HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: Hail to the Redskins
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 17:58:02 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

> 
>>Congratulations Art Monk !!!
> 
> Definitely, though I was kinda irked that the rookie back (Green?) made
> that nice run at the end of the game to put the Skins on the goal line,
> and Gibbs sits on the ball instead of letting the guy try to take it in
> and get himself his first NFL touchdown.
> 
> Steve Mansfield                   Junior AlterNet Engineer 
> smm@uunet.uu.net                  uunet!smm

             I think Coach Gibbs was showing some class. Besides, if the
two teams play against each other in the near future that would be just
what the broncos need to get fired up.

                                 -doug THE dolfan-
From: twolf@cs.utah.edu (Tom Wolf)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Wild cards
Date: 16 Oct 92 22:33:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: hellgate.1992Oct16.163337.19621
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept

In article <1992Oct16.201111.15136@ncar.ucar.edu> gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) writes:
>tw> Tom Wolf
>
>tw> I still think something is wrong with the playoff system. I don't like the
>    conference-division setup. It allows teams with poorer records to get into
>    the playoffs and leads to fans saying my conference is better than yours.
>    Just take the top 16 teams and have them slug it out.
>
>  So how do you schedule games, if divisions and conferences don't exist? A
>  27-game season? The team with the most remaining uninjured players wins?
>

Sounds good to me! I might get enough football viewing in then. That's the
way the world sport of soccer is done in many countries, such as England.

Tom Wolf
From: ded@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu (nod sivad)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Don't give up on the Bills.
Date: 12 Oct 92 19:28:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: aplcen.1992Oct12.192835.23869
Reply-To: ded@aplcen (nod sivad)
Organization: Johns Hopkins University

>I feel really sorry for the Raiders secondary after the whupping they shall
>occur on Sunday.  The Bills have a history of having a bad defeat followed by
>a severe thumping of the following opponent (does anyone remember the merciful
>42-6 win over Indianapolis last year?).  
>

And don't you feel silly now?


>FROM AN AVID BILLS FAN (I.E. i LIVE AND DIE BY THEM)

Rest in peace.

					me
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Date: Thursday, 15 Oct 1992 12:18:39 PST
From: <TOM@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: NFL PICKS week #7

Can you post your results from week #6!
Organization: Freshman, MCS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
From:  ()
Subject: Re: Best In Tejas
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Rice University
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 15:47:56 GMT

In article <1992Oct16.033734.10322@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>,
c164-eh@po.berkeley.edu (William Hackett) wrote:
> 
> Well, Well, Well the Boy's are back it seems but Im not sure
> which Boy's these are the Dallas Cowboys or is it Miami Cowboys
> Or maybe its the Arkansas Cowboys, Gosh do we always have to have
> some Arkansain come fix up a Texas mess... 
> 
> How can these Boy's be the best in football I mean there good and 
> all that but they haven't even proven best in Tejas yet!!!
> 
> How many times have Oilers beaten the Boy's in a row, they did last
> year in Preseason and during the regular year and also this year
> not once but twice in Pre-season.. Oilers are BEST in TEJAS and
> in AFC central.. and AFC and NFL.. Boy's will be Boy's but they
> should come in nicely at second place a only show once again that
> They aren't Best in Tejas... 
> 
    Yeah, wouldn't it be interesting to see Dallas play Houston in the
big game (O.K., a real long shot, I admit).  I suppose the networks 
wouldn't be too happy (too 'regional' a matchup), but it would add another
silly 'first' to the recordbooks (first intrastate Superbowl).  
From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 16:19:27 GMT
Subject: Re: 49ers/Rams
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro

This game confirmed my earlier suspicion - the 9ers can be had by a team
with a good passing game.  The Bills and Rams are proof of this.

I think the 9ers will win the west.  How far they go in the playoffs will
depend on how good the opponent passing game is.  This team might have an
easier game against a team like the Eagles (average air attack) than a team
like the Dolphins simply because the secondary seems to be the weak link.

************************************************
* Donald Boell - Hewlett Packard               *
*                                              *
* When you're chewing on life's gristle        *
* Don't grumble, give a whistle - Monty Python *
*                                 Life of Brian*
************************************************
From: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM (Bennet Ih - Sun BOS Hardware - Sunergy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Amazin' D or Inept O?
Date: 8 Oct 92 19:54:21 GMT
Reply-To: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc. - BDC
NNTP-Posting-Host: mowgli.east.sun.com

A lot of the postings flying back and forth between the Eagles and Cowboys 
camps seems to center around if the Eagles D made the Cowboys offense
look bad or if the Cowboys offense made itself look bad. 

Just my $0.02 worth to this discussion: One game does not provide enough
evidence by itself to make a strong conclusion. However, over the past few 
years, the Eagles D has made a lot of teams offensive units look REAL bad.
Any team can catch a lucky break every now and then on a tipped pass or a 
fumble that bounces the right way. But since the Eagles ALWAYS seem to
come up with these plays I would tend to think that there is more than just
luck involved. 

In other words, some teams wait for good things to happen. The Eagles seem
to be able to MAKE good things happen.

-Bennet
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jason@cray.com (Jason Parker)
Subject: Re: Steve Jordan INJ Update
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 14 Oct 92 14:45:28 CDT

In article <1992Oct13.124845.19646@unislc.uucp>, jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske) writes:
> 
> jason@cray.com (Jason Parker) writes:
> 
> >morning.  Tice and Noveselsky will play.  I didn't catch who
> 
> I believe that Tice is definitely out with a broken bone in his lower
> back.  The StarTribune says that Danta Whitaker will start at tight
> end, and Brent Novoselsky is expected to play when the team uses two
> tight ends, which is usually 50 percent of the time.
> Jordan should be ready for the Oct. 25 game against Washington. 
> 
> John Ganske
> 

Yes, you're right Tice is out.  However, Coach Green said this morning that
"Novoselsky will play in place of Steve Jordan".

But that is just what I heard.  We'll see.

Jason
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: a750288@pan.mc.ti.com (John E. Brennan)
Subject: Patriots News 10/16
Keywords: Millen  out
Organization: Texas Instruments Materials and Controls Group
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 13:20:46 GMT


Patriots News 10/16

The report on the news last night is that Hugh Millen will sit out Sunday's
game against the Dolphins.  Tom Hodson will start.

I haven't heard any specifics about Marv Cook's status.  I don't believe
his injury was too serious, so my >guess< would be that he will play 
Sunday.  If anybody has more accurate info, please speak up....

There's also been rumors for a while now that the Patriots will be going
sometime in the future, probably to St. Louis.  I've got some questions
on that:

1.  To Patriots fans in NE: how much stock do you put in these rumors, and
what are your feelings about NE losing the Pats?

2.  To people in the St. Louis area:  have you been hearing similar rumors,
and would you want the Patriots?

Please post or e-mail your replies.  Thanks!

Take Care,
 
John 



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            
John Brennan 

a750288@pan.mc.ti.com 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: toma@db.TC.Cornell.EDU (Rory Toma)
Subject: Re: Vikings vs Bears
Organization: Not bloody likely around here!
	<1992Oct6.214637.13724@news.iastate.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 09:38:25 GMT


  This is not meant as a flame, but more of a general question/comment.  Most
  back-up quarterbacks are there for a reason, either very inexperienced, i.e.
  a rookie, or in general less talented than the starter.  I know Gannon was 
  pretty rough around the edges as far as his rookie year, but posessed a great
  deal of athletic ability.  I am wondering how many other cases exist of a 
  back-up coming in, after a number of years as second-string, and becoming a 
  good and/or great player?  This is a similar question to that of baseball,
  where a player never really gains much from longer periods of experience
  but, on average, never really changes much in terms of ability.  In
  other words, once average=always average.  Obviously there are many factors
  that are different between the two games, not the least of which is number of
  games played before players reach the professional level.  But does a player
  who has been more-or-less average over his time as a professional football 
  player really have a chance to improve?  If I were a betting man, I would 
  say "no".

Yep, Young, Bono, Danny White, Peete, Jeff Hostetle... They are all just 
average, and never (will) amount to anything.
--
toma@tc.cornell.edu - Rory Toma

Opinionated and tunnel-visioned? Darn right. But then, my employer really
doesn't know what I'm talking about anyway...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: blah@maas-neotek.arc.nasa.gov (TWF)
Subject: Denver (and a Montana note)
Organization: NASA/ARC Information Sciences Division
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 17:48:50 GMT

Well, I don't like Elway, and I hate Washington, so you can be assured
this is objective...

I watched almost the entire Denver/Washington game last night, adn I
cannot believe how bad Denver is.  Yes, their offensive line isn't
good, but..

where the hell are the receivers?  Elway had time to release before
almost every sack, but no one was open?  Nothing against Mr. Sharpe,
but throwing to the tight end almost exclusively doesn't seem like the
Denver (and John Elway) offense that I'm used to seeing.  Any Denver
fans/haters out there who can shed some insight on this?

Just a quick note from today's (10/13/92) Boston Globe:

Joe Montana is reported to have lost feeling in the "lower two
fingers" of his throwing hand (not really sure which fingers are the
"lower two").


Mark


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chris@lightnin.Columbia.NCR.COM ()
Subject: Re: SECRET INSIDE  OPEN LEAGUE
Organization: NCR Corp, E&M-Columbia, Columbia, SC
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 20:07:39 GMT

In article <26374@oasys.dt.navy.mil> swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Steve Williams) writes:
>In rec.sport.football.pro, alb2001@andy.bgsu.edu (Alvino Battistoni) writes:
> >
> >        I am from Buffalo and I am kind of a BILLS fan....
>
> 
>     stuff deleted
>
> >PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR INSIGHTS!
>
>BILLS will lose again this weekend!  :-)
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Williams                           swilliam@oasys.dt.navy.mil
>---------------------------------------------------------------------

  INSIGHT:  Bills aren't playing this weekend!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Eagles : YIKES!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 15:19:54 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.065833.24325@seq.uncwil.edu> rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith) writes:
>jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>>           ... Coach Seifert came right in and won a SB. Coach Seifert, 
>>currently has the highest winning perctange of any coach. 
>
>   I will just say this: Sieferts winning % = .788 (41-11)
>                    Dennis Greens winning % = .800 (4-1)
>
>   Care to retract your statement, or will you now qualify it? Damn it...
>Can you just once post an article where even part of your argument has
>its basis in truth/fact? YOUR opinions are not fact!
>
>   This is probably my 6th or 7th post in this thread where I have
>put numbers in your face that belie what you say... are you going to
>learn soon and get your shit together before spouting off again, or will
>I need to keep correcting you?

Well, he is not going to learn. When we throw his lies back to his face,
he will either 

1) wimp out by not responding to it, or
2) chicken out by saying he put up the lies just test us ....

No wonder that I suspect John Gloria is really Gloria John, i.e. not a man.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
From: grundusk@sunflare.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Kevin Grunduski)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: eagles
Date: 12 Oct 92 17:12:40 GMT
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center

Everybody is so high on the eagles ... how many playoff games have they won in 
the last 3 years? The regular season doesn't mean squat if you can't get it done
when it counts.
From: jamestyu@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Ferrell Edmunds (Dolphins)
Date: 13 Oct 92 17:50:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: ut-emx.81608
Reply-To: jamestyu@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu ()

About keeping Edmunds, it'd be nice in an ideal world, but it's doubtful
that a team can keep 2 high quality TE's especially in Miami's pass
offense.  Besides, at the moment, he's a highly marketable commodity and
Miami could pick up some needed defensive help.

PS: Miami won't go 16-0, but could very easily be 13-3 and with the
Buff's latest loss, win the division easily...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood)
Subject: POOL - Picks for Week #6 -- NOTE WEIGHTS (REPOST)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 22:14:13 GMT

Week 6
------

PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK THE FORM BEFORE MAILING IT!

Mail this form to davewood@cs.colorado.edu with the word "picks" in the
subject line.  Be sure to choose one and only one team for each game.  Mark
your choice with an 'x' in the appropriate box.  Put your initials after the
word "Initials:" (ON THE SAME LINE!) at the bottom of the form.  If you have
questions about this form, send them with the subject "fbproblem."  If you
still need to sign up, YOU MUST SEND A SEPARATE MESSAGE with the word
"signup" in the subject line.  Do not reply to this message unless it is to
send in your picks.  See the Rules/Signup post for more information.

WEIGHTS: Assign 10 points to 4 different games.
	 Assign  7 points to 5 different games.
	 Assign  5 points to 2 different games.
	 You get 15 points for free since there are only 11 games.

This form is due at 10 am PST (5 pm GMT) on Sunday, Oct 11.  NO EXCEPTIONS!

DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE!

 WT  Away                       Home
*------------------------------------------------*
[  ] [ ] Atlanta		[ ] Miami            
[  ] [ ] Philadelphia		[ ] Kansas City 
[  ] [ ] Phoenix		[ ] NY Giants        
[  ] [ ] San Francisco		[ ] New England
[  ] [ ] Pittsburgh		[ ] Cleveland     
[  ] [ ] Seattle		[ ] Dallas           
[  ] [ ] NY Jets		[ ] Indianapolis     
[  ] [ ] Buffalo		[ ] LA Raiders       
[  ] [ ] Houston		[ ] Cincinnati       
[  ] [ ] LA Rams		[ ] New Orleans      
[  ] [ ] Denver			[ ] Washington        
                               
Initials: 

DID YOU PUT YOUR INITIALS ON THE SAME LINE AS THE WORD INITIALS???  PLEASE DO!

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Rex Wood -- davewood@cs.colorado.edu -- University of Colorado at Boulder
  BRONCOS!!        R.S.F.P. Internet Football Pool Organizer        BRONCOS!!
                            Owner, Boulder Houlders
From: elm@cs.berkeley.edu (ethan miller)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: JGH computer rankings - week 7
Date: 13 Oct 92 15:02:26
Organization: Berkeley--Shaken, not Stirred
Reply-To: elm@cs.berkeley.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: terrorism.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu's message of 13 OCT 92 13:28:36    

In article <1992Oct13.182717.25492@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
=>Here are my program's ratings after week 6.  Note that the Dolphins
=>and Eagles are actually tied for first.  Broncos have dropped out
=>of the top 10.  Also, while 4 of the top ten teams are AFC (pretty
=>even) 7 of the bottom 10 are also AFC.
=>
=> 1 Dolphins       85
=> 2 Eagles         85
=> 3 Cowboys        82
=> 4 49ers          81
=> 5 Saints         80
=> 6 Redskins       77
=> 7 Chiefs         75
=> 8 Oilers         73
=> 9 Vikings        68
=>10 Bills          65

Note, however, that 5 of the top 6 are from the NFC.  This is hardly
what I'd call even.

ethan
--
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
ethan miller--cs grad student   | "Anybody not wearing 2000000 sunblock's
elm@cs.berkeley.edu             |  gonna have a REALLY bad day.  GET IT?"
#include <std/disclaimer.h>     |  -- Sarah Connor, _Terminator 2_
From: grantham@beirut.berkeley.edu (Jon Grantham)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Redskins' OL woes
Date: 16 Oct 92 02:05:00 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Math. Department.
NNTP-Posting-Host: beirut.berkeley.edu

grantham@beirut.berkeley.edu (Jon Grantham) wrote:

>I heard something about the Redskins signing the Jets' 1992 first round
>draft pick (an offensive lineman) as a backup maybe yesterday.  Can anyone
>provide details?
 
 
Arrgh!  I meant the 1986 draft choice.  Sorry.
 
Jon
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gogo@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (donald.gogolin)
Subject: Re: Teams of the Decade and 4 team divisions
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Distribution: bl
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 13:37:02 GMT
Keywords: hmmm

In article <1bj2pcINNaij@agate.berkeley.edu>, sortland@soda.berkeley.edu (Stefan Sortland) writes:
> 
> 	So, the Steelers are the "Team of the 70's"
> 	    the 49ers are the "Team of the 80's"
> 
> 	Common denomenator? Both played in 4 team divisions..
> 
> 	Anyone think that playing in a 4 team division,
> 	with fewer division rivals to worry about makes
> 	for sizable advantage for a team???
> 
> 	I probably am not the first to notice this, but what
> 	do people make of this?
> 
No.  This doesn't hold any water at all.  What would that have to
do with it?
The fact remains, they still have to 1) play well during the season
2) win the conference  3) win the Super Bowl.
Where's the advantage???
I think these two teams were flat out better than the rest.  It had
nothing to do with who else was in their division.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: current League Stats Please
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 22:01:28 GMT

In article <Adriene_Nazaretian.71.718978594@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Go GIANTS!) writes:
>In article <1992Oct12.184102.16258@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>
>>>>In article <Adriene_Nazaretian.63.718897011@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Go GIANTS!) writes:
>>>>>Would someone with some time on their hands please post the current NFL 
>>>>>standings after monday's game.  Thnx 
>>>>>Adriene L. Nazaretian        
>>>>>Yale University              
>>>>>ADRIENE@YALEADS.BITNET        
>>>>>ADRIENE@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU  
>>>
>
>Thanks for the FAX.
>
>>>>NINERS WIN THE SB! :-)  Ok, Adriene, wanna make a bet that
>>>>the Niners will make it to the SB and the Giants will not?
>>>>-- 
>>>
>>>Geez, I said I was a Giants FAN, I'm realistic, NOT STUPID or that 
>>>bullheaded...  
>>>
>>>I will betcha the 9ers WONT make it to the SB this year, PERIOD.
>>>  
>>>Hmmm what could we bet....
>>>What could YOU have that I would want.... hmmmm
>>>
>>How about a brand new Sparc 2 with 32MB memory,
>>424MB hard drive, color of course. You will then have
>>a REAL UNIX WORKSTATION just like mine. :-) No, only
>>kidding, I would never bet my SPARC 2 away. :-)
>
>>Besides my SPARC 2, this 6'3", 225lb, dark, handsome guy probably
>>does not have anything you would want. :-)
>
>oooooh, just my type....
>But then again so is the Sparc! Yikes, I'm not sure which offer to drool 
>over ;-)  But let me guess, you're either married, gay, or HIV positive.  
>Just kidding! What do you say we move this over to alt.sex.BONDAGE!
>
I love they way you type "oooooh", made me drool. :-)
Oh, you are wrong on all three counts. Does having a vascetomy give
me extra points?  :-)
>
>I still have some good suggestions coming in for the bet. 
>The best one being that the loser must take a picture of themselves in their 
>favorite team jersey without pants on, yes in their underwear, with a banner 
>over their head admitting they were WRONG.  The picture must then be scanned 
>in, encoded and sent to this list for all to see.
>
>Still want to bet?  The Niners are winning, but very unconvincing wins...
>Think about it.
>
>Adriene L. Nazaretian        
>Yale University              
>ADRIENE@YALEADS.BITNET        
>ADRIENE@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU  

Damn Woman, you drive a hard bet there!  I will certainly have to
think about that one. :-)
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
"I do not think that winning is the most important thing. 
I think winning is the only thing."    - Bill Veeck
From: amr2@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ANTHONY MICHAEL RUTCH)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Steelers rest of schedule......
Date: 16 Oct 92 03:12:22 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

Wins                 Maybe's
Cincinnatti(2)       Minnesota
Cleveland            Houston
Seattle              Indianapolis
                     Detroit
                     Chicago

                     Losses
                     K.C.
                     Buffalo

Wins:  4-0
Maybe's:  3-2
Losses: 0-2
Now: 3-2

10-6 overalll
-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Rutch                      Major:  Material Science & Engineering
Brodhead 504                    Campus Box: D-150
758-1393                        Status: JR1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: fierro@uts.amdahl.com (Doug Fierro)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dolphins vs. Raiders
Date: 12 Oct 92 18:09:59 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

>In article <1992Oct8.162506.18073@ntmtv>, weitzeka@ntmtv.UUCP (Keith Weitzel) writes:
>> In article <Bvs8u8.JxI@acsu.buffalo.edu> v130pwbq@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
>>>Here is the Miami Dolphin schedule. Along side each game a have placed a number.
>>>1 - should have no problem winning, 2 - should win/could be close,
>>>D 14 LA Raiders       (1) 
>> 
>>    The Raiders on Monday night and Miami is going to win with no
>> problems? I don't think so.  The Raiders have the Dolphins number.
>> I cannot remember when the last time that the Dolphins beat the
>> Raiders in regular season.  The Raiders are always tough on
>> Monday night.  Hopefully, the Dolphins will do as you and look
>> past the Raiders, then the Raiders will go to Maimi and crush
>> the unexpecting Dolphans.
>> 
>> A die hard Raider fan
>> I bleed silver and black

  This is true- Miami has the worst time against the Raiders for some
unknown reason- doesn't matter if they play them at home or away, or what
the records of each team are.

  However, Miami has an impressive Monday night record, and they are at
their best that I have seen them in a while- since the 1984 season?

  December 14th will be a game to watch!!!

  BTW, I HATE THE RAIDERS!!! :-)

  Doug
-- 
                                                     Doug Fierro
                                      |\             UTS System Software
  O                         __________|_\______      CASE tools development
  \_.______________________| * * * * * * * * */      fierro@uts.amdahl.com
 __\____                   |=================/       (408)746-7102
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro