From: gsmith@clio.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith)
Subject: Re: Liberal Agenda
Organization: IWR, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 14:33:11 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.210035.22702@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>
jpsb@gothamcity.jsc.nasa.gov (Jim Shirreffs) writes:

>Conservatives are going to be faced with the greatest onslaught of liberal
>values that we have ever seen. Our basic principles are going to be attacked.

Poor baby.  Maybe you should move to Paraguay.

>The current liberal target is the military. Perhaps the strongest conservative
>organization in the country. They are going to attack our strongest point.
>Many good men will resign. (Thank you very much Ad. Crowe).

The military is supposed to be nonpolitical.  Its function has nothing
to do with helping conservatives screw up the country.

>        1) Gay Rights .... The Liberals will legitimize the homosexual life
>                style. Homo-sexual marriages will have the same legal status
>                as tradition male-female marriages. Homo-sexuals will be
>                able to adopt children and file tax returns joinly. Sex
>                education in PUBLIC schools will teach gay, lesbian, and
>                heterosexual techniques.

There isn't a hyphen in homosexual, a fact which the new evil school
system will no doubt also teach.

>        This of course will be the end of the traditional family as we
>        know it.

Why?

>        By the way how come Mr Clinton is not protecting the
>        rights of straight men and women to privacy in the military?

How come the military isn't protecting the rights of straight men and
women to privacy in the military?  Recently an airman got seven months
in jail and a bad-conduct discharge for having oral sex with his
girlfriend in private off-base.  I know sexual fascist like you love
this kind of stuff, but it isn't protection of privacy.

It isn't protection of privacy when a bunch of drunks harass women
in the military and the top brass try to cover it up, either.

But of course, since these guys are all good conservative protectors
of values, I suppose that didn't happen?

>        Why will straight mem and women be forced to undress, shower,
>        and sleep with people that find them sexually appealing?

They already do.

>	 Do not tell me that this is not where the liberals are going to
>	take the country! I can add two and two.

I'm glad to hear there is some lower bound to your intellectual
attainments.

>        2) Womens rights .... The liberals what to give women the right
>        to choose to go into combat. What about men? Why don't we get
>        a choice?

You do, Bozo.  If you don't want to go into combat, don't join.

>        3) Taxes on the affluent .... Liberals will of course tax all
>        Americans capable of paying, the only question is how much?

Is this worse than letting the affluent *not* pay taxes?

>        Liberals says only people earning $200,000 plus. I don't
>        believe it, but time will tell. Don't affluent people have a right
>        to the money they earn?

Yes, of course.  Everyone earning over $200000 a year should not pay
taxes at all.

>        4) Access to health care .... Liberals want to make health care
>        accessible to all, a noble goal, the result with be that America
>        health care will be like our public schools, our post office.
>        Everyone will be servered equally poorly.

Yeah yeah.  Try living in a country with this dreaded socialized medicine
sometime.  It seems to work a lot better than our system does.

>        5) Procecution of Conservitives officals ... Although no one
>        is talking about it, I fully expect the liberals in power to
>        procecute presidents Reagan and Bush for thier part in Iran-Contra.

Well, the Justice Department and the FBI are already investigating 
each other.  I thought you conservative looneys were big on law
and order.

>        6) Rewrite History .... Already we are being told that the last
>        four years was the worst period since the great depression.

You got an argument they weren't?

>It seems that that soon will be no wrong and no right, no common bases for
>collective mores.

There are better bases for religion and morality than "tradition is
always right".  That's what the Ayatollahs of the world think, the
Inquisitors and the fanatics.
-- 
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/IWR/Ruprecht-Karls University 
               gsmith@kalliope.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh