HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: boklan@athena.cas.vanderbilt.edu (Kent D. Boklan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: GL: O Sonni! my Sonni!
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:18:02 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Nov18.161802.7163
Organization: Vanderbilt University Mathematics Department


  O Sonni! my Sonni! another year is done;
  My soul has weather'd every rack, my heart is overcome;
  The end is near, the bells I hear, the people all exulting,
  While follow eyes the steady keel, the Guiding Light grim and daring:

    But O heart! heart! heart!
     O the bleeding drops of red,
      Where on the floor my Sonni lies,
       Fallen cold and dead.


  O Sonni! my Sonni! rise up and hear the bells;
  Rise up - for you the flag is flung - for you the bugle trills;
  For you bouquets and ribbon'd wreaths - for you the rooms a-crowdin;
  For you they call, the swaying mass, their eager faces turning;

    Here Sonni! dear Sonni!
     This arm beneath your head;
      It is some dream that on the floor
       You've fallen cold and dead.


  My Sonni does not answer, her lips are pale and still;
  My Sonni does not feel my arm, she has no pulse or will;
  The show is finish'd, for once and all, its term is closed and done;
  From fearful trip the empty ship comes in with object won:

    Exult, O shores, and ring, O bells!
     But I with mournful tread,
      Walk the floor my Sonni lies,
       Fallen cold and dead.
From: slowther@ducvax.auburn.edu (Sam Lowther)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: Anyone know the date Carolyn/murdered?
Summary: Apr 15 - tax day, Caroleg's murder, AND ...
Date: 19 Nov 92 12:44:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Auburn University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Nov18.214724.22409@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>, roxy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (r.prisco) writes...

>> It was Tax Day, April 15, 1991.  This is how one of the witnesses is the
>> case, I no longer remember whom, was able to be sure of the date in question.

>And it's also ...............
> 
>THE JEEPSTER'S BIRTHDAY!!!!
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> 
>RiBabe

Jeepo was born in 1991?  Must have been one of those soap opera kids.

--Sam

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sam Lowther       |INTERNET:slowther@ducvax.auburn.edu |"I'm not a doctor, but  
Auburn University |BITNET:  slowther@auducvax          | I play one on r.a.t.s."
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: dias@cac.washington.edu (Vivian Dias )
Subject: Friday Updates
Organization: UW Computing
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:44:18 GMT

  This is your overdue-for-a-vacation-Friday-updater.  I will be gone for
  the next three Fridays and am wondering if there is any kind soul out
  there who would like to fill in until I return???  You may not even
  have to do one on 11/27 aren't there always marathon football games 
  on?  Anyway, let me know.  Thanks.

  -Vivian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vivian Dias         University of Washington        dias@u.washington.edu
    "The problem is not whether machines think, but whether men do."
                                                       B.F. Skinner
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: robson@braindamaged.cis.udel.edu (Janice Robson)
Subject: Re: ATWT: meg/iva/error/lily
Organization: University of Delaware, Newark
Distribution: na 
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:02:08 GMT

In article <199211171528.AA67396@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU> Lois Therese Casaleggi <ltc2f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU> writes:
>i have some comments and a question thats been bothering me for a
>long time...

>first off, i just saw friday's show and didn't get to tape
>monday's so i don't know what's happened in the meantime, but i
>just have to say that meg is out of control! asking iva for her
>baby because she and john aren't together and she has aaron?!?

DITTO!  I couldn't believe this scene.  I guess we are supposed
to realize just how desperate Meg is for a child - this would
certainly explain the distance growing between Meg and Josh.
She is so bent on having a child, she has obviously allowed this
to affect her relationship with her husband. 

>my second comment has confused me for a while.  i may just be
>being dense but i never saw what the HUGE deal was about keeping
>the truth from lily.  i have no doubt that news like that would

I have been saying this too for quite some time now - tell the
fragile princess already!  She is a grown woman!  Now, after all
of this time has passed and no one has told her the truth, she has
every right to get pissed at everybody who kept this ridiculous
secret from her - including the almighty Enema who wimped out and
elected NOT to tell the princess.     
 
I missed yesterday's episode too - I can't wait for the update.
Can anyone supply a quicky update? 


Thanks,
Studmuffette ;)
From: slaury@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Susan Laury)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GH: Tiff playing with a full deck?
Date: 16 Nov 92 17:59:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: usenet.BxtLz9.KD9
Organization: Indiana University

In article <1992Nov15.191847.18294@spectrum.xerox.com> chris@eso.mc.xerox.com writes:
>Anyone else think Tiffany is going to be GH's new token loony?  With Dr
>Stalker appparently dead, Nikki out of a contract (and she hadn't
>acted particularly loopy since the end of the trial and the arrival of
>Doc Stalk), Cheryl gone & buried, they don't have a resident crazy person.
>I think they're setting up Tiff to take over the part, at least for a little
>while.  She definitely was out of touch on Fryday.
>
>						Chris

I don't think that Bobbie is too stable these days either ... she has
no clue that Tiff is emotionally attached to Lucas, and thinks that
because she and tiff are friends everything will work out fine.

Maybe they'll be thrown into a padded room together and made to
work things out!

Sus.

-- 

"A day without denial is a day you've got to face."
	--Calvin (to Hobbes)
Organization: Sophomore, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:19:09 -0500 
From: Jennifer Allyson Turner <jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: GH: Tracy (Demon Mother From Hell)

On Friday's show, I was surprised at Tracy's ultimatum (call me stupid).
 I thought for sure she'd tell Jenny to get out of Ned's life forever. 
Of course, that would've meant Paul and Jenny would get together for
sure, but I thought
Tracy was too stupid, or love-blind, or SOMETHING to see this (maybe
this is because she's been so blind to everything else).
 
Now that it looks like Ned and Jenny are together forever, where does
this leave Julia?!?  I won't be able to stand it if her recent behavior
becomes a permanent part of her character.  I had such high hopes for
Julia.  Someone please tell me that she won't turn into a home-wrecking
slut.
 
Since it's obvious that the writers intend to drag this thing out, why
can't they find someone else for Julia?  How about a new male character?
 Every other male on the show is either taken or marked for extinction.
 
Jenn
 
BTW, Scott said that he doesn't like Tracy as a villain (paraphrasing). 
My response is that she's not supposed to BE a villain.  She's a bitch,
pure and simple.  The difference is that villains are totally
irredeemable (the Cassadines, Faison), but even the bitchiest bitches
have feelings (somewhere, way WAY down deep).
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Thursday, 19 Nov 1992 11:29:06 MST
From: <IDSWB@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AW: Ryan, Grant, and Vicky

Tracey L. Evans writes:
>
>Hi everyone,
>
>I really enjoy reading this news group, although I must confess that I
>do not post very regularly (I'm just learning how to).  Anyway, after
>reading most of the postings, I have to put my two cents worth in!!
>
Welcome Tracy.  Happy to get your two cents and post often.

>As for Jamie and Kelsey, after seeing Thursday's show, part of me
>wanted Kelsey and Jamie to reunite, and the other part wanted Kelsey
>to explode for making yet another choice for her.  One thing I like
>about Kelsey is that she is willing to stand up for herself...I sure
>enjoyed many of Jamie and Kelsey's arguments.  I think it is this
>which makes them a great couple.  Unlike Marley, Kelsey is strong and
>has a mind of her own...she will disagree with Jamie and they will
>fight, but it will seem so much more productive (and entertaining)
>than when Jamie and Marley were together.  I hope that they can
>somehow get passed this (although I have no clue how).
>
I agree here.  It certainly makes a difference when each person stands
up for themselves during an argument.  It can be very difficult to do
without overpowering the other person.  Kelsey and Jamie do this very
well.  However, that still doesn't make me want to see St. Jamie get
his just rewards.  It's just too bad that Kelsey was the one that gave
it to him.  Could you imagine Jachel being the one to put him down a peg?
Hmm.....this could be an interesting idea.  Could she come down a peg too?

Oh, before I go, I just want to
>know what happened to Lorna.  When she first came to the show people
>did everything her way and she was very strong, now she crumbles
>whenever Kevin is present.  I hope he IS guilty so that we do not have
>to watch him anymore!
>
I have a feeling here regarding Kevin being guilty.  I think that he didn't
do it but, (remember the guy Kevin hired to do the testing of fabric for him?)
I think he did it.  He's giving away information too freely for him to be
innocent.

Sue
From: patstew@oz.plymouth.edu (Pat Steward)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Carter/Dupree/Billy
Date: 15 Nov 92 19:58:00 GMT
Reply-To: patstew@oz.plymouth.edu (Pat Steward)
Distribution: na
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, N.H.

In article <m1s9TB3w161w@cdthq.UUCP> mitch@cdthq.UUCP (Mitch Harris) writes:
>6500rick@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Richard J. Bessey) writes:
>
>> Sorry to ask a silly question, but...which one is Dupree?
>She was the blonde female lawyer Adam hired to start the custody battle over
>Junior.

Now THIS woman could ACT!  Makes me wish they'd chosen her for Galen
instead of the two losers they've had so far.  I wouldn't mind seeing
Dupree on a regular basis!

OH, and HEY, if they're going to dredge up Dixie's bar-fly past,
please please please bring back Bartender Billy and PLEASE let him
have grown his beard back!  He was such a *neat* character the first
time we saw him!
-- 
Patricia Martin Steward                      patstew@oz.plymouth.edu
I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is;
I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express senti-
ments that differentiate me from a doormat.       Rebecca West, 1913
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: joyce@dove.CS.YALE.EDU (linda joyce)
Subject: Re: ALL: TAN: Do the writers lurk?
Keywords: test
Organization: Yale University, Department of Computer Science, New Haven, CT
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:10:06 GMT

In article <AZDHZDOTW@linac.fnal.gov> lewis@linac.fnal.gov (June Cummins  
Lewis) writes:
> In article <1992Nov16.224018.16203@athena.mit.edu> zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu  
(Carolyn Zaccaria) writes:
> >In article <w637TB3w161w@cdthq.UUCP> mitch@cdthq.UUCP (Mitch Harris)  
writes:
> >>Well, I think they do. ANd if they do, I think it's stinky that they  
lurk 
> >>without letting us know for sure! So here's what I think they should  
do to 
> >
> >If they did let us know, they'd be in for a lot of "could you write  
this
> >this way and could you write that that way, and could you get rid of
> >so-and-so, and could you bring back so-and-so and on and on and on :-)
> >I don't actually blame them for keeping their identity a secret :-)
> >
> >>them make a boo-boo and loudly exclaim, "RATS!!"
> >
> >Brooke already did this one time. She said something to Craig,
> >"and with *RATS* like you" or something... it was sometime after
> >I asked them to say rats too...
> >
> >CAZ
> 
> And Janet did this, too.  She said "rats!" very distinctly into the
> mirror, and this was after we discussed the writers making one of the
> characters do it.  Does anyone else remember this?
> 
> June-Unit
> 
> -- 
> "Saying that men talk about baseball in	order to avoid talking  
about their
> feelings is the same as saying that women talk about their feelings in  
order
> to avoid talking about baseball."
> 			--Deborah Tannen, author of _You Just Don't  
Understand_
From: rick@sadtler.com (Rick Morris)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Is Salem short on people?
Date: 17 Nov 92 13:08:13 GMT
Organization: Sadtler Research Laboratories

Doreen Kayayayayasson wrote:
>
>     ...     But, why couldn't Marcus be a godparent (since he was
>Steve's best friend) or even John (Jack was in fact very close to the
>Izzy monster).  Very confusing.
>
>... Now, just give Marcus a REAL storyline!
>

It is my impression that a Godparent was supposed to be responsible for
the moral upbringing of the child in the case of the death of the parent.
Of course nowadays it is more of an honor than a responsibility.  Who is
more moral.  Bo or Marcus?

Morle.  Morale.  Morral.  Moral doesn't look right...

Gosh, Bo is married to Carly.  Marcus?  Can't even hold a storyline, the
bum, let alone a girl friend.  "Oh Marcus", sighs Gail...

Shaddup, Rick.  Not that Gail thing again!

-Rick.
-- 
Rick Morris                            Email:  rick@sadtler.com
Sadtler Research Labs, Philadelphia   -But I speak for myself
---------------------------------------------------------------
Organization: Sophomore, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:47:02 -0500 
From: Jennifer Allyson Turner <jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: AMC: emergency update - monday 11-16
	<1992Nov17.220126.1@acad2.alaska.edu>
Distribution: na

>I don't know, I would have thought that Edmund would suspect Helga...
>She protested the opening of the casket, was always interfering...
>I don't know why they never seem to suspect her... Even angelique should
>know her mother well enough... I'd think she would know that
>it was helga's wish to have angel be the mistress of wildwind and
>she'd stop at nothing to have that come true... Edmund seemed to
>distrust helga all this time, so why doesn't he think she might
>have made off w/the casket...  
> 
>Just something that's been bugging me for quite a while... Are they
>that blind to this helga's pettiness/vengence?

You know, I've been wondering the same thing.  Everyone knows how Helga
veritably foams at the mouth at the mere suggestion that Angel won't be
Mistress of Wildwind (she always says it like it's some kind of title,
like Duchess of York, or something).  How come no one's questioned her? 
I felt the same way about the will.  Why the heck doesn't anyone ask
that old bag any questions?  Did she weave a no-question-asking spell
around the people closest to Wildwind??

Jenn
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria)
Subject: Re: AMC: Goodbye Rats
Organization: MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:09:03 GMT

In article <2c40TB1w161w@cdthq.UUCP> mitch@cdthq.UUCP (Mitch Harris) writes:
>Patricia Peterson@nicmad.uucp (Patricia Peterson) writes:

>> It is with deep regret and sadness that I write to let you know that I will
>> probably be losing my net access soon.  My husband lost his job on Tuesday,
>> (the company he works for laid off 178 people), and I don't think they will
>> let us have net access at home for too long.

Dear Patricia, I'm sorry about your husband's job. I hope he finds some
good new work soon! we will miss you. It has been cool having you here
as one member of our "family"....:-)  Maybe you will have net.access
again soon, one just never knows!!! :-)

>> We also just adopted another stray cat.  A black and white that looks a lot
>> like the cat I had for 13 years while I was living in RI.   He is full of
>> hell and driving the dogs crazy.

Well, it is really nice to help strays. I give money to the Animal Rescue
League bi-annually, that is one charity I do contribute too (and my 
college), my apartment is too small for more cats but if I had more room,
I would probably have 20 and I might someday!! :-)

>> I don't know yet if we will be moving from Wisconsin or not, it depends on 
>> the job market here.  I really don't want to move, mainly because the girls 
>> are involved in so much around here, but time will tell.

That is hard, I think, uprooting children. I wish you the best. Whatever
you decide, it will work out. Optimism can go a long way! :-)

Good luck to Patricia, Dennis and the kids!

CAZ
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: ""I can resist anything but temptation"" <tburgess@us.oracle.com>
Subject: amc: haley and choppers
Original-To: amcnet
Organization: Computer Science, Indiana University
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 06:30:52 PST




Was it me or just sheer stupidity when on monday 11/16 Haley and Charlie
go to see the wicked witch....that after they have their chat they stay
in that place which is not safe to talk...because we all know that Helga
has a habit of lurking...for them to just stay in the living room and discuss
the case...I was blown away....You would think that a good PI would see
everyone as potential suspects...and when they discovered the differences
in the maid's story and helga's they would have gotten the hell out of dodge
to go somewhere safe to discuss the case...no light bulb flash there...

I know they are just amateur's and definitely not TAD!!

Maybe Tad will come back and put them out of business...well one could
only hope!

-tia
From: oman@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com (Diane at Allen-Bradley in Cleveland)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: Y&R Nicki's Hair (just adding the header)
Date: 19 Nov 92 12:52:07 EST

In article <1992Nov18.210049.6556@schbbs.mot.com>, C11815@maccvm.corp.mot.com (Josette Giacobbi) writes:
> KJa
> From: janet@cs.UAlberta.CA (Janet Service)
> iewsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
> Subject: Re: Y&R: Ryan/Victor/Victoria
> Message-ID: <1992Nov18.160705.19921@cs.UAlberta.CA>
> Date: 18 Nov 92 16:07:05 GMT
> References: <1992Nov17.205321.3205@ads.com>
> Sender: news@cs.UAlberta.CA (News Administrator)
> a
> Lines: 38
> Nntp-Posting-Host: menaik.cs.ualberta.ca
> 
> In article <1992Nov17.205321.3205@ads.com>, ellon@ADS.COM (Ellon St. Croix) writ
>>
>>
>>
>> >Ryan's got no power in this situation.  If he takes the check,
>> >he loses everything.  Will he realize this???  Will Victor
>> >stop the check?
>>
> Victor asked Ryan to show him the cheque, he sees it is made out for
> $1 million.  He proceeds to look very smug and goes on that he knew
> that Ryan had his price. etc. etc. He then asked for the cheque but
> Ryan said he hadn't finished with it.  He then tore it up.
>>
>>  I have a couple of things on this situation.
>>
>>  First...Victor CAN NOT fire Ryan just because he doesn't like him
>>  or because he slept with Vicki..That will just NOT stand up in court.
>>
>>  Second...Why is it that NO ONE has figured out that Ryan and Vicki
>>  are not LEGALLY married??????  How stupid are these people?  Not even
>>  Vic's lawyer caught this one.  I mean, Vic had Ryan arrested for
>>  criminal assult on a minor, like DUH.....She's a minor but she is
>>  married to this "slimy little bastard".
>>
> Victor's lawyer has had his secretary phoning around to find out
> where they were married.  They now realize that the states they have
> contacted have 18 years as the minimal age.  Victor is beginning to
> suspect the marriage is not legal.
> 
>>  Third...WHEN does Nikki have time to change her clothes and do her
>>  hair?  She has completely changed what she was wearing when she was
>>  with Vicki at Ryans apt. yet, everyone else is still wearing the same
> Janet said:
> 
> A few weeks ago Nikki was on the Canadian Shopping Network promoting
> hair care products.
> 
> -----
> Well, Nicki can use all the hair care help she can get, her hair
> looks like straw.   josette
From: golds_ss@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Stuart S Goldstone)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: OLTL: Update for Tuesday, 11/17
Date: 18 Nov 92 14:35:09 GMT
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore

In article <8f2M6w_00iV1E661Mq@andrew.cmu.edu> Jennifer Allyson Turner
<jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>
>Viki shows up at Andrew's (cute haircut!)

	Yuck!  Andrew's haircut makes his head look too big!

>A shrink? Viki enquires.  He's a good frined of mine,
>Andy says.  He really helped Sarah out a lot.  He then gives her Michael
>(YOWZA!) JONAS' (YOWZA!) telephone number.
	[...]
>At Llanfair, Viki is thinking about Clint and Kevin.  She looks at
>pictures of them on her desk (Kevin looks REALLY good in that picture!),
>then digs out the paper with Michael (YOWZA!) Jonas' (YOWZA!) phone
>number on it.  

	Okay, I just started watching OLTL this summer.  What's the
significance of this Michael Jonas guy?

>Trivia questions for this week:
>
>WHODUNIT?
>
>These three Buchanan women have all been accused of murder (two of them
>were even convicted).  Who have they been accused of murdering?  Did
>they really do it?  And if not, whodunit?  For bonus points, can you
>name which two were convicted?
>
>1) Tina
>2) Renee
>3) Sarah

	Well like I said, I started watching this summer, and Sarah was in
the middle of being tried for the murder of Carlo Hesser.  I don't remember
if she got convicted, but of course she was set free, since that teenage
girl (Alex's niece?) did it, the one that Alex sent to Havana.  (Hey, why
did Alex send this girl to Cuba if she was the one who murdered her husband?)

-- 
         Stuart S. Goldstone          |  "If it's true that one person always
Internet: golds_ss@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu |    loves more than the other, why not
       BITNET: golds_ss@jhuvms        |     be the one who feels the most?"
         GEnie: S.GOLDSTONE1          |                -- TORCH SONG TRILOGY
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: dwv@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (Dave Vollman)
Subject: Re: AMC : Kidnapping tips
Organization: HASA "S" Division
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 19:10:40 GMT

In article <wu4kuB3w161w@cdthq.UUCP> mitch@cdthq.UUCP (Mitch Harris) writes:
>Hey, Dave!
>I scanned an article in Newsweek not too long ago. I remember it saying that 
>soon cellular phones would be bouncing their signals off sattelites, and it 
>would be harder to trace then. Any truth to this?

Hey Beverly!

	It will be harder to trace because you will lose your
	direction vector. Plus, that 45,000 mile round trip
	to a bird in clarke orbit might cause a little
	trouble. 
	
	
-- 
				| Dave Vollman (HASA "S" Division)
  If I have a choice for the	| AT&T Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL
  next life, trained seal is 	| Email: dwv@ihlpm.att.com
  looking damn good!		| AT&T would never let ME speak for THEM!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps