From: chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney)
Subject: Re: Chaney's sig
Summary: Turn out the lights, Susan's party is over. 
Organization: California State University Sacramento
Distribution: world 
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 00:43:17 GMT

Okay, folks, this is where Susan Garvin gets laid totally to waste.
Type 'n' now, if you don't want to see what happens when I catch a
pro-abort drowning in their own Sludge. 



In article <BuAoD7.FM4.2@cs.cmu.edu> garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
>
>#[misc. quotes deleted for brevity]
>
>Chaney seems not to recognize that the anti-Semitism he displays
>contradicts his claims in the next part of his .sig.  Of course,
>he doesn't seem to realize that his repeated references to "feminazis"
>and bra burning contradict his "feminist" self-description.

Okay, Susan Garvin, I'll challenge you directly and show you once and
for all how 100% WRONG you are. 

Of course it's always been well known that I could beat you in a
debate hands-down, but seeing as that you want to press it, I'll show
the newbies again.  

>##       "My logic is based on ... a religious perspective which says
>##  that personhood begins at birth (actually a month after birth if
>##  we want to be precise)..."
>##    -- Gloria Feldt,
>##       chief executive, Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona

>##   "I see nothing extreme or reprehensible about this statement."
>##     -- garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) <BtnDAw.Iwo.2@cs.cmu.edu>

Okay, Susan Garvin: Point out the anti-semitism in my .sig. 

1) Did Gloria Feldt or did she not base her LOGIC on a religious
perspective? 
2) Is there or is there not religious freedom in the First Amendment?
3) Does the 1st Am or does it not prohibit laws based on religion? 

4) Yes or no: Is it or is it not unconstitutional to base legal action
on religious principles? 
5) Yes or no: Does Gloria Feldt or does she not base her legal action
on her religious principles? 

Now, don't delete too much: Quiz: What did Gloria Feldt say her logic
is based on? 

Quiz: How would you respond to: 
"My logic is based on... a religious perspective that life begins at
conception." - Catholic priest. 

Eh? Squirming enough, Susan Garvin? 


Class over. 
This is how you put a complete and total end to a complete and total
asshole like Susan Garvin. 


=============================================================================
>##       "My logic is based on ... a religious perspective which says
>##  that personhood begins at birth (actually a month after birth if
>##  we want to be precise)..."
>##    -- Gloria Feldt,
>##       chief executive, Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona

>##   "I see nothing extreme or reprehensible about this statement."
>##     -- garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) <BtnDAw.Iwo.2@cs.cmu.edu>
=============================================================================
|Pro-Contraception   Pro-Freedom of Religion, Speech & Sexual Orientation   |
|Pro-Privacy    Pro-Humanism   Pro-Freedom of Choice 	Registered Democrat | 
|			Card-carrying member, NRLC                          |
|           Dedicated to achieving civil rights for the unborn              |
-----Steve Chaney: Founder, Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.0-------
	       The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS. 

Newsgroups: talk.abortion