HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mcmahan@cs.unca.edu (Scott McMahan -- Genesis mailing list owner)
Subject: Re: Favorite Artists?
Organization: University of North Carolina at Asheville
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 19:51:08 GMT

Well, I'll hold forth on a few:

Marc Silvestri -- #1 in my book. Too bad *he* doesn't get
another Cyber Force book out. I loved him on the X-Men,
kinda liked him on Wolverine, and love CF.

Tom Palmer -- this guy is the #1 inker/finisher of all time
He makes *anyone* look good, even some of the *lame-o* fillins
on the Avengers. And he's consistent, loving the Avengers,
not the guy who hops around from book-to-book-to-book. I like
the dedication. Him inking Buscems is a dream come true -- I 
*love* those Avengers issues.

Wendy Pini -- a timeless, classic, #1 artist.

The not-prolific Steve Lightle -- he's the #1 LEGION of SUPERHEROES
artist, and a great pencil pusher. Don't waste money on the 
drivel they're passing off as Legion now, get some of *his*
issues. He's mostly doing covers now. I wish he'd do an Image book,
cos being slow is a Good Thing at Image! If it came out
ANNUALLY I'd buy it!

I used to like John Romita JR, but his recent stuff -- take
Cable -- is not that great.

Mike Grell was *good* on GA and Legion -- he's a good *writer* too,
GA is the only DC book I pay any attention to. I wish he'd
write & draw, even if it went bi-monthly.

I'd mention the wonderful painter/artist/creator who
did all those New Mutants issues, but I'd have to go home & look
up his name :^)

People I wish would get a life and do real comics and
quit doing the DC titles: Jackson "New Mutants" Guice,
Jerry Ordway -- I loved his Infinity Inc. and can't wait for
WildStar! Just kidding about DC, but I *do* think they need
to put SuperBore and Teen Re-Hash out of their misery.

Scott
From: jrd@frame.com (James Drew)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: MISC: Desert Peach Musical (was Desert Peach)
Date: 15 Dec 1992 20:28:54 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Elisabeth Riba (lis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu) writes:

>Also, did anyone manage to see the stage play?  If so, I'd love to
>see a synopsis.  DP18 reprints the program and song list, but says
>nothing of the plot.

The plot pretty much mixes issue 1 of the comic (the whole teapot scene) with
the real-world assassination attempt on Hitler, liberally adds music, and
produces a Sondheim-esque operetta.  I really enjoyed it.  (Hey, I knew I
would; I flew up to Seattle just to see it, and treated my parents to the
show, too.)

I saw it near the end of the run, when many of the problems had been worked
out; I get the feeling that Roger Tang may have seen it near the start.

I've written a review of it to send into Comics Buyer's Guide.  Since it's
after the fact, I've added in some of the lyrics (I bought the songbook, and
ordered the 2-CD soundtrack), and am waiting for Donna's approval to use the
quotes.  The review will also appear in Ciao! #7, and I can proably be
coaxed into posting it here, too.

As for other reviews of the musical: the Seattle Times hated it, the Seattle
P.I. loved it, and the local Seattle gay newspaper was scared to death and
left at the intermission, saying that the comic character is wonderfully done,
but the character in the play is just a stereotype (hmm... since a good
portion of the play was directly lifted from the comic...).  As Donna says,
"Yes, the Peach *is* a stereotype, but I know so many gay men *just* like him."

As Donna also says, "Anyone who takes this seriously, deserves to."

(P.S. Thanks, Elisabeth, for the plug in CBG.  I've now had my name in CBG
four weeks in a row!)

------------------------------
                             |      Ron's eye was caught by a booth featuring a
Jim Drew                     | clothing catalog claiming to feature "The Look.
jrd@frame.com                | The Lifestyle."
(Furry: Randy Puritan)       |     Ron picked it up, and put it down just as
"Innocent, but not naive."   | fast.  "Not *my* look," he said.
B(2)h t c k s g+(p) rv p e   |     I had to agree.  "If that's the *look*, I'll
S8/5 g l+ y+ o+ a+ u++- j++  | just take the feel."
{opinions: mine != frame's}  |     Ron looked at me with arched eyebrows.
                             |     "I really have to watch what I say around
                             | you people, don't I?" I said, blushing.
                             |		- Marc Lynx, "Awl's Fare"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: tpjg9663@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Tom Johnston)
Subject: Re: Flash 73: SPOILERS!!!
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 17:30:33 GMT

jcowling@ophelia.UVic.CA (Scowling Jim Cowling) writes:

>I'm surprised that nobody's mentioned this yet.

>In the issue of The Flash which hit the shelves today (#73), we have the 
>apparent return of the one, the only...
>

>Barry Allen!

>Well, kids, whaddaya think? It's quite possible this is Barry.

>Consider:

>Barry's got time travel powers.  He could conceivably show up here, now, or
>anywhen, without problem.  

>Comments?

Umm, haven't seen the issue yet.  Is there any chance this is a trick
by Abra-Kadabra?  I'm not sure what his goal would be, but he's done
some pretty wacky stuff over the years, right?  (Changing Barry Allen
into a puppet Flash, etc.)

Tom
From: c60c-3gg@web-1a.berkeley.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Superman, Superman, Everybody's talking about Superman ...
Date: 15 Dec 92 05:03:00 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley


A quick question about Superman 75, since I don't usually read DC much
less keeping the current market info about it.

Is it just the bagged collector's issue that's going rediculousely high
in price or is someone out there trying to sell the newsstand issue
above the cover price too?

All these talks are unspecific and tend to get me confused (being in
college does that to people).  After all, there are still a HORD of
newstand issues at my comic store selling at cover price.

							J.T.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: vnend@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (D. W. James)
Subject: Re: Sandman - Old Gods
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 22:15:57 GMT

In article <1992Dec13.090741.10735@vax.oxford.ac.uk> cen@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
) lsmith@atto.cs.umn.edu (Lance "Squiddie" Smith) writes:
 
)Oh, Lance, Neil says: Look up Capax in a big dictionary. And you were right
)about Tamaris, but it was meant to be Taramis (the printing was screwed:
)Del's eyes are supposed to be different colours in this issue, and all her
)uncoloured word balloons are wrong). 

	From the OED2:

ca'pax, a. Obs. Also 6 capack(e)s. [a.  OFr. capax, a. L. cap x, f.
cap re to take: cf. CAPACE, CAPACIOUS.] Of capacity; able and ready to
take or receive; capable.
  1432-50 tr. Higden (Rolls) VI. 361 They scholde sende theire ser-
vauntes to the study, if thei were capax of conynge [TREVISA able to
lerne]. 1483 CAXTON Gold. Leg. 271/2 Goo fight and be capax of perylles.
1491 CAXTON Vitas Patr. (W. de W.) II.  282 a, Was capax and redy to
receyue the euerlastyng blysse. C. 1530 REDFORDE Play Wit & Sc. (1848) 2
Yoong, paynefull, tractable and capax. 1556 J. HEYWOOD Spider & F. xv.
49 Sure I can no false knacks, Alas, master spyder, ye be to capacks.


-- 
Vnend, Lottery winner #316                 Ignorance is the mother of adventure.  
vnend@princeton.edu, vnend@pucc.bitnet, or {backbone}!princeton!nudity!vnend        
        Anonymous posting service (NO FLAMES!):vnend@ms.uky.edu                          
   "Most books now say our sun is a star.  But it still knows how to change         back into a sun in the daytime."
From: mre@kepler.unh.edu (Santa MikE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Superman's fate according to Entertainment Tonight!
Date: 16 Dec 1992 19:06:25 GMT
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
NNTP-Posting-Host: kepler.unh.edu

In article <kf=odga00WBMQ1uS1N@andrew.cmu.edu> Anatole Wilson <aw3a+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>According to the report, there will be four--count'em, four--Superman
>clones running around Metropolis. (One for each title.) One of them will
>marry Lois Lane. 

I like it--and I never really read the S-titles.  (I did get Supes #75 just to
see what it was like, tho, but I havn't read it yet.)

I just hope they don't LOOK the same!   

Of course, you just know that they're going to fight for 8 issues over who
gets Lois...and then she'll dump 'em all and marry Booster Gold.  >;-)

	--MikE...there's only one of me.


-- 
Mike Escutia	   |	"Holy Bat Caves, Boy Wonder!" 
a.k.a. Pliable Lad |				--Speedball, 
of the LNH	   |MikE@unh.edu |||  		  _New Warriors_ #31
From: burns@thurifer.harvard.edu (John A. Burns)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Superman's death--reasons
Date: 15 Dec 92 20:05:40 GMT
Organization: Chemistry Department, Harvard University


   I had been thinking of Superman's death as an extremely
cynical marketing ploy by DC.  But then I got to thinking,
maybe they plan to use this event like Marvel used the death
of Jean Grey to revive the X-Men, which led to the current
X-books mania.  Perhaps DC is just suffering from Phoenix envy.

-- 
John A. Burns (burns@thurifer.harvard.edu)
        "Don't get mad at an elf."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Lady Johanna Constantine)
Subject: Re: Favorite Artists?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 05:01:49 GMT

I like Dick Giordano's inks.  Can't believe I left inkers out of my
post.  Silly me.  Oh, and Tim Bradstreet's stuff is awesome.  He's
my Hellblazer dream artist.
-- 
Lady Johanna Constantine | "When you remove the pin, Mr Hand
tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu    |  Grenade is no longer your friend"
Founder of the Church of Our Lady of the Perpetually Clueless
Disclaimer: The U of I doesn't give a damn or blast WHAT I do
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVEN-CLAUS)
Subject: Stan Lee Doesn't own Marvel (was Re: McFarlane's art)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 09:04:04 GMT

In article <1genbvINN8j1@agate.berkeley.edu> c60b-3fe@e260-3f.berkeley.edu (???) writes:
>In article <92347.133822AERE7114@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> <AERE7114@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> writes:
>>
>>I now want to jump to McFarlane's Letters column.  I hate it!  All
>>saying that in fact Stan Lee is ripping them off? This isn't my opinion,
>>it's my confusion. I don't understand what he's talking about.
>>Somebody please explain.
>
>   Actually, I don't think that Stan Lee owns Marvel anymore.  I thought
>they just used his name in the comics as a tribute.  Don't really know for
>sure though.
>
No Stan Lee does not own Marvel.  According to Jim Shooter (a really nice guy!)
Lee is pretty much a figure head for Marvel Entertainment Corp.  "He's
there to open the doors...No one [big Hollywood types] will refuse a call
from Stan...He's one of the world's great shmooze men..."  He says that
Lee is at the point in his life (He'll be 70 this year) that he can basicly
sit back and rest on his laurels.  Shooter said that he deserves it...

>  I'm not sure what to think about the inclusion of this speech in Spawn.
>I can't decide whether it was to get people to realize the extent of Kirby's
>role in comics or just to throw another bash Marvel's way.  Seems like the
>major point is these articles is mo' money.  Is Kirby on the verge of
>living on skid row?  Is he still doing comics?  In 20-30 years, are new
>artists going to be demanding monetary compensation to Frank Miller for
>his contributions to the business?  Just wondering.
>
I'd say this is just another attack at marvel.  McFarlane is full of 'em.
(Act. that's not all he's full of...).  I don't know the full story behind
Kirby vs. Marvel, how it happpened, who it's been (or if it even has) been
resolved...maybe someone out there? Tyg? Elmo?

Kirby has FYI signed a BIG deal with Topps.  They'll be doing a number of
books from ideas that Kirby created, some of them from years ago.  I think
I remember that Kirby will be doing some work himself too, but don't quote me.
Oh, and Kirby will be/is 75.

----SCAVENGER is still psyched from meeting Jim Shooter one day, and then Ron 
Lim's cousin the next!!!

-- 
Alt.comics.lnh -the most fun you can have with  |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
    your .net on!                               |      (Internet/Usenet)
You don't have to be crazy to be in the LNH,    |  "Oh Bite Me!  It's fun"
    But it helps!!!                             |         -Crow T. Robot (MST3K)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: lsmith@myria.cs.umn.edu (Lance "Squiddie" Smith)
Subject: Re: Sandman, Hellblazer, and Hell
Organization: Snobbish Squids of the Poor
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 01:26:10 GMT

In article <Bz8JBL.7zA@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Lady Johanna Constantine) writes:

>Personally, I think John wants to nail the Snob.  He's already got
>Hell gunning for his arse, why not even things up by getting the Other
>Side after him as well?  It seems his style.  But that's pure spec.
>I'd like to see the head angel get his arse whipped, personally....

I have seen the future (or at least Vertigo's future)...

(Spoilers)


and LJC is correct about John's target. 

"Fear and Loathing" is a three part series that starts with #64. In the
first part, Constantine starts to make his moves against Gabriel (aka
The Snob) and the racist organizations that were mentioned way back in 
the scene at Gabriel's club.

In the blurbo, there's a hint that another one of Constantine's friends
will snuff it. Three guesses?

----------------------------
  Lance "Cr2O3.2H2O" Smith | "Don't think I'll ever get used to your strange
    (lsmith@cs.umn.edu)    |  clothes or that upper class, public school accent,
 Using up all that promise |  but you're all right. Let's go to the pub. Your
   I showed in my youth.   |  treat."      _Mr Peanut meets John Constantine_
From: mre@kepler.unh.edu (Santa MikE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: McFarlane's art
Date: 16 Dec 1992 18:29:58 GMT
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: kepler.unh.edu

In article <92350.123314AERE7114@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> <AERE7114@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> writes:
>The Tick #12 should be out this week or next week.

Thanks!  It's gonna be at the top of my list! 

>Barry's stuff!Writing and pencils by Edlund, inking by Whiting.

What happened to Dave Garcia?

>There also ad for 'The Tick Triple Poster Deal'
>for less than $3.00 (Canadian?)!$8.95.(It's 3 bucks each, Total is $8.95)

This I have got to get!  Oh, wait, I don't have enough room on my walls.
Dang.  Maybe I'll get one. :)

BTW, what's Comics, Etc.?  Is it like Previews?

	--MikE...SPOON!  (Just psyching up, that's all.)

-- 
Mike Escutia	   |	"Holy Bat Caves, Boy Wonder!" 
a.k.a. Pliable Lad |				--Speedball, 
of the LNH	   |MikE@unh.edu |||  		  _New Warriors_ #31
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Sin, Gaiman defend Spawn,Image
Date: 14 Dec 92 17:16:50 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1gfudgINN1kg@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bh929@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mike Palij) writes:
>In a previous article, aw3a+@andrew.cmu.edu (Anatole Wilson) says:
>
>>Have they decided what issue of SPAWN Neil Gaiman will write?
>
>In issue #6 of Spawn the following writers were advertised 
>as writing in the following issues:
>
> #     Writer
>---  -------------
> 8   Alan Moore
> 9   Neil Gaiman****
>10   Dave Sim
>11   Frank Miller

Miller has actually agreed to do #11?  Last I heard, it was still up
in the air.

-- 
Brian Perler			bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu
"I wanna decide who lives and who dies"
	-Crow T. Robot, "Santa Claus Conquers the Martians," MST3K
From: visser@convex.com (Lance Visser)
Subject: Re: McFarlane's art
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 15:10:14 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <92347.133822AERE7114@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> <AERE7114@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> writes:

+>   And just before that page was a copy of Frank Miller's speech to honor
+>Jack Kirby at the San Diego Comic Con (Aug 13, 1992).  It seemed to say that
+> ' nobody has ripped off Jack Kirby more than Marvel Comics has.' Then
+>near the end he says, ' When you go to the Marvel Booth,....,say two words:
+>Pay up!Pay up.  Give them some piece of the pie that's made you so damned fat.

	I think that the focus on and over-statement of Kirby's contribution
are getting to the point where they are counter-productive.  The current 
people who have been ripped off are those who created characters like the
Punisher, Wolverine....and probably clairmont for the x-men.



+> Some piece of the millions that never could have existed without Lee and Kirby
+>and Ditko'.  This is the part that really confuses me.  He's talking about
+>Lee as in Stan Lee.  Why should Marvel pay Stan Lee whe he owns Marvel?

	Stan Lee never owned Marvel.  His brother-in-law, Martin Goodman did
until he sold it to Cadence.




+>If Miller's talking about Marvel ripping off Ditko and Kirby, isn't he
+>saying that in fact Stan Lee is ripping them off? This isn't my opinion,

	Stan Lee tried to have himself credited with the creation of captain
america a few years back when he played no role whatsoever in the creation
of the character.

	The problem with Stan Lee is that he has both allowed and encoraged
the company to build him into the ultimate creator of everything marvel has
ever done.  When he plays the role, the others responsible for the creation
of marvel become "invisible".
	What Miller wants is for Lee to come out "for" giving money to kirby
and Ditko.  What miller and most other people dont want to realize is that
Stan Lee is nothing at Marvel and has been nothing for about the last 15 
years.  He is just a figurehead who draws a check and probably is working
on the west coast.




Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: rickard@anasazi.com (Ronald J. Rickard Jr)
Subject: Re: Superman, Superman, Everybody's talking about Superman ...
Organization: Anasazi, Inc.  Phoenix, Arizona USA
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 09:41:04 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.145027.1432@imagen.com> xyzzy@imagen.com (David McIntyre) writes:
>In article <Bz4svr.DKM@ais.org> saab@ais.org (Micheal Marks) writes:
>
>>Also, I tend to agree that the price of Supes can't sustain the level its
>>at right now.  However, this is also a unique event, and may have a unique
>>result.  I wouldn't rub it in to the "speculators" just yet.  As an 
>>example, what if, say, the big "Return of Superman" event next spring/summer
>>just fuels the fire?  It would be ironic to hear people kicking themselves
>>because they could've gotten Supes 75 "at only 20 bucks last year."  Ironic
>>indeed.
>
>I, personally, think that the fire will not be fueled by the return of 
>Superman, but rather quelled.  People will probably say "So he's not really 
>dead.  That  means that this so-called "death" book is really lying, so 
>now it ain't worth   s**t.

Except that everyone who is buying/ has bought the book knows that he will
be back ... 

Personally, I think the book will always fetch a premium price for the 
reason of all the publicity surrounding it.  Of course demand will taper
off, and the price will come down slightly, but I wouldn't wait for it
to drop back down to cover price.  I would say $10-$20 will be where
it settles.  Maybe higher.

						Ron
From: silver@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Nina Karp)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Desert Peach, Mu and other funness..
Date: 15 Dec 1992 03:21:52 GMT
Organization: /etc/organization
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu

Anyone catch the Mu Christmas compilation?  Cute li'l heart-warmin' Desert
Peach story...

Mu's got a new title out as of Friday, which I will shamelessly plug 'cause
it's done by a friend of mine... _Critturs, Hairballs from Hell_.  It's
very sick and twisted, sort of Milk & Cheese-ish.  New brain food for all
you warped minds out there...

Mostly,
Nina.
From: troyt@soda.berkeley.edu (Troy Terry)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Better Death of Supe
Date: 17 Dec 1992 10:10:25 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu
Summary: Lex Luthor, Supe dead


I don't know about all you guys, but I felt somewhat cheated by the death
of Superman.  Not only that he died (I mean, you can't kill off Lassie,
or Uncle Sam, or Gomer Pyle, why Supes?), but the way he went was just
too demeaning.  I mean, Supes does _not_ get wasted in a fistfight with
some new, made-for-the-purpose villain.  If Superman is going to fall,
it _has_ to be at the hands of some old, cherished enemy, like Lex Luthor.
And besides, it has to be at least a _little_ clever.  I mean, Supe doesn't
go around getting creamed in slugfests; he's the man of steel, after all.

Here are some ideas (Note:  Don't give me any crap about Lex having reformed,
everyone knows it's just a ruse.  He's that smart).  Feel free to suggest
more or expand on these.

1.  Lex Luthor comes up to Supe, and says "Let's be pals, bury the hatchet",
	and hands him a mint julep.  Supe quaffs the minty mixture, gets a
	funny look on his face, and keels over, realizing too late that the
	treacherous Lex had doped it with Kryptonite. [It's in one of those
	lead-coated frappe cannisters, so Supes won't notice till too late,
	y'see ... 8^D]

2.  Ol' Mixtyplik (I can't remember his real name, you all know who I mean)
	tricks the Man of Steel into saying Namrepus, which banishes him
	into Mixty's dimension.  This one even leaves open a loophole for
	his eventual return!

3.  Lex hypnotizes Lois Lane, the Woman of Kleenex, into being his servant.
	Convinces her to put a hefty chunk of kryptonite under her brassiere.
	(Modest dame that she is, and knowing about Supe's X-ray vision, she
	undoubtedly wears lead-lined undies.  Plus she's a bit of a tease).
	So Lois comes on all strong to the Supester, he can't take it any
	more and (using his super brain) figures out how to unhook her bra.
	The kryptonite -- among other things -- pops out, and Superman dies
	of k-poisoning/shock/delight.  This 'un may not pass the Comics Code.

Any others?

Regards,

	T. Terry

P.S.  Shoulda c-posted to alt.death-of-superman, oh well...
From: matthey1@husc10.harvard.edu (Bryan Matthey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Rai #0
Date: 18 Dec 92 00:18:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: husc10.MATTHEY1.92Dec17161826
Distribution: na
Organization: Harvard Arts and Sciences Computer Services, Cambridge, MA
In-reply-to: cliffr@pyuxf.uucp's message of Thu, 17 Dec 92 16:41:09 GMT

yah, maybe we could if we all had it.  But Rai#0 was sucked up so quickly,
Some of us Don't.  (Plus some scum sucking @#$#%!@%%$#@! took it from my
summer stocks so....)
--
==================================================================
============================Bryan Matthey=========================
=======================matthey1@husc.harvard.edu==================
==================================================================
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: cornwall@ravel.udel.edu (Ray J Cornwall)
Subject: Re: Favorite Artists?
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 16:21:25 GMT

>>Who are the favorite comic book artists of the people out on the net and why?
Dave Sim and Gerhard. 
Dale Keown's stuff on Hulk.
SAL BUSCEMA!!! SAL BUSCEMA!!! (One of the most underrated artists
around...didn't anybody see "Death of Vermin"?)
Alan Davis
Todd McFarlane's Spawn (not Spidey- that stuff was ecchh...)
And whoever did Gregory...
Ray Cornwall
U of D