HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mjheal@bnr.ca (Mary-Jane Heal)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Thanks everybody, its been fun
Keywords: Bye
Reply-To: mjheal@bnr.ca
Organization: BNR, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 13:51:26 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.125013.4293@watdragon.waterloo.edu>, mmpenner@rose.waterloo.edu (Mary Margaret Penner) writes:
|> I've been reading this newsgroup since I started my first CS major course
|> in September 1988.  I am going to miss reading it.  If I can access it
|> from the public sites in Ottawa, I'll be back, hopefully able to post more
|> since I don't have a job at the moment.  MJ, haven't seen anything from you
|> in a while, did you get stuck in a snow drift during the big snow storm
|> last week that I am sure you enjoyed immensely :-).  Maybe I should send
|> a search team out looking for you when I get home :-).
|> 

OK I seem to be having a problem getting to the outside world.  I think
the net.police have taken over our gateway. :( :(

So if anyone is reading this can you let me know.  PRETTY PLEASE!!!

|> 
|> Mary
|> 

MJ
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MJ Heal                   | Being married to Jack Deveraux is like cuddling
BNR, Ottawa, ON, Canada   | up with Chuckles the Clown and a depressed pit
mjheal@bnr.ca             |            bull at the same time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- DISCLAIMER:  Any opinions expressed are definitely not those of my     --
-- Employer and depending on flames received may not be even be my own.   -- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: rublee@liebnitz.ssd.kodak.com (Darrell Rublee)
Subject: Re: GL:  trivia-6
Organization: Eastman Kodak
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 17:37:44 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.145805.1155@usl.edu> drsres00@ucs.usl.edu (Schwartz Donald R) writes:
>hi!
>
>thanks to hilary, i have a BUNCH of questions -- although neither
>of us can take full credit for them (they come from a trivia game
>she sent me.)  feel free to send other questions if you choose....
>
>(yes, these are similar to sher's questions last year, but we'll see
>how it goes)
>
>1.  Who was the first person reick bauer slept with?
Claire Ramsey

>
>2.  who was lujack's half-brother?
Simon
>
>3.  what kind of surgery did dr. mark jarret perform on claire ramsey?
>
>4.  who placed dinah morgan with an adoption agency when she was a baby?
Ross?
>
>5.  who held alex, simon, and jesse matthews in captivity in san rios?
>
>6.  who was the first man vanessa was engaged to?
Ross Marler
>
>7.  name hb lewis' offspring.
Billy, Josh, Trish
>
>8.  on what special day did mindy lewis declare herself pregnant with
>    philip spaulding's child?
At Beth's wedding
>
>9.  why did cain harris kidnap reva?
>
>10. why did maeve tell kyle that their baby had been born dead?
So he would not take the baby away from her.

>

Thanks for the trivia, I enjoy it.
From: Dino.Ciccone@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Dino Ciccone)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Bold & the Beutiful info
Summary: I haven't seen this show in a whilE
Date: 16 Apr 92 13:21:41 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service


I was wondering if there is anyone out there that wound't mind sending me a 
update on the B&B story from the point they intodueced Faith
What happend to Eric ?
And why is he still with Brooke I thought she was putting up this front 
about not going to wrok and stuff so she could make him angry and then 
leave him.  Now he is with her still.
It would would be greatly appreciated if someone could give a quick 
review of what I have missed .


			DINO
					ciccone@vader.eng.uri.edu
Thanks

--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria)
Subject: Re: AMC:TAN MM - Round 1  
Organization: MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 15:45:40 GMT

In article <1992Apr2.025328.2041@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> marlowe@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Amanda T Marlowe) writes:
>Jeremy, darling, would you tell me what David was doing travelling
>with the art sculptures that are meant for those poor South American
>Hospitals? Phillip has generoulsy donated his work to them and I 
>want to know why David is involved. Is he planning to take them
>elsewhere? Or is he escorting them to South America? And why is
>he involved? 

Yes, Jeremy, I am interested in knowing more about this as well.
>
>Jackson, really. The telegram I refered to is the one we received this
>evening informing us Phillip was headed out of town. I just read it to
>everyone! He claims to have left some financial matters in your
>hands. Did he do this? If so, what matters was he refering to?
>I really think that you will have to over come your scruples in telling
>us. After all, the man has been murdered and we need as much information as
>we can get to help solve the mystery!

Ah yes, the telegram. Something is very odd about it. I must wait until
after the murderer is found out before I can divulge any financial details
of the Foundation. We will have to deal with one thing at a time.  As you
know I was left in charge of "all" financial matters and will discuss them
with you when the time is right, Phoebe! 
>
>Brooke, dear - About your car. What exactly was wrong with the brakes?
>I am afraid someone might have been trying to kill you as well, since
>they found brake cable with Phillip's body. I am afraid that
>whoever killed Phillip might have also wanted you out of the way. Can you
>think of anything that might be dangerous to someone else?
>And why were you having lunch with Adam? I find it hard to believe
>that you would associate with him for pleasure.

>Phoebe

Brooke, I am also concerned about you. What information do your files
you contain? You must tell us! If you are in trouble of some sort, I
really think we ought to know. 

Jackson
From: shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Another scenario for Carly
Date: 13 Apr 92 20:42:59 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

dian@cs.caltech.edu (Dian De Sha) writes:


>First I wondered if Danielle could be the half sister of Katerina, 
>born to the Von Lochner maid and fathered by her employer (K's dad).

>That still seems possible, but I now suddenly wonder if perhaps Dani's
>mother, the maid, switched the two girls at birth to give her daughter
>(Katerina) a better life, and then stayed on to watch her child grow
>up in the wealthy household.  Then when she got fired (perhaps for `
>Dani's childish theft), and thus prevented from watching over her
>own daughter, she got vengeful and turned Dani to getting even by 
>ripping off the Alamains and Von Lochners, thus, creating Romulus.
>Perhaps the literary allusion of Romulus and Remus is referring to
>Dani and Carly, and they chose females just to throw us off the track.

Okay, add that to the theory that Viv and Herr Von Loichner are
Lawrence's parents and you have the perfect escape from the
incest baby problem.

First we'll think that Max is the incest baby of Lawrence and 
Carly, then we find out that Carly isn't a Von Loichner at all,
but Dani is.  Great!

I think we should write this show.



-- 
Susan R. Hagan (shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu) 
Publications Coordinator - User Services
Rutgers University Computing Services
From: mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL:  John and the codices
Keywords: post from a lurker
Date: 16 Apr 92 12:40:36 GMT
Organization: AT&T

Mona doesn't have posting ability so I'm putting this up for her.  Please
change attribution lines if you respond..........

In article <15APR199213343386@jetson.uh.edu> you write:
>
>Yeah, I know that I shouldn't expect continuity from a soap, but there's
>a major continuity problem with this Dani is Romulus solution.  Remember
>when the codices were stolen, and the calling card of Romulus was left??
>Now, if we are to believe that Danielle is Romulus, she traveled from
>Switzerland to Salem, stole the codices and somehow lost them to Lawrence,
>travelled back to Switzerland, saw the picture of John in the paper, and
>finally decided to come back to Salem to find John.  Somehow, I don't think
>this is very plausible.  However, if Dani didn't steal the codices, then
>why was the Romulus calling card left??  Unless maybe Lawrence stole them
>and just wanted to make it look like Romulus (who he thought was John) was
>the culprit.  Confused???  I know I am.  Am I missing something???  Can
>anyone help me??  (Don't answer that, I probably don't want to know!!:-))

My theory about the codices is that it was the last set of writers
who came up with and wrote that storyline and we will never hear
of it again.  I guess that isn't really a theory, but with all the
inconsistencies in the John Stevens storyline I think that is the
only logical explanation.

I don't even care about the codices anymore, as long as they hurry
up this stupid storyline.  Do we really care who Romulus is anymore
anyway?

Here's my theory on the who John Black is.  Remember in the bag
John got from Stephano (not).  There was a picture of Carly
in it.  Everything else seems to point to him being Forrest,
but if that is true why the picture of Katarina.  I think that
Lawrence isn't really Lawrence Alemain.  John is actually Lawrence
and Larry is either Forrest or he is Viv's son.  How else could
the picture of Katarina that was in the bag fit in?  Viv was
responsible for or involved with the switch of the two.  Of course,
that would explain whey they wanted to erase Larry's early child-
hood memories as well as John's.  I hope this is true for a few
reasons.

1.  It would totally throw several lives for a loop.
2.  It would solve the who is he storyline.
3.  John looks ~5 years older than Larry so the aging
    would be more believable then if John was Forrest.
4.  It would make some of the "forgotten pieces" fit to-
    gether better.

mona@scubed.scubed.com

Tim is posting this for me cause I can't post so if you want to
reply by mail please use my E-mail address and not his.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
|  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
|  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |
From: peterson@nicmad.uucp (Dennis Peterson x2495)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: AMC: April Fools Update
Date: 7 Apr 92 23:26:10 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Nicolet Instrument Corp.

Could someone please e-mail me the April Fools update everyone has been 
raving about.  For some reason this did not come through on my system, but
then I seem to miss a some of the discussion.  Can anyone tell me if they have
seen any of my posts lately?  This system has been acting funny again.


Patricia



 -- 
---Dennis Peterson

    Compuserve 70244,412@compserve.com
    UUCP: uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!peterson
Internet: nicmad!peterson%astroatc.uucp@spool.cs.wisc.edu
-- 

 -- 
---Dennis Peterson
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: stapleto@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Kathy Stapleton)
Subject: DOOL -- Friday (4/10)
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 05:30:20 GMT

     I know I've been ranking a lot on Bo recently, but it's not the
actor -- just his darned character!!!  Did anyone catch when he was
asking Carly what was wrong...and he did an Ick line.  "Don't shut me
out!!!  You know I'd understand!!!"

     That baby shower was nicely done -- with all of those comments
made by each of the mothers.  but I am getting soooooooo sick of
Carlee and her flashbacks?  Haven't TPTB bombarded us with ENOUGH of
those sickening flashbacks???  As if we're all stupid to not know
about this pregnancy.

     Ooooooooooooohhhhhhhhh, that burns me up now....esp in those
previews for Monday....Danielle is just "in it" with JOhn for the
MONEY?!?!?!?  And the JEWELS??!?!?!?!?!!?  So I guess that means that
she really doesn't love John....maybe just used him as a toy to get
what he wants...which is why when he opened the safety deposit box she
was going to kill him???  ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH...  But I'm
confused...didn't it say in the previews that "John was onto Danielle
in the first place..  He knows she is Romulus."  Whatever.  ARGH!!!!!
That's all I have to say...for now.

     Grapefruit... heading for the weekend.... :)


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: riddle@brahms.udel.edu (Tammy Laird)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Tanner & Chip (was DOOL--Molehill)
Date: 8 Apr 92 12:32:39 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

In article <rtp6qINNgrr@agate.berkeley.edu> sally@eris.berkeley.edu (S. A. Wilson) writes:
>
>SORRY, but I was talking about the actor whom I feel is not into
>his role. And thus I feel that the character suffers. Give me
>the Chipman anyday, as my half-, or is it step-sis Lemon said, the man
>who portrays Chip is more excited about his part, and this his
>character, which comes through in his acting. And for me this
>makes a better character since then the acter puts more into the
>role, gives it more dimension. Yes my former paramour--oh I remember
>the good old days, listening to R.E.M. and hum 8-) )  )--Timinator
>is right about Tanner. Unfortunately what he says about Cousin
>Vern, is off the mark, and the reason we broke up.
>
>Spud--the middle, and mentally destrubed Peel sister.
>-- 
>A Book of Verses underneath the Bough,   ||  Sally A. Wilson
>A Jug of Wine, A Loaf of Bread--& Thou   ||  Potato "Salad" Peel
>  Beside me singing in the Wilderness--  ||  sally@mica.berkeley.edu
>Oh, Wilderness were Paradise enow! (The Rubaiyrat of Omar Khayyam)



Spud, I agree with you about Michael Easton, and have proof to back you up
(as if you needed backed up :-).  If anyone as seen this past weeks SOD,
you will understand exactly were Spud is coming from.  There is a picture
in the back (I think) of SOD that shows some of the sexy men on DOOL--it
has to do with a contest that SOD and DOOL are holding.  Anyway, Michael
Sabitino, Matt Ashford, Robert Mailhouse, etc. are holding RKK lengthwise
in the air, however, at the end of this handsome line is Michael Easton.
He looks totally bored, and he is not even involved in the picture.  He is
staring off in a different direction, hands in his pocket, and not even
attempting to become involved.  I have always like Michael Easton, probably
something to do with how much he looks like the Baldwins :-), but this
picture really turned me off.  Granted, there could be any number of
reasons why he didn't want to be involved, but I feel he is being paid to
do a job, and that includes PR work, too.  BTW, how many people on the net
have or are going to enter the DOOL Sexy Men contest?


--Peach Pit
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: sylvia+@cs.cmu.edu (Sylvia Berry)
Subject: Re: Lorna's parents
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 17:14:47 GMT
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Distribution: na
Keywords: Lorna, Felicia, Lucas, Cass, Carl Hutchins





In article <Apr.14.11.07.32.1992.541@gandalf.rutgers.edu> shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan) writes:
>v069qppf@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Jen) writes:
>
Stuff deleted
>
>Interesting, but not possible.  Felicia and Cass were together much later.
>After her marriage to Carl Hutchins ended.  Their whole relationship was
>played out on the show.  They had no past that the viewers didn't see.
>Even if they did have a child, it would only be a teenager now by now.
>
more stuff deleted
>-- 
>Susan R. Hagan (shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu) 
>Publications Coordinator - User Services
>Rutgers University Computing Services

Is is possible Carl knew all the time that Lorna was Felicia and Lucas's
child and this is another way he secretly got back at Bay City's finest?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: GC.AVW@forsythe.stanford.edu (RAGIN CAJUN)
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: Marital Names
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 09:08:48 GMT

In article <9204111157.AA03020@mozart.UUCP>,
hilary@mozart.b17b.ingr.com (Hilary E. H. Perkins) writes:
>Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
>Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: Marital Names
>References: <92100.134150SECBU@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> <1992Apr10.141239.6738@news.media.mit.edu> <1992Apr10.170559.18946@cco.caltech.edu>
>Distribution: na
>Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
>
>In article <1992Apr10.170559.18946@cco.caltech.edu> cathy@seismo.gps.caltech.edu (Cathy Smither) writes:
>
>>I agree -- I kept my name after we got married, partly because I
>>already had a few papers published under that name, and partly
>>because I like it.  I considered hyphenating it, but I really
>
>Well when I was married before (in a previous life :) ), I tried
>to hyphenate, mostly as a comprimise to my then-husband.  Speaking
>as someone who tried it, I would NOT recommend hyphenating.  You
>end up with this unwieldy last name, that is a major pain.  Think
>about how many times you have to spell your name - leaving phone
>messages, filling out forms, etc.  The world is just not equipt
>to handle a hyphenated name (IMHO)!
>
>
>Hilary
>--

Sorry for deleting so much but I just wanted to agree with some of
what you said and didn't want you to have to re-read what you wrote
:^) anyway my maiden name was Vaughn and like you I tried to
hypenate-unfortunately what came out sounded much too German and
everyone thought it was Von Woolf not Vaughn-Woolf

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
<>Alma Woolf-Ahwoooo-I mean baa-baa-<>
<>Sam the Sham and the Pharaohs<><><>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
From: dcannon@bach.udel.edu (Debbie Cannon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Janet's Due Date
Date: 17 Apr 92 13:32:50 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Delaware

In article <1992Apr16.171922.7842@unx.sas.com> alex@donne.unx.sas.com (Alexandra Bost) writes:
> 2.  Janet will be revealed as Will's killer in May (which we already
>     know is Patrick Stuart's last on-camera appearance, thus wrapping 
>     up the murder mystery).  The trauma will cause her to go into 
>     premature labor.

And according to this week's Star -- my hubby's weekly
purchase at the grocery store, not mine :-) -- the
actual date for Will's killer to be revealed is: MAY 11.
[Hey, Mary, that's a Monday!!]

TGIF and may the Easter bunny bring you LOTS of goodies!!

Debbie


============================================================
Debbie Cannon			    					
University of Delaware			IT'S
CNS User Services		      FRIDAY!!!!!
015 Smith Hall
Newark, DE 19716
e-mail: dcannon@bach.udel.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jcj@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (j.johnk)
Subject: Re: SB: Need Old Update
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 16:18:41 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.111803.14177@bogart.uucp> cjaeger@bogart.uucp (Cecilia Jaeger) writes:
>Hi Everyone,
>
>	Well somehow are connection to the Net has been down for weeks. I am
>glad it is back. I know I missed some great talk. 

Welcome back Ceci, we missed you.

>
>	Will the Net was down I was in the process of moving into my first
>house. :-) So, in the process of moving I forgot to set the VCR and I missed
>Santa Barbara on Monday March 30.  Please someone tell me what happen at the
>rest of the reunion and what (please please) happened with Cassie, Angela and
>Warren. I've been dying to know. I couldn't get to the net. If you can't give
>me a complete update, just summarize the Cassie, Angela and Warren storyline.

All this took place in somekind of closet at the high school while
the reunion was still going on.
Cassie had some fake (at least we think they were fake) newspaper articles
made up that said stuff like "Sister murdered her own sister".
Anyway, Angela said that she was driving and Marilyn was in the back
seat passed out.  Her and David got lost in the moment and Angela
wasn't watching the road.  Anglea and David thought Marilyn had
swam to the surface, but she was too drunk and swallowed alot
of water and drowned.  Angela kept saying she killed her own
sister, David was there and said it was an accident.  After
this, Minx took Cassie home and Angela shut Warren out for a few
days thinking that he would leave her.  But she fell off a ladder
and came to her senses.  (Actually she had a dream that Marilyn
told her she forgave her and Angela must forgive herself).
Cassie is at Minx's feeling sorry for herself.

There is probably some stuff missing, but I hope this helps.
>
>
>		Thanks in Advance
>	
>			Ceci "the homeowner" 

Good Luck with you're new house.
Joyce

>-- 
>C. Jaeger  IRS - Washington DC                  
>Internet: cjaeger@bogart.UUCP  
>UUCP: ..uunet!media!ka3ovk!irscscm!bogart!cjaeger
>Ladies and Gentlemen: Take my advice pull down your pants and slide on the ice.
>				Sidney Freeman - M*A*S*H
From: v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Michelle L. Zafron)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AW:  Lorna
Date: 5 Apr 92 19:34:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr2.182312.12304@b15.b15.ingr.com>, lynn@b15.b15.ingr.com (Lynn Lee) writes...
>I almost felt sorry for Lorna, Tuesday.  She really gave an honest effort
>in trying to get the tape back.  I mean it's still her fault that the tape
>got there in the first place, but she should receive a little sympathy
>for trying.

My feelings on Lorna have developed a 180 degree turn.  When she first came on,
I used to get nauseous.  Now, her appearance will keep me glued to the set, even
if Jensen B is doing Vicki and the Coffee Achiever is being self-righteous.

>You know, Matt keeps carrying on about her obsession with Jenna, but he
>just recently told Lorna that he loved her.  He always carries on about 
>Jenna and never tells Lorna about how he feels about her.  I think I might
>feel a little bit jealous too, if I was in Lorna's shoes.  Of course, I
>wouldn't go to the extreme that she did.  Oh, who am I kidding? Yes I would!
>If I was in love with this guy and all he talked about (and his family too
>for that matter) was this naive, innocent girl, then I might go to these
>extremes, too.

I can understand Lorna's actions; they were wrong and foolish, but she did them
in the heat of the moment; she's sorry; and she did try to correct them.

Actually, Jenna and Dean are annoying me more than ever.  I particularly liked 
it (NOT) when Jenna was talking to Lorna about how now men are treating her like
a slut and calling her suggestive names.  And Lorna saying she'd been there 
before.  Then sweet little Jenna suggests that maybe Lorna asked for it.

Later we have Dean freaking out because his convent school girl has been seen by
all the world and Jenna asking quite shocked: "Do you think I asked for it?"

Can we say Double Standard, boys and girls?  I knew we could.  And I think 
that's partially what motivated Lorna.  Everybody loves Jenna.  She can do no
wrong.  Matt keeps talking about her as the classic perfection of a woman.  And
to the best of Lorna's knowledge, Jenna just made a porn tape.  I also just love
how everyone assumes that Lorna should have known instantly that the tape was
a set-up.  

>Oh, well.  And to think I once hated Lorna.  I'm glad she is no longer 
>leaving the show.

>Lynn

--Michelle L. Zafron (v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Suppose that you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress.  But
 I repeat myself."
                                 --Mark Twain   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------