HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: maryb@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: New Conference (Best of Big8/SWC)
Date: 5 Nov 92 00:19:24 CST
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

In article <1992Nov2.171743.31158@slate.mines.colorado.edu>, wbarnard@slate.mines.colorado.edu (BARNARD WILLIAM NORCOM J ) writes:
> 
> 
>   With all of the rumors about CU moving to the PAC 10 and Texas
>   and Texas A&M leaving the SWC, I wonder why there has been no
>   talk of forming a new conference with the best teams of the 
>   BIG 8 and the SWC?  
> 
>   Imagine a conference with CU, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, and Texas A&M
>   as its core.  Other teams which could/should be included may be Kansas,
>   Kansas St., Baylor, Univ. of Houston, Texas Tech, etc.  This type of
>   conference makes sense with respect to TV revenues as well as geographically.
>   It makes no sense to me to have Texas or Texas A&M flying to Wisconson or
>   California to play games.  (Especially when the less well funded programs
>   like women's basketball and volleyball would be taxed by these new travel
>   expenses.)
> 
>   There are probably some good reasons this has not been discussed, but I 
>   haven't heard them.  What do you think about this idea?
> 
>   Also would someone please post a game review for the Texas v. Texas Tech 
>   game.  It looked like it was close for 3.5 quarters.  
> 
>   Will

As the humble opinion of one Big Eight fan, leave it alone.  No one ever had
this idea until we got really good as a conference in basketball.  Now you want
to mess with something that works.  Now that we have respect, to some extent, I
think we should remain as we are, at least for a while.  What would we call
this new conference, the Big Twelve, Big Fourteen???  No, leave it alone.
I, for one, like it this way.  We should be allowed to enjoy the fruits of our
labors, and believe me, the football fans at Kansas have definitely had their
work cut out in years past.

Kansas Mary
From: marc@yogi.austin.ibm.com (Marc J. Stephenson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Texas injury report???
Date: 6 Nov 92 20:03:56 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <1992Nov4.161458.5704@menudo.uh.edu> HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.) writes:
[regarding 2nd string CB Pascal Watty's broken leg]
>
>  Ouch.  I don't think this is very good for you guys.  The Texas D has been
>giving up a lot of yards of late, and losing a starter certainly can't help
>the situation (well, okay, it MIGHT).  I don't think this will be a problem
>against TCU, whose D is probably more porous, but it would make me nervous
>about Baylor, who will be pumped for their game.

Actually, Watty was the backup.  Joey Ellis strained a hamstring in the
Houston game and was questionable right up until game time for Tech.  Ellis
did not suit up for that game.  Hopefully, Ellis will be back against the
Froggies.

Texas pass defense has been getting hammered this year (last year UT was #1
in pass efficieny defense), but reviews of the game films has shown that the
DBs are playing about at the same level as last year.  It's the pass rush.
There is none at all this year.  Last year's defensive line featured three
lineman that went right into the NFL; Tommy Jeter and James Patton could
apply pressure from the inside, and Shane Dronett (though he had a down year)
and (ugh) Bo Robinson could come from the outside.  On top of that was a 
fairly experienced linebacking squad.  I really believe that it is possible
that Texas's defense was the best in the country; the offense was just so
horrible that the defense had to play too many plays per game.

Stat of the week against Tech: Clemmons throws 52 passes.  0 sacks.

>  RC, get that passing game going, quick!
>
They've still got a couple of games to work out the kinks, but it doesn't
look good.  An article in the Austin American-Statesman compared Granger's
stats to other recent sophomore A&M quarterbacks (Richardson, Pavlas, etc),
and his stats are about as good as theirs.  You have to go all the way back
to Kevin Murray to find a soph qb with decent passing stats.  Maybe this is just
another one of those Aggie traditions. :-)
>
>Jammer Jim Miller 
>Texas A&M University '89 and '91
-- 
Marc Stephenson	           IBM AWS (Advanced Workstations & Systems - Austin,TX)
DISCLAIMER: The content of this posting is independent of official IBM position.
INTERNET->marc@austin.ibm.com      VNET: MARC at AUSVMQ        IBM T/L: 678-3189
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Big 8 Preview reviewed(11-10)
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:21:34 GMT
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


In article <JOHNDOE92Nov10.104850@samadams.inmet>, johndoe@samadams.inmet (johndoe) writes:
>>Sat(11-14)
>>	CU @ KU		 1:00pm
>
johndoe is right....2:30pm ABC.  I forgot to change my schedule
when that came out

>>Sat(12-5)
>>	KSU v NU(Toyko)  9:00pm
>
>is there no national tv coverage of this game (perhaps espn)?
>
No word yet.  I kind of doubt they will.
--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: skipb@cwis.unomaha.edu (Skip Burrell)
Subject: Re: NEBRASKA
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 18:06:58 GMT

m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson) writes:

>Folks! This Nebraska team is not the same team that played at Washington
>earlier this year. This is a team that has matured and is confident. At this
>point I don't care who we get in the Orange Bowl.

I agree, give us the highest ranked team available. This is the team that can
break the Jan 1 jinx we've gone through.

>I think the main factor is "Smokin" Tommy Frazier. Hey, this kid can run the
>option and this kid can pass. Did you see the performance in the 1st half vs
>KU? He can zip that ball. 140 or so yards passing and 3 TD passes. Brown had
>108 yards on the ground in the 1st quarter and they had not even turned Jones
>loose yet. (I could have sworn Jones was a Soph from Omaha. Is it Soph or Jr?)

Brown is a Jr. from California. Jones is a Soph from Omaha Central. (I-back
High) Frazier is definitely the missing part of the offense that Nebraska has
missed for years. With him in at QB the offense is finally running on all
cylinders, and they haven't hit overdrive yet!

>The defense is hot. Of course the home crowd does help them a lot. The NU fans
>are sensing something BIG here. I have NEVER heard them so vocal. The thing
>that impressed me was the Husker secondary. They were all over their
>assignments.

The Blackshirts are finally playing close to their potential. I'd really like
to see Miami (or Washington) try and move the ball against these guys now!

>Now we must keep this in perspective. This is happening at home vs good teams
>but not great teams. I still sense that NU is/has returned to the power it once
>was and possibly even better. Time will tell.

Devany said it is better than '83 or '71. Why? Because we have the dominating
defense of '71 and the overpowering offense of '83 combined on the same team.
Once again, this Husker team is an order of magnitude better than it was
earlier this season. The best in the nation right now?? Hmmmm, could be. ;-)

>KU has nothing to hang their heads about. The Jayhawks are on working on a very
>good season and can do themselves proud with a win next week. Go Kansas -
>destroy CU. Perhaps if you conference with coach Osborne this week he can give
>you some pointers on how to blow out CU.    ;^)

Yeah, GO KANSAS!! :-)

--
Skip Burrell				Internet:	skipb@unomaha.edu
Comp. Sci. Graduate Student		compuserve: 	76146,2323
University of Nebraska at Omaha		AOL:		skipb
My Disclaimer: Any opinion I may have stated was purely unintentional!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: quay@engin.umich.edu (bryan scott luedy)
Subject: Re: National Champs
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 10:00:17 EST
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Distribution: rec
Keywords: Roll Tide

In article <1992Nov10.134248.11909@b15.ingr.com> pruett@b15.ingr.com (Debbie Pruett) writes:
>Like the guy on ESPN says!!!
>Bama  COULD  GO  ALL  THE  WAY!!!!!!!!
>BAMA is playing great!!! Hope they dont choke!!!
>3 games until our National Championship!!!
>R-O-L-L T-I-D-E!!!
>
>(some UM fan will have some BS to say i'm sure)

We've learned (the hard way) to let the Gods of Woofdom
do the talking.

--
Bryan.Luedy@um.cc.umich.edu
--

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rjones@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Randolph M. Jones)
Subject: Re: STANFORD/ARIZONA TRASH
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:22:58 GMT

In article <14020@cis.rand.org> bentow@cis.rand.org (Stan Bentow) writes:
>In article <aelman.721358597@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> aelman@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Adam Elman) writes:
>>
>>Again, the only reason that the U$C Band plays with all these artists,
>>TV, movies, etc. is because _you're_in_LA_!!!!!  
>
>UCLA's also in LA.

Imagine that...and guess what?  UCLA *also* has played with various artists and
in movies, etc.  I think Adam's point is very well taken.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: elfering@socrates.umd.edu (David J. Elfering)
Subject: Re: Nebraska and patsies --  C U later
Organization: University of Maryland University College
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 17:15:14 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.122013@mccall.com> scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis) writes:
KU-NU GAME..
(text ommitted)
>
>I guess I maybe the only one giving KU any hope in this game.
>Most odds are are 10+ for Neb.  Maybe it is that I tend to
>favor the underdog.  This is the OrangeBowl (invite)game.
>KU hosts CU and visits MU(no easy games here).  NU visits
>ISU and OU, then to Toyko vs KSU.  Should be easy wins.
>
>Note: that KSU and NU are on the same plane to Toyko.
>--
>Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
>(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
>(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
>
 As a Husker fan I'm plenty nervous about Kansas. I remember nearly
croaking last year when KU ran off to a 17 point lead before Calvin Jones
just went wild on them. The Huskers went to #1 in the Sagarin ratings this
week an din my mind that sets them up to take the big fall if they go into
this game being a little too cocky. KU is for real and I'm expecting a
smash nosed, grunt'n, spitt'n nails type of Big 8 clash out of this game.
My only questions about KU surround whether they have enough depth to go 4
quarters, and their overall team speed on defense.

Dave Elfering   - A Husker fan in ACC land
elfering@socrates.umd.edu (Univ. Maryland)


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (odagleD niveK)
Subject: Re:  Virginia vs NCSU game (was My Top 25)
Organization: Florida State University Computing Center
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 20:16:23 GMT

In article <mp.721507113@news.ncsu.edu> mp@sparcler.cc.ncsu.edu (Manoj Kumar Patel) writes:
>rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>
>>14. NC State   They sure cleaned Virginia's clock. However, as UVA is in
>>               fold-up mode I think Navy could play 'em close now.
>>-rob
>
>
>Hmmm, no-one brought this up yet, so I may as well (no you don't have
>a choice in the matter).
>
>I felt that the game could have been very different if the Virginia
>offense could have gotten started (though NCSU would still have won
>of course :-). 
>
>However, Virginia "fans" never allowed that to happen.
>
>Goodman overthrew his very first pass (a few plays into the game), and
>the fans started booing right away. What a way to help a QB shrug off
>a missed pass and gain some confidence.
>
>Anyway, Goodman rarely passed after that (until the end of the first
>half when they had to move the ball quickly).
>State pretty much only had to cover the run. If Goodman had thrown
>a few more passes and spread our offense a little more...
>
>It was unbelievable. I have heard other teams being booed by their own
>fans before, but right after ONE missed pass? only a few plays into the
>game?
>
>They didn't let up later either (though they did have the decency to
>give the defense a standing O when they played well).
>
>This hurts the Cavs in many ways:
>
>1) any recruits attending were probably not impressed by the booing.
>
>2) the offense never really got a chance to get settled.
>
>3) any bowl scouts there will (and should) assume that booing fans are not
>   likely to pay big bucks to attend a bowl game.
>
>Any thoughts? Explanations from Cav fans?
>
>On a better note, Kirby was amazing. If he hadn't been injured
>(and if Va. fans gave their team a chance to win) he would be
>a Heisman candidate. It usually took 2/3 players to stop him
>(I don't mean stop him for no gain, I mean stop him after the first
>down).  He seemed to move the ball at will. Kudos to the State 
>Defense for somehow stopping Va. from scoring (too many).
>
>    Manoj
>
Is it me, or does it just seem that this kind of behavior is typical of the
majority (no, not all) of the fans of UVa? They are just a bunch of spoiled
little brats who can't stand it when they don't get their way. If _I_ were
a player on UVa's team, I would find it very hard not to start hurling large,
heavy objects up into the stands. They are simply stupid to boo their team.
UVa's problems evolved maily from a heart-breaking loss to Clemson (which
put a damper on the teams spirits) and injuries (which is what a team deserves
to get if they continue to play on the fake stuff...get some real grass UVa!).
If their fans had tried to support them after the Clemson loss, and were more
cogniscent of the temas injuries, they might realize that the team was very
vulnerable. However, they just act like children. I'm surprised they didn't go
down on the field and take thier ball and go home.

Kevin
From: wessir@shelley.u.washington.edu (bill the cat)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Huskies scandal could help Arizona again!
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:04:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Nov10.190403.5640
Reply-To: wessir@u.washington.edu
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle



Hello sports fans.
   Just how big of a deal is the Billy Hobert scandal?
Maybe big enough for Arizona fans to celebrate again at the misfortune of the
Husky football team.  Seems that Thursday will be the deciding date.  If the
ruling is that the coaches knew about the loan then the Huskies forfeit enough
games to knock them out of the Rose Bowl picture.  If the Huskies win their
last two games and Arizona wins it's last two then Arizona goes to the Rose
Bowl and has a chance at the national title.  Arizona fans hold your breath
till Thursday!
wessir
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Meeks = Corso = CORRECT!!!!!
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 92 15:02:33 GMT
Organization: VMark Software, Inc.

 I really shouldn't do this, but I took a lot of abuse for stating my opinion
 that Arizona was going to beat Washington.  Seems like ol' Lee and I may be
 the only ones in the US that predicted it correctly.  

 So, to all those "doubters" out there, to all those computers that gave 
 Arizona no chance, to all those UW fans that criticize, nah, ridiculed
 my selection, I say to thee, with my dearest, most heartfelt sympathy...

 " Ack....Phhhpppttttt"  


 As to the ongoing thread of "The War is Over"... Well, the "War" is over..
 But only if you count the war as being the Miami/Washington debate.  There
 were people that went as far as saying that, since it was in Arizona, that
 Washington could even lose by a couple and they would be better.  Well, the
 lost, and they lost by more than a couple.  

 Hats off to Arizona, playing one of the tougher schedules in the nation, and
 coming within 3 FGs of being undefeated and possibly #1.  Impressive showing
 against #1 Miami, wins over UCLA, Stanford, Cal, and Washington.  If they
 finish up with a win at USC, this could be one of those sad stories of...
 "Probably one of the top 3 teams in the nation, but with those 2 losses and
 1 tie... well..."


 Anyway, I decided to post MY top 15 this week....


 Meeks Top Fifteen...

 1)  Miami		- cannot be denied.  Tough schedule, no losses..
 2)  Alabama		- no losses, very impressive looking (weak schedule)
 3)  FSU		- tough schedule, beat everyone but Miami...
 4)  Michigan		- well, see Alabama, but they have 1 "non-win"
 5)  Arizona		- Very tough schedule, only losses to WSU and Miami,
			  beat Washington, Stanford, Cal, UCLA
 6)  Washington		- Tough schedule, only loss to Arizona.. Beat Nebraska,
			  USC, Cal, and Stanford.
 7)  Nebraska		- weak schedule, but only loss to Washington, see 
			  Alabama and Michigan
 8)  Texas A&M		- weak schedule, but undefeated...
 9)  Syracuse 		- average schedule, only loss to Ohio State 
 10) Notre Dame		- average schedule, loss to Stanford, tied Michigan
 11) Stanford		- tough schedule, losses to Texas A&M, Arizona, and
			  Washington.. Wins over Notre Dame, UCLA, and USC
 12) Florida		- pretty tough schedule, losses at Tennessee and at
			  Miss. St, wins over Georgia, Auburn, S. Miss.
 13) Miss. State	- pretty tough schedule, wins over Auburn, Memphis St,
			  Florida, Auburn, losses to LSU and S. Carolina hurt
 14) Boston College	- average schedule, wins over Penn State, loss at ND,
			  tie at W. Virginia.  Impressive looking (except ND)
 15) Georgia
-- 
David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason Fawcett)
Subject: Re: Miami #1
Reply-To: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett)
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 23:29:24 GMT

News-Software: NN 6.4.16

In <1992Nov12.143659.17738@u.washington.edu> yeonwook@hardy.u.washington.edu (Mark Choi) writes:

| , for Arizona is a genuine football team.
| You do not realize the competitive nature of the PAC-10...the conference
| of champions. There is no doubt that the PAC-10 is THE BEST CONFERENCE.


We don't even have a real National Champ system yet, and every one wants the
booby prize for best conferene.  Well the best conference for the last
ten years has been the independents.  Play for the National Champ, because
Conference champs should only get a trophy out of a box of Cracker Jacks.

Conference don't play, teams play other teams.  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: beckham@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Jeff Beckham)
Subject: Re: How did the Illini choke?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 04:45:25 GMT

gt38091@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Greg ) writes:
>I can't believe you guys are still talking about this.   It's time for a 
>reality check fellas:  Illinois is a WEAK team in a VERY WEAK conference!

If you want it to stop, then don't make posts about it that will lead to others!
Granted, Illinois is a weak team... very young, but still weak.  I would like
to give the team a few years, and give Lou Tepper a few years under his belt.
As for the weak conference comment... have you heard of a team from way up
north...  I don't know....    Ann Arbor I think....     

        HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN????????????
				   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Although this is the ONLY strong team in the Big-10... I think they compensate,
SOME, for the rest of the conference.  Weak conference...  Whatever...



  			   	   --------------------------------------------
								  Jeff Beckham
						      beckham@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
 					 	  Computer Science/Mathematics
                                    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
				   --------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: imes@boa.cis.ohio-state.edu (jeffrey imes)
Subject: Re: Stanford 23, U$C 9 (includes marching band stuff)
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 23:35:30 GMT

In article <aelman.721269258@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> aelman@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Adam Elman) writes:

[...bulk deleted...]

>either pregame or halftime during the third or fourth quarter.  Most
>college bands I know of try to vary our song selection a bit, except
>for the fight song(s), which are generally only played in their
>entirety after scores.  You will rarely, for instance, hear the

Ever been to a Michigan game at Ann Arbor?  They play "Hail..." so many times
that it gets absolutely sickening.  And that's all they play.  Over and over
and over and over...it's visiting team-torture.  Not that they haven't been
able to back it up lately, but really.  Enough is enough.  Get some variety.

===============================================================================
Jeffrey Imes                                            imes@cis.ohio-state.edu
CIS Undergraduate Student	                 "The brain doesn't need blood,
B.S.C.I.S. 3/94					  it just needs to be wet."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: C14596@maccvm.corp.mot.com (Danielle Solomon)
Subject: Re: Boston College
Organization: Motorola
Date: 6 Nov 1992 10:46:42 CST

WELL DEBRA I AGREE WITH YOU.  IT IS ABOUT TIME THAT SCHOOL OF YOURS
DID SOMETHING.  YOU KNOW WHO THIS IS......
From: maryb@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Jayhawk Post #43 (KU&NU partial roster for TV)
Date: 7 Nov 92 00:46:35 CST
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

#13 KANSAS JAYHAWKS                      #7 NEBRASKA CORNHUSKERS
Head Coach:  Glen Mason                  Head Coach: Tom Osborne

Offense:                                 Offense:
WR   5 Matt Gay          5-11 180  Sr.   SE  80 Trumane Bell      6-3  210  Jr.
TE   1 Dwayne Chandler   6-2  240  Jr.   LT  77 Lance Lundberg    6-4  300  Jr.
LT  76 Khristopher Booth 6-3  285  So.   LG  62 Kent Mehlin       6-0  265  Jr.
LG  66 Hessley Hempstead 6-1  287  So.   C   51 Jim Scott         6-2  265  Sr.
C   75 Dan Schmidt       6-2  275  Jr.   RG  75 Will Shields      6-1  305  Sr.
RG  69 John Jones        6-2  285  So.   RT  72 Zach Wiegert      6-5  310  So.
RT  74 Keith Loneker     6-3  305  Sr.   TE  89 William Washington6-2  260  Sr.
WR  81 Rob Licursi       6-0  200  Sr.   QB  15 Tommie Frazier    6-0  190  Fr.
QB  18 Chip Hilleary     6-1  185  Sr.   FB  26 Lance Lewis       6-0  225  Sr.
TB  26 Maurice Douglas   5-10 195  Sr.   IB  21 Derek Brown       5-9  185  Jr.
FB  32 Chris Powell      5-11 215  So.   WB  38 Vincent Hawkins   5-11 210  Sr.
PK-P31 Dan Eichloff      6-0  215  Jr.   P      Mike Stigge                 Sr.

FB  33 Monte Cozzens     5-10 225  Sr.   


Defense:                                 Defense:
OLB 39 Don Davis         6-1  220  So.   LOLB93 Travis Hill       6-2  240  Sr.
LE  96 Kyle Moore        6-3  250  Sr.   LT  92 John Parella      6-5  290  Sr.
LT  72 Chris Maumalanga  6-3  290  Jr.   NG  73 David Noonan      6-3  275  Jr.
RT  71 Dana Stubblefield 6-3  285  Sr.   RT  90 Bruce Moore       6-6  240  Jr.
RE  93 Brian Christian   6-3  260  Jr.   ROLB34 Trev Alberts      6-4  230  Jr.
OLB  7 Hassan Bailey     6-0  205  Sr.   SLB 48 Mike Anderson     6-2  235  Jr.
MLB 35 Larry Thiel       6-3  220  Jr.   WLB 32 Ed Stewart        6-0  205  So.
CB  38 Robert Vaughn     6-0  190  Jr.   LCB 19 Kenny Wilhite     5-8  175  Sr.
FS   8 Kwamie Lassiter   6-1  175  Jr.   RCB  6 John Reece        6-0  200  Jr.
SS  22 Charley Bowen     5-10 195  Sr.   SS  31 Steve Carmer      6-2  210  Sr.
CB   3 Gerald McBurrows  5-11 185  So.   FS   8 Tyrone Byrd       6-0  180  Sr.

RE  90 Guy Howard        6-3  230  Jr.   
FS  47 Clint Bowen       6-0  190  Jr.   

SOURCE: Kansas Football Media Guide.

Posted to r.s.f.c. by Kansas Mary