HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak)
Subject: Re: DOOL:  various things
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 19:33:22 GMT

In article <1992Jul21.181630.17016@cbfsb.cb.att.com> kjs@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (kelly.smith) writes:
>
>Hola folks.  I have just a few comments.


Yeah, "a few", I bet!  :-)


>For starters, I still dislike Kimberly immensely and am not
>looking forward to any story involving her.  I have never
>liked her (or Shane for that matter).  I think both characters
>are one dimensional.  I don't understand how TPTB can write
>some wonderful story for her and not Kayla.  Now some folks
>(Tim) say that this was not a 'trade'.  Maybe not really but
>now they're bringing in a love interest for her???  Excuse me,
>but Classic Rob and Kayla could have been a story.  Kayla could
>have felt guilty for leaving Shane, sought solace in Rob's arms,
>.....etc, etc.  I just don't buy this at all.  And how long
>will Kim stick around this time?  The whole thing just stinks.


Sure Kayla and Rob I could have been a great couple!  But that still has
nothing to do with Kim coming back.  I contend that Kim would have been
returning about now regardless of what is going on with Kayla.  And 
let's not forget, Kim saw Rob first anyway!  :-)


>The news of Ginger, Brian, Molly and Tanner leaving sucks.
>Before the past couple of weeks I might not have minded but,
>I now think they have (or should I say had) potential.  What
>are they going to do with Vern?  


I like Joanna's idea.  Where's that toaster?  


>It's a shame and a waste of
>talent.  I think they have improved tremendously since their
>debuts.  I would have rather they get rid of Jesse and Scarrie
>as the teen couple.


I'll go along with that one.


>BTW, did anyone see the commercial for Days with
>Tanner and Molly talking about getting closer?  IMHO Molly
>look absolutely gorgeous.


I think Molly has looked INCREDIBLE lately!!!

>Oh well must get back to work.
>
>Boysies.


Me too, I suppose.  Thanks for checking in.
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
|  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
|  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: tac@moe.SanDiego.NCR.COM (C. Corvin)
Subject: Re: ATWT: TAN: Polish people
Reply-To: tac@moe.SanDiego.NCR.COM (C. Corvin)
Organization: NCR Corp. E & M San Diego
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 19:55:46 GMT

>borz@aspenhi.stortek.com (Janet Borzuchowski) writes:
>
> 
> Hi again,
>For all the inquiring minds, Borzuchowski is Polish.  My grandparents on bot
> 
> 	Janet Borzuchowski
>

Greetings to another of the rare breed of Polish soap fans.  I too am 100%
pure Polish.  My parents were both born in Poland.  They met and married
in Chicago although their birthplaces were neighboring cities.   Anyway,
my dad changed our name when my brothers started school, and he started
moving up the business latter since it's pronounciation and spelling were
difficult.  It was CHMUROWICZ (who-more-of-itch) but he changed it to 
CORVIN which is the name of his father's code of arms in Poland before
the war did away with such history.  That way our name still relates to
our family history but it's more manageable.  Anyway,  I have a whole
army of relatives with names as challenging as yours.  I'd say something
polish to you, but I couldn't even imagine how to spell the language.

                                     Tina

*******************************************************************
Tina Corvin
tac@sun4.SanDiego.NCR.COM
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: faa@artemis.cs.wayne.edu (Felicitas A. Atabong)
Subject: Re: B&B - this week
Organization: Wayne State University
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 17:23:28 GMT

In article <1992Jul20.180405.6901@dmntor.UUCP> toni@dmntor.UUCP (Toni Spurgeon) writes:
>
>Okay, before I post the look ahead... can someone please
>clear up Ridge's romantic history for me? First, he's married
>to Caroline (who looks just like Karen, who was long lost?!)
>then he has an affair with his father's wife Brooke and in
>no time at all that's all done with and he marries Taylor,
>who was Caroline's doctor? I think these are the facts...
>but how do we feel about this guy? Is he really in love
>with Brooke? with Taylor? will he fall for Karen because
>she looks like Caroline? Is he flighty? Which romance
>was the most romantic? I'm confused as to whether Brooke
>is a good gal, or the tramp that everyone keeps calling her!
>She seems pretty bitchy with Eric... what's their story?
>(I'm figuring out that Brooke stole Eric away from Stephanie,
>but when did she go after Ridge?)
>

When the show began Ridge was about to marry Caroline, but ofcourse, he
slept with someone else and Bill Spencer(Caroline's father) got the
pictures. He ended up finding comfort in Brooke but ofcourse was still
in love with Caroline who was now married to Thorne his brother. They
all played around for a while, and then Caroline divorced Thorn. With
Caroline now free, Ridge chose her over Brooke(I personally felt it was
a rich girl gets everything storyline). They had the perfect marriage,
during which Brooke fell in love with Eric(I don't think she stole him
from Steph. They weren't that happy together anyway). Perfect marriages
hardly last on soaps, so ofcourse Caroline gets ill and dies, which
leaves Ridge free, and Brooke wants him back.

I never thought of Brooke as a tramp. I just hate the fact that she
wants Ridge so much. Ridge has always chosen women over her. While
Caroline was married to Thorne, I believe he was using her. She worked
very hard to be accepted by the Forresters. I feel bad about the way
she's treating Eric, but I do believe we can thank the way she's gotten
treated by Stephanie and Ridge for that. Eric used to be in love with
Brooke's mother, and Stephanie went through all lengths to destroy their
family. That was long before Brooke and Eric got involved.
From: kd1@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (karen.dworkin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GH: John Stamos (Blackie) appearance
Summary: more in about John Stamos on GH
Date: 21 Jul 92 18:41:25 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <6110147@hplsla.hp.com>, renees@hplsla.hp.com (Renee Slocumb) writes:
> Sometime soon, (this week?) while Scotty, Dom and Julia are in San Francisco
> they are supposed to run into none other than Full House star John Stamos!
> 
> Will Scotty recognize him?  Will he notice a resemblance to Blackie?
> 

Actually I read in the paper that John Stamos will be appearing on the
July 23rd episode.  He will be playing himself.  Scotty will approach
him, recognize him and tell him that he has the best hair on TV.  Should
be a pretty funny scene.
From: jang8728@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (J.A.Novotny-Dura )
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Just what time IS it? (SPOILERS)
Keywords: huh? when? who?
Date: 24 Jul 92 16:23:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.BrwIuD.54q
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

pamela@keps.kodak.com (Pamela Blalock) writes:

>In article <1992Jul23.022942.2095@cbnewsc.cb.att.com> dwv@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (Dave Vollman) writes:
>>OK writers, I've got to bust you on this one. When Edmund said
>>to Brooke that he ran into Dimitri at the
>>hunting lodge before he went to New York a *couple of weeks
>>ago *. Ahemmmm .... Excuse me, unless I have my AMC time line
>>jumbled in my head, He would have run into the Dimrod at the
>>lodge *Yesterday*. 

>When just a few minutes before Dimwit was still referring to it as
>yesterday. He said he had to go back to NY to meet with the same
>business associate he met with yesterday in NY!

>Obviously Edmund's writer and Dimitri's writer don't speak to 
>each other and probably have the same dislike that Eddie and Dim 
>have for each other.

>Does anyone at AMC actually watch the show??? I think not!

  
   Maybe Dim was playing hot shot and trying to get through just
   one scene without leaning on his ever faithful cue cards, hence
   screwing the days up.  Did anyone else notice the way Dim pounced on
   his cue card Wed ...  It was after the party and Angelique and Dim
   (and someone else...?) were in the Weirdwind front room and Angelique
   said something about how he managed to escape the party for quite
   awhile, then he sort of laughed and lunged past her for the cue card,
   nearly trampling her on the way.  He completely read the next couple
   lines right from the card.   Did anyone else see this?  

       Jan
From: jdale@nsfuvax (JANE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN-Is anyone reading?
Date: 26 Jul 92 01:40:00 GMT
Organization: Mathematics Computer Network, University of Oklahoma
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Jul25.152733.8397@IRO.UMontreal.CA>, laviers@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Cocotte Minute) writes...
>In article <1992Jul23.130936.1972@brandonu.ca> pitzel@brandonu.ca writes:
>>I don't mean to whine, but I am quite upset that people apparently do not take
>>the time to read other people's posts lately.  I know that I mentioned the
>>Erica with strawberry thing long before anyone else posted it, and frankly I
>>wonder if anyone takes time to even read other posts.  Any comments on this
>>would be welcomed.  (I have noticed this with other posts as well, ie. people
>>mentioning things for the "first time" when in reality there had been a post
>>made previously that the individual obviously didn't read).
>>
>>Diane Pitzel
>>Brandon University
> 
>I know how you feel! I guess so many things get posted that some get
>lost in the shuffle. Or perhaps sometimes posts take longer than others
>to reach the net?
>I know it can be frustrating sometimes, but keep posting !! :)
> 
>Genevieve

                      ***Geez, Now I feel really bad,  Genevieve, your
                         posts are always so positive!  I just responded
                         to this post and I feel it was really negative.
                          If course  we want Diane to keep posting. 

                            Thanks for making me see that.
                                                        *** j.


>--
>_____________________________________________________________________________
>|Sebastien Lavier [Calimero]    | Centre de recherche, Hopital du Sacre-Coeur  
>|laviers@iro.umontreal.ca       | "The opinions expressed here are mine and  
>|Universite de Montreal, Canada |   should also be yours!"
From: darcy@panix.com (Darcy Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: The smooth Carter Jones
Date: 30 Jul 92 19:05:57 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC

In article <1992Jul30.055832.10407@leland.Stanford.EDU> thompson@waldron.Stanford.EDU (Sharon Thompson) writes:
>
>Did Brooke REALLY buy Carter's "I read Tempo every day in jail and just
>HAD to come work for the magazine when I got out" story??  I didn't
>think she was that clueless.And why were they all at Tempo working so

i thought this was SOOOOO STUPID! 

don't you know people... the hot magazines circulating prisons are New York
magazine.. Vanity Fair... and lest we forget Town and Country!!!!

>work on that Edmund could yell at him to get to work.  Didn't he just
>meet Brooke YESTERDAY (we're still on the day after the garden party,
>right??).  

i was wondering with all the time this guy has to go around when he has this
BIG deadline.. where does he find the time to harrass galen AND go to a
concert??  

>I loved it when Stephen told Galen (while trying to convince her that he
>should move in) "We've been seeing each other for months" and she

i was thinking.. uh oh... stephen playing the rescuer again!


-- 
Darcy D. Lee
			BI BY NATURE!
darcy@panix.com
cmcl2!panix!darcy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kudra@hubcap.clemson.edu (sallie j kudra)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Hair Forever!
Organization: Clemson University
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 17:25:36 GMT

scduncan@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Sean C. Duncan, Idiot) writes:

>Dammit....

>First people dissin' my man Tanner for having long hair and "looking like a
>woman" now people are getting on JACK's case for having long hair?

>As a LongHairedMan (tm) I feel the need to stick up for my brethren and to
>try to enlighten y'all.  Now, lie down, relax and bring yourself into a
>hypnotic trance.  Then, read this:

>		Jack and Tanner look fine.  Gosh, I wish more men
>		  in soaps had long hair.
>		Jack and Tanner look fine.  Gosh, I wish more men
>                  in soaps had long hair.
>		Jack and Tanner look fine.  Gosh, I wish more men
>                  in soaps had long hair.
>		Jack and Tanner look fine.  Gosh, I wish more men
>                  in soaps had long hair.
>		Jack and Tanner look fine.  Gosh, I wish more men
>                  in soaps had long hair.

>Of course, this will cause your hair follicles to go nuts, depsite your 
>gender and will, of course, make you a person of the nineties, where fashion
>dictates "the longer, the sexier!!"

>Thank you, and keep that hair growin'!
>:-)

>later,
>-- 
>Sean C. Duncan, scd@einstein.bgsu.edu :: scduncan@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu
>"BOB Is Our Hope/Jesus is Our BOB/Jesus Is BOB Hope" - Anonymous SubGenius
>__________________________________________________________________________ 


Hear, hear.  I'm a product of the sixties and can't understand all the negative
reaction to long-hair on men.  Jeez, my husband's hair was over 2 ft. long not
too many years ago (I was extremely jealous since it is straight and fine), and
now it's cut short on top, but below his collar in the back.

Besides which, Jack looks MUCHO better with his hair longer and not greased 
back like it was a year ago.  Tanner's was looking a little poofy there for  
awhile, but looks mahvelous in the ponytail.  

Sallie "I love long-hair and facial hair on men" Kudra

PS.  I can't seem to post successfully to this group, but have no trouble
     doing followups.  Can someone give me some hints.  I post to 
     rec.arts.tv.soaps and was told to let the distribution default to 
     rec.  I can see my posts, but when I asked for replies if it was seen,
     I got none.  Hmmm.... Maybe everybody does hate me.  Getting a little
     paranoid here.  Any help would be appreciated.


* BITNET:   KUDRA@CLEMSON.CLEMSON.EDU | All opinions are my own:              * 
* INTERNET: KUDRA@ITC.CLEMSON.EDU     |            I'm too old to change now! *
* Sallie Kudra, Information Systems Development, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC   *
Xref: sparky rec.arts.tv.soaps:26631 rec.arts.tv:15399
From: art@wvus.org (Art Nicolaysen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: HF: It's back. YEAH!
Date: 27 Jul 92 00:49:01 GMT
Reply-To: art@wciu.edu (Art Nicolaysen)
Distribution: na
Organization: World Vision U.S.

In article <1992Jul21.170528.24519@bogart.uucp> 
cjaeger@bogart.uucp (Cecilia Jaeger) writes:
>Hi Everyone,
>	Homefront reruns begin tonight (Tuesday July 21). Yeah!
>Tonight is the first episode. [Which I missed I and have been waiting 
>forever for.] ABC at 9:30 est. If you haven't seen this show give it a try. 
>
>	According to this week TV Guide, the episode to be shown next week
>has never been aired before. It is about Mike Sloan's funeral. Apparently
>they producers thought it would turn off viewers to have such a depressing 
>episode early in the season. [ed. Note. I guess that means we will really 
>need our tissues for this one.]

Ditto to the much-needed return of a quality program like "HF". It's
mostly because of the viewers speaking their minds to "tell" the
networks what some people would like to see.  If more true supporters
watch it, and tell their friends to do likewise, it may actually
survive.  Although I am a fan, I'm afraid it may go the way of "Lou
Grant" and not last too much longer, unless it gets the ratings the
network wants to see. ("Paper Chase" is another example). Keep up the
good P.R.

Also, did anybody happen to tape that episode??


Debbie (posting from a friend's account)


-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
  "A classic is a book that people       | Art Nicolaysen    art@wvus.org
   buy, and then don't bother to read" 	 |
  		     Mark Twain		 | (somewhere in los angeles county)
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------

>
>
>				Ceci
>-- 
>+--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+
>|   Ceci Jaeger      | Internet: cjaeger@bogart.UUCP		             |
>|   ---- ------      | UUCP:  ...uunet!media!ka3ovk!irscscm!bogart!cjaeger   |
>+--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+
>|  Washington, DC    | May your camel spit nothing but dates. :-)            |
>|                    |    -- M*A*S*H                                         |
>+--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------+


--
From: RMDELC01@ULKYVM.LOUISVILLE.EDU ("588-0803")
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL: Molly's Dad?
Date: 21 Jul 92 13:38:45 GMT


I was just wondering if we ever found out what was the
deal with Molly's dad Rusty?  Or was that yet another
storyline that was dropped?

A Curious Guavita

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: GAINES@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu (Richard Gaines Jr.)
Subject: Re: LOVING: Jack's parentage
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 01:42:15 GMT


In article <Jul.27.18.34.02.1992.17006@andromeda.rutgers.edu>, giordano@andromeda.rutgers.edu (E. Giordano) writes:

All you long time Loving fans who was/is Jack's
parents and how is he an Alden?

Jack's natural parents are Dane Hammond and some lady who if I remember
correctly was a friend of Ann Alden's.  Ann and her husband Roger Forbes
adopted Jack as a baby.

Years later when Dane brought Shana to town Jack found out that Dane was his
father and he ended up sleeping with Ava.

Richard


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: wulfekuh@cps.msu.edu.cps.msu.edu (Marilyn R Wulfekuhler)
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN-Is anyone reading?
Originator: wulfekuh@starfish.cps.msu.edu
Reply-To: wulfekuh@cps.msu.edu.cps.msu.edu (Marilyn R Wulfekuhler)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Michigan State University
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 18:08:36 GMT

(I tried to send this by mail, but your mailer either truncates your
header or our mailer doesn't know your site)

In article <1992Jul23.130936.1972@brandonu.ca> pitzel@brandonu.ca writes:
>I don't mean to whine, but I am quite upset that people apparently do not take
>the time to read other people's posts lately. 

You shouldn't assume that people are not reading posts before blindly
going ahead with their own.  Remember that not everyone is on the
internet (very fast turnaround time).  Some people's newsfeeds may take 
a day or two to receive postings that you have already seen.

That said (I always like to give people the benefit of the doubt) ...

FLAME SUIT ON
However, it does seem that this newsgroup is at times just a
leetle bit cliquish in that people seem to respond more to the 
well known frequent posters than us ordinary folks, regardless of 
where the subject first came up.
FLAME SUIT OFF

Maybe that's just my imagination though.

Marilyn
wulfekuh@cps.msu.edu
From: sallyg@oregon.uoregon.edu (George, Sally)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Hi Everybody
Date: 31 Jul 92 16:39:15 GMT
Organization: University of Oregon

In article <1992Jul30.202649.19356@pixel.kodak.com> fbrown@ssd.kodak.com (Frank Brown) writes:

>>
>Hello everyone
>  I have posted a few times but I haven't introduced myself so here
>goes. My name is Frank Brown and I live in Marion, N.Y. and I'm a
>sys admin at Kodak in Rochester. I'm married and have a stepdaughter.
>We raise AKC Labs and have a small tabby cat too. I have been watching
>AMC since the early 70's and wish they would not drag things out so
>long. Nat in the well, who killed Zack Grayson, now it will be how
>can Edmund prove who he is. My current fav characters our Brooke, Liv,
>Lucas, and Dixie. Well it is almost time to go home and rewind the
>vcr so bye for now.

>Frank


Welcome, Frank

Sal
From: RMDELC01@ULKYVM.LOUISVILLE.EDU ("588-0803")
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL: TAN: Post-a-matic supreme?
Date: 30 Jul 92 12:34:04 GMT


Okay JoJo, I think you've got big competition for the
title here, if we're counting non-DOOL-ers.  I just saw
30, count 'em, 30 posts in a row from some dude named
Stsve Harding regarding ATWT.  Yup, 30.  And those were
just the ones all in a row, that doesn't include those
scattered around.  Now I remember at one point the lemon-
scented one hit us with 17 in a row, but 30?  Man, that is
just above and beyond the call, you know?  Oh, and they
all had different subject lines, so he didn't accidentally
post the same thing repeatedly.  I think this guy deserves
an award or something!

An Amazed Guavita

PS  Timmy, wait till I get home...try and drag Nick into
this.  Okay buddy, this means war!
:-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)
From: jeanie@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (jean.c.ward)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: ATTN: AMC WRITERS!!!!!!
Date: 23 Jul 92 22:26:52 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <9207231643.AA02647@hqsun1.us.oracle.com> tech@us.oracle.com (tech, tchin) writes:
>
>
>
>NO...NO...NO...BAD WRITERS!!!!!!
>
>LEAVE Livia and Tom alone....I am so TIRED of seeing a couple finally find
>love and happiness....then throw in a hand grenade to liven it up.....

ABSOLUTELY!  I knew they were going to do this and I'm tired of Tom never
having anything go right for him.  Granted, Livia and Lucas have a child
together, but Livia's supposed to be a smart woman.  After what Lucas did
she's gonna trust him.  I want to see Tom get mad, and I don't mean the
little boy look mad.  I mean really mad.  I want to see him fight for
something instead of whimp away.  He's the one that encouraged Livia to
give Lucas a chance with Terrance and now Lucas is stepping inbetween
him and Livia?  I think I'd be P.O'd enough to show a little temper anyhow.
I think I liked him better when he drank....isn't that terrible.  I'm
sorry, I've watched the show for a long time and I always liked Tom but
geez, they haven't given him anything good since the barbell scene.
>
>Livia has finally found love after all those years...and Tom finally found
>a woman with a child that is practically grown up....Let St. Tom find the
>SINcere relationship we all hoped he would.....
>
>Yes...lucas  is cute...but give him Natalie or Dixie....or create a story
>line where An Li falls in love with Lucas and has a moment of weakness....
>throw the hand grenade into a Lucas/Anli/Terrance storyline....
>
Or Mariane Colby (Was that her name). Architect - Real Estate, they go together.
Besides, she'd give Vivian a good dose of the nose in the air.

>JUST LEAVE TOM AND LIVIA alone.....
>
Yes, I agree.

>Thanks....Tia "Sick and Tired and Tired and Sick of not seeing a relationship
>last past a few months"
>
>**Please note the comment above where I mentioned Natalie...I realize she is
>  married...I was too busy ranting and raving and lost temporary soap memory**
>

Jeanie
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps