HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper)
Subject: K e n--Fundie, or just idiotic?
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 17:32:19 GMT

	It's all so clear now. Garrett Cress has pointed out that K e n
suffers from terminal megalomania. In addition, K e n constantly makes
references to vague "information", although when pressed to provide
information, he waffled and called the request "irrelevant." (Thanks to
Lefty for pointing this out) Further, he states without proof that there
is an Afterlife--no specific mention of Heaven or Hell, although I
suspect that the so-called "misinformed" would not be eligible for his
version of Heaven. (Gee, K e n--wouldn't it get lonely up there all by
yourself?) Given these facts, and his single-minded fanaticism towards
conversion of the "misinformed", leads me to suspect that K e n is
actually a raving fundamentalist of his own narcissistic cult.

	Evidence, K e n! We need more evidence!

Tep
Become "misinformed" and set yourself free!
-- 
I'm too sexy for meiosis.
From: jis@panix.com (Jack Szwergold)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Do Not Read.....
Date: 16 Nov 92 17:42:40 GMT
Organization: Panix, NYC


You wanted to read this?


Well F-U-C-K Y-O-U my man (or woman)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: After much thought,
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:16:24 GMT

In article <kmr4.298.722472494@po.CWRU.edu> kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan) writes:
>
>	I have concluded that K e n is correct. K e n is K e n. K e n can 
>not be smart, as K e n is K e n. If K e n was smart, K e n would not be 
>K e n. Thank you for enlightening us, oh great K e n.

You are making unwarranted extrapolations. K e n is intelligent, for
K e n is K e n.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Date: 17 Nov 1992 16:30:39 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: venture.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <t!6wH#64za@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@cattycorner.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.215335.27051@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>>hey bufalini. how cuome yer always defending k e n? (sorry, i didnt bother 
>>to repost the whole long article with bufalini's pointless one line k e n
>>imitations sprinkled among page after page of quoted text)
>
>I am just pointing out the truth, which Tilden was unable to accomplish.

I was unable to accomplish?  I think you're mistaken, Ken was mistaken, not I.
There was an answer.  I posted the answer, which, I will restate, was life.
I was not to blame for Ken's inadequacy to answer the question so you are wrong.

>
>>do you do this so ken will continue to let your give him rim jobs?
>
>No, I did it to correct Tilden.

I did not ask nor desire your help.  I was arguing with Ken, not you.
You have errored and brought this upon yourself.  I have no forgiveness
for stupidity. Now, I must slander you. 

>
>>are you more like a parrot, or just a mirror? what kind of an asshole
>>are you, anyway?
>
>I am neither a parrot nor a mirror nor an asshole.  Guess again.

No, you're a combination of all three!  You talk nothing but shit and 
admire yourself for it.

>
>-- 
>Bruce A Bufalini <bufalini@.gis.psu.edu>
>"Blame is better to give than receive."  --  Neil Peart, 1980

Then I blame you for the crime of stupidity.

Tilden has spoken
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 02:46:06 GMT

In article <1e8r85INN1oi@venture.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>
>In article <Bxo1vF.ArK@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>
>>K e n does not gamble. Gambling is illegal.
>>
>Thus resting the point I made above. Only one who knows they can not win would respond as such,
>which also proves you are a fraud.  Don't respond to this by saying something like:
>
>    K e n is not a fraud, for K e n is K e n and cannot lie.
>
>It would only prove me correct in my theory.  As to the point of my intelligence, you know nothing
>of how intelligent I am nor are you able to know.

You are indeed misinformed. You seem to be circling around and around
in your circular misinformed logic zone. K e n sees no reason to respond
for K e n realizes that you need serious help. Seek help and then K e n
will inform you of your confused ways.

>>>>>[...] I then pose you this question:  What is that which is
>>>>>eternal in nature, but ends continuously? 
>>>>
>>>>Nothing in nature fits this description.
>>>
>>>WRONG!! There is an answer, therefore your ability to philosophize here is
>>>a fraudulant display of stupidity. 
>>
>>K e n's answer is correct. You have erred once again. Further, you have
>>not given an answer to your question. K e n sees no evidence that suggests
>>that K e n made a mistake. K e n is correct.
>
>The answer is life.  Life is eternal in its nature but is ended by death daily.
>If you had an iota of intelligence, you would have been able to answer correctly,
>but K e n has no intelligence, therefore K e n is a moron.

The answer is not life. Life does not end continuously. It is eternal.
The situation of death is merely a transformation. Your question uses
the phrase "but ends continuously", meaning that something actually ends.
Eternal things, by definition, do not end. K e n's answer is still
correct.

K e n has proven K e n's intelligence, and you sir, have proven
your incompetence and stupidity. Congratulations.

>>>>>I await your answer.
>>>>
>>>>Your answer has been given.
>>>
>>>I think not.  Try again moron.
>>
>>No need to, for K e n is correct.
>
>That is not correct. K e n is incorrect. 

You are misinformed, for K e n is correct.

>>>PS   If you should want a clue as toward the answer to my riddle, e-mail me.
>>>     You have my address.
>>
>>K e n does not require clues, for K e n is correct. You sir, are in dire
>>need of clues.
>>
>K e n does require clues, for K e n was unable to answer.

K e n does not require clues, for K e n was quite capable of giving
the correct answer.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: email from moral majority idiot
Date: 23 Nov 1992 15:18:55 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

WHAT IS THIS, ALT.FUCKING.POLITICS?  i mean, for christ's sake, we
elected CLINTON!! let's just celebrate!  i've been killing file
after file that didn't say anything except RATIONAL POLITICAL
MAINSTREAM BLAHBLAH!  if i wanted rational, i'd go to AUSTRALIA
<*teeheesnicker*>

and who the hell's posting email in here!  boy, that shit STINKS!!!
i don't know what hogaboom did, but i sure hope it was really ugly
and worthless, 'cause you're gonna get a shitload of bad karma for
the big net.etiquette.violation, dude!!

you'd think this was r.m.gd or something, with people actually
posting SOMEBODY'S PRIVATE EMAIL!!!!  what a lousy, stupid thing to
do!

anybody who's stupid enough to email anybody who's ever posted
ANYBODY'S email deserves to die die die die die!!! and i'm a
pacifist ... !

god, i feel better now; a couple more of these and i'll be BACK TO
STAY!!

c'mon, rob, i'm warmed up and ready for ya now (don't forget the
gold card in case you were going to turn this into a double'
entendre'!)  HAVE AT IT!!!!

moi
>>---|>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 03:11:08 GMT

In article <1399@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
>Hmm.  I see.  He said it, but he didn't really mean it; and even

>Bill l

	You are really incredibly dense, aren't you? Have you been paying any
attention? Do you have a special kind of monitor that changes around the
words to say what you want them to?
	It's been pretty much proven, and for that matter admitted, that he
DIDN'T SAY IT! Is that clear enough?

William Everett
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 23 Nov 92 14:59:16 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
: In article <1474@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
: >
: > :
: > : > 
: > : > Oh, Christ- this wallabee-fucking strine geek is fixated on me now.
: > : > Somebody wanna divert him for me, maybe wave a kangaroo dick at him
: > : > or something?  I'll sneak up behind him and untie his shoes, so's
: > : > he falls off the bottom of the planet...
: > : >
: > : Good lord Bill, just which country do you think I come from?
: > : There seem to be too many Australian references in there.
: > : If I was an Austrailian, I wouldn't have any call to flame an
: > : American now would I?  Think about it.
: > : 
: > Oh, yeah- sorry.  Please delete all Aussie references in the
: > previous post and distribute the phrases "Lime-sucker", "public
: > school pederast" and "Brain pudding"  randomly throughout.
: >
: 
: So you want it to look somthing like this then?
: 
: >
: > Oh, Christ- this Lime-sucking strine geek is fixated on me now.
: > Somebody wanna divert him for me, maybe wave a brain pudding at him
: > or something?  I'll sneak up behind him and untie his public school
: > pederast, so's he falls off the bottom of the planet...
: >
: Well, that's not much better, you'll have to think up somthing else
: if you want me to stop rolling about the floor in a fit of laughter
: and get up to do some work for a change.
: 
: 
: -- 
:    _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
:   _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
:  _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
: _/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _

No, that's just fine, Walsh.  I'll let it stand like that.   
Bill   
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar Samant)
Subject: Re: samant babbles
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 06:58:02 GMT


MAC gives me the thrill of a lifetime by actually trying to remember me:

>Tushar...Tushar...no, doesn't ring a bell.

Which is probably why you aren't drooling so much.


>          I went to high school with a girl named Tushar.

You no doubt think, MAC, that this a supremely subtle way of somehow
suggesting that you are past high-school age. Won't wash here, bur.
Face it, everyone knows all about you since I posted your history.

My advice at this moment is to resort to cascading.

Sincerely,
From: kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu (Theodore A. Kaldis)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Two in Hemet
Date: 22 Nov 92 12:58:43 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <16060006@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com> tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:

> There is someplace even stupider...

> Baker, California has on main road that is about a half mile long...

> Along this main avenue in between other small services lie:

> 15 CHINESE FUCKING RESTAURANTS ! ! !...

And a Burger King and a greek diner.

[The losers coming back from Vegas must love Chinese.]
-- 
The views expressed herein are my   ||  Theodore A. Kaldis
my own only.  Do you seriously      ||  kaldis@remus.rutgers.edu
believe that a major university as  ||  {...}!rutgers!remus.rutgers.edu!kaldis
this would hold such views???       ||
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: troll masturbates
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 20:42:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.132144.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:

>*I don't read anybody's stuff unless it is a reply to mine, usually.  Of
>course, the stuff I like reading best is my own, not your digitized excrement.
>If it weren't for your reply, I'd never even recognize your existence, Mr.
>Nobody.

>*You mean I am quite the role model.  Thanx.
>

Oh, troll just LOVES reading his own stuff. He is the kind of
no-life narcissistic asshole who just LOVES to get it all for himself.
Well, troll, if you like your own writing so much why dont you just
write yourself e mail instead of spewing your electronic masturbation
worldwide. really. this kind of thing should be done in private.
look what they did to pee wee for stuff like this....


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Pennsylvania
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 20:46:29 GMT

troll, luckless pennsylvania resident, spews:


>*What's that?  Your school full of West Coast PIGS was so desperate that you
>had to call in a special team of educators from PSU just to teach you to clean
>your own toilets!?!  Geezus, I hope for their sake that you guys at least knew
>how to wipe your own asses *doubtful*!
>
>					Troll of Pa.

Pennsylvania. What a great fucking state. I mean, stretching from the
miserable urban blight of the Philadelphia area, acrosss the boring
Amish interior, through the nuclear wasteland of Three Mile Island, all
the way to the inbred, coal mining mountain areas of western pennsylvania
where studies show that 59% of the populace actually thinks they live
in west virginia, not pennsylvania. god, troll, i wonder how you can flame
australia and then defend pennsylvania. you really are a master debater.
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 15 Nov 92 12:33:03 GMT
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
> In article <kmR3TB12w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
> >weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
> >> In article <XFFZTB6w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes
> >> >At a guess, it beats voting for a mealy-mouthed fascist hypocrite who cla
> >> >atheists can't be US citizens,
> >> 	didn't say this
> >
> >Your denial is singularly unimpressive, as I happen to have the entire quote
> >and a set of references to hand.
[...]
> 	No, I'm not feeling like a Moron. What George bush said is 'I don't 
> know that they should be' which is NOT the same thing as stating that they
> should not be.

Quite.  He might have reconsidered later, and withdrawn the comment about
atheists not being patriots or citizens.  But he didn't.  When questioned
about whether he really meant it, he got the Counsel to the President to
reply, saying that he stood by the comment and that he didn't think atheists
should be considered as patriots or citizens.

But of course, you deleted that bit before following up, slimy weasel that
you are.

Of course, even if that were not the case, does the fact that Bush had slight
doubts make it any better?  Would it be OK for him to say "I don't know that
Jews should be allowed to live" because, hey, he wasn't saying that they
should *definitely* be gassed, right?

> I suggest you take a reading comprehension course before
> you take off on a knee-jerk assumption again.

I'd suggest you read the whole article before flaming it.  You're not fooling
anybody.

>                                                   As for my other 'stupid
> knee-jerk denials' your evidence for them is probably about as impressive
> as this, which is to say- not very.

There's no point my posting anything about the rest of your stupid knee-jerk
denials, as you'd only delete the bits you didn't like, twist as many words
as possible, and deny the rest.

Face it, you and Bush have a lot in common.  You're both slimy and
intellectually dishonest -- assuming, that is, that either of you can validly
be called "intellectually" anything.  Oh, and you're both losers of course.


mathew
[ Going to explain away my .signature? ]
-- 
"Boy, they were big on crematoriums weren't they?"
 -- George Bush, during a tour of Auschwitz, 1987-09-28
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: K e n's Posting Tasks Have Emerged From The Queue (was Re: The evil has just begun...)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 02:53:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.215534.16929@Princeton.EDU> datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
>	Awwww, K e n, come back. I promise that in my future flames I'll
>keep the reading level to second grade or less so you can understand
>them too. I've even got some extra spaces for you...
>
>K                             e                           n
>
>If that doesn't get him to come running, I don't know what
>will. As for Bruce, I'll just say there's nothing more amazing than a
>rubber stamp that types too. Too bad it isn't being put to better use.
>
>	Now is someone going to respond to this, or do I have to flame
>myself _AGAIN_?

K e n did not "run away". K e n had more important tasks to take
care of. The priority of alt.flame posting was significantly lower,
thus it remained several nodes deep in the queue for the past few
days. Must K e n be here all the time to entertain you? You must 
realize that K e n has more important things to take care of.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame,rec.humor
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Subject: Re: Where's K e n?
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:11:52 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <Bxxyzu.KFE@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu
(Kenneth J Robinson) wrote:
> 
> K e n always has information handy whenever it is required...

Say, F'Ken, I need to know the value of Planck's constant in the
furlong/fortnight/hundredweight system.  D'you have _that_ handy?

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper)
Subject: Tep SEZ "_Three_ of them?!!!"
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: P'ton U
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 03:00:31 GMT

	K e n's gone for now, although I have the sneaking suspicion
he'll return like some zombie murderer in a low-budget horror film. I
could deal with that. But the appearance of Leah and Bruce remind me of
those shitty "designer imposter" perfumes you can buy for $.99 at
Woolworth's--and the stench is just as bad.
	Guess my work here is not done. Okay, everyone, repeat after me:
OGGLEs are lame. OGGLEs waste bandwidth. OGGLEs contain no information.
Repeat this mantra three times a day and you too can rid yourself of
those Robinsonian neuroticisms.
	Strange that certain folk found that Beckett story funny. I read
it as a tragic commentary on not just one, but three wasted lives. I
cried myself to sleep that day, thinking of what could have been if
K e n and company weren't so obsessed with the spaces in their names.

	<Moment of silence>

	But we cannot change what is past. And so, let us pass over
these misguided netters and watch those right- and left-extremists flame
each other over I-forgot-what.

Tep
I don't speak for anyone else--they seem to do just fine on their own.
-- 
I'm too sexy for meiosis.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: A question for K E N
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:15:14 GMT

In article <1992Nov22.160613.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>After a lengthy examination of your posts, I have a question K E N, I need to
>become informed. It is to my assumption that your mission here is to inform
>those who have not, or are in the need of, becoming informed. In doing this 
>K E N, it is logical to assume that you represent pure information, as in order
>to be accepted by the uninformed, you must assume a position of omnipotence
>otherwise risk your credibility. It is therefore K E N that you must be
>completely infallible correct? And because of this infallibility, and 
>omnipotence, we, as mere mortals in the face of an all-seeing demi-god, must
>feel only humility when we read your posts, correct? Something tells me K E N
>that there is an error in either your thinking, or mine. Please inform me...

There is no error in K e n's thinking. K e n is not omnipotent. K e n
is K e n. K e n is not a demi-god. K e n is K e n. Your assumptions
are interesting, but you have lead yourself to something which K e n
is not. K e n is impressed with your ability to post one informative
and interesting post. K e n would now like to see two posts.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: esp51@cas.org ()
Subject: Re: Why Bush? (was: Why Clinton)
Organization: Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:18:14 GMT


 (William M. Everett) writes:

>>      The point is that misinformation was posted. Being an advocate of
>>  truth, I mentioned this. Everyone who has attacked me has somehow missed
>> this entirely. Why can't you accept that the original post was wrong and
>> leave it at that?

>Mathew translates:

>"The point is that there was a minor flaw in something I think somebody
>posted.  Being eager to defend my pal George Bush, I seized this flaw and
>proceeded to flame away randomly.  Everyone attacked me for some reason.  Why
>can't you just ignore all the nasty documented evidence which has since been
>posted, and pretend that the whole argument has been refuted by my flame?"

That's obvious.  Looking yet deeper, psychological analysis of Little
Willy's post reveals:

  L. Willy's sacred authority figure G. Bush turns out to be a scum sucking
  felon.  Willy's subsequent identity crises manifests in paranoid
  delusions and emotional stress through which he can no longer
  distinguish between fact and fantasy.  Hoping to preserve some semblance
  of pathetic dignity in the face of overwhelming scorn, he resorts to
  trivial semantic arguements , stubbornly refusing to give up the
  ghost.  (Obvious parallels to Norman Bates character in Psycho I and II,
  substituting dead mother with George Bush's rotting corpse.)

Scott Park
Opinions are mine, I am not company spokesman.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 22:02:05 GMT

In article <By0G9t.6w0@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, bondc@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Clay M. Bond) writes:
> 
>>I suspect you swallow quite well
> 
> Explain this remark.

FELLATIO you stupid fucking moron! 'Blowjob' for your intelligence. "Swish and
spit" .... "Give head". don't even LOOK at alt.flame if you don't understand
the crass humor of the posters.

--The Phantom
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: The Moral Majority is Neither
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:42:08 GMT

i must admit, a discussion about whether pictures of naked 10 year olds
belong on a.p.b.erotica is more interesting than your typical alt.flame
thread. So lets take a little survey, ed anger style:

[ ] Yes, Rob, I agree with you and all the other God-fearing [tm] people
in this country and on this net who say that there is no place for 
pictures of naked 10 year olds ANYWHERE in this great country. i think
perverts who post such pictures should be strung up by their balls.

[ ] No, Rob, I agree with Atheists of America and all the other namby-
pamby liberals who think that ANYTHING, even fucking 10 year olds, is
ok as long as it doesnt represent traditional, fmaily oriented,
christian values.