HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: be173@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (J. William Snyder, Jr.)
Subject: Re: Beginner's Guide to TCP/IP
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 15:52:00 GMT


Thanks for taking the time to put together the documents
introducing beginners to TCP/IP and making them available via
FTP. Unfortunately, when I attempted to FTP to filbert... and
login as "anonymous", filbert... responded with "unknown command"
Are you sure the system is set to accept anonymous FTP logins?
Thanks es 73,
Will Snyder/KB4LFD
-- 
J. William Snyder, Jr. (Will)
Class of 1992/The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Amateur Packet Radio: KB4LFD@K4IWW.NC.USA.NOAM
Internet: SNYDER@UNCVX1.ACS.UNC.EDU
From: david@kelly.ksc.nasa.GOV
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: JITC
Date: 13 Apr 92 20:12:04 GMT
Article-I.D.: kelly.9E9DC9864
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu



From:
david@kelly.ksc.nasa.gov


I am trying to locate the Joint Interoperability Test Center.  Any
idea where that is??

Dave


+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
   FROM:

   David Sweigert  c/o
   Boeing Aerospace Operations
   M/S  FA-71                              david@kelly.ksc.nasa.gov
   Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899          FAX  407-867-4079
                                           VOICE    867-4848
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: medin@cod.nosc.mil (Ted Medin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Help 2nd try - mail naming convention etc
Date: 13 Apr 92 17:01:39 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego


 Well my first try got 0 responses so try again :-(.

1. What is the prefered protocol for smtp mail addresses?
   handle@host       - ie ted@n6trf
   callsign@host     - ie n6trf@n6trf

2. Several of the pars group have been experimenting with ka9q and all
   phils children. However our problem (or apparent) is we cant get out
   of our valley direct to another tcpip station. The way it appears to 
   me that shuts down all the good stuff. Educate me please on how we can  
   do tcpip connections via netrom (or whatever).
   Remember ignorance can be educated but stupid is forever :-).

 73, ted
From: aw0g+@andrew.cmu.edu (Aaron Wohl)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Macintosh SoftKiss -- software tnc
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:55:58 GMT
Organization: Special Projects, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Softkiss connects a modem directly to a macintosh.  This saves having a
TNC.  Softkiss will work with 300 baud HF, 1200 baud VHF and higher
baudrates.  The software is in the early stages of development and is
not useful in everyday work at this time.

You can send test packets and recieve/print packets at this time.
The test programs are available via anonymous ftp from host
akutaktak.andrew.cmu.edu [128.2.35.1] in /aw0g/softkiss1f.hqx

Changes since the last release:  You can test transmit, recieve,
interrupts, dual port simultainious recieve, support 300 baud,
use power manager on power books/portables.

If you are working on hardware and want to test your hardware
pick up this release.  If you want a complete usable software package
wait for a later release.
Aaron
From: enge@almaden.ibm.com (Roy Engehausen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: NOS under G8BPQ: is it worth it, under what conditions?
Date: 13 Apr 92 04:07:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: ucsd.9204130407.AA25607
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

In serveral cases, people have had great success running BPQ,
DV, NOS, and an AX25 BBS such as mine on a single computer.

So the advantage to using BPQ and NOS is that it allows those ports.
to be used by other programs

Roy, AA4RE
From: david@kelly.ksc.nasa.GOV
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Call for GIGABITS
Date: 9 Apr 92 05:06:29 GMT
Article-I.D.: kelly.9E4875321C
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

From:
David Sweigert c/o
Boeing Aerospace Operations
M/S   FA-71
Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899
407-867-4848

To:
Robert E. Kahn, Corporation for National Research Initiatives
Phillip Gross, Advanced Network and Services, Inc.
Lawerence Landweber, University of Wisconsin
Bernd Bruegge, Carnegie Mellon University

Ref:
GIGABIT Testbed Activity

Background:

  On pages 10-13, March 1992 issue of IEEE Network Magazine, there was
a very interesting article entitled "Where are we with Gigabits".  This
guest editorial referred to all of the gentlemen mentioned above.

Kennedy Activity:

  The KSC is interested in exploring GIGABIT architectures.  In fact,
a small embryonic project has been funded to establish a "test-bed"
of sorts.  This test-bed is not of the academic sophistication level
of others (i.e. AURORA, CASA, etc.), but is a first phase concept
exploration project.

  KSC is interested in testing the feasibility of using a GIGABIT
architecture to consolidate several divergent communication transmission
systems used to support the operations and launch of the Space Shuttle.

Requested Dialoge:

  I am interested in exploring the possibility of communicating with
other individuals to compare notes and lessons learned.  If interested
please reply via e-mail.  Thank you.

Sincerely,

David Sweigert
From: mattis@elixir.lne.kth.se (Mattis Andersson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: WA4DSY 56 kbit/s MODEM ??
Date: 13 Apr 92 14:50:10 GMT
Organization: Dept. of EE, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

Hello !


I would like to know where and how to buy the WA4DSY 56 kbit/s MODEM kit.

I have read about GRAPES, but I have no address or whatsoever.


Mattis Andersson


mattis@elixir.lne.kth.se
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: sro@media-lab.media.mit.edu (Shawn O'Donnell)
Subject: Re: Combined radio/TNC
Organization: M.I.T. Media Laboratory
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 21:57:47 GMT

Besides assorted do-it-yourselfers, there's the new Alinco that's
advertised in all of the latest ham magazines.  It's called the
DR-1200T.  It comes with 25W output, a TNC cable, and 2400 baud
capability.  The microphone is optional!

You can assume that the deviation is set properly for data, and that
the TX/RX switching is fast.  It sounds like you hook it up to a
computer & start transmitting.

I haven't seen one myself.  Has anyone played with one?  

call (310) 616 8616 for info or see QST, 73 or CQ.

--Shawn
From: akcs.ken@vpnet.chi.il.us (ken hopkins)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: HELP ka9q mailers address protocol
Date: 12 Apr 92 16:55:01 CDT
Keywords: ka9q tcpip mail

Hi Ted. I believe the correct syntax is...
hamcall@hamcall.ampr.org. For me that would be
wa9wcp@wa9wcp.ampr.org. You'll see things like
ken@wa9wcp but that's a local issue and requires
an alias file to translate ken back to wa9wcp.
I have the full blown wnos3 including source code
but it has to bee compiled with Turbo C.
Ken wa9wcp@wa9wcp.ampr.org or WA9WCP @ W9ZMR.IL.
From: dug@kd4nc.uucp (Doug Drye KD4NC)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: WA4DSY 56 kbit/s MODEM ??
Date: 14 Apr 92 02:31:57 GMT
Organization: KD4NC HAM Packet Radio Gateway

mattis@elixir.lne.kth.se (Mattis Andersson) writes:
>Hello !
>I would like to know where and how to buy the WA4DSY 56 kbit/s MODEM kit.
>I have read about GRAPES, but I have no address or whatsoever.
>Mattis Andersson
>mattis@elixir.lne.kth.se

Every now and then, I follow-up to one of these requests on the group.

I am the contact for the GRAPES packet group (non-profit packet 
networking organization in N. Ga.. Inquiries can be sent directly
to me at gatech!kd4nc!dug. 

Please include a postal address in case I can't
make your mail path work. 

Sorry for the net.bandwidth usage, but it usually bounces around for a 
few days on the newsgroup, if I don't post a reply. 

I will reply to Mattis directly.

Doug
-- 
Doug Drye KD4NC
From: jangus@skyld.UUCP (Jeff Angus)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: FLEXNET help and contact BAYCOM
Date: 16 Apr 92 23:48:42 GMT
Organization: Grendel's Lair


In article <9204151506.AA27743@ucsd.edu> BTITMARS%ESOC@vm.gmd.DE writes:

  > 
  > Hi all
  > Haveing had a NULL responce from contact with FLEXNET Group in Germany
  > I wish to Know if any one else in the World has had any Luck?? Ive written
  > Emailed ax25 and visited the so called place where its sold and Sitll come
  > come up with a big Nothing..
  > I would like to make contact with BAYCOM Group now to get info on the
  > BAYCOM-NODE think the latest version is Ver 1.5f  it compatible with FLEXNET
  > but with out the hassel of getting the software and the hardware
  > So has any one any contact info THAT is reliable and Likley to respond to
  > Questions.. for BayCom-Node software and SCC hardware
  > OR: if any one has had suscessful contact with the FLEXNET Group.
  > Thanks
  > Email only replies [btitmars@esoc.BITnet]  GM8SAU
  > Thanks Barry.
  > 

PacComm Packet Radio Systems, Inc.
4413 N. Hesperides Street
Tampa, FL 33614-7618
1 813 874-2980 Business office
1 813 875 6417 Technical support
1 813 872 8696 Fax
1 813 874-3078 E-mail

They are now 'the' source for the BayComm group. They (PacComm) have signed
an aggreement with them (BayComm) to handle their product line of hardware
and software.

[Note: Editorial opinion follows]

From the beginning, Florain, DL8MBT and the others have devoted a HUGE amount
of personal effort to Digicom and (now) BayComm and have seen others make a
large profit from their efforts. BayComm has gone commercial to help defray
the costs of development, and have chosen PacComm to act as their distributor.

[End of opinion, return to real world]

--
xenon!skyld!jangus   < This space left blank intentionally. >
J Angus, PO Box 4425, Carson CA 90749-4425 voice (310) 324-6080
From: jeff@markets.amix.com (Jeff Crilly N6ZFX)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: Ripoff Radio? (WAS Re: Combined radio/TNC)
Keywords: n
Date: 13 Apr 92 16:29:44 GMT
Organization: American Information Exchange, Palo Alto, CA

In article <pst.702939920@lager> pst@cisco.com (Paul S. Traina) writes:
>I have an Alinco DR1200T radio and it works quite well.  It is true FM,  and
>while it does NOT come ready-to-run 9600 baud, the modification for the
>G3RUH modem is very simple.
>
>It ran, out of the box,  right away.  It does *NOT* come with a TNC cable,
>but does come with 1/2 of the cable (the mic end).
>
>It's nothing more than a 112T without the microphone and mobile mounting

Does this mean that the 112T is also true FM?

jeff
From: johan@ece.orst.edu (Johan K. Reinalda)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: WG7J NOS 1.01
Date: 8 Apr 92 18:58:59 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

Hi all,
well i've finally gotten around to getting v1.01 out.
It is now in incoming on ucsd.edu (could you please move it, Brian ?)
with new source, exe and docs (src101.zip, wg7j101.exe and wg7jdoc.zip)

All this, and a few other configuration executables can also be found
on wg7j.ece.orst.edu.

Some new features are:
- Tracing to a session or to the command screen. (you can disable this
from the command line to save 4 kb memory). F9 will toggle to the trace
session from any other session (this is modified code from wnos sources)

-Function key session switching. F1-F8 will switch to sessions 1-8
from any other session, IF they are NOT defined as function keys

-inactivity timeouts in the mailbox, the ftpserver and netrom l4

-bid's in the history file have a timestamp.
 new 'oldbid' command will delete old bid's from the history file
 (and also update old pre-datestamp entries with a datestamp)

-very simple message expiration; inspired by Bernie Roehl's expire.c
a process can be configured to run every n hours; it checks a control
file /spool/expire.dat for filenames with maximum age value (in days)
All messages older then the maximum are deleted (after the whole file
is backed up...)

-you can now exclude names from the mailbeacon with 'mbox mailfor exclude'

-mailbox commands
LL,SR are fixed from 1.0
new SC to send with carbon copy, RH same as V, and XM to set more prompting
More prompting now works in any mode, not just telnet login's

- R-header interpretation now takes all of @:xxx, @xxx, ?:xxx and ?xxx

- NTS message deletion; in order to allow users to deliver traffic
and then delete the message in the area, ALL users can delete ANY message
in areas starting with "nts" ... so ntslocal, nts, ntsor all work

-BuckMaster CDRom support
This code was send to me and i've added it as is. It has NOT been tested
by me, and is provided as is... It is not in the standard distribution,
but there is an executable on wg7j.ece that has the code compiled in.

There are a few other little things; see the readme.now file
Please also read the minimanual wg7jmods.txt in wg7jdoc.zip
(also has help files as i use them)

Enjoy,

Johan,
WG7J/PA3DIS
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: payne@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Andrew Payne)
Subject: Re: Poor Man's packet & modem
Organization: Cornell Theory Center
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 00:06:12 GMT

In article <N1FsiB2w165w@micromed.net.netcom.com> msolinas@micromed.net.netcom.com (Michael Solinas) writes:
>Can a standard modem be used with poor man's packet?  I have a zoom 
>external, and can purchase some used hayes modems (1200 baud) for $15.  
>Can these be used with PMP?

No.  In general most telephone modems *cannot* be used for 1200 baud packet.
Most UHF/VHF 1200 baud packet uses Bell 202, which is a half-duplex FSK 
protocol.  Some old, old modems implement this protocol but you don't
find them around much anymore:  they usually get thrown away.




-- 
=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =
Andrew C. Payne, N8KEI        UUCP:  ...!cornell!batcomputer!payne
                          INTERNET:  payne@tc.cornell.edu
From: akcs.ken@vpnet.chi.il.us (ken hopkins)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: tcp/ip beginner
Date: 8 Apr 92 20:55:03 CDT
Keywords: tcp/ip

Hi All. I'm a new user of tcp/ip and have about
a thousand questions. Rather than clutter up this
system with all 1,000, wonder if someone can point
me to a good tutorial, beginner's guide or similar?
Most of my questions relate to routing and similar.
Thanks for your help!
Ken wa9wcp@wa9aek [44.72.1.162]
From: medin@cod.nosc.mil (Ted Medin)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: HELP ka9q mailers address protocol
Keywords: ka9q tcpip mail
Date: 8 Apr 92 18:43:05 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego


  Need your input on the syntax for mail addresses with the tcpip packages.
Do we use the similar internet syntax ie name@host ? Which i think for ampr
would be handle@callsign. Or what?

  BTW anyone know where i can get the binaries for the full blown wnos3
variant of the ka9q package. The binaries at ucsd do not have netrom ... .

73, ted
n6trf
From: ham!emd@oneb.wimsey.bc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: Packet-Radio Digest, why???
Date: 14 Apr 92 03:48:04 GMT
Organization: Mid Island Ham Network

coleve@cc.uvcc.edu writes:

> In article <9204110704.AA01574@uwspmail.uwsp.edu>, Packet-Radio@ucsd writes:
> > 
> > Packet-Radio Digest         Sat, 11 Apr 92       Volume 92 : Issue  96
> > 
> > Today's Topics:
> >                  Beginner's Guide to TCP/IP (2 msgs)
> >                              D-410 reply
> >                      How do I kill kiss on tnc2?
> >                            More on GIGABIT
> >    printed circuit diagram or 2Mbps datalink in 1991 ARRL handbook
> >                            tcp/ip beginner
> >               Why segregate TCP/IP? (was Re: kbd to kbd)
> > 
> 
> Ummm - I have the feeling of deja-vu here.
> 
> This digest is, I am sure, wonderful for folks on a mailing list who do not
> get the newsgroups.  I was on the mailing list myself once, and really
> appreciated it.  But why are we cluttering up the netnews bandwidth with a 
> _second_ copy of all these messages?
> 
> Can't it be filtered somehow?
> 
> Just asking - not grumping,

Yes, please. All these digests seem to be repeats of previously posted 
Usenet articles. Please stop sending them to Usenet if that is the case.


Robert Smits  VE7EMD Nanaimo B.C. Ph (604) 753-4119          
e-mail: ham!emd@oneb.wimsey.bc.ca Fax (604) 753-4143            
PACKET VE7EMD@VE7KIT.#VANC.BC.CAN.NOAM                             

                                         
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: kingdon@cs.columbia.edu (John Kingdon)
Subject: Need Info:  2400 baud 2M packet in NY.
Organization: Columbia University Department of Computer Science
Distribution: ny
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 16:35:06 GMT


I can't seem to find out any information about 2400 baud 2Mtr packet
radio in and around the NYC area.  If you have ANY information about
2400 Baud activity (BBSes, Net/Rom nodes, TCP/IP, personal stations)
*please* send it to me -- I have been here in NYC for 3 months now and
still habe not found any 2400 baud activity!!

please e-mail response to me: kingdon@cs.columbia.edu

Thanks!

73s de John KA3VJH
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Kingdon KA3VJH                            e-mail   kingdon@cs.columbia.edu
Department of Computer Science                                     NeXTMail ok!
Columbia University                                   New York , New York 10027
From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: HELP
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:32:40 GMT
Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Gannett Technologies Group

In article <9204140320.AA16839@ucsd.edu> asqp-nbf@zama-emh1.army.mil (ASQP-NBF) writes:
>I have a problem and I hope that I'm not the only one.
>Could someone explain in SIMPLE terms whats the difference
>between NOS,TCIP/IP, TNC 1 and 2,KA9?, and running a KAM or MFJ 1278
>TNC.

Well, I'll take a stab at it.

NOS 	This stands for Network Operating System, a bit of braggadocio
	describing the latest versions of Phil Karn, KA9Q's, implementation
	of TCP/IP for amateurs. It's a program that runs under DOS on PCs
	that implements the TCP/IP protocol stack and several clients and
	servers such as telnet, ftp, and smtp. Older versions of the program
	were simply called NET and have been ported to the Mac, Amiga, and
	various Unix boxes. There are now several flavors of NOS by different
	implementors. They all interoperate and generally follow Phil's
	original work.

TCP/IP	Transmission Control Protocol, Internet Protocol. This is a protocol
	stack originally developed for DOD use to interconnect different
	computers over diverse link level networks. In amateur practice,
	it allows data streams to be interchanged between different kinds
	of computers over the AX25 link level networks. It is nominally
	a datagram system that theoretically has the ability to route
	each packet individually over the current best route while maintaining
	data integrity through end to end acknowledgements. It is the most
	widely used computer networking protocol stack.	

TNC1	This is an obsolete bit of hardware developed by TAPR, the Tucson
	Amateur Packet Radio organization. It was the first widely available
	TNC kit based on a Motorola processor.

TNC2	This was the second TNC designed by TAPR. It and it's clones are
	the standard amateur TNC. It's based on the popular Z80 chipset.

KAM	This is one of the wonder boxes, others are the AEA PK232 and
	the MFJ1278. These so called multi-mode units can do packet,
	RTTY, WEFAX, and CW. (A personal aside: like most do everything
	systems, they do nothing particularly well.) They are fine for
	people who wish to sample several operating modes.

Gary KE4ZV
From: tjones@willamette.edu (Tyler Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Help with KISS and a PK-232MBX
Keywords: KA9Q KISS
Date: 10 Apr 92 04:38:08 GMT
Article-I.D.: willamet.1992Apr10.043808.25886
Organization: Willamette University, Salem, OR

In our Digital Communications class here at Willamette University, our group's
project involves using ka9q on a couple of TNCs (PK-232MBX TNCs to be exact). 
The documentation for ka9q describes how to activate KISS mode on the PK-232
(first you activate KISS mode using some terminal program, then run ka9q), but
it doesn't work on TNCs.  We are using PC Packrat as the terminal program, and
are sending commands to the TNC.  It works fine until we hit the command KISS
ON, at which time no other commands may be entered, and the only solution is
to exit the program and reset the TNC.  Our professor has been no help, as he
has never used KISS mode on these TNCs.  If anyone can help, and/or has used
ka9q with IBM compatable machines, please respond via e-mail.  Thank you.
tjones@willamette.edu
 
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: payne@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Andrew Payne)
Subject: Re: FLEXNET help and contact BAYCOM
Organization: Cornell Theory Center
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 16:54:17 GMT

In article <703468122snx@skyld.UUCP> jangus@skyld.UUCP (Jeff Angus) writes:
>[Note: Editorial opinion follows]
>
>From the beginning, Florain, DL8MBT and the others have devoted a HUGE amount
>of personal effort to Digicom and (now) BayComm and have seen others make a
>large profit from their efforts. BayComm has gone commercial to help defray
>the costs of development, and have chosen PacComm to act as their distributor.

[Soapbox on]

Unfortuantely, I'm afraid that "others making a profit from their efforts" is
largely their fault.  They waited far too long to "go commercial".  They've
been approached by several companies who wanted to market their hardware and
software and these companies were turned away (so I've heard).

When you label something as freely distributable, you are giving it away.
To expect any compensation is absurd.  I've gotten less than $100 in 
shareware-type donations for my Poor Man's Packet program and I'm surprised
I've gotten this much.

I'm not discounting the work of the Baycom team.  They've put a lot of
effort into Baycom and it is a wonderful program.  However, a little more
business sense on their part might have made their lives happier.  I hope
their deal with PacComm works out for them.
-- 
=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =
Andrew C. Payne, N8KEI        UUCP:  ...!cornell!batcomputer!payne
                          INTERNET:  payne@tc.cornell.edu
From: Pat.Dockrey@f3.n346.z1.fido.iea.hmm (Pat Dockrey)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: automatic control (was: Help 2nd try tcpip ka9q problem)
Date: 8 Apr 92 22:11:20 GMT

This is no doubt a very contentious problem...but I completely disagree with
the concept of not having an amateur responsible for their transmissions.
Personal responsibility goes to the heart of the amateur radio hobby. It may
very well be that PBBS' will have to undergo a drastic change in the
future...however, that seems to me a better route than approaching the FCC with
the idea of relieving certain stations of any responsiblity for their actions.
This experiment has already been done on 11 meters, and the result is one which
the FCC would probably rather not repeat.
Even the phone boards have restrictions on content, why should the PBBS' be any
different? If you want to run a PBBS, then you have to be aware of the current
regulations covering unattended forwarding, and be willing to abide by them. 
 
pat  nq7m

 * Origin: Radio Therapy BBS * 509.534.7924 * (1:346/3)
From: dstrout@next32.isnet.com (Dave Strout)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Cheapest packet-capable rig?
Date: 9 Apr 92 01:35:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: next32.1992Apr9.013531.1119
Reply-To: dstrout@next32.isnet.com (Dave Strout)
Distribution: usa
Organization: is a sign of a sick mind...

What is the absolute minimum set up to run 2400 bps packet?  How about  
9600?  I'm new to this (like you couldn't tell?) and would appreciate any  
advice, experiences, recomendations, etc.

dave.
-- 
Dave Strout
NeXT Programmer
dstrout@next32.isnet.com  <-- Should work...
...uunet!ihost!next32!dstrout  <-- Else try this....