HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Monogamy, Polygamy, and raising children (Was: Falling in Love
Date: 4 Nov 92 20:24:40 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

quark@asylum.UUCP ( No wonder I'm lost...) writes:

>I'm a child of a single parent. (my father died when I was 2 1/2, and my mom
>never re-married)  I've been accused of not having an intrinsic feeling
>about the "work out the problems" part of relationships.  

My parents have remained married for 33 years, but I also had a problem
with working out problems in relationships, mostly because I never saw my
parents do it. They sheltered me from the problems in their relationship
and so I never learned skills to deal with such things. (Until recently.)

So having two parents doesn't always help on that score.

>Many of the
>people that I've known who grew up with more than two parents (one person
>comes to mind who had 5 "parents" in the house) seemed more able to enjoy
>interactions with more people.

What does that mean? They like crowded parties? They are tolerant of
different kinds of people?

--
Stef                 In the force if Yoda's so strong, construct a 
stef@apple.com       sentence with words in the proper order then 
                     why can't he?                         /fortune
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Last Dance for Now
Date: 11 Nov 92 21:20:05 GMT
Organization: AT&T

Greetings fellow soc.singelites ...

We had some major system problems over the past week making it
impossible to post or read from this location, and today when I
logged in here there are 4500 articles to read.  Right.  That
goes back about a week!  Far too many to catch up.

I just wanted to let you all know that while I've enjoyed the
discussions of the past few weeks, I'm changing to an assignment
for about a year that will take me away from regular net access.

I'm not gone - just on leave.  Hope you all have a great winter and
spring and summer.  And thanks to those of you who sent me the nice
Thanksgiving pictures!  :-)

Take care and don't flame each other *too* much ...
-- 
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Nance Colucci                                      att!ihlpl!colucci
"It'll be better than before.  Yesterday's gone.  Yesterday's gone!"
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
From: kgorman@star-trek.bbn.com (Karen Gorman)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Thoughts
Keywords: Will women ever learn?  I hope I live to see that day.
Date: 5 Nov 92 07:37:39 GMT
Reply-To: kgorman@BBN.COM (Karen Gorman)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: archive.bbn.com


In article <22832@venera.isi.edu> esteward@next11.isi.edu
(Elaine Steward) writes:


|>I was alone after 16 1/2 years of marriage.  It felt awful.  I felt awful  
|>about myself.  It took about 6 months before I could feel any healing  
|>(although I suspect it started before that).  I was 40 when my husband  
|>died.

I'm sorry to hear you suffered such a loss at a young age.

|>"Friends" stopped inviting me places because I was no longer half  
|>of a couple.

This I really take exception to, and it happens all too often.  When I have run
across this *couple* requirement, I find it most annoying, and the kicker is
that usually these couple festivities are for the most part organized by a
woman/women.  One would think that a single woman would find some support from
another woman and invite her to the activity without hesitation, figuring she
might enjoy getting out and socializing, but NO, based on the simple fact that
she is no longer part of a couple...What a sad excuse.  It's this type of
thinking that helps to keep women in the Dark Ages, when they can't even show
support to each other in a time of need, based on some silly unwritten law.  I
think it is terrible and don't subscribe to this reasoning at all, and go well
out of my way to avoid people with such limited thinking.  Of course if one of
the purposes of a festivites is for someone to play matchmaker, then the person
will go out of her way to make sure her single friend attends, but this is the
exception and not the rule.

|>I had no credit (even though it was against the law to deny  
|>me credit).  It felt like my support had been pulled out from under me.   

I can well imagine.

|>All I can tell you is that it does get better.  The pain lessens, you make  
|>new friends (real friends?),

I hope so, and get rid of the immitation friends.

|>and so forth.  If you want to email me,  
|>please use esteward@isi.edu rather than the address on this post. 
|>
|>I wish you well.  Hang in there.

You also!

|>elaine

Karen
kg@bbn.com
From: martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: How the cold war was won. (was: Nightline and Presidential Cantida
Date: 13 Nov 92 06:03:08 GMT
	<1992Nov11.161420.7375@clsi.COM>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: kevin@clsi.COM's message of 11 Nov 92 16:14:20 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.161420.7375@clsi.COM> kevin@clsi.COM (Kevin Cameron) writes:

   In article <721392335.18765@minster.york.ac.uk>, aaron@minster.york.ac.uk writes:
   > : The reason we "won" the cold war is that their economy collapsed before ours
   > : did. The arms race destroyed both our economies, we just outlasted them.
   > 

   Who has actually won ? Isn't it likely that the Russians will be able to
   rebuild their economy faster than the USA can fix its own ? 

Not bloody.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Nightline and Presidential Cantidates
Date: 9 Nov 92 15:39:28 GMT
	<thurlow.720831815@convex.convex.com>
	<MARTINC.92Nov4233432@hatteras.cs.unc.edu>
	<thurlow.721242371@convex.convex.com>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: thurlow@convex.com's message of 8 Nov 92 17:06:11 GMT

In article <thurlow.721242371@convex.convex.com> thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:

   In <MARTINC.92Nov4233432@hatteras.cs.unc.edu> martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

   >Do you think it's fair to claim that foreign corporations are taxed at a
   >lower rate when they're not?  (Look it up, for god's sake.)

   I'd love to, but in defense I notice that nobody in the press and nobody
   in the Republican campaign did that where I heard or read about it, either.
   I find it quite amusing that someone wouldn't have called Clinton on this
   claim you find so ruddy obvious.

You don't read the right things, obviously.  It was covered in the Wall
Street Journal, it was discussed in the Economist.  CNN talked about it
once. 

Why it didn't get more coverage... well, to be charitable, it doesn't
appear that *anyone* in the general-audience press paid much attention
to anything *anyone* said that was substantial.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: rohwerwd@netcom.com (W. David Rohwer)
Subject: Re: THIS IS A TEST
Organization: Netcom - San Jose, CA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 07:33:14 GMT

In article <1.13.uupcb@uuworld.via.mind.ORG> andrew.stark@uuworld.via.mind.ORG (Andrew Stark)  writes:
>        This is a test from uuworld.  Are we getting out?
>

     From the Underworld!!!  Oh my dog, it must be Satan.  Help!!!

Now, Fundies you must go after him or something good will happen.

-- 
       +----------------------------------------------------------------+
      /  Keep Abortion Legal and Safe.  Reduce the Deficit.            /
  +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
 /   //  W. David Rohwer   // Amiga       UUCP: apple!netcom.com!rohwerwd |
|  \X/       Go A's!     \X/ 3000UX   Internet: rohwerwd@netcom.COM      /
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ELVIS@GRACELAND.COM
Subject: THE KING ISO PRISCILLA
Organization: Bull World Wide Information Systems, Billerica MA USA
Date: 12 Nov 92 15:12:56

I can hide a banana in my bellybutton but I'm not particularly fat.

Color me moody blue.

Love,
	Elvis
Xref: sparky soc.singles:30117 talk.abortion:47286 talk.politics.misc:59036
From: an030@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Broward Horne)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.abortion,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: PRES DEBATE
Date: 9 Nov 92 05:33:38 GMT
Reply-To: an030@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Broward Horne)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, rohwerwd@netcom.com (W. David Rohwer) says:

>>>>David, you should know that I, at least, of the Bush supporters am not stupid.
>>>>I just don't think that Clinton or Perot will get the job done that will need
>>>>to be done in the next four years to bring America back.
>>
>
>     I believe that Bush or Clinton will bankrupt the USA and I do not
>want to be here in the USA when that happens.
>

        Exactly right.  Here's a list of potential places to
   ride it out. :)

       Fiji, Tonga, Venezeula, Uruguay, New Zealand, 
       Caymen Islands, Trinidad, Dominica.  Perhaps British
       Honduras, Guyana, Brazil, Chile, Switzerland ( if you can
        afford it ), Paraguay.>-- 
>       +----------------------------------------------------------------+
>      /  Keep Abortion Legal and Safe.  Reduce the Deficit.            /
>  +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> /   //  W. David Rohwer   // Amiga       UUCP: apple!netcom.com!rohwerwd |
>|  \X/       Go A's!     \X/ 3000UX   Internet: rohwerwd@netcom.COM      /
>+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: ISO MY PRINCESS
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 22:26:55 GMT

In article <92317.225317WJB117@psuvm.psu.edu> WJB117@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>I AM LOOKING FOR A NICE WHITE FEMALE IN PENNSYLVANIA.   Between the ages of 20-
>23 years old. I have brown hair, brown eyes, 6'2" big billed, and a junior in p
                                                   ^^^ ^^^^^^
>enn State university. My major is nursing so if your looking for that speacial
>attention at any hour please send mail. I just might become your personal male
>nurse. by the way here is a rose for you until you send me mail.
>--------<--------<------<------<----<@
>Until we type again. Love Bill

Er, gang, is this the first instance of a personal ad being posted here by
a very large duck?

Trygve   (Who has always prefered moas anyway.)
From: Bathsheba.Grossman@launchpad.unc.edu (Bathsheba Grossman)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Argh! Total, Complete misery.
Date: 10 Nov 92 06:15:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: samba.1992Nov10.061505.28732
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service

In article <1992Nov9.180508.17394@eua.ericsson.se> euamts@eua.ericsson.se writes:
>#compartmentalized.  Depressed people typically do think of themselves
>#as being unworthy of happiness, and find that their unhappiness spreads
>#into other parts of their lives beyond whatever frustrated goal that's
>#the immediate problem.
>
>This is not generally true, from the same reason as above. I had the first
>depression in my life two weeks ago (slowly coming up now), and this was
>from this "Jeeesus - why on earth should *I* be so out of luck?" reason.
>Mats Henricson

Po' baby.  How long did the dreadful thing last, 72 whole hours?  Were you
near death?  I fear that the standards for depression hereabouts are such
that you had best not generalize beyond your means.

-Sheba
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: That wacky electoral college
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 08:18:56 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1992Nov9.202824.3482@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> smith@comm.mot.com (Jeff Smith) writes:
>|> >4. Line item veto!
>|> Sounds good to me, but doesn't this put the president into the budget
>|> process where he isn't constitutionally supposed to be?
>How?  It seems to me that all the line item veto does is prevent Congress
>from stringing meaningless or downright bad items along with larger bills.
>The effect would be that when a bill goes before the president, it would
>be cohesive, logically. I don't understand how this could be bad.

It gives the president >far< too much power to specfically eliminate things 
that the president 'feels un-necessary'. It bites to close to 'taxation
without representation'- its >our< money that congress is spending, and since
congress is, constitutionally, the 'peoples' branch of government, taking the
power out of the hands of congress (despite arguments about how bad congress
is, the people are the ones who elect them in continually, we've only ourselves
to blame) and putting it into the hands of the president unbalances the power.

What I've been advocating is an >amendment< veto power for the president. Give
the president the power to veto any amendment to any bill. That would reduce
waste and the pork barrel spending that currently goes on in congress.  The
president could then veto any bill >or any amendment to a bill<. Look at what
happens with a lot of current bills- little tagged on items get stuck onto
bills that the president is 'sure to sign' so those things get approved with
the rest of the package, or bills are vetoed out of existance because of some
clause or rider the president doesn't like. Now the baby won't have to be
thrown out with the bathwater.

The power to line-item through bills belongs to Congress, and should stay there.

r.

Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.abortion,talk.politics.misc
From: rickh@ldgo.columbia.edu (rick healy)
Subject: Global Warming
Organization: Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 18:07:03 GMT

>>kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Me) writes:

>>>Considering Al Gore's views on the environment, especially his buying
>>>into that foolishness-of-the-week known as global warming, I disagree.

>>What are you refuting, that the globe is warme than it used to be?

>I'm not refuting it, I am disputing it.  The globe is not warmer than
>it "used to be."  In fact, it was much warmer in the Holocene, for
>example.  But to the point, I am disputing that the globe is getting
>warmer than it has been in recent history, and furthermore I am
>disputing that it might be getting warmer due to human activities.
-----
  The fact is the earth has gotten several degrees warmer since records were
first consistantly being taken (about 1850). Whether or not it's due to human
activities is a case in dispute, but all general circulation model (GCMs) show
that increasing the CO2 in the atmosphere causes the global temperature to rise.
The models vary as to how much of increase there would be (2 - 5 degrees Celsius).
-----
>As to who is correct, well, the scientists seem to be doing a good job
>refuting claims of global warming.  (Are you old enough to remember
>the discussions of a new ice age during the cold winters of 77-79?)
-----
Do you mean global warming due to greenhouse gases? No scientist I've heard of
would dispute the basic fact that the earth is warming. Four of the past
ten years have seen record breaking global mean temperatures.
-----
>>That the hole in the ozone over antartica isn't getting steadily bigger?

>Last I heard its size was erratic, and in no way could it be said to be
>steadily increasing in size.
-----
Not over the south pole. Perhaps you heard about the erratic behaviour
of the ever expanding  ozone hole over the northern hemisphere.
-----
>>Or that these facts are unrelated to the increasing levels
>>of various ozone-depleting chemicals in the air?

>The first of these alleged "facts" is allegedly due to increased
>production of so-called "greenhouse gases," which are not
>"ozone-depleting" chemicals at all, but things such as carbon dioxide
>and methane.  The second of these alleged facts may be due to
>man-made ozone-destroying chemicals, but may also be due to sunspot
>activity.
-----
   CFC's are ozone depleting chemicals and they are manmade. It only takes
one chlorine atom to wipe out thousands of O3 molecules. How could a sun-spot
affect the ozone in the atmosphere? Perhaps you mean there is a correlation?
----- 

>If you have any science to back up your claims, feel free to post it.
-----
  If you have any facts to back up yours...

-Rick Healy

Climate & Oceanography Research
Lamont-Doherty Geoligical Observatory
of Columbia University
-- 
Rick Healy
NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies
2880 Broadway
New York, NY 10025
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: That wacky electoral college
Date: 6 Nov 92 15:57:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: grover.MARTINC.92Nov6105736
	<1992Nov4.144109.7037@infonode.ingr.com> <96094@netnews.upenn.edu>
	<1992Nov4.185213.25303@sr.com>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: dks@sr.com's message of 4 Nov 92 18:52:13 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.185213.25303@sr.com> dks@sr.com (Dave K. Sprow) writes:
   So we can either talk more about this stuff or not.  Except that Martin,
   I believe you owe me something like 82 cents :-)

You can call me Charlie.  And unless you know of someplace I can get a
coin-op electronic funds transfer machine, you'll need to send your
physical address.

(But it's interesting to note that if you'd have taken the original bet,
you'd owe me 86 cents.)
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
From: jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JOSEPH ALOYSIUS MCVEIGH)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Do you remember 1970 to 1980?
Date: 12 Nov 92 20:50:54 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

GCTHORNE@idbsu.idbsu.edu writes:
>
>      As part of an impromptu research project, I'd like to know what
>  YOU think the single most important ( dramatic, traumatic ) event of`
>  1970 to 1980 was.

When the Mets traded Tom Seaver.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Aloysius McVeigh | "In our mutual sincerity we might be able to show a
   jm0i@.Lehigh.edu     |  road to the salvation of America's very soul."
      "N.I.N.A."        |                                         - Malcolm X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: I didn't do it
Date: 12 Nov 92 20:12:25 GMT
	<1992Nov4.072914.19347@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
	<1992Nov5.180142.26353@cbnews.cb.att.com>
	<MARTINC.92Nov12150724@hatteras.cs.unc.edu>
Distribution: soc
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu's message of 12 Nov 92 20:07:24 GMT

Silly ass postnews program.  My careful explanation that I was reposting
this anonymously to protect the ... innocent ... disappeared.

In article <MARTINC.92Nov12150724@hatteras.cs.unc.edu> martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
Path: borg!news_server!martinc
   From: martinc@hatteras.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
   Newsgroups: soc.singles
   Date: 12 Nov 92 20:07:24 GMT
   References: <1992Nov3.052855.24310@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1992Nov3.180041.15735@sol.UVic.CA> <1992Nov4.072914.19347@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1992Nov5.180142.26353@cbnews.cb.att.com>
   Sender: news@cs.unc.edu
   Distribution: soc
   Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
   Lines: 28



   In article <1992Nov5.180142.26353@cbnews.cb.att.com>
   eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (eleanor.j.evans) writes:

   >Houseguests of mine were _extremely_ thoughtful.  They left behind
   >just such thick, soft cotton ropes tied to the feet of my (guest) 
   >double bed.  Now, wasn't that sweet??
   >
   >
   >Piglet, who rather supposes they were left as an apology for
   >        keeping me awake all night.....talking

   We didn't keep you awake all night talking.  One of us was fairly
   quiet; while the other one was loud, "talking" normally requires some
   degree of coherence.

   _I_ think it was the two boyfriends you had visiting who kept you
   awake.

   <Anonymous>

   --
		   Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
	Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	       3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
	"Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
	 to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (eleanor.j.evans)
Subject: Re: Argh! Total, Complete misery.
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 18:01:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.072914.19347@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>
>Trygve   (Who doesn't mind being in captivity from time to time, but
>          prefers thick, soft cotton rope--handcuffs tend to be 
>          uncomfortable and too small while scarves tend to tear if
>          I start to struggle at all.) 


Houseguests of mine were _extremely_ thoughtful.  They left behind
just such thick, soft cotton ropes tied to the feet of my (guest) 
double bed.  Now, wasn't that sweet??


Piglet, who rather supposes they were left as an apology for
        keeping me awake all night.....talking
Xref: sparky soc.singles:30420 ba.singles:2134
From: diana@wetware.com (CatWoman )
Newsgroups: soc.singles,ba.singles
Subject: Re: YKYBRNTLW.... (Re: Where to meet women?)
Date: 12 Nov 92 04:11:04 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Castle WetWare MouseCatcher

kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:

] aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
] >gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews) writes:
] 
] >>Spots before the eyes.....need more sex.
] >Uh, Gerg, you *do* know what a ProblemOlderWoman is, right?
] 
] One who doesn't like sex every day?

Kiran, Kiran, Kiran...

You have obviously NOT been paying attention.

We ProblemOlderWomen can only get the title
when we want sex MORE than our ProblemYoungerMen...

THAT is the Problem!!!

Diana
(the ORIGINAL ProblemOlderWoman)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.men,soc.women
From: daniel@clsi.COM (Daniel Barclay)
Subject: Re: What do you Am men think about Am women?
Organization: CAD Language Systems Inc.
	<1992Nov5.204118.26325@b8.b8.ingr.com>
Date: 9 Nov 92 10:16:19

My net-news connection was down for the last couple of days.  Can someone 
please forward me any other (before Larry's of 5 Nov) responses to my male-/
female-bashing response?  
Thanks.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel S. Barclay			CAD Language Systems, Inc.
					Suite 101, 5457 Twin Knolls Rd.
Why can't _I_ think of a signature?	Columbia, MD  21045  USA
Newsgroups: soc.singles