HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sp@questor.org (Steve Pershing)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: USA modems in Europe
Keywords: phone systems standards international
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 93 12:19:07 PST
Organization: Questor|Free Usenet News|Vancouver, BC: +1 604 681 0670

rlyle@nl.oracle.com (Rob Lyle  Wizard of Ozje) writes:

|> Anyone got any experiences with using USR modems (or any other 14.4K beasts)
|> built and bred for the States over in Europe?  (Specifically Holland/Britain)

Well, we have sold ZyXEL modems to people all over eastern and western Europe.
No one has had any complaints.

In fact, a Swiss client thinks that these are the best beasties for the money
that he has ever used.   :-)

ZyXEL even makes an intelligent modem RACK, which holds 16 modems.  Up to 255
such racks can be interconnected and addressed remotely.

If you need spec sheets, we have most of them (for ZyXEL and Telebit) stored
as *.ZOO archives.  These archives contain 300x300dpi TIF images of the spec
sheets.

We also have the latest ROM binaries available for those of you who can
"burn-your-own".

For a complete directory file and product listing, send e-mail to our
mail-server, as:

	mail-server@questor.org

and in the BODY of your text, include the following lines:

help
dir
end

Questor is non-profit, and makes available free of charge to anonymous
(or identified callers), many newsgroups supplying current and immediate
information concerned with the fields of Medicine, AIDS, Global Environment
and Native (indigenous) Issues.

Callers who cannot contribute, but who *identify* themselves by filling
in the questionnaire are granted limited e-mail access, and limited
access to posting messages and responses to the FREE newsgroups described
above.

By purchasing some of the selected hardware devices we make available
at slightly above cost, you support the FREE aspect of this site,
namely:  making available all the newsgroups concerned with medical issues,
AIDS, Global Environment and Native (indigenous) Issues to all callers.

--
    Steve Pershing, SysAdmin  <sp@questor.org>    The QUESTOR Project
  FREE access to Environ, Sci, Med, & AIDS news, and more.  [also UUCP]
        on a ZyXEL-1496S v.42bis, v.32bis, v.33, up to 16,800bps.
                 -=-         -=-         -=-         -=-
   Fones: (+1 604)  Data: 681-0670  Telefax: 682-6160  Voice: 682-6659


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: myllynen@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Olli-Pekka Myllynen)
Subject: Help needed with SupraFax v32bis
Organization: University of Helsinki
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 17:26:48 GMT

I am running SupraFAX v 32bis with a Macintosh with the factory settings
( by which I mean AT&F1 ) and have problems. The modem has H -ROMs.
 
I use the modem mostly for connecting to our University unix cluster( to reach
 Internet), which uses USRobotics. The line quality is generally speaking
 excellent here, but almost every time I can hear some minor, minor scratches
on the line, when the speaker is turned on. These scratch moments seem to be
the source of trouble. The modem either drops down from the normal 9600 bps
(and v.42bis) to 4800 bps (still the v. 42bis) or still stay with 9600, but
with all cases it seems to loose the common understanding with the remote end.
I cannot get anything through after those moments. In worst cases I get a
sudden NO CARRIER (as just now when typing this.)
 
OK, now I am back with a new call after that.
 
I have used also the %E1 setting as an alternative, but it only gives a a RT
display signal. All other things remain as above, and still I get trown out 
of the remote system.
 
Is there anything I can do about this? Any settings which I might try with?
 
I cannot afford to throw the SupraFax out of window, and buy something better.
 
Olli-Pekka Myllynen
myllynen@cc.Helsinki.fi

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: larry@news.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: Hayes Optima or Intell 440/e ???
Organization: Gator Communications - Feeds-R-Us 219-289-3745 
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 16:26:29 GMT

heiser@acs.bu.edu (William Heiser) writes:

>In article <C0Az3x.IMs@world.std.com> rsm@world.std.com (Robert Marlan) writes:
>>heiser@acs.bu.edu (William Heiser) writes:

>>? what about the USR 14.4 /16.8 ?  I am considering all of the above and
>>am curious why you are not considering the USR. What about the usr vs. the
>>t-3000? thanks.

>I think the USR 16.8K is an "odd duck".

By the same token the Telebit and PEP is an "odd duck", correct?

PEP's speak only to PEPs, and 16.8K HST's speak only to 16.8K HST's
(assuming a 16.8K connection), regardless of the fact that the 16.8K
HST modems speak to the slower HST, and the TurboPEP's speak with the PEPs


-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: ferm@e.kth.se
Subject: HELP! US Robotics HST DS and WINFAX
Reply-To: ferm@e.kth.se
Organization: KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, School of Electrical Engineering
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 22:13:32 GMT

I recently bought a USR HST DS 16.8 with fax. The modem works just fine.
It is possible to send a fax using "Blastfax", the program shipped with
the modem. What I want to do is use WINFAX (version 2.0) instead.

I copied the init-string a found in one of Blastfax's files and added
a command to set the modem in fax-mode, ending up with:

AT+FCLASS=1&FEQVX4&R2H1S0=0S13=1S19=3&D2

When I try to send a fax, the call is placed all right but my modem and
the answering fax never seem to shake hands. After a while the answering
fax gets boredand hangs up, leaving me with an unsent fax.

If somebody could give me some advice, I would be most grateful!

Thanks!

/Niklas
From: Hendrik_Schoettle@sl.maus.de (Hendrik Schoettle)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Modem does not hang up
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 93 20:19:00 GMT
Organization: MausNet (Mitglied im IN e.V.)
X-Gateway: MausGate/News 1.16/hb

Hi All!

My Modem does not hang up.
If I quit a mailbox the usual way (LOGoff), it hangs up, because the other
mailbox hangs up, too.

But if I try it with "+++ATH", nothing happens. There is still a carrier. I
just can drop the line by starting a cold-boot. I can type what I want, but it
just drops the line with a cold-boot.

Sometimes ist DOES hang up, EVEN not by the "usual way", but just with the
command "ATDP1^M +++ ATH^M". But SOMETIMES, not always :-(

My modem is a 9600bps Fax /2400bps Modem (SmartOne), internal.
My computer is a 386 33Mhz. I also have a few extra cards inserted, for example
a soundblaster card or a hercules-graphic-card, but I don't have any problems
with them in connection with the modem. I think it is jus a software-problem.

And this is my modem-configuration:

ACTIVE PROFILE:
B0 E1 L3 M1 Q0 V1 X4 Y0 &C1 &D2 &G0 &J0 &L0 &P0 &X2 &Y0
S00:000 S01:000 S02:043 S03:013 S04:010 S05:008 S06:002 S07:030
S08:002 S09:006 S10:014 S12:050 S14:AAH S16:80H S18:000 S21:30H
S22:77H S23:17H S25:005 S26:001 S27:28H

STORED PROFILE 0:
B0 E1 L3 M1 Q0 V1 X4 Y0 &C1 &D2 &G0 &J0 &L0 &P0 &X2
S00:000 S14:AAH S18:000 S21:30H S22:77H S23:17H S25:005 S26:001
S27:28H

STORED PROFILE 1:
B0 E1 L1 M0 Q0 V1 X4 Y0 &C1 &D2 &G0 &J0 &L0 &P0 &X2
S00:000 S14:AAH S18:000 S21:30H S22:71H S23:17H S25:005 S26:001
S27:28H

TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
&Z0= 35498
&Z1= 31820
&Z2= 21287

Thank's a lot for ANY kind of help !!!!!!!!!!

Und...Tschuess
Hendrik
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.fax:2381 comp.dcom.modems:18966
From: tnixon@hayes.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Toby Nixon to work at Microsoft
Date: 5 Jan 93 17:28:39 EDT
Organization: Hayes Microcomputer Products, Norcross, GA

In article <rdippold.726208899@cancun>, rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com
(Ron Dippold) writes: 

> tnixon@hayes.com writes:
>>I have accepted a position as a Program Manager in the Digital 
>>Communications section of the Advanced Technology and Business
>>Development group with Microsoft Corporation in Redmond, Washington.
> 
> Geez, you sure can pick the companies.  They don't deserve you,
> congrats.  As a final joke, you shoulda formatted it as a press
> release! 

I _did_ write it as a press release for internal consumption within 
Hayes.  But I didn't figure all you guys wanted my bio and 
accomplishments.  It's bad enough that you read Hayes' description 
at the end of every press release; you shouldn't have to read it 
with individuals, too!

And, uh, thanks for the compliment on my company picking ability (I 
think)  :-)

-- 
Toby Nixon, Principal Engineer      | Voice   +1-404-840-9200  Telex 401243420
Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc.  | Fax     +1-404-447-0178  CIS   70271,404
P.O. Box 105203                     | BBS     +1-404-446-6336  AT&T    !tnixon
Atlanta, Georgia  30348             | UUCP uunet!hayes!tnixon  Fido   1:114/15
USA                                 | Internet                tnixon@hayes.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: oml@eloka.demon.co.uk (Owen Lewis)
Subject: Re: Fax with encryption? 
Distribution: world
Organization: Eloka Consultancy & Project Management
Reply-To: oml@eloka.demon.co.uk
Followup-To: Fax with encryption
X-Mailer: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.19)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 19:06:39 +0000

In article <C0qM08.35I@newsserver.technet.sg> mathias@solomon.technet.sg writes:

>Ketil Albertsen,TIH (ketil@edb.tih.no) wrote:

>Same here, either you trust your secretary to decrypt the fax and then not
>let it lie around, or you keep in the machine until you arrive and start
>the printout.
>
>: In principle, the secretary may whenever an encrypted fax comes in page 
>: whoever is expecting a fax (secretary wouldn't know who!) to immediately 
>: leave whatever work he is doing run as quickly to the fax to enter the 
>: right number... No, that wouldn't work in practice.
>
>No, no, no. Decryption only takes place on printout, not when receiving
>
>
>: Same problem with public key encryption: The fax would be printed out,
>: and would be visible to anyone in the office.
>
Not so. At least one UK company of good bespoke systems has a complete answer 
to the probem of confidentiality after arrival. Those with a serious need,
please E-mail me.
>
From: charles.berlinguette@outlan.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Charles Berlinguette) 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: BOCA VS. SUPRA 14.4 MODEM
Date: 10 Jan 93 08:18:00 GMT
Reply-To: charles.berlinguette@outlan.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Charles Berlinguette) 
Distribution: world
Organization: Outland BBS  UUPCB  403-475-9588

-> From: richter@egr.msu.edu
-> Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,comp.dcom.modems
-> Subject: Boca vs. Supra 14.4 modems.
-> Keywords: Supra Boca Modem 14.4
-> Date: 10 Jan 93 21:15:27 GMT
-> Reply-To: richter@egr.msu.edu
-> Organization: Michigan State University
->
-> I would like to find out if any of you have any strong preference for
-> Boca or Supra brand 14.4 internal Fax/Modems. I can get both for
-> about the same price and I would like opinions on which is better. I
-> will also consider other brands if they are in the same price range.
-> If there is interest, I can post a summary to this group.
->
-> Thank you.
->
-> Jeff Alles

From experience using both modems before current ROM upgrades were
available, the Supra performed better than the BOCA over long distance
connections. But nothing in comparison, to an old style USRobotics DS
which is about the best modem I've used for consistently reliable
connections.

The supra also appears to have faster throughput of about 10-40cps.
                          
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: phrrngtn@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Paul J. J. Harrington)
Subject: Recommendation wanted for Class II with adaptive answering
Summary: comments on a good class II fax-modem wanted
Keywords: class II, fax-modem, adaptive answering, netfax, flexfax
Organization: DSG, Dept. of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 21:22:57 GMT

Hi,
I have been browsing around on the wais server for comp.dcom.fax and
looking at the scorecard produced by mshiels and have the following
questions

What do people recommend as a good modem to use for flexfax on a Sun
3/60 under 4.1.1 (without any patches applied) with send/receive of
faxes and also, the ability to dialup and log in. 

I have a scout+ external at the moment and am just running UUCP for
mail. I plan to shunt that onto a PC and run the Delrina stuff supplied
with it until I get the Sun sorted out. (BTW, I purchased the scout from
wolfgang@netcom.com who was extremely helpful and prompt)

Are there any bona fide class II's out there? I was not able to
determine whether or not it has stabilised. 

should I just go and buy an everex?
thanks in advance,

naturally I will summarise if there is sufficient response.

pjjH
-- 
Paul Harrington, phrrngtn@dsg.cs.tcd.ie, phrrngtn@tcdcs.UUCP tel:+353 1 7021445
Dept. Computer Sci., Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: hoyt@isus.UUCP (Hoyt A. Stearns jr.)
Subject: Re: WB vs gnufax
Followup-To: comp.dcom.fax
Summary: fax software for WB.
Keywords: fax, wb, modem
Organization: International Society of Unified Science
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 19:43:12 GMT

In article <SMARTIN.93Jan4164755@torsys02_1.uucp> smartin@Canada.lsil.com (Stephen Martin) writes:
>Does anyone know if the World Blazer with the fax upgrade will work with Gnu
>fax 3.2.1?? Would it be difficult to get it to work?

I'm looking at it now. Looks complicated, but possible (I noticed
some hard coded strings that aren't quite right, among other things,
plus It won't make for SVR4).  If you get it working, please post
and email me.
Thanks.

-- 
Hoyt A. Stearns jr.|hoyt@          | International Society of Unified Science|
4131 E. Cannon Dr. |isus.tnet.com -| Advancing Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal  |
Phoenix, AZ. 85028 |ncar!enuucp!   | System- a unified physical theory.      |
voice_602_996_1717 telesys!isus!hoyt The Universe in two postulates__________|
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: mathias@solomon.technet.sg (Mathias Koerber)
Subject: Re: Fax with encryption?
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 10:48:07 GMT

Ketil Albertsen,TIH (ketil@edb.tih.no) wrote:
: In article <C0pvqF.KBF@newsserver.technet.sg>, mathias@solomon.technet.sg 
: (Mathias Koerber) writes:

: >The whole scheme is just intended to make it difficult for unauthorised
: >people to read confidential incoming faxes. 

: My experience is that unauthorized reading of faxes occur when faxes
: *that are already printed out* are laying all around the fax machine.

Yup, that's why a fax machine should have enough memory to store incoming
faxes until they are asked for. A diskette or small HD should be enough.

: Most fax traffic that needs to be protected is business information.
: Most businesses have non-individual fax machines. So the secretary, or
: whoever handles the fax machine, must know (or agree with the sender)
: the decrypt key. 

Same here, either you trust your secretary to decrypt the fax and then not
let it lie around, or you keep in the machine until you arrive and start
the printout.


: In principle, the secretary may whenever an encrypted fax comes in page 
: whoever is expecting a fax (secretary wouldn't know who!) to immediately 
: leave whatever work he is doing run as quickly to the fax to enter the 
: right number... No, that wouldn't work in practice.

No, no, no. Decryption only takes place on printout, not when receiving


: Same problem with public key encryption: The fax would be printed out,
: and would be visible to anyone in the office.

: For private traffic and one-man-businesses, there aren't that many
: people to read the confidential information. And writing Happy Birthday
: to Grandma (assuming a modern Grandma who owns a fax machine...) is
: nothing to bother with encryption.

: K.A.

--
Mathias Koerber	                    | Tel: +65 / 7780066 ext 29
SW International Systems Pte Ltd    | Fax: +65 / 7779401
14 Science Park Drive #04-01        |
The Maxwell, Singapore Science Park | email: mathias@solomon.technet.sg
Singapore 0511                      |        swispl@solomon.technet.sg
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Eifersucht ist eine Leidenschaft, die mit Eifer sucht, was Leiden schafft *
From: dww@bnr.co.uk (David Wright)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Re: DOS-based FAX software for compact files?
Date: 7 Jan 1993 14:51:19 GMT
Organization: BNR Europe Ltd, London Road, Harlow, England.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.164.64.71
Keywords: ASCII, compression, efficient

In article <1992Oct24.122732.4209@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil> rdc45@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Code-45 CDR Peter Kent) writes:
#
#I'm using the MTEZ software that came with my zoom fax modem.  All the
#received, and save transmitted faaxes are stored in a format that must
#represent bit-imaging.  They are huge, 40-60 Kb/page.  Can anyone
#refer me to a software package that saves files in a much more space-
#efficient manner?

Actually they are already compressed, or they'd be even bigger!  But in my
experience most stored faxes will compress further with the standard DOS
archiving packages - try PKZIP (shareware), ARJ (free?) or ZOO (free).
You should be able to get these from most bulletin boards, or by FTP from
SIMTEL etc..  ZOO is occasionally posted to comp.binaries.ibm.pc

(I've just done a quick test, and zoo ah compresses a 40k Winfax page down
 to 13k, but it may not be a representative sample).

Regards,          "None shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity"
        David Wright  BNR Europe Ltd, London Road, Harlow, Essex  CM17 9NA, UK
dww@bnr.co.uk  <or> dww@bnr.ca  <or> uunet!stl!dww  <or> PSI%234237100122::DWW
<or> /g=David/s=Wright/org=STC Technology Ltd/prmd=STC plc/admd=Gold 400/co=GB
From: guac@brt.deakin.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Anyone knows .... ?
Date: 13 Jan 93 16:36:55 EST
Organization: Deakin University, Melbourne
NNTP-Posting-Host: vax1.viccol.edu.au

Hi,

We are in Austalia and may import Fax/Modem cards from a company, "Adtech
Micro Systems, Inc.". I'm wondering if anyone has used their products
(Datafax for internal modem and Comm-panion for external modem) ? or has
dealed with this comapny ?

Please E-mail me at guac@brt.deakin.edu.au

Thanks in advance !

Cathy


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: ming@isl.Stanford.EDU (Ming K. Lau)
Subject: printing fax file to laserwriter very slow
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 19:20:29 GMT

I've got netfax running on a Sun 3/60 and I can receive fax 
files without too much trouble.  The problem is printing 
them on a laserwriter.  I can use the PBM utilities to get 
a Postscript "bitmap" file, but this takes a long time to 
send to the printer (~ 10 minutes).  Are there any other 
ways to print the fax files to a laserwriter that are faster?


Thanks, Ming Lau
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: tj@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Terry Jones)
Subject: Identa-Ring call re-directors
Organization: UTCS Public Access
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:05:54 GMT

I remember seeing some brief discussion about identa-ring call
re-directors. Can someone email me a list of commercially availably products
and/or individual recommendations for products and I will post a list.

tj
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.fax:2377 comp.dcom.modems:18945
From: jonathan@hermes.bc.edu (Jonathan A. Duke)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Toby Nixon to work at Microsoft
Date: 5 Jan 93 14:00:53 GMT
Organization: Boston College
X-Xxdate: Tue, 5 Jan 93 08:56:45 GMT
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d16

In article <6614.2b481de4@hayes.com> , tnixon@hayes.com writes:
>I have accepted a position as a Program Manager in the Digital 
>Communications section of the Advanced Technology and Business
>Development group with Microsoft Corporation in Redmond, Washington.
...
>	-- Toby

Congrats on the new position.  Do post soon after moving.

	Jon
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: TARLEY_MIKE@TANDEM.COM (Michael Tarley, Jr.)
Subject: why so slow?
Organization: TANDEM COMPUTERS, INC.
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 06:31:06 GMT

Hi all,

I have an Infinity internal 9624 Fax Modem and WinFax 3.0 running in a 386SX
machine with 4Mb of memory. It takes me from 1.5 to 2 times as much time to 
send a document via this setup than by using a standalone Group II fax. In 
particular, there is a 15 to 30 second wait after each page. Why?

thanks, michael
internet: TARLEY_MIKE@TANDEM.COM
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: nhuang@cs.ulowell.edu (Bill Huang)
Subject: Auto Switch?
Organization: ZEN Self Constraint Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 07:04:52 GMT


Hi all you gurus, i paln to buy an fax/modem recently, but have confused
by the function of fax, does all the fax/modem do auto switch from phone
line to fax line? if not, how does it work out? thanks for any answer!

--Bill
 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: vulture@imperial.ac.uk (Thomas Sippel - Dau)
Subject: Re: Fax with encryption?
Reply-To: cmaae47@imperial.ac.uk
Organization: Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 13:31:57 GMT

In article <C0pvqF.KBF@newsserver.technet.sg>, mathias@solomon.technet.sg (Mathias Koerber) writes:
- Thomas Sippel - Dau (vulture@imperial.ac.uk) [me] wrote:
- 
- : Or you can view the bitstream that represents the pixels on a sheet of
- : paper as a message, and encrypt that. This would need a configurable lookup
- : table in the receiving fax machine, and a keyword exchange mechanism, 
- : presumably a public key system.
.....
- No, no. What I'm thinking of is just an extension to the existing protocol.
- Like now the faxes can negotiate whether a fax is in normal or fine mode,
- there should be bit that tells the receiving fax that the message was 
- encrypted. The key does not even get passed, nor does a part of it.
- Both sides will have to agree on a key to use, which is then keyed into the
- fax-machine.
.....
Your idea is really technology driven: It works for fax modems and would
be easy to implement there, but it makes no sense on fax machines which
have their mass storage in printed rather than post-processable form.

To implement with a fax modem, you would keep the tiff-file line structure,
thus ecrypting byte blocks. And you could use just a simple XOR encrypter
to do that.

I guess you could get an OEM job done from Magic Software (creators of
MTEZ), whose fax software is often being bundled with fax modems.
You would not even need an extension to the protocol for that, as it should
be perfectly obvious that the fax is encrypted to whoever is previewing
it. Or you could try to look at faxpax or netfax and bring it up on
your machine. (N.B. not for the feint-hearted, unless you run BSD.)

But you still loose the universality, i.e. you cannot just send encrypted
fax messages to any fax number and expect the message to get through,
It would need to be a fax modem and the software would need to be 
understanding encryption.

                               Thomas
-- 
*** This is the operative statement, all previous statements are inoperative.
*   email: cmaae47 @ ic.ac.uk (Thomas Sippel - Dau) (uk.ac.ic on Janet)
*   voice: +44 71 589 5111 x4937 or 4934 (day), or +44 71 823 9497 (fax)
*   snail: Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
*   The Center for Computing Services, Kensington SW7 2BX, Great Britain
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.fax:2390 comp.dcom.modems:19069
From: dave@frackit.UUCP (Dave Ratcliffe)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Toby Nixon to work at Microsoft
Date: 6 Jan 93 23:38:05 GMT
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: Data Factory Services, Harrisburg, Pa.

In article <6614.2b481de4@hayes.com>, tnixon@hayes.com writes:
> I have accepted a position as a Program Manager in the Digital 
> Communications section of the Advanced Technology and Business
> Development group with Microsoft Corporation in Redmond, Washington.

Good luck in the new salt mine Toby. Don't be a stranger. 

-- 
 vogon1!compnect!frackit!dave@psuvax1.psu.edu            |  Dave Ratcliffe  |
 - or - ..uunet!wa3wbu!frackit!dave                      |  Sys. <*> Admin. |
                                                         | Harrisburg,  Pa. |
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,comp.dcom.modems