From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@earth.cc.mancol.edu>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
Originator: mmdf@nigel.ee.udel.edu
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 14:25:04 GMT

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 <INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU>... Unbalanced '<'
bellmail: error signal 11
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by earth.cc.mancol.edu (AIX  2.1 2/4.03)
          id AA01993; Fri, 31 Jul 92 10:25:04 EDT
Received: by manvax.cc.mancol.edu (MX V3.0) id 645; Fri, 31 Jul 1992 04:19:44
          EDT
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 04:19:40 EDT
From: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
X-Mx-Warning:   Warning -- Invalid "To" header.
To: "MartinRedmond"<MARTIN@manvax.bitnet
Message-Id: <0095E610.E7BBD680.645@manvax.cc.mancol.edu>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail

Received: from RICEVM1.RICE.EDU by manvax.bitnet; Fri, 31 Jul 92 04:09 EDT
Received: by RICEVM1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) id 6313; Fri, 31 Jul 92 02:41:46 CDT
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 05:53:12 GMT
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@EARTH.CC.MANCOL.EDU>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
To: 'Martin Redmond' <MARTIN@manvax.bitnet>
Reply-to: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was info-minix-request@UDEL.EDU
Comments: To: info-minix@udel.edu

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 <INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'
     
   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by earth.cc.mancol.edu (AIX  2.1 2/4.03)
          id AA27944; Fri, 31 Jul 92 01:53:12 EDT
Received: by manvax.cc.mancol.edu (MX V3.0) id 599; Fri, 31 Jul 1992 02:09:51
          EDT
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 02:09:47 EDT
From: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
X-Mx-Warning:   Warning -- Invalid "To" header.
To: "MartinRedmond"<MARTIN@manvax.bitnet
Message-Id: <0095E5FE.C296BBC0.599@manvax.cc.mancol.edu>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
     
Received: from RICEVM1.RICE.EDU by manvax.bitnet; Fri, 31 Jul 92 02:07 EDT
Received: by RICEVM1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) id 4870; Fri, 31 Jul 92 01:03:15 CDT
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 03:28:05 GMT
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@EARTH.CC.MANCOL.EDU>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
To: 'Martin Redmond' <MARTIN@manvax.bitnet>
Reply-to: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was info-minix-request@UDEL.EDU
Comments: To: info-minix@udel.edu
     
   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 <INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'
554 <MARTIN@EARTH>... Unbalanced '<'
     
   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by earth.cc.mancol.edu (AIX  2.1 2/4.03)
          id AA27757; Thu, 30 Jul 92 23:28:05 EDT
Received: by manvax.cc.mancol.edu (MX V3.0) id 582; Thu, 30 Jul 1992 22:14:00
          EDT
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 22:13:55 EDT
From: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
X-Mx-Warning:   Warning -- Invalid "To" header.
To: "MartinRedmond"<MARTIN@manvax.bitnet
Message-Id: <0095E5DD.CF5D0240.582@manvax.cc.mancol.edu>
Subject: Re: OS compare (Unix/clone)
     
Received: from RICEVM1.RICE.EDU by manvax.bitnet; Thu, 30 Jul 92 22:08 EDT
Received: by RICEVM1 (Mailer R2.08 R208004) id 0463; Thu, 30 Jul 92 21:00:21 CDT
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 22:30:35 GMT
From: Bill Pechter <pechter@OCPT.CCUR.COM>
Subject: Re: OS compare (Unix/clone)
To: 'Martin Redmond' <MARTIN@manvax.bitnet>
Reply-to: INFO-MINIX@UDEL.EDU
Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was info-minix-request@UDEL.EDU
Comments: To: info-minix@udel.edu
     
In article <1992Jul29.172406.29587@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
 torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Benedict Torvalds) writes:
>
>Having several different code/date-segments doesn't lend itself very
>well to high-level languages (it doesn't even work too well in assembly,
>but there the programmer often knows what he/she is doing).  Thus
>coherent 3.2 and minix don't even try: they keep to one segment, and
>limit all data to 64kB.  You can do a lot in 64kB, but I'd rather miss
>the experience.
>
     
I hate to say it - but back in the old PDP11 days they had overlays.
And learned to like them.
     
And we walked 50 miles to school, uphill, and we didn't have shoes then...
8-)
     
There is some satisfaction in shoehorning the most functionality in to
the smallest space.  The amazing fact that a PDP11 could multitask
with the same 64k of memory that ran CP/M was amazing to me.
     
I grew up with PDP11's and love the fact that RT11 can run foreground
and background tasks (up to 15 background tasks) in a machine with only
64kb of real memory is a fact that some people that haven't had to live
with those restrictions don't understand.
     
Unfortunately, you can't run X in that space, or NFS... Perhaps TCP/IP
though...
     
Bill
     
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Bill Pechter, N2RDI           | The postman always pings twice.
        Concurrent Computer Corp.     | pechter@ocpt.ccur.com
        2 Crescent Place, Oceanport, NJ 07757 - Tel:908-870-4780
--
Mail System (MMDF)
--
Mail System (MMDF)
-- 
Mail System (MMDF)