HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: skanga@prism.poly.edu (Shiraz Kanga)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Upgrading from 1.x-- I want to cry!
Date: 9 Apr 92 03:23:33 GMT
Organization: Polytechnic University, New York

In article <1992Apr7.023823.6828@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <1992Apr7.011241.14628@prism.poly.edu> skanga@prism.poly.edu (Shiraz Kanga) writes:
>>In article <92097.192929RONY@awiwuw11.wu-wien.ac.at> RONY@awiwuw11.wu-wien.ac.at (FLATSCHER Rony) writes:
>>>I cry too. Upgrading from OS/2 1.x to 2.0 is not free in Austria/Europe
>>>either (nor in Germany for that matter either) !
>>What if these people mail their licenses to someone in the US to get a free
>>upgrade (except mailing costs - how much does the entire box weigh?) Is this
>>possible? legal?
>
>It is legal and possible if (a) you are willing to pick up shipping
>costs; (b) you are willing to pick up potential custom duties upon
>arrival in your country; (c) you are willing to use the U.S.-packaged
>version (i.e. with American English manuals); (d) you have a "Proof of
>Purchase" card that is printed in American English (you'll have some
>puzzled faces otherwise at the upgrade center); (e) you have a friend
>in the U.S.; (f) you abide by the terms contained in the upgrade form.
>-- 
>Timothy F. Sipples       Keeper of the OS/2 Frequently Asked Questions
>sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu  List, available via anonymous ftp from
>Dept. of Economics       128.123.35.151, directory pub/os2/faq, or via
>Univ. of Chicago  60637  netmail from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET.

Well then if any of our overseas friends need help in being able to obtain
cheaper upgrades from the USA I will be willing to do the spade-work, of
course subject to the conditions (legalities) mentioned above by Mr Timothy
Sipples (quoted above) But please dont flood my mailbox, okay. Anyway its
not in the stores yet so .....


Happy OS/2 ing

Shiraz

-- 
skanga@prism.poly.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          .sigs waste net.band.width
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sjc28473@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steven Joseph Chmura)
Subject: OS/2 2.0 vs. 32-bit DOS protected
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: comp
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 20:48:56 GMT

Could someone help me understand the advantages of running 32bit os2/2.0 apps
versus 32-bit protected mode dos applications????  I know I know all about
the VM and protection.  I am simply wondering if OS2/2.0 32bit apps
will run significantly faster than the same program compiled under
the 32bit instructions for dos.

-- 
							Steven Chmura
							"4-weeks till..	
							MD-2-B
From: alanr@tekig5.pen.tek.com (Alan N Rovner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Video Vendors that DO support OS/2?
Date: 15 Apr 92 16:33:36 GMT

I've been following the discussion regarding availability of OS/2 SVGA
video drivers and so far am disapointed.  ATI, Diamond, Tseng and others
basically have told the OS/2 user base to get lost.  All right then, are
there any vendors that *do* offer OS/2 SGVA support now or in the near-term
future?  I am about to buy a new video card and this will surely affect my
buying decision.  I will support a company that supports OS/2, and vice versa.

I'd welcome any info.  Thanks and good luck,

Al Rovner
Tektronix Inc.
Test & Measurement Group
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: quan@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Tony Quan)
Subject: Re: i don't like it!!
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Distribution: comp
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 06:21:59 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.1480.11660@dosgate> "bradley grigor" <bradley.grigor@canrem.com> writes:
>I have seen OS/2 2.0 GA and I'm not impressed.  How can I get rid
>of the Workplace Shell??  I _really_ don't like it.  Does OS/2
>2.0 include the original 1.3 PMSHELL somewhere?  As much as I
>hate to say it, Windows 3 (and OS/2 1.3 for that matter) is
>aesthetically much nicer and a darn site easier to use.  This is
>going to take A LOT of getting used to.
>

Both the 1.3 shell and a Windows-like shell are supposed to be there
if you want them.  Don't know how to install them tho...
zrachya
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Diskless Workstations
From: zrachya@ivory.bgu.ac.il (Guy Zrachya)
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1992 15:00:42 GMT
Organization: Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel

  I have been following this list for some time and I got the feeling that
OS/2 is really good but I have some Qs.
  What's seamless windows?

  We have a LAN here with diskless workstations (386/33Mhz, 4Mb ram, Trident
super vga card) that have drive a: 1.2 Mb and drive b: 1.44 Mb. Now, before
I start nagging the net administrator here I'd like to now what support does
OS/2 has for diskless workstations. Can I boot from a floppy and run os/2
through the LAN ?

Thx
Zrachya

Organization: Freshman, Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 03:40:03 -0400 
From: Faisal Nameer Jawdat <fj05+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: OS/2 Key equivalents
	<1992Apr13.045531.8043@cheshire.oxy.edu>

while we're at it...
^N	down one line
^P	up one line
^F	forward one character
^B	back one character
escF	forward one word
escB	back one word
escE	forward one sentence
escA	backward one sentence
esc]	forward one paragraph
esc[	back one paragraph
^E	end of line
^A	beginning of line
^V	down one page
escV	up one page
esc>	beginning of file
esc<	end of file

would be nice to have supported also
:-) for the emacs impaired
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: steverod@owlnet.rice.edu (Steven Harold Rodrigues)
Subject: OS/2 ad sighted!
Summary: And what a depressing start it is...
Keywords: os/2 ads bad bad bad
Organization: Rice University
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 14:33:47 GMT

Houston Chronicle, Monday, 6 April 1992, pg. 6B:

"Leave your office. Boost your productivity."

It's an invite to the OS/2 kickoff party here in Houston, but it's
not terribly interesting.

Were I not looking for it, I would have just skipped it by.

They are having the broadcast from Comdex 12:15-2, which I hope
to make.


I do hope it gets better than this, or people who might otherwise buy OS/2
will fall asleep looking at the ads.

Steve


-- 
Steve Rodrigues          | "... And there is nothing that can captivate, fire
steverod@owlnet.rice.edu | and give wisdom to a noble heart as can a face lit
Rice Computer Science    | with star-lit eyes."
			 | 		- Michelangelo
From: prao@ucsb.edu (Parik Rao)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Whoops... bad driver in CONFIG.SYS
Date: 16 Apr 92 19:10:10 GMT
Reply-To: prao@bluemoon.ucsb.edu
Organization: U.C. Santa Barbara

I've done a bad thing. :-)  I was fooling around with the OS/2 v2.0 requester,
and since they didn't have the driver for the card installed (Cabletron)
I tried a driver I had in my archives (apparently for OS/2 v1.3).  Well,
to make a long story short, the machine crashes hard when the system boots.
Is there ANY way to get back in to edit config.sys?  Or must I <shudder>
re-install OS/2 from scratch?  I never created a bootable floppy (is
that possible?) and the whole drive is on HPFS...

The good news is that the OS/2 v2.0 requester (beta 6, from CI$) seems
fairly nice.  The # of drivers included is VERY limiting, guess I'll have
to dust off my old 3c503 to install.

--
parik rao				                 prao@bluemoon.ucsb.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: bauwens@acs.ucalgary.ca (Luc Bauwens)
Subject: Re: PM Terminal Buglets?
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 00:38:43 GMT
Organization: The University of Calgary, Alberta

In article <1992Apr12.225954.21678@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>I kind of like PM Terminal -- I've sort of gotten used to it.
>However, does anyone know how to minimize the terminal session during
>a file transfer?  While dialing?  The session window blocks everything
>on the desktop, and it gets a bit difficult to navigate around while
>PM Terminal is running.  Most odd.
>
>Actually, there are a number of oddities in PM Terminal.

I take it you mean Softerm.  What's the point of minimizing it
during dialing?  (Won't you have to logon to the remote
machine?  Or do you do that automatically, do you put your
password in a logon file?)

As for when it's running, say downloading in the background, 
in the LA, just clicking on the small square dot on the upper
right corner does the job alright...

My comments about Softerm are of another nature.  For one
thing, the setup menus are very awkward (somehow, I got it
working, but don't ask me how).

Also, I miss the cut-and-paste from Windows terminal, and the buffer
from Windows Terminal; they are very convenient.

It could have more Terminal configuration alternatives, including,
say a couple of Tektronixs graphic modes.  

I am not too knowledgeable about transfer protocols, but on that respect, 
it seems to include a good set of alternatives, including
Kermit (of course), Kermit in server mode, Text files (of course),
Xmodem, Xmodem 1K, Ymodem, Ymodem 1K, Ymodem G, Ymodem G 1K,
(whatever those may be...).

Also, I wish it could let me set up a nicer typeface.

(About my previous complaint with inserting a ^M when in vi
on the Unix host, thanks to all the folks who told me
to use the keyboard mapping facility to change the Enter
key from [LF] to [CR].  It's now fine.].

Luc B.
From: Changhao_Boh@mindlink.bc.ca (Changhao Boh)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: When will ATI Ultra Drivers be avialable ??
Date: 17 Apr 92 21:45:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: mindlink.11489
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada

Hi,

  Doe anyone has any new/rumours as to when ATI Ultra drivers for OS2 2.0 will
be avialable or if they are indeed building drivers for OS2.

  I know that I can use the 8514/A driver now but will it switch to the default
1024x768 mode ?  I only have a standard VGA (640x480) monitor.

  As far as I know, Windows 3.1's 8514/A driver refused to drive the ATI Ultra
at 640x480x256 colours.  This problem is sloved by having the appropriate
Windows 3.1 specific driver.

  I am eagerly awaiting OS/2 2.0.

Good Health.

Changhao
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim)
Subject: GA directory move bug?
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 23:05:40 GMT

I started playing with GA and WPS last night.  After restoring my
backups, my directory for PBMPLUS 32-bit (VCPI) for DOS ended up
on my HPFS partition.  So I open up my HPFS drive icon, picked up
the folder/directory, and dropped it on the DOS/FAT drive icon
(I assumed this was the correct way to do it, it sure feels
intuitive to me :).

A window declaring that the folder was going to be moved popped up
so I left it running in the background.  The PBMPLUS directory only
had about 130 files in it, mostly short manual files.  After about
a minute it was obvious something was wrong.  I opened an OS/2 window
and did a directory of my DOS/FAT partition and found 14MB of disk
space had disappeared.  I closed the move window, but the copying
kept going on.  After about 3 minutes of copying, I shutdown WPS
(the copying kept going on while shutdown was doing its thing).

I rebooted and looked in the DOS/FAT partition.  WPS had copied
the PBMPLUS directory along with most of the files.  But all files
after a certain point had been changed into directories (i.e. the
file README.DOS and all following files had been turned into
directories).  Furthermore, when I looked into these new directories,
they each had a copy of all the files which had successfully copied
into the PBMPLUS directory.  No wonder my drive had been grinding
for 3 minutes!

After I cleaned this mess up, I tried it again.  Same result.  Is
this a bug?  If it's a feature, I'd sure like to know what it's for.
-- 
John H. Kim                 | (This space to be filled when I
jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu | think of something very clever 
uunet!jarthur!jokim         | to use as a disclaimer)
From: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: News from L.A. OS/2 Celebration and COMDEX announcement
Date: 8 Apr 92 04:13:21 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

Did anyone else notice Lee's frequent use of the phrase "on Intel platforms"?
He was clearly implying that more platforms are coming. It was transparent
I thought.

Bob
-- 
Bob Cain    rcain@netcom.com   408-358-2007

"There are some strings.  They're just not attached."
                                                    Victoria Roberts
From: horan@ecs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: V2 upgrade installation
Date: 6 Apr 92 10:51:26 GMT

When I get my upgrade from 1.3, can I reformat, (read delete windows and dos)
partition, and do what ever I like to my drive as I install v2.

or do I have to install v2 over 1.3 as in the case of DoS upgrades?

(I'm speeking about the free upgrade from 1.3 to 2.0

5000
Gregg Horan
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: CAD under GA...?
Date: 13 Apr 92 22:34:12 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1992Apr13.160146.54441@cc.usu.edu> slhpv@cc.usu.edu writes:
>I hate to add traffic to this newsgroup, but here it goes...
>What 1280x1024 cards are supported/announced by OS/2?
>(Don't like windows, so don't need seamless support)

Orchid apparently has drivers in the works for their Farenheit 1280
board.  Diamond, same story, Stealth VRAM.

And there's IBM's Image Adapter/A for Microchannel machines for a
higher end approach.

>What tablets are supported/announced?

No idea on this one.  Anyone?

>Will Autocad work under OS/2 or do I have to dual-boot to dos?

Releases 10 and 12 will work (the former is available for OS/2, the
latter is in beta).  Release 11 currently will not because it uses a
VCPI DOS extender.

>What does the OS/2 V2 Developer's Toolkit contain?  (is $119 a good price?)

Best asked in comp.os.os2.programmer.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples       Keeper of the OS/2 Frequently Asked Questions
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu  List, available via anonymous ftp from
Dept. of Economics       128.123.35.151, directory pub/os2/faq, or via
Univ. of Chicago  60637  netmail from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Subject: Re: Is OS2/2.0-DOS faster than plain Dos??
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 18:44:30 GMT

davidh@towers.rn.com (David Holland) writes:
>Well, just an example, a very old copy of norton utilities SI reports
>approx 51.2 on a 486/33 as its computing index, however under
>OS/2 2.0 in a Dos window I managed only 18.x.

This would be especially understandable if you have a fast memory
cache.  In DOS it's just sitting there running SI, with OS/2 it goes
off and does something else while the test is running.  So yeah, I'd
expect to see some performance loss on short tight loops.
-- 
Girls just wanna have fun... Guys just wanna have girls.
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Need some ADVISE: OS/2  OR WIN31?
Date: 16 Apr 92 13:20:29 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Apr15.234248.17198@cs.dal.ca> andre@ug.cs.dal.ca (Andre Wong) writes:
>I am using a 386/25 with  a 100mb hd and  4 mb ram and am deciding 
>to  buy os/2 2.0 or windows 3.1. It seems  that os/2 is much  more
>powerful but I doubt if I can  get good results from  my configuration.
>I have  heard people saying that running  os/2  with  4mb is such a pain
>and is damn  slow when you switching from one application to another.
>So  before  i  get  more RAM, would windows 3.1 be faster for my system?
>Is  os/2 really that slow with 4mb  ram?

What do you plan on doing?  Even with Windows 3.0, I've found that 4MB
isn't adequate for the level of work I do with it.  4MB will work with
OS/2 if you don't install a disk cache or HPFS.  One or two
applications at a time shouldn't be a problem that way.  

You'll probably want to upgrade to 8MB even if you stay with Windows.

Not having used Windows 3.1, I can't compare them.



-- 
David Charlap                   Q:"Where do these stairs go?"
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu          A:"They go up"
----------------------------
Hi! I am a .signature virus. Copy me into your .signature to join in!
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: protein@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Chris Blackmon)
Subject: Re: Help me install OS/2 on a Clone...
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 20:14:27 GMT

feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel) writes:

>harris@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Michael Harris) writes:

>>adhir@cygnus.umd.edu (Alok Dhir) writes:

>>>Why don't you get a copy of 'COUNTRY.SYS'? <grin>... 

>The "missing country.sys" error message is often the result of
>trying to install OS/2 with insufficient memory. Take your system up to
>8 megs and this message will probably go away.

The system has 8 megs of ram.  It also has a 130meg hd.

>-- 
>David Feustel N9MYI, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805. (219)482-9631
>= Candidate Bush wouldn't recognize principle if he were standing upon it =
Chris Blackmon, N4VGK		||  In this business, you either lead, follow
protein@catt.ncsu.edu		||  or get the hell out of the way.

"pour aller ou personne n'est jamais alle'...."
From: linville@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (John W. Linville)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Tape Backup ?
Date: 7 Apr 92 15:26:19 GMT
Organization: NCSU CATT Prog

In article <1992Apr07.064846.2473@rose.uucp> bill.dehaan@rose.uucp (bill dehaan) writes:
>Me, three. I currently run FAT on all drives, purely because HPFS  files
>cannot be backed up. I just bought a Colorado in January, I'll be damned
>if I will back up OS/2 files to floppy.
>
>Would the QIC-80 format support HPFS and EA?

There is built-in support for OS/2 EAs in the QIC-40/80 standards (at least 
that is the way I read them).

John W. Linville




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  John W. Linville                Amateur radio:  KD4KHC                  |
|  #include "std_disclaimer.h"     E-mail:  linville@catt.ncsu.edu         |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: soh3@quads.uchicago.edu (min-woong sohn)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Can't open c drive and can't start programs on c
Date: 16 Apr 92 17:32:07 GMT
Reply-To: soh3@midway.uchicago.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

Hi, I am trying to install os/2 2.0 GA version (I got it for free
at Comdex) on my Compaq 20 Mhz with 5 meg memory and 300 meg disk
space.  I cannot open c drive and cannot run dos programs off of
c drive.  I have tried to install it correctly three times already
without much luck.  I get the message that Access is denied whenever
I try to launch dos program on c.  D drive is fine.  Any help will
be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Min
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: quan@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Tony Quan)
Subject: Re: Can OS/2 V2.0 GA be installed from drive B?
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 06:20:34 GMT

