HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: donnell@manowar.micro.umn.edu (BogusMan)
Subject: Re: Nitrous Oxide
Organization: none
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 21:30:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct30.032646.16814@muddcs.claremont.edu> ileicht@jarthur.claremont.edu (Spiff) writes:
>While that may be true of Federal Regulations, it is misleading because many states
>have their own laws about nitrous. I was at a friend's house who is studying law, so
>I took the oppurtunity to browse through the california penal code looking for laws
>that might be of interest to me. I don't have the exact quote so I will just summarize
>it.
>
>It is illegal to purchase nitrous (unless you are a doctor) with the intent of using it
>on your body. Therefore you can buy it, legally. But you can't inhale it. :)
>I don't know how the police could prove that you intended to inhale it, maybe if they
>saw a bunch of baloons around in the room. Is there any use for nitrous baloons other
>than inhaling? QUick! someomne come up with an alebei(sp!).
>
Easy one. The balloons commonly sold as "nitrous Balloons" are the same as
the inflated ones with a rubber band on them, commonly known as "Punchballs".
At least the ones that I have seen...
Trusting with love in the Lard Cheeses...

					--Judex--
From: lamontg@stein.u.washington.edu (Lamont Granquist)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: NATURAL ANTI-cancer/AIDS Remedies
Date: 13 Nov 92 19:10:39 GMT
Organization: 'Operation: Mindcrime'

trif@bike.rad.washington.edu (To Run In Fear) writes:
>A lot of what is on the list looks harmless, though anything can be harmful
>if taken to extremes.  I would suggest that those interested in trying these
>methods ask a doctor if the method is harmful and in what way (though I
>doubt any doctor would have a problem with eating several almonds a day---
>the almond growers would love it though).  Thus an informed decision can
>be made.

I was particularly impressed by the herpes vaccine.

Studies that people claim "show" these things often show nothing of the
sort.  Most of the time they're some in vitro result that may or may not
have any correlation to effects on humans.  There is a generally a
considerable amount of casual speculation that one has to travel through to
reach the conclusion that these studies "show" something.

An example off the top of my head would be that marijuana causes testicular
damage.  The logic is that since it has been shown that marijuana
gets stored in fat tissues, and since the testicles have considerable
amounts of fat cells, it must be true that marijuana concentrates in the
fat cells, and causes damage.  It wrong for one reason because it assumes
that the presence would cause damage.  And its wrong for a more important
reason because its been shown (by Nahas no less) that the blood-testicular
barrier is effective at keeping marijuana from concentrating in the testes.
Likewise the same for the blood-brain barrier.

Similar leaps of faith probably occur in most of the claims that were
in the posted article.
 
-- 
Lamont Granquist  lamontg@u.washington.edu
  "When dogma enters the brain, all intellectual activity ceases."
                                      -- Robert Anton Wilson
From: greg@antizen.EBay.Sun.COM
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: Ephadrine
Date: 12 Nov 92 22:39:40 GMT
Reply-To: greg@antizen.EBay.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems Federal, Milpitas, CA.
NNTP-Posting-Host: antizen.ebay.sun.com

Ephedrine is an adrenergic drug that works by stimulating alpha
and beta receptors thus causing the release of norepinephrine.
Alpha and beta receptors exist in the sympathetic nervous system,
(fight or flight) and stimulation causes increased heart rate,
bronchodilation, and vasoconstriction.

Ephedrine is the oral form of Epinephrine, or adrenaline. It was
once a commonly prescribed drug for asthma, but newer drugs in the
xanthine class have less side effects.

Ephedrine is related to pseudoephedrine which was designed as a 
decongestant with less undesirable effects. 

Ephedra is a Chinese herb that's been used for centuries to treat
asthma.

Rather than purchasing it through mail order, you might want to 
ask the local pharmicist for Ephedrine sulfate in the 100 capsule
bottles as it's much cheaper that way. Though more difficult to find,
ephedrine is kept as a 'behind-the-counter' drug. Legal to purchase
without a Rx, but not put out on display.

Ephedrine taken with caffeine is a more pleasant stimulant combination
however be aware of the warnings concerning adrenergic drugs, which you
can discuss with someone qualified and licensed to do so.

Greg
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: Sancho Panza
Subject: Dexy
Organization: University of Missouri
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 92 21:26:26 CST

Howdy.  I have noticed of late a bit of wondering about "Roboing" and
why anyone would do it.  Well, a year or so ago, I took Tylenol for
Cold.  It contains Dextromethorphan.  I, in an effort to reduce my cold,
took more than I was supposed to.  It bestowed upon my naiive mind quite
a buzz.  However, Tylenol's most significant ingredient, that is, the
chemical in all Tylenol, is acetaminophen.  I looked up the effects of
all Tylenol for Cold's ingredients, and this common painkiller posed
a hazard:  According to "Complete Guide to Prescription and Non-
Prescription Drugs" by H. Winter Griffith, M.D. (c HP Books, 1985),
acetaminophen may damage the blood system causing anemia.  Well shoot,
I'm hypoglycemic to start, so let's not mess with blood.
So I consulted the list of other products containing D-Methorphan.
It seems Vicks Formula 44D contains it along with Pseudoephedrin, which
as long as one monitor's the heart, there is little threat.
Of course I don't condone the use of it other than as directed by the
packaging or a physician, but I felt like experimenting, and it was
at the very least, pleasant.  Kind of like the good effects of alcohol
without the loss of cerebral order.  It was easier to dissect music, and
enjoy it in this manner (Rennaissance being a choice group for the
occasion).  It also induced occasional "pleasure tremors".  Not physical
tremors so to speak, but a dynamic feeling of euphoria.  At any rate,
it was enjoyable, though I don't suspect it would be a replacement
for more normal paths of entertainment.
 
There, that is one person who has enjoyed D-M's (Not Danger Mouse)
recreational application.
 
 
Later,
 
Sancho Panza
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Nothing I say is true ever ever ever and nobody belives me
when it is anyway, so don't you start...
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Monday, 9 Nov 1992 22:18:07 EST
From: <IO20639@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: Menthol! was Re: Snow Bong! (was Bong ideas)
 <1992Nov7.034214.23238@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
 <1992Nov7.074428.3242@henson.cc.wwu.edu>

Where on earth did you get that little gem of a fact?  since when does
alcohol remove THC?  My FOAF tried a bong with Southern Comfort, and I can
attest to the fact that the THC was deffinately still in the smoke. Please,
if I am wrong, let me know!

peace

the bushman
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Tig Stone)
Subject: Re: Acid activities
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
	<1ddkosINNji2@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 01:48:03 GMT


In article <1ddkosINNji2@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU> jcollier@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU (John Donald Collier) writes:

> From my experience, C is likely to make you less paranoid if you
> are so inclined. Can make the trip more pleasant, less tiring.

	Yeah, it's so much better than that nasty Fortran or Pascal.


:)

--
Tig Stone 
(oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
Subject: Re: Nitrous Oxide
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 07:14:13 GMT

gaspar@inf.ethz.ch (gaspo) writes:
: >
: >	this is off the track a little but i have heard rumors that
: >	you can get little containers of NO2  five of them for 2.00 dollars
: >	and each caontainer has the equilivent of one whipped cream can.
: 
: sorry, this is not a rumor.  this is the truth.  or, at least the best
: resemblance I can find.

Well, they are not filled with NO2. The rest may be true.

Bill
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: ulma@coli.uni-sb.de (Ulrich Mayring)
Subject: Re: Intro to Extasy
Organization: U of Saarbruecken, Dept. of Computational Linguistics
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 23:21:13 GMT

lamontg@stein.u.washington.edu (Lamont Granquist) writes:


>Re:  The harshness of the response...

>"ooops, looks like she was taking a MAOI...  call the coroner..."

>-or-

>"I wouldn't have given you it if I knew you were pregnant!" 

>I think the responses were appropriate...  sympathomimetics with unknown
>teratogenicity are not things to dose others with.

Ok, I rest my case. I didn't know X was a sympathomimetic with unknown
teratogenicity. Sorry.


     Ulrich Mayring

       - KRAWEHL, KRAWEHL! Taubtrueber Ginst am Usenhain! -

Newsgroups: alt.drugs,alt.magnus.and.ketil,alt.fan.mike-jittlov
From: magnus@bark-fddi.ii.uib.no (Magnus Alvestad)
Subject: Re: TESTING
Reply-To: magnus@ii.uib.no
Organization: UVBS -> SFK/T-DSA / SOPS - HOS / RNoN
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 04:26:50 GMT

>>>>> On Wed, 11 Nov 1992 20:00:54 GMT, bcash@crchh410.BNR.CA (Brian
>>>>> Cash) said:

	|>              "Your nothing unless you got Speed"

	Brian> "My nothing unless I got Speed"?
	Brian> If spelling is what you were testing, you got a B.
	Brian> (Speling miztkes ar OKy inn an poste, butt knot inn you're .sigg!)

You dumbo! He had to misspell it to avoid the wrath of the DEA. Anyway
it wasn't attributed. If I'm not wrong, I think Joney 'Bahaa' Wilson
said this in Harlem a few weeks ago, altough a dot or two different:

	'You ain't nothing, man, if you ain't got speed!'

or it could have been the Wizard, of course. The Wizard of Speed and
Time. Which will also have to look out for the DEA. This is the second
drug link in a week.. :-|

-Magnus (Just say !)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez)
Subject: Re: A quick question...
Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 04:36:26 GMT

In article <1992Nov7.181646.22829@linus.mitre.org> lewis@aera8700.mitre.org (Keith Lewis) writes:

>At the risk of preaching the obvious, if you don't enjoy smoking, don't.  It
>will leave that much more for your giggling friends.  (If *they* have a
>problem with you not smoking, find new friends.)

Hmm, maybe someone should come up with a nice bumper sticker or t-shirt
along these lines, something like "Don't do drugs - save 'em for us" or
"Just say no - there's not enough for both of us".  I can't think of
something sufficiently catchy just now.


Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: pwh@bradley.bradley.edu (Pete Hartman)
Subject: Re: Acid activities
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 18:17:52 GMT

I *have* heard from someone whose medical training I trust
that Niacin (B-3 I believe) flushes toxins out of your system.
This would include anything abnormal like LSD.  The person who
told me this said that she would take ~2000mg (4 tablets) of
Niacin after any kind of radiation exposure (X rays, CAT scan,
etc), or would take it after a trip to be sure to clean out her
system.  Side effects are supposed to be flushing and an itching
sensation, but she said they are brief.
-- 
Pete Hartman		       Bradley University	pwh@bradley.bradley.edu
                                Ma gavte la nata
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: ulma@coli.uni-sb.de (Ulrich Mayring)
Subject: MJ recipe FAQ
Organization: U of Saarbruecken, Dept. of Computational Linguistics
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 23:40:40 GMT

A FOAF is wondering about the promised MJ recipe FAQ, not for any specific
reason and it doesn't matter if the answer, unnecessary as it is, takes
weeks.

It would be totally indifferent if someone mailed my FOAF an advance copy,
since he wouldn't read it anyway.

Thanks,


     Ulrich Mayring
From: IO91747@MAINE.MAINE.EDU
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: Nutmeg!!??
Date: 6 Nov 92 21:40:01 GMT
Organization: University of Maine System

a friend  and i ate a whole storebought jar of nutmeg each.  it  was quite a bi
we choked it down by mixing it into McDonald's shakes.  Took  about  2 hours to
completely  messed  up,  hallucinating, giddiness, heavy stone.   But it  was n
worth the  48 hour hangover that went with it. needless to say i have a hard
time drinking McD's shakes now.
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: jon@cyclone.MITRE.org (J. E. Shum)
Subject: Re: sad sad very sad
Originator: jon@cyclone
Organization: The MITRE Corp. McLean Va.
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:21:17 GMT


In article <1992Nov11.105042.1258@dct.ac.uk>, mcsdc1rs@dct.ac.uk writes:
> no drugs should be used for enjoyment
> if you take drugs there must be something missing in your life

Thank you for your opinion.  However, unless you can back it up
with objective evidence, I'm afraid I will have to ask you to
leave us alone. 


-- 
<jon@mitre.org>|--24HR Libertarian Party News (900)454-2378 [$1.95 a minute]--
----------------------------------| Libertarian Party            (800)272-1776 
          DON'T BLAME ME!         | 1528 Pennsylvania Avenue SE  (202)543-1988
       I voted Libertarian.       | Washington, DC 20003         (800)682-1776  
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: andersom@spot.Colorado.EDU (Marc Anderson)
Subject: Re: Using LSD while on Probation in CA
Keywords: LSD DUI probation blood test
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: alt
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 23:54:21 GMT

In article <6427@ucsbcsl.ucsb.edu> 6500ehh@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Edward Hagen) writes:
>A friend on probation for a DUI in California must give weekly blood
>samples.  Can he use LSD without getting caught?

my friend does without problem...

the interesting thing was that he asked if marijuana would be tested for and
they said "no -- only alcohol," so he now gets high also, and been harassed
or anything. dunno.

-marc


Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: louray@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Panayiotakis)
Subject: Re: Acid activities
Organization: George Washington University
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 17:22:23 GMT

Try watching cartoons (Hoghorn Leghorn (WB), mypreference) on slo motion.

Newsgroups: alt.drugs,misc.consumers
From: guru@camelot.bradley.edu (Jerry Whelan)
Subject: Doctor ripoff, or just reality?
Organization: The Smelly Ditch
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 21:42:07 GMT

	I went to a dermatologist the other day with a friend.
We needed a perscription for a `bleaching agent' to treat
some spots left over from a severe (98%) case of vitiligo
(a disease that stops pigmentation of the skin, otherwise
not particularly harmful).
	By the time we were out of there, we were out $200.
We felt ripped off.  I'd like to know if this is consistent
with normal dermatology treatment or not.  Here is what
we got out of it:

	1) 5 minutes with the doctor.  During the time he
	   told us what we already knew, that it was a severe
	   case of vitiligo and that we should use some
	   bleaching cream.
	2) A blood sample taken (fairly ineptly too, the
	   wound still ached 8 hours later) to test for
	   thyroid problems.
	3) A $34 6.5 oz jar of hand and body cream that
	   contains glycolic acid.
	4) A prescription for a second type of cream that
	   contains hydroquinone.  They wanted to sell it
	   to us at the clinic for $16.

	We were told that the bill for a first time office
visit would be $55 for `one skin disorder.'  Apparently
because a blood sample was drawn, that first time visit
went up to $80 plus a $16 `drawing fee' and then two
$15 lab tests.  There were some other indecipherable
charges on the receipt as well.
	We expect that this stuff will be covered by the health
insurance company, but we are still a bit enraged at this pricing.

	So tell me, is this normal, or is the doctor screwing
us over?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
``written by a drunken insane pathological liar''        guru@stasi.bradley.edu
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: ap.6170@cupid.sai.com (Anonymous)
Subject: [anonymous] Growing Ganja in the Great Outdoors
Originator: lamontg@hardy.u.washington.edu
Keywords: anonymous
Reply-To: ap.6170@cupid.sai.com
Organization: Somewhere
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 08:13:51 GMT


Anyone have hints on growing outside? Yeah, I know, stick the seeds in the
ground and come back in a few months :) -- Any other suggestions, like
density of seeds, the best months to plant in, the best type of soil, etc.

Mercy buckets

-- 
To post anonymously to alt.drugs send a message to ap.4151@cupid.sai.com.
All lines after a line containing only "--" will be stripped.
Remember:  These articles are anonymous, but not secure. 
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: lamontg@stein.u.washington.edu (Lamont Granquist)
Subject: Re: Acid activities (Vitamin C)
Organization: 'Operation: Mindcrime'
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 08:16:08 GMT

Question:  isn't Vitamin C an antioxidant or radical scavenger or something
along those lines?

-- 
Lamont Granquist  lamontg@u.washington.edu
  "When dogma enters the brain, all intellectual activity ceases."
                                      -- Robert Anton Wilson

Xref: sparky alt.drugs:17883 talk.politics.drugs:7310 talk.politics.guns:23568 alt.folklore.urban:27456
From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,talk.politics.drugs,talk.politics.guns,alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Junkies/crack addicts don't try to share the fun?
Date: 5 Nov 92 20:57:44 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA

ambidge@ecf.toronto.edu (Chris Ambidge) writes:

: >>If you can find leaded gasoline. It is rare or non-existant, in most
: >>states.
: >>
: >>Bill
: >
: >	Problem is, this alleged incident happened somewhere in Ontario.
: >Ontario is not yet (until the Canadian civil war) a state.
: 
: 		Thank  you.
: >
: >J.P. "Canadians have high octane raison boxes" Papai
: 
: You  can't find leaded gasoline here in  Ontario, either

Thanks for the verification. 

Has anyone heard anything further on this? It is, more and more, appearing
to be just another false claim.

Bill
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,talk.politics.drugs,talk.politics.guns
From: andersom@spot.Colorado.EDU (Marc Anderson)
Subject: Re: Junkies/crack addicts don't try to share the fun?
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 19:41:45 GMT

In article <BwqyEr.In0@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> kari@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Kari) writes:
>In article <jah.719915537@mits> jah@mits.mdata.fi (Jani A. Heinonen) writes:
>>billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:
>>
>>on their acid habit? Sheesh...
>
>>>Even further, lsd is not addicting.
>>
>>   I suppose you mean that it isn't physically addicting, right? Neither
>>is cocaine, at least as far as I know.
>>
>>Jani Heinonen 
>
>I beleive that the Surgeon General's report on both cocaine and lsd will show
>the contrary.  Cocaine IS PHYSICALLY addicting because it releases endorohines
><sp> in the brain that produce pleasure and other various effects.  The brain

cocaine is not physically addictive.  there is no physical resonance 
associated with cocaine use.  

you are confusing cocaine with heroin -- heroin releases endorphins.. as far
as I know (correct me if I'm wrong), cocaine does not, and has a different
course of action.

>according to the Surgeon General's report IS NOT PHYSICALLY addictive because

which Surgeon General's report is this?

>cocaine and lsd are PSCHOLOGICALLY addictive.  This is what I can vaguely
>recallfrom a long discussion on lsd a while back, so forgive me if I am in 
>error.  

Oh really?  I've used LSD and don't consider myself psychologically addicted
to it.  People are addictable -- drugs are not addictive.

>Kari the hopefully helpful

-marc anderson
andersom@spot.colorado.edu


Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: donnell@tuna.micro.umn.edu (BogusMan)
Subject: Re: Menthol! was Re: Snow Bong! (was Bong ideas)
Keywords: hope
Organization: none
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 18:49:26 GMT

In article <1992Nov7.074428.3242@henson.cc.wwu.edu> n9020351@henson.cc.wwu.edu (James Douglas Del-Vecchio) writes:
>kisaacso@nyx.cs.du.edu (Kevin "Zonker" Isaacson) writes:
>
>>For an interesting effect, try filling a bong or water pipe with pepermint
>>Schnapps.  Nice if you like menthol flavor bong hits.
>
>Takes that nasty THC out of the smoke.
>JD

Works for me, and you get a real nice buzz when you drink the schnapps!

					--Judex--

Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: n9020351@henson.cc.wwu.edu (James Douglas Del-Vecchio)
Subject: Re: DMSO as carrier?
Organization: Western Washington University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 07:21:44 GMT

Seth Malcolm Redmore <sr2s+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

>DMSO will carry "stuff" through the skin with it, however
>its use in transderm patches is limited to those drugs which
>require < 10-15 mg per day.  (Yes, I'll get the reference on this,
>if anyone cares.)

So what else is used in transderm patches, or is that it?
What's the ref, btw?
From: ebail@ctp.com (Erik Bailey)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: FAQ
Date: 10 Nov 92 20:29:47 GMT
Organization: Cambridge Technology Partners

In article <10943@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> michaeln@cs.uq.oz.au writes:
>[Dammit - just deleted my copy of the a.d faq]
>
>Quickie :
>	Recommended storage for A is cool, dark, anhydrous.
>	(all fairly obvious)
>
>	Given this, what's its shelf-life?

The FAQ says something along the lines of "store in cool, dark, dry place
using multiple redundant seals [ie bag inside bag inside plastic container]
and it should last at least a presidential term".

--Erik

-- 
Erik Bailey   | Cambridge Technology Partners      | The usual disclaimer
              | 304 Vassar St., Cambridge MA 02139 | applies: this post is
ebail@ctp.com | (617) 374-8418                     | mine, not my employer's.
      /earth is 98% full; please remove any excess inhabitants.
From: ck041@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Kevin Currie)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Growing Weed
Date: 8 Nov 1992 23:47:45 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


	Is there an FAQ on pot growing?  I want to know how to grow
on indoors...   

	Does anybody know anything???

-- 
"Chalk up another soul that's lost, |        
 Calculate the socal cost,          |      Kevin Currie
 You know what's not inside of me,  | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
 Raging mad insanity!!"  - S.T.     | ck041@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
Subject: Re: [anonymous] Robo Madness
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 01:13:59 GMT

gak@wrs.com (Richard Stueven) writes:
: 
: Has *anybody* ever caught a good buzz off this stuff?  Every
: robo-article I see here talks about how much it sucks and how sick they
: got.

Yeah.  Nothing incredible, no visuals, music is enhanced and the
feeling can most closely be compared with drunk but without the
aggression or occasional melancholia.  I did not get sick or have any
particularly negative reaction.  I sorta liked it.  This is not
something that I would either recommend or disrecommend but I've done
it several times.  Not sure I will again or not.  How's that for
ambivalent?

: 
: Buy some Real Drugs, folks!  They're cheaper, and some of them are
: actually fun!
: 

Were it only that easy. :-)

Bob
-- 
Bob Cain    rcain@netcom.com   408-358-2007

        "One can learn to be alone, even enjoy it but let intimacy
         break that solitude, even briefly, and he must start all
         over again."

                                                     Elia Kazan


               PGP 1.0 or 2.0 public key available on request.