From: larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: "Family Values" in Hollywood
Date: 21 Jul 92 21:47:57 GMT
	<1992Jul19.224052.7978@fs7.ece.cmu.edu>
	<LARRY.92Jul20103041@peak.psl.nmsu.edu> <BrpyHr.Hn2@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: New Mexico State University, MetaPhysical Science Laboratory

In article <BrpyHr.Hn2@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tbuckley@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Tim Buckley) writes:

   >Apparently it isn't just us Evil Liberals who question Quayle's fitness
   >for office. Remember when Bush had his little heart murmur? How many of
   >the president's staunch supporters were in a tizzy over the prospect of
   >Quayle taking the helm?

   No I don't remember.  Why not address the issue instead of making
   another unsubstantiated accusation?
   How many and who were they.  It is easy to talk.  If you're right fine
   but as of yet I have seen no evidence in your posts -- only rhetoric.

Hey, if you want to filter out rhetoric, we'll have to eliminate most of
what Rush and faithful Dittodom are saying here too.

I don't doubt that you don't remember Tim. You have the same selective
memory that afflicts most of us apparently. And you probably think that
Dan Quayle is a fine vice president. Your opinion and my opinion are
different. I remember the things that agree with my viewpoint and forget
those that disagree too. So what?

And, I make no pretention that my posts aren't, in most cases, my OPINION.
I state that on my .sig, along with a full sized smiley, if it means anything.
I don't see everything you post making specific reference to something
published in a newspaper or broadcast, or otherwise "documented" either.

The truth, old buddy, is that many of us who voted for Bush (which I am
one) question the fitness of Dan Quayle for a high school debate, let
alone the presidency of the U.S. I have no doubt that the man is a fine
human being. I just don't have any confidence of his ability to become
president if it comes to it. 

  >
  >Also, Mikko, you just go right ahead and be as resentful of my "unsupported"
  >implications as you wish.

   Well I'd say he has a right to be resentful.  He asked for evidence you
   responded with rhetoric.  Provide solid meaninful evidence and the
   discussion will elevate.  This is pretty simple.  Just look up the date
   (try the NY Times index) of the President's illness and then give us the
   quotes from the Republicans who expressed concern about Dan Quayle.  If
   they are there you will have won a point.  As it is you provide us with
   nothing more than your memory.  I hope your not offended if I ask for
   something more substantive.

Would you feel better if I re-posted the top 200 quayle quotes from his
speeches and diplomatic duties? I could download them from alt.humor 
for you.

Why would I be offended? While I go off and search out the Liberal Media
for some reference to support my contention, you go off and see if you can
find one describing the nation's great relief that we had Dan Quayle
ready to step in and take over in that moment of potential crisis.

L.
"Yeh, Buddy..            | larry@psl.nmsu.edu (Larry Cunningham)|  _~~_
 I've got your COMPUTER! | % Physical Science Laboratory        | (O)(-)
 Right HERE!!"           | New Mexico State University          |  /..\ 
 (computer THIS!)        | Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 88003    |   <> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are CORRECT, mine, and not PSLs or NMSUs..
Yo! Bottoms up! US motto. Boy!
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3698 alt.rush-limbaugh:2941