HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: xoanon@carina.unm.edu (timothy k istian soholt)
Subject: Re: Hurricane and Jurassic Park
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 21:48:21 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Distribution: na

wu@mdd.comm.mot.com (Philip Wu) writes:

>Actually, in the book, there is supposed to be a big storm that knocks
>over trees, etc.  So this might actually fit in quite nicely.

Assuming someone was crazy enough to keep shooting while the storm was
going on.

-- Tim Soholt (xoanon@carina.unm.edu), The Man With No .sig


Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: scoile@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Steve Coile)
Subject: Re: Time for rec.arts.sf.ALIEN !!!
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 04:52:21 GMT

Marcus Lindroos writes:
>Starting a dedicated newsgroup for the Aliens triology(sp) looks like the only
>sensible solution. Face it: there are four "classic" space-based
>SF movie series - Star Wars, Star Trek, Alien and 2001/2010. At least they're
>the ones that have spawned sequels, been huge smash hits around the world
>and (that true measure of superstardom) have newsgroups of their own.
>OK, 2001/2010 may be the exception but Alien should DEFINITELY have a 
>discussion forum of its own. Fans of the films like myself will be delighted 
>to have all the related stuff in one place, while those who can't stand Alien 
>won't have to browse through dozens of Aliens postings a day. If "the Aliens"
>move out of r.a.sf.movies, there would be lots of room for other material. 

1) Anyone who knows anything about using a decent newsreader will never see
any of the articles on _Alien[s]_.  I've had / alien/h:j in my KILL file for
some time, and every time I read rec.arts.sf.movies, that entry wipes out a
large number of articles.  Now, you might say that this volume, despite that
it is easily picked out and removed, is what justifies a newsgroup, but:

2) The number of articles, and presumably the number of people interested, is
relatively too small to warrent a new newsgroup.  Aside from articles on
_Alien[s]_, there are maybe only 10 to 20 other articles on r.a.sf.m daily.
For me, this is a VERY low volume newsgroup.  I don't think you would be able
to get the 100 person margin necessary to create the group.

3) (Just to pick nits) "If 'the Aliens' move out of r.a.sf.movies, there would
be lots of room for other material."  What other material?  You think that,
somehow, the number of articles regarding "the Aliens" keep *other* articles
from being posted?  If you take out _Alien[s]_ related stuff, r.a.sf.m will
practically vanish!

I don't think we need it (then again, I didn't think we needed r.a.starwars,
or whatever it ended up as, yet it made it).  Has anyone considered creating
something along the lines of alt.movies.alien?

>The more newsgroups, the better! 

Heh.  You obviously haven't been keeping up with news.groups!  =)

>MARCU$

 Steve "Stevers!" Coile                    scoile@gmuvax[{.BITNET|[2].gmu.edu}]
            "Maturity is knowing when and where to act immature"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: schlegel@cwis.unomaha.edu (Mark Schlegel)
Subject: I want to complain...
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 18:51:53 GMT


I'm here to complain about people who complain about people who complain
about too much Aliens 3. I'm getting sick and tired of all this complaining
about complaining about people who complain about aliens and I think all
further complaints ....

Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.movies:6952 rec.arts.movies:27132
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies,rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Godzilla / Nike TV Ad
From: news@massey.ac.nz (USENET News System)
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 21:25:37 GMT
Organization: School of Maths and Info Sciences, Massey University, NZ.

In article <1992Sep7.204756.181@news.uwyo.edu> rtravsky@news.uwyo.edu (Rich Travsky) writes:
>Xref: cc-server4.massey.ac.nz rec.arts.sf.movies:7288 rec.arts.movies:57455
>Path: cc-server4.massey.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!uunet!noc.near.net!news.Brown.EDU!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!csn!news.uwyo.edu!rtravsky
>From: rtravsky@news.uwyo.edu (Rich Travsky)
>Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies,rec.arts.movies
>Subject: Godzilla / Nike TV Ad
>Message-ID: <1992Sep7.204756.181@news.uwyo.edu>
>Date: 7 Sep 92 20:47:56 MST
>Distribution: world
>Organization: Banzai Institute
>Lines: 12

>Just saw a commercial on tv.  Starts out with scenes of Godzilla.
>Narrator says things like "he's defeated Mothra; he's defeated
>Mecha-Godzilla" etc. Then narrator says 'come Sept. 9th he'll
>meet a real challenge', and they show a giant Charles B. (some 
>basketball player, already fergot his name :(  ) dribbling a ball 
>between some buildings.  

