From: wolfone@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Patrick Chester)
Newsgroups: alt.activism
Subject: Re: FREE-ENERGY Technologies
Date: 5 Oct 92 04:03:54 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

In article <1992Sep29.180411.1409@cnsvax.uwec.edu> mcelwre@cnsvax.uwec.edu writes:

And now an announcement from Robert McElwaine, the world's greatest writer
of pulp science ficiton. If only he knew..... :)

)                            FREE-ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES
)          
)               For decades, the various energy companie$ have been 
)          COLLUDING with each other, [and probably also with the 
)          national and international banker$, governments, news media, 
You would help your case if you would $TOP using "$" symbols for the letter
"s". It is a very cheesy attempt to allude to the greed you attribute to these
organizations. If you think they are greedy add this adjective in front of the 
organization's name: greedy. Easy isn't it? Also, STOP using WORDS with ALL
CAPS to AMPLIFY your statements. It is also VERY cheesy and gives the IMPRESSION
to the reader that you are SCREAMING into their FACE like some BOORISH drunk.
Do you UNDERSTAND ME ?! Good, then I will stop imitating you.
)          "scientific" establishment, and "education" systems], to 
)          successfully ignore or even SUPPRESS several kinds of "FREE-
)          Energy" technology.  Government intervention is needed to 
)          stimulate research, development, and mass production of these 
)          technologies. 
Trust no one save Robert here. Who has miraculous dodged death squads, bomb
attacks and even worse: audits to bring us this vital information. Yeah right.
Oh Robert, has it occured to you that the government lets you post this drivel
not due to your amazing ability at evading their attempts to eliminate you but
because *you* have been brainwashed into making these claims to divert public
attention from real energy solutions? No, it's impossible? *Hah!!* You have
been *programmed* by them! Why else would you deny it since they would put
that into your programming, no? Stop choking with anger, Robert. You pulled
the same "programming" claim before in sci.space and I flamed you for it. I
just decided to let you feel what it's like to run up against it.
)          
)               Free-Energy devices probably do not create energy, but 
)          rather tap into EXISTING natural energy sources by various 
)          forms of induction.  Unlike solar or wind devices, they need 
)          little or no storage capacity, because they can tap as much 
)          energy as needed whenever needed. 
From where? Another dimension? Or your free-floating, chargeless electrons?
Have you ever heard that acronym from Robert Heinlein? TANSTAAFL? Oh yeah,
he's part of the conspiracy too, isn't he? 
)          
)               For example, at least three U.S. patents (#3,811,058, 
)          #3,879,622, and #4,151,431) have so far been awarded for 
)          motors that run EXCLUSIVELY on PERMANENT MAGNETS, apparently 
)          tapping into energy circulating through the Earth's magnetic 
)          field.  The first two require a feedback network in order to 
)          be self-running.  The third one, (as described in detail in 
)          "Science & Mechanics" magazine, Spring 1980), requires 
Never heard of this mag. Where can I find it?
)          critical sizes, shapes, orientations, and spacings of 
)          magnets, but no feedback.  Such a motor could drive an 
)          electric generator or reversible heatpump in one's home, year 
)          round, FOR FREE.
Tanstaafl.
)          [Complete descriptive copies of U.S. patents were $1.00 each 
)          from the U.S. Patent Office, correct 7-digit patent numbers 
)          required.  Or try getting copies via a university or public 
)          inter-library loan dept..]. 
Thanks for the data. Too bad I have a History exam to study for.
)          
)               A second type of Free-Energy device, such as the "Gray 
)          Motor" (U.S. Patent #3,890,548), the Tesla Coil, and the 
)          unpatented motor of inventor Joseph Newman, taps electro-
)          magnetic energy by induction from "Earth resonance" (about 12 
)          cycles per second). 
From *the* Grays? Oh, why didn't you say so? I can't speak against that since
their science is so far ahead of ours. NOT! 

Why not use the Spaceship Yamato's Wave Particle Engine?
)          
)               During the 1930's, an Austrian civil engineer named 
)          Viktor Schauberger invented and partially developed an 
)          "IMPLOSION TURBINE" (German name, "ZOKWENDLE").  As described 
)          in the book "A BREAKTHROUGH TO NEW FREE-ENERGY SOURCES", by 
)          Dan A. Davidson, 1977, water is pumped by an IMPELLER pump 
)          through a LOGARITHMIC-SPIRAL-shaped coil of tubing until it 
)          reaches a CRITICAL VELOCITY.  The water then implodes, no 
<gulp> er, *how* critical is *critical*? As in "critical velocity" or "mass"?
)          longer touching the inside walls of the tubing, and drives 
)          the pump, which then converts the pump's motor into an 
)          electric generator.  The device seems to be tapping energy 
)          from that of the Earth's rotation, via the "Coriolis effect", 
)          LIKE A TORNADO. 
You mean Hurricane? Besides, if you take away energy from Earth's rotation won't
that slow it's rotation even further than what the Moon is already doing? Don't
want to tidal-lock the planet, do you?
)          
)               A fourth type of Free-Energy device is the "McClintock 
)          AIR MOTOR" (U.S. Patent #2,982,261), which is a cross between 
)          a diesel engine (it has three cylinders with a compression 
)          ratio of 27 to 1) and a rotary engine (with solar and 
)          planetary gears).  It burns NO fuel, but becomes self-running 
)          by driving its own air compressor.  This engine also 
)          generates a lot of heat, which could be used to heat 
)          buildings.  [David McClintock is also the REAL original 
)          inventor of the automatic transmission, differential, and 4-
)          wheel drive.] 
If it builds up heat, then there has to be friction. If there is friction, there
has to be something to keep it from stopping. This requires outside energy.
)          
)               Crystals may someday be used to supply energy, as shown 
)          in the Star Trek shows, perhaps by bombarding them with a 
)          beam of particles from a small radioactive source. 
Unfortunately, Robert was last seen getting "noogied" by a tall, burly man
with odd bumps on top of his head. The man was wearing a yellow uniform that
had an oddly familiar looking badge over the left breast. He was repeatedly
shouting to Robert:"You have plagarized from the Creator. REPENT!!" :)

Seriously, I thought crystals were just for healing the body and soul. ;)
)          
)               One other energy source should be mentioned here, 
)          despite the fact that it does not fit the definition of Free-
)          Energy.  A Bulgarian-born American Physicist named Joseph 
)          Maglich has invented and partially developed an atomic FUSION 
)          reactor which he calls "Migma", which uses NON-radioactive 
)          deuterium as a fuel [available in nearly UN-limited 
)          quantities from sea water], does NOT produce radioactive 
)          waste, can be converted DIRECTLY into electricity (without 
No neutrons? Or does it use He3 mined from the Moon? You know, from the super
secret Russian Moonbase that has the Neutral Particle Cannons that everybody
knows about. Remember that article you posted in sci.military about that base?
)          energy-wasting steam turbines), and can be constructed small 
)          enough to power a house or large enough to power a city or 
)          spaceship.  And UN-like the "Tokamaks" and laser fusion 
)          monstrosities that we read about, Migma WORKS, already 
)          producing at least three watts of power for every watt put 
)          in.  ["New Times" (U.S. version), 6-26-78, pages 32-40.] 
There already is a working fusion design. It uses deuterium and helium-3 and
sends out protons as a waste product; no problem since you can stop those w/
magnetic fields. I don't believe it is called Migma so I'll be merciful this
time and assume Robert was confused.
)
)
)     --------> Free-Energy technology is in much the same situation now 
)          as aviation was ninety years ago.  At that time, everybody 
)          "knew" that a heavier-than-air machine could not possibly 
)          fly.  It would violate the "Laws" of physics.  All the 
They said it was impossible to find an engine powerful enough to make a 
HTA machine fly. I.e. an *engineering* impossibility, not against the Laws
of Physics. Funny you should put Laws in quotes. Last time I checked, Newton's
Laws were still working perfectly.
)          "experts" and "authorities" said so.  Most present "experts" 
)          and "authorities" today say the same things about Free-Energy 
)          technology.  Now we take airplanes for granted (except when 
)          they crash).  But Free-Energy technology has the added 
Maybe they are too pissed off at your arrogant manners when you go up into 
their faces and insult them for not immediately believing you. 
)          problem of some very powerful VE$TED INTERE$T$, who are 
)          trying to prevent its use by means of such tactics as the 
)          FALSE ISSUE of "perpetual motion", wide publicity of hoaxes, 
Obviously not a believer in the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Oh yeah, Robert
didn't approve of it.
)          and even VIOLENCE against the inventors. 
Get real. If the government or other corporations got wind of this, they'd 
beat a path to the inventor's door and either buy or steal the patent. You
could make a lot of money with these. Not to mention the military uses of
such items. No emmisions to trace, etc.

Congradulations, you nearly went a whole page w/o using cheesy $ signs to 
replace s.
)          
)               In terms of economics, the market has FAILED.  Inventors 
)          do not have enough money and other resources to fully develop 
)          and mass-produce Free-Energy equipment, and the conventional 
)          energy producer$ have no desire to do so.  The government is 
)          needed to intervene.  If the government does not intervene, 
Oh yeah. Bring the same government that conspired to hide all this, not
to mention started the first space war against the Russian Cosmoshperes, into
the picture. Those that don't subscribe about to sci.military will not have
any idea what I'm talking about, and I have no time to explain suffice that 
the Cosmospheres are another gem Robert posted on that newsgroup.
)          then the total supply of energy resources from the Earth will 
)          continue to decline and will soon run out, prices for energy 
)          will increase, and POLLUTION and its harmful effects 
)          (including the "GREENHOUSE EFFECT") will continue to 
)          increase.  
Ever hear of SPS?
)          
)               The government should SUBSIDIZE research and development 
)          by Inventors and universities, subsidize private production 
)          (until the producers can make it on their own), and subsidize 
)          consumption by low-income consumers of Free-Energy hardware. 
Do you have any financial stake in this? 
)          
)               The long-range effects of such government intervention 
)          would be wide-spread and profound.  The quantity of energy 
)          demanded from conventional energy producer$ (coal mining 
)          companie$, oil companie$ and countries, electric utilitie$, 
)          etc.), would drop to near zero, forcing their employees to 
)          seek work elsewhere.  Energy resources (coal, uranium, oil, 
Great. Massive unemployment. Where will they work? 
)          and gas) would be left in the ground.  Prices for 
)          conventional energy supplies would also drop to near zero, 
)          while the price of Free-Energy equipment would start out high 
)          but drop as supply increases (as happened with VCR's, 
)          personal computers, etc.).  Costs of producing products that 
)          require large quantities of energy to produce would decrease, 
)          along with their prices to consumers.  Consumers would be 
Maybe. What about the cost of materials to make them. Or has someone invented
the replicator? Must've happened during "Time's Arrow" :)
)          able to realize the "opportunity costs" of paying electric 
)          utility bill$ or buying home heating fuel.  Tourism would 
)          benefit and increase because travelers would not have to 
)          spend their money for ga$oline for their cars.  Government 
)          tax revenue from gasoline and other fuels would have to be 
)          obtained in some other way.  AND ENERGY COULD NO LONGER BE 
)          USED AS A MOTIVE OR EXCUSE FOR MAKING WAR. 
Oh drat. You mean we will have to fall back on religion, political views, 
territorial rights, natural resources, food, population pressures, and plain
boredom as excuses to start wars? Praise McElwaine!! Peace is at hand!! ;>
)          
)               Many conventional energy producer$ would go out of 
)          bu$ine$$, but society as a whole would benefit greatly.  It 
Right. The conventional energy producers would most likely monopolize the
source and get the government to let them. There would be money in this and 
as you know money is what they crave. Hence your attempts at being clever by
using a $ in place of the letter s. Pathetic.
)          is the People that government should serve, rather than the 
)          big corporation$ and bank$. 
True. But I've come to distrust political types like yourself who decide to 
work for the People without asking them if they *want* you to help. I didn't
ask you to save me from this conspiracy. Hence my third law of politics:
"People's groups rarely stay that way for long."
)          
)
)               UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this 
)          IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED. 
I, however, reserve the right to comment on your Information.
You aren't as clever and righteous as you think you are. I should know. I found
that out about myself years ago. 
Hint: This means that most people will not believe you because you have no real
proof. Not because they've been programmed that way. ;)
)
)
)                                   Robert E. McElwaine
)                                   B.S., Physics, UW-EC
Look at it this way, you can always put my name in your kill file. That would
stop me from hurting your feelings everytime I comment on your work.


-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick Chester            |"The earth is too fragile a basket in which to keep
wolfone@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu |  all your eggs." Robert A. Heinlein
Politically Incorrect      |"The meek shall inherit the earth. The rest of us
Future Lunar Colonist      |  are going to the stars." Anonymous
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.activism,news.admin