HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hcs+@cs.cmu.edu (Henry C Schmitt)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: IIci memory configuration question
Summary: Big SIMMs in either bank
Keywords: MacIIci Memory
Date: 23 Dec 92 14:49:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.Bzpvux.KG2.1
Distribution: usa
Organization: Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon

In article <1091@blue.cis.pitt.edu> nick+@pitt.edu (Nick C De Mello) writes:
>
>   20 Megs is definitely OK, you just need 32 bit addressing, 
>
>    BUT:  be carefull.  The way you described it "taking out the
>          quarter meg chips and slotting the 4 megs" won't work.
>          Remember you have an "A" bank and a "B" bank and the
>          biggest simms have to be in the "A" bank.  So you have
>          to move your 1 meg simms to the slots the quarters are
>          in, and slot the 4 megs into the bank the 1 megs were
>          in.  If you have any questions, or if I just made things
>          more confusing feel free to e-mail.
>
>
>                                        -- Nick

	WRONG!  This is correct for any machine EXCEPT the IIci.  In
fact, on the IIci it is PREFERRED to have the smaller SIMMs in Bank A
when using the internal video.  If you're using a video card, it
doesn't matter.  This information comes from Apple's Macintosh IIci
Technical Notes available from APDA or on the Developers' CD-ROM.


-- 
Henry C. Schmitt
Home: 2863 Beechwood Blvd.,Pittsburgh, PA 15217-3114 (412) 421-8482
Work: 2212 Hamburg Hall,5000 Forbes Ave,Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (412) 268-2257
E-Mail: InterNet: hcs@cmu.edu CIS: 72275,1456 AppleLink, AOL, GEnie: H.Schmitt
From: cent@u.washington.edu (Bob Cent)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: cx: 32-bit clean?
Date: 1 Jan 93 00:05:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: shelley.1i01rsINNer2
Distribution: world
Organization: University of Washington
NNTP-Posting-Host: cent.rprc.washington.edu
X-UserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
X-XXMessage-ID: <A768CBC8BB010B23@cent.rprc.washington.edu>
X-XXDate: Thu, 31 Dec 92 16:09:44 GMT

Some time ago I remember that Mac users were quite upset that not all the
Mac II computers were using  true 32-bit addressing (maybe just the cx). 
In fact, people were pressuring Apple to issue new ROMs to rectify the
matter.

Does anyone remember what this was all about and why don't we hear about
it anymore?

I am inquiring because it has been mentioned that I should be compiling
new Think Pascal/MacApp applications in 32-bit mode (?).  Please fill me
in if you are aware of this because it is news to me.

Bob Cent  (cent@u.washington.edu)
University of Washington, SJ-50
Seattle, WA  98195
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: pector@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (scott.w.pector)
Subject: Sony 1304S monitor vs. Multiple Resolutions in 24xp video board
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 06:03:14 GMT

Hello!

From some of the videocard discussions, I thought someone might be able to
answer the following quandary.  I have a Sony 1304S monitor & a MacIIci.
I am now thinking about getting a 24-bit video card.  My choices are
the Radius Direct Color/GX ($299 at MacDepot) and the Radius 24xp ($499).
The Direct Color GX is a 24 bit accelerated color board
that's limited to 640x480 pixel resolution while the Radius 24xp is a 24 bit
accelerated board that supports BOTH 640x480 and 832x624 pixel resolutions.

The question for me is whether the 1304S monitor can handle resolutions
in the Mac environment other than 640x480.  I've called Sony and have been
told yes and no on different occasions.  Mac User implies the 1304S is
an autosync and presumably could handle the different resolutions.  Radius
doesn't say anything about non-Radius monitors, but said since the 1304S
could handle up to 1024x768 in the 1304's spec  sheets, it might work with
832x624.  MacDepot said no, MacNews said yes, etc.

Because of all the uncertainty above, I'm not certain what the real story
is.

Sony calls the monitor and Multiscan Color Computer Display.  Its specs say
it has 1024x768 viewable pixels, the vertical sync signal frequency is
55-110 Hz, and the Horizontal sync signal frequency is 28-57kHz.  From the
spec timing charts, it supports 1024x768 interlace, 800x600 noninterlace,
and 2 types of 1024x768 noninterlace.  Presumably, there are other noninterlace
resolutions supported.  I adjust the screen size manually per Sony's instructions
for non PCs.

Any knowledge about whether the Sony 1304S will support the Radius 24xp's
832x624 mode?  (I've given up on Radius and Sony.)  Presumably it doesn't matter
which manufacturer's video board is being asked about since the question is more
about the use of multiple resolutions with the 1304S monitor with the
MacII family.

Anybody out there run into this situation?

Thanks in advance,
Scott Pector
From: jdsiegel@garnet.berkeley.edu (Joel Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: stop MAC vs PC argument!
Date: 22 Dec 1992 10:46:39 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Dec04.015736.137342@bmug.org> David_A._Schnider@bmug.org writes:
>>Absolutely. Couldn't agree more. Myself, I use an Acorn >Archimedes (A5000)
>which
>>completely knocks the above machines into a cocked hat, so I >don't have to
>worry:=) :=) :=).
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Rich.
>
>Nice.  One guy asks us to stop discussing, or bickering as he sees it and
>another comes on and agrees by lodging a third argument.
>
>1) New arguments are a terrible way to end old ones.

David, perhaps you didn't notice the :=) :=) :=) in the post.
This indicates humor or sarcasm.  Take a deep breath.

>2) Please don't ask others to stop discussing something they enjoy unless you
>have a viable reason (instead of that it bothers you).

There is a viable reason.  Long-winded arguments about Which
System Is Better belong in the .advocacy groups, not here, as a
previous poster already pointed out.  How would you respond if I
posted a restaurant review here, or asked about the equation used
to calculate warp factors in Star Trek, or started an abortion
debate/flamewar?  "A place for (most) everyt'ing, and (most)
everyt'ing in its place."

>***************************************************************************
>             From Planet BMUG, the FirstClass BBS of BMUG, Inc.
>              The above message was gatewayed via PostalUnion
>***************************************************************************
>The message contained in this posting is entirely the poster's personal
>opinion.  Any possible, real or perceived, (dis)similarities with the
>views held by BMUG, are purely coincidental.
>***************************************************************************

I'm a BMUG member, and I *hate* their .sig!
(But the BBS is great!)


-- 
Joel Siegel <jdsiegel@garnet.berkeley.edu    jdsiegel@ocf.berkeley.edu>
"Politics is the art of preventing people from taking part in
affairs which properly concern them."  - Paul Valery
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: sevans@andy.bgsu.edu (Stephen W. Evans)
Subject: Re: Apple video boards
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 00:58:54 GMT

Kirk.Jackson@f175.n2240.z1.ieee.org (Kirk Jackson) writes:

>I need information on to Apple video boards I have.  The first board came with 
>my IIfx and appears to be the standard 8bit color board.  What has me puzzled
>though is that it has what appear to be to Simm memory holders on it.  What I
>need to know is if this is a memory holder what goes in it and why?(additional
>colors or more speed, etc.?)  The pictures that I have seen of other apple
>display cards do not include these holders.  The second board was purchased
>new if a 8.24 standard board.  My question regarding it is if the first board
>is really expandable with additional memory is there a need to have the 8.24
>board.  One last fly in the ointment is that a wholesalers catalog shows that
>Apple list a 2meg upgrade for the 8.24 GC for about $300.  Is it possible that 
>the 1st card is a 8.24 gc card with the 2megs of memory removed which is
>making it display in 8bit mode.  I apologize for my lenght but I am new to the 
>Apple computer and I have no local source of Apple wisdom.  Please either
>reply here or via E-mail.  Thanks, Kirk Jackson.


The board with the two SIMM slots is an Apple 4*8 board which can be upgraded
to an Apple 8*24 board through the addition of 2 x 256K VRAM SIMMS.  These
are the Quadra 700/900 type VRAM.

The 8*24 GC comes with the capability to display 24bit.  The two SIMM slots
on an 8*24 GC are for GWorld RAM and do not effect the bit depth.  I believe
but am not sure that a pair of Mac IIfx SIMMS will work in the 8*24 GC card.

-Steve






>--  
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
> Kirk Jackson - Internet: Kirk.Jackson@f175.n2240.z1.ieee.org
From: peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: RE: Apple 16-inch vs. Sony CPD1604S???
Date: 2 Jan 93 18:23:49 GMT
Reply-To: peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce)
Organization: Peirce Software
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


In article <725875219.AA06686@blkcat.UUCP> (comp.sys.mac.hardware), Mitch.Alland@p956.f70.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Mitch Alland) writes:
> Monte Olsen writes in a message to All on 31 Dec 92:
> 
>  MO> Does anyone have any other information about this or which 
>  MO> monitor is best? 
> 
> I saw both in a store and found the Sony "fuzzier" than either the Apple or
> the NEC 5FG. This is not how MacUser rated the Sony in the January issue --
> they rated it better than the NEC. 
> 
> If you want multiple resolutions then I'd go with the NEC, otherwise the Apple
>   One thing that I don't like about the NEC is that it doesn't have a
> switchable power supply, so you need a transformer if you ever need to take it
> to a country with 220v current, but that may not be a consideration for you.

The reason I bought a Sony was that I thought the NEC as too fuzzy.

I wouldn't be surprises to see some variation among individual picture
tubes. 

--  Michael Peirce      --   peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org
--  Peirce Software     --   Suite 301, 719 Hibiscus Place
--                      --   San Jose, California USA 95117
--  Drop by booth #4463 --   voice: (408) 244-6554 fax: (408) 244-6882
--  at MacWorld Expo/SF --   AppleLink: peirce & America Online: AFC Peirce
From: Petrack@HAIFASC3.VNET.IBM.COM
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 93 20:45:35 IDT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Making a portable external 3.5 inch case
Reply-To: PETRACK@HAIFASC3.VNET.IBM.COM
Disclaimer: This posting may contain no views at all
News-Software: Usenet 3.1

Can someone point me to a small portable external case and power
supply for 3.5 " mechanisms?

From the magazines it looks like the La Cie cirrus case is about
as small as you can get. I have seen the adds for Liberty Systems,
but I don't know the details of dimension and weight. Can someone tell
me if they are really better (i.e. smaller and lighter) than the Cirrus
case. They are considerably more expensive, and since I want to put
a tape mechanism in them, the only difference for me would be portability.

Even better, could I buy somewhere
a special small and light power supply and small case to make
my own portable hardrive 3.5" whatever (tape unit, harddisk, etc.)?

I would like the power supply to be universal.

A final question: If I did buy a portable tape unit, say a La Cie Cirrus,
is it possible to take out the mechanism and put in my internal floppy
drive mechanism on those occasions when I want a portable floppy drive?
I realize that I need different cables. My question is whether a
power supply for a single 3.5 tape drive could be used without danger
for a 3.5 floppy drive. Would I have to buy some sort of "auto-sensing"
supply? I hope that I am not talking nonsense. Please tell me if I am.

Thank you,
Scott Petrack
Petrack@haifasc3.vnet.ibm.com
Petrack@sunbeam.huji.ac.il
From: jdh@kebmlor (Jeff Holmbeck)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Longer cable for Mac+ Keyboard
Date: 22 Dec 92 19:41:16 GMT
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

We have a Mac Plus and we would like to have a longer cable connecting the
CPU to the keyboard.  Does anyone know where we might find such a thing.
We have tried some local computer stores and Maya and MacSale mail order
places, but to no avail.

