From: eidetics@nic.cerf.net (Eidetics Int'l)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER #75 of 80
Date: 4 Jan 1993 15:54:36 GMT
Organization: CERFnet Dial n' CERF Customer Group
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: nic.cerf.net

Posted by Jon Volkoff, mail address eidetics@cerf.net

"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording.  Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

This is the Dr. Beter AUDIO LETTER(R), 1629 K St. NW, Washington,
DC  20006.

   Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter.  Today is May 31, 1982,
and this is my AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 75.

   Here, in the United States, today is a major holiday, Memorial
Day.  For most of us it's a day off from our jobs, a day for
picnics or to visit friends and relatives.  The Memorial Day
week-end is famous for traffic jams, highway accidents, and the
Indianapolis 500 Auto Race.  And Memorial Day is a seasonal
turning point, marking the beginning of the traditional summer
vacation season.  Most of us tend to welcome Memorial Day as the
gateway to summer, but Memorial Day also has a more solemn
meaning which we sometimes forget.  It's the day we have set
aside to honor the Servicemen who have died fighting for our
country.  Memorial Day is a reminder that war has become a stark
reality for America time after time, and each time the cost in
human lives has been tragic.

   As I look ahead to the summer of 1982 now beginning, it's with
mixed feelings.  Like most other Americans, I'm looking forward
to the activities that make the summer vacation season a time to
enjoy; but the summer ahead will also be a time of increasing
danger for America.

   The timetable for nuclear war which I made public three months
ago in AUDIO LETTER No. 72 is still in effect, my friends.  That
timetable calls for NUCLEAR WAR ONE to erupt by mid-September
1982, barely three months from now.  The American Bolsheviks who
now control the United States Pentagon are not slowing down in
their war preparations.  This is true in spite of the fact that
part of their war plan has been crippled, as I detailed last
month.

   The covert warfare that spawned the so-called Falklands crisis
has all but ruined the Pentagon plans for final victory in the
coming war; but the Bolshevik war-planners here have a suicidal
streak in their thinking, and they are bent on war regardless of
the consequences.

   As I say these words, headlines are growing larger and larger
about the Falklands war between Argentina and Britain.  Since I
spoke to you last month, heavy losses have been reported on both
sides.  Argentina has lost her only cruiser, the General
Belgrano, plus several minor vessels and a number of aircraft. 
Britain has so far admitted losing five major ships--two
destroyers, two frigates, and a container ship full of war
materiel.  These reports reflect the scale of the present
fighting somewhat but they are incomplete and distorted.  As in
every war, the truth has become the first casualty.

   My three special topics for this AUDIO LETTER are:

Topic #1--THE PENTAGON COUNTDOWN TOWARD NUCLEAR WAR ONE
Topic #2--THE ECONOMIC ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
Topic #3--BILLY GRAHAM VERSUS THE BOLSHEVIK WAR LOBBY.

Topic #1--In AUDIO LETTER No. 73 two months ago I revealed that
an entire new nuclear war strategy against Russia is being
developed here in Washington.  It is being worked out by an elite
military-planning group in extreme secrecy under the code name
"PROJECT Z."  It's a rush project calling for NUCLEAR WAR ONE
itself to begin by September of this year 1982.

   Last month I reported that PROJECT Z was continuing to move
fast at the secret war-planning room here in downtown Washington. 
As I stated, the process of flushing out the basic war plan was
already under way.  Now, my friends, the first complete draft of
the total PROJECT Z war plan is ready.  The plan is essentially
completed with nothing left to do but make minor refinements here
and there.  And now the existence of this major new United States
nuclear war plan is creeping into the news.  Just yesterday, May
30, an article about it appeared for the very first time in the
New York Times.  The article, by Richard Halloran, carries the
headline, "PENTAGON DRAWS UP FIRST STRATEGY FOR FIGHTING A LONG
NUCLEAR WAR."  The article begins, quote:

  "Defense Department policymakers in a new five-year defense
plan have accepted the premise that nuclear conflict with the
Soviet Union could be protracted, and have drawn up their first
strategy for fighting such a war."

The article goes on to mention that the plan is laid out in an
unpublished document of 125 pages.  It's been drafted for
approval by Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger.

   My friends, I've reported many times now that the United
States Pentagon is controlled by the Bolsheviks who formerly
controlled Russia.  I've also identified Weinberger as the
highest visible agent of the Bolsheviks here in the United States
Government today.

   The nuclear war plans of the Bolsheviks here are moving fast;
but as I have also reported before, the United States Government
today is a house divided.  The Bolsheviks are opposed by their
bitter rivals, the Rockefeller cartel.  Their top visible
operative in the federal government today is Secretary of State
Alexander Haig.  The often visible feuding between Haig and
Weinberger is only a pale shadow of this deadly power struggle
behind the scenes.  Unlike the Bolsheviks here, the Rockefeller
faction do not want nuclear war.  In a word, they cannot afford
it.  They would lose everything, and so the Rockefeller faction
here is working feverishly to head off the Bolshevik nuclear war
plan.

   The new anti-Bolshevik rulers of Russia are also against
nuclear war.  The anti-Bolshevik, anti-nuclear-war attitudes of
the Rockefeller cartel and the Kremlin has led to a limited
coalition between them in recent months.  The most spectacular
result so far from this Rockefeller-Russian coalition is the
Falklands war now raging between Argentina and Britain.  In AUDIO
LETTER No. 74 last month I reported what the Falklands war is all
about.  It is the visible aftermath to covert warfare which took
place during April.  The Rockefeller cartel and the Russians
joined forces to destroy certain major military installations and
weapons reserves.  These were key ingredients in the final phase
of the PROJECT Z war plan.

   The whole operation began at South Georgia Island on April 3. 
With the help of Argentina a joint Rockefeller-Russian commando
team was able to knock out the giant hidden naval base there. 
The base, built during the 1960s, was originally controlled
through the United States Government by the Rockefeller cartel,
but the Bolsheviks here acquired control of the bases about three
years ago when they seized control of the American Pentagon.

   Last month I detailed how the attack on the base was carried
out.  It was contained within a giant man-made cavern hollowed
out inside a mountain near the water.  With the camouflaged ship
entrances sealed up, the base was bombproof; but the joint
Rockefeller-Russian commando team succeeded in attacking the base
by drilling a shaft through the mountain.  Then a compact Russian
neutron bomb was inserted through the shaft and detonated inside
the cavernous naval base.  The process took several weeks.  The
Thatcher government, which like the United States Pentagon is
Bolshevik controlled, dispatched the Royal Navy.  First, it was
supposed to dislodge the heavily-armed Rockefeller-Russian
military force before it could destroy the naval base; then it
was to move on to the Falklands for the publicly-admitted
fighting.

   The Royal Navy arrived several days too late to save the
secret base on South Georgia Island, as I reported last month;
but by that time the panicking Thatcher government had already
committed some two-thirds of the Royal Navy to the South
Atlantic.  On top of that, at least one British ship had already
been sunk by Russia in connection with the secret South Georgia
operation.  That left the Thatcher government with no choice but
to engage Argentina in battle, otherwise it would have been
impossible to explain away Britain's huge deployment to the South
Atlantic, much less the heavy losses which had been sustained.

   When I recorded AUDIO LETTER No. 74 last month on April 30 the
British blockade of the Falklands was just beginning.  Later that
day the entity President Reagan announced that the United States
was actively siding with Britain.  The announcement was a victory
for the Pentagon war faction.  Right away warfare around the
Falklands started heating up fast.  On May 1 the British launched
bombing raids against the airport at Port Stanley, and on May 2 a
British submarine torpedoed Argentina's second largest ship, the
cruiser General Belgrano.  It sank within 24 hours, leaving a
death toll of more than 300 Argentine sailors.  The sinking of
the Belgrano was expected to demoralize the Argentines, but
instead it enraged them.  The Belgrano had been sunk at a time
when it was not threatening the British forces.  The Argentines
decided it was time to start playing their ace in the hole
against Britain.

   Last month I reported that Argentina had been given certain
promises in return for making the secret South Georgia operation
possible.  One of these was the promise of covert military
assistance by Russia against Britain.  Specifically, it was
pledged that the Russians would intervene in parallel with
Argentine air and naval operations in ways designed to even the
odds.  In this way Argentina's military leaders can take full
credit for both their own and covert Russian attacks on the
British.  At the same time, this procedure is designed to keep
Russia's role in the fighting obscure.

   On May 4 the Argentine Air Force decided to put Russia's
promises to the test.  A pair of Fighter bombers headed out over
the Atlantic to attack the Royal Navy.  Acting on reconnaissance
data provided by Russian Spy Satellites, they headed straight for
the fleet.  As the two low-flying Argentine jets appeared on the
horizon, they were picked up by British fleet radar.  At the same
time, a Russian Cosmosphere hovering many miles above the fleet
took final aim at one of the ships.  The ship was one of
Britain's newest, most modern, most sophisticated ships, designed
specifically to shield the fleet against air attack.  The ship
was a Type-42 guided missile destroyer, H.M.S. Sheffield.  Long
before the two Argentine jets were close enough to attack, the
Cosmosphere fired its charged particle beam-weapon downward at
the ship.  The white-hot beam of subatomic particles blasted
through the aluminum superstructure just behind the bridge near
the top of the ship.  In a split second the beam seared through
layers of metal downward into the bowels of the ship.  The
aluminum of the ship itself was instantly ablaze.  The Argentine
Fighter pilots witnessed the spectacular explosion and intense
white flames from nearly 20 miles away.  They promptly turned
back toward home, having expended no missiles.  Bewildered
survivors from the Sheffield later said there had been no warning
before the blast.

   Argentina's leaders are being coached by Rockefeller cartel
operatives in what to say publicly about war developments.  They
claim that a French-made missile called the Exocet had been used
to sink the Sheffield; but to those who know the characteristics
of the Exocet missile, the Sheffield disaster remained a mystery.

   The Exocet, my friends, is a type of missile known as a
sea-skimmer.  It's designed to skim along just above the water,
striking a ship almost at the water line.  File films of the
Exocet which have been shown on TV clearly show this behavior. 
But the Sheffield was blasted close to the very top of the
superstructure; in fact, that is said to be the reason for the
relatively low casualty toll in the destruction of H.M.S.
Sheffield.  Had the same blast been aimed low close to the
waterline, the ship probably would have heeled over and sunk
fast.  Had that happened, very few of the crew would have
escaped.

   On the evening of May 4, Admiral Martin Wemyss, former
director of the British naval warfare, was interviewed about the
Sheffield disaster on ABC Nightline.  Ted Koppel began with the
words:

  "Admiral Wemyss, how is it that such a modern ship would not
have been able to first of all detect and then destroy that
Argentine aircraft?"

Admiral Wemyss answered, quote:

  "I think that's an extremely good question, and I cannot give
you a straight answer.  In my book, this should not have
happened."

   For the next two weeks talks between Argentina and Britain
continued with United Nations Secretary General Perez de Cuellar
attempting to mediate.

   Meanwhile, the Thatcher government continued to add to the
British armada in the South Atlantic.  Even the luxury liner
Queen Elizabeth II was commandeered and turned into a troop ship. 
It sailed with some 3200 troops aboard on May 12.

   The strategy of the Bolshevik-dominated Thatcher government is
very simple, my friends.  They know very well they are sending
the Royal Navy into a trap, but they believe that by multiplying
naval strength in the South Atlantic virtually beyond reason,
they will win.  They are making the British commitment so huge
compared to that of Argentina that a total Argentine rout of the
British would look unreasonable.  It would enable the question of
covert Russian aid to Argentina to be raised openly and credibly,
and that could help set off the very nuclear war which they know
Russia is trying to avoid.

   Following this brute-force strategy, the Thatcher government
has continued to pour every available ship into the South
Atlantic fray.  As of now, over 100 British ships are either in
the war zone or heading toward it.  That's almost the entire
Royal Navy!  The attitude is: for every ship the Russians and
Argentineans sink, the Thatcher government will just send two
more--anything to make sure Britain retakes the Falklands because
if that is not accomplished, the Thatcher government will fall
and that will be a setback to Bolshevik power in Britain.

   On May 19 the last ditch talks at the United Nations finally
collapsed.  Britain was ready at last to invade.  After talks
ended that evening, it was announced that the British War Cabinet
would meet the following morning.  Supposedly the meeting would
decide whether to give the go-ahead for invasion--but it was all
a ruse to help create an element of surprise against Argentina
and against Russia.

   The first stage of an elaborate invasion strategy was already
going into action.  On the evening of May 19 the British invasion
fleet was divided up into two groups--one group was 150 miles due
east of Port Stanley; the other, 100 miles to the northeast. 
Shortly before midnight Washington time, both invasion forces
started heading toward shore.  Russian Cosmospheres and
submarines went into action working together.  Both British
assault groups came under fire.  At least two ships critical to
the assault were hit and heavily damaged.  By 2:00 A.M.
Washington time both assault forces aborted their moves toward
the Port Stanley area.  In response, Russian forces disengaged. 
The Russians believed they had thwarted the British invasion;
but, my friends, they were wrong.

   The two large invasion groups threatening Port Stanley the
night of May 19 were actually carrying out a diversionary action. 
British strategists knew that the Russians had the muscle
available to stop any invasion.  The only chance of success lay
in convincing the Russians that they had stopped the invasion,
and then somehow sneaking troops ashore.  So the two large
invasion forces of May 19 actually were staging a decoy action! 
Most of the British invasion troops were no longer aboard the
troop carrier Canberra or the assault ships.  Instead, they had
been transferred to other ships which normally are not used for
amphibious purposes.

   On the morning of May 20 the elaborate British deception
continued.  Up until the previous day, British statements had
been referring to an imminent all-out invasion, but on the
morning of May 20 the statements changed abruptly.  British
Defense Ministry spokesmen suddenly started saying that the
British would confine themselves to small hit-and-run raids for a
while.  The Bolshevik military planners in London wanted to
further convince Russia that the invasion had been stopped the
previous night.  It worked.

   Small groups of British ships began moving around the
Falklands as if to plant small raiding parties here and there. 
In the early morning darkness of May 21 one of these small groups
of ships moved into the north end of Falkland Sound between the
Islands.  Contrary to press reports, the troop ship Canberra was
not among them, nor was an assault ship.  Those ships would have
tipped off the Russians monitoring everything from Cosmospheres
far above that a major landing was afoot.  Instead, the key ship
that moved into San Carlos Bay was the hospital ship Uganda. 
Under cover of darkness the Uganda moved close to shore.  British
assault troops, crammed like sardines into the Uganda, clambered
down the sides of the ship on rope ladders into motor launches. 
The launches ferried the troops a short distance ashore, one
group after another.  As soon as they were ashore, the troops had
orders to spread out fast.  In that way they rendered themselves
unsuitable targets for any attack by the Russian Cosmospheres
patrolling miles above.  Particle beam-weapons are devastating
against concentrated targets but very inefficient against
personnel scattered over a wide area.  By dawn other ships had
also disembarked troops in the same manner.  By the time daylight
revealed what was really going on, it was too late.  The British
invasion of the Falklands was underway.  Once the British got
ashore with a sizeable number of troops, Britain's chances of
regaining control of the Islands started increasing fast.  Covert
Russian help for the Argentines is much more feasible at sea and
in the air than on land.

   In the past 10 days we've heard about a number of devastating
air attacks by the Argentines.  Up to now the British have
admitted losing at least five ships plus several helicopters and
Harrier Jump-jets, but slowly the British ground forces have been
reinforced and started advancing across East Falkland Island
towards Port Stanley.  As of today, May 31, British ground forces
are said to be closing in on the main Argentine garrison at Port
Stanley.  The operation is being portrayed in the news here as a
relatively easy task, but that is far from true.

   British casualties in land battle have been far greater than
admitted, and at sea the Royal Navy has taken very heavy losses
that are not even hinted at so far in the news.  Many ships have
been badly damaged; and all--I repeat, ALL--of the original
contingent of the Sea Harrier Jump-jets have been put out of
action.  Both British aircraft carriers, the Hermes and the
Invincible, have been rendered incapable of launching jets.  The
Harriers now operating around the Falklands are a different type
from the sharp-nosed, blue-painted Sea Harriers.  They are
painted in green and brown camouflage.  My friends, they are
United States Marine Corps Harriers, and they are operating from
an American ship!

   The things I am revealing here, my friends, are at variance
with official stories, but this is the war you never see.  Photos
of British amphibious exercises taken at Ascension Island were
passed off as pictures of the Falklands invasion.  British
Broadcasting Corporation broadcasting facilities on Ascension
Island were taken over weeks ago by British military.  Now we
hear daily reports from Ascension Island that are claimed to be
originating with the task force.  Even more than usual, the truth
has been the first casualty in the Falklands war.

   The Bolshevik military planners here and in the Thatcher
government in Britain are trying to find some way to use the
Falklands war for their own purposes.  Up to now they still are
not slowing down in their fast timetable for NUCLEAR WAR ONE.

   Within a few short weeks there will be a highly visible clue
to the status of the Bolshevik nuclear war schedule.  I am
referring, my friends, to the upcoming fourth space shuttle
flight.  All the space shuttle flights up to now have been
military in nature, as I have detailed in the past.  The space
shuttle is the Pentagon's only hope to regain a military toe hold
in space for the coming war.  Now for the first time it is even
being admitted that the next shuttle flight will be military.

   Shuttle flight #4 is presently scheduled for June 27, less
than a month from now.  If some excuse is found to delay the
flight, it will reflect a slowdown in the nuclear war plans of
the Pentagon; but if Shuttle #4 takes off on schedule, it will
indicate that the Bolsheviks here are still sticking to their
September war-deadline.

   In AUDIO LETTER No. 73 I reported that for the first time the
shuttle had been successful in its prime military mission.  A
hardened laser-armed Super-Spy Satellite was orbited in March to
obtain fresh reconnaissance data on Russia.  It's the first
updating of Russian target data since Russia destroyed America's
Spy Satellites some four years ago.  Target data from the new
satellite has now been integrated into the PROJECT Z nuclear war
plan which I made public in AUDIO LETTER No. 73.

   Now, Space Shuttle #4 is being prepared for a different
mission.  Under the PROJECT Z war plan, the coming nuclear war
will begin with a surprise nuclear attack by American Stealth
planes into Russia.  They will attempt to knock out all of
Russia's space bases--four Cosmodromes for rockets plus
Cosmosphere installations in Siberia.  If all goes as planned,
all of these installations will be blown up with H-bombs
simultaneously.  As soon as that happens, the rest of America's
nuclear arsenal is to be launched at Russia, as I have described
before.

   But there remains one weak point in the Bolshevik first-strike
plan against Russia.  As it stands now, the Bolsheviks here will
have to assume that the first phase of the attack plan has
succeeded as of a given time.  The reason is that the United
States currently has no means of verifying if the initial Stealth
attack has succeeded.  When Russia destroyed America's Spy
Satellites four years ago she also destroyed our high-flying
Early Warning Satellites.  That leaves the Bolshevik war planners
hare without any way to tell if their bombs have exploded in
Russia.  Space Shuttle #4 is intended to solve that problem
within weeks from now!

   The supersecret Department of Defense pay load is a cryogenic
infrared Sensor System.  It's designed to look down at Russia
from geostationary orbit.  It will detect the explosions of
American H-bombs in Russia when it happens.  The moment that it
flashes a signal confirming the explosions to the Pentagon, the
rest of the American nuclear first-strike against Russia will be
set in motion.

   In order to do its job, the Air Force infrared Sensor has to
be placed in geostationary orbit.  That orbit is over 22,000
miles high over the equator.  The shuttle itself cannot go that
high; it can only go to low Earth orbit, perhaps 150 miles up. 
To take the Air Force Sensor System the rest of the way, it has
to be mounted on a rocket.  The shuttle will carry the whole
assembly--Sensor System, rocket, and all--into low Earth orbit. 
From there the rocket will take the Sensor System out to the
desired location far above the equator.

   My friends, as of now the countdown toward NUCLEAR WAR ONE is
still being continued by the Bolshevik war planners in the
Pentagon.  The Falklands crisis began as an effort to prevent or
delay nuclear war, but it may instead end up helping to set off
that very war!  If so, America's fourth space shuttle flight
could turn out to be America's final manned mission into space.

   The Air Force sensor to verify success of America's coming
initial attack on Russia will eventually be destroyed by Russian
space weapons.  Before that can happen, the Bolshevik planners in
the Pentagon will try to set off NUCLEAR WAR ONE.

Topic #2--For two months now the Falklands crisis has dominated
the news.  Likewise, the growing threat of nuclear war and
mounting anti-nuclear sentiment have been making headlines; but
for millions of Americans, a different crisis seems far more
important.  It is a long-term crisis which has been with us for
many years now.  This mounting crisis, my friends, is that of the
crumbling United States economy and the United States dollar.

   Just this month, May 1982, there has been all sorts of bad
news on the economic front.  On May 7 the Government announced
that unemployment, as officially calculated, had reached 9.4 per
cent, the highest level since the Great Depression.  And just
five days later there was another shock--Braniff Airlines
abruptly terminated operations and filed for bankruptcy.  It was
the first time ever that a United States trunk airline had
failed.  Braniff, like more and more other businesses, was
brought down by a mountain of debt.  With interest rates
remaining sky high in the midst of a deep recession, more and
more companies simply cannot survive.  Production cutbacks,
layoffs, and bankruptcies are continuing to spread, and more and
more people are losing their jobs.  This recession is especially
cruel because it is an inflationary recession.

   We're now living in the STAGFLATION era which I warned about
in my book THE CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE DOLLAR nearly ten years
ago.  The deliberate plans which were set in motion long ago to
destroy the United States dollar are now far advanced.

   Since 1970 the combined effects of inflation and taxes have
cut the purchasing power of the dollar by 55 per cent.  A family
of four living on $10,000 in 1970 would need well over $23,000 in
1982 just to stay even, and this historically unprecedented
collapse of the dollar is continuing even as people are thrown
out of work.

   For months now the battle over the federal budget has been
dragging on, day in, day out.  We're told constantly that the
budget is the key to bringing down the incredible interest rates
that are killing the economy, and yet somehow it seems that no
one can agree about what the budget should be.  One budget
proposal after another has come up for consideration only to be
voted down.  First, there was the Reagan Administration budget
which went nowhere.  Then all kinds of alternative budgets
started being proposed.  There have been Republican budgets,
Democrat budgets, Conservative budgets, Liberal budgets,
compromise budgets; and every single budget proposed so far has
been voted down.  There is more and more talk that the federal
budget process has gone sour, that there is something
fundamentally wrong.  On May 28 the entity President Reagan
denounced the budget process while he was in Santa Barbara,
California, to make a speech.  He said, quote:

  "The United States Government's program for presenting a
budget, or arriving at a budget, is about the most irresponsible,
Mickey-Mouse arrangement that any governmental body has ever
practiced.  It's called the 'President's Budget' and yet there is
nothing binding about it.  It is submitted to the Congress and
they don't even have to consider it."

   My friends, please note carefully how this criticism by the
President was phrased.  I suggest you stop your recorder and play
it back again because the entity Reagan was not just delivering a
standard political tongue-lashing at his political opponents.  He
was condemning the process itself, and he added, quote:

  "I think that some real solid thinking should be given now to a
budgeting process that befits the great government of a great
nation."

   My friends, Reagan's choice of Santa Barbara, California, for
this statement was symbolic.  It so happens that the so-called
"solid thinking" he recommended for a new budgeting process has
already been done; and as the President knows very well, that
thinking was done in Santa Barbara at a tax-exempt foundation
called the "Center for Study of Democratic Institutions."  That
is where the secret new Constitution for America was written,
including detailed new provisions for the budgeting process!

   Seven years ago in 1975 I published a pamphlet in which I
reviewed the secret new Constitution from a legal perspective. 
The entire text of the new Constitution is contained in the
pamphlet.  If you have a copy, you can read about the proposed
new budget process for yourself.  It's all there in black and
white.  Important passages to look at include:

   ARTICLE IV--THE PLANNING BRANCH, Sections 2, 4, and 7;
   ARTICLE V--THE PRESIDENCY, Section 1, and
   ARTICLE VI-(b)--THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Section 8.

   What you will discover if you trace through the budget process
described in the new Constitution is very significant.  When all
the legal-sounding mumbo jumbo is stripped away, the whole budget
process turns out to be firmly under the thumb of the President.

   For example, Reagan complained in Santa Barbara that the
"President's Budget", quote:

  "...is submitted to the Congress and they don't even have to
consider it."

   My friends, the secret new Constitution would fix that. 
ARTICLE VI-(b), Section 8 begins, quote:

  "The House shall consider promptly the annual budget."

What's more, the House is given no role in formulating the
Budget.  If they dare to object to anything, the Budget goes back
to the Planning Board, so called, controlled by, you guessed it,
the President.

   The Reagan blast about the budget process is just the latest
of an on-going series of covert moves to pave the way for the new
Constitution.  What makes this one more significant is that it is
tied in with powerful economic forces which are intended to speed
up the process.

   Through months of contrived haggling, the "kept" Congress has
been sensitizing Americans to the budget problem and they have
been doing it at a time when uncertainty over the Budget is being
blamed for worsening economic woes!

   Now along comes the President saying that the solution is to
change the whole process.

   The growing Budget crisis is also tied in with another major
change which the entity President Reagan has been publicly
advocating.  That change, my friends, is the proposed "Balanced
Budget Amendment" to our present UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

   There is a drive underway right now to call a Constitutional
Convention in order to introduce a balanced budget amendment. 
Already most of the required number of states have ratified the
call for such a convention!  At the moment, if just three (3)
more states ratify it, a Constitutional Convention will be
legally required to be called.  The excuse for calling a
Constitutional Convention would be to introduce the Balanced
Budget Amendment.  The problem is that once a convention is
called, there's no way to keep it from turning into a runaway
convention, re-writing the entire CONSTITUTION!  In fact, that's
exactly how our present UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION was created. 
The original idea was to simply amend the "Articles of
Confederation"; but once the Convention was through, a totally
new constitution emerged.

   Those who are behind the drive for a new Constitutional
Convention now want the same thing to happen again; and if it
does, they have their model for a carefully manicured
DICTATORSHIP Constitution ready to go!

   In the past there have been several other drives like the
present one to call a Constitutional Convention.  Each has been
built around some pet idea of one kind or another, but each time
the drive has fizzled out.  Enough people have recognized the
danger of a runaway Constitutional Convention to prevent its
happening.  This time, though, the danger is much greater than
ever before because this time the excuse for the proposed
convention is tied directly to people's pocketbooks.

   We're being told by various financial spokesmen on television
that high interest rates are responsible for our economic woes,
which is a half truth.  We are also told that government deficits
are responsible for keeping those disastrous interest rates high. 
Then we are treated to the spectacle of a government seemingly
unable to decide on a budget.  And, finally, whenever a budget is
passed, it will contain the biggest deficits in history--well
over one hundred billion dollars.

   Against that background, the promise of relief by way of the
Balanced Budget Amendment may prove too tempting to resist.  If
so, the drive to call a Constitutional Convention will succeed,
and in the process we Americans will have sold our birthright for
a mess of pottage!

   My friends, all of this may sound almost irrelevant right now
in view of the specter of possible nuclear war by the end of
summer, but never forget that the plans for war are the plans of
men, nothing more.  Those plans have a way of going awry in many
cases; and in the case of those nuclear war plans, feverish
attempts are underway to make them go awry.

   The Bolshevik war planners who control the Pentagon want
nuclear war; but their anti-Bolshevik enemies who now rule Russia
don't want war and are trying to prevent it.  Likewise, the
Rockefeller cartel here in America is in a power struggle against
the Bolsheviks in an attempt to stop the war plan.

   If the Rockefeller interests do succeed in regaining control
of the United States Government, they plan to stop the Bolshevik
war countdown.  But the Rockefeller group are fighting this
battle only for themselves, my friends, not for you or me!  It is
they who are behind the secret new Constitution and the drive for
a Constitutional Convention.  If they succeed in beating the
Bolsheviks here, they intend to capitalize.  With their secret
new Constitution they plan to bring us under their domination
more completely than ever before.

   In AUDIO LETTER No. 72 three months ago I reported that a
military coup d'etat was in gestation here in Washington.  This
is to be a coup by the Rockefeller cartel operatives within the
Government against Bolshevik operatives.  The man in charge is a
four-star General--Alexander Haig.

   Up to now the anti-Bolshevik coup has not been accomplished,
but it is gaining ground.  One major gain for the Rockefeller
faction occurred last month while all eyes were on the Falklands
crisis.  On April 21 it was announced that Admiral Bobby Inman,
Deputy Director of the CIA, had "resigned" (quote) effective
immediately.  Inman was forced out by the Rockefeller faction. 
He was replaced with lightning speed by John McMann, a career
professional with the CIA!

   It was the Rockefellers who created the CIA long ago as their
own private detective agency, and now they are working fast to
re-establish the control which they lost over the CIA three years
ago.

   The infighting between the Rockefeller and Bolshevik factions
within the Government is growing more intense as the war fuse
burns shorter and shorter.  President Reagan and Secretary Haig
are both under tight security.  This summer of 1982 will be
dangerous for them and for America.

Topic #3--On the evening of May 16 millions of Americans tuned
their television sets to NBC to watch the first installment of a
special mini-series.  It was a lavish portrayal of the travels
and adventures of Marco Polo.  For the next four nights viewers
were treated to a spectacular re-enactment of Marco Polo's
experiences as he traveled to China.  Interspersed with those
scenes of adventure and splendor were brief scenes depicting what
happened to Marco Polo after he returned home to Venice.  He
dared to speak of places he had been and things he had seen that
conflicted with the dogma of the day, and so he was tried for
heresy.

   Today in 1982 we like to think of ourselves as too enlightened
to close our minds like the inquisitors of Marco Polo, but the
fact is that even today those who challenge preconceived notions
are quickly branded as heretics and the like.  There was a
perfect example of this on Sunday morning May 16.  Ironically it
was the same day as the beginning of the Marco Polo series.  My
friends, I'm referring to the interview of evangelist Dr. Billy
Graham on the ABC news program "This Week with David Brinkley."

   Dr. Graham had just returned to England from participating in
a five-day religious conference in Moscow, Russia, of all places. 
He was one of more than 400 religious leaders from 80 nations who
attended the conference.  They were there at the invitation of
the Russian Orthodox Church which sponsored the Conference.  A
large fraction of those who attended were Christian leaders such
as Dr. Graham, but there were also many representatives of the
world's other great religions.  They were not there to convert,
to compete, or to condemn one another.  Instead it was a rare
opportunity for these leaders to form bridges of mutual
understanding, something which is all too often neglected in our
world.

   It was a religious conference the likes of which the world has
not seen for more than 80 years.  The last time anything like
this took place was before 1900.  It was held here in America, in
Chicago, and it was called "The Parliament of Religions."  There
were some who feared that historic meeting of the minds and have
condemned it  ever since.  As a result, it has never been
repeated here in America; but I submit, my friends, that those
fears were groundless.  The Parliament of Religions did not
destroy Christianity or turn Americans overnight into Buddhists,
Moslems, or Hindus.  What it did do was to establish bonds of
understanding and respect for a while where they had been lacking
before.  My friends, it is a psychological fact that it is
usually hard to hate another person if you get to know him.  That
is why any government bent on war tries to dehumanize and
depersonalize the enemy.

   From the turn of the century onward, the United States
Government has been controlled by elements who cherish war as an
instrument of policy, so we see no more Parliaments of Religion
here in America.

   By contrast, the government of Russia has undergone a drastic
transformation in recent years.  Russia's new rulers are
Christians, as I have been reporting for nearly five years. 
After an agonizing struggle of six decades, these tough native
Russians have finally gained the upper hand over the Satanic
Bolsheviks there.  Over three years ago the growing power of the
Kremlin Christians started producing startling changes in public. 
For example, for Easter 1979 Handel's "Messiah" was performed in
Russia for the very first time since the Bolshevik Revolution! 
And several months before that, in January 1979, the first legal
shipment of Bibles into Russia since 1917 had taken place.  The
American Bible Society had asked the Russian government for
permission, and it had been granted.

   In AUDIO LETTER No. 44 over three years ago I issued an appeal
to America's Christian leaders to take a stand for peace before
it was too late.  What I suggested was a "Pilgrimage for Peace"
to Moscow.  It's purpose would have been to begin new ties of
trust and understanding with the new Christian rulership of
Russia.  In that way America's churchmen had the opportunity to
take the initiative in a concrete way to help head off nuclear
catastrophe.  The response, as I reported later, was pathetic. 
To the everlasting shame of America's Christian community, only a
tiny handful of Christian leaders expressed any interest at all! 
The Christian leaders of America by and large refused to hold out
the hand of Christian fellowship to their brothers in Russia.

   But now, a pilgrimage for peace has been made to Moscow after
all.  Since America's Christian leaders would not bother to take
the initiative, those of Russia did so instead!  They invited
religious leaders the world over to make a pilgrimage for peace
to Moscow, and they called their five-day assembly the, quote:

  "Conference of Religious Workers for Saving the Sacred Gift of
Life from Nuclear Catastrophe."

   When Billy Graham and some other Western Christian leaders
arrived in Moscow, they soon discovered that it was not as they
had been led to expect.  Dr. Graham discovered that there was no
attempt to restrict him in his religious messages.  He was also
allowed more freedom of movement than he had expected.  On the
Saturday evening before the Conference began, Dr. Graham decided
to pay unannounced visits to several Moscow churches.  He went to
three different Russian Orthodox Churches and was shocked to find
that they were filled to capacity with worshippers.  As he said
later in a news conference, quote:

  "You would never get that in Charlotte, North Carolina."

Dr. Graham made a number of statements about his experiences in
Moscow which all seem to add up to one thing: there is a lot more
Christian worship going on in Russia than he apparently expected
and with greater freedom.

   When Billy Graham returned to the West he must have felt a
little like a religious Marco Polo.  He had journeyed to the
forbidden East and discovered that it is not populated by
gremlins and horrible beasts.  Instead he had come away with his
heart strangely "warmed" (quote).  Perhaps he expected that the
folks back home would welcome his unexpected good news.  After
all, our whole Christian faith is built on Good News--the Gospel
of our LORD Jesus Christ.  But if that is what Billy Graham
expected, he was sadly mistaken.

   When he returned to the West, he came back not to people eager
to hear more of his good news, but to hostility and condemnation! 
We're always told that Russia is an atheistic country and beyond
redemption, and so by definition Billy Graham's words about even
limited religious freedom in Russia constituted heresy.  He ran
into a buzz saw of critics determined to cut him down for saying
a good word about Russia!

   It began right away with slanted reports about his statements
in the major media.  At one point Dr. Graham mentioned that in
Russia his comments had been reported accurately in the press. 
By contrast, reports here in the United States were distorted,
and quoted him out of context.

   A perfect example of the treatment now being given Dr. Graham
was his May 16 interview on ABC's "This Week with David
Brinkley."  It was called an interview, but inquisition would be
a better description.  Every suggestion that Christians may be
better off in Russia today than in the past was met with
hostility.  Time after time after time Dr. Graham was interrupted
and attacked before he could even finish making his point, and
many of the questions in the best tradition of heresy trials were
designed to declare Graham guilty before he could even answer!

   To take just one example: at one point the ideological writer
George F. Will mentioned an incident in which a peace protestor
was subdued by Russian police.  Then he asked--and this is an
exact quote:

  "Given that evidence that there is no, and is not about to be,
any peace movement in the Soviet Union, wasn't it clear to you
from the start that this propaganda festival to which you were
going was used simply to encourage a unilateral peace pressure
and disarmament pressure in the West?"

My friends, a so-called question like that is the tool of a
prosecutor, not an objective reporter.  In one breath he claimed
that there is no peace movement in Russia as if it were a fact,
accused Dr. Graham of knowingly cooperating in Soviet propaganda,
implied that all the world religious leaders who attended were
stooges, and ignored the world-wide representation at the
Conference saying it was all aimed at the West.  Accusing
questions like that were fired at Dr. Graham throughout the
program.  The only break in this inquisition came when Dr. Graham
was removed from the discussion for a while--then everyone else
sat around and ripped him up one side and down the other in his
absence, for his 'heresies.'

   In spite of the grossly unfair treatment, Rev. Graham made
some very telling points.  He mentioned that many other American
Christian leaders were also at the Moscow Conference and that
still others have gone there separately, and he said there are
many, quote:

  "...that would hold different viewpoints than what is being
expressed here today.  I'm a little surprised that we don't have
some of those people."

Perhaps Dr. Graham's most telling comment came fairly early in
the program; perhaps it was partly responsible for the frenzied
bitterness of some of the attacks on him later in the program. 
Rev. Graham said, and I quote:

  "Now when people go to China today, for example, they are
applauded for going to China.  It's wonderful to go to China, but
there is not as much religious freedom in China as there is in
the Soviet Union."

   My friends, Billy Graham was exactly right in that statement. 
I have reported the same thing in my AUDIO LETTER reports.  The
favorable image now being given to Red China is purely political
and military in its origins.  Unfortunately some church-related
groups are being used for these political purposes!

   What Dr. Graham may not know is the reason for the violent
attacks he has endured lately.  My friends, he has run afoul of
the American Bolshevik nuclear-war lobby here.  They want to use
you and me to do their dirty work for them against Russia.  That
is what their nuclear-war plans are all about, and so at all
costs they must not let us know that Christianity is reviving
today in Russia.  Even more, they dare not let the American
people know that the true leadership of Russia today is Christian
because if we all knew that, my friends, we would never agree to
their plans to destroy Christian Russia in a thermonuclear war.

                       LAST MINUTE SUMMARY

   Now it's time for my Last Minute Summary.  In this AUDIO
LETTER I've tried to bring you up to date on the progress of
plans to throw America into nuclear war against Russia.  The
countdown by the Bolshevik war planners who now control the
Pentagon is still continuing.  Their war plans have been damaged
by the Falklands war, but they are trying to turn that conflict
to their own ends.

   Meanwhile, the countdown for Space Shuttle Flight #4 with its
secret military pay load is still on schedule.  If the mission
succeeds, the danger of nuclear war will increase dramatically.

   The summer of 1982, my friends, promises to be a dangerous
time for America.  As of now, NUCLEAR WAR ONE could be as little
as three months away, but the Bolsheviks here have enemies who
are trying to stop the war-countdown.

   Here in the United States the Rockefeller cartel is continuing
its power struggle to take back control of the Government from
the Bolsheviks.  As part of that struggle, the preparations for a
military coup d'etat led by General Alexander Haig are making
progress.  Likewise, the Russians are continuing to try in their
own ways to prevent the war.  Unlike the Rockefeller cartel, the
Russians are doing this for moral reasons.

   This month, May 1982, religious leaders from around the world
gathered in a religious conference to take a stand for peace.  If
the conference had been held, say in Washington, D.C., we would
be hearing nothing but praise about it; but it was held instead
in Moscow, Russia, and for that reason alone it has been
condemned here in the United States.  Those who dare to honestly
report the favorable surprises they encountered there are being
castigated as heretics.  The most visible of these is Rev. Billy
Graham.  For describing what he actually saw and experienced,
honestly and without prejudice, he is being crucified on all
sides.

   My friends, the same thing will happen to you if you dare to
speak up about the things you know; but if you do not speak up to
your friends, to your neighbors, to your relatives, they may
never know why we are heading toward nuclear catastrophe.  So I
urge you to speak now, and remember the promise of our LORD Jesus
Christ.  He said:

  "Blessed are they who are persecuted for righteousness' sake:
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven."

   Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter.  Thank you,
Xref: sparky alt.conspiracy:13896 alt.atheism:25522 talk.politics.misc:66925