From: cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker)
Subject: Re: The world according to propeller-boy - part 1
Keywords: From: decay@
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 18:53:33 GMT

Tsk tsk tsk.

Darcy, it used to be fun to taunt you, in a morbid sort of way.
People derive much the same enjoyment level from flaming you as they
would from, say, taking a magnifying glass and burning ants on the
sidewalk.  Sure, it was no real challenge and sure, they knew the ants
had no possibility of fighting back, but just the same it was mildly
interesting for a brief time to watch them scurry around for a while
trying to avoid the light.  People knew that at any time they wished,
they could focus the light enough to make the little bodies curl up
and smoke, but why bother?  It was too much fun to watch them scurry.

But now, in a pathetic and desperate attempt to show that you really
can hurt SOMEBODY, SOMEWHERE, you chortle about someone being a
victim of childhood sexual abuse.  It's as if one of the ants on the
sidewalk, in some inexplicable burst of intelligence, had finally
figured out the root cause of the painful light.  But this ant,
instead of bravely rushing to sting its tormentor, instead busied
itself by pushing its brothers into the path of the oncoming beam,
pointing and screaming "BURN _THEM_!  BURN _THEM_!"

It's kinda sad that this should be your last grasp at recognition,
but so be it.  Things are tough all over, Darcy, and the enjoyment
I get from flaming you is no longer worth the blot on my karma that
arises from recognizing you as a minor player.

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:

>In article <1992Jul26.030845.238082@cs.cmu.edu> garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
>>#n article <1992Jul26.001305.18495@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>>##n article <3739@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
>>##In article <1992Jul25.004750.14804@noao.edu# forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
>>##
>>###If an adult teacher at the front of a classroom sneering and smirking as
>>###his/her child pupils roll condoms on and off cucumbers, isn't adult/child sex,
>>###what the hell is?   If you filmed it, you'd have a porno movie!
>>##
>>##Suzanne, my SO asked me to tell you that he finds you disgusting,
>>##and he said that he is willing to explain to you just what
>>##adult/child sex involves...
>>#
>>#Willing to explain, as in, speaks from experience? 
>>
>>[Direct quote from my SO]
>>
>>Yes, as in, speaks from experience.  From the ages of 9 to 13, I
>>was sexually abused.  

>Thank you for that vital piece of information, Mr. Virtual S.O., maybe 
>next time you toss out titillating little references like this, you'll 
>learn to provide some CONTEXT with them so folks will know what the hell 
>you're talking about, hmmm???

Context, Darcy?  Context?

If you are that desperate for details on child sexual abuse, no doubt
there are any number of illegal publications that will satisfy your
sweaty fantasies.  Producing, distributing, and even _owning_ child
pornography is, of course, illegal under federal law, but I have no
doubt that if you're this anxious to satisfy your fantasies you will
find a way to obtain some.

>>Fuck you.

>Sorry, dear, you're not my type.

This may be part of your larger problem, Darcy.  The inability to
distinguish consensual sex from violent acts seems to be a common
quality of those who enjoy the action, or even the thought, of 
sexually abusing children.

To clarify, Darcy, this was not an invitation.  If Susan was thinking
of engaging in any act at all with you, it no doubt involved sharp
blades, lemon juice, chain saws, and quite possibly a large and
unfriendly man named Guido.

>>If you don't understand this, then I hope that someone sticks a
>>dick up your ass so that you can understand.

>Not _my_ preferred mode of communication, as it happens.

This _is_ odd, considering the continuing fascination you have
shown with the subject.  Is it that you simply prefer to watch?

>>[end quote]

>								- Kevin

                    -rocker
Newsgroups: alt.flame