HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: A644690C@edinboro.edu ("Adam J. Conover")
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Internet Protocol ('DOT' address)
Date: 25 Aug 92 20:04:50 GMT

>What I need is the DOT address of compuserve.com .
>(4 numbers separated by dots)
>For example, the numbers address of the Atari Archive is 141.211.164.8.
>So, if anyone is able to look it up for those of us who have problems...
>(I'm also looking for the address of kcbbs.gen.nz.)
>
>     -Itay

This 'DOT' address is the Internet Protocol address (IP).  Internet uses
TCP/IP to move information around in a fashion not unlike Ethernet LANs.
(Actually, many Ethernet LAN sites use TCP/IP as well).
Just my $.02.

-Adam Conover.
	a644690c@edinboro.edu
From: aa700@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Current)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: Atari binaries postings. A comment...
Date: 1 Sep 1992 15:11:04 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aa700@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Current)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc8.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, crow@coos.dartmouth.edu (Preston F. Crow) says:

>In <1992Aug31.175413.20955@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> garold@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (g.d.redenbaugh) writes:
>
>>However, is it necessary to have a separate binaries news group.  It
>>used to be common for binaries to be posted right to this group.  I am
>>not against a binary news group if it will get binaries posted but is
>>there a reason why binaries can not be posted here.
>
>I think you have a good point.  Why don't we just post uuencoded files
>here for now.  If it becomes a problem, then we will have a much better
>argument for a new group.  As it is, I'm not convinced that a new group is
>needed.

Imagine reading the Info-Atari8 Digest at, say, 300 bps, with say, a
1500-line .uue file in the middle of it.  Do you think you'd watch the
binary go by so you could read the messages at the end of the Digest? 
Info-Atari8 subscribers have no way to just skip over .uue postings they
don't want to read, they have to either watch the whole binary go by, or
they miss some of the other postings to the group.  This was the reason
we've fairly successfully moved our file sharing from this group to the
archive.  The proposed binaries newsgroup would indeed be accessable to all
Usenet readers, but the readers of this group without Usenet access would
not be able to make use of it.  Perhaps a new idea: why not have the
proposed binaries group available as a separate mail-list as well?
-- 
 Michael Current, Cleveland Free-Net 8-bit Atari SIGOp   -->>  go atari  <<--
   The Cleveland Free-Net Atari SIG is the Central Atari Information Network
      Internet: currentm@carleton.edu / UUCP: ...!umn-cs!ccnfld!currentm
     BITNET: currentm%carleton.edu@{interbit} / Cleveland Free-Net: aa700
From: tmkk@uiuc.edu (Khan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: GEnie To Internet
Date: 27 Aug 92 13:33:17 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana


In article <1992Aug26.212904.15265@samba.oit.unc.edu> usenet@samba.oit.unc.edu writes:
>
>tmkk@uiuc.edu (Khan) writes:
>>>Well, you don't have to subscribe to the Internet mail.  I do think that
>>>$9.95 is a little high, and it's silly that you can't even receive mail from
>>>Internet without paying that fee.
>>
>>I suggested that very thing to them. I told them they could be the FIRST
>>commercial online service to offer REAL Internet access, and beat their
>>arch rival CI$ to the punch. Apparently they just don't understand the
>>value of that particular service.
>
>Last night on GEnie, there was a RTC (round table conference) with the
>designer/implementor of the GEnie/Inet gateway. I (and others) asked
>about these issues and he said that they are delaying this access
>until they check out some security problems [just to be sure that it
>will work to _their_ standards, I believe.] They _do_ understand the
>value, but you need to understand that Unix is not the safest OS in
>the world, and just one security glitch could lose GE gobs of $$.

Are you telling me that GEnie's computers run under UNIX? If they do
not, then what possible effect could any insecurities in a UNIX system
affect GEnie? Don't make the common mistake of assuming that the
Internet has anything at all to do with UNIX - the purists will bite
your head off! ;-)

I logged on GEnie and checked out the INTERNET beta-test section the other
night. It costs $9.95 EXTRA per month (effectively tripling the $4.95
monthly subscription fee) PLUS you get to pay $0.40 *per message*. I took
advantage of their feedback menu option and told them what I thought of
their pricing strategy. ;-)

I pointed out to them that Public Access UNIX systems everywhere offer
unlimited Internet mail for a couple of dollars per month. Many FIDOnet
BBSi offer internet mail for FREE. Even *Compu$teal* charges less for sending/
receiving Internet mail than GEnie does. Now, if CI$ charges less for a
service than you do, you KNOW you are overpriced. You'd think that GEnie
would have taken a hint from the massive outcry when Fraudigy started
charging per email message and avoided per-message charges like the
plague, but alas such was not the case.

I've been pulling for GEnie for a long time, ever since they started up
their Star*Services for a flat rate monthly fee. They have the potential
to be the BEST online service in terms of bang/buck. Based on what I've
seen of this Internet gateway setup, however, GEnie's going to blow this
BIGTIME if they don't wise up. :-(
From: ekrimen@wet.UUCP (Ed Krimen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: Atari corp. (Falcon?)
Date: 31 Aug 92 20:13:59 GMT
Organization: Wetware Diversions, San Francisco

In article <1992Aug31.120919.2447@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> ichamiel@nyx.cs.du.edu (Itay Chamiel) writes:
>And what IS it? A blown ST? A game machine?
>Prob. won't apear around here anyway... what AM i blabbering about..:)

Yeah, it's an STE on steriods.  It could also be a =very= nice game machine. 
:^)  It has those analog STE joystick ports that everyone knows and loves, not
to mention the graphics and sound capabilities.  You should read c.s.atari.st
to find out more about it.


-- 
   |||    Ed Krimen
   |||    ekrimen@wet.com
  / | \   E.KRIMEN (GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: Atari binaries postings.  A comment...
From: rlcollins@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Ryan 'Gozar' Collins)
Date: 27 Aug 92 11:16:40 -0500
Organization: Miami University Academic Computer Service"

In article <1992Aug26.143935.7952@neb>, jim@neb (Jim Hood) writes:
> 
> I am not talking about posting all of atari.archive here.  I mean an
> area LIKE comp.binaries.ibm.pc where an ocasional file comes by.
> 
> Oh well.  As I can see, no one here seems interested in exchanging
> binaries via usenet news.  I think that is too bad.  If there was a 
> group for the exchange of binaries, then those intersted could
> participate (and it might even increase the stuff availaible at the
> archives [because people would copy it to the archive], and those not
> interested woulden't even have to look at the news group.

     Why not try an alt.atari.8bit.binaries group? It's easier to get
started, and it would let us all see how successful a 8bit.binaries
group could be.

Later.......

------======={{{{{{{{((((((Ryan 'Gozar' Collins))))))))}}}}}}}}=======--------
"You can never own enough /    __    ___  ___  \rlcollins@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu
computer equipment"      /    /  /  /  /    /   \RC1DSANU@miamiu.acs.muohio.edu
                        /    / _   /  /   /      \rcollins@apsvax.aps.muohio.edu
 |||   "Power Without  /    /__/  /__/  /___      \  R.COLLINS1 on GEnie
/ | \     The Price"  /                            \
	    ------======={{{{{{{{(((((())))))))}}}}}}}}=======-----  27-AUG-1992
From: charles.berlinguette@outlan.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Charles Berlinguette) 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Atari binaries postings.
Date: 27 Aug 92 10:26:00 GMT
Reply-To: charles.berlinguette@outlan.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Charles Berlinguette) 
Distribution: world
Organization: Outland BBS-UUCP

JH>Organization: Nebula BBS - Salt Lake City Utah, USA

JH>phbill@well.sf.ca.us writes:
>jim@neb (Jim Hood) writes:
>
>> Is there a reason that we here in the atari 8-bit newsgroup are
>> NOT doing this on a regular basis and in a defined area??
>>
>
>Here're the reasons >I< can think of:
>
>1) would take up too much space

JH>3 files a month???  I don't think so.
JH>Then comp.binaries.ibm.pc, comp.binaires.pictures (etc) would not exist.

>2) we have the atari archives

JH>To which not everyone has access.  EVEN VIA MAIL.  I mailed 3 days
JH>ago, and still have not recieved a reply....

>3) would everybody ALWAYS get EVERY file posted?
>   I ALWAYS read EVERY message posted... but I haven't sent for EVERY
>   archive file..  and simply posting them ALL OVER the world wouldn't
>   be very sane when anyone with UseNet/uucp access can just mail for
>   them...

JH>I am not talking about posting all of atari.archive here.  I mean an
JH>area LIKE comp.binaries.ibm.pc where an ocasional file comes by.

JH>Oh well.  As I can see, no one here seems interested in exchanging
JH>binaries via usenet news.  I think that is too bad.  If there was a
JH>group for the exchange of binaries, then those intersted could
JH>participate (and it might even increase the stuff availaible at the
JH>archives [because people would copy it to the archive], and those not
JH>interested woulden't even have to look at the news group.

Lets have a vote on this, I for one would be interested in a group
for ATARI 8 bit binaries. With the advent of OS/2 and other OS's the
amount of traffic generated in those BINARY groups are very large
compared to any significant traffic this new group would generate.

The trouble with this idea, and if its required, who would moderate it?
---
 . DeLuxe./386 1.25 #1464s . This is your brain. This is your brain on DOS!
                                                                        
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: borgen@stud.cs.uit.no (Boerge Noest)
Subject: Re: Old software
Organization: University of Tromsoe, Norway
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 12:41:19 GMT

In article <q6usoB7w164w@cyberden.uucp> moon!cyberden!phbill@well.sf.ca.us writes:
>I even HAVE anymore that I got about 5 or 6 years ago!  Any OTHER pirated 
>stuff (which I'm not aware is pirated... like Draconus.  We still don't 
>know if it's PD or not!) I probably got STRAIGHT FROM THE ATARIBASE BBS, 

Draconus is very much commercial, if it is the same game as the one I know
from the C=64. Copyright Zeppelin Games, a budget software house in the UK.

>PhBill: Bill Kendrick      / | \
-- 
|/// borgen@stud.cs.uit.no (Boerge Noest) | Amiga B2000			 \\\|
|//  Box 218, 9001 Tromsoe, Norway	  | Remember to :-) when needed	  \\|
|/   The worlds northermost university	  | Life is worth living.	   \|
	_Tilbyr News/email til hele Nord-Norge: Ta kontakt_
From: dunham@mpd.tandem.com (Jerry Dunham)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: UTIL, ATARIO, SR
Date: 4 Sep 92 17:21:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: devnull.2382
Reply-To: dunham_jerry@tandem.com (Jerry Dunham)
Organization: Tandem Computers, Inc.

In article <01GOCRPZ0IVA8Y5HUQ@carleton.edu> CURRENTM@CARLETON.EDU (Michael Current) writes:

>For those of us that have been long confused by the various versions of Atari
>disk readers for PCs, here's what I discovered.  It turns out there are several
>copies of the same thing at the archive.
>
>Here are the details:

This sure looks to me like information that belongs in the FAQ, or at least in
an info file on the atari.archive.  This shouldn't be lost as soon as it falls
off the end of the newsgroup.  Thanks to Michael for pulling all this together
for the rest of us.

-- 
Jerry Dunham                                        dunham_jerry@tandem.com
Tandem Computers, Inc.                                dunham@mpd.tandem.com
Austin, TX                                                    (512)244-8598
                 This opinion intentionally left blank.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: andy@homebase.vistachrome.com (Andy Finkenstadt)
Subject: Re: GEnie To Internet
Reply-To: andy@homebase.vistachrome.com
Organization: Vista-Chrome Incorporated
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 21:18:03 GMT

Jeff McWilliams <JJMCWILL@MTUS5.BITNET> writes:
>Maybe GEnie is approaching the Internet connection cautiosly for the same
>reason.  But it shouldn't cause any problems, GEnie users already have
>unique user identifications.  Hopefully we'll see all online services
>eventually granting fuller access to the Internet, without all these
>surcharges they insist on imposing.
>Jeff

Well, one idea that pops into my mind, speaking for myself, is that
with a direct Internet connection (telnet, for example) you now have
some little hacker sitting at a university somewhere who can repeatedly
attempt to get onto your account and run up your bill...  not a good
situation.  With a dial-up connection that costs $.25 each call (such
as with hermes.merit.edu) Mr. Hacker will soon go broke since he has
to pre-pay it.

-Andy

-- 
Andrew Finkenstadt       | Vista-Chrome, Inc.   |           andy@GEnie
GEnie Unix Sysop/Manager | The Printing House   |    NIC Handle: AF136
+1 904 222 2639 home     | 1600 Capital Cir SW  |   ...!uunet!rde!andy
+1 904 575 0189 work     | Tallahassee FL 32310 | andy@vistachrome.com
--------->  "Our OS which art in CPU... UNIX be thy name"  <----------
From: Chris_F_Chiesa@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: Clarification about Re: Posting atari 8-bit binary files he
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 22:18:28 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

Re: transferring files from SPARCstation to Atari 8-bit

This should work:

* Acquire a copy of "mtools" for the SPARCstation; this is a public-domain 
  set of routines that will allow the SPARCstation to read/write MS-DOS
  3.5" floppy disks in the SPARCstation's built-in 3.5" drive.  Use this 
  capability to place your Atari 8-bit files onto MS-DOS 3.5" disk. 

* Acquire the program "UTIL" from the Atari Archive; copy it, too, onto
  MS-DOS 3.5" disk.  UTIL is a program for the PC which allows it to read/
  write true double-density AtariDOS 2.0 (e.g. MyDOS w/o subdirectories)
  disks.

* Acquire a PC that has a 3.5" drive AND a 5.25" drive.  These seem to be
  getting scarcer, but I have one so maybe you can find one.  Put the 3.5" 
  disk containing UTIL (for the PC) and the downloaded Atari files, into the
  3.5" drive.  Put a true double-density AtariDOS 2.0 formatted disk into the
  5.25" drive (formatting a "true double-density" disk in AtariDOS 2.0 format
  is left as an exercise for the reader; I'd sweat over it, myself, but I've
  done it so I know it's possible).  Use UTIL to write the Atari files from
  the 3.5" PC disk to the 5.25" Atari disk.

* Use the 5.25" true double-density AtariDOS disk with any AtariDOS 2.0
  compatible, true double-density-supporting DOS, to read and use the files
  on your Atari.

Caveats:  UTIL is prone to misbehavior.  Mtools isn't the easiest thing to
  use.  UTIL only works on 360K PC drives.

Chris Chiesa
  Chris_F_Chiesa@cup.portal.com
From: Jim_Johnson@abcd.Houghton.MI.US (Jim Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: SpartaDos trashing directories!!!
Distribution: world
Date: 27 Aug 92 23:25:33 EST
Organization: Amiga BitSwap Central Dispatch

In a message dated Thu 27 Aug 92 16:31, Rlcollins@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (ry
wrote:
 R> Jim_Johnson@abcd.Houghton.MI.US (Jim Johnson) writes:
> I never had a problem with Sparta 3.2 trashing directories as you
mention. 
> I started out with 3.2 and upgraded to SDX with no problems.  What kind
of
> drive & density are you using.

 R>      Well, after some experimenting, it only does it (so far) with
 R> double denisty disks. (I have a US Doubled 1050). 

 R>      Could the us doubler go bad? (I haven't tried Single density
 R> Ultraspeed yet though)

Yes you could very well be having problems with the USD chip.  It has two
documented problems:
1- it runs hotter than the original Atari drive controller chip, make sure
the drive has a continuous flow of air to it (i.e., don't put the drive
under a shelf or something where the air doesn't move.
2- the chip legs are shorter than most IC's.  Atari uses two socket types,
one is flat and causes few problems (other than #1 above), and the other
socket type has slight ridges.  Due to the heat, if your USD is in one of
the ridged sockets, it will work its way loose, and you will have to
continually re-seat it.  The easy solution is to buy a chip socket with a
flat top, plug this into the soldered in socket, then plug in the USD.  The
cost is less than a buck.

The above solved all my problems with my USD 1050.

-- Via DLG Pro v0.995

Jim Johnson-
*** Remember, they're only tools - Not a way of life! ***
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
From: grover@emunix.emich.edu (Grover Thomas)
Subject: Re: Memory Expansion Modules for the 800.
Organization: Eastern Michigan University
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 09:19:50 GMT

In article <92239.210218JJMCWILL@MTUS5.BITNET> Jeff McWilliams <JJMCWILL@MTUS5.BITNET> writes:
>In regards to the 256K memory card expansion.  I have an article in
>a little booklet I got in '87 called  Mods, Fixes, and Upgrades which
>details this.  I finally got a copy of the documentation out to Dan Nowicki
>who had requested the information back when  I was doing the Atari Classics
>campaign.   Well, better late than never anyhow.

I am certainly interested in this information.  I've never heard of this
before, and I always thought the 800 was limited to about 52K max.  I'm
pretty good with my soldering iron, but I lack the raw technical knowledge
to just hack away at my machine willy nilly.  

If someone has this info in a text file, could they post it here?
Can programs actually "see" the 256K?  (for example, Flight Simulator
II disk has a 48K version and a 64K version which loads depending on
your setup.  I would really like to play the 64K version.)
-- 
 __                                                                        __
(__)  Grover Thomas                   InterNet:  grover@emunix.emich.edu  (__
From: moon!cyberden!phbill@well.sf.ca.us
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: Old software
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 19:23:38 PDT
Organization: Indescribable Creations

borgen@stud.cs.uit.no (Boerge Noest) writes:

> Draconus is very much commercial, if it is the same game as the one I know
> from the C=64. Copyright Zeppelin Games, a budget software house in the UK.

mm..... the one for the 8-bits (at least the one I have with the green 
monster running around breathing fire and squashing things) says (c) 1988 
Cognito.  If it's truly pirated,, it's among very few (that I know of... 
if any) on the BBS I got it from (not known to be a pirate board..  a 
user group board for a matter of fact)

Is Cognito still around?  (or Zeppelin Games, if they made it)  BTW: The 
same fellas (in the credits) made Zybex.  It has no (c), date OR name 
except of the authors.

If so and it is the game, I'd llike to purchase a legal copy (so I'll 
have the instructions!... besides,I'd definitely pay for an AWESOME game 
like that....)

___________________________ ||| __      PhBill @ Cyberden (+1 415 472-5527)
PhBill: Bill Kendrick      / | \        San Rafael, California, U.S.A. //
moon!cyberden!phbill@well.sf.ca.us      (North of San Francisco)    \\//
__________________________________      << Coming soon: C.E.BBS! >>  \/
                   August 30, 1992
From: Rick_Michael_Cortese@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: RGB on 800/XL/XE?
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 08:26:06 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

The color comes out on one pin of GTIA. I seem to recall an old article in
Byte Magazine about using the GTIA's 4 lum outputs on a RGB monitor, but you
had to do all your own screen output routines 'cause intensity was now color.
Not sure, but I thinnk either National Semiconductor or Motorola has a
composite to RGB chip. Never fooled around much with the video myself. It's
Probably not a bad idea since composite monitors are getting harder to find
& CGA monitors are everywhere. IMHO: Since the Byte thing didn't catch on,
people probably want compatability with existing stuff over just being
able to hook something up => Atari's stock output=> convertor (<$10) => IBM
monitor.
Anyway, if you just want where the sync, color, & lum signals come out so
you can fool around, let me know & I'll get you the pin-outs.
Organization: Computing Technology Services, Michigan Technological Univ.
Date: Thursday, 27 Aug 1992 17:55:17 EST
From: Jeff McWilliams <JJMCWILL@MTUS5.BITNET>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: SpartaDos trashing directories!!!
Distribution: world
 <1992Aug27.133708.12351@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu>

Ryan,


Have you tried some of the patched versions of SpartaDOS?

Jeff McWilliams    ---->  jjmcwill@mtus5.cts.mtu.edu
jjmcwill@mtus5.mtu.edu    jjmcwill@mtus5.mtu.edu.BITNET
cd827@cleveland.freenet.edu
cd827%cleveland.freenet.edu@cunyvm
From: moon!cyberden!phbill@well.sf.ca.us
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: Help for ATARI XE video game system.
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 11:59:06 PDT
Organization: Indescribable Creations

"Marek Tomczyk" <UJ1G@DKAUNI2.BITNET> writes:

> As far as I know, the XE game system is internally identical to
> the XE home computers. You could take cartridges that run on
> that system (800XE, 130XE).
> Software for the XLs will run without problems (800XL, 600XL).
> 
> I know that Daemon Attack from Imagic requires the old operating system.

1) 800XE!?
       ^   I hope that's a typo.  If not, give details!!!!

2) Daemon Attack?
    ^      Is THAT a typo, or just the German spelling of Demon??
hmmm

___________________________ ||| __      PhBill @ Cyberden (+1 415 472-5527)
PhBill: Bill Kendrick      / | \        San Rafael, California, U.S.A.
moon!cyberden!PhBill@well.sf.ca.us      (North of San Francisco)
__________________________________
                   August 30, 1992
From: moon!cyberden!phbill@well.sf.ca.us
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Re: oh!
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 19:28:20 PDT
Organization: Indescribable Creations

Rick_Michael_Cortese@cup.portal.com writes:

> I finally got around to sorting my old Antic(s) & I think it was June '85
> that had an article on the 1030 modem & using Turbo Basic with an R: handler.
> Apparently I was in error saying you needed to use a DOS with a lower memlo.
> It works, but the Article said it's the TB Autorun.sys file that trashes the
> handler so you can use TB's BRUN or BLOAD (whatever?) to load the hander
> After TB is loaded.

Is this true with, say, an SX212 handler?  I'm pretty positive I've tried 
this!  Maybe I could try loading it with an XIO 39, like I do in normal 
BASIC.  I dunno why I'm even worrying tho!  I've got Quick (for my 
disfunctional 1200xl!) and have Action! on the way... and I have Pascal.

Hell, I even have Delta-Drawing... too bad you cant load an R: handler 
into that! hahah

damn!!!  that just made me think of something!! if I recall the docs, CGS 
does plotting/drawing like you would on a graph (the word escapes me).. 
wouldnt doing it Turtle-style save data xfer?...  instead of needing x,y 
x,y for the two ends, just deg,len for the turn and the length.  This 
wont be a replacement, but it may come in handy.

Oh, all those turtle-style designs while online.. wow

___________________________ ||| __      PhBill @ Cyberden (+1 415 472-5527)
PhBill: Bill Kendrick      / | \        San Rafael, California, U.S.A. //
moon!cyberden!phbill@well.sf.ca.us      (North of San Francisco)    \\//
__________________________________      << Coming soon: C.E.BBS! >>  \/
                   August 30, 1992
From: bruck@BRACHOT.JCT.AC.IL (Itay Chamie1)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit
Subject: Helping Digest readers
Date: 2 Sep 92 18:44:05 GMT
X-Unparsable-Date: Wed, 2 Sep 92 21:43:21 EET DST

Ok, everybody!! An announcement!!

Each binary posting shhould now have "zzzz [progname, comments]" as the
subject, so it will be at the end of the Digest.

Is that good?

-Itay