From: jsw@cray.com (Jon S. Wood)
Subject: FEMINISTS ARE UGLY!
Reply-To: jsw@cray.com
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 4 Jan 93 14:14:11 CST

In article 6405@desire.wright.edu, sbishop@desire.wright.edu () writes:
>
  The MAIN reason for child support is
>to try to approximate that the child does not suffer a huge change (for the
>worse) in lifestyle due to the divorce.  THis means if the child was 
>provided a certain standard of living before the divorce, it should not
>then be dumped into total poverty after the divorce.  Evidently you really
>don't understand the logic behind child-support payments.
>Perhaps you should read about the recent court case where the millionaire
>father was forced to pay the court ordered HUGE amounts of child support,
>even though the mother had a very nice income, because the court said that
>the money had been provided the child before the divorce, it must still be
>provided after the divorce.
>Please note: I do think the child was living a totally ridiculous lifestyle..
>
>Sue


 Sue, when women (the majority who file for divorce are women, it doesn't
say why I'll grant you, but the majority are women) divorce today, they
know damn well that they are in all likelyhood going to get the kids and
they know damn well they are going to be "provided a certain standard of
living". 
 Why should kids be sheltered from Mommy's choices? Why should they be
sheltered from reality? 
 If the economic well being of children was the state's BIGGEST concern, 
why in heaven is the state awarding custody to a gender overwhelmingly
when many of the men make more money? Why does it cost men far more to
retain their children than do women? 
 When homes are handed over to women, custody is awarded de facto to women
and child support awards are written to continue the children's living
standard as if the parents had not divorced, I don't believe for a millesec.
that feminists are nearly as interested in children than they are 
at retribution for past evil deeds by men. This rewriting of world history
and anthropology by American Feministas is a joke. The feminist is
only interested in perpetuating a family court system that has 
systematically transfered the greatest amount of wealth from one group
to another our society hasn't seen since the rise and fall of the 
third Riech. This transfer of wealth has not guarenteed the living
standards of children, it has only weakened their chances of success
and emotional well being. Our schools are filled with emotionally
crippled children. You know some of them. 
 Historical revisionism is the style and substance of 'Women's Studies".
This disjointed group of academic elite from eastern established colleges
where a year's tuition exceeds the blue collar workin' mans yearly income
(you can't add health benefits, most rural midwestern working men never
had health benefits) is a joke. These spoiled academic brats have no
understanding of history or life. They're scholarship is based on pop
theories and half-baked plagerised Rolling Stone opeds. Feminism has ignored history.
It is self evident in their facist beliefs in powerful governments to
squelch liberty for THIER agenda. 

 Good bye feministas. Your days are numbered. Your whiny, spoiled, brats,
totally dependent on Daddy and Mommy to pay for your tuition. You've
never worked a day in your life. Hardship is defined by revocation of 
your personal 800 telephone number. Hardtimes are defined by having to
walk to your Miata at the airport. Depression is rampant, not because
of some personal tragedy or pressure, but because the girlfriend broke
up and returned to her boyfriend which ruined your Swiss skiing holiday.

 Feminist's are adult children.
 Feminist thought belongs on Sesame Street.
 Feminisism is led by Gonzo historians whose acid tripped thinking
   is making them a laughing stock world wide. 
 Feminism makes Gloria Steinhem marry rich and write books about self
  esteem. She wouldn't know self esteem if it #$@%#@ her in the #@$.