HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: failsafe@cellar.org (Failsafe)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 and Stacker
Date: 10 Apr 92 01:31:45 GMT
Organization: The Cellar BBS and public access system

ruben@pollux.cs.uga.edu (<== FireIce ==>) writes:

> Talking about smartdrive... how do you get version 4?
> From Microsoft?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Ruben Robles                          =
> UGA Comp Sci                          =
> Athens, GA                            =
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=

You do get it from Microsoft. Comes with a nice freebie, Windows 3.1!


Steve Roth
Philadelphia, PA.

------
failsafe@cellar.org (Failsafe)
The Cellar BBS - (215) 654-9184
From: nsus_cif@troi.cc.rochester.edu (Nick Susch)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: WinQVT 4.77 HUGE font!
Date: 14 Apr 92 20:22:19 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

I am trying out WinQVT 4.77 as a terminal program, and it is really nice,
but I can only seem to be able to use the ANSI font. If I switch to the DEC
for in the setup, the text becomes so HUGE that the terminal screen will no
longer fit on the screen! Is there anyway to make the DEC character set
smaller? I am running in 1024x768 mode, so resolution is not the problem. I
have a Tseng ET4000 board, and Windows 3.1. Has anyone else come accross
this problem? Thanks for any help.

--
They say there is strangeness to danger us | /\/ick Susch - U. of Rochester
In our theatres and bookstore shelves,     | nsus_cif@uhura.cc.rochester.edu
That those who know what's best for us     | nsus_cif@uordbv.bitnet
Must rise and save us from ourselves.      | ... !rochester!ur-cc!nsus_cif
				   -RUSH   	
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: steves@lowell.cs.unlv.edu (Steven Sowards)
Subject: NDW v.1 & Win v.3.1 
Reply-To: steves@lowell.cs.unlv.edu (Steven Sowards)
Organization: UNLV Computer Science and Electrical Engineering
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 17:24:49 GMT

I have just recieved Windows 3.1 and installed it on my computer. 
I have been using Norton Desktop and it continued to work fine 
until the next morning.  I was cleaning  some files off of my 
hard disk after installing win3.1, and then the next morning, NDW
would not come up.  The error is as follows (or as close as I 
can remember):

Application Error
NDWMAIN caused Aplication Fault Error in NDW.DLL

I have taken the following action to recover files that I may have
been foolish enough to erase:
- reinstalled Windows 3.1
- reinstalled Norton Desktop
- compared old System.Ini to new System.ini

It is possible that I changed the System.Ini file also.  
I have looked at apps.hlp that comes with win3.1 and the line 
in the system.ini file it says to change is correct.  
Any help would be appreciated!

If all else fails, I'll NDW v2.0 on friday, but I would still
like to know what is going on!

Thanks
-- 
	 Steve Sowards                 | 
	 UNLV, Electrical Engineering  | steves@cs.unlv.edu
     "You've never been in the private sector... they expect results!"
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: linville@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (John W. Linville)
Subject: Re: Windows does not multitask (repost)
Organization: NCSU CATT Prog  
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 15:07:39 GMT

In article <!6wj-!q.garyd@netcom.com> garyd@netcom.com (Gary Dietz) writes:
>Windows ain't Multi-tasking, dudes and dudettes!

>I work for a company that creates Windows software, and therefore
>have no choice but to use Windows (I've ordered OS/2 for my home
>machine, though).  Windows works GREAT if you want to switch between

You should convince your company that OS/2 is the ultimate development platform
for Windows, for the reasons you detailed in your excellent post!

John W. Linville



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  John W. Linville                Amateur radio:  KD4KHC                  |
|  #include "std_disclaimer.h"     E-mail:  linville@catt.ncsu.edu         |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: cap@mb5000.anes.upmc.edu (chris pilewski)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Fastdisk or 32 bit access in Win 3.1
Date: 16 Apr 92 14:00:00 GMT
Organization: UPMC

WHAT IS FASTDISK?
FASTDISK is not a 32bit disk cache.  It is not even a utility.
FASTDISK is a 32 bit disk accessing protocol.  It allows disk
access with 32bit device calls that bypass the computer's bios
and communicate directly with disk controller. This method is
MUCH faster.

WHAT IS FASTDISK FOR?
At the moment, FASTDISK is used only in 386 enhanced mode for
fast access of virtual memory (the swapfile).  FASTDISK will
not speed up any disk operations that don't use virtual memory.

HOW IS FASTDISK SELECTED?
FASTDISK (32 bit disk access) is selected in the 'Virtual Memory'
section of the '386 enhanced' portion of the Windows Control
Panel.

WHAT'S THE CATCH?
Simple.  Not all drive controllers are compatible with the
protocol.  The controller card must be compatible with the
'WD 1003' controller standard.  (WD stands for Western Digital.)

Almost all MFM and IDE controllers are compatible.  Many ESDI
controllers are not compatible.  And, almost none of the SCSI
controllers are compatible.

At the moment there is no fool proof test of WD1003 compatibility.
**To know for sure, you will just have to contact the maker of
your disk controller and ask.**  Windows performs a mini compatibility
test when '32 bit access' is selected.  But, this test is not fool
proof.

If you select '32 bit access' and; your controller card is incompatible,
your system may lock up and have to be cold booted.  But, this should
be the worst thing that can happen.  I don't think that it's possible to
damage the disk.

						- Chris Pilewski
						- pil@med.pitt.edu
From: thou@prism.poly.edu (Tsun-Jen Hou)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Help on terminal in Windows 3.1
Date: 10 Apr 92 19:33:03 GMT
Organization: Polytechnic University, New York

Help!!!
My terminal in Windows 3.1 is weird. Sometime I tried to open
a *.trm file and it just freezed the whole screen then I have to 
reset it. Even worst, even I do nothing by just open terminal
and close again, same thing happened again.
The terminal in Windows 3.0 work very well. I used the same *trm
file from windows 3.0.
By the way my computer is a 286 with 6mb of ram.
I tried with microsoft support and they can do nothing but tell
me to reinstall but it came out the same.
Any help will be appreciated!

						
-- 
*****************************************************************************
Tsun-Jen Hou					Polytechnic University
						Electrical Eng. Dept.
Life is short, play hard.
From: tanida@forseti.css.gov (Tom Tanida)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Why I'm sticking with Windows
Date: 16 Apr 92 23:40:15 GMT
Reply-To: tanida@esosun.css.gov (Tom Tanida)
In-reply-to: horan@ecs.umass.edu

In article <17514.29ed602a@ecs.umass.edu>, horan@ecs writes:
>
>By the way, am I misinformed or is NT looking at a $900 price tag?
>

Last I heard from MS, NT would be around $500.

I'm of the personal belief that systems software companies (like MS,
IBM, and Sun) ought to give away their OS's (at most charging just
for media+docs+shipping+tiny profit- say $5).  If the OS became widely accepted,
a company like MS could rake in the $$$ from the applications
available for the OS.  I still think an NT price of $500 is too high, and those
copies of MS Excel 4.0 for NT (and successive upgrades) may never be sold.

-Tom
tanida@esosun.css.gov
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: gregj@kong.eng.hou.compaq.com (Greg Judkins)
Subject: Re: Compaq AG1024
Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 17:16:01 GMT

In article <23188@life.ai.mit.edu> bkph@wheat-chex.ai.mit.edu (Berthold K.P. Horn) writes:
>
>Anyone know whether there are Windows 3.1 drivers yet for 
>the Compaq AG 1024 display board?
>

A Windows 3.1 display driver for the COMPAQ AG1024 board can be found on the 
Spectragraphics BBS.  It is in the DGIS section.  There are two files,
AG1024.EXE (~72K) and W31D300.EXE (~400K).  These are self extracting 
archives.  This software is a Beta release.

There is one known problem with this software.  If you run any full screen
DOS sessions, you must have a monitor attached to the VGA (or other primary
video adapter) or you will just get a blank screen.

The phone number for the BBS is:	(503) 646-1743

Enjoy,
Greg

Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: daw50509@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Don A. Walthers)
Subject: Re: VGA graphics in a windows in windows (how good is it???)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 04:45:09 GMT

kiraly@acsu.buffalo.edu (Gaspar Kiraly) writes:

>Can anyone tell me (who has windows 3.1) who much better is the 
>DOS graphics emulation in a Windows' window compared to 3.0?
>In 3.0 CGA emulation is uselessly slow... is 3.1 any better?

if you had any dos graphics in a window you were pretty lucky.
even though i'm finally able to get dos graphics in a 3.1 window
i wouldn't run out and buy it for that "feature". i was able to
get pcglobe (vga) in a window but uselessly slow is a major under-
statement. to move from one pull down menu to another took about 
a minute. although a dos text window is much faster, it is 
apparent that graphics are still meant for full screen.

don walthers  daw50509@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu

ps - if anyone has gotten  an ega or vga dosapp in a 3.1window
please let me know what? and how? -thanx

Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: jcwasik@pbhyf.PacBell.COM (Joe Wasik)
Subject: Maybe UAEs weren't so bad
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 22:39:39 GMT

I attended a Win 3.1/WfW 2.0/Excel 4.0 demo a few days ago by none other than
Microsoft themselves.  A great deal of pride was taken Win3.1's ability to
keep on going after what used to be a sudden death UAE error.  The demo
actually blew up Win3.1, then allowed an Alt+Ctl+Del reboot, and, yo, Windows
started up again -- without a real re-boot.  Of course the screen did hint
rather strongly to save your open files -- with new names no less.

But the demo person was brave and trodded along.  Soon afterwards, his WfW
became unstable.  It failed to obey mouse commands, and worse, when the
mouse cursor entered the menu bar, it changed into an insert cursor! Yikes.

All things considered, it was still pretty impressive.  It looked to me like
the WFW document could have been saved, and he really should have restarted
Windows. So, play it safe. Just because you can keep going after a corrupting
event doesn't mean you should.

Just thought y'ought to know...

-- 
Joe Wasik, Pac*Bell, 2600 Camino Ramon, Rm 4E750V, San Ramon, CA (510)823-2422
email: jcwasik@pbrain.PacBell.COM or [...]!pacbell!pbrain!jcwasik
"If riding on an airplane is flying, then riding on a boat is swimming"
	-- The Parachuters Handbook
From: kumarr@hparc0.aus.hp.com (Kumar Rangan)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 03:24:03 GMT
Subject: Re: Desktop Manager recommendations sought
Organization: the edge of the world : HP New Zealand
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms

>phil@inferno.peri.com (Philip Restuccia) /  1:24 am  Apr  8, 1992 /

>I am looking for opinions/recommendations/condemnations/etc on desktop managers
>for Win 3.1.  I am currently using NDW 1.0 (was using it with Win 3.0; haven't
>tried it yet with 3.1), but thought I would hold up on upgrading to NDW 2.0
>(does Symantec offer an upgrade option to registered users?).  I have played
>a bit with WinTools, and have looked over the description on the box of HP's
>NewWave 4.0; both of these look like they would give NDW a run for its money.
>
>So: anyone out there have anything good/bad to say about any of these desktop
>managers?  Which one should I plunk my money down for? NDW 2.0, WinTools, or
>HP NewWave 4.0?

I haven't used NDW, so cant offer comparisons. I *have* used NewWave for close
to 2 years now, and certainly like the features & benefits it offers. 

I'd suggest u read the April 92 issue of WINDOWS USER. It has some pretty good
articles both on NDW & NewWave, and offers comparisons between the 2 products.

|  Kumar Rangan                Internet   : kumarr@hparc0.aus.hp.com        |
|  PSO, HP Wellington          HP Desk    : Kumar Rangan/HP9781/01          |
|  New Zealand                 Tel# : +64 4 382 0400, Fax# : +64 4 384 3380 |
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: rvinluan@cs.cornell.edu (Rolando Vinluan)
Subject: Will this idea work? What about config options?
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 23:15:32 GMT

Article 766 of clari.nb.ibm:
From: newsbytes@clarinet.com
Newsgroups: clari.nb.ibm,clari.nb.top
Subject:  ****Seagate 1st Hard Disk Maker to Load DOS, Windows 04/08/92

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, U.S.A., 1992 APR 8 (NB) -- Seagate, a hard disk
manufacturer, says is has signed an agreement with Microsoft that will
allow it to provide "Instant On" for its hard disks by preloading MS-
DOS and Windows 3.1.

While original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), meaning those assembling
the computers, have these type of agreements with Microsoft, this is
the first time a hard disk manufacturer has made this agreement with
Microsoft or any operating system supplier.

Hard disks have to be formatted, then the operating system loaded and
configured -- tasks usually done by the store where the user purchases
the computer, by the user, and lately by some OEMs. The process is
time consuming and labor intensive, usually requiring the loading of
eight or more floppy disks, Seagate said. Recent attention over the
fallibility of the process if done by OEMs has made the headlines this
year when manufacturer Leading Edge and New Jersey-based mail-order
firm Computer Sales Professional discovered the Michelangelo virus had
been distributed on the hard disks of computers that had been prepared
in-house.

Computer virus expert Richard Levin told Newsbytes the hard disks of
the Leading Edge and Computer Sales Professional computers were
infected just as any other computer is infected, by the person who was
actually doing the manual labor involved in preparing the hard disk.
Levin said he predicted in his 1988 book "The Computer
Virus Handbook" that this would happen.

However, Seagate says it will now perform the formatting and
preparation of the disks for OEMs that are licensed by Microsoft to
distribute DOS and Windows on the hard disk of computer systems they
sell.

Seagate says eliminating a labor step for OEMs will help answer demand
from users who want more user-friendly systems. Al Shugart, Seagate's
president and chief executive officer, said in a prepared statement:
"We are very pleased to be the first out of the gate with 'Instant on'
capabilities and consider this kind of upstream integration to be the
wave of the future. Microsoft's new Windows 3.1 installation features
and Seagate's ability to deliver preloaded software in volume make a
powerful partnership capable of answering end-user demands for a more
user-friendly computer system."

Seagate says it expects to begin volume production of the hard disk
drives with the "Instant On" capability in June of this year.

(Linda Rohrbough/19920407/Press Contact: Julie Still, Seagate, tel
408-439-2276, fax 408-438-4127; Rich Levin, Levin & Associates, 215-
333-8274)
From: gac2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Geoffrey A. Coulter)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Smartdrv (Was: Re: Win 3.1 and Cache Programs)
Date: 12 Apr 92 05:59:20 GMT
Reply-To: gac2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <1992Apr10.213834.19548@acs.ucalgary.ca> bauwens@acs.ucalgary.ca (Luc Bauwens) writes:
>In article <54133@hydra.gatech.EDU> vapspgd@prism.gatech.EDU (Edward Hefter) writes:
>>In article <1992Apr9.200231.23442@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> jdr8@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Jay D Rosenbaum) writes:
>>>Is it necessary to use the new Smartdrive with Win 3.1, or will other, and
>>>perhaps old versions, of other Cache programs work?                        
>>>-Jay
>>>jdr8@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
>>
>>   While we're asking, what about hyderdisk?
>
> 
>But why would one want to do that?  Smartdrv is much faster than any
>other present alternatives, partly because of the write cache.

But is it faster?  Simply having a write cache does not mean it is
faster than Hyperdisk or Norton Cache, for example, both of which
also cache writes.  Does anyone have any figures on its performance,
or applied any benchmarks?

>(But it may not work well with third party EMM's).
>
>I have been running it for about four months and it has behaved flawlessly.
>
>BTW, IT LOADS HIGH ON ITS OWN whenever possible.  (See the flags
>by typing "SMARTDRV ?")

So will a handful of other caches.

>Also, it goes in the AUTOEXEC.BAT, not in the CONFIG.SYS (Except for
>those machines that need double-buffering, in which case it goes
>in both, with appropriate flags).
>
>Luc

And another question: how well does it interact with SCSI harddisks?
With SCSI busmastering host adapters?

Thanks.

Geoffrey Coulter
g-coulter@uchicago.edu
gac2@midway.uchicago.edu
From: biow@cs.umd.edu (Christopher Biow)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 Bugs - Threat or Menace?
Keywords: windows 3.1 bug
Date: 8 Apr 92 22:07:10 GMT
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742

To the list, add an hourglass and a hung system when you click on 
"receive log" in WinFax Pro. CTRL-ALT-DEL gives you the option of
either really rebooting, or returning to the hung system.

Also, one hang of the program manager for no apparent reason. CTRL-
ALT-DEL allows you to close program manager, leaving the windows 
desktop, no mouse cursor, and no way to do anything but reboot.

W4W 2.0 mysteriously converts all "Inserted" symbols to the wrong
symbol font throughout a document.

And yes, SuperPrint won't work. Since I have a Panasonic KPX-4450
(LJ Plus clone), I am anxiously waiting for the 2.1 version of
SuperPrint. Zenographics started taking orders on April Fools Day
for 2.1 upgrades. Truly an auspicious day for that sort of thing.
From: failsafe@cellar.org (Failsafe)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: QEMM 6, windows and DOS box
Date: 16 Apr 92 00:08:57 GMT
Organization: The Cellar BBS and public access system

iam@stiatl.salestech.com (Ian Mercado) writes:

> amemjm@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
> 
> >Hi all,
> >	I've just instyalled QEMM-386 version 6.02, and have an odd problem with
> >windows. 
> 
> 
> >DEVICE=C:\QEMM386.SYS ST:M
> 
> >I suspect the stealth parameter is th problem, prob it's mapping a system RO
> >that is needed, but any ideas which one??
> 
> Aha!  I see that I am not the only one to experience problems with Stealth
> and Windows 3.1.  In fact, I cannot even get 3.1 to come up at all when I
> am running with Stealth in effect.
> 
> Question:  Has ANYONE out there in netland gotten 3.1 to work with Stealth...
> RELIABLY, that is.  I am having the worst time getting 3.1 to be stable
> on my 486/33 EISA.  Blecch!

I guess I must be blessed but I've had no problems upgrading to 3.1 over 3.0
with my same autoexec and config using stealth and QEMM 6.02. The parameters
I use are as follows:

DEVICE=C:\QEMM\QEMM386.SYS R:3 RAM ADAPTERROM C800-CBFF, EXCLUDE C000-C7FF
ST:M DB=2

I loadedhigh smartdrive, setver, ramdrive, share and the new MS mouse driver
and am using the ASPI4DOS SCSI manager. So far no conflicts!


Steve Roth
Philadelphia, PA.

------
failsafe@cellar.org (Failsafe)
The Cellar BBS - (215) 654-9184
From: wbh@druwy.att.com (Bill Hyde)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Boo Hiss MicroSoft
Date: 9 Apr 92 20:12:38 GMT
Reply-To: wbh@druwy.att.com
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Denver
In-reply-to: swyatt@bach.udel.edu's message of 8 Apr 92 17:57:03 GMT

In article <18790@bach.udel.edu> swyatt@bach.udel.edu (Stephen L Wyatt) writes:
   I have a question- why is some people bitching about acouple of
   hours or days when you've been waiting acouple of YEARS?  Jeesh,
   hold your pants on... Like a few days really makes a difference.
   If you run your life around the windows 3.1 product, you've got a
   real problem.

An interesting question.  I seem to remember reading a study about
what satisfied and dissatisfied computer users.  Turns out that people
didn't mind waiting as long as you could deliver what you said you
would when you said you could -- predictability was more important
than rapidity.  I got my home copy of 3.1 yesterday -- a day or two
behind what I had been promised -- no big deal since I won't get time
to install it until tonight at the earliest.  My work copy still
hasn't showed up (but that could be our internal mail folks too).

--
-- Bill Hyde             | wbh@druwy.ATT.COM or att!druwy!wbh
-- AT&T Bell Labs Denver | (303) 538-4326
-- If it's not fun and it's not important then why am I doing it?
From: horan@ecs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: OS/2 and svga
Date: 17 Apr 92 11:10:40 GMT
Article-I.D.: ecs.17544.29eeb230

In article <1992Apr17.062521.26608@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, daw50509@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Don A. Walthers) writes:
> admiral.uucp!fsaleem@uunet.uu.net (Farzan Saleem) writes:
> 
>>I hope that this hasn't been discussed already, since I haven't been
>>on for a while... 
>> 
>>I currently run Win 3.1 in 1024x768x256 on my computer (386/33 Cache
>>4 megs ram, 120 mb hd). I am thinking of switching over to OS/2 ver 2
>>except that I was told that it was only able to run in 640x480x16, 
>>which now looks terrible since I got used to 1024x768. 
>> 
>>Is there any truth in this, or will os/2 handle 1024x768? How about
>>800x600?  Again, I apologize if this has been discussed before.
>>
> i don't mean to be rude(NOT!) but if your going to switch to os/2 switch
> to an os/2 news group also. this will benefit us windows users by cutting
> down on the ever increasing junk here and you would most likely get a
> more accurate and unbiased response to your question. btw- i installed
> mps's stealth fighter on an os/2 machine and it sucked!!! why would an
> os/2 machine with 640*480 resolution reduce a vga doss app to a window 
> about the size of a windows3.1 clock. also, the screen refresh rate would
> make that program look slow to a c-64 user(not extinct yet, are they?).
> - and want to know about svga? if you don't plan on running dos apps and 

I'd much prefer the zippy speed of running flight simulators in a window
in Windows.  It's like really being there!  I could f*cking draw the screens
faster than dos stuff runs in a Windows window.

easy champ.
5000
Gregg Horan
"He sleeps, he steals and he is rude to the customers, but there is the 
best convenience store worker I ever saw."


> just want to waste your money then forget what i just said, but still 
> switch to nn group where you might be wanted.
> no hard feelings?
> 
> 
> -- 
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> |Don Walthers : daw50509@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu : University of Illinois at U-C |
> | -Where alcohol and academics go hand-in-hand, so they say.              |
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-oohh!  I'm  impressed.
From: fahole@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: W4W 2.0 & Excel Printing Problems
Date: 13 Apr 92 14:32:22 MDT
Distribution: na
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1992Apr13.160811.28033@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>, drv@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dennis.r.vogel) writes:
> In article <shenoy.703116642@pv0213.vincent.iastate.edu>, shenoy@iastate.edu (Shiva Shenoy) writes:
>> 
>> If you don't have Excel 3.0a, you should call MS and get the free upgrade
>> from 3.0. It will solve all your printing problems.
>> 
> Thanks for the suggestion but I fail to see how upgrading
> Excel will solve Word for Windows problems.  Please elaborate.

It's obviously a holistic approach :->
(Or, they meant WFW 2.0a, which also solves some printing problems)

-- 
David Hole                  FAHOLE@USU
Utah State University       FAHOLE@CC.USU.EDU
Logan, UT                   Just say snow!
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms