From: pino@envmsa.eas.asu.edu (Anthony)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.asean
Subject: Re: More replies (long...)
Date: 14 Apr 92 22:01:00 GMT
Organization: Arizona State University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <92105.002617ASCKN@ASUACAD.BITNET>, ASCKN@ASUACAD.BITNET (C. K. Ng) writes...
> 
>In article <1992Apr12.125116.25869@eve.wright.edu>, slam@eve.wright.edu (Sau
>Chun Lam) says:
>>
>>In article <1992Apr9.1378.a0012@moe.gov.sg> tansm@moe.gov.sg writes:
>>>Chee Keong Ng writes:
>>>
>>>> A graduate of National University of Singapore, 1986
>>>
>>>That makes you a very rich man or else your mum or dad must be very rich.
>>>Else how on earth can you be studying in the US when you are suppose to
>>>server your 3 years bond in Singapore?  Am I missing something here.
>>>If my assumption is correct, you must have put up close to S$200K to have
>>>your bond defered.  You must be a rich guy then and should I then
>>>conclude that your IQ wasn't that high either?
>>>
>>>Just a thought and we remember you. Have you fill up your PIPS form yet?
>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> I really hate to talk to someone who either doesn't get the fact right
>or someone who is ignorant of the real situation.  Go and ask around,
>and find out how many of 1986 NUS graduates were released b'cos they
>could prove to the S'pore govt that they couldn't find a job then.
>I was a lucky one of them.  Do you see now, my ignorant and self-claimed
>NOT-SO-BIG-BROTHER?  If you want, I can still introduce my parents, who
>are still tapping rubber, to you so that your "real picture" can be
>verified.
>                  |             |
>>                 |             |
>>Now we see the real picture. BIG BROTHER is watching you!!!!!
>>
>>As a reminder tansm or whatever, I do not particularly like your use of
>>Internet to openly threaten an individual, rich, poor, grad or
>                    ^^^^^^^^
>When did I ever threaten an individual?  Did I do that here, or your
>memory is so bad or your English comprehension is so poor that you can't
>even differentiate what is an immature posting from an intellectual
>thoghout-provoking contribution!  Most of my posting here concern ISSUES,
>tell me what are your postings here focus on?  Malaysian next premier?
>Hereditary rulers and Malaysian Chinese?  Asean economic issues?  Response
>to ADB's forecast?  Just tell me what your contributions are?  You MAYBE
>enjoying Roach's postings only.  :)
>

   I wonder whether you have read the original posting by 
tansm@moe.gov.sg?  I think you misfired totally..tsk tsk tsk tsk tsk

>>otherwise. If Chee Keong has not done his paperwork or whatever, GO
>>THROUGH OFFICIAL CHANNELS. This is not the place for you to exercise
>>your power or authority as a bureacrat. *THIS IS NOT SINGAPORE!*
>>                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Did I ever say this is Singapore?  Or did you dream that I say this is
>Singapore???
> 
> 
>>Get a life bud!
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Judging from you attitude as per reflected by your ignorance, I sicerely
>think that you desperately need to get a life more for yourself than
>anyone else.  May the Lord enlighten you in such pursuit, Amen.
>

   May you be enlightened too, Amen.  Go read the articles again.

>>
>>SC Lam - slam@eve.wright.edu
> 
>p.s.  I would have replied to your above posting using the reply mode,
>      but my second thought kept on reminding me of the common saying
>      that the best way to teach an ignorant, and most probably filthy rich,
>      brat like you is to resort to "a tooth for a tooth, an eye for an
>      eye" strategy.