HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: MSU vs. Alabama prediction (was Re: Gators are DONE!!!)
Date: 5 Oct 92 15:17:43 GMT
Article-I.D.: psuvm.92279.111744JCT3
 <BvIGzu.597@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <dkm2.718075441@Isis.MsState.Edu>
 <1992Oct3.021346.11706@chpc.utexas.edu> <dkm2.718222844@Isis.MsState.Edu>
Organization: Penn State University

In article <dkm2.718222844@Isis.MsState.Edu>, dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K.
Magee) says:
>
>boisseau@chpc.utexas.edu (John R. Boisseau (Jay)) writes:
>
>>In article <dkm2.718075441@Isis.MsState.Edu> dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K.
>Magee) writes:
>>>Early prediction: MSU & Bama  the game will be all defense & special teams
>>>with little or no offense.
>>>
>>>David
>
>>Well, lets see how rational this is. Alabama NEVER has an offense, MSU
>>has lost it's star QB who triggered their entire offense, and also
>>lost their 2nd string QB... gee, David, you really went out on a limb
>>with that prediction, eh? ;-)
>
>>Jay
>
>Well, Jay, I don't want to just outright say we will beat Bama, but if
>our backup QB can get into the groove, we should be able to.
>
And it will be the Bama D's sacred task to insure not only that the backup
QB doesn't get into the groove, but also to make said QB rue the day he
with Miss. State, to curse his parents for having brought him into the
world, to make MSU wives weep and MSU babies cry,  to--

So sorry; I must have been trance channeling for a Houston fan.  We
now return to our regularly scheduled woof.                                    +

Bama's offense may be getting on track (I freely admit that this is a          |
highly qualified observation; scoring on South Carolina isn't like scoring     |
against the Citadel, after all (oohh, did I write that?)); this could          |
bode ill for MSU.

Right now, though, I'm working on the necessary hexes to bring Heath Shuler
& Co. crashing down to reality on the [echo effect] THIRD SATURDAY IN
OCTOBERRRrrrrrrr . . .


Jim Thomas
"He who scores the most, wins."
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: chee1jz@Rosie.UH.EDU
Subject: Re: Danny Ford Back
Reply-To: chee1jz@Rosie.UH.EDU
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 19:55:11 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.150745.26734@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM>, ldr@lightnin.Columbia.NCR.COM (Dale Robbins) writes:
>I just heard ex-Clemson coach Danny Ford was hired as an Assistant Offensive
>Coach, Consultant, by Arkansas.  What is THAT???  If your going to hire me 
>give me a big title!
>
Probably a transitional position, before he is named head coach at season's end.


>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dale Robbins                               
> Surface Mount Operations Center                 NCR MCPD -- Columbia
> phone: (803) 739-6155                           Operations & Distribution
>                                                 3325 Platt Springs Road
> email: dale.robbins@ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM          West Columbia, SC 29170
>
>Thoughts expressed here are my own and not representative of NCR
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
	Larry Fore			COMMS:
					chee1jz@jetson.uh.edu
					lbfore@uh.edu
					(713) 743-4338
From: lbaum@atc.boeing.com (Larry Baum)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami, Florida
Date: 30 Sep 92 16:36:41 GMT
Organization: Boeing Computer Services

rjones@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Randolph M. Jones) writes:
>In article <5653@news.duke.edu> ds4@soc5.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS
SIDIROPOULOS) writes:
>>Well I guess we will never know about Washington since they do not play
anyone of
>>note.
>>
That's funny; when MIami played Nebraska in the Orange Bowl last Jan., Miami
fans were hardly claiming that the Cornhuskers were not "of note".  Anyway, as
has been pointed out before college schedules are made so far in advance that
it is hard to predict whether one is scheduling a tough opponent or not. 
Certainly at the time the schedule was made, Nebraska had to be considered a
likely 1st class opponent.  The absence of UCLA from the schedule is
predetermined by Pac 10 rules; UW has no choice in that.  That leaves the 2
other games: Wisconsin and Pacific.  Wisconsin was clearly a soft spot all
along, but every major team arranges soft spots.  I believe that Pacific was a
last minute (in the college scheduling time frame) replacement for another
tougher school that bagged out of the game.

I agree that UW does not have any opponent the quality of FSU (not sure about
Miami's quality :-) ) or Texas A&M.  But the Rose Bowl opponent is likely to be
of high caliber.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: crs@milton.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Subject: Re: Huskies and parties
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 04:20:36 GMT

bkowal@aludra.usc.edu (Brian A. Kowal) writes:
>
>I saw on the news the mention of some UW Huskie players that partied a
>bit too much this last weekend.  Did they get in trouble with the law?
>Or was is just general no-info news that I heard.
>
There was an extremely unfortunate incident on frat row over the weekend.
The owner of a private apartment was having a party which four 
unidentified football players allegedly were attending.  There was
some sort of altercation out in the street between members of the party
and members of a frat house across the street.  One thing led to another
and some of the frat boys stared throwing bottles.  One of the bottles
hit a young lady in the eye and put it out.  There hasn't been any info
beyond the initial report about the football players other than coach
Don James saying that he was looking into the incident.  As of now,
no players have been suspended to my knowledge.  The local press has
put a considerable amount of heat on the fraternity system here.  Frat
row is widely considered to be one of the more hazardous places to be
if you are a police officer in Seattle, since the frat boys don't 
accept authority from the police, but taunt them, etc.  Last year,
one officer was hit by a BB gun fired from one frat.  In addition,
there have been several widely publicized hazing incidents which
involved the use of animals (sheep and chickens if you want to get
specific...).  The incident has certainly not been ignored by the
Seattle media, but other than the initial reports, there has been nothing
at all said about football players.  Of course, this could change by
gametime :-(

>BTW Someone posted that UW, by going to the Rose Bowl three times in a
>row would break know records needs to go over thier facts again, USC
>has done it a couple times.
>
U$C has gone to the Rose Bowl something like five times in a row.  They
have not, however, won it three times in a row.  Nobody has.  Yet.

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
University of Washington      *   water again!
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
From: lbaum@bcsaic.boeing.com (Larry Baum)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Who is number 1?
Date: 6 Oct 92 05:39:33 GMT
Organization: Boeing Computer Services AI Center, Seattle

In article <ASH.92Oct5090713@ulysses.mr.ams.com> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:
: 
: Washington - played poorly against USC
They didn't play great, but "poorly" is a little strong.
Their defense played extremely well.

: Miami - exciting but sloppy game.  Good defense.  Offense shaky all year.
OK
: FSU - Nope.  Lost a game.
: Michigan - Perhaps the best team in the country right now, but has a tie.

Yeah, yeah.  Just like last year.  I rember all sorts of talk
in Nov. & Dec. about how Mich. was playing the best football
in the country.  Then came the Rose Bowl...

: Texas A&M - barely beat texas Tech.
: 
: 
: Only Michigan had a good game this week in the top five.  Hopefully,
: several more weeks of football will clear things up a bit.  But I
: doubt it.

One of the Fla. schools was bound to lose. Both Tennessee and
Alabama can make claims about playing the best right now, too.

And Penn St. has a legitimate shot.

UW has the scheduling advantage though.  And with USC, Cal,
Stanford and Nebraska on the schedule it is strong enough,
along with a Rose Bowl vicotory, that going undefeated will
likely be enough to repeat as national champs.


-- 
Larry Baum
Computer Science Organization
Boeing Computer Services     uucp:       uw-beaver!bcsaic!lbaum
(206) 865-3365               internet:   lbaum@atc.boeing.com       
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re:      Gupta Power Ratings 9-28-92
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 21:37:37 GMT

In article <92272.141909C31801AG@wuvmd.wustl.edu> Bapi Gupta <C31801AG@WUVMD> writes:
>
>By the way, how come no one ever flames my ratings (except Njan, who is
>getting boring to counterflame)?

Actually, I am yet to flame your rankings because I don't think they are
worth it..

>Bapi

Besides, why argue with a fool? I can do better than that.

Njan
From: mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: This Week in the SEC (Sept. 26)
Summary: Dawgs rout Rebels, LSU upset by Colorado State
Date: 27 Sep 92 18:44:11 GMT
Organization: Ramblin' Wrecks from Georgia Tech

Games this weekend:

ALABAMA (4-0) shutout Louisiana Tech (2-2), 13-0

The Tide received a spark from David Palmer's 63 yard punt return
for a TD and once again played superb defense.  The visiting
Bulldogs netted -8 yards rushing for the game.

ARKANSAS (1-3) fell to Memphis State (1-3), 22-6

The Tigers regrouped from their internal strife this week to easily
beat the Hapless Hogs.  Memphis State tied the record for blocked
punts in a game with 3.

AUBURN (3-1) beat Southern Miss (2-2), 16-8

The Tigers snapped a 2-game losing streak to the Golden Eagles in
a somewhat lackluster performance.  Tiger FB Reid McMilion scored
the home team's lone TD on a 28 yard jaunt.

FLORIDA (1-1) was idle.

GEORGIA (3-1) slammed OLE MISS (2-2), 37-11

This one was never really close, as Eric Zeier threw for a bundle and
Garrison Hearst turned in his requisite big play of the week, this
time a 64 yard TD on a simple flare pass.

KENTUCKY (3-1) edged SOUTH CAROLINA (0-4), 13-9

It was not at all pretty for the Wildcats, but they equalled last
season's victory total and won their first conference game in
nearly 2 years.  TB Terry Samuels scored the game's only TD on
a 2 yard dive to cap a 63 yard drive.

Colorado State (1-3) stunned LSU (1-3), 17-14

Credit the crafty Earl Bruce or figure that LSU was looking ahead to 
Tennessee next weekend, but either way the Rams pulled a major
upset Saturday night in Baton Rouge.  CSU scored on 4th-and-goal
with just 50 seconds remaining to take the win.

MISSISSIPPI STATE (2-1) was idle.

TENNESSEE (4-0) blasted Cincinnati (0-3), 40-0

The Bearcats made Johnny Majors' return an easy one.  Freshman
Shawn Summers returned a punt 77 yards for a TD and the Vols 
rolled up 356 yards of offense and grabbed 3 Cincy turnovers.

VANDERBILT (2-1) was idle.

S E C   S t a n d i n g s
=================================================================
E a s t          Conf   Overall  | W e s t         Conf   Overall
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tennessee        2-0    4-0      | Alabama         2-0    4-0
Georgia          2-1    3-1      | Auburn          1-1    3-1
Kentucky         1-1    3-1      | Arkansas        1-1    1-3
Vanderbilt       1-1    2-1      | LSU             1-1    1-3
Florida          1-1    1-1      | Ole Miss        1-2    2-2
South Carolina   0-3    0-4      | Mississippi St. 0-1    2-1

-- 
Mark Mitchell           Georgia Tech            mm42@prism.gatech.edu
 "What's that he's tearing apart with his claws and his teeth?"        
                           "That's his faithful teenage sidekick Buddy!"                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: milius@proton.med.umn.edu (Bob Milius (BMEC))
Subject: computer power ratings
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 22:18:37 GMT

I have a question regarding the computer ratings/rankings that are posted
here (ie. schmidt, gupta, etc). I know you folks use some initial rankings
at the beginning of the season, presumably based on last years results
and taking into account for returning starters and such. Have you ever
tried to randomize the preseason rankings before you run your algorithms, say
10 times? I'd be interested in seeing how dependent the rankings are
with the initial conditions. Do you always end up with the same result?
How much deviation is there?

just curious,
bob
a Michigan fan
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Milius                                        milius@lenti.med.umn.edu
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 21:53:04 EDT
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: TROJAN NEWS VOL.9 (USC/UW NOTES)

>(USC stuff)

So, how's that great band of yours this year?

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Eric West)
Subject: Re: ND-Purdue (saw the game at ND)
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.college
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 04:24:04 GMT


Hmmmm...

Sept. 5  Notre Dame 42, Northwestern 7
Sept. 26 Notre Dame 48, Purdue 0

Does this mean that Northwestern is 13 points better than Purdue? :) :) :)

We'll find out Saturday...

ecw
fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
"Victory is never sweeter than when it occurs at Northwestern."
GO CATS!!!
From: tshannon@ccad.uiowa.edu (Timothy J Shannon)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: NAIA Divsion I & II Polls
Summary: Division I & II top 20/5
Date: 30 Sep 92 21:07:37 GMT
Followup-To: NCAA Div. II Top 25
Organization: CAD-Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City
   	Here is the top 20 and 25 for NAIA.

-----------------------------------------------------
NAIA Division I Top 20		Record  Points	PRV
-----------------------------------------------------
1. Crsn-Nwmn (10)       	3-0-0	199	 2
2. SW Oklahoma			3-0-0	183	 3
3. Northeastern St.		3-0-1	176	 4
4. Central State (1)		3-1-0	171	 1
5. Central Arkansas   		2-1-1	168	 6
6. Concord W. Virginia		2-1-0	138	 8
7. Elcon, NC.			2-1-0	132	 9
8. Southwest State		2-1-0	124	10
9. Harding, Ark.		2-1-0	121	11
10. W. Virginia St.		3-1-0	105	 5
11. Gardner-Webb		3-1-0	103	13
12. Arkansas Tech.		2-1-1	92	16
13. Lenoir-Rhyne		2-1-0	 90	16
14. Glenville State		2-1-0	 85	17
15. SE Oklahoma			2-2-0	 57	12
16. Shepard West Virginia	2-2-0	 42	19
17. NW Oklahoma			1-2-1	 34	14
18. St. Francis, Ill.		1-2-0	 29	20
19. Catawba, NC.		1-2-0	 23	15
20. Henderson St.		1-3-0	 8	18
------------------------------------------------------

_____________________________________________________
NAIA Division II Top 25		Record  Points	PRV
------------------------------------------------------
1. Georgetown (17)		3-0-0	425	 1
2. C. Washington		2-0-0	400	 2
3. Linfield Ore.		2-0-0	385	 3
4. Westimar, Pa.		3-0-0	374	 4
5. Findlay, Ohio		2-0-0	362	 5
6. Baker, Kan.			3-0-0	322	 7
7. NORTHWESTERN, Ia.		4-0-0	293	13
8. Pacific Lutheran		2-1-0   292	 8
9t. Benadictine, Kan		3-0-0	287	10
9t. Rocky Mountain 		4-0-0	287	11
11. Cmpbllsville.		3-0-0	259	12
12. Tarleton St.		4-0-0	219	18
13. Dickison St.	 	2-1-0	203	15
14. Austin College		3-1-0	154	20
15. Dakota Wesleyn		4-0-0   152	21
16. Midwestern State		2-2-0	146	 9
17. Nebraska Wesleyn		2-1-0	145      6
18. Dakota State, SD		4-0-0	130	19
19. W. Washington		2-0-0   129	23
20. Peru State			3-1-0	126	22
21. Minot State 		3-1-0	 91	25
22. Howard-Payne		3-2-0	 78     14
24. Willaim Jewell		2-1-0	 41	 -
25. Monatana Tech		3-1-0	 37	17
----------------------------------------------------

Source:
The Cedar Rapids Gazette
Tuesday September 29,1992 

-- 
___ ___ _   _    _       _             _
 |   |  | \/ |  (_  |_| |_| |\ | |\ | | | |\ | timothy-shannon@uiowa.edu 
 |  _|_ |    |   _) | | | | | \| | \| |_| | \| tshannon@CCAD.UIOWA.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: alspach@cs.sfu.ca (Brian Alspach)
Subject: Re: FSU v. Miami
Organization: CSS, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 00:59:51 GMT

Kevin Delgado includes the following in his message.

>WASHINGTON #1 OUCH!
>   With Washington moving into first place many wonder what that leaves for 
>the winner of the FSU Miami game. Washington, after all, has an easy slate 
>the rest of the way.
>   There are three things to keep in mind. First, whoever wins the upcoming
>game between #2 and #3 will gain first place votes. Second, this past week's
>poll proved Washington could fall even without losing, or playing for that 
>matter. Third, Washington does not play UCLA this year in PAC 10 competition,
>and if UCLA went undefeated in the PAC 10 they would earn the Rose Bowl.
>Washington would then go to the Fiesta, setting up an unlikely but intriguing
>matchup with perhaps the winner of the FSU-Miami game should the victor 
>continue to win.
>   For FSU and Miami fans who have suddenly become UCLA fans, here's the 
>Bruin's remaining schedule: at Arizona Oct. 3, Stanford Oct. 10, at 
>Washington St. Oct. 17, ASU Oct. 24, at Cal Oct. 31, Oregon St. Nov. 7, at 
>Oregon Nov.14, and USC Nov. 21.
>   Washington faces USC Oct. 3 at home, Cal on Oct. 10, at Oregon Oct. 17, 
>Pacific Oct. 24, Stanford Oct. 31, at Arizona Nov. 7, Oregon St. Nov. 14, and
>at Washington St. Nov. 21.
>   Interesting, isn't it, how Arizona has, and could continue to, play into
>the outcome of FSU's season if the Seminoles continue to win? College 
>football at this level truly takes on a national perspective.
>
>It most certainly does...think about it. UCLA doesnt seem to be in any real
>danger of losing the rest of the way. Who knows, maybe we will get a real NC
>this year after all!
>
>Kevin.

It seems as if no one learns from past experience. People are talking
after only four weeks as if there are going to be an unprecedented number
of undefeated teams at the end of the regular season. It has never
happened before and I see no reason for it to happen now. The above
article makes it sound as if both U-Dub and UCLA have a cakewalk through
the rest of the season. Others are touting at least one undefeated team
from Florida, still others Texas A&M, Alabama, Tennessee, etc. Stanford,
USC, and Cal all can knock off either U-Dub or UCLA with only a few breaks.
Let's save the fantasies until the end of October as the list of undefeated
teams dwindles.





Article 21273 of rec.sport.football.college:
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rick@seminole.b30.ingr.com (Rick Hopkins)
Subject: Re: FSU v. MIAMI
Reply-To: b11!seminole!rick@ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 13:57:47 GMT

In article <7z_pn=q@lynx.unm.edu>, jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep28.165819.28850@cs.ucf.edu> tech@maitland.cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini) writes:
|> >In article <1p_pt+r@lynx.unm.edu> jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund) writes:
|> >>In article <BvAMrM.BC9@news.larc.nasa.gov> ohmann@sabaad.larc.nasa.gov (Daring Dale Douglas) writes:

 
|> Hmmmm.... I guess a win over an undefeated Michigan team in the Rose
|> Bowl would not be a big win then?????  Washington will have their
|> chance to show if they deserve the MNC, if nowhere else but in the
|> Bowl game.

Actually it wouldn't be a big win.  After all, FSU showed everybody last 
year the Michigan was just another minor team in the Little Ten. ;-}

I hope that FSU and Charlie Ward play their game and not allow Miami to 
dictate the pace of the game.

FSU 16  -  Miami 14

rick hopkins

            basketball

                N
                |
                |
 baseball W ----+---- E yachting
                |
                |
                S

             football
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: wuck fashington!!!
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 23:20:07 GMT

In article <1992Sep29.210804.15159@beaver.cs.washington.edu> fran@cs.washington.edu (Tak Ming Pang) writes:
>
>Arizona any more. If Miami is good team, they should go to play
>in Africa, see if they can stand the hunger over there.  
^^^^^^^^^^^

huh?!? Did I miss something?

Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: yl44729@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Rick Lin(call me Axl) )
Subject: Re: Miami, Florida
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 21:21:43 GMT

jfrederi@encore.com (Justin Frederich) writes:


>Hell , since run-it-up Johnson has become a 'cow-cane' and Erickson 
>took over the coaching duties , the Canes have slowed down on their
>nastiness. Of course Cane haters will find this very hard to believe
>so they won't believe it. 

>So GO CANES keep on winning - 48 straight in the OB - 22 straight overall.

"Run-it-up" Johnson?  I don't think anyone runs up the score as much as
Jenkins down there in Houston.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tlm1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Terry Matula)
Subject: Re: WEEKLY S.E.C. STANDINGS
Organization: Mississippi State University
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 23:34:12 GMT

azzarito@cse.fau.edu (Doug Azzarito) writes:

>    S.E.C. Western Division Standings

>             S.E.C.  TOTAL
>TEAM         W L T   W L T  Last Week's Results          Next opponent
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Alabama      3 0 0   5 0 0  WON v. S. Carolina, 48-7     at Tulane, 10/10
>Auburn       2 1 0   4 1 0  WON v. Vanderbilt, 31-7      at Miss St., 10/10
>Mississippi  2 2 0   3 2 0  WON v. Kentucky, 24-14       at Arkansas, 10/17
>LSU          1 2 0   1 4 0  LOST v. Tennessee, 20-0      at Florida, 10/10
>Arkansas     1 2 0   1 4 0  LOST v. Georgia, 27-3        at Tenn, 10/10
>Miss. State  1 1 0   3 1 0  WON v. Florida, 30-6         v. Auburn, 10/10

Is this the "official" standings?  Shouldn't Mississippi State be above
LSU and Arkansas, (and maybe Mississippi)?  Or, am I missing something here?

--
Terry Matula
tlm1@ra.msstate.edu
matula@ee.msstate.edu
From: dpassage@soda.berkeley.edu (David G. Paschich)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Pac Ten Review (9/26/92)
Date: 28 Sep 92 15:58:05
Organization: Organization?  Who cares?  You just gotta say "Go Bears!"
	<1992Sep28.170314.8478@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: godfrey@cs.washington.edu's message of Mon, 28 Sep 92 17:03:14 GMT


   In article <1992Sep28.072037.12906@u.washington.edu>, 
	crs@milton.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck) writes:

   >Next Week's games:  (Send your Pac Ten Pundit's Picks by Thursday!!!)
   >
   >USC @ Washington
   >Temple @ Washington State
   >UCLA @ Arizona
   >Arizona State @ Oregon
   >Oregon State @ California
   >Stanford @ Notre Dame
   >California has a bye.

In article <1992Sep28.170314.8478@beaver.cs.washington.edu>, 
	godfrey@cs.washington.edu (Garr Godfrey) writes:

   Then who is Oregon State playing?

Isn't it clear?  Playing Oregon State counts as a bye. :)

David Paschich
GO BEARS!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rajiv@ultra.com (Rajiv Dhingra)
Subject: Penn State QB situation 
Reply-To: rajiv@ultra.com (Rajiv Dhingra)
Organization: Ultra Network Technologies
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 22:07:43 GMT

Can someone please update the quarter-back situation at Penn State.
What happened to Kerry Collins, the pre-season # 1 QB.  The last I
heard of him was that he would be back from a finger injury in game
4, but his name doesn't show up in any of the stats.

Thanx,

Rajiv