HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: murphy@rock.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Best looking cheerleaders in college
Date: 23 Nov 92 17:37:28 GMT
Reply-To: murphy@rock.enet.dec.com ()
Distribution: usa
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


In article <1992Nov23.153502.10489@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, jcopelan@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (The One and Only) writes:
|> Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
|> Path: ryn.mro4.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!jcopelan
|> From: jcopelan@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (The One and Only)
|> Subject: Best looking cheerleaders in college
|> Message-ID: <1992Nov23.153502.10489@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
|> Sender: news@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
|> Nntp-Posting-Host: top.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
|> Organization: Heavy Petting Zoo
|> Distribution: usa
|> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 15:35:02 GMT
|> Lines: 17
|> 
|> Well, it's that time of year again.  We all know that Ohio State has the
|> best marching band (I believe it was empirically proven here a few weeks
|> ago).  And Miami has the best college football team in world history.  There
|> is only one question left to be decided: which college has the best looking
|> cheerleaders?
|> 
|> This weekend should provide ample ;-) evidence that the University of
|> Southern California has without a doubt the best looking cheerleaders. 
|> There should be plenty of gratuitous coverage of these buxom beauties when
|> USC plays Note Dame on Saturday.  They just can't be denied.

Methinks Oklahoma and UNLV would give them a great fight.

|> jc
|> -- 
|> 
|> What we really need to do to bring peace to the middle-east
|> is to get the Jews together with the Muslims
|> and teach them to act like good Christians.
|> 
Organization: Sophomore, Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 18:22:23 -0500 
From: William Karamo Motley <wm1o+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: PAC-10 HYPE
Distribution: na

In an article <1992Nov15.213717.22965@leland.Stanford.EDU 
elsonliu@leland.Stanford.EDU (Liu) writes:

>It was definitely an interesting Saturday this week.  Arizona upset by USC,
>Washington St. upset by Stanford, Washington crushing Oregon St.  It seems
>like there are a five strong teams in the conference this year - Washington,
>Stanford, USC, Washington St., Arizona.  No MNC contenders, but methinks any
>could be spoilers for such contenders...
> 
>.....Elson.....

Elson, do you realize what you're saying?  Washington can put themselves
back into National Championship contention!  If the pollsters realize
that BAMA and TAMU are overrated, and Miami and FSU happen to loose
their respective bowls, and Washington wins the rest of its games and
wins the Rose Bowl, then Washington is the National Champ.  Now, the
chances of all of these things happening are slim, but Washington is not
out of the National Championship picture.

Will

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: wcarroll@encore.com (William Carroll)
Subject: Re: SEC What if?
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 22:12:55 GMT

ellingrw@infonode.ingr.com (Bob Ellington) writes:
>Now, "IF" Florida had lost and Georgia had lost, Tennesse would then
>get a rematch with Alabama in the SEC Championship game.  But alas, it
>was not meant to be.  Florida could still lose to Vandy this week and
>put Georgia in the "Game".  


The fun one is if UF beats Vandy, then loses to FSU and Bama. That
would almost certainly leave them ranked lower than UGa, which would
give the Citrus Bowl the option of picking a higher-ranked UGa over
a runner-up UF. Not quite as ludicrous as the possibility of SU beating
UM only to have the conference title handed to the blowhards anyway, but
fun nonetheless.



William R. Carroll (Encore Computer, Ft. Lauderdale FL) wcarroll@encore.com

"We trained hard,  but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form
up into teams, we would be reorganized.  I was to learn later in life that
we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing;  and a wonderful method
it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion,
inefficiency, and demoralization."	-Petronius Arbiter, 210 BC
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: scott@ods.com (Scott Harper)
Subject: Re: FLORIDA OVER ALABAMA. GOTTA HAVE IT!
Organization: Optical Data Systems, Inc.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 15:49:45 GMT

DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE (delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu) wrote:
:   I am making a statement to all Florida fans, a plea if you will....
:   
:   PLEASE, WHOOP IT UP!! BEAT THE LIVING YOU-KNOW-WHAT OUT OF ALABAMA!!!!!
:   AFTER ALL, YOU HAVE STEVE SPURRIER, FORMER COACH OF DUKE....

YEAH, BUT PLEASE WHOOP IT UP AND BEAT THE LIVING YOU-KNOW-WHAT OUT
OF FSU FIRST!!!!

(an Aggie fan looking at our only real chance to PLAY for the MNC)
-- 
Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081
From: cubbie@garnet.berkeley.edu (                               )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: OSU beats Michigan: 13-13
Date: 23 Nov 1992 03:42:38 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu

If a passing game of 28 of 34 for 271 yards and 1 TD is 2nd best in OSU
history, it well says about the potent passing attack of the Buckeyes.



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: atchison@lyre.cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark Atchison)
Subject: Re: fichigan fumbles
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 14:21:02 GMT

In article <ASH.92Nov16085655@ulysses.mr.ams.com> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:
>In article <1992Nov15.002637.17707@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> exby@pogo.Colorado.EDU (|J| Exby) writes:
>
>   >I got two words for ya fichigan folk:
>   >national championship.
>   >WRONG!
>   >Sure made this illini alum happy to at least kick the wolves
>   >out of the national championship lottery...
>   >makes amends for some rather pathetic games this year.
>   >c'mon buckeys, do it to em next.  fichigan blows.
>   >::j
>
>
>Don't listen to him, people.  He's just an anti-Michigan stooge.
>Exby's anti-Michigan sentiments are well-know on the net, so take
>anything he posts about Michigan with a truckload of salt.  That'll
>make the truckload of bullshit taste better.

Don't listen to him, people.  He's just a pro-Michigan stooge.
Harder's pro-Michigan sentiments are well-know on the net, so take
anything he posts about Michigan with a truckload of salt.  That'll
make the truckload of wolverine dung taste better.

>-Alan Harder
>These opinions are mine.  You can't have them.  Stop, thief!

One valid complaint about all the vulgar, childish, and pathetic "MU tied"
posts would have been fine.  I don't think individual replies of similar form
to each offending post are necessary.  Of course, you may just be showing off
the superior writing ability gleaned from that "Harvard of the West", where
good athletes go so they can get a better education! :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)

GO BUCKS!!! [insert your own vulgar, unprintable verb here] BLUE!!!
-- 
_______________________________________________________________________________
 Mark Atchison, a.k.a. <atchison@cis.ohio-state.edu>; Graduate Student in the
Computer Science Dept, THE Ohio State University (NOT an Ohio State University)
		Any plagiarisms seen above are not my own...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner)
Subject: Re: All AP & CNN/USA pollsters, read this
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 23:57:44 GMT


>>Bottom line, the only explanation I can see for this is margin of victory.
>>Miami has schedule strength, they have Won/lost/tie total, they have defense,
>> etc...  Does anyone out there realize that Iowa, Arizona, FSU, PSU, TCU, 
							     ^^^
>>and Temple all had their WORST offensive point totals against Miami???
		 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
>FSU got 16 points against Miami, but only 13 against Virginia.
>
>
>D. Head
>FSU `91

Ok, and we already know that Miami didn't hold TCU to their lowest score,
either.  Meeks, is any of this correct?

GT
From: kkc@nursing.arizona.edu (Kee Koon Chua)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: AP make FSU #3
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:03:52 GMT
Reply-To: kkc@nursing.arizona.edu
Organization: University of Arizona - College of Nursing

>>AP
>>
>>1. Miami
>>2. Alabama
>>3. FSU
>>4. Texas A&M
>>
>>FSU jumps over Texas A&M, with a blow out with Tulane.
>>
>>Well the polls MO POINTS rule raises it's ugly head again.  With FSU >and
>>Bama both playing Florida, it will be a shootout for MO POINTS. The >most
>>POINTS could get the #2 spot. Both Bama and FSU will be taken out the
>
>At least the "HEY I'M UNDEFEATED I DESERVE IT" rule didn't rear it's
>head again.  TAMU has had the shittiest schedule out of the top five
>atleast.  I mean, almost everyone in the PAC-10(I'm not a PAC-10 fan,
>just giving credit where credit is due) has had a better schedule than
>A&M. What legitimate squad has A&M beaten to claim that #3 spot???? 
>Hopefully the USA TODAY/CNN poll will have FSU at #2 ahead of Alabama
>and TAMU.  Alabama also has had a shit schedule and they have not played
>anyone worth mentioning to claim that #2 spot.  Their toughest opponent
>was Tennessee.  FSU barely lost to Miami on Miami's home field and has
>rolled over everyone else they played, whereas BAMA just got by
>Mississippi State, who's not even ranked!  Arizona's schedule has been
>tougher than Alabama's and TAMU's crap schedules combined!
>
>Will

    I couldn't agree with you better. I hope all the brainless pollsters 
(especially the one in Tucson Az who voted Bama #1) out there could put more 
weights in schedule strength.
From: rrm@icf.hrb.com (MURPH)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Penn State Should Withdraw
Date: 18 Nov 92 11:39:56 EST
Organization: HRB Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Nov17.184654.5511@newssun.med.miami.edu>, dbrown@newssun.med.miami.edu (Daniel Brown) writes:
> In article <168A2A8EA.JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com> JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com writes:
>>This posting is for all the Penn State assholes who said last year that
> 			     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Do we really need this antagonism on the net?
> 

 In short, YES. All year all we heard was how good Penn State is going to be
and how they almost won the close ones. They lost the close ones, no matter
how big of margin there was. Yeah they sure did beat up on the teams with
losing records, but to bad they can't beat a ranked team. 

                                                 Murph
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rhett@utkvx2.utk.edu (Fitzsimmons, Marc)
Subject: SEC What if?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Tennessee Computing Center
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:57:00 GMT

If Florida had lost Saturday to South carolina, Tennessee and Florida would be
tied for second place. So Ut gets the bid from the head to head win. But could
they refuse the offered bowl for the Hall of Fame in Tampa? or would they have
to goto the contracted conference bowl?

Organization: Sophomore, Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 12:32:07 -0500 
From: William Karamo Motley <wm1o+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Dick Vitale on football

In an article <1992Nov20.182458.19801@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>
tino@yogi.metray (Vinny Tino) writes:

>Anyone here good ol' Dickie V's comments on the FSU-A&M controversy last night
>during the Seton Hall-Delaware basketball game?  Hate to say it but Dick NEVER
>went to FSU....(sounds like he sure knows his football though!!)

No, I didn't hear DV's comments.  Could you please post it?  Judging by
the tone of your post, I can tell that it wasn't good for A&M, though.

Thanks in advance,
Will



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: scott@ods.com (Scott Harper)
Subject: Re: A&M beats TCU...
Organization: Optical Data Systems, Inc.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:22:57 GMT

John Phillips (jphillip@comanche.ess.harris.com) wrote:
: >Mark Weyland writes
: 
: > Just to shut them up.  (they, 
: >r.s.f.c fsu, sure do talk a lot of shit)
: 
: As you found out last year in Cotton-A&M bowl, we also come to play.
: Oh yeah, if you show up this year, bring an offense. There were an 
: awful lot of cold lips at last years game.

Just what was it the you (the r.s.f.c. fsu fans) were playing with
at the Cotton Bowl?  :^)

You (the r.s.f.c fsu fans) have at least as much impact on how you
team peforms as we (the r.s.f.c aggie fans) do ours...
-- 
Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: treincke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Tim Reincke)
Subject: Re: Holiday Bowl (Illinois or MSU)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 21:03:27 GMT

tshannon@ccad.uiowa.edu (Timothy J Shannon) writes:

>	Unless MSU and Illinios end in a tie, then if Iowa wins, they go
>to the Holiday bowl.

No, Iowa has accepted a bid to the Copper Bowl in Tuscon, Arizona.  No
matter what Iowa does against the Gophers, they will be going to the
Copper Bowl, not to the Holiday Bowl.  The Holiday Bowl has declared
that they will take the winner of the Illinois-MSU game.

Go Illini!

- Tim
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Reincke                         | Email to: treincke@uiuc.edu
Junior, Computer Science                   |-------------------------------- 
CCSO Resource Information Consultant       |   G o  I l l i n i  B e a t 
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |    T h e  S p a r t a n s
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Blow ye winds, Like the trumpet blows; But without that noise." - J. Handey
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jeffq@bang.sps.mot.com (Jeff Quinn)
Subject: Re: TEXAS aTm - got screwed
Organization: Motorola Inc., Austin Tx.
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:21:30 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.152500.26712@ods.com> scott@ods.com (Scott Harper) writes:
>K. S. Manu (manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU) wrote:
>: You talked about FSU squeaking by.. How about A&M. They seueaked
>: by a Texas Tech by 1 point, the same team which was beaten by
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^             
>: 35 pts by a not-so-hot OU. They squeaked past a not-so-hot
>: stanford by 3 points. They defeated Baylor by 3-points at
>                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>: home, the same baylor which lost by 20 pts to Colorado.
>: Then recently, they defeated a Houston team by 4 pts which
                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>: was beaten 63-3 by Michigan! Yes, A&M is sure playing like
>: a champion.
>-- 
>Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
>scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
>(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081

FYI: Texas A&M 19 Texas Tech 17
     Texas A&M 19 Baylor 13
     Texas A&M 38 Houston 30

Check your math Scott!


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rwood1@artin.helios.nd.edu (richard wood)
Subject: Re: Cotton Powder Puffs!
Reply-To: rwood1@artin.helios.nd.edu (richard wood)
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 03:40:04 GMT

Don't be so quick to call other teams wimpy...

the Huskies just got "thumped" by lowly Wash St.


Go Irish!!!!!
From: freshlt@quig12.alleg.edu (Timothy Freshly)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: OSU beats Michigan: 13-13
Date: 22 Nov 92 18:17:14 GMT
Organization: Allegheny College

In article <1992Nov22.022704.5756@desire.wright.edu>  
demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man) writes:
[stuff deleted]

> 	Cooper:  Really, fire a guy with the best OSU record in 7  
years?  I
> think not.  Sure, he has to learn that the Enormous Eleven is *the*  
focus of
> OSU football.  But his recruiting is starting to pay off.  We have  
Hoying for
> the next three years and Smith for another two.  Plus some talented  
receivers
> and backs returning.  Let's not be hasty with the axe.  What coach  
in their
> right mind would come to a school that fired an 8-2-1 coach?  Even  
if Cooper
> lost to Michigan and in the Citrus Bowl, OSU is 8-4.  An  
improvement over past
> years.  And, as we saw, when a coach is thinking about his job  
instead of 
[more stuff deleted]

	In addition, Cooper has really improved the graduation rate  
among OSU football players.  I think it's around 80% (in five years).   
Can anyone at OSU back this up?  Thanks.

					Tim

-- NewsGrazer, a NeXTstep(tm) news reader, posting --
M>UQR=&8P7&%N<VE[7&9O;G1T8FQ<9C!<9FUO9&5R;B!#;W5R:65R.UQF,5QF
M=&5C:"!3>6UB;VP[?0I<;6%R9VPQ,C`*7&UA<F=R,3(P"EQP87)D7'1X.38P
M7'1X,3DR,%QT>#(X.#!<='@S.#0P7'1X-#@P,%QT>#4W-C!<='@V-S(P7'1X
M-S8X,%QT>#@V-#!<='@Y-C`P7&8P7&(P7&DP7'5L,%QF<S(T($EN(&%R=&EC
M;&4@/#$Y.3).;W8R,BXP,C(W,#0N-3<U-D!D97-I<F4N=W)I9VAT+F5D=3X@
M9&5M;VY`9&5S:7)E+G=R:6=H="YE9'4@*%-T=7!E;F1O=7,@36%N*2!W<FET
M97,Z7`I;<W1U9F8@9&5L971E9%U<"EP*"CX@"4-O;W!E<CH@(%)E86QL>2P@
M9FER92!A(&=U>2!W:71H('1H92!B97-T($]352!R96-O<F0@:6X@-R!Y96%R
M<S\@($E<"CX@=&AI;FL@;F]T+B`@4W5R92P@:&4@:&%S('1O(&QE87)N('1H
M870@=&AE($5N;W)M;W5S($5L979E;B!I<R`J=&AE*B!F;V-U<R!O9EP*/B!/
M4U4@9F]O=&)A;&PN("!"=70@:&ES(')E8W)U:71I;F<@:7,@<W1A<G1I;F<@
M=&\@<&%Y(&]F9BX@(%=E(&AA=F4@2&]Y:6YG(&9O<EP*/B!T:&4@;F5X="!T
M:')E92!Y96%R<R!A;F0@4VUI=&@@9F]R(&%N;W1H97(@='=O+B`@4&QU<R!S
M;VUE('1A;&5N=&5D(')E8V5I=F5R<UP*/B!A;F0@8F%C:W,@<F5T=7)N:6YG
M+B`@3&5T)W,@;F]T(&)E(&AA<W1Y('=I=&@@=&AE(&%X92X@(%=H870@8V]A
M8V@@:6X@=&AE:7)<"CX@<FEG:'0@;6EN9"!W;W5L9"!C;VUE('1O(&$@<V-H
M;V]L('1H870@9FER960@86X@."TR+3$@8V]A8V@_("!%=F5N(&EF($-O;W!E
M<EP*/B!L;W-T('1O($UI8VAI9V%N(&%N9"!I;B!T:&4@0VET<G5S($)O=VPL
M($]352!I<R`X+30N("!!;B!I;7!R;W9E;65N="!O=F5R('!A<W1<"CX@>65A
M<G,N("!!;F0L(&%S('=E('-A=RP@=VAE;B!A(&-O86-H(&ES('1H:6YK:6YG
M(&%B;W5T(&AI<R!J;V(@:6YS=&5A9"!O9B!<"EMM;W)E('-T=69F(&1E;&5T
M961=7`I<"@E);B!A9&1I=&EO;BP@0V]O<&5R(&AA<R!R96%L;'D@:6UP<F]V
M960@=&AE(&=R861U871I;VX@<F%T92!A;6]N9R!/4U4@9F]O=&)A;&P@<&QA
M>65R<RX@($D@=&AI;FL@:70G<R!A<F]U;F0@.#`E("AI;B!F:79E('EE87)S
M*2X@($-A;B!A;GEO;F4@870@3U-5(&)A8VL@=&AI<R!U<#\@(%1H86YK<RY<
8"EP*"0D)"0D*7&8Q(%0*7&8P(&EM"GT*
`
From: mln@sunkj.larc.nasa.gov (Michael L Nelson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Va Tech-UVa Woof
Date: 17 Nov 1992 16:40:36 GMT
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA  USA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: sunkj.larc.nasa.gov
Keywords: woof woof wimper

This Saturday, the game I have waited 366 *long* days for.
After taking a 38-0 spanking last year, and much verbal 
abuse from all UVa fans, I hunger for this game.

Va Tech has racked up an underwhelming 2-7-1 record.

4 of those losses were after leading in the 4th quarter:
ECU (3 points), Louisville (3-4 points?), Rutgers (1 point)
, Southern Miss (1 point)

The tie, NC State, was after leading in the 4th quarter:

of the 3 losses:
Miami - not even close to being in the same league
Syracuse - not in the same league, but did play them tough
West Virginia - lost fair and square (9 points), but could
  probably win a rematch

So, Va Tech is obviously better than some teams with similar
records (TCU, Tulane, etc)

UVa on the other hand started the season off with a bang.
They were pounding patsies left and right.  When they blew
a 28 point lead to a mediocre Clemson squad, they lost their
very soul that day.  They have dropped 4 straight IA game
(only beating IAA William and Mary in the interim)

In their loss to NC State @ Charlottesville, their QB and 
coaches were booed by the home team.  The local media 
(controlled by Va Tech stooges, no doubt) have tried to make
an issue of finger pointing within the UVa team.

Most UVa types say the game has little to no meaning; certainly
not as much as the righteous hokies place on it.  But this year,
UVa's only hopes of a bowl bid ride on this game.  Will this 
be enough to fire up UVa?  Have they already packed it in for
the season?

Beamer is 1-4 against UVa.  Since he is not producing bowl teams,
and not winning against Rival U., I suspect that a embarrassing
loss will make his job contingent on a bowl game next season.

I, for one, will not consider the season a loss, even going 3-7-1,
if we beat UVa.  I have to work and play with UVa grads and fans.
This is the most important game in the world.  :-)

Michael Nelson

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn)
Subject: Re: OSU beats Michigan: 13-13
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 16:40:53 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.150630.24448@bnr.ca> lowery@bnr.ca (Gary Lowery) writes:

>Hey OSU fans,  hype it up all you want, you still haven't beaten Michigan
>in 5 tries.  That's right 0-4-1.  When was your last Rose bowl appearance?
>You guys choke every year.  Next year it is in Ann Arbor.  We will win that
>one also.  Can your coach.  He's out of there.  OSU still sucks! Get back
>down to earth.  A tie still means MICHIGAN is unbeaten in its last 5 games
>against OSU.  The streak goes on......

     Funny you should mention the Rose Bowl, Gary. When you think choking, 
you've got think of Bo choking back rage as he lost Rose Bowl after Rose Bowl
after Rose Bowl...and Mo's got the hang of it, too. Remember last year in
Pasadena? Ooooo, I'm sure you want to forget that, huh? Watching Desmond get
stuffed was sweet, if vicarious, revenge for that Heisman-pose crap he pulled
in Columbus. Why can't all Michigan fans/players have the class of someone like
Bill Mangione-Smith? How many wins do you people need to have before you are 
secure enough to be gracious in (near-)defeat? Sheesh...

                                        Steve
///
-- 
    Steve Casburn (scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)
    They gave me differential calculus, and I said "Hit me again"
    So they gave me integral calculus, and I said "Hit me again"
    Now I have vector calculus, and...I'm starting to lose consciousness...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jay@puppsr5.Princeton.EDU (Jay Shrauner)
Subject: Re: Cal gets beat by former head coach Bruce Snyder
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:01:17 GMT

In article <17617@borg.cs.unc.edu> chen@borodin.cs.unc.edu (Super Dave) writes:
>In article <BxtLyE.BC6.1@cs.cmu.edu> bnoble+@cs.cmu.edu (Brian Noble) writes:
>>  - The Big Game is in Berkeley.  At least it'll be weird.

That is for sure.

>Can somebody over there tell me what time the Big Game kicks off?
>Also, will it be televised?  Thanks.

I think kickoff is at 12:30 Pacific, 3:30 east coast.  
Anyone in the NYC area should know there is a get together in the city
to watch the game, because it's not going to be broadcast here.  The Stanford
alumni club is having a party, but not with the Cal alums this year (maybe they
didn't like having us around gloating last year?).  I assume the Cal people will
have something going as well.

Jay Shrauner
Pound Cal!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college