HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cj@eno.esd.sgi.com (C.J. Silverio)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Consensus stuff - the real reasoning
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:41:07 GMT
Reply-To: cj@sgi.com
Organization: SGI TechPubs


In article <1992Nov10.125316.9659@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU writes:
|}In article <s5gbeus@zola.esd.sgi.com|cj@sgi.com writes:
|}>Too bad I won't get to see their ceaseless harassment of
|}>poor McBean.

|I doubt anyone else will "get" to see it either. 

You mean they're-- gasp!-- hypocrites?  Oh my!  How, uh,
surprising!  NOT.  Having had my opinion of them confirmed
by you, I will leave it at that.

|I wouldn't characterize it as "too bad" however.  I find little
|of value in "ceaseless harassment" or in those who fantasize
|about it.

I agree-- which is why I condemn Keegan, Darcy, and now
Holtsinger as worthless blatherers.  Booooring.

---
cj@eno.esd.sgi.com      C J Silverio/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720
"Emma felt [...] that to be the favourite and intimate of a man who had
so many intimates and confidantes, was not the very first distinction
in the scale of vanity."  --Jane Austen
From: krobinso@peach.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A Troll Farewell, a troll hello . . .
Date: 11 Nov 92 19:15:50 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1992Nov10.143206.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>In article <Bx0464.6q9@cmptrc.lonestar.org>, andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>> 
>> And so... with a grand flourish of his ego... I mean, hat... the diminutive,
>> ugly troll rode away into the sunset with the words:
>> 
>>        "Never fear!  I will return some day when you have all
>> 	forgotten me!  That way you won't notice that I'm 
>> 	posting the same puerile insults over and over!"
> 
>> -- Andy
>
>At least I have some ego to flourish and some accomplishments (ha ha) here,
>what the fuck have you ever contributed, Mr. Personality?  Your trite,
>snappy one-liners make you a minor player at best.  I class you in the ranks
>with the rest of the unknowns, punk.  But of course, now that I've  made the
>mistake of recognizing you, they'll say you're some kind of contender like that
>miserable bitch Lara (I know she'll hear that I mentioned her and be back, she
>just can't resist the troll).  I can state pretty contently that I am the best
>flamer here, and always will be whether I'm here or not.  Why do I even waste
>my time with you people?  I have a 14 year old, semi-illiterate cousin who can
>think of better comebacks who I can go toe to toe with in real life, yet I
>torture myself with typing just to entertain this rabble . . . .    
>Every time I come here the results are always the same, a few cretins rise to
>the occasion and I roll right over them just like those tanks rolled over the
>student protestors in Tiennamen Square.  
>
>      Maybe, I should consult K E N, maybe he can recommend a good cousellor.

K e n suggest that you both seek counseling.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC)
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Followup-To: alt.flame,misc.test,alt.job.gooley
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 20:49:01 GMT

In article <63.2AF95C84@business.fidonet.org> Leonard.Kinerson@p0.f110.n363.z1.fidonet.org (Leonard Kinerson) writes:
>Are There any people out there that voted For Clinton
>If So WHY!!!!!!!!!
>I would realy like to know 
>Thanks
>
>
>... EI3 Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies -has air superiority!!
>--  
>        Leonard Kinerson  -  via FidoNet Node: 1:363/42
>             UUCP:  -  ...tarpit!tous!business!110.0!Leonard.Kinerson
>             ARPA:  -  Leonard.Kinerson@p0.f110.n363.z1.fidonet.org

That is a good question Leonard.  I think a better question would be: Why
are you such a fuckhead wanker who posts with his head up his ass?  Perhaps
you could answer this first.


Ta-ta for now,
M
Organization: William Rainey Harper College; Palatine, IL  60067
Date: Thursday, 12 Nov 1992 12:45:15 CST
From: <BWUNSCHE@HARPERVM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: you will pay for tv


TV.  Will take your money for watching what once was free. No more!!!
     free broad cast . They will turn down the power of the broad cast
     forcing you to go cable . Thats what will happen . No more free
     baseball , no more free football , and so on . Thats why Bush lost
     the veto to regulate cable tv .
     Its back to radio again .

Bill Wunschel                                 bwunsche@HARPERVM.BITNET
computer operator                        William Rainey Harper College
Information Systems                      1200 W Algonquin Rd Palatine IL
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: Leonard.Kinerson@p0.f110.n363.z1.fidonet.org (Leonard Kinerson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Why Clinton
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 92 23:16:00 PDT
Organization: FidoNet node 1:363/110.0 - The Bear's Den BBS, Orlando FL

Are There any people out there that voted For Clinton
If So WHY!!!!!!!!!
I would realy like to know 
Thanks


... EI3 Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies -has air superiority!!
--  
        Leonard Kinerson  -  via FidoNet Node: 1:363/42
             UUCP:  -  ...tarpit!tous!business!110.0!Leonard.Kinerson
             ARPA:  -  Leonard.Kinerson@p0.f110.n363.z1.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 07:49:12 GMT

In article <kmr4.168.721514841@po.CWRU.edu>, kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M Ryan) writes:
> 	When the President shows evidence of his lack of knowledge about the 
> Constitution, it is disgraceful for all Americans. Native born humans, who 
> happen to be athiest, and who have not been convicted of certain crimes, are 
> considered to be citizens of the United States. Their individual religious 
> views, or their lack of religious views has no effect upon their citizenship.

Oh I see. You're the type that thinks because they read parts of the
Consitiution, they understand it all. Well Mr. Dickless, sorry Mr. Dick (M)
Less, if you had the slightest clue about the workings of government, you would
know that the president does not interpret the Constitution, nor does he need
to understand it. Thats what the Supreme Court is for. Gee, that's kinda
logical isn't it! The president need only DEFEND the Constitution. I guess
that's why in the oath, he says "preserve, protect, and defend the
Constitution..." Nowhere is there mention of "intrepret" or "understand". It's
strange how you accuse President Bush of not knowing the Constitution, when you
have yet to take your first freshman class in government.

--The Phantom
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.bizarre
From: boutell@isis.cshl.org (Tom Boutell)
Subject: AHRGH! I BLEW IT!
Organization: Cold Spring Harbor Labs
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 16:27:23 GMT

I know, I know, I left out a word:

"Mensa didn't tell me I'd have to go down to bring my scores up," he
mused.

-- 
Tom Boutell, boutell@cshl.org

Clausthaler is the best non - alcoholic beer in the known universe.
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: THE ULTIMATE FLAME OF FLAMES
Date: 5 Nov 92 15:06:50 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

> ooi@latcs5.lat.oz.au (Jeffrey K Ooi) writes:
>Since this is the flame newsgroup...
>
{lameness and whitespace deleted)
>
>-- 
>  Jeffrey (George bush) Ooi |   Ghostrider, you're instructed to land...    
>  La Trobe University       |   Land Immediately!  What're you doin' Mav?
>  Australia                 |   We ain't got no fuel for this...
   ^^^^^^^^^

you already flamed yourself, why should i bother?
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: K e n is K e n, And K e n Can Only Be K e n
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 22:00:59 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.162021.18726@uni.edu> mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone) writes:
>In article <BxB602.E6L@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <1dbjpcINNoub@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>>>In article <Bx5vzy.208@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>
>>>>K e n does not bore people, for K e n is K e n, and K e n can only be
>>>>K e n, thus K e n is K e n and only K e n.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Wait wait wait a minute...K e n is K e n, therefore K e n does not bore people?
>>>I'm having a problem with the logical connection between the two...
>>
>>Simple, K e n is K e n, and since K e n is K e n, then K e n is K e n,
>>and thus K e n is not boring, for K e n can only be K e n.
>>
>
>While you are correct in asserting that ken is ken, this does not
>preclude ken from also being boring.  Ken can be BOTH ken and
>boring.  Example:  4 = 4 = 3 + 1,  ken is ken is boring.  If ken
>is equivalent to boring, then ken can be only ken and still be
>boring, just as 4 can only be 4 but can be 3 + 1 as well. 

Your theory is interesting but incorrect, for K e n is not an integer,
and cannot be classified by a logical symbol. K e n can only be K e n,
and boring is not K e n, for K e n is K e n.

K e n suggests you try again. This time remove your brain from neutral
and engage it. The results might surprise you, considering that you
are unfamiliar with non-neutral mental applications.

K e n also suggests that you retire your sig, for it only proves that
you lack a life.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: University of Northern Indiana
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 16:07:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.235326.1@acad.drake.edu>, vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>You stupid brainwashed, pathetic attempt at a human being. Only a spineless
>  [more potty mouth deleted]
>
>--The Phantom 
>
Nice vinny, anonymously call someone spineless.



 ___        ___    _______   __    ___        ___   ______   ___     __
|   \      /   |  |   ____| |  |   \  \      /  /  |_    _| |   \   |  |
|    \    /    |  |  |      |  |    \  \    /  /     |  |   |    \  |  |
|     \  /     |  |  |___   |  |     \  \  /  /      |  |   |     \ |  |
|  |\  \/  /|  |  |   ___|  |  |      \  \/  /       |  |   |  |\  \|  |
|  | \    / |  |  |  |      |  |       \    /        |  |   |  | \     |
|  |  \  /  |  |  |  |____  |  |____    \  /        _|  |_  |  |  \    | 
|__|   \/   |__|  |_______| |_______|    \/        |______| |__|   \___|

 ___        ___    ______    __        __            __        ________
|   \      /   |  |_    _|  |  |      |  |          /  \      |   ____  \
|    \    /    |    |  |    |  |      |  |         /    \     |  |    |  |
|     \  /     |    |  |    |  |      |  |        /  /\  \    |  |____|  |
|  |\  \/  /|  |    |  |    |  |      |  |       /  /__\  \   |   ____  <
|  | \    / |  |    |  |    |  |      |  |      |   ____   |  |  |    |  |
|  |  \  /  |  |   _|  |_   |  |____  |  |____  |  |    |  |  |  |    |  |
|__|   \/   |__|  |______|  |_______| |_______| |__|    |__|  |__|    |__| D

 __________    __            __       ________      _______    ________
|   ____   |  |  |          /  \     |   ___  \    /  ___  \  |__    __|
|  |    |__|  |  |         /    \    |  |   |  |  |  |   |__|    |  |
|  |          |  |        /  /\  \   |  |   |  |  |  |_____      |  |
|  |   ____   |  |       /  /__\  \  |  |   |  |   \_____  \     |  |
|  |  |_   |  |  |      |   ____   | |  |   |  |   __    |  |    |  |
|  |____|  |  |  |____  |  |    |  | |  |___|  |  |  |___|  |    |  |
|__________|  |_______| |__|    |__| |________/    \_______/     |__| O N E
From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 12:31:51 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
> In article <XFFZTB6w165w@mantis.co.uk>, mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
> > At a guess, it beats voting for a mealy-mouthed fascist hypocrite who claim
> > atheists can't be US citizens, nobody but his friends should be allowed to
> > have abortions, and that there is no recession.
> 
> You stupid brainwashed, pathetic attempt at a human being. Only a spineless
> liberal worm like yourself would have the lack of intelligence to post
> something as moronic as you have. For just one moment, stop your hand from
> stroking your rather swollen penis and kindly place it far up your ass and
> shake hands with your mother. She would be proud of her cow's rectum for a so

There is more to flaming than stringing together meaningless insults and bad
language.  Flailing around in anger when someone ridicules your right-wing
political opinions isn't flaming, it's a rather pathetic and transparent
attempt at smokescreening.  You'd gain a little more respect if you just
admitted that you can't actually answer the criticisms made of your darling
soon-to-be-ex President.

Don't bother replying with further teenage insult and unfocused aggression. 
Flaming is a battle of wits, and I have no intention of engaging an unarmed
opponent.


mathew
-- 
Obscenity is the hallmark of the inarticulate motherfucker.

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC)
Subject: Re: Idiots elaborating on politics
Followup-To: alt.flame,misc.test
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 20:40:35 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.122821.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> pjz2@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>
>  To the jerk who tried to elaborate on my argument,
>
>     It is clear that you cannot truly function in society with views like that
>where are you so I can call the Dept. of human services so they can take you
>home to your padded cell. You fuckin geek if I met you I would kick your
>homosexual, knee-jerk liberal ass. I would show you who the real pussy is you
>fucking wage slave. It appears you suck ass to get that paycheck corp boy so
>fuck off and die, the best part of you rolled off the crack of your mothers ass
>and became a stain on the matress. I think you been taking to many of the
>chemicals that your place of employment (or commitment) sells. You just dont
>get it, you must have supported that peanut eating fuck Jimmy Carter who let
>the world step all over us or maybe your some draft dodging fuck. People like
>you are the reason that we are in such sad shape you talk the shit but when it
>comes time to act you run. Why don't you go to some shithole country like
>Germany or Canada (or did you run there already) I don't know why I even
>spent time answering this. I will bet you are one of those students who
>defaulted on loans. As for military service mad because you know you could not
>cut it This military person will wipe the fuckin ground with your gutless ass.
>Did mommy and daddy change your underwear yet pinko, Better yet I bet mommy and
>daddy indoctrinated you with this philosophy, Misguided illiterate fucks.
>If you can't support it with documentation than stay
>the fuck off the newsnet.
>
>
>
>                                  If you have any guts write back intelligently
>                                                                         
>
>
Really Paul, just how much lead paint did you eat as a baby?  Was it just
for snacks, or was it for meals also.



Ta-ta for now my babbling friend,
M
From: wd5j@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Rabbit-knowing
Date: 7 Nov 92 14:24:05 EST
Distribution: rec,world
Organization: Cornell University

In article <1992Nov5.192604.22619@frog.CRDS.COM>,
jcc@frog.CRDS.COM (Jim Chagnon) writes: 
> In article <1992Nov2.163113.5403@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) correctly titles his post:
> 
>>BULLSHIT.
>>BULLSHIT
>>BULLSHIT.
> 
>>It is not cowardly. The proper adjective you seek is 'polite'. I have no 
>>desire to actually hurt anyone feelings on these groups, and therefore
>>I only excoriate them in a froup which was designed for such insults. In
>>fact, the reason alt.flame was created was to prevent flamewars from
>>taking up space in other serious groups. The reason I do not cross post
>>such articles is in the interest of consideration for the readers of the
>>other groups who do not wish to wade through long flames.
> 
>  Nonsense.  You got such a warm welcome in talk.bizarre that you decided 
> to steal one of rdc's schticks and take it someplace he doesn't post to,
> in the hope of gaining some of his popularity without the hassle of having
> to be original or amusing all on your own.
> 
>> Plus, then all
>>the rec.pets nerds would cross-post into alt.flame, 
> 
>  Yes, and you've already seen what this has done to Roger's popularity in
> t.b.  Face it.  You're a cowardly little weasel, sophomoric insults and
> obscenity for shock value are the best you can do.
> 
>>and we already have a good supply of idiots over here.
> 
>  Then why are you trolling rec.pets?  If you truly wished to reduce the
> idiot population of alt.flame, the best thing you could possibly do is 
> unsubscribe.  Imagine the warm feeling of success at finally meeting a goal
> and doing something useful.  Huh?  Why, yes.  It -is- alot like when you
> wet yourself, only nobody will point and laugh.
> 
>> My policy is based on proper netiquette, and I have no plans to change it.
> 
>  Translation:  "If I actually posted this to rec.pets, they'd know I'm just
> a lame Carasso fan-boy".
> 
>> These posts are a lot less
>>boring than Ken's typical "you have been misinformed" posts.
> 
>  And who the hell died and made -you- judge of what the rest of us find 
> boring?
> 
>  Never mind, you're right.  Presumptuous, but correct.  If I wished to
> place a qualative value on how much more interesting you are than Ken,
> there are an infinite number of values between zero and 0.000001% that 
> should do quite nicely.
> 
>  Perhaps the both of you could just fuck off?
> 
> Jim Chagnon  jcc@frog.UUCP

Hey, wait a minute.  I'm a rec.pets.nerd, just browsing through the newsgroups
and saw Re: Rabbit-knowing as a subject heading.  That was MY post a few weeks
ago, and I'd love to know what the original alt.flame posting was in response
to.  Would someone let me know?  Why would a post about a pet rabbit generate
hostility?  Thanks for replies.

Ilana
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 11 Nov 92 18:25:09 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
: In article <kmR3TB12w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
: >weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
: >> In article <XFFZTB6w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes:
: >> >Leonard.Kinerson@p0.f110.n363.z1.fidonet.org (Leonard Kinerson) writes:
: >> >> Are There any people out there that voted For Clinton
: >> >> If So WHY!!!!!!!!!
: >> >
: >> >At a guess, it beats voting for a mealy-mouthed fascist hypocrite who claims
: >> >atheists can't be US citizens,
: >> 	didn't say this
: >
: >Your denial is singularly unimpressive, as I happen to have the entire quote
: >and a set of references to hand.
:  
: >#  RS: "Surely you recognize the equal citizenship and patriotism of
: >#       Americans who are atheists?"
: ># 
: >#  GB: "No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens,
: >#       nor should they be considered patriots.  This is one nation under
: >#       God."
: ># 
: >#  RS: "Do you support as a sound constitutional principle the separation
: >#       of state and church?"
: ># 
: >#  GB: "Yes, I support the separation of church and state.  I'm just not
: >#       very high on atheists."
: 
: >Feeling like a moron?  Since this posting is already far too long, I'll
: >refrain from commenting on your other stupid knee-jerk denials.
: >
: >> 	Get your facts straight before you mouth off.
: >
: >Take your own advice, loser.
: >
: >
: >mathew
: 	No, I'm not feeling like a Moron. What George bush said is 'I don't 
: know that they should be' which is NOT the same thing as stating that they
: should not be. I suggest you take a reading comprehension course before
: you take off on a knee-jerk assumption again. As for my other 'stupid
: knee-jerk denials' your evidence for them is probably about as impressive
: as this, which is to say- not very. Like I said before, Get your facts 
: straight before you mouth off. This time, follow my advice.
: 
: William Evere

Oooh!  Now, there's a distinction- he didn't flat-out say atheists
shouldn't be citizens; he just said he was mulling the matter
over...  Tell me, Willy-boy, if I was the president of the United 
States, and I told you I wasn't sure if limp-dick no-brain
bulletheads should be citizens or not, would you feel threatened?
Cuthbert
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar Samant)
Subject:  PORTRAIT OF A NET IDIOT: MAC (part 2)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 07:09:48 GMT


THE SECOND PART OF THE STORY OF the weeniest of all netters, a two-bit idiot
to end all two-bit idiots, the net.infant par excelllence ... none other than

	mike "MAC" bur!

MAC was a resourceful baby in his own way! When he found that he could not post
from ultisol.gsfc.nasa.gov, with a certain rude cunning he obtained an account
at nyx, already famous as a repository of a large number of clueless net bozos.

He had by then grown into his diploblastic stage, a time when infants begin
to utter two word sentences. Being precocious, he invented a nice little
signoff:

	"TA-TA FOR NOW!!"

These words have evoked murderous rage in many a reader, but lovable MAC is
unstoppable. His swift attacks and deadly counterattacks provide much 
intellectual fodder for freshmen around the country. Some of his best riposts,
full of deep inner meaning, are:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>MAC, you consummate asshole, fade away.
>
>Glg?
>
>TTFN
>M

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>Get a clue, MAC. Spare us your drivel.
>
>Feh.
>
>TTFN
>M

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>Why don't just stick to alt.cascades, MAC? 
>
>Bah.
>
>lamer
>
>TTFN
>M

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>Bur, you are a dipshit, you know that?
>
>Hey, hey!
>
>HEY!
>
>TTFN
>M

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And the MOST CREATIVE, where he uses BIG sentences:

>>BUR YOU RAM YOUR HEAD INTO YOUR CLOACAL VENT BOY!
>
>Hey wait a minute! Hang on right there!
>
>You are a loser.
>
>Ha ha.
>
>TTFN
>M

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I am the greatest fan of  m "imbecile" bur. His bozoic background chatter 
provides valuable comic relief. And he's too young to be flamed properly. I 
request everyone to take more kindly to this blithering idiot, it's an 
established fact that infants must be treated properly if they are to grow
up to something resembling reasonable.

Sincerely,