HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Subject: Re: Help: I can upload but not download!
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 07:47:54 GMT

borgen@stud.cs.uit.no (Boerge Noest) writes:
>
>E0 F1 M1 Q8 T V1 W1 X3 Y1 &P0 &T4     Version HA2.10 LIB:STD
>S00:008 S01=000 S02=043 S03=013 S04=010 S05=008 S06=002 S07=040 S08=004
>S09=006
>S10=007 S11=085 S12=050 S18=000 S25=005 S26=000 S38=000
>S41:001 S45=000 S47=004 S48:001 S49=000
>S50=000 S51:005 S52:002         S54=000 S55=000 S56=017 S57=019 S58:002
>S59:062
>S60=000 S61:000 S62=003 S63=001 S64=000 S65=000 S66:001 S67=000 S68=255
>S69=000
>S90=001 S91:001 S92:001 S93=008 S94:000 S95:002 S96:000 S97:001 S98=003
>S100=000 S101=000 S104=000 S105=001 S106:001 S107=020
>S110=255 S111:020 S112=001
          ^^^^^^^^
>S121=000 S130=002 S131:001
>S150=000 S151=004 S152=001 S153=001 S154=000 S155=000
>S160=010 S161=020 S162=002 S163=003 S164=007
>S183:000 S255=000
>
>
>The problem is that things used to work ok, and I can't remember to have done
>anything to mess this up.
>

Well, enabling Xmodem protocol support can cause trouble for Zmodem if
you're connecting to another Telebit modem.  Try setting S111=0 before
you make the phone call.

That's the only thing that looks unusual.  Make sure your computer can
handle RTS/CTS flow control.  That's what your S58 and S68 settings have
chosen for the modem.

-- 
:::::::::::::::::::  Greg Andrews  gerg@netcom.com  :::::::::::::::::::
ObGuindon:  "The way the economy works, if a man has ten carp
            and he gives four to the government, no matter how
            you slice it, he's still stuck with six carp."
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: kenb@dadd.ti.com (Ken Butler)
Subject: Re: Digicom Scout modem
Organization: Texas Instruments, Inc., Dallas, TX
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 14:08:58 GMT

Regarding "Digicom Scout modem", Mark Pearson writes:

Mark> I have noticed a couple of posts about the Digicom Scout Plus.
Mark> How do people rate it? I am looking to standardise our college on
Mark> a new modem with all the V & MNP trimmings and fax and it looks
Mark> good.

Mark> What software comes with it?  Why is it that only the internal
Mark> version has the 16550AFN chip?  I much prefer external modems on
Mark> PCs - you can see the lights and usre the COM port for something
Mark> else.

While we're on the subject, does anyone have any good or bad experiences
to relate regarding hooking one of these up to a Macintosh?  The
price/performance ratio looks good, but I'd like to know if there are
any compatibility problems.

I have a relatively old Mac Plus that I'm using, so that could possibly
compound the problem.

Thanks.

Ken
--

*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
Kenneth M. Butler                           (214) 917-1759 (office)
Texas Instruments                           (214) 917-7966 (FAX)
P.O. Box 650311 MS 3937                     kenb@dadd.ti.com
Dallas, TX 75265
*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
From: chandler@beagle.UUCP (Jim Chandler)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: 16550 Uart questions..
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 92 21:48:03 PST
Distribution: world
Organization: Total and Complete Disorganization

jeroenp@rulfc1.LeidenUniv.nl (Jeroen W. Pluimers) writes:

> There are 16-it dumb serial cards. You need a 16-bit slot to enable high IRQs
> (go beyond IRQ8).
> 
> Mostly these cards are multi I/O cards (4 serial, 1 parallel, 1 game, 1 mouse
> with 16550's preinstalled and bidirectional parallel ports.
> 

Anyone know where I can find one of these cards?

------------
Jim Chandler, KD6IRV
jwc@sactoh0.sac.ca.us
sactoh0!beagle!chandler
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: scottb@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com (TheLrdLovsAHngn)
Subject: sportster 14.4/16.8 adventures
Organization: United Technologies Research Center
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 21:05:31 GMT

Hi all,

since last posting/asking about the sportster and hst 16.8 modem settings,
my friend and I have made a few discoveries.  
Discovery #1:

if you type atgw03c6,22gw05cb,2f &h1 &r2 &b1 - you and up with
USR Courier v.32bis settings (type ati4 to see this)

if you type atgw03c6,22gw05cd,2f &h1 &r2 &b1 - you end up with
USR 16.8 HST settings       ^Note: this is a D, this is the only difference
from the first line.

Then upon dialing into a 16.8 bbs, I was able to get a cps thru-put of
1875 chars.  Probably couldve gotten a little higher, but transfer finished.

The downfall of all this is, my friend who has the sportster 14.4 (with 4.1 
rom) and I cannout successfully connect at 16.8 (with above settings).  It
would seem that you need to have a real 16.8 HST on one end of the connection.
Of course I could be wrong, so if anyone can duplicate/prove/disprove my
findings, please post here for all to see.
-- 
Disclaimer:  I didn't do it!  Nobody saw me do it!  You can't prove anything! 
             My opinions are my own.   They do not reflect anyone/thing else!
\/       preferred        \/
scottb%nw8550@utrcgw.utc.com            |           sdb@rcinet.utc.com
From: birchall@pilot.njin.net (Shag)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: PPI Modem IS REALLLLLLLY BAD!!!@%!@%!@
Date: 30 Dec 92 17:40:37 GMT
Organization: Screaming in Digital, the Queensryche Digest

spyder@admiral.uucp (Eric) writes:

>>>I have a PM14400FXSA, and the modem has got to be the worst modem on the
>>>market.  I have had nothing but problems with it, and I practically have
>>>to baby-sit it, since it is so bad....  
>>>...Anyway, there is no hope for a product with quality as cheap as this.  

>Actually, I tried the USR Courier v.32bis modem, and it worked nicely,
>but that's not the point....I'm getting one more modem from PPI,
>and then off to the Sportster if it doesn't work..

So you've tried one PPI unit, which doesn't work for you, and one USR unit,
which does... I would definitely suggest getting in touch with PPI's tech
support folks and arranging to get a replacement PPI, _or_ being a little
more diplomatic with your choice of words ("no hope for a product with
quality as cheap as this").  Yeah, there are bad units out there.  But
that'll happen with anything, from modems to turnip twaddlers. ;)

-Shag

-- 
Shag                    | Operator, ShagNET | Editor of "Screaming in Digital" 
birchall@pilot.njin.net |  Rutgers / NJIN   |  The Queensryche E-mail Digest 
birchall@njin.bitnet    | dialup access for | queensryche-owner@pilot.njin.net
shag@most.other.places  | Burlington County | Anything Queensryche, every week
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Could somebody tell me the quality of Zoom Modems?
From: dan@gac.edu (Dan Boehlke)
Date: 29 Dec 1992 15:11:55 GMT
Reply-To: dan@gac.edu
Distribution: world
Organization: Gustavus Adolphus College
NNTP-Posting-Host: nic.gac.edu

> I have the external Zoom VFX, and it talks just fine to
> Practical Peripheral, Intel, Telebit, USR and a host of
> others at 14.4 kbps and beyond. 

I also have two external Zoom VFX modems, one is in a town
with a less than modern exchange and they work fine,
although the few times I have had problems connecting to
something, and the guy on the other end finds out is is a
Zoom, it is the first thing blaimed and I have to prove that
it is not.  Luckly I am a data communications type guy, so I
can usually tell.  The most common problem is incorrectly
configured V.32 or V.32bis modems that have been set up
for auto answer on client systems, sometimes lacking
flow control or other such things.  The reference book
that comes with the Zoom is wonderfull.  Apparently
correctly configuring any high speed modems and serial
ports is still a black art for some people. 

--
Dan Boehlke                    Internet:  dan@gac.edu
Academic Computing             BITNET:    dan@gacvax1.bitnet
Gustavus Adolphus College
St. Peter, MN 56082 USA        Phone:     (507)933-7596
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: paulxxxx@leland.Stanford.EDU (paulastya gupta)
Subject: Looking for 9600data modem used/new
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 08:54:44 GMT

Can anyone please advise me how to go about getting a good deal on 
a modem with a minimum data rate of 9600?  I am going to connect this 
to a dummy terminal.  Since I am on a budget, a used one would do
nicely!

Thanks.

- paulxxxx@leland.stanford.edu

p.s. any names of shops in bay area would aslo be appreciated.
From: mossako@obelix.uni-muenster.de (Martin Mossakowski)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Problem with WinFAX PRO fixed
Date: 30 Dec 1992 08:55:10 +0100
Organization: Westf. Wilh.-Universitaet Muenster, Germany
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: obelix.uni-muenster.de

Hi,
that was the first time that noone had a clue to my problem. Maybe it's
holiday.
But in the meantime I got the solution from a friend. The resolution
for sending graphics to an ordinary paper fax was too high. So whenever
you send to a paper fax change from 200x200 dpi to 100x200.

Does someone know what the normal resolution for a paper fax is?

BYe

-- 
== Martin Mossakowski     mossako@obelix.uni-muenster.de
==         Once there was a footstep in the sand
==         Was it a white man, a black man, a Chinese ...?
==         The sand answered "It was a man..."   (Unknown)"
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: 9600 baud on AT&T 3B2
Keywords: modem, 3B2
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 16:24:52 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

ddavis@highlite.uucp (Darrel L. Davis) writes:

> I need information regarding hooking up a 9600 baud modem to 
> an AT&T 3B2/500 so that it can be used as both dial-in AND
> dial-out.  The 3B2 has 8-pin rj45 ports and it seems to be a 
> problem juggling signals.

   A couple of years back I wired a Trailblazer Plus into a 3B2 of some 
flavour which was acting as an I/O processor for a 3B4000.  I grabbed the 
hardware manual, one of those devices which wires an RJ45 socket to a DB-25, 
and wired one up myself. 

   Unfortunately, this was a one-time thing and some time ago.  We did not 
test it extensively, and I don't remember much of what I learned at the time.  
I do remember, however, that the hardware was trivially simple (if you have 
RS-232 pin usage for high speed modems memorized and access to a pinout 
diagram for the RJ45), and the software no more tedious than setting up a 
dialin/dialout modem on, say SCO XENIX. <ducking>

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
From: matttrem@willard.UUCP (Matthew Trembley)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Could somebody tell me the quality of Zoom Modems?
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 92 11:41:59 EST
Organization: Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814

I'm thinking of upgrading to a 14.4 Zoom modem with all the kinds of 
compression and correction(internal).  It also faxes.  It says that it
has 16550 UART and speeds up to 57,600 bps.
It is for sale for $219.  
Could someone tell me if this is a good deal and if the modem is of good 
quality?
Thanks in advance.

-- 
matttrem@willard.UUCP (Matthew Trembley)
gatech!vdbsan!willard!matttrem
emory!uumind!willard!matttrem
Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mckeeveb@monashee.sfu.ca (Gumby - The unknown user)
Subject: Re: ZyXEL voice and flow control
Keywords: ZyXEL voice flow control
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 22:58:42 GMT

rkimball@athena.qualcomm.com (Robert Kimball) writes:

>I have been playing around with voice mail and my ZyXEL and ran into
>a problem.  It does not appear that flow control works in voice mode.
>I have set the modem to hardware flow control with the at&h3 command
>and get everything set to send voice data to the modem.  My computer
>talks to the modem at 56Kbps and when I send the voice data to the
>modem the audio skips sections of speach but is inteligible.  I know
>the file is OK because if I reduce the speed that I send the voice data
>to the modem everything works fine...but this is not the correct
>solution.  Does anyone have any ideas?

I believe this was stated in the voice-mode commands addendum to the
original manual.  It does say that XON and XOFF should work.

(This is, of course, assuming that I read into it correctly)

-- 
    Rob McKeever  VE7ICJ  rmckeeve@sfu.ca  mckeeveb@sfu.ca  604-291-0457
"Do you know what standards are?  They're career paths for people who don't
 want to work!" - John Parkinson, Ernst & Young at the BCDMA Conference '92
       -*-          Standard Disclaimers should be adequate        -*-
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson)
Subject: Zoom Info needed
Summary: Looking for switch settings or Zoom address/phone #
Keywords: Zoom modem address switches
Reply-To: Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon.
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 12:02:28 GMT

I've got an *old* Zoom 2400 *internal* modem with no docs. 
The Board says:

ZOOM TELEPHONICS

03/20/86	REV. 3.0

(a bunch of FCC info )

EP-6 94V-O

The FCC ID is: #BDN9 FM-14931-DM-E

Any info would be appreciated. Especially a phone number for Zoom
so I can see if I can get a manual for this!

-- 
Leonard Erickson		      leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com
CIS: [70465,203]			 70465.203@compuserve.com
FIDO:   1:105/51	 Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
(The CIS & Fido addresses are preferred)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: jeroenp@rulfc1.LeidenUniv.nl (Jeroen W. Pluimers)
Subject: Re: 16550 Uart questions..
Organization: Dept. FMC, Gorlaeus Labs, Leiden University, The Netherlands
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 92 20:21:29 GMT

In article <wmHewB5w165w@zswamp.UUCP> geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh) writes:
>
>   I've never seen a 16-bit dumb serial card.  The $400+ intelligent 

There are 16-it dumb serial cards. You need a 16-bit slot to enable high IRQs
(go beyond IRQ8).

Mostly these cards are multi I/O cards (4 serial, 1 parallel, 1 game, 1 mouse)
with 16550's preinstalled and bidirectional parallel ports.

--
jeroen                             voice: +31-2522-20908 (19:00-23:00 UTC)
                                   snail: P.O. Box 266
jeroenp@rulfc1.LeidenUniv.nl              2170 AG Sassenheim
jeroen_pluimers@f256.n281.z2.fidonet.org  The Netherlands
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: 16550 Uart questions..
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 15:12:22 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

jeroenp@rulfc1.LeidenUniv.nl (Jeroen W. Pluimers) writes:

> In article <wmHewB5w165w@zswamp.UUCP> geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh) writ
> >   I've never seen a 16-bit dumb serial card.  The $400+ intelligent 
> 
> There are 16-it dumb serial cards. You need a 16-bit slot to enable high IRQs
> (go beyond IRQ8).

   I'm both out of date and spoiled; the dumb serial cards I know are older 
designs from DigiBoard and ARNET, and they required only 8-bit slots.  It's 
nice to hear that you can now use them on the higher interrupts.

> Mostly these cards are multi I/O cards (4 serial, 1 parallel, 1 game, 1 mouse
> with 16550's preinstalled and bidirectional parallel ports.

   I figured that, if 16-bit dumb serial cards existed, they wouldn't be of 
the normal variety used for DOS applications.  Still, I haven't actually seen 
any of these; the 16-bit multi I/O cards I know of are 16 bits wide because of 
IDE adapters, and still don't offer access to the high interrupts for the 
serial ports.

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
From: ikhan@solar.usc.edu (Irfan Khan)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Places to purchase ZyXEL modems
Date: 28 Dec 1992 19:07:51 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: solar.usc.edu


Dear Fellow Netters:

This is not a follow-up article, I tried posting, for some reason
could'nt. 

I have two questions for some knowledgeable netters.

1. What kind of error control scheme does FTP protocol use ?, e.g.
is it GO BACK N, SELECTIVE REPEAT ETC., also is there any FEC provided.

2. I need to transfer data long distance using modems connected to PCs at 
both ends.  I would like to save on the telephone cost as much as possible.
What package/protocol would you recommend ?



Thanks


-Irfan Khan


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Irfan Khan, USC, Los Angeles                          | ikhan@solar.usc.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Telebit T1000 queston
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 93 12:27:59 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson) writes:

> I believe it supports:
> [...]
> ???		300 bps (European)

   I believe that this would be V.21, but my T1000 makes no mention of it.

> [...]
> And it *may* be able to support the CCITT V.23(?) standard (that's the
> one with the 1200 bps/75 bps split send/receive rate.

   The manual also makes no mention of this.

   Now that you mention it, though, I thought I'd mention that my ZyXEL U-
1496E had a bad habit of recognizing a V.23 carrier (CONNECT 1200/75) when a 
caller gave up and all that was on the line was a dial tone.

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: larry@gator.use.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: USR modems..
Organization: Gator Communications - Feeds-R-Us 219-289-3745 
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 16:54:04 GMT

Steven_Lam@mindlink.bc.ca (Steven Lam) writes:

>I notice that there isn't too many messages on here concerning US Robotics
>products.  Especially the Sporster and Courier v.32bis fax and dual standard
>fax products.  Is there anybody out there who use them?  Any comments or
>critisim?  I sell USR modems and would like to find out people's opinion on
>them.  BTW, I have a Dual Standard with fax and am VERY happy with it.

I have them and can only suggest them for SLIP connections.  USR Screwed
up when they decided to only support Fax Class 1, and their lack of any
involvement in the UUCP world (as compared to other vendors) is hurting
them in this market.

They are good modems, but at a premium price.  The Telebits are overall
excellent modems in the same price as the USR -- so they get my vote..
-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.use.com
keeper of the Gator                                   uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
From: larry@gator.use.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: Worldblazer/T-3000 question
Organization: Gator Communications - Feeds-R-Us 219-289-3745 
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 15:53:07 GMT

tener@cs.widener.edu (Stuart Tener) writes:

>eproms? Or are there any hardware differences. I was going to have my
>customers buy T-3000s for now, and then upgrade them (via eprom) to
>V.FAST when it comes out.

Has Telebit made the announcement of the T3000/Worldblazer being
upgradable to v.fast?  I don't remember seeing this anywhere, but
I would welcome it since I own several Worldblazers..

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.use.com
keeper of the Gator                                   uucp: uunet!gator!larry
From: Mick_Schmidt@hb.maus.de (Mick Schmidt)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: ZyXEL connecting to other mode
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 92 12:59:00 GMT
Organization: MausNet (Mitglied im IN e.V.)
X-Gateway: MausGate/News 1.14D/hb

clau@acs.ucalgary.ca (Christopher Lau) wrote in article
                              <92Dec25.232712.10597@acs.ucalgary.ca>:

>Has anyone out there had any luck connecting a ZyXEL 1496E with 5.02
>ROMS to a Telebit 1000 under V.32?  I haven't had much luck at all..
>usually it doesn't connect, but if it DOES, its 2400/MNP4...  I have a
>similar problem with a MultiTech V.32-it always connects, but only at
>2400/MNP4.

Hmm, I might be wrong, but as far as I know the T-1000 is only capable of
V.22bis (2400) and PEP, but not V.32 (9600).

The T-2500 does also V.32, but no V.32bis. The Worldblazer finally has all
V.22bis, V.32bis, PEP and as another goodie TurboPEP. ;-)

Tschau Mick
--
Mick Schmidt          | Mausnet: Mick Schmidt @ HB             | Hear me now
Kopenhagener Str. 145 | Fido   : Mick Schmidt%Maus HB (242/2.6)| and believe
2820 Bremen 77        | Usenet : Mick_Schmidt@hb.maus.de       | me later!
Germany               |          g16m@alf.zfn.uni-Bremen.de    | (Hans &
Tel. +49 421 63 52 70 |      (No Mails > 40 KByte !!!)         |   Franz)
From: kline@cs.arizona.edu (Nick Kline)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: latest zmodem spec wanted.
Date: 22 Dec 92 22:34:16 GMT

Why is the 1988 spec the only one that is out there?  There are references
to later versions of the protocol.  

I'm trying to find a zmodem spec that has the 1990 extensions, ie that
cover things like compression and so forth.  

Or a spec that covers the latest extensions.

All the yzmodem.arc files I have found are the 1988 version.  

Could someone either:

a) email me the latest
or 
b) tell me where I could ftp or email to get the latest docs?

I tried to reach caf but all my mail to him bounces.
I have tried archie and looking around but all of the info I get is
for the older versions.

thanks,
nick kline
kline@cs.arizona.edu
From: aland@informix.com (Colonel Panic)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Prodigy Eagle Modem (Retraction)
Summary: Eagle vs. Scout
Date: 1 Jan 93 01:29:28 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Helen Keller Bondurant's Performance Driving School for the Blind

In article <1992Dec29.151354.5886@illian.mnet.com> darylm@illian.mnet.com (Daryl V. McDaniel) writes:
>Over the Christmas weekend, I played with the modem some more and verified
>that it really is V.32bis.  I should have caught on when the modem began
>talking to the (supplied) communications software at 38400 baud.
>
>To make a long and embarassing story short, the V.32bis modems I was trying
>to connect to were configured wrong and wouldn't allow V.32bis when
>answering.  They have been corrected and the Eagle talks to them happily.

OK, so... now that V.32bis is verified, in what ways does the Eagle differ
from the Scout, feature-wise?    Wolfgang?

--
Alan Denney      aland@informix.com      {pyramid|uunet}!infmx!aland

  Smith and Wesson: the Ultimate Point-and-Click User Interface.
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:18467 comp.os.os2.misc:40337