HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nix@aslslc43.asl.dl.nec.com (David Nix)
Subject: Re: Dolphins still suck (but are lucky)
Organization: NEC America, Inc Irving TX
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 18:32:45 GMT

> So, if we can't stop Lorenzo White, and we need a missed 41-yarder
> in order to win -- then what kind of chance to we have next week
> in New Orleans, who have Hilliard, Heyward and Morten Anderson?

> I smell fried fish, cajun style.

Pardon me?!  The New Orleans offense is not exactly an NFL juggernaut.  And
Miami did stop White when it counted.  The Saints can forget about the run
against Miami because New Orleans rushing has been anemic against poor defenses,
let alone against one of the best run-defenses in the league.  Hebert is shaky,
and even Morten can't kick them from 65 yards out.  Miami matches up well
against the Saints so I wouldn't put this one in the bag yet.

Miami will play the Saints tough, I guar-on-tee it.  This one is for you, Doug.

David
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dheyser@dazixco.ingr.com (Doak Heyser)
Subject: Re: WE Give UP!!!!!!!
Organization: Dazixco
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 15:37:47 GMT


Brian E. Saunders writes:
>
>In article <By4u1w.4L8@hpuerca.atl.hp.com> krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes) writes:
>>
>>As I sit here in my grungy! basement watching the BILLS DESTROY, CREAM,
>>and Literaly kill the Falcons, I GIVE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>We WANT A REAL COACH !!!!!! someonr anyone take JERRY, HOUSTONq SEATTLE
>>ANYONE

>Many people could have told you that this would happen, but Atlanta was so
>desparate that they went for the flashiness of a Glanville team.  See what
>it gets you?  Now teams hate Atlanta so much they run up the score on
>them.
-- 

   Agreed!  But I have a confession to make.  I'm a (sob) Falcon's fan.
Have been ever since Norm Van Brocklin was the coach and Bob Berry was
handing off to Cannonball Butler.  These days though I root for their
opponent no matter who it is because I want them to get creamed.  This
team is a farce and the front office should be lined up and whipped till
they scream.  Maybe they would understand how us fans feel.
   But don't call me a fair weather fan.  I want the Falcons to become
a good team so I'm hoping they lose big.  Thank you Bills and 49'ers
and Saints, etc ... .  (Thanking the 49'ers - gag!  I must be sick.)
   If they had any sense, they'd hire Reeves away from Denver and let
him run the whole show.  They might not win any stupor bowls but at
least they wouldn't be a joke.

- Doak
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske)
Subject: Vikings Game Observations
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 17:06:53 GMT


I would like to vent a little frustration and post my impressions of
the Minnesota - Cleveland game while they are still relatively fresh
in my mind.  These impressions were gathered through the NBC sports
filter, since NBC was kind enough to show the game to those of us in
the designated viewing area.              

  My observations:

    The Vikings offense was terrible.  Receivers couldn't get open,
    the line couldn't block very well, and neither Gannon nor
    Salisbury could throw the darn ball.
    I'm not really a student of offensive lines so maybe someone
    with more knowledge there could comment on the Viking's line,
    but it does seem that the line is not living up to it's billing.
    Roger Craig did some inspired running but left the game with
    a sprained knee.

    I felt that the Viking's defensive line put almost no pressure
    on the Cleveland quarterbacks (yes, quarterbacks; more on that 
    later).  The Brown's throwers had much too much time to pick
    out targets.  I guess I'm complaining about the defensive line
    because people have been anointing them as the next "purple
    people eaters".  So far it looks like they can be good against
    an offensive line that isn't.

    The benching of Tomzack (?) probably gave the game to the Vikings.

John Ganske
From: v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (JONNY B. GOODE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: NFC dominance?
Date: 16 Nov 92 03:26:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Wow.  The NFC _really_ dominated today.  Whew.

Jon
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chrisc@cae.wisc.edu (Chris Carey)
Subject: Re: THE PACKERS FANS ARE PARTYING TONIGHT, BOY!
Organization: U of Wisconsin-Madison College of Engineering
Date: 23 Nov 92 12:01:10 CST

Any other Packers over ten yards for a reception.  I think the new guy from San
Fran, Lewis, what's his name, just call his receiver opposite Sharpe had one.
PLUS Jackie Harris had about a fifty yard reception(most of it was after the
catch, so I don't know if you want to count that, probably not.)
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Subject: Re: NFC/AFC superiority
Organization: Houses of the Holy
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 17:10:50 GMT

In article <98236@netnews.upenn.edu>, satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:

> I hate to say this but I think Phill Simms was right when he said that
> the AFC was due for a Super Bowl.  I look through the NFC and aside from
> the division leaders and the Saints, I can't see a team that has a realistic
> shot at winning the big game.  The AFC has too many contenders (Houston, K.C.,
> Miami to name a few teams who aren't leading their division).
> 

I think there is a fallacy here; the super bowl isnt held between
the AFC and the NFC.  It is held between one team in the AFC and one
team in the NFC.  So, as long as the team which reaches the SB from
the NFC side is better (at least on that day) than the team which
reaches the SB from the AFC the NFC team will win.  The number of 
teams which can make it to the SB from each conference has no bearing
on this fact.

On the other hand it may be pointed out that if a team takes a 
rougher road to the SB (as you seem to think that the AFC rep. might)
then they might be better prepared for the big show.  To make it
more confusing, this can also be used as a counterpoint; the rougher
the road, the more tired you will be, and maybe you have even had
more injuries.


-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
From: v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (JONNY B. GOODE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: RE:  THE BET III
Date: 19 Nov 92 18:16:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1ef1e4INNa3g@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu>, trottibw@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu writes...

>Here are the top three (yes, only 3, that's all that there need to be.) reasons  
>why the NFC will win the Super Bowl:
> 
>3.  Washington

	Muahahahh!!  Wooooo boy!  That's rich!  Thanks, I needed a little joke
to cheer up my day!!  

>Barry Trottier
>e-mail:  trottibw@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

Jon
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mdh@mlb.semi.harris.com (Mark Hanson)
Subject: Chandler status?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 14:32:54 GMT
Reply-To: mdh@mlb.semi.harris.com (Mark Hanson)
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne, Fl.

What is the status of Chris Chandler for the Washington game?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Hanson
Go Gators, Go Bills (Not all us Bills fans are loud woofing Assholes!!!)
============================================================================
Harris Semiconductor             Internet:   mdh@mlb.semi.harris.com
PO Box 883 MS 62B-022            Work Phone: (407) 724-7572
Melbourne, Fla. 32902
Organization: Central Michigan University
Date: Tuesday, 17 Nov 1992 10:26:53 EST
From: Robert Newby <3ZASIB3@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: STEELERS VS. LIONS - WHAT HAPPENED???
Distribution: usa

Frankly both teams were lousy and John Robinson who covered the game for CBS
said so throughout the game.  I heard the 3rd quarter (did not see it) which
seemed to be the best for the Lions.  Don't be so impressed by the stats,
they were more the result  of some big plays rather than consistency.
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: What the off means
Date: 21 Nov 92 14:16:00 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <By23FC.F2n@mail.boi.hp.com> keithg@boi.hp.com (Keith Glasson) writes:
>
> 	I think I would hate Denver even if they weren't division rivals
>	of the Raiders, though I can't explain why. I don't hate
>	KC the way I hate Denver. And it isn't just me. What is it about
>	that team?
>
>	-keith

Yup, I know what you mean.  I don't even have a reason for hating Denver 
(seeing as how my favorite team is in the NFC East).  
It's the dorky look on Elroy's face during post game interviews that 
does it for me. He had the same look when the Eagles shut them out 30-0 
earlier this year.  

satish nair
go giants
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sooch@duchamp.ipl.rpi.edu (Soo-Chul Han)
Subject: WANTED: 82 Skins/Cowboys game tape
Organization: /home/sooch/.organization
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 04:11:26 GMT

Hi,

I am looking for someone who has video tape of the 
1982 (Jan 1983 actually) NFC championship game between 
the Redskins and Cowboys.
I want the entire game as it was broadcast on CBS.
I am willing to pay BIG BUCKS to whoever can make me a copy
and send it to me.

Respond to sooch@ipl.rpi.edu
--
-------------------------------------------
Soo-Chul Han sooch@ipl.rpi.edu
-------------------------------------------
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Sunday, 15 Nov 1992 21:55:26 CST
From: <U58582@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Week of upsets or what?

The fans of the winning clubs may not accept but this does look
like a week of upsets.


Rams over C'boys
Pack over Eagles
Bucs over Bears
Pats over Colts (Who else can lose to NE?)

Of course other games that the fans of losing teams would consider upsets

Oilers over Vikes
Chiefs over Skins

Well the season looks more interesting now.

Wonder what would be considered an upset in tomorrows game?
From: GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: BILLS WIN!!!!
Date: 17 Nov 1992 09:45:18 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <BxuJJ8.Mqp@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>,
wlay@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Radio 90.1 FM WLAY Tarkington Hall) writes:
>WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFF!!!!!!
>
>Bills 26, Fish 20
>
>Just got done hearing a dolfan complain about the officiating... there were
>calls BOTH ways close enough that I wouldn't want to have to make the call!
>But, a minor reality check: IT'S OVER!! There is nothing you can do about
>it!!

There were bad calls both ways, but the worst had to be in the
closing minutes of the game when Kelly clearly intentionally
grounded the ball back on the Buffalo 2.  Considering that Buffalo
would have had loss of down, and 23 yards to go for a first down,
that one bad call might have very well cost Miami the game. Miami
would have had good field position with a few minutes to punch it
in.  Maybe they would have. Maybe they wouldn't have!

                                                    Tony
                                                 GO 49ERS!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: AFC TEAMS STINK
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:19:48 GMT

In article <BxwGAE.EzK@acsu.buffalo.edu> v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...) writes:
>Buffalo Bills.  Denver Broncos.  Teams that actually managed to *do* something
>the year afterward (no offense intended to the Niners.)  
The year afterward? After what?

Oh, you mean after a division playoff loss? Well, the Giants managed to
win the SB after that loss to the Rams, the Redskins managed to win
another one after that loss to the 49ers. How about the Bills?

>The Giants were a
>disgrace as "defending world champions."  The Redskins are on their way.
Oh, but Buffalo doesn't have the problem of the defending world champions.
So don't worry about it.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
Organization: Central Michigan University
Date: Tuesday, 17 Nov 1992 10:31:04 EST
From: Robert Newby <3ZASIB3@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Lions QB situation [question]
 <ragraca.722007117@vela> <BILLMS.92Nov17090944@gip.eecs.umich.edu>

Kramer will be starting Sunday.  Too bad, it seems Rodney has been fall guy
for some lousy play and offensive coaching that is incomprehensible.  Rodney
has played well but unfairly criticized by the fans and some media.  The
problem with the Lions is that they are a lousy franchise.  Russ Thomas lives.
If you don't believe it check the "JRT" patch on their uniforms.  Rodney
said as much when he blasted the front office for not acquiring OL in the
off-season.  As a 17-year season ticket holder, this situation is disgusting,
even New England has been to a Super Bowl!!!  It's been 40 years since the
Lions have contested for a championship but they are one of the richer
franchises -- they make big bucks and could make more with a winner. Winning,
however, is secondary to the bottom line.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jawiles@eos.ncsu.edu (JERRY ALLEN WILES)
Subject: Re: WIZARD PREDICTIONS !!!!!!!!!
Originator: jawiles@pepe.csc.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: jawiles@eos.ncsu.edu (JERRY ALLEN WILES)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 23:00:01 GMT


In article (Alvino Battistoni) writes:
|> 
|> UPSET SPECIAL by WIZARD -         INDY AT PITTSBURGH             INDY by 6
|> Whether they like to admit it or not, Pittsburgh is hurting without
|> big tight end Eric Green.  Pitt was not very impressive against the woeful
|> Lions last week, and even if they win, I strongly feel that a 12 point
|> spread is too much.  Pitt might pull it out in the end?
|> 
|> COMMENTS WELCOME !!!!!!!!

It would be only fair for the COLTS to beat the STEELERS after they lost to 
the @#$*! PATS(ies)!!  I am betting against the spread (13 points here :).
GO COLTS !!!!



                   
                   <<<<>>>>>>           
                 >><<<<>>>>>>>>>      
                <<<<<<  < >>>>>>>>>   
                <<           <<<<<<<>
               << @    _/      <<<<<>>
              <  \    /  \      >>>>>>_________________
                  |  |   |       </                   ((\\\\
                  o_|   /        /                      \  \\\\    \\\\\\\
                       |  ._    (                        \  \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
                       | /          GO COLTS !   /       /     \\\\\\\     \\
               .______/\/     /                 /       /          \\\
              / __.____/    _/         ________(       /\
             / / / ________/`---------'         \     /  \_
            / /  \ \                             \   \ \_  \
           ( <    \ \                             >  /    \ \
            \/      \\_                          / /       > )
                     \_|                        / /       / /
                                              _//       _//
                                             /_|       /_|
jawiles@eos.ncsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: richard@smok.demon.co.uk (Richard Clyne)
Subject: Trivia - The Answer
Distribution: world
Organization: Richard Clyne (Home System)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 23:54:25 +0000

Right a little late, here is the answer:

I asked who the last player to Rush for a touchdown, Pass for a touchdown,
Receive for a touchdown, and Return for a touchdown.

I had a few enquiries by mail, and a few suggestions were posted in the
newsgroup. Walter Payton was a popular choice but he has not made a return
for a touchdown (though he has punted once for 39yds).

The answer was Marcus Allen who in 1983 Ran for 9 TDs, Passed for 3 TDs,
Received for 2TDs and Returned a fumble for 1 TD.

This weeks question is:

Which Quarterback active last season has lost the most games they have
started?

--
Richard Clyne
319 Violet Lane, Croydon, Surrey, CR4 4HN. Tel +44 (0)81 686 7159
richard@smok.demon.co.uk (Prefered)    rclyne@cix.compulink.co.uk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: AFC TEAMS STINK
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 22:22:06 GMT

In article <BxxCqn.5yt@acsu.buffalo.edu> v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:

>In article <1992Nov16.163218.19492@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>, lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes...

>>I happen to think that the Giants were no better than the Bills. 
>>I also think that the 49ers were the best of the three.

>If the 49'ers were the best in 1990 how come they lost to the Giants.
>The 49'ers lost because of Craig's fumble and Montana's injury.
>When is the last time the 49'ers beat an opponent by 48 points in
>the NFC Championship Game?

Oh, get real.  The fact that the Bills smeared the Raiders and then
lost to the Giants could just as easily be construed as evidence for
NFC superiority.  Besides, the only time the Niners really ring up
the numbers in the playoffs is when they get past the tough NFC foes
and get to cruise on the Fins or the Doncos.

The Bills' drubbing of conference opponents will *not* be evidence of
their superiority until they can equally drub an NFC team - ANY NFC team -
in the Big Dance.

>The Bills were the best team of 1990, they just didn't prove it in
>the Super Bowl.

The Bills were the best AFC team of 1990 (and 1991); what they proved
in the SBs was that they still can't hang with the best of the NFC.

>Bruce, a Bills fan.

And then some.

-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
From: v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Christie saves Bills, NOPE
Date: 19 Nov 92 15:25:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Nov17.131645.8779@iscsvax.uni.edu>, lyle5741@iscsvax.uni.edu writes...
>O.K. so maybe the Dolphins DID lose on Monday night, but at the half they were
>clearly the better team.  I agree that the Bills did win the game and I'm not
>saying that they didn't deserve to win, but if the Dolphins can avoid things
>like the 3rd quarter drought they had, they could beat anyone.  What I want to
>know is how in hell did Buffalo win?

The Bills didn't turn the football over.  My god watch the game or don't
make stupid statements like how in the hell did Buffalo win.
The Bills defense completely dominated the second half.  The dolphins
didn't score until 5 minutes remained in the fouth quarter.  The dolphins
allowed 4 sacks on the supposedly unsackable Marinio.  How many times
has Marino been sacked 4 times in one game?

>        Without their kicker Steve Christie, they're nothing!  Thomas only had
>only a little more than 100 yds. tot. off. and NO tD's.  Kelly didn't have a
>good night.  Neither Lofton or Beebe had long catches.  

Wrong!  Thurman Thomas had 66 yards rushing, 67 yards passing.
I suppose that the 2 rushing touchdowns account for nothing.
For a dolphin defense that allowed only 4 rushing touchdowns all
season, the Bills got 2 in one game.  BTW, the Bills are second in 
league in total offense, and second in scoring, which is better than
the dolphins.  S.F. 49'ers lead in offense and points.  The dolphins
are nothing without Marino,  still no running game.  Only 66 yards
against a team that 27th in league against the run.  The Bills have
300 more rushing yards than the dolphins.

>        As for the Dolphins, Marino was spectacular 300+ yds. passing with 2
>TD's.  His receivers caught nearly everything.  Higgs kept the running game
>going!

Higgs only had I think 30 yards.
Are you forgetting the interception.  Kelly had none.

>        As a Dolphin fan, I'd just like to say that I think the Bills got
>lucky.  Granted, they pulled it off, but not my playing well.  Hey Shula...
> 

Wrong again, partially.  The Bills did get lucky that the officials
didn't cost them the game.  Thurman Thomas touchdown at end of game.
The second half wasn't even close.  The score was not a very good
indicator of how much the Bills dominated the second half.
Marv Levy is 10-4 against Shula, the most wins against him.

Bruce, a Bills fan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood)
Subject: POOL - Important Reminder!!!
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:30:58 GMT

Remember that Week 13 includes Thanksgiving day games.  This means those forms
must be returned by Thursday!  I will post the new form Monday so be sure to
get it in early.  Thanks!

(NOTE: I'm talking about NEXT week's games, not this week's.  For week 12,
you still have a couple days to get in your forms)
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Rex Wood -- davewood@cs.colorado.edu -- University of Colorado at Boulder
  BRONCOS!!        R.S.F.P. Internet Football Pool Organizer        BRONCOS!!
                            Owner, Boulder Houlders
From: m_lott@csd.uwe.ac.uk (M Lott)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Broncos cream Giants Oakland next
Date: 20 Nov 92 09:25:18 GMT
Organization: University of the West of England, Bristol

In article <cmlqf+_@lynx.unm.edu> metv@triton.unm.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov17.182452.28462@pts1.pts.mot.com> schw_mi@pts.mot.com writes:
>>Yes, I said Oakland, the Raiders were and always will be the hated Oakland Raiders to
>>loyal old Bronco fans like myself.  
>>Michael A. Schwarz
>>A missed place Bronco Fan in Dolphin Country.
>>Go Broncos
>>
>
>I must said the same to the Broncos.  I hate Broncos and always will be.  I hopeRaiders win this Sunday.
>
>GO RAIDERS! GO SKINS!  
I must say your understanding of the English language leaves a lot to be desired (but then again you are a Raiders fan, so I guess you did rather well).
From: trottibw@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu (Barry Trottier)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: RE:  THE BET III
Date: 19 Nov 92 03:24:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: master.1ef1e4INNa3g
Reply-To: trottibw@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
NNTP-Posting-Host: g222-23.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

I notice that due to last weeks "AFC" dominance, all of the AFC fans are  
starting to take up "THE BET III"!

Go NFC.

Here are the top three (yes, only 3, that's all that there need to be.) reasons  
why the NFC will win the Super Bowl:

3.  Washington
2.  Dallas
1.  San Francisco

------------
Go Niners!
Go Elway!

Barry Trottier
e-mail:  trottibw@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
From: v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Whiners 21, Saints 20
Date: 20 Nov 92 05:29:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1eej6oINN3dt@morrow.stanford.edu>, GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold) writes...

>With exception the the 4th quarter, the Niners did not play their
>best ball game.  They showed up for 1 quarter and still won.  Do you
>really think the Saints would have even had a chance if the Niners
>had played their style of ball for 4 quarters?
>I always give credit when credit is due. The Saints probably played
>the best game I have ever watched them play. Unfortunately for
>them, it wasn't enough.

Get this bullshit out of here.  You insinuate that the Saints did *absolutely
nothing* to keep the Niners from playing "their style of game," then go and
say, "I always give credit where credit is due."

What a crock of sh*t!!!



>                                                   Tony
>                                                GO 49ERS!!!

"I'm curious as to why you think the Bills' offense is superior to the 49ers."
			--Tony Bechtold

"I'm curious as to why you can't understand 34-31."
			--Me

					---Chet Zeshonski