HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: carrato@acsu.buffalo.edu (Michael Carrato)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills a Bust? (WAR is HELL)
Date: 29 Dec 92 09:51:39 GMT
Organization: UB

jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:

> (etc. etc. we've seen it 16 times so why repeat it?)

John's favorite teams:

1) Niners (of course)
2) Whoever plays the Bills

Does that week 2 loss still bother you, John? Lighten up! Your 
Niners will probably romp while the only team who has their number
will drown in a pool of injuries. Looks like an easy ride to the
championship for your beloved team now that the Bills are decimated...

Mike C
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood)
Subject: POOL - Picks for Week #17 -- DUE SATURDAY -- ONLY POSTING!!!!!!! ***
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 19:22:48 GMT


This is the only posting!  I'm leaving town tomorrow!

Week 17
-------

PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK THE FORM BEFORE MAILING IT!

Mail this form to davewood@cs.colorado.edu with the word "picks" in the
subject line.  Be sure to choose one and only one team for each game.  Mark
your choice with an 'x' in the appropriate box.  Put your initials after the
word "Initials:" (ON THE SAME LINE!) at the bottom of the form.  If you have
questions about this form, send them with the subject "fbproblem."  If you
still need to sign up, YOU MUST SEND A SEPARATE MESSAGE with the word
"signup" in the subject line.  Do not reply to this message unless it is to
send in your picks.  See the Rules/Signup post for more information.

WEIGHTS: Assign 10 points to 4 different games.
	 Assign  7 points to 5 different games.
	 Assign  5 points to 5 different games.

This form is due at 9:30am PST (4:30pm GMT) on Saturday, Dec 26.  NO EXCEPTIONS!

DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE!

 WT  Away                       Home
*------------------------------------------------*
[  ] [ ] New Orleans		[ ] NY Jets      
[  ] [ ] LA Raiders		[ ] Washington    
[  ] [ ] Green Bay		[ ] Minnesota      
[  ] [ ] NY Giants		[ ] Philadelphia   
[  ] [ ] Cleveland		[ ] Pittsburgh     
[  ] [ ] Denver			[ ] Kansas City       
[  ] [ ] Indianapolis		[ ] Cincinnati  
[  ] [ ] Miami			[ ] New England        
[  ] [ ] Atlanta		[ ] LA Rams          
[  ] [ ] Chicago		[ ] Dallas           
[  ] [ ] Tampa Bay		[ ] Phoenix        
[  ] [ ] San Diego		[ ] Seattle        
[  ] [ ] Buffalo		[ ] Houston          
[  ] [ ] Detroit		[ ] San Francisco    

Initials: 

DID YOU PUT YOUR INITIALS ON THE SAME LINE AS THE WORD INITIALS???  PLEASE DO!
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Rex Wood -- davewood@cs.colorado.edu -- University of Colorado at Boulder
  BRONCOS!!        R.S.F.P. Internet Football Pool Organizer        BRONCOS!!
                            Owner, Boulder Houlders
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: Niners Win (Montana is Back - I hope)
Organization: Gizmonic Institute - Home of the "Big G Burger"
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 23:35:11 GMT

<C01pu4.6I8@Novell.COM> dtokarew@tokafew.Doc.Provo.Novell.COM (Deb Tokarewich) :
><1992Dec29.224732.28016@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
>> <1992Dec29.051026.12084@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:
>> >FINAL:  Niners  24  Lions  6
>> >Montana stats:  12/15  126 yds  2 TDs
>> >Young stats:  12/18  153 yds  0 TDs
...
>I hope you're not seriously trying to compare Montana's two measley  
>quarters in a meaningless (and not very challenging) game with anyone  
>else's complete season, are you? No one would really try to put that  
>across as logical, would they?
>
>> Also better than that other QB who played the first two quarters.  You
>> know, the one being considered for MVP.
>
>OK, OK, I'm convinced...give Joe the MVP. Y'know, you can have any opinion  
>you want about anyone--Montana, Young, the guy down the street, anyone.  
>"Free country" and all that. But the obvious sour grapes (against every  
>other breathing QB, but especially Young) that's evident in some of these  
>Joe-For-Sainthood posts I've been reading today is enough to set one's  
>teeth on edge.

Gack!  Sir, you're sadly mistaken.  I'm no Joe Montana fan.  If you'd read
any of the 'MVP' thread you'd recognize the humor in my comment.


Gordon
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jjungbau@luke.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer)
Subject: TV  (was Re: 'Twas NBC Re: Raiders vs. Redskins...)
Organization: Washington State University, Pullman
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 06:19:43 GMT

In article <1hm403INNng9@agate.berkeley.edu> grantham@beirut.berkeley.edu (Jon Grantham) writes:
>kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) wrote:
>>No, it was CBS. Check again.
>
>No, it was NBC.  YOU check again.

OK, before this goes on at infinitum, it was NBC.  Except for ABC MNF, regular
season coverage is governed by the following rule: CBS carries games in which
the road team is from the NFC, and NBC carries games in which the road team is
from the AFC.  Road team --> Raiders --> AFC --> NBC.

Now, a different question:  Is ABC covering the upcoming Saturday games?
Specifically, the Vikes-Skins game?

Jim 
-- 
Jim Jungbauer               | Go Vikings, North Stars, Twins, Cougars!
jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu  | 
EECS Department             | "Nice move by Bellows... big drive... SCORES!"
Washington State University |    -- Mike Emrick, 1991 Norris Division Finals
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dan Reeves is gone!
Date: 29 Dec 92 20:12:49 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <spork.725655592@camelot> spork@camelot.bradley.edu (Richard Izzo) writes:
>
>
>	Why would they get rid of Flores?  If the Seahawks fired Flores,
>they'd be making the gravest mistake.  He inherited a lousy team.  It'd
>be like firing Tom Landry in 1960 for not winning a game.

Well they can't fire Flore because "they" are Flores... he's the President
of the team.  I think what happened was that their head coach left/was fired
suddenly in the off season and Flores was forced to extend his role from
President to Head Coach.  I don't think this was something he wanted.

They aren't THAT bad a team, they just need direction...

>
>
>	The best places for Reeves might be the Giants, where he can 
>rebuild the team from scratch (like Parcells did in '83), or maybe the
>Lions are cranky enough at Fontes.  You never know.  What WOULD be 
>hilarious would be Reeves chucked it all and took over a WLAF team when 
>they get back into operation next year.

Well GIANTS would be a good choice but again if George Young wouldn't give
a proven coach like Bill Parcells additional responsibilities (which ended
ultimately with Parcells' quitting), I can't see them giving Reeves what he
wants. Also, Parcells didn't really build the team in '83... when he started
as head coach, he already had Phil Simms, LT, Harry Carsons and George Martin.
George Young (GIANTS G.M.) built the team... Parcells walked into a good
situation and was able to do a lot with what he was given (nit-picking, I
know...)

>
>rich.

satish nair
ray is gone!


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
Subject: Is there one HONEST Bills fan?
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 22:04:21 GMT

FACTS:  The FAT LADY CHOKED and the DA BILLS came back
to win the greatest come from behind game in  
NFL HISTORY. 38-41

FACTS:  Was there ANYONE out there that really thought
the Bills could come back and win it after they were
down 35-3? How many of you Bills fans were thinking
"OH NO!" "Please FOOTBALLS GODS, do something!".

I enjoyed the game and the outcome on this game to me,
HONESTLY, was one of indifference.  I was rooting for
good plays and as the game started, the Oilers were in
command. In the second half, the tide turned and again,
I was rooting for good plays. Da Bills were the victors
in the 2nd half.  

FACTS:  Beebe stepped out of bounds and it was not
called and he ran in for a TD. Although this COULD HAVE
been the game for the Oilers, IMHO, I believe Da Bills
WOULD HAVE found a way to win this one. 
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Re: Steelers half-time, final scores with different QBs
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 18:04:46 GMT

Conrad Poelman <conradp+@CMU.EDU> writes:
>Where could I find the half-time and final scores of this season's and
>last season's Steelers games, hopefully with an indication of who played
>QB during the game?  

In the sports sections of last year's Monday newspapers, all of which
can be found, probably in microfilm form, at big libraries such as the
ones at Carnegie Mellon University.

>I have this theory about [...]

Dinosaurs?  I know!  They're thin at one end, much much thicker
in the middle, and thin again at the other end.



--Gidi

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rrleck@custer.uucp (bob leck)
Subject: Re: Buffalo SuperBowl (I love these predictions!)
Organization: Exxon
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 18:43:59 GMT

In article <BzMMs3.5My@acsu.buffalo.edu> v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:
>In article <1992Dec21.085931.28957@math.ucla.edu>, rfedkiw@olympic.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes...
>>Let's see Buffalo beat: San Fran, N.O., Pitt, Miami(split)...all Superbowl
>>contenders.
>>The only other serious contender is Dallas. But if they beat San Fran
>>and N.O., I would assume that they 'could' beat Dallas.
>> 
>>They lost to the Raiders. And split with Miami, Jets, Indy.
>>None of these teams will be played again, except possibly Miami.
>> 
>
>The only thing you forgot Ron  was to add undefeated seasons against
>the NFC in 1993.
>
>Bruce, a BIlls fan. (way to go Buffalo, all the way to the Super Bowl)
>
>>Bills History:
>>1988 season: Division
>>1989 season: Division
>>1990 season: Division, AFC Champion
>>1991 season: Division, AFC Champion
>>and
>>1992 season: Division, AFC Champion, Superbowl
>>1993 season: Division, AFC Champion, Superbowl
>>1994 season: Division, AFC Champion, Superbowl, Undefeated 19-0
>>1995 season: Division, AFC Champion, Superbowl, Undefeated 19-0
>> 
>>How's that for the prediction.
>> 
>>And Pitt will go:
>>1992 season: 10-6 
>>1993 season:  7-9
>>1994 season:  4-12
>>1995 season:  1-15
>>1996 season:  0-16
>>1997 season:  0-16
>>1998 season:  0-16
>>1999 season:  0-16
>>2000 season:  0-16, fold at end of year, will move to Japan   
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>--
>>Ron Fedkiw (rfedkiw@joshua.math.ucla.edu)
>> 
>>The meek shall inherit the Earth. The rest of us are going to the stars.

Sorry Ron. Buffalo has seen their best days this season. Houston has their number. You obviously do not make a living at making predictions. Maybe next year.

GO OILERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! All the way to Pasadena..
From: carrato@acsu.buffalo.edu (Michael Carrato)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Wimping Out
Date: 22 Dec 92 15:37:47 GMT
Organization: UB


Can you believe Siefert is playing his THIRD STRING quarterback
Sunday? Sheez, he's as bad as Marv Levy!

:-)

(probably 3/4 of the net will not see this post because the title
"Wimping out" is still in their kill files from last year...)

Mike
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: msl@cv.hp.com (Mark Laventhal )
Subject: Re: "IT WAS TWENTY YEARS AGO TODAY..."
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.9 PL6]
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 23:47:35 GMT

Louis Nedz (lwn@sei.cmu.edu) wrote:
> 
>      December 23 1972, Three River Stadium. The first round of the
> AFC Playoffs. The Oakland Raiders had taken lead over the Pittsburgh
> Steelers with little time left on the clock. The Steelers tried desperately
> to move the ball down field into scoring range but seemed to stall out 
> in thier own territory as it was 4th and ten, 19 seconds showing on the
> clock.   Terry Bradshaw dropped back to pass, the Raiders were blitzing,
> Bradshaw avoids oncoming tacklers and fires the ball down field,   as
> Frenchy Fuqua lunges for the ball he collides with DB Jack Tatum who 
> deffects the ball back up field  where out of nowhere  Franco Harris
> scoops it up inches from the ground and heads toward the endzone  and
> a Pittsburgh Steeler Dynasty. 
>      Those were the good old days. The Steelers went on to win 4 SUPER
> BOWLS in six years and become on of the greatest teams in NFL history.
> 
>      Well it's 1992 and the Steelers are once again heading into the
> playoffs. Wouldn't it be nice to see history repeat itself?
> 
>        GO STEELERS!!!
> 

Sorry to burst your balloon, but after beating the Raiders, the Steelers
proceeded to lose in the AFC title game the next week to the (undefeated)
Miami Dolphins, who went on to win the Super Bowl.  The Dolphins followed 
that up with a second Super Bowl win the following year.  So it was a
couple of years before the first of the Steeler Super Bowl wins.

Mark Laventhal
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit)
Subject: Re: Are the Falcons really that lame?
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 23:55:56 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:

>I'll be in row 3, 50 yard line! :-) I won't give you the section,
>but I am easy to spot. Just look for the MANLY MAN in red! :-)

Yeah, I suppose a MANLY MAN would be easy to spot at Candlestick :^)

Sorry, just couldn't let that pass,

			-Ron
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: eebonar@sn01.sncc.lsu.edu (Dave Bonar)
Subject: Pro Bowl
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4   
Reply-To: eebonar@sn01.sncc.lsu.edu
Organization: News and Views from LSU
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 22:25:22 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host-[nntpd-12029]: sn01.sncc.lsu.edu


	Due to the Christmas holidays I missed seeing a list of who made the
Pro Bowl this year.  If someone has the list I'd love a copy (via email please,
the majority of people on the newsgroup have seen the list I'm sure).

Dave
__________
Dave Bonar
eebonar@lsuvax.sncc.lsu.edu
__________

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett)
Subject: Dallas: Curvin Richards
Organization: Abode Computer Systems
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 16:49:27 GMT

I can't believe that Jimmy Johnson cut Curvin Richards! What type of game does
Johnson expect the guy to have when he has hardly played at all during the
season? They didn't really give him much of a chance. I know he was injured at
the beginning of the season (lacerated kidney) and didn't get to play then,
but even when the Cowboys had the game locked up they still left Emmitt in
close to the end.

If he is letting him go because of an attitude in practice that would be
different. But, then again, what kind of attitude can you have at practice
when you know you aren't going to play?

Anyway, I think it was a bad move on the part of the Cowboys.

Eric

-- 

		Internet: eric@abode.ttank.com
		    uucp: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!wvus!abode!eric

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson)
Subject: Re: Vikings comments
Reply-To: bergerson@mayo.edu
Organization: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 21:21:32 GMT




In article <1992Dec29.211530.11054@bmw.mayo.edu>, bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson) writes:
->Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
->From: bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson)
->Subject: Re: Vikings comments
->Reply-To: bergerson@mayo.edu
->
->
->
->
->
->In article <27000195@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>, boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell) writes:
->->From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
->->Subject: Re: Vikings comments
->->Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
->->
->->Hey Chad, 
->->
->->Just got your private email.  Really loved it buddy.  I am sorry that I can 
->->not take you up on your sweet offer.  The thought of fucking you (I assume
->->your 'Fuck You' statement was an offer) just does not turn me on.  Sorry,
->->I don't think you are my type buddy.  However, my uncle has a sheep that may
->->be interested if you promise to be gentle.
->->
->->
->->************************************************
->->* Donald Boell - Hewlett Packard               *
->->*                                              *
->->* When you're chewing on life's gristle        *
->->* Don't grumble, give a whistle - Monty Python *
->->*                                 Life of Brian*
->->************************************************
->->
->->
->->
->
->you sound like a real loser to me, why don't you just go away......
->

AND, there was nothing sexual intended, queer boy.  I'm sure that some of the 
other people that came to my defense about the sexist remark wish that morons
like you would just leave us alone.

Would someone like to discuss football now ????!!!!!


--
*******************************************************************************
Chad D. Bergerson                            Internet: bergerson@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic                                  Voice: (507) 255-7567
200 First Street SW                          FAX: (507) 255-5484
Mail Stop 2D-334 STM            "In my dream I was drowning my sorrows  
Rochester, MN  55905             But my sorrows they learned to swim..." - U2
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes)
Subject: Re: Deion Sanders
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 03:46:44 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NARC Atlanta
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1.3 PL5

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!)
Subject: Re: San Diego in playoffs?????
Organization: Yale University
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 23:01:33 GMT

In article <1992Dec21.172551.24298@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:
>From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
>Subject: Re: San Diego in playoffs?????
>Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:25:51 GMT
>In article <Adriene_Nazaretian.76.0@QM.cis.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!) writes:
>>True? 
>>
>>Could this be the only team to start 0-4 and make it?  Anyone go 0-3 and 
>>make the playoffs?  Just wonderin'
>>
>>A
>
>Yes my Dear ALN, the first team EVER to do it! SNIFF! SNIFF!,
>I have a cold! 
>-- 

YOU'RE SICK! NO, I mean SICK!   I know you love it when I net.insult you!

Anyone go 0-3 and make the playoffs?
Adriene
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson)
Subject: Re: VIKINGS WIN!!! 6-3
Reply-To: bergerson@mayo.edu
Organization: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 17:41:47 GMT


->You held a Neil O'Donnel'less Steelers to 3 points, big deal.  We (The Packers)
->held them to seven earlier this year, with Neil.  The Steelers aren't exactly a
->high powered offense, when you get to the playoffs you'll probably be facing
->the Redskins offense.  Tell you what, 6 points won't win the game.
->
->-Chris C.
->

You Packer fans are a riot.  The Skins didn't even score a TD against the
Vikes earlier this year.  Maybe you should all write letters to Santa wishing
to be in the playoffs.  :^)

--
*******************************************************************************
Chad D. Bergerson                            Internet: bergerson@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic                                  Voice: (507) 255-7567
200 First Street SW                          FAX: (507) 255-5484
Mail Stop 2D-334 STM            "In my dream I was drowning my sorrows  
Rochester, MN  55905             But my sorrows they learned to swim..." - U2
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
Subject: SKINS WIN
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 20:49:22 GMT

FINAL SCORE:  VIKINGS   7   REDSKINGS   24

The Vikings who made a great run this year, but playoff 
experience does count for something. I for one am NOT surprised 
that the SKINS came through. I am suprised to see this Brian 
Mitchell control the game with his running. Byner also contributed, 
as well as Clark, Monk, but Kudos to Rypien for showing up 
the doubters. Mitchell was the Redskins KEY in this game IMHO, 
209 combined yards for the day! As Coach Green said after the
game, "My hats off to the Redskins....", I concur!

Next weeks game between the Redskins and the Niners should be
a classic. I just hope the outcome is relied on in good football 
and not won by luck. :-)  If the Skins can play as good or
better against the Niners, then the Niners cannot afford to
make any mistakes.
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: asgari@tac30.net.com (Asgari Roger)
Subject: RUSHING RECORDS
Organization: Network Equipment Technologies, Redwood City
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 18:32:31 GMT




                I would appreciate it if someone would kindly list the 
        top rushing career leaders in the NFL(todate)...
                        
                THANKYOU   
                                RA




                GO COWBOYS!!!
From: hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org (Huett Bishop)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Raiders vs. Redskins (CBS' unprofessionalism)
Date: 29 Dec 92 16:11:11 GMT
Organization: Tandem Telecommunications Systems Inc.

In article <28DEC199218241909@vill.edu> 187701458@vill.edu writes:
>In article <1992Dec28.195823.10761@ttsi.lonestar.org>, hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org (Huett Bishop) writes...
>	hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org writes........
>> 
>>Unbiased? HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
>> 
>>Just watch Monday Night Football's pre-game, it is very easy to see which
>>team Frank, Al, and Dan want to win.
>> 
>>When the Cowboys played Philly (game 2) these guys were sucking butt on
                                 ^^^^^^^
The second game of the series. Not the year. 

My mistake on the Network. It was a Sunday game, on CBS. Ditto comments
on Madden, Summerall.
	

>Defense at Aikman when the latter was penalized for intentional grounding, the 
>holes Walker rushed through etc. The Cowboys kicking butt in that game?
>Hardly. Final score 31 - 7. 

Yes kicking butt in the second of the 2 games. Where was this minister of 
defence when Emmitt Smith rushed for what 163 yds. And where was the great
Hershel? or Sir Randall? Riding the pine if I remember correctly.


Anyway my point being that the networks are definitely biased, and hate it
when "their" team does badly.

>
>		Jagdeep Sahni
>		A Hard Hitting, Trash Talking, Philadelphia Eagles Fan
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You got that right.

>		Herbert, watch out for Gang Green!!!		

+--------------------------------------+
|Huett Bishop                          |
| Tandem Telecommuncations Systems Inc.|
|Dallas, TX                            |
|                                      |
|Go Cowboys!!                          |
|                                      |
|email: hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org      |
+--------------------------------------+
From: donald@dswalker.EBay.Sun.COM (Don Walker)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: my playoff predictions
Date: 4 Jan 1993 00:33:03 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: donald@dswalker.EBay.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: dswalker.ebay.sun.com

half right. Better luck next week.

GO CHARGERS