HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lli+@cs.cmu.edu (Lori Iannamico)
Subject: Re: The Miami ???? vs the Anaheim ?????
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 20:03:08 GMT

>In article <Dec11.203916.75289@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> smith%sol.dnet@sirius.
>cira.colostate.edu writes:
>>In article <1992Dec11.170111.20032@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca>, cs902159@ariel.
>yorku.ca (DAVID A LISOGURSKI) writes:
>>>
>>>Anyone have any ideas for nicknames for the new teams?

>>             Miami
>>             1) Traffickers
>>             2) Coral
>>             3) Tropics
>>             4) Southiques 

Hmmm, how about the "Rewinds"?  

Lori
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: patrick@psych.toronto.edu (Patrick Keelan)
Subject: Re: Why Wayne should NOT return (Kindling)
Organization: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 18:52:08 GMT

In article <1gsp64INN31c@fnnews.fnal.gov> jeffk@cdibm.fnal.gov (Dr. J) writes:
>I'm sort of tiring of the Penguin drivel, so I offer some holiday cheer.  Get 
>those blow torches ready.  Here's why the Great One should concentrate on Janet 
>& the kids and his new career as an entrepeneur.
>
>1. The Kings are having a great year anyway (attendance-wise and hockey-wise). 
>   I guess it's possible for him to make a significant contribution, but it 
>   seems unlikely to me.
>
>2. He could be risking serious injury.
>
>3. He has nothing left to accomplish, and certainly nothing to prove.
>
>4. There is some risk of him becoming a cartoon.  At one point during last
>   season (Februaru or so), 1/3 of his goals were empty-netters (8 of 23, I 
>   think).  This is preposterous for a man who is not only the greatest player
>   ever, but has always been synonomous with "Class".  Time to let it go, Wayne.
>   It's been terrific, but we have Mario, Jeremy, Sakic, et. al.
>-- 
>============================================================================
Points 2 & 3 are certainly worth considering, but I disagree with you
on #'s 1 and 4 to a large extent.  Yes, the Kings are having a great
year.  However, if you're suggesting that adding arguably the 
greatest player of all time to their lineup won't improve them further,
I disagree.  As to point #4, if you're going to argue that his performance
of last year suggests he would be an embarrassment if he came back this
year, let's look at his overall production--not just the obscure statistic
that you brought up.  The facts are that he scored 121 points in 74
games, and finished third in the scoring race.  If those kind of
stats suggest he should retire, then I guess everyone except Lemieux
and Kevin Stevens should join him in retirement.  If you think he
should hang 'em up because he's tarnishing the image of himself as
the dominant player in the game by continuing, well, that's another 
issue.  I do prefer to remember him as he was in Edmonton, when
no one in the league came close to him.

-Pat K.
 U. of Toronto

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: mccubbin@connext.ucs.sfu.ca (Bruce McCubbin)
Subject: Re: The Expansion 
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 14:57:55 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.112422.19505@cs.ucf.edu> wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson)  
writes:
> harrison@mpr.ca (Jeff Harrison) wrote:
> >As an aside, I vote for the "Miami Vice".
> 
> They can put some sort of symbol for ice on it and for the "V" they can !BUY!
> the rights to Vancouver's old V. If that won't spell the demise of the
> franchise, nothing will. 8-)
> 
Maybe they can lure Rick Blight out of retirement.
From: nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: BOSTON: Ruzicka Trade Suggestions?
Date: 16 Dec 92 18:15:31 GMT
Organization: HMS


Stan Fischler will be calling in to Dale Arnold's weekly "Talking Hockey"
show on Thursday,sometime between 10am-1pm.(590AM if you live in Greater
Boston;1440 for those of you in the WPI area). Maybe Stan The Man will
give us more inside scoop on a mysterious absense of Rosie. To sit out
7 games with a minor groin pull and to skate for 40mins in practice during
that time is a little fishy. I really think Rosie's days are numbered
and from Milbury's and Sutter's open comments in both Boston dailies it
appears Rosie has become an unnecessary pest for the B's.

Also,Gary Bettman, a new NHL comissioner, will be on the same show so you
can call ask him if attending any Miami game next year will entitle you
to a free video rental from any Blockbuster store.

-PPV Mark
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: mstern@wam.umd.edu (Michael Stern)
Subject: Re: Thomas Steen over the hill???
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 03:42:58 GMT

In article <3899@mdavcr.mda.ca> hp@mdavcr.mda.ca (Hossein Parandeh) writes:
>In article <1992Dec14.195129.18051@wam.umd.edu> mstern@wam.umd.edu (Michael Stern) writes:
>>
>>It would appear that Steen's better days are behind him.  And considering
>>the recent infusion of youth and talent in Winnipeg (i.e. Zhamnov, Tkachuk,
>>Selanne, Davydov), a retirement party may soon be in order.
>
>You must be kidding, Steen can be a valueable player to any expansion team,
>(including Ottawa and Tampa).

I guess if sitting up in the press box with back spasms and muching on
popcorn are considered desirable attributes, Steen could be a VALUABLE
player somewhere.  Failing that, he's all but washed up.  Sorry to make it
sound so cruel, but the Jets should just cut his (hefty) salary and 
continue with the youth movement.

Michael Stern	mstern@wam.umd.edu	UMCP/USDA-ARS

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: expansion
Summary: Huh?
Organization: Rice University
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 21:39:27 GMT

In article <1992Dec13.202813.1020@sobeco.com> rcroteau@sobeco.com (r.croteau) writes:
>In <1992Dec12.203259.18643@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:
>
>>The Gunds, who now own the Sharks, were once the owners of the 
>>Seals/Barons/merged Northstars franchise...but, my vague memory on
>>which I could most certainly be wrong, was that Charlie Finlay was
>>the original owner of the Seals.
>
>>The Other Gerald
>
>I also think that Finley might have had a stake in the Seals, who else could
>have had the idea of having the players wear white skates ?

Charlie O *did* own the Seals for a while, but he was not the original
owner.  He came along in 1970 or '71, after the team had already moved out
of the Cow Palace, moved across the bay into Oakland, and had already been
taken over by the league once because the owners of the time couldn't afford
the losses they were piling up from the minuscule gate they were drawing.
Charlie came in, changed the team colors to green and gold, and yes, the
white skates were his idea.  (He wasn't the only one -- the New York Golden
Blades in the WHA tried that in the 1973-74 season, until they were thrown
out of the Garden and had to finish the season as the Jersey Knights...)

--PLH, always wanted a pair of blue ones, myself



--
From: vuorinen@sara.cc.utu.fi
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: The first number of Gordie Howe
Date: 17 Dec 92 12:53:50 GMT
Organization: University of Turku, Finland

I would like to know what was the first number of Gordie Howe in NHL. 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: rallen@netcom.com (Robert W. Allen)
Subject: Re: The Miami ???? vs the Anaheim ?????
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 07:08:34 GMT

Before the Kings existed, LA had a minor league team called the LA Blades.
I initially liked the name 'Anaheim Blades' for the new team, but someone
in the newspaper suggested a variation that I like even better: 'Bladerunners'.
--
Rob Allen
rallen@netcom.com
From: patchman@wpi.WPI.EDU (Peter Bruce Harper)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: More on Boston (Re: Boston, Montreal, Adams...)
Date: 11 Dec 1992 18:36:56 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu



One thing I forgot to mention about Boston is that most people are banking on
Neely to come back and be in his old form.  Let's be honest though, will he 
even some back?  And if he does, what are the chances that he'll be as good as
he was.  He's been laid off for a mighty long time to come back and score like
he used to.  And will he be able to play as physical as he used to?  Or will 
he be like Andy Brickley was - constantly in and out of the lineup with 
new injuries or reinjury of the old one?  I wouldn't pin all of my hopes on
his return.  And it's really too bad because Neely was a GREAT player.

-Pete 

P.S. Don't forget about the awesome (NOT) Fred and Derek!  Totally unbiased
anouncing at it's finest! :-)


*************************************************************************
*  "I am the Lizard King,          *   Peter Harper                     *
*   I can do anything!             *   Worcester Polytechnic Institute  *
*        - James Douglas Morrison  *   Worcester, MA 01609              *
*                 Poet             *      patchman@wpi.wpi.edu          *
*              (1943-1971)         *      patchman@hongkong.wpi.edu     * 
*************************************************************************
Organization: H&SS Dean's Office, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 09:06:09 -0500 
From: Anna Matyas <am2x+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: New Mike Lange-isms
	<1992Dec17.141130.2836@philabs.philips.com>


John Curcio writes:

>In article <4f=sEEq00WBNI3HX0U@andrew.cmu.edu> am2x+@andrew.cmu.edu
(Anna Matya
>s) writes:
> 
>>I know a lot of you are Mike Lange fans so I thought I'd let you know
>>about some of his new stuff.
> 
>Some of us think he's an idiot, but that's beside the point...

Some of us think you're an idiot too, John.  (Just trying to spread a
little Christmas cheer...)

Mom.
From: v057p7nk@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Andrew W Korbut)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Lindros injury/Flyers Lie
Date: 15 Dec 92 03:45:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Dec14.170025.11143@tigger.jvnc.net>, haught@tigger.jvnc.net (Darrell Haught) writes...
>I consider myself a Flyers fan but am pretty pissed off @the management
>on the Lindros injury. When Eric first got injured that said he would
>only be out for a week-10 days. That was on Nov. 22 and he still is not
>playing. Does anybody else think that they knew he would be out longer
>but considering Eric is the Flyers main attraction they would just say
>hey he will be in next game. Any and all Opinions I would like to here
>on this matter. 
> 
>Darrell
>haught@tigger.jvnc.net 

Well, considering I have him in the pool, it pisses me off... I gotta drop this
rummy soon.  WHERE ARE THE NEW PRICES!?!?!? ARGH!

 Dr.D [The Devils Advocate]        "Drinkin' & women & guns don't mix..."
 v057p7nk@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu
 awkorbut@acsu.buffalo.edu                      - Mark Arm
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: wizz@bnr.ca (Boris Volk)
Subject: Re: trade rumor
Reply-To: wizz@bnr.ca (Boris Volk)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 18:18:01 GMT

In article <Af=nZ4u00Uh701iHAO@andrew.cmu.edu>, Anna Matyas <am2x+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
|> 
|> Food for thought.  Folks were talking about this rumor last night:
|> 
|> Jaromir Jagr and unnamed player(s) for Brett Hull.
|> 
|> Hmmm...Hull isn't happy in St Louis.  Jagr has said he'll go anywhere
|> for the money (but he also wants sunshine and pretty girls).  Would
|> Hull be happy on the second (or third?!) line?
|> 
|> Mom.
|> 

 It's absolutly amazing that anybody could judge Jagr to be of comparable value
to Brett Hull. I realize that most Penguin fans have trouble with this, but
then again they have a fairly myopic view of hockey in general.

 Jagr unquestionably has talent and enormous potential. But, with the exception
of last year's playoff, where is the beef? He reminds me of a young Ruzicka
with better teeth - shows something once every 5 or six games. How could any
sane GM trade a proven 70-80 goal scorer for a potential 80-90 pt player. Yes I
believe that Jagr will never break the century mark in points for the simple
reason that he doesn't have the internal drive to do it. 

 As for Hull being on the third line, that equally laughable. The Pens do have
2 franchise players in Lemieux and Stevens, however after that what do they have.

   Francis - solid 2nd line center - his best days were in Hartford
   Tochett - almost a franchise player
   Mullen - nobody wanted this free agent - 20 goal man on another team
   McEachern (sp) - good prospect - who knows
   Errey - get real
   
 Should this insane trade come about the lines would probably be
   
  Errey Lemieux Hull

  Stevens Francis Tochett

 Lemieux and Stevens are unquestionably the engine that powers the Pens. It was
evident that they were much weaker when Stevens was out of the line-up. The old
Oilers made quite a few journeyman players look like stars when they mixed them
in with Gretzky and Messier.

 Having said all this, the Pens still do have the best talent in the league, but
I beleive that the gap that separted them from the rest of the pack is
dimminishing with the influx of talent from Europe.

 Boris Volk 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Droopy)
Subject: Re: Anaheim and Miami. WHY?!!
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 14:13:55 GMT

green@ie.utoronto.ca (Marc Green) writes:

>kellerjb@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jeffrey Keller) writes:

>>In article <farenebt.724080071@craft.camp.clarkson.edu> farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Droopy) writes:
>>>The subject line says it all. You've got places like Milwaukee,
>>>Hamilton, Seattle, etc and they choose Southern California and 
>>>Southern Florida! Despite the change in leadership, apparently
>>>the same dolts are calling the shots. Also, this is so inane to
>>>believe but i heard the Anaheim team would be called the "Mighty
>>>Ducks". I thought this new leadership was supposed to bring the
>>>game MORE credibility...
>>>

>>I agree.  This is terrible.  I thought the point of the NHL expansion was to
>>expand the game to more places.  Instead, they put one team in a city that
>>already has a team and the other team in a state they just expanded to.  These
>>choices don't make much sense to me.  Anaheim gets a team because Disney made
>>a movie about hockey?!  What kind of qualifications are those?  Are they trying
>>to create an NHL version of the Clippers?  Seattle, Milwaukee, and Hamilton
>>all make more sense to me than either one of these cities.

>>-- 
>> _     _  _     _
>>|_|| ||_|| \| ||_        JEFFREY B KELLER        |   Hoosier by birth,
>>|  |_|| \|_/|_||_   kellerjb@sage.cc.purdue.edu  |   BOILERMAKER by the
>>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-   grace of God!

>Then obviously you have very little sense. I know that it's hard to
>believe, but the NHL has made a masterful move. Disney has it's own
>cable channel that goes into virtually every cable connected household
>in America. This means everybody is going to get hockey on TV. Then
>there are the promotional opportunities through their Disney stores and
>theme parks. Similar, though less dramatic, promotional opportunities
>exist through Blockbuster video. 

>And I don't understand the crack about the Clippers. The Kings have sold
>out every game for a couple of years. Why shouldn't Anaheim be a success?

Because the "Mighty Ducks" (I cant stand that name) will not have Wayne
Gretzky. Period.

>Judging from the posts, some people seem to think that the NHL is a charity,
>rather a business. Like any business marketing is the key to success. At
>last, the NHL has figured that out.

If that's the case, then why is one of the temas about to be named
after a child's movie? The NHL already has a credibility problem.
========================================================================
BRI FARENELL	    CLARKSON '95	FARENEBT@CRAFT.CAMP.CLARKSON.EDU
ECAC and AHL contact for rec.sport.hockey		 Boston Bruins rule!
join the AHL mailing list: ahl-news-request@andrew.cmu.edu    Go USA hockey!
ADIRONDACK RED WINGS, Calder Cup Champs: '81  '86  '89  '92  
========================================================================
From: kdc@ccu.umanitoba.ca ()
Subject: Re: Housley Trade rumours - the deal is off
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 14:30:46 GMT


 Winnipeg GM Mike Smith squelched the trade rumours on Monday.
After a phone call with Bryan Murray, Smith was quoted (in the Wpg Sun):
 "I'd say its pretty improbable we'll be trading Phil Housley."
 
 Murray was quoted: "We tried. We talked. Now we've got to get back to
   our teams and let them play."
 
 All the trade rumours havent seemed to have affect Housley.  In last
night's game against NJ he (to quote the Sun again)
 "scored the go ahead goal, assisted on the game-winner and 
  generally played as if he was the most contented player on
  the planet"
 
 
 The victory was a milestone of sorts for the JETS, the 400th franchise
 victory....
 
 Selanne had another good game, Gees! he has wheels !
 
 
  Ken D.
From: owentracyjea@bvc.edu (Tracy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Skills Stats?
Date: 20 Dec 92 17:18:18 CST
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA

  Does anyone have the Skills comp. stats?  I was at the Sharks' comp. but 
the only other scores they had at the time were from Minnesota.  The Sharks 
faired OK against the Stars except for Modano (YEA!!) and I was wondering 
if we would see any TEAL at the All-Star game?

Thanks and have a Merry Christmas and a HOCKEY New Year!!!

-- 
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
Tracy "USHL" Owen                              "Earn more sessions by sleaving"
e-mail "SMACK@cs.Stanford.edu"                            -Roxanne
________________________________________________________________________________
                          
                          DENVER UNIVERSITY HOCKEY 
          "...Schmidtke, to Cary, over to Ricci, back to Cary.......
                          HE SHOOTS AND HE SCORES!"
                       
                               _______________
                              / |   | | |   | \
                              | | O |.|.| O | |
                              |[|   | | |   |]|
                              | | O |.|.| O | |
                              \_|___|_|_|___|_/

{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson)
Subject: Is a PS a PP?
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 01:22:45 GMT

During the NJ/TB game, the announcers said that Andersson's penalty shot
goal against LA was a power play goal. There was no other penalty, so is
a PS goal a PP goal? What if the team is shorthanded? Someone asked this
already, but no one posted an answer.

Tom
From: chuq@Apple.COM (Eeyore's Evil Twin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Money doesn't talk, it swears.
Date: 14 Dec 92 00:49:25 GMT
Organization: Pooh Corner Country Club -- A Planned Community

kenttj@cnsvax.uwec.edu writes:

>	Once again, the NHL has passed over Milwaukee as an expansion
>team.

you probably want to get your facts right. Milwaukie refused to compete for
an expansion team, preferring to go after one of the teams they expect to be
moving during the off season (hartford or Tampa). 

but, of course, a little fact like that screws up the rest of your rhetoric,
so don't le me stop you.

-- 
            Chuq "IMHO" Von Rospach, ESD Support & Training (DAL/AUX)
                      Member, SFWA =+= Editor, OtherRealms
                chuq@apple.com | GEnie: MAC.BIGOT | ALink:CHUQ 

                       Sterling Holloway: We'll miss you.
From: iacurtop@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Iacurto Paul)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Bruins lose to Canadiens.!
Date: 13 Dec 92 06:18:35 GMT
Organization: Universite de Montreal

The Bruins proved once again last night that they are only
a three man team up front (oates, kvartalnov, juneau); when
those three guys don't get going, the Bruins are in for a
long night
Even had the "big three" played a little better, the Bruins
would have had their hands full against the Habs, who I
consider have a better team:
- on offense
I prefer Bellows , Muller , Lebeau, Damphousse, Savard
over
Oates, Kvartalnov, Juneau, Leach, Ruzicka

plus the Habs supporting cast on offense is better than the Bruins:
I prefer Dionne, Keane, Carbonneau, Leclair, 
over
Poulin, Ashton, Donato, Heinze
(of course, the Bruin fans always seem to consider a superstar
in the making and they will tell me that Panteleiev is the
next big star - NOT) (he will go down as a bust just like
Ken Hodge and Wes Walz)

- on defense
I prefer Schneider, Desjardins, Odelein, Brisebois,  Haller

over

Bourque, Wesley (overrated), Don Sweeney, Weimer, Murphy

- and in goal

who can argue about this: Roy over Moog (yeah, yeah, I know
that Roy gets tired in the playoffs , but Bruin fans
would die to have him over Moog in nets. But Harry Sinden
would probably be too cheap to pay his salary, a problem the
Canadiens organization doesn't have)

In my opinion, the Habs have the second best team in the league
after the Pens. I would rank the B's sixth behind these two teams
plus the Wings, Rangers and Canucks.
(it's too bad the Wings have a lousy coach, cause with the
talent they have they are potentially the best team in the 
league (Yzerman, Federov, Carson, Ysebaert, Sheppard, Ciccarelli,
Lidstrom, Probert)
c
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: epritcha@s.psych.uiuc.edu (EVAN pritchard)
Subject: Re: Lowe to Rangers (Was: NHL NEWS FOR 12 DECEMBER 1992)
Organization: UIUC Department of Psychology
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 22:44:04 GMT

gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare) writes:

>The Village Voice is speculating that Lowe will be the next coach if
>the Rangers don't go all the way this year.

Since when does the Village Voice speculate on hockey?  

Evan  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare)
Subject: Re: Official Expansion: Anaheim and Miami - No Joke
Reply-To: gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare)
Organization: The Bates Motel
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 18:30:34 GMT

b_hart@macsch.com (Bill Hart) writes:
>mmb@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Michael Burger) writes:
>|>
>|>Possible implications:
>|>--Anaheim to the Smythe and Miami to the Norris, moving Toronto
>|> to the Adams.
>
>Since the NHL is giving Winnipeg special considerations for staying
>in the Smythe, I would add a switch of Winnipeg to the Norris to the
>above.

Actually, neither the Jets nor their fans wanted to leave the Smythe
becuase they preferred the teams there ... financial considerations
for TV dictated otherwise, since Winnipeg is in the Central zone and
plays lots of road game on Mountain and Pacific time.  Their threat
to call on the league's agreement to move back into the Norris (where
they landed during the merger ... um, errr ... the 1979 expansion)
was enough to get them paid off with a jet and a bag of money to go
away ...  owner Barry Shenkarow is a regular at my parent's restaurant
and when you ask him about the plane, he chuckles ...

I was in town during the week of that BoG meeting and Jets fans were 
cackling over that extortion on the call-in shows ...

gld
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Je me souviens ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gary L. Dare
> gld@cunixd.cc.columbia.EDU 		Support NAFTA
> gld@cunixc.BITNET			 Eat Mexican  (El Teddy's ad)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey