HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: robinr@prism.CS.ORST.EDU (ROBIN RYAN NEIL)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: BOXSCORE bos34nyk31.10jan93
Date: 24 Jan 93 03:35:59 GMT
Article-I.D.: flop.1jt2qvINNiju
Distribution: world
Organization: CS Dept, Oregon State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: prism.cs.orst.edu

bos 100, nyk 97   10jan93

technical fouls:
oakley 5:27 second
mchale 5:27 second
illegal defense:
bos 4:30 third

bos (17-17)      min  fgm fga 3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as pf st to bk tc ej ff  pts
abdelnaby,alaa    22   3   7   0  0   0  0   1  4   0  5  0  1  0  0  0  0    6
gamble,kevin      34   7  10   1  2   1  1   0  1   5  3  2  1  0  0  0  0   16
parish,robert     32   5  11   0  0   0  2   5 10   2  4  1  0  1  0  0  0   10
brown,dee         23   2   4   1  1   3  3   0  2   8  4  0  4  0  0  0  0    8
lewis,reggie      43  11  23   0  1   8  8   2 10   4  4  3  3  1  0  0  0   30
kleine,joe        15   1   5   0  0   0  0   2  3   0  2  0  0  0  0  0  0    2
douglas,sherman   25   5   6   0  0   1  2   0  3   4  2  0  2  0  0  0  0   11
mchale,kevin      27   4   9   0  0   2  2   1  5   2  4  1  3  1  1  0  0   10
mcdaniel,xavier   16   3   7   0  0   1  2   0  4   1  4  1  2  0  0  0  0    7
fox,rick           3   0   1   0  0   0  0   0  1   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0    0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bos totals       240  41  83   2  4  16 20  11 43  26 32  8 16  3  1  0  0  100
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .494   .500   .800       team rebs  5

nyk (19-12)      min  fgm fga 3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as pf st to bk tc ej ff  pts
oakley,charles    20   1   2   0  0   0  0   1  7   1  1  0  3  0  1  0  0    2
smith,charles     22   6  13   0  0   4  5   0  2   0  4  1  1  1  0  0  0   16
ewing,patrick     36   7  16   0  0   6 10   4 10   0  2  2  2  0  0  0  0   20
anthony,greg      21   2   5   0  0   1  1   1  1   3  2  0  2  1  0  0  0    5
blackman,rolando  28   5   9   1  2   1  2   1  2   7  0  1  1  1  0  0  0   12
mason,anthony     41   3   9   0  0   6  8   4  9   4  4  0  2  0  0  0  0   12
rivers,glenn      26   1   3   0  0   0  0   0  4   5  2  0  1  0  0  0  0    2
starks,john       37  10  20   1  4   7  7   2  5   4  5  2  0  1  0  0  0   28
williams,herb      2   0   2   0  0   0  0   0  2   0  0  0  2  0  0  0  0    0
davis,hubert       7   0   0   0  0   0  2   0  0   1  1  0  0  0  0  0  0    0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
nyk totals       240  35  79   2  6  25 35  13 42  25 21  6 14  4  1  0  0   97
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .443   .333   .714       team rebs 10

bos   26  26  30  18  -  100
nyk   25  16  23  33  -   97

attendance 19763, time 2:19, officials: JKersey,BAlexander,MCallahan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: jscott@micom.com (James Scott)
Subject: willie's back?
Organization: Micom Communications Corp.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:27:44 GMT

just read where the spurs activated willie.  can any spur fans out
there tell me if he's supposed to see any time against CHI sunday?

also, what's the status on sean.

on closer inspection, maybe that subject line should read "TC and
sean's back ... willie's feet."

james

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Floyd Goodrich)
Subject: Re: Barkley's big mouth
Organization: Motorola Inc., Austin Tx.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:36:33 GMT

In article <1jmia5INNnvr@news.aero.org> robert@aero.org (R. S. Statsinger) writes:
>>koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann) writes:
>|
>|>Remember when Parish
>|>punched Lambeir (or did he shove him into Rodman) - no T, no ejection,
>|>and no suspension.  AND...  it was all on film.  Explain that!?
>
>Hey, it's simply that the refs didnt have the guts to do it
>themselves.

The refs might not have seen it.  Remember they called a foul on the play, but
the foul was on another Celtic (Sichting?) and not on Parish.  If they
didn't see him do it, that explains why no T & no ejection.  He WAS later fined
and suspended for that incident.  Even though Laimbeer, who is a thug,
deserved it.  :-)

Floyd Goodrich
floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com
From: halpin@sw.stratus.com (Jim Halpin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Barkley's big mouth
Date: 21 Jan 1993 14:09:55 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: turkey.sw.stratus.com

In article <1993Jan20.232018.17868@ennews.eas.asu.edu>, koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann) writes:
> 
> Yea, but if they met them without their stars, would anyone care?  Or
> more important to the NBA, would anyone watch?  Remember when Parish
> punched Lambeir (or did he shove him into Rodman) - no T, no ejection,
> and no suspension.  AND...  it was all on film.  Explain that!?


	Parish did receive a 1-game suspension. He was forced to sit out the
following playoff game in Detroit.


-- 
!	Jim  Halpin
!	Stratus Computer
!	Marlboro, MA
!
!	halpin@turkey.sw.stratus.com

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: mittman1@athena.mit.edu (Christopher T Chiu)
Subject: A few more words about Barkley (Was Re: Barkley - the man)
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:46:59 GMT

Two more addendums to what Mike Geottsche wrote
about Charles Barkley, a.k.a. the Mouth of the South....

>He has the talent to do as much as Michael Jordan (Low
>post, perimeter game, slicing through the air, Magical passing,
>REBOUNDING (AHEM!), and instilling fire in his teammates), but then
>there is the x-factor for entertainment value above and beyond just
>playing.  He is without a doubt the most intense player in the NBA -- he
>will stop at nothing to win!

It is quite true that he is talented...however, as a player he does have
two major faults:
1. He is a poor free throw shooter(around .700)
2. He isn't a very good defender.

However, it is quite true that his intensity is such that
he can simply will his team to victory.  It must be said, however,
that often it is this very intensity that causes him to explode
at referees and opposing players.  He is an emotional stick of
dynamite...which sometimes explodes in his face.

Secondly,
>His record for signing autographs is impeccable -- he goes above and
>beyond the call of duty to please the fans.  It makes life hard on his
>teammates sometimes waiting for him to stop signing autographs so the
>bus can leave, but it's hard to argue with someone who loves the game so
>much, who has gotten so much from the game and is trying to give it
>back.  I've seen clips of him playing out on the courts with little
>kids, not his own, mind you, but those that adore and respect the big
>bald, awkward looking forward.  Can you imagine how that touches their
>lives?

Actually, it is interesting that you mention it, because he has often
written and said that professional athletes should not be role models.
In his view, since only a minute number of people become successful
athletes, youngsters should instead become professionals, period(lawyers,
doctors, and scientist, for example), since the chances of success
in those fields is much higher.  Toward this end, he has consistently
refused to take money for signing autographs.

Comments?  Comparisons with his colleagues?

From a curious student of basketball,
Genghis
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Subject: Re: Suns 121, Pistons 119
Followup-To: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Reply-To: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Organization: Arizona State University
Distribution: usa,local
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:21:01 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.160541.7483@gw.wmich.edu> 244lowry@gw.wmich.edu writes:
>>>
>> Majerle and Dumas
>> finally got seom good national exposure.  
>>   
>Thunder Dan, from Traverse City, MI
>and Central Michigan University
>  The guy is great.

And it's not "Thunder Majerle" like the idiot from TNT kept saying all
night.  If you're going to use a players nickname, use it right.  WHat
a bonehead.

>Isiah did a good job with KJ, and Laimbeer an excellent job with Barkely.
>It was those million or so three pointers and the fact that Detroit couldnt
>make a free throw.

I know, so why in God's green earth were they leaving guys wide open
on the 3pt line.  I mean they had all day to shoot the ball.  I'd heard
about this great Detroit defense and guys were just blowing off rotations.
Missing Rodman, sure - but that doesn't account for not rotating.  Also,
if I recall, Phx didn't shoot the lights out from the line either.  There
was one point they were shooting better from the field than from the line.
--
Harry Koehnemann			Arizona State University
koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu		Computer Science Department
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: paulg@microsoft.com (Paul Goode)
Subject: Re: willie's back?
Date: 24 Jan 93 22:15:46 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.
Summary: Spurs wounded

In article <1993Jan21.212744.15776@micom.com>, jscott@micom.com (James Scott) writes:
> just read where the spurs activated willie.  can any spur fans out
> there tell me if he's supposed to see any time against CHI sunday?
>

He doesn't expect to play until after the All-* break, at the
earliest. The Spurs had to fill a roster spot and elected to
activate Willie rather than bring in temporary help. (The spot
was opened by the release of William Bedford.)   

Interestingly, coach John Lucas discussed the various options
for filling the spot with veterans David Robinson, Sean Elliott,
and Dale Ellis. All three urged activating Anderson as opposed
to signing another player to a 10-day contract.

For his part, Anderson is looking forward to traveling with the
team and generally back into the flow of things.
 
> also, what's the status on sean.
>

He's playing again.   

> on closer inspection, maybe that subject line should read "TC and
> sean's back ... willie's feet."
>

NBC interviewed Terry Cummings during today's 103-99 home win over
Chicago. Cummings indicated that he could possibly play during
the post-season, but not before. 

Paul 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: cs225b26@dcl-nxt34.cso.uiuc.edu (cs225 student)
Subject: Re: How's this trade?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:04:46 GMT

In article <1k1olqINNdku@shelley.u.washington.edu>  
chris@milton.u.washington.edu (BelchMaster) writes:
> Doug Christi + Benoit Benjamin  for Sam Bowie + ???
> 
> yeah? yah?

I didn't know that the sole purpose of the Net organization was to help  
solidify the Sonic team while sinking back to the depths they just  
escaped.  Or am I the only one who doesn't get the urge to shoot myself in  
the foot?

**************************************************************************

Doug Adonis
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Subject: Re: Minkoff Player Rankings
Followup-To: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Reply-To: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:22:38 GMT

(Tony Minkoff) writes:

>63.	majerle, dan
There's your first flaw.  The best player in the NBA is ranked only #63ed.

>162.	miller,oliver
>163.	johnson,kevin
I can also tell you from the Suns standpooint, KJ is a little more
valuable to the team than Oliver Miller.

All in all, I think it's interesting to see how effective it is to
try and quantify players abilities.  Can stats alone provide an
accurate picture of player abilities or contributions?  Do we 
collect the right stats?  Personally, I don't think it can be
done.  But, I still enjoy looking at this stuff.

It will be interesting to see how this years all-star team members
rank on this list (keeping in mind, of course, that the fans only
get to vote for the first 5).  How good of a predictor is it.
--
Harry Koehnemann			Arizona State University
koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu		Computer Science Department
From: tketchum@oregon.uoregon.edu (Tim T Ketchum)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: BOXSCORE sea34por34.17jan93 Portland 109 Seattle 97
Date: 21 Jan 93 16:27:27 GMT
Followup-To: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Oregon
NNTP-Posting-Host: tketchum.uoregon.edu

In article <1jlgtaINNg7q@shelley.u.washington.edu>,
neuharth@shelley.u.washington.edu (John Neuharth) wrote:
> 
> In article <1993Jan20.213441.1926@tc.fluke.COM> mark@tc.fluke.COM (Mark D. Nagel) writes:
> >In <{y#@byu.edu> jhak@sofya.math.byu.edu (Justin Hakanson) writes:
> >
> >>This second T on Kersey was a terrible call!  Kersey and Kemp hustled down
> >
> >Being a Sonics fan even I have to agree on this one. I thought that there
> >might have been a foul on the original reach-in by Kersey, but he didn't
> >intentionally drop Kemp to the floor. I don't think that the game could
> >have been more poorly officiated. Call the real fouls instead of constantly
> >calling make-up fouls!
> >-- 
> 
> You're right on...It should have been a foul on Kersey, but the technical
> was garbage...But, what to do?  Actually, the ejection seemed to spark the
> Blazers, and I think they went on a run after that...Anyone know the score
> at that point in the game?
> 
> -John
> 
> neuharth@u.washington.edu

Well _maybe_ a foul on Kersey (I live south of the Columbia after all :-)
).  The Sonics were down 3.  Unfortunately, EJ (or was it Pierce?) missed
the T,  and after the jump ball (Kemp vs Strickland!) Barros was fouled and
missed both his FTs.  Sonics came away with nothing and the Blazers went
wild.   (of course soon thereafter the Sonics were on the wrong side of a
bunch of makeup technicals and the rest is history)

Tim
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: gfowler@javelin.sim.es.com (Gary Fowler)
Subject: Re: Barkley - the man
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:52:48 GMT

"Michael D. Goettsche" <mg5c+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

>Charles Barkley - the man, the myth, the cult figure.  What a beast!

stuff deleted...

>There you have him.  He is at once a plethora of characters.  Charles
>the Jester.  Charles the Competitor.  Charles the Superstar.  Charles
>the Compassionate.  Charles the Rousers.  Charles the Great.  He asks
>only for your respect, that you will never underestimate him.  Needless
>to say, for the majority of people, he has all the respect in the world.
>God bless you, Charles.

>DA FLAV

Maybe they will make an exception and canonize him before his demise.  He right
up there with Mother Teresa.
From: dodd@OES.ORST.EDU (Stirling S. Dodd)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: BLAZER SEX SCANDEL
Date: 27 Jan 1993 14:56:00 GMT
Organization: I'm not very Organized.
NNTP-Posting-Host: oes.orst.edu

Attached to an article in Clari.sports.basketball.pro on the Blazer
defeat of the warriors was this little tidbit:

  Portland's victory was overshadowed by reports that several Trail
Blazers were implicated in a sex scandal involving three teenage girls
in an incident that allegedly occurred Saturday night in Salt Lake City.
        The girls mentioned nobody by their last name. However, the names
Clyde, Terry, Cliff, Jerome and Tracy were listed in the police report.
Clyde Drexler, Terry Porter, Cliff Robinson, Jerome Kersey and Tracy
Murray all denied any involvement in the incident.
        After the game, Drexler said the charges were ``totally absurd.'' He
had hinted earlier that a lawsuit might be forthcoming.
        The under-age girls were runaways and apparently had been picked up
for shoplifting shortly before telling police their stories.

This is as clear a report as I have seen yet it still remains to
see what happens next. As someone else said, it is unlikely
to result in anything really bad as the girls stories are 
changing rapidly. So far I have heard that they were 16, 16, and 15, and
supposedly only one of the 16 year olds claims to have had sex. She told
police she was raped, but her father says she told him that it was consensual.
The most likely charges would be for giving the girls alcohol.

Wait and see I guess.


-- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
S Dod^2  |   "Do what you do but know why you're doing it"---GBH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Xref: sparky rec.sport.basketball.pro:24017 pdx.sports:93
From: russ@xylogics.com (Russel M. Lamoreaux)
Subject: Re: left handed teams
Organization: xylogics.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 16:01:47 GMT



RE: rudwick@rock.pkg.mcc.com (Tom Rudwick)

>Except that the David (Robinson) of today would have destroyed Bill Russell
>in his prime. Wilt too. They were great back then, but times have changed.


Times have changed...  If they called the lane voilations (3 seconds) during
the Russell era like they do today he could have averaged 50 or 60 a game!!!


  --------------------------------------------------------------------
  Russ Lamoreaux                                     russ@Xylogics.COM
  Xylogics, Inc.
  53 Third Ave.                                   (617) 272-8140 x-253
  Burlington, Ma.
  ----------01803-----------------------------------------------------












-- 
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
  Russ Lamoreaux                                     russ@Xylogics.COM
  Xylogics, Inc.                                  
  53 Third Ave.                                   (617) 272-8140 x-253
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: bis@world.std.com (Bis)
Subject: Re: Barkley's big mouth
Organization: Bis Information Services
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 04:38:00 GMT

In article <1jfp0lINNs1g@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu> operbwt@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu writes:
>In article <1993Jan19.004531.28342@henson.cc.wwu.edu>  
>> grow up? I'm interested in how Phoenix fans feel about him. I'm sure they're
>> happy he's on their team, making it the winningest team in the NBA, but
>> do any of them really like this guy? It'll be interesting to see what kind

>I happen to like Sir Charles and I know of other people who do too.  Why?   
>Because he isn't a fake ass bastard like many other pro-ball players.

>Barkley has fans who like him for his ball playing ability, but he also has  
>fans who like the way he doesn't take any crap.  I like Barkley because he  
>shows what he is thinking and isn't afraid of a little controversy.

Not to mention that he's incredibly funny.  Charles Barkley is the
main reason I root for the Suns.  I started rooting for them the
moment they made the trade with Philadelphia.  Oh, I agree, it would
do him good to relax a bit, because he can't do much good sitting on
the bench, but generally whenever he "throws a tantrum", as some
people put it, he's right!  Personally I think officiating in the NBA
is catastrophic (with league-condoned pro-home team bias), and I don't
mind seeing a player who doesn't just sit there and shut up whenever a
ref makes an unconscionable call, cowering in fear of the almighty
whistle.  The worst thing is that in general, no matter how bad the
officiating, there is no recourse.  Personally I think the NBA should
use use instant replay to review calls (Don't anybody even bother to
say it would make the game to long.  I'm not an idiot.  There should
be a limit, I just don't want to get into details right now.), but
that's not going to happen, for the same reasons refs get away with
what they get away with right now.  Anyway, I enjoy seeing a player
who gives the refs hell when they deserve it.

Yes, Brian, Barkley has fans!  He's a great player, and he keeps
things interesting.  As half the players on the Dream Team said,
Charles is Charles.

>Go Celtics!
>Go Suns!

Ditto.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: cs225b26@dcl-nxt34.cso.uiuc.edu (cs225 student)
Subject: Re: Barkley - the man
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:33:37 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.133732.4918@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave  
Meeks) writes:
> In article <C1FA3v.91C@news.cso.uiuc.edu>  
cs225b26@dcl-nxt40.cso.uiuc.edu (cs225 student) writes:
> >In article <gfLlUTC00aw_IAOks_@andrew.cmu.edu>  writes:
> >
> >Your dissertation on Charles seems to leave out the fact that he will  
> >never be regarded as a legend of the game because of his antics.  I can  
> >see the record books now:
> >
> 
> Hmm...  Ty Cobb... one of the games biggest asses, and one of it's  
biggest
> legends...   
> 
> The main thing that seperates Charles and the rest is that he has not  
won a
> championship yet...

I'll give you the Championship thing, but Ty Cobb was a vanguard in his  
field.  Your analogy would apply more to Wilt Chamberlain than Barkley.

**************************************************************************
What do Bernard King and Bobby Hurley have in common?

- They both play an average of 30 games a year and whine alot
**************************************************************************
From the desk of.....

		Doug Adonis
From: gregs@eskimo.com (Greg Sumner)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Trade rumor: B.Benjamin/K.McHale
Summary: Seattle/Boston trade rumored on NBC
Date: 26 Jan 93 01:05:16 GMT
Organization: -> ESKIMO NORTH (206) For-Ever <-


The above trade rumor has been on the radio in Seattle today, apparently
started by somebody at NBC.  Anybody from Boston heard anything about this?


-- 
Gregory Sumner  *  gregs@eskimo.com
Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems, Inc.
Seattle, Wa.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Subject: Re: Pacific division dominates
Followup-To: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Reply-To: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 16:41:04 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.161449.7860@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
>
>INTER-DIVISIONAL RECORDS:
>                     Pacific   Central   Atlantic  Midwest   
>Pacific (107-61)     ----      25-24     30-18     52-19     
>Central (92-87)      24-25     ----      49-41     19-21     
>Atlantic (78-94)     18-30     41-49     ----      19-15     
>Midwest (55-90)      19-52     21-19     15-19     ----      

This is less meaningful in the middle of the season, since you don't
know who has played who.  But, I recall this same thing last year:

	1) Central has problems with the Midwest
	2) Pacific has problems with the Central
	3) Midwest has problems with the Pacific.

Really wierd, but I think the same trends existed last year (can you
confirm Gidi?).  From the looks of things, the Midwest would be a
lot better if they didn't play the Pacific (like ~.500 instead of
~.350 ) - the Pacific division owns the Midwest.
--
Harry Koehnemann			Arizona State University
koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu		Computer Science Department
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: holt@pi.enet.dec.com (Bill Holt)
Subject: Re: All-Star voting update, slam-d 3-pt contestants
Reply-To: holt@pi.enet.dec.com (Bill Holt)
Organization: Evans and Sutherland Computer Corporation
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:13:55 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.203105.4287@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>, ortcm@cbnewsm.cb.att.com
(thomas.mcguigan) writes:
|>
|>In other news, the competitors for the slam-dunk contest and the
|>three-point shootout were announced:
|>
|>Slam Dunk
|>
|>Cedric Ceballos (defending champion)
|>Shawn Kemp
|>Sean Elliot
|>Chris Jackson
|>
|>(hmm, all from the Western conference)
|>

I heard that David Benoit of the Jazz will also be participating in the 
slam-dunk contest, so add another Western Conference (and an All-
Star town homeboy) to the list.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro