From: nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos)
Subject: Re: *another false accusation by nyikos* (was Re: A forgery by Adrienne Regard?!?!?!?!? (was: Stipu..))
Organization: USC  Department of Computer Science
Date:  2 Nov 92 20:15:58 GMT

In <1cjte2INN4fj@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:

>In article <1992Oct27.160808.11344@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:

>>I missed this one.

Which "one", Dean?  Are you still missing it?

>>  Did this stupid, blustering fool,

I see you disavowing your earlier retraction of your claim that I am 
stupid.  Since you have reinstated your claim, I would like to see
the evidence that caused the new change of heart.

>> this
>>set theory expert who just announced in another post yet
>>again that he has a PhD really say this stuff? 

Which stuff, Dean?  Why did you delete all the evidence to back up
your statement, yet again?

>Yup.

>But really, don't be too hard on the jerk.  He's got such a blistering
>crush in me that he can't sit down.

Adrienne, if you want to fantasize that I have a crush on you, that's 
your problem, not mine.

Four months ago you made an offer I could not refuse:

#>I've been on this net over 7 years, and I've never understood this fetal
#>worship.  Can you help me?

Of course this was not directed at me, but few people have tried to 
accept your offer to be helped except Martin Guerrero and me, and
Martin did not even know the offer had been made, otherwise he
might have stuck it out longer.

Back in July my reaction read in part:

#I've been on this net for less than 7 days, so please bear with me if
#I am covering old ground.

#I'll have to turn this terminal over to someone who shares this with me,
#so I must be brief now, but I will get back to you.

#Auf wiedersehen!

That's German for *au revoir*, "till we meet [via electronic transmission,
in this case] again."  Let it never be said that I do not try to keep promises.

>It's a sad thing to see such needy personalities.  Bill, would you 
>talk to the poor bloke?  Maybe you can do some good in this area....

>Adrienne Regard

Are you talking to Overpeck, by any chance?  It just so happens I saved
a post from him back in July.  Seems I am not the only one who confused
Bill Overpeck with Phil Buckland.

Post follows my "signature" below.


regard@sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes: >
In article <1992Jul09.024833.143762@cs.cmu.edu> garvin+@cs.cmu.edu 
   (Susan Garvin) writes: >>

>>Let me get this straight - when Adrienne said what she thought
>>to Phil Buckland, she was really vilifying Bill Overpeck?

>(psst, Susan, that's 'villifying', per Bill.  The definition: "when anybody
>says anything, it's a slam against poor ol' Bill".)

Let's see now.  If we characterize Bill as hypersensitive, he'll look
foolish and Adrienne's offensive behavior will look normal...hmmm...
yep, let's do it. 

>Actually, I think I ended up on Bill's shit list about a year ago when
>I actually agreed with him on something:  That one should not make broad
>assumptions about persons one has not met.  Since that date, he's been
>*very* *touchy*.  

Perhaps it's because you continue to make such assumptions despite your 
alleged agreement.

>My opinions are all personal attacks.  My arguments are
>all ad hominem.  My disagreement is an afront to his beliefs.
>
>Ain't life hard.

Is this intended to imply that I'm petty?  Imperceptive?  A whiner? 
 
You continue to live up to your image, Adrienne.  

Bill