HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v3bx@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Krishnan Ramaswamy)
Subject: Re: Who is Sachin Tendulkar (The Rising Star)!
Organization: University of New Brunswick
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 12:38:14 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.012811.20458@rice.edu> pvr@argo.rice.edu (PVR Narasimha Rao) writes:
>
>In article <1992Apr14.164638.1408@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, mhusain@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Muqtada Husain) writes:
>
>|>    I received this thru a personal mail from one of my friends. I don't know
>|> who wrote this originally, but I am posting it as it is makes an interseting 
>|> reading about an emerging star of nineties (Sachin Tendulkar). Hope you will
>|> enjoy this.
>
>|> where all the indian batsmen had failed, Sachin was a headache to all the 
>|> Pakistani bowlers. So much so that Waqar Younis even tried to get him injured 
>|> by bowling a barrage of bouncers, Imran was totally useless,even with his 
>
>
>|> bouncers! Sachin played on even with blood on his face, he couldn't care less. 
>He got unjured (in the nose) by a bouncer from Waqar Younis (or was it Aaqib?)
>and played a very good innings. Having come at 37/4 in the second innings on the
>fourth day, he played very lusty innings. He scored 2 nice boundaries in the same
>over in which he got injured.
>
>--------
>PVR Narasimha Rao

 I juz wanted to point out something.  Yes it was a delivery from Waqar that
bloodied Tendulkar's nose.  However I do not know if one calls that a bouncer.
It was a short pitched delivery alright, but the ball actually climbed off the 
edge of Tendulkar's bat as he defended that short pitched delivery and struck his nose. So I don't think it is fair to blame Waqar for anything . (And  there's nothing wrong if he had bowled that intentionally too). In fact as one of the 
commentators pointed out ( Zaheer it was I think ), the ball could hav gone 
anywhere after it hit the edge of the bat . ( It did find it a bit sickening 
when Zaheer said that Tendulkar was lucky that the ball did not carry to the 
slips  , at a time when his injury was being attended to. But I realised that 
what he said was true !!). Ironically if the ball had not struck his nose
and had indedd gone to the slip cordon (and was caught ) , India might have
lost the match. SO indirectly, India owe the draw to Sachin's injury !! :-)

 Next thing we know , folks would be blaming WInston Benjamin for the freak 
accident in which Manjrekar got injured in his first test !!! :-)

Krishnan
From: rajiv@dvorak.amd.com (Rajiv Malhotra)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: WI news
Date: 16 Apr 92 22:20:45 GMT
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Austin, Texas

In article <kuooasINNaak@news.bbn.com> ckhan@BBN.COM (Chico Kahn (Room # 20/317 B)) writes:
>In article <1992Apr6.181554.20604@casbah.acns.nwu.edu> sidi@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Sadiq Yusuf) writes:
>
>With Hooper's position appearing more and more tenuous, it would appear
>that we may soon see a West Indies team without a Guyanese player in
>it.  Looks like we'll have to wait for Paul Persaud to replace somebody
>or maybe ...
>
>Chico.

Why do you think Hooper's position is appearing tenuous? He may
not have been spectacular with the bat, but he bowled very well in
WC. With his all round abilities, Hooper can be a very worthy
member of the team. BTW, why was he dropped from the present 
ODI team?

Rajiv



-- 
  
--- There is no future in time travel.
 
****     Rajiv Malhotra    ***
From: az1@ukc.ac.uk (A.Zafar)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: RE : AKRAM'S DELIVERY
Date: 6 Apr 92 09:39:28 GMT
Reply-To: az1@ukc.ac.uk (A.Zafar)
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.

In article <69832@ut-emx.uucp> salman@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Salman B. Ashraf) writes:
>
>The ball that bowled Lamb was, in my opinion, better than the one
>that got Lewis. Akram had previously shown some big inswingers
>and also has a reputation for producing them whenever he bowls
>rounds the wicket. The ball he bowled to Lamb was held in his
>hand as one would for an outswinger, but the arm action made in
>come into Lamb in the air, and Lamb, expecting it to move in even
>further, played very slightly inside the line and had his
>offstick uprooted. Once the ball had landed on the pitch the
>natural forces (wind, pitch) took over and because of the
>incoming trajectory, it just went straight on. 

	Actually, I think it was not the natural forces that really made the
ball cut away. The way the ball left his wrist, it seemed like a genuine leg
cutter to me. What ever the case, I think it was unlucky for Lamb.
 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: jager@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Riaan de Jager)
Subject: SA vs. WINDIES HEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLPPPPPP!!!!
Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 07:44:37 GMT
Summary: SA vs WINDIES

All those of you who were so active in posting scores in the WC,\
please do so with SA Windies! It's my only access to Cricketing
civilization!
  
  Thanx
  Riaan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: urajan@leland.Stanford.EDU (Uday Rajan)
Subject:  Sobers.
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 04:42:01 GMT

In article <1992Mar31.210939.5712@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> ramprasa@glycol.ecn.purdue.edu (Ramprasad Ramakrishna) writes:

>Sobers ...best innings however, was the 254 against Australia for the world
> XI. He showed how to kill Lillie and Thommo's bowling at their best.

This was in 1971-72, when a World XI was made up to tour Australia after
South Africa had been forced to withdraw. I'm pretty sure Thomson did not
play in that series (or, if he did, he was nowhere near the force he 
was to become later in 1974-77). Also, I think that may have been Lillee's 
first exposure to international cricket. He was probably at his fastest, but
arguably not at his best. 
There is an interesting side-story about that Sobers innings. In the previous
"Test", Lillee had taken 8/29 and had destroyed the World XI. Tony Greig 
mentions in his book that, before picking up his gloves to go out to bat,
Sobers said something about hitting a century that day. And he did, in fine 
style.
From: skm9216@zeus.tamu.edu (NAME=SANJAY MANDAL)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: WI/SA OD 1 after 5 overs
Date: 7 Apr 92 19:17:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <9204071518.AA29395@cs.utexas.edu>, KSRAO@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu writes...
> 
>       After 5 overs WI are 25 for no loss in their first ODI at Jamaica
>against West Indies.
How WI is playing against WI? It should be SA.

 After seeing baseball-style costumes, it was a treat to
>see cricketers playing in whilte. The game started at 9:30am CDT (10:30 EDT and
>7:30 PDT) and should go on till 5:30 CDT unless it is finished earlier.
> 
>       For those of you with an access to a satellite dish, the game is coming
>now on W5/22.
> 
>K. Sankara Rao
From: karnik@cs.umn.edu (Neeran Mohan Karnik)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: A gist of the interviews - Prabhakar, Kapil, Baig....
Date: 10 Apr 92 18:11:12 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.


	Just as an aside, Manoj Prabhakar has said since his (in)famous
interview with Pataudi, that he did not criticise Azhar's captaincy or advocate
his removal, but was simply replying to Pataudi's questions!

	The BCCI secretary also said the next day, that Prabhakar's comments
were not a violation of the contract, and that the matter was not even discussed
at the committee's meeting, so that there is no question of taking any 
disciplinary action.


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Neeran  Karnik - Dept. of Computer Science, University of Minnesota
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: dlow@sirius.ucs.adelaide.edu.au.ua.oz (David J Low)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: an intesting question...
Date: 13 Apr 92 00:20:52 GMT

From article <1992Apr12.234347.1240@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>, by v3bx@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Krishnan Ramaswamy):
> In article <kuhcjeINNkq5@aludra.usc.edu> sukhatme@usc.edu (Gaurav Sukhatme) writes:
>>Describe how a bowler can get three wickets in a single match of three consecutive balls - in other words a hatrick - with the proviso that all the three deliveries are from different overs.

> One way is
> In the 1st innings
> ******************
> Bowler gets a wicket off the last delivery of Over 1
> He gets a second wicket off the first delivery of his next over
> (And assume that that was the last wicket to fall in the 1st innings)
> In the 2nd innings
> *******************
> He gets a wicket off the first delivery that he bowls in the second innings
> 
> As for the question if this has ever happened in a first class match ,
> well I do know that there hav been hat tricks spread over the 2 innings.
> But I am not sure if they were distributed over 3 overs. ( Courtney Walsh
> took a hat trick in AUstralia once I guess. Could that hav on these lines ??)

     Merv Hughes has certainly performed the above trick, against the West
     Indies.  From memory, the unluck third victim was Greenidge, who had to
     open the innings facing a fired up Merv, upset over an incident in the
     Australian innings (one of the bowlers got hit in the head near the
     close).  This particular trick was spread over about 3 days......

		   David.

--
   ___          ~~            | David J. Low, Atmospheric Group, Dept. Physics
  /  /-----^-/~~~             | Adelaide University, South Australia 
 /  /-------/~  "I'll be back"| 
<__/  '            --- Arnie  | E-Mail : dlow@physics.adelaide.edu.au
From: ss511583@longs.LANCE.ColoState.EDU (Sohban Shahid)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: good news about pakistan team!!!!
Date: 10 Apr 92 01:43:12 GMT
Reply-To: ss511583@longs.LANCE.ColoState.EDU (Sohban Shahid)
Organization: Engineering College, Colorado State University


 M.Ali.Hanif  writes:
>
>
>P.S. Does God bowl fast out-swingers or off-cutters?
>

Arun  writes
 > Neither, but, he does send rain after a dismal batting performance :-) :-)
 >:o) :@) etc.


God bowls late out swingers and sometimes heartbreaking  yorkers.
Loooooks  very dejected after his teams performance.  Arun why feel 
shy in accepting the reality. We are proud that what Pakistani
team has obtained on 25 th March was long time before predicted
by great  Sunil Gavasker.

----------------------------------------------------
SOHBAN SHAHID              e-mail ss511583@longs.lance.ColoState.Edu
Civil Engg. Dept.                    (303) 491 5844/8204 (work)
Colorado State University (303) 224 0397  (home)
Ft. Collins, CO-80523
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: test@fcit-c1.fcit.monash.edu.au (Testing account for network)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: David Gower
Date: 8 Apr 92 01:17:16 GMT
Organization: FCIT, Monash University

Ah, that languid insouciance, will we ever see his like again?

We should have listened to Bob Willis, should have kept him playing until 
his average goes under forty (which will never happen) or until the day he 
retires.

"Watching David Gower for five minutes is better than watching anybody else 
bat the entire day." - The World.

Nudd
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: pvr@argo.rice.edu (PVR Narasimha Rao)
Subject: Re: A gist of the interviews - Prabhakar, Kapil, Baig....
Followup-To: <9204100732.AA05806@argo.rice.edu>
Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 06:09:23 GMT


In article <9204100732.AA05806@argo.rice.edu>, I wrote:

|> In article <00958CB8.5F771AC0@vms.csd.mu.edu>, 9063iyerm@vms.csd.mu.edu (Murali
|> Iyer) writes:
|>
|> > admits to relying on luck and reflexes to succeed). He points out that he has
|> > scored about 600 runs in 19 OD matches which is not bad.  He says he is happy
|> 
|> He scored 488 in the last 18 matches, as far as my calculation goes. He didn't
|> score well in the second match against SA (he scored 59 in the third one). So
|> it can't be 600 in 19. It'll be 510-530 in 19.
|> 
|> Anyway, his performance in the last season in ODIs was next only to SRT's
|> (overall). He scored 313 runs at 31.3 to SRT's 401 at 44.56. He was clearly
|> better than all others. Perhaps, he has a point when he says he has not done a
|> bad job.

I have a small correction. I thought I didn't have the score card for the second
ODI against SA. But I realized that I have it.

Srikkanth made 68 runs in that match and that makes his tally in the last 19 ODIs
(2 vs SA, 10 in WSC and 7 in WC) (he didn't play in the first ODI vs SA) * 556 *. 
Also, Srikkanth has the maximum # of MoM's by any Indian since November 1991.

--------
PVR Narasimha Rao
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: mhusain@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Muqtada Husain)
Subject: Re: Who is Sachin Tendulkar (The Rising Star)!
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 13:11:51 GMT

In article <14APR199215530362@zeus.tamu.edu> fdm0886@zeus.tamu.edu (Faraaz) writes:
>In article <1992Apr14.164638.1408@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, mhusain@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Muqtada Husain) writes...
>
>.stuff deleted
>
>The article concerned Sachin Tendulkar!
>
>>   His mentality for the game is most evident when he played in Pakistan, 
>>undoubtedly the most difficult and hostile playing grounds in the world. At a 
>>time when Imran Khan Waqar Younis and Wasim Akram (Probably the best trio of 
>>pace attack in the world) are at their hostile best, and where Imran is 
>>reported to have said '" ... abe hindustani pehle cricket khelna seekh...", 
>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>please cite your source...... If it is an untruth, do not spread rumours.
   *****************************************************************


	Once again I would like to assert that I did not write this article,
so I can't answer any questions as to the veracity of this or any other part
of it.


             
>
>>where all the indian batsmen had failed, Sachin was a headache to all the 
>                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>granted...
>
>>Pakistani bowlers. So much so that
>>Waqar Younis even tried to get him injured by bowling a barrage of bouncers, 
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Intimidatory bowling is the law of the land on all home grounds. Waqar was in
>all likelyhood not raging a personal vendetta on Tendulkar, nor was the team.
>I am sure if India had the bowlers of the calibre of Pakistan they would not
>complain of intimidatory bowling............
>
>>Imran was totally useless,even with his 
>>bouncers! Sachin played on even with blood on his face, he couldn't care less. 
>>I think he scored 67.
>		   ^^
>admirably....
>
>>   I have always felt that Pakistan plays dirty cricket in Pakistan,but not for
> 					   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>I'm sure you mean "intimidatory", but we've already mentioned that havn't we....
>
>>Sachin after the test series he considered the Pakistani bowlers to be,lets say
>>very good and very difficult, nothing else.



Muqtada Husain
From: KSRAO@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: WI/SA OD2 SA after 25 overs
Date: 11 Apr 1992 10:30:14 -0500
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

     WI won the toss and sent SA to bat. Ambrose bowled 4 wides in the first
over and rwo in the second. He got Wessels caught by Williams off a ball which
would have been a wide had Wessels left it alone.

     Hudson was out off a brilliant throw from Simmons which hit the stupms.
Hudson hit the ball to Simmons and he fielded and threw it to hit the stupms.


Hudson 6  run out  (25)
Wessels c William b Ambrose 1
Kirsten c Benjamin b Cummins
Kuiper  not out
Cronje run out
Rhodes  not out

81 for 4

     SA team is: Wessels, Hudson, Kirsten, Kuiper, Richardson, Henry, Snell,
Pringle, Donald, Cronje and Rhodes

      WI team has Patterson and Harper in place of Hooper and Logie


Rao
From: azhar@duke.cs.duke.edu (D. Salman [Quintessential] Azhar)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Windies versus Safrica: 1st ODI
Keywords: Windies win
Date: 8 Apr 92 23:50:30 GMT
Organization: Duke University Computer Science Dept.; Durham, N.C.


	   Windies (~270) beat Safrica (~190) in the first ODI. Simmons
scored a centruy while Hudson was the leading scorer for Safrica.
Could some Windian or Safrican netter please give us more info on the
series. 

Salman [no time for words] Azhar


-- 
``I will pass you in a small boat trapped by stormy seas, without
saying a word. Perhaps, there is nothing to say, and there is no time
for words. In these situations, words lose their meanings.''
          ----- D. Salman [Quintessential] Azhar
From: mare2@husc3.harvard.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Massachusetts Cricket
Date: 12 Apr 92 23:34:59 GMT
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

Does anybody know if there are any cricket teams or competitions 
in the Boston/Massachusetts Area?  Are there any qualified cricket coaches
in the area, or are there any jobs for one? (Ex County player/NCA coach
is interested in finding out)
From: gcoates@spam.ua.oz (Geoff Coates)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: great catches
Date: 16 Apr 92 00:47:23 GMT
Organization: Statistics, Pure & Applied Mathematics, University of Adelaide

This one may have already been mentioned but Gatting's catch to dismiss
Dennis Lillee at Headingly in 1981 was a beauty and made more so by the
circumstances. I'm sure everyone knows the story, Willis wreaking havoc
as Australia chases a modest total but Bright and Lillee taking command
for a few productive overs of intelligent ninth wicket hitting. Finally
Lillee mishits to mid on who is deep and apparantly unable to reach but
Gatting dives full length to pick it up in his fingertips at ground
level. First ball of his next over Willis takes Bright's middle stump for
a walk to end the match.

Geoff Coates
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: v3bx@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Krishnan Ramaswamy)
Subject: Re: an intesting question...
Organization: University of New Brunswick
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 23:43:47 GMT

In article <kuhcjeINNkq5@aludra.usc.edu> sukhatme@usc.edu (Gaurav Sukhatme) writes:
>Describe how a bowler can get three wickets in a single match of three consecutive balls - in other words a hatrick - with the proviso that all the three deliveries are from different overs.
>
>									Gaurav
>

One way is

In the 1st innings
******************

Bowler gets a wicket off the last delivery of Over 1

He gets a second wicket off the first delivery of his next over

(And assume that that was the last wicket to fall in the 1st innings)


In the 2nd innings
*******************

He gets a wicket off the first delivery that he bowls in the second innings


Ooops, sorry , all along I have used 'He' . Could be women's cricket too !!

As for the question if this has ever happened in a first class match ,
well I do know that there hav been hat tricks spread over the 2 innings.
But I am not sure if they were distributed over 3 overs. ( Courtney Walsh
took a hat trick in AUstralia once I guess. Could that hav on these lines ??)

Krishnan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@khayyam.bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi)
Subject: Re: Miandad blasts Imran khan
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: 10 Apr 92 20:24:31

In article <kubgteINN2gn@sal-sun102.usc.edu> rammohan@usc.edu (Karthikeyan Rammohan) writes:

   In the Indian Express and the Hindu dated 10th april, there has been a
   big article in which miandad blasts imran khan for taking credit for
   winning the world cup.He is stated to have said that, "there was no way
   in which Imran contributed to Pakistan winning the World cup.He did
   not play any cricket for the past 1 year, either test or local
   cricket.He is more a liability to Pakistan than an asset".It was a big
   article and i dont remember all his comments.

   I don't think this is surprising as it was a weel know fact that Imran
   and Javed don't get along well at all.

   could anyone provide more details on this juicy matter?

   source:Call from India

Yes, here are the details from the Daily Garbage. In light of
Vengsarkar, Prabhakar, Pataudi and Bedi criticizing Azhar and blaming
him for India's bad showing in the Aussie tour and the WC, Miandad
reportedly said that such criticism and behavior had opened a new
world in his thinking and that he had found the courage to criticise
Imran Khan. The paper goes on to report, apparently, that both Azhar
and Imran are quite disturbed at this trend in otherwise meek and
well-behaved players such as Miandad and Prabhakar. "What next" Azhar
supposedly asked Imran "Is More going to start making some noise
also?" 

source: call from Pakistan. 
--
	--SAN
From: ee00shc@unccvax.uncc.edu (SHAILESH CHINCHALKAR)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Imran and Miandad
Keywords: Controversy
Date: 15 Apr 92 19:06:58 GMT
Organization: University of NC at Charlotte


I heard that Miandad critisised Imran in an interview(minor) which was publishedin Indian newspapers(Indian Express??).

He said that Imran should not take the credit of their WC win and should not
comment on Pak's selection because he hadn't played any cricket in Pakistan
before the WC for more than 5 years (except test/1-day). 

He also said that Imran did not play any major role in Pak's win but still was
given the credit.(this may not be the exact statement)

Whatever Miandad says, I think both did play MAJOR ROLES for their win but in
different ways.Imran was a superb leader/captain without whom Pak would not have
performed well in crucial situations(as in other 1-days/tests before WC).WhereasMiandad was the one who controlled their batting throughout the World Cup when
Malik(who was supposed to be their no. 1 batsman) was out of form.

And even though it is a fact that these two differ in every way on and off the  field there is one thing nobody will forget - how they get along with each otherwhen involved in crucial partnership.

Perhaps the "turning point" of the finals was their BIG PARTNERSHIP after a verybad start.Had one of them got out quickly Pak would not have scored more than
200 and then Akram and company couldn't have done much.    

Anyway The Great KHAN is on the peak of his captaincy and would retire in recentfuture. I'm sure it will be a great loss to Pak's cricket though it's the best 
time to retire.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@khayyam.bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi)
Subject: Re: Who should be India's vice captain? (Re: Reflections on the ...)
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: 7 Apr 92 16:33:30

In article <9204070429.AA21604@sawwhet.owlnet.rice.edu> pvr@rice.edu (Narasimha Pvr) writes:

[stuff about SRT, Majrekar or Azhar as captain deleted]

I believe India should change captains for a variety of reasons, the
strongest being that Prabhakar's criticism is symptomatic of deep
divisions within th team. Azhar can not now be sure of loyalty and
respect from anybody on the team. How do we know how the others really
feel? It is a fact that the captaincy has weighed heavy on Azhar's
batting. Nobody can afford to lose a batsman of Azhar's class, so we
must not make him captain. The only other real choice is Kapil:

1. He is the only one to command unquestioned respect (Well, Shastri
may still whine). 

2. He has the experience. 

3. His will become more responsible with his batting; I have often
felt that undue haste and aggression has been his downfall more often
than not.

--
	--SAN
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Monday, 6 Apr 1992 09:47:19 CDT
From: <U17868@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Pak vs Aus 1976 series

Does anyone (specially in Australia) know from where I can get the highlights (
if possible) of the Pakistan vs Australia test series of 1976. If yes, please,
send me email at u17868@uicvm.bitnet with the address and phone number of the
source.
Sikander Waheed
University of Illinois at Chicago
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket