From: vqt00@DUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Married With Children)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Subject: Re: Bush
Date: 9 Oct 92 19:08:25 GMT
Reply-To: vqt00@DUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Married With Children)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA


In article <1992Oct7.204125.10676@news.media.mit.edu> 0005359961@mcimail.com writes:
>
>     Bush the anti-crime president? He gotta be kidding! A
>statistics released this week shows that felony crimes have
>increased since Bush took office in 1988. Rape, murder, and drug
>related offenses all grow in double digit figures. 

While I am still undecided on whom to vote for, I feel that Pres. Bush
is not responsible for the increase rapes and murder in this nation.
He did something about these crimes: more prisons, tougher sentence on
drug smuglers.  What else can he do ?
Besides the crime rate in the US has always been rising in the last 50
years.

>     The environmental president? Bush forgot that it was he who
>embarrassed America by failing to take the lead in the Earth Summit
>earlier this summer! He failed to protect the America's wetland by

I agree with you on this.  I think the the issue here is the cost.
At what cost should we protect the environment ?

>     Then there's a thing called S&L. Go ask Continental Savings
>depositors! Billions and billions dollars have been wasted in order
>to bail out those collapsed institutions. And all the crooks and

Bush did not cause the S&L mess.  He inherits the problem.

>They have often sided with big business and government. And don't
>forget, EEOC, the enforcer of equal opportunity, has failed to
>investigate over 40% of discrimination complaints filed by
>employees. Go ask Dr. An Nguyen, a Vietnamese scientist at the
>University of Georgia, about his feeling of being fired without any
>reason!

What does Dr. An say about his being fired ?  Talking about the 40%
figure, it's very high because only 10% of the crimes in the US are
solved.

>     Back to the real world and the 1990's. Need not to say, Bush's
>handling of the economy is very terrible. He has denied the R-word
>for so long that one must have wondered in which world he lives in.
>He blames it on everyone, except for his administration, from the
>cyclic nature of capitalism to Saddam Hussein to the gridlock
>congress. So, he asks the American people to replace another

The economy is not only bad in the US, it's also bad in Japan, England
Italy, France, Soviet Union, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Laos, Cambodia, almost
everywhere.  I think it's bad in the US but it may be even worse some
where else.  Unemplyment rate in the US is around 8%, it's even higher
in England, VN, Soviet Union and many other countries.  The bad economy
in the US is not caused by Bush.  The whole world experinces it.  The
US economy is also affected globally, by events happening in other
countries.

>Bush failed this test.
>     Lack of judgement can not be a good leader.
>     Lack of compassion can not be a good leader.
>     Lack of leadership can not be a good leader.
>the expenses of historic developments in recent years. Bush is not
>a good leader!

So you point out problems.  What are the solutions ?
Who should be the President of the USA ?  Some body told me that in an
election you choose between a bad and the worse.  The question to be
asked is who is the worse.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese