HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner

/ hpspdla:alt.radio.scanner / armille@afterlife.ncsc.mil (A. Ray Miller) / 12:56 am  Aug 15, 1992 /
I am looking to add a better antenna to my PRO-2006 scanner.  I've been looking
through the Grove catalog and come across the following:

"Many discones advertise 25-1300 (or higher) MHz response.  While it is true
that any antenna will get some signals at virtually any frequency, most
discones have poor response below 100 MHz and erratic response above that.

Several discones are extremely well constructed including the Diamond D-130.
It is an excellent, omnidirectional, VHF/UHF transmitting antenna and performs
well for local reception.
...
The best nondirectional, all-band scanner antennas on the market are the
Antennacraft ANT-7 Scantenna, sold by Grove, and the Channel Master 5094A
MoniTenna available from Channel Master."

Grove lists Diamond's discone for $80 and Scantenna's dipole-cluster for $40.

After such a negative overall review of discones I am hesitant to pay double
the cost for the discone.  Is it worth it?  Indeed if the dipole is "the best"
it would seem no other choice should be considered.

Does anyone have any experience with these antennas?  Can someone help me out
with additional information?  Thanks!
-- 

A. Ray Miller
arm@super.org | armille@afterlife.ncsc.mil
----------

Ignore the previous post by David.  If you have not tried either antenna
in application then it is best not to comment.  I have tried both a 
disconne (Icom) and the channel master antenna in my home setup and find
that the channel master beats the disconne hands down.  Signals that 
were weak and heavy in white noise with the disconne (my first antenna) 
now come in perfectly clear on my channel master.  I am also able to
pick up many of the simplex fire operations on tactical channels when
before I had to do with only the traffic on the rptr channels that were
more generic.  The channel master's low band (25-50 MHz) response is a lot 
better than the disconne.  I have no trouble picking up CHP mobile units
as far away as South San Francisco from here in Sunnyvale, which is about
30 miles away (*). Both antennas have been operated the exact same location
on the top of my house using the same cable (RG8/M) so I have a good
point of reference.  The only advantage I see to the disconne is  that
you can use it to transmit if you want to use it for ham radio 
applications too.  

(*) CHP mobile and base units operate on separate simplex frequencies and
    the mobs also. s are normally very difficult to hear.
From: jbs@rti.rti.org
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Listening to cordless phone conversations
Summary: legal, or not?
Date: 18 Aug 92 15:13:37 GMT
Organization: Joe's Bar and Grill

Someone claimed that it was illegal to listen to phone conversations
transmitted by radio, either cellular or otherwise. I replied that it was
legal to listen to portable or cordless (non-cellular) transmissions. He
says I'm wrong, and that congress passed a bill last year amending the ECPA
which made listening to cordless illegal. Is he right? If so, what's the exact
text of the amendment, and what else is now illegal to listen to?

  -joe
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: siegman@EE.Stanford.EDU (Anthony E. Siegman)
Subject: Scanner in Europe? (Eastern Med.)
Organization: Stanford University
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 23:52:45 GMT

Just occurred to me to ask: I'll be in the Eastern Mediterranean for
almost a month (Rome, Elba, Rhodes, Turkish Coast, Crete), and will be
taking along a small SW portable (Sony ICF 7600).  Worth carrying the
PRO-34 also?  (weight, risk of theft, etc.)  What's to listen to?

Responses direct to siegman@sierra.stanford.edu appreciated; I'll be
departing on Sunday, Aug 30.


Xref: sparky alt.radio.scanner:1625 rec.radio.shortwave:6380
From: armille@afterlife.ncsc.mil (A. Ray Miller)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: Senate Scanner Ban bill
Summary: and you thought the EPCA was bad...
Date: 20 Aug 92 05:16:50 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: The Great Beyond

Does anyone know the exact number of the bill in the Senate which bans
the manufacture of scanners capable of receiving certain frequencies?
Seems to me we need to write our Senators expressing our concerns about
this.  Being an election year they are more likely to listen.

Since the Washington Post's article about this and things I've seen locally
on TV in the DC area it is clear that there is a "drumbeat" of publicity
trying to outlaw those bad/evil scanners.  Now is the time to act - later on
you may not have a choice.
-- 

A. Ray Miller
arm@super.org | armille@afterlife.ncsc.mil
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: ba562@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (James R. Lytle)
Subject: Archer Amplified Antenna?
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 92 02:43:51 GMT


Has anyone tryed using the Archer Amplified VHF-UHF-FM
 
Portable Antenna (catalog #15-1607) with their scanner?
 
If so, how well does it perform? And have you come up
 
with any hints or tips to optimize the performance? 
 
 
jrlytle@heartland.bradley.edu
 
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: georgef@microsoft.com (George Forsman)
Subject: PRO-43 and CB
Date: 17 Aug 92 19:00:21 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation

I'm looking into purchasing a PRO-43 to go with my BC760xlt. One of the things
that I'd like is to pick up CB (my local police uses CB for car-to-car).
However, most scanners do not pick up the CB band. I've tried finding an
image of CB with the 760xlt, but, of course, cannot hear anything because
of the AM/FM mismatch.  Since the PRO-43 has a AM/FM select option, I'm
hoping that it will be able to perform the trick. 

What I need to know is: Which way does the PRO-43 have images (up or down?)
and what is the IF?  Has anyone tried to pick up CB on the PRO-43?

Thanks!

George Forsman
georgef@microsoft.com
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: rats@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (RS PRO-2006)
Subject: Re: PRO-34 Mods?
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 17:50:56 GMT


The PRO-37 mods posted awhile back here should be applicable to
the PRO-34; the PRO-37 is simply the PRO-34 with "Hyperscan."

Monitoring Times a couple of years published a modification to
quicken the scan rate by replacing the microprocessor resonator
with a faster clock crystal. The only drawback is that since the
2-sec "DELAY" feature is a firmware resident item, the "DELAY"
time is now < 2-sec. This may or may not be acceptible for your
particular application.

Also, Bill Cheek's COMMTRONICS ENGINEERING sells all sorts of
modifications (parts and/or instructions) for the PRO-34, and his
scanner modification books contain some PRO-34 mods.
From: dbushong@wang.com (Dave Bushong)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: 'Going' rate of a USED BC200XLT ???
Date: 19 Aug 92 02:49:51 GMT
Organization: Wang Labs, Lowell MA, USA

cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:

>What's the 'going' rate for a USED BC-200XLT?

>Please E-mail !

>Thanks! :-)

>Brad Steinman
>University of Toledo Computer Services
>cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu

It depends on whether you are buying or selling; at least, the starting
price depends on that fact.....

(only joking a little bit)

Dave
-- 
Dave Bushong, KZ1O@K1UGM.MA
Wang Laboratories, Inc.
Internet: dbushong@wang.com
From: cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Q: The RS Patrolman PRO-2026: Good?
Date: 19 Aug 92 22:55:54 GMT
Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services

Does anybody know about the NEWER RS Patrolman scanner? (PRO-2026)

Is worth the $200?  I know it doesn't have triple conversion, but at least it
has 800Mhz.

How about the other mobile 800Mhz scanners?  (The BC 760?)

Brad Steinman
University of Toledo Computer Services
cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
Subject: Re: Listening to cordless phone conversations
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 22:35:44 GMT

crisp@netcom.com (Richard Crisp) writes:
: 
: Actually the State of California made it illegal to monitor cordless`
: (non-cellular) phone conversations effective 1Jan 1991. This was in 
: response to the disclosure of the IRS manual that suggested that
: field agents use cordless phone monitoring as a tool for building
: tax cases.

This may, or may not be overturned - if it is ever appealed. The feds
have claimed jurisdiction over the air waves. They do not allow the 
states to create their own legislation.

Bill

I agree that the law is stupid and unenforceable - but then, California
is passing many laws these days that are utterly stupid.

B.
From: cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: The NEW RS PRO-39 handheld
Date: 20 Aug 92 15:44:06 EST
Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services

In article <1992Aug20.181811.26509@cis.ohio-state.edu>, pitonyak@mostaccioli.cis.ohio-state.edu (Andrew Pitonyak) writes:
> In article <1992Aug19.174921.9571@uoft02.utoledo.edu> cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
>>Just got the *NEW* RS catalog.
>>
>>Yes, they do have a new scanner (besides the PRO-43)!
>>
>>The PRO-39 is appears to be a scaled down version of the PRO-43.
> 
> Actaully, it appears to be a recased/redone PRO-37.  This is
> based on the frequency coverage....  It starts air band coverage
> at 108Mhz and the PRO-43 starts at 118Mhz if I remember correctly.
> 
> andy
> 
> 

Oops....  Andy's correct.   The PRO-39 air band coverage DOES start at
108Mhz, instead of 118Mhz like my last post said.  I wonder if the PRO-43 mods
are workable on the PRO-39?


Brad Steinman
University of Toledo Computer Services
cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
From: oviedo@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Miguel D Oviedo)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Antenna Question
Date: 17 Aug 92 19:58:04 GMT
Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab

Hi, I have a Sony Air-8 Radio, but due to my location I am
having a hard time picking up anything (live in a densely populated area)
 I am approx. 8 NM from LGA and JFK airports and about 12 NM 
from NWK airport.  

	Can anyone recommend a good outdoor (inexpensive antenna) I can
use to pick up the anything.  I live in a 3 story brownstone so roof
mounting is OK.
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: skipsand@crash.cts.com (Skip Sanders)
Subject: Re: Handheld Scanner Inquiry
Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: 12 Aug 92 21:04:18 PDT

I have a Pro-43, and live in one of the RF-Hells of the US, San Diego.

The Pro-43 DOES get some interference from digital pagers (I suspect they're
the ones at 930 MHz or so) when one is close (say, 1/2 mile or so?) to the
transmitter.... Unfortunately, in San Diego, that's a definition of much of
the urban area.  The affected frequencies seem to be 450-470 and the 850-860
range... but it's localized, not everywhere, and appears mostly when outdoors.
I haven't had troubles when in a building, most times.  I'd suspect that using
an outside antenna wouldn't be a good idea... they are sensitive recievers, and
high signal strength does seem to cause troubles.
From: claude@cse.ucsc.edu (Claude Noshpitz)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: PRO-34 Mods?
Date: 18 Aug 1992 18:25:18 GMT
Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz (CE/CIS Boards)
NNTP-Posting-Host: spica.ucsc.edu
Summary: seeking instructions for modification of PRO-34 scanner

Hi!  I wonder if anyone out there could point me at or provide
instructions for modification of the PRO-34 scanner...
Thanks very much!!!

--claude (a curious graduate student)

-- 
...................... nothin left to do but :-) :-) :-) ...................
   Claude Noshpitz                 claude@cse.ucsc.edu
     5420 Coast Road                 University of California, AS225
     Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA        Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA   
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: parnass@cbnewse.cb.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S)
Subject: Re: Discone or dipole antenna for scanner?
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 12:15:29 GMT
Summary: discone vs. datcone

In article <60330003@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM>,
jpotts@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM (John Potts) writes:
 
> ...  If you have not tried either antenna
> in application then it is best not to comment.  I have tried both a 
> disconne (Icom) and the channel master antenna in my home setup and find
> that the channel master beats the disconne hands down....

Due to lightning considerations, I prefer antennas which operate at "DC
ground," and discones do not.

I use a government surplus, built-like-a-tank discone and several other
antennas, including an Antenna Specialists (a/k/a Avanti) AV-801.
If I could have only one scanner antenna, it would be either the AV-801
or Channel Master 5094A.
-- 
==============================================================================
Bob Parnass, AJ9S  -  AT&T Bell Labs  -  parnass@ihlpm.att.com - (708)979-5414
From: b1y1m39@kato.BELL-ATL.COM (Bob Esposito)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: FTP Server
Date: 15 Aug 92 01:09:02 GMT
Organization: Bell Atlantic


	I know someone has posted this info before, but I never wrote
	it down.  Can someone refresh my mind as to what host has
	frequencies for different cities?

	Thanks,


-- 
======================================================================
Bob Esposito                       Voice/Voice Mail:    (215) 466-6831
Bell Atlantic Corp.                             FAX:    (215) 563-3984
Philadelphia, Pa.                    E-mail: b1y1m39@kato.BELL-ATL.COM
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: ward@vnet.ibm.com
Subject: pro-2005
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 20:52:40 GMT
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research
From: b_cobb@hannah.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Antenna question
Date: 14 Aug 92 11:45:12 GMT
Reply-To: b_cobb@hannah.enet.dec.com ()
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


I have used CB antennas for Scanner antennas.  The ones that I used were
base loaded and did not have a resonator in the middle of the shaft.  I 
removed the loading coil so that there was just coax to antenna and it
turned out to be a decent antenna,  For low band VHF, I had excellent
luck with taking a regular Cb antenna, removing the loading coils in the
base and putting on a whip about the size of the K40 whip (72 inches) or
so.  The antennas with resonators and short shafts have not bothered to
try.  

-
Name:    Bill Cobb
E-Mail:  cobb@hannah.enet.dec.com
Phone:   508.635.8458
Address: MS DSG1-2/E6
         Digital Equipment Corporation
         4 Technology Park Drive
         Westford, MA  01886

  
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: stogner@burgis.enet.dec.com (Lee Stogner)
Subject: Need handheld scanner with guts
Reply-To: Stogner@Burgis.enet.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 92 21:15:46 GMT


I'm looking for a handheld scanner with a wide frequency coverage, (
including 800 MHZ in 12.5 KHZ steps).  What's out there ?

                                     Thanks,

                                     Lee Stogner
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: tvervaek@col.hp.com (Tom Vervaeke)
Subject: Re: Q: The RS Patrolman PRO-2026: Good?
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 17:50:00 GMT
Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division

I saw one at the local store. It looked and felt solid. I plan on getting
one when it goes on sale. I figure it will be around $149 or so based on
recent event sales prices.  I have a Pro-34 now, but would like something
to mount in the car.  This one is meant for the car. Most of the other
RS scanners can work in the car but are not meant to do so.  
 
I wonder who will come up with the mods to restore full cellular?
 
I also have a problem in that I drive a Jeep Wranger with a hard top made
of fiberglass (I think). I will want to mount a fixed VHF-HI and UHF antenna
and not sure where to put it.  I already have a CB antenna on the outside
but there's only so much room!


Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: parnass@cbnewse.cb.att.com (Bob Parnass, AJ9S)
Subject: Re: PRO-43 beep mod?
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 11:53:34 GMT
Summary: Restrictive design compels customers to seek alternatives

In article <1992Aug20.093304.1@indyvax.iupui.edu>,
nmarsh@indyvax.iupui.edu (The Doctor) writes:

> I realize that all of you people know far more about the intricacies of Scanner 
> operation than I do.  I just WORK at Radio Shack, I'm not a technician.  But 
> most of you *do* realize that you are voiding the 1-year standard or 5-year 
> TSP warranties when you make these changes to your scanners, don't you?


I often remind scanner hobbyists of  the  same  thing.   However,
Tandy  should  insist  that  GRE,  Uniden, Maxon, and their other
suppliers design scanners which allow more  option  changing  via
keypad  instead  of cutting diodes.  Customers wouldn't be forced
into voiding the warranty and Tandy would sell more scanners.

Years ago, before being gobbled up by  Uniden,  Regency  scanners
could  tune  outside  their  rated frequency limits by entering a
decimal point before the first frequency  digit  in  the  program
mode.

Regency only  spec'd  their  scanner  sensitivity  within  strict
frequency limits but customers could elect to listen outside that
range by using this simple keyboard sequence....and everyone  was
happy.

In most cases, the  added  flexibility  requires  only  a  simple
firmware change -- no additional hardware.
-- 
==============================================================================
Bob Parnass, AJ9S  -  AT&T Bell Labs  -  parnass@ihlpm.att.com - (708)979-5414
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: march@nynexst.com (Gregory March)
Subject: Wanted: Sussex County Air Show Frequencies
Organization: NYNEX Science & Technology Center, White Plains, N.Y.
Distribution: na
Date: 12 Aug 92 22:13:53


I'd appreciate it if someone with the frequencies most commonly used
at the Sussex County Air Show in New Jersey would pass them along to
me.

Thanks...

greg
--

------
Gregory F. March    march@nynexst.com
From: armille@afterlife.ncsc.mil (A. Ray Miller)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: TWO frequency mods for the PRO-43
Summary: cellular (870-890 MHz) and low band (51-88 MHz) restoration for PRO-43
Date: 20 Aug 92 04:56:56 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: The Great Beyond

A few people have mentioned the cellular mod for the PRO-43; it turns out
you should not remove but MOVE the diode.  Doing so allows cellular coverage as
well as low band (up to 88 MHz) coverage.

Acknowledgments to Grove Enterprises; this information came from them.
They are selling the PRO-43 for $300 which is $50 less than Radio Shack.
I have no connection with them other than as a satisfied customer.

				PRO-43
	Cellular Frequency Restoration and Low Band Expansion

Note: It is not lawful to monitor cellular or conventional mobile telephone
conversations.

The following procedure requires familiarity with microcircuit soldering and
will violate your warranty.  Grove Enterprises assumes no liability resulting
from its attempt, nor will accept the modified scanner for return under any
condition.

TOOLS NEEDED: Fine point, low power soldering pencil; solder wick or a
desoldering tool; pointed awl, hemostats or pointed tweezers; small Philips
screwdriver; solder.

1) Remove the battery, antenna and back cover (held in place by four screws).

2) Remove the six screws holding the top circuit board in place.  Carefully
unsolder the two antenna connections from the board.  Bend the antenna ground
tab fully up from the board.  Carefully lift the board, unplugging the black
connector at its base, and lay the board out of the way on its bundle of
colored wires.

3) Remove the two screws from the next board and lift it, carefully unplugging
the white connector at the bottom of the board.  Lift it up and lay it aside on
its brown wire (which can be unplugged if necessary).

4) Unsolder and remove the metal shield from the final board, revealing the
microprocessor; note the row of diodes labeled D1-D5 above it.  Only diodes
D1, D2, and D4 are present; assisted by a pointed tool, unsolder and remove D4,
the lone diode (this restores cellular frequencies which will be searched in 30
kHz steps).

5) Resolder the removed diode carefully into position D3 to extend low band
coverage to 88 MHz.

6) Reassemble the boards, paying particular attention to the alignment of the
plugs.  Test the radio by entering any frequency between 870 and 890 MHz
(cellular) and 51-88 MHz (low band).
-- 

A. Ray Miller
arm@super.org | armille@afterlife.ncsc.mil
From: jpotts@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM (John Potts)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 13:31:09 GMT
Subject: Re: PL-259 on a Monitenna?
Organization: HP Stanford Park - Palo Alto, CA
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner

>/ hpspdla:alt.radio.scanner / seanp@undr.org (Sean Petty) /  9:34 pm  Aug 18, 1992 /


       > Can anyone tell me if the Channelmaster 5094A is capable of
       > accepting a PL-259 connection, or if a balun is available
       > somewhere to provide such a connection?  What is the unit
       > factory shipped with?

       > Thanks...

The channel master is a dipole antenna that comes with a balun that
has a type F connector on it.  It also comes with 50ft of RG6 cable
that has an F connector on one end and a motorola connector on the
other.  The motorola connector I feel is the only week point of
the whole system.  I replaced the motorola connector on my 
antenna setup with an F crimp on connector and it works fine.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
       John Potts			jpotts@hpspdla.spd.hp.com
HP Stanford Park Division		   (415)-857-8219	
	Bldg 6U				Telnet 1-857-8219
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: rpo@trsvax.tandy.com
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: The old Pro-38
Date: 12 Aug 92 22:49:00 GMT
Nf-ID: #R:<d#+ys=b@rpi.edu>:-17:trsvax:1687600005:000:41
Nf-From: trsvax.tandy.com!rpo    Aug 12 17:49:00 1992


No.

Paul Opitz
Radio Shack Publications
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: louis@Tandem.com (Louis Meadows)
Subject: BearCat 100 Mods ??
Organization: Tandem Computers
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 18:08:31 GMT

Hi,


 Are there any mods for the BearCat 100 ??


  Louis


 Email:Meadows_louis@tandem.com
From: bjones@novax.llnl.gov
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Antenna question
Date: 13 Aug 92 20:53:21 GMT

Has anyone got any comments of using one of those CB antennas for a
scanner? I would want it to primarily improve frequency response in
the 40-50 mhz range. I speaking of those magnetic base type antennas
that Radio Shack carries for CB use.

Bob

Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: rsch2875@cl2.cl.uh.edu (RUSSELL)
Subject: Operation Rescue
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Reply-To: RSCH2875@cl.uh.edu
Organization: University of Houston - Clear Lake
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 20:57:00 GMT

Anyone know the freqs used by the Operation Rescue folks?

Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: wledder@cs.ulowell.edu (William Ledder)
Subject: Scanner Questions
Originator: wledder@bigmax.ulowell.edu
Keywords: PRO-43, AR1000, 255-400MHz
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Lowell Computer Science
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 14:21:10 GMT


I have a few questions about scanners.  I am relatively new to this group, so if answers have already been given to these, I am sorry that I didn't see them.

1) I currently have a PRO-34, and am thinking about upgrading.  I read an article in POP COMM about the PRO-43, and they seem to like it.  Can anyone
tell me what might want to make me get this to replace my PRO-34?

2) related to 1).  It seems the biggest extra to the PRO-43, as compared to the
PRO-34, is the ability to cover 255-400 MHz.  I live in the eastern part of
Massachusetts.  Am I likely to hear anything interesting on this band?

3) Does anyone have any comment/criticisms on the AOR AR1000?

Thanks in advance.

Bill Ledder
University of Massachusetts at Lowell

e-mail addr : wledder@cs.ulowell.edu
              wledder@bigmax.ulowell.edu
 

Xref: sparky alt.radio.scanner:1599 rec.radio.shortwave:6313