HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bairstow@haydn.psu.edu (Steven Bairstow)
Subject: Re: Logo in hand-hacked PostScript
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 04:03:11 GMT

In article <1992Aug25.235220.2967@athena.mit.edu> jbm@cyclone.sbi.com (Jeffrey B. Moore) writes:
>bairstow@satie.psu.edu (Steven Bairstow) writes:
>| I just wanted to show everyone what this one did on a NeXT. (Display 
>| Postscript) It ended up logging me off of console. btw. The origional 
>| one works, but is missing page information. 
>
>Gee, those NeXTs are pretty fragile, huh?  Glad we're running Linux!  :-)
>
>-Jeff

It would seem so. This is rather uncharacteristic of them though.

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: cummings@tiger1.prime.com (Kevin J. Cummings)
Subject: Re: QIC 40 / QIC 80 ?
Keywords: streamer, linux, wanted
Organization: Prime Computer, Inc.
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:46:17 GMT

In article <1992Sep3.141525.9011@ncsu.edu>, linville@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (John W. Linville) writes:
> In article <1992Sep3.130230.4422@cbnewsi.cb.att.com> adh@cbnewsi.cb.att.com (andrew.d.hay) writes:
> 
> >i, too, have a dj-10 which i want to use with my system (not
> >linux...).  i called cms about qic docs and they pointed me to ray
> >freeman [&] assoc.  they're the official qic clearinghouse.  i don't
> >have their address/phone handy, but i called them and they sent me the
> >qic-40 and qic-117 specs (and maybe 1 or 2 others) for free.
> 
> The problem is that those specs don't sufficiently document (read: not at all)
> how to program the floppy drive controller chip so that you can send and 
> receive the signals detailed in QIC-117 to the drive itself.  

Hell, CMS can't even get there own software to run under Microsoft Windows
reliably!  (re: version 2.54 of the Jumbo Tape drive software.)  What makes you
think it will work under LINUX?  Since they are re-programming the floppy
controller, I hope that we can access the tape drive and the floppy at the same
time!  (After all, it could be two different users using each!)

> Does anyone know where I can get GOOD documentation of the floppy drive 
> controller?

Er, um, the IBM BIOS?  Oh, you wanted GOOD documentation!  How well is the LINUX
floppy driver commented?  Linus must have coded it from some specification.

Anyone know for sure what CMS does to access the tape drive (instead of the floppy)?
Do they just use the third (or fourth) device select line and drive the floppy
controller directly (bypassing the BIOS)?

=================================================================
Kevin J. Cummings                       PrimeService
20 Briarwood Road                       A Computervision Company
Framingham, Mass.                       500 Old Connecticut Path
					Framingham, Mass.
Work:  cummings@primerd.Prime.COM
Home:  cummings@kjc386.framingham.ma.us

Std. Disclaimer: "Mr. McKittrick, after careful consideration,
		  I've come to the conclusion that your new
		  defense system SUCKS..."   --  War Games
=================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: yan@indetech.com ()
Subject: linux install experience, newbie question, and not so newbie question
Organization: Independence Technologies, Inc. Fremont, CA
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 19:20:57 GMT
From: martin@franck.cs.unc.edu (Kevin Martin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: 8514/A X server public release
Date: 28 Aug 92 02:47:56 GMT

After weeks of development and testing, I'm finally ready to announce
the release of the 8514/A X server for Linux.

The X server is based upon Orest's 1.1 release, and should be
compatible with his upcoming 2.0 release.

The requirements for running this X server are an 8514/A register
compatible video card, Linux 0.96c.pl2 or newer kernel, Orest's 1.1
release, Xlinux8514.T.Z, and GCC 2.2.2d.  Installation instructions
can be found in the README in Xlinux8514.T.Z.

For those of you who want to further optimize the server or port it to
other platforms (e.g., SVR4 or 386BSD), I've provided source code
cdiffs to Orest's xsrc.1.1.T.Z in the x.8514.src.T.Z file.  If you
would like to do further development, please contact me at the e-mail
address below.

Unfortunately my free time has run out, so this will be the only
release of the 8514/A X server unless someone has the time and
experience to pick up where I have to leave off.  I've delayed my
dissertation research during July and August to get this ready, and
while my professor has been patient with me, I cannot push him any
further.  If anyone would like to volunteer, please contact me at the
e-mail address below.

If you have problems setting things up or getting things working,
please send e-mail to the X11 channel on the linux-activists mailing
list or post to c.o.l.  This way everyone can benefit.

I will try to upload these files to sunsite.unc.edu, tsx-11.mit.edu
and nic.funet.fi in the next few days.  The main distribution site for
this package is ftp.cs.unc.edu in the /pub/martin directory.  The
Xlinux8514.T.Z and x.8514.src.T.Z files can be found there today.

Thanks,
Kevin
___
Kevin E. Martin               University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
martin@cs.unc.edu                          Department of Computer Science
From: sundaram@cps.msu.edu (Divya Sundaram)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Writing a Matlab-type Package for Linux and  On-Line FAQ
Date: 2 Sep 92 15:00:40 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Michigan State University, College of Engineering
Originator: sundaram@indian.cps.msu.edu


Hi y'all,

I am interested in finding out if anybody has written or ported a matlab like
program for Linux. I am looking for a program that will help me do engineering
like stuff - not necessarily grahical stuff, but basic stuff like FFTs,
convolution, etc ....

If such a package does not exist, I would be interested in either porting a
public domain version of it, or possibly writing one. Any suggestions on
where I may find such a package or what it should contain were I to write one 
would be really appreciated.

Also, I would like a feature in Linux - the On-line FAQ! This would contain
some uptodate info on installation etc, and could serve as a "man" for 
non unix/computer types (like myself - a DOG 5.0 and Windoze 3.1 user).
It could be downloaded directly from an archive and available online so we 
will not have to print it out every time a new item is added. I do not know 
who keeps the FAQ but this does seem like a good idea since it will remove 
a lot of barriers for the new Linux users.

C-U L8R,

Divya
(sundaram@cps.msu.edu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: bjl@loki.research.ptt.nl (Ben Lippolt)
Subject: Re: File Managers for X
Reply-To: B.J.Lippolt@research.ptt.nl
Organization: PTT Research
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 13:11:36 GMT

khamer@sumax.seattleu.edu (Little Kenny Hamer) writes:

>I am new to the wonders of X and unix, and therefore know little about the
>X servers available in the world.  I have sort of found useful things by
>trial and error, but one item eludes me...

>I would like a File Manager, something that will display the directory
>trees and files on my filesystem.  Does such an item exist for X?  If so,
>what is it called and how do I get it?

There is a tool called 'xdtm' (for X Desktop Manager, I believe). It is
modelled after the MacIntosh desktop. I'm not sure it will run under Linux
(haven't tried to compile it yet), but I've used in on a Sun.
You could give a try. The latest version is 2.5.


Ben Lippolt.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: ujlh@pool.info.sunyit.edu (James Henrickson)
Subject: Re: Up and Running linux
Keywords: Up and Running linux info. needed
Organization: State University of New York -- Institute of Technology
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 17:53:30 GMT

In article <trussell.714780309@cwis> trussell@cwis.unomaha.edu (Tim Russell) writes:
>    Sure.  I've seen posts from people running Linux with 2 M of ram even.

It is not a pretty sight.  I just installed Linux on a second machine, a
386SX-25 with 2 MB of RAM.  I have 880K free after the kernel is loaded,
and bash takes a huge chunk of that.  I can run kermit but not shell out
very often because I usually get a lot of "out of memory" errors.  (Swapping
doesn't seem to eliminate these error messages, maybe my "working set" is
too big to fit in 880K.)  When I *AM* able to run a command from within 
kermit, it is S-L-O-W.

I am getting ready to upgrade to 6 MB of RAM.  :-)  As for minimum
requirements for Linux, I suggest we recommend 3 or 4 MB of RAM.  For
X, I would say 6 MB.  4 MB wasn't enough to do much with, and 8 MB on my
386DX-33 was overkill for most of the stuff I was doing.  I don't
require more than 6 MB very often, but that's what swapping is for.  :-) 

>As far as the 106 M drive, that's certainly enough to run a nice Linux system,
>I'm only using 160 M on my SCSI drives for Linux, and with X, two versions
>of GCC, Linux source, etc etc I still have over 90 M free.  My feeling so far
>is that 80-90 M would be enough disk space for most users unless you're
>running news or something.

I agree, 106 MB is plenty of disk space.  Unless you are going to keep a
lot of source code on your disk.  For binaries, a 64 MB Minix partition
is sufficient for me, and I have a lot of font files and other stuff.
On my SX, I have 8 MB swap and 55 MB Minix partitions and haven't run
into any problems.

>    Depends on what your idea of "the complete Linux" is.  :-)  As I said,
>my system, except for news and TCP/IP, is a "complete linux", and I'm using
>3 M on my root partition and 55 M on my usr partition with a bunch of junk
>sitting around.

Another pack rat?  :-)  I gave gave Linux another 64 MB partition on my
DX because I was too lazy to do some house cleaning.  Some of the stuff
hasn't been touched since April!

>>    4).  What's the major fugures of Linux?  Doesn't it support X on 386sx ? 
>
>    Sure does.  It may be a bit sluggish on 4 M of ram, and you'll definitely
>want a swap partition, but it should work.

How about those Linuxers with 16-32 MB of RAM?  I haven't heard their
experiences.  I wonder if they ever managed to run out of memory, except
when compiling something big like Interviews.  :-)

-- 
Jim H.
*
* James L. Henrickson
* ujlh@sunyit.edu        "Some day I might have a real .signature!"
From: tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: ps for 0.97pl2
Date: 29 Aug 92 18:07:49 GMT
Reply-To: tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
Organization: The Internet


   From: hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com (Kevin W. Hammond)
   Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 06:59:40 GMT

   I FTP'd ps-0.97 from tsx-11 and I cannot get it to compile under 0.97pl2.

   Is there are working version of ps for 0.97pl2 out there some where or have
   I botched the compile job with the version I downloaded??

Just recently appeared on tsx-11: /pub/linux/sources/sbin/ps097p2.

   From: rafal@utstat.uucp (Rafal Kustra (summer student))
   Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 07:47:20 GMT

   On the related note. I've got the same package To try to
   use it for .97pl1. Could not compile it but package
   contains binaries. Ps and top work, but the rest doesn't.
   (free says sumething like _paging_pages not defined).
   Can someone point me to good free for 0.97pl1.

Using the 0.97 ps, modify the function show_memory() in free.c:

Change: paging_pages = get_kword(k_addr("_paging_pages"));

To:     paging_pages = pages;

You'll have to muck with the header files a bit, but you should be able
to get it compile with that one change.

							- Ted
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jwinstea@fenris.claremont.edu (Jim Winstead Jr.)
Subject: Re: Rootimage 97-1
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, WIBSTR
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 03:09:56 GMT

In article <714872665.F00266@remote.halcyon.com> Mike.Bloxham@f22.n121.z1.fidonet.org (Mike Bloxham) writes:
>Hi All-
>    I am just starting to look at installing Linux.  I have had some
>experience with Minix in the past, but Linux looks great!  I just got
>the bootimage and rootimage files from txs-11 and noticed that the
>rootimage file is larger than a 1.2mb 5.25" floppy.  Rawrite errors
>after it finishes track 79.  Is this a problem?  I could actually load
>the diskette though!  Not sure if it is complete.  

rootimage-0.97.1 is *exactly* 1200KB, and it fits on a HD 5.25" disk
perfectly, in my experience.

I don't know why rawrite is giving any errors, unless there are
problems with the disk you wrote the image too.  Anyone else have any
ideas or similar problems?
-- 
                                    +      Jim Winstead Jr. (CSci '95)
                                    |      Harvey Mudd College, WIBSTR
                                    |   jwinstea@jarthur.Claremont.EDU
                                    + or jwinstea@fenris.Claremont.EDU
Organization: Sophomore, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 17:11:15 -0400 
From: Court Demas <cd2a+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Which EtherNet to buy?

I'm looking to buy an ethernet card, and I was wondering if anybody has
a suggestion as to a particular one to get.  I just don't want to buy
something that is not going to work under Linux.  Have any ethernet
drivers been written yet?  

A card here at the computer star is 'SMC' or something and is pretty
cheep (around $200)..


thanks!
-court
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jem@vipunen.hut.fi (Johan Myreen)
Subject: Re: Motif in SLS
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Date: 23 Aug 92 22:04:06

In article <1992Aug21.011014.3070@sol.UVic.CA> pmacdona@sanjuan (Peter MacDonald) writes:

>Contrary to what someone said, Motif is NOT included in the SLS
>distribution.  Instead it includes the GWM (generic window manager)
>which has a Motif emulation mode.  So no patent infringement is 
>involved.

What about copyright? Or look and feel? (:-)

My reaction to the mwm emulator (after the initial aah and ooh) was:
Why did somebody bother to make an *exact* copy of the Motif window
manager? I mean, it looks pretty, but couldn't anybody have come up
with something more original? I can understand copying the API and
functionality of an operating system (for compatibility). But there
are no compatibility issues with window managers, at least none
concerning their appearance.

I guess the Motif emulator was easy to do, since all the design work
had already been done by the OSF...

(It might sound like I'm very worried about the legal status of the
emulator. Well, I'm not. (What, me worry?) I'm just astonished that
somebody would go through so much trouble to create something that
looks like mwm, but still isn't the real thing.)

--
Johan Myreen
jem@cs.hut.fi
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,alt.cd-rom
From: russell@csd475a.erim.org (John Russell)
Subject: Re: What is a good PC CD-ROM drive for me?
In-reply-to: ericy@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu's message of 23 Aug 92 23:46:35 GMT
Organization: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
	<1992Aug23.234635.19534@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: 25 Aug 92 15:01:34


 
   >>What do you recommend?  I would prefer a low-end cheap drive, since
   >>speed is not important.

	>   Keep in mind that the real cheap drives can have seek times on the
        >order of 800ms.  If this is acceptable to you, then go ahead.
   
   I have seen software advertised that speeds these slow access units up.
   Has anyone tried this software? Do you get a noticeable performance 
   increase?  I don't remember the name/manufacturer of the software.
   The price was quite reasonable.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ |    John H. Russell
 Internet: Russell@vaxa.erim.org   |        ERIM
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ |    Ann Arbor, Michigan
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 ERIM does not necessarily share the same opinions as this message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: liljeber@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Mika Pekka Liljeberg)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: QIC 40 / QIC 80 ?
Date: 4 Sep 92 15:58:49 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Finland

In article <1992Sep3.174918.9822@uoft02.utoledo.edu> billp@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu (Bill Parquet) wrote:
> I've seen a lot of discussion about this.  The people who were working on
> that for 386bsd complained that the timing requirements were extremely tight
> for running qic 40/80... At least too tight for a multitasking environment.

So these people have actually managed to get some specific info on how to
access the tape drive! Was the driver a general one, or for a drive from
a particular vendor? Do you remember the names of these people?

The subject of QIC 40/80 tape drives crops up every now and then. So far
nothing has come of it, because no-one seems to know how to program these
beasts. I've been under the impression that the information is proprietary.
Please prove me wrong! :-)

> If it were really necessary, I'd much rather have a tape backup program that
> ran in some sort of exclusive mode than nothing at all.

Agreed. The main objective is to be able to _use_ a tape drive. If the rest of
the system is down for the duration, so be it.

	Mika
--
Mika Liljeberg			Email:	liljeber@kruuna.Helsinki.FI
Helsinki University			Mika.Liljeberg@Helsinki.FI
Dept. of Computer Science
From: jong@boole.seas.ucla.edu (Jong Y. Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: question on shoelace
Date: 2 Sep 92 10:09:20 GMT
Organization: SEASnet, University of California, Los Angeles


Hi netters!

I was trying to install shoelace for my linux which is locaed in 2nd partition
of 2nd physical disk drive.  But when I ran laceup -w /dev/hda, it seems that
it only lets only 4 partitions from 1st physical hard disk boot directly.
The partitions from 2nd hard disk doesn't even show up at the menu at all.
Is there any way to get around this?  Or am I stuck with floppy disks each
time I boot?
Thanks in advance.

Jongyoon

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Lars Wirzenius)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Swap files versus swap partitions
Date: 4 Sep 92 19:42:15 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki

wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Lars Wirzenius) writes:
>	echo swapfile | tar /bin/tar -c -f /dev/fd0 +exclude-from - -C / 

You idiot, fool, imbecile looser.  You need to be shot.  Make that:

	echo swapfile | tar -c -f /dev/fd0 +exclude-from - /

and it may even work.

--
Lars.Wirzenius@helsinki.fi	"This time I even tried something similar"
From: callison@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (James P. Callison)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: EISA bus machines
Date: 26 Aug 92 18:51:17 GMT
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

In article <1992Aug23.121312.28857@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> cmenser@nyx.cs.du.edu (Charles Menser) writes:
>In article <1992Aug23.054741.316@athena.mit.edu> tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o) writes:
>>
>>   From: cc_s525@kingston.ac.uk (Francis Bell)
>>   Date: 22 Aug 92 14:10:56 GMT
>>
>>	  The FAQ says that Linux won't run on EISA machines. Can anyone
>>   explain why, and suggest how difficult it would be to remedy ?
>>
>>That's not strictly true; if your EISA machine has a ISA floppy
>>controller and a ISA graphics card plugged into, then Linux should be
>>able to run on it without any problems.  In fact, I think I remember
>>someone reporting success with this configuration.
>
>Is an ISA floppy controller needed? If so, does the 1740 (Adaptec) sport
>a floppy interface (As I read the SCSI FAQ the 1740 is supported)?

If you buy an EISA machine that doesn't have on-board IDE and floppy
controllers, all I can say is, hoo boy, did they see you coming! When
you're buying EISA, you're shelling out big bucks (our EISA file server
cost ~$7000 (but it had niceties like an STB PowerGraph Ergo 1024, dual
Rimfire EISA SCSI controllers, dual Intel EtherExpress 32 NICs, etc... :-)
If it's on-board, EISA or not doesn't matter; I've run linux off my server
with absolutely _no_ problems. (Well, it refused to recognize the Rimfires,
but that'll change once we get 32-bit SCSI support... :-) Just enable the
on-board IDE, and awaaaaay we go!

					James

James P. Callison       Microcomputer Coordinator        OU Law Library 
Callison@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu   /\    Callison@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu
	constellation!biglaw!callison@mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu
DISCLAIMER: I'm not an engineer, but I play one at work...
Don't. You might lose a finger, and you wouldn't be able to count to 10.
			--Jaime Escolante, "Stand and Deliver"
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
Subject: Re: clearing SUID bit on writes
Reply-To: tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
Organization: The Internet
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 17:02:21 GMT

   From: vesseur@fwi.uva.nl (Joep JJ Vesseur)
   Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 09:11:47 GMT

   when appending to a file with S_ISUID bit set, linux keeps the
   'bit up', while i think it's desirable that whenever anyone appends 
   to such a file, the bit gets cleared. the same holds for S_ISGID
   bits.  i don't know whether the behaviour of setuid files is defined
   somewhere (at least i can't find it in 'the design and implementation
   of the 4.3bsd unix operating system', i don't have docs on sysV); 
   all i know is that SunOs clears the bit.

When System V does is whenever you write to a setuid file (not just when
you append to it), it clears the setuid and setgid bits.  This prevents
a security hole if you have a setuid program which is group or world
writeable.  I don't think anything would break if we added this behavior
to Linux.  On the other hand, there's a much simpler way of avoiding the
security hole, which is to simply don't create group or world writeable
setuid files.

							- Ted
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: f6930910@scheme.cs.ubc.ca
Subject: uugetty
Reply-To: f6930910@scheme.cs.ubc.ca
Organization: The Internet
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 07:00:49 GMT

I have taylor-uucp but didn't catch uugetty.  I think I saw it
mentioned (but didn't pay much attention :-( ).  Could
someone point me to it?  Thanx

- Ken
From: moyerg@rigel.cs.pdx.edu (gary a moyer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: build.c chokes and dies....
Date: 28 Aug 92 04:01:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: pdxgate.6037

Got the swapping matter worked out and am now trying to build the
kernel.  Everything goes okay until the last file: build.
I got a bunch of errors concerning header files (signal.h, stdlib.h, etc..)
Is there a quick fix or do I need a patch or ...?

Am using gcc2.2.2d


Thanks.

==
  Gary Moyer
  moyerg@rigel.cs.pdx.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: linville@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (John W. Linville)
Subject: Re: QIC 40 / QIC 80 ?
Keywords: streamer, linux, wanted
Organization: Computer and Technologies Theme Program, NCSU, Raleigh
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 14:15:25 GMT

In article <1992Sep3.130230.4422@cbnewsi.cb.att.com> adh@cbnewsi.cb.att.com (andrew.d.hay) writes:

>i, too, have a dj-10 which i want to use with my system (not
>linux...).  i called cms about qic docs and they pointed me to ray
>freeman [&] assoc.  they're the official qic clearinghouse.  i don't
>have their address/phone handy, but i called them and they sent me the
>qic-40 and qic-117 specs (and maybe 1 or 2 others) for free.

The problem is that those specs don't sufficiently document (read: not at all)
how to program the floppy drive controller chip so that you can send and 
receive the signals detailed in QIC-117 to the drive itself.  

Does anyone know where I can get GOOD documentation of the floppy drive 
controller?

AdvThanksance

John W. Linville



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  John W. Linville                Amateur radio:  KD4KHC                  |
|  #include "std_disclaimer.h"     E-mail:  linville@catt.ncsu.edu         |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: bennetjd@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU
Subject: Local Bus Machines
Reply-To: bennetjd@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 03:28:26 GMT

Would Linux and X run on a machine with Local Bus SVGA and a Local Bus
IDE drive?

Jonathan Bennett
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux