HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: davidc@cs.uwa.oz.au (David Cake)
Subject: Re: SANDMAN: A Game Of You
Organization: Dept. Computer Science, University of Western Australia.
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 05:59:33 GMT

I also found that 'Bones of the Moon' had a great deal of similarities with a 
Game Of You. I would not accuse Gaiman of plagiarising, but I would not be
surprised if it formed part of his inspiration. If I was Gaiman, writing a book
about dreamlands, and I read 'Bones of the Moon', I would be very hard put not
to have a try at writing my own version of that story.
	Jonathon Carroll is an utterly fabulous writer. His stories are all
in that vein, original modern fantasy with a nasty edge (and good character
development). I have read and can recommend Black Cocktail, Sleeping In Flame,
Voices from Beyond (? I am almost certain that this is not the title, but can't
remember the real one), and Land of Laughs. I particularly recommend Sleeping In
Flame, not only very original, but one of the best twist endings I have ever
read. There is some excellent short fiction out there as well. 
	There are quite a few ideas that Neil could find a use for in his other 
books as well, particularly Land of Laughs (which deals with creativity and 
writing) and Sleeping in Flame (which has a little to do with fairy-tales).
A truly great fantasy writer, his books are also compulsively readable, and 
quite short. And he has a villain called Fire Sandwich (the best name for a 
charcter I can recall in recent memory).

David Cake		|life is easily understood as bit strings with logical
[WLM] Weird Little Man	|depth greater than their length - Rebis, Doom Patrol
Cognitive science, UWA	|..think about a government entirely of fish - JBC				
-- 
David Cake		|life is easily understood as bit strings with logical
[WLM] Weird Little Man	|depth greater than their length - Rebis, Doom Patrol
Cognitive science, UWA	|..think about a government entirely of fish - JBC
From: breitzsp@cnsvax.uwec.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: BOOKS:Good Omens-Gaiman&Pratchett
Date: 6 Apr 92 20:58:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: cnsvax.1992Apr6.145854.249
Organization: University of Wisconsin Eau Claire

Just a side bar to this original post, Terry and Neil's novel
GOOD OMENS is one of the funniest novels I have ever read.  Please
pick it up whenever you get the chance.  It is fabulous!!!
Scotty B
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: Re: Professor X (X-Men Cards)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 22:51:02 GMT

In article <72822@netnews.upenn.edu> fhuang@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (->  `BOGUEMAN'
  <-) writes:
>
>       I bought the X-Men card set a few days ago and noticed that
>Professor X, the preeminent telepath on Earth, was only rated a 6
>(out of 7) in `mental strength.' Jean Grey is also rated a 6 while
>Phoenix (Rachel Summers) is rated a 7. All respect due to Jean and
>Phoenix and their tk powers, but let's give ol' chrome-dome
>wheelchairman some respect.

Well Rachel is a cosmic avatar.  Also Prof. X. is the most powerful MUTANT telep
ath on Earth.  I figure Phoenix(not really a mutant in power levels), Doctor
Strange and a few others are more powerful than him.

------SCAVENGER

-- 
If some unemployed punk in New Jersey, can     |kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu <-I.NET
get a cassette to make love to Elle McPherson  |
for $19.95, this virtual reality stuff is going|No matter where you go,
to make crack look like Sanka. -  Dennis Miller| there you are."-Buckaroo Banzai
From: RDAY@cmsa.gmr.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Wolvie Card in first pack
Date: 8 Apr 92 23:36:44 GMT
Organization: GM Research Labs

In article <1992Apr7.112719.257@cnsvax.uwec.edu>
breitzsp@cnsvax.uwec.edu writes:

>
>>>Oh, yeah -- I'm willing to sell Wolvie for $100.00. Let me know if
>>>you're interested! :)
>>
>>     I have bought twenty packs total and got four holograms (TWO Wolverine,
>> 1 Gambit, 1 team).  I have seen these for sale in many comic shops for $4.00 r
>> $5.00 a each.  Your kidding right?
>>
>What is the deal with the inflated prices of these holo's? I don't collect them
>but just from being in some shops where these are for sale the prices seem
>silly.  Everyone has been saing that they get almosta complete set of holo's
>and two complete sets of regular cards if they buy a box so why pay five
>dollars a card for holo's when a box is around 30$?
>
>I just don't understand,
>Scotty B
>
$30.00 !!!!!!!?!?!?!????  HOLY COW......  My comix dealer was giving them
away for $14.00 a box PLUS the member discount.

Jeff
From: mwinston@lust.reed.edu (Michael J. Winston)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Marshall Law
Date: 7 Apr 92 14:42:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Apr7.144226.16481
Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR

Just a quick question:

Besides Marshall Law 1-6 and Marshall Law takes Manhattan, what Marshall  
Law books have come out?

Michael J. Winston
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: The Little Mermaid #4: Submerged in Horror
From: Peter_A_David@cup.portal.com
Date: 8 Apr 92 12:24:19 GMT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

The conclusions that academics came up with for "Mermaid?"  Oh, that it was
misogynist.  That Ursula suffered from penis envy for Triton, symbolized by
the sceptre.  That Ursula's hangout was designed to look like a womb and
Ariel was symbolically seeking out a mother figure.  That the movie implied
that women are nothing but sexual figures or dangerous.  That sort of thing.

PAD
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: birmingh@fnala.fnal.gov (Phillip J. Birmingham)
Subject: Re: SPLIT: Proposed charter and poll
Organization: Aardvark Comment Sucks Club
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 17:57:20 GMT

In article <sdusfwu00VB357UFEt@andrew.cmu.edu>, Andrew David Weiland <aw1s+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> While I'm in favor of a comics.superheros split, I don't think
> discussion should begin until the .manga issue is resolved.  It's a bad
> idea to have two heirarchy discussions about the same group at the same
> time.

         I agree. Let's get the soc.religion.manga issue out of the way,
    then we can start bashing each other over the split.

-- 
 Phillip J. Birmingham   birmingh@fnal.fnal.gov  
 *REC.ARTS*.manga?  Oh.... never mind
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: uk02700@nx05.mik.uky.edu (mitchell e french)
Subject: Re: adamantium
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 21:36:23 GMT
Distribution: usa
X-Bytes: 

In article <1992Apr13.183731.6138@en.ecn.purdue.edu>  
rymarz@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Daniel Rymarz) writes:
> What is the tensile strength of adamantium?
> Brinnel hardness?
> Izod impact?
> Modulus of elasticity?
> Melting point? 
> 
> How do you sharpen adamantium claws?
> 
> How unbreakable is unbreakable? Could you drop a tank of Wolverine and 
> have him come out smelling like a rose?
> 
> 
> 	
	According to the Handbook of the Marvel Universe, adamantium just  
doesn't change after it hardens.  It can't break, it can't bend, it can't  
be screwed with in any fashion.  They even say that it won't flow if it  
does melt.  
	Thus, adamantium claws never get dull, so they need no sharpening.
	You could drop a tank on Wolvie and he would be smushed somewhat.   
His bones would not break.

Mushroom
From: sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics,rec.music.dementia
Subject: Re: Billy Mumy (WAS Re: DC: Doom Patrol Annotations (long))
Date: 12 Apr 92 20:31:31 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

fal20643@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Capt. Frank A. Lauro) writes:

>rjung@aludra.usc.edu (Robert A. Jung) writes:
>>>More Billy Mumy trivia: he wrote/sang a very strange song called "Fish
>>>Heads", sometime in the early eighties (I think).

>>  Even more Bill Mumy trivia: He's half of the comedy music group "Barnes and
>>Barnes", which is where he did "Fish Heads" originally. B&B have also done a
>>bunch of other stuff, including "Touch Yourself" (a bouncy number about...er,
>>safe sex) and "Goodbye Old Friends" (a farewell to STAR TREK VI).

>Yet *more* trivia:  the other half of Barnes & Barnes was Miguel Ferrer,
>Albert Rosenfield of TWIN PEAKS.  


Still more Bill M. trivia: As a kid, he had a few parts on "The Twilight
Zone."  One of his roles was the psychokinetic kid in "It's a *Good*
Day," an episode which later found its way (in altered form) into the
"Twilight Zone" movie.

                                            --Steve Stelter
                                           sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: morrow@fnala.fnal.gov (And the elmo Lies Down on Broadway)
Subject: Re: DC: The Griffin
Organization: I can't dance, either
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 01:09:09 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.203845.6692@spool.cs.wisc.edu>, rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon) writes:
> Sadly, the Griffin newsletter said that low sales made it almost impossible
> for there to be a sequel from DC, which I think is really too bad as The
> Griffin is the best series I've read in the last year or so.

> Michael Rawdon
> rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu

	This is a pity.  I thought the Griffin was really pretty good.  It
actually had me eagerly anticipating the next issue every month, where I'm
content to sit and wait for most others, up to and including Sandman.
-- 
"After him!  After him!"
Ralph was going crazy.  "After who?" he cried, heedless of grammar.
--Donald E. Westlake

elmo (morrow@fnal.fnal.gov,morrow@physics.rice.edu)
From: jcp@gauss.rutgers.edu (Jonathan Petersen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: MUTANT: Rogue and Sexual Harassment
Date: 13 Apr 92 15:40:16 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

RE: A previous post said that since Lobdell was taking over the book, his 
"usual" treatment of touchy subject matter (i.e. present it up front, then
leave the book, as with the "Northstar is gay" issue of Alpha Flight) would
probably occur.

Well, when I spoke to Lobdell yesterday at a NYC con, he said that yes, it was
his decision to make Northstar face up to his being gay.  Scott said that he
had felt that Northstar had an attitude problem and thought that publicly 
dealing with his feelings would be a big leap in character development.  He 
approached the editors and they agreed.
Then, he was fired.  The editors wanted to be able to say, "Yes, we did it, but
we fired the guy responsible so we're on your side if you hated it; on the
other hand, we approved it so we're on your side if you liked it."  The editors
covered themselves by appointing artists that Lobdell specifically said he 
did not want to work with and by wanting a 13 member team when Scott told them
he wanted to keep the team small.  Citing editorial differences, he was let go.
What does this has to do with Rogue?  Everything.  The short follow-up to the
sensitive subject was the fault of the editors, not Lobdell.  There is no 
reason to expect that if he brought it up he wouldn't follow-up fairly. 

However, there could be some problems.  First, Gambit is supposed to be getting
his own book next year.  There is a strong possibility that the editors 
wouldn't let this development come up just so Gambit would remain as popular.
Second, I doubt that Marvel realizes what's going on.  They probably see Gambit
as only "agressive", not "harrassing".  After all, it's not a crime to be 
agressive, is it?  Perhaps we should write to Marvel telling them how we see
the issue.  After all, if someone were to get wind that sexuall harassment is
being presented as "heroic" or even "acceptable" behavior, they are going to 
get some real bad press and sales could fall.  And we know Marvel would take
that threat seriously.
Jonathan
From: vjmurphy@carina.unm.edu (Phred T. Platypus)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: DC: General Editorial plans for '92
Date: 15 Apr 92 06:03:58 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <x89t8k+@rpi.edu> bulloj@aix.rpi.edu () writes:
>In article <1992Apr13.230415.1591@HQ.Ileaf.COM> tyg@HQ.Ileaf.COM (Thomas Galloway) writes:
>>JUSTICE LEAGUE TASK FORCE will be written by David Michelinie and will have
>>only three regular characters; J'onn and Gypsy, and a career politician as
>>coordinator. Other characters who may or may not be JLI members will
>>appear, with a different team for each 3-4 issue arc/mission.
>>
>This could be good. It would definitely be a shame to let J'onn J'onnz
>go to waste as a character, and having him in less of a team book may 
>be good for character development. I also think it's a good idea to include

   This reminds me of the idea that DC originally had for the Justice
 League after Legends: Batman would run the league as a Mission:
 Impossible like organization.  He would pick the people with the
 correct powers for the job.  It made a lot of sense to me then.  In
 fact, it still does.  It's got to be better than the new Justice
 League crap.


-- 
"You ask me if sex is one of the most  _\_\    _/_/     Phred Platypus
 important things in life?  Absolutely. _\_\  _/_/  Grammarian of Vengeance
 But the lack of it is even likelier     _\_\_/_/ [ vjmurphy@carina.unm.edu ]
 to drive you nuts." -- Harlan Ellison    _\_/       Vincent J. Murphy
From: justin@inmet.camb.inmet.com (Justin du Coeur MKA Mark Waks)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Best/Worst PAD
Date: 16 Apr 92 22:02:01 GMT
	<1992Apr8.210725.15450@Princeton.EDU>
	<1992Apr9.190525.8802@spool.cs.wisc.edu>
Organization: Many, Sundry, and Odd

I'm astonished. Granted, I'm a week behind (damned newsfeed), but I
haven't yet seen anyone post my candidate for Peter's Worst. I've read
most of his work, from Spiderman through Justice and Dreadstar to
the Hulk. Most is good, and enough is quite good that I'm not going
to venture an opinion on his best.

But the absolute worst was Blasters. Anyone remember this? It was a
couple of years ago. Snapper Carr in space, and some of the dumbest
jokes Peter has ever come up with. Fourth wall breaking that makes
She-Hulk look subtle. One of my top candidates for "Comic most
deserving of being forgotten by Jonni DC"...

(Sorry, Peter. I *do* love most of your work, but everyone has
an off month...)

				-- Justin du Coeur
				   Popping in for a quick post

Random Quote du Jour:

"If Milli Vanilli fall in the woods, does someone else make a sound?"
Organization: The Pennylvania State University
Date: Thursday, 9 Apr 1992 10:05:28 EDT
From: Ernie Oporto <EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Dark Empire - Nagging Question

In article <92099.031426DCC117@psuvm.psu.edu>, <DCC117@psuvm.psu.edu> says:
>
>This topic might possibly have been discussed here a long time ago, but I'm
>kind of wondering about something. Is the DH Dark Empire plot supposed to
>make sense continuity-wise with regard to Zahn's "Heir to the Empire" series?

Yes, it is....it happens after the Zahn books.

>In the first issue of Dark Empire, a synopsis reference is made to Admiral
>Thrawn, which seems to link the two plots; other things such as Leia's twin
>children seem to give the linkage credibility.  If we are to assume that the
>Dark Empire plot does indeed follow Zahn's books in continuity, then,
>apparently, we know several things about Zahn's upcoming books:
>   1. NOBODY IMPORTANT DIES on the Rebel side.
>   2. No serious dent is made in the remaining Imperial forces.
>   3. Thrawn probably dies.
>   4. C'baoth probably dies or reassumes seclusion as a "Guardian" figure.
>   5. Palpatine hides the fact of his continued existence from everybody.
>   6. Even if Luke and Mara hook up, she probably dies.

Even so, Zahn isn't allowed to make any major changes in the characters.
Only Lucas can do that, so its a sure bet no one important will die.

>This sort of takes a certain degree of suspense out of the remaining Zahn
>books, I think - not that most of these conclusions aren't the type that
>people could come up with on their own ( The part about people not dying
>is sort of reminiscient of Spock and McCoy in Star Trek VI ).  Also, there
>could be some logical problem involving Byss, Coruscant, and the "Imperial
>Planet" they were fighting on in Dark Empire #1.  Will the real seat of
>power of the Galactic Empire please stand up???

Actually, I wish they had done more with the Empire's civil war than
gone on with reviving old characters.

  _____)           ______        _)       _)  EAO102@PSUVM.PSU.EDU
                               __       __    Ernie "SHOKK" Oporto
______    ______            ___      ___      Computer Laboratory
                               __       __    Attendant for the Penn
(_______ _      _ ________ _     _) _     _)  State CAC Department
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: tpjg9663@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Thomas P. Johnston)
Subject: Re: Flash year 1 --- yawwwnnn NOT!
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 20:22:46 GMT

wrlutz@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (William R Lutz) writes:

>I also like the story told from Wally's point of view.  I've always thought
>the idea of Kid Flash was a little stoooopid.  But with the new information
>about Barry "causing" the flash powers of Wally's it is kind of neat.  And
What do you mean by "causing"?  Are you referring to Barry's revealing the
powers by getting Wally to run after the baseball?  Or are you referring
to the Secret Origins story?

>on this note: where did the lightning bolt come from that caused Wally's
>powers?  Was it real?  Or is Wally the real cause of his powers like Barry?
>Or more importantly did Barry "force" his powers on Wally?
These are all good questions.  Unfortunately, the current storyline has
not addressed any of them.  And I have a sinking feeling that they are
not going to.  From the final panel of part II, I would guess that
they are moving off of the origin, and into the early adventures next
issue.

>	I hope they will explore the Wally, Barry, and even Jay freindships
>and conections with each other and their powers.  Even with the crisis stuff
>screwing with the DC universe it could be interesting.
Agreed.  So far I have found Flash Year 1 boring because of its, well,
leisurely pace. The only 'new idea' in two issues, from what I can
remember, was the bit with Barry throwing the baseball, etc.

I like the supporting cast that's established in the Flash: Connie,
Chunk, the Pied Piper, Mason, Joan Garrick, Wally's Mom, Wally's
psychologist (not really developed, but makes for some interesting
conversations w/Wally).  I'm hoping for the best from the new
writer, and I hope that the supporting cast will not be dumped.

Tom
From: afarrell@maths.tcd.ie (Andrew Farrell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Rogue and Cyclops Questions
Date: 17 Apr 92 08:25:23 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Maths, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

In <1992Apr16.172320.11208@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> teo33398@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Doctor Zero) writes:

>donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald) writes:

>>Ok, but why... I just proposed the theory, but no one who has shot it down has
>>tol me why a telepath of some power (Like Charles) could not hold Rogue off.

>>David.

>	Here goes...

>	Now, the victim can resist in two ways.  One way is simply not to
>get touched.  Touching someone through clothes won't work (or Rogue will 
>get all of the powers and mentality of Spandex, you make the call). 

I will not reply,I will not reply, I will not reply, I will not reply, I will not reply, I will not reply, I will not reply, I will not reply,...... 

Andrew, Lead Villian of The Brotherhood of Evil Rogue-Haters
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
From: gls@windmill.att.com (Colonel Sicherman)
Subject: Re: Artemis
Organization: Save the Dodoes Foundation
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 20:22:46 GMT

In <9Ap+#9A@engin.umich.edu>, jim ottaviani@um.cc.umich.edu writes:
> 
> Bill -- Why did you spell the Roach's name "Artemis" instead of 
> "Artemus"? "Artemis" is/was female.

And "Artemas" is male.  Artemas Ward was a revolutionary war general;
when the humorist C. F. Browne adopted the name, he spelled it "Artemus"
because he was writing in the character of an ignorant man.

(And Echo answers: "an ignorant man")

(Shut up, Eccles!)

-:-
	Nothing changes,
	  But nothing's the same....
	Dance and love,
	  Eat and fight
	At the DISCO,
	  Disco Delight!

			--Bob Burden, "Disco Delight"
-- 
Col. G. L. Sicherman
gls@windmill.att.COM
From: kji+@BABYLON.MT.CS.CMU.EDU (Kathi Iannamico)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: mistake
Date: 15 Apr 92 15:35:17 GMT
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Originator: kji@BABYLON.MT.CS.CMU.EDU

that post:final poll, was meant for rec.arts.comics.strips...as you probably
guessed.
From: ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil (G. Host)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Voice your opinions!
Date: 9 Apr 92 00:08:14 GMT
Reply-To: ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil (G. Host)
Organization: Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC

Keywords:  DC, L.E.G.I.O.N.

> Article <1992Apr8.193428.2881@njitgw.njit.edu> From: rhr9081@hertz.njit.edu (Ray Rich)

> In article <92098.134014JRB128@psuvm.psu.edu> JRB128@psuvm.psu.edu (JUDITH R. BELSON) writes:

> >         I'm always interested in looking at comics I may have overlooked
> >  and never bought and read through before, so give me your choices for Best
> >  UNDERRATED Comic That's Worth Making an Extra Trip to the Comic
> >  Shop to Buy. Also, explain why.

> >              ---Thank's to anyone who replies
> >                                        The Jimothy.

> 	IMHO, DC's L.E.G.I.O.N. '92.  Great art, great characters, great
> stories.  'Nuff said.
> 						Raythrax


Agreed.  L.E.G.I.O.N. started very slowly and now it one of my top books
to read.  I have got a real liking for Alan Grant now.

But before you run out to the store and put down a deposit
for the next 12 issues, Alan Grant is leaving L.E.G.I.O.N.
and Barry Kitson becomes scripter.

In general quality does down when an artist takes over a book
and I can see some of threads Mr. Kitson has planted has a
co-plotter.  I am expecting more and more strange aliens which we
never see again.  I doubt he will be able to maintain the level
of political entrigue.
-- 
Glenn Host - Senior Systems Analyst (ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil)
NRL Code 5800, 4555 Overlook Ave.; Washington, DC 20375   (202) 767-2046
12307 Tigers Eye Court ; Reston, VA 22091                 (703) 620-1141
From: albert@chain.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Rick Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics
Subject: Re: Nightwing and Starfire (Spoilers)
Date: 7 Apr 1992 14:30:57 GMT
Organization: Baylor College of Medicine

In article <gspjgc_@lynx.unm.edu> vjmurphy@carina.unm.edu (Phred T. Platypus) writes:
>    Spoilers Ho:
>

>
>    I just heard some news on the Comics-L list about Nightwing
> and Starfire.  Apparently, DC is planning on marrying these two
> off.  All I can say is:
>  NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO!
>   This is an incredibly STUPID idea.  It will limit both characters
> massively.  Also, it will prematurely end the Nightwing/Starfire/
> Mirage triangle.  Needless to say, I am pissed.

	Well, IMHO, this Mirage triangle is no such thing.  Mirage
has hormones over Nightwing.  Dick and Kory have never even seen 
this girl.  And why should Dick even look twice at her?  He's 
madly in love with Kory, and there's no real reason for them not
to get married (except for that bogus marriage thing from a few years
ago).
	Why is marriage going to limit the characters?  Sure, they can't
act like Riker and Troi on Star Trek, and boff the guest star of the 
week, but is that limiting. 
	IMHO, marriage is a great thing for Nightwing.  Seeing 'little
Dick Grayson' getting hitched is a great thing for those of us 
who followed his career for so long.
	And, I want to see Gar throw the bachelor party ;-)
-- 
Rick Jones				Systems Support Center
albert@bcm.tmc.edu			Baylor College of Medicine
Voice: 713-798-7352			standard disclaimers apply
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.