HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gt@prosun.first.gmd.de (Gerd Truschinski)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: DMA Speed For Adaptec 1542B SCSI
Date: 20 Nov 92 17:01:22 GMT
Followup-To: comp.periphs.scsi
Organization: GMD Berlin (FIRST)

In article <1992Nov16.163442.16817@adaptx1.UUCP>, neese@adaptx1.UUCP (Roy Neese) writes:
|> In article <BxL4rr.Grp@sti.com> westes@sti.com (Will Estes) writes:
|> > According to my 1542B manual, you can set the default DMA transfer speed
|> > between 5 and 8 MB/s.  What's the fastest that you can safely set this
|> > to on an ISA machine?  In an AMI BIOS, what are the clock/timer settings
|> > that affect DMA speeds?
|> 
|> There is no way to know what the fastest DMA setting can be for an ISA
|> bus based machine.  You have to try out the different DMA settings to
|> find out what the machine will reliably support.
|> Try moving the jumper to 5.7 and then 6.7 and so on and so forth until
|> the machine either locaks up or starts acting flaky.  You best have a
|> backup of the data on the hard disk before starting this preocedure.
|> You can also try using the ROM BIOS test routine located at dc00:9.  It
|> will not be 100%, but it will show catastrophic problems with various
|> DMA speeds.
|> This is not a limitation of the 154x adapter, it is a limitation of the
|> ISA bus, where there is no real control logic for bus masters.
|> ---

Last month I read, that there are boards, wich run with the jumpers set to 10
on a 486 board. 

/gT/


|> 
|> 			Roy Neese
|> 			Adaptec Senior UNIX/SCSI Software Engineer
|> 			UUCP:	convex!egsner!adaptex!neese
|> 			Inet:	neese%adaptex@cirr.com
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: kemp@convex.com (Phil Kemp)
Subject: dv/x hangs with 1522
Summary: dv/x hangs when adaptec 1522 is installed
Keywords: 1522 scsi adaptec dv/x
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:09:34 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

I just installed a SyQuest 88 meg removable on an Adaptec 1522 scsi
card. I have the bios disabled and the i/o port does not conflict with
anything else in the system.

DOS and Windoze have no problem with this setup. As soon as I try DV/X
and try to do anything within a dos window the system hangs. As soon
as I comment out the aspi drivers everything starts to work. I've
tried excluding the bios even though it's disabled. I've tried loading
the drivers high and low, with and without stealth. Nothing seems to
work.

Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks.
PK

--
Phil Kemp			Voice:(214)-497-4671
CONVEX Computer Corporation
Richardson, Texas		Internet:kemp@convex.com

Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: gibson@b11.b11.ingr.com (Stanley)
Subject: Re: 1 GB 3.5" SCSI disks
Reply-To: gibson@b11.b11.ingr.com (Stanley)
Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:50:53 GMT

In article <OD.6badnetOA92-901-302p0_53b52437@piraya.bad.se> Roger_Nordin@atb.bbs.bad.se (Roger Nordin) writes:
snip
test results from DEC DSP3105
snip
 
>> This is curious. The DEC DSP3105 is not a "zoned" disk drive. The
>> data rate is constant regardless of where you are on the disk.
>> The sustained transfer rate (57 sec/track * 512 bytes per sector * 90rps)
>> is 2.6MB/sec. The 2.2MB/sec you see is reasonable. The 3.1 is not. I
>> suspect disk or system cache is responsible for the "inflated"
>> value.
>
>If a cache had been involved, would the "CPU Available" not have showed lower 
>figures? Software caches always eats a lot CPU time when reaching from the 
>cache, since that is a 100% dependant CPU operation itself.
You are probably right on that. The cacheing must be taking place on
the disk itself. The little beast has a 512KB buffer!
>
>I don't have the data for the DSP3105 disk (actually, I just popped in here), 
>but if the subject line is still correct, then we are talking about 1Gb sized 
>harddisks. Now, 1Gb 3.5" without zone recording?! Why waste so much disk space?
>Wouldn't it make the disk more unreliable, if it's not adapting the data 
>stored on each cylinder to the size (and thus density) of the cylinder itself? 
>You'd be pushing the inner cylinders to the limits, while the outermost would 
>not be used even to half their capacity.

Yes a 1.0GB 3.5 inch disk WITHOUT zones. I looked very closely at
this drive and a handful of other this year. The 3.5 inch 1.xGB DEC
and IBM drives are not zoned. As for reliability DEC has a hugh 264
bit ECC and multiple copies (4?) of the header. It would seem very
unlikely for you to not retrieve your data off ths drive.

Wasted disk space? Gracious goodness how much disk space do you WANT on
your 3.5 incher??
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: drkhoe@nmt.edu (ONID)
Subject: Survey - Research
Organization: New Mexico Tech
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 03:13:47 GMT

                              QUESTIONNAIRE
                         TO EXAMINE CAFFEINE USE
                        AMONG COMPUTER SCIENTISTS
                         AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS
                                     
Most of us enjoy consuming caffeine in one form or another. The purpose of
this questionnaire is to examine how much caffeine is being consumed, what
form the caffeine is being consumed in, and who is consuming it.

Please answer these questions with email to: bob@jupiter.nmt.edu
with the subject 'survey'.

**Please do not post your answers, that will waste bandwidth**

You don't have to quote the whole article, just use 6 lines or so:
EXAMPLE
	1 CS
	2 85 cans
	3 Jolt
	4 5 pots
	5 none (gives me a headache)
	6 45 Vivarin/hr.

Thank you!

1. What is your field of work/study?
    EE       CS        BothNeither

2. How much soda do you consume per day (average)?
    ________

3. What kind of soda do you drink?
    ________

4. How much coffee do you consume per day (average)?
    ________

5. How much tea?
    ________

6. Do you take any caffeinated pills? If so, how many?
    Vivarin  NoDoze    Maximum Strength Excedrin
    ______   ______    ______

bob@jupiter.nmt.edu
Bob "Chunkstyle" Broilo
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amiga to the Bone | SF2 Fanatics: Can you hang with the Guile combo's?
Moshing - the number one dance in America.  Kill the preacher hang the pope.
-------------------------------drkhoe@nmt.edu-------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: John Hansen <JOHN_HANSEN@MAC.SAS.COM>
Subject: best (read as least troublesome) CD-ROM Drive for Adaptec 1542b
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d9
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:12:10 GMT
X-Xxdate: Fri, 20 Nov 92 17:14:30 GMT
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A732872680010515@bigjohn.mac.sas.com>
Organization: SAS Institute, Inc.

I am on a quest. Looking for anyones comments on which CR-ROM drive is the
least troublesome as far as installation\compatability etc. I have an
Adaptec
1542b on a 486 ISA system but also have a MAC IICX that I want to attach
this
CD-ROM drive. I have been leaning toward the NEC CDR-74 which appears
quite
fast (in relative terms) and can be used on both the MAC and PC systems.
Any and all comments appreciated.
From: thomasp@csufres.CSUFresno.EDU (Thomas Pearson)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Subject: THIS IS ONLY A TESTmore mbox
Date: 21 Nov 1992 00:34:37 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


This is ONLY A TEST.

SO DON'T READ ANY MORE OF IT!!!!!!!!!!

/****************************************************************************\
* Thomas Pearson                     |Internet:                              *
* California State University, Fresno|thomasp@csufres.CSUFresno.EDU          *
\****************************************************************************/
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: douin@cnam.cnam.fr (Douin Jean Michel)
Subject: SCSI & Eproms
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:56:42 +0100
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA11069; Tue, 17 Nov 92 06:56:45 -0800
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA06225; Tue, 17 Nov 92 06:56:39 -0800
X-Received: from cnam.cnam.fr ([163.173.128.6]) by chenas.inria.fr (5.65c8d/92.02.29)
	via Fnet-EUnet id AA29807; Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:56:25 +0100 (MET)
X-Received: by cnam.cnam.fr id AA21356
  (5.65c+/IDA-1.4.4 for comp.periphs.scsi.usenet@decwrl.dec.com); Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:56:42 +0100
X-To: comp.periphs.scsi.usenet

Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: SCSI and EPROM
Date: 
Organization: 

Hi,

Do you know a card with 20 Mo or less on a card at standard SCSI ?

Thanks for your help.


-- 
Jean-michel Douin (douin@cnam.cnam.fr)
C.N.A.M./A.S.I
2, rue Conte
75003 Paris
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: herbert@crunch.ikp.physik.th-darmstadt.de (Tobias Herbert)
Subject: Novell 3.11 driver for BusTek BT742 A EISA Controller
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 18:56:53 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: TH Darmstadt

Does anybody know an working Novell 3.11 driver for
BusTek BT742A SCSI EISA controller.
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: det@hawkmoon.mn.org (Derek Terveer)
Subject: Re: what to optimize with DAT drives?
Organization: Demi-Public System (One of the Eternal Champions); Eagan, MN, 55123-2507, USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 20:29:32 GMT

In article <9850053@hpcpbla.bri.hp.com>, mark@hpcpbla.bri.hp.com (Mark Simms) writes...
>DAT drives will wear out faster if they do not stream.  The main
>failures are due to actual tape pulling time which affects head wear,
>repositions which affects wear in the tape pulling mechanism and
>tapeloading which affects wear in the tape load mechanism.  If the
>tape does not stream, then this rapidly becomes the dominant factor.

I would think that this would also affect 8mm drives as well???

derek
-- 
Derek Terveer   Work:	derekt@stpaul.gov	+1 612 292 6009
		Play:	det@hawkmoon.mn.org	+1 612 683 0413
"Big business and big government distract us with entertainment;
 they manufacture our consent while we destroy the environment."
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: jps@netcom.com (John Serafin)
Subject: Re: CorelSCSI Woes....
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 06:29:29 GMT

davei@comp.lancs.ac.uk (Mr D Ingles) writes:

>In article <1992Nov16.153442.23724@nwnexus.WA.COM> jsanchez@halcyon.com (Jim Sanchez) writes:
>>I too have had my share of problems with the CorelSCSI package.

>Is it true that CorelSCSI is now bundled free with the Adaptec 1542b SCSI
>controller ?

The package which bundles CorelSCSI with the Adaptec 1542b costs about US$60
more than the "kit" package.

>Davei
-- 
John P. Serafin  |  Operating a bicycle is more like driving than riding.
jps@netcom.com   |  Operating an automobile is more like riding than driving.
From: mikey@cs.mcgill.ca (Richard LionHeart)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: CD-ROM drive questions
Keywords: cd-rom, cd, rom, questions, texel, ncr, toshiba
Date: 23 Nov 92 02:03:13 GMT
Organization: Tessier-Ashpool monitor, Maas-Neotek Corp


Let's see, to start, I'm using a 1542b + Texel 3024....I'll comment 
as I go.


>>>
* darkwing@cis.umassd.edu (Curtis H. Wilbar Jr.) Has heretofor espoused:
*
>I will be using DOS/WINDOWS/OS2/some unix at some point...

Currently running with Weendoes for DOS and Weendoes NT. 
BSD386 only supports the Adaptec SCSI adapter, last I heard. 

Everythings fine, except I get strange timeout/bus locks with NT. Anyone 
know anything about this? Loss of CurPos, and other neat errors? The
disks work fine (Conner 3200F, Fujitsu 2614S) 


>
>I have a 1542B host adapter.... (what are the newest ROM versions anyway ?)

Don't know...

>
>Well, I want to purchase a unit soon, but want to but a good unit at a
>good price....
>
>I currently can get a Toshiba XM3301A for $399 internal, $450 external,
>NEC CDR-84 internal $519, external $579
>Toshiba XM3301B $409 internal
>Texel DM3021 $339 internal, $419 external
>Texel DM3024 $439 internal, $549 external

Hmm, sounds like DC drives to me, for the Texel.
>
>The Texel DM3024 looks like the fastest from the info I have been able to
>gather so far (265ms, 300K xfer)...
>
>Are there any units I'm missing here.... (in the $600 and under price range)
>that are similar or better than the above units ?
>
>One thing I don't find on any of them is the warranty length ?
>
>NEC claims to be 'fastest' with their multispin.... (CDR-84 above is a
>multi spin unit)..... is if faster than the Texel ?

I went looking for a while, the best thing I found was the Texel.
The NEC is 280ms, 300KB xfer, so the Texel is faster -- It was designed
as a "NEC KILLER". -- Caution about the NEC make sure they have it.
One really Slimy Arizona company with big ads in all the magazines sold 
me one, and then two months later cancelled my order, "Oh, we don't have
the contract yet, we thought we were going to have it in Aug" -- And
they told me they had it in stock.

Similar experiences? 

Anyone have the same problems with NT? --Solutions? Drive and Controller 
are in default state, expcept for SCSI ID. --Mail me on the NT thang.


					-mikey
-- 

|mikey@cs.mcgill.ca           -Mike Gallop-      	      McGill Comp Sci |
|	               	Life is Short, Play Hard			      |
/dev/brain: Reality Check Failed..Can't mount root...Aborting...Too much Work!
From: tholo@amanda.bbb.no (Thorsten Lockert)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Updated version of ASPITAR (aspi.c) to handle ASPIEDOS / AHA1740?
Date: 18 Nov 1992 14:17:35 +0100
Organization: Bergen By Byte A/S
NNTP-Posting-Host: amanda.bbb.no
Summary: ASPITAR doesn't work with HP DAT streamer
Keywords: DAT ASPI SCSI ASPITAR TAR AHA1740

Does anyone have an updated version of aspi.c for ASPITAR that will work
correctly with the combination HP DAT model 35470A on an AHA1740 with
ASPIEDOS.SYS?  I keep getting under/overflow messages on ALL read/write
calls, as well as the SCSI inquiry command (when running ASPI.C in test
mode).

Thanks in advance,
  Thorsten
-- 
Thorsten Lockert       |  postmaster@bbb.no  |
Ibsensgate 122         |  hostmaster@bbb.no  |  Universe, n.:
N-5037 Solheimsviken   |  tholo@bbb.no       |          The problem.
Norway                 |                     |
Xref: sparky comp.periphs.scsi:5467 comp.os.os2.misc:36593
From: aaronw@si.ucsc.edu (Aaron M. Williams)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Adaptec 1542B at different address (in OS/2)
Date: 15 Nov 92 16:05:25
Organization: UCSC - Slug Club
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu
In-reply-to: ashah@eos.ncsu.edu)'s message of 15 Nov 92 21:33:45 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.213345.8223@ncsu.edu> ashah@eos.ncsu.edu) (the ciool dude ;-) writes:
Path: darkstar.UCSC.EDU!agate!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!concert!rock!taco!eos.ncsu.edu!ashah
   From: ashah@eos.ncsu.edu) (the ciool dude ;-)
   Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.os.os2.misc
   Date: 15 Nov 92 21:33:45 GMT
   References: <1992Nov15.210929.28722@news.arc.nasa.gov>
   Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
   Organization: North Carolina State University
   Lines: 23
   Xref: darkstar.UCSC.EDU comp.periphs.scsi:8604 comp.os.os2.misc:38015

   In article <1992Nov15.210929.28722@news.arc.nasa.gov>, vancamp@paxman.arc.nasa.gov (Warren Van Camp) writes:
   |> Does anyone know if there is a way to use an Adaptec 1542B SCSI controller
   |> at an address other than the default (330) and still be completely supported
   |> for OS/2 disks and tapes (something like the port switch in DOS)?  It turns
   |> out that 330 conflicts with a MIDI controller, which has software that's not
   |> easy to change.  I guess that if there is a way, it would also involve
   |> updating the device support on my boot manager partition (which is not on
   |> the SCSI disk)
   |> 
   |> Thanks for any ideas.
   |> 
   |> -- 
   |> Warren Van Camp
   |> NASA Science Internet Project Office

   Hi,

   From my experience with this board - I think that
   this board works only if the address is at 330 !!!

   Please correct me if I am wrong.

   Ajay.
According to my friend at Adaptec, and their BBS, you can change the port 
address, but doing so will require that you burn a new ROM (binaries for
ROM are available from the Adaptec BBS).  I need to also change my
address soon, since it conflicts with my MPU-IPC Midi card which must use
ports 330 and 331.

-Aaron Williams
aaronw@cats.ucsc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: mbg@cbnewsi.cb.att.com (mitchell.b.germansky)
Subject: using DC6250 in QIC150
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:03:23 GMT
Keywords: getting 250MB in an Archive S2150


i just realized that i can cross the 150MB boundary by using longer
tapes in my Archive S2150 tape unit.  i was using DC6150 and now
tried a DC6250 -- i got 180MB (expect i could get 250MB).

the dysan DC6250 tape box had a warning paper saying that using
extended length cartridges on devices that where designed for
standard length could change the head wear pattern and utlimately
reduce head life.

does anyone have any knowledge of the potential risks?
(i only use my tape drive a few hours a month)


thx and please email to: att!suntoss!mbg (mitch germansky)
From: kee@das.harvard.edu (Kee Chan)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: CD-ROM for SUN and PC ?
Keywords: scsi compatibility
Date: 23 Nov 92 01:27:06 GMT
Reply-To: kee@das.harvard.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: Aiken Computation Lab, Harvard University

We have an off-the-catalog SUN CD-ROM drive for our SS-2.  The question I have
is :  Can we use the same CD-ROM drive on an IBM-compatible PC, provided that
we buy some magic SCSI adaptor card, conversion cable, and software
driver for the PC?

If this can be done,  what is the net's recommendation on
1) adaptor card (could be ISA, EISA, or local bus, but not microchannel)
2) software driver

Thanks

Kee
kee@das.harvard.edu
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.periphs.printers
From: story@sgi.com (David (Duis) Story)
Subject: Re: SCSI Printers
Keywords: SCSI printers
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 21:51:02 GMT

In article <BxsI3M.2FC@research.canon.oz.au> andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman) writes:
>
>I'm interested in finding out about how printers operate over the SCSI
>bus. I'm not talking about the use of SCSI for a printer's own use
>(i.e. to support a disk for font and image storage) but as the main
>interface to the printer. The only SCSI connected printer device's
>that I know anything about use SCSI to transfer rasters (framebuffers)
>from the RIP to the print engine. Is anyone aware of other uses of
>SCSI in printers? For example are there any PostScript printers out
>there that use SCSI as the main interface.


