HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: Re: Wonderful Life
Date: 13 Sep 92 14:54:34 GMT
Reply-To: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Organization: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
In-reply-to: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)

In article <88645@netnews.upenn.edu>, weemba@sagi (Matthew P Wiener) writes:
>Actually, WL is a poor book in many respects, and I consider it Gould's
>worst.  His portrayal of Burgess is ridiculous.  It is _provable_ that
>Burgess was not trapped in some 19th century shoehorn, preventing him
>from recognizing what he discovered.  Burgess was, after all, the one
>who separated the trilobites from the crustaceans.  [...]

You're all too kind.  Read the above article with s/Burgess/Walcott/ as
appropriate.

While I'm here, let me further add another difficulty with Gould's claim
regarding the 19th century shoehorn that Walcott was allegedly trapped
by.  Phyletic reclassification was a major ongoing zoological project
throughout the 19th century.  It's almost impossible to have a shoehorn
under such circumstances--you shoehorn into a shoe, not a galosh.

Another weakness regarding Gould's explanations for Walcott's failure is
that Gould does not mention the value to Whittington of a half-century
of previous confusion.  Taxonomic classification is a subtle combination
of the subjective and objective.  A half-century of studied agreement is
a good sign that the subjective factors are not a problem.  A half-century
of disparate reconstructions is a sure sign that more objective facts are
needed.  Walcott was, of course, not in any position to see this.
-- 
-Matthew P Wiener (weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu)
From: boz@coos.dartmouth.edu (John Boswell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: Re: Used bookstores Providence, R.I.?
Date: 13 Sep 92 00:16:11 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

leavitt@jevex.waisman.wisc.edu writes:

>I will be in Providence in a few weeks and would
>appreciate recommendations on used-books stores there.

>Thanks in advance,
>Lewis

Try OtherWorlds Bookstore on South Main Street.  It's SF, but part of the
store is owned by another partner, and carries mysteries...


--
****************************************************************************
Dr. John Boswell	John.S.Boswell@dartmouth.edu (preferred address)	
Dept. of Medicine/GI MCN C2104	BOSWELJS@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu (alternate)	
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN  37232	615-343-4747
From: jov@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM (Jim Vadeboncoeur)
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 00:08:51 GMT
Subject: Bud Plant Illustrated Books
Organization: HP Stanford Park - Palo Alto, CA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books

Just a note for fans of the illustrated book:

If you like the classic illustrations of:
  N.C. Wyeth
  Arthur Rackham
  Willy Pogany
  Maxfield Parrish

or the modern fantacists like:
  Frank Frazetta
  Boris Vallejo
  Michael Kaluta
  Berni Wrightson

or the comic strip art of:
  Walt Kelly
  Alex Raymond
  Hal Foster

or the great illustrators of the 30's like:
  Rockwell Kent
  Lynd Ward
  John Vassos

you might be interested in Bud Plant Illustrated Books, a mail order 
business serving the out-of-print market for five years.  We specialize
in books illustrated by the above and many others, plus reference books
about illustrators and out-of-print comic-related material.

We publish 2 to 3 catalogs a year with approximately 1000 items per catalog.
Price of admission is $2 for three catalogs (or an indefinte number if you
continue to order).

Our address is:  Bud Plant Illustrated Books
                 c/o Jim Vadeboncoeur, Jr.
                 3809-N Laguna Ave.
                 Palo Alto, CA 94306

Direct inquiries about specific books can be made by phone:

*************************************
*  EVENINGS (after 5:30 PM) and     *
*  WEEKENDS only #PLEASE#           *
*                                   *
*      415-493-1191                 *
*************************************

Want Lists are welcome (limit: 5 books), but must include an evening phone no.

Thanks for reading this.     Peace,  Jim (|:{>
From: wojdylo@maths.uwa.oz.au (INFIDEL)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: Re: Androgyny & The Arts
Date: 14 Sep 1992 06:05:08 GMT
Organization: The University of Westrn Australia
NNTP-Posting-Host: madvax.maths.uwa.oz.au

fi@grebyn.com (Fiona Webster) writes:

>Francis quotes a blurb pertaining to Woolf's "A Room of One's Own":
>>	"The male chauvinist and the militant feminist were alike
>>	incapable of producing good fiction...Great artists, Virginia
>>	Woolf asserted, were androgynous, their minds were unimpeded,
>>	and their imagination incandescent. And androgyny could only
>>	exist when one had intellectual freedom, and that freedom
>>	depended upon material things, the most fundamental metaphors
>>	of which were five hundred pounds a year and a room of one's
>>	own."

>I've been puzzling over this for a while now.  Curious that the author
>would choose such hackneyed, emotionally charged phrases as "male
>chauvinist" and "militant feminist" to set up in contrast to mental
>and imaginative androgyny (whatever that is).  My usual response to
>anyone who insists on maleness as superior to femaleness, or vice
>versa, is to mumble, "Methinks he doth protest too much."  In other
>words, I wonder (don't you?) whether an outspokenly "macho" male, for
>example, is secretly conflicted about his heterosexuality, and
>frightened of the female traits he encounters within himself.  Such
>conflicts, as we know well from such examples as Hemingway, can
>often lead to excellent fiction.  Androgyny in a state of total
>freedom might be too self-accepting, too content, to sustain the
>passion that gives rise to good storytelling.  

Methinks thou doth protetht too muthch.

A totally free person has no need to write.



>.  If the money for time and a "room of one's own" is available,
>then what remains to justify calling androgyny a useful quality in
>the artist?  If a mind is "unimpeded," then what will drive the com-
>pulsion to write?  And can one not write with passion, while remaining
>very much invested in a set of (supposedly) female, or male, virtues?


I love her cunt. I love her tits. I love the small facial line near the corner
of her mouth when she smiles. I love the part of her sideburn which runs
out of hair and becomes her cheek. I love the back of her neck which
has white hair that tells a premonition of her old age. I love the
ravaged skin of her face, life's experiences etched forever and for all
to see. I love her defiant earing. I love her intelligence.

JW



Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: rjwill6@PacBell.COM (Rod Williams)
Subject: Re: Chautauqua ? (Zen & the Art...)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Francisco
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 20:19:35 GMT

> fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis) writes:
>> mike.siemon writes:

>> Admittedly, "upstate New York" means anything outside the five boroughs
>> (and probably also excludes Lon Gisland), but it should be noted that
>> Chatauqua is a few miles south of Lake Erie, on a feeder lake named,
>> oddly enough, Chatauqua) and equally few miles east of the westernmost
>> border of New York.  It's about 100 miles northeast of Cleveland, and
>> that is perhaps the best localization of its ethos.
>
>Is this a slur on Cleveland? I don't understand. Cleveland has a
>rather undeserved reputation for unsavoriness, but it is -- in fact --
>the most culturally diverse city in the country. Very European...

Pshaw!  Since when did "Very European" come to mean "most
culturally diverse"?  I have this image of fifth-generation
Slavic Americans indulging in a General Foods International
Coffee Moment(tm), with Julio Iglesias on the radio...
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
rod williams -=- pacific bell -=- san francisco -=- rjwill6@pacbell.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: v096my2q@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BUSTER)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: publishing
Date: 10 Sep 92 21:08:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

I have a collection of short stories and poems that I would like to submit to a
publishing company of some sort. I have no idea in how to go about doing this
and was wondering what the procedures are. Specifically I would like to know
if there is a fee to have someone read ones work and also what publishing
companies to send work to. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Mark
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: Re: Editors other than Bowdler...
From: liam@durie.amigans.gen.nz (Liam Greenwood)
Date: 8 Sep 92 23:11:37 GMT+12
Distribution: world
Organization: It's Home, really...

    All this talk about uncut versions...

    Just recently I noticed versions of Heinleins' "Stranger in a Strange
Land" which have words on the cover like uncut, as he wrote it etc. Could
(...and, of course, would) anyone tell me what is included in this version
as opposed to the more common version?
--
 Liam Greenwood ------ liam@durie.amigans.gen.nz ------ Wanganui, N.Z.
                 Don't tell my Mother I'm a programmer,
               she thinks I'm a piano player in a brothel

Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: francis@oas.stanford.edu (Francis Muir)
Subject: Re: Arthurian Reading List FAQ
Organization: Stanford Exploration Project
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 13:25:37 GMT

Cindy Tittle Moore writes:

	My criterion for these books is that it be concerned with 
	the Arthur legend in some way.  I have five categories here: 
	novelizations (fiction), poetry, non-fiction (eg, studies), 
	related and Celtic tales. In general, related stories are 
	acceptable such as Tristam and Iseult.  

I continue to be amazed that Ms Moore omits Thomas Love Peacock's
*The Misfortunes of Elphin* from the fiction section, and for me at 
least this brings into question the worth of this Reading List. With
the help of his wife, Jane Gryffydh of Maentwrog, Peacock learned
enough Old Welsh to study the Mabinogion, and with this behind him
he was able to construct a novel that is both steeped in the Arthurian
legend and of great literary merit -- which cannot be claimed for most
on the fiction (novelizations!) list.

							Fido

Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: tmaddox@netcom.com (Tom Maddox)
Subject: Re: books to avoid
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 08:00:53 GMT
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)

In article <25709@castle.ed.ac.uk> egpv29@castle.ed.ac.uk (JHenderson) writes:
>One filtering algorithm that might seem useful is to buy a novel by the
>writer of a short story that you have greatly enjoyed. But this is far
>from foolproof, right Tom?

	Resisting all obvious plays on the word "foolproof," Jeremy, I'll
just remark that I think the method works just fine.


-- 
				Tom Maddox
		    	    tmaddox@netcom.com
		   "I swear I never heard the first shot"
                Wm. Gibson, "Agrippa:  a book of the dead"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: rcj@engin.umich.edu (R o d Johnson)
Subject: Re: Damned lit yokels
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 22:50:43 EDT
Organization: Lost Tribes of Gazebo

In article <UIgFr*u50@prolix.apana.org.au> dac@prolix.apana.org.au (Andrew Clayton) writes:

>In article <1992Sep10.195556.20675@infonode.ingr.com>, James
>Brock's friend, Mr 'Arrogant newbie fuck' writes:

[Fake Salinger diatribe deleted]

It's amusing to see this (admittedly rather limply executed) joke
whooshing over head after head here.  Though not, in dac's case,
altogether a surprise.

-- 
       Rod Johnson  *  rcj@caen.engin.umich.edu  *  (313) 764-3103
    
                "What I do doesn't happen in a warehouse"
                                          --Jim Dickinson
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: fi@grebyn.com (Fiona Webster)
Subject: Re: books to avoid
Summary: "rock-n-roll and cola wars"
Organization: Grebyn Timesharing
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 20:19:52 GMT

Meg Worley writes:
>Travel writers are particularly susceptible to...
[rest of sentence left as an exercise for the reader]

For no more logical reason than the appearance herein of the
word _travel_, I choose to bury my "Hi, I'm back from Hawaii!"
announcement in this thread.  Hawaii, you say?  I know, it's
disgusting of me, even to admit it, but I spent a whole *month*
in a beachside cottage on the windward side of Oahu; and boy,
do I ever feel refueled.  I had to attach an auxiliary tank, in
fact, just to bring home all the extra energy I accumulated.

More later on Hawaii's influence on literature (after the books
I purchased arrive in the mail), but to keep some fidelity to
the "travel writer" notion, while departing 180 degrees from the
"books to avoid" notion, I recommend a collection of personal essays
by Pico Iyer, titled _Video_Night_in_Kathmandu_ (_And_Other_Reports_
_from_the_Not-So-Far_East_).  The copyright's 1988, so y'all may
already know of this one, but here's the scoop: Iyer's brilliant (if
now slightly dated) concept is to cover not so much the East itself,
as the interaction of tourists, especially Western pop culture, with the
East.  In other words, he's reporting from the front lines of the
war(s) fought (and won with great glory, according to such reliable
sources as P.J. O'Rourke) by Coca-Cola and Mickey Mouse.  For sheer
quantity and density of details, I doubt anyone else can compete with
Iyer.  He has separate chapters on Bali, Tibet, Nepal, China, the
Philippines, Burma, Hong Kong, India, Thailand, and Japan, with
essays titled "Love Match" and "The Empire Strikes Back" as interpretive
bookends.  Much of what he describes is disturbing, and almost all of
it is hilarious--a gaudy, bittersweet stew that was much to my liking.

Iyer helped me feel glad that if Hawaii is being raped and plundered
by ugly Americans, well, at least it's our own country we're doin'
it to.  I'm not especially a fan of the Paul Theroux, Bruce Chatwin,
whomever, style of travel essay, either: these are different--much
more familiar in their images--even if the familiar pops up in the
strangest of places.  My only complaints about Iyer are that he needs
an editor (he's at least as verbose and repetitious as a certain F.
Webster), and that he gets bummed out too much, then tells us about it.
But, as I said before (there she goes), the *details* are primo.

'Hope y'all had a good August, however you spent it.  I'm glad to
be back!

							--Fiona
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: cb@tamarack13.timbuk (Chris Brewster)
Subject: Re: NPR & Freedom of the Press: Part I
In-reply-to: james@brock.b17b.ingr.com's message of Sat, 5 Sep 1992 19:36:03 GMT
Organization: pubs
	<1992Sep5.193603.10848@infonode.ingr.com>
Date: 8 Sep 92 13:04:40 CDT

James Brock writes:

   Francis: You advise me to throw out my copy
   of *Sons and Lovers.* I consider this rash.
   Compare the two versions. It seems that 
   the editors (the couple, living I think
   in Provence) were too enthusiastic about 
   their edition. Of course they want everyone to rush
   out and buy the new $25 Cambridge edition.

Same thing applies to the two versions of Wolfe's _Sister_Carrie_.
There was a lot of hype about the new edition, but the differences from
the older standard printing are totally insignificant.

Chris Brewster
cb@cray.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: twain@milton.u.washington.edu (Barbara Hlavin)
Subject: Re: books to avoid
Summary: Misleading claims on book jackets 
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 03:02:04 GMT

In article <a3pn0#-.dani@netcom.com> dani@netcom.com (Dani Zweig) writes:
>"In the tradition of ..."

On the other hand, testing your skepticism of book jacket claims by 
reading a page or two can sometimes lead you down wonderful paths of 
exploration and adventure. 

Years ago I was looking over some books on a rack in a supermarket (can't 
pass up the books, uh-UH).  Attracted by the title THE GATES OF THE 
FOREST, I picked up the book and read on the front, "Not since Albert 
Camus has there been a writer of such moral sensitivity blah-blah-blah..." 

"Oh, *yeah*?" sneered one of the biggest fans Camus ever had on the North 
American continent; "I'll bet!"  And, opening the book and reading the 
first page, I found myself helplessly hooked. 

I have in the ensuing years read eveyrthing Elie Wiesel publishes, learning 
in the process perhaps more about Hassidic Judaism than I strictly need 
to know. 

But I'm also a fan of Isaac Bashevis Singer, for the understanding of whose 
books a knowlege of Hassadism has been helpful. 

By the way, for those looking for entertaining autobiographies let me 
recommend Singer's IN MY FATHER'S COURT, the enchanting story of this 
son of a devout rabbi growing up in a Jewish ghetto of 19th century 
Poland.  To a child for whom the observance of her own religion was 
strictly a Sunday Thing, this introduction to another child who lived 
and breathed his very complicated religious obligations, for whom every 
ordinary act was perfumed and empowered with the mystery of the presence 
of God, was downright erotic. 

--Barbara  (who believes Barbra Streisand should be flogged for what 
she did to "Yentl the Yeshiva Girl") 


P.S. I know that Fiona has met Wiesel, but have any of the rest of 
you heard him read or lecture?  He has the most beautiful male voice 
I have ever heard in my life.  I heard him speak in the Wilshire 
Synagogue in 1976 and honest to God, I would have followed him anywhere.
 
Caedmon has recorded him, for those who are interested in enchantment.  

Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: jmc@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (John McCarthy)
Subject: Re: The White Man's Burden of Proof
Reply-To: jmc@cs.Stanford.EDU
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
Date: 6 Sep 92 15:47:22

Indeed I hope someone will tell me what poem "insidious intent" is
from.  When you use a literary allusion you risk that someone might
not get it.  Perhaps its use in the poem excludes the possibility
that Taranto was suggesting that Cramer's assertion that the ancient
Greeks were white disguised an assertion that blacks are inferior
and for that reason should be discriminated against.

For the future, expect me not to be well read in poetry.
--
John McCarthy, Computer Science Department, Stanford, CA 94305
*
He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: donofrio@nereid.sal.ists.ca (Frank D'onofrio)
Subject: Zorba is not the hero?
Followup-To: none
Summary: Then who is?
Organization: Space Astrophysics Laboratory, ISTS, Toronto, Canada
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 17:24:37 GMT

Hi there!  A while ago, somebody wrote that Zorba was not the hero
of Zorba the Greek.  I can't remember who it was, but this person wrote
that the book was dangerous because its easy to think that Zorba is the
hero.  I'd love to read any opinions on this.

Frank
The Bocca Demon

Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
From: ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charles Blair)
Subject: Re: Garnett, Garnett, Garnett & Garnett
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 13:53:12 GMT

francis@oas.stanford.edu (Francis Muir) writes:

>Richard Garnett may still be remembered
>for his novel *Twilight of the Gods*...

    TWILIGHT OF THE GODS is a short story collection, which I really
liked.  I would guess that the most frequently anthologized piece in
it is "The Elixir of Life."
From: kj@nwu.edu (Kathy Johnson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: Re: "Genius": Feynman bio
Date: 15 Sep 92 12:56:33 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.books
Organization: Info Services, Northwestern Univ.

In article <14SEP199214401180@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov>,
calvo@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov (Sherri Calvo) wrote:
> 
> Yes, and has anybody read "Tuva or Bust" about Feynman's last road 
> trip with Leighton? It made a brief appearance in a retail-price 
> bookstore I occasionally browse in, but I didn't buy it, figuring it 
> would eventually show up in the Science Book Club circular. Well, it hasn't, 
> and I haven't seen it anywhere else, either. Is it worth chasing?
> 
> (For calibration purposes, I also read and enjoyed Feynman's two 
> autobiographical works.)
> 
> Sherri
> 
> Sherri Chasin Calvo
> calvo@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov

I received "Tuva" as a Christmas gift and read it over the holiday - a
delightful little book which contains glimpses of events Feynman related in

"Surely You're Joking" and "What Do You Care."  It's worth chasing - it was
special ordered for me.  I'm looking forward to the new bio too.

Kathy Bates Johnson
Office of Information Services
Northwestern University
kj@nwu.edu
From: wojdylo@maths.uwa.oz.au (INFIDEL)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: Re: The White Man's Burden of Proof
Date: 15 Sep 1992 06:34:10 GMT
Organization: The University of Westrn Australia
NNTP-Posting-Host: madvax.maths.uwa.oz.au


P.S.  Happy 65'th birthday to Johnno.


	Happy birthday to you
	Happy birthday to you
	You think like a UniVac
	and you LISP like one too.


Infidel.
From: spb0457@zeus.tamu.edu (SubGenius)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: Re: Yet another tangent
Keywords: Every humour in Jonson
Date: 11 Sep 1992 19:07:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

sometimes a Wombat writes...
>This reminds me of the flyting of John Sylvester and Ben Jonson.  The
>former challenged the great playwright to a constest of impromptu
>insulting rhymes, giving as an example
>	I John Sylvester
>	Lay with your sister.
>To which Master Jonson replied
>	I Ben Jonson
>	Lay with your wife.
>When Sylvester protested that that didn't rhyme at all, Jonson said,
>"No, but it is TRUE."
>	The easily amused Mr. E------

+-------------------------------------SubG----------------------------------+
Ben was the one for eloquence, whot?

Like Dr. Subtle's, "I fart at thee!"

But, truth be told, I find it a bit shocking that Mr. Jonson didn't just
kill Sylvester when he made that crack about his sister.  I hear tell
he was wont to do that sort of thing.







Yours etc.,







SubGenius
From: mike@maths.tcd.ie (Mike Rogers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: Re: utopias and distopias
Date: 15 Sep 92 19:47:48 GMT
Organization: none

In article <1992Sep15.134223.12457@wam.umd.edu>, sheilah@wam.umd.edu (Sheila Herndon) wrote:
>... What I'm really interested in is more modern utopia-writing, especially
>>science-fiction: are there classic sci-fi utopia texts?
>Ian Mcdonald >>Out on Blue Six<<
>Pat Murphy >>The City, Not Long After<< (? perhaps doesn't fit category)

Russo		Subterranean Gallery
Le Guin		The Dispossessed
Sterling	Schismatrix
Wingrove	Chung Kuo

are some of my favourites
-- 
Mike Rogers,Box 6,Regent Hse,##EveryoneHasTheRightToFreedomOfOpinionAndExpressio
TCD,EIRE. <mike@maths.tcd.ie>##nThisRightIncludesFreedomToHoldOpinionsWithoutInt
###############################erferenceAndToSeekReceiveAndImpartInformationAndI
deasThroughAnyMediaAndRegardlessOfFrontiers...#10 UN Declaration of Human Rights
From: lnh@soliton.physics.arizona.edu (sometimes a Wombat)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: Re: books to avoid
Date: 9 Sep 92 15:48:50 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Society for the Appreciation of Janni Lee Simner


"In the tradtion of ... "

	Larry "In the tradition of running away" Hammer
--

LNH@physics.arizona.edu          \  "One like a wombat prowled obtuse
The insane don't need disclaimers \  and furry"  --Christina Rossetti
From: danoc@earlybird.Eng.Sun.COM (Dan O'Connell [CONTRACTOR])
Newsgroups: rec.arts.books
Subject: Re: books to avoid
Date: 9 Sep 1992 20:43:43 GMT
Organization: Subvert the Dominant Paradigm, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: earlybird

(Meg Worley) writes:
 I long ago learnt to steer clear of books that were described on
 their covers as "wickedly funny" or any variation of "rollicking"
 or "romp", David Lodge being to one to bring the lesson home
 most painfully.
... 
 But I did not write solely to vent my spleen.  What other phrases
 get up your nose or otherwise serve to prevent you, like Socrates'
 divine sign, from making sorry mistakes?
 
     "heart-warming"
     "must-read"
     "Never Before"
     "Absolute"
     "A Cross Between ...."
     "At Last ... "
     "Torrid"
     "New Thinking for/about"
     "...of the year/century/decade"


Dano