From: gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: Errors in the Astro_Boy AI Program (was Re: Inturdgent whines about media bias (Was: King/Astro Boy?)
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 23:24:25 GMT

<1992Sep3.152649.10072@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) said:
><1992Sep2.143758.4661@nas.nasa.gov> dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King) writes:
>>
>><1992Sep1.202240.11972@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>>
>>My guess is that this post came from Inturdgent himself.  
>>Notice once again he fails to be able to spell intelligence:
>>>The debate is
>>>because of the many intellegence bugs within the Astro_Boy AI
>>>program...
>
>Egads I'm cooked now. Astro_Boy comes complete with a Spelling
>Checker module as a defense. How will anyone ever defeat that weapon? 

Certainly no one with your "intellegence".

>>I have never denied that the media is biased against pro-lifers.
>>I just said I enjoy to hear your whining about it, as if you should
>>have fair representation.  For a bunch of raving fetus fanatics,
>>I personally think the media gives you much more attention than
>>your cause warrants.  I'm sure groups such as the KKK and the 
>>American Nazi party are unhappy with their media coverage.  But 
>>thats the price you pay when you support crazed fringe movements.
>>You have every right to say what you want, you have no right to an
>>audience to preach to.
>
>The media has every business giving coverage to a movement who, as the
>USA Today results after April 5, shows, is more in the MAINSTREAM than
>the pro-aborts. 

Well of course it's more in the "mainstream" than pro-abortion.  I never
claimed to be in the mainstream.

>                That movement is the pro-life movement, of course.
>Even USA Today had to admit that, so reality is probably even worse
>for the pro-aborts. 

Reality is fine for me.  How about you?

>Do you want to see that USA Today issue or do we want to admit that
>what you said up there, was a bunch of bullshit? 

Ooh!  That high rated rag USA Today...  I guess we have nothing more to
discuss.  Except, of course, why this tool of the "Liberal Media" should
be believed.

>>I actually admire the Rush-man.  He took what was a one note joke 
>>and turned it into an enterprise.  He took his joke and convinced a
>>bunch of pre-adolescent little boys to follow him.  Listening to him
>>lately, he seems to have forgotten its a joke though.  It sounds
>>like all his little followers have convinced him to lead.  I 
>>guess you didn't realize Rush is a joke.  
>
>Oh, yeah, and we're practically falling out of our asses when one of
>Gloria Steinem's burning bra's causes her carpet to catch on fire.

Huh?  How often do you "fall out of [your] ass"?

>>So you took me out of your kill file.  What happened to your claim
>>that you only run and hide from the strongest?  Are you now
>>retracting that claim, or are there others stronger than me that
>>you wanted to put in your kill file?
>
>Fool. I only battle the strongest. 

This implies that you are capable of battling.  I haven't seen any
evidence of this.  Do let us know when you complete your mail order 
"Debating Tactics" course.


Gordon
Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), and Diana (Sorceress), 
and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it all.
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion