From: hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.org (Bill Hardman)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: PV equation
Date: 17 Nov 92 17:17:12 GMT
Reply-To: hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.org (Bill Hardman)
Organization: Bark At The Moon Productions

ph36@unixg.ubc.ca (Richard Nistuk) writes:

> 
> In article <goD5TB2w165w@throb.mcws.fidonet.org> 
> hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.org (Bill Hardman) writes:
> >gisle@ifi.uio.no (Gisle Hannemyr) writes:
> >> [[ The story so far: ph36@unixg.ubc.ca (Richard Nistuk) has come across
> >>    a really weird equatuion in "Dianetics", and want somebody to explain
> >>    it to him.  The equation is:
> >> 
> >>                    PV=I*D^x
> 
> [deleted: Gisles' summary of what we have learned]
>   
> [deleted: A discussion of the "equation", between myself and Bill
>  	  Hardman, where Bill demonstrates that he hasn't a clue
> 	  what units of measurment are]
> 
> [equation for speed deleted]
> 
> >Please note that you assigned the unit.  You assigned meters, and
> >seconds as the unit measures.  
> 
> 	No, PHYSICS assigned the meters and seconds as the units
> of measure, _standard_ grade 10 algebra assigned the units.
> 
> So what?  Sure, Gisle could have substituted inches for meters
> and picoseconds for seconds, a conversion factor is all that's 
> required.  What's your point Bill?

> >> For those of you out there who did not sleep through your basic
> >> education, sorry about this long-winded explanation of some very basic
> >> principles.
> >> Richard Nistuk's great joke, which Bill Hardman so far has failed to
> 
> [deleted:  Gisle explains the joke]
> 
> >> I'll conclude with Mr. Nistuk's absolute prizeless attempt to compute
> >> the equation.  For those out there who study Scientologist culture,
> >> note that Mr. Hardman's only response is a feeble attempt at a
> >> personal attack and the standard cop-out at the end.
> >> Richard:
> 
> [deleted: my discussion of PV and why I estimated my PV to be $3200.00]
> 
> >> Bill:
> 
> [deleted: Bills' attempt to increase ARC by the "insult method"]
> 
> >> Richard:
> 
> [deleted: my discussion of why I assigned  I=125 I.Q. points
> 	  (a friend tells me that 100 I.Q. points is more about 
> 	  average), and why I assigned D=4,  guess what! the equation
> 	  still doesn't work, but you knew that already didn't you!]
> 
> [deleted: my disscussion of why I assigned x=1]
> 
[deleted: Richard's attempt to work equation]

> >> >> O.K. help me out here, Bill, explain the words!!!
> >> Bill:
> >> > It's not worth my time.
> >> I final question:
> >> Bill, why it is worth your time entering all these discussions, only
> >> to bail out every time you meet some real opposition?  You seem to
> >> have a more imaginative range of excuses (the "out-gradient" was the
> >> best so far) than the cheese salesman in the Monty Phyton "Cheese
> >> Shop" skit!

> >        When did I use the term out-gradient?
> 
> >        As usual, your observations are flawed.  I have never
> >"bailed out" of any discussion.  I have not seen any "real"
> >opposition in this newsgroup.
> 
> 	Where's your response to my post (article 2045; dated: 11 Nov 1992
> 00:27:21 GMT)?  Face up to your "real" opposition baby! 

The post was never received at this site.

> 	You are _not_ current.  You _have_ bailed out.  _Your_ assertion 
> is a bald lie!

If it was received, it was replied to.  That would define current.
Where is the lie Richard?

Bill Hardman

------------------------------- :) -----------------------------------
   hardman = hardman@throb.uucp [modem (818) 352-6297]
                (Bark At The Moon Productions)
                        *A Secret Cult*
If you don't have anything nice to say....Say something Rude!!!!