HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Thu, 7 Jan 1993 07:29:42 -0700
From:         Tom Maes <tmaes@VNET3.VUB.AC.BE>
Subject:      Amiga rumours

Here's an interesting file for all those rumour lovers out there...
I downloaded it this morning from a local BBS.
Well, it sure looks like the Amiga's future is brighter than ever!

-----Original message starts here

TO : ALL CODERS IN THE AMIGA DEMO-/GAMESCENE !!!

New Low- Highend Chipset
========================

As we heard from serious Commodore developers, there
will be a new Low-end and a High-end chipset.
The High-end chipset will feature totally new customchips.
They will bring 16 Bit Sound and some other new features.
There will be no DSP (Digital Signal Processor) like
the MOTOROLA 68851 in this AMIGA. Instead of it, there
will take a new Commodore own Signal Processor part in this
wonderful machine.
The new chips are not fully compatible to AA Chips. Most of
the new AA Registers like $dff106 and $dff10c will be changed.
That's the reason, why Commodore didn't released a new
A1200 and A4000 Hardware Reference Manual.
The old Registers won't be changed.
Consequence: If Coders use the old (Normal & ECS) registers,
that are documented from Commodore, there are no probs with
the High-end chips. But if they use AA Registers, the new
AMIGA will propably CRASH.

Probably publishing date of this AMIGA: Summer '93 (August).

Other facts:- The consumer price of the A4000 will turn under
             $1200 in 1993!
            - Kickstart 4.0 is finished!

The truth of this facts is nearly 100 %.

Text from SMC of ABYSS
{written on 30.12.92}

-----End of Message

I think especially the A4000 price is good news for all of us!
Hmm, I'm not sure about my A4000 dreams anymore. Maybe I'll wait
for the new wonder machine...
Oh yes, of course this news should be taken with a grain of salt ;-)

-=  Tom Maes                      "Reality is no obstacle!"
-=  tmaes@vnet3.vub.ac.be
-=  Free University of Brussels
-=  Belgium - Europe
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Organization: University of Wisconsin--Platteville
X-Envelope-to: I-AMIGA@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"I-AMIGA@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu"
X-VMS-Cc: 96720919
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:07:00 CST
From:         Lance Tagliapietra <96720919@UCS.UWPLATT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Problem with 2 hard drives

>Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 09:37:00 CST
>From: Lance Tagliapietra <96720919@ucs.uwplatt.edu>
>Subject: Problem with 2 hard drives
>
>Hi,
>
[...]
>Both drives seem to work fine individually, but I can seems to get
>them to work nice together.  The problem is most apparent when copying
>files greater than 200K from the quantum to the fujitsu.  The SCSI bus
>will apparently lock up.  All disk activity stops and the drive light
>stays on.
[...]

The solution to the problem was that the controller was using 6.1 roms.
A borrowed controller with the 6.6 roms cleared up all the problems.

A big thanks to all who replied.

>
>-Lance
> ---------------- Amiga - The Wild Side of Power Computing -----------------
> Lance Tagliapietra                       Internet: 96720919@ucs.uwplatt.edu
> P.O. Box 26                                BitNet: 96720919@uwplatt
> Platteville, WI 53818


-Lance
 ---------------- Amiga - The Wild Side of Power Computing -----------------
 Lance Tagliapietra                       Internet: 96720919@ucs.uwplatt.edu
 P.O. Box 26                                BitNet: 96720919@uwplatt
 Platteville, WI 53818
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 03:54:00 EST
From:         CPTRCLAS <E3344010@APOLLO.MONTCLAIR.EDU>
Subject:      AGA compatibility

        Is Final Copy II and CanDO 2.0 AGA Compatibile????

Johnny
E3344010@apollo.montclair.edu
From: halightw@thunder.LakeheadU.Ca (HAL)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Subject: Re: Re[2]: DeepSpace9
Date: 7 Jan 1993 21:47:22 GMT
Organization: Lakehead University; Thunder Bay, Ont

bbowles@IUS.INDIANA.EDU (BBOWLES) writes:


>          Mindless violence and sex huh?  <Set Flame on> Finally a
>          Star Wars type series.  I like Trek, been watching it since
>          1967, but I find the action most of the time lacking.  I

  What kind of action are you talking about?  The violence or the sex? THe
action (battle type stuff), is rare, but I find it very good when they      
actually do have a battle.   The Wolf359 battle shown in DS9 was really
cool!!  
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Thu, 7 Jan 1993 10:54:59 -0600
From:         flasar@WUGCRC.WUSTL.EDU
Subject:      RE: Tape drive

Dan Roman sez:
>In the latest Amigaworld (which I just got in the mail yesterday) there
>is an ad by Software Hut for the Commodore A3070 150 MB tape drive
>(originally sold by Commodore for use with A3000 UNIX systems) for an
>unbelievable price of $349.  Sounds too good to be true but just thought
>I would relay the info to those on the list that might be interested in
>a SCSI tape drive.  It says the original list price was $1095.  I have
                                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>no idea how good Software Hut is but that price is pretty good and they
>are supposedly brand new.  If I did not have a tape drive already I'd
>probably buy one of these.
>--
>_________
>Dan Roman  GEnie: D.ROMAN1  Internet: roman@tix.timeplex.com  //
>Ascom Timeplex (NJ)  Homebrew is better brew!  Only AMIGA!  \X/

    Can anyone tell me why tape drives on the Amiga are so much more expensive
than drives for the peecee?  I have a 486DX clone, for which I was able to
put in a 250 MGb (compressed) tape backup unit for $199.00.  I have an A2000
(which keeps me sane after cursing Windows all day), and I can't get anything
but a SCSI drive.  It seems to me that this is an unnecessary expense.  Can
anyone enlighten me on this?  I'd really like to have a good backup unit.
As it stands, the best means of backup would be a SyQuest drive, since the
expense of the tape drive means it would be limited to backups, being a linear
access media, while a Syquest is random access.
    Dan Flasar
    Washington u School of Medicine
    St. Louis, MO
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
From: jmpierce@whale.st.usm.edu (Jimmy Malcolm Pierce)
Subject: Re: Re[4]: DeepSpace9
Organization: University of Southern Mississippi
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 14:19:39 GMT

In article <930111221058.20207334@ECSUC.CTSTATEU.EDU> CAMACHO@ECSUC.CTSTATEU.EDU writes:
>Ok, I like to hear about DS9, and B5 just as much as anyone... BUT
>This list is dedicated to Amiga... Let's move firther talk to a Star Trek
>list serve....
>
>Carlos

  I got interested in this discussion when I found out that Amigas were
being used to make some of the graphics on those programs... DJ.

-- 
         Jim Pierce Bach. of Sci. in Applied Computer Science USM 
             jmpierce@whale.st.usm.edu  Disclaimer: Standard.
                      Video. Peter Gabriel: Steam
From: crystal@glia.biostr.washington.edu (Crystal)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Subject: Re: Killer Cracker.
Date: 5 Jan 93 20:46:47 GMT
Organization: University of Washington
NNTP-Posting-Host: glia.biostr.washington.edu

In <I-AMIGA%93010509325432@RUTVM1.RUTGERS.EDU> AVERHE@BANRUC60.BITNET writes:

>Hi,

> I wanted to know if anyone has a new version of Killer Cracker (kc).
> I downloaded it once from a bbs  (kc200.lzh).
> It's a program which finds unix-passwds, I find it very useful ...


	USEFUL FOR >>>WHAT<<<< ????


(this sounds rather ominously like a program that can be used to access the
accounts of others on the internet...)

> I have v.2, 68000, 030 and 040 version, and the 68000 version of v.7
> If anyone has the 68020/30 version of v.7, or a later version, please
> contact me.

>     Regards,

>           Aeneas.
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>|   Aeneas Verhe           |  averhe@banruc60.bitnet  <- private messages   |
>|   Student economy        |                    only, no large files !!!    |
>|   RUCA - University      |   amiga@banruc60.bitnet  <- no quota on mail   |
>|   of Antwerp, Belgium    |                        so larger files allowed |
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: I-AMIGA@RUTVM1.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"I-AMIGA@RUTVM1.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Mon, 4 Jan 1993 16:09:00 EDT
From:         GADGET <SHALEY@ALBION.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Games and Amiga

Actually, I had a similar problem with Awesome.  If you sent in your warranty
registration when you got the game, or if you still have the card, you
can get a backup copy of all three disks for only 7 dollars American.  It
took about 2 weeks for me to get mine.  If didn't register, or don't have
the card, I would suggest calling.  (It is my understanding that Psygnosis
has this policy with all of their games.)

As far as I know there is no way of breaking any of the Psygnosis games.
A friend of mine used a program on his IBM to determine the format of the
disk, and found that all but one sector were formatted IBM.  Then he tried
to have his drive make a verbatim copy (his drive would cache the information
obtained from disk and write it back with no intervention by the compter) and
it still would not work.  So I'm sorry to say that I can't help you there.

                                        laterdays,
                                        SLH.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 13:31:07 EDT
From:         "Breno A. Silva" <ALUNOINF@BRUFSE.BITNET>
Subject:      AWorld X Amiga

Just a quick point here:
Aren't you tired of hearing Amiga World say that our computer can't
stand against I*Ms and M*Cs? 'This software is good for what we've
seen of Amiga software', 'This one is 30000 times worse than PageMaker',
'This one is 3000000000 times worse than Excel for Windows'.
Most of the times our softwares are even better, but this simply isn't
assumed just because neither Aldus nor Microsoft released it.
THIS IS A SHAME!
If a potential computer user wants to know about Amigas and see if it's
worth their money, what do they go for? AmigaWorld. And what do they
find there? In capital letters? YOU'D BETTER BUY AN MS-DOS MACHINE!
Come on... And use WINSLOWS and other awkward stuff that takes painfull
seconds just to update the page? I refuse to, but our great advantages
over other machines aren't pointed out. Oppinions, please?


/B.A.S. - Alunoinf@BRUFSE
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
From: jmpierce@whale.st.usm.edu (Jimmy Malcolm Pierce)
Subject: Re: Games and Amiga
Organization: University of Southern Mississippi
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 17:26:22 GMT

>On somewhat of an off subject... I played with the demo of Street Fighter II,
>and I must say that I am somewhat dissappointed. It looks like they used 32
>colors only... Why didn't they use 64 colors... The graphics look real
>cheap... And they didn't even use parallax scrolling for the ground.. What
>do you Europeans think? Is it a bad conversion.. Or should I just wait
>for a AGA version?
>
> Carlos

  Many Amiga games look like crap because they are simply ms***s cross-overs.
 They aren't written to take advantage of the Amiga's capabilities. And 
 some games are written for the Amiga, instead of simply porting the code.
 Fewer colors means, usually, a faster screen refresh... But since I have
 never actually written an Amiga program... JimP. aka DJ.
  
-- 
         Jim Pierce Bach. of Sci. in Applied Computer Science USM 
             jmpierce@whale.st.usm.edu  Disclaimer: Standard.
                   Video. Cher: Love and Understanding.
          'Rush Limbaugh is the 'Chia Pet' of TV talk shows !'
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Sun, 10 Jan 1993 18:09:24 -0700
From:         Stephen Vermeulen <SVermeulen@RAGNAROK.CUC.AB.CA>
Subject:      Re: Tape drive

:>         In the latest Amigaworld (which I just got in the mail yesterday)
: there
:>         is an ad by Software Hut for the Commodore A3070 150 MB tape drive
:>         (originally sold by Commodore for use with A3000 UNIX systems) for an
:>         unbelievable price of $349.  Sounds too good to be true but just
: thought
:>         I would relay the info to those on the list that might be interested
: in
:>         a SCSI tape drive.  It says the original list price was $1095.  I
 have
:>         no idea how good Software Hut is but that price is pretty good and
: they
:>         are supposedly brand new.  If I did not have a tape drive already I'd
:>         probably buy one of these.
:>
:> I purchased one when the ad first appeared two months ago and have
:> been one happy tape-backup-user. It is terrific with AmiBack.
:>
:
:I suppose I'm asking too much for one of these babies to read from SUN 150MB
:tape drives too?
:
:Now that would be fun...
:
:Cheers,                                                            __o
:Rick                                                               \<,

nope you are not asking too much at all -- since they both are QIC
it will work, you need to use TAR and the BTN tape-handler on the
Amiga end and TAR on the SUN end.  I did this a few times with my
WT-150 (a 150meg QIC cartridge drive sold by GVP) and do it quite
frequently with my Exabyte drive.

Regards
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Stephen Vermeulen                  svermeulen@ragnarok.cuc.ab.ca
    1206-3500 Varsity Dr. N.W.      uunet.uu.net!ragnarok!svermeulen
    Calgary, Alta. Canada                      Voice: (403) 282-7990
    BIX: svermeulen            VBBS: (403) 284-2048 + (403) 284-5625
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 14:19:00 LCL
From:         Michael Zacherle <UB3G@DKAUNI2.BITNET>
Subject:      parnet question

Hello everyone,

last week I took a look to the sources of parnet.
There was a line like "Look to the station number to see if message
is for me..." or something like that and there was a line that this
number should be from 1 to 255.
Does that mean that I can connect more than 2 Amigas via parnet?
Of course I would need some logical connections, e.g:
To have 1 Server and 2 Nodes I would need
mount NET1:
mount NET2:  on the Server
and
mount NET:   on each of the Nodes (of course with modified mountlists).
Is that true?
Hey, that would mean I can connect my A1000, my A2000 and a CDTV
for the costs of nearly nothing! GREAT !!!!!    :')
Any answeres would help me.

Thanks in advance

Michael Zacherle
  Ub3G@DKAUNI2
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Tue, 5 Jan 1993 16:50:30 EDT
From:         Omar Colocci <ALUNOINF@BRUFSE.BITNET>
Subject:      External keyboard adaptor for A500

Hi friends,
I've been owned an A500 for about 2 years, and I'm tired of listen to ppl
saying 'Hey! Nice computer! It's as cute as a child toy...' or 'It works
fine...but my NES looks more professional than this! hahaha...'.

Now I'm intending in buying a tower case to put my A500 board in, but there's
a little problem...the keyboard! I've heard about an keyboard adaptor to
use AT keyboards with an Amiga, but I think it only works in a 2000/3000...
Can anybody help me with that? I wanna know any method to use an external
keyboard with my 500.

Thanx in advance!

                                Omar Silas Colocci
                              ALUNOINF@BRUFSE.BITNET

*****************************************************************************
*   THE BEST PC IS A CRASHED ONE !!!!!  AMIGA RULES THE WORLD FOREVER !!!!  *
*****************************************************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Vmsmail-To: SMTP%"I-AMIGA@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Tue, 5 Jan 1993 11:12:52 -0500
From:         CAMACHO@ECSUC.CTSTATEU.EDU
Subject:      RE: Printing problems with 2.04

Not sure... but doesn't that printer emulate an IBM proprinter and
an Epson? Try setting it to one of those printers and changing your
printer driver..

Carlos
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Vmsmail-To: SMTP%"I-AMIGA@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Tue, 5 Jan 1993 11:11:04 -0500
From:         CAMACHO@ECSUC.CTSTATEU.EDU
Subject:      Re: Games and Amiga

On somewhat of an off subject... I played with the demo of Street Fighter II,
and I must say that I am somewhat dissappointed. It looks like they used 32
colors only... Why didn't they use 64 colors... The graphics look real
cheap... And they didn't even use parallax scrolling for the ground.. What
do you Europeans think? Is it a bad conversion.. Or should I just wait
for a AGA version?

 Carlos
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
From: jmpierce@whale.st.usm.edu (Jimmy Malcolm Pierce)
Subject: Re: RKM
Organization: University of Southern Mississippi
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 08:11:41 GMT

   Hi Dan,

 dsr@lns598.tn.cornell.edu (Daniel S. Riley) writes:
>Oh foo.
>
>jmpierce@whale.st.usm.edu (Jimmy Malcolm Pierce) writes:
>>  From discussions on comp.sys.amiga.*, the AGA chips are only going to
>> work on the AGA Amiga machines.
>
>Mostly true, although there's still some debate over how much hacking
>it would take to make AGA sortof-work in an A3000.

    If its on the comp.sys.amiga.hardware group, I have no time to read it.
  I've been reading comp.sys.amiga.misc and *.introduction only.

>> No earlier machine will be able to go beyond wb 2.1.
>
>Completely wrong--you are confusing hardware and software.  3.0 does
>*not* require AGA, and 4.0 certainly won't.  Whether there will ever
>be a 3.x release for non-AGA machines is a marketing decision, but
>there d*mn well better be a 4.x release for the entire line (excepting
>the A1000, of course...).

   Hmm. As usual I meant both rom and softeware and didn't say it that way.
I would put 3.0 on a machine only if all capabilities were available.
Actually I have been trying to ignore the furor
on comp.sys.amiga.misc as I have little time to read it.

>Picky point--the A600 is not an AGA machine.

     Hmm. I was given wrong info then...

>Back on the original question, there is usually a significant lag
>between the release of a new OS version and production of the
>corresponding RKMs.  So you're probably best off buying the 2.04
>RKMs, and then buying the 3.0 native developer update whenever it
>becomes generally available.
>
>-- 
>-Dan Riley                          Internet: dsr@lns598.tn.cornell.edu
>-Wilson Lab, Cornell University     HEPNET/SPAN: lns598::dsr (44630::dsr)
>	      "Distance means nothing/To me." -Kate Bush

  Thanks Dan and others for setting the record straight, DJ.

-- 
         Jim Pierce Bach. of Sci. in Applied Computer Science USM 
             jmpierce@whale.st.usm.edu  Disclaimer: Standard.
                   Video. Cher: Love and Understanding.
          'Rush Limbaugh is the 'Chia Pet' of TV talk shows !'
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Mon, 11 Jan 1993 07:31:00 PST
From:         "26637::BRZWICKY" <BRZWICKY%26637.decnet@CONSRT.ROCKWELL.COM>
Subject:      Re: AA Animation Speed

> I have doubts about anything I read till I see it myself.......Here is a
> challange to anyone out there with a 1200 or 4000 and a VCR(NTSC). Create
> a 30 frame anim in DPaint (HAM8,Hires, interlace, and overscan). Each frame
> numbered 1-30 and airbrush sqiggles painted out to the corners of each frame
> (to make a FULL frame anim). Record a few minutes of the looping animation
> to tape (VHS is fine) and send it to me. I'll take the tape and transfer
> it with burned in SMPTE time code and check to see how close to 30 frames
> per sec is possible.
>
> Ed :-{

All that isn't necessary!  Just make an anim, put a spot somewhere special
on the first frame or two, and verify that the spot appears twice per
second.  (Make it a 25-fram anim if you're in PAL.)


|\      / Bill Zwicky                       / Anything you can do
|<      / Insight Industries, Inc.          / my Amiga can do better!
|/itman / BRZWICKY%26637.decnet@consrt.rockwell.com
From: dsr@lns598.tn.cornell.edu (Daniel S. Riley)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Subject: Re: RKM
Date: 9 Jan 1993 12:22:38 -0500
Organization: Wilson Lab, Cornell U., Ithaca, NY  14853
NNTP-Posting-Host: lns596.tn.cornell.edu

Oh foo.

jmpierce@whale.st.usm.edu (Jimmy Malcolm Pierce) writes:
>  From discussions on comp.sys.amiga.*, the AGA chips are only going to
> work on the AGA Amiga machines.

Mostly true, although there's still some debate over how much hacking
it would take to make AGA sortof-work in an A3000.

> No earlier machine will be able to go beyond wb 2.1.

Completely wrong--you are confusing hardware and software.  3.0 does
*not* require AGA, and 4.0 certainly won't.  Whether there will ever
be a 3.x release for non-AGA machines is a marketing decision, but
there d*mn well better be a 4.x release for the entire line (excepting
the A1000, of course...).

> but if you want AGA you will have to get an AGA machine { A600,
> A1200, A4000 }. SO, it looks like there are now two upgrade, And RKM,
> paths, i.e. AGA and non-AGA. Later, DJ.

Picky point--the A600 is not an AGA machine.

Fundamental point--the programming philosophy above is wrong.  For
most apps, you should be programming for 2.04 or 2.1, keeping in mind
that the display database may hand you screen resolutions you don't
know about now (so be sure to check the resolution and depth, and be
prepared to deal intelligently with deep screens).  If you want to use
3.0 functions, do a version check and have a reasonable fallback.
With a little care, you should be able to write apps that run fine on
2.x, 3.x, and 4.x (with RTG).  So don't try dividing things into AGA
and non-AGA unless you absolutely need AGA functionality (and even
then, you should be prepared for post-AGA).

Back on the original question, there is usually a significant lag
between the release of a new OS version and production of the
corresponding RKMs.  So you're probably best off buying the 2.04
RKMs, and then buying the 3.0 native developer update whenever it
becomes generally available.

-- 
-Dan Riley                          Internet: dsr@lns598.tn.cornell.edu
-Wilson Lab, Cornell University     HEPNET/SPAN: lns598::dsr (44630::dsr)
	      "Distance means nothing/To me." -Kate Bush
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:         UK.AC.DUND.PA;  8 JAN 93 16:50:21 GMT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Fri, 8 Jan 1993 16:53:23 LCL
From:         Mark <PC31@PRIMEA.DUNDEE.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: 68010 processor questions

Lance,

Thanks, I'll check out the new14acc file.


Mark.

*********************************************************************
* Name: Mark J Cargill        ** IBM: Flame them all!!              *
* Internet:pc31@pb.dund.ac.uk ** IBM: Incredibly Boring Machines    *
* Janet:pc31@uk.ac.dund.pb    ** IBM: Infinite Bucks Made           *
*                             ** AMIGA: The choice of CHAMPIONS!!   *
*********************************************************************
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Politics: Can't blame me, I didn't vote for him.
Greeting: Happy Holidays and have a great New Year!
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.i-amiga
Date:         Thu, 7 Jan 1993 11:08:35 EST
From:         Daniel Roman <roman@TIX.TIMEPLEX.COM>
Subject:      Yourmony home budget program

Very recently someone mentioned a program called "yourmony.lzh" which
was available on MRCserv.  I did not realize that MRCserv was not
ftp'able and trying to find a file with one email a day is laborious to
say the least.  Can anyone point out which directory this program is
in?
--
_________
Dan Roman  GEnie: D.ROMAN1  Internet: roman@tix.timeplex.com  //
Ascom Timeplex (NJ)  Homebrew is better brew!  Only AMIGA!  \X/
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU