From: kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran)
Subject: The Suffering Of Some Dental Patients And Their Bills...
Summary: In which Nyikos once agains does the backpedel shuffle... 
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Keywords: You expect me to mark my deletions?  Dream on... 
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 92 17:51:00 GMT

In article <nyikos.718176873@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
>In <1992Sep28.180212.11160@pwcs.stpaul.gov> chrisl@stpaul.gov (Chris A Lyman) writes:
>>decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
>>> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
>
>>>> I'd like a source that is not so obviously biased as this woman who
>>>> has been the target of several lawsuits, including one where she
>>>> allegedly had a woman held down and performed an abortion on her 
>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> against her will.
>
>>'This woman' being Dr. Mildred Hanson, who, according to her associates,
>>hasn't lost any of these nuisance suits against her.  (I'd like for Peter
>>to explain to me how Dr. Hanson, who is 50+ years old, can hold a younger
>							^^^^^^^^  	
>>woman down on a table by force and put a band-aid on her, much less
>>perform an abortion.)
>
>Boy, Lyman, you don't even care how transparent your misrepresentations
>are, do you?
>
>>> Isn't that sooo convenient?  Last I looked, every time you
>>> posted about one of these lawsuits we discovered they were
>>> just harassment or the case had been thrown out.
>
>There was ONE case like that, and your "discovery" hinged upon the
>word of one of Hanson's assistants.

Of course, Hanson's assistants are *BIASED*, and *NOT A PRIMARY SOURCE*,
so Peter doesn't believe them...

>>>  Remember the
>>> one you posted about the woman who claimed they never informed
>>> her of cancer, where the court found that the clinic had
>>> tried for months to inform the woman that she had it?
>
>Right, that was the case, but unless I missed a post of yours, the
>only evidence the court "found" these things was the word of the
>assistant of Mildred Hanson.

*WHO IS BIASED, AND SHOULDN'T BE BELIEVED, DAMMIT!*  (Come on, Peter.  We
know you're thinking it...)

>
>>>> BTW does anyone know of the present status of THIS lawsuit?  My sources
>>>> are over a year old, and at that time it was still pending.
>
>>> I'm surprised you even care.
>
>>I asked Peter to post the names of the plaintiff(s) in these lawsuits, so
>>I could check the public record.  He never responded.
>
>Ah, so, apparently I did miss a post.  The name was Kathleen Marie
>Maki, and these lawsuits can drag out for years.  The abortionist
>of COERCED ABORTION got involved in an unlawful death case that
>dragged on for four years, and finally the State Supreme Court
>ruled that the father of the dead woman could get the award of
>$100,000 that a lower court had awarded long ago.

So Dr. Hanson's clinic was found guilty in an unlawful death suit, or
is this something you're throwing out to try and distract people from your
statement that Dr. Hanson had a woman held to a table and performed an
abortion on her?

For that matter, there are two unlawful death suits in the newspapers
right now in Denver, neither of which are abortion related.  What's
your point?

>
>And the vote was 3-2.

And what is this data point supposed to represent?
--
=kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu | B(0-4) c- d- e++ f- g++ k(+) m r(-) s++(+) t | TSAKC=
=My thoughts, my posts, my ideas, my responsibility, my beer, my pizza.  OK???=
=National Coming Out Day is Oct 11th, 1992. Closets Are A Place To Put Clothes=