HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bwatson@nyx.cs.du.edu (bruce watson)
Subject: Re: The Simpsons answer Bush!
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 16:18:21 GMT

In article <100@bbx.basis.com> scott@bbx.basis.com (Scott Amspoker) writes:
>In article <mwalker-240892135029@mwalker1.npd.provo.novell.com.> mwalker@novell.com (Mel Walker) writes:
>>It seems to me that the earlier reply was "We're a lot like the Waltons.
>>We're praying for the _RECESSION_ to end." Now I noticed that it appears to
>>have been changed to DEPRESSION. Did I just imagine that the earlier post
>>was different? Does anyone else remember it this way? Can someone with a
>>VCR confirm this?
>
>They said "depression" the first time too.
>
>-- 
>Scott Amspoker                       |    
>Basis International, Albuquerque, NM |  Too bad ignorance isn't really
>                                     |  bliss.  Then it could be outlawed.
>scott@bbx.basis.com                  |

I heard "depression" both times.


--
 ___________________________________________________________________________ 
|wats@nyx.cs.du.edu |   "To the extent that it doesn't use mathematics;     |
|   Bruce Watson    |                 it is no science."                    |
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: craig@cognet.ucla.edu (Craig Morioka)
Subject: The Price is Right?
Originator: craig@regulus.cognet.ucla.edu
Organization: UCLA Cognitive Science Research Program
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 17:41:27 GMT

Did anyone catch the price of Maggie going through the 
checkout counter last night (Aug 27)?


             /\
       .----/  \----.
        \          /
      .--\ (o)(o) /__.
       \     ()     /
        >   (C_)   <
       /___\____/___\
          /|    |\
         /        \

	__________
        $   ???.?? 	
	----------


Craig Morioka
craig@cognet.ucla.edu
From: parilis@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Gary Parilis)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: '...less like the Simpsons?!'  (George Bush speaks)
Date: 2 Sep 92 19:13:46 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <1992Aug20.184204.13737@morrow.stanford.edu> AH.PBL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Mark) writes:

>   I'm waiting for The Simpsons to strike back at Bush and his cronies
>   with their "Family Values" rhetoric.  A new chalkboard opening, perhaps.

Something like:

"I will be more like John-Boy"  ;-)

- Gary
From: eapg071@orion.oac.uci.edu (Richard Weiss)
Subject: Re: [8F23] Brother Can You Spare A Dime?
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 1 Sep 92 19:09:12 GMT

In article <Btwwn9.Dv@news.cso.uiuc.edu> sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter) writes:
>og@access.digex.com (Gary Goldberg) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Aug28.071431.24791@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> schwim@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Rosebud) writes:
>>>DYN:
>>>Back in 1985, the Simpsons actually had a nice light show for xmas?
>>>	(well, it was probably put up in '86...)
>
>>Since Homer didn't know what the switch did, it is likely that they were put
>>there by the previous occupants of the house? Although the timing may not work out. - Gary
>
>Not likely.  As Homer's couch flashbacks from that very episode demonstrate,
>OFF has been living in that house since about 1980.
>
>
to me this seemed to have a very simple explanation without any need for
continuity analysis:

Homer put up the lights around Xmas 1985. They probably never worked (though
not necessarily) until this exact moment when Homer threw the correct switch
for the first time.

while for most people the idea of not taking down xmas lights for 6-7 years
and never trying an obvious light switch in the middle of the hallway might
be considered out of the ordinary, I feel this fits Homer's character well.

how 'bout the rest of you?


Rick Weiss--University of California, Irvine

*********************************************
                      ) """ (
                       (Q Q)
   Don't spook        (  |  )
    the horse!         \ A /
                       (___)
*********************************************
Organization: Bar-Ilan University Computing Center, Israel
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 18:29:08 IST
From: Shlomo <X42529@BARILVM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: TV channel with Simpsons in Germany

In article <t9613aa.714920331@sun1>, t9613aa@sun1.LRZ-Muenchen.DE (Karl Wild)
says:
>Hello folks,
>back in Germany I am missing the Simpsons. Does somebody know whether there
>is a TV channel which I can receive in Germany and is broadcasting the
>Simpsons?

Sky Channel (u.k.) broadcasts it once a week, I'm pretty sure you get Sky
  in Germany.

Although I did forget what day of the week it's on.....
  Check the listings.... (if you still can't find out what day and what
  time it's on, tell me (by e-mail) and I'll check for you.)
hey......I think it's on Sunday evening but I'm not sure.....well,see if you
  can find out for sure.
--Shlomo
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: ewm6965@venus.tamu.edu (The Guardian)
Subject: Re: article in the local tv guide
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 04:54:00 GMT

In article <1992Aug17.152847.15745@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, kwright@nyx.cs.du.edu
(Ken Wright) writes...
>Who are Ren and Stimpy?? I've never heard of them.

Ren & Stimpy are two cartoon characters on Nickelodeon--Sundays at 10:30 am and 
some time Saturday nights.  Ren is a chihuahua, Stimpy a big cat.  They're real 
funny.  One interesting touch is the various classical music that's always in 
the background.

Sample quote:  (they have something like this at the end of each show)

Ren:  Well, that's it for today, folks.  See you next time.
Stimpy:  What happens to us?
Ren:  The show's over.  Goodbye, everyone.
Stimpy [getting nervous]:  But what'll we do till then?
Ren:  Well, you could...clean your belly button...eat olive loaf till you puke!
Stimpy:  Aaigh!
Ren:  I've got it!  You could...chase your tail till you get dizzy!
Stimpy:  But I don't have a tail, Ren.
Ren:  Do what I tell you, stupid!  [Ren chases own rear end, spins into a blur, 
falls on head] How do you feel?
Stimpy:  Kind of sick.  [burps]
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: glitto@iastate.edu (Scott M Klabacha)
Subject: Re: The Price is Right?
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 19:21:12 GMT

craig@cognet.ucla.edu (Craig Morioka) writes:
>Did anyone catch the price of Maggie going through the 
>checkout counter last night (Aug 27)?
>
>
>             /\
>       .----/  \----.
>        \          /
>      .--\ (o)(o) /__.
>       \     ()     /
>        >   (C_)   <
>       /___\____/___\
>          /|    |\
>         /        \
>
>	__________
>        $   ???.?? 	
>	----------
>

I put it on freeze frame and frame-by-frame'd it, but it was still too
blurry to read (it looked like $547.??). Does the price remain the same
every time, or does it change? Are the only two things which change the
blackboard and couch arrangement?

One thing I did discover while slo-mo'ing the title sequence was
that I noticed Monty Burns in the background when the 5:00 bell rings, 
looking in confusion at his watch and then shaking his arm like his watch
is broken or something.

I was really hoping, when Herb unveiled the Baby Translator, that Homer
would make some noise or say something that caused the machine to translate
him. Oh well.

An uneven episode...many entertaining things, but a lot of stupid stuff, too.

***gLITTOfERN*** glitto@iastate.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: cal@ee.ryerson.ca (Calvin Henry-Cotnam)
Subject: Re: 8/27 Episode (US) (8f23?)
Organization: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute, Toronto
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 01:40:58 GMT

In article <schnitzi.715017472@eola.cs.ucf.edu> schnitzi@cs.ucf.edu (Mark Schnitzius) writes:
>I liked the racing washer and dryer.
>
>But I do agree that the episode lacked flow.  It seemed kind of

I too liked the race.  In fact, I was completely caught off guard
by the flash to the scene showing where Herb got the $50 for the
washer and dryer that I nearly died laughing.

Just one of those things.  In thinking back, it was no funnier than
the rest of the show, but at the time, the cut away to that scene
just had me rolling over in laughter.


Calvin Henry-Cotnam, CATE            |    MY CANADA INCLUDES CANADIANS!
Ryerson Polytechnical Institute      | I would really like this to include
Toronto, Ontario, Canada             | Quebec - but I won't hold my breath.
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: pi@wam.umd.edu (Raymond L. Gilbert)
Subject: Re: Patent Number theory
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 03:09:53 GMT

In article <ELM.92Aug28184012@terrorism.berkeley.edu>, elm@cs.berkeley.edu (ethan miller) writes:
> In article <29AUG92.02280679@umbc1.umbc.edu> noel@umbc1.umbc.edu writes:
> =>The only thing I can think of is that somone who works on "The
> =>Simpsons" (Sam Simon I beleive) came from a Maryland suburb of
> =>Washington DC.  Can anyone born in the DC/metro area confirm that
> =>people born in Silver Spring or thereabouts have SSN's that begin
> =>with 214?
> Yep.  I wasn't born in Montgomery County, MD (suburbs north of DC),
> but I did get my SSN while my parents were living there.  My SSN does
> indeed begin with 214.  The area might also include DC itself.
I'm not sure that the numbering system goes strictly by area.  For
example, I was born in Silver Spring and my first 3 SSN digits are 579.
Furthermore, I know of others born in the *same* hospital at about the
same time that have different SSNs.  I'm not denying that geography
has something to do with it; I'm just saying that it might not be as
straightforward as you all imply.
-- 
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Raymond L. Gilbert       | "I *hate* Vulcans! I *hate* the logic. I *hate* |
| Internet: pi@wam.umd.edu |  the arrogance."                                |
|           pi@lpr.umd.edu |        - Sela on Spock, ST:TNG, Unification II  |
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: schwim@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Rosebud)
Subject: [8F23] BCYSAD?, and Sidenote on Walton's/Bush Scene
Organization: The Land of Chocolate
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 19:17:29 GMT


Again, maybe because there hasn't been one for a while, but I liked it.
Half of it did fall flat, though.  But how can't you love an episode with
Maggie?  (And she did not "speak" yet. :)  Actually, it would have been
kinda neat if my typo was right, and they had three-headed (not eyed) sperm.

Something which surprised me was the (seeming -- maybe I missed them) lack
of DYNs in several scenes.  I would have thought the examination rooms would
have had some random drawings, but it appeared pretty plain.  Was the house
picture in the Simpson's house new?

Anyways, for those Simpsons fans with a color macintosh, it was noted in
comp.sys.mac.digest that the scene with bush and bart is available via
anonymous ftp at ftp.apple.com in /pub/pugh/quicktime/not-the-waltons.bin

It's a 1.1 mb quicktime movie in macbinary format.

				Larry
{las}

Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: eam@gato.mis.semi.harris.com (Technology Centre)
Subject: Last Nites' (show)?
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 11:48:11 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Melbourne FL

If we disregard the poor voice & sound sync/quality, the trite story line, 
the poor graphics, and the general lack of comedy, this was one of the best
episodes ever.  

Even taking all that into account, it was by far the best episode this year!

Ed
From: ST702459@brownvm.brown.edu (Jordan Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Lights on roof mistake
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 17:42:00 EDT
Organization: Brown University - Providence, Rhode Island  USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: brownvm.brown.edu
News-Software: BNN via BNN_POST v1.0 beta

Minor inconsistency: The lights on the top of the house ("Uh, I don't know
what this switch does") read "Merry Christmas and Happy 1985".  However,
in a previous episode (Burns runs for governor) the lights on the roof
read "Burns for Governor" or "Vote Burns" or somesuch nonsense. Meaning,
either the Burns people left the lights up there, Burns ran for governor
before December 1985, or, more likely, they are not as astute as yours
truly.

Good show otherwise, although I couldn't help picturing little fat Danny
DeVito whenever Herb talked...

J
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
Subject: 8/27 Episode (US) (8f23?)
Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 00:46:04 GMT

Just wanted to be the first to point out the movie reference to
2001: A Space Odyssey.

I have to say that I didn't enjoy this episode as much as the others
from this season.  Not enough of the little subtleties that make a
Simpsons episode great, too hard to suspend disbelief for a couple of
the things (the settlement, which would've been thrown out of court
were it really an issue, the whole concept of Herb's invention).  Plus,
unusually, a lot of the jokes just fell flat.  Too much resorting to
easy toilet jokes.  Homer was somewhat out of character.

Stuff I did like:

* Lisa's subscription to New Republic for Kids

* The great books of the Western World -- from Beowulf to Less than Zero (!)

* The baby-plane, even though the joke was telegraphed a mile away, it
  still came off nicely. 
-- 
             ......................................................
             ted frank | thf2@midway.uchicago.edu | std disclaimers
             the university of chicago law skool, chicago, illinois
             it's log!  log!  log!  it's big, it's heavy, it's wood
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: bw462@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bucky Whaley)
Subject: Re: 8f23 Brother, can you spare two di?es?
Reply-To: bw462@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bucky Whaley)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 16:41:32 GMT


In a previous article, rsteele@adam.ll.mit.edu (Rob Steele) says:

>I liked the bit about The Great Books of Western Civilization.  There  
>really is a canon of literature and at least one publisher will sell  
>you a subscription to the "top 100".  The joke is that none of the  
>books in the show's great books series is actually in the canon.
>
>I'm not literate enough to know what the common theme is in the books  
>Lisa mentions but I would guess they're politically correct.  As far as  
>I know, there is no shared theme in the official great books apart from  
>their having been written by the dreaded Dead White Males.

The books are:

_Paradise Regained_ (John Milton)
_Martin Chuzzlewit_ (Charles Dickens)
_Omoo_ and _Typee_ (Herman Melville)

Sorry to disappoint (NOT), but there's no "politically correct" thematic
connection.  They're just all second-tier works by DWMs (tm).  The series
should be called "Not-So-Great Books of Western Civilization."  

(A list of genuinely great books by the same authors would run:
_Paradise Lost_, _Bleak House_, and _Moby Dick_.)

I've no idea if the irony is intentional, but--judging by the books
Lisa lists, at least--there's no reason to believe anyone other than 
DWMs is deemed worthy of inclusion on even the Great Books second-
string team.  Fortunately Unky Herb is a little more discerning:
Edith Wharton is a first-rank writer, even if _Ethan Frome is not her
best.

-Bucky, who likes reading wonderful stories, and thanks the 
        politically correct people for all the shit they've 
        taken getting more wonderful works into the curriculum...

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Bucky Whaley                   |  You made me bleed my own blood!   
 bw462@cleveland.freenet.edu    |     - Nelson, "Bart the General"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: thove@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (hove tom)
Subject: Shearer and Brokaw
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 20:11:36 GMT

Did anyone else think that on last night's episode (8/27) Harry Shearer
was imitating Tom Brokaw on that clip Homer was watching of the Berlin
Wall coming down?  Once on Letterman, Shearer had commented that Brokaw
didn't deserve to be an anchorman because he couldn't pronounce L's or
R's at all.  (I suppose the same could be said for Peter Jennings, who,
as John Updike (what a namedropper I am) pointed out, still pronounces
"about" as "aboot," sort of like the nun's at the Saint Sebastian School
for Wicked Girls.)  The number of voices Harry Shearer can imitate just
boggles the mind, don't it?

Tom Hove

Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: dhyatt@leland.Stanford.EDU (David Hyatt)
Subject: Brother, can you spare two dimes -- mixed thoughts
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 03:49:20 GMT


On the one hand, I didn't like the episode because I found most
of the dialogue, especially in the first half, to be somehow "off."
Burns' anti-lawyer rant was WAY "off".  The first Herb scenes were
way "off".  Just altogether wrong rhythms.  And that was just the
writing.  Burns' voice was also way "off" in that rant.

On the other hand, I loved it for a lot of small scenes -- the 2001:
A S.O. reference, the Flanders' scene, the Raffi joke, the stupid
award ceremony (with the obligatory "Websters defines..." introduction).

On the other hand, I didn't like it because it was a lot of good
little scenes pressed together.  And the ends of the "Acts" were
very unnatural -- the "Homer falls off the balcony" ending was just
like the "Homer almost chokes on the hamburger" ending of last
season -- inconclusive, and distracting.

On the other hand, I LOVED it because.... because the "Script Editors"
were two fellows named Josh Weinstein (Stanford '88) and Bill Oakley
(Harvard '88), bright young tv comedy writing guys, one of whom I know
relatively well (Josh).  They previously wrote for "Best of the
Worst" and "Crash" (a cable comedy game show), among other things.
They helped put together many of the Harvard Lampoon summer projects
of the late eighties (MediaGate, fake USAToday, etc...).  So, that
probably explains why this show had a somewhat different rhythm --
this was the first episode they wrote.  Congratulations to Josh
and Bill.  If anyone wants to ask them specific questions about this
episode, I'll be happy to forward any _intelligent_ questions along.
No guarantees.

To the previous poster: leave some DYNs for the rest of us!  Jeez!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
|  david hyatt                  "MMMMMMMmmmmmmm.....  lutefisk"      |
|  dhyatt@leland.stanford.edu    415-FAR-TING    - Homer, someday... |
|  better bet: dhyatt@infinity.com  415-940-6144 (work)              |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: flaps@dgp.toronto.edu (Alan J Rosenthal)
Subject: Re: 8f23 Brother, can you spare two di?es?
Distribution: alt
Date: 29 Aug 92 20:25:20 GMT

eck@panix.com (Mark Eckenwiler) writes:
>Note that Homer sez "butt-ox", not "buttucks" like a normal person.

Perhaps people who do this are people who have only seen it in print but don't
frequently know words only from seeing them in print (unlike us more literate
folks).
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: stevev@miser.uoregon.edu (Steve VanDevender)
Subject: Re: lines from last year?
Organization: University of Oregon Chemistry Stores
Date: 28 Aug 92 10:41:38

In article <17hp2lINN75b@cs.widener.edu> Roger.Wennstrom@lu.erisoft.SE writes:

   Lisa:  Perhaps there is no moral to this story.
   Homer: Exactly!  Just a bunch of stuff that happened.
   Marge: But it certainly was a memorable few days.
   Homer: Amen to that!
	  [laughter all around]

   -- We don't need no steenkin' morals, ``Blood Feud''

Or, to make an atrocious pun:

-- Adages?  We don't need no steenkin adages!, "Blood Feud"
--
Steve VanDevender 	stevev@greylady.uoregon.edu
"Bipedalism--an unrecognized disease affecting over 99% of the population.
Symptoms include lack of traffic sense, slow rate of travel, and the
classic, easily recognized behavior known as walking."
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: courtney@sequent.com (Courtney Powell)
Subject: Re: I said, "things couldn't get any worse."
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc.
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 20:14:30 GMT

	My theory is that the writers were trying to "Psych Out" the audience.
Anyone who has watched at least a moderate amount of the Simpsons begins to 
get used to the timing: therefore, I think most people expected "Homer Simpson,
please report to Mr. Burns's office" or something similar (some tragedy) to
occur right after "Things can't get any worse". Infact, it worked: my cousin,
a classic case of "Oh, watch, he's going to do this, and that, and then this
is going to happen" said "Watch, he'll get called to Mr Burns office.." when
we all expected it to happen. After awhile, he said "Maybe not.." followed 
promptly by a "Simpson, please report to Mr. Burns's office." That made it all
the more funnier for me. What a poorly formatted paragraph.
 
	Myself, I think this "show anaylazation" is going a bit to far. I don't
know how someone can get so caught up in the details of a show, etc. I only
wonder if these people enjoy the shows--

	(I think the clincher was analyzing wheater or not washer and dryers 
would move by themselves on floors or not. Urgh. Just laugh, ok?)

	BTW- How come I've seen no messages in regard to David Mirsky's posting
of all the new episodes? I thought a cascade of discussion would follow.
Myself, I'm pumped for "Itchy And Scratchy: The Movie". Any guesses?

Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman)
Subject: Re: Emmys
Organization: The Admiral's Unix System & The Grid BBS
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1992 04:56:00 GMT

In article <1992Aug30.183622.4967@Princeton.EDU> rjc@onion.princeton.edu (Raymond Chen) writes:
>And, in a move that defies explanation, the award for Animated Program
>didn't go to OFF, nor to Ren and Stimpy.  It went to...
>
>	A Claymation Easter

Oh, I don't know about defying explanation. R&S and OFF probably split the vote,
and Claymation Easter snuck in from a strong third.


-- 
"Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ray, when somebody asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" -- Winston Zeddmore
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: True Facts about Weinstein. And more!
From: mirsky1@husc8.harvard.edu (David Mirsky)
Date: 28 Aug 92 21:09:41 EDT
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

I sent some posts from the past few days to Bill Oakley and 
Josh Weinstein. They wanted me to clear up a few misconceptions.

1. Josh is not the same Josh Weinstein who wrote for Mystery
   Science Theater 3000. (I assume he is telling the truth)
 
2. Bill Oakley and Josh Weinstein did not write last weeks episode.
   It was just the first week in which their names appeared on the
   credits. (You can confirm this by scanning the credits of all the
   previous episodes and then comparing them with last week's credits).
From: rjc@onion.princeton.edu (Raymond Chen)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: Yeardley /= Weirdly?
Date: 23 Aug 92 22:33:01 GMT
Organization: Abject Admirers of Lisa Simpson

In article <1992Aug20.140240.16658@gvl.unisys.com> schrey@prc.unisys.com writes:
>In article <1992Aug19.160138.5893@Princeton.EDU>, rjc@onion.princeton.edu (Raymond Chen) writes:
>|> Yeardley ``No it doesn't rhyme with `weirdly' '' Smith is 27 years old...
>   How is it pronounced?

"Yeardley" is a variant spelling of the name "Yardley", whose pronunciation
is nonproblematical.

BTW:  Even though YS has a significant role in "Maximum Overdrive", I
implore you not to see it.  Even though there's a scene where you can
look up her skirt.  Just don't watch it.  Please.
--
Raymond ``I'm teaching your daughter riding, grooming, and at no
	  extra charge, pronunciation.''[8f06] Chen