HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tmcconne@sedona.intel.com (Tom McConnell~)
Subject: Re: Problems compiling gcc2.3.1. on AIX3.2/RS6000 
Organization: Intel Corp., Chandler, Arizona
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 20:13:09 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.102327.60682@cc.usu.edu> edx@cc.usu.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov10.142724.24992@jussieu.fr>, eranian@fructidor.ibp.fr (Stephane ERANIAN) writes:
 <stuff deleted>
>> _muldi3
>> Assembler:
>> /tmp/ccQ4wCzR.s: line 33: 1252-142 Syntax error.
>> make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1.
>> 
>> Make Quitting.
>> 
>> What's wrong, please help !!!!!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>I saw this behavior too.  Change the Makefile to compile things without
>the -g and the -g1 debugging flags.  Then it will compile ok.
>

  You haven't fixed the problem, just hidden it for a while. You need to
get the fixed compiler. I built gcc-2.3.1 on AIX-3.1 and AIX-3.2 out of
the box.

  From the ./gcc-2.3.1/README.RS6000:

    Debugging code compiled with GCC on the RS/6000 requires that you
    upgrade the AIX assembler /bin/as with a replacement that is available
    from IBM.
    
    Any customer can order and get the replacement assembler, and install
    it on one or more machines.  It is distributed both on diskette and
    via VNET, for downloading via ftp.  VNET distribution may be desirable
    if you have a friendly IBM rep nearby with a networked VM machine.
    
    In either case, to order, execute
        lslpp -h bos.obj to determine your release level.  (Look on the
    ACTIVE line for something like 03.01.0005.0012.) Then call IBM Support
    at 800-237-5511.  Ask for emergency shipment of the rs6000 AIX fix for
    APAR IX26107.


    Cheers,

    Tom McConnell
-- 
 Tom McConnell          |     Internet: tmcconne@sedona.intel.com
 Intel, Corp. C3-91     |     Phone: (602)-554-8229
 5000 W. Chandler Blvd. | The opinions expressed are my own. No one in 
 Chandler, AZ  85226    | their right mind would claim them.
From: torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: __asm__ changing memory - no way to tell gcc?
Date: 6 Nov 92 17:10:35 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki

I just spent a couple of days looking for a bug in the linux sources
that was "less than obvious", and due to a gcc __asm__ statement
changing memory - without gcc knowing about it, and optimizing away (or
moving) some needed instructions. 

The problem essentially looked like this:

  void clear_inode(struct inode * inode)
  {
	struct wait_queue * tmp;

	tmp = inode->i_wait;
	memset(inode,0,sizeof(*inode));
	inode->i_wait = tmp;
  }

Now, this looks like it simply couldn't fail, so I was searching for the
bug elsewhere for days, until I in desperation looked at the assembly
output of the above:

  _clear_inode:
	pushl %edi
	movl 8(%esp),%edx
	xorb %al,%al
	movl %edx,%edi
	movl $164,%ecx
  /APP
	cld
	rep
	stosb
  /NO_APP
	movl 52(%edx),%eax		<<<<<<
	movl %eax,52(%edx)		<<<<<<
	popl %edi
	ret

Well, the problem was obvious: I was using inline assembly for the
memset routines (as at least gcc-2.2.2 doesn't yet do it by
__builtin_memset).  The exact definition I used for the above code is
(yes, I know - I should re-write it to use long-word clearing):

  extern inline void * memset(void * s,char c,size_t count)
  {
  __asm__ __volatile__("cld\n\t"
	"rep\n\t"
	"stosb"
	::"a" (c),"D" (s),"c" (count)
	:"cx","di");
  return s;
  }

Note that the gcc optimizer hasn't noticed that the inline assembly has
changed the inode data, so it thinks that it can just move the first
assignment to *after* 'memset()'.  Even the __volatile__ doesn't help:
it seems __volatile__ stops only major re-organizations.

Ok, it may not be a bug - the docs do state that you have to be careful
about __asm__ statements with side-effects, but it's a bad feature:
especially as I couldn't find a good workaround.  I tried adding a
output field of the form '"=m" (*s)' to tell gcc that the memory pointed
to by 's' got changed, but this (not surprisingly) only resulted in a
bad type error due to the dereferencing of a void pointer. 

The '"=m" (*s)' trick does work when the type of the pointer is known,
but not with a void pointer (and I can't just cast the void pointer to
something else: it would have to be cast to something of "infinite size"
to be safe).  The optimal solution would be to allow '*s' in this kind
of context, but I don't know how well that meshes with the rest of the
compiler... 

I solved the problem by changing the temporary variable assignments to
be volatile (ie "tmp = ((volatile inode *) inode)->i_wait" etc), so I
got the bug corrected, but I was left wondering if there was nothing
cleaner I could do..  (the only manual I have is a pre-version for 2.0). 

		Linus
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.os.vms
From: garvin@athena.mit.edu (Langton C Garvin)
Subject: help on installing GCC v2.2 on VMS
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:43:33 GMT

Hi, I need some help. I just got the gcc v2.2 pre-compiled savesets
from mango.rsmas.miami.edu and I tried to install only the gcc
compiler, preprocessor, header files, etc (I did not try to install
bison, g++, libg++, or the info files).  To test the installation, I
tried to compile and link the following  "Hello World" code:

#include <stdio.h>
main ()
{
printf("Hello World\n");
}

I was able to compile it OK with "$ GCC HELLO.C" (ie. I was able to
get an object file), but when I tried to link the code with:
"$ LINK HELLO, GNU_CC:[000000]GCCLIB.OLB/LIB"
I wound up getting the following errors:

%LINK-W-NUDFSYMS, 3 undefined symbols:
%LINK-I-UDFSYM,         C$MAIN_ARGS
%LINK-I-UDFSYM,         PRINTF
%LINK-I-UDFSYM,         __MAIN
%LINK-W-USEUNDEF, undefined symbol PRINTF referenced
        in psect $CODE offset %X00000025
        in module HELLO file USER2$DISK:[POULOS.C.GCC022B.GCC-SRC.VMS.GCCLIB]HELLO.OBJ;1
%LINK-W-USEUNDEF, undefined symbol __MAIN referenced
        in psect $CODE offset %X0000001B
        in module HELLO file USER2$DISK:[POULOS.C.GCC022B.GCC-SRC.VMS.GCCLIB]HELLO.OBJ;1
%LINK-W-USEUNDEF, undefined symbol C$MAIN_ARGS referenced
        in psect $CODE offset %X00000011
        in module HELLO file USER2$DISK:[POULOS.C.GCC022B.GCC-SRC.VMS.GCCLIB]HELLO.OBJ;1

--------------------------

What's going on? Have I gotten an incomplete version of the object
library? How can I get the compiler (or is it the linker ?) to work
properly on this machine? Do I have to install all the other bison and
g++ stuff to make it work?  Any help  or advice would be greatly
appreciated.

Please send replies to garvin@athena.mit.edu


Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,gnu.misc.discuss
From: gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl)
Subject: Re: Language frontends for gcc?
Organization: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 16:59:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.162323.11757@csrd.uiuc.edu> poulsen@sp91.csrd.uiuc.edu (David K. Poulsen) writes:

>I've been told about the Gnu Fortran project.  Several responses suggested
>I contact Craig Burley at burley@gnu.ai.mit.edu.

The address to write to be added to the GNU Fortran mailing list is
info-gnu-fortran-request@prep.ai.mit.edu. For information about how
alpha-testing is going, finger -l fortran@gnu.ai.mit.edu. Writing
Burley won't get you much of an answer while he's on vacation.
From: gt@prosun.first.gmd.de (Gerd Truschinski)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: cross compiling produces worse code
Date: 5 Nov 92 19:28:45 GMT
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GMD Berlin (FIRST)

In article <9211040113.AA04481@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>, rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman) writes:
|> Please supply a specific test case, and by looking at the assembler code
|> find and identify paticular places where the output is different.
|> 
|> We do not have a staff of people to do these things,
|> so unless you do them, further investigation will not begin.

I have done so with the libgcc1.a on a SUN3 and a SUN4. Now I have
two 'objdump -d's and they differ. Is there anybody interested in this
files?
I try to figure out what happens, but I don't now much about the internas
of gcc....

Mail me.

/gT/

--
Gerd Truschinski         | INTERNET:    gt@first.gmd.de
c/o GMD-First  Berlin    | 
O-1199 Berlin-Adlershof  | TEL:         +49 30 6704 2662
Rudower Chausee 5 (13.7) | FAX:         +49 30 6704 5088
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman)
Subject: GNU C COMPILER
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 13:55:29 GMT

Why are you using such an old version as 1.30?  That is several years
old.  The current released version is 1.42; it is much more reliable
than 1.30.  (We also have version 2 in beta test, now at level 2.3.2.)
I urge you to switch to a modern version.

(I can't help you with regard S-records; that's outside the scope of
what I do.)

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: gdk@ssi.UUCP (Gary D. Kline)
Subject: signal 6 from cc1plus
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 16:01:03 GMT

On my home i386 running SVR4, gcc-2.2.1 compiles and installs easily--
using gcc-2.1's files.  But in building libg++, I get an internal
error from the compiler: cc1plus has died with a signal 6.  From working
with at least 3 versions of gcc, I expect this is an abort().  

Do any of you know what I'm doing wrong?  Perhaps some flag in the
makefile needs to be changed.  I'm getting v2.3 soon; in the meantime, 
I'd  like to have both gcc and g++ working.

Thanks for any help, clues, pointers.

gary kline


Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: lott@bogner.informatik.uni-kl.de (Christopher Lott AGSE)
Subject: two q's re v2.3.1 install
Organization: Universitaet Kaiserslautern FB Informatik
Distribution: gnu
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 08:15:46 GMT


Hi,

Yesterday I fetched, compiled, and installed gcc v2.3.1.
We have sun4s running sunos 4.1.1.  I have a few questions,
which are probably ridiculously simple, but the answers
don't seem obvious right now.

1.  Should I be using gas and gld?  Right now, I use neither
    and the objects are linked dynamically (which I think is
    great).

2.  Where do the g++ header/include files come from?  I seem
    to be lacking them.
    (If I just need to ftp another piece of GNU stuff from 
     somewhere, this is great, but could this bit of info
     perhaps be added to the INSTALL file?  Thanks.)

3.  What is the libgcc.a used for?  It was installed under
    /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc.../2.3.1 and is a collection
    of objects that can be used in static linking.  I'm asking
    because I wonder how this works with/against dynamic linking
    on our suns.

4.  Finally, what is "glibc-1.05" (seen in this group) and why
    (?) do I need it?

Thanks in advance for any and all help.  My apologies if I've
overlooked the answers in the INSTALL, but I really did read it.

chris...
-- 
Christopher Lott    lott@informatik.uni-kl.de   +49 (631) 205-3334, -3331 Fax
Post: FB Informatik - Bau 57, Universitaet KL, W-6750 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: TERRY@spcvxa.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr)
Subject: Can't get there from here (GCC on VMS from scratch)
Organization: St. Peter's College, US
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 03:05:14 GMT

Hi -

  I'm trying to build gcc 2.3.1 on VAX/VMS from scratch. The gcc-2.3.1.tar.Z
file alludes to a "VMS kit" which is a backup saveset. I was unable to locate
such a kit on prep.

  I have acquired bison and gas. However, I am unable to build gas as it wants
to be built with gcc, and the gcc INSTALL document says I need a working gas
in order to build gcc. Further, the gcc INSTALL document claims that I may have
problems with gas 1.38.1 and implies I should have a newer one. However, 1.38.1
is the latest (only) one I could find on prep.

  So, my questions are:

1) Where can I obtain the VMS kit alluded to in the gcc INSTALL document?
2) Is there a newer gas than 1.38.1?
3) Where can I obtain a pre-built VMS version of gas?

	Thanks for your time,
	Terry Kennedy		Operations Manager, Academic Computing
	terry@spcvxa.bitnet	St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA
	terry@spcvxa.spc.edu	+1 201 915 9381

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: west@chance.tsd.itg.ti.com (Roger West)
Subject: -fpic coredumps on a sparc
Organization: Texas Instruments, Speech Mushrooms.
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 04:33:12 GMT


Has anyone gotten gcc 2.3.1 to sucessfully generate position independent code
on a sparc?  Is PIC code generation even expected to be working yet?  Here's
what I'm getting...

    gcc2 -fpic -S -o fun.s fun.c
    gcc2: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6


This is what I'm trying to compile..

    extern void puts();

    void fun() {
	puts("Called fun.");
    }


This is as far as gcc gets...

    gcc2_compiled.:
    .text
	    .align 8
    LC0:
	    .ascii "Called fun.\0"
	    .align 4
	    .global _fun
	    .proc	020
    _fun:
	    !#PROLOGUE# 0
	    save %sp,-112,%sp
    L2:
	    call L3
	    nop
    L3:
	    sethi %hi(__GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-(


Here's what the Sun cc compiler produces...

    LL0:
	    .seg	"data"
	    .seg	"text"
	    .proc 020
	    .global	_fun
    _fun:
	    !#PROLOGUE# 0
	    sethi	%hi(LF13),%g1
	    add		%g1,%lo(LF13),%g1
	    save	%sp,%g1,%sp
    1:
	    call    	2f
	    sethi	%hi(__GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - (1b-.)), %l7
    2:
	    or		%l7, %lo(__GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ - (1b-.)), %l7
	    add		%l7, %o7, %l7
	    !#PROLOGUE# 1
	    .seg	"data1"
    L15:
	    .ascii	"Called fun.\0"
	    .seg	"text"
	    ld		[%l7+L15],%o0
	    call	_puts,1
	    nop
    LE13:
	    ret
	    restore
	   LF13 = -96
	    LP13 = 96
	    LST13 = 96
	    LT13 = 96
	    .seg	"data"


Thanks for any responses.
--
   _____________________________________________________________
   |   Roger West              Internet: west@tsd.itg.ti.com   |
   |   Texas Instruments Inc.    TI MSG: RWES                  |
   |   PO Box 149149, MS 2201     Voice: (512) 250-7372        |
   |___Austin, TX 78714-9149________Fax: (512) 250-7104________|
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: d9mj@crux1.cit.cornell.edu (Scott Coolness)
Subject: djgpp installation
Summary: how do you install djgpp?
Keywords: djgpp dos install
Organization: Cornell Information Technologies
Date:  5 Nov 92 06:49:02 GMT

So I pkunzipped all the files (djdev, djdcc, djgas), and I never got
an excecutable gcc.exe file. I got a cc1obj.exe and a cc1plus.exe, but
no gcc. Should I have?
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: lim@telerobotics.jpl.nasa.gov (David Lim)
Subject: gnu version of cxref?
Reply-To: lim@telerobotics.jpl.nasa.gov
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Distribution: gnu.gcc.help
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 20:17:26 GMT


Is there a gnu version of cxref around? I'm basically interested in a cxref
that will work with ANSI C.
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: vtessier@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Vince Tessier)
Subject: I keep getting "ld: Undefined symbol ___main" errors
Summary: I screwed up a search/load path somewhere, but where?
Keywords: gcc-2.3.1 sparc sunos4.1.1
Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI.
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 23:14:55 GMT

Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa ...

I violated a cardinal rule by zapping something before its replacement
was proven, and now I can't compile anything with gcc.

I used to run gcc-2.2.1 just fine on my sparc.  Then I built 2.2.2, and
within a couple of days 2.3.1, configuring with 

	./configure --target=sparc-sun-sunos4.1.1 --with-gnu-ld

The entire build and install process went just fine, compiling the
compiler with itself, installing fixincludes, and so on.  But every time
I try to build another package, I can compile the object modules, but
when I go to link the executable, I get a message of the form

	main.o(.text+4): undefined reference to `___main' 

If I build without the "--with-gnu-ld" option and make 'collect2' to
call Sun ld, I get 

	ld: Undefined symbol ___main 
	collect: /usr/bin/ld returned 2 exit status

Of course, I zapped my old gcc-2.2.1 after 2.2.1 and later 2.3.1 built,
compared, and installed without problems; I don't recall how I had
set 2.1.1 up (a while ago).

I've looked through INSTALL, README, the info files, and browsed the
sources for gcc and ld, and can't seem to find where I've gone wrong.

-- 
Vince Tessier	vtessier@vela.acs.oakland.edu

"Think global, act loco."  -- Zippy
From: csi063@cck.coventry.ac.uk (Lover...)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: HELP GCC & ATARI ST
Date: 9 Nov 92 15:09:19 GMT
Organization: Coventry University

I am trying to locate a port of an uptodate version of GCC ( C++ )
for the atari ST. I have not been able to locate any ports above
version 1.37.

If anyone knows where I might locate a port or has any information 
about porting GNU GCC from one platform to another I would be most
greatfull if they could contact me.

	Thanks in advance :-

			Simon Love 


+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
+ Simon Love : csi063@uk.ac.cov.cck : coventry university Student +
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Simon Love / The Lover, BSC Computer Science Year 2, 47 Carmalite rd, Stoke! |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: ebubra@ebu.ericsson.se (Bertil Askelid)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Memory leak detector with gdb?
Date: 7 Nov 92 01:01:44 GMT
Reply-To: ebubra@ebu.ericsson.se (Bertil Askelid)
Followup-To: gnu.gcc.help
Organization: Ericsson Business Communications, Anaheim, California
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.


   A while ago an article was posted about a memory leak detector
   running with gdb 4.*. I missed it. Is there someone who happens to
   have a copy of it and would like to email it to me?

   Thanks!
-- 
			Bertil Askelid
			ebubra@ebu.ericsson.se
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: jimlynch@netcom.com (Jim Lynch)
Subject: more 68000 output from gcc
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 11:46:36 GMT

Does your compiler allow segmentation and limiting code size within
segments?

Also: does your compiler have inline assembly?

What body of info do I need to know about re: porting your compiler to
a new 68000 environment? I intend to use the 'bootstrap' method:
compile the compiler on an existing gnu system then move the gnu system
there.

Jim

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: markg@shasta.nextwave.COM (Mark Glasser)
Subject: doubles in structs
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 23:12:00 GMT


Help!!

I'm running on a sun sparc (IPC) with SunOS 4.1.1.  I've configured gcc-2.2.2 as

    ./configure --target=sparc-sun-sunos4.1

The compiler was built successfully - including the self recompile/compare
steps.  The trouble seems to have to do with doubles in structs.  I have a
struct that looks something like this:

    typedef struct
    {
        enum ExprTokenType type;
        union
        {
    		unsigned ui;
    		int i;
    		char *str;
    		double f;
    		enum Operator oper;
            PTR p;
        } u;
    } ExprToken;

When I assign to u.f The program crashes.  Why?

    token->u.f = (double)cnv_atof(str);

cnv_atof() is a function that converts a string to a double.  This program
works fine using the standard sun C compiler.  Not the new unbundled
compiler, but the old one as shipped with 4.1.1.

As an experiment I replaced double f with float f in the union.  This seemed
to work but the program crashed elsewhere where I was assigning to a double
in a struct.  Here's the context of the second failure:

    void TaskInsert(module_name, when, id, name, args)
        char *module_name;
        double when;
        TaskId id;
        char *name;
        FLL *args;
    {
        TaskInvocation *ti;
    
        ti = (TaskInvocation*)allocate(Lsizeof(TaskInvocation));
        task->module_name(ti) = module_name;
        task->time(ti)   = when;
        task->id(ti)     = id;
        task->task(ti)   = name;
        task->args(ti)   = args;
            .
            .
            .

Here is the TaskInvocation struct

    typedef struct
    {
        double time;
        char *module_name;
        TaskId id;
        char *task;
        FLL *args;
    } TaskInvocation;
 

I have two suspects.  Doubles are not aligned properly within dynamically
allocated structures.  Or, doubles are not passed in and out of functions
correctly.  Does anyone have any ideas?  Are there any known bugs relating
to this area? Do I have the thing configured correctly?  These code
fragments are from a rather large program.  If these problems do not ring a
bell then I can work on producing a small test case - just let me know.

Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this problem.


Mark Glasser
------------------------------------------------------------------------
markg@nextwave.com                            Nextwave Design Automation
                                                450 San Antonio Road #27
                                                     Palo Alto, CA 94306
                                                    (voice) 415.855.9795
                                                      (fax) 415.855.9792
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: eemrw@cc.newcastle.edu.au
Subject: Multiple compiles via gnumake
Organization: University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 05:26:02 GMT

Hello,
	I would like to use gnumake to compile
multiple source files at the one time. I would like
in the first instance to do this on one machine and
possibly do distributed compiles ( if this is supported ).

	If anyone has had any experience or has any example
makefiles to do this please contact me.

Thanks in Advance
Mark West
Univeristy Of Newcastle,
Australia.

email : EEMRW@cc.newcastle.edu.au
		or
	mwest@tesla.newcastle.edu.au
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,gnu.misc.discuss
From: poulsen@sp91.csrd.uiuc.edu (David K. Poulsen)
Subject: Re: Language frontends for gcc?
Organization: UIUC Center for Supercomputing Research and Development
Distribution: gnu
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 16:23:23 GMT

poulsen@sp91.csrd.uiuc.edu (David K. Poulsen) writes:

>Someone mentioned to me that there was a project where someone was building
>a Fortran compiler using the guts of gcc and a new frontend.  Not that I
>personally endorse the use of Fortran, mind you :-)  Does anyone know if
>this is true, who is doing it, where the code is available, etc.?

>Along the same lines, what about Pascal?

I've been told about the Gnu Fortran project.  Several responses suggested
I contact Craig Burley at burley@gnu.ai.mit.edu.

There's also a Gnu Pascal for a gcc 2.0 base.  This is available via anonymous
FTP from kampi.hut.fi in the directory jtv/gnu-pascal.

Thanks for the help, everybody!

Dave Poulsen
poulsen@csrd.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: stan@sabaac.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Andrew Staniszewski)
Subject: gcc-2.3.1 on VMS
Reply-To: staniszewski@mayo.edu
Organization: Mayo Foundation
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 15:45:01 GMT

Hi,

does anyone know if gcc-2.3.1 will have a distribution set up for VMS.

a copy of 2.2 was (and is) available on mango.rsmas.miami.edu.

will this be updated to 2.3.1???

Is it relativly simple to build and install gcc, bison, and gas, none of in which
have sufficient documentation about VMS?????


thanks


AJS

staniszewski@mayo.edu
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help