In article <29E4E830.96EE@tct.com> jtt@tct.com (John Tombs) writes:
>The subject says it all.
>

When I ordered OS/2 2.0, the operator said no.  According to him,
you have to install from the boot drive.  Of course, now someone
with GA will come along and contradict me. :)

--Tony
quan@cs.stanford.edu
From: bgm@cray.com (Bert Moshier)
Subject: Re: OS/2 Intro in NYC was Impressive!
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Distribution: na
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:03:33 CDT

In article <1992Apr3.031845.4554@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> liggio@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Vincent J. Liggio) writes:
>In article <1992Apr1.192042.29540@cbnewsm.cb.att.com> heiland@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (david.j.heiland) writes:
>>Any more details on the show??
>
>Well, I was there with Seb at the show, and it wasn't really a show off of
>OS/2.  It was more of a look at these quick demos, and then let's have an
>hour of questions.  They showed 2 seamless windows, 2 DOS programs, 1 OS/2
>16 bit, and 1 OS/2 32 bit program (44 sec vs 26 sec for a calculation,
>respectively).  And After Dark, running on the OS/2 desktop, as a windows
>app.  After that they had Q&A with a video link to Boca.  Just a bunch of
>people asking quesitons which have been answered here many times before
>(NYPC sponsered it, but they didn't yet have their OS/2 SIG set up yet, so
>that could explain it).  Then they gave away 12 books, 13 copies of OS/2
>2.0 ES, and the new color IBM laptop (but I didn't win :-(.  I think that
>the Super Demo Tuesday that I am attending at the IBM building in Manhatten
>will be much better, as there will be hands on demos, 20 ISV's to present
>new software, and a live Comdex link.  I'll happily update everyone next
>Tuesday after we get back.
>
>Vince

Vince:

I just got back from COMDEX where IBM showed:

  - Clips from the NYC meeting!  Really impressive!
  - Windows 3.1 applications running under OS/2 2.0 (next driver)!
  - All the other things we know OS/2 2.0 has including OLE for Windows

All for an $49 upgrade from Windows.

Bert Moshier
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Subject: Re: Infoworld Headlines
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 08:49:20 GMT

chris@atl.scscom.com (Chris Boaro) writes:

>Well, my April 6th Infoworld showed up today. The good news is that OS/2
>2.0 had 2 front page headlines, the bad news is that they were:

And to add insult to injury, they spent the rest of the issue tealking
about how fantastic and godlike Windows 3.1 was...
-- 
If you can count your money, you don't have a billion dollars. -- J. Paul Getty
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: ATM
Keywords: ATM, fonts, small green things from mars
Date: 16 Apr 92 18:04:42 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1992Apr16.172615.7497@sun3.vlsi.waterloo.edu> pundsack@vlsi.waterloo.edu (Mark Pundsack) writes:
>So ATM will print out nice stuff on your printer.  I've been told that
>WinOS2 makes use of the built-in ATM.  However, I have a problem.  I have a
>Canon BJ 10ex.  It does 360 dpi, but I only have a Windows 3.0 driver.  It
>also emulates an Epson LQ 510 which is 180 dpi.  I can probably use the
>Epson driver under OS/2.  That means that I can use ATM at 180 dpi.
>However, I want to use ATM (from OS/2) at 360 dpi under Windows using the
>Windows driver for the BJ.  Is this possible?  to use a Windows printer
>driver and OS/2's ATM?  It would be OK if the 360 dpi driver was limited
>to Windows software.

Yes indeed.  Win-OS/2 is essentially a full Windows 3.0 environment
(well, quasi-3.1, actually, but that's supposed to be a secret :-)).
I'm using a Windows 3.0 640x480 256 color driver for my Trident card
-- works great (full screen, of course).  Printer drivers for Windows
3.0 also work fine under Win-OS/2.  Of course printing from OS/2
programs won't go through this driver, but printing from your Windows
applications will.
-- 
Timothy F. Sipples       Keeper of the OS/2 Frequently Asked Questions
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu  List, available via anonymous ftp from
Dept. of Economics       128.123.35.151, directory pub/os2/faq, or via
Univ. of Chicago  60637  netmail from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET.