HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Why Phantom
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 15:41:34 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.014912.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>In article <kmr4.168.721514841@po.CWRU.edu>, kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M Ryan) writes:
>> 	When the President shows evidence of his lack of knowledge about the 
>> Constitution, it is disgraceful for all Americans. Native born humans, who 
>> happen to be athiest, and who have not been convicted of certain crimes, are 
>> considered to be citizens of the United States. Their individual religious 
>> views, or their lack of religious views has no effect upon their citizenship.
>
>Oh I see. You're the type that thinks because they read parts of the
>Consitiution, they understand it all. Well Mr. Dickless, sorry Mr. Dick (M)
>Less, if you had the slightest clue about the workings of government, you would
>know that the president does not interpret the Constitution, nor does he need
>to understand it. Thats what the Supreme Court is for. Gee, that's kinda
>logical isn't it! The president need only DEFEND the Constitution. I guess
>that's why in the oath, he says "preserve, protect, and defend the
>Constitution..." Nowhere is there mention of "intrepret" or "understand". It's
>strange how you accuse President Bush of not knowing the Constitution, when you
>have yet to take your first freshman class in government.
>
>--The Phantom

that has got to be the LAMEST defense of george bush i have ever heard.
the constitution doesnt say bush has to understand it, so its ok to have
someone defending and preserving the constitution without understanding it?
i guess next time you'll say the president does need to understand the 
laws congress passes, he just has to enforce them. fuck your semantic 
games, asshole; I personally think people who sign their usenet posts
with cutsy nicknames should not be considered citizens, but rather sold
to Arab countries as slaves in return for oil.

-Rob


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu
Subject: samant says
Organization: Bowling Green State University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 13:37:19 GMT

samant says:

>Listen, being a new name and all your letter gets at least looked at,
>and what does one find but another goddamned contribution to the ken
>atrocity.

  As long as I continue to see the name of K e n blasphemed, I will
  defend K e n.  I am serious about this.  Bitch.

>Is the irony too subtle for your brain?

  Bah!

  OK, bitch.  Here's the situation:  It's a shame that someone not a regular
poster has to spell it out for you, but you're crusty.  Your posts remain
nothing more than masturbatory displays of your 'vocabulary.'  And when you
control yourself and keep out the sickening exhibitions of your prowess with
a thesaurus, the only things you have to present are 'subtly ironic' one-liners
like "*You* go crawl under a petrified substance, motherfucker."

  OK, OK, you can't be blamed for your shit-headed mistakes -- you haven't
been making them for that long.  Not as long as "The Phantom."  The Phantom
has been boring us with clever synonyms since it got a thesaurus.  Well, listen
here phantom:

GO TO HELL PIECE OF SHIT SUCK ASS BITCH MOTHERFUCKER THAT FUCKS COWS AND GETS
ALL ORGASMIC OVER MENTALLY HANDICAPPED BITCHES COZ IT'S THE ONLY THING THAT
WILL FUCK YOU THAT IS REMOTELY HUMAN.

--Leah
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: test
Date: 6 Nov 1992 17:37:16 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

Just another test.

Bye.

==NAMENAMENAME==

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: University of Northern Indiana
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:26:50 GMT

In article <1992Nov12.025938.11604@muddcs.claremont.edu>, weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
>In article <kmr4.172.721533993@po.CWRU.edu> kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan) writes:
>> I like fat-butt women.
>
>	A statement was made. I claimed said statement was false. Supposed 
>'proof' was then posted. I pointed out that said proof failed to support the
>statement. Then  Mr. Anal 'I'm so superior' Retentive pops in with an
>irrelevant post with the apparent belief that it has something to do with
>correctness of the original statement. I point out that it is irrelevant.
>Mr. Anal 'I'm so superior' then cannot even answer my points but just has
>to tell everybody how superior he is.
>
>	I personally don't remember any argument over the definition of a
>word. It was simply over whether a statement was uttered. I think we can
>all now come to the conclusion that said statement was not uttered and that
>I am right and that everybody who argued against me is hopelessly wrong.
>
Ah, I see you have graduated from the Kevin Darcy school of debate.
You're position is a bit too easily defended this time, next time
redefine some words and add a fews quotes from month old articles.

>William Everett
>

Melvin M. Gladstone 
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Why Bush? (was: Why Clinton)
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 10:22:30 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.044605.9897@umr.edu>, ckincy@mcs213c.cs.umr.edu (Charles Kincy) writes:
> I do not know why I must dignify this abomination with a response.
> But, for some reason, I am compelled.

What the fuck is this, a Ross Perot flame??? "I am compelled to flame this guy
bcause, you youngins' out there, I'm doin' this for you... because I love you
folks." 
 
> Idiot, a president that suggests that people should be denied
> citizenship based upon the fact that they do not believe in God
> is sanctioning an official religion (theism), and he is thereby violating
> the First Amendment.  This would suggest that he is neither preserving,
> protecting, *nor* defending the Constitution.

Alas my child, you have missed the entire point... (sigh) the point of this
thread was that Bush DID NOT say this. And if you want to argue original
intent, be my guest. I will happily point out to you how very little you know.
But please stick to one point at a time, it will make your whole argument a LOT
more coherent.

> [Basless blather deleted]

Well (up) Chuck, you managed to show us all how intelligent you really are.
Gee, that innuendo... you know, the one with the corncob and the brain... Gawd!
You really have a command of the English Language!!! Where did you learn such
stunning sarcasism? Where did you acquie such a analytical mind? Please UpChuck
shows how all this happened.

--The Phantom
From: hartman_d@ab.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Thorn in my side
Date: 12 Nov 92 21:07:17 GMT
Organization: Alderson-Broaddus College

I finally have had enough! Now, I'm bringing this to the world! I attend a
rather small school, and within my program is a student named D. Jones. Mr.
Jones is 40, lost in his second or third childhood, (or maybe he never grew
up!), acts like a 12 year old, and never shuts his mouth. The worst thing is
that Mr. Jones talks alot, never says anything worthwhile and is basically a
SH-THEAD! There are 48 other students in our program, and if Mr. Jones is
lucky, maybe one person actually can stand him.

Thank you for letting me vent my anger on this quite useful board!

Dave
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: THE ULTIMATE FLAME OF FLAMES
Date: 5 Nov 92 15:55:31 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1992Nov4.233342.20682@latcs1.lat.oz.au> ooi@latcs5.lat.oz.au (Jeffrey K Ooi) writes:
>From: ooi@latcs5.lat.oz.au (Jeffrey K Ooi)
>Subject: THE ULTIMATE FLAME OF FLAMES
>Date: 4 Nov 92 23:33:42 GMT

>Since this is the flame newsgroup...


>I HATE EVERYBODY YOU ARE ALL FACISTS AND BIGOTS AND LESBIANS AND GAYS
>AND JEHOVAS WITNESSES AND SUDDAM LOVERS

>let the flames begin...

Sorry, this is too easy.


>-- 
>  Jeffrey (George bush) Ooi |   Ghostrider, you're instructed to land...    
            ^^^^^^^^^^^

Surely someone could flame him on this.

>  La Trobe University       |   Land Immediately!  What're you doin' Mav?
>  Australia                 |   We ain't got no fuel for this...

				 Talk to me, Goose.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Looking for a new sig...

  - Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
    exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org  <SLOW!>
From: tilden@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: K E N Poll-Genius or Jackass?
Date: 10 Nov 1992 13:53:21 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: discovery.ksu.ksu.edu


Ladies and Gentlemen of the Internet,

	I, Tilden-Master of Illogic, Ask for your participation in my survey.
I ask unto you, What is your of Kenneth J. Robinson? Is he the prophet he
proclaims himself to be, or is he a scum sucking dipshit who should shut the 
fuck up?  I shall let you decide.  Post your response here and I shall tally
the vote.

	I thank you for your time.

	Tilden-Master of Illogic
From: krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Kens stupid posts
Keywords: Ken,idiot
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:49:11 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1dmcveINNh2j@goldwing.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@goldwing.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>
>In article <BxB6IH.EoH@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov5.183513.21482@oswego.Oswego.EDU> iacs2210@oswego.Oswego.EDU (Bob Ternosky) writes:
>>>In article <Bx5vCr.1G6@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>>personally, 'I' think that this isn't the real ken.  he's been
>>>>>overtaken by aliens.  somebody shoot him
>>>>
>>>>K e n is K e n and K e n cannot be anything other than K e n.
>>>>
>>>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>>>Fellow flamers lets look at this wonderful piece of drivel from ken.
>>>Me is me and I cannot be anything other than me.
>>>Sounds a little redundant to me (sorry about that 3 syllable word ken)
>>>Ken you need to go to the library or a book store and look for a nice dictionarybefore you post again. Most of the people in this group are high school grads.
>>>so this wonderful piece of drivel you put up is kind of nauseating.
>>
>>K e n is not redundant. K e n has to provide details in the simplest terms
>>so that K e n does not confuse the stupid misinformed individuals on this
>>newsgroup. K e n does not require a dictionary. K e n also highly doubts
>>that many of these individuals are high school graduates, for they
>>ar incapable of certain procedures that should have been developed at
>>high school.
>>
>>>IMHO, ken was not overtaken by aliens, I think he had a sex change operation
>>>and Robs dog doesn't like him anymore.
>>
>>K e n has not had a sex change operation, for K e n does not require it.
>>Mr. Dobson's dog is irrelevant and not part of this discusssion.
>
>I think I get it!!!  K e n has no need for a sex operation for K e n has no sex!!!

You are making unwarranted extrapolations. You have no basis for 
determining on what K e n does and what K e n can do. K e n suggests
that you close your largest facial orifice.

>K e n is a Mother-fucking, dick sucking, two celled fucking ameoba!!!!

You seem to be quite confused, for K e n has stated over and over
that K e n is K e n. Perhaps you should try rereading my posts from
the past two months. Perhaps then you will know exactly what K e n is.
And further, please refrain from such crude language, for it gives
people the impression that you lack intelligence and have no manners.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: hines@socrates.ucsf.edu (Wade Hines)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:58:26 GMT
Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab

sche7135@mach1.wlu.ca (Scott Schelter u) writes:


>	FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>     That's right folks! I'm looking for the most graphic, verbose
>flames and insults you can muster. Gimme' something really juicy.

Bush supporting, Quayle loving, Pat Robertson sympathizing, David Duke 
empathizing, Moral Majority belonging, Phillis Schafley fornicating
napalm sniffing, pedophillic, watcher of daytime soaps.  May you meet
and naked mud wrestle Jessy Helms.

-Wade
"It just doesn't matter" B. Murry
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!DIR/ALL
From: crwilson@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu
Date: 11 Nov 92 10:17:14 -0500
Organization: Miami University Academic Computer Service"

In article <BxB1E4.5y2@mach1.wlu.ca>, sche7135@mach1.wlu.ca (Scott Schelter u) writes:
> 	FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 
>      That's right folks! I'm looking for the most graphic, verbose
> flames and insults you can muster. Gimme' something really juicy.
> 
> 
>                 SCOTTY LE DOG
>                 sche7135@mach1.wlu.ca
> 
> 
>         No mail-bombs please .
> 
> 

I am initiating my Flamer's right #113, section 2, paragraph B, item 1.

 I refuse to flame you at your request, to get a good response, post something
really stupid and idiotic, not this childish crap.  Flame me, Flame me.

 How wimpy can you get, post something about my mother, then I will take you
down, you wasted filthy excuse for a NEWS user.  Get a life, not this virtual
world for the bored.  dolt. Imbecile.  Get a life, I say again.

thank you.

*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
                                           
*-------*  What Rolls down stairs,              
|     S |  Alone or in pairs,             
| R   T |  Rolls over your neighbors dog? 
| E & I | 
| N   M |  What's great for a snack, fits on you back?
|     P |
|     Y |  It's log, log, log!
*-------*                                         Chad "Ren" Wilson

*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
From: tilden@goldwing.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Date: 9 Nov 1992 13:04:59 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: goldwing.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <BxB602.E6L@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>In article <1dbjpcINNoub@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>>In article <Bx5vzy.208@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>
>>>K e n does not bore people, for K e n is K e n, and K e n can only be
>>>K e n, thus K e n is K e n and only K e n.
>>>
>>
>>Wait wait wait a minute...K e n is K e n, therefore K e n does not bore people?
>>I'm having a problem with the logical connection between the two...
>
>Simple, K e n is K e n, and since K e n is K e n, then K e n is K e n,
>and thus K e n is not boring, for K e n can only be K e n.
>
>K e n   R o b i n s o n

Does K e n have the ability to fucking well refer to himself in the first person?
We know K e n is K e n, But K e n is also a fucking dipshit in the honest oppinion
of several million people viewing this part of the net.
Also, stop trying to be Zen Budda for us and get a life K E N !!!!!!

Tilden-Master of Illogic, first born of all that is to come
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: thester@nyx.cs.du.edu (Uncle Fester)
Subject: Re: Lame Flame
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 07:55:55 GMT

In article <911.1557.uupcb@synapse.org> amanda.vantslot@synapse.org (Aman
a Vantslot)  writes:
>TO: alt.flame
>FROM: amanda.vantslot@synapse.org
>
>>      AMANDA,  YOU IGNORANT SLOT!
>>
>>      No flame.  Just wanted to get that off my chest.
>>      Thank you.
>>
>>      -- Andy
>
>That has got to be the most pathetic insult I have ever heard.  How old
>are you 6, 7?  Go back to your fingerpainting.
>                           A. van't Slot
>                          


(knowing I probably shouldn't ask this)

Have you never seen Saturday Night Live?

He was (I assume) making a joke.

-UF

--
:  Pat Robertson on the   : It is about a socialist, anti-family political :
: Equal Rights Amendment  : movement that encourages women to leave their  :
:      *     *     *      : husbands, kill their children, practice witch- :
:  thester@nyx.cs.du.edu  : craft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians. :
From: 187701458@ucis.vill.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Date: 4 Nov 92 21:38:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Villanova University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1

In article <Bx5vzy.208@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes...
>In article <Bx4sFp.8HK@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>>OK.  So I really want to know...
>>
>>Do you use the door at El Chico's that says Hombres or Senoritas?
>>What side of your shirts are your buttons on?
>>What section of the Sunday church choir do you sing in, Aza?
>>
>>Ken, bore him/her until he/she cracks and tells me what I want to know.

> 
>K e n does not bore people, for K e n is K e n, and K e n can only be
>K e n, thus K e n is K e n and only K e n.
> 
>K e n   R o b i n s o n

	* YAWN *. Ken, your repeated android routine IS boring. YOU appear
to be quite misinformed. So, initiate standard washing procedures on yourself
or whatever it is you do.

					TTFN,

					Jagdeep
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Subject: Re: Vendetta? What vendetta?
Organization: University of Northern Indiana
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 15:11:55 GMT

In article <#ar1rf+@rpi.edu>, keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
>glads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone) writes:
>->You're a sick man, keegan.
>
>and here i thought you wanted to be my friend......
>
Well yes, I do.  There's no conflict here.  After all Ken and Kevin are
my friends.

Melvin M. Gladstone
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Date: 6 Nov 92 21:20:21 GMT
Organization: University of Northern Indiana

In article <BxB602.E6L@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>In article <1dbjpcINNoub@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>>In article <Bx5vzy.208@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>
>>>K e n does not bore people, for K e n is K e n, and K e n can only be
>>>K e n, thus K e n is K e n and only K e n.
>>>
>>
>>Wait wait wait a minute...K e n is K e n, therefore K e n does not bore people?
>>I'm having a problem with the logical connection between the two...
>
>Simple, K e n is K e n, and since K e n is K e n, then K e n is K e n,
>and thus K e n is not boring, for K e n can only be K e n.
>

While you are correct in asserting that ken is ken, this does not
preclude ken from also being boring.  Ken can be BOTH ken and
boring.  Example:  4 = 4 = 3 + 1,  ken is ken is boring.  If ken
is equivalent to boring, then ken can be only ken and still be
boring, just as 4 can only be 4 but can be 3 + 1 as well. 

>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>
Human tetherball, I like it.



 ___        ___    _______   __    ___        ___   ______   ___     __
|   \      /   |  |   ____| |  |   \  \      /  /  |_    _| |   \   |  |
|    \    /    |  |  |      |  |    \  \    /  /     |  |   |    \  |  |
|     \  /     |  |  |___   |  |     \  \  /  /      |  |   |     \ |  |
|  |\  \/  /|  |  |   ___|  |  |      \  \/  /       |  |   |  |\  \|  |
|  | \    / |  |  |  |      |  |       \    /        |  |   |  | \     |
|  |  \  /  |  |  |  |____  |  |____    \  /        _|  |_  |  |  \    | 
|__|   \/   |__|  |_______| |_______|    \/        |______| |__|   \___|

 ___        ___    ______    __        __            __        ________
|   \      /   |  |_    _|  |  |      |  |          /  \      |   ____  \
|    \    /    |    |  |    |  |      |  |         /    \     |  |    |  |
|     \  /     |    |  |    |  |      |  |        /  /\  \    |  |____|  |
|  |\  \/  /|  |    |  |    |  |      |  |       /  /__\  \   |   ____  <
|  | \    / |  |    |  |    |  |      |  |      |   ____   |  |  |    |  |
|  |  \  /  |  |   _|  |_   |  |____  |  |____  |  |    |  |  |  |    |  |
|__|   \/   |__|  |______|  |_______| |_______| |__|    |__|  |__|    |__| D

 __________    __            __       ________      _______    ________
|   ____   |  |  |          /  \     |   ___  \    /  ___  \  |__    __|
|  |    |__|  |  |         /    \    |  |   |  |  |  |   |__|    |  |
|  |          |  |        /  /\  \   |  |   |  |  |  |_____      |  |
|  |   ____   |  |       /  /__\  \  |  |   |  |   \_____  \     |  |
|  |  |_   |  |  |      |   ____   | |  |   |  |   __    |  |    |  |
|  |____|  |  |  |____  |  |    |  | |  |___|  |  |  |___|  |    |  |
|__________|  |_______| |__|    |__| |________/    \_______/     |__| O N E

There wasn't quite enough room.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: Trish
Followup-To: alt.net-idiots
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 14:02:16 GMT

rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) writes:
->tad@sdf.lonestar.org (Tad Dowe) writes:
->>Where is Trish these days? It has been a couple of years since I have read
->>the net and I have lost touch. 

->You had already lost touch long before you left the net, hon.

perhaps tad should get in touch with kebbin. they have
much in common.

->---------------
->Ah!  First it was a request that we assume no credentials.  Now we are
->supposed to assume no *formal* credentials.  Next we are to assume that
->Kevin is always right.
->				-- q@access.digex.com (The Omnipotent)
->				<1992Jan9.091839.6345@access.digex.com>
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: I told you so.  [Was Re: Rabbit-knowing]
Date: 9 Nov 92 00:48:47 GMT
Distribution: rec,world
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

wd5j@vax5.cit.cornell.edu writes:
>Hey, wait a minute.  I'm a rec.pets.nerd, just browsing through the newsgroups
>and saw Re: Rabbit-knowing as a subject heading.  That was MY post a few weeks
>ago, and I'd love to know what the original alt.flame posting was in response
>to.  Would someone let me know?  Why would a post about a pet rabbit generate
>hostility?  Thanks for replies.
>
>Ilana


  See Rob?  I'm psychic.  And a very good political prognosticator too.

  -- Andy
From: jessop@ljohub.enet.dec.com (Class Dinosauria)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Two words that flame me to the core...
Date: 9 Nov 92 17:14:03 GMT
Reply-To: jessop@ljohub.enet.dec.com (Class Dinosauria)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation





	BOB SAGGITT!!!!!!!!


	AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHRRRRGGGHHHHHH!!!!


	Whew!  Much better.
Newsgroups: alt.flame