HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
Subject: Auto-Fellatio (Re: Heterosexual Exploitation of Homosexuality?)
Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 12:30:31 GMT


In article <1992Apr12.112714.13193@news.unomaha.edu>
ACM022@Zeus.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance) writes:

Am I the only person around here who knows how to edit a
header Subject: line?  Or do I just fail to notice when
someone else does it?  In any case I think it would be great
if people did it when they went off on some sort of tangent.

In this case, I've always thought the medical/technical
terms for sex-related things were vaguely ridiculous, though
in the present case, the term does seem economical.

>In <3347@daily-planet.concordia.ca>
>gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca writes:

>>In article <1992Apr10.150136.12620@cs.hw.ac.uk>
>>wells@cs.hw.ac.uk (Francis Wells) writes:

>>>1 in ten pubescent males in western culture attempt to
>>>"eat" their dicks.

>Where do they get these statistics, anyway?  Why is it so
>rare?

This particular statistic seems ridiculously low.  When I
was a kid, everybody (the boys, naturally) tried it.

>>I suckseeded. Just had to find out what it was like...

>Are you implying that you were able, but didn't continue to
>do so?  Why would you stop?

Have you really tried this?  The position is something
of a strain.

>It's limbering, saves cleanup time, keeps one in practice,
>and it's great fun too.  Of course, it is a pretty odd
>position to get into, but then that's sex for you.

Speaking as one who threw his back out yesterday slinging
50# bags of bird feed and an 80# bag of kitty litter around
and now is in terrible pain, even the idea of doing this
is preposterous.  But it has been less so at other times.

>J, who is talking purely from speculation, of course.

Two guys I ran around with in high school (you can see
why) could do it easy as pie, just bent right over and
plopped it in their mouths.  They were quite willing to
demonstrate too.

-- 
Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin
Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson
NeXTmail w/attachments: anderson@yak.macc.wisc.edu  Bitnet: anderson@wiscmacc
Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: CT.A81@forsythe.stanford.edu (LFRibeiro)
Subject: domestic partners in l.a.
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 00:21:00 GMT

anybody out there know about domestic partner laws? is anywhere in
the l.a. area really advanced and in the books? reply to -
comly@acropolis.stanford.edu. thanks, lfr
From: markm@ogicse.ogi.edu (Mark Morrissey)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: outing the stars
Date: 14 Apr 92 20:45:15 GMT
Organization: Oregon Graduate Institute (formerly OGC), Beaverton, OR

>Tsilke, who thinks Widmer Heffewiesen tops Ballard Bitter any time
>(two, two, two threads in one...).

Tsilke, Tsilke, Tsilke...  Say it isn't so.  We're beer-crossed.  You
in Seattle with Independent Ales (they make Ballard Bitters, among others)
and me down here with Widmer.  However, I have Bridgeport and Rogue River
to keep me satisfied.  I should point out, however, that in the microbrew
crowd down here, Heffewiesen is refered to as "near beer".  Anything that
they throw half a lemon into can't be all that good.  ;-)

--mark
From: Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Deletions
Date: 5 Apr 92 22:09:50 GMT
  <56897@cup.portal.com> <lwmj27q.jfh@netcom.com>
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

Frank Swilling writes:
>>>In the meanwhile, I for one am paying for every word I download from the
>>>Net, and I don't appreciate having to pay for so much garbage.
>
>>Don't download the garbage.
>
>I have no choice.  It's all or nothing on Portal.  If I subscribe to
>soc.motss, I have to take everything in soc.motss.

Maybe, but Portal is a flat-rate system. It doesn't cost you any
more to read an hour's worth of news than 10 minutes worth of
news.  You can quite reasonably complain that these morons are
wasting your time, since Portal doesn't have "kill" files, but
you *can't* argue that they're wasting your money.

 
() I may be synthetic, but I'm _not_ stupid.
()      -- Bishop (from Aliens)
-----
[George D. Madison, a/k/a Furr | 8-{)##] | NBCS:B8f+t+w-e+s+k+a!cv PIG 8/7]
[> furr@cup.portal.com <#> It's a BEAR thing -- you wouldn't understand. <]
Newsgroups: soc.misc
From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
Subject: Re: Redux: FAGGOTS ON PARADE!
Organization: insert anything here
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 13:31:52 GMT

In article <2079@uswnvg.UUCP> dfpedro@uswnvg.UUCP.UUCP (Donn F. Pedro) writes:
>farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Big Bri) writes:
>>Artimus@TCRS.COM writes:

>>>THIS IS WONDERFUL!
>>Artimus is back, big fucking deal. I wonder if he actually reads the follow
>>ups to his posts.

>I wonder if anyone actually reads the followups to his posts.

	What posts?  :-)

BBC
Newsgroups: soc.misc
From: S7985203@deimos.ucc.umass.edu ( )
Subject: Re: KILLING DOGS & CATS THAT TRESPASS ON MY PROPERTY
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 19:36:25 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20

In <WHITLOCK.39@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu> WHITLOCK@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu writes:
 
> I could buy your argument as it applies to "wild" (non-domesticated) 
> animals. It simply does not hold with animals that are "owned". In effect, 
> they are the property of their owners and as such, the responsibility under 
> all U.S. tort law with which I am familiar, of said owner. I'm sure that if 
> I happened to be able to "catch" the perpetrating beasties "in flagranti 
> delecti" I could call a dog and/or cat catcher and have the varmints 
> removed. My problem is that the episodes are (to my knowledge) relatively 
> infrequent (but no less outrageous to my sense of personal property rights). 
> No "catcher" will remain vigilantly posted in my yard, and the critters are, 
> frankly, too damn fast. 
> 
> I'd prefer them dead, on principle --- they need to be punished for the 
> trespassing they have already done --- but I's settle for their permanent 
> removal from the property. Notice that I haven't suggested a guerilla 
> revenge campaign against the owners of the offending creatures. Since 
> animals do not yet, thank goodness, have any rights under the law in our 
> fair country, by rights I should take the owners to court. Again, a problem. 
> I don't have the time for all that --- and ---I'd ruin my reputation as a 
> model neighbor. Far preferable would be the complete (but mysterious) 
> disappearance of said unwanted interlopers. HOW TO DO IT. THAT's my question.
> 
> C'mon Christy, won't you help ???
> 
> Reid


C'mon Reid!  Animals need to be punished for trespassing?  PLEASE!  I haven't
met an animal yet who understood what that meant.  "Gee, Rover, see that grass
over there? Don't walk on it!"
I honestly don't think Rover will understand what I'm saying.  Sure, animals
are smart to a point.  But so far I haven't met one that understands that much
English.  Give the poor things a break!
It's true that they shouldn't be on your property.  The owners should not let
them outside if their not going to be tied up or behind a fence (but understand
it's necessary for the animals to be let outside.  They need the fresh air to
remain healthy).  So, you're only solutions are to either talk to the owners
and ask them to do something or put up a fence yourself!  I know, that's
exactly what you didn't want to hear because it's a 'humanitarian' response. 
Well, I'm proud to say that I'm a humanitarian.  You can't blame the dogs for
walking on your property.  So, punishing the animals would be fruitless.  Go to 
the owners and leave the poor animals alone!

Christy
Newsgroups: soc.misc
From: S7985203@deimos.ucc.umass.edu ( )
Newsgroups: soc.misc
Subject: Re: KILLING DOGS & CATS THAT TRESPASS ON MY PROPERTY
Date: 8 Apr 92 19:41:09 GMT
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20

In <WHITLOCK.29@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu> WHITLOCK@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu writes:

> I live in a "subdivision" where the minimum plot size is 5 acres. My 
> neighbors have animals that they permit to roam freely. This means that 
> occasionally, said animals "trespass" onto my land. 
> 
> If it were a child, there would surely be some law against laying traps or 
> having purposely poisoned toys lying around the property to eliminate the 
> child trespasser. My question is whether ther are legal obstacles to my 
> laying traps, snares, poisoned food, etc... to get rid of these trespassing 
> animals.
> 
> I am not particularly interested in humanitarian responses from 
> respondents ("why don't you just talk it over with the owners of the 
> animals...").
> 
> I need a swift, untraceable solution that will eliminate the varmints once 
> and for all. Thanks for your help !
> 
> Reid Whitlock
> whitlockr@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu



Well REID, you're a sweet loving person.  I can tell.  

Anyone who would want to kill an animal just because it walked on some grass
must have some serious psychological problems.  Maybe you should seek some
therapy, REID.  It sounds to me like you need it bad.

I'd hate to live in your neighborhood....maybe I should warn your neighbors
about your bratty and immature attitude....
From: WHITLOCK@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu (Reid E. Whitlock)
Newsgroups: soc.misc
Subject: Re: KILLING DOGS & CATS THAT TRESPASS ON MY PROPERTY
Date: 9 Apr 92 00:46:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: vaxb.WHITLOCK.35
Organization: Darden Center, University of Virginia

In article <1992Apr8.194109.6793@nic.umass.edu> S7985203@deimos.ucc.umass.edu ( ) writes:
>In <WHITLOCK.29@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu> WHITLOCK@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu writes:

>> I live in a "subdivision" where the minimum plot size is 5 acres. My 
>> neighbors have animals that they permit to roam freely. This means that 
>> occasionally, said animals "trespass" onto my land. 
>> 
>> If it were a child, there would surely be some law against laying traps or 
>> having purposely poisoned toys lying around the property to eliminate the 
>> child trespasser. My question is whether ther are legal obstacles to my 
>> laying traps, snares, poisoned food, etc... to get rid of these trespassing 
>> animals.
>> 
>> I am not particularly interested in humanitarian responses from 
>> respondents ("why don't you just talk it over with the owners of the 
>> animals...").
>> 
>> I need a swift, untraceable solution that will eliminate the varmints once 
>> and for all. Thanks for your help !
>> 
>> Reid Whitlock
>> whitlockr@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu



>Well REID, you're a sweet loving person.  I can tell.  

>Anyone who would want to kill an animal just because it walked on some grass
>must have some serious psychological problems.  Maybe you should seek some
>therapy, REID.  It sounds to me like you need it bad.

>I'd hate to live in your neighborhood....maybe I should warn your neighbors
>about your bratty and immature attitude....

It's not just ***SOME*** grass they walk on it's **MINE***. Thta's what 
private property is all about. Ownership. Remember "a man's home is his 
castle"? It's the only place where, within certain limits, I can basically 
do what I want --- determine my own environment. What I want!!! is an animal-
free environment. What I also want is some suggestions on how to achieve 
this. I did not ask for therapy from you nor recommendations that I seek it 
elsewhere, thank you very much.

Reid
Newsgroups: soc.misc
From: puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com (Software Dude)
Subject: Re: KILLING DOGS & CATS THAT TRESPASS ON MY PROPERTY
Organization: WHAT?
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:18:15 GMT

> It's the only place where, within certain limits, I can basically 
>do what I want --- determine my own environment. What I want!!!

Uh, within certain limits, Reid. Ever hear of the ASPCA? ever hear 
of animal right's activists stepping in to keep Mr. Company from
damaging said turtle/snake/whatever? You're stepping on the same
boundary here. If you are caught killing an animal for no other reason
than "it walked on my grass", you better check local and state laws to
see if you ACTUALLY cam do what you say you want to do.
--
Puter		puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com		Go UofL Cardinals!
Xref: sparky soc.misc:415 alt.flame:6232 alt.politics.homosexuality:1739 alt.activism:7252 soc.motss:19295
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Newsgroups: soc.misc,alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.activism,soc.motss
Subject: Re: TSK TSK TSK... Bad little swishies!
Date: 4 Apr 92 16:00:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: amhux2.1992Apr4.160016.7707
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA

In article <1992Apr3.155532.10955@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> golds_ss@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Stuart S Goldstone) writes:

>	I know this is one of Artimus's recycled messages, but I was
>wondering if anyone could give me the 800 number in question?  Is it active,
>or was it just another lie?  I am more than willing to incur the "reciprocal
>action" Artimus mentions...

As am I.  However, Artimus has never posted the 800 number of which he
speaks, and he's never posted with a valid e-mail address, so it is
impossible for people who have only read his postings to have called
it.  Yes, it's just another lie.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Well, I've never been to heaven / but
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  I've been to Oklahoma ..."
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /    -- Three Dog Night
From: WHITLOCK@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu (Reid E. Whitlock)
Subject: KILLING DOGS & CATS THAT TRESPASS ON MY PROPERTY
Keywords: Trespassing, Legal Recourse, Dogs, Legal Liability, Cats
Organization: Darden Center, University of Virginia
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 02:09:19 GMT

I live in a "subdivision" where the minimum plot size is 5 acres. My 
neighbors have animals that they permit to roam freely. This means that 
occasionally, said animals "trespass" onto my land. 

If it were a child, there would surely be some law against laying traps or 
having purposely poisoned toys lying around the property to eliminate the 
child trespasser. My question is whether ther are legal obstacles to my 
laying traps, snares, poisoned food, etc... to get rid of these trespassing 
animals.

I am not particularly interested in humanitarian responses from 
respondents ("why don't you just talk it over with the owners of the 
animals...").

I need a swift, untraceable solution that will eliminate the varmints once 
and for all. Thanks for your help !

Reid Whitlock
whitlockr@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu
Newsgroups: soc.misc
From: WHITLOCK@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu (Reid E. Whitlock)
Subject: Re: KILLING DOGS & CATS THAT TRESPASS ON MY PROPERTY
Organization: Darden Center, University of Virginia
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 04:05:16 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.235544.17777@nic.umass.edu> S7985203@deimos.ucc.umass.edu ( ) writes:

> 
>> It's not just ***SOME*** grass they walk on it's **MINE***. Thta's what 
>> private property is all about. Ownership. Remember "a man's home is his 
>> castle"? It's the only place where, within certain limits, I can basically 
>> do what I want --- determine my own environment. What I want!!! is an animal-
>> free environment. What I also want is some suggestions on how to achieve 
>> this. I did not ask for therapy from you nor recommendations that I seek it 
>> elsewhere, thank you very much.
>> 
>> Reid


>I don't think there is such a place as an animal free environment.  At least I
>haven't found one yet.  Animals are everywhere and it is their land as much as
>it is ours.  If you haven't noticed, animals are a part of our culture.  They
>are protection, security, and yes, even "man's best friend".   You try to kill 
>one of them and you'll probably have a nice law suit on your hands - not to
>mention disrupt peace in your neighborhood.

>Christy

I could buy your argument as it applies to "wild" (non-domesticated) 
animals. It simply does not hold with animals that are "owned". In effect, 
they are the property of their owners and as such, the responsibility under 
all U.S. tort law with which I am familiar, of said owner. I'm sure that if 
I happened to be able to "catch" the perpetrating beasties "in flagranti 
delecti" I could call a dog and/or cat catcher and have the varmints 
removed. My problem is that the episodes are (to my knowledge) relatively 
infrequent (but no less outrageous to my sense of personal property rights). 
No "catcher" will remain vigilantly posted in my yard, and the critters are, 
frankly, too damn fast. 

I'd prefer them dead, on principle --- they need to be punished for the 
trespassing they have already done --- but I's settle for their permanent 
removal from the property. Notice that I haven't suggested a guerilla 
revenge campaign against the owners of the offending creatures. Since 
animals do not yet, thank goodness, have any rights under the law in our 
fair country, by rights I should take the owners to court. Again, a problem. 
I don't have the time for all that --- and ---I'd ruin my reputation as a 
model neighbor. Far preferable would be the complete (but mysterious) 
disappearance of said unwanted interlopers. HOW TO DO IT. THAT's my question.

C'mon Christy, won't you help ???

Reid
Newsgroups: soc.misc
From: bn566@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Ward Chanley)
Subject: Re: Redux: FAGGOTS ON PARADE!
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 01:36:14 GMT


Doll, you really need to get f*cked.
-- 
"Imagine a war in which everyone won..."
Pet Shop Boys, "DJ Culture"
-----------------------------------------
Ward Chanley - bn566@cleveland.freenet.edu
From: steveb@cernvax.cern.ch (Steve Bougerolle)
Newsgroups: soc.misc
Subject: Re: KILLING DOGS & CATS THAT TRESPASS ON MY PROPERTY
Date: 9 Apr 92 09:44:20 GMT
Organization: CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

In <WHITLOCK.35@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu> WHITLOCK@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu (Reid E. Whitlock) writes:

>It's not just ***SOME*** grass they walk on it's **MINE***. Thta's what 
>private property is all about. Ownership. Remember "a man's home is his 
>castle"? It's the only place where, within certain limits, I can basically 
>do what I want --- determine my own environment. What I want!!! is an animal-
>free environment. What I also want is some suggestions on how to achieve 
>this. I did not ask for therapy from you nor recommendations that I seek it 
>elsewhere, thank you very much.

Neither traps, poison nor gunfire will keep animals off your property.  You
might get some, but there will always be more to replace them.

Have you considered building a fence?

Poisoning your neighbours' pets sounds like a good way to get into trouble.
-- 
_|\ |V| /|_  Steve Bougerolle, U. of British Columbia Physics Dept.
\  \| |/  /   and the OPAL experiment, CERN, Geneva CH
 >_______<    STEVEB@CERNVAX.UUCP  STEVEB@CERNVM.CERN.CH
     !        STEVEB@CERNVM.BITNET  45397::STEVEB (HEPnet)
Xref: sparky soc.misc:545 alt.flame:6801 alt.politics.homosexuality:2136 alt.activism:7716 soc.motss:20325
From: dfpedro@nv2.uswnvg.com (Donn F. Pedro)
Newsgroups: soc.misc,alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.activism,soc.motss
Subject: Re: Redux: FAGGOTS ON PARADE!
Date: 13 Apr 92 15:38:51 GMT
Reply-To: dfpedro@uswnvg.UUCP.UUCP (Donn F. Pedro)
Followup-To: soc.misc
Organization: US West NewVector, Bellevue, WA

In article <farenebt.702057400@craft.camp.clarkson.edu> farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Big Bri) writes:
>Artimus@TCRS.COM writes:
>
>>THIS IS WONDERFUL!
>
>Artimus is back, big fucking deal. I wonder if he actually reads the follow
>ups to his posts.

I wonder if anyone actually reads the followups to his posts.



     Donn Pedro ...................{uunet, sequent, pn400}!uswnvg!dfpedro.
From: v581qy9v@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Jaime L Arroyo)
Newsgroups: soc.misc
Subject: Re: E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR BANISHED CPU
Keywords: Unbanished by the anti-revisionist thought process
Date: 9 Apr 92 17:30:00 GMT
Followup-To: soc.misc
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <30MAR199209410346@zeus.tamu.edu>, pac9897@zeus.tamu.edu (LAST OF THE FAMOUS INTERNATIONAL PLAYBOYS) writes...
>For all of you who are unable to write to B-CPU to let them know just
>how you feel about their rantings because a)their address was banished
>by the revisionist thought police, b)your news program is too crappy to
>enable you to write, here is their address:
> 
>Either write to:
> 
>b-cpu!ralphw@agora.rain.com   (and I believe that the talk command will work
>      				with this address if you want to try it out)
> 
>OR:
> 
>agora!b-cpu!ralphw@uunet.uu.net
> 
>for this second address you may insert the names toddb, gmartin or pfaust
>depending upon whom you wish to talk (or which alias from what I've been told)
> 
> 
> 
>Good luck - I hope this helps those of you whose programs can't read the address
>on thier articles to make a reply. 
> 
>Write today and let them know what you feel.
> 
> 
>Philip A. Carney   PAC9897@zeus.tamu.edu "What d'you think this is some kind  
>On Exchange from   Lancaster University,     joke? Gimme 10 Big MACS and
>                   England.                  a small diet coke" - MC 900ft Jesus
>********************************************************************************
>The views expressed are mine and not necessarily those of Texas A & M University
>   its staff, faculty or students.
>********************************************************************************
From: pac9897@zeus.tamu.edu (REVENGE OF THE KILLER TOMATOES)
Newsgroups: soc.misc
Subject: Re: KILLING DOGS & CATS THAT TRESPASS ON MY PROPERTY
Date: 9 Apr 92 13:36:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <WHITLOCK.35@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu>,
 WHITLOCK@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu (Reid E. Whitlock) writes...
>It's not just ***SOME*** grass they walk on it's **MINE***. Thta's what 
>private property is all about. Ownership. Remember "a man's home is his 
>castle"? It's the only place where, within certain limits, I can basically 
>do what I want --- determine my own environment. What I want!!! is an animal-
>free environment. What I also want is some suggestions on how to achieve 
>this. I did not ask for therapy from you nor recommendations that I seek it 
>elsewhere, thank you very much.
> 
>Reid


Hey, while your there - why not poison the earthworms that are occupying your
precious land. Shoot all those pesky birds flying over head. Nuke those nasty
insects and kill all that damned foliage which is heartlessly occupying your
pride and joy. 
Then dig a hole and kill yourself - no pesky bacteria is going to live
off MY body while I'm alive damnit!!!!


Philip A. Carney		On Exchange from Lancaster University,
Texas A&M University, TX	England.

**********ALL VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE MY OWN, NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF**************
******TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY OR THEIR ASSOCIATES**********

"The lust for power is rooted not in strength, but in weakness..." - Erich Fromm

Newsgroups: soc.misc
From: puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com (Software Dude)
Subject: KILLING DOGS & CATS...Yeah, Just Do It!
Keywords: Trespassing, Legal Recourse, Dogs, Legal Liability, Cats
Organization: WHAT?
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:12:41 GMT

 WHITLOCK@vaxb.gbus.virginia.edu (Reid E. Whitlock) vomits:
>
>I need a swift, untraceable solution that will eliminate the varmints once 
>and for all. Thanks for your help !
>
	Stephen King tells his children of a rotten, old man that hated
animals. One day, the animals grew SO sick of his killing for no reason,
that they banded together, got some dynamite, and blew up his house.
When asked why, one dog replied....
	"I just hate them varmits! He farted upwind of me one day!"

Seriously, call the animal rescue center.
--
Puter		puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com		Go UofL Cardinals!
Newsgroups: soc.misc