From: cs922177@ariel.yorku.ca (DANIEL T FARKAS)
Subject: Re: Subliminal Advertising
Organization: York University, Toronto, Canada
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 15:58:30 GMT

In article <1993Jan20.155218.7368@gw.wmich.edu> x92paszek@gw.wmich.edu writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.182735.9943@spectra.com>, johnson@spectra.com (boyd johnson) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan19.181147.2036@samba.oit.unc.edu> Mic.Oettinger@launchpad.unc.edu (Mic Oettinger) writes:
>>>In article <3485@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> joemays@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Joseph F. Mays) writes:
>>>>In article <brad_lange-180193154557@222.188.55.223> brad_lange@chdqm1.sps.mot.com (Brad Lange) writes:
>>>>|n article <C1293K.4BK@dcs.ed.ac.uk>, rmv@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Robin Vickery)
>>>>|wrote:
>>>>
>>>>|> In article <C11ttz.Juu@dcs.ed.ac.uk>, gk@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Gavin Kerr) writes:
>>>>|>> In article <C0x5y4.B3o@coral.cs.unm.edu> sgupta@coral.cs.unm.edu (Sarang Gup
>>>>|ta) writes:
>>>>|>>>In article <1993Jan14.212542.3959@news.arc.nasa.gov> nicholso@pioneer.arc.n
>>>>|asa.gov (Melvin H. Nicholson YBH) writes:
>>>>
>>>>|>>>>Your message
>>>>|>>>>on submlinals
>>>>|>>>>underscores an
>>>>|>>>>important point
>>>>|>>>>deserving praise
>>>>|>>>>instead of flames
>>>>|>>>>others might fling
>>>>|>>>>to you so viciously
>>>>
>>>>|>>>>Mel
>>>>
>>>>|>>>I wonder how many people
>>>>|>>>got your message?
>>>>|>>>Everyone I taked to
>>>>|>>>thought it was an
>>>>|>>>interesting message,
>>>>|>>>though they didn't understand it fully.
>>>>
>>>>|>>Same here,I spoke to
>>>>|>>over 30 people who
>>>>|>>didnt get it.
>>>>|>>I of course
>>>>|>>did try to explain it
>>>>|>>in words of one syllable.
>>>>
>>>>|>didn't ask me though
>>>>|>i got it (eventually)
>>>>|>though I have to admit
>>>>|>that it did take a while.
>>>>|>only joking :-)
>>>>
>>>>|My friends and I
>>>>|especially liked
>>>>|the way the
>>>>|original post lined
>>>>|out so nicely on the right.
>>>>
>>>>|Brad
>>>>
>>>>Spelling errors had a lot
>>>>to do with the lining effect.
>>>>Of course, he may have intentionally
>>>>put the misspelled word in
>>>>to achieve that effect.  He may
>>>>have thought his message was obvious otherwise.
>>>>It took me about three seconds to see it.
>>>>Some people are too impressed with themselves.
>>>>
>>>>Joe
>>>
>>>Joe, I think that
>>>everyone here will
>>>agree with you, but
>>>lately you seem rather
>>>obsessed with Mel and his
>>>unique style. Believe me, I
>>>sympathize you and your problems.
>> 
>> You are being a bit hard
>> on Joe.  After all, not everyone will
>> understand what Mel is really saying.
>> Nevertheless, I also hate it when
>> everyone tries to analyze and 
>> rail on about mis-spellings and other
>> dumb things like that.
>> 
>> -- 
>> ======== Boyd Johnson    nosc!spectra.com!johnson  San Diego, Ca. ========
>
>
>Suffice to say,
>this has gone on far too long.   I'm sure you will
>understand when I ask you to
>please not place another folloup
>involving this 
>disgustingly silly post.
>
>
>
>-Mateusz        ;-)  =======8      (the circumcized braggart)
>
Even I am getting tired of reading
nothing but repeats of the 
old jokes here.  Why don't people
understand?  Even a good joke
gets stale after a while.  We
have to start something new allready!