HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: holst@mrl.arc.nasa.gov (Laura Holst)
Subject: Re: LOV:  Gif and the Baby
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Ames Res. Ctr. Mtn Vw CA 94035
Date: 25 Aug 1992 11:27 PST  

In article <25AUG199213011035@tm0006.lerc.nasa.gov>, vja8569@tm0006.lerc.nasa.gov (Vicki J. Adkins) writes...
>In article <1992Aug24.190925.119751@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman) writes...
>> 
>>     What do you think?  Will Tricia and Trucker have the baby christened
>>     within a week, giving Gif a chance to sell/give the baby to the mother he
>>     met at the adoption agency?
>      I think maybe Gif will kidnap the baby before the christening and trying
>	to get Christopher back will bring Trisha and Trucker back together.
>	I hope Gif does die, I just really dislike his entire character.

I think Gif should never have stopped taking his medication!  Geez, if this is
what happens to him when he stops... like the hallucinations with Trisha in
the portrait where she talks to him.  Maybe he'll be caught and sent away to
a mental hospital where he belongs (and Jeremy Hunter will take over the Art
Dept. at Alden U ;)

And another thing, I wonder why word hasn't gotten around that Trish and Gif
are going to be married !?  You'd think Dinah Lee would mention it to SOMEONE,
maybe Hannah?  Who then would mention it to Cooper, who then would say 
something to Isabelle ???  After all, I'm sure Dinah Lee was a bit shocked.
Oh well, IOAS.

--- Laura 'why does Gif hate his medication, anyway' Holst
    holst@merlin.arc.nasa.gov
From: pauls@tellabs.com (Paul Silver)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT:  Tornado Warning
Date: 25 Aug 92 17:11:29 GMT
Article-I.D.: tellab5.1992Aug25.171129.1397
Distribution: na
Organization: Tellabs, Inc., Lisle, IL

In article <78339@ut-emx.uucp> tgunter@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Thomas Gunter) writes:
>Okay, and about Monday's show--CourtMe catchting the bouqet?  This could
>get interesting--if the writers believe in tradition.  And my mom was
>just *sure* that Shannon was going to show up at the wedding--we don't
>have any REAL proof that she's dead.  That shrunken head could have been
>anybody, ya know.

*------------------*

I liked the way that the right after she caught the bouquet, the camera
was on both Andork and GetEven.  Andork was all smiles, and GetEven
looked bored and took a swig from his drink.

Re: Shannon, I too was so *sure* she was going to show up at the
wedding!  I'm still certain she will eventually return and be the
cause for a new plot-line.

-- 
   "Life is inhuman when you are too old to be young." -Bill Nelson
   --------------------------------------------------------------------
  /       Paul Silver          /         Dischord Records            /
 /     pauls@tellabs.com      /    putting the D.C. in harDCore     /
--------------------------------------------------------------------  
   All opinions expressed are strictly my own, unless I stole them.
From: debraa@poof.WV.TEK.COM (Debra Aubrey;685-3679;63-356;;poof)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Do something with that hair!
Date: 31 Aug 92 17:34:11 GMT
Reply-To: debraa@poof.WV.TEK.COM
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tektronix, Inc.,  Wilsonville, OR


In article <28AUG199215225096@albexp.larc.nasa.gov>,
johnson@albexp.larc.nasa.gov (JOHNSON) writes:
|> Forget the hair!  Have you ever seen a more drab dresser in 
|> your life?!  Someone needs to remind her that it's ok to wear 
|> color!


How much input do the actors have into their on-screen wardrobe?

	Debbie.
From: nan@ravel.udel.edu (Nanette Reisor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GH:  Update for Wednesday, 08/26/92
Date: 28 Aug 92 13:29:08 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Delaware

In article <1992Aug28.123350.16162@iti.org> ncj@iti.org (Nancy Jennings) writes:
=>
=>Okay, excuse my ignorance please, but what's the deal with this
=>"money" they have to pay Boobie's convict?  (I've been on vacation
=>for a couple weeks and just kinda skimmed through the thousands of
=>posts when I returned -- I obviously missed something).  I remember
=>seeing something about these guys being stranded on a desert island,
=>while Atkins and some other escapees were on the other side?  I have
=>tried and tried to figure out why Atkins would be blackmailing them
=>-- did he catch them topless sunbathing or something?  
=>

Joseph and Cal Atkins were on the island with the trio. Cal is one of the
three guys who tried to rob Ruby (Jagger was one of them as well). Cal saw
Karen bathing and decided he wanted a closer "look".  Jason and Jagger both
showed up to defend her and in the struggle with Cal, Cal took a tumble over
a cliff. To the best of everyone's knowledge (with the exception of Cal
himself and maybe Joseph) Cal died. Joseph overheard the three of them
discussing how they had killed Cal. 

The primary reason for not going to the police is that Jagger doesn't
believe the police will believe that he was on the boat with Jason and Karen
but will think he had helped Cal escape.



-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                                                       Nanette Reisor
        |\| /-\ |\|                                       CNS/MIS
     nan@brahms.udel.edu                           University of Delaware
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: stapleto@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Kathy Stapleton)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Worse than Carly/Izzy???
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 02:48:30 GMT

In article <78822@ut-emx.uucp> pokey@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Vince Rhee) writes:
>
>	OK, this tremendously-less-than-wonderful storyline with
>	Kimmykins just plain sucks. There, I said it. And no, it's
>	not an original sentiment.
>
>	In fact, this bit is sooooo bad, it's gotten to the point
>	where I would rather watch IzzyB or (gack!) Carly than
>	Kim's stunning portrayal (NOT!) of a disturbed woman.
>	And to be honest, I didn't think the Izz was all that bad
>	today (Monday) -- not great, but definitely not bad.
>	And for me, that's saying a whole lot!
     I agree here with you, Vince....  Kimberly is getting soooo
annoying...  and also....one would think that her family, esp Shane,
would notice that there is something more wrong than just "simple mood
swings"...  Puhleeeeeeeeeeeeze!  And why is it that all characters on
DAYS *always* but *always* have to HIDE things from those that they
"love"...  cause isn't it true if you REALLY love someone, you'd want
to share EVERYTHING?  Including the scary things??????  ARGHHHHHHHHH
(Maybe it's just the fact that I just came home from a random
processes class, but who knows?)

>
>TTFN,
>- V (the 'E' is under repair :-)
>
>                Vince Rhee | But there's booze in the blender

Canty :)
-- 
"Mistletoe can be deadly if you eat it." | Kathy "Loupy" Stapleton
"But a kiss can be deadlier if you       | Dept. of ECE
 mean it."                               | George Mason University
           -- Batman to Catwoman         | stapleto@gmuvax2.gmu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jac@cis.ohio-state.edu (Jim Clausing)
Subject: Re: AW: Kevin
Originator: jac@clarinet.cis.ohio-state.edu
Organization: Ohio State Computer Science
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 19:37:50 GMT

>>>>> On Wed, 2 Sep 1992 14:54:41 GMT, saj@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (john.suravlas) said:
[...]

saj> I'm a little optimistic that he is not the murderer because someone. I'm
saj> sorry I don't remember who, posted meeting with Cass and Cass said that
saj> the cast did not know who the murderer is yet. All this stuff we are
saj> presently seeing was probably taped before Cass' meeting. So there is
saj> some hope that he is not the killer and it's usually not the obvious.

Of course, SOP on these shows is that the one who did it (whatever
'it' is) is never the most obvious choice.  Even just looking back at
AW over the last few years, how many people guessed that Nicole was
the one who shot Jason Frame?  For a while the evidence looked like it
might be Derek.  Then there was the shooting of Jake even more
recently.  Early on I don't remember very many people mentioning
Paulina.  It will probably be someone really off the wall when we
finally find out.  I know that in real life murder investigations can
often take time, but it bothers me when they drag out these murder
mysteries on soaps for months at a time.  Anyone want to take bets on
whether we find out who shot Rick before Christmas?  Well, at least
this isn't three months worth of Cass drugged into a stupor on
Cecile's island hideaway.

saj> If he is not the murderer, it sure would make a complete jerk of Jake
saj> and probably ruin his marriage to Paulina. But, that's OK because they
saj> then could fix Lorna with Jake.

Things with Paulina are going to be rocky anyway.  Him and Lorna won't
happen (though I think it would be interesting).

saj> John
--
Jim Clausing					jac@cis.ohio-state.edu
CIS Dept.					(614)292-4029
Ohio State University			fax:	(614)764-0271
From: dias@milton.u.washington.edu (Vivian Dias)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB - Thoughts
Date: 28 Aug 92 15:25:08 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <1992Aug27.141541.17504@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> 22302LMK@MSU writes:
>Since we are still talking about studs lets add Forry Smith (Reese) to the
>list. I would never have thought of Reese as sexy UNTIL last week's SOM had a
>photo of him in color and no shirt this man has an upper body that could break

  Ah, Lisa, did you not see that wonderful scene in the desert when Cruz
  went to the shaman for some serious soul-searching and took Warren and
  Reese with him?  As Cruz was going into his trance-like state we were
  treated to unbelievable shots of all three of them sans shirts.  It was
  cause for some debate as to who had the nicer of the three physiques.
  As I recall, it once again boiled down to personal choice but Reese
  was definitely in the running.

  Vivian who is impatiently awaiting the next scenes with McCabe...        

>
>
>Lisa-drooling over Conner, Reese, and Ted (only if he's handcuff to a bed in
>speedos.
From: zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: The new Natalie and a TAN (maybe a spoiler for a movie!)
Date: 26 Aug 92 15:02:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: athena.1992Aug26.150249.1073
Organization: MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories

In article <l9l7eeINNarl@male.EBay.Sun.COM> girl@slavery.EBay.Sun.COM (Mary Smith) writes:

>Ok so she had  dress on but I don't think
>that it would stop me from beating him
>with the end of my heels or something!!

Mary, did you see "Single White Female"? :-)

CAZ
From: lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu (Liz Fox)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL -- Miscellaneous Garbage
Date: 26 Aug 92 13:50:27 GMT
Organization: Office of the Dean - CFA, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA



[Vix not Lix]
 
Quincy responds to moi:
 
> Wasn't that something how Drake and Victor conveniently forgot to turn off
> that monitor?  Especially since (sorry, I can't remember which one) looked
> directly at it?
 
I missed that, but I am not surprised.  They are taking two of my favorites,
Victor and Drake and killing them both right along with sIcklyB.  Bleah.
 
Vix
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: saj@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (john.suravlas)
Subject: Re: AW: amanda/grant ** possible spoiler**
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 13:09:11 GMT

In article <9209040612.AA23303@henson.cc.wwu.edu> n8243057@HENSON.CC.WWU.EDU (NSFosberg) writes:
>
>i noticed that amanda was doing the things with grant that she did
>with evan as she led up to leaving sam for evan.  i think they are
>trying out grant with possible female pairings, testing out audience
>response--they probably realize that as little chemistry as jensen has
>with ryan, there is even less with grant...  
>

I think Amanda and Sam are a complete waste. I don't like Brian Green as Sam.
It's time to find a new replacement. he has no chemistry with Sandra
Reinhardt. The last storyline they had for Amanda was when she had an
affair with Evan Bates. I disliked the story so much that I'm carrying
the dislike into Santa Barbara where Charles Grant (Evan) is presently
playing a completely different role. I think Sandra is very attractive
and not a bad actress, but they writers never give her a good story. She
is forever whining. Making Sam a singer is not helping at all.

>ok here's the possible spoiler:
>
>
>
>
>when i was checking out at the grocery the other day, i glanced at the
>SOD, and saw a blurb to the effect that grant and donna are really two
>of a kind, and when donna fails at getting grant to leave vicki alone,
>she decides to try a new way to redirect his attention--to herself.
>now, i've thought for a long time that on a few occasions they have
>played with the idea of pairing up donna and grant, and as much as
>i hate grant, i really think there is better chemistry with them than
>with anyone else and grant.... of course, great actors on AW always
>make the bad ones look better....

I think putting Donna with Grant would make me sick. Is she going to
sleep with all the same men that her daughters have slept with. 
It's a shame they can't give her a decent story.

>
>also, does anyone else think that tommy's dad and iris are a sure bet?
>

I love this story. I hope it doesn't have a sad ending. I think the actor
who is playing Tommy is great. Jensen, Evans and Pinter could take lessons
from him. I like this new Iris. She has a certain warmth about her that
she has never portrayed before. I like it much better that the bitch that
she usually plays. She makes a good bitch, but I love this new Iris. YES,
please team her up with Tommy's father. They are great together.

>and what are they going to do with stephanie? they didn't glamour her
>up just to waste her on cat fights with vicki... and boy has she got
>a mouth on her or what? who'd have thought mousy little stephanie would
>tell vicki where to go?
>

I'm so glad that stephanie let her have it. I had enough of Vickey. They
give her much too much exposure. They should team her up with Grant and
send them off to Siberia forever and ever.

What is this nonsense with John and Lily. Is she going to be his daughter,
lover or both. So far I don't care for this story. If it wasn't for Lorna,
Felicia, Jake, Iris and this future Racheal story AW isn't worth watching.

John
From: pefv702@perv.pe.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL:  Matt Ashford Public Appearance
Date: 3 Sep 92 18:46:10 GMT
Organization: UT Petroleum Engineering Dept.
X-Xxdate: Thu, 3 Sep 92 20:38:02 GMT
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d9

Gail had a follow-up for you, MJ, so I'm posting it.  This is getting a
little complicated.  Kudos to Liz for doing this all the time for our
Smelly sister.  :-)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - begin included text - - - - - - - - - - - - -

In article <1992Sep03.152638.26596@bmerh85.bnr.ca> MJ Heal, mjheal@bnr.ca
writes:
>>
>>      I'm sorry for being somewhat US illiterate, but where IS Valencia?

Sorry, MJ ... my fault for not being more specific in my message to Joanna.
I sort of assumed everybody knew I was in L.A.  Valencia is in the Santa
Clarita Valley just North of L.A. County.  The Sears store is in the new
shopping mall out there (I think).

>>      Thanks for the info Lemon.  Pass that on to Gail now!

She did.  Again, sorry for not being more specific.  But, hey, why don't
you just fly out for the weekend?  The weather's cooled down and it's
pretty nice now.

BTW, I'm not going to Matt's PA, but I will be going to Mary Beth Evans'
play on Sunday (in Beverly Hills).  Thanks, Coleen, for that info.

>>MJ Heal        *        BNR,Ottawa,ON,Canada        *        mjheal@bnr.ca

>Just doing what I'm told!  :-)
>
>Joanna.

And doing a great job!  Thanks (to you and Tim for posting for me until I
gain access again).

        __.        |
       /  |  __. . |
      (__/|/(_/|_|_|__)
         /| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        (_/ Computer Center (CCAD), California State University, Northridge
            18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge, CA 91330    Phone: 818-885-3966
            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

- - - - - - - - - - - - - end included text - - - - - - - - - - - - -

It's my pleasure to help you out, Gail.

Joanna.

| \____ ----- ____/           |  "Let's just be friends -- friends   |
|      ( o o )                |  who never talk or see each other."  |
|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    |      - David Letterman, 7-22-92      |
|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! |           pefv702@perv.pe.utexas.edu |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Y&R 
From: mjk@icf.hrb.com (Michael J. Kelley)
Date: 27 Aug 92 05:31:13 EST
Organization: HRB Systems, Inc.

People are forgetting that only a month or so ago, Lauren and Brad ran into
each other at Gina's. She invited Brad back to her place for a nightcap under
the sheets. She even offered to write an excuse for Brad coming home late. 
Lauren is an impulsive little bitch who doesn't know what the hell she wants. 
Kinda like a female Victor.
 
Scott is still a weenie! 

Neil is too!!

Nina get a clue!!

Your Ryan is a schmoo!!!

Jill Hates Dru!

So what else is new??


                                                              Mike Kelley
                                                              HRB Systems
                                                              St. College, Pa.

###############################################################################
DoD # 645              Go Nittany Lions !!!             Beat The Bearcats!!!
###############################################################################
From: dias@milton.u.washington.edu (Vivian Dias)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB:  More Info from the soap magazines
Date: 1 Sep 92 20:25:02 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Sep1.202502.20034
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <1992Sep1.174820.26380@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> saj@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (john.suravlas) writes:
>
>No, this has never been mentioned on the show. There it is people, McCabe's
>hidden agenda! If he is Reeses' brother, Reese certainly doesn't recognize him.
>He must be a brother that has never received any recognition and is
>determined to destroy Reeses' family. I still can't understand how adamant
>he is to find Frank's murderer. He treated poor BJ, the victim, as a common
>criminal yesterday with no rights by giving her a lie detector test. The
>guy that was killed is pond scum. I wouldn't be surprised if McCabe is the
>murderer. He murdered Frank and tried to blame Sawyer in order to destroy
>his brother's family. Where was McCabe on the night of the murder?

  John, this is all wrong and you know it.  You're just upset that there is
  a very slim chance that Angela may meet McCabe and realize that the man
  of her dreams has finally appeared and that true love is knocking on her
  door :-)
  I don't like the idea of another long, lost brother showing up on someone
  doorstep.  Didn't we just go through this with Rafe and Cruz and then
  nothing ever came of it.  Better McCabe *thinks* Reese is his brother
  and then finds out he isn't.  I still don't think that has any connection
  to the investigation, mainly cuz I want Conner to be a good guy.
>
>I'm reading Kelly with McCabe and Skylar with Kelly. When are the producers
>going to realize that Eileen doesn't work well with anyone!!

  I thought she worked well with Reese.  Now if Reese and Jodie separate
  how about her consoling Reese.  It would leave the road clear for Angela
  and Conner (hee, hee, I've just got to keep throwing these in :-) )

>
>Mccabe with Angela, who looks cute in a pony tail - NO!  NO! NO! NO!
>
>NO!
>    NO!
>        NO!
>           NO!
>
>John

  Angela and Conner sitting in a tree
  K-I-S-S-I-N-G

  Vivian
>
>
From: daveo@hpcvra.cv.hp.com (Dave Ochs)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: Re: AMC: SIBLINGS/AMC
Date: 31 Aug 92 19:01:05 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, OR, USA

>/ hpcvra:rec.arts.tv.soaps / jjdti@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.D.Tilander) /  8:12 am  Aug 28, 1992 /

>Valerie, I think you're recalling Phoebe's sister Peg, who raised Brooke (?)
>and turned out to be evil...my memory is so faint about this, but I seem
>to recall that Brooke was investigating this drug ring or something, and
>the ringleader turned out to be...PEG, who she thought was her mother...
>does anyone else remember this story line?

I only have time for a brief explanation, but yes, I certainly do remember
this story line ... it was on when I first started watching, as most likely
responsible for my addiction :-)  Peg raised Brooke, and Brooke thought she
was her mother.  Brooke's father was dead, and Brooke was investigating
a drug ring, trying to find the head honcho, Cobra.  We kept seeing this 
person ...  a woman ... talking on the phone, but for a long time never saw
a face.  Brooke's mother was also "sick" during this time (crippled too??) 
... I remember a death-bed scene where she says "Goodnight, sweet angel" to 
Brooke, but we the viewers already knew that she was faking it.
Turned out Cobra was Brooke's mom, who imprisoned Brooke (I hope I'm right 
here) when she finally tracked her down.  Of course, Peg wasn't really
Brooke's mother.  She found her real mother during a period I wasn't
watching ... she was a "bag lady."

>Janet

Dave Ochs               "Would you just calm down, you're supposed to be
daveo@cv.hp.com         innocent!"  Edmund to Dimitri, breaking in on
                                    a 'business' meeting at Erica's
From: pokey@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Vince Rhee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL: Worse than Carly/Izzy???
Date: 1 Sep 92 04:37:57 GMT
Organization: 1992-Beat-The-Hell-Outta-Everyone Aggies of Texas A&M


	OK, this tremendously-less-than-wonderful storyline with
	Kimmykins just plain sucks. There, I said it. And no, it's
	not an original sentiment.

	In fact, this bit is sooooo bad, it's gotten to the point
	where I would rather watch IzzyB or (gack!) Carly than
	Kim's stunning portrayal (NOT!) of a disturbed woman.
	And to be honest, I didn't think the Izz was all that bad
	today (Monday) -- not great, but definitely not bad.
	And for me, that's saying a whole lot!

	I mean, geez, that bar scene with the 'mystery redhead'
	(and we know who *that* is!) was almost painful to
	watch, it was so badly done. And that's *before* RoBozoCop
	busted into the place!

	Just thought I'd toss in my spare change...

TTFN,
- V (the 'E' is under repair :-)

                Vince Rhee | But there's booze in the blender
  pokey@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu | And soon it will render
         Department of ECE | That frozen concoction that helps me hang on...
       University of Texas |                                 - Jimmy Buffett
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps