HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: BILLS WIN!!!!
Date: 23 Nov 92 05:09:35 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: UB

In article <1edv3aINNp6f@morrow.stanford.edu> GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold) writes:
>In article <BxvJnK.Kt3@acsu.buffalo.edu>,
>kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) writes:
>
>>In article <1ebb3eINNsth@morrow.stanford.edu> GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold) writes:
>>>In article <BxuJJ8.Mqp@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>,
>>>wlay@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Radio 90.1 FM WLAY Tarkington Hall) writes:
>>>>WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFF!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>Bills 26, Fish 20
>>>>
>>>>Just got done hearing a dolfan complain about the officiating... there were
>>>>calls BOTH ways close enough that I wouldn't want to have to make the call!
>>>>But, a minor reality check: IT'S OVER!! There is nothing you can do about
>>>>it!!
>>>
>>>There were bad calls both ways, but the worst had to be in the
>>>closing minutes of the game when Kelly clearly intentionally
>>>grounded the ball back on the Buffalo 2.  Considering that Buffalo
>
>>If I hear one more idiot say that, I'm going to scream. Look at the replay.
>>McKeller was right there. Kelly threw the ball to McKeller. McKeller did
>>not drop the ball. Incomplete pass. End of story. This was about the only
>>good call all night by those incompetant refs who are probably janitors at
>>Joe Robbie Stadium, but had to fill in for an absent officiating crew.
>
>Yes McKeller was standing there. But Kelly was hardly trying to pass
>the ball.  There is a difference in passing the ball while
>scrambling as compared to getting rid of the ball with hopes of
>avoiding a sack. And Kelly was clearly trying to avoid a sack by
>throwing the ball at any white jersey. Kelly was trying to
>just get rid of the ball, thus intentionally grounding the ball to
>avoid a sack.  It is a boarder line call though.
>Maybe it was a good call in your eyes, but I'm sure there are
>others who won't agree.  And just because these people don't agree
>with you, what the hells gives you the right to call them an idiot?
>Are you an expert at making intelligent analysis of this game? Or
>perhaps just another bias fan rooting for his team?
>
>                                                     Tony
>                                                  GO 49ERS!!!

I just call 'em like I see 'em.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dheyser@dazixco.ingr.com (Doak Heyser)
Subject: Eagle fan commits suicide (Re: 'Gang Green')
Organization: Dazixco
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:04:44 GMT


Joe Dakes writes:

>WOW!  You mean to tell me there are people on this newsgroup that are
>old enough to remember a time when Green Bay was formidable?  What is
>that Packer defense refered to now?  GANG GERITOL?

   Yep, I'm old enought to remember.  However, I can't remember when
the Eagles were ever NFL champs.  Check a few nursing homes.

   I do remember though when an Eagle fan fatally shot himself in the 
head outside the stadium after another Eagle home game loss.  His
suicide note said something like, "I can't take it anymore.  The 
Eagles will never be any good."  But I'm old and my mind is failing
so I could be wrong on a word or two.


>How's that for originality:-)?

   I give you a 3 out of a possible 10.  Real good for an Eagle fan.

- Doak Heyser
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: hunt@ssdslc12.asl.dl.nec.com (Frank Hunt)
Subject: Re: NFL odds question
Organization: NEC America, Inc Irving TX
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:12:36 GMT

In article <1ee38vINN8j7@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu> zaidioa@cs.rose-hulman.edu (Omar A. Zaidi) writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.134738.1@minnie.imd.nrc.ca> kmews@minnie.imd.nrc.ca writes:
>>I checked the paper for the odds today and found two games
>>listed as follows:
>>
>>N.Y. Giants v Philadelphia,off
>>L.A. Raiders v Denver,off
>>
>>What does the "off" mean? 
>>
>>KM
>>
>
>I think it means that the line is even.. i.e either team could win.
>
>correct me if I'm wrong tho
>
>

The off indication means that the Bookies in Vegas are waiting on some news
which could drastically effect the line. In the LA-Denver Game this is whether
Elway will play. In the Giants -vs- Philly game it could be Hostetler's 
condition or who the Eagles will start at QB. Either way, the line should be
available Thurday or Friday after the injury reports come out.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Re: Dolphins still suck (but are lucky)
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:47:11 GMT

nix@aslslc43.asl.dl.nec.com (David Nix) writes:
>> I smell fried fish, cajun style.
>
>Pardon me?!

You're pardoned.  I hope you realize that I am just a very worried
Dolfan.  Out here I don't get to see the Phins very often so it's
upsetting to watch two lackluster performances within one week.

I heard so much about the offense but it really wasn't going nowhere
yesterday.  There's a surprising lack of creativity from a team with
so many weapons (except, maybe, the draw play to Humphrey) and the
pattern seems to be that if Higgs can't get 5 yards on first down then
it's always a pass on 2nd and 3rd.

The defense had a couple of 1-2-3 stands that were really nice, but I
was really pissed at the poor tackling that allowed Lorenzo White to
tack an extra 5 on every carry.  The pass defense was okay, but the
pass rush was very sporadic.

The Fins were damn lucky to win the game. First, the offense went
1-2-3-punt with about 3 minutes remaining, which allowed the Oilers
another chance to score late; and then, the defnse gave a big run and
allowed the Oilers to get all the way to the 24.  Luckily, from then
on, all the breaks went the Fins' way.

If the Fins put it all together they can beat the Saints, no doubt
about that.  What I'm worried about is that they'll sputter again,
because the Saints are more likely to take advantage of mistakes
and half-opportunities than the Oilers did.


--Gidi	(worship mora)



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: carolan@owlnet.rice.edu (Bryan Carolan Dunne)
Subject: Re: AFC TEAMS STINK
Organization: Rice University
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:25:57 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.222206.25324@netcom.com>, mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:
|> In article <BxxCqn.5yt@acsu.buffalo.edu> v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:
|> 
|> >In article <1992Nov16.163218.19492@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>, lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes...
|> 
|> >>I happen to think that the Giants were no better than the Bills. 
|> >>I also think that the 49ers were the best of the three.
|> 
|> >If the 49'ers were the best in 1990 how come they lost to the Giants.
|> >The 49'ers lost because of Craig's fumble and Montana's injury.
|> >When is the last time the 49'ers beat an opponent by 48 points in
|> >the NFC Championship Game?
|> 
|> Oh, get real.  The fact that the Bills smeared the Raiders and then
|> lost to the Giants could just as easily be construed as evidence for
|> NFC superiority.  Besides, the only time the Niners really ring up
|> the numbers in the playoffs is when they get past the tough NFC foes
|> and get to cruise on the Fins or the Doncos.
|> 
|> The Bills' drubbing of conference opponents will *not* be evidence of
|> their superiority until they can equally drub an NFC team - ANY NFC team -
|> in the Big Dance.
|> 
|> >The Bills were the best team of 1990, they just didn't prove it in
|> >the Super Bowl.
|> 
|> The Bills were the best AFC team of 1990 (and 1991); what they proved
|> in the SBs was that they still can't hang with the best of the NFC.
|> 
|> >Bruce, a Bills fan.
|> 
|> And then some.
|> 
|> -- 
|> Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
|> SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
|> Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974

Despite the fact that the Bills haven't won the Super Bowl, they do have one thing on the NFC "gods" you worship, consistency over several years.
After XXV - Bills, kicked butt next year.  Giants, whats a football?
After XXVI - Bills, currently first in AFC.  Redskins, struggling for wildcard.
Some NFC teams, eh?
From: v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills vs. Dolphins
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:36:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


>Having set that up, let me say that the Monday Night game was the WORST
>OFFCIATED piece of garbage that ever passed for a football game.  Where did
>these guys get their training??  Under the coach who called the Immaculate
>Reception??  the Hail Mary??? 
> 
>The Bills kept getting generous spots all through the game. Especially in
>the last series.
>
What?  They started each series out where the kickoff/punt return ends.
The last seies started out at the 20, then the Bills move back 5 because
of penalty.  On that series, it most certainly was pass interference.
A defensive back doesn't pull the arms of a wide receiver down before
the ball is there, like Vincent did.

>The pass interference call against Miami??? Where???  Get glasses coaches,
>get glasses.
> 
>When Bills TE McKeller got into the fight with Miami defender Coleman, I
>though "Oh... the Bills blew that one."  Lo and behold, penalty against
>Coleman.  What sort of crap is this??

If you watch football, then you know that the second man is always the
one that gets caught.

>And my personal favorite, Kelly is about to be sacked by Coleman, he tosses
>the ball away.  I'm still waiting for that intentional grounding call.
>
I have seen a lot worst intentional grounding plays not called during
the season that should have been called against our opposing teams.
How about Marino throwing the ball away when Bruce Smith had him tied up.
Besides, the tight end was in the vicinity when the ball was thrown.

If you are not biased, then why not mention all the mistakes made.
Thurman Thomas was in the end zone at the end of the game.  The 
officials almost cost the Bills the game, by costing them 4 points.

>The Fins were no better.  Marino kept trying (and succeeding) into drawing
>the Bills defense offsides.  

Agreed.

Bruce, a Bills fan.
From: ee89rdc@brunel.ac.uk (Richard D Cullen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: L.A. Raiders!!!!!!!
Date: 23 Nov 92 15:40:20 GMT
Organization: Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]

Well here's a note to all you Bronco fans in the good ole U.S. of A from a fan
of the Silver and Black in England.

	L.A. RAIDERS 24  DENVER BRONCOS 0

A true result indicative of the fact that the Silver and Black are BACK and     aiming for the playoffs. This message is also an early warning for Chargers
fans - next week its you.
Thanks to the American Armed Forces Radio for covering the Raiders vs Broncos
game and allowing me to enjoy such a complete thrashing.
Take care all you fans in Raiderland

				Richard 'Raider Crazy' Cullen
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Glanville & Co. Re. Harley's
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 00:12:43 GMT

Jerry Glanville is just now being interviewed on ESPN
and he stated that he and all the Falcons will be wearing
leather jacktes and riding Harley Davidson's into the
field to start the game. It is called a new attitude by
Glanville. What a HAM. Okink! Okink! He seemed to be
in very good spirits. If the Niners lose this game, I
will trade-in my Harley for a Honda!! :-)
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
"I do not think that winning is the most important thing. 
I think winning is the only thing."    - Bill Veeck
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: blah@maas-neotek.arc.nasa.gov (TWF)
Subject: Re: Bills 26 Fins 20
Organization: NASA/ARC Information Sciences Division
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:13:21 GMT

In article <Adriene_Nazaretian.13.0@QM.cis.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!) writes:
>In article <BxuM87.6sw@acsu.buffalo.edu> kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) writes:
>>From: kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist)
>>Subject: Re: Bills 26 Fins 20
>>Date: 17 Nov 92 07:02:30 GMT
>>In article <BxuHJ7.4p8@acsu.buffalo.edu> carrato@acsu.buffalo.edu (Michael Carrato) writes:
>>>
>>>Subject says it all. Great game. Shit refs. Bills back in control...
>>                                  ^^^^^^^^^^
>>That should be SHIT REFS. Never have I seen a worsely biased officiating
>>job in my life. Well, the Bills proved that they can beat Miami even when
>>the Refs are against them. 
>>One more thing: this the a Professional football league, so shouldn't we
>>have Professional refs?
>>
>I've always said that Instant Replay was a fix for bad 
>officionating (<-spelling?) .  It is games like this that get owners and 
>teams fired up.  If the Bills lost, they'd be SCREAMIN for the IR to 
>return.    

I don't understand:  if you are saying that IR would have overruled
either of the touchdown calls, you are wrong.  There was no convincing
(read: beyond a reasonable doubt) camera angle for the Thomas
touchdown run; the touchdown catch (was it McKellars or Metzalaars, I
forget - no flames for spelling, please) also did not have a
conclusive camera angle.  (In fact, I'm pretty sure that was the
correct call, although I think that Thomas was in).  I think enough
calls went both ways ...  I don't think that you ought to diminish the
play of  the Bills defense by bringing up the officials.


Mark

Go Dallas
and A&M should be ranked #3.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chrisc@cae.wisc.edu (Chris Carey)
Subject: Re: It's only the Packers
Organization: College of Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin--Madison
Date: 18 Nov 92 12:01:10 CST

In article <98129@netnews.upenn.edu> sajja@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (Rajeev  Sajja) writes:
>In article <1992Nov17.203439.13782@bmw.mayo.edu> bergerson@mayo.edu writes:
>> stuff deleted...
>
>>as a Viking fan, I especially know that the Pack should never be taken lightly.
>>It is too bad that the Iggles and RanDULL Cunninham are too good to be bothered
>>playing a lowly team like the packers.  We all know that since their big win
>>over the cowboys they have been a lock in the Super Bowl.  :^)  :^)
>
>Hype goes on everywhere. Dont tell me that there is no super bowl
>talk in minnesota and the dallas camps.
>>
>> I think the Vikings should be more worried about their rematch with the 
>>Pack than the game with the super bowl bound Iggles.  The Iggles will be 
>>looking past the Vikes to the Super Bowl anyways.
>>
>yeah worry about the packers. Take it game at a time dudes, otherwise
>if you start thinking further ahead you can see your offense having 
>sleepless nights thinking about the eagles D.
>Get an offense before you come out and talk about beating a good offensive
>team. I am not saying that the eagles have a great offense, but they sure
>do have a better one that the vikes at this point. had it not been
>for the fact that the vikes D scoring TD's think where you would be in the
>division. Hey, what a great divisionthat is NFC Central. I am impressed.
>You are getting some competition from other teams in that division for the
>division title. Hey, but dennis green has done a heck of
>a job with the vikes down there.
d reason to be having a bad season.  However it isn't an excuse and a reason to
say, "well he's the fourth best QB in the league, he's just not playing like it
because he's hurt".  Elway, Marino, Moon, Kelly, there's four playing better
right there.  (not to mention Brett Favre).
>
>-Rajeev[A Scrambling Eagle]SajjA
From: v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills resurgence
Date: 20 Nov 92 04:56:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <98194@netnews.upenn.edu>, satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes...

>Hi,

Hello Satch :)

>I'm not  big follower of the Bills but I have noticed that after their loss
>to Miami earlier this year, they looked like they were on the skids.  The
>Miami loss and the Raider loss could probably be explained by the special
>defenses these teams used to stop Buffalo's offense but even when they played
>the Jets they looked pretty mediocre.   Then, out of nowhere, against Pitt
>they come back loaded with octane.  Ditto for their performance on the Monday
>night game.  Was there a reason for their resurgance??  Did the offense change
>any schemes?  Or was it all just a slump?

Personally, I would have to say, "Slump."  Now, before everyone jumps on me for
not being able to admit when my team is playing poorly, I will say this:  the
Bills were inside the Raiders' 20 ***5*** times.  They came away with 3 points.
This is poor execution on a minor scale.  Ditto for the Miami game.  The Bills
racked up 323 yards on offense Monday Night; they gained ***400*** yards in
the earlier loss at Rich Stadium.  The whole game was 4 INTs by Jim Kelly.

The offense isn't having that many problems, really.  It's just minor 
adjustments.  I still felt they should have scored many more points against the
Steelers (6 looong drives, 4 TDs).  Same with the 'Fins.  Call me jaded as a
Bills fan for looking hard at 28 and 26 points---but that's just the way I see
it...

>satish nair
>go giants

					---Chet Zeshonski
From: jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: TODAY'S FINALS
Date: 16 Nov 92 04:47:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: serval.1992Nov16.044753.16051
Distribution: usa
Organization: Washington State University
Originator: jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu


PHI 24   GB 27    F

PHO 17   ATL 20   F

WAS 16   KC 35    F

HOU 17   MIN 13   F  :-(

CIN 14   NYJ 17   F

SD 14    CLE 13   F

NE 37    IND 34   F/OT

DET 14   PIT 17   F

NO 20    SF 21    F

SEA 3    LARd 20  F

LARm 27  DAL 23   F

CHI 17   TB 20    F

NYG 13   DEN 27   F


Jim
Go Vikings, Northstars, Cougars!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jerryb@mail.boi.hp.com (Jerry Bidondo)
Subject: Re: Aikman-He's no Elway
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 20:18:18 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard / Boise, Idaho
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

>i think you're being a little too hard on aikman.  he got the team within
>striking distance, and just wasn't able to pull the trigger on the last two
>passes ... this time.  i agree he still has to prove himself a bit in these
>situations, but one time does not a comeback qb make.

It's not that I'm trying to be hard on Aikman.  Maybe it was the whole team
effort that was lacking--they almost seemed to be in slow motion most of the
day--except for Kmart--he looked great on the punt return.  But as far as
Aikman goes, I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed his casual manner
at the end of a half or the end of the game.  He tends to take his time--there
seems to be a lack of urgency in him.  That is the point I guess I was trying
to make.  I honestly believe that Troy has the tools to be one of the great
QB's of all time, and the teammates to help him get there. 

>aikman is still young, and has a chance to develop this.  though hopefully,
>he won't have to invoke it as many times as elway has.

I do agree with you here, I'd just as soon the cowboys jump out to a 30
point lead and then not have to worry about it--but there's a thing called
reality and "any given sunday"  (Blech!!!)


----------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Bidondo              | 11413 Chinden Blvd   | GO GETUM   |
Tech Info Services         | Boise, ID 83714-1023 | COWBOYS!!! |
HP Disk Memory Div.        | (208) 323-4483       |            |
----------------------------------------------------------------
From: v067ftek@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (TIMOTHY M. MCCARTHY)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: THE BET II (the vote) 11/21/92
Date: 21 Nov 92 22:26:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

I'm still not sure if you guys got my bet last week, but as for
the vote to allow the LOSERS back.

		YES				  NO
	       -----		      		 ----
1	v067ftek@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu 


______________________________________________________________
TOTAL		1				   0
If I didn't get my bet registered, [delete] me and make up your minds.
Lets not drag this thing out.
Either they're in or they're out!
T Mac
BILLS 4 VICTORIES FROM A 5-PEAT!!
From: tes0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (THOMAS EDWIN SCHMIDLIN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Koontz Computer Predictions Week 12
Date: 19 Nov 92 18:03:58 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1313@fozzy.UUCP>, ckoontz@aud.alcatel.com writes:
>The final tally on last week was 6-7-1 against the spread.  Not that
>bad for a crazy week in the NFL.  The point spreads generated by my
>algorithm seem to have gone down some this week.  There may be some
>gradual decline which occurs through the course of the season that
>needs to be tuned.  Here are my prognostications for this weekend:

I think you really need to find yourself a new algorithm.  Look at these games
(Games deleted throughout)
>
>Atlanta        21
>Buffalo        52

Maybe the right winner, but by 31?  I don't think so Tim.

>Green Bay      27
>Chicago        10

Maybe the other way around

>Indianapolis   24
>Pittsburgh     20

No way.  STEELERS 27 colts 7

>Dallas         24
>Phoenix        31

Funny.  Unrealistic, but funny.

>San Francisco  21
>LA Rams        26

Switch the scores

>NY Jets        13
>New England    27

Not a chance.  jets by 10.

>Kansas City    17
>Seattle         6

Give the chiefs 4 more points, and take 3 from the seahawks

>Comments welcome (and guaranteed I am sure)
>
>Carl
>ckoontz@rdxsun40.aud.alcatel.com
>
-- 


Tom Schmidlin       DEEP THOUGHTS: By Jack Handey - I wish a robot would
TES0@LEHIGH.EDU         get elected president.  That way, when he came
215-758-0875            to town, we could all take a shot at him and not
                        feel too bad.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: Re: SUPER BOWL TALK w/ a twist
Originator: delarocq@c00085-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:11:05 GMT




  N.O. doesn't have enough offense to do anything...
  Kansas City is a legit Super Bowl team!!!!! :) :)
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
1988,1989,1990,1991 AFC East Division Champions
1991,1992 AFC Conference Champions

Hungry for some fish.. Monday Night Football, November 16, 1992..

If you are a Buffalo Bills fan, email me at delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu
so we can talk all about the games, insight, etc.
If you are a Packers fan, let me know. I am interested in any news
out of Green Bay...
A PROUD MEMBER OF THE BILLS COALITION TAKING THE BET II.
From: v075p7mg@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Jonathan G Keller)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: dallas bandwagon
Date: 17 Nov 92 17:58:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Dear Cowboy fans:

   I am thoroughly embarrassed.  Here I jump of Da' Bills bandwagon,

jump on the Cowboy bandwagon, and we lose to the lowly Rams. Need I

remind you the Bills already beat the Rams badly.  Please win big

next week, or I will have to jump off your bandwagon.  I hear San Fran

is doing pretty well......



				confused

			JON (HELEN) KELLER 
From: privat@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Jim Privat)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:33:38 GMT
Subject: Delpino??
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro


Any Ram fans out there know when/if Robert Delpino will be
coming off IR and playing again?

Thanks,

Jim Privat
jimp@hpwss401.mayfield.hp.com