HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: adammot@ltrnativ.UUCP (Adam Mottershead)
Newsgroups: alt.rap
Subject: 'Deep Cover'
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 08:26:26 EST
News-Software: FSUUCP 1.2 R4
X-Mailer: DigiQR 5.38b
Reply-To: adammot@ltrnativ.UUCP (Adam Mottershead)
Distribution: world
Organization: The All Ter Nah Tive Un Der Groend

This is some what of an old request, but I thought I would ask anyways.  What
I am looking for is the lyrics to the title cut of Deep Cover, by Dr. Dre.

I hadn't heard the song for awhile, 'til I saw it on tape recently.

If you can send them to me or post them in the newsgroup, it will be much
appreciated.

--
Adam Mottershead                      |
39 Havelock Drive                     |        adammot@ltrnativ.UUCP
Brampton, Ontario                     |                 or     
Canada, L6W 4K8                       | adammot%ltrnativ.UUCP@uunet.uu.net
+1 416 454 8597                       |
                                                                            --
From: doc@webrider.central.sun.com (Steve Bunis)
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes
Subject: Re: filter feeders
Date: 21 Dec 1992 17:17:03 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: doc@webrider.central.sun.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: webrider.central.sun.com

In article 1h2oqfINNpdq@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu, eam13@po.CWRU.Edu (Elizabeth A. Madigan) writes:

> 
> In a previous article, doc@webrider.central.sun.com (Steve Bunis) says:
> 
> >Zebra Mussels!  Caught one of the little buggers on a rock I pulled off
> >the bottom while trolling (It's sitting on my desk now as a paper weight
> >with Zebra Mussel in place).  Hadn't heard about the pollution cleaning 
> 
> He found ONE zebra mussel!  We have them by the foot here on the
> beaches of Lake Erie.  They run the length of the beach and are
> usually 3 foot wide.  These are just the shells of the little devils.
> The other problem that I have heard about the zebra mussels is that
> they also eat the zooplankton that the rest of the food chain depends
> on as well.  
> 
> Liz
> 

Catching them on the beach is too easy!  You've got to go after them
with rod & reel.   :^)

They are definitely causing alot of deserved attention.  I have several
boat owning friends who are almost in a panic about how to keep them 
from munching their motors (clogging intakes etc.)   Love it when
people introduce new species into the ecosystem.  Anyone for rabbit 
hunting in australia?

Steve
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 12:58:36 EST
From: <JMB113@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes
Subject: re:filterfeeders

The  adult mussels are sessile, however the larvae are planktonic and in fact c
ould attach to just about anything (and do).

                                            JMB
From: james.williams@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us (James Williams) 
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes
Subject: great lakes region
Date: 31 Dec 92 22:01:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: HAL 9000 BBS, W-NET HQ, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Reply-To: james.williams@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us (James Williams) 

Washinton SUCKS and Ottawa Blows!
Now what can we in the middle do???
                                                          
----
+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| HAL 9000 BBS +1 313 663 4173 or 663 3959 | Four 14.4k v.32bis dial-ins |
| Public Access QWK-to-Usenet gateway      | With PCBoard 14.5aM & uuPCB |
+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
From: james.williams@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us (James Williams) 
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes
Subject: MACHUS RED FOX
Date: 31 Dec 92 22:06:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: HAL 9000 BBS, W-NET HQ, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Reply-To: james.williams@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us (James Williams) 

Yer Ryt
Names Changed to protenct the guilty
                                                                                   
----
+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| HAL 9000 BBS +1 313 663 4173 or 663 3959 | Four 14.4k v.32bis dial-ins |
| Public Access QWK-to-Usenet gateway      | With PCBoard 14.5aM & uuPCB |
+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes
From: jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist)
Subject: Re: filter feeders
Organization: INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation, Naperville, IL
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:39:50 GMT

In article <1gsrheINN4hd@cronkite.Central.Sun.COM> doc@webrider.central.sun.com writes:
>Zebra Mussels!  Caught one of the little buggers on a rock I pulled off
>the bottom while trolling (It's sitting on my desk now as a paper weight
>with Zebra Mussel in place).  Hadn't heard about the pollution cleaning 
>aspects of the little critters, though I had heard something about them
>being ground up for a great fertilizer.

Yikes!

If the ZM's are as good at filtering polluted water as I've heard, do
we _really_ want to grind them up and scatter them across the countryside???


-- 
Jonathan E. Quist                              INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation
jeq@i88.isc.com  '71 CL450-K4 "Gleep", DoD #094        Naperville, IL
                Celebrate the winter holiday of your choice by
                  offering your hand to someone who needs it.
From: Chuck.Cole@f78.n282.z1.tdkt.kksys.com (Chuck Cole)
Sender: FredGate@tdkt.kksys.com
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes
Subject: great lakes region
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 09:12:22 -0600

Hello steve hartwell (1:282/31),

In ALT.GREAT.LAKES on <Dec 21 04:12> to All, you wrote:

 sh>  If this newsgroup is not a proper medium to bring up a political
 sh>  discussion, would someone please politely inform of that, and I 
 sh> will  re-direct to some other newsgroup.

This is NOT the proper forum for a sophomoric political discussion.  I'd bet
that the Chamber of Commerce of Gary Indiana would be very receptive to your
goals and would sponsor a forward-looking newsgroup to deal with these issues.
From: 9072falkk@vms.csd.mu.edu (Kathy Falk)
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes
Subject: MaNchus Red Fox v. Machus Red Fox
Date: 31 Dec 1992 15:13:39 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 9072falkk@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

In recent reviews of the movie Hoffa, the restaurant which Jimmy Hoffa last
frequents is identified as the Manchus Red Fox.  As I remember it, that
establishment was part of a group run by the MACHUS corporation.  Can
someone in southeastern Michigan verify or refute my recollection?

Thanks much!

Kathy Falk
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
(formerly from Port Huron and East Lansing, Michigan
From: james.williams@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us (James Williams) 
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes
Subject: Re: filter feeders
Date: 31 Dec 92 21:59:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: HAL 9000 BBS, W-NET HQ, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Reply-To: james.williams@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us (James Williams) 

The Zebra Mussel filters about 1 gallon per da7y each.
So the entire volume of lake Erie may be filtered every 30 days.
The Zebras may do a good job removing pollutants, but they also remove
the food of fresh water clams, minnows and other wanted species.
AKA some good, some bad lots of ugly!!!
Jim
                                                                                    
----
+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| HAL 9000 BBS +1 313 663 4173 or 663 3959 | Four 14.4k v.32bis dial-ins |
| Public Access QWK-to-Usenet gateway      | With PCBoard 14.5aM & uuPCB |
+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
From: mstemper@ems.cdc.com (Michael Stemper)
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes
Subject: Re: great lakes region
Date: 22 Dec 92 18:59:56 GMT
Reply-To: mstemper@ems.cdc.com
Distribution: alt
Organization: Empros Systems International, a division of Ceridian

In article <1992Dec20.4627.1034@dosgate>, steve.hartwell@canrem.com (steve hartwell) writes:

> Hi All in the Great Lakes Region. I've been reading this newsgroup
> for a few months, and you seem like an interesting, polite bunch.

Thank you.

> I was wondering how you all feel about the two Federal capitals,
> Ottawa in Ontario, Canada, and Washington D.C. in the U.S.

Would you like to switch?

> Do you feel that the Great Lakes Region is properly represented by
> these two nation-state Government system seats. ?

Well, D.C. doesn't represent the rest of the country very well, why
should we expect it to represent us?

> Do you think that Ottawa and Washington respect our needs, our
> concerns, our economy, our Region ? Do they do a proper job of
> helping us with our Environmental problems in the Great Lakes ?

Let's secede! We'll take all of the states that border on the Great
Lakes, along with Ontario, and form our own country! But - you have
to find a way to make Quebec take Ottawa. They deserve each other :->

What should we call our new nation, under water?

a. United Lakes of America
b. Lakesylvania
c. Greatistan
d. Superior

a. probably wouldn't play too well in Thunder Bay. b. could easily be
confused with a real lake in the U.P. c. sounds awful. I vote for
"Superior".

The next time sombody from Texas or Arizona proposes building a pipeline
to use our lifeblood (the Lakes) to irrigate their desert, we can say
"Let them drink oil." I like it! Or, we could offer them a trade: one
gallon of water for one gallon of oil. See who runs out first.

Other thoughts?

-- 
#include <Standard_Disclaimer.h>
Michael F. Stemper
Power Systems Consultant
mstemper@ems.cdc.com
From: jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist)
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes
Subject: Re: filter feeders
Date: 21 Dec 92 19:39:49 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation, Naperville, IL

In article <1h4u6fINN70m@cronkite.Central.Sun.COM> doc@webrider.central.sun.com writes:
>[Zebra mussles] are definitely causing alot of deserved attention.
>  I have several
>boat owning friends who are almost in a panic about how to keep them 
>from munching their motors (clogging intakes etc.)   Love it when

Uh, am I missing something here, or are your friends dragging their motors
on the bottom?  I thought clams and mussles means of locomotion generally
restricts them to jet propulsion along the bottom of the lake or river...

Oh, when your friends pull their boats out of the water, they _do_ check
for the mussles and remove them, don't they?  Or do they carry them
to other bodies of water and introduce them there?
-- 
Jonathan E. Quist                              INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation
jeq@i88.isc.com  '71 CL450-K4 "Gleep", DoD #094        Naperville, IL
                Celebrate the winter holiday of your choice by
                  offering your hand to someone who needs it.
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 22:06:32 GMT
Subject: Re: Fecal Greaseballs? Joking, right?
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: alt.great-lakes

Robin, yes I have heard of this group and contributed money.  I think 
there was some airplay on the founder on the news one night.  

I used to surf from K38.5 to tressle's a long time ago (circa 1973)
and I used to see floating curtains of slimish stuff that was 
everywhere in the water... It always scared me... they were'nt 
turds, or oil... I used to also surf northside Scripps Institute..

There were always marine biologists working at the pier and we'd walk
up and ask if it was safe to surf that day.. They of course were
young post-graduates or full professors and were sympathetic...

However, unless people form groups like Surfriders, (subversive 
environmentalist scum) there really isnt any way to stop it..

I know Surfrider has contributed significantly to some issues 
regarding clean water and beaches.. 

Good luck Robin.

all disclaimers apply


Xref: sparky alt.dads-rights:3046 soc.men:21566
From: alyoung@kiwi.ucs.indiana.edu (Amy Young Leith)
Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights,soc.men
Subject: Re: Divorce woes
Date: 21 Dec 92 15:37:42 GMT
Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington

In article <BzFFrD.JIr@SSD.intel.com> joel@ssd.intel.com (Joel Clark) writes:

>Lisa, once a couple with kids decides to split (the subject at hand) there 
>is no more chance for WIN-WIN relationship.  Everybody, mother, father, 
>children are going to lose something. While you are still trying to WIN 
>in such a situation you are only making it worse for everybody.

You lose a living arrangement with someone you obviously don't get
along with anymore.  Is that a loss?  Parents who are working TOGETHER
for the good of the children should not lose the relationship with the
children.  But that's the key... WORKING TOGETHER. 

One of the main problems that I see is that we are exiting an era
where women almost across the board depended upon men.  For
everything.  If you had kids, that's all you had, the rest was his.
In these situations, I think that men ARE obligated to support their
children, if they want to continue to be a parent.  

These days, I think it's STUPID for any person, regardless of gender,
to be dependent upon another person for their very existance in such a
way.  Some men are scum, some women are bitches, and I can't honestly
believe that you wouldn't really know that by the time you decide to
marry someone.  If you don't, then should you really be marrying
someone you hardly know?  

Wait a minute, I'm getting off track. 

As for win-win, you have to look at the situation AT HAND, not the
past.  If you are in a relatinship where you no longer care or can no
longer function with your mate, something has to be done.  It can be a
win-win situation, each person going their own way, providing for the
children *where needed*, sharing the responsability of parenting, and
being civil with someone that, at one time, you deemed worthy of
pledging sincerity to for the rest of your life.  To do otherwise, and
attempt to hurt the person, will in the end hurt a lot more people
than just that person.  Can someone *really* feel good about that? 

amy

-- 
alyoung@kiwi.ucs.indiana.edu for personal mail
			    All business mail to alyoung@silver.ucs.indiana.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Dislcaimer:I only speak for myself.  Anyone who thinks differently is a fool.
			(This means NOT my employer!!)
Xref: sparky alt.dads-rights:3076 alt.child-support:4031
From: yasu@ll.mit.edu (Alan Yasutovich)
Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights,alt.child-support
Subject: Re: Itemized accounting of child support
Date: 22 Dec 92 12:28:10 GMT
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory

In article <BzMDI4.Fvt@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
>In article <1992Dec20.085201.6296@desire.wright.edu> sbishop@desire.wright.edu writes:
>>{_In article <1h0k4aINN32a@gap.caltech.edu>, peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
>>> karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger) writes:
>
>>> This would not allow the CP to save any of the chilld support for college!
>>> Actually, depending on how you define "immediately", it may disallow the 
>>> CP from salting away money for child-related emergencies, or Christmas
>>> presents, or a bicycle, etc.
>>
>>Ah, but Michal, both Alan and Bob consider anything except money paid for
>>immediate basic minimal needs as luxury!  So, salting money away for a 
>>bicycle (an HUGE luxury item in their eyes), or *gasp* college is a waste
>>of THEIR precious funds.
>
>Who's Bob?
>
>
>>And, yes, this is a flame.  And, yes, this is a fairly accurate description
>>of their position.
>
>"Fairly accurate?"  Apart from your inability to distinguish
>three-letter names...  Child-related emergencies can be covered 
>by insurance (provided by the NCP!) -- or will you now say that
>a CP might have to buy an emergency bicycle or pony or condo in Florida?
>
>
>In Pennsylvania, a NCP is not obligated to pay for college.
>Thus, even the *law*, which you so religiously like to invoke,
>says that college is not a basic need.
>
>There should be no LEGAL obligation to pay for college or to
>pay child support that includes money to be saved for college.
>Married parents are not legally required to pay for college.
>
>Are you going to pay for your foster son's college education 
>all by yourselves, Sue?


	Of couese not!  She only proudly raises kids that *other*
	people pay for.  That's why she argues the side she does;
	don't want to see those checks interrupted.`

	But I don't see her chasing after the MOTHER, who she
	claims ALSO has support obligations.  And I don't see
	her answering MY question(s) about why it isn't time
	to start putting the "squeeze" on the MOTHER as well
	as this kids FATHER.

	Funny how she spends all her time telling us that we don't
	answer her questions, and she ignores ours.



-- 
	Alan Yasutovich
	"inquiring  (and nosey) minds WANT TO KNOW!!!"
	I can remember when "safe sex" meant having a padded headboard!!
	Tick Tock.....Tick Tock......Tick Tock .....Tick Tock......
Xref: sparky alt.dads-rights:3099 alt.child-support:4051
From: yasu@ll.mit.edu (Alan Yasutovich)
Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights,alt.child-support
Subject: Re: Itemized accounting of child support
Date: 23 Dec 92 17:44:38 GMT
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory

In article <Bzpw2D.C5z@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
><1992Dec22.212914.6338@desire.wright.edu> sbishop@desire.wright.edu writes:
>><Bzny8F.7Lr@cs.psu.edu>, beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
>
>>> Will you continue your "creative bookkeeping" in which you sometimes
>>> claim you use part of X for vacations, part of Y for college, and then
>>> say none of X or Y goes for vacations or college  -- because it's not 
>>> enough to pay for a teenager anyway?
>>> 
>>> Sue, could you please just stick to one accounting system?
>>
>>And maybe you had better learn to read.  Out of the 'huge' amount of $368
>>per month child support that Mike's dad pays, my husband and I get $300.
>
>I learned to read long ago.  Is there something hidden in the following?
>
>  "Plus out of the $300 we provide
>   him an allowance, transportation to all his sporting events, food, shelter,
>   entertainment, a really nice vacation every year....... (this Christmas
>   we will spend a week at a condo in the Florida Keys)....  And his dad 
>   accuses us of 'profiting!'."
>
>            - Sue Bishop, 10/3/92, <1992Oct3.204455.4515@desire.wright.edu>
>
>
>And, Sue, nobody (certainly not I) asked you to publicize these details 
>of your personal life.  Frankly, I couldn't care less -- but I do care 
>when someone claims that using child support money for luxuries is 
>justifiable and right.
>
>So your griping about "nosiness" and other paranoias might be 
>better directed to a therapist.
>
>>I still am very puzzled as to why my finances and how we spend Mike's
>>money is such an obsession with you?  Is it some kind of envy thing?
>>Or are you just compulsively nosy?
>
>Don
>-- 
>beaver@cs.psu.edu                       Opinions from the PC-challenged


	Not just that! It's a *REALLY NICE* vacation every year.


	Should we continue to parce out your words, Sue, like
	you do ours, or can we just stay "topical" from now
	on?

-- 
	Alan Yasutovich
	"inquiring  (and nosey) minds WANT TO KNOW!!!"
	I can remember when "safe sex" meant having a padded headboard!!
	Tick Tock.....Tick Tock......Tick Tock .....Tick Tock......
Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights,alt.child-support
From: yasu@ll.mit.edu (Alan Yasutovich)
Subject: Re: Itemized accounting of child support
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 13:16:44 GMT

In article <Bznyw5.895@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
>I would admire your generosity in taking on a foster child if
>you didn't spend so much time bitching about the burdens.
>


	You've summed it up!!!!!!



	Too bad that Sue keeps asking the same questions that
	we go over, and ignoring our answers, as well as our
	questions.

-- 
	Alan Yasutovich
	"inquiring  (and nosey) minds WANT TO KNOW!!!"
	I can remember when "safe sex" meant having a padded headboard!!
	Tick Tock.....Tick Tock......Tick Tock .....Tick Tock......
Xref: sparky alt.dads-rights:3068 alt.child-support:4027
From: jsw@cray.com (Jon S. Wood)
Subject: Re: Let's Play StipU (1)
Reply-To: jsw@cray.com
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 23 Dec 92 08:52:26 CST

>In article <BzIoB7.4Dr@ddsw1.mcs.com> karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger) writes:
>>In article <1goin9INN1b3@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
>>Yet once that social service agency comes around, its the states' problem
>>isn't it?  But only if you're a woman in the majority of cases today.  Men 
>>need not apply; just give the kid to mom and give dad the bill.
>
>
>Well, that's the current method of keeping our taxes below 50%, yeah.  Now,
>have you really proposed anything to make that better, or have you proposed
>something that makes it worse?  We haven't seen a convincing economic
>analysis.

 I think the convincing economic analysis for reducing society's burden
is to cut off funds for unmarried teenage parents. I also think there
should be a marked decrease in funding entitlements programmes in general.
It's cruel, but, what is more stupid. A society that hands out condoms
to non-adults and then the community says we have to do more to help
out single teenage parents? It doesn't make sense. The highly educated
elite propose to grant adult responsibilities without consequences, ignoring
personal responsibility. Current government bureaucracy and it's advocates
have done more to deny life's reality, consequenses. Is it compassionate
to foster self reliance on government? 
 If condoms are distributed in school because "they're going to do it 
anyway", why don't we hand out guns? The same logic applies, IMO. 

The St. Paul Pioneer Press reports today that by the year 2000, eighty 
thousand children a year will be abandoned by young parents because their
children have AIDS. The current rate of AIDS infected child abandonment
is 20,0000. 
 
>
>I think we'd be better off awarding custody to men in 50% of the cases, which
>is my proposal.  Simly to 'even things up' a bit and make both the rewards and
>the hardships more random.  Which would in turn drive more consideration in
>both work and social situations towards parents and children alike, instead
>of ghetto-izing them as occurs today. 

 I agree. No fault divorce isn't working, it's too easy. Society
again pays for it. Not all marriages are destined to reach the golden 
anniversary, neither should there be a 50% divorce rate. Now that we
have no-fault, we have created a new class of poor single parent homes
to be supported partially by a 30 percent federal tax rate, 5% state tax, 
a 13% social security tax (used to fudge the federal budget), a 5% sales
tax (Mn equals 6.5%), a democratic proposed 50 cent gas tax and for
a tremendous growing number of men (ncp) like me who pay 35% of their
income after my income taxes are deducted. 

 Not planning a retirement, 

 Jon Wood


Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights