HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v050lt62@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (SAINT)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Agassi racquet
Date: 25 Jan 93 21:34:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


	Does anyone have any clue which racquet Andre currently uses? Is he 
still under the Donnay contract? I hear he prefered Princes, and even had one
marked Donnay for a match. I don't know of an update, as of Agassi's grueling
schedule as of late...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
                   \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
                                       \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
                  \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\  * \\\\\\\\\\       
                    \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ ***  \\\\\\\\
                                   \\\\\\\\ \\\\ *  /////////
                   \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ///////////////////
                     \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\   //////////////////
                              \\\\\\\\      /////////////
                    \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\          /////////
                      \\\\\\\\\\\\        

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: hlam@reef.cis.ufl.edu (Herman Lam)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Tennis near Frankfurt
Date: 21 Jan 93 16:05:53 GMT
Organization: Univ. of Florida EE Dept.

My wife and I are avid tennis players and will be in Darmstadt,
Germany (30 kilometers from Frankfurt) beginning in February 
1993 for about 5 to 6 months.  Being from Florida, we are 
spoiled in being able to play tennis year round.  To our German 
friends (or anyone knowledgeable about that area), what are the 
prospects of playing tennis in the Frankfurt area in the winter 
months?  Are there indoor facilities, etc.?  If so, are they 
affordable?  What about tennis in the spring time?  Are there 
tennis leagues, etc.?  Any information is appreciated.  My email 
address is:  hlam@reef.cis.ufl.edu

Thanks,
H. Lam

Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: farrell@coral.cs.jcu.edu.au (John Farrell)
Subject: Re: Results: Aussie Open Day 2 completed
Organization: James Cook University
Date: 21 Jan 93 23:41:41 GMT

In <1jl822INNho9@mojo.eng.umd.edu> clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles Lin) writes:
>In article <farrell.727572362@coral>, farrell@coral.cs.jcu.edu.au (John Farrell) writes:
>>  Fortunately the local paper has Day 2 results, and since I may be the only
>>person in the world who knows them, here are the rest.                  ^^^^
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>     What about the person who reported the score in the paper?

  If you read the paper you would have severe doubts... The Australian's
coverage of results is dreadful. (in Strine: up Shit Creek)

>     As far as the various upsets, I think we sometimes think that players
>go into tournaments 100% healthy, and when we hear of an upset, it doesn't
>occur to us that the player might be injured.

  Jenny Capriati certainly gave that impression when she damn nearly lost to
Florencia Labat last night. Labat was two points away from winning the match,
she may have even had a match point, but couldn't finish Jenny off. Jenny
played tough and managed to take the second set 7-5 after losing the first.
Labat's resistance seemed to crumble then.
  Afterwards, Stefan Edberg demolished Prinosil.

Friendless, King of the Jungle
From: Joseph.J.Marcheso.Jr.@dartmouth.edu (Joseph J. Marcheso Jr.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: A.O. Spoilers
Date: 28 Jan 93 04:49:38 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a5@newshost.dartmouth.edu


Seles d. Sabatini 6-1, 6-2

Graf d. Sanchez 7-5, 6-4 (???)


I'm not positive but this is what I hear.

Go GRAF!!!!!!
From: B536HIND@UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU (C. S. Sudarshana Bhat)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: If ...
Date: 25 Jan 1993 18:24:59 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

I guess it is time someone posted the whole poem on this net (those
NOT interested in "If ..." by Rudyard Kipling, please skip this post!).
This might need to be re-posted in the summer (Northern Hemisphere ;)
when Bud "Fortesque" Collins occupies the commentator's booth.

If ...  by Rudyard Kipling
------     ---------------

If you can keep your head when all about you
   Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
   But make allowance for their doubting too:
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
   Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
   And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:

If you can dream - and not make dreams your master:
   If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim:
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
   And treat those two imposters just the same:
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
   Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
   And stoop and build 'em up with your worn-out tools:

If you can make one heap of all your winnings
   And risk it on one turn of the pitch - and toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
   And never breathe a word about your loss:
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
   To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
   Except the will which says to them : "Hold on!"

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
   Or walk with Kings - nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
   If all men count with you, but none too much:
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
   With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
  And - which is more - you'll be a Man, my son!
From: roberto@dcs.gla.ac.uk (roberto)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Tomorrow the women's AO begins ........ (obvious predictions?)
Date: 27 Jan 93 10:39:10 GMT
Organization: Glasgow University Computing Science Dept.
Return-Path: <roberto@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: mail-news 2.0.5

Despite some difficulties for Seles and Sabatini in their quarter-finals, 
the top 4 seeds (women) are again in the semifinal. 

Surprising? Not at all! If one looks at the previous GS it is clear this 
has been the rule rather than the exception. 

Moreover, if Sanches-Vicario defeats Graf or even if Sabatini defeats Seles 
many people will talk about upsets: very strange isn't it? 

Well, chances are that the top 2 seeds will make it to the final again. 
Sabatini has never beaten Seles in a GS and usually plays badly after a 
tough match. In theory, Seles should win confortably. 

On the other hand, Graf usually doesn't lose to Sanches-Vicario frequently 
and she certainly remembers her defeat in the US open. Again, I believe 
Graf will win confortably. 

Hopefully, we will be able to see yet another GS final between the two best 
players. My prediction? 
 
Sorry to disappoint all you Seles (non-Graf) and Graf (non-Seles) fans, 
but I think the result is unpredictable. 

I am willing to see a close match (like the 92 French open) and this would 
make so satisfied that it would NOT matter who wins at the end. 

Roberto Barros
From: bui@ee470.ee.mcgill.ca (BUI/DON/MR)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Graf and Seles
Date: 22 Jan 93 15:14:17 GMT
Organization: EE Lab, McGill University EE Lab, Montreal

In article <1jnu30INNbng@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> patano@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Scott Patano) writes:
>      About the article which effectively said that Monica Seles was cheated
>      out of a grand slam last year by the British press, which had badgered 
>      her about the grunting during Wimbledon; it was absolutely ridiculous.
>
>      Seles was lucky to even have made it to the Wimbledon finals to face
>      Steffi Graf (I was shocked when she beat Navratilova).  Grass is
>      definitely not her best surface, and she looked almost awkward as she
>      tried to defend against Graf's un-erring forehands.  Seles was
>      finally annihilated 6-2,6-1; all the grunting in the world wouldn't have
>      saved her.
>
>      Graf is definitely my pick to win back the Australian open, especially if
>      she is successful with the new aspects of her game (i.e., the more
>      frequent net approaches and the new topspin backhand).
> 

	Maybe Monica wasn't meant to take the Grand Slam last year, but there's
	no stopping her this year ... on ANY surface ... and especially not
	by Graf.

	BTW, IMO the Australian is already Monica's, they're just playing to 
	see who gets to be runner-up.


							-Don
From: cd377@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Israel Yanez)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Graf and Seles
Date: 22 Jan 1993 17:56:17 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: cd377@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Israel Yanez)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, bui@ee470.ee.mcgill.ca (BUI/DON/MR) says:

>In article <1jnu30INNbng@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> patano@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Scott Patano) writes:
>>      About the article which effectively said that Monica Seles was cheated
>>      out of a grand slam last year by the British press, which had badgered 
>>      her about the grunting during Wimbledon; it was absolutely ridiculous.
>>
>>      Seles was lucky to even have made it to the Wimbledon finals to face
    ....(STuff deleted) 

>	no stopping her this year ... on ANY surface ... and especially not
>	by Graf.
>
>	BTW, IMO the Australian is already Monica's, they're just playing to 
>	see who gets to be runner-up.
>
>
>							-Don 
>


Monica MAY win a GS this year if she takes intensive lessons on grass, maybe 
from Graf?

MOnica's strengths are her mental toughness, her power to hit from BOTH sides
and her killer instincts.  These are not enough to win on grass....

If she wants to win Wimbledon, she'll have to come up with an all court game,
especially a solid net game, and she'll have to improve her on-court
speed.  She's not known for coming up with great "gets".

As far as the AO in the bag... Hmmmmm, maybe.  Hard courts are her best 
surface seeing that she lost to Sabatini in '92 Italian Open on clay, BARELY
survived Graf on clay in the French (10-8 in the 3rd), and shamefully shared
the grass court with Graf at Wimbledon ( I won't include the final score here,
may be too painful for die-hard Monica fans)..
 
-- 
=================================================================
"Your kiss just hindered my day...."     --k.d. lang
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
iyanez@csus.edu           California State University, Sacramento
From: HCQ3@MUSICT.MCGILL.CA (HCQ3)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Prediction (a good one)
Date: 27 Jan 93 01:49:50 GMT
Organization: McGill University

My prediction is that Steffi Graf will gain the #1 ranking this
year and Seles will eventually crack under Steffi's new and improved
 complete game.  Seles, in my opinion just doesn't have enough game
 to continue her success and Steffi will, sooner or later, arise once
 again as the dominant force in women's tennis.  i think seles'mental
 edge over many people will cease to exist as she gets defeated more
 and more this year.  and i think her reign as the queen of tennis
 will definitely end this year.

                                Graf is #1,
                                                    Ashley Gardner
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: am5@cec2.wustl.edu (Avik  Mukherjee)
Subject: Whatever happened to Pat Cash?
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 01:03:12 GMT

Is Pat Cash retired or something? What's he been up to lately?

-Vic

Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: phammond@cs.tcd.ie (Paul Hammond)
Subject: Re: satellite
Summary: Sky Sports are covering the Australian Open in Europe
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin (Computer Science)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 12:35:50 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.114411.25034@ghost.dsi.unimi.it> pellegri@ghost.dsi.unimi.it (leonardo pellegrini) writes:
>Does anyone know if there is a satellite in Europe that trasmit all the matches of the Australian's Open ?
>			Bye Leo
>

The summary says it all

Cheers

Paul
From: AS.TLK@forsythe.stanford.edu (Timmer)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: tidbit
Date: 27 Jan 1993 09:54:53 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

>No. 3 Sampras has a chance to reach #1 by winning the AO title.


Glad to hear it.  Not only can Pete hold his own at the baseline
against the likes of Courier, he can also mix it up and come into
the net.  However, I guess he has to prove his mental toughness at
this point....


                   Tim Kaufman
                   as.tlk@forsythe.stanford.edu
From: cs30@prism.gatech.EDU (Christopher Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Brief (Mostly Doubles) Day 8 Update
Date: 25 Jan 93 15:20:44 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


Mild spoilers for those watching tape-delay coverage follows:


I don't have the scores from the rest of Monday's singles matches,
although I do know that Edberg(2) advanced.  Brett Steven also won
his 4th round match in a five setter.

Some doubles scores from early Monday:

  + Men's Doubles (3rd round)
    -------------
    Fitzgerald/Jarryd(4) d. Eltingh/Haarhuis(13)   7-5 6-4
    Garnett/Middleton d. DeVries/MacPherson(6)     6-4 7-6
    Cannon/Melville d. Camporese/Krajicek          7-5 6-1
    Muller/J. Sanchez d. Kinnear/Salumaa(16)       6-7 6-4 6-3  *

  * It was the doubles team of Muller & Sanchez that upset the
    top-seeded "Woodies" in the first round.


  + Women's Doubles (3rd round)
    ---------------
    Neiland/Novotna(2) d. Davenport/Rubin          4-6 6-4 9-7
    McNeil/Stubbs(5) d. Gorrochategui/Harvey-Wild  6-3 7-6
    Shriver/Smylie(10) d. Adams/Bollegraf(7)       6-3 6-2


..Chris

-- 
Christopher Smith                        csmith@cc.gatech.edu
College of Computing, Georgia Tech       404/853-0937
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: PH412000@brownvm.brown.edu (Quan Xiong)
Subject: test, ignore please!
Organization: Brown University
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:51:05 GMT

this is a test!

Quan
Organization: Kyr's Condom Cantina
X-Subliminal-Message: Memory is Divine Punishment
Rationale: Hack and Slay!!
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 11:07:07 EST
From: Shane M. Swiderski <SMS124@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Tomorrow the women's AO begins ........ (obvious predictions?)

I agree that the women are a great deal more predictable up through the quarter
s, but I believe the Sabatini-Seles match will be closer than many expect (at l
east I hope).  Graf should win the other in straight sets.
I am going to go out on a limb and say Sabatini over Graf in three sets despite
 her weak serve.  She will have to rely on a strong forecourt volleying day.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Re: Seles vs Graf. Any doubts who is #1 ?
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 08:10:50 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.231803.21078@cs.wisc.edu> solodov@monterey1.cs.wisc.edu (Mikhail V. Solodov) writes:
>	  When , some day, I shall start teaching my kid the game of tennis,
>	  I'll use the tapes with Graf to show how one shouldn't play.
>	  I am serious . Well, almost.

If I were you, I would show your son (assuming you'll have a boy) tapes
of the four Wimbledon finals Graf won; tell him not to play like her,
and the plate is NOT the trophy he wants to win. Then show him tapes of
Beckers victories and tell him that the cup is what his goal should be. :-)
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     AT&T, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ,  07748  USA
From: smuench@i61s7.ira.uka.de (Stefan Muench)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: IBM/ATP Computer Ranking Method
Date: 25 Jan 1993 08:11:04 GMT
Organization: University of Karlsruhe, Institute for Real-time Computer Systems and Robotics (IPR), Germany
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: i61s7.ira.uka.de

In article <1jvmc8INNfs7@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> patano@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu 
(Scott Patano) wants to know how the ranking system works. Well, here comes
an article which was posted by clc5q@uvacs.cs.Virginia.EDU (Clark L. Coleman)
on Wed, 26 Aug 1992. I hope the system hasn't changed much since then...

Note: This is the system for the men only. Sorry, no WTA methods available.

###########################################################################
Article: 7241 of rec.sport.tennis
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: farrell@coral.cs.jcu.edu.au (John Farrell)
Subject: Re: Results: Australian Open Day 4 Report (Jan 21)
Organization: James Cook University
Date: 22 Jan 93 00:00:27 GMT



In <1993Jan21.133150.6480@cc.gatech.edu> csmith@cc.gatech.edu (Christopher Smith) writes:
Press `n' to skip results:

Today's Results:

  + Men (2nd round)
    ---
    Boetsch d. Svensson 5-7 2-6 6-3 7-6(7-5) 10-8
    Olhovsky d. Denman 6-4 6-2 6-4
    Stark d. Carbonell 6-4 6-5 6-3
    Costa d. Kulti 6-3 6-7(4-7) 6-4 6-3
    Ferreira d. Karbacher 6-3 4-6 6-2 7-5
    Steven d. Muster 6-2 7-6(8-6) 6-4
    Black d. Goeliner 6-1 6-4 6-4
    Washington d. Vacek 6-2 7-5 6-1
    Antonitsch d. Pridham 6-3 6-3 6-7(8-10) 6-2
    Bergstrom d. Holm 7-5 2-6 6-4 1-6 6-4

  + Women (2nd round)
    -----
    Gorrochategui d. Temesvari-Trunkos 6-1 7-5
    Sawamatsu d. Thoren 6-1 7-5
    Porwik d. Graham 6-3 7-5
    Babel d. Price 7-5 1-6 6-3
    Huber(11) d. Martinek 6-2 6-4
    K. Maleeva(14) d. Monami 6-1 6-4
    Rittner d. Habsudova 6-2 7-6(7-5)
    Zvereva d. Hack 7-5 6-7(3-7) 6-3
    Maleeva-Fragniere d. Wasserman 6-4 6-1
    Helgeson d. Meier 6-3 6-3
    M. Maleeva d. Langrove 6-1 6-0


Friendless and the Cybermen
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: am5@cec2.wustl.edu (Avik  Mukherjee)
Subject: Most interesting matchup in AO
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 22:06:26 GMT

I believe the most interesting match in the round of 16 mens will be the
Courier-Bruguera match. I predict that will go to 4 sets. Also I think
Washington and Sampras will go to four, possibly five sets. However there is
little doubt in my mind that Courier and Edberg will reach the final (unless
Sampras doesn't put on another one of those lackluster performances in his
possible semifinal matchup with Edberg. 

B
C
Sampras doesn't p

little doubt in my mind that the tournament is either E
A
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Men's Quarter Final Outcome, SPOILERS (Re: obvious predictions?)
Date: 27 Jan 93 11:39:37 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <9301271039.AA00642@sumatra.dcs.gla.ac.uk>, roberto@dcs.gla.ac.uk (roberto) writes:
> Despite some difficulties for Seles and Sabatini in their quarter-finals, 
> the top 4 seeds (women) are again in the semifinal. 
> 
> Surprising? Not at all! If one looks at the previous GS it is clear this 
> has been the rule rather than the exception. 

> Well, chances are that the top 2 seeds will make it to the final again. 
> Sabatini has never beaten Seles in a GS and usually plays badly after a 
> tough match. In theory, Seles should win confortably. 

I agree with the above. However, for the second time in a row,
most of the top seeds make it to the semi final of a Grand Slam
event for the "more unpredictable" men's side. In the 1992 US Open,
the top fours seeds were also the four semi finalists.

Courier, Edberg, and Sampras, the top three seeds, along with Stich,
the 14th seed, were all winners in the quarter finals in Melbourne
on Wednesday. I don't have all the scores; I am sure that Chris Smith
will post them shortly. Courier will play Stich in one semi. Edberg
will have a rematch of the 1992 US Open final with Sampras in the
other semi.
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     AT&T, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ,  07748  USA
From: patano@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Scott Patano)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: A.O., what else?
Date: 27 Jan 1993 23:47:19 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: huey.cc.utexas.edu

     Here are my predictions:

     Women:  Seles over Sabatini in straight sets (Gabi looked really
             weak in her last match against Pierce); Graf over
             Sanchez-Vicario in straight sets (Steffi is just playing
             too well for Arantxa to handle).

             Graf over Seles in final, straight sets.

     Men:    Courier over whoever else makes it to the final (Jim's
             playing solid tennis, despite the not-so-strong serve).

     I might be completely wrong, but hey, everyone else is making
     predictions.  ;)

     GO STEFFI!
From: rpm@bach.wag.caltech.edu (Richard P. Muller)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Women's College Rankings
Date: 26 Jan 93 14:47:45 GMT
Organization: Materials Simulations Center
NNTP-Posting-Host: bach.wag.caltech.edu


What are the top teams in Women's NCAA tennis this year? Who are the
top players?
--

--
 Rick Muller 	    rpm@wag.caltech.edu
--
They said, "there's too much caffeine in your bloodstream,
and a lack of real spice in your life." -The Smiths



 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: am5@cec2.wustl.edu (Avik  Mukherjee)
Subject: Brett Steven
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:47:57 GMT

can someone tell me about Brett Steven's game? I'm curious to know, since I've
never seen him. I doubt too many others have seen him either. 

-vic

am5@cec1.wustl.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis,soc.culture.australian
From: farrell@coral.cs.jcu.edu.au (John Farrell)
Subject: Re: Article in Gentlemen's Quarterly
Keywords: an American perspective
Organization: James Cook University
Date: 21 Jan 93 23:36:28 GMT

In <1993Jan21.152440.10515@chpc.utexas.edu> eddie@chpc.utexas.edu (G'day) writes:
> The article mentions some words we can use to pass ourselves off as dinkum
>Aussies (genuine Australians). Please direct flames (if any) to /dev/null :>).
> Yih, mate. (yes buddy). Ahrs-TRY-ya. (Australia). Fair dinkum. (On the level).
>Sickie. (Day off). wowers. (kill joys). drongo. (worthless moron).
                    ^^^^^^ wowsers
>stickybeak. (nosy person). One of the best IMO is Na-ow warries! (No worries).

  A drongo is actually a bird which (I think) makes a particularly stupid
noise. So a reasonably accurate translation is "dodo".

>Well... I hope you got a chuckle or two from this.

  About as much as you get from translations of "booger", "sit on it",
"fuckin' A" and "press the flesh". But you mugs would never pass as Aussies
because you've got those bloody awful septic accents...


Friendless, fuckin' A.
From: cs30@prism.gatech.EDU (Christopher Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Day 10 Report (SPOILERS)
Date: 27 Jan 93 13:27:04 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


Spoilers follow:


    Edberg(2) d. Bergstrom      6-4 6-4 6-1
    Courier(1) d. Korda(7)      6-1 6-0 6-4


One day 10 mixed doubles result:

    Shriver/Stolle d. Rehe/Visser(6)           6-4 6-4   (2nd round)


Rest of day 9 doubles results:

  + Men (QF)
    ---
    Fitzgerald/Jarryd(4) d. Garnett/Middleton  7-5 6-3 6-4
    Visser/Warder(10) d. Grabb/Reneberg(2)     6-3 6-4 4-6 4-6 22-20 !!

  + Women (3rd round)
    -----
    Martinez/Sanchez Vicario(3) d.
                        K. Maleeva/Tauziat     6-3 3-0 ret
    M. Fernandez/Garrison(4) d. Basuki/Miyagi  6-2 6-2

  + Mixed (2nd round)
    -----
    Jones/Zvereva(2) d. Bollegraf/Nijssen      5-7 6-4 6-1
    Garrison/Leach(3) d. McQuillan/MacPherson  6-3 7-6
    Smylie/Fitgerald d. Jaggard-Lai/Eltingh    6-2 6-3
    Hetherington/Michibata d. Radford/Norval   6-2 6-4


Note:

  Grabb/Reneberg lose another epic five-setter!  (Remember Wimbledon?)
  This match took 5h 17m to complete, which is not the longest doubles
  match in Australian Open history or the one with the most total games.
  The record is 5h 29m and 87 games from 1990, a match in which Danie
  Visser was also a participant.


..Chris

-- 
Christopher Smith                        csmith@cc.gatech.edu
College of Computing, Georgia Tech       404/853-0937