HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: bitmaps editor, capture
From: sbgros@skcla.monsanto.com
Date: 12 Aug 92 10:29:45 GMT
Organization: Searle, Skokie, IL
Nntp-Posting-User: ferro

I am looking for a TSR or some other program that can capture screen
images (graphics) and store them into a bmp or other type of graphics file.
do such things exist?  Or is there a bitmap editor available?

thanks

scott gross
SBGROS@MONSANTO.COM

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: lchiu@animal.gcs.co.nz (Laurence Chiu)
Subject: PCX File to HP Laserjet Macro
Keywords: PCX PCL Laserjet 
Organization: GCS Limited, Wellington, New Zealand
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 04:13:40 GMT

I have a PCX file which I would like to download to my LJIIP as a macro
and to stay there. Then I can imbed the appropriate PC commands in my
document to call it up (it's an invoice header and I want to just send
down the invoice details).

I have thought of the following option. Print the PCX file via some Windows
package (Paintbrush) to a PCL file. Edit this PCL file to add macro definition 
commands to the beginning and end of the PCL file. Download to the printer.
This sounds a bit tedious. Does anybody have any easier alternatives to
suggest. Is there a program out there that will automate this?
Thanks

Laurence Chiu
lchiu@animal.gcs.co.nz
From: peters@CS.ColoState.EDU (eric peters)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: program to search for IRQ
Date: 17 Aug 92 06:13:58 GMT
Organization: Colorado State University, Computer Science Department

i recently got a new modem for the low price of nothing.  The porblem is,
that i don't have any docs for it.  I installed it, and got my pc to
recognise the serial port, but the modem won't work.  I'm fairly certain
that the reason is because the IRQ is set wrong on the modem.  I've tried
all the different combos, and nothing works.  Is there a program (shareware,
or pd) that will tell me the IRQ the card is using (not what it is supposed 
to use, i have several that tell me that)?    

email please

thanks
-- 
Eric Peters   
peters@CS.Colostate.EDU
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Tuesday, 18 Aug 1992 13:24:30 EDT
From: <IP25179@portland.caps.maine.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: CRONOLOGIA demo

  I just downloaded and watched the Cascada demo CRONOLOGIA (1991: can be
  found at saffron.inset.com).  Now that the desire to slit my wrists has
  passed ( ;)  It's a great demo, folks -- very depressing for a beginning
  PC graphics programmer; though it's nice to know one *can* do such things)
  I have lots of questions.  I shall only ask one, though, 'cause I'm liable
  not to understand the answers to any of the others.

  I was under the impression that the physical size of the written-to screen
  was hardware controlled.  This is obviously erroneous given that the Cascada
  folks not only make it large enough to have sprites go off the physical top
  of my monitor screen, but they also make it smaller (for proof of both of
  these, watch the first section of the demo [parts 000 and 001] with the
  contrast all the way up, so you can see even the 'black pixel' scan-lines).
  So, the question:  Anyone want to speculate on how they did it?  My mind
  just boggles at the thought.

  Thanks for your time.
  -Iain Odlin, who notes that everyone's gotta start somewhere.
From: 11dmcvay@gallua.gallaudet.edu (Daniel T. McVay)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: What's the Best PD term program?
Date: 16 Aug 92 02:26:45 GMT
Organization: Gallaudet University

In article <114975@muvms3.bitnet>, rcbi110@muvms3.bitnet (R. ALAN MONROE) writes:
> 
> The subject says it all...  My brother just bought a used xt laptop, and the
> guy gave him QuickLinkII with it, but it is pretty crummy.
> 
> Any recommendations?
> 
> ((   ||  /\\ \\  / /\\  ((      R. Alan Monroe       ((  I'm not an actor, ((
>  )) _// /--\\ \\/ /--\\  )) rcbi110@muvms3.wvnet.edu  )) but I play one     ))
> ((              _       ((                           ((  on T...   Hey!!   ((
>  ))  ||  /\\  //  ||_/   ))    Pinkwater Rules!       )) Who wrote this     ))
> ((  _// /--\\ \\_ || \  ((            :^)            ((  script!?!?!   -me ((
> 

One thing first, your sig is over 4 lines long. It's too long by SIG standards
on this net :-)...  And as to the best PD term program, nothing can beat
a TELIX. It has so many downloading and upload protocols. And the support
behind it is unbeatable.

QMODEM is pretty kewl too, but I use TELIX.

-- 
Daniel Mcvay	11dmcvay@gallua.gallaudet.edu	11dmcvay@gallux.gallaudet.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
	Wisdom was not at the top of the Graduate-School,
		mountain but there in the sandpile at Sunday School.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: pgenualdi@ws02.ips.iacd.honeywell.com (Patty Genualdi)
Subject: More info needed on Asymeteric Toolkit or Toolbook?
Keywords: Asymeteric Toolkit
Organization: Honeywell Industrial Automation & Control
Distribution: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 00:13:11 GMT

Hi,

I am looking for more information on a Windows 3.1 product which allows the user
to configure placement of the windows, define pop-ups, etc. I heard there 
was a product which did this called either Toolkit or Toolbook and the
company which made it was called something like Asymeteric.  Does anyone
have more information on this product or know where I can get more?

Thanks in advance.

Patty Genualdi      pgenualdi@ws02.ips.iacd.honeywell.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: singer@uwovax.uwo.ca
Subject: New Compac Line Opinions Sought
Organization: University of Western Ont, London
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 13:33:02 GMT

There has been much advertising of Compaq's new line--the Prolinea
budget-priced computers, and the QVision group--but I haven't yet been able to
see one locally. I wonder if anybody has yet had a chance to buy one of them or
to evaluate either? I am particularly interested in how good the graphics are
in the sense of speed (Windows) and crispness. The advertising seems to promise
the world (doesn't all advertising?). I wonder if there are any advantages in
this sense with competitive Dell and NEC machines.-- 
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:11734 comp.os.msdos.apps:4448 comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:3330
From: reisert@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Jim Reisert)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: Why do people want PD software?
Date: 21 Aug 92 20:17:34 GMT
Reply-To: reisert@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Jim Reisert)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation -- Maynard, MA


I understand the differences between Shareware, Freeware and true
public-domain software.  My main concern is this:

People ask for recommendations of shareware to do a job.  It seems to
me that some piece of commercial software might do the job also.  For
example, "Please point me at a PD Fortran compiler".  Now I don't know
of too many PD Fortran compilers, certainly no free ones, but I'm sure
there are at least several in the commercial market.  So why ask only
about PD Fortran compilers?  Either the person has another source of
information about commercial software (strange, since I'm sure a lot
of us have experience in that area, and could offer good opinions), or
is unwilling to consider commercial software for some reason.  I was
just trying to understand the reasons that PD software (including
Freewrae and Shareware) is sought after, above and beyond commercial
software.  To me, given equal functionality and comparable prices, the
only difference I can see is that one doesn't necessarily have to pay
for shareware in order to use it, but one does have to pay for
commerical software.

My comment about 'buying the best software, regardless of its origin'
just means that if I have a need (like an address book, for example),
I want software that will perform the task in the way that is most
suitable for me.  In fact, I have registered two shareware packages
(Names & Dates, and NameBase) just for this purpose (N&D won't run
under OS/2).  I don't have tons of money to spend on software either.
But I'd rather buy one good $100 commercial package than spend a lot
of time evaluating a bunch of crappy ones (yes, time *is* money to
some people).

- Jim

--
James J. Reisert                Internet:  reisert@sttng.enet.dec.com
Digital Equipment Corp.         UUCP:      ...decwrl!sttng.enet!reisert
146 Main Street			Voice:     508-493-5747
Maynard, MA  01754		FAX:       508-493-0395
Newsgroups: comp.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc
From: discar@nosc.mil (Joe Discar)
Subject: Re: Optimizing 386SX-16's for Windows
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 21:51:41 GMT

In article <sheldon.713715436@pv141b.vincent.iastate.edu> sheldon@iastate.edu (Steve Sheldon) writes:
>
>>1) Buy new vga/svga cards/monitors for them - how much faster would
>>   this make them?
>
> I take it you mean that the monochrome monitors are Herc TTL?
>I have a Everex mono VGA, with a Trident 8900 card, and it works fine.
>You're talking about $150 for VGA card(256K does fine), and mono
>VGA monitors.
>  This would probably give you a better display.  I don't know if
>performance would increase.


Nope.  To be honest, if you have a newer monochrome adapter (the ones that
use VVLSI instead of TTL), Windows video is just about as fast as you can
make it.  The older (including the original) Herc cards are slower because
of the technology/memory/circuitry used in the cards--but even so, herc
cards are usually more than four times faster.  Why, you ask?  Simple:
Monochrome graphics cards only have to move 720x320 pixels that have only
two states: on or off.   A VGA card has to do 640x480x16, an SVGA has to 
do 640x480x256, 800x600x16 (or 256), or 1024x768x16 (or 256)--there is
much much more junk to shove across the bus.  SVGA is probably the slowest
of the slow: in order to fit the 256K, 512K, or one Meg of video RAM into
a mappable area, SVGA's employ a rather elaborate planing scheme (mappable
pages) which also add to speed deficiency.

The problem with Monochrome graphics/Windows is that Windows tends to
try to "dither" colors to achieve a rudimentary greyscale... this cuts down
the overall resolution so that some Windows Apps cannot fit on the desktop
at all (I'm thinking about Corel Draw here).  Others work simply mahvelous
(Winword 2.0 and Excel 4.0)... but appear to be slow because the system
I'm running them on is slow.


>
>>2) Add lots of ram (would RAM + a Cache be a good way to go?)
>
> Bingo!  4 Megs minimum.  I have 5 Megs of RAM in my machine, and it
>is running faster than any DX machine I've seen with only 2 Megs of
>RAM under windows.

Hear Hear!  RAM is probably the best way to increase speed (next to
purchasing a 486/50, of course).   I've also found that Smartdrv.sys
with sufficient RAM also adds immensely to Windows efficiency.

> Better yet, scrap the Windows kludge.  The normal DOS applications work
>a hell of a lot faster, using less resources.


If GUI isn't necessary, this is a good alternative.  Using Word 5.5 versus
WordWin is always viable, using Quatro Pro instead of Excel 4.0 works well
too.  But if you need particular applications because you really NEED them,
a 386sx-16 should work just fine until you can afford to get something 
better.


Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:11683 comp.os.msdos.apps:4421 comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:3325
From: simon1@bass.bu.edu (Simon Streltsov)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: Why do people want PD software?
Date: 20 Aug 92 13:58:31 GMT
Reply-To: simon1@bass.bu.edu (Simon Streltsov)
Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Organization: Boston University

I would like to hear from some shareware authors,
or anybody else has statistics :
1/  What is the typical percent of people, 
who register shareware vs. those, who just 
"try it for some time".
2/ How does it depend on price and availability
of next version of the program after registration?

3/ How many people use shareware - popular things
like pkzip and programs like calendars, drivers for
special needs, stand-alone utilities...
 Maybe there is some statistics on SIMTEL regarding this?
 But it still will be number of people, who try, not of
those who use it

4/ How many people get it from SIMTEL and other archives vs.
those, who get it through mail-companies, who distribute
disks with shareware?


Any opinions?

Thanx in advance,

Simon Streltsov			    	! Disclaimer :
PhD Student,				! I can not speak for the
Dept. of Manufacturing Engineering	! Engineering Dept, ONLY because
Boston University			! I claim to be a mathematician..
From: rad@railnet.nshore.ORG (Rick DeMattia)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Internet Connection from Home
Keywords: Internet,Connection,Home,Modem,Cost,How
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 92 20:32:48 EDT
Distribution: na
Organization: Railnet BBS +1 216 786 0476

lodzins@pilot.njin.net (Dean Lodzinski) writes:

> 
> How would I go about getting an Internet connection from home?  I
> don't mean be connected all the time, but how would I be able to call
> someplace and pick up Internet mail and Usenet news?  Does anyone have
> information on this?  Please email me.

Check out the nixpub list in comp.misc or alt.bbs - look for a
public unix site in your area.  There you may be able to obtain
a login, and retireve mail and Usenet news.

--
UUCP: {uunet|backbone}!railnet!rad   rad@railnet.nshore.org
CompuServe: 72517.666@compuserve.COM
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.programmer
From: gregh@alw.nih.gov (Gregory Humphreys)
Subject: Re: Mem in dos 5.0
Organization: National Inst. of Health, DCRT, CSL
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 17:50:44 GMT

Make sure you have DOS=HIGH,UMB in your config,sys, and 
play around with EMM386 [RAM|NOEMS].  Try changining to NOEMS or whatever.

-- 
Greg Humphreys    |  "Playing not to win is like sleeping with your 
gregh@alw.nih.gov |  sister - sure, she's a great piece of tail, 
                  |  and she's got a bag full of goodies, but it's 
(301) 402-1817    |  just plain illegal."  -Charlie Sheen, "Hotshots"
From: roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: THE MOST TASTELESS OS (MSDOS)
Keywords: Unknown
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 92 13:59:06 CDT
Organization: Villa CyberSpace, Minneapolis, MN

nunn@nutmeg.cs.ntu.edu.au (JsNO  BAR---NUNN) writes:

[a fairly interesting rant, for the most part]

>     - MSDOS has got a pretty bad file management system.    
[...]
>  Secondly, It stores all the address pointers in one place, which to me,
> seems pretty stupid. The C-64's method (which I think is a romper room
> verion of CP/M), distributes it's pointers where the data is (it actually
> links blocks together that store a given file).

Well, if you lose the directory entry, you lose the file.  Under the
linked-block strategy, the same thing applies, though.  And... if you
use linked blocks, fseek(file,0,SEEK_END) takes bloody forever!

> The UNIX system is perfect,
> nothing bets UNIX. UNIX rules the world and UNIX was implemented properly!.

Perfect?  Nawww.... nothing is perfect.  But for the most part, I'd
rather be writing for Unix than MS-DOS.  The only thing is, my employer
has all these DOS machines around. :-)
--
Due to failure of my mail connection, please use the following emergency
                          addresses to reply:
roy%cybrspc@tfsquad.mn.org   cybrspc!roy@tfsquad.mn.org   roy@tfsquad.mn.org
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: rahardj@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Budi Rahardjo)
Subject: Re: THE MOST TASTELESS OS (MSDOS)
Keywords: Unknown
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 12:18:41 GMT

In <1992Aug22.055509.3859@dmp.csiro.au> lachlan@dmp.csiro.au (Lachlan Cranswick) writes:

>georged@sequent.com (George Dolbier) writes:
>>>CONCLUSION:
>>>  Microsoft!!....invent UNIX and make it free. The UNIX system is perfect,
>>>nothing bets UNIX. UNIX rules the world and UNIX was implemented properly!.
>>>If you can't do that, give us the source code for messy. At least that way,
>>>32 bits hackers can built it 32 bits.
>>I guess you have not really looked at the guts of unix have you.... 
>>You should not open yourself to snipers by comparing DOS to UNIX. They are
>>just not compareable.

>Right on Bro!!!
>Would anyone out there in net-land flame me for suggesting that the
>above above BOZO has never had to install or maintain a UNIX system.  
>Unix may be good if you have someone else to keep
>it going for you (i.e. the systems manager)
>but try installing it!!!  At least DOS is relatively simple but -

FYI, Linux (a free unix clone for 386 and above) is easy to install.
Just copy (use rawrite.exe to be exact) the boot disk and root disk,
insert the boot disk and ctrl-alt-del ... that's it.
Follow up to comp.os.linux


-- budi
-- 
Budi Rahardjo <rahardj@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Unix Support - Computer Services - University of Manitoba
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: ggg@kepler.unh.edu (Gregory G Greene)
Subject: Re: OS/2, VERY cool!
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 14:48:14 GMT

>> 	The problem is, it looks like games that implement some wierd
>>    memory management scheme or other type of customization are on the 
>>    rise.  Look at Links386 Pro, it won't work under OS2 either.  If 
>>    Origin used a special memory manager for Ultima 7, I think they will
>>    probably use one for Strike Commander, and probably for WC 3.  It 
>>    really stinks that you won't be able to play these games with OS2.
>> 
>> 							G.Greene
>
>I hope that everyone realizes that these same games ALSO don't work
>under Windows, or DESQview X, or any other 386 specific operating
>environment.  This is not an OS/2 problem, this is a problem of game
>developers not using "standard" memory management techniques such as
>DPMI.

	I really didn't mean to imply that it was OS2's fault.  Just that
   games that use these custom modes seem to be getting more popular.  I
   myself have the boot manager installed and have a pure DOS 5.0 partition.

							G.Greene

>
>-- 
>- Kevin Lowey (Lowey@Sask.USask.CA)
From: Hamish.Moffatt%f3.n30173.z3@cloud.pub.uu.oz.au (Hamish Moffatt)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Can I use 8087 on 80286 motherboard?
Date: 13 Aug 92 09:45:29 GMT

In a msg on <Aug 01 01:23>, CHU JEFFREY (chuj@horton.Colorado.EDU ) writes:

 CJ> cost).  It is suppose do 3x the performance compare to the 
 CJ> built-in co-processor.  All 486DX (exception of a few) have 

I think I read somewhere that the Weitek is for simple mathematics, while the
Intel is for floating point. eg they both have seperate purposes. Can anyone
confirm this?


Hamish
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
From: mjo@ef2007.efhd.ford.com (Mike O'Connor)
Subject: Re: Why do people want PD software?
X-Disclaimer: Not an official spokesperson for Ford OPEO
Reply-To: Mike O'Connor <mjo@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com>
Organization: International Affairs, Overseas Engineering, "Fordz"
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 02:57:38 GMT

In article <1992Aug19.180643.24274@PA.dec.com>
reisert@sttng.mlo.dec.com (Jim Reisert) writes:

:Several times a week, someone posts an article to a newsgroup asking
:something like, "What's the best PD/shareware program to do XYZZY?"
:Why don't they just ask, "What's the best program to do XYZZY?"  Why
:is PD/shareware specifically requested?  Is it:

PD/shareware is specifically requested because not everyone has the
luxury of being able to spend cash on a particular product.  With
shareware, I've noticed, licensing comes after extensive use and an
overall feeling of guilt or fear with someone who is authorized to
purchase software.  Also, with PD/shareware, one tends to get "da
source" rather than "vendor support" which in some circles is A Good
Thing (tm).

:Personally, I want the best software for the job, whether it's
:shareware, freeware, commercial software, or something I have to sit
:down and write myself.  My gut feeling (call me cynical) is that it's
:tempting to obtain shareware to perform a task, and not register it.
:After all, the hardware itself isn't a real money sink, it's the software.

I could make a slam here regarding DEC's hardware and software pricing
right about now, but I'm biting my tongue.  (Ken Olson's on Ford's
board of directors, and even though this post doesn't represent anyone
else besides myself, I still want to be tactful.)  Typically, people
whose job it is to make miracles happen with software and hardware are
NOT the same people that have much of a say in what gets purchased.  


						...Mike
-- 
 Michael J. O'Connor           |  Internet:  mjo@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com
 Ford Motor Company, OPEO      |  UUCP:      ...!{backbone}!fmsrl7!mjo
 20000 Rotunda, Bldg. 1-3001   |  Phone:     +1 (313) 248-1260
 Dearborn, MI  48121           |  Fax:       +1 (313) 323-6277
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: cs191049@cs.brown.edu (Tony Lee)
Subject: Postscript drawing program for dos or tif->ps converter
Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science
Distribution: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 02:47:57 GMT

We're looking for a dos program which can convert tif files to
postscript or for a drawing program, either pd, shareware, or
commercial which can generate postscript files directly.
Something similar to the Unix utility idraw would be nice....

Please post or e-mail directly to

Tony Lee
cs191049@cs.brown.edu or
tsl@lems.brown.edu

thanks in advance

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: karches@utdallas.edu (Tom Karches)
Subject: Re: PC printing to Mac printer on Ethernet: how?
Organization: Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 01:17:34 GMT

In article <1992Aug12.233406.12959@sura.net> wbarnes@sura.net (Bill Barnes) writes:
>We currently have a group of Macs and one PC on an Ethernet network
>connected to a bunch of Sun and DEC workstations.  The Macs are using
>Ethertalk for printing and file sharing and Ethernet for MacTCP related
>things.  We have an HP LaserJet IIISi currently hooked up to one of
>our Macs, which is in turn running Liaison so all the other Macs can
>print to it.  We would like to be able to print from the PC to the
>HP.  What do we need to do?  I assume we need to run some sort of software
>on at least the PC side, if not the Mac side as well.  Is there any
>way we can use CAP (which we're currently using so our Unix machines can
>print to the HP)?
>
>Thanks in advance for any help given.

There is a new product from CoOperative Printing Solutions called
COPS Talk. It lets a PC running Windows print to AppleTalk printers
and access data on AppleShare file servers.

Price will probably be between $100 and $120. It was just announced at
MacWorld; all I have is a flyer.

Their number is (404) 840-0810.

Regards,
Tom Karches
karches@utdallas.edu
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Karches          |"If rap music had been around when I was a kid,
karches@utdallas.edu | I would have become a musician instead of a politician."
karches@holonet.net  '-------------------------------------- Richard Nixon
From: bigfoot@pro-gallup.cts.com (Darren McDaniel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: What's the name for the OS/2 Newsgroup??
Date: 21 Aug 92 20:11:12 GMT
Organization: ProLine [pro-gallup]

Hello all.. I was wondering if anyone could tell me what the name of the
OS/2 newsgroup(s) are..  Please email it to me since I don't really think
that this is a proper place for this type of thing... :)


Darren
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: kchan@cory.Berkeley.EDU (CHAN KAM HUNG)
Subject: Booting from the B: drive
Organization: University of California, at Berkeley
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 00:37:16 GMT


Anyone know how I can make my pc boot from the B: drive instead of
the A: drive?  Are there any programs out there that can do that?...
don't really want to open up the case to switch the cables. Thanks.

Please e-mail all responses.

				-Kam Chan