HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Stephen Gibson
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: re: trident 8900c 1meg
Keywords: trident, windows, svga
Date: 7 Nov 92 01:46:36 GMT
Organization: Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA


In article <BxB1oH.JG1@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> nordstro@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (billy nordstrom) writes:
>is the trident 8900c svga 1meg card good for
>windows?  and is $70 appropriate to pay for 
>this card?  i just wanted to get 640x480x256
>out of windows, and i was wondering if this
>is a good deal/performance...  oh, and yes,
>i want it to be good enough of an upgrade from
>my paradise 256k so that when i get a better
>monitor, i won't have to upgrade again.
>and also, is this trident compatible with
>a non-multisync monitor?  i just have an
>analog packard bell monitor.  
>
>thanx in advance!
>
>----------------------------------tear here-------------------------------------
>nordstro@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
>gwar@symphony.cc.purdue.edu (NeXT)
>----------------------------------tear here-------------------------------------
>
>
>
>-- 
>----------------------------------fold here------------------------------------
>   "oki oki chin chin desu!"          | nordstro@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
>          (*^_^*)                     | gwar@symphony.cc.purdue.edu (NeXT)
>----------------------------------tear here------------------------------------

Save your money.  Trident cards are NOTORIOUSLY slow.  You will not be 
satisfied with the performance.  Add on an additional $100 and get a Diamond 
SpeedSTAR 24X (no flames, please).  Even with some bugs, the SpeedSTAR 24X 
is light years ahead of the Trident-based cards.

Stephen Gibson
Sonoma State University
eMAIL:  gibsonst@sonoma.edu
        Stephen.Gibson@sonoma.edu
From: dmmatt@bigez (Mike Mattix)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Canon Bubble Jet Driver for Windows
Date: 8 Nov 92 21:31:17 GMT
Organization: Monsanto Agricultural Company
Nntp-Posting-User: drboll

In article <1992Nov5.014734.18475@julian.uwo.ca>, plenson@hi_presure_lab (Peter Lenson) writes:
> Hi, does any one have a Canon Bubble Jet driver for windows, and could  
> they post it.
> 
> thanx Peter Lenson.

  There is a Bubble Jet driver shipped with Windows 3.1.  Which BJ are you
using.  Also I believe the current windows driver directories are located on
ftp.uu.net in the /vendors/microsoft area.  I am currently using a BJ300 with
the drivers shipped with Win3.1 and have no trouble.


-- 
Mike Mattix
Agricultural Group of Monsanto
P.O. Box 174
Luling, LA 70070
INTERNET Address: dmmatt@bigez.monsanto.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: killer@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Francis J Park)
Subject: DR DOS 6.0 and Windows 3.1 - doesn't start 
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 13:11:40 GMT

I was running DR DOS 6.0 under Win3.1 and had to reinstall.

Now, when I run Win3.1 I have to set up using /WINSTD on the EMM386.SYS
provided with DR DOS 6.0, meaning all my TSRs now have to load low.

I am using 4DOS 4.01 with DR DOS 6.0 and the EMM386.SYS provided.

I get an error saying something to the effect "Windows was not able to find
a file it needed to start in 386 Enhanced Mode.  Then it prints 
C:\DRDOS\EMM386.SYS and after that, "The performance of Windows will not
be affected."

If I don't have the /WINSTD turned on, it quits.  AARRGHHH!

With /WINSTD in place I have 455k of free memory.  Without I have about 610k.
It used to work for me, where am I going wrong?

-- 
Francis Park, Johns Hopkins Univ '94, Dept/History     killer@jhuvms.hcf.jhu.edu
The Baltimore Chainsaw Massacre BBS:410-467-2617, WWIVLink@14060 v.32bis/v.42bis
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"We must sink the censorship to find out what the truth is..."   -disappear fear
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: reheerdi@nyx.cs.du.edu (Rob Heerdink)
Subject: problems after installing videodriver
Summary: problems after installing videodriver
Keywords: problems, video, various
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 15:47:32 GMT


Hi,
After waiting 3 months Olivetti finally sent me the drivers for my PcPro
33mt so I can now enjoy my 256 colours . fine. good.
But since I installed them, I get these weird problems; general protection
faults in word, general protection faults in cview, and the impossibility
to do anything in a DOSwindow!
What is happening? What should I do?
Please help,
thanks      -Rob

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: ls116@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Lei  Shao)
Subject: 1024x768x256 video driver for Paradise adapter
Reply-To: ls116@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Lei  Shao)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 00:22:21 GMT


Hi there,
   Does anybody know where can I find a 1024x768x256 Windows 3.1 driver for my
Paradise 1MB adapter? Thanx.


Lei Shao
From: Stephen Gibson
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: re: Trident VGA board?
Date: 7 Nov 92 01:33:53 GMT
Organization: Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA


In article <720921452snx@apusapus.demon.co.uk> tfj@apusapus.demon.co.uk (Trevor Jenkins) writes:
>I have an Olympic Technology 386DX machine which is running DOS 5.0 and
>Windows 3.1. When the system boots the VGA BIOS identifies itself as
>Trident's and says ``1024K mode''. When I run MSD (from the \windows
>directory) it identifies the VGA board as a QUADTEL, also using the 386MAX
>equivalent of MSD the claim is that the VGA has 512K of RAM.
>
>Who is telling me the truth?
>
>I RTFMed the VGA manual and it says that the board uses a Trident 8900
>chip however there is NO name on the book so perhaps I've a QUADTEL board
>with a Trident chipset.
>
>I say all this because I've ftp'ed the Trident drivers from
>ftp.cica.indiana.edu over the weekend but I'm reluctant to install them
>until I know one way or the other.
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>Trevor Jenkins                                   Radio: G6AJG
>134 Frankland Rd, Croxley Green, Rickmansworth, WD3 3AU
>email: tfj@apusapus.demon.co.uk
>phone: +44 (0)923 776436 

Go by what your documentation and bootup messages say.  They are more than 
likely to be telling your the truth.  Most diagnostic packages cannot 
correctly identify your VGA BIOS or how much memory you have installed.

Stephen Gibson
Sonoma State University
eMAIL:  gibsonst@sonoma.edu
        Stephen.Gibson@sonoma.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: cs169063@cs.brown.edu (Jason Rosenberg)
Subject: Re: Windows with 2M RAM 
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Brown University
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 21:28:15 GMT


In article <1992Nov9.185519.18959@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> lari@saadi.berkeley.edu (Francesco Lari) writes:

   Hi, 

   I got a friend with a 386-SX/33MHz and 2M of RAM, 80M HD. 
   Is it possible to run Windows with this configuration? 
   I understand it is going to be pretty slow, but she is just going to use 
   simple word processing programs like Word. Do you think she will be 
   able to run it? 

Yeah, this shouldn't be a problem.  I have a 386-SX/16 with a 60M HD
that I ran with 2 meg for a while.  It WILL be slow, even for word
processing, but not unbearably so.  I'll tell ya, though, a couple extra
meg would be a hell of a good idea...

Jason






--
"It must be tough on the astronauts,
 I bet they get bored easily;
 `cause how does it feel
 To look up at the moon
 And say 'Yeah, I've been there' ?"
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: qiang@cubmol.bio.columbia.edu (Qiang Zheng)
Subject: Re: Windows with 2M RAM 
Organization: Columbia University, Dept. of Biological Sciences.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 22:08:34 GMT

I am running Windows 3.1 on one Dell286AT computer with 2 MB RAM.  
It is very slow particularly when running WFW2.0 (Can you believe
this?).  How it does the job.  I have another 386/25MHz DX computer
with 5 MB RAM, running Windows 3.1 and WFW2.0 is much comfortable.

