HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: graydon@micor.ocunix.on.ca (Graydon)
Subject: Re: long hair
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC.
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 92 16:49:03 EDT

userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca (Mark Israel) writes:

> In articles <Tc26NB2w162w@micor.ocunix.on.ca> and <L116NB1w162w@micor.ocunix.
> 
>    I *do* insist on a combination of traits that I prefer before going 
> steady.  Would you be willing to go steady with a woman whom you *didn't*
> prefer to others?  Why?
> 
> > Couple of questions, here, Mark - first, what has length of hair got
> > to do with a relationship, as opposed to how aesthetically attractive 
> > you find the person?  
> 
>    I prefer to try to establish a romantic relationship with a woman whom
> I prefer.
> 
> userisra@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca		Mark Israel
> Sunbeams brightly play, where Fancy's fair pavilion once is pight.


You 'prefer to try to establish a romantic relationship with a
woman whom you prefer'.  By itself, this is sensible; everyone 
has some sort of selection criteria.

What you've said about your selection criteria amounts to 'no
smokers' and 'long hair'.  This seems to imply a very strong 
weighting toward aesthetics, which strikes me as insane.

Maybe I'm just desperate to talk to, but even the two strong
physical requirements I've got (doesn't smoke, and lives in herself)
are self image and phycological just as much as physical.

Graydon

        Graydon the Curious         /graydon@micor.ocunix.on.ca
  Skraeling Althing, EAldormere, MK / "Nihil est quin obsisti possit"
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Neccesary and sufficient conditions
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 21:16:55 GMT

In article <70369@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>
>Once upon a time only men had performance anxiety. Now due to the sexual
>revolution and women's rights, women can have it too! Yes, women too can
>feel inferior if they don't have dozens of ejaculatory orgasms per night...

You mean there are women out there who don't?  

Trygve   (But does the standard trick of imagining your audience in their
          underclothes work for this sort of performance anxiety as well?) 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: 14 year old women
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 03:49:19 GMT
Distribution: soc
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <70570@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:

>These days (being older and wiser) I try to stick to guys who are no more 
>than 18 percent younger than I am. 

"Sorry, son, you just got fucked by that tenth of a point ...
I mean screwed ... I mean ..." :-)

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
The sun is gonna shine again / We're gonna make it 'round that bend
I'll walk another mile with you, 'cause you're my friend
The sun is gonna shine again.			- Graham Parker
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: East Side, West Side  The Boink is coming to Town ...
Keywords: Fun Fun <subliminal message about .... here> Fun Fun
Date: 27 Jul 92 19:45:34 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <l784t6INN68s@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
|In article <1992Jul24.154705.2693@newstand.syr.edu> haroome@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Allisson Roome) writes:
|>
|>see what Allisson looks like in a black
|>halter-top miniskirt dress (can I remember to bend properly?), and
|>much more ....
|
|In the interest of shameless self-promotion I must mention that I've bought
|the most fantastic black mini-dress to wear to the Boink.

When is this boink again?  So that was a fantastic bit of self-promotion I'd
still like to see that shameless black mini-dress.  I got that right, didn't I?

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: walter (Walter Lego)
Subject: Re: Used threads
Followup-To: soc.singles
Reply-To: nobody
Organization: Twisted Pair Inc.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 21:15:38 GMT

In article <PALOU.92Jul22145748@osnome.che.wisc.edu> palou@osnome.che.wisc.edu (Ignasi Palou-Rivera) writes:
>In article <ewillims.711803388@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>
>>	   Absolutely correct, Marianna! And what's more, these things don't
>>   just sometimes happen more to women, they ALWAYS happen more to women!
>>   It makes me stinking mad when sales people, be they male or female, always
>>   turn to serve a man first and then I have to create a scene which irritates
>>   me even further as I hate doing it!
>
>Dunno what they do in Ireland, but my experience is usually the
>opposite. Especially if your buying 'female_should_buy_that' kind of 
>stuff: be it food, towels, curtains, ... Probably in a hardware store 
>they serve male customers first, though.
>

Here is a tip for single males that want to buy major furniture. If you want
the sales-critters to give you more than a cursory attention, you must make 
it very clear right at the beginning that there is absolutely no woman in 
your life to invalidate your choice so that they know they won't be wasting 
time discussing fabric and style options with you.

						Walter

What disclaimer?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: goldstn@arrisun3.uta.edu (David Goldstein)
Subject: 14 year old women
Organization: Automation and Robotics Research Institute, U Texas @ Arlington
MessageID: <GOLDSTN.92Jul25024705@arrisun3.uta.edu>
NntpPostingHost: arrisun3.uta.edu
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 08:47:05 GMT
Distribution: soc
X-Bytes: 610

Ya know the weird thing is that even if they think its wrong, I bet most
guys would at least be tempted by the allure of a pretty youngster (seems
to also be true for some male homosexuals and 14 year old boys). I
suspect that this "allure of youth" isn't something that attracts most
women. A 14 year old boy, no matter how pretty, would simply be of no
sexual interest to me at all. So am I right ladies and gentlemen, is this
really a gender difference?


But you're missing a major point: the models of our society, i understand,
are 1416, overdeveloped, and dressed up to APPEAR to be 21 years old!
David
From: lub001.lamar.edu!lairdpg@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: A 12 Inch ruler for 2 more inches!
Date: 22 Jul 92 05:23:00 GMT
Organization: Lamar University - Beaumont
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In article <1992Jul21.231254.7597@u.washington.edu>, 
intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing) writes:
> In article <1992Jul21.154020.1358@lub001.lamar.edu> 
lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu writes:
> 
>>Most guys would keep thier women better satisfied if they had 2 more 
inches.
>>'Course I am *NOT* speaking for myself!
> 
> Oh no .. of course not.  You sound like you're the type of guy who needs
> at least 5 more inches.  Does the phrase "Is it in yet?" ring a bell?

You never look a gift horse in the mouth :)
5 more inches would only make me:

              O    O
                \/
               \__/  <--- S M I L E

Here is a ruler, print it and use it:

|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|
0     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10    11    12

Pretend it is exactly 12 inches long- If you are a guy, it will make you
bigger, if you are a lady, look at it, pretend you are Xavier and scream,
"MORE, MORE, MORE, MORE, MORE, MORE!!!!!!!"
 
> Angelwing - People who don't edit articles really piss me off.
 
Now there, I edited this thing for you, so smile.... and have a terrific
day!  (who ever you are!)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: topless
From: jemenake@zeus.calpoly.edu (Joe Emenaker)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 05:06:22 GMT
Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

pjb4288@ultb.isc.rit.edu (Pete - Toonatic - Boulay) writes:
>Rochester here is the home of the famous "Topfree Seven" who just succeeded
>in getting the right for women to not wear tops declared appropriate...

I thought this was interesting. Although it is appropriate in a nudist camp
(where most of the folks are comfortable with nudity... I'd expect), it
seems to me that women would want to cover up to avoid the constant lusty
looks from the common 'man on the street'. In fact, I think it would have
been interesting if a bunch of men showed up at the march and started
playing pocket pool as they walked along.... eyeing their tits. I think it
would have made the women have second thoughts about whether they really
wanted to be topless after all. :-)

Personally, I'd love women to walk around topless. How about totally nude
even? In fact...   damn! Where'd I put those stirrups? :-)

But then... I'm just another visually oriented male.
-- 
Joe Emenaker - Sexual Engineer | "After thinking a lot about the design of the 
   jemenake@nike.calpoly.edu   |  human body, I figure it's a good thing that   
   Pro-woman, anti-feminist    |  God is self-employed, because no company on
 (This is the .sig of the day) |  EARTH would ever hire him as an engineer" -Me
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: NOT Pickup Lines, ferchrissake, but being InTeReSting, maybe
Keywords: lime Jello, cops, snakes, hematomas, diseases
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 02:24:02 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1992Jul23.034702.15825@osf.org> oaf@serverx.osf.org (Oded Feingold) writes:

>Does anyone know if Kenn Barry survived the last earthquack?

I'd bet he's still ducking ...

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Heaven knows / No frontiers
And I've seen heaven in your eyes			- Jimmy McCarthy
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: rickt@tcom.stc.co.uk (Rick Tait)
Subject: Colour of P*bic Hair - Whats the most common
Organization: BNR Europe, New Southgate, London N11 1HB.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 11:14:02 GMT

This is just out of pure curiousity, but I was wondering
what the most common colour of the old short 'n' curlies is?
(On both sexes). 

My guess is sorta light brown to mid brown, but who knows.
I'm a light-brown/blond kinda guy.


------------------------------------------------
Rick Tait
Network Engineer - NMBase Project - BNR (Europe)
rickt@tcom.stc.co.uk
------------------------------------------------




Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: graydon@micor.ocunix.on.ca (Graydon)
Subject: Re: Long hair
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC.
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 15:07:04 EDT

stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:

> Curt.Shehow@p33.f75.n3603.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Curt Shehow) writes:
> 
> > Speaking(?) of long hair, I was wondering how women feel about long
> >hair on a man. Just a wonder since, mine is getting there (6-7 inches
> >below shoulders).
> 
> I'm more interested in how long a guy's body hair would be if it were all 
> placed end-to-end. 
> 
> --
> Stef                 Where am I going, and what am I doing in this handbasket
> stef@apple.com     

Is this curiousity like-so because you want to attempt this 
particular experiment, or an extremely elipitcal reference to
a quantity preference?

Graydon

        Graydon the Curious         /graydon@micor.ocunix.on.ca
  Skraeling Althing, EAldormere, MK / "Nihil est quin obsisti possit"
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor)
Subject: Re: Morality- Alarming results
Organization: Dept. of Psychology, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 17:44:23 GMT

In article <Bs5u6K.739@news.cso.uiuc.edu> mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor) writes:
>In article <1992Jul29.035035.16360@zooid.guild.org> Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org> writes:
>>But it wasn't a perfectly fine activity, people were dying.  It may be
>>suprising but 55 *does* save lives.  If you don't believe me come to
>>Canada were the speed limit is 100km/h (60 mph), 110km/h in some areas,
>>and the police (in Ontario) won't pull you over for speeding unless your
>>doing over 120km/h.  As a result we have some of highest accident rates
>>in the world.  
>
>Hmmm.  Where are these stats from?

I'll try this again.

I have traveled the 401 and the 402 a good deal the last two years and I have 
only seen one accident on either of these roads during that time.

I've seen more than that on I-65 during a weekend trip to Chicago or Indy.
From: wjb@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Bill Buse)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 18:30:38 GMT
Subject: Re: Trip to Wisconsin - Any Suggestions????
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Loveland, CO
Newsgroups: soc.singles

In soc.singles, sms@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (steven.m.stein) writes:
 > I am scheduled for another business trip to Neenah (near OshKosh)
 > Wisconsin.  My co-worker and I are scheduled to arrive July 28
 > and return July 30.  If anyone can suggest a good restaurant, sites
 > to see, pinball places, etc.. or would be interested in hanging out
 > with us (after work, or course, this is a business trip), just send
 > email.  

You're just missing the EAA Convention and Airshow in Oshkosh, which begins
July 31.  If you could stay around there a few more days you'd likely find
many things to do and new people to meet.  :-)  

Bill
wjb@hpisla.lvld.hp.com
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blackp@med.umich.edu (Jeremy Thomas James)
Subject: Boink-Ann Arbor
Originator: blackp@hendrix.itn.med.umich.edu
Keywords: boink fun
Organization: University of Michigan - Medical Center
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 00:08:46 GMT


I was curious to see how many people would be interested in this...
Whether in Ann Arbor or somewhere near by in Michigan.
-- 
What I say isn't necessarily the opinion of the organization I belong to!
===============================================================================
Jeremy T. James         University of Michigan Medical Center,  ITN 
B1911 CFOB, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0704 Phone:313-747-2778  blackp@med.umich.edu
"Even if your on the right track, you'll get run over if you're there too long"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: being young - the universal disease (was: Re: Fraternities (was: Re: E.W.- Average age of subscribers))
Date: 23 Jul 92 14:29:05 GMT
	<1wlxpbp@rpi.edu> <1992Jul22.215307.28038@octel.com>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: dfair@octel.com's message of 22 Jul 92 21:53:07 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.215307.28038@octel.com> dfair@octel.com (Donald Fair) writes:


   Perhaps a study in logic will aid the political studies.


God knows it would be an unusual and creative approach.
--

Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens. -- Schiller
Ergo bibamus! -- Goethe
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ddose@oregon.uoregon.edu (David C Dose)
Subject: Re: Net.Women
Keywords: good looking cute beautiful etc.
Organization: University of Oregon
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 20:26:47 GMT

In article <1992Jul28.193425.13239@med.umich.edu> blackp@med.umich.edu (
Jeremy Thomas James) writes:
>--------------
>I friend of mine and are are having a dispute as to whether there
>are actually any good looking net.women that read this news group.
>Any suggestions as to how this dispute could be settled?

Of course there are!  At least I know one is, because I've met her! :)
Very, very good looking!

My question is, does it really matter?


Dave


<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<*>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
David C. Dose             ddose@oregon.uoregon.edu                "The Doseman"

We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl, year after year,
Running over the same old ground. What have you found? The same old fears.
Wish you were here.   - Pink Floyd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: The Status of Kenn Berry
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 12:30:51 GMT

thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:

] In <1992Jul23.034702.15825@osf.org> oaf@serverx.osf.org (Oded Feingold) writes:
] 
] >Does anyone know if Kenn Barry survived the last earthquack?
] 
] I'd bet he's still ducking ...


As of the fourth of July he was considered Still Operable.

for further details, please consult the owners manual.

ciao
drieux



-- 
I Do Not Believe in .sig files
as they are such a Known Waste Of BandWidth,
And Therefore Not a Morally UpRight Choice.
But I Can See the HideousHienousHandOfHeteroSexualityBehindItAll.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: walter (Walter Lego)
Subject: Re: Those looooong and hard love sessions
Followup-To: soc.singles
Reply-To: nobody
Organization: Twisted Pair Inc.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 18:59:09 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.061025.2016@ncar.ucar.edu> kuehn@citadel.scd.ucar.edu (Jeff Kuehn) writes:
>>          What's the longest you've ever spent (or ever wanted to spend)
>>          making love with someone?
>
>An ex-SO and I spent a four day weekend in bed... of course there were trips
>to the bathroom (some things just can't be ignored) and the kitchen (ever seen
>"9 1/2 weeks"? :).

If there was ever such a thing as an ExclusiveMaleThread, this would be it.

						Walter

What disclaimer?
From: turneo@jec317.its.rpi.edu (Omar Turner)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Pick Up Lines
Date: 21 Jul 92 14:48:04 GMT
Distribution: U.S.A.
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY



**********************************************************************************

Here is a neat line that I tried what do you think: 
He: Excuse me, was your father a theif?
She: Why no!
He: Then who stole the stars and put them in your eyes?

She smiled and then walked away.
 
Xref: sparky soc.singles:21269 soc.women:14205 soc.men:13793
From: jgh1+@pitt.edu (John G Hardie)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women,soc.men
Subject: Re: Sexual Selectivity and Barbary Macaques
Keywords: selectivity, sociobiology, complexity
Date: 28 Jul 92 17:11:30 GMT
Followup-To: soc.singles
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

[...]
>Personally, I've noticed a distinct tendency (in my experience) for
>women to prefer skinny, inconsiderate sorts who can't pick up even
>a relatively small household appliance and don't have two cents to
>their name.
[...]
>Trygve

I detect a trend.

For any characteristic X which you possess, All MOTAS are guaranteed
to be looking for a mate which possesses NOT X.

This holds even for mutable X - for example your stated opinion on 
asparagus or whatever.  I believe that this phenomenon is fundamentally
related to Murphy's law but I haven't been able to prove it yet.

John.

-- 
jgh1@vm1.cis.pitt.edu

	Give me chastity and continency, but do not give them yet.

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: darragh@maths.tcd.ie (Darragh J. Delany)
Subject: Re: She called, I came, she smiled, I slept
Organization: Dept. of Maths, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 16:07:54 GMT

cs.tcd.ie!droe@overmind.mind.org writes:

> In my experience, nothing divides people into two camps like the
>silent v. noisy orgasm division. It can lead to extreme problems or
>satisfaction. My preference is for the noisy, but I tend to remain
>totally silent myself. I suppose this reveals something deep and
>meaninful but dont really care.

Perhaps it means that you really need people to show their appreciation after
your (legendary) sexual athletics whereas you want to project a strong silent 
type image for yourself (however the moustache really didn't help now did it?)

Dj.

-- 
Dj.

ESS students don't have plans, silly 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.bizarre,alt.peeves
Subject: Re: long hair
Date: 21 Jul 92 18:27:14 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <l6oar8INN9qp@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>
>"The wife should lie as still as possible.  Bodily motion on her part could
>be interpreted as sexual excitement by the optimistic husband."
>"Instruction and Advice for the Young Bride" by Ruth Smythers (1894)

Funny, I tried this advice (gender roles reversed) with my
ProblemOlderWoman, and it didn't work.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Babbage's Birthday Bargain Bash -- December 26th, 1992
From: lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: The TOE JOB is ON!  When do you start?
Date: 28 Jul 92 22:38:37 +1700
Organization: Lamar University - Beaumont

In article <Bs41Gw.1By@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor) writes:
> In article <1992Jul27.235134.1376@lub001.lamar.edu> lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu writes:
>>Just wondering....
>>
>>How do people (you guys and gals) feel about toe jobs?
> 
> They're kinda fun, but they don't pay very well.

  I see....  ANYTHING that is kinda fun seems to be lacking in the "Salary"
department.  Tell me...  You seem kinda experienced.  About HOW MUCH is a toe
job nowadays?
> 
> Are you hiring?

Yes, I am hiring...  Can we go directly to the salary negotiation part of this
deal?  Or would you like to discuss terms, first? ^G  Hmmm...  must be some
line noise.  Oh!, could you tell me,  What do you get when you cross a toe-job
prostitute with a psychologist?

Answer:  I don't know, but for 50 dollars, she will blow your mind! <GRIN>
HONSHU!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNET:LAIRDPG@LUB001.LAMA.EDU               |       PRACTICE SAFE HEX -
these are my views and not my employers views! |    USE A WRITE PROTECT TAB!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Morality- Alarming results
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 20:35:43 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In  <s2km-cn.aahz@netcom.com>  aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius) writes:
>
> Not as long as the speed limit is 55 and people regularly drive at 75.
> This may sound like a nit-picky point, but I think it points to the
> problems in our society much more accurately than a survey about rape.

Not even close.  One shows a lack of respect for a law, and the other
shows a lack of respect for people.

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
Newsgroups: soc.singles