HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: roe@Unibase.SK.CA (Roe Peterson)
Subject: Re: help! error 6 installing sas 1.25/fas
Organization: Unibase Telecom Ltd.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 15:59:10 GMT

bmyers@mcopn3.dseg.ti.com writes:

>I need some help/advise with installing sas-1.25 (fas.2.09) on my SVR4
>system (aka Consensys V4).

>I followed the instructions given in the sas-related README file, and
>pulled in the files for a com1-2 board.  I performed the make install,
>and then tried to reboot the system...

How embarassing.  I've just looked through the installation instructions
distributed with SAS 1.25, and realize that there should be a step
after 'make install':
	2.5 /etc/conf/bin/idbuild - this will generate a new kernel.

>oh well, didn't see in the docs anything about actually using mkdev
>on creating the ttyF00/ttyF01/ttyFM00/ttyFM01 special devices.

That's because such a step is not required.  If you idbuild a new kernel,
the next reboot will rebuild the /dev directory.  Sas installs a descriptor
file for itself in /etc/conf/node.d, which will create all your /dev/tty...
nodes.

>after creating these, I tried to do a
>t01:23:respawn:/sbin/getty -t 60 ttyF01 19200NP   (whatever the incoming was)
>and got a message from the system, telling me that it couldn't open the
>device: Init error 6.  this message popped up repeatedly, until I was
>able to modify the inittab file to go back to tty01.

Not a bit surprising;  error 6 is ENXIO (no such device or address).  It
means that SAS is not _really_ installed in your kernel.

Also, you will need to deactivate the standard asy driver before running
the idbuild successfully, since asy and sas will conflict with each
other, causing errors.

>I thought that the 2.0 release of SASS was to occur 
>about a month ago...but haven't heard anything yet...

Apologies to the net at large for the long delay, and thanks for your
patience.  SASS 2.0 has been delayed for a number of reasons:
	- a recent posting of bug-fixes to FAS 2.09 has shown some
	  problems and fixes for SASS, which we are incorporating.
	- I decided to complete the VPIX support by adding com-style
	  handlers (the console-mode stuff is already in place).
	- My co-conspirator is in California on vacation :-)
	- 386BSD 0.1 was released.

I'll get it out the door as soon as possible.  Thanks again for your
support.
the incorporation of COM-style VPIX support, 
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: Use of scanners on SVR4
Organization: The Gator Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-3745
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 10:43:55 GMT

davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen) writes:

>  I briefly used some DOS software with an Epson 3000C and ran it under
>merge in Dell. I confess that I used the SCO merge manual to figure out
>the options to allow the software to diddle the ports directly, but the
>point is that it worked. I finally gave up and ran windows just to do
>the scanning, because the DOS software was really bad, and the Windows
>based software is mediocre.

Have you played (or was this) windows under Merge?

-- 
Larry Snyder
larry@gator.rn.com
From: root@admin.mport.COM (Admin administration)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Additional info needed -Sas!
Date: 19 Aug 92 21:51:23 GMT
Organization: Microport Inc., Scotts Valley, CA 95066 US of A

bmyers@shyguy.lonestar.org (bob myers) writes:

>I've just got the msg about having to do the /etc/conf/bin/idbuild,
>as part of the "make install" for sas 1.25.

>Now...How in the world do I turn off asy?

>I've tried editing some of the files in /etc/conf/rc.d, but don't seem
>to know what all to do to avoid seeing either messages about asy still
>being there and conflicting with sas, or that asy is missing from the 
>mdevice file.

=================================

You don't want to mess with that directory.  The files you need to edit are:

/etc/conf/sdevice.d/asy
/etc/conf/node.d/asy

sas will probably also have files in these directories.  I haven't installed
sas, so I'm making an assumption it uses the same mechanism as asy.

-rbd






>-- 
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Bob Myers (3-B Technology)         |  As the story goes...
>2479 Deer Run #1305                |   "A deranged mind is a terrible thing
>Lewisville, Tx.  75067             |      to waste..."
From: gantzm@gantz.bowlgreen.oh.us (Michael L. Gantz)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: SLIP Esix Sys V Rel 4.0.4
Date: 13 Aug 92 22:29:18 GMT
Organization: GantzNet - B.G., Ohio

Where can I get a working copy of SLIP for Esix SysV Rel 4.0.4?  The
SLIP that comes with the system tends to choke with NFS and a few
other things. 

Anything that I can just plug and play would be well appreciated.
Downloaded some slip code for SYSVR4 but keeps coughing on ioctl's
with TCGETA.

Any help well appreciated.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael L. Gantz        ! gantzm@gantz.bowlgreen.oh.us ! I know JCL and also
213 Napoleon Rd.        ! osu-cis!bgsuvax!gantz!gantzm ! use Unix.  No wonder
Bowling Green, Oh 43402 ! (419) 353-5029               ! I have problems.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst)
Subject: Re: Anyone get BIND 4.8.3 to work under System V
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 02:49:41 GMT
Organization: The Programmer's Pit Stop, Ann Arbor MI

In article <1992Aug19.225616.1492@tygra.Michigan.COM> jp@tygra.Michigan.COM (John Palmer) writes:
>CAT-TALK Conferencing System   | E-MAIL: jp@Michigan.COM
>+1 313 790 6426 (USR HST)      | MICHIGAN NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC.  
>+1 313 790 6432 (TELEBIT PEP)  | 800-736-5984  FAX: 313-790-6437 
>********EIGHT NODES*********** | TELEBIT, DIGIBOARD, ISC UNIX, MICROPOLIS

Hey John, don't you think you should stop advertising MNS and CAT-TALK
when they obviously don't exist anymore?  If you folks out on the net
don't believe me, try calling the numbers listed in his .signature
yourself.  EVERY SINGLE ONE of them has been disconnected.  Do I smell
a rat?

-- 
Marc Unangst                | Real men don't make backups.  Real men never
mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us   | accidentally delete files that they're going
                            | to need later.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser)
Subject: Re: Dell SVR4 (and Dell hardware)
Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix  (508) 655-3848
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 15:56:36 GMT

larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>The ATI ultra and Dell SVR4 will give most sparcstations a run for
>the money -- as a matter of fact, if you compare dollar per dollar,
>a ESIA 486/50 fully loaded will shine over most sparcs

Based on my experience with Sun machines, and my experiences with my 
one INTEL Unix machine (486/33, ESIX 3.2-d), there is one difference
that really stands out ...  Not Performance, but RELIABILITY.

A machine running SunOS will be much less likely to "hang" than the 
equivalent intel machine.  At least that has been my experience, but 
comparing esix 5.3 to Solaris 1.1 or even SunOS 4.0 is not a fair
comparison :-) :-)

-- 
bill@unixland.natick.ma.us                      ESIX Mailing List Moderator
Public Access UNIX/USENET/E-MAIL!  UUCP Accounts Available!  (508) 655-3848
5 lines  -  Located in Natick, MA   USA    Supporting V.32/PEP/V.42bis, etc.
From: edhall@rand.org (Ed Hall)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Dell SVR4: no SCSI support for Exabyte and/or CDROM?
Date: 21 Aug 92 00:13:41 GMT
Organization: RAND Corporation.

In article <1992Aug19.215506.7942@portal.hq.videocart.com> kdenning@portal.hq.videocart.com (Karl Denninger) writes:
>In article <rvdp.714220940@yam.sow.econ.vu.nl> rvdp@sow.econ.vu.nl (Ronald van der Pol) writes:
>>It looks like Dell SVR4 (Issue 2.1) does *not* support the SCSI
>>Exabyte 8200 and does *not* support CDROM.
>>When using the non-rewinding device with the Exabyte we get
>>I/O-errors. Also only 32k block writes seem to be supported.
 . . . .
>That's funny, we use an Exabyte here on an Intel machine with DELL SVR4
>issue 2.1 and it seems to work just fine..... (and we do multiple save-set
>backups).

Unless Dell has broken something, they should also support a Toshiba
3201A CD-ROM or similar with a 1542 SCSI controller.  It's in the
SVR4.0.3 release.  However, these are just the calls to control the
drive and read the data; you can't mount CD-ROMs as a filesystem,
alas.  Also, I can't vouch for their robustness, although I know folks
who have used them.

		-Ed Hall
		edhall@rand.org
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: dlparker@dlpinc00.rn.com (David L. Parker)
Subject: Re: Ethernet Cards -- Questions
Organization: Automated Data Management Services
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 12:42:54 GMT

In article <18338@polstra.UUCP> jdp@polstra.UUCP (John Polstra) writes:
>
>2. What are the common names (the names seen in advertisements) for the
>   Western Digital / SMC products?  I see a lot of ads for:
>
>	Ethercard-Plus 16
>	Ethercard Elite Plus 16-bit
>        etc.
>
>   Are these the same thing?  Do they correspond to the 8003, the 8013,
>   or neither?
>

The differences in the SMC Elite series, I believe, are in the available
connectors and 8 vs. 16 bit, for ISA and MC machines (not sure about EISA).
They are the SMC counterparts of the old WD80x3 line.  FI, I have the 
SMC Elite16T, which is a 16-bit card with 10baseT and AUI connectors, ISA
bus.  Under ISC TCP/IP 1.3, the driver is the wd[0-n], and is described as
supporting "...all WD80x3 boards announced prior to March 1991" in the
release notes for version 2.0 of the INTERACTIVE Network Drivers.  The
drivers are described during the sysadm installpkg routine as "Western
Digital EtherCard PLUS".  

The drivers (for the SMC) under FTP, Inc.'s PC/TCP are also for the WD 80x3
cards.  I think the 80x3 refers to the chip that the card itself is built
around, and I believe this is still made by WD.  Anyone know??
-- 
Dave Parker
Automated Data Management Services, Pleasant Hill, MO 64080-1331
(816) 987-5167/5218 voice/fax
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: roe@Unibase.SK.CA (Roe Peterson)
Subject: Re: Additional info needed -Sas!
Organization: Unibase Telecom Ltd.
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 18:30:20 GMT

bmyers@shyguy.lonestar.org (bob myers) writes:

>I've just got the msg about having to do the /etc/conf/bin/idbuild,
>as part of the "make install" for sas 1.25.

>Now...How in the world do I turn off asy?

go to /etc/conf/sdevice.d, and edit the file therein called asy.  Change all
the Y to N.  Then, run another idbuild.  Reboot.

BTW: make sure to change /etc/ap/chan.ap.

>thanks for all help...


No problem.

Xref: sparky comp.unix.sysv386:13435 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:4167
From: jessea@homecare.com (Jesse W. Asher)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: SCO ODT 2.0 having troubles talking to Netblazers?
Date: 22 Aug 92 14:47:53 GMT
Organization: G.O.D Inc.

Is anyone out there having problems with the tcp/ip that comes with
SCO ODT 2.0?  We installed ODT 2.0 and found that we had some problems
talking to remote Netblazers.  We were told it was because the tcp/ip
that comes with ODT 2.0 is based on an RFC that isn't current and the
Netblazers are based on the most current.  Can anyone verify this?
Are we going to continue having problems with this tcp/ip?

-- 
      Jesse W. Asher                                   Phone: (901)762-6000
                         Varco-Pruden Buildings
	      6000 Poplar Ave., Suite 400, Memphis, TN  38119
 Internet: jessea@homecare.COM                 UUCP: ...!banana!homecare!jessea
From: fr@compu.com (Fred Rump from home)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: SCSI II
Date: 18 Aug 92 03:25:55 GMT
Organization: CompuData Inc.

bob@consult.UUCP (Bob Willey CDP) writes:

>We went thru this for a client a few months ago.
>We took the chance and upgraded their drive to a SCSI-II drive under
>SCO Xenix 386 yet...  And it worked just fine.

I'm told locally (at work) that we only use a real scsi II 
drives/controllers/software combination in our Altos line.  That especially
the 4500 has it's act together on the I/O side of the fence.  Seems like
special cableing and drivers that aren't available in stock SCO stuff yet.

But I don't know enough about this and thought maybe the wisdom of the net 
would be able to help. Perhaps not. 

I know we can buy fast Fujitsu and Wren drives but I doubt that their power 
and speed is being fully used as yet with stock software.

Fred

-- 
W. Fred Rump 	office:	   fred@COMPU.COM     'mans feet have grown/so big 
26 Warren St.   home: fred@icdi10.compu.com  that he/forgets his littleness'
Beverly, NJ. 08010                          		Don Marquis 
609-386-6846    bang:uunet!cdin-1!icdi10!fr   
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: rn under Dell unix.
Organization: The Gator Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-3745
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 01:06:56 GMT

eric@tantalus.dell.com (Eric Youngdale) writes:

>	I am having trouble with the rn newsreader under Dell release 2.1.
>Specifically, it posts articles with a return address of
>eric@tantalus.dell.com, where my real return address is
>eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil.  I grepped every file in /usr/dell... and replaced
>every dell.com with nrl.navy.mil, and rn *still* (at least the last time I
>checked.  Just watch, this time it will get it right) is reporting a return
>address at dell.  I can send regular mail with sendmail all day long and I
>never have any difficulty.  Does anyone know what I need to do to fix this?

make sure you have the SENDER and DOMAIN set as an environment variable --


-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
Gator Communications                              uucp: ..!uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: evan@telly.on.ca (Evan Leibovitch)
Subject: Re: Recommendations wanted on PC Unix system purchase
Organization: Somewhere just far enough out of Toronto
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 13:13:06 GMT

In article <sheldon.713205555@pv141b.vincent.iastate.edu>
	sheldon@iastate.edu (Steve Sheldon) writes:

> We've looked into several solutions, and we've come up with two
>alternatives.
>
> #1:
> Purchase machine and Unix from Dell.
> 486D33 w/8 Megs of RAM
> 320 Meg SCSI harddrive
> NEC 5FG 17" color monitor
> Ethernet card
> Dell Unix

> #2:
> Purchase machine from Gateway
> And instead buy SCO Unix
> similar hardware configuration only a Nanao F550i monitor instead of
>the NEC 5FG.
>
> This would appear to cost roughly the same amount.

How about #3?

Machine from Gateway. OS from ESIX.
You get an OS way cheaper than SCO (street price for ESIX is below Dell),
the added features of R4, and the freedom to choose your own *supported*
hardware from an assortment of vendors.

> I just want to collect some comments on either of these alternatives.
>From what I've read here, Dell provides a good product, and we're
>leaning towards that right now, but we'd also like good support
>and something that's going to be around for a few years.

ESIX support is no-charge and helpful. If you're smart and/or lucky you
can get ESIX from a VAR who is familiar with the specific applications you
want to run, and can provide more localized/specialized help.

> I'm not certain what video card Dell uses.  Perhaps it's built into
>the motherboard?  Gateway uses the ATI Ultra.

ESIX's X supports the ATI cards, TIGA, ET4000 and ET3000, and Everex
Viewpoint. It also supports super-cheap X on a hercules monchrome card.

> We'll likely be running X at some time, and want good performance with
>that.  Is there any potential problem with either of these systems?

With ESIX you can save more money by buying it without its GUIs, and
getting either the free implementation of X11R5, or the commercial ones
offered by a number of third-party vendors. Going this route, the choice
of video gets broader still.

>Remembering that we still want to maintain compatibility with VGA to use our
>program.

Dell, SCO, ESIX and others provide standard VGA support under X, but I
don't know of anyone who'll recommend using it.

> Is 8 Megs enough RAM?

Not if you're putting in X.

-- 
 Evan Leibovitch, Sound Software Ltd., located in beautiful Brampton, Ontario
         evan@telly.on.ca / uunet!utzoo!telly!evan / (416) 452-0504
    Was "Trouble" (from the Broadway Show, Music Man) the first rap song?
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: bruno@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu (Bruno Hall)
Subject: Re: DELL: where g++ headers and libs?
Organization: McGill Research Centre for Intelligent Machines
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 92 22:45:09 GMT

melchers@Chico.Chemie.FU-Berlin.DE (Bernd Melchers) writes:
>I just compiled gcc and g++ (2.2.2) without any problems on our
>Dell Unix SVR4 I2.1 system. But to use g++ , i need the headerfiles
>(iostream.h,...). Where can i get them? Does i also need a special
>c++ library or can i use the c-libraries coming with dell?

I think what you're looking for is libg++-2.2.tar.Z, which should be
available wherever you got everything else.

Incidentally, was was the transient disk space during compilation?

Bruno
-- 
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Bruno Hall  |  VE2HUM  |  bruno@mcrcim.mcgill.edu         
McGill Research Centre for Intelligent Machines - Controls Group
New systems generate new problems -- Join the Flat Earth Society.
From: pcg@aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Recommendations wanted on PC Unix system purchase
Date: 16 Aug 92 18:54:55 GMT
Reply-To: pcg@aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi)
Organization: Prifysgol Cymru, Aberystwyth

On 16 Aug 92 02:13:49 GMT, pjh@mccc.edu (P. J. Holsberg) said:

pjh> Piercarlo Grandi (pcg@aber.ac.uk) wrote: If you think that Dell's

pcg> DAT drive is too expensive, get one from APS (alliance peripherals
pcg> systems); it costs about $1400.  The APS DAT is portable; you can
pcg> actually carry it from machine to machine, it is very small and
pcg> light.

pjh> Does it work off a serial or parallel port, or do you have to open
pjh> up each machine and attach it to the SCSI controller?

Neither :-). It's a SCSI device, and all Nice and Fine SCSI controllers
have a SCSI socket on the back, so you can attach both external and
internal devices to the same SCSI bus.

By default, even when there are no external devices plugged in, I keep
that end of the bus externally terminated, so I can always unplug the
exterminal terminator and plug in an external device.

And yes, if you are *careful* you can even do this without powering down
the machine (but I explicitly disclaim any and all consequences of
taking such a risk).
--
Piercarlo Grandi                   | JNET: pcg@uk.ac.aber
Dept of CS, University of Wales    | UUCP: ...!mcsun!ukc!aber-cs!pcg
Penglais, Aberystwyth SY23 3BZ, UK | INET: pcg@aber.ac.uk
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us (Dave Ihnat)
Subject: Re: SAS 2.0
Summary: Any rough guesstimates?
Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 05:26:39 GMT

In article <1992Aug12.155910.8528@Unibase.SK.CA> roe@Unibase.SK.CA (Roe
Peterson) writes:
>Apologies to the net at large for the long delay, and thanks for your
>patience.  SASS 2.0 has been delayed for a number of reasons:

Your work is most appreciated; especially after the CLOUT project, I *know*
how volunteer efforts can chew up your expendable time...  But in any case,
do you have any rough guesstimates on when it might be rolling out the door?
Oh, BTW, will the VP/IX support extend to MERGE as well?

Again, thanks for doing something that keeps me from having to do it (and
lose yet more sleep...)

		Dave Ihnat
		ignatz@homebru.chi.il.us (preferred return address)
		ignatz@chinet.chi.il.us
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: fharvell@ocelot.UUCP (F Harvell)
Subject: Re: Ethernet Cards -- Questions
Organization: FTS International, Orlando, FL, USA
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 00:01:31 GMT

In article <18338@polstra.UUCP> jdp@polstra.UUCP (John Polstra) writes:
>I'm putting together some hardware that is going to run Esix Unix, and I
>have some questions about Ethernet controllers.  According to Esix, the
>following cards (among others) are supported:
>
>    3COM 3C503
>    3COM 3C507
>    Western Digital / SMC 8003
>    Western Digital / SMC 8013
>
>1. Which of the above are 16-bit cards?

	The 3C503 is an 8 bit card but the 3C503/16 is 16 bit and cheaper.
I have used the 3C503 cards and now own several of the 3C503/16 cards and
use them in several machines under ISC and PC/TCP.  They are great cards
and come with a lifetime warranty.

>3. Any advice about which Ethernet card to choose for best performance?

	I am not sure about the performance issues (I believe the sofware
driving the cards influences the performance more than the hardware).  I
do know that 3Com promotes their cards as extremely fast, i.e. the 3C503/16
as being faster than other's 32bit EISA cards.


(Disclamer:  Not associated with 3Com, just a satisfied customer.)

-- 
And therefore, never send to know for whom the | Mr. F Harvell  407 645-4670
bell tolls, it tolls for thee.  -- John Donne  | FTS International
-----------------------------------------------| 1935 Albert Lee Parkway
fharvell@ocelot.oau.org | fharvell@ocelot.uucp | Winter Park, FL  32789-1809
Xref: sparky comp.unix.sysv386:13261 comp.unix.bsd:4288
From: yeh@cs.purdue.EDU (Wei Jen Yeh)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.bsd
Subject: swap allocation strategies
Keywords: swap
Date: 17 Aug 92 18:59:37 GMT
Followup-To: comp.unix.sysv386
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University

Hello,
  I've read discussions on the net about deciding appropriate swap size
for normal systems.  However, I've not seen discussions concerning other
issues like where the main swap region should reside, or a large swap vs.
several medium ones.  The system I'm running is often under heavy load.
It currently has 32mb main mem and a main swap (/dev/swap) of size 64mb.
There are times that I need to add an extra swap (file) to the system.
The questions below thus come up:
  1.  Should I allocate another 64mb of swap region or two 32mb ones?
  2.  Where should they go? to the boot drive or the secondary drive?
  3.  Should I allocate a slice for the swap or use a swap file instead?
  4.  Should I reinstall the system and start w/ a single 128 mb of main swap?
      (if it's better to have a single swap region.), or four slices of
      size 32mb?

Any suggestions?

If it matters, I'm running Dell's sVr4 Issue 2.1.  Thanks.

Wei Jen Yeh                      yeh@cs.purdue.edu
                                 Department of Computer Science
                                 Purdue University
                                 West Lafayette, Indiana
From: mike@rs1.tcs.tulane.edu (michael pilman)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Help compiling Gopher server on AT&T UNIX sysV386
Date: 22 Aug 92 18:03:28 GMT
Organization: Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
Nntp-Posting-Host-[nntpd-1624]: rs1.tcs.tulane.edu

I am interested in hearing from anyone who has compiled a 
gopher server on a machine with the following configuration
or one similar.

386 AT&T UNIX sysV386 r3.2.3 w/ ANSI C SysV from AT&T.

Any input would be appreciated.  Please E-mail to me as I 
am cross posting and may not get back to this group soon.

Mike Pilman                       |  mike@rs1.tcs.tulane.edu
Facilities Administrator          |
Computing Services                |
Tulane University                 |
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: tschia@exodus.reuters.com.sg (tschia)
Subject: tar command on SCO rel 3.2
Organization: Reuters Singapore
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 08:30:23 GMT


Hi everybody,
		it seem that the tar command does not support the -uf
on /dev/rfd096ds15 or /dev/rfd1135ds18 and also if the data is larger
than 1 disk space it cannot be carry forward to another disk. Any advise
?
Please HELP
A thousand thank you

TS Chia
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386