From: pnr0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (PAUL N. RITTER)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: I WAS RIGHT!!! YOU ARE CLUELESS!!!!
Date: 17 Dec 92 08:14:31 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <farenebt.724521807@craft.camp.clarkson.edu>, farenebt@craft.camp.cla
rkson.edu (Droopy) writes:
>pnr0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (PAUL N. RITTER) writes:
>
>>In article <farenebt.724432680@craft.camp.clarkson.edu>, farenebt@craft.camp.c
la
>>rkson.edu (Droopy) writes:
>>>pnr0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (PAUL N. RITTER) writes:
>>>
>>>>Well people, you have all proven to me that I WAS RIGHT!!! From the last two
>>>>postings I've made, NONE OF YOU could come up with ANY recourse except for t
he
>>>>fact that my grammmmmmmmer isn't by best feature. If all you can do is rip m
e
>>>>for some technical misconfiguration of words, don't bother me. After all,
>>>>LIBERALS use this type of tactic when they are proven WRONG (as opposed to
>>>>admitting that you were WRONG)! THANK YOU, LEFTISTS! You prove ONCE AGAIN th
at
>>>>Rush is the current leader in the mad race of providing POLITICALLY
>>>>CORRECTNESS and defining people to their actions.
>>>
>>>Absolutely. It is us, immoral, feminazi, tax and spend, commie loving,
>>>anti-family values, eco freak, god-hating, baby killing,
>>>loony left liberals who engage in
>>>name calling...but we all know that the innocent conservatives would NEVER
>>>do anything like that...
>
>>   I'm so glad that you agree that you are immoral, feminazi, tax and spend,..
.
>>   It's YOUR fault that this country is screwed up, not the conservatives in
>>   the nation.
>
>I could say something logical like, "Of course it's the Democrats' fault...
>AND the Republicans fault and the non-voters fault..." or that the real
>problem is Dems and GOP's pointing fingers of blame instead of trying to
>find solutions but I wouldnt want to confuse you with common sense or logic.

>
>>   People like you who say that it's o.k. to kill an unborn
>>   infant, that it's unconstitutional to make prisoners work hard labor,
>
>Gee, you can't read well can you. I know in order to understand my .sig,
>a comprehension of the English language is necesary but perhaps you could
>a 5 year old to read it to you...especially that, "pro-life" part in there.
>
>>>BRI FARENELL                           Hate is not a family value.
>>                                           THAT'S RIGHT! Too bad the LIBERALS
>>                                           and Democrats have a different
>>                                           meaning for the phrase.(like
>>                                           Senator Kennedy, M. Barry, etc.)
>
>Ugh, what a value. I mean, how you can expect the liberals to run the
>country if they actually respect the rights of ALL 250 million people
>not just those who agree with them. Damn those liberals.
>
>It's a good thing we have Republicans like Bob Packwood showing us the way.
>
   Gee, I'm sorry you feel that way. I should have pointed out that the ratio
   of the morons elected are 1 Rep  to  8 Domo. I hardly felt the need to
   distinguish this,  but for you....


>>>A pro-life, PC-hating, liberal card-carrying member of the ACLU
>============================================================================
>BRI FARENELL                           Hate is not a family value.
>FARENEBT@CRAFT.CAMP.CLARKSON.EDU       Get involved (or shut up)
>CLARKSON '95
>A pro-life, PC-hating, liberal card-carrying member of the ACLU
>===========================================================================
>"Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse
> to see it tried on him personally."   ---Abraham Lincoln
>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc