HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: petersm@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU (Marguerite Petersen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Does anyone know the name of this movie?
Keywords: Airplane, 1950s, crash
Date: 6 Sep 92 22:55:02 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Outreach Services - Oregon State University

In article <17172@ulysses.att.com> rjs@ulysses.att.com (Richard Steinberg) writes:
>Does anyone know the name of this movie?  Here are the salient facts:
>
>1) There was a mysterious crash of an airplane.  One engine went out--a one in
>a million chance, but then, the other engine also went out, why?  The
>stewardess survived.  In order to determine what went wrong, the flight of the
>downed plane is re-enacted as closely as possible.  The stewardess describes in
>real time exactly what happened on board and every detail is reproduced.  The
>answer turns out to be a cup of coffee she brought to the pilot.  After the
>first engine went, the coffee cup spilled into an opening in the cowling and
>killed the second engine.
>
>2) Probably an American movie from the 1950s.
>
>Any information about this movie, viz., the name, the actors, the year,
>and plot clarification would be most appreciated.

This movie was called "Fate is the Hunter".  It was released in 1964 and
starred Glenn Ford, Nancy Kwan, Rod Taylor, and Suzanne Pleshette.  

  Spoilers Ahead (Just in case. :-)

I just saw this movie on tv last week.  The plot is pretty much as you
described except for one small detail.  The coffee that was spilled did
not kill the second engine.  What it did do, is short out some wires.
Thus making the crew (both in the original flight and in the re-enacted
one) believe that they had lost the second engine.  Luckily the pilot
in the re-enacted version still had his first engine as he had just
shut it down and it was not disabled by fire.  Thus, Glenn Ford was
able to keep flying the plane and did not have to crash land as the
original pilot had.

Marg
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: hopkins@agora.rain.com (Scott Hopkins)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: Open Communications Forum
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 05:21:16 GMT

In article <iroderic.716311710@cunews> iroderic@alfred.carleton.ca (Ian Roderick) writes:
>In <1992Sep11.182957.8093@nntpserver.chevron.com> jjdti@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.D.Tilander) writes:
>
>>Somebody mentioned Golam-Globus(sp) in this vein, and I don't know if this 
>>was one of theirs, but for some reason I remembered my most embarassing:
>
>>BOLERO with Bodacious Bo Derek.  WHat a piece of trash.
>
>>-- 
>>Janet Tilander
>>Chevron Exploration and Production Services Co.
>>San Ramon, CA
>
>
>Don't forget _Tarzan,_the_Ape_Man_.  Gee John, just how many times are
>you going to get Bo to fall in a river or pour water on herself?  A
>very subtle filmic device for getting Bo's white shirt transparent.
>
>BTW I'm told John Derek has a fixation about painting naked women with
>whitewash.  Apparently it was also alluded to in one of his earlier
>films, or so I'm told.  Can anyone verify.
>
>Ian

Bo was covered with white paint in Tarzan.  Had something to do with the big
native guy wanting her that way I believe.  Is this what you're talking about?

	-Casey
From: muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au (Murray Chapman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Blade Runner: What's the significance of Unicorns?
Date: 15 Sep 92 03:24:49 GMT
Reply-To: muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au

In <14SEP199217244758@moose.cccs.umn.edu> rao@moose.cccs.umn.edu (Rao V. Akella) writes:

>I haven't read the book, so I have no idea what the Unicorns mean.  Could
>someone who knows PLEASE explain their significance in BR?  It's driving me
>CRAZY! :-)

In some drafts of the story, Deckard dreams of a unicorn.  Gantt leaves an
origami unicorn outside Deckard's apartment, for one of two reasons:

	1) The unicorn is symbolic of Rachael.... "not a normal horse"
		(a la "The Glass Menagerie")

	2) Gantt knew that Deckard dreamt of a unicorn.
		(ie Deckard was a replicant)

>-- Rao Akella    <rao@moose.cccs.umn.edu, rao%moose@umnacvx.bitnet>

Murray Chapman
muzzle@cs.uq.oz.au
From: sdt8s@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Steve Tilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: FREDDY AS FRO7
Date: 11 Sep 92 01:51:22 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Virginia

cobarruvias@asd2.jsc.nasa.gov writes:
> In article <1992Sep10.031412.10965@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
> sdt8s@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Steve Tilson) writes:
> >Just what was this movie? I missed it. Intriguing title.
> >Please respond.
> >
> It was a stupid, poorly thoughtout cartoon. It was so bad, my daughter and I
> left after one hour and I forgot that I saw it until I read the post.
> 
> Dont bother watching it, renting it, reading about it, IT SUCKS
> >--
> >You are a true believer. Blessings of the state, blessings of the masses.
> >Thou art a subject of the divine, created in the image of man by the masses,
> >for the masses. Let us be thankful we have an occupation to fill. Work 
> >hard...increase production...prevent accidents...and be happy. (THX-1138)
> >
> 
> 
Good. I was afraid I'd missed something really outlandishly
good. I guess the fact that the theater was only giving it
matinee shows should've tipped me off...

Thanks all,
Steve
--
You are a true believer. Blessings of the state, blessings of the masses.
Thou art a subject of the divine, created in the image of man by the masses,
for the masses. Let us be thankful we have an occupation to fill. Work 
hard...increase production...prevent accidents...and be happy. (THX-1138)
From: boucher@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Richard A Boucher Jr)
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 21:08:14 GMT
Subject: Re: Blade Runner Directors Cut
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies



I believe it's starting 9/19 in Palo Alto at the Varsity.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: donnell@sponge.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Subject: Re: TRIVIA:  Potemkin quotations
Organization: none
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 00:21:39 GMT

In article <1992Sep8.000141.26600@news2.cis.umn.edu> nichols@math.umn.edu (Preston Nichols) writes:
>I have been for some years been accumulating a list a movies which quote or  
>pastiche (part of) the very famous "Odessa steps" sequence from Eisenstein's
>masterpiece "The Battleship Potemkin". (To jog memories:  soldiers descending  
>the steps abreast, firing into the crowd as they go; a man with glasses shot in  
>the eye; the baby carriage rolling down the steps)
>
>The Untouchables (Brain de Palma)
>Brazil (Terry Gilliam)
>The Monitors (U.S., about 1970, director unknown to me)
>
>I have this feeling that I used to know of another one, but have forgotten.
>
>Can anyone add to this list?

You have listed all the ones that I could think of, but I do have more info
on "The Monitors"

The Monitors
1969 Bell and Howell Productions
Producer: Bernard Samlins
Director: Jack Shea
Screenwriter: Myron S. Gold

It's kind of a rambling film, and when I saw it, I was too young to catch a
potemkin reference. Let me know how the list turns out!

					--Judex--
From: kachun@astro.as.arizona.edu (Ka Chun Yu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Blade Runner Director's Cut (SPOILERS)
Date: 15 Sep 92 23:26:01 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

In article <1992Sep15.150201.4468@jade.tufts.edu> gharris@jade.tufts.edu (George W. Harris) writes:
>In article <1992Sep15.015103.9692@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> kachun@astro.as.arizona.edu (Ka Chun Yu) writes:
>>Just from what I've heard about the production, it seems that the scene
>>was filmed on different days, and when they came back to shoot it again,
>>the marquee had changed and they couldn't do anything about it.
>
>	Except, of course, all of Blade Runner was filmed on a backlot set of
>Los Angeles with much set-dressing.
>

Most of it was, but I think that scene was filmed on a real street with a
real movie theater in the back.

>gharris@jade.tufts.edu          "She had ever chance for happiness, ever 
>George W. Harris                chance in the world, and stomped ever one 
>Dept. of Mathematics            of them chances down in the dirt like a 
>Tufts University                bug."   _The Devil's Dream_


--
*Ka Chun Yu                 * "Deputy dog dog a ding dang depa depa deputy     *
*kachun@as.arizona.edu      *  dog dog a ding dang depa depa . . ."            *
*                           *                         --"Don't Let's Start"    *
From: caruso@socrates.umd.edu (John Caruso)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: EMBARRASSING: JOE V VOLCANO??
Date: 4 Sep 92 23:55:37 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland University College

In article <Sep.4.17.09.27.1992.12947@athos.rutgers.edu> trudel@athos.rutgers.edu (Jonathan) writes:
>HF.SKW@forsythe.stanford.edu (Susan Wandling) writes:
>>Secondly, "Joe vs the Volcano."  Again, I think, a nearly great comedy.
>
>Yes, most definitely.  Now, one thing that has bothered me - how many
>times to you see that crooked line/logo in the movie?  Here's what I
>come up with:
>
>The walkway to Joe's job.
>The crack in his wall.
>The Lightning Bolt
>The line of peasants with torches going up the volcano.
>
>Any others?

That's all that I found (but I think there are more).  Did you notice
the symbolism?  The lightning bolt always showed up in a context where
powers, natural or otherwise, were conspiring to take away Joe's self-
determination.

"Nearly great" is a perfect description of Joe vs. the Volcano--it only
has a few missteps, mostly near the end of the film.  It was offbeat and
original, with substance behind the humor.  I liked it a lot.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: msb@sq.sq.com (Mark Brader)
Subject: Re: Best War Movies?
Organization: SoftQuad Inc., Toronto, Canada
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 20:39:24 GMT


> > > Another good "arctic" war movie is _49th Parallel_ ...
> > It's certainly not "arctic" in the same sense as THE BEDFORD INCIDENT or
> > ICE STATION ZEBRA.
> Hey - I'm a Virginian, the 49th parallel is DEFINATELY arctic! :> 

This 1941 film is an interesting combination of tourism advertising and
war propaganda.  According to Maltin, it was retitled "The Invaders" for
the U.S. market.  This is actually a more accurate title, since the movie
contains no scene set at the 49th parallel.  The story begins on the
Hudson Bay coast; the point may be south of the Arctic Circle, but most
Canadians would consider it Arctic anyway.  It then moves south and west
to the Rockies, and then back east to finish at Niagara Falls.  (For those
of you weak on geography, Niagara Falls is on the Canada/US border, but
not on the part of the border which follows the 49th parallel.)

If I recall correctly, one of the Mounties who appeared briefly in the
movie was played by a man who later became president of the Canadian
Pacific Railway company.
-- 
Mark Brader		    "How is freedom gained?  It is taken: never given.
SoftQuad Inc., Toronto	      To be free, you must first assume your right
utzoo!sq!msb, msb@sq.com       to freedom."		-- Salman Rushdie

This article is in the public domain.
From: bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Robert Church)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 5 Sep 92 04:16:01 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Ohio University School of Art. Athens

In article <elambert.715465765@qualcom> elambert@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Eber Lambert) writes:

>But in the Mel family the ULTIMATE worst was the movie Marty Feldman
>did with Louise Lasser around 81.... cant remember the name but Marty played
>a monk who broke his vow of silence... Is was so bad that my wife and I

But what about the line, (with Peter Boyle playing an alchoholic priest 
as he offers a swig of cheap wine to Feldman) "You'll be amused by it's
humility".
I remember an article pointing out that several members of the cast died
of sudden cancers just after this film. I can't remember the name of it
just now though.



-- 
*********************************************
*    bob church                             *
*    bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu           *
*    D-8195 NFS #27                         *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: hopkins@agora.rain.com (Scott Hopkins)
Subject: Re: Name this movie...
Organization: Open Communications Forum
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 21:37:31 GMT

In article <BuE107.AE6@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> gfritz@sage.cc.purdue.edu ("Happy Fun Ball") writes:
>Can anyone identify this movie:
>
>I think Ralph Machio (spelling? -- the Karate Kid guy) is in it.  What little
>of the plot I know... This guy is hiding from someone (maybe the law?).  He
>hides out at a high school, where he stays at night.  He befriends a janitor
>(who I think is a black musican -- maybe).  I seem to remember a scene of
>the guy rollerscating down the halls and tearing down posters of himself.
>
>I know it's very sketchy, but it was a long time ago, and I came in half-way
>through the movie and didn't watch a lot.  I do remember one thing very
>clearly, and that is the song "Crying" by Roy Orbison is played during the
>movie and I think even one of the characters whistles it.
>
>Anyway, if anyone can match the above mess with a movie, could you send me
>a title and a summary of the movie for me?  Thanks a bunch.
>
>Geoff
>--
> ==============================================================================

Could it be Teachers?  With Nick Nolte & JoBeth Williams?

Actually it sounds like the movie with Jon Cryer (I can't remember the name!)
instead of Ralph Macchio.  He turns into a punk to hide out?

Anybody?

	-Casey

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rice@mirage.rtp.dg.com (Brian Rice)
Subject: THE LINGUINI INCIDENT
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 23:12:46 GMT
Reply-To: rice@dg-rtp.dg.com (Brian Rice)
Organization: Data General Corporation, RTP, NC.
Keywords: Bowie Arquette Balint bad_career_move
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies

(spoilerettes)

The studios apparently did not choose to distribute THE LINGUINI
INCIDENT here in flyoverland, so I had the pleasure of seeing it
on video last week, some time after its quiet demise in the
theaters.

The film starts out as a standard debonair-non-American-must-
marry-PDQ-in-order-to-get-green-card flick, and then segues
into other equally fatigued ideas.  David Bowie looks like
he would rather be singing "We are the goon squad and we're
coming to town (beep beep)."  Rosanna Arquette does not really
succeed in inhabiting her character, which may be to her credit.
Eszter Balint, my reason for seeing this movie, does indeed
manage to make her character credible and engaging; her character 
also has the most nearly original comic conceit; and she is not
particularly well integrated into the main plot.  For this reason 
one gets the feeling she's in the wrong film.  Perhaps we'll get
to see THE RETURN OF THE SELF-DEFENSE BRA someday.

Gratuitous swipes at feminists, although the cranberry juice was
pretty funny.

Notice to directors and cinematographers: showing us a brightly-
lit bridge is not enough to convince us that a movie is set in 
New York.

On a scale of -4 to +4, I'd say -3.  On the monetary scale, I'd
say that you should definitely rent the video if (a) you think,
as I do, that Eszter Balint is totally righteous, or (b) the 
video store will also wax your car.

--
Brian Rice   rice@dg-rtp.dg.com   +1 919 248-6328
DG/UX Software Quality Assurance
Data General Corp., Research Triangle Park, N.C.    
"Als ich von dir denke, strahl' ich wie ein Kernkraftwerk."  --Cynthia
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies,rec.video.releases
From: steinman@me.utoronto.ca (David Steinman)
Subject: Re: Holden's Eyes (was Re: Blade Runner...(SPOILERS))
Organization: UofT Mechanical Engineering
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 18:56:11 GMT

bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby) writes:

>Hate to spoil a thread here, but if replicant eyes glowed and
>human eyes didn't, what do you need the Voight-Kampf test for?

I was going to ask the same thing, but then I rationalized it as follows:

The Voigt-Kampf test obviously measures some sort of eye response.  I
suppose the questions are designed to elicit an "unconscious" or
preprogrammed response unique to replicants, who can otherwise control this
glowing.

I haven't read Dick's book, but I assume the Voigt-Kampf test is explained
there.  The above is my best guess.  Blade fanatics may feel free to correct
(but not flame) me.
--
Dave!


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mem@mv.mv.com (Mark E. Mallett)
Subject: Re: What are those Negroes doing with guns?
Organization: MV Communications, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 21:23:00 GMT

In article <BD.92Sep6142331@fluent.UUCP> bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU writes:
>I disagree,  If poster has enough knowledge of a person to characterize
>her as "so far to the left she can't even walk straight" I think he
>should know how to spell her name.
> ...
>Sorry, Gilbert.  He hit a raw nerve.  It seem like McCarthyism (sp?)
>is making a bit of a comeback, and it rankles.

Pretty darned funny, if you ask me.

If he had said "Opera (sp?)" then I guess it would have been OK.

Time for the Select Committee on Unamerican Spelling.  :-)

-mm-
-- 
Mark E. Mallett  MV Communications, Inc./ PO Box 4963/ Manchester NH/ 03108
Bus. Phone: 603 429 2223    Home: 603 424 8129     BIX: mmallett
Internet: mem@mv.MV.COM  ( uucp: ...{decvax|harvard}!mv!mem )
Looking for news and mail in southern NH / northern MA?  Try MV!
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27741 rec.arts.sf.movies:7066 alt.cult-movies:7902 rec.video.releases:2816
From: tesmer@pandora.bio.purdue.edu (John Tesmer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies,rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Holden's Eyes (was Re: Blade Runner...(SPOILERS))
Date: 15 Sep 92 02:02:20 GMT
Organization: Purdue University, Dept. of Biological Sciences

In article <1992Sep14.223425.26944@nas.nasa.gov> fineberg@nas.nasa.gov writes:
>In article <BuL0Ln.3DH@me.utoronto.ca>, steinman@me.utoronto.ca (David Steinman) writes:
>|> bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby) writes:
>|> 
>|> >Hate to spoil a thread here, but if replicant eyes glowed and
>|> >human eyes didn't, what do you need the Voight-Kampf test for?
>|> 
>|> I was going to ask the same thing, but then I rationalized it as follows:
>|> 
>|> The Voigt-Kampf test obviously measures some sort of eye response.  I
>|> suppose the questions are designed to elicit an "unconscious" or
>|> preprogrammed response unique to replicants, who can otherwise control this
>|> glowing.
>|> 
>|> I haven't read Dick's book, but I assume the Voigt-Kampf test is explained
>|> there.  The above is my best guess.  Blade fanatics may feel free to correct
>|> (but not flame) me.
>|> --
>|> Dave!
>No one's eyes glowed in the book.  Blame the screenwriter.
>


Personally, I think you guys are taking this too far.  I thought the reason
why people's eyes lit up while they were taking the Voigt-Kampf test is 
because the machine is scanning the pupils of the person taking the test...and
this involves some light!  So naturally they would seem to glow as the machine
is projecting light into their eyes...It has nothing to do with whether the
person is a replicant or not.

Besides, as I understand it, these replicants are almost 100% organic, including
the eyes (remember the scene where Roy meets his eyes' maker??)...nothing very
mechanical about THOSE eyes.  So why in the hell would their eyes ever glow?
As is repeated throughout the movie, they are very hard to tell apart from humans,
so much that an autopsy would have a hard time revealing it.  I mean, it would
be kind of dumb to "build-a-better-robot" and then blatantly put light bulbs
in the back of their sockets.

So unless it is specifically written somewhere that this effect was put in 
intentionally (beyond the Voigt-Kampf test) I refuse to believe that it was
a product of the lighting on the set (I mean, don't cat's eyes glow in the
dark?).

BUT...still a great film! ;)

jjgt
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: teshima@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (A. Lani Teshima)
Subject: Spielberg stop filming Jurassic Park
Keywords: Hurricane Iniki, Kauai
Organization: University of Hawaii
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 08:46:48 GMT

Steven Spielberg, who was on the island of Kauai in Hawaii filming
Jurassic Park, was one of many people visiting the Garden Isle when
Hurricane Iniki hit this past Friday.

He and the film crew all packed up and left to the mainland today, and
filming has been put on hold until later notice. Although damage to
the other islands has been "minimal" considering the severity of the
Category IV Iniki, the island of Kauai has been completely devastated.
Reports from the island report that at least 80% of the structures
have been affected, many completely torn apart (including many very
expensive homes).

Spielberg, who was staying at the Westin Kauai, said he hoped never to
live through such an experience again. "The groaning of the earth with
winds at 160 miles per hour was phenomenal."

--Please keep in your thoughts all the people of the Garden Isle who
must now pull their lives together.--


--
A. Lani Teshima (teshima@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.edu)       o | /_/_/ "Sea Hare"
Student, UH School of Library & Information Studies     o|<0_0>--------*
A small mind is easily filled with faith.                 \=^-| |____| | 
Blessed is a mind too small for doubt.                        \_}B   \_}B
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Films with no females
Date: 10 Sep 92 15:42:38 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

In article <1992Sep9.134543.6232@citib.com>, ken@agassi (Ken Nodini) writes:

> What about :
> 
> 	"One A.M." with Charlie Chaplin (1916)
> 	"Towed in a Hole" with Laurel and Hardy (1932)
> 	"Busy Bodies" with Laurel and Hardy (1933)
> 	"Twice Two" with Laurel and Hardy (1933)
> 	"Dirty Work" with Laurel and Hardy (1933)
> 	"Midnight Patrol" with Laurel and Hardy (1933)
> 	"Sleuth" with Michael Caine and Sir Laurence Olivier (1972)
         ^^^^^^

My god man!  That's brilliant!!!  I *never* would have thought of _Sleuth_!

(Is this starting to resemble a Monty Python movie to anyone else?!?!?!)

Greg Bole                               "Are you coming?  Yeah, well see the 
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu             train moves, not the platform."
                                       John Lovitz in _A Leauge of Their Own_
From: thomas@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Beagle)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: whatever-happened-to endings
Date: 13 Sep 92 02:43:37 GMT
Organization: Datamark International Ltd.

In article <1992Sep12.171503.24448@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sorourke@lonestar.utsa.edu (Sean J. Orourke) writes:
>In article <BuFq66.A2I@well.sf.ca.us> rchao@well.sf.ca.us (Robert Chao) writes:
>>
>>I am interested in what films end the way American Graffiti ended, that
>>is, where they quickly mention whatever happened to each character. The
>>other ones I can think of are The Commitments, and the French Connection.
>>And Animal House.
>>Which other films end this way?
>
>Nine to Five did.

Meet the Feebles did!
 
I think the elephant worked in horticulture... :-)
-- 
    Thomas Beagle | thomas@datamark.co.nz    or | A beagle a day keeps        
Datamark Intl Ltd | thomas@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz | the doctor at bay.
 Technical Writer | 		      Vote MMP!
	I live in a sane society, I don't *need* a disclaimer.
From: "tom betz" <tom.betz@execnet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: most embarassing movie
Date: 8 Sep 92 22:38:29 EST
Reply-To: "tom betz" <tom.betz@execnet.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Executive Networks Information

Quoth Mike Haskell regarding MOST EMBARASSING MOVIE on 09-08-92:

MH> What is the most embarassing movie you have ever seen?

I can't remember the name; but there was a French 'art' film about 1984 
about a hermaphrodite.

Toward the end, after much travail, his/her female lover asked "Where will 
you go?"  He/she replied, "New York.  They are more accepting there of 
people like me." 

The New York audience just cracked up at this unintentional hysterical 
moment.

Hadda be one of the worst films I ever saw.
 

---
  WinQwk 2.0 a#299  The more you run over a cat, the flatter it gets.
--
Executive Network Information System  (914) 667-4567
International ILink Host
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies