HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: acs@csri.toronto.edu (Alvin Chia-Hua Shih)
Subject: Re: Canon Remote Control RC-1 (for Elan, 10s, etc.) Question
Keywords: Canon question
Date: 25 Jan 93 17:20:13 GMT

In <1993Jan25.141302.5702@kodak.kodak.com> parker@ultra.Kodak.COM (Martin Parker) writes:

>In article <9214@lee.SEAS.UCLA.EDU> jcchang@paragon.icsl.ucla.edu (James Chang) writes:
>>Does anyone know the signal format of Canon remote control RC-1 (for Elan,
>>10s, etc.)? I'd like to make one if possible. I know I can buy one for $20,
>>and I probably can't make it any cheaper, but I am still interested in
>>knowing. If anyone has made one, could you also send me the schematics?
>>
>I am interested in this too. I'd like to add a timer, use different
>batteries, etc. 

If you're only interested in extending the functionality of the RC-1,
then I'd suggest buying one and hacking it apart.

ACS

-- 
 ___ ___ ___ ______________________________________________________________
|   |   | __|      Democracy is not a way of getting better solutions.     |
| - | --|__ |           It's just a way to spread the blame.               |
|_|_|___|___|______________________________________________________________|
Alvin_C._Shih____________________acs@csri.utoronto.ca______________________|
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: chorley@vms.ocom.okstate.edu
Subject: Re: Funky Leica Winder?
Organization: OSU College of Osteopathic Medicine
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:34:11 GMT

In article <7030020@hpunila.MSR.HP.COM>, rkatos@hpunila.MSR.HP.COM (Ray Katos) writes:
> I've heard of a Leicavit, made by Leitz for at least screw mount 
> cameras.  It replaced the baseplat and had a retractable lever.
> One squeeze advanced one film frame.  They are collectable now, 
> going from $600 to $1400.

I believe that the Leicavit was made for the M2 (poss also M3), the rapid
winder for the screw mount cameras was the SCNOO.
The motor for the Leica screw mount was the MOOLY. Such poetry!

dnc
From: zlsiida@fs1.mcc.ac.uk (dave budd)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Advice Needed on Photographing Fire
Date: 26 Jan 93 10:11:27 GMT
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre

>In article <1993Jan22.110804.2875@spider.co.uk>, mikec@spider.co.uk (Mike Coren) writes:
>> 
>> Can anybody offer any pearls of wisdom in regards to photographing fire?
>> I'll be in York for the Jorvik Viking Festival next month, and the final
>> event is the burning of a Viking longboat on the river.  It will probably
>> be late twilight or night.
>> 
I took some shots of the self-same festival a few years back when I'd only 
just got my SLR.  Basically I found that if the burning longship filled most 
of the frame, the fire gets metered and everything else is a bit dark, and 
if there's too much non-fire in the frame the scene gets metered the opther 
way and the flames are too bright to hold definition and look like flames.
I was a beginner then so I just hoped the camera meter would give me 
something usable, and when the flames covered about 1/4 of the frame it 
balanced about right.
During the preceding day you should be able to get some fun shots, like 
Viking infantry checking out 20th century clothes shop windows etc.  For the 
staged battles you want to get in close or get a long lens, not easy with 
all the crowds, and the plastic crowdcontrol tapes look bloody awful if you 
get them in the frame.
Don't forget the still-smouldering hulk of the longboat next morning, plus 
probably a few well hungover Vikings.


            All creatures will make merry   (on pain of death)
    Dave Budd, MCC, Oxford Rd, Manchester, England    (44|0)61-275-6033
From: sog@craycos.com (Steve Gombosi)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Hasselblad TCC equipment???
Date: 25 Jan 93 17:19:42 GMT
Organization: Cray Computer Corporation

In article <1993Jan25.111854.5524@lth.se> f92mlu@efd.lth.se (Marcus Lundahl) writes:
>Here in the country of Hasselblad, Sweden, all kinds of equipment to
>Hasselblad is rather expensive. But I wonder, what is the price in the
>states on both new and used Hasselblad equipment (especially for the
>205TCC)? Is there alot of TCC used equipment available?

I have yet to see any used TCC equipment for sale - the system hasn't been
widely available for very long in the US. New prices for 205TCC w/80mm TCC
and the TCC back run somewhere between $9000 and $10000, which is 
approximately 4X the price of a new 500 C/M Classic outfit.
Used Hasselblad prices vary widely. 

Steve

How much is a TCC in Sweden? What's the exchange rate these days?
Xref: sparky rec.photo:24106 rec.antiques:1876 misc.forsale:35934
From: dshelton@galaxy.gov.bc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.photo,rec.antiques,misc.forsale
Subject: Re: Bell & Howell 245 PA
Date: 20 Jan 93 23:14:43 -0800
Organization: BC Systems Corporation

In article <1993Jan20.225411.19258@hubcap.clemson.edu>, ychen@hubcap.clemson.edu (User Chen) writes:
> I just inherited a 8mm projector.  It was kept in a old house for a long
> time.  When I test it today, I found it's almost like new, both
> optically and cosmetically.
> 
> I don't know much about this model Bell & Howell 245 PA, but looks like
> it's a very high quality projector. 17-27mm f1.6 lens. 
> 
> Does any one on the net can tell me the value of this projector.  It's 
> an extra equipment and I know 8mm equipments are almost extinct today.
> I might like to sell it.
> 
> Any information will be great appreciate.
> 

My experience is that these older 8mm projectors have little value. There's no
film available for 8mm cameras anymore. The last roll of Kodachrome I shot was
over $20 for 4 minutes - nobody could justify those economics.

I occasionaly pick up old BOLEX movie cameras if I see them but they (and 8mm
projectors) don't seem to be collectable items - maybe in a few decades..

If you can find someone out there who still wants to project 8mm film the
projector bulb might be the most valuable item - few of these are now
available.


Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: kfho@plains (Vampire )
Subject: F3 F2A Price ?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 04:28:58 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

Does anyone know the current price for the Nikon F2A white body, MD-12.?    
the body is start 80???????? 

--
!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~! 
! INTERNET :  kfho@plains.NoDak.edu    !   1261 10th St North, Apt#3	     ! 
! UUCP     :  !uunet!plains!kfho       !   Fargo , ND58102 Ph# 235-1442 (H)  !  
! BITNET   :  KFHO@PLAINS.BITNET       !   Office Ph# 237-8115 (IACC Rm212J) !
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: zrepachol@cc.curtin.edu.au
Subject: Re: EEE on a Canon T90
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 10:02:38 GMT

In article <PHR.93Jan21203708@napa.telebit.com>, phr@telebit.com (Paul Rubin) writes:
> In article <1993Jan22.031151.4163@gsm001.mendelson.com> gsmlrn@gsm001.mendelson.com (Geoffrey S. Mendelson) writes:
...
> Yow!  Does the Rebel have anything like this?
> A friend of mine's Rebel complains of a dead battery even
> when the battery is known good.  We haven't gotten around
> to sending it in for repair yet.

No. Only the EOS-1 uses a second battery. The others use a EEPROM. Sounds like
cruddy contacts for first try.

The EOS-1 should be old enough that early ones will start to drop their batter
on the floor soon. ( For early ones ) Any one know what the symtom/s is/are?

~Paul

Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: strong@tc.fluke.COM (Norm Strong)
Subject: Re: How dangerous are developer chemicals?
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 16:42:25 GMT

In article <C0v7w4.KzM@cs.psu.edu> dms@math.psu.edu (Dianne M Saunders) writes:
}
}I have recently enrolled in a photography course in which we will be
}developing our own film (black and white only).  This is my first
}experience with this process. I am concerned about the toxicity
}of the chemicals used and their effects on early pregnancy.  Sources
}checked so far, my professor and the textbook, were not helpful.

About 2% of the population suffers contact dermatitis from Metol, which
is a common developing agent; another 10% suffers minor irritation.  If
you're not amongst that group, I wouldn't worry.  
-- 

Norm Strong  (strong@tc.fluke.com)
2528 31st S.   Seattle WA 98144   USA
From: mjg@nwu.edu (Michael J Graven)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Photoswap 93-1 Theme announcement
Keywords: potoswap, theme, Feb. 30/93, mail
Date: 27 Jan 93 01:58:29 GMT
Article-I.D.: antioch.mjg.728099909
Reply-To: mjg@nwu.edu (Michael J Graven)
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA

Melanie Typaldos (melanie@cayman.amd.com) writes:

> Here in Austin, Texas, it is practically *never* winter in the
> sense of "winter scenes".  

Slip the surly bonds of literalism!  Interpret winter as it is in 
Texas.  To be sure, winter in Austin isn't winter in Aspen, but
you can certainly find some element of down-south winter worth
photographing.

> [Are] the photos really supposed to be taken in the 1.5 month
> period between when the theme is announced and the photos are due
> in or whether those of us who are climatically disadvantaged
> could submit photos from previous years?

Don't see why not.  The photo-swap isn't a test, nor a competition:
it's a swap, a chance to share your work.

> ----Melanie

--
-Michael                                        "The ball shall be spherical."
mjg@nwu.edu                        -- NCAA basketball regulations, rule 1.1.14
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: donl@glass.esd.sgi.com (donl mathis)
Subject: Re: Avoid FOTO CELL!  Avoid FOTO CELL!  Avoid FOTO CELL!
Reply-To: donl@glass.esd.sgi.com (donl mathis)
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 00:39:41 GMT


In article <lmdsgjINNl40@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM>,
fiddler@concertina.Eng.Sun.COM (steve hix) writes:

|> I have come to the conclusion that Popular Photography's "Seal of Approval"
|> that appears on a bunch of dealer ads in the magazine just means that the
|> dealers in question pay for their ad space promptly.
|> 
|> It has nothing whatsoever to do with dealers actually providing any
|> service to customers.

You are now Enlightened, my son.

- donl mathis at Silicon Graphics Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA
donl@sgi.com
From: stb@dasher.cc.bellcore.com (becker,sheldon t)
Subject: Re: small studio flash
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 16:07:37 GMT
Summary: White-Lightnings
Keywords: cheap request


I have two White-Lightnings 10000's and also an ultra 600 and ultra 1200.
For the bang per buck - the White-lightnings are hard to beat.  The WL run
about $250 but sometimes are on sale -- with a stand and umbrella for about
$275.  The modeling light/strobe relationship is reasonable and the service
from the company is excellent.  The ultras are much better built but also cost
additional.  I used one single WL 10000 and an umbrella to take "head-shots"
for about 3 years and during that time I must have photographed about
200 to 300 people - the majority of who were very happy.
From: nelson@hepxvt.ps.uci.edu (Matt Nelson)
Subject: Re: Questions about Agfa Rodinal developer
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Date: 22 Jan 93 16:36:19 GMT

zrepachol@cc.curtin.edu.au writes:

>In article <1993Jan20.184653.1@cc.curtin.edu.au>, zrepachol@cc.curtin.edu.au writes:
>> In article <1993Jan19.221653.1@vms.ucc.okstate.edu>, hsia@vms.ucc.okstate.edu writes:
>>> I plan to develop my T-Max 35mm films by using Agfa Rodinal developer. Is
>>> there anyone can give me some informations for the mixing ratio and deloping
>>> time for T-Max film by using Rodinal? Thanks in advance.
>>> 
>> 
>> I use Rodinal at 50:1 for TMX, exposed for 80EI. Have times etc at home,
>> will post later. ( 9 min if I remember )
>> 
>> ~Paul
>> 
>> PS At the high dilutions, you are very dependant on the amount of chemistry
>> in the tank, so different tanks can give widely differing results.
>> 

>Yep, 9 min at 68F for 'normal' contrast. ONE film in a patterson at a time.
>( IE one film per litre ).

>Also TP, EI 25, 11 min in 100:1. Only agitate once per min. This may be a bit
>high contrast. I am thinking of changing it. *LOTS* cheaper than Technidol!!

>~Paul

Try using Ethol TEC for your TP.
From: kjm@ubbpc.tredydev.Unisys.COM (Ken J. McFadden)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Info needed on F3 AF
Date: 21 Jan 93 17:39:25 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Unisys UNIX Portation Center, Blue Bell, PA

In article <1993Jan20.175656.21401@cs.ucla.edu> jackie@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (Jacquelyn Trang) writes:
>
>
>       Hi,
>
>       I post this for a friend of mine, he can read news but for security
>   reasons, cannot post news.  So please post any response and he will
>   read it, but do not e-mail to me
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   Info needed on F3 AF, is it worthed buying? Can it be compared with
>   the F4? Or should I just go for the F4.  I like to maintain my AF lenses.
>
>   Thanks in advance.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The F3 AF cannot autofocus any current generation Nikon AF lens.  There are
only 2 AF lenses that the F3 AF can autofocus.  The F3 AF used focusing motors
in the lenses.  Up until the introduction of AF-I lenses a few months ago, all
other AF lenses used a focusing motor in the body.  The F3 AF does not have the
focusing motor in the body, so it can't focus most AF lenses.  I highly doubt
that the F3 AF can autofocus the new AF-I lenses either.

By the way, the only other body that can drive the F3 AF lenses is the F4.

I know, I have to get around to updating and posting the Nikon FAQ again, maybe
I'll have some free time soon...

---
Ken McFadden                     tredysvr!ubbpc!kjm@gvls1.vfl.paramax.com
Unisys Corporation               burdvax!ubbpc!kjm
Open Systems Marketing Services  (215) 986-3326
!!! NOTE THE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS (STRANGE, I DON'T WORK FOR PARAMAX) !!!
From: avk@hafnium.cchem.berkeley.edu (Tony Konashenok)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Re: Lecia abbrevation
Date: 28 Jan 1993 09:45:20 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: hafnium.cchem.berkeley.edu

It's easy: Ernst Leitz - Wetzlar is the name of the company,
Leica is the name of the line of products they make.

-- 
Tony Konashenok   avk@hafnium.cchem.berkeley.edu   (510)843-5632 (home)
University of California, Berkeley                 (510)642-5831 (office)

Strauss research group, Latimer Hall, UC Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720, U.S.A.
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: d88micla@odalix.ida.liu.se (Michael Larsson)
Subject: Re: Ilford DELTA 100: Info wanted
Organization: CIS Dept, Univ of Linkoping, Sweden
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:41:10 GMT

exjtmm@tts.lth.se (Thommy M. Malmstr|m) writes:


>Hi all,

>A couple of weeks (3) ago i saw some advertising of a new Ilford B/W
>film, namely the Delta 100. Since then i've asked for it in every local
>photoshop but they all says that it's delayed from the manufacturer.
>Are there anyone out there who has actually seen it yet? If so, is it
>as nice as the Delta 400? How is the grain compared to T-Max 100? What
>is the characterization (long or short toe, long or short shoulder)?

>/Thommy M.

>PS. Ilford is setting up a contest for the best picture on the theme
>'winter' where you are supposed to use Ilford film (Delta) and print
>material. Do they do this in any more countries than Sweden?

>--
>Thommy M. MALMSTR\M    |  o ,__Q  |  Lund Institute of Technology
>K{mn{rsv{gen 3 A:202   |  \-\_<,  |  Dept. of Communication Systems
>S-226 46 LUND, SWEDEN  | (*)/'(*) |  Box 118, S-221 00 LUND, SWEDEN
>+46-(0)46 13 21 78     |~~~~~~~~~~|  Tfn:+46-46 10 90 08, Fax:+46-46 14 58 23

Since you're in Sweden - look in the latest issue of the magazine Fotografi
(nr 1-2/93 p.34), they have tested it. The grain is about the same as
T-Max 100 and the characteristics are long toe and somewhat short shoulder,
and ISO 100 seems to be accurate. All according to the magazine. They 
recommend it in combination with Emaks K888 paper.

The only place I've seen it is in the Scandinavian Photo advertisement
lately in the same magazine.

           Michael Larsson, Linkoeping Univ. Sweden
                  d88micla@und.ida.liu.se

Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: borrel@dhhalden.no (B|rre Ludvigsen)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Nikon F2S DP-2 / DS-1 wanted
Date: 24 Jan 93 13:35:33 GMT
Organization: Ostfold College


Does anyone have a Nikon F2S DP-2 Photomic finder AND matching
DS-1 EE aperture control attachment kicking around? I might be
interested if the price is right.

- Barre Ludvigsen <borrel@dhhalden.no>

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Barre Ludvigsen                                borrel@dhhalden.no
Associate Professor, Architect        borrel@sigallah.dhhalden.no
Ostfold Regional College                            (NeXTMail OK)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: rspeirs@javelin.sim.es.com (Ron Speirs)
Subject: Re: Need fix for slides developed as prints
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Corp.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:11:38 GMT

In article <CAPELLA.93Jan21111113@masig.fsu.edu> capella@masig.fsu.edu (Jorge Capella) writes:
>A local photo shop recently developed several rolls of slide film as
>if they were prints.  We are now the owners of numerous "negative
>slides".  
>
>Does anyone know if it is possible to make good slides from these
>weird negatives?  Any information will be greatly appreciated.  

Occasionally, I have intentionally processed some slide film as yours was
processed, but for an entirely different reason: to get increased contrast
and saturation in shots of fireworks.

You can get slides from your "negatives", but they certainly won't be
"good" slides; the contrast will be high, the colors surrealistic, and
there will certainly be some color crossover.

The procedure I'm about to describe really falls into a home-darkroom,
do-it-yourself task.  Maybe you can find someone with the facility.

Sandwich the "negative slides" with a piece of developed, unexposed C-41
print film (to get the orange mask).  Duplicate it onto Vericolor Slide
Film 5072 or SO-279.  This is the film which is used to make color slides
from color negatives.  It is hard to predict your results, but hey, they
may be interesting.

In any case, I hope you got free replacement film and a sincere apology
from the photofinisher!

Ron Speirs, Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp., Salt Lake City, Utah


Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: asanders@adobe.com (Alan Sanders)
Subject: Re: Plastic Canon
Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 00:28:28 GMT

| "Plastic" is not always bad, nor is metal always good.

				    -Bob Atkins

Undoubtedly true. I think alot of the issue with Canon EOS
cameras and lenses has to do more with aesthetics and "feel"
than with functionality. The EOS 630 and RT had a MUCH better
look and feel than subsequent EOS models, but the lenses
were already "going plastic" when the 630 was current.

					-Alan
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: g9pben@cdf.utoronto.ca (Peter Bennison)
Subject: Compact Zoom Camera for Travelling.
Followup-To: g9pben@cdf.utoronto.ca (Peter Bennison)
Summary: What's good?
Originator: acs@genie.csri.toronto.edu
Keywords: compact zoom camera travel recommendations
Reply-To: g9pben@cdf.utoronto.ca (Peter Bennison)
Date: 22 Jan 93 22:56:44 GMT

Hello.  Ummm.  I'd appreciate any recommendations for a compact zoom
camera with autofocus, built-in flash, exposure compensation, 28-105mm
zoom, rugged, compact (weight not as important).

I would use my SLR setup but as I will be tramping across New Zealand
for 6 weeks, uh, umm, er, uh, size is an important consideration, and
ease of use.

My friend, who I am dictating this to, has a weird sense of humour.
Feel free to mug him. :-)

P.

P.S.: I do not have access to rec.photo.  Please email replies.
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: wampler@microunity.com (Kurt Wampler)
Subject: Glycin developer for Tech Pan?
Summary: Glycin-based developer formula sought for Kodak Tech Pan film
Keywords: Formula,Darkroom,Developer
Organization: MicroUnity Systems Engineering Inc.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 07:52:08 GMT


Does anyone out there have a good glycin-based developer formula suitable
for use with Kodak's Tech Pan film that would yield super-fine-grain
results with low-to-medium contrast?  The label on Kodak's Technidol
suggests it's a combination of glycin & hydroquinone.  I have a single
roll to process, and didn't want to buy the bulk container of Technidol
I was offered at the local photo store...

Kurt Wampler

Replies to:  wampler@MicroUnity.com
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: malu@imhps.im.se (Mats Luthman SYSTECON)
Subject: Re: Avoid FOTO CELL!  Avoid FOTO CELL!  Avoid FOTO CELL!
Organization: Industri-Matematik Data AB, Sweden
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:04:08 GMT

In article <1k2kn3INNesk@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> schen@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu () writes:
    Ihave had a similar experience with FOTO CELL about two years
    ago.
.
.
   I wrote to Popular Photography twice with no response at all.

When doing this, sending a copy of the letter to the company in question
can really get things going if there is the the slightest chance that
the story will come out. This worked for a person I know in a similar
situation.

--
Mats Luthman
Systecon AB (A subsidiary of Industri-Matematik AB)
Stockholm, Sweden
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: jacobson@cello.hpl.hp.com (David Jacobson)
Subject: Re: Sigma 24mm/2.8: Good quality?
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 00:33:45 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories

There has been a discussion of the Sigma 24mm f/2.8 wide angle lens.
I have this lens and have been quite pleased with it.  I was the one
who first posted about the curvature of field problem, so let me
repeat what I discovered.  If I focus some very distant object in the
corner of the viewfinder (not easy to do), the center is focused about
6 feet away.  However, in practice this has never been a problem,
first, because in closeups the corners are usually background, which
is farther away anyway, and secondly because with outdoor pictures I'm
usually using a small f-stop.

In article <106063@netnews.upenn.edu> liang@saul.cis.upenn.edu (Chuck
Liang) writes regarding the 

>  Another point is that, since Nikon AF cameras (with a few exceptions
>I understand) can still accept manual focus lenses, you can save a lot
>of money if you buy the manual focus version for Nikon.  It doesn't
>make much sense to me to get an autofocus wide angle lens.  The lens
>is rarely out of focus, and the depth of field scale is usually much
>more useful anyway.

There are several ways of using wide angle lenses.  One is to use them
to take in sweeping expanses.  In this usage I would agree that the
lens is rarely out of foucus.  But another way is to get up close.
For this, you still need to be careful with focusing.  The posting
implies that the depth of field scale is only available on the manual
focus model.  This is not true: my AF version has a depth of field
scale.  And, as someone else pointed out, the AF version is necessary
for matrix metering on most Nikon bodies.

  -- David Jacobson
Newsgroups: rec.photo
From: bremner@cs.sfu.ca (David Bremner)
Subject: Yet another purple tmax question
Summary: TMAX + Kodak indicator Stop
Reply-To: bremner@cs.sfu.ca (David Bremner)
Organization: CSS, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:58:23 GMT


I have just started developing TMAX-400 (actually I have just started
developing at all). 

I am using Kodak indicator stop, having cleverly noted that I should 
throw it out when it goes purple.  Unfortunately, it goes purple after
a single roll of TMAX.  Is this really exhausted, or is it just the
dye in the TMAX?

David



-- 
David Bremner / bremner@cs.sfu.ca / ubc-cs!fornax!bremner / (604)291-5938(days)
From: jimt@sunfse.ese.lmsc.lockheed.com (Jim S. Thompson)
Newsgroups: rec.photo
Subject: Nimslo 3D Camera Film Processing - Where to send film?
Keywords: stereo, 3D
Date: 25 Jan 93 22:22:59 GMT
Organization: LOCKHEED, Sunnyvale, CA


	Does anyone know where one can send film for processing that 
	was shot with the Nimslo Stereo camera?
Newsgroups: rec.photo,misc.forsale