HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: omitchel@jarthur.claremont.edu (Ocie *crow* Mitchell)
Subject: Re: How to say that ?
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Distribution: inet
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 22:55:01 GMT

In article <9208270743.AA10840@tlpel3.frec.bull.fr> M.Kossa@frec.bull.fr (Marc Kossa) writes:
>Saluton !
>Mi estas nov al Esperanto, mi havas ("a little question" = ?) pri
>("pronunciation" = ?). Kiel oni diras "auxto" ?
>Kiel estas la diferencon fonetikon inter "auxto" kaj "auto" ?
>Bonvole, respondas en anglo !
>Dankon.
>
>-- 
>
>          /| /|             |  /                        
>         / |/ |  _  ._   _  |_/  _ < <   _              
>        /     |_(_(_/ |_(_  | \_(_)_>_>_(_(_      $B9,:n!!??5W(J
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>| Bull SA, BP 208        | E-mail    : M.Kossa@frec.bull.fr          |
>| 1 Rue de Provence      | Phone (W) : 33 76397500 ext 7421          |
>| 38432 Echirolles CEDEX |       (H) : Are you kidding ?             |
>| FRANCE                 | Office    : FREC B1-163                   |
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>"Soyez sage les enfants"                        - Robocop in "Robocop"

The diference between auxto and auto is that the aux is "clumped together" as
in cOW, nOW etc. but since u is a vowel and ux is not, au is two seperate
sylabales ah-oo (I've never come across this in an english word, so no
examples come to mind)
Gxis, Ocie

----------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
``What do you think sirs?''  -Joel (mst3k)    | do not write above this line
----------------------------------------------+------------------------------- 
   __             _ _ _                       | Ocie Mitchell
  / ')           ' ) ) )  _/_    /      /) /) | omitchel@jarthur.claremont.edu
 /  / _. o _      / / / o /  _. /_  _  // //  | Q:is that your real name? 
(__/ (__(_(<_    / ' (_(_(__(__/ /_(<_(/_(/_  | A:yes, it is my real name.
----------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
From: DWOLFF@RES-C4.PRIME.COM (David Wolff)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Re: anonima pos^to
Date: 31 Aug 92 17:51:00 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet

> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 15:24:03 PDT
> Message-Id: <9208282224.AA13546@efi.com>
> From: .@efi.com
> Sender: .@efi.com
> Path: .
> Originator: .
> To: esperanto@rand.org
> Subject: Re:
>
((afis^o ellasita))
>
> 						leganto

S^ajnas al mi, ke tiu persono tiel hontas pri siaj opinioj, ke tiu
intence kas^ig^as.

Al "leganto," mi diras, ke anonima afis^o estas malg^entila.  Se vi
volas paroli publike, trovu la kurag^on uzi vian nomon.

David Wolff

dwolff@RES-C4.Prime.COM

Disclaimer:  Reflecting Prime policy is a non-goal of this posting.
FreeAdvert:  Esperanto, the international language *that works*:
             Call (800) 828-5944 for free info package (US or Canada)
WittyQuote:  Witty but very long saying condensed into a microdot: "."
KiboFodder:  arak Kibo rivo
From: Ulf.Lunde@kvatro.no (Ulf Lunde)
Subject: Re: How to say that ?
Organization: Kvatro A/S, Trondheim, Norway
	<1992Aug27.225501.21696@muddcs.claremont.edu>
Distribution: inet
Date: 28 Aug 92 17:24:22

>>>>> On 27 Aug 92 22:55:01 GMT, omitchel@jarthur.claremont.edu (Ocie *crow* Mitchell) said:
> 
> The diference between auxto and auto is that the aux is "clumped together" as
> in cOW, nOW etc. but since u is a vowel and ux is not, au is two seperate
> sylabales ah-oo 

Because 'ux' is not a vowel, both letters in "aux" are part of the same syl-
lable.  This affects not only the way you pronounce the "aux" (see above),
but also affects the position of the accent when you pronounce the word which
the "au" or "aux" is a part of.  (See grammar rule no. 10.)

Ulf
From: reinhard.foessmeier@munich.ixos.de (Reinhard Foessmeier)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Peto pri Esperanto-instruado ekperimentoj
Date: 4 Sep 92 06:55:03 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
X-Unparsable-Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 8:31:06 MET DST

dgary@ecsgate.uucp  (D Gary Grady) demandis:

> 
> Mi konas instruiston kiu volus enkonduki Esperanton en sia lernejo
> (gimnazio por studantoj 15-18 jaragxaj) venontjare, sed por konvinki la
> lernejan estraron pri la utileco de Esperanto-instruado, li bezonas
> informon pri eksperimentoj montrantaj, (1e) ke Esperanto efektive estas
> multe pli rapide lernebla ol aliaj lingvoj, almenaux por
> angloparolantoj, kaj (2e) ke gxi estas bona bazo por plua lingvostudo.
> 
> Mi ie havas paperon pri eksperimento cxe Columbia University, sed mi
> auxdis pri multe aliaj.  Cxu iu havas liston de tiaj eksperimentoj?  Se
> jes, bonvolu aux enretigu gxin aux sendu gxin al mi, mi petas!  Mi
> transdonos gxin al la instruisto.
> 

Mi scias pri du raportoj pri euxropa lerneja eskperimento, kiu
okazis en la jaroj 70+ en pluraj euxropaj landoj. Unu estas libro
"Esperanto, lerneja eksperimento", de H. Sonnabend, aperinta cxe
"Edistudio" en Pisa, Italujo. La alia estas statistika analizo de tiu
eksperimento kaj trovigxas en la libro "Einfuehrung in die Interlinguistik
/ Enkonduko en la interlingvistikon", kompilita de T. Carlevaro.
La artikolo estas en Esperanto, kun germana resumo.

Bedauxrinde, inter la landoj en tiu eksperimento NE estis iu
anglalingva lando.

Reinhard Foessmeier
From: lendonc@cognos.com (Cleve Lendon 3821)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Interlingua
Date: 27 Aug 92 19:42:11 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet

>	I certainly had no idea that my comments on Interlinuga (esp. vis a vis
>Esperanto) would generate as much discussion as it did, but I have to
>say that I am even more surprised at the somewhat emotional (hostile
>would be a bit too much) reaction on the part of some Esperantists.  At
>times it almost appeared a case of "the samideano doth protest too
>much."

I don't think the adjective "hostile" would be too much. When you tell people
what's wrong with them, they often react with hostility.

This doesn't mean that people shouldn't be told what's wrong with them, just 
that you should expect hostility when you do.

>If Esperanto is to survive and prosper, movado or no, serious changes need
>to be made in both the way its used and, with all due respect, in the
>way Esperantists present themselves to others.  

With all due respect Paul, I don't think we've got a problem.

>		Paul Denisowski

Klivo
From: 72627.2647@compuserve.com (Don HARLOW)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Re: HARLOW? HARLOW?
Date: 4 Sep 92 04:50:22 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet

To: Esperanto >INTERNET:esperanto@rand.org

Dato: 920903

Response to George F. McQuary (gee, the Challenger Drive 
neighborhood has certainly gone downhill recently!):

(1) As you will note by looking at a few of the other signatures 
around here, writing one's family name in FULL CAPS is not 
uncommon among Esperantists; this is because (_pace_ many 
Americans, who don't know better) it is not always clear where 
the FAMILY NAME goes in the full name ("Welcome aboard, 
Ensign Laren!" "It's _Ensign Ro_, Commander Riker; my family 
name comes first!" From "Star Trek: The Next Generation", 
episode titled "Ro Laren"). This is the situation in large parts of 
Asia and Africa, some parts of Europe, and even as close to home 
as Mexico (and Oakland). Sorry, you will have to continue seeing 
Don HARLOW spell his family name in CAPS (not to mention 
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS, HOTTA Hirohiko, and others).

(2) Sorry for the extra spacing. Someday I must fork over an extra 
$1000 for a machine that is less versatile than the one I'm using, 
doesn't have a WYSIWYG screen, and doesn't use proportional 
fonts, so that these little problems don't crop up.

>Like we really care about 1935                  5 pts

(3) And one hundred big stoopid-meter points for failing to 
remember Santayana's famous dictum. (Did you watch the 
Republican national convention? I did. Bernhard Rust was out 
in force. I think he even chaired the Platform Committee. 
Sinclair Lewis had a title which he dedicated to people who 
didn't really care about 1935 -- even then.)

=============================================
Don HARLOW                                Redaktoro Esperanto U.S.A.
tel. (1 510) 222 0187
CompuServe [72627,2647]
Internet 72627.2647@compuserve.com

"The support of artificial auxiliary languages such as Esperanto 
has no place in the national socialist state. Their use leads to 
a weakening of the essential values of national characteristics. 
This is why all promotion of the teaching of such languages 
should be avoided and classrooms should not be made available 
for teaching them."
                               Decree of the National and 
                               Prussian Minister for Science, 
                               Training and People's Edu-
                                cation Bernhard Rust, May 
                                17, 1935, The Third Reich
(By their enemies ye shall know them.)
=============================================
From: pcj1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Pierre Jelenc)
Subject: Re: [movado] UEA membership rates! (was about gifts)
Reply-To: pcj1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Pierre Jelenc)
Organization: Columbia University
Distribution: inet
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 17:11:30 GMT

In article <9208250726.AA24804@evs2.uia.ac.be> slootman@EVS2.UIA.AC.BE (Wim Slootmans) writes:

>Serious now.  Does anyone have any idea, why U.S.-citizens should pay
>less?  Is it because ELNA isn't that big relatively to the countries
>dimensions, or is it just coincidence since the U.S.-dollar is
>devaluating again last days?
>

Lau` la hodiau`a kurzo:

Nederlando:              88 guldenoj
Usono:      45 dolaroj = 73,5  "
Japanio:  6600 enoj    = 86,5  "
Svedio:    290 kronoj  = 89,5  "
Britio:     25 pundoj  = 81,5  "
malric^aj
landoj:                  48    " 

Tiuj estas la jaraj plenaj kotizoj por 1992 lau` la jarlibro de UEA.

La dolaro estas malforta je proksimume 20% kompare kun lasta jaro, kiam
la kotizoj estis kalkulitaj.

Pierre


Pierre Jelenc                        pcj1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu 
                                    Columbia University, New York
From: dfkihueg@RZ.UNI-SB.DE ("Edmund Grimley-Evans")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Flugteleroj
Date: 3 Sep 92 08:18:38 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet

> P.S. Kiel oni dirus "Frisbee" per Esperanto?  Cxu flugdisko?

En LA KANCERKLINIKO 60, sur pa^go 8, oni povas trovi la vorton
"flugtelero". ^Car la koncerna artikolo ("Kompatu! Kompatu!" de Maurice
MERGER) estas en bonega Esperanto (male al multaj aferoj en la sama
revuo), mi emas sekvi tiun uzon.

Edmund
From: .@efi.com
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Re:
Date: 28 Aug 92 22:24:03 GMT
Reply-To: soc-culture-esperanto@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet


     Vidu, ke pli ol duono da homoj en Usono konsentas, doni
kontrau'-bebhavigan aj^on al lernejano.  Sed, se evito estas
pli bona ol kuraco, tio povas ne okazi.  La evito estas eduko,
kaj dono estas nur kuraco.  Nepre, iuj pensas, ke dono ja estas
evito, kaj kuraco estas fin-bebhavigo.  Sed la vera eduko estas
eduko, kaj malkurag^igi tro intimaj rilatoj.

						leganto

Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
From: ederveen@research.ptt.nl (Ederveen D.)
Subject: Re: Bundle messages...
Reply-To: D.N.M.Ederveen@research.ptt.nl
Organization: PTT Research
Distribution: inet
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 09:33:21 GMT

ryon@support.avalanche.com (Ryon Brame) writes:
>	Currently I subscribe to three mailing lists, including "esperanto"
>and "Conlang".  The third uses a neat remailer that will bundle messages
>and send them out as one message with a header with the subject lines from
>each message.

>	It's so nice to receive 5 messages instead of 50.  Each Monday, I
>return to work and have over a 100 messages waiting for me and I would like
>to propose that we use a similar remailer.  I've contacted the adminstrator 
>of my third list and he has agreed to provide the source code to anyone who 
>is interested.

I don't think it is very practical for the Esperanto-lists, because
contributions from the usenet-group soc.culture.esperanto, the
internet-mailing list esperanto@rand.org and the bitnet/earn list
esper-l@trearn are interchanged in a rather complex manner. 

I suppose you subscribe to esperanto@rand.org? I don't think it is
practical to send bundles to subscribers, and separate messages to usenet
and bitnet. If you like 'digest' mailing list, you should try the
usenet-group; it's even better than a digest/bundle.
--
Derk Ederveen                                             tel. +31-70-3323202
D.N.M.Ederveen@research.ptt.nl / ederveen@hlsdnl5.bitnet  fax. +31-70-3326477
  ** "I wish I was a warrior, in every language that I speak" - Lou Reed **
From: 72627.2647@compuserve.com (Don HARLOW)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Re: Uropi
Date: 2 Sep 92 05:01:54 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet

To: Roger Hare >INTERNET:ercn72@festival.edinburgh.ac.uk;
Esperanto >INTERNET:esperanto@rand.org

Dato: 920901

>This is probably the wrong place to post a query such as this, but here goes.
>A couple of years ago, I came a cross a reference to a new (?) artificial
>language called Uropi. I cannot find any information about this language
>anywhere (maybe I came across the reference on April 1!). Does any subscriber
>to this group know anything about Uropi, or is it a figment of my diseased
>mind?

I believe there was an article about Uropi in The Economist some 
years back, but that's the only place I've ever heard of it. If I remember 
correctly, it was invented by a young teacher in France. It's definitely 
not an imaginary language or "false memory."

There are all sorts of artificial languages that reach the stage of having 
been "invented" -- i.e., somebody sketches a grammar for them, invents 
a minimal vocabulary, and then calls the newspapers. If it's in the 
so-called "silly season" (an American media term for the summer 
doldrums, when nothing interesting seems to be happening), they'll 
often get some publicity. I don't think Uropi ever reached the stage of 
having anyone, including the inventor, speak it.

>PS: I do also have an interest in Esperanto..

That's wise.

=============================================
Don HARLOW                                Redaktoro Esperanto U.S.A.
tel. (1 510) 222 0187
CompuServe [72627,2647]
Internet 72627.2647@compuserve.com

"The support of artificial auxiliary languages such as Esperanto 
has no place in the national socialist state. Their use leads to 
a weakening of the essential values of national characteristics. 
This is why all promotion of the teaching of such languages 
should be avoided and classrooms should not be made available 
for teaching them."
                                                          Decree of the National
and 
                                                          Prussian Minister for
Science, 
                                                          Training and People's
Edu-
                                                           cation Bernhard Rust,
May 
                                                           17, 1935, The Third
eeich
(By their enemies ye shall know them.)
=============================================
From: ercn72@festival.ed.ac.uk (R.J.Hare)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Re: La Lingva Servo (monata posxtajxo / monthly posting)
Date: 2 Sep 92 14:33:12 GMT
Distribution: inet

I have some reasons for thinking my mail may not be getting through to you.
Accordingly please send the first lesson (English) to me at the address below.

Thanks.

Roger Hare.
r.j.hare@ed.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
From: chungdan@leland.Stanford.EDU (Zhong Qi Iao (Daniel))
Subject: [komun-diraj^o] ne, dankon
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: inet
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 92 03:40:03 GMT


     Iu afis^is pri: "Ne dankon."  Sed, ne estas, ke iu donas "ne dankon".
Estas, ke: "Ne, dankon."  Tio signifas: "Ne estas necese; dankon al ci."
C^u ne?

					*Zhong* Qi-Iao
 ||| \ /  /       /   |  \/   |  / / /  
 |+|  X  /       <    |       |  \/     
 --- / \ ---      \   |       |  --|
From: KNAPPEN@VKPMZD.KPH.UNI-MAINZ.DE (J%org Knappen)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Re: Bundle messages...
Date: 26 Aug 92 11:28:39 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
X-Unparsable-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 13:01 GMT +0100

No... I prefer separate messages with appropriate subject lines.

--JK.
From: 72627.2647@compuserve.com (Don HARLOW)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Re: ^serco
Date: 24 Aug 92 01:35:33 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet

To: Esperanto >INTERNET:esperanto@rand.org

Dato: 920823

La sxerco raportita de Wim Slootmans meritas tradukon 
ankaux en Esperanton:

D: Kiel epitetigxas homo, kiu parolas tri lingvojn?
R: Trilingva.

D: Kiel epitetigxas homo, kiu parolas du lingvojn?
R: Dulingva.

D: Kiel epitetigxas homo, kiu parolas unu lingvon?
R: Usonano.

Mi unue renkontis tiun sxercon en la 1980-libro "The Tongue-
Tied American" (Usonanoj neparolpovaj) de usona Senatano 
Paul Simon. Kun bedauxro mi devas raporti, ke intertempe 
sxangxigxis ... preskaux neniom.

=============================================
Don HARLOW                                Redaktoro Esperanto U.S.A.
tel. (1 510) 222 0187
CompuServe [72627,2647]
Internet 72627.2647@compuserve.com

"To discipline Esperantists is to eat soup with chopsticks."
                                                          Confucius
=============================================
From: padeniso@eos.ncsu.edu (PAUL ANDREW DENISOWSKI)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Re: Interlingua
Date: 26 Aug 92 15:54:23 GMT
Reply-To: padeniso@eos.ncsu.edu (PAUL ANDREW DENISOWSKI)
Distribution: inet
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Originator: padeniso@c00015-118dan.eos.ncsu.edu




	I certainly had no idea that my comments on Interlinuga (esp. vis a vis
Esperanto) would generate as much discussion as it did, but I have to
say that I am even more surprised at the somewhat emotional (hostile
would be a bit too much) reaction on the part of some Esperantists.  At
times it almost appeared a case of "the samideano doth protest too
much."

	Don Harlow's comments about the ELNA convention are well-taken, esp.
concerning the issue of certain prominent members of the Esperanto
community who had not recalled meeting me (although I did take part in
several meetins and skits).  At the risk of making a somewhat pointed
observation, I felt that more could have been done to bring newcomers
"into the fold", so to speak, rather than have the conference dominated by
"old-timers".

	I would like to say unequivocally that I think an international
language would be a very good idea, and that Esperanto has no small
measure of promise in this respect.  On the other hand, I think the
slightly ... well, even hostile reactions of some readers is precisely
the kind of mentality that keeps Esperanto from flourishing.  Instead of
gleefully trying to attack excerpts from my post, some readers might be
better advised to examine what could be done in a PRACTICAL, REAL way to
help Esperanto.  Ideology and even irrefutable logic are EXTREMELY poor
motivators, esp. when it comes to something like foreign languages in a
country reknown for its monolinguism.

	It would seem that Zamenhof's instistance on the "netusebleco" of
Esperanto has extended into the mentality of some of its adherents.  If
Esperanto is to survive and prosper, movado or no, serious changes need
to be made in both the way its used and, with all due respect, in the
way Esperantists present themselves to others.  

	It would please me greatly to see 100 million speakers of Esperanto.  I
would hope that constructive criticism is not wholly unwelcome in
Esperantujo.

		Paul Denisowski
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
From: brewer@sol.cs.wmich.edu (Steve Brewer)
Subject: La Vojo
Organization: W M U Centro de Scienca Edukado
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 20:51:19 GMT

S-ro Michael Urban <urban@sideshow.jpl.nasa.gov> skribas:

[multajn bonajn aferojn fortan^citajn] 

] So perhaps it is best that we continue
] in the tradition of Zamenhof's `gutoj malgrandaj', the small drops
] that we hope will eventually wear away that granite mountain.

For those who may not be familiar with this reference, I happen to
have it on line.  Any typos are mine, etc.

	La Vojo
	L.L. Zamenhof
	
	Tra densa mallumo, briletas la celo
	al kiu kurage ni iras.
	Simile al stelo, en nokta ^cielo,
	al ni la direkton ^gi diras.
	Kaj nin ne timigas la noktaj fantomoj,
		nek batoj del sortoj,
		nek mokoj del homoj,
	^Car klara, kaj rekta, kaj tre difinita,
	^gi estas la voj' elektita.
	
	Nur rekte, kura^ge, kaj ne flanki^gante,
	ni iru la vojon celitan.
	E^c guto malgranda konstante frapante,
	traboras la monton granitan.
		L' espero, l'obstino,
		kaj la pacienco,
	jen estas la signo per kies potenco
	ni, pa^so post pa^so, post longa laboro,
	atingos la celon en gloro.
	
	Ni semas kaj semas, neniam laci^gas
	pri l' tempoj estontoj pensante.
	Cent semoj perdi^gas, mil semoj perdi^gas,
	ni semas kaj semas konstante.
		Ho ^cesu, mokante
		la homoj admonas,
	Ne ^cesu, ne cesu!  En kor' al ni sonas.
	Obstine anta^uen, la nepoj vin benos,
	se vi pacience eltenos.
	
	Se longa sekeco, a^u ventoj subitaj,
	velkantajn foliojn de^siras,
	ni dankas la venton, kaj repurigitaj,
	ni forton pli fre^san akiras.
		Ne mortos jam nia
		bravega anaro.
	^Gin jam ne timigos la vento, nek staro.
	Obstine ^gi pa^sas, provita, hardita
	al cel' unufoje signita.

-- 
Steven 'Fervorulo' Brewer    brewer@cs.wmich.edu * 99brewer@lab.cc.wmich.edu
                  Center for Science Education,  Western Michigan University
La fundamento de nia lingvo devas resti por ^ciam netu^sebla.  L.L. Zamenhof
From: 72627.2647@compuserve.com (Don HARLOW)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: Re: mia / la mia
Date: 24 Aug 92 01:34:47 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet

To: Esperanto >INTERNET:esperanto@rand.org

Dato: 9208

Christer Kiselman, pri vortordo:

>Tamen la vortordo influas la signifon. Ekzemple "granda festo katolika"
>kaj "katolika festo granda" ne estas samsignifaj. Same pri
>"usona aviadilo rapida" kaj "rapida aviadilo usona". Ke la vortordo
>estas 'libera' (iom stranga termino) signifas ke pluraj ordoj estas
>eblaj, permesitaj, ne ke ili ^ciuj havas la saman signifon.

Cxu, do? Por mi, ili havas tute saman signifon! Jen "festo, kiu 
estas granda kaj katolika", jen "aviadilo, kiu estas usona kaj rapida".

=============================================
Don HARLOW                                Redaktoro Esperanto U.S.A.
tel. (1 510) 222 0187
CompuServe [72627,2647]
Internet 72627.2647@compuserve.com

"To discipline Esperantists is to eat soup with chopsticks."
                                                          Confucius
=============================================
From: M.Kossa@frec.bull.fr (Marc Kossa)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto
Subject: How to say that ?
Date: 27 Aug 92 10:07:23 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet

Saluton !
Mi estas nov al Esperanto, mi havas ("a little question" = ?) pri
("pronunciation" = ?). Kiel oni diras "auxto" ?
Kiel estas la diferencon fonetikon inter "auxto" kaj "auto" ?
Bonvole, respondas en anglo !
Dankon.
-- 
          /| /|             |  /                        
         / |/ |  _  ._   _  |_/  _ < <   _              
        /     |_(_(_/ |_(_  | \_(_)_>_>_(_(_      $B9,:n!!??5W(J
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bull SA, BP 208        | E-mail    : M.Kossa@frec.bull.fr          |
| 1 Rue de Provence      | Phone (W) : 33 76397500 ext 7421          |
| 38432 Echirolles CEDEX |       (H) : Are you kidding ?             |
| FRANCE                 | Office    : FREC B1-163                   |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
"Soyez sage les enfants"                        - Robocop in "Robocop"
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto