HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mckernan@RUMBA.SEAS.UPENN.EDU (Robert L Mckernan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: EAGLES WILL GO 15-1 AND WIN THE SUPERBOWL AND KILL THE REDGIRLS
Date: 15 Oct 92 16:25:42 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


	It will be a great game in RFK this weekend. Two things the Redskins
have going for them:
	
	1. Play action passing. They do it as well as anyone.
	2. Their pass rush shouls be effective against a weak Eagles
           offensive line.

	If Rypien can get time to throw, I see the Skins winning.

	Prediction:    Washington   21
		       Philadelphia 17

						Rob
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chill@cbnews.cb.att.com (daniel.a.miller)
Subject: Re: Browns MUST win against Steelers
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 11:06:52 GMT
Keywords: Win or be assured of a high draft pick

In article <dchou.718597226@husc8> dchou@husc8.harvard.edu (David Chou) writes:
>cfh@cbnews.cb.att.com (chuck.himmelspach) writes:
>
>>	A win against Pittsburgh sets up a potential respectable season i.e.
>>              8 or 9 wins.
>
>>	A loss against Pittsburgh paves the way for a 4 or 5 win season and
>>              a fairly high draft pick.
>
>>What do you think...Browns fans?
>
>The point is moot, because the Steelers will chew them up and shit them out
>even browner than their name suggests :)
>
>							-Dave


	Well Dave, I am a Browns Fan, as much as it hurts me to say so
these days. I agree, the Browns WILL lose. As I predicted before the 
season started:

	1.) Bernie WOULD get hurt, that to the OFFENSIVE Line.

	2.) Browns final season record 4-12, most likely 3-13.

	3.) Browns draft Michigan Quarterback, Elvis Gerbak in first
	round of the Draft.

	4.) Browns do NOT draft any Offensive Lineman in next years draft.
	(WHY DISRUPT A GOOD THING, Right ART!!!) NOT!

- Dan
GOOOOOOOO BROWNS!
(Hello First Round Pick! Draft 93') 


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rscott@ra.csc.ti.com (Roderick Scott)
Subject: ***Correct*** Two Different Games
Organization: Texas Instruments
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 20:21:25 GMT

It's Amazing How Fans For The Cowboys, And Fans For The Eagles Saw Two
Games In One...

Cowboys Fans States:
They Beat Themselves ...

Eagles Fans States:
It Was The Defense That Caused Them To Beat Themselves..
                                       ^^^^
Let's Hear From Some Non-Cowboys/Eagles Fans On Which Game They Saw..

This Should Settle The Argument....

-- 
Roderick Scott|This Line Intentionally Left Blank|Texas Instruments
rscott@ti.com |				         |Fax (214) 995-0403
From: un032221@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: SchmEagles Fans
Date: 15 Oct 92 04:42:18 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <92037@netnews.upenn.edu>, satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
> Well, true to my predictions, the fans at Veterans Stadium truly proved 
> themselves to be the biggest bunch of brain-dead idiotic morons on the face
> of the planet.  Among the general objects pelted down onto the field: bottles,
> food, heads of lettuce, beer cans etc.  Man, are you folks so obnoxious that
> you don't realize that ... oh, say someone in the seats may get hit??
> Next time, I'll bring my oozie ...
> 
> satish nair
> 
> PS to all those people who wanted the Cowboys to loose because you couldn;t
>    stand the woofing ... you folks OBVIOUSLY aren't familiar with the typical
>    Eagle fans (each and every one of the 4 years I've lived in Philly, they've
>    hyped the Eagles are the ONLY Super Bowl contenders).

Cowboys fans are worse.  "America's Team" has the whiniest bunch of fans in the
league.  Whenever the Cowboys lose, but have a generally winning team, it's
"bad luck" (no it's not just this eagles loss that makes me say this, it's a
long standing epidemic) or a fluke.  When the Cowboys have a generally losing
team there is no such thing as a Cowboy fan.  Where did you guys go in Landry's
last, and Johnson's first season?  I couldn't find you guys.  Now of course
EVERY Cowboy fan deny's being a bandwagon jumper, but I noticed that many of
the guys that used to say "America's Team is the best!" started saying "The
forty niners are the best!"  Oh, I'm sure there are exceptions, and of course
whoever answers this post has been a fan for life, not just when the going was
good.  *wink*  
	Get this.  When the Cowboys were 7-9, my friend  (now a super Cowboy
fan, just as he's always been *wink*) did not know who coached, who
quarterbacked for, or who was the starting tailback for the Cowboys.  Now he
and all you others know, but in '89 and '90 you guys were scarce.  It is
apalling.
	-Skins fan that has one thing to say: "WAY TO GO MONK!!!"
From: tehyang@aludra.usc.edu (Teh Kao Yang)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Eagles lose: Where were the safeties?
Date: 11 Oct 1992 13:25:51 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

In article <douthit.718834370@scofflaw> douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit) writes:
>We will see you in Texas in a couple weeks.
>
>>                                EAGLES 27
>>                                K.C.   10
>
>
>K.C. just beat your beloved Eagles.  So much for your ranting predictions
>and your 16-0 season.  We will beat you in Texas just like last year.

What happened to the Eagles secondary? I've never seen wider receivers get
THAT wide open!! Was is Izel "Toast" Jenkin's fault? Did Eric Allen play?

-Tehkao
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles Class Acts ... NOT!
Date: 9 Oct 1992 16:15:49 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <92309@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
>- Aikman's shoes come off. The nice Iggles DE picks it up and then tosses it
>  away.
>- The O line is called for false-start. Nice Clyde Simmons starts clapping in
>  their faces.
>- And oh who could ever forget Andre Waters' (surprise) knack for getting into
>  tiffs with the bad Cowboys.
>
   To all three of these things, I say big deal! Jeez, name one team that has a
   D lineman who would see the shoe, pick it up and say "Here you are Mr.      
   Aikman, I hope we haven't inconvenienced you tonight." 

   I'd also like to see any team with a D lineman who wouldn't get on the case
   of a O lineman who jumped offsides. This is football, not tiddly winks.
   Intimidation is a big part of the game.

   As for Waters, every team has a guy who instigates his share of fights. I've
   seen Dallas' Bates get into quite a few.        

   Satish, aren't you a Giants fan? If you are, you should know first-hand of
   incidents like these happening every week with LT and the Giants used-to-be
   great defense. I guess since the Eagles are kicking everyone's ass, the
   rest of the NFC East fans are really mad. Still, these idiotic "Dallas had
   bad luck," and "Philly has mean players," posts are getting ridiculous.

   --salty
From: aj639@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Cox)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: AAFP Predictiomns for week 6
Date: 7 Oct 1992 23:39:32 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aj639@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Cox)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I have written a program that predicts winners of NFL games.  It is for
the Amiga and is called AMOS American Football Predictor aka AAFP.

For week 5, AAFP was ?? out of 11.  Not too bad.  Only week 5.  I think
that it will improve as the season goes on and more statistics are available
to analyze.

For Week 6, AAFP predicts:

Miami (#1!!!!)
Giants
Steelers
Forty-niners
Bills
Oilers
Jets
Saints
Redskins
Chiefs
Pick'em for Seattle at Dallas


Looks like AAFP picks a couple of upsets.  Chiefs over Eagles and Redskins
over Broncos.  Also, it couldn't pick a winner between Dallas and Seattle
so this could be an upset.

Mike
P.S.  Redskins over Broncos is an upset because the Dedskins suck!!
-- 
Okay, look for AmoNER Disk #4 on: (And, AMOS PRO is coming SOON!)
ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (128.174.5.59) in /amiga/amoner
nic.funet.fi (128.214.6.100) in /pub/amiga/programming/amos
From: crobbins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Chris S. Robbins)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: A dream I had.
Date: 12 Oct 92 16:23:06 GMT
Article-I.D.: ringer.1992Oct12.162306.8589
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio

I am scared.  Last night I had this dream that some guy named Aaron that
I go to school with started posting these obnoxious letters on the net
saying that the Eagles were gonna go undefeated and win the Super Bowl.
Also, he wrote in all caps, which was really annoying, and he talked
trash about my Cowboys.

But the Eagles lost to Kansas City yesterday, proving that the Eagles
don't have the leagues best defense.

So it was just a dream, right???



Chris Robbins                   "The minute you close your mind to new ideas,
Sigma Tau Gamma Fraternity       you lose grasp of what life is all about."
The University of Texas at San Antonio has adopted UT fb until we get a team.
Roadrunner Basketball- 1991 TAAC Champions, 1992 Southland Conference Champions
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: reams@crchh462.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Cary Reams)
Subject: Re: Revenge week? 
Keywords: Cowboys bills
Reply-To: reams@bnr.ca
Organization: NT/BNR
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1992 13:05:44 GMT

In article <1992Oct07.120601.4414@bnr.ca>, jeffh@crchh317.BNR.CA (Jeff Hammond) writes:
|> 	Since what were considered two of the top teams got blown
|> out last week (Bills & cowboys), does anybody feel sorry for the
|> raiders or seahawks? Who do the bears play? How do raiders & seahawk
|> fan's feel?
|> 	Just some idle musings while trying out new posting sw.
|> 
|> 

Bears, Lions, The Bays, Vikes and Chargers have an open date
this weekend. 

Chargers are going to lose all that momentum.


-- 
Cary W Reams | "...truth demands to be declared, even if it is
NT/BNR/MTXVO | ugly and unethical."                - Nietzsche 
---------------------------------------------------------------
My opinions are not necessarily shared by Northern Telecom/BNR. 
---------------------------------------------------------------
From: jseo@quick.EBay.Sun.COM (Philip Jinsoo Suh)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: EAGLES WILL GO 15-1 AND WIN THE SUPERBOWL AND KILL THE REDGIRLS
Date: 17 Oct 92 00:04:34 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: quick.ebay.sun.com


Are you trying to say your bird will go 15-1 this year?
I am really not sure if bird's fans have any confidence in their team.
But one thing I am really sure is....  Another bird's fan will claim that
"Eagle will go 14-2 and............" after they loose another game if I
did not post this. One lost soul who does not know anything may still
do that. WHO KNOWS? 


MOTTOs from somewhere!!!

Last week; Eagles will go 16-0 and ........
This week; Eagles will go 15-1 and ...........
Next week: Eagles will go 14-2 and ..............
           .........................................
           ...........................................
           .
           .
           .
Final week: Eagles will win superball NEXT YEAR and we will shut our mouth.



Last claim sounds more reasonable to me.




Confused reader!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand)
Subject: Re: Cunningham's QB rating
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 19:28:41 GMT

jd> Joe Dakes
dw> Dan Welch
jn> Jae H Nam

jn> There are many who think it's A FLUKE that Cunningham leads the NFL in QB
    rating. There are some that think his stats will drop. I disagree.

dw> Well, you're wrong, sorry.  His rating vs. the Cowboys was around 51.  And
    it's certainly not going to be in the 140-range against K.C., either; per-
    haps Monsieur Strand can fill in that detail.

  Cunningham's stats for the KC game, and the season so far:

  Week 6:
                    Atts  Comp   Cmp%  Yards  AvgGn  TDs TD %  INT  IN% RATE
  ----------------  ----  ----  -----  -----  -----  --- ----  --- ---- -----
  R. Cunningham       27    16   59.3    168   6.22    2  7.4    2  7.4  71.2

  Cumulative:
                    Atts  Comp   Cmp%  Yards  AvgGn  TDs TD %  INT  IN% RATE
  ----------------  ----  ----  -----  -----  -----  --- ----  --- ---- -----
  R. Cunningham      118    80   67.8    994   8.42   10  8.5    3  2.5 111.3

  This still leads the NFL, however.

dw> It is dropping, and will continue to do so -- Cunningham is only human,
    and there is no way he could maintain a 145 rating over 16 games. I don't
    even think he'll maintain the 123 rating he had after the Cowboy game.

  Bingo. It's nearly impossible to keep a rating over 100 for an entire season.
  The records for season rating belong to Joe Montana in 1989 (112.4), Milt 
  Plum, Cleveland, 1960 (110.4) and Sammy Baugh, Washington, 1945 (109.9). Very
  few QBs can manage it. Cunningham may be able to, but the odds are against
  it.

jd> I have no idea what is considered a good QB passing rating.  

  66.6 is perfectly average, 90+ is considered very good, 100+ is excellent.

--
Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power)
Subject: Re: Cowboy *POWER* Notes 
Reply-To: patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Richardson, Tx
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 20:30:27 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.183248.28650@leland.Stanford.EDU>, blokhead@leland.Stanford.EDU (Darren Pakying Lum) writes:
|> In article <1992Oct13.135033.1740@bnr.ca> patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power) writes:
|> >
|> *Stuff deleted*
|> >
|> >      ACE was traded to the Raiders for what is speculated to be a 4th
|> >rounder that could escalate to a 3rd based on playing time.  IMHO, this
|> >was a great move for ACE.  LA likes to go deep, so he can use his "NFL's
|> >Fastest Man" speed.  Plus, no knock on Marinovich, but he doesn't throw
|> >as hard as Aikman does.  I think this gave Wright alot of trouble.  Wright's
|> >vastly improved over his rookie year, this move will make him better.
|> 
|> Anyone know if Jimmy Smith played on Sunday against the Seahawks?
|> NBC cut the local feed after the 3rd quarter.

     Yeah, he had one pass thrown his way and it bounced three feet in
 front of him.
 
|> 
|> -Is J. Smith fully recovered from the broken leg?
     yes
|> -Is he fast enough to be the speed burner to replace Ace?
     His speed is nowhere close to Ace's, but he has good
     speed  (4.3 - 4.4 40, i'd have to doublecheck though)

|> -Think he will contribute more than Ace has?
|> 
        Undoubtedly.  He's a much more polished receiver than ACE.
   He got plenty of reps at Jackson State.  He'll probably need some
   strength conditioning.  The hardest thing for a rookie WR is 
   breaking up the bump-n-run coverage in the NFL.


|> About Alvin Harper....what is his problem?  He should be
|> getting more receptions.  Is he having a hard time getting
|> open or is Aikman just not throwing to him?  Think he'll
|> develop soon?
|>
          He still struggles a bit at the line.  IMHO, its a 
   combination of factors.  He may not have Aikman's complete
   confidence/attention.  Some DB's really give him fits.  He's
   improving, esp his confidence.
 
|> thanks and
|> 
|> Go Cowboys!!!!
|> Darren
|> 
|> 

-- 
If I could, I'd slow the whole world down*I'd bring it to its | Pat Power
knees*I'd stop it spinnin' round*But as it is, I'm climbing   | My opinions only
up an endless wall*No time this time, No time at all          |
       - The Police, "No Time This Time"                      | Da Boyz are back!!


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gary@colossus.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand)
Subject: Re: AFC's best in 1985
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 22:44:25 GMT

cm> Chris Martel

cm> The Pats defense, special teams, and running attack beat Miami. It was not
    a case of 'The rignt bounces of the ball'. The Pats forced 6 turnovers in
    each of their 3 playoff games leading up to the SB.

  Yep, the Pat defense played well for those three games. Too bad they played
  so poorly in the SB. 

cm> Concerning that Miami victory over the Bears, combine McMahon's absence
    from the game (or had limited snaps), his replacement (Tomzak?) did
    not play well, a loud Orange bowl crowd, and Marinos quick release and 
    you have a victory. 

  A 38-24 victory? What happened to the vaunted Bears defense? They managed
  to shut down New England and win 20-7 the 2nd week of the season. In any
  case, none of the factors you mention have anything to do with the Bears'
  defense, which is what really cost them the game.

cm> Marino's quick release might have made the SB a little closer, but the
    best team in the AFC in 1985 was either the Pats or the Raiders.

  A toss-up between Miami, the Jets, the Pats, the Broncos and the Raiders,
  I'd say, since all did 11-5 or better, Miami having an edge since they beat
  Chicago.


--
Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: keithg@boi.hp.com (Keith Glasson)
Subject: Re: Don't give up on the Bills.
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 10:28:11 GMT
Organization: work
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

Imran Qureshi (iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu) wrote:
: I feel really sorry for the Raiders secondary after the whupping they shall
: occur on Sunday.  The Bills have a history of having a bad defeat followed by
: a severe thumping of the following opponent (does anyone remember the merciful
: 42-6 win over Indianapolis last year?).  
: 
: Even the quiet James Lofton hinted on a local news interview that the Bills
: were looking to light up the scoreboard (and they haven't in the past?).
: 
: I don't expect the Bills to establish the run and set up the pass this week.
: Look for them to open it up with some long balls--something they've been
: waiting to do all year.  Thomas should get a lot of action as the Bills build
: a 21 or so point lead in the first half.  I think this will also be the week
: Carwell "superstar waiting to happen" Gardner gets the ball.  This guy is the
: next Okoye/Word at 235 lbs and reasonable speed.  He would be a 1000 yard
: rusher on any other team (after all, the Bills are the #1 rushing team in the
: NFL again).

___________________________________________________________________

	Well, thanks for sharing that fantasy with us. Now that the
	Bills have been outscored 57-13 in the last two games, and
	been pummeled, thrashed, stomped and humiliated by two teams
	that you had absolutely no respect for, maybe you'll shut up
	for awhile and take your fantasies elsewhere.


	-keith

+++++++++++++++++++++++
From: jain@bartok.CES.CWRU.Edu (Ashish Jain)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: TV (Detroit viewing area) on Sunday 18th Oct. 1993
Date: 13 Oct 92 13:03:45
Organization: Computer Engineering and Science, CWRU, Cleveland OH.
NNTP-Posting-Host: bartok.ces.cwru.edu

Hi:

It is very likely that Packers at Browns game on 18th Oct. will be
locally blacked out. Since Lions and Packers are in NFC-C, I thought
it was probable that the game might be on TV in the Detroit viewing
area. My brother is in Farmington Hills, MI and I was planning to
visit him if the game is on TV there.  CAN SOMEONE FROM THE DETROIT
VIEWING AREA PLEASE TELL ME WHICH GAMES THE NETWORKS ARE PLANNING TO
SHOW ON SUNDAY? Lions play on Thursday this week.

Since the network's schedule might be tentative, I would also
appreciate if someone could give me the phone numbers of the two
networks so that I can make myself 100% sure before I begin my 2 1/2
hour drive.

Thank You
--
Ashish Jain
jain@alpha.ces.cwru.edu
From: d_jackson@fennel.cc.uwa.oz.au
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: The Alltime Greats needed.
Date: 9 Oct 92 22:36:48 +0800
Organization: University of Western Australia
NNTP-Posting-Host: fennel.cc.uwa.edu.au

G-day footballers

I have a major request for all you major hometown fans. I have this computer
game (NFL) by Kanomi that allows me to make up my own teams.Kinda like fantasy
league. What I am trying to do is make my teams THE ALL-Time GREAT teams for 
each city.The games has all teams and leagues setup. What I need is the ALL-TIME
greats for each Team. I have done the Bears being from Chicago BUt having trouble
remembering the other greats from other teams. My request is for people from
other teams to send me a roster of what u would consider your teams alltime 
great players (all positons if possible) i.e best running backs ,for Bears I 
have Sayers,Payton and Anderson. If u could send the name and numbers,it would
be MUCH appreciated.I would like to go back as far as the 70's,my era.
Who was tyhe greatest runner for Miami? Best quarterback Griese or Marino,best
recievers,.I have the MOST trouble remebering the defenses for each team. I have 
picked some of great from the current rosters but need some of the oldies that
have retired. Any help is helpful?
 
^ DJ-CHICAGOAN DOWN UNDER                      BULLS 91-92 CHAMPS !!!!!           ^
^   "I'd rather light a match than curse the darkness"                         ^
^               GO WHITESOX'S/CUBBIES/BEARS/ILLINI/DEPAUL                                                               ^
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Hail to the Redskins
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 05:56:55 GMT

In article <23800@optima.cs.arizona.edu> curtis@optima.UUCP (Curtis E. Dyreson) writes:
>From article <1992Oct13.182115.18014@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>, by lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor):
>> Based on the Broncos' weak showing against quality teams away from Mile
>> High, they don't belong anyway.
>Yeah, any team that has lost to the Broncos away from Mile High in the last,
>oh, let's say 4 years, just doesn't belong anyway (belong where?).  
>Let's just label such a team a total loser for that period.  Even
>worse, if they happened to lose to the Bronocs without Elway at the helm.
>The mind boggles at just what such a team would be called.  Totally inept,
>perhaps? Thanks for clearing that up for me Ed.

You hit it right at the Bull's eye. Totally inept, couldn't have said it 
better. I was even an advocate of "Joe must go" at that time.

The first thing I said after that dismal showing on Monday nite: Rypien
was a loser. He could rack up all the yardage but couldn't make the clutch
plays that separate the winners from the losers. Witness:

1) In the Monday nite opener, he overthrew Art Monk on 3rd down in 
   the Redskins's last drive of the game. The Redskins punted. Phil Simms
   led the Giants to the game winning FG at the gun.

2) In week 2, after the Redskins blew a 20-point lead to the Eagles and
   trailed 42-37, he fumbled the ball in the Skins' last possession.

3) In the Bronco game, after a DB intercepted a Kubiak pass and returned it
   inside the 10-yard line, he couldn't punch it in. The Skins settled for
   the FG and the 4-point was the losing margin.

Fortunately, the Redskins have seen better times since then. On the
other hand, the Broncos, a Super Bowl team in 89, has been going downhill
since.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro