HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: grabenst@umbc4.umbc.edu (Mr. Michael Grabenstein; ACS (GUEST))
Subject: Opps, should have been trouble with 4.1.1
Organization: Univ. of MD, Baltimore County
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 00:56:27 GMT

	My post a few articles ago should have had the subject
above, not trouble rebuilding kernal. Sorry, should have looked
before I sent.
	Summary is I am getting messages from ypuppdated on the 
console. I figure it is my syslog.conf, but am not sure. If some
one could e-mail me their syslog.conf to their SparcStation-2
running SunOS 4.1.1 (that would would have diskless clients
booting off it). I would much appreciate it. :-)
Thanks,
Later,
	Mike
	grabenst@umbc3.umbc.edu
	or mikeg@asylum.gsfc.nasa.gov
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
The universe -- The ultimate fractal. 
	--Personal theroy
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.dcom.sys.cisco
From: bray_eo@tamug.tamu.edu (Elliott O. Bray)
Subject: Re: Booting across a router
Organization: Texas A&M University at Galveston
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 04:02:59 GMT

In article <Bxvv4G.3xx@oryx.com> xcpgzm@oryx.com (Phil Meyer) writes:
>From: xcpgzm@oryx.com (Phil Meyer)
>Subject: Booting across a router
>Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 23:12:15 GMT
>We have a SUN 690 MP with six ethernet interfaces on it.  We intend to
>grow this system to serve about 200 SUN clients.  With our data
>requirements, we want to run no more than 16 clients per subnet.  This
>is assuming that the NC400 board is as good as a cisco (big
>assumption).  I am only assuming cisco because I like cisco, but am
>open to any good alternatives.  We use both cisco and NSC boxes for
>routing between sites, and to manage communications between differnt
>types of networks.
>
>Here is our dilemma.  We run diskles systems (all local disk is swap
>with tmpfs).  We like the simplicity of administration this gives us. 
>We may even consider beefing up to a SparcCenter 2000 by mid year, but
>this does not (yet) address the problem of shear ethernet bandwidth to
>200 clients.  I realize that even SUN itself has many clients per
>server.  What is the best way to do it?  If broadcasts are not passed
>by a router, then how do you boot through the cisco?
>If you open up the cisco to pass broadcasts, then doesn't every
>connected subnet see all broadcasts?
>
>Secondly, how do you provide maximum bandwidth to each client?  What
>is the best interface between the server and the router?  FDDI maybe?
>
>Thirdly, each of the subnets needs access to the Amdahl running UTS
>for our disk farm.  Does the cisco do SNA like the NSC?
>
>Too many choices...
>
>Inquiring minds want to know how you did it, or how you would do it
>if you could do it all over again.
>
>I will summarize.
>-- 
>+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
>| Phil Meyer - The consummate UNIX analyst/SA/NA 
>|+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
>|                                                 (only cuz I eat too much)
>|
>+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>=-+
We run BOOTP across a pair of ciscos. See   ip-helpers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: fwp@CC.MsState.Edu (Frank Peters)
Subject: Re: avoiding Solaris
Organization: Computing Center, Mississippi State University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 13:06:49 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.083114.14306@neptune.inf.ethz.ch> weingart@inf.ethz.ch says:
: 
: Yo Sun, how about providing that outdated 4.1.{2,3} source for free on the
: net?  Common, what have you got to loose?

Profits.
--
Frank Peters  -  UNIX Systems Programmer  -  Mississippi State University
Internet: fwp@CC.MsState.Edu  -  Phone: (601)325-7030  -  FAX: (601)325-8921
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: adh@cbnews.cb.att.com (andrew.d.hay)
Subject: Re: switch off display for ELC
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 11:51:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.200252.126@mvax.uakom.cs> elias@mvax.uakom.cs writes:
"Hi !
"
"I am looking for a program for ELC that would switch off the display
"after some time without touching keyboard.
"Can you help me please ?

/bin/screenblank.  RTFM!

-- 
		+--------------------------------------------------------------+
Andrew Hay	|	I am not an expert,				       |
a_d_hay@att.com	|			 but I play one on the Internet!       |
		+--------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: larry@shark.mitra.com (Larry Williamson)
Subject: Loadable scsi device drivers ??
Organization: Mitra Imaging Inc.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 14:36:42 GMT


Sun's loadable device drivers seem like a real nice thing.

Can this technique be used for a scsi driver, considering most scsi
drivers are called (xxprobe()) at boot time? 

-Larry
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: jwa@yog-sothoth.dcrt.nih.gov (James W. Adams)
Subject: Re: avoiding Solaris
Organization: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:36:05 GMT

In article <15549@auspex-gw.auspex.com> guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris) writes:
>The loss of the compiler isn't a reason for people to whine about SV vs.
>BSD; it's a reason to complain about the lack of a compiler.
>
>Is there any other significant part of "the useful UNIX applications
>environment" that you lose by going from SunOS 4.x to SunOS 5.x, and
>that can properly be blamed on SVR4?  (No comments from people who've
>never seen SVR4, and are just extrapolating based on earlier SV
>releases, please.)

There seem to be several "debates," then.  What I think underlies many
people's concerns (other than those who are just complaining about *any*
change) is the perceived threat of Sun (and some other vendors as well)
deciding to eliminate most of the traditional UNIX utilities and
functionality as "unnecessary" for shrink-wrap business applications,
and unbundling many of the drivers and support libraries which now come
with the system.

Whether or not one supports this as a logical business move, this would
destroy the traditional UNIX environment and leave a lot of technical
users scrambling for support.  This would represent a major departure
from the "UNIX philosophy" of providing a rich selection of modular
tools that can be combined to accomplish a variety of tasks.

--
        James W. Adams   --   NIH Scientific Computing Resource Center
        Building 12A, Room 1050              phone: (301) 402-3488
        National Institutes of Health        uucp: uunet!nih-csl!jwa
        Bethesda, MD 20892                   Internet: jwa@alw.nih.gov
From: elling@eng.auburn.edu (Richard Elling)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
Subject: Re: avoiding Solaris
Date: 20 Nov 92 16:12:07 GMT
Reply-To: elling@eng.auburn.edu
Organization: Auburn University Engineering

In article 722136024@yorku.ca, jwa@yog-sothoth.dcrt.nih.gov (James W. Adams) writes:
> There seem to be several "debates," then.  What I think underlies many
> people's concerns (other than those who are just complaining about *any*
> change) is the perceived threat of Sun (and some other vendors as well)
> deciding to eliminate most of the traditional UNIX utilities and
> functionality as "unnecessary" for shrink-wrap business applications,
> and unbundling many of the drivers and support libraries which now come
> with the system.

What I find odd about the [un]bundling in Solaris 2.0 is that some
unbundled Solaris 1.x products are in fact bundled in Solaris 2.0.
ASET and bits of Online Backup come to mind here.  It seems that the
real logic behind the decision to unbundle certain parts is based on
the target customer.  For instance many sites don't have C programmers
(they don't program or use Ada, FORTRAN, Cobol, etc.) so the decision
to unbundle the C compiler doesn't really affect them.  On the other
hand, parts like ASET and Online Backup are usable by everyone and are
to be (at least partially) bundled.

---
 Richard Elling                          Manager of Network Support
 Auburn University                       Engineering Administration
 richard.elling@eng.auburn.edu   KB4HB [44.100.0.72]  (205)844-2280
Xref: sparky comp.sys.sun.admin:8455 comp.unix.solaris:337 comp.sys.sun.hardware:5761
From: dlukas@fenway.bu.edu (David Lukas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.unix.solaris,comp.sys.sun.hardware
Subject: Re: Disturbing News about Printing Under Solaris 2.1
Date: 19 Nov 92 22:15:35 GMT
Reply-To: dlukas@fenway.bu.edu (David Lukas)
Followup-To: comp.sys.sun.admin
Organization: Boston University

This is a followup to the posts about not being able to use an
SBUS Sparc Printer card under Solaris 2.1, and therefore not on
a Sparc Classic.


A previous followup claimed that the SBUS card is not needed because the
Sparc Classic has a parallel port.  But the SparcPrinter package is
driven by a "video interface" which has a special device driver.
(The card has a parallel port as well, for hooking HP printers and
the like.)  In any case I don't think NeWSprint itself works under
Solaris 2.1 -- I know there is a compatibility mode but NeWSprint does
some funny things that might not work in compatibility mode.

My Sun rep tells me that the whole setup will be ported to Solaris 2.1
by March.

David
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: s5udtg@fnma.COM (Doug Griffiths)
Subject: Re: Another FTP question
Reply-To: s5udtg@fnma.COM
Organization: Fannie Mae
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:52:09 GMT

Haakon Styri writes:
>Is it possible to set up std. SunOS `in.ftpd' to disallow `root' from
>logging in? (I need access for other users, but cannot have root access
>over the net.)


easy.  Create an /etc/ftpusers file and add root as the entry.  This will disallow
root (or any other users name entered) ftp access.

---
                  
 | Doug Griffiths | Internet: dougg@fnma.com    | 11396 Links Drive   |
 | Fannie Mae	  | uunet: uunet!almserv!s5udtg | Reston, VA. 22090   |
 | Washington, DC |                             | USA                 |

Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: jwa@yog-sothoth.dcrt.nih.gov (James W. Adams)
Subject: Re: avoiding Solaris
Organization: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 16:15:33 GMT

In article <BxwsK4.6Ko@VOA.GOV> ck@VOA.GOV (Chris Kern) writes:
>In article <15540@auspex-gw.auspex.com> guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris) writes:
>>
>>Unfortunately, all too many people are going for general philosophical
>>whines about BSD vs. SV, rather than for specific complaints about the
>>fact that the OS is changing at all.
>
>Which is surprising to me *especially* when it comes from techies.
>I understand why, say, a casual MS-DOS user would be anxious about and
>disoriented by even a superficial change in the computing environment
>he is accustomed to.  I would have assumed, at least before seeing the
>high hysteria in this thread, that most techies would take such a
>change in stride.
>[...]

I think the key to this issue is that UNIX is more than an "operating
system."  It is really a "computing environment."  Most people I know
with concerns about the SunOS 4 -> SunOS 5 switch are not concerned with
niggling details of the kernel implementation (as others have pointed
out, SunOS 4 was a major contributor to SVR4 and is already a major
departure from 4.3BSD).

People like the present environment and don't want to change.  Worse,
many regard this as the start of a trend leading to loss of much of the
useful UNIX applications environment.  OS/2 comes with little in the way
of the applications environment of SunOS 4.1.x or 4.xBSD.  There is no
reason to believe that NT will be any different.  Business users don't
care so much about this because they primarily want to run shrink-wrap
apps.  The people who are upset are the ones who want to develop,
customize or at least extend the functionality of applications they use.
--
        James W. Adams   --   NIH Scientific Computing Resource Center
        Building 12A, Room 1050              phone: (301) 402-3488
        National Institutes of Health        uucp: uunet!nih-csl!jwa
        Bethesda, MD 20892                   Internet: jwa@alw.nih.gov
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: tim@fsg.com (Timothy Hunt)
Subject: NIS slow resolving unknown IP addresses
Summary: NIS is very slow resolving IP address not in hosts map
Keywords: NIS, yellow pages
Organization: Fusion Systems Group, Inc.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 22:27:49 GMT

Has anybody seen a problem with NIS being very slow to resolve
IP addresses not in the "hosts" map. For example when I do
a "netstat -r" it prints out about 1 line a minute when the
routing is to an unknown IP address. If "ypbind" is killed
or the IP address is added to the "hosts.byaddr" map the system
behaves as expected.

This particular configuration was using a SPARC 10 with SunOS 4.1.3
was not using DNS.

Thanks for any ideas

Tim Hunt
tim@fsg.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: elling@eng.auburn.edu (Richard Elling)
Subject: Re: Direct automounter map problem (involving m
Reply-To: elling@eng.auburn.edu
Organization: Auburn University Engineering
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 00:44:04 GMT

In article 9294@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov, earle@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Greg Earle - Gainfully Unemployed) writes:
>
> ....  Am I all wet to use direct maps?

yes.
I think it can be very easily demonstrated that direct automount maps
are more trouble then they are worth.  Long ago I converted all of
my direct maps to indirect and then left symlinks where needed.
e.g. /usr/local -> /vol/local  (soon to be /opt/local (?))
This has proven to be much more reliable and much easier to manage
since you don't have to restart the automounter every time you make
a change in the indirect maps.

In the old days many applications really expected to be put in one
spot, but now most can be located anywhere.  And I think this is a 
good thing.  So, you can reconfigure AnswerBook to think it lives 
in /opt/AnswerBook or anywhere else for that matter.

---
 Richard Elling                          Manager of Network Support
 Auburn University                       Engineering Administration
 richard.elling@eng.auburn.edu   KB4HB [44.100.0.72]  (205)844-2280

Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: mike@cd.com (Mike Heins)
Subject: Re: Loadable scsi device drivers ??
Organization: Central Data Corp., Champaign, IL
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 01:09:30 GMT

(Steinar Haug) writes:
>larry@shark.mitra.com (Larry Williamson) writes:
>> Sun's loadable device drivers seem like a real nice thing.
>>
>> Can this technique be used for a scsi driver, considering most scsi
>> drivers are called (xxprobe()) at boot time? 
>
>Sorry, the answer is no. In SunOS 4.1.x you cannot have loadable SCSI
>drivers. (Yes, it would have been nice...)  In Solaris 2.x, yes.
>

It is only theoretically impossible.  In practice, it can be done.  We
use it for our scsiTerminal Server driver.

But Sun doesn't support it.  One of our engineers reversed his
direction and figured out how to do it.  It has remained consistent
enough in implementation so as to work unchanged from 4.1 to 4.1.3.

Regards,
Mike Heins
------------------------
Central Data Corporation	"Makers of the scsiTerminal Server"
1602 Newton Drive		(800) 482-0315
Champaign, IL 61821		mike@cd.com   or  ..!uunet!cendata!mike
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: weingart@inf.ethz.ch (Tobias Weingartner)
Subject: Re: avoiding Solaris
Followup-To: comp.sys.sun.admin
Reply-To: weingart@inf.ethz.ch
Organization: ETH - Switzerland
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 08:31:14 GMT

In article <15549@auspex-gw.auspex.com>, guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris) writes:
|> >People like the present environment and don't want to change.  Worse,
|> >many regard this as the start of a trend leading to loss of much of the
|> >useful UNIX applications environment.
|> 
|> The loss of the compiler isn't a reason for people to whine about SV vs.
|> BSD; it's a reason to complain about the lack of a compiler.

Not a great loss...  The only thing that REALLY bugs me, is the way Sun is
using the FSF (gcc), to provide a compiler (Which happens to be better than
their own, at least at 4.1.x) for 'free'.

Yo Sun, how about providing that outdated 4.1.{2,3} source for free on the
net?  Common, what have you got to loose?

--Toby.

***************************************************************
* Tobias Weingartner  * Not every man is willing to die...    *                
* c/o Bruno Opprecht  * Some have to be PUSHED out the window *
* Oberdierikoner st.7 * ------------------------------------- *                
* 6030 Ebikon Luzern  *      ...This space for rent...        *
* SWITZERLAND         *      ...This space for rent...        *                
***************************************************************
* +41'041'33'25'40    * ..Midnight the fading, blue Wizrd..   *
***************************************************************
SYSTEM-F-ANARCHISM, the operating system has been overthrown                  

PGP2.0 Public Key available at 'finger weingart@tau.inf.ethz.ch'

Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: rhealey@digibd.com (Rob Healey)
Subject: Re: Solaris 2.x: resistance to it?
Organization: DigiBoard Incorporated, Eden Prairie, MN
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:58:26 GMT

In article <1dsjidINNcrv@cae.cad.gatech.edu> vincent@cad.gatech.edu (Vincent Fox) writes:
=I know that around Tech, we have had Solaris for some weeks now as part
=of the University ScholarPack. Talking to the lady who checks out
=the software, seems like no one is checking it out. I personally don't
=want to move to an OS that is that different and may break all my
=existing software. Not to mention a slight bias for Berzerkely.
=I am wondering if this is an instance of other folks feeling the
=same way and avoiding the upgrade?

	Your choice is System V period. Sun is the last vendor to go
	from a Solid BSD to System V, others did it long ago. POSIX
	and other standards are basically System V based, etc.

	Solaris is nice for many sute which have System V based systems
	as it's more consistant. For you BSD bigots out there System V
	outnumber's you massively in seats due to the fact that Xenix
	and SCO UNIX are used extensivly in turnkey apps sold to hundreds
	of businesses around the world yearly. Plain and simple the MONEY
	is in System V.

	The administration in SVR4 has been standardized, MUCH easier than
	the shell scripts that varied from BSD to BSD in the "good" old
	days.

	Sun made the correct BUSINESS move to go to SVR4 as that's where
	the big UNIX money is and always will be. Business uses outnumber
	technical/engineering by a great deal. Every business needs
	accounting, few need weather forcasting or CAD on their systems. By
	going with SVR4 Sun has made it easier to leverage the applications
	ported to Intel based SVR4 from the DOS world.

	Those who hate Solaris and SVR4 probably don't really understand
	the system. If they did they'd see how much mess SVR4 cleaned up
	over BSD in programming interface, system standards, administration
	and networking. SVR4 has all the functionality of BSD, it just
	doesn't use the exact same syntax.

	For those who will choose another platform, do you REALLY think
	moving to another major vendor will be EASY? That other vendor
	will probably be SVR3.2 based and have woefully little of the
	BSD fucntionality SVR4 has or the clean networking and programming
	interfaces of SVR4.

	I've been working on SVR4 systems, non-sun's, for almost 2 years
	now. Before that I worked and maintained Sun and other BSD systems.
	I can say without any hesitation that given a choice between 4.1.3
	and Solaris 2.1 I'll take Solaris 2.1 thank you, MUCH nicer system.

		-Rob
-- 

Rob Healey         MTS                      E-mail: rhealey@digibd.com
Digi International (DigiBoard)              Fax:    (612) 943-0803
Eden Prairie, MN   55344                    Phone:  (612) 943-9020
Xref: sparky comp.sys.sun.admin:8373 comp.unix.solaris:328
From: fjs@athena.lkg.dec.com (F. J. Shields)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.unix.solaris
Subject: Solaris 1.1 Bug: Multiple directories not allowed on LD_LIBRARY_PATH ?
Date: 16 Nov 92 19:21:46 GMT
Reply-To: fjs@athena.lkg.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


I'm running Solaris 1.1 (SunOS 4.1.3) on an SS10, and have had a problem
setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable. I want to be able to
have several directories on the path, and previous versions of SunOS
would let me do the following:

        setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/openwin/lib:/usr/local/lib

But with Solaris 1.1, I found that unless /usr/openwin/lib is the ONLY
directory on the path, starting up filemgr results in the message:

   dlopen: stub interception failed.

and a core dump. BTW, the documentation in the answerbook states that
LD_LIBRARY_PATH should be a "colon separated list" of pathnames. That
setenv line sure LOOKS like a "colon separated list", but what the
heck, maybe I can't read.

Then, just for yucks, I tried:

        setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH "/usr/local/lib /usr/openwin/lib"

Lo and Behold: it works! Did someone accidently change a ':' to ' ' in
the parser code? But that surely doesn't look like a "colon separated
list", now does it?

So the questions are: 
	What is the correct syntax for placing multiple directories on
	the library load path? 

	Is the documentation wrong, or is it the implementation? 

	Has anyone else run into this problem? 

	Is there a patch for this problem?

Thanks for any help you can give me.

--
F. Jay Shields
fjs@athena.lkg.dec.com
Digital Equipment Corporation
From: lees@cps.msu.edu (John Lees)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
Subject: Need OW Patch 100444-31 or later
Date: 20 Nov 92 22:14:46 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Michigan State University
Originator: lees@pixel.cps.msu.edu

We need OW patch 100444-31 or later. Using archie, the latest I have
been able to find is -28.

Thanks for the help. Please respond by email.
----------                                                     O
 John Lees, Pattern Recognition & Image Processing Laboratory OoO
 Systems Analyst & Lab Manager, Computer Science Department   /O  one
 A714 Wells Hall, MSU, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824-1027     |   world
 lees@pixel.cps.msu.edu, lees@msuegr.bitnet, CIS 74106,1324  (|)  one
   M i c h i g a n   S t a t e   U n i v e r s i t y         _|_  people
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: wisner@netcom.com (Bill Wisner)
Subject: Re: Disturbing News about Printing Under Solaris 2.1
Organization: Taos Mountain Software, Mountain View, CA
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 01:33:18 GMT

NeWSprint 2.0 (and 2.1) does not run under Solaris 2.

The Solaris 2 version of NeWSprint will be 2.5 and will supposedly
be released Q1 '93.

w. <wisner@netcom.com> Gryphon Gang Mountain View CA 94043
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: popelka@odysseus.uchicago.edu (Glenn Popelka)
Subject: core files in /var/spool/mail (4.1.2)
Organization: University of Chicago  LASR
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 13:08:29 GMT

 I know this isn't much to go on, but ever since we've upgraded
to 4.1.2, I've been finding core files in /var/spool/mail.

 The time of the latest one corresponds to a 'mass mailing' to
about 25 people on the machine. 

 This is about all I've got so far. Does this ring a bell with anyone?

odysseus% adb core
core file = core -- program ``in.comsat''
 - warning: bad magic number
data address not found

odysseus% dbx `which in.comsat`
warning: no symbols
program terminated by signal SEGV (no mapping at the fault address)


Thanks,

glenn 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin
From: jasonp@oslts0.Prime.COM (Jason Pascucci)
Subject: NIS and DNS
Organization: ComputerVision Services
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 09:21:35 GMT

I feel stupid. I know this worked at one point, and I even have 
a system which is doing this, but I can't discern the differences 
between that one, and the system which isn't...

Anyways...I want my ypserv to use NIS, and I can't for the
life of me recall how to do it. I skimmed the (old)
mans I have on it, and it's not helpful. Just supplying
-d doesn't seem to do anything. I even, through
some esoteric bit of backwater knowledge, tried 
ld ypserv -lresolv, but that didn't seem to do anything 
either. 

I know it's something stupid, but I can't figure it out. Help?

If it matters (it shouldn't) I'm running 4.1 on a Sun3. However,
I will be moving over to 4.1.3/Sparc2 when I get my new
server setup. 

Thanks,

--
Jason R. Pascucci
jasonp@primerd.prime.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.admin