HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca (John Henders)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Organization:  One of these days.
Subject: Re: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig Was: Way too long
	<1992Apr11.114356.802@crd.ge.com> <H.WnqIfYu2_lk@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca>
	<H.LG0Rz6&DanA@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca>
Reply-To: jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca
X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.00 Rev. Jan 16 1992
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 09:36:04 -0600

In <1992Apr15.045321.7831@rotag.mi.org>, Kevin Darcy writes or may not
have, it's up to the reader to decide:
>
>As far as faithful quoting, try reading a book on English writing style, or
>legal citations sometime. Elisions should ALWAYS be indicated in some form
>or another. To do less is to do potential violence to the author's original
>meaning or intent.

    Please point out the relevant guideline defining this to be 
required  when posting on Usenet.  Do you plan to call for strict
adherance to textbook English writing style and American legalese on
an International forum where more and more participants use English 
as a second language and are not bound by American law? Quelle buffoon.
    The whole idea that alt.flame requires formalistic proof like some
court of law appears to have few adherants outside of yourself.

>Once again, with feeling... it doesn't make a *DAMN* bit of difference 
>whether the attribution line was automatically generated or not, John Boy. 
>Keegan presumably has the power to a) manually edit his attribution, to 
>b) modify the program or script which generated the attribution line, to 
>c) use another newsreading package, to d) use another posting host with better
>software, or, e) if desperate, to not post at all, or f) some combination of 
>the above. THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT APPEARS IN KEEGAN'S ARTICLES 
>IS KEEGAN HIMSELF. Period. End of sentence.

    I'm sure even someone as obviously thick as you has noticed that 
it is not exactly common practice to note every deletion on every edited 
posting to Usenet. Accusing someone of deliberately implying a verbatum
quote, while following commonly used practices is ludicrous. I notice 
the posting I am replying to here carries no such disclaimer, yet you
included the line 
" In article <H.LG0Rz6&DanA@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca
 writes:"  as well. Does this mean you claim to be quoting my entire 
article?  You don't seem to have edited it, or implied in any way that
you have omitted parts.
    As usual, your arguments are based on standards you set for others, 
but do not even follow yourself.


-- 
There are a lot of intelligent people on the net that will go
ballistic when they are subjected to something stupid.
-- Larry Smith on the rec.arts.manga debate
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6803 talk.abortion:15223
From: jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca (John Henders)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Organization:  One of these days.
Subject: Re: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig Was: Way too long
	<1992Apr11.064737.6331@rotag.mi.org>
	<1992Apr11.114356.802@crd.ge.com> <H.WnqIfYu2_lk@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca>
Reply-To: jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca
X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.00 Rev. Jan 16 1992
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 08:33:26 -0600

In <1992Apr14.014021.4140@rotag.mi.org>, Kevin Darcy writes:
>In article <H.WnqIfYu2_lk@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
>>In <1992Apr11.170030.8666@rotag.mi.org>
>>>
>>>Your attribution line says "kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:", does
>>>it not? I did not write the article as you presented it, nor is there any
>>>clue, hint or indication that the article had been altered or doctored in
>>>any way. 
>>
>>    Kevin, you should stay out of discussions in news.admin until you
>>at least have enough of a clue to know that rn and several other common 
>>newsreaders in use automatically append the attribution line to the 
>>follow up articles they generate. 
>
>Just because it's (semi-)automated doesn't mean Keegan is absolved of blame.
>The ultimate responsibility for what appears in Keegan's articles is Keegan 
>himself. Concur?

    No, I don't concur. Can you point me to the relevant article on 
posting where it says that anyone who allows their newsreader to 
generate this line and doesn't edit it is required to either include 
the entire article verbatim, or note that the posting has been edited?
    The closest I can come to any mention of guidelines on following up
a posting is the new users guide where it suggests that followups be 
trimmed. That article contain any suggestion that the automatically
generated attribution line be edited to indicate that this has been done.
>
>Also, don't make assumptions about what people know or do not know. I could 
>probably teach _you_ a thing or two about rn and its progeny...

    So you knew that the attribution line was automatically generated, yet
you accused Keegan of implying that his article was verbatum because he 
had an automaticaly generated line in it. Interesting, and not a strong 
point in your favour at all. 


-- 
       John Henders      jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca
    I think your "evolutionary scale" needs an adjustment.  Either 
      that, or you've got your thumb on it. -> (lefty@apple.com)
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Brain Swapping at PSU
Date: 13 Apr 92 21:06:07 GMT
Article-I.D.: uni.1992Apr13.160607.21627
Organization: University of Northern Indiana


Those of you who've had the slightest exposure to philosophical
thoughts regarding the human mind will no doubt have encountered
articles about split-brain patients and hypothetical brain
transplants.  It has been found that research in a combined area
is taking place at PSU.  Patients who have had their right and left
hemispheres separated as a treatment for seizures are swapping these
hemispheres to study the results.

The following people are apparently involved:
	K e n Robinson
	Bruce Bufalini
	Rick Kelly
	Mark Kinney

The records describing the specifics of which hemispheres were
exchanged have been lost, so the patients were separated and
are now allowed to interact on a.f.  It is believed the K e n
got two hemispheres afflicted with seizures.

One Elmer Fudd was also involved in a preliminary experiment
with a baboon.  The baboon is currently on the faculty at PSU.
Elmer broke out of his cage and is still at large.

Melvin M. Gladstone
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinsn@carn-dum.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: K e n bashing (was Re: Kevin's "Business" Practices)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 17:16:18 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.182038.10507@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mneeley@isis.cs.du.edu (Mark Neeley) writes:
>In article <jc8Hzp?q6@cs.psu.edu>, krobinsn@mirkwood.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>> In article <22980@goofy.Apple.COM> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>> >In article <0u6Hp*&e6@cs.psu.edu>, krobinsn@carn-dum.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J
>> >Robinson) writes:
>> >>
>> >> Can we say MISINFORMED, boys and girls?
>> >
>> >The evidence would strongly suggest that that's all you _can_ say.
>>
>> Can we say IDIOT-AT-LARGE, boys and girls?
>
>Uh oh.  K e n is on the loose again.  Yes, K e n, the champion of evolution,
>toilets, Strobl, misinformed, Bruce Bufalini, and PSU is still posting like
>a mad-man.  Sigh.  One can only hope that after he graduates, his future
>employer won't allow him access to the net.  Then again, there are public
>access places.  Hmmm.  Wonder if we could get someone to cut off his fingers.
>Just a thought.

Mark, you have turned so violent these days. It appears as if Mel isn't
treating you like the friend he claimed to be. If I were you, I would
re-evaluate myself. Perhaps taking a long sip from the urinal you
see before yourself will awake you from your illusions.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts TO Justify "Queer Nation"(FIXED .SIG)
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:49:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr8.104919.694

In article <1992Apr8.020040.21615@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>  writes:
 
}Disclaimer: Opinions are based on logic rather than biblical "fact".  ------
}This is a mutated signature virus, if you don't put it in your .sig   \    /
}file you may lose your job, your dog may be run over, and you may die. \  /
}If you repent and add the .sig you may win the lottery and get laid.    \/ 
 
> >Too bad the disclaimer isn't based on fact.  Maybe we can fix that.
> >Here's how it should read:

> >Disclaimer:  Opinions are based on homosexuality and queerness.  ------
> >This is bear code, and if you are gay and don't put it in your   \    /
> >sig, your state of homosexuality may not be acknowledged on this  \  /
> >newsgroup.  You won't have lots of e-mail sex and the support of   \/
> >all the wonderful fags on alt.flame.  You might not meet cool queers
> >at gay bars or be successful at picking up boys.  If you convert and
> >add this to your .sig you may get laid and catch AIDS.

> Karsten, honey, if you're going to talk about BearCode, the least you could
> do is to actually put a sample of it into "your .sig"... :]

I'm flattered that the homosexual community thinks so much of me that
they want me to join them.  What's the matter, fellas, your ranks been
getting kind of thin, lately?  
 
> And, unfortunatly, your "facts" are wrong.  I've never had e-mail sex with
> anybody.  I don't pick up boys, I pick up men.  

I never said YOU did.

> I don't do conversions,

It's nice to see that we have one thing in common, though, I don't do  
conversions either, so I will stay straight, if you don't mind.

> Finally,
> although I do get laid (not enough, but... :]),

Glad to hear it, is that a crowning achievement?

> I'm in a lower risk 
> group of becoming HIV+ then you are.

So, wait, first you say that you have sex (with implications
that it is homosexual sex) and then you say that you are in a 
lower risk group than I am?  What garbage!  

Look at transmission rates of the HIV among homos vs. heteros 
and the percentages of homos vs. heteros who have AIDs (in this 
country, I could care less how many straight people in Timbuktu 
have AIDS) and you will see that you are wrong.  

I have heterosexual sex, on occasion, with adequate protection.
I have had no blood transfusions, and I do not use IV drugs.
The only way to be lower risk than I am would be to NOT have
sex at all.
 
> Now, watch the .sig closely, Karsten, and see if you can spot the BearCode

Uh-uh, no thanks.  I appreciate your concern, but I don't need to be
fluent or even slightly familiar with bearcode, your code, or no code.

Karsten Hendrick
karsten@nic.gac.edu
karsten@lavatch.gac.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
From: adamk@media.mit.edu (Adam Kao)
Subject: Re: Regrets
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: MIT Media Laboratory
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 16:11:38 GMT

In article <D3FeJB2w164w@homophobes.CtEdge.COM> djk@homophobes.CtEdge.COM writes:
>twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
>
>> You're evading the question, as usual.
>
>Refusing to grace garbage with an intelligent answer is not evading..

Your life must be filled with garbage.

Adam
From: 6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts TO Justify "Queer Nation"(FIXED .SIG)
Date: 13 Apr 92 01:35:11 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.114922.795@gacvx2.gac.edu> karsten@nic.gac.edu (Myfavorite Saltlick) writes:

>Whatever your misconceptions on the issue happen to be, women have
>no problem sitting next to me, Chrisstick, I doubt if one ever get's 
>caught, dead or alive, by you.

My god, I've attained the status of an Insitiute!  Thanks, Smallpiece.
Since I don't find it necessary to 'catch' women, I suppose the rest
of your drivel, is as usual, meaningless.


>Don't let all the sexual overachievers in life pass you by,
>Chrissy, accomplish what you flame others for not having done.
>You'll feel better about yourself.

More of Kattles projection, poor fellow.  Oh, by the way, I'll let
you know when I see a 'sexual overachiever.'  Hey Soapdish, are you
admitting to multiple partners?

>I know that, but the fuckwit who was telling me that I am in a
>higher risk group than he is obviously didn't.
>I know only too well the dangers of the HIV+.  I doubt that you
>can lecture me effectively on the subject.

Anyone can recognize the dangers.  I don't know who told you you were
in a lower risk group (although I suspect you are at less risk than
anyone else here), but your chances of catching the disease are goiing
to be dependent more on behavior than orientation, as I've said.

>> Why don't you mail your SAT's to me.  Then I'll mail mine to you.
>> Then we can post them similtaneously.  

>Yeah, right, I wouldn't trust you with a pail of piss, much
>less my SAT scores.

Now the man who chides me for mentioning sheep brings a pail of
piss into the argument.  Can you say watersports, Karstie?  Is
*that* what you're really into.  Icky.  But I'll take good
care of your SAT's.  What could I possible use them for, other
than to provoke a good laugh at parties?

>Very uninsightful, Chrisstick, your cluelessness has obviously 
>become more of a problem of late.  I don't need to find my dick,
 
Once again, I am compared to an institute.  How odd.  I certainly
agree that the Breadstick of emperors doesn't need to find his
dick.

>It doesnt take a lot of effort.I

And this must certainly be true.

>Karsten Hendrick, The Eternal Saltlick.

cws
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6387 alt.politics.homosexuality:1870
From: QAA@psuvm.psu.edu (Tim Bieling)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 9 Apr 92 01:19:22 GMT
Article-I.D.: psuvm.92099.211922QAA
Organization: Penn State University

In article <L60ViB2w164w@Bogus.COM>, punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) says:
>[...stuff deleted...]
>Well, if you would bother to take the time to read the fucking message, you
>would see that the message that I followed, the idiot was talking about
>FUCKING (totally naked) on the front page of the news paper.

And when the correct reference was posted (kissing vs fucking), you
continued to refer to "fucking".  I read the entire thread, and that's
what you did.  I don't know of ANY magazine or newspaper that would have
a picture of two people fucking on the cover (only the glossy porn stuff
in adult bookstores carry that stuff).

Think for a change. Sheesh, another twit - I'm surprised you figured
out how to make kids (assuming you really have some).

-Tim
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7087 rec.music.misc:14530 alt.stupidity:1632 alt.exploding.kibo:206 alt.religion.kibology:1707
From: dap@predator.vpharm.com (David A. Pearlman)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,rec.music.misc,alt.stupidity,alt.exploding.kibo,alt.religion.kibology
Subject: Re: Some Other Establishment Screwup!
Date: 17 Apr 92 14:06:19 GMT
Organization: Awesome opticals, Inc.

In article <1992Apr17.032351.7939@zip.eecs.umich.edu> provoc@elvis.is.my.guide (The Provocateur) writes:
>In article <1992Apr17.000108.28883@mcs.gvsu.edu> bryant@perlis.mcs.gvsu.edu (John Q. Public) writes:
>>> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>>>> mckinzie@schaefer.math.wisc.edu (Mark McKinzie) writes:
>>>>>royander@sal-sun109.usc.edu (Roy Anderson) writes:
>>>>>>, bur@ultisol.gsfc.nasa.gov (Mike Bur) writes:
>>>>>|> cease@carina.unm.edu (Cecilia De Blasi) writes:
>>>>>|> >davros@vesta.unm.edu (DAVROS) writes:
>>>>>|> >>jxj5824@hertz.njit.edu (JJ) writes:
>>>>>|> >>>klein@kira.egr.msu.edu (Jeffrey Klein) writes:
>>>>>|> >>>>bur@ultisol.gsfc.nasa.gov (Mike Bur) writes:
>>>>>|> >>>>>dkelly@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (Rocky Horror) writes:
>>>>>|> >>>>>>squankmastr@squank.o.rama.gov (Squanky) writes: 
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>aerosmith@elevator.com (Sweeeet Emooootion) writes: 
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>>noman@is.an.island.se (Thomas Merton) writes: 
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>>>rohmer@forehead.verbena.com (Dream Detective) writes:
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>>>>rabbit@buster2.Michigan.COM (Dr. Roger Rabbit) writes: 
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>>>>>kibonator@skynet.worls.std.com (THE KIB0NATOR) writes: 
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>>>>>>Elvis is outside. 
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>>>>>Elvis is my guide.
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>>>>Elvis has five brides.
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>>>Elvis can't hide.
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>>Elvis can slide.
>>>>>|> >>>>>>>Elvis can glide.
>>>>>|> >>>>>>Elvis is old, dead, and dried.
>>>>>|> >>>>>Elvis likes to fold red hide.
>>>>>|> >>>>Elvis liked the old red light district.
>>>>>|> >>>Elvis bites his mom and dies.
>>>>>|> >>Elvis saw me so I am alive.
>>>>>|> >Elvis taught me how to jive.
>>>>>|> Elvis bought a can of Spam.
>>>>>Elvis said 'Therefore I am!'
>>>>Elvis died whilst in the can!
>>>Elvis probably was overfed by his nan.
>>Elvis toasted overread battle plans. 
>Elvis ghost-wrote "Battlefield Earth".
Elves make Keebler cookies.

Mr. Bad eyesight.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Big Bri)
Subject: Re: HOMOSEXUALITY IS ECONOMICALLY ADVANTAGEOUS
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 03:34:58 GMT

punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:

>farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Big Bri) writes:

>> (great buzzword to get people's attention) would be needed. When someone
>> engages in homosexual relations, there is no chance that either party
>> will get pregnant and take up your taxdollars, in that respect.
>> 
>> If heterosexuality is inherently "bad" and homosexuality is inherently "good"
>> how do the phobes justify the existence of bisexuality.

>Say bye-bye to the human race....

Great answer, that really clears it up for me.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BRI FARENELL 	  is a bleeding heart liberal card-carrying member of the ACLU.
CLARKSON '95
FARENEBT@CRAFT.CAMP.CLARKSON.EDU

"Yassir Arafat had a terrible accident. He tried to fax a mail bomb...."
	---Johnny Carson
From: ckincy@mcs213h.cs.umr.edu (Charles Kincy)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts TO Justify "Queer Nation"(FIXED .SIG)
Date: 16 Apr 92 19:49:35 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla

In article <83824@bu.edu> kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star) writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.133529.741@gacvx2.gac.edu>
>homohater karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) gives a deep
>analogy of HIV transmission rates among homo- and heterosexual
>populations:
>
>>Think of it this way.  We both have cars.  Mine is going 100, yours
>>is going 50.  Mine is accelerating at 1 mile per hour per second,
>>and yours is accelerating at 2 miles per hour per second.  My car
>>is still going faster, even though yours is accelerating faster.
>
>Yep, and what do you think happens if you wait long enough? The
>car with the greater acceleration overtakes the other, no matter
>how fast the faster car is going.

It's not quite that simple.  Given the finite number of homosexuals
and heterosexuals (and both, and neither) "at risk," the car going 
100 miles an hour will probably run out of gas before the car 
going 50 miles an hour catches up.

("At risk."  Hmmm....  I keep hearing this term, and I am not sure
what it really means.  Does that mean sticking some appendage in
someone's orifice without encasing it in latex first?)

What happens then is that the car going 50 "rear ends" the now
inanimate object on the highway.  This causes a big, bloody mess,
which ties up the state highway patrol long enough for everyone to
drive 100 miles an hour wherever they want for a few weeks.  And then
they go vocal about it, and demand the right to drive 100 mph anywhere
they wish.

The result of this is that irate citizens go to the attorney general
and demand action against those who drive their cars around at 100
miles per hour.  He pressures the legislature, and new severe laws
against driving cars at 100 mph are passed.  Also, the laws guaranteeing
the rights of those who drive their cars at 100 mph are rescinded.

Oh, shit, guess this already happened didn't it?

CPK
From: keegan@windsurf.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Where Karsten Likes To Do It
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:42:06 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

In article <1992Apr14.093911.871@gacvx2.gac.edu>
	homophobe, karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) writes:
-> In article <1992Apr14.011025.8563@crd.ge.com>  writes:
-> Keegan, I don't think we care about the message id.
-> That's "we" as in alt.flame, and if you want to 
-> prove me wrong, take a poll of who likes to see
-> message id's in every follow-up post and post the results. 

you're the silly twit who wrote "we." it's not my job to make up
your list. do it yourself, sonny. until then, your "we" will have
as much credibility as your other lies.

-> > -> > 1.  In a weight room on a bench (after a workout)
-> > -> > 3.  In a sauna, while sipping Long Island Ice Teas
-> > -> > 4.  On a running washing machine (spin cycle, hot/warm wash)
-> > -> > 6.  On a Super-size bed, surrounded with lots of stuffed animals
-> > -> > 8.  A locker room
->   
-> > -> > 2.  On a tennis court (on a hot day)
-> > -> > 5.  On a cold, hard floor (like marble)
-> > -> > 7.  In a gun closet/armory
->  
-> > -> By the way, 2, 5, and 7 on that list haven't been accomplished yet.
->  
-> > do tell readers about 1, 3, 4, 6 and 8.
-> 
-> I think all of them are pretty self-explanatory, I didn't know
-> when I subscribed to this newsgroup that I would have to fill
-> in as an instructor

well sonny, you'll not actually be the instructor. you're the
entertainment.

-> > -> Tune in to alt.sex for important updates on the matter.
-> > you're not protesting too much. you're not. really.
-> No, I usually don't protest about having sex.  

and just how often does your having sex occur sonny?

--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
From: trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Kebbin the Statistician
Date: 9 Apr 92 12:26:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: crud.29e34090.crud
Organization: Stuck with a PC-clone (St. Paul, Minnesota, USA)

In article <1992Apr4.175206.18513@rotag.mi.org>
        flamestats@rotag.mi.org (Kebbin the Statistician) writes:

]Actually Mr. Royce posted 114 articles and only 39 of them were 
]responded-to.  That's a hit-ratio of 34.5%.  Which is still a
]better hit-ratio then other ubiquitous posters like Barry Schwartz, 
]John F. Woods & Chris Colby.

Once again you make that error:  equating readership with writership.
Ha!  Your sight is too narrow to be that of a true philosopher.  A
philosopher, or any seeker of truth, must have wide vision and narrow
scrutiny.  You have narrow vision and minute scrutiny.  You cannot see
the forest for the crinkle in the bark of one tree, 3 mm above the
ground and 1.2 radians east of north, which seems to be a mixture of
forest green and burnt umber, and which no one else can find.

It matters not at all whether or not we get responses.  There are
50000 readers and a handful of posters, and what matters is whether
some good portion of the readers are entertained.  It happens that the
main reason I haven't gotten many responses lately is that most of my
articles have been addressed to you, and you don't read my postings.
However, usually I do not wait upon your response, or for you to read
what I write.  I address you for rhetorical effect.  It is people who
laugh at you who are the intended readers, and I believe they make up
a good portion of all the readers of alt.flame.

Of course, I have to congratulate you for keeping your hands over
your eyes longer than anyone else has.


--
Barry Schwartz        trashman@crud.mn.org
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6514 alt.politics.homosexuality:1983