From: sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us (Jack Sarfatti)
Subject: Showdown at the OK Corral - Sarfatti vs D. Wollf
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 01:35:18 GMT


Mr. Wolff,
Be advised that I am checking your credit for assets and it is my intention
to bring a lawsuit for malicious slander, libel and defamation of character
against you personally and against your employer Computervision.

Your have screwed yourself, wiseguy, by your remark:
"I've also taken the liberty of putting a few of your words in all-caps."
whose intent and implication is to portray me as a crackpot by willful
malicious distortion of my actual text which is, I assume, privileged
intellectual property.

You are free to give your opinion, but you are not free under the law to
distort my text with malicious intent as you have clearly done in public.

At the very least you have displayed poor judgement in your Employer's eyes
by using their
id and making hem party to a very interesting lawsuit breaking new ground
in the protection of
intellectual property on usenet.

At the very least I will be happy to hear that you have been fired by
Computervision.  If they fire you, I will not name them in the lawsuit. I
will be contacting the CEO of your company shortly. And let this be a
warning to anyother half-cocked computer cowboys out there. In the old west
these matters of honor were settled with six-guns, today it is expensive
lawsuits - and I enjoy litigation!  Like Dirty Harry said: "Make myday!"
I'm brimming with Christmas Spirit!

For the record - as of this date Dec 25, 1992, I would not award myself the
Nobel Prize in physics, nor do I think I deserve one, nor have I ever
implied as much. The reason I do not deserve a Nobel Prize is that my
prediction that quantum connection communication is possible, in
particular, that the polarization of one photon in a photon pair can be
controlled at a distance according to the specific formular sin2@cos7& (@&
defined elsewhere) from the timelike future as well outside the lightcone,
has not been confirmed by experiment.

If, one day,my specific prediction with my specific device is confirmed
then no doubt many would think I should get the Nobel Prize - but that is,
at this time, purely hypothetical fantasy,  for you Mr Wolf to distort my
text so as to make it appear otherwise is a rape of my mind!

From: dwolff@res-c4.Prime.COM (David Wolff)
Subject: re: Dale Bass on The Good, the Bad, and The Bogus
Followup-To: alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Organization: Computervision
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 15:56:58 GMT

--MORE--(24%)In article <Bzqt7u.4pA@well.sf.ca.us>, sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us
(Jack Sarfatti) wr
ites:
>
> No, the situation IS not that simple. My point about Gardner's article is
> that I was an OBSCURE asst prof at SAN Diego STATE until I became a
> useful IDIOT of un-named intelligence agencies - a pawn IN a vast
> GEO-political game - some OF the SPOOKS revealed themselves to me in the
> mid-80's. Gardner was part of this COVERT intelligence operation because
> HIS article, more THAN ANY other factor, put me "in the thick of it" -
> to quote British Intelligence agent Dennis Bardens in a REMARK to me
> in Blue BOAR Inn Cambridge UK spring of 74' the full remark was
> "Dr. SARFATTI, it is MY duty TO inform YOU of A psychic WAR raging ACROSS
> the CONTINENTS between THE Soviet UNION and YOUR country AND you ARE to
BE
> in THE thick OF it."

I think you forgot to mention that you deserve the Nobel Prize and that
"they laughed at Newton and Einstein."  I've also taken the liberty of
putting a few of your words in all-caps.

(Also removed most of the newsgroups from Newsgroups:.)

David Wolff

dwolff@RES-C4.Prime.COM
--MORE--(82%)End of article 1325 (of 1326)--what next? [npq]

Restriction sci.physics still in effect.

******** End of newsgroups--what next? [npq]
!

OK (type a command or type  opt  for Options): m
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories,alt.paranormal,sci.skeptic,alt.conspiracy