HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: maxc1104@ucselx.sdsu.edu (Generic Account 1104)
Subject: Re: Nosferatu - The Vampyre?
Organization: SDSU Computing Services
Distribution: alt.cult-movies, alt.horror 
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 18:11:09 GMT

In article <BuCpLM.HHF@agora.rain.com> hopkins@agora.rain.com (Scott Hopkins) writes:
>	Anyone know how to get a copy of the remake of Nosferatu -
>Nosferatu - The Vampyre?  I don't think it has been released on video or
>laserdisc yet, but it's worth a shot.  Anyone seen it?  How does it compare
>to the first and the novel?
>
>			-Casey Hopkins
>			hopkins@agora.rain.com
>
>	BTW, it has Klaus Kinski in it.
>

  Yes! About two years ago, I saw it on a double feature with Roman Polanski's
_The Fearless Vampire Killers_ at the local repertory theatre.
  I can't say how it compares to the novel, since I never read it. However,
I _have_ seen the original '22 _Nosferatu_. Both have the same problem, I'm
afraid: they're atmospheric, but silly. Werner Herzog gets in a few neat
shots (always his forte), but I can see why it hasn't been released on video
or LD. Siskel & Ebert were rather fond of it, though, so I guess all you
vampire fans out there will have to decide for yourselves whether or not
it hits the mark.
  If anyone cares, there's a sequel (!!) called _Nosferatu in Venice_, 
with Kinski but not Herzog. It, too, remains unreleased on video and LD.

                                                  Love & kisses,

                                             The Stainless Steel Moviegoer

                                                  Zombies are people too.

Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally)
Subject: Re: Movies you heard were good but sucked
Reply-To: shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 92 20:15:15 GMT

In article <chil.715671726@sfu.ca>, chil@fraser.sfu.ca (Keith Lim) writes:
|> Pretty Woman
|> sex, lies, and videotape
|> Barton Fink (with the exception of the corridor-bursting-into-fire scene)
|> 
|> Oh, and another movie that I was embarrassed to see: Superman IV.
|> 
|> -- 
|> Keith_Lim@sfu.ca   Simon Fraser University, Burnaby B.C., V5A 1S6, Canada
|> >Opinions above are probably my own only...too weird to be anyone else's.<
|> 
|> "I can't be sure where I'm headed after death/To heaven, hell, or beyond to
|>  that Great Vast/But if I can I would like to meet my Maker/There's one or
|>  two things I'd sure like to ask"      --Crash Test Dummies, "At My Funeral"


Sex, Lies and Videotape was great ! You were perhaps expecting something
else but the intensity and the way it explores sexual relationships is
amazing. And considering almost all of it is just interior shots of a
handful of actors. No special effects or anyhting ! Pretty amazing.

Robin Hood was emabarassing to see. Considering all the hype ...
Costner's accent was the biggest joke in that film. Rickman's performance
was way over the top ! I suppose it could become a cult film because
of all these unintentionally funny things. No comparison to the classic
Errol Flynn swashbuckler.
From: fnord@panix.com (Cliff Heller)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Hudson Hawk
Date: 10 Sep 92 14:56:46 GMT
Organization: Right Bleedin' Church of Libertine Obfuscatology

Hey, this movie turned out to be pretty excellent.

I think what happened was that the previews led people to expect another
Die Hard.  This was a bit too goofy, and the characterizations were WAY
OUT.  So it bombed.

However, isn't that so often what makes a cult film?  Not like Slacker
which was designed and marketed as a cult film.

Anyway, The movie is fast paced, with lots of comic book style gratuitous
violence, great interplay between Bruce Willis and Danny DeVito, and an A+
performance by Sandra Bernhard (better even than in The King of Comedy).

Get the video if you dont believe me.





-- 
    / \      Reverend fnord                 | "King Kong died for your sins!"
   /   \     fnord@panix.com                | 
  / <0> \                                   | "Don't just eat a hamburger, 
 /_______\   Church of Obfuscatology, Inc.  |  eat the HELL out of it!"
From: donnell@squid.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Lovecraft movie
Date: 11 Sep 92 21:48:45 GMT
Organization: none

In article <BuFKFL.2CH@nntp-sc.Intel.COM> mdouglas@cad067.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Maria Douglas ~) writes:
>In article <batemanc.715962434@p4.cs.man.ac.uk>, batemanc@p4.cs.man.ac.uk (Mad Chris) writes:
>|> espensk@stud.cs.uit.no (Espen Skoglund) inquires:
>|> 
>|> >I recently snapped up some rumours about a movie based
>|> >on H.P.Lovecrafts "The Case of Charles Dexter Ward",
>|> >but I have no idea of what the name of it is.
>|> >If someone out there has some information, please let me
>|> >know.
>|> >I would also be glad to hear about other movies inspiered/
>|> >based on his works.
>|> 
>|> To the best of my knowledge there are at least four:
>|> 
>|> 'Reanimator'
>|> 'Reanimator II'
>|> 'From Beyond'
>|> 'The Unnamable' (truly dreadful)
>|> 
>|> I also know of a version of 'The Shuttered Room' and (I think) 'The
>|> Dunwich Horror' but I forget what those films are called. I'm willing
>|> to bet someone can set me straight.
>|> 
>|> Mad Chris.
>
>-- 
>I've read all the other replies to this poor guy's question, and
>no one else seems to know.  The movie you are looking for, Espen,
>is called "The Resurrected."  You will recognize a lot of the
>actors/actress (I don't know their names), and the acting stinks,
>but it is, IMHO, THE BEST Lovecraftian film ever made, true to the
>story and the genre (not to mention the role-playing game :-).
>DO rent this if you can.  It's a modern retelling of "Charles Dexter
>Ward," but it still largely retains the flavor of the older setting.
>
>Hope you like it, too!
>
>Maria
>--
>Maria E. Douglas	(408) 765-4728
>Intel Corporation	mdouglas@cadev6.intel.com
>
>"Are you mental?"
>
>	W. Campbell
>

 Just a minor quibble, but why would anyone care that a movie based on a 
short story is true to a game that borrowed the whole setup as soon as the
material came into public domain, damn near?
I wwould like to believe that the heirs to Lovecrafts estate make money off
of all this stuff, but somehow I doubt it. It has been too long.

					--Judex--
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies,rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies
From: robb@maths.tcd.ie (Robert Bashford)
Subject: Re: Various stuff RE Aliens, Terminator, etc.
Organization: Dept. of Maths, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 11:00:02 GMT

greg@ctpm.uq.oz.au (Greg Hall) writes:
>	Can I give the awards for the directors who reuse
>	actors/actresses the most to James Cameron and
>	David Lynch (Jack Nance, Laura Dern, etc) ?
 
 what about a runners up award for  Scorcese (de niro,pesci) 

            ,,    ,,    
            ||    ||    
,._-_  /'\\ ||/|, ||/|, 
 ||   || || || || || || @salmon.maths.tcd.ie 
 ||   || || || |' || |' I feel a tug on the line,which end?
  \\,  \\,/  \\/   \\/    will i be on this time...
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: donnell@squid.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Subject: Re: wait a minute
Organization: none
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:04:37 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.183310.20515@news.iastate.edu> tzau4@isuvax.iastate.edu writes:
>A few posts back ther was mention of an extended LawnMower Man?
>WHo what whene wher why how?
>

The video release of Lawnmower Man, is an extended, supposedly "Directors"
cut. The additional footage seems to be mostly characterization.
Roscoe the chimps escape form the lab is different, and most notably,
Brosnan's girlfriend has a very different part. 
NO new effects scenes, as far as I could tell.

					--Judex--

Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: jutta@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de (Jutta Degener)
Subject: Re: Naked Lunch
Organization: Techn. University of Berlin, Germany
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 20:12:58 GMT

carlj@muppet.bt.co.uk (Carl Johnson) writes:
> How much have you read?  His earlier stuff "Queer", "Junkie" is more
> "normal" ;}

I thought "Queer" was by Burroughs' _son_; readable, but pale in
comparison.  I second the recommendation of "Literary Outlaw", it's
a gripping portrait not only of Burroughs, but of the whole American
literary scene of that time.

"Junkie" was what first turned me on to Burroughs.  I tried to
convince my English teacher to use it as reading material in class,
but the bookstore she visited after my recommendation didn't stack
it, so she bought "Naked Lunch" instead.  That look on her face
still haunts me.

If you can, see or hear Burroughs read, in person.  There is at
least one movie portrait, it was shown at a festival here a few
years ago.  That one, "Decoder" and "Naked Lunch" could make a
good `Long Night of the Mugwump'.

Jutta
From: rkim@CALSTATELA.EDU ("Richard H.S. Kim")
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Minor goof in theater dates (was Re: Bladerunner...)
Date: 11 Sep 92 05:10:53 GMT

| In article <199209100325.AA23172@opus.calstatela.edu> Rich writes:
|
|| In article <1992Sep9.160949.6048@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> Pieter writes:
||
|| For you Info:
||
|| Blade Runner Director's Cut is playing at the Mann Theatre
|| in Westwood.  Rumor has it it will open at the Rialto
|| in South Pasadena (a much better theatre for BR, IMHO).
||
||- Pieter
||
||--
|| Pieter Kallemeyn                     |   phk@aristotle.jpl.nasa.gov
|| Jet Propulsion Laboratory            |          - or - 
|| California Institute of Technology   |   phk@charybdis.jpl.nasa.gov
|
|No rumor, the Rialto in S. Pasadena will show it on the 11th.  However,
                                                         ^^
Oops!  The Rialto will show Blade Runner on Oct. 2nd.  Currently,
Enchanted April is playing.

|since Blade Runner is a WIDE screen film, the Rialto would probably
|crop it (like they did at the Nuart), makeing it feel like a regular
|movie.  If you can, make sure the theater will display it on a wide
|screen.

The Mann Theatre in Westwood will play BR on Sept 11th.  Sorry for the
confusion.

Rich K.
From: carlj@muppet.bt.co.uk (Carl Johnson)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Naked Lunch
Date: 10 Sep 92 08:51:35 GMT
Reply-To: carlj@muppet.bt.co.uk
Organization: British Telecom

In article 4373@cs.tu-berlin.de, jutta@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de (Jutta Degener) writes:
=I thought "Queer" was by Burroughs' _son_; readable, but pale in
=comparison.  

Nope, it was Bill, tho I beleive (I dont have the biography with me) that it
originally came out under the name William Lee, because Bill was afraid of 
his parents "finding out".

=I second the recommendation of "Literary Outlaw", it's
=a gripping portrait not only of Burroughs, but of the whole American
=literary scene of that time.

I dont know about the "whole American literary scene" but certainly the 
Beat movement, further recommened reading along the same lines would be
the excellent Allen Ginsberg biography and _Memory_Babe_ a Kerouac 
biography which both detail Bills' influence on them.

="Junkie" was what first turned me on to Burroughs.  I tried to
=convince my English teacher to use it as reading material in class,
=but the bookstore she visited after my recommendation didn't stack
=it, so she bought "Naked Lunch" instead.  That look on her face
=still haunts me.

good one! :) Wish I'd tried that. :)

=
=If you can, see or hear Burroughs read, in person.  There is at
=least one movie portrait, it was shown at a festival here a few
=years ago.  That one, "Decoder" and "Naked Lunch" could make a
=good `Long Night of the Mugwump'.
=

I agree, I saw a documentary on 50's america a couple of months back
that had Bill and Allen Ginsberg on, very funny.  I'll try and find the
film you're talking about, but whats "Decoder"? Never heard of it.

Cheers,
C
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: glongiii@nyx.cs.du.edu (George Long)
Subject: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 22:06:53 GMT


I suppose my title is kind of a misnomer, because this really isn't the
most embarassing movie, but it was the most disappointing movie I've ever
seen.  

Cape Fear (the remake) sucked in all departments.  Yes, even DeNiro seemed
to phone in his patented psycho routine.  The whole movie, from the heavy
handed direction to the lousy acting (Juliette Lewis especially--what the
hell is the deal with her?) made me glad that I only paid two bucks to see
this when it was on campus.

Bad, bad, bad.


Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: mdouglas@cad067.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Maria Douglas ~)
Subject: Re: Buckaroo Banzai question
Organization: Intel Corp.
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:51:29 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.110951.9577@bsu-ucs.uucp>, 00njhavert@bsu-ucs.uucp writes:
|> 
|> 	This morning I remembered seeing Buckaroo Banzai YEARS ago. I
|> mean, when I was still in middle school. Sad to say, I always fell asleep.
|> Can anyone give me a plot synopsis? I thought this movie might be good to
|> see now that I'm older and could appreciate it more.
|> 
|> Nik

-- 
O.K., here goes!  It's *really* confusing, though...

Buckaroo Banzai, brain surgeon-physicist-rock star-extraordinaire, creates
a device called the "oscillation overthruster": the overthruster pushes
aside molecules allowing the user to move *between* them.  He attaches the
device to a high-speed car and stuns the world by driving through a mountain.
What he either doesn't know or at least speculates is that the
overthruster actually opens the door to the 8th dimension, where a gaggle
of criminal aliens (the Lectoids) are trapped.  Dr. Lizardo, another
scientist, created a similar "overthruster" back in the 40s (?), and
accidentally opened the door to the 8th dimension far enough to let an
alien escape...it possessed his mind, and now Dr. Lizardo is in a mental
institution.  The Lectoid possessing his brain fights for control of his
consciousness and secretly plots with other Lectoids to steal Buckaroo's
overthruster so that they can go back to Planet 10, their home planet
from whence they were banished.  (I can't remember how these other Lectoids
escaped, but I think Dr. Lizardo helped them escape before he was caught
and thrown in the looney bin.)

The thrust of the adventure (sorry for the pun) is Buckaroo Banzai and his
crowd battle the Lectoids to retrieve the (eventually) stolen overthruster.
The reason this is so important is that the "non-criminal" Lectoids who
already live on Planet 10 are mad as hell at Buckaroo, and they threaten
to start a nuclear war on our planet if Buckaroo and his bunch don't get
back that overthruster and prevent the criminals from returning.

I hope that's not too much!  I tried for the essence of the story (honest!).

Maria
--
Maria E. Douglas	(408) 765-4728
Intel Corporation	mdouglas@cadev6.intel.com

"It bit his head off--like a GINGERBREAD man!"

	From Beyond
From: ckt4x@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Curt Tsui)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Nosferatu - The Vampyre?
Date: 10 Sep 92 16:37:48 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

hopkins@agora.rain.com  writes:
> 	Anyone know how to get a copy of the remake of Nosferatu -
> Nosferatu - The Vampyre?  I don't think it has been released on video or
> laserdisc yet, but it's worth a shot.  Anyone seen it?  How does it compare
> to the first and the novel?
> 
> 			-Casey Hopkins
> 			hopkins@agora.rain.com
> 
> 	BTW, it has Klaus Kinski in it.
> 
I got a copy of this film on video from an outfit called Mondo
Video.  I just found out, though, that it isn't the same as the
theatrical release which apparently was in German with
subtitles and a different score.  I didn't find any problems
with the changes (probably since I never saw the original.
Someone on rec.arts.movies who corrected my assumption that I
had the original theatrical release on video said the original
is much better).  So, it is available (as a bootleg) but you
may not want it if you want the altered version.
--
                               - Curt Tsui -
      			     curt@Virginia.EDU
   "Happiness might very well be a glandular condition." - David Cronenberg 
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: tzau4@isuvax.iastate.edu
Subject: wait a minute
Reply-To: tzau4@isuvax.iastate.edu
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 18:33:10 GMT

A few posts back ther was mention of an extended LawnMower Man?
WHo what whene wher why how?

Organization: Senior, Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies,alt.fan.mike-jittlov
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 20:49:49 -0400 
From: Christopher Brian Cox <cc4b+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: WIZARD's "Up-Hill Biking" - the TRUTH


In reference to single stepping:

Does WoSaT exist in 3/4" Umatic or Beta SP formats?
Or something with enough video quality that we can single step without
hurting our eyes?
(The next question being - how can I get ahold of such a copy?)

Chris

ps.   @sutheren{Oh my GAWD, now we got cousins postin on the same
bboard, what will the world come to?}
From: ntraven@wuntvor.norman.ok.us (The Night Raven)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Nicol Williamson
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 16:53:56 CDT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Eternal Apprentice BBS, Norman, OK

     I may have my Nicol's mixed up, but didn't he play Barrymore in the
Broadway production of I Hate Hamlet?  

NR

--
ntraven@wuntvor.norman.ok.us (The Night Raven)
The Eternal Apprentice BBS, Norman, OK -- +1 405 325 9607
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: dsc@gemini.tmc.edu (Doug S. Caprette Bldg. 28 W191 x3892)
Subject: BL--Director's Cut
Organization: NASA GSFC CDP VLBI
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 21:40:49 GMT



Well, I haven't seen it mentioned yet so here are two comments concerning some
of the better known technical/continuity goofs in BL:

In the director's cut, in the first scene of Roy clenching his hand (before
ever we even see his face), I couldn't see the nail sticking out the back of
his hand any more, as in previous versions. 

Also in the director's cut:
When Deckard arrives at Bryant's office, Bryant now says:
"I've got four skin jobs walking the streets."  instead of:
"I've got five skin jobs walking the streets."  as in previous versions.

But, he later says something to the effect of: 
"Six replicants, three female, three male, jumped a shuttle... one was fried..."
(leaving five--one too many.)

So the goof is only half fixed in the Director's cut, unless you want to 
make the silly wild-ass assumption that the sixth replicant was captured 
during their first attempt at infiltrating Tyrell corporation, and Tyrell
reprogramed it as Rachel, Deckard, or Holden!  Maybe Bryant slipped up when
talking to Deckard. (:-)

The other well known BL continuity/editing/technical goofs seem to remain.
(e.g. cables visible on rising police car, Tyrell's hand on Roy's shoulder
when we first see Roy's face, Joanna Cassidy's stunt double that doesn't 
look much like her...)

dsc@gemini.gsfc.nasa.gov  
 |  Regards,         |   Hughes STX                |    Code 926.9 GSFC        |
 |  Doug Caprette    |   Lanham, Maryland          |    Greenbelt, MD  20771   |
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"That's the spirit!" -- Roy Batty
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: tzau4@isuvax.iastate.edu
Subject: WIll SOMEONE PLEASE POST THE FAQ
Reply-To: tzau4@isuvax.iastate.edu
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 15:07:58 GMT

Can anyone/Will anyone post the FAQ?

thank you

Xref: sparky alt.cult-movies:7618 rec.arts.sf.movies:6945 dc.general:2113
From: ansok@stsci.edu (Gary Ansok)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,dc.general
Subject: Re: Director's cut of Bladerunner: When?
Date: 8 Sep 92 18:24:20 GMT
Reply-To: ansok@stsci.edu (Gary Ansok)
Distribution: usa
Organization: TRW, c/o Space Telescope Science Inst., Baltimore, MD

In article <Bu9MwK.18G@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tjz20735@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Tom Zych) writes:
>wherndon@smiley.mitre.org (William Herndon) writes:
>>    When in Austin, TX recently I saw a movie bill that indicated that 
>>    the director's cut of Bladerunner would be in theaters on September
>>    11th, but I can find no independant confirmation, and I've seen 
>>    nothing about the new Bladerunner release in the DC area at all.
>
>It opens in Chicago on the 11th.  At exactly _one_ theater.  (Loews Fine Arts
>Theater)  It's possible that no one in DC is going to show it at all.   

I don't know about DC, but it's going to open on the north side of
Baltimore this Friday at the Loews Timonium.

The ad in the Baltimore _Sun_ says "Exclusive Engagement", but that
usually doesn't mean exclusive to DC *and* Balto, so there may be a
theater near DC showing it.

Gary
-- 
Gary Ansok           ansok@stsci.edu
A second Flood, a simple famine, plagues of locusts everywhere,
Or a cataclysmic earthquake I'd accept with some despair.
But no...You sent us Congress.  Good God, Sir, was that fair?
From: st1or@rosie.uh.edu (Brod, Cathy M.)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Ann Rice --movies?
Date: 11 Sep 92 18:21:00 GMT
Organization: University of Houston
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


   I have heard many rumors of Ann Rice's book "The Witching Hour" is being 
 turnd into a movie. Is this so? If so when (approx). 
 Any word on any of the Vampire novels inspiring a movie? Who owns the rights 
 these (if not Ann Rice)?

                               THANKS
From: eric@hp-ptp.ptp.hp.com (Eric Tend)
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 20:34:11 GMT
Subject: Re: John Woo's HARD-BOILED in S.F.???
Organization: HP Pacific Technology Park - Sunnyvale, Ca.
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies


I got someone to translate the phone message and this is the info :

     main feature : HARD-BOILED       showtimes:  2:10, 6:05, 9:50
     2nd  feature : CONTUN TEA HOUSE  showtimes: 12:30, 4:25, 8:10

The movie will only play through the weekend (Fri, Sat, Sun) and a movie
change will occur on Monday.

--Eric--
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: stame@emunix.emich.edu (Stewart Tame)
Subject: Re: Drowning by Numbers
Organization: Eastern Michigan University
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 15:49:17 GMT

In article <9209111202.AA11186@cs.utexas.edu> EEC@PORTIA.UMDS.LON.AC.UK (Steve P eec@portia.umds.lon.ac.uk) writes:
>Peter G also did a TV version of Dante's Inferno, which was shown by
>Channel 4 (UK) last year.  As usual, piles of naked bodies and this was at
>2pm on an Xmas afternoon !
>
>Btw, his collaborator on the film was the artist Tom Phillips, who just
>happens to be my Dad's cousin.....
>
>PS  The rest of Greenaway's films are crap....
>

Speaking of Greenaway's TV work, does anyone know anything about some
music documentaries he apparently directed?  I remember seeing them in
a local record store once.  There were two and they were supposedly part
of a series of four but I've never seen the other two.  One was about
Philip Glass and the other was (I think) about John Cage.  They seemed
pretty interesting but I couldn't afford them and am currently VCR-less
anyway.  I'd love to know more about them though . . . 

		-- Stewart "and now, for your listening enjoyment, a
				computerized version of Cage's famous
				4'33" . . . 














							(Don't scroll too
							fast now or you'll
							mess up the timing)
							. . . " Tame

****************************************************************************
 I understand it's obligatory to mention Kibo somewhere in one's postings.
****************************************************************************
		Email:  stame@emunix.emich.edu
****************************************************************************
Disclaimer:  Not only do my opinions represent those of Eastern Michigan
University, but also those of Dan Quayle, Richard Nixon, Frank Zappa,
Pee-wee Herman, Bart Simpson, Tipper Gore, Murphy Brown, Maggie Thatcher,
and the Easter Bunny.
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies,alt.fan.mike-jittlov