>It's an ad for Nike shoes. Guess I'll have wait for the 9th...

>Richard Travsky
>Division of Information Technology     RTRAVSKY @ CORRAL.UWYO.EDU
>University of Wyoming                  (307) 766 - 3663 / 3668

We never got the ad for the ad, we just got the ad, and have had it for a 
couple of weeks - actually its quite cool. Post me if you can't wait and I'
ll tell you what happens! :)

Brenden
From: rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu (Jeff Bytof)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Deckard is a replicant?
Date: 13 Sep 1992 02:54:37 GMT
Organization: sio
NNTP-Posting-Host: lutherlab.ucsd.edu

What evidence is there in the film and the book it's based on that Deckard
is a replicant?  Interesting idea.

Jeff Bytof
rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: Deckard is a replicant?
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:57:23 GMT

In article <allan.3.716511942@slab.unt.edu> allan@slab.unt.edu (Mark Allan) writes:
>In article <6360@transfer.stratus.com> jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Jim Mann) writes:
>
>>In article <rabjab.95.0@golem.ucsd.edu> rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu (Jeff  
>>Bytof) writes:
>>> What evidence is there in the film and the book it's based on that  
>>Deckard
>>> is a replicant?  Interesting idea.
>>> 
>>AARGH.  Most of the old-time readers of the SF groups (old time ==
>>more than a year or so) have just covered their heads and hidden
>>under their desks.
>
>If so, would the old-timers please fill in us young-uns w/ a brief summation 
>of facts?

Time to post that book's name again:

Judith Kerrman's _Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott's
Blade Runner and Phillip K. Dick's DADOES_.  It's published by Bowling
Green Univeristy Popular Press.  You can get the address at your local
bookstore.  It costs around $20 for the trade paperback edition.  The
book contains critical essays on the film, such as examining the
antecedants of BR (Milton's _Paradise Lost_), the motif of the City,
etc.  There is also a minute-by-minute breakdown of the movie, that
points out where the replicants' eyes glow, differences between the
general release version and the screenplay, etc.  A useful book, if
you want to think about the film a bit seriously.

--
"It's a Drake's Coffee Cake....  I have another one, but I'm saving
it for _later_."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: kelly@micro.cs.umn.edu (Shaun P. Kelly)
Subject:  Significance of the Unicorn?
Summary: Thoughts...
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 22:14:56 GMT

Okay.  After having seen the DC, and the unicorn sequence...some
thoughts relevant to it and the Deckard=Replicant question...
 
First, we've got all the family photos Deckard has.  Photos, just like
Rachel, just like Leon....All over the piano and all...

While playing with the photos, we get the unicorn sequence.  Now,
at the end of the movie, we get Gaf's unicorn and the voice-over...How
does Gaf know about the Unicorn?  Is it the same way Deckard knows
about the spider?  

Just adding fuel to the fires of debate, and curious if anyone else
though it significant...

-shaun


From: mikep@hpmwtd.sr.hp.com (Mike Powell)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:13:27 GMT
Subject: Re: Blade Runner Director's Cut (SPOILERS)
Organization: HP Santa Rosa Site (NMD MTA MWTD)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies

	
	I'm new to discussions on BR, but in the several times I've seen
	Blade Runner, only my first viewing was at the theater, all others
	were the video release.

	In watching the DC version last Sat. I noticed that in the
	scenes where we first see Roy (in the 'phonebooth'?) before
	he stepps out to meet Leon, he is shown making that painful
	fist.  There is also a close-up of him that shows something
	one can't see in the video version.  There is a single
	index finger on his shoulder.

	Strange, I thought.  Who else is in the booth with him?

	Later, when Roy meets Tyrell, the finger shows up again, but it
	is clear that the finger belongs to Tyrell... as his hand is
	on Roy's shoulder.  

	The editors apparently decided to use the same footage for the
	close-up shot of Roy at his introduction, hoping no one would
	notice the finger (they also horizontally flipped the image).

	Anyone notice that beside me? (maybe I'm just seeing things...) 

	-Mike-

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: Petri.Wessman@hut.fi (Petri Wessman)
Subject: Re: DROP THE DISCUSSION OF ALIENS ALREADY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply-To: Petri.Wessman@hut.fi
Organization: La Gata Encantada
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 18:34:15 GMT

On Sat, 5 Sep 1992 15:19:00 GMT, mjm3170@zeus.tamu.edu (MATTSON, MATTHEW JUL) said:

MATTSON> HOW LONG ARE YOU PEOPLE GOING TO KEEP DISCUSSING THE SAME THREADS
MATTSON> OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER.....

MATTSON> ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!


Until Alien(ses)^4? :-)

Oh, and read the manual page on "kill files" while you're waiting...

//Petri
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: kenl@origami.cc.bellcore.com (Ken Lehner)
Subject: Hurricane and Jurassic Park
Keywords: bummer
Organization: Bellcore
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 13:17:29 GMT

Just heard that the 130 person cast and crew filming "Jurassic Park" on
Kauai had to seek refuge in a hotel because of hurricane Iniki.  Hope this
doesn't set them back too much, but I'm not optimistic.
From: mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Alien^3: religious and pre-modern
Date: 7 Sep 92 11:59:38 GMT
Organization: DB and ES Subdivision, TU Vienna

From article <5536@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>, by news@pitt.edu (USENET News System):
> 	One of my main objections to this kind of thing is that it appears
> to me that people go WAY too far in order to find these kind of
> interpretations. Only a rather rabid Freudian would find much sexual about
> the Alien. [...] If, of course, you really believe that any long,
> rigid object is penis imagery and any hole is vaginal imagery, fine, but
> I think that's ridiculous. As Sigmund himself said, "Sometimes a cigar
> is just a cigar."

Take a look at the other works of H.J. Giger (the Swiss artist who
designed the Alien).  I don't know or care whether Giger is a rabid
Freudian (could be, at that), but those sexual motifs are quite
present, and intentional.  (I've often wondered what that guy dreams,
but I've concluded that I prefer not to know.)

-- 
Markus Stumptner                                mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
University of Technology Vienna                 vexpert!mst@relay.eu.net
Paniglg. 16, A-1040 Vienna, Austria             ...mcsun!vexpert!mst
From: rorschak@daimi.aau.dk (Jesper Lauridsen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: DROP THE DISCUSSION OF ALIENS ALREADY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Keywords: Don't!
Date: 15 Sep 92 15:23:11 GMT
Organization: Exile Government of Bramming

ummorea0@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Gene Moreau) writes:

>In <1992Sep10.132424.7340@informatik.uni-ulm.de> rschoen@laborixsai.mathematik.uni-ulm.de (Reinhard Schoen) writes:

>>BTW, I am still undetermined....

>How long has it been out? 

A little more than 2 weeks.
-- 
No News is Bad News
From: jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Jim Mann)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Deckard is a replicant?
Date: 14 Sep 92 18:25:16 GMT
Reply-To: jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com

In article <rabjab.95.0@golem.ucsd.edu> rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu (Jeff  
Bytof) writes:
> What evidence is there in the film and the book it's based on that  
Deckard
> is a replicant?  Interesting idea.
> 
AARGH.  Most of the old-time readers of the SF groups (old time ==
more than a year or so) have just covered their heads and hidden
under their desks.

--
Jim Mann            
Stratus Computer   jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com  
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: cmeadows@nyx.cs.du.edu (Chris Meadows)
Subject: Flogging Aliens vs. Flogging Terminator 2
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 92 23:03:24 GMT


Hmmm...if Terminator 2 had this kind of discussion, and it's all died
out by now, I don't think we have to worry...in a few months, the dis-
cussion of the Alien trilogy will be gone by now, too...

(Oops, scratch out the "by now" in that last sentence.  I don't know where
my head is today...)

---Chris Meadows
From: futor@llnl.gov (randy j futor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Startrek VI - the video
Date: 10 Sep 92 19:17:13 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.sf.movies
Organization: CSo @ LLNL


 gt6346c@prism.gatech.EDU (Brian Dalton) wrote:
> . . . other . . . scenes . . .
> 
> The president asked about what if this started a 
> war and the officers response was something kinda silly like 'WE'LL
> KICK THERE AFTERBURNERS` or something equally stupid.

It *was* stupid.  "We'll clean ( ahem ) their chronometers, sir."

__
\/  -+-  randy  -+-  all generalizations are flawed  -+-  futor@llnl.gov
From: Montague_Kevin@Tandem.com (Kevvy Kev)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Plot holes in Alien^3 (*S
Date: 15 Sep 92 22:56:04 GMT
Organization: In Effect Enterprises

Gary Bradley Leaps Headlong Into The Fray, Responding To:

> Glass doesn't shatter after being "damaged by acid."  This is what I meant by
> "seared" through it. . .the acid would just melt a hole through the tube, as
> it did through Kane's helmet.  Recall also that it happened Very quickly in
> the first movie, as the f'hugger attached to Kane. . .but that's a plot hole
> for another time. . .

*    No. There is no evidence that the face hugger melts through Kane's
*helmet quickly. We see Kane looking at the open egg. We hear the screech
*and something propels out. There are a few frames showing it around the
*outside of Kane's helmet, then the scene cuts. The next time we see
*Kane's helmet, the face hugger has melted through it onto his face. But
*this is back on the Nostromo. Lambert and Dallas have carried Kane 2000
*metres and got back on board. There is no evidence it melted through
*very quickly, it had all the time in the world.

It seems to me that it is implicit that it happened with lightning speed.
I had thought it was explicitly shown; in any case consider that it happened
so quickly that Kane, on awakening, didn't know what the heck had happened
to him.  Also, if it hadn't happened quickly Kane would've suffocated, as
the atmosphere was inimical at the time of the first movie.  There are other
cues as to the speed at which it happened, but these were sufficiently overt
that the issue seems clear.

*   And anyway, if people are going to yell plothole about this aspect of
*Alien 3, there is an even larger one in Aliens. How come the 2 face
*huggers don't melt their way out of the tubes they are found in in Med Lab? 

The fact that there is a plothole in 2 doesn't excuse same in 3.  Also: 
there was indeed a huge thread on this subject, before 3 came out.  Consensus
was that the liquid they were floating in neutralized them.  Weak, but
better than nothing. . .which is what we're left with in ^3.

Kevvy Kev
"Hmmm...  do ya think they'd give us a bulk discount if we all went and 
 got a life at the same time?"
   -Guinny
From: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Judge Dredd movie!!!
Date: 15 Sep 92 17:09:28 GMT
Reply-To: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)


   Arnie plays Dredd. Oh no. Just as long as he doesn't take his helmet
off. Also he is too big for Dredd. I always thought that Robert de Nero
would make the perfect JD if he was a bit bigger. Imagine de Niro with a
JD helmet on. Now imagine him him scowl!! Arnie seems a poor second best
now, right?

+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Gary Bradley        |   "You receive a love letter from me and |
| ORACLE Corp, UK     |                  you're f*cked forever!" |
| Edinburgh, SCOTLAND |        - Frank Booth ("Blue Velvet")     |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| "God damn the censor man"                                      |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: mjm3170@zeus.tamu.edu (MATTSON, MATTHEW JUL)
Subject: DROP THE DISCUSSION OF ALIENS ALREADY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 15:19:00 GMT

HOW LONG ARE YOU PEOPLE GOING TO KEEP DISCUSSING THE SAME THREADS
OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER.....

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!

MJM 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: futor@llnl.gov (randy j futor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Stranger in a Strange Land
Date: 14 Sep 92 19:17:50 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.sf.movies
Organization: CSo @ LLNL


 bobc@styx.SanDiego.NCR.com (Robert Crawford) wrote:
> 
> Yes, "Twice Upon A Time" was a movie.  Directed by John Korty and
> Charles Swenson.  George Lucas was executive producer.

Yup, I zoned.

Again.

Sorry.

__
\/  -+-  randy  -+-  all generalizations are flawed  -+-  futor@llnl.gov
From: ckt4x@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Curt Tsui)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: STVI LD version vs. VHS
Date: 8 Sep 92 16:46:37 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

Recently a friend of mine found that the package for the laser
disc version of Star Trek VI has over three minutes of extra
footage, versus the two minutes of the video.  I've seen the
video, but what about the laser disc?  Does anyone know what
the extra minute plus of footage not on the video is?
--
                               - Curt Tsui -
      			     curt@Virginia.EDU
   "Happiness might very well be a glandular condition." - David Cronenberg 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: mtissand@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Michael D Tissandier)
Subject: Re: Who wrote the alien books???
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 20:19:26 GMT

In article <1992Sep8.192412.3581@odin.diku.dk> joker@diku.dk (Morten Christian
Holmgreen) writes:
>Hi.
>
>I think the subject says it all, but anyway. Can somebody please tell
>me who the author of the alien books is and furthermore what the titles
>are.
>

 I believe Alan Dean Foster wrote the novelizations.  The titles are
the same as the movies...

    --Mike

         mtissand@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: dave@blackbox.cc.columbia.edu (David Milner)
Subject: GODZILLA NEWS
Keywords: Godzilla Mothra Japanese Monster
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 05:46:45 GMT

The score for GOJIRA TAI MOSURA has been recorded and is now
being dubbed.




David Milner  Columbia University
inet:   dave@blackbox.cc.columbia.edu
usenet: ...rutgers!columbia!blackbox!dave
        ...rutgers!columbia!blackbox.cc.columbia.edu!dave
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Various stuff RE Alie
From: daniel.moran@pcb.batpad.lgb.ca.us (Daniel Moran) 
Date: 6 Sep 92 17:34:00 GMT
Reply-To: daniel.moran@pcb.batpad.lgb.ca.us (Daniel Moran) 
Distribution: world
Organization: The Batchelor Pad PCBoard ~ Long Beach, CA ~ +1 310 494 8084

TJS107@psuvm.psu.edu (Sime) writes:

SI>(By the way, speaking of cheesy underwater action movies, isn't the guy in
SI> the Abyss the same one in Leviathian? The bald guy who looks like the capti
SI> of the love boat, I mean.)

Watch your tongue, sucker. That's Ed Harris you're referring to, one of
the finest actors of the 20th Century, and the principle reason
"Knightriders" is watchable. :)
                                                                                                                     
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: I think Alien^3 has been flogged to death.
Date: 7 Sep 92 05:57:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


     I've noticed that this newsgroup tends to flog a dead horse until
     all you've got left are bones and hair.  

        re: Alien^3
        ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!

        Let's not make this another Terminator2, shall we?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: Petri.Wessman@hut.fi (Petri Wessman)
Subject: Re: Alien^3: religious and pre-modern
Reply-To: Petri.Wessman@hut.fi
Organization: La Gata Encantada
	<espen.aarseth-050992130518@hdbea.hf-fak.uib.no>
	<5522@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 22:14:07 GMT

On 5 Sep 92 17:03:22 GMT, seawasp@vm2.cis.pitt.edu (Sea Wasp) said:

>as Jeanne d'Arc, 85 as Judas); very pre-modern compared to Aliens's
>post-modernity. Within the obvious limits of Hollywoodian demands,
>its almost unbelievably good.

sw> 	"Bad." The word you are looking for is "bad." It was almost 
sw> unbelievably BAD. 


I myself belong to the "thumbs up" group as regards A^3, but it's
interesting to see the movie generate this amount of disagreement.
People seem to either love it or hate it. Same thing with the critics
here on this side of the Atlantic (A^3 premiered a week ago), some
critics are praising it and some think it's a total piece of shit. A
friend of mine said that she intends to see it just because of the
wide disparity in opinions on it -- movies that everyone agrees on are
usually quite bland.

//Petri
From: joker@diku.dk (Morten Christian Holmgreen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Who wrote the alien books???
Date: 8 Sep 92 19:24:12 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, U of Copenhagen

Hi.

I think the subject says it all, but anyway. Can somebody please tell
me who the author of the alien books is and furthermore what the titles
are.

Thanks...

Christian

-- 
M. Christian Holmgreen / joker@diku.dk / mochmch@uts.uni-c.dk
student, University of Copenhagen, Dept. of Computer Science
"Human errors can only be avoided if one can avoid the use of humans"
From: brigid@geovax.ed.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Query: Unicorn in Blade Runner
Date: 15 Sep 92 09:17:37 GMT
Organization: University of Edinburgh, Geography Department.

If this new director's cut of Blade Runner contains the dream
sequence with the unicorn, can anyone tell me if these shots
were unused footage filmed for the original or were they filmed 
specially for this version? 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: andyr@wizzy.com (Andy Rabagliati)
Subject: Looking for Australian version of Mad Max ..
Followup-To: poster
Organization: W. Z. I.
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 19:17:29 GMT

Posting for a friend of mine ..

I am looking for the Video Mad Max, with Mel Gibson,
a Kennedy / Miller production.

The US version is dubbed (ugh!) in American.

Where can I get the original?

If it is only available Down Under, and someone can get it/mail it,
(will pay, naturally) please contact me.

BTW - I get my NewsFeed via AT&T and UUnet - so it does not include
this group, as I have to pay :-(. Please *MAIL* replies.

Sorry for any breaches of Netiquette .. thanks a ton.

Cheers,   Andy.


-- 
andyr@wizzy.com  Andy Rabagliati, RR1 Box 33, Wyalusing, PA 18853 (717)746-7780
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies