HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: moore@iastate.edu (Brian J Moore)
Subject: Re: Why go to 3.1 if 2.0 works
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 01:44:40 GMT

In <1992Apr11.132541.26604@engr.uark.edu> dch2@engr.uark.edu (David Hobbs) writes:

>At the rollout at my local IBM yesterday, I saw the film at Comdex where
>IBM was running 3.1 in a OS/2Win along with DOS and other OS/2 programs.
>Reiswig(sp?) joked and said something to the effect of "Look what we've
>done just 24 hrs. after 3.1 was released..."

And now I'll ask the question everyone really wanted to know....

Will OS/2 run my DOS games in a box? (or at all?)

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________________
  /                                  /                                    /
 /  Brian J. Moore                  /                  moore@iastate.edu /
/__________________________________/____________________________________/
From: john.will@satalink.com (John Will)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: "HIDDEN" MEMORY IN WINDOW
Date: 14 Apr 92 19:38:00 GMT
Reply-To: john.will@satalink.com (John Will)
Organization: Satalink Info Systems - Huntingdon Valley, PA - 215-364-3324

TO: ed@kpc.com
EL.I know the answer to this has been posted in the past, but alas, our
  .newsgroups expire pretty quickly.  I've got a 486/33 with 64 Megs running
  .QEMM 6.01.  Fairly normal setup otherwise.  Under Windows, Enhanced mode
  .only gives me 42 Megs free including the swap.

I don't know why you don't show more memory, but with that amount of
memory, why in the world do you specify a swap file???
---
 . KingQWK 1.05 . Bigomy: one wife too many.  Monogamy: same idea.
                          
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: sgm@cunyvms1.gc.cuny.edu
Subject: 3.1 and Stacker/SuperStor
Reply-To: sgm@cunyvms1.gc.cuny.edu
Organization: Computer Center, CUNY Graduate School, New York NY 10036
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 16:03:13 GMT

My copy of Win 3.1 is in the mail and I *know* that I now absolutely
have to do something about the overcrowded condition of my (lonely)
65 mg RLL hard drive.  The best I can afford is either Stacker or
SuperStor.  Before I make the purchase, I'd like to check and ask if
anyone out there has any comments on Stacker v. SuperStor, especially
in conjunction with Win 3.1.  BTW: I'm referring to the brand new version
of SUperStor - 2.0.

Thanks in advance.
Sheila Meltzer
sgm@cunyvms1.gc.cuny.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Is there a Procomm Plus for Windows in the works?
From: dhawan@vax1.umkc.edu
Date: 4 Apr 92 15:21:26 CST
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Missouri-Kansas City

I have seen a pre-beta copy of PCPLUS/WINDows at my local user group meeting
and from what I saw back then (and reported on this group), it looks like a
worthwhile program over Crosstalk etc.

The one thing that was unplanned then was that Datastorm was not producing
their own COMM driver.  I bet they were waiting for Win 3.1 to see how their
driver worked and then decide if they needed to write their own or license
another (like Turbocomm's maybe??_

Tej
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Trident blues
From: lee_g@qis.dofasco.ca
Date: 1 Apr 92 10:40:16 GMT
Organization: Dofasco Inc, Hamilton, Ont. Can.
Nntp-Posting-User: lee_g

Hi to all concerned,

As requested by popular demand (via e-mail), the Trident BBS phone number

is (415) 691-1016.  The BBS is located in San Fransisco.

                                 ...Gary
From: gwe@cbnews.cb.att.com (george.w.erhart)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: SoundBlaster Pro Drivers for Win 3.1
Date: 15 Apr 92 11:45:23 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <BMpA02.MGA@world.std.com> gunther@world.std.com (Gunther W Anderson) writes:
>In regards to posting the drivers files to some archive site, the readme's
>in the package specifically prohibit this. 

If you or a friend has purchased the Windows Resource Tool kit, check out
the drivers directory on the disk. You should find the latest SB Pro
drivers.

-- 
George Erhart
AT&T Bell Laboratories
Columbus, Ohio
att!archie!gwe or gwe@archie.att.com
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: rtc@sgfb.ssd.ray.com (Custer)
Subject: SmartDrive 4.0, FastDisk AND Stacker ??
Organization: Raytheon Company, Portsmouth, RI
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 20:25:30 GMT

The subject says it all.  When I finally do install Win 3.1 (next few days)
can SmartDrive and FastDisk be used on the Stacker volume ?  My guess is
that SmartDrive might work (although there is supposed to be something in
win31 readme.ini that says not to use it) and that FastDisk doesn't have
a chance of working with Stacker.  Anyone know the answer(s) ?

Todd Custer
Raytheon Company
Portsmouth, RI
rtc@sgfb.ssd.ray.com
From: griphg@yvax.byu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: When DR scams, it's ok? Was Re: Win3.1/DR DOS 6.0/SuperS...
Date: 8 Apr 92 13:58:33 -0700
Organization: Brigham Young University

In article <11320@mindlink.bc.ca>, Robert_Salesas@mindlink.bc.ca (Robert Salesas) writes:
>> David E. Watson writes:
>>
>>
>> I found out that the version of SuperStor that comes with DR-DOS was crippled
>> to only work with DR-DOS.  The SuperStor driver will not recongnize another
>> operating system.  This was confirmed by tech support at AddStor (the
>> people who make SuperStor).  Now I had recently upgraded my version of
>> SuperStor to v.2.0 through AddStor.  According to AddStor, this
>> version will recongnize MS-DOS.
>>
>>
>> --David
>> --
>>
>> ***********************************(+)**************************************
>>  David Watson      Internet: dew@Turing.acs.Virginia.EDU      (804)295-6736
>>  Pony Express: 2111 Michie Drive #77, Charlottesville, Virginia  22901-2872
>> ***********************************(-)**************************************
>>
>
>
> Interesting.  I hope MS bashers take note.  While all the claims that MS
> "cheats" by placing code to check for OS/2 or DR-DOS, have been unfounded, DR
> plainly admits that it limits components of it's DOS to only work with itself.
> How many people are going to condem DR for doing that?  How many would if it
> was MS who did that?
>
> Rob
>
> --
> \--------------------------------------------------------------------/
> \ Robert Salesas             + Usenet: Robert_Salesas@MINDLINK.bc.ca /
> \ Eschalon Development Inc.  + CIS:    76625,1320    BYTE:  newdawn  /
> \--------------------------------------------------------------------/

Try running any MS-DOS system software from another version of DOS, and you'll
get "Wrong DOS version".  ALL DOS SYSTEM SOFTWARE DOES THIS, even that made by
Microsoft.

Jerry Griph
griphg@yvax.byu.edu
From: btsg6965@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Briand T Sanderson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Winword 2.0a --> The case of the lost mouse pointer.
Date: 14 Apr 92 06:55:53 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

Has anyone had a similar experience: I started using Winword 2.0a after
installing Windows 3.1. Now it seems, whenever I type, the mouse pointer 
disappears. It reappears when I touch the mouse, but if I start to type, it
goes away again. I also noticed that the SLANTED CURSOR for Italics doesn't
seem to work with TrueType fonts!!!!

Anyone have any clues about what is going on here?

B. Sanderson
From: drv@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dennis.r.vogel)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: W4W 2.0 & Excel Printing Problems
Keywords: Adobe Type Manager Bitstream Facelift Word for Windows Excel
Date: 13 Apr 92 16:52:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

Here's some more info on my Windows 3.1/Word for Windows printing
problem.  Last night I was able to make my system lock up every
time by merely starting Word for Windows 2.0.  No documents had
to be opened, no fonts selected, no printing.  This was with ATM
and Facelift running.

A similar software setup on another machine (at work) does not
lock up printing Postscript to a file (no printer is attached
to this machine) but I don't get any of the ATM fonts when I print.
Only difference, other than machine make, is this one is running
DOS 4.01 where my home machine is 5.0.

Still open for suggestions.  I'm going to call Microsoft soon.

Dennis R. Vogel
AT&T Bell Laboratories
Middletown, NJ
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: daw50509@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Don A. Walthers)
Subject: Re: Win 3.1 and WinGif?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 19:17:24 GMT

echuang@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Ernest Y. Chuang) writes:

>Does anyone out there with Windows 3.1 use WinGif?  It worked fine
>for me under Windows 3.0, but after I upgraded to 3.1, it gives me
>an error every time I try to load a .gif file (it still seems to
>load other formats ok).  I'm just wondering if it's a real 
>incompatibility, or if it's just my system.  I think the version of
>WinGif I have is 1.0.

wingif 1.4 works fine under win 3.1. it should be on cica or wuarchive or
maybe msdos.archive.umich.edu. i don't remember where i got it from.


-- 
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Don Walthers : daw50509@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu : University of Illinois at U-C |
| -Where alcohol and academics go hand-in-hand, so they say.              |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: btsg6965@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Briand T Sanderson)
Subject: MS W4W 2.0 and WIN 3.1 -- Install the TrueType Fonts!
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 08:55:12 GMT

I just finished installing Win 3.1 today. I thought I'd post a suggestion
for those of you who use the Equation Editor under Word For Windows. You will
need to copy the TRUETYPE version of the MT Extra and Fences Fonts from Disk
3 of the Word for Win disks. These will need to be decompressed. Then use the
control panel to install the two TrueType fonts. Now all will be okay with
the Equation editor.

Thought you might like to know...

Briand Sanderson
From: altman@sbpmt.cs.sunysb.edu (Jeff Altman)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Win3.1 Delay ..
Date: 11 Apr 92 00:46:30 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook

In article <1992Apr9.191047.5538@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> drv@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dennis.r.vogel) writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.165610.1949@sbcs.sunysb.edu>, altman@sbpmt.cs.sunysb.edu (Jeff Altman) writes:
>> 
>> AllType versions 1.0 and 1.1 do not correctly convert Type 1 fonts to TrueType.
>
>Can you be more specific?  Is there a generic problem that
>prevents all fonts from working?  Or only specific fonts?
>Or only specific aspects of some fonts?  Anything that can
>help us decide if we should wait for the new version or
>muddle through for now would be helpful.
>

As I have mentioned in previous postings requesting a method for getting 
around these problems:

Original Type 1				Resulting True Type
Family Name		Style		Family Name		Style
==============================================================================
Optima 			Regular		Optima			Regular
Optima			Bold		Optima-Bold		Regular
Optima			Italic		Optima-Italic		Regular
Optima			Bold-Italic	Optima-Bold-Italic	Regular

This prevents me from being able to use the fonts with any Windows application
in the method with which they are meant to be used.  Instead of one font name
with styles selected via buttons or dialog boxes, there are four font names for
each font and styles can not be selected by dialog box or button.

Any suggestions?


>Dennis R. Vogel
>AT&T Bell Laboratories
>Middletown, NJ


--
- Jeff  | Altmania Productions     |================================|
 ~   ~	| 322 Old Town Road        | jaltman    @ ccmail.sunysb.edu |
 * | *	| East Setauket, New York  | altman     @ sbcs.sunysb.edu   |
\_____/	| 11733                    | 71530.3252 @ CompuServe.COM    |
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn)
Subject: Re: Why I'm sticking with Windows
Organization: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 03:16:14 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.003354.5054@scott.skidmore.edu> pvonk@scott.skidmore.edu (Pierre VonKaenel) writes:

>[A serious question.... no flame intended...]

Not to worry, I'm wearing my asbestos undies.  Besides, its a very good 
question.
/>
/>Would you seriously give up UNIX on all your gov't computers in your
/>department for NT?  Would the wizards let you do that???
/> 
/>Pierre von Kaenel	| Skidmore College	     | pvonk@scott.skidmore.edu

A lot of the Unix apps are written instandard c and should therefore
be able to be ported to NT with a simple recompile (I hope).  Thus I
don't forsee too many complaints - especially if the benefit is running
the same apps across all platforms.  On the Indigo's, I've been told
that it should be a simple (I probably wouldn't use this term) matter
to port over the molecular modelling programs that they are currently
being used for.

I bet the real problem will be with the support people.  With only one
OS platform, a few of them might have to find other work. ;-}


--
Donald A. Lehn, Ph.D.                      Phone: (301) 496-2885
Bldg.37 Rm 3D20                            FAX:   (301) 496-8419
National Cancer Institute / NIH            Email: donnel@helix.nih.gov
Bethesda MD 20892
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: regoli@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Michael Regoli)
Subject: Re: ATM 2.0 and Win 3.1: Incompatible?
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 92 21:14:59 GMT

In <1992Apr9.185944.14687@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
regoli@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Michael Regoli) writes: 


>Has anyone with ATM2.0 and Win3.1 been able to access the "Fonts" section
>of the Control panel of a non-Windows application (e.g., Telix or DOS
>session)?  I'm running Win3.1 in 386 enhanced mode, and see no "Font"
>option as described on page 246 of the manual.  It's gotta be ATM 2.0.

Wrong!

My thanks to Ashok Aiyar (axa12@po.CWRU.Edu) for pointing out that, as
per the documentation in SYSINI.WRI, you must add:

FontChangeEnable=1

under the [NonWindowsApps] section in SYSTEM.INI in order to get this
to work.  (It's not added automatically because I'm using a Windows 3
800x600x256 driver.)

Thanks for the help!

See what happens when you don't read the documentation?!

-- 

michael regoli
regoli@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu
regoli@iubacs.BITNET
From: asgeir@cs.umd.edu (Asgeir Karl Olafsson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Why go to 3.1 if 2.0 works
Date: 13 Apr 92 16:32:21 GMT
Followup-To: comp.windows.ms
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742

In article <nmwjzwa.rcain@netcom.com> rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain) writes:
>
>Steve, sorry guy but I am composing this from a DOS window of WIN3.0 using
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^
>my comm software.  I only needed to tell my comm software that my modem was
>on com3 at irq7 and address 3e8.  I didn't have to do anything to windows.
>My comm software also knows this in a DOS window of OS/2 but that's not good
>enough.

Does Windows comm software work for you?  My modem was on com3 and
worked fine in a DOS window, but I needed to make some changes to
settings in Windows to make Windows comm programs work with com3.

Asgeir.





Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: Arshad Omari <arshad@bilby.cs.uwa.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Converting .au files to .wav files
Organization: Department of Computer Science, The University of Western
     Australia
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.0
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 01:20:17 GMT

I use SOUNDTOOL 2.5 which reads/writes/edits a variety of sound file
formats including *.wav.
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: hamilton@nwnexus.WA.COM (Dick Hamilton)
Subject: hDC Memory Viewer Win 3.1 update avail.
Summary: free update to FirstApps memory viewer
Keywords: Win 3.1, hDC FirstApps
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 00:00:04 GMT

An update to hDC FirstApps Memory Viewer 1.0 is now 
available for hDC FirstApps users.  On CompuServe, in
the WINAPA forum, library 6, as MEMV12.EXE.  Also 
available for download on hDC's Tech Support BBS @
206 869 2418 (2400 baud, N,8,1) as MEMV12.EXE in the
1stApps section.  It can also be ordered from hDC 
Customer Support for $2.50 for shipping & handling
at (206) 885 5550.  

Dick Hamilton
hDC Computer Corporation

Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.windows.ms.programmer
From: tomh@wes.on.ca (Tom Haapanen)
Subject: Re: Multiplatform devlopment packages (Windows, OS/2, UNIX)
Organization: Waterloo Engineering Software
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 12:31:42 GMT
Followup-To: comp.windows.ms.programmer

> Dean.Roth@mixcom.mixcom.com (Dean.Roth) writes:
>> I am looking for windowing, multiplatform development tools.
>> ... what is your opinion/experience with the package(s)? Thank you.

comptec89033@camins.camosun.bc.ca (Jeff Johnson) writes:
> I just finished a port of a DOS application to Mac and Windows with 
> XVT 2.0 and thought I'd add my two cents worth...

> XVT has very limited platform-dependent support for fonts; it's 
> difficult to say that you want the text for this window to be in 
> 12-point Times Roman, eg. Only 4 fonts are specified : small, normal, 
> large (all proportional fonts) and fixed.

The font support is much better in 3.0.  You can even specify some limited
font families and point sizes!  It's not sufficient, though, to handle things
like TrueType and ATM, either on Mac or Windows.

> XVT 3.0 (still in beta release, I think) will provide more of the 
> features currently lacking.

3.0 also changes the XVT program structure to a less brain-damaged form, adds
combo boxes and group boxes (about time!) and whole slew of other features.

Version 3.0 is now in "gamma" release; that means it's complete, but it still
has bugs in it.  They're expecting final release by the end of May for Windows
and Motif (end of June for Mac and PM, end of July for Open Look), but I'm
prepared to see another slip in the schedule.  :(

Followups directed to comp.windows.ms.programmer.

[ \tom haapanen    "i don't even know what street canada is on" -- al capone ]
[ tomh@wes.on.ca                   "trust the programmer" -- ansi c standard ]
[ waterloo engineering software      "to thine own self be true" -- polonius ]
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: lauch@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu (Chung Lau)
Subject: Using backmenus with windows 3.1
Organization: University of Engineering, College of Engineering
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 04:33:10 GMT

  Hi all!  One of the nice little feature of Windows 3.1 is that it 
would now use the icon you specified for your minimized Dos applications.
However, under backmenus, all Dos programs launched when iconized will
use the same generic MSDOS icon.  Is there any work around for this?

*---------------------------------------------------------------------*
Stephen Lau, Electrical Engineering, Univ. of Hawaii           
Internet: lauch@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu, Stephen_Lau@asylum.flex.com 
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.sys.mac.misc
From: stangel@sunc2.cs.uiuc.edu (Mike Stangel)
Subject: Re: PC is cheaper than MAC (Yeah, right.)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 02:42:06 GMT

I hope to God we never see a ResEdit for PCs.  Making hackers out
of thoughtless college Freshman has been nothing but a pain in the
neck for those trying to put secure software in public computing
sites.  I refer specifically to those who think it's funny to alter
the results of course software which is given to the students for
free.  I assure you my PC version of the software will be MUCH more
secure.

Mike 
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
| Mike Stangel -- stangel@uiuc.edu | "I can't kill the man I love."   |
| UIUC Student Chapter             | "Then kill the one you're with." |
| SigMicro of ACM                  |                     -Crow, mst3k |
`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: ebergman@isis.cs.du.edu (Eric Bergman-Terrell)
Subject: Re: SPEAKER.EXE WORKS... SOMETIMES
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 92 20:04:33 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.222828.29811@pbhyf.PacBell.COM> jcwasik@pbhyf.PacBell.COM (Joe Wasik) writes:
>I downloaded SPEAKER.EXE from CompuServe and found its twin brother
>SPEAK.EXE at anonymous ftp site bmgt-rt.umd.edu.  The latter also had
>a bunch of wav files.
>
>It works great when starting and stopping Windows.  I hear a bugle
>when Windows starts and Arnold's "I'll be back" when it's stopped.
>
>However, when I trigger other sound conditions, like exclamation,
>question mark, or asterisk, my pc goes mute.
>
>Anyone also noticed this?  Does it work for those of you with
>SoundBlaster cards?

I have a SoundBlaster Pro and the exclamation, asterisk, and question
marks don't always trigger a sound.

>
>-- 
>Joe Wasik, Pac*Bell, 2600 Camino Ramon, Rm 4E750V, San Ramon, CA (510)823-2422
>email: jcwasik@pbrain.PacBell.COM or [...]!pacbell!pbrain!jcwasik
>"If riding on an airplane is flying, then riding on a boat is swimming"
>	-- The Parachuters Handbook


Xref: sparky comp.windows.ms:12209 comp.windows.ms.programmer:5325
From: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Windows 3.1 drivers for Orchid Fahrenheit 1280 uploaded
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:40:12 GMT
Reply-To: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger)
Organization: Schlumberger Technologies, San Jose, CA.


I have uploaded the drivers for the Orchid Fahrenheit 1280 SVGA card to
wuarchive.wustl.edu. It is in the /pub directory currently as fwin3x.zip.
The administrator may move this at some time.

I will upload it to cica.cica.indiana.edu when it is back online.

These drivers support all the features of Windows 3.1 including the True Type
fonts, and mouse support in a DOS window. In addition, they have been
completely re-written. Instead of a separate driver for each mode, a single
driver handles all modes. In addition, there is a Windows utility to change
the video mode and re-start windows. The readme.1st file gives more info.
Orchid says that HiColor support is coming in the nest release.

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies       UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             Voice: (408)437-5254  FAX: (408)437-5246
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: lisbon@vpnet.chi.il.us (Gerry Swetsky)
Subject: Win3.1 speaker driver - Where?
Organization: Vpnet Public Access
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 05:37:54 GMT

My upgrade of Windows did not come with the driver for the internal
speaker.  I was told that I could download it off of Compuserve or a
BBS somewhere.

Has anyone seen this driver?  I am not on CIS and haven't found a BBS
with the driver yet.  Sure would like to get this thingie installed!

--
============================================================================
| Help stamp out stupid .signature files!           Gerry Swetsky  WB9EBO  |
|                 vpnet - Public access Unix and Usenet                    |
| Home (708)833-8122       vpnet (708)833-8126      lisbon@vpnet.chi.il.us |
============================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms