From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: Chaney's problems - call for discussion (was: Re: Garvin gets 
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 07:37:37 GMT
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Summary: And Chaney's got big problems.

<1992Aug31.231943.621@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) :
><adams.714668119@spssig> adams@spss.com (Steve Adams) writes:
>>franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin) writes:
>>>In <st_nv5=.gordons@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
[High level signature "debate" deleted]

>And Steve Franklin nails Gordon Storga! 

Really?  In what way?  You surely don't mean his childish attempt at
signiture assault.  You couldn't be that naive...  could you?

...
>>
>>You've devolved to attacking his sig...does that mean you've conceded the
>>debate?
>
>If that means Steve Franklin's conceded the debate, it means that all
>those who ignore my unavoidable points and merely attack MY .sig,
                     ^^^^^^^^^^^
If they were unavoidable we would have seen them.  Perhaps you can repost
any points you believe you've made.

>concede several DOZEN debates I've challenged them to. 

Challenge?  I admit to not reading every post in this group.  There are
far too many to read, for those of us who actually have a job that is.
But if you've posted any argument remotely considered to be a *challenge*
I'd like to see it.

>Your side has a LOT more to lose on that standard than our side does,
>Adams. 

There's a standard for signiture assault??

>>BTW, Gordon's demonstrated a lot more intelligence and reasonableness than
>>you have.  He's demonstrated the ability to carry on rational discussions.
>
>With whom? His houseplants? 

They make better points than you've made in this group.

>                            Certainly no one around here, at least not
>much. 

Well, of course no one around you.  No one intelligent would hang around
you so there wouldn't be much point in talking to them.

>      Let's not forget that funny part where Gordon Storgidius jumped
>in to help Dan King get his foot out of his mouth over that $100
>challenge he can't afford to pay up for, and I and Kevin Welch both
>stomped on him like a roach on the sidewalk. 

A) You reneged on that bet that you lost fair and square.
B) I think you'd better have another talk with Kevin Welch when he gets
   back this semester.  It would shock many people to find out that he and
   I are old friends.
C) Your prediliction for violence is showing.

>If Steve Franklin had been there, Gordon would have found himself a
>shell and promptly crawled into it, 

Why?  Is Franklin that ugly?

>                                    while Dan Astro Boy King would
>have quickly found a rocket and flown it to Mars. 

Uh, Steve, Dan King can't fly to Mars.  Unless you know something the rest
of the world doesn't, *no one* has ever flown to Mars.  If you were just
speaking in metaphor, it was lost completely.

I didn't think I'd see much funnier than Franklin's "attack" on my sig,
until your defense of Franklin.  You boys run along home now, y'hear.


Gordon
Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel, 
Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), and Diana (Sorceress),
and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it.
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion