From: >>>>>> Anonymous
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Reply to bApagA [(c) bApagA, 2556, 1993, 14??, 1371, 148] (III) [sci-anon-poster]
Date: 23 Jan 93 02:06:44 GMT
Organization: Notgheh MajjAni, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: handel
To: sci-anon-poster
Originator: daemon@handel


bApagA jAn(I really like it):

>dorood bar to bAd, ShahrAm.  Thanks for the correction.  As for the ghatreh
>let me explain a little.  The point is there is no dogma about language
>(no, I don't imply you said such a thing, not at all).  Let's all repeat
>the expression with 'ghatreh' everyday and in any occasion may it become
>part of our expressions and then the language.  I am only proposing this
>to those souls who see no harm in it.  Habit and repetition brings about
>behaviours that we would label as right or wrong, bad or good.

You can do anything you want to. This is a free country and I like it when
I see that you can do it without being accused of having "khAenAneh"
intentions. I was just trying to tell you that based on what I see, your
knowledge of Arabic is better than your knowledge of fArsi and you are
more interedted in Arabic. Of course, there is nothing wrong with it. It
depends on individual's choice and taste.

>I see the plug now [(c) Shahrokh, 92], I hope.  You thought I meant to
>choose bargozidegi to fit the sentence Mr. Ebrahimi had written.  Well,
>I see why you are saying I am changing my word.  The clarification is that
>	...

You got the wrong plug! I explained that change in what I mailed yesterday.
I am sorry that I have been replying to your posts in the reverse order.

>I agree with you 100% in the above, but your very well presented argument
>in the above does not make sense to somebody (say an Arab speaking person)
>who just happens (say by act of God) not to be Iranian and hence does not
>follow your line of thinking about classification of meanings.  This
>	...

But Shahrokh said that the sci-poster service would post received articles in
soc.culture.iranian. Shahrokh..??

>About underlined brakets:
>These were trigger brackets; they worked!  As for their usage the intention
>was not to confront Persian language.  I was trying to signal you that while
>	...

I was convinced that it was your intention to confront... But now that you say
this wasn't the case, I believe you.

>	...
>to use them because the Arabic words were meaningful to me.  The point in 

If I knew Arabic better than fArsi, I would say the same thing. Even Arabs
find Arabic words more meaningful!

>this exercise was to convey to the reader this thought that what sounds so
>strange to some readers (or even intimidating at times) might not be the
>case for another reader.  It all depends on how much we feel in touch with
>	...

What a discovery! You mean that you went through all those brackets just to
show us that point?


____________________________ THE END ___________________________


Before I close this discussion, there is something that I would like you
to know. I want you to know that I enjoyed it very much and I really like
you (don't get me wrong!) and your sense of humor. But this is getting too
long (we may have bored the ahAly to death) and we are getting into a
different subject. 

For the next few weeks I will only take part in articles related to poetry,
because I need something to relax me. I won't need extra excitement.

Thank you very much AgA bApagA (I mean it)

ShahrAm





 
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
|E-mail *anonymous* posts to : sci-anon-poster@handel.sun.com
|E-mail regular posts to     : sci-poster@handel.sun.com
|E-mail anonymity checks to  : sci-anon-poster-ping@handel.sun.com
|E-mail problems to          : smortaz@handel.sun.com
|Anon posts: lines after two dashes starting in col 1 are removed. 
| 	    >> Test before posting anonymously! <<