From: dskim@eng.umd.edu (Daeshik Kim)
Subject: Re: Don't Preach! (LONG)
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 21:39:32 GMT
Organization: What Org?

	Your preach was one of the very conflicting one
	with your article subject ever since GMT's disapearance.

In article <BzBA6A.4o5@news.cso.uiuc.edu> seo@capone.ccsm.uiuc.edu (Jong-Wook Seo) writes:
>Another person asked "If they made their money legally, what's the 
>problem?". .... Anyway, who are 'THEY?

	You got the 'Another person' right here.

	And my answer is: He/she who made the money their family is spending.

>Let me tell you the real story.

	Just tell me a story but don't preach.

>...reason why Korean public has criticized the "Orange-Jok" is NOT because
>they are .. It is because of the so-called economy driving policy in Korea.

	And the above reason is why I said they are criticizing the
	wrong target.  Please read my posting carefully.

>[low-tax-to-rich] economic development. (I hope you have heard about this
>you don't start to talk about the validity or effectiveness or even morality 
>of this policy. From any of your previous postings, I haven't seen any 
>implications about this.)

	I'm legally Korean and spend almost 25 years in Korea; but
	of course, I know the above; and I also know that your
	[low-tax-to-rich] is not exact statement; rather, it's
	low-tax-to-the-reinvestment; and there were lots of abuse on this.

	And you're welcomed to criticize the abuser, which is different
	from the OJ.

	And the above reason does not justify why OJ deserve those
	shit; only reason I can think of is the GENERALIZATION of
	those who spend their money on luxurious items would have
	made their money via not right way or illegally; however,
	as far as I know if they make their own money, they wouldn't
	be OJ, right?

>...[Korean Econ. Policy deleted]...
>Now, under this circumstance, the money made under unfair tax policy 
>should be 'persuaded' to reinvest in reproduction, NOT to 'buy whatever 
>they want'.

	Nobody persuades one to buy whatever they want.

	Please do not distort my prev. posting with this BS.
	I said they don't deserve the criticism because of the
	fact that they bought what they want.

>The only way is just by publicizing their wrong lifestyle whenever they 
>forget this.

	So what's your definition of wrong lifestyle and
	right one?

>This is how your 'motherland'... This is how the country with full of
>'stupid' people who don't even know how the f*** important the cultural
>diversity is has increased its national economic size...
>They, our people, are not stupid like you dare to insult to be so.
>They have been living really hard time to develop national economy, not to 
>learn what the individualism is about.

	I'm lost here; O.K. I'm KOREAN CITIZEN from Seoul so my people
	is STUPID SEOUL PEOPLE, so WHAT'S YOUR PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT STUPID?

>He has tried to apply American ethics to Korea directly and indirectly.

	Nope, I haven't tried American ethics and I don't know
	what that is.  I haven't even given out any single example
	or any similar thing to support my thought on that
	useless and worthless criticism on OJ.

>[some irrelavent example about the confusion of rich family]
>(The reason why I put this 'redundant' stuff is what has been said by you 
>is about ethics, not the personal reality.)

	I don't get this again.  Maybe I'm too stupid to understand the above.

>Folks do not preach.

	I don't understand the above again; are you trying to
	say they don't preach in Korea but force the others?
-- 
	Daeshik Kim	H: (703) 273-1517 O: (703) 689-5878
	DAESHIK.KIM@sprintintl.sprint.com	dskim@eng.umd.edu
	/PN=Daeshik.Kim/O=SprintIntl/ADMD=Telemail/C=US/@Sprint.com
Newsgroups: soc.culture.korean