HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: don.fischer@brent.uucp (Don Fischer) 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: ? about PM .qwk reader
Date: 11 Oct 92 18:04:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Brentwood BBS Harrison, NY  914-835-7898
Reply-To: don.fischer@brent.uucp (Don Fischer) 

MK> Hello.  I am using the wide-release beta of the KWQ mail reader for
OS2 2.0. 
MK>  
MK> Well, actually, I am trying to use it.  Does anyone know how to get
it to 
MK> open a mail packet?  Does it require some special unzipper?  I keep

MK> getting errors using pkunzip v1.93a and info-zip v5.0. 
 
The beta releases of KWQ required an OS/2 Specific PKUNZIP.  However,
version 1.0 (release), which is now available, will work with DOS or OS/2
archivers. 
 
Lots of other improvements - be sure to pick up a copy.

---
 . KWQ/2 1.0 .
From: loflin (Don Loflin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Shredder vs. Trash (was: Why OS/2 **WILL** fail)
Date: 13 Oct 92 15:47:11 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin

In article <9v3-Hc+@engin.umich.edu> jwh@citi.umich.edu writes:

>|> I'm not aware of how shadows work on the technical level, but the info
>|> should be with the shadow.  A shadow should look and act like just another
>|> program/file on disk, but it is a link to the real program/file.
>|> 
>
>I agree.  Also, a shadow should be visible and creatable from a command
>line session.

Definitely.  Shadows would then be (and should be) the equivalent of 
symbolic (not hard) links in UNIX, something which OS/2 (and every OS) 
sorely needs.  Some time ago there was a thread about links in the file 
system, which seemed to concentrate on hard and soft links.  I think most 
people find symbolic links the most useful, and extending shadows to the 
command line and file API would provide this functionality.

It seems easy enough -- a dummy file with EAs describing the location of
the original, and any settings which should be used instead of the original's.
For example, PULSE.EXE could have a shadow named "OS/2 Monitor" which points
to the original.  It perhaps has a different icon associated with it.  Two
things need to change to support this.  First and most important, OS/2 must
recognize shadow files and look to the original when open/reading/writing/
loading files (this might have to be done in the IFS, but can perhaps
be kept independent of it, as long as the IFS supports EAs).  Second and
optional (but way overdue), the OS/2 loader should stop using the extension 
(.EXE, .CMD, etc) to determine whether something is executable, and just look 
at the type.  The type is part of the EAs under WPS now, but is apparently 
not used -- my OS2CHESS.EXE has "plain text" as the type.  It executes
fine, so it seems the WPS doesn't use the type -- although it *can* execute 
programs which don't have an extension (the WPS doesn't really care about 
the type though -- if I rename OS2CHESS.EXE to "OS/2 Chess", it still 
executes).  The command-line, however, can't execute something without an 
.EXE, .CMD, .COM, etc.  Sigh.  Let's join the rest of the world (Mac, Unix,
 etc) and stop specifying executables by extension.
 

-------
Don Loflin
loflin@emx.cc.utexas.edu
(512) 471-3241 x413
Just my opinions....  


P.S. Would someone from IBM please forward this as a request to the OS/2
developers? Thanks.


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: jbhuber@iastate.edu (Joseph B Huber)
Subject: Re: Help with gnu man.
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 17:53:35 GMT

In article <1992Oct11.130039.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
writes:
[regarding the port of gnu man]
>There seems to be a bug in the "auto generate formatted pages" code.
>Make a directory /man/man1/ and put, say, du.1 in it. Make a directory
>/man/cat1/. man should auto gen a formated page and place it in cat1 (for
>faster reading next time, I guess). This fails on my system (386-33, no
>patches, 4os2, HPFS, 8M, no-87, VGA) due to a "file not available"-type 
>message (I forget the exact message, but I believe that man is preventing
>access to du.1 when it later tries to generate the formatted page). 

I don't know which man program was ported by Kai, but I just ported a man
program written by Edward C. Bennett for my own use which had the same bug.

The program checks to see if the preformatted man page exists. If it does not
exist, catstat.st_mtime is set to -1. However, in emx/gcc, stat.st_mtime is
defined as an unsigned long, and assigning it a negative number makes
catstat.st_time very very large. A comparison is made to manstat.st_mtime, and
because catstat.st_mtime is so large, the program is fooled into thinking that
the preformatted manpage exits and the man tries to display it.

I replaced the '-1' by a '0' in that particular statement and all seems to
work fine.

-- 
Joe Huber 
(jbhuber@iastate.edu)        | Capt. James T. Kirk on the 2nd law of thermo: 
Dept. of Mech. Egr.          |  "It's not a hundred percent efficient,
Iowa State University        |   but nothing ever is."
From: vapspgd@prism.gatech.EDU (Edward Hefter)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Fax Programs for OS/2
Date: 11 Oct 92 22:46:06 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

Herbert Neugebauer writes:
>I already know, that there are two or three of them. But 
>can they also be used for class 1 (group 3 of course) modems??

PMFax works with CLass 1, Class 2, and Intel's SatisFaxtion.


-- 
                                Edward Hefter
                   Trying To Survive the Ga Tech Experience
                         vapspgd@prism.gatech.edu
From: Pete.Norloff@f347.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Pete Norloff)
Sender: Uucp@blkcat.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Reviews: GammaTech, Sytos Plus, PMFax, HA5
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 23:35:06 -0500

>>GAMMATECH

>>The new, 32-bit version of the GammaTech utilities has been released.
>>For more information on this product, contact GammaTech at
>>405-359-1219 or FAX 405-359-7391.

 JBH> Does anyone care to comment on the unerase feature?  
 JBH> Specifically, does the HPFS unerase require that the 
 JBH> recovered file be targeted to another drive?

With HPFS, recovering to a different drive is recommended and chances of
recovery diminish if you recover to the same drive, but you can override this
and recover to the same drive if neccessary.  With FAT disks, recovery must be
done to a different drive.

 JBH> Also, how fast 
 JBH> is it to unerase a file on an HPFS drive?  In short, does it 
 JBH> work like, say, the Norton unerase program for DOS, or is it 
 JBH> more like the Phoenix OS/2 unerase program, or neither?

After identifying the file to be undeleted, recovery is usually very swift (on a
par with Norton).  With large HPFS volumes, analyzing the drive in search of
deleted files can take some time though.

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: baer@uwovax.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: MS Word for OS/2
Organization: University of Western Ont, London
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 03:31:33 GMT

In article <1992Oct14.114916.23984@dragon.acadiau.ca>, 870086t@dragon.acadiau.ca (Shannon Tremblay) writes:
> hi all,
> 
> does anyone have first hand experience with MS Word for OS/2.
> I read an article in PC/Computing ( August, '92 ) that states
> that Word for OS/2 is not as fast as Word for Windows, depending
> on the task being performed.
>
I ran MS Word 1.1 for OS/2 when I was running OS/2 1.2 then 1.3 about
two years ago.  Ran it for about 1 year.  It was slower than the Windows
version, but it ran reasonably well under OS/2.  I canned it because:
a) no graphics filter support (e.g., I couldn't bring in TIFF files with
it), b) some problems with printer support, c) some other bugs that
I cannot remember.   Until Word 2.0 came out, I *did* run both 1.1 for 
OS/2 and 1.1 for Windows, using the former when I was composing (and 
had OS/2 1.3 up) and the latter when I needed to bring in graphics files
or print.  It was a real pain in the **** that the file formats were
not 100% compatible -- one had to use a filter from os/2 to save in a 
format that could be read by Windows 1.1  (by contrast, Word Perfect's
philosophy appears to be "one file format for all versions -- a file
created in DOS can be read by WP for Windows or WP OS/2 [alas, the
latter remains vapourware, unless you call WP 5.0 for OS/2 the real
thing]).   

When Word 2.0 came out and when I installed os/2 2.0, I gave up on 
the os/2 version of word, since I would otherwise miss the goodies
in word 2.0  (once a file is created in word 2.0, it cannot be "passed
back" to word 1.1 for os/2).  Word 2.0 under os/2 is *slow* in firing up,
but not too bad after that.   If Word Perfect ever follows through on
its promise to put out a PM version, then I will probably stop using
word.   I've already sent too much $$$ in Bill Gate's direction.

 
> Is this true?
> If so, what is the purpose of going to a 32bit operating system.
> I thought it was supposed to be faster, as well as multi-tasking!!
When true 32-bit applications become more common, then you'll see.
Right now, there's no question that word processing apps are slower.
But even at that, some of my 16-bit app's run a lot better under os/2
(e.g., comm. software, etc.).  
> 
> The next question is obvious; do I buy MS Word for Windows or for 
> OS/2 ? 
If you're going to buy MS Word at all, I'd recommend MS word for windows.
Get 2.0a or 2.0b -- 2.0 has lots of nifty bugs that Microsoft itself admits
to.
> 
> Any Ideas,
> 
> Shannon Tremblay
> Computer Science Student
> Acadia University
> NS, Canada
> 
> shannon.tremblay@acadiau.ca
> 
> 
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Douglas Baer, Department of Sociology,
University of Western Ontario, London, Canada N6A 5C2
Internet: BAER@UWOVAX.UWO.CA
From: hilmera@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (Andrew Hilmer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: TE/2 ASCII uploads and disappearing cursor
Date: 12 Oct 92 06:01:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: CS.1992Oct12.060136.3680
Organization: Oregon State University, Computer Science Dept.

os2.apps
 
I have two problems with TE/2, both of which might be TE/2.FAQs.
  
