From: sergei@upenn5.hep.upenn.edu (Sergei Borodin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.soviet
Subject: Re: Sexual confession (following Dm. L.)
Date: 15 Oct 92 22:44:01 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


 
 
verbit@brauer.harvard.edu (Mikhail S. Verbitsky) pisses me off:

>The correspondents of this board  (sergei@upenn5.hep.upenn.edu (Sergei Borodin) 
>and vadim@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu) expressed recently the anxiousness to
>learn my sexual preferences. 

 You're flattering yourself, dear. Nobody wanted to *learn*, although some 
 willingness to *teach* might have been seen.
 
  In the response to  vadim@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu 
 (article <14211.2adaa561@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>) :
  
##  "And the same about men, who would like her wifes to look after home
##   and children instead of pursuing career. "  
   
   M. Verbitsky wrote: 
   
#   "And lick their genitalia. There are always people who want
#   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#   to oppress somebody's will and deprave others
#   of self-respect. "
 
 The undelined text above, in fact, provoked me to make some suggestions, 
 which M. Verbitsky found to be interesting:
 
>Sergay Borodin make interesting speculations
>on the topic of my relationship with my wife:

>>  Nu i mudak ty, Misha! Prosti za grubost'.
>>  Sounds like you understand sex as a mean to make a baby. Well, 
>>  *the* mean. So, (can I ask a private question?) once a week
>>  you are climbing on your wife and ... 2 minutes later go
>>  asleep? BTW, try to lick her 'genitalia' she (might be you too)
>>  might enjoy it.  
>>  Well, I guess so intelligent person can't opress a woman in
>>  such a shame way.

 Although I understand that some sentences might be seen as an explicit 
 interest to M.Verbitsky's sexual prefernces,  the whole reply was intended
 to be a suggestion on the topic proposed by this honorable sexologist (see
 underlined text above) e.g. how to make the process of licking man's genitalia
 to be inoffensive to a woman performing the action, but rather enjoyable. 
 I'm suprized that such a smart man as M. Verbitsky could have understood it 
 in a different way.
 
>Following the bright example of Dmitry Leshchiner,
>I feel obliged to make a sexual confession.

 No, don't feel obligated. I would be better off teaching us to be not
 oppressive to women.

>First of all, when I have sex with women I do it strictly in
>missionary position. I feel that any other use of women is morally
>sick and deprives a woman of her inborn rights. 

  "Any other use of women"? I wonder how such a feministically oriented 
 person could even put these words together : "use of women". Like they
 would have been stupid widgets.
 It's inconsistent with what you said in your other postings.

>I don't have a sex
>with women often, though, since I am strictly gay. 

 If you do have sex with women, although not often, you are not strictly a gay.

>No, dear Sergey Borodin,
>I will not be your boyfriend. Univ. of Penn. is too far away,

 That is correct. Moreover, my sexual orientation does not allow me to 
 see a boyfriend in a man. But if you use the name Misha Verbitsky to 
 hide your gender, we could discuss the possibility of being my girlfriend.
 (color photo required)

>and besides I don't want to have sex with china pig.

  As you wish, but if you would happen to be a girl you could have 
  sex with me (the distance from Upenn beyond the point).

> My sexual
>preference is B&D sex with male gebrils.

 I knew that, somehow it could be felt in your postings.  Let me ask the net:
 did any body feel the same?

> Anyway, I have a little
>fixation on velvet-clad 4 years old female prostitutes.

 Again, you're flattering yourself. There will be no Nabokov who would 
 take you as a prototype.

>If you have a friend or acquaintance who knows one,
>please tell me, or, better, post it on this board.

 Out of my interests. I prefer married women. It's safer. 

>Misha.

 Sergei Borodin, 
 who usually signs as 
 S.B.