Seiko ships several printers which use an SCSI-2 compliant interface,
and which support their CHGL-2 printer control language (think of it
as something like PCL).  

SRS Imaging ships several SCSI compatible printers which currently
emulate tape devices in order to get around the very vague SCSI-2
specification for printers.

You should really get a copy of the SCSI-2 spec: you might try
"Global Engineering Documents" in Los Angeles for a copy.
(800)854-7179, Irvine, CA.

For more information on a particular printer you can get a copy of the
SCSI spec for their interfaces.

In general, SCSI is just a bus with some messages defined.  You still
have to interpret the PostScript at one end or the other.  If your
target device interprets the PostScript then it's likely to be so slow
that having the SCSI bus' extra bandwidth won't make a lot of
difference.  If your host does the RIP, the bandwidth is really
necessary to keep up with a fast engine.

Cheers,

David Story                        	        Silicon Graphics, Inc.
story@bent.wpd.sgi.com				Mountain View, California

I've changed my name, so duis@sgi.com may bounce, please use story@sgi.com.

Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.periphs.printers
From: andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman)
Subject: SCSI Printers
Summary: SCSI interfaces
Keywords: SCSI printers
Organization: Canon Information Systems Research Australia
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 03:38:10 GMT


I'm interested in finding out about how printers operate over the SCSI
bus. I'm not talking about the use of SCSI for a printer's own use
(i.e. to support a disk for font and image storage) but as the main
interface to the printer. The only SCSI connected printer device's
that I know anything about use SCSI to transfer rasters (framebuffers)
from the RIP to the print engine. Is anyone aware of other uses of
SCSI in printers? For example are there any PostScript printers out
there that use SCSI as the main interface.

Any help would be much appreciated.

-- 
Andy Newman (andy@research.canon.oz.au)
From: delman@mipg.upenn.edu (Delman Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Adaptec U.S. telephone number please
Date: 17 Nov 92 21:56:32 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: University of Pennsylvania, USA.

Need some info on an old Adaptec card (ACB-4000). Could someone email
me the telephone number of Adaptec please? 

Thanks  --- Delman.
--
______________________________________________________________________________

  Delman Lee                                    Tel.: +1-215-662-6780
  Medical Image Processing Group,               Fax.: +1-215-898-9145
  University of Pennsylvania,
  4th floor Blockley Hall,
  418 Service Drive,                         
  Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021,
  U.S.A..                                   Internet: delman@mipg.upenn.edu
______________________________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: neese@adaptx1.UUCP (Roy Neese)
Subject: Re: Bad Block Reassignment
Organization: Adaptec Inc., Texas
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:27:01 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.183835.15365@dorsai.com> head@dorsai.com (Howard Pinsley) writes:
> We are using Seagate SCSI drives (don't have the model number handy), Adaptek
> controllers on a 486 running SCO Unix.  One of these drives has been reporting
> read errors.
> 
> Is there any way to get these blocks into the "bad block table" so that they
> are no longer used?  Seagate tells me to low level format the drive.  A
> different, proportedly knowlegable source says that the format program will
> not detect the bad blocks.  Adaptek has not gotten back to me.
> 
> Any advice would be appreciated.

Obtain SCSICNTL.EXE and use it to set the control bit in the error
recovery page to tell the drive to automatically reassign bad blocks for
writes.  The option exists for reads as well, but user data will almost
always be lost if you enable this.
---

			Roy Neese
			Adaptec Senior UNIX/SCSI Software Engineer
			UUCP:	convex!egsner!adaptex!neese
			Inet:	neese%adaptex@cirr.com
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: lainhart@odel.stg.TRW.COM (Mike Lainhart)
Subject: Re: Buslogic SCSI controllers
Followup-To: lainhart@odel.stg.trw.com
Summary: BusLogic Address
Keywords: scsi,Adaptec,BusLogic,customer-support
Organization:   TRW, One Space Park  MS O1/1061, Redondo Beach,CA 90278  (310) 813-0690
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 15:52:41 GMT

Ed Wahl asked how to contact the BusLogic folks.  This information was
admittedly not printed very conspicuously, but in my campaign to tag
the bad guys of customer support these guys are still on the "A" list.

	     BusLogic Inc.
	     4151 Burton Drive
	     Santa Clara, CA 95054
	     (408) 492-9090  (voice)
	     (408) 492-1542  (FAX)