HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: oler@rho.uleth.ca (Cary Oler)
Subject: Daily Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for 14 September
Organization: University of Lethbridge
Date: 15 Sep 92 07:26:56 GMT

!!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 258, 09/14/92
10.7 FLUX=121.7  90-AVG=124        SSN=086      BKI=1322 2222  BAI=007
BGND-XRAY=B3.5     FLU1=8.3E+05  FLU10=1.4E+04  PKI=2323 2232  PAI=009
  BOU-DEV=009,027,014,013,010,017,011,010   DEV-AVG=013 NT     SWF=00:000
 XRAY-MAX= C2.8   @ 1648UT    XRAY-MIN= B3.2   @ 2255UT   XRAY-AVG= B5.7
NEUTN-MAX= +003%  @ 2015UT   NEUTN-MIN= -001%  @ 2135UT  NEUTN-AVG= +0.5%
  PCA-MAX= +0.2DB @ 1130UT     PCA-MIN= +0.0DB @ 2355UT    PCA-AVG= +0.1DB
BOUTF-MAX=55444NT @ 1232UT   BOUTF-MIN=55405NT @ 1931UT  BOUTF-AVG=55429NT
GOES7-MAX=P:+141NT@ 2021UT   GOES7-MIN=N:-014NT@ 0956UT  G7-AVG=+086,+041,+011
GOES6-MAX=P:+149NT@ 2022UT   GOES6-MIN=E:-009NT@ 1639UT  G6-AVG=+096,+001,+032
 FLUXFCST=STD:118,112,107;SESC:115,110,105 BAI/PAI-FCST=005,010,010/010,010,010
    KFCST=1233 4111 1234 4221  27DAY-AP=006,006   27DAY-KP=2112 2222 1121 2223
 WARNINGS=
   ALERTS=
!!END-DATA!!
Newsgroups: sci.astro,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave
From: oler@rho.uleth.ca (Cary Oler)
Subject: WARNING: Potential Major Solar Flare Warning
Organization: University of Lethbridge
Date:  6 Sep 92 19:05:06 GMT

                   /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

                     POTENTIAL MAJOR SOLAR FLARE WARNING

                       UPDATED: 18:30 UT, 06 SEPTEMBER

                   /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\


PRIMARY CANDIDATE FOR HIGH SOLAR ACTIVITY : REGION 7270 (S09W28@06/00Z)

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   ESTIMATED POTENTIAL MAGNITUDE OF ENERGETIC ACTIVITY OVER NEXT 7 DAYS   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| DAYS |   C5.0   |   M1.0   |   M5.0   |   X1.0   |   X5.0   |   >X12.0   |
|------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|------------|
|1(+)PG|   99 %   |   70 %   |   50 %   |   25 %   |   10 %   |     1 %    |
|3(+)PG|   99 %   |   70 %   |   60 %   |   35 %   |   15 %   |     2 %    |
|5( )P |   99 %   |   75 %   |   70 %   |   40 %   |   15 %   |     2 %    |
|7( )  |   WLT    |   WLT    |   WLT    |   WLT    |   WLT    |    WLT     |
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

DAYS = Number of days (from present) into the future (1, 3, 5 and 7 days).
(+)  = Primary candidate region expected to GROW and DEVELOP.
( )  = Primary candidate region expected to STABILIZE or remain STABLE.
(-)  = Primary candidate region expected to DECAY and SIMPLIFY.
(x)P = Possible proton and/or PCA threat. (x) may be one of (+), (-), or ( ).
(x)G = If a favorable major flare develops, a moderate to high probability
       exists that the event may be geoeffective.
xx % = Probability of activity equalling or exceeding the given x-ray class
       sometime over the next number of DAYS.
WLT  = Data not applicable due to the West Limb Transit of the target region.

The above chart should be used as a guide only.  It represents anticipated
levels of activity based on current projections of region development.
Actual conditions may, of course, differ from these projections.


SYNOPSIS:

     Major flare activity is possible from Region 7270.  This region has
shown grown and a considerable level of instability and M-class flare
activity.  It is becoming magnetically complex with a developing delta
configuration.

     There is a chance major flare activity could inject protons into the
near-Earth space environment.

     This warning will remain active until further notice.


                   /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: msimpson@kean.ucs.mun.ca
Subject: SP-102F - My opinion/impression
Organization: Memorial University. St.John's Nfld, Canada
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 16:41:07 GMT

     I've had the oppotunity lately to try out a friends Celestron
SP-102 Flourite refractor and thought I'd toss out my 
opinions/impressions.  This may contribute to ongoing discussions on 
the net, one on optics, the other on the SP mount.
    After spending an evening with the scope I came away disappointed. 
 After hearing *so much* after the performance of apo-refractors I was 
ready to have my socks blown off.  The scope was nice, but not mind 
bending - in the words of Public Enemy "don't believe the hype".
     The most disappointing thing was the lack of aperture.  The 
Messier objects thru the 4" refractor were little more than fuzzy 
blobs.  My Meade 8" SCT with good optics (the topic of much discussion 
on the net about 9 months ago - I sent my old one back with bad optics 
and they sent me a new one with good optics)'
easlity trounced the refractor.  Planetary images, during an evening 
of average seeing, looked comparable to me.  Double stars were *much* 
better in the refractor.  We easlity split Epsilon Bootes with the 
refractor.  Nothing of the companion was seen in the SCT.
     I was generally impressed with the SP mount after hearing much 
bad about it.  It was fine for visual observing.  My frieNd wisely 
bought "shake-enders" with it - I was investment in my opinion.

   In summary:

What I liked about the scope:

1.  Nice dark background!
2.  Really sharp images to the edge of the field!  Before he had the 
motors installed we'd let planets drift across the entire field. It was
quite a change for me to see a planet in focus at the edge of the 
eyepiece.

What I didn't like:

1. Not enough aperture!
2. Difficult to use the slo-mo controls when looking thru the 
eyepiece.
3. What's with this portability thing?  This scope was not what I 
would call Easily portable - a SCT is more portable (IMHO).
4. Expensive!
5. T%his is in fact the second scope - the first one was sent back 
because the optics were not up to par, and this one is going back too.
The star test reveals a textbook image on one side of focus and slop 
on the other.  Celestron has not been quick with the replacement scope 
either.

If I knew now what I know (huh?) when I was first buying a scope I'd 
buy neither a refractor nor a SCT (but I'd choose the SCT over the 
refractor, hands down) I'd buy/build a Dobsonian.

This has been my two cents worth.

Malcolm Simpson
St. John's. Newfoundland
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: peters@mcnc.org (Charles Ross Peters)
Subject: Yet another beginner telescope question
Organization: MCNC Center for Microelectronics, RTP, NC
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 21:54:29 GMT


Since a couple of people have asked about beginners scopes,
I would like to know peoples opinions and experiences
with the Edmund Astroscan 2001 (4 1/8 inch f 4.3 sealed reflector 
with ball and stand type mount).  At about $300 with 28mm
eyepiece, is this a good value?  Have the optics of these
scopes generally been decent?  The fact that the optics are
"permanently" fixed in their mounts bothers me a bit, but
I quess for $300 you have to make compromises.


Charles Peters
peters@mcnc.org
From: lpb@florida.swdc.stratus.com (Len Bucuvalas)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: Space Poop Message Deleted?
Date: 9 Sep 92 00:16:25 GMT
Distribution: usa

In article <1861fdINNoov@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bj368@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mike E. Romano) writes:
>
>On Wednesday Sept 2 1992 I posted a message entitled: Space Poop
>about debris orbiting earth.
>That was about 7 pm California time...about an hour later a 
>Mr. Steuven replied to my posting with a "what's your point"
>sort of response, etc.
>AMAZING....
>Now the next day I find my original positing was entirely
>missing from the newsgroup as well as Mr. Steuven's.
>Who does this: and isn't this supposed to be an un moderated
>newsgroup?

Interesting.... I thought that only the Moderator or the
Original Poster could do that! hmmm......Can you say
POLITICS??? Shuuure you can! ;^)

>Anyway here we go again:
>
>Since 1957 more than 3,300 launches have produced 7,000 
>trackable objects currently in orbit, equalling approx 3000
>tons of man made material.  Of these 7000 catalogued objects
>only 400 are operational satellites.  
>and fragments including lens covers, separations bolts and
>clamp bands.
>Further, there are from 30,000 to 70,000 smaller objects
>but larger than 1 cm which have not been catalogued. Any
>pieces in this size range can damage spacecraft.
>
>Through the effect of air drag these objects continue to
>lose altitude and eventually rain down to earth.
>Objects above the altitude of 1000 km are in the geo
>stationery orbit and will remain there for 1000 years
>orbitting the planet some 5 million times and posing
>a constant hazard of collision with other objects.
>Most of these objects have a velocity of at least 3 km/sec
>Interactive collisions in earth orbits will eventually
>generate sufficient debris to create a dense Debris Belt
>and prevent further launchings.
>see for example  July 1992  Acta Astronautica, etc.
>-- 
>            Mike Romano     Univ. Calif. Berkeley

I saw something about this on this group and my question would
concern orbital decay. When where and how much of it.

Len
--
*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
The accountability of government has gone to the point where the very
use of the law is the instrument of illegality.
		-- Ralph Nader @ Harvard Law School, 1/15/92
Newsgroups: sci.astro,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave
From: oler@rho.uleth.ca (Cary Oler)
Subject: ALERT: Major Geomagnetic Storm Alert - 09 Sept.
Organization: University of Lethbridge
Date:  9 Sep 92 17:22:16 GMT

                    /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

                        MAJOR GEOMAGNETIC STORM ALERT

                        ISSUED: 16:45 UT, 09 SEPTEMBER

                    /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\


ATTENTION:

     Geomagnetic activity surpassed the major storm threshold at 15:00 UT.
Major to severe storming has occurred following the sudden magnetic impulse
at 01:39 UT.

     HF propagation conditions have become strongly degraded, particularly
over the high and polar latitude signal paths where radio blackout conditions
have occasionally been observed.  Similar conditions are expected to continue
for the next 18 to 24 hours.  Fair to occasionally very poor propagation is
expected over the middle latitude signal paths.  High and polar latitudes
will observe very poor to near radio blackout conditions, while low latitude
paths should see mostly good to occasionally fair propagation.  Night-sector
propagation will be the most unstable.

     Moderate to high levels of auroral activity materialized during the
local night sector over North America following the arrival of the
interplanetary disturbance at 01:39 UT.  The phase of the moon inhibited
attempts to view activity and will continue to drown out activity.  However,
auroral activity was intense enough to be observed over many middle latitude
regions.  Conditions are expected to remain favorable for observing activity
over the northerly middle and high latitude regions during the local evening
and early morning hours of 09/10 September.


**  End of Alert  **
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: thumper@engin.umich.edu (Bob Topping)
Subject: Re: bolide sighting
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 01:00:50 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Keywords: meteor

In article <1992Sep14.013712.1611@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> lew@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (lewis.h.mammel..jr) writes:
>At 8:04 PM CDT I saw a bright orange-yellow bolide from
>Wheaton, IL. It was just about due east near the horizon,
>south of the rising moon. It appeared to be moving towards
>the northeast. I actually saw it through a window from inside
>my house. I could be mistaken, but I've seen bolides before
>and this looked like one, for sure.
>
>Anybody else see it ?
>
>Lew Mammel, Jr.

  I can back this up.  I saw it at 9:05pm EST (according to my watch).  It
was in the northern half of the sky, about 75 degrees from the moon.  At its
peak, it was brighter than the moon.

  Unfortunately, I only saw the actual bolide as it broke up, not the fire-
ball.

  Seen from Ann Arbor, Michigan.

           Bob Topping.

 
-- 
@ "Our lives are better left to chance; +       PLEASE E-Mail to:           @
@  I could have missed the pain, but    +  bob.topping@um.cc.umich.edu      @
@  I'd have had to miss the dance."     +  phy_astrclub@emunix.emich.edu    @
@       -- Garth Brooks, The Dance.     +     ** RETURN OUR HURON! **       @
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: j.jahn@abbs.hanse.de (Jost Jahn)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Sunspots at 10.09.1992.
Reply-To: j.jahn@abbs.hanse.de
Date: 10 Sep 92 20:20:00 MESZ
Distribution: sci
Organization: ABBS AstroMail, D-W 2121 Dahlenburg / Germany
X-Version: ZerUU V6.45c

Sunspots at 10.09.1992., 0 h UT.

No.    Pos.  Cl.  Ar.  Mag. SF  F  M  X
---------------------------------------
7270 10S 83W Dao  140   b    2     1
7276 16N 53E Dai  240   bg   2
7277 11S 18E Cro   20   b
7278 11N 12E Cro   20   b
7279 06S 63E Bxo    0   b    2


Optical and x-ray flares in 09.09.92.

Date     Beg. Max. End   Posit. Xray Opt
----------------------------------------
09.09.92 0153 0213 0249  .   .  M3.1
09.09.92 1756 1803 1843 11S 78W M1.9 SF


 
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABBS AstroMail, the first and most popular German astronomical bulletin board
------------------------- for amateur astronomers ----------------------------
    + 49 5851 7896 / V.21, V.22, V.22bis, V.32, V.42, V.42bis and MNP5
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
From: pad@galaxy.nsc.com (Paul Denny x8349)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: Almost full moon - Who cares?
Date: 11 Sep 92 21:18:11 GMT
Organization: National Semiconductor, Santa Clara

In article <1992Sep10.215721.10737@linus.mitre.org>, chaloux@mandolin.mitre.org (Dave Chaloux) writes:
> I suspect like many of you, I go through monthly cycles. As full moon
> approaches I grow more and more restless, desperate, etc. I woke up
> just before 4:00 a.m. this morning (9/10/92) and decided I just had to
> observe something. [observations deleted...]

well at 21:38 last Sunday 09/06 I was looking up from the swimming pool
of our apartments in south San Francisco Bay area - the moon was very
bright as were the street lights and neon signs :( . Throug this murk
you could just about make out Deneb and three quarters of Cygnus which
was pretty much overhead. Suddenly a huge fireball materialised about
where lacerta should have been and it descended without leaving a visible
trail toward the horizon. I don't know the magnitude because there was
nothing appraching its brightness apart from the moon but I would not
be surprised if it was 50 times brighter than Deneb - Deneb was just about
visible as a dim point - this thing caught my wifes eye and she wasn't
looking up! It descended fairly slowly and was visible for about 2 seconds
before it extinguished as rapidly as it had appeared having covered a
angle about 1.5 times that subtended by cygnus' wings.

Anyone else see it? any suggestions to what it was?
From: Cynedd@cup.portal.com (Kenneth W Durham)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: FTP Sites  Databases: Where???
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 16:04:34 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)


Ds anyone know where I can find databases of Extra-Galactic
Objects (galaxies, planetary nebulae, etc.), including databases of
Stars?
I have the ; but would like more than is listed.
         ^ Yale BSC.
Thanks in advance,
 
Ken
 ____________________________                            _________________
| Facilis descensus Avernii; |______                    |An it Harm None, |
| Noctes atque dies patet atri janua|____            ___|  Do as Ye Will. |
| Ditis; Sed revocate gradum, superaque  |_____     |   |-----------------|
| evadere ad auras, Hoc opus, hic labor est.   |__  |o  |Death is But A   |
|                                   Virgil        |_|___|   DoorWay to    |
|_______________________________________________________|Ultimate Reality.|
| Cynedd@cup.portal.com  | loreli!cynedd@solar.nova.edu |||||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From: lpb@florida.swdc.stratus.com (Len Bucuvalas)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: Is NASA really planning to Terraform Mars?
Date: 9 Sep 92 00:30:08 GMT

