HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 5 Oct 1992 14:50:57 -0400
From:         "(Ens Alexander W Ellermann)" <ellerman@NORFOLK.NADN.NAVY.MIL>
Subject: Re: Danny Elfman

For those who may be interested:
   Danny Elfman fronts Oingo Boingo, a wildly popular band in
Southern California which has had difficulty breaking into the
national spotlight.  They did "Dead Man's Party" in _Back to
School_ and "Goodbye, Goodbye" in _Bachelor Party_.
   Their (and his) first soundtrack was to _Forbidden Zone_,
a movie by Danny's brother which featured Herve Villaichez as
the Midget King.  It was released on the Varese Zarabanda
label last summer.
    Boingo's first album was a self-titled 4-track EP with a real
garage-band feel.  It's hard to find, but worth the effort.  Their most
recent album, "Dark at the End of the Tunnel," was released by MCA (I think)
a couple of years ago.  It has a smoother sound, but the messages remain vital.
     The band is currently without a contract and is trying to make a deal
with a company who will promote them on a national level.  They play stadiums
in SoCal and (sometimes) small clubs just about everywhere else.
     Fun trick:  listen to "Only a Lad" on the EP, the album w/that name, &
the "Alive" album and notice the increasing subtlety of orchestration.
     Fun quiz:  Big gold star to anyone who can list _all_ the words to "Good-
bye, Goodby."
     Fun fact:  They filmed the classroom scene in _Patriot Games_ in my
building here at the Naval Academy & Harrison Ford came & spoke to my
12-student literary criticism seminar about filmmaking for 45 minutes.  He's
as nice a guy in person as he seems on screen.
     That's all for now from your friendly misplaced Californian,


ellerman
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 2 Oct 1992 19:11:23 EST
From:         "(Steve X. Portigal)" <stevep@SNOWHITE.CIS.UOGUELPH.CA>
Subject:      Re: Parodies of Movies
              S.J." at Oct 2, 92 1:59 pm

dick Clawson, S.J. writes:
>
>     A very recent and very funny parody is an Italian film called the
> "Icicle Thief"  This is an homage/parody of "The Bicycle Thief" which gets
> pretty bizzare as real life merges with movie and television.  I can't
> remember who did this film, can anyone help me out?  I can find out
> shortly, I suppose.   If you can, check it out.

 I think his name was Nichetti...It was pretty funny.

--
/*************************************************************\
|  Steve Portigal  University of Guelph  Guelph, Ontario      |
|  stevep@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca (519) 824-4120 x 3580      |
\*************************************************************/
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 1 Oct 1992 14:16:54 CST
From:         "Dick Clawson, S.J." <CLAWSON@LOYNOVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: GOOD [bad] MOVIES

Jeff Clark recommends BLACK ROBE over DANCES WITH COSTNER'S GRATUITOUS BUTT
and kjf seconds that.

For those not familiar with the history behind BR, it details the journey of
a French Jesuit Priest into Canada to work with tribes of Huron Indians.
As much as I admired the film for it's artistry and breath-taking photography,
I was terribly distressed by the story.
    The author of BR reputedly studied the "Relations"  which is a multi-
volume collection of letters between these North American missionaries and the
Superior General of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits, S.J.'s, Black Robes)  I have
read many of these letters and many of the biographies of the North American
martyrs.  It is disturbing to me that the author could study these works and
then write a not only fictitious, but misleading account of these men and their
work.
      The young Jesuit is painted as being an insensitive clod whose only
concern is baptizing pagans.  True, the Church has specialized in the
redemption of immortal souls in a rather fast and loose style, but this
was not the case with the Hurons.  The movie made it seem that the Missioners
were happiest if the pagans remained blissfully ignorant, whereas in fact
they translated the many prayers into Huron, and were as concerned with
improving the condition of the Indians existence as much as Cathechizing
them.
   What bothered me most was the fact that, although this was supposedly a
positive story about a missionary, the only religious affirmation given was
for the Indian's faith.  If this subject interests you read about it, the film
is distressingly misleading.
Gotta go.
Dick Clawson, S.J.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: cinema-l@auvm.BITNET
X-VMS-To: BITNET%"cinema-l@auvm"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 28 Sep 1992 12:30:01 -0500
From:         FAC_JCLARK@JMUVAX.BITNET
Subject:      BATMAN & CYRANO scores...

Scott, I just checked and maybe I misread your allusion defensively the
wrong way: CYRANO was released in 1990, BATMAN in 1989, so the inspiration
or whatever might've worked the other way.  My feelings are otherwise still
the same: depends on what a composer may do with his cribs (just pastiche,
or something more?), if he did crib at all.

While I'm at it, one further note on the "diversity" of Elfman's movie music,
since I've noticed comments that seem to view it as lacking.  In my view,
one shouldn't mistake charactistic instrumental color, texture and even volume
of a particular set of prominent scores--say, the cartoon character scores for
DICK TRACY and the BATMANs--for sameness.  Some of this character is identiable
in the less-full-blown orchestral BEETLEJUICE.  But even "similar" scores for,
say, DARKMAN and NIGHTBREED are not really.  They are completely different in
mood, appropriate to their respective films, and I could hardly imagine DARKMAN
's score tacked onto BATMAN.  Among other things, it's a clever adaptation (er,
translation?) of the feel and flowing form of old Universal horror movie scores.
   And there's of course an effort like MIDNIGHT RUN--done in the "style" of tho
   se
movie scores for road-type films that travel you through a variety of musical
genres (C&W, R&B, etc) ringing variations on a tune in the process.  But here
it's done with *definitive* imagination.  The bluesy main theme really mirrors
the emotional and actional (some word, huh?) course of the film, DeNiro's
character in particular: as Grodin's says, "You've got only two states--silence
and rage" (or something similar).  The theme swells and subsides like that.
But beyond this, an examination of the whole score shows that throughout about
75% of the film music he builds it on two musical bits: a three-note figure,
and a four-note descending phrase.  These things are used to build both the
tunes and the rhythmic riffs under them; also, Elfman actually composed more
than one tune out of them--not just variations on the same tune. The recombinant
   imagination I hear in Oingo Boingo is at full tilt here spread out over the
length of a film.  But I've heard that score independent of the film many more
times than I've viewed the picture, which I like a great deal, too.

Elfman's main "sound" may change over time, but you can also achieve diversity
even within that identity.  I think he has, *and* he's gone outside of it on
occasion, too.  Jeff Clark
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 28 Sep 1992 10:26:08 EDT
From:         Gayle Williams <GWILLIAM@UGA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Suggestions needed

On Wed, 23 Sep 1992 13:35:00 PST <THOMPSON@UCRVMS> said:
>The designer of a college humanities course is looking for films
>set in the 1820s and 1830s, particularly films dealing with
>social changes, slavery, women's issues, the opening of the west,
>and changes in Americans' self-concept.  I can't think of ANY
>films set in those decades; can anyone help???
>
>Jim Thompson

Jim--Any luck with this question?  It's a toughie!  I did remember a TV mini-
series done on NBC around 1976 but I can't remember its name.  It starred
Elizabeth Montgomery and Hal Holbrook regarding "western" expansion into
Ohio or Kentucky in what I think was the post-revolutionary period.  It
follows the characters from being young to old and I think in that scope,
it does raise the question of being American and expanding the US from the
original colonies.  (Holbrook's character hailed from Boston).  Good luck.
Gayle Williams
University of Georgia Libraries
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:59:38 BST
From:         "(John Smyth)" <eeijsh@EEIUC.ERICSSON.SE>
Subject:      UNFORGIVEN

SPOILER........

















 I noticed the film was dedicated to Sergio and
Don...obviously Sergio is Sergio Leone director of all those spaghetti
westerns Clint was in. Who is Don?


I think Don refers to Don Seigal, who directed 'Dirty Harry'.

>   to me, that was the WHOLE POINT of the film. clint has made enough
>westerns in his time, he wanted to make a movie that wasn't so black and
>white, where your feelings weren't fed to you, where it wasn't clear enough
>to everyone what they were supposed to think and feel. I found this challenging
>and I guess more realistic. the idea of the anti-hero, maybe taken a little
>further.


I agree with you completely. I particularly liked the way the victim was carried
along by events without having any control. When she is offered the pony by the
younger cowboy (who seems to show genuine remorse) she seems to want to accept
 the
offering, but the other prostitutes don't allow it. She doesn't really want the
two men killed either, IMO.

                                John Smyth
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
From: MKERBEL@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (Michael)
Subject: Re: Good [BAD] Movies
Organization: Yale University
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 14:24:55 EDT

Respected movies that aren't that good: I would vote for MOST of the Oscar-
winners, going back to the beginning.  But instead of listing all of them, I
will stick with the last twenty years:
 
1973 -- THE STING (nice entertainment but Best Picture?  Also, it is sexist)
1975 -- ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST (Nicholson at his best.  But the film
        is highly schematic and simplistic, and EXTREMELY sexist)
1976 -- ROCKY (trite, unbelievable, sexist)
1978 -- THE DEER HUNTER (pretentious, overblown, confused, sexist)
1979 -- KRAMER VS. KRAMER (Good acting, but banal and sexist)
1980 -- ORDINARY PEOPLE (pretentious, sexist)
1981 -- CHARIOTS OF FIRE (Rocky with a British accent)
1982 -- GHANDI (pompous, stiff, LONG)
1983 -- TERMS OF ENDEARMENT (it wasn't even good at the time)
1984 -- AMADEUS (what's the point?)
1985 -- OUT OF AFRICA (pretentious, aimless, Redford without a <needed>
        British accent)
1986 -- PLATOON (Unless you like being hit over the head with a sledgehammer)
1987 -- THE LAST EMPEROR (What is this about?)
1988 -- RAINMAN (Hoffman and Cruise are great, but a VERY patronizing film.
        Also sexist)
1989 -- DRIVING MISS DAISY (patronizing and very ordinary)
1990 -- SILENCE OF THE LAMBS (admittedly, quite different from most of these
        others, but still overrated psychobabble.  Definitely NOT sexist, I
        think.  But homophobic.  Also, made me want to vomit)
 
Of Oscar winners in the past 20 years, this leaves: THE GODFATHER (1972),
THE GODFATHER II (1974), both of which I am sure plenty of people find
overrated, but which I still think constitute a great American popular epic;
ANNIE HALL (1977), which has certainly dated, but which is still something
of a landmark.
 
I won't even go into such Best Picture winners of the past as AROUND THE WORLD
IN 80 DAYS (1956), THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH (1952), A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS
(1966), IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT (1967 -- the year of BONNIE AND CLYDE and THE
GRADUATE), OLIVER (1968), and, hold onto your hats, THE SOUND OF MUSIC (1965).
From: ELGFROEHRER@PSUCES.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Subject: Re: a question
Date: 6 Oct 92 20:42:00 GMT
Reply-To: ELGFROEHRER@PSUCES.BITNET
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Organization: Penn State University / CES & CE
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was ELGFROEHRER@PSULIAS


                  I N T E R O F F I C E   M E M O R A N D U M

                                        Date:     06-Oct-1992 03:41pm DST
                                        From:     Ellen L. Gfroehrer
                                                  ELGFROEHRER
                                        Dept:     Independent Learning
                                        Tel No:   (814) 865-5403

TO:  VMSMail User _IN%"CINEMA-L           ( _IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET" )

CC:  _AUVM.BITNET"::IN%"AFCOLYER@PSULIAS.BITNET"
CC:  _AUVM.BITNET":: IN%"ELGFROEHRER@PSULIAS.BITNET"
CC:  _AUVM.BITNET":: IN%"TJMCKENNA@PSULIAS.BITNET"

Subject: RE: a question

Paul:

Was that the one with Donovan Leitch (son of Donovan) in the starring role?

Ellen
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 28 Sep 1992 15:16:00 CDT
From:         Becky Albitz 5-5931 <CADALBTS@UIAMVS.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Good [BAD] Movies

Carol, I agree with you 100%!  I found "Terms of Endearment" contrived
and boring!  Just proves that the academy awards are not based on
merit, but on politics.

Becky Albitz
University of Iowa Libraries

> We have had comments on the worst, z-grade, b movies on this list.  Howe
> about movies that made it big, oscar winners or critically aclaimed, that
> you thought were over-rated or hated?
>
> For example, I did not like _Terms of Endearment_, although it won Oscars
> (much to my dismay) and critical praise.  I thought it was contrived, I
> didn't care much for the characters and why were at it lets give the
> daughter a terminal illness (shades of _Love Story_). IMHO.
>
> Other takers in the suppose to be Great Movie category?
>
> Carol Doms
> University of Missouri-Kansas City
> cdoms@umkcvax1
> cdoms@vax1.umkc.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 29 Sep 1992 20:06:41 EST
From:         "(Steve X. Portigal)" <stevep@SNOWHITE.CIS.UOGUELPH.CA>
Subject:      Re: Last of the Mohicans
              Gleason" at Sep 29, 92 3:32 pm

Gayle Gleason writes:
>
> >
> >Last of the Mohicans
> >
> >Is Michael Mann the director responsible for Manhunter and Miami Vice ?
> >
> >    John Smyth
>
>   Yes to the Miami Vice part of that question, I don't know about Manhunter.
 Yes, Manhunter, and also Thief (with James Caan)

--
/*************************************************************\
|  Steve Portigal  University of Guelph  Guelph, Ontario      |
|  stevep@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca (519) 824-4120 x 3580      |
\*************************************************************/
From: cmurrell@ACS.UCALGARY.CA
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Subject: Re: Blow-Up, Antonioni
Date: 29 Sep 92 16:47:36 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11s]
              Sep 27, 92 11:19 pm

Rick -
There's a bibliography on Blow-Up in The International Dictionary
of Films and Filmmakers, vol. 1: Films, the 1990 edition.  Two
items in it which look as though they might be of special
interest to you are:
Samuels, Charles. "Blow-up: sorting things out"  in America
Scholar, Winter, 1967-68.

Slover, George. "Blow-up: medium, message and make-believe"  in
Massachusetts Review, Autumn, 1968.

Hope this is of help.

Cindy Murrell
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Organization: Penn State University / CES & CE
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 30 Sep 1992 14:13:00 EST
Reply-To:     WKCOVINGTON@PSUCES.BITNET
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was WKCOVINGTON@PSULIAS
From:         WKCOVINGTON@PSUCES.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Return of Martin Guerre

                  I N T E R O F F I C E   M E M O R A N D U M

                                        Date:     30-Sep-1992 02:08pm DST
                                        From:     Will K. Covington
                                                  WKCOVINGTON
                                        Dept:     Audio Visual Services
                                        Tel No:

TO:  VMSMail User _IN%"CINEMA-L           ( _IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET" )


Subject: RE: Return of Martin Guerre

Becky:

Bowker's Complete Video Directory 1992 lists Nelson Entertainment, Inc. as
source for VHS copy of The Return of Martin Guerre. Order#:  1304. Price is
listed as $29.98. Their address is 335 N. Maple Dr., Suite 350, Beverly Hills,
CA  902109-3899.  Their phone number is 213-285-6000.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: cinema-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"cinema-L@auvm.bitnet"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Sat, 3 Oct 1992 15:41:59 -0400
From:         JGADSDEN@SMITH.BITNET
Subject:      a funny thing happened in Northampton, (MA)

Hey everyone,
It has been an interesting two weeks in Northampton.  Castle Rock Entertainment
has been filming a movie here at Smith College.  It's a thriller that takes
place at a fictitious New England (Westerly) college.  The movie stars, Alec
Baldwin, Nicole Kidman, and Geena Davis.  I and my friends have been fortunate
enough to meet the above minus GDavis.  Also Tom Cruise is in town.  We all
have pictures with the stars, and many extras have been chosen from the
students here.  Today was their last filming day, so I guess they'll be leaving
soon.  It was certainly very fun while it lasted.
Jessica Gadsden
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 5 Oct 1992 10:41:27 CST
From:         "Dick Clawson, S.J." <CLAWSON@LOYNOVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Flat fish
              4 Oct 1992 23:07:52 -0400 from <MDESCHUYTENE@SBCCMAIL>

Michel writes:

>     I have enjoyed preformances by Natasha Richardson, Bob Hoskins, Jeff
>     Goldblum and Michel Blanc enough to be intrigued by the prospect of
>     having them all together in the same movie. Unfortunately, THE FAVOR,
>     THE WATCH AND THE VERY BIG FISH turned out to be quite disappointing.
>     It has some funny moments but the whole thing neer quite gels.  And the
>     very big fish turns out to have a very small part.

I would agree with most of Michel's assessment.  I was dissapointed with the
whole of this film, but there are some individual scenes that are violently
funny.  I would rec. this film, but first warn whomever that it's strength
lay in the parts rather than the whole.
RDC,SJ
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 30 Sep 1992 10:08:24 EDT
From:         "ZARATHUSTRA" <oriordan_w@CSVAX1.UCC.IE>
Subject:      RE: Last of the Mohicans

As far as I know Micheal Mann did direct Manhunter.
                                           Colm
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 6 Oct 1992 17:24:11 -0400
From:         "(Jay Swartz)" <swartz@OYSTER.SMCM.EDU>
Subject:      Fisher King quote

Help me, please!

At one point in _The Fisher King_, Robin Williams makes a comment
to Amanda Plummer about "trash literature."  It's when they're walking
down the sidewalk, and he makes the small chair from a piece of wire.
Anyway, I would appreiciate if anyone who knows (or can get) the quote
could e-mail it to me.  I need it for my Senior English class--we're all
supposed to read a "trash" novel.  I think I'm going to read _Romeo and
Juliet_ to make a point.  The quote will help.

Thanks in advance,

Jay Swartz
St. Mary's College of Maryland
swartz@oyster.smcm.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 5 Oct 1992 12:06:30 -0500
From:         JACKSOSM@VUCTRVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: GOOD [bad] MOVIES

>   I am undoubtedly biased.  I suppose that I wanted a North American version
>of THE MISSION, but I still can't help feeling that BR fell short of the mark
>when compared to history.  ESPECIALLY the little tag at the end that tells how
>the peaceful Hurons were slaughtered x-many years laters by another tribe.  It
>left a distinct impression in my mind that the author wished to blame the
>influence of the missionaries on their defeat...
>RDC,SJ

Richard,
  Not to initiate a socio-historical debate on a list devoted to cinema,
but given the assumptions of the film, isn't it reasonable to conclude
that the conversion to Christianity by the Hurons might have contributed
to their defeat by tribes less sensitive to a morality whose basic
premise advocates "turning one's cheek" in the face of aggression.

j-man
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 2 Oct 1992 14:06:52 CDT
From:         C444307@MIZZOU1.BITNET
Subject:      Re: GOOD [bad] MOVIES

>Jeff Clark recommends BLACK ROBE over DANCES WITH COSTNER'S GRATUITOUS BUTT
>and kjf seconds that.
>
>For those not familiar with the history behind BR, it details the journey of
>a French Jesuit Priest into Canada to work with tribes of Huron Indians.
>As much as I admired the film for it's artistry and breath-taking photography,
>I was terribly distressed by the story.
>    The author of BR reputedly studied the "Relations"  which is a multi-
>volume collection of letters between these North American missionaries and the
>Superior General of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits, S.J.'s, Black Robes)  I have
>read many of these letters and many of the biographies of the North American
>martyrs.  It is disturbing to me that the author could study these works and
>then write a not only fictitious, but misleading account of these men and their
>work.
>      The young Jesuit is painted as being an insensitive clod whose only
>concern is baptizing pagans.  True, the Church has specialized in the
>redemption of immortal souls in a rather fast and loose style, but this
>was not the case with the Hurons.  The movie made it seem that the Missioners
>were happiest if the pagans remained blissfully ignorant, whereas in fact
>they translated the many prayers into Huron, and were as concerned with
>improving the condition of the Indians existence as much as Cathechizing
>them.
>   What bothered me most was the fact that, although this was supposedly a
>positive story about a missionary, the only religious affirmation given was
>for the Indian's faith.  If this subject interests you read about it, the film
>is distressingly misleading.
>Gotta go.
>Dick Clawson, S.J.
>
Well Dick you are not alone, a good friend of mine (also a Jesuit)
felt the same way.  I can see the above points as very thought provoking.
However, my friend also admitted to wondereding how biased
he was in his feelings toward the movie.  Unfortunately,
I do not have enough knowledge to comment on the validity
(or lack thereof) of the movie's depiction of the missionaries'
intentions.

Seeya

Joe Daus   U of MO-Columbia
C444307@MIZZOU1.BITNET
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 5 Oct 1992 13:49:57 EDT
From:         Gayle Gleason <ST402486@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: THE COMMITMENTS

The Commitments have a second record (or CD, whatever) out called
 The Commitments, vol. 2 (I think).  More great Motown!

--Gayle Gleason