James

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: bgeer@javelin.sim.es.com (Bob Geer)
Subject: Re: Need help w/ Win3.1 upgrade
Reply-To: bgeer@javelin.sim.es.com
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp.
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 16:52:33 GMT

bgeer@javelin.sim.es.com (Bob Geer) writes:
>My Win3.0 installation works fine, but my Win3.1 upgrade randomly
>halts w/ a white-on-blue "system halted parity errors" message
>onscreen.  I have re-loaded my Win3.0 & it runs fine even when
>stressed with something like 3 rows of icons worth of programs
>started, incl. lots of graphics display programs.  I re-upgraded my
>Win3.1 upgrade & get more parity error system halts.  Re-upgrading
>with a friend's Win3.1 disks does the same thing.

>I have low-level formatted my disk, have plenty of disk space, run all
>the diagnostics I have -- DiskManager that came with my Seagate disk.
>(I don't have a copy of CheckIt yet, unfortunately.)

Corrected info:

motherboard: 	DTK 386-20 "FastET20" w/ 1 meg on board
RAM board:	DTK PEI-301 32-bit bus w/ 8 meg 80ns.
disk cont:	DTC 7287 RLL Winchester & floppy cont.
disks:		2 277-r Seagate 62 meg.
video:		ATI VGA Wonder w/ 512k (I have 3.1 drivers)

Please help if you can...it's driving me crazy.  Bob
-- 
<> Bob `Bear' Geer <>  bgeer@beorn.sim.es.com           *    _\|/_  *       <>
<>      alta-holic <>   (this *often* works)     _\|/_    o   /|\    _\|/_  <>
<> Salt Lake City, <>  speaking only for myself,  /|\    <\       *   /|\   <>
<>          Ootah  <>  one of my many tricks          __ /__,               <>
-- 
<> Bob `Bear' Geer <>   bgeer@beorn.sim.es.com     (this *should* work)   <>
<>     cola-zombie <>   speaking only for myself, one of my many tricks   <>
<> Salt Lake City, <>    "We must strive to be more than we are, Lal."    <>
<>          Ootah  <>           -- Cmdr. Data, learning schmaltz          <>
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: vango@halcyon.com (Dennis L. Vogt)
Subject: Re: HP Deskjet 500: Any Good???
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 02:32:04 GMT

mcglob@usissc.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Brian.McGloin) writes:


>I just bought a new Gateway 486sx-25 w/8MB memory, 170 MB HD, and Telepath
>modem, and I'm considering buying a decent, quiet print.  I can't afford a 
>laser printer, so I was considering the HP Deskjet 500.  A CompUSA store
>in nearby Cincinnati had them on sale for $375.

>I use Windows 3.1 a lot and I'm wondering how this printer works under Windows?

I just bought one, so if they are bad, I guess I am a chump.  The
quality is not laser, but it is good - check out a demo if you already
have not.  $375 is a little high though, I just bought mine for $299 at
a local comp store here in Seattle.

Jared
vango@halcyon.com
From: PVossler@cen.ex.ac.uk (P.J.Vossler)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: I did a silly thing...Made a little boo boo..
Date: 13 Nov 92 11:49:51 GMT
	<1992Nov12.192235.14984@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Computer Unit. - University of Exeter. UK


Brilliant ..... If I hadn't been so ill (with a flu virus thing) I might have
thought of running setup from the windows directory myself (amy excuse....).

Thanks to all that have responded...

Cheers.
--
	

===============================================================================
P.J.Vossler, Dept of Physics,	|	Email:p.j.vossler@ex.ac.uk 
University of Exeter		|	Tel  : +44-392-264100
Exeter, Devon, England EX4 4QL  | 	Fax  : +44-392-264111
===============================================================================
-- 
	

===============================================================================
P.J.Vossler, Dept of Physics,	|	Email:p.j.vossler@ex.ac.uk 
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: rms@miles.com (Rob Schultz)
Subject: Re: Windows with 2M RAM 
Organization: Miles Inc., Diagnostics Division, Elkhart, IN
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 14:17:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.094506.5841%yfwu@Uz.nthu.edu.tw> yfwu@Uz.nthu.edu.tw (EE U780935) writes:
>lari@saadi.berkeley.edu (Francesco Lari) writes:
>> I got a friend with a 386-SX/33MHz and 2M of RAM, 80M HD. 
>> Is it possible to run Windows with this configuration? 
>> I understand it is going to be pretty slow, but she is just going to use 
>> simple word processing programs like Word. Do you think she will be 
>> able to run it? 
>*Simple* word processing like WORD ?????  Word is *not* a simple word processing

Well, I would admit that Word for Windows is not nearly the simpleton that 
WordPerfect for Windows is, but in comparison to many Windows programs, Word
is not terribly complex (or large).

>If you run Word in this configuration, the display speed will be very very very
>very very very very slow. (7 verys = 7 seconds per character display speed)
>
>So if you want to run Word, upgrade your memory to 8MB or more, upgrade your
>PC to 486DX33 or 486DX2-33 or more.........

NOT!!!

My fiancee has a 386SL/25 with 2Mb RAM, 80Mb HDD notebook, no coproc, and 
she runs Word for Windows without trouble.  She is an attorney, and
regularly turns out long (10-50 pages) legal documents.  She has never 
complained to me about speed ('cept the printer is too slow :-(), and
I have used the system and have not found any speed problems. She will
be upgrading to 4Mb only because I need to run software that requires the
extra memory.  I expect she will see some speed improvement, but she is
not likely to notice the difference.

*** Flame On ***

I will never understand why some people think that everyone has to have the
latest, fastest, and greatest computer, even when it's not necessary to 
do the job required, nor will it be necessary for the next several years.
My father regularly runs his sales business from an old XT with 640K, a 
30Mb HDD, 1200bps modem, and monochrome monitor.  My mother runs her business
on a 12MHz AT, 1Mb RAM, 40Mb Hdd, 2400bps modem, and EGA monitor.  They will
be upgrading in the near future only because I have finally convinced them 
that their customers will buy more if they have a laptop and can generate
orders at a customer's site.  They are likely to go with a 386SL only 
because that is the most cost-effective solution for their needs.  They
could very well get by with a 286-based notebook, for several years.
But by then, whatever they buy will be obsolete, so why spend the extra
money if they don't have to?
 
*** Flame Off ***
-- 
Rob Schultz   At Home:                        At work:          +1 219 262 7206
                      rms@andria.miles.com                        rms@miles.com
      {uunet|iuvax}!gator!miles!andria!rms        {uunet|iuvax}!gator!miles!rms
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: deb@spectra.eng.hawaii.edu (David Barrett)
Subject: Re: Windows with 2M RAM 
Organization: University of Hawaii, Dept. of Electrical Engineering
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 04:33:09 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.185519.18959@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> lari@robotics.berkeley.edu 	 writes:
>I got a friend with a 386-SX/33MHz and 2M of RAM, 80M HD. 
>Is it possible to run Windows with this configuration? 
>I understand it is going to be pretty slow, but she is just going to use 
>simple word processing programs like Word. Do you think she will be 
>able to run it? 
>
Word doesn't need windows to run.  Word for Windows takes a lot of memory and 
probably will not respond too well with that little ram.  Windows 3.0 barely
takes 1M of RAM and 2M is on the edge.  If there is no extended memory Windows
3.1 will not setup without it and a xm diver.  Just to use a word processor is
not worth the struggle to install unless you up the capacity.  A slow windows
is evenually a real pain.

dB
From: claude@cse.ucsc.edu (Claude Noshpitz)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: HELP: Tseng 4000 SVGA extended modes and DOS box...
Date: 7 Nov 1992 20:03:24 GMT
Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz (CE/CIS Boards)
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: spica.ucsc.edu
Summary: how to set DOSPRMPT.PIF to work right in 132x44 res?

Hi, net!  I just got a spiffy ET4000 SVGA and want to run DOS prompts
using the now-available 132x44 text mode.  I can't seem to get things
tweaked to do this right.  The same problem exists if I start 
Procomm in anything but 24x80.  It seems that I can *start* an app
in extended mode OK, but switching between windowed and fullscreen
breaks up the display.
Any help at all is gratefully appreciated.
Thanks!!!

--cloud


-- 
...................... nothin left to do but :-) :-) :-) ...................
   Claude Noshpitz                 claude@cse.ucsc.edu
     5420 Coast Road                 University of California, AS225
     Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA        Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA   
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: s106275@ee.tut.fi (Anssi Saari)
Subject: Re: Suppressing Ctrl-D when printing postscript
Organization: Tampere University of Technology, Finland
Date:  9 Nov 92 18:28:36 GMT


In <1992Nov9.154323.20059@infodev.cam.ac.uk> mos11@cus.cam.ac.uk (Mark Scase) writes:

>I've seen this question asked before - indeed it is a FAQ *but* I
>have not seen it answered so please don't flame me.

>I'm using Windows 3.1 with the postscript driver 3.53 and I would
>like all print jobs to have the Ctrl-D removed from the top *and*
>the bottom of the print file.

>If you insert ctrld=0 in the printer section of win.ini then the
>Ctrl-D at the top of the file disappears but the one at the bottom
>remains.  Can you get rid of the Ctrl-D at the bottom?  If so, how?

Very simple: setup the printer to print to encapsulated postscript file 
instead.

>I have spoken to Microsoft in the UK and they say that CtrlD=0 gets
>rid of both of them.  I told them that it only got rid of the first
>one but they didn't believe me!

I guess they claim their software is bug-free, too. 

Anssi
Organization: University of Central Florida--Computer Services
Date: Thursday, 5 Nov 1992 03:38:46 EST
From: Tad Simmons <SIMMONS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Paradise 512k driver for 3.1
Distribution: na

In article <1992Nov2.062014.9357@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>,
daniell@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Daniel Lyddy) says:
>
>I'm having trouble with the video driver supplied with my computer (it's a
>Packard-Bell 386XH).  I need a more recent driver so I can use all 256 colors
>with Windows 3.1.  I tried the MS download service, but I found no driver for
>Paradise chips.  Does anyone know of a BBS that supplies 3.1 drivers for the
>Paradise 512k board?  Much obliged.
I don't know about you, but I couldn't do a full 640x480x256 on my machine.
(I'm not sure how much memory my card has, so your milage may vary.)
I had to go find a 640x400x256 driver.  The one I ended up with is PVGA1A31
or something like that...
It's on Wuarchive in the mirrors2/win3/drivers/video directory (I think)...

Also, remember you need to install your video drivers using SETUP in the Win31
directory, you can NOT do it from within Windows (for some reason...).

Hope this helps,
 Tad

Tad Simmons, Computer Operator (I feed printers and clean their cages.)
University of Central Florida in Orlando, Florida (a suburb of Disney World)
SIMMONS@UCF1VM.BITNET    |Owner and general trouble-maker, err... -shooter for
SIMMONS@UCF1VM.CC.UCF.EDU| the SUPERGUY listserv list.  Mail me for more info.
From: beelewm@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: ***> MS.WINDOWS 3.1 ----- HELP !!!!!!!
Date: 10 Nov 92 00:30:07 CST
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

*********************** HELP *************** HELP *******************

Anyone,
	Let me apologise for my spelling up front, it is late and I am
frustrated.  I have a BIG problem and hope someone can help.  

My problem:
	I baught a 486dx/33Mhz from a company called D.C.P. (discount
computer paradise) about 4 months ago.  along with it came M.S.
Windows and dos 5.  About 3 weeks ago I started getting error messages
saying that it was unable to read my "USER.EXE" file or it could not
find my "HIMEM.SYS" file, and would then crash.  A few days later, it
started crashing when I tryed to load it (windows).  I have tryed to
re-install it about 7 times (plus 4 times tonight) and still it will
not load.  the only thing I can tell that is funny is, there is a  
16 Meg swap file called "386spart.par" in my root directory, yes you
read right, 16 Meg's.  I have plenty of memory to run it (633 k
standard w/ 4 Meg's total.  I do not think it is my "autoexec.bat" or
my "config.sys" files, I have tryed every possible combination I or
anyone else in the Computer department could think of.
	To top it all off, today, I tryed to call the technical
support line for D.C.P. and the opperator said that not only was their
tech. support line _disconnected_, but so was their _pruchase line_.

	Any help, advice, sympathy, pity, or donations, would be
greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Catch 22 ------------ Marc Beeler ------------ Beelewm@wkuvx1.bitnet

p.s. ************ HELP !!!!!     >8-(


Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: mechalas@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (John P. Mechalas)
Subject: Re: I did a silly thing...Made a little boo boo..
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Distribution: comp
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 19:22:35 GMT

In article <12NOV199210212736@reg.triumf.ca> damien@reg.triumf.ca (DAMIEN GALLOP) writes:
>In article <BxM03I.EBA@cen.ex.ac.uk>, PVossler@cen.ex.ac.uk (P.J.Vossler) writes...
>> 
>>I tried to setup windows for a different video card, Hee hee, I made a boo 
>>boo. The driver I chose doesn't work and now I can't get windows to work at
>>all.
>>etc.
>
>From DOS, just set default to \WINDOWS, and run SETUP. You can then reselect
>the correct video driver (at least VGA 640x480, if all else fails), and
>then get back on the air.  

Better yet, use your favorite text-editor and just edit the system.ini file.
Change the driver to one that works.

-- 
John Mechalas                                          "I'm not an actor, but
mechalas@gn.ecn.purdue.edu                                 I play one on TV."
Aero Engineering, Purdue University                     #include disclaimer.h
From: banshee@cats.ucsc.edu (Wailer at the Gates of Dawn)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: REQUEST: HP 550C DRIVER for 3.1
Date: 12 Nov 1992 21:11:55 GMT
Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: am.ucsc.edu


	None of the mirror sites have a specific deskjet 550c driver.
Any suggestions other than using the 500 driver?

-- 
The Wailer at the Gates of Dawn              | banshee@cats.UCSC.EDU       |
Just who ARE you calling a FROOFROO Head?    |                             |
DoD#0667  "Just a friend of the beast."      | banshee@ucscb.UCSC.EDU      |
2,3,5,7,13,17,19,31,61,89,107,127,521,607....| banshee@ucscb.BITNET        |
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup,bit.listserv.win3-l
From: vince@megadata.mega.oz.au (Vince Sandrone)
Subject: Epsom LQ2500 driver win31
Keywords: printer,lq2500
Organization: Megadata P/L, North Ryde, Sydney, Aust.
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 05:12:07 GMT

has anybody been able to resolve the bugs with the Lq2500
printer driver
that is, the moving of test from the extreme right to the extreme
left of a page when a margin more less than 1.25 inch(ish) is 
used

We are using windows 3.1 and the printer driver is version 2.2
this may not be the lastest driver (Australian distributors are
notorious for waiting before releasing updates)

failing a bug fix or updated driver- is there any way to 
change the right margin so that all printing is changed to this
default?

thanks

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Megadata Pty Ltd                e-mail: vince@megadata.mega.oz.au
2/37 Waterloo Road,             fax   : +61 2 887-4847 
NORTH RYDE NSW 2113 AUSTRALIA   voice : +61 2 805-0899 
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Megadata Pty Ltd                e-mail: vince@megadata.mega.oz.au
2/37 Waterloo Road,             fax   : +61 2 887-4847 
NORTH RYDE NSW 2113 AUSTRALIA   voice : +61 2 805-0899 
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup,comp.sys.novell