HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: zuniga@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Ralph Zuniga (FREAC/CAR))
Subject: Re: lou holtz should be drawn and quartered
Organization: Florida State University Computing Center
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 23:35:38 GMT

In article <19519@ector.cs.purdue.edu> sjc@cs.purdue.EDU (Steve Chapin) writes:
>}} In article <1992Sep14.012304.4599@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> sschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Susan E Schudt) writes:
>}} 
>}} Yea right.  Now it's second and ten, instead of second and three.  Two more 
>}} downs and Michigan has the ball with three timeouts left.  Come on, people.  I 
>}} have no problem with what Holtz did.  I DO have a problem with the people who
>}} booed the team.  Get a life.  They played their butts off, especially the
>}} defense.
>
>I said, I don't have any problem with Holtz did either, *if he'll just
>admit he wasn't trying to win.*  He was obviously playing not to lose
>(i.e., for the tie at the time).  No problem.  But to try and sell
>that load of hooey about looking at coverages while running the ball
>is garbage.
>
>I repeat:
>
>o Notre Dame isn't going to see what kind of pass coverage Michigan is
>  in until they line up in a passing formation.
>
>o Calling two running plays in a row doesn't jibe with wanting to see
>  coverages.
>
>}} Who do you coach for, by the way??
>
>No one.  Arguments ad hominem don't matter much.
>
>}} Bettis almost broke through with a tremendous gainer.  Would you have been
>}} happy then?  A first down was achieved on the second running play.
>}} Unfortunately, the penalty called it back.  If there wasn't the penalty, there
>}} were 30 seconds on the clock.  First down.  I wonder what could've happened?
>
>Yeah, that great first down.  They still had > 40 yards to go to get
>to reasonable field goal range, and 30 seconds in which to do it.  (At
>least I thought the interception of Grbac took place on about the ND
>20).
>
>}} Stop second guessing Lou.  He is there for a reason.  He didn't play to tie, he
>}} played not to lose.  The players didn't deserve to lose.
>
>Fine.  No problem.  But he should have the cajones to admit it.
>                                           ^^^^^^^
>}} Again, who do YOU coach for??  Have your scenarios worked??? ;)
>
>Again, no one, at least not in football.  But my soccer coaching
>doesn't have much bearing here :-)
>
>sjc@cs.purdue.edu               Steve Chapin           Today's Grammar Lesson:
>                      I won one game, three to two, too.
>
>                      Beef:  Real food for a dead planet.

That's COJONES. 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mls@unislc.uucp (Michael Simons)
Subject: Re: BYU - America's Most Hated Team???
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:01:24 GMT

From article <1992Sep11.010109.22182@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>, by zuniga@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Ralph Zuniga (FREAC/CAR)):
> As I watch tonight's game (9/10) between San Diego St. and BYU, I
> see that the BYU fans are calling their team the most hated in America.
> Huh?? I can think of 10 or more teams that I hate more than BYU. Just
> what is BYU thinking??? Anyone from BYU care to comment???

You obviously don't read Sports Illustrated. A week or so ago they had
an article on how BYU was Americas most hated team.

	Mike Simons
	Unisys -- Salt Lake
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: BYU - America's Most Hated Team???
Date: 14 Sep 92 15:33:03 GMT
Organization: Chevron

In article <jjonsson.155@alexandria.lib.utah.edu> jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu writes:
>>Regarding the scientific validity of that article, let me just say
>>this: the two words "Notre Dame" did not appear in the whole piece,
>>neither together nor seperately.  Not even when they gave a short list
>>of "other most hated schools."  

What were the "other most hated schools" mentioned...???


-- 
GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!!    | "There once was a deputy named Fife,
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!!!!    |  Who carried a gun and a knife.
James Clyde  LSU '91    |  The gun was all dusty, the knife was all rusty,
  Mayberry Graffiti =>  |  'Cause he never caught a crook in his life."
From: mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: ACC Games this week.
Date: 10 Sep 92 07:20:58 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Ramblin' Wrecks from Georgia Tech

boisseau@chpc.utexas.edu (John R. Boisseau (Jay)) wrote:
}
}Well, I still think I was more on the mark (no pun intended) than you when
}I predicted 17-20 points by the 'Hoos. Oh, sure they scored 28 ...

Man, you Wahoos are a tough audience!  I promised you 28 points
3 days before the game, and you got *exactly* 28 points.  What
more do you want from me? ;-)

}>NC State 31, Maryland 12.
}
}I think I'll go between you on this one. NC State 28, MD 10. I think
}Kaleo's proficiency with the R&S in his first game was overestimated.
}yeah, he set a school record for passes completed (32), but he threw
}50+ times, and he only got 270 yards (< 10 yards a carry). 

Even worse than that - only about 5 yards per passing attempt, which
is very poor.

And in answer to your query about Bill Dooley, he is coaching
the Demon Deacons through the remainder of this season.

-- 
Mark Mitchell           Georgia Tech            mm42@prism.gatech.edu
 "There was such speed in her little body, and such lightness in her
    footfall, it is no wonder her brown study astonishes us all."
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ssj@ais.org (Stephen S. Johnston)
Subject: Re: UMich-ND bickering (was Re: ND's DuBose Situation)
Organization: UMCC
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 07:03:31 GMT

In article <9209081530.AA23575@dseg.ti.com> noonan@icd3 (Michael Noonan) writes:
 
>14-9 is a very nice record to have against a team, especially
>if that team is Notre Dame.  However, it loses some of it's
>importance (in current analysis) when you realize that 6 of
>the last 7 were won by Notre Dame.  I don't know, but it
>seemed to me that someone who's team had lost 6 of 7 shouldn't
>be running around saying, "when will you 'finally start to
>*win* some'."
 
Not to be nit-picky, but the Irish streak was at four until 
UM beat them last year.  Michigan hasn't lost 6 of the 
last 7 games with ND.  I don't have the records handy to back 
it up, but I remember the commotion on campus last year that 
"nobody will beat Michigan five years in a row."  
This year's game will be a good one.  Both teams should 
have strong offenses.  The key to victory (IMHO) will be 
defense.  ND's defense didn't impress against Northwestern
(again, IMHO) and the Wolverines will sorely miss Erick 
Anderson (ILB).  Of course, the loss of DuBose will hamper 
the Irish.  Two more days!  
  Go Michigan!         Beat Irish!
 
==================================================================
Steve Johnston                                Go Blue! 
ssj@ais.org                              Webber, Rose & Co. 1993
Steve_Johnston@um.cc.umich.edu          NCAA Nat'l. Champs to be
Bluefront@HeroMud II (Heroine)
==================================================================
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ddn@cbnews.cb.att.com (david.d.nason)
Subject: TOSU-BG: War of Ohio
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 18:08:10 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.150842.18714@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick E Fleming) writes:
>
>If the Buckeyes don't put the Falcons away in the first half, they will find 
>themselves in a bigger dogfight than last week.  Bowling Green has a better 
>passing attack and has relied on Erik White's leadership to come from behind in
>8 of their last 12 victories.  BG also carries the nation's third longest 
>winning streak into the game.  Further, the Falcons are a well coached, very 
>disciplined team which tends to make them stronger in the fourth quarter than 
>many other teams.  Remember the recent bowl game against that other team named 
>the Falcons?
>

Yep, I remember it.

I think BG (and the MAC in general) deserves a lot of credit.  They've
generally done well against "bigger" schools (Michigan St, West Virginia,
Clemson, etc.).  And BG was the best of the MAC last year and could
well be again this year.  White is a good QB and he's got a good receiver
in Szlachcic (or whatever it is).  Word is that BG's lines aren't too good,
particularly the offensive line.  I didn't see last week's BG game, so
I can't really comment though.

I agree that a key for Ohio St will be putting them away early.  They
didn't do it against Louisville, and if they don't do it against BG
they may find themselves in the same situation.  Having said that, I
think OSU will win handily, but I don't think OSU will blow them out.
I hold out confidence that we didn't see the real Buckeyes last week.
I say -

	Ohio State: 31
	Bowling Green: 14

Should be a fun game - I'm looking forward to it.  I'd rather see
OSU-BG than many of the preconference games OSU has played in the past.

david

p.s. Buckeye freshman linebacker Matt Christopher, who played quite a bit
     last week, broke his leg in practice yesterday and is out for at least
     6 weeks.  Raymont Harris is supposedly full-go.  Robert Smith, as has
     been reported, is out until at least Syracuse, and probably until
     Wisconsin.
From: zcjm0f@wwnv42.uucp (CJohn Mace)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: UCLA 92
Keywords: n
Date: 10 Sep 92 19:44:25 GMT
Organization: Amoco Production

>
>The schedule looks pretty easy by bruin standards.  No monsterious
>non-conference opponent and we don't play washington.  I know that
>it is a pipe dream, but what would happen if both the Bruins and
>Huskies go undefeated? Who would get the Rose Bowl bid.  Would it go to
>the Bruins cause Washington went last?  If so where would Washiongton
>go with this Bowl Alliance?
>
UCLA goes to the Rose Bowl, Washington goes to the Bowl Coalition to
play a National Champeeenship game

cmuck
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: trice@brtph329.bnr.ca (Tony Rice P885)
Subject: Re: Has Va Tech's schedule changed ?
Organization: BNR, Inc. Research Triangle Park, NC
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 19:30:09 GMT

The schedule I posted is from the wallet sized card distributed at the
local book stores and by the Ticket Office.  I double checked it with
that card and with the Hokie Huddler and it is correct with the exception
that I left off Southern Miss on Nov 14.
 
Where did you get that bum schedule from?


1992 Virginia Tech Football Schedule

Sept 5 James Madison         
    12 @East Carolina
    19 @Temple
    26 West Virginia
Oct  3 Open
    10 @Louisville   
    17 NC State
    24 Miami
    31 @Rutgers
Nov  7 @Syracuse       
    14 Southern Miss
    21 Virginia


BTW: JMU 20 - VA TECH 49
     First half Tech & JMU traded touchdowns back and forth but the
     second half saw the Hokies walk all over JMU's defense.  Finally
     have a QB on the Hokie squad who will throw the ball, and therow
     it well!


-- 
==========================================================
                      Tony R. Rice                      
         Systems Development Environment Support         
----------------------------------------------------------
trice@bnr.ca                        Bell-Northern Research
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Big 8 Update
Date: 4 Sep 92 14:41:34 GMT
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


NOTE:I'm having a little trouble with my news feed.  If I don't
	answer a posting, that maybe why.  And do you want my
	predictions?


Thu(9-3)OU @ TexasTech...OU 34-9
For those who got to see this game, OU showed that they can
run and pass.  The Sooners also showed that losing 8 starters
didn't hurt them that much.  Gundy was in fine form with 22-28
passing for a school record 341yds.  Rasheed rushed for 73yds
making sure the ground game was still there.  OU basically used
a 1-back 3-receiver set.  On occasion they had 2 backs.  TTU
had several dropped pass which hurt several of their drives.

OU	13	7	0	14-34
TTU	9	0	0	 0- 9
OU  Williams 4run(Blanton kick)
TTU Hall 1run(Davis kick)
OU  Rasheed 7 pass from Gundy(kick blocked)
TTU blocked kick returned for safety
OU  Williams 13 pass from Gundy(Blanton kick)
OU  Gundy 1run(Blanton kick)
OU  Beaver 5 int return(Blanton kick)

		ou	ttu
1st		23	21
rush		37-135	48-139
pass		341	150
ret yds		55	18
com-att-int	22-29-1	12-31-1
punts		5-38	6-42
fumb-lost	3-0	1-1
penalties-yd	10-101	6-57
time of poss	27:58	32:02

Rushing
OU-Rasheed 11-73, Frazier 6-31, Williams 9-19, Chandler 4-11
TTU-Morris 20-103, BHill 5-33, Freeman 3-7
Passing
OU-Gundy 22-28-1-341, SCollins 0-1-0-0
TTU-Hall 12-31-1-150
Receiving
OU-Rasheed 5-53, Williams 5-34, Brady 3-41, Mills 2-97
TTU-Hill 4-56, Mitchell 3-36, Morris 2-22


Sat(9-5)
	ColoSt @ CU
        Utah @ NU
        KU @ OregonSt
        IndSt @ OSU
        OhioU @ ISU

	conf		overall
OU	0-0-0		1-0-0
CU	0-0-0		0-0-0
ISU	0-0-0		0-0-0
KU	0-0-0		0-0-0
KSU	0-0-0		0-0-0
MU	0-0-0		0-0-0
NU	0-0-0		0-0-0
OSU	0-0-0		0-0-0

TV games are CST.
PrimeNetwork....B8 games at midnight Sat and 6pm Sunday.  All 8
	coaches show starting at 3pm Wed.

Sat(9-12)    
	ArkansasSt @ OU
        BallSt @ KU
        CU @ Baylor
        MU @ Ill	 2:30pm ABC
        ISU @ Iowa	11:30am ESPN
        MidTennSt @ NU

Sat(9-19)
        CU @ Minnesota
        Tulane @ ISU
        KU @ Tulsa
        Montana @ KSU
        OSU @ Michigan	11:30am ESPN
        TexasA&M @ MU
        NU @ Washington	 8:30pm ESPN
        USCal @ OU	11:00am ABC

Thu(9-24)
	Cal @ KU	 6:45pm ESPN
Sat(9-26)
	ArizonaSt @ NU
        Iowa @ CU
        MU @ Indiana
        N.Iowa @ ISU
        Temple @ KSU
        Tulsa @ OSU
--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: For those of you who haven't heard...
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 00:23:22 GMT

In article <1992Sep7.154809.10911@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>, swanson@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Bob Swanson) writes:
> trev@hubcap.clemson.edu (Trevor Bauknight) writes:
>>
>>The Citadel defeated Arkansas by the score of 10-3, Saturday.
> 
> Arkansas' coach, (damn, name escapes me at the moment) abruptly resigned a
> few hours after this game, saying that the program wasn't where it needed to

His name is Jack Crowe.  He was the Auburn offensive coordinator in the
mid-80's.

-- 
David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
From: sjc@cs.purdue.EDU (Steve Chapin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: lou holtz should be drawn and quartered
Date: 14 Sep 92 01:53:13 GMT
	<1992Sep13.215844.3295@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University


I hardly call Michigan's drive down the length of the field at the end
of the game "playing for the tie."  If Grbac had better judgment than
ABC (who would stoop to employing Brent Musberger), Michigan would
have been kicking a field goal to win the game.  That's not playing
for a tie in my book.

>> Or, should Michigan disguise a zone coverage as man-to-man, Mirer could, 
>> thinking his primary receiver is in single coverage, throw into the zone and 
>> give Michigan the ball just beyond the 20 after the interception.

C'mon, if you can't trust your Candidate For The Heisman Trophy (tm),
who can you trust?  Are you really trying to say that Mirer is that
inept?  I said, "throw the ball out of bounds if there was any doubt."
*Any* doubt.  If Mirer is really the Heisman candiate that the
NBC/Notre Dame football announcers would have you believe, he should
certainly be able to avoid this.

Of course, Elvis "Candidate For The Heisman Trophy (tm)" Grbac
couldn't, so maybe it is too much to ask.

sjc@cs.purdue.edu               Steve Chapin           Today's Grammar Lesson:
                      I won one game, three to two, too.

                      Beef:  Real food for a dead planet.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ddn@cbnews.cb.att.com (david.d.nason)
Subject: Re: tu rumor
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 17:40:54 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.143601.13198@menudo.uh.edu> HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.) writes:
>
>
>  Heard a rumor that the University of Texas would be moving to the 
>Big 10/11/12.  Can anyone confirm or deny this with authority?
>

Quoted from an interview several months ago with Big-10 Comissioner Jim Delany:

Question: Does the Big-10 plan any further expansion?

Delany: At the present time the Big 10 is not considering further expansion.
	The Council of Presidents, when Penn State was admitted, put into
	effect a 5 year moratorium and unless a super majority of the Council
	of Presidents voted to put this issue on the agenda, it won't even
	be discussed.

david
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mminihan@inetg1.ARCO.COM (Mike Minihan)
Subject: Re: t.u. is leaving the SWC? Info anyone?
Organization: ARCO Oil and Gas Company
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 15:51:39 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.151047.9677@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>,
cobarruvias@asd2.jsc.nasa.gov writes:
> Just heard that t.u is leaving the SWC for the Big 10. Anyone hear this
> one?
>  

My source tell me that t.u. is going to the SEC, and atm is going to the
Big 8.

-- 

Mike Minihan      mminihan@arco.com
From: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: 91 BlockBuster (Was Re: Bama in the polls)
Date: 7 Sep 92 22:09:48 GMT
Reply-To: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Distribution: na
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp. (VMS Software Support - Colorado)

--
>>
>>Washington, Colorado, and Oklahama will find it very difficult to move the 
>>ball this year. Which brings up the offense. Derrick Brown and Calvin Jones >are

>I wouldn't count on that...  remember last year, Nebraska played real well
>against pasties like colorado state only to get thrashed by UW and Miami.

>>       Sept. 19   Nebraska 24  Washington 17!!

>We'll see on 19th how good they really are...

>Njan

Njan, I agree with you on the "patsies" point but I disagree with you on
the other point. Washington did not "Thrash" Nebraska. When you are behind
by 4 going into the 4th quarter, but come back and win, you did not "thrash"
the other team - even if you did out-stat them.

I believe Nebraska can "play with" the likes of Washington. Beating them is
not the same as "playing with" a team enough to stay close. I think this will
be a good game.

You you do admit that CSU is a "patsie". This brings up another question. CU
threw pretty well vs CSU - a known "patse", but how will they do vs a known
powerhouse? I'm not saying they won't do well. I'm just saying that the data
is still incomplete untill they play someone who is REALLY GOOD or GREAT.

I'm not sure if Iowa is in that catagory or not. Baylor and Minnisota are 
definately not. Iowa might be. They did play Miami kind of tough at home.

So the bottom line is that the verdict is still out on how good NU, OU, and
CU are.

Husker Henderson
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 M_Henderson               | "Could you please continue the petty bickering?
 Marty Henderson           |  I find it most intriguing."   ---    Data, 
 Woodland Park, Colorado   |  Star Trek, The Next Generation, "Haven"
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Subject: Re: UTAH 24 : #11 NEBRASKA 21 
Keywords: ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN
Reply-To: m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp. (VMS Software Support - Colorado)
Distribution: USA
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 22:58:29 GMT

--


>	Believe it or not, it will happen tomorrow.


>JLI, PSU '90

            NOT !!!!!!!!!!!

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 M_Henderson               | "Could you please continue the petty bickering?
 Marty Henderson           |  I find it most intriguing."   ---    Data, 
 Woodland Park, Colorado   |  Star Trek, The Next Generation, "Haven"
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: bulls@cwis.unomaha.edu (Richie J. Anderson)
Subject: Re: CAN ANYONE BEAT THE HUSKIES?
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Distribution: seattle
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 17:36:38 GMT


    The Huskers are going to beat them and rember last year 
the Huskers wre up at half time over the Huskies by the
score of 29 to 13 (if I rember right) and they will do a fine 
job destroying them and like their first two opponets.
From: stassen@alc.com (Chris Stassen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Buckeye Crystal Ball
Date: 9 Sep 92 19:15:50 GMT
Organization: The Lion's Den, San Jose

Dan West predicted:
> Buckeyes  27
> Cardinals 10

That wasn't a bad prediction;  right in line with the point spread.

Jeff Nappi replied:
> Well it should have been the above score but again the Buckeyes show
> that they are nothing better then a second rung team. 

Hey, let's not go overboard!  It's only the first game of the season, and
many teams (e.g., Texas A&M) look bad and should improve a lot over the
first could of weeks.  I think there are *several* things from that game
to be happy about:

1) The offense (expected to be the "weak link" again) looked strong.
2) The offensive game plan was vastly improved over last year's ones.
3) Herbstreit threw the ball better than anyone had thought he could.
4) The goofs that kept the 'O' from putting the game out of reach are fixable.
5) The DL looked as good as last year's (especially newcomer "Big Daddy").
6) Special teams, under a new management plan, seemed to do quite well.

If you *have* to be a pessimist (for unknown reasons, most Buckeye fans
seem to want to whine), then you can depress yourself with:

1) The defense (expected to be the team's strength) surrendered 400 yards.
2) The new "4-3 stack" defense couldn't stop the draw play.
3) The DL may be good, but was killed late in the game by lack of depth.
4) The DB (supposed to be the strength of the defense) didn't look so good.
5) It's possible Smith and Harris will carry injuries into the Big Ten games.
6) Big Ten officiating is still incompetent (e.g., Cothran's "fumble").

I still think 10 wins isn't out of reach for this team, provided that: the
defense plays up to the level of last year's defense; and the offense
eliminates the minor mistakes that plagued them but otherwise plays as
well as they did Saturday.

Cooper has had a lot of bad breaks (such as highly regarded recruits
leaving the team for various reasons -- medical problems, too far from
girlfriend, etc.), and I hope this is the year when he gets his share of
good ones.
--
Chris Stassen 			 408-943-0630 			stassen@alc.com
From: rhouston@glacier.sim.es.com (Richard Houstan)
Subject: Re: BYU questions
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp.
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:29:05 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.144121.58870@cc.usu.edu> fulks@cc.usu.edu writes:
Path: javelin.sim.es.com!orca!uunet!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!cc.usu.edu!fulks
   From: fulks@cc.usu.edu
   Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
   Date: 14 Sep 92 14:41:21 MDT
   Organization: Utah State University
   Lines: 8



   If I am not mistaken, BYU lost two in a row last year to UCLA and
   Penn State.  By my calculation, that is also the last time BYU
   PLAYED two teams in a row!


They actually lost three in a row last year, FSU, UCLA, and Penn State.
By the way when was the last time uSU played a Team and ended up within 40 points?

					Richard