HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Date: 11 Nov 1992 20:56:57 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Howard Hughes Medical Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <1drnlcINNmtn@uwm.edu> caeser@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Robert Michael Trotter) writes:
>
>	Speaking of Vikings, How about the Eagles giving up rights
>	to Cris Carter, or the Cowboys letting go of Del Rio?

The Cowboys losing Del Rio was not a big deal to them.  Remember
that they got Del Rio off the waiver wire from KC.  Sure, he 
played well for them, but he was getting up there in age and
was disgruntled about his contract negotiations that he had in
Dallas.  JJ wanted to get younger at LB and he risked protecting
some younger players at the expense of losing Del Rio.  In the
end, he's got Robert Jones playing LB and the #1 defense in the
NFL.  Jones will be around for a lot longer than Del Rio.


Ray     GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kary@col.hp.com (Dan Kary)
Subject: Re: Does anyone think Atlanta will win?
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 06:38:33 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division

krueger@cs.uwp.edu (Gerald Krueger) writes:
> Did anyone think Phoenix would win?
> 

In the r.s.f.p pool run by davewood 6 of 426 respondents picked Phoenix
in week 9.  So the aswer to your question is literally yes but virtually
no. :-)

Dan Kary
From: v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (JONNY B. GOODE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Pitt #1 - NOT
Date: 10 Nov 92 15:24:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <8ezct=m00WDKQ8WrAU@andrew.cmu.edu>, vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu (Vernon H Harmon) writes...
>Excerpts from netnews.rec.sport.football.pro: 9-Nov-92 Pitt #1 - NOT
>Ronald Fedkiw@crenshaw.m (1472)
> 
>> [lots of moronic Buffalo barking deleted...]
> 
>> Ron Fedkiw (rfedkiw@joshua.math.ucla.edu)
> 
>> A plan is made by someone who is sitting and thinking ...
>> while others are doing.
> 
> 
>all I can say is I hope the Fish beat the shit out the Chips next week....
>just for you....!
> 
>--Vernon.

	Ahh the prattlings of yet another frustrated anti-Bills person. Vernon,
please try and make some semblance of intelligence in your next post.
	
Thank you for your support!

Jon
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mcmillen@thepond.ssd.kodak.com (Philip McMillen)
Subject: Re: Teams with anemic offence and Super Defence
Organization: Eastman Kodak
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 15:49:32 GMT

In article <4NOV92.23361245@vax.clarku.edu> htilney@vax.clarku.edu writes:
>>	The Steeler defense is not the same as the Viking
>>	defense, the Vikes are better. Offense's are about the same,
>>	with the Steelers having a bit better running game, but the Vikes
>>	having a bit better passing game. Bottom line IMHO, is the Steelers
>>	are not better than the Vikings.
>
>No team has given up fewer points than Pittsburgh. I would agree that 
>Minnesota's defensive line is more intimidating, but the Steeler secondary
>is second to nobody.
>
>Bart
>

Hard to understand where the Steelers have the best secondary, when
the Vikings have the #1 Pass Defense in the entire NFL!!!

Check the stats.

Phil McMillen    "The Purple People Eaters are back!!!"
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Top 12 in total yards from scrimmage
Date: 12 Nov 1992 23:34:54 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <BILLMS.92Nov12103616@gip.eecs.umich.edu> billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>   2) Who thought of this: Packers
>
>I love to watch Sterling play, and he kills my team (well, at least once
>recently).  Workman should give half his salary to Holmgren for comming to
>TB, putting Favre into the qb slot, and giving him a chance.  I guess the
>other half should go to DT for getting injured.  What do the Pack fans think
>of Vince?  I've got the impression that a lot of backs could do what he has
>done in the same situation, but I haven't seen him play much.  In any case,
>they sure are getting a lot of quiet production from the guy.
>
   I've thought that Workman should've been starting for a couple years now.
   He's got better hands and is a better blocker than Thompson. DT can run
   okay if there's an opening (and who can't----are you reading this Herschel)
   but Workman can occassionally look for and find holes. Workman is simply
   a good, but not great, all-around back.

   Sharpe is the best receiver in the league this year. He's always double-
   covered, but almost always open. Rice isn't having a great season, although
   I'd still call him the best to ever play WR. Of course Rison and Irvin
   are both excellent also.

   --salty
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Dallas vs. Detroit
Date: 5 Nov 92 19:07:54 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

Hi,

Last year Detroit beat Dallas twice: once in the regular season and the
second time during the playoffs when Eric Kramer had a monster day. I
would like to know Dallas fans' thoughts on the Sunday game. Can their
D handle a run and shoot offense?? Dallas is starting to look like contenders
and Detroits off to a really bad season... still I think it'll be really
close.

satish nair
go giants
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jarvinba@ntmtv.UUCP (Brad Jarvinen)
Subject: Re: Seahawk fan
Originator: jarvinba@altair
Reply-To: jarvinba@ntmtv.UUCP (Brad Jarvinen)
Organization: Northern Telecom Inc, Mountain View, CA
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 00:56:35 GMT

Add one more slightly depressed but ever hopeful 'Hawks
fan to the growing list (who else out there wishes Krieg
was back?)

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: tech@maitland.cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini)
Subject: Fins vs colts
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 18:15:15 GMT

In article <3747@ceylon.gte.com> chf0@roger.gte.com (Curtis Fennell) writes:
 
>Today's question for DolFans to ponder is:  Why not start Humphrey in
>the backfield with Paige?  Then the Dolphins could run Humphrey behind
>Paige for the power runs, or they could throw to Humphrey or Paige out
>of the backfield. 
>

Over 150 all purpose yards, 107 of which were rushing. Higgs looked
great. Granted, Humphrey looked good as well but I still think the job
is Higgs' to lose. I think Higgs has answered his critics. 

How the Fins can look so good one day and so miserable the next is
beyond me, but I'm willing to overlook the bad days if the good ones
are going to be as good as Sunday. 

Of course this was just a warmup for the big, Big, BIG, game Monday
night. It doesn't seem as much fun this time due to all the shit being
shoveled in this group but I`m hoping a rational flo fan might be
persuaded to engage in a little friendly stabbing and twisting. Doug
you out there?

Tony (go buffalo) Travaglini 
tech@cs.ucf.edu
From: mdh@mlb.semi.harris.com (Mark Hanson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Phoenix QB situation.
Date: 5 Nov 92 20:49:32 GMT
Reply-To: mdh@mlb.semi.harris.com (Mark Hanson)
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne, Fl.

What is the Phoenix QB situation.
Chandler seems to be doing a pretty good job.
Rosenbach appears to be healthy since he came in for Chandler
a couple of games ago when Chandler got knocked out.
However, Chandler was still the starter last week.
Will Bugel stick with Chandler until he screws up???
Will he switch to Rosenbach when he feels he is ready to return???
Who will be starting this week (11/8/92)???

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Hanson
Go Gators, Go Bills
============================================================================
Harris Semiconductor             Internet:   mdh@mlb.semi.harris.com
PO Box 883 MS 62B-022            Work Phone: (407) 724-7572
Melbourne, Fla. 32902
From: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM (Bennet Ih - Sun BOS Hardware - Sunergy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Date: 6 Nov 92 00:10:33 GMT
Reply-To: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc. - BDC
NNTP-Posting-Host: mowgli.east.sun.com

> I personally fear for Emmitt... he may be carrying the ball far too many more
> times than he would like to.  One would hate to see him go the way of Earl
> Cambell or Chuck Foreman.

No kidding; he seemed pretty dazed after his 30-some carry game vs the Eagles.
Even though he had a great game he took some pounding. Don't know how much
of that anyone could take, no matter how tough you are.

-Bennet
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rajesh@unlv.edu (Rajesh Viswanathan)
Subject: Browns Suck Hard? News to me
Organization: UNLV
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 01:36:36 GMT

Not to woof too loud but ... way to go Browns!! I'm sure the game was 
dedicated to Warren Moon's comments to ESPN about having the Cleveland
Browns number (guess it must have been the wrong one, eh Warren?).

Go Browns


-- 
Rajesh
:: I hope if dogs ever take over the world, and they chose a king, they     ::
:: don't just go by size, because I bet there are some Chihuahuas with some ::
:: good ideas.								    ::
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett)
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Organization: Abode Computer Systems
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 15:11:18 GMT

In article <BILLMS.92Nov9145443@gip.eecs.umich.edu> billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>
>Agreed.  Emmitt is king stud #1, most importantly because he does it behind
>such a low quality OL.

I think the Cowboy OL is a lot better now than it has been the last couple
of years. Just look at how few sackes they have given up this year over last.
They aren't as bad as people would like to think they are. They held up pretty
good to the Eagles defense a couple of weeks ago.

I think they have been more consisten than incosistent.

Eric



-- 

		Internet: eric@abode.ttank.com
		    uucp: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!wvus!abode!eric

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rrogers@watson.ibm.com (Ryan Rogers)
Subject: Re: Cowboy Bandwagon
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 14:59:32 GMT
Distribution: usa
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.14m by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: rrogers@watson.ibm.com (Ryan Rogers)
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In <1992Nov4.155402.39@kirk.msoe.edu> wesloskij@kirk.msoe.edu writes:
>       Is it just me or is everyone else sick of all these "fair-
>weather" fans jumping on the Cowboy bandwagon.  Dallas has not dominated
>the NFC east by any means and they still have a long way to go.  The way
>I see it, is that this trend is pretty much like our most current
>presidential election, everybody likes the favorite, but nobody really
>knows why.  "It's time for a change" in the NFL and it's not simply to
>become a Cowboy fan for no reason other than they're finally out of the
>basement.  Let's face reality, they are very overrated and will choke
>come playoff time!!
>
>               Go Jim McMahon and the Eagles!!!
>
>--John--
>

   This is my first post to this group (I'm a fairly new reader, so
 bear with me).

   I've been a Cowboy fan for 12+ years, however; even I don't want
 to get too over-confident with their performance this season.  Sure,
 I'm happy as hell to see their improvements over the past couple
 seasons, however;  I think they need to lose at least a game or two
 more before playoffs.  There's nothing worse than over-confidence.

   I don't see them getting stomped by anyone, however; a loss or
 two will do them a world of good.


Sincerely,
Ryan Rogers
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.pro:23226 rec.sport.football.college:18983
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Crazy & Fake Plays
Date: 9 Nov 1992 18:01:54 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

All this talk about crazy plays made me think of one of the best I've ever
seen. About 10 years ago, Wisconsin was down by about 5 to Illinois with about
a minute to go. On a third (or fourth) and long, QB Randy Wright stepped back
and threw a pass towards Al Toon if memory serves me correctly. Toon caught
the ball on a short hop and fired a long TD pass to a wide-open Badger
receiver. The throw to Toon was a lateral, but when it bounced, the Illinois
players just kind of stopped thinking it was an incomplete pass. Although it
would have to be tough to complete a short-hop lateral pass, that play has to
be one of the best trick plays I've ever seen. 

On a side note, Illinois naturally came back to win the game. A famous ILL QB
(maybe Tony Eason) marched the Illini down the field in about 30 seconds and
the Illini kicker booted a 49-yarder, his fifth of the day, as time ran out
to beat the Badgers. Typical.

--salty
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
From: bsutesch@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu
Date: 11 Nov 92 15:24:56 CST
Organization: Wichita State University, Wichita, Ks

In article <BILLMS.92Nov9145443@gip.eecs.umich.edu>, billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
> In article <92314.125028JJS158@psuvm.psu.edu> JJ Serowik <JJS158@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> 
>    Seems to me that Emmitt is Without a Doubt, the best RB in the league!
>    Seems to me, he singlehandedly(Sp?) whupped the Eagles D into a Coma by
>    continually pounding them in the head! Seems to me, anyone who gains 163 yards
>    agains a stingy Defense like the Eagles deserves it!  How many yards did Foster
>    have that week?  And who were they playing?  Doesn't sound to me like Emmitt
>    has any competition!  Thanx for the future flames:)
> 
> Agreed.  Emmitt is king stud #1, most importantly because he does it behind
> such a low quality OL.
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yeah, right.

Brian
From: cbcs3440@Oswego.EDU (Kevin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: When will the Bears give Lewis the RB job?
Summary: Anderson IS benched!
Date: 12 Nov 92 17:36:17 GMT
Reply-To: cbcs3440@oswego.Oswego.EDU (Kevin Mundstock)
Organization: Instructional Computing Center, SUNY at Oswego, Oswego, NY

In article <1992Nov10.230326.23357@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com> robertd@ecs.comm.mot.com (Robert Day) writes:
>In <1doqdsINN5ps@matt.ksu.ksu.edu>, mgriffin@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Mark Griffin) writes
>
>Well, after that Sunday night joke, Ditka mentioned that it's time
>to start shaking up some personnel. Specifically, he was talking
>about cornerbacks (see ya Lemonhead), but hopefully he'll go that 
>extra step and put Anderson on the bench (where he belongs).
                    ^^^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^^^
On ESPN, I heard that Anderson is being benched, along with Mark Carrier.

					Kevin
From: wisp@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Wisp)
Subject: Re: GOD WILL GO 19-0 AND WIN THE SUPER BOWL!!!
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 09:32:51 GMT

In article <1992Nov7.134403.14188@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> logan@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Richard Scott) writes:

[stuff...]

>AussieVamp
>AussieMan, Neophyte Vampire and DarkWolf
>(Eric Clapton is God!!!)   [ and there is Bobby Fischer... ;-) ]
>(Walter Payton, Mike Singletary and Neal Anderson form the Holy Trinity!)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

No prizes for guessing where Ditka comes in...

The Wisp. [Was that three 'b's or four...]
From: nahst6+@pitt.edu (Nathan A Horstman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: *** VOTE ***  Hear ye, hear ye!
Date: 11 Nov 92 00:55:38 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
WHAT:  ELECTION

WHAT FOR:  The top BUSTS and top STEALS in the NFL draft in recent years.

RULES:  1)  Only 3 votes for BUSTS and 3 votes for STEALS maximum.

        2)  Limit draft picks to 1980-->1992 only.  SORRY OLD-TIMERS!

        3)  E-mail only....no posts!

        4)  Reply by Friday, November 20th.  

Results will be tabulated and posted Saturday, November 21st.  
See you at the polls!

Nathan
A
nahst6+@pitt.edu

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: 6405750@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Subject: Re: Rams
Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 15:00:26 GMT

------------------------- Original Article -------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
the falcons game.they are an improving young d/team.the last to games
were against the niners then the saints and we lost both games by three
points each in the closing seconds of each game.we're improving each week
drew




From: mcclure@ucis.vill.edu (MCCLURE HAROLD)
Subject: Rams
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1
Organization: Villanova University
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 17:54:00 GMT

Jonathan Saari builds a decent case for the LA Rams being the most improved
team. His list of wins (the two NY teams and the Pats) is not all that surpr-
ising, but their losses may actually say more for all well they are playing.
The only game I saw was against my favorite team AKA the Falcons. In the early
going, the Falcons offense owned the Rams defense, which is not really that
surprising...the RED GUN has walked over the Bears defense as well as the
Dolphins (and of course, the Jets). The Falcons defense was doing well and I
was heard to say, "yea, we'd better beat THIS team if we have ANY chance".

AND then Everitt and company went to work and Mr. Saari is right. The Falcons
were lucky to win in the end. Is the Rams offense that good or is the Falcons
defense that bad? Also, how has the Rams defense stacked up in other games?

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: Lions Stats Wk 10 (THESE ARE STATS??)
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: University of Michigan
	<BILLMS.92Nov10103445@gip.eecs.umich.edu>
	<yang-101192105739@comm-mac-ii.acs.ucalgary.ca>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 19:25:01 GMT

In article <yang-101192105739@comm-mac-ii.acs.ucalgary.ca> yang@acs.ucalgary.ca (David Yang) writes:

   I thought I heard Madden/Summerall mention that Andre was inactive and the
   only way he could play was if both QB's went down. Also, if he went in,
   none of the starting quarterbacks could come back in. 

That makes sence.  I had the volume down, and was just watching the picture
while reading something else.  Thanks.

In any case, now that the season is officially over, I think they should not
have Andre set inactive.

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: grundusk@sunflare.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Kevin Grunduski)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Date: 9 Nov 92 16:48:23 GMT
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center

In article <8{#@byu.edu>, rosej@utah.et.byu.edu (James Rose) writes:
|> 
|> v130pwbq@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
|> >I was wondering if anyone knows who the last man to rush for
|> >2,000 yards was?
|> 
|> Last man?  How about ONLY man.  Eric Dickersons' record stands at 2005 yards.
|> 
|> 			James
|> 
What about O.J. ? Does 2,003 ring a bell ? Dickerson had 2105 I believe.

KG
From: rhoads@riches.rutgers.edu (Glenn Rhoads)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rushers and a little more (top ten single season)
Summary: correction
Keywords: 2000 rushing
Date: 13 Nov 92 03:09:42 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Cc: rhoads

> >                        SINGLE-SEASON RUSHING LEADERS
> >
> >            Player           Team      year  att.  yards   avg
> >      ------------------ ------------ ------ ----- ------ -----
> > 1    Eric Dickerson     LA Rams       1984   379   2105   5.6
> > 2    O.J. Simpson       Buffalo       1973   332   2003   6.0
> > 3    Earl Campbell      Houston       1980   373   1934   5.2
> > 4    Jim Brown          Cleveland     1963   291   1883   6.5
> > 5    Walter Payton      Chicago       1977   339   1852   5.5
> > 6    Eric Dickerson     LA Rams       1986   404   1821   4.5
> > 7    O.J. Simpson       Buffalo       1975   329   1817   5.5
> > 8    Eric Dickerson     LA Rams       1983   390   1808   4.6
> > 9    Marcus Allen       LA Raiders    1985   390   1759   4.5
> >10    Gerald Riggs       Atlanta       1985   397   1719   4.3
> 
> Stats like this make me wonder how anyone could seriously question Jim
> Brown as being the best back to ever play the game.  The man gained his
> 1883 in a 12 game season.  No one else on this list has as good a per game
> average as Brown did, nor the per carry average he maintained.

NOT TRUE!  Jim Brown gained his 1863 yards (not 1883) in a 14 game
season not in a 12 game season.  This seems to be a common
misconception.  While the NFL did have a 12 game season when Jim Brown
entered the league, the NFL had already switched to a 14 game season
by 1963 (I don't know the exact year the NFL switched to a 14 game
season).  With this correction we see that the highest per game
average over an entire season was set by O.J. Simpson not Jim Brown,
though Brown did have a higher per carry average.

As for seriously questioning whether Jim Brown was the best back ever,
some other choices are indeed defensible.  In addition to statistics,
we also have to consider that football is a TEAM sport and that there
are differences between different eras.  Since football is a team
sport, we have to consider the supporting cast; who played for a
better team, who had better blockers, etc.  When comparing players
from different eras we have to consider that they played under
different sets of rules, that modern players are full-time athletes
while in previous eras football was something that people did after
earning a living at another job, etc.

Actually, I agree that Jim Brown is the best running back ever.  It's
just that you are never going to be able to demonstrate it using
statistics.  Instead, who is the best remains a judgement call.

-- Glenn Rhoads
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chico@athena.mit.edu (Thomas A Weston)
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 14:27:28 GMT

In article <8{#@byu.edu>, rosej@utah.et.byu.edu (James Rose) writes:
|> 
|> v130pwbq@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
|> >I was wondering if anyone knows who the last man to rush for
|> >2,000 yards was?
|> 
|> Last man?  How about ONLY man.  Eric Dickersons' record stands at 2005 yards.
|> 
|> 			James
|> 
No, OJ made it first.  And Dickerson got to 2100 something.  I'm pretty sure
that there have been 6 people in US college/pro football to break 2000.  OJ
and Dickerson in the NFL, Walker in the USFL, and Allen, Rozier and Sanders in
college.  Please let me know if I'm wrong on one of these, or if I missed
someone.