HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dansmith@Autodesk.COM (Daniel Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: In need of perl shell
Date: 19 Nov 92 19:16:25 GMT
Organization: Autodesk Inc., Sausalito CA, USA

In <1992Nov18.091018.12064@bsu-ucs> 00btdoty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:

> Hello all....

> I was wondering if anyone would know an ftp site what i could ftp the
> perl shell from?  Our system does not have perl, and i have several
> programs that require perl.  Thanks...

> E-Mail is fine...

	Gee, where have you heard about this?

	Anyways, I'm the author of SoftList, which has a Perl CLI
(among other things).  You can get a beta of this (it's an alpha
of the list handling capabilities) from me: dansmith@autodesk.com

00btdoty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu: I'll send one to you.

	SoftList 3.0 has not been posted yet, and I'm not ready to
upload it for ftp'ing just yet.

				Daniel
-- 
     Daniel Smith, Autodesk, Sausalito, California, (415) 332-2344 x 2580
	      Disclaimer: written by a highly caffeinated mammal
	    dansmith@autodesk.com            dansmith@well.sf.ca.us

Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
From: SEB1525@MVS.draper.com (Steve Bacher)
Subject: Re: How to interpret when the end of piece of mail is reached?
Organization: Draper Laboratory
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:53:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.171359.13685@cas.org>,
lwv26@cas.org (Larry W. Virden) writes:

>In article <GUENTHER.92Nov12192657@amcl5.stolaf.edu> guenther@stolaf.edu (Philip A Guenther) writes:
>
>:If a non-header line begins with "From " then the mailer prepends a
>:">" onto it.  All mail handlers I know do it this way and can handle
>
>
>Unfortunately, not all mail readers do this.  Sun's OW mailtool , when using
 ^^
"Un"???? 

>logging, inserts a header containing the number of bytes in the following
>msg and then leaves the leading From lines alone.  This plays havok when
>one trys to use mailtool within X but is forced to use a text based mailer
>outside of X ...

In a more perfect world, one would only use mailers that didn't muck
with lines starting with "From ".

--
Steve Bacher (Batchman)                 Draper Laboratory
Internet: seb@draper.com                Cambridge, MA, USA
From: 00btdoty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: In need of perl shell
Date: 18 Nov 92 14:10:17 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

Hello all....

I was wondering if anyone would know an ftp site what i could ftp the
perl shell from?  Our system does not have perl, and i have several
programs that require perl.  Thanks...

E-Mail is fine...
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
From: ellis@nova.gmi.edu (Stew Ellis)
Subject: Re: How to clear screen in sh ?
Organization: GMI Engineering&Management Institute, Flint, MI
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 02:09:17 GMT

sherman@unx.sas.com (Chris Sherman) writes:

>In <gerald.722116730@gerald> gerald@torolab4.vnet.ibm.com (Gerald Oskoboiny) writes:

>>menjan@cs.umb.edu (Men-Jan Lin) writes:

>>>echo '^L' does not work perfectly for me.

>>Try "tput clear". (May be AIX-specific, I'm not sure).

>Seems to work under HP/UX, SunOs (and solaris), SVR4 (NEC), dgux, 
>osf1 (alpha box), MIPS, and SCO.

>But it didn't work on NeXT nor DEC.

>Just in case anyone wanted to know...
>-- 
>     ____/     /     /     __  /    _  _/    ____/
>    /         /     /     /   /      /     /          Chris Sherman
>   /         ___   /        _/      /          /
> _____/   __/   __/   __/ _\    _____/   _____/           sherman@unx.sas.com

I may be missing something, but the various solutions offered so far all
depend on the terminal being properly initialized.  /bin/clear and tput
clear both work through terminfo settings.  Sometimes J. Random User gets on
without terminal being set to anything better than network, even though she
is sitting at a perfectly good ANSI or vt100 terminal.  Most terminals which
are not Ansi or vt100 seem to be ADM3a or Viewpoint or close and many of
them understand the same alternate escape sequence.  I simply do:

echo ^[[H^[[2J^L

(all of those have to be entered in a mode that allows quoting of real
escape characters and real Control-L).  

This takes care of probably 90% of the installed base of terminals.  Screw
the rest ;).

--
--                                                        ___________________
  R.Stewart(Stew) Ellis, Assoc.Prof., (Off)313-762-9765  /   _____  ______ 
  Humanities & Social Science,  GMI Eng.& Mgmt. Inst.   /        / /  /  / /
  Flint, MI 48504      ellis@nova.gmi.edu              /________/ /  /  / /
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
From: seong@tellabs.com (Scott Seong)
Subject: Re: Does C-shell have subroutine capability
Organization: Tellabs, Lisle,IL
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 05:01:15 GMT

With C-shell, writing a 'subroutine' is impossible. If you are running
Ultrix 4.2, go with ksh.  It's not that different from csh.
-- 
Scott Seong
seong@tellabs.com
From: dik@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: echo question
Date: 18 Nov 92 23:09:05 GMT
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam

In article <19921117182407SEB1525@MVS.draper.com> SEB1525@MVS.draper.com (Steve Bacher) writes:
 > I haven't seen AIX/370, but I'm sure it'll bomb, being EBCDIC.
 > 
I'm sure you haven't seen AIX/370, it does not bomb, being ASCII.
(Of course a lot of translations are going on on the 370 under AIX.
If I understand it right, when you are hooked up with an ASCII terminal
the data flow is approximately as follows:  enter ASCII code, code
converter converts it to EBCDIC, the system sees it is for AIX and
converts to ASCII, AIX sees it and echos back, the system gets the
character from AIX and converts it to EBCDIC, the converter converts
it back to ASCII before it displays the character on your screen.)
-- 
dik t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj  amsterdam, nederland
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn  amsterdam, nederland; e-mail: dik@cwi.nl
From: hronr@willard.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: newline in bash v1.12 with long PS1
Date: 15 Nov 92 12:51:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: willard.yw70TB1w165w
Organization: Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814

I have a long PS1 in bash to display the command number,
working directory, and more in 4 colors using ansi escape
sequences.  

Roughly:
PS1=<esc>[0;1;35m\!<esc>[32m${PWD}<esc>[35m$ <esc>[33m
(the PS1 is single quoted.)

When I am in a deep directory like /usr/spool/lp/admins/lp/interfaces
and I type a command, bash throws in a newline before I hit <enter>.

For example the command "find / -name "interface*" -print" would
appear as:

584/usr/spool/lp/admins/lp/interfaces$ find / -name "in
terface*" -print

The command executes properly, but I am annoyed by the newline.
I have used similar long prompts in sh, ksh, and csh and they
don't do this.  I also note that in sh, ksh, and csh you can 
backspace over the prompt.  In bash you cannot.

Anyone know a fix or patch for this problem?
p.s. I'm running AT&T V/386 if that matters.
Please email responses to uunet!gatech!dscatl!hrandoz!hronr
if possible.  (Haven't got an internet address or a smart 
mailer yet).  I read this newsgroup if this subject is of
general interest to everyone.


-- 
hronr@willard.UUCP (randy hron)
Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814
From: eddjp@huber.com (Dewey Paciaffi)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: Am I writing to a tty or pipe?
Date: 16 Nov 92 17:06:13 GMT
Organization: J.M. Huber Corp., Edison, NJ
Originator: eddjp@hendrix.huber.com


In article <Bxovv9.MBu@ddsw1.mcs.com>, dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (DWT) writes:
|> eddjp@dinowine.huber.com (Dewey Paciaffi) wrote in <228@dinowine.huber.com>:
|> 
|> | Is there a way to determine from within a Bourne shell script if
|> | the output is being written to a tty or a pipe?
|> 
|> test -t 
|> 
|> or were you thinking of something that test -t doesn't answer?
|> 
|> David W. Tamkin   Box 59297   Northtown Station, Illinois  60659-0297
|> dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com    CompuServe: 73720,1570    MCI Mail: 426-1818

That's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks to all who responded.

-- 
Dewey Paciaffi    
eddjp@huber.com
-- 
Dewey Paciaffi    
eddjp@huber.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
From: christos@deshaw.com (Christos Zoulas)
Subject: Tcsh-6.03 is now available
Summary: for anonymous ftp from tesla.ee.cornell.edu
Keywords: tcsh
Organization: D. E. Shaw & Co.
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 23:33:23 GMT


Hello everyone,

This is the release announcement of tcsh version 6.03.  Tcsh is a
version of the Berkeley C-Shell, with the addition of: a command line
editor, programmable completion and listing, and a bunch of
small additions and bug fixes to the shell itself.

Tcsh now runs on VMS/Posix, OS/2-emx and Coherent, as well as many known
and unknown unix variants :-)

Tcsh-6.03 does not contain any new features, but it has lots of bug fixes
and minor cleanups.

You can grab a copy of tcsh, from 
	tesla.ee.cornell.edu:/pub/tcsh/tcsh-6.03.tar.Z

As always I would like to thank all the people who helped test and debug
all twelve patches of 6.02...

christos
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
From: donn@carson.u.washington.edu (Donn Cave)
Subject: Re: echo question
Organization: University of Washington
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:19:31 GMT

SEB1525@MVS.draper.com (Steve Bacher) writes:

|In article <17935@autodesk.COM>,
|dansmith@Autodesk.COM (Daniel Smith) writes:

|>> >        echo 'first:this=that=other+second:this=that=other+' | tr '=+' '\011\012'
|>
|>> Hardcoded octal ascii is "portable"???
|>> Escaping syntax in tr is "portable"???
|>
|>        OK, name an english-language version of Unix this'll bomb on.

| I haven't seen AIX/370, but I'm sure it'll bomb, being EBCDIC.

Sorry, AIX/370 is ASCII, and the above command works identically on AIX/370,
Ultrix 4.2, and OSF/1.  You're not the first person to assume that ASCII text
somehow produces bit patterns that are distasteful to IBM 370 architecture
computers.

What about non-English-language UNIXes - is there such a thing, that would
fail to do what one would expect with the above command?
Seems like it would be more trouble than it's worth to derange the
character set to do other things with 1 .. 040.

	Donn Cave, University Computing Services, University of Washington
	donn@cac.washington.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
From: jdell@nefertiti.mit.edu (John Ellithorpe)
Subject: Re: How to clear screen in sh ?
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 23:26:25 GMT

On 18 Nov 92 02:44:52 GMT, menjan@cs.umb.edu (Men-Jan Lin) said:
> Nntp-Posting-Host: ra.cs.umb.edu


> echo '^L' does not work perfectly for me.

> Any good ideas ?
> Thanks.

> -Jane

I just use the 'clear' command and it works fine.

John
--

===============================================================================
John Ellithorpe                           | Internet: jdell@maggie.mit.edu
Dept. of Physics, Rm 26-349               | Phone   : (617) 253-3074  Office
Massachusetts Institute of Technology     |           (617) 253-3072  Lab
Cambridge, MA  02139                      |           (617) 236-4910  Home
===============================================================================
From: ircgroup@tacky.cs.olemiss.edu (CSTsao)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: WANTED: Good .kshrc(.env) Shell Scripts
Keywords: ksh, .kshrc, .env, shell, script
Date: 15 Nov 92 20:26:25 GMT
Organization: University of Mississippi


Hi,
       I am trying to learn ksh.  If you have any good .kshrc or .env
scripts that setup many useful environment variables, aliases, and functions
then can you please mail them to me.  Thanks in advance.
>
>

David Tsao
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
From: A. Satish Pai <Pai-Satish@CS.Yale.Edu>
Subject: Find and symbolic links
Organization: Yale University Computer Science Dept., New Haven CT 06520, USA
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 02:39:54 GMT


Hi, everybody!

Is there any workaround/trick/hack/shell-script that can be used to use find in
such a way that it follows symbolic links and descends down them recursively?

I find it annoying that find doesn't follow links. No doubt there are good
reasons for making it operate that way but at least there should have been an
option to override that, IMHO. Why do I want to follow links? Out here, the
"real" directory structure is some hugely complicated thing that only the
sysadmins worry about; what users normally see (such as /usr/bin, /homes, etc.)
are almost all links to something else. I really don't want to run find with
arguments that look like /u6/old/tmp-sys/usr.bin when what I'm thinking of
is (say) /usr/bin. Naturally, if I just specify the names I want, find will
skip entire directories because something at the top happens to be a sym link.

Thanks for any help.

-Satish


--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet: Pai-Satish@CS.Yale.Edu                       | A. Satish Pai
UUCP:     ...!{uunet,harvard,decvax,ucbvax}!yale!pai   |
Bitnet:   Pai@YaleCS                                   | +1 203 432 1217 [Off.]
Mail:     Box 2158, Yale Station, New Haven, CT 06520  | +1 203 776 7069 [Res.]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
From: root@trebor.uucp (Bob Stockler)
Subject: Re: Am I writing to a tty or pipe?
Organization: Bob Stockler
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 01:53:35 GMT

eddjp@huber.com (Dewey Paciaffi) writes:

>In article <Bxovv9.MBu@ddsw1.mcs.com>, dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (DWT) writes:
>|> eddjp@dinowine.huber.com (Dewey Paciaffi) wrote in <228@dinowine.huber.com>:
>|> 
>|> | Is there a way to determine from within a Bourne shell script if
>|> | the output is being written to a tty or a pipe?
>|> 
>|> test -t 
>|> 
>|> or were you thinking of something that test -t doesn't answer?
>|> 
>|> David W. Tamkin   Box 59297   Northtown Station, Illinois  60659-0297
>|> dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com    CompuServe: 73720,1570    MCI Mail: 426-1818

>That's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks to all who responded.

It may have been what you were looking for, but it's not what you asked.

The "test -t" tells if the file descriptor argument to it is a tty or not,
but not if it is a pipe (or file or device or whatever).
From: menjan@cs.umb.edu (Men-Jan Lin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: How to clear screen in sh ?
Date: 18 Nov 92 02:44:52 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Boston


echo '^L' does not work perfectly for me.

Any good ideas ?
Thanks.

-Jane
Newsgroups: comp.unix.dos-under-unix
From: doctor1@cbnewse.cb.att.com (patrick.b.hailey)
Subject: DOS under SysV, how well does it work?
Organization: AT&T
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 20:59:59 GMT

I don't know anyone running DOS under UNIX, I've never seen it done, and can't
think how I could get exposed to it.  I know you folks are all doing it and
want to get on with the business of talking about doing it, so I'll try to
keep it short.

I'm thinking about reconfiguring my computing set-up, and one option I've
considered is Dell or MST SysV on one machine, and not having a DOS machine
at all.  But, I'm stuck needing some DOS applications, and I need performance
to be at least as good as on my 16mHz 386sx w/ 1meg RAM and a s-l-o-w disk.

The DOS applications will be WordPerfect, MicroSoft Flight Simulator, maybe
a few other games and maybe MS-DOS Kermit.

The machine will be, say, a 386/33 with 8meg RAM and a modern, fast HD or two.
I believe Dell UNIX comes with Merge, but I wouldn't mind hearing about the 
other DOS-under-UNIX options.

Will I get good performance out of, say, Flight Simulator if 3 people are
logged in to UNIX at 2400 baud reading news or doing other, simular tasks?
(That is, no compiling or running database programs or other such heavy
duty things.) 

I guess I should also ask how badly running DOS applications can slow UNIX
down.

Also, using the popular DOS emulators, do you get a DOS-like shell and file
system?  What about printing from WordPerfect or at the DOS prompt using
type filename > prn, or copying from the HD to a floppy, can things like 
this be set up to work normally?

I guess what I'm asking is this: My girlfriend is experienced only with DOS.
Once I teach her to log in, will she be comfy, just like she is now sitting in
front of our MS-DOS PC?

A pointer to a book or magazine article dealing with these concerns would
be great.

E-mail would be fine, and I'll share the answers with others via e-mail or
summarize to the net if there's enough interest.

  Thanks awfully,
            Patrick

Newsgroups: comp.unix.dos-under-unix
From: rhb@hotsand.cnet.att.com (54312 - Richard H Brandwein)
Subject: Problems with SunPC output to SPARCPrinter 
Reply-To: rich.brandwein@att.com
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs - Holmdel, NJ
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:09:20 GMT
Originator: rhb@hotsand
Keywords: sparcprinter sunpc 


When I try to print output from any windows applications under
SunPC to my SPARCPrinter, parts of the output are garbled.  It 
looks like it can't find fonts (though I'm generating ps output).
Specifics:

	SunPC 1.0 with 486DX acc card
	SunOS 4.1.2
	Word for Windows 2.0 (among other pc applications that
		don't work)

Any ideas?

-- 
--
	Rich Brandwein		rich.brandwein@att.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc,comp.sys.sun.wanted,comp.sys.sun.admin
From: magoo@baloo (Tim Lentz x255)
Subject: Re: how much memory do i have??
Organization: Precision Visuals, Inc.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 03:20:21 GMT

sweetman@sea.com (Bill Sweetman) writes:
: =-=-=
: all -
: 
: quick question, sorry if its in the FAQ.  how do i tell
: how much memory (RAM) is in my SPARC statoin1.
: running SunOS 4.1.1.
: 
: thanks
: 
: -bill

How about:

	# dmesg | more

Ex. output:

Nov 18 20:18
4SunOS Release 4.1.1 (GENERIC) #1: Thu Oct 11 10:25:14 PDT 1990
Copyright (c) 1983-1990, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
mem = 32768K (0x2000000)
avail mem = 30756864
Ethernet address = 8:0:20:f:85:5b
cpu = SUNW,Sun 4/75

I have 32MB on this Sparc2.

T
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
magoo@pvi.com					Just a fool waiting on the wrong
Manager Computer Networks			block. Putting a little ZEP in 
Precision Visuals, Inc. Boulder, Co		your step.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc
From: thompson@saifr00.cfsat.honeywell.com (Todd Thompson)
Subject: using floppies on a Sun
Organization: Honeywell Air Transport Systems Division
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 15:40:12 GMT


I currently just use DOS formatted floppies on my Sun and just mount
them as a dos partition.  Then I can copy back and forth very easily.

My question is:

  I'm sure that I can use the diskette as a native Sun partition, but
  I don't know how to format it.  Then I could use tar to write to it.
  Do other people use their floppies in this manner?  If so, how do
  you format the diskette?  Is it easier than using the Dos method?

Thanks in advance.

Todd Thompson
Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc
From: stud2@aifbmozart.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de (Norbert Kuck)
Subject: exercises for UNIX-exam
Organization: AIFB, University of Karlsruhe (Baden / Germany)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:56:00 GMT

I am preparing to hold a three-week course on UNIX beginning
next week. I intend to cover basic stuff, sh, vi, awk, sed, 
all the regexp stuff, piping, shell programming, processes,
signals ... The audience are complete UNIX newbies with a bit
of DOS but no programming experience.

My problem is still to find good exercises for the course as 
well as the exam (2 hours written test). So please, if you
have any good ideas on questions, exercises... feel free to send
them to me.

I will summarize to this newsgroup. Thanks in advance...

Norbert Kuck
stud2@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de


Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc,comp.unix.wizards
From: tye@spillman.uucp (E. Tye McQueen)
Subject: Programs to create and apply binary patches?
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:48:26 GMT
Organization: Spillman Data Systems
Followup-To: comp.unix.misc

[Follow-ups to comp.unix.misc]

Any great ideas on how to create a "patch" file of differences between
two versions of a very large *binary* file (executable) so the patch
file could be distributed (via modem) and applied to the many copies
of the old version of the file?

What I thinking of are two programs:
    A good differences program that is not line-oriented.
    A good batch editor that is not line-oriented.

Several of us here have seen such beasts before but none of us can
find a nice Unix solution.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I'm considering converting the binary file to be "line-oriented".  But
it is tricky to put the line breaks so that insertions and deletions of
code do not cause the difference engine to decide the entire remainder
of the files are different.

One scheme is to select a byte value that appears with some fairly
reqular frequency in the executable and transpose that value and
newline.  The hard part is finding an apporpriate value (if one even
exists).

But I suspect that there is Unix-capatible source code for non-line-
oriented differences and batch editing programs if I just knew where
to look.  I tried "archie" but that works best if you already know
the name of what you are looking for.  Checking for things containing
"dif" or "patch" doesn't seem to find anything but differences and
patches of other packages.

Thanks,
 tye@spillman.com                         Tye McQueen, E.
----------------------------------------------------------
 Nothing is obvious unless you are overlooking something. 
----------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc
From: phardie@nastar.uucp (Pete Hardie)
Subject: Re: The Problem with UNIX
Organization: Digital Transmission Systems, Duluth, GA.
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 14:42:24 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.093952.18999@news.uni-stuttgart.de> skok@itwds1.energietechnik.uni-stuttgart.de (Holger Skok) writes:
>I don't know whether that would help much. My main gripe with UN*X (and
>its CLI) is a lack of standardization. I primarily use the computers at
>work to run finished programs and their standardization is still another
>story. But even just considering UN*X itself it is a damned
>nuisance to have to remember that tar's command line arguments must not
>be preceded by '-' since '-' is an argument in itself, while most other
>commands I use regularly DO require a '-' to precede the arguments. 
>Then sometimes it is possible to group the arguments all together as in
>'dump -0oucbdsf ...' while other commands barf at such combinations.
>All this is on the same flavour of UN*X, mind you.

Only some of this is the fault of UNIX.  The rest is the fault of those who
wrote the command code.  The Berkeley UNIX extensions (additions?) are all
post-initial UNIX developments, and therefore do not necessarily follow the
same design ideas as the initial UNIX work.

>If a computer is to be a help, not a problem in itself it has to be EASY
>to setup, maintain and take care of. Apps should install themselves and
>REMOVE themselves as well, if necessary. (I don't want to have to clean
>up all the symbolic links an app might create on installation). User
>interface has to be consistent - similar things done in similar ways.
>Standardized interfaces between programs should exist (and not by the
>dozen) so that programs can communicate easily...

Very true.  Also applicable to every OS, not just UNIX.


-- 
Pete Hardie:  phardie@nastar  (voice) (404) 497-0101
Digital Transmission Systems, Inc., Duluth GA
Member, DTS Dart Team           |  cat * | egrep -v "signature virus|infection" 
Position:  Goalie               |
Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc,comp.unix.questions
From: Cford@debug.cuc.ab.ca (Conan Ford)
Subject: Archivers for UNIX
Reply-To: Cford@debug.cuc.ab.ca (Conan Ford)
Organization: The Magic BBS (Debug Computer Services)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 92 01:35:03 GMT
Followup-To: comp.unix.misc 
Keywords: 
 
 

 
I'm looking for any of the following archivers for UNIX: ZOO, ARC, LZH,
ARJ, and ZIP.  Are any of the above available through anonymous FTP?>
-- 
 Conan Ford 1:134/9,201:5500/9,1:134/21    | Save our forests - ask for
 Cford@debug.cuc.ab.ca                     | plastic bags :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 I do not represent Debug Computer Services.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc