HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pat@wrs.com (Patrick Boylan)
Subject: 000 Wind River Ski Trip 000
Summary: moguls
Keywords: ski ski ski ski ski
Reply-To: pat@wrs.com
Organization: Wind River Systems
Distribution: ba
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:08:39 GMT

Some Wind River folk are planning a weekend ski trip to South Tahoe 
(leaving Alameda March 12).

The plan is to charter a bus for the weekend.  Accomodations are at 
fairly large condos (sleep 10).  Cost depends on the number of people.
For 30 - 40 people, the cost should be roughly as follows :

Bus + accomodations: ~ $120
Heavenly valley 2 days: $78

It is NOT limited to just Wind River Systems so if anyone is interested in 
coming along, drop a note.

Space is limited.

Reply to pat@wrs.com or nigel@wrs.com.

See ya there,
Patrick

-- 
 Patrick Boylan, - Wind River Systems, Alameda, CA - pat@wrs.com
From: miller@isrc.sandia.gov (Dave Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: Looking for VME-based encoder board that works under VxWorks
Date: 25 Jan 93 15:58:42 GMT
Organization: Sandia National Labs, Org. 1600, Albq., NM

I am interested in interfacing a CNC machine to a VME bus in order to
implement joint position feedback from the CNC controller.  4 of the 5
axes on my CNC have encoders with relatively easy access to their signals.
I am looking for a VME encoder board which can be programmed to receive
these signals and convert them into X, Y, Z, A, and B values.  Has anyone
had any experience using this type of interface or recommendations for a
vendor which supplies a suitable interface board ?

Thanks

Dave Miller
miller@isrc.sandia.gov
From: thoff@netxwest.com (Todd Hoff)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: re: comp.os.vxworks newsdigest
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 10:13:48 PST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov

Thanx. I received several pings, but yours sounds the shortest.
From: jagski@slug.ssc.gov (Michael Jagieski)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: VxWorks scsiLib Questions (MVME147, MVME167)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 09:51:56 CST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov

----------
X-Sun-Data-Type: text
X-Sun-Data-Description: text
X-Sun-Data-Name: text
X-Sun-Content-Lines: 0

----------
X-Sun-Data-Type: default
X-Sun-Data-Description: default
X-Sun-Data-Name: help.vx
X-Sun-Content-Lines: 32


Hello,

I am trying to use the VxWorks scsiLib on a MVME147 and a MVME167.
The device I'm trying to communicate with is a SCSI CAMAC crate
controller. I have been successful in using the scsiIoctl routine
to read and write a fixed amount of data.

HOWEVER when the data that I am reading is variable, I get an error
status (= 0x1f) on the MVME147 and the task hangs on the MVME167
waiting for a semaphore release. Somehow I think you are suppose to
use the addLengthByte variable in the SCSI_TRANSACTION structure.

Other problems is that auto-configuring works great for both boards
but when one hard codes the call to scsiPhysDevCreate() the hook
up appears normal but as soon as I try to access the device the
task hangs like above on the MVME167. (This works fine on the MVME147).

Also, the status I get back from this device is only suppose to be
0 or 2 yet I get 0, 2, or 4 from the MVME167 and 0, 0x82, 0x84 and
0x1f from the MVME147.

I have noticed with time measurements that the MVME147 SCSI controller
is 10 times slower than the MVME167. Issuing a simple command to this
device takes 150 microseconds on the MVME167 but 1.50 milliseconds on
the MVME147. Is this because a layer of SCSI firmware exists on the 
MVME147 ?

Finally can one issue SCSI Messages in VxWorks besides SCSI Commands ?

I would appreciate any help, thanks!
jagski@slug.ssc.gov
From: thoff@netxwest.com (Todd Hoff)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: ping command available?
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 93 13:54:42 PST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov

Does anyone have a ping program, similar to Sun's, available under vxWorks?

Thanx for any help.
From: peter@fibertek.com (Peter H. Stern)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: Synergy SV420 board
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 09:16:26 EST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov

Hello. I am considering using a Synergy SV420 dual-68040 board with VxWorks
running on both processors.  I was wondering if anyone out there has ever
used VxWorks with one of these boards and how well it worked out. I am
curious about how useful 2 processors are in an I/O intensive application.

Please post or contact peter@fibertek.com, (703) 471-7671.  Thanks.
From: tweadon@sadira.gb.nrao.edu (TIM WEADON)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: MC68230 PI/T Software driver
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 10:22:41 EST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov

I'm looking for a software driver for the MC68230 chip. Actually for
the Motorola MV340B card. Does anyone out there have something I could
use or at least start from?

Thanks in advance.
Tim Weadon
P.O. Box 2
Green Bank, WV. 24944
(304) 456-2120
From: johnch@test22.sun.com (Sam the Skank from Geezer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: X ported to vxworks?
Date: 22 Jan 93 16:28:30
Organization: Impossible Missions Force
Distribution: comp
NNTP-Posting-Host: test22

Has anyone ported X to vxworks, or tried?  If so, how did it go?

-- John C
From: Mike Trest <trest@visicom.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: re: comp.os.vxworks newsdigest
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 8:53:00 PST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov

> Jeff Price
> 
> Does anyone know of a lightweight database system that runs under VxWorks ?
> A simple quasi-relational model system, or ISAM would be best. I do not 
> need (nor expect) a full-blown rdb such as Oracle or Ingres.

Jeff,

I would acquire C-ISAM for the PC which is available in source format.
Several years ago I ported the code to several UNIX platforms and 
modified for custom DBMS use.  It should port easily to vxWorks.

..mike..

====================================================
Mike Trest                      trest@visicom.com
Senior Engineer                 Voice: 619 457 2111
Technology Group                Fax:   619 457 0888
VisiCom Laboratories            San Diego, CA 
====================================================
From: Mike Trest <trest@visicom.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: re: comp.os.vxworks newsdigest
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 9:17:12 PST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov

> 
> Has anyone ported X to vxworks, or tried?  If so, how did it go?
> 
> - -- John C

John,

VisiCom Laboratories did this about 2 years ago. X and MOTIF
standard distributions are available for X11R4 and X11R5 (soon).
Since we had done several previous port of X the move to
vxWorks was relatively easy.  The main problems were in the
"environmental assumptions about UNIX" which implicit in
the prototype code from MIT and OSF. 

Now, the product uses client code which is written for any
level of X  (Xlib,Xtoolkit,Athena,MOTIF) and will handle
code generated by most of the GUI builders.

It is in use by several hardware OEMs for use in their custom
products.   It is available now for 68K, SPARC targets.

It has a full X server implementation as well as support for
several different hardware display adapters.

If you need additional information please EMAIL Mr. Gene Kennon
at:  gene_kennon@visicom.com


====================================================
Mike Trest                      trest@visicom.com
Senior Engineer                 Voice: 619 457 2111
Technology Group                Fax:   619 457 0888
VisiCom Laboratories            San Diego, CA 
====================================================
From: stan@rti.com (Stan Schneider)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: re: comp.os.vxworks newsdigest
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 15:01:08 PST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov

>> Date: 25 Jan 93 15:58:42 GMT
>> From: miller@isrc.sandia.gov (Dave Miller)
>> 
>> I am interested in interfacing a CNC machine to a VME bus in order to
>> implement joint position feedback from the CNC controller.  4 of the 5
>> axes on my CNC have encoders with relatively easy access to their signals.
>> I am looking for a VME encoder board which can be programmed to receive
>> these signals and convert them into X, Y, Z, A, and B values.  Has anyone
>> had any experience using this type of interface or recommendations for a
>> vendor which supplies a suitable interface board ?
>> 

We've used some boards by Whedco in Ann Arbor with good results.  We have
VxWorks drivers for the Whedco 3570 board available.  Drop me a line if you're
interested.

        -- Stan


===============================================================================
=                                           =                                 =
=   Stan Schneider                          =   email: stan@rti.com           =
=   Real-Time Innovations, Inc.             =   Phone: (408) 720-8312         =
=   954 Aster, Sunnyvale, CA 94086          =   Fax:   (408) 720-8419         =
=                                           =                                 =
===============================================================================
From: ajm@wilson.fibercom.com (AJ Madison)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: Re: ppp or cslip implementation for VxWorks
Summary: Me Too.
Keywords: ppp, cslip, VxWorks
Date: 26 Jan 93 18:32:39 GMT

In article <1993Jan20.224924.25888@leland.Stanford.EDU>, lazarus@leland.Stanford.EDU (Howard Wang) writes:
> Hi,
>    Does anyone know of a PPP or cslip implementation for VxWorks?
> I know that slip is released as a driver with VxWorks, but I need
> to run ip stuff over a slow (5000 bps) link.  So I'd like to try
> ppp (or cslip, ppp prefered).
> 
>    I may try to tackle this myself if nobody has before.
> 
>    Any help would be appreciated!  Thanks!
> 

I'm not particularly fond of Me Too postings.  However, on the off
chance that any responses to Howard's request were all over e-mail, I
also am interested in a vxworks PPP.  

Also, to open things up a bit, has anyone ported one of the PD versions
of PPP to a VxWorks environment?  I have copies of the original ppp,
ppp-1.1, and dp-2.2, so if the comments are terse portation notes, I'd
be more than willing to take a look anyway.

I'm definitely doing a PPP, but depending upon how things work out, it
may not necessarily be VxWorks.
-- 
A.J. Madison                       PHONE: (703) 342-6700 X383
FiberCom, Inc.                       FAX: (703) 342-5961
P.O. Box 11966                  INTERNET: ajm@fibercom.com
Roanoke, VA  24022-1966             UUCP: ...!uunet!fibercom!ajm
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
From: dwilliam@pizza.ess.harris.com (Dave Williams)
Subject: Newer GCC?
Keywords: vxWorks 5.0.3
Organization: Harris Corporation - ISD
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:11:08 GMT

   Here's a question for WRS - what version of the GCC compiler are you
planning on releasing with the newest release of VxWorks?  I noticed a 
few days back that the latest and greatest is up to 2.3.3.  Any plans?

   (We really want to use some of the neat C++ - comments (//) that
the new GCC includes)


--
Dave Williams                                   | "What time is it?" "9:00AM"
 dwilliam@jabba.ess.harris.com                  | "What day?"        "Monday"
  "Huh?  What?  Could you repeat the question?" | "Go away.  Try me Tuesday"
    <mumble mumble> opinions <mumble mumble> mine <mumble mumble mumble>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
From: mkb@cs.cmu.edu (Mike Blackwell)
Subject: Distributed communications packages
Reply-To: mkb@cs.cmu.edu
Organization: Field Robotics Center, CMU
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 20:28:16 GMT


I'm looking for *commercially supported* packages that allow
communications between distributed processes running a mixture of
VxWorks boxes and Sun workstations. Right now we're using CMU's
TCA/TCX, but our client (NASA) is worried about long term support. I
have a description of Sparta's ARTSE executive, which sounds like it
would do the trick. Can anyone comment on their experiences with it?
Are there any other packages out there?

		thanks!   Mike Blackwell	mkb@cs.cmu.edu
From: hjb@netcom.com (H. J. Bae)
Subject: Re: ping command available?
Organization: Peaceful Star Project
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 16:23:27 GMT

In article <9301202154.AA10021@cinnabar.netx.com> thoff@netxwest.com (Todd Hoff) writes:
>Does anyone have a ping program, similar to Sun's, available under vxWorks?

not that i know of.  it's easy to write one though.  or you can port
the guts of code from  unix ping that opens a raw socket to write icmp
echo packets.  or, you can just allocate an mbuf, fill in the ip and
icmp stuff into it and pass it to icmp_send() routine directly (less
lines of code, no sockets)

hwajin




-- 
Hwa-Jin Bae
Peaceful Star Project
2899 Ford St., Oakland CA 94601	
hjb@netcom.com  (510) 536-7607
From: interf!atlas!athena!buchanan@uunet.uu.net (Keith Buchanan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: Distributed communications packages
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 19:59:25 EST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov

We use ARTSE at the Naval Observatory in the Optical Interferometer Project.
We have a distributed control system with Themis 680x0 CPUs, Heurikon 680x0
CPUs and SUN 3 & 4 workstations.  ARTSE has performed well for us not only
for network communications but for process control, startup etc.  Mike Anderson
et al at Sparta have been most helpful with any questions we have posed.
I would recommend the product and the company supporting it to my own brother.
Anyone requiring a more in depth commentary, please contact me via e-mail at
buchanan@interf.com.  If there is considerable traffic, I will post it to
the exploder.

Keith Buchanan
Interferometrics, Inc.
8150 Leesburg Pike
Vieena, VA  22182-2799
From: Chatterjee S <fwr8bv@fin.af.mil>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vxworks
Subject: Motorola MVME-332 Driver
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 18:41:41 CST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.112.16
Originator: daemon@vxw.ee.lbl.gov

Does anyone have a vxWorks (5.0) driver for the Mototola MVME-332 (which
is an "Intelligent Communications Controller" for serial comm.)?  We are
using it (4 of the 8 ports available) to interface to 4 Gulton digital
strip-chart recorders.

Thanks,
Shash.


+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ Shash Chatterjee                               EMAIL:  fwr8bv@fin.af.mil    +
+ EC Software                                   PHONE:  (817) 763-1495        +
+ General Dynamics, Ft. Worth Div.             FAX:    (817) 777-2115         +
+ P.O. Box 748, MZ1719                                                        +
+ Ft. Worth, TX 76101                                                         +
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: hjb@netcom.com (H. J. Bae)
Subject: Re: Mysterious task crashes
Organization: Peaceful Star Project
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 06:28:47 GMT

markm@ee.ubc.ca (mark milligan) writes:

>It looks like the pointer is writing an instruction to jump to location 0x0006
>where the illegal instruction is generated. ( I beleive this is the vector table?)

m68k's look for SSP and PC values (in that sequence) starting at addr 0
upon powerup.  0x6 is pointing to least significant half of whatever was
left there (possibly the kernel boot routine address).

if i were you, i'd use a logic analyser to trigger at that address to
track the problem down.  if you don't have one of those, you could 
possibly hack up something -- like putting in a jsr instruction at 
the location to call your routine which can print out stack trace...
or something like that (i know, pretty sick) <grin>


hwajin


-- 
Hwa-Jin Bae				hjb@netcom.com
Peaceful Star Project
2899 Ford Street, Oakland CA 94601	Available for Civilian contract work.
(510) 536-7607
From: cardeira@loria.crin.fr (Cardeira Carlos)
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: what means the initials CP/M ?
Date: 27 Jan 93 14:10:57 GMT
Organization: CRIN (CNRS) Nancy - INRIA Lorraine


Can anyone tell me what exactely means the initials CP/M
(Control Process/Machine ?)
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
From: winslade@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Winslade)
Subject: Re: 8080/8085/Z80 Code Identifier
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 22:17:12 GMT

alpha@waggen.twuug.com (Joe Wright) writes:

>: Not that it'd be hard to write, but does anybody have some code you
>: can feed a random .COM file to and have it tell you whether or not it's
>: pure 8080, 8085, or Z80 code ?

>I don't suppose so.  You can run the target code through a disassembler
>and see what you get.  If you are sure you are in code and see JR to
>a reasonable address, it's Z80 code.  If you see only JP (JMP) instructions
>is is probably 8080 code.  8085 is identical to 8080 code except for
>the SIM/RIM instructions (8085).  Most CP/M applications are written
>in 8080 code so as to function equally well on 8080/8085/Z80 cpu's.

There's a trick I SORTA remember which uses the Z80's additional overflow
capability of the parity flag.  I can't remember the specifics, but 
trying this on an 8080/8085 and a Z80 will yield different results.
 
 MVI A,80H
 SUI 81H        ;; force an overflow
 JPO WHATEVER

If I remember correctly, the parity flag will be set on one and clear on
the other, but I cannot remember offhand which one it is.
 
Good day       JSW

Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
From: aduncan@rhea.trl.OZ.AU (Allan Duncan)
Subject: Re: Did AZTEC C V1.05g produce 8080 or Z80 ?
Organization: Telecom Research Labs, Melbourne, Australia
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 05:16:24 GMT

From article <1jp8p7INNb29@tamsun.tamu.edu>, by jdb8042@tamuts.tamu.edu (John Donald Baker):
> Well, I have Aztec C 1.06d and I have two versions of the compiler.
> 
>      'CC' generates 8080 code only
>      'CZ' generates Z80 code in 'extended Intel' format
> 
> As someone once pointed out, the Z80 compiler really doesn't take full
> advantage of the Z80's instruction set.  I ran a small program through
> both and didn't see any difference in the output.

The IX and IY registers are used in certain cases, the nmemonics are
generated with DEFB's, so that they pass through an 8080 assembler.
 
> Besides, the library routines would have to all be in 8080 code anyway.

Only if you didn't redo them in Z80 :-)
 
Allan Duncan		ACSnet	 a.duncan@trl.oz
(+613) 253 6708		Internet a.duncan@trl.oz.au
Fax    253 6664		UUCP	 {uunet,hplabs,ukc}!munnari!trl.oz.au!a.duncan
    Telecom Research Labs, PO Box 249, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
From: sillywiz@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (SillyWiz)
Subject: CPM and MSDOS - disk copying.
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:49:50 GMT

Two questions..

1) Does anyone know where I can FTP a program to modify my CPM to let
me read MSDOS 720k discs in my B: drive ? .. Tech Stuff: I'm using CPM
PLUS on an Amstrad CPC6128 plus. I have 61k TPA available. The thing
doesn't have to do anything fancy - just let me copy files across to
my "ordinary" 170k A: drive.

2) (Probably a FAQ - if so, sorry) Does anyone have a full list of CPM
system calls .. I have the simpler ones like printing chars etc but
not anything more complex - please don't say RTFM..ever seen Amstrads
CPM documentation ? ... 144pages of license and 5pages about how to
put discs in the drives..:-)


                    Thanks for any help, SillyWiz.

(.sig down for PMing)
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for your attention,no offence intended, I apologise in advance in case.
   --=|| sillywiz@dcs.warwick.ac.uk.the.earth.milky.way.the.universe ||=--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
From: wilker@hopf.math.purdue.edu (Clarence Wilkerson)
Subject: Re: 8080/8085/Z80 Code Identifier
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:04:47 GMT

Jay, where can the DSD (Dynamic Screen Debugger) be obtained?

-- 
Clarence Wilkerson      \ Bitnet:       wilker%math.purdue.edu@purccvm
Prof. of Math. (topology)\ Internet:    wilker@math.purdue.edu
Dept. of Mathematics      \ messages:   (317) 494-1903, FAX 494-0548
Purdue University,         \ office:    (317) 494-1955 (voice/modem)
W. Lafayette, Indiana 47907 \
From: rush@mnementh.metaphor.com (Ed Rush)
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: Newsletter wants CP/M users
Date: 26 Jan 93 05:28:28 GMT
Organization: Metaphor Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA


David McGlone publishes the "Z-Letter" for CP/M and Z-system users.
He needs more subscribers to qualify for a Post Office bulk-mailing
permit.  To inquire about this informative, monthly publication, contact
David McGlone, 149 W. Hilliard Lane, Eugene, OR 97404-3057,
telephone 503-588-3563.

I (the poster) am not David, but I will forward any e-mailed replies
to him in Oregon.
-- 
  ------------------------------------------------------
  | Ed Rush, not speaking for Metaphor, Mtn. View, CA  |
  |  UUCP: [...!{apple|decwrl}!]metaphor!rush          |
  |  Internet: rush@metaphor.com                       |
  | My Macintosh doesn't go out in the rain.           |
  | Palace of Fine Cows: Section 126, Row B, Seats 1-2 |
  ------------------------------------------------------
From: Susan.Fawley@f1066.n374.z1.fidonet.org (Susan Fawley)
Sender: postmaster@eilc.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: QX-10 Question Answered
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:53:00 -0500

Thanks for the INPUT, in a previous message I was told that the present setting is the proper settings, any thing else will couse the machine not to boot.

 * Origin: The Shire Scribe BBS: 1:374/1066@fidonet.org (1:374/1066)
From: bozze@piraya.bad.se (Bo Arnoldson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: Manx Software Systems Inc
Keywords: Manx
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 18:01:59 -0100
Reply-To: BoA@bad.se
Organization: B.A.D., Stockholm, Sweden

Hi all!

Does anyone know if the Manx Software System inc still lives somewhere.
Perhaps they have an email address.
I bought their Cross compilers for MSDOS and CPM 6 months ago.
I tried to fax to their fax-no 9085428, but I have not received any answers.

My problem is anyhow related to converting doubles to floats.
This problem only occurs with the C80 compiler.

 (float) (double) 6.2000 --> 6.199(...)
 (float) (double) 1234.5678 --> 1234.566(...)
 (float) (double) 300.2 --> 300.1992(...)

Perhaps this has to do with the FLT80 assembler library.

Compiler versions is anyhow:
  Aztec C80 Pass1 v4.10b 10-3-88 (C) 1982-1988 by Manx Software Systems, Inc.
  Aztec C80 Pass2 v4.10b 1-11-90
  Aztec AS80 v4.10b 5-9-88
  
Regards,

-- 
Bo Arnoldson, BoA@bad.se, 3C-BBS-tel: 08-724 95 34.

Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
From: cwr@crash.cts.com (Will Rose)
Subject: Re: Epson QX-10 Question
Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA
Date: 21 Jan 93 11:35:28 PST

Clifford Fawley (Clifford.Fawley@f1066.n374.z1.fidonet.org) wrote:
: On the back of the Epson QX-10 there is a set of DIP Switches. 

I don't know the default settings, but the switches are buffered
straight onto the data bus, and appear when you read I/O port 18H.
After that it's all down to the software...

Hope this help - Will
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm