HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: smiller@pencom.com (Stephen Miller)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: another good western
Date: 13 Apr 92 00:34:03 GMT
Organization: Pencom Software

Yet another good western that I haven't seen
mentioned yet is "Bite the Bullet", a 1975 (or
thereabouts) movie directed by Richard Brooks.
The movie is about the various contestants in a long
distance horse race.  And at that point it's based
on fact. There was a period of time (1890s ?...
1900s ?) when long distance horse races were all
the rage, with enormous prizes.  Anyway, it's a
GREAT movie, wonderful scenery, a touching story,
etc.  Some of the folks in it include Gene Hackman,
Candice Bergman, Ben Johnson, Dabney Coleman.
Check it out.

Stephen Miller
(in the heart of the lovely Texas hill country)
Pencom Software
smiller@pencom.com
From: "eliot gelwan" <eliot.gelwan@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: tail lights
Date: 12 Apr 92 02:52:57 EST
Reply-To: "eliot gelwan" <eliot.gelwan@channel1.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

On 04-11-92 MIKAEL KARLSSON wrote:

MKThe normal tail lights aren't bright enough so the film makers simply
MKswitch on the fog tail light. Most cars only have one of those.

In the US, cars don't have anything like a fog tail light.

                                         eliot 
Internet: eliot.gelwan@channel1.com
    RIME: ->CHANNEL [R/O okay]
---
 EZ 1.37B #178  [in Brookline MA  9:30 am, Saturday 04/11/92]
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA

Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:13738 rec.food.drink:1537
From: csroc@dime.prime.com (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.food.drink
Subject: Re: P.S. to SotL questions....
Date: 13 Apr 92 14:09:53 GMT
Reply-To: csroc@dime.UUCP (Charles Sroczynski x4014 5-2)
Organization: Prime Computervision, Bedford MA

>To my comment that Lecter, as a gourmet of some reputation, would have 
>preferred the wine Amarone (as Harris, the author, has him doing) to Chianti
>as an accompaniment to his meal of Pate de Census-taker Gras (OK, for the
>pedants: Pate d'officiel du Recensement Gras....???...oh, forget it!) I
>should add that Amarone as a much heavier red wine would be preferable to
>the lighter Chianti when partaking of such a strong taste as liver.

Joe,
   All serious wine buffs understand the difference
between Chianti and Amerone, however, methinks that
at least 95% of the American public(and the world)
has a much greater chnace of understanding the scene
with Chianti in place of Amerone.  I hadn't really
noticed (in the movie) that Lecter had a reputation
as a gourmet!  If the point was stressed and I 
overlooked it, I would then agree that this is an
obvious inconsistency.
From: isbell@ai.mit.edu (Charles L Isbell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Plug Pulled on Spike Lee's "Malcolm X"
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:01:52 GMT
	<1992Apr8.151046.15165@mahendo.jpl.nasa.gov>
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
In-reply-to: reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov's message of 8 Apr 92 15:10:46 GMT

Well, it should be obvious to anyone with a half a brain that a
good Malcolm X movie would need at *least* 3 hours to do anyone any
good.
--
Peace.
     "The US has a vital interest in that area of the country."
                -- Vice President Dan Quayle Referring to Latin America.
                           ------
Don't just adopt opinions |  \/  | I am Charles Isbell, Homeboy from hell,
      develop them.       |  /\  | living axiom and anonymous absolute ruler
                           ------  of the cosmos.  

Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:13122 rec.arts.sf.movies:3069 alt.cult-movies:3811
From: jess%miracle@merk.com (Shi'nayne)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: T2 - Why didn't Sarah die???
Date: 6 Apr 92 16:45:12 GMT
Article-I.D.: miracle.22iTiB2w164w
Organization: Miracle Computer Consultants

gberigan@cse.unl.edu (Life...) writes:

> 
> The "physically contact" thing though is strange.  Why not take the
> visual record and reform, and add the sound sample?
> 

Good question!  I don't know why they didn't just do that.  Maybe because
if the 1000 had to have physical contact with someone to assume their form,
it would be more  interesting?  Note: Except for Sarah, all the people whose
forms were assumed by the T-1000 died.  Maybe this is because if there were
two of a person running around every time the T-1000 assumed someone's form,
things would become too confusing perhaps??

Warrior Queen

> --
>   ///   ____   \\\       | CAUTION:
>   | |/ /    \ \| |       | Avoid eye contact.  In case of contact, flush
>    \\_|\____/|_//        | mind for 15 minutes.  See a psychiatrist if
>        \_)\\/            | irritation persists.  Not to be taken
> gberigan `-' cse.unl.edu | seriously.  Keep out of sight of children.


Vampire Hunters Inc.
jess%miracle@merk.com
If you have vampire problems, call!!  We'll
stake your problem right through the heart!!
From: jmgst26@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Joseph M Goodwin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Dead Again: Plot conflicts
Date: 15 Apr 92 05:42:23 GMT
Reply-To: jmgst26@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Joseph M Goodwin)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Univ. of Pittsburgh, Comp & Info Sys

Well, spoilers will follow


Ok, let me know if I've got this straight.  The theme of the movie is
getting revenge in another life.  All along, the hypnotist has his 
opportunity to kill Amanda, once he saw the picture in the paper.
Why didn't he?  Then he'd be free until the next lifetime :-)
Another theme is fate, and fate brought the two main characters
(played by Brannagh and his wife) back together, but why did she have 
memories that she was killed by her husband?  Are we to believe that 
the hypnotist could also employ mind control?  Lastly, why didn't 
Brannagh's character profess his innocence of the murder.  He seemed
to accept that fact that he had been convicted and he was going to his death.
I jus thought of another contradiction.  Amanda had memories of being stabbed by her husband before this hypnotist character entered the picture.

Confused?!

Mike Goodwin
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: craiga@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Craig R Albrechtson)
Subject: Re: Let's clear this T 101/800 thing up...
Organization: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems 
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 18:31:54 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.102832.23841@ms.uky.edu> nyberg@ms.uky.edu (Jack Nyberg) writes:
>   NERDS!!!NERDS!!!NERDS!!!
>

If you think these guys are bad you should go check out
rec.arts.movies.sf, there are some major geekoids there.
They have nothing to do except to endlesslessy  argue over
totally stupid and largly irrevelant points of the movies.
-- 
************************************************************************
* Craig Reese Albrechtson (Slider) * University of Wisconsin Milwaukee *
* The usual meanless disclaimers apply * craiga@csd4.csd.uwm.edu       *
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Lets clear this T 101/800 thing up.
From: rivero@mdcbbs.com
Date: 9 Apr 92 13:02:50 GMT
Organization: M&E (Division of EDS), Cypress CA
Nntp-Posting-User: rivero

In article <4596@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil>, jxxl@taurus.cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke) writes:
> u906789@bruny.cc.utas.edu.au (Mark Julian Turner) writes:
> 
>> >>Arnie is a Cyberdyne systems 800 series model 101.
> 
> Okay. Here's the skinny on Terminator III. Arnie will have to fend
> off personal attacks from a Cyberdyne systems 800 series model 426-1112.
> Watch out for it.
> 

   No, no, no! You've got it wrong. he fends off a Cyberdyne systems
model 120-A2, the same type that appeared in the first "ALIEN" movie
(the "twitchy" model).

  Criminy!  :)



<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|  Michael Rivero rivero@mdcbbs.com Homo Cyberneticus-Computational Man  |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gmcmanus@reepicheep.gcn.uoknor.edu (Gary McManus)
Subject: Re: THUNDERHEART
Organization: CIMMS/The University of Oklahoma, Norman
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 18:26:01 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.100031.5402@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> leeper@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Mark R. Leeper) writes:
>In article <1992Apr13.184204.14081@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> gmcmanus@reepicheep.gcn.uoknor.edu (Gary McManus) writes:
>> >At the end of the badger scene Jimmy Looks Twice disappears and in
>> >the back of the scene there is suddenly a deer jumping over a fence.
>> >This in a place where it would be uncommon normally for a deer to be.
>
>> Why would it be uncommon for a deer to be here?  I can see where the
>> implication could have been made, so I guess any opinion could be 
>> right.
>
>This conversation is starting to get into real trivia.  My impression
>is that deer tend to stick to wild areas and stay away from settled
>areas.  Particularly because that was not a highly-settled area, it
>would probably be unusual to see a deer that close to buildings.
>
Your impression?  My actual experience is that deer will go around    
buildings after they're used to them.  I'm from a small town in     
Oklahoma, grew up on a farm, and we would often have deer around
our outbuildings.  How's that for trivia?

Gary McManus
From: ung (Bill Ung)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Revenge of the Jedi
Date: 8 Apr 92 00:17:18 GMT
Reply-To: ung (Bill Ung)
Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA
Return-Path: <darnold>
Apparently-To: felix!postnews

As many of you know, the movies "Return of the Jedi" and "Star Trek II:The
Wrath of Khan" were originally titled "Revenge of the Jedi" and "Star Trek
II: The Revenge of Khan".  That is, until the movie studios saw the
similarity and decided one of them had to change.  Both ended up changing.

Now for my question, I have obtained a poster which depicts Darth Vader's
mask and a sillohette (sp?) of Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader engaged in
a battle with light sabers.  Below all this is the title "Revenge of the
Jedi".  Not "Return", "Revenge".

How much would one of these be worth?  Are they rare?

Please Email your answer, this newsgroup has too much traffic to sort
through and I have no desire to add to it.

Thanks,
Bill Ung
  ung@filenet.com
From: ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Review: SLEEPWALKERS
Date: 16 Apr 92 12:56:19 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <SBB.92Apr15224820@panix.com*> sbb@panix.com (The Phantom) writes:
*>In article <1992Apr14.171019.906@cbnewse.cb.att.com> gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart) writes:

*>   Jorge, I don't like to be put in the position of defending Mr. "Phantom",
*>   but here you come off somewhat defensively, and I'm assuming you didn't
*>   mean that.  Besides, I don't think you have to look very hard to find
*>   excuses to slam King.  And although there may be several aspects of
*>   "Phantom"'s reviews that are less than perfect, I don't think "Phantom"
*>   sounds like a fool.  Just made a mistake.  

*>How disturbing!  And here the Phantom thought his reviews were perfect
*>in every way...   :-)

*>The Phantom's term, "King-inspired" is correct.  He did not, however,
*>intend to convey the notion that the filmmakers were inspired by a
*>Stephen King story; instead, they seem to have been inspired by the
*>ability of King's name to bring in much more money than their loser of
*>a film would otherwise be able to make on its own merits.


OK.

I'm sorry, Phantom.  I guess my 'response' was a little harsh.
No point really in trying to explain myself.  I just went overboard.

My apologies.


-- 
Jorge Diaz                       | If winning is not important, then Commander,
Georgia Institute of Technology  |    why keep score?
Office of Information Technology | 
ccoprdj@prism.gatech.edu         |                     - Worf -
From: ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil (G. Host)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Darkman - Crap?
Date: 8 Apr 92 01:26:23 GMT
Reply-To: ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil (G. Host)
Organization: Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC


> Article <1992Apr06.005213.47381@datamark.co.nz> From: tfarmer@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Farmer)

> In article <vbljftc@lynx.unm.edu> lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble) writes:
> >tfarmer@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Farmer) writes:

> What I found was very similar to 'The Flash' in that it didn't grab my
> attention in any way - and was just plain boring. About halfway
> through the movie I realised what was 'wrong'. It was junk!

> I like comic book style movies (I enjoyed Robocop for its comic book
> style as well as its other side) but I prefer them to be done a whole
> lot better.


Funny you saay on the one hand that you like comic books movies
done tight and on the other hand the Flash was boring.

The Flash was done RIGHT by experienced comic and script author
Howard Chatkyn.  It was moody enough to make you think of in as
someplace else where normal laws don't apply, had in-jokes for
comic fans "Infantino Street", and in general was as good as you
will be able to get for the small screen.


Flash would have done much better on another night rather than
pairing off against the Simpsons & the Cosby Show.  It also
had the problem of getting on its feet with the day/time changes
and interuptions from news specials and CBS specials.

Don't let the ratings fool you - this show was done right!
-- 
Glenn Host - Senior Systems Analyst (ghost@ra.nrl.navy.mil)
NRL Code 5800, 4555 Overlook Ave.; Washington, DC 20375   (202) 767-2046
12307 Tigers Eye Court ; Reston, VA 22091                 (703) 620-1141
From: sb5i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Sandy Bodzin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Vanity in movies
Date: 13 Apr 92 17:28:03 GMT
Organization: Masters student, Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

My housemate and I have a bet.  He claims that Prince's ex, Vanity, has
never appeared in a broadly released movie while I claim that she has. 
However, I couldn't remember the movie.  Can anyone help.  Please email
as I am not a regular reader of this bboard.

Sandy
From: leeper@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Mark R. Leeper)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: THUNDERHEART
Date: 12 Apr 92 01:35:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: cbnewsj.1992Apr12.013534.7131
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Apr10.203932.13764@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> gmcmanus@reepicheep.gcn.uoknor.edu (Gary McManus) writes:

> First off, I loved the movie.

Well, that's one vote each way.  Actually, I think Evelyn pretty much
agrees with you.  On the other hand I have gotten three pieces of
e-mail and two agree with my assessment.

> I thought it did a great job of fusing humor with the rage
> these people must have been feeling.  I also believe the
> screenplay was based on a true story.

I think it is based on the killings of the two FBI agents and that is
about it.  At least that is my understanding.

> As for being done before, how many movies are TRULY
> original?  Just because it's been done doesn't degrade it's
> value.

Yes it does.  Some films can overcome that to do something a lot better
when it is done again.  But reusing rather than inventing is a fault
that has to be weighed in the balance pan.

[My disagreement with the film showing ghost dancers 

> But a lot of their culture (or what is left of it) is based
> on this "magic", as you call it.  What you don't realize is
> this was (and still is, for a lot of indians) their
> religion.  

C'mon.  Of course I realize that is is their religion.

> Don't you think when they watch something like
> the baptism scene in the Godfather that this appears like
> magic?  

No it doesn't.  There is nothing magical about what goes on on the
screen in GODFATHER.  It is just people dropping water on a baby.
There is nothing in that that requires a belief in the supernatural.
That could happen in the purely natural world.  That clearly is not
in the same category as ghost dancers appearing and disappearing or
the implication that a man has turned himself into a deer.  In
GODFATHER, if a wooden Jesus came off the cross and pushed Michael
Corleone out of the church, then I would have had the same
complaint.  It would have become a fantasy film.

> And as for defying the laws of physics, is that
> sort of like the parting of the Red Sea?  How about walking
> on water?

It sure is.  As far as I am concerned either action makes a film a
fantasy film.  That, in fact, was the whole point of the final scene
of BEING THERE.  BEING THERE was a fantasy film.  So was TEN
COMMANDMENTS, for that matter.  But it was a mistake for Apted to
make this a fantasy film.  It was much the same mistake that Tod
Browning made in FREAKS.  Browning spends the whole film pleading for
fair treatment for freaks, then in the final scene he makes them into
monsters with impossible powers.

				Mark Leeper
				...att!mtgzy!leeper
				(908)957-5619
From: jameskau@aludra.usc.edu (James Kaufman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Les Miserables movie??
Date: 15 Apr 1992 22:37:09 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

I heard that Les Miserables (the musical) is being filmed, and that it 
will be released next summer, and that Bruce Beresford replaced Alan Parker
as the director.  Does anyone know if there is any truth in that?  Does
anyone know what the cast will be like?  I heard that Michael Crawford would
play Jean Valjean, but that was a long time ago.
Thanks!
James Kaufman
jameskau@aludra.usc.edu
From: muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au (Murray Chapman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Nicol Williamson (Was Re: _Robin and Marian_)
Date: 16 Apr 92 01:11:46 GMT
Reply-To: muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au

In <1992Apr15.131706.7850@cbnewsc.cb.att.com> bwf@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (bernard.w.fecht) writes:

>>
>>Nichol Williamson - one of a great generation of British stage actors -
>>was in "The Human Factor", based on Graham Greene's novel.
>>

>He played Holmes in _The Seven Percent Solution_.
>He played Merlin in _Excalibur_.
>He played "a pretty strange dude" (the guy who claimed to have
>found the 5th gospel) in _The Word_ (made for TV).

>and yeah, he was wasted with the tooth paste in _Black Widow_.

I also have a recording of him reading Tolkien's "The Hobbit".  Excellent.

Murray Chapman
muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au
From: geoffb@coos.dartmouth.edu (Geoff Bronner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Point Break - Coherent?
Date: 7 Apr 92 19:05:41 GMT
Reply-To: geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU
Distribution: na
Organization: Amos Tuck School

In <1992Apr6.180908.28666@athena.mit.edu> kamorgan@athena.mit.edu (Keith Morgan) writes:

>Spoilers - 

>^L
Hmmm... Lets try a real ^L



>I saw the Keanu Reeves and Patrick Swayze movie _Point Break_ this
>weekend and I'm puzzled about both the timing and what I saw as a
>suddenly introduced character inconsistency. Has anyone else noticed
>this? 

Bit about timing deleted. Who cares?

>Second, the inconsistency is in Bodhi, the character played by Swayze.
>According to the FBI analysis of their robbery m.o. they are so
>successful at robbing banks because they're in and out and they never
>touch the vault. Well, in the last robbery they do rob the vault and
>chaos ensues.

You seemed to have missed a chunk of dialogue. The last robbery is
different because the Dead Presidents need some extra cash for travelling.
When Keanu Reeves' character realizes that they are changing the pattern
and going after the vault he basically tells Bodhi that they are going to
get nailed. He was right too.

>As well, their motivation for robbing banks is
>attributed by the FBI agent played by Gary Busey to their desire to
>have enough dough to go away for the winter to surf, and attributed by
>Bodhi to their desire to screw the system. So, why did Bodhi decide to
>go into the vault? This was over the objections of Presidents Nixon
>and Johnson as I recall. 

The presence of an FBI guy meant that they were running out of time and
would have to 'quit the business' for awhile (or maybe for good). More
money is better.

>Finally, why didn't he tell Rosie to let the
>woman go when he was in the plane? All of sudden he turns into a real
>hard case and this is somewhat at odds with the supposedly spiritual
>thrill seeker of the first part of the movie. So it seems to me that
>the missing 5 minutes might have had a scene that accounts for Bodhi's
>change of attitude. I really like Kathryn Bigelow as a director and
>think that problem resides with the screenplay.

Lets look at the scene in the plane. First, most of the Dead Presidents
are DEAD. That would change Bodhi's attitude pretty quickly I would think.
Also, he isn't stupid. As long as he holds the girl hostage he doesn't
have to worry about the FBI guy doing anything stupid. Reeves' character
passes up a couple chances to take out Bodhi in the plane for this reason.

Also... it was a good excuse for a well done parachute scene.

>'Nuff said. Any comments?

Watch the movie again.

-Geoff
--
geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU  -  Computing Support Technician, Tuck School of Business
Channel Z. All static, all |   "Great pate, mom, but I've gotta motor if I'm
day, forever. - The B-52's |    gonna make it to the funeral."   - Heathers
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Lester and Williamson (was Re: _Robin and Marian_)
Date: 15 Apr 92 22:56:45 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

I recieved the full answers to my two questions regarding the director 
and actor in _Robin and Marian_.  Thanks to all who answered.  Here
are the results:

>Good call.  Richard Lester did indeed direct THE THREE MUSKETEERS and THE FOUR
>MUSKETEERS (w Michael York, et al) as well as a few other great classics.  One
>of my favorite directors.

>Lester, Richard	Butch and Sundance: The Early Days
			Cuba
			Four Musketeers, The
			Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum, A
			Hard Day's Night, A
			How I Won the War
			Juggernaut (1974)
			Robin and Marian
			Royal Flash
			Superman III
			Superman II
			Three Musketeers, The (1974)

>Williamson, Nicol	Black Widow (1986)
			Excalibur
			Goodbye Girl, The
			Hamlet (1969)
			Human Factor, The (1979)
			I'm Dancing as Fast as I Can
			Return to Oz
			Robin and Marian
			Seven Percent Solution, The
			Venom
			Wilby Conspiracy, The
			"Word, The" (mini)

>Malcolm Austin
>maus@fid.morgan.com

So there you have it folks!  I can also recommend all of the above mentioned
"Lester swashbucklers": _Robin and Marian_, _Royal Flash_, _The Three
Musketeers_, and _The Four Musketeers_.

Another interesting point it that the same authour (George McDonald Frasier)
wrote the book that _Royal Flash_ is based on, and the screenplays to the
Musketeer films.

Greg Bole  bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll organize a revolt, exact a death for a death, and I'll never rest until
every Saxon in this shire can stand up free men and strike a blow for Richard
and England...From this night on I'll use every means in my power to fight you!
     Errol Flynn to Claude Rains in  _The Adventures of Robin Hood_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jpm56290@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Duner)
Subject: New James Bond?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 18:14:35 GMT

  I read somewhere that the director or producer of the Lethal Weapon films 
  wants or now has the rights or whatever to James Bond.  He said it's been a 
  dream of his to work on James Bond movies, 'cause he grew up with them.  
  Anyway, I read that he wants Mel Gibson to be James Bond.  What?!?!?!
  I don't think he would fit the role, 'cause for one thing he's not British.
  I think he could fake an accent, since he grew up in Australia, but still I 
  think it would be cheesy.  Has anyone else heard about this, or anyone have 
  any opinions?  


-- 
=====================================================
= John Meseke      email-jpm56290@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu  =
= "Some gals like to kiss my face.  Is it luck?"    =
==============================-Les Claypool==========
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies