HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kumar@walnut.kumar (Kumar)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Indian tour
Date: 10 Nov 92 05:45:52 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.cricket
Organization: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA


Hi

	Sometime back I had posted on the net asking for information on

the Man of Match awards for the test and the one day matches between

Zimbabwe and India.  It seems to have got lost.  Could some one please

post them?  Also, the zero that SRT scored, was it his first in test matches?

With the first test with SA just a few days away here is my Indian XI

1.  Shastri
2.  Raman
3.  Manjrekar
4.  Tendulkar
5.  Azar
6.  Jadeja
7.  Kapil
8.  More
9.  Prabhakar
10. Srinath
11. Kumble


12th man.  Amre


(If this test team has been posted then I agree with him/them.)

This team looks balanced to me.  It has 4 front line bowlers.  It also has

2 (Shastri and Jadeja) not too bad bowlers to back them.  The batting looks

solid with the batting line up going all the way to No. 9.  It may be a

little too harsh on Amre. I feel it looks good (at least on paper).  If it

is a bowlers pitch one can always go for either Chetan or Raju instead of

Jadeja.  Well good luck to the team (whichever)

Kumar
From: pieter@ford.ee.up.ac.za
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: lunch time score: India vs. SAfrica
Date: 13 Nov 1992 04:11:20 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

The morning's play was pretty much dominated by India: Cook out first
ball, Hudson playing and missing on more than one occasion before being
bowled off the inside edge, and Kirsten dropped by Azhar (second slip,
difficult chance).

There were two vociferous appeals for caught behind off Srinath. The replays
showed both to be most likely not out, and they also show More to be
definite Oscar material.

Score 76/2; Wessels 49 n.o., Kirsten 7 n.o..
Kapil 2/20, Prabhakar 0/30, Srinath 0/24, Kumble 0/0

Fall of wickets 0,41
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: raza@engrg.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed)
Subject: Re: ZIM vs NZ T2 FINAL
Organization: DA&MRL, Engineering, UWO, London Ont. CA
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 20:00:36 GMT

First loss for Zimbabwe, still a good start to test cricket considering that
they suffered their first loss in third match they played, all the other contries
lost their very first match(except england).  One must also praise Houghton
for his brave and sporting declaration of their first inning. From their past record
and this attitude they will sure develop into a compititive side, if they are not already.


Can any one tell us the response in Zim towards present serieses(sp?) i.e., crowd
turnout etc etc.
-- 

S.R.Raza.
raza@surya.engrg.uwo.ca

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: rajiv@dvorak.amd.com (Rajiv Malhotra)
Subject: Indian 2nd XI
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Austin, Texas
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 20:20:57 GMT


INDIA TO TAKE PART IN SAARC CRICKET
BANGALORE- India will participate in the SAARC Cricket Tournament at
Bangladesh from Dec 3 to 12.
Mr. C.Nagaraj, Secretary, Board of Control of Cricket in India (BCCI) told
PTI that other teams in the fray are Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and hosts
Bangladesh. All the matches in the tournaments will be one-day games.
The team was finalised on Sunday night.
Manindar Singh(Delhi-Captain), Navjot Sidhu(Punjab- Vice-Captain),
S. Sugwekar(Maharashtra), Surendra Bhave (Maharashtra), Vinod Kambli(Bombay),
K.P.Bhaskar(Delhi), Saurav Ganguly(Bengal), Ajay Sharma(Delhi),
Nayan Mongia(Baroda), Rajesh Chauhan(MP), Prashant Vaidya(Vidarbha),
Winston Zaidi(UP), Salil Ankola(Bombay) and Abhey Kuruvilla(Bombay).
Russi Jeejeebhoy (Bengal) and Sharif Ahmed (MP) will accompany the team
as officials.

-- 
  
--- There is no future in time travel.
 
****     Rajiv Malhotra    *** 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: raza@engrg.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed)
Subject: National Bank new Pak Wills Cup Champs
Organization: DA&MRL, Engineering, UWO, London Ont. CA
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 14:34:20 GMT

Heard this news, did any one has further details about this and esp about 
pakistan team for forth coming tour?

BTW NBP was lead by Iqbal Qasim and Habib Bank was lead by J.Miandad.

Thanks.
-- 

S.R.Raza.
raza@surya.engrg.uwo.ca
From: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Zim v NZ T2 D2 close of play
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:42:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.BxGpAz.JB6
Reply-To: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network



NZ v Zim T2 D2  close of play

     At lunch Zim are 9 for 1 having dismissed New Zealand for 335. NZ lost its
last four wickets this morning for 21 runs. In fact they lost their last seven
wickets for 36 runs. In Zimbabwe's innings Grant Flower was lbw to S'oua for 5.
Arnott and Campbell are batting. For NZ Rutherford scored 72 and was caught by
Andy Flower off Tricos.

    The latest score is:  Zim 133 for 2 with Arnott at 67 and Pycroft at 7.
Campbell was caught by S'oua off Patel for 51.

    At stumps, Zim are 173 for 3. Arnott was out for 68. Houghton with 7 and
Pycroft with 38 are athe crease


K. Sankara Rao                          e-mail ksrao@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu

Department of Electrical Engineering
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105  USA

Phone:  (701)237-7217  (o)
        (701)235-9912  (h)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: karnik@deci.cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik)
Subject: Re: NZ v Zim - Lack of Play
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 17:18:28 GMT

In <1992Nov6.035823.3676@walter.bellcore.com> shamim@bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4711,,21273) writes:


>---
>	--SAN



	How's that for a self-righteous, indignant response ? Well said,
Shamim :-)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  Neeran   Karnik  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dept. of Computer Science,      | Email: karnik@cs.umn.edu
University of Minnesota         |        karn0001@student.tc.umn.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: shankar@sgi.com (Shankar Unni)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Trivia for the Weekend
Date: 7 Nov 1992 02:11:11 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: boris.wpd.sgi.com
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu wrote:

> 2. Who was the first person to retire hurt in
> a test match?

Charlie Bannerman, 1877, 1st ever Test at Melbourne (retired hurt at
165 out of a total of 270-odd, didn't he?)
--
Shankar Unni				E-Mail:	shankar@sgi.com
Silicon Graphics Inc.			Phone:	+1-415-390-2072
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: corsair@bach.udel.edu (CORSAIR the Pirate)
Subject: Gosh, sorry!
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 01:20:37 GMT

Hello all! Gosh, I couldn't believe the response I got just for posting that
harmless posting about the Aust PM XI beating "Australia".  I received 2 mails
and 2 guys posted responses on the net.

Look guys, I never meant to be "picky" or "devalue" so to speak, Mr.Rao's
efforts. In fact, in my posting, I do indeed commend his magnificent efforts.
He's done a terrific job, no doubt about it. Sure he makes mistakes, and like
everyone else, I realise he probably posts them in a hurry, so he makes a few
mistakes. Like everyone, I overlook these mistakes or typos. I just found this
particular one amusing, so I thought I'd just mention it. Nothing to get jumpy
about. I'm sorry that bandwidth was wasted in posting those articles, and I'm
sorry that I'm wasting bandwidth with this posting! If it makes anyone happy,
then I apologize to Mr.Rao: Mr.Rao, I apologize! 

I hope this will stop the needless waste of time and bandwidth, and allow
everyone to get on with the glorious game of cricket.


Ciao for now.

Corsair (the "Surprised" Pirate)

-- 

********************************************************************************
**   ___  ____  ____  ____  ____  ____  ____  **                              **
**  /    /   / /___/ /___  /__ /   /   /___/  **  Stay cool.	              **
From: kaushik@dvorak.amd.com (Kaushik Chhotani)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Final Indian XI for the 1st Test
Keywords: Indian XI for the SA-India test match
Date: 13 Nov 92 19:51:49 GMT
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Austin, Texas


Hi Nettors:

I hadn't seen any postings for the final XI for the Indian Team
on r.s.c. and requested Pieter to email me the team.

Here is the final Indian team as sent to me by Pieter. I am sure
some of you must have been equally anxious to know if Raman,
Jadeja or Amre were playing.

>>>>
Return-Path: <pieter@ford.ee.up.ac.za>
To: cricket-update@ford.ee.up.ac.za, kaushik@dvorak.amd.com
Subject: Indian Team for first test
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 19:54:04 +0200

Oops, Looks like I forgot to post the Indian team. Well, after a few requests,
here goes:

Shastri, Amre, Manjrekar, Tendulkar, Azhar, Jajeda, Kapil Dev, More,
Prabhakar, Kumble, Shrinath

Yesterday it was announced that Raman would be playing, but this morning he
was replaced by the 12th man Amre.

<<<<<

What do you guys think about this team? I feel this is the best team we can
put together on the current form of the players and I am sure this team will
do well. I am pretty happy with the selection of this team.


Thank you very much Pieter for emailing the team to me.

Kaushik Chhotani
-- 
 _______ **** #include <std_disclaimer.h> ****         
 \____  |Advanced * KAUSHIK CHHOTANI             email: kaushik@dvorak.amd.com
 /|   | |Micro    * 5204 E.Ben White M/S 520, Austin TX 78741 *(512)462-6245(W)
| |___| |Devices  * 8420 Bangor Bend Austin TX 78758          *(512)339-4202(H)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: karnik@peca.cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik)
Subject: Re: In the defense (was Re: Vinod Kambli
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 02:12:29 GMT

In <1992Nov11.220513.2155@cc.gatech.edu> sougata@cc.gatech.edu (Sougata Mukherjea) writes:

>>	Absolutely! This has happened so often in the past, that when for once
>>Gavaskar managed to bully the selectors into taking more than the quota of
>>Bombay players along to England, there was a big hue and cry!
>>
>>
>Well, As much as I hate to get into this controversy, I'd like to point out 
>the unfair selection has affected all teams - not just Bombay or TN.

	How ? Unfair selection has affected (adversely) those teams/zones
which had more quality players than their 'quotas'. It has been beneficial
to other teams/zones like East/Central, which wouldn't ordinarily get any
players into the team.

>A big hue and cry was raised for the 1982 selection to England since it had 
>players like Suru Nayak and Ghulam Parkar.
>I hope you guys are not justifying their selection????

	I'm not convinced that they didn't deserve their places. Perhaps I'm
not sufficiently well informed, but who were the contenders for their places
in the team ? Ghulam Parkar was among the prolific scorers of the time, and
also a great fielder. Suru Nayak was probably the only young leg spinner in
the country, and was a more-than-useful batsman. V.V.Kumar might have been
around then, but he was surely too old in 1982 to come into the picture. In
any case, both Nayak and Parkar were dropped after unsuccessful tours, not
kept in the team on the basis of some silly quota!

>Let's stop this thread and hope that India don't screw up the first test as usual.

	Come on, let's have a bit more optimism :->

>        Sougata [ just an Indian :-)] Mukherjea


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  Neeran   Karnik  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dept. of Computer Science,      | Email: karnik@cs.umn.edu
University of Minnesota         |        karn0001@student.tc.umn.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: praim@fraser.sfu.ca (Praim Sankar)
Subject: Frequency for WI-AUS
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 20:03:39 GMT

Could someone post the broadcast frequency for This WI-AUS series.
I presume it will be televised in the WI. How could we view it
and whats the satelite frequency, channel whatever?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: pvr@owlnet.rice.edu (PVR Narasimha Rao)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: In the defense (was Re: Vinod Kambli
Date: 11 Nov 1992 18:46:38 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

In article <1992Nov11.014921.3290@news.acns.nwu.edu>, sidi@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Sadiq Yusuf) writes:

|> In article <5NOV199221285893@utarlg.uta.edu> d188sid@utarlg.uta.edu (S RAMACHANDRAN) writes:


|> >against W.I and Winston Davis, Patterson and Walsh. Believe me if a 
|> >Bombay player made 83 on debut all hell would break loose if he were 
|> >dropped the next match. Raman made a couple of good 50's in NZ ..and since

|> 	I disagree . Iam not absolutely sure about the chronology here, but
|> was Raman dropped for the next game after making 83 ?? As far as I
|> remember, we went to WI after that series at home, and Raman did go along -
|> and failed pretty badly. Again, he has a few good scores, but is still


Just a factual correction. Raman _was_  dropped for the next game after making 83. As you
said, we went to WI after that series at home. But, Raman did NOT go along. He was sent
_later_ as a replacement for Srikkanth who was injured facing Biship.


|> >sidd.ramachandran 

|> 	Sadiq [ lead soldier - Bombay Bombing Brigade :-) ] Yusuf

PVR
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: khan@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (LAHORI POOND)
Subject: Re: Cricket Obituaries
Organization: Purdue University
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 22:53:11 GMT

In article <1dfabtINNonn@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>, banarji@unixg.ubc.ca (Ajai Banarji) writes:
> 		Cricket Obituaries
> 
>   Here is a list of Test players who have passed away in the past few years
> (since mid-1989). Most of this information is from the Wisdens of the
> relevant years.
> 
> Jeff Stollmeyer (WI)	Sep 10 89
> E. G. Mcleod (NZ)	Sep 14 89
> H. B. Cave (NZ)		Sep 15 89
> Norman Yardley (Eng)	Oct  4 89
> Andy Roberts (NZ)	Oct 26 89
> Rajindernath (Ind)	Nov 22 89
> "Gubby" Allen (Eng)	Nov 29 89
> J. Hardstaff jr (Eng)	Jan  1 90
> Graeme Hole (Aus)	Feb 14 90
> Leslie Ames (Eng)	Feb 26 90
> Colin Milburn (Eng)	Feb 28 90
> H. G. Owen-Smith (SA)	Feb 28 90
> D. V. Dyer (SA)		Jun 18 90
> M. J. Hilton (Eng)	Jul  8 90
> J. D. Lindsay (SA)	Aug 31 90
> Len Hutton (Eng)	Sep  6 90
> Frank King (WI)		Dec 23 90
> Miran Bux (Pak)		Feb  8 91
> Bill Ponsford (Aus)	Apr  6 91
> E. L. McCormick (Aus)   Jun 28 91
> H. J. Butler (Eng)	Jul 17 91
> F. R. Brown (Eng)	Jul 24 91
> P. E. Jones (WI)	Nov 21 91
> P. G. Z. Harris (NZ)	Nov 30 91
> Mahmood Hussain (Pak)	Dec 24 91
> Bill O'Reilly (Aus)     Oct  6 91
> 

 Another person who should be added is Dr Jahangir. He was the father of Majid
Khan. I do believe that he played test cricket, though i might be wrong. I thinkhe passed away in 89.

            ___
 Lahori(LHL 111) Poond
From: shafqat@neuro.duke.edu (Saad Shafqat)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: SA World Cup shock
Date: 12 Nov 92 00:45:27 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

In article <1992Nov10.015347.24607@cs.su.oz.au> tom@cs.su.oz.au writes:
>
>	Oh dear, paranoia strikes again.....
>	One of the original postings on this subject outlined
>	the majority required (6 out of 9 or something), and
>	the current positions of various countries as to voting
>	b/w the two possible WC locations.


Well .... perhaps I misunderstood.  I got the impression that either England
or Australia must cast a consenting vote for a WC bid to go through.  So
is it that even if England and Australia both opposed a motion it would
carry so long as a majority consented ?


Saad.


--
From: mcbean@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: WI-WA (Hooper as a bowler)
Date: 11 Nov 92 11:28:07 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620

In article <lfvkmhINNfrl@news.bbn.com>, ckhan@bbn.com (Chico Kahn (Room # 20/317 B)) writes:
> 
>>The usual middle order gymnastics -:)  Who is this guy Angel?  The papers in
>>the UK just listed him as a protege of Alderman.
> 
> Just don't blame my guy Hooper, he's there as a bowler, remember? :-)

The papers here were all tripping over themselves how he flighted the ball
beautifully into the breeze.  I know that for quite some time now various
people have been trying to get him to flight the ball instead of the flat
containing delivery now popular with off spinners.

Any bets on your boy Jimmy Adams making the first test?  Rumour has it if
Simmons keeps failing he may open.

McBean
From: ian@concave.cs.wits.ac.za (Ian Sanders)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: south african team
Date: 9 Nov 92 13:36:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: shannon.1992Nov9.133630.7733
Organization: University of the Witwatersrand
X-Xxdate: Mon, 9 Nov 92 13:32:27 GMT
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12

The South African Cricket team for the first test vs india has just been
announced

Jimmy Cook (Tvl)
Andrew Hudson (Natal)
Kepler Wessels (EP) - Captain
Peter Kirsten (Border) vice - captain
Brian McMillan (WP)
Jonty Rhodes (Natal)
Dave Richardson (EP) wicketkeeper
Omar Henry (OFS)
Meryck Pringle (WP)
Alan Donald (OFS)
Brett Schultz (EP)

12th Man Hansie Cronje

Steven Jack (TVL) on standby if Donald is not fit
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: mohan@theta.mel.dms.CSIRO.AU (Mohan Krishnamoorthy)
Subject: Re: NZ v Zim - Lack of Play
Organization: CSIRO, Div. of Mathematics & Statistics, Melbourne, Vic., AUSTRALI
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 23:18:07 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.130231.11972@waikato.ac.nz> hist1261@waikato.ac.nz writes:

[...stuff on Zim vs NZ Test delay _due to rain_ deleted...]

> Thanks for the reply, but I did already know most of this myself via the radio
> and "Herald".  What I was really was after was a posting from the "other side"
> of the debate, but I guess there are no takers from Zimbabwe.  You can't
> defend the indefensible I suppose...

What _debate_?  Why make every issue a contentious one?  Why treat the
entire world with suspicion?  

Why was there no debate?

. perhaps because the issue was trivially insignificant in the total
  scheme of things!
. more importantly, perhaps because there is no one from Zimbabwe who
  _has_ access to this net!

That doesn't mean they are necessarily indefensible!  Good of the New
Zealand papers to carry that unnecessary interview of Martin Crowe.
Did they carry the views of Houghton?  It is easy to beat your chest,
jump up and down and cry fowl (like the British tabloids did, when
Waqar and Wasim were ripping through their national team like a tailor
would, his cloth).  It is more important to report objectively.

That apart.  Why did Zimbabwe refuse the option of playing in wet and
potentially dangerous conditions? (remember, they do not have the wealth
of experience that NZ has in this level of cricket).  Why not?  I can't
see NZ adopting a simlarly magnanimous attitude in a test match against
Australia (for example) when their own position is precarious.  It is
easy to jump up and down and cry out that these things ought to be done
for the (sic!) `sake of the game' (a banal cricket cliche, if ever there
was one!).  However, when it comes down to the crunch, all teams are
selfish in protecting their self-interest.  NZ is no saint in this
regard.  So, why pretend being one -- for the sake of the game...

/Mohan

> Richard.

-------
Mohan Krishnamoorthy, CSIRO, Division of Maths and Stats,
Private Bag 10, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.
Phone: +61 3 542 2474; 	email: mohan@mel.dms.CSIRO.AU
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Zim v NZ T2 D5 post lunch
Date: 12 Nov 1992 06:58:03 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

     12 Nov 1992

NZ v Zim  D5

      NZ declared their second innings 262 for 5 before lunch setting Zimbabwe
a total of 315 for a win in 68 or 69 overs. Rutherford was out this morning for
89. Deepak Patel was not out with 58.

     Zimbabwe are 28 for 3 a few minutes after lunch.

     The latest score (at 12:45 GMT) is : Zimbabwe 71 for 7. Campbell is the
highest scorer so far with 35. Patel took four of the five wickets that fell
since lunch. He is 4 for 22 in 9 overs.

    For the test at Kingsmead, Donald has been found fit and will play in the
first test match of the 'Friendship Tour'.



Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: karnik@deci.cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik)
Subject: Re: Ramakant Achrekar
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 23:02:39 GMT

In <1992Nov11.171816.23120@ousrvr.oulu.fi> jma@phoenix.oulu.fi (Jacob Matthan) writes:


>The latest issue of THE WEEK has a fascinating article "KINGMAKER OF CRICKRET" about Ramakant Achrekar, the coach who was responsible for amongst others, the development of Sachin Tendulkar. "Sachin always tende sd to overdo things. If he scored 200 during the day, he would still turn out at the post-match nets. Even when he bowled, he would bowl 50 overs in a day."
>Sachin and friends organised a benefit match for Ramakant and collected Rs.400000.

	I read in a recent Times of India that Achrekar in fact donated that
400000 to needy cricketers...

	Among his proteges are Tendulkar, Kambli, Chandu Pandit, Ramnath
Parker, Pravin Amre, etc. - some of the best batsmen Bombay has had in the
recent past. I may be mistaken on this, but I think Ankola is also one of 
his 'products'.

>Fascinating statement about Vinod Kambli. "Vinod Kambli bothers too much about the material things in life. Wearing cut-off jeans and swaggering around with a Walkman does not make a great player (or rather a great player)."
>THWE WEEK ran an intereting gallup before the recent SA tour. If anoyone is interested I can summarise for the net.

	Yes, please do!

>Regards
>Matthan
>Oulu, Finlan


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  Neeran   Karnik  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dept. of Computer Science,      | Email: karnik@cs.umn.edu
University of Minnesota         |        karn0001@student.tc.umn.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: mabg1084@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Mark Alan Brodie)
Subject: SA castle cup
Summary: Scores of CC week 3
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:11:30 GMT
Keywords: South Africa Castle Cup Transvaal


Details of the last round of CC matches:

Tvl vs WP, Johannesburg: draw
WP 1st inns: 410/8 decl (A. Lamb 134, G. Kirsten 109, E. Simons 50;
 S. Jacobs 3/48)
Tvl 1st inns: 333 (J. Cook 123, D. Cullinan 72, R. Snell 44 (40 balls)
 M. Yachad 42; C. Matthews 6/50)
WP 2nd inns: 46/3 (R. Snell 3/25 - hat-trick: Voss (lbw), Bleekers
 (caught at short leg), Lamb (lbw) )
No play on 4th day due to rain.

Natal v/s Border at Pietermaritburg: Natal won by 7 wickets
Border 1st innings : 199 O.Gibson 79 (61 balls)
                         M Marshall 4/36 P Rawson 3/57
Natal 1st :          210 Rhodes 67, Rice 33
                         McCurdy 5/54
Border 2nd:          281 P Kirsten 66 P Strydom 48 O Gibson 44
                         P Botha 42; M Marshall 4/61 T Packer 3/70
Natal 2nd:         272/3 Rhodes 135* Rice 59* M Logan 48

(So now we know why Rhodes made the test team!)

OFS vs EP Bloemfontein Draw
EP 1st: 337 Baptiste 86 Rushmere 85 Bryson 33
OFS 1st 230 Henry 79 Liebenberg 44
            Baptiste 5/51 Bryson 3/50
EP 2nd  199/6 decl Baptiste 68* Wessels 54
                   B Player 3/35
OFS 2nd 54/7       Liebenberg 24* 
                   Baptiste 3/19 Bryson 2/13 Shaw 1/1 off 8 overs
Rain stopped play.

Note 3 batsmen hit wicket: Seeff(Tvl 1st inns) Henry & Arthur (OFS 1st inns)