HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: fbrown@ssd.kodak.com ()
Subject: Re: New low for 76ers
Organization: Eastman Kodak
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 18:44:21 GMT

Frank
>>But Eric, he has zero against the Knicks.  Ya never know if Aguirre is
>>going to play or Arrrrrgh!uire is showing up.  :+)
>>
>Maybe, but either way the Knicks game is a bad comparison cuz he played
>only 7 minutes, vs 32 min in the 76ers game.
>
>>--
>> Tony Wesley					 awesley@vela.acs.oakland.edu
>
>--Eric


Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: urbano@ll.mit.edu (John Urbano)
Subject: Dee Brown
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 20:02:14 GMT

 I'd be interested in hearing (reading) some opinions
 on Dee Brown, especially on the subject of 
 Dee Brown vs Sherm Douglas vs John Bagley.

 Who should the Celtics go with short term (playoffs)?
 How about long term?

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: igor@csa.uiuc.edu (Igor Sheyn)
Subject: Re: Another Bird man
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 20:39:28 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.125623.13899@ll.mit.edu>, nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith) writes:
|> In article <1992Apr16.012700.1032@wpi.WPI.EDU> jcaproni@gelfand (Joseph Barry Caproni) writes:
|> >
|> >However, if Dee Brown comes back then Bird will be needed. Brown cannot run
|> >the offense by himself at this time. I think that it is very fourtunate that
|> >Brown went out after Bird. Without Bird on the floor, I think Dee might have
|> >lost some of the recent games if Ford decided to use him at point guard.
|> >
|> >Finally, considering that their replacements are shooting far better than
|> >they are, I would keep Bird & Brown as reserves until another team's
|> >defense finally figures out how to handle the current lineup.
|> >
|> >.                                                    -Joe
|> 
|> yunno, i was thinking the same thing the other day.  at this point (after
|> boston beat detroit and atlanta beat new york), i would think the LAST thing
|> chris ford would want to do is break up the pattern.  bring bird off the bench
|> in a few key places, but dont aggrevate that back.  dee can do some 2 guard
|> time when they have Lewis at small forward and he can do some point.  ford
|> should play the matchups with these 2 guys, leaving the current rotations
|> close to what they are now.
|> 
|> - nate


As long as Bird is playing for Celtics, he'll never be coming from the bench.
And it's the way it's supposed to be!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Celtic stuff
From: rrm@icf.hrb.com (MURPH)
Date: 13 Apr 92 09:30:08 EST
Organization: HRB Systems, Inc.

The race to the finish. Four games left and the Celts are down by only one
game. You must say they are one of the hottest teams right now. 13 wins in
their last 14 games. Lastnight Lewis had 35 making 14 of 15 shots. Even with
Bird and Brown out the Celts are looking good. The Celts have some tough
remaining games left, but hopefully they can grab hold of first or at least
get a tie with the Knicks. I think the Celts win it if there is a tie for
first. Hopefully. I heard Brown might be back Tuesday night against the sixers
and i haven't heard anything about Bird. It wouldn't surprise me if he stays
out until the playoffs. Thats all for now. GO CELTS


                                                 Murph
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: jachano@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (Jay Chanowitz)
Subject: Triangle offense
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 16:11:41 GMT

Could anyone explain Tex Winter's triangle offense?  I haven't read his 
book, and whenever they mention that the Bull's are running it on a 
particular offensive series, the camera angle is always too tight to see 
more than Stern's autograph on the ball.

Thanks.


Jay Chanowitz     Pacific Bell       (510) 823-9154  
{att,bellcore,sun,ames,pyramid}!pacbell.com!jachano
From: tron@tc.fluke.COM (Peter Barbee)
Subject: Re: Call for Discussion: rec.sport.basketball.meeks/lor
Keywords: It's time
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 20:42:42 GMT

In article <1992Apr3.200351.28129@ennews.eas.asu.edu> koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann) writes:
>This is a proposal to add a news group for Meeks, Lor, and all the
>other idiots that waste Internet bandwidth on childish discussion
>about who is statistically better than who, who's dad could kick
>who's dad's ass, and other assorted BS.

Not only could my dad kick your dad's ass he could kick Tom Chambers' ass
and, statistically speaking, is a better ass-kicker than the purported
champion ass-kicker Dan Majerle.

And then some,
Peter B
From: edmunds@vaxr.llnl.gov
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Warriors
Date: 14 Apr 92 23:25:40 GMT
Organization: LLNL_LIS


  xjam@cork.CS.Berkeley.EDU (The Crossjammer) writes:
  > So Gidi, who's going to prevent the Mailman from having his daily fill of
  > Warriors for breakfast? The guy seems to be actually enjoying stomping all
  > over the Warriors this year and they haven't even come close to stopping
  > him. Big or small, fat or thin, long or short, the Warriors have done
  > nothing to even hint that they can shut down the Stockton to Malone entry
  > pass if needed.

  I thought Tyrone Hill was effective against Malone last night. Of course,
he fouled out after 12 minutes.  Lister started out tough, but got three
fouls and a technical in the first five minutes.  I think, as you say,
they may work on denying Stockton an easy entry pass, maybe by playing
Marchiulionis or Askew on him, and letting Hardaway watch Jeff Malone.
But that doesn't sound real promising, either.

-- Dave Edmunds
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: bs344@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Benjamin Bass)
Subject: Re: Hottest team in the NBA
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 22:06:37 GMT


Dan ... no kidding, they want to get rid of Stacey King.  The
Bulls have been shopping him heavily for the last year and a 
half, but no one is willing to bite.  His overweightness, whiny 
attitude, and highly publicized intentional holdouts from prac-
tice last season were all a part of his falling from favor with
Bulls team management.  Although he has tried to mend his ways
this season (losing weight, getting more into playing shape,
sporting a newly positive attitude, changing to #21 (Clemente's
number with Pittsburgh) from 34), he remains 11th or 12th man 
on the Bulls' bench and hasn't been getting many minutes. At this
point Phil Jackson is not going to rock the boat as they approach
the playoffs, so Stacey is likely to sit some more.
-- 
Ben Bass
University of Michigan
Internet:  Ben_Bass@um.cc.umich.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: joe@bach.cd.med.umich.edu (Joe Gillon)
Subject: Re: Pistons over Spurs 107-103....
Organization: University of Michigan Cardiology Lab
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 13:25:41 GMT

In article <14493@vela.acs.oakland.edu> awesley@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Tony Wesley) writes:
>joe@bach.cd.med.umich.edu (Joe Gillon) writes:
>
>I wrote:
>>>Arrrguire can't play defense like Rodman but he can add a whole new
>>>dimension by missing a bunch of shots.
>
>>Hey!  Dennis can miss shots too!
>
>Dennis can miss, yup, especially from the free throw line.  But he
>doesn't take as many as Mark.

Right you are - Mark is _paid_ to miss shots tho.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: sikorski@news.miami.edu (Richard Sikorski)
Subject: BOXSCORE was 89, mia 100 on 07apr92 at mia
Organization: R.S.M.A.S.
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 02:16:47 GMT

was 89, mia 100   07apr92

(mia) askins reported as 2-1 3Pt-ers, but 2-0 fits pt-totals.
(yeah, I checked USAToday too...)

was dressed only 9 players.  (was) ellison still out (pulled groin).
(was) eackles suspended for the game by coach WUnseld

(mia) rice scored all 10 in mia's 10-2 run at the end of Q1.
was couldnt come closer than 7 after that.

(mia) seikaly 17 reb's to top all today's gmaes.
mia still #9 for 8 playoff spots.

was (24-52)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
grant,harvey      42    7  21   0  1   6  7   5 11   3   4  3  1  1  0  0   20
stewart,larry     27    6   8   0  0   1  2   1  5   0   5  1  0  0  0  0   13
jones,charles     27    2   5   0  0   2  2   2  8   1   3  2  0  0  0  0    6
adams,michael     24    3  11   0  3   0  0   0  0   2   2  0  1  0  0  0    6
wingate,david     23    2   5   0  0   2  4   0  0   5   0  4  1  0  0  0    6
foster,greg       22    1   5   0  0   0  0   4  8   3   3  1  2  2  0  0    2
turner,andre      25    4  11   0  1   3  4   1  3   3   1  5  4  0  0  0   11
english,a.j.      21    4  11   0  1   1  1   0  1   1   3  1  1  0  0  0    9
smith,labradford  29    7  16   0  0   2  2   2  3   1   2  3  3  0  0  0   16
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
was totals       240   36  93   0  6  17 22  15 39  19  23 20 13  3  0  0   89
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .387   .000   .773       team rebs  8, team TO's 1

mia (35-42)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
long,grant        36    3   7   0  0   6  8   0  6   1   3  3  4  2  0  0   12
rice,glen         37    6  15   5  8   4  6   1  4   3   2  0  1  0  0  0   21
seikaly,rony      30    4   9   0  0   3  5   6 17   0   2  0  4  3  0  0   11
shaw,brian        29    3   4   0  0   4  6   0  5   3   1  2  4  0  0  0   10
smith,steve       28    7  11   1  3   0  0   0  1   5   3  1  0  0  0  0   15
coles,bimbo       18    4   7   0  0   0  0   1  3   0   2  1  5  0  0  0    8
askins,keith      19    0   3   0  2   2  2   3  3   2   3  2  0  0  0  0    2
edwards,kevin     21    4   9   1  2   4  4   1  2   0   0  0  3  0  0  0   13
kessler,alec      18    1   7   0  0   4  4   3 12   1   2  0  1  0  1  0    6
ogg,alan           4    1   3   0  0   0  0   1  2   0   0  1  2  1  0  0    2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mia totals       240   33  75   7 15  27 35  16 55  15  18 10 24  6  1  0  100
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .440   .467   .771       team rebs 10

was   21  22  21  25  -   89
mia   31  24  26  19  -  100

attendance 14824, time 2:01, officials: ETRush,GWillard,MWunderlich
-- 
^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^
 Richard Sikorski - Marine & Atmospheric Chemistry, U. Miami, FL
 Internet: sikorski@oj.rsmas.miami.edu        
v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
From: oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D. Oliver III)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Oh yeah smartypants?
Date: 14 Apr 92 04:17:55 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In article <kujimvINNs5u@utkcs2.cs.utk.edu> schulman@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (NEIL WAYNE SCHULMAN) wrote:
>  BTW, I am not ignorant, I be a Mensan, member # 1130662 with a 140 I.Q.,
> so what's yours?

Should have guessed that from the clever Subject line?

Mensa-type arguements bore me.  Let me know when you want to compare other
measurements.

--
____________________________
	Jim Oliver  
	oliver@athena.mit.edu /	joliver@hstbme.mit.edu
	oliver%mitwccf.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
From: oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D. Oliver III)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Can you buy players?
Date: 12 Apr 92 02:23:42 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In article <1992Apr11.181852.21211@techbook.com> jamesd@techbook.com (James Deibele) wrote:
> So, my neighbor and I are arguing over Duckworth as center, and he says
> that Paul Allen is loaded and should just buy Hakeem from the Rockets.
> I say that the Blazers can't do this, he says that they can, since the
> money wouldn't be going to Hakeem, it would be going to the Rockets.
> Since it's not going to a player, it shouldn't count against the cap.
> 
> So, what's the verdict?  Could the Lakers scrape together $40 or $50
> million and buy the rights to the Shaq?

These are different situations, but the part about purchasing the rights to
the player are the same: Hakeem is already under contract, and his
contract, which the Blazers would have to honor, is what counts against the
cap, not the purchase of the contract.

The Lakers could buy the rights to Shaq from another team for whatever
amount of money, and likewise none of this would count against the cap.
(Assuming that Shaw hadn't signed a contract yet.)
--
____________________________
	Jim Oliver  
	oliver@athena.mit.edu /	joliver@hstbme.mit.edu
	oliver%mitwccf.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith)
Subject: Re: Bird Draft
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 21:37:38 GMT

In article <kujfu7INNq0j@utkcs2.cs.utk.edu> schulman@hydra3f.cs.utk.edu (NEIL WAYNE SCHULMAN) writes:
>After all, it makes no sense to have 5 guards on the floor for 48 minutes...
>Neil

usually true, but i think 5 Magic Johnsons on the floor at the same time
would've been awesome.  better than 5 Larry Birds, who i think would have
been very tough as well.  i'm talking about against NBA teams, not other
hypothetical concoctions of some great player.  what about 5 Michael Jordans?
from the particular vantage point i have here, i cant see any other xeroxed
player faring well against real nba teams - in their prime.  not even Oscar.

- nate
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: Re: Most Improved Player
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: Project EOS - North Carolina State University
Distribution: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 09:39:03 GMT

--
   How about Hornacek (sp?) of the Suns, he has improved so much.
Another candidate could be Kendall Gill of the Hornets.

Just Musing....

delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu
"Greatness comes to those who wish to become Engineers..."

-----------------------------------------------------------------
   N      N    CCCCC     SSSSS     U     U
  N N    N    C     C   S     S   U     U   100 Years of Football
 N   N  N    C           SSSS    U     U    and 9-3 in 1991!  
 N    N N   C     C    S     S   U    U
N      N     CCCCC      SSSSS     UUUU
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: tamada@cheshire.oxy.edu (Michael K. Tamada)
Subject: Re: BOXSCORE sea 96, san 101   22mar92
Organization: Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA  90041
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 04:12:12 GMT

In article <4085@sumax.seattleu.edu> davidy@sumax.seattleu.edu (Stimpson J. Cat) writes:
>In article <ddrumm.21ff@amiganet.chi.il.us> ddrumm@amiganet.chi.il.us (Daniel Drumm) writes:
>>David L. Yee:
>> 
>>If the Eddie Johnson statement isn't self-evident then I really don't want to
>>bother explaining it.
>
>	Well, it isn't self evident to me (why a team is in trouble if
>Eddie Johnson is leading it in scoring.) Here is why:

   [Decription of Eddie Johnson and his role with the Sonics deleted]

>I hope someone with a better grasp of the obvious
>can tell what I'm  missing here.

     The most likely explanation is that Daniel Drumm has got EJ confused
with someone like World B. Free or Orlando Woolridge or Freeman Williams:
a team with one of those guys as its leading scorer would indeed be a weak
team.  EJ is not in those guys' class -- he's more like a Ricky Pierce or
a Fred Brown or a Dominique Wilkins -- you WANT guys like that to be
your leading scorer.
     Better still of course is to have someone like Michael Jordan,
Hakeem Olajuwon, or David Robinson as your leading scorer.  But none of
those guys play for the Sonics, and Pierce and Johnson do, and the
Sonics are doing quite fine thank you with RP and EJ leading their scoring,
So David Yee is correct in saying that the Sonic shouldn't be shouldering
their way to the lottery machine.  They're not going to win the championship,
but there are a lot more teams looking up at the Sonics than looking down
on them (17 teams have worse records than the Supes, 9 have better records
this year).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |__	      o
  | W			   Mike Tamada
		  |\	   Institutional Research Office
		   \O	   Occidental College
		    |      tamada@oxy.edu
		   /|
		  | |
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Oh that Larry Bird
Date: 9 Apr 92 22:21:41 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Apr9.193110.14648@ll.mit.edu> nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith) writes:
>i think at the time
>the scouts new much more about bird than earvin and it is possible that the
>lakers would have gone with bird....and if they did, they may have still won
>5 or so titles.  the celts, however, in 78, would've gone with Who? Corzine?
>acckkk.  
Let's see, the Lakers had a decent forward in Jamaal. This is how the
lineup would look like:

Jamaal, Bird, Kareem, Nixon, Cooper.

Replace Jamaal by Worthy and Nixon by Scott later.

Is this a 5-championship squad? Well, they might have won in 80, 81 and
82 (the 83 76ers would be too strong), but after the departure of Nixon, 
I can't see how they could have won anymore with a backcourt of Scott and 
Cooper. Cooper as the starting QB? Gimme a break. It's just like putting 
Steve Young in Montana's place, adding an Eric Dickerson, the 49ers would 
still have won 4 championships.

What if they hadn't traded Nixon? Then we don't know.

>and the JBCarroll fiasco trade may not have happened either...so if
>you're a laker fan looking at the Big Picture, it may have hurt Boston worse
>than any slight harm to the laker chances.  then you might see the Big Score
>be 11-13 instead of 11-16.  who knows.  
Bravo!!!

>i think magic then would go to some other team (not boston-  who had #2?) 
Chicago. Then they would have been in the finals at least 10 years earlier.
They probably wouldn't have had the chance to draft Jordan in 1984.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
From: klund@mulato.gac.edu (Kevin T Lund)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: KJ/Hardaway?
Date: 9 Apr 92 16:09:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr9.100906.734

Anybody know why KJ and Hardaway didn't play on Monday night and when  
they'll be back?  They're my starting backcourt in my fantasy league, and  
it's the playoffs, and without them...

Thanks

Kevin L.
From: ec120wee@sdcc4.ucsd.edu (Anthony Minkoff)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: BOXSCORE den78lac78.11apr92 (lac 122-88)
Date: 13 Apr 92 08:51:17 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

den 88, lac 122   11apr92

MISSING offensive rebounds
Clippers' most lop-sided win ever

den (23-55)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
liberty,marcus    32    7  14   2  2   3  3   -  8   0   3  0  1  0  0  0   19
williams,reggie   37    6  14   1  4   5  7   -  4   5   3  0  3  0  0  0   18
anderson,cadillac 22    3  10   0  0   1  1   -  6   0   3  0  1  1  0  0    7
macon,mark        27    4  13   0  0   2  2   -  1   5   4  3  1  0  0  0   10
jackson,chris     30    3  11   1  4   0  0   -  4   3   0  2  4  0  0  0    7
wolf,joe          24    2   8   0  0   1  2   -  2   3   3  0  2  0  0  0    5
lichti,todd       24    4   6   0  0   1  1   -  1   2   0  2  4  0  1  0    9
brooks,kevin      21    3   6   0  0   3  4   -  6   1   2  0  3  0  0  0    9
hastings,scott    15    1   2   0  0   0  0   -  2   1   2  0  0  1  1  0    2
davis,walter       5    1   1   0  0   0  0   -  1   0   0  0  1  0  0  0    2
scheffler,steve    3    0   0   0  0   0  0   0  0   0   1  0  0  0  0  0    0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
den totals       240   34  85   4 10  16 20   0 35  20  21  7 20  2  2  0   88
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .400   .400   .800       team rebs  6, team TO's 3

lac (44-34)      min  fgm fga  3m 3a ftm fta or tr  as  pf st to bk tc ej  pts
norman,ken        26    6   9   0  0   8 13   - 12   3   2  1  3  0  0  0   20
manning,danny     29    4   8   0  0   2  2   -  2   7   4  4  2  1  0  0   10
smith,charles     30   10  10   0  0   9 10   -  7   1   4  0  2  7  0  0   29
harper,ron        28    7  12   1  1   3  7   -  4   3   0  2  3  0  0  0   18
grant,gary        30    2   3   0  0   0  0   -  1  13   3  2  3  0  0  0    4
rivers,doc        23    3   5   0  0   2  2   -  3   4   2  2  1  0  0  0    8
young,danny       23    2   4   1  2   0  0   -  1   4   0  3  1  0  0  0    5
edwards,james      8    2   3   0  0   0  0   -  2   1   1  1  1  0  0  0    4
vaught,loy        15    4   7   0  0   0  0   -  4   0   1  0  0  1  0  0    8
polynice,olden    12    3  10   0  0   0  2   -  7   0   2  1  1  0  0  0    6
kimble,bo         10    2   4   0  0   0  0   0  0   2   1  0  1  0  0  0    4
ellis,leron        6    3   3   0  0   0  0   -  1   0   0  0  1  1  0  0    6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lac totals       240   48  78   2  3  24 36   0 44  38  20 16 19 10  0  0  122
FG, 3P, FT averages:     .615   .667   .667       team rebs 12

den   22  19  28  19  -   88
lac   35  32  22  33  -  122

attendance 15800, time 2:03, officials: SJavie,DBavetta,BSaar
-- 
Tony Minkoff
aminkoff@sdcc13.ucsd.edu
ec120wee@sdcc4.ucsd.edu
From: hanley@fyi.crd.ge.com (Christopher W Hanley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Home Court for Det-Bos????
Date: 13 Apr 92 14:46:04 GMT
Reply-To: hanley@fyi.crd.ge.com (Christopher W Hanley)
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center


 
|>>
|>Boston gets the home court advantage because they've already won the 
|>season series with Detroit, with one game left to play between the two 
|>teams (I don't believe the Pistons have beaten the Celts this season).
|>
|>On another note, wouldn't it be ironic if the Celts overtook NY in the 
|>Atlantic for that coveted #2 seed, only to find Indiana had slipped to the 
|>7th spot?

Cleveland has already cinched up the #2 spot, but the possibility still exists
for Boston to play Indiana, ie if Boston overtakes NY (more than likely)
and Indiana holds off New Jersey (less than likely) this would make for 
a #3 vs #6 matchup - reminiscent of last year's playoffs

Chris Hanley
Die Hard 76ers fan: Shaq and Barkley in 92'
hanley@crd.ge.com
From: se3@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Stanley Eng)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Cadillac Anderson
Date: 17 Apr 92 01:01:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: cunixf.1992Apr17.010134.30596
Reply-To: se3@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Stanley Eng)
Organization: Columbia University


Does anybody know the origin of the nickname of Denver power forward/center 
Greg "Cadillac" Anderson?



Stanley Eng      se3@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro