HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lorico@boomboom.Eng.Sun.COM (Lori Cotton)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: triangles in bed (was Re: My first Triangle0
Date: 7 Oct 92 18:14:07 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: boomboom

In article <MUFFY.92Oct7110237@remarque.berkeley.edu> muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) writes:
>
>I'm not saying you or anyone else should do this, but just because it
>doesn't work for you doesn't mean it doesn't work at all.
>

Right, that's exactly what I was saying!  Some people are extremely pleased
with this arrangement.  I guess maybe I haven't had the right partners
Any takers?  *blatant flirt*
>  I must say, though, that we rarely end up in triangular formation...
>maybe we should try it...*grin*...

Interesting formation.  It's was probably my favorite position *wink*

 

--
lori.cotton@west.Sun.COM	|   "If I can't be trusted with a choice, then
SunSoft, Inc.			|    how can I be trusted with a child."
Los Angeles, CA			|	Source -- Bumper Sticker
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd)
Subject: Re: for play
Organization: DSO, Stanford University
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 01:22:06 GMT

muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) writes:
: iw@tosser.Rational.COM (The_Devine_Dolly) writes:
:
: >BTW whats your favourite to masturbated to music.
: 
: Anything on "Stealing Fire" by Bruce Cockburn.  That's my favorite music
: for *any* sex...

Yeesh!  It's certainly a beuatiful record, but I'm not sure *I* could
manage sex, solo or otherwise, to Peggy's Kitchen Wall, a song about
domestic violence, police insenitivity and social inertia ...
I don't imagine Iseult's suggestion of some The The to be any more my
cup of tea, although I don't have Mind Bomb so can't judge.
Call me hypersenitive, or perhaps I just listen too closely, but I'm not
sure I can masturbate with music on ... [Hmm; Mike adds another thing to
his "give it a try" list]

Mike, still whingeing at being separated from most of his CDs.
Christian detachment from posessions be damned - I *miss*my*music*!
-- 
Mike Lloyd, B0/1 h- f- t w- c g+ k+ s m- e? |"Bloody nose and burning eyes
      Retro-hippy, music nut, bi and        | Raised in laughter to the skies"
          backrubber of devotion            |     - Bruce Cockburn
 ....."I suffer from internalized homophonophobia"....."Their, they're".....
From: fwi@cco.caltech.edu (Bill Irion)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: L.A. bifolk get-together
Date: 16 Oct 1992 07:16:58 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: ca
NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu


Hi everybody,

Sharon Snyder and I are trying to organize a get-together for some of the
Los Angeles area bifolk on soc.bi and bisexu-l.  We're planning a dinner
at a Pasadena restaurant the night of Friday, November 6.  If you think
you can make it, please drop me some e-mail and I'll be happy to send you
the details.

*hugs* to all,

Bill

--
Bill Irion    fwi@cco.caltech.edu
"Good manners and bad breath will get you nowhere" - Elvis Costello

Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale)
Subject: Re: Teensy Weensy Virginities
Organization: DSG, Dept. of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:13:56 GMT

In <1992Oct15.121237.7019@micor.ocunix.on.ca> grinch@micor.ocunix.on.ca
(Dave Ferguson) writes:
>Of course, it's still kind of difficult for a man to be anal passive with a
>female partner, so I guess I *was* distinguishing for that one...

Huh? Have you never heard of strap-on dildos?


Ciaran.
-- 
---- Ciaran McHale (cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie)
\bi/ Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
 \/  Telephone: +353-1-7021539 FAX: +353-1-6772204
From: orc@amber.uucp (David Parsons)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Two women please
Date: 16 Oct 92 17:59:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: midway.1992Oct16.175956.17861
Organization: Department of Catastrophes

In article <1992Oct16.044900.6025@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> pclary@mushroom.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
|orc@amber.uchicago.edu wrote...
|>In article <1992Oct15.031820.11587@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> pclary@mushroom.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
|>|>In article <1992Oct14.124615.203108@uctvax.uct.ac.za> krgjus01@uctvax.uct.ac.za writes:
|>|>+I have always fantasised about having sex with two lesbians at once as I
|>|>+think it must be the most amazing experience imaginable. 
|>|Sure if you like being ignored...  Utterly and completely ignored...
|>   It does make it easier to take pictures, though...
|*laugh*  If he was with two lesbians that's about all he'd get to do.

   Well, he could:
      o  Act as an adjustable anchor for bondage games.
      o  Wave a palm fan, for that egyptian atmosphere.
      o  Fetch lube, refreshments, and toys when needed.
      o  Change bedding if it became too, umm, used.
      o  Provide free advice.
      o  Wish he was a lesbian.

   Lotsa things ;-)

                 ____
  david parsons  \??/  "Did I miss anything?"
                  \/
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Swamp Thing)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Edinburgh Muffin Pops up in Bay Area
Date: 13 Oct 92 15:35:46 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

Good grief, Alan's de-muffined; suddenly my worldview is radically
altered ... >{8-)  I expect you to keep posting now Alan, once you've
recovered from the wonders of the Bay ...

Sara
-- 
 >{8-)     Sara Hopkins     (-8}<              _____^__
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St. \ OOO/ / The Thing
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662 \++/ /   From
 >{8-) sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk (-8}<   ** nice **   \/\/ The Swamp
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: tmo@harry.engin.umich.edu (Tanya M Ollick)
Subject: Re: Ponderings..
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 09:55:07 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan (CAEN)
Keywords: folks at soc.bi
Originator: tmo@harry.engin.umich.edu


In article <dsuchy19.719114072@ursa>, dsuchy19@ursa.calvin.edu (Dawn Suchy) writes:
> 
> And..... I was wondering... is there *anybody* out there reading
> this in Michigan??  [eep! -- but *not* at *my* school, I hope!] 
> (not yet quite ready to jump out of the closet.... 8-)
> 
> 

Yep ... from Ann Arbor, courtesy of the Big Blue U. The place the whole state frolics to on football Saturdays. Think of it ... 106,000+ people ... 30,000+ extra cars ... all trying to park on my lawn (I live two blocks from Michigan Stadium). But you really don't have to go public if you don't want to - demuffining on the net was not hard for me (don't believe her! she's lying!), but face-to-face with people might be harder (is there a food term for that, too? :)

TMO
From: pclary@mushroom.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Two women please
Date: 16 Oct 92 04:49:00 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA - aka Barnum & Bailey

orc@amber.uchicago.edu wrote...
>In article <1992Oct15.031820.11587@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> pclary@mushroom.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
>|>In article <1992Oct14.124615.203108@uctvax.uct.ac.za> krgjus01@uctvax.uct.ac.za writes:
>|
>|<mischievous grin>
>|(Dare I?  Dare I? I simply cannot resist...)
>
>  Some articles are just too tempting not to follow up to.
>
>|>+I have always fantasised about having sex with two lesbians at once as I
>|>+think it must be the most amazing experience imaginable. 
>|
>|Sure if you like being ignored...  Utterly and completely ignored...
>
>   It does make it easier to take pictures, though...

*laugh*  If he was with two lesbians that's about all he'd get to do.

Ellen
From: rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: National Coming Out Day
Date: 12 Oct 92 05:09:22 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Oct12.024253.29194@cs.cornell.edu> borah@cs.cornell.edu (Vicki Borah) writes:
->I don't usually post, but it is, of course, a good day for
->demuffining, so here I am. Happy National Coming Out Day from yet
->another bisexual queer cuddly person.
->(Fenthe/Daniel, do I get a hug now?)

*pout* What about me, Vicki?

*snuggle* *hug* *lick* *slurp* *cuddle*

Hi Vicki!!! Nice to see you here at last!

<to be continued elsewhere on the net>


-- 
Roy S. Rapoport        rsr@soda.berkeley.edu        bi-request@ocf.berkeley.edu
          Aren't you glad you're bi? Don't you wish everyone else was?
DISCLAIMER:  "I meant every word of it ... but nobody else did."
From: zen@death.corp.sun.com (d)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: explanation needed
Date: 8 Oct 92 09:44:25 GMT
	<1992Oct8.060816.13492@scammell.ecos.tne.oz.au>
Organization: savage hackers
NNTP-Posting-Host: death.corp.sun.com
In-reply-to: rl@scammell.ecos.tne.oz.au's message of Thu, 8 Oct 1992 06:08:16 GMT


In article <1992Oct8.060816.13492@scammell.ecos.tne.oz.au> rl@scammell.ecos.tne.oz.au (Raymond Lee) writes:
>   Can somebody lighten me up what these symbols mean? I had
>   puzzled for a loooonnnng time!!
>   :  B0/1 h- f- t w- c g+ k+ s m- e? 

  It's obvious that you need my perl bear decoder ring, er, program.
Feeding this through it reads:

Little or no beard to VERY slight beard
no beard or mustache
below average fur
fairly tall
thin
cub tendencies
likes to be touched most of the time
willing to consider new ideas
nuetral about relationships/monogomy
not very muscular
noteworthily endowed (no hard visual info available)

  Which translates fairly well into a particular edinburgh gentleman, I
believe.

 -- d
From: zen@death.corp.sun.com (d)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: My first Triangle
Date: 6 Oct 92 23:32:59
Organization: savage hackers
NNTP-Posting-Host: death.corp.sun.com
In-reply-to: mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU's message of 6 Oct 92 17:40:26 GMT


In article <1992Oct6.174026.4597@leland.Stanford.EDU> mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd) writes:
> The person behind the counter said she'd
> seen some of the rings before, but wanted to know what they meant,
> as she thought they were very pretty.  I considered what to say...
> [...]
> What *should* I have said?

  I think that there's a significant difference between what they might
"officially" or commonly mean, and what they mean to you.  I'm not
exactly sure what they're supposed to mean -- I've asked several stores
that sell the things, and no one has been able to tell me; something
about lesbigayness or something.  Personally, I certainly don't assume
bthat anyone wearing them is queer/gay/bi/lesbian/ whatever; I usually
connect it with someone who is sympathetic or supportive to the same, or
alternate lifestyles in general.  When I used to wear (in my
pre-bi-aware days) my black t-shirt with a big pink triangle and the ol'
"silence == death" logo, it was a challenge to people -- an attempt to
shake their perceptions of who people were underneath the common
sociological veneer.  Now that my personal sexual perception has
changed, the reasons for wearing it and my buttons and pins are the
same.  To make people think -- to raise conciousness.

  But back to your questions... what *should* you have said?  You could
try:

    If you meet a queer on the road, kill them.

  But I don't think they'd understand.  Maybe just say that it means
that you're romantically and sexually attracted to those of the opposite
sex.  But I think you're up to your professorial tricks, and are trying
to trick us -- there isn't a right answer, is there?  Or is it "E" --
all of the above?

> My colourblindness
> means I can't tell which one is gone]

  Are you really colorblind?

> Mike Lloyd, B0/1 h- f- t w- c g+ k+ s m- e?

  Anyone else notice this has been changing?

 -- d
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: rl@scammell.ecos.tne.oz.au (Raymond Lee)
Subject: explanation needed
Organization: a company
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 06:08:16 GMT

Can somebody lighten me up what these symbols mean? I had
puzzled for a loooonnnng time!!

:  B0/1 h- f- t w- c g+ k+ s m- e? 

ray
From: rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert Charles Lebeau)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: two men (was: two women)
Date: 16 Oct 1992 06:26:48 GMT
Organization: Eventually I will forget once and then can stop changing this
		everytime.
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu


In article <MUFFY.92Oct14160744@remarque.berkeley.edu> muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) writes:
>
>In article <1bhebuINNjg@agate.berkeley.edu> rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport) writes:
>>she went "Oh .. *blush* You know, I've always had this fantasy of two men in
>>bed with me ... " *laugh*.  Why is it that I found _that_ much less
>>reprehensible than if the genders were reversed?
>
>
>Well, that may be the way your friend feels, but if *I* was in bed with
>two men (which is a fantasy of mine...actually, most of my fantasies
>involve *more* than two other people...*GRIN*), I would definitely
>expect *them* to be pleasing *me*.  Otherwise, why bother?
>

	Hmmm....my most current fantasy would be to be with
2 women and another man, all bisexual, at once.  All the different
possiblities intrigue me.  But unfortunately I'm not outgoing enough
to probably ever meet that many people and feel comfortable enough
to do it, but then again that's what fantasy is for.
	As for a threesome I would probably be more comfortable with
2 men - 1 woman.  But of course once again we are talking fantasy
land.  I think it might be (the reason I'd prefer 2 male, as compared
to 2 females) that I would feel some sort of pressure as being the
only male.  

			Robert (still contemplating my fantasies)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert LeBeau--> rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu  (One day I'll fix this)
"witty quote goes here" -- some famous or obscure source
This space reserved for drawing using keyboard symbols
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: nsn@ee.mu.OZ.AU (Nick Nicholas)
Subject: Re: for play
Organization: Electronic and Electrical Engineering - University of Melbourne 
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 04:58:24 GMT

tweaver@nyx.cs.du.edu (T.C.Weaver) writes:
>> mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd) writes:
>Yeah, right. You're willing to sleep with someone, but not to talk. I can
>*almost* see this by changing into SuperQueer, diving out of the closet with
>my underpants over my trousers and declaiming that all those folks out there
>succumbing to their terrible urges have lots of hormones and no brains.

Ah. Well you see, Tanaqui, were you to do that, I fear I would have to run
you down in the middle of the road...


                                  "If I meet a queer on the road..."
                 (O                          Q  /
SUPERQUEER  --> //H--'                   /O--Y  <-- Nick the Mundane
               // V            BIKE --> C=co=U= o  o  o
__________________LL_____________________0__<_0___________________

Since I rejected Albert Lunde's slogan, I would abstain from the pleasure
of 'fucking' you first :)

And I promise not to call you Buddha while doing the deed :)

>>A phonecall or somesuch can wreck a mood, 
><trrring trrring> "Hiya, whatcha doing?" "Oh, nothing..."

Joe, I'm not going to say a word here! Do you hear me?! Not a *word*!

... well, three words actually. "On the PHONE?!" %^)

Wishing that *just once* an urge would present him/self and allow me to
succumb all over them, I remain

Yours in polysigitude and idjit ASCII art,

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Nick S. Nicholas,                      "Rode like foam on the river of pity
Depts. of CompSci & ElecEng,            Turned its tide to strength
University of Melbourne, Australia.     Healed the hole that ripped in living"
nsn@{munagin.ee|mundil.cs}.mu.oz.au           - Suzanne Vega, Book Of Dreams
______________________________________________________________________________
From: rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert Charles Lebeau)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Lincoln Uni. has SOC.BI
Date: 16 Oct 1992 06:53:54 GMT
Organization: This will be the last time I change this.
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu


In article <1bjaoeINNbgj@agate.berkeley.edu> rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport) writes:
>->: Well, if you do, then I insist on the right to worship you as a god.
>
>->Permission steadfastly refused :-)  

	Damn!  I thought I found a new god. Now my search must continue.

>
>*pout* Awww ... OK ... how about if I just worship you as an awesome person?
>Would that be OK? Huh, huh, huh?

	Hmm...souldn't we worship everyone on soc.bi as an awesome
person?  With the exception for people who post stupid things the
purple helmeted warrior.

>
>Ooh, yumm ... 
>*very thoroughly applies a hug or three to Mike, enjoying himself
>tremendously*
>
>*applies hugs to everyone who wants them*

	I'll take one of those thank you.
*gets hugged by Roy*

*gives hugs to anyone who wants want also*

--Robert

Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: noid@nick.csh.rit.edu (ky the art fag!!)
Subject: Re: being "in love"
Organization: Computer Science House @ RIT
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 17:21:16 GMT

In article <#44-rw#@engin.umich.edu> tmo@harry.engin.umich.edu (Tanya M Ollick) writes:
>
>
>
>
>
>xuals (he was apparently scared  by an amorous male hairdresser). He is nervous and moody to the point of violence. I  want to be open with him, but past experience suggests that he will view it as a betrayal and really go over the edge. Since my brother still lives with him, I would be setting both him and me up for an incredibly violent set of outbursts, and of course I would never be welcome again. Right now, I simply can't face that.
>  The only obligation or moral duty you have is to yourself. Tell others if you feel comfortable telling them, but don't worry if you can't right now. It will come in time, I hope.
>
>TMO


this post has 2 , count them *2*, purposes (sp?).
	first.... am i getting through?

that said on we go....
i have somewhat the same problem as above, only my dad doesn't have any 
	obvious aversion against homosexuality of any kind (operative
	word being obvious).  if i were to come out to him as being 
	lesbian he could probably handle it.  BIG problem comes into play
	when i mention that i am not yet physically female.  if i was simply
	gay i could continue with my life without telling him, but i think the
	change in gender would probably catch his attention at the first
	following thanksgiving.  me and dad aren't exactly best buddies but
	we're close enough that i can't, and wouldn't want to, avoid him for
	the rest of my life.
i have however come out to my mother.  but she is in deep denial and has yet
	to approach me about it.  i was given some advice some time ago to
	just leave her alone to "digest" the info and she would come to me
	for more info.  it has now been over a year.  i know this is bad, but
	the more time that passed the harder it got to approach her again.
	it feels like i have to tell her all over again for the "first" time
	(hope that's clear) and i think all of my courage was drained from me
	the first time around.
i have plans to tell the rest of the family eventually, (see thanksgiving
	example (-8  ) but if i can just get through the two parents ( well
	three) then they can probably help me tell the others.  

	ANY advice on ANY of this mess is not only appreciated but is being
		despirately asked for.


-simply noid
From: cliveg@cix.compulink.co.uk (Clive Grace)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Kilroy
Date: 13 Oct 92 20:47:00 GMT
Reply-To: cliveg@cix.compulink.co.uk



I guess someone will have beaten me to it. But there we all wuz  on the 
Kilroy show... (a talk show that goes out (roughly) live on BBC TV at 
9:05am). Bill, Dave, Bethan and I, and lots and lots of other people 
outside of the EBG were there... it was a good show I think -- we got 
*our* way this time.

I'm waaay too tired to write anything coherent at the moment. But suffice 
to say, I'll write something later.

But a few teasers to get everyone going...

* Kate Fearnley's Mum should be given a show of her own - she's a 
  remarkable woman and so sweet with it. I wish I had a mum like that.
  Can she be loaned out for special occasions?

* Dave Berry and Bill look FAB on TV. Bill was certainy restrained though
  and did I trace a scent of Dr Flugelhorn's aftershave in the air?

* Dave Berry's tee shirt was visible to all...

* It was most certainly a case of dredge up all the old Bisexual myths 
  they could find And watch them get trashed by various people... nice 
  one whoever it was that first said the word "fuck" on pre-watershed TV!

The secret is out...

* Bethan and I are now officially "partners" to the x million people and 
  their dog watching... I only *thought* about punching him when he said...
  "What's wrong with Clive then?" Grrrrrrr :-) No chance to tell the rest
  of the world about my "other" partner with it.... but I restarined myself
  I didn't want them to latch onto me as a closet het male with a bisexual
  chick fixation. That's the way Kilroy would have worked I think.

* Yes, Bethan and I did indulge in an on-screen hug right at the end and I
  checked one of my two video copies -- and I can see it quite clearly.

* BBC Coffee is crap, it was either decaf or boiled, not something to 
  greet you at 7:30 when you got up at 5:00 after flying back from 
  Edinbugh.

More later. But I have a few phone calls to make, I think one to my 
Brother and my maternal nan, to my mum who basically finally admitted she 
can't accept my bisexuality (thanks mum, you saying you'd rather have me 
straight and happy than Bi and Happy gave me the impetus to go on... 
there are six messages on the answerphone, and I think I knoow who they're 
from.


But for now.... I MUST SLEEP!!!!!!

Clive

+----------------------------------------------+----------------------+
| "When I grow up, I want to give up being a   |cliveg@compulink.co.uk|
| Journalist and learn how to write..."        |cliveg@compulink.uucp |
+----------------------------------------------+----------------------+
From: fenthe@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: I'm back, I'm back, I'm back!
Date: 15 Oct 92 07:17:22 GMT
Article-I.D.: drycas.1992Oct15.121723.2264
Organization: Carnegie Mellon Computer Club

In article <Bw23nG.J6E@dcs.ed.ac.uk>, pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley) writes:
> After a year's absence, I announce my return to the virtual world.

 Well, I guess if it's a return then that's not really a demuffining; still,
sounds like a good excuse (as if excuses are needed..) for some 

 **hugs,snuggles'n'such**

-- 
Daniel Mitchell = Fenthe Marten = fenthe@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu =
m91djm@ecs.ox.ac.uk = dmitchell@cix.compulink.co.uk = bi furry juggler
Snailmail: 18, High St // Earls Colne // Essex CO6 2PA // ENGLAND
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: Change is GOOD!!!
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center and Reptile Farm
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 18:08:57 GMT

In article <1992Oct10.151207.25661@dsg.cs.tcd.ie> cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:
>In <92283.172624PJS137@psuvm.psu.edu> PJS137@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>>Who's says that three is a crowd?  However it was probably never had the
>>opportunity to really enjoy the experience.  I feel that three way interaction
>>is the ONLY way to go.  What do you think???????
>
>Any biblical number is likely to produce good results. Having already
>tried 3, you should also consider 7 and 40.

Biblical number?  I thought the important part was that it was prime.  This
rules 40 out, but 41 and 37 are okay.
--scott
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: jcarroll@bach.udel.edu (Royal J Carroll)
Subject: Re: National Coming Out Day
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 17:44:32 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.024253.29194@cs.cornell.edu> borah@cs.cornell.edu (Vicki Borah) writes:
>I don't usually post, but it is, of course, a good day for
>demuffining, so here I am. Happy National Coming Out Day from yet
>another bisexual queer cuddly person.
>(Fenthe/Daniel, do I get a hug now?)
>--Vicki

You can get lots of hugs (from man people!)

*SPROING* *POUNCE* *HUG*

-James

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Don't damn me when I speak a piece of my mind,
'Cause silence isn't golden when I'm holding it inside.
-Axl Rose, "Don't Damn Me"-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=jcarroll@brahms.udel.edu-