HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: clever@sequent.com (Cathy Cleverley)
Subject: Re: Honesty, Your word, and Trust -- a crisis?
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems (Canada) Ltd.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 18:48:56 GMT

stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:

>ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:

>>I'm glad to know I'm not the only person
>>that has discussions over whether "many" is more than "several", or who
>>proceeds to compute an approximate number when told that there are
>>"a ton of cats up for adoption".

>But were the speaker actually discussing the weight of the cats up
>for adoption, the sentence would be "there *is* a ton of cats up for
>adoption."

>Stef, refugee from Nitpickers Anonymous
>stef@apple.com

Thank you, thank you, thank you.~

(I see nothing wrong with *slight* exagerations when describing
 quantities of things :-)
--
Cathy Cleverley                                 clever@sequent.com
Sequent Computer Systems (Canada) Ltd.          +1 416 629-4000
"An expert is anyone more than 100 miles~
from home with a set of slides"
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (dreas)
Subject: Re: Credibility and Trueness
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 00:59:56 GMT

In article 728075030@convex.convex.com, ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:

[Childish nattering deleted]

>Yep.  You've decided, for some reason, that there's something
>"wrong" with you -- your mind as well as your body -- and 
>allowed a bunch of witch doctors and confidence men to prey
>upon those feelings while they bleed your wallet.  The fact
>is there is nothing wrong with you, that I can see, except
>for a poor self-image because you will not accept yourself
>the way you are (as opposed to the way your fitness books
>say you should be).  

Ed: It takes a wise man to recognize the fact that he has a
    problem, and he is wiser if he does something to solve it.

    I, too, have had occasions in my life where I have had to fight
    a mental illness or solve a personal problem. $ 50 per visit is
    a bloody low price to pay when one's mental health is at stake.

    I still wish you extensive hard times, so that you can develop
    your comedic talents more completely. </.)

dreas
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Greetings Stef...
Date: 21 Jan 1993 17:48:31 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
NNTP-Posting-Host: carina.unm.edu

In article <phantasm.727633094@vincent1.iastate.edu> phantasm@iastate.edu () writes:
>> Who are you, anyway? You keep coming around here with these mysterious 
>> suck-ups, but I've never managed to catch you actually saying anything...
>Forgive me... I did not realize that was a rule...

Suck-ups with no substance is called 'fluff'.
'fluff' belongs in alt.personals.chat.
Have a >happy< day! *hug*
(And a special huggsy wuggsy for a special man in peppermint tights! *HUG*)
r.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: smithrud@advtech.uswest.com ()
Subject: Re: Favorite Groups
Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 20:36:40 GMT

In article <MARTINC.93Jan26104610@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>In article <1993Jan26.173302.1@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz> quirke_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz writes:
>   jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Wall) writes:
>
>   > That's fine with me.  I plan on being the world oldest teenager.
>
>      Well, you'll have to kill Cliff Richard first. Not that that's a
>      bad thing,   mind you...
>
>Are you sure he's not already dead?  I mean, have you seen the way he
>looks now?
>--
>		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
>     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
>	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
>     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
>      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T


Now who took the title of "world's oldest teenager" away from Dick Clark?
I must be tuning in to a different station.

Cari
From: quirke_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: *How* did you meet your SO (And do they know?)
Date: 22 Jan 93 12:17:30 NZST
Organization: Welligton City Council, Public Access.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
:::All together now:
:::"We met at nine..." "we met at eight..." "I was on time..." "no, you
:::were late..." "Ah yes, I remember it well."

::For the totally clueless out there, this is from _Gigi_.

: And for those under 30, "Gigi" was a broadway musical from long back. :)

What's a musical, Uncle rON ?
-- 
Tony Quirke, Wellington, New Zealand (Quirke_A@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz)
"Only the free have disposition to be truthful.
 Only the truthful have the interest to be just.
 Only the just possess the willpower to be free." - WH Auden.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: gdb15@grebe.cl.cam.ac.uk (Guy Barry)
Subject: Re: Favorite Groups
Reply-To: gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk
Organization: U of Cambridge Computer Lab, UK
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 16:25:38 GMT

In article <1993Jan24.091528.2336@netcom.com> rohwerwd@netcom.com (W. David Rohwer) writes:
>
>In article <1993Jan21.113151.16829@infodev.cam.ac.uk> gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk writes:

>>I'm under 30, and I posted the original quote.  Doesn't anyone listen
>>to any decent music any more?
>
>     Sure and by the way I am 30.  I like, in alphabetical order:

[much deleted]

>ABBA;
>Blondie;
>Frankie Goes to Hollywood;
>Madonna;
>Richard, Cliff;
>John Travolta and Olivia Newton John;

Obviously not.

The question was intended as rhetorical, but let me rephrase it: are
there other people born after 1960 who prefer listening to popular
music from before 1960?
--
Guy Barry, University of Cambridge | Phone: +44 (0)223 334757 
Computer Laboratory                | Fax: +44 (0)223 334678
New Museums Site, Pembroke Street  | JANET: Guy.Barry@uk.ac.cam.cl 
Cambridge CB2 3QG, England, UK     | Internet: Guy.Barry@cl.cam.ac.uk 
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.penpals,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat
From: alasnik@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Adam Lasnik)
Subject: Re: SM ISO MAIL
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:07:18 GMT

In <C19GCo.DE7@cen.ex.ac.uk> st92rcn@cen.ex.ac.uk writes:

>My name is rachel and I want your body

My name is Adam, and I want my body, too.  You can't have it.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (dreas)
Subject: Re: Favorite Groups
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 05:11:25 GMT

In article 2336@netcom.com, rohwerwd@netcom.com (W. David Rohwer) writes:
>
>In article <1993Jan21.113151.16829@infodev.cam.ac.uk> gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk writes:
>>In article <1jlmqkINNfsm@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
>>>In article <1993Jan20.192729.4226@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>>>>>All together now:
>>>>>"We met at nine..." "we met at eight..." "I was on time..." "no, you
>>>>>were late..." "Ah yes, I remember it well."
>>>>For the totally clueless out there, this is from _Gigi_.
>>>
>>>And for those under 30, "Gigi" was a broadway musical from long back. :)
>>>r.
>>
>>I'm under 30, and I posted the original quote.  Doesn't anyone listen
>>to any decent music any more?
>>
>
>     Sure and by the way I am 30.  I like, in alphabetical order:

[Pap and puffery deleted]

Now that we know everything about your taste in music, we can clearly
see that you have yet to come out of a thing called adolescence.

Nobody cares what you like or don't like unless you actually get intimate
with others, and they ask you. By the looks of things, you have problems
getting intimate with others because you appear to have an intellectual
age of thirteen, yet you may be thirty biologically.

This is a most saddening predicament, Ol'man. 

rON was just making an innocent little joke that stereotypes people under 
thirty. Others who read the group (myself included, BTW) are younger than 
you and did no more than snicker because they have the ability to laugh at 
themselves, whether they "remember it well" or not.

Get a life, and stop being such a foolish child...

dreas
From: sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Breeding Strategy (was meeting women in clubs)
Date: 27 Jan 93 00:17:49 GMT
Organization: Society for the Promulgation of Cruelty to the Clueless

In article <JMD.93Jan22104519@lion.bear.com> jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond) writes:

>But really, I'm Spidey!!!, and thus a little worried.  I heard that 
>female spiders eat their mates after copulation...

Why do you consider that bad?

Seth
Newsgroups: soc.singles,talk.bizarre,rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Excuse Please, which Planet????
Followup-To: alt.sex,talk.bizarre,rec.arts.startrek.misc,misc.test
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 05:13:16 GMT


trygve,

I'd of given you a 4.5, but you
failed to get an obligatory MPFC reference
linked into it....

ciao
drieux

tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
] 
] Trygve   ("Excuse me, do you speak jargon?")
] --
]                <At this point they have backed up nearly to the doors of the
]                only working hotel elevator which slide open quickly with a
]                loud "shhhh" noise to reveal:>
]  
]       Cap N. Kirker:  How do you do?
]                       I see you've met my faithful cue-card holder.
]                       He's just a little miffed because, when you knocked,
]                       he thought you were his ride to Boulder.
]  
]                       Don't get strung out by the way I look.
]                       Don't judge my ware by its tupper.
]                       I'm not much of a man on a regular day,
]                       but when I direct, I'm a hell of a lover.
]  
]                       <Cap N. Kirker tosses off his cape to reveal his
]                        outfit which consists of gold lingerie with a
]                        starfleet insignia.>
]  
]                       I'm just a sweet transportee
]                       From the Enterprise transporter room.
]                       Let me show you my lines;
]                       Maybe emote a few times.
]                       You look like you're both really super.
]                       If you'd like something visual
]                       But not too abyssmal
]                       We could take in a season of T. J Hooker.
]  
]                       I'm just a sweet transportee
]                       From the Enterprise transporter room.
]                       Why don't you stay for the night.
]                       Or maybe, a bite.
]                       I could show you my favorite...obsession
]                       I've got a makeup man
]                       Who gives me curly brown hair and a tan
]                       And just in time for me to yell "Action!"
]  
]      (The Trekkie Terror Picture Show will be back after this message.)


-- 
MajorModernDayProblems: 

sometimes, a thing will happen after another thing, 
and they may not be connected.....
From: pooh@Apple.COM (Pooh)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Single, what does it mean to YOU?!
Date: 28 Jan 93 11:19:44 GMT
Organization: Internet Refugee Camp


I would define "single" as "available for dating".  This
covers every situation nicely, from Ed "Yes, But..." Wright
to people in open marriages.  After all, isn't that the point
of wanting to know whether someone is single?

Pooh

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: mel@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu (Meloney D Cregor)
Subject: Re: don't get laid for your writhing
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:57:01 GMT

>In article <lmdnvvINN5c0@news.bbn.com>, dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>
>> I also wonder if I agree with Ed when he says that if you don't
>> get paid for your writing, it's masturbation 

And if you do, is this prostitution?
And if so, can just anybody fuck with them?
And if they can, is there a word condom?
And if there is, can I watch you put it on?  I just *have* to see this.
From: misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: power of the unsaid
Date: 27 Jan 93 23:15:09 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, University of Ottawa

In article <MARTINC.93Jan27093128@grover.cs.unc.edu>, martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

>>> The part that seemed reminiscient of someone in particular is the 
>>> part where they (1) over-literalized (2) transformed your statement
>>> into a crisp black-and-white statement (3) realized that wasn't 
>>> precisely what you meant, 
>
> Now, now, do you imagine I meant Ed?  *I* certainly never said that.

   And I never called anyone a pit bull.

misrael@csi.uottawa.ca			Mark Israel
Sunbeams brightly play, where Fancy's fair pavilion once is pight.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Wall)
Subject: Re: Single, what does it mean to YOU?!
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 20:27:55 GMT

In article <77753@apple.apple.COM> pooh@Apple.COM (Pooh) writes:
>
>I would define "single" as "available for dating".  This
>covers every situation nicely, from Ed "Yes, But..." Wright
>to people in open marriages.  After all, isn't that the point
>of wanting to know whether someone is single?

This sounds quite reasonable.  I guess if someone is willing to go out on
a date, I'm willing to take them.  So even someone in a marriage could
be considered single.

Cheers,

Jeff

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: what is attractive ?
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:55:28 GMT

In article <MARTINC.93Jan26172306@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>In article <1993Jan26.193620.29278@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>
>   >enough to use sunblock) tans.
>   No, sun not block.  Sun big round thing in sky.
>Nance, whatever you put in your coffee today, I want some.

Cream.  (Not the verb.)
-- 
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Nance Colucci                                      att!ihlpl!colucci
"In the next life, I should like to come back as your trousers."-BPC
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Important Answer Provided
Date: 25 Jan 93 06:39:53 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:

>drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>>AnyThing[tm] is Better in BED than a NiceGuy[tm]!!!!!

>Oh, I don't know about that......
>                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
>Kinky vanilla queer het

No, I don't think you do. People who know words like "kinky vanilla queer het" 
aren't NiceGuys.

--
Stef                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
stef@apple.com                  Sabina proceeded with her melancholy 
                                musings: What if she had a man who ordered 
                                her about? A man who wanted to master her? 
                                How long would she put up with him? Not 
                                five minutes! From which it follows that no 
                                man was right for her. Strong or weak. 
                                                              --Kundera
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: rhonda@boi.hp.com (Rhonda Abramson)
Subject: Re: Concerts vs. Relationship
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 20:45:46 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard / Boise, Idaho
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.9 PL6]

Pooh (pooh@Apple.COM) wrote:
: In the referenced article, brent.mason@uuworld.via.mind.ORG (Brent Mason) writes:
: >       Now I'm not blaming it on the concert or the artists, but it just
: >strikes me odd.  Have any of you had similar experiences?
: 
: Yes.  A guy I was dating took me to a Barry Manilow concert.
: It was all over after that.
: 
: Pooh
: 	pooh@apple.com

Oh god!  You too!!!  I know exactly what you mean, Pooh.  After watching
Barry up on stage... no other man will do..... *sigh*




  :)


                                   -- Rhonda
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: A hug for illiterate flamers
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 26 Jan 93 21:33:52 GMT

julie@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu (Julie Wright) responds to "HUGS" with a
brilliant masterpiece entitled:
>	   GAG
>	by J.R. Wright

Julie ... forget your seesters.  Will you marry me?

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Re: FeMale TransVestitieISM
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 03:25:14 GMT

martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
] In article <1993Jan24.072127.1170@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
] 
]    Just Because SOME FEMALES get a Sexual Thrill out
]    of Dressing up Like James Dean! Does NOT mean that
]    they are Sexually NORMAL!!!!!
] 
] It doesn't?

Trust me on this one Charles.....

As a Small Warning, IF she Roars UP on a 
Harley with a pack of 'Lucky Green' rolled
up in the sleeve, this is NOT the white Knight
you've been waiting to take you away.

ciao
drieux


-- 
MajorModernDayProblems: 

sometimes, a thing will happen after another thing, 
and they may not be connected..... 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (Piglet)
Subject: Re: (LONG) Re: Living alone and liking it
Organization: the house on the corner
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 22:20:31 GMT

In article <ewright.728249571@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>In <1993Jan28.112130.23473@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>
>>I like parsnips - Ed, try making them like mashed potatoes sometime, 
>
>Doesn't work.  I've spent hours standing over those parsnips,
>grilling them under a hot light, and telling them, "You *vill*
>like mashed potatoes," but they just won't cooperate.
>


Oh, *crumbs*!  Ed made me laugh!!  Like, to the point of it-would-have-
been-dangerous-if-I'd-been-drinking-cause-it-woulda-come-spurting-up-
my-nose.  (Don't you just hate when that happens??)


Piglet, with a crushed self-image
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: gdb15@grebe.cl.cam.ac.uk (Guy Barry)
Subject: Popular music (Re: *How* did you meet your SO (And do they know?))
Reply-To: gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk
Organization: U of Cambridge Computer Lab, UK
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 20:23:40 GMT

I've come back into this thread since someone's decided to say something
intelligent...

In article <6032@maserati.qsp.UUCP> danb@zx.qsp.UUCP (Daniel Benbenisty) writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.113151.16829@infodev.cam.ac.uk> gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk writes:
>>I'm under 30, and I posted the original quote.  Doesn't anyone listen
>>to any decent music any more?
>
><WARNING - OFF THE SUBJECT>
>
>I will heartily agree that almost all the new music you hear on the radio
>today is pure crap, and lacking in originality.  However, it is also true that 
>most of the stuff you might have listened to on the radio 15-40 years ago was 
>pure crap, and lacking in originality.
>
>The only difference is that you mostly listen to the 'best' stuff from the 
>'old days' nowadays - the music that (presumably) by dint of its integrity 
>has survived to get more airplay in proportion to its peer music than it 
>used to.  

This is undoubtedly true, but I think there's more to it than that.
Forty years ago, popular music was written by professional
songwriters.  Obviously they had to churn out a lot of commercial
potboilers, but they still had to learn their craft.  Songs might
become associated with a particular performer, but they still had an
independent existence.  These days, performers tend to perform their
own stuff, and songwriting is becoming a lost art -- in fact the
actual music is often secondary to the image of the performer.

It all probably changed as gramophone records started to become
easily available, and sheet music went out of fashion.  As
technology has advanced, we've got more and more used to accepting
a pre-packaged product.

This should probably go to rec.music.gripes or something...


--
Guy Barry, University of Cambridge | Phone: +44 (0)223 334757 
Computer Laboratory                | Fax: +44 (0)223 334678
New Museums Site, Pembroke Street  | JANET: Guy.Barry@uk.ac.cam.cl 
Cambridge CB2 3QG, England, UK     | Internet: Guy.Barry@cl.cam.ac.uk 
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex,talk.politics.misc
From: sms@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (steven.m.stein)
Subject: Re: Valentine's Day Personal Ad
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:45:52 GMT

In article <106459@netnews.upenn.edu> crawford@ben.dev.upenn.edu (Lauren L. Crawford) writes:
>
>Hi.  I'm not too young, not too old, with long blond hair.  Unless you
>prefer dark brown hair, in which case it's dark brown.  Sometimes it's
>short.  And red.  My eyes are sweet baby blue ... except when they're
>deep, mysterious brown.  Or green.  Hazel.  Whatever.
>
>I'm tall and svelte, with lots of curves.  Or maybe not so many curves. 
>If you prefer short, I'm short.  
>
>I like ballroom dancing and disco dancing.  I've been known to contra
>dance and square dance.  I've been known to hate dancing altogether.  I
>like to dress up in little black dresses and pearls, or dress down in jeans
>and a sweatshirt.  I like to go out and party, or stay home and nuzzle by
>the fire.  Or watch TV and eat popcorn.  Or mow the lawn.  Or go to poetry
>readings.  Or heavy metal rock concerts.  I camp.  I fish.  I ride dirt
>bikes.  Or ... I'm very domestic and love to cook and sew.  Unless that
>puts you off.   
>
>I like sports, if you do.  Whatever sports you like, I like.  Or, if you
>are a couch potato, so am I.  
>
>You are tall, dark, and handsome.  Although looks really don't count; I'm
>too deep for that.  Send a photo, though.  I don't care what you earn, but
>I hope you're really, really rich.  I saw "Pretty Woman" 12 times.  He
>bought her a *lot* of stuff.  If you like Julia Roberts, I look just like
>Julia Roberts.  
>
>You are intelligent.  Well, you don't have to be intelligent.  Your
>personality is warm, kind, funloving, eccentric ... maybe not eccentric. 
>You don't have to be funloving or warm, either, if you don't want to be. 
>
>You are male, and you have a pulse.
>
>Hope to hear from you soon.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Lauren Crawford  //  crawford@ben.dev.upenn.edu


Lauren, this was great.  Did you write it or copy it from somewhere?

Now there's a person who believes in not limiting the possibilities,
any of them, for any reason.  I'm willing to be who you want me to be
if you just agree to take me.  Cute, I liked it.

                 Steve Stein  (609) 639-2264
    *******************************************************
    *  Just my opinion, though it could change tomorrow   *
    *******************************************************