HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 08:30:50 CST
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
From:         Adam Floro <CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU>
Subject:      Moving List Archive Files

From:  Adam Floro

Our LISTSERV has several list archive files on its A-disk that we would
like moved to another LISTSERV minidisk.  We created a 200 disk as
suggested in Ben Chi's FSV GUIDE, but we are unsure how to proceed.
Can we just move the files over?  Do we need to modify/create any
other files when making the move?  Any help is greatly appreciated.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adam Floro                                Bitnet:  CA1225@SIUCVMB
Systems Programmer                      Internet:  CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU
Southern Illinois University                  IP:  CA1225@131.230.1.2
Carbondale, IL 62901                       Voice:  (618) 453-6238
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: State University of New York at Buffalo
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 21 Aug 1992 15:41:26 EDT
From:         Jim Gerland - Network User Support <GERLAND@UBVM.BITNET>
Subject:      SHOW NODE /:tag enhancement request

I would like to see if there is any interest in asking Eric to enhance
the SHOW NODE /:tag command so that when it finds a :P_xxxxxx tag, it
searches for and returns the real value of that tag.

This would be useful since now if people want to find out who the
:userinfo person is for one of my sites, they have to issue 2 commands:

show node /:userinfo
and
show node /:p_haxlerod


Thanks.


Jim Gerland  - Consultant, Network User Support           University at Buffalo
Academic Services, Computing & Information Technology     Buffalo, NY 14260
716.645.3557 Work                                         716.645.3734 FAX
gerland@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu                              gerland@ubvms.bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 10:56:40 CST
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
From:         Adam Floro <CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU>
Subject:      Archiving

From:  Adam Floro

Can someone point me to a document that explains in detail all necessary
procedures for archiving a list?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adam Floro                                Bitnet:  CA1225@SIUCVMB
Systems Programmer                      Internet:  CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU
Southern Illinois University                  IP:  CA1225@131.230.1.2
Carbondale, IL 62901                       Voice:  (618) 453-6238
From: SYSSHASH@UKCC.UKY.EDU (Sathaye, Shashi)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Subject: Re: Archiving
Date: 14 Aug 92 18:27:18 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

On Fri, 14 Aug 1992 12:41:37 EDT Duane D. Weaver said:
>This really documented as such.
>
>The listserv postmaster must define another minidisk for Listserv's
>use.  Next, it is a good idea to add a MDISK.cuu statement to LOCAL SYSVARS,
>to have Listserv watch the space usage.
>
>When that is done, archiving for a particular list is started by
>setting the list keyword NOTEBOOK= Yes,fm,type,access
>
>where fm is the filemode of the log disk
>      type of archive, most commonly Monthly
>      access   who can request the log, usually Public
>
>The Notebook keyword is documented in the file LISTKEYW MEMO, while
>the MDISK.cuu statement for LOCAL SYSVARS is documented within LOCAL SYSVARS.
This all works. But here is a problem I like to see addressed:
1. If I do not want 'indefinite' archiving, and I find myself either
deleting files from this disk or expanding it every two months or so,
wouldn't it be nice to
a. have a command that 'compresses' these notebooks. Sends them in compressed
form to the subscribers.
b. let listserv access the 'owner's' disk whenever a notebook needs to be
updates, accessed - and the owner takes responsibility of keeping track of
disk space..
I am shoulder deep into Unix stuff these days - though I am kind of a short
person - so please don't make me write any CMS stuff..
Shashi.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Wed, 19 Aug 1992 09:36:32 CST
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
From:         Adam Floro <CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU>
Subject:      LISTSERV Documentation

From:  Adam Floro

Where can I find documentation on maintaining LISTSERV?  Presently, we are
having difficulty setting up the LISTSERV FILELIST, setting up archival
of lists, and setting up the FILELIST files for those archives.  Can
someone PLEASE direct me to a location where I can retrieve documentation
related to LISTSERV?  Thanks.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adam Floro                                Bitnet:  CA1225@SIUCVMB
Systems Programmer                      Internet:  CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU
Southern Illinois University                  IP:  CA1225@131.230.1.2
Carbondale, IL 62901                       Voice:  (618) 453-6238
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 21:07:09 EST
From:         Jim Jones <JIMJ@JHUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: %% Undelivered Mail %%
              14 Aug 1992 16:24:06 EDT from <SK@CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU>

On Fri, 14 Aug 1992 16:24:06 EDT Sanjay Kapur said:
>Another sample of mail that almost got sent to the list

 Just by coincedence, I've received several mail bounces from a site in
 the UK with very similar mail headers.  Since JHUVM's LISTSERV recognized
 the ones I got as mail delivery errors, I thought it might be useful to
 point out the differences.  In both cases, the Subject: lines have a
 lovely "%%" prepended to the useful information, which while *most*
 aesthetically pleasing, isn't trapped by LISTSERV.  Also, we both have
 From: lines with "Mail_System" instead of "postmaster" or one of the
 other recognized userids.  The difference is, luckily in my case, the
 encapsulated mail that was being returned, didn't have the addresses
 flipped ass-backwards in JANET order.  So, my LISTSERV saw the mailing
 list address in the body of the mail message.  In your case, your
 LISTSERV saw, Sender: ORACLE-L@edu.sunysb.CCVM, which is total crap as
 far as everyone but JANET is concerned.  Why were the mail headers in
 your rejections left in JANET order, while mine were in Internet order?
 I have no idea, and I'd suggest sending a note to the postmaster of the
 system that rejected the mail and the postmaster of the JANET mail
 gateway system.  I've had good luck in getting help from the folks at
 the Bitnet/JANET gateway in the past, even when in a few cases, it
 proved rather difficult to isolate/resolve the problems.  I personally
 don't think mail should be allowed back into Bitnet/Internet with unusable
 headers.  And if some sites are going to make cute headers with "%%" gizmos
 to 'highlight' Subject: text and use unusual From: address in mail rejection
 notices, the text of the returned mail becomes a rather important piece of
 information.  I'd argue that having the mail addresses in the encapsulated
 message in the proper order for the receiving network becomes necessary.
 And as I said, at least some JANET sites are formatting such headers in
 Internet order.  My question to the postmaster(s) would be why don't they
 all work properly?

>
>  Sanjay Kapur                        |Internet:    Sanjay.Kapur@sunysb.edu
>  Systems Staff, Computing Services,  |Bitnet:      SKAPUR@USB
>  State University of New York,       |SPAN/HEPnet: 44132::SKAPUR
>  Stony Brook, NY 11794-2400          |Phone:(516)632-8029, FAX:(516)632-8046

 -jj
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via: uk.ac.southampton-institute; Fri, 14 Aug 1992 19:39:13 +0100
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 16:24:06 EDT
Comments:     Resent-From: Sanjay Kapur <SK@ccvm.sunysb.edu>
Comments:     Originally-From: Mail_System@SOUTHAMPTON-INSTITUTE.AC.UK
From:         Sanjay Kapur <SK@CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU>
Subject:      %% Undelivered Mail %%

Another sample of mail that almost got sent to the list


  Sanjay Kapur                        |Internet:    Sanjay.Kapur@sunysb.edu
  Systems Staff, Computing Services,  |Bitnet:      SKAPUR@USB
  State University of New York,       |SPAN/HEPnet: 44132::SKAPUR
  Stony Brook, NY 11794-2400          |Phone:(516)632-8029, FAX:(516)632-8046



----------------------------Original message----------------------------
This message was originally submitted by Mail_System@SOUTHAMPTON-INSTITUTE.AC.U
K to the ORACLE-L list at SBCCVM. If you simply forward it back to the list, it
will be distributed with the paragraph  you are now reading being automatically
removed. If you edit the contributions you receive into a digest, you will need
to remove this paragraph before mailing the result to the list. Finally, if you
need more information from the author of this message, you should be able to do
so by simply replying to this note.

----------------- Message requiring your approval (46 lines) ------------------
Your mail was not delivered as follows:
%MAIL-E-SENDERR, error sending to user Z_STAFF_CL
-MAIL-E-OPENOUT, error opening $2$DIA4:[Z.STAFF.CL]MAIL.MAI; as output
-SYSTEM-F-IVDEVNAM, invalid device name
%MAIL-E-SENDERR, error sending to user Z_STAFF_CL
-MAIL-E-OPENOUT, error opening $2$DIA4:[Z.STAFF.CL]MAIL.MAI; as output
-SYSTEM-F-IVDEVNAM, invalid device name

Your original mail header and message follow.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Fri, 14 Aug 92  19:38 GMT
Received: from ccvm.sunysb.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
          id <sg.03158-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>;
          Fri, 14 Aug 1992 19:37:19 +0100
Received: from ccvm.sunysb.edu by CCVM.sunysb.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
          id 2490; Fri, 14 Aug 92 13:55:33 EDT
Received: from SBCCVM.BITNET by ccvm.sunysb.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208004)
          with BSMTP id 0601; Fri, 14 Aug 92 13:55:29 EDT
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 13:53:08 EDT
Reply-To: "ORACLE database mailing list." <ORACLE-L@edu.sunysb.CCVM>
Original-Sender: "ORACLE database mailing list." <ORACLE-L@edu.sunysb.CCVM>
From: Tim London <tim@uk.co.british-telecom.kbss>
Subject: Re: Primary keys and foreign keys, what's the real scoop?
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <ORACLE-L@edu.sunysb.CCVM>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Sat, 22 Aug 1992 00:15:21 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: SHOW NODE /:tag enhancement request
              21 Aug 1992 15:41:26 EDT from "Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7"
              <LSTSRV-L@SEARN>

On Fri, 21 Aug 1992 15:41:26 EDT Jim Gerland - Network User Support
<GERLAND@UBVM> said:

>I would like to see if there is any interest in asking Eric to enhance
>the SHOW NODE /:tag command so that when it finds a :P_xxxxxx tag, it
>searches for and returns the real value of that tag.
>
>This would be useful since now if people want to find out who the
>:userinfo person is for one of my sites, they have to issue 2 commands:
>
>show node /:userinfo
>and
>show node /:p_haxlerod

You are lucky if  you only have to issue 2  commands: this information is
usually in  the member  entry for  BITNET nodes. The  best way  to locate
contacts is to use the database system and use the PRINT CONTACT command.

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: University at Albany Computing Services
X-Acknowledge-To: <BEC@ALBANY>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 14:24:58 EDT
From:         Ben Chi <BEC@ALBANY.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Moving List Archive Files
              17 Aug 1992 08:30:50 CST from <CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU>

On Mon, 17 Aug 1992 08:30:50 CST Adam Floro said:
>Our LISTSERV has several list archive files on its A-disk that we would
>like moved to another LISTSERV minidisk.  We created a 200 disk as
>suggested in Ben Chi's FSV GUIDE, but we are unsure how to proceed.
>Can we just move the files over?  Do we need to modify/create any
>other files when making the move?

As I recall, all you have to do is to modify the NOTEBOOK keyword in
each of the list headers to read something like

*  Notebook=Yes,X1/200,Monthly,Private
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Aerospace Eng., Technion, Haifa, Israel
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Wed, 19 Aug 1992 16:58:12 IST
Comments:     Domain address: <AER7101@TECHNION.TECHNION.AC.IL>
Comments:     Fax: +972 4 231848       Phone: +972 4 292706
From:         Zvika Bar-Deroma <AER7101@TECHNION.BITNET>
Subject:      CLJI (?) question

I  need to  issue  a "query  *  (netwide" (I  know,  there's no  netwide
option), so I thought of sending a small CLJI job, but the problem is, I
don't know the syntax I need. More  specifically - how do I code to have
the job propagated  to all servers (or should I  blush 'cause that's the
default behaviour ?) ?

Thanks for any input on the matter,

/Zvika
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Sat, 15 Aug 1992 01:52:47 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Archiving
              14 Aug 1992 14:27:18 EDT from "Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7"
              <LSTSRV-L@SEARN>

On Fri, 14 Aug 1992 14:27:18 EDT "Sathaye, Shashi" SYSSHASH@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
<said:

>This all works. But here is a problem I like to see addressed:
>
>1. If  I do not  want 'indefinite' archiving,  and I find  myself either
>deleting files  from this disk or  expanding it every two  months or so,
>wouldn't it be nice to
>
>a.  have a  command that  'compresses'  these notebooks.  Sends them  in
>compressed form to the subscribers.

As long  as you (1) answer  the questions from subscribers  who need help
decompressing them and (2) write a program that can not only compress the
notebooks when the disk is almost  full, but also compress the compressed
notebooks again  when the disk  is again almost  full 3 months  after the
first compression  and save  another 3  months of disk  space, I  have no
objection.

>b. let listserv  access the 'owner's' disk whenever a  notebook needs to
>be updates,  accessed -  and the owner  takes responsibility  of keeping
>track of disk space..

If you  are talking about minidisks,  you have indeed been  too deep into
unix stuff for  too long. If you  are talking about SFS,  this is already
available, just  grant the owner  R/W access  to the directory  where the
archives are stored.

>I am shoulder  deep into Unix stuff these  days - though I am  kind of a
>short person - so please don't make me write any CMS stuff..

In case that was supposed to convince me to write your CMS stuff for you,
I'm afraid you will need much better arguments.

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Academic User Services, The University of Akron
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 21 Aug 1992 10:33:08 EDT
From:         Gary Sponseller <SPONSELL@AKRONVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Message

On Thu, 20 Aug 1992 16:35:32 CST Brent Stilley said:
>Is it possible for me to increase the number associated with this msg out
>of Listserv?  Or is the FREE command my only circumvention?

Add Daily-Threshold= 100 to your list keywords section.

>Brent

Gary
>----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>
>Daily mailing threshold (50) exceeded for list AWARDS-B. Mailing operations
>are being discontinued until a "FREE AWARDS-B" command is received.
From: BITMAN@DOEVM.BITNET (Bitnet Mgr. at Dept. of Energy Hqs.)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Subject: (no subject given)
Date: 19 Aug 92 18:52:55 GMT
Organization: U.S. Dept. of Energy
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

On Tue, 18 Aug 1992 09:57:51 EST Ken said:
>I am in the process of setting up a new list (my first).  I have got
>the list up and running in test mode but have run into a slight problem.
>We are running OfficeVision with PUMP at two locations in our network.
>If anyone from either location uses OV to subscribe to the list it
>appears as if the Mailbox manager is subscribing and not the user.  The
>user isn't recognized and isn't subscribed to the list.  If the user
>subscribes using Mailer or IBM NOTE then everything works ok.
>
Your users aren't activating PUMP in order to convert the OV-format note
into RFC822 format mail.  Make a CMS NAMES nickname entry for the Listserv,
and send the subscription note to CMSNAMES(Listserv-nickname).

It might be easier in the long run, though, to teach them to use Ricemail.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 10:49:29 CST
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
From:         Adam Floro <CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU>
Subject:      MAXGETK

From:  Adam Floro

Does anyone know the procedure for increasing the MAXGETK default
above 256K?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adam Floro                                Bitnet:  CA1225@SIUCVMB
Systems Programmer                      Internet:  CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU
Southern Illinois University                  IP:  CA1225@131.230.1.2
Carbondale, IL 62901                       Voice:  (618) 453-6238
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 12:41:37 EDT
From:         "Duane D. Weaver" <WEAVER@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Archiving
              14 Aug 1992 10:56:40 CST from <CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU>

This really documented as such.

The listserv postmaster must define another minidisk for Listserv's
use.  Next, it is a good idea to add a MDISK.cuu statement to LOCAL SYSVARS,
to have Listserv watch the space usage.

When that is done, archiving for a particular list is started by
setting the list keyword NOTEBOOK= Yes,fm,type,access

where fm is the filemode of the log disk
      type of archive, most commonly Monthly
      access   who can request the log, usually Public

The Notebook keyword is documented in the file LISTKEYW MEMO, while
the MDISK.cuu statement for LOCAL SYSVARS is documented within LOCAL SYSVARS.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Sat, 22 Aug 1992 03:21:11 +0200
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Changes to SIGNUP and PWLIST FILE for 1.7d

The next release (1.7d) will no longer have a SIGNUP FILE or PWLIST FILE.
The data will be stored in a new file called SIGNUP2 FILE. Local programs
which read the old files directly will just get a "file not found" error,
and programs which update PWLIST FILE  will not have the expected results
(there will be a new call to add/replace passwords). Updating SIGNUP FILE
directly has  always had unpredictable  side effects,  so this is  not an
issue.  I would  like to  remind you  that  I did  not write  and do  not
maintain /WHOIS, /WHERE et  al and I have no idea how  much time it would
take to change them. All I can say is that it should be possible, in fact
I bet  someone will do it  in "only 5 minutes,  it was no big  deal after
all" and end up showing passwords to anyone sending a query :-)

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Resent-Organization: Oklahoma State University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Thu, 20 Aug 1992 16:35:32 CST
Comments:     Resent-From: Brent Stilley <UCCXBRS@OSUVM1.BITNET>
Comments:     Originally-From: Revised List Processor (1.7c)
              <LISTSERV@OSUVM1.BITNET>
From:         Brent Stilley <UCCXBRS@OSUVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Message

Is it possible for me to increase the number associated with this msg out
of Listserv?  Or is the FREE command my only circumvention?

Brent Stilley,  Oklahoma State University, 113 Math Sciences, Stillwater, 74078

----------------------------Original message----------------------------

Daily mailing threshold (50) exceeded for list AWARDS-B. Mailing operations
are being discontinued until a "FREE AWARDS-B" command is received.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Instituto Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Queretaro
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 17 Aug 1992 12:34:06 CST
From:         "Juan M. Courcoul" <COURCOUL@VMTECQRO.QRO.ITESM.MX>
Subject:      Re: Moving List Archive Files
Comments: To: Adam Floro <CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU>,
              "Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7" <LSTSRV-L@UGA.BITNET>
              17 Aug 1992 08:30:50 CST from <CA1225@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU>

On Mon, 17 Aug 1992 08:30:50 CST you said:
>
>Our LISTSERV has several list archive files on its A-disk that we would
>like moved to another LISTSERV minidisk.  We created a 200 disk as
>suggested in Ben Chi's FSV GUIDE, but we are unsure how to proceed.

For starters, I suggest keeping things simple and accessing the 200
disk statically, by adding the ACCESS command to the PROFILE EXEC, say
ACCESS 200 G.

Then, you can copy all the log files over to that disk, change the list
header (in the XXX LIST file) to point to the other disk, as in:

*  Notebook= Yes,G,Monthly,Public

The DBINDEX and DBNAMES files you can erase, and have the server regen
them on the new disk.

After you restart the server, I suggest you execute the following two
commands either on the console or via TELLs from the postmaster account:

REFRESH  listname
DB REFRESH listname

One last thing before I go: be sure to add the new disk to the MDISK and
CHECKMDISK variables in the LOCAL SYSVARS file, so the server issues a
timely warning if the disk fills up, instead of failing unexpectedly.

Hope this helps.

JMC
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 10:33:03 CST
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
From:         Stace Cameron <GH0234%SPRINGB.bitnet@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU>
Subject:      SET NOMAIL (GLOBAL ?

*** Resending note of 08/14/92 10:31
To: LSTSRV-L--UGA

From: Stace Cameron

I have searched through the archives without success, is there a (GLOBAL
feature for SET NOMAIL? The SIGNOFF (GLOBAL command forwards the request
to peers if the user is not subscribed, is there an equivalent for setting
subscription options?

Stace Cameron, Data Processing Analyst
Computing Services, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
PO Box 19230, Springfield IL 62794-9230
GH0234@SPRINGB   217-782-4410   FAX: 217-785-5561
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 14 Aug 1992 15:50:27 EDT
From:         "Duane D. Weaver" <WEAVER@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Archiving
              14 Aug 1992 14:27:18 EDT from <SYSSHASH@UKCC.UKY.EDU>

The archive disk for LISTSERV@OHSTVMA is big enough to hold
almost 16 months worth of logs.   About twice a year, Listserv notifies me
that the disk is almost full.    I usually dump about 4-6 months worth of
logs (not that I have to) to tape, erase the logs from the disk and
forget about it.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%"EDI-L@UCCVMA.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Date:         Wed, 12 Aug 1992 09:07:00 MDT
From:         Lloyd Brodsky 303-628-1265 <LBRODSKY@CUDENVER.BITNET>
Subject:      RE: RFD: comp.infosystems.edi

I vote yes

Lloyd Brodsky
Univ of Colorado at Denver
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: EDI-L@UCCVMA.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"EDI-L@UCCVMA.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Date:         Sun, 16 Aug 1992 16:44:00 MST
From:         CITRJG@ARIZVMS.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Application programming interfaces

The DIGITAL translator DEC/EDI has EDI subroutines you can embed in your
application program.  As to the API or GUI as we call them around here, I
don't know yet if the DEC/EDI package goes all the way to DEC/windows.

Anybody out there using DEC/EDI ?  I have a question about X12-110 release
levels ...
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU