HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Packer News - Buckley signs
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date: 11 SEP 92 15:17:16    

Terrell Buckley signed today for $7.1 million for 4 years ($1.775 M/yr).
He flew down to Tampa Bay immediately after signing.  He says he's 
going to 'really scrap' to try to play this weekend.  Yeah, sure, 
fine.

Brian Noble's contract is reportedly for $750K.  Quite a bargain in my 
opinion.  Noble didn't play in most 3nd and 5+ situations last year so 
I don't know if he would have been in the game when Allen broke those 
2 long runs because I don't remember what the situation was in either 
case.  But D'Onofrio was 'trapped' on both plays.

Packers Practice Squad:
WR - Chris Holder (waived by Packers)
DE - Sabastion Barrie (waived by Packers)
OT - Brent Griffith  (waived by Vikings)
WR - Horace Ham  (waived by Falcons)
OT - Brian Brauninger  (waived by Cardinals)

BTW - Anthony Dilwig was cut by the Raiders last week even though he 
hired a plane to tow a banner saying "Mr. Davis, give me a chance - 
Dilwig".  (What a character.)  Also, Scott Stephen signed with the Rams.

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold)
Subject: Re: Who's got the toughest schedule?
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 17:52:16 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.063316.7742@ncar.ucar.edu>,
gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) writes:

>tb> Tony Bechtold
>
>tb> The 49ers probably have the toughest schedule again this year.
 >
>  Doubtful. I've heard the Broncos have the toughest schedule, based on last
>  year's standings.
 >
>  Here's both team's schedules, you can figure it out:
 >
>  Broncos
>  home: Raiders,Chargers,Chiefs,Seahawks,Oilers,Jets,Giants,Cowboys
>  away: Raiders,Chargers,Chiefs,Seahawks,Eagles,Browns,Redskins,Bills
 >
>  49ers
>  home: Falcons,Saints,Rams,Bills,Eagles,Dolphins,Buccanneers,Lions
>  away: Falcons,Saints,Rams,Giants,Jets,Patriots,Cardinals,Vikings
>
>  Let's be adult, OK?

I would say that both teams have really difficult schedules. One
would have to go really in depth on evaluating each team being
played, and how they have faired against them in the past few years
in order to figure out who had the toughest games to play.
Any interdivisional game is tough. Especially when you are the team
who is usually wining the division year after year. Teams in your
division really crank it up a notch when they play you.

I'll say one thing. If I had the chance to swap schedules with the
Bronco's, I wouldn't do it!!

                                                  Tony
                                               GO 49ERS!!!
From: emilio@crchh444.BNR.CA (Emilio Rivera)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dallas 23 Washington 10
Date: 8 Sep 92 17:00:47 GMT
Reply-To: emilio@crchh444.BNR.CA (Emilio Rivera)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.

In article <1992Sep8.052459.2111@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>,
stapleto@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Kathy Stapleton) writes:
|>In article <1992Sep8.040752.4946@uwm.edu> melissa@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
(Melissa C Merrill) writes:
|>>
|>>	Great first MNF game. Dallas has won 23-10. Washington looked
|>>	pretty bad, not up to their Super bowl form, but I know the
|>>	fans of both teams will have things to say about this game...
|>
|>     Does anyone out there have any ideas as to WHY the Redskins were
|>not up to their Super Bowl form????  I hear that Gibbs was saying that
|>the offense has been very unorganized as of late...and even though I
|>am a loyal Skin fan through and through, I cannot say even ONE nice
|>thing about this darn game.  Not ONE!  The touchdown made by the Skins
|>was pure luck and I could not believe all of those open holes that the
|>Skins defense let by so Emmett could strut his stuff to go another
|>game 100+ yards...  And I have NEVER NEVER seen the Redskin offensive
|>line do such HORRIBLE blocking for Ryp....I remember last year...only
|>*seven* sacks were allowed...  *Seven*!!!!!!!!!!!!  And this game,
|>*two*?  Anyone have any explanations?
|>
|>>
|>>	Mark
|>>	GO VIKINGS!
|>
|>
|>     A very distraught,
|>


   Let me give you a hint.    Charles Haley.......................







Go Cowboys 
|>     Kathy
|>
|>
|>-- 
|>"Mistletoe can be deadly if you eat it." | Kathy "Loupy" Stapleton
|>"But a kiss can be deadlier if you       | Dept. of ECE
|> mean it."                               | George Mason University
|>           -- Batman to Catwoman         | stapleto@gmuvax2.gmu.edu
                                 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: emilio@crchh444.BNR.CA (Emilio Rivera)
Subject: Re: Monday Night Football announcers are terrible
Reply-To: emilio@crchh444.BNR.CA (Emilio Rivera)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 17:12:06 GMT

In article <BILLMS.92Sep9110440@z.eecs.umich.edu>, billms@eecs.umich.edu
(William Mangione-Smith) writes:
|>In article <1992Sep09.140343.301@bnr.ca> patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca
(Patrick Power) writes:
|>
|>       The one quote that cracked me up was made by FGifford.  Referring to
|>   Emmitt's goal of a 2000yd season, he said that a goal of 125 yards per
|>   CARRY was not unrealistic.  Reality, what a concept!  :)
|>
|>quick: name the last team to lose a non-planB free agent.  It may end up
|>costing Dallas more, but he probably won't even get an offer from another
|>team.
|>
     Could you explain what the heck is your point.........
               
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Subject: Re: Dolphins vs browns
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Madison
Date: 14 Sep 92 19:08:22 CDT

In article <platkus.716507310@mueller.ecn.purdue.edu> platkus@mueller.ecn.purdue.edu (Shawn W Platkus) writes:
>
>Here's an afterthought.  This year, there are now four teams that opened on 
>Monday night.  This ever happen before?

Who is the 4th team?  Cleveland opened last Sunday (although most of us
would like to forget the game).
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bradletm@ntmtv.UUCP (Tim Bradley)
Subject: Re: Ex-Niner Sonjay ????
Originator: bradletm@rastaban
Organization: Northern Telecom Incorporated
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 23:12:38 GMT

From article <27000094@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>, by bvernon@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Vernon R. Blakes):
> 
> I heard Holmgren is starting Sonjay Beach opposite Sterling Sharpe.
> 
> Does anyone have any information to back this up ?
> 

Yes.  He caught a TD last week.  Also, the Sporting News NFL mag states
that Beach will be the 2nd starting wideout.


					- Tim
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: taunting for 15
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 20:45:03 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.101600@mccall.com> scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis) writes:
>
>In article <1992Sep9.143204.20357@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>>In article <Adriene_Nazaretian.14.716045470@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Evil Sheriff of Dodge City) writes:
>>>During the 9ers/NYG game, I believe there were 2 taunting calls. 15yard
>>>loss.  (how are you supposed to be psyched up as a defense and 
>>>suppress yourself at the same time)
>>>
>>I use to be weekend warrior playing basketball, football (I still play
>>volleyball) and also lettered in 3 sports in high school.  In the heat
>>of a game (even volleyball) it is natural to try to demoralize your
>>opponent.  Sometimes you get in players face or make some physcial contact
>>to let know you can "kick" their butt (usually figuratively).  IMHO the >taunting rule is idiotic if they are going to throw the flag just because 
>>their is name calling or fingers being pointed (Jeesh!).  I believe it is 
>>part of the game.
>
>Taunting shouldn't be part of the game.   While I'll agree that the
>interpretation by the refs will make for very inconsistent calls.
>If you need to get psyched, go back to your teammates and butt heads,
>give high 5's, dog/pig-pile, whatever.  It is not natural to demoralize
>your opponent, it only seems that way due to conditioning and repetition
>of these actions.  
>--
>Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
>(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
>(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
>
I guess you and I are at opposite ends on this topic.  I guess it depends
on how you were raised and what you learned in your formative years as a young
kid.  To me, taunting is natural.  It intimadates some people so much that
their play diminishes. It is also a form of one upmanship in verbal street
talk.  It is not for everyone.  NOTE:  have you seen the Spike Lee T.V.
commerical of  two teams (young black men and white men) playing basketball?
It is a lesson on getting along a people, but the ad starts off with some
major name calling.  If you saw the movie "White Men Can't Jump", then
you will know exactly what I am talking about.  I just believe in "trash
talking" if you can back it up (Remember Ali?).  I can guarantee you, if
I was playing against you and I picked up and the fact that you didn't
like being taunted, then I would be at you non-stop.  If it resulted in
a fight, then I would back it up, irregardless of the outcome.
-- 
        ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
 		"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
	       is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Pack News
Date: 11 Sep 92 15:38:28 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center

In article <00960745.05213A80@vms.csd.mu.edu>, 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu writes...

>hi there
>--------
> 
>There will be a news conference this afternoon
>"concerning" Buckley accordind to a report
>in the local Radio this morning. They even
>talked with Mike Holmgren this morning over
>phone but he did not reveal anything.
>Well, I don't think the news conference was
>arranged to tell the fans and the media that
>Terrel is still holding out. IMO it woulbe
>about either his signing or a possible trade.
>there have not been any indication of a trade 
>in the past few weeks, so the signing seems more
>possible but one never knows. I will post the news
>if I happen to catch it sometyimes later.
>Bye,
> 
>************************************************************
>N.Ramasubramanian    GO BREWERS - BULLS -93  - HAIL 'SKINS
> 
>Politicians' statements tend to have a low specific gravity.
>They carry less weight  than their volume would suggest.
>		- Jonathan Miller
>************************************************************
John G. Heim                                 Email:  heim@macc.wisc.edu

"If there's something wrong with the computer, its sophisticated diagnostics 
will notify you of the situation by assuming an appearance that, for the most
part, is dark and lifeless." - The Adventures of Lone Wolf Scientific
Organization: Central Michigan University
Date: Tuesday, 8 Sep 1992 21:56:11 EDT
From: <3ZASIB3@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: A VIKING WOOFER!!

I agree with jeff.  Why not decide now that the Vikes have it all sewed up?
Admittedly, the Vikings were impressive in pre-season.  But to require OT
with the Packers?  I'll be at that game on Sunday to be witness to Barry
and Rodney take it to the Purple (?) People "whatever-they-do".  Being a
Cardinal alum, I do wish Dennis Green well.  But I he'll have to do his
winning someplace other than the 'Dome.  Have you noticed, it's hard for
visiting teams to win there?  One other thing, after the Washington bashing
by the Cowboys, the Vikings 30-0 does not seem to be as impressive.  I think
you're woofing up the wrong tree.  Bob
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 09:41:59 EDT
From: Todd Bobenrieth <TAB129@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Merrino Breaks Hearts in Claveland.

He hates him so bad....he can't even spell Marino's name right!
From: nrc@cbnews.cb.att.com (N. Richard Caldwell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bengals uniforms
Date: 15 Sep 92 19:11:24 GMT
Organization: AT&T Network Systems  -  Columbus, Ohio

From article <1992Sep15.185137.23651@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, by tim.g.thompson@att.com (Tim Thompson):
> |> In article <9209151435.AA19666@rdxsun40.aud.alcatel.com>, ckoontz@RDXSUN40.AUD.ALCATEL.COM (Carl H. Koontz) writes:
> |> Does anybody know why the Cincinnati Bengals have started wearing
> |> white jerseys at Riverfront?  Is this a Dave Shula original?
> 
> If memory serves me correctly, the home team can decide which
> uniforms they will wear, with the visting team having to wear
> the opposite. [etc...] 

You're exactly right.  The Bengals have chosen to wear their white
uniforms for the first two home games to reduce the effects of the
late summer heat.  I don't care much for the white uniforms so I'll 
be glad when they get back into their proper home uniforms.  



"Don't drive too slowly."                 Richard Caldwell
                                          AT&T Network Systems
                                          att!cbnews!nrc
                                          nrc@cbnews.att.com
From: jain@bartok.CES.CWRU.Edu (Ashish Jain)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: I shudder to think.....
Date: 11 Sep 92 14:22:23
Organization: Computer Engineering and Science, CWRU, Cleveland OH.
Distribution: rec
Reply-To: jain@alpha.ces.cwru.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: bartok.ces.cwru.edu


Now think of this. Browns get the 1st pick overall next year.
Hilgenberg makes it to the Pro Bowl on his past laurels, and Browns
give up their 2nd pick (29th overall) to Bears for Hilgenberg who is
at teh end of this season so beat up that he can only contribute only
for one more season.

All Browns fan please  SCREAM @#$@#$@#@$@#@$@# Billy Boy
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

--
Ashish Jain
jain@alpha.ces.cwru.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bohnert@leland.Stanford.EDU (matthew bohnert)
Subject: Re: Bucs coach
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 23:44:46 GMT

>>>Yeah,  I know for a fact that the "official" NFL stance is that the
>>>1979 Buccaneers is the team that made the expansion-to-playoff team
>>>transition the fastest.
>>
>>Now for some real trivia....does anyone know the fastest expansion-to-
>>playoff team in major league sports?
>>
>   Didn't KC's Royals make it pretty quick?
>
 
The Chicago Bulls made the Bball playoffs their first year.

Matt Bohnert
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Call for Football Jokes...
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 01:56:56 GMT

In article <BuBEyF.C5x@news.larc.nasa.gov> azjohn@eagle.larc.nasa.gov (John Paul Phillips) writes:
>In article <1992Sep9.034239.29882@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John 
>P. Gloria) writes:
>
>> In article <1992Sep9.011035.10891@math.ucla.edu> 
>rfedkiw@redwood.math.ucla.edu 
>> (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:
>> >L.A. Rams
>> >
>> Heeeee, Haaaaaaa, Haaaaa, Heeeeeee, ...pause, catch my breath, wipe
>> the tears off my face, pick myself of the floor....  Heeeee, Haaaaaaa, 
>> Haaaaa, Heeeeeee....GRRRRINNNNNNNNN.
>> 
>> Thanks, made my evening! :-)
>
>Allow me to give you another one:
>
> Giants coach Handley.
>
Ditto! :-)

How about:

 Elway as MVP of the 1993 SB! NOT!

-- 
        ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
 		"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
	       is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mcs@fps.com (Mike Sanfratello)
Subject: Re: Washington Redskins News - 9/8/92
Organization: CRAY Research
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 18:21:35 GMT

I knew there was a good point to these "what the skins had for breakfast"
posts :~)  I enjoyed this one!

mike
From: bubba@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Gary Beason)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Who's got the toughest schedule?
Date: 9 Sep 92 08:01:24 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Purdue University

In article <1992Sep9.063316.7742@ncar.ucar.edu> gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) writes:
>tb> Tony Bechtold
>
>tb> The 49ers probably have the toughest schedule again this year.
>
>  Doubtful. I've heard the Broncos have the toughest schedule, based on last
>  year's standings.
>
>  Here's both team's schedules, you can figure it out:
>
>  Broncos
>  home: Raiders,Chargers,Chiefs,Seahawks,Oilers,Jets,Giants,Cowboys
>  away: Raiders,Chargers,Chiefs,Seahawks,Eagles,Browns,Redskins,Bills
>
>  49ers
>  home: Falcons,Saints,Rams,Bills,Eagles,Dolphins,Buccanneers,Lions
>  away: Falcons,Saints,Rams,Giants,Jets,Patriots,Cardinals,Vikings


The Broncos look to have the more difficult road schedule.  But why
just these two?  Dallas has a tough one too (which closely resembles
the Deadskins'):

home: Deadskins, Cardinals, Seahawks, Chiefs, Eagles, Rams, Giants,
Bears
away: Giants, Eagles, Raiders, Lions, Cardinals, Broncos, Deadskins,
Falcons

Now, four of the last 5 games for the 49ers are in SF.  Dallas's last
games are tough:  They play *in* Phoenix, playing the Giants four days
later for Deadbird Day (virtually no practice).  THEN, Dallas plays 3
STRAIGHT away games--at very likely playoff teams: Broncos, Deadskins,
and Falcons.

None of the other teams mentioned plays that kind of road trip,
particularly at the end of the season.  Because of that schedule, I
don't think Dallas will fare well in postseason, if they get there.

Do you think the schedule-makers liked SF?  (something of a joke, but
god knows the media would love to have a west coast team back in the
playoffs, particularly SF--as would the NFL).

Of course, I'm not sure how significant road games are these days.
Certainly, all the teams just about in the AFC West and NFC East play
damn tough schedules.


Gary Beason
bubba@mace.cc.purdue.edu

"Bradshaw couldn't spell CAT if you spotted him the C and the A."

--Hollywood Henderson
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pagel@sharebase.com (Tom Pagel)
Subject: Tootie Robbins
Organization: NCR/ShareBase Corporation
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 92 23:12:55 GMT

packer fans:

what's the word on tootie robbins?  i thought i saw him standing on 
the sidelines with his arm in a sling and some other guy playing RT.

if he's out for an extended period, it's big trouble for green bay.

well, at least ruettgers had a great game against doleman.  :-)  :-)

i only got to see the second half (no audio either - it was at a casino),
but they didn't look too bad.

tom		pagel@cheesehead.sharebase.com
From: chf0@harvey.gte.com (Curtis Fennell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Dolphins News - Clayton placed on IR
Date: 8 Sep 92 20:42:18 GMT
Organization: GTE Laboratories

According to Saturday's Boston Globe, Mark Clayton was put on injured
reserve and Jim Jensen was resigned.  Clayton has a strained disk (or
something like that) which he also had last year, but played with
anyway.

I hope Clayton isn't out too long - we need him.

Curt "I always pick the Dolphins - even against Buffalo!"  Fennell
			DOLFAN in New England.             
Miami Dolphins - Winningest team in Professional Sports since 1970!!
'72 Dolphins - The perfect team in the perfect season - 17-0
-- 
Curt Fennell			* chf0@gte.com
Unix System Administrator	* (617) 466-2142
GTE Labs, 40 Sylvan Road	* "Get down off that cross!
Waltham, MA, 02254		*  Somebody needs the wood"
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Madden sucks
Date: 15 Sep 92 17:22:55 GMT
Organization: Chevron

(Eber Lambert) writes:
>ahall@fmrco.com (Andrew Hall) writes:
>>I can't believe that anyone likes Madden.  He is SO bad.
>>He gets all the facts wrong (watch his replays, at least
>>50% of the time the players don't go where he drew the
>>line).  He can't speak english....
>
>To all Madden haters: try a few games with Namath or Theisman/Haden 
>(they're indistinguishable) and you'll be convinced that Madden is god. 
>
>As a matter of fact, try just _one_ game with Namath and I guarantee
>you'll run out of the room screaming by the end of the 3rd qtr.
>
>Personally I would like to see Hank Schram on TV. The man is brilliant.

Sooooo, soooo right you are.  Namath and Theismann are *THE* worst,
along with Mike Patrick (for getting in the booth with Joe in the first
place).  

What sets Madden and Stram apart is their obvious, coach's knowledge
that isn't SHOVED down your throat -- unlike Joe, Joe, and the MNF guys.

Saints fans are blessed enough to have Hank Stram as the color man for
the Saints Radio Network (he lives in N.O. 'burbs)!!


-- 
GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!!    | "There once was a deputy named Fife,
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!!!!    |  Who carried a gun and a knife.
James Clyde  LSU '91    |  The gun was all dusty, the knife was all rusty,
  Mayberry Graffiti =>  |  'Cause he never caught a crook in his life."
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: michalis@socrates.umd.edu (Michalis Pachatouridis)
Subject: SUPERBOWL WINNERS 
Organization: University of Maryland University College
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 23:55:09 GMT

Last time a Superbowl winner DID NOT start the season
with a 2-0 record was 1987, when the Wash. Redskins
lost their 1st game in week 2 (21-20 @ Atlanta).


mp
From: mdm@austin.ibm.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 1992 NFL Predictions
Date: 8 Sep 92 17:36:04 GMT
Reply-To: mdm%shanghai.austin.ibm.com@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com (Mike Manning)
Organization: IBM Austin (AIX Development)
Originator: mdm@shanghai.austin.ibm.com


In article <6SEP199203222038@venus.tamu.edu>, clb2515@venus.tamu.edu (BRAUN, CHRISTOPHER L) writes:
> These are the way things will likely end up this season as I see it.
> 
> AFC East                       NFC East
> 1. Jets       		       1. Philadelphia
> 2. Miami     		       2. Washington
> 3. New England  	       3. Giants
> 4. Buffalo		       4. Dallas
> 5. Indianapolis                5. Phoenix
> 
> AFC Central                    NFC Central
> 1. Houston                     1. Minnesota
> 2. Cleveland                   2. Chicago
> 3. Cincinnati                  3. Detroit
> 4. Pittsburgh                  4. Green Bay
>                                5. Tampa Bay 
> AFC West
> 1. Kansas City                 NFC West
> 2. Denver                      1. San Francisco
> 3. Raiders                     2. Atlanta
> 4. San Diego                   3. New Orleans
> 5. Seattle                     4. Rams
> 
> Playoffs:
> Cleveland at Jets              New Orleans at Minnesota
> Denver at Miami                Atlanta at Washington
> 
> Jets at Kansas City            Minnesota at San Francisco
> Denver at Houston              Washington at Philadelphia
> 
> Kansas City at Houston         Minnesota at Philadelphia
> 
> Super Bowl XXVII:
> Houston over Philadelphia           (I'll guess 26-23 OT)
>                                               - gotcha Fo!
> 
> Kindly submitted by Christopher Lee Braun, football genius.
> "Don't make me trounce you."
> 
> "Bill Walsh is the greatest man who ever lived.  I want him to bear my 
>  children."   A&M 10, Stanford 7- August 26, 1992.
> 
> 

I have to say that if this is the way you see the season ending standings
then you desperately need glasses!   However, your choice of Super Bowl
combatants may not be far off.   I think I may be starting to see what
you're saying ... it's a joke right?
-- 
 Mike Manning                  Internet: Coming soon!
 AIX Development               IBM Net:  mdm@shanghai.austin.ibm.com
 Austin, Texas                 VM Net:   Are you kidding?
 DISCLAIMER: My views are seldom shared by anyone and certainly not IBM.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro