From: vibama@cs.hw.ac.uk (SCOTT DOAN)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Subject: Re: Phu DDo^?ng Thie^n Vu"o"ng {ddoa.n ke^'t}
Date: 7 Apr 92 09:50:23 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh, Scotland

In article <5APR199214490834@rosie.uh.edu> Scott.Doan@Edinburgh.Scotland writes:
>Dear Netters,
>
>After a few articles that DDK have posted recently, I have received some mails


>>Tie^'p tu.c nhe' !!! Sau khi Phu\ DDo^?ng dda'nh tha('ng gia(.c A^n, o^ng
>>lie^\n phi ngu".a le^n ddi?nh nu'i ke^' ca.nh, hi' mo^.t tie^'ng ro^\i
>>phi le^n tro"\i bie^'n ma^'t. Co\n ddoa.n ke^'t cu?a tui thi\ chu"a co'....
>>Tui kho^ng bie^'t la\ tui co' ne^n ho'a phe'p bay ve^\ tro"\i kho^ng ?
>>Tui co\n ddang lu"o"~ng lu". dda^y....?????......
>>
>
>T.Q (if that's what you want to be called!)
>
>Oh, so you thought you have won knock..knock, haven't you!!! (in what???)
>Hmmm!!! no comment!!! (...in public...)

Hi Ngoc. and netters !!! Let's me clarify the relationship between me and Knock
is only an electronic romance !!! We haven't seen each other in reality
but well, did write to each other throught email and nothing more than that !!!
In my humble opinions, there are three different things when we are talking
about love, they are LOVE, ROMANCE and SEXUALITY. Having a romance doesn't
mean you have to love someone though love will need romance to enhance their
feeling. Sexuality is another thing that we shouldn't blindly mix it up
with love and romance. I don't want to make a lot of comments on these
conceptual ideas in this message. From the bottom of my heart, I just want
the netters recognize that, if Knock happens to be romantic then it doesn't
mean she loves someone, and this also applies perfectly well on me.
Therefore, it is up to Knock and the netters to make your own judgement
about my very recent articles . BTW, is it wrong to be romantic ????

Let's go to the next thing. I have known SCV since my undergraduate years
in LONDON but I didn't send any articles until last NOVEMBER( well, after
I got rid of any more examination at University). During November-April,
I got two month interruption with SCV when I was in US and other places
for holiday as well as meetings. So I have been actually with SCV for 3 months
(I mean posting) although I have read SCV from time to time for the last three
years. HONESTLY, I have accquainted a number of MALE netters (well uncountable),
but only THREE FEMALE netters, the first TWO are older than me (one is 26 and
the other 29) and we talked about films, weather and holiday all the time,
there wasn't any joke or poem at all (probably they are not so poetic as Kncok)
Therefore, our email dialogue were interrupted 2 months ago. Could someone
outthere clarify my sincerety, PLEASE ?

Knock is my third email friend, well I very much enjoy wrting to her, you should
know WHY...Hi\...Hi\...Hi\... Do you really hate me Knock ? I hope NOT.
However, you can hate me as much as you like, I won't blame on you ..OK.
I didn't expect I could embarrass you that much in public.  PLEASE accept
my apologies ......, you've already known too well how and why I have
sent those verses on SCV. Hum, if you don't like, I won't repeat it again !!!
If you don't like me writing you anymore, well, I will stop, stop for your
pleasure. 
 
>asking to clarify the relationship between me and DDK (or TQ - if that's what
>he prefers! :-)  And Scott, believe it or not, I am doing this for your own
>benefit because most of these mails have come from *female* netters!! :-))).
>Those netters have wondered if DDK is the one I refer about in my poems.  Of
>course not! (he wish, I know!!! hi` hi`...) Scott nha` ta vu+`a de^~ thu+o+ng,
`u, tu+. kie^u, ho+i ba gai sometimes, -de.p trai, ho.c gio?i, con


Ma.i dzo^...>nha` gia`u, and e^' vo+. ... ne^'u co^ na`o ca?m tha^'y ho+.p (can stand him,
>i mean :-)) xin lie^n la.c vo+'i Scott at ???? (he'll provide that later! :-))
Ne\ Knock !!! Cu"' tha ho^\ ru~a, kho^ng charge you a penny dda^u ? ma.i dzo^>.
>And here is the poem that you have asked for, DDK!!!
>
>In article <1992Apr4.213713.6322@cs.hw.ac.uk>, vibama@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Doan) 
>writes...
>
>>Thu"a ca'c ba.n,
>> 
>>Tui xin ddu"o".c tie^'p tu.c ca^u chuye^.n. DDu'ng ra va\o ca'i lu'c ma\
>>tui ta^'n co^ng Knock...Knock..., tui co\n co' post mo^.t ba\i tho"
>>ddo^'i cho ba\i No^~i Buo^`n DDa^`u Thu cu?a Knock...Knock nu"~a,
>>nhu"ng tui kho^ng co' CC cho tui tha\nh thu"~ ba^y gio"\ tui kho^ng co'
>>dde^? post cho no' complete. Xin lo^~i nghe qui' zi.. Kho^ng bie^'t Knock...
>>Knock... co' post gi\um ddu"o".c kho^ng hi?( Ma^'y ba\i tui post vu"\a ro^\i 
>>la\ tui co' CC cho tui ca?, cu~ng may la('m).
>
>	"Cho ro^`i co' gio^ng co' gia'
>        "Le^n tro+`i ca('n ba ho`n -da'
>        "Xuo^'ng -da^y ta tra? la.i cho !!!" :-))
>
>However, the poem is not really for me anyway.  You (DDK) are just "borrowing"
>my ideas and "-do^'i la.i" only (hi` hi`)... so here it is, netters.
>
>----------Begin Included Message----------
>
>>    		NO^~I BUO^`N DDA^`U THU
>>
>>    Anh da^'u a'i! Tro+`i va`o Thu ro^`i ddo' !
>>    Na('ng hoe va`ng tre^n nhu+~ng bu+o+'c cha^n hoang
>>    DDe^? nho? buo^`n nhu+ co+n gio' lang thang
>>    Vu`ng ye^u da^'u nga`y dda^`u anh quen nho? ...
>> 
>    	Em ye^u da^'u, nho+' mua` Thu na(m ddo',
>    	La' dda~ va`ng tre^n nhu+~ng lo^'i ddi xu+a,
>    	Anh kho^ng dde^? em buo^`n chie^`u Thu a^'y,
>    	Nhu+~ng nga`y dda^`u ddu+o+.c bie^'t dde^'n em ye^u,
>>
>>    Nho? va^~n nho+' con ddu+o+`ng nhie^`u la' ddo^?
>>    Chu? Nha^.t na`o hai ddu+'a ddo'n ddu+a nhau
>>    Tay trong tay chung u+o+'c nguye^.n ban dda^`u
>>    Na`o dda^u bie^'t ti`nh ye^u la` be^? kho^?
>> 
>    	Anh cu~ng nho+' con ddu+o+`ng xu+a nga`y cu~,
>    	Nhu+~ng cuo^'i tua^`n anh va^~n ddo'n ddu+a em,
>    	Ca^`m tay em, anh khe~ tie^'ng nguye^.n ca^`u,
>    	Xin Thu+o+.ng Dde^' ddu+`ng cho la` be^? kho^?
>>
>>    Nho? cha(?ng bie^'t sao ti`nh mi`nh dang do+?
>>    Xa anh ro^`i nho? cho+.t ghe't mua` thu
>>    Cho+.t cho+ vo+ trong buo^?i sa'ng su+o+ng mu`
>>    Cho+.t nho? le^. nhu+~ng la^`n ddo^ng vo^.i dde^'n
>> 
>    	Em ddu+`ng nghi~ ti`nh mi`nh ro^`i dang do+?
>    	Xa em ro^`i anh thu+o+`ng nho+' mua` Thu,
>    	O+? Lua^n Ddo^n thu+o+`ng co' sa'ng su+o+ng mu`,
>    	Anh va^~n nho+' nhu+~ng la^`n em gia^.n do^~i
>>
>>    Va` tu+` ddo' nho? buo^`n ho+n la' u'a
>>    Na('ng u hoa`i, mu+a cu~ng nhuo^'m u+u tu+
>>    O^i! DDa^u ro^`i nhu+^ng na(m tha'ng vo^ tu+ ?
>>    Nho? cho+.t hie^?u mi`nh ma^'t ddi nhie^`u la('m
>> 
>    	Tu+` gia^.n do^~i em thu+o+`ng kho^ng chi.u no'i
>    	Nhu+~ng u buo^`n em a^'p u? trong tim
>    	Dde^? cho anh na(n ni? dde^'n van xin
>    	Anh dda'ng ghe't anh xin em ro^`i ddo'
>>
>>    Con ddu+o+`ng nho? va^~n tra?i da`i tha(m tha(?m
>>    Na('ng loang sa^`u tre^n nhu+^ng ve^'t cha^n hoang,
>>    Tro't ye^u ai cho le^. u+'a ddo^i ha`ng
>>    Kho'c ti`nh nho? hoang ta`n nhu+ xa'c la'...
>> 
>    	Anh co`n nho+' con ddu+o+`ng xu+a na(m cu~
>    	Na('ng va^~n ta`n tre^n nhu+~ng bu+o+'c em ddi
>    	Tro't ye^u em anh cha(?ng bie^'t mong gi`
>    	Xin cu`ng kho'c cho ngu+o+`i ti`nh be' nho? ...
>
>
>DDK
>
>----------End Included Message----------

Mi\nh ggo"?i dde^'n Knock ba\i tho" na\y nhe', kho^ng mu"o".n i' cu?a ai dda^u nha ?.

        Em o+i ddu+`ng co' tra'ch anh,
        Anh ha(`ng tu+o+?ng nho+' nga('m tra(ng tho+? da`i,
        Gio' kia co' vu+o+.t ddu+o+`ng da`i,
        Ddem lo+`i a^u ye^'m cua? ta cho mi`nh

        Tra(ng thu co' to? co' mo+`
        Xin tra(ng la`m chu+'ng cho lo`ng Ddoa`n Lang
        Du` cho co^ng vie^.c xe^'p ha`ng
        Khi na`o la.i lo+~ que^n ngu+o+`i "Ngo.c" kia

        So^ng co' ca.n, nu'i co' mo`n
        Gio' na`o co' tho^?i cho lo`ng nho+' nhung
        Co' ma^y gia(ng o+? kho^ng trung
        Lo`ng ta ha(`ng nho+', ngu+o+`i ti`nh phu+o+ng xa.

        Tha`nh ra lo+~ co' hie^?u nha^`m
        Xin na`ng ddu+`ng tra'ch, ti`nh tha^`m trong ta,
        Dde^? ro^`i ta se~ ha't ca
        Cho na`ng vui khu'c thanh xua^n mo^.t ddo+`i

"Tu+' Tuye^.t" cho ngu+o+`i "buo^`n vu+o+ng ?*" !!!

                Ne^'u na`ng co' "buo^`n vu+o+ng ma`u ao'"
                Ha~y nho+' ra(`ng ta cha(?ng ddu+o+.c vui

                Lua^n Ddo^n tha?m dda.m dde^'n a^u sa^`u
               Co' cha(ng chia se? vo+'i na`ng tho^i


Yours,



T.Q

 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese