HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2, Gateway 2000, Sony CD, and a Monitor w/o synch
Date: 2 Jan 93 18:13:36 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1hfcukINN3gm@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cr334@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Stephen R. Berard) writes:
>Hello, I was trying to install the PDK CD from IBM.  I have a Gateway 2000
>486 with 8 megs of memory.  I have an ATI Graphics Ultra Pro video card
>that is the local bus VESA version.  	
>I couldn't get my CD ROM to install OS/2 so I made disk images.  Upon
>loading them as instructed I got to only disk 5, then it asked me to put in
>the installation disk.  After doing so I copyied a few files and rebooted. 
>First I was wondering if this was normal (I think it is), anyways.  Now
>when the machince booted up I got the OS/2 logo and the loading please wait
>screen.  Then when a dialog box came up my monitor appeared to loose synch
>because I couldn't read anything(the screen was scrolling so fast).	

Perfectly normal (except for the mad scrolling, of course).  What is
happening is that, for whatever reason, your monitor is unable to sync
to the image your video adapter is generating.

To try and remedy the situation, get ahold of your ATI setup utility.
This should be located on a diskette that came with your system.
Configure your ATI adapter so that it does not use above 72 Hz
noninterlaced in 8514/A mode.  Verify that all modes sync properly to
your monitor.  Then save these settings.  Then repeat your
installation.  If installation fails again, try some different
settings using the ATI utility.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: scurry@pansy.srg (Scott Curry)
Subject: REPOST: How to setup emx0.8e under FAT?
Organization: SRG, Arinc Research Corp., Annapolis, MD
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 22:57:05 GMT

--
***Disclaimer: The above are solely my own opinions, NOT of Arinc Research.  *
* Scott Curry, Analyst	 		 Email: scurry%srg@uunet.uu.net	     *
* Phone:  (410)266-4940 		 Smail: 2551 Riva Road  MS 5-230     *
* Fax:    (410)573-3024		                Annapolis, MD  21401-7461    *
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: furballs@sequent.com (Paul Penrod)
Subject: Re: Future of OS/2 and IBM????????????
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems, Inc.
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 92 09:56:18 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.174533.894@spang.Camosun.BC.CA> dbarker@spang.Camosun.BC.CA (Deryk Barker) writes:
>mgrice@athena.mit.edu (Matthew Grice) writes:
>[....]
>: I'm getting sick of Jerry Pournelle, too.  OS/2 bashing.  Won't even 
>: install HPFS on his OS/2 test computer.  Now he is going to announce to
>: the people that os/2 is slow.  What a bastard.
>
>Off topic, but I've been sick of Pournelle, his goddamn libertarian
>politics, his wife and her goddamn reading tutor, his son's computer
>repair business and his other son's HP Poqet wqith which he apparently
>runs the US Navy, for months.{
>

Well, being the sniveling journalist that he is, is what gets him
the press and attention, just like Dvorak. It reminds me of the 4
year old child, about 5 second after being told NO. :)


-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
            Bureaucracy: noun, plural - Bureaucracies.
         The process of turning energy into solid waste.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: copernicus@digund.uucp (Copernicus) 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: FOR SALE: IBM OS/2 No
Date: 31 Dec 92 16:36:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Digital Underground - PRIVATE
Reply-To: copernicus@digund.uucp (Copernicus) 

CJC>In article <1hqtu0INN3cj@uwm.edu> tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mike Kretzer) wr
   >>IBM just messed up a recent order I made for the November Developer's
   >>Assistance Program CD-ROM and sent me two extra copies.  Instead of going
   >>through the bother of sending them back, I decided to see if anyone was
   >>interested in buying them from me (especially the folks outside of the USA
   >>where I hear these CD-ROMs are hard to find).
   >>
   >>I'm asking $25.00US for each (shipping incl.).  Send email to
   >>tanith@csd4.csd.uwm.edu if you are interested...
   >>

CJC>I'm Sorry but $25 is WAY WAY to much.  You can get the same thing from IBM 
   >$15 with shipping.  Actually the $15 is the shipping.  Order it today and
   >they'll send it second day air Federal Express.  Sorry to flame you but....

Can someone give me the number for IBM to get the OS/2 CD??

Chris Nalley / Copernicus@digund.uucp
---
 . QMPro 1.0 03-1234 . Digital Underground - Linux Support Board - 812-941-9427
                          
Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.misc:40840 comp.sys.novell:11007
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.novell
Subject: Re: Both protocols IPX/SPX and TCP/IP on OS/2 machine ?
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 20:03:13 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.networking
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1992Dec22.193214.12973@cs.tu-berlin.de> ernst@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de (Ernst Kloecker) writes:
>in my new project I need to have both protocols, IPX/SPX and TCP/IP, on one
>OS/2 machine with one network adapter (16-bit SMC). At the moment I am
>running OS/2 1.32. I will update to OS/2 2.1x later. The TCP/IP product I
>am using is IBM TCP/IP 1.21 for OS/2 1.32 and later.
>IPX/SPX is needed to connect to a Netware 3.1 server for both file access
>and access to an Oracle DBMS running on the Netware server.
>TCP/IP will be used for an RPC-based application and to import/export
>NFS file systems.
>I heard about ODI drivers for OS/2. Is that what I need or are there any
>better multi-protocol solutions ?

Either ODI or NDIS will do the trick.  In either case you need to
insert a "shim" driver to translate from one to the other.

OS/2 is probably the best platform for this application, and it does
work just fine.  In the past it has been a bit of a bear to configure,
but it does work quite well.  IBM now offers a product called Network
Transport Services/2 (list $55) which helps ease installation quite a
bit, and I suggest you look into it.  Combine that with IBM TCP/IP and
the Novell NetWare Workstation Kit for OS/2 2.0 and you're all set.
(I'm only familiar with OS/2 2.0, but the same principles apply to
OS/2 1.3, really.  I'm just not sure that NTS/2 works with OS/2 1.3 --
worth investigating.)

>The same problem will arise for DOS/Windows clients at a later stage of the
>project. Is there a similar solution ?

Well, yes you can get it working (after a bit of tedious
installation).  Is it worth it?  Probably not.  The OS/2 approach, to
say the least, is more elegant.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
From: h198@hosp.med.umich.edu  (Gene Mangum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: SoundBlaster and OS/2 2.1 beta's MMPM/2
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993  22:26 EDT
Organization: Univ of Michigan Hospitals
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: kestrel.hosp.med.umich.edu
X-Newsreader: FTPNuz (DOS) v1.0

I had problems with MMPM/2 on the OS/2 2.1 beta and my SoundBlaster.   The
programs were unable to open the Digital Audio and MIDI devices.   Installing
the drivers from OS2MMPM.ZIP did not help.   I moved the CONFIG.SYS lines
for MMPM/2 to the top of CONFIG.SYS, and now the players and recorders
work great!   Here are the first few lines of my CONFIG.SYS:
 
      IFS=D:\OS2\HPFS.IFS  /CACHE:256 /CRECL:4 /AUTOCHECK:E 
      DEVICE=D:\SBPCD2.SYS /P:240
      DEVICE=G:\MMOS2\SBP2D2.SYS 1 3 5 240 4
      SET MMBASE=G:\MMOS2;
      SET DSPPATH=G:\MMOS2\DSP;
      DEVICE=G:\MMOS2\SSMDD.SYS
      DEVICE=G:\MMOS2\ADSHDD.SYS
      PROTSHELL=D:\OS2\PMSHELL.EXE
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: dregeczi@fraser.sfu.ca (David Joseph Regeczi)
Subject: trid32.update.exe and ATI
Keywords: help
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 19:44:26 GMT

I have successfully managed to get the tri32new.zip drivers from hobbes to
work on an ATI XL24 but am having problems with the new trid32.update ones.
Upon following the instructions, I get to the installation screen which 
shows the primary and secondary display.  The choice shown on the primary
display is as follows:

Primary Display = Super Video Graphics Array (ATI)
Secondary Display = None

When I select "OK", it gives me the error message, "Display Driver Install
is not currently configured to install Super Video Graphics Array (ATI)".
I have tried to find something relating to ATI on the list if I try and
select a new driver but was not able to find anything relating to ATI.  Are
these official drivers only compatible with the Trident card now? 


|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| 
|   David Joseph Regeczi          |  But when a few people express the same  | 
|   Simon Fraser University       |  opinion I think it is worth listening - | 
|   Vancouver, BC, Canada         |  not in order to follow like sheep, but  |  
|   dregeczi@fraser.sfu.ca        |  in order to learn... - Nigel Kennedy    | 

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari)
Subject: Re: Reformat needed to install 2.1 over 2.1 beta?
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 22:11:03 GMT

In article <BAB.93Jan2144950@se39.wg2.waii.com> bab@se39.wg2.waii.com (Brian Button) writes:
>Before I go ahead and order the 2.1 beta, I wanted to get this
>question answered!
>
>Once 2.1 comes out, will we have to reformat our OS/2 partitions to
>install it over the beta?


	If I may, as a general comment, suggest that is it *always*
	preferable to install fresh than to attempt to install over a 
	previous version. 

	I have yet to see a good install-new-keep-old upgrade
	on a PC.  Win30-->31 was a mess, OS/2's beta 2.0 ---> GA
	wasn't so hot, either.  It may say that you can do it, but
	you're probably going to be better off if you spend the extra
	hour or two and just install fresh and configure.  

	I realize it sounds like a pain, but it saves
	you the chance of weird troubles later.  

	Or perhaps it's just that I heavily customize my systems.


-- 
	Blaming "society" for your problems is like blaming clouds for rain.
         ---  boycott == censorship == closed mindedness == cowardice  ---
	      "Psalms 23:1  The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want."  
		Shepherds are for sheep.   -----      Pain teaches.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: samiam@netcom.com (Scott Moore)
Subject: Re: Colorado's OS/2 solution for Jumbo is here!
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 07:59:54 GMT

I didn't see a price in that announcement. Do I gather correctly that it is
about $400 by the time you get through with all the special software needed ?
It seems to me you are getting close to the cost of a SCSI DC250 drive, 
which will blow the doors off a floppy controller driven drive, besides
being a more general purpose unit (special software is not required for SCSI
tapes). A hint for CMS would be: don't charge os/2 users a premium over
what windows folks pay.

                                          [sam]

PS. It's only fair to mention that I work for another tape drive company.

-- 
Scott A. Moore [SAM]  | "Cash is more 
samiam@netcom.com     | important than your 
Santa Cruz, CA USA    | mother"
408-423-1624          | Allan Shugart - CEO Segate Corp.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Distribution: world
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 20:00:04 -0800
From: David_Scott@f514.n202.z1.fidonet.org
Subject: Re: VIDEO_MODE_RESTRICTI
Comment-To: All@f514.n202.z1.fidonet.org
Reply-To: David_Scott@f514.n202.z1.fidonet.org
X-FSC-PATH: 202/514

ML>In article <1992Dec17.145356.27712@bmerh85.bnr.ca>
ML>mlord@bmers63.bnr.ca (Mark Lord) writes:
ML>>In article <1992Dec17.013514.2772@leland.Stanford.EDU>
ML>>wkn@leland.Stanford.EDU (Ken Neighbors) writes:
ML>>>I thought I'd set VIDEO_MODE_RESTRICTION to CGA so that I could
get
ML>>>96K more of memory for one of my text only DOS apps.  It now runs
ML>>>twice as slow (or half as fast :)
ML>>>
ML>>>Here's some data:
ML>>>restriction mem  time to run
ML>>>NONE  655360  16 seconds
ML>>>CGA  753664  33 seconds
ML>>>MONO  720896  33 seconds

Why does CGA give more available memory than MONO?  I thought it'd be
the other way.

David Scott
___
 X OLX 2.1 TD X RAM -- Randomly Absent Memory

--- Maximus/2 2.01wb
 * Origin: OS/2 Connection @ La Jolla, CA  <619-558-9475> (1:202/514)
From: davisar@memstvx1.memst.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: <None>
Keywords: ultrastor,syquest
Date: 2 Jan 93 16:02:48 GMT
Organization: Memphis State University

Does the Ultrastor 14f connected to a syquest drive [sq5110; 88mb 
removeable] already have drivers available to run from OS2/2.0 or
OS2/2.1; ie, can I easily attach these two to my Toshiba 5200/386-20
and expect them to run or would I have to chase down a solution over
the next two months?

If you have any idea [at all] could you past same to my "home" address:
//davisar@msuvx1.memst.edu// //bee-eye//
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Wanted: bits and bytes of HPFS
Keywords: HPFS
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 22:21:42 GMT

In article <1gqhspINNm7v@irz401.inf.tu-dresden.de> stoerr@freia.inf.tu-dresden.de writes:
>I'm looking for an exact description of the HPFS-Filesystem. Is there
>someone, who can help me and give me a pointer?(I need it, because
>I wanted to write a MSDOS-driver, which is able to read HPFS just like
>the DOS-Session does)

A list of references was posted recently.  I sent a copy to Barry
Jaspan (bjaspan@athena.mit.edu) who will be incorporating the list,
I'm sure, into the next Programmer's Edition of the OS/2 Frequently
Asked Questions List.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
From: marten@feki.toppoint.de (Marten Feldtmann)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Opinion:  What IBM should change in OS/2
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 92 12:36:06 GMT
Organization: Private OS/2 System

In article <1hq4dbINNsvs@cae.cad.gatech.edu> chris@cad.gatech.edu (Chris McClellen) writes:

>I would like to know all the capabilities of the system without having
>to order Redbooks.  Hell, DOS came with a manual.  I know OS/2 would

 Perhaps IBM should at least put the Redbooks as Online documentation
into the base package or split the base package into two packages:

 a) one as usual (but with the Redbooks online, with means at least two
    additinal discs, which increases the price again .. :-( )
 b) one with extra printed manuals and therefore much more expensive ... ?

 MF


--
Marten Feldtmann,     Kieler Str. 29,       2300 Kiel 14,    Germany
E-Mail: marten@tpki.toppoint.de, FAX possible
From: hmkirchh@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Hans-Joachim Kirchhoff)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Did microsoft really write an OS/2 "Terminator" crash prog?
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 08:44:46 GMT
Organization: CSD., University of Erlangen
NNTP-Posting-Host: faui00a.informatik.uni-erlangen.de

IBM's (unofficial) reaction to the MS terminator program went something
like this (quoting from memory)
"Why anyone would want to stay up day and night to write a terminator
program for OS/2, I cannot imagine. Windows comes with such built in."

Yes, I know this is polemic, but I just love it! :-) So, according to
my info (CIS, which is, where I think I read it), MS _DID_ write such
a program. (The quotation could be from J. Soyring, but I honestly cannot
say for sure).

-Hajo
---
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans-Jochen Kirchhoff | hmkirchh@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
> No signature today  | CompuServe 100024,712
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Subject: Re: SoundBlaster and OS/2 2.1 beta's MMPM/2
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 19:05:05 GMT

In article <19930102093916.h198@hosp.med.umich.edu> h198@hosp.med.umich.edu  (Gene Mangum) writes:
> In Article <1993Jan2.075120.5123@actrix.gen.nz> "Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz" says:
>  
>   [Stuff Deleted]
> > I have just tried this with my SB 2.0 (not Pro) and it didn't make any
> > difference. I don't have the CD DEVICE='s and my SBD2.SYS is followed by 1 5
> > 220 4 (as it should be according to the docs).  
> >  
> > But it still won't work. 
>  
>   Did you try the drivers from OS2MMPM.ZIP?   Maybe they did make some
>   difference after all!?

Hmmmm......what is "OS2MMPM.ZIP" and where did you get it? I have been using
the SB drivers that came with the 2.1 beta - OR - the SBMMPM2.ZIP that I have
downloaded (Twice....*groan*) from the Creative Labs BBS.

The September drivers from the CL BBS trap my system just after the OS/2
start-up logo. The December ones with the 2.1 beta just don't work at all.
 
The September ones worked fine with the GA+SP OS/2 and the version of MMPM/2
that I had bought. After installing the beta, however, I get TRAP D in AUDIO1$
*every* time.
 
Maybe this OS2MMPM.ZIP is the answer.......

I await your reply.....:-)
 
Steve
-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand |      
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         |        Space for rent.
+64 4 478 4714                          |   - cheap rates, nice location. 
**** Happy user of OS/2 b2.1 ****       | 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Subject: SB 2.0 and OS/2 b2.1 - It works!!!
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 03:15:49 GMT


Thanks to Naranapiti Karunaratne, I now have my SB working with the MMPM/2 in
the 2.1 beta.
 
You *must* install the M-Audio device support - but tell MMPM/2 you have zero
of these devices. You also say you have one SoundBlaster. 
 
Everything will work just fine fist time.......(a note about this in the
README would not have gone amiss).
 
So...if you have this problem....this is the answer - Thanks to Karu.
 
Steve (.WAV-ing into the sunset......)
 




-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand |      
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         |        Space for rent.
+64 4 478 4714                          |   - cheap rates, nice location. 
**** Happy user of OS/2 b2.1 ****       |
From: benezra_a@spcvxb.spc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Help with ansi.sys in dos mode
Date: 30 Dec 92 05:02:32 GMT
Organization: St. Peter's College, US

In article <baloo.725667761@mik.uky.edu>, baloo@nx01.mik.uky.edu (kevin s coupal) writes:
> I added a device line to my config.sys for ansi.sys and i rebooted my machine
> but i still didn't get any ansi.sys in memory.  Maybe i put the command in the wrong
> config.sys?  I'm lost.  Anyone know?  Or perhaps there is an ansi.exe that
> i could use instead of the dos one?

Device=d:\os2\mdos\ansi.sys
Try that.
Alan Benezra
From: rider@geloser.login.qc.ca (Serge Ayotte)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: 2nd phisical drive and boot manager
Date: 1 Jan 93 15:51:47 GMT
Organization: Gentleman Loser System, Montreal/Qc/Cdn

Hy folks!!

I switch a few weeks ago one of my 2 HD (40mb to 130mb... Haaaaa the joy
of 170mb total now!), and since I didn't want to much headeaches (yeah,
right!) I put it as the 2nd physical drive(slave, btw that one is a
Maxtor 7120AT, the master is a... heeee, Seagate maybe? and using FAT
only).

On COLD boot, I have no problem what so ever, but as soon as I do a WARM
boot (3 finger salute, the RESET switch, or DUAL BOOT) then the troubles
start... (get a "D: drive failure, push F1" after waiting 2 to 3 minutes
on the "WAIT..." after the reboot, I press it, then another 2 minutes to
get a Non-bootable disk message, press any key and then the system
restarts). I called Maxtor and it seems to be a knowned
incompatibilty(sp??) problem of those 2 brands set as I have them, the
solution is to switch. At that time, I thought that I could live with
this...

So after 2 weeks of this I am getting fed up, so I am thinking of
switching them around BUT I don't feel like having to re-install every
thing (i.e for partition size reason, I would be stuck with a D drive of
only 40mb wich is NOT enough for putting everything I want on D, it is
at the moment 55) and then having to redo every object related to those
prg since I would have to make my application/data drive as E.

So I'm wondering, can the BOOT MANAGER take a 2nd physical drive and
make the system beleive that's the one to boot DOS from, i.e I would
like to install on the first physical drive the BM partion, OS/2 system
partition and the other's partition I would need (Drives letter D,
E[this would be the swap partition], and F),then the second physical
drive would be 10mb containing the DOS boot and 30mb non-OS/2 compat
drive,hopefully this could be set as G( or can someone tell me what this
one would be??).

Is this possible?? and if so, can I easilly back-up my wps and reestore
it to it's present setting? (most probably using wpsbackup utilities?).
I can of imagine in advance that the rest could have to be redone a bit
too, but since I will be staying in FAT, it's just a question of using
CPBACKUP to get them and reput them till I don't need to touch D and F I
shall be OK (F being my partiton containing my Internet news/mail prg
and storage area).

Thanks for your help and tips, and my apologies if this was long winded.

Serge Ayotte

System failure (A)bort (I)gnore (R)etry (S)hoot
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| rider@geloser.login.qc.ca | Gentleman Loser System, Montreal, Qc, Canada |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: Alan_York@mindlink.bc.ca (Alan York)
Subject: Re: OS/2 and Logitech mice?
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 02:27:15 GMT

Hi. I've been using a Logitech Trackman for a year now with OS/2, and it
works just fine using the IBM provided mouse drivers.
--
==============================================================================

 From:  Alan B. York              |  Dynamic Datacorp People
        alan_york@mindlink.bc.ca  |  Vancouver, B.C., Canada    604/294-9193
------------------------------------------------------------------------------