HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: Why Bush? (was: Why Clinton)
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 03:24:58 GMT

In article <1417@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
>weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
>: In article <1409@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
>: >vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:

>
>The original post was wrong, Willy, only if one clings to a
>curiously mule-headed literal-mindedness.  The convo, if memory
>serves, went something like this:
>
>Interviewer: Surely you recognize that atheists are citizens
>			 of this country?
>
>			 Our Only President: No, I'm not sure they should be
>			 considered citzens...
>
>			 Now, if there's a way to interpret that which doesn't
>			 involve the President of the United States questioning
>			 the right to citizenship based on religious belief, I

	You really need to learn how to pay attention. No, I mean this. You
really should see someone about this problem.
	Now that you've shown you can remember the supposed 'proof'. Let's see
if you can remember that that wasn't the point. If you can extend you memory
all the way back to the original post, you'll see that this 'proof' does not
support the orinal statement, which is what I was arguing with.

William Everett
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: K e n Needs No Macros (was Re: Information needed)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:56:40 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.182039.12585@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>
>In article after article after article,
>krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>
>
>>K e n is K e n, and you are
>>misinformed.
>
>tell us, k e n, since you use this phrase verbatim in so many of your posts,
>do you have a macro for it? or maybe a whole set?
>
>Alt 1 K e n is K e n, and you are misinformed
>
>Alt 2 Initiate standard washing procedures
>
>Alt 3 K e n is K e n, and therefore K e n cannot be boring

K e n has no use for macros such as these, for they are useless and
irrelevant, sort of like yourself.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: K e n makes a lousy philosopher
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:09:47 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.134717.29233@Princeton.EDU> datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
>	In an earlier post, K e n wrote:
>
>>The answer is not life. Life does not end continuously. It is eternal.
>>The situation of death is merely a transformation. Your question uses
>>the phrase "but ends continuously", meaning that something actually
>>ends.
>>Eternal things, by definition, do not end. K e n's answer is still
>>correct.
>
>	Life is eternal? Tell that to me dear departed gran'da.

Death is a transformation from what you consider life into something
typically referred to as the afterlife. Your grandfather is still alive,
but in a dimension that cannot be reached from here.

>	And yes, K e n, you do exist only to amuse me. I thought you
>knew--I'm a hedonistic solipsist.

Your occupation is irrelevant.

>Tep--still misinformed and lovin' it!

Analogous to: "I'm so high on drugs and loving it!"

Better seek help now, before it becomes too late.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Troll, the Master Baiter  [was Re: Pennsylvania]
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:12:03 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>  ... troll, i wonder how you can flame
>australia and then defend pennsylvania. you really are a master debater.
>

No, just a master baiter.  That's why it calls itself "troll".

-- Andy
From: krobinso@brickred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: K e n is K e n (was Re: Just Wondering)
Date: 22 Nov 92 20:30:46 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1eocjaINN8nd@endeavor.ksu.ksu.edu> cress@endeavor.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress) writes:
>
>
>I don't know for sure but it appears that this K e n has Jesse Jackson
>syndrome i.e. megalomania.

K e n does not have any diseases, for K e n applies effective washing
procedures when required.

>If not, he sure enjoys using his name in the 3rd person alot.

K e n refers to K e n as K e n, for what else can K e n refer to K e n
as? K e n uses such linguistics to inform the misinformed that K e n
is K e n and K e n can only be K e n, for K e n is K e n. Misinformed
people tend to be confused and refer to K e n as something K e n is not,
thus K e n must reply and inform these confused beings that K e n is not
what they claim K e n to be, but rather K e n is K e n, because K e n
can only be K e n, thus K e n is K e n.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bbufalin@nyx.cs.du.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 00:25:12 GMT

In article <1ebrqfINN6n3@venture.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>
>In article <t!6wH#64za@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@cattycorner.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov16.215335.27051@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>>>hey bufalini. how cuome yer always defending k e n? (sorry, i didnt bother 
>>>to repost the whole long article with bufalini's pointless one line k e n
>>>imitations sprinkled among page after page of quoted text)
>>
>>I am just pointing out the truth, which Tilden was unable to accomplish.
>
>I was unable to accomplish?  I think you're mistaken, Ken was mistaken, not I.
>There was an answer.  I posted the answer, which, I will restate, was life.
>I was not to blame for Ken's inadequacy to answer the question so you are wrong.

You printed that the statement "K e n is K e n and therefore K e n is not a 
liar" could not be true.  You were unable to print the truth.

>>>do you do this so ken will continue to let your give him rim jobs?
>>
>>No, I did it to correct Tilden.
>
>I did not ask nor desire your help.  I was arguing with Ken, not you.
>You have errored and brought this upon yourself.  I have no forgiveness
>for stupidity. Now, I must slander you. 

But you were in need of help; therefore, I helped you.

>>>are you more like a parrot, or just a mirror? what kind of an asshole
>>>are you, anyway?
>>
>>I am neither a parrot nor a mirror nor an asshole.  Guess again.
>
>No, you're a combination of all three!  You talk nothing but shit and 
>admire yourself for it.

I speak only the truth.  And I am not a combination of those three things.
Better luck next time.

>Tilden has spoken

Tilden has spoken in error, that is.

--
Bruce A Bufalini <bbufalin@nyx.cs.du.edu>
"Blame Is Better To Give Than Receive." -- Neil Peart, 1980
"Take it easy -- or any way you can." -- Brian "Launch Pad" Mansberry,
                                                         among others
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Cast your vote: Troll vs. Lara
Date: 23 Nov 1992 15:21:21 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <1992Nov16.165519.19898@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>,
rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>
>>> handle?  Let's see, because all you big baddies like Rob Dobson, Lara, and
>>> MBur just scare me so much *not*.  What I choose to call myself is of no
>>> consequence to you as you're being roasted by my flames, just as the name of
>>> the undertaker handling your worthless shell when you die won't matter either.
>>
>>  Sorry.  Lara's the only one of those mentioned who's not too scared of
>>  me to reply to my posts.  Rob is positively scared to death of me.
>
>I believe the phrase you are looking for is "bored to tears BY you" not
>"scared to death OF you". syntax, my boy, syntax.
>
> He's
>>  even dropped that silly .sig he had and is just now recovering a little.
>
>I dropped the .sig cause my newsreader automatically inserts it. And i figured
>it was slightly inappropriate to have "University of Virginia Music Library"
>so close to phrases like "you smegma eating bandwith wasting conservative
>shitsack, I wish i could rip your head off and cram it up Rush Limbaugh's
>ass, but you'd like it too much." But i have a special .sig just for you.
>
>>  As for MBur...  well, that's kinduv like talking to a rock.
>
>I have had many conversations with rocks, all of them much more scintillating
>than any of the hemmorhoids i have heard coming from Bur.
>
>>
>>>* I had to leave to do schoolwork, but I'm back because due dates were moved
>>>  up, lucky you.  And, sorry, you can't pick on me.  Go back to picking the
>>>  fleas off of the rest of the baboons in your little troop- Bur, Lara, Rob,
>>>  Aza, &etc..
>>>
>
>>  I'm just waiting for you to lose it and start foaming at the mouth
>>  with nothing but your usual contentless obscenities.  Then I'll declare
>>  victory and leave you stamping around piping in a shrill voice:
>>
>>    "I won!  I won!  I won, I say!  Let's take a poll!"
>>
>>  Face it.  Kennie got too boring and you're the next loser on my list.
>
>Once again I vote for NONE OF THE ABOVE. what losers.
>--
>           __________
>          /          \
>         ( _____      \
>          |            |
>          |      _     |
>     ______\/   ( \    |___\      Rob Dobson
>           /\    G |   |   /      rwd4f@poe.acc.virginia.edu
>          /      (/    |
>         ( )           |
>          |___\        |
>           UUU|
>    ouch!     |
>           __/
>          (
>           \____
>
>
>be sure to penetrate thoroughly, all the way through the back of your
>skull.  there's a good chap.

well, robbie, i like this so much i had to repost it just for the
giggles!  troll's head being pierced by an arrow.  but how will we
be able to tell the difference once he begins spewing again?
enquiring minds, and all :)

moi
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw)
Subject: Re: Two in Hemet
Organization: Corporation for Open Systems
Distribution: na 
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:43:56 GMT

In <Nov.22.07.58.42.1992.5238@romulus.rutgers.edu> kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu (Theodore A. Kaldis) writes:

>In article <16060006@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com> tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:

>> There is someplace even stupider...

>> Baker, California has on main road that is about a half mile long...

>> Along this main avenue in between other small services lie:

>> 15 CHINESE FUCKING RESTAURANTS ! ! !...

Hmm? Was this people trying to screw a building, or two buildings
engaged in the sex act? Or just a general architectural orgy?
Inquiring minds want to know. :-)

>And a Burger King and a greek diner.

>[The losers coming back from Vegas must love Chinese.]
>-- 
>The views expressed herein are my   ||  Theodore A. Kaldis
>my own only.  Do you seriously      ||  kaldis@remus.rutgers.edu
>believe that a major university as  ||  {...}!rutgers!remus.rutgers.edu!kaldis
>this would hold such views???       ||

REB

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: K E N is, as usual, wrong as rain
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:54:15 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.181744.12488@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>In article <BxxyCI.K1v@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov13.223722.29962@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>>>> krobinso@orange.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>
>>>>K e n has not rented your canine pet. K e n sees no purpose in doing
>>>>such an activity, thus K e n will not do it, and has not done it.
>>>>It is quite obvious, as usual, that you are misinformed again. Please
>>>>gather information next time before posting, for your information
>>>>gathering techniques are pathetic and require much more practice.
>
>>>K E N, while I understand your motivation in lying, I must inform the
>>>alt.lame crowd that you have, in fact, rented my dog--or rather, rented
>>>his services. I even have a cancelled check from you.
>
>>Indeed, Mr. Dobson. Are you really this misinformed?? K e n does not
>>require services rendered by canine creatures. K e n does not write out
>>checks to misinformed individuals. K e n is K e n, and you are
>>misinformed.
>
>Deny it on the .net all you want, k e n, me n my dawg are laughing all
>the way to the bank.

And won't you and your dog look silly trying to cash something which
does not exist. K e n suggests you refrain from experimenting with
mind-altering drugs and seek out professional help.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: The Limey tries once again (was Re:American pratt.)
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:08:31 GMT

In article <974@dsbc.icl.co.uk>, kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:

> No that's not clear, you arsehole.  Did you read my post or are you
> just too wound up.  Listen, you flag-waving, halfwit, lame-brained
> bastard.  The point you were attempting to reply to actually points
> out that your fucking constition only deals with religious equality.
> Contradicting that statement with one that proves the point only shows
> what an arse-licker you really are.  Does quoting your goddamned
> constitution give you are hard-on or somthing.

How is English tea these days? Kevin, so that Rob does not expend his energies
on you, I will take the time to point out what sort of a benighted limey moron
you actually are. I'm not sure what they taught you in Freshman Logic, but
Kevin, your reasoning is downright primitive. In fact Rob does have a point. If
you were ever able to understand the brilliance of a Constitution you would
know that in fact, ours does not give "equality" to any sort of religious
_establishment_ unlike the The Church of England. The wording is "no law
respecting" and it means exactly what it says, a difficult concept I am sure.   
Funny that you should imply quoting our Constitution would give Rob a 
hard-on.... why don't you quote from yours?? What's that Kevin? Having a little
problem with that one? Ah yes. That's right, the English never really got
around to that. So I guess in all fairness, Rob is getting a hard quoting our
Constitution, but Kevin can't even get it up.

--The Phantom
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Stephen Kuhn
Date: 23 Nov 1992 15:26:27 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <1e99csINNkfe@huon.itd.adelaide.edu.au>,
alex@cs.adelaide.edu.au (Alex M. Farkas) writes:
>In article <92320.174104SWK105@psuvm.psu.edu>, Stephen Kuhn <SWK105@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>|> Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.out-of-body,alt.pagan
>|> Subject:    Psychics and other related phenomena
>|>
>|> Does anybody out there really, truly, and above all, HONESTLY Believe in all of
>|>  the psychic,etc., BULLSHIT?
>
>If you left yourself logged in and some other half-baked hero posted this article
>then
>  BE CAREFUL IN FUTURE,
>else
>  It's so kind of you to share your ignorance with all of us - please keep your opinions
>  to yourself or post them to alt.net.abusers if you wish to disregard other peoples
>  interests.

 ... i think if you hit that little 'enter' key more frequently your
posts might cause less nausea.  just a thought, i could be wrong
.... naa, i couldn't be wrong.  less nausea, definitely.  not NO
nausea, that'd require much more effort,
>
>.not-worth-my-effort
oh, sure it is, don't be so hard on yourself, you CAN learn :)

moi
>>---|>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Why Bush? (was: Why Clinton)
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 05:02:26 GMT

In article <1409@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>, libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
> You guys have been arguing this "Bush didn't say that" horseshit

"horseshit" Ah. Bill has enlarged his vocabulary. Excellent Bill. You have been
listening to those "Power Tapes" by Tony Robbins haven't you?

>  What else could he have meant, Casper 
> the Phriendly Phantom?  C'mon, give it a try.

Ok. Here's a try: You have the attentionspan of an old man fornicating. You see
wilbur, HE DIDN'T SAY THAT. That was in the original post. And if he did... so
what? He's not president any more! You won ok? By continuing this pathetic
attempt at wit and Socratic reasoning, you only further the point that you can
only manage baseless arguements. So which is it, Billy Boy? Are you a moron or
do you have the attentionspan of an old man fornicating? You decide... but
alas, choose well for it is a decision that will stick for the rest of your
life.  

> Oh, and while yer at it, enlighten us with your wonderful views
> on original intent.  

Now, original intent, well, you just bring some point in the Constitution that
you already are so willing to point at, and a Supreme Court decision, and I
will happily debate it. Happy Hunting.

--The Phantom
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC)
Subject: Re: Pennsylvania
Followup-To: alt.flame,misc.test
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 01:42:25 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.204629.1931@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>troll, luckless pennsylvania resident, spews:
>
>
>>*What's that?  Your school full of West Coast PIGS was so desperate that you
>>had to call in a special team of educators from PSU just to teach you to clean
>>your own toilets!?!  Geezus, I hope for their sake that you guys at least knew
>>how to wipe your own asses *doubtful*!
>>
>>					Troll of Pa.
>
>Pennsylvania. What a great fucking state. I mean, stretching from the
>miserable urban blight of the Philadelphia area, acrosss the boring
>Amish interior, through the nuclear wasteland of Three Mile Island, all
>the way to the inbred, coal mining mountain areas of western pennsylvania
>where studies show that 59% of the populace actually thinks they live
>in west virginia, not pennsylvania. god, troll, i wonder how you can flame
>australia and then defend pennsylvania. you really are a master debater.



Good thing Virgina voted for Bush, huh Rob?
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K E N is, as usual, wrong as reign
Date: 23 Nov 1992 15:19:56 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <1992Nov16.164537.19647@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>,
rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>In article <1992Nov13.214851.1@opie.bgsu.edu> bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:
>
>>Maybe ken *has* rented your pooch, but ken is not K e n, and
>>K e n has spoken the truth when he said that he has not rented
>>your dog.  If you still insist that K e n has done such a thing,
>>then you arte hopelessly misinformed.
>>
>>--L e a h  S c h o l l
>>
>
>O MY GOD! Its replicating!! quick, someone at psu hit ^C, k e n is
>S P R E A D I N G!!!
well, rob, after all, you DID say to him, hey, * * * , my dog's
here, spread 'em, didn'tcha????


moi
From: bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Cast your vote
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:23:11 GMT
Organization: Bowling Green State University

>i must admit, a discussion about whether pictures of naked 10 year olds
>belong on a.p.b.erotica is more interesting than your typical alt.flame
>thread. So lets take a little survey, ed anger style:

>[ ] Yes, Rob, I agree with you and all the other God-fearing [tm] people
>in this country and on this net who say that there is no place for 
>pictures of naked 10 year olds ANYWHERE in this great country. i think
>perverts who post such pictures should be strung up by their balls.

>[ ] No, Rob, I agree with Atheists of America and all the other namby-
>pamby liberals who think that ANYTHING, even fucking 10 year olds, is
>ok as long as it doesnt represent traditional, fmaily oriented,
>christian values.

>[X] I vote for troll

--Leah
Newsgroups: alt.flame,rec.humor
From: krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Subject: Re: Where's K e n?
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:04:00 GMT

In article <lefty-191192131019@lefty.apple.com> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>In article <Bxxyzu.KFE@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@yellow.crayola.cs.psu.edu
>(Kenneth J Robinson) wrote:
>> 
>> K e n always has information handy whenever it is required...
>
>Say, F'Ken, I need to know the value of Planck's constant in the
>furlong/fortnight/hundredweight system.  D'you have _that_ handy?

The information for which you have requested is irrelevant, thus K e n
does not have it handy. Your request has been denied.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Troll, the Master Baiter  [was Re: Pennsylvania]
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 10:57:43 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
> >  ... troll, i wonder how you can flame
> >australia and then defend pennsylvania. you really are a master debater.
> 
> No, just a master baiter.  That's why it calls itself "troll".

HAW HAW!@

THANKS FOR EXPLAINING THE JOKE ANDY!@!@
I GET IT!@!@  MASTER BAITER!@!@  LIKE POTATOE!@!@

ANYONE ELSE STILL NOT GOT IT?@?@


mathew

Newsgroups: alt.flame