HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Montana throwing again...ho hum
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:56:59 GMT
Organization: Yale University

In article <1992Nov6.172542.16468@menudo.uh.edu> st1ge@Rosie.UH.EDU (Edward Hui) writes:
>From: st1ge@Rosie.UH.EDU (Edward Hui)
>Subject: Re: Montana throwing again...ho hum
>Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 17:25:42 GMT
>In article <1992Nov5.201241.1698@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>, marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Bob Marshall) writes:
>>Joe Montana worked out at an undisclosed Bay Area location on Tuesday,
>>throwing about 75 passes to John Taylor and Wesley Walls.  After the
>>workout Montana said that he "felt great" and that there was absolutely
>>no pain. Reporters asked Wesley Walls how Montana looked, and his only
>>response was "How did he look? He had on a Toronto Blue Jays cap". And
>>of course the reporters got nothing out of John Taylor.
>>

[stuff deleted]
=============================
>
>       It would be nice if the Niners have already clinched a playoff spot
>or wrapped up the division title before the last week of the season.  Then
>Seifert could play Montana on the final game against the Lions if it is
>meaningless.  To have Joe playing a Monday Night, nationally televised
>game at home would be a good way to bid farewell.
>

On MNF 1/2time talk Montana says he wants to play and start if he's feeling 
100%.  He indicated that if he was 100% and benched he would look elsewhere 
to finish his career.

This made it clear that he does NOT want to retire, although he said he 
wants to stay in SF, but if they bench him he will look for opportunities 
elsewhere.

The 9ers would be fools to let him go, wouldnt they?  Or do 9er fans see him 
retiring.  Are you happy with Young and your 3rd string (Bono?)

Where would he WANT to play anyway?  

Adriene L. Nazaretian            G         Nazaretian-Adriene@Yale.Edu
Sr Technical Specialist       G  I         Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.CIS.YALE.EDU
Computing and Info Systems    O  A         Adriene@YALEADS.BITNET
Yale University                  N         Adriene@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU
175 Whitney Avenue               T         Voice (203) 432-6683
New Haven, CT. 06520             S         FAX  (203) 432-6165
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: 49ers whip Dallas in NFC Championship.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 12:34:24 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <1dv6phINNr8@male.EBay.Sun.COM>, 49ers@eb5ts4.EBay.Sun.COM (Renie Maycon) writes:
> The 49ers will ship Dallas in the NFC Championship game. because dallas is a 
> young team that will fold under pressure. Any Comments?
> :

      Where are they shipping them and how much is postage on an
entire NFL team?             
                             -doug THE dolfan-
From: jblixt@neon.cdc.com (Jon Blixt)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Date: 11 Nov 92 15:14:27 GMT
Organization: RUBL  Commish- Real Usenet Basketball League

Here are some trade items for the Vikings.

BEST:

I don't have alot of past experience but the Deal that got Mike Merriweather
from the Stealers for a #1 draft choice was a good one.  Merriweather plays
almost every down and has been a big play person on the defense.

WORST:

Here is where I am fairly sure of myself.  The Vikings trade to get Hershell
Walker has to one of the worst in NFL history not just the Vikes.  

First, Hershell plays extremely well his first game as a Viking.  In the 
next two years, he comes close to repeating that performance less than five
times.  The Vikings release him along with a few other veterans and become
a Better team without him.(Yes, I'm saying had the Vikings dumped Hershell
after his first year with them, they would have been better off)

Now, look at what the Vikings gave up.  At least four players: Isaac Holt,
he is the Cowboys CB, Darrin Nelson - a useful also-ran, an outside linebacker
who now plays for Tampa I beleive.  Remember the Cowboys traded him to
Tampa even though the Vikings put a clause excluding them from trading him
to an NFC Central team.  The Cowboys sent him to New England who immediately
traded him to Tampa(coincidence- NOT).  I can't remember the other players.

Finally, the Vikings gave 7 count'em 7 draft choices.  THREEE #1 picks, THREE
#2, and a third round choice.  Could someone tell me who these players
turned out to be for Dallas.

Monty Hall never made such a bad or good deal.  I shudder to think how
impressive this team could be with those picks and players.  Then again,
without replacing Captain Ahab(I mean Jerry Burns) this team may have been
average into the 21rst century.

-Jon
--------
Jon Blixt                  "You so ugly I could stick yo face in some dough  
Control Data               and make gorilla cookies."                        
Minnepolis, MN                          Sanford & Son  Fred to Aunt Ester   
jblixt@neon.aqeng.cdc.com                                                      
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ecaxron@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov (Ron Graham)
Subject: Re: San Diego vs. Cleveland
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 13 Nov 1992 10:34 EST  

In article <1992Nov12.224622.15936@ncsu.edu>, delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu 
     (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE) writes...

>I take it you will bleed purple if the Vikes win, right????
>         :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)

That would be a great trick.  No, the Vikings are not a good enough 
team to win the San Diego/Cleveland game.  :-)

RG

"[Jay Hilgenberg] will play a critical role in, well, protecting the
 LIFE of Bernie Kosar."  -  Art Modell
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kschnitz@encore.com (Kevin Schnitzius)
Subject: Re: Randall benched for WEEK TEN
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 23:14:48 GMT

rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K) writes:
>joseph.m.dakes writes:
>>I'll say he's putting his neck on the line.  Not only with Randall's
>>ego, but with Braman's wallet.  McMahon's contract has alot of insentives
>>in it.  If he has a big game(s) Braman will be paying McMahon a fortune
>>and he'll be paying Randall an even bigger fortune to sit on the bench.
>>I haven't heard any comments from Braman about Kotite's decision, have
>>you?

>I haven't heard any reaction by Braman.  I was wondering if Kotite did
>this just to see if Braman was paying attention!! :-)  Consider that the
>last time Randall was benched, the coach got fired three days later!!
>Kotite's got guts!!

ESPN was commenting on this the other day.  It seems that Kotite said
after Sunday's game that Randall was going to be the starter against the
Raiders.  At a press conference on Monday, he said McMahon was going to
start.  They think that the order may of come from Braman himself sometime
on Monday.  While I don't think that Kotite is the smartest coach, I can't
believe that he would start a quarterback controversy at this point in the
season.  If in fact Braman is making team decisions, it could be a long
season for the Eagles.  ESPN did not offer any evidence of Braman influence
in the decision.
--
Kevin Schnitzius
kschnitzius@encore.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund)
Subject: Re: Seahawk fan
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 15:18:00 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <BxJ1vD.B4n@acsu.buffalo.edu> v050j5h4@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Steven H Todman) writes:
>
>     Since a poll has been taken of Seahawk Fans, I wanted to be counted.
>
>                                  -Steve (a frustrated fan)

Add one more to the list.

-Eric Jaderlund
 jade@triton.unm.edu
From: nk0s+@andrew.cmu.edu (Brennan Kraje)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,cmu.misc.market
Subject: NEED STEELERS/LIONS TIX
Date: 8 Nov 92 16:30:39 GMT
Organization: Masters student, Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


    I need two (2) tickets to this Sunday's Steelers/Lions game, for my
brother is coming up from Virginia.  Willing to pay top dollar; just
tell me if you have any extra tickets, where they are, and what you want
for them.
    Thanks for your help...

                                                    - Brennan Kraje
From: imes@anaconda.cis.ohio-state.edu (jeffrey imes)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: They might be faking it...
Date: 10 Nov 92 00:18:56 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science

In article <BILLMS.92Nov9105817@dip.eecs.umich.edu> billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>In article <910427m.63.721319824@ace.acadiau.ca> 910427m@ace.acadiau.ca (JASON MATTHEW MCDONALD) writes:
>
>   I was watching the Bengals/Bears game last night on TSN, which was carrying 
[...bulk deleted...]

>   FAKE IT?????  What the hell does FAKE IT mean.  How the HELL to you fake 
>   going on a fourth down?  I don't know, maybe this guy sees something I don'
>   t.  But if you ask me, it's just plain stupidity.
>
>Faking it works quite a bit in that situation.  You come up and give a hard
>count or two, with *no* intention of running a play.  Either you get an
>offsides/encroachment call and a first down, or you lose five on the delay of
>game and punt with little penalty from your 40.  What, you've *never* seen
>this used before?

Also, you can do what U. of Louiville did against OSU early this season.

Line up in three back shotgun (QB and back at each side), snap to QB and then
he pooch kicks.  Good if you want to guarantee no run back since the D thinks
that the O is going for it.  Only works if 1) the QB is also a good punter 
(i.e. Randall Cunningham, Tom Tupa) and 2) if you're somewhere around the 
opponents' 30-40.

===============================================================================
Jeffrey Imes                                            imes@cis.ohio-state.edu
CIS Undergraduate Student	                 "The brain doesn't need blood,
B.S.C.I.S. 3/94					  it just needs to be wet."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan )
Subject: NFC Versus AFC ( Was AFC stinks)
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 04:58:24 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


Is there anything wrong with the statement that the top NFC teams
are much much better than the top AFC teams.

I know that this offends some AFC fans and I did not mean it
that way. But the top NFC teams are just a cut above.

Maybe what goes around comes around and the AFC might dominate
the late 90s. But as of now, the Cowboys, Eagles, Niners and
the Saints and the Vikes do look formidable than the Bills
Steelers and the Dolphins.

S.H
The Purple bleeder.
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Vikes and the Browns
Date: 13 Nov 92 19:11:40 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.Bxo5BG.EHH
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


To all those who sent me particulars regarding the Browns'
mailing list, my heartiest thanx.'

S.H
THE PURPLE PEOPLE  EATERS & THE BROWNS MAKE NFL EXCITING!!!
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 90's and Dallas? Maybe?
Date: 5 Nov 92 20:06:42 GMT
Article-I.D.: gazette.1dbusiINN90g
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Howard Hughes Medical Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <1992Nov5.190134.24515@u.washington.edu> tokuno@carson.u.washington.edu (Ken Tokuno) writes:
>>>From: jasmith@admin1.memst.edu
>>>Subject: 90's and Dallas? Maybe?
>>>Date: 4 Nov 92 13:49:39 -0600
>>       >  This team is young enough to just maybe 
>>       >  become the team of the 90's.  To go down in history be hide the 
>>      >   powerfull teams like Green Bay Packers of the 1960s, the Pittsburgh
>>     >    Steelers of the 1970's, and the Fourty Niners of the 1980's.
>>     >    Let's hear for the inaugural season of the team of the 1990's.
>>     >       The DALLAS COWBOYS the team of the 90's.
>
>Sports Illustrated, Paul Zimmerman to be exact, made this prediction in 1991.


So did Kevin Kiley of TNT, in the summer of 1991.





Ray     GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: barnes@cowboys.esd.sgi.com (James Barnes)
Subject: Re: Does anyone think Atlanta will win?
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 20:53:07 GMT

In article <1dhktoINNgec@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>, david@cats.ucsc.edu (David
Wright) writes:
|> 
|> 
|> With Miller out, and the Atlanta Defense non-existent (worse than
|> Pheonix's),
|> the niners will have the luxurious option of either passing or rushing
|> and
|> hence scoring to their hearts content. Tolliver will *have* to pass,
|> the
|> niners should know it, and the otherwise weak secondary might give us a
|> suprise.  Otherwise it will be a high scoring game on both sides, but
|> the
|> niners will come out on top.
|> 
|> -- 
|> "There is nothing in the marginal conditions that     
|>     distinguish a mountain from a mole hill"            
|>                       Kenneth Boulding                             
|> 
|> 					All comments  are mine---(David Wright) 
|> 						david@cats.ucsc.edu.
As good as the 9ers looked against Phoenix, Atlanta might have a chance.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: richard@smok.demon.co.uk (Richard Clyne)
Subject: 2,000 yds 
Distribution: world
Organization: Richard Clyne (Home System)
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:58:03 +0000


In article <1992Nov10.022604.24945@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> C.Thomas.Eyford.III@dartmouth.edu writes:

>
>In article <1992Nov9.203508.7634@math.ucla.edu>
>rfedkiw@crenshaw.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:
>
>> Well there seems to be only 2 2,00 yd rushers... one from Buffalo.
>> But, how many offensive weapons have had 2,000 yds.
>> Meaning recieving and recievers included.
>> For example, I think Thomas had a couple seasons with 2,000+ !!!!
The NFL list the players that have achieved 2000 yds in a season (including
returns). 45 players have achieved this, mostly in the last 10 years.
Players that have achieved 2000 yds from receptions and rushing are:

1991 Thurmon Thomas  Rush 1407 Receive 631 Total 2038
1988 Roger Craig     Rush 1502 Receive 534 Total 2068
     Eric Dickerson  Rush 1659 Receive 377 Total 2036
     Hershal Walker  Rush 1514 Receive 505 Total 2019
1986 Eric Dickerson  Rush 1821 Receive 205 Total 2026

I havn't got the time to extend this back, I'll post it at the weekend.


>
>How about 1,000 yards rushing and 1,000 yards receiving in the same
>year?  As far as I know, only one player has done that in NFL history -
>Roger Craig, San Fransciso 49ers. 
>

This is correct.

>RL: Tom Eyford                        E-mail: eyford@mac.dartmouth.edu
>
>"So, you'll put down your rock and I'll put down my sword, and we'll
>try to kill each other like civilized people?"  
>                                      -- Westley, _The Princess Bride_  
>
>
--
Richard Clyne
319 Violet Lane, Croydon, Surrey, CR4 4HN. Tel +44 (0)81 686 7159
richard@smok.demon.co.uk (Prefered)    rclyne@cix.compulink.co.uk
From: aa05@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ABDULMALIK A. ALHUSSEINI)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Lin Elliot improving?
Date: 10 Nov 92 04:55:37 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <2828@devnull.mpd.tandem.com>, dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch) writ
es:
>An important development for the Cowboys:  after missing his first two
>attempts against the Eagles, Lin Elliot has made seven straight field goals,
>including two which were taken back (both on penalties).  His kicks in the
>Detroit game all looked solid.  I hope he has finally gained some form and
>will continue kicking like this the rest of the season!
>
>Daniel Welch
>
    Amen.

    Malik.....
From: whitesel@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Daniel Whitesell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Boomer is Ultimate Team Player.........NOT!
Keywords: Boomer had help early in his carrer.
Date: 12 Nov 92 22:29:02 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

In article <1992Nov12.132624.613@cbnews.cb.att.com> cfh@cbnews.cb.att.com (chuck.himmelspach) writes:
>The local newspaper this morning said that Boomer doesn't want to be
>involved in a Cincinnati rebuilding effort. He doesn't want to stick
>around to mentor any up and coming QB (read David Klingler(sp?)). I've

This is sad but true.  Has Boomer forgoten the few years that Ken Anderson
sat the bench at the end of his carrer mentoring him.

>read lots of quotes from Boomer during his career at Cincy and he's always
>struck me as one selfish, whining (only looking out for #1, baby) player. 
>I can't help but wonder how his latest comments will affect his teammates' 
>performance in support of him.
>
>Well, if Boomer would become available, I'm sure old Wicky Wacky down in
>Tampa would want him.

Does Tampa have anything Cincy needs?  DB or WR.
I don't believe boomer will go free.

>
>Comments?
>
>Der Himmel


whitesel@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dan Whitesell)
        ___      ______  __      __  ________   ______   __        ________  __
GO     / _ \    / ____/ /  |    / / / ____  /  / ___  / / /       / ____  / / /
      / / \ \  / /     / | |   / / / /   /_/  / /  / / / /       / /   /_/ / / 
     / /__/ / / /___  / /| |  / / / / _____  / /__/ / / /       / /_____  / /
    / _  __/ / ____/ / / | | / / / / /_  _/ / ___  / / /       / ____  / / /
   / / \ \  / /     / /  | |/ / / /   / /  / /  / / / /   __  __    / / /_/
  / /__/ / / /___  / /   | | / / /___/ /  / /  / / / /___/ / / /___/ / __
 /______/ /_____/ /_/    |__/ /_______/  /_/  /_/ /_______/ /_______/ /_/
=========================================================================
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Vikings game
Date: 9 Nov 1992 18:28:28 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

>	It was never close!  The Vikings line(both sides of the ball) dominated
>the game.  Terry Allen and Roger Craig had great days rushing and Gannon had 
>another decent day passing.  I may be biased but THE VIKES ARE NO FLUKE!
>Houston is dead meat.
>			
   Actually, Allen did have a great day rushing 14-84, but Craig was only
   3-12. However Craig scored two TDs, much to the chagrin of all FFL owners
   of Allen (can you say "irritation"). My question to Viking fans in the
   know, is Craig gonna be the TD man 'cause Allen is fumbling so much. 
   Please tell me no...

   --salty
From: kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Tough loss for the Chargers
Date: 9 Nov 92 17:24:26 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: what.. me.. organized?



SAN DIEGO 14  CHIEFS 16


Man o' man.. that was a *tough* loss to take. SD came back from 
13-0 down in the 1st half to take a 14-13 lead in the 4th Q, and 
couldn't hang on for victory.

SD played miserably in the 1st half. Derrick Thomas went wild;
4 sacks, 2 forced fumbles. They blocked him well in the 2nd half 
though. Penalties hurt SD in the 1st half. A 49 yd TD bomb was
called back for holding. The defense was time and again put in lousy
field position, but they played very well to hold KC to only
13 pts [with considerable help from Marty].

SD scored on a TD pass to TE Walker [who dropped 4 other passes that
went his way], and a TD run by Butts. In the 4th Q, with a 14-13 lead,
SD was driving on the KC 45. Butts got hurt [cramps and will be back
next week] and on a 3rd and 1, they missed Bernstine. Harmon is not a
power runner. He didnt make the 1st down, and they punted. 

KC seemed to get every break in the game. SD lost WR Nate Lewis &
DE Grossman to injuries. They were already without RB Bernstine, 
and CB Blaylock for the entire game.

Late in the game, KC got yet another break. A Krieg pass was tipped
by Mims, it bounced high up the air and landed in the hands of a KC WR!
That set up a 25 yd pass and the winning FG.

Highlights;

o Humphries was 20 of 35 for 296 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT.

o Harmon was sensational. He had 100+ yds catching.

o DT Chris Mims had another good game.


I said this after the 1st loss to KC, and I will say it again. 
KC will NOT make it to the SuperBowl this year. They s**t lucky
to win yesterday.

Next week, at Cleveland. Two solid defenses. Should be a struggle.


_______________________________________________________
| Prashanth                    |                      |
| U. of California @ San Diego | prash@raman.ucsd.edu |
#######################################################
From: dsj@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Daniel Scott Janecek)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Terry Allen
Date: 10 Nov 1992 23:08:18 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: dsj@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: dsj@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

> 
> 	Well, in the games I have seen, usally Allen gets the ball between
> 	the 20's and Green sometimes pulls Allen when the Vikes get to the
> 	goal line, but Allen does have something like 7 TD's. Its pretty
> 	strange tho, even when Allen is having a great game, Craig is 
> 	always in there. I wonder, but I dont have alot of info here in
> 	Wisconsin....
> 

	According to the Viking Update I receive weekly (I am forced
to get this living in WI and only hearing about the Packers), Allen
and Craig pull each other out of the game. Dennis Green said there is
no set amount of carries, but if Allen wants to come in, he can come
in. They are playing the 'team' concept to the max. If Allen feels
tired, he can call Craig in and vice versa. But, also on the other
hand (as Craig put it) 'Why should one of us come out if we are on a
roll' (to paraphrase). I feel that the reason Craig has been getting
most of the carries is that Allen LATELY has been carring the ball
close to the goal line and is prolly tired. So, for the best of the
team, they bring in Craig, who is refreshed to dive in. Terry Allen
does have 7 rushing TDS (along with 1 receiving), and if you look at
the games, the same goes for why Allen was getting alot of the goal
line carries, Craig got them down there quite often (on screens and
runs). 


				dan
From: gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles #1 Quarterback
Date: 10 Nov 92 13:28:46 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <Nov.9.15.29.45.1992.13475@gandalf.rutgers.edu>, bstuart@gandalf.rutg
ers.edu (Ben Stuart) writes:
>I was just curious.  For the rest of you Eagle fans out there, who
>would you rather have starting?  I know next week is only Green Bay,
>but their defense could give Randall the confidence he needs.  On the
>other hand, Jimmy Mac earned a starting job through his leadership
>against the Raiders and a decent showing coming off the bench cold in
>the Dallas game (allbeit with modest numbers).
>
>And for the non-Eagle fans, who deserves the job?
>
>Ben
>
Cunningham definitely!  Kotite needs to design an offense around the strengths
of his players.  It was publicized how Walker likes to take the ball deep in
the backfield, get the momentum going, and then just bulldoze through the
line.  This was working on the beginning of the year and is how the running
game should be designed.  Cunningham's head problems aside, put more bootlegs
in, let him do what he does best.  Just as Jimmy Mac is more of a pocket
passer and shouldn't be forced into many bootlegs, don't force Cunningham into
being a pocket passer.
-- 

------------------------
|   Gail A. Fullman    |
|   Manager - ADMO     |
|   Ext. 83113         |
------------------------
Organization: Senior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA