HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 27 Aug 1992 20:49:00 GMT
From:         "Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921@MCIMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Time Server?
X-To:         IBM TCPIP List <IBMTCP-L@pucc.princeton.edu>

Valdis said:

>You could always buy your *own* radio clock - a good one that will chime
>millisecond accuracy  is probably  a lot  less than  you think  (I think
>somebody built  a fully functional  stratum-1 clock that listens  to CHU
>(the Canadian radio signal) for under $200 or so.

>See /pub/ntp/doc/clocks.txt on louie.udel.edu  for details - it contains
>a list of most of the currently marketed radio clocks.

I got the clocks.txt file and read through it.  Seemed like something we could
do.  So I called my buddies over in the engineering side of our corporate
internet.  Their reply was, "We've already done that.  The Heath radio is on
___.___.___.___, give SETCLOCK at try".  I did and it worked, nat.

So a long run around the road.  Some of those engineers must be from New
England.  I got to ask a question just right, or they don't hear me...

Thanks for your help.  Now I bet I should look for a SETCLOCK for VM/TCP and
MVS/TCP and set the mainframes off of the Cyber :-}


Robert Moskowitz
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: State University of New York at Buffalo
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 16:50:01 EDT
From:         "Steven P. Roder" <TKSSTEVE@UBVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Blocking Telnet by IP address/Name

Does anyone have a mod to telnet that allows one to selectively block
outgoing sessions.  For example, I want to block TELNET 128.205.3.3 (and
it's corressponding name), but allow FTP access to 128.205.3.3.

Thanks,

Steve Roder
(tkssteve@ubvm.bitnet | tkssteve@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu | (716)636-3564
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
address: PO Bx 140125, Brooklyn, NY 11214-0002, USA
Phone: 1-718-946-6148
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 14:48:00 EDT
From:         FPEOC@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU
Subject:      Lpr and binary files

I recently got the  ptf to support binary option for  lpr (vm). With this
came along  a mess of  other stuff.  I all this  required if I  just want
to print to a unix system in binary? can I just  'slide' in the
'lpr moodule' file?

Frank P. Esposito
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 09:31:31 PDT
From:         eric_douglas@CSUFRESNO.EDU
Subject:      Re: Incorrect mail address (fwd)
X-To:         IBMTCP-L@pucc.princeton.edu

Forwarded message:
> From ericd Wed Sep  2 09:16:24 1992
> From: eric_douglas
> Received-Date: Wed, 2 Sep 92 09:16:22 PDT
> Message-Id: <9209021616.AA28007@gaudi.csufresno.edu>
> Subject: Re: Incorrect mail address
> To: daemon
> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 92 9:16:20 PDT
> In-Reply-To: <9209011538.AA18253@gaudi.csufresno.edu> from
 "daemon@csufresno.edu" at Sep 2, 92 08:38:06 am
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
>
> >
> > Presumably this distribution was to Professor Robert Judd, a subscriber
> > to our Listserv list since March 1992.  Is he no longer a user in your
> > system, or has his ID changed?  BTW, your error messages would be more
> > useful if you included the userID and nodename of the original message.
> >
> > Karl Signell
>
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ETHMUS-L
> >  <ETHMUS-L%UMDD.BitNet@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU>
>
>
> As you can see, your mailer does not expand your mailing list to user
> names in the header. Thus, it would be impossible for our autoreply
> script to lookup Professor Judd's new address.
>
> Professor Robert Judd's new email address is:
>
>      robert_judd@csufresno.edu
>
> If you could please change his address in your mailing list, it would
> be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Eric W. Douglas
>
> * | Eric W. Douglas                                      +1 209 278 3923 | *
> * | CalState Fresno Computer Services         eric_douglas@csufresno.edu | *
> * |                "if q -> p, and not p, then not q. NOT!"              | *
>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 11:22:17 EST
Comments:     <Parser> W: Field "Resent-To:/To:" duplicated. Last occurrence
              was retained.
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was NETNEWS@OCC
From:         Guy Nash <GPNASH@OCC.BITNET>
Subject:      DOS, OS/2 and/or MAC versions of GOPHER client
X-To:         Netnews Server <NETNEWS@OCC.BITNET>

Does anyone know where I can find public domain versions of the Gopher
client program?

I really interested in clients that run in DOS, OS/2 2.0 and MAC environments.
and somewhat interested in clients that run under the SUN OS.




Thanks...

Guy Nash              +1 313 540-1574   GPNASH@OCC
Systems Programmer
Oakland Community College
Bloomfield Hills, Mi, USA 48304
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 09:29:41 CDT
From:         Rick Troth <TROTH@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
Subject:      now THAT's more like it!

        WLFS ... yes,  it  *does*  do NFS.   (not everyone knows this)

        I started looking at it a couple of days ago.   VMNFS is nice,
but CMS directories are flat.   This thing enhances CMS filesystem
semantics and puts sub-directories onto what looks  (with DITTO)  like
otherwise normal CMS minidisks.   Of course,  you can tell it to *not*
do this for  "real"  CMS minidisks.    I  AM  HAPPY.

        Now all we need is a CMS NFS client.

        One thing it *doesn't* do that I wish it would,  is read the
TCPIP DATA file to know the VMID of the TCP/IP service VM.

Rick Troth <TROTH@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>, Rice University, I/S VM Systems Support
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 12:12:12 PDT
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was NETNEWS@UVVM.UVIC.CA
From:         Melvin Klassen <KLASSEN@UVVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: how to establish my own Internet address?

Artyem M.Beljaev <ABEL@ESOC1> writes:
!                      ESOC1 = European Space Operations Center of ESA
>Anybody answer me please, how can i establish my own Internet address ?
>Or tell me, address for contact ?

You could ask the local people how they got connected, i.e.,
-----------
Whois: european space
European Space Operations Center (NET-ESANET-IP)
   Robert Bosch Strasse 5
   6100 Darmstadt
   GERMANY

   Netname: ESA
   Netnumber: 131.176.0.0

   Coordinator:
      Williams, David  (DW195)  ESC1728@ESOC.BITNET
      +49 6151886257

   Domain System inverse mapping provided by:

   BCSERVER.ESTEC.ESA.NL        131.176.23.15
     ESTGTW.ESTEC.ESA.NL        131.176.23.22

   Record last updated on 03-Apr-92.

   There are 3 known hosts:

   BCSERVER.ESTEC.ESA.NL        131.176.23.15
     ESTCSG.ESTEC.ESA.NL        131.176.23.19
     ESTGTW.ESTEC.ESA.NL        131.176.23.22
> exit
>
> nslookup
> set type=soa
> esa.nl.

esa.nl  origin = bcserver.estec.esa.nl
        mail addr = postmaster.bcserver.estec.esa.nl
> exit
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Organization: U.S. Meat Animal Research Center
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 1 Sep 1992 15:57:11 CDT
From:         BRADLEY@MARCVM.MARC.USDA.GOV
X-To:         IBMTCP-L%PUCC.BITNET@UNLVM.UNL.EDU

   Forgive me if this is a FAQ as I have not subscribed to this list for
a while.
   I thought that the Cornell FTP mods provided FTP server support for
the SFS.  I downloaded the mods but the documentation does not mention
SFS.
   Are there any mods to fix this brain dead server? ;-)  Even the stuff
to access the 191 disk has me confused!  Most of our users are on the
SFS now.  I'm having them log onto VM and then FTP back to their micro.
Is this the best way?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4beta PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 347
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 18:41:21 CDT
From:         Cleve Graves <cvg@DBAIX.OC.COM>
Subject:      Re: Rfc number
X-To:         IBMTCP-L@pucc.Princeton.EDU
              "FPEOC@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu" at Sep 2, 92 07:17:00 pm

Me too!

According to FPEOC@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
>
>Anybody know   the rfc number for lpr/lpd?
>
>Frank P. Esposito
>


--
Thanks,                                 internet-mail id cvg@oc.com
Cleve Graves
Technical Marketing
OpenConnect Systems, Inc.
2033 Chennault Dr.

Carrollton, Texas 75006  (Dallas)      (214) 308-0416   FAX (214) 490-4052
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 20:31:25 EDT
Reply-To:     Doug Nelson <NELSON@msu.edu>
From:         Doug Nelson <08071TCP@MSU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Broadcast question
X-To:         "Larry D. Smith" <76247.1425@COMPUSERVE.COM>
X-cc:         IBMTCP-L <IBMTCP-L@pucc.PRINCETON.EDU>
              2 Sep 1992 17:52:42 EDT from <76247.1425@COMPUSERVE.COM>

Larry Smith asks:
>Would anyone be so kind as to answer the following question.  Givin the
>following (Class-C network number) IP addresses, SubNet mask and my
>interpretation of the resulting "actual network and host address" should I
>interprete a host address of all 1's as a valid broadcast for the resulting
>net and subnet?
>
> Case 1:
>
> IP address   = 192.214. 96.251    11000000.11010110.01100000.11111011
> Subnet Mask  = 255.255.255.252    11111111.11111111.11111111.11111100
> Net address  = 192.214. 96.248    11000000.11010110.01100000.11111000
> Host address =            .  3                              .      11
>
> Case 2:
>
> IP address   = 192.214. 96.250    11000000.11010110.01100000.11111010
> Subnet Mask  = 255.255.255.252    11111111.11111111.11111111.11111100
> Net address  = 192.214. 96.248    11000000.11010110.01100000.11111000
> Host address =            .  2                              .      10
>
> Case 3:
>
> IP address   = 192.214. 96.249    11000000.11010110.01100000.11111001
> Subnet Mask  = 255.255.255.252    11111111.11111111.11111111.11111100
> Net address  = 192.214. 96.248    11000000.11010110.01100000.11111000
> Host address =            .  1                              .      01
>
> Case 4:
>
> IP address   = 192.214. 96.248    11000000.11010110.01100000.11111000
> Subnet Mask  = 255.255.255.252    11111111.11111111.11111111.11111100
> Net address  = 192.214. 96.248    11000000.11010110.01100000.11111000
> Host address =            .  0                              .      00
>
>At this time I'm assuming that case 3 and 4 are valid host addresses and that
>case 4 which results in a host address of zero should not be used and that
>case 1 is a host address of all 1's and should not be considered a valid host
>address since it would produce a broadcast to all valid hosts in the
>192.214.96.248 subnet.
>
>Does any of this make sense, and am I right or wrong?

Except for saying "case 3 and 4" when I think you intended to say
"case 2 and 3", you've got it right.

Doug Nelson                     nelson@msu.edu
Michigan State University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 11:42:00 GMT
From:         "Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921@MCIMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: DOS packet drivers, NDIS and Token-Ring
X-To:         IBM TCPIP List <IBMTCP-L@pucc.princeton.edu>

Larry Backman said:

>No no no; convert Archie et. al. to someone's OS/2 sockets interface;
>it will be an easier port for you, you can do niftier things like use
>threads, and in general, work with the zen of the protocol stack within
>the OS as opposed to in spite of it.

Kudos to a vendor that has done that.  I wish that I had a direct internet
connection so I could use the ARCHIE that is supplied with PCTCP for OS/2.

As I get more experience with what I need to do, and I find or create more
services, I will be wanting more of this 'stuff'.  Quite adictive...


Robert Moskowitz
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Organization: K.U.Leuven - Academic Computing Center
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 11:47:16 +02
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was NETNEWS@CC1.KULEUVEN.AC.BE
From:         VAN UYTVEN HERMAN <SYSTHVU@CC1.KULEUVEN.AC.BE>
Subject:      TCPIP and RXSOCKET questions

Hello,

I have two questions about TCPIP and (RX)SOCKET(s) on VM :

1) Will it ever be possible for an (RX)SOCKET server to xautolog
   another virtual machine and 'fork' an incoming client connection
   to that other virtual machine ?

2) Is it possible for an (RX)SOCKET server to pass data to another
   virtual machine via IUCV or VMCF ?

Thanks,

-Herman-
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
address: PO Bx 140125, Brooklyn, NY 11214-0002, USA
Phone: 1-718-946-6148
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 19:17:00 EDT
From:         FPEOC@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU
Subject:      Rfc number
X-cc:         Frank P Esposito <FPEOC@CUVMB.BITNET>

Anybody know   the rfc number for lpr/lpd?

Frank P. Esposito
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Acknowledge-To: <SPOST@NASAGISS>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 25 Aug 1992 14:11:31 EDT
From:         "The Postman Always ..." <SPOST@NASAGISS.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: CMS Gophers, Rice v. Vienna ?
              24 Aug 1992 23:25:42 BST from <SY07@I1.PH.GLA.AC.UK>

On Mon, 24 Aug 1992 23:25:42 BST SY07 at GWIA Alan J.Flavell said:
>Vienna Gopher was written to interwork with Ken Hornstein's REXTCPIP
>and Version 1 FAL.  In that sense it isn't in competition with
>the Troth/Rice product, that uses RXSOCKET and can only work with
>V2.

Where can one obtain this Vienna Gopher?  We are currently stuck
with Version 1 of FAL, and depend on Ken Hornstein's REXTCPIP
exclusively.  (Besides, I'd like to see someone else's code using
REXTCPIP, for a change ;->)  Thanks .. in advance .. Ken

Ken Bell (SYKLB@NASAGISS * SYKLB@NASAGISS.GISS.NASA.GOV * 212-678-5545)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
address: PO Bx 140125, Brooklyn, NY 11214-0002, USA
Phone: 1-718-946-6148
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 14:35:00 EDT
From:         FPEOC@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU
Subject:      Re: Namesrv and SQL; Mubashir Farooqi <MUBASHIR@IBRDVM1.BITNET>

I am currently  running sql/ds and namesrv too and  have the same problem
when our  sql system  is stoped  for backups. Sometimes  I wonder  if the
folks who wrote this stuff are in the  real world. What I have done is to
code the  exit exec  that runs  in namesrv  to check  is the  database is
logon. If not, the exit fails and the code never starts up, thus no dump.

Frank P. Esposito
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 1 Sep 1992 20:51:00 GMT
From:         "Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921@MCIMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: VM as a PcMail Server?
X-To:         IBM TCPIP List <IBMTCP-L@pucc.princeton.edu>

Melvin Klassen replied:

>>Is there any software available to make a VM system a PcMail Server (rfc
>1056).
>>

>This sounds like you want a "POP" server.

Nope, I want PcMail.  POP is RFC 1081 and is an interactive mail system.  The
mail is brought down to the client as requested to view.  PcMail has a batch
function that allows the mass movement of mail.  This is specifically designed
for the occationally connected device, like a notebook.

But I am also interested in POP.  I would like to know if it would allow me to
access my PROFS (OV/VM) mail without going the 3270 route.

>Here's the index of the related IBMTCP-L archived articles.

I am requesting the stuff, and I am also doing a search on PcMail.


THANKS!!!!

Robert Moskowitz
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
From: gah@hood.hood.caltech.edu (Glen Herrmannsfeldt)
Subject: Re: Time Server?
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 21:02:55 GMT

Where in the internet is a machine that one would use
as a time standard.  I found out that of about 15 machines
here, the variation of clocks was about 20 minutes, highest
to lowest.

We had some discussion about setting them using NTP, and
thought about where to find a standard.

I tried the NIST primary nameserver, but we decided it
was at least a few minutes off.

Should someone in NIST have a machine with a nice accurate clock?


Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 23:37:01 EDT
From:         Bruce Crabill <BRUCE@UMDD.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Rfc number

>>Anybody know   the rfc number for lpr/lpd?
>
>RFC-1179
>Line Printer Daemon Protocol
>Network Printing Working Group
>L. McLaughlin III, Editor
>The Wollongong Group
>August 1990

Please be aware that there is a fair amount of controversy about this RFC.
The Network Printing Working Group of the IETF is considering a rewrite of
this to bring it closer to reality.  As RFC 1179 stands now, it does not
truely reflect how LPR/LPD works on a BSD platform, but rather includes
a few "extensions" that can cause interoperablility problems with a real
BSD version.  This RFC can be used to get a general feel of the LPR/LPD
protocol, but please don't treat it as the "standard" that all LPR/LPD
implementations are explected to meet.

                                       Bruce
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 15:48:55 EDT
From:         "Larry D. Smith" <76247.1425@COMPUSERVE.COM>
Subject:      Re: Broadcast question

Thanks for the reply Dan and Dave, I have Comer's books (both revised
versions) but "just wanted to play it safe" by asking a large crowd of people.


The reason we chose the 252 mask is that it allowed us to use a single class-c
address for interconnecting all of the serial links between our routers and
not eat up the other class-c's that have been assigned to us, and each subnet
only has two host to support (both ends of the serial link). The 63 subnets it
allowed will suffice for "backbone" structure of our network. At client sites
we may not subnet at all, but that is still up for debate. We have close to
500 locations that are being planned for interconnection and I have to admit
that planning an inter-connected TCP/IP Network is a real pain-in-the-a##!
What with all the rules and what not with trying to provide redundant and
alternate links it has really been a challenge.

Thanks, Larry

BTW, we also ran through the excercise of IP being translated (via mask) and
having the resulting subnet address be zero which is the same as the network
number. We deceided it was easier to explain this rather than not allowing
those combinations to be used.

But that brings up a good question, what does everone think about allowing
subnet addresses of zero to be the same as network addresses?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 15:49:29 EDT
From:         "Larry D. Smith" <76247.1425@COMPUSERVE.COM>
Subject:      Route tables

This is a general questions regarding how folks are handling route tables on
workstations if you have more than one gateway or router to get you off of
your local segment.

  Network-A (167)                                            Network-B (168)

               +----Router-1------/
               |                 /---------Router_3----+
  Wkstn_A------+                                       |
               |                                       +------Wkstn_D
  Wkstn_B------+                                       |
               |                                       +------Wkstn_E
  Wkstn_C------+                                       |
               |                /----------Router_4----+
               +----Router-2---/

In this type of setup with redundant physical routers at both locations (which
is a requirement) my DEFAULT route statement in Wkstn_A,B,C are pointing to
Router_1 to resolve requests to other networks. This works fine and we have no
problems. But if Router_1 fails my workstations cannot get to network-b
because they don't know about Router-2.

If I understand correctly there are two ways to resolve this scenario:

 1. Add a static route statement in the workstations to point to
    the second router to resolve addresses for network-b
 2. Turn on RIP in routers and workstation to allow arping to
    locate other routers attached to your wire.

In this simple example its no problem to add static route tables, but as the
number of networks grow and when additional routers are added to segments it
seems that we would be creating an adminstrative nightmare.

Now for the REAL question:

By allowing RIP in the network (I'm referring to turning it on in the cisco
router) are we opening up additional problems that we not have thought about
yet? Here I'm talking abouts clients adding a second nic card to their machine
and turning on gateway functions, using incorrect net and subnet addresses
etc...

Are there any other alternatives? Currently our workstations are using IBM's
OS/2 TCP/IP,  FTP DOS TCP/IP, Apples TCP/IP, AIX TCP/IP, SUN TCP/IP, HP's
TCP/IP and Netware's TCP/IP.

Thanks in advance, Larry
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
From: oleg@watson.ibm.com (Oleg Vishnepolsky)
Subject: Re: TR Busmaster Server Adpt & TCP/IP 1.2
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 20:30:31 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.11 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: oleg@watson.ibm.com (Oleg Vishnepolsky)
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In  <92246.174418A6054OS2@HASARA11.BITNET>  <A6054OS2@HASARA11.BITNET> writes:
> Lines: 13
>
> Loading of Config.Sys goes normally, but as soon as I ping to a remote address
> I get the following error message:
>
> LT40009: An unrecoverable error occurred in the IBM Token-Ring Network 16/4
>          Busmaster Server Adapter NDIS device driver program.
>
> Anyone with a suggestion?

Do you have TCP/IP 1.2.1 upgrade ? Straight 1.2 would not work with a BusMaster on
OS/2 2.0 base.

Oleg Vishnepolsky
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: University at Albany Computing Services
X-Acknowledge-To: <BEC@ALBANY>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 22:17:47 EDT
From:         Ben Chi <BEC@ALBANY.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Rfc number
              2 Sep 1992 19:17:00 EDT from <FPEOC@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU>

On Wed, 2 Sep 1992 19:17:00 EDT <FPEOC@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU> said:
>Anybody know   the rfc number for lpr/lpd?

RFC-1179
Line Printer Daemon Protocol
Network Printing Working Group
L. McLaughlin III, Editor
The Wollongong Group
August 1990
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 20:13:05 MSK
From:         ABEL@ESOC1.BITNET

Hello !
Anybody answer me please, how can i  establish my own Internet address ?
Or tell me, address for contact ?
                                                     Artyem M.Beljaev
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU