HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gil@limbic.ssdl.com (Gil Kloepfer Jr.)
Subject: Re: Saga of a ZyXel U-1496E modem
Keywords: dead
Organization: Southwest Systems Development Labs, Sugar Land, TX
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 06:41:31 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.100038.26484@zia.aoc.nrao.edu> crucci@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (Chuck Rucci) writes:
[Saga of problems with ZyXel modem deleted]
>I hope that ZyXel is now happy that the thing finally
>died and fell into the grave so that they can replace it now. It is
>very unfortunate that this is what it takes since everyone raved about
>these modems on the internet. (that's why I bought it in the first place)

Before you convince everyone to junk their ZyXels (:-) :-)) just remember
that Telebit has had some pretty "interesting" (I use that term very
loosely) problems with their firmware, and YOU have to convince THEM
that it's THEIR problem before they will admit they already have a fix
and can send it to you.  At least ZyXel releases ROM updates on a BBS.

Telebit-- Listen-up!  Publishing firmware updates is a GOOD IDEA!  Now
that you've put that cute little security PAL in the WorldBlazer so that
you can control who has which unbundled features (like FAX capability),
why not keep us all with up-to-date firmware.  Then we don't need to
call the support line with questions about problems that have already
been solved (saves you time), and I don't have to hunt down problems
with my system that are really caused by the modem (saves ME time)!

In short, sounds like the ZyXel was defective (can happen to any device),
and at least they did spend some time with you on the phone to help you
track down the problem.  My experiences with Telebit have been similar
to your's.  In fact, my experiences with almost all telephone support
people have been the same.  I sympathize with that person on the other
side of the phone -- after hearing problems all day which are probably
"pilot error" in most cases, it's hard to recognize when a "real" problem
comes along.

Sigh...
-- 
! Gil Kloepfer, Jr.
! gil@limbic.ssdl.com / ...!ames!limbic!gil
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Distribution: world
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 14:11:28 -0800
From: John_Rockman@f344.n202.z1.fidonet.org
Subject: ZyXEL 1496E for $310???
Comment-To: Steve_Pershing@f344.n202.z1.fidonet.org
Reply-To: John_Rockman@f344.n202.z1.fidonet.org
X-FSC-PATH: 202/344

 SP> At the price ZyXEL sells modems to us, we would be reselling at a
 SP> considerable loss if we sold them at $310.
 
Dealer price on the U-1496E is currently $299 quantity one.  It's less
in larger quantities.  The Questor.org price is not bad at ~13%
markup.
 
-John

--- Maximus/2 2.01wb
 * Origin: Penguin Lust (1:202/344)
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:19933 alt.security:5359
From: holland@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Rich Holland)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,alt.security
Subject: Re: Caller ID products?
Date: 24 Jan 1993 13:49:59 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen) writes:

>  And of course hunting for a random dialback time is likely to result
>in a nice trace of calls from a single number, which the telco probably
>could produce if motivated by a court order...

But "they" can't start tracing until they know they're being hacked.  And,
unless the law has changed, traces require court orders to begin with.  The
business being cracked doesn't have the power to trace the phone calls,
and the phone company won't (or shouldn't) do it and hand the offender 
over to them...

-- 
Rich Holland              | INTERNET: holland@matt.ksu.ksu.edu
100 Jardine Terr., Apt A7 | BITNET  : holland@ksuvm
Manhattan, KS  66502-3357 | UUCP    : ...!rutgers!matt.ksu.ksu.edu!holland
char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
From: sinan@carson.u.washington.edu (Sinan Karasu)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: USR modems..
Date: 22 Jan 93 01:50:40 GMT
Article-I.D.: shelley.1jnjtgINN9qn
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
NNTP-Posting-Host: carson.u.washington.edu

>
>Agreed.. I have a 14.4K Sportster modem, at it rocks.  I just dial, it handles
>all the rest.. negotiates the absolute best possible conditions for compression
>and data rate.. Helluva modem for $320..
>
>
>
>        +-----------------------------------------------------------+
>        |o|              I think, therefore I Amiga.              |=|
>        +-----------------------------------------------------------+
>        | Douglas Michael Kasten (DMK) | Amiga 2000HD/5 with a tiny |
>        |  dmkasten@redorc.chi.il.us   | little 21" Toshiba monitor.|
>        +------------------------------+----------------------------+

Yeah but does it answer?. Do this . If you have a Sportster 14.4
Then go to another telephone and dial your modem and let us all
know if it answered (1st ring? 2nd ring? Never? 1st ring and 
then Busy?)

Thanx
Sinan
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Can you lock DTE at 76,800 bps? Is that a valid speed?
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 93 14:48:23 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

larry@trauma.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:

> You are correct.  I indeed wish the USR would support a DTE of 115kbaud.  
> The v.fast upgrade will support this speed, but for some reason they didn't
> include support for it in the current production modem.

   I don't really see a serious need.  Even with the 16.8 kbps carrier, that 
accomodates almost 2.85:1 data compression, and it's 3.3:1 for a 14.4 kbps 
carrier.  Do you really send that many screensful of blank spaces that you 
need more than that?

   I suppuse that the point will someday be moot when we're all using 64 kbps 
ISDN devices with ethernet connections.  That should support up to 150:1 
compression. <grin>

> UUCP throughput (v.32bis/v.42bis) is maybe 5% faster on the USR verses
> the WB.  

   The low latency will help that a lot.  A UUCP-g packet has a maximum size 
of 71 bytes so a full 7 packet window has a maximum size of 497 bytes, or 
roughly 290 milliseconds on a 1700 CPS raw carrier.  Any latency higher than - 
or even close to - that figure is going to mean that the transmitter must stop 
while waiting for an ACK to arrive.

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: PEP
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 93 11:29:34 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

ee_hflo@uxmail.ust.hk (Michael Lo Ho Fung) writes:

> 	Please tell me what is "PEP" in the Telebit modem

   "PEP" stands for "Packetized Ensemble Protocol", the transport protocol 
used with Telebit's proprietary multicarrier modulation technique ("DAMQAM": 
Dynamically Adaptive Multicarrier Quadrature Amplitude Modulation).  Quite 
often "PEP" is used where "DAMQAM" would be technically correct but, in the 
case of Telebit modems, the two work hand in hand. 

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
From: tl@etek.chalmers.se (Torbj|rn Lindgren)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: scout+/16550/16550A ID
Date: 21 Jan 93 19:52:49 GMT
Organization: Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

>The difference between 16550 and 16550A seems to be somewhat subtle.
>Under DOS I have several programs which report a fifo chip.
>But: The FAS 2.10 serial driver for SysV 3.2 386 UNIXs reports an
>error. Unfortunately, I have no documentation about both 16550 and
>16550A. Even the 16550 has a fifo, which is reported by 386bsd,
>for example.

The difference between 16550 and 16550A is definitely NOT subtle. The
FIFO simply doesn't work correct in the 16550, and there is even is a
simple and documented method of detecting wich of them it is.

The difference between 16550A and 16550AF on the other hand is rather
subtle.
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:19794 biz.comp.telebit:1147
From: paul@eunet.co.at (Paul Gillingwater)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
Subject: Re: Anguish with T3000 settings
Date: 21 Jan 1993 21:47:55 +0100
Organization: EUnet EDV Dienstleistungs GmbH A-1010 Wien Austria
NNTP-Posting-Host: hp4at.eunet.co.at

In article <1jmq4gINN87c@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> daniel@cse.ucsc.edu (Daniel R. Edelson) writes:
>:i am getting a few critical comments for recommending the purchase of 5
>:T3000 modems because they're pigs to set up.  

>Have you disabled error correction and compression while trying
>to get this to work? I've found that the additional negociations
>consistently confuse dumber v.22bis modems. You indicated above

Yes, I tried that -- although the remote modems claim to support at
least MNP.  And previously I was able to connect with them.

>Also, be sure to lock the T3000 to V.22bis, rather than 
>negociating its entire protocol suite.

Yes, I tried this also.  No dice.  Thanks for your suggestions though!
-- 
Paul Gillingwater
Home system: paul@actrix.co.at (Waffle)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: williams@riogrande.cs.tcu.edu (Mark Williams)
Subject: Re: Mac to Modem Cable with RTS/CTS Handshake Pin
Organization: Texas Christian University
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 01:40:55 GMT

You can order one of those cables from MacConnection.  (800) 800-4444.

They should be $15.00  They
are called Mac+ to MNP Modem 6 foot.

I get them all the time.  Overnight shipping is $3.00.

					Mark Williams
					williams@riogrande.cs.tcu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: sasbge@unx.sas.com (Gantt Edmiston)
Subject: Re: Fax/Modem Software
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 03:48:09 GMT
Organization: SAS Institute Inc.

rob@sound.demon.co.uk (Robert J Barth) writes:

>What do we know about the merits of the various Fax Software around ?

>I'm sure there are more, but I'd like to hear from people who have used any
>(or all!) of these, and how you rate them, useability, features etc..

>Also, how much did you pay for them, and where from ?

>Ones I've heard of are :

>  QuickLink II     DOS  WIN3
>  BitFax           DOS  WIN3
>  MTEZ             DOS
>  Comit            DOS
>  ArchFax               WIN3
>  Eclipse SE            WIN3
>  Eclipse Pro/OCR       WIN3
>  WinFax Lite           WIN3
>  WinFax Pro            WIN3
>  DosFax           DOS

Never heard or used any that you list.  You didn't mention the
Intel FAXability software (DOS or WIN3).  I use it and it works
great.  They also have FAXability/OCR.  This receives the fax
document and optionally converts the FAX to a text file that you
can later edit and resend via FAX or print.

If you have access to a FAX machine, try using Intel's "FAXback"
service.  It's real neat.  Basically you dial an 800 number,
(800-525-3019) and follow the script and enter document numbers
via the touch-tone pad.  There are hundreds of documents that 
you can receive on any Intel product.

You need to have you local fax number handy before you call.
If you have a chance to try it out, ask for the following documents:

9010  FaxBACK Catalog
9000  Intel PC and LAN Enhancement Price List
9004  Fax and Modem Product Overview
9418  Intel FAXability Software Guide

You can only get five at a time and the catalog will give you
an idea of what's available.

BTW,  an addition feature of this free service:  Once you do get
your fax modem and fax software, you can use this service to *test*
the whole setup.  (ie, you don't have to have someone else fax you
stuff while you figure out the proper configurations).

If you want to learn more about the FAXback product itself, you can
call 1-800-FAX-BACK and get info sent to you the same way.


--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gantt Edmiston - SysAdmin     o | If you always do  what you've always done,
SAS Institute Inc.          <(  | you'll always get what you've always got.
Quality Assurance - V416     [\.+--------------------------------------------
Cary NC 27513 919-677-8000 x6091|            sasbge@unx.sas.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: chan@spot.Colorado.EDU (Space Kadett)
Subject: ZyXel & FAXstf problems
Summary: Trouble receiving fax with ZyXEL,FAXstf setup.
Keywords: modems,ZyXel,FAXstf
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 08:21:47 GMT

I have a ZyXEL U-1496E with 5.05 ROMs linked to a Macintosh IIfx running
FAXstf software.  I was able to send faxes with it ok, but  I have a problem
when I receive faxes from other fax modems and fax machines.  The 
modem picks up the call and the fax status screen appears for about half a
minute and then the software stops the transmission and reports an
unsuccessful fax transmission error.  
 
Has anyone had a similar problem?  I would appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance.  You can post your responses on this newsgroup, but I
prefer if you email me.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger)
Subject: Re: Problems connecting to a Telebit
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:36:28 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: MCSNet, Chicago, IL

In article <XeFqXB1w165w@connect.com> root@connect.com (Niles Mills) writes:
>Ditto.  Can only get a V.32 connection, not V.32bis, when connecting
>a Viva 14.4/FAX to a Telebit T3000.  Have tried every combination known
>to man (only a slight exaggeration). <g>
>
>Would be interested in hearing from someone who's successfully V.32bis'd
>a T3000.

Several thousand times, using T3000s, Supras, UDS Fasttalk 32bxs, and ZyXELs.

--
Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
Data Line: [+1 312 248-0900]
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:20029 misc.forsale:36419 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:37207
From: kruckenb%peruvian.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Joseph Kruckenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,misc.forsale,na.forsale,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Crosstalk for Windows for sale
Date: 27 Jan 93 14:58:03 GMT
Organization: University of Utah Computer Science

I've got an unused (but opened) copy of Crosstalk for Windows with
manuals, etc available.  I'd like to get $60.00 for it, but make an
offer and I'll consider it.

Please respond by mail to kruckenb@peruvian.cs.utah.edu.

Thanks.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: wolfgang@netcom.com (Wolfgang Henke)
Subject: Re: Shared Fax Modem on Novell Network
Organization: Netcom
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:23:20 GMT

Chuck Fisher (fisher@ncselxsi.uucp) wrote:
: Can anyone recommend a modem/software combination that would allow
: faxes to be sent and received from a Novell server?  The software
: should be able to image ASCII text and also HP LaserJet type of print
: files.  I suppose that any modem that handles fax would be
: appropriate, it's the software that's the tricky part.  Thanks for any
: recommendations or experience you can relate.

You might want to check out FaxWorks LAN from SofNet. Its supposed
to work with 'virtually any PC-based LAN'. It should work both with
ASCII and HP-PCL. Its also compatible with Digicom Scout+ modems.



-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
   Wolfgang Henke     Data lanes not car pool lanes      wolfgang@netcom.com 

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: a2niekre@rzdspc31.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Oliver Niekrenz)
Subject: ZyXEL request
Organization: University of Hamburg, FRG
Date: 21 Jan 93 16:32:31 GMT

In a magazine i found an add for Zyxel modems. I decided to buy me a modem
(as soon as i am rich enough) but i was wondering about a few abbreviations.
Could anybody explain me the meaning  (of life :-) )
of CELP and the differences between the E,B und Plus modems (and don`t tell
me it`s only the prize)

I would be very thankful.

snailmail : Oliver Niekrenz, Buxtehuder Str.66, 2154 Apensen, Germany
email     : a2niekre@rzdspc2.informatik.uni-hamburg.de

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: louis@cpd.Tandem.COM (Louis Meadows)
Subject: ARC:Interkey/Intershake Manual wanted
Organization: Tandem Computers Inc., Cupertino CA
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:50:22 GMT


 Hi,

If you know the Alantic Research Intershake and Interkey please send
me E-mail.   

   Louis
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: cma@eniac.inesc.pt (Carlos Antunes)
Subject: Re: Zoom VFX v.32-bis eprom upgrades
Organization: INESC - Inst. Eng. Sistemas e Computadores, LISBOA. PORTUGAL.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 10:35:28 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.005419.8455@sj.ate.slb.com> poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger) writes:
>
>I wonder if they would be willing to make to code avaialble in binary form
>so that those of use with EPROM burning capabilities could make their own.
>

They won't! This new ROM is considered an enhancement, hence, it will
cost money ($10). BTW, the enhancement is auto fallback/forward.

Regards,
Carlos Antunes.

-- 
Carlos Antunes @ INESC - Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores
E-mail to cma@inesc.pt
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Can you lock DTE at 76,800 bps?  Is that a valid speed?
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 21:57:44 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

tl@etek.chalmers.se (Torbj|rn Lindgren) writes:

> First you have to find a modem that is able to output characters to
> the serial-port at that kind of speeds, and that isn`t going to be
> easy. I haven`t single highspeed modem that is able to do that, and
> that includes all modem built by USR.

   USR may make fine modems, but don't assume that they're tops in any 
particular category!  In particular, the fact that USR's top DTE speed is 
57600 bps doesn't mean that there aren't any faster DTEs.  If I remember 
correctly, Telebit's WorldBlazer will speak 115200 bps, though I'd normally be 
the first to comment that it's drastic overkill.

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: amcandel@eos.ncsu.edu (ALEJANDRO M CANDELARIA)
Subject: Re: *** what's so good about zyxel modems? ***
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 01:14:51 GMT
From: miss059@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Rich Bainter)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: BOCA lockups
Date: 21 Jan 1993 07:38:30 -0600
Organization: Pug's Pub and Pleasure Palace
NNTP-Posting-Host: uxa.ecn.bgu.edu

In article <1993Jan20.190536.2798@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> bfrost@nyx.cs.du.edu (Bonnell Frost) writes:
>Since I put the new 1.27 ROMs in my BOCA 1440i modem just afer Christmas
>I have had a frequent problem with lockups.  Here the modem, while either
>dialing or initial negotiation, starts to emit a constant tone (one of the
>negotation signals) then refuses to do anything else until I cold-boot.
>My system is a 386SX, and it is not locked, just the modem.  While I have
>seen lockups like this before changing the ROMs, it has been much worse 
>since Christmas.  BOCA tech support does not seem to know about this.
>Has anyone else had similar problems?

Well I haven't put my ROM upgrade in since it hasn't arrived yet. I have
this same problem with the old ROM and I've only noticed it if it's
unable to connect to a site. This was the main reason I ordered the ROM
upgrade. Before I moved into my current house in January I never had a
problem connecting, but the phone lines here are terrible and I need to
rerun them. I guess I need to call BOCA tech support about this problem
so they have more documentation and MIGHT look into it.

Ciao,


-- 
Richard Bainter          Mundanely     |       "Teachers are supposed to
Phelim Utred Gervas      Society       |        teach you *HOW* to learn 
Pug                      Generally     |        not *WHAT* to learn."   
  miss059@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu  |  pug@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu  |  pug@wixer.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: frechett@spot.Colorado.EDU (-=Runaway Daemon=-)
Subject: Re: why does sz break ?
Keywords: help 
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:02:42 GMT


It's the Zyplex terminal server.  It's flow control tends to interferr
with just about everything except kermit.  We've managed to get zmodem
to work some of the time but most people complain of very low throughput.
I'm sure we could fix it by setting 'passthru' on the Zyplex and making
sure all flow control was off, but they don't allow us access to the 
Zyplex once the connection has been established.  Don't make this mistake
as it's terribly useful to be able to turn flow control off.

	ian
From: mutrh@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Todd R. Haverstock)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: USR Upgrade: To do or not to do...
Date: 28 Jan 1993 13:21:06 -0600
Organization: Educational Computing Network
NNTP-Posting-Host: uxa.ecn.bgu.edu

I have one of the older HST 14.4's (with the round LEDS on the front) and
would like to upgrade.  I spoke with USR and they said there's a rom upgrade
where I can add v.32 (bis I think they said).  She also said there's a trade
in program they'll be starting in 3-6 months and I can get a DS 16.8k w/fax
for $349.  Which should I go for?  And considering USR's past, could the
3-6 month span turn into 6-12 months?  

Todd R. Haverstock
mutrh@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
mutrh@ecnuxa.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: How to use modem to dial voice phone from UNIX
From: flinton@eagle.wesleyan.edu
Date: 22 Jan 93 21:05:42 EST
Organization: Wesleyan University

In article <CJB.93Jan22164757@tulip.cs.uq.oz.au>, cjb@cs.uq.oz.au (Christopher 
J Biggs) writes:
> 	
>    How would one go about getting a HAYES modem to dial a voice connection
> 
send it the following string (where xxx yyyy is the phone number you want): 

ATD xxx yyyy ;

the closing semicolon is essential (the modem wil dial, and respond  "OK" , 
and hold the line open so you can pick up the handset when you're ready).

When the call is over, replace the handset and send the modem the string

ATH           (or  ATH0 , if your modem prefers)

and the modem vacates the line (hangs up).
> --
>  Christopher J Biggs   cjb@cs.uq.oz.au   | "You can have peace.  Or you can  
>  Department of Computer Science,         | have freedom.  Don't ever count on 
>  The University of Queensland, Australia | having both at once."--Lazarus Long 
> ------------veni vidi nuclei deceiri - I came, I saw, I dumped core------------

Fred E.J. Linton  Wesleyan U. Math. Dept.  649 Sci. Tower  Middletown, CT 06459
E-mail:  <FLINTON@eagle.Wesleyan.EDU>     ( or  <fejlinton@{att|mci}mail.com> )
Tel.:         + 1 203 776 2210 (home)      or     + 1 203 347 9411 x2249 (work)
From: loki.trickster@digund.uucp (Loki Trickster) 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: 16550/A chip sources?
Date: 27 Jan 93 16:19:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Digital Underground - PRIVATE
Reply-To: loki.trickster@digund.uucp (Loki Trickster) 

SP>Not cheap, but I have them here at $12 each.

This post concerned UARTs - 16550AFN's, to be more precise.

Where exactly *IS* "here"?

Loki the Mercantile Trickster
---
 . QMPro 1.0 41-2003 . All I want is a little more than I'll ever get!
                                                                                                                                             
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.mac.comm