Any help would be appreciated.


Dave Cronk     (Cronk@cdc.com)    (612)482-3907
Jeff Holmbeck  (Holmbeck@cdc.com) (612)482-3255
Control Data Systems, Inc.
From: broccoli@maclpre.login.qc.ca (Luc Prefontaine)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: Memory SIMMs for the LCII
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 22:57:15 GMT
Organization: Luc Prefontaine Enr.
Reply-To: broccoli@maclpre.login.qc.ca (Luc Prefontaine)
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v2


In article <1992Dec19.171327.5530@oakhill.sps.mot.com> (comp.sys.mac.hardware), hunter@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Hunter Scales) writes:
> 
> 	I wanted to get a memory upgrade for my mac LCII (actually
> 	a Performa 400) and I have been told that the LCII uses a
> 	different type of SIMM than that used by the IIci, Quadra, etc.
> 	Is this true?  I thought that all SIMMs other than those in 
> 	the IIfx were the same.  If this is true, is there a designation
> 	to distinguish them?  How can I be sure that any used RAM that
> 	I buy will fit?  Thanks for the info.
> 

I do have four 1mg SIMMs on a shelf in my office and I asked my dealer if it
was possible to use 2 of them in my friends LCII to get a total of 6mg.
He confirmed to me that we could do so. The SIMMs are 80ns but I suspect the
LC to be satisfied with 100ns SIMMs or even with slower SIMMs.

BTW I'm the owner of a IIsi and I upgraded my RAM to 17Mg, that's
why I have these SIMMs at hand.

Hope it helps

+===+
Luc Prefontaine
4686 St-Andre - Montreal, Quebec - Canada H2J 3A1
Internet: broccoli@maclpre.login.qc.ca - UUCP: broccoli@maclpre.uucp
(514) 598-8572
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: skwong@cuse1.se.cuhk.hk (Wong Sai Kee (Graduate Assistant))
Subject: Re: IIsi accelerators and big video
Organization: Faculty of Engineering, The Chinese U. of Hong Kong
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 13:03:36 GMT

jdsmc@chevron.com (David McCormick) writes:

>Dear Netters:

>I am about to purchase a DayStar PowerCache 40MHz with FPU. My question
>is how do people like them and if I decide to get a 16" or 19" monitor
>later in the year, will there be enough room and power to run the monitor?

I also want to buy an accelerator card (may be the newer & cheaper
LogicXXXX 50MHz030 w/ FPU) and a 24bit Color w/ digitizer (e.g. the
VideoSpigot Pro) in the future.  And I also concern about the power
consumption & heat problem in a Mac IIsi as the Technical Manual said
the max limited is 7W only and the VideoSpigot Pro is 15W?

If you had any information, I would like to listen to you.

Thanks and happy holidays.

Mr.Sai-Kee WONG
skwong@se.cuhk.hk

Your email address jdsmc@chevron.com refused to receive.
From: peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: P5 v. PowerPC (WAS: Where the mac really wins)
Date: 23 Dec 92 04:41:21 GMT
Reply-To: peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce)
Organization: Peirce Software
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


In article <1992Dec11.092332.16609@etek.chalmers.se> (comp.sys.mac.hardware), janolov@cdg.chalmers.se (Jan-Olov Lantto) writes:
> In article <WAGNER.92Dec10161223@grace.math.uh.edu> wagner@grace.math.uh.edu
> (David Wagner) writes:
> >This is just my two bits, and it is said in hindsight, but if Apple were
> >to make this kind of arrangement today, I would say that they ought
> >to use the Alpha chip.  From what I know of it, (which ain't all that
> >much) it seems ideal for emulations.  If it can run OSF and VMS, then
> >(IMHO) it ought to be able to do `Mac' and MC680XX pretty well.  Of
> >course then we'd all have to be 64-bit clean, I guess.
> >
> >I sure hope the PowerPC won't have to use IBM `Power'-style
> >memory boards.  Those things cost an arm and a leg!
> >
> >David H. Wagner		"Buy the truth and do not sell it."
> >			Proverbs 23:23a
> >
> There are some big differences between PowerPC and Alpha, that makes Alpha
> unsuitible as a chip for PC s.
> 
> 1.  Chip area. Smaller chip area = lower production cost = cheap computers.
> 2   Power consumption. Low power consumption = can be used in notebooks.

My friends at DEC tell me there was one overriding reason that Alpha
wasn't picked over PowerPC: Politics.  The technological considerations
were a distant second.

Alpha is a very nice architecture, and with a few billion $$$ thrown at
it (and don't think IBM, Apple, and Motorola aren't spending BIG BUCKS
on PowerPC chips) you could build a variety of Alpha based chips much
like they are building a variety of PowerPC chips.

--  Michael Peirce      --   peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org
--  Peirce Software     --   Suite 301, 719 Hibiscus Place
--                      --   San Jose, California USA 95117
--  Drop by booth #4463 --   voice: (408) 244-6554 fax: (408) 244-6882
--  at MacWorld Expo/SF --   AppleLink: peirce & America Online: AFC Peirce
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: jek5036@ultb.isc.rit.edu (J.E. King)
Subject: Crystal Upgrades
Originator: jek5036@ultb
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 14:54:18 GMT


I have been reading people's posts about crystal upgrades in the IIsi and
IIci.  I know that the IIsi swap worked, but the IIci swap had problems.
Has anybody tried this in a Classic II?  Is it possible with the way
the logic board was designed?

Two: Is the Classic II FPU slot an FPU slot or a PDS slot?  Why can't
anybody (DAYSTAR DIGITAL HELP US PLEASE) put an accelerator/video card
in there?  The Classic II has Color Quickdraw in the ROMs, so it can drive
a color screen.  I quess I could get a SCSI screen, but..

Lastly: Can someone with a good working knowledge of the Classic II logic
board explain why it has a 16-bit RAM bus path (effectively making it an SX)?
Is this flaw repairable with a swap of components or something?  I do Mac
repair and programming, but my schooling is in Software.. I have no idea
how the logic board makes the computer run (other than what each chip does
individually..).  Please help me out!  Thanks, Jim.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: erwin@trwacs.fp.trw.com (Harry Erwin)
Subject: Re: Sticky Mouse Revisited
Keywords: mouse problem
Organization: TRW Systems Division, Fairfax VA
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 03:31:15 GMT

There is a discussion underway on the Washington Apple Pi BBS about just
this problem, but associated with Mac IIsi machines. Apparently it occurs
on an intermittant basis on many Macs running System 7.

Cheers,
-- 
Harry Erwin
Internet: erwin@trwacs.fp.trw.com

Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: brod@jessica.Stanford.EDU (Brodie Lockard)
Subject: Apple 14" monitor emissions?
Reply-To: brod@jessica.Stanford.EDU (Brodie Lockard)
Organization: Stanford University
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 02:54:50 GMT

Does Apple sell more than one 14" color monitor?  Do they all meet
Swedish radiation emissions standards?


Brodie Lockard      brod@jessica.stanford.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: jonathan@rahul.net (Jonathan Heiliger)
Subject: Re: 14.4k modems--feedback needed
Reply-To: jonathan@mecca.epri.com
Organization: Electric Power Research Institute
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 20:32:41 GMT

Todd (thf28310@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu) wrote:

: I'm in the market for a 14.4K v.42bis modem.  I'm looking at
: Zoom, Practical Peripherials, Logicode, and Supra.

    Take a look at the Digicom line of modems.  They make a modem called the 
Scout+ which is a 14.4k modem, with a built-in fax.  Digicom is currently 
working on a Voicemail feature for the modem, which is just a simple EEPROM 
upgrade, as well as the Class II 28.8k modem upgrade when V.FAST finally gets 
approved.  
    I sell the modems for $289+tax & s/h, if you are interested, give me a 
call or I can mail you some product information.

 
-- 
Jonathan Heiliger ........ Electric Power Research Institute
Internet: -/- jonathan@rahul.net -/- jonathan@mecca.epri.com -/-
Telephone <*> (415) 855-2888
From: mdong@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Michael Russell Dong)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: IIsi on it's side?
Date: 21 Dec 92 23:18:58 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly State Univ,CSC Dept,San Luis Obispo,CA 93407

In article <1h56u9INNhas@morrow.stanford.edu> kayt@deathstar.Stanford.EDU (Kayt Sorhaindo) writes:
>
>I used to work at Apple on their 800 number. I remember seeing one  
>technical article that said that IIsi should NOT be placed on its side.
>It probably works, but in this case, they don't recommend it. If the  
>system fails and the failure can be traced to the computer being on its  
>side, then Apple wouldn't cover the failure under warranty. 
>Whatever, Kayt

If this is true, then Apple should *specifically* stat, in the manual, *not* to place the IIsi on it's side.


-- 
________________________________________________________________________
Internet: mdong@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu / "Don't take everything you see 
          mdong@trumpet.calpoly.edu     \  on TV seriously."             
          mdong@eros.calpoly.edu        /        -- Danny Boy Quayle(e?) 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: tapsa <tapsa@dmgr.fi>
Subject: More speed to fx
X-Xxdate: Mon, 28 Dec 92 22:57:32 GMT
Organization: DMGR
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d16
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 20:53:52 GMT


Hi netters,

We would like to have more speed for fx. Does someone have experience
with acceleration boards in Mac fx e.g 68040/50 MHz. We have heard about 
problems with Radius Rockets'. If there is somewhere statistics about 
such products in fx could some friendly soul inform us (price, power,
manufacturer).
Buying Quadra 950 is not a solution for us.

Happy New Year to all of you.

Tapio Salo
Data Manager Oy
Toivolankatu 5
20810 TURKU
FINLAND
Email: tapsa@dmgr.fi
From: lyons@scri.fsu.edu (Jim Lyons)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: IIci memory configuration question
Date: 22 Dec 92 15:23:18 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Florida State University

I am getting a IIci with 5MB. I assumed there would be two banks of 
memory, one with 4x256K and one with 4x1M.  It was my intention to remove 
the four 256K SIMMs and replace them with four 4MB SIMMs, giving me 20MB. 
I don't have any technical info on memory configurations in the IIci, but 
according to one of the detailed ads for a RAM chip company in the back of 
MacWeek, this isn't allowed. :^(

Could some kind soul who knows please post the memory configuration 
options for the IIci. Is 20MB an allowed configuration? (BTW, I am 
planning to use the Radius VideoVision card as my display card, so I don't 
have to worry about memory contention by the built-in display controller, 
right?)

Jim Lyons           [][]  Supercomputer Computations Research Institute
lyons@scri.fsu.edu  [][]  Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
From: hcs+@cs.cmu.edu (Henry C Schmitt)
Subject: Re: IIci memory configuration question
Summary: 20Mb OK
Keywords: IIci Memory
Organization: Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 19:19:05 GMT

In article <11594@sun13.scri.fsu.edu> lyons@scri.fsu.edu (Jim Lyons) writes:
>Is 20MB an allowed configuration?
>
	20Mb is definately acceptable, My IIci has had 20Mb for over 2
months now.



-- 
Henry C. Schmitt
Home: 2863 Beechwood Blvd.,Pittsburgh, PA 15217-3114 (412) 421-8482
Work: 2212 Hamburg Hall,5000 Forbes Ave,Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (412) 268-2257
E-Mail: InterNet: hcs@cmu.edu CIS: 72275,1456 AppleLink, AOL, GEnie: H.Schmitt
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware