From: banerjee@hsc.usc.edu (Samit Banerjee)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian
Subject: Re: A Message from Banerjee's Sys Administrator.
Date: 5 Jan 1993 17:25:04 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: hsc.usc.edu

In article <1794@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> chemsn@emory.edu (Sreehari Nimmala) writes:
>Samit has repented.  If you see any offensive a rticles after 8 Dec
>92

Here are the contents of my sincerest "repentance". The  article that proved
offensive to the Victorian sensibilities of Aayush Asthana and the raving,
schizophrenic ignorant, nimrod Sreehari Nimmala.

*****************************************************************************
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 92 16:22:25 PST
From: Samit Banerjee <banerjee@hsc.usc.edu>
To: Brian Yamaguchi <yamaguch@ucs.usc.edu>
Subject: Re: banerjee@hsc.usc.edu - unofficial warning

Brian,

The contents of your mail is acknowledged. I do not regret saying anything
that I posted. Hence this is not a apology note.

I would like to know the names of the person(s) who complained.

Regards,
Samit Banerjee
******************************************************************************
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 92 16:42:55 PST
From: Brian Yamaguchi <yamaguch@ucs.usc.edu>
To: Samit Banerjee <banerjee@hsc.usc.edu>
Cc: Brian Yamaguchi <yamaguch@ucs.usc.edu>
Subject: Re: banerjee@hsc.usc.edu - unofficial warning
Message-Id: <CMM.0.90.2.723861775.yamaguch@canopus.usc.edu>

Samit,

The complaints originated with:

	Sreehari Nimmala <chemsn@unix.cc.emory.edu>
	Aayush Asthana <aa@iti.org> [twice]

Regards,
Brian Yamaguchi
UCS Technical Support
*******************************************************************************

Date: Tue, 8 Dec 92 15:06:18 PST
From: Brian Yamaguchi <yamaguch@ucs.usc.edu>
To: banerjee@phad.hsc.usc.edu
Message-Id: <CMM.0.90.2.723855978.yamaguch@canopus.usc.edu>

We've received complaints that you've been posting derogatory and
intolerant articles to soc.culture.indian:

You never seem to learn when to quit you ignorant mongrel. Every time you open,
what you supposedly call your mouth, you put your foot in it.
Your knee jerk, wimpy reaction as evidenced by your pathetic response
"I have no concern whatsoever" seems typical of your foul smelling-nose digging
-genital stratching-pot bellied-oily haired-country liquor cosuming kind.
A flame that is completely devoid of any shred of intelligence or rationality
evokes pity and sympathy at this end. You make a pretty poor opponent and
and it seems a complete waste of my time and effort to continue this one-sided
conversation. Is this the best you are capable of doing? Pretty pathetic
actually, even considering your severe anatomical and intellectual handicaps.
 
Your grand fetishes of bestiality not withstanding, the fact that the only
portion of my post which made any sense to you also happened to evoke nostalgic
memories of a canine upbringing speaks volumes of the level of your intellect
and sophistication. On the other hand it seems like another one of Murphy's
law's that such a fine example of a Pavlovian experiment gone terribly astray,
like yourself, should find so much in common with canine mating habits.
Probably an  inherited trait, a Mendelian dominant characteristic.
 
Samit

******************************************************************************

-- 
Samit Banerjee,			    |  
University of Southern California   |  A man who smiles when things go wrong,
Internet: banerjee@scf.usc.edu      |  has found somebody to blame it on.
Bellnet : (213) 342-1401            |  
Xref: sparky soc.culture.indian:43417 soc.culture.china:34255 soc.culture.tamil:4971 soc.culture.indian.telugu:1611