HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jamie@gaul.csd.uwo.ca (James Blustein)
Subject: Re: readable deTeX
Organization: Computer Science Dept., Univ. of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 01:13:38 GMT

In article <185recINNjqg@moe.ksu.ksu.edu> khcnn@eece.ksu.edu
(newsreader) wrote:
>wilcox@cmns.think.com writes:
>>                         I tried using GNU's deTeX, but this does *no*
>>formatting at all, so the output is not very readable. Is there any code
>>(TeX, LISP, or otherwise) for transforming TeX documents into flat (but
>>somewhat readable) ASCII, suitable for an on-line manual?
>
>Try "dvidoc" or "dvitype".

Or dvi2tty.
-- 
James Blustein                                        `Did you say "knives"?'
<jamie@uwo.ca>                                        `*Rotating* knives, yes.'
From: mis@aps.org (mis liaison)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: ANSWER: vf previewer (?)
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 10:58:55 EDT
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List


Thanks to those who answered my question about vf previewers.

The answer . . . emTeX's dviscr handles vf's.

Also, a program called dvicopy (not part of emTeX) can turn a dvi file
that uses vf's into a "normal" dvi file.


CHamlin, mis@aps.org
From: gambhir@cs.cornell.edu (Navindra S Gambhir)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: reserving registers from within macros
Keywords: \new..., register, reserve, macro, definition, forbidden control seq.
Date: 2 Sep 92 04:05:17 GMT
Organization: Cornell University,  Ithaca  NY 14853

In article <repasky.715398745@sun.bdc.ubc.ca> repasky@bdc.ubc.ca (Dick Repasky) writes:
> I've made the following attempt:
> 
>     \def\doit#1{\expandafter\newinsert\csname big#1\endcsname}
> 
> and I receive the error that \newinsert is a forbidden command sequence in
> a macro definition.  Does anyone have advice?
> 

The problem arises because all the \new... macros (\newcount, \newdimen,
..., \newinsert, etc.) are defined as \outer in plain TeX, and so are
``not allowed to appear in any place where tokens are being absorbed at
high speed.''  An \outer macro cannot appear in the replacement text of
a definition, among other places (The TeXbook, p.206).

I do not know why this decision (i.e., to have all allocations to be
global) was made; it sure is a nuisance to have to first name all the
``variables'' (i.e., give a name to the registers) that you will ever
need, instead of have them ``declared'' when you actually need them.
(And since all allocations are \global, you also cannot get away with
temporary ``declarations'' inside \begingroup and \endgroup.)


> Note that this proceedure works wonderfully if I change it to generate macro 
> definitions on macros that have different names.  The problem arises
> when any \new"register" sequence is to be defined.
> 

Figures, because \def is different from \new<whatever>.


> My goal is to be able to allocate multiple insert lists and operate on them
> from a common macro.
> 

Short of redefining \new... to the exact same thing, but without the
\outer, I do not see any way out.  But this in not very desirable,
since ``the inside story of how allocation is actually performed should
not be relevant when the allocation macros are used at a higher level;
you mustn't assume that plain.tex really does allocation in any
particular way'' (The TeXbook, p.346).

Maybe the Wizards will soon followup.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Navindra S Gambhir                                   gambhir@cs.cornell.edu

I would rather write programs to help me write programs than write programs
From: Wolfgang Ratzka <wolfgang.ratzka@rphs1.physik.uni-regensburg.de>
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: RE: how to include postscript in emtex latex?
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 09:09:05 +0200
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

hank@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:

   Of course, one should add that Ghostscript will help here:
     TeX -> dvips -> ghostscript -> HP Laserjet, epson, others

   Using Ghostscript is, perhaps, not for the timid, but it does work.
   (...)

I agree, but at the moment it's only worth it, if you already have
PostScript fonts of acceptable quality.  Another method, that should
(maybe) use less printer memory in a Laserjet would be:

                GhostScript          emTeX
PostScript file ----------> PCX-file ----> HP Laserjet, epson, others
      ___
|    |   |
| /\ |  \
|/  \|	 \_______________________________________________ Wolfgang Ratzka

X400:	ratzka@rphs1.physik.uni-regensburg.dbp.de
	ratzka@vax1.rz.uni-regensburg.dbp.de
SMTP:	ratzka@rphs1.physik.uni-regensburg.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: emTeX and Windows 3.1
Date: 23 Aug 92 21:56:33 GMT
Organization: Auburn University, AL

In article <gyan.714267806@unixg.ubc.ca>, gyan@unixg.ubc.ca (Gyan P. Sinha) writes:
> The message means that emTeX (386) is not a DPMI compliant program, which
> is a convention about how memory hungry DOS programs get and manage the
> "unconventional" memory they need. Thus, Windows will not let it run in
> the DOS box. There are two solutions;
> (1) Run it in native DOS.
> (2) If you must have a fast 32-bit TeX in a multi-tasking envirornment,
>     run it under OS/2 in an OS/2 window. If I have got this right, the
>     same executable should run in an OS/2 window. If I goofed, I know
>     there is a 386 TeX for OS/2. Either way you are covered. Note that
>     you will not be able to run the program in the DOS box under OS/2
>     for the same reason, but that is irrelevant.
> 
> I'm afraid your simultaneous quest for multi-tasking and a fast, free
> TeX means you'll have to switch OS's. In my opinion its well worth it.

emTeX under OS/2 is the best solution, but there is the "TeXas TeX" 32-bit
tex for DOS at simtel20.army.mil in pd1:<msdos.tex> which claims to run
in a DOS box under windows. If I recall correctly, I could not get it to
work under windows (not enough mem?). If you are looking for a regular TeX,
use the emtex tex186 beta 5 under windows. If you need a bigtex, the texas
tex is probably faster than emTeX btex186 beta 8 (which also will run in 
a dos box under windows (but very slowly).

--darrel hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: werner@newton.physics.uq.oz.au (Werner michael)
Subject: \ovalfbox
Reply-To: werner@dirac.physics.uq.edu.au
Organization: Department of Physics, University of Queensland
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 07:52:36 GMT


-- 
Has anyone set up a facility (.sty file) to allow placing boxes
or even better nice rounded boxes around equation environments in
LaTeX where labels may appear inside.
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: gambhir@cs.cornell.edu (Navindra S Gambhir)
Subject: Re: DUAL HANDOUTS/PERSONAL NOTES MACRO IDEA
Organization: Cornell University,  Ithaca  NY 14853
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 01:31:30 GMT

In article <1992Sep2.154831.22839@athena.mit.edu> lasmith@athena.mit.edu (Lones A Smith) writes:
> 
> 
>      I am making class  notes. I would like on the same file to add my own comments that will NOT APPEAR on the notes. I do not want two separate files,
> for editing purposes.   Here's what I want: I want to prefix the additional
> comments for my expanded version of the notes by a symbol --- call it ** ---
> so that lines preceeded by ** are only printed out when a particular control sequence in the preamble is present.  That is,
> 
> [...]
> 
> Then when I LaTeX the first file, the ** should be ignored entirely, whereas when I LaTeX the second file ** should be read as %.  Brute force methods
> have failed me.  Any ideas, (La)TeXperts??????
> 

If you had only chosen a single character (e.g., @) instead of **,
this would have been rather simple:

Then if you have 
\catcode`\@=9
at the beginning of the file, @ would be ignored and
if you have
\catcode`\@=14
at the beginning of the file, @ would be the comment character.

(Or you could \def\privatenotes{\catcode`\@=9 }
and \def\classhandout{\catcode`\@=14 } in your macro file
as mnemonics for these commands.)

If you also want @ in the text somewhere, you can use \@ for that
by saying
\chardef\@=`\@

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Navindra S Gambhir                                   gambhir@cs.cornell.edu

I would rather write programs to help me write programs than write programs
From: barr@triples.Math.McGill.CA
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: verbatim
Date: 3 Sep 92 14:09:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: triples.9209031409.AA10730
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

There has been some discussion of \verb on ctt lately.  I would just
like to offer a suggestion that I have found useful.  Give the ascii
escape character the catcode 0 and then you can use control
sequences inside verbatim environments and you can also use it to
end the environment.  Of course, you cannot send such documents over
the net, but that is a useful device.

Michael Barr
From: anik@crhc.uiuc.edu (Sadun Anik)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: Fancy script fonts found in Mathematical journals
Date: 1 Sep 92 16:40:07
Organization: Center for Reliable and High-Performance Computing
NNTP-Posting-Host: lyra.crhc.uiuc.edu
In-reply-to: sdyck@ccu.umanitoba.ca's message of Tue, 1 Sep 1992 18:54:06 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.185406.27063@ccu.umanitoba.ca> sdyck@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Sheldon Dyck) writes:

   Does anyone know where I can locate the fancy script font found in many 
   mathematical journals such as the Bulletins of the American Mathematical 
   Society? I have looked through the pk directory in ymir.claremont.edu but
   with no luck. Any help would be very much appreciated. Thank you.


I am not quite clear on which fonts you talk about but my guess is 
the ones that come with AMS-LaTeX. If you get the AMS-LaTeX
distribution, you get the .tfm and .mf files for these fonts too
(including Cyrillic). You can generate all the pk files from these.
I am not clear how easy would it be to use these fonts without NFSS.
Since you are writing from a math department, installing AMS-LaTeX may
be very useful.

--
Sadun Anik, U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Center for Reliable and High-performance Computing
e-mail: anik@crhc.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: kdorma@ravana.eche.ualberta.ca (Kevin Dorma)
Subject: can't run emTeX386
Organization: Dept. of Chemical Engineering, University of Alberta
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 13:09:42 GMT

How's it goin', eh?
I can't get emTeX386 to run in OS/2.  When I try to compile a document I get
  [D:\emtex\texinput]tex386 ^&lplain sample
  This is emTeX (tex386), Version 3.141 [3c-beta8] (no format preloaded)
  **&lplain sample
  (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied)

Everytihing was installed using the defaults, except for a modified set-tex.cmd
file.  
Hardware: 486 with 4Mb Ram
What am I doing wrong?  TIA

                                  | 
Kevin Dorma                       | Hi, my Lyapunov exponent is 2.31.
kdorma@ravana.eche.ualberta.ca    | What's yours?
Ph.D. type of student             | 
Dept. of Chemical Engineering     | Don't look at my disclaimer, your's
University of Alberta             | is much more interesting.
Edmonton, Alberta                 | 
                                  |
From: yangze@acf3.NYU.EDU (Ze Yang, , , )
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Help Needed/Tex Fonts Installation
Date: 24 Aug 92 02:45:00 GMT
Organization: New York University

I made some fonts by using METAFONT, I got both the .pk file amd .tmf
file, I set the enviromental variable TEXFONTS, TEXPKS, TMFPATH, but
still the system cannot find my font. Do I have to put my files in
the default directory? I cannot do that because I am not the superuser.
Actually, my font only contains one picture
for my letterhead, is there an alterative way to do this?

Any information is aprecaited.

Thanks in advance.

Ze Yang
From: ecsgrt@luxor.latrobe.edu.au (Geoffrey Tobin)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: Definition of \tenrm
Date: 1 Sep 92 02:33:38 GMT
Organization: La Trobe University

(I suspect that my mail won't get through to Pierre's address, so I
post.)

The TeXbook indexes "\font", which is the current font.  At the
primitive level, fonts are manipulated using \font.

Defining \ninerm as a switch to the CM 9pt roman font:

    \font\ninerm=cmr9   % TeXbook, p 16

The current font is denoted by \font.  In the above context, both of
the following two lines expand to "cmr9":

    \fontname\font     % p 213
    \fontname\ninerm   % same paragraph

Equality of font control sequences can be tested.  Now, what I don't
know is whether that should be the simpler looking:

    \ifx\font\ninerm ... \else ... \fi    % p 210, top paragraph

OR (trying to read b/w Knuth's lines):

    \ifx\the\font\ninerm ... \else ... \fi    % p 214, last paragraph

If anyone reading this would like to write a textbook more clearly
than Knuth, may I suggest MORE EXAMPLES ?  Knuth tries to do too much
at once, as research-minded people often do, but this is no way to
teach.  Let's remember that teaching a new subject means that the
students are learning it for the FIRST time.

All the Best!
Geoffrey Tobin
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: mcastle@mcs213d.cs.umr.edu (Michael R Castle)
Subject: Re: moving DVI files from ASCII to EBCDIC
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 13:49:35 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla

In article <1992Aug27.233649.1@hmcvax.claremont.edu> dhosek@hmcvax.claremont.edu writes:
>When moving a DVI file to any system with a record-based file
>system (CMS, MVS, VMS, ???), you also need to worry about the
>padding of the final record of the file. Simply using FTP to
>transfer the file with F1024 records is not enough for a valid
>DVI file on CMS (although it is necessary). One must also make
>sure that the file is padded xDF (which is valid) instead of the
>x00's that are inserted by every file transfer protocol.
>
>-dh
>

This was definitely the problem.  I haven't looked into seeing if I can
change the pad character on ftp, but I can just pull the dvi file into the
editor and change thos padded x00 to xDF's.

Thanks!
mrc
From: eijkhout@cupid.cs.utk.edu (Victor Eijkhout)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: IBM Pennant Systems survey
Date: 1 Sep 92 02:30:07 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - Department of Computer Science
Distribution: world
Reply-To: eijkhout@cupid.cs.utk.edu (Victor Eijkhout)
NNTP-Posting-Host: cupid.cs.utk.edu

In article <1992Aug31.150725@bk-kgnaix11.aix.kingston.ibm.com>, mjones@bk-kgnaix11.aix.kingston.ibm.com (Mike Jones) writes:
|>   
|> > |> I urge people not to cooperate with this survey.
|> > 
|> > Hear hear. Anything to hinder IBM.
|> 
|> As for Mr. Eijkhout, I don't understand that attitude at all.

Must be the lack of smileys in my post. For which my apologies.
I cherish a prejudice against
IBM, which is partly justified (TSO, JCL, VM/CMS, the 6670 printer, MSDOS),
and partly not (RS6000! Yeah! Vroom!).

And I was ticked off by way the query and the response were formulated:
'please give us stuff, we are going to use it to become the best in
the field, and we are not going to tell you any more about it'.

|>There are
|>some of us inside IBM who not only use UNIX, but we read Usenet and even
|>use TeX!

Did you know that parts of the design of TeX were influenced by
the design (flaws :-) of IBM software?

|> We are occasionally crucified for ignoring the needs of the market,
|> then publicly abused for trying to investigate them.

Nope. It was the arrogant attitude in the survey and the reply to Karl.
If they would have told me what interesting purposes they had
for my sollicited files, I would gladly have contributed.

|>    Mike Jones  |  AIX/ESA Development  |  mjones@donald.aix.kingston.ibm.com

Victor.
From: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: Problems with "footnote"
Keywords: LaTeX maketitle footnote
Date: 26 Aug 92 13:57:02 GMT
Reply-To: cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson)
Distribution: comp.text.tex
Organization: U of Cambridge Computer Lab, UK

In article <1992Aug25.172152.18934@newton.ccs.tuns.ca>,
chenm@newton.ccs.tuns.ca (Ming chen) writes:
|> 
|> Can anyone tell me what's wrong with the following commands:
|> 
|> %===========================================================
|> 
|> \author{M. Chen\footnotemark[1] ~~and M. Comeau\footnotemark[2] }
|> 
|> \footnotetext[1]{ Dept. of Civil Engr.}
|> \footnotetext[2]{ Dept. of Appl. Math.}
|> 
|> %===========================================================
|> 
|> 
|> Instead of producing number "1" and "2" for the authors (M. Chen and 
|> M. Comeau), it gives special symbols such as "*" and "+" (\dag). 
|> 
|> The strang thing is that the numbers do get right for the bottom note.

\maketitle in the standard styles temporarily redefines \thefootnote to
be \fnsymbol{footnote}. The footnotes involved are expected to be generated
by \thanks rather than explicitly. I suppose that you could use \thanks for
the author's address, although this is clearly not what Lamport had in mind.
He would also want you to separate the authors' names with \and.

Chris Thompson
Cambridge University Computing Service
JANET:    cet1@uk.ac.cam.phx
Internet: cet1@phx.cam.ac.uk
From: arrigo@cube.sublink.org (Arrigo Benedetti)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Blue Sky's font info
Date: 1 Sep 92 09:26:01 GMT
Reply-To: arrigo@cube.sublink.org
Organization: Arrigo Benedetti

I've heard that a company called Blue Sky is selling Postscript fonts
that work with TeX. Is anyone using such fonts? Could anyone please
send me Blue Sky's address and phone number?
I know that this is probably a FAQ, but I've just started using LaTeX
on my NeXT, I'm a novice user.
BTW when is the FAQ posted to this group?

Of course I will summarize to the net if there is enough interest.

Thanks,

-Arrigo
-- 
Arrigo Benedetti             e-mail: arrigo@cube.sublink.org (preferred)
University of Bologna                benedett@deis01.cineca.it
undergraduate student (EECS)         
Via S. Agata, 11               Tel:  (home)   +39 59 224929
41100 Modena - Italy                 (office) +39 59 216688 (fax) +39 59 220727
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: asnd@reg.triumf.ca (Donald Arseneau)
Subject: Re: \font command
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: TRIUMF: Tri-University Meson Facility
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 11:02:00 GMT

In article <7959771@MVB.SAIC.COM>, "Daniel H. Luecking" <DL24794@UAFSYSB.UARK.EDU> writes...
>The following appeared in a posting to the net:
>  > \font\opt12=optima at 12pt
> 
> isn't this incorrect
>syntax? (According to the poster, no syntax error was reported.) The TeXbook
>defines font assignment as
> 
>     \font<control sequence><equals><font identifier>
>
Yes, but <equals> --> <optional spaces> | <optional spaces> =
so there is no syntax error. Instead \opt is given the font 
12=optima scaled to be 12pt.  Of course, 12=optima.tfm cannot
be found, so there is an error message.

The original poster typed the error message incorrectly.

Donald

Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: mcastle@mcs213d.cs.umr.edu (Michael R Castle)
Subject: moving DVI files from ASCII to EBCDIC
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 01:08:19 GMT
Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla

Our local IBM mainframe has a 3820 laster printer on it that can handle 
duplex printing.  The mainframe has TeX and dvi support for the 3820, but
I'd rather use the TeX system on our unix system.  My problem is moving the
dvi files from the ascii based unix system to the ebcdic based ibm mainframe.

I've done a little of of looking and asking around, but can't seem to find
anything that looks like it would be useful for making an easy transition
between the systems.

Has anyone else done any TeX work on an IBM mainframe running VM/CMS??  Any
suggestions on dealing with the transfers would be appreciated.

Mike Castle
From: ara@zurich.ai.mit.edu (Allan Adler)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: dvivga incompatible with ansi.sys
Date: 3 Sep 92 04:52:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: camelot.ARA.92Sep2235248
Distribution: comp
Organization: M.I.T. Artificial Intelligence Lab.


I have been using dvivga for some time on an 80386 MSDOS system. Recently,
I installed demacs and in order to get demacs to display the full screen,
I had to install ANSI.SYS in my config.sys file. All of a sudden, I found
that I could no longer use the numeric keypad or the arrow keys when
using dvivga. I looked around on my disk and found another file called
TANSI.SYS (Trident ANSI.SYS) and found that it worked with demacs and
also let me use the arrow keys and numeric keypad with dvivga.

Today I suddenly noticed that I could no longer use the numeric kepyad
and arrow keys with dvivga, even with TANSI.SYS. So I am in the position
of having to choose between DVIVGA and DEMACS. 

When I had the problem earlier, I found that it also happened with CDVI,
a previewer I found at wuarchive.wustl.edu. So I gather that it is some
kind of hardware problem.

If anyone has had similar experiences and knows what to do about it, please
let me know.

Allan Adler
ara@altdorf.ai.mit.edu
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: ecsgrt@luxor.latrobe.edu.au (Geoffrey Tobin)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: UKTeX Digest V92 #33
Summary: GhostVIEW.
Date: 28 Aug 92 08:18:17 GMT
Followup-To: gnu.ghostscript.bugs
Organization: La Trobe University

One article in UKTeX suggested "Ghostscript" for PS preview in X.
That should be "Ghostview" for preview.  Quite nice.
Ghostscript is primarily a PS -> other-format converter.
Followup to gnu.ghostscript.bugs.  :-)

Geoffrey Tobin
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
From: rolfl@karl.uio.no (Rolf Lindgren)
Subject: Re: dvips bug?
Organization: Institutt for Humanistisk Informatikk, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 06:22:03 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.215547.28236@m.cs.uiuc.edu> barbehen@milton.cs.uiuc.edu (Michael Barbehenn) writes:
   I have a postscript file which prints fine on our postscript
   printer.  I am trying to include this file into a LaTeX
   document as a figure.  I run dvips and try to print the new
   postscript file.
   The printer aborts printing the new file.

   (A little debugging has pinpointed the source of the ``error''
    on an apparent encoding of text that appears in the file as
    a large block of numbers and letters...possibly hexadecimal
    run together.  When I comment the block out, the lines of the
    figure are printed ok -- no text)

   So I am concluding that there is some negative interaction
   with dvips and my file.  Is it possible that the postscript
   file is a different `version' than what dvips assumes?

   Thanks for any comments,

If the postscript file prints fine on your printer then the file's not
well-behaved Encapsulated PostScript because it has a ``showpage'' command
at the end. (Unless you printer driver automatically adds ``showpage''...)

What's the make and model of you printer and computer, and which version
of dvips do you use?


--
       Rolf Lindgren           |       "The opinions expressed above are
       616 Bjerke Studentheim  |        not necessarily those of anyone"
       N-0589 OSLO 5           |           rolfl.lindgren@usit.uio.no
From: "Phillip E. Parker" <PPARKER@TWSUVM.UC.TWSU.EDU>
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: IBM Pennant Systems survey
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 15:12:38 CDT
Organization: Info-Tex<==>Comp.Text.Tex Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

The call "anything to hinder IBM" seems like the attitude of a barbarian,
technophobic machine-breaker. Did you mean that literally, or have I
misinterpreted?
(The original call not to cooperate may be misguided, but is at least
superficially more civilized.)

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%          Phillip E. Parker
%  __ 2    Math. Dept.                 Bitnet: pparker@twsuvm
% |__)     Wichita St. Univ.         Internet: pparker@twsuvm.uc.twsu.edu
% |        Wichita KS  67260-0033         Fax: 1-316-689-3748
%          USA