From: yangze@acf3.nyu.edu (Ze Yang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.china,soc.culture.tamil,soc.culture.indian.telugu
Subject: Re: Indo-china issues, Sum lien
Date: 8 Jan 93 16:08:09 GMT
Organization: New York University

fafat@usc.edu (Vijay Fafat) writes:


>Mr Dim Sum Lien writes:
>>On Chinese net we never see article like one which come from Deb Chatterjee,
>>Samit Banerjee, Mustafa Ibrahim, Ed Crick, Deepak Bose, and Vijay Fafat.
>>Mr. Banerjee and Mr. Fafat do very embarassing thing.  They bring shame
>>to University of Southern California.  I am also student at University of
>>Southern California.  I am ashmed when they insult other student.  It makes
>>University of Southern California look very bad to student at other 
>>university.  But I think I know why these people always sad bad word to
>>each other.  I think it is the religion in India that teach people to
>>be angry to one other.


>	So Dim Lien, you've taken resort to the net after you could'nt
>	convince me about your views on Communism and Vietnam war, eh?
>	Given your Tibetan-Nepali origins, I cannot understand your facist 
>	views about Government control and Indo-China dispute. There is also
>	no way you can justify the communist rule in China to me and hence
>	the heated discussions we've had in the past. However, that,
>	in no way, gives you a right to start vilifying Dr. Bannerjee and me
>	on the net without an issue-based argument. Samit had already told
>	you the details about the '62 war. You still insist on your
>	fanatic views about hegemonistic invasion of Tibet by China. The
>	border dispute between India and China is a much deeper issue, which
>	unfortunately, you do not understand.

Mr. Fatfat, How do you know the story you know is the true one, you see, 
that is the problem, everyone insists that he knows the truth. 
It's not strange at all that you cannot understand Dim, Indians could not
understand with each other, that's why their country divided into
3 countries, and they are still fighting with each other even inside
these 3 countries, how can we expect you to understand us?
As for any issue related to China, I wish you can respect the laws,
don't promote a revelution inside the teritory of China, we don't like
that. 

>>Indian have hindu and muslim who always fight and kill one other.  No find
>>peace.  Cannot have peace in hindu and muslim if they must always fight one
>>other.  In China we have Buddhism teach us to be peaceful and respect one
>>other.  We not use so much angry word against other Chinese.  Buddhism teach

>	O sure. Tell me the Tiannanmen story. And Gulags. And Mao. You
>	do not understand a word of what Buddha said, just as the Muslims 
>	don't understand a whit of what Quran is about, hanging on to
>	the edicts and fatwas by God-damned Mullahs and Hindus get duped
>	by the shankaracharyas and Godmen.

TAM incident and CR (what the hell is Gulags?) are different from those 
religious wars, these
happened in a rapid changing society, when a complex system is facing
something new, we expect violent comflicts inside the system, it's
understandable for me.
The differnce is that China is changing, it's moving forward.

>>
>>Buddha must leave India because he teach respect and peace.  Indian not
>>listen to teaching and make Buddha leave.  If you not want peace you fight
>>forever on net and in India.  Indian student should learn Buddhism.  Make
>>them fight less and work more in laboratory.

>>Dim Soon E. Lien


>	It does not matter whether one learns Buddhism or Jainism or 
>	Mustafaism, as long as you don't know how to interpret it from
>	a broader, catholic perspective, you're not about to have peace 
>	anywhere. To say that China is peaceful is just as laughable as saying
>	that the Islamic countries practise selfless brotherhood.

>	FFT

Send these words to the religious war in your country.

Ze Yang
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian