From: vanyel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alan Williams)
Subject: Re: Too straight looking to be gay
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: usa
Date:  2 Sep 92 01:14:40 GMT

In <1992Sep2.000759.22319@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> ry@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (ryerson.schwark) writes:
>In article <vanyel.715386757@camelot> vanyel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alan Williams) writes:
>>Credibility, like anything else on the planet, is subjective.  I've
>>discussed this situation with a lot of people, including some who read the
>>net.  It's amazing how many of them agree with me on this....
>The world is full of people who don't think.

Yes.  You're one of them, obviously.

>>>What is it Voltaire said? "I may not agree with a word you say, Sir,
>>>but I will defend to the death your right to say it"?
>>Doesn't work with this crowd, Bob.
>What utter bullshit.  You have every right to be stupid and caught up
>in ridiculous gender roles.  You do *NOT* have the right not to get
>called stupid for being stupid.  Some of us have been around here for
>a while and whining that other people agree with you, and that you
>have a right to your opinion doesn't cut it.  Either defend your
>position, bow out of the discussion, or admit your wrong, but QUIT
>WHINING that you're not allowed to have your opinion when it has been
>demonstrated here that you're allowed to have your opinion.

Whining.  Whining.  Is it "whining" only when someone reacts to your
bullshit?  When you decide you don't like something and deride it beyond
logical boundaries, is *that* whining?  Apparently not.

>If you don't want to think about the implications of your arguments,
>nobody here is making you.  I've spoken to a bunch of people who
>think you're a total ninny (now there, wasn't that persuasive!)

Well, they're *obviously* as "wrong" as you claim "my bunch" is.

>All that being said, perhaps you have some points, but they're being
>lost in all your whining.  Try thinking before your next post, or
>maybe you should replace the light bulb in your brain with a higher
>wattage.  

>(Who remembers getting properly nailed by steve on NAMBLA, but at least
>I had the decency to say I was wrong.)

Oh, fuck off.  Frankly, I think you're a member of a subset of pathetic whiners
pointing accusing, condemning fingers at anyone who doesn't accept your drivel
as the Word of God.  Scorn seems to be your weaponry, as do a set of double
standards that makes everything you do justifiable, while flaming others
because if they don't agree with you they can't possibly be right.  Why
don't you shut your trap for a change and listen to what someone else has
to say, instead of trying to engage in a Usenet "shouting match" to try and
drown out those who deign to disagree?

I don't like "nelly" behavior.  Period.  I've received nothing on here to
suggest that I *should*--only flames for not thinking like *you*.  When
I've tried to support my position and clarify it further, it's
"backtracking."  If I bring anything up regarding *your* unwillingness to
hear what *I* have to say, I'm a "whiner."  I suggest you pick up a mirror,
Ry.  And while you're out getting that mirror, take your one-sided my-word-
is-law bullshit with you.

--

 _______________ Alan Williams | vanyel@camelot.bradley.edu _________________
 \/ "Are you afraid I'm jeopardizing my secret identity, Ned?  I don't     \/
     *have* one, remember?"  --The Black Condor, _Black Condor_ #5
Newsgroups: soc.motss