HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jerk@atlanta.blowout.forty-one-fourteen (Elvis Presly)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Open Letter to Marv Levy
Date: 23 Nov 92 23:48:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


	Thank you for showing an extreme amoutn of mercy and not running up the
score to an all-time high that would never have been broken.  I'm sorry I didn't
have the class to return the favor, what with that onside kick at the end of the
game and all, but I'm just a moron who can't help himself.
	My wife thanks you for allowing me to claim I should still keep my
job.
							Unsincerely,
								Jerry Glanville
From: v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Damned for all time...)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: SUPER BOWL TALK: BILLS AND 49ERS
Date: 20 Nov 92 04:45:00 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <92323.002633RAP115@psuvm.psu.edu>, RAP115@psuvm.psu.edu writes...
>The Point Is - the Buffalo Bills beat the 49ers at San Francisco.  Anyone
>who's a football fan knows that the Bills had a big road field advantage in
>that game.  Yes, I'm talking road field advantage.  The 49ers, throughout the
>years, have been a much better team on the ROAD.  They're betting on the road
>then at home, and this includes Pasadena.  49ers 35, Bills 17 - should Buffalo
>even make it that far.

And anyone who is a football fan would *also* know that the Bills have been
historically *hideous* on grass!!!

Christ!

>** Rob **

					---Chet Zeshonski
From: v130pwbq@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: SUPER BOWL TALK: BILLS AND 49ERS
Date: 19 Nov 92 00:57:00 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Nov18.192739.18473@bnr.ca>, lowery@crchh497.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Gary Lowery) writes...
>In article <Bxx5My.1oM@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v130pwbq@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
>|> In article <92322.192615U58582@uicvm.uic.edu>, U58582@uicvm.uic.edu writes...
>|> >Even I like Bills, but your logic beats me a bit...
>|> >SO what if Bills beat 49ers the last time?
>|> >DOes it mean they will beat 49ers in the SB?
>|> >(they still might, but that's a different issue)
>|> >Wonder why the divison teams play with each other then?
>|> > 
>|> >This starts an interesting question.
>|> >Can anyone list the teams which in the SB beat teams they lost to in the
>|> >regular season, if any?
>|> 
>|> It seems like every year in the playoffs and the Super Bowl that if Team A
>|> had lost to team B in the regular season that come playoffs and Super Bowl
>|> that team A would beat team B.
>|> 
>|> The following are instances that come to mind:
>|> 
>|> 1991
>|> 
>|> regular season: San fran beat the Giants
>|> playoffs      : Giants beat San fran
>|> 
>|> regular season: Buffalo beat the Giants
>|> super Bowl    : Giants beat Buffalo
>|> 
>|> 1984
>|> 
>|> regular season: Miami beat San fran
>|> Super Bowl    : San fran beat Miami|> 
>|> I know that there exist many more instances, but off the top of my head I can't
>|> remember any more. Feel free to add on.
>|>     _____________________________________________________________________
>|>    |   Miami Dolphins and Hurricanes:        * Eric Orologio " Dr. O"    |
>|>    |   Two of the Best teams in Football!    * V130pwbq @ubvms           |
>|>    |_____________________________________________________________________|
>If I remember right, the 49ers lost only to Pittsburgh 20-17 in 1984.  I think
>an interception sealed the Pittburgh win.  The loss was at Candlestick.  19-0  
>would have been sweet, but 18-1 wasn't too bad.
> 
>GO NINERS!

My mistake. I believe I was thinking of the game they played in the 1983 season.
    _____________________________________________________________________
   |   Miami Dolphins and Hurricanes:        * Eric Orologio " Dr. O"    |
   |   Two of the Best teams in Football!    * V130pwbq @ubvms           |
   |_____________________________________________________________________|
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jim@scf16.scf.loral.com (Jim Livesey)
Subject: Menu In Dallas Tonight... Crow
Organization: Loral Space and Range Systems, Sunnyvale, CA
Distribution: rec
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 06:33:11 GMT


   To all you Dallas fans who thought the Rams were a cake walk...

  This Crows for you...
--

         _/  _/  _/         _/   ---  Jim Livesey
        _/  _/  _/_/     _/_/    ---  Loral Space and Range Systems
       _/  _/  _/  _/  _/ _/     ---  1260 Crossman Ave.  MS-S37
 _/   _/  _/  _/   _/_/  _/      ---  Sunnyvale, California  94089
  _/_/   _/  _/    _/   _/       ---  e-mail: jim@scf16.scf.loral.com
From: jdng90@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Gorsuch JDN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Montana throwing again...ho hum
Date: 20 Nov 92 11:25:45 GMT


  This week seven or eight starting QB's went down, possibly the 9ers
could loan super Joe to a team with a distinct shortage in the QB
department, this would have several advantages for SF, in that they
could see if Joe can still play without benching Young and be able to
get him back if Young goes down. It would also increase Montana's
value
in a trade if it can be seen that he is a great with two or three more
years left to play, rather than the best-ever with nothing more than a

full scrapbook. 

              jon
From: larry@aecom.yu.edu (Larry Simmons)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: SUPER BOWL TALK: BILLS AND 49ERS
Date: 18 Nov 92 18:15:53 GMT
Organization: Albert Einstein College of Med

In article <92322.192615U58582@uicvm.uic.edu> U58582@uicvm.uic.edu writes:
>
>This starts an interesting question.
>Can anyone list the teams which in the SB beat teams they lost to in the
>regular season, if any?

In 1990, the Giants lost to Buffalo during the regular season 17-13 (at the
Meadowlands) but beat them in SB XXV 20-19.

Interestingly, that same year the Giants lost to the 49ers during the regular
season 7-3, but beat them 15-13 in the NFC Championship game to get to the SB.

Those were the days...

Go Giants!
---
          Larry Simmons                        larry@aecom.yu.edu
  Research Information Technology        ...!{uunet,att}!alsys1!larry
Albert Einstein College of Medicine   ...!meadowlnds!sec_227!row_7!seat_19!me
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills vs. Dolphins
Date: 17 Nov 1992 17:49:24 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsd.csd.mu.edu

In article <97999@netnews.upenn.edu>, satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:

	stuff about fins/bills deleted

>satish nair
>go giants
>go saints (crush those nasty redskins so we can have a wild-card berth).

O.K. your wish will be granted soon. Giants go to playoffs
and Ray gets a 5 year contract extension


>

		******   ******
                     *   *
                ******   ******
                *        *    *
                ******   ******        and counting down .
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: PACKERS ICE PHILLY 27-24!!! YES!!!
Date: 16 Nov 92 14:50:30 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center

In article <1992Nov15.211715.7731@ncsu.edu>, delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE) writes...

> Get that NFC East garbage outta here!!!!! 

The NFC East was 0-5 yesterday, that ought to quiet them down for a 
while anyway.
From: dkl@cs.arizona.edu (David K. Lowenthal)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: BROWNS NEWS - Nov 16th (Charger game)
Date: 17 Nov 92 16:37:36 GMT
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <1992Nov17.072947.9282@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> mocnik@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:
>Browns News - Nov 16th
>- Once again the dog-pound showed its brains, or lack thereof, by throwing
>  snowballs throughout the game at the Chargers. Luckily no player was hurt.
>  Maybe these idiots should be allowed on the field and the players can then
>  pelt them !!!!!!!  This is completely uncalled for, and it is an 
>  embarrassment for the city of Cleveland and its good fans.

Is this some sort of surprise?  This happens at every Browns home game it seems.
Why can't they get security in order over there.  Pretty soon i am going to
claim that Modell orders no punishments because it helps the Browns to have
crap thrown at the opponents.  I want to see a game forfeited because of the 
thrown objects.

>- Look for Ed King to move to tackle next year. He is practicing there
>  on the "scout team". Freddie Childress then can go back to his natural
>  position of guard.

Freddie Childress's natural position is flipping burgers.  I still can't believe
the Bengals wasted a 2nd round pick on him.



--dave

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: keithg@boi.hp.com (Keith Glasson)
Subject: Re: Bills vs. Steelers Observations
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 12:49:04 GMT
Organization: work
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

JONNY B. GOODE (v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu) wrote:
: In article <BxFqAt.AxE@mail.boi.hp.com>, keithg@boi.hp.com (Keith Glasson) writes...
: > 
: >	I'm not a Bills-basher, but Buffalo is not a class team. A good
: >	team, yes, but not a class team.
: > 
: > 
: >	-keith
: 
: 	Not a class team?  That's your opinion, and I guess you're entitled to
: it.  However, since you don't live in Buffalo you do not see all the off-field
: contributions the players from this team makes.  BTW, if you're talking about
: Buffalo's on-field antics -- I think it all comes down to who wins the game, not
: how pretty or polite they look while doing it.  This is football, Keith, not
: etiquette class.
: 
: Jonny B.

--

	No, Jonny, I'm not talking about their on-field antics, and I do
	realize this is football. I'm a Raider fan, and have seen on-field
	antics unsurpassed in football. I'm talking about some members
	penchant for whining. I couldn't care less about how they act on
	the field, but thanks for letting me know the difference between
	football and etiquette.

	-keith


((((((((((((((((((((((((keithg@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
             _________________________________________________
            |                                                 |
            |Opinions? These aren't opinions, these are facts!|
            |_________________________________________________|
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Dan Dierdork
Date: 24 Nov 92 02:19:26 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


Hi,

This is not meant as a bust on the Eagles but it's been... oh say 3 minutes
into the MNF game and already Dan Dierdork has brought up the name of Seth
Joyner.  I realize that Joyner had a tremendous game against Houston last year
but calling Wilber Marshall a Seth Joyner-type is bordering on the ludicrous.
Maybe Joyner's PR person goes drinking with Dierdork?

satish nair
go giants
From: lyle5741@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re:Okoye
Date: 19 Nov 92 11:15:11 -0600
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

I had the EXACT same situation, but I got lucky.  I took a chance and started
Terry Allen (Min.) and Okoye (instead of Word).  He only rushed for 7 yds. with
8 carries, but the two TD's really helped!  
        But, this week I see that Word is pretty healthy, so I'm gonna start
him and PRAY!!!
        I really don't need to worry too much though, 'cause I'm second overall
and easily leasding my division by 2 games.  I've only lost 1 games overall and
that was week one, 'cause Miami (Marino) was idle due to the hurricane, and
nobody would trade me their QB.  
        But, here's my prediction for Word and Okoye:
Week 12 Predictions

          Rushing    Receiving    TD's

Word        85         46          1
Okoye       14          0          1

I don't think that's a bad guess, do you?
Well, that's all the help I have to offer.
Hope it helps!

Kurt

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: smith@lurch.jsc.nasa.gov (damon smith)
Subject: Re: !^@#~&*# America's Team (was Re: Thanksgiving)
Organization: MDSSC
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 00:44:03 GMT

|> >CBS will feature "The Resurgence of AMERICA'S TEAM" during the half time
|> >of the Cowboys and Giants game on Thanksgiving. Most of the NFL owners
|> >will certaintly say thanks to the Cowboys this Thursday for filling up their 
|> >stadium. Thank you god for the Cowboys and please let them keep winning. Amen.
|> 
|> Fans of other teams wishing to complain about this "America's Team" 
|> label can call CBS at 212-975-4321 (ask for sports).

Remember, CBS stands for "Cowboy Broadcasting System".
Cowboys!  America's Team.  God's Team.  

Damon Smith
Thanksgiving Prediction: Cowboys 28, Midgets 7
Organization: Freshman, CIT general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 15:49:55 -0500 
From: "Calvin D. Swartzentruber" <cs6t+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Eagles starting quarterback
	<By25Kt.G2s@mail.boi.hp.com>

Yes, his record is fairly well against the Giants.  However, the way
he's been playing recently, I wouldn't trust him to beat the _____(you
fill it in, I don't feel like getting flamed).  As they say, you are
only as good as your last game.  Also, I'm not much of a Randall fan. 
If he's not going to play any more consistently than he has been (when I
say consistently I mean not just this season but over the past few
years), I think they should start Jimmy Mac for the rest of the season,
and find a new starting quarterback for next year.  Cunningham may have
a lot of raw talent, but after however many years that he's been
playing, it should be a little more than that, raw talent.

Hobbes

A loyal Eagle in Pittsburgh

The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily held by my city,
my college, my family, or the guy who used to live next door to me when
I was a kid.

"Virtual reality has nothing on Calvin" Susie
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
Subject: Early Game FINALS
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 21:52:09 GMT

12th Week - Updates

Houston  16				Miami  19  * FINAL - Stoyvanonich 52 yd FG!
Atlanta  14				Buffalo  41  * FINAL
Detroit	19 			Cincinnati  13  * FINAL
Green Bay  17			Chicago  3  * FINAL
Philadelphia  47		NY Giants  34  * FINAL
Cleveland  13		   Minnesota  17  * FINAL
Indianapolis  14		Pittsburgh  30  * FINAL
-- 
        ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
 		"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
	       is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
From: ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Kenny, the best backup around
Date: 24 Nov 92 02:33:06 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <BILLMS.92Nov23101033@gip.eecs.umich.edu> billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>In article <By5zt7.4Du@acsu.buffalo.edu> v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (JONNY B. GOODE) writes:
>
>	   Just a quick mention of the so-called 'mediocrity' of Kenneth Davis.
>
>	   Can you say 181 yards rushing?  I knew ya could.
>
>	   NOW do you think he could start for just a *few* more teams?  
>
>No.

Agreed... One big game does not a superstar make. 



-- 
Ronnie
-------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not cynical... I just don't believe in anything....


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: stavish@purch.Columbia.NCR.COM ()
Subject: Re: Christie saves Bills
Organization: NCR Corp, E&M-Columbia, Columbia, SC
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 18:38:29 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.131645.8779@iscsvax.uni.edu> lyle5741@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:
>O.K. so maybe the Dolphins DID lose on Monday night, but at the half they were
>clearly the better team.  I agree that the Bills did win the game and I'm not
>saying that they didn't deserve to win, but if the Dolphins can avoid things
>like the 3rd quarter drought they had, they could beat anyone.  What I want to
>know is how in hell did Buffalo win?
>        Without their kicker Steve Christie, they're nothing!  Thomas only had
>only a little more than 100 yds. tot. off. and NO tD's.  Kelly didn't have a
>good night.  Neither Lofton or Beebe had long catches.  
>        As for the Dolphins, Marino was spectacular 300+ yds. passing with 2
>TD's.  His receivers caught nearly everything.  Higgs kept the running game
>going!
>        As a Dolphin fan, I'd just like to say that I think the Bills got
>lucky.  Granted, they pulled it off, but not my playing well.  Hey Shula...
>
>Good Game!!!!!
>
>    Kurt
>        
>(LYLE5741@iscsvax.uni.edu)

Yes, this is so true. I mean the Bills are only what... 2nd in the NFL in
total offense, and it is ALL Because of Steve Christie!!!  Christie's 260
points for this year is definitely some major accomplishment.  I suggest
reality is a REAL GOOD THING!  BTW the Bills have not given up a 100 yard
rushing game yet this year and Miami's stellar 64 yard combined performance
(9 yards less than the terrible Thomas) sure proved that Higgs kept that
running game smokin'!

                          The Martman

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: martens@carp.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens)
Subject: Re: What the Bears need.
Organization: Ohio State U. Dept. of Computer Science
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:14:24 GMT

In article <23NOV199215151897@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov> vollmer@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov (Bruce Vollmer) writes:
>In article <1992Nov23.182329.1850@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes...
>>v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:
>>>They need a coach who can get the players motivated.
>>>They don't need a coach who yells at his players [...]

>>My wild prediction for 1992/93:

>>	Bo Schembechler, the next head coach of the Chicago Bears.

>>You heard it here first.

>Pretty wild ..... just what the Bears need, another run-happy coach.
>Yeah, that's the ticket, they'll run the Wing-T   :-)
>And wear leather helmets   :-)

Actually, Bo Schembechler's gonna be coaching at Ohio State next fall.
-- 
      "C'mon, what's the big hold up?!  Let's go, up there!
		  Bring on the snow!"  -- Calvin

-- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)
From: david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles vs. 49ers:  what'll happen
Date: 21 Nov 92 03:00:53 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu


In article <98592@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
|In article <1ejm5iINNijo@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright) writes:
|>
|> 
|>The 49ers are number 1 in Rushing offense for the past 3 weeks. 
|
|Actually, the GIANTS were #1 two weeks ago.

Correct. The niners were number 2, then rose to number 1 for the past
two weeks. Still, the numbers imply they are a good rushing team.

|>They have
|>fallen from the number 1 passing team to the fourth rated passing
|>team. 
|
|Actually, they are the second rated passing team.

No, they have been fourth for two weeks now. Three weaks ago they were
number 2. 

|>Rickey Waters is now, I think, the fourth rated rusher in the
|>NFC, and something similiar for the NFL. 
|
|This is correct (Smith, Hampton and Cleveland Gary are the first 3).

Waters is the number 6th rusher over all.

|>Steve Young is not only the
|>leagues highest rated passer, but in the top ten rushers of the NFC.
|>
|
|Actually, nope.  He's only got 400+ rushing yards which is great by
|any standards but the NFC backs have been superlative this year.

Well, according to the San Fransisco Chronicle, it puts him at number
12, with 422 yards.  Still, it is suprising.


-- 
"There is nothing in the marginal conditions that     
    distinguish a mountain from a mole hill"            
                      Kenneth Boulding                             

					All comments  are mine---(David Wright) 
						david@cats.ucsc.edu.
From: GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: BILLS WIN!!!!
Date: 18 Nov 1992 09:38:50 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <BxvJnK.Kt3@acsu.buffalo.edu>,
kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) writes:

>In article <1ebb3eINNsth@morrow.stanford.edu> GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold) writes:
>>In article <BxuJJ8.Mqp@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>,
>>wlay@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Radio 90.1 FM WLAY Tarkington Hall) writes:
>>>WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFF!!!!!!
>>>
>>>Bills 26, Fish 20
>>>
>>>Just got done hearing a dolfan complain about the officiating... there were
>>>calls BOTH ways close enough that I wouldn't want to have to make the call!
>>>But, a minor reality check: IT'S OVER!! There is nothing you can do about
>>>it!!
>>
>>There were bad calls both ways, but the worst had to be in the
>>closing minutes of the game when Kelly clearly intentionally
>>grounded the ball back on the Buffalo 2.  Considering that Buffalo

>If I hear one more idiot say that, I'm going to scream. Look at the replay.
>McKeller was right there. Kelly threw the ball to McKeller. McKeller did
>not drop the ball. Incomplete pass. End of story. This was about the only
>good call all night by those incompetant refs who are probably janitors at
>Joe Robbie Stadium, but had to fill in for an absent officiating crew.

Yes McKeller was standing there. But Kelly was hardly trying to pass
the ball.  There is a difference in passing the ball while
scrambling as compared to getting rid of the ball with hopes of
avoiding a sack. And Kelly was clearly trying to avoid a sack by
throwing the ball at any white jersey. Kelly was trying to
just get rid of the ball, thus intentionally grounding the ball to
avoid a sack.  It is a boarder line call though.
Maybe it was a good call in your eyes, but I'm sure there are
others who won't agree.  And just because these people don't agree
with you, what the hells gives you the right to call them an idiot?
Are you an expert at making intelligent analysis of this game? Or
perhaps just another bias fan rooting for his team?

                                                     Tony
                                                  GO 49ERS!!!
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.pro:24164 dc.redskins:239
From: st1ge@Rosie.UH.EDU (Edward Hui)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 49ers release Green
Date: 19 Nov 1992 07:19:12 GMT
Organization: University of Houston
Reply-To: st1ge@Rosie.UH.EDU
NNTP-Posting-Host: rosie.uh.edu

In article <1992Nov18.223940.27348@netcom.com>, mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers) writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.202053.18837@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com> marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com writes:
>>This move frees up a roster spot which was not immediately filled. The
>>most obvious choice is to activate Dexter Carter, but the 49ers are going
>>to wait a day or two to see how the tight end situation develops. Brent
>>Jones is still sore from last week's game, and if he's not available to
>>play then they only have Jamie Williams at tight end.
  
  What about Wesley Walls, is he ready to comeback?

>If it were up to me, I'd use my five reactivations *before* bringing
>the Midget back.  He's more likely to clear waivers than some of the
>others (Montana comes to mind).
>
     I agreed.  Dexter Carter won't be a big help right now as Watters
is doing everything right.  The only reason that the Niners would want
to bring him back will be to showcase him for an off-season trade.  


Edward Hui
Organization: Sophomore, Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA