HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bob@olwejo.UUCP (Bob Kupiec)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: The New Bearcat 2500XLT-D (and 8500XLT-D)
Date: 12 Jan 93 03:18:52 GMT
Reply-To: olwejo!bob@cs.widener.edu
Organization: Olwejo - Private UNIX System

In <1993Jan11.142101.14148@cbnewse.cb.att.com>, parnass@cbnewse.cb.att.com writes:
>Uniden won't have sales literature for consumers on the
>2500XLT and 8500XLT until the end of February.

I talked to a person at Bearcat today (1-800-423-1331) and was told that
the release date for the 2500xlt is April and for the 8500xlt, September.
Four months, I can hardly wait!

Some tidbits of info that I gleaned was that the 2500xlt is *SMALLER* than
the 200xlt, but functionally similar.  Also the scan rate is 100 ch/sec.
This sounds quite fast.

She also said that the 800MHZ cellular band is locked out in the CPU and
*WILL NOT* be easily restored.

That's all I know so far...

-- 
\/\  Bob Kupiec - Amateur Radio Packet: N3MML @ wb3ftp.#epa.pa.usa.noam  /\/\
/\/\  Internet: kupiec@hp800.lasalle.edu (or) bob%olwejo@cs.widener.edu /\/\/
\/\/\   Geographic: Morrisville, PA, USA     40d 12' N / 74d 48' W     /\/\/\
/\/\/\    Top 10 uses for your Intel CPU:  Number 10:  Test hammers   /\/\/\/
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: riyadth@boi.hp.com (Riyadth Al-Kazily)
Subject: Looking for PRO-35/BC-100XLT info
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 23:15:32 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company / Boise, Idaho

Hello,

    I am trying to find ways to modify my scanner (Radio Shack PRO-38),
and I need a little more information.  What I need to know is what scanners
use what microprocessors.  With this information I can try to add features
to my scanner, based on the features available to other scanners with the
same processor.

    My main desire is to find out information on scanners with similar
frequency ranges to see if they are based on the same chip.  Then I can
get a service manual and examine the details.

    My most likely 'target' is the Radio Shack PRO-35/Uniden BC-100XLT.
If you know what the processor in this unit is, please let me know.  I
would love to add 90 more channels to my lowly PRO-38.

What I know so far:
PRO-38:		UNIDEN UC-1143		[80 pin surface mount quad pack]
PRO-2025:	UNIDEN UC-1116 (US/Canada) or UC-1152	[30 pin DIP]

What I want:
PRO-35:		?
BC-100XLT:	?

Can you help??  Thanks very much..

			-Riyadth Al-Kazily
			 riyadth@hpbs1904.boi.hp.com

-- 
{ Riyadth Al-Kazily  riyadth@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com riyadth@hpbs1904.boi.hp.com }
{ (208) 323-4987         | When am i going to have time to use all this     }
{ Boise, Idaho           | stuff I'm collecting?  More important, how can   }
{ DoD #295  1983 BMW R65 | I get more stuff?  Amiga 500+ (+ stuff, that is) }
From: lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org (Mr. Lyn R. Kennedy)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: mail-to-news failure
Date: 4 Jan 93 08:00:56 GMT
Organization: Radio Amateur k5qwb

daemon@cs.utexas.edu (Background Processes) writes:

> >> The way I read the FCC/APCO 16 A&B NPSPAC standards: one of the
> >> interrupt a conversation in progress when it receives an emergency
> >
> >This is another typical mis-representation. Unless the transmitting
> >unit is full-duplex, it will continue transmitting, blocking that
> 
> I was under the impression that when the Ebutton was pressed, that the
> controller "ruthlessly pre-empted" the lowest priority user i.e. rips
> the repeater out from under the user.  No?

Even though that's possible, the mobile unit that is transmitting 
doesn't know it. So it continues transmitting on the mobile frequency 
which is the input to that repeater. It's one of those 'turn off your 
receiver and await further instructions' situations. :-)

BTW, some Motorola systems assign a repeater to each 'emergency' button 
pusher. It locks on the air and stays with that sub-fleet. If several 
do it, presumably the first few would get a channel and everyone else 
would be locked out of the system. I notice this usually gets disabled 
fairly quickly after a new system is brought up.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 
73,            internet     | lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org
Lyn Kennedy    packet radio | K5QWB @ N5LDD.#NTX.TX.US.NA
               pony express | P.O. Box 5133, Ovilla, TX, USA 75154

-------------- "We have met the enemy and he is us."  Pogo --------------
From: plaws@uafhp.uark.edu (Peter Laws)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Iraqis attack Kuwait
Date: 7 Jan 1993 12:44:16 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Anybody get any good hits on Mil Aero or HF???

Peter Laws|GEnie:P.LAWS1|"The '90s are gonna make the '60s|plaws@uafhp.uark.edu
n5uwy@ka5bml.ar.usa.noam| look like the '50s"  --D. Hopper|plaws@uafsysb.bitnet
From: anon.550@pax.tpa.com.au
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: None supplied
Date: 10 Jan 1993 04:11:24 +1030
Organization: PAX - Public Access Unix (Adelaide,South Australia) - Anonymous Service
Reply-To: anon.550@pax.tpa.com.au
NNTP-Posting-Host: flash.pax.tpa.com.au


Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Police MCT Units
Summary: 
Expires: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Keywords: 

In article <1993Jan7.201922.1@novax.llnl.gov> urbina@novax.llnl.gov writes:
>In article <gregs.2jvd@hotcity.COM>, gregs@hotcity.COM (Greg Stramback) writes:
>> 
>> i used to have the frequency, but i lost it (no reason to monitor when you
>> don't have the equipment to decode it.  it's 800MHz)  anyway, i do know people
>> (2) that do monitor it, through their own specialized equipment, but i have
>> heard that it can be done using a Pakk-ratt pk232 node converter, though don't
>> quote me on this, since it's only something i heard about...
>> 
>> greg
>
>
>
>
>I wonder if the Mobile Display Terminal is an electroluminescent display, super
>twist LCD display or regular CRT. If it is a regular CRT display, it may be
>possible to pick up the screen RF via the Van Eck method. the drawback would be
>that you would have to follow the patrol car as he/she goes about his or her
>rounds. But then again knowing Motorola, they probably would have some sort of
>TEMPEST standard or Faraday cage around the terminal.
>
>Guy
>Urbina@novax.llnl.gov
>

 I did some research on the San Jose system at one time, the freq used here in 
San Jose was in the VHF Lowband. The terminal used from motorola was
a MDT-840 system. It speaks the ARDIS protocol(at least according to a
motorola rep I was talking to at the time, and the San Jose PD
doesnt use the encryption option I believe. I did have a decoder lab in
southern calif interested in designing decoder software at one point.
Perhaps I will dig up my old notes and pursue this again, the decoder lab
required a recording preferably DAT which I wasnt equipped for at
the time but I am now... I will let you folks know....
   
    go in peace
    Jensen    

--
** Anonymity & Privacy by PAX - Public Access Unix (Adelaide,South Australia) **

anon.admin@pax.tpa.com.au (a human)   anon.info@pax.tpa.com.au    (for help)
anon.ping@pax.tpa.com.au  (get alias) anon.key@pax.tpa.com.au     (register key)
anon.###@pax.tpa.com.au   (reply)     anon.post.grp@pax.tpa.com.au (post to grp)
anon.list@pax.tpa.com.au  (to mailing list about anonymous mailers)
anon.subscribe@pax.tpa.com.au         anon.unsubscribe@pax.tpa.com.au

For dialup Unix access phone +61-8-235-9010 - online registration.
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: hhh@phoenix.oulu.fi (Harri Hatunen)
Subject: Radio Shack in the Nerherlands address??
Reply-To: hhh@zombie.oulu.fi
Organization: University of Oulu, Dept. of ShitWare
Distribution: alt.radio.scanner
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 16:30:15 GMT

Could someone give me contact info on Radio Shack in the Netherlands,
or a Realistic seller address/phone/fax.
   I'm intend to buy a Pro-2006 from the Netherlands, that's why I
need these for.
   Also, could someone say, how much a pro-2006 costs in the
Netherlands?
   Thanks, Harri Hatunen
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: cheangk@coral.micro.umn.edu (Pitt)
Subject: FAQ and scanner modify doc. (which sites?)
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis: Under Grad Workstation Lab.
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 08:23:06 GMT

Is there a site or more than one site that carry the FAQ of this newsgroup or some files about the modification of scanner?
Your information will be very greatful to novice like me. Thanks in advance.

Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: chelf@lunatix.uucp (Chad Helfenberger)
Subject: Re: Mods to a BC855XLT
Organization: Lexington Public Access Unix. -KY- (606) 255-9121
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 19:55:41 GMT

In article <C0GG05.1qI@bcstec.ca.boeing.com> rfweber@bcstec.ca.boeing.com (Robert F. Weber) writes:
>
>Doesn't anyone out there know to modify a BC855XLT to store more than
>its normal 50 channels and to cover the cellular frequencies???
>Maybe the guy that posted late in '92 that he has a BC855XLT that is
>modified to store 100 channels and receive cellular freqs would
>respond with how he did it.

I was the guy that posted late in '92 about my 855.  The only
thing I can tell you to do is get the November issue of
Monitoring Times, because I *cannot* explain it.. I'm not
experienced with electronics at *all*, and I'd feel bad if I gave
someone wrong instructions or something.. It involved jumping a
resistor to another resistor and cutting one.  I think..  I
really can't say..

-- 
Chad Helfenberger
(chelf@lunatix.uucp)
From: "derek buchler" <derek.buchler@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: another approach to f
Date: 4 Jan 93 13:25:21 EST
Reply-To: "derek buchler" <derek.buchler@channel1.com>
Distribution: alt
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

derek.buchler@channel1.com (derek buchler) writes:

DB>> I think that it would be illegal to do such a thing since it is illegal
DB>> to broadcast anything about police activity and law enforcement.   What
DB>> you are suggesting is the equivalant (sp?) of my radar dector going off
DB>> and then picking up my CB mike and relaying the info.  This is
DB>> definitely a no-no.


Lyn Kennedy lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org  wrote.

MLRK>Excuse us, but what country are you from???? Not a democracy, I hope.

Sorry to inform you that I live in the same country as you do.  You may
not like the rules but that is the way that they are written.  You may
want to check into the local laws in Texas.  I'm sure that you will find
that they are similar.

Derek

---
  SLMR 2.1a  Always send the big guy for the money.
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA
From: phase@cybernet.cse.fau.edu (Phase)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: 800MHz < $225 ???
Date: 10 Jan 93 22:08:32 GMT
Organization: Cybernet BBS, Boca Raton, Florida


 Could someone please E-mail me the number/address
of a company of mailorder place that sells Scanners capable of the 
800mhz+
 rangers, for less than $250 bucks?

I am extremely new to this (never even used a scanner) and would like to 
get into it. Could someone send me a description of a scanner that scans 
800mhz ranges, plus the number of the company that sells it?
  It must be able to scan the lower 40-500mhz as well.
                          thanx, e-nmail only please

                      phase@cybernet.cse.fau.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: brett@surfpix.princeton.edu (Brett Borowski)
Subject: Info and info request on antennas
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 17:02:50 GMT

Howdy!
  I'm trying to find the best antenna(s) to use with my BC200xlt.  I'm
primarily looking for something that will be portable, but am also
interested something I can put on a table in my apartment or on the roof
of my car....
  Right now, I'm trying two products from Radio Shack...
The first is the $10 telescoping scanner antenna....It works well for
VHF-lo, VHF-hi.  Good for UHF, and Fair for 800mhz.  In any case, it's
better than the rubber duckie that came with the scanner.

The second, is a bit of a kludge.  It's the black rubberized portable cell
phone antenna (claimed to be "high gain" with 3db of gain).  It was
$25, and the TNC-to-BNC adaptor was $5.  This works very well for 800mhz,
pretty well for UHF, seemingly quite acceptable for VHF-hi, and 
non-existant for VHF-lo.

Of course, I've only had experience with the three antennas mentioned,
so my qualitative assements are all relative.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

Brett

-- 
brett@surfpix.princeton.edu		(Finger for more info...)
From: todd@beretta.UUCP (Todd Wall)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Cordless Freqs.
Date: 7 Jan 93 04:47:35 GMT
Organization: Public USENET site - Raleigh, NC


	What are the common frequencies for cordless phones???

-- 
o o ______           _     _____  _  _ o o  "But the fruit of the Spirit is
' '   /       /   / ' )   /      // // ' '   love, joy, peace, patience,
     / ______/ __/   / / / __.  // //        kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
   _/ (_) (_/_(_/_  (_(_/ (_/|_</_</         gentleness and self-control."
toddwall@rock.concert.net & todd@beretta.bacchus.org ^- Galatians 5:22-23 -^
Xref: sparky alt.radio.scanner:3651 rec.radio.shortwave:9179
From: plaws@uafhp.uark.edu (Peter Laws)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: Re: Iraqis attack Kuwait
Date: 7 Jan 1993 18:52:17 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

I watched a Pentagon briefing this am at ~1130.  During the briefing (I
missed the very beginning) CNN put a graphic on the screen of a map
showing where Iraq had attacked a Kuwaiti border post.  Evidently, this
was a mistake.  Makes you wonder...

Peter Laws|GEnie:P.LAWS1|"The '90s are gonna make the '60s|plaws@uafhp.uark.edu
n5uwy@ka5bml.ar.usa.noam| look like the '50s"  --D. Hopper|plaws@uafsysb.bitnet



Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
Subject: Re: The New Bearcat 2500XLT-D (and 8500XLT-D)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 01:01:21 GMT

mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu (Mike S.) writes:
: 
: Well, let me re-phrase that.  Did the anti-scanner law banning the 
: design of new easily-modifyable scanners go into effect yet?  Or is
: it the end of 1993?

Nope - the FCC has a year to come up with some requirements for design.
I suspect that the old designs will still be legal to manufacture and
sell - although I am not sure about that. Ones in stock certainly will
be legal to sell.

Bill
From: gerald.belton@ozonehole.com (Gerald Belton) 
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: what is wrong with my sca
Date: 5 Jan 93 11:20:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Ozone Hole - SKYDIVE New Orleans! - (504)891-3142 16,800 bps
Reply-To: gerald.belton@ozonehole.com (Gerald Belton) 

>I just received a Bearcat 855XLT for Christmas.  I like it quite a bit excep
>for one thing.  There are certain frequencies which it will pick up permanen
>static on no matter what the squelch setting is at.  When I check these
>frequencies with my 100XLT, I do not pick up any of this static.  I know tha
>this is not right and I was wondering if I am doing something wrong or if I
>should send my scanner to the company.  Any advice is appreciated.
>Please reply to:

Paul, it sounds like you are experiencing what is called a "birdie."

This is a false signal produced WITHIN your scanner by the mixing of the
internal oscillators.  All scanners have them.  If you disconnect the
antenna and the signal is still there, then it's a birdie.

---
 . SLMR 2.1 . OS/2 -- half an operating system?
                                                                                                    
----
+======================================================================+
| The Ozone Hole - SKYDIVE New Orleans! - (504) 891-3142 HST/DS 16,800 |
| 3 Nodes <> USA Today <> Boardwatch Online <> 5.2 Gigs <> 73900 Files |
+======================================================================+
From: gregs@hotcity.COM (Greg Stramback)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Police MCT Units
Date: 10 Jan 93 01:19:45 PST
Organization: BBS

In article <1993Jan7.201922.1@novax.llnl.gov>, urbina@novax.llnl.gov writes:
>In article <gregs.2jvd@hotcity.COM>, gregs@hotcity.COM (Greg Stramback)
writes:
>> 
>> i used to have the frequency, but i lost it (no reason to monitor when you
>> don't have the equipment to decode it.  it's 800MHz)  anyway, i do know
people
>
>> (2) that do monitor it, through their own specialized equipment, but i have
>> heard that it can be done using a Pakk-ratt pk232 node converter, though
don't
>
>> quote me on this, since it's only something i heard about...
>> 
>> greg
>
>
>
>
>I wonder if the Mobile Display Terminal is an electroluminescent display,
super
>twist LCD display or regular CRT. If it is a regular CRT display, it may be
>possible to pick up the screen RF via the Van Eck method. the drawback would
be
>that you would have to follow the patrol car as he/she goes about his or her
>rounds. But then again knowing Motorola, they probably would have some sort of
>TEMPEST standard or Faraday cage around the terminal.
>
>Guy
>Urbina@novax.llnl.gov
>
well, the older MDT's san jose had were CRT's, but that was long ago.  the new
ones are mostly lcd screens.

greg
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: john@anasazi.com (John R. Moore)
Subject: Re: intermod, overload, desense?
Reply-To: john@anasazi.com
Organization: Anasazi, Inc.  Phoenix, Arizona USA
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 04:26:41 GMT

Keywords: 

In article <1993Jan8.195415.18174@venus.ic.cmc.ca> pas@jupiter.ic.cmc.ca writes:
]I recently installed a Diamond D130 discone antenna
]for a friend's Pro-2006 and Bearcat BC760XLT scanners.
]After the installation was complete, we found reception
]to be much poorer with the new discone and better with
]the old metal whip antennas supplied with the scanners.
]What's really interesting is that the reception IMPROVES
]when the Pro-2006 10dB attenuator is enabled!
]
]After some thought and reading (including the ARRL 
]handbook),  I suspect the receiver front-ends are 
]suffering from something called desensitization from 
]a very strong signal from the nearby university broadcast
]band FM radio station.    I have ordered the Grove
]Scanner Filter and will try it when it arrives.   I am
]hoping it will notch out the FM transmission and solve
]the problem.    I presume that "desense" means the receiver
]front end noise floor has effectively been raised to such 
]a high level as to bury most other signals.   Is there 
]any way to confirm this?   Has anyone experienced the same?
]Comments are appreciated.    

See my previous posting. Your analysis is almost correct, and the Grove
filter will solve the problem. A 2006 will be ~30 dB MORE sensitive
in the 150MHz band with the attenuator on than off due to desense!

Desense is when an off-channel signal overloads an amplifier, which
greatly reduces its gain (by 38 dB in the case of the 200x). The
Radio Shack 2004, 2005 and 2006 have broad band filters followed
by a high gain amplifier, and as such are very prone to desense.
I actually went through several of these (trading them back to RS)
before concluding that I needed a filter to solve the problem. Later
I got hold of a schematic (the service manuals are available by
mail order) and saw the reason.


-- 
John Moore NJ7E, 7525 Clearwater Pkwy, Scottsdale, AZ 85253  (602-951-9326)
john@anasazi.com ncar!noao!asuvax!anasaz!john anasaz!john@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
 - - Support ALL of the bill of rights, INCLUDING the 2nd amendment! - -
 - - Clinton: "Read my lips: We will bring utopia, at no cost to you!" - -
From: gregs@hotcity.COM (Greg Stramback)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Info and info request on antennas
Date: 9 Jan 93 16:57:24 PST
Organization: BBS

well brett, the cellular antenna with the 3db gain is supposed to be really
good for cellular, and it works great on a friend's 200xlt that i know, for the
800 range, nothing else though.  this is expected.  for mobile use, try a MON57
mobile scanner antenna, can't remember if it's made by antenna specialist or 
who though, but it's a very good antenna, with very high gain, and they have a
new version that covers 800Mhz as well, but it has to be ordered through mail
order.  sorry, i have no information on how to get it.  i live in california
and i got my mon57 at quement electronics off of bascom avenue in san jose.
greg
Xref: sparky alt.radio.scanner:3714 rec.radio.shortwave:9412
From: seanp@undr.org (Sean Petty)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: Re: *NEW!* Uniden Bearcat 2500XLT-D
Date: 12 Jan 93 00:43:35 GMT
Reply-To: Sean Petty <undr!seanp@gvls1.GVL.Unisys.COM>
Organization: The Underground - Pennsylvania

kupiec@hp800.lasalle.edu (Bob Kupiec) writes:

> 8500XLT-D
> ---------
> Same features as the 2500XLT-D, *EXCEPT*:
> Base Unit (profile like the 760XLT)

        I wonder, does it take a PL board like the 760XLT?

> 500 Channels

        Broken up into how many banks of how many channels?
        
> Alpha Numeric Display

        How many characters?  Individually programmable?
        

Sean

---
Sean Petty                           undr!seanp@tredysvr.Tredydev.Unisys.COM
ICBMnet: 39'58'12"N 75'84'26"W       seanp@undr.org
From: mla@pilot.njin.net (Marc L. Appelbaum)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: FAQ and scanner modify doc. (which sites?)
Date: 11 Jan 93 18:13:24 GMT
Organization: NJ Intercampus Network
Cc: mla

In article <93011.100410IO91748@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> IO91748@MAINE.MAINE.EDU (Jon Carr) writes:

> In article <1993Jan9.082306.7031@news2.cis.umn.edu>, cheangk@coral.micro.umn.edu
> (Pitt) says:
> >
> >Is there a site or more than one site that carry the FAQ of this newsgroup
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> Also, if anyone has a list of 10-codes that they whould be kind enough to
> post or e-mail to me, I would apreciate it.
> 


What area do you want the 10 codes for?  I know, in NJ each county if
not each town uses different 10 codes.  In Monmouth county there is a
list of county-wide 10 codes but some town have there own variations.
For instance, a 10-15 is a MVA, but in Ocean Township there is a
10-15a (no injuries), 10-15b, (one injury), 10-15c(mutliple inj.) and
a 10-15d (doa).

So, what area do you want them for?
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
Marc L. Appelbaum, mla@pilot.njin.net 908-277-6039
From: rjd@cup.portal.com (R J Decker)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: BC200xlt battery mod: not required??
Date: Sat,  9 Jan 93 02:32:24 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: usa

Recent production versions have teh 'battery mod' already installed
by Uniden.  When I called asking about teh mod thta is what they told
me.  I didn't add the mod and my 200 works for many many hours.
The key is taht when the battery goes down, and teh display drops,
turning off, wait 5  minutes, and turning on again only gives < 1 min
additional time.  Older units which need the mod will operate a much
longer time after a slight 'rest'.
I don't know the date of manufacture of the newer units. Mine was
purchased in early spring 1992. produced ?.

rjd@cup.portal.com
Xref: sparky alt.radio.scanner:3568 alt.folklore.urban:32461
From: lasner@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Charles Lasner)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Amusing QRM story
Date: 4 Jan 93 04:30:56 GMT
Reply-To: lasner@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Charles Lasner)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <C0B1tJ.AHL@panix.com> bergman@panix.com (Mark Bergman) writes:

>        This story was reported by the AP. I trust their
>fact-checkers better than the Net fact-checkers!

Clearly another AFU motto of the weak.

cjl
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner