HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1992 20:18:14 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Maurice Rich <M.Rich@ITC.GU.EDU.AU>
Subject:      Re: Virus protection for Netware
              at Sep 10, 92 12:31 pm

John Hendriks said ...
>
> To all those who asked about McAfees' virus protection NLM. It can be
> found under MSDOS_UPLOADS on wuarchive.wustl.edu. I seem to remember
> someone once saying that though LANProtect was good its detection of
> viruses was not as comprehensive as it could be (ie joke and trojan)
> and that McAfee (now that its an NLM) and F-Protect are better
> prospects.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> John D. Hendriks             |  Internet
> Faculty of Medicine          |
> University of Newcastle      |   : jdh@medicine.newcastle.edu.au
> NSW 2308 Australia           |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

What is the File name ??  I had a look around the MSDOS_UPLOADS hierarchy
and could not see anything that looked like it may be the above...

--
Maurice H. Rich		maurice@itc.gu.edu.au   M.Rich@itc.gu.edu.au
Technical Officer				Ph  +61 7 875 7851
Information Technology Centre			Fax +61 7 875 7877
Griffith University,  Nathan,  Brisbane,  QLD,  Australia. 4122
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Resource Protection Department
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R3).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 15:26:06 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Ray Todd Stevens <RAY@SAFETY.NWSCC.SEA06.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Re: Clones

>Perhaps with IBM's new policy of making their own clones, we will be
>able to afford IBMs in the future.

Not a good hope.  When I worked for a network intigration firm we
factored a 75% DOA rate into any installation which used IBM
equipment.  This was usually right on the ball.  If IBM's clones are
as much worse than their machines as they claim that other clones are
(and aren't) you should see a 200% DOA rate.

Ray Todd Stevens
Safety Dept NWSC Crane
Ray@safety.nwscc.sea06.navy.mil
(812) 854-3292  854-3294  854-3289
      854-3293  854-3482
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 08:15:49 +0200
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Babsch@MAIN01.RZ.UNI-ULM.DE
Subject:      Re: Odd problem with Win 3.1 & RPL

In article <9209080035.AA09649@qld.tne.oz.au> you write:
>Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
>Path:
 news.uni-ulm.de!News.BelWue.DE!ira.uka.de!yale.edu!jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!ukm
 a!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!QLD.TNE.OZ.AU!EQ01893
>References: <NOVELL%92090522354457@SUVM.SYR.EDU>
>Message-ID: <9209080035.AA09649@qld.tne.oz.au>
>Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
>Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 10:35:02 +1000
>Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
>Sender:       NOVELERR@SUVM.SYR.EDU
>From:         Byron Newton <eq01893@QLD.TNE.OZ.AU>
>Subject:      Re: Odd problem with Win 3.1 & RPL
>Lines: 18

>In bit.listserv.novell you write:

>>Hello all, have a bizarre occurence. Using a Netware 3.11 environment and
>>486 workstations, I recently installed Windows 3.1 on a network drive and
>>had it working well under standalone conditions. When I recently set the
>>workstation up under remote boot (RPL), I get the message "Unable to find
>>path to EMM386, unable to continue" from windows. I can however, bring
>>Windows up if a floppy with EMM386.EXE on it is in the A drive. Note, the
>>win.com program looks in the A drive for the file before giving the message.

>>Karthik       (karthik@templevm)

>There is a command line switch wich you can give emm386.exe when loading to
> specify its location. the exact switch escapes me at the moment, but use the
> switch and set the path to where a emm386.exe lives normally your windows
> directory.

>Byron Newton

We had the same problem here. The switch is /Y=path to emm386.exe. I found
that this works only until version 4.4.4 of emm386. Later versions say
wrong qualifier or so.

Thomas Babsch, University of Ulm, Germany
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 14 Sep 1992 00:03:00 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "SHEL SAX (802)388-3711X5323" <SAX@MIDD.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: e-mail, cc:mail or Microsoft Mail

We use Microsoft Mail at our college and it works well on both PC's running
Windows and Macs.  A recent review in MacWorld (Cross Platform Operability
was the featured topic) gave the nod to cc:mail over Microsoft for multi
platform environments because, they reported, configuring the servers and
gateways on cc:mail was significantly easier than for Microsoft Mail.  The
trade off was that Microsoft Mail was significantly faster than cc:mail in
all timing tests.  Hope this helps.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 9 Sep 1992 18:26:59 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Gail CHernosky <NOVELL@UCONNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: LWP and TN3270
              9 Sep 1992 12:28:00 PDT from <IJR1EEC@MVS.OAC.UCLA .EDU>

Once I had a problem that was similar that occured using the Kedit editor
on the mainframe. The solution was a set statemnet .. set nulls off or set
nulls on, I can't remember which. Whatever your current setting is, try
reversing it. Sorry I can't remember any more clearly!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:49:52 -0500
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         ACS_NETWORK@JMUVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: ASN.1 language description

The ASN.1 spec is an OSI spec. I'm not sure where to get OSI
documents.  Its  listed as "Specification of Abstract Syntax
Notation One (ASN.1). 1987. International Standard 8824. There
is also an addendum: Draft Addendum 1:Extensions to ASN.1.
1987. Draft Addendum 8824/DAD 1. Marshall Rose gives a 10 page
description in "The Simple Book: An Introduction to Management
of TCP/IP based Internets". I believe Ulysess Black also describes
it in his network management book published by McGraw-Hill.

gary flynn
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: unrz39@epix.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (Martin Heyer)
Subject: Novell data encryption
Organization: Regionales Rechenzentrum Erlangen
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 06:47:31 GMT


I'm looking for a way to encrypt data on Novell networks (not just passwords).
Is anybody aware of a software solution ?

Any hints would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
        Martin Heyer

==============================================================================
        Martin Heyer
        Regional Computing Center Erlangen
        Friedrich-Alexander-Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg
        (heyer@daphne.rrze.uni-erlangen.de)
==============================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:      UK.AC.QUB.V2;  7 SEP 92 19:27:44 BST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 7 Sep 1992 19:27:00 GMT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         GRG1678@VAX2.QUEENS-BELFAST.AC.UK
Subject:      RE: ODI for BICC ISOLAN 4110 cards

To the best of my knowledge, BICC do *not* support ODI: this is because in the
past they offered their own `MPS', Multi-Protocol Support, facility with their
cards which did somewhat the same thing as ODI. This might now change as BICC
but you would need to check with your supplier. I fear it is more likely that
3Com will just drop the BICC card range to avoid it competing with their own,
which does of course provide ODI support with each card.

Tony Sheehan
grg1678@v2.qub.ac.uk

Queen's University, Belfast
Northern Ireland
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 17:57:08 -400
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Steven Ploof <Steve.Ploof@UTXVM.CC.UTEXAS.EDU>
Subject:      Autoexec.ncf and Multiple subnets

Folks,

  I need to add more subnets (using IPtunneling) to my server.  My current
setup reads:

  Name=ETHER_II
  Load TCPIP Forward=yes rip=no
  Bind IPX to ETHER_II
  Bind IP to ETHER_II ADDR=xxx.xx.206.xx MASK=255.255.255.0
Gate=xxx.xx.206.250
  ARP=YES
  Load IPTUNNEL NAME=IP_TUN
  Bind IPX to IP-TUN NET=8053CE0F

My Novell contact is on vacation.  How do I change this to add another net
(8053E500)?

Thanks
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Ploof     	       	       	       	   University of Texas
Computer Programmer/Services Assistant  	   PO Box P, PCL 1.102
Supervisor, PCL Microcomputer Center    	   Austin, Tx  78713

Internet: Steve.Ploof@utxvm.cc.utexas.edu   Voice (512) 495-4107
---My opinions are just that.---
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: novell@suvm.BITNET
X-VMS-To: NOVELL
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 9 Sep 1992 14:55:00 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Jane Hesler <HESLER@VCUVAX.BITNET>
Subject:      Loading ODI drivers at 0x63

I want to convert from the Clarkson Packet Drivers to the ODI drivers but
need to load the drivers at 0X63 so that I can load WINPKT.
I can include 0X63 as a parameter on the Clarkson Drivers but can
not figure out how to do it with the ODI dirvers.

Does anyone know a way to load at 0x60?  Do I need to change NET.CFG?
Is there another way to handle the WINPKT problem.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Posted-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 92 13:37 EST
Return-Path: hansen@luau.kean.edu
Organization: Kean College of New Jersey, Union NJ  07083
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 13:15:00 EST
Reply-To:     hansen@luau.kean.edu
From:         hansen@LUAU.KEAN.EDU
Subject:      Netware Lite /Token Ring problem

          I have recently attempted to install a Netware Lite
          (v1.0) network on a token ring hardware using IBM PC adapter
          cards.  I believe they are the original
          version of the PC adapter. (Breadboard style card with lots
          of solder and large heat sinks).

          I seem to be able to load the LSL.COM (v1.10) with out any
          error.  However, when I load the TOKEN.COM (v1.12) I get the
          error FATAL: LSL NOT LOADED.   Has anyone seen this problem
          before?

          I have a feeling that TOKEN.COM does not support this card.
          If this is the case, can anyone tell me the name of the ODI
          driver for this card and where I might find it?

          Any input on this matter is appreciated.

          Thanks in advance . . .
          Fred Hansen - Network Support         hansen@luau.kean.edu
          Kean College of NJ                    hhansen@pilot.njin.net

                " Still learnin' after all these years "
From: SZYMON@UCINVL.UCI.AGH.EDU.PL (Szymon Sokol)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: Re: TCP/IP-Gateway for Novell 3.11
Date: 11 Sep 92 11:20:57 GMT
Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R1).

> From:         SCHULZKI <MICHAEL.SCHULZKI@MASCHINENWESEN.FH-KIEL.DBP.DE>
> we are searching for a TCP/IP-Gateway solution for our Novell-LAN Netware
 3.11.
> We want to make FTP and TELNET connections to our UNIX-Machines.
>
> We prefer an NLM solution if possible.

Why NLM? If you only want to telnet and ftp from your Novell workstations
to a Unix host, all you need is a TCP/IP package for MS-DOS - CUTCP from
Clarkson University is a good (and free) one. We are using it for over one
year. If you can spare one station (XT will be enough), CUTCP can also run
as FTP server and provide FTP access to Netware mapped disks as well as to local
disks of that station.


                                   Szymon Sokol
                                   Network Manager

     U     U  M     M  M     M     Computer Center
     U     U  MM   MM  MM   MM     University of Mining and Metallurgy
     U     U  M M M M  M M M M     ave. Mickiewicza 30
     U     U  M  M  M  M  M  M     30-059 Krakow, POLAND
     U     U  M     M  M     M     TEL.    +48 12 338100 EXT. 2885
      UUUUU   M     M  M     M     TEL/FAX +48 12 338907
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: mailout v1.26 released
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Sat, 12 Sep 1992 01:50:00 PDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "John.Thomson" <John.Thomson@F901.N713.Z1.FIDONET.ORG>
Subject:      E-Mail software for LANs

Hi out there!

Wanting to install a combination E-Mail and Scheduler package for LAN at work,
which is running 20 DOS-based 386 clients from a Compaq 486 server.  Network
OS is DEC Pathworks 4.1, which is (supposedly) Lan Manager 2.0 compatible.

I am aware of a number of packages such as cc:Mail, WordPerfect Office, DaVinci
& Microsoft Mail, although haven't yet seen any in action.  The problem seems
to be getting scheduling capabilities in one package with normal E-Mail
functions.  (Question: is this what is termed groupware?)

Any info/experience/recommendations would be great help.  Main considerations
are:

1.  Will operate under Windows on clients
2.  Easy to learn and use (some clients not overly computer literate!)
3.  Would allow me to dial up from my home modem

Should I just get two separate packages (ie E-Mail, and Scheduler)?

Hope someone can help.

J.
---
--

John.Thomson
Internet: John.Thomson@f901.n713.z1.Fidonet.org
Compuserve: >internet:John.Thomson@f901.n713.z1.Fidonet.org
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: mailout v1.26 released
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 07:59:18 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "(David Deitch)" <deitch@GISATL.FIDONET.ORG>
Subject:      Recommendations Sought

For a WS backup system over the network.  Seeking to back up up to 10GB of data
 nightly over 10base-T.  Need software recommendations and suggestions for a
 large capacity tape drive or multi-tape changer.

          David Deitch, (GIS) Atlanta
--
----------------------------------------------------------
               __
              /  \             User: David Deitch
             /|oo \            Via FidoNet node: 1:133/411
            (_|  /_)
             _`@/_ \    _     FidoNet <==> UUCP Gateway
            |     | \   \\    FidoNet Net 133, Atl96
            | (*) |  \_  ))
  ______    |__U__| /  \//     David Deitch, Administrator
 / FIDO \    _//|| _\   /     Galaxy Information System
(________)  (_/(_|(____/ (jm)   (GIS) Atlanta

UUCP: gatech!warlord!gisatl!deitch
INTERNET: deitch@gisatl.fidonet.org
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Address:  Krakowskie Przedmiescie 26/28, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.
Organization: Dep. of Psychology  Warsaw  Poland
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R3).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 09:35:30 MTE-2
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Cezar Cichocki <CEZAR@PSYCH2.PSYCH.UW.EDU.PL>
Subject:      Re: WANTED: CNE Study materials

> Hello,
> I am interested in obtaining study aids for the following CNE exams:
>
> 1-NetWare 3.11 System Manager test #50-91
> 2-NetWare 3.11 Advanced System Manager test #50-82
> 3-NetWare Service and Support test #50-46
> 4-NetWorking Technologies test # 50-80
> 5-NetWare Dial-in, Dial-out Connnectivity test #50-112
> 6-NetWare for Macintosh Connectivity test #50-93
> 7-NetWare for NFS test # 50-87
> 8-NetWare TCP/IP Transport test # 50-86
> 9-NetWare 2.2 System Manager teat # 50-20
> 10-NetWare 2.2 Advanced System Manger test #50-44
> 11-LANalyser Basics test # 50-110

I saw one on SIMTEL, in PD1:<msdos.lan> directory. It was called CNE.ZIP or
somethink like this. It is veru usefull fuul sreen program.
I hope this help,


-------------------------------------------------------------------
| Cezar Cichocki                    | The best prevention against |
| Supervisor- network Administrator | viruses is not to buy PC !  |
| Dep. of Psychology                |-----------------------------|
| Warsaw Uniwersity  POLAND         | cezar@psych2.psych.uw.edu.pl|
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| also : cezar@plearn.BITNET, cezar@zorro.fuw.edu.pl              |
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1992 12:22:15 -0700
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "(Gretchen Louise Mullendore)" <gretchen@UGCS.CALTECH.EDU>
Subject:      Re: DougMenu...

In bit.listserv.novell you write:

>Hi, Everybody

>Would someone please tell me what are DougMenu?

DougMenu is a great menuing system that I, and many other Novell users, use
instead of the Novell Menu.  I just switched to DougMenu about two months ago
and everyone in the office loves it!  The users like it because it runs much
faster, and I _love_ it because it's not a memory hog like the Novell Menu,
plus the fact that DougMenu has many nice added features.
DougMenu can be downloaded from many ftp sites...  The address of some of
these sites is listed in this group, but if you can't get the address, just
email me back, and I will give you one... (if you haven't figured it out,
DougMenu is shareware)
Hope this helps!

Gretchen Mullendore
First Quadrant Corp
gretchen@to.ugcs.caltech.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Univ. of Southwestern La., Lafayette
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 11:00:17 -0500
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "(Karthikeyan Gurnswamy)" <jmfres11@UCS.USL.EDU>
Subject:      Re: IBM$RUN.OVL - wrong version???

In article <NOVELL%92090805102749@SUVM.SYR.EDU> you write:
>Shalom,
>
>I installed the ARC+ software on NW 3.11 and when i am runnig it i receive
>the error message:
>
>  "The overlay file IBM$RUN.OVL is the wrong version for this utility."
>
>Any answer will be appreciated.
>
>Nanu Calmanovitz
>Center of Technological Education
>Holon, ISRAEL

IBM$RUN.OVL is a file required by programs written with C-Worthy library.
Sure guess is ARC+ was written with C-Worthy - It is probably using the
IBM$RUN.OVL used by Netware utilities like SYSCON and FILER. You may have
to copy the IBM$RUN that comes with the software and put it in the current
directory or the ARC+ working directory. The problem you may get is ARC+
may work, but SYSCON may complain the stuff. So just have a batch file that
will setup ARC+ as the first search path with the correct IBM$RUN.OVL in
ARC+ directory and once you've used ARC+, delete the search path.

Hope that helps...

Karthik
/----------------------------------------\--------------------------\
| Karthikeyan Guruswamy                  | I survived hurricane     |
| Graduate Student, Computer Science     |                          |
| Center for Advanced Computer Studies   | ANDREW ...               |
| Univ. of SouthWestern Louisiana        |                          |
| Lafayette, LA 70501                    |                          |
| Email: jmfres11@ucs.usl.edu            |                          |
|                                        \--------------------------\
| The opinions stated are solely mine and does not reflect the views|
| of anyone in my organization ...                                  |
\-------------------------------------------------------------------/
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: THOMASG@epx.cis.umn.edu (ThomasD.Gasser)
Subject: Re: McAfee's NLM
Organization: Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:02:36 GMT

McAfee also has their own FTP site now.  It is MCAFEE.COM  
The latest scan and NLM should always be there.  The latest version of the 
NLM is 1.03 if you are using 1.00 you should upgrade.


In article <MAILQUEUE-101.920911165538.416@medicine.newcastle.edu.au> John Hendriks <JDH@MEDICINE.NEWCASTLE.EDU.AU> writes:
>Date:         Fri, 11 Sep 1992 16:55:38 GMT+1000
>From:         John Hendriks <JDH@MEDICINE.NEWCASTLE.EDU.AU>
>Subject:      McAfee's NLM
>Hi,
>    The McAfee NLM is now on FTP.NEWCASTLE.EDU.AU under pub/PC/virus
>and is called NETSHLD.ZIP


*********************************************************************
*  Thomas D. Gasser                                                 *
*  Department of Neurosurgery                *******     ******     *
*  University of Minnesota                    ***  *** *** ***      *
*  (612) 624-4427                             ***   *****  ***      *
*  E-Mail:  THOMASG@EPX.CIS.UMN.EDU          *****        *****     *
*                                                                   *
*********************************************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:50:16 PDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "(Richard Warner)" <rick@SJSUMCS.SJSU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Netshld.nlm
              "NOVELERR@suvm.acs.syr.EDU" at Sep 11, 92 4:22 pm

> >> Our nameserver can't seem to locate MCAFFEE.COM; does anyone have the IP
> >> number for their system for FTP purposes?
> >>
> >> Brucea@ucrac1.ucr.edu
> >
> >MacAffee is NOT on Internet.  They go through a commercial service
> >for news and mail.  Try SIMTEL, wuarchive.wustl.edu, or the
> >oakland.risc.ua.edu for MacAffee's stuff.
> >
> >The only type of access MacAffee supports is through their internal
> >BBS or CompuServe (MACAFFEE forum).
> >
> >+-----------------------+-------------------------------------+
> >|   Richard M. Warner   |   Internet:  rick@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu  |
> >|                       | CompuServe:  71121,2257             |
> >+-----------------------+-------------------------------------+
>
> McAfee most definitely IS on the internet AND provides anonymous ftp!
>
> I just transfered the latest versions of the files from the directory
> pub/antivirus.
>
> The site is mcafee.com
> (Please note the correct spelling of mcafee - M C one A one F two Es )
>
> Daniel Holtzman
> Transplantation Institute
> University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
> dth@txs.pitt.edu
>

Oops - sorry.  They were NOT connected last I checked.  I saw an
announcement of their physical move a little while back (cross town),
but I missed their announcement of added connectivity to the world.
Sorry - thanks for correcting me.

+-----------------------+-------------------------------------+
|   Richard M. Warner   |   Internet:  rick@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu  |
|                       | CompuServe:  71121,2257             |
+-----------------------+-------------------------------------+
|  ** DISCLAIMER:  All opinions are strictly my own.  I work  |
|                  hard enough at forming them!               |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell