HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles Victory...
Date: 6 Jan 93 16:44:47 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <1993Jan5.210615.5994@cbnewsm.cb.att.com> jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes) writes:
>In article <3241@devnull.mpd.tandem.com>, dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan4.200139.27364@cbnewsm.cb.att.com> jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes) writes:
>> >And may I add, led by a quarterback who has never won a playoff game.

>> Again, hysterical, considering that the same could be said of your beloved
>> Randall three days ago.

>And Aikman's never lost a playoff game because he's never taken Dallas
>to the playoffs before this season.

Randall has never taken the Eagles to the playoffs, either; the defense
has.  He *has*, however, taken them *out* of the playoffs a couple of
times.  If you think the Eagles can make it on Cunningham's shoulders,
then your worship of him is much more blind than I ever thought it could
be.  Aikman hasn't had a chance to take the team to the playoffs, because
they were terrible his first year, and he was injured the next two.  Now,
though,  he has them there, and there they stay, for at least two games
this year, and many years to come.  Wish I could say the same about the
Eagles, but free agency going to rip them apart come next month.

Daniel Welch
From: zg03+@andrew.cmu.edu (Zafrir E. Gan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: aPost subject [PittsBurg ???]> a
Date: 4 Jan 93 17:14:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.4fGDoLW00WB3Iawm47
Organization: Fifth yr. senior, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


    Well I hope you'all in bufalo. come on down to the City of Champions
better known as Pittsburgh, PA.  It should be a great game.

IRON "Go Steelers" MIKE
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jemartin@nyx.cs.du.edu (John Martin)
Subject: Re: Greatest Moment
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 93 22:49:34 GMT

In article <1993Jan4.202653.28866@lgc.com> ajj@zycor.lgc.com (Andrew Jackson) writes:
>
>As a Seahawk fan, the greatest moment was the playoff victory over
>the Miami Dolphins (24 - 20 if I remember rightly) at Miami in a Division-
>al Playoff game of the 1982-3 season. I think Marino was a rookie. Miami
>was expected to blow away Seattle, but at the final gun I remember the
>Orange Bowl crowd being in total shock.

Actually, it was 27-20 during the 1983-84 season - close enough, though.
Being a pretty loyal Seahawk fan (I even made it through this season!), I
agree with that one.  I can still remember that feeling (even though I was
just 13 at the time) that 'this is *the* high point', especially after so
many mediocre years since coming into the league in '76.  Here's hoping
they'll start the climb back up next season...

John
--
 John E. Martin    jemartin@nyx.cs.du.edu      University of Puget Sound '92
    Kent, WA     (formerly martin@ups.edu)   SeinfeldSuperSonicsBC++RushDWeckl
From: chf0@bunny.gte.com (Curt Fennell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Is there one HONEST Bills fan?
Date: 4 Jan 93 20:53:30 GMT
Reply-To: chf0@gte.com
Distribution: usa
Organization: GTE Laboratories, Waltham, MA

In article <1993Jan4.190732.12315@kadsma.kodak.com>, pajerek@telstar.kodak.com (Don Pajerek) writes:
|> 
|> And guess what? This 'greatest comeback in NFL history', and almost
|> certainly the greatest game in franchise history, WAS NOT SEEN IN
|> BUFFALO! That's right, the game didn't sell out, and so the blackout
|> was in effect. With the exception of those with access to satellite
|> dishes, no one in Buffalo or Rochester saw this game.

There's a certain poetic justice to this, don't you think?

Curt

Curt "I always pick the Dolphins - even against Buffalo!"  Fennell
			DOLFAN in New England.             
'72 Dolphins - The perfect team in the perfect season - 17-0
'92 Dolphins - AFC East Division Champions
From: zz96pc@sdacs.ucsd.edu (Pedro Cruz)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: My thanks to Da Bolts
Date: 12 Jan 93 21:19:51 GMT
Distribution: usa


 
 Thank you Chargers for an exciting year.

Thank you Ronnie Harmon for all those fantastic catches and 
your hard work ethic that enabled you to prance around would
be defenders like a gazelle. You so rightly deserve team MVP.

Thank you Stan Humphries, you are the "MAN". You came in without
a pre-season, lost your first three starts, then won 12 out of 13.
That was fun! So you had a bad game in Maimi. They played a good
game, give them credit.  You really showed me something when you
came back and played with a dislocated shoulder in the play-offs,
good luck with your surgery next week. Oh yea, John "Deep" Friesz
will be back next season to push you, should be a fun pre-season.
And NO we don't need Montana....

Thank you Leslie O'Neal, Burt Grossman, Blaise Winter, Shawn Lee,
Chris Mims and George Thornton for getting into the opposing teams
backfield and smashing the opposition. Another Pro Bowl huh Leslie?
In my book, your are rookie of the year Chris.

Thank you Junior Seau for being the Tasmanian Devil on defense.
You ARE the premier linebacker in the NFL and only getting better.
Plummer, you've always been solid, don't change.....

Thank you Anthony Miller and Gill Byrd for another Pro Bowl
year. Hey who threw you the ball Anthony? Oh yea, that man
Stan...

Thank you Marion Butts for running over people and using one
of your four moves against KC in the playoffs. Rod Bernstine,
when you played your were great, but this year you were snake
bit with injuries. May the Gods smile on you next year because
your really something with the ball.

Thank you receiving corps, thank you secondary and special teams,
you all improved.....

And a special thanks to Alex Spanos and Bobby Beathard for bringing
in Bobby Ross and Bill Arnsparger. They're the ones who got the
team together and gave them the confidence to know they're winners.

The loss in Miami wasn't the end, but the beginning. Da Bolts are
back, and this year was just a calling card...

It was an historical season, one for the books....watch out next year.


       -Dro



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: tech@cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini)
Subject: Re: CRAP FOOTBALL STIKES AGAIN!
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 17:28:20 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.132435.1@vaxa.strath.ac.uk> clg292@vaxa.strath.ac.uk writes:
>hi there it,s hamish here again, with just a few points to take up with all
>you flammers.
>Firstly i am SCOTTISH not bloody English so cut out your references to soccer
>violence.This as always been a problem in England, but even they have it under
>control know.In Scotland we have the best behaved fans in the world,at the
>last world cup we were congratulated for our impecable behaviou in italy and at
>the european championships this summer u.e.f.a gave out medals to all the
>scottish fans who traveled to sweeden, because they were the best behaved fans
>there, and had noone arrested.

Well you,re not going to win any metals for good behavior in this
group you twit. How about observing some net manners and take this
crap to the right news group.

However in the interest of international relations let me extend to
you a sincere offer. Some world cup games will be played in Orlando
next year and if Scotland is one of them I have a bed you can crash in
if you want to come to town. Leave your attitude at home.

Tony (go san diego) Travaglini
tech@cs.ucf.edu
From: gharriso@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Graeme Harrison)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Championship predictions
Date: 11 Jan 93 21:20:12 GMT
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server

/ hpcc01:rec.sport.football.pro / boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell) / 10:23 am  Jan 11, 1993 /
Predictions for championship games         

DAL at SF - this will be a tough game.  Young has not looked good in his
last couple starts.  DAL has the #1 D against the rush.  Meanwhile, SF's D
is also good against the rush and is much better against the pass then many
think.  I hope SF wins.  However, I think DAL has a real shot at this.

I'll say Dallas by 3.

Don
----------

Right now the 49ers are favored by 4 points, but 3 points attributed to
being at home and an extra point for playing in mud! :-) 

Dallas would be *very* hard to beat at home and it's to the 49ers big
advantage that they're playing at the 'stick. Also, Dallas had quite
an emotional game over the Eagles and routed Cunningham's team with
the greatest of ease. Really expected the Eagles to do better, but
Dallas made superior offensive and defensive coaching decisions which
put the Eagles down and out. 

49ers, especially Young, are determined to do better in the NFC Title
game as they miffed too many chances to put the Redskins away. Should
have been a blow out, but those 4 turnovers didn't help especially
the ones which allowed Redskins a quick and easy 10 points. 

I recall the 49ers blowing away the Chicago Bears #1 defense in 1984
NFC Title game and the same could happen to the Cowboys. What many
people don't take into account is that the 49ers have been in the
playoffs every year except 1991 since 1981 and it took a Roger Craig
fumble which prevented them from going into their 3rd consecutive
Super Bowl....much to the distress of Steve Young. That Vikings game
they lost in 1987 was blamed, in part, to Bill Walsh making the team
practice too hard. 

Mike Shanahan has been reported to be even better than the current 
Green Bay Packers head coach as offensive coordinator of the Niners.

We have the NFL's #1 offense vs NFL's #1 defense and, believe me, the
49ers have the coaches and personnel to beat Dallas. Still, it'll all
boil down to who makes the fewest mistakes and makes the most of any
opportunities. Think Cowboys offense and 49ers defense match up well
against each other.  

Cowboys owe 49ers one from the 1982 NFC Title game? Nope, 49ers still
owe Cowboys for those 3 playoff losses in the 1970-1973 seasons and
so far it's Dallas 3-1 and 49ers 1-3 so 49ers hope to collect this
year and the next time they meet in playoffs. What's more, 49ers
haven't lost to the Cowboys since 1980! :-) 

49ers by 10.

Graeme Harrison
San Jose, CA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: "The Catch" (WAS: Randall, Emmitt, and "The Catch")
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 20:06:07 GMT

In article <IK.93Jan12074335@puffin.ctt.bellcore.com> Ik Su Yoo <ik@mobydick.leis.bellcore.com> writes:

>Why does the media and everybody else only talk about "The Catch"? If I
>remember correctly, after the catch was made by Clark Kent, there was
>almost a minute left in the game (55 seconds I think). Sure enough, D.
>White was marching down the field soon afterwards, until...  "Hacksaw"
>Reynolds sacked him and caused a fumble near the midfield. IMO, the
>sack/fumble was as an important play, since Dallas only needed a field goal
>to win. Does anyone else remember that part of the championship game?

Not only that, but on the previous play, Danny Whit hit Drew Pearson
for a 31 yard gain, and Pearson was tackled by a fingernail in the
back of his jersey by rookie Eric Wright.  It was oh-so-close to
being broken open.

But it was not to be.  Neener neener.
-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
Organization: Senior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 14:29:21 -0500 
From: Vernon H Harmon <vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Chargers Lose

Excerpts from netnews.rec.sport.football.pro: 11-Jan-93 Chargers Lose S.
Hariharan @plains.NoD (582)

> Twin dissappointment today: Eagles and Chargers lose.


Hell, try having all three of your favorite teams eliminated in the same
weekend: Washington, Pittsburgh and San Diego. :(

Of course, it's made even worse by the fact that three of your least
favorite teams *won*: San Fran, Dallas and Buffalo. Thank the football
Gods that the Raiders didn't make the playoffs! :D

Go Fish!!!

--Vernon.
btw: Some Dolfan had a great sign at the game:
"Charge it today, pay back the bills next week!"
:D
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: EVE OF THE BIG GAME: BILLS AND STEELERS
Originator: delarocq@c00515-118rd.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 23:36:45 GMT




   Well, this game is one of my nightmares come true....
   It should be a very exciting contest! I look forward to the
   game! At least we play a class team... unlike who San Diego
   has to play! *snicker*

   Anyway, my prediction for the game:

   Steelers 24 
   Bills    20

   Combined with the revenge factor and the Three Rivers playoff
   history, the Bills are going to need some miracles again. I
   am just trying to be a tad bit reasonable in my predictions..
   This game scares the mess out of me..

   I love it.. Frank "Lloyd" Reich-- The Architect of Comebacks!!!! :)

  
   SQUISH THE FISH.. I HATE EM MORE THAN EVER.. FA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA!!

   (In case you missed it, those *#!@# shirts that the Dolphins had printed
    up before the Houston game.. Week 17)


   COME ON SAN DIEGO!!! JUST DO IT!! :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
1988,1989,1990,1991 AFC East Division Champions
1991,1992 AFC Conference Champions

Squished the Fish .. Monday Night Football, November 16, 1992..

If you are a Buffalo Bills fan, email me at delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu
so we can talk all about the games, insight, etc.
If you are a Packers fan, let me know. I am interested in any news
out of Green Bay...
A PROUD MEMBER OF THE BILLS COALITION THAT TOOK THE BET II.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sgove@Ingres.COM (Stu Gove, Latin America Ops -- x2870)
Subject: Re: Draft stuff
Summary: 
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Keywords: 
Organization: ASK Computer Systems, Ingres Product Division
Date: 8 Jan 93 18:53:48 GMT

In article <21KF03Vdc8c700@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>, tait@uts.amdahl.com (Tait Kirkham)                  writes...
>In article <1iid7vINNqpm@hpscit.sc.hp.com> buds@hpubvwa.nsr.hp.com (Bud Sloan) writes:
>>
>>My prediction:  Seattle will know what New England is going to do
>>BEFORE draft day.  Most times the #1 pick is signed prior to draft
>>day.  If Drew Bledsoe does NOT go to New England, and I understand
>>the Pats are probably going for defense, the Seahawks will take him.
>>If he goes to New England then Seattle will trade DOWN a few slots
>>and hope that Lincoln Kennedy is available.
> 
> 
>I'll say this, if Seattle drafts another QB this high in the first
>round they should have their head examined.  How many times are 
>they going to do that? You have to give Mcguire a chance.  
>Seattle should trade the pick for multiple picks.  They need the help.
> 
If you take a close look at the Hawks -- let's face it, who would want 
to look at a 2-14 team -- they are solid on the defensive side of the 
line.  True, they have paid a big price to find a prime QB, and the sad 
truth is that neither Stouffer nor McGuire fit that role.  The other 
area where they need mondo help is in the O-line.  So, Bud's original 
post hits Seattle's 1st round strategy right on the money.

I personally think that the Pats will go for a D-lineman, leaving 
Bledsoe for the Hawks.  After watching Drew carve up my Huskies in a 
driving snowstorm, I believe he could be the man that makes Seattle 
forget about Dave Krieg!  :-)  Compared to what the Hawks have right now 
at the QB position, they would be nuts not to go for Bledsoe.

Stu
From: v057p7nk@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Andrew W Korbut)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Where do YOU worship on SUNDAY?
Date: 7 Jan 93 03:48:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

< At the Church of the N F L of course! >

Reich is my shepherd; I shall not want,
He makes teams to choke down on green Astroturf,
and leads the Bills beside the waters of the Monongahela
he renews life within the Bills
and for the fan's sake guides Reed down the seam pattern.

Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadow of Three Rivers
I shall fear no defeat, for Frank is with us,
thy arm and thy no-huddle are our comfort.

Thou hast covered the spreads for me to spite mine enemies,
thou hast bathed the head at Rich Stadium with Oil
and my beer mug runneth over.

Hopes of comebacks unfailing, these will follow me
all the days of my life,
and I shall dwell in the REAL house of PAIN
my whole life long.

Amen.

 Dr.D [The Devils Advocate]        "Drinkin' & women & guns don't mix..."
 v057p7nk@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu
 awkorbut@acsu.buffalo.edu                      - Mark Arm
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: REDSKINS
From: rx84335@mcvax4.d48.lilly.com (BENVENGA MARK J)
Date: 4 Jan 1993 13:35 EST  
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Lilly Research Laboratories
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    Lines: 3

 The Redskins will beat the 9ers this week!  There is no coach
 in the game like Joe Gibbs.
From: un036337@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Domes suck
Date: 12 Jan 93 17:08:31 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <C0Cw8D.G5G@news.iastate.edu>, jbhuber@iastate.edu (Joseph B Huber) writes:
> In article <C0CHwL.CAo@ns1.nodak.edu> sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (S. Hariharan )
> writes:
>>As a Viking fan I agree. I think the Vikes have lost their 
>>edge after moving into the Dome. If u look into the history
>>of the Vikes, their glory years in the 1970s, when they
>>were in 4 super bowls, they played outdoors in the frigid
>>Artic cold of Minnesota, where visiting teams have an 
>>obvious disadvantage.  A good team, combined with hostile
>>weather conditions to which only the home team is accustomed
>>should make it a *lethal* combination.
> 
> Saturday would have been a lovely day for outdoor football in Minneapolis:
> temperature of about ~25-30 deg F with freezing drizzle (I was driving by
> Minneapolis around the time that the game was ending on my way back to IA from
> ND). Imagine Salisbury throwing under these conditions......although the
> weather might have caused Washington to drop those interceptions.....
> 
> I think the dome make sense for Minneapolis. The Vikes count on support from
> fans that have to make trips of several hours (for myself, it is a 7 hour
> round trip; for my folks in ND, it is a 12 hour round trip). The dome helps to
> attract these fans, as it sort of guarantees that these people will have a
> pleasant environment in which to watch the game.
> 
> The dome brings a nice advantage of its own...remember that Harbaugh audible
> that a certain reciever didn't hear.
> 
> In Ames, we have a nice outdoor wind tunnel for Iowa State to play football
> in. I enjoy watching games in that stadium. I also like to watch football in
> the Metrodome. For me personally, I like to watch the game; I don't really
> care where it's played.
> 
> -- 
> Joe Huber 
> (jbhuber@iastate.edu)        | Capt. James T. Kirk on the 2nd law of thermo: 
> Dept. of Mech. Egr.          |  "It's not a hundred percent efficient,
> Iowa State University        |   but nothing ever is."

	Well, I happen to think this is bunk.  These people live in this
weather, and I'm sure that if the vikes won ballgames that they would suffer
through, and go to the games.  Now, if you were from Miami, and someone asked
you to suffer outside then you'd say "are you F***ing crazy?", but look at
Green Bay, and Chicago.  Even New England, and Buffalo are in frigid weather,
buit they survive finacially.  Cold weather, warm weather, shit weather, it
doesn't matter.  I can see baseball being played indoors, but football is 100%
an outdoor game, and has no place inside ESPECIALLY in Houston, New Orleans,
and Atlanta.
	Brian Mulholland
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rschwabe@ravel.udel.edu (Robert Josep Schwabe)
Subject: Re: Is ABC clueless? (Dierdork bashing)
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 01:16:09 GMT

Now, I am no fan of Dierdorf, but I will take the Dierdorf of today (an 
announcer who is now more versed with the whole game of footbal) than the     
Dierdorf of two and three years ago.  BOY DID HE SUCK THEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The worst possible announcing team: Terry Bradshaw, Dan Dierdorf, and Joe 
Namath.

Robert J. Schwabe

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Eric West)
Subject: Re: God did Young SUCK!
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 00:55:17 GMT


All I can say is: whew!

The 49ers have had a recent history of choking (i.e., losing as favorites)
in the playoffs after quite respectable seasons (losing to Minnesota five
years ago and to New York two years ago).  Sure, they also won two Super
Bowls in that span of time, but that only makes them .500.  Let's hope they
used up their choking abillity in this game.  :)

Bring on Dallas (and let's try to forget the past)!

ecw
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cowboys KILL Eagles
Date: 12 Jan 1993 19:55:46 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <schnitzi.726858334@eola.cs.ucf.edu> schnitzi@cs.ucf.edu (Mark Schnitzius) writes:
>
>I've posted maybe five or six letters here, all within the past month
>or so.  I really think you have me confused with my brother, who posts
>here frequently.  And he didn't woof, either.  In any case you're full
>of shit.

And you're a typical Eagles fan, your team loses and you
resort to name calling, real mature.  I posted an article
about the game and my opinion about the Eagles' strategy.
If you don't like it, either discuss it rationally or shut
your trap.

>Trash-talking is trash-talking, whether it was before or after the
>game.  If you have something insightful to say, then say it.  And
>since I didn't woof, your accusations are foundless.

I had something insightful to say, and I said it.  You didn't like
it so instead of offering your opinion you've done nothing but attack
me.  Tell me, what have you offered in terms of football information
or even opinion?  Did you even watch the game?


Ray    GO COWBOYS!!!!


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M)
Subject: Greatest Comebacks
Reply-To: dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 17:28:32 GMT

Since we have just witnessed the greatest come-from-behind victory
in NFL history, I thought the net would like some of the previous
games.  Note:  the 49ers held the record for greatest comeback AND
held the (dubious) record for holding the biggest playoff lead that
was lost - until Buffalo broke both of them yesterday.

Biggest Comebacks - Overall

32 - Buffalo vs. Houston (playoffs), Jan 3, 1993 (trailed 35-3,
     won 41-38 in OT)
28 - San Francisco vs. New Orleans, Dec 7, 1980 (trailed 35-7,
     won 38-35 in OT)
25 - St. Louis vs. Tampa Bay, Nov 8, 1987 (trailed 28-3, won
     31-28)

Biggest Comebacks - Playoffs

32 - Buffalo vs. Houston, Jan 3, 1993, wild card (trailed 35-3,
     won 41-38 in OT)
20 - Detroit vs. San Francisco, Dec 22, 1957, divisional playoff
     (trailed 27-7, won 31-27)
18 - Dallas vs. San Francisco, Dec 23, 1972, divisional playoff
     (trailed 21-3, won 30-28)
18 - Miami vs. Cleveland, Jan 4, 1985, divisional playoff
     (trailed 21-3, won 24-21)
15 - Denver vs. Houston, Jan 4, 1991, divisional playoff
     (trailed 21-6, won 26-24)