From: casper@vxcrna.cern.ch (CASPER,DAVI./PPE)
Subject: Re: Mr Cern
Summary: 10 things you need to know.....
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 11:18:00 GMT

In article <Bv9G60.5E0@exnet.co.uk>, s0xjg@exnet.co.uk (Xavier Gallagher) writes...


Hmm, finally a chart interpretation I can sink my teeth into.

It is odd that this is so negative, I have heard from others here that I "have
a very nice chart".   But oh well.

Well, I too am sticking my neck out by revealing personal information in a
largely hostile forum.  No doubt I will live to regret it.

>I have been looking at his birthchart.  Assuming it is right and that
>I have some skill in this area and that astrology works I have come to
>some conclusions.  These are not psychological observations as pycho
>astrology cannot be proved right or wrong.  Hopefully these are testable.
>Actually I tell a lie, 1 psycho astrology observation sneaked in.

>1. His father is either physicaly injured (damaged) or in a bad material
>   situation. He returns often. 

Can't answer the first two because the third is about as wrong as it could
be.  My parents were divorced before I was born and I have never met my
father.

>2. He (Dave) has no sense of restriction or responsibility.

Hmm. Tough for me to answer this one.  I will not claim to be the most
responsible person in the world.  On the other hand I have not done so badly
for myself.

>3. Daves' Mother is/was held in high esteem,especialy by the native.  
>   However she is probably dead or seldom seen.

Mom's an evangelist, and we haven't gotten along terribly well at all since
she got religion.  While she is my mother, I cannot say I hold her in unusually
high esteem, since I believe she has basically become brainwashed.  She works
in the Phillipines, so the second part is correct (congratulations).

>4. Dave has no children and never will have.

No children at present.  We'll have to wait on the latter.

>5. Daves' body is physicaly damaged.  I be tempted to say he is in a wheel
>   chair but Venus is in its' own face.  As it is I can only say he is
>   physically very weak.

Nah, while I wouldn't say I have an athletic physique, I am physically quite
active and generally very healthy.  I have a large build and cannot be
considered physically weak.

>6. Scar on his face,(a burn or red mark) halfway down his face. Possibly
>   there is a scare on his hips.

Nope.

>7. As a child spent lots of time in an institution, probably a hospital
>   but considering the positions of the moon and saturn it could be an
>   orphanage.

Nope.  Hospitalized three times (for about 1 week each)...once for tonsils,
once for pneumonia, and once for appendectomy.  Never seen an orphanage.

>8. Heck! just not a healthy person.

I think you're basically incorrect about this.

>9. One brother and two sisters.  Failing this at least more sisters than
>   brothers.  Not an only child.

Bzzzt.  Only child.

>10.Many enemies both open and secret brought about through having a big
>   mouth and rapier pen. Constantly surrounded by strife.  Many are women
>   and many are figures of authority, many he considers to be his freinds.

Well, obviously I wouldn't know about secret enemies.  I tend to be quite
frank about my opinions (you'd have never guessed, would you?) which puts some
people off, but I cannot say I have any "open enemies" (outside alt.astrology,
I suppose).  And unfortunately, one doesn't meet many women authority figures
in my line of work.

>   Dave will marry once or not at all. Venus is crap,moon in the 8th but
>   Jupe in the 7th. This relationship has many ups and downs with the
>   partner leaving and coming back much like a boomerang.  If Dave is as
>   damaged as his Venus indicates this partner might not be a marriage
>   partner but maybe a carer of some sort. Perhaps a nurse or a doctor.

Not married yet.  The future is unwritten...

>Hope these are right.  My astrological head is on the block here.

Gee I hope you were really giving what you knew to be diametrically opposite to
the correct interpretation in the hopes I'd contradict you.  Otherwise you'd
better go back to the drawing board.

Thanks for trying though.  Now using what I've revealed here, everyone else can
go back and say "oh yeah, that makes sense, look at this aspect here..."


Dave