HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: avolio@dco.DEC.COM (Frederick M. Avolio)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: Re: How do I fix up my From: header?
Date: 9 Oct 92 20:28:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: decuac.1992Oct9.202856.6590
Reply-To: avolio@dco.DEC.COM (Frederick M. Avolio)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp., Washington ULTRIX Resource Center


Add a From: line to your components file with the way you want your mail
to look.

You can, however, configure sendmail to do this for you if you wanted.  But
adding your own From: line via components should do it.

F
From: nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: Bug in slocal?
Date: 9 Oct 92 22:59:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Oct9.225914.5504
Reply-To: nelson@reed.edu (Nelson Minar)
Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR

I've been having this problem with slocal, and automatic delivery of
mail, for at least a year now through several versions of MH. It's
starting to bug me. If anyone could tell me "oh yeah, that's a known
MH bug", or even "When this occurs, do X to get your mail back", I'd
be most obliged.

Problem: sometimes my mail never gets delivered. I'll have two slocal
processes (one the child of the other) hanging on the mail machine.
There is no rcvstore, or any other child of the slocal.  The only way
to perturb the slocals in any fashion is to send them a signal 9 (no
SIGHUP, no SIGTERM). When they go away, the mailer correctly
recognizes that my mail failed to deliver, but doesn't seem to bounce
the mail. (It will try to redeliver later, I think).

I can make a few qualitative observations: it seems to happen more
often with mail that gets sent to me via /usr/lib/mail/aliases (I get
"usenet" and "postmaster" and "root" mail) than mail directly
addressed to me. It is not caused by my running out of process slots
or system resources. But I can't find a common feature to the bounces.

mail delivery configuration:

.forward:
"| exec /local/lib/mh/slocal -user nelson"

.maildelivery:
To	nelson		qpipe	A	"/local/lib/mh/rcvstore +inbox"
cc	nelson		qpipe	A	"/local/lib/mh/rcvstore +inbox"

From 	uucp		> 	R	/dev/null
Subject	"UUCP Summary"	destroy	N	-

default	-	qpipe	A	"/local/lib/mh/rcvstore +inbox"
default	-	>	A	/usr/spool/mail/nelson

.mh_profile:
showproc: /local/bin/less
Editor: /local/bin/emacs
scan: -form scan.nelson

(I should note that this problem has also occurred under many
mutations of that .maildelivery file, and without the exec in the pipe
for the .forward)

Software: smail as delivery system, no NFS involved in mail delivery,
version 6.7 of MH. here are the slocal IDs:

     $Id: slocal.c,v 1.10 1992/01/30 00:06:00 jromine Exp $
     $Id: aliasbr.c,v 1.7 90/04/05 14:59:03 sources Exp $
     $Id: dropsbr.c,v 1.12 90/11/05 13:26:50 mh Exp $
     $Id: config.c,v 1.5 1992/01/24 00:35:28 jromine Exp $
     $Id: help.c,v 1.2 1992/01/25 01:19:05 jromine Exp $
     $Id: m_getfld.c,v 1.9 1992/01/24 18:03:41 jromine Exp $
     $Id: pidwait.c,v 1.5 1992/01/29 23:57:28 jromine Exp $
     $Id: strindex.c,v 2.2 1990/04/05 15:30:30 sources Exp $
     $Id: m_msgdef.c,v 1.1 1992/01/24 18:22:58 jromine Exp $
     $Id: makedir.c,v 1.7 1992/01/23 23:12:43 jromine Exp $
     $Id: dtime.c,v 1.7 90/04/09 13:23:19 sources Exp $
     $Id: mts.c,v 2.7 91/02/14 15:17:56 mh Exp $
     $Id: lock.c,v 2.4 91/01/18 08:43:29 mh Exp Locker: mh $

I hate losing mail.
                __
nelson@reed.edu \/        It's a sky blue sky, the satellites are out tonight
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
From: obi@gumby.ocs.com (Obi Thomas)
Subject: How to concatenate FAQ postings?
Reply-To: obi@gumby.ocs.com
Organization: Online Computer Systems, Inc.
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 20:10:27 GMT

I use mh 6.7.2 to store all interesting posts on usenet, including FAQs
(using xrn's refile capability). I'd like to concatenate the parts of a
multi-part posting like a FAQ so it gets stored as one message. Is there a
way to do this that would remove the headers from each message except the
first?

I couldn't find an answer in the FAQ. If someone could point me at the
right mh utility to use, I can probably figure out what to do from Jerry
Peek's book and the manpage.

Please reply by email and I'll summarize if there's interest. Thank you.
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
From: victor@watson.ibm.com (Victor Miller)
Subject: Resent-Bcc and Apparently-To
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 13:52:58 GMT
Reply-To: victor@watson.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM, T.J. Watson Research Center

I am redistributing a bunch of messages to people on a mailing list.
I use the Resent-Bcc header so that there won't be a large header with
all the addresses in the mailing list.  However, the receieved mail
contains a huge number of "Apparently-To" headers giving all the
recipients!  I'm using post to send out the message.  I assume that
sendmail is adding these things.  Isn't this a bug?  How can I get
around it?

--
		Victor S. Miller
		Bitnet: VICTOR at WATSON
		Internet: victor@watson.ibm.com
		IBM, TJ Watson Research Center
		"Great artists steal; lesser artists borrow" Igor Stravinsky
Xref: sparky comp.mail.misc:3292 news.admin.misc:106
From: nauen@WRAIR-EMH1.ARMY.MIL
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Figuring out this odd address.
Date: 15 Oct 92 17:35:00 GMT

In <1992Oct15.042356.8513@u.washington.edu> miser@milton.u.washington.edu
(Robert Fulwell) writes:

> I recently received this address to reach my brother overseas (Britain), but
> I'm having trouble deciphering it.  I'd like to know if it will work, and if
> not, how I can make it work.
> 
>  MHS!KCC/S=TIM/O=SERVER@ATTMAIL.COM.

It should work, but if not, the best way to make it work might be to write
to postmaster@attmail.com for specific assistance with the results of your
attempt.

Ric

Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: adz@heckle (Andrew D. Zenowich)
Subject: Conversion from mh to imap mailboxes.
Keywords: mh, imap, Berkely, mailboxes 
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:29:25 GMT

Does anyone know how to convert the mh style mailboxes 
to the Berkely or IMAP style malboxes? Some of the people
here want to begin using Mailstrom but they don't want to 
loose all there older mail.

------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew D. Zenowich   | These questions, comments, opinions | 
adz@mitre.org        | are my own and do not reflect in    | 
                     | any way those of The MITRE Corp.    |
------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: pinesoft@netcom.com (Pine Software)
Subject: Re: Wanted: PC Windows Email for Unix Mail
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 00:38:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.040401.15510@iti.gov.sg> jinho@iti.gov.sg (Tan Jin Ho) writes:
>
>I am looking for an MS Windows-based Email application program that runs on
>top of standard PC TCP/IP networks and uses SMTP and/or POP. (ie. it can
>read and send UNIX mail).
>
>Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>Tan Jin Ho
>jinho@iti.gov.sg


You recently requested information about Pine Software's e-mail
product, I have included an announcement of Open Systems Mail(TM).
Our product currently supports the following TCP/IP stacks, PCNFS,
FTP's PC-TCP, Wollongong's Pathways, and Novell's LAN workplace for DOS.
Support for more TCP-IP products is being supported.

PINE SOFTWARE
PO Box 3041 Stanford, CA  94309
(415) 962-8687 e-mail, pinesoft@netcom.com (Internet) 

Pine Software, Inc. is pleased to introduce Open Systems Mail(TM) 
for Microsoft(TM) Windows(TM).  Open Systems Mail is a fully 
featured, easy-to-use electronic mail application designed or IBM 
PCs and compatibles running Microsoft Windows/DOS-based TCP/IP 
client protocols.  This product is one of the only electronic mail 
products for MS Windows that truly conforms to open systems and 
standards (SMTP, TCP/IP, RFCs).


The following is a list of  planned future enhancements:


    - Program icon will indicate arrival of new mail while minimized

    - Tool and status bar for improved functionality and ease-of-use

    - Allow user to send and receive binary attachments in accordance
      with MIME specification

    - Improved performance for all message and folder operations

    - A new version designed for use with portable computers and modems

    - A Macintosh equivalent for MacTCP

Open Systems Mail_ is available now, directly from Pine Software.  
Please contact us for more information.
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: whitaker@eternity.demon.co.uk ("Russell E. Whitaker")
Subject: Public access UNIX hosts -- where and how? 
Distribution: world
Organization: Extropy Institute
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 11:49:04 +0000


In article <AAAS9sguW9@sph.spb.su> avsht@sph.spb.su writes:

>
>Hi everybody!
>

Hi Alex!  Always interesting to see posts from the Rodina.  ;-)

>I've heard about existance of public access UNIX hosts in the USA.
>Does anyone is able to obtain his own Internet e-mail address?
>How to contact them? Is a complete list somewhere?
>

You should send a message with the text "send nixpub long short" in the
subject line to:
           archive-server@cs.widener.edu

>Alexander Shturm  ||  St.-Petersburg  ||  Internet: avsht@sph.spb.su
>================  ||   Russia (xSU)   ||  FidoNet:  2:5030/8.18, /43.18
>Tel.: +7-(812)-233-9148 (home)   +7-(812)-310-4631 (office)
>

Russell Earl Whitaker                   whitaker@eternity.demon.co.uk
Communications Editor                       71750.2413@compuserve.com
EXTROPY: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought         AMiX: RWHITAKER
Board member, Extropy Institute (ExI)
[.sig revised 1 October 1992    ///    Send mail to eternity node]
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.0

mQCNAiqwg10AAAEEAMVNMI766ljeuW01xqXKYYV5lmDPvb+6dCQK3m1iBQdan0no
pm35j1DIRp3UJZogAe5eimsQg1TALDhTq310OZs9+L6B/HxeX3+4BadIDad4g+xI
lvaFY1Ut/hMdZNkw0tzNZOdUPiO4jYIyirReAUiMCm6jXzkTRITj7/vxxWtPAAUR
tDNSdXNzZWxsIEUuIFdoaXRha2VyIDx3aGl0YWtlckBldGVybml0eS5kZW1vbi5j
by51az4=
=LOCL
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: rsingh@goliath.Stanford.EDU (   raj)
Subject: Re: Helpful Tips For This week
Organization: Makalu Mountain Hermitage, Mt Makalu, Nepal
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 22:18:03 GMT

In article <gate.9e9isB1w165w@global.Gwinnett.COM> abacus@global.Gwinnett.COM writes:
>
>			ABACUS GLOBAL SUPPORT, INC.
>  			  HELPFULL HINTS ON 1-2-3
>			      FOR PCs AND MACs
[Junk deleted....]


>
>				COURTASY OF:
                                ^^^^^^^^
Ahem.

>--
>Abacus Global Support, Inc.            INTERNET: abacus@global.gwinnett.com
>9566 N.W. 41 Street                    COMPUSERVE: 71201.1201@compuserve.com
>Miami, FL   33178
>VOICE: 1-800-848-9192    BBS: 1-800-643-3630


Hmm.... here we go again.  I just called these guys and an idiot named
"Antonio Dios" thinks he's doing us all a favor with. His reasoning is
that .misc in the newsgroup name implies anything goes.

Now if this doesn't call for mail bombs, I don't know what does.
Where is the postmaster@gwinnet.com who was here a few days ago
defending Abacus's last mailings as "an indiscretion".

--raj

-- 
Rajesh Kumar Singh               E-mail: rsingh@goliath.stanford.edu
Gauls!  We have nothing to fear; except perhaps that the sky may fall
on our heads tomorrow.  But as we all know, tomorrow never comes!!
                                         -- Adventures of Asterix.
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
From: ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis)
Subject: Re: When should one use MX records?
Followup-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation Tech Central
	<bvw0j1.1ys@wang.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 05:35:35 GMT

[this is leaving mail and heading for DNS territory.  Watch followups]
Tom> == Tom Fitzgerald <fitz@wang.com> 
RD>  == dhesi@rahul.net (Rahul Dhesi) writes:

 RD> c: Several MX records are often assumed to be more reliable for
 RD> mail.  However, it's not clear to me that they buy you much.
 RD> Presumably if foo.company.uk is down, mail will remain queued for
 RD> it at one of the MX hosts.  It might as well just remain queued at
 RD> the sending host.

We define two sorts of failures: machinewide and sitewide.  Machine wide
is level 0 backups, disk reconfigurations, blown ether MAUs, that kind
of thing.  Sitewide is usually either a power outage or our Internet
link going down (the latter mostly).

Machinewide failures of our mailhost (eff.org) get mail delivered to the
first backup MX, which is on the same ether.  Then when we bring the
main machine back up, we just /usr/lib/sendmail -v -Reff.org to flush
all mail with 'eff.org' in the recipient address.  Over the local ether
between two SS2s this is quite fast.  Much faster than waiting for all
those 1 hour (usually) queue runs to come around again.

Sitewide failures fall back to our 'last ditch' MXes at the net
provider.  This is more so that if we're expecting Real Important Mail
while we're down, we can arrange to have them flush their queue at us
when we return to life than anything else.

 Tom> For ftp, it seems like there's a growing tradition for having a
 Tom> CNAME for ftp.company.uk pointing to the ftp server.

We do this too.  The "service" CNAME is a really useful thing to have;
when we added machines, we moved the ftp server to one of the new
machines to spread out the load.  Folks who used 'ftp.eff.org' were set
as soon as the old records timed out where they were; folks who used IP#
or "true" hostname lost (there is a redirect message on the old machine
still, though).
--
Christopher K. Davis      |       NET.INSIGHTS INTO ARTISTIC CRITICISM:
<ckd@eff.org>   EFF #14   | ``[Y]ou don't cure bad art by locking it all up
System Administrator, EFF | in one museum, you cure it by throwing tomatoes
+1 617 864 0665  [CKD1]   | at bad artists.'' --Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
From: jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: More unsolicited advertising e-mail.
Date: 14 Oct 92 20:37:38 GMT
Organization: Dixie Communications Public Access.  The Mouth of the South.

pacolley@ember.UUCP (Paul Colley) writes:

>Obviously, everybody should start sending bulk junk information to
>John De Armond postage-due.  Better yet, if he has a cellular phone,
>somebody local should dial him every hour or so and read the
>classified ads to him, just in case some of it is useful information
>to John.  After all, John thinks the recipient should pay the cost
>of receiving electronic junk mail, which classified ads by celluar
>phone certainly qualify as.  Electronic junk, that is.

Innovative concept but you have a couple of small problems to overcome.
I practice what I preach and filter junk mail right at the post office.
Postage-due stuff gets returned.  I do have a cell phone but since 
making harrassing phone calls to cellular numbers is illegal in 
Ga (and maybe nationwide.), things could get very uncomfortable for you.
At the very minimum, it could be considered theft of services.  Since
the cellular system bill provides a very nice paper trail, cellular
harrassment is not a good move at all.

John
-- 
John De Armond, WD4OQC               |Interested in high performance mobility?  
Performance Engineering Magazine (TM) |
Marietta, Ga                         |Interested in high tech and computers? 
jgd@dixie.com                        |Write me about PE Magazine
Need Usenet public Access in Atlanta?  Write Me for info on Dixie.com.
From: zaphod@madnix.uucp (Ron Bean)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Whereinthehellis dg-rtp.dg.com?
Date: 5 Oct 92 23:43:14 GMT
Organization: ARP Software


   There's a regular posting to news.answers that says there is a
mail server at dg-rtp.dg.com for the FAQ file from
misc.consumers.house (so why don't they just post the file?
That's what news.answers is for...)
 
   I've tried sending mail there, but madnix can't find it in the
maps, and bouncing it off uwvax and uunet hasn't produced any
results either. Does anyone out there know how to reach this
site?
 
==================
zaphod@madnix.UUCP (Ron Bean)
uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!madnix!zaphod
From: markb@spock.dis.cccd.edu (Mark Bixby)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Whereinthehellis dg-rtp.dg.com?
Date: 7 Oct 92 15:28:57 GMT
Organization: Coast Community College District, Costa Mesa, CA

I can "ping" dg-rtp.dg.com just fine; it's IP address is 128.222.1.2.
-- 
Mark Bixby                         Internet: markb@spock.dis.cccd.edu
Coast Community College District   1370 Adams Avenue
District Information Services      Costa Mesa, CA, USA  92626
Technical Support                  (714) 432-5064
"You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish." - tunefs(1M)
Xref: sparky comp.mail.misc:3349 news.admin.misc:147
From: jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,news.admin.misc
Subject: Re: More unsolicited advertising e-mail.
Date: 12 Oct 92 08:49:11 GMT
Organization: Dixie Communications Public Access.  The Mouth of the South.

frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca (Steve Frampton) writes:

>> I publish a newsletter about fractals called Amygdala (29 issues so 
>> far) which you may be interested in.

>[...stuff deleted...]

>> The price for 10 issues, including First Class / Air Mail postage, is
>> US $28.20; Canada/Mexico $32.00; Other $39.00

I really appreciate your posting that ad.  I'm nuts about fractals and read
whatever I can on the subject.  I'll be subscribing just as soon as I 
get the full text of the ad from that fellow.

See how useful net.advertising is?  Even when you don't mean to?

John

-- 
John De Armond, WD4OQC               |Interested in high performance mobility?  
Performance Engineering Magazine (TM) |
Marietta, Ga                         |Interested in high tech and computers? 
jgd@dixie.com                        |Write me about PE Magazine
Need Usenet public Access in Atlanta?  Write Me for info on Dixie.com.
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,news.answers
From: nauen@WRAIR-EMH1.ARMY.MIL
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Missing e-mail address - help!
Date: 7 Oct 92 22:30:00 GMT

In <6921@kielouta.fi> cstila@uta.fi (Timo Laitinen) writes:

> I'd like to know e-mail address of Marko Laine, who studies at the
> university of Ulm (Germany). I know university's address, but I can't
> find him with using 'finger'. Could you help me!

Suggest you try postmaster@(whatever address you have for university).

Ric <nauen@wrair-emh1.army.mil>  <nauen%wrmain.decnet@detrick-emh1.army.mil>
           ^^^^^Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
        U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
From: jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca (John Henders)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Question about unsolicited Internet Email.
Keywords: question legal use email
Date: 6 Oct 92 18:05:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: jonh.H.ea.Y2Jj2TE1e5Y
	<1992Oct05.084013.24430@clarinet.com>
	<1992Oct5.142707.14633@infodev.cam.ac.uk> <7496@lib.tmc.edu>
Distribution: world
Organization: One of these days for sure
X-News: HERMES MMAIL 1.04 Rev. Sep  5 1992

In <7496@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
>In article <1992Oct5.142707.14633@infodev.cam.ac.uk> crj10@phx.cam.ac.uk (Clive Jones) writes:
>>I believe the UK powers-that-be might do something about this incident soon...

>What, pray tell, can they do? Remember that the junk email came from the
>US...are they going to extradite the perpetrators? 

    This doesn't seem to stop the US, why should different standards apply to 
other countries. ;-)


-- 
       John Henders      jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca
    I think your "evolutionary scale" needs an adjustment.  Either 
      that, or you've got your thumb on it. -> (lefty@apple.com)
From: pacolley@ember.UUCP (Paul Colley)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: More unsolicited advertising e-mail.
Date: 15 Oct 92 18:10:47 GMT
Reply-To: pacolley@ember.UUCP (Paul Colley)
Organization: Ember---private system


My claim is that junk Email is in exactly the same category as junk
cellular calls---the recipient is paying.

John seems to have just a little trouble with the idea that I pay
for my Email, while he does understand that he pays for his cellular
calls.  A curious blindspot.

The remainder of this posting is a parody, and does not contain
new information.

In article <0wpp!cj@dixie.com> jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes:

>pacolley@ember.UUCP (Paul Colley) writes:
>
>>Obviously, everybody should start sending bulk junk information to
>>John De Armond postage-due.  Better yet, if he has a cellular phone,
>>somebody local should dial him every hour or so and read the
>>classified ads to him, just in case some of it is useful information
>>to John.  After all, John thinks the recipient should pay the cost
>>of receiving electronic junk mail, which classified ads by celluar
>>phone certainly qualify as.  Electronic junk, that is.
>
>Innovative concept but you have a couple of small problems to overcome.
>I practice what I preach and filter junk mail right at the post office.
>Postage-due stuff gets returned.  I do have a cell phone but since 
>making harrassing phone calls to cellular numbers is illegal in 
>Ga (and maybe nationwide.), things could get very uncomfortable for you.
>At the very minimum, it could be considered theft of services.  Since
>the cellular system bill provides a very nice paper trail, cellular
>harrassment is not a good move at all.

Innovative concept but you have a couple of small problems to
overcome.  I practice what I preach and filter junk mail right at
the post office.  Postage-due stuff gets returned.  I do have a
Email account but since harrassment is illegal in Ontario (and
maybe even in your country or state), things could get very
uncomfortable for you.  At the very minimum, it could be considered
theft of services.  Since the system logs provide a very nice audit
trail, Email harrassment is not a good move at all.

- Paul Colley
University:  colley@qucis.queensu.ca
Home:        pacolley@ember.uucp   watmath!ember!pacolley  +1 613 545 3807
<Ring> [...] "Sorry, I'm all booked up." "Who was that?" "The library." - B.C.
From: nauen@WRAIR-EMH1.ARMY.MIL
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Kenyon College (was Email UNIX to VMS)
Date: 14 Oct 92 21:55:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.9210142103.AA08162

In <Bw2LFx.7Cs@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> galosirs@fe626.cc.purdue.edu (Rob) says

> I've been trying for some time now to send E-mail to a friend at kenyon
> college in Gambier Ohio. . . .  Unfortunately, the message was returned
> to  me as the following:
>
> >From: MAILER-DAEMON@feserve.cc.purdue.edu (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
> >Subject: Returned mail: Cannot send message for 3 days
>
> >   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>421 vax001.kenyon.edu: Connection refused by vax001.kenyon.edu

Well, it could have been a temporary problem which has now been fixed,
so you should probably try it again.  

However, vax001.kenyon.edu is at this moment refusing SMTP connections, 
so it could be something more complex.  Seems like the best help might
come from postmaster@kenyon.edu.  If you can't get mail to that address
either, then you should contact your own postmaster for assistance.

Ric

PS.  I changed the subject because I don't think that type of hardware
has anything to do with it.  The basis of Internet email is that any
kind of machine is supposed to be able to send to any other kind of
machine as long as they have both implemented the Simple Mail Transport
Protocol (SMTP).
Xref: sparky comp.mail.misc:3375 news.admin.misc:157