HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kemp@convex.com (Phil Kemp)
Subject: Can't find file error with djgpp 1.08
Summary: latest djgpp is not working correctly
Keywords: djgpp gcc 2.2.2 dos
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 21:22:21 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

I downloaded the latest djgpp and the dv/x libs and tried to compile
the sample program compress.

With a command line of

gcc -c compress.c

I get the following error.

d:/gnu/bin/gcc.exe version 1.07 Copyright (C) 1991 DJ Delorie
Can't open file <-c>

with gcc compress.c as the command I get this.

d:/gnu/bin/gcc.exe version 1.07 Copyright (C) 1991 DJ Delorie
Unknown file type 0x2a2f (025057)

Note the version number. I am using the same environment vars as the
last djgpp version and cross checked them against the docs. They seem
fine.

Does anyone know what I am doing wrong?
Thanks
PK
--
Phil Kemp, Systems Engineer         Voice:(403)-233-2815
CONVEX Computer Canada Ltd.           Fax:(403)-261-2029
Calgary, Alta.                  Internet:kemp@convex.com
From: tim@nijinsky.ipac.caltech.edu (Tim Conrow)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Producing position independant code ...
Date: 31 Aug 92 20:09:42 GMT
Distribution: gnu
Organization: California Institute of Technology

A question for a friend:

Can one create position independant code with gcc version 1.39?
If so, how? If not, will the newer, beta release (2.2.2?) do the
job?

Specifically, what we need to do is create a runtime loadable library
in SUN OS. With the SUN C compiler it would be done like this:

cc -O2 -pic (SOURCE MODULES)
ld -o libxxx.so.1.0 -assert pure-text (OBJECT MODULES)

How can we perform the first step with gcc in such a way that the 2nd
step works correctly? When we try it with gcc now, we get errors.

Please reply to nick@ipac.caltech.edu

Thanks for any help.

-- Tim
From: jclark@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (John Clark)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: GCC for OS9
Date: 4 Sep 92 16:53:41 GMT
Distribution: gnu
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <9209031208.AA20165@life.ai.mit.edu> MEHRDAD@glum.DEv.cf.ac.UK (GHASSEMPOORY) writes:
+Is there a GCC for OS/9 operating system ?
+If yes where can I find it?

There is a gcc-1.40 (or so) tailored to OS9 available on
'cabrales.cs.wisc.edu'. I have some acquaintances who have been
using it with great success.
-- 

John Clark
jclark@ucsd.edu
Xref: sparky gnu.gcc.help:2003 gnu.emacs.help:3873
From: mikef@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Mike Fourman)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,gnu.emacs.help
Subject: gnu emacs mode for ansi
Date: 28 Aug 92 15:46:17 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh

I find that mark-c-function doesn't always.

Does anyone have lisp code for electric ansi (gc)C  ?

-- 
Prof. Michael P. Fourman                     email        mikef@dcs.ed.ac.uk
Dept. of Computer Science                    'PHONE (+44) (0)31-650 5198 (sec)
JCMB, King's Buildings, Mayfield Road,              (+44) (0)31-650 5197
Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, Scotland, UK                 FAX (+44) (0)31 667 7209
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: jaideep@makalu.UUCP (Jaideep Mirchandani)
Subject: Questions
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 14:32:51 GMT


1.     Does gcc generate alignment bytes, e.g. force longs to exist at
    word boundaries, etc. ?

Can this be customized so that I can prevent this from happening ?> 

2. Also, what is the format of the .o files generated
by the gnu linker - is it COFF/XCOFF, etc. ? 

Thanks,
Jaideep
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: casper@fwi.uva.nl (Casper H.S. Dik)
Subject: Re: gcc2.2.2 and X11R5
Organization: FWI, University of Amsterdam
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 22:11:46 GMT

brendan@cygnus.com (Brendan Kehoe) writes:

>In article <1992Aug20.165136.2723@ennews.eas.asu.edu> scowen@wfpc3.la.asu.edu (Paul A. Scowen) writes:

>   My recommendation to all people out there attempting this is DON'T USE GCC
>   vers 2.2.2 TO BUILD X!!!  It does not appear to have what it takes.

>I built it with gcc2, and it works wonderfully.  X11R5 patched to 16
>(I think it was), and the patches in README.X11 applied from the gcc
>2.2.2 distribution.  No other changes.  I suggest you start from
>scratch, since you obviously configured something wrong.

>I strongly recommend you *do* use it; the performance improvements are
>noticeable, in addition to the size reduction (as compared to gcc1).

Gcc 1.x generated extremely poor code for SPARC machines. It didn't
even come close to Sun's bundled C compiler (30%-100% slower, in
my experience). The other reason not to use GCC 1.x for SPARC
based machines was the fact that gcc 1.x wasn't fully call
compatible.

In gcc 2.x most of this has changed. The code generated is now
about the same speed to somewhat faster than the code generated by
Sun's bundled compielrs. However, one point of concern remains.
Gcc generates lots of calls to functions from libgcc.a for
certain primitives. This means that you cannot have users
choose between compilers when compiling X programs, but force
them to use gcc or go to some extra length to include libgcc.a on the
final link command line.

The default gcc setup for X will compile the libraries with
Sun's cc, the special setup for Gcc2 will compile the libraries
gcc, as it now understands -fpic. I would recommend against that,
for the above mentioned reasons. Most of the performance
benefits can be had from speeding up the server, in my opinion.

Casper

-- 
						|	Casper H.S. Dik
						|	casper@fwi.uva.nl
From: brendan@cygnus.com (Brendan Kehoe)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: gcc2.2.2 and X11R5
Date: 29 Aug 92 18:41:48 GMT
	<1992Aug20.163706.1779@ennews.eas.asu.edu>
	<1992Aug20.165136.2723@ennews.eas.asu.edu>
Reply-To: brendan@cygnus.com
Organization: Cygnus Support, Palo Alto, CA
In-reply-to: scowen@wfpc3.la.asu.edu's message of 20 Aug 92 16:51:36 GMT

In article <1992Aug20.165136.2723@ennews.eas.asu.edu> scowen@wfpc3.la.asu.edu (Paul A. Scowen) writes:

   My recommendation to all people out there attempting this is DON'T USE GCC
   vers 2.2.2 TO BUILD X!!!  It does not appear to have what it takes.

I built it with gcc2, and it works wonderfully.  X11R5 patched to 16
(I think it was), and the patches in README.X11 applied from the gcc
2.2.2 distribution.  No other changes.  I suggest you start from
scratch, since you obviously configured something wrong.

I strongly recommend you *do* use it; the performance improvements are
noticeable, in addition to the size reduction (as compared to gcc1).

--
Brendan Kehoe                                               brendan@cygnus.com
Cygnus Support, Palo Alto, CA                                  +1 415 322 3811
                       Oooh! A handsome stranger! And me, without my shoes on.
                                     --The Princess, The Emperor's New Clothes
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: matthias@asl.uni-bielefeld.de (Matthias Ehrhard)
Subject: fixincludes
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 17:56:13 GMT
Organization: Universitaet Bielefeld, ASL.

Hi,
I tried to install gcc 2.2.2. on a sparc station but I have got
the feeling that the installation fell.
I made 'make install-fixincludes' a couple times but it did not find
a few directories and fixed the same files again. 

The next thing I do not understand is that the include directory under lib
empty is. is this correct?

I hope that someone can give me an answer to these - probably simple - questions


Matthias
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: pearson@chemistry.ucsc.EDU (Tony Pearson)
Subject: Information about GCC
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 21:11:06 GMT

Anthony Pearson
Systematic Solutions
141 Halton Ln.
Watsonville, CA 95076

Dear GCC Help-Group : We are a small start-up company interested
		      in distributing GCC with our hardware product.
		      We are in the design stages of producing a PC
		      add-in board EISA/ISA bus compatible, utilizing
		      an R4000 CPU. We are also contemplating an i860
		      product at a later date.	There are some general 
		      questions, we have about GCC involving its 
		      performance, and preprocessor ability with 
		      respect to the R400, as well as to the i860. The 
		      questions we have are:


			1)  The GCC info docs imply that GCC can
			    be configured for the R4000. What kind
			    of bugs can we expect and is the 
			    configuration really optimized so as
			    to be competitive with commercially
			    available compilers such as that from
			    Greenhills, Microway, or Laheigh etc.

			    Which architecture (i860 or R4000) is the 
			    GCC compiler best suited for? 
					
			2)  Does the GCC preprocessor provide 
			    optimization support for the R4000,
			    or i860. Specifically : vectorization,
			    loop-unrolling. Does it produce code that
			    runs in an efficient pipe-lined manner? 

			3)  Can we obtain LINPAC ratings for the
			    routines SSDOT, DDOT running on the i860
			    and the R4000. If not the R4000,
			    then the R3000. Can we get these
			    ratings with and without optimization.

			4)  Does the Open Software Foundation provide
			    a Fortran compiler.

			5)  Will GCC be available for a Windows-NT
			    environment in the near future. If not
			    what will be the magnitude of a project
			    to adapt it to Windows NT.


		I appreciate any help and information that you can
provide us in these areas.  If our product comes to fruition, we would
very much like to make an arrangement with your organization to 
distribute the GCC compiler with our product. I can also be reached
at the following E-Mail addresses.*


				Sincerely,

				Anthony Pearson

*  U6534@y1.sdsc.edu
   U27150@uy.ncsa.uiuc.edu

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: rjesse@netcom.Netcom.COM (Rick Jesse)
Subject: gcc.2.2.2 (c++) and private static vars
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 07:00:05 GMT
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Service
Distribution: gnu.gcc.help


I'm compiling InterViews 2.6 with gcc2.2.2 using sun's
assembler on a Sun4/110 with SunOS4.1.1.

I have no problems with the compiliation until the link stage.  The
InterViews libraries compile and archive successfully, but when I
compile application code and try to link with these libraries I get
undefined symbols.  After looking around at the object files and the
source, I found that the symbols that are reported as undefined are
each delcared as private or protected static variables of classes in
the libraries.


The output from the link looks like:

ld: Undefined symbol
   __8WorldRep$_host
   __6Sensor$maxchannel
   __6Sensor$channels


The delcarations in the source look like:

class Sensor : public Resource {
public:
//...
protected:
    static unsigned channels;
    static int maxchannel;
//...
};


and...


class WorldRep {
public:
//...
private:
    static char _host[100];
//...
};


Are there options that I should be specifying to gcc to
correct this?

Thanks,


Rick Jesse
From: gordonm@rendyn1.uucp (Gordon Marler ext. 4609)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Building gcc on SCO 3.2v4
Keywords: Posix Source weird defines
Date: 26 Aug 92 23:17:10 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Reynadyne Data Systems


	I've been trying to build gcc v2.2.2 on SCO 3.2v4 (WITH a development
system).  Here are the steps I take, and the problem that occurs:

1. configure --target=i386-*-sco3.2v4
	Everything links up well here, except that it seems that tm.h is
	symbolically linked to config/i386sco.h instead of config/i386sco4.h

2. make LANGUAGES=c
	Everything compiles well.

3. make stage1
	The move occurs properly with a few ignored errors about being unable to
	access the protoize and unprotoize files, among others.

4. make CC="stage1/gcc -Bstage1/" CFLAGS="-g -O" LANGUAGES=c
	Everything works well until the compilation of cccp.c.  When the
	link runs, the definition of fileno is not found (not surprising, since
	it is a macro).  It seems that this is caused by a failure to define
	_POSIX_SOURCE.

	Now I tried to link tm.h to config/i386sco4.h, which seems to define
the _POSIX_SOURCE constant, but the same error occurs.  What have I done
incorrectly?


E-mail can be sent to marler@proteus.lonestar.org in preference to the
addresses given in the signature.



-- 
T. Gordon Marler		| Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there's
Reynadyne Data Systems		| injustice, and somewhere else the tea is
(817) 652-4693  		| getting cold! -- Dr. Who
...!digi!reynard!gordonm OR  marler@bme.uta.edu
From: jclark@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (John Clark)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: installing gcc
Date: 4 Sep 92 16:50:12 GMT
Distribution: gnu
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <MSANGHVI.92Sep2132802@sol.ulowell.edu> msanghvi@cs.ulowell.edu writes:
+hello folks!
+   i plan on installing gcc 2.2.2 on a sparcstation and what i wanted to know
+is if glibc 1.03 (that was the latest version i found on prep.ai.mit.edu) is
+also required? i would appreciate it if you could email to me the reply as i

glibc-1.03 is not necessary for gcc use, and the current available
version is now glibc-1.04, on prep.ai.mit.edu.
-- 

John Clark
jclark@ucsd.edu
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: pierre@la.tce.COM (Pierre Willard)
Subject: Re: Re: How much is gcc used ?
Reply-To: pierre@la.tce.com
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 18:56:30 GMT

> In article <9208281718.AA18443@_la.tce.com>, pierre@la.tce.COM (Pierre Willard) writes:
> > > I am trying to convince my boss to switch to gcc. He says that he will only
> > > do so if :
> > > 1. gcc has been used in a real product.
> > > 2. It has been used with networking software, tcpip, Sun rpc, etc.
> > > 3. It works on (yuck)PC's, esp. OS/2 and Windows.
> > 
> > DESQview/X X11 toolkit includes GNU C Compiler !!
> > (with DOS4GX Dos Extender).
> 
> I suggest you check your information on this one:
> 
> 1. the X11 toolkit includes the GNU C compiler, correct, but as of yet
> not-quite-officially announced.
> 
> 2. It uses go32, not dos4gx.  Dos4gx is used for their 32-bit
> programs, but not for gcc-built programs.
> 
> 3. The gcc it includes is a verbatim copy of djgpp 1.08 (or will be).
> 
> 4. djgpp 1.08 also includes (binary-only) the X11 toolkit, per
> agreement with Quarterdeck.
> 
> This arrangement between Quarterdeck and myself (author of djgpp and
> porter of gcc to it) was to our mutual benefit, and is definitely a
> pair of real products.  Traditionally, support for this particular
> environment (djgpp) has been at *no* cost to any user.
> 
> Note also that I get a lot of mail from people who are using gcc
> ported to MS-DOS to create real products (ie: sell for $$ to
> customers) as well.

Thanks for the info.

To explain my previous posting, let me just quote what the 'Xploding
the horizons of Dos' document from Quarterdeck for the developer
conference (which was in August) :

"... a complimentary DESQview/X11 toolkit is available to attendees of
all five days of the conference - complete with GNU C compiler, O'Reilly
reference and programming guides, Rational Systems'DOS/4GX DOS
extender tools and Instant-C development environment. (a $750 value)."

Bye
Pierre Willard (pierre@la.tce.com)

PS : do you expect a DPMI version of your go32 library ?

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: chatfiel@anaconda.cis.ohio-state.edu (William Lewis Chatfield)
Subject: gcc 386BSD 4.4 net2 instalation problem
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 13:40:39 GMT

I am trying to build gcc 2.2.2 on at 386BSD 4.4 net2 system.  I am getting an 
error at the point where it tries to compile the first part of libgcc2.a,
which is _muldi3.  I have included the error messages and some preceding make
output.  I am hoping that someone else has encountered this problem before and
can tell me how to solve it.  I would appreciate any help.  If you can direct
me to someone who might know the answer, that would be great.

BEGIN MAKE OUTPUT:
_adddf3
_subdf3
_fixdfsi
_fixsfsi
_floatsidf
_floatsisf
_truncdfsf2
_extendsfdf2
_addsf3
_negsf2
_subsf3
_mulsf3
_divsf3
_eqdf2
_nedf2
_gtdf2
_gedf2
_ltdf2
_ledf2
_eqsf2
_nesf2
_gtsf2
_gesf2
_ltsf2
_lesf2
for file in .. ;  do  if [ x${file} != x.. ]; then  name=`echo ${file} | sed -e 's/[.]c$//' -e 's/[.]asm$//'`;  echo ${name};  if [ ${name}.asm = ${file} ]; then  cp ${file} ${name}.s; file=${name}.s;  if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then true; else exit 1; fi;  else true; fi;  cc -O -I. -I. -I./config -c ${file};  if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then true; else exit 1; fi;  ar qc tmplibgcc1.a ${name}.o;  if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then true; else exit 1; fi;  rm -f ${name}.[so];  else true;  fi;  done
mv tmplibgcc1.a libgcc1.a
rm -f tmplibgcc2.a
set -e;  for name in _muldi3 _divdi3 _moddi3 _udivdi3 _umoddi3 _negdi2  _lshrdi3 _lshldi3 _ashldi3 _ashrdi3   _udivmoddi4 _cmpdi2 _ucmpdi2 _floatdidf _floatdisf  _fixunsdfsi _fixunssfsi _fixunsdfdi _fixdfdi _fixunssfdi _fixsfdi  _varargs _eprintf _builtin_new _builtin_New _builtin_del  _bb _shtab _clear_cache _trampoline __main _exit;  do  echo ${name};  ./gcc -O2    -g -B./ -g1 -I. -I. -I./config -c -DL${name}  ./libgcc2.c -o ${name}.o;  if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then true; else exit 1; fi;  ar rc tmplibgcc2.a ${


name}.o;  rm -f ${name}.o;  done
_muldi3
libgcc2.c:41:Junk character 47.
libgcc2.c:41:Rest of line ignored. 1st junk character valued 65 (A).
libgcc2.c:43:Junk character 47.
libgcc2.c:43:Rest of line ignored. 1st junk character valued 78 (N).
*** Error code 1

Stop.
END OF OUTPUT


Please send responses to bchatfield@csi.compuserve.com or just reply to this
posting (chatfiel@cis.ohio-state.edu).


Thanks,
Bill Chatfield


Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: knipe@mksol.dseg.ti.com (richard l knipe)
Subject: gdb & djgpp ??
Organization: Texas Instruments
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 22:45:32 GMT

Is it possible to build gdb 4.6 with djgpp 1.08?  Before
I try this, I would like any info/warnings/experience from
all the netlanders.

DJGPP is a great dos port of GCC but like the readme file
states:  debug32 is not for the weak of heart.

Richard Knipe
knipe@me.uta.edu
knipe@mksol.dseg.ti.com
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: msanghvi@sol.ulowell.edu (Mehul Sanghvi)
Subject: installing gcc
Reply-To: msanghvi@cs.ulowell.edu
Organization: UMass-Lowell Comp. Sci. Dept.
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 18:28:02 GMT



hello folks!
   i plan on installing gcc 2.2.2 on a sparcstation and what i wanted to know
is if glibc 1.03 (that was the latest version i found on prep.ai.mit.edu) is
also required? i would appreciate it if you could email to me the reply as i
dont read this group.

thanks in advance.

peace

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mehul "raja lakhan" Sanghvi            |  UMass-Lowell, Comp. Sci. Dept.
UUCP: ...!harvard!ulowell!msanghvi     |  SnailNET: 754 Aiken St. #11, 
INTERNET: msanghvi@cs.ulowell.edu      |            Lowell, MA. 01850-1804
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AI hackers do it with robots.
From: serenang@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Serena Ng)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: Problems with #include <unistd.h>
Date: 31 Aug 92 15:30:30 GMT
Organization: Princeton University
Originator: news@nimaster

I downloaded EMX-0.8d from Hobbes and installed the GCC compiler under OS2.
I have a 486/33 with 12 megs of RAM installed. GCC works fine and created
the executable PROG.EXE. However, I need to read in a huge data set 10000 by
20, so I tried to use EMXBIND to combine PROG with EMX.exe.  I tried the
BIND.CMD that comes with EMX-0.8d and came back with an error "cannot open
PROG.EXE". I tried to use EMXBIND manually, got the same message. "PROG.EXE"
was in the default directory where I executed BIND and EMXBIND though. 

This is the first time I use GCC. Are there compiling options I should have
used before I run BIND? The path to all the emx executables seem fine since
the BIND program did not complain about locating EMXL.exe or EMX.exe. Any
tips and advice on this problem would be appreciated.
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: michael@resonex.com (Michael Bryan)
Subject: Re: How to compile/install libg++2.2.2
Organization: Resonex Inc., Sunnyvale CA
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 22:09:51 GMT

In article <1992Sep2.175950.23879@puffin.uucp> pete@puffin.uucp (Pete Carah) writes:
>In article <1992Aug31.192328.19979@cc.umontreal.ca> duperval@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Duperval Laurent) writes:
>>Is there a way to tell configure where to find gcc?  As in 
>>rootme=`dirname `which gcc`` (I know it's illegal but...)
>>or something similar?
>I just editted the makefiles after configure.

Try "make CC=gcc" (or whatever it takes to find your gcc).  I did this
today after running into exactly the problems you mention, only on a
HP 9000/380 running HP-UX.  With the "CC=" addition, everything compiled
just fine.  I still haven't installed it yet, though, so I don't know
for *sure* that it worked ok.  Hopefully I'll get a chance to finish
the job in the next day or so!

-- 
Michael Bryan        michael@resonex.com                     |     ,_,
Milk and Cheese in '92!!!                                    |    /oo \
"What the world needs now are some true words of wisdom,     |    <>__|
like 'La-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la'."  -- Cracker           |    |  U|
From: sayer@ctp.com (Stephen Ayers)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: GCC 2.2.2 support for templates
Date: 2 Sep 92 20:37:09 GMT
Organization: Cambridge Technology Partners

Can someone update me on the state of template support in GCC 2.2.2?
I'm trying to compile the Booch components which make heavy use of templates.
It groks on lines that are excepted by other 3.0 C++ compilers.

Thanks,

-- 
Stephen Ayers
Cambridge Technology Partners
sayer@ctp.com
+1 617-374-8202
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: dan@gordian.com (Dan Lambright)
Subject: defining endianness on mips processor
Organization: Gordian; Costa Mesa, CA
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 08:30:45 GMT


On the c compiler provided with the RISC os for their mips
processor, there is an option to toggle between big and
little endian.  cc (-EL/EB)  On our workstations we compile
in big endian, and for our engineering platform we compile
in little endian.

gcc does not apear to have such an option of its command line.
There are #defines that you can use,  it seems, to say which 
type of endianness you want, when you build gcc.

I realy don't want to have two gcc executables (one for big and
one for little endian.)  I'd like a command line argument
to be able to switch between the two.  Is that going to exist
in a future gcc release, or is it posible to hack on the code
to produce big/little endian as definable by the user?

Dan Lambright
dan@gordian.com

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: rob@dinner.asrc.albany.edu (Robert D. Seals)
Subject: Howcum -Wall doesn't include -Wformat on Sparc?
Organization: SUNYA - ASRC, Albany, NY
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 92 12:20:26 GMT


Hello,
I just brought up 2.2.2 on our Sparcstation 2, and noticed that
#include <stdio.h> still doesn't know what 'printf' is, even
though I ran fixincludes. So I looked in gcc.info-5, and saw
that format checking is enabled by -Wformat. It's true, the
format was checked, and no complaints. But on my RS/6000,
-Wall includes -Wformat. Why isn't this so on the Sparc? And how
can I add it in? And how do I get the declarations of printf/scanf
known to the compiler?

Thank you,
rob
-- 
------
Crazy, man.
rob@dinner.asrc.albany.edu
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: bjaspan@athena.mit.edu (Barr3y Jaspan)
Subject: Re: GCC on OS/2 ?
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 19:51:44 GMT

In article <bfppb1gy@csv.warwick.ac.uk>, cudcv@warwick.ac.uk (Rob McMahon) writes:
|> Sorry for the dumb question, I'm sure this has been answered before, but is
|> there a port of GCC for OS/2 ?

Yes.  In fact, there are two. :-)  See the OS/2 Programmer's FAQ, available in
news.answers or via anonymous ftp from pit-manager.mit.edu.

-- 
Barr3y Jaspan, bjaspan@mit.edu