HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?))
Subject: Re: Bi Quotes and Red Heads
Reply-To: pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 18:03:55 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.092617.8690@latcs1.lat.oz.au> woodhous@latcs2.lat.oz.au (Joe P Woodhouse) writes:
>I'd been getting a little sad,
>thinking "no-one seems to want to flirt with me...". 

<gasp> on soc.bi!!!  not possible!  

>The wiser more sensible
>self said that
> (i) most people would be wanting to flirt with MOTSS, and

oh no, i'm an equal opportunity flirter by *gender*... it's 
just *hair*color* i'm partial to!!!  ;)  

>(ii) most of the flirters are female,
>so it's not really surprising...but who listens to wiser sensible selves
>when you're feeling a bit down?

*e-kiss*  BIG *e-hug* to cheer joe up...

>   I think I'm a bit extra sensitive at the moment, because the recent push
>by my SO & I to get LaTrobe's GL Society to embrace Bi issues has generated
>the most amazingly heated and nasty statements. I don't think I've ever had
>so many people all yelling at me at once. It's wierd, one meeting everyone
>seems happy to include Bi's, the next, Bi supporters are almost a minority.
>I've never liked not being liked, and this is "not being liked" in spades.

yuck.  this is a fairly familiar tune, isn't it.  bigotry is 
really ugly.  yopu know, that's a good line to try... (i'm 
stealing an idea from star trek:tng here...  on the first show, 
riker (first officer) meets data (android) for the first time.  
in answer to an outright question, riker admits that he is a 
bit bothered about working with an android.  data's response
is something like: that's okay.  many people are prejudiced.  no
doubt some star trek type will now flame me for butchering the 
line, but the point is that riker is quite taken aback, at being 
referred to as a bigot.  he actually starts to protest and 
changes his mind because he sees data is correct.  naming can 
be powerful, you know.  just a thought.  

>I still like old-fashioned MOTOS hugs too...

oooh, yes!  don't we all?  
;)
peg
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: e-flirts
From: pwiebe@ecst.csuchico.edu (stephanie mandell)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 10:27:21 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico

In article <1992Apr16.140207.6246@panix.com> ro@panix.com (r l reid) writes:
>In article <1992Apr15.152007.11950@ecst.csuchico.edu> pwiebe@ecst.csuchico.edu (stephanie mandell) writes:
>>In article <20206@castle.ed.ac.uk> sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (S Hopkins) writes:
>>
>>>Shy, huh?  Hmmm ... and I'm tee-total ... and celibate ...
>>>
>>So, Sara, looks to me like you're knocking celibacy.  
>>
>>I wouldn't call it a desired state of mind but sometimes it's the
>>right one.
>
>Hmm, I didn't read it that way at all.  And I'm "tee-total", and
>didn't take offense, and have at times been celibate by choice,
>and didn't take offense.
>
>What I read into it was that Sara is - no way to put this delicatly,
>is there? - enthusiastic about drink and sex.  Not that it was
>some one true way of being.
>
>Now, if I should have been offended, I hope Sara will correct me.

I apologise.  I see the sarcasm.  I was in a bad mood.  I am
occasionally humor impaired.  I will go sit back down on the
couch and blow bubbles for a while.  

>Tho *I* usually prefer to top...

See, I knew you weren't shy.

Steph
From: iw@tosser.Rational.COM (Iseult White)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: red hair again?
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:53:03 GMT

sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Sara's ElectroPostie) writes:


>Oooh, did somebody say **strawberry blonde**???  <swoon>  I definitely
>want in on whichever of the orgies it is that Ellen's going to be at,
>and I want in on it *now*!!!  *Thank* you for sharing that with us, Peg

Is strawberry blonde kinda like blond streaked reddish golden hair?  Cos
thats me <and yes there are days I`d sell my grannys soul for a flirt>.
<shy bashful smile, fluttering eyelids, toe nibbles, soft whippings .........>

Iseult.
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 16:04:31 EDT
From: ebt-inc!pks@uunet.UU.NET (Pearl Stark)
Message-Id: <9204082004.AA06443@ebt-inc>
Subject: Re: Coming out to teachers...
-> also try the library at SUNY Purchase (15 mins from where I live) as they
    -> also carry a lot of publications and have a *LARGE* queer student body so

strange, I have a friend at SUNY Purchase and _she_ doesn't have a very
large queer student body. ;)
oh well, maybe I just know the wrong people.

pearl
From: kdc5072@cs.rit.edu (Kevin D Colagio)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Welcome Wagon/Flirt Machine is now in Prouction!
Keywords: different definition
Date: 13 Apr 92 15:57:03 GMT
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY

YES!  It is TRUE!

Good old RIT has unofficially decided that I am in charge of the Automatic
E-flirt/Welcome Wagon Machine.  This is going to be the only machine of it's
kind in known existance!

All input is greatly appreciated and will be credited to the doner.  All help,
in the form of money, goods or services <grin> will also be accepted.  Hints,
help an other non-material items will be collected.  Massages given daily (by
yours truly!) to those who show up to help.

In the mean time...

*hug*
X kiss X
 SLURP!  U
         '
         ^--- a tongue if you couldn't guess 8*)

nibble, nibble
bi-te
YUM!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-  Kevin Colagio...student at large -  I am looking   - In Gods we trust,      =
=               aka                 =  for something  - All others pay cash.   -
-         KDC5072@cs.rit.edu        -   to put here.  -      -Vladimir Taltos  =
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary)
Subject: Re: Bi Quotes and Red Heads (among others)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 92 00:45:19 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA - aka Barnum & Bailey

rhiann@milton.u.washington.edu (Sandra Hereld) wrote...
>I didn't announce my demuffining,(because I felt embarrassed that it
>had taken me so long to learn how to post.  
Welcome to soc.bi!  We were running out of patience waiting for you
to learn how to post.  We knew you were out there!  But the wait was 
worth it.

>In a class yesterday we were warned about the dangers of "excessive
>collaboration", and I just love dangerous things...
You've come to the right place.

>Would you two *fine* ladies be interested in collaborating excessively
>with me...???
Ooo, Sandy, convince them to come to Seattle when I'll be up there.  
That is if you're willing to share...

Ellen
[Dark brown hair with a little bit of silver - no orange or red - sorry,
 dark brown eyes too.] 

--
 Patricia "Ellen" Clary              |    "There's a lot to be said for
 pclary@polyslo.csc.CalPoly.EDU      |    an experience that's primitive."
 pclary@nike.CalPoly.EDU             |                        Riker (ST:TNG)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: ro@panix.com (r l reid)
Subject: Re: Top 25 News Submitters by User by number of articles for the last 2 weeks
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 16:16:43 GMT
Organization: Playdoh's Republic

In article <1992Apr10.112430.13118@cs.tcd.ie> cjmchale@cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:
>In <1992Apr09.203701.11078@robobar.co.uk>
>gtoal@robobar.co.uk (Graham Toal) writes:
>
>Graham, I didn't know you were on bit.listserv.words-l. Of course, I
>think it's totally disgusting; have you considered therapy? :-)
>
Now Ciaran, lets be Liberal about this (in the USAian sense).  It
is really none of our business if Graham and other consenting
adults want to do that words-l thing.  Of course I'm talking
about the ones who have the good sense to keep it behind their own
doors and not to be words-ling out in the streets where everyone can
see their lifestyle.  You know, most people have experimented
with words-l, and most outgrow it, but that doesn't give us
any right to discriminate against those who don't, they can't
help it they were born that way.  It even happens in nature.

-- 
		r l reid	ro@@panix.com
@WOOF, QUACK AND  MEOW: Composers of Woof present a variety of computer music 
[Apr 26, 8:30 pm, Cunningham Dance Studio 55 Bethune (Westbeth), NYC)]
[Apr 30, 8:30 pm, SIA, (410 W 118 St, top floor, NYC)]
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: rivk@quads.uchicago.edu (nora gayle rivkis)
Subject: Re: too perverse? (was Re: I am Muffin! I am INVINCIBLE!)
Reply-To: rivk@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 21:40:41 GMT

In article <1992Apr08.190100.29272@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
>rivk@midway.uchicago.edu wrote...
>>In article <1992Apr08.011556.14554@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
>>>the celebration may commence!
>>>Welcome to soc.bi kate!
>>>There will be an April ex-muffin initiation.  But we haven't 
>>>worked out all the details yet <grin>.  Any suggestions gang?
>>
>>Am I invited, or did I demuffin too early?
>
>Absolutely!  March folk have the option of being on either
>the giving or receiving end (or both if you wish <grin>).

Hmmm! I'm glad you said that last... I don't know if I could make up
my mind...

>Ellen

	-Nora
-- 
Oseh shalom b'imromav, hu ya'aseh shalom aleinu v'al kol yisrael.
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Sara's ElectroPostie)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: bisexuality a fad? (was Re: Bisexuality and Furries...)
Date: 10 Apr 92 21:19:40 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

orc@vpnet.chi.il.us (david parsons) writes:
>   Long hair is a killer, though, on a good-looking man, when he's
>also wearing jeans and a jacket. It helps if he's a redhead, too (lapse
>into drooling...)

Oooh, long haired men, mmm, what can I say?  Red, blonde, brown, black,
I'm no fussed ...

<joins David in a good ol drool>

Sara
-- 
 >{8-)  Sara Hopkins  (-8}<                      ______             ^
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St.   \  / / Glorious OOO
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662   \/\/   Stereo  ++  
 >  sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk  < < Six of one, half a dozen of the other >
From: woodhous@latcs2.lat.oz.au (Joe P Woodhouse)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Bi Quotes and Red Heads
Date: 11 Apr 92 09:26:17 GMT
Organization: Comp Sci, La Trobe Uni, Australia

In article <19961@castle.ed.ac.uk> gtoal@castle.ed.ac.uk (Graham Toal) writes:
>In article <1992Apr8.230811.6164@u.washington.edu> rhiann@milton.u.washington.edu (Sandra Hereld) writes:
>>I would like to, at this time make a one time only bargain offer,
>>2 flirts for the price of three to the entire group: and guys,
>>be not shy, we can't have the girls (*major smileys*) doing all
>>of the work...
>
>What a lovely smile you have :-]  Actually, I've been laying low and
>letting the girls welcome the other girls because 1) I'm trying not
>to be a typical butch male and butting in first all the time before
>the women get a chance to speak and 2) I think that having recently
>demuffed, it's more satisfying/valuable/enjoyable to flirt with MOTSS,
>probably for the first time for many of us...

   Graham, I'm really glad you posted that. I'd been getting a little sad,
thinking "no-one seems to want to flirt with me...". The wiser more sensible
self said that
 (i) most people would be wanting to flirt with MOTSS, and
(ii) most of the flirters are female,
so it's not really surprising...but who listens to wiser sensible selves
when you're feeling a bit down?

   I think I'm a bit extra sensitive at the moment, because the recent push
by my SO & I to get LaTrobe's GL Society to embrace Bi issues has generated
the most amazingly heated and nasty statements. I don't think I've ever had
so many people all yelling at me at once. It's wierd, one meeting everyone
seems happy to include Bi's, the next, Bi supporters are almost a minority.
I've never liked not being liked, and this is "not being liked" in spades.


>But have a good old-fashioned MOTOS hug anyway :-)
>
>*HuG*

   Can I second that? I still like old-fashioned MOTOS hugs too...
--
  / Joe Woodhouse        / I'm just a sweet bisexual...   / Hello, there.
 / Latrobe University   /    (think - Rocky Horror)      / Threesomes are fun.
/ Melbourne, Australia / Music. Magic. Mathematics. Me. / I like cats & ropes.
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: pwiebe@ecst.csuchico.edu (stephanie mandell)
Subject: Re: e-flirts
Organization: California State University, Chico
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:20:07 GMT

In article <20206@castle.ed.ac.uk> sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (S Hopkins) writes:

>Shy, huh?  Hmmm ... and I'm tee-total ... and celibate ...
>
>Sara

So, Sara, looks to me like you're knocking celibacy.  

I wouldn't call it a desired state of mind but sometimes it's the
right one.

Steph
From: pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?))
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Stereotypes and bisexuality (wasRe: Coming out to teachers...)
Date: 9 Apr 92 15:56:29 GMT
Reply-To: pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

i went through this when i married, too, although the only bi female
i knew at the time was fine with it, and all the other bis i knew were
ok with it (guys).  i only gotthis from lesbians.  sigh.  

>What if I decided to have a long term relationship with a woman?
>Would I not be a real bi then?  I don't hear that sentiment usually.
>What's the difference?  

you wouldn't hear it, but it would still be there.  believe me.  then
they would think you were a lesbian in denial.  many lesbians are 
*very* uncomfortable with women who continue to identify as bi even 
though they're in a long term motss relationship.  

>The stereotypes are rediculous.  How many times do I hear that being
>bisexual means you MUST have a partner of each sex at the same time at
>all times?  I don't understand this.  Where did this come from?  

myths.  sigh.  

btw- welcome from alt.sex, amy!  is this your first post here?  (you
and i briefly corresponded about a year ago...)

peg
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?))
Subject: Re: bisexuality a fad? (was Re: Bisexuality and Furries...)
Reply-To: pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 00:16:53 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.010102.24161@polari.com> elf@polari.com writes:
about a class he's teaching... 
>   Pretty interesting; I've spent most of my time talking about my wife
>(mostly because we're dealing with female anatomy this week), but it'll
>be interesting when it comes relevant to reveal that I spent most of
>Saturday night collared and chained to the foot of DeWolf's bed. :-)

is there anyone besides me that found this mental imagery *intensely*
appealing, and is *very* jealous of dewolf?  
;)  

peg
-who is mopping the drool off her keyboard-

Xref: sparky soc.bi:4289 soc.motss:19741
From: binetter@sdf.lonestar.org (Ben Cole)
Subject: Oh, hi, bi the way!
Summary: Well, the knife came out clean, so I must be done.
Organization: sdf Public Access UNIX, Dallas--unrestricted free shell access
Distribution: soc.bi
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 05:10:08 GMT

While I'm posting for the group, I'd like to personally say hello,
and thanks for all the interesting discussions..

(Sigh...why is it none of you live near Dallas?  On second thought,
don't answer that, can't say as I blame you. :)  )

Onward and Bedward....

Ben
From: chris@unicorn.resun.com (Chris Von Hendy)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: A Question- "Muffin"? "De-muffining"?
Date: 9 Apr 92 17:27:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: unicorn.01010066.0jj5dj
Reply-To: chris@unicorn.resun.com
Organization: Metalogic, S.a r.l.
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.5v3


In article <+93tjsh@rpi.edu> (soc.bi), monitn@jec316.its.rpi.edu (Nicholas Monitto) writes:
>   Hi folks! Just wondering... I've sat here reading the posts for a while, 
> and one thing has been eluding me. What exactly is a "muffin"? And what is 
> "de-muffining"? Just wondering... :)

Muffin:  What you were before you posted this question.

De-muffining:  What you did by posting this question.

To be precise, a muffin is a person who reads a newsgroup but does not
post anything. This term is reported to have started with the telephone
chat-lines for people who listened in on the conversations and did not
say anything.  You de-muffin by posting your first message to a
particular newsgroup, (this posting does not remove your muffin status
on any other newsgroups you may be reading.)  

One of the other terms I have seen used for people who do not post to a
newsgroup is Lurker.  Many people feel that Muffin has a much nicer
connotation.

By the way, welcome to soc.bi and prepare to be flirted with. ;-)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Von Hendy            "If we shadows have offended,
Escondido, California       Think but this, and all is mended,
ncr-sd!blkhole!chris  or    That you have but slumbered here,
chris@unicorn.resun.com     While these visions did appear." Puck
From: rhialto@falu.sneakernet (Olaf Seibert)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re:  "Sex-education" and homo-bi-sexuality.
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:21:11 GMT
Organization: Intravenous News Addicts

In article <1992Mar30.021347.26592@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> keb3@po.CWRU.Edu
(Keith E. Bitely) writes:
>It's kind of funny because I honestly think that my parents would be far more
>upset to find out I was an atheist than to find out I am bi.  I am bi but
>haven't come out to them yet.  And, I'm not an atheist.  Actually, even to me,
>the prospect of "losing my religion" seems far far more traumatic than me
>being gay or bi.

Well I was trying to keep religious issues out of here, since I've been
involved in discussions about it quite enough, and as usual, no-one changes
hir viewpoint, so they tend to get very boring. Fortunately this hasn't
happened here yet...

But to come to the point, there may be more connections between "coming
out" [*] as an atheist, and coming out as queer (used as a catch-all for
not straight), than I originally thought. This is because religion plays a
much more important role in society in the USA than it does in (northern)
Europe, or the Netherlands at least. There is absolutely no problem being
an atheist here; in fact it is quite reasonable to assume a younger person
is an atheist, until sie claims otherwise. (At least I always assume so). I
don't have the exact figures handy, but the time that over 50% of the
population claims not to belong to any church is quite near. And then you
need to realize that many people say they belong to a church even if they
don't actually practice regularly. As a small data point, of all the people
I know here in Nijmegen only one is religiously active. (And it doesn't
make him any less of a reasonable person, btw.)

[*] ``Come out as atheist'' sounds so horribly exaggerated, in my ears, but
I phrased it like that to make the parallels clearer.

But to really come to the point, it is just a matter of what people are
used to... not having a religion was "wrong" here as well, many years ago.
I don't know exactly why that changed, but I would assume that the same
principles would apply to getting more acceptance of queerness. It must be
documented somewhere... perhaps some research could dig up interesting
ideas. Getting more people "come out" certainly is part of it.

Not to mention the fact that it wouldn't hurt if people got less uptight
about religion, too! [hehe, I couldn't keep myself from saying that]

>Keithy
-Olaf.
--
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert      B4f+-t-w--g+k+(+)svmrp+  rhialto@cs.kun.nl
\X/ How can you be so stupid if you're identical to me? -Robert Silverberg
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 16:02:15 EDT
From: ebt-inc!pks@uunet.UU.NET (Pearl Stark)
Message-Id: <9204072002.AA02849@ebt-inc>
Subject: Re: Laws in the Isle of Man
-> >Well she was right, wasn't she?  I mean *obviously* you can't have sex
    -> >without sticking at least one penis into at least one orifice.
    -> 
    -> There wasn't a smiley, so I don't know if you're using sarcasm or not.  But,
    -> I definitely do not believe that the above is true.

If you need a smiley to see sarcasm, you're in for a hard time.  besides I 
would take the next statement along with the last as a clue. 
not that I'm not glad to know I have your support. ;)

    -> >Besides, surely both women couldn't lie back and think of England at
    -> >the same time, or nothing would happen.
    -> >Eamonn
    -> 
    -> Keithy

pearl
From: pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?))
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: serious flirtations!  ;) (Re: too perverse?)
Date: 7 Apr 92 10:21:00 GMT
Reply-To: pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <1992Apr6.010117.24231@polari.com> elf@polari.com writes:
>In article <1992Apr3.210615.25560@midway.uchicago.edu>
>     peg writes:
>>perhaps i should retire/resign and turn my title of ministrix
>>of flirtation over to you?
>
>   Retire?  No, please!  It would make soc.bi a more dull and unlovely
>place, m'lady!  Besides, you seem to have more energy than I do!

okay, okay.  i couldn't give up soc.bi at this point anyway.  
i'm an addict!  ;) 

peg
-btw, elf, i notice that you are a _prisoner_ fan by your latest 
.sig.  (join the club!)  what does this say about your personaltiy, 
i wonder?  
;)  
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov ( Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: NELGBSA conference this last weekend
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center And Storm Door Company
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 19:30:48 GMT

gt1342a@prism.gatech.EDU (gt1342a ) writes:
>A couple of us from Georgia Tech drove up to Delaware (gasp) for
>the NELGBSA conference.  I was THRILLED to see so many bisexuals
>...
>I'm wondering if any bi folks who attended the conference read
>this group - I'd like to hear what they thought of it.  I'll 

My God, another Techwood resident.  Is Techwood the official bisexual dorm
down at gatech?
--scott
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: SILVERI@QUCDN.QueensU.CA (Silver Tiger)
Subject: Re: The Ex-Muffin List
Organization: non-evident
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 17:21:50 GMT

<taps microphone>  Is this thing on?
 
*phew*  I THINK I'm back folks.  Another VMS site I was posting from was
accepting my posts but bit-bucketing them before they hit the net from what I
can tell.
 
I have a new newsfeed, and a much faster one.  *smile*  The News-admin for
this system knows I appreciate it, and also knows I owe him a few coffees some
day. :)  (Maybe even some bbq-ripple ice cream?)  *grin*
 
Anyhow:
 
Elf:  I read your posting on orgies.  I agree... Sex with folk I do not know
is not only difficult, and annoying, it's damned near impossible for me.
Thank you for sharing that with us.  *hug*
 
Scott:  So Beef eaters taste different eh?  *toothy grin*  Well, I seem to
be the prime example of carnivore, so do your findings hold up where I'm
concerned?
 
And that's it... I'll just pretend I'm caught up and use the 'mark to here'
function.  *shhhh*
--
|  ..        Ian Silver / Silver Tiger (AgTiger) / Argentium        ..
| .OO.                   SILVERI@QUCDN.QueensU.CA                  .OO.
| O/\O                B6 f t+ g(+) k+(+) s+(+)v m p                O/\O
|  --        These are my two wives, and this is my husband.        --
From: max@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu (Max Handelsman: liberal hippie subversive dude.)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: good places to not fit in
Date: 16 Apr 92 02:09:17 GMT
Organization: The Loonie Bin

In article <1992Apr16.003555.3401@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, ptd2@po.CWRU.Edu (Palmer T. Davis) writes:
> 
>>Anyway it's nice to know there are some brown hair hunters out there,
>>I'm multi-hairial meself tho, so watch out **all of you**, Sara's
>>hunting you ...
>>
	I'M HERE, I'M QUEER...
	and I've got brown hair!
	(halfway down my shoulderblades, no less!)
	Oooooo, the thrill of the chase! ;9

	I agree, it's usually the length of the hair rather than the color, 
although stubble-headedness can be interesting...esp. on Sinead!