HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: smorris@venus.lerc.nasa.gov (Ron Morris )
Subject: I, Ron Morris, know nothing about football
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 16 Oct 1992 07:46 EDT  

I thought the Lions would be ready to play, but boy was I wrong
That was the most pathetic display I've seen in a while.  I've
seen more intensity at the Ballet.

By the way, those of you who've objected to me talking about
Viking woofers should take a look at my mailbox.  Sheesh.

Ron
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: psima01@convex.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (M. Maisack)
Subject: Joe Gibbs/ Redskins win SB XXIX
Organization: Comp. Center (ZDV) U of Tuebingen, FRG
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 12:57:16 GMT

Oct 1992: The Redskins lose against the Broncoes by virtue
          of a late drive by John E. and witha 2-3 record
          are virually out of this year's contention.
          they finish 7-9

Jan 1995 (+/- 1 year)
         Joe Gibbs and the Skins win SB 29(+/- 1) over Houston
         It is JG's 4th SB with his 4th QB.

Oct 1995: The Redskins lose..... (insert John Elway's grandson)...

why is it that coach Joe Gibbs can build SB teams in somehting
like 4 year intervals, but not a repeating team?
or is it Washingtonitis?

Michael

and where are salt and pepper once I get to eat those words? ;-)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: MCMASTER@LSTC2VM.stortek.com (Jim McMaster)
Subject: Re: Week 6 & cumulative passer ratings
Organization: StorageTek SW Engineering
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 23:02:44 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.201214.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu>
cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
 
>In article <ldlq30INNil3@cronkite>, andy@misha.Central.Sun.COM (Andy Knipp SE Andersen) writes:
>> In article 19390@ncar.ucar.edu, gary@colossus.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) writes:
>>> Week 6 (minimum 10 attempts):
>>> Pos Name              Atts  Comp   Cmp%  Yards  AvgGn  TDs TD %  INT  IN% RATE
>>> --- ----------------  ----  ----  -----  -----  -----  --- ----  --- ---- -----
>>>   1 Mike Tomczak        17    10   58.8    171  10.06    1  5.9    0  0.0 112.6
>>     ^ ^^^^ ^^^^^^^
>>
>> Arrgggghhh....  It must be the end of the world.  Are the cubs in the world
>> series ?  Is hell about to freeze over ?   Help.........
>>
>> ---
>> Andy Knipp                    |
>> Sun Microsystems              | The secret to success is sincerity,
>> Chicago Loop District         | once you can fake that,  you have it made.
>> andy@sunloop.central.sun.com  |
>>
>                        Every dog has his day
>
>                              -doug THE dolfan-
 
  OR...
        Even a blind pig finds an ear of corn sometimes
 
                               Jim McMaster
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: 1:1,000,000-Forced to pull for Raiders
Originator: delarocq@c00075-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 11:07:40 GMT


 



                           The Raiders have the Dolphins number.
> I cannot remember when the last time that the Dolphins beat the
> Raiders in regular season.  The Raiders are always tough on
> Monday night.  Hopefully, the Dolphins will do as you and look
> past the Raiders, then the Raiders will go to Maimi and crush
> the unexpecting Dolphans.
> 

 
For the first time, I am forced to go for the (gulp!) L.A. Raiders.
If it wasn't for the fact that:

1. Buffalo has lost it's past two games in it's inability to score within the 20
2. Miami is 5-0, and
3. Some stupid gutless idiot up in Buffalo coughs up so much garbage about the
   Dolphins it makes Joe Namath seem like an introvert.

So, I must go for that accursed team from L.A. to spoil Miami's party.

Thank goodness it only happens once every three years.

So, you Miami fans can brag all you want, and say that Buffalo chokes in the
Super Bowl, but all I have to say is one thing:

Marino has never won a Super Bowl, and Miami hasn't been good enough to get
there since.


BUFFALO BILLS FANS, UNITE!  MAY THE RAIDERS SQUISH THE FISH FOR ALL TO SEE!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Monday Night revenge-- Joe Robbie Stadium-- Buffalo vs. Miami



-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
   BBB   U  U  FFFF  FFFF  AAA   L   OOO     BBB    I  L     L   SSS     !
  B   B U  U  F     F     A  A  L   O   O   B   B  I  L     L   S   S   !
 BBBBB U  U  FFFF  FFFF  AAAA  L   O   O   BBBBB  I  L     L     SS    !
B   B U  U  F     F     A  A  L   O   O   B   B  I  L     L    S   S  
 BBB   UU  F     F     A  A  LLLL  OOO     BBB  I  LLLL  LLLL   SSS  !


Reporter: "Who do you think is the best running back in the NFL?"
Thurman Thomas: "The running back that went to Oklahoma State".
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: NFL_1992 Scoreboard: Week 6 Predictions and Results
Date: 13 Oct 92 06:07:11 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

Here are the computer program's Week 6 predictions and the results.
The computer picked 8 of 11 games correctly, which is good.
===



        
                     Week #6 Game Predictions


       Seattle        __0   17          L.A. Rams      _10   10

     @ Dallas         _27   22        @ New Orleans    _13   23



       Phoenix        _21   19          Denver         __3   16

     @ N.Y. Giants    _31   26        @ Washington     _34   25



       Houston        _38   31          Pittsburgh     _17   20

     @ Cincinnati     _24   18        @ Cleveland      __9   16



       N.Y. Jets      __3   21          Philadelphia   _17   22

     @ Indianapolis   __6   15        @ Kansas City    _24   19



       Buffalo        __3   32          Atlanta        _17   26

     @ L.A. Raiders   _20   20        @ Miami          _21   28


       San Francisco  _24   34

     @ New England    _12   10
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: AFC-Daydreams
Date: 8 Oct 92 17:10:36 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

In article <1992Oct7.212002.14570@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
> S.H. <NU138915@NDSUVM1.BITNET> writes:
>>[The Eagles are more impressive than any AFC team.]
>>No offence, I just
>>cannot see a single AFC team having the credentials.
> "Credentials"?  What the fuck are you talking about?  What kind of
> "credentials" do you want?  A letter from the president?  The Eagles
> don't have any "credentials", either.  They just have a 4-0 start
> in the regular season.  Impressive, but they're no lock to win
> anything yet, not even their division.

Does anyone recall the New York Jets of 1986?  They got off to a torrid
start, something like 10-1.  The offense and defense looked like
world-beaters.  Ken O'Brien's time had come.

Then they lost their last 5 regular season games, lost the division
title, and were eliminated in the 2nd round of the playoffs.  

And this was against the relatively uncompetitive AFC!  One could easily
see the Eagles doing a similar late-season freefall against Dallas,
Washington, and other tough NFC teams.

Not suggesting that they _will_, but be wary.  A lot can change between now
and December.
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Eric Sybesma)
Subject: Vikings Prediction through 1992
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 20:39:39 GMT

Well, I thought I would jump on the predictions bandwagon and
forecast the remainder of the Minnesota Vikings' games.

        Oct 15 DETROIT      Thursday night game
The Lions will come out full steam, wanting to prove that they still
can compete with the division leader.  They will jump up 7-0, and
then their weak offensive line will get tired.  Vikings lead at
the half and never look back.  Vikings by 13 (23-7) 

        Oct 25 WASHINGTON
It's a home game, so I wouldn't expect the Vikings to roll over and
die.  (Remember the 30-0 Viking triumph in the pre-season).  However,
the Vikings have to lose SOMETIME, and Lohmiller will be the difference.
Redskins by 2. (23-21)

        Nov  2 AT Chicago   Monday Night Game
Vikings will need to re-bound after the win.  I would love to see them
win this one, but Ditka and Harbaugh want the revenge too much.  Bears
by 1.  (Ouch, I hate to say that.)  (21-20)

        Nov  8 AT Tampa Bay
Bucs are losing steam in a hurry.  The new coach will take his team
to 7-9, but will not beat the better Vikings squad.  Vikings by 10 (31-21)

        Nov 15 HOUSTON
Vikings are up for the challenge.  Gannon is on a hot streak. Vikes by 13
(35-22)

        Nov 22 CLEVELAND
No contest.  Vikings will rule AFC Central this year.  Vikes by 23 (33-10)

        Nov 29 AT LA Rams
Vikes have a superior offense and defense. Close road game. Vikes by 5 (22-17)

        Dec  6 AT Philadelphia
Time to lose again.  I think the Vikings can win, but won't.  Eagles by 7 
(28-21)

        Dec 13 SAN FRANCISCO
Vikes always play S.F. tough in the Metrodome (to my recollection)
Vikings by 4 (28-24).  Anthony Carter has a great game!! :-)

        Dec 20 AT Pittsburgh
Another AFC Central team.  Vikes by 14.  (24-10)

        Dec 27 GREEN BAY
Season finally for a home game in the playoffs.  Vikes by 10 (34-24)

End Regular Season at 12-4.. home game in the Metrodome vs. Dallas
Cowboys.  Vikings win by 10.
On the road vs. Philadelphia.  Vikings get revenge. Vikes by 4.
Redskins make it to the championship (trust me) and beat the
Vikes by 3.  
End Season 14-5.  Redskins repeat as SuperBowl Champs.

This is just an opinion.  
-- 
Eric Sybesma
University of Michigan
sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu
sybesma@maize.engin.umich.edu
From: tes0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (THOMAS EDWIN SCHMIDLIN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Browns News - 1st qtr review - Steeler preview
Date: 13 Oct 92 02:20:27 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1992Oct12.131536.8656@cbnews.cb.att.com>, cfh@cbnews.cb.att.com (chu
ck.himmelspach) writes:
>In article <1992Oct10.173944.44252@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, tes0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (
>The Dave and Tom show is missing something....I'm not sure if it's Moe or
>Larry or Curly BUT you guys don't know shit about football. I hope you
>both do better in school OR your job(s) of flipping burgers at McDonald's.
>
>The Steelers didn't do much chewing unless you count eating crow. And the only
>shitting they did was when the Browns knocked it out of them.
>
>Have a Nice Day and Goooo Browns,
>
>Der Himmel
>

Oh, The Heavens, don't you mean Der Gott?  After all, only God would pick
every game right, every Sunday, every year.  Just because I choose my team to
win, and they didn't, doesn't mean I "Don't know shit about football."  FOAD.
-- 


Tom Schmidlin       DEEP THOUGHTS: By Jack Handey - If God dwells inside
TES0@LEHIGH.EDU         us, like some people say, I sure hope he likes
215-758-0875            enchiladas, cause that's what he's getting.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand)
Subject: Re: Eagles : YIKES!
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 06:26:51 GMT

jg> John P. Gloria

  [To Ed Lor]

jg> The more you "talk" the more obvious it becomes that you have no sense or
    understanding of the game of football.

  That's a rich one! Ed is one of the more knowledgable posters to r.s.f.p,
  but since you haven't been around very long, I don't expect you to know
  that. Of course, that hasn't kept you from sticking your keyboard deep
  into your........(I'll be nice) mouth.

jg> Football is based on tradition of winning and the good organizations have
    a way of retaining this winning attitude. The Eagles have yet to sustain
    any winning traditions that have culminated in championships and SB wins.

  BFD. A "winning tradition" isn't the least bit necessary to win an SB. All
  it takes is some good play and decent luck, and help from the NFL playoff
  system. Sure, the better teams *usually* make it, but some not-so-good
  ones have as well.

jg> ...[J]ust take a look of the traditions of the five former SB winners. 

  Which five? The 5 most recent ones? 2 for the Redskins, 2 for the 49ers,
  and 1 for the Giants. 

jg> Do you see a commonality there? Clue: tradition! It takes a winner to be
    a winner. The Eagles are not yet winners of anything except 4 games, get
    a clue.

  Gee, they've won only 1/4 of all their games, in convincing fashion, and
  yet you say it means nothing. What a maroon!

--
Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 1992 14:31:19 -0400 
From: Christopher Glenn Huegle <ch44+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Eric Green again

The U.S.A. Today list Eric Green (along with Tunch Ilkin) as questionable.
This of course probably means he will play and it's just a ploy to get the 
Browns to not prepare completely for him.   Hope it works.
He has been practicing all this week, but no news about him has gotten
out  to  the area since the Pittsburgh papers just happen to be on
strike.  


Chris

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From:  ()
Subject: Re: Wild cards
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Rice University
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 16:56:16 GMT

In article <Bw3KHM.Ix8@mail.boi.hp.com>, keithg@boi.hp.com (Keith Glasson)
wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 	What do the netfans think of wild card teams? For 'em?
> 	Do these 8-8 and 9-7 teams deserve to go to the playoffs?
> 	Since we're stuck with them-all that t.v. revenue-wouldn't
> 	it be more reasonable to hand them out based solely on
> 	won/loss records, with no regard to conference?
> 
     Awarding wild card berths purely by record is a little unfair to the
teams in a tougher conference, who may have played a harder schedule.
From: jcollins@sparkle.tnis (Jon Collins CT/90)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Allen Pinkett
Date: 8 Oct 92 15:25:29 GMT
Reply-To: jcollins@sparkle.tnis
Organization: Sun Microsystems


In article 8798@cbnewsh.cb.att.com, stan@vax135.att.com (Stan Ciesielski) writes:
>What is the status of Allen Pinkett?


Last I heard, out for the year!  Pinkett has nothing but bad luck!

Jon Collins @ JCOLLINS.GMR.COM
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Were the Lions overrated?
Date: 16 Oct 92 20:42:42 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Madison

This is one question I've had for years.  Yes, they did well last year at
times, but mainly by beating opponents that they should have, and by
playing in a conference which definitely had a down year.  When they went
up against the heavyweights, more often than not it ended up in a beating.

Before this year, they were supposed to great things, and I thought to
myself (well, I mentioned it to some friends) that last year was an
anomaly, that they had people playing way above their ability, and that
they were due for a fall.  Well, I'm not sitting around saying "I told you
so"; I want to know why I ended up right.

Nobody can dispute Sanders's abilities, but what other talent do they have
on offense?  The "Run-n-Shoot" or whatever you call it caught some teams by
surprise, but they don't do that anymore.  Ball is great on defense, but
who else do they have?  Spielman is a ferocious player, but he is very
small.

So, could some Lions fan or any person knowledgable of the Lions tell me
why they seemed to have collapsed?  Do they have key people hurt?  Are they
just playing like crap (which is what Fontes says)?  Or, was I right and
they were just playing above their heads?
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jason@cray.com (Jason Parker)
Subject: Philadelphia Eagles wk5
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 14 Oct 92 14:33:27 CDT

(posted on behalf of Terry Kent - kenttj@cnsvax.uwec.edu)

Philadelphia Eagles Stats Week 5

Philadelphia Eagles (4-0)
Next game:  at Kansas City

Game Summary

          Dallas   Philadelphia*
Pts          7          31
Rushing    22-80      36-160
Pass Att  19-38-3    11-19-1
Pass Yds    231         106
Fum Lost     1          0

PASSING
Cunningham  11-19-1-124

RUSHING
Walker      19-86 TT
Cunningham   7-43 T
Byars        8-25 T
Sherman      2-6

RECIEVING
Barnett      5-76
Walker       3-14
Byars        1-14
Williams     1-13
Beach        1-7

KICKING
Ruzek    F (40) 4X

SUMMARY
With timely turnovers and a dominating running attack,
Philadelphia easily won this much-heralded game.

Source:  Eau Claire Leader Telegram


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullivan)
Subject: Re: Will SF win the division?
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 09:35:40 GMT

In article <1ateggINNser@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>,
david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright) writes:
>
>Will SF win the divison?
>
>Here is the SF schedule:
>
>        SF @ NYG     SF
>        Buf @ SF     BUF
>        SF @ NYJ     SF
>        SF @ NO      SF
>         Rams @ SF    SF
>        SF @ NE      W
>        Atl @ SF     W
>        Rams, SF     W
>        SF @ Phx     W
>        SF @ Atl     L
>        NO @ SF      L
>        SF @ Rams    W
>        Phil @ SF    L
>        Mia @ SF     ?
>        SF @ Minn    W
>        TB @ SF      W
>        Det @ SF     W
>
>The W's stand for fairly safe wins, the L's stand for fairly safe
>losses. Considering SF nearly lost to the Ram's, arguably one of the
>weakest teams in the NFC, and her secondary collapsed under the Saints
>(not the strongest of offenses), I would say that SF will loose to the
>Saints again, loose to the fired up Marino, and probably loose one of
>two to Atlanta. SF ends the season 11-5.

I think that the Niners will win all the rest of their games...BTW
I always predict that and have been usually wrong.  You are making a
good bet to say they will lose to the Saints at home.  That is quite
possible - the Saints better than any team in the league have the
confidence to beat them.  Other than that, any team in the league
CAN beat them, few will.  Yes, I will agree with you that they could
end up 11-5 but I see that as a worse case scenario (thru rose
colored glasses).  The Niners are more likely to lose in their
division than against Miami or Philly.
> >New Orleans, on the other hand, is:

sorry, going to lose the division to the 49ers in spite
of being even in head to head matchups, in spite of having more
deserving and loyal fans than the niners.

I try to state this without ragging on your Saints.  I thoroughly
enjoy the divisional games the Niners play, though they don't own
them by a long shot.  If anything, they own the rest of the league
and would be second best if any of the Saints, Falcons, Rams could
beat the rest of the league also.

Mike
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: FINALS - EARLY GAMES
Date: 11 Oct 92 20:59:09 GMT
Organization: Pacific * Bell


Atlanta  17	   	Miami  21 * FINAL  
Philadelphia 17	Kansas City 24 * FINAL - The Eagles crash landed
Phoenix  21		   NY Giants  31 * FINAL 
San Francisco  24	New England  12 * FINAL - sloppy win, but it counts
Pittsburgh  9     Cleveland   17 * FINAL
Seattle  0	      Dallas  27 * FINAL           

Current games in progress:

Raiders  14  Bills  3  2nd qtr
Houston 10   Cincinnati 0

-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  Let us be thankful for the fools; but for them the rest
  of us could not succeed.  -   Mark Twain
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: august@hlpdsk.jsc.nasa.gov (Ray August)
Subject: Re: Give Cowboys a 'lil credit
Organization: nasa-jsc
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 15:40:06 GMT


jblixt@neon.cdc.com (jon blixt) writes:
: Sorry to break your heart Rayster, but the Cowboys and Eagles
: won't play in the Superbowl because the CAN'T.  They're both
: in the NFC.
: 


No Jon, look at my .sig; I'm an Oilers fan.


--

The rayster             ** Go Oilers
                        ** Go Braves
                        ** Bulls in 93

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mhopper@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Mark Hopper)
Subject: Re: Packers starting QB - Majik or Favre
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 16:10:16 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.125642.28411@cbfsb.cb.att.com> tkelsey@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (todd.p.kelsey) writes:
>In article <1992Oct12.204559.27576@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>>We've discussed a little who will be the starting QB for the Pack 
>>against Cleveland.  I mostly approached it in terms of saying what I 
>>thought Holmgren would do.  But I think if I was the coach I'd start 
>>Majik against Cleveland.  My reasoning is that I'd want to find out if 
>>the team is 2-1 since Majik got hurt is because Favre is the better QB 
>>or because the team is playing better now.
>>
>
>If I were coaching the Packers I would continue with Favre as the
>starting quarterback.  He has shown the confidence and arm strength
>that Majkowski has not this year.  Favre is playing with much the
>same confidence that Majkowski played with in 1989 and the rest of
>the players are responding to it.  I don't think it's a coincidence
>that the Packers play has improved since Favre has been the starter.
>
>Holmgren has already said that he "doesn't necessarily believe that
>a starter does not lose his job due to injury".  I believe he will
>also stick with Favre.  Holmgren's left little doubt that Favre is 
>his quarterback of the future and Favre is already doing more with
>the offense than Majkowski.
>
>
>-Todd

  If it ain't broken, don't fix it.  Farve has done an excellent job
  at QB since Majik's injury.  I always thought that Majik was a good
  QB but lately his confidence has been shaky.  Until Farve proves that
  he is not capable of guiding the team I think he has earned the start.
  Majik surely is feeling pressure and wants to prove he's worth what 
  the Packers are paying him.  Tough decision, but I'd go with Farve.

  MH  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chill@cbnews.cb.att.com (daniel.a.miller)
Subject: Re: Bermanisms
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 11:10:34 GMT

In article <4599@equinox.unr.edu> schnell@pyramid.unr.edu ( Dan Schnell ) writes:
>In article <1992Sep30.220610.25895@nntpserver.chevron.com> hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde) writes:
>>
>>Updated list of the Bermanator's classics:
>>
>>   Reggie "Foghorn" Langhorne
>
>Berman has one that I don't understand. 

	Oh come on now! Haven't you watched your Saturday Morning Cartoons? 
Foghorn Leghorn, is that BIG Chicken with is Dog sidekick on Looney Toons
Cartoon Shows! Tha-Tha-Tha-Tha Thats All Folks!

- Dan


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro