HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: wildman@athena.mit.edu (Timothy Worsley)
Subject: Article on Hong Kong films in NYRoB
Reply-To: eprice@sql.sybase.com
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 03:00:44 GMT

[Sorry for reposting, but I forgot to add rec.arts.movies when posting
this originally (to alt.cult-movies); I think this might be of
interest to a wider readership than the obsessive freaks on a.c-m
since it provides a nice introduction to what some have been babbling
insanely about (to the annoyance or perhaps indifference of most I'm
sure) for a while...  Enjoy!]

The September 24, 1992 issue of _The New York Review of Books_ has a
great article on Chinese and Hong Kong films.  It is by Geoffrey
O'Brien; according to the Contributors list he "is an associate editor
at the Library of America and the author of _Dream Time_" and "is
currently at work on a book about film, _The Phantom Empire_".

Here's the list of films discussed:

RED SORGHUM (Zhang Yimou, 1987)
HORSE THIEF (Tian Zhuangzhuang, 1986)
THE BIG PARADE (Chen Kaige, 1985)
YELLOW EARTH (Chen Kaige, 1984)
RAISE THE RED LANTERN (Zhang Yimou, 1991)
FISTS OF FURY (Lo Wei, 1972)
SHANGHAI BLUES (Tsui Hark, 1984)
PEKING OPERA BLUES (Tsui Hark, 1986)
A CHINESE GHOST STORY (Ching Siu-ting, 1987)
A BETTER TOMORROW (John Woo, 1986)
BOAT PEOPLE (Ann Hui, 1982)
ROUGE (Stanley Kwan, 1988)
A TERRA-COTTA WARRIOR (Ching Siu-ting, 1990)
ONCE UPON A TIME IN CHINA (Tsui Hark, 1991)
A TOUCH OF ZEN (King Hu, 1975)

He mentions others of course, in passing, like EASTERN CONDORS, GANGS,
GOD OF GAMBLERS, LONG ARM OF THE LAW, CODE NAME COUGAR, THE KILLER,
PROJECT A, MR. VAMPIRE, SWORD OF DOOM (so it's not HK, sue me, but
it's a great flick!), and even quotes a couple of lines of dialogue
from A BETTER TOMORROW II!

Some books that are cited:

_Perspectives on Chinese Cinema_ (BFI Publications, 1991).
_The Asian Film Industry_ (Univ. of Texas Press, 1990).
_Cine Kung Fu_ (Paris: Editions Ramsay, 1988).
special Hong Kong issue of "Cahiers du Cinema" (September 1984).

By the way, the Asian Cine-Vision program that he mentions ("Cinema of
Blazing Passions: Hong Kong Films in the 80s") is currently at the
Museum of Fine Arts in Boston.

Also, he doesn't mention but should have, that there is currently a
theater up by Lincoln Center (New York City) playing the films of Hsu
Feng (eg A TOUCH OF ZEN).

Anyone want *real* trivia?  John Zorn was composing a musical piece
called "Hsu Feng" (yes, named after the actress) about five years ago.
I don't know what happened with it, though...

(OK, so that was a digression.  Sorry.)

Ciao,

-Ed (not Tim), eprice@sql.sybase.com (not wildman@...)
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27106 alt.cult-movies:7617
From: pfeiffer@nmsu.edu (Joe Pfeiffer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: <None>
Date: 8 Sep 92 17:59:44 GMT
	<sbarnhar-040992151951@morril6t-10.micro.umn.edu>
	<1992Sep4.180743.1@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu>
	<1992Sep5.013622.3819@ee.ubc.ca>
Organization: NMSU Computer Science

In article <1992Sep5.013622.3819@ee.ubc.ca> rsemenof@ee.ubc.ca (SEMENOFF ROBERT) writes:

   In article <1992Sep4.180743.1@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu> bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole) writes:
   >In article <sbarnhar-040992151951@morril6t-10.micro.umn.edu>, 
   >sbarnhar@mailbox.mail.umn.edu (Dr. Barnhart) writes:

   >I'm so sick of being called a simp and a pretentious idiot because my friends
   >and I enjoyed Barton Fink/Naked Lunch/Wild At Heart/Prospero's Books/etc.

   What about making rec.arts.movies into two newsgroups ?
   (Has this been discussed before?)

Not only is this newsgroup already divided into seven groups (groups
at my site with either ``movies'' or ``cinema'' in the name), but you
posted to two of them!

Sounds like you want to post to rec.arts.cinema...

-Joe.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: boylan@pi.eai.iastate.edu (Terran Boylan)
Subject: Meg Ryan's nose
Keywords: Nose, Nasal
Organization: Engineering Animation, Inc.
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 22:54:26 GMT

Anybody besides me notice that Meg Ryan scratches her
nose in the same peculiar way (with the back of her
hand) in the movies _When Harry Met Sally_, _Joe
Versus the Volcano_ and _The Doors_.

I just saw _Prelude To a Kiss_, and I didn't notice
any nose-scratching there.  (I hope that's not a
spoiler.)

Terran Boylan
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: ballard@panther.adelphi.edu (Terry Ballard)
Subject: re:Mountains of the Moon
Organization: Adelphi University Swirbul Library
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 15:04:08 GMT


   It seemed to me that Mountains of the Moon was based on an excellent 
novel called "Burton and Speke" that was published about 10 years ago.  In 
any case the book was better than the film.
                
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
| Terry Ballard      |    ballard@panther.adelphi.edu           | 
| Systems Librarian  |    or ballard@auvax1.adelphi.edu         |
| Adelphi University |    Garden City, New York, 11530          | 
| 516-877-3547       |    Fax: 516-877-3592                     |
|                                                               |
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
*  "Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time - *
*  I think I've forgotten this before."                         * 
*                                        Stephen Wright         *
*                                                               * 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston)
Subject: Re: Best War Movies?
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 19:49:04 GMT

In article <1992Sep7.024532.1146@cos.com> cooper@cos.com (Gary Cooper) writes:
>It's a 1955 movie starring, <drum roll!> - Gary Cooper - the one
>with Martin Sheen was something like "The Courtmartial of Private
>Slovik" or something like that.  Very good movie - about the only
>american excecuted for cowardice in WWII.  Billy Mitchell was the
>Army Air Corp visionary who not only predicted (during the 1920's)
>that WWII would happen, he even, I believe, predicted the japanese
>attack on Pearl Harbor.... 

Indeed, he predicted that the attack would come on a Sunday morning.

However, I've been less impressed with Billy Mitchell's prediction since
learning that Homer Lea had predicted a Japanese attack on Hawaii along
with a pincers attack on the Philippines in _The Valor of Ignorance_
written in 1909.  In 1912, the year of his death, Lea predicted a 
Russian invasion of Afghanistan.

-- Herb Huston


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: frankm@microsoft.com (Frank R.A.J. Maloney)
Subject: Re: ENCHANTED APRIL
Date: 09 Sep 92 17:21:26 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Windows/DOS Users Ed Group

In article <1992Sep8.150646.11936@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> fod@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Frank O'Donnell) writes:
[deletion]
>
>It was indeed a nice little movie, and managed to achieve a
>lot on what were evidently somewhat slim resources.  At times,
>however, it had to me the unmistakable look of skimping that
>betrayed what was apparently its low budget (i.e. they couldn't
>afford a period train, so they used a shot of a light coming
>through mist and something that looked sort of like the interior
>of a train car to suggest the train trip; also, the interiors
>of the "castle" did not correspond well to the exterior shots
>of the villa in which the story was supposed to have taken place).
>

I don't know what you mean by interiors and exteriors not
matching. The film was shot sequentially at Castello Brown,
inside and out.

>I was trying to remember what else I might've seen Michael
>Kitchen in (the musician who owns the villa).  Any jogged 
>memories?
>
For two things, Kitchen was in OUT OF AFRICA and THE DIVE.

-- 
Frank Richard Aloysius Jude Maloney
	"Well, I'm a little muddled." -- Glinda
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: To all who have seen Blade Runner: The Director's Cut
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 02:43:19 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.004841.27036@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> sdt8s@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Steve Tilson) writes:
>Our local cinema was to have obtained a print of this film, but
>when their shipment arrived last week, it just wasn't there.
>
>To all of you fortunate enough to have seen it:
>You are all overprivileged scum-dogs and don't you forget it.
>
>And if you have our print you better give it back, suckers.

Nyah, nyah, nyah.  We saw it and you didn't. :-)



--
"It's a Drake's Coffee Cake....  I have another one, but I'm saving
it for _later_."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: hardcle@elof.iit.edu (Cleveland Hardin)
Subject: Sources for Premiere Back Issues?
Organization: Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 04:55:42 GMT

I thought I had every issue of Premiere until I recently discovered that
the April '92 issue was missing.  If anyone knows of someplace where I could
get a replacement copy please let me know.

E-Mail replies appreciated in addition to any post you might make.

Thanx.

-- 
C.A. Hardin      |hardcle@elof.iit.edu       |"Men Rule.           | Being
PO Box 805862    |hardcle@iitvax.bitnet      |Rap Sucks.           | weird
Chicago, IL 60680|chardin@nyx.cs.du.edu      |Eat Fatty Foods."    | isn't
USA              |bw286@cleveland.freenet.edu|-Oliver Wendell Jones| enough
From: cb366@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark B. Bendiksen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Film with the least actors
Date: 7 Sep 1992 19:25:21 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


Jann VanOver writes:

>wwr@calmasd.prime.com writes:
>>keith@cco.caltech.edu (Keith Allan Schneider) writes:
>>> wildcat@niwot.scd.ucar.edu (Wes Wildcat) writes:
>>>                                    
>>>>     I think in the movie Sleuth(sp) only Laurence Olivier and Michael
Caine.
>>> 
>>> What about the Muppet Movies, and The Dark Crystal?  No actors.
>>                     
>>       Dark Crystal w/David Bowie & Jennifer Connely?  That Dark Crystal?  I
>>think Dave & Jennifer will feel slightly insulted.
>>                                   
>Ding Dong, You're Wrong!  Dave and Jennifer were in Labyrinth!
                                  
>In a different vein, I believe that muppeteers also appreciate being 
>called actors.

Besides, the muppet movies had plenty of "real" actors.
Remember the first one. It had cameos from tons of stars,
ranging from Steve Martin to Orson Welles..........


Mark B. Bendiksen
cb366@freenet.cwru.edu
-- 
"If we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto,
 We'll just be bogus, too."-- Dr. Jeff Spicolli
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: matt@centerline.com (Matt Landau)
Subject: Re: STAR WARS SNEAKER
Organization: CenterLine Software, Inc.
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 00:22:46 GMT

In <Bu1DHz.I5o@news.cso.uiuc.edu> rnmg1200@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (A Lady and her Walrus) writes:
>>In one of the battle scenes in one of the starwars movies when they're
>>showing the armada I've heard a rumor that one of the ships is actually
>>a sneaker

>It's in Return of the Jedi. 

No, it isn't.  It's a myth.  You can discover this by going down to
your local videodisc emporium and buying or renting a copy of the
letterboxed version on laserdisc, then doing a frame-by-frame scan
of all of the battle scenes.  In one of them, you'll see about 2 
frames in which one of the ships, moving at high speed and blurred
as it passes by, looks vaguely sneaker-like, but when examined 
closely in stop-action, it's clearly just a ship.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jon@cyclone.MITRE.org (J. E. Shum)
Subject: Re: Highlander III.
Originator: jon@cyclone
Organization: The MITRE Corp. McLean Va.
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 21:32:15 GMT


In article <5854@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>, mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner) writes:
> From article <JEFFT.92Sep7235334@navigator.mit.edu>, by jefft@athena.mit.edu (Jeff Tang):
> > In article <1992Sep8.014101.28079@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mblaser@nyx.cs.du.edu (Fox) writes:
> >    I heard that in Highlander III a band of immortals who escaped the carnage
> >    in Highlander I are woken up.  Turns out that they were accidentally
> >    buried by a landslide/avalanche and have been sleeping all this time.
> 
> > Well, it already sounds better than highlander 2.
> 
> No, it's just as just as inconsistent with Highlander as Highlander 2
> was.  (Unless they took their heads off before they went to sleep.  Or
> perhaps they had them separated by the wonder surgeon from planet Fuzz
> and now carry them around in their hands.)


Actually, it could work if the story takes place sometime after
Heather's death and before MacLeod comes to America.  It could 
be kind of a sideways sequel.  Anyone else like this idea?
-- 
<jon@mitre.org>|--------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------| Libertarian Party  
  Andre Marrou    Nancy Lord for  | 1528 Pennsylvania Avenue SE  (202)543-1988
  for President   Vice-President  | Washington, DC 20003         (800)682-1776  
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: c8643631@cc.newcastle.edu.au (I AM NOT ON DRUGS. HONEST. I WAS BORN THIS WAY.)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 10:41:34 GMT

>>In article <1992Aug31.215528.29891@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> mlh@eddy.austin.ibm.com (Mike Haskell) writes:
>>>
>>> What is the most embarassing movie you have ever seen?  (What I mean by
>>> embarassing, is that you feel absolutely miniscule when the lights come
>>> up and you HAVE to walk out of the theater with every other bonehead
>>> who bought a ticket to this turkey).  Movies on video don't count as
>>> your stupidity is hidden by the walls of your house. :-)
> 

Easy. 'Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves'. I found this the most boring piece of
tripe I have ever seen on the big screen. The only reason I stayed until the
very end was because I knew some big-name actor played the part of King Richard
but I couldn't remember who it was. (I also have an aversion to wasting money.
I paid, dammit, I'm going to watch it all) Needless to say, Sean Connery's 30
seconds were not worth the wait. I know I'm in a minority, but I was bored from
the moment the first person spoke.
From: revpk@cellar.org (Brian 'Rev P-K' Siano)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: "Blade Runner" Dr. Cut Review
Date: 13 Sep 92 17:58:09 GMT
Organization: The Cellar BBS and public access system


        People expecting a substantially different version of "Blade Runner" 
will be mildly disappointed. The only changes are the excision of harrison 
Ford's Chandler-esque narration, a brief dream of a unicorn, and the excision 
of the "happy sunny day" ending.

        However, this isn't to say it's not worth watching-- the change are 
worth re-seeing the film for, especially since the film's main audience has 
been people who saw it on home video. Seeing the film on a big screen again-- 
especially with that first showof the future Los Angeles-- is an experience 
not to be missed. 

        The loss of the narration changes the film, and for the better; 
rather than being forced to track the film as a straight police thriller, and 
react to the drama on the narration's prompting, the audience is drawn into 
the film far more seductively. One pays attention a lot more. It is, with 
this one small change, a _far richer and compelling_ film.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian "Rev. P-K" Siano                                  revpk@cellar.org
Servo: "Dianetics, by L. Ron Hubbard."
Joel:  "Why is my life messed up? Page 74."
Servo: "When will this movie end? Page 155."
Crow:  "How much money can we get out of Tom Cruise? Page 85."

                                       "Mystery Science Theater 3000,"
                                       during a volcano scene in
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: sws8n@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Stefan William Sittig)
Subject: Re: TRIVIA:  Potemkin quotat
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 18:04:38 GMT

In article <716168445.AA00000@tdkt.kksys.com> Douglas.Johnson@f31.n282.z1.tdkt.kksys.com (Douglas Johnson) writes:
>
>PN>I have been for some years been accumulating a list a movies which quote or
>PN>pastiche (part of) the very famous "Odessa steps" sequence from Eisenstein's
>PN>masterpiece "The Battleship Potemkin". (To jog memories:
>PN>soldiers descending
>PN>the steps abreast, firing into the crowd as they go; a man
>PN>with glasses shot in
>PN>the eye; the baby carriage rolling down the steps)
>
>PN>The Untouchables (Brain de Palma)
>PN>Brazil (Terry Gilliam)
>PN>The Monitors (U.S., about 1970, director unknown to me)
>
>PN>I have this feeling that I used to know of another one, but have forgotten.
>
>PN>Can anyone add to this list?
>
>I believe that there is also a sequence in Woody Allen's Love and Death.
>
>___
> X SLMR 2.1 X "No One touches my brain"
>
> * Origin: Dark Knight's Table (1:282/31)

There is a scene in MILLER'S CROSSING that shows a shot of four(?) mobsters
climbing steps and all you see in the shot are their feet climbing the steps
in a ryhthmical fashion, like the soldiers on the Odessa Steps in "Potemkin".
					-Stefan
From: ballerup@diku.dk (Per Goetterup)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 15 Sep 92 08:03:51 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, U of Copenhagen

gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley) writes:

=>Waynes World,    or     Batman Returns

=>   God was I embarrassed I went to see these turkeys.

Hmmm.... Haven't seen Wayne's World The Movie, but if it in any way
resembles the shows on Saturday Night Live, then it should be pretty
cool...

I rather liked Batman Returns... It was a worthy sequel to the
original movie, and the film-noir/gothic mood in it is only surpassed
by Bladerunner (what else?). And Michelle Pfeiffer (sp?) as
CatWoman... Uhhhmmm..!!!!

=>+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
=>| Gary Bradley        |   "You receive a love letter from me and |
=>| ORACLE Corp, UK     |                  you're f*cked forever!" |
=>| Edinburgh, SCOTLAND |        - Frank Booth ("Blue Velvet")     |
=>+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
=>| "God damn the censor man"                                      |
=>+----------------------------------------------------------------+


-- 
| Per Gotterup                        | "The most merciful thing in the    |
| Student, DIKU (Dept. of Comp. Sci.) | world, I think, is the inability   |
| University of Copenhagen, Denmark   | of the human mind to correlate all |
| Internet: ballerup@ask.diku.dk      | its contents."  - H.P. Lovecraft - |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: saeed@watson.ibm.com (Saeed Jaffer)
Subject: Re: uniformity of European opinion (Was Re: bob roberts
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 14:36:20 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In article <1992Sep7.182543.6165@cbnewse.cb.att.com>, gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart) writes:

|> Do you suppose this is the reason for the tremendous economic success of
|> Europe as compared to the US -- this single-minded uniformity of opinion
|> that all Europeans apparently have?

Hunh?!  The "single-minded uniformity of opinion that all Europeans apparently
have"?!  I think Europe's multiple confused response to Yugoslavia in the past
year is indication enough that this is far FAR from the truth.  I know this
doesn't exactly belong here, but I HAD to speak!


--saeed jaffer        
saeed@watson.ibm.com  
saeed@athena.mit.edu  




			
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: steven@syacus.acus.oz.au (Steven Malikoff)
Subject: Re: What movies do to cities...
Organization: ACUS Australian Centre for Unisys Software, Sydney
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 00:42:52 GMT

frankm@microsoft.com (Frank R.A.J. Maloney) writes:
: Then there's the extreme case of having one continent make
: do for another, as in POINT BREAK where the southern "Australian"
: coast was obviously the Oregon coast on a blustery day,
: equally obvious, I'm sure, to anyone who has spent time on
: either coast.

Yep. I guess they just parked the cars (plus a Land Rover or two, thrown in
for good measure) on the left side of the street for this. ...And the
conifers! I haven't been to the real Bell's Beach, but I've seen it on tv
during surfing comps and it's just a sandy hill (might have had a steep bluff
as well). However, the worst shock was the accents.

Steve Malikoff.
steven@syacus.acus.oz.au
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: schumach@convex.com (Richard A. Schumacher)
Subject: Re: Holden's Eyes (was Re: Blade Runner...(SPOILERS))
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 00:09:42 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

>talking about.  It isn't a 'lame' idea to me.  The whole idea of the
>subtelness of the glowing eyes is what makes it so simple.  It isn't a gaudy
>subtitle stating "This is Holden; he is a replicant", it's just there for
>those who see it.

Glowing eyes is subtle? Sheesh. Why not just put the replicants in black hats,
or maybe Nazi uniforms.
From: kachun@astro.as.arizona.edu (Ka Chun Yu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Blade Runner Director's Cut (SPOILERS)
Date: 14 Sep 92 00:58:04 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

In article <1992Sep13.210459.9572@alc.com> woolf@alc.com writes:
>Another interesting flaw: There's a shot in Sabastian's apartment
>building; Deckard has killed Pris; the Rutger Hauer replicant has
>broken a couple of Deckard's fingers; Deckard has lost his gun.
>Deckard goes running through a large room before he ends-up out on the
>ledge; as he runs though the room, there are lots of shadows racing
>across the wall as he runs along the wall; look closely, two of those
>shadows are those of the camera crew; you can see them through the
>whole shot, but the shot is only a few seconds long.
>

_BR_ is full of these little errors.  When Pris settles in front of the
Bradbury building to wait for J. F., look at the movie theater marquee
across the street.  It changes when J. F. shows up.

Also:  *  When Deckard climbs onto the roof of the Bradbury building, depen-
	  ding on whether you have a close up or a long shot, it's either
	  raining or it isn't.
       *  Deckard has bruises on his face from his fight with Leon when he
	  buys the vodka, before he fights with Leon.  This was due to the
	  transposition of the original scenes, which had the fight with
	  Leon before Deckard meets with Bryant.
       *  The Esper computer shows the same on-screen coordinates three
	  separate times, when Deckard is supposed to be moving all over
	  the place in the picture.

[stuff deleted]
>
>Anyway, the _Blade Runner_ director's cut it cool.  Go see it on the
>big screen.

Ditto.

>
>Bobby
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Bobby Woolf                             Ascent Logic Corp.
>    woolf@alc.com                           San Jose, CA
>----------------------------------------------------------------------


--
*Ka Chun Yu                 * "Deputy dog dog a ding dang depa depa deputy     *
*kachun@as.arizona.edu      *  dog dog a ding dang depa depa . . ."            *
*                           *                         --"Don't Let's Start"    *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies