HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: csf7m@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Carole Susan Fungaroli)
Subject: Re: For your inspection and reading pleasure
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:19:51 GMT

Well, um, I was the priest who rejected this, but it was a hard
decision and I may have goofed.  I thought the oracularity was
*really* funny, but it also made me kinda sick.  So I pondered
it for the rest of the day and came back to it.  Still I was
undecided.  So I called in a friend to read it and reply.  He
was as undecided as I was.  Finally, I nixed it, but then later
I thought about it again and kind of wished I hadn't.

So here's the question--should I have okayed it?  I'm thinking
it seems funnier now, and less disgusting.  I've always thought
it was great, it just made me want to barf.  Comments?

(This is sort of like the controversial barf scene in *Stand
by Me,* which I liked and was queased-out by at the same time.)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
From: ptaylor@airfarce.Canada.Sun.COM 
Subject: Re: What do ya'll think?
Reply-To: ptaylor@airfarce.Canada.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:35:36 GMT

In article 27747@usl.edu, Me () writes:
> Greetings.  I got this response from the Oracle and found it hilarious.
>However, it never made it to an Oraclarity (sp?) digest.  Did it slip past
>the system, or do I just have an off-beat sense of humor?  
> 

I think the latter.  Good sense of irony, tho'.

Give it a 3......................PKT
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
From: pjmorse@unix.amherst.edu (Polar Bear)
Subject: #522-03
Organization: Amherst College
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 06:43:23 GMT

#522-03 would have been a fantastic Oracle.... if only it hadn't been borrowed
from an old Dr. Demento tape. I don't remember the artist but the song was
"Fast Food."

--
Polar Bear                          i won't be a monkey in anyone's zoo
pjmorse@amherst.edu                 and i won't get fazed, whatever you do
pjmorse@unix.amherst.edu            "hit him again, he's crazy"
                                                   -ride
From: gowen@jade.tufts.edu (G. Lee Owen)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: For your inspection and reading pleasure
Date: 25 Jan 93 07:32:55 GMT
	<1jpbjkINNh5r@tamsun.tamu.edu> <C1E3JE.CE@cs.uiuc.edu>
	<1k01ktINNp64@tamsun.tamu.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: Tufts University - Medford, MA

> So, if there is no general vote, then when is the submission's score
> determined?  Where does the score come from?
	From we the readers.  The idea is that, after we read the
journal, we mail in our vote -- as is documented at the top of the,
say, journal, like such:

>To find out all about the Usenet Oracle, including how to participate,
>send mail to oracle@cs.indiana.edu with the word "help" in the subject
>line.
>
>Let us know what you like!  Send your ratings of these 10 Oracularities
>on an integer scale of 1 ("very poor") to 5 ("very good") with the
>volume number to oracle-vote@cs.indiana.edu (probably just reply to this
>message).  For example:
>    523
>    2 1 3 4 3   5 3 3 4 1     
>
>518  45 votes  6cd86 hj441 3afe3 15ge9 59n35 2ik50 23age 27eac 3cgc2 47bbc
>518  3.1 mean	2.9   2.0   3.1   3.6	2.9   2.6   3.8   3.5	3.0   3.4

	So, for journal #518, 45 people voted on the 10 entries.  and 
these are their scores (2.9, 2.0, 3.1 etc etc).

	The discussion which led to this was whether or not the
Priesthood discusses among themselves the individual entries _before_
they are placed in the journal.  (as another user pointed out, this is
not the case - Mr. Kinzler is judge, jury and hangman once a priest
submits).  This is entirely separate from the above vote, which is a
vote by _readers_ following the release of the journal, to tell Mr.
Kinzler and the priesthood what kind of a job their doing...

	OB GROVEL: and oh, what a good job they do....

;>

--
--Greg Owen
	gowen@forte.cs.tufts.edu, gowen@jade.tufts.edu
"C Spot. C Spot run. C Spot run without a core dump! Run, Spot, Run!"
From: phudl@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr S J Liddicott)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: For your inspection and reading pleasure
Date: 27 Jan 1993 13:06:06 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: emmental.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <SPACKMAN.93Jan26162810@disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de> stephen@acm.org writes:
>No; I was just really amazed when my staunchly anti-censorship,
>pro-priestly-judgment post was interpreted as the converse....

Ahh well, such misunderstandings are bound to occur in life.

                                                               And your
>"in real life" name is unusual in carrying an explicit gender marking.

Well....?
I don't get to choose that, but....?

-- 
*----------*-------------------------------------------------------------*
| Sam   Jam|"Never underestimate the importance of a cheap laugh"-       |
| Liddicott| phudl@csv.warwick.ac.uk                     Plucky Duck TTA |
*------------------------------------------------------------------------*
From: spackman@disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de (Stephen Spackman)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: For your inspection and reading pleasure
Date: 25 Jan 1993 10:24:26 GMT
Organization: DFKI Saarbruecken GmbH, D-W 6600 Saarbruecken
	<1jpbjkINNh5r@tamsun.tamu.edu>
	<SPACKMAN.93Jan23173307@disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de>
	<1juodvINNtb@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>
Reply-To: stephen@acm.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de
In-reply-to: phudl@csv.warwick.ac.uk's message of 24 Jan 1993 18:50:39 -0000

In article <1juodvINNtb@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk> phudl@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr S J Liddicott) writes:
|In article <SPACKMAN.93Jan23173307@disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de> stephen@acm.org writes:
|>Priesthood: I don't *want* you to decide not to show me this material,
|>not if it meets Oracular standards for everything but political
|>correctness. I don't *care* how many decisions it takes to make the cut
|>- the cut itself is wrong. After all, who's the best judge of my
|>stomach, me, you or society?
|>
|>Edit, yes, censor, no.
|
|TOSH!
|	   The priesthood post what they feel like posting.  Shall there be
|a select group of non-priesthood to monitor their monitoring?
|Of course not.
|
|	   What you can stomach has nothing to do with it.
|If you're so worried that they may not post something that you feel is
|good enough, then either take a break or be a priest.
|
|	   Perhaps people are getting a little to uptight about what they find
|"technically funny" and "technically well done" and what they really 
|enjoyed reading and what really made them laugh.

I'm afraid I absolutely don't understand your response here. The topic
of discussion was whether GOOD material should be omitted from the
digest in view of potentially objectionable content. I replied, no, not
if it is GOOD - just rot13 it (as is done on rec.humor.funny and
elsewhere). Then people can read it "at their own risk".

Now you come along and make as if I'm trying to set myself up as grand
censor of the universe?

As to what I can stomach: that's the POINT. What *I* can stomach is
nobody's business but mine; and what YOU can stomach is nobody's
business but yours. If an oracularity is a fine piece of work but makes
YOU feel queasy (even though you admit that you enjoyed it), why
shouldn't WE read it too? It fits the criteria - it's funny! - so post
it! As I say, it can always be rot13ed if you really feel that the world
at large can't take a joke.

(And remember, Mr. Liddicott: the best responses are written after
reading the question...).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
stephen p spackman                                       stephen@acm.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: phudl@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr S J Liddicott)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: For your inspection and reading pleasure
Date: 24 Jan 1993 18:50:39 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <SPACKMAN.93Jan23173307@disco-sol.dfki.uni-sb.de> stephen@acm.org writes:
>Priesthood: I don't *want* you to decide not to show me this material,
>not if it meets Oracular standards for everything but political
>correctness. I don't *care* how many decisions it takes to make the cut
>- the cut itself is wrong. After all, who's the best judge of my
>stomach, me, you or society?
>
>Edit, yes, censor, no.

TOSH!
	The priesthood post what they feel like posting.  Shall there be
a select group of non-priesthood to monitor their monitoring?
Of course not.

	What you can stomach has nothing to do with it.
If you're so worried that they may not post something that you feel is
good enough, then either take a break or be a priest.

	Perhaps people are getting a little to uptight about what they find
"technically funny" and "technically well done" and what they really 
enjoyed reading and what really made them laugh.
-- 
*----------*-------------------------------------------------------------*
| Sam   Jam|"Never underestimate the importance of a cheap laugh"-       |
| Liddicott| phudl@csv.warwick.ac.uk  | I WAS IN IDAHO | Plucky Duck TTA |
*--------------IF NOT 1 AND NOT 2 AND NOT 3 THEN 4-----------------------*
From: leitm@solb1.essex.ac.uk (Leith M F)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: The Oracle Works in mysterious ways
Date: 25 Jan 93 11:42:31 GMT
Reply-To: leitm@essex.ac.uk (Leith M F)
Organization: University of Essex, Colchester, UK

In article <1993Jan21.055334.25544@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann) writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.141424.523@hsh.com>, paul@hsh writes:
>>heck, they can't ALL be THAT lame. Can they?  ;-> 
>
>Yeah, I think they can.  Judging from the replies that I've gotten
>as a kind of mini-sampler of a Priest's traffic, I'd say there's
>quite a bit of sludge out there.
>
Agreed, there is quite a bit of sludge.  But on the other side of the
coin, I wonder how many worthy potential oracularities slip past ye
Priests' attentions?  I've had stuff that I contributed to published in the 
Oracularities one day, then had material which I rate more highly not get
published at all.  Oops, what have I don..  
[THUNDEROUS VOICE :] 
O MOST ARROGANT OF INCARNATIONS, YOU DARE CRITICISE THE PRIESTHOOD 
THUS BREAKING THE THIRD COMMANDMENT OF THE ORACLE? ON THY BELLY, WORM!!
REPEAT AFTER ME : THOU SHALT GROVEL
                  THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY ORACLE'S LISA
                  THOU SHALT NOT CRITISISE THE PRIESHOOD
                  THOU SHALT NOT COMPLAIN LAMELY ABOUT NOT HAVING
                       THY ANSWERS PUBLISHED EVERY TIME
                  THOU ..

OK! I give in! Sheesh, there's no justice in this world....
From: pjmorse@unix.amherst.edu (Polar Bear)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: #523-10
Date: 28 Jan 93 20:06:29 GMT
Organization: Amherst College
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]

With regard to the amps that turn up to 11: Upon seeing Spinal Tap, I thought
that amps that went to 11 was just a joke. But when I bought a practice amp,
which is truly tiny and quiet as practice amps should be, I found that in fact
the volume knob DID go to 11. The amp was made by ASI/Quantum, and is I think a
15-watt amp.

They exist. (Note of interest, perhaps to expand the database of the Oracle who
may have to ignore that which is cheap and insignificant...)

--
Polar Bear                          i won't be a monkey in anyone's zoo
pjmorse@amherst.edu                 and i won't get fazed, whatever you do
pjmorse@unix.amherst.edu            "hit him again, he's crazy"
                                                   -ride
From: nrp@csug3.cs.reading.ac.uk ("Independent direction socks" Neilski)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: The Oracle Works in mysterious ways
Date: 25 Jan 93 14:15:08 GMT
Reply-To: nrp@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk
Organization: University of Reading

Well, I decided (after a break of about a year) to start answering Oracular
questions again.  Lo and behold, one of my first six made it into a digest.
That's not too bad, is it?

-- neilski
now i'll have to see what the score was

-- 
 Marmite is Sex on Toast! |  _ __        _          |  "Hmmm.  Lime custard,"  
--------------------------| ' )  )      //     /    |   said Nijel.  "Do you   
  Is it a small plastic   |  /  / _  o // _   /_  o |   think we could have    
 orange from Basingstoke? | /  (_</_<_</_/_)_/ <_<_ |      some stairs?"
From: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: The Oracle Works in mysterious ways
Date: 21 Jan 93 05:53:34 GMT
Reply-To: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann)
Organization: University of Arizona

In article <1993Jan20.141424.523@hsh.com>, paul@hsh writes:
>heck, they can't ALL be THAT lame. Can they?  ;-> 

Yeah, I think they can.  Judging from the replies that I've gotten
as a kind of mini-sampler of a Priest's traffic, I'd say there's
quite a bit of sludge out there.

-- 
You're traveling through another dimension -- a dimension not only of sight and
sound but of mind. A journey into a wonderous land whose boundaries are that of
imagination.  That's a signpost up ahead: your next stop -- the Twilight Zone!
From: bouillon@gipsy1.cs.uni-sb.de (Peter G. Bouillon)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: The Oracle works in mysterious ways
Date: 26 Jan 1993 18:32:47 GMT
Organization: Computational Linguistics Dept., U Saarbruecken
NNTP-Posting-Host: gipsy1.cs.uni-sb.de
Summary: I wonder what's wrong with this Oracularity?
Keywords: obfuscation, lingo, research

In his post, Paul Havemann says on  20 Jan 93 19:14:24 GMT,
>  I, for one, would like to see more posts of the replies that you-all
>  made, that you think should have made the Oracularities -- heck, they
>  can't ALL be THAT lame. Can they?  ;->

So here's one reply I got that I found pretty good and that did not
show up in any Oracularities.  Lame?  Not the Oracle's style?  Hackneyed?  
Nasty?  Too demanding?  Just not good enough?


The Usenet Oracle has pondered your question deeply.
Your question was:

>  Oh electronic oracular service device,
>  oh machinal response generator,
>  oh theodic personal advisory computer,
>  please inform me as to the reason behind this factual information:
>  
>  Why is it that researchers take each other serious only
>  when they babble in a specialized lingo,
>  using mathematical and latinized expressions that
>  are forcefully difficult and optimized 
>  as to maximal incomprehensibility?

And in response, thus spake the Oracle:

} Oh humble seeker and speaker in verse,
} Oh question posing machination,
} Oh inquistive and enigmatic sphinx,
} I shall reveal the quarry thou huntst with the blinding light of Thoth:
} 
} The ages have passed down the ability to perplex,
} From father to son, an ancient art,
} Which you unobscuredly behold now so lucidly,
} Reversion to impressive displays of latinate
} Replaces the sinecure of verse in obfuscation of darkened concepts.

--
Peter G. Bouillon		bouillon@cs.uni-sb.de
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
From: loren@panix.com (Loren Finkelstein)
Subject: What happens after sending in an answer?
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 15:30:07 GMT

I bid you all Greetings.

I have only recently discovered the All-Wise, All-Knowing Oracle, and I
have a question.  I requested a question from the All-Powerful Oracle, and
one was given to me in a matter of minutes.  After expending a great deal
of mental energy on the problem I replied to the message (the next day). 
This happened about 1 minute ago.  I am just wondering, what happens now? 
Do I find out if my answer was used?  Do I find out if it wasn't?  Will
the Oracle automatically tell me anything at all?  Will it send me
another question, or do I have to request one?  Please, clue me in.

Thanks.

Loren Finkelstein
loren@panix.com

-- 
Loren Finkelstein			  Be a Leader
					  Be a Friend
LOREN@PANIX.COM				  Be of Service
LFINKELSTEIN@VAX.CLARKU.EDU		-Alpha Phi Omega-
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
From: stcmille@panix.com (Steve Miller)
Subject: Re: For your inspection and reading pleasure
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:41:46 GMT


Hmmmm.  Seemed to me that the problem with the cannibalistic post was
not that it was tasteless or "shocking."  Surely, there's plenty of
material here that's both (though much of it is not as funny).  The real
problem here was that the answer added nothing to the question in terms
of humor or ideas.  I think I would have approved it just because the
question made me laugh out loud ("Kentucky fried children...I want to
have children").  

The answer, I thought, detracted from the question because the Oracle
was presented as too squeamish.  Not creatively squeamish, either -
which might have been ok.

As for the arbitrariness of the process problem, I think this is fine.
The Oracle is an arbitrary and capricious deity and she can act in
whatever way pleases her. 

If we can't stomach jokes about cannibalism we may as well stop eating
each other all together!


-- 

__________________________________________________________
Steve Miller				stcmille@panix.com
		A Famous Rock Star!
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
From: asbestos@nwu.edu (Michael A. Atkinson)
Subject: Oracular Mechanics
Followup-To: rec.humor.oracle.d
Originator: mikea@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
Organization: Chaos
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:28:27 GMT

(Another priest said more-or-less the same thing, but I'm noticing that
some posters are still making this mistake)

Just to clarify: the Oracle's priesthood does not vote on what is to be
submitted.  One priest, and one priest only, views the Oracularity and
decides if it's to be published on r.h.o.  Kinzler, or his appointee when
he's in Barcelona :-), then decides from these which of them makes it into
the Digest.  It is my understanding that Steve rarely kills an Oracularity
that a priest has approved.

The voting is done by the readership as a whole, and the priests get
feedback by seeing how the Oracularities they approved were rated by the
readership. 

When in doubt, priests may use the aforementioned Ultra-Secret
Priest-Net<tm> to ask the opinions of other Priests.  Often, SOs have the
final say in whether a particular Oracularity is submitted :-).


You owe this Priest mail to oracle@moose.cs.indiana.edu, with the word
"help" in the subject line.

Mike Atkinson
Oracle Priest
-- 
Michael A. Atkinson    | "Macintoy" is Copyright (c)1992 by 
asbestos@nwu.edu       |                 Chaos Organization.
                         
            A Libertarian and an NRA member.
From: mshulman@genghis.borland.com (Michael Shulman)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: #521-08
Date: 21 Jan 93 19:18:00 GMT
Organization: Borland International

In article <1993Jan20.062439.3330@news.weeg.uiowa.edu> rahayden@news.weeg.uiowa.edu (R Andrew Hayden) writes:
>From: rahayden@news.weeg.uiowa.edu (R Andrew Hayden)
>Subject: #521-08
>Date: 20 Jan 93 06:24:39 GMT
>
>I just wanted to post this, #521-08 was a post that for some reason just
>seemed kool, like it had a certain artistic quality to it . . .
>
Yeah, but explain the part about Gennifer (sp?) Flowers...

-ms
From: davidr@cs.tamu.edu (David E Randolph)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: For your inspection and reading pleasure
Date: 28 Jan 1993 02:34:05 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University
NNTP-Posting-Host: solar.tamu.edu

In article <106865@netnews.upenn.edu> weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener) writes:
>I thought the tastelessness was quite tasteful, and hence should have
>been accepted.  It's at the level of certain camp songs, like "Great
>big gobs of greasy grimy gopher guts, mutilated monkey meat, itty bitty
>baby feet/French fried eyeballs boiled in a bowl of blood, oops I forgot
>my spoon....But I remembered a straw...."

Oh, boy, Matthew, am I ever glad you came along to defend my work!
Yessir, the baby back oracularity is sure going to gain public 
acceptance now!  Mm-mm-mm, I always aspired to have my writing compared
to a summer camp song like the "gopher guts" one, or the one that
goes "Nobody likes me everybody hates me guess I'll go eat worms..."
Well, I just can't think of an appropriate way to express my 
gratitude for your contributory support!  :->

--In truth, Thanks,
--David Randolph
From: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: For your inspection and reading pleasure
Date: 26 Jan 93 05:53:12 GMT
Reply-To: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann)
Organization: University of Arizona

In article <C1FDDn.B9B@panix.com>, stcmille@panix (Steve Miller) writes:
>If we can't stomach jokes about cannibalism we may as well stop eating
>each other all together!

Eew!  With a gammy leg?!

-- 
Caught an internal error--.brainrc restored
From: mcglk@cpac.washington.edu (Ken McGlothlen)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: Is something wrong here?
Date: 21 Jan 93 10:22:56
Organization: Dubious.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: yang.cpac.washington.edu
In-reply-to: mcgee@nic.csu.net's message of 20 Jan 93 16:33:05 GMT

Actually, I've decided that I've been in a dry spell for three months now.
Every once in a while, I get a good post, but it's usually weeks between them.
I know it's kinda discouraging, but hang in there.

				---The Stupendously Reverend Ken McGlothlen
				   Priest of the Oracle
				   mcglk@cpac.washington.edu
				   mcglk@cpac.bitnet
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
From: cheesey@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Daniel "Cheeseplant" Stephens)
Subject: Repeated questions...
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:04:49 GMT


     Why on earth do people do stupid things like mail the SAME [really awful]
question (or set of questions) to the oracle lots of times? If a question comes
up that you can't answer then you dont want to ask for another one just to get
the same question (or a derivative) and THEN to get the same question as you
got first time except this time with the mail header on (Which does however
include the sender *hmmm*) 

		       Yours, Somewhat annoyed, Daniel.
-- 
| /--\ -----\ Daniel Stephens           | Surrounded by a guiding light, ----\
| |    /--\ | cheesey@dcs.warwick.ac.uk | Protected from the cold of night,  |
| \--/ |--/ | csudk@csv.warwick.ac.uk   | For love, in its most honest form, |
\----- \    | (-8 aka. Cheeseplant 8-) -/ Has power enough to keep you warm. |
From: paulk@terapin.com (Paul Kienitz)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: priests
Date: 25 Jan 93 02:06:43 GMT
Organization: BBS

How come when I sent in 522-05 I was told that it was deficient and needed
work, and then I sent in a new version, and then the old version was put in the
digest??
From: paulk@terapin.com (Paul Kienitz)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
Subject: Re: priests
Date: 27 Jan 93 18:52:54 PST
Organization: BBS

>The Oracle moves in mysterious ways. :-)

You mean you concluded the new version was even worse?
Newsgroups: rec.humor.oracle.d
From: ejs16@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Eric Jaron Stieglitz)
Subject: Avoiding the same answerer
Reply-To: ejs16@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Eric Jaron Stieglitz)
Organization: Me, Myself, and I
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 05:33:41 GMT

Is there any way to avoid having the same person answer a resubmitted question
twice? I submitted a question a week ago, got back a short and unfunny answer
within five minutes, resubmitted it today, and received an answer very similar
to the previous one within five minutes (Both gave me the same suggestion, 
which completely avoided the question). Either the same guy answered both 
questions or some of the people who receive these questions don't enjoy putting
time into the answers. 

---
Eric Jaron Stieglitz   ejs16@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
School: (212) 853-6883 
Home:   (401) 421-7479