From: keegan@windsurf.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Consistency on the Email Privacy Issue?
Date: 6 Apr 92 13:20:51 GMT
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> keegan@sungod.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
-> >kevin@rotag (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> >-> In the light of his recent implications that email isn't
-> >-> really private, I reproduce, in passing, some selected headers
-> >-> of a relatively-recent article from Jimmy Keegan ("Subject:"
-> >-> line broken to accommodate braindead paging routines & the
-> >-> emphasis (carets) of the word "private" is added, of course):
-> >-> 
-> >-> Subject: kellmeyer posts private email! (Re: To T.S.A.K.C. (or whatever the\
-> >->          hell it is))    ^^^^^^^
-> >-> Message-ID: <28049@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
-> >-> Date: 4 Mar 92 02:20:42 GMT
-> >
-> >the full content of the message kevin refers to is available
-> >to anyone who would like to see it and who requests it via
-> >email.  nowhere in that message is there any criticism of
-> >kellmeyer for posting.
-> 
-> But you did modify the noun "email" with the adjective
->"private", did you not?
-> 
-> Why is your email "private", but Welch's isn't?

who said that mine was (other than you)? you have heard of
mailing lists haven't you?

-> >now that you mention it, you do remember defending
-> >kellmeyer's posting of that email, don't you? and here you've
-> >been hypocritically flaming susan garvin for posting
-> >threatening and obscene email which, imo, should have been
-> >posted.
-> >
-> >in case you forgot your hypocritical defense of kellmeyer's
-> >post, it's appended to this article in its entirety. you
-> >really owe susan garvin and the entire newsgroup an apology
-> >for your pompous hypocrisy, as well as for your
-> >out-and-out-lies.
-> >
-> >==========================begin included post
-> >
-> >From kevin@cfctech (Kevin Darcy) Thu Mar  5 08:16:38 1992
-> >From: kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy)
-> >Newsgroups: talk.abortion
-> >Subject: Re: kellmeyer posts private email! (Re: To T.S.A.K.C. (or whatever the hell it is))
-> >Message-ID: <1992Mar5.023356.23991@cfctech.cfc.com>
-> >Date: 5 Mar 92 02:33:56 GMT
-> >References: <1992Mar3.230341.19911@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <28049@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
-> >Organization: Chrysler Financial Corp., Southfield, MI
-> >
-> >In article <28049@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> keegan@ukulele.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
-> >>cornered, and unable to support one of his false allegations,
-> >>steven kellmeyer posts an annotated copy of an email message i
-> >>sent to him in response to an email message from him.
-> >>
-> >> [same old, same old]
-> >
-> >Jimmy, don't you ever tire of playing such a repetitive, officious, nit-picking 
-> >little weasel?
-> >
-> >I mean, if we all spent great gobs of time trying to prove/support/
-> >substantiate/corroborate/regurgitate every event since the Big Bang to 
-> >*YOUR* (seemingly insatiable) satisfaction, that wouldn't leave much 
-> >opportunity to actually discuss -issues-, now would it?
-> >
-> >=======end included post=========
-> 
-> Please point out the part where I supposedly defended
-> Kellmeyer's confidence-breach (?). 

read your post.

-> You've completely lost it this time, Jimmy.

as almost always in our discussions, one of us has. anyone who
reads this newsgroup knows which one that is too.

heh.

--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.