not.
72217.416@compuserve.com       |     -- Andre Gide
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Love: Is it a power thing?
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 06:25:15 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In  <1992Apr10.050246.13585@news.Hawaii.Edu>  venki@mpg.phys.hawaii.edu (N. Venkateswaran) writes:
>
>      I solicit your opinion on:
>      "In love, the one who loves less is the winner."

I think it's a sad soliloquy from a cynical sophist.
>
>      I believe that Love is a power play between 2 (or more?) individuals.
>      Love is used to control and mould a person to suit someone else's
>      perception.

I think you're wrong.  You may have had a bad experience, but that's
not what Love (with a capital L) is.

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: wong@bullet.ecf.toronto.edu (WONG  Peter Chih Chen)
Subject: Re: The "first" "move" (was Re: A R C )
Reply-To: wong@bullet.ecf.utoronto.ca (Peter Wong)
Organization: Dept. of Ind. Eng., U of Toronto, Canada
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 03:39:10 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.213935.26645@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
>
>>women has her eye on a man you can bet that sooner or later he's going to
>>figure it out.  I mean, she doesn't have to actually call him up and say
>>"Hey, you with the blinders on!  Let's go out!"  Just being available,
>>just being around, just smiling at the right time or arranging to be at
>>the same restaurant at lunch ...a zillion things.  Not necessarily
>>aggressive, but definitely aware.  Keep your eyes open, boys.
>
>>Angelwing - It's all in the way you look at it.
>
>If this is how you look at it, then you are correct. But the "first
>move" is more than a bit of flirting, it is, as you say, calling him
>up and asking him out [and the initiation of contact that leads to
>that. By my definition, you are just "dressing up" (in a manner of
>speaking) in order to catch his eye so that _he_ will make the first move.

The person making the "first move" is the one who breaks the ice. In
the above example from Angelwing, the ice hasn't been broken yet
and those inhibitions are still there. Usually it requires some
action to initiate a level of comfort as Kiran says. A good 
percentage of women who come on to me play with my hair or comment
about it. The ice can be broken before a single word is spoken.
I've also seen some women drag guys onto the dance floor or pinch
their bottoms. Come to think of it, few women feed guys pick-up
lines and instead use mild flirting to agressive man-handling 
techniques :-)

One thing to note though, if you're not agressive or at least quite
forward, you will spend a lot of time accomplishing little and perhaps
waiting too long to make the first move. I can't stand it when people
say, "Why doesn't (s)he notice me?!?" My reply is to push them to
make the first move or to do it on their behalf. If you want something...

--Peter
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: fredw@mks.com (Fred Walter)
Subject: Re: Burp. (was Re: THE ELEMENTS OF SEDUCTION)
Organization: Mortice Kern Systems Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 20:16:16 GMT

jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>fredw@mks.com (Fred Walter) writes:
>>	fred "I think it was the gas that made me post this" walter

>Nitrous or beans?
>Call me curious.

Carbon dioxide.

	fred
-- 
Disclaimer: everything I post is my *personal* opinion and does not represent
or reflect the opinion of the company which employs me.
From: snoopy@sopwith.uucp (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: sLIME Jell-O
Date: 14 Apr 92 06:35:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: sopwith.1992Apr14.063521.1062
Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm

In article <1992Apr8.154345.28355@u.washington.edu> intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
|In article <nsqj7!=@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:

|> Yergh! The return of Lime Jello!
|> I was SLimed just once, thankyouverymuch. Plenty for me. ';-)
|
| We had some at SeaBoink but I guess it was kept in reserve until things
| got entirely out of hand.  'Cause I never saw it.  Good thing, too.  I
| hear it's pretty tough to get sLime Jello off of gold lame.
|
| Angelwing - Not on MY dress you don't!

Angelwing, Dahling, you simply *must* get the cause and effect straight.
sLIME Jell-O is the *cause* of parties getting entirely out of hand.
And considering the talented hands at SeaBoink, it took quite a bit
to get things out of hand.  ;-)

I didn't hear of anyone getting sLIME Jell-O in their clothes.
Though for awhile we weren't sure if Paul was ever going to find his
watch...

    _____
   /_____\   Snoopy			  The government is not your mommy.
  /_______\   
    |___|    cse.ogi.edu!sopwith!snoopy
    |___|    {ares,illian,loop,parsely,qiclab,sequent,techbook}!sopwith!snoopy
From: snoopy@sopwith.uucp (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: sheep
Summary: Why are you fondling your lambswool sweater?
Date: 14 Apr 92 06:05:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: sopwith.1992Apr14.060541.931
Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm

In article <8kxjdlp.barry@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
|In article <1992Apr13.205329.26063@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:

|> So if I make an active effort to get Dan's goat I'm being an asshole, but
|> if the goat leaves for greener pastures on its own, then should we meet,
|> it's beautiful?
|>
|> I guess I feel a bit sheepish...
|
|	And well you should; this was a sheep shot if I've ever
| seen one.

Kenn, that was really baaaaaaaaad.  I'd think that Ewe wooled be
ashamed of yourself.

    _____
   /_____\   Snoopy			  "Daisy, Daisy..."
  /_______\   
    |___|    cse.ogi.edu!sopwith!snoopy
    |___|    {ares,illian,loop,parsely,qiclab,sequent,techbook}!sopwith!snoopy
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: sheep
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 18:08:51 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In article <8kxjdlp.barry@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
|In article <1992Apr13.205329.26063@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:

|> So if I make an active effort to get Dan's goat I'm being an asshole, but
|> if the goat leaves for greener pastures on its own, then should we meet,
|> it's beautiful?
|>
|> I guess I feel a bit sheepish...
|
|     And well you should; this was a sheep shot if I've ever
| seen one.

No, I feel sheepish because I'm a LAM.  Guess I pulled the woll over your eyes.
(Are we playing mutton Jeff now?)

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca (Mark Israel)
Subject: Re: The "first" "move" (was Re: A R C )
Originator: lnds@zeus.biochem.ualberta.ca
Organization: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 09:01:46 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.153327.27938@u.washington.edu>, intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:

> [...] even though a women *is NOT* obviously aggressive, if she's 
> interested it'd be fairly obvious to any man who doesn't have his head 
> in the clouds.  Get it?

   Ah, thank you!  I was wondering why everything looked so foggy.

userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca		Mark Israel
Instinctive grammatical moralizer.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing)
Subject: Re: The Second Move
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 15:23:50 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.131351.23839@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <1992Apr16.010444.7304@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>>intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
>>
>>>heaven's name, would I date men that I didn't choose to date?  
>>You might be stuck having to choose from among some class of men
>>who would choose you first. These men might not be your first choices
>>as partners.
>>
>Your stretchin it here Kiran,

Thanks James ... you took the words right out of my fingers!

> If your saying Anglewing has never 
>spoken to a man first, I doubt that.

Right.  In fact, the man I am currently involved with is a perfect
example.  I DID speak first.  But he's the one who asked if I wanted to
see a movie.

 >I now return you to your regularly scheduled cat fight.

Angelwing - Meeowrr- pfssstt!!

*------------------------------------------------------------------*
* Angelwing       |"Two things are wanted by a true man, danger and*
* U. of Washington| play - therefore, he seeks woman as the most   *
*                 | dangerous toy."       Friedrich Nietzsche      *
*------------------------------------------------------------------*


Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle)
Subject: The "first" "move" (was Re: A R C )
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 21:39:35 GMT

>tlode@isis.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>>It seems like the women I know who are happilly involved in a serious
>>relationship almost always were the ones to make the first move--which

intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:

>women has her eye on a man you can bet that sooner or later he's going to
>figure it out.  I mean, she doesn't have to actually call him up and say
>"Hey, you with the blinders on!  Let's go out!"  Just being available,
>just being around, just smiling at the right time or arranging to be at
>the same restaurant at lunch ...a zillion things.  Not necessarily
>aggressive, but definitely aware.  Keep your eyes open, boys.

>Angelwing - It's all in the way you look at it.

If this is how you look at it, then you are correct. But the "first
move" is more than a bit of flirting, it is, as you say, calling him
up and asking him out [and the initiation of contact that leads to
that. By my definition, you are just "dressing up" (in a manner of
speaking) in order to catch his eye so that _he_ will make the first move.

"Arranging to be at the same restaurant" is making the first move?
Sheesh. Gimme a break.
-- 
"The truffle is not an outright aphrodisiac, but it may in certain
 circumstances make women more affectionate and men more amiable."
                                                ...Brillat-Savarin

Xref: sparky soc.singles:10615 talk.bizarre:10422
From: war@wetware.com (Andy R.)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: helpful Hints on "elements of seduction"
Date: 7 Apr 92 23:00:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: wetware.1992Apr7.230049.3506
Organization: Dr. Gonzo's Land-O-Ammo

drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) warns:

] Do not try to use isotopes.

Personal experience talkin' Drieux?

That would explain a great many things that I have observed
wanderin' 'round the Castle upon returning from extended
trips.


"they" call me: mr. I STILL DON'T WANNT KNOW  Andy R.
(but tell me.)
-- 
If I had a hammer, I'd hammer all the folksingers.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca (Mark Israel)
Subject: Re: Male visual orientationREFRESH
Originator: lnds@zeus.biochem.ualberta.ca
Organization: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 08:52:58 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.222544.26970@midway.uchicago.edu>, pooh@group-w.uchicago.edu (Pooh @ the Utility Muffin Research Kitchen) writes:

> Now announcing Dr. Poohth's Wild Sex Thang School of Inner Beauty
> and Lime Jello Maneuvers !!  (gee, this is sounding more and
> more drieuxistic ...)

   Dr. Poohth!  Wow, that's a name I haven't seen for years!  Are you
going to revive some of your other names (e.g. E Pluribus Poohnum)?

> Our Motto: "Once You Drive Men Crazy Enough, They Don't Care How You 
> Look"

   Once you drive men crazy enough, they don't even care how crazy you
drive them.

userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca		Mark Israel
Instinctive grammatical moralizer.
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women,soc.men
From: diana@wetware.com (CatWoman )
Subject: Re: buying things
Organization: Castle WetWare MouseCatcher
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 20:15:10 GMT

shortell@spock.ecs.umass.edu (Laurel L Shortell) writes:

] blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
] >eleanor@ait.com (Eleanor Evans) writes:
] >>I'd like to buy a man thing--is there like a catalog, or something?  A
] >>toll-free number?  Where do I sign up?
] >
] >Well, I know where you can rent a great man thing- by the hour or day- with
] >the man still attached (that part being unfourtunately non-negotible ';-)
] >Leave a message at this here account ';-)
] 
] What a disgusting thing to say! She was asking an innocent
] question, and you felt you had to jump on the opportunity
] to spout vile comments? Keep it in your pants, buster.

Errrr.....

Is there a missing smiliey here Laurel??  Or do you not
know what a "man thing" is - specifically those attached
to ProblemYoungerMen...

Diana
(who is plotting how to get her ProblemYoungerMan - with
attached man thing - to come to MY place tonight so I 
will NOT have withdrawal symptoms...)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: polsak@nuscc.nus.sg (Suzaina Abdul Kadir (Ms))
Subject: Re: Love: Is it a power thing?
Organization: National University of Singapore
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 02:32:41 GMT



Looks like I'm getting to be a regular here...:-)

But, anyways, just wanted to comment on this issue
of whether love is a power thing/game or whatever
you want to call it...

Well, I must say that I agree. At least Love can be a
power thing. I was in one relationship in which I loved
whole-heartedly, and in the end got trampled and eventually
dumped. Then I was in another mini-relationship where I
learned to control my feelings and be in control over
the whole thing...in this instance it began to feel good.

Then again having somesort of power is a good feeling...

But I suppose as with other things, striking a balance
(i.e. equal 50/50 share of power in the relationship)
is the best.

BUT OH! POWER !!!

:-)

Suzaina

 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
Subject: Re: Peeking through the curtain
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 92 20:05:17 GMT
Organization: QQQCLC

In article <s4mjv9f@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
>In article <sxmjkx#.barry@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
>>	Stop squirming and answer the question. I'll start things
>>rolling by answering yours: yes, it's certainly possible to trust
>>someone who's been unfaithful to a previous partner. I'd trust such a
>>person - I prefer open relationships, and you _can't_ cheat in an open
>>relationship.
>
>Yes, but 'open' relationships generally mean 'non-monogamous' relationships-
>and in todays wonderful world of viruses, bugs and paternity suits, I can't
>imagine that 'open' relationships generally have the appeal they once did.

	Guess I shoulda used a smiley. I think the next sentence I
wrote after the paragraph you quoted was "but that's beside the
point". Open relationships lost their brief, faddish popularity
years ago, but those of us as like 'em, still like 'em. We're
still around.

>Calling a non-monogamous relationship 'open' is simply a candy coating for
>the fact that you can't trust your partner (or yourself) enough in a
>trusting relationship to remain faithful. IM(Never)HO.

	Sorry, the universe is a stranger place than you imagine.
With all the weird and wonderful forms of sexual eccentricity
people are into, do you really find a minor quirk like
lack of sexual jealousy that strange?

-  From the Crow's Nest  -                Kenn Barry
----------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTRIC AVENUE:    			barry@netcom.com
From: wjb@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Bill Buse)
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 21:10:40 GMT
Subject: Re: THE ELEMENTS OF SEDUCTION was (Re: Request : Dating advice from women)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Loveland, CO