I cannot get ASCII uploads to run at a decent speed. No matter what I 
set the line pacing at, it uploads a line, waits 7 to 10 seconds, then 
sends the next line. This is extremely annoying. I used to use ASCII 
uploads a lot with Telix, but this behavior is really putting a crimp on
the way I telecommunicate.
   
The second problem is that I lose the cursor (in 132x43 text mode) when 
I switch to other sessions during downloads.
    
If these questions have been answered ad-nauseum before, just send me 
email.
     
I think that there should be a comp.sys.os2.apps FAQ, with a short 
section on common problems and questions for each high-bandwith app, 
ie EPM, TE/2, GCC and the other Gnu ports.  Sources of further 
information should be listed, at a minimum.  
      
For example, the section for TE/2 could:  list the symptoms of the old, 
buggy, COMMPAK.DLL and sources for the latest version; list other common 
problems (like disappearing cursors, destructive backspace, etc.)  and 
their solutions; mention the shareware status and price of the package
and give the email and USnailMail address of Oberon software.
     
andy

-- 
Andrew Hilmer -- all mail to hilmera@mist/storm.cs.orst.edu routed to:
hilmera@ucs.orst.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: "andrew makiejewski" <andrew.makiejewski@canrem.com>
Subject: ami pro 3.0 on os/2 2
Reply-To: "andrew makiejewski" <andrew.makiejewski@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: comp
Date: 11 Oct 92 00:58:16 EST



SUBJ: Ami Pro 3.0 on OS/2 2.0

Message to gt0554c@prism.gatech.EDU re: message <70449@hydra.gatech.EDU>
in comp.os.os2.apps from gt0554c@prism.gatech.EDU to ALL

M >   Newsgroup: comp.os.os2.apps
M >  Message-ID: <70449@hydra.gatech.EDU>
M >     Subject: Ami Pro 3.0 on OS/2 2.0

M > I am thinking about purchasing Ami Pro 3.0 for windows, but I would like
M > to use it under OS/2 2.0. Are there any special problems or settings I
M > should know about? I think Ami Pro 3.0 does not use Windows 3.1 features.
M > Am I correct?

Lots of people are running it just fine under OS/2 2.0. The only little thing
is that the HELP files are in a different format. If I remember right, you
either have to unpack them or if you have Windows 3.1, copy the win3.1
help program into your os2\mdos\winos2 dir.

I am still contemplating wether to go for 3.0 or wait for the OS/2
version due out early next probably.

Andrew.                      Andrew.Makiejewski@canrem.uucp 
Entered Oct 10,92 at 23:52:31 on CRS from Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
---
  PMDBM  V1.75 #33  I use OS/2 2.0 and I don't care who knows!
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Virtualizing greater than 320x200 images to desktop
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:24:53 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Oct6.005003.12561@muddcs.claremont.edu> ileicht@jarthur.claremont.edu (Spiff) writes:
>It seems that whenver i try and get a graphics program to the
>desktop it gives me an error that OS/2 does not support that
>graphics mode...
>
>EI have a trident 8900 and am runing an 800x560x256 desktop.
>
>I know that it has worked before... whats the deal?? 

16-color screens don't (currently) get virtualized to a window.
Apparantly it takes a lot of overhead to read the 4-plane screen maps
and then (in real-time) convert the image to a 1-plane 8-bit display.
8-bit displays (currently, only 320x200x256) will virtualize fine, as
will all 4-color and 2-color modes.

-- 
David Charlap         |"there aren't 50,000 things for which it's worth writing
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu| software; and the computer industry doesn't have enough
----------------------+ programmers to create that much good software.
Therefore, most of it must be worthless" -- Boris Beizer "The Frozen Keyboard"
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: laird@stable.ecn.purdue.edu (Kyler Laird)
Subject: Re: MS Word for OS/2
Keywords: MS WORD, OS/2
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: 15 Oct 92 01:38:02 GMT

I got some nasty looks (and then some) when I informed everyone in my
dept. that MS Word (for PM) would be phased out.  When I demoed DeScribe
(the demo version, no less!) all was better.  It's a great product.

