HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sher@umbc.edu (Sherri Crain)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Nadine/Harley/Frank
Date: 23 Jan 1993 13:17:50 -0500
Organization: Univ. of MD, Baltimore County
NNTP-Posting-Host: umbc4.umbc.edu

In article <1702@emdeng.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> jreeves@emdeng.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Jacki.A.Reeves) writes:
>Can someone please give me a reason that Harley would keep the information
>about her father from Frank even though she is FURIOUS with Nadine for
>keeping it from them all along????  "It's a soap" is not a valid reason.
>

  Okay,I've come up with a few (somewhat far fetched) ideas...

1) This one isn't really that far fetched.  Nadine is very good at
manipulating Harley.  She always had been...she's been real good at
manipulating Frank in the past too,like the time he didn't tell Billy
about something (I forget what).At any rate,maybe Nadine was once again
sucessful at planting just enough doubt in Harley's head that it would
be the "right" thing to do to tell Frankie right now.  Afterall,Harley
was saying somehting to Mallot about Frank having admired their dad
so much.

2) Why didn't Harley tell Frank everything she knew thus far while she
was in D.C.?  She was waiting until she had more facts?!  That's not
a good enough reason either.  Maybe she wants to find out if "Buz" is
dead or alive before she ruins Franks idea of his dad.

3) Maybe Harley feels Frank would be too hurt by this fact.  Who
knows?  Or,maybe she's afraid if Frank goes off on Nadine at this
point,something will happen to hurt the baby and Harley doesn't
want that on her head.

By the way...not too long ago someone mentioned there might be a
problem when they brought Frank Sr. into the picture because then
we'd have 2 Franks.  They took care of that problem right away,didnt'
they..with the "Buz" nickname.  Funny Nadine never mentioned she'd
called Frank Sr. that in the past.












-- 

     Lack of planning on your part                 -sher   
doesn't justify an emergency on my part     sher@umbc3.umbc.edu
From: jm5p+@andrew.cmu.edu (Judi Mancuso)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Future speculation (SPOILER)
Date: 25 Jan 93 08:01:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.EfN2g2K00iUxA5ImBU
Organization: Student Employment Office, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

>
> 
>I read in one of the rags (SOD maybe?  The Feb. preview?) that Ed will
>seek comfort from "a surprising source."
> 
>How about Jenna???
> 
>Liz
>lizb@banyan.com
>"Heaven is a stranger place than the one I left behind."
>	- Sarah McLachlan
 
I was thinking the EXACT same thing!  If Jenna goes to comfort
Michelle-----it would be a real "suprising source" that is for sure!  
Judi
From: hawthorne!bill@uunet.UU.NET (Bill McDaniel)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: ATWT:  Holden's a slut too
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 15:23:47 EST



 JolessJo said:

>Geez, you guys!  Quit trying to use logic on this situation!  IOAS, and the

>powers-that-be are simply trying to manufacture a plot device severe enough
to
>split up the world's most boring couple (presumably so they can do
something
>more interesting with Cal).  The relationship between these two doesn't
generate
>enough sparks to break them up any other way.

>- JlJ
>
And Jeep said:
> 
>and *Yes*, my patience is running out with LilaTurd too.  
>I think Pal otta tell those 'indian-givers' ;-) if they want their
>land back, they can *buy* it back.....*and* spring for all the wasted 
>exploration costs to boot! 
>...and *then* he should tell Lila to hit the road.........and persue
ConRail or
>something......
>
So my question is, did the ConnerBabe/Pal rumor ever get confirmed?  
Its starting to look like Barely-Holden-ItInHisPants is going to go after 
Conner.  Or at least she's in the running.  Do we have a pool on that
yet.  Possible contestants:
theSlut--sure thing for him, and fun possibilities
FakeEasily--another sure thing
ConnerBabe--she deserves better
Angel--something's got to ruin her chances with Seth
LylaBird--think about it, she'll be on the rebound, she likes younger men
          and she's his physical therapist
MarshaMarshaMarsha--probably a long shot at this point
BaByDoLl--NO!  He can't have my BaByDoLl!!


>...but one more comment anyway:
>RoseHand sure did look cute yesterday.....:-)
As always (swoon...)

On to other subjects:
I haven't seen Moses-Noah or whatever the kid's name is yet, but I'm sure 
that if he's like all soap babies he looks like he came out of the womb
ready to eat solid food.  But I think I'd rather have that than these
soap people dragging newborns out of the hospital and into a cold studio
where they pull 'em around and make 'em cry for the camera.  Just MHO.

By the way, I did sleep with Easily, and I have the shot record to prove it!

McDano

*  Bill McDaniel                       "Its a shame when the new           *
*  bill%hawthor.uucp@uunet.uu.net       president has to wear rented       *
*  A cold misplaced Southern boy        bowling shoes."                    *
*  Y'all need some heat up north        -Mike Tirico, ESPN                 *
*  As far as I can tell there's no one who cares about my opinions anyway  *
From: htatkow@thearc.East.Sun.COM
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: The Cooper Family (prediction)
Date: 25 Jan 1993 14:05:54 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc. - BDC
Distribution: world
Reply-To: htatkow@thearc.East.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: thearc.east.sun.com


Anybody think that when "Buzz" shows up it will be he who is the "bad guy" and
we'll find that Nadine has been covering for him all this time by painting him
as this wonderful guy?  Nadine will wind up looking much more sympathetic.

Helene
From: patricia@pete.uucp (Patricia Peterson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Idiotic Plot Twists
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 15:36:35 -0800
Reply-To: patricia%pete%nicmad%astroatc.uucp@spool.cs.wisc.edu
Distribution: na
Organization: My system in Madison WI

In <1993Jan24.132935.5144@cbnewse.cb.att.com> shellys@cbnewse.cb.att.com (michelle.sulski) writes:
>In article Rob. Taylor writes:

>>Anybody know if we've seen the last of Helen Marsh?
> 
>Helen will return and try to perform an exorcism on her
>daughter the eve of her big Wedding day.   Gloria will go
>ballistics and Stuart will go to prison for finally loosing
>his self-contained animosities toward Helen by strangling her
>to death.  Then once Stuart's in prison and Gloria is in the
>mental ward, Adam will start visiting her portraying himself
>as Stuart. Gloria will remember nothing about the exorcism/
>murder and will agree to marry Stuart.  They marry, Gloria
>becomes pregnant and bares Damien, Omen XXXXXXX.II.  Adam
>reveals he is Adam, and Gloria reveals she's really Helen
>reincarnated.

>?~~? ShockWaved Shelly

>Wonder Why(s):	The AMC writers haven't thought of this type
>		of storyline before, surely it has "potential"...


I love this, ROTFL

Patricia


-- 
Patricia Peterson   (608)273-4573
Inet: patricia%pete%nicmad%astroatc.uucp@spool.cs.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: drs1002@ucs.usl.edu (Schwartz Donald R)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Trivia #14
Date: 25 Jan 93 20:41:50 GMT
Organization: Univ. of Southwestern La., Lafayette

In article <37373.sheila.mcmahon.3@nd.edu> sheila.mcmahon.3@nd.edu writes:
>Here is Trivia #14...
>
>
>1) What famous actor played the part of Tim Werner, a young alcoholic who
>   was in love with Morgan Richards?
>
was it kevin bacon?

>
>2) Elizabeth Taylor's son once played a part on GL. What is this actor's
>   name and what part did he play?
>
he played jackson fremont -- i forget his name..

>
>3) Cloris Leachman's son is an actor on GL. What is his name and what
>   character does he play?
>
alan michael?

>
>4) What role did JoBeth Williams once play on GL?
>
>
>5) Who originated the role of Jackie Marler?
>
>
>6) Brian Dennehey's daughter once played a part on GL. What was her name and
>   what character did she play?

she was the original blake -- back when blake was a blond.

>
>
>7) What role did James Earl Jones once play on GL?
>
>
>8) What role did Cicely Tyson once play on GL?
>
sharina?

>
>9) What role did Billy Dee Williams once play on GL?
>
>
>10) Who originated the role of Reva Shayne Lewis?
>
kim zimmer
>
>
>Enjoy,
>Sheila
>

--donald
...still waiting for susan piper to return!!!

--                                                 __  __   ______   __     
Donald R. Schwartz         drs1002@ucs.usl.edu  | /\ \/\ \ /\  ___\ /\ \    
                          ds@gator.cacs.usl.edu | \ \ \_\ \\ \___  \\ \ \___
Center for Advanced Computer Studies            |  \ \_____\\/\_____\\ \_____\
University of Southwestern Louisiana            |   \/_____/ \/_____/ \/_____/ 
Organization: Junior, English, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 15:20:52 -0500 
From: Dawn Marie Neuhart <dn1g+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: SB: Davies vs Thomson
Distribution: usa

Lane Davis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I feel bad for him though, he hasn't had much luck on TV or movies since
he left.  He is a great actor, and Thompson is pretty good, much better
than Terry Lester, but Lane surpasses them all.

-dawn
From: patricia@pete.uucp (Patricia Peterson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: update for 01/18
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 17:21:48 -0800
Reply-To: patricia%pete%nicmad%astroatc.uucp@spool.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: My system in Madison WI

In <gfLK0Oi00iUzM1FygH@andrew.cmu.edu> Jennifer Allyson Turner <jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>>>6) What is Trevors Bachelors degree in?
>> 
>>Trevor has a degree?  I wasn't aware that was a requirement for 
>>mercenaries.  :)  Does Nat have a degree?

>Isn't she an RN

This doesn't mean she has a degree.  She could have graduated from a
hospital based program which is three years.  She could have an
Associates or a Bachelor's degree if she went to college.

Patricia


>Jenn

-- 
Patricia Peterson   (608)273-4573
Inet: patricia%pete%nicmad%astroatc.uucp@spool.cs.wisc.edu
From: msccc@Jane.UH.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: Jagger
Date: 21 Jan 1993 20:57:55 GMT
Organization: University of Houston
Reply-To: msccc@Jane.UH.EDU
NNTP-Posting-Host: jane.uh.edu

In article <1jn2euINNgjl@menudo.uh.edu>, msccc@Jane.UH.EDU writes:
>  A friend of mine wants to know what happened to Jaggar... Is he off the 
>show?? Is he coming back? or where did he go??  
>
>Thanks
>
>--julie

OOps, I'm sorry I made a big mistake,  please forgive me....

--julie
From: lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu (Liz Fox)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Can it get any worse?
Date: 26 Jan 93 13:37:09 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.QfNQgZ_00WBMI7cEBt
Organization: Office of the Dean - CFA, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

On 25-Jan-93 in DOOL: Can it get any worse?  
user EFS6ET1@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU writes:

[Some great Carpetstain rantings deleted]

>And, finally, with apologies to Vix, I hate this Roman/John/Marlena

Hey what about me ??? :)

>triangle.  I do think Dee is better with Drake than with Wayne, BUT
>I think this story makes Marlena look like an idiot.  It might have
>worked when she first came back.  But now, it seems like the whole
>story has fallen from the sky.  John chose IckyB over Marlena, Marlena
>swears she loves her husband, now that Icky is dead all bets are off?
>I don't think so.  But that's IMHO.
> 
Razz - I agree - this WOULD have been better back in August of
1991...but it didn't happen.  TPTB had the world in their hands at that
point and what do they do - they SCREW it up...as usual.  They only
paired Drake and Icky when they knew that Marlena was returning.  As
Stinky has ranted and raved over and over and over in the past - I still
cannot believe that Icky was the great love of Drake's life.  It was
Marlena.  Even when he was with Diana - Marlena was never far from his
mind.  And that was the problem this time around.  They do those GREAT
scenes on the pier when Marlena came back and what does he do - "Oh
sorry, I am engaged to the Ickmonster" YEAH RIGHT!  Icky did have her
moments...and when she died, I did believe that Drake's character loved
her...BUT I did NOT believe it during August 1991-September 1992. 
Marlena was his great love - the one he had the "bond" with - the one
that he mourned - the one that he took so long to get over.   And the
same with Marlena....Yes, she loved(s) Roman(Wayne) BUT - she fell in
love with the character(s) played by Drake and LOVED him even when she
thought that he might be Stefano.  None of this stuff was resolved.

This should have been done back in 1991 when Marlena returned or when
Wayne returned.  But - I'll take it now.  As many of the Jack lovers
know - you take your man any way you can get him.....


>*A disgruntled Razzleberry (who is not looking forward to this week)

A Banana who is looking forward to more Marlena fantasies but NOT SSH's
departure...
Organization: University of Louisville
Date: Friday, 22 Jan 1993 00:38:18 EST
From: Robert A. Metzger <RAMETZ01@ULKYVM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB: Jan 15th
 <C17Gzx.M8E@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>

In article <C17Gzx.M8E@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, jereese@silver.ucs.indiana.edu
(jean reese) says:
>
>What do you mean 'left out'? Do you mean we forgot to report it or that
>not everything worked out? We did report it, although I forgot in my
>regular update, I think Pat caught it and commented on it.
>
>Jean
>

Sorry about that.  I meant the comment made by CC after giving Ted his share of
Capwell Ent. that on Jan 15th. everything will work out.  I don't know if the
words are exactly as CC said them, but it was something to that effect. The
last show did not mention anything about this.  I think it was overlooked or
just left out.

I was not referring to the show's update for the 15th at all, I thought that
was a fantastic update.  Hope this makes better sense.        `


Robert A. Metzger                RAMETZ01 @ ULKYVM
University of Louisville
Programmer II, Information Systems

Profanity is the one language all programmers know best.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jql@synopsys.Synopsys.COM (Julie Lewis)
Subject: Re: AMC:  A&Dw/SOM:  NOLA
Organization: Synopsys Inc., Mountain View, CA 94043
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:50:46 GMT

In article <25JAN199320293740@xenon.arc.nasa.gov>, holst@xenon.arc.nasa.gov (Laura Holst) writes:
|> Ditto from last post :)
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> Barbara Rush leaves her role as NOLA January 28 in a
|> three-hankie final scene with TAD.  The actress will
|> continue to appear in flashbacks.

This is *such* a bummer!  I was waiting for Nola and Opal
to tangle with each other over who was Teads *real* mother!

Another golden opportunity missed by the writers!

-- 
Julie Lewis                                    jql@synopsys.com
"I won't stay where I'm not wanted!"  -- Dorian Lord
"Prepare to wander the Earth Dorian." --Asa Buchanon

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kvt@willow.mitre.org
Subject: DOOL:  Roman and Marlena's past
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:25:56 GMT

Can someone please post the date of Roman (Wayne)
and Marlena's wedding and/or the twin's birthday?
and how old was Carrie when the twins were born?

After today's episode (1/26) Carrie and Sammie
look to be about a year or two apart. But, I guess
that Carrie is supposed to be 19 and Sammie is supposed
to be 15, is this right?  Was Carrie 4 when the twins
were born?  Sorry, I didn't watch back then.

Kathy T.
From: alex@unx.sas.com (Alexandra Bost)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: Crimes Against Women and Children
Date: 25 Jan 1993 09:41:39 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

robin@ntmtv.UUCP (Robin Coutellier) writes:

>        - Fondled
>        - Followed
>        - Made the target audience of a male exposing himself and/or
>          masterbating
>        - Watched while in a state of undress
>        - Raped
>        - Beaten or killed

>Which of you women has never had anything like this happen to her?

Jeez, Robin.  You have quite a point.  I have had at least four things 
on that list happen to me...and I certainly thought I was in a minority
(until I started watching "Oprah"!)

Seriously, this is DEPRESSING...


Alex
--
Alexandra Bost                |      _   _    ___  _ _
UNIX System Administrator     |     / \ | |  | _ |\ | /
SAS Institute,    Cary NC     |    / ^ \| |_ | _|  > <
E-mail:  alex@unx.sas.com     |    |_|_||___||___|/_|_\
From: johnson@emx.cc.utexas.edu (Karen Johnson Morgan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Spolier/Comments
Date: 21 Jan 1993 09:35:35 -0600
Organization: U. Texas Center for Space Research
NNTP-Posting-Host: emx.cc.utexas.edu

In article <01GTP7H4DB8Y000EH3@JAGUAR.UOFS.EDU> TIGRETTP1@JAGUAR.UOFS.EDU ("Pam Tigrett, Campus Ministries") writes:
>
>-- Dixie shows Nola a picture of Jr. and Nola realizes the truth,

This doesn't make any sense at all.  Why would a picture of Jr. give
her any clues?  He's not even related to Tad!

Karen

-- 
        karen@louise.ae.utexas.edu   -or-   johnson@emx.utexas.edu
From: greenlaw@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Leila Thomas)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: SB:  Would like recommendations for new soap
Date: 27 Jan 93 11:55:27 GMT
Reply-To: greenlaw@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Leila Thomas)
Distribution: na
Organization: David Taylor Research Center, Annapolis, MD

I would like a synopsis of soaps (less than one page) of why I should
watch a certain soap.  If possible I would like to watch one that is
a little different from ordinary soaps.  Since SB has gone off the air,
I have tuned in once to each of the following Y&R, B&B and GH.  I have
been watching Guiding Light a couple of times a week, but so far none
has really peeked my interest and I didn't realize that I would miss
my soap so much.

Leila



*******************************************************************
"Beauty and the Beast, well thought of by people who think." ---
Roy Dotrice
********************************************************************
From: patricia@pete.uucp (Patricia Peterson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Erica
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 93 11:11:52 -0800
Reply-To: patricia%pete%nicmad%astroatc.uucp@spool.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: My system in Madison WI

In <93021.132418JSNYDER@auvm.american.edu> Joni Snyder <JSNYDER@auvm.american.edu> writes:
>In article <MfLelb_00Uh7A1cXRF@andrew.cmu.edu>, Jennifer Allyson Turner
><jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu> says:
>>
>>>My daughter noticed today that when Erica was going back to bed
>>>she had shoes on.  I was not watching the screen so I said "they
>>>must be bedroom slippers"  To which my daughter said, "No, they
>>>are shoes, high heels.  I reversed the tape and sure enough Erica
>>>had on a pair of 2-3 inch heels.  How many of you keep a pair of
>>>heels by your bed when your in the hospital?
>>>
>>>
>What ever happened to Erica's broken leg?  Could it be better this
>soon?  If it were OK would you be able to wear 3" heels?

>I don't think so.  My son broke his arm this fall and was in a cast for
>8 weeks. The arm was sensitive for about 2 more weeks after the cast
>came off.


Yes, but remember Pine Valley is hooked up to ST:TNG's transporter.
So, maybe they also have one of those do-hickey's that Dr. Crusher
uses to fuse broken bones in an instant.  

	INSTA-MEND  brought to you by the makers of PVGD.
		
		Yes folks, with one touch of this state of the
		art instrument, you too can mend broken bones and
		ligaments in the blink of an eye.
		Avoid messy casting material, and chicken skin
		from having your cast on to long.  
		INSTA-MEND is the product you've been waiting for
		for years.
		Send $5,000 to Insta-Mend, P.O.Box 2001, SpaceStation
		9.  No C.O.D.'s accepted.  Void where prohibit by
		law.


Patricia

-- 
Patricia Peterson   (608)273-4573
Inet: patricia%pete%nicmad%astroatc.uucp@spool.cs.wisc.edu
From: snodgras@lclark.edu (Bil Snodgrass)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: Y&rDR
Date: 26 Jan 93 16:30:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: lclark.1993Jan26.163058.21938
Distribution: usa
Organization: Lewis & Clark College, Portland OR

In article <C1GwK1.39L@hpuerca.atl.hp.com> mhr@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Mike Reaser) writes:
>In <1k2qg7INNdg8@cuda.add.itg.ti.com> lydia@tarsal.dsg.ti.com (lydia middendorf ) writes:
>

>>		   Victoria.....Ictoria   (paroxide poisioning or what?)
>>		   Victor.......Ictor     (the hypocrit)
>           
>>		   Cricket......The bug   (one of these days we won't be
                                           able to muffle out the sound
                                           caused by the wind blowing
     			                   between her ears!)
>>		   Nikki........Iicky     (Nikki has not life)
>              Nookie?
>
>>		   Jill.........?         ( the brains on the show!!)
>>		   Ashley.......?         (daddy's little girl, substitutes
                                            boyfriends for daddy)

>      




>>		   Neil.........?         (cardboard man!)
>>		   Dru..........?         (please grow up to be like Jill!)
>>		   Tracy........?         (the queen of confusiong)



>>		   Paul.........?         (peroxide poisoing!)

>>		   Lauren.......slut?     (get better tast in men!)
                                          (I perfer to call her STUD!)

Bil Snodgrass III

>
>--
>=======================================================================
> Mike Reaser, Hewlett-Packard N. Amer. Response Center - Atlanta
> Internet:  mhr@hpuerca.atl.hp.com
> NBCS: B5 f t w g+ k s              I barely speak for myself, so
> #include <standard.disclaimer>       don't make me speak for HP
>=======================================================================
From: daveo@hpcvra.cv.hp.com (Dave Ochs)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 23:54:14 GMT
Subject: Re: AMC: Idiotic Plot Twists
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, OR, USA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps

>/ hpcvra:rec.arts.tv.soaps / IRPROB@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu /  9:08 pm  Jan 21, 1993 /
>I guess I'm going to buck the trend here, but the only thing to me more
>idiotic than Tad's amnesia and near-misses with his loved ones is the
>"story" (using the term loosely) of Jack and his mystery woman.  If there

You are certainly NOT bucking a trend there...

>could *possibly* be *anything* more ludicrous than Jack and his mystery
>woman, it would have to be Erica *pretending* to have amnesia and not only
>fooling Dimwit and Mona, but the doctors!  And if it's that easy for Erica

Now wait a minute!  :-) :-) I am loving this story, not 'cause it's
realistic, but because it's so ... "Erica."  It's just funny, but I think
she will blow it if she keeps coming up with stuff like the "I feel like
drinking some wine" comment when meeting Edmund ... I mean, even people in
Pine Valley catch on eventually [Trevor excluded].

>slow - even Hellga outran them!  Erica thinking she might know Dimitri from
>a marching band?  This is their idea of comedy?!  (She should have said he

Well *I* thought it was funny ... (note sig) ...

>On the plus side, I thought the scenes with Adam and Hayley were *great*!
>She really told him how she felt, and I think Adam finally got a clue as to
>what he had done to her in the past.  Unfortunately, as usual, Pops will
>return to his old ways.

I feel *really* bad I missed this ... didn't change my VCR setting and 
got the inauguration instead.

>Rob. Taylor

Dave Ochs            "I just had this image of you ... you were wearing a
daveo@cv.hp.com       sash and shiny gold buttons ... were you ever in a 
Corvallis, OR         marching band?"          "Amnesia" Erica to Dimitri
Organization: Junior, English, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 16:32:12 -0500 
From: Dawn Marie Neuhart <dn1g+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: SB: more memories con't
	<1jrv29INNh8u@coral.bucknell.edu>

I definatly remember the female cop putting on the wig and trying to be
kelly.  It worked too, Peter was falling for it, but then she couldn't
shoot and he noticed something different about her, so he went to shoot
her and then the other cops put a few rounds of bullets into him.


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps