HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: keegan@windsurf.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: kebbie cornered again (was Re: The Idiots _Join_ Kevin Darcy (was Re: Idiots vs. Kevin Darcy)
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:44:20 GMT
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> keegan@CRD.GE.COM (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:

-> >References: <1992Mar20.024954.17278@access.digex.com> <1992Mar22.230927.6947@rotag.mi.org> <1992Mar28.161445.12107@access.digex.com>
-> >
-> >in <1992Mar29.072536.26587@rotag.mi.org>, kevin darcy writes to q:
-> >-> I never did this. You've repeatedly claimed that I did,
-> >-> but you could never produce any evidence for your claim,
-> >-> when asked. Your allegation has been dismissed long since.
-> >
-> >if this is so, then i'm sure you'll agree that all
-> >allegations made by those too dishonest or confused to
-> >support their allegations should likewise be dismissed. do
-> >you agree that this is the case?
-> 
-> No, I do not agree with your simplistic formulation. An
-> unsupported allegation remains in an indefinite "pending
-> state" until the subject of the allegation makes a SOLEMN,
-> GOOD-FAITH denial. Only then is the alleger obligated to
-> expend time and energy to support the allegation.

i believe that you've already proven that you do not mean what
you wrote in the previous paragraph. the post appended to this
article has been reposted over a dozen times. 

so, kebbie, the ball is in your court. will you withdraw your
lie?

==================================begin included post
From keegan@ukulele (James G Keegan Jr) Wed Feb 26 12:46:32 1992
From: keegan@ukulele.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame
Subject: a darcy lie
Summary: another kevin darcy lie
Keywords: darcy, lie
Date: 26 Feb 92 16:27:01 GMT
Reply-To: keegan@ukulele.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

kevin@cfctech (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> Is this the same James Keegan who donned his net.cop badge and
-> uniform, and told me to get "my" [sic] child-support threads
-> out of t.a this past December??

i deny that i told you to get your "child-support threads out of
t.a. this past December."

please support your charge that i did so.

        "I provide all of the necessary evidence for every claim
        I make, or retract it."
			Kevin Darcy
			<1992Feb11.054339.25284@rotag.mi.org>

put up or shut up lad.

----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.

======end included post

--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinsn@alqualonde.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Regrets
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 03:51:43 GMT

In article <8sa9iB9w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca (Gene Ward Smith) writes:
>
>> This suggests an interesting contest--just how small is the Karnes
>> vocabulary? When that becomes boring, just how small is the Karnes
>> penis? Could these become useful devices for measurement? One might
>> lay claim to a vocabulary of 8 Karnes, a penis of 17 Karnes, and an
>> IQ of 106 Karnes, for instance.
>> 
>
>
>You know what we have in common....? The number 36...
>
>My waistline, and your IQ. :)

Looks like Dan needs some exercise. 36 waistline == too many fat cells.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.sex,alt.flame
From: 7741cs17@uhdvx3.dt.uh.edu (SILICON VULTURE)
Subject: Re: Homophopes/Hetrophobes?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41A   
Organization: University of Houston-Downtown
X-Lunar-Date: 3 days, 7 hours, 2 minutes since the first quarter of the moon
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 00:24:00 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.164917.8154@wam.umd.edu>, aap@wam.umd.edu
(Alberto Adolfo Pinkas) writes...

>I am sure that men and women are different.
>Does it make men and women hate each other because "sexuals(?) and non
>sexuals hate what is different."?

This reminds me of a saying I heard as a child:  The war between the sexes
will never be won because there is too much fraternization with the enemy.

Perhaps that answers your question about why men and women don't hate each
other.

It is my feeling that it is easy to hate something you don't understand.
In my group of friends (homosexuals, heterosexuals, and bisexuals), there
is no hatred for any preference because everyone has learned where the
other people are coming from.  It's just a matter of taking the time to
listen to the other person's story.

  |  Silicon Vulture            |  Disclaimer:  UHD and SLEH would have to  |
  |  7741cs17@uhdvx3.dt.uh.edu  |       pay me to use my opinions.          |

Xref: sparky alt.flame:6392 alt.politics.homosexuality:1880
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:11:10 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <s38iiB2w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM>, djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM blithers:
> 
> dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
> 
> > Now, the story has changed.  Suddenly, idiot goes from saying "homosexuals
> > cannot have children", a patently false statement, to "homosexuals cannot
> > have children who share the DNA of both parents."  The second statement is
> > true, but rather irrelevant.
> 
> You are WRONG sir. A homosexual can hire/rent/beg for the appropriate
> organ or whatever but there are no natural children born to any of
> you regardless of what bullshit you invoke to try and prove your lost
> cause.

Huh?  You must be using some definition of the words "natural" and "children"
which is substantially different than the ones I'm familiar with.

Which is the more natural child, Danny-boy?  One conceived by a lesbian
mother through the "assistance" of a homosexual male friend, or one
adopted by an infertile heterosexual couple?

Feel free to take your time to think this through.  I know you're not used
to rubbing those two neurons together, and the friction may be a little
unpleasant at first.

> You are pathetic.

How is it possible for someone to be so thick and so shallow at the same time?

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar)
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 03:00:13 GMT

In article <LeXwiB3w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
>> Do you have an issue with two men kissing being on the cover of a magazine?
>I do.. A gag reflex. (sorry Jeff!)

All it takes is practice, Daniel. Relaxation.

Start with a banana. A warm, tasty banana. Put it in your mouth. Slide
it down your throat. Try to get it past the entrance to your throat.
You will gag. Take it out, relax your throat some more, and try again.

When you become reasonably adept at that, try it with a real cock.
It's best if you are upside down with respect to your partner - face
pointed towards the toes. Open your mouth, suck the cock generously,
and then slide it down your throat. Really, it's easy, and fun!

>-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------

Must explain why you're having such a hard time with one of the oldest
problems of all. Give me a call if you want to try some of that
innovation on me, sugar.

why are you Nitro.CtEdge.COM and not nitro.ctedge.com?
-- 
                __
nelson@reed.edu \/                   There is absolutely no other possibility
From: farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Big Bri)
Subject: Re: HOMOSEXUALITY IS ECONOMICALLY ADVANTAGEOUS
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 18:07:13 GMT

karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) writes:

>> If heterosexuality is inherently "bad" and homosexuality is inherently        
>> "good",
>> how do the phobes justify the existence of bisexuality.

>Perhaps you're just inherently stupid.

Maybe I'm inherently stupid for expecting some people to respond to this
question in an intelligent manner.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
BRI FARENELL	CLARKSON '95		FARENEBT@CRAFT.CAMP.CLARKSON.EDU
A bleeding heart liberal card-carrying member of the ACLU.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The most violent element of society is ignorance."
	---Emma Goldman	(possibly refering to Jesse Helms)

"Political campaigns now are so simplistic and superficial, Mr Candidate.
 In the 20 seconds we have left, could you tell us why?"
	---Political cartoon		
 
"Yassir Arafat had a terrible accident. He tried to fax a mail bomb...."
	---Johnny Carson




Xref: sparky alt.sex:14199 alt.flame:6590
From: ruderman@kira.egr.msu.edu (Greg Ruderman)
Newsgroups: alt.sex,alt.flame
Subject: Re: Homophopes/Hetrophobes?
Date: 12 Apr 92 15:45:38 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Michigan State University, College of Engineering

In article <1992Apr11.190500.22971@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> rdavis@lonestar.utsa.edu (Roger P. Davis) writes:
>
>    Would someone tell me -- in 100 words or less -- why homosexuals hate
>hetrosexuals/hetrosexuals hate homosexuals/everyone sexuals seem to hate
>everyone else sexuals?  Remember, 100 words or less.  And the question is
>WHY not HOW MUCH.
>
>
>-- 

okay, WHY WHY WHY don't bi's fit into your little picture here?

	And, from what little exposure i've had, i know that many homosexuals
	have little respect for bi's. The reasoning i can only guess at: that
	by being gay one is taking enormous risks, personal and socail, and that by being bi, one is `chickening out', only going half way and perhaps belittling all that being gay stands for. But that's only my personal conclusion.
	Gays seems to hate straights because of all the abuse theyve suffered at their hands.
	Straights seem to fear gays because of the newness, the scariness
	of someone being UNLIKE oneself.

	Kira.
From: krobinsn@carn-dum.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: OGGLEs Are FUCKING LAME!
Keywords: Rick plays with blocks
Date: 17 Apr 92 16:56:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.-g6H=s3t6
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <9204150814.35@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>In article <ya3Hrr&p6@cs.psu.edu> krobinsn@alqualonde.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <9204131109.23@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>>In article <cz6H&r#o6@cs.psu.edu> krobinsn@cirith-ungol.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>In article <9204120857.40@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>>>>In article <skHtf9o6@cs.psu.edu> Jacob A. Vanier <vanier@cs.psu.edu> writes:
>>>>>>X-Political-Statement: Barry G. Morgan for President in 2032!
>
>>>>>>>And you are a misanthrope.
>
>>>>>>Again I read more misrepresentations, dissimulations, ungrounded, and unfounded
>>>>>>statements.  K e n does not despise, detest, nor loathe mankind.  Nay, K e n 
>>>>>>finds great humor and amusement from the lowly plebians who think themselves
>>>>>>worthy of corresponding with him.  Their hypocrisy, and their lack of knowledge
>>>>>>in such simple tasks as flaming and educating their peers will never cease to 
>>>>>>amuse K e n in his daily routine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Rick eloquently demonstrates that he is misinformed.  No more needs to be said!
>>>>>
>>>>>And you're ken's halfwit brother?
>>>>
>>>>No, you are quite misinformed again, Rick. Jake is an informed individual,
>>>>something you wish you could be, but due to a massive need of repairs
>>>>it seems as if you could never attain such a high level of being.
>>>
>>>You didn't answer the question.
>>
>>Yes I did. I said you were misinformed. Is it that hard to extrapolate
>>that I am not Jake's brother?? The first sentence said it all. Think
>>before posting, Rick.
>
>Ever since you saw the word "misinformed" in Reader's Digest, you haven't
>been able to stop writing it down.

But it describes the state that you are in right now: completely misinformed.

>>>Do you speak for Jake?
>>
>>No, I speak for alt.flame. What do you speak for?
>
>Jake originated the article.
>
>Oh, I forgot about your reading problems.

That is besides the point. I speak for alt.flame. What do you speak for?

>>>>>Why don't you go help him with his toilet worship?
>>>>
>>>>Toilets are not used for worshipping. Toilets are used for desposing
>>>>excrement and other body wastes. It is quite apparent that you are
>>>>indeed, misinformed.
>>>
>>>So why the fascination?
>>
>>Why don't you ask yourself. Maybe you might get an answer, although the
>>odds are against it.
>
>You are the one who brought the subject into alt.flame.
>
>Oh, I forgot about your short term memory problems.

Prove it. It is highly unlikely that you could.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: jjj@mits.mdata.fi (Joni Jarvenkyla)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: The Following Letter Was Sent To Major Newspapers/Journals,...
Date: 14 Apr 92 10:10:39 GMT
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland

>Newsgroups: soc.culture.turkish,talk.politics.mideast,talk.politics.soviet,soc.culture.soviet,soc.culture.greek,soc.culture.europe,soc.history,soc.rights.human

In article <m0laHjO-0003YPC@ddsw1.mcs.com> hbm@ddsw1.UUCP (Hasan B
Mutlu) writes:
>
>On April 13 of every year, the people of Turkiye remember
>their dead. They grieve for lost family and the lost homes
>of their grandfathers. This year the Turkish Nation is mourning 
>and praying again for her fallen heroes who gave their lives 
>generously and with altruism, so that the future generations 
>may live on that anointed soil of the Turkish land happily and 
>prosperously.
>
>The following letter was sent to major newspapers/journals, columnists 
>and TV program directors for the recognition of the Turkish Genocide.

This guy must be one of the biggest assholes on the whole net: feeding
day clear Turkish propaganda to several groups all the time, changing
subject lines in his every fucking posting and just continuing his
mission without caring a shit of all the people who ask him to stop.

Why is he allowed, at all?

I just start to feel sad that he wasn't genocided, too.


-- 
jjj@mits.mdata.fi   Mind         Heart         No      Me
jjj@niksula.hut.fi  Difference   Destruction   Death   You
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6537 talk.abortion:14560
From: keegan@sunroof.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig when he is exposed in another lie (was Re: Keegan Stoops to Attempted Fraud)
Date: 11 Apr 92 11:43:56 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

In article <1992Apr11.064737.6331@rotag.mi.org>
	kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> In article <1992Apr7.215030.3811@crd.ge.com> keegan@windsurf.crd.ge.com 
-> (James G Keegan Jr) purported to reproduce an article of mine,
-> <1992Apr4.181043.18607@rotag.mi.org> verbatim. However,
-> further inspection reveals that the following paragraph (and
-> the following paragraph) was missing from that "verbatim"
-> reproduction:

kevin, stop lying and whining. i never claimed anything was
"verbatim" in article 1992Apr7.215030.3811@crd.ge.com. i did,
however, in that article demonstrate that you are a liar. as you
are again in this silly attempt to weasel out of the lie you were
exposed in. you are not only a liar. you are a characterless
twit.

here is a verbatim reproduction for you -- it is the article you
claim that i claimed to make a "verbatim" reproduction. do you
see the word "verbatim" kevin? to you see any reference to the
concept of verbatim kevin?

you are a fucking liar.

=======begin verbatim article===========

From rdsunx.crd.ge.com!windsurf!keegan Tue Apr  7 19:49:12 EDT 1992
Article: 588 of alt.flame
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: keegan@windsurf.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Subject: giving kebbie a chance to tell the truth (was Re: Giving Jimmy a Chance for Redemption (was Re: The Kevster Wishes More Legal Advice))
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 21:50:30 GMT

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> keegan@rosebud.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
-> >sea-wolf@deathstar.com (Sea Wolf) writes:
-> >>Hint: Q is a habitual liar.  
-> >
-> >i've seen no evidence of this. and you've offered none.
-> >darcy, on the other hand, shown himself to be a liar quite
-> >frequently.
-> 
-> Remember what you said:
-> 
-> "btw, i did not support my statement [...] in this post. why don't you 
->  ask that i do so. i'll be pleased to comply with that request. anyone 
->  who wouldn't is a liar, or coward, or both. don't you agree?"
-> 						<9crrdha@rpi.edu>
-> 
-> I'm asking that you support your statement that I have "shown [myself] to
-> be a liar". Are you a "liar, or coward, or both", Jimmy???

sure.

i'm happy to comply. you lied about me. the following post,
calling you on your lie has been reposted several times. you have
yet to withdraw your claim and apologize. you lied.

=============begin included post
>From keegan@ukulele (James G Keegan Jr) Wed Feb 26 12:46:32 1992
From: keegan@ukulele.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame
Subject: a darcy lie
Summary: another kevin darcy lie
Keywords: darcy, lie
Date: 26 Feb 92 16:27:01 GMT
Reply-To: keegan@ukulele.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

kevin@cfctech (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> Is this the same James Keegan who donned his net.cop badge and
-> uniform, and told me to get "my" [sic] child-support threads
-> out of t.a this past December??

i deny that i told you to get your "child-support threads out of
t.a. this past December."

please support your charge that i did so.

        "I provide all of the necessary evidence for every claim
        I make, or retract it."
			Kevin Darcy
			<1992Feb11.054339.25284@rotag.mi.org>

put up or shut up lad.

----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
======end included post
--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
=============end verbatim article========

--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
From: karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: does a convenient absence of Keegan's brains excuse his stupidity?
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:13:25 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr8.101326.691

In article <1992Apr8.022439.1979@crd.ge.com>  writes:

> well, well, what a convenient time to be away.

Convenient for you, maybe. I'm sure you never had a Spring Break,
Keegan, given the overall stuffyness your personality projects.
 
> now that you're "back," i'm sure you'll be dealing with all of
> your unfinished business. or, i suppose you could take the same
> approach as kebbin.

What a bunch of tripe.  Isn't it just like you to tell others
what their business is!  Who or what, may I ask, made you the
Guardian Keeper of alt.flame?
  
Humor me and tell me what my "unfinished business" might be,
Captain Alt.flame.


Karsten Hendrick
karsten@nic.gac.edu
karsten@lavatch.gac.edu
Xref: sparky alt.sex:14935 alt.flame:7043
From: djk@homophobes.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.sex,alt.flame
Subject: Re: Homophopes/Hetrophobes?
Date: 16 Apr 92 18:31:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: homophob.Z4eDJB14w164w
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

ses3n@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Sharon Elizabeth Silverman) writes:

> Why people hate those of different orientations, in 100 words?
> No problem:
> 
> They lack information, and so they are scared.
>
>                                               Sharon
> 						(an open-minded bi)

If it makes you feel better to think that..  Enjoy yourself.

-djk
(an open-minded straight)

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@homophobes.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!homophobes!Djk ------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
From: dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This newsgroup has gone to hell!
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 11:42:44 GMT
Reply-To: munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac
FollowUp-To: alt.flame
 <BMox11.D3L@world.std.com>
Keywords: 
Organization: More like Dis~, really.

In article <BMox11.D3L@world.std.com>, Bis writes:

> In article <1ad87389.ARN187d@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au> munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac writes:
> >In article <22603@goofy.Apple.COM>, Lefty writes:
> >You're posting several trillion times more than you usually do.
> >This is not necessarily a good or bad trait; it is unusual
> >though. 
> 
> Bullshit.  Posting infrequently was his most redeeming trait.
> 
> For a while, not posting at all was yours.  But now you've ruined that.

  &&&&&                                            &&     
 &&   &&                                           &&     
 &&&       &&&  &&    &&&&&     &&&&&      &&&&&   &&&&&& 
   &&&     &&&&&&&&  &&   &&   &&   &&    &&       &&   &&
     &&&   && && &&  &&   &&   &&   &&    &&       &&   &&
 &&   &&   &&    &&  &&   &&   &&   &&    &&       &&   &&
  &&&&&    &&    &&   &&&&&     &&&&&      &&&&&   &&   &&
                                                                      
Now be a good chump, and go play in the traffic.

Dac
--
munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac      David Andrew Clayton.           // _| _  _
  prolix!dac%eyrie@labtam.oz.au      Canberra, Australia           \X/ (_](_](_
        dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au      I post .
prolix!dac@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au            . . I am.             +61 6 290 2215
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6484 alt.politics.homosexuality:1966
From: fellers@utkvx2.utk.edu (Michael Fellers, University of Tennessee)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: 10 Apr 92 18:31:00 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee Computing Center
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <qT1ZiB1w164w@Bogus.COM>, punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes...
>dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
> 
>> Still wrong.  The child exists... Therefore, it is biological.
> 
>Not from both of you.  As I say, you cannot have a natural birth.


	Point?


>You can adopt, and all that.  But, it DOES take a woman to get a kid, and
>in your little world, you are the "wife", and that just don't work like that.


	You're relevence to the subject?


>Why can't you just say it?  Nope, everything has to be exactly the SAME as
>the rest of the heterosexual world.  Why do you try so hard to insist that
>what is different is the same?


	We don't.  We know that we aren't the same.  We just are trying to
assert that one isn't better than the other.


>Why can't you see it like it is?  Different...  If you have a problem with
>being different, than how do you expect others to accept you.

	I have no problem being different.  I have a problem with someone
telling me that I shouldn't be allowed to raise a child because I am different.


>> I did.  It still was bigotted.
> 
>Naw, I don't think so.

	I do.  The topic of this thread was started when certain heterosexuals
stated that homosexuals shouldn't be parents.  They have yet to show why.


>===
>* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
>My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.

						Michael Fellers
						fellers@utkvx.utk.edu
From: trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Hell is Cleveland (was Re: This newsgroup has gone to hell!)
Date: 9 Apr 92 12:26:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: crud.29e386b9.crud
Organization: Stuck with a PC-clone (St. Paul, Minnesota, USA)

In article <1992Apr04.235339.32506@yuma.acns.colostate.edu>
        maxwell@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Mark Story) writes:

]I have read a great variety of newsgroups looking for a humorous escape from
]daily stress.  Well, it appears that I have found the ultimate.

If you want humor, try soc.men.

]On occasion
]you find an intelligent discussion here, but that seems to be an ever-
]increasing rarity.  Why not rename this group alt.moron.talk?  Others of
]you would probably prefer alt.moron.homophobia.  

It has grown noisy this semester.  Still, so long as there are bulk
deletion commands we shall survive.


--
Barry Schwartz        trashman@crud.mn.org