HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Mark Kovarski <kovarski@zooid.guild.org>
Subject: * OS/2 2.0 specific ATI drivers Available *
Organization: ZOOiD BBS
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 02:49:24 GMT


There are two good news to report. Here we go:

1) Currently, ATI has the OS/2 2.0 drivers available for download. These are
   the drivers for the 16-Bit GRE and the ATI MACH 8 cards.
   The drivers are 132077 Kbytes in length (compressed) and are under the
   filename OS2ACC.ZIP . The Microchannel bus version is also available
   under OS2MCA.ZIP and is 131574 Kbytes in length.
   Both can be downloaded from the ATI BBS at (416) 756-4591. This is in
   Toronto, Canada.

2) There have been reports that the new cards from ATI (Pro and +) do not
   work with ISA machines over 16 Megabytes of RAM. The beta version is
   also available and is under the filename BLD46.ZIP - 154306 Kbytes in
   length. 

Pass this information around to all users...

Best Regards,
Mark K.
Toronto, Canada
E-Mail: kovarski@zooid.guild.org
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jdsmith@novell.com (Doug Smith)
Subject: TSENG or TRIDENT
Organization: Novell NPD
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:24:54 GMT

I'm considering the purchase of either a TSENG ET400 or a Trident 8900 card 
to run OS/2 in SVGA mode.  Does anyone have opinions about which card is 
better (faster, more stable drivers, etc)?

Doug Smith
UNIX Desktop Group
Novell NPD
jdsmith@novell.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: grichard@swimming.cis.ohio-state.edu (Golden Richard III)
Subject: Bad postscript w/ WINOS2 postscript printer driver?
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 21:41:07 GMT


Has anyone encountered problems with the WINOS2 postscript printer
driver generating bad postscript output?  The specific problem occurs
with Amipro 3.0 under WINOS2 (the only program I run under WINOS2, so
I don't have a lot of basis for comparison).  Usually the problem
creeps in when I have large pictures (created with the Amipro drawing
package) interspersed in the text of a document.  Various postscript
printers simply refuse to print the page on which the picture appears,
ghostscript dies with a "/rangecheck in setlinecap" error.  Usually
the picture can be printed alone (i.e. the postscript generated for
the picture alone, or the text without the picture is ok), so the
picture itself isn't the problem.   Help!

Please respond via email, as I can't currently read the group (General
exams...a perfect time to have a problem like this).


Thanks!

--Golden

P.S.  I have *not* yet installed the CSD.   Does it address this problem?

-- 
Golden Richard III             OSU Dept. of Computer and Information Science
grichard@cis.ohio-state.edu                                   (614) 292-0056
From: tc@soda.berkeley.edu (Tc Cheng)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Complete OS/2 Crash on Maxtor 213a
Date: 20 Nov 1992 20:18:31 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu


My OS/2 completely died.  One morning I turned my machine on and 
the system failed to even display the OS/2 logo screen and just
displayed SYS1025 and SYS 1027 errors and froze.

I booted OS/2 from a floopy disk and ran check disk; some major
damage was done to the EA's, and 2 files not related to OS/2 were 
cross linked.  The EA's were fixed so I tried to boot the system
again.  It slowly, grudgingly booted and when the WPS came up
a message box poped up and said that WPS ini files damaged and 
only a cmd.exe window was opened.  For some reason this messaged box
kept coming up and infinite sessins of cmd.exe's were being run.

I turned off the machine and booted flopy again; no errors this time
except for the 2 irrevalent cross-links.  I booted hard and 
was greeted with 1025 and 1027.  Zonkers!

So I booted DOS (I have 1 FAT partition of 200mb on a Maxter 213a).
I ran Norton disk doctor and it indicated that the FAT is damaged 
and repaired it.  With that came the usualy bunch of lost clusters and
cross links.  I noticed both OS2.INI and OS2SYS.INI  were in the
casualty list.

Anyhow I booted OS/2 again and 1025 and 1027 stopped it cold. 
So I rebooted DOS and ran Norton Disk Doctor only to find that
more of the FAT was damaged and more files trashed....


This problem has occured before during GA and I hoped that after
I installed SP it would go away and it didn't.  Is this possibly
some kind of hardware problem, especially, hard drive or controller?

Any help would be appreciated.

tc
-- 

tc

===============================================================================
From: rdippold@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: software for Zyxel Fax Modem under OS/2?
Date: 17 Nov 92 19:27:35 GMT
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA

djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum) writes:
>My Zyxel 1496E came with Zfax, a DOS fax program. Is anyone using this
>with OS/2? Are there any special considerations for OS/2 use? Finally,

Yes and no, respectively.  Although your best bet is to make a very
small DOS window for ZFax, then make sure it always runs in the
background.  This way it's always there, but doesn't use much in the
way of resources.
-- 
We're all over it, like a cheap suit.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Win-OS/2 won't work in background?
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:58:30 GMT

In article <9675@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum) writes:
>I started a Win-OS/2 full-screen session by using the object in the
>command prompts folder and installed AmiPro from there. I tweaked the
>setting for the Win-OS/2 full-screen object according to the FAQ and I
>also followed instructions about disabling the Win-OS/2 Print Manager.
>AmiPro works as advertised (beautifully!) when I am in my Win-OS/2
>session. But ...
>... if I start printing and then switch back to the WPS, the Win-OS/2
>session stops sending output to the printer. If I switch back to the
>full-screen Win-OS/2 session, AmiPro resumes where it left off.

This problem is mentioned in the OS/2 README file, namely that
Win-OS/2 (or for that matter DOS) programs which use SuperVGA modes
cannot (usually) run in the background.

To get around this problem, you can run seamlessly or you can run with
an improved Win-OS/2 (Windows) SuperVGA driver.  ATI has released a
set of such drivers, I believe, and they can be retrieved via
anonymous ftp from ftp-os2.nmsu.edu.  I'm not sure about other
vendors.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
From: jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Crashing OS/2 - No.1
Date: 17 Nov 1992 13:09:17 GMT
Organization: UT Health Science Center Houston

In article <Bxv0nE.nJ@brunel.ac.uk> me90plb@brunel.ac.uk (Paul L Barnfather) writes:
>Why does this cause OS/2 to hang, requiring a COLD reboot:
>-Start ANY WIN-OS/2 program seamless.
>-Drag something on the WPS desktop.
>This causes the mouse pointer to disappear, and the keyboard locks.
>Any running apps. also 'freeze'. I then need to cold reboot.

On my system, the mouse pointer stayed around, but the rest of it locked up. I
had to hit the reset switch.

>I'm fairly sure the problem bust be specific to my system[...]

Most likely not. My system isn't much like yours: 386-40, Cyrix 387, 16 meg,
serial mouse on COM1:, 512K Trident 9000 in 800x600x16 with original Trident
drivers, Adaptec ACB2372B RLL controller, and Maxtor XT1140 drive (formatted
as 40 meg C: and 191 meg D:).
-- 
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu      | adequately be explained by stupidity.
           "Cat: Four legs and an attitude." -- Jim Reese
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: cnadler@vnet.ibm.com (Cliff Nadler)
Subject: Re: How do I unfragment my HD
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 14:40:28 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.15 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: cnadler@vnet.ibm.com (Cliff Nadler)
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research

In <722157399.F00005@tdkt.kksys.com> Bertram.Moshier@f115.n282.z1.tdkt.kksys.com (Bertram Moshier) writes:
>Yes, you can defrag your FAT disk after booting DOS natively.

WORD OF WARNING!!!!!

Make sure your DOS defragmenter copies the ENTIRE file entry from the FAT
table to it's new position. OS/2 uses some reserved areas from the DOS header
(table entry, not file header) to keep the extended attributes on FAT systems
and some defraggers do not copy this data.

Call the software manufacturer if you are not sure and make sure to make a
complete backup before defragmenting.

>
>BTW, one of the advantages of HPFS is it defrags itself.  While it
>doesn't defrag files, it works hard at keeping its bands compressed.

I don't think HPFS defrags itself, its algorithm just makes it more resistant
to fragmentation.

>BTW, the GammaTech utilities provide HPFS file defrag.
>
>Bert Moshier
>

Good luck on your new job, Bert (whichever one you take)!

Cliff
Note: This posting represents the views of the poster, not those of IBM
(except maybe in wising Bert good luck !)
Organization: Senior, Social & Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:47:11 -0500 
From: Jeffrey Michael Gerber <jg3s+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: SVGA in DOS Full Screen

I recently installed the generic 800x600x16 driver (yay!) and it works
well.  However, on my first start-up, I found that the screen wasn't
centered.  So, I used the controls on my NEC 3D to center the picture. 
Everything looks fine.  However, now if I go to a DOS Full Screen and
try to run something in 800x600x(anything), the screen isn't centered. 
Using the NEC controls works, but then messed up the WPS.  As well, some
programs (i.e. CSHOW) will show a little copy of WPS (corrupted a bit)
in the upper right hand corner along with whatever it's supposed to be
showing.

Why would the WPS's 800x600 not use the same monitor mode as DOS?  Why
the messy little-WPS on SVGA screens in DOS?  Would toying with
SVGADATA.PMI fix this?  If so, anyone know what to do?

Thanks, Jeff
From: john.moody@flashb.uucp (John Moody) 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: TRIDENT INFORMATION
Date: 16 Nov 92 21:27:00 GMT
Reply-To: john.moody@flashb.uucp (John Moody) 
Distribution: WORLD
Organization: Moody's Computer Service Shopper (MCSS) - FWB, FL - 904-863-2510

To:  All

Well, I am amazed at the events which happened this afternoon.
I installed OS/2 in logical drive e:  as fat; in logical drive f: as
fat.

drive e:-------------Beta GRE-WIN

drive f:-------------GA + CSD

Well, the sequence is I installed the beta first and when I was
installing the CSD to the GA in drive f:  I deselected the e: drive so
it wouldn't get updated with the CSD.  Anyway on the last diskette, #12
of the 3.5 CSD...I noticed it was taking a little longer than the other
diskettes.   What the CSD did was install to E: as well as F:.

The effect, none that I see so far as the partitions go,,they both boot
up as they should.

The amazement is, I used the device install in the OS/2 System Folder
and applied the Trident 800-600-16 driver to the GRE-WIN Beta partition
and wouldn't you know it...NOW MY TRIDENT CARD IS WORKING PERFECTLY.
I do not have to readjust the screen...there is no flickering or lost of
the picture when I go from graphics in a full screen back to the WPS.

I couldn't believe what my eyes were showing me...so as you guessed, I
decided to apply this same driver to the GA-CDS partition.  IT STILL
WORKS!!!

I am going to nail this sucker down and only upgrade when everything
else is fixed...I can live with this one so far.

Will keep you posted.  So much for BETA testing!!
From: jolly@mountain.gold.sub.org (Thomas Johler)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: A neat idea for speeding up seamless WIN-OS2
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 10:03:56 +0100
Organization: Mountain, Bavaria

In <1992Nov15.211334.146@njitgw.njit.edu> dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:
>Like most others, I can't stand waiting for seamless WIN-OS2 to start
>up an application.  So I tried the following with much success:

>Migrate the WIN-OS2 program manager (C:\OS2\MDOS\WINOS2\PROGMAN.EXE)
>to a WPS icon.  Run it.  Program manager pops up.  From there, you can
>launch Windows apps seamlessly and they load quickly, since WIN-OS2
>never terminates.  Program Manager can be minimized (as always) if you
>want to get it off the screen.

This works with ANY other seamlessly-windowed application, as long as you
don't select the "separate session" checkbox in Win-os2-settings. You can
start any apllication from WPS as quickly as from ProgramManager as long
as e.g. windows clock is running.

Cheers,
	Thomas

-- 
Thomas Johler, tel. +49-89-506584          | There's a finite number of 
subnet:   jolly@mountain.gold.sub.org      | jokes in the universe.
internet: johler@informatik.tu-muenchen.de |            - Talking Heads
-------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:56:41 EST
From: <MTC107@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Orchard Farenheight 1280 video card
Distribution: world


<Could somebody please post the modes that the orchard farenheight 1280 video
<card is capable of please. The distributors here in NZ clain 24-bit@640x480,
<down to 8-bit@1024x768, and 4-bit@1280x1024 (interlaced).

<Can somebody who has one let me know exactly what it will do please.

This is correct for Windows or DOS drivers.  However, there are only 1024x768
256 color "beta" drivers for OS/2.  These drivers are BETA versions, and do
have some problems.

Mark
From: pickrell@hoss.unl.edu (Andrew Pickrell)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: pause in loading os/2
Date: 21 Nov 1992 17:09:04 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska--Lincoln	
Distribution: comp
NNTP-Posting-Host: hoss.unl.edu

In <1992Nov21.4881.33591@dosgate> "marc bourassa" <marc.bourassa@canrem.com> writes:

>>Sometime in the last couple of weeks, a pause has developed in the loading
>>of OS/2.  After the title screen with the GA text comes up, the computer
>>waits about 10 seconds before hitting the harddrive again.
>>Does anyone know the reason behind this or better yet, a solution???

>Hi Andrew,

>I'm not sure what you mean by "GA Text", this may invalidate my 
>suggestion. I have applied the Service Pack and noticed a growing delay 
>on boot-up of OS/2. It turns out that my OS2SYS.INI file had grown 
>substantially (from 300+ K to over 6 Megs now!). I have a CALL in my 
>CONFIG.SYS file that XCOPYs my OS2.INI and OS2SYS.INI files to a backup 
>directory. You may have the same problem.

>                         DCMB
>---
>  DeLuxe 1.25 #7328  Do Agnostics engage in Idol speculation?

What I mean by "GA text" is the openning credits screen.  The 3 little
>--OS/2 pics show up then the full screen OS/2 picture (like on the stickers)
with the IBM copywrite message shows.  There is then a 10 second pause
before it changes to "Loading... ".

This never use to be there.  I don't believe it could be the ini files
at that point since the wps is not being openned yet, and I haven't made
any changes in the config.sys since before it started.

As a side note, my ini's are both less than 100k.

Thanks for the respose.
Andrew Pickrell

--
===========================================================================
Andrew Pickrell                   | My opinions are my own,
UNL Dept. of Chemical Engineering | but they could be yours too
EMail :pickrell@hoss.unl.edu      | for the low price of 5 bucks...
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: fali@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Fathei Ali)
Subject: Re: OS/2, Trident, Seamless, 1024x768
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 23:09:49 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.183118.4318@eng.umd.edu> hamilton@eng.umd.edu (Andrew W. Hamilton) writes:
>OK.  For the last time.  All of us Trident owners would like to
>know the answer to one simple question.  Please help if you can.
>
>Has _anyone_ had personal experience getting all four of the following
>to work at the _same_ time?  If so, how on earth did you do it?
>
>1.  OS/2 2.0 desktop
>2.  Trident SVGA card
>3.  Seamless Windows
>4.  1024x768 video mode
>
>If anyone has figured this out, I will personally buy you a beer.
>
>Thanks in stupidity,
>

 With the Trident chip set,
 the only mode that has seamless windows support,at least at the
 moment is 800x600x16. Sorry to disappoint you.


-- 
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Department of chemistry        /      l         \ l          l l  
        U of T, Toronto        ,O__l___|___l_C   ,O  ,ll___|_|_|__l l  
        Canada M5S 1A1         |        **       |
From: pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (George Jetson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: How to "register" new hardware with OS/2?
Date: 16 Nov 92 02:45:35 GMT
Reply-To: pynq@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: D. J. Dougherty & Associates

In article <burleigh.721859932@ogre> burleigh@ogre.cica.indiana.edu (Frank Burleigh) writes:
>>of it.  Is there some way to restore the drive to the factory condition,
>>or do I have to take it back to the store?  (I was able to re-install
>>OS/2 on the drive, seemingly w/o problems, but I may at some point
>>decide to trash OS/2 entirely, and I'd hate to have to trash the drive
>>as well)
>
>Your article didn't mention the type of the partion(s) you created.
>If you created a HPFS partition, then no, "real" DOS booted from a
>floppy won't recognize it; the disk's partition table will contain 
>info to the effect that, "DOS, you don't do this kind of disk..."

I know my article must have sounded like the ravings of a lunatic.  I
can assure that I am not a lunatic (motto of the week, right?)

It was created as an HPFS.  The issue is not whether I can access it
from a DOS session (that is a trivial question).  The issue is that when
I boot a DOS floppy and run FDISK, FDISK hangs for a long time and then
reports that it cannot access the disk.  It then becomes impossible to
delete the OS/2 partitions and/or setup DOS partitions, since the disk
is utterly inaccesible to FDISK (although FDISK knows it is there).
When I ran the PD util EDPART, it reports a controller error on the disk.

Another poster suggested using OS/2 to change it from an HPFS to a FAT,
then using DOS FDISK (or, I assume, EDPART) to blow the partitions away.
That sounds like it might work...  Still, it was rather scary to get
controller errors on this (brand new) disk.

(Also, I do understand that FDISK itself will not blow the partitions
away, since it prefers to leave non-DOS partitions alone.  EDPART has no
such qualms, however...)

************************************************************************
I've been told to back off on the diode jokes, but I still don't
like smileys ;-)

	- pynq@quads.uchicago.edu, who is still costing the net
	  hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars, every time he posts -
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rom@cci632.cci.com (Rudynell S. Millian)
Subject: Gateway 2000 486SX/33,...
Organization: [Computer Consoles, Inc., Rochester, NY
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:04:00 GMT


	Is anyone out there running OS/2 2.0 on the new Gateway 2000 486SX/33?
It supposedly has the WD-90C31 video chip, which is also used in some Dell 
machines. Does the WD-90C31 support OS/2 or vice versa?
From: rkimmel@stein.u.washington.edu (Robert Kimmel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Seamless Windows with ET4000 & CSD
Date: 17 Nov 92 13:58:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Nov17.135851.10280
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <1ear74INN42n@ni.umd.edu> dan@ni.umd.edu (Dan Burns) writes:
>
>
>Do the new ET4000 drivers that come with the CSD provide seamless windows,
>or just higher resolutions than 640x480?
>
>--Dan
>
Both.
From: phaniraj@plains.NoDak.edu (V. Phaniraj)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Known SP bugs: (Diamond video card related)
Keywords: SP, bugs, ET4000
Date: 19 Nov 92 19:55:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.BxzBCM.B9q
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

In article <75295@hydra.gatech.EDU> gt0040a@prism.gatech.EDU (Tom Sorensen) writes:

>1. Diamond Speedstar Adapter with the Tseng ET4000 Chip
> 
>   Configuring this adapter for Super VGA (SVGA) and high resolution
>   results in an out-of-sync Desktop or unsynchronized monitor.
> 
>   To correct the problem:
> 

[..detailed procedure deleted]

The suggestion was to boot into DOS or a VMB, and create
a new SVGADATA.PMI file, using VMODE MONITOR, VMODE 38 and 
then SVGA ON, rather than doing it under an OS/2 DOS emulation.

On the 3 machines I tried this on, SVGA ON gave me the error
"Unknown adapter/chipset". This makes no sense, since 

(1) SVGA WHO does recognize the chipset as the ET4000, and says the
    usual thing about lucid information and Chip/Dale.

(2) SVGA ON if run from a DOS fullscreen session under OS/2 works 
    ( giving me sync. problems)

I'm using Version 3.24 of VMODE, and Diamond Speedstar cards ( not
Plus, and not the 24X). The monitors are the Gateway CS1024 NI's.

Anyone else seeing this kind of behavior ?

Raj
-- 
V. Phaniraj					phaniraj@plains.NoDak.edu
Assistant Professor, Electrical Engineering	phaniraj@ndsuvm1 (BITNET)
North Dakota State University, Fargo ND 58105	(701) 298-1024 (work)
						(701) 237-8677 (FAX) 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: bharris@hfglobe.intel.com (Bennie Harris)
Subject: Re: copyini vs cpyini
Keywords: OS2SYS.INI file size growing
Organization: Intel Corporation
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 16:41:36 GMT

sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:

>In article <10028@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum) writes:
>>>The cpyini program that I an d (I suspect) most people are using is the
>>>one in the hobbes uploads directory, which does not have a companion program.
>>>In my opinion, it is much easier to use than the checkini/copyini programs
>>>which have been around for quite some time now.
>>I just checked this out. Except for the name change (copyini.exe vs
>>cpyini.exe), these files seem identical (date, time, size, and look and
>>feel). How can one be easier than the other? One less letter to type in
>>the filename? :-)

>While we're on the subject of the massively growing INI file, and
>after apparently ruling out DeskPic as the culprit, is there anyone
>NOT using 4OS2 who suffers from the problem?  (In other words, shall
>4OS2 be nominated as the culprit?)

>-- 
>Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0g, available from
>sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
>Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
>of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]

I don't think it is 4OS2. I removed 4OS2 for a while and my os2sys.ini file
still grows. The problem appear to be random as I cannot get any one activity
that will make the file grow to be repeatable. I can use my machine one night
and not see it grow but the next night I will see that it has grown again
usually from 140K to 232K. Also the rate at which it grows is random. I was
using 4OS2 before applying the SP with no growing os2sys.ini problem. I have also
seen my os2.ini file grow but at a smaller rate.

-- Bennie Harris
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: json@treankare.met.kth.se (Anders Jacobsson)
Subject: STB Wind/X Driver
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, NADA
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 08:00:49 GMT

Hi, does anyone know anything about a driver for STB Wind/X
accelarator card, it has an S3 accelarator chip. My computer
works OK right know but a specific driver would be usefull.
Anders

E-mail: json@met.kth.se
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc