HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: debraa@poof.WV.TEK.COM (Debra Aubrey;685-3679;63-356;;poof)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Eleni telling Frank
Date: 13 Nov 92 04:26:07 GMT
Article-I.D.: pogo.13926
Reply-To: debraa@poof.WV.TEK.COM
Organization: Tektronix, Inc.,  Wilsonville, OR


In article <1530@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM>, lhess@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM
(Leah Surber) writes: 
|> Any west coast viewers who did not get preempted during the middle?
|> Can you fill us in?  How did the breaking of the news happen?


Sketchily, at best ...

Eleni tells Frank ... Frank is elated, ecstatic, bouncing off walls.  He
assumes it is his and is sooooo happy.

Eleni is soooo unhappy, but Frank won't let her get a word in edgewise.
Finally she tells him to *STOP IT* and then tells him that the baby is
Alan-Michael's.

Why?  Because she was on the pill with Frank.  Frank puzzles over this and
Eleni finally tells him that she slept with A-M in Greece when he showed up
for five minutes.  Frank is totally pissed!

Eleni tries to defend herself telling him she had taken some of her
grandmother's sleeping pills and was dreaming about doing the *wild thing*
with Frank.  But then she woke up and there was A-M ... and they didn't do
anything, that I remember.

The question now is:  now that A-M knows, will he spill the beans about
switching the pills?

	Debbie.
From: es03@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ERIKA K. SELL)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: YYYYAAAAWWWWNNNN
Date: 13 Nov 92 15:29:26 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <Nov.12.18.40.54.1992.17921@andromeda.rutgers.edu>, giordano@andromed
a.rutgers.edu (E. Giordano) writes:
>
>     I just can't stand it----a after today's show
>in which AM found out about Eleni's preg and
>then OF COURSE (borign as can be)
>Eleni (whom I used to like alot)
>will not leave him, Frank is so understanding
>(I used to likehim alot also), this  story
>line I DID like until today -- whats the
>point, how much can this drag on,
>give me a break, I feel like smacking her
>upside the head once and for all, I am
>VERY disappointed here.
>
I agree with you 100%.  I do not think I can stand to look at Doe Eyes crying
over what to do I'm soooo confused. Get a life you people!!!!!! I could smack
them all with a 2x4.         Erika
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: spira@panix.com (Greg "Sarcasm Is A Way Of Life" Spira)
Subject: DOOL: Prime Time
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 01:01:12 GMT
Organization: Boo! 

Just wanted to note that the 3 year contract Corday signed with NBC that
others have mentioned includes a clause which enables DOOL to show a prime
time episode every year right before the broadcast of the Soapys.

Greg
From: gibbsm@ll.mit.edu (MargAret D. Gibbs)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: the pasta dinner
Date: 6 Nov 92 18:55:07 GMT
Organization: MIT Lincoln Lab, Lexington, MA

>In article <1992Nov5.211837.4349@dsd.es.com> apetty@dsd.es.com writes:
>>
>>	And how come Dixie doesn't have a table?


Annie, I was wondering the same thing!  It looked totally ridiculous
for everyone to be gathered around the coffee-table with their dinner
plates.  Not that anyone on the soaps actually *eats* anything...
they just push it around their plates.  I can just hear my mother
saying... "Don't play with your food!"

In article <1de8u0INN8pi@male.EBay.Sun.COM> girl@slavery.EBay.Sun.COM (Mary Smith) writes:
>And how come Dixie and Brian are ALWAYS eating spaghetti?
>
>Does Dix/BrI need cooking lessons??

Probably.  Tho I think Barbara was the worst cook I remember seeing
on AMC in recent years... wasn't she the one who cooked the turkey
without taking out the plastic-wrapped innards & neck?  Or did she
just burn it, or forget to defrost it?

Anyhow, back to this spaghetti thang... when I was living on my own,
I didn't feel like making anything fancy most times.  I alternated
between spaghetti and waffles for dinner, with an occasional meal
of macaroni and cheese.  Now my husband does the cooking!  :-)


-- 
Margaret D. Gibbs              "Practice random kindness and 
Assistant Staff	                 senseless acts of beauty"
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
gibbsm@ll.mit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mroberts@UTKUX1.UTK.EDU (Mary K.)
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: Skeleton Letter (was TAN: Letters to TAD)
Organization: University of Tennessee Computing Center
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 06:43:24 GMT

cpatters@ub.d.umn.edu (Granma) writes:
: >Dear Michael,
: >
: >We are a group of AMC fans who participate in a world-wide computer
: >network group called "rec.arts.tv.soaps" (RATS for short).  
: >
: >Ever since the character Tad left Pine Valley, we've been watching and
: >waiting for your return.  Only the real MEK will do!
: >
: >For years we've been speculating on whether or not the writers of AMC
: >read this group.  [This is your chance to give suggestions of how to
: >prove to us that they *do* read!]
: >
: >Welcome back to Pine Valley!!!
: >
: >
: >
: >I hope this is enough of a start... carry on, troops! :-)
: >
: >-- 
: >Margaret D. Gibbs              "Practice random kindness and 
: >Assistant Staff	                 senseless acts of beauty"
: >MIT Lincoln Laboratory
: >gibbsm@ll.mit.edu
: 
: 
: Hi Tad!
: 
: Ya, like Margaret said.
: 
: Also ... I've been watching AMC since 1970 -- when we first saw Ruth
: Martin walking down the path in the park.  (Remember Ruth?  No, I
: guess you wouldn't since you have amnesia now, huh?)  Anyway, Ruth
: is a nice person, sort of a busy-body, but then she means well.
: Anyway, I've enjoyed all the characters on AMC - EVEN THE ONES WHO 
: KEEP US IN SUSPENSE FOR OVER A YEAR!  (Does this person sound 
: familiar there Tadsky?) 
: 
: Seriously, we are thrilled that you are finally returning to Pine 
: Valley, and reprising the role of Tad.  Obviously, from the many fans 
: who have written you, you know you are a "wanted" man.  We've watched
: your metamorphosis from egotistical creep to gentle, caring man.
: I'm anxious to see what the writers have planed for your character. 
: (Of course, we all know that they can sometimes write a character 
: into a well, too!  Ha!)
: 
: Welcome back, MEK!  We've missed you!
: 
: Granma CJ
: *-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*
: |          "Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"	      |
: *-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*
: 
: Next ........
: 
Hey Tad!

  I "third" the sentiments of my afore-mentioned comrades.  I know I'm 
not the one who should tell you this, but you've lost your girl, Dixie.
She's gotten married and divorced and now she's playing around with a 
new boy-toy and seems to have forgotten all about you.  But not to
worry, though, because you also have a kid!  Yep, that's right, the ol
Brookster has borne you a child.  Now, the only reason I'm telling you
this is because I know how the writers are:  it'll be months before you
regain your memory and then it'll be months more before they tell you
anything.  So when you do find out, please act surprised, ok?  'Cause
"I'm not one to gossip, so you didn't get it from me!"  Got it.  See ya
soon, kiddo!

MaryK

Next ..........
From: reddy@88opensi.88open.ORG (Wasavika Reddy)
Subject: Re: DOOL: In Defense of Carly
Organization: 88open Consortium Ltd., San Jose
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 92 21:45:44 GMT

In article <4exexhu00WBM835lkV@andrew.cmu.edu>, Liz Fox <lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> [Vix not Lix]
>  
 --- STUFF DELETED
>  
> >    3. She doesn't get to write her own dialogues -  this may surprise
>  
> Yeah but she does get to choreograph her own pool table scenes and I
> lost any respect I had for the actress when SHE said that SHE liked
> 9 1/2 Weeks and choreographed her scene just like it.  Bleah.  This was
> simply repulsive and degrading towards women.  Period.
>  

  A lot of this seems to be speculation (other than the pool scene, I mean).
  Like, the writerrs deciding to leave out the rape stuff because she wants
  it that way etc. etc. 

  Also (Hi MJ) I need to clarify this: I'm just defending her - doesn't
  necessarily mean I like her. It just means I don't really dislike her.
  With everyone hammering away on her (like she's the cause of all evil
  in the world) I thought I should say a few words.
>  
> So, did I make your day?? ;)

  You sure did ;).
>  
> Vixenator
>  

  Wasavika

-- 
*****************************************************************************
Wasavika Reddy            uunet!88opensi!reddy           reddy@88open.org
Imagination is more important than Knowledge - Albert Einstein
*****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: Mike.Dunnagan@launchpad.unc.edu (Mike Dunnagan)
Subject: Re: GH: Holly using Quartermaine phone
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 19:30:49 GMT

An annoyed Trish said: <g>

> I know that the Quartermaines are supposed to be rich but didn't
> anyone else think that it was presumptuous of Holly to use their phone
> and call Constance in England?!?

What the hell do you expect. The bitch never works, has all these fabulous
clothes, goes to exotic islands to save the planet, has a $2.5 million
painint in her bedroom, sleeps with the boss, etc etc. She probably
charged it to Bill's account.

Actually I was expecting Tracy to say something about it, but she didn't. 


--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: morgan@math.psu.edu (Ilene Morgan)
Subject: SB:  Thursday's Show (possible spoiler)
Organization: Department of Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 15:53:20 GMT

If you haven't seen Thursday's show yet, you may not want to read this...


I *knew* it!  They kept "projecting" Mason's victory but never came out and
said it was official.  After the exchange between Mason and Julia toward the
end of Thursday's show,  I kept thinking that he's going so overboard in his
"I would have been a good loser" schtick that he's going to get a chance to
prove it!  I can't wait to see his reaction on Friday!  Who thinks that he
*won't* be the soul of good sportsmanship?!

Ilene
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: dooley@aurora.physics.utoronto.ca (Lois-Anna Dooley)
Subject: Re: GL
Organization: University of Toronto Physics/Astronomy/CITA
Distribution: rec
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:09:05 GMT

In article <1djuk7INN733@roundup.crhc.uiuc.edu> slonnegr@uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu (Andrew M. Slonneger) writes:
>Hi!  I've been a lurker for a while, but here's my first post:

Welcome!

>After several years of ridiculing my then girlfriend (now wife)
>about watching GL, she managed to get me hooked a couple of 
>summers ago. 

Ha - we got another one.

> (I must admit, however, that I am getting tired of
>the current stories)  

You and me both, and I bet there are others.

>I'm curious of others reactions to Holly in the election day
>show where she was in the bathtub with black rings under her
>eyes, dirty seaweed type stuff, and the scrub brush.  I thought
>it was a pretty revolting scene, but enjoyed it (Lady Macbeth-esqe).
>
>I believe that this *is* the way Ross sees Holly, at least
>subconsciously!
>
>Andy

I loved that scene and also immediately thought of Lady M.  At first
I thought the tub was full of blood and said "eeeeew" but then I
realized it was just twigs and gunk.  I've been expecting Holly to
go off the deep end for some time, and I wonder if this was foreshadowing
of some sort.  


Lois-Anna
From: lhess@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Leah Surber)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL : Ross's wet dream
Date: 10 Nov 92 13:21:20 GMT
Reply-To: lhess@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Leah Surber)
Organization: NCR E&M CLEMSON Liberty, SC

In article <1992Nov9.162151.56494@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> es03@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu
(ERIKA K. SELL) writes:
>
> Not too many people offered an opinion of the election day dream scenes -
> What did everyone think?
>  I thought the actors did a fine job in most scenes, although I thought the
>  show went over the edge of odd. I know I would have been smirking seeing
>  bitch mom covered in kelp.
>                                 Erika



I really liked it. Sure it was a bit overboard, but it gave me more insight
to Ross than the normal storylines have in the last year or so.  Kinda of
like the Nola dream scenes of years gone by.

L.

--
From: slaury@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Susan Laury)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: AMC: Update Thurs. Nov. 12
Date: 13 Nov 92 15:58:59 GMT
Organization: Indiana University


Argh! I taped the Clinton newsconference yesterday! AMC was preempted
because of Clinton's first news conference, and they showed it two
hours later than usual. I ususally tape all the ABC soaps, but didn't
yesterday, and thus I wasn't able to watch it.

Trish has wonderfully volunteered to do the update from memory,
so it should be coming soon. 

Thanks, Trish!

Sus.

-- 

"A day without denial is a day you've got to face."
	--Calvin (to Hobbes)
From: Joanna L. Castillo <pefv702@perv.pe.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: KL: Joseph Gian(Paige's ex)
X-Xxdate: Tue, 10 Nov 92 21:26:22 GMT
Organization: UT Petroleum Engineering Dept.
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 20:27:20 GMT

In article <Qezzjv600UhWA3SLs3@andrew.cmu.edu> Liz Fox, lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
>On 09-Nov-92 in Re: KL: Joseph Gian(Paige's..
>user Joanna L. Castillo@perv. writes:
>>Sigh...Jackie, *this* is a sure sign of a woman in dire need of help.  
>>Meg...Meg...Meg...please get help as soon as you can.  Being locked in 
>>a room with Mort won't do nearly enough for you...you need professional 
>>help.  And, well...Liz might get a little upset if you try to weasle in 
>>on the Tim-ster.  Anyway, please, Meg, I'm begging...get help.  Being
>>locked in a room with Tim would be pure heck.  :)
>
>Naahhh..:) Meg - go ahead - take Tim....Nico (oops - NICK!) is back this
>week and *he's* the man for me!!

Oh, so sorry...Liz, dear...but...well, I did lay claim to Nick weeks 
ago.  Jackie seems to think I'm willing to share him but I ain't.  You
can just keep Tim.  Oh...'scuse me...you and Meg can just fight over 
Tim.  Snicker snicker.

>-Liz

Joanna.

| \____ ----- ____/           |  "Let's just be friends -- friends    |
|      ( o o )                |  who never talk or see each other."   |
|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    |      - David Letterman, 7-22-92       |
|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! |           pefv702@perv.pe.utexas.edu  |
From: sdoshi@olaf.wellesley.edu (Sucheta Doshi)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GH: Tracy my darling
Date: 6 Nov 92 06:01:22 GMT
Organization: Wellesley College

In article <AewUCRm00WBO47dJVG@andrew.cmu.edu> Jennifer Allyson Turner <jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>>totally hypocritical - for example she complained Robert didn't
>>mourn her for very long while he thought she was dead..well, umm excuse
>>me but who was it who was romping around in San Sebastian with Sleazy
>>Simon while technically still married to Robert???? 
>> 
>>-Sucheta
>
>[ranting mode: ON]
>HE DIDN'T MOURN FOR HER FOR VERY LONG??????   HE MOURNED FOR HER FOR TWO
>@#!%^*& YEARS!!!  THAT'S NOT LONG?
>[ranting mode: OFF]
>
>Jenn
>

That's exactly what I meant.  Holly is SOOO petty and hypocritical that
she expected Robert to mourn forever even though he DID Mourn her for
the longest record breaking time ever on any soap!

GET A GRIP HOLLY!  The man had to get on with his life!

This is actually why I like Bile and Holy together.  That way, I can FF 
through two boring characters at the same time and am safe in the knowledge
that Robert and Holy will NEVER be an item again.
 
-Sucheta
From: pml@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (patricia.m.lott)
Subject: Y&R
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:07:36 GMT
Keywords: Soap time

Anyone who has been watching this past week, please help
me with this one.  Nikki discovered Victoria and Ryan in
a hotel room (because of Paul's phone call).  Nikki drags
her out, and they exchange words.  The next morning, Nikki
and Victoria exchange more words and Victoria runs out.
Nikki drags Vicky to a doctor for an HIV test (you know - the
virus that causes AIDS?).  In the meantime, Victor goes to
Paul's office to pay for his services and realizes Paul is
holding something back.  Now he insists on Paul telling him.
Paul finally tells Victor his little girl went to a hotel with
Ryan.  Victor blames it on Nikki and goes to see her.  After
Nikki tells him the full story, Victor goes looking for Ryan.
Victoria is with Ryan telling him what has happened so far with
her mom and tells Ryan she doesn't think Nikki will tell Victor.
After Victor leaves, Nikki calls Jabot to warn Ryan to get out
of Jabot.  Victoria and Ryan argue, and finally Victoria talks
Ryan into leaving.  When Victor arrives, Vicky is alone in Ryan's
office.  Victor and Victoria argue and Victor goes back to his office
giving orders to Connie (his secretary) about finding Ryan.  Ryan
is hiding out at Gina's going on and on about how he has ruined his
life and doesn't know what to do.  Then we see Ryan in Victor's office.
Yesterday the big fight occurred and at the end of the show, Ryan
was being arrested.  From the point where I said "The next morning"
I was under the impression this was all the same day.  However, in
another part of town, we have been through two days as evidenced by
Ashley's invitation from Blade.  She turned him down because Brad
called needing a shoulder to cry on.  On yesterday's show, Blade
came back because Ashley had called him to apologize, and he invited
her out for "tonight" (which was supposed to be the next day).  Am
I going crazy; am I confused; or is there a time zone somewhere in
the middle of Genoa City and it's one day in one part of town and
another day in another part of town?  Would someone kindly help me
clarify this?

Thanks much.
From: sandra@felix.filenet.com (Sandra Cole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: The Count's Pants :)
Date: 11 Nov 92 15:19:40 GMT
Reply-To: sandra@fritz.filenet.com (Sandra Cole)
Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA

In article <199211101422.AA03137@donne.unx.sas.com> alex@unx.sas.com (Alexandra Bost) writes:
#
#>Subject: Re: AMC: Thursday Update 11/5
#>From: debbiek@rruxc.uucp (25670s-kennedy)
#>
#>This was all ever so over-done with them wearing these
#>costumes, like it was the most normal thing in the world
#>to do but I gotta say, it was perfect.  I wish men still
#>wore pants like that!
#
#I read somewhere that Michael Nadar was in his late 40s.  I must 
#admit, he looks a LOT better in those pants than Jackson would!
#Isn't Walt Willey about the same age?  [He was looking a bit 
#pudgy in those bedroom scenes with Angelique!]

Hold on, Jackson doesn't have a monopoly on the pudgy market.  Count
Dim looked as if he could use a girdle himself :-)



Sandra Cole
sandra@felix.filenet.com
From: sally@remarque.berkeley.edu (S. A. Wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL
Date: 11 Nov 1992 23:10:14 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu

In article <lg3264INNps8@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> wanday@wandaful.Corp.Sun.COM writes:
>
>I am all for John, Jack/Jennifer/Abigail to have a major storyline but
>do we have to go through the money/gambling issue again with Jennifer
>leaving him?  I thought that Jack was a changed man ever since he learned 
>that he wasn't going to die?!
>
>Isn't there another type of storyline that these writers can come up with?
>After all there they are paid mucho deniero!!
>
>* Sigh! *
>
>Cheers,
>Wanda2
>
>P.S.  Did anyone else catch the U2 concert at the Oakland Coliseum Saturday?
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Wanda Y. Wong				Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>wanda.wong@Corp.Sun.COM			Palo Alto, CA
>(415) 336-7827
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>



Well, AGAIN I don't think that these are necessary what is going
to happen. I got the info. from this supermarket tabloid. It
seemed more like the spoilers were more guesses than actual
"spoielers." Also, what with this new writer, I get the impression
that J&J, and John will actually have a bigger role in the show,
and more interesting storylines. I think that the mystery of
their house will be the highlight for their storyline, and
will focus on all the Hortons.

One last thing, I get a kick out of the way Jack refers to
Abbey as "the Child." This is very much in keeping with his
character--remember how he continued to refer to Jen as Ms.
Horton; even on their wedding day? It is for little triffles
such as this that I enjoy Jack so much--Matt so much. He
just adds so much to the role.


Spudnix--'allo; 'allo? What has happened to Sister Stinky??--Peel.


-- 
Amore e 'l cor gentil sono una cosa,	   |||	 Sally A. Wilson
  si come il saggio in suo dittare pone	   |||	 Spudnix Peel
  e cosi esser l'una sanza l'altro osa     |||	 sally@mica.berkeley.edu
  com'alma razional sanza ragione.  [_Vita_Nova_ XX, Dante]
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: gibbsm@ll.mit.edu (MargAret D. Gibbs)
Subject: Re: R.a.t.s. NOT in Times today
Organization: MIT Lincoln Lab, Lexington, MA
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 16:27:40 GMT

In article <97205@netnews.upenn.edu> isler@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (Sylvia Isler) writes:
>A special section was printed in the Sunday times about computers. In
>it were two brief articles on online bulletin boards. The internet was
>not mentioned. The articles spoke of America Online, Prodigy, and
>computerserve.  There were no bylines and Grimes' name was not
>mentioned. 

I just went to the library again and checked out Wednesday's and
Thursday's NY Times - no article. :-(  I then checked the Sunday
Times and saw the same article that Sylvia did.  I think only the
commercial networks/bulletin boards were mentioned, because the
whole pullout section was advertisements.  I'm hoping that Grimes
knew this advert was going out on Sunday, and was thinking of 
writing a follow-up article on *non-commercial* networks like
Usenet.  Nancy, do you know?


-- 
Margaret D. Gibbs              "Practice random kindness and 
Assistant Staff	                 senseless acts of beauty"
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
gibbsm@ll.mit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: gck@hector.uucp (24641-kemmerling)
Subject: AMC
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Distribution: us
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 21:04:09 GMT
Keywords: Update

help!!  I have not had a chance to watch AMC or read the posts 
for about a week and a half.  Would some kind soul please send me 
the highlights from the past week and a half?

I'd be most grateful!

gayle
E-mail address: gck@hector.cc.bellcore.com 
Morristown, N.J.
(201) 829-3950
From: crobshaw@rd.hydro.on.ca (Catharine Robshaw)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ALL: Canadian updates
Date: 13 Nov 92 13:49:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: rd.1992Nov13.134934.24724
Organization: "Ontario Hydro - Research Division"

: Unfortunately, we were graced with Mr. Clinton's presence here in Canada too.
: (Not that I have anything against the man, but couldn't they wait until the
: 6:00 news for this stuff!!!)
: 
: 
I haven't missed any of the shows this week.  Let me know where you left
off and I will post an update of that show.

Catharine
From: US29923@VM.CC.LATECH.EDU (Mary Ann Monnin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Eleni telling Frank
Date: 10 Nov 92 21:27:02 GMT
Article-I.D.: VM.1689BD950.US29923
Organization: Louisiana Tech University

In article <oezyx0r0Bwx2QCx6IW@transarc.com>
Megan_DeFrancis@transarc.com writes:
 
>
>
>
> I believe I may have missed something here... did Eleni tell Frank about her
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
>(I'm rather new to the bboard) - but did anyone ever notice how funky those
>little bends in Roger's ears are????
>
>  -Megan
> Those ears of his have driven me crazy ever since he came back to the show!!
 He looks like a deformed Spock!
>
Mary Ann