HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pkohli@cc.gatech.edu (Prince Kohli)
Subject: Re: Windies Wicketkeeper(s) in the WI Vs Ind 1971 Series
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 20:53:46 GMT

In article <1992Jul25.205114.19724@samba.oit.unc.edu> Rajeev.Pant@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Rajeev Pant) writes:
>A couple of months ago, I read a posting regarding the Indian and Windies
>Test teams for the 1971 series, played in WI. The writer did a good job in
>compiling the list, but was not sure about the Windies' w'keeper ( he guessed
>that it was probably Derryck Murray (sp?). 
>
>Recently, I was browsing through an old "Sportstar" and found the names of
>the players who kept wickets for the WI. Yes players, the Windies used the 
>services of two keepers.
>
>1.	T. M. Findlay	-	1st/2nd Tests
>2.	D. M. Lewis 	-	3rd/4th/5th Tests

Yup, I think it was (Desmond?) Lewis too. He now plays in the Atlanta
Cricket League. Saw him playing last Sunday itself.

>
>Rajeev Pant

Cheers,

-Prince

pkohli@cc.gatech.edu      | "What's so unpleasant about getting drunk?" 
Distributed Systems Group,| "Ask a glass of water."   Hitchhikers'....
College of Computing, Georgia Tech.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: msg@DSG.Tandem.COM (Maitreya Sengupta)
Subject: Re: info needed
Organization: Tandem Computers Inc., Cupertino CA
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 22:04:12 GMT

In article <Brt69C.Cv9@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v124t66l@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Sudip K Mazumder) writes:
|> In article <1992Jul22.174946.17755@vela.acs.oakland.edu>, mkyeddan@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Murali Yeddanapudi) writes...
|> >Hello netters, 
|> >               Does someone remember the breathtaking one-day match
|> >(IND-PAK) at Sharjah, in which Miandad hit a sixer off the last ball
|> >from Chethan Sharma ? I was wondering if PAK needed only 4 runs off the
|> >last ball or more in order to win. Could someone post the info ? Thanks
|> >in advance.
|> > 
|> >vijay
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> Dear Vijay,
|> Pak needed only 3 runs to win and they got it from our ever benevolent 
|> Chetan Sharma.
|> 
|> 
|> Sudip

Hmmmmm.....as far as I remember, Pak needed 3 to *tie* and 4 to win the match. I
think I remember this because one commentator kept repeating that the ball *has*
to cross the boundary for a Pak win.

Regards;

Maitreya Sengupta.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: g89r4255@hippo.ru.ac.za (Lt Sajid Rahim)
Subject: Re: Pakistani Players Use Filthy Language!?
Organization: Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 13:01:20 GMT

>and etymology :-). Baoo gaalaan de baghair gallaan da ki suaad. 
>(for those unfortunate enough not to understand this sensuous
>language, it means -- a tongue in cheek is better than two
>wagging -- am I right Jawad :-))

Completely wrong translation, if I may add.

Please, guys let's not get carried away about cricket.

I am sure that most players in the world use foul language and
so why should the Pakistanis be left out But it is completely
wrong to corner just the Pakistanis.

Hope I dont offend anybody. No offence intended.

Sincerely

Sajid




-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--   Sajid Rahim, Dept of Computer Science, Rhodes University,     --
--   Grahamstown, South Africa. Internet : g89r4255@hippo.ru.ac.za --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: cdcs@st-andrews.ac.uk (Colin D. C. Steele)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Nat West Trophy - Semi-Final Draw
Date: 30 Jul 92 11:05:00 GMT
Organization: St. Andrews University, Scotland.


National Westminster Bank Trophy - Semi Final Draw


   LEICESTERSHIRE     v    ESSEX               At Leicester


   WARWICKSHIRE       v    NORTHAMPTONSHIRE    At Birmingham



Matches to be played August 12 (13)


CDC
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: chaudhry@schroedinger.engin.umich.edu (Iblees)
Subject: Re: Double Internationals
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 23:07:29 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Originator: chaudhry@schroedinger.engin.umich.edu


In article <22JUL199220035431@zeus.tamu.edu>, avs4700@zeus.tamu.edu (ANAND SRINIVASA) writes:
> Michael Holding was a 400m runner and participated in the 
> World University Games (not the Olympics). I am not sure
> if he won any medal though.
> 
> Also, there was this captain of the English team of the 
> forties - I don't remember his name (Douglas ?). But I 
> sure do remember his initials : JWHT - because he was also
> known as 'Johnny Won't Hit Today' ...
> 
> 
> ____________
> anand. 
> 

His name was Johnny Douglas and he won a boxing gold medal in the Olympics ( I 
think in 1908 ). BTW, if memory serves me right, he drowned to his death while 
trying to save his father.

Although I am not sure of it [ no way to consult the record books here :-( ], 
Pakistan's Farooq Hameed was also ( most probably ) a double international. He 
played one test for Pakistan ( vs Australia ? ) in the 60's and was also an 
international athlete. 

C.B.Fry, England's captain around 1910 was also a double international. He 
played rugby (?) at an international level and was also a noted long jumper.

Can somebody having access to "Barclay's World of Cricket" please confirm the 
other game Fry played? And if somebody has access to "25 Years of Sports in 
Pakistan" he/she can confirm for the net whether Farooq Hameed represented 
Pakistan in international athletics.

Nauman [ Iblees ] Chaudhry

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 "Salim [Malik] bats, as it were, in velvet gloves. No one
  playing the game today,not even David Gower at his best,
  has a greater gift for effortlessness."
     
     John Woodcock in The Times June 9th,92
      
     Eat your hearts out David Gower fans :-) :-) :-)

     GO SALIM MALIK GO!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: aamir@cs.sfu.ca (Aamir Husain)
Subject: Pak vs Eng T4
Keywords: after Tea D4
Organization: CSS, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 15:50:10 GMT

England just lost the 4th wkt

Eng 63/4

Stewart = 2 c Moin khan b Musthaq

Back to headingley, because we now have a match going on

Aamir
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: sidi@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Sadiq Yusuf)
Subject: Testing...testing...
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 08:55:15 GMT


	This is a test.It is only a test.If it was a real message, these
words would be followed by some sharp, incisive comments that would stun
the reader with thier intelligence. Since it is only a test, that will not
happen. On reading this test message, just hit the space bar and go on to
the next message. That is the end of this test ( as you see, it's shorter
than  5 days ). 
	:-) :-) :-) 

			Sadiq [ the Tester ] Yusuf

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: rbodin@bnr.ca (Richard Bodin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: re:Question on Umpiring and LBW
Date: 28 Jul 92 14:47:58 GMT
Organization: BNR Europe Ltd, Maidenhead, UK
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

That reminds me of a incident that I was told about when on the last ball
before Lunch the ball hit the pads of a batsman. All the players went
in and had lunch and when they returned to the field to start the
afternoon session the bowler appealed to the umpire for an LBW, which
the umpire duly give as 'Out!'

So, if that is true the second appeal should have been given. Also, I
always thought the appeal was 'HOWZAT!!!!!!!!!!'

Rich Bodin
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: srini@ecf.toronto.edu (KANDALA SRINIVAS)
Subject: Re: Neutral Umpires ---> Pick your own !
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 16:11:41 GMT

In article <1992Jul30.152858.13722@bnrmtl.bnr.ca> sewell@tsingtao.bnr.ca (Henry Sewell) writes:
>
>Yet in baseball, the umpires always seem to give instant
>and confident decisions. Rarely do the players argue
>(though they don't always look happy!). Similarly, the
>action replays generally vindicate the umpires.

You don't see too many complaints because the umpire union is
a very strong one and it can bring down the whole major league
baseball.

The fans of the canadian based teams complain of bias too(there
are some people who still believe that the ALCS loss of the
jays to royals is because of the biased comparing). Having
said this, i still believe that you have less complaints in 
baseball because the umpires are not affliated to any single 
franchise.

>Henry Sewell       My opinions, not my employer's.
> 
>
srini

-- 
Blue Jays: 1992 World Champions (I say this every year. I hope they
make it this time)
From: ravi@wti.com (Ravi Raj)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Why is cricket not an Olympic sport ?
Date: 22 Jul 92 17:46:39 GMT
Organization: Wavefront Technologies Inc, Santa Barbara, CA

The only reason I can think of is the sheer duration of 
the game. A full 8-10 hours for every match is probably
not financially feasible. But did you know that in the
year 1900, cricket was a full medal Olympic event? And
they probabaly didn't have a limited overs concept then,
so each match must have taken 6 to 8 days to complete. But
there probabaly were not more than 3 or 4 cricket playing 
nations then...

Any input?
-- 
--
Ravi N. Raj					ravi@wti.com
From: shankar@sgi.com (Shankar Unni)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: absurd ranji rule
Date: 28 Jul 92 00:52:07 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

In article <1992Jul27.220723.15570@cs.umn.edu> karnik@cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik) writes:

>In <nr0sodg@fido.asd.sgi.com> shankar@sgi.com (Shankar Unni) writes:
>>No, that would *not* have happened. The scoring-rate rule is applied [...]

>	Waitaminnit, it's not the scoring-rate rule that would have been
>applied here, it's the slow-overrate rule! If Delhi had been allout then,
>Bombay would have been penalized @ 12 runs/over short, and they had bowled 
>several overs short at that point. So, with those additional penalty runs,
>Delhi's 1st-innings total would have exceeded Bombay's score. Later, Bombay
>caught up with the overrate, and dismissed Delhi 1 run short of their score 
>to go on to the finals.

Oh, geez, that's right. Yet another crazy rule that I forgot about..
Yeah, you're right - this *could* have happened..  I assume that
Bombay flung down some maiden overs rapidly in order to catch up with
the over rate...

>	Come to think of it, this must have been the quarters, not the semis,
>since Bombay haven't made it to the Ranji finals for some time now....

This *was* the quarters - a dim memory is sneaking into my brain ..

>>Personally, I think the scoring-rate rule and the first-innings rule
>>both stink. But they are necessitated by the even crazier knock-out
>>4-day tournament. The whole concept of a knock-out multi-day
>>tournament is silly.
>
>	Hasn't this now been rectified ? With three teams from each zone now
>qualifying for the next stage, I assume the qualifiers will play a round-robin
>with maybe two groups, to decide the finalists... or do they still have a 
>knock-out competition ?

No idea how it's going to be done now..
--
Shankar Unni				E-Mail:	shankar@sgi.com
Silicon Graphics Inc.			Phone:	+1-415-390-2072
From: msg@DSG.Tandem.COM (Maitreya Sengupta)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Field Hockey News
Date: 31 Jul 92 20:22:34 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tandem Computers Inc., Cupertino CA

In article <1992Jul28.180929.26150@crd.ge.com>, malde@tunisia.crd.ge.com
(Jayen Malde) writes:
|> In article <1992Jul28.151116.26837@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> kumar@apollo.cs.jhu.edu (Kumar Ramaiyer) writes:
|> >
|> > 
|> >  India got thrashed against germany in hockey in their first match
|> >  in olympics.  They have to meet england,australia,argentina,
|> >  egypt in the other remaining matches. It is a tough group.
|> >
|> >-Kumar
|> 
|> Does anyone know the final score? Please post on the net (or mail it to me).
|> Sorry for mixing hockey news on this cricket newsgroup.....

Well, if you're still interested in knowing, by now India has lost two, won one,
(and not yet played Australia) and is almost certainly out of the medal race in
field hockey :-(. The scores were :

	Germany 3	India 0
	Argentina 0  	India 1
	GBr 3		India 1

As of today, India is tied (with Argentina) for second last in their group,
behind Australia, Germany, and GBr.

BTW, for all ye Pak fans out there, Pak beat the Unified Team [sic] 6-2
yesterday, and are currently tied for top spot in their group with the
Netherlands. The Pak vs Netherlands game which was played today (sorry, I don't
have the scores yet) should probably decide who tops Group B. 

Regards;

Maitreya Sengupta.

PS: append standard apologies for straying from the expressed subject of
discussion of this newsgroup.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@.bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4813,,21272)
Subject: Re: English Umpiring, hello Rajeev
Reply-To: shamim@.bellcore.com
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 92 15:16:34 GMT

In article 102528SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu,  Spaceman Spiff <SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>In article <1992Jul30.183943.27160@walter.bellcore.com>, shamim@.bellcore.com
>(Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4813,,21272) says:
>>
>>So who is better leg spinner than Mushtaq in the world today?  ......
>>
>he's still got a long way to go before he reaches AQ's level. however, i'd like
>to see if mushtaq have a good series vs india (at home or away), something even
>AQ couldn't do (he averaged about 40 as a bowler vs india)
>
>Stay cool,
>The Thinker


ps
Mushtaq may not have a very good series against India  (quite possibly he 
will not). India has superb players of spin and I can not recall any other world 
class spinner being successful against them in the last two decades. 

	--SAN
From: aamir@cs.sfu.ca (Aamir Husain)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Pak vs Eng T-4
Keywords: 75 minutes after tea, day 1
Date: 23 Jul 92 16:34:33 GMT
Organization: CSS, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada

Pakistan are 96/5 
malik -15no
akram -2 ? no

Inzamam = 5 ct  ? b Munton

Any english netters out there. please update.
Thanks, 

Aamir
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: asim@pak.sps.mot.com (Asim Omair)
Subject: Re: Rule Question
Organization: Motorola Inc., Austin Tx.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 14:09:33 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.091515@axion.bt.co.uk> dgrove@axion.bt.co.uk (David Grove) writes:
>I hope someone out there can settle an arguement/discussion held in the bar (where else) after a recent cricket match.
>If the bowler knocks the bails off the stumps with his leg whilst running up to bowl should the umpire rule a dead ball or allow play to continue with all the usual stuff that applies once the bails have already been removed??
>A quote from the rule book would be appreciated, but failing that then any (factual) replies would be just as useful!!
>		Thanks,
>	  	   Dave Grove.

As far as I know, the umpire should signal a no-ball.
						     Asim.
From: vigneswa@ecs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Another Double International....
Date: 28 Jul 92 15:59:42 GMT

ramana@unislc.uucp (Ramana Ramachandran) wrote: >
>
>The other day I heard that kapil is playing for east bengal in soccer
>which made me think how many cricketers have represented their country
>in another sport?

and many others followed.....

The first to capture 5 wickets in the debut in a one-day international was
Uvais-ul-Karnain, a Sri Lankan.  He  was in Sri Lankan (field) hockey team 
too.  If my memory serves right, Tony Dodemide is the only other player to
capture 5 wickets in the international limited over competitions in  debut.  
Tony captured 5 wickets in his test debut too.  Also he  scored 50 runs in 
his first test. 


Vicky:
UMass, July 28
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: kumar@apollo.cs.jhu.edu (Kumar Ramaiyer)
Subject: Field Hockey News
Organization: Johns Hopkins Computer Science Department, Baltimore, MD
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 15:11:16 GMT

 
  India got thrashed against germany in hockey in their first match
  in olympics.  They have to meet england,australia,argentina,
  egypt in the other remaining matches. It is a tough group.

-Kumar
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: rpbala@ms.uky.edu (Ramprasad Balasubramanian)
Subject: Wisden!
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 13:31:26 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

Hi folks,
	I wish to obtain a copy of the latest Wisden.  Does anyone out there
know of an address where I can get one.  Any idea how much it costs?
Thanks in advance.

Ram P

-- 

 " I have plenty of common sense, I just choose to ignore it" 
								calvin

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@.bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4813,,21272)
Subject: Re: Excitement and Controversy
Reply-To: shamim@.bellcore.com
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 92 15:07:17 GMT

In article 5916@bas-a.bcc.ac.uk,  ucap22a@ucl.ac.uk (Mr Alisdair R Davey) writes:
>Hehe...I like some of Boycotts comments. On an exceedingling good shout from
>Akram (can't remember the English Batsman), Tony Lewis said " Hmmm...possibly
>just missing off stump", Geoff Boycott having already intimated that he thought
>it was out replied "Yes...hitting middle ". Bias ? What Bias ?
>Alisdair


I think I've said it before but it certainly bears repeating: Of all the TMS crowd, 
Boycott impressed me the most. I didn't hear him at Headingley but 
he was one of the few voices of reason at Old Trafford when the Aaqib incident 
hit the fan, and his analysis of the game was of the highest calibre. 
--shamim

---
	--SAN

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: raza@surya.ccs.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed)
Subject: Re: Neutral Umpires ---> Pick your own !
Organization: University of Western Ontario, London
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 18:29:07 GMT

In article <1992Jul29.102000.16173@cm.cf.ac.uk> Alastair.T.Clarke@cm.cf.ac.uk (Alastair Clarke) writes:
>In article <1992Jul28.152522.13876@julian.uwo.ca> raza@surya.ccs.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed) writes:
>>In world cup there were some bad/wrong decision by the umpires at different
>>times and different matches, but there was no hue or cry raised by the
>>teams/players......
>
>I wasn't aware of this until a few days ago, but apparantly two players did 
>raise a hue and cry over decisions by neutral umpires in the World Cup.  It
>seems that Aamir Sohail and Moin Khan were both fined for showing dissent.
>(Does anyone know the details?)
>
>So much for third country umpires being the answer to all of crickets problems!
>
>:-)
>
>Alastair

Did'nt you notice that an ardent cricket fan like you get to know of those
*fines* after three-four months? did'nt it shows that the matter was solved
amicably(sp?). Now how many of cricket fans are still unaware of the
Old trafford incidence?.

Off course third country umpires are not the solution of all cricket
problems but it is definately better then the present setting.

S.R.Raza.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: apm@hpopd.pwd.hp.com (Andrew Merritt)
Subject: Re: 2 questions and a comment
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NSG-PWD, UK.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1scd1 PL4
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 16:43:28 GMT

pmc5@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Paul M Corballis) writes:
:  New Zealand did pretty well (especially at home) for years
: with a bowling attack that relied on medium pace swing and seam bowling
: rather than blistering pace (of course, having Sir Richard Hadlee helped).

I thought Sir Richard _was_ their bowling attack.

Andrew
From: azhar@duke.cs.duke.edu (D. Salman [Quintessential] Azhar)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Sunil does not read the headers anyway : -)
Date: 31 Jul 92 12:01:37 GMT
Organization: Duke University Computer Science Dept.; Durham, N.C.

In article <1992Jul31.053157.580@ecst.csuchico.edu> jawad@ecst.csuchico.edu (Jawad Ali) writes:
>In article <1992Jul30.195302.3467@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> aam9n@hagar1.acc.Virginia.EDU (Ali Ahmad Minai) writes:
>
>[interesting point about the philosophy or art, of all things, and a very
>convoluted digression (Murali beware!) from the subject of racism
>-- all munched]

   I would go a little farther than that, and suggest cross-posting to
alt.armchair.philiophy.for.pseudo.intellectuals. :-) Mr. Minai, why
evade the topic at hand, and seek refuge in armchait philisophy. :-)


dsqa

-- 
"To have loved and lost is better than to have won.... For, the burden
of victory has to be shouldered throughout life, and all losses rest
easy in the insatiable abyss called grave." 
--- D. Salman [Quintessential] Azhar CS Dept Duke U  azhar@cs.duke.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ramana@unislc.uucp (Ramana Ramachandran)
Subject: Re: Double Internationals
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 17:00:49 GMT

avs4700@zeus.tamu.edu (ANAND SRINIVASA) writes:
: Michael Holding was a 400m runner and participated in the 
: World University Games (not the Olympics). I am not sure
: if he won any medal though.
: 

[...]

: ____________
: anand. 
: 

I dont know if this myth is just among indians or not.Micheal Holding
was never an athlete (well ... he is... but never particpated in 400 m).
This confusion I believe is due to the fact (?) there was yetanudder
holding who was an athlete from Jamica.Could somebody from WI confirm this???

ramana [ holding IS a great athlete ] ramachandran
ramana@unislc.slc.unisys.com
From: ccrob@uqvax.cc.uq.oz.au
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Three umpires at a cricket match
Date: 23 Jul 92 14:54:53 AEST
Organization: The Prentice Centre, Uni of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

In article <1992Jul22.193204.27648@leland.Stanford.EDU>, urajan@leland.Stanford.EDU (Uday Rajan) writes:

	{ about plans in South Africa }

I heard a few weeks ago that there are plans mooted (I think for Oz for next 
season) to have a three-umpire rotating panel for matches. Didn't catch 
whether it was for Test, or just First Class or what. In any case, the plan 
is that Umpires A & B do the morning session, B & C do after lunch, and C & 
A do the final session. The idea is that umpire fatigue will be reduced.

--
Rob
From: cdcs@st-andrews.ac.uk (Colin D. C. Steele)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Test Match 1992 July 23 (1st Day)
Date: 24 Jul 92 00:29:33 GMT
Organization: St. Andrews University, Scotland.


Test Match 1992 July 23 (Thursday)
Day 1 of 5
4th Test Match England v Pakistan
Headingley Cricket Ground, Leeds

Pakistan won toss

  PAKISTAN

  Aamir Sohail     c Atherton   b Mallander 23
  Ramiz Raja                    b Pringle   17
  Asif Mujtaba                  b Mallander  7
* Javed Miandad    c Smith      b Pringle    6
  Salim Malik              not  out         57
  Inzamam-Ul-Haq   c Hick       b Munton     5
  Wasim Akram              run  out         12
+ Moin Khan        c Hick       b Lewis      2
  Waqar Younis     c Hick       b Mallander  6
  Mushtaq Ahmed            not  out          6
  Aqib Javed

  Extras                                    24

  Total                                    165-8

  Fall       34-1 (Sohail)   54-2 (Mujtaba)
             60-3 (Ramiz)    68-4 (Miandad)
             80-5 (Inzamam) 111-6 (Akram)
            117-7 (Moin)    128-8 (Waqar)

                      O     M      R     W
  Lewis              16     4     36     1
  Mallander          19     7     55     3
  Pringle            17     6     41     2
  Munton              8     3     19     1
  Gooch               6     3     11     0



  ENGLAND

* GA Gooch
+ AJ Stewart
  MA Atherton
  RA Smith
  DI Gower
  GA Hick
  MR Ramprakash
  CC Lewis
  DR Pringle
  TA Munton
  NA Mallander





Match continues Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday


CDC
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket