HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mel@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu (Meloney D Cregor)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: rON bashing
Date: 3 Jan 93 16:20:03 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network

In article <wXmswB1w165w@iowegia.uucp> mine@iowegia.uucp (shelley kitsis) writes:
>this, I can only say "Thank-you!" (and that goes for all of you, 
>with the exception of Mr. "rON"!) Now, he is another matter
>altogether, and I don't mean to sound bitter or immature when I 
>say, Trygve, "Good for you!" You did a great job of putting him in 
>his place...I tried, but I'm sure it didn't have quite the impact 
>that you did!

And what "place" might that be?  Are you in your 'place'?  Am I 
in my 'place'?  What if I don't know where my 'place' is?  What
if I should accidently stumble out of it?  Is that automatically
grounds for verbal abuse?  Beatings?  Insults from amazingly
clueless posting entities who could do with a great deal less
of the pot and more of the kettle, perhaps.

>I almost feel like I was personally being attacked/violated by his 
>uncalled for remarks....but, as the saying goes, "to each his 
>own!"  Fortunately, I don't think that the are many of "his type"
>out there! (Oh, how ignorance is bliss, Huh?!)

Which is a damn shame, IMO, we could use more of his type, but then
I've had the distinct pleasure of meeting rON and I happened to
have liked what I met.

It's unfortunate that you took his disagreement with your views
as a personal attack, but that is YOUR problem, not rON's.  I
certainly didn't see it as a 'personal' attack on you, but on your
dating criteria.
 
>I just wanted to take this time out to thank both you and Meloney 
>for standing up to this, (sorry, but I don't know any other word
>for it) "Pig!" I think I mentioned that the original post was the 

Hmm.  If that is the impression I gave, then I owe rON a very
huge apology. 

I didn't stand up to a "Pig!".  I disagreed with a warm,
sensitive, caring, individualistic, human being. A human being just
as entitled to his views and beliefs as you are.

Learn to distinguish disagreement and discussion from personal attack.

>I've seemed to have caused!  Thanks to most of you, I'm not afraid 
>to post again in the future....you gave me that courage!

Great.  Welcome.
Keep the courage.  Lose the attitude.

>Perhaps someday, Mr. "R" will be able to confront and live in the 
>real world!!

I expect that someday has come and gone many times for our blowfish.

--
     Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich.
                                   -- Napoleon
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 07:36:43 GMT

In article <1grgmiINNq52@agate.berkeley.edu> monaghn@garnet.berkeley.edu (Mara Monaghan) writes:
>
>  > >In article <JoeMan.7.724562272@> JoeMan@ (Joe Tooman) writes:
>  > >Not to bitch or anything, but it seems to me that the
>  > >female does not have any problem finding a guy anytime
>  > >she feels like she wants a relationship.
>
>Well! I do have the amazing ability to find good cafes,
>open parking spaces, and dark chocolate, but I never 
>realized that other women can find a guy anytime they
>want a relationship! No wonder I haven't had a SO 
>(or even a date) in 4 yrs. Ack! I'm handicapped!

Why, of course women can find a guy any time she wants a relationship--
it just may not be one that she wants.  Why, I've got several extras
in stock over here--several of them don't drool much and own their own
shoes and if you'll forgive a few psychoses and keep them away from
sharp objects and fragile things, you'll get along fine.

Of course it always seems to members of either sex, at least occasionally,
that the other side "has it easy."  (This is largely based on the wonderful
fact that other people's problems usually occupy more of their time and
attention than they do yours, so they appear much less significant.)  The
perception that women "can always get a guy" may also be enhanced by the
number of men who feel the need to "prove their masculinity" by hitting on
anything with even a female-sounding name (occasionally my mailbox gets
pretty interesting) which creates the illusion that all women have men
genuinely interested in them.

Trygve   (Of course, in your case, perhaps they just find out your name
          and naturally assume that you're an illusion.)

--
"Doctor Rude's Guide to Good Sax by Doctor Rude Borschthammer.  Bubbly,
 perky Doctor Rude answers all your questions about this popular
 instrument.  For sale to adults over 21 only.  190pp."
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women,soc.men,ba.singles
From: oleg@netcom.com (Oleg Kiselev)
Subject: Re: Duck and Jive (was Re: Pre-Sex Contract )
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 11:43:11 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.163707.1975@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> bhv@areaplg2.corp.mot.com (Bronis Vidugiris) writes:
>I lack the specific >data on this - (I'm not sure if it's available.)  

I.e. "I am making this up as I go and it sounds convincing to *me*".


-- 
Oleg Kiselev at home			...use the header to find the path
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Lets be HONEST about Abusive things
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 23:50:11 GMT

In article <75682@apple.apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>quirke_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz writes:
>
>>tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>
>>> Actually, I think drieux has a very good point here--I know I'd be more
>>> than happy to take a good long look at one of Stef's orgasms as what it
>>> does to her.
>
>>   Pardon moi, I'm rather new to this, but would 7 points be appropriate ?
>
>It would be, except Trygve loses a point every time he re-uses one of his
>suckups. Which means this one scores at approximately -4953.

Gosh--you mean I've already seen 4960 of your orgasms?  (Either I really
need to start paying more attention or we need to work harder on intensity.)

Trygve   (Now, to see if the net is still eating my messages....)

--
"Jeffery Tate's apartment reeked of seduction, from the calculatedly
 uncomfortable chairs which would practically force a female guest to
 share his overstuffed and undersized couch to the prominent and well-
 stocked bar to the full-ceiling mirror over the bed with the little
 white letters that said, 'OBJECTS IN MIRROR ARE LARGER THAN THEY APPEAR.'"
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Date: 26 Dec 1992 19:08:19 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <oneil.725199192@cwis> oneil@cwis.unomaha.edu (Sharon O'Neil) writes:
>tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>Nah.  I think that the guys that they were inviting over were jerks because
>they wouldn't have considered these girls for various reasons, including
>the fact that they weren't fashion model lookalikes.  They weren't 
>unattractive, but they weren't Christie Brinkley either.

I think it's time to let you in on a few secrets.  Men don't consider Christie
Brinkley attractive.  One, she's married (last I heard).  Two, she looks too
much like a TV spokesmodel, family-oriented platonic beauty in all its
blandness.  Three, women are the only ones I ever hear referring to her as
attractive, which just goes to prove that you really have to be a man to know
what turns on a man.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Wall)
Subject: Re: Vasectomies (was Re: Pre-Sex Contract)
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 18:37:32 GMT

In article <16036@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <1gtlagINNqvd@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> ci022@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Richard Kirby) writes:
> 
>|Hmmm.  That gives me an idea.  Usenet terminals in the bathrooms
>|to discourage grafetti.
>
>You mean there aren't terminals in the bathrooms already?  I figured that's
>where a lot of the articles posted recently were coming from.

This thread doesn't deserve that high of a compliment!!!  Some of these
posts (names excluded), oh what the heck, Keiths posts didn't even come
from the bathroom, maybe the Gutter :-).

Cheers,
Jeff Wall
wall@hel4.brl.mil
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: On Catching Bad Girls.
Date: 30 Dec 92 11:23:59 GMT
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper

Diane writes:

] In article <1992Dec29.213509.26642@CERIS.Purdue.EDU>
] dheisler@CERIS.Purdue.EDU (Dave Heisler) writes:
]  
] >after fairly dismal luck in meeting good women and
] >converting them to SO's, i'm considering chasing
] >"bad" ones.                              ^^^^^^^
]  
] Dave dave dave dave dave! BAD girls don't RUN! If they ran, they'd
] be good girls (if I'm going too fast for you, let me know.... :) )
]  
] Diane
]  

I want to Agree with Diane here, 
a point well typed.

What Dave really Needs to remember is that
GoodGirls[tm] like NFS_File_Handles, if
left out of the refrigerator too long will
soon go stale on their way to going Bad.

So My Advice, is to rummage around in the
old refrigerator and see what you can find.


ciao
drieux

ps: of course, the other alternative involves /etc/mount,
but that gets complicated if they are not in the fstab.



-- 
Modern Day Problems:

This is Not a .sigfile addendum to the Post.
You are just reading beyond the edge.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: SF ISO S*M
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Distribution: usa
Date: 23 Dec 92 18:12:06 GMT

tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>... being involved with a human being is much more rewarding
>in the long run than being involved with a pet.

Oh, I don't know.  Personally, I enjoy petting the person I'm involved
with.

Oops ... wrong newsgroup.

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: pw@panix.com (Paul Wallich)
Subject: Re: Fetishes?
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 23:27:56 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Trivializers R Us

In article <1992Dec22.200926.20370@netcom.com> cocoa@netcom.com writes:
>In article <1992Dec16.184244.902@cbfsb.cb.att.com> sms@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (steven.m.stein) writes:
>>>(My 3 year old nephew Andrew has really cute, round shoulders :)
>>>
>>I think you're just plain wierd.
>>(Guess there's no reason now for us to meet on my next trip out West)
>
>You bwoke my widdle heart. :(
>- -
>Where's the kaboom?  There was supposed to be an earthshattering kaboom.
>

Your nephew is all of three years old, and steven stein says he's not
visiting. Isn't that answer enough?

paul    I don't believe I just said that. Maybe I didn't. Don't look.

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: WShatner@AMW.inc
Subject: Re: SWF 24 Looking for PenPals
Organization: University of Missouri
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 16:04:02 CST

  This is another exciting episode of AMERICA'S  MOST WANTED......
 
>eaken@unssun.nevada.edu (Marsha) "THE PERP" writes:
>: This is in regards to all the responses I received.......
>: I will need to have your internet addresses in order to
>: e-mail!!!!!!!
>: Thank you,
>: Marsha
>
 
A shrewd Marty Collins (aka "THE PIGEON") replies:
 
>Why in the world do you need an internet address. I would respond, but
>I hardly know you well enough to give out my INTERNET ADDRESS :)
 
 
Marty called the Los Angeles office of AMERICA'S MOST WANTED with the
information that after he had indeed supplied "Marsha" with his internet
address, she stated that she also needed all of his credit card numbers
and the keys to his Porche as proof of his sincerity.
 
Our investigators sprang into action. Within minutes of an anonymous
tip, a LAPD swap team had surrounded  a Palo Alto strip-bar that "Marsha"
had given as her address at voter registration. We found "Marsha" just
as she was about to stiff another poor pathetic slob.
 
Based on evidence obtained from Marty and other victims,"Marsha" was eventually
convicted of extortion, fraud, and deliberate misuse of power tools. She is
currently serving a 3-5 year sentence at a maximum security prison.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Wall)
Subject: Re: SF ISO S*M
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 18:20:50 GMT

In article <75864@apple.apple.COM> pooh@Apple.COM (Pooh) writes:
>In the referenced article, keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard) writes:
>
>So, like, Keith, what's the alternative?  Are you looking
>for a woman who lets you tell her what to do and when to
>do it, and wants to let you direct all her activities for
>the rest of her life?
>
>There was an article in the International Herald Tribune
>recently (which originated in the New York Times, I think)
>about how increasing numbers of divorced women don't want
>to remarry, because they feel the single life is much
>better than the married life they left.  They appreciate
>finally having the freedom to do what they want, and have
>plenty of friends to make up for not having a live-in
>relationship, whereas divorced men pine for the days when
>their wives would run their household for them and do
>their laundry.
>
>If a man doesn't want to give up his independence, he's
>just "being a man," whereas if a woman does it, she's
>seen as selfish.  Well, if marriage means by definition
>that I have to give up my mind and my will, then count
>me out!

I'm 25 now  but when I was 23 I dated a divorced 36 year old lady.  It was a
very good relationship.  It lasted a year until I moved.  The only
drawback to the relationship was her two boys, 6 and 10.  There was
absolutely nothing wrong with the boys I just wasn't interested in being
around kids so much.  Who knows what would have happened has I not moved.  
I found my relationship with her to be much more relaxed not near as much
anxiety it was just simply more comfortable that my previous relationship
, which was with a girl my age.

BTW Pooh I don't want anyone running my household or doing my laundry
(been doing my own laundry for years).  :-)  And Pooh don't ever give up
your independence, It's what makes us individuals!!!

Cheers,
Jeff Wall
wall@hel4.brl.mil

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 93 20:06:30 GMT

In article <wXmswB1w165w@iowegia.uucp> mine@iowegia.uucp (shelley kitsis) writes:
>
>Trygve,
>I'm sorry I don't know you..you seem to have it all together (as 
>opposed to a few others that have commented on this 
>subject..namely, the "infamous" Mr. "R!" 
>You, and the majority of the others took the time out to _read_ 
>what I had written, and still respected (whether you agreed or 
>disagreed with what I was trying to get across) my concerns! For 
>this, I can only say "Thank-you!" (and that goes for all of you, 
>with the exception of Mr. "rON"!) Now, he is another matter
>altogether, and I don't mean to sound bitter or immature when I 
>say, Trygve, "Good for you!" You did a great job of putting him in 
>his place...I tried, but I'm sure it didn't have quite the impact 
>that you did!

[...]

Thanks--I'm glad you enjoyed my comments.  I ought to warn you, though,
that I wasn't trying to put rON is his place--I do respect his opinions,
even though I may disagree wth them from time to time.  (After all, it
would get boring out here if everybody agreed with anyone else.)

I hope rON's remarks didn't discourage you too much--things said here
shouldn't be taken as a personal attack, but rather as strong evidence
that some people have a more confrontational style on the net than
others (or they may just be in a confrontational mood that day).  By and
large, none of this should be taken too seriously--after all, next week
you may find yourself sharing the same side of another discussion with
rON and you won't want to be angry with him, because blowfishes get all
prickly when frightened.

Trygve   (Reminds me of Dan Mocsny--I used to disagree completely with
          practically everything he wrote (and vice-versa) and he could
          be as confrontational as anybody, but I also found his posts
          to be among the most enjoyable.)

--
"Next up:  _The Hatchback of Notre Dame_,
 based on the novel by Victor Yugo"
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 93 15:53:46 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Followup-To: talk.religion


For sake of sanity, I split this into two articles, this one talks about
religion and society, and followups to talk.religion, the next talks
about religion and dating, and followups to soc.singles...

>>And that, Michael, is an archaic and close-minded way of running a society.
>Why?
>Why is it any more of a close-minded criterium then any other criteria like
>intelligence, humor, physical characteristc, geographic location, level
>of education, lifestyle compatibility, sexual preference, etc?
No, no, its archaic for running a society, not for getting laid. People will
always and forever have their own criteria for choosing thier sexual
partners.

>Religion is a set of beliefs and if you truly believe, then you must
>abide by the sanctions of that belief system.  To not do so, is
>hypocrisy and I have a great deal less tolerance for this than I do
>for religious belief.  

Who sez?
I'm not allowed to belive in God because I think that hokum rituals, from
kosher foods to eating representational peices of bread to marching a bunch
of times around a big rock to lighting candles and dancing nude under the moon,
the whole lot of 'em, I'm not allowed to believe in God because I think those
rituals are silly?

I think it idiotic to be utilizing modern technologies that spread your words
worldwide almost instantaniously, but refeuse to eat a ham-and-cheese
sandwich because you might get condemned to whatever for it.
Hell, I can see the purpose of where customs like that got started- the limits
on pork and dairy products in Jewish communities made sense a thousand years
ago when things like 'preservation' and 'refrigeration' and 'sterilization'
weren't around and the threat of disease was much more thretening, or the
semi-barbaric custom of circumcision- which made sense in a region and time
where hygene was pretty well non-existant.
But nowadays? And to say that a society should be limited by things that have
been non-problems for many many years?
>That< is archaic.

God is god is god, and I would be willing to bet that god cares more about
things like 'peace' and 'love' and 'people getting along' than he does about
if you eat the wrong type of food.
r.
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Giving up good girls, looking for "bad" ones
Date: 30 Dec 1992 04:39:52 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Dec29.213509.26642@CERIS.Purdue.EDU> dheisler@CERIS.Purdue.EDU (Dave Heisler) writes:
>Hi,
>
>after fairly dismal luck in meeting good women and
>converting them to SO's, i'm considering chasing
>"bad" ones.
>
>Does anyone have some good hints ?

Become a bodybuilder, and join your local (heterosexual) BDS&M community.

>nice guy, but willing to change :-)

and change this to "but willing to charge for my services".
From: loosemore-sandra@cs.yale.edu (Sandra Loosemore)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Date: 29 Dec 1992 08:39:33 -0500
Organization: staff hacker @ Yale Haskell project
Distribution: na
	<1hodr6INNpdk@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU>
	<1992Dec29.054837.3942@mtu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: functor.systemsz.cs.yale.edu
In-reply-to: rossi@mtu.edu's message of Tue, 29 Dec 1992 05:48:37 GMT

rossi@mtu.edu (Rossi) writes:

      I'd offer to share my Elmer's Clue All with you, but then what
   would poor Elmer do?  Us guys we gotta stick together.

Besides, that would be tacky.  :-)

-Sandra

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 22:33:07 GMT

In article <16109@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <1992Dec29.054837.3942@mtu.edu> rossi@mtu.edu (Rossi) writes:
>>In article (Sandra Loosemore) writes:
>|>markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>|>
>|>   Cory Everson is perfection.
>
>Who?

Cory Everson is a several-time Ms. Olympia winner and is one of the best
female bodybuilders of all time; she's cute, but I wouldn't call her
perfection.  (She shares the unusual distinction with Tom Platz of having
thighs larger around than their waists.)

Unfortunately, I can't think of anyone to call "perfection," in large
part because visual stimuli just isn't enough--people become more 
attractive and appealing the more time I spend with them and I models
just don't cut it next to women I've been romantically involved with.

Trygve   (I suppose it's more confusing this way, having my standards
          of beauty developing to center on whomever I'm involved with.)
--
"Make an armadillo smile and the world is your oyster."
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Picking up the Tab (was: Re: What is gold-digging?)
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 13:41:00 GMT

In article <92364.203332JET3@psuvm.psu.edu> <JET3@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>In article <1992Dec21.141317.19321@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com
>>           No Need to be confused - It's dateing MAN - ooooooHHHHHH
>>Hi I'm goin down to Schmoe's to slap down some sliders, comin? = you pay.
>>Hello. Would you like to go to dinner? = I pay.
>>May I entice you into being flayed alive and having hot oil poured in every
>>orifice of your body while a room full of people worship Satan = Dutch date.
>Honestly JD, you keel me.... everytime I fall off my chair and howl
>till I can't breath.....hehehehehehhe  *weeze* *gasp*  Now my fellow
>cohorts are coming around to pick me up off the floor and place me back
>in my chair.
>
>So if he asks me out = he pays.
 
For both of us.
 
>If I ask him out = he pays.
 
He should offer.
 
>If I say let's go to the pub, comin'? = He still pays.
 
For me at the very least.
 
>Jean

I may have to bring along *that* girl in Jan. We had a recent bout of Jealousy
as opposed to Jeapardy.
 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
                                 doh#0000000005
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex,soc.veterans