HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pmmuggli@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu  (pauline muggli)
Subject: Re: AMC: long sieges without bathrooms
Originator: mdtll@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 17:20:35 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

  axpmw@acad2.alaska.edu pam writes:
>  pmmuggli@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu  (pauline muggli) writes:
>
>> i'm not expecting total reality, but the only times i've seen a
>Good Thing!          ^^^^^^^^^^^

:) :) :)
 
>> bathroom on the show is when someone is listening to a
>> conversation on the other side of the (stall) door or a
>> pregnancy test.  if they want the kidnapping scenarios to be
>> more believable, take the people to a place with a bathroom (house
>> boat).  after all, most of the lengthy kidnappings we've seen have
>> involved feeding the captive.
 
>They could at least have Erika ask to go... not actually have to
>show it... another chance for her to whine!
 
this is in line with what i would have liked.  i don't want
total reality, but i'd prefer in these long sieges if the people
were somewhat more human, not anotomically incorrect dolls, i.e.
no bladders, hair never messes up, etc.  i don't want this for
every day scenes, just long locked up someplace.

pauline "just b*tching" muggli
From: norbeck@pleiades.cs.bucknell.edu (She Who Must Be Obeyed)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: SB: Canine stuff
Date: 17 Nov 1992 01:31:23 GMT
Organization: Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: alphard.cs.bucknell.edu



Hi all...Just a quick question for you...


I mentioned in a post the other day that I'm writing a murder mystery, 
but I didn't mention thatn the heroine and her hubby have an Irish Setter.
Well, they do :) and when I introduced said canine I decided that the 
perfect name for him would be Connor, in honor of our favorite SB
dog-lover.

Well, I was feeling quite pleased with myself until I realised that this 
dog is owned by a man whose last name is O'Connor.  Now, this is pretty
obviously the problem.  It is compounded by the fact that both the dog and
the hubby have really cool names that I don't want to change (the hubby is
John Joseph O'Connor).  However, I don't really think I can justify 
having both of them have such similar names.  I thought of naming the 
dog Winston, but that felt too much like cheating to me.  And McCabe
just doesn't sound much like a dog's name (unless there's some story 
behind it).

Can anybody help me think of a solution to this problem?  If you can
think of a plausible way for me to keep both names the same, that
would be especially welcome.  I promise I'll give the SB crowd
(Or my canine naming savior(s)) special credit when I sell the
manuscript (hahaha...).  I know you guys are good with this stuff,
after all this group is forever coming up with better solutions to the
plot than the SB writers do, so put on your thinking caps and let's see
what we can come up with!

Thanks much in advance...


Nancy
--
|.."I've heard snappier comebacks from a bowl of Rice..|....Nancy Norbeck.....|
|......Krispies."  Charles Emerson Winchester III......|.norbeck@bucknell.edu.|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mcmahon@nd.edu (Sheila M. McMahon)
Subject: Re: ATWT: Trivia #6
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 19:25:58 GMT

In article <1e8o5pINNl1g@rave.larc.nasa.gov> mike@scbked.larc.nasa.gov (Michael S warner) writes:

>In article <16NOV199211145516@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov> afpaeji@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (JIM PAE) writes:
>>In article <mcmahon.159@nd.edu>, mcmahon@nd.edu (Sheila M. McMahon) writes...
>>>Here we go again folks...
>>
>>
>>
>>>9) What was Craig and Sierra's "song"?
>>
>>"Drop kick me Jesus through the goal posts of Life"

I'm sorry to say, TooTall, that your answer is incorrect. However, you do get
points for originality, and for making me crack up which caused all my co-
workers to give me funny looks.


>>>10) What is the name of Lyla's sister?

>Grasshopper!  Or was that her daughter...

Hee hee! I get it EtTu, you're talking about Cricket. But alas, she was 
Lyla's daughter, not her sister.

>>
>>>Enjoy,
>>>Irish
>>
>>Thanks Irish.  I look forward to seeing the actual answers from the more 
>>informed.
>>
>>tooTALL

>Well, I tried, but we still need help.  Where do you get these, oh Irish
>Goddess of Trivia?

Believe it or not, these are just things that I remember. Can you believe I
clutter my mind with such useless information????

>EtTuMike

Irish
From: mjmh@crsa.bu.edu (Michael J M Holmes)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: AMC:Palmer's Back in Action!!!
Date: 18 Nov 92 15:41:56 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Boston University Center for Remote Sensing

YES! YES! YES! I am *so* excited!  oops, maybe better warn for spoilers...










I hope this is enough!

Palmer back in action, ready to take on Adam!
Is this great, or what???

I must admit, the storyline I have gotten must excited about,
most involved in, in the past kazillion years on AMC, was the
last big Chandler-Cortlandt feud.  I thought it was GREAT!
All the maneuvering, Adam as evil and manipulative as ever,
Dixie in the middle, Tad, Will, Palmer scheming and plotting,
all culminating in the *wonderful* ball scene where Adam 
LOST IT ALL!!!  I watched those scenes a dozen times at least!

I would *love* to see a rematch!!  And it would be great to
see Adam lose it all again, but I'd be satisfied with just
knocking him down a few pegs.

I know Palmer cna be nasty and just as much of a
"family-control-freak" as Adam, but, to me, Palmer
has always been a much more sympathetic character, more
of a "good guy," - and it seems that Palmer has at least
occasionally learned to let his family do what they want.

(Just so you know whom I am rooting for!!)

Anyways, after some NOT so interesting storylines, I
see this as VERY promising - and maybe even a GREAT
way to buildup to the return of Tad.

I'm so excited!!!!

mike
:)

-- 
========================================================================
Mike Holmes       mjmh@crsa.bu.edu           "Happiness Will Prevail!"
Boston University Department of Geography (a truly GREAT place to work!)
========================================================================
From: gillon@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Y & R update
Date: 23 Nov 92 20:04:23 -0500
Distribution: world
Organization: Georgetown University

Well, for an update on Monday's show: victoria moved out of the ranch 
to a tearful goodbye from the parents. victor was actually being nice 
about it, although he still called Ryan the scum. it was basically 
just for the mush content. molly is coming back to town to convince 
lauren that sheila really isn't that bad.(not.) nina is totally being 
nosey with ryan's life. i really don't understand that boy. at first i 
thought he was only screwing around with victoria's head, but he's 
putting up with an awful lot. maybe he figures that if he ditched her 
now victor would kill him anyway for hurting his poor precious little 
girl. i have a big question though. what is the deal with paul's new 
daughter? where did she come from? is this a new development due to 
lack of exciting plot line with the discovery of ryan and victoria? 
obviously sometime soon his daughter is going to show up on his 
doorstep. and speaking of paul, did him and lauren totally end it? or 
does she still have totally no morals? this thing in the office with 
brad is out of control. if anyone has any input, i'd appreciate the 
answers.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: nan@ravel.udel.edu (Nanette Reisor)
Subject: Re: GH: Update Tuesday 11/17
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:33:10 GMT

In article <1eec3tINNpq8@transfer.stratus.com> amy@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Amy McNulty) writes:
=>In article <1992Nov18.123702.14305@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu>  
=>bggreenberg@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Brian Greenberg) writes:
=>> Here's Tuesday's Update:
=>> 
=>> Scene 1
=>> Felecia tells Sean that Ryan is the one who killed the people in  
=>Texas. 
=>
=>[remainder of summary deleted to save bandwidth]
=>
=>Ok, I haven't even been watching since the stabbing (just
=>faithfully reading the detailed updates!), but this whole
=>storyline with Felicia is really starting to bug me.
=>Didn't someone write that Ryan drove the Jeep through the
=>door of the cabin after Felicia locked him out? Wouldn't
=>there be a teensy-little bit of evidence that this happened,
=>enough to make people wonder why he would have done that
=>if he was innocent?  Sorry to rant & rave, but I get really
=>frustrated with this kind of back-and-forth-but-we-know-it's
=>all-going-to-turn-out-ok storyline!  :-]
=>

You are right, someone wrote that Ryan drove the Jeep through the door of
the cabin. The person who wrote that was wrong. Ryan broke down the door by
bodily crashing through it. Remember he threw the distributor cap away. To
get the Jeep started he'd have to dig through a snow bank to locate the cap
and then install it. I don't think there was enough time to do that.



-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                                                       Nanette Reisor
        |\| /-\ |\|                                       CNS/MIS
     nan@brahms.udel.edu                           University of Delaware
From: jreeves@emdeng.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Jacki.A.Reeves)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Character Bio's
Date: 17 Nov 92 13:00:06 GMT
Organization: NCR, E&M Dayton

In article <1992Nov12.165521.49329@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, es03@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ERIKA K. SELL) writes:
> 
>                      ALAN SPAULDING
> 
>              He has slept with Blake - before we knew who she was
>                                Reva - he loved when she wore hwer sexy dresses
>                                India - thay were great together
> 

I don't remember this India part.  What were the circumstances of their
"get-together"?  Plus, don't forget about Elizabeth, Jackie, Hope, Jennifer
Richards, ...  There were many women in his life.

--JR






Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: pmmuggli@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu  (pauline muggli)
Subject: Re: AMC: Edmund/Brooke
Originator: mdtll@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:33:34 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA


  sue@snafu.seada.com (Sue Raul) writes:

>I don't know, but am I the only one who just doesn't buy
>this turn-around of Edmund's?  He's never been a criminal
>before.  He's never wanted the Wildwind estate before (now
>he wants "half of everything").  He just doesn't convince me,
>(he's too cute :-)). No, really, whoever said the writers had
>to do something to free up Brooke for Tad I think hit the
>nail on the head. Why else would they write such unbelievable
>behavior into Edmund's character and have Brooke bringing up
>Jamie all the time?

i think this is more believable than the ever popular bad guy
turned good.  ok, maybe not more believable, but a nice change
of pace.

pauline "used to be just like my evil twin sister" muggli
From: pmmuggli@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (pauline muggli)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: PATRICIA!!!!!  (was bye bye beverly)
Date: 16 Nov 92 00:46:44 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
Originator: mdtll@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu


  pmmuggli@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu  (pauline muggli) writes:

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRGGGGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PAULINE MADE A BOO-BOO!!!!!!
this refers to patricia not beverly!!!!
 
>i never have figured out how to send e-mail to the UUCP
>addresses.  it bounces back rather quickly.  so, i thought i'd
>publicly say...
 
>beverly, i'm sorry you're leaving, and i hope your hubby finds
 ^^^^^^^
patricia!!!  

>work soon.  milwaukee is a lovely city. (if you decide to move
>there.)  i lived there two summers in the early 1980s.
 
>  appreciate the fact that you are telling us you are losing net
>access rather than just disappearing.  i have also noticed you
>have been posting a flurry of articles.  i suppose that means
>you'll miss us too.

my only excuse is that i read the goodbye and hit the space
instead of mark.  i knew it was a uucp address, 'cause i never
mail to those.  rather than going back and looking through
hundreds of articles, i thought it was beverly when i wrote the
note later that day.

i realized my mistake, when i saw beverly posting to tell
patricia good bye.....   :-(
 
i apologize!!! 
pauline "boy, my face is red" muggli
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: pml@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (patricia.m.lott)
Subject: Y&R
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:26:07 GMT
Keywords: Ryan & ??

In regard to the survey about Ryan and Victoria or
Ryan and Nina, I would prefer him with Nina.  However,
I do believe that Victoria truly believes he loves her,
and I'm beginning to believe it too.  My question now
is, where is Ryan going to get a job?  Hey!  I've got it!
He can go work for Lauren.  Or maybe Kate Stirling will
give him a job at Chancellor Industries.  Just one more
bad mark on her list when Victor finds out she gave
Victoria the bail money.  Now I wonder what Victor intends
to do about the illegal marriage.  How is he going to keep
Victoria away from Ryan?  And is Ryan insane?  Going to the
ranch after Victoria told him to stay away?!!!  I also wonder
why Nikki hasn't bothered to tell Victor that Ashley knew
about Victoria's involvement with Ryan from the start?
From: collene@unisql.UUCP (Collene Pearce)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL - continuity
Date: 19 Nov 92 16:34:04 GMT
Organization: UniSQL, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA

>Personally I cannot lay all the blame on the writers. I think that
>Corday and the asst. Producers, and other staff members are the
>main blame....

I was really trying to followup to this thread, but I noticed that
it had multiple subject lines -- DOOL Tuesday/DOOL Lately/etc.
So, I just made up my own.  :-)

Let me preface my question with this statement -- I am not trying to defend 
the writers.  As far as I am concerned, there is nothing that could excuse
what has been done to DAYS over the past 2 years.

However, as far as continuity is concerned -- isn't there a staff "history"
person for each soap whose job it is to be completely informed as to the 
show's history and isn't that person responsible for ensuring that the 
scripts are checked for continuity?  I remember hearing about this 
somewhere, but can't remember the person's proper title.

I'm probably showing my ignorance of the world of television here, but if
there is no such person or function, then there definitely _should_ be.


-- 

********************* #include <std_disclaimer.h> **********************
* A. Collene Pearce (512-343-7372, x114) * Organization: UniSQL, Inc.  *
*                                        * Austin, TX                  *
* unisql!collene@cs.utexas.edu           * 512-343-7297 or 7383(fax)   *
************************************************************************
From: amy@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Amy McNulty)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GH: Update Tuesday 11/17
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:21:01 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer Inc, Marlboro MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: blueheron.pubs.stratus.com

In article <1992Nov18.123702.14305@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu>  
bggreenberg@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Brian Greenberg) writes:
> Here's Tuesday's Update:
> 
> Scene 1
> Felecia tells Sean that Ryan is the one who killed the people in  
Texas. 

[remainder of summary deleted to save bandwidth]

Ok, I haven't even been watching since the stabbing (just
faithfully reading the detailed updates!), but this whole
storyline with Felicia is really starting to bug me.
Didn't someone write that Ryan drove the Jeep through the
door of the cabin after Felicia locked him out? Wouldn't
there be a teensy-little bit of evidence that this happened,
enough to make people wonder why he would have done that
if he was innocent?  Sorry to rant & rave, but I get really
frustrated with this kind of back-and-forth-but-we-know-it's
all-going-to-turn-out-ok storyline!  :-]

______________________________________________________________
amy_mcnulty@vos.stratus.com  or  amy@vineland.pubs.stratus.com
Amy McNulty -- Stratus Computer, Marlboro, MA
Stratus pays me to write, but not to write this!
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Monday, 23 Nov 1992 09:06:56 MST
From: <IDSWB@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject:    DOOL: sighting

Guess who I saw on USA's Young Riders.  Now before I tell you I know there
are those of you out there that don't like him but, I still remember how
good he used to be.  Wayne Northrup was a once bad guy turned good guy and
he had the cutest little boy.  Yes, he was killed in the end but, he really
did a good job playing his part.

Maybe if DOCL would give him a good storyline and some decent lines, there
wouldn't be so many people who feel the way they do about him.  It's really
sad that they asked him to come back and then left him in the dark without
anything to do or say.  Oh well, I guess that when it changed from DOOL to
DOCL they didn't have enough time to spend on anyone else.

A wishing TPTB could do things right Quince

 **************Don't start posting unless you have plenty of time************
 *                                                                          *
 * There are new territories to explore and *  IDSWB@ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU     *
 * conquer - so do it.        Spread your   *  Arizona State University     *
 * wings and go in search of new horizons.  *  Place usual disclaimer here  *
 *                      ASU Pegasus         *                               *
 *                                                                          *
 *   S   E       O       S   E       O       S    E      O       S   E      *
 *    M L      R  W       M L       R W       M L       R W       M L       *
 *     I      F    N       I       F   N       I       F   N       I        *
 *************************It's addicting*************************************
From: daveo@hpcvra.cv.hp.com (Dave Ochs)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:16:47 GMT
Subject: Re: AMC: Erica's in the Well
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, OR, USA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps

>/ hpcvra:rec.arts.tv.soaps / ""I can resist anything but temptation"" <tburgess@us.oracle.com> /  8:37 am  Nov 17, 1992 /
>
>Erica's in the well
....
>Okay it's a wine cellar...but goodness...I hope they 
>do not drag this out...what a stupid storyline....
...
>First Natalie in the well and Dimitri saved her...now Erica in the Cellar...
>what is this soap coming to....

Don't forget about Natalie being kidnapped by Carter ... the last year has
been a regular avalanche of [inane] abductions.

>Helga is too funny...I can't believe no one suspects her...after she pulled
>that stunt at Natalie's ball....She adds quite a bit to this soap.

Helga is the only thing that keeps my interest in this story.

>-tia "hoping they pop the cork on this storyline really soon" burgess

Dave Ochs            "Even if I did hit her it wouldn't have done any good
daveo@cv.hp.com      ... [sigh] should'a used a pail of water, that was it!"
                         - Edmund to Dr Tolan, about "Broom" Helga
Organization: Office of the Dean - CFA, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:27:01 -0500 
From: Liz Fox <lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: DOOL: Lately

On 17-Nov-92 in DOOL:  Lately                
user kelly.smith@cbnewsg.cb.a writes:
>should get back to them as the primary family.  Hell, bring back Mike.
>Let Jack and Jenn go visit Laura.  For crying out loud do anything.
>Julie is a Horton and is constantly ignored.  I would agree that the
>Brady's were the secondary family for a while.  But with Kayla and Steve
>gone, they just don't interest me any more.  The latest incarnations of Roman

(much other wonderful Boysie ranting and raving deleted for brevity)

Sorry Boysie for cutting you short but I wanted to agree with one point....

I think that they should have had MIKE Horton (for god's sake it's her
only brother!) as Abby's godfather and have Marcus be the proxy since
Mike is still in China or Israel or whereverthehellhe is..... He and
Jenn always were VERY close and I think they should have at least
THOUGHT of him (geez, sorry I know - none of these writers ever watched
the show before 1992...)

anyway..great post Boysie (and Spud and Razzle and Roser and whoeverelse
thought that Carly and Bo were the LAST two we would choose for the
CHild's godparents!)

Big B
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: fred@econ.yale.edu (Frederique Vernhes)
Subject: Re: OLTL: Update for Tuesday, 11/17
Organization: Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven, Ct.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:22:56 GMT

In article <Bxys5x.3E7@news.udel.edu> dcannon@bach.udel.edu (Debbie Cannon) writes:
>In article <8f2M6w_00iV1E661Mq@andrew.cmu.edu> Jennifer Allyson Turner <jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>>Trivia questions for this week:
>>
>>WHODUNIT?
>>
>>These three Buchanan women have all been accused of murder (two of them
>>were even convicted).  Who have they been accused of murdering?  Did
>>they really do it?  And if not, whodunit?  For bonus points, can you
>>name which two were convicted?
>>
>>1) Tina
>
>First thing that pops to mind is either Marco/Mario. That storyline
>from WAY back that I can only vaguely remember. I don't know whether
>Tina did it or not, but I *think* Viki tried to take the rap. Not a
>very good guess, but I'm trying :-)
>
I remember now!!!. :)
I don't know if you are referring to the same storyline,
but thanks to the Marco/Mario stuff, I remembered that Cord's mom was
named Maria. That's who Tina was accused of having murdered. I remember
Tina going to statesville too. So I am pretty sure she was convicted.

>Debbie
>
>


-- 
Frederique L. Vernhes	(fred@econ.yale.edu)
	=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:=:
From: oman@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com (Diane at Allen-Bradley in Cleveland)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: Y&R: Ryan/Victor/Victoria
Date: 17 Nov 92 22:15:44 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.134444.15377@seada.com>, sue@snafu.seada.com (Sue Raul) writes:
> Yesterday (Monday) we saw Ryan writing himself a $1,000,000 check
> at the end of the show, with a smirk-in-progress coming out on
> his face.  It almost looks like he thinks he's getting what he
> wanted all along - lots of money.
> 
> But it seems too stupid for Ryan to accept this arrangement.
> Victor can issue a stop-payment on the check.  What's
> Ryan gonna do?  He can't demand that Victor live up to the bargain
> when, by simply accepting the check, he's giving up Victoria (who'll
> "see him for the worthless bum he really is") and giving up his
> leverage.
> 
> Ryan's got no power in this situation.  If he takes the check,
> he loses everything.  Will he realize this???  Will Victor
> stop the check?
> 
> Sue

Linda Hirsch says Ryan tears the check in half in front of Victor.  Don't
know if this is accurate or not.  I saw her on a show a week ago Monday
(11/9).

Di
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: dcannon@bach.udel.edu (Debbie Cannon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: OLTL: Update for Wed., 18NOV92
Date: 20 Nov 92 13:41:51 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

In article <1992Nov20.042938.416@candle.uucp> nuyu@candle.uucp (Christine Momjian) writes:
>Asa talks to Max.  Bo comes in.  Renee' comes in - surpried to see Asa
>there.  

Well, I'm surprised, too!! How did Asa find out? Last thing I
remember Cain wanted to be the one to tell him. Did Cain
tell him or someone else? Maybe this happened on Monday's show,
of which there is no updater :-(.


Debbie
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps