HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gt0040a@prism.gatech.EDU (Thomas Michael Sorensen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: A few questions...
Date: 17 Apr 92 17:19:35 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In <1992Apr13.025046.4534@samba.oit.unc.edu> Jyri.Virkki@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Jyri Virkki) writes:

>Still, I have a few doubts. Mainly, I'd like to know whether OS/2's interface
>is mostly gui-type (a la Windows), or just shell's-in-windows (a la X-win.)?

You can have it either way- either use the standard WPS, which is excellent,
or drag as many copies of the OS/2 Window into your Startup folder as you
so wish.
     Tom Sorensen
-- 
Tom Sorensen              gt0040a@prism.gatech.edu
Georgia Tech 
And no, I don't like this .signature.
From: parker@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Jeffrey D. Parker)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: YACR (Yet Another Cron Request)
Keywords: cron, chron, os2, etc.
Date: 13 Apr 92 17:39:53 GMT

Sorry.  I know I have seen this request before at least half a dozen
times.  But, I need a version of Cron for OS/2.  I tried chron23.zoo
from the OS/2 archives, but it has a bug in the date handling.  I will
be sending off a bug report to the authors' CI$ address.  However, in
the meantime, I was hoping someone knew of another one.

Any help is much appreciated.

	Jeff P.
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: SVGA drivers for OS/2 2.0 compatibility.
Date: 7 Apr 92 02:10:17 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1992Apr7.012704.18089@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> ashwath@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Ashwath Ram) writes:
>I have a Gateway 2000 machine and a SVGA color monitor with
>1 Mb. Gateway supplied the drivers to run under Win 3.0 will
>these same drivers run under OS/2 or has IBM provided 
>drivers with OS/2. Ithink it is a Tseng chip set.

Yes, the Windows 3.0 drivers should work fine under OS/2 2.0 for
running Windows programs (one or more) on Windows desktop(s).  For
so-called "seamless Windows" (where the Windows applications run
alongside OS/2 applications on OS/2's Workplace Shell desktop) or a
high resolution (beyond VGA) Workplace Shell you'll need a new driver.
Find out what sort of SuperVGA adapter you have (you said Tseng; I
assume that's Tseng 4000) and watch comp.binaries.os2 for the drivers
to appear.  In all probability it should be in the next few weeks.

Trident drivers are out already.  More SuperVGA support should come
soon.
-- 
Timothy F. Sipples       Keeper of the OS/2 Frequently Asked Questions
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu  List, available via anonymous ftp from
Dept. of Economics       128.123.35.151, directory pub/os2/faq, or via
Univ. of Chicago  60637  netmail from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
Subject: Re: Some questions
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 19:23:28 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

Yeah, double your ram.
-- 
Bob Cain    rcain@netcom.com   408-358-2007

"There are some strings.  They're just not attached."
                                                    Victoria Roberts
Organization: European Academic Research Network
Date: Friday, 17 Apr 1992 14:32:49 GMT
From: Turgut Kalfaoglu <TURGUT@FRMOP11.BITNET>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: ever changing NT (MS running scared...?)
 <1992Apr15.045643.4061@midway.uchicago.edu>
 <1992Apr15.190811.17206@digi.lonestar.org>
 <1992Apr16.013849.3705@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>

Wow! Microsoft NT sounds really great! It can almost do everything that
OS/2 2.0 can! (pant pant) it *also* has great reviews! I bet it will
be as great as Windows 3.0 :))

(sorry, couldn't help  it :))    -turgut
From: des@frogland.inmos.co.uk (David Shepherd)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 in UK
Date: 7 Apr 92 14:30:49 GMT
Organization: INMOS architecture group

In article <26898@wraxall.inmos.co.uk>, des@frogland.inmos.co.uk (David Shepherd) writes:
>warning: the show is extortionately expensive to get into (#20 unless
>you'd already managed to find a way of getting free tickets) ... as they
>are clearly trying to stop it being swamped by schoolkids etc.

just been reading newspapers ... had i bought todays daily telegraph
(~ #0.40) i'd would have got free entry .... sigh :-)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
david shepherd: des@inmos.co.uk or des@inmos.com    tel: 0454-616616 x 625
                inmos ltd, 1000 aztec west, almondsbury, bristol, bs12 4sq
		"i speak latin to god,   spanish to men,   french to women 
		 and german to my horse."             - charles v of spain
From: yon%smltlk.cbm.dec.com@decwrl.dec.com (David A. Yon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Is this really Seamless?
Date: 10 Apr 92 11:41:28 GMT
Reply-To: yon%smltlk.cbm.dec.com@decwrl.dec.com (David A. Yon)
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.misc
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation

Hi,

	I just read the Petzhold article in PC Mag about OS/2 2.0.
He showed a screen shot of the "Seamless Windows" support.  To me it
looked like all you could do was run AN ENTIRE WINDOWS DESKTOP inside
of a scrollable OS/2 PM window.  It looked like you were forced to have
a Program Manager in each one of these desktops as well.

	I ask you... is that really the "Seamless Windows" support 
that has been so hyped?  If so I'm pretty depressed, and will 
probably wait for most of my Win apps to be ported to native OS/2
before switching.  To me, "seamless" meant having individual Windows
apps, each wrapped in a PM window.  This would be akin to running an
OpenLook program under the Motif window manager, where inside the
window it was pure OpenLook Widgets, but it was wrapped with the
Motif resize handles.

	Can someone please tell me that this isn't the case?  I
*really* want to believe in OS/2.  (I've also heard that seamless
8514 support is out for the time being, and that's a BIG factor
for me)

--
David Yon
yon%smltlk.cbm.dec.com@decwrl.dec.com <--- use this address
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: smsmith@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Smith)
Subject: Re: i don't like it!!
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: comp
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 02:21:21 GMT

"bradley grigor" <bradley.grigor@canrem.com> writes:

>I have seen OS/2 2.0 GA and I'm not impressed.  How can I get rid
>of the Workplace Shell??  I _really_ don't like it.  Does OS/2
>2.0 include the original 1.3 PMSHELL somewhere?  As much as I
>hate to say it, Windows 3 (and OS/2 1.3 for that matter) is
>aesthetically much nicer and a darn site easier to use.  This is
>going to take A LOT of getting used to.

It takes a while to get used to.  The key is the right mouse button.
It's *great* to be able to create directories, move files, delete
files/directories, view files, print files, create shadows, change 
colors, etc. etc. without the use of kludgy menus and typing on the 
keyboard!!!  Give it a chance.
From: holmes@gorilla.nbn.com (Tim Holmes)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: FAT vs HPFS
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 09:41:36 PDT
Organization: Summary Insight

So my 2.0 upgrade is on the way.  Just sent in the upgrade form.  
I'm looking for feedback on the relative merits of HPFS vs FAT.
I will probably start with FAT if only because I have 4 megs, and
this is (according to recent posts) not enough to use HPFS.  

But what actual performance differences would I notice with HPFS and
6-8 megs of memory?  What would be the practical advantages?


==========================================================================
Tim Holmes             holmes@gorilla.nbn.com             San Rafael, CA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rafetmad@cheshire.oxy.edu (David R. Giller)
Subject: Re: Tseng Labs (ET4000) drivers!
Organization: Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041 USA.
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 09:39:46 GMT

In article <kuq4foINN9sl@coltexo.cs.utexas.edu> easyrob@cs.utexas.edu (Robert Depew Reynolds) writes:
>I talked to somebody a TSENG labs.  He said that IBM had been giving them
>a hard time about 2.0 drivers. (Wouldn't that be the stupidest thing to do.)
>He estimated the drivers would be available in 2 MONTHS!!!!!
>
>It sounds as though IBM wants to clear all drivers themselves, and release
>them in their own CSD.  I heard the same above story from the guys at
>Creative Labs about drivers for my SoundBlaster Pro.  I guess the only way
>to get SVGA drivers now is to get in on a beta program.  I just wish more
>companies had the liberal beta programs that Trident has, give it to everybody
>and let the problem reports roll in.

Well, I don't want to be overly negative here, but I've never heard anything
from either TSENG, Orchid, nor Creative Labs but BS.  After all, Trident
was able to produce drivers (with Seamless, no less) ON THE DAY OF GA
(Thanks, Stone!).  Hardly sounds to me like IBM is giving them a hard
time.

In addition, I'm not going to talk about it, but the little interaction
I have had with CL as a developer has left me more than a little bit
bitter.

In other words, don't lose hope.  I suspect that they are just covering
their rear ends by making up stories.  We'll probably get drivers before
too long.  And if not, we can sell our boards to a Windows user.

>Everyone who owns a board based on the ET4000 should call Tseng Labs and
>give them a hard time, so that they release there drivers in beta form!!

>Thanks to the latest PC Magazine articles on Windows 3.1 their phone
>number is (215) 968-0502. 8-) BIG smile!

Good idea.  Be mean, too.

-Dave
-- 
David Giller, Box 134 | Q: How many Oregonians does it take to screw in a light
Occidental College    | bulb?  A: Three.  One to replace the bulb, and two to
1600 Campus Road      | fend off all the Californians trying to share the
Los Angeles, CA 90041 | experience. ---------------------------rafetmad@oxy.edu
From: jeff@fang.clearpoint.com (Jeffrey J. Griglack)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Some questions about OS/2......
Date: 15 Apr 92 23:28:04 GMT
	<1992Apr15.145802.19169@uwm.edu>
Reply-To: jeff@fang.clearpoint.com
Organization: /home/jeff/.organization


Does OS/2 support the concept of soft links (like BSD)?
--

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Jeff Griglack             |  "The best kind of friend is like iron sharpening|
|jeff@fang.clearpoint.com  |  iron" -- "The Reptiles and I" by Shriek Back    |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: vandendo@qucis.queensu.ca (Christian Vandendorpe)
Subject: Re: Trident Drivers and GA
Organization: Computing & Information Science, Queen's University at Kingston
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 10:34:05 GMT

Well, I finally found the reason why I could not get GA to work in svga mode
with my Trident card and the Trident drivers posted on cboo. The reason
is quite simple actually, the command "SVGA ON" HAS TO BE RUN FROM A
DOS FULLSCREEN window. Sorry for the caps, but it did take me 3 hours
to figure out :-) .

If the command is run from a dos window, then the card you have is not 
recognized properly. The easiest way to make sure that OS/2 recognized
your card after typing "SVGA ON" is to look at the file \OS2\SVGADATA.PMI.
At the top it will say what card it thinks you have.

Mr Sipples, you forgot to include the file W800.DRV in the TRIOS220.ZOO
package, it is needed to run windows in 800x600x16  :-)
(hmm unless I made a mistake.. but the file W800SL.DRV is copied in
the windows directory as SWINVGA.DRV and therefore the file VGA.DRV is
not changed and still contains the driver for 640x480x16 which makes
your WINOS2 abort with a fatal exit code 0x04????)

Christian


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
= vandendo@qucis.queensu.ca		| "I only know that I know nothing" =
= vandendo@qucdn.queensu.ca		|		  - Socrates        =
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: eger@xi.cs.fsu.edu (Robert Eger)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Why should I upgrade?
Date: 14 Apr 92 14:32:04 GMT
Article-I.D.: mailer.1992Apr9.171132.6448
Reply-To: eger@nu.cs.fsu.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: total lack of...

In article <1992Apr9.104843.23694@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> eger@nu.cs.fsu.edu writes:
>This question has probably been asked and answered a thousand times,
>so I apologize in advance.  I just the other day got my Win 3.1
>upgrade from MS for $49.  I did not know anything about OS/2 2.0
>at the time I ordered my Win upgrade.  I am interested in getting
>OS/2 because DOS is garbage (640k limit and all that).  Is it
>worth the extra $$ (considering I just shelled out the money for
>the Win upgrade) to get the OS/2 upgrade?  What will I gain?  Will
>I be able to use all my apps (W4W 2.0, Excel, etc...)?
>
>Email replies if you want to save bandwidth.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Robert Eger
>eger@nu.cs.fsu.edu
>
>
One more thing - will I be able to play all those diversions (read games)
that I have for my system?

btw - I have a Gateway 486/33, 8mb, 210mb IDE drive, ATI Graphics Ultra
      w/1mb, 15" flat screen 1280x1024 non-interlaced monitor

Is it worth it for me?

Robert Eger
eger@nu.cs.fsu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: dougb@novell.com (Doug Barlow)
Subject: Re: Phoning Diamond about Drivers.
Organization: Novell Inc.,Provo, UT, USA 
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 23:24:05 GMT

In article <17506.29ec6089@ecs.umass.edu> horan@ecs.umass.edu writes:
>Does anyone have a number for Diamond (as in diamand speedstar).
>I'm trying to call and ask about drivers for my card, but no one answers
>the number:
>408-736-2000
>
>Is there a new one?  Or has anyone heard news?
>

That's the correct number.  They don't have an 800 number :-(.  
Their phone system sucks.  One time you call, you get an operator.  Another
time, you get automated crap.  Still another, it rings until you hang up.

Does Diamond not have enough people to answer their phones?              
It seems that no one can answer the phone right
when I call.  I wait on hold for 20-infinity minutes and then I get voice
mail.  Lately, I have tried using people's names (hoping I get the operator 
when I call ) but I still get voice mail.

I left numerous voice mail messages and maybe someone will call.

Here's the latest word I have heard on video drivers:
-------------------------------------------------------
(According to Todd in Tech support on 4/14)
They ARE getting some drivers in about a couple of weeks for OS/2.  
They DON'T have
any to beta test.  I only asked them about Stealth board drivers.  I would
assume they would have Speedstar drivers too.
I Don't know if Diamond is writing the drivers or they will be generic
from another company like S3.  (I am trying to find out and will let you
know).

I love the board.  It's very fast.  But the poor service might turn away
customers.

My personal ratings of Diamond:

Products vs. Cost:  A+
800 number: F
phone hold time:  D-  (usually 10+ minutes)
Availability of drivers for older products: B+ (WP 5.1, CADs, WIN 3.0)
Availability of drivers for brand new products: D  (Windows 3.1 support)
Friendliness of people on the phone: A
People returning calls: D-
Phone system: F-

Doug Barlow (personal opinion above)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doug Barlow                   Email: DOUGB@NOVELL.COM
Novell, Inc.  Provo, UT
            The opinions expressed above are solely my own and
	    do not in any way represent the opinions of Novell, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.misc:11201 comp.windows.ms:12193
From: ahoi@vipunen.hut.fi (Arto J Hoikkala)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.windows.ms
Subject: Win & OS/2 question form
Date: 10 Apr 92 01:04:53 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland


 
Hi Windows or OS/2 user. Would you like to share your opinions
and knowlegde of PC-operating systems? R)reply to this form and
I will post summary on net. If you have no idea or opinion of
answer just leave that "?" untouched.
 
Oh, do not accidentally F)ollowup, we don't want that.
 
Summary will include:	Windows users answers (averaged).
			OS/2 users answers (averaged).
			All answers averaged.
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  
			  Windows		     OS/2
 
Fill with: YES / NO
 
Currently I use:	3.0  ?			1.3  ?
(or beta)		3.1  ?			2.0  ?
 
Fill with: N=No / P=Poor / F=Fair / G=Good / V=Very good / E=Excellent
 
Application avail.	3.0  ?			1.3  ?
(all apps)		3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
Application avail.	3.0  ?			1.3  ?
(native apps)		3.1  ? (3.0 apps?)	2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ? (2.0 apps?)
 
 
GUI usability:
 
(GUI) General		3.0  ?			1.3  ?
			3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
(GUI) Configurability	3.0  ?			1.3  ?
			3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
(GUI) File handling	3.0  ?			1.3  ?
			3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
(GUI) Object oriented	3.0  ?			1.3  ?
features		3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
 
Compability:
 
Compability		3.0  ?			1.3  ?
(DOS apps)		3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
Compability		3.0  ?			1.3  ?
(Win apps)		3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
Compability		3.0  ?			1.3  ?
(OS/2 apps)		3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ? 
 
 
Performance:
 
System			3.0  ?			1.3  ?
			3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
Native applications	3.0  ?			1.3  ?
			3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
 
General crash prot.:	No / Poor / Fair / Good / Very good / Excellent
Protects itself/apps	no /  Sometimes	 /     Usually	    / almost always
 
Protection		3.0  ?			1.3  ?
(DOS apps)		3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
Protection		3.0  ?			1.3  --
(Win apps)		3.1  ?			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
Protection		3.0  --			1.3  ?
(OS/2 apps)		3.1  --			2.0  ?
			NT   ?			2.x  ?
 
 
Hardware needed to gain Poor to Fair / Good to Very good / Excellent
performance:
 
Processor eg. 286/386/486 
			3.0  ?/?/?		1.3  ?/?/?
			3.1  ?/?/?		2.0  ?/?/?
			NT   ?/?/?		2.x  ?/?/?
 
RAM MBs e.g. 2/4/6	3.0  ?/?/?		1.3  ?/?/?
			3.1  ?/?/?		2.0  ?/?/?
			NT   ?/?/?		2.x  ?/?/?
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Arto
--
	* Arto.Hoikkala@hut.fi * ahoi@niksula.hut.fi *
Help me! I have lost my .signature (#%&$#! those .sig viruses)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: kap1@icarus.spc.uchicago.edu (Dietrich Kappe)
Subject: Re: OS2 My experience/minor problems
Organization: Center for Population Economics
	<1992Apr9.190615.1209@midway.uchicago.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 01:22:39 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.190615.1209@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:


   I really like how configurable it is.  It has system administrators
   worried (let them be  :-)), but for people actually using the systems
   it is great.  

Gee Tim, I'm not worried, are you? :-)

--

---
Dietrich Kappe
kap1@icarus.spc.uchicago.edu
Center for Population Economics
From: backman@vax (Larry Backman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: RPC or TCP/IP on OS/2
Date: 17 Apr 92 17:50:50 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: FTP Software, Inc., Wakefield, MA
Nntp-Software: PC/TCP NNTP


 >> Hi folks--
 >> Does anyone have any knowledge of RPC (Remote Procedure Call) or any TCP/IP
 >> (specifically socket) libraries available for use with Microsoft C 6.0 on
 >> OS/2 1.3?

PCTCP for OS/2 V1.2 has a multi-threaded standalone RPC DLL.
I believe IBM's TCP/IP for OS2 has RPC support also.


Larry Backman
backman@ftp.com
From: jsvec@umaxa.weeg.uiowa.edu (Joe Svec)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Requestor --> $200!!
Date: 8 Apr 92 05:21:58 GMT
Organization: U of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

In article <1992Apr07.233508.7687@slate.mines.colorado.edu> cjmarsha@slate.mines.colorado.edu (Charles Marshall) writes:
>The latest I heard is that the requestor for OS/2 will be available
>April 30 and will cost $200.  It is a seperate package from OS/2 2.0.
>What?
>Is IBM kidding?  Don't they think it is going to be hard enough to get
>millions of DOS users to switch os's and $50 to $200 bucks a shot?  And
>then they have to pay an extra $200 to connect to there network!  Novell
>is holding 70 to 80 percent of the networked market.  The requestor 
>should definitely be included if IBM wants OS/2 to fly in the corporations.
>

OOOOOOOO Rickin' crackin' smickin' smackin' frickin' frackin'...  Well,
the guys downstairs are pissed off enough at me becuase I bug them EVERY DAY
about UPGRADING to 2.0, and we just got 1.3 up and running 3 weeks ago!!!
I want TCP/IP services too.  Won't NW Requester be available cheaper to those
who already have it??

What OTHER OPTIONS are there for sharing printers, etc, etc.  I want my own 
OS/2 server anyway.  They are accusing OS/2 of all sorts of things going wrong
on the net (primarily a bunch of DOS machines hanging off of NW 3.11 servers,
and, right now, my ONE OS/2 1.3 "workstaion" with a few more to come.)

They're scared to hook up the other OS/2 machines because they think it's 
going to blow everything up!!!  It's a bunch of crap - the problems are
network topography (?!) and wiring problems...  I can't seem to get them 
to believe that.

Where can I get info on IBMs LanServer OS/2 or whatever it's called??

Joe Svec
(jsvec@umaxa.weeg.uiowa.edu or preferably svec@act-act6-po.act.org)
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Is GA beta code? NEW version of OS/2
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:28:14 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <70051@ut-emx.uucp> mo@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Mohit Goyal) writes:
>Hello.  I read in one of the Fido messages TFS posted that the Boca team
>re-compiled OS/2 2.0 at 5am April 1st.  They did some extra work so that
>they could come up with a clean compile and no error messages, and that
>GA is now 6.307N.  I was wondering if anyone can verify this.  I'm 
>curious because I have heard about some tiny bugs in GA, and so the 
>recompile story seems somewhat plausible.  Hope I'm not spreading too
>much FUD!  :)

I did not post that information, nor have I seen it confirmed.
However, anything coming to you as "GA" can be updated using a CSD
when the time comes.
-- 
Timothy F. Sipples       Keeper of the OS/2 Frequently Asked Questions
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu  List, available via anonymous ftp from
Dept. of Economics       128.123.35.151, directory pub/os2/faq, or via
Univ. of Chicago  60637  netmail from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET.