HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: Plug Pulled on Spike Lee's "Malcolm X"
Reply-To: reiher@onyx.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Peter Reiher)
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 15:10:46 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.220503.4116@mahendo.jpl.nasa.gov> reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov (Peter Reiher) writes:
>A recent article in the business section of the LA Times said that
>the completion bond company has just pulled the plug on Spike Lee's
>uncompleted film, "Malcolm X".  

>Lee has produced a 4 hour rough cut of "Malcolm X"
>already, and was contractually obligated to produce a three hour
>cut, at the longest.  The completion bond company apparently wants
>a cut around 2 hours, or a little longer, 

Another article in yesterday's LA Times had further clarification.
Lee is contractually obligated (to the original studio, not just the
completion bond company) to produce a 2 hr. and 15 minute movie.  The
completion bond company wants to hold him to the contract.  The issue
does indeed seem to be a battle over the length of the film, rather than
whether the film will be completed or how much more money will be spent.

Lee has taken a big risk with "Malcolm X".  All along, apparently he
was determined that he would make a 3 hour film costing around $33 million.
When the studio would only authorize $28 million, and demanded a 2 hr.,
15 minute film, Lee signed, but seems to have never intended to honor
those clauses.  In today's Hollywood, this is a very risky maneuver,
indeed.  If he prevails, and if the film is a big hit, all will be forgiven.
If he prevails, and the film is a flop, Lee will probably have trouble
getting his next film made the way he wants it.  If he doesn't prevail,
then Lee will lose a great deal of bargaining clout for future films,
regardless of how the film does - if it's a flop, it's his fault; if it's
a hit, the wisdom of the studio/completion bond company will have saved
the film.  For that reason, (along with his sincere belief that "Malcolm
X" requires 3 hrs. to be a good film) I expect Lee to go to the mat for the 
long version.

			Peter Reiher
			reiher@onyx.jpl.nasa.gov
			. . . cit-vax!elroy!jato!jade!reiher
From: leeper@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Mark R. Leeper)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: NEWSIES
Date: 8 Apr 92 00:52:02 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Apr7.144529.17411@ms.uky.edu> fehr@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Davis) writes:
> mark.r.leeper writes:
> >	  Capsule review:  The story of the 1899 newsboy strike
> >     in New York City is told with about the same liberty that
> >     MATEWAN took. 

> There is an odd tone to this capsule that needs a clarification. What do     
> _you_ mean when you say "the same liberty that MATEWAN took." 

You are probably right that it is ambiguous.  It is a bunch of
fictional characters placed on top of a real historical event.  There
are probably two real characters in NEWSIES, Pulitzer and Roosevelt.
There may not be that many in MATEWAN.


				Mark Leeper
				...att!mtgzy!leeper
				(908)957-5619
From: 00kacolson@bsu-ucs.uucp
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Info on Michael Biehn?????
Date: 6 Apr 92 14:24:46 GMT

After watching Aliens for the 10th time this weekend, and then renting
Navy Seals I have to ask...
    DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY INFO ON MICHAEL BIEHN (Hope I spelled that right!)???

Also, if anyone knows where I might find a copy of the Navy Seals movie
poster I'd greatly appreciate it!

			Thanks!
			Kim Colson
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.tv
From: winicur@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Zev Winicur)
Newsgroups: alt.sex,rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Censoship of nudity (was Re: Photo of minor: is it illegal to possess?
Date: 7 Apr 92 02:45:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: beagle.winicur.702614718
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder

First of all, Charles Martin Smith does at least one full frontal nudity
scene in "Never Cry Wolf."  You may remember him as the accountant in "The
Untouchables" (with Kevin Costner).

Second of all, "Doc Hollywood" has a full frontal nudity scene (albeit from a
small distance) of his love interest.  Her name escapes me at the moment. 

The movie "1984", which I do believe came out in '85, has a couple of full
frontal shots of the main woman.

Any more?

   


_______     __   ,     _____/  *
      |       \       /  |     *  Zev Winicur
      |        \         |     *  winicur@beagle.colorado.edu
______|_    |   \        |     *
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: ScriptWriter??????
From: rivero@mdcbbs.com
Date: 7 Apr 92 12:56:42 GMT
Organization: M&E (Division of EDS), Cypress CA
Nntp-Posting-User: rivero

In article <sbb1.702606942@Ra.MsState.Edu>, sbb1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Shay B. Berthelson) writes:
> I have a bunch of ideas for movie scripts and plays, has anyone ever heard
> or seen a program that will help you organize a script.  Sort of like
> a word processor that will give you options such as: Direction(Places the
> text in a larger margin or italics), Character choices( let you pick a         
> character from a pre determined list or add one, with a set of certain 
> keys), story line ( lets you tree a story line or concept so you can better
> follow ur idea)?  I don't know if this exist or not.  If it doesn't is 
> there any one who would be interested in helping to program such a word
> processor?
> 

  There are several, all for the PC. I'm not impressed with them; I get
along fine with WP5.O and some macros. However, any of the "trades" always
has ads for several you can choose from.

  A better tool to get is an "outliner". This is an outline processor and can
work wonders for the structure of your story. You use it as an electronic 
version of "instant story", a technique taught at USC film school. The technique
originated with the use of 3x5 file cards, on each one of which went a single
motivational unit (what actors call a "beat"). A single card has one
interaction, i.e. Spock tells Kirk that he has bad breath - Kirk Punches out
Spock. When the focus of the scene shifts, you are onto a new card.

  By shuffling the cards around, you can see why a story works, or more 
importantly, why it DOESN'T. Prior to computerization, I used color 
coded cards. White for primary story line, blue for subplot, and so on 
down to story elements linked to specific characters. 

  

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|  Michael Rivero rivero@mdcbbs.com Homo Cyberneticus-Computational Man  |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|    EARLY RESULTS FROM THE NEW YORK PRIMARY!                            |
|    Clinton                                              17%            |
|    Brown                                                22%            |
|    Elvis in the white jumpsuit                          57%            |
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: pol30546@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Peder Larsen)
Subject: Re: Plug Pulled on Spike Lee's "Malcolm X"
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 19:09:28 GMT

mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Ed McCreary) writes:

>In article <1992Apr11.152001.4184@panix.com> tkelsey@panix.com (Tom Kelsey) writes:
>>My feeling is that if he is 'going to the mat' for all this 'artistic'
>>integrity he's nuts.  Its a film I feel no one wants to see any way..
>>The 'whites' will stay away in DROVES...  

	I'm interested in hearing why you think 'whites' will stay away
from the film.  I've been looking forward to this film for over a year
and I can guarantee that it will be a big hit here at the University of
Illinois, which by the way is composed mainly of white, suburban Chicago
kids like me :)
From: jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Eroticism without nudity
Date: 10 Apr 92 22:25:26 GMT
	<1992Apr8.113305.54297@cc.usu.edu>
	<1992Apr9.034858.22093@amhux2.amherst.edu>
	<92101.002538KSNIDVON@ESOC.BITNET>
Organization: Bear, Stearns & Co. - FAST
In-reply-to: KSNIDVON