In article <rabjab.82.0@golem.ucsd.edu> rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu (Jeff Bytof) writes:
>
>>barry@chezmoto.ai.mit.edu (Barry Kort) writes:
>>> A colleague of mine, who claims to be knowledgeable in such matters
>>> tells me:
>>> 
>>>         A fairly large team <at NASA>, is planning the terraforming
>>>         of Mars, which involves destroying the planet as we know it.
>>>         Mars will be raised 20 degrees C.  And with minimal study of
>>>         that planet it becomes clear what chain of events will occur.
>>>         After this chain Mars will be 'polluted' with earth-based
>>>         micro-organisms and rugged plant life.
>>> 
>>> Can anyone confirm, deny, or refute the above, or otherwise
>>> elaborate on NASA's plans with respect to Mars?
>
>The first step in accomplishing the above objective would
>be for NASA to venusiform Congress.   :-)
>
>Jeff Bytof
>rabjab@golem.ucsd.edu
>
>>Thanks!  --ralf

I read somewhere over this weekend that the first step they
would take to terraforming an allegedly lifeless planet is to
explode one or more thermonuclear warheads in the
atmosphere...the thought being that this would generate CO2.

Is there any validity to this thinking at all???
No flames please .... just an answer would be appreciated.

TIA,
Len
--
*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
The accountability of government has gone to the point where the very
use of the law is the instrument of illegality.
		-- Ralph Nader @ Harvard Law School, 1/15/92
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen)
Subject: Re: When is the annular eclipse over Kansas?
Organization: Institute for Astronomy, Hawaii
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 21:52:10 GMT

Ernest Wolfe writes:

> My in-laws in Kansas say that there will be an annular solar eclipse
> there sometime next spring or the following spring and want to have
> an eclipse party. It is necessary, however, to know the exact date since
> the wine will need to be aged for a while and we need to breed the cattle
> for preparing steaks. Can anyone on the net furnish this vital information?
> Also, any info on the time of day, degree of coverage, and will we be
> disapointed? I experienced the total eclipse in Norfolk a few years
> ago and it was almost a religeous experience. I have not experienced
> an annular so I'm not sure what to expect. Any wisdom? Thanks in advance.

The eclipse is on 1994 May 10.  The time obviously depends on your location,
but in that area it will be around 16 UT, or 11 a.m. CDT.  Consult the
Farmers' Almanac about whether you'll be disappointed.
Newsgroups: sci.astro,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave
From: oler@rho.uleth.ca (Cary Oler)
Subject: Daily Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for 04 September
Organization: University of Lethbridge
Date:  7 Sep 92 09:19:43 GMT

!!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 248, 09/04/92
10.7 FLUX=104.7  90-AVG=124        SSN=080      BKI=4455 4335  BAI=037
BGND-XRAY=B3.6     FLU1=3.7E+06  FLU10=1.6E+04  PKI=4455 5335  PAI=035
  BOU-DEV=064,068,109,097,043,025,029,081   DEV-AVG=065 NT     SWF=01:012
 XRAY-MAX= M2.5   @ 2352UT    XRAY-MIN= B3.4   @ ****UT   XRAY-AVG= B7.9
NEUTN-MAX= ****%  @ ****UT   NEUTN-MIN= ****%  @ ****UT  NEUTN-AVG= **.*%
  PCA-MAX= **.*DB @ ****UT     PCA-MIN= **.*DB @ ****UT    PCA-AVG= **.*DB
BOUTF-MAX=*****NT @ ****UT   BOUTF-MIN=*****NT @ ****UT  BOUTF-AVG=*****NT
GOES7-MAX=P:****NT@ ****UT   GOES7-MIN=N:****NT@ ****UT  G7-AVG=****,****,****
GOES6-MAX=P:****NT@ ****UT   GOES6-MIN=E:****NT@ ****UT  G6-AVG=****,****,****
 FLUXFCST=STD:105,100,100;SESC:105,100,100 BAI/PAI-FCST=020,015,010/020,015,010
    KFCST=3344 4333 4412 2111  27DAY-AP=010,012   27DAY-KP=3223 3232 2333 2333
 WARNINGS=*SWF;*GSTRM;*AURMIDWRN
   ALERTS=**MINFLR:M2.5@2352UTC
!!END-DATA!!

Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: A5361DAF@vm.univie.ac.at
Subject: Needed: Sun rise/set program
Organization: University of Vienna
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 08:03:36 GMT

Help !!!

What I need is a program (MS-DOS) that calculates at least the sunset
for a specify place (longtitude/latitude) and date.
It would be better if it also calculates sunrise, and the time for
a specify zenith distance.
If it's possible I would like to get also the source code.

If you have such a program or you know where I can get it (FTP,...), then
please let me know.

Thank you,

Michael Gruenberger.
                                    Bitnet: A5361DAF at AWIUNI11
                                  Internet: A5361DAF at VM.UNIVIE.AC.AT
From: jordan@warped.pnl.gov (Randy Jordan)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: Is NASA really planning to Terraform Mars?
Date: 4 Sep 92 22:14:04 GMT
Article-I.D.: oracle.1992Sep4.221404.25277
Distribution: sci
Organization: Battelle Pacific Northwest Labs, Richland, WA


In article <BARRY.92Sep3204200@chezmoto.ai.mit.edu>, barry@chezmoto.ai.mit.edu (Barry Kort) writes:
|> Barry Kort
|> Visiting Scientist
|> Educational Technology Research
|> BBN Labs
|> Cambridge, MA

	Pretty arrogant of NASA and fairly premature to be spending
	Its limited budgit on such things.
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: lew@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (lewis.h.mammel..jr)
Subject: Re: bolide sighting
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 14:40:44 GMT
Summary: bolide == fireball

In article <8eh2lQW00XsF4CWV1K@andrew.cmu.edu>, dh4j+@andrew.cmu.edu (David O Hunt) writes:
> Pardon my ignorance, but what is a "bolide"?
> 
> David
> dh4j@cmu.edu


A bolide is a fireball, i.e. a very bright meteor with a trail.
I guess it has the same root as "bolometer". "Bolide" isn't in
the Webster's Collegiate dictionaries ( I looked in the seventh
and ninth editions. ) It is in the glossary of Petersen's Field
Guide to the Stars and Planets.

I guess "bright bolide" is redundant. Also, they originate
from outer space, not Wheaton, IL :-)


Lew Mammel, Jr.
Newsgroups: sci.astro,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.shortwave
From: oler@rho.uleth.ca (Cary Oler)
Subject: Daily Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for 05 September
Organization: University of Lethbridge
Date:  7 Sep 92 09:35:51 GMT

!!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 249, 09/05/92
10.7 FLUX=119.3  90-AVG=124        SSN=080      BKI=5554 3333  BAI=028
BGND-XRAY=B9.2     FLU1=5.3E+06  FLU10=1.3E+04  PKI=5554 3234  PAI=027
  BOU-DEV=088,118,079,053,026,026,025,028   DEV-AVG=055 NT     SWF=02:032
 XRAY-MAX= M4.0   @ 1132UT    XRAY-MIN= B6.5   @ ****UT   XRAY-AVG= C2.3
NEUTN-MAX= ****%  @ ****UT   NEUTN-MIN= ****%  @ ****UT  NEUTN-AVG= **.*%
  PCA-MAX= **.*DB @ ****UT     PCA-MIN= **.*DB @ ****UT    PCA-AVG= **.*DB
BOUTF-MAX=*****NT @ ****UT   BOUTF-MIN=*****NT @ ****UT  BOUTF-AVG=*****NT
GOES7-MAX=P:****NT@ ****UT   GOES7-MIN=N:****NT@ ****UT  G7-AVG=****,****,****
GOES6-MAX=P:****NT@ ****UT   GOES6-MIN=E:****NT@ ****UT  G6-AVG=****,****,****
 FLUXFCST=STD:120,120,115;SESC:120,120,115 BAI/PAI-FCST=015,015,015/015,015,015
    KFCST=3344 4333 4412 2111  27DAY-AP=012,010   27DAY-KP=2333 2333 3333 3222
 WARNINGS=*SWF;*AURMIDWCH
   ALERTS=**MINFLR:M4.0@1132UTC;**SWEEP:II=1;**TENFLR:140SFU
!!END-DATA!!