HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble)
Subject: Re: Unforgiven (was Re: sex in movies) [mild spoiler]
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 16:16:08 GMT
Organization: Sporadic and incomplete
Distribution: usa

[Spoiler follows:]

buccb@after.math.uiuc.edu (Carlos Dragonslayer Butler) writes:

>> For those who haven't seen it, "Unforgiven" features scenes of rape,
>> slashings, torture, explicit sex, and violence. PLENTY of violence. 
>
> Glad you told me. Now I know not to go see it. I wish I could have
> gotten some inkling of the violence from the hype. 

You didn't get an inkling of the violence from the hype because there's
virtually no graphic violence in the movie.  There's implied violence,
sure -- it's a western.  People are injured; people die.  But none of it
happens onscreen . . . they could run the thing on network TV without
cutting a frame.

--
Lazlo (lazlo@triton.unm.edu)

"Miracles will happen as we dream"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: lewis@linac.fnal.gov (June Cummins Lewis)
Subject: Re: Mackenzie Bros. == Waynes World?
Organization: Fermiland, Batavia, IL
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 15:27:14 GMT

In article <ksZ5PB4w164w@kryton.UUCP> ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead) writes:
>maureenw@sco.COM (Maureen Wilkes) writes:
>
>> In article <1992Aug20.121748.885@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu> bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohi
>> >
>> >I haven't seen Waynes World but everything I hear makes it sound like a 
>> >Mackenzie Brothers ripoff. Has anyone who's seen both noticed this?
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> Wayne and Garth are to Suburban Southern Ontario as Bob and Doug are to
>> Northern Ontario.
>
>Southern Ontario??  Aren't they from Aurora, Illinois??  Maybe I just didn't
>get your joke.  On the other hand, they seemed to speak and act more like

I think the comment was referring to where Mike Myers is from, which I
know is Canada, and I assume is Southern Ontario.

>Bill and Ted, with the surfer accents.  Or maybe sort of a combination of
>Bill and Ted, and Bob and Doug.  Well, not being from the Midwest, I can't
>say how close they were to Midwest speech.

Well, being from southern California and currently living in Aurora,
IL (don't ask), here's my take on Wayne and Garth.  They are supposed
to be midwestern boys emulating Bill and Ted, whose model is the Sean
Penn character in _Fast Times at Ridgemont High_ (Spiccoli?).  And of
course the Penn character was a satire, too, although not that
farfetched.  So Wayne and Garth are parodies of parodies of parodies.
I haven't met many teenage boys like them here in Aurora, but I can
tell you that these two are EXACTLY like some guys I went to high
school with in San Diego around 10 years ago (which is when Myers was
in high school, I think).  So on some level, they are not parodies at
all.  I think Wayne and Garth are very good examples of how certain 
cultural stereotypes infliltrate society to such an extent that the
irony is buried, and the parody becomes the real.  Which doesn't mean
they are not funny!
  
June





-- 
"Saying that men talk about baseball in	order to avoid talking about their
feelings is the same as saying that women talk about their feelings in order
to avoid talking about baseball."
			--Deborah Tannen, author of _You Just Don't Understand_
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:26553 alt.cult-movies:7363
From: gremlin@buhub.bradley.edu (Stephanie Udry)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 2 Sep 92 16:32:59 GMT
Article-I.D.: bradley.1992Sep2.163259.27909
Organization: Bradley University


i'd have to say the last star trek movie made me ill....but i couldn't walk out
because i wasn't the one who drove!  

we also happened to be sitting in frotn of the bradley university trekkie
group at the time...blargh!

batman returns was even worse...once more a case of not being able to walk out
since it wasn't my car


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ Stephanie Udry                tanha on IRC                        ~
~ gremlin@buhub.bradley.edu     I am THE GODDESS-- worship at will  ~
~   "The innocence of sleeping children, dressed in white and slowly~
~    dreaming, stops all time."    "primary" by the cure            ~ 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: jxxl@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Film with the fe/malest cast
Date: 28 Aug 92 22:20:30 GMT
Reply-To: jxxl@cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke)
Organization: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA

boebert@sctc.com (Earl Boebert) writes:

> I believe that the only female image in _Lawrence of Arabia_ is a
> pinup picture briefly seen in the attack on Aquaba.

There are hundreds of women wailing from the hilltops as Lawrence
leads the Arabs off to one of their slaughter-fests.

John
From: map@ccrwest.UUCP (Mark Prysant)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Sneakers and an Oscar-laden cast
Date: 28 Aug 92 19:58:53 GMT
Organization: IDA Center for Communications Research

In article <BtpE88.8J@news.udel.edu> conrad@brahms.udel.edu (Jon Conrad) writes:
 >In article <591@ccrwest.UUCP> map@ccrwest.UUCP (Mark Prysant) writes:
 >
 >>And a wonderful cast: Redford, Sidney Poitier, Ben Kingsley,
 >>Mary McDonnell (sp?). All told, seven Oscar Nominees (I think)>
 >
 >It has one of the more impressive above-the-title lineups I can recall
 >in a movie:  The 7 names so featured are Robert Redford, Dan Aykroyd,
 >Ben Kingsley, River Phoenix, Mary McDonnell, Sidney Poitier, and David
 >Strathairn.  All but Strathairn (one of my very favorite actors for
 >years now -- what a kick to see him get this kind of exposure!) have
 >indeed been nominated for Oscars, and Redford, Kingsley, and Poitier
 >have won (though Redford won for directing, not acting).

The seventh nominee that I referred to is not mentioned in the print
or TV ads. His/her appearance is a little bit of a surprise during
the film.

Is there another film which has had as many or more actors who
were Oscar nominees at the time of the movies release?

And, what else has Strathairn appeared in? He didn't seem familiar.

Mark Prysant
(map@ccrwest.org)
From: em@merlin.cvs.rochester.edu (Ethan Montag)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: sex in movies
Date: 26 Aug 92 20:49:59 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Rochester, Rochester NY

In article <1992Aug26.195424.4530@asl.dl.nec.com> clee@aslws01.asl.dl.nec.com (Christina Lee) writes:
>
>does anyone out there think that the sex scenes in certain
>movies are getting too explicit and not really called for?
>A number of movies come to mind:
   [movie list deleted]
>
>It really hit home when I realized that a woman had brought in 
>a little girl (2-4 yrs old) to SWF.  
>
Don't blame the movies.  Few things piss me off more than parents
bringing small children to movies that are inappropriate for them.
If you can't get a babysitter, then don't go out.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: braca2@cspyr1.cs.adfa.oz.au (BRAY CHRISTOPHER)
Subject: Re: Buckaroo Banzai 
Organization: Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, Australia
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 02:58:30 GMT

ddebry@itchy.dsd.es.com (David DeBry) writes:

>	Maybe it's worth a mailing list... or an 'alt' group.  What
>the hell, let's have an RFD and CFV for
>rec.arts.movies.the.adventures.of.buckaroo.banzai.across.the.eigth.dimension!

 or
rec.arts.movies.why.wasnt.the.sequal.ever.made.to.buckaroo.banzai.[etc]
From: rob@chili.hnrc.tufts.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Truly Madly Deeply (spoiler)
Date: 27 Aug 92 19:51:38 GMT
Organization: USDA HNRC at Tufts University


In article <BD.92Aug27120837@fluent.UUCP>, bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby) writes:
> 
> nancyl@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (Nancy Lellenberg Bentrup) writes:
> 
>>Just rented Truly Madly Deeply last night and really liked it.  Would be 
>>interested in comments from others who have seen it. thanks.
> 

this movie got my goat.  was she thinking "Hmmm he does love me a lot, and
well, he did come back from the after-life to see me, but damn his friends
are rude, better dump him"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Ed McCreary)
Subject: Re: great voices
Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 19:44:41 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.140352.25712@ms.uky.edu> fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis) writes:
>   the story thus far:
>
>> James Earl Jones
>> Burt Lancaster
>> Jack Palance
>> Clu Gulager [????]
>> June Allison
>> Gregory Peck
>
>Jean Arthur : the best
>Candy Clark : "Do you think you can get us some broooooo?"

John Huston
Brad Dourif (especially in Exorcist III)
Eartha Kitt (purr!)


--
McCreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com     Computers are like Old Testament gods;
Me? Speak for Compaq?  Yeah, right.   lots of rules and no mercy.
"By this time my lungs were aching for air..."               Joseph Campbell
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Cast of Dracula
Date: 4 Sep 92 01:43:30 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <81960@bcsaic.boeing.com> vanover@bcsaic.boeing.com (Jann VanOver) writes:
>In article <1992Sep1.154305.1@dac.mdcbbs.com> asr_2@dac.mdcbbs.com writes:
>>
>>> Jonathan Harker: Keanu Reeves
>
>Jonathan Harker - you can't recall the character?  The character around
>whom the story revolves?  The man who is trapped in Dracula's castle,
>trying to escape throughout the whole first part of the book?  Fiance
>and, later, Husband of Mina - the MAIN female character?  The man who
>has the single GREATEST reason to see Dracula destroyed - if dracula
>lives, his wife becomes a vampire!
>
>I'm sorry - but You'll have to put up with Keanu throughout the WHOLE
>movie!  He IS the one who kills Dracula!  (Oddly enough, with a metal
>knife!)

Here's hoping FFC radically rewrites the story....
:-)



--
Sweet Thames, run softly till I end my song
Sweet Thames, run softly, for I speak not loud or long.
			-- T.S. Eliot, "The Wasteland"
From: bew@brahms.udel.edu (Ben Williams)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Film with the least actors
Date: 27 Aug 92 22:13:41 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

In article <9yH7PB2w164w@cybernet.cse.fau.edu> dascoser.bbs@cybernet.cse.fau.edu writes:
; I was just trying to think about which film had the least number of 
; actors.
; Can anyone think of a film with less (Nature films, cartoons, 
; documentarys and film of that sort don't count.
; 
; Dascoser


Closet Land starred Alan Rickman and Madeleine Stowe.

There are probably a hundred films that have less than 12 actors.

Take Hitchcock's Lifeboat, for example.  Or Penn's The Miracle Worker.
Also, have you seen Spielberg's DUEL?  This is practically a one-man show
starring Dennis Weaver.  Or how about My Dinner with Andre?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Williams
bew@brahms.udel.edu

               What we got here is a failure to communicate... 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
Subject: Re: Best shots wanted
Organization: Marriott Library, University of Utah
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 20:53:59 GMT

In article <66618@hydra.gatech.EDU> gt4476a@prism.gatech.EDU (Mike Alberghini) writes:


>     I would like some opinions of what people consider the best shots or
>sequences in movie history.  

The opening shot to Orson Welles "Touch of Evil" is one of the specific 
shots that movie historians like to point out as one of the most technically 
masterful and best ever done. 
	I personally think that the opening shot of Robert Altman's "The 
Player" is better. 


Jeff Jonsson
Marriott Library System Support, University of Utah.
==============================================================================
--"It's the sound of the secret--  jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
-- machinery at the center of  --  jjonsson@utahlib.bitnet
-- the world." -Cliff Steele   --  "You talkin' to me?"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: sex in movies
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 92 17:25:50 GMT

In article <1992Sep2.95028.26895@ms.uky.edu> fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis) writes:
>Explicit sexual scenes break down
>the aesthetic distance which the movie should have established.
>Take a realtive modest sex scene in the movie LA Story where Steve
>Martin simply holds the (clothed) breast of Sara Jessica Parker. That is
>a real hand holding a real breast. For a moment we are not watching
>a character in a story, we are watching two human beings with
>families, longings, histories etc. 

I suspect that this effect is very much a characteristic of the
watcher, more so than the film.  For instance, this scene in "L.A.
Story" did not affect me in the same way, at all.  I did not think
that suddenly I'd stopped watching the characters and started watching
the actors.  It seemed like a perfectly normal, human moment, to me.
I believe that our different reaction to this scene has a great deal
more to say about how the two of us view sex, than it does about 
the film itself.

>For a moment, the movie stops
>and reality intrudes. Real marriages have foundered upon the
>sexual conduct which actors and actresses have depicted for
>the screen.

Why is sexual conduct any different than other human activities,
in this regard?  Applying this standard, might not any scene of
a death be regarded as breaking the spell of a film, as certainly
death is a more traumatic experience in most people's lives than
sex is?  So are we to hide any deaths from the camera?  How about
a wedding?  That's pretty important and life-changing in the real
world, certainly more so than fondling a woman's breast.  Will the
depiction of this extremely important event cause viewers to step
outside the film and say, "wait a second, real lives have been changed
by the social conduct which actors and actresses have depicted
for the screen"?

The only reason sex is any different, in my opinion, has to do with
social taboos.  If we lived in a society that had taboos about eating
in public, rather than sexual taboos, this discussion would be about
how showing someone eat a peach on the screen caused the suspension of
disbelief to fail.  Since different people have different feelings about
what level of sexual depiction breaks a taboo, clearly opinions will
differ on the necessity and effect of sex scenes.

--
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: cooper@cos.com (Gary Cooper)
Subject: Re: Best War Movies?
Organization: Corporation for Open Systems
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 19:24:11 GMT

In <1992Aug10.141251.2795@ils.nwu.edu> wallis@aristotle.ils.nwu.edu (Mindy Wallis) writes:

>The question is: Is a good war film one that shows war in the truest light,
>one that shows the effects of war, or just a good film that
>happens to take place during war-time?  

The list I was looking for would be from the first option - although
many GREAT movies come from the other two (The three you mentioned,
Mrs. Miniver, Best Years of our Lives, The Duellists, etc.)

gary cooper (not the dead one)

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: What are those Negroes doing with guns?
Date: 4 Sep 92 17:02:52 GMT
Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU
Distribution: usa
Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH


gt7994a@prism.gatech.EDU (ORMOND,SEAN PATRICK) writes:

>BTW, if you really want
>to see a liberal media roll-call, look at the celebrities that gave him
>the money to finish.  I think Opera is on there, and she for one leans
>so far to the left, she can't even walk straight!

That's Oprah, fool.

>You see signs of this
>everywhere - hell, anyone voting for the socialist/democrats in November?

Not only a fool, but an ignorant one at that!  If you can't see
the difference between socialists and Democrats, then you know
little or nothing about _either_.

Try getting a political education from someone besides Rush Limbaugh.
-- 
   Brice Dowaliby, Fluent Inc., 10 Cavendish Court, Lebanon, NH  03766
                         bd%fluent@dartmouth.edu        
             I don't speak for them, they don't speak for me
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: the vanishing.
Keywords: remake?
Date: 3 Sep 92 20:48:02 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <3921@keele.keele.ac.uk> phd85@seq1.keele.ac.uk (D.H. Holden) writes:
>
> Hi,
>     I saw a film about a year ago called the vanishing
>     this was a belgium or danish film I think, but I've
>     heard that Hollywood is going to do a remake, any truth
>     in this, if so who's in it. It was a sound film.
>	   Dave.

Yes.  They've decided to keep the same director, so there's some hope
that we won't have a Typical Hollywood Ending (the Hero kills the
Villan in a fight in a secret temple by hurling him into a volcano
(with requiste volcano-burp effects from ILM) while recovering the
Magic Medallion that'll allow him to save the Heroine).  Kieffer
Sutherland (of "Julia Roberts...NOT!" fame) stars with Jeff Bridges, I
believe.  Dunno who plays the woman.

--
Sweet Thames, run softly till I end my song
Sweet Thames, run softly, for I speak not loud or long.
			-- T.S. Eliot, "The Wasteland"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: caruso@socrates.umd.edu (John Caruso)
Subject: Re: Best shots wanted
Organization: University of Maryland University College
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 22:11:57 GMT

In article <14528@mindlink.bc.ca> a481@mindlink.bc.ca (J.D. Frazer) writes:
>That's easy. I was never so moved than when I saw the opening sequence for
>_Terminator 2_.

     It was good, but IMHO what it came from was better: the dream sequence.
Everything came together there, direction, music, effects, and the result
was one of the most genuinely terrifying scenes I can remember.  I didn't
hear a single comment, sneeze, cough, or laugh during that sequence...the
audience's attention was riveted to the film.

     One of my other favorites is also from Cameron: the love scene in
Terminator.  Especially if you've already seen the film and know that
Reese has only a few hours to live, it's an incredibly poignant moment.
The music plays a major role in this scene as well.  And the continual
image of their hands clasped together, and then finally releasing at
the end, was perfect.

- John
From: mjhowe@swift.cs.tcd.ie
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Jurassic Park castings ??
Date: 3 Sep 92 11:31:16 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, Trinity College Dublin

 ... just something i heard last night ...

on "hollywood report", a programme on british television about film and
music news from the states: some of the cast for "jurassic park".

can anyone confirm or deny the following?

john hammond - sir richard attenborough
ellie (my guess) - laura dern
??? - sam neill

the 3 names were mentioned, but only the hammond character was described.
i'm guessing about ellie - seems to be the only female part available.

did everybody know all of this already?

jane.

-----------------------
mjhowe@cs.tcd.ie

Department of Computer Science
Trinity College Dublin
IRELAND

ph: +353-1-7021335
fx: +353-1-772204
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: mullignj@acfcluster.nyu.edu
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: New York University
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 16:49:56 GMT


The last movie I walked out of in the middle was U2's Rattle and Hum.

How pretentious and arrogant that film was!  It was truly appalling.

Highlander II was also incredibly stupid and dreadful.
From: boebert@sctc.com (Earl Boebert)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Film with the fe/malest cast
Date: 28 Aug 92 16:21:35 GMT
Organization: SCTC

charlie@uk.tele.nokia.fi (Charlie Brown) writes:

>A (doubtless nonPC) tangent to the `film with the fewest actors'
>question, is which films have the most predominantly male or female
>casts. 

I believe that the only female image in _Lawrence of Arabia_ is a
pinup picture briefly seen in the attack on Aquaba.

Earl
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: AH.PBL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Mark)
Subject: Re: sex in movies
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 19:34:05 GMT

In article <1992Aug28.183840.20156@asl.dl.nec.com>,
clee@ssdsun.asl.dl.nec.com (Christina Lee) writes:
>>Too explicit for what?  And not really called for, in what way?
>I don't thing having a woman bouncing up and down on a guy is called for.

  Eeeewww, yuck!  Me neither.  I'd *much* rather see a guy bouncing
  up and down on a guy.

>>Personally, I'd be more concerned with exposing kids to the violent
>>content of "Basic Instinct" or "Single White Female", than the sexual
>>content.
>I will agree with that, but I wouldn't say the violence it any better
>or any worse.  The sexual explicitness and the violence are both
>getting out of hand, in my opinoin.

  Then stay home.

>I do appriciate your feedback.

  Oh, don't mention it.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: buccb@after.math.uiuc.edu (Carlos Dragonslayer Butler)
Subject: Unforgiven (was Re: sex in movies)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 05:46:46 GMT

Steve Masticola writes 
> Me too. I was in "Unforgiven" last week, and sat behind a couple who
> had brought in two small (<= 8 years old) girls. For those who haven't
> seen it, "Unforgiven" features scenes of rape, slashings, torture,
> explicit sex, and violence. PLENTY of violence.

	Glad you told me. Now I know not to go see it. I wish
I could have gotten some inkling of the violence from the hype.

--
   		     Carlos Dragonslayer Butler
buccb@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu buccb@after.math.uiuc.edu buccb@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
        University of Illinois 	     (217) 373-4781 Pager
     "People often condescend what they fail to comprehend...
     ...ignorance makes life easier. Learn to tolerate. Peace."
From: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: the potion with the p
Date: 25 Aug 92 20:43:25 EST
Reply-To: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

MS>I while back there was a big discussion which I barely glanced at
MS>involving the line:
MS>"The potion with the poison is in the flagon with the dragon"

MS>Where then did this line originate?

     This line comes from the wonderful Danny Kaye swashbuckler "The
     Court Jester."  And the correct line is:

     The pellet with the poison's in the vessel with the pestle.
---
  SLMR 2.1a  Forget the virgins - we're OUT of virgins!
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten)
Subject: Re: Film with the fe/malest cast
Summary: .. ..... MEN
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 17:02:42 GMT

In article <l9slh0INNi6g@news.bbn.com>, levin@bbn.com (Joel B Levin) writes:
> charlie@uk.tele.nokia.fi (Charlie Brown) writes:
> 
> |A (doubtless nonPC) tangent to the `film with the fewest actors'
> |question, is which films have the most predominantly male or female
> |casts. Obviously any one wo/man films are kinda unbeatable, but what
> |about films with reasonably large casts ? 
> 
> Go back to the 30s and check out THE WOMEN, a four-star movie adapted
> from Clare Booth's play of the same name.  A large cast, set not in a
> prison or other strange environment but in mainstream (well, no, but
> New York high) society.  Not a man in the cast.
> 
> 	/JBL
> =
> Nets: levin@bbn.com  |  "There were sweetheart roses on Yancey Wilmerding's
> POTS: (617)873-3463  |  bureau that morning.  Wide-eyed and distraught, she
>               N1MNF  |  stood with all her faculties rooted to the floor."
>                      |					-- S. J. Perelman


What about "12 ANGRY MEN" 

marc colten