HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: twolf@cs.utah.edu (Tom Wolf)
Subject: Re: Wild cards
Date: 16 Oct 92 14:02:31 MDT
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept
Distribution: na

In article <1992Oct16.124750.26121@cbnewsm.cb.att.com> jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes) writes:
>In article <1bkoleINNhpu@agate.berkeley.edu>, rege@bongo.Berkeley.EDU (Ashutosh G. Rege) writes:
>>  Your counter-whining aside, the argument is not that the Falcons 
>>  didn't deserve to be in the playoffs, it was that the 8-8 Jets and the
>>  9-7 Raiders (or was it the Chiefs ?) didn't. The Eagles and Niners 
>>  should have replaced both these teams, it certainly would have made
>>  for a better caliber of game. Now, as for a better system, it is simple :
>
>Look, I'm the biggest Eagles fan around, but there is no way they, nor
>the 49ers, deserved to make the playoffs last season.  Each conference
>takes the top six teams.  If you can't be one of the top six teams out
>of fourteen then you simply aren't good enough to represent your
>conference.  Both teams knew the rules about how to make the playoffs
>going into the season.  You beat the teams within your division first
>and foremost.  Then make sure you take care of business against teams
>within the conference.  Both teams failed within their division.  Case
>closed.  Better luck next year.
>

I agree. I don't remember too many 49er fans saying the 49ers earned a
playoff spot. There was a lot of wailing about gee, if they had stopped this
pass, or made that field goal. After all, both the Eagles & 49ers were close.
The general feeling of 49er fans was that though they didn't make the playoffs,
if they had they would have gone far. Then again, doesn't every team feel
that way?

I still think something is wrong with the playoff system. I don't like the
conference division setup. It allows teams with poorer records to get into
the playoffs and leads to fans saying my conference is better than yours.
Just take the top 16 teams and have them slug it out.

Tom
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: keithg@boi.hp.com (Keith Glasson)
Subject: Re: Is this the first raiders team to go 0-4?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 08:25:45 GMT
Organization: work
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]



--


((((((((((((((((((((((((keithg@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
             _________________________________________________
            |                                                 |
            |Opinions? These aren't opinions, these are facts!|
            |_________________________________________________|
From: jason@cray.com (Jason Parker)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Need to trade a TE on Fantasy team any suggestions
Date: 7 Oct 92 15:53:47 GMT
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.


I suggest picking up TE Ron Hall from Tampa Bay.  Tampa is hot
and Vinny likes Hall alot.  He has 15 receptions on the year!
And 2 TDs.  Pick him and stick with him.

Jason Parker
jason@cray.com


In article <Bvpu0L.AAy@encore.com>, jsosa@encore.com (Joe Sosa) writes:
> 
> In <BvpKrz.G5p@acsu.buffalo.edu> v070q285@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Jacob L Goldman) writes:
> 
> | 
> | My fantasy team has Ed West as its tight end.  He isn't doing anything this
> | year.  I want to get someone new.  Does anyone have any suggestions?
> | The following players are already taken:
> | Pete Metzelaars(BUF)
> | Butch Rolle(PHO)
> | Keith McKeller(BUF)
> | Keith Jackson(MIA)
> | Ferall Edmunds(MIA)
> | Ethan Horton(RAI)
> | Brent Jones(S.F.)
> | Marv Cook(N.E.)
> | Eric Green(PIT)
> | Steve Jordan(MINN)
> | Jay Novacek(DAL)
> | Your help in this matter will be greatly appreciated.  Please reply by E-mail.
> | 
> | Thank you,
> | 
> | Jacob
> 
> 
> Here is a question??? Is Shannon Sharpe from Denver a TE?  He's listed as
> a TE on one preseason publication and is listed as WR on another.  He has
> been having great games lately?  If he is a TE, grab him!
> 
> Joe Sosa
> 
> 
>
From: 343VTQ2@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (William Grant)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: EAGLES WILL GO 15-1 AND WIN THE SUPERBOWL AND KILL THE REDGIRLS
Date: 16 Oct 92 06:26:34 GMT
 <1bk9vqINN6ta@rodan.UU.NET> <1bkakrINN7k5@rodan.UU.NET>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Central Michigan University

How about the (not so) mighty eagles will go 13-3,  choke in the playoffs,
and watch the Super Bowl from home on their TV sets!!!  How about tuning
down the violence a notch or two as well.  All this killing and destroying
and cussing is making me feel like I'm watching a bad remake of Friday
13th part 752,  Jason moves to Philadelphia!  SHEESH!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: smorris@venus.lerc.nasa.gov (Ron Morris )
Subject: Lions News
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 13 Oct 1992 12:26 EDT  

WR Herman Moore and TE Thomas McLemore are coming off IR and will
be ready for Minnesota.  TE Mike Hinnant was cut.  Moore coming
back will help.  He had become Peete's favorite receiver and was
looking real good.  His replacement (Barrett) was benched in most
of the games he played.  McLemore gives them much more of a pass
catching threat at TE.

Still no trades for an OL and, with the trading deadline coming up
(I think tommorrow), it looks like the Lions are going with what
they have.  At his point, I'd rather not have a trade.  Other teams
know the Lions are desparate and are asking way too much.  Also: 
it looks like the Lions need two guards instead of one;  they are
already in a big hole at 1-4;  and consider that it takes a while
for new offensive lineman to be worked in.  All this adds up to the
conclusion that things don't look too good for this year even if
they could make a deal or two, so why make a bad deal at this point.
As for the Minnesota game, I think the Lions will play well.  There
have been other problems outside the OL, mainly due to poor concentration
and lack of intensity.  The players definately view this as a do or
die game, so the feeling is these problems will go away.  If they
are ever going to get fired up this year, now's the time.  They have
three straight division games coming up.  They really need to win
all three to realistically think about the playoffs.  We'll see
starting Thursday.

Ron
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: JGH computer rankings - week 7
Date: 15 Oct 92 01:14:43 GMT
Article-I.D.: macc.1992Oct15.021624.11341
Organization: University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center

In article <1992Oct13.213001.14113@hou.amoco.com>, zjsg12@hou.amoco.com (Jeffry S. Gracey) writes...

>I'd have to disagree with rating the Chiefs over the Oilers, even after the victory over the Eagles. I was at the Oilers/Chiefs game and the Oilers looked like a much better team. They should have won a lot easier.
>	
>As far the Redskins - as usual , they look good in 1 MNF game and everybody thinks they are back. Settle down folks - they're weak.

I don't think you can use the results of any single game in making 
your ratings.  Should the Steelers be rated better than the Oilers?  
They beat them in week one.

JGH
From: Mark.Perew@p201.f208.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: NINERS WIN!!! YESSS!
X-Sender: newtout 0.02 Oct  1 1992
Date: 06 Oct 92  23:00:27

In a message of <Oct 02 10:44>, Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Go
GIANTS!)
writes:

 >It scares me that people like you work at lockheed....

It scares you that people like Bob can recognize bovine excrement when they
see it?

ObFootball:  What happened to the big D when SF played the Lambs?

--- Mark Perew  Mark.Perew@ofa123.fidonet.org
--- Mark's Information Repository and Funtime Emporium (1:103/208.201)

 

--- Squish v1.00
From: smm@rodan.UU.NET (Steve Mansfield)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Washington Redskins News - Oct. 14, 1992
Date: 15 Oct 1992 11:23:52 -0400
Organization: UUNET Technologies Inc, Falls Church, VA

In article <1992Oct15.030624.14761@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> metz@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Daniel M Metz) writes:
>
>Also, what exactly is a "compound dislocation"?  A compound fracture is when
>the bone breaks and then also breaks through the skin, but I don't see how
>anything similar could happen with a dislocation...Any orthopedists out
>there?

Similar thing.  He dislocated the finger, which caused the sking at the
knuckle to tear open.  Finger dislocations in football are fairly common.
The only reason they were concerned about him is that they wanted the
skin to heal.

Steve Mansfield                   Junior AlterNet Engineer 
smm@uunet.uu.net                  uunet!smm
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske)
Subject: Re: Vikings 31 Lions 14
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 16:31:27 GMT

delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE) writes:

>  I hereby apologize to all Vikings fans for underestimating their chances
>  in my NFC prediction. Lokks like the Vikes have some life!

Sheesh, no need to apologize.  The expectations of Vikes fans (here in 
Minnesota at least) were so low at the beginning of this season, that I
think a sweep of Green Bay would have marked a succesful season for many.
I guess the more we saw of Dennis Green and his staff in training camp and
the preseason, the more we kinda thought maybe the team wouldn't be so bad,
but there was no way most of use oft-burned fans were going to admit it.
There's still a lot of season left, but it feels good to have the Vikes in
the position that they are right now in the division.

John Ganske

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rja@redwood.cray.com (Russ Anderson)
Subject: Re: Vikes for real
Originator: rja@redwood
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 8 Oct 92 09:28:45 CDT


In article <seoEMWG00iV0Q9MZAm@andrew.cmu.edu>, ka0k+@andrew.cmu.edu (Karim Edvard Ahmed) writes:
> I feel that the Minnesota Vikings have found the one element that hes
> been missing from their game plans over the last five years: desire. 
> While this years team may not be as talented as it was three years ago,
> it still posesses some enormous potential, as has been seen the last
> three weeks.  In a division as weak as the NFC Central, the Vikings
> appear to be the one team with the ability to run away with the title,
> and advance beyond the first round of the playoffs.  Of course, it is
> still very early in the season, and greater challenges lie ahead. 
> Perhaps the Vikes will turn out to be this year's surprise team, as the
> Minnesota Twins were one year ago.
> -KEA

Amazing stat:

Before the Chicago game, the Vikes had trailed going in to the 4th Q
31 times since 1986.  They came back to win just one of those games.
1-30 when trailing going into the 4th Q is not the sign of a team
with desire.

-- 
Russ Anderson    |  Disclaimer: Any statements are my own and do not reflect
------------------              upon my employer or anyone else.  (c) 1992
EX-Twins' Jack Morris, 10 innings pitched, 0 runs (World Series MVP!)
From: cpm@clyde.clearpoint.com (Chris Martel)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Patriots News 10/16
Date: 16 Oct 92 20:16:59 GMT
Reply-To: cpm@clyde.clearpoint.com
Organization: Clearpoint Research Corp, Hopkinton MA 01748

In article <a750288.33@pan.mc.ti.com> a750288@pan.mc.ti.com (John E. Brennan) writes:


>There's also been rumors for a while now that the Patriots will be going
>sometime in the future, probably to St. Louis.  I've got some questions
>on that:

>1.  To Patriots fans in NE: how much stock do you put in these rumors, and
>what are your feelings about NE losing the Pats?

These rumors have been going around for awhile, even back when the Sullivans
were in charge. It's possible they will move, but I do not think it will
happen for 3 reasons:

1) The NFL will not want the move to happen because the loss of the media
market. The Boston area is about the 5th largest media market in the country.
I doubt St. Louis is even close. If you look at the last 3 moves(raiders,
Cardinals, and Colts) each team moved to about an equivalent or larger media
market.

2) Even though the Pats are a poor football team they are entrenched in the
community. I would not think the Pats would move without a big fight from
the Mass. government and the fans(at least from me :-) 

3) The St. Louis Patriots just doesn't sound right :-)

The rumors really started getting more serious when Orthwein(sp?) bought
the Pats from Victor Kiam. Orthwein publicly stated he wanted to move
them to St Louis or get an NFL expansion team in St louis.

As far as my personal feelings, I would be very bummed if they moved.
They are one of the original NFL franchises. There recent history has
been a fiasco, but just 7 years ago they were in the superbowl!

Also, thanks for the Patriots updates! Maybe they will beat the 15.5 pt
spread this week.

>John 

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------

>John Brennan 

>a750288@pan.mc.ti.com 


Chris Martel			cpm@clyde.clearpoint.com
Clearpoint Research		cpm@cpoint.UUCP
From: riff@coos.dartmouth.edu (Christopher P. Riff)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Chicago Bears STATS. Week #5
Date: 9 Oct 92 13:35:38 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

U58582@uicvm.uic.edu writes:

>GAME SUMMARY
>Bears think football game lasts only 30 mins.  Vikings cameback
>from 0-20 in the 4th when the Bears showed why they are ranked 26th
>in the D.

Actually, the Bears played for 46 minutes this week. Things are 
improving...
From: rscott@ra.csc.ti.com (Roderick Scott)
Subject: Re: NFL_1992 Scoreboard: Playoff Forecasts
Organization: Texas Instruments
Distribution: world,local
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 13:56:43 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.231853.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu> f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin) writes:
>The computer program's predictions for the 1992 NFL playoffs have changed
>again from last week.  Will there be a Super Bowl rematch?
>
>As of today, the computer program predicts:
>
>AFC Championship: Houston vs. Buffalo
>NFC Championship: Washington vs. San Francisco
>
>Super Bowl: Washington vs. Buffalo
>
>Super Bowl Champion: WASHINGTON REDSKINS
>-- 
>Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
>f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."
>
>"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
>	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
>"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
>	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's


>As of today, the computer program predicts:

What Is Your Bases (DATA) For This Forecast.?? Not A Cowboy Fan, But You Got To
Count Them In The BIG DANCE..

-- 
Roderick Scott|This Line Intentionally Left Blank|Texas Instruments
rscott@ti.com |				         |Fax (214) 995-0403

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Go GIANTS!)
Subject: Re: Best Performance
Organization: Yale University Computing & Information Systems
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 13:53:31 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.215427.596@seq.uncwil.edu> rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith) writes:
>From: rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith)
>Subject: Re: Best Performance
>Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 21:54:27 GMT

>Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (Go GIANTS!) writes:

>> John, can you post Joe "Party Animal" Montana's stats for his 
>>superbowl performances. 
>>Yeah, he played in more SB's, overall giving him more yards, but were his 
>>completion percentages better?
>>I dont have the stats, but my bet is NOT!
>>Adriene L. Nazaretian        

>   Here is food for thought (ie the stats you want)...
>Joe Montana:
>SB      Opponent          Att  Comp Pct. Yards  Avg.  TD   INT Rating
>-----   ----------------  ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ------
>XVI     Cincinnati          22   14 63.6   157  7.14    1    0  100.0
>XIX     Miami               35   24 68.6   331  9.46    3    0  127.2
>XXIII   Cincinnati          36   23 63.9   357  9.92    2    0  115.2
>XXIV    Denver              29   22 75.9   297 10.24    5    0  147.6

>Phil Simms:
>SB      Opponent          Att  Comp Pct. Yards  Avg.  TD   INT Rating
>-----   ----------------  ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ------
>XXI     Denver              25   22 88.0   268 10.72    3    0  150.9 


Ok this is what I was talking about, now before the flames start, there is 
no doubt in my mind (however sick and polluted it is) that Joe is one of 
the worlds best quarterbacks.

What I was getting at is that Simms DOES have the best single superbowl 
performance record.


So John, your othodontist or mine?  
This is before    :-o      
This is after     :-O

Thanks to whoever posted the stats.

>Highest Completion Pct (Lifetime - min 40 
atts)
>-----------------------------------------------
>68.0 Joe Montana, San Francisco 4 games
>63.6 Len Dawson, Kansas City 2 games
>63.4 Bob Greise, Miami 3 games

>Highest Completion Pct (Game - min 20 atts)
>-------------------------------------------
>88.0 Phil Simms (25-22)

YES!
 
>75.9 Joe Montana (29-22)
>73.5 Ken Anderson (34-25)

>Draw whatever conclusions you will...

Mine are drawn!  
Adriene L. Nazaretian        
Yale University              
ADRIENE@YALEADS.BITNET        
ADRIENE@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU
From: smm@rodan.UU.NET (Steve Mansfield)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: EAGLES WILL GO 15-1 AND WIN THE SUPERBOWL AND KILL THE REDGIRLS
Date: 15 Oct 1992 13:43:55 -0400
Organization: UUNET Technologies Inc, Falls Church, VA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: rodan.uu.net

In article <1bk9vqINN6ta@rodan.UU.NET> smm@rodan.UU.NET (Steve Mansfield) writes:
>These redfaces must have a *really* bad offensive line.  And I thought
>the Redskin's line was bad....

I'm sorry, I meant *defensive* line here.  Silly me....

Steve Mansfield                   Junior AlterNet Engineer 
smm@uunet.uu.net                  uunet!smm
From: kayuucee@cvl.umd.edu (Kenneth W. Crist Jr.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Request: Highest Score in NFL history
Date: 15 Oct 92 14:28:41 GMT
Organization: Center for Automation Research, Univ. of Md.

In article <1992Oct15.140324.8731@seq.uncwil.edu>, rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith) writes:
> >Looking for the team with the highest scoring game in NFL history, date, 
> >place, etc...
> 
> >Thanks in Advance
> 
> >Adriene L. Nazaretian
> 
> Your Giants got beat in the highest scoring NFL game of all time 72-41
> in NY by the 'Skins on Nov 27 1966.

	Correct.

> The 72 points by Washington is also the highest number of points scored
> in a single game by any team in NFL history.

	This is a mistake. The Chicago Bears beat the Washington Redskins 73-0
in the 1940 NFL Championship game. (I think it was '40.) Some points of
interest. 1) Two weeks earlier the Redskins beat the Bears 14-7, so the
Redskins couldn't have been too outmatched. 2) Early in the game Sammy Baugh
hit an open receiver in the endzone and he dropped the ball. After game Baugh
was asked if that would have made a difference. Baugh said, "Sure, it would
have been 73-6."

						Ken Crist
						kayuucee@cvl.umd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: CHIEFS SHALL MANHANDLE THE "hardly-the-Eagles COWboys"
Originator: delarocq@c00080-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Keywords: victory, celebration, chops, high-5's.....
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 04:18:22 GMT




 I predict a close game, where awkward defensive plays will make the difference.

 Kansas City will beat the Cowboys 16-14 at Texas Stadium.

 K.C. will score one touchdown, and Lowery will kick 3 field goals to win.

 The Cowboys will score 2 TD's, one for Irvin, and one for Harper.

 
 I CAN'T WAIT!!!!!

 :)
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
   BBB   U  U  FFFF  FFFF  AAA   L   OOO     BBB    I  L     L   SSS     !
  B   B U  U  F     F     A  A  L   O   O   B   B  I  L     L   S   S   !
 BBBBB U  U  FFFF  FFFF  AAAA  L   O   O   BBBBB  I  L     L     SS    !
B   B U  U  F     F     A  A  L   O   O   B   B  I  L     L    S   S  
 BBB   UU  F     F     A  A  LLLL  OOO     BBB  I  LLLL  LLLL   SSS  !

Raiders Fans: Prepare to Lose!

Reporter: "Who do you think is the best running back in the NFL?"
Thurman Thomas: "The running back that went to Oklahoma State".
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Foolish Fish !!!
Date: 16 Oct 92 15:54:20 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <152680008@hpuerca.atl.hp.com>, krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes) writes:
> I can't believe all the Dolphin hype, they won one big game in a row. Last
> week was the first really good showing for their defense this season. It was
> also Marino's first good ( by the standard He set)game. To see all the
> talk of an undefeared season I think is really foolish.
> This week they Play The Falcons and the game may be a cakewalk for the fish
> but if the real Marino and the real Miami defense show, We got the game in the
> bag.       ^^^^^^^^^^^
> 

            I guess the "real Marino" by your implication, is not good
enough to help the fins win against the Falcons. I am stunned by your
football knowledge.

                         -doug THE dolfan-
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The EAGLES have landed OR Cowboys caught with pants down!
Date: 9 Oct 1992 13:46:13 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <1992Oct7.152819.4479@cbnewsm.cb.att.com> jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes) writes:
>
>Ask Jimmy Johnson if he wanted Aikman throwing the ball 38-times.  His
>answer will be no because the more you have to throw against the GANG
>GREEN the better chance of them making BIG plays.  And that, old chap,
>is, was, and always will be the Eagles defensive game plan.

Sure, JJ would have liked to let Emmitt Smith carry the ball 30 times,
roll up 130 yards and win 42-0, but I kinda think he knew things wouldn't
go that way.  Even Norv Turner, during an interview with ESPN's Andrea
Kraemer on SportsCenter before the game, said that it wasn't a question
of Emmitt running effectively against the Birds, but just Emmitt running.
Just by the Eagles knowing that the Cowboys would keep going to Emmitt,
even if his yards-per-carry to that point was not impressive, made them
play a more honest defense.  Aikman was able to use that to his advantage
by moving the Cowboys with the pass in the first half.  It wasn't until
the 4th quarter when the Cowboys were down by more than 2 TD's that it
became evident that Dallas couldn't keep giving the ball to Smith.  The
Birds were able to totally commit to pass defense.



Ray    GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gary@colossus.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand)
Subject: Re: Redskins-Broncos Game Summary
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 18:56:28 GMT

sw> Steve Williams

sw> PASSING:
    Broncos:    At  Cp  Yd  TD  Int   Redskins:   At  Cp  Yd  TD  Int
    Elway       32  11 128   0    1   Rypien      26  16 245   1    0
    Maddox       8   2  10   0    1

--
Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF