From: abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian)
Subject: TIME HAS INERTIA.  VERIFIABILITY CARRIED TO RIDICULE IN GR AND QM
Summary: DO NOT PUSH  VERIFIABILITY TO RIDICULOUS LIMITS
Keywords: TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS  IS CARRIED TO  CREDULITY IN  GR AND QM
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 23:24:39 GMT

                                      12-13-92

To the readers of TIME HAS INERTIA  and  
(A1), (A2), (A3), (A4)


    A major reason of some readers' ruthless dismissal of my (A1), (A2), 
(A3), (A4) is that according to them, my assertions are not scientifically 
verified and that they are  pure delirious hallucinations since my asser-
tions are not tested and confirmed in laboratories.  
   
    Of course the  "guardians of Physics and Truth" in their own similar situa-
ation, refer to their assertions as "thought experiment", "gedanken exper-
iment".  Obviously, this is not a hypocrisy it is a matter of scientific nomen-
clature!!
   
    What is so appalling is that "the guardians of Physics and Truth" push 
the verifiability to the most ridiculous limits in their everyday twisting and 
twirling of their principles to explain the occurrence of unexpected pheno-
mena in their laboratories and in the Cosmos.  
   
    They frantically resist to admit (A1),(A2)  and especially (A3) and 
resist toaccept that particles, as well as planets, as well as people, 
as well as galaxies  are governed in all of their actions by the most 
powerful, and primal principle  (A3), i.e., "GAINING A FEELING OF SECURITY".

   Here is a typical example of how  "guardians of Physics and Truth" push
the notion of VERIFIABILITY to sottish and fatuous limits, especially 
when dealing with particle physics.

   It was experimentally  observed and verified that when a certain
   rooster  R  crowed in the morning, the sun rose.


   The experiment was repeated  for a whole week and it did not fail
   a single day.  
   
   The experimentalist  E  said that there is a good experimental indi-
   cation that the Rooster's crow  rises the sun.

   A colleague  C  challenges  E.  The colleague  C  says "I do not 
   agree with your experimental conclusion. I will prove you wrong.  
   I will kill the rooster R and you will see that the sun will still
   rise".
   
   C  kills the rooster, cleans it up and puts it in the refrigerator.

   Next day there is no crow of the rooster R but sun rose again,
   
   Then  C  tells E, "you see the crow of the rooster was not the reason
   for the rise of the sun - there was no crow but the sun rose again"

   E (twists and twirls) and says "Oh, no .  The vocal cords of the 
   dead rooster R in the refrigerator  did vibrate this morning how-
   ever with an inaudible frequency - and so again, the crow of the 
   rooster R was the reason for the sun to rise".

   C  says, "I will eat the neck of the rooster R. There will be
   no vocal cords  and you will see that the sun will still rise"
  
   C  eats the neck of the rooster  R and gives the rest of  R to
   the neighbors.
   
   Next day, there is no neck of  R  and no  R itself in the refrigerator.
   But the sun did rise again.
   
    C confronts  E  again.

    E (twists and twirls) and says  " the molecules of the vocal cords of 
    the rooster  R  which are in your intestines, they did vibrate this
    morning. Thus it was indeed again the crow  of the rooster  R  which
    rose the sun this morning.
    
    E,  triumphantly says to  R " that's it the experiment verified that the 
    crow of the rooster  R  rises the sun everyday".

    Similar experimental conclusions are made everyday.  So, do not dismiss
    my assertions (A1), (A2), (A3), (A4) on the ground of experimentabil-
    ity.   
    
    Trust me, accept (A1) to (A4),  I am sure that they will pass the 
    genuine test of the experimental verifiability.


     With love,                            Alexander Abian    






-- 
   The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
                The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.  
    TIME HAS INERTIA  and some energy is lost to move Time forward  
  E = mcc  (Einstein)    must be replaced by    E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)
Xref: sparky sci.physics:21287 sci.math:17022