HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: "james kewageshig" <james.kewageshig@canrem.com>
Subject: blade runner / violen
Reply-To: "james kewageshig" <james.kewageshig@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 12 Nov 92 01:31:20 EST

jk87377@cc.tut.fi (Juhana Kouhia) writes:
(cool initials... ;) )

JK>Uh oh.
JK>When I saw the released version I got feeling about cutting
JK>violence away in following places (at least); I'm not sure
JK>is there violence in all these places, but somehow I feel
JK>that they were is Director's cut when I saw it.

JK>1. Leon shoot the interviewer
Same as European version

JK>2. Eye maker
Same as European version, from what I remember.

JK>3. Tyrell's eyes
Cut out of the DC version.

JK>4. Acrobatic female who is shot by Deckard
I believe he shots her 3 times in the Eur. vers.  Only 2 in DC.

Also, I don't think in the DC version has the shot where Pris
picks up Deckard by the nose.

JK>By the way, the current Director's cut is not Ridley's,
JK>instead it is made by a film archive man at film company.
JK>Ridley's version was lost. (Maybe you allready knew that.)

Whoah, where did yo hear this?!!
 _________________________________________________________________________ 
|0 ___ ___  ____  ____  ____                                             0|\
|   \ \//    ||    ||    ||                James Kewageshig               |\|
|   _\//_   _||_  _||_  _||_      UUCP: james.kewageshig@canrem.uucp      |\|
|   N E T W E R K    V I I I    INET: james.kewageshig%canrem@lsuc.on.ca  |\|
|0_______________________________________________________________________0|\|
 \_________________________________________________________________________\|
---
  DeLuxe 1.25 #8086  Head of Co*& XV$# Hi This is a signature virus. Co
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Terminator II *flaw*
Date: 12 Nov 92 15:12:50 GMT
Organization: DB and ES Subdivision, TU Vienna

From article <1992Nov9.213828.27459@eecs.nwu.edu>, by kaufman@eecs.nwu.edu (Michael L. Kaufman):
> In article <96641@netnews.upenn.edu> worthm@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Mike Worth) writes:
>>T1, when Michael Biehn says that only living tissue can go through the vortex.
>>Ok, to how did the T1000 go through? 

> Well, don't be too smug. 

I agree.  Obviously, the T1000 shares something with living beings,
namely a capability to reorganize at or close to the molecular level.
That might be sufficient to repair damage that causes dead stuff to be
useless after going through.  If the damage starts from the outside,
this would also explain why a cover of living flesh was sufficient to
protect the T-101.

-- 
Markus Stumptner                                mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
University of Technology Vienna                 vexpert!mst@relay.eu.net
Paniglg. 16, A-1040 Vienna, Austria             ...mcsun!vexpert!mst
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: sdt8s@curry.edschool.Virginia.EDU (Steve Tilson)
Subject: Re: Terminator II *flaw*
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 02:58:02 GMT

worthm@eniac.seas.upenn.edu  writes:
> 
> Not to be smug, but I have found a *major* error in T2. Ok, time travel back to
> T1, when Michael Beihn says that only living tissue can go through the vortex.
> Ok, to how did the T1000 (which is made of liquid metal and went through the
> vortex right after the terminator in T1) go through? He should have been 
> unable to get through. Think about it.
> 	-Mikey

NOT AGAIN.
NOT AGAIN.
NOT AGAIN.

Who has the T2 FAQ?
--
From: mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Deckard WAS a replicant!
Date: 12 Nov 92 15:08:08 GMT
Organization: DB and ES Subdivision, TU Vienna

From article <1992Nov10.024222.5554@access.usask.ca>, by donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald):
> Remember the fight seen between Leon and Deckard?  OK, at one point, when 
> [...] why didn't Leon punch right through him.

> PS: Please don't say Leon was pulling his punches.  

Why not?  Afraid of the truth?  :-)

> In a fight for my life, I wouldn't; why should he?

Because at that point, he is not fighting for his life.  You would be,
but you don't have his strength and and speed.  He is playing with
Deckard in a quite similar manner to what Roy at the end of the film
(though Roy comes to a different conclusion).  Leon has Deckard at his
mercy and wants him alive for the moment to make a point (classic
mistake of all villains).

> In a fight for my life, I wouldn't; why should he?

In a fight for my life, I wouldn't start explaining to my opponent how
it is to live in fear either (and neither would you, I guess).  But
Leon does, because he is sure Deckard won't escape once he lost his
gun (which happened right at the outset).  When he has made his little
speech, he moves to kill Deckard.  This is the moment when Rachel
fires.

-- 
Markus Stumptner                                mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
University of Technology Vienna                 vexpert!mst@relay.eu.net
Paniglg. 16, A-1040 Vienna, Austria             ...mcsun!vexpert!mst
From: mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: I Liked Alien 3
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:26:32 GMT
Organization: DB and ES Subdivision, TU Vienna

From article <1992Nov6.214806.7413@netcom.com>, by barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry):
> In article <6087@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner) writes:
>>Do you know how birds reproduce?  Or lizards?
 
> 	Yeah. They lay small clutches of eggs which they keep in their
> own individual nest.

So, if mammy disappears, the eggs stay alone.  And if you have the
right species, the eggs will hatch without her.  Say, crocodiles and
turtles.  Both lay eggs, one in nests, the other without, neither care
for the eggs.  In summary, the knee-jerk reaction "if there's eggs,
there must be a hive" is probably based on too many Aliens viewings
(not that I haven't had a lot of these, but this whole discussion is
about keeping things in perspective).

> Having thousands of eggs lined up like soldiers in
> a giant chamber pretty much screams "hive" at me

Actually, it screams "storeroom" at me.  But that's another
discussion. :-)

-- 
Markus Stumptner                                mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
University of Technology Vienna                 vexpert!mst@relay.eu.net
Paniglg. 16, A-1040 Vienna, Austria             ...mcsun!vexpert!mst
From: joel@upchrch.UUCP (Joel Upchurch  )
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Predator/Minigun question
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 17:14:49 EST
Organization: Upchurch Computer Consulting, Orlando FL

fiddler@concertina.Eng.Sun.COM (steve hix) writes:

> The original proof-of-concept for the Vulcan aerial cannon (6000 rounds
> per minute 20mm cannon) was done by tacking an electric motor on to an
> original Gatling gun from the turn of the century.
> 
> A few spare parts and a borrowed gun from some collection and General
> Electric had a whole new line of business.

It should have been pretty easy. My references indicate that Gatling
himself did this in 1893 and managed to drive his gun at 3000 rounds
per minute.

(If your mail bounces use the address below.)
Joel Upchurch/Upchurch Computer Consulting/718 Galsworthy/Orlando, FL 32809
joel@peora.ccur.com {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd,ucf-cs}!peora!joel (407) 859-0982
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: geirj@hsr.no (Geir Johannessen)
Subject: The Abyss Special Edition LD?
Keywords: The Abyss, LD
Organization: Rogaland University Centre
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 09:55:11 GMT

Hi!

A friend of mine owns a LaserDisc player, and he's interested in buying the
special edition of THE ABYSS (99.99 UK pounds at Movie Boulevard in UK). However,
he'd like to know more about what the 'special edition' tag implies in this case.

For example, does the special edition feature the cut scenes (the giant tidal
wave from the end for example), and if so, are they incorporated into the film,
or are they presented on an extra disc (like ALIEN Special Edition). Are there
any other extras?

Please respond via e-mail as I'm not a regular reader of this newsgroup.

       ////////   ///////    ////////   Geir Friestad, Norway
     ///        ///   ///  ///        Internet address for
    ///        ///   ///  ///        the brave ones :
    ////////   ///////    ////////  geirj@hsr.no

Reality is for people who can't face anime / Death to bootleggers!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: cs386122@ucs.usl.edu (Mejia Pablo J.)
Subject: Re: Alternate endings to movies
Organization: Univ. of Southwestern La., Lafayette
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:09:25 GMT

In article <9211092326.AA08816@rutgers.edu> MB05704@swtexas.BITNET writes:
>I can't remember if this one has been mentioned yet or not,
>(recently absorbed alot of information :) but ROCKY HORROR
>PICTURE SHOW has two different endings depending on whether
>or not you see the American or European release.
>
>The difference is that the European release includes the
>song "Superheroes".
>
>Michael Bruno
>MB05704@SWTEXAS.EDU
>
>p.s.  Did I mention I'm new to the digest?
>

    What????

   I've seen RHPS a few times (about 60) and EVERY time I've seen it
  "Superheroes" plays right after the castle has lifted off.....

   (I saw it in Germany while I was an Army type stationed there...
    nothing more fun than shouting the comeback lines in English
    when the movie is in german........)


                 Allen
From: kaufman@eecs.nwu.edu (Michael L. Kaufman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Terminator II *flaw*
Date: 9 Nov 92 21:38:28 GMT
Organization: EECS Department, Northwestern University

In article <96641@netnews.upenn.edu> worthm@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Mike Worth) writes:
>Not to be smug, but I have found a *major* error in T2. Ok, time travel back to
>T1, when Michael Beihn says that only living tissue can go through the vortex.
>Ok, to how did the T1000 (which is made of liquid metal and went through the
>vortex right after the terminator in T1) go through? He should have been 
>unable to get through. Think about it.

Well, don't be too smug. There are a number of simple explanations for this.
My personal favorite is, Michael Beihn was wrong. As he went on to say, he was
not a technition, and he didn't really understand the process. Perhaps it was
more complicated then he knew. 

Michael


-- 
Michael Kaufman | I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on
 kaufman        | fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in
  @eecs.nwu.edu | the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be
                | lost in time - like tears in rain. Time to die.     Roy Batty
From: mike@childsoc.demon.co.uk (Michael Bernardi)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Sneakers Press Pack
Date: 12 Nov 92 13:33:45 GMT
Reply-To: mike@childsoc.demon.co.uk
Organization: The Children's Society
X-Mailer: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.18)

On TV (in the UK) a little while ago, I heard that the Press Pack for the
film Sneakers was actually on disk, and that it was available "generally.
Has anyone heard of this, and know how I could get a copy. Sneakers opens in
the UK tomorrow.
                TIA
                Mike
-- 
 Michael Bernardi        mike@childsoc.demon.co.uk (Internet) | Making lives
 The Children's Society, Edward Rudolf House, Margery Street, | worth living
 London, WC1X 0JL, UK    Voice: +44 71 837 4299    Charity Reg. No. 221124
From: rjs@citi.umich.edu (Robert J. Skrobola)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Re: Goosebumpers! (was Deckard at 6th....)
Date: 6 Nov 1992 18:58:24 GMT
Organization: Center for Information Technology Intergration, University of Michigan
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: bodwin.citi.umich.edu

In article <1992Oct29.234521.26988@u.washington.edu>, redrum@carson.u.washington.edu (Joe Stremick) writes:
|> 	from The Silence of the Lambs:

|> 		Another one:
|> 		We realize that the man on top of the elevator is
|> not Lecter, we cut to the ambulance, where the paramedic is speaking
|> on the radio, we pan to the patient, who pulls the fake face off and
|> reveals his true identity as he sits up, the music climaxes. . . 

Good scene, but...it's a real face. Just not his.
		Rob


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Rob Skrobola      Institutional File Server Project
Normal Disclaimer: I speak only for myself
-----------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: kenl@origami.cc.bellcore.com (Ken Lehner)
Subject: Re: computers in films
Organization: Bellcore
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 16:15:43 GMT

How about "computer" in Star Trek? ;-)
From: donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Deckard WAS a replicant!
Date: 10 Nov 92 02:42:22 GMT
Organization: University of Saskatchewan

johnh@prism.CS.ORST.EDU (John Holeman) writes:

>In article <1992Nov9.132651.24710@sarah.albany.edu> gm1116@albnyvms.bitnet writes:
>>

>The other part of the arguement that has been tossed around here is the 
>briefing where the captain tells Deckard about the 6 replicants.  In the DC
>when Deckard tries to walk out for the first time, the captain say there are
>4 skin jobs.  During the video of Leon, he says that 6 escaped(3 male 3 female)
>and that one got fried trying to break into Tyrell.  After Leon, he showed 
>Deckard the info on Roy, the Zhora, the Pris, refering to Pris as the 4th
>skin job.  I believe that Holden probably got one of the replicants before 
>Leon got him(Deckard said he was good).  No support to that, just a personal 
>belief.

Ok, make way for the amateur... 

I've only seen BR a couple of times, but one thing has always bothered me... 

Remember the fight seen between Leon and Deckard?  OK, at one point, when 
Leon's beating on Deckard, he punches _through_ a big, steel trash bin.  Then, 
one or two scenes later, the hits Deckard two or three times in the stomach and
chest area.  If Deckard is not a replicant, why didn't he "splash", ie, why 
didn't Leon punch right through him.

Thanks.

PS: Please don't say Leon was pulling his punches.  In a fight for my life, I 
wouldn't; why should he?

Dave
-- 
| donald@dvinci.usask.ca		|  "Total protonic reversal.  Ok,    | 
| Communications Systems Research Group | that's BAD.  Good safety tip, Igon |
| University of Saskatchewan		|  Thanks." - Peter Venkman, aka     |
| Saskatoon, Canada                     |  Bill Murray, Ghostbuster supreme. |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: 4224_5201@uwovax.uwo.ca (Dark Lord of the Sith)
Subject: Re: Galaxina    
Organization: University of Western Ont, London
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 20:39:05 GMT

In article <9211092330.AA09359@rutgers.edu>, MB05704@swtexas.BITNET writes:
> I'm sure this is a long dead topic, but was GALAXINA
> ever included in the list of classic space operas?
> I don't remember anyone ever mentioning it.  I think
> of this movie as the definative space opera.
> 
> Michael Bruno
> MB05704@SWTEXAS.EDU

You're kidding, right. I saw Galaxina on Toronto's CITY TV. It is slow,
the effects are real shoddy, and you never get to see Canada's own Dorothy
Stratten showing off her assets. One of the dumbest movies of all time
(now that is a reason to watch it!)

-- 

John P. LaRocque
4224_5201@uwovax.uwo.ca

"Farm chores sure could be dull, and Luke Skywalker was bored beyond belief.
He yearned for adventures out among the stars - adventures that would take him
beyond the furthest galaxies to distant and alien worlds.

"But Luke got more than he bargained for..."
                            from Star Wars the paperback (1976, first edition)

"Urk..urk..."
"Apologies accepted", Darth Vader
From: kiniry@giane.cs.umass.edu (Joe Kiniry)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: GODZILLA NEWS
Keywords: Godzilla Monster Japan
Date: 8 Nov 92 20:02:16 GMT
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

In article <9140@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>, swhst1+@pitt.edu (Steven W Herer) writes:
|> >I take it that Minya has grown up a little since the old days. I remember the
|> >tyke having some problems with full-grown monsters, in the past. 
|> >Still find it hard to think of Godzilla as "Mom", but that's me!
|> >I keep seeing references to Minya being called "Godzooky" or some such
|> >in America, but I have never actualy seen it used. Anyone know if such a
|> >stupid name was ever used for the character?
|> >
|> 
|> I seem to remember the animated cartoon series for Godzilla using the name
|> Godzooky for his son.  I believe it aired on NBC on Saturday mornings during
|> the early 1980's.
|> 		Steve Herer

I do believe that Godzooky was actually just Scrappy-Do in his halloween
costume!  <grin>

---joe
 
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.movies:8556 rec.arts.movies:32345 alt.cult-movies:10138
From: gunnarh@dhhalden.no (GUNNAR HORRIGMO)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies,rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Deckard as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Date: 8 Nov 92 19:41:21 GMT
Organization: Ostfold College

Why don't we all just cut the shit and agree on the fact fact that every 
character in the entire film was replicants. Don't argue and say the some 
passed the test. The machine was simply bugged.


          /\           | I didn't say this.      | "When there's no 
        /    \         | My supervisor would     |  more room in hell,
      /        \       | kill me if i did.       |  the dead will     
    /    (<>)    \     |_________________________|  walk the earth."
  /                \   |Gunnar Horrigmo          |
/____________________\ |gunnarh@sofus.dhhalden.no| 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: dave@blackbox.cc.columbia.edu (David Milner)
Subject: Re: Godzooky Is A Toon!!!
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:41:54 GMT

In article <BxItqG.6tE@acsu.buffalo.edu> rjking@acsu.buffalo.edu (Randall J. King) writes:
>jajohnston@ualr.edu writes:
>
>>  When I read the comments about Godzooky, I was forced to remember the animated
>>Godzilla cartoons with the miniture flying dinosaur in it who blew out smoke
>>rings.  This show had Godzilla helping a group of humans, with whom Godzooky
>>lived, on a Hydrafoil.  Does this ring any bells?  I hope I have helped you
>>with your question, and am looking forward to renting Godzilla (any) in the
>>near future.
>
>I remember that show.  But that came a long time after the movie with Godzooky.
>I have a question though.  What does Godzilla mean (I forgot) and what in god's
>name does Godzooky mean?  (pun intended)
>
>signing off from the satelite of love.....           ___   _____  ___
>	                                    |\  /|  |   \    |   /   \   |  / 
>rjking@acsu.buffalo.edu                     | \/ |   \       |       /   | /
>v050qrq3@cc.buffalo.edu	                    |    |    \      |    --<    |<
>                                            |    |     \     |       \   | \
>push the button Frank...                    |    |  \___|    |   \___/   |  \ 


The movie with Godzooky? There never was one. There were, however, three
films with Minya, the son of Godzilla, in them.

The name Godzilla was created by Toho. Why they chose it I don't know.

Gojira, the combination of the words 'gorilla' and 'kujira,' the Japanese
word for 'whale,' was the nickname of an oversized Toho employee.

David Milner  Columbia University
inet:   dave@blackbox.cc.columbia.edu
usenet: ...rutgers!columbia!blackbox!dave
        ...rutgers!columbia!blackbox.cc.columbia.edu!dave
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: rjn@FC.HP.COM (Bob Niland)
Subject: Re: Blade Runner / Violence, quoestion
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 21:57:26 GMT
Reply-To: rjn@FC.HP.COM
Organization: Hewlett-Packard/WSY Ft.Collins,CO,USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.8 PL6]

Juhana Kouhia (jk87377@cc.tut.fi) wrote:

> Does the director's cut 1992 of Blade Runner contain
> the violence in European release had?

No.

> In USA, the extra violence is available on Criterion disc.

Actually, apart from the aspect ratios (Criterions are wide), all the US
home video versions are the '82 Euro cut.

Regards,                                              Hewlett-Packard
Bob Niland      Internet: rjn@FC.HP.COM               3404 East Harmony Road
                CompuServe:  71044,2124               Ft Collins CO 80525-9599

This article represents only the opinion[s] of its author, and is not an
official or unofficial position of, or statement by, the Hewlett-Packard
Company.  The text is provided for informational purposes only.  It is
supplied without warranty of any kind.
From: smintz@sedona.intel.com (Stephen Mintz exp 11/92~)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: computers in films
Date: 5 Nov 1992 22:03:14 GMT
Organization: Intel Corporation
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: alamo.intel.com
Originator: smintz@alamo


In article <mwojcik-051192125743@college23.sas.upenn.edu>, mwojcik@mail.sas.upenn.edu (Michael Wojcik) writes:
> > 
> > i'm collecting a list of all the names computers have been given
> > in sf films (eg colossus from the 'forbin project')
> > how many can you remember??
> 
> Interesting. Please E Mail me a final list when your done. Pleeeaaase.
> 
> Anyway, I'll add a few sketchy ones.
> Also in War Games: W.O.P.R. (War Operations Planned Response)
> There are a lot in HHGTTG like ...Gargantubrain... I can look them up for
> tomorrow (I don't have a copy at work B^)  )
> In the Movie Electric Dreams, there was a PC that became AI, I don't know
> if it was named or not. Also, there was a Movie about an AI home system
> that went crazy and attacked the creators wife in an attempt to procreate
> (I think this was a Kirk Douglass movie) might be called something like
> "Demon Seed" there's a guy on rec.arts.cult.movies who calls himself JUDEX
> who might know that one.
> Try cross posting your request there: there is a similar thread going over
> there about Christmas movies.
> Good Luck!

The computer in Electric Dream was Edger!!:)
Stephen
From: rjs@citi.umich.edu (Robert J. Skrobola)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: GOOSEBUMPERS!
Date: 6 Nov 1992 19:07:11 GMT
Organization: Center for Information Technology Intergration, University of Michigan
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: bodwin.citi.umich.edu

In article <1992Nov2.135241.2554@jyu.fi>, mol@jyu.fi (Mika O. Latokartano) writes:
|> In article <alien.00na@acheron.amigans.gen.nz> alien@acheron.amigans.gen.nz (Ross Smith) writes:
|> >Here are some of my favourites...
|> >
|> >"Get away from her, you BITCH!"
|> 
|>   Opinions indeed differ.  I think this may be the worst line in the movie.
|>   (Not intended as a flame!)
|> 
Agreed. I thought it was the most...self-conscious (from the films POV) line in
the film. Didn't fit too well with my concept of Ripley. A line to help u remember
the movie, as if u needed any...
			Rob

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Rob Skrobola      Institutional File Server Project
Normal Disclaimer: I speak only for myself
-----------------------------------------------------
From: urf@icl.se (Urban F)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Q: Journey to Far Sid
Date: 6 Nov 92 06:38:14 GMT
Organization: None. On USENET I speak only for myself.

ratinox@splinter.coe.northeastern.edu (Richard Pieri/Stainless Steel Rat) writes:

>>>>>> "MS" == Morten Steinhauer <morten.steinhauer@thcave.no> writes:

>MP> 	Hey... wasn't "LV426" the ID of the stormtrooper that Luke
>  > 	stole his uniform from (in ANH)?

>MS>         I always thought (it's been a long time) that the line went:
>MS>         "THX-1138, why aren't you at your post", or something...

>][n the movie, it was "TK-427, why aren't you at your post." The
>novelization uses "THX-1138".

Then you didn't see the same version I did. Lucas seems to like
"THX-1138 / THX 138".
--
 Urban Fredriksson   urf@icl.se  (n.g.u.fredriksson.swe2001@oasis.icl.co.uk)
 I wonder if there is a universe where washing machines give away socks?