From: mst4298@rigel.tamu.edu (Mitchell S Todd)
Subject: Re: Teen Agent, Can you Hear Me? Teen Agent, Can You See Me? (was: Clay Shaw is Clay Bertrand, Oswald *was* a Teen Agent
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 21:18:00 GMT

(Roy Andrew Crabtree) writes...
>In article <28AUG199215043993@rigel.tamu.edu> mst4298@rigel.tamu.edu (Mitchell S Todd) writes:
>> ....
>>	How many Marine's medical records have you inspected, Bruce?

>	Oh, god, TailHook, and now you suggest that the average Marine
>	commonly gets VD "in the line of duty" ...

	For the record, I never said that Oswald got VD directly in
	the line of duty. That's Bruce and Dave's work. I said that
	the LoD tag could have easily been added as a small favor to
 	Oswald, or for some procedural reason (the latter seems likelier
	and likelier as I look into the matter more).

	The point in question is whether the "line of duty" tag is
	as anomalous as Bruce, Dave, and their host claim. I've
	not posted the most probable reason for the LoD tag, because
	Bruce is going to say that I'm lying again, rather than
	any substantiative refutation, and I'm getting tired of that.
	However, I note that someone else has posted it for me.


>	A real balanced argument there ...

	What is a balanced argument? As I'e noted, Bruce and Dave are
	the two people who claim that Oswald's medical record is 
	exceptional, and can only be taken as evidence that Oswald
	was a spy. They have noted the "VD in the line of duty" note
	in the medical record; however, they have been entirely
	unwilling and/or unable to show that this was an anomaly.


	
>>    		                \ | /	 
>>                               \|/
>>_________________________   ---(0)---   ______________________________________
>>\__                      \___/~/|\~\___/                              _______/
>>  \__ mst4298@zeus.tamu.edu / / | \ \\ 	      Ambiguity is the      ______////
>>    \__ Mitchell S Todd    /    |    \\   Devil's tetherball     ______////
>>      \___________________/           \\____________________________////
>>         \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/_____________\\\///////////////////////////
>>                           /////\\\\\\\\\\\    


>	And your wings are unbalanced, too.  You probably fly like
>	your reason, like your wings look:  shorttucked, onside, and
>	spiralling!


	I haven't flown in a long time. Suffice to say that I did it
	well.
	
	The .sig is not meant to be symmetrical. Partly, this is so I 
	can maximize the amount of space where the fancy saying
	goes, but mostly it's a compositional consideration. 
	A totally symmetrical pair of wings would look static
	and boring, not a bit unlike you.


                                |  
		              \ | /	 
                               \|/
_________________________   ---(0)---   ______________________________________
\__                      \___/~/|\~\___/                              _______/
  \__ mst4298@zeus.tamu.edu / / | \ \\ 	      Ambiguity is the      ______////
    \__ Mitchell S Todd    /    |    \\   Devil's tetherball     ______////
      \___________________/           \\____________________________////
         \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/_____________\\\///////////////////////////
                           /////\\\\\\\\\\\