HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dlhpfm!dlh@NCoast.org (daniel lance herrick)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: WAF165
Keywords: Waffle
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 21:58:22 EDT
Organization: dlh Performance Marketing

eoin@xocolatl.com (John F. Snyder) writes:

> dlhpfm!dlh@NCoast.org (daniel lance herrick) writes:
> 
> -> Below are my config.sys and autoexec.bat files because you asked for
> -> them, and my static file because I think the fix is more likely to lie
> -> there.
> 
> -> 
> -> ------------------------static below----------------------------------
> 
> -> buflines     : 30000
>                   ^^^^^
> 
> Make this something reasonable, like 300, at most 1000.

Thanks to Bill Fenner who told me to check this before I posted the
configuration files and to several people, including John Snyder, who
read through my mess and pointed out exactly what I had done to myself.

(I have been very annoyed when Waffle was so impudent as to tell me
that an article was too long to follow-up.  When I was scanning static
for the upgrade I saw this line (with the number 256) and thought,
"Aha! there's the culprit!" and fixed it so it would not be in the way
again, or so I thought.)

Again, thanks.

dan  of dlh Performance Marketing  POBox 1419  Mentor Ohio 44061
         NCoast.org!dlhpfm!dlh or ab.com!dlhpfm.uucp!dlh
From: john@cacti.mcws.fidonet.org (John Coffman)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Waffle hangs my machine.  Why?
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 92 09:10:51 PDT
Organization: Coffman Cactus, Tujunga CA

When getting my news feed from upstream, I get the following message and
then my computer is hung up until I reboot it.

receiving "D.mcws8468" as "mcws/08468.D"
NOTE - existing D.mcws8468 file saved to C:/spool/lost/08468.d

I'm running ver 1.65.  The only way to get my feed going again is to
have my upstream node delete the file in question.  Then the news
gets flowing again.

This is a very annoying problem.  What's going on?

John Coffman * Coffman Cactus  * (818) 353-4011  
HM: john@cacti.mcws.fidonet.org   WK: audit038@spacm1.spac.spc.com
From: julie%erix@uunet.uu.net (Julie Cafritz)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Yank
Keywords: editor yank
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 22:59:55 EDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Erix Remote

The waffle docs refer to a "yank" command that supposedly
enables any file to be yanked into the internal editor under
waffle.  Can anyone explain how to get this to work, when
composing a mail message or a news post, for example?
From: mvdl@et.tudelft.nl
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Waf1.64-XT-HST/DS- only getting 350cps
Date: 3 Sep 92 01:02:56 +0200
Organization: TU-Delft, dpt of Electrical Engineering

In article <TZogqB1w164w@fangio.wa.com>, raoul@fangio.wa.com (Jeff Benedict) writes:
> Hello, netters-
> 
> I'm running a small site in Port Townsend, WA. USA.  My hardware is
> minimal- XT, 40 meg Rodime SCSI drive, HST/DS.  I'm using Waffle 1.64,
> BNU driver, 2K send/receive buffers, locked at 19.2K.  
> 
> When I connect with my newsfeed, (nwnexus), I'm only getting 300-350 cps 
> max.  NWNexus has WorldBlazers and I connect at 14.4K. NWNexus is overloaded 
> and is in the process of upgrading (Thanks, ED!) but I also only get 300-350 
> when doing a UUCP transfer with halcyon.remote, which is using a T-2500.
> 
> Others are getting 700-1000+ connecting with both halcyon.remote and 
> NWNexus.
> 
> I've tried a variety of times of day to connect to NWNexus so that it is not 
> overloaded and it just makes no difference.
> 
> My questions:
> 
> 1. What kinds of speeds are others using similar configurations getting?

I cannot answer this... Our configurations do not match, nor are our feeds the
same...

> 
> 2. If you run a similar system and are getting faster speeds, what are ypur 
> settings?

Not a similar system, but we've experienced at our feed that we should disable
datacompression and software flowcontrol in order to obtain a 'high' throughput
(this was with a 14k4)

> 
> 3. Is the XT and the slow Rodime drive the limiting factor here?

I'ts definitely a cause.. I beleive a XT cannot really handle speeds over 9600
baud... (CPS at a maximunm of about 1000CPS).. With higher speeds there will be 
alot of modem-to-computer flow-control, which eventually leads to
modem-to-modem flowcontrol (as soon as your modes buffer is full).. I did not
really study the g-protocol, but I suspect it to be a very protcol that
uses alot of CPUload... I do not quite know whether this is true or bullshit,
but
our deduction has lead to this (carefull) conclusion...

Using a At 286 will improve your throughput... also te use of a 16550A UART
will do good to this.. (it has a FIFO buffer).. Play around with things as
flow-control, compression, errorcorrection of your modem... Check other
modem-settings like rts/cts delay etc...
> 
> If you feel this is important enough info for general consumption, reply on 
> the net.  If you would prefer to e-mail me, I'll summarize responses for the 
> net.
> 
> Thank you all for you help,
> 
> Jeff
> 
>   -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> | Jeffrey E. Benedict | J. Benedict Computing | "When the going gets weird, |
> | raoul@fangio.wa.com | Box 277, Chimacum, WA.|  the weird turn pro......." |
> | raoul@halcyon.com   |  98325 (206)385-5819  |            -Dr. Raoul Duke  |
>   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dlhpfm!dlh@NCoast.org (daniel lance herrick)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: WAF165
Keywords: Waffle
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 23:18:12 EDT
Organization: dlh Performance Marketing

frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca (Steve Frampton) writes:

> dlhpfm!dlh@NCoast.org (daniel lance herrick) writes:
> 
> > buflines     : 30000
> 
> Call me crazy, but you want to allow your users to enter up to 30000 
> lines of text?!?  No *wonder* you don't have enough memory!  At 72 

No, but I, essentially the only user of this system, want to be
permitted to feed any article that has aroused me enough to respond to
it into brief to hack it down to size and respond to the parts I want
to respond to.

That "this article is too large to follow up" message is entirely
unnecessary when the article is to be fed to an external editor.

dan  of dlh Performance Marketing  POBox 1419  Mentor Ohio 44061
         NCoast.org!dlhpfm!dlh or ab.com!dlhpfm.uucp!dlh
From: boutcher@torag.guild.org (Dave Boutcher)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Mail-checker for Waffle 1.65
Date: 30 Aug 92 01:08:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: torag.1992Aug30.010835.24469
Followup-To: boutcher@canuck.guild.orgg
Organization: Torag Public Access Unix, Toronto

I run a small local system with only a few users.  Under Waffle 1.64 I
made a short program (called CHKMAIL) to print a list of users with unread
mail.  I would run this program after polling (and at startup time) so that
people using the system could tell if they had mail.

The program just looked at the "mail" field of the password file, and compared
it to the number of "user.x" mail files in the user's directory.

I am about to breath a heavy sigh and start to try and do the same thing with
the new 1.65 password file and single mail file.  I wonder if anyone out ther
has any ideas.

Thanks!!!!!

Dave Boutcher  - boutcher@canuck.guild.org, boutcher@vnet.ibm.com
               - (416) 428-6722             (416) 448-3783
From: Ralph Sims <ralphs@remote.halcyon.com>
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: 115200 Modem speed
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 08:32:07 PDT
Organization: Halcyon's Remote

bdl@cruiser.uucp (Bob Lombard) writes:

>   I'm trying to get waffle 1.64 to run with my telebit Worldblazer
> at 115200 bps.  I'm using BNU170, locked @ 115200.  My question is,
> what do it put in the speed: & locked: fields in waffle/system/static ?
> anything i tried just gave me an '..unsupported..' message.

>   I'm currently running @ 38400 w/o problems.

Either use 38400 or get WAF165.  The latter is preferred.
From: raoul@fangio.wa.com (Jeff Benedict)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Waf1.64-XT-HST/DS- only getting 350cps
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 23:53:28 PDT
Organization: J. Benedict Computing, Port Townsend, WA.

Hello, netters-

I'm running a small site in Port Townsend, WA. USA.  My hardware is
minimal- XT, 40 meg Rodime SCSI drive, HST/DS.  I'm using Waffle 1.64,
BNU driver, 2K send/receive buffers, locked at 19.2K.  

When I connect with my newsfeed, (nwnexus), I'm only getting 300-350 cps 
max.  NWNexus has WorldBlazers and I connect at 14.4K. NWNexus is overloaded 
and is in the process of upgrading (Thanks, ED!) but I also only get 300-350 
when doing a UUCP transfer with halcyon.remote, which is using a T-2500.

Others are getting 700-1000+ connecting with both halcyon.remote and 
NWNexus.

I've tried a variety of times of day to connect to NWNexus so that it is not 
overloaded and it just makes no difference.

My questions:

1. What kinds of speeds are others using similar configurations getting?

2. If you run a similar system and are getting faster speeds, what are ypur 
settings?

3. Is the XT and the slow Rodime drive the limiting factor here?

If you feel this is important enough info for general consumption, reply on 
the net.  If you would prefer to e-mail me, I'll summarize responses for the 
net.

Thank you all for you help,

Jeff

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
| Jeffrey E. Benedict | J. Benedict Computing | "When the going gets weird, |
| raoul@fangio.wa.com | Box 277, Chimacum, WA.|  the weird turn pro......." |
| raoul@halcyon.com   |  98325 (206)385-5819  |            -Dr. Raoul Duke  |
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
From: fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner)
Subject: Re: TRUNCATED BATCH(es)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 22:18:52 GMT

In article <oZPwPB3w165w@ruth.UUCP> rat@ruth.UUCP (David Douthitt) writes:
|dawson@willard.UUCP writes:
|
|| rat@ruth.UUCP (David Douthitt) writes:
|
|| > I was getting the same messages during my testing of my Fidonet-Usenet
|| > gateway.  After generating messages to port, rnews complained about truncat
|| > batch, and also "echoed" the last read data from the file again.
|| > 
|| > After some investigation, I determined that the problem was that I was
|| > generating files with CRLF pairs instead of the UNIX-style LF terminators.
|| > After fixing my software to generate LFs, this problem went away.

Er, this just occurred to me -- Did you count the CR/LF pair as 2 bytes in
your #! rnews line, or not?  If not, then this was your bug, not Waffle's.

  Bill
-- 
Bill Fenner	fenner@cs.psu.edu	..psuvax1!hogbbs!wcfpc!wcf
		wcf@hogbbs.scol.pa.us   (+1 814 238-9633 v.32bis)
From: mike@batpad.lgb.ca.us (mike batchelor)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Status Bar
Date: 25 Aug 92 01:46:38 GMT
Organization: The Batchelor Pad

fenner@cmf.nrl.navy.mil (William C Fenner) writes:
>
> In article <Ju3RPB3w165w@eternal.chi.il.us> jgostin@eternal.chi.il.us (Jeff Gostin) writes:
> >     Well, the reason I don't like it is that it isnt consistent,
> >especially when reading long posts/mail. It has a tendancy to "catch" a
> >line of the article in question, and leave it hanging up top, in place of
> >the status bar.
> 
> Well, uh, why didn't you say "My status bar is catching pieces of messages
> and keeping them there", instead of "How do I disable the status bar"?
> 
> I've used Waffle locally extensively, and haven't had this problem except
> when some ANSI driver was loaded.  Do you have an ANSI driver loaded?  Do
> you have anything funny going on with your video?  What kind of video card
> do you have?  (I suspect that the scrolling problem occurs in the nefarious
> lower right corner -- if a character gets printed in the lower right corner,
> then your status bar gets messed up.  That's why it only happens occasionally.)

This happens on my machine, too, inside DESQview or DESQview/X.

1.65b9 worked OK with dnansi.com loaded and video : ansi.  Now 1.65
release doesn't work no matter what combination of dnansi, video:
bios, video: ansi I use.  It catches parts of the next-to-the-top line
as it scrolls up.

I really don't care about it too much, as I use NN locally.  But it
would be nice to see who is online, instead of something they read
four posts ago.



[] ---
[] Mike Batchelor -- mike@batpad.lgb.ca.us
[] Long Beach, California
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
From: ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims)
Subject: Re: Super Poll beta release repeat polling program
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:44:53 GMT

fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner) writes:

>|BBS software should answer the phone instead of the modem...

>Waffle 1.65 will do this.  Put "auto-ata: ata" in your static file.

Now if only uucico would do it.
From: rettberg@geo.ol.ni.schule.de (Horst Rettberg)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: WAFFLE and NOVELL-Netware
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 16:17:35 CEST
Organization: Gymnasium Eversten Oldenburg (PLUTO-Projekt Uni-Oldenburg) Germany

In a few day I will get a Novell-Net V.3.11. Is there anybody, who has experience about waffle working under novell-netware?
Please contact me or post here if you have some tricks for me.
Moin, moin Horst


>   >  > >>-------------------------------------------------------<< <  <   <
>	     Horst Rettberg, Hundsmuehler Str. 176a, D-2900 Oldenburg       <
>	     Tel.: 0441/504199 (priv.), 0441/53775 (dienstl.)               <
>            E-Mail: Rettberg@geo.ol.ni.schule.de                           <
>   >  > >>-------------------------------------------------------<< <  <   <
From: jgostin@eternal.chi.il.us (Jeff Gostin)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Qedit with v1.65
Date: 4 Sep 92 01:35:08 GMT
Organization: The little node that could...

> Ok Im running Waffle v1.65 (Just upgradded last night), DrDOS6.0 and I 
> cant seem to get qedit to load as a editior.. I used the config. that it 

Ok, I think this just got promoted to an FAQ... :-)

                                   Jeff
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
From: king@rtsg.mot.com (Steven King, Software Archaeologist)
Subject: Looking for 1.65 -> 1.64 mail exploder
Reply-To: king@rtsg.mot.com
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:06:01 GMT

Someone had mentioned they were using a 1.65 -> 1.64 mail exploder with
the 1.64 version of WafMail.  Anyone know where I can find the exploder
program?

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
My other computer is an MS-DOS box with delusions of     |     Steven King
Unix-hood.  MKS and Waffle mostly get along together...  |  Motorola Cellular
               PShrink Wrap BBS, veck@pshrink.chi.il.us  |  king@rtsg.mot.com
From: jgostin@eternal.chi.il.us (Jeff Gostin)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Scheduler Needed
Date: 4 Sep 92 01:36:24 GMT
Organization: The little node that could...

system@micromed.com (Duane Davis) writes:

> jgostin@eternal.chi.il.us (Jeff Gostin) writes:
> >      Hi folks! I just upgraded to a 386/16, and DOS 5, and my AT.COM
> > program no longer works-- I kinda expected this to happen. 
> 
> Why would you expect this to happen? I too run an AT.COM program 
> (may not be the same one though) on a 286-16, two 386-25's, a 386-33
> and a 486-40 all with MSDOS 5.0. It works fine on all of them.
Because everything else related to this blasted system hasnt worked out!
:-) I went through 3 SETS of HD floppy drives, and 2 sets of ribbon
cables, then I couldnt jerry-rig my MFM to work with it, then it wouldn't
read my old floppies. Regardless, I got Waffle's scheduler to work! :-)

                              Jeff

...From a tiny little node called Eternal!
--
    /|Email  to:   jgostin@eternal.chi.il.us, offline@infopls.chi.il.us
   / |Smail  to:   Jeff Gostin, 917 High Ridge Pass, Carol Stream IL 60188
   \ |Vmail  to:   708-293-5526
    \|Flames to:   trashcan@eternal.chi.il.us
From: bobk@dogear.spk.wa.us (Bob Kirkpatrick)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 and Waffle
Date: 4 Sep 92 20:02:10 GMT
Organization: Dog Ear'd Systems of Spokane, WA

pertinax@raley.Gwinnett.COM (Pertinax) writes:

> I finally got OS/2 up and running (after 2 months of headaches) but now
> Waffle doesn't run right.  When I do a poll, I get a "master host timeout"
> error.  Can anybody help?  I have not tinkered with the settings yet.
> 
> Please e-mail responses to Pertinax@raley.gwinnett.com
> 
> Thanks.

I just helped set up a site that runs Waffle (1.65) in a minimized DOS
window. We installed it (out of the box, as they say) with the standard
methodology for any DOS install. What we did alter, was the uu.* parms
that may be added to the static file. uu.errors, uu.timeout were the
significant changes. We elevated these quite a bit.

It runs well, with no 'quirks.' :-)


--- 
Bob Kirkpatrick <bobk@dogear.spk.wa.us>
Dog Ear'd Systems of Spokane, WA
From: donal@brewich.hou.tx.us (Donal)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Awaiting Call     (Never any periods)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 92 11:16:25 CDT
Organization: The Brewer's Witch BBS, +1 713 272 7350, Brewich.Hou.TX.US

moon!cyberden!system@well.sf.ca.us writes:

> Ok,
> 
> This has been gone over a few times and nothing ever works for my system.
> 
> Once a day, someone will call and hang up. The modem relay will not click
> offhook when Waffle dies like it should and instead, it doesn't at all. It
> just sits there with no Awaiting Call ever showing up and people just call
> and call and call...
> 
> I've tried to send the old Echo +++ > COM2: and then a ATH... that's useless.
> 
> I thought this was fixed in 1.65 (which is what I am running.)
> 
> If you hit Q, you get the Awaiting Call and then it hangs a grizzly death.
> No periods, no nothing. Hang city.
> 
> I've tried that AT program and that didn't work either and the modem works
> 99 out of 100 calls... so this is a major problem. Vacations mean turn the
> BBS off and that sucks...
> 
> Anyone got a fix for this? I've actually just been putting a REBOOT in the
> run batch file when you hang up so... when someone calls, or I get a feed,
> POOF!
> 
> That seems to work, but it's a sucky fix.
> <X>orcist
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
>    |       /         |\
>    | H E   \ Y B E R |/ E N       [ moon!cyberden!system@well.sf.ca.us ]

Try AUTOBOOT. This program watches for hangs, and reboots your machine. I 
was having the same problem you describe, but ABOOT handles it. 
Occaisonally it times out a user before Waffle does, but other than that 
it has worked like a champ!
If you need the program, write to me and I will email it to you, 
uuencoded.

--------------------
Donal, Sysop of The Brewer's Witch BBS -- +1 713 272 7350
(Internet) donal@brewich.hou.tx.us  (Work) bill%pssi@lobster.hou.tx.us
(CIS) 76460,1443 
(SCA) Ld. Donal Dubh, IC of Dun Bruddair, B of the Stargate, K of Ansteorra
From: system@micromed.com (Duane Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: sysman and import for 165?
Date: 26 Aug 92 05:40:19 GMT
Organization: Micro-Medic  - +1 408 279 5240 - Public Access

mark@student.business.uwo.ca (Mark Bramwell, CS Staf) writes:
> I noticed that under 1.65, waffle sysman has an export function.
> 
> My question is:  Does anyone have an import function?
> 
> We want to give all incoming students an account on our unix based waffle
> box.  We have about 800 userids to create.  The main office can give us
> the output in any format including "name","first name","last name"
> and so on.
> 
> Before I start a new program, is this already available?


A few problems with that type of program....

    1. How are you going to come up with the account names? Can't use
       just the first name, too many duplicates. Same with first name
       last initial. What if the first name is more than 8 characters?

    2. What are you going to use for a password. Just about any info
       you would have on file would likely be known by people other
       than that student. Some dishonest person could really cause
       problems.

Probably the best way to handle it would be to have them just logon
and signup as a new user. Then have an external program that'll
compare their name to a list and upgrade the access level if it's
found.




-----------------------------------------------------------------------
System@micromed.com (Duane Davis)                       System Operator
Micro-Medic                                         voice (408)293-3299
711 Lincoln Avenue                   public access usenet (408)279-5240
San Jose, CA 95126                  public access pcboard (408)280-1610
               Authorized Waffle beta distribution site.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Richard Caldwell <nrc@bsbbs.columbus.oh.us>
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Wafmail for 1.65?
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 13:24:53 GMT
Organization: The Big Sky BBS (+1 614 864 1198)

jmeier@mother.bates.edu (Jon Meier) in
  <jmeier.1.714861142@mother.bates.edu> writes:
> Is there a WAFMAIL for Waffle 1.65 that handles the new
> mail file format?  If so, where can I get it?

There is a beta version of Wafmail that handles 1.65 mail
available via FTP (and probably mail server) from halcyon.com.  I
tried it but wasn't happy with the results.  The new features are
great but it seems a bit too buggy and slow to put out for public 
use, IMHO.

Instead, I have set up a batch file to call Budi Rahardjo's 
<budi@bison.mb.ca> explode utility before calling the old version
of Wafmail.  Explode will break a 1.65 mail file up into 1.64
style files for Wafmail 1.00r to process (Thanks for the handy
utility Budi!).  I'm not sure if explode is on halcyon.com. 

Here is my batch file...
----
@echo off
rem wafmail  baud(%1)   port(%2)  time(%3)  user(%4) Name(%5 %6 %7)
if not exist \user\%4\mailbox.f goto wafline
cd \user\%4
echo Exploding 1.65 mail.  One moment...
explode -i -b %4
:wafline
wafmail -b%1 -p%2 -t%3 -u%4 %5 %6 %7
if not exist \user\%4\%4.1 goto end
echo Cleaning up exploded mail...
del \user\%4\%4.?
:end
----

So far this has worked fine for me.  Your mileage may vary.  Void
where prohibited.

"Don't drive too slowly."         Richard Caldwell
                                  The Big Sky BBS (+1 614 864 1198)
                                  {n8emr|nstar}!bluemoon!bsbbs!nrc
                                  nrc@bsbbs.Columbus.OH.US
From: rat@ruth.UUCP (David Douthitt)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: TRUNCATED BATCH(es)
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 06:44:16 CDT
Organization: Network XXIII - +1 608 238 6388

fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner) writes:

| In article <oZPwPB3w165w@ruth.UUCP> rat@ruth.UUCP (David Douthitt) writes:

| || rat@ruth.UUCP (David Douthitt) writes:
| |
| || > I was getting the same messages during my testing of my Fidonet-Usenet
| || > gateway.  After generating messages to port, rnews complained about trun
[truncated]

| || > batch, and also "echoed" the last read data from the file again.
| || > 
| || > After some investigation, I determined that the problem was that I was
| || > generating files with CRLF pairs instead of the UNIX-style LF terminator
| || > After fixing my software to generate LFs, this problem went away.
| 
| Er, this just occurred to me -- Did you count the CR/LF pair as 2 bytes in
| your #! rnews line, or not?  If not, then this was your bug, not Waffle's.

There is no #! rnews line at all - these files are single messages with a
basic header on them and a ported using "rnews [opts] *.nws" which ports
them all (I forget which, if any, opts are in use).


--
UUCP: ....!remote.halcyon.com!ruth!rat  |  Network XXIII - +1 608 222 9253
InterNet: rat@ruth.UUCP                 |  32 Megs of Usenet/Fidonet programs!
==== Apple II Forever! ====             |  Files available more ways than
                                        |  any other BBS in America!
Files via: anon uucp, Fidonet FREQ, mail to archive-server@ruth.uucp, etc.