HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hollaar%basset.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Lee Hollaar)
Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi
Subject: Re: Are you sure UNIX is a trade mark?
Summary: Trademarks are NOT case sensitive
Keywords: trademarks
Date: 7 Sep 92 19:16:52 GMT
Expires: October 1, 1992
Followup-To: alt.suit.att-bsdi
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept

In article <1859@adagio.UUCP> grog@adagio.UUCP (Greg Lehey) writes:
> ... Leave
>the name UNIX AT&T, USL or whatever they call themselves this week,
>and refer to the operating system family as Unix. Trademarks are
>case-sensitive.

From the section on filing requirements in "Basic Facts About Trademarks" from
the United States Patent and Trademark Office:
  "If the drawing [showing the mark to be registered] is in typewritten
  form, the mark _must_ be typed entirely in CAPITAL LETTERS.  [Emphasis
  in the original.]  Capital letters must be used even if the mark, as
  used, includes lower-case letters."

More importantly, it is likely that confusion would result between the uses
of UNIX and Unix, so the different capitalization would meet one of the
fundamental tests for trademark infringement.
Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Are you sure UNIX is a trade mark?
Organization: Taronga Park BBS
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 23:49:25 GMT

In article <1859@adagio.UUCP> grog@adagio.UUCP (Greg Lehey) writes:
>Well, yes. However, I see a much simpler answer to the problem. Leave
>the name UNIX AT&T, USL or whatever they call themselves this week,
>and refer to the operating system family as Unix. Trademarks are
>case-sensitive.

Yes, but AT&T has apparently trademarked "Unix" as well. That's why I've
started using "uNIX".
-- 
                                                                `-_-'
                         Have you hugged your wolf today?        'U`

Peter da Silva, Taronga Park BBS, Houston, TX  +1 713 568 0480/1032
Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi
From: bzs@ussr.std.com (Barry Shein)
Subject: Re: 32/V licensing
Organization: The World
	<1992Aug20.235637.21040@njitgw.njit.edu>
	<KANDALL.92Aug21141122@globalize.nsg.sgi.com>
	<BZS.92Aug21192010@ussr.std.com>
	<KANDALL.92Aug24143319@globalize.nsg.sgi.com> <Aug.25.21
	<KANDALL.92Sep4175019@globalize.nsg.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 23:54:52 GMT


From: kandall@nsg.sgi.com (Michael Kandall)
>>I do not think the contract is invalidated in any way by AT&T's
>>deregulation.
>
>Barry> That is a nice opinion. What do you base it on?
>
>Commercial versions of the license aside, the educational license
>distributed today is not very different in text or spirit than the one
>signed by UCB nearly 15 years ago.  The events of deregulation, the
>computer biz, creation of USO, creation of USL, sale of USL etc. have
>made no major change in UNIX educational licensing practices.  Same
>qualifications, same restrictions, etc., minor wording and name
>changes.

So far that just says they're the same and no one has challenged it.

Besides, the same contract under different conditions is a different
contract. If you don't believe that then I'll sell you something and
then damage it before delivery and see if you still feel beholden.

>If the T+C's of the educational licenses being signed today were
>substantially *different* than the ones 15 years ago, I would find
>your point more cogent.  That would be evidence to me that the old
>conditions are now possibly invalid, and fail to have meaning in the
>current context.  However, since basically the same license is still
>being used today, my personal logic questions why UCB's would be
>invalid.

You should work on your personal logic, it has no relationship to the
law.

>Why did you think UCB's contract was invalid?

Because UCB (et al) agreed to certain limitations on code development
and distribution in a climate where the other signee (AT&T) was also
so limited.

As yet another analogy: If you agreed to give 1% of your company's net
profits to a charitable not-for-profit for the next X years, and
during that time they changed their mission and went for-profit, would
you feel the original contract might be invalid?

That's pretty close. AT&T, at the time the contract was originally
agreed to, was forbidden by law from engaging in commercial sale of
the software. I would consider a change in that a change in the
original assumption of the contract.

--
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@world.std.com          | uunet!world!bzs
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202        | Login: 617-739-WRLD
Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi
From: kandall@nsg.sgi.com (Michael Kandall)
Subject: Re: 32/V licensing
Organization: Nihon Silicon Graphics, Japan
	<1992Aug20.235637.21040@njitgw.njit.edu>
	<KANDALL.92Aug21141122@globalize.nsg.sgi.com>
	<BZS.92Aug21192010@ussr.std.com>
	<KANDALL.92Aug24143319@globalize.nsg.sgi.com> <Aug.25.21
	<KANDALL.92Sep4175019@globalize.nsg.sgi.com>
	<BZS.92Sep4185452@ussr.std.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 21:35:43 GMT

>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 1992 23:54:52 GMT, bzs@ussr.std.com (Barry Shein) said:

Barry> As yet another analogy: If you agreed to give 1% of your company's net
Barry> profits to a charitable not-for-profit for the next X years, and
Barry> during that time they changed their mission and went for-profit, would
Barry> you feel the original contract might be invalid?

Yes, it is conceivable to me.  If contract law takes into account the
intentions and implied understanding on both sides, it could be.  If
both sides understood this 1% hinged on non-profit status, and if
contract law recognized this implied intent, then it could be.

I am not contesting that a contract may be rendered invalid.

Barry> That's pretty close. AT&T, at the time the contract was originally
Barry> agreed to, was forbidden by law from engaging in commercial sale of
Barry> the software. I would consider a change in that a change in the
Barry> original assumption of the contract.

But why is sale of the software, or previous restrictions on selling
the software, relevant?  The *main claim* against UCB has to do with
*unrestricted distribution*, *not sale*, of the software.  All
UCB wants to do is

	1) to support their claim that NET/2 is not derivative
		of UNIX
	2) distribute NET/2 freely

Selling software is not at the core of the claim, and is extrememly
tangential to the case.  Selling software only comes into play against
_BSDI_ who has "improperly" (t.b.d.) obtained UNIX and started selling
it without "proper" license.  And this is strictly a result of UCB's
distribution practices.  (Then, there is the conspiracy/collusion
part of the claim that BSDI == UCB.)

AT&T's acquired ability to sell UNIX for-profit has nothing to do with
the question of UCB's ability to distribute NET/2.  If UCB were
contesting the right to *sell* NET/2, all your analogies would make
sense to me.   


Mike
----
















Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi
From: bzs@ussr.std.com (Barry Shein)
Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi
Subject: Re: 32/V licensing
Date: 7 Sep 92 20:48:11 GMT
	<KANDALL.92Sep7163543@globalize.nsg.sgi.com>
	<1992Sep7.102051.13494@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
Organization: The World


From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
>This is because there does not seem to be a clear
>assignation of ownership of derivitive works to AT&T, and AT&T was
>prohibited at the time (81?) from the software-for-profit business.  This
>was an implied protection for UCB, and is probably binding for the contract
>at the time (I suppose one could speculate that the inclusion by AT&T of
>BSD derived code in SVR4 violates the spirit of Judge Greenes ruling to
>this effect, and perhaps SVR4 is illegal, since their calim to ownership
>in the BSD code relies on a premise of "illegal investment" in the software
>industry.

Bingo.

It is quite possible that UCB has a claim on SVR4 as a derivitive work
of BSD. The reasoning is a bit subtle, but once worked through it
seems glaring. Add in the point you make about illegal investment in
the software industry by AT&T and...

        Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,
          Humpty Dumpty had a great fall,
        All the King's lawyers,
          And all the King's men,
        Couldn't put Humpty together again.

This could get interesting.

--
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@world.std.com          | uunet!world!bzs
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202        | Login: 617-739-WRLD
From: bzs@ussr.std.com (Barry Shein)
Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi
Subject: Re: 32/V licensing
Date: 5 Sep 92 00:02:05 GMT
	<17170@ulysses.att.com> <BZS.92Sep2192004@ussr.std.com>
	<1992Sep4.024323.24735@wyvern.twuug.com>
Organization: The World


From: asoper@wyvern.twuug.com (Aubrey Soper)
>>I would call such a situation a change in circumstances that affects
>>the original assumptions of the contract.
>
>Sorry, but assumptions have nothing do to with contract law.

No, I'm sorry, what do you base this ``proof by assertion'' on?

>Also, I think your example of bankruptcy is a little off the mark
>since, arguendo, BSDI might avail itself of bankruptcy protection 
>but this would not provide any collateral protection against the
>charges asserted by AT&T/USL.

That wasn't the point of that analogy at all.

The point was merely a general one about how a change in the
reasonable assumptions of parties (e.g. the other party going
bankrupt) can change the standing of a contract even if not explicitly
stated.

And there are a thousand other such situations.

--
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@world.std.com          | uunet!world!bzs
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202        | Login: 617-739-WRLD
Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi
From: jsaker@cwis.unomaha.edu (James R. Saker Jr.)
Subject: Looking for USL v BSDI, UCB Regents case info
Keywords: bsdi,usl,ucberkeley,court,info
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 01:04:56 GMT

Does anyone know what district court the lawsuit against BSDI and
UC Berkeley Board of Regents was filed in?


.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
.  Jamie Saker					jsaker@cwis.unomaha.edu    .
.  Network Costing Analyst			Business/MIS Major	   .
.  Telenational Communications			Univ. Nebraska at Omaha	   .
.  (402) 392-7548							   .
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
From: Myself
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: anonymous
Date: 5 Sep 92 15:21:20 GMT
Organization: University of Myself

test
test
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: ccengsl@@solomon.technet.sg (Ng Seow Lin)
Subject: hello
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 03:22:49 GMT


hello this is a test


Newsgroups: alt.test
From: grf@theta.ma.adfa.oz.au (Glenn Fulford)
Subject: test
Organization: Maths Dept. ADFA
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 00:09:52 GMT

testing.
-- 

 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
 | Glenn R. Fulford.                                               |
 |                               Office:           +61 6 268 8887  |
 | Mathematics Department,       Messages:         +61 6 268 6868  |
 | University College, ADFA,     FAX:              +61 6 268 8886  |
 | Canberra, A.C.T. 2601.        Home:             +61 6 241 8113  |
 | AUSTRALIA.                    e-mail: grf@maadfa.ma.adfa.oz.au  |
 |                                       grf@ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au  |
 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
From: root@cicero.IN-Berlin.DE (Martin Mueller)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: TEST10
Date: 15 Sep 92 22:21:36 GMT
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

TESTARTIKEL

-- 


mfG
||\\    //|| ||\\    //||    Flame to: mm@cicero.IN-Berlin.DE    |
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: Re: they told me ...
From: krenek@elec.canterbury.ac.nz (Steve Krenek)
Date: 13 Sep 92 22:05:13 +1200
Organization: /home/users/staff/krenek/News/header.organisation
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

thiis is steve's follow up test
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: smccann@dante.nmsu.edu (Stan McCann)
Subject: test
Organization: New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 01:41:13 GMT


A
:

this is a test
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: bjones@cambria.columbus.oh.us (Bill Jones)
Subject: test
Organization: Cambria Mail and News Gateway -- Columbus., OH
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 22:36:14 GMT
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

This is a test of a new installation of Cnews and tin.

Bill


--
===============================================================================
Bill Jones
bjones@cambria.columbus.oh.us
===============================================================================
Xref: sparky alt.test:11993 misc.test:10801
Newsgroups: alt.test,misc.test
Subject: test
From: clark@kiwi.gen.nz (Clark Mills)
Date: 15 Sep 92 06:01:14 GMT
Reply-To: clark@kiwi.gen.nz (Clark Mills)
Followup-To: all@kiwi.gen.nz
Organization: Household UNIX, Auckland, New Zealand

Posted from New Zealand on 15 September 1992 6:00 pm (local time)
Followup_to: set to all@kiwi.gen.nz
-- 
Domain: clark@kiwi.gen.nz  -----------------------------+-------------------+
Voice : 64-25-935002        Disclaimer: All errors are  | $ nice -20 work & |
Fax   : 64-9-8494282                    line niose!     | $ exec games      |
Snail : PO Box 47-195, Ponsonby, Auckland, New Zealand  +-------------------+
Newsgroups: alt.test,misc.test
From: santan@phi.cs.fsu.edu (Sheryl Santangini)
Subject: Re: testing
Reply-To: santan@nu.cs.fsu.edu
Organization: Florida State University Computer Science Department
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 02:49:58 GMT

In article <HOGAN.92Aug26154651@cujo.csl.sri.com> hogan@csl.sri.com (Emmett Hogan) writes:
>
>It's a test, what else would you expect?
>

This is a test too.


-- 
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
       Sheryl Santangini          |   "Nothing in life is to be feared, it is
    Florida State University	  |     only to be understood.  Now is the
Computer Science Graduate Student |     time to understand more, so that we
        (904) 644-0963		  |     may fear less."
  email:  santan@cs.fsu.edu	  |			     Marie Curie
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: scip2012@nusunix3.nus.sg (WU JIANHUA)
Subject: test scip2012
Organization: National University of Singapore
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 08:08:44 GMT

sdlfj;s
From: nobody@nonono.nonono.nil (Dr. Nobody Nofamily)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: test anonymous
Date: 14 Sep 92 03:47:11 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota

I can't believe it's not mine.
I can't believe it's not yours.
I can't believe it's not my friends'.
I can't believe it's not my dog's.
I can't believe it's Yogurt&Butter.
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 OHAHAHAHAOAHAOHAOHOSDFHOSAHFOSHOFHLSDFLHAOHAOHOAHOAHOAHOHOAHOAHOAHOAHOHAOHOA
 OAHOAHOHOAHOAHOAHOHAOHAOHOAHOHAOHAOAOHOFAHDSOHAOHOAHOFHOAOHAOHOAHOAHOHOAHOAH
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: cole@inst-sun1.tmc.edu (Steve Cole)
Subject: Re: test
Keywords: d
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 21:22:31 GMT

In article <Sep.1.12.58.47.1992.28466@math.rutgers.edu> desper@math.rutgers.edu (Rick Desper) writes:
>
>test


Newsgroups: alt.test
From: ibarrac@kzin.fiu.edu (Carlos A. Ibarra)
Subject: test
Organization: Florida International University, Miami
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 20:46:48 GMT

Test post
From: pinto+@pitt.edu (David J Pinto)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: test
Date: 5 Sep 92 05:50:38 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

test
From: mbir@channel.neusc.bcm.tmc.edu (MBIR software)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: ******TEST******
Date: 4 Sep 1992 21:42:28 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston,Tx

Test test and more test!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: sathi@cco.caltech.edu (Narayana Sateesh Pillai)
Subject: Re: testing againn!!
Keywords: again!
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: US
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 04:10:36 GMT

sathi@cco.caltech.edu (Narayana Sateesh Pillai) writes:

>how long will it take for an article to arrive on the net?
It is time to post a follow up to this article.
To answer your question: I don't know how long it will take!

The clock is all messed up!!!

-- 

This is supposed to be my very own John Hancock!!
Will it work?
From: leuthold@atmo1.atmo.arizona.edu
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: the usual
Date: 14 Sep 92 17:44:36 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Atmospheric Sciences

xxxxxxxxxx
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: Seattle@uw.washoington.wsduedu
Subject: test anonymously
Organization: University of Bizzare
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 17:20:42 GMT

Test anonymously

Newsgroups: alt.test
From: jecoleb@eos.ncsu.edu (another test hoser)
Subject: test test test
Keywords: test
Reply-To: jecoleb@eos.ncsu.edu
Organization: The Ghost Of Christmas Past Society
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 20:51:41 GMT



Test.


--
----------jeff the wonder llama, jecoleb@eos.ncsu.edu

------"I am a penis. Worship me."--lead singer of rock band Bicycle Face,
     vainly attempting to gain attention of the crowd at the Cat's Cradle 
     in Chapel Hill, while opening for Mojo Nixon & The Toad Liquors
--
It's not my fault, it wasn't up to you
Christmas Eve comes once a year and that will never do
Your image started fading, I closed my eyes to see
Tell me, do you close your eyes for me?
From: Benjamin.Fan@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Benjamin Fan)
Newsgroups: alt.test,cornell.test
Subject: testing
Date: 11 Sep 92 23:51:16 GMT
Followup-To: alt.test
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service

Okay,

Theoretically, this article will "piggyback" on the
alt.test newsgroup, all the way to Cornell U., where
it will get placed on cornell.test, too.  So, I will
be able to post to cornell.test, a group which
North Carolina doesn't get.

Ben
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
From: mosdal@wisplan.uwex.wisc.edu (F. Robert Mosdal)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: This is a test, of course ###
Keywords: test
Date: 9 Sep 92 19:42:11 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: NWPEP

This is a test of  course
From: kavaklis@csi.forth.GR (Yannis Kavaklis)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: test
Date: 9 Sep 92 20:15:07 GMT
Distribution: alt
Organization: ICS - FORTH, P.O.Box 1385, Heraklio, Crete, Greece 711 10

just a test!!

Newsgroups: alt.test
From: root@afp.com (root AFP)
Subject: test
Organization: Agence France Presse 13 place de la Bourse, BP 20, 75061 Paris
	Cedex 02, France
Distribution: alt
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 23:35:48 GMT

Yet another test.
From: cca13@keele (G.D. Pratt)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: this is a test of Pnews
Date: 14 Sep 92 10:04:24 GMT
Organization: Keele University, England

Not!
--
gerry pratt  --  workstation support  --  university of keele
email:  gerry@seq1.keele.ac.uk  --------  tel:  (0782) 583072
"I want to be a non-conformist - just like everyone else."
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: sl@@solomon.technet.sg (Seow Lin)
Subject: test
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 03:23:12 GMT


this is a tes
From: pinto+@pitt.edu (David J Pinto)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: test test
Date: 5 Sep 92 17:25:03 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

Heyho everybody.  
dsfgsdfgd
dfgdsfgdfg
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: news@netcon.smc.edu (UseNet Administrator)
Subject: test 3 from SMC
Organization: Santa Monica College, Santa Monica, CA
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 23:44:02 GMT

This is hopefully the last test
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: Re: ZZSecond Test
From: coedgar@wisipc.weizmann.ac.il (Edgar Ron)
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 20:30:37 GMT
Distribution: BC
Organization: Weizmann Institute of Science, Computation Center.

leffler@physics.ubc.ca (Steve Leffler) writes:
: This is a second test of the message system
: Test
: Test
: Test
: This should be only local (but maybe not).
: local ha ? hmmm.....
TEST TEAASDFASDFASDF ASDFASDFASDF
:
--
| Ron Edgar                   coedgar@wispy1.weizmann.ac.il
| The Weizmann Ins. Sci.     "Old chemists never die,
| Rehovot Israel              they just reach equilibrium"

Newsgroups: alt.test
From: colin@hub.co.uk (Colin Renshaw, System Management, 2241)
Subject: testing
Reply-To: colin@hub.co.uk
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 15:25:50 GMT

Hello

---
Q: How many user support people does it take to change a light bulb?
A: We have an exact copy of the light bulb here and it seems to be
   working fine.  Can you tell me what kind of system you have?
From: benton@dept.physics.upenn.edu (Don Benton)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: Re: Still just testing
Date: 8 Sep 92 20:49:57 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania Physics Department

Testing #2
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: jerry@mozart (Gerald Siek)
Subject: Test from uni-paderborn.de, Newsreader 'tin'
Keywords: atest
Organization: Uni-GH Paderborn
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 07:04:35 GMT

Guess what.
Newsgroups: alt.test,misc.test,ga.test,git.test
From: bporter@nyx.cs.du.edu (Brad Porter)
Subject: test
Followup-To: bporter@nyx.cs.du.edu
Summary: test
Keywords: test
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 12:46:11 GMT


--
->  Bradley D. Porter      Georgia Institute of Technology     Sophomore-ChE  <-
->Internet: gt8006b@prism.gatech.edu        US Mail: Georgia Tech Box 38006   <-
->          bporter@nyx.cs.du.edu                    Atlanta, GA    30332     <-
->"Announcer: ...towels may be harmful if swallowed in large quantities"-HHGTG<-
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: smw@unity.ncsu.edu (Shawkang Wu)
Subject:  test
Organization: /usr/local/lib/rn/organization
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 13:53:59 GMT

test.
-- 

--Shawkang Wu
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: sathi@cco.caltech.edu (Narayana Sateesh Pillai)
Subject: testing
Summary: this
Keywords: testing
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: US
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 03:44:01 GMT

This is just a test!!!!!
Don't get any ideas!
From: crawls@dorsai.com (Charles Rawls)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: testing testing
Date: 9 Sep 92 06:08:53 GMT
Organization: The Dorsai Embassy +1.718.729.5018
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4


asdf
asdf
asdf
test 10
From: jcpearso@ps.ucl.ac.uk (James Pearson)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: Test
Date: 9 Sep 92 13:43:12 GMT
Distribution: alt
Organization: Photogrammetry and Surveying, UCL

Test
From: kostenba@lafcol.lafayette.edu (Phil Kostenbader)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: t
Keywords: t
Date: 15 Sep 92 01:38:48 GMT


-- 
-phil
Newsgroups: alt.test
From: mha02@@solomon.technet.sg (TEMP MHA 2)
Subject: Joyce is testing
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 03:25:36 GMT


Gee this is exciting. Imagine talking to the whole world. I can't believe it.
Excuse the mindless ranting but this is my first time
From: ba030@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Gilles Carmel)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: blah blah blah\
Date: 6 Sep 1992 18:07:57 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


This is only a test


Oi
From: il@bobcat.ent.ohiou.edu
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: QQ
Date: 14 Sep 92 03:19:59 GMT
Organization: Te Athens
Originator: senthil@bobcat.ent.ohiou.edu

THer lksdjflksdfjsdilk
From: Me
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: where am I come from?
Date: 5 Sep 92 14:35:32 GMT
Organization: university of Myself

Test
Test
Test
From: hm342st@unidui.uni-duisburg.de (Michael Staats)
Newsgroups: alt.test
Subject: guess
Date: 15 Sep 1992 17:43:43 +0200
Organization: Universitaet Duisburg GH
NNTP-Posting-Host: unidui.uni-duisburg.de
Summary: test
Keywords: test

test!

-- 
Michael Staats, Student of Theoretical Physics, Uni-GH Duisburg 
Wenn dieser Artikel in Deutsch ist: Bitte entschuldigt meine Fehler.
If this article is in english: Please excuse me for my mistakes. 
if (written_in_C(&article)) mistake_msg_to("michael@hal6000.uni-duisburg.de");
Newsgroups: alt.test