HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ace@eisley.wa.com (Ace of Death)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (minor spoilers)
Keywords: y
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 92 23:36:00 PDT
Organization: Mos Eisley Spaceport BBS

daily@a.cs.okstate.edu (DAILY STEPHEN RICH) writes:

> In article <1992Sep7.170616.2107@intacc.uucp> zerobeat@intacc.uucp (Ferenc Sz
> >In article <1992Sep2.065249.4832@cs.mun.ca> georgen@pooky.cs.mun.ca (George 
> >>>
> >>>What is the symbolism of the White Horse that Mrs. Palmer sees in her visi
> >>
> >> The only other time we see Sarah seeing the white horse was when Maddy
> >> was killed and Leland gave her the same type of drink (milk..warm milk?). 
> >> you noticed, it left a residue in the glass.. Leland drugged Sarah so she
> >> wouldn't know that he left the house (to kill Laura). He drugged Sarah in
> >> the series so she wouldn't know he killed Maddy. The White Horse represent
> >> the drug that he gave her I guess (a vision because of the drug).
> >
> >I don't know where the expression "Death rides a white horse" comes from but
> >maybe????  Is it from Revelations?  
> >
> >It would be an extreme stretch to suggest that the white horse has to do wit
> >the white liquid in Sarah's glass.
> >
> >I may be totally wrong but I'm a.....................
> >
> >ferenc
> >
> 
> It's "on a pale horse"  and yes it does come from revelations.  The 4th
> horseman of the apocalypse is Death and corruption who rides a pale horse.
> The first horseman actually is the one on the white horse and represents
> false peace through the anti-christ.  Just to fill in the gaps the second
> horseman is war and rides a red horse and the third is famine & plague and 
> rides a black horse.
> __
> We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.
> SRD
> 

Just for information,  Leland did not drug Sarah the night that he killed 
Laura, it was the night before.  The night when BOB came through her 
window and she discovered that it was her father.


Bye For Now...
           ___  ____  ____           ____   ____     ___  _____  _   _
  /\      /   |/  __||  __|         |  _ \ |  __|   /   ||_   _|| | | |
 /  \    / /| || |   | |__   __  __ | | \ || |__   / /| |  | |  | |_| |
(    )  / __  || |__ | |__  |  ||_  | |_/ || |__  / __  |  | |  |  _  |
 ~/\~  /_/  |_|\____||____| |__||   |____/ |____|/_/  |_|  |_|  |_| |_|
  ~~                ace@eisley.wa.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: roberto@erg.sri.com (Roberto Desimone)
Subject: Re: 007 Quiz-Answers...
Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park, CA
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 21:05:46 GMT

dlee@oasys.dt.navy.mil (David Lee) writes:

>3. Dr. No; From Russia With Love; Goldfinger; Thunderball; You Only Live
>   Twice; On Her Majesty's Secret Service; Diamonds Are Forever; Live and
>   Let Die; The Man With the Golden Gun; The Spy Who Loved Me; Moonraker;
>   For Your Eyes Only; Octopussy; A View To a Kill; The Living Daylights;
>   Licence To Kill....  16 movies

I haven't seen the original question, but wouldn't Casino Royale count.
I realise it wasn't a Cubby Brocoli production, nor did it star Sean
Connery, Roger Moore, George Lazenby or Timothy Dalton.





-- 
Roberto Desimone      roberto@erg.sri.com          Tel: (415) 859-4038
SRI International (EK335), 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27499 rec.martial-arts:12099
From: teexijd@ioe.ac.uk (IAN DAVENPORT)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.martial-arts
Subject: Re: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III
Keywords: What another one?
Date: 12 Sep 92 17:22:10 GMT
Organization: Institute of Education, University of London

In <lb2ftoINNafd@grit.cs.utexas.edu> cmc@cs.utexas.edu (Chi Ming Cheung) writes:


>Do you remember when those previous moives were first shown there were a great
>deal of protests from some public sectors concerning the violence?  They
>claimed that the moives were a bad influence on the kids.  Frankly I never
>understood that.  The old Bugs Bunny cartoons were just as violent and they
>seems to present violence as fun.  I wonder if those protests were a form
>of Japanese bashing.

I wouldn't go that far. In the UK, the most objectional thing seemed to be the 
use of Ninja weaponry, since I believe such weapons were at one sime part of 
the English football hooligans arsenal. This is backed up by the fact that when 
the cartoon version was shown over here, it was renamed Teenage Mutant Hero
Turtles, and all scenes involving Ninja weapons were removed.

>--Ming

Ian J Davenport   MULLARD SPACE SCIENCE LABORATORY    ijd@uk.ac.ucl.mssl
             "I saw that film too, it was 24hrs not 48!"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 15:27:12 GMT
Keywords: n

In article <13SEP199219183618@pavo.concordia.ca> ts_rost@pavo.concordia.ca (TANJA ROSTECK) writes:
>
>Any votes for Van Damme's "Cyborg" as Most Embarassing/Stupid? (Apart from
>mine, that is...)

Hey!  What's wrong with Cyborg?!

"Okay, now that I've made the Ultimate Sacrifice by having myself 
turned into a cyborg, but with better makeup, I can go give the
Secret Formula Stored in my New Robot Brain to the Great Scientists!"

"Why didn't you just write it down and give them the note?"

"Ooops."

GMS
From: bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Robert Church)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Most Maddening Movie
Date: 5 Sep 92 04:03:52 GMT
Organization: Ohio University School of Art. Athens

Well, 'Arizona Heat' is the most disgusting film I've ever seen. I can only
imagine how revolted someone who is gay must be at this piece of dreck.


-- 
*********************************************
*    bob church                             *
*    bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu           *
*    D-8195 NFS #27                         *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gregs@polari.online.com
Subject: Re: Most Maddening Movie
Organization: Seattle Online Public Access Unix.  (206) 328-4944 (all lines telebit-equipped)
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 01:17:49 GMT

gharris@jade.tufts.edu (George W. Harris) writes:

>In article <Sep.2.10.05.10.1992.15589@cadenza.rutgers.edu> masticol@cadenza.rutgers.edu (Steve Masticola) writes:
>>
>>Here's a new topic: which movie made you the angriest? For whatever
>>reason.

Here's another neverending thread, but:

The "Death Wish x" films.  I think there are three?  I've seen bits of
each on cable at various times, and they never cease to anger me.  They
all follow the storyline that goes something like this: Hero needs a reason
to revenge deaths; Viewers must feel revenge is justified; Filmmakers must
show explicit scenes of rape and murder to pull this off.  Junk and Crap,
all.  The makers should be ashamed of themselves.

-- 
Gregory Sumner ~ Seattle, Washington  :: Up, down, turn around
gregs@polari.online.com               :: Please don't let me hit the ground.
:::"Go Dawgs!":::::::::::::::::::::::::::N.O.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
From: cn@otter.hpl.hp.com (Colin Needham)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 05:45:46 GMT
Subject: The Dead List (L-P) Part IV of V
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.
From: wildman@athena.mit.edu (Timothy Worsley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Holden's Eyes (long essay on EYES)
Date: 16 Sep 92 04:03:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: athena.1992Sep16.040345.828
Reply-To: eprice@sql.sybase.com
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu (Eiji Hirai) writes:

>(from memory - don't post stupid followups to correct them)
>"If you could see what I've seen with my eyes." - Roy talking to Sebastian
>at the eye factory

He says "your eyes".  The reason this is not a stupid followup is cuz
"my eyes" doesn't have the cool double meaning of "your eyes".  He was
talking to the dude that made the eyes (not JFS).

Again, sorry, but it's one of the best lines of the film (IMHO) and
the correct wording supports your argument even more.

Ciao,

-Ed (not Tim), eprice@sql.sybase.com (not wildman@...)
From: cn@otter.hpl.hp.com (Colin Needham)
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 06:34:45 GMT
Subject: Re: I Need a Cinema Database
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

cp78067@csie.nctu.edu.tw (82/6/31) writes:
>     I am a movies fan and new to News. I think there must be a complete 
>database recording most movie's data, like the director, actor, actress, etc.
>     If any one knows that, please drop me a message.

Yes, there is. There are seven credit lists posted to r.a.movies on a regular
basis: actors, actresses, dead, directors, writers, composers and
cinematographers. [I will be posting the latest version of the dead list 
later this week]. I have a written a movie database package which uses the
information on the lists to create and search a massive movie database - over
80,000 entries covering more than 20,000 movies!

The lists are available via anonymous ftp from boulder.colorado.edu in the
directory: pub/tv+movies/lists and the latest version of the database scripts
is in the directory: pub/tv+movies/lists/tools. You're local system guru will
be able to help you use anonymous ftp if you don't already know how. Also, to
save bandwidth the files have been compressed so you'll have to "uncompress"
them before you can read them.

