From: ghassoun@augean.eleceng.adelaide.edu.AU (George Hassoun)
Newsgroups: misc.headlines,soc.misc,talk.politics.mideast,talk.politics.misc,alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Want facts?  "WHO RUNS THE MEDIA?  The Alarming Facts"
Date: 10 Apr 92 01:58:51 GMT
Organization: Electrical and Electronic Eng., University of Adelaide

I think the article above is an invaluable peace of information.
It is quite long, but it tells you to what extent the media and
consequently the brains of many generations are almost unnoticeably
controlled by a concentrated minority of Jews.

When i was in the United States (1986-1991) i was always perplexed
by the general (not always publically manifested) attitude implying
that arabs in most cases belong to a certain well defined category
of people. ``You don't look like an arab'' was the most frequent reaction
i used to get when first introduced to people.  ``As if arabs could be
classified or categorised in one single shot'', i used to think. Soon i
learnt that the idea does not affect appearance only, but it extends to
behaviour, way of thinking, mentality and quality of attitude. In many
cases i used to get this astonished face, as if what i'm doing is not
part of the common expectations.

Soon after, and upon being confronted to the type of information about
the Middle East written in the papers and shown on TV, i started to realise
how biased is the information. I realised the difference between the general
information level (regarding this arab-israeli conflict) of an average
Parisien for example and an average citizen of Columbus, Ohio. Soon i realised
that e.g. the New York Times is no match to Paris' Le Monde (regarding this
issue). In Paris, people would
confront you in the streets with very detailed questions reflecting well
informed opinions while in Columbus (for example), people were full of
curiosity but at the same time they were, most of the time, displaying an
almost inacceptable degree of ignorance (regarding this matter again).

The question of ``why so many Americans seem to be satisfied, regarding this
issue, with a shaky level of information, while they seem to be zealous,
commited, competitive, and mostly well informed in many other areas''
remained unanswered for a very long time (was n't it Mr James Baker, who on
a recent visit to the Holly Land metioned something to the effect of:`` Oh..
the distances are so small''?!)

Here comes the article above to spot the lights on some reasons for this
issue. Nothing wrong with Jews being successful (Good on them) but to
use their success to hide relevant facts is an immoral act.

Unbiased, objective information is a necessary ingredient of the
process of making a good judgement. In the past i used to say ``Why the
h.. the American people (with all its tendencies towards, fairness, justice
and righteous behaviour) why they don't see?'' and now i say, ``Give the
American people the facts, ALL THE FACTS, and let them judge.

If it is possible to repost the article above another time, please do.
May be some people did not have the chance to look at it. And most frankly
i see it as a ``start of a new era'' (these are not my words aren't they).

It took James Baker 43 years (since the 1948 occupation of Phillistine)
to realise that the distances in the disputed land are short..with a bit
of luck it should not take more than another 43 years to realise that the
land after all .. is a Phillistinian land!
-- 
George Hassoun
University of Adelaide, EEE Dpt.
Adelaide, South Australia
email: ghassoun@eleceng.adelaide.edu.au      Phone:(08) 228 5468
Xref: sparky misc.headlines:3443 soc.misc:576 talk.politics.misc:18393