HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: michael@albert.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: seconding the motion....
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:55:00 GMT
	<17322@borg.cs.unc.edu> <1992Nov8.180633.23395@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>
Organization: Boston University
In-reply-to: rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu's message of 8 Nov 92 18:06:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov8.180633.23395@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
   In article <17322@borg.cs.unc.edu> saxe@monet.cs.unc.edu (Eddie Saxe) writes:
   >In article <6VoTTB6w165w@monsoon.com> sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta) writes:
   >>michael@albert.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin) writes:
   >>
   >>
You will notice that Robert Davis has conveniently left out what I
typed here about a "big-tent policy" including ALL stupid politicians
regardless of party affiliation, making it look as if I suggested
otherwise. He then goes on to poke fun at "liberal politicians",
something which I don't mind, of course. But in light of the fact that
he had to delete my post in order to do so, I can only wonder, what
his actual stance on censorship is. In another part of this thread, he
claims, that for all the left talks about being censored, it often is
just as quick to censor the right. Well, DUH! It doesn't make it
correct for either to do it though.

Obviously, Robert Davis shall only
censor when it suits the purpose of trying to raise the hackles of
members of this group. What he doesn't realize, is that not everybody
here is, as he would call it, a "flaming liberal commie", or some
such. There are those of us here who are conservative in one way or
another and DO FEEL WE DESERVE MUCH BETTER THAN WHAT THE REPUBLICAN
PARTY HAS BEEN GIVING US. If anything, I would say that this group has
been for me a non-partisan attack on the stupidities inside the
federal government. As the Republicans have been in control of the
Executive branch for 12 years, much of the stupidity to be taken note
of will issue from them. It took years for the Democratic Party to
remarginalize its extremes in order to work with the center- this same
year, the Republicans stupidly catered to its extremes.

What has this got to do with Quayle, you might ask? Simple.
Bush's nomination of Quayle as his V.P. was a ploy to party
extremists. Regardless, it would be nice to have intelligent 
people working in the position- Do remember Baker's opening line,
"not my choice."  As long as there are stupid politicians, there will
be newsgroups to harrass them.

A final note to Robert Davis: If you're really into the sport of
spotting stupid politicians then get to it! If you're here just to
engage in "liberal baiting", then go away. Both parties need you then
as they'd need a blood-bloated tick on a festering sore.

We need light, not heat, here.

Chaplin.
P.S. Yeah, my ancestors came off of the Mayflower, so I should give a
shit? What counts is the FUTURE!

--
=========================================================================
Michael A. Chaplin           If you want *their* opinions, ask *them*.
michael@albert.bu.edu ....The Einstein Papers Project, Boston, Mass., USA
chaplin@husc.harvard.edu ....Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., USA
From: popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bush eats it!
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 03:59:03 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX

twarner@hardy.u.washington.edu (Tom Warner) writes:

> >>>and grand juries for the next two years.  I hope he ends up in the same 
> >>>cell as Jimmy Bakker.  Or Lyndon La Rouche.
> >>>HE"S GONE!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
> >>
> >>Just so long as you're taking it well.
> 
> Hey, was it just urban legend, or were Baker and La Rouche actually cell
> mates at one point?
> 
> If so, I think someone needs to write a play. Throwing Bush in would be
> great too. Kind of like Down By Law. :)


YES! They wre for brief time Cell Mates!  (I don't know if they actually 
played drop the soap.)  4 or 5 weeks ago there was a Lyndon La Rouche TV 
infomercial down here in Houston.  Vintage La Rouche, ecxept his Voice 
Overs were obviously telephoned in to the recording studio from his 
prison cell over a cheap phone.  Lots of "I told you Sos" from Lyndon 
about the economy.  And replays from old La rouche TV ads to hammer that 
point home.  The first half of the ad actually made sense.  Then it began 
it's ineviatble slide into foamy mouthed incoherence and conspiracy 
think. Sort of like a Robert Davis post.  Vintage La Rouche.  It was a 
laugh riot as most of his TV things are. I miss the local La Rouchites 
that used to run for every office evry election season down here.  They 
were always such wonderful comic relief.
 To bad you people in oher cities never got to witness the mad rantings 
of local La Rouchite Susan Director.  She was twice as silly as Lyndon 
and three times as Vehement! A truely funny sight to see her on local TV.
Truely a rabid woman. 

--
popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX, (713) 943-2728
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
From: alizard@Blue.Kludge.COM (A.Lizard)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: SAM.ZIP
Date: 4 Nov 92 09:47:22 GMT
Organization: 'Lectrick Blue!, Moraga CA

It's available from compuserve and america-on-line, it's about a quarter
meg, and it's a US budget simulator... you can play the balance the
budget game yourself... if's freeware... 

A.Lizard

--------------------------------------------------------------------
A.Lizard Internet Addresses:
alizard%tweekco%boo@PacBell.COM        (preferred)
[path]!pacbell.COM!boo!tweekco!alizard (bang path for above)
alizard@seer.mystic.com (backup)   alizard@Blue.Kludge.com (backup)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: awells@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Andrew V. Wells)
Subject: Re: Yes Yes Yes Yes
Summary: ignore
Organization: Northeastern University
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 20:55:52 GMT

In article <1d9b1fINNhfn@eagle.natinst.com>, bobc@natinst.com (Bob Conyne) writes:
> In article <1992Nov4.192348.11246@cas.org> esp51@cas.org () writes:
> >Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Billy Graham, and all the other Fundamentalist
> >Nazi hate mongers.  The weasels are back in their cages!
> 
 This element is going to disappear merely because Bush lost. The 'religious'
right is alive and well and as well-heeled as ever.  Believe me their
attacks on civil rights and common sense will be as dangerous as
ever.  Having a Democrat at 1600 Penn. Ave won't change that.

> Wait a minute.  Billy Graham does not deserve this criticism.  While I am

     Billy Graham was the one who annointed the bombs dropped
in the Gulf 'war' and prayed with Bush for 'victory' and all that
insane sh**.  Graham is merely more 'respectable' within the
mainstream.


> remain bitter enemies.  I saw a Falwell fund-raising drive on TV several years
> ago and he railed on BG relentlessly.  That alone ought to elevate BG out of 
> the toilet that the others swim in.
> 
Does that really make Graham any better? They just don't like each
other.
From: KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: If Marilyn has only one life to live...
Date: 12 Nov 92 06:12:45 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.154503.26592@gvl.unisys.com>, train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com
(Herbert Rutledge) says:

>  You don't need to be Sigmund Freud to discover her motivation.  Did
>  you pay attention to her speech at the Republican convention in Houston?
>  The one where she attacked the very existence of women who managed to
>  juggle a career and family?  Look at her targets:  Hillary Clinton, Tipper

Did -you- pay attention?  She said no such thing!  I have no idea how you could
possibly twist what she said into an 'attack' on working mothers....!

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: M19249@mwvm.mitre.org
Subject: Re: Thanks for the memories...Transition Plan
Organization: The MITRE Corporation, McLean VA 22102
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 17:42:13 GMT

In article <Bx7IAx.9Hu@ais.org>
spencer@ais.org (Spencer PriceNash) writes:
>In article <VLZPTB2w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.
la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>>I just wanted to say 'thanks' to everyone for making this such a fun group to
>>read. [...]
>>
>>Now that Our Boy has been removed from his place of prominence officially, I'
>>like to propose that, in true Washingtonian style, we form our own transition
>>team for this newsgroup.  Just as the Real World changes from one
>>administration to another, we should lay a.f.d-q to rest while still continui
>>its spirit.
>
>I see your point, and agree pretty much.  I would feel a twinge of
>sadness if a.f.d-q were rmgrouped, but it might be best to do so before
>it became boring and repetitive.  It sure has been fun, though.  There
>have been so many postings in the humorous and silly vein (as opposed
>to the serious vein) that this newsgroup has been one of the ones I
>ALWAYS looked forward to reading.
>
>We still have a few months with Dano in office, which means a few more
>months of fun.  There will probably also be a few newbies who think
>we're picking on the Dannster unfairly, some serious political
>discussion, a few flame wars...you know.
>
I, for one, am not underestimating the ability of the lame-Quayle to give us
more "bons mots" before he goes off to round out Gerry Ford's golf foursome at
celebrity golf tournaments.  Neverless, I think we should seriously consider
transitioning to an alt.politics.humor group.  If the last 12 years have taught
us anything it should be whether it is the P or VP funny stuff happens.
Political humor will be with us forever.  Whether it be bravado, incompetence,
peccadillo or other weakness, politics can be very funny stuff.  I grew up
watching Johnny Carson prove this on most nights.  My fellow netters, we have
a place, a role, nay, even a duty to place tongues firmly in cheek and carry on
about the politicians who are "carrying on".  Why not a new alt.politics.humor
with a lot of a.f.dq cross posts until a.f.dq meets its end?
-DW
"standard disclaimer"
 
 I wonder how the Dan Quayle Quarterly is doing?  Have they decided
>what to do with the magazine?  Maybe a.f.d-q should follow their lead.
>Or, maybe they'll follow ours!
>
>>|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
>>|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
>--
>Spencer PriceNash   spencer@spencer.ann-arbor.mi.us   spencer@ais.org
>"This isn't a man who is leaving with his head between his legs."  -- Quayle,
> about Sununu's resignation
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: 1996 GOP Veep Choice (Was: Re: Complete this sentence)
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 17:11:42 CST
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) writes:

>
> bx916@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Ross W. Starkey) writes:
>
> > Everbody's talking about Kemp/somebody in 1996, but isn't Kemp a little
> > flakey?  Smart, yes, but flakey.  Kind of like an intellectual Perot?
>
> Kemp an INTELLECTUAL Perot? God, that's a scary thoght.
>
> -----
> Eric Smith
> erics@infoserv.com
> CI$: 70262,3610
>
>

I remember a great Sunday _Doonesbury_ from just after the election in '88,
dealing with drunk voting.  The punch line was "Drinking and voting, don't do
it.  Your next President may be Jack Kemp!"



|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: sstarr@nyx.cs.du.edu (Scott Starr)
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 92 17:22:44 GMT


More about those 128 tax increases... A
According to The New Republic (ooo... a liberal magazine!  I can just see
some right winger thinking to himself "gee, even though this magazine has
won several puletzer prizes for journalism it must be wrong, because it is
liberal...)  the original list did include several blank lines and
repititions.  In addition it included a 5$ fee for a dog track operating
liscense.  Also a small fee for having an abortion (boy, I bet the right
wing sure hates that tax increase...) and many other increadibly
incidental fees.  B
Yes, Bill Clinton "raised taxes" 128 times in 12 years as Governor.  Of
course, by the same exacting standards G. Bush raised taxes over 200 times
in 4 years.  Dear me...
I think we should all stop referring to the foamingmadwackorightwingers as
Republicans.  The Republican party started out as a nice, anti-slavery
party.  It really doesn't deserve this.
Perhaps re-name it the Silly Party?
SCOTT
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Shame! Where are the real fans?
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 10:12:07 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


garrett@Ingres.COM (It's not what you got, it's what you give) writes:

> 	And even if the shrub-man doesn't get impeached, there is still 
> '94 (He DID promise to run for president in 1994)

I think he's got something there. After all, he might win in a year
in which nobody else is running.

As for the fate of this group, I believe we need to be ever-vigilant
against the Danster's return to the national stage. Look at it this
way: we've won the hot war; now we have to win the cold war.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Complete this sentence
Date: 8 Nov 1992 19:05:27 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock) writes:

>In article <22939@duke.cs.duke.edu>, ingram@cs.duke.edu (Robert "E" Ingram)
>writes:
>> If Bush is a "lame duck", then Quayl is a _____ ______.

>Locomotivly impaired aquatic foul?

No... 

Loquaciously impaired aquatic fowl.

							--  Michal
From: michael@albert.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bell-weather areas (was Re: Weekly Reader wrong! Who else?)
Date: 5 Nov 92 21:27:02 GMT
	<MICHAEL.92Nov4220256@albert.bu.edu> <1da60nINN39s@uwm.edu>
	<1992Nov5.121308.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu>
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Boston University
In-reply-to: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu's message of 5 Nov 92 19:13:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.121308.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu> f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin) writes:

  =For those of you checking, the NY Times has a long piece on what bell-
  =wethers for the election failed in 1992.

  =* Weekly Reader kids picked Bush.
  =* The loser of the NH primary won the general election.
  =* Crook County, Oregon, picked Bush.
  =* Noted psychics Joyce Jillson and Jeane Dixon prophesied a Bush win.
  =* Ray C. Fair's formula (based on several economic indicators) predicted
  =a Clinton landslide defeat.  The only previous times it has failed were
  =1960, 1968, and 1976.
  =* The Democrats did not carry Texas, yet still won the general election.
  =* The American League won the World Series, indicating a Republican win.
  =This test has failed previously only in 1980 and 1984.
  =* There was a poor Beaujolais grape harvest in France, indicating a
  =Republican win.

There's also the Minnesota Vikings' election eve game...
  =Get the paper...it has conmplete election outcomes for all you numbers
  =freaks.
 
chaplin
--
=========================================================================
Michael A. Chaplin           If you want *their* opinions, ask *them*.
michael@albert.bu.edu ....The Einstein Papers Project, Boston, Mass., USA
chaplin@husc.harvard.edu ....Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., USA
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6586 talk.bizarre:37606
From: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu ("[*] The One True Cross")
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: Actual Dan Quayle Interview
Date: 11 Nov 92 02:36:37 GMT
	<1992Nov9.194519.21570@netcom.com>
Followup-To: misc.misc
Organization: Eaters of Wisdom
In-reply-to: madhaus@netcom.com's message of 9 Nov 92 19:45:19 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.194519.21570@netcom.com> madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann) writes:
>   Oh yeah, and plenty of other people on the net have acknowledged that
>   I am funny.  Guess you lose that argument.

Plenty of people watch `Hee Haw'.






--

                And for to se, and eek for to be seye
Mark-Jason Dominus 	  			    mjd@central.cis.upenn.edu 

                                                       DOZENS, literally
                                                       DOZENS, i say.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: ralph@cbnewsi.cb.att.com (ralph.winslow)
Subject: Re: Integrity
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 11:32:37 GMT

In <1992Nov12.144138.3639@gvl.unisys.com> train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge) writes:
>In <carlson.721539119@cwis>, carlson@cwis.unomaha.edu (Brian D. Carlson) writes:
>|> 	Charles Dickens spelled potato with an 'e' on the end.
>
  <lots of cool stuff deleted for brevity>
>
>|> 
>|> brian d carlson
>   ^^^^^ ^ ^^^^^^^
>  Note the adroit use of capitalization and punctuation.
>
Come on, Herb, he's only just learned to spell it right.  Give the kid a break!

Ralph
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: olt@elwood.isgs.uiuc.edu (Scott Olt)
Subject: Re: seconding the motion . . . .
Organization: Madame Tinkertoy's House of Blue Lights
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 09:34:15 GMT

Linda.Brigman@launchpad.unc.edu (Linda Brigman) writes:

>>alt.politicians.stupid.jesse-helms

>Well, not exactly, but you get the idea & I *don't* get emacs (or any
>other editor I've come across in U**X-land) BUT, unfortunately, Jesse
>doesn't *say* stupid stuff, he just is.  No humor there except the
>gallows sort.  Jesse USED to be funny, but that was many years ago,
>before he got elected to public office.  

Umm, Linda...I see you're posting from NC, but I gotta wonder how
you know that Jesse was funny before he was elected? Is he a personal
friend of yours?

Just curious...

--
Scott Olt                           "If a program can't rewrite its own code, 
Ill. St. Geological Survey           what good is it?" - Mel, a Real Programmer
olt@elwood.isgs.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rdetweil@boi.hp.com (Richard Detweiler)
Subject: a.f.d-q matchmaker update?
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 22:23:36 GMT
Organization: Hewlett Packard - Boise Printer Division



As I too rue the day that this newsgroup folds up its tent and
heads off to wherever its headed I've been thinking back to 
all the good laughs I got from here: GRANT CUNNINGHAM, John
Switzer, Tucker's e-mail, the invasion of the Limboids, the
wonderful postings of dks, the Quayle Quotes List itself et. al.,
there is one nagging question...

What ever became of the guy that got lucky by spouting a few 
Quayle quotes never to be seen again by his friends?  Did he
ever make it back from Family Values heaven?  Enquiring minds
want to know.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: chesnutt@adobe.com (Stan Chesnutt)
Subject: Re: Latin lessons
Organization: Tuesday Weld Fan Club
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 21:48:51 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.204210.11622@mprgate.mpr.ca> duncan@mprgate.mpr.ca (Nick Duncan) writes:
>I heard a Dan Quayle story that I'm not sure is true. It went something
>like this:
>
>Dan overheard an American diplomat saying something in French to 
>somebody. Afterwards, he went up to the diplomat and said that it
>was wonderful she spoke Latin, he'd always wished he'd paid more 
>attention during Latin classes so that he could really communicate
>with those people down in Latin America. 
>
>It says something about the glory that is Dan that I would even
>think this is true, but is it?
>

This is one of the "it sounds so much like Dan, that it must be true!"
sayings that was not actually spoken by our esteemed Veep.  I rememeber
hearing that this story was made up by a journalist after DQ's visit to
Latin America ("If I had learned more Latin, then I would be able to speak
with the people").

Of course, for Dan to say that, it would be necessary for him to be a
master of the subjunctive tense.  I'm not sure he's of that caliber.

Everything Dr. Dan has said in public is on video or audio tape, or
has a fair number of witnesses.  I can't provide a source for the
comment cited above.

-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Stan Chesnutt,  Adobe Systems			      chesnutt@mv.us.adobe.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton)
Subject: Re: Complete this sentence
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 19:34:02 GMT

In article <1djodnINNl01@gap.caltech.edu> peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
>>In article <22939@duke.cs.duke.edu>, ingram@cs.duke.edu (Robert "E" Ingram)
>>writes:
>>> If Bush is a "lame duck", then Quayl is a _____ ______.
>
>
>Loquaciously impaired aquatic fowl.
>
Loquaciously impaired aquatic fowle.

Cat


Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6467 alt.politics.bush:13499 alt.politics.clinton:16370
From: Corby.E.Page@dartmouth.edu (Corby E. Page)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Date: 7 Nov 92 19:25:49 GMT
 <14596.2afb3690@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a5@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <14596.2afb3690@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>
vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:

> > I'm sure you'd be much happier in Argentina. That's where the last batch
> > of fascists found refuge.
> > 
> Eric, in-as-much that I support your point of view, I think you mean Brazil
> (not Argentina).

Maybe you could clarify yourself. What I am sure that Eric is referring
to is the fact that several Nazi organizations have taken up hiding in
Argentina, where they have actively persecuted Jews and queers. In the
past few years, several Nazi war criminals have been found here, and
there has been a Nazi or two in the upper levels of the Argentinian
government. I didn't know Brazil could match this.

corby
From: paul@music.sie.arizona.edu (Paul J. Sanchez)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Date: 6 Nov 92 20:05:38 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

Martin S. Weinhous Ph.D. writes
> 
> The aforementioned Robert D. Davis has been added to my kill file. I
> have no time to waste on his completely absurd noise. Further, I would
> suggest that we all ignore him - perhaps he will just go away.
> 
> Quayle an intellignet _gentleman_ - not on this planet!
>           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I can't see fit to follow in your footsteps.  Davis has provided the most  
entertainment I've seen here in a while, since the Repubs had Danoe on  
such a short leash during the election.  (In fact, I have very high hopes  
for the next couple of months.  There's no need to muzzle the VP now, so  
we'll get his insights unfiltered for a short but hopefully glorious  
finale!)

With regard to Davis, I certainly don't intend to respond to him directly  
but I will continue to enjoy his posts.  Somebody should tell him to try  
to eat more fiber, though.

--paul

"If you can't change your mind when faced by facts, are you sure you've  
still got one?"
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Date: 11 Nov 92 23:01:00 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

: rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
:  
: : Unfortunately, Billy Boy & Gorey Al  won the election even though the peo
: : did select President Bush and VP Quayle via the popular vote.  What a sa
I seem to have missed the original post on this so perhaps I missed
the point, but could somebody clue me in?  Last time I looked,
Clinton won the popular vote.  Has there been a secret recount?
Bill
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle