HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jy10033@ehsn20.cen.uiuc.edu (Joshua M Yelon)
Subject: Kernel SLIP
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 21:22:40 GMT

Is anybody working on kernel-mode SLIP?

Yes, I know that this is about the umpteenth time that this question
has been asked.  I want you all to know that before I posted this
note, I

	1. Scanned the mail archives for an answer, to no avail.
	2. Did a string search through the FAQ and the FAQ.serial,
	3. Tried to find the project registry, which is missing,
	4. Mailed to the maintainer of the registry (illegal mail address),
	5. Hired a Hypnotist to extract the information from my subconcious.

So don't flame me for posting an FAQ.

PS.  If the project registry is dead, somebody should correct the
meta-faq (which told me about the registry).
From: hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: SIG[SEG,BUS]
Date: 30 Sep 92 18:26:21 GMT
Organization: School of EECS, Washington State University

In article <cemQqPy00WAJRfXTVx@andrew.cmu.edu>, geek+@CMU.EDU (Brian E. Gallew) writes:
|> Are there any plans for supporting SIGSEG and SIGBUS?  HLU?
|> 
|>                                   -Brian
|> 
|> You drop the bomb -more-
|> It goes off... -more-

I don't see any since they are not in POSIX. Just do

#ifdef SIGSEG
	signal (SIGSEG, foo);
#endif 

H.J.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: ramesh@utdallas.edu (R. Ramesh)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Diamond SVGA Cards
Date: 29 Sep 92 22:47:50 GMT
Article-I.D.: utdallas.1992Sep29.224750.18838
Reply-To: ramesh@utdallas.edu
Organization: The University of Texas at Dallas, ACC

In article <1992Sep29.000947.17731@news.dfrf.nasa.gov>, blee@halon.dfrf.nasa.gov (Bryson Lee) writes:
|> I don't mean to reopen any festering sores with this post, but I'm hoping to
|> get some info that I think came out here a while back.  After failing to get
|> a TsengLabs VGA Mentor card to work reliably with my PC (either under DOS or
|> Linux), I have purchased a Diamond Speedstar Plus w/512K.  Considering some of
|> the discussions about that vendor in the last few weeks, I had reservations,
|> but the price was right and the return policy excellent.
|> 
|> Anyway, the card seemed to work a treat after I installed it and fired up 
|> Linux (the SLS 0.96c_pl2 variety, BTW).  It did X at 640x480 physical (800x600
|> virtual) with no problems.  However, once I rebooted into DOS to check 
|> operation there and then went back to Linux, the server would hang during 
|> startup and force me to reboot the machine.  If I then went back and tried to
|> run at a virtual resolution higher than the card would support, let it fail, 
|> and tried again at 800x600, things once again worked fine.  I guess this 
|> problem is related to clocks on the card, but I'm not sure.  
|> 
|> If someone could mail me a recap of the problems with Diamond ET4000 cards, it
|> would help me decide if I should write this one off and try another vendor,
|> or live within this card's limitations.
|> 
|> Thanks in advance,
|> 
|> Bryson Lee
|> blee@halon.dfrf.nasa.gov
|> 


I was told that speedstar+ and new ET4000 cards come with programmable clocks.
At boot time typically only few of the 8 (or 16) are programmed and others
are left at random (?) values. If you access one of those values iwthout
knowing what it can do,the result can be unexpected. This probably explains
why xv1.0 runs on my card and v2.0 doesn't. 

In your case trying an impossible resolution may trigger the setting of all
clocks - Don't quote me, I am just trying to explain with very little
knowledge I have on these beasts.

Ramesh
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: S_TITZ@iravcl.ira.uka.de (Olaf Titz)
Subject: Re: DOS emulation under PD unix..
Organization: Fachschaft Informatik, Uni Karlsruhe
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 12:11:43 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.23

In <1992Sep26.101345.2935@donau.et.tudelft.nl> robn@liberator.et.tudelft.nl writes:

>  S_TITZ@iravcl.ira.uka.de (Olaf Titz) writes:
>  
>  >[from comp.unix.dos-under-unix - followup to comp.os.linux]
>  >features can equally replace MS Windows. Usually a DOS emulation is
>  >needed to run one or two application which still can not be replaced
>  >(dviscr from emTeX comes to my mind...)
>  
>  How about xdvi ?  Works ok for me.

Ever tried dviscr? It's BEAUTIFUL... It does anti-aliasing with the
fonts when shrinking so that you can have 2/3 of an A4 page on the
screen and still well read 10pt fonts... no X thing I know does this.
(And, btw, I don't have the necessary hardware for X and can well get
along without it, if it were not for TeX...)


MfG,
        Olaf
-- 
    o     Olaf Titz - comp.sc.student - univ of karlsruhe - germany
 _ /<_    s_titz@iravcl.ira.uka.de - uknf@dkauni2.bitnet - praetorius@irc
(_)>(_)   +49-721-60439 - did i forget something?
It is impossible to make something foolproof because fools are so ingenious. 
 - gwydion@gnu.ai.mit.edu
From: WSC93ISX06@RCNVMS.RCN.MASS.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: trouble installing new GCC
Date: 6 Oct 92 03:51:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: athena.1992Oct6.035139.5818
Reply-To: WSC93ISX06@RCNVMS.RCN.MASS.EDU
Organization: The Internet

I got the new GCC from tsx-11 a few weeks ago and have just tried to install it.
~b
I am having some trouble:
Linux 0.97-11, upgraded from MCC 0.96c some time ago.
GCC 2.2.2d w/ 4.1 jump tables, unpacked under /
according to changelog, I should do this:
 ln -s /include/linux /usr/include/linux
 ln -s /include/asm /usr/include/asm
 sh /lib-4.1.sh
~but the last command yields usage: sh /lib-4.1.sh [-v] []
note: "sh" must be linked to bash.
It is linked to bash. I am I missing something? Am I using the right install
script? Did I unpack this correctly? I am sort of new at linux, and I am 
running this on a very small system. Any help, publicly or e-mail, would be
apprecialted.
Tanks,
From: hlu@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: KHOROS: (Re: 3 questions !)
Date: 30 Sep 92 06:59:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: serval.1992Sep30.065923.16201
Distribution: world
Organization: Washington State University

In article <1992Sep29.134419.28532@newstand.syr.edu> lruppert@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Your worst nightmare...) writes:
>>
>>		Finally I'd like to know if KHOROS have been tested under linux ? In this
>>case where can I get the binary (cause it requires about 100 Mb of disk space to compile, and
>>I just have about 80 Mb free).
>>
>Good question.  Has anyone tried to do KHOROS?  I'd love a copy if you have.
>>
>>

You must be kidding. I won't compile KHOROS unless I have at least 200
MB free HD. I am running it only under HP 9000/730 with 80 MB RAM. It
is just usable under that kind of resources. Have you noticed how those
glyphs are implemented and connected?

If you really want, I can arrange something. I think I can cross-compile
it from Ultrix to Linux. I have the KHOROS source on line here.

H.J.
-------
P.S. I just found out it hasn't been ported to 386/486 yet.
From: whitney2@husc10.harvard.edu (Wayne Whitney)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: setserial for 0.97.pl6
Summary: Is it available?
Keywords: setserial 0.97pl6
Date: 26 Sep 92 21:34:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: husc10.whitney2.717543261

I'm running 0.97pl6 and just recently got a dumb terminal, so now I
need setserial to set up my modem as 0x3e8 IRQ 5.  I grabbed the
setserial.tar.Z from tsx-11.mit.edu under sources/sbin, and recompiled
it, but the resulting binary complains that all of the ttys devices
are busy when I try to change the settings (it reads the settings OK).
I seem to recall that there were changes to the serial port code in one
of the recent patches, so I was wondering if anyone had a setserial.c
that works with 0.97pl6.  Note that I've gotten the setserial from the
0.97.1 root disk to work with the 0.97pl1 kernel (that's what I'm using
now), so the rest of my setup should be OK.  Thanks very much.

Wayne Whitney
whitney2@husc.harvard.edu
-- 
Wayne Whitney
whitney2@husc.harvard.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: n217cg@tamuts.tamu.edu (Scott Taylor)
Subject: Re: How to: ttys3 w/ IRQ 5??
Followup-To: comp.os.linux
Summary:  get setserial
Keywords: serial
Organization: Texas A&M University
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 13:42:22 GMT

In article <92278.211111MBT3@psuvm.psu.edu> Mike Tierney <MBT3@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>Hi all,
>     I have a modem on /dev/ttys3 (or COM3, depending on how you like to
>look at it), set to use IRQ 5.  I've had consistent trouble trying to get
>it recognized under Linux.  Linux .97p6 detected ttys3, however, it set the
>port as IRQ 4.  Linux .98 does not detect ttys3 at all.  Is there any way
>short of recompiling the kernel to "force" Linux to detect my modem?  If
>recompiling is the way to go, what switches need to be set?
>     Thanks for any help you can give,
>                                   -Mike

Get the program "setserial" from tsx-11.mit.edu or one of the other linux
ftp sites.  It lets you set certain serial port characteristics like IRQ.
Or (if you want to recompile the kernel), edit the struct declaration 
for COM3_ISR (line 48 in kernel/chr_drv/serial.c in the 0.98 sources);
the first number is the IRQ- change it to 5 and recompile.

>    ...sig deleted...

Scott Taylor
n217cg@tamuts.tamu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Werner Almesberger)
Subject: Severe MS-DOS FS bug [+ patch] (was Re: MSDOS file system problem)
Organization: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, CH
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 01:11:06 GMT

In article <1a8ce3INNop2@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> toivo@ucs.uwa.OZ.AU (Toivo Pedaste) writes:
> For example, on a floppy
>	mkdir a b c d e f g h i j
>	mv * a
> will cause a panic.
>
> If I try and mount the disk later it produces 
>
> Panic: Fat error

Indeed, that's a bad one ...

It exists (only) in version alpha.8 of the MS-DOS FS and has been
introduced with the link count computation. A patch for it is at
the end of this posting.

Sorry for the inconvenience ...

- Werner

---------------------------------- cut here -----------------------------------

*** namei.orig	Fri Sep  4 00:05:56 1992
--- namei.c	Fri Oct  2 00:51:57 1992
***************
*** 511,521 ****
  		    MSDOS_I(new_dir)->i_start;
  		dotdot_inode->i_dirt = 1;
  		dotdot_bh->b_dirt = 1;
- 		iput(dotdot_inode);
- 		brelse(dotdot_bh);
  		old_dir->i_nlink--;
  		new_dir->i_nlink++;
  		/* no need to mark them dirty */
  	}
  	error = 0;
  rename_done:
--- 511,522 ----
  		    MSDOS_I(new_dir)->i_start;
  		dotdot_inode->i_dirt = 1;
  		dotdot_bh->b_dirt = 1;
  		old_dir->i_nlink--;
  		new_dir->i_nlink++;
  		/* no need to mark them dirty */
+ 		dotdot_inode->i_nlink = new_dir->i_nlink;
+ 		iput(dotdot_inode);
+ 		brelse(dotdot_bh);
  	}
  	error = 0;
  rename_done:
-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
  / Werner Almesberger, ETH Zuerich, CH      almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch /
 / IFW A44  Tel. +41 1 254 7213                 almesberger@rzvax.ethz.ch /
/_BITNET:_ALMESBER@CZHETH5A__HEPNET/CHADNET:_[20579::]57414::ALMESBERGER_/
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: libc.so.2
From: billp@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu (Bill Parquet)
Date: 5 Oct 92 14:08:09 EST

I've been using linux for about 5 months now, collecting all sorts of stuff
in that time.  Last weekend I decided to clear everything off and install
new versions of all of the utilities (latest kernel, latest GCC, SLS, etc.) 

when I went to compile the kernel, I noticed that "as" wanted "/lib/libc.so.2"
(I'm pretty sure that was the name of the file).  Where does this library come
from?  I didn't see it in any of the packages.  (I went to a backup with the
staticly linked bin tools, so I'm up an running)  But it would be nice to
know where I can find this library.


-- 

billp@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu
---
# rm -r /msdos /os2 /windows.nt
From: osoelgaultier+@CMU.EDU (Stefan Monnier)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Video modes
Date: 26 Sep 92 21:48:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.UelIgii00awV5Kknwz
Organization: Junior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


I plan to get a cheap Unix box. As PCs are generally considered
cheap.....

I read in the FAQ that linux X can use SVGA cards wioth high 
resolutions with 256 colors.
As I only want to use my system in monochrome (it's cheaper
and so easier to read), I'd like to know if a monochrome use 
would be possible (not 256 gray levels: real monochrome).
I need it cause I know that VGA cards are relatively slow
(cause of ISA) and I want a BIG screen (around 1000x900).
Such a big screen with 256 means a lot of memory bandwidth.
And that bandwith is likely to be absent of my ISA bus.

I also would like to know if Motif is available on Linux !

	Stefan Monnier

-----------------------------------------------------
-- On the average, people seem to be acting normal --
-----------------------------------------------------
From: umisef@mcshh.Hanse.DE (Bernd Meyer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: QIC-40 idea...
Date: 5 Oct 92 22:58:22 GMT
Organization: Point of Presence & MCS Hamburg

Another though on the badness of QIC-40 drives:

I have this Irwin streamer in my box, and from all of the
docs I read so far, it would also run on a 8088 based PC.
Now, with myself having an 486, a dos-emulator and linux,
I might get the idea of running the original software with
the emulator. Of course, it crashed, due to limited IO
privileges (I think).

BUT:
Giving the process these priviliges (sp?), and feeding a
tar of everything we want to backup through a FIFO (or
is it a named pipe?), which looks like some normal file 
to the emulator, should write the tar archive to tape
without too many problems. Of course, there would be at 
least two processes running (DOS and tar), but this shouldn't
kill it.... The machine is fast.

Does anybody know why this would not work? If not, does anybody
have documentation for the iopl() system call, or even better,
about all this vm86 stuff, so I can try and program the thing?

Thanks,
     Bernie

umisef@mcshh.hanse.de
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: Suggestions for the free Unix projects
From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 21:40:57 GMT
Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)

In article <id.GAUT.XH6@ferranti.com> peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva) writes:
>Let's look at the minimum for a releasable version on 386BSD:
>
>In article <1992Oct3.221703.1496@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@icarus.weber.edu writes:
>> o	The absolute minimum 150 page ring-bound manual and 3 disks costs
>> 	~$20 including shrink-wrap labor.  This is quantity 1000.
>
>Leave the printed manual out. Sell it separately as a $50 book set in the
>bookstores.
>
>> o	Packing and shipping costs are a minimum of $16, assuming UPS
>> 	ground.
>
>Make this a line item, to encourage quantity purchases.
>
>> o	A "media charge" for tape distribution of $18 is not unreasonable,
>> 	assuming QIC tape and bulk purchase, given production time.  Add
>> 	to this additional costs for amortization of alternate tape
>> 	systems if they are going to be used.
>
>For QIC I'd say that was low.
>
>> o	A "media charge" of $30 is not unreasonable if CD-ROM's are used,
>
>Well, there are a number of people selling CD-ROM sets of free software
>for $25-$40, so this is in line.
>
>> o	A "media charge" of $80 for a *full* high-density floppy distribution
>> 	(unless you own disk duplication equipment) using generic high
>> 	density disks would be getting off light.
>
>Agreed.
>
>> How does $1000 sound?  Like BSDI?
>
>Yep. For a source distribution. How about for a binary distribution? I know,
>it's not popular, but it's inevitable.
>
>> Say, I sound like "Bruce" on "Talk Net", don't I?  8-) 8-).
>
>Usenet is like Talknet where you can call Bruce up when he says something
>dumb (which does happen occasionally).


At one time, it was rumored that BSDI was going to provide a binary only
release of BSD386 for $295.  Have they ever said anything about this?

-- 

Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.UUCP	unixland!rmkhome!rmk	rmk@frog.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: "Stefan Berg" <sgberg@peach.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: UltraStore 24F (SCSI/EISA) support in Linux?
Organization: Computer Science, Indiana University
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 16:44:50 -0500

I already asked this question a few months ago and got many
replies back then. I ended up not being able to use Linux on
my machine, because I had trouble converting my Ultrastore
24F controller to ISA mode. I read in the post about the most
recent Linux version, that some support for an Ultrastore
controller was added.

Can somebody give me a definite answer, that the Ultra 24F
(it`s a real 32bit EISA controller... SCSI of course) will or
will not work on my 486/33 Gateway 2000 computer? Otherwise
my systems looks like: 8MB RAM, 300MB Maxtor, ATi Ultra,
Tape Drive, running OS/2 and MSDOS5 right now and want to
run Linux in parallel to the other OS`s.

Thanks,

Stefan

-- 
,--------------------------------------------------------------------,
| Usenet   sgberg@charon.bloomington.in.us            Stefan G. Berg |
| Internet sgberg@ucs.indiana.edu        GE Mail: s.berg5            |
| Bitnet   sgberg@iubacs  NeXT Mail: sgberg@arapahoe.ucs.indiana.edu |
`--------------------------------------------------------------------'
From: geek+@CMU.EDU (Brian E. Gallew)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: SIG[SEG,BUS]
Date: 30 Sep 92 07:54:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.cemQqPy00WAJRfXTVx
Organization: Administrative Systems, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Are there any plans for supporting SIGSEG and SIGBUS?  HLU?

                                  -Brian

You drop the bomb -more-
It goes off... -more-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  My cluelessness is more real than apparent...                        |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  DEC measures their benchmarks with a calendar!!                      |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: kennu@mits.mdata.fi (Kenneth Falck)
Subject: Programming special hardware stuff with GCC
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 21:28:34 GMT

I've been wondering for some time now about some of the GCC's
include files like sys/kd.h and sys/serial.h; they seem to
be full of #define's that sound interesting, but with which
functions do you use those #defined codes?

It seems that these include files are closely related to
hardware stuff like serial ports and the keyboard, but
there are only some structure definitions in addition to
the #defines.

So, can I do anything cool with these or are they there
just to support some future stuff?.... I'm not planning
any special project, just started wondering about them.

(Btw, I applied the recently posted busmouse patch to
my kernel, and now it says it doesn't detect a Microsoft
bus mouse, which is exactly what it's supposed to say.. 
So at least it works that way around, my thanks to the 
author :-)

-- 
kennu@mits.mdata.fi
From: tdunbar@vttcf.cc.vt.edu (Thomas Dunbar)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: xfopen code in xdvi's util.c
Date: 29 Sep 92 16:36:44 GMT
Article-I.D.: athena.1992Sep29.163644.17506
Reply-To: tdunbar@vttcf.cc.vt.edu
Organization: The Internet

| 
| In article <7474@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> you write:
| 
| > when i run xdvi on a dvi file with more than 26 fonts, it tries to
| >make the fonts even tho they exist and then it dies. is this a problem
| >with xfopen/fopen functions?
| > i'm running xdvi on XFree86-v 1.0Ya, compiled with gcc 2.2.2d7 on Linux.
| 
| What does fopen() do when you try to open more than that many files?  It
| is supposed to return NULL and set errno equal to ENFILE or EMFILE.
| Try writing a small program to see what is different here.
| 
| --Paul Vojta, vojta@math.berkeley.edu
| 

 Mr Vojta,
   it does return NULL and set errno to "too many files open" if i put
     printf("f is %d\n",d);
     perror("errno is ");
   before the if; however it doesn't do the if. 
     i'm not a C programmer (hardly a programmer at all!)..i just
     deleted the and condition and it worked fine. i'm posting to the 
 comp.os.linux so those who know what they're doing can find and really
fix what's causing the problem (we [linux os] use: gcc 2.2.2 & XFree86 1Y)
   i wouldn't have uploaded my "patched" file but a while back people
were complaining about xdvi/MakeTeXPK and i, not normally using many
fonts, didnt know what the problem was. i think it was never resolved.
  the errno.h file has:
#define EMFILE  24   /* Too many files open */
  but printf("errno is %d", errno) gives
     errno is 0f
  
  i'd have thought the above was just my ignorance/installation (of gcc)
errors but for others having the same problems and my not having any trouble
with it and others i've compiled.
   
   thomas
 
ps for others: talking about code in the xfopen function in util.c from
the xdvi source.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: tree@midget.towson.edu (Denise Tree)
Subject: Gnuplot problems..
Reply-To: tree@midget.towson.edu (Denise Tree)
Organization: The Internet
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 02:44:11 GMT


Hi Activists,

I planned on doing math class work this semester with Calc
and Gnuplot.... I can't compile Gnuplot though.

It seems to be a headers problem, the compile is fine 'till
it gets to LInux specific stuff with vgalib. Then I get many
"<blah,blah> previously defined" errors.

I have gcc2.2.2 with 0.97pl2ish kernel and the gnuplot src 
from tsx-11. Ps and several kernal compiles have given no
problems... I have a symlink from /usr/src/linux/include/
linux/ to /usr/include/linux/.

Do I need to remove all the -nostdinc from linux src Makefiles?


On a related note: I remember a mention of a math program called
Gap... would this be helpful for graphing and calculus?

Is there an X11 math package that could be used instead 
under Linux... I 86'ed dos almost entirely but would like some 
of the funtionality of Derive or Microcalc...

Any other suggestions?
______________________________________________________________________
_______________ Denise Tree
____________________________tree@midget.towson.edu
_________________________________________.... . . .   .   .    .     .
                                                                     .
                                                                     .
                                                                     *
From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Trouble with 0.98 + tcp
Date: 30 Sep 1992 23:18:18 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

negaard@aero.org (Eric Negaard) writes:

>I tried to compile Linux 0.98 with the tcp code last night, and
>the kernel doesn't boot.  I get the following message:

>    Memory: 7396k/8192k available (376k kernel, 384k reserved, 36k data)
>    stack segment: 0000
>    EIP:	0008:00016C36

>	33 Mhz 80486, 8Mb
>	Kernel config options:
>		No SCSI
>		No profiling
>		No math emulation
>		Compiled with -m486

>Does this give anyone any clues as to what's going wrong?

>			Eric Negaard

This is strange, as my setup is the exact same as yours as far as equipment
goes. I am currently running 97.6 with the scsi in just for fun. I have
the tcpip code in for the loopback also, and am having no problem compiling
or booting. Could you email me your main Makefile as well as the kernal
blk-drv one, and also the net Makefile. I have a feeling something isn't
being setup correctly in them.

James
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: ATI ULTRA
From: <GXS109@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 20:55:59 EDT
Organization: Penn State University

 Hello, I am think about purchasing a new computer. I would like to know
if linux/X has support for an ATI ULTRA graphics accelerator card.
Thank you in advance for your help
                  Greg
Gregory Sysak
gxs109@psuvm.psu.edu
sysak@wilbur.psu.edu
sysak@haydn.psu.edu