HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rock@medch.b17a.ingr.com (Chris Hudson)
Subject:  Re: Define "FEMININE" anything goes...
Reply-To: rock@medch.b17a.ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 20:53:39 GMT

nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:

>Feminine is closing on a property sale - with finesse.

>Feminine is that great feeling of getting in the shower after
>cutting the grass and changing the oil.

>Feminine is skiing a NASTAR course at breakneck speed.

>Feminine is reaching through a wall of men at a newsstand for
>a copy of Club International and paying for it without caring
>what anyone thinks.

>Feminine is showing your 9-year-old kid how to throw and catch a
>softball.

>Feminine is doing counted cross-stitch, polishing rocks, and
>collecting old license plates.

>Feminine is being able to change a tire without ruining your
>nails.

>Feminine is wearing pink Hanes Her Ways panties (and nothing
>else) between freshly washed cotton sheets ....

Bravo!  Bravo!  (Loud cheers and applause!)  

Chris Hudson
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jdavidso@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu (Jeff Davidson)
Subject: Re: Those looooong and hard love sessions (was: Re: She called, I came, she smiled, I slept)
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 21:52:29 GMT

Distribution: world

In article <1992Jul21.204551.5268@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William  
Hopkins) writes:
*Now that we got the pleasure dimension all discussed out, here's a related
*question this time on the temporal dimension:
*
*         What's the longest you've ever spent (or ever wanted to spend)
*         making love with someone?

10 hours, with one half-hour break for pizza and a couple of brews; we were  
going to go dancing after the pizza, but... well, things just sort of picked up  
again. 

And just for the people who think you lose it after 30 or so, this was when I  
was *only* 34.
--
************************************************************************
 the Lost Cause                       jdavidso@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
(hardwaire guy extraordinaire)       MACTech,NeXTtech; NeXTmail accepted
                      "Everything is relative."
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org>
Subject: Re: long hair
Organization: ZOOiD BBS
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 05:29:03 GMT

In article <12362@mahon> mahon@Software.Mitel.COM (Ed Mahon) writes:
>How do the net.ladies feel about *guys* with long hair?

terra@reed.edu (Clippers in '93!!!) writes:
> The rocker/stoner/metalhead/just-too-damn-lazy-to-get-a-decent-haircut look,
>though is OUT.  

In article <1992Jul27.220911.28760@zooid.guild.org> ross@zooid.guild.org (Ross Ridge) writes:
>Hey, some of those rock/stoner/metalhead types put more work in to their
>hair than you do.  Certainly at lot more hair spray...
>Not that I put any effort into my own hair, I'm not at all interested 
>to trying to achieve someone elses lame idea of a "decent" haircut.  

terra@reed.edu (Clippers in '93!!!) writes:
>Good for you.  Who cares?

Who needs to care?

>Some guy (Ed) wanted to know what WOMEN thought of MEN With long hair. Not
>what long-haired men think of women who don't like long-haired men.

So?  Of course Ed was just asking about women's preferences, not about
their predjudices.

>Why do people have to get so defensive when one person expresses AN OPINION?

I dunno, why did you?

>  Or were you just lying in wait to inform us all of how "lame" we are for
> having a preference that doesn't include your type?

We?  No, I've ingored quite few lame things you've posted here.

							Ross Ridge

-- 
Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU					     l/	 //
								    [OO][oo]
ross@zooid.guild.org						    /()\/()/
uunet.ca!zooid!ross						     db	 //
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Unconventional ways to meet SO's
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:40:41 GMT

In article <UeP_y1i00VAz81t0U_@andrew.cmu.edu> "Francis J. Yenca" <fy03+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>>Ok, Let me hear about unconventional ways you met your current or >ex-SO's
>
>We met on my front porch.
>
>Frank
 
We met at the petting zoo. She had big come hither eyes. The way she
licked her butt was so cute.

 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
From: ddsw1.mcs.com!karl@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Those looooong and hard love sessions
Date: 23 Jul 92 01:39:00 GMT
Organization: Macro Computer Solutions, Inc., Chicago, IL
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In article <1992Jul22.185909.1412@walter.bellcore.com> nobody writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.061025.2016@ncar.ucar.edu> kuehn@citadel.scd.ucar.edu 
(Jeff Kuehn) writes:
>>>          What's the longest you've ever spent (or ever wanted to spend)
>>>          making love with someone?
>>
>>An ex-SO and I spent a four day weekend in bed... of course there were 
trips
>>to the bathroom (some things just can't be ignored) and the kitchen (ever 
seen
>>"9 1/2 weeks"? :).

Yep....

I spent a weekend in Green Bay, Wisconsin about a year and a half back in
the Embassy Suites hotel there, and never left the room.  It was a very nice
room....

And no, I wasn't alone :-)

--
Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
Data Line: [+1 312 248-0900] Anon. arch. (nuucp) 00:00-06:00 C[SD]T
Request file: /u/public/sources/DIRECTORY/README for instructions
Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.abortion
From: thawley@indetech.com (Todd Hawley)
Subject: Re: Bring Back those WholeSomeTraditonalFamilyValues
Summary: could it be Dan Quayle is lurking on this group? 
Organization: Independence Technologies, Inc. Fremont, CA
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 17:31:03 GMT

In article <1992Jul30.135843.8310@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:

>Isn't it a Shame what years of SeXularHumanism
>have done to this country!!!!!!

Hey, this country's given us 12 yrs of Republican Rule!

>Thank God the ReligiousRight will finally
>restore WholeSomeTraditionalFamilyValues
>and bring Back our God Given Right to own concubines....

Gee, drieux what are TraditionalFamilyValues? I grew up in a dysfunctional
family & I can't remember if we had TRaditionalValues, or SomeValues, or
WeirdValues, or NOValues at all. The concubines sound nice, tho!! Isn't
that some sort of religious tradition??

-th		"Burn BUSH in '92"
From: neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 25 Jul 92 21:06:11 GMT
Organization: Dept of Computer Science, Heriot-Watt University, Scotland

In article <1992Jul22.203230.9389@ccu.umanitoba.ca> browns@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Stuart Brown) writes:
>
>I have serious ethical qualms about a certain 21 year old. But I'm sure I
>would go for it if a) Nobody else would ever know about it
>		   b) I didn't have to talk to her after
>		   c) She would not remember that it ever happened
>
>Then there is the cute 19 year old in the lab - but Perfesser>student
>relations are so utterly verboten that I doubt if I could even get it up
>if all of the above conditions were in force.
>

Are the 'ethical qualms' the above a b c or the professor/student bit.

I'm a little disappointed in your abc's Prof !

Neil


****************************| Sig' Time |*********************************
JANET: 	  neilp@uk.ac.hw.cs   *   Neil Postlethwaite, Rm G.25, 
INTERNET: neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk   *   Dept of Computer Science,  
UUCP: 	  ..!uknet!hwcs!neilp *   Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton Campus
                              *   Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, United Kingdom.
------------------------------*-------------------------------------------
Computer Science Account      *   Phone +44 (0)31 449-5111 x4174
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: kuehn@citadel.scd.ucar.edu (Jeff Kuehn)
Subject: Re: Those looooong and hard love sessions (was: Re: She called, I came, she smiled, I slept)
Reply-To: kuehn@citadel.scd.ucar.edu (Jeff Kuehn)
Organization: NCAR / Scientific Computing Division, Boulder CO.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 06:10:25 GMT

>          What's the longest you've ever spent (or ever wanted to spend)
>          making love with someone?

An ex-SO and I spent a four day weekend in bed... of course there were trips
to the bathroom (some things just can't be ignored) and the kitchen (ever seen
"9 1/2 weeks"? :).

-- 
Jeff Kuehn,    SCD Consulting Office, National Center for Atmospheric Research
==============================================================================
We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we
speak. -- Epictetus
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Don't try this at home!!
Date: 23 Jul 92 17:14:55 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Jul23.070414.15450@informix.com> aland@informix.com (Colonel Panic) writes:
|
|Didya ever have a bit too much and play Ravel's Bolero (from LP) at 45 RPM
|and put it on repeat and tape it that way many times back-to-back and then
|play it continuously?

Which brings up the question, How many of you had to try "doing it" to Ravel's
Bolero after seeing the movie "10".

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
From: fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: long hair
Distribution: world
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 07:17:22 GMT
Organization: GRW Enterprises

Ross writes:
>fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter) writes:
>>BTW, realize that not being attracted to no breasts does not mean being
>>attracted to super big ones (DD or bigger). My room-mate made this mistake.
> 
>Gee... too bad for your room-mate, I hear this kind of surgery isn't
>reversable.  

No, she didn't enlarge her pair to that size, she found a pair that size.
Unfortunately they went along with a woman that ... that ... I don't want
to talk about it.  (Suffice to say, I'm not going on any more blind dates
that this room-mate sets up).

> I see you've got your machine back up and running... for how long?

It's always been up and running. I've just been playing with different
operating systems so my newreading was done at work. I just shifted my
newsreading to home again. However I may shift back to work soon, depending
on how long it takes for my next OS switch to take place. (Have you looked
at 386BSD 0.1 yet ?)

	fred "Ya, I know, take it to comp.unix.bsd" walter
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: Morality- Alarming results
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 04:29:12 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <3781@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> gswst@gl.pitt.edu (Gary S Wachs) writes:

>If this is accurate, then it seems Bart Simpson's "I didn't do it-no one
>saw me do it-you can't prove a thing" attitude is more than just a popular
>form of entertainment - it's a current attitude in the country.

I tend to believe the trend if not necessarily the numbers.  We live
in a society with "don't-get-caught" morals, not one with "don't-do-it"
morals.  This shows up everywhere from the S&L scandal, to Clinton not
being quite candid enough about his draft situation, to the deficit.
It's pretty disgusting, I think.

>Any ideas on what we can do about this?

Not in the short term, but talking to kids about why some things are
both illegal and wrong might eventually help.

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Heaven knows / No frontiers
And I've seen heaven in your eyes			- Jimmy McCarthy
From: zooid.guild.org!ross@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Used threads
Date: 23 Jul 92 00:09:00 GMT
Organization: ZOOiD BBS
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter) writes:
>Hows about arguing about : arguing.
>
>Why argue ?

Because I think you're wrong.

>Do you have to raise your voice and get emotional to get the other person
>to take you seriously ?

DAMN RIGHT, IF YOU DON'T RAISE YOUR VOICE NO ONE WILL BELIEVE YOU CARE
ABOUT WHAT YOU SAY.  If you don't get emotional then you don't care
about your saying.  If you don't care about you have to say, why would
anyone take you seriously?

>Does it serve a constructive purpose ? (Can it ?)

It shows to you and to others in the vicinity that you're wrong.

>Can you keep yourself from verbally attacking the other person's
>intelligence/character/etc. when you are arguing with them ?

By arguing with a person you are by definition attacking the other
person's intelligence and character.  Since I think you're wrong,
obviously I think there is something wrong with your intelligence
and character.  It may be a small little thing, but still it's
something I think is wrong about you.

       Ross Ridge

-- 
Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU          l/  //
            [OO][oo]
ross@zooid.guild.org          /()\/()/
uunet.ca!zooid!ross           db  //
From: strake@coos.dartmouth.edu (strake)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 23 Jul 92 14:35:59 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH


>In article <1992Jul22.110524.8580@cs.hw.ac.uk> neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite) writes:

>>   Given the opportunity if you came across a seriously gorgeously horny
>>   girl who was very repsonsive and willing to get to bed with you, but
>>   you knew she was only 14 years old.
>>
>>   Would you ??
>>
>>   a/	Without a second thought
>>   b/	Only if you knew you would not be caught
>>   c/	?
>>
>>	   Neil

easy question
yes
under condition c
which is if either i would never have to see her again and I couln't get caught
or, I knew her well enough to know that it would be just between the two of
us, it was a one-time thing, and i wouldn't get caught.

--
   _____________________                 strake@dartmouth.edu
  /  __/_ __  __     __  | "And finally, to these two who are about to wed,
 `--, /  /_/ /_/ /, /_   |  may he always have the last two words in any
 __/ /  / \ / / /\ /_    |  argument -- 'Yes dear'.  - Best Man's speech
From: bsou@cs.arizona.edu (Brandon S. Ou)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Female Olympians
Date: 31 Jul 92 18:25:04 GMT
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <1992Jul31.141558.12399@gdr.bath.ac.uk> ccspjs@gdr.bath.ac.uk (Pete J Suters) writes:
>How about Sharron Davies, the British swimmer!!!
>Now she is a BABE!

WHO IS THAT???  I've heard her name quite a few times now, but I haven't
seen her...  :-(
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Comment on men's hair length
Date: 30 Jul 92 12:48:52 GMT
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper

shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller) writes:
] In article <Bs34zA.58o@news.udel.edu> moody@brahms.udel.edu (John David Moody) writes:
] >
] >Several girls I talked to back in college (and women) have said that the
] >hair length with they liked best on men depended on the man's build.
] >
] For me, it depends a great deal on what the man's hair looks like, and
] less on his build.  There are a number of net.men who have really great
] hair, including: Ray Trent, Ed Tecot, Dave Taylor, Kayvan Sylvan, Drieux,
] Ted Lemon, and Oleg Kiselev.  None of these men looks at all alike: they
] are different heights and different builds, but I wouldn't say that any
] of them (at least, the last time I saw them) wore their hair short.
]  
] They're all very attractive men, and their hair just sorta adds to their
] appeal.....


Why thank you.

but my hair has been everything across the spectrum
including 'high and tight' as well as completely shaved off.

My housemate met me the fall after I had shaved it...

Its all in that 'sorta depends' catagory.

If its Bush, and heat, hair is not a viability.

I can not get into my Royal Navy Beret anymore,
as I had too much hair after it got past 9mm.

ciao
drieux

ps: part of the 'looks' is a matter of how we deal with
ourselves as people. 


-- 
I Do Not Believe in .sig files
as they are such a Known Waste Of BandWidth,
And Therefore Not a Morally UpRight Choice.
But I Can See the HideousHienousHandOfHeteroSexualityBehindItAll.
From: zeus.calpoly.edu!jemenake@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: topless
Date: 22 Jul 92 09:06:00 GMT
Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

pjb4288@ultb.isc.rit.edu (Pete - Toonatic - Boulay) writes:
>Rochester here is the home of the famous "Topfree Seven" who just succeeded
>in getting the right for women to not wear tops declared appropriate...

I thought this was interesting. Although it is appropriate in a nudist camp
(where most of the folks are comfortable with nudity... I'd expect), it
seems to me that women would want to cover up to avoid the constant lusty
looks from the common 'man on the street'. In fact, I think it would have
been interesting if a bunch of men showed up at the march and started
playing pocket pool as they walked along.... eyeing their tits. I think it
would have made the women have second thoughts about whether they really
wanted to be topless after all. :-)

Personally, I'd love women to walk around topless. How about totally nude
even? In fact...   damn! Where'd I put those stirrups? :-)

But then... I'm just another visually oriented male.
-- 
Joe Emenaker - Sexual Engineer | "After thinking a lot about the design of 
the 
   jemenake@nike.calpoly.edu   |  human body, I figure it's a good thing that
   
   Pro-woman, anti-feminist    |  God is self-employed, because no company on
 (This is the .sig of the day) |  EARTH would ever hire him as an engineer" 
-Me
From: dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: obnoxious sig quotes
Date: 31 Jul 92 15:39:03 GMT
Reply-To: dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

The really bad news is that I'm out of obnoxious quotes to use in sig files,
and I'll have to do without all that lovely hate mail that I've been so
looking forward to.

Dawn
From: fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Why are Women *SO* Vain ??
Distribution: world
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 06:54:07 GMT
Organization: GRW Enterprises

terra@reed.edu writes:
> if he can tolerate the way I look dripping wet after
> a shower, then we're meant for each other.

I don't think this is a good test ... what if he's nearsighted and doesn't
have his glasses on ? (When I shower with someone I don't wear my glasses - do
other people take their glasses off too ?)

	fred
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 18:16:28 GMT

In article <thurlow.712122981@convex.convex.com> thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
>
>As to the original question, I doubt I'd shag someone under 25,
>never mind 14.  I don't know that anyone has really seen enough
>of life to be intimately enjoyable before then, though I admit
>that's not entirely fair.  But that doesn't mean the idea would
>not cross my mind.

Well, within the twenty-year range of lovers that I've had, it's
been my experience that attitude, creativity, and enthusiasm count
a whole lot more than experience (indeed, the woman I'd label my
most enjoyable lover was both young and relatively inexperienced--
she was, however, rather, ah, enthusiastic).  As indicators of 
sexual enjoyability, I'd pick comfort with herself and her own
feelings, willingness to communicate, and enthusiasm over age
any time.  (Of course I'm still in my twenties myself, so obviously
I need to do some more experimentation to confirm this hypothesis.)

Trygve 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: arevalo@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Subject: Re: Best unconventional use of a TV set
Reply-To: arevalo@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 04:24:42 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.154730.20746@u.washington.edu>, intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.084052.23600@news.cs.brandeis.edu> arevalo@binah.cc.brandeis.edu writes:
>>>
>>>Using a TV with external inputs as a keyboard amplifier.
>>>Rob T
>>
>>>> How 'bout having tremdously good sex on a console tv??
>>>> just me...billy
>
>Yoo-hoo ..Rob?  I think he likes you.  And weren't you one of those who
>said you never got propositioned via the net?  Well here ya go - just when
>you least expected it.
>
>Angelwing - Ain't love grand?

 [MMMMMuuuuuuunchhhhh!!!!....Ummm..that sig was good!!]

 Sorry Angelwing, Rob.....But I'm not that type of guy!!!
 Gee, I'm as staight as a nail. How could you think that???
 just me....billy

 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: Soc.singles.deity.funny
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1992 16:56:43 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <74cgoB1w164w@wildrose> rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink) writes:

>Speaking of velcro and soc.singles....the previous owners of my 
>townhouse left strips of velcro glued to the *ceiling* in the master
>bedroom, located over the bed.  Frankly, I'm puzzled, and didn't have
>the presence of mind to ask the realtor to explain that feature.
>Anyone have any good theories on why it's up *there* ?

Just velcro, no.  A steel hook, possibly :-)

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Heaven knows / No frontiers
And I've seen heaven in your eyes			- Jimmy McCarthy
From: luzenko@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com (Bill Luzenko)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Female Olympians
Summary: What about Paula Wiseoff !!!#####!!!!!
	 did you see when she wiped the sweat from her thigh!! oooohhh!
Date: 31 Jul 92 15:31:33 GMT
Organization: Concurrent - Oceanport NJ


 
Newsgroups: soc.singles