HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pcm@duke.bby.oz.au (Paul McLeish)
Subject: NETBIOS for NFS Clients using Sun PC-NFS - how ? When ?
Organization: Burdett, Buckeridge & Young, Melbourne, Australia
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 06:20:35 GMT

We require NETBIOS capability for the PC clients for various PC based
products. The products are a fax server and a comms. server. NETBIOS
would also be usefull if I were to use Lotus Notes in its current
configuration.

So far I am lead to believe that
        B&W are have just released their NETBIOS capable version
        FTP are about to release their's
        Wollongong's Pathway product is already available

We are considering upgrading to 4.0a of Sun's PC-NFS to obtain the
features such as multiple windowed Telnet sessions, and a more
"Windows aware" environment.

However the cost of this upgrade for 40+ machines is quite high
(~$AUD180+ per), especially in light of the previous upgrade policies.
And it does not have NETBIOS.

If we could get NETBIOS into the bargain (4.1?), then it could be worth
considering.  But at this point we may be better off dumping the Sun
product and moving to a more re-active product with the feature set we
require.

Or should we be lookin at using the NDIS driver and obtaining a
product such as the Spry Inc NETBIOS ?

Is there to be a release by Sun of their NETBIOS version?
Is it in the pipeline?  Due soon?

Given the apparrently friendly relationship that exists between Lotus and
Sun, one might expect NETBIOS to be high on the forth-coming feature
list (Lotus Notes uses NETBIOS, and is planned to be released under
Openlook on the Sun).

Anybody know what other features are planned for the next release of
Sun's PC-NFS ? 


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul McLeish, Burdett Buckeridge & Young Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
Internet: pcm@bby.com.au
Phone: +61 3 614 8922
  Fax: +61 3 614 8742

 "Money may not buy you happiness,
  but it will buy you a big yacht and let you cruise right up alongside it."
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: toreh@bootes.sds.no (Tore Haraldsen)
Subject: Re: Accessing CDFS with PC-NFS 4.0a
Organization: Statens Datasentral A/S, SDS, Norway
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 12:58:14 GMT

I did the following:

(PC)	net use n:/d
(unix)	<removed /mnt from /etc/exports>
(PC)	net use n: <host>:/mnt -- filesystem not local to <host>

(unix)	<enter /mnt into /etc/exports>
(PC)	net use n: <host>:/mnt -- success

We run automount around here, maybe that is the problem??

-- tore
From: ichihara@rikvax.riken.go.jp (Takashi Ichihara)
Subject: NSF performance of RS6000 ?
Reply-To: ichihara@rikvax.riken.go.jp
Organization: RIKEN (The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research) 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-01 Japan
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 07:00:18 GMT

   Hi folks,

   I am now investigating the NFS performance of the IBM Power
station/server series. Because now we are planning to use a
power server 980 as a network file server over FDDI together as 
a computing server.  As for a computing server, I can get some 
performance values (Specmark89, SPECint92, SPECfp92, Linpack, TPP
etc.). But As for a NFS server, I can not obtain any performance 
report of the IBM Power station/sever.

   Does anyone have any performance report of the NFS of the
IBM power station/server series  ?  Especially I want to know 
the relative NFS performance of the power station/server compared 
with the Auspec 5500 server and the SUN SPARC server.

  Thanks for any information, and comments.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Takashi Ichihara
   RIKEN (The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research)
      (Internet/Bintet)  Ichihara@rikvax.riken.go.jp
      (HEPnet/span)       RIKEN::ICHIHARA (41910::Ichihara)

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: toreh@bootes.sds.no (Tore Haraldsen)
Subject: Re: Accessing CDFS with PC-NFS 4.0a
Organization: Statens Datasentral A/S, SDS, Norway
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 11:50:12 GMT

In article <1aepv5INN655@seven-up.East.Sun.COM> geoff@tyger.Eng.Sun.COM (Geoff Arnold @ Sun BOS - R.H. coast near the top) writes:
>Quoth toreh@bootes.sds.no (Tore Haraldsen) (in <1992Sep30.222327.25690@ulrik.uio.no>):
>#I have a Decstation 5000/120 running Ultrix 4.2 with a CDROM drive
>#with a CD containing the Windows NT Developers Prerelease software. The
>#CD is mountable and readable from Ultrix, and I can inspect the files
>#locally.
>#
>#I mount with options defperm,noversion. The file system is then
>#exported.
>#
>#I can mount the exported CDROM file system from my PC with PC-NFS 4.0a
>#installed, but I cannot see any files from the PC.
>#
>#What is wrong?
>#
>#How do I correct it?
>#
>#-- tore
>
>Most likely situation: you exported the CD mount point *before* you
>mounted the CD device on it. As a result, what you've done is to
>export the (presumably empty) directory that you used as the mount
>point.
>
>Fix: unexport the CD, then re-export it. 
>
>Geoff
>
>--
>Geoff Arnold, PC-NFS architect, Sun Select. (geoff.arnold@East.Sun.COM)
>-----------
>News software that enforces a four-line .signature limit is responsible for
>the fact that these postings just go on and on and on and seem to end in mid-

Nope, it does not fix it.

I got a mail from a fellow norwegian, explaning the problem like follows:

Ultrix has a minimum blocksize of 2k on the CD-ROM.
PC-NFS has a maximum blocksize of 1k.

Thus, no deal.

He passed a modified object file for the kernel, I have not had the time
to test it, but I will report back ASAP.

-- tore
From: mills@athena.lkg.dec.com (George Mills)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: Re: Custom Login on PC-NFS
Keywords: Login PCNFSD
Date: 6 Oct 92 23:01:46 GMT
Distribution: usa


Bummer, no takers eh :-(.
From: joan@hpindda.cup.hp.com (Joan Lawler)
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 22:03:14 GMT
Subject: Missing libmp entry points?
Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs

I have an ONC/NFS source license and the ONC/NFS 4.2 source product tape.  
Using those sources, I am building RPC 4.2.  I am running into some 
undefined externals, which might be found in /usr/lib/libmp.a, which 
exists on a SunOS Release 4.1.2 but doesn't exist on my non-Sun system.

The Sun manpage MP(3X) lists the following contents: mp, madd, msub, mult, 
mdiv, mcmp, min, mout, pow, gcd, rpow, itom,  xtom, mtox, mfree - multiple 
precision integer arithmetic.  Doing an archive list: ar t libmp.a on
the Sun gives the following: pow.o, gcd.o, msqrt.o, mdiv.o, mout.o, 
mult.o, madd.o, util.o.

I'm looking for a way to get the .c files that are used to build libmp.a.
The source product tape is lacking the necessary files for the following 
entry points used in building RPC: sdiv, madd, mult, pow, msub, mdiv.

Please reply via email: joan@cup.hp.com
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: rpc.pcnfsd error on Sun 3/60
From: hliao@calstatela.edu (Henry Liao)
Date: 30 Sep 92 15:30:06 PDT
Reply-To: hliao@calstatela.edu
Distribution: world
Organization: Cal State University, Los Angeles
Keywords: pcnfsd, error. rpc, sun

Does anyone know the cause of the following error message w/
pcnfsd V2?  It's running on a Sun 3/60 w/ SunOS 4.1.1 serving
PC-NFS 4.0a clients?

Sep 28 13:45:34 foobar pcnfsd[1785]: rpc.pcnfsd: yp_match failed

Is there a patch available for pcnfsd V2 to recognize all printer
names/aliases in /etc/printcap instead of name in 2nd field?

Thanks in advance.

-Henry Liao					o
California State University, Los Angeles	 )>
Networks & Distributed Systems Group	     ___./]___
VOICE:	(213) 343-4537, 343-4530	hliao@calstatela.edu
FAX:	(213) 343-4575			hliao@csula.bitnet
#include <std/disclaimer.h>
From: curt@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com (Curt Finch/131072)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: rs6000 pcnfsd v2 bug - net queue /mine
Date: 1 Oct 92 02:55:17 GMT
Reply-To: curt@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com (Curt Finch/131072)
Organization: IBM AWD, Austin, TX


After porting pcnfsd version 2 to the RS6000, (call your IBM customer
support organization if you want it and ask for ix28111) the following
bug was reported by a beta test site customer:


When the following command is executed on the PCNFSv4 client,

	NET QUEUE LPT3: /MINE

The following output is shown:

	NFS226I : queue for printer wdkos2 on server pob0002e for wdkamps
	Rank   Owner          Job Files                     Total Size
	1      wdkamps         37 nfs13948                  1
	2      wdkamps         38 nfs13961                  1
	Active             (null) t3F~              (null)
 
The last line seems to be garbage.


I've reproduced this problem with a Sun running pcnfsd.v2, so i know
it's not my port that's broken.  The packet that the 6000 sends
back to the PC looks right on the net.  To me it looks like PCNFSv4,
(the client side on the PC,) has a bug.


The /MINE seems to be the problem.  PCNFS appears to be expecting
a packet where QueueLength==QueueShown, which is what it always gets
when JustMine (or JustYours in a REPLY) is FALSE.  If JustYours is
TRUE it never works right.  The following is 3.2 AIX ipreport output
of a reply packet to the "NET QUEUE LPT1: /MINE" request:

RPC: **REPLY**  XID=717964364
RPC: 150001(PCNFSDPROG2) 5(PCNFSD2_PR_QUEUE)
PC:  PI_RES_OK  (0)
PC:  Comment=No comment
PC:  JustYours: TRUE
PC:  QueueLength=3  QueueShown=2
PC:  Position=1 PrintJobID=37 Size=1 Status=1
PC:   Client= User=wdkamps File=nfs13948 Comment=-
PC:  Position=1 PrintJobID=38 Size=1 Status=2
PC:   Client= User=wdkamps File=nfs13961 Comment=-


It is as if the PCNFS client sees QueueLength=3 and says "I'm printing
out 3 items whether they're there or not.  I don't care if there's
really only 2."

Has anyone else seen this and is it a bug or not?  Is there a fix from
Sun?


--
curt@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com (Curt L. Finch) | AIX NFS/NIS Field Quality 
My views are unrelated to those of IBM     |       Austin, TX
 -Public school administration has gone from 15% to 30% of expenses since 1960-
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs,comp.unix.ultrix
From: greg@duke.cs.unlv.edu (Greg Wohletz)
Subject: Re: Ultrix NFS slowness
Reply-To: greg@duke.cs.unlv.edu (Greg Wohletz)
Organization: UNLV Computer Science and Electrical Engineering
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 21:18:10 GMT

) >I've noticed that our ultrix machines are considerably slower than our
) >other machines with regards to NFS.  I've done some investigating of
) >DECstation 5000/200 Ultrix 4.2:
) 
) >ip 170: carey.6833b02a > bukka.nfs: 128 getattr fh 0,0/181403648.-2010575837
) >ip 138: bukka.nfs > carey.6833b02a: reply ok 96
) >ip 170: carey.6933b02a > bukka.nfs: 128 getattr fh 0,0/181403648.-2010575837
) >ip 138: bukka.nfs > carey.6933b02a: reply ok 96
) 
) 
) When you see repeated getattr's in a row like this, it means that you
) have attribute caching turned off.


Aha!  When the mount system call is called  the ac* structure elements
must be set, there are no defaults.  Since I was using amd, all my nfs
mounts were  being done  in this  manner.  A  quick  patch to  the amd
source has eliminated the problem.  Many thanks for pointing me in the
right direction.

						--Greg
From: brent@terra.Eng.Sun.COM (Brent)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: Re: /etc/mtab and file lookup
Date: 2 Oct 1992 16:46:35 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems
Distribution: world
Reply-To: brent@terra.Eng.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: terra

In article 92Oct2115900@vancouver.stars.flab.Fujitsu.co.jp, vander@flab.fujitsu.co.jp (Mike van der Velden) writes:
>Why doesn't the file lookup operation use the information in /etc/mtab
>as a prefix table? 

A couple of reasons I can think of:

(1) I'd hate to have the kernel depend on the /etc/mtab.  This file is updated
    ad-hoc by user processes (mount, umount, automount).  It would also
    be a source of nasty locking and deadlock problems (ick!)

(2) Lookups are very efficient in any kernel that uses a directory/name 
     lookup cache (DNLC).  I doubt that a prefix table would
    provide any significant improvement.


The DNLC is hard to beat.
---

Made in New Zealand -->  Brent Callaghan  @ SunSoft
			 Email: brent@Eng.Sun.COM
			 phone: (415) 336 1051

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: winfcjm@dutrun2.tudelft.nl (C.J. Mulder)
Subject: pcnfsd
Originator: winfcjm@dutrun2.tudelft.nl
Reply-To: winfcjm@dutrun2.tudelft.nl (C.J. Mulder)
Organization: Delft University of Technology
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:54:09 GMT

Hi there,

I try to compile the new pcnfsd.92.08.21.tar.Z with the WTMP option
in common.h

#ifdef OSVER_SUNOS41
#define BSD_STYLE_PRINT
#define BSD_STYLE_PR_LIST
#define BSD_STYLE_QUEUE
#define BSD_STYLE_CANCEL
#define BSD_STYLE_STATUS
#define BSD_STYLE_MONITOR
#define WTMP
#endif

If I run make I get the following output:

cc  -DOSVER_SUNOS41  -target sun4 -c  pcnfsd_v1.c
cc  -DOSVER_SUNOS41  -target sun4 -c  pcnfsd_v2.c
cc  -DOSVER_SUNOS41  -target sun4 -c  pcnfsd_misc.c
"pcnfsd_misc.c", line 495: ut_type undefined
"pcnfsd_misc.c", line 495: USER_PROCESS undefined
"pcnfsd_misc.c", line 496: ut_id undefined
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `pcnfsd_misc.o'

I can't find the ut_type - or the ut_id definition in any of
the source files. Does anyone knows? Do I missing something?
Please give me an hint.
Thanks in Advance.

Kees Mulder.
Technical University Delft,
Department: Information Systems.
E-mail:	C.J.Mulder@IS.TUDelft.NL
From: guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: Re: RPC version 3?
Date: 27 Sep 92 10:52:53 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara

>	I would also very much like to see a spec for this protocol;
>from what I saw of the application level, it authenticated mount
>requests and individual file requests.

That's precisely what I'd expect it to do, given that Solaris 2.x
appears, from looking at the header files, to "do Kerberos" by having a
new ONC RPC authentication flavor; that's what the Sun folks said they
were going to do, a few Connectathons ago.

As such, "Kerberized NFS" is like "Secure NFS", in that it's NFS running
atop ONC RPC with an authentication flavor that makes it harder to
present forged credentials to a server.  They may have the mount daemon
using Kerberos authentication as well.
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: backman@vaxeline.ftp.com  (Larry Backman)
Subject: Re: NETBIOS for NFS Clients using Sun PC-NFS - how ? When ?
Nntp-Software: PC/TCP NNTP
Organization: FTP Software, Inc., Wakefield, MA
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1992 13:34:45

In article <1992Oct1.062035.28365@bby.com.au> pcm@duke.bby.oz.au (Paul McLeish) writes:

 >> So far I am lead to believe that
 >>         B&W are have just released their NETBIOS capable version
 >>         FTP are about to release their's
 >>         Wollongong's Pathway product is already available

I hate polluting this list with trivia but FTP Software has been shipping
 a RFC compliant Netbios for at least 3 years now..


 Larry Backman
 FTP Software

Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: vharten@prl.philips.nl (harten van pr)
Subject: We still have PC-NFS4.0a problems!!
Originator: vharten@prl.philips.nl
Organization: Philips Research Laboratories, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 15:28:13 GMT

Hello there,


I still have problems with PC-NFS 4.0a. Our situation is as follows.
We have a backbone with gateways to several subnets. On each subnet
we have one or more NIS-domains. In one domain we have a SUN 630
NIS-server (fileserver) + 4 HP720 NIS-servers (applicationservers).
In this domain the PC's have a problem finding the NIS-server. After
a while I get the message:
  - Cannot find hostname by IP-address.
When you reboot the PC, most of the time everything works fine. 

I know you get the same message when an (empty) hosts-file is not
present or when RNMFILE.EXE is missing, but this is not the case.
When I change the PC to another domain (on the same subnet), every-
thing works fine. Because we have this problem only in one domain,
I think it has something to do with one of the servers, but slower
PC's have more trouble than faster. Can someone help me with this 
one?

			      Thanks in advance, Peter van Harten



------------------------------------------------------------------ 
P.R. van Harten                      Philips Research Laboratories
tel. +31 40 742209                   Prof. Holstlaan 4
email: vharten@prl.philips.nl        5656AA Eindhoven
				     The Netherlands
From: ciacovel@telesciences.com (Chris D Iacovelli)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: FTAM Supplier?
Keywords: FTAM
Date: 30 Sep 92 13:12:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: telescie.1992Sep30.131236.28537
Followup-To: rkemp@telesciences.com
Distribution: usa
Organization: TeleSciences CO Systems, Inc.

Does anybody in net-land know of an FTAM supplier? Please post or e-mail.

Thanks in advance.
Rick Kemp
rkemp@telesciences.com
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: rick@seminole.b30.ingr.com (Rick Hopkins)
Subject: NIS+ information needed.
Reply-To: b11!seminole!rick@ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 13:02:09 GMT

     Is there any place where I can get information on Sun's NIS+?  I've 
heard that there are some problems running in a mix environment of NIS+ and
the old NIS. 

     Real information only, I don't have time to read the garbage that comes
out of any marketing department.

Thanks, 

rick hopkins.
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: vanderwal@rc.tudelft.nl (Guus van der Wal)
Subject: SMC ethercard plus/A i/o port address and PCNFS
Summary: Does PCNFS' SMC driver work on io addrress 0x800
Keywords: ethercard io-port 
Organization: Delft University of Technology
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 08:31:26 GMT

I have a SMC ethercard plus/A to be used in an 
IBM PS/2 with MCA bus.
The card is software configurable, but when I want to
setup the io address I can only choose port addresses
from 0x800 on.
When I try to configure PCNFS with 800 as io address, I
get an "address out of range" message.
Older ethercards (genuine WD types) use port addresses 
in the range 0x200 - 0x300 and work without problems 
in this machine.
Fooling PCNFS by editting the DEVICE= starement in 
CONFIG.SYS with the /p800 switch does not work.
 
Question: Anyone ever encountered this problem and 
solved it?  Or am I overlooking something trivial?

If replied by E-mail: vanderwal@rc.tudelft.nl

Guus van der Wal
Computing Centre
Delft Universit of Technology			
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: vanderwal@rc.tudelft.nl (Guus van der Wal)
Subject: PCNFS, Windows 3.1 and Norton Desktop
Summary: Norton AV and SmartCan do not work together with PCNFS
Organization: Delft University of Technology
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 11:39:28 GMT

A colleage of mine uses PCNFS under windows 3.1 together with the Norton 
Desktop. Two TSR's he wants to use, are SmartCan and Norton Anti Virus.
 
The trouble is, when Windows starts up there are two error messages"
1. When the desktop is still empty:

   "SmartCan cannot be loaded and cannot be enabled"

   Although at AUTOEXEC-time there was no complaint on
   C:\NDW\SMARTCAN /ON /SKIPHIGH
   C:\NDW\IMAGE C: D:

2. When the desktop is almost filled"

   "Unable to load Virus Intercept for Windows.
    One of the Virus Intercept Drivers (NAV_.SYS or NAV&.SYS) must be loaded
    before staring Windows"

    In CONFIG.SYS the line
    C:\NDW\NAV&.SYS /B
    is present.

If NET START RDR * etc from NETWORK.BAT are not executed, there is no PCNFS,
but the error messages stay away.
 
Has someone experienced before that the mentioned programs cannot be used
together ??

If replied by E-mail: vanderwal@rc.tudelft.nl
 
Guus van der Wal
Computing Centre,
Delft Univ. of Technology
The Netherlands
From: guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: Re: NFS Protocol Specification
Date: 3 Oct 92 05:53:03 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara
Originator: news@auspex-gw.Auspex.COM

>The protocol needs an NFS_ACCESS RPC, which answers the question, "Does
>user X have permission to {read|write|exec} the file with filehandle
>Y?"

Many iterations ago, the V3 draft spec ("many iterations ago" means
"about the time I joined Auspex, or maybe even earlier", as in "around
1988, or maybe even earlier") had such a call.  I think the current
version has it as well.
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: sreese@loki.uhl.uiowa.edu (Scott Reese)
Subject: Problems with 4.0a 
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 20:49:43 GMT
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

We've experienced a problem after upgrading from PC-NFS 3.5c to 4.0a. 
Any help or ideas would be appreciated.

We have several PC's (2 HP RS/25C's and one Altec 386/33) connected to
gas chromatographs.  The instruments (and PC's controlling them) run all
night (unattended), acquiring data and printin out analysis reports.  
The software which controls the instrumments runs under MS Windows 3.0.  
We mount data drives and 2 laser printers from an HP 486 running 
Interactive System V 3.0 and NFS 2.1.  The day after we switched to 4.0a, 
we had UAE's on all the systems. This prevented the software from 
printing out all the reports from the previous night.  After closing 
down Windows and rebooting the computer, we restarted Windows and the 
chromatography software and attempted to print out the reports.  After a 
period of time (5 min to several hours), we again had UAE's.  We then 
installed Windows 3.1 on one of the HP's, got an updated version of the 
chromatography software (actually the same version, but modified to run 
under Windows 3.1), and brought it up with Dr. Watson running.  We again 
had the errors.  Each time, the program seemed to crash at the same place.  
Most of the reports from Dr. Watson were similar.  We have since gone back 
to 3.5c and most of the problems have disappeared.  At least we can run 
overnight.  What follows is a the header from a typical Dr. Watson report 
from this error:

Dr. Watson 0.80 Failure Report - Sat Sep 19 15:49:23 1992
ANALYZE had a 'Exceed Segment Bounds (Read)' fault at TKLIB 1:cbbb
$tag$ANALYZE$Exceed Segment Bounds (Read)$TKLIB 1:cbbb$mov  
ax,[1abe]Sat Sep 19 15:49:23 1992
$parm$, Last param error was: Invalid handle passed to KERNEL 1:02c3:
0x0000


Scott Reese
Hygienic Laboratory
University of Iowa
Oakdale Hall
Iowa City, Iowa
From: fab@batham.cs (Flavio Bergamaschi)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: PCNFS v4.0a Driver WANTED
Date: 29 Sep 92 17:20:54 GMT
Reply-To: fab@batham.cs
Distribution: world
Organization: Sun Microsystems

Does anybody know where can I find a PCNFS v4.0a Driver for an
Ungermann-Bass NICps/2 Ethernet LAN Adapter (Micro Channel).

I tried the driver (PC NIC) that comes with PCNFS distribution but
it didn't work. I believe that is a driver for the AT-Bus adapter 
and not for tha Micro Channel one.

Thanks for any information.


Flavio A. Bergamaschi  (fab@ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Department of Electronics and Computer Science
Southampton University , Southampton, SO9 5NH , U.K.
phone: (+44 703)592704   fax: (+44 703)593045 
 


Xref: sparky comp.protocols.nfs:2403 comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc:5433 comp.dcom.lans.ethernet:2057
From: cgd@ecmwf.co.uk (Dick Dixon)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc,comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
Subject: Re: Sun <=> PC Transfer Rate (Summary)
Date: 25 Sep 92 07:00:14 GMT
Organization: ECMWF

1 Mbyte/sec is actually not very difficult to do.  A Novell server on
any competent
platform (386/25; MCA or EISA ethernet) can easily serve multiple
streams to clients
on a single Ethernet at an aggregate of 1 Mbyte/s or better.