HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ij59@vaxb.acs.unt.edu
Subject: Re: problems with Times' Arrow prt. 2
Organization: University of North Texas
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 04:39:22 GMT

In article <1992Sep27.140409.477@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, ehamrick@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Eric N Hamrick) writes:
>>Actually, if you want to take it further, they saw the possibility
>>of an extended visit, and Picard decided to turn all these fine
>>StarFleet officers into actors in a production of Shakespeare
>>for the locals to raise the funds needed to build a temporal-shift
>>device... :)
>>
>      Heck, they have worlds greatest card-shark in the group,Data, so why
>  worry about a play? :)
> 
>   -Eric

Hey...you're right!  Data was rich!  The whole business about the rent
was totally unecessary the second time.  That was just a straight screw-up
in the script.

 ________    _______              _         ________     ____
|______  |  |_____  |            | |       |________|   |____|
      / /         | |  _  _   _  |  \       ________    ______   _______
     /  \         | | |_||_| / / |   \     |________|  |____  | |_______|
    / /\ \   _____| |   ____/ /  | |\ \     ________       / /
   /_/  \_\ |_______|  |_____/   |_| \/    |________|     /_/
 
        |  Nippon no anime wa ichi-ban desu!  Otaku rule!    |
        |      Hey, man, I _like_ Robotech.  So sue me.      |
        | Sukotto Miraa/Scott Miller (ij59@vaxb.acs.unt.edu) |

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: dfried@darwin.genetics.washington.edu (David Friedman)
Subject: Re: Time-loop flaw in Time's Arrow II
Organization: University of Washington   
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 20:00:05 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.184234.28750@tin.monsanto.com> lesnyd@monsanto.com (Larry E. Snyder) writes:
>In article <1992Oct2.164427.20584@nmsu.edu>, ssubrama@dante.nmsu.edu (SUBRAMANIAM) writes:
>> 
>> Hi netters,
>> 	Has anyone noticed a flaw in Time's Arrow II.  When Samuel Clemens
>> comes to the enterprise, he sees his watch and someone (I think Geordi) tells
>> him that they found it in the cavern along with data's head.  That means
>> that the watch is 500+ years old.  Clemens takes the watch goes back to the
>> 19th century and leaves it in the cave.  That means the watch would be 1000+
>> years old in the next loop. That cannot happen.  If everything happened as I
>> have mentioned here in TA II, then the flaw is present.  Can someone confirm
>> my observation or am I wrong in perceiving the events.
>
>No, Clemens took the 500-year-old watch back, but left his then-new watch in
>the cavern when he realized he already had one in his pocket (the old one).
>Hmmm - I wonder what would have happened if he decided to test "fate" and
>take BOTH watches with him when he left the cavern...would the old one
>disappear, since it was never there?
>
>
>> 
>> Siva
>> email: ssubrama@dante.nmsu.edu
>> 
>> 
>> 

According to your theory, Clemens has never lost his watch.
However, I seem to remember his exclaiming something about
finding his lost watch on the Enterprise.
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Jean Luc EXPLOITS android labor!!!!
Date: 29 Sep 92 01:20:45 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Sep27.172051.20445@umbc3.umbc.edu>, cs202144@umbc8.umbc.edu (cs202144) writes:

> Well I have to admit that you are right in a way. 

Of course I'm right!  I'm ALWAYS RIGHT! ;-)  Actually, please disregard my
previous posting.  My accounting was broken into by Lore! ;-)

You make an excellent point.  When are they going to promote Data?  They guy's
a regular work-a-holic!  He's not gotten laid since the second episode and
then Tasha blew him off when she sobered up!  Sheesh!  It would have been much
more convincing if Tasha would have said "Oh, Data, could you stop by my
quarters after oh-six-hundred-hours" rather than "I'm only going to say this
once!  IT NEVER HAPPENED!".  Double Sheesh!

Promote Data or at least let him get laid.  Why does RIKER get all the women?
Even POD-INSEMINATORS fer pity sakes!

Terry
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Time-loop flaw in Time's Arrow II
From: lrfrederick@ualr.edu
Date: 3 Oct 92 13:13:02 GMT
Organization: University of Arkansas at Little Rock

In article <1992Oct2.200005.12162@u.washington.edu>, dfried@darwin.genetics.washington.edu (David Friedman) writes:
> In article <1992Oct2.184234.28750@tin.monsanto.com> lesnyd@monsanto.com (Larry E. Snyder) writes:
>>In article <1992Oct2.164427.20584@nmsu.edu>, ssubrama@dante.nmsu.edu (SUBRAMANIAM) writes:
>>> 
>>> Hi netters,
>>> 	Has anyone noticed a flaw in Time's Arrow II.  When Samuel Clemens
>>> comes to the enterprise, he sees his watch and someone (I think Geordi) tells
>>> him that they found it in the cavern along with data's head.  That means
>>> that the watch is 500+ years old.  Clemens takes the watch goes back to the
>>> 19th century and leaves it in the cave.  That means the watch would be 1000+
>>> years old in the next loop. That cannot happen.  If everything happened as I
>>> have mentioned here in TA II, then the flaw is present.  Can someone confirm
>>> my observation or am I wrong in perceiving the events.
>>
>>No, Clemens took the 500-year-old watch back, but left his then-new watch in
>>the cavern when he realized he already had one in his pocket (the old one).
>>Hmmm - I wonder what would have happened if he decided to test "fate" and
>>take BOTH watches with him when he left the cavern...would the old one
>>disappear, since it was never there?
>>
>>
>>> 
>>> Siva
>>> email: ssubrama@dante.nmsu.edu
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> According to your theory, Clemens has never lost his watch.
> However, I seem to remember his exclaiming something about
> finding his lost watch on the Enterprise.

Actually, it looked like Clemens lost his "new" watch in the cavern just before
he jumped to the 24th century where he found the "old" watch on the Enterprise
and then when he went back to the 19th century he saw his "new" watch in th
cavern and left it there.


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: 10702946@eng2.eng.monash.edu.au (PARTH DESAI)
Subject: Q WHO
Keywords: Q WHO ?
Organization: Faculty of Engineering, Monash University 
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 00:55:49 GMT

Q WHO is the episode we are going to watch this thursday down here in 
Australia.
This is the episode where the Enterprise meets the BORG for the first time.

I would like to know exactly how many seasons ahead are the episodes in the 
US compared to this.
BTW last weeks episode was PENPALS.Are the episodes in order at all?
The TV channel was accused of showing episodes out of order. I think they 
are still doing that.

Thanks

PARTH

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: mwalls@nmsu.edu (Commander Keen)
Subject: Re: Possible mistake in Realm of Fear  (maybe some spoilers)
Organization: NMSU Computer Science
Distribution: rec.arts.startrek.current
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 14:05:08 GMT

	




























Me again!

I watched the episode again last night.  I was right!  They showed the
container pieced together on the table, then after Geordi told Barcley
to take some time off, they showed it again, in the background, in
pieces.  

Actually, come to think of it, it wasn't in the background.  The scene
was focusing on Geordi, with the container pieces in the foreground
(slightly out of focus).  

The only way this could not be a production error is if they had to
disassemble the container again for some reason.  But they didn't
explain it.  

The only reason I even mention this error is that when I saw the
container in pieces again, I thought it might have something to do
with the plot.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: lowerjc@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (J. Craig Lowery)
Subject: Re: Glaring Inconsistency (tm) (IMHO) in Time's Arrow Part One
Keywords: Data contraction inconsistency
Organization: Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, Nashville, TN, USA
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 18:08:24 GMT

In article <1a000lINN9ia@agate.berkeley.edu> emarkp@soda.berkeley.edu (E. Mark Ping) writes:

[stuff about Data using "gonna" deleted]

>
>  Ah, but in this instance, it seem that Data made a specific effort to
>*quote* Jack, almost in a condescending [manner?].  
>So he was quoting someone, not
>really speaking in his own words.
>

I inserted [manner] which appears to be a word (or a cousin of a word)
mistakenly left out of the posting.  Anyway, I agree that Data most likely
is imitating Jack, but not to be condescending.  It is not possible for
Data to be condescending (he has no emotions, and condescension would 
require emotions).  He is, I think, trying to "fit in" to the strange
situation in which he finds himself.  Another example is when he adopted
the notion of being from France, based on how others perceived him.

However, the original poster raises a good question.  We have seen Data
mimic things over and over.  He could learn to dance, play violin, etc.,
yet he cannot learn to mimic contractions?

Personally, I think that the writers are having to deal with some problems
previous writers left behind as plot points (distinguishing Data from Lore,
for example).  I think the contraction thing should be dropped and explained
away.  Data has been developing human qualities (e.g., talking to himself
as in _Conspiracy_). However, when you look at all the other inconsistencies
in the Trek Universe, this is insignificant.  I've been asking myself why
they don't just time travel to fix things when they don't go the way they
want them to...but that's another thread which, I think, I've just received
another million postings about...

<Craig>

Craig Lowery
Mississippi College
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.fandom,rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: The Watch and Changing History
Date: 30 Sep 92 19:21:38 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <1992Sep29.013033.26428@cs.wisc.edu> steve@picard.cs.wisc.edu (Steven Glinberg) writes:
>Interestingly, if Twain would have picked up the watch he left in the 
>cave earlier, what would have become of the watch he brought back from
>the enterprise?  And then maybe none of this episode or series would
>happen, or maybe history would have taken a different course!  Ah, a new
>episode idea!

Maybe they did do that.

Maybe when he picked up the wrong watch, or when one of the other characters
made a minor change to their history, they affected the parenthood of the
TNG regulars.  Their upbringing and development, and subsequent moral codes,
were completely different.

Which is why they blew away the cavern without a second thought in the
end.

Subtle, huh?

(BTW, chalk me up as another one who doesn't believe that the ending was
genocide.  To think that an entire alien race would base their entire
food supply on ONE collection route is kind of ludicrous.  And there's
nothing to stop them sucking the souls of people in the present time
anyway.)
From: faurote@crchh484.BNR.CA (Joe Faurote)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: MOTP error?   <* Spoilers *>
Date: 6 Oct 92 17:30:36 GMT
Reply-To: faurote@crchh484.BNR.CA (Joe Faurote)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.

<Spoilers ahead>



























































O.k., Why is it that whenever people age quickly, their hair turns colors as
well?  Wouldn't it take a long time for the hair color to grow in?  By
all rights,
Troi's hair would have had to have been about double in length to turn all to 
grey.  The same thing when she 'morphed' back to young Troi, I would think that
her hair would have stayed grey.  I've seen this phenomenon before (i.e. The
Incredible Hulk :) ) and I've always wondered why the writer's/directors always
opt for the hair to change back with the person?  Any ideas?

************************************************************************
***********
* BNR, my employer, does not share my opinions.  The opposite, it goes
without   *
* saying, is true as well.                                              
*
************************************************************************
***********
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: ras@kepler.unh.edu (Robert A Seace)
Subject: Re: Kling's real name
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 12:39:25 GMT

	Followups to r.a.s.misc...  I don't think they belong in current...

In article <26SEP199221085801@zeus.tamu.edu> pww9211@zeus.tamu.edu (WINFREY, PHILIP WAYNE) writes:
>
>  Okay, for you people that can't seem to catch on, the name of the  
>Klingon planet is KLING.  

	I don't believe that this has ever been stated explicitly.

>Now, in case you didn't see Star Trek VI,
>the name of the original home planet of the Klingons is Kronous I.

	Actually, in ST6, the name mentioned was "Kronos" ("We can't let
them be taken back to Kronos!" - Valeris).  "Kronos I" was the name of the
Klingon battlecruiser which got torpedoed...

>Got It?

	Yeah.  Want it back? ;-) 

||======================================================================||
||  Robert A. Seace  ||  Senior at UNH  ||  E-mail: ras@kepler.unh.edu  ||
||   AKA: Agrajag    ||    CS major     ||                              ||
||======================================================================||
"May I interest you in parts of my body?" - TRATEOTU

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: wmorgan@stsci.edu (Windsor A. Morgan)
Subject: Re: Info please on stations carryind DSN
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 19:24:27 GMT


>>In article <1992Sep30.084810.2376@inland.com> tanski@inland.com writes:
>><A time ago, someone posted which networks would be carring "Deep Space
>><Nine".  If anyone has that information, would you send it, via email, to
>><me?  Thanks in advance.

>In <4202@vidiot.UUCP> brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes:
>>Sorry, but DSN will not be on any network.  It is syndicated.  I had posted
>>a list that I got from an ad in Broadcasting, but now I can't find the file.

In article <j430783@pro-amber.cts.com> rsopicki@pro-amber.cts.com (Randy Sopicki) asks:
>Syndicated, syndicated or do you mean the Fox network?

No, he means "syndicated".  The Fox network is a network.  Deep Space
Nine will be syndicated, just as TNG is syndicated. Here is a copy of
the list the Vidiotposted last summer.


From stsci!noao!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!vidiot!brown Thu Jun 18 07:48:46 EDT 1992
Article: 6195 of rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: ccgwt@trentu.ca (Grant Totten)
Subject: Re: Beta-Zoid Plexing
Reply-To: ccgwt@trentu.ca (Grant Totten)
Organization: Trent University
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 15:40:25 GMT


Ever wonder how many Trekkies in the world were tapping the side of their
neck at 7:35pm on Friday night?  :) :)

There was 3 of us doing it.  Then we looked at ourselves and said, almost
in unison "GET A LIFE!"  :)

Grant/Commander Kablooie!!

Grant Totten, Programmer/Analyst, Trent University, Peterborough Ontario
GTotten@TrentU.CA            Phone: (705) 748-1653   FAX: (705) 748-1246
========================================================================
When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President.  Now
I'm beginning to believe it.
		-- Clarence Darrow
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: linley@netcom.com (Bruce James Robrert Linley)
Subject: Re: Time's Arrow Paradox [spoilers]
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 06:29:53 GMT
Organization: NetCom- Cheaper than Compu$erve (isnt everything, though?)

Spoilers...

>In article <1992Sep27.030335.26463@sol.UVic.CA> jcowling@ophelia.UVic.CA (Scowling Jim Cowling) writes:
>>
>>I just thought of something:  Twain's watch should not exist in the 24th Century
>>as it would be infinitely old.  Think about it.  He picks up his watch in
>>the future, where it is 500 years old, then leaves it in the cave.  Therefore,
>>in the future it must be 1000 years old, then 1500 etc etc.  It's caught in
>>a time loop where it has no existence after the 24th century, but must
>>logically have infinite age at all points in its existence directly after 
>>Clemens' time-travel.
>>
>>In any case, it's a paradox without solution, and they screwed up.  What do
>>y'all think?

There was a similar paradox in STIV:THV, when kirk pawns the Ben Franklin
glasses (a gift from Bones) in 20th century San Francisco. Time travel is
soooooooooooo messy.
-- 
Bruce James Robert Linley | /* You are not expected to understand this */
Comp Sci & Engr, UCLA     | - From the source code for the UNIX v6 Kernel
<linley@netcom.com>       |
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Scotty's return:  What rank?
Date: 26 Sep 92 03:05:33 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout

In article <2z9nzpf.saf@netcom.com> saf@netcom.com (Steve A. Feinstein) writes:
<In article <199smvINN3gj@maico.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@maico.ksu.ksu.edu (Jeffery A Bohning) writes:
<>
<>In article <1992Sep10.141250.22645@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com>, puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com (PuterDude) writes:
<>> rchen@andromeda.rutgers.edu (Ronald K. Chen) acts like a bookie...
<>>
<>>>Anyone taking bets on what rank Mr. Scott will have when he returns
<>>>to TNG?
<>>>
<>Try Admiral.  It worked for McCoy, Why not for Scotty?
<>
<Probably not, as McCoy had the time to achieve Admiral, but Mr. Scott
<has been stuck in some transporter mechanism for 80 some odd years.
<Unle he'd been promoted posthumasly he'll likely not have made it to
<admiral. 

Correct guess, he will be given the rank of Captain.
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
From: CXMP@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA (CXMP)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: My own silly top ten list
Date: 29 Sep 92 22:01:11 GMT
Organization: McGill University

Here's another silly top ten list, this time my own:

The top ten most pointless posts to rec.arts.startrek.current

10. How can Data speak French (R.I.P.) with all those contractions?

9.  This is my personal theory on ...

8.  Worf/Picard/Data/Riker is a wuss/robot/slave/pig!

7.  Troi/Beverly is hot/not-so-hot!

6.  STTNG is not as good as ...

5.  Alexander/Lwaxana must die!

4.  I heard a rumour from my cousin who's the hairdresser of ...

3.  That episode sucked!

2.  I agree.

and *the* most pointless post of all is

1.  Here's another top ten list ...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                ! Address as above or use
Martin Phipps                   ! LOULA@hep.physics.mcgill.ca or simply
                                ! MUHEP::LOULA if you're on a VAX
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terminal freeze, duplicate posts, lost posts and email-come-posts,
these are a few of my least favorite things.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: aberigan@nde.unl.edu (A. Berigan)
Subject: Re: Time's arrow II -- delayed in Portland/Vancouver
Organization: Ord High School, Ord, NE
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:51:57 GMT

rogers@fangorn.wr.tek.com (Roger Southwick) writes:
>petersm@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU (Marguerite Petersen) writes:
>>pip@pro-freedom.cts.com (David Pipgras) writes:

>>>is gonne be
>>>at 9:00 do to some

>>Nice to know I'm not loosing it just yet!

>I thought the add said 9:30PM

Well, it seems people in Portland/Vancouver have something else in common!

"gonna" "due" "losing" "ad"

-- 
aberigan@nde.unl.edu (Greg Berigan)
From: Hofbrau@cup.portal.com (Robert N Brauer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: The Pocket Watch (T.A. Part One)(spoilers)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 22:58:07 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: usa

Possible minor spoilers ahead, bail now.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Enough already.
Clearly, the timeline for the watch is correct if Twain leaves his
new working watch in the cave at the end of TA2 and keeps the 500 
year older one. He picked up the older version before leaving the
younger one in the cave. However, one USUALLY keeps ones watch on
a watch chain in one's vest, as Twain seemed to. The watch he left
in the cave did not seem to be the one on his chain, but the older
possibly non-functional one (He even blew the dust out of it).
This leads to a paradox: the watch in the cave is in a time loop,
having no creation or endpoint. Infinitely old!?! Twain may have  
understood that he was free to make this choice and create an
honest-to-goodness paradox in the "Universal Scheme Of Things".   
Perhaps his smirk at the end was justified. Would you leave a
perfectly good watch to rust in a cave?
Just a thought,
Bob.        Hofbrau - The House of Brauer   hofbrau@cup.portal.com
PS. The bifocals present in TA1 were conspicuously missing in TA2.
From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Three Questions
Date: 29 Sep 1992 21:48:15 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: telecaster.think.com

In article <LX4TRB6w165w@cybernet.cse.fau.edu> sasha@cybernet.cse.fau.edu (David A. Tumarkin) writes:
>> In a previous article, kratnam@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Kapila Ratnam) wrot
>> >1.  Who is Christina Peralta ?
>Actually, if memory serves me, she was the Deltan in ST: The Motion 
>Picture.  Probably wrong though.

I don't think your memory serves you.  Unless there were two, the Deltan in
ST:TMP was played by Persis Khambata.

-- 
Barry Margolin
System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com          {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
From: Peter_A_David@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Reason why TNG is downhilling
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 92 14:48:31 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world
  <16873142E1.YANJUNA@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu>

The length of the episodes is not the problem.  There have been good 
half-hour dramas (jeez, look at "Twilight Zone," for pity's sake).  
The problem is twofold:  First, pacing out the stories to accommodate
those five damned commercial breaks...particularly the last one, because
it interferes with the natural placement of the second act turning point/
climax/resolution story flow.

Second is that too many of the episodes have fallen into a basic formula:
There are two story tracks, one frequently having nothing to do with the
other.  The first track is A Human Drama.  And the second is, all too
often, what I refer to as SETE--Something's Eating The Enterprise.

The sooner they get away from that formula, the better.  Or if they do
have that formula, they at least have to go to greater lengths to tie the
two together.  

PAD
From: bt979@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jeff Preston)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Promos for: RELICS (#230)
Date: 5 Oct 1992 03:50:52 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bt979@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jeff Preston)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, WITHC@CUNYVM.BITNET () says:

>A hmmmmmm.... question.       If Scotty is re-commissioned as Captain of Engin-
>eering.  How would he fit into a TNG Starfleet Uniform?

  Easy... they'd just build one at the Phobos Shipyards for him.  :)


  Jeff

-- 
| Jeff Preston - owner and moderator of | "We don't  get  many requests |
| the  Allan Holdsworth discussion list |  for recent history."  -- Mr. |
| *** To subscribe, send e-mail to: *** |  Atoz, from the '69 Star Trek |
| <atavachron@morekypr.morehead-st.edu> |  episode _All Our Yesterdays_ |