HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Acknowledge-To: <HOPE@UKANVM>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.psycgrad
Date:         Sat, 26 Sep 1992 12:04:51 CDT
              <PSYCGRAD@UOTTAWA.BITNET>
From:         Mike Babyak <HOPE@UKANVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Multiple personalities...
              26 Sep 1992 12:57:13 -0400 from <kwhite@WAM.UMD.EDU>

I don't have the citations off-hand, but I know in Bruner's
*Acts of Meaning* he cites work that suggests that therapists,
particularly in North America,may contribute or even cause a
client to perceive themselves as MPD.  I think the evidence shows
that dissociation is a real phenomenon, but the above suggests that
how it is manifested may be at least in part a function of cues
or norms.
I have been connected to clinical cases which were diagnosable as MPD,
and to be frank, I am not sure how you could ever demonstrate
whether it was *really* happening.  The important part seemes to
be that the client clearly believes that he or she is operating
as several personalities and does so.

MIKE BABYAK UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS         *THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE HOME*
HOPE@UKANVM
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.psycgrad
From: bwalther@alfred.carleton.ca (Bill Walther)
Subject: Re: Freud
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 12:39:21 GMT

In <MAILQUEUE-99.920923095619.288@fs1.psy.emory.edu> FAIGELES@FS1.PSY.EMORY.EDU writes:


>    Jeffrey Masson has written a book on FReud and the seduction
>theory entitled "The Assault on Truth" or something to that effect.
>He was working in the Freud archives and then dramatically left there
>to publish the hidden "truth".  However, this book is quite
>sensationalist and would be best read in addition to Freud's own
>writings as well as more academic biographies of Freud.
 
If you read Masson's book, you should also read Janet Malcolm's "In
the Freud Archives" (Vintage Books, 1983).  She relates the quite
fantastic events surrounding Masson's "discoveries", including the
story of Peter Swales, former Rolling Stones roadie who has become one
of the top Freud Scholars.  Great stuff, and necessary to an
understanding of where Masson is coming from.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.psycgrad
Date:         Thu, 1 Oct 1992 09:32:31 EDT
              <PSYCGRAD@UOTTAWA.BITNET>
From:         "Matthew Simpson" <054340@UOTTAWA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: clinical and experimental psychology

On Wed, 30 Sep 1992 18:50:04 EDT Sala, Linda said:
>OR they may ask you.....what kind of shoes do you sell....do
>you enjoy it.....how is your life.....and so on. Get it?
>They may talk your head off just for the sake of talking.
>I've seen it a million times.  Go with a friend, subject them.
>Just kidding..........stressful day.
>
>Linda
>
Linda, what are you talking about?  Who is "they?"

O======================================================================O
 | _  l  _  * Matthew Simpson          * BITNET:                      |
 |  \_l_/   * School of Psychology     * 054340@uottawa.bitnet        |
 |    l     * 145 Jean Jacques Lussier * INTERNET:                    |
 |    l     * Ottawa, Ontario K1N 8P5  * 054340@acadvm1.uottawa.ca    |
O======================================================================O
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.psycgrad
Date:         Fri, 2 Oct 1992 08:44:06 EDT
              <PSYCGRAD@UOTTAWA.BITNET>
From:         Tim Tumlin <UFTRT@NERVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Multiple Pers. & Dissociation

Folks,
For those of you interested in MPD and dissociation, I got a flier for
this in the mail:
The 9th International Conference onMultiple Personality and Dissociative
States will be held Nov. 11-15 at the Drake Hotelin Chicago. It's
sponsored by the Department of Psychiatry at Rush-Presbyterian among
others. Costs vary according to what workshops you attend.
Write to:
Rush-Presbyterian - St. Luke's Medical Center
Office ofContinueing Medical Education
600 S. Paulina St.
Chicago, Ill. 60612

Tim
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.psycgrad
Date:         Mon, 5 Oct 1992 17:39:21 PDT
              <PSYCGRAD@UOTTAWA.BITNET>
From:         Steve Carter <scarter@ALMAAK.USC.EDU>
Subject:      The PSYCGRAD Project

To whomever can help me here...

I have received a description of (and invitation to) the Psycgrad
project (signed by Matthew Simpson).  I am planning on distributing
this post via the Psychology Dept. Grad Student Newsletter here at
USC, but I have a couple of questions first:

 (1) When was this list(s) established?
 (2) How many people (roughly) subscribe?
 (3) This is the most important: What does this sentence _mean_:

     >If you wish to subscribe to PSYCGRAD, the main list, send this
     >command to LISTSERV@ACADVM1.UOTTAWA.CA or LISTSERV@UOTTAWA. SUB
     >PSYCGRAD Yourfirstname Yourlastname Make sure that this is the
     >only text in the item of mail.

 We are on a Unix network system here at USC, and I cannot get anny
combination of the strings listed as a "command" in that sentence
to work (beyond getting me an error response from the system).

  If you could provide _very_explicit_ instructions (of the "type
this; hit the enter key" variety) it would be appreciated, as most
of the grad students I will be trying to recruit for you are novice
users of our system.

  Oh yeah, my pub deadline is Wednesday! ;)

SRC
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Tue, 6 Oct 1992 14:33:24 -0500
Comments:     <Parser> W: Invalid RFC822 field - ":READ  POPP     NOTE     A1".
              Rest of header flushed.
Comments:     <Parser> E: "From:"/"Sender:" field is missing.
From:         Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster <POSTMASTER@TCSVM.BITNET>

                                  NOTIS OPAC SIG MEETING
                                  Friday, October 9, 1992
                                       5:30-6:30 pm
                                          AGENDA


5:30-5:45 pm                  Introductions and general announcements

5:45-6:00 pm                  Cathy Cunningham from NOTIS will come to
                              discuss the questions/issues raised by
                              SIG members.  The following issues will
                              be discussed:

        a) If the enhancement ballot results show Guide Screen
        revisions to be very high on the list, what will be
        NOTIS' next steps?

        b) What plans are being made to make the graphical user
        interface version more workable?  How will the new
        revisions be tested?  Will the GUI version be reviewed
        to make it easier for persons with visual impairments
        to use?

        c) Please describe InfoBase in detail and talk about
        future plans for InfoBase.

        d) Since the enhancement process is being used by NOTIS
        to get information from users about general directions
        to pursue in the future rather than to get a list of
        specific needs for the next release, what does the
        NOTIS management see as the future of the enhancement
        process?  Should it change from a list of specific
        desires to be voted upon?  What should look like in the
        future?  Does NOTIS plan other ways to get user input?

        We thank Cathy for joining us and answering our
        questions.

6:00-6:30 pm                  Open discussion

        Discussion topic:  ideas for staff training and for
        informing users about new releases
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Indiana University Music Library
X-Acknowledge-To: <PAPAKHI@IUBVM>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 1 Oct 1992 21:48:43 EST
From:         "A. Ralph Papakhian" <PAPAKHI@IUBVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Passport 2.001 and GTO 3.0

On Thu, 1 Oct 1992 11:15:43 -0400 <AISTERWI@EKU> said:
>Bob,
>We type in XPO and hit F11. The LGTB transaction on CICS then abends
>with an ASRA and causes a STORAGE VIOLATION.  So I am working with
>NOTIS/GTO people to find the cause.
>
>What does your function key do differently than XPO and F11?
>
>Thanks. Earl Terwilliger AISTERWI@EKU.bitnet

We were a beta site for the new Passport version.  We have
2.00L or 2.00M (something like that--there were a lot of
versions).
But we have not experienced problems with xpo/gto.
Do you have the xpo configured with baud rate etc.?

Most cordially,
A. Ralph Papakhian, Music Library (Co-Listowner for MLA-L@IUBVM)
Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
(812) 855-2970  papakhi@iubvm.bitnet papakhi@iubvm.ucs.indiana.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 2 Oct 1992 12:31:13 -0500
From:         STEFFERJ@VUCTRVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: MARC Holdings Record OPAC Display Problem

I believe the problem you are describing is the same or similar to
one I reported to NOTIS.  The problem tracking number I got was
PPQ7486.  This appears to be fixed in 5.1.
_______________________________________________________________________________
/ Ramona Steffey Madewell              /               Bitnet:                /
/ Automation Project Librarian (LIB1)  /          STEFFERJ@VUCTRVAX           /
/ Vanderbilt University                /              Internet:               /
/ Library Systems                      /    stefferj@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu    /
/ 419 21st Avenue South                /       Phone: (615) 322-7125          /
/ Nashville, TN  37240                 /         Fax: (615) 343-0394          /
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 1 Oct 1992 19:56:58 EST
From:         Debbie Morrow <morrowd@GVSU.EDU>
Subject:      Zero hits -- staff mode
Comments: To: notis-l@tcsvm.bitnet
Comments: cc: normant@GVSU.EDU

   Well, here's a little mystery which I am almost embarrassed to put before
   the public, but here goes:

   Staff in Cataloging assure me that under 5.0.2 they are getting many more
   "no hit" searches in staff mode than used to be the case prior to 5.x, as
   often as 50% of the time.  The operator will type in a search, e.g.
   s=federal government (and they know its there, because they are working
   off of a new headings list or conflict & error detection report), and get
   no hits; then the operator will shorten the search to jx=federal gov
   (using the Delete key or EOF) and get one or more hits.  Now, there were
   no typos or punctuation in the first search, and it was not a
   particularly long search string.  Another example is 'jx=cooking'
   resulting in an index beginning with COOKING--ITALIAN, even though an
   authority record exists for 100::Cooking.  Trying the search again
   eventually brings up an index beginning with COOKING, they say.

   Has anybody else experienced this sort of 'flakiness' with MHI in staff
   mode?  There is a legitimate concern here that having to do every search
   twice to make sure what's in the index is time consuming; and that if
   this is carrying over into opac, then its a problem for patrons, too.
   Any thoughts will be greatly appreciated.

   Debbie M.

   Debbie Morrow / Automation Librarian/LIB1
   University Library / 108 JHZ
   Grand Valley State University / Allendale  MI   49401
   616/895-3581 / Internet: morrowd@gvsu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Auburn University Libraries
X-pmrqc:      1
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R3).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 1 Oct 1992 09:53:27 CST
From:         Beth Nicol <BNICOL@LIB.AUBURN.EDU>
Subject:      Passport 2 and GTO
Comments: To: notis-l@vm.tcs.tulane.edu

Earl:

Have you checked to make sure that the translation option [for the
new version] has been set to NOTRANC for the XPO port?  Even under
the older Passport we have had terminal forget this important fact.

We just got Passport 2, but haven't yet installed it, so please keep
us posted!




Beth Nicol                        ************************************
Automation Manager                * When in danger, or in doubt,     *
Auburn University Libraries       * Run in circles, scream & shout!  *
BITNET:  bnicol@auducvax          *          -R.Heinlein             *
INTERNET: bnicol@lib.auburn.edu   ************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 28 Sep 1992 14:27:16 LCL
From:         Bob Jones <BJONES@UNF1VM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Library guides

Using a gateway from LUIS (provided by the Florida Center for Library
Automation), the UNF Library supports a CMS account which automatically
loads GOPHER (an Internet node-to-node client/server system).  Through
GOPHER, library users can access, view and print library guides,
bibliographic instruction materials, and other campus
documents.  GOPHER at UNF is maintained as a campus system, not just
library services.  It is my understanding that GOPHER is available by
anonymous FTP from boombox.micro.umn.edu in the /pub/gopher directory.

Our CMS client version of GOPHER links (via the INTERNET) to our UNIX
GOPHER server, where the files are actually maintained (more space).
UNF users are able to access GOPHER from their own CMS account,
through UNIX accounts, and through our LUIS gateway.  If you have
GOPHER installed on your machine (CMS or UNIX), the following command
will link you to our documents:
        GOPHER corvair.unf.edu

Bob Jones   (904) 646-2552 : SUNCOM 861-2552 : FAX 904-646-2719
Head, Public Services Division, and Library Systems Coordinator
University of North Florida Library              P.O. Box 17605
4567 St. Johns Bluff Road, South         Jacksonville, FL 32216
BITNET: BJONES@UNF1VM  ::   INTERNET: bjones@unf1vm.cis.unf.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Wed, 30 Sep 1992 17:03:09 EDT
From:         Rob Kairis <RKAIRIS@KENTVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: zero hits
              30 Sep 1992 11:49:00 EDT from <ADLB001@MVS.MCGILL.CA>

Ron,

The problem is the use of the SPACE BAR.  The OPAC will NOT truncate any
search that includes spaces and the end.  For example, the search:

     t=gone with the w...            (... indicates three spaces produced
                                          by using the SPACE BAR)

will probably result in zero hits because the OPAC is interpreting those
three spaces as valid characters.  If the search is REVISED and the spaces
are eliminated with the <ERASE EOF> key, then the search will truely be
truncated and hits will be found.

The 5.0.2 OPAC has gotten a bad rap (mainly because of the new MHI index sort),
however, I do recall that this situation existed in 4.6.

Rob Kairis
Systems Librarian
Kent State University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 2 Oct 1992 10:33:09 EST
From:         "Krista E. Clumpner / Library,
              Head of Tech. Serv." <FACK@NMUMUS.BITNET>
Subject:      Zero hits -- staff mode

>    Well, here's a little mystery which I am almost embarrassed to put before
>    the public, but here goes:
>
>    Staff in Cataloging assure me that under 5.0.2 they are getting many more
>    "no hit" searches in staff mode than used to be the case prior to 5.x, as
>    often as 50% of the time.  The operator will type in a search, e.g.
>    s=federal government (and they know its there, because they are working
>    off of a new headings list or conflict & error detection report), and get
>    no hits; then the operator will shorten the search to jx=federal gov
>    (using the Delete key or EOF) and get one or more hits.  Now, there were
>    no typos or punctuation in the first search, and it was not a
>    particularly long search string.  Another example is 'jx=cooking'
>    resulting in an index beginning with COOKING--ITALIAN, even though an
>    authority record exists for 100::Cooking.  Trying the search again
>    eventually brings up an index beginning with COOKING, they say.
>
>    Has anybody else experienced this sort of 'flakiness' with MHI in staff
>    mode?  There is a legitimate concern here that having to do every search
>    twice to make sure what's in the index is time consuming; and that if
>    this is carrying over into opac, then its a problem for patrons, too.
>    Any thoughts will be greatly appreciated.
>
>    Debbie M.
>
>    Debbie Morrow / Automation Librarian/LIB1

Debbie -

We have seen that happening here last spring with 4.6.  It had to do
with whether we were doing a jx = or a s = search and was connected with
when the MHI was regenerated.  I can ask my staff to refresh my memory
on how the problem was resolved if you want, but since you are probably
in 5.0 I am not sure it is the same problem.  Let me know.

Krista

Krista E. Clumpner
Head of Tech Services & Systems Olson Library Northern Michigan
University

fack@nmumus
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET",DIXON
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Wed, 30 Sep 1992 09:35:00 CDT
From:         Edie Dixon <DIXON@MACC.WISC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: ldm25

We have a set of programs that we use for linking.  I think it's on NOTISPRO,
but if it's not, give a call and I'll get it for you.

Edie Dixon, LIB1
U of Wisconsin
bitnet: DIXON@wiscmacc
phone: 608-262-3525
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: notis-l@TCSVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"notis-l@tcsvm.bitnet"
X-VMS-Cc: BAH
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Tue, 29 Sep 1992 05:01:00 EST
From:         Barbara Hieber <BAH@PITTVMS.BITNET>
Subject:      global changes in 5.0.2

We've just put the global change jobs into production
(LCA600JC and LB890JC) and had very few problems with the
MVS distributed jcl.  We had some questions about the UPSI
switches, but (per NSI) are using the distributed settings
(11000000) successfully.  There was some talk earlier about
a fast/slow switch (bit 5), but that didn't work for us.
I have in my notes that new documentation for the job will
not include any of the options beyond those used in the
distributed job.

The job takes a long time to run, so we've
split the 'real' run into two jobs so the bulk of the work can
be done while the region is still up.  We do run the 'test'
job the day before the real run.   We've only run the job
once in production, but we did a fair amount of testing.
So far, so good.   I believe the documention suggests making
two separate LB890 jobs for test and real and that's definitely
a good idea.  You can include the LB890070 step to print the
NWRECD file after the test.

We're planning to run the job once a week after we determine
the ideal spot on the production batch schedule.  Getting
the test run / review / real run schedule to accommodate
humans, the scheduling package, and the existing batch
schedule is tricky.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Barbara Hieber                       PHONE:        (412) 648-7698 *
* Systems Analyst                        FAX:        (412) 648-1245 *
* University Library System           BITNET:           BAH@PITTVMS *
* G-33 Hillman Library              INTERNET:  BAH@VMS.CIS.PITT.EDU *
* University of Pittsburgh                     Pittsburgh, PA 15260 *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
From: LIBR002@INDST.BITNET (dallas hart)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Subject: Re: Global Changes in 5.0.2
Date: 29 Sep 92 15:14:28 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

tom:
    do you run a test of lb890jc (lb890020) before actually updating?
    do you print data from the 2 work files from lb890020 after your test?
    if you do, would you be willing to share your print code?

thanks for any help you can give.

dallas hart
indiana state university
terre haute, indiana
home of larry bird
(812)237-2599   fax  (812)237-2567
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 28 Sep 1992 16:34:35 EST
From:         R0343@CSUOHIO.BITNET
Subject:      call numbers from copy holdings statements

Could anyone out there explain to me how the  call number in the first co
py statement maps over to all subsequent copies in the OPAC display, even thoug
h there is no call number after each copy in the CHR.  Is this an indexing thin
g? Is it a display thing? Is the call number actually resident in the data stri
ng for each copy even if it doesn't show  in staff mode?


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   Birthplace of Rock &          Gail Junion-Metz
   _____   Roll....      _-!      Cleveland St. University Lib.
  !     --___       ___--  !      Cleveland, OH 44115
  !          ------(*)     !      V: (216) 687-2375
  !          Cleveland     !      F: (216) 687-9380
  !                        !      B: R0343@CSUOHIO
  !       O  H  I  O      !       I: R0343@VMCMS.CSUOHIO.EDU
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Wed, 30 Sep 1992 12:16:14 CDT
From:         "Anne L. Highsmith (409-845-8111)" <K026AH@TAMVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: FYCL screen
              30 Sep 1992 10:17:59 CST from <BNICOL@LIB.AUBURN.EDU>

I can only add more evidence to Beth's problem. Our Ethernet-connected
terminals using tn3270 cannot update the fycl screen, but the
IBM316x's can.

Anne Highsmith
NOTIS Coordinator
Texas A&M U.
From: JTCAVANAGH@SBCCMAIL.BITNET (Janet M Cavanagh)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Subject: Re: Security for PBIL
Date: 29 Sep 92 16:41:42 GMT
Organization: State University of New York, Stony Brook
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: in%"NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


               State University of New York at Stony Brook
                       Stony Brook, NY 11794-3339

                                            Janet M Cavanagh
                                            Head, Circulation/Reserve Department
                                            Library-Circulation
                                            516 632-0771
                                            29-Sep-1992 12:41pm EDT
FROM:  JTCAVANAGH
TO:    "(Beverly Vander Kooy)"              ( _NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET )

SUBJECT: RE: Security for PBIL

I'm intested in this problem. Please send to the list.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Tue, 29 Sep 1992 09:15:28 CDT
From:         Barbara <BAUGHMAN@UTDALLAS.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Can we skip 5.0.2?
              29 Sep 1992 10:06:49 EDT from <pelak@PILOT.NJIN.NET>

The only problem I can see in going from 5.0.1 directly to 5.1 is the
LCRFILE conversion program.  I'm sure that won't be mentioned in the
upgrade instructions or included in the 5.1 release.  Also, be aware that
the MHI regen JCL changed, but that JCL will be included with the 5.1 release.
Of course, holdings records will need to be converted, but that can be
done while remaining at 5.0.1.

Barbara Baughman                *********************************
TECH1                           *                               *
University of Texas at Dallas   *   First right, then rewrite!  *
(214) 690-2157                  *                               *
BAUGHMAN@UTDALLAS.BITNET        *********************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU