HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Subject: Re: Help. Please?
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 11:17:21 GMT

In article <1992Sep7.012702.9315@bsu-ucs.uucp> 01ksdavis@bsu-ucs.uucp writes:
>	BTW-during the talk, I found out she is in one of my classes.  As a 
>matter of fact, I sat next to her last Thursday.  I did have trouble taking down
>notes for some reason.
>
>	Help!  Please?  Anybody else been here, know what I am talking about, or
>is here right now?  What are you/ did you do about something like this.
>
>	She has hurt me before.  Really bad.  Yet, like some demented moth, I
>fly suicidally towards the flame.

After class (while everyone is still there) take her in your arms, pressing
your bodies tight against one another and give her a long and passionate kiss.
Several minutes later, after you're both done kissing, say to her "If you want
more where that came from, you know where to call me."

This, Mr. Moth, will truly test your resolve in buzzing the old flame.
From: taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Blind dates scare me!
Date: 15 Sep 92 17:24:25 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki, Finland

In <14609@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>It seems to me that a blind date is usually set up by someone else.  Usually
>a friend or relative.  Perhaps you need to clue in your friends on the type
>of woman that you're interested in.

Is it a blind date when you meet someone first on the net and later in
person?  What kind of experiences do you net-people have about such
dates?

Juha
-- 
Juha Taina | taina@cs.helsinki.fi | Phone: +358-0-708-4247
From: rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Wolf Park? (was Re: Desperation)
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 21:25:41 MDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Wild Rose Refugee Camp

kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:

> >kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Me) writes:
> >>Wolves are mondo cool. Wolf puppies are the cutest, most cuddly critters
> 
> rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink) writes:
> 
> >Yeah, wolf pups *are* mondo cool, but I could never understand why
> >they wanted to chew on my belt buckle.  
> 
> Just a wolfy thing, I expect.  You wouldn't understand. :-)
> 
> >Alas, the knockout blonde grad assistant that worked there didn't
> >have any similar interest :-) 
> 
> Oh, bummer.  Did you nibble at the corners of her mouth?

*Her* mouth?  Oh.  I was trying to suckup to the wolf pups first :-)
Y'know, like trying to get along with your date's pet yap dog.

yip yip. yip yip yip. yip yip.  yip yip yip.  OW!!  <whack!>

-- Ray
From: keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: General topic to break the monotony
Date: 10 Sep 92 18:00:36 GMT
Organization: California-Nevada Methodist Homes

In article <flrn61f@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
>This might sound cruel but....
>In Illinois yesterday, a plane carrying skydivers crashed.
>My only question is, why didn't they jump out?
>r.

Oh rON!  This was absolutely brilliant!  I, too, heard about
the crash, and although it was a sad thing, I, along with a
lot of other people I'm sure, completely missed this obvious
question.
Thanks a lot.
--Keith

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: Tallllll women....
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 12:43:06 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <84@cnmhnet.UUCP> keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard) writes:
>OK.  I just want to understand WHAT is the big attraction in
>Talllll women?  I mean, They have these long legs that get in 
>they way, and when they get just a little age on them [late
>20's and up], their butts become flat.  So you have this tall
>amazon of a woman, with a flat butt.....

You're really short, aren't you.
r.
ps- give me all your tall women, then! :)
From: taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Irish ways
Date: 11 Sep 92 12:30:47 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki, Finland

In <ewillims.716211206@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:

>>How about telling us about Ireland and the Irish ways?  I'm sure that
>>a lot of people are interested.

>	Sure!  What do you want to know exactly?

Gee, I never thought that far!  Hmm... Culture, food, drinks, spare
time, reasons to stay single in Ireland, reasons *not* to stay single in
Ireland, Gnomes, timetables that are always wrong, landscape...

The list could go forever... I guess you had better just tell something.

Juha

-- 
Juha Taina | taina@cs.helsinki.fi | Phone: +358-0-708-4247
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart)
Subject: Re: Can you accept criticism ? (was Re: Why lurkers lurk ...)
Organization: my opinions only
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 22:42:44 GMT

In article <1992Sep4.190944.12747@mks.com> fredw@mks.com (Fred Walter)
writes:

>A personal pet peeve of mine is gossip. Every so often I hear from friends
>of mine what their friends (people who don't know me well, or, even more
>amusing, people who don't know me at all, people who have never even met me)
>say about me.

I'm more amused by it than anything else.

A few days ago, about an hour into our first conversation, a woman
exlaimed, "Oh!  You're THAT Seth!"

I guess I'm just (in)famous.

Seth		sethb@fid.morgan.com
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Intelligence vs Smart Alec (Was: Various ramblings...)
Date: 8 Sep 92 18:54:44 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <MARTINC.92Sep6184723@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>In article <1992Sep6.030007.5552@csi.uottawa.ca> misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel) writes:
>
>      Try closing the window.  That should provide draught relief.  But
>   don't you spell it "draft" in the U.S.A.?  :-)
>
>Nope, we haven't had a draft since the mid 70's.

Yes we have.  Why just last weekend I told this guy, "Give me a draft", and
he did.

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira     | Auspex Systems | "Auspex does not share my opinions.  |
| johnf@auspex.com | Santa Clara CA |  So Why am I still working here?"    |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams)
Subject: Re: Desperation (was Re: Commitment--The C-word?)
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 07:50:09 GMT

In <1992Sep9.071115.446@dmpe.csiro.au> solnorda@dmpe.csiro.au (Chris Solnordal) writes:

>ewilliams.71545301@unix1.tcd.ie writes:

>>	Absolutely!  Yet another facet of the "the minute you've got an
>>SO, you get more passes from other girls/guys than you've ever had before
>>in your life" syndrome.  To coin a popular phrase, it's "strange but true".
>>Personally, I think it is because you are glowing with happiness and 
>>that warmth surrounding you attracts others too.  A friend of mine insists
>>that it is because you are releasing more pheronomes (sp?) [sexual hormones
>>that are smelt subliminally by others].  It could be a combination of both.

>A friend of mine insists that it's because when you're going out with
>someone, there's a much greater chance that you've just had sex :-)  This 
>then attracts potential partners in a big way - especially if it was quite
>recent !!

>Don't know how true it is, but it sounds reasonable to me :-)


	Well, this would further support the theory about the sexual
hormones (pheronomes).  Presumably, you would be releasing them in
abundance if you have just had sex and therefore would attract others
to the smell without them realising why.  Moose do it!  Why do you 
think theyr put musk in perfumes and aftershaves! ;>
 
    ____________________________________________________________________
    |   Emma Williams            | Folk sover ellers ikke godt op      |
    |   ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie    | ad en sultan tiger!                 |
    |				 |    Steen og Stoffer :->             |
    |____________________________|_____________________________________|

>Chris
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: michele@dgbt.doc.ca (Michele Guillet)
Subject: Re: Las Vegas Revisited
Keywords: Ick, yuk, ptooie
Organization: The Communications Research Centre
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 01:47:21 GMT

In article <1992Sep13.095109.10266@walter.cray.com> cfg@cray.com (Cindy Glass) writes:
>In article <1992Sep12.173754.23870@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>>In article <1992Sep11.190637.2284@u.washington.edu> intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
>>>He's at it again!  Anybody else get another email from Veeeeegas?
>>>
>>>Angelwing - why me?
>>
>>He asked me if I wanted to be his penpal. 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Yes - "RANDY - Randy" has struck again - complete with details
>of his relationship with his SO - problems of her divorce and 
>a GIF!
>
>Again - parts of it were a form letter - 'what a guy'!
>
Glad to know I am not the only one.



-- 
Michele Guillet 			The Communications Research Centre 
3701 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA, K2H 8S2	tel:613-998-2384
Internet: michele@dgbt.doc.ca	
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: carl@sscl.uwo.ca (Carl Kaufmann)
Subject: Re: "We're all normal here"
Organization: Soc.Sci.Comp.Lab., U.West.Ont.
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 01:10:17 GMT

In article <lbcbkiINN3ac@news.bbn.com>, dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
> In article <1992Sep15.182146.11205@cs.yale.edu> loosemore-sandra@CS.YALE.EDU (Sandra Loosemore) writes:
>>martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>>
>>   Oh, Sandra, you know all the angles.
>>
>>Is that a complement?  I still have another trig up my sleeve too.
>>And, don't you like the divergence of this thread from its original
>>topic?
> 
> I guess Charlie just isn't the right poisson to discuss normality.  But
> I wouldn't want to gauss who around here is.  
> 
> (Ugh.  Next time I'll leave this gamma to somebody else.  I'll be lucky 
> if .5% of the readership cauchy's all these references.)

As one statistician to another, I'll beta that you forgot that I read
soc.singles with great frequency.

"Statisticians do it with random deviates." :-)

CatGuy
*****************************************************************************
* See how the heart reaches *  Carl Kaufmann   * No one has to do anything, *
* out instinctively, for no * Soc.Sci.Comp.Lab * except bear consequences.  *
* reason but to touch.      *    U.West.Ont    *                            *
*       -Kate Bush          * carl@sscl.uwo.ca *       -Me                  *
*****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex,alt.romance
From: misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel)
Subject: Re: Nice Guys?
Followup-To: soc.singles
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, University of Ottawa
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 20:39:39 GMT

In article <jxvnggm.slf@netcom.com>, slf@netcom.com (Sharon Fisher) writes:

> Sigh.  School just started again, didn't it?
>
> No, it is not true that women, in general, prefer assholes.
>
> Women, in general, prefer guys with self-confidence.
>
> Unfortunately, assholes are generally pretty self-confident.
>
> As a wise woman friend of mine once said (meaning, "I can't remember
> her name"), "Being *nice* is not enough."  Okay, fine, you're *nice*.
> But you also need to be *interesting*.  

   Pooh.

misrael@csi.uottawa.ca			Mark Israel
Sunbeams brightly play, where Fancy's fair pavilion once is pight.
From: bdboyle@erenj.com (Bryan D. Boyle)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Help. Please?
Date: 15 Sep 92 17:33:36 GMT
Organization: The world of imagination...

In article <1992Sep7.111721.7030@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>In article <1992Sep7.012702.9315@bsu-ucs.uucp> 01ksdavis@bsu-ucs.uucp writes:
>>
>> (some really good stuff deleted....)
>>
>>	She has hurt me before.  Really bad.  Yet, like some demented moth, I
>>fly suicidally towards the flame.
>
>After class (while everyone is still there) take her in your arms, pressing
>your bodies tight against one another and give her a long and passionate kiss.
>Several minutes later, after you're both done kissing, say to her "If you want
>more where that came from, you know where to call me."
>
>This, Mr. Moth, will truly test your resolve in buzzing the old flame.

Some of us will definately live on the edge....:-)


-BB
From: Alan.Crowder@prg.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Talll women
Date: 14 Sep 92 14:48:36 GMT
X-Mailer: mail-news 2.0.3


Well for those of us who are not attending the Boston Boink (whatever
this is) i hope someone will photograph Liz Loquacious Lovely Legs.
She has it seems the Loooongest legs on the net so hopefully some
good person will post a GIF. Put us all out of our misery.

Alan (6' 3" size 12 feet, ?'dick)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: Appeal to Net.Wisdom
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 23:51:24 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <lb25hfINNmus@news.bbn.com> ahsiung@bbn.com (Anita Hsiung) writes:
>
>I'm not going batty over this.  He's not worth the time.  It's like an
>itch in the back of your knee when you're wearing jeans.  Bothersome.
>What do I say to him??

That's easy......


Just call Rent-A-Boyfriend.  When only the best will do.  When you want
to see *him* turn green.  When you want the whole world to know that
*you* are desirable.  Rent-A-Boyfriend.  Call now.

(Don't settle for the LJBF imitations.  Not worth it.)
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

IRWTFM -- and that ain't fun
From: buick@belay (Patrick D. Buick)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: leg shaving
Date: 12 Sep 92 14:17:14 GMT
Organization: Belay Enterprises Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada

In article <hoyle.716230335@sfu.ca> hoyle@beaufort.sfu.ca (Michelle Hoyle) writes:
>
>I know this is going to sound silly, but since I'm female, it has the 
>advantage of at least being passibly practical.  I shave my legs once every
>business quarter because if I don't the itching that I endure from my
>cotton lycra leotards (I'm allergic to nylon) pushing against the hair
>drives me crazy and I attempt self-mutilation (scratching the skin off
>of my body) in self-defense.  

Ugh.. and allergy to Nylon.. that *MUST* be a [non sexist word describing
a particularly difficult situation]..  (Suggestions? on the word, guys..)

>Therefore, I do not do it because I am
>vain; I do not do it because it improves my performance, per se.  I do
>it because I have to!
>
>Michelle -- A Quirky Blonde Sysop of a Different Flavour
> @The Human Impact Lab (HIL-Vancouver)
>  CA (604) 251-7677
>
Darn, I was out that way this summer.. why didn't I e-meet these netsies
*before* I went... then I'd had lots to do.

PS: I thought the Human Performance Lab at our U was bad for twisted jokes.
  The Human Impact Lab?  Whoa, could I have fun with that....

Patrick

-- 
===========================| Land Line +1 403 286 9188
Patrick D. Buick EMT, EET  | Internet: buick%belay@uunet.uu.net
Belay Enterprises Inc.     | Internet: buickp@cuug.ab.ca
Calgary, Alberta, Canada   | UUCP:...keyword!calgary!pixel!belay!buick
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams)
Subject: Re: Desperation (was Re: Commitment--The C-word?)
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 16:18:29 GMT

In <Bu990C.7CH@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk> andrew@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Andrew Walker) writes:

>crichard@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (richardson craig s - CS500) writes:

>>In article <ewillims.715600678@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>>>In <14423@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>>>
>>>If she does
>>>shave her legs then nothing happens....if she doesn't then it will.
>>>She claims it always works for her!
>>>
>>>Anyone else out there experienced the same? (*GRIN*)

>>Well, I haven't shaved my legs in a couple of years, but it doesn't work
>>for me.  I don't know a whole lot of women who are impressed by that sort
>>of thing...  But maybe I should try to meet some :-).

>I used to know a guy at school who shaved his legs, he claimed that it would
>help him his race times when he swam competitively. The girls didn't believe
>him and teased him mercilessly. He got a lot of attention from them...


	Actually, he had a very good point. I do know a guy who used to
shave his head in order to make a faster time in swim races.
Mind you I do think that maybe shaving leg hair for that reason is a bit
silly as human hair naturally grows in whorls on the body which would
not trap air when swimming .  At least that is what Desmond Morris says
in his book Manwatching where he states that that is yet another reason
why humans were once aquatic primates.  Our hair grows the same way that
dolphin hair does too.  (I'm only quoting someone else here!)
 

>Damn I was jealous! (of the attention that is..:-)

	Well, did his legs look good too?  I have been told by a source in
the advertising business that they sometimes use men's legs (shaven) for 
advertising hosiery as they are generally longer! (*GRIN*)
 

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: What knockers! Crreak.
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 04:17:11 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Keywords: Doors
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1992Sep4.052547.12561@samba.oit.unc.edu> Bathsheba.Grossman@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Bathsheba Grossman) writes:

>Just flip the door back and let me catch it, like you'd do for anyone who
>was a person instead of a woman.  And apply the principle broadly.

I open doors for people regardless of sex.  I'm only a hero about it
when someone appears to need help beyond normal.  People is people;
I try to make sure doors don't slam in faces.

The whole idea of chivalry as portrayed in alt.romance.chat makes me
vomit.  Respect should extend to both sexes, and to all persons.

Now we just have to get more women to open doors for men with the
attitude described above, and we'll be all set.

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Across the evening sky, all the birds are leaving
But how can they know it's time for them to go?		- Sandy Denny
From: morton@cali.rtp.dg.com
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Seesters, I want the seesters.
Date: 5 Sep 92 06:07:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: dg-rtp.1992Sep5.060749.28157
Distribution: na
Organization: Data General Corporation, RTP, NC.

>>>I've read that men's sexual orientations/preferences are in general more
>>>rigid than women's. What do you guys say? Do you have a single "type
>>>preference" that has existed unchanged since your first sexual experience?

	There's like this MAJOR leap , between the initial remark and the
final question, rigid ---> unchanged, this is like what the TV news
people do, you know , disjunct logic, but damn good show business.
I wonder what they teach journalism majors these days ?
Anyway, yes I have a preference based on my first experience, but no 
it does not rob the newcomers. 
I am pretty rigid though, I will only do women.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Tallllll women....
From: parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 02:40:47 GMT
Reply-To: parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz
Organization: Wellington City Council, Wgtn, NZ

In article <1992Sep3.182717.24436@javelin.sim.es.com>, gclapp@javelin.sim.es.com (Glenn Clapp) writes:

>Aaah yes.  Tall women.  How would it be?  I know some, dated some.  Most
>of them that I know are in their teens!  (bummer).  The rest?  Not one
>thing in common.  I once told myself I'd only date >6 footers, then 5'10,
>now no such limits.  I have found the average and even shorter women to
>be much more fun (and more readilly available).  But... tall women... *sigh*
>
>Glenn
>6'10"  (209 cm)




<<WAIL!!!>>



This is _SO_ frustrating!!



- R
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: greg@netcom.com (Greg Bullough)
Subject: Re: nature of postings
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 92 15:05:37 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Keywords: Pathetic, un-realistic, valueless

In article <1992Sep11.130005.29752@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>>Then again, everything went through ihnp5 ...
>
>You mean ihnp4.
 
Yeah, that's what I said. ihnp4.
 
What was my name again? 
 
And who are all these strange people that keep calling me "dad?"
 

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: buick@belay (Patrick D. Buick)
Subject: Re: Powerful forces of nature conspire
Organization: Belay Enterprises Inc. Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 22:58:11 GMT

In article <ewillims.715267850@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>In <thurlow.715151289@convex.convex.com> thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
>
>>I just heard an unsubstantiated rumor (from my nephew) that they
>>has 12 inches of snow in Lethbridge, Alberta on Friday, Aug. 28.
>
>>Hey Emma, wanna go make a snowman?  :-)
>
>	12 inches,huh?  Wow, that could be a great snowman! :>
> 
>

Well, we had some snow, but 12"... I think I'd have heard of it if it were 
that much... heh.. 

How come the intense interest in this group amongst the women to come where the
snowbirds go?  I know I like to do things in the snow (leave it to your 
minds :-)  but an influx of net_goddesses?  wow!.. I'm overwhelmed...

Patrick
-- 
==========================================================
Patrick D. Buick EMT, EET | Internet: buick%belay.uucp@uunet.uu.net
Belay Enterprises Inc.    | Internet: buickp@cuug.ab.ca
Calgary, Alberta, Canada  | UUCP:..keyword!calgary!pixel!belay!buick
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious)
Subject: Re: leg shaving
Followup-To: soc.singles
Organization: Paramax Systems
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 16:03:39 GMT

In article <14540@auspex-gw.auspex.com>, johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep9.213414.26756@gvl.unisys.com> liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious) writes:
|> |If only it was as simple as quantity of time....
|>  
|> I recall a different interpretation for an acronym for CB fanatics.  CB 
|> actually stood for constantly broke.

Well that applies both to the state of the relationship and to his uncanny
ability to spend, spend, spend! 

|> Hello, Liz.  Welcome "Friends and Family of Leg Shavers Support Group".  Sit
|> down and make yourself comfortable.  James was about to introduce himself.
|> James?
|> 
|> "Hello.  My name is James Dutton and I have a bad haircut".
|> 
|> Bad Haircut?  This is the leg shavers group.  You want room 233 down the
|> hall.  In any case, I think those cute little red pigtails are kinda cute.

Liz interjects, "But wait James, I can fix your haircut.  I brought this
razor along with me.  It's been causing me nothing but misery anyway.  
Come over here by me, trust me.  Now was it the hair on your back that
you wanted removed?  Or down here by this pickle?  I'll be careful.."

|> 
|> Good luck, James.
|> 
|> OK, Liz, would you like to introduce yourself?

Well, James and I have already met and it's just you and I now and I don't
know how to say this, but, I feel like I've seen you before.  Perhaps one
day this summer while my lawn was getting cut.   Could it...yes...you
pervert you!  How could you!

Liz Loquacious
Newsgroups: soc.singles