HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mea@polaris.utu.fi (Matti Aarnio)
Subject: Re: Funny behavior when mailing to programs
Organization: University of Turku, Computing Centre
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 18:47:11 GMT

  There have been comments about permissions used to invoke programs,
and how they are derived from various forms of aliases.

rob@lynx.msc.cornell.edu.UUCP (Rob Vaughn,302 Thurston Hall,50637,2730428) writes:
>Our sendmail is set up like this:
>
>-rwsr-xr-x  1 root     bin        360049 Dec 11 00:12 /usr/lib/sendmail
>   ^          ^^^^
>Note setuid to 'root'.
>
>We have an alias set up as such to save mail message in a file:
>
>catmsgs: "|/bin/cat >> /c/src/documents/msgs"
>
>which had the following permissions:
>
>-rw-rw----  1 root   mscadm       9258 Jan  5 12:57 /c/src/documents/msgs

  I wonder, why this complex 'prog' mailer usage ?
Defining alias as:
	catmsgs: "/c/src/documents/msgs"
there would not be any problems relating to the peculiarities of 'prog'
mailer.

  If course, if you are looking for something else -- for example
writing a mail-based server program, you do need more complex approaches,
like  deliver.

>Thanks,
>Rob
>-- 
>Rob Vaughn, Fugitive Systems Guy
>Mat. Sci. Center Computing, Cornell University
>rob@msc.cornell.edu - rob@crnlmsc2.bitnet

	/Matti Aarnio <mea@utu.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis)
Subject: Re: BITNET
Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation Tech Central
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 05:24:13 GMT

MR> == Mark Roddy <markr@seqp4.sequoia.com>

 MR> is trying to email to his father in what used to be Czech. His mailer
 MR> says: "Return-Path: <@AWIUNI11.EDVZ.UniVie.AC.@:xxxxxx@yyyyyyy.BITNET>"
 MR> on mail from his dear old dad.

Looks like SOMEONE out there is still doing RFC733 "at -> @" translation.

The country domain for Austria is, of course, "at".

Try xxxxxx%yyyyyyy.BITNET@awiuni11.edvz.univie.ac.at; it can't hurt.
--
Christopher K. Davis      | ``Usenet seems to run much like the Kif (or,
<ckd@eff.org>   EFF #14   |   for the TV generation, Klingon) high command.
System Administrator, EFF |   Whoever takes action and can be heard wins.''
+1 617 864 0665  [CKD1]   |   --Peter da Silva <peter@ferranti.com>
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.mail.headers
From: bruce@sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM (Bruce Lilly)
Subject: Re: discrepancies between RFC821 and RFC822 (as amended by RFC1123) regarding Received headers
Organization: Bruce Lilly
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 15:53:39 GMT
Reply-To: lilb@sony.compuserve.com

In article <gfICIOa00WBwQPAmVQ@andrew.cmu.edu>,
 posted to comp.mail.sendmail,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.mail.headers,
 jgm+@CMU.EDU (John Gardiner Myers) wrote:
>
>I disagree.  RFC 821 specifies the grammar of the time stamp line a
>server must insert at the beginning of the mail data (4.1.1.DATA).  I
>see no prohibition in RFC 821 against transmitting a message already
>containing Recieved: headers that do not match the <time-stamp-line>
>grammar.

The section you mentioned explicitly states ``Relayed messages will have
multiple time stamp lines.'' The syntax for the time stamp (Received) lines
*requires* the "from" and "by" clauses. No exceptions are stated. Note that
example 8 in RFC821 shows "from" and "by" clauses in all Received headers,
not only the first one.

I suppose one could claim that Received headers without the "from"
and/or "by" clauses aren't RFC821 time-stamp lines, but are mere ordinary
RFC822 headers.  Note that RFC821 states ``that the final mail data will
begin with a  return path line, followed by one or more time stamp lines.
These lines will be followed by the mail data header and body''. If some
Received headers are to be considered non-time-stamps, then it will be
necessary to reorder the Received headers so that the ones which are also
time-stamp-lines are placed before the non-time-stamp lines. I feel that this
would hamper debugging, as the order of Received headers would not then
correspond to the delivery path.

I still think this area needs some clarification.  For reasons mentioned in
my original article, I would like to see at least the "by" clause made
mandatory.

-- 
    Bruce Lilly, Product Manager,      | 
    Routers, Peripherals & Still Store,| uupsi!monymsys!sonyd1!bruce
    Sony, 3 Paragon Drive, Montvale,   | lilb@sony.compuserve.com
    NJ 07645-1735  |  Telephone: +1 201 358 4161  |  FAX: +1 201 358 4274
From: ltu@ki.icl.se (Lars Tunkrans)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: HOW does Sendmail determine Local domainname : SOLVED
Summary: domainname and Sendmail
Date: 8 Jan 93 14:39:51 GMT
Organization: ICL Data AB Kista Sweden

I had a problem with sendmail being confused about its hosts domainname.
sometimes sendmail thougt it was "ki.icl.se" and sometimes it thought it
was "icl.se".

  The problem was the way that sendmail reads the domainname external to 
sendmail.cf . The one returned by domainname(1M). Obviously the SUN derived
sendmail's  reads the external domainname with sysinfo(2) [ SI_SRPC_DOMAIN ]
and then trunkates everything to the left of the first dot in the domainname.
The resulting string is used as domainname.

  This was then fixed by adding a dot before the domainname so that sysinfo(2)
then returned ".ki.icl.se" which prevented sendmail from removing "ki".


Thanks Lars.
--
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lars Tunkrans  Phone +46 (0)87937419  FAX +46 (0)87938109  DRS Systems Services
DOMAIN Address: ltu@icl.se  X400 Gateway:  l.tunkrans.swe2007@oasis.icl.co.uk 
X400: I=L;S=Tunkrans;OU1=SWE2007;O=ICL Data;P=ICL;A=TEDE;C=SE
From: elias@mvax.uakom.cs
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: xaliases - example wanted
Date: 6 Jan 93 10:45:07 +0100
Distribution: world
Organization: Institute of Automation and Communication

Hi !

Could you send me please your xaliases file if you have
set up any mailing list in it ?

Thanks a lot,

Lubos.Elias@uakom.cs
From: fll@dde.dk (Flemming Lau)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Host search path in subdomain?
Date: 6 Jan 93 17:30:47 GMT
Organization: Dansk Data Elektronik A/S
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]

And now for one more question which I shuld't be asking:

We are currently working on getting the nameserver to run in our organisation.
And we have run into the following puzzling question:

Why does sendmail not like all other nice net-utilities use the res_search()
routine to resolve a not fully qualified name?

Example: 

	Our domain is dde.dk
	We have a subdomain bqa.dde.dk
	There is a host Kurt in the dde.dk domain
	I can ping the name Kurt on a host in the bqa.dde.dk subdomain
	I can NOT mail a user on Kurt from the same host. 

Sendmail.cf files insist on as they cannot find a CNAME for Kurt to 
define it as Kurt.bqa.dde.dk which does not exist. Whereas ping etc.
will try Kurt.bqa.dde.dk, Kurt.dde.dk etc. and succeed. 

Why is this and what do I do about it?


Thanks for any help!
From: ltu@ki.icl.se (Lars Tunkrans)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: How does Sendmail determine Local domainname ?
Summary: Sendmail and "LOCAL"
Date: 4 Jan 93 16:07:23 GMT
Organization: ICL Data AB Kista Sweden

Hello, I have been studing sendmail for a while and I am a little
confused over How sendmail determines what the LOCAL domain name is.

My sVr4 system has the name "sw2020.ki.icl.se".  I thougt that this would
make the LOCAL varible contain "ki.icl.se", but it seems to match both 
"icl.se" and "ki.icl.se"

Here is the definition part of sendmail.cf:


Dmki.icl.se
Dwsw2020
Cwsw2020 sw2020.ki.icl.se
Cmki.icl.se

-------------------

This could be wrong  :-(     if it is, Please tell me how.

What happends is that if i send something off to " user@icl.se" which is 
our toplevel domain, sendmail converts it to "user@ki.icl.se".  

What sendmail -bt  tells me is as follows:

ADDRESS TEST MODE
Enter <ruleset> <address>
> rewrite: ruleset  3   input: "user" "@" "icl" "." "se"
rewrite: ruleset  6   input: "user" "<" "@" "icl" "." "se" ">"
rewrite: ruleset  6 returns: "user" "<" "@" "LOCAL" ">"
rewrite: ruleset  3 returns: "user" "<" "@" "LOCAL" ">"
rewrite: ruleset  1   input: "user" "<" "@" "LOCAL" ">"
rewrite: ruleset  1 returns: "user" "<" "@" "LOCAL" ">"
rewrite: ruleset  0   input: "user" "<" "@" "LOCAL" ">"
rewrite: ruleset  9   input: "user" "<" "@" "ki" "." "icl" "." "se" ">"
rewrite: ruleset  9 returns: "user" "<" "@" "ki" "." "icl" "." "se" ">"
rewrite: ruleset  0 returns: $# "ether" $@ "butler" $: "user" "<" "@" "ki" "." "icl" "." "se" ">"
> 

As you can se it accept's "icl.se" as LOCAL and then Replaces it with 
"ki.icl.se".

When I comment away the "Dmki.icl.se" macro from sendmail.cf this behaivor 
dissapears. LOCAL gets converted back to "icl.se" again.
So obviously the "Dmki.icl.se" record makes sendmail use that as its LOCAL
domain at some point in time.  But where does it pick up "icl.se" as a 
synonym for LOCAL. Its not in sendmail.cf.

My domain name in /etc/resolv.conf is "ki.icl.se".
domainname(1M) returns "ki.icl.se"

Any ideas ?

Lars
--
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lars Tunkrans  Phone +46 (0)87642419   DRS Systems Services
DOMAIN Address : ltu@icl.se         UUCP: 
X400: I=L;S=Tunkrans;OU1=SWE2002;O=ICL Data;P=ICL;A=TEDE;C=SE
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert)
Subject: Re: DEFAULT_DOMAIN in 5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4.1
Organization: Northern Illinois University
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 22:41:30 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.173427.21982@sics.se> uddeborg@sisu.se (Goeran Uddeborg) writes:
>I have a NeXT machine that does not automatically append its domain
>when gethostbyname() is used.

That means that sendmail is doing gethostbyname() with /etc/hosts lookups,
or NIS (or netinfo) lookups, instead of using the nameserver.  I recommend
you rebuild using the resolver library from the bind 4.8.3 release.

>                               So I add it explicitly by defining
>DEFAULT_DOMAIN.  This does change the definition of $j as I would
>expect, but it also defines the N option.  When I later run sendmail
>it complains that the N option is obsolete, and puts a copy of every
>mail in dead.letter.

We corrected this problem a long time ago.  Pick up a more recent copy
of Sendmail.mc from mp.cs.niu.edu:/pub/cf/Sendmail.mc

Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: jhfreeman@iworks.ecn.uiowa.edu (James H Freeman)
Subject: Sendmail dies on mail of 20 lines
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 23:18:38 GMT
Organization: International HP Workstation users' group (InterWorks)

I am trying to configure sendmail to forward mail over a SLIP link
to our campus mail router.  Everything works fine if mail is sent
FROM the campus mail router over the SLIP link to the local node.
In addition, mail messages of a few lines are correctly sent from
the local node over the SLIP link to the campus mail router.  
Unfortunately when mail messages of more than ten lines (somewhere
between 500 to 1000 bytes [yes bytes]), the computers properly
connect, but they then time out.  I have sent mail using
"mail -v" and have seen the correct connection being made, but
then nothing happens until a time out occurs.  Since very
short messages are sent properly, I am at a loss.

The error message on the campus mail router (system that is
receiving the mail) is as follows:

Jan  9 11:11:28 turing sendmail[2764]: collect: unexpected close on 
connection from noether.fmn.cornell-iowa.edu: Connection reset by peer
Jan  9 11:11:28 turing sendmail[2764]: AA02764: SYSERR: collect:
unexpected close, from=<root@Cornell-Iowa.edu>: Connection reset by 
peer during collect with noether.fmn.cornell-iowa.edu

The error message on the local node (system that is sending the
mail) is as follows:

Jan  9 11:05:31 noether sendmail[1100]: AA01096: to=freeman@Cornell-Iowa.edu,
delay=00:08:41, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out during result wait
with turing.csc.cornell-iowa.edu

Does anyone have any idea of what these error messages mean?
Any help would be greatly appreciated since I am at a loss.

Please respond to freeman@Cornell-Iowa.edu since I am using
an account I rarely log into to make this post.  Unfortunately
this is the only way I can post to this news group.

Thank you!

Dr. James H. Freeman             freeman@Cornell-Iowa.edu
Department of Mathematics
Cornell College
600 First Street West
mount Vernon, Iowa  52314-1098
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: rob@lynx.msc.cornell.edu.UUCP (Rob Vaughn,302 Thurston Hall,50637,2730428)
Subject: Funny behavior when mailing to programs
Originator: rob@snoopy.msc.cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell-Materials-Science-Center
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 21:05:13 GMT

I've come upon a strange problem with the sendmail daemon on our Convex
system but I suspect this also crops up using the current IDA release.
It's not a bug per se, but it has caused some serious problems and I
hope someone can enlighten me a bit on why it is happening.

Our sendmail is set up like this:

-rwsr-xr-x  1 root     bin        360049 Dec 11 00:12 /usr/lib/sendmail
   ^          ^^^^
Note setuid to 'root'.

We have an alias set up as such to save mail message in a file:

catmsgs: "|/bin/cat >> /c/src/documents/msgs"

which had the following permissions:

-rw-rw----  1 root   mscadm       9258 Jan  5 12:57 /c/src/documents/msgs

Since my user account is a member of group 'mscadm' I had no problem using
this alias - mail sent to it would be appended to the file thru 'cat'.
But when I try it from 'root', or when cron tries to use this, it fails
in strange ways, ultimately resulting in "554: Illegal mailer error 1".

I finally worked out that when the "prog" mailer is used, sendmail is
executing the program as the user sending the mail, unless that user is
running as 'root' in which case it runs the program as 'daemon'.  When I
changed the ownership of the file above to 'daemon' the problems went
away.

Is my understanding of this correct?  Can anyone explain a little better
what is going on?  I have yet to see any mention of this in any
documentation, and I'm worried that I don't really understand the 
ramifications of this.  Is this a "feature" of some sort?

Thanks,
Rob

-- 

Rob Vaughn, Fugitive Systems Guy
Mat. Sci. Center Computing, Cornell University
rob@msc.cornell.edu - rob@crnlmsc2.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: irving@Happy-Man.com (Irving_Wolfe)
Subject: Re: Funny behavior when mailing to programs
Reply-To: Irving_Wolfe@Happy-Man.com
Organization: Happy Man Corp., Vashon Island, WA 98070-7399
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 05:47:03 GMT

In <1993Jan6.213322.22842@mp.cs.niu.edu> rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert) writes:

>If you want more control over permission during delivery, I recommend
>you install a delivery agent such as 'deliver' (from
>comp.sources.reviewed).  This will also do file locking while delivering
>to a file - cat won't, so the file could be clobbered it two messages
>arrive at about the same time.

I will add that this really happens, and deliver, if properly set
up, really solves the problem.  It's worth the trouble of learning.
-- 
 Irving_Wolfe@Happy-Man.com      Happy Man Corp.  206/463-9399 x101
 4410 SW Pt. Robinson Rd., Vashon Island, WA  98070-7399   fax x108
 We publish SOLID VALUE for the intelligent investor.   NextMail OK
Info free; sample $20.  Send POSTAL addrs: Solid-Value@Happy-Man.com
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: grdetil@scrc.umanitoba.ca (Gilles Detillieux)
Subject: Re: How does Sendmail determine Local domainname ?
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 19:18:57 GMT

In article <1993Jan4.160723.2551@icl.se> ltu@ki.icl.se (Lars Tunkrans) writes:
> Hello, I have been studing sendmail for a while and I am a little
> confused over How sendmail determines what the LOCAL domain name is.
..
> Here is the definition part of sendmail.cf:
> 
> Dmki.icl.se
> Dwsw2020
> Cwsw2020 sw2020.ki.icl.se
> Cmki.icl.se
..
> This could be wrong  :-(     if it is, Please tell me how.

It looks OK to me, although the second name in the Cw definition may not be
needed.

> What sendmail -bt  tells me is as follows:
> 
> ADDRESS TEST MODE
> Enter <ruleset> <address>
> > rewrite: ruleset  3   input: "user" "@" "icl" "." "se"
> rewrite: ruleset  6   input: "user" "<" "@" "icl" "." "se" ">"
> rewrite: ruleset  6 returns: "user" "<" "@" "LOCAL" ">"

Well, since the incorrect address translation is happening in ruleset 6,
could you let us know what S6 in your sendmail.cf contains, along with
the definitions of any other variables or classes it references?

> rewrite: ruleset  3 returns: "user" "<" "@" "LOCAL" ">"
> rewrite: ruleset  1   input: "user" "<" "@" "LOCAL" ">"
> rewrite: ruleset  1 returns: "user" "<" "@" "LOCAL" ">"
> rewrite: ruleset  0   input: "user" "<" "@" "LOCAL" ">"
> rewrite: ruleset  9   input: "user" "<" "@" "ki" "." "icl" "." "se" ">"
> rewrite: ruleset  9 returns: "user" "<" "@" "ki" "." "icl" "." "se" ">"
> rewrite: ruleset  0 returns: $# "ether" $@ "butler" $: "user" "<" "@" "ki"  
"." "icl" "." "se" ">"
> > 
> 
> As you can se it accept's "icl.se" as LOCAL and then Replaces it with 
> "ki.icl.se".
> 
> When I comment away the "Dmki.icl.se" macro from sendmail.cf this behaivor 
> dissapears. LOCAL gets converted back to "icl.se" again.
> So obviously the "Dmki.icl.se" record makes sendmail use that as its LOCAL
> domain at some point in time.

Well, yes.  The Dm variable is apparently being used in S0, but that's not
where the problem is, since ki.icl.se is indeed your local domain.  S0 is
just replacing the string "LOCAL" (which is used internally only) with your
actual domain name before passing it on to S9.  The problem seems to be in
S6's rules.

> But where does it pick up "icl.se" as a 
> synonym for LOCAL. Its not in sendmail.cf.

Very good question.  Hopefully your S6 will give us a clue.

> My domain name in /etc/resolv.conf is "ki.icl.se".
> domainname(1M) returns "ki.icl.se"

That matches your definitions of Dm and Cm, as it should.

--
Gilles Detillieux                       <Gilles@scrc.UManitoba.CA>
Spinal Cord Research Centre             or <grdetil@gilles.scrc.UManitoba.CA>
Dept. of Physiology, U. of Manitoba     Phone:  (204)788-6766
Winnipeg, MB  R3E 0W3  (Canada)         Fax:    (204)786-0932
From: jgm+@CMU.EDU (John Gardiner Myers)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: sendmail-6.8
Date: 10 Jan 93 17:21:12 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.AfICScu00WBwEPAnJs
Distribution: world
Organization: Systems Group 97, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

To give credit where credit is due, my MX piggybacking ideas were
based on code written by Craig Everhart, now of Transarc.

-- 
_.John G. Myers		Internet: jgm+@CMU.EDU
			LoseNet:  ...!seismo!ihnp4!wiscvm.wisc.edu!give!up
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert)
Subject: Re: Funny behavior when mailing to programs
Organization: Northern Illinois University
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 21:33:22 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.210513.6819@msc.cornell.edu> rob@lynx.msc.cornell.edu.UUCP (Rob Vaughn,302 Thurston Hall,50637,2730428) writes:

>catmsgs: "|/bin/cat >> /c/src/documents/msgs"

>I finally worked out that when the "prog" mailer is used, sendmail is
>executing the program as the user sending the mail, unless that user is
>running as 'root' in which case it runs the program as 'daemon'.  When I
>changed the ownership of the file above to 'daemon' the problems went
>away.

That is essentially correct.  However if the mailing results from
forwarding via a '.forward', then the permissions of the owner of the
'.forward' are used.  Likewise, if the alias is a ':include:/path/to/file'
and the included file has a program alias, the permissions of the owner
of the included file are used.  However daemon still replaces root.
This is for extra safety.

If you want more control over permission during delivery, I recommend
you install a delivery agent such as 'deliver' (from
comp.sources.reviewed).  This will also do file locking while delivering
to a file - cat won't, so the file could be clobbered it two messages
arrive at about the same time.
From: mcastro@rediris.es
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: MMDF+UUCP+sendmail=0  please help!
Date: 10 Jan 93 21:32:51 +0100
Organization: REDIRIS, Red Nacional de I+D

I'm trying to get mail at home, I've installed MMDF in my Unix box at home,
and UUCP seems to work fine. I've configured it to have a HP 9000 as my
badhost channel; the hp is running sendmail.
My mail reach the hp, but it doesn't go any further, rmail in the hp 
-yes I've rmail privs- doesn't run so mail > /dev/null. 
I think the sendmail.cf is configured to support UUCP mail, but I'm not sure 
about that. What must be there?. -OK I'm going to RTFM,
but sendmail.cf is 79k long and pretty complex... 
                                                

--
man@taf.fundesco.es <- I prefer this one. |  happy hacking      man
mcastro@rediris.es                        |  ( Manuel Angel Castro )
Disclaimer: My boss doesn't know about Internet, so try to tell him what I say.
From: IK90103@MAINE.MAINE.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Plymouth State, NH- address?
Date: 12 Jan 93 00:43:51 GMT
Organization: University of Maine System

I am trying to write to my step sister at Plymouth State College in New Hampshi
re.  Can anyone tell me the e-mail address there?
                                                    Thanks
                                                     Lee  UMFK.
From: khalid@uk.co.harlequin (Khalid Sattar)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: uk-sendmail 2.1 - redirecting local mail without aliases? and a few
Date: 7 Jan 93 18:14:31 GMT
Organization: Glasgow University Computing Science Dept.
Return-Path: <local-uk-sendmail-workers-request@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: mail-news 2.0.5

My configuration is uk-sendmail 2.1 with multihost option.  We have a
mailhost and number of client hosts.  These clients mount mailhost's
spool mail directory so that mail can be read.  When we send mail, the
use of aliases file ensures that mail for local users is always
redirected to mailhost which will do the delivery.  I like to do away
with aliases on the client machines but putting appropriate lines in
the sendmail.cf file.  If this is possible and not outrageouly bad
thing to do which rule set would be the appropriate place for such
hacks?

Incidently I found a couple of bugs in the sendmail-2.1 if tcp mailer
is used.  Apologies if this has already been reported.  The two bugs were

	a) In rules.m4 line 44, there is a missing $ before the @
	b) In mailer.m4 line 66 there is a trailing space, which
	   causes problems during smpt connection (the . does not get
           seen as an end of message and the connection eventually
           times out (using sendmail 5.65c+ida-1.4.4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
			    Khalid Sattar
			   Systems Manager
     Harlequin Ltd, Barrington Hall, Barington, Cambridge CB2 5RG
	    Email: khalid@harlequin.co.uk, khalid@harlqn.uucp
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
From: tony@ajfcal.uucp (Tony Field)
Subject: FTP site for sendmail with IDA?
Organization: Crafield Digital
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 02:53:12 GMT

Could someone please identify an FTP site for sendmail with IDA?

Please respond via email....

thanks a bunch...
	tony...
-- 
Tony Field                             tony@ajfcal.cuc.ab.ca
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.uucp