HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jeffb@audiolab.UWaterloo.ca ()
Subject: Spoilers for "The Hidden Driveway"
Originator: jeffb@audiolab.UWaterloo.ca
Organization: Audio Research Group, University of Waterloo
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 04:02:32 GMT

Netters!

Spoiler for "The Hidden Driveway" follows,

Did that work?

	There is a rumour of an upcoming 6th season episode in which Sela takes
a Warbird back to the 23rd century (post STVI) and captures several members of 
the TOS crew in a diabolical plot to alter the course of Federation history.
It is not certain if Wm. Shatner has signed for the episode or not but          apparently Capt. Sulu will be appearing with the Excelsior along with "several
familiar faces" in the crew.  The uplink date is supposed to be during the week
Nov. 31 to Dec 6.  Has any one else heard about this?  I am losing sleep over
this one!  Help!

*********************************************************************************       "If I want to be assimilated, I'll ask"  Capt. Picard "BOBW I"         *********************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU (macphil)
Subject: Re: Q and Riker
Organization: IUPUI
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 16:47:13 EST

In article <22327@galaxy.ucr.edu>
judson@watnxt2.ucr.edu (Michael Judson) writes:
 
>I was watching a re-run of the episode when Q gives Riker the power of the
>Q.  His reasoning was that the Q continuum wanted to learn more about the
>humans.  Picard, after learning about Riker's powers, told him that Q had
>muttled has brain.  Was Tasha correct in saying that the Q only wanted to
>use humans as objects of ridicule, or something like that?  That by giving
>Riker the Q power, they could all laugh at him because he wouldn't know how
>to use it, etc?  Or, was Q right?  That humans have a quality that the Q
>couldn't understand and soon would become more powerful than themselves?
>And was Picard jealous, as Q insisted?  That he only told Riker that the
>Q had muttled his brain because he was jealous?
 
How about they'd make fun of him because he was different? Not better,
worse, etc, but d-i-f-f-e-r-e-n-t ?  Didn't you ever watch "Rudolph,
The Red Nosed Reindeer" ???
 
>"I drank what?" -- Socrates
 
More precisely, Val Kilmer's character in _Real Genius_
 
>judson@watserv.ucr.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman)
Subject: Re: Season 6 opener: The Enterprise vs Q for the sanity of Rebecca DeMorney
Organization: The Admiral's Unix System & The Grid BBS
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 02:16:11 GMT

In article <67494@hydra.gatech.EDU> cegtitd@prism.gatech.EDU (Tim Dodd) writes:
>In article <BtyEGp.JM2@acsu.buffalo.edu> v129j6ed@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (This is F.U.N.) writes:
>>The crew are flung to the late 20th century and battle Q to save the mind
>>and life of Rebecca DeMorney's character in The Hand That Rocks the Cradle.
>>Q's plan was to wipe out Picard before he ever existed, and that his
>>ancestory has a key point with her. 
>
>How can this be?  How can the Enterprise crew not only travel into the past,
>but into a *fictional* past?  Furthermore, how can Picard's origin be some-
>how tied up in this fictitious past?

Well, we know from ST VI that Spock is related to Sherlock Holmes, why can't\
Picard be related to Rebecca DeMornay's character in 'Hand That Rocks the
Cradle' (can somebody who's seen the movie provide a name for her?)


-- 
"Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ray, when somebody asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" -- Winston Zeddmore
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Subject: Re: The Borg are here!!!
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 20:19:20 GMT

In <1992Sep9.185928.17825@newshost.unh.edu> cde@kepler.unh.edu (Charles D Elfe) writes:

>moments ago, when I stood face-to-face with... (deep breath)... a Borg: 
>a single nozzle, hot-air, wall-mounted hand drier, model A-5. (It was even
>UL tested! - Oh, No!)

>It seems that the Borg are being backed by 
>corporate America: it was listed as a *division* of the Beatrice Corp. (Yikes!)

I can see it now...
"Free will is irrelevant.
 Fair trade is irrelevant.
 We are Beatrice.
 We will be assimilated."

			Jamesa Willer
{the opinions above are probably NOT those of
 anyone at all}
From: neil@ccl.umist.ac.uk (Neil P.G.)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Romulans as Borg?
Date: 8 Sep 92 10:08:12 GMT
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre

In <1992Sep4.193657.27310@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> jeffery@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (JEFFERY ERIC ROBERT) writes:

>Okay, I have heard about Vendetta, I will read it.  I have also had a lot of
>people mention assimilating only races not individuals.  My respose to this
>is that in "The Neutral Zone" it was shown that the Borg took away some
>Romulan outposts.  Where are these people?  

>The best response that I received about the Borg is the fact that they change
>the DNA of the host body.  It is probable that they have taken many other
>humanoid races and just altered their DNA.  Anyway, it is an interesting
>point.  Thanks for all the replies-  

Which seems to suggest that, unless this DNA is *remarkably* similar
to human DNA, Picard is a changed man...

--
Neil Perret-Green (neil@ccl.umist.ac.uk)    __
DIY Disclaimer (delete as appropriate):     \/
These opinions/views/rantings are not necessarily those of this university/
mine/those of a sane person and may not be relevant/true/coherent.
From: mwalker@novell.com (Mel Walker)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Scotty's return:  What rank?
Date: 15 Sep 92 15:04:45 GMT
Organization: Committee to Elect Dan Quayle Lord of the Cosmos
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A6DB57C955011E09@mwalker1.npd.provo.novell.com>
X-Xxdate: Tue, 15 Sep 92 16:05:13 GMT
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d9

In article <He14qB20w165w@bluemoon.use.com> Darrin J. Redick,
djredick@bluemoon.use.com writes:
>landrews@outb.wimsey.bc.ca (Luke Andrews) writes:
>
>> >Anyone taking bets on what rank Mr. Scott will have when he returns
>> >to TNG?  By my observation, he was a commander in TWOK, a captain in
TSFS,
>> >a commander again in TVH, and a captain again in TFF and TUC.  
>> >
>> >I guess he and Riker have trouble accepting authority.
>> 
>> Well, it is a bit weird.  Admiral Morrow tells him he is a Captain in
TSFS --
>> 
>> So perhaps his promotion was delayed all the way until the end of Star
Trek I
> 
>No eye for detail at all...look CLOSELY at the shoulder strap in III when
>Scotty is walking towards the turbolift in the Excelsior engine room.  It
>CLEARLY shows his insignia as CAPTAIN, esp. in the closeup of him & 
>Styles.
>
>As for him being a commander in IV, that was the studio's fault.  His
>rank was mistakenly made a commander, instead of a captain.
>
>> 
>> But he's probably a captain or admiral in ST:TNG.
>> 
>I'm willing to bet that he will be Captain.

Wasn't his position "Captain of Engineering" or some such? I seem
to recall something like that, but it could be from a book.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: runyan@cup.hp.com (Mark Runyan)
Subject: Re: PAD
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 15:08:51 GMT
Organization: HP, Cupertino, CA, USA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

ekho@cybernet.cse.fau.edu (amanda rothman) writes:
>rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon) writes:
>>In <65270@cup.portal.com> Peter_A_David@cup.portal.com writes:
>>>I dunno.  I heard Peter David hates everybody.
>> I heard he has a crummy sense of humor, too.
>But he writes pretty good... ;}

When he writes...   (When *is* that next book, anyway? :-)

Mark Runyan
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: docz@iunet.ann-arbor.mi.us (docz)
Subject: Re: burger king 
Organization: Innovative Concepts
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 16:06:16 GMT

In article <24@freddyk.uucp> Edwardl@freddyk.uucp (Ed Langenback) writes:
>wh20@iastate.edu (Gregory D Westwater) says:
>>the burger king on downtown lincolnway cheats customers.  they gave me a punch card, and now that i am getting bigger and bigger items for free, they have stopped honoring the card.  They said it is >impossible that they gave me the card and that they haven't seen them before.  BULLL!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 
>so?  i'm curious, when did this become rec.arts.startreck.burgerking?  ;)
>
>-- 
>|=================================================================|
>|                   NightMares Are Forever                        |
>|=================================================================|
>|EdwardL@Freddyk.uucp           ...engr.uark.edu!freddyk!edwardl  |
>|SysOp: Springwood BBS 1-(501)-582-2519  CoCo3-OS-9, RiBBS v2.02  |
>|=================================================================|
>|"Though it's cold and lonely in the deep, dark night,            |
>| I can see paradise by the dashboard light"                      |
>|                                      --MeatLoaf, Bat out of Hell|
>|=================================================================|

Oh.. you mean there are some people that weren't informed of the change?

<g>

JAM
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 15:22:55 EDT
From: <HCM100@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: address of studio...
Distribution: rec
 <92251.004112HCM100@psuvm.psu.edu> <MERLYN.92Sep7104527@romulus.reed.edu>

In article <MERLYN.92Sep7104527@romulus.reed.edu>, merlyn@ora.com (Randal L.
Schwartz) says:

>In article <92251.004112HCM100@psuvm.psu.edu> HCM100@psuvm.psu.edu writes:

>>  The ST:TNG Script Coordinator is Eric Stillwell.

>>  Address:  Eric A. Stillwell, Script Coordinator
>>            Star Trek: The Next Generation
>>            Paramount Pictures Corporation
>>            5555 Melrose Avenue, Hart 104
>>            Los Angeles, CA  90038-3197


>A friend of mine who is probably a bigger trekker than me says:

>        I talked to Eric Stillwell myself, and he said that he no longer
>        works for Paramount, and has gone over to Creation Conventions.

>So, this information is old, but the address is still likely to work.

Good point.  I was looking at my submission guidelines, not my latest
letter from Paramount.  That one is signed by LOLITA FATJO.  She's
the script coordinator as of this season.  My boo-boo.  :-)

She sent me info stating that Deep Space 9 scripts will not be accepted
for about eight months (until the season has a chance to get it's own feet
and get established by the staff writers), and that they will NOT be
considering outside work until then.  As for ST:TNG, Good luck.  They're
still accepting them, but they get so damned many....


Hans C. Masing | HCM100@PSUVM.psu.edu  | Penn State University MIS Dept |

If a kid asks where rain comes from, I think a cute thing to tell him is
"God is crying."  And if he asks why God is crying, another cute thing to
tell him is "Probably because of something you did."  - Jack Handey
From: kuchar@buast7.bu.edu (Tom Kuchar)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Conspiracy
Date: 11 Sep 92 19:28:13 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <1992Sep11.184419.27962@watson.ibm.com> rrogers@watson.ibm.com (Ryan Rogers) writes:
>
>   I've seen a lot of TNG on a lot of different stations, and this episode
>is *rarely* shown.  Why?

I think it touched too close to home for the powers that be. There's
a conspiracy not to show it anymo









-- 
Tom Kuchar			  
kuchar@buast7.bu.edu		  -or-                      kuchar@plh.af.mil
Department of Astronomy		                     Phillips Laboratory/GPOB
Boston Univerity		                                  Hanscom AFB
From: dave@gergo.tamu.edu (Dave Martin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: deep space nine
Date: 14 Sep 1992 21:48:00 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: Geochemical & Environmental Research Group, Texas A&M University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Sep13.3208.10680@dosgate>, "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com> writes...
}Some spoilers on DSN but mostly my opinions.
} 
}I seriously doubt you can judge a characters originality based on their
}gender!  I mean, TOS they did a male doctor, TNG they did a female
}doctor, so then what's left for DSN?  Sure, you can have an androgynous
}N'gii but why?  DSN's doctor is a male but you can't say "Oooh!  A McCoy
}mock-up!  CHEEAP!".  From what I found, Pulaski was a CHEAAAAP McCoy
}mock-up.  But anyways, I think everyone is original and will work well
}except for, perhaps, the shapeshifter Odo.  Sure, a shapeshifter
}is original and neat but yet again, we have a character who seeks to be
}"more human" and is continually trying to contemplate humanity.  Odo
}will already be PART human unlike Data who has no emotions and thus,
}CANNOT be human (okay, that part is up for debate) which will be a bit
}of a change, but basically the Spock/Data premise will be there.

Yes, Pulaski was a rather obvious recast of a slightly-altered McCoy mold.
Odo, on the other hand, from what little info has been released about the
character, does sound a bit more original than you make him out to be.
For one, Odo is not "PART human" -- he is completely alien and is not to be
considered human, despite the form he wears for the convenience of others.
For another, Odo does not seek to be "more human" -- he seeks himself, and
his background. From what I've read of him he has no desire to be human.
I do agree that Odo is a character of the Spock/Data mold, but where Spock
was half-human and trying to deny his human half, and Data is non-human and
desiring to be more human-like, Odo is non-human with no desire to be human
but forced by convenience to look human-ish.
Similar in general, quite different in execution, much like Spock and Data. 

 -                                                                     -
 - Dave Martin - Geochemical & Environmental Research Group, Texas A&M - 
 - DAVE@GERGA[GERGO,GERGI].TAMU.EDU - BROOKS@TAMVXOCN.BITNET - AOL:DBM -
 -                                                                     -
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ras@kepler.unh.edu (Robert A Seace)
Subject: Re: Was TOS really that bad? (Re: TOS actors)
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 13:46:32 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.084412.24835@wixer.cactus.org> raistlin@wixer.cactus.org (Eli Boaz) writes:

[Lot's deleted...]

>I suppose this is just another case where individual likes and dis-likes
>will win out, not arguments...
>

	True...  It always seems to come down to this...  But, it's still
fun to argue about it once in a while... ;-)

||======================================================================||
||  Robert A. Seace  ||  Senior at UNH  ||  E-mail: ras@kepler.unh.edu  ||
||    AKA: Agrajag   ||     CS major    ||  or, maybe: ras@nic.unh.edu  ||
||======================================================================||
"His five-year mission to seek out and explore strange new worlds, and sell
 Advanced Music Substitute Systems to their restaurants, elevators, and
 wine bars!" - So Long, and Thanks For All the Fish

Gene Roddenberry: 1921-1991.  You will be missed.
May your dream "Live long and prosper".

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com (PuterDude)
Subject: Re: Scotty's return:  What rank?
Organization: Organized? Just look at my desk!
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 14:12:50 GMT

 rchen@andromeda.rutgers.edu (Ronald K. Chen) acts like a bookie...

>Anyone taking bets on what rank Mr. Scott will have when he returns
>to TNG?

More wrinkles and weight?   :)

-- 
Puter	puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com	.sig by Generic Labels
(Put irritating title here)		(Put phone # here.)
(Put obnoxious quote here. Please make it as long as possible.)
From: crl0195@hertz.njit.edu (Curt R Lindmark)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: STVI
Date: 8 Sep 92 18:12:45 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Sep8.110422.5157@gw.wmich.edu> 91babik@gw.wmich.edu (Lisamarie Gemma Babik) writes:
>In article <24660@oasys.dt.navy.mil>, cmiller@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Catherine Miller) writes:
>> In one episode of ST:TNG, I heard Troi referred to as "Sir".  Does any
>> one know why "sir" instead of "ma'am"?0
>> __________
>Because she is an officer, and presumably Star Fleet is the military.  All
>officers are referred to as "Sir."

Technically, Star Fleet is not a military service, it is an exploration 
service.  They use a miltaristic chain of command becuase that is the most
effective in a "hot" situation.  They are also trained in "military" matters
becuase sooner or later those skills are going to be needed.  The usage of 
"sir" really has to do addressing someone holding a higher rank than yourself,
just as "Mr." can be used to address someone of a lower rank.  Gender never
plays a part.  E.G.: In The Kobiyashi Maru scenario in Star Trek II: TWOK, 
Spock refers to Saavik as "Mr. Saavik", even though Saavik is a woman.

O========|>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<|========0
 Curt R Lindmark      crl0195@hertz.njit.edu         Defender from ages past

Picard: "Mr. Worf, fire at will."
Worf: "With pleasure, sir." (draws hand phaser, takes aim)
Riker: "Oh no, not again" (ducks for cover)

Disclamier: NJIT is responsible for nothing I don't say which isn't mine.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: wcsbeau@alfred.carleton.ca (OPIRG)
Subject: Re: STVI
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 12:33:11 GMT

In <rawdon.715917013@cs.wisc.edu> rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon) writes:
>In <24660@oasys.dt.navy.mil> cmiller@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Catherine Miller) writes:
>>In one episode of ST:TNG, I heard Troi referred to as "Sir".  Does any
>>one know why "sir" instead of "ma'am"?0

>Presumably because she's an officer.  Therefore she was referred to as "sir"
>for the same reason Lt. Saavik was in Star Trek II.

So far as I can remember, all females on/in Trek (all series) are
refered to as "Sir", at least by those of lower rank.  I can't think
of any times when they were reffered to as "ma'am".  Can anyone else?

I don't really find it strange, but it did strike me as being a little
odd the first time I caught it.

Christopher Allen
(wcsbeau@alfred.carleton.ca)
From: 885celio@gw.wmich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: "Time's Arrow" foreshadowing? NO SPOILERS
Date: 10 Sep 92 10:15:09 EST
Organization: Western Michigan University

Has anyone noticed that if you say "Time's Arrow" a few times really fast
it starts to sound like "Time Zero"?

Coincidence?...
				--Gail
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: trw@spl1.spl.loral.com (Tim R Witort)
Subject: Plots for 2 shows
Organization: Loral Software Productivity Laboratory
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 23:25:21 GMT

I missed a couple of episodes and need a brief plot description for:

1) Imaginary Friend

2) Cost of Living

Thanks loads,
-- Tim
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: The Man Trap
From: ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead)
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 92 23:32:02 PDT
Organization: Paradox Alley F&SF BBS 805-492-8789

rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon) writes:

> >In article <sPmiqB3w164w@kryton.UUCP> ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead) 
> >>In the TOS episode guide that Starlog put out The Man Trap is listed 5th,
> >>not including The Cage.  I'm not sure if that is the shooting order or
> >>not, they do not say.  Although I did find it interesing that it wasn't
> >>listed first, so maybe it is a shooting order.  It lists, Where No Man
> >>Has Gone Before, The Corbomite Maneuver, Mudd's Women, The Enemy Within,
> >>and The Man Trap, in that order.  Can anyone with a better guide tell
> >>me if this is, in fact, the order they were shot?  
> 
> 
> Allan Asherman's _Star_Trek_Compendium_ (to my knowledge the best readily-
> available Trek Classic source available, given that the _Concordance_ is
> *not* readily available to most people, including yours truly) has an
> appendix which lists the air dates of all Trek Classic episodes.  The main
> listings for all episodes are given in production order (though I forget how
> "production order" is defined, since many episodes were not finished in 
> postproduction in the same order that filming began).
> 
> Incidentally, most Trek Classic reruns these days (that I've seen) are done
> in production order (coinciding with that in the _Compendium_).
> 


<Slapping Forehead-sounds of unused braincells rattling around>
Ahh yes, of course, the Concordance!!  Yes, I do have one of those.
<Spinning the little wheel, finding the Man Trap....going to the page>
Oh well, it lists the shows in "broadcast" order.  The Man Trap
9/8/66.  Well back to the drawing board.  I'm going to go under the
assumption that the Starlog episode guide is in production order,
much like the Compendium.  Yeah, that Concordance is handy.  Worth
a few bucks so I hear.  I've an original Tech. Manuel too.  Married to 
a long time Trekker.  I guess you could call it a dowry.  :)  Can guys
have a dowry??  Ahh what's a little Trek memorobilia betweem spouses? :)


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Catherine Beckstead                    ace@kryton.uucp
"Do you want to argue with a can of deodorant that registers
NINE on the Richter scale?"        --Ace, in "Dragonfire"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: rccarm00@mik.uky.edu (ron c carman)
Subject: DSN Doctor: Amoros or Bashir??
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 18:00:14 GMT

   Well, now that *spoilers* seem to be flying right and left
about DSN, the contradictions will start coming as well.  Here's
the first:  Two recent articles detailed the characters who
will be in the show, but the articles disagree on the name of
the Station's doctor.  One says it is Dr. Julian Amoros, the 
other contends that it's Dr. Julain Bashir.
   Does anyone know which is correct?  I'm assuming this could
be due to a couple causes:
                            1) Simple misinformation
                            2) The doctor's name was changed...

RC Carman

--
/=======================================================================\ 
|     Ron C. Carman          || 'What you want is irrelevant.           |
| rccarm00@mik.uky.edu       ||  What you have chosen is at hand.'      |
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU (macphil)
Subject: Re: stng unification??
Organization: IUPUI
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 23:13:04 EST

In article <1992Sep11.3208.10614@dosgate>
bernie.wong@canrem.com (bernie wong) writes:
 
>>Spock doesn't look much older than in ST VI:TUC
>
>What baffles me is that Nimoy looks older in real life sans-makeup than
>he did as an 120+ year old Vulcan in Unification!  :-)   Man, he looked
>OOOOOLD in the 25th Anniversary Special.
>
 
Think about it this way:  how old is Nimoy and what stage of life is
he in chronologically?  Now figure out what chronological stage a
120 year Vulcan would be in....
 
 
Make things simple, not simpler.  - Erasmus
 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: davidd@chinook.cs.washington.edu (David Doll)
Subject: address of studio...
Organization: /homes/gws/davidd/.organization
Distribution: rec
Date: 6 Sep 92 16:48:12


Hello, does anybody have the name (of the correct person) and address
of the studio where you would send in script suggestions? Thanks.

David

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: 2261as@gmuvax2.gmu.edu ( )
Subject: Re: Spiner on Tales..Dark Side?
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 01:27:34 GMT

How about Spiner as an attorney on some TV-style movie (forget
the title) where a couple of adolescent ladies get sent to jail
(Andy Griffith plays a judge and --I believe one of the lady's names
is Nikki Noll?).  Uhh, yeah.

Or Spiner as Bob Wheeler on Night Court.

-- 
My signature file...
Cool huh?
Gee, only one more line to fill up.
How's this?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current