From: xiong@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Bo Xiong)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: What do I think about the "Protection Bill" ?
Date: 12 Oct 92 02:21:14 GMT
Organization: Indiana University

In article <BvzEpo.8rw@nic.umass.edu> usys@titan.ucc.umass.edu 
(CLARENCE J MAZIARZ JR) writes:
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>xiong@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Bo Xiong) writes:
> ...
>>Disclaimer:  None of Bush's April 11, 1990 Executive Order or the Protection 
>>             Act of 1992 would/will benefit me becasue they were/are too late,
>>             and I am not a political asylee ... :-)
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Bo Xiong in Chicago
>
>This guy, Bo Xiong, is undoubtfully the most shameless one among the notorious
>beggar group.   You are really disguting.

That guy, "CLARENCE J MAZIARZ JR", (in anyway related to Clarence Thomas? :-)
must be "EYELESS"  (this is a Chinese word, guess it is it's applicable to 
a pretending-to-be-evil, a.k.a. Jia3 Yang2 Gui3 Zi0 :-)  If you do have an 
eye, then open it, even if just for venting your excessive stinks :-)

Let me elaborate you what my above statement means by borrowing
Shannon Yeh's Chinese writting :-)

+In article <2AD2455A.27169@news.service.uci.edu> 
+yeh@netix.com (Mr Shannon Yeh) wrote:
+>
+> / /___   __|__   /\/\  -- \   -----  \  ||_
+>/|   |/     /\     /\  -|-|-   |-||   \ ---/
+> |  /|\    /  \   /--\ /| |/   |_||      \/
+> |  \|    /    \   ||  \| /\|    \|  \/  /\
+>                                               
+>
+> -----    |=|  |    /     /  |=|   __|_ _\_
+>|=|=|=|  --|- ||   /\    /| __|__    |/ |_|
+> --/-/-   / | ||  /  \    |  /|\    /|  |
+>   \/    /  | || /    \   | / | \    |  |
+>   /\      \| \|          |   |     \| /    .


So, "CLARENCE J MAZIARZ JR", got it?  The difference between my stand and
that of Shannon Yeh is BIG though:  

I don't mind those FREE RIDERS of IFCSS Immigration Bus, though the bus
is too little too late for many people like myself - without the bus and
Bush's executive order in 1990, we would have obatined what we already HAD 
via normal procedure (and moral even per your definition :-) EASIER and 
EARLIER, but we simply did/don't mind even if the normal channel got very
crowded due to Bush's executive order.

My suggestion to you is the same:   The Immigration Bus ridership is totally,
completely, thoroughly and absolutely ANONYMOUS, you may take the free ride 
as your fellow bashers of the protection act while you enjoy bashing on the 
drivers/pilots of the Immigration Bus (that's too immoral but who can
stop you ?? :-)

>xiong@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Bo Xiong) writes:
> 
>>What do I think about the Protection Act?  (not a bill anymore :-)
>>
>>In article <Bvy1w2.4xC@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> 
>>Lian Zheng <LZHENG@ucs.indiana.edu> writes:
>>> 
>>> ......
>>>The conclusion is easy to draw from the above.   The sounding slogans,
>>>such as human rights, democracy, and helping the development of China, 
>>>are just beatiful cheating.  Among the people I have met, including non-CSS, 
>>>NOBODY buys the pretext.
>>
>>Well, as a Gao Gan of Indiana Univ. Lian-Yi-Hui that never deals with IFCSS
>>(there is a CSSA supporting IFCSS in IU), you wouldn't go against the Act
>>since so many of your LYH members will be benefited from the Act, right?
>>
>>Then why bother to throw those crap on the network?  The Protection Act
>>is just like an Immigration Bus (or IFCSS Immigration Bus :-), and those
>>eligible ordinary CSS, no matter what they think about China, June 4th,
>>or related matter, they will just take the bus as FREE RIDERS, so what?
>>
>>MOST of the free riders/beneficiaries of the Act even did NOT participate 
>>the lobby activities and they DID NOT cheat anyone/lie to anyone, why can't
>>they take the FREE RIDE ?  (Just like their conterpart in Canada, who got
>>the free ride offered by Canadian gov't two years ago without lobby!)
>>
>>If you want to fire at someone, find out your correct target, such as the
>>IFCSS Immigration Bus drivers/pilots :-)  But who of those ordinary
>>riders care about what you said?   You too may take the free ride
>>without lying to/cheating anyone, and you may even take the bus while
>>condemning the drivers, and your free ride on the IFCSS immigration bus
>>is also COMPLETELY annonymous, i.e., no one would know whether you have
>>taken it or not (thanks to the system of U.S.A. :-), just like most of
>>the SCC bashers of protection act have been doing :-)
>>
>>Disclaimer:  None of Bush's April 11, 1990 Executive Order or the Protection 
>>             Act of 1992 would/will benefit me becasue they were/are too late,
>>             and I am not a political asylee ... :-)
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Bo Xiong in Chicago