HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Honesty, Your word, and Trust -- a crisis?
Date: 27 Jan 93 09:31:28
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
Distribution: na
	<MARTINC.93Jan25233544@grover.cs.unc.edu>
	<ewright.728090833@convex.convex.com>
	<1993Jan27.135232.7185@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grover.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com's message of Wed, 27 Jan 1993 13:52:32 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.135232.7185@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:

   In article <ewright.728090833@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
   >In <MARTINC.93Jan25233544@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
   >
   >>The part that seemed reminiscient of someone in particular is the part
   >>where they (1) over-literalized (2) transformed your statement into a
   >>crisp black-and-white statement (3) realized that wasn't precisely what
   >>you meant, 
   >
   >So, Charlie, do you *ever* say what you mean, or mean what you say?
   >
   >And just what did you mean by this post, anyway?  
   >

   Its pretty damn obvious what he said. Right on target too.
   You know it or you wouldn't have responded but in the lifestyle of
   beating a dead horse here we go again.

Now, now, do you imagine I meant Ed?  *I* certainly never said that.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
Xref: sparky soc.singles:37714 alt.sex:43026 alt.peeves:19516
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex,alt.peeves
Subject: Sometimes you just have to ask...
Date: 24 Jan 93 07:30:09 GMT
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper

johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
]  
] Nice hooters.

Ok, are there Like, well, UnNice Hooters?


ciao
drieux

ObPeeve: Attack Of the KillerHooters!


-- 
MajorModernDayProblems: 

sometimes, a thing will happen after another thing, 
and they may not be connected..... 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: gdb15@grebe.cl.cam.ac.uk (Guy Barry)
Subject: Re: SM ISO MAIL
Reply-To: gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk
Organization: U of Cambridge Computer Lab, UK
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:22:25 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.040131.21412@sol.UVic.CA> atovorni@engr.UVic.CA writes:
>In article 10561@ringer.cs.utsa.edu, sgokhale@lonestar.utsa.edu (Shashank S. Gokhale) writes:
>
>>hey you yes you. why do you make fun of people like this?
>
>I will attempt to answer your question because you are the only one in
>history to reply to one of these very volatile flames. Man, do you have
>guts! 
>
>Essentially, soc.singles is a discussion group where regulars go around
>exchanging ideas about any topic that comes to mind. I would have blasted you
>no matter what you wrote because what you wrote was a PERSONAL AD!!!!
>
>I am giving you a clue: soc.singles regulars like myself get extremely
>PISSED OFF when they see personal ads. If you go into a pub and scream out
>"HEY! ALL YOU GIRLS OVER THERE! I'M LOOKING FOR WOMEN! I WANT TO TALK TO YOU!!!"
>What do you think their reaction would be?

Precisely.  You're allowed to go into a pub with the sole intention of
picking up MOTAS, as long as you never explicitly admit it.  It's
exactly the same with this newsgroup.  (For most people it's about 
as successful, as well.)

--
Guy Barry, University of Cambridge | Phone: +44 (0)223 334757 
Computer Laboratory                | Fax: +44 (0)223 334678
New Museums Site, Pembroke Street  | JANET: Guy.Barry@uk.ac.cam.cl 
Cambridge CB2 3QG, England, UK     | Internet: Guy.Barry@cl.cam.ac.uk
From: jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JOSEPH ALOYSIUS MCVEIGH)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: The Classiest Pickup Lines
Date: 21 Jan 93 20:42:48 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:>>
>> Is bringing a purple unicorn into a bar solely for purposes of sex
>> inherently unclassy?

xanadu@t-bone.cs.unlv.edu (Thomas Wilson) writes:
>Absolutely.  You should take a consenting unicorn someplace private
>where it won't feel uncomfortable.   ]-)

But suppose the unicorn and escort are paid entertainers for the evening?

Anyway, if they're in a bar, only Jerks and Shameless Hussies, classless to
the core,  will see them. BFD.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Aloysius McVeigh |"Marcus Aurelius tends to appeal to people fighting
   jm0i@.Lehigh.edu     | suicidal urges, eccentric politicians and those on
       **********       | the edge generally." - Steve Coates, Wall St. Journal
       "N.I.N.A."       | [On the book Bill Clinton calls his "most important"]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Steve Martin no longer in vogue?
Date: 26 Jan 93 20:43:15 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman (BBN)
NNTP-Posting-Host: spcink.bbn.com

In article <1993Jan22.181609.25910@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>In article <lm0bahINN2vb@news.bbn.com> dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan22.163759.23167@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:

>>>    "Babies feel a lot better going in than they do coming out."
>>>-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
>>Are we related or something?  My mother says that statement was the 
>>sum total of sex education that she received from her mother.
>
>I don't think we are related, but your mothers mother and I *may* share a
>brain!  I may not have been the first to say that, but I never heard
>it anywhere else but in my own mind - so it's original.  I guess. 

Actually, the way my grandmother said it (when asked where babies come
from) was "Babies come out the same way they go in, only it's more fun
the first time."

>Dawn:  you might post that grandparents thing to misc.kids.  Also,
>where does one acquire music by this "Bongwater" you quote? :-)

I found it in Tower records.  They probably haven't made the pukier
chain record stores.  The quotes are from their album _The Power of
Pussy_ which is the inspired Word Of Goddess Received From Above.
They have other albums, but they're just pretty good.

Yeah, I was going to post something like what I ended up posting to 
misc.kids, and then do something longer about what was REALLY going on
to all 100,000 of my close personal friends here (Do people here really
believe that there are 100,000 people reading this shit?  Does that
make us some sort of weird celebrities?) but then I chickened out and
posted the brief version here and nothing in misc.kids.

Dawn
-- 
"You have this adorable and misguided notion that death is something really
radical and cool but I still can't help being attracted to your fresh-faced
uncompromised tatoo-ed rebel stance and god damn, I'd like to help you
sing your tune."  "Folk Song..." by Bongwater
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
Subject: Re: Credibility and Trueness
Organization: Society for the Promulgation of Cruelty to the Clueless
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 01:54:34 GMT

In article <ewright.727932461@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:

>The problem with being content is that it ensures you will never
>achieve anything more than what you've already got.

I have to provide counterexamples to that.  I was content as a grad
student (well, with academic stuff, anyway); I still achieved a Ph.D.
I was content with my job a few years ago; I still got promoted to
Vice President.

I'll agree that not being content gives you more of an incentive to
change things.

>  Change requires
>some effort, and summoning that effort requires some level of discontent.
>You just have to be content with that. ;-)

Nope, I can summon effort even from a contented situation.  Maybe not
as much, but when you're sufficiently competent, it may not require as
much :-)

>Discontent can, however, rise to the level where it paralyzes you.
>To prevent this, it is important to recognize the fact that you may
>fail, at least temporarily.  As Dirty Harry said, "A man's got to
>know his limitations."

(I think I'm getting this quote slightly wrong.  Tough.)
"It is not reasonable to expect the universe to change to accommodate
you.  Therefore, all progress is due to unreasonable people."

Seth
From: dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: SM ISO MAIL
Date: 22 Jan 93 15:23:24 GMT
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman (BBN)
NNTP-Posting-Host: spcink.bbn.com

In article <1993Jan22.000846.10561@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sgokhale@lonestar.utsa.edu (Shashank S. Gokhale) writes:
>>
>hey you yes you. why do you make fun of people like this?  were you not seeking
>a SO at anytime?
>
>*talk about people who cannot be serious!!*

They weren't making fun of him because he's looking for a girlfriend.
They're making fun of him because this isn't a correct place to post
a personal ad.  Personally, I don't think that the accent jokes were 
very funny, but that's Usenet.  It's an anarchy and the only way we 
can enforce rules is to point and laugh when you break them.  (Actually,
I think that might be a good idea in the Real World too.)  He can
either post personal ads to alt.personals or soc.penpals, or he can
join in the conversation here.

Dawn
-- 
"You have this adorable and misguided notion that death is something really
radical and cool but I still can't help being attracted to your fresh-faced
uncompromised tatoo-ed rebel stance and god damn, I'd like to help you
sing your tune."  "Folk Song..." by Bongwater
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Wall)
Subject: Re: Living alone and liking it
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 20:23:06 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.172746.24396@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>In article <1993Jan22.160804.2543@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jwall@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Wall) writes:
>>In article <16557@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>>>Yea, but have you ever seen him in Latex?
>>No, but that's beside the point.  I want to see Stef in Latex (especially
>>if she looks like Garfield)
>
>Stef?  Are you orange and furry with black stripes and lasagne stains?  :-)

Damnit Nance you're ruining my come-on/suck-up/ now stop it :-)!!!

Cheers,

Jeff Wall
From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Credibility and Trueness
Date: 27 Jan 93 23:56:53 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <MARTINC.93Jan27144040@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

>Even Sasz has repudiated that book.

Since he's still selling the book, and promoting it at lectures,
I find that surprising.

Oh, there I go again:  Assuming that what Charlie wrote is what
Charlie meant.  Silly me!
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Die Fledermaus)
Subject: Re: Could be worse (was: Re: Upper Midwest
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 06:16:04 GMT

In article 9503@zooid.guild.org, Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org> () writes:

>Hey!  Did I miss a US vs. Canada debate?

Now it's a beer debate, eh? 

dreas
From: pdsmith@bbn.com (Peter D. Smith)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Could be worse (was:
Summary: Canada: tough bastards
Date: 22 Jan 93 20:07:45 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

>Someone writes...
>   > >Leaving us with godless Communists on this continent and only Canada for
>   > >protection.
>   >

Canada is the only country in the entire world to ever defeat America
more than once (and not by a little bit, either; they whipped our butts).

They're also just about the only country in either of the Americas whom
we haven't managed to invade (succesfully).  We took half of Mexico,
we partitioned Columbia, landed marines just about everywhere, and even
controlled Cuba, but we've never managed to do anything to Canada.


				Peter D. Smith
				"or just Peter" (tm)

ObSingle: Polar bears rarely, if ever, consider dating Penguins.
From: carl@sscl.uwo.ca (Carl Kaufmann)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Flirting How To Guide/Backrubs
Date: 26 Jan 93 21:37:48 GMT
Organization: Soc.Sci.Comp.Lab., U.West.Ont.

In article <JULIE.93Jan25184327@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu>, julie@cucbs.chem.columbia.edu (Julie Wright) writes:

> Well, Trygve, you make a very valid point here.  After all, it's clear
> that those of us who don't like backrubs are physically unaffectionate,
> sexually disfunctional, cold-hearted, and generally no fun at all.  The
> rest of you should stay well away from us out of fear of our lack of
> mental stability and ability to care about others.  Besides, you might
> never get laid with someone who didn't get into activities involving
> lying still.

Speak for yourself Julie.  I'm physically unaffectionate,
sexually disfunctional, cold-hearted, and generally no fun
at all, but I love backrubs. :)

*******************************************************************************
*  See how the heart reaches  *  Carl Kaufmann   *    Trust is the ultimate   *
*  out instinctively, for no  * Soc.Sci.Comp.Lab *    aphrodisiac.            *
*  reason but to touch.       *    U.West.Ont    *                            *
*        -Kate Bush           * carl@sscl.uwo.ca *       -Me                  *
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (dreas)
Subject: Re: How Does your Name Sound?
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 00:45:11 GMT

In article 22808@netcom.com, desiree@netcom.com (dmc) writes:

>In article <lm6krqINNh1u@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> smith@wesson.Eng.Sun.COM writes:

>>John F sez:
>
>>>Shit. How are you supposed to make fun of a name like Taylor?   I suppose
>>>I could say that you'll never have a contest for a pronounciation of *your*
>>>last name.
>>>
>>>neener-neener-neener
>>
>>WHAT??? 
>
>	What part of that don't you understand?

If some people's children would stop being so damn insecure and
pretentious, their problems would be diminished a great deal...

dreas

Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex,talk.bizarre
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: An Over Due Apology
Followup-To: sci.skeptic,soc.singles
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 08:05:23 GMT

About Subject: Re: Dangerous Ideas Afoot

It seems that there are a LOT more Sick and
Twisted Devotees of Olivia [<token>] Newton [<token>]
than I had expected.

We are hoping that they will all be recovering soon.

ciao
drieux

ps: and some of them I had respect for as 
responsible adults.....


-- 
MajorModernDayProblems: 

sometimes, a thing will happen after another thing, 
and they may not be connected..... 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Credibility and Trueness
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:20:16 GMT

In article <ewright.727981082@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>In <1993Jan25.051224.25468@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
>
>>	Seems Charlie owes me a sheepskin. Ed, here's your clue: 4 dates
>>does not constitute a relationship, 
 
Eddie would that four date relationship(oh gawd this guy is killin me)
be from a dream this year(that being your post-pubescent period)
or last year(your pre-pubescent period)?
 
>
>No, but it seems you do qualify for a degree from the Jimmy Dutton
>School of Reading Comprehension.
 
I'm comprehending a poster. I'm comprehending a runny nose. I'm
comprehending a pocket protector with a bugger collection.
 
>
>The dictionary defines relationship as follows: a romantic or 
>passionate attachment.  No mention of time.

While you have it handy(as usual) look up acaulescent.
 
>
>You shouldn't try using big words like that unless you know
>what they mean.

You shouldn't whine in every post after the age of diapers. Oh go ahead then.
 
================================================================================
 Steatopygias's 'R' Us.          doh#0000000005 That ain't no Hottentot.
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. AMA#669373 DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: desiree@netcom.com (dmc)
Subject: Re: Favorite Groups
Summary: Sunday evening and I'm bored
Organization: Anti-Bad Music League
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 01:44:43 GMT

In article <1993Jan24.234120.21420@netcom.com> rohwerwd@netcom.com (W. David
 Rohwer) addresses the masses from atop Mt. Olympus:
>Rob (he's cool) Thurlow spake:
>>Rohwer's typical twitish droppings:
>>
>>>     Sure and by the way I am 30.  I like, in alphabetical order:
>>
>>[Mr. Data dumps his database]

		(this line has nothing to do with the content
           of this post, I just liked it and wanted to see it again...)

>     Guy Barry asked and I answered him with who I liked.  Computer
>generated? Nah.

	Rohwer, get real.  Guy Barry asked if people listen to good
music (or something similar) these days...  I have to say, from my
viewpoint, the bulk of your list does not constitute good music.
ABBA?  God.  You should be shot, you really should...(or be forced
to hang with Dan Holmes for an extended period of time...)  He didn't
ask for people to list out in alphafuckingbetical order the groups
they liked the mostest.  A simple yes or no would have sufficed.

>>Hint: if you're trying on any level to portray yourself as a human
>>being with warmth and emotions, it's not working.
>
>     Fine.  I can not control how others perceive me.  I can only control
>my own actions.  If you perceive me the way that you do, then fine.  You
>do not know my motivations and what I am trying to accomplish, if I am
>trying to accomplish anything, by posting here.

	La dee fucking dah.  Get off your high horse Rohwer.  Stop
trying to justify yourself all the time.  

>>You come across
>>in almost any article I read by you as a logical little automaton
>>with Spock ears.  If that's really what you're like, please accept
>>my apologies for making a big deal about it.
>
>    If that is the way that you interpret how I am by my posts,
>then I can not change how you interpret me.  After the PSC thread,
>I believe that I have revealed more non-logical things about myself.
>If you don't see that, then fine.

	If you're trying to fake a Moscny on us here, you're failing.
Miserably.  If you're trying to show your ability to respond to jibes
with humour; you're failing.  If you're trying to rationalize, and
be cool, calm and logical in all things --- you're succeeding.  Jesu!
You're a cold fish, Daveymeboy.  Gotta loosen up before you start to
crack.

	
Desiree

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
Subject: Re: Ferret iso SF for hopping good times...
Organization: Society for the Promulgation of Cruelty to the Clueless
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:58:04 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.170755.25669@bnlux1.bnl.gov> schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:

>Just once, I'd like to see a personal ad from someone seeking head
>games.                

Well, I like playing with people's minds.

But I save it for important stuff, like poker games.

Seth	[and USENET postings]
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Second Date
Date: 26 Jan 93 22:12:37 GMT
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
NNTP-Posting-Host: grover.cs.unc.edu
In-reply-to: bmeyer@feds12.prime.com's message of 26 Jan 93 17:39:15 GMT

In article <4621@cvbnetPrime.COM> bmeyer@feds12.prime.com (Bob Meyer) writes:

    Also, If you sleep together on the first date,
    does the next day count as the second date,
    or just the first date, day two?

Followups to talk.philosophy.
--
		Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu
     Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
	    3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
     "Oh God, please help me be civil in tongue, pure in thought, and able
      to resist the temptation to laugh uncontrollably.  Amen." -- Rob T
From: souchay@CAM.ORG (Francois Souchay)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: The Classiest Pickup Lines
Date: 23 Jan 93 02:56:43 GMT
Organization: Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada

In article <1993Jan22.064326.23715@midway.uchicago.edu> ss19@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <28223@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sierra.sybase.com (Mysti Rubert) writes:
>>[On e-suckups]
>>He hasn't claimed a false sense of
>>familiarity, he has claimed to appreciate my writing.  As a tech writer,
>>that most universally despised producer of things no one wants to read,
>>it's nice.  
>   As a tech writer for a _database_ company, where no one even
>wants to even _admit_ that the documents in question even exist,
>let alone read them, it's nice.

The place where I used to work encouraged the phone support & application
engineers to help the tech writers as much as possible, on the sound basis
that a bit of help before the books go out avoids a bunch of confused
phone calls later. After one manual missed the vetting process, we kinda
made sure all the subsequent releases made it our way first.

"Ok, I plugged my card to the hot and ground, and it blew up! Oh, you
mean hot is +5 volts, not 110? Ooops. Well, it didn't say so in the manual."

Francois.
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Companion
Date: 28 Jan 1993 08:12:14 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
NNTP-Posting-Host: carina.unm.edu

In article <1993Jan26.193443.7161@doug.cae.wisc.edu> matthewk@cae.wisc.edu (Matthew Thomas Kotowski) writes:
>Hi, I am new to this school.  I am doing graduate work in nuclear
>engineering.  I did my undergrad work at University of Coloroda-Boulder.
>UW-Madison or are thinking of cumming here to study, e-mail me and let me know

Actually, what scares me more than this, a personal ad placed in the wrong
newsgroup, is that this gentleman is going to do work in nuclear engineering.
Controlling massive piles of explosive materials.
Your life in his hands.
And he spells 'coming' like 'cumming'.
I think the word that comes to mind is 'disgusting'.
r.
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: *How* did you meet your SO (And do they know?)
Date: 21 Jan 1993 14:32:43 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
NNTP-Posting-Host: carina.unm.edu

In article <1993Jan21.113151.16829@infodev.cam.ac.uk> gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk writes:
>>>>"We met at nine..." "we met at eight..." "I was on time..." "no, you
>>>>were late..." "Ah yes, I remember it well."
>>>For the totally clueless out there, this is from _Gigi_.
>>And for those under 30, "Gigi" was a broadway musical from long back. :)
>I'm under 30, and I posted the original quote.  Doesn't anyone listen
>to any decent music any more?

Yeah, we do, that's why we had to tell people where the quote was from.
r.
Newsgroups: soc.singles