HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: firestar@leland.Stanford.EDU (Lipton Ann Meredith)
Subject: Re: McCoy Quotes Wanted
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 02:09:50 GMT


>"Devil in the Dark"  McCoy says:  "Dammit, Jim!  I'm a doctor, not a
>bricklayer!"  when asked to fix up the injured Horta.  Also, in the episode
>with Julie Newmar as a pregnant chief's wife (Private Little War?  Not sure...)
>he says something like "I'm a doctor, not an elevator/escalator."  
>So, there are two examples.  Can anyone fill in the name of the second episode
>I quoted?  
>

That was Friday's Child -- I just realized it WAS Julie Newmar!  I didn't
know that, but looking back, I see it's true.  How amazing!

Firestar


-- 
I don't bite, you know.    | Find me and turn thy | It is better to have loved 
Unless it's called for.    | back on heaven.      | and lost than to have your
-- Audrey Hepburn, Charade | -- R. W. Emerson     | finger caught in a blender.
*******************************************************************************
From: stdnt163@whscdp.whs.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: STV is NOT ST5:TFF, but ST Voyages!!!
Date: 9 Oct 92 08:26:13 CST
Organization: Washington HS, Milwaukee, WI

	Marcus TaiLore and I were afrasid this would happen...

	It seems people are mistaking "STV" in his article "Marcus TaiLore
speaks: STV" to mean Star Trek 5: The Hellish Bad Film.
	We'd like to reassure everyone that STV is the acronym for our
short story series, Star Trek Voyages.

	With this in mind, please read the aforementioned article, as it
contains great info about the upcoming Second Year of Star Trek Voyages.

							Thanks everyone,
							James Queen.
From: rjking@acsu.buffalo.edu (Randall J. King)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Beverly Crushers year long absence on ST:TNG
Date: 8 Oct 92 19:18:28 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: UB

henryk@miki.pictel.com (Keith Henry) writes:

>What was the official explanantion (both on show and off) for the absence of
>Beverly Crusher for the year that the actress Diana Muldare (sp?) was chief
>medical officer?

By the show:  She was promoted to StarFleet Medical and was transferred.

By real life: I believe she wanted to do other projects (ie Hunt for Red 
October ?). I believe she worked on this during her 'sebatical'.

signing off from the satelite of love.....           ___   _____  ___
	                                    |\  /|  |   \    |   /   \   |  / 
rjking@acsu.buffalo.edu                     | \/ |   \       |       /   | /
v050qrq3@cc.buffalo.edu	                    |    |    \      |    --<    |<
                                            |    |     \     |       \   | \
push the button Frank...                    |    |  \___|    |   \___/   |  \ 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Subject: stvi press kit for sa
Reply-To: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 16 Oct 92 19:19:33 EST

 -=> On 10-15-92  09:51, Rick Lippens babbled to All saying: <=-

 >I'm interested.  I'll take it off your hands for oh, five bucks?

 RL> I'll even top that!  I'll pay five AMERICAN bucks...unless that
 RL> excludes some warped form of GST (no star trek pun intended).

(ooooh, low blow)  You weren't supposed to read that, it was supposed to
be for e-mail but I forgot to change some things and it was made public.
Oh well...  (You don't think $5 is an unreasonable price, do you?)

Anyways, I think I read the other day that $1 american will get you
something like $0.85 Canadian...  Of course I could be wrong.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jason Wong
Calling from Markham, Ontario CANADA.  It's not cold though!  :-)
E-MAIL: bernie.wong@canrem.com


... Mental Floss prevents Moral Decay.
--- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: cea1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Carolyn E. Adams-Price)
Subject: Re: "Probe" and "Imzadi"
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 04:27:44 GMT

Carolyn Adams-Price
Department of Psychology
Mississippi State University
cea1@ra.msstate.edu
From: atb@gserv1.dl.ac.uk (A.M.T. Bell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: What are little girls made of
Date: 8 Oct 92 14:05:51 GMT
Reply-To: atb@gserv1.dl.ac.uk
Organization: Daresbury Laboratory, UK


The latest TOS episode on BBC2 was "What are little girls made of",
this is the one when the brilliant scientist (and Christine Chapel's
fiance) makes an android copy of Kirk and Lurch from the Addams family
bumps off 2 disposible reshirts. A so-so episode, good if you're
a Majel Barrett fan though. Kirk is *cunning* in saying something insulting
about Spock so that the duplicate gives himself away. Only half of
the season 1 regulars were in this one, it would have been better
with Scotty, McCoy etc in it. Having another duplicated Kirk episode
so soon after "The Enemy Within" didn't help.
The android copy of Kirk was supposedly identical to the real one
but andoids don't eat. It would be fairly easy to differentiate between
the two, just make both of them eat or go to the bathroom :-)
(oh sorry the big E doesn't have any :-)). Spock could do a mind meld,
i'd like to see a how an android could get round that one.

I can see from this episode how they got the idea for Data (*good* application)
and the Borg (*bad* application). 
At the end of the episode Christine decides she's going to stay with the
ship, like where else could she go?

tony bell                 ! keep on running   live long and prosper
serc daresbury laboratory ! "back off man, i'm a scientist"
atb@uk.ac.dl.gserv1       ! bill murray - ghostbusters
From: cfs@cowpas.waffle.atl.ga.us (Charles Stephens)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Modern THEORIES and Reality (was RE: S.O.S. signal!)
Date: 7 Oct 92 04:41:02 GMT
Organization: COW Pastures

v070p6nd@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Anthos) writes:

> Actually, there is no contradiction regarding Data's head if you expand your
> statement to include all the facts, instead of deleting most of them.  Data's
> head is found on Earth, as is a watch and a pistol(if I'm wrong here, sorry, 
> missed the begining of TA I).  The Big E takes all of the junk to be examined
> They conclude that at some time in their future, Data will be brought to the 
> past where he will 'die'.  They somehow get to the planet that houses the ali
> and beams dth them. Data has a phaze converter in him.  In examining out of 
> phaze, Data is sucked into the past.  When the Big E's crew decide to
> investigate what just happened to Data, they find a way to follow the aliens
> back. {now insert all events up to the mine shaft incident} Data and the rest
> up to this point have done NOTHING IN TRYING TO PREVENT DATA'S DEATH.  They 
> went back to see what the aliens were doing there, and eventually stop them, 
> not to investigate the appearance of Data's head.  This fact alone negates
> your "contradiction hypothesis".  But what proves that there is no contradict
> is the fact that NONE of the events in the future were altered by the visit t
> the past.  Why did the crew go back, to investigate the aliens' actions.  Why
> was Data's head found, in order to try to stop the aliens from escaping.  Why
> was Data even there, because he was transported there while investigating the
> aliens.  The investigation of the aliens was the cause, Data's head being fou
> was the effect.  No contradiction.  The finding of Data's head was the effect
> being in the past, which was an effect of investigating the aliens.  One caus
> two effects, one 'short range' (Data blowing up in the past), the other 'long
> range'(the finding of the 500 yr old Data head).

        Time's Arrow also partially explains why Guinan did not feel
that things where write in Yesterday's Enterprise.  If the Federation
was having a big war with the Klingons, why were they fooling around
with alien time travelers.  Her deep rooted instincts told her that the
alternate time line was not correct and thus made the suggestion that
the Enterprise C be sent back into the temporal rift.  May be, may be
not, but it could explain why she was able to sense shifts in linear
time (Data's pseudobabble).

--
Charles Stephens, SysOp
COW Pastures BBS,
Kennesaw, GA  +1 404 421 0764
cfs@cowpas.waffle.atl.ga.us
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: noel@umbc2.umbc.edu
Subject: A silly Top 10 List
Organization: University of Maryland Baltimore County
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 17:48:23 GMT

	Okay, so last week's list wasn't very funny.  That's what I get for 
writing a list when I am tired.  Becuase of a new job I will be posting the Top 
10 list SUNDAY NIGHT from now on.  If you have any other suggestions please let 
me know.
	So from the home office in Arbutus Maryland, we bring you:

TOP 10 SIGNS THE ENTERPRISE HAS PICKED UP A BAD EMBASSADOR

10.  Beams aboard with a bunch of crates saying "don't worry about food, I 
     brought my own"

9.  Casually asks for a lot of technical information and if by any chance
    they are going near the Neutral Zone

8.  They become attracted to Troi

7.  Keeps playing "pull my finger" with Data

6.  Complains to Dr. Crusher about the poor quality of replicated blood

5.  Spends a lot of time in the holodeck with Barclay's programs

4.  Someone accidentally bumps into him and half the crew mysteriously
    slips into a coma

3.  Asks Alexander if he's ever watched Gladiator movies

2.  Inquires about Federation laws regarding paternity suits

and the number one sign the Enterprise picked up a Bad embassador

1.  When they zoon in the embassador for more than 3 seconds in the opening
From: 00gdwessel@bsu-ucs.uucp
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Stardate Conversion?
Date: 13 Oct 92 16:38:53 GMT

Just a quickie...

How the Hell do you determine Stardates?!??!   (EX:  What's the SD for
10/13/92??)

Thanx...

-- 

===============================================================================
NAME: Geoff Wessel  ALIASES: Weasel, Cerebus, f**khead, schmuck, "Hey you," etc.
00GDWESSEL       00GDWESSEL@BSUVC.BSU.EDU       UNIX: front242@bsu-cs.bsu.edu
===============================================================================
"I hate you/Talkin' to myself/Everybody's starin' at me/I'm only bleedin'".....
						-- FAITH NO MORE
===============================================================================
From: benjie@quack.sac.ca.us (Android)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Startrek Reality, Comments wanted
Date: 13 Oct 92 00:21:18 GMT
Organization: The Duck Pond public unix: +1 408 249 9630, log in as 'guest'.

I will be doing a physics/science report on the realitism of Startrek.
All comments and related articles are welcome, I will mention your name
in my report.
Ben

-- 
     BBB		Benjie Chen
    BCCCB 		benjie@quack.sac.ca.us
    BCCCB		No Axiomatic System Could Produce All Number-
     BBB		Theoretical Truths, Unless It Is Inconsistent.
From: 00gdwessel@bsu-ucs.uucp
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: German "Star Trek"
Date: 13 Oct 92 02:43:50 GMT

In article <tomcat.718663452@cwis>, tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu (Jeffrey S. Jo) writes:
> rfd@po.CWRU.Edu (Richard F. Drushel) writes:
> 
> 
>>	A request for those in NetLand who watch "Star Trek" dubbed
>>into German...Could someone please post the German translation of
>>the famous "Space...the final frontier" opening?  Knowing some
>>German, I have an idea how one might translate it, but I would like
>>to see what is actually being used.  Vielen Dank!
>>-- 
> 
> 
> English to German translation of the intro to ST:TNG:
> 
>     DAS ALL, DIE ENDGULTIGE GRENZE.  DIES SIND DIE REISEN VOM STARSHIP
> ENTERRPRISE.  SEIN STETIGER AUFTRAG IS FREMDE, NEUE WEITEN ZU ERFORSCHEN, 
> NACH NEUEM LEBEN UND NEUEN ZIVILLISATIONEN ZU SUCHEN UND ES ZU WAGEN DORTHIN
> ZU GEHEN WO NOCH KEIN MENSCH ZUVOR GEWESEN IST.
> 
> 	No, I do speak a word of german,  I got this off of one of the
> Foreign Language cards from the ST:TNG inaugural card set.
> 

Then it should be noted that there are some errors in that "translation" from
the cards....

First off, "STARSHIP" should be "Raumschiff" (G: "Raum"=space, room; 
"Schiff"=ship)

Second, there is no "is" auf Deutsch.  It should be "ist."


There's another one, but I can't think of it offhand....             
> 
> --
> |Jeffrey S. Jo                   |	         F-14D Tomcat                 |
> |Computer Operations		 |             VF-142 Ghostriders             |
> |University of Nebraska at Omaha |       United States Navy F-14 Tomcat       |
> |tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu         |              Fighter Squadron              |
-- 

===============================================================================
NAME: Geoff Wessel  ALIASES: Weasel, Cerebus, f**khead, schmuck, "Hey you," etc.
00GDWESSEL       00GDWESSEL@BSUVC.BSU.EDU       UNIX: front242@bsu-cs.bsu.edu
===============================================================================
"I hate you/Talkin' to myself/Everybody's starin' at me/I'm only bleedin'".....
						-- FAITH NO MORE
===============================================================================
From: kfr@pro-freedom.cts.com (Kurt Roithinger)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: German "Star Trek"
Date: 11 Oct 92 16:40:10 GMT
Article-I.D.: pro-free.1992Oct11.094010.2617
Organization: ProLine [pro-freedom] AppleVan (Apple UG of Vancouver, WA)

german contraction? huh? what? when did this happen?
i'm not quite sure what you mean with that (refresh my memory: what exactly
do you consider a german contraction?). if you mean the everpopular
"umlaut", i would say he should have no problem using it. it's only
phonetics, after all. i don't see why any foreign language should be a
problem for him. i think the reason he doesn't use contractions is because
he was programmed to speak the way he does. if it would be the proper use
within the standard parameters to use something like a contraction then he
most likely would be able to use it. since contractions aren't exactly the
most proper thing in the english language he isn't able to use them. the
real question is: if data were stranded in switzerland - could he speak
the german dialect that some swiss use?

ProLine:  kfr@pro-freedom
Internet: kfr@pro-freedom.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-freedom!kfr
==============================================================
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: Otto Heuer #3 <ottoh3@cfsmo.honeywell.com>
Subject: TREK RATE results (MOVIES)
To: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Posted-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 00: 02:28 -0500
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 05:02:28 GMT
Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 00: 01:46 CDT

This is one of seven periodic postings for ratings of Star Trek in all flavors:

TREK RATE ballot           - for sending in your votes!
TREK RATE results (TAS)    - what the USENET community thought of TAS eps
TREK RATE results (DS9)    - what the USENET community thought of DS9 eps
TREK RATE results (BOOKS)  - what the USENET community thought of the novels
TREK RATE results (MOVIES) - what the USENET community thought of the movies
TREK RATE results (TNG)    - what the USENET community thought of TNG eps
TREK RATE results (TOS)    - what the USENET community thought of TOS eps
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first is the ballot for sending in your votes (see it for details).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The last five postings contain the average rating for  each episode, movie,
book, etc.  according to the Usenet population.  It is  useful for deciding
which books to read (weed out the one that NO one enjoyed), what episode of
TNG people thought was the best (or worst), etc.

In the list below, RATE is the average rating on a scale of 0 to  1, NUM is
the number of votes  in the  database, and  EPISODE NAME  is (surprise) the
episode name with type  (A=TAS B=book D=DS9 M=movie N=TNG O=TOS)  in paren-
thesis.



 RATE NUM                     EPISODE NAME
----- --- ------------------------------------------------------------
0.322  83 STAR TREK V:  THE FINAL FRONTIER (M) 
0.501  87 STAR TREK:  THE MOTION PICTURE (M) 
0.652  84 STAR TREK III:  THE SEARCH FOR SPOCK (M) 
0.771  88 STAR TREK IV:  THE VOYAGE HOME (M) 
0.806  50 STAR TREK VI:  THE UNDISCOVERED COUNTRY (M) 
0.876  84 STAR TREK II:  THE WRATH OF KHAN (M) 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: ys3359@thor.albany.edu (Yazmasterj)
Subject: Re: McCoy Quotes Wanted
Organization: State University of New York at Albany
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 92 03:59:36 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.122926.1@cubldr.colorado.edu> matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu writes:
>BTW, I have a friend who insists that McCoy once said "I'm a doctor, not a 
>moon-shuttle conductor,", but I haven't been able to track that one down.

That is from "The Corbomite Maneuver" I believe.  It was when Kirk is
taking his physical in sickbay and the Red Alert light comes on.  McCoy
doesn't say anything and Kirk gets testy when he finds out.  Then McCoy
comes out with the moon shuttle conductor line.

Yasmin

**************************************************************************
*                                   *                                    *
*  Yasmin Sohrawardy                *  "Only Nixon can go to China"      *
*                                   *                                    *
*  Internet:  ys3359@csc.albany.edu *            - Ancient Vulcan        *
*                                   *              Proverb               *
**************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: holger@vmars.tuwien.ac.at (Holger Reusch (Dipl. Gerhard + Joe))
Subject: Re: German "Star Trek"
Organization: Technical University Vienna, Dept. for Realtime Systems, AUSTRIA
Distribution: intergalactic
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 12:11:30 GMT

As far as I know, _ST:TNG_ is not yet translated into German.  At least
the plethora of German/Austrian/Swiss TV channels I am able to receive
did not air the series so far (maybe I missed some scrambled sattelite
channel).

kfr@pro-freedom.cts.com (Kurt Roithinger) writes:
>here's my translation:
>das all...die endgueltige grenze.
>dies sind die reisen vom raumshiff enterprise (the card says "starship" but
>i swear to god it is incorrect).

Right, "starship" is BS.

>sein stetiger auftrag ist fremde, neue welten zu erforschen, nach neuen
>leben und neuen zivilisationen zu suchen und es zu wagen dorthin zu gehen
>wo noch kein mensch zuvor gewesen ist.

>(this is mainly from memory...i've been back in the us for some five years
>now, so it may not be 100% accurate...corrections are appreciated)

The intro text in _ST:TOS_ runs as follows (I'm quoting from memory, so
don't nail me on every word.):

"Der Weltraum - Unendliche Weiten.  Wir schreiben das Jahr 2xxx [Drat!
 I forgot!].  Dies sind die Abenteuer des Raumschiffs Enterprise,
 seiner Mission, fremde Welten zu erforschen, nach neuem Leben und
 neuen Zivilisationen zu suchen und dorthin zu gehen, wo nie ein Mensch
 zuvor gewesen ist."

I'd wager that they will translate the "continuing mission" of the TNG
intro to "seiner neuen Mission", because you can't say "continuing" in
German without sounding dry and learned ("weitere" oder "fortgesetzte"
would be possible alternatives).

-- 
| Holger Reusch                             |
| Technical University of Vienna, Austria <-+--- No kangaroos here,
| Dept. for Real-Time Systems               |    sorry!
| holger@vmars.tuwien.ac.at                 |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder)
Subject: Re: McCoy Quotes Wanted
Keywords: monKEY, turKEY, donKEY, KEYboard
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 14:27:09 GMT

In article <Bw0KqD.EFu@acsu.buffalo.edu> v070p6nd@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Anthos) writes:
>In article <1992Oct12.124021.9815@bradford.ac.uk>, K.Haigh-Hutchinson@bradford.ac.uk (K.HAIGH-HUTCHINSON) writes...

>>In article <1992Oct07.192158.3869@admiral.uucp> dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman) writes:
>>>In article <BvoLur.4r@acsu.buffalo.edu> v070p6nd@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Anthos) writes:
>
>[stuff deleted]
>
>>'I am a Dr. not a bricklayer'
>> 
>>Not too sure about 'Dammit Jim'. Would fit the character but did
>>1960's TV allow it?
>Yes, they did.  Censoring looks at words and direct meaning.  "Damn it!"
>wouldn't pass, but apparently "Dammit" did.  But I'm an anti-censor so they
>can all...


However, McCoy never said "dammit, Jim!" until the movies.  But Dan
Akroyd did this years before the movies and I think it stuck.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Schroeder  		|  
schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov         |             Boo. 
Brookhaven National Laboratory  | 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: g92n3258@giraffe.ru.ac.za (MR RL NICOL)
Subject: BEST TEASERS????
Organization: Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 12:24:43 GMT

I'm not sure if this has been done yet, but we've already had people talking 
about their favourite episodes, endings, actors, etc.  So here are, in my 
opinion, the best and worst teasers...

BEST:
TOS: Tomorrow is Yesterday - something different, what with the Enterprise 
			     being reported as a UFO.
     Mirror, Mirror        - A cruel Spock with a beard?  I was immediately 
			     hooked to this episode.
     Day of the Dove  	   - I don't know why, I just enjoy it.

TNG: Conspiracy            - The first time we are given the suggestion of a 
			     worthy foe on TNG, besides Lore in Datalore.
     Contagion  	   - The Romulans are back, and may have something 
			     to do with destroying a starship, again hooked.
     Yesterdays Enterprise - Shouldn't even have to explain.

WORST:
TOS: Miri    		   - "Another Earth!"; puhlease!
     Catspaw		   - No need to explain this either, I should hope.
TNG: Too numerous to mention, but:
     Haven 		   - Gripping stuff! (Sarcasm it definitely is!)
     Where No One Has Gone Before - Could tell it was going to be terrible.

Ryan
From: wsinjv@rw9.urc.tue.nl (John Voesten)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Forsale, complete Star trek TOS and Anim and more...
Date: 16 Oct 92 14:51:48 GMT
Reply-To: wsinjv@urc.tue.nl
Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands

Well, I'm doing this for a friend who's dumping his Video-recordings
(PAL VHS), so if possible contact him about it.

79 episodes of the old series
22 episodes of the animated series
5 Motion pictures
Pilot STTNG (Encounter at farpoint)

Offers should be sent to:

Rene van Os
Breemakker 1
5741 ME Beek & Donk

(He's switching to LaserDisc in case you're wondering...)

							_John


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Voesten Jr.  |'Is it true that in Holland all the windmills wear clogs?'
wsinjv@urc.tue.nl |'No,but sometimes we have to put a tulip in the dike.'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dianetti@acsu.buffalo.edu (Donald J. Dianetti)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Definitely not legal (was: Legal?)
Summary: Thanks for the info
Date: 8 Oct 92 21:39:17 GMT
Organization: UB

In article <1992Oct8.143417.23425@hellgate.utah.edu> jwindley%asylum.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Jay Windley) writes:
>dianetti@acsu.buffalo.edu (Donald J. Dianetti) writes:
>>Sorry if this is a stupid question, but:
>>
>>Is it horrendously illegal for people to post Star Trek scripts
>>(from the movies or series) to the newsgroup?
>
>Yes, it is horrendously illegal.  Statutory copyright includes the
>license to publish, and posting them here constitutes publication in
>the legal sense.  Unless you receive permission from Paramount, the
>copyright holder, you would be breaking the law.
>
I am the original poster.

Thanks for the information, everybody.  It IS most definitely
illegal.  So much for my career as a copyright lawyer :-).


-- 
Don Dianetti  --  SUNY at Buffalo  --  dianetti@acsu.buffalo.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------