HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: vds7789@aw2.fsl.ca.boeing.com (Vincent D. Skahan)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Any reommendations for MS-DOS uucp?
Date: 11 Sep 92 13:58:11 GMT
Organization: none

sizemorj@witness.hernix.org (James E. Sizemore Jr.) writes:
>In article <kevinf.716061977@infmx> kevinf@tofu.informix.com writes:
> > thigpen@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov (Keith Thigpen) writes:
> > 
> > >I'm looking for a good MS-DOS uucp package that I can run under windows.
> > 
> > >The most popular one (from my informal survey of net traffic) is FSUUCP.

there is no way FSUUCP is anything near the most popular one.
a few months ago, I did a check of the maps and there were something like
10 sites registered (in the maps) as running FSUUCP, 130 with UUPC/extended,
and >200 running Waffle.

Every once in a while I check my news history files and I come up with at
least 300 waffle sites posting things in the last 30 days to comp+news+sci
(no 'fun' groups, so the total is no doubt higher).

> > I use UUPC/Extended - shareware from Kendra Electronic Wonderworks.  I like
> > it alot.  It has mail and uucp; it'll talk to itself and to a *nix host
> > as well.  Source is included.
> > 
> > I havn't used any others but I`m real happy with UUPC/Extended.

yeah, I liked it too but the snews posting mechanism is kind'a hokey.

I took Waffle and hooked in snews as a threaded newsreader and it
worked great.

I've also used FSUUCP in various versions and it's getting there, but
personally I still like the reliability of Waffle or UUPC.

-- 
   ---------   Vince Skahan   -----------   vince@atc.boeing.com   ---------   
	I've finally realized that if you throw enough money and bodies
	at non-existant problems, that they really do appear...
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,biz.comp.telebit,comp.dcom.modems
From: gtoal@ibmpcug.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: FAX and BBS in the SAME line.
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 22:25:33 GMT

In article <1992Sep7.160445.25659@qiclab.scn.rain.com> 70465.203@compuserve.com writes:
CONNECT FAX" message (and having a FAX receive program that can
>be run *after* the connection is established).

The connect fax I can manage - the terminal login program I run could
easily start up a different program for this message (it already handles
ppp or uucp or user dial-ins) but *where* do you get a fax reception
program that *doesn't* sit waiting for the 'CONNECT FAX" message itself?

G
--
From: lamb@xtcn.com (Richard Lamb)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Wanted:  UUCP <--> MHS Software
Date: 14 Sep 92 16:25:54 GMT
Organization: XtcN Ltd

Contact Notework. They have had a UNIX-MHS gateway out for some time. Its 
not free but it may be worth you while to talk with them. 
Contact: crisley@notework.com

					Rick


-- 
XtcN Ltd, lamb@xtcn.com, Tel:508-655-2960, FAX:508-655-4559, Telex:6504829720
11 Roxbury Ave.,Natick MA 01760,4425 Butterworth Pl.N.W.,Washington D.C. 20016
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: g89s9112@hippo.ru.ac.za (Dirk Sturzebecher)
Subject: help getting started (FAQ ??)
Organization: Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
Distribution: global
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 10:20:17 GMT

Hi,
I will be leaving university at the end of this year. I do not want to
lose e-mail connection to internet. What does one need to start with.
What programs are in the public domain. How easy is it to get a host for
your uucp dial up ?

Any help wellcome

Cheers, Dirk

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dirk Sturzebecher				g89s9112@alpha.ru.ac.za
Rhodes University Grahamstown			South Africa
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: bt@irfu.se (Bo Thide')
Subject: Need PC UUCP supporting "uuto"/"uupick"
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 08:39:53 GMT
Organization: Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden

For some Russian colleageus I am looking for an UUCP package that runs
on their PC and that supportds "uuto"/"uupick".  Right now they use
UUPC and it works reasonably well but has no direct uuto/uupick support.

Please e-mail any pointers to me at bt@irfu.se.

Thanks,

Bo
-- 
   ^   Bo Thide'--------------------------------------------------------------
  |I|        Swedish Institute of Space Physics, S-755 91 Uppsala, Sweden
  |R|      Phone: (+46) 18-303671.  Fax: (+46) 18-403100.  IP: 130.238.30.23
 /|F|\          INTERNET: bt@irfu.se      UUCP: ...!mcvax!sunic!irfu!bt  
 ~~U~~ ----------------------------------------------------------------sm5dfw-
From: tmetro@ds5000.DAC.Northeastern.edu (Thomas Metro)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Upper level uucp
Date: 8 Sep 92 08:59:58 GMT
Organization: Northeastern University, Boston MA. USA 02115
cc: tmetro@ds5000.dac.northeastern.edu

From the file: UUCP Internals Frequently Asked Questions
Written by: ian@airs.com (Ian Lance Taylor)
> This article describes how the various UUCP protocols work, and
> discusses some other internal UUCP issues.  It does not describe how
> to configure UUCP, nor how to solve UUCP connection problems, nor how
> to deal with UUCP mail.  There are currently no FAQ postings on any
                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> of these topics, and I do not plan to write any.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is this still true? I have read all of the UUCP related FAQs that I have
seen posted to this group and I have learned a lot about the UUCP handshaking
and protocols, but I haven't seen anything discussing the upper level
operations. I'd like to know more about how files actually get passed through
the system, how the spool directory is used, and how mail and news is sent.
Any references?

Thanks,
 -Tom

tmetro@ds5000.dac.northeastern.edu


Xref: sparky comp.mail.uucp:1750 biz.comp.telebit:892 comp.dcom.modems:13035
From: d9mikael@dtek.chalmers.se (Mikael Wahlgren)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,biz.comp.telebit,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: FAX and BBS in the SAME line.
Date: 6 Sep 92 18:18:32 GMT
Organization: Chalmers University of Technology

In article <1992Sep6.070349.4499@dmc.com> munroe@dmc.com (Dick Munroe) writes:

>> 	Help!    Anyone know how to run a BBS and FAX machine using
>> the FAX/MODEM like PM14400FXSA or other FAX modems?

I am running a V.32" BBS and a FAX on the same line.  I just ensured that
the V.32" modem disconnects the FAX from the line, while off hook.  Then
I configured both fax and modem to answer at the same ring-signal count.
The modem was configured for a short connection timeout (about 15 seconds),
so if the modem fails to connect within 15 seconds, it will go on hook,
and thus pass through the line to the FAX machine.  The FAX machine has
been trying to connect for 15 seconds already (without having the line)
but now, gets control of the line, and continues to try to connect with
a fax for quite some time.

I haven't experienced any problems with this arrangement.  I had to configure
the modem with a special answer sequence to avoid it to confuse the fax
machine in the other end.

I don't know how to do if you ONLY have a fax-modem.

Mikael Wahlgren
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: thigpen@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov (Keith Thigpen)
Subject: Any reommendations for MS-DOS uucp?
Summary: Looking for godd MS-DOS uucp package
Keywords: MSDOS MS-DOS uucp
Organization: NASA/MSFC
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 14:48:44 GMT

Hi netters.

I'm looking for a good MS-DOS uucp package that I can run under windows.

The most popular one (from my informal survey of net traffic) is FSUUCP.
Are there any other strong contenders?

One of the guys here at work uses FSUUCP, but he uses 1.2 'cause apparently
1.3 doesn't run well in unattended mode. Is this correct? Is 1.3 fairly
clean? (bugwise).

Thanks in advance for the info. I'd like to get another PC up at home
and install Unix, but this seems to be the best interim solution.

Thanks again,
Keith



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Keith Thigpen          thigpen@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov      (205)461-4936   |
| New Technology, Inc.   Marshall Space Flight Center     Huntsville, AL   |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: s4uhkm@fnma.COM (Howie Michalski)
Subject: Re: UUNET and FIDONET Gateway
Reply-To: s4uhkm@fnma.COM
Organization: Fannie Mae
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 16:09:06 GMT

I am _SURE_ this will not be the only response to this post, but here's how
it works in a nutshell:

A user enters a message on a BBS destined for someone on the Internet.  I wont
go into the specifics of the addressing format other than to say that somewhere
in the address you will have specified the Fido node that is acting as that
system's USENET/FIDO gateway.

Now the Internet-bound message can take a number of routes, but here is a 
pretty common scenario.  This assumes that the local BBS routes Internet mail
through its Fido HUB, vice calling the gateway itself...

The message is dropped off at the HUB during the BBS' next mail exchange.

The HUB reads the Fido address of the USENET/FIDONET gateway from the message
and routes it as normal Fido mail.

The Fido message is received at the gateway machine, as any other Fido message
would, but the message, instead of being addressed to a USER on that BBS, is
addressed to the key-word "UUCP..." 

The gateway runs a program called UFGATE that can take Fido style messages, and
UUCP them up to the Ineternet/USENET using the standard "G" protocol that most
unix boxes use.  To the internet, it is a standard old internet message...

From there the internet routes the message to WHEREEVER it is addressed, and viola!

The route from Internet to Fido is exactly the same except backwards -- the
gateway receives internet mail, converts it to Fido, and sends it on its
way...

Cheers,
Howie, not an expert!

Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: thigpen@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov (Keith Thigpen)
Subject: Re: Any reommendations for MS-DOS uucp?
Organization: NASA/MSFC
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 23:08:48 GMT

One of the things that I am looking for in a UUCP package is the ability to
access both mail AND news. Looks like FSUUCP includes all that with the
standard distribution.

How do you incorporated that with UUPC? James Sizemore says that he uses SNEWS,
but after a quick read (ok, it's late Friday afternoon and I'm ready to go 
home-- I don't have TIME for a long read) of the SNEWS docs it appears that
SNEW is targeting MUSH. Can it be easily integrated with UUPC?

Has anyone tested them both? I'd like some information on their comparative
strengths and weaknesses.

Thanks in advance, guys.
Keith

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Keith Thigpen          thigpen@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov      (205)461-4936   |
| New Technology, Inc.   Marshall Space Flight Center     Huntsville, AL   |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky comp.mail.uucp:1765 biz.comp.telebit:902 comp.dcom.modems:13079
From: leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,biz.comp.telebit,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: FAX and BBS in the SAME line.
Date: 7 Sep 92 16:04:45 GMT
Reply-To: 70465.203@compuserve.com
Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon.

Denny.Chuang@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Denny Chuang) writes:

>	Help!    Anyone know how to run a BBS and FAX machine using
>the FAX/MODEM like PM14400FXSA or other FAX modems?

Well, on the Fido FDECHO the folks doing it succesfully are all
using Zyxel modems. Something about "adaptive answering" and returning
a "CONNECT FAX" message (and having a FAX receive program that can
be run *after* the connection is established).

They just tell FrontDoor to exit witrh an errorlevel when it gets a
CONNECT FAX message, and they have the batch file set to run the fax
software if that errorlevel is passed.

-- 
Leonard Erickson		      leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com
CIS: [70465,203]			 70465.203@compuserve.com
FIDO:   1:105/51	 Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
(The CIS & Fido addresses are preferred)
From: mark@lowton.rn.com (Mark Powell)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: HELP! No login prompt.
Keywords: UUCP, uugetty
Date: 7 Sep 92 13:04:43 GMT
Distribution: comp.mail.uucp
Organization: Mark-one Communications

In article <BtM5pp.37H@scd.hp.com> ddunlap@boi.hp.com (Doug Dunlap (DTC)) writes:
>I cannot get a login prompt from the remote machine.
>
>I am connecting via Telebit t300 modems at 14400 on
>HP-UX and am configured as such:
>
>/etc/inittab
> m2:2:respawn:/usr/lib/uucp/uugetty -r -t60 tty03 19200
>
>/etc/gettydefs
> 19200   # B19200 HUPCL IGNPAR PARENB ICRNL IXON OPOST ONLCR CS7 CREAD
>                  ISIG ICANON ECHO ECHOK PARENB ISTRIP IXANY TAB3
>         # B19200 SANE CS7 PARENB ISTRIP IXANY TAB3 HUPCL
>         #login: #19200
>
>/usr/lib/uucp/Devices 
>  Direct tty03 - 19200 direct
>
>My modems will connect with "CONNECT 14400", but I never
>get a login: prompt.

I get this problem when I connect to my feed without error correction.
His modem will talk to his computer at 38400 when an error correcting
call is negotiated, but at only 19200 when a non-error corrected call
is made. His getty only talks at 38400, so non error corrected calls
do not get a prompt.
Are you sure modems and gettys at each end are talking at the same
rates? My modem a HST DS v32bis will initially talk at the speed the 
serial line was at when the settings were last saved into NVRAM.
So you gotta remember this.

>Many thanks in advance.
>
>Doug Dunlap
-- 
Mark Powell

mark@lowton.rn.com   uunet!ibmpcug!jshark!lowton!mark   Nr. Manchester, UK.
Home: +44 942 714317  v32/v32bis news and email feeds soon. Just ask.
From: esj@harvee.billerica.ma.us (Eric S Johansson)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Distribution: world
Organization: gators 'r us
Subject: Re: when you find out- let me know
Reply-To: esj@harvee.billerica.ma.us
X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.03 Rev. Apr 14 1992
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 20:21:00 -0500

In <jester.716190826@crash>, Ken Bibb writes:
>
>The most common solutions are unix-based, but there are also DOS and
>MAC uucp implementations available via the Internet.  DOS Versions include
>fsuucp and taylor uucp; Mac Versions include Gnuucp and uupc (according
>to the O'Reilly "Managing UUCP and Usenet" book which should be required
>for anyone setting up uucp).

Don't forget that there are packages for Atari ST and Amiga machines
as well.  The best ST version is HERMES, a shareware package from
Germany and I think the Amiga version can be found on something
called "fish disks"(?)  if there is an interest, I can do
further research. 

Finding a package for uucp mail and news for small machines is
not difficult.  Finding a feed site for a reasonable fee is the hard
part and no, I do not consider uunet or PSI's fees reasonable for
a small home site.

BTW, can someone point me to the dos port of taylor uucp?
Thanks.

--- eric

-- 
HOME: esj@harvee.billerica.ma.us  HAM  ka1eec
WORK: 617.630.4687 (w)   esj@ruby.polaroid.com
source of the public's fear of the unknown since 1956
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,mail.sendmail,comp.mail.misc
From: anton@analsyn.gts.org (Anton J Aylward)
Subject: Re: smail3 returning undeliverable email - FIXED!
Organization: ASCI: UNIX Database and Communications
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 00:55:53 GMT

alan@ernest.dseg.ti.com (Alan Edmonds) writes:
: In article <1992Sep6.203447.7936@analsyn.gts.org> anton@analsyn.gts.org (Anton J Aylward) writes:
: >larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
: >: tron@Veritas.COM (Ronald S. Karr) writes:
: >: 
: >: >In article <Bu15o4.2uo@gator.rn.com> larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
: >: >>We are running smail3 release 26 (I think) here under SVR4 4.0
.....
: >: >>ka3ovk.  If ka3ovk doesn't pick up his email, I will get messages
: >: >>for the user bluemoon on this machine (in /usr/mail/bluemoon) that
: >: >>the email for ka3ovk is undeliverable - and that it will continue
: >: >>to try to deliver this traffic.
: >: 
: >Samed problem.
: >same version
: >same setup as Larry describes.
: 
: If you recompile smail3 with HDB_UUCP defined, you get the -a
: flag for the built in transports.
: But,  if you use a seperate transports file to override the 
: compiled in transports, you have to update the transports file
: by hand.
: 
: Just add the -a$sender to the uux lines in transports file in the 
: smail config directory.  What Ronald S. Karr said is correct; uux
: may be missing the -a flag. 
: 
: This works for me; I hope it works for you.
: 

This is how it was set up.
No it doesn't work.

--
Anton J Aylward
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: davidf@golem.uucp (David J. Fiander)
Subject: Re: mail from SCO via SunOS has bad header
Keywords: bogus Return-Path:
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 1992 21:31:55 GMT

According to camerons@NAD.3Com.COM:
>
>Fellow netters,
>Mail from my home site arrives at its destination bearing
>an extra header item of the form:
>
>Return-Path: <myuname!user>
>
>This line doesn't do anybody any good,
>and causes some destinations or intermediate sites to bounce my mail
>with various "protocol errors."
>My local mail expert tells me the Return-Path item is illegal and
>shouldn't appear in my mail at all while it is traveling.

Completely true.

>When I mail from my home to here at work,
>the extra line appears in the middle of the header, between the "Received by"
>from my uucp neighbor and the "Received: from" by the gateway machine here.
>
>My uucp-mail neighbor first explained I am using a "dumb" uucp
>and I should get a "smart" one,
>and then they said they are still "investigating."

UUCP is UUCP.  What they might be complaining about is that
they think that you are using a "dumb" mail system like pure
UUCP.  If you are using MMDF, then this is not the case.

>I have examined my outgoing messages in
>/usr/spool/uucp and there's no Return-Path: line in them.
>I found no mention of dumb nor smart in the Nutshell Guide
>_Managing UUCP and Usenet_.

If the header is not in the outgoing UUCP queue files, then it
is not your fault.

>My neighbor (whose name I'd prefer not be mentioned here) is a cluster
>of Suns running a stock SunOS.
>They don't know anything useful about SCO, AT&T, or mmdf.

Since the header is not in your outgoing uucp queue, and they
are running sendmail, then I would be forced to conclude that
it is their fault.
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
From: herrera@athena.mit.edu (Ramon F Herrera)
Subject: Looking for a host
Keywords: map host
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 01:38:11 GMT

I am trying to find the geographical location and/or
route to the host UUCP 'lctsw', and also the solution
to the general problem: given a host 'xxx', how can I
know more about it?  I am only Internet-literate.

thanks for yor help,

-Ramon Herrera

Xref: sparky comp.mail.uucp:1792 comp.mail.sendmail:2251
From: tron@Veritas.COM (Ronald S. Karr)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: smail3 problems
Date: 11 Sep 92 12:45:16 GMT
Organization: VERITAS Software

larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
> I have problems with undeliverable email being mailed
> back to the local account used for login verses the original 
> sender.
> 
> For example, rde logs in as rde -- in passwd he get the same
> uid and gid as uucp 

Most likely what is happening is that you created a transports file based
on samples/generic/transports and did not change the file to make the
appropriate changes for HoneyDanBer.  Adding HAVE=HDB_UUCP to the conf/os
or EDITME files affects the pre-configured configuration, but adding a
transports file usually wipes out the pre-configured configuration, so
HAVE=HDB_UUCP has no effect.

What you must do is change all of the uucp-based transports in the
transports file to use the second cmd= line, the one containing the
-a and -g arguments.  This requires changes to the transports
uux, demand, uusmtp, demand_uusmtp, inet_uusmtp, inet_demand_uusmtp,
local_uux, local_demand, local_uusmtp, and local_demand_uusmtp.
For example, to change the basic uux transport, look for uux: in the
transports file, then comment out the first cmd= line in the transport
and uncomment the line that follows.  The result will look like this:

# uux - deliver to the rmail program on a remote UUCP site
#
# HDB UUCP users should comment out the first cmd= line below, and
# uncomment the second.
uux:	driver=pipe,
	uucp,				# use UUCP-style addressing forms
	from,				# supply a From_ envelope line
	max_addrs=5,			# at most 5 addresses per invocation
#	max_addrs=1,			# use this if some of your neighbors
#					# can't handle multiple addresses
#					# given to their rmail.  You might,
#					# alternately, want to configure
#					# a uux_one_addr transport that
#					# does this.
	max_chars=200;			# at most 200 chars of addresses

	# the -r flag prevents immediate delivery, parentheses around the
	# $user variable prevent special interpretation by uux.
	#cmd="/usr/bin/uux - -r $host!rmail $(($user)$)",
	cmd="/usr/bin/uux - -r -a$sender -g$grade $host!rmail $(($user)$)",
	pipe_as_sender,			# have uucp logs contain caller
	log_output,			# save error output for bounce messages
#	defer_child_errors,		# retry if uux returns an error
-- 
	tron |-<=>-|		ARPAnet:  veritas!tron@apple.com
      tron@veritas.com		UUCPnet:  {apple,pyramid}!veritas!tron
From: sizemorj@witness.hernix.org (James E. Sizemore Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Any reommendations for MS-DOS uucp?
Distribution: world
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 02:56:24 GMT
Organization: Hernix.org
Reply-To: sizemorj@witness.hernix.org


In article <kevinf.716061977@infmx> kevinf@tofu.informix.com writes:

 > 
 > thigpen@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov (Keith Thigpen) writes:
 > 
 > >Hi netters.
 > 
 > >I'm looking for a good MS-DOS uucp package that I can run under windows.
 > 
 > >The most popular one (from my informal survey of net traffic) is FSUUCP.
 > >Are there any other strong contenders?
 > 
 > >One of the guys here at work uses FSUUCP, but he uses 1.2 'cause apparently
 > >1.3 doesn't run well in unattended mode. Is this correct? Is 1.3 fairly
 > >clean? (bugwise).
 > 
 > >Thanks in advance for the info. I'd like to get another PC up at home
 > >and install Unix, but this seems to be the best interim solution.
 > 
 > >Thanks again,
 > >Keith
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > I use UUPC/Extended - shareware from Kendra Electronic Wonderworks.  I like
 > it alot.  It has mail and uucp; it'll talk to itself and to a *nix host
 > as well.  Source is included.
 > 
 > I havn't used any others but I`m real happy with UUPC/Extended.
 > 
 > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 > Kevin Franden                                   Informix Software, Inc.
 >                                                 16011 College Blvd      
 > kevinf@informix.com                             Lenexa, KS.  66219
 > {pyramid|uunet}!infmx!kevinf
 > 
 > fprintf(DISCALIMER,"I said what I said and not my employer");
 > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 > 
 > There are Lies, Damn lies, Statistics, Benchmarks, and Delivery Dates
 > 

 I also use uupc along with SNEWS which makes me become a leafnode.  It
 works great plus it's free.


 James E. Sizemore Jr.                         Telephone: 216-822-8561
 sizemorj@witness.hernix.org                   Address: 3228 BERKELEY ROAD
                                               CLEVELAND OHIO, 44118
From: Dave-Nuttall@cup.portal.com (David Dave Nuttall)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Wanted:  UUCP <--> MHS Software
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 92 05:46:21 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

I've heard of shareware software called "UGATE" which is supposed to provide a
bridge between UNIX/UUCP and MHS compliant gateways (ala Novell).  UGATE
apparently is on CompuServe, but I don't have an account there.  If you know
of its existence elsewhere, pls drop me an e-mail note.

Also, if anyone can identify other software which will do the same thing,
I'd be interested in hearing about that.   Ideally, the solution will be
free or inexpensive.

We're looking at connecting geographically separated sites which run cc:Mail,
BeyondMail and all sorts of UNIX machines (Sun, SCO, AT&T).

Thanks.

Dave
Alt.E-mail=dave@csoftec.csf.com
Xref: sparky comp.mail.uucp:1748 biz.comp.telebit:890 comp.dcom.modems:13028