Let me know via e-mail if you have any problems,

Cheers,

Col

-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Now you listen to me, I'm an advertising man not a red herring"
  -- Cary Grant, North by Northwest
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Col Needham                |  Phone: +44 272 799910 x 28704
HP Labs                    |  cn@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Bristol                    |  cn@hplabs.hpl.hp.com
U.K.                       |  100022.1126@compuserve.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Subject: Re: "Reservoir Dogs" review. (DO NOT) See this film!
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 03:48:11 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.002213.4738@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au> braca2@cspyr1.cs.adfa.oz.au (BRAY CHRISTOPHER) writes:
>jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu writes:
>
>>BOYCOTT RESERVOIR DOGS! Do not see this film unless you appreciate 
>>unbelievable amounts of ultra-graphic violence, unrelenting racism, and have 
>>a tolerance for deep seated sociopathy. This film is unredeemable 
>>contemptible and sick.
>
>That covers most of the Western Civilisations youth (usually male).  Next
>please.

Western?  Excuse me, but what part of the world would you consider to be
the seat of pacificity?  And would that area not be one of the Totally
Impotent With Regard To Having Some Possibility of Affecting the Rest of
the World?  I wonder if you won't find that those that perpetrate
violence upon other groups are those that can, and that those that 
don't are those that can't.  Just curious.


GMS
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.martial-arts
From: shan@wam.umd.edu (Jake)
Subject: Jackie Chan Movies
Keywords: Movies
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 03:51:53 GMT

If anybody out there in netland could kindly please e-mail me the movies Jackie
Chan did.  And I mean the whole list.  Thanks.  shan@rac1.wam.umd.edu is my
address.
From: rcbi27@marshall.wvnet.edu (DBRUM)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: "Reservoir Dogs" review. (DO NOT) See this film!
Date: 9 Sep 92 23:41:15 GMT
Organization: Marshall University

In article <jjonsson.143@alexandria.lib.utah.edu>, jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu writes:
> In article <1992Sep7.170258.304@dct.ac.uk> mctsrj@dct.ac.uk writes: 
> BOYCOTT RESERVOIR DOGS! Do not see this film unless you appreciate 
> unbelievable amounts of ultra-graphic violence, unrelenting racism, and have 
> a tolerance for deep seated sociopathy. This film is unredeemable 
> contemptible and sick.

Oh boy! Sounds almost like another BLUE VELVET or something. I can hardly
wait to see it now!

--danny
-- 
	"Were his solid black square paintings really,
	as the artist claimed, simply neutral, abstract
	compositions devoid of external references and
	meanings?" ***********************************
From: sdt8s@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Steve Tilson)
Subject: To all who have seen Blade Runner: The Director's Cut
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 00:48:41 GMT

Our local cinema was to have obtained a print of this film, but
when their shipment arrived last week, it just wasn't there.

To all of you fortunate enough to have seen it:
You are all overprivileged scum-dogs and don't you forget it.

And if you have our print you better give it back, suckers.

Steve
--
Language is a virus from Outer Space.      |-----------------------------|
And hearing your name                      | Steve Tilson                |
Is better                                  | sdt8s@poe.acc.virginia.edu  |
Than seeing your face.   (Laurie Anderson) |-----------------------------|
From: knude@daimi.aau.dk (Per Knudsgaard)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Highlander III.
Summary: Interview with C Lambert.
Keywords: interview Lambert
Date: 7 Sep 92 21:24:42 GMT
Organization: DAIMI: Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, Denmark


   Hi,

   MTV Europe's The Big Picture featured a short interview with Christofer Lambert
about HIGHLANDER III. I tumbled into the interview towards the end(ZAP), so if there 
is anything wrong with the following - beyond the fact that they are making a 
followup to HIGHLANDER II, the sickening - I appologize.

   As said, it was towards the end and there was little with substance in what I 
heard. He said that "they" realized that H.II was bad, and that the approach this
time was more like H.I. In his view that means less fireworks, and more story. 
I heard nothing about the shooting schedule, and have no idea if they have started,
or when it will be released.

   Thats about it - I know it wasn't much, sorry. More info will be appreciated...


   Per Knudsgaard, knude@daimi.aau.dk
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: trm@sactoh0.sac.ca.us (Tara R. Marchand)
Subject: Comments on Siesta?
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 18:58:46 GMT

writes:

Subject: Comments on _Siesta_?

I just finished watching _Siesta_, which stars Ellen Barkin, Gabriel Byrne,
Julian Sands, and Jodi Fostr.  Isabella Rosselini, Martin Sheen, Grace
Jones, and Alexei Sayle also appear.  The film chronicles te disorientation
a woman experiences after waking up alone in the desert.  Bit by bit, she
remembers the events of the past few days, wandering around in a daze.  She
is helped along by some other foreigners and finally manages to recall all
that transpired.

I enjoyed the film; I found it similar to something David Lynch might make.
I was wondering about other people's opinions of the movie.  Did you like
it?  Why or why not?  What were the best and worst parts of the film?

Saw this a couple years ago.  Kinda fascinating.  (Side note:
aren't Byrne & Barkin married/divorced/separated and/or parenting
together?)  (Another side note:  Wasn't Byrne incredible in
"Miller's Crossing", and did he get any recognition at all for his
performance?)  I think Barkin's really cool.   Now in retrospect, it
reminds me quite a bit of:  POSSIBLE SPOILER










Jacob's Ladder.   In both movies what intrigued me was the whole
dying dream sequence, the meshing of conscious and unconscious.  It
is not a favorite theme in movies for some people, my husband for
instance, but like I said, it fascinates me.  I'll have to look up
who directed Siesta, I don't remember.  Another side note:  I think
Byrne and Sands play Byron and Shelley in another movie (or was it
in this one?  lots of intertextuality it seemed.)  Oh well.  I'd
like to read some other reactions to Siesta as well.
From: 910252m@ace.acadiau.ca (DWAYNE ALLAN MACKINNON)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Name this Movie
Summary: It's NOT Crossroads
Date: 11 Sep 92 13:09:44 GMT
Organization: Acadia University

Just thought I'd let you know that the movie you're thinking of is Hiding 
Out, just like some guy already said. That roller-skating scene pegs it dead 
on. It stars Jon Cryer, not Ralph Macchio. It wasn't half bad. I've spent an 
hour and a half viewing worse things (such as Death Becomes Her. Avoid that 
movie like the Plague!!!!!!)


DMK
Acadia University, N.S., Canada.
From: le01167@portal.lasc.lockheed.com (Ron Nadel (x2025))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Blade Runner: What's the significance of Unicorns? (*SPOILER*)
Date: 15 Sep 92 18:16:26 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Co. - Rye Canyon
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <14SEP199217244758@moose.cccs.umn.edu>, rao@moose.cccs.umn.edu writes...

>I haven't read the book, so I have no idea what the Unicorns mean.  Could
>someone who knows PLEASE explain their significance in BR?  It's driving me
>CRAZY! :-)

There are two meanings to the Unicorn, originally from an idea that Scott had
intended (but cut out, and now put back in), and the other was the modification
that initially resulted from the cut of that original idea.

Initially, Scott wanted Deckerd to have a dream containing a Unicorn.  This dream
would add the nice ambiguous touch that maybe Deckerd himself is a replicant and
his memories have been messed with.  The ending would have him find the Unicorn
origami figure and thus have meaning for him.

The modification was a good one, I think.  In this one, the Olmos detective character
sort of entertains himself by making these miniature origami.  At the end, believing 
that the police will try to find the girl and terminate her, Deckerd catches sight of
the origami on the floor, and then realizes that the police (Olmos) had been there, 
and let her live.


Ron
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27449 alt.cult-movies:7747
From: michael@adriaan.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Movies you heard were good but sucked (was Re: Most Embarassing Movie)
Date: 11 Sep 92 20:50:56 GMT
	<JASON.92Sep4144357@ab20.larc.nasa.gov>
	<sbarnhar-040992151951@morril6t-10.micro.umn.edu>
	<1992Sep9.185510.26219@b23a.b23a.ingr.com>
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Organization: Boston University
In-reply-to: alfa@b23a.b23a.ingr.com's message of 9 Sep 92 18:55:10 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.185510.26219@b23a.b23a.ingr.com> alfa@b23a.b23a.ingr.com (Laura Pina) writes:

  

  =Chariots of Fire

Just gotta disagree on this one. It certainly isn't a cult film,
true, but it *is* somewhat inspiring to those of us who enjoy that
sort of thing. Which just goes to show that tastes will differ.
   
another $.02,
Chaplin.

--
===========================================================================
Michael Chaplin                    Language is a virus from outer space.
michael@albert.bu.edu                     - William S. Burroughs

The Einstein Papers Project        The opinions contained herein reflect
Boston University                      neither those of the project, 
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.          nor those of Albert Einstein.
From: Laurie Mann
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Bram Stoker's Dracula
Keywords: Coppola, November release, Oldham, Ryder, Hopkins
Date: 15 Sep 92 12:07:23 GMT
Reply-To: lmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com

Francis Ford Coppola gave a presentation on Bram Stoker's Dracula
at MagiCon.  His talk was preceded by a 12-minute short on the making
of the movie.  The movie looks pretty interesting---while it is supposed
to be true to the book, the movie has a strongly-erotic feel to it.

The movie stars Gary Oldham as the Count, Anthony Hopkins as
van Helsing, and Winona Ryder as one of the women beguiled by
Dracula.  It is due out just before Thanksgiving

Coppola says the movie is more about the characters than about
horror.  He also says all the special effects were made in
the "old-fashion" way.  There's no computer-morphing techniques or
anything like that.

*  NeXT: lmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com * GEnie:  Laurie.Mann  *
**** Vote to can George and Dan! **  Vote for CHANGE in 1992!****
**********    Member of the cultural elite and PROUD!  **********
From: ca572@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark L. Stackpole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Movies you heard were good but sucked (was Re: Most Embarassing Movie)
Date: 11 Sep 1992 21:55:21 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


The Princess Bride
From: guest@iat.holonet.net (HoloNet Guest Services)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: REVIEW: HONEYMOON IN VEGAS
Date: 11 Sep 92 03:46:12 GMT
Organization: HoloNet (BBS: 510-704-1058)

While, yes Honeymoon in Vegas was not exactly the most exciting of movies,
in terms of the stupidity of the preview I saw twop weeks ago (flying
Elvises?) and in terms of the rest of the crap put out this summer
(Batman2), I at least think that H in V was a very entertaining movie, and
I don't think that many people left the theatre at least happy that they
saw it, in light of poor cinematography noted in the review; I give the
movie a + 2.5
From: Mike_Quigley@mindlink.bc.ca (Mike Quigley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: What movies do to cities...
Date: 12 Sep 92 15:35:28 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada

Since Vancouver BC is used more and more often as a film location (usually
transformed into "Seattle" as someone mentioned), there are lots of wacky jumps
from one location to another. I remember a terrible movie which starred Irene
Cara and, I think, Tatum O'Neal, where the two of them went underground (like
into a manhole) in New Westminster, about 10 miles to the southeast of
Vancouver, and emerged seconds later on Granville Street, which is Vancouver's
main drag downtown!
From: tcarter@seismo.CSS.GOV (Thomas Carter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Mixed Up Movie Titles
Keywords: None
Date: 14 Sep 92 22:37:24 GMT
Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA



    Overheard in a video store...

    "Do you have 'Dangerous Lesions'?"

    A good chuckle was had by all.




-- 
________________________________________________________________________________
Thomas B. Carter                          |  Center for Seismic Studies
My wife calls this the Nut-Net...         |  tcarter@beno.css.gov             
________________________________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: George A Romero's Zombie films
Date: 15 Sep 92 18:09:27 GMT
Reply-To: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies

In article <1992Sep7.144231.17607@syma.sussex.ac.uk>,
nealet@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Neale Type) writes:
|>
|>Hi,
|>
|>What are the series of Zombie films made by George A Romero, and what
|>order do they come in ???
|>
|>I know that Dawn of the Dead was one, made about 1978(ish?) and I heard
|>that he makes another zombie film ever 10 years... is there any truth in
|>this rumour ??
|>

   Romero's zombie trilogy is as follows:

Night of the Living Dead (1969,  + a colourised version in 1990)
Dawn of the Dead (GB title "Zombies") (1976, I guess)
Day of the Dead (1988)

   He is rumoured to be making a 4th (Twighlight of the Dead??) film
after being displeased with the way the third turned out.

   Also worth mentioning: "The Crazies" (197?) is basically a zombie
film by Romero, as is the first story in "Two Evil Eyes" (1990).


                  
+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Gary Bradley        |   "You receive a love letter from me and |
| ORACLE Corp, UK     |                  you're f*cked forever!" |
| Edinburgh, SCOTLAND |        - Frank Booth ("Blue Velvet")     |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| "God damn the censor man"                                      |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+