--kyler
From: jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: MOD player for OS/2 2.0?
Date: 7 Oct 92 19:27:08 GMT
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711

das9674@usl.edu (Stephenson Daniel A) writes:
>In article <1992Oct7.055554.23510@muddcs.claremont.edu> jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim) writes:

>>DOS box.  MTMOD is another DOS MOD player, this one was specifically
>>designed to work under a multitasking system like OS/2, Windows,
>>and DeskView.

>Where might I find this MTMOD?  I tried archie and it couldn't find it.

>That would be WAY cool.  With it could we expect it to play music fine
>even though we're doing something intensive?

No more requests please!

I'll nab a copy from my friend's BBS and put it on ftp-os2.nmsu.edu
first chance I get.  The guy who wrote it is from Germany or thereabouts
and calls his BBS about once a month.  I hear he's also working on
making WOWII more multitasking-friendly.  Expect it sometime tonight
unless I post otherwise.

Don't expect too much from it.  It's designed with multitasking in mind,
but it's still DOS.  It ran better in the background than any other
player I had, but it still skipped and jumped during heavy activity
(Of course most of the other players started to skip and jump the
instant I put them in the background).  Also, it's for the SB, not the
SBPro so you only get mono.
-- 
John H. Kim                 | (This space to be filled when I
jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu | think of something very clever 
uunet!jarthur!jokim         | to use as a disclaimer)
From: jdecarlo@mitre.org (John DeCarlo)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: XMS/EMS IN A DOS VDM
Date: 9 Oct 92 18:32:39 GMT
Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean  VA

In article <1992Oct9.151916.17106@njitgw.njit.edu> dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:
>From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
>Subject: Re: XMS/EMS IN A DOS VDM
>Date: 9 Oct 92 15:19:16 GMT
>In article <jdecarlo.304.718395964@mitre.org> jdecarlo@mitre.org (John DeCarlo) writes:
>>In article <530.182.uupcb@scintill>
>> john.hines@scintill (John Hines)  writes:
>>
>>>Is there any way to get either XMS or EMS memory in a DOS vdm (boot from
>>>drive a) window?  I've got a DOS application that I need to run in a vdm
>>>that wants either XMS or EMS.  I've tried the HIMEM.SYS in the /OS2/MDOS
>>>directory, and it doesn't do it.
>>>                                      -John
>>
>>How did you do it before OS/2?  What DOS are you booting?  If you are 
>>booting MS-DOS 5.0, it comes with EMM386.EXE for EMS.  And it comes with 
>>HIMEM.SYS for XMS (I think).  Remember, you aren't using OS/2 (including 
>>MDOS) if you need a VDM.
>
>No.  IBM explicitly states that this will fail.  Oddly enough, I've
>used the \OS2\MDOS\HIMEM.SYS to get me XMS.  You may also need to use
>the DOS settings so that the HIMEM.SYS driver will know how much to
>provide.

Ooops.  In the Command Reference, look up Booting Specific DOS (?) (related 
info when looking up VMDISK).  Item (1) is to use FSFILTER.SYS, item (2) is 
to replace calls to HIMEM.SYS or EMM386.SYS with calls to the programs of 
the same name in the \OS2\MDOS directory.

Sorry for the misinformation.

John DeCarlo, MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA--My views are my own
Fidonet:  1:109/131  Internet:  jdecarlo@mitre.org
From: prk@cie.uoregon.edu (Peter R. Knox)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Is there an EVE port for OS/2?
Date: 17 Oct 92 03:26:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: nntp.1992Oct17.032634.20161
Organization: University of Oregon Campus Information Exchange

I am interrested in finding out if there is a shareware/freeware OS/2 port of
the VMS text editor EVE.  I have not seen one on ftp-os2.mnsu.edu

Please reply by E-Mail.
Pete
prk@cie.uoregon.edu
From: marten@feki.toppoint.de (Marten Feldtmann)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Enhanced Editor 5.51 -> error when leaving
Distribution: world
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 92 10:30:11 GMT
Organization: Private OS/2 System

marten@feki.toppoint.de writes in article <718626478snx@feki.toppoint.de>:

>  adr: 19f471ba: ETKE551.DLL 0019 .......

 and  ETKR551.DLL 0028

 MF

--
Marten Feldtmann,     Kieler Str. 29,       2300 Kiel 14,    Germany
E-Mail: marten@tpki.toppoint.de, FAX possible
From: hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Communications Software for 2.0
Date: 8 Oct 92 00:41:52 GMT
Organization: Auburn University, AL

In article <Oct.7.16.58.32.1992.18548@gandalf.rutgers.edu>, lclarke@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Lee Clarke) writes:
> singh@r-node.gts.org (Rajendra Singh) writes:
> I've been using c-kermit, available from watsun and hobbes (I think),
> for a few months now, and like it very much. It operates beautifully
> in the background, even though it's not an OS2 app. On the other
> hand, it is free and supported by every computer I've ever called. 

C-Kermit is available in an OS/2 port. I do not know anything about the
MSDOS port. C-Kermit 5A(179) has been avail for some time in 
pub/os2/all/comm/ck5a179.*. A newer beta of 183 was posted some time ago.

179 has vt102 emulation problems. Almost all have been fixed in 183. 184
beta still has the "cursor up just moves text down" bug.

Try ftp-os2.nmsu.edu for 179 and 183. 
--darrel hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
From: swee.cheng@freddy.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Swee Cheng) 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Freedom of Press: Problem
Date: 7 Oct 92 13:14:00 GMT
Reply-To: swee.cheng@freddy.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Swee Cheng) 
Distribution: world
Organization: Freddy's Place BBS - Edmonton, AB - 403-456-4241

Has anyone use Freedom of Press under OS/2 ver 2.0 DOS box? I have hard
time printing the complete print job that Freedom of Press has sent.
Any suggestion ?

.... SWEE CHENG LEE ....
---
 . DeLuxe. 1.25 #1347s . Do you really read taglines??
             
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: gary@access.digex.com (Gary L. Bobzien)
Subject: EZ Lan
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 15:26:50 GMT

A business associate is currently running DOS 5.0 using EZ LAN 2.0. He
is considering a switch to OS/2 but isn't sure if he can still use EZ LAN.
The other computers are not interested in switching to OS/2 or a different
LAN package.

Can anyone tell me if EZ Lan will run under OS/2 2.0 and what, if any, are
the tricks to make it work.

Thank you.

Gary Bobzien
From: rshelley@riscy.simplot.com (Robert Shelley)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Found.000... (?)
Date: 7 Oct 92 11:53:47 GMT
Organization: J. R. Simplot Co., Boise Id.

That found.000 is created by CHKDSK when it finds problems.  Your
desktop will do the REBUILD thing sometimes when you delete
subdirectories off your disk, at least mine does.

Robert
From: nevries@accucx.cc.ruu.nl (Nico E de Vries)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Powerbuilder frontend under OS/2 2.0
Date: 13 Oct 92 15:02:50 GMT
Organization: Academic Computer Centre Utrecht

In <1992Oct13.112302.27771@cpqhou.compaq.com> thomasr@cpqhou.compaq.com (Thomas Rush) writes:

>Has anyone any hints for accessing Unix SQL Server databases from
>a WinOS2 client?  I have ftp TCP/IP, and can use it successfully 
>to rlogin to the host, but any DOS or Windows client under OS2 is
>looking for something I don't have.

>I'd love to use ObjectView, or some such, but the project requires
>Powerbuilder.

The PC magazine of september 1992 (US edition) has a special on
SQL frontends. Powerbuilder and ObjectView are both covered.


>thomas rush

Nico E. de Vries  (nevries@cc.ruu.nl) |------------------*   AA   III  PPP
_ This text is supplied AS IS, no warranties of any kind |  A  A   I   P  P
| apply. No rights can be derived from this text. This   |  AAAA   I   PPP
| text is likely to contain spelling and grammar errors. |  A  A   I   P
*---------------------------( Donate to GreenPeace! )----*  A  A  III  P

"The IBM PC is still waiting for a version of the CP/M OS.", G.M. Vose, 1982.
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Killer apps
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:22:49 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <OLAVT.92Oct7133455@ulrik.uio.no> olavt@ulrik.uio.no (Olav Torvund) writes:
>
>Lotus Smartsuite (1-2-3, Freelance and Ami Pro) will probably be
>available before the end of the year. It these are multhitreaded
>applications, they should really take advantage of the power of OS/2.

They should be multithreaded.  I know that the 16-bit FreeLance for
OS/2 was.
-- 
David Charlap         |"there aren't 50,000 things for which it's worth writing
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu| software; and the computer industry doesn't have enough
----------------------+ programmers to create that much good software.
Therefore, most of it must be worthless" -- Boris Beizer "The Frozen Keyboard"
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: evanc@uuisis.isis.org (Evan Champion)
Subject: Coupons from IBM
Organization: International Shared Information Service (Ottawa)
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 92 01:01:04 GMT


Is IBM still offering that coupon book?  If so, where do I order it from?