HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cap@mb5000.anes.upmc.edu (chris pilewski)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: Should I leave it on?
Date: 16 Dec 92 16:48:29 GMT
Organization: UPMC

Hi,

In article <1992Dec16.012359.8221@sarah.albany.edu>, cs5059@albnyvms.bitnet writes:       			
|> My friend told me that I should leave the computer running
|> instead of turning it on each time I want to use it.  This is 
|> probably between 1 to 10 times a day.  I've been leaving it on
|> from the first time I turn  it on in the day, until I finsih
|> using it before I go to bed.  This means it is on everyday from
|> morning/early afternoon to late at night.  I know what you are thinking,
|> I do shut the monitor, I guess I should have said that first.
|>                      
|> He told me the reason is to save wear and tear on the computer,
|> and hard drive.  

Your friend is correct.  Most "wear and tear" on a fixed disk occurs
during power-up.
  
|> Also, does leaving on the cpu use much energy.

It uses a fair amount.  Look up the wattage of your power supply.  It will
probably be around 200 watts (similar to leaving on 2 lamps, but nothing
like an oven or clothes dryer).
 
|> Should I quit win3.1 when
|> I leave the comp. on for a while (I can't see why, but thought I'd ask
|> to be safe)?

This is not necessary.  Just running Windows (without any programs running)
does not increase the system load.


Some large scale studies have been done on this general issue.  They compared
leaving the computer on (cpu and power supply wear, energy consumption ...)
vs. shutting the computer off after every use (wear on the disk, etc.).
The conclustion that they all came to was that: leaving the computer on is
actually the best course of action.  Although, the actual cost/year difference
was very small.

For me, the bottom-line is the disk.  I back-up weekly.  But, even over that
time period, the files that I have on my disk may be of much greater value
than the whole PC itself.

						- back to the show...

  \\/////// ---------------------------------------------------------------
  |  " "  |	Christopher Pilewski
  |  > O  |	pil@med.pitt.edu		
  |   L   |	cap@mb5000.anes.upmc.edu
  | \___/ |	(412) 648-8157
  \_______/ ---------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: spcberto@psyche.spc.uchicago.edu (Robert Osterlund)
Subject: Re: norton desktop for windows/ stacker
Organization: University of Chicago, SSPPCC
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:55:25 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.073125.7943@sarah.albany.edu> cs5059@albnyvms.bitnet writes:
>Hello friends,
>my question as the subject says deals with Norton Desktop
>and Stacker 2.0.  A friend told me to make sure that Norton
>Desktop for 
>Windows may have a problem with its anti-virus program 
>and my Stacker 2.0.  Is this true and is there a way to 
>avoid it if so.
>

I had sharing violations when running the Norton AntiVirus for Windows
(included in the Desktop package) until I REMed out the CONFIG.SYS line

DEVICE=C:\NDW\NAV&.SYS /B

which activates the real-time virus intercept.  I had this problem on
systems regardless of whether I was running Stacker.  With that device
driver inactivated, I have had no problems running Stacker and Norton
AntiVirus whatsoever.  (I run the virus checks automatically in the wee
morning hours via Wcron.)

Bob Osterlund
berto@clio.spc.uchicago.edu
SSPPCC--University of Chicago

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: mheniff@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (mike)
Subject: GIF viewer
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 19:42:05 GMT


OK.  Since I've been looking around for GIF/BMP programs recently I've 
decided to post what I've found (and compare them).

GIF viewers can be found at:
ftp.cica  at /pub/pc/win3/desktop   and
garbo  at win3/gifutil

DOS GIF viewers
CSHOW  the most common.  I'm not sure where to download it from but its ok.
Its speed is good but it only opens GIF files.
GWS  also good.  I'm not sure where to get this either.  It is slower than
cshow but can open almost everything (GIF, BMP, PCX, etc) and can convert
between them.  Recommended for DOS transforming.
GIFV37.ZIP from garbo.  Definately NAG-WARE.  Opens GIF (maybe BMP) but
doesn't convert anything.  

I'd recommend CSHOW for viewing and GWS for transforming.

WINDOWS GIF viewers
IMAGE.ZIP from cica.  Terrible.  No conversion, no color, no dice.
CVIEW386.ZIP from cica.  Good quality.  Takes up a lot of memory though.
Only opens GIF and BMP (and IMG I think).  Good at manipulating brightness
contrast, gamma, etc but check out PSP.
PSP10.ZIP  from cica.  Paint Shop Pro.  Great.  Definately get.  Great
quality, conversion from about everything to everything.  Reads GIF, BMP and
about ten other formats.  The best but is a little slower the CSHOW for DOS.
WINGIF>ZIP from cica.  Good.  About as fast a PSP10 but doesn't convert.
Opens both GIF and BMP.
GWSWIN10.ZIP from cica.  GWS for DOS windows counterpart.  I haven't tried
this personally but I hear it's similar to the DOS version.  Slow too.

.

I'd recommend Paint Shop Pro to do everything and then some.

If you have any further questions email me.
Mike
mheniff@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
.
From: lance@lancea.actrix.gen.nz (Lance Andrewes)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 vs DOS
Distribution: world
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 20:43:00 GMT
Organization: none
Keywords: OS/2

In article <1g8a21INN9gv@male.EBay.Sun.COM> dba@most.EBay.Sun.COM writes:
>I have just entered the pc world for the first time.
>Bought a 486/33 with 4RAM plus 200MB hard disk.
>The purpose of my machine will be to run children's
>software plus a C compiler for Dad.  I have an unopened
>OS/2 2.0 package.  Is there a good reason that I should
>opt for the standard DOS 5.0 with Windows 3.1 on top [etc]?

Firstly my "credentials" for offering advice: I've been running
OS/2 2.0 since the second-to-last beta version.  At home I have
a 20MHz 386SX with 8MB RAM, 200MB drive.  I use a good mix
of DOS, Windows and OS/2 apps.  At work I'm developing software
on PCs running DOS 5.0+Windows 3.1.


With the addition of 4MB RAM, your machine will be well suited
to running OS/2.  Sure, it'll run with 4MB total, but 8MB is
necessary for it to run well.

Compatability with DOS programs is very good indeed.  Windows
3.1 capability is expected early '93. 

At present OS/2 is pretty stable, but the recent bug-fix
(known as the "CSD") has introduced a few new problems
along with the fixes!  My system was crashing daily for a few
weeks, but I moved things around on the disk last week.  It
hasn't crashed since.  Why?  Don't know.  It would be fair
to say I regard OS/2 as a little bit flakey.  But so is
Windows!  It crashes, and DOS apps lock-up.  The reboot under DOS
is a lot quicker so they are not quite as annoying.  Under OS/2
you have a definite advantage in that you can often kill
an app that has itself crashed, without killing OS/2.

Okay.  Constructive advice time: -

1. If you will be running Windows apps much, or need TrueType
fonts and Multimedia support, install DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.1.
Windows will really fly on your system in the 4MB you have.
When OS/2 supports Win3.1, upgrade to that.

2. If DOS apps will be your mainstay, install OS/2 as your main
operating system.  Put it in its own partition (around 40MB
should be plenty - provided you put the swapfile on a different
partition).  If you want to be able to boot either DOS or
OS/2, that must be a FAT partition.  The OS/2 manuals (brief
though they are) explain the setup well.  You can play with
OS/2 apps, and hopefully can move more and more in that direction.
I have three HPFS partitions, and a FAT partition.  To boot DOS
I simply boot off a floppy.  The FAT partition is the only one
visible to me then, and appears as the C: drive.

Good luck!
__
 _______  Email: lance@lancea.actrix.gen.nz
////      ZL2AJH    Wellington, New Zealand

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: smadja@cs.columbia.edu (Frank Smadja)
Subject: latex for windows
Organization: Columbia University Department of Computer Science
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 15:45:56 GMT


Hi there:

I am looking for LATEX for windows if it exists, any hint? I looked at
garbo and cica without success.  


Thanks

Frank.
Xref: sparky comp.os.ms-windows.misc:5590 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:33584
From: phil@faatcrl (Phil Willows)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Color printing options for our group
Date: 17 Dec 1992 23:59:42 GMT
Organization: FAA Technical Center, Pomona, NJ	
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: offserv2.faa.gov
Keywords: HP deskjet ms-windows

I own the HP500C deskjet.  It's a fine printer and you might be happy
with the current pricing structure.  If a couple of hundred dollars
is not an issue, I would purchase the HP550C instead (not available
when I purchased the HP500C).  The HP550C uses a dual cartridge 
printhead (one color, one b/w).  This allows true black lines/images
instead of the off-green appearance given be the HP500C.

Also, be advised, the HP500C/HP550C printers are designed for PCs and
compatibles.  The DeskWriter is for Apple/MAC interfaces.

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.os.ms-dos.misc
From: kushmer@bnlux1.bnl.gov (christopher kushmerick)
Subject: Survey: Intermittent failures on 486-DX-33+ machines
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 00:09:44 GMT

I have a 6 month old 486-DX-33 machine. I have used it a lot and so
it is safe to assume that it is "burned" in. But:

When it is on for a few hours, things (see below) go wrong that only 
seem to be fixable by turning off the computer for a while.

I am interested in how many owners of 486 machines have intermittent 
problems. Here are a few of what I get after the computer has been on
for a few hours


1) When I run word perfect, I get the message "packed file corrupt".
I am running from DOS, and I believe that this is a dos message.


2) windows progman gives access violations (or what ever they call it)
as reported by "application failure" report. This occurs during windows 
startup and I usually can not start windows

3) In the same time frame as 2), when I start window, the screen goes blank
and the computer hangs.

I try reset the computer, even power down/up but it does not help. the
only thing that helps is turning the power off for a few hours.


I long ago disabled smart drive, thinking that this may be the problem. 
It did not help.

Disk doctor reports nothing unusual (well actually there were a few lost chains
I don't know if this means I should reformat the disk and reload everything
or not... Any suggestions here).

SO please send me mail if you have intermittent problems on you new 486, or
if you did and figured out how to fix them. I'll summarize replies.

One obvious idea is insufficient ventilation. However this occurs as frequently
when the house is 65 F. as when it is 75F. degrees. the air coming out
of the (large tower) case is always cool to the touch, although I never
measured it. Perhaps the air is not circulating properly though the 
boards. I may try to put in a larger fan this week...


Please do reply (mail or post) if you have any ideas .

thanks,




-- 
Chris Kushmerick
kushmer@bnlux1.bnl.gov
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: scott@unixland.natick.ma.us (Scott Evernden)
Subject: Re: PowerPoint's Big Secret
Keywords: PowerPoint
Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix & Think_Tank BBS
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 18:14:42 GMT

In article <1674@applix.com> jimr@applix.com (Jim Rouleau [ext 256]) writes:
>
>   To my surprise, however, the Customer Support person and
>then the liaison person said that the PowerPoint format is
>"secret"  and that there was no way I was going to get it!
>
>   I guess Microsoft is back in the business of only wanting
>to talk to other Microsoft apps and of keeping the industry
>'in the dark' ages.

Same deal for the file format for WINHELP .hlp files (the binary
format, not the source .rtf format).  Obviously, Microsoft doesn't
want _anybody_ developing compatible apps in the domains of HELP or
Multimedia Viewers...

-scott
----
GrayMatter Software Co.              Holliston, MA   508 429-7867
scott@unixland.natick.ma.us    scott@opl.com    spe@world.std.com
user interface and application development technologies and tools
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: a722756@roper.mc.ti.com (W. Donald Rolph)
Subject: Re: DEC's SETHOST and Win3.1
Originator: a722756@roper.mc.ti.com
Keywords: SETHOST, DEC
Organization: Texas Instruments / Attleboro Mass / USA
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:40:35 GMT


Weare doing this in production usage just fine.  We typically run sethost as a
dos window under windows 3.1 so we get the full windows capabilities (set your
pif file etc.)  NOte we are using sethost and pathworks over the tcp/ip stack.
-- 

Regards.
 
Don Rolph  a722756@pan.mc.ti.com WD3 MS10-13 (508)-699-1263
Xref: sparky comp.os.ms-windows.misc:5602 comp.unix.misc:4619 comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32:2535
From: watz@dk-vs.UUCP (Uwe Watzek)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.unix.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.win32
Subject: Windows/NT - Sources for benchmark searched
Date: 18 Dec 92 14:16:29 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Organization: Digital-Kienzle Computersyst.  7730 Villingen/Germany

Hi folks ,
i'am searching benchmark source codes for Windows or Windows NT.
If you have an advice, where i can find such sources please mail me.
My Email address is wollo@kivax.UUCP or wollo@dk-vs.DE
Thanks in advance

^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-

Joerg Wollenweber     Tel.:  +49 7721 862088  Fax: +497721/2113
Digital Kienzle       Teletex: 772118-27
Abt. 012.3            e-mail: wollo@kivax.UUCP oder wollo@dk-vs.DE
Postfach 1660         ..!mcsun!unido!kivax!wollo
D-7730 VS-Villingen   ..!uunet!unido!kivax!wollo

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: schuck@fraser.sfu.ca (Bruce Jonathan Schuck)
Subject: Re: NDW -- is there a way to run it from a network drive???
Reply-To: Bruce_Schuck@sfu.ca
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 02:06:49 GMT

gibsonst@sonoma.edu (Stephen Gibson) writes:


>In article <schuck.724133145@sfu.ca> schuck@fraser.sfu.ca (Bruce Jonathan Schuck) writes:
>>Is there a way to run NDW from a network drive and only have a few
>>essential files on my C: drive?
>>
>>Windows allows it with  setup /n
>>
>>Word for Windows has a workstation option where it only copies *one*
>>file or creates *one* on my C: drive.
>>
>>How about NDW?
>>
>>If it doesn't, I may have to go back to Windows 3.1 -- arggghhh!
>>

>NDW 2.0 has a network installation option.  Check your documentation for 
>more info.


Not in the version of 2.0 I have.

However, I have been informed there is another version of 2.0 that has
network installation options which I have not checked out yet.
From: egotrip@yaya.WPI.EDU (Jon Charette)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Attaching an Apple Printer to IBM w/ windows
Date: 18 Dec 1992 22:35:49 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: yaya.wpi.edu

	Does anyone know how to attach an Apple Imagewriter II to an IBM
clone?  Windows print manager has drivers for the printer but I do not know
how to attach the printer to my computer.  I have both a serial and parallel
port available on my computer if that helps at all.

	Please either respond by posting to this group or , preferabally,
by e-mail.

				Thank you,
					
					Jon
					egotrip@wpi.wpi.edu

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: shopsis@panther.adelphi.edu (Charles Shopsis)
Subject: Re: stacker 2.0 vs 3.0
Organization: Adelphi University - Node: Boole
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 21:00:42 GMT

In article <oneil.724031791@cwis> oneil@cwis.unomaha.edu (Sharon O'Neil) writes:

>cs5059@albnyvms.bitnet writes:

>>I am currently a happy stacker 2.0 user.
>>I was wondering what I get by upgrading to 3.0.
>>What is the difference/features/speed/etc.?????
>>Thanks !

>Being able to stack floppies and use them on other pc's -- even if they
>don't have stacker.  I believe you can also stack bernoulli and tape as
>well.

>Very nice gauge in Windows showing level of fragmentation, etc.

>Sharon
>oneil@cwis.unomaha.edu

Also, a small improvement is stacking efficiency.  A 65 Mb drive that I had 
stacked with 2.0 gave me about 5 Mb more with stacker 3, but, stacker 3 
takes up 2 more Mb of HD space than stacker 2.0.  They claim that optimize 
works twice as fast, but half of forever is still a pretty long time.  
Stacker 3.0 also gives you some control of compression vs. speed, but 
there is no quantification of this trade off, thus its usefulness is 
difficult to evaluate.  The manual for 3 is quite a bit better; 
in particular; they now tell you what to do when stacker encounters a bad 
file and write protects your hard drive (a very disconcerting expereince).

Charles Shopsis
shopsis@panther.adelphi.edu 


THe windows gauges are not (IMHO) worth the upgrade.
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: tmc@spartan.ac.BrockU.CA (Tim Ciceran)
Subject: Icon Storage Format
Organization: Brock University, St. Catharines Ontario
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 21:35:48 GMT

Please forgive me if this is a FAQ, but I'm interested in finding
out how Windows .ico files are formatted. If anyone could relay this
information or suggest a reference, I would appreciate it.

Thanks in advance,

TMC
From: prang@du9ds4.fb9dv.uni-duisburg.de (Juergen Prang)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: VBRUN200.DLL (for VB 2.0 apps) - WHERE??
Date: 13 Dec 92 20:31:23 GMT
Organization: Universitaet Duisburg GH
Distribution: comp
NNTP-Posting-Host: du9ds4.fb9dv.uni-duisburg.de

walver@kielo.uta.fi (Ville V. Walveranta) writes:


>        I just received a VisualBASIC application that has been compiled
>        using VisualBASIC 2.0. According to the documentation I have to
>        have VBRUN200.DLL in my \windows -directory in order to run the
>        program.

>        I roamed through all ftp-sites I know with no success. Not in
>        cica, not in wuarchive Simtel20-mirrors, not in garbo, not in
>        nic.funet.fi, not anywhere!! I checked all the files that
>        started with vb*.* - no luck!

>        Please let me know where I could find this file. Preferrably via
>        ftp. Thanks!

Try 
ftp.uni-duisburg.de: /pub/pc/win3/util/vbrun200.zip
login anonymous, password FULL e-mail address.

Hope this helps
-- 
   Juergen Prang           | INTERNET: prang@du9ds4.fb9dv.uni-duisburg.de
   University of Duisburg  | BITNET: prang%du9ds4.fb9dv.uni-duisburg.de@UNIDO
   EE - Dept. of Dataprocessing - Bismarckstr. 81 - D-4100 Duisburg 1
From: ls8139@albnyvms.bitnet (Larry Silverberg  Future DPM)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: icons, icons, icons
Date: 18 Dec 92 18:50:26 GMT
Reply-To: ls8139@albnyvms.bitnet
Organization: University of NY at Albany

Hello again,

Is there a program to display/print icons.
Does win3.1 do this for you and I don't know how.
I assume there is a way of doing this becuase when
browsing moreicons.dll (or something like that) it
lets you display them.  When I want to look at other
icons I have to select one at a time, then go back to browse...

How about a program for printing?
pd or shareware?

Also is there a file of icons at some ftp?
Where?
thanks Larry

P.S. I am very excited, and I would like to anounce my acceptance
     for Fall '93 into Podiatric Medical College!
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: (Tim Keitt)
Subject: re: Suppressing the Ctrl-D prepend on Postscript files
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 20:05:06 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque NM
Reply-To: tkeitt@algodones.unm.edu

In article <1992Dec16.221239.29946@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> rww@mugwump.cl.msu.edu (Richard W. Wiggins) writes:
>Several folks gave advice on suppressing the damnable desire of
>Windows to prepend a Ctrl-D to Postscript print files.  The advice was
>to add to WIN.INI:	
>
>[PostScript,LPT2]
>ATM=placeholder
>ctrld=0
>
>[PostScript,COM1]
>ATM=placeholder
>ctrld=0
>
>...and to add the 'ctrld=' wherever a printer or port was defined.
>I did so, and the problem persists.  In my case, I'm printing to 
>a file, not to a printer port.  So I added the assignment statement
>anywhere that seemed remotely resident.  Still Windows slavishly adds
>the Ctrl-D.  (And yes I did reboot...)
>
>Any other suggestions?  Is it possible this doesn't work for prints to
>user-specified file names?  Is it too much to ask for Microsoft to 
>document this, or better yet provide a visible switch to turn it off?
>
>/Rich Wiggins, Michigan State U

Try CtrlD=0, not ctrld=0. I think the *.ini files are case 
sensetive (somebody post a correction if I'm wrong!). Why do 
you have PostScript connected to LPT2 and COM1 if your printing 
to a user specified file? My win.ini reads [Postscript,FILE].

Your right that this 'feature' is poorly documented and 
implemented. But then windows boxes connected to UNIX servers 
don't seem to be MS's priority (witness WfWG). Too much public 
domain thinking (you know, subversive open standards kind of 
stuff) in 'those'(UNIX) circles is my guess.

--
Timothy Keitt
tkeitt@algodones.unm.edu



Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: jonm@Ingres.COM (Don't Judge a book by your cover)
Subject: Re: Windows 3.0 --> 3.1
Summary: 
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords: 
Organization: University of Arizona MIS Department - Mosaic Group
Date: 15 Dec 92 11:20:59 GMT

In article <168BE933C.WKWINKEL@ibm.rz.uni-passau.de>, WKWINKEL@ibm.rz.uni-passau.de writes...
>In article <1992Dec14.230233.19525@sarah.albany.edu>
>cs5059@albnyvms.bitnet writes:
> 
>>
>>I have many shareware programs on my CD-ROM that when run
>>give me the error "made for previous windows version, may cause
>>unexpected results........"
>>Is there a way of converting these prgrms to be used w/ 3.1?
>>Or a way around to protect against these unexpected results.
>>Thanks I.A.
>>Larry
>Larry,
>are you sure those are programs written for 3.0 and not 2.x ?
>Regards,

You might also like to try running the executables through the resource
compiler.  This is the same sort of message I got while writing some
SDK stuff.

+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Jon Machtynger (jonm@ingres.com)                                           |
|Ingres Technology Centre. Wharfedale Rd,                                   |
|Winnersh, Wokingham. Berks UK.   (0734)-496525                             |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ahhh Brisbane, people actually get paid to work there... in the sun with  |
| all that fresh air and cheap petrol.... Or so ledgend has it              |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: Vassilo.Walluschnig@f55.n7101.z5.fidonet.org (Vassilo Walluschnig)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Windows NT
Date: 20 Dec 92 03:51:11 GMT
Organization: FidoNet node 5:7101/55 - LeClub, Mid Rand

Hi All,

  Okay, I got a question for all those people "in the know" about
  Windows NT. What would happen while running NT on a RISC machine, say
  the DEC Alpha, and running a DOS application in NT, and that DOS
  application makes a direct call to the video card? How would NT go
  about handling such a situation? Would it hang the application
  or would NT come back saying that it cannot run the program and
  promptly shuts the application down?

  Surely the video card on the RISC machine is not the same as those
  on the Intel machines? Or have I missed something?

  Thanks in advance for any replies to these questions.

Vassilo Walluschnig.

 * KMail 2.90  

--  
INTERNET: Vassilo.Walluschnig@f55.n7101.z5.fidonet.org
via:  THE CATALYST BBS in Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
       (catpe.alt.za)   +27-41-34-1122 HST or +27-41-34-2859, V32bis & HST.
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc