From: smgarvin@nyx.cs.du.edu (susan garvin)
Subject: Re: And Garvin's Down! (was Re: K.O., 0: 10 of 1st Round (WAS Re
 Would Susan B. Anthony be pro-life?)
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Keywords: POC
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 22:47:33 GMT

In article <1992Jul27.211358.5944@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (St
phen A Chaney) writes:
>In article <1992Jul23.184858.241012@cs.cmu.edu> garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susa
 Garvin) writes:
>>In article <1992Jul23.164954.3957@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (
tephen A Chaney) writes:
>>#In article <1992Jul22.165113.24546@advtech.uswest.com> steven@jaynes (
Steve Novak) writes:
>>## = Susan "Lies Exposed for Free" Garvin writes:
>>#### = Stephen A Chaney steps into a four foot cowpie:
>>##
>>###[text deleted]
>>###
>>####This is the same Margaret Sanger who said, in one breath, that
>>####abortion was wrong, and then died of one? 
>>####
>>####And don't say that isn't true; Planned Parenthood themselves, in th
ir
>>####big Sanger's Birthday celebration ads, talked about her death by an
>>####illegal abortion. 
>>####
>>####Don't even TRY to escape from this one, Garvin.
>>##
>>###Margaret Sanger was born in 1883 and died in 1966.  
>>###
>>###Feel free to try to squirm out of this one, Chahallney.
>>##
>>##Oh, MAN.  You shouldn't use a sledgehammer on someone's nuts.  Betwee
 him and
>>##Holtsinger, they *may* send a hitman after you :).
>>#
>>#Well, you forgot the other 99% of that Susan B. Anthony article that
>>#gave it to you guys on the chin. 
>>#
>>#That and now, Susan Garvin has herself called Planned Parenthood a
>>#bold-faced liar. 
>>
>>No, Chaney, I called you a liar.
>>
>>We have no evidence that PP said anything of the sort,
>>other than your claim that they did.  Your credibility, like
>>Holtsinger's, is nonexistent.  (Your anti-Semitic version
>>of a NYT article comes immediately to mind.)
>
>It was in the Sacramento News & Review's Women's Issue last year. 
>
Right.  Sanger was born in 1883, so Planned Parenthood celebrated
her birthday in 1991.  Only you, Dennis, could try to convince
anyone of this.

>>Can you prove that PP said this?  They laughingly denied

>>any such advertisement.  I'm sure that if the ads really
>>existed, you would be able to produce verifiable proof.
>
>I just did. 
>
No, you didn't.  You just made up a source.  Give us a date,
Hall, and give us the text of the ad. (Go look up proof
in the dictionary.  The look up verifiable.)

>>I'm willing to ask the readership who they believe.  Are
>>you?
>>
>>#That's a punch that ought to kill her, much less score a KO. 
>>
>>No, Chaney, your lies, like those of your cohorts in falsehood,
>>cannot hurt me.  I have the truth on my side.  You have only
>>your own fantasies and those of the others, who, like you,
>>have no integrity.
>
>Your fantasies outsize and vastly replace reality. 
>
Another odd Chahallneyism.  (Talk of *my* fantasies from someone
who thinks that he is either a spaceship or an airplane is
amusing, to say the least.)

>And you call that TRUTH? 
>
Yes, POC, I call it truth.  You have no integrity and you
spend far too much time fantasizing.

>>There's your answer, Steve.  More smoke from the A.B.  
>>
>>
>>
>>#		  Pro-Choice means pro-adult/child sex! 
>>
>>Projecting again, Chaney?  I realize that your Church seems to
>>be supportive of such acts, but you should remember that it
>>is *your* church.
>
>What does a church have to do with me? 
>
You have stated publicly that you are a member of the
Roman Catholic Church.

>Go ahead, bitch - try and tack religious motivation on me. Go ahead.
>I'll smoke that article out of your ass for the next month and you'll
>be farting your brains along with it. Which means your bra will
>deflate all the way down to an A cup.  
>
My, my, another stunning piece of logic from the Airplane Boy.
How on earth do you intend to do this?  You have yet to refute
a single point made by another writer on this newsgroup.  You've
lied, and you've threatened, but that's about the extent of your
showing.  


>You're crossing the wrong person's path playing "church" with me -
>back off now or you'll be monstrously embarrassed. Not that you're not
>headed that way already with this news-thread.  
>
How in the world could you embarass me, Dennis?  By calling
me childish names or guessing about my body parts?  Here's
a small clue - your actions should embarass you, but they
can hardly reflect on me.  I am certainly not responsible
for the joke which is Steve Chaney.

If you wish to repudiate your church, then do so.  

>FACT: In Florida, the right to privacy which abortion is founded on,
>has been expanded to the right of adults to screw little girls. FACT,

>
No, the case gave the right to consent to 15 year olds. 
It said nothing about little girls.  Your church, on the
other hand, seems to impose no age limits as long as
the perpetrator wears a collar.


>
>
>  I'd flame pro-choice women in general today, but I'm not that vicious 
et.

Flame away.  Your viciousness is well known.  Luckily, you
have neither the intelligence nor physical prowess to 
carry out your threats.

>Still, history shows that pro-choice means pro-adult/child sex! 

Keep lying, Hall.  I doubt that you can post without doing so.


Susan
g2}

Newsgroups: talk.abortion