Newsgroups: alt.activism
Subject: Re: `Never Fear: I Shall Never Give up'
From: kmcvay@oneb.almanac.bc.ca (Ken Mcvay)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 20:26:11 GMT
Organization: The Old Frog's Almanac, Vancouver Island, CANADA

In article <110-PCNews-124beta@ccs.covici.com> covici@ccs.covici.com writes:

>              `NEVER FEAR: I SHALL NEVER GIVE UP'

>   Presidential Candidate
>   Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
>   July 20, 1992

>   First of all, two things are obvious. George Bush is still
>the disaster he was up to this point. He has not improved lately.
>I would not be surprised if he were to resign for health reasons,
>but knowing George's health a little bit, I wouldn't be surprised
>if he refused to resign and just stubbornly clung to the
>position, at least for awhile--despite the fact that what is
>obvious about his health conditions, even at a distance observing
>him in his few public appearances, the man is sick. 

Whether or not Bush is a "disaster" I will leave to the Yanks, given this
election year.... the statement above is confusing (to put it mildly) aside
from the 'disaster' comment.

>I would not be surprised if he were to resign for health reasons,
>but knowing George's health a little bit, I wouldn't be surprised
>if he refused to resign and just stubbornly clung to the
>position, at least for awhile--despite the fact that what is

What has the "what you know about the man's health" got to do with Bush
being stubborn? Re-read the felon's statement and see if you can make any
sense of it <sheesh>.

>obvious about his health conditions, even at a distance observing
>him in his few public appearances, the man is sick. 

I watched him today during a news conference, and I'd have to say he looks a
great deal healthier than a good many other folks his age. I don't think he
looks (even remotely) ill. Perhaps LaRouche asserts this sort of nonsense in
the hope everyone will simply accept the word of a felon without question...
sort of the ultimate gesture of contempt for his "electorate," wouldn't you
say?

>   On the other side, it is not at all unfair to describe the
>Clinton-Gore ticket as a pair of Southern fried fascists who are
>focusing on the worst element in society and putting people who
>might be individually salvageable, but who as a group are fairly
>described as guppies, that is, greedy yuppies: that all other
>significant constituencies in society are being essentially
>ignored by this ticket. 

Which "worst element" is LaRouche referring to here? (If, in fact, he's
doing anything but babbling. If by "worst element" he means those "greedy
yuppies" (whatever the hell that means), then is he favouring communism or
socialism rather than capitalism? What's wrong with wanting to acquire
capital? What specific planks in the Dem. platform support the felon's
assertion that everyone but the "greedy yuppies" is being "essentially"
ignored?

>   One's alarm on this concern is increased in several ways.

One's alarm can only be increased during consideration of the felon's mental
condition!

>First of all, that the Clinton-Gore ticket is an anti-industrial
>ticket; it's a post-industrial society ticket in the extreme,
>which is the worst possible thing in terms of policy that could
>happen to the United States at this time. The attempt to

Wait a minute - before you call it the "worst possible thing in terms of
policy," you might do well to describe just what it is you are talking
about, rather than glossing over the issue in the hope everyone will ignore
it.

>implement the kind of policy that Gore Clinton represent could
>only become a fascist state in the full or medium term. The
>appeal to the guppies, that is, the greedy yuppies of suburbia
>gives the sociological basis for fascism matching the fascism of
>the kind of policy which Clinton and Gore so far represent. 

I give up.
-- 
"Also, our records do not support that Mr. Leuchter performed either
consulting or any service...I can attest that the planning and work was
performed by the Department of Correction Engineering Section and our
institution maintenance department." Signed: Gary T. Dixon, Warden NC
Newsgroups: alt.activism,soc.motss,talk.politics.misc,alt.individualism