HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Vileness in Amerikkka--Anarchists are Democrats
Date: 18 Aug 92 21:14:34 GMT
Organization: Psych Department, Indiana University

sschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Susan E Schudt) writes:


>nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle) writes:
>>kucharsk@solbourne.com (William Kucharski) writes:
>>>Boy, Macintosh NNTP programs can be dangerous, can't they? (eci.bbb.cal?)

>>    Yeah, you can't trust any of those goofy Mac users (Sorry Rush)...

>Nathan!  Now you have REALLY offended me! ;)  I know I am goofy, but it's not 
>because I use a Mac, and I _am_ trustworthy! :)

    Nonsense. Your Mac use is an affront to all that's Sacred and Good.
Macs are the computer of choice among the Arts & Croisant crowd and you 
know what that means... liberalism. Yes, liberalism. And you claim you're 
trustworthy. 

;)

--
Nathan Engle                        Software Juggler
Psychology Department               Indiana University
nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu      nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu
From: eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Media Bias
Date: 12 Aug 92 16:32:14 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary L. Newell) writes:
:krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:
:> adamsr@netcom.com (Rick Adams) writes:
:> >	PRO = Favoring or supporting.
:> >	CHOICE = The power or right to choose.
:> 
:> BONK!  Wrong answer.  At least as far as the leaders of PP, NOW and NARAL 
:> are concerned.  All of there actions point in the direction of encouraging 
:> as many abortions to be performed as possible.  If they were indeed in 
:> favor of "choice" then they would not be opposed to fully-informing the 
:> pregnant woman of the condition of her perspective offspring.
:
:BZZZZZZZZTTTT!!!! Wrong Answer Ted! I think there are a couple of simple points
:that you have let slip by. For example, allowing a woman to *choose* to be, as
:you put it, "fully informed" is something that I believe many pro-choice folks
:would not mind at all - perhaps asking her if she would like to see the 
:presentation would meet the needs of both groups right? or are you saying
:that pro-lifers want/need to *force* a woman to undergo this form of state-
:induced education. Also, there is the obvious sexist, hidden agenda in your
:view which implies that women are somehow incapable of understanding the
:situation and must therefore be educated into the views of the pro-life
:movt.

No buzzers, please. I'll get into a cardiac arrest! :)

The question is "fully informed" about what? The "gag order" says that
federally-funded family planning clinics (I don't want to delve into
details. There was already a string about Title IX and so on.) could not
present abortion as an option for family planning.
	The perception I have about being "fully informed" when it comes
to unplanned pregnancy is that a woman who has sex and unexpectedly gets
pregnant and wants to get rid of the baby needs to be fully informed of
her options to get rid of the baby, NOT to plan a family. Why wasn't the
woman (and man with whom copulation was performed) fully knowledgeable
about the possibility of getting pregnant before sex? About birth
control (and its failures)? About AIDS? Being "fully informed" about sex
beforehand is a whole lot less expensive than being "fully informed"
with regards to pregnancy and abortion.
-- 
Emil Thomas Chuck		DUKE BLUE DEVILS: 1992 ACC CHAMPIONS!
Biomedical Engineer 1993	1992 EAST REGIONAL CHAMPIONS!!
Duke University, Durham, NC	AND 1992 NCAA NATIONAL CHAMPIONS!!!
August 31, 1992 - May 16, 1993	Duke football? What's that?
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.activism.d,alt.news-media
From: jswitzer@afit.af.mil (Chip Switzer)
Subject: Re: Media Bias
Organization: Air Force Institute of Technology
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 16:36:33 GMT

bboerner@novell.com (Brendan B. Boerner) writes:

>In article <1992Aug21.004257.6204@afit.af.mil> jswitzer@afit.af.mil (Chip Switzer) writes:
>>Like I have stated before, both labels where carefully chosen by each
>>group to have the greatest impact.  This debate is not about whether you
>>approve of the names.  It's about whether the news media blindly uses
>>whatever a liberal organization wants to be called and refuses to give
>>the same consideration to a conservative group (or idea).  

>Well, sure, whether I approve of the names or not is not the issue - my
>point is that maybe the "liberal" media has a reason for calling
>pro-choicer's "pro-choice" and pro-lifer's "anti-abortionist", which is
>they believe in calling groups by names more reflecting their true
>nature.  In this instance, they believe that saying "anti-abortion"
>more reflects what pro-lifer's mean to accomplish, and "pro-choice"
>accurately reflect that groups goals.  I'm not saying this is what
>actually happens, it's just an idea.

>>Examples abound.  How about the Peacekeeper missle?  The media wouldn't
>>have it.  They refused on idealogical grounds.  How about the Strategic
>>Defense Initiative?  It was immediately belittled by the media who to
>>this day call it the Star Wars program.  

>Again, maybe they didn't buy into the idea that is WAS a peacekeeper or
>that SDI WOULD provide a Strategic Defense.  If you believe you see a
>wolf in sheep's clothing, you don't call it a sheep, you call it a
>wolf.  And it is not just liberal who do this - pro-lifer's call
>pro-choicers "pro-abortionist".  I suppose this reinforces my point, in
>this case, pro-lifer's don't think the issue is about choice it's about
>ABORTION.

>>Before you liberals line up to say things like, "but it *shouldn't* be

>Ahh, I'm a liberal to a conservative and a conservative to a
>liberal.

The paragraph you left out of my post says it all...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you liberals line up to say things like, "but it *shouldn't* be
called a Peacekeeper because of this and that..." etc., remember what is
being discussed here.  The opinions you may have about whether or not a
certain label is valid only prove my point.  The media is also liberal
and refused to use the names for the exact same reasons.
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank-you for proving my point--even though I warned you about it.



Chip Switzer                            "A witty saying proves nothing." 
jswitzer@afit.af.mil                              -- Voltaire 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Available: Software Engineer or MIS. MSCE, 1 year C++, Unix Experience
	   Highly motivated, keeps political opinions at home!
	             Seattle area, only.  513-233-4502
From: dfriedman@misvax.mis.arizona.edu (D R Friedman)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections
Subject: Re: the Keating 5
Date: 13 Aug 92 20:25:00 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona MIS Department
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Aug13.162811.12863@umbc3.umbc.edu>, alex@umbc4.umbc.edu (Alex S. Crain) writes...
>In article <mykes.0ca9@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG> mykes@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG (Mike Schwartz) writes:
> 
>>Remember the Keating 5?  Where's all the unbiased news coverage of those
>>guys?  Note - they are still in office.  S&L, my butt :)
> 
> 
>					Alex Crain
>					UMBC Academic Computing Services

I live in Arizona where 2 out of the 5 Keating 5 are our elected officials.
Senator McCain is now doing PR spots for his re-election as being a foreign
policy expert and the big guy who will lead Arizona into greatness after
the passage of NAFTA.  Also senator McCain is going to give a rousing
speech for George Bush at the convention.  He is also banking on the
sympathy factor of being a POW.  

The other Senator who is a democrat is now environmentally conscious
and supports whoever is the president.  Senator DeConcini is a multi
millionaire and owns a lot of land especially around water projects
that Mr. Reagan authorized.

Both of these senators from Arizona in a lot of people's opinion, including
my own are crooks.  They are from both parties and symbolize what is
wrong with the political process these days.  The common person is
shut out by both parties.  They ought to combine both parties and
have one republicrat convention.

Then we could have choices like:

Bush/Clinton
Clinton/Kemp
Quayle/Gore
Gore/Baker
Baker/Quayle
Mrs.Clinton/Robert Dole
Mrs. Bush/Jerry Brown

Denny 
-------------------------------------
My .sig is broken and it wont post any more
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: kucharsk@solbourne.com (William Kucharski)
Subject: Re: Media Bias at Republican Convention
Organization: Solbourne Computer, Inc., Longmont, CO
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 22:31:09 GMT

While reading article <BtAty6.949@cgl.ucsf.edu>, I noticed that
brianc@jekyll.ucsf.edu (Brian Colfer) said the following:
 >I only watch CNN, PBS, and C-SPAN.  I know they all use the same
 >shots... I've seen the exact same coverage on all three.  If you are
 >talking about the "on the floor coverage" then it is the networks but
 >the convention shots are controlled by Republicans.  So think about it
 >we have what 8.5 different networks (ABC, CBS, C-SPAN, CNN, Comedy Central, 
 >Fox, MTV, NBC & sort of with PBS) covering the convention each has
 >their own cameras for every speaker? No way... 

No, they all don't.  Through the benefits of PIP, I've noticed that PBS
and C-SPAN share a feed, where CNN, ABC, NBC and CBS seem to have their own
cameras there.  While the "four majors" often do use the same feed as PBS and
C-SPAN, they must have their own cameras there as well, as they'll often be
showing a slightly different view of the speaker or crowd than PBS or C-SPAN.
-- 
| William Kucharski, Solbourne Computer, Inc.     | Opinions expressed above
| Internet: kucharsk@solbourne.com   Ham: N0OKQ   | are MINE alone, not those
| Snail Mail: 1900 Pike Road, Longmont, CO  80501 | of Solbourne Computer, Inc.
| President, "Just the Ten of Us" Fan Club        | "Dittos from Longmont, CO"
From: steve@celia.UUCP (Steve Tyree)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Media Bias at Republican Convention
Date: 20 Aug 92 20:03:51 GMT
Reply-To: celia!steve@usc.edu (Steve Tyree)
Organization: Rhythm & Hues, Inc., Hollywood

In article <19780@plains.NoDak.edu> green@plains.NoDak.edu (Brad Green) writes:

>Can any thinking person watch any of the news networks (except C-Span) and
>listen to the bashing and not see the bias?

We shouldnt be to surprised by these people. They may have become addicted to 
the liberal bias, event sensational, pro-big government and mindless coverage
that occurs in the national media outlets. Some PBS fans actually state that 
PBS isnt biased. A network that is partially funded by the government is not
going to have a big government bias. Thats funny.
 Breaking the addiction is what causes normal liberals to start "foaming at the
mouth" and filling usenet with mindless, arrogant counter attacks.
 The more they "foam" the greater the addiction.
 First law of opening the mind.

 ps - Lets remember this and not get to arrogant ourselves.

 Steve Tyree - These opinions are mine and mine alone.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: be124@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Kenneth M. Stasick)
Subject: Re: Balanced Budget Amendment
Reply-To: be124@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Kenneth M. Stasick)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 92 07:56:14 GMT


Responsible representatives???    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
-- 
Roses are red,                                               Kenneth M. Stasick
Violets are blue,                                     Now running at 14,400 bps
I'm schizophrenic,                                  be124@cleveland.freenet.edu
And so am I.                                        kstasick@aixps.baldwinw.edu
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:3647 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:4535 talk.politics.misc:39929 alt.politics.bush:1702 alt.politics.clinton:2011 alt.politics.elections:10643
From: rnlee@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Profess'nal Agitator)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections
Subject: California Senate races  (was Re: the Keating 5)
Date: 15 Aug 92 20:08:15 GMT
Followup-To: alt.rush-limbaugh
Organization: MAWL - Mudd Alums Without Lives

In article <1992Aug14.175738.11639@kpc.com> emmett@kpc.com (Emmett Kilgariff) writes:
>In article <mykes.0ceb@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG> mykes@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG (Mike Schwartz) writes:
>>"Vote for me because I am a woman" is not a compelling reason to vote, IMO.  Given
>>good ideas and programs, I could care less about gender.

>	Unfortunatly, their repbulican male opponents aren't the cream of the
>crop, either. Hershelson (Boxers opponent) is probably the only candidate in 
>the country in favor of more defense spending.  Seymore (Feinstein's opponent) 
>ran in the primaries with a classic commercial, blasting congress as "arrogant"
>- Pretty useless rhetoric, seeing as he's the incumbent senator.

Has Herschensohn actually said he wants *more* defense spending?  As I
understand it, he just wants to keep the levels the same.  He opposes
the radical cuts proposed by the more "dovish" Dems.

Most of Herschensohn's views are compatible with the suburban voters
he's counting on to put him over the top, particularly Orange and San
Diego Counties, as well as the Inland Empire.  This is how he won the
primary, and this is how he hopes to win the general election.  I
consider Herschensohn the second-best candidate of all the Republicans
running (for either seat) in the primary.  Media-unknown Bill Allen
(eek!  another black conservative) was tops.

As for Seymour (why does everybody misspell this name?  not a flame,
just an observation), he was using his absence of name recognition to
his advantage in the primary.  This whole campaign has been portrayed
as "Who is the outsider?"  Because Seymour is not well-known as the
incumbent, he "out-outsided" Dannemeyer, the known congressman.  And
of course, Seymour was treated to all the rewards of incumbency by
state and national party leaders even though he was never elected to
the post.  The GOP would have been better suited to sit out the
primary as they do when the seat is either empty or held by a Dem.

Agitator
  #->

"A political deadend."                  Bruce Herschensohn for U.S. Senate!!!
    --Gore on the Vice Presidency when    Not the ten-year       //  The REAL
      asked about a Dukakis-Gore ticket   Congress insider      //   outsider
--------------- R E M E M B E R   B E I J I N G ------------\\ //------------
IBM PC - Who wants a politically correct computer?           \X/  Only AMIGA!
========================================== Bring Back the Caltech Cannon!! ==
Roderick Lee, HMC '91      "The Professional Agitator"      agitator@ucsd.edu
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: comegys@eci.bbb.cal(Fred Comegys) (Fred Comegys)
Subject: Rush in Amerikkka.
Organization: Enviornmental Concern Institute
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 16:33:44 GMT

The Fascist regime of Amerikkka Capitialists pigs will not stop until they
have established a world company state.  Rush Limbaugh,  who is nothing
more then the arrogant  payed point man for commericalism,  is an evil
symbol of white male domination.

Make no mistake,  Rush is a worshipper of death and destruction.  The fat
big,  all 320 pounds of him--a Georing for our modern age,  delights in the
sounds of animals being butchered.  He referes to Amerikka's most powerful
female as a Navi and a bitch.

Dittoheads,  better called unthinking fascists,  are the enemy--and if they
think that they can engage in such hatred without consequence they will
learn that they are wrong to late.

Blacks, wymmyn, Gays and radicals will defend themselves.
===================================
THE ONLY SOLUTION--A REVOLUTION

Anarchy
From: cam@milton.u.washington.edu (Cameron Ritchie)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
Subject: Looking for xview.h
Summary: trying to port sun4 program to RS6000
Keywords: xview.h/SparcStation/RS6000
Date: 17 Aug 92 22:10:25 GMT
Organization: University of Washington

Hello folks,

I have the source code to an excellent image viewing utility that was
written for and compiled on a Sun Sparc and runs under OpenLook.  I am
trying to compile this same source code on an IBM RS/6000 (R5 I think),
and am having great difficulty.  When the makefile calls for xview.h,
I get the message "inclde not found" etc, etc, etc.

So, given that I know very little about X, could someone clue me in
as to what I need to do to make the code compile (I'm using cc by way)?
My two theories are 1) I have a non-fullfeatured installation of X
on the IBM lacking the widget libraries, or 2) the libraries are called
something else other then xview.h.  Can anyone help?

I have read through the FAQ's for this group and comp.windows.x, but
have yet to find anything that might help.

E-mail any responses to cam@dips.rad.washington.edu.  Many, many
thanks in advance.

Cam Ritchie
From: ashoks@duckjibe.Eng.Sun.COM (Ashok Singhal)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
Subject: Creating xview attribute lists dynamically?
Date: 17 Aug 1992 22:36:56 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: duckjibe

How does one build attribute lists dynamically (i.e. at run time)
so that they can be used to call xv_set(), xv_get(), xv_create() instead
of a static argument list at compile time?

Yes, I have RTFM (XView Programming Manual) but I have not found the answer
there.  From the manual it appears that attr_create_list() function is
called with a an argument list that is fixed at compile time; what I 
want is a list that is determined at run time (actually I want to 
call xv_set(), xv_create() etc from an interpreter with the argument 
attribute list taken from a variable in the interpreter).  The manual
mentions attr_make() but there isn't enough documentation about that
procedure for me to figure out if I can use it.

If someone knows how to do this, I'd appreciate some help.  I can also
write my own procedure to create an attribute list if I knew the format
of the list, so if anyone know that I'd appreciate that information as well.

Thanks,
Ashok
ashok.singhal@Eng.Sun.Com


Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
From: adc@tardis.msu.edu (Alan D. Cabrera)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview,comp.windows.open-look,comp.windows.x
Subject: Color animation with XPM & XView
Date: 21 Aug 92 19:34:57 GMT
Reply-To: adc@tardis.msu.edu
Organization: Michigan State University

I'm trying to make a little color animation in an XView canvas using
Pixmaps created from XPM.  Ideally, I'd like the popup to keep it's
OpenLook control colors.  I didn't think that this would be a problem
since each image has no more than 64 colors and these are mostly blue
and grey.  Still, I can conceive that all of them put together would
make a colormap greater 256; I get an "Xpm Error: Failed to parse or
alloc some color." error from XPM.  So, what utilities are there
whereby I can find out what are all the colors that these frames use,
select the 64 most popular ones to make a new colormap and map the
frames using the new and improved colormap?

I have the RLE tools but am having difficulty figuring out how to use
them.


---
Alan Cabrera				internet:  adc@tardis.cl.msu.edu
Computer Laboratory			phone:     (517) 353-3027
Michigan State University		fax:       (517) 353-9847
514 Computer Center			bitnet:    CABRERA@MSU
East Lansing, MI 48824
From: adc@tardis.msu.edu (Alan D. Cabrera)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
Subject: Re: Notify_client numbers
Date: 20 Aug 92 15:22:22 GMT
Reply-To: adc@tardis.msu.edu
Organization: Michigan State University

In article 5508@ssc-bee.ssc-vax.boeing.com, mattb@ssc-vax (Matt Baney) writes:
>
> Along this same line?  Are there any restrictions on what keys can
> be used for XV_KEY_DATA values when attaching information to an 
> object??
> 
> I had a problem using the same XV_KEY_DATA key to attach some data
> to a frame and two child panels of the frame??
> 
>   xv_set(frame, XV_KEY_DATA, 4, some_number, ... NULL);
>   xv_set(panel1, XV_KEY_DATA, 4, some_number, ..  NULL);
>   xv_set(panel2, XV_KEY_DATA, 4, some_number, ... NULL);
> 
>   This would bomb whenever anything was done that caused a
>   re-painting re-sizing of the frame??
> 
>   I solved the problem by using different keys:
> 
>   xv_set(frame, XV_KEY_DATA, 4, some_number, ... NULL);
>   xv_set(panel1, XV_KEY_DATA, 13, some_number, ..  NULL);
>   xv_set(panel2, XV_KEY_DATA, 13, some_number, ... NULL);
> 
> DOes anyone know if there are any restrictions or key numbers you
> shouldn't be using??

The integers that you use should be unique.  The best way to get a
unique integer is to use the xv_unique_key() routine.  Using your
example:

	int frameKey, panel1Key, panel2Key;
	
	frameKEY = xv_unique_key();
	panel1KEY = xv_unique_key();
	panel2KEY = xv_unique_key();
	
	xv_set(frame, XV_KEY_DATA, frameKEY, some_number, ... NULL);
	xv_set(panel1, XV_KEY_DATA, panel1KEY, some_number, ..  NULL);
	xv_set(panel2, XV_KEY_DATA, panel2KEY, some_number, ... NULL);


> Also what is the best way to get answers about this XVIEW stuff??  I
> have not gotten much help at all from the peole at SUN, and the
> answers I have gotten were usually either wrong, or the answer was
> that I shouldn't be doing that anyway??

I'd get a copy of the XView Programming Manual.  In it, it clearly
states that "Using XV_KEY_DATA requires a key, which must be some
arbitrary, but unique, integer."



---
Alan Cabrera				internet:  adc@tardis.cl.msu.edu
Computer Laboratory			phone:     (517) 353-3027
Michigan State University		fax:       (517) 353-9847
514 Computer Center			bitnet:    CABRERA@MSU
East Lansing, MI 48824
From: billh@mugwump.UK.Sun.COM (Bill Hodgson - Sun EHQ - Cascade)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
Subject: Keyboard Focus
Date: 20 Aug 92 10:16:54 GMT
Reply-To: billh@mugwump.UK.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: mugwump.uk.sun.com

Roar Smith suggested that using
the function 'win_set_kbd_focus' to change the keyboard focus might
work. I also attempted to use this function myself, the only problem
being that the linker couldn't find it.

Here is some information about the OW3 libraries on our system:

mugwump Bill>> nm libxview.a | grep win_set_kbd_focus
         U _win_set_kbd_focus
         U _win_set_kbd_focus
         U _win_set_kbd_focus
         U _win_set_kbd_focus
         U _win_set_kbd_focus
         U _win_set_kbd_focus
         U _win_set_kbd_focus
00000c28 T _win_set_kbd_focus
         U _win_set_kbd_focus
mugwump Bill>> nm libxview.sa.3.1 | grep win_set_kbd_focus
mugwump Bill>> nm libxview.so.3.1 | grep win_set_kbd_focus
000446c8 T _win_set_kbd_focus
000446c8 t win_input+win_set_kbd_focus.o

Which appears to suggest the function exists in both libxview.a and
libxview.so.3.1

Can either of you tell me why I can't link it? We're not using any special
linker flags, so I assume we're 'static' linking, but which library therefore are
we using?

Bill.
---
Bill Hodgson, Sun Microsystems, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, Surrey, GU15 3YL, UK
Contactable On: +44-276-416635 (Work, Office Hours)
Xref: sparky alt.toolkits.xview:782 comp.windows.open-look:3516