HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mark@totaltec.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles lose: Where were the safeties?
Date: 12 Oct 92 14:11:16 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Total Tec Systems, Inc.

In article <1ba2kfINNkgl@aludra.usc.edu>, tehyang@aludra.usc.edu (Teh Kao Yang) writes:
> In article <douthit.718834370@scofflaw> douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit) writes:
>>We will see you in Texas in a couple weeks.
>>
>>>                                EAGLES 27
>>>                                K.C.   10
>>
>>
>>K.C. just beat your beloved Eagles.  So much for your ranting predictions
>>and your 16-0 season.  We will beat you in Texas just like last year.
> 
> What happened to the Eagles secondary? I've never seen wider receivers get
> THAT wide open!! Was is Izel "Toast" Jenkin's fault? Did Eric Allen play?
> 
> -Tehkao
The first 43-yard TD, Izel Jenkins bit on a play fake and then couldn't
get back quick enough and bang, easy-td. The second td was blown coverage.
I'm not sure if it was Allen's fault or Hopkins fault. There were 2 receivers
on the left were Allen and Booty were. Booty went on a safety blitz, and
Allen picked up the receiver coming across the middle. No one covered the
other receiver who went into the end zone untouched with the nearest
defender 15-20 yards away. The third TD was another play action fake. The
corner they put in to replace Jenkins, #30 not sure who he is, was covering
the reciever on the right. KC ran a play fake, both #30 and Hopkins stopped
and the reciever went untouched for another TD. Overall a pretty terrible
game for the Eagles. Not only did there secondary break down, but there special
teams were terrible too. Two blocked FG attempts, two terrible kicks by
Ruzek that got KC near mid field. Ron Heller, LG had a terrible game to.
Derrick Thomas had him for lunch. Don't know why Kotite didn't keep a RB back
to help caus god knowns he needed it. 

Ben Smith...where are you???

Mark Remeta
GO EAGLES!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rscott@ra.csc.ti.com (Roderick Scott)
Subject: Two Different Games Eagles/Cowboys
Organization: Texas Instruments
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 20:14:56 GMT

It's Amazing How Fans For The Cowboys, And Fans For The Eagles Saw Two
Games In One...

Cowboys Fans States:
They Beat Themselves ...

Eagles Fans States:
It Was The Defense That Caused Them To Be Themselves..

Let's Hear From Some Non-Cowboys/Eagles Fans On Which Game They Saw..

This Should Settle The Argument.... 
-- 
Roderick Scott|This Line Intentionally Left Blank|Texas Instruments
rscott@ti.com |				         |Fax (214) 995-0403

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: keithg@boi.hp.com (Keith Glasson)
Subject: prediction for Paul
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 10:14:33 GMT
Organization: work
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]


	Okay Paul, just for you, I predict the Raiders will
	win a close game in Seattle this Sunday. They're going to
	light up the scoreboard, and be ahead by, oh, 2-3 points
	at the half, and hang on for a win.

	-Keith
From: scsd1055@altair.selu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Shortest player?
Date: 13 Oct 92 02:01:47 -0600
Organization: Southeastern Louisiana University

>In article <BvMutF.9st@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> bubba@mace.cc.purdue.edu writes:
>
>Who is the current Shortest Man in the NFL?  

	I think it's Atlanta's T. Lewis.  5'7", 135lb...  but I may be
wrong.  Maybe an Atlanta fan can help us out with a little (pardon the pun)
info on the guy.

	Also, are there any other Saints fans out there, besides myself, that
are getting sick and tired of our offensive offense?  I mean, an average of
12 points per game from the offense isn't going to cut it against the Bills,
Dolphins, and Redskins....  Oh well, just thought I'd get that out of my
system.... night all!


Bill P.
From: centry@athena.mit.edu (Jae H Nam)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: EAGLES REAl TEST coming up, KC, Skins, 'Boys on the road
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:49:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: athena.1992Oct9.154953.13165
Distribution: usa
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In article <Oct.8.16.19.27.1992.4802@andromeda.rutgers.edu>, 
dowzycki@andromeda.rutgers.edu (Ken Dowzycki) writes:

>   Although I am a big Eagles fan let's not forget how Phoenix has come
>to the vet for the last 2 years in a row and beat the Eagles.  These are
>the games that the Eagles should have won.  Tampa Bay last year was another
>one.   THIS EAGLE FAN takes one week at a time!  Just my $.02.

I agree.

I only take one game at a tie also.  A win vs. Pheonix counts just
as much as a win vs. Washington (well, alright. in case of tie
breakers and what not, it doesn't but record-wise, it's the same).

If the Eagles are a Superbowl bound team, they should not lose easy
games.  The tough games (Dallas, SF, Wash, KC) reveal the quality of
the team, but the easy games (Pheonix, Seattle) are just as revealing.

A GREAT team does not lose to the Tampa Bay's and the Pheonix's of the
world.  If the Eagles are for REAL, they should stomp 'em.  Last year
they didn't, and we know the results....

This year, we better crush 'em, or else we're just pretenders and not
true contenders.  So in a way, even the easy games are a test of a
team's true caliber.

Whatever....
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Ferrell Edmunds (Dolphins)
Date: 14 Oct 92 14:32:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: uvmark.1992Oct14.143254.36501
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.

In article <81608@ut-emx.uucp> jamestyu@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu () writes:
>About keeping Edmunds, it'd be nice in an ideal world, but it's doubtful
>that a team can keep 2 high quality TE's especially in Miami's pass
>offense.  Besides, at the moment, he's a highly marketable commodity and
>Miami could pick up some needed defensive help.
>
>PS: Miami won't go 16-0, but could very easily be 13-3 and with the
>Buff's latest loss, win the division easily...
>

I know that the Saints are looking for more offensive weapons.  I think
Ferrell would fit into their type of offense very effectively.  And, they
seem to have a lot of very talented defensive people.  How about a trade
going that route???

-- 
David T. Meeks                    ||" We are jigsaw pieces, aligned on the 
VMark Software, Inc.              ||  perimeter edge, 
uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  interlocked through a missing piece"
davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||" ...This world is totally Fugazi"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene@Yale.EDU (Adriene Nazaretian - GO GIANTS)
Subject: We ARE Part of the team (was Re: HAIL THE BROWNS)
Organization: Yale University
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 18:42:56 GMT

In article <1992Oct14.180815.23889@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> jeffr@ssec.
wisc.edu (Jeff Ramin) writes:>From: jeffr@ssec.wisc.edu (Jeff Ramin)
>Subject: Re: HAIL THE BROWNS
>Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 18:08:15 GMT

>In article <dn2001-131092152526@m248-103.bgsu.edu>, dn2001@andy.bgsu.edu (Dan Nolan) writes:
>|> THE BROWNS RULE!!!!!!!!!!
>|> 
>|> THAT'S ALL AND NOTHING ELSE.
>|> 
>|> GREENBAY DOESN'T STAND A CHANCE AGAINST US.
>                                           ^^

>Are you a member of the team?  There's very few things more annoying than fans
>using the term "us" instead of "them".  Occasionally, I'll even hear a very
>poor broadcaster doing this.

Sorry I completely disagree.  Yes you ARE a member of the team, when you are 
a fan.  I always use "WE" when talking about "MY" NY Giants team.  

Good fans should consider themselves part of the team. I guess you just 
arent in that catagory.  You are probably just a bandwagon hopper, a fair 
weather fan who comes around when YOUR team is doing well.

We help psych the team up, we are there for them, as much as they are 
for us.

Broadcasters are another story, because they are supposed to be impartial.
Adriene L. Nazaretian            G         Nazaretian-Adriene@Yale.Edu
Sr Technical Specialist       G  I         Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.CIS.YALE.EDU
Computing and Info Systems    O  A         Adriene@YALEADS.BITNET
Yale University                  N         Adriene@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU
175 Whitney Avenue               T         Voice (203) 432-6683
New Haven, CT. 06520             S         FAX  (203) 432-6165
From: jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dallas was beaten by bad luck, not the eagles!
Date: 7 Oct 92 17:09:25 GMT
Article-I.D.: cbnewsm.1992Oct7.170925.7690
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <6OCT199223190496@rigel.tamu.edu>, c1h3384@rigel.tamu.edu writes:
> Brian, that game was the one that COULD go one way or the other, especially
> in the first half. Dallas was moving the ball at ease, and the kick return
> should, SHOULD, go all the way to give dallas a 14-10 lead. 

If Dallas was moving thet ball with ease, as you claim, why didn't they
take the excellent field position that kick return gave them and stick
it in the endzone for a 14-10 lead?  Or at the very least get a FG out
of it and a 10-10 tie?  Or better yet, SHOULD the refs have seen the
fumble on Dallas' second possession, the Eagles COULD have had the ball
first-and-ten on the Cowboys' 15.  Then the Eagles WOULD have jumped out
to a 14-0 lead and the game WOULD have been over with ten minutes to play
in the first quarter.

> Again, it was bad luck, NOT the eagles, who beat the Cowboys. Believe it or
> not, let us see what happens when the Eagles come to twon in November. Dallas
> will eat them live, LIVE!

What the hell do you know about "bad luck?"

"Bad luck" is losing the rights to your All-Pro TE because some judge in
the middle of nowhere decides the way the NFL has been doing things for
the past decade is illegal.  "Bad luck" is losing your starting CB for a
season due to a freak knee injury on natural grass.  "Bad luck" is losing
your All-World defensive lineman for an eternity so he can be part of the
All-Heaven team.  That's "bad luck".

"Bad luck" isn't throwing three interceptions against the NFL's #1 ranked
defense when you are forced to throw the football because your rushing
attack was completely shutdown.  That's "terrible execution" and "superior
play" on the other side of the football.

The Eagles beat the Cowboys on both sides of the ball.  It wasn't even
close.  Anybody that says otherwise is either an optomistic Cowboys fan
or knows nothing about football.

The rematch at Dallas is another story, but I'll leave that to you
Cowboys fans to discuss for now.  We Eagles fans have more important games
to look forward to.


E-A-G-L-E-S

Joe Dakes
AT&T Microelectronics
555 Union Boulevard
Allentown, PA  18103
alux2!jmd
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: martens@python.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens)
Subject: Re: Status of Packers' Darrell Thompson?
Organization: Ohio State U. Dept. of Computer Science
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 20:34:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.191338.3374@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:

>Anybody know if Darrell Thompson has officially been activated?  I've 
>read that he's practicing but I'm unsure whether or not that means he 
>can't be on IR anymore.

I think he was activated on Wednesday.  From the 10/8 Packer Plus,
p. 18: "The Packers didn't have to cut one of their fullbacks to
activate Thompson on Wednesday, since they had an open roster spot
after waiving cornerback Lewis Billups.  Even with Billups gone,
the Packers still have four cornerbacks on their roster."
-- 
	Don't waste your time waving your hands
	and hoping when a rock or a club will do.

-- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: reams@crchh462.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Cary Reams)
Subject: Bates, cont
Followup-To: reams@bnr.ca
Reply-To: reams@bnr.ca
Organization: NT/BNR
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 12:45:21 GMT


Okay. Bates is credited with saying he vowed to return in 1993.

Source:
Dallas Morning News.

-- 
Cary W Reams | "...truth demands to be declared, even if it is
NT/BNR/MTXVO | ugly and unethical."                - Nietzsche 
---------------------------------------------------------------
My opinions are not necessarily shared by Northern Telecom/BNR. 
---------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: drhall1@pbhya.PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall)
Subject: Re: BEWARE PHILLY FANS! WATCH THE TRASH TALKING..
Reply-To: drhall1@PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 14:24:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct16.042711.10808@ncsu.edu> delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE) writes:
>
>
>
>  ALLRIGHT, YOU RENEGADE PHILLY FANS!!!!!!!
>
>  TRUST ME, I AM A BUFFALO BILLS FAN, AND YOU CANNOT GO SAYING RIDICULOUS
>  NOTIONS LIKE 15-1 AND VICTORY. I TALKED MY TRASH EARLY, AND GOT UPENDED.
>
>  PHILLY WILL FALL AGAIN, SO BE PREPARED TO FACE THE HEAT!!
>
>  JUST A FRIENDLY WARNING FROM A NOT-SO-FRIENDLY CHIEFS AND BILLS BACKER!!!
>
>
>  (I LOVE WRITING IN CAPS--I AM TOO LAZY TO USE THE SHIFT!! :)
>
>  I can't stand:        I wholly support:
>
>  Raiders               Bills
>  Redskins              Chiefs
>  Cowboys               Eagles
>  Giants                Packers
>  49ers                 Steelers
>  Miami               
>  Cincinnati (because of a little Monday Night James Lofton kicking last year..)
>
>  
>  
>-- 
>delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu
>
>
>      
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
>   BBB   U  U  FFFF  FFFF  AAA   L   OOO     BBB    I  L     L   SSS     !
>  B   B U  U  F     F     A  A  L   O   O   B   B  I  L     L   S   S   !
> BBBBB U  U  FFFF  FFFF  AAAA  L   O   O   BBBBB  I  L     L     SS    !
>B   B U  U  F     F     A  A  L   O   O   B   B  I  L     L    S   S  
> BBB   UU  F     F     A  A  LLLL  OOO     BBB  I  LLLL  LLLL   SSS  !
>
>Raiders Fans: Prepare to Lose!

What is this still doing in your sig? I spent the entire pre-season reading
this in your sig and looking forward to the Raiders beating the Bills just so
I wouldn't have to read this.

If you are refering to the Chiefs that you also support, you are still talking
trash. They still have to play each other once more.

A Raider fan
>
>Reporter: "Who do you think is the best running back in the NFL?"
>Thurman Thomas: "The running back that went to Oklahoma State".
From: cyf@sequent.com (Cyrus Foughty)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Browns' Vardell
Date: 8 Oct 92 21:56:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: sequent.1992Oct8.215621.16966
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc.

Rookie Vardell could be the Jim Brown of the 90's.  This is a
statement that I've heard several times.  I've haven't seen him enough
to decide for myself;  how about some input.  Also is he hurt and is
he playing this week?

What is the state of the running corp for Cleveland?

Cy
Organization: Senior, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 13:33:12 -0400 
From: Amit Likhyani <al1x+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: words to Hail to the Redskins

Could someone please send me the words to the Redskins theme song.  I
would be much obliged.

Mit
From: chf0@roger.gte.com (Curtis Fennell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: EAGLES WILL GO 15-1 AND WIN THE SUPERBOWL AND KILL THE REDGIRLS
Date: 15 Oct 92 18:12:52 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: GTE Laboratories

In article <1992Oct15.151214.1249@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> aperkins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Aaron B. Perkins) writes:
>
>OK OK OK MY MIGHTY EAGLES LOST TO THE DUDLY CHEFS (THEY COOKED A MEAN
>LONGBALL) 
>IF MY EAGLES SECONDARY HAD NOT FALLEN ASLEEP THE EAGLES WOULD NOT HAVE LOST
>TO THE CHEFS AND THATS FOR SURE......!!!!!!!
>
>FOR THE NEXT EASY PREDICTION GAME WE PIT THE REDSHITS VS. EAGLES THIS IS THE
>WAY I SEE IT (I MESSED UP THE LAST PREDICTION SO HERES THE NEXT
>CORRECT ONE!!
>
>[much capitalized stuff deleted]
>signed                     JULIUS THE LEGENDARY PREDICTOR

Could it be?  Is it possible??? My God, but it IS!!!  It's the MAD
DOLFAN'S evil twin JULIUS!!!

;^)
Curt
--
Curt "I always pick the Dolphins - even against Buffalo!"  Fennell
			DOLFAN in New England.             
'72 Dolphins - The perfect team in the perfect season - 17-0
From: austin@cs.widener.edu (Jeff Austin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Hats off to the Chiefs...
Date: 11 Oct 1992 16:00:29 -0400
Organization: Widener University CS Department, Chester PA
NNTP-Posting-Host: shirley.cs.widener.edu

Well,

	Since I'm usually the first to say "In your Face" when the Eagles 
	kick ass, I guess it's only fair to give credit where credit is
	due.  Great Job, KC!  Marty really put together a great game plan.
	I think he really caught Philly by surprise.  The Chief's excellent
	usage of the passing game proved to exploit some real holes in the
	Eagle's defense - they caught the birds sleeping a few times.  Even
	though the Eagles were playing some good "catch up" late in the game,
	KC had it won all the way.  So, you won't hear any excuses from me,
	the birds just got outplayed.  

					Jeff

P.S.	So we don't go 16-0.  15-1 ain't that bad!  Go E-A-G-L-E-S   !!!
-- 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jeff Austin - Widener University, Chester PA | The Computer Rule of Thumb: |
|         austin@tattoo.cs.widener.edu         |  "When in doubt, reboot!"   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
From: cwilliam@dunned.socal.com (Chris Williams)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Wild cards
Date: 16 Oct 92 18:13:15 GMT
Organization: Dunn-Edwards Corp. - Los Angeles, CA

In article <Bw3KHM.Ix8@mail.boi.hp.com> keithg@boi.hp.com (Keith Glasson) writes:
>
>
>	What do the netfans think of wild card teams? For 'em?
>	Do these 8-8 and 9-7 teams deserve to go to the playoffs?
>	Since we're stuck with them-all that t.v. revenue-wouldn't
>	it be more reasonable to hand them out based solely on
>	won/loss records, with no regard to conference?
>
>	-Keith
>
>++++++++++++++++++
>


Also consider the interconference divisional matches. For example, the Raiders
have to play the Cowboys, Eagles and 'skins because the AFC West drew the
NFC East this year. (Add Buffalo and Miami for one of the toughest schedules
this year. If the Raiders go 9-7 with this schedule after dropping the first
4, they definitely deserve to go.

-Chris
-- 
        							      ______                                                                        ,~~,~~, \
	                                                           / )))  /  \   ______________________________________________________________    ` ~^   \ _|
/ "A squid eating dough in a poly ethylene bag is fast and     \  ()^()---|/@)  \  bulbous. Got me?" - Capt. Beefheart                    ___  /   /_       )'
 \______________________________________________________/    \_\__ |__,   / |                                                                  `-'  \___,  / \  	Chris Williams		chris@dunned.socal.com                        \`
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullivan)
Subject: Niners escape Foxboro
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 23:30:01 GMT

Whew!

The Niners were everything I expected them to be - FLAT to put it
mildly.  The Patriots did some good things and were in a position
to win the game, but thank goodness Watters made the plays on
offense, the O line did the job, and the D took advantage of an
inexperienced desperate QB (I admire Millen's ability to stand in
the pocket after the beating he's taken this year.)

These are the kind of games the Niners have to win.  If they had one
one out of six of these last year, (forget it, nevermind,ifififififif)

Pats fans:  who was player that was taken out on stretcher? what is
his current condition?

I was trying to remember why I had such a bad feeling about this
game (beyond the possibility of a big upset) and it occurred to me
when the Patriot player went down that it was against the Pats in
'89 that Jeff Fuller's career ended.  Didn't he run into Stevens?

More on D line play:

They weren't any better than last week.  What I noticed is that
Fagan was in the game only on half the plays at best. I don't think
it's a situation substitution, but trying to keep his fragile knees
from fatiguing.  He draws double every time.

Some positives:
Besides winning the game which was no easy feat, it was good to see
sure tackling by the secondary and 'backers.

Dana Hall picked one, that'll help his confidence.  Whitmore is
making mistakes, but they are physical mistakes - too much contact
on the pass defense...  I can live with those penalties.  He hits
hard. Corners did good job.

On refs:
yes, they missed one when Ron Lewis was interfered with on punt -
that's a judgement call- there was a Niner blocker right there.
they made some great but tough calls around the end zone with the
Pats possession.  One was the apparent TD that they spotted on the
1.  The other was the apparent out of bounds that was called a TD.
Both were the right call.

I was screaming at my TV about the Young run 'out of bounds' at the
end of the first half but replay showed refs were right again.

The holding call against the Pats on the 1 was unforgiveable.  How
can they make that effing call?  It is a wrestling match on every
short yardage play - how do they decide when to make the call?  I
am a Niner fan and I thought that was awful.

Hang in there Pats fans, you'll have your upset.  When do you play
the Dolphins?

Mike


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand)
Subject: Best postseason QB performance (was Re: Best Performance)
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 05:15:18 GMT

...isn't Joe Montana's!

Lookie here (minimum 100 attempts, top 5 all-time)

Name           Games Atts  Comp   Cmp%  Yards  AvgGn  TDs TD %  INT  IN% RATE
-------------- ----- ----  ----  -----  -----  -----  --- ----  --- ---- -----
Bart Starr       10   213   130   61.0   1753   8.23   15  7.0    3  1.4 104.8
Joe Montana      19   593   375   63.2   4758   8.02   39  6.6   17  2.9  98.2
Ken Anderson      6   166   110   66.3   1321   7.96    9  5.4    6  3.6  93.5
Joe Theismann    10   211   128   60.7   1782   8.45   11  5.2    7  3.3  91.4
Ken Stabler      13   351   203   57.8   2641   7.52   19  5.4   13  3.7  84.2

Just for fun, folx.

--
Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Hail to the Redskins
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:21:15 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.135802.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>             I think Coach Gibbs was showing some class. Besides, if the
>two teams play against each other in the near future that would be just
>what the broncos need to get fired up.

The two teams will only play against each other in the near future in
Pasadena.

Well, you mean scores of 39-22, 42-10, and 55-10 would not have already 
fired up the Broncos in that potential game in Pasadena? Boy, if Reeves and
Elway need a rub-it-in TD in a regular season game to fire up their troops, 
they don't belong.

Based on the Broncos' weak showing against quality teams away from Mile
High, they don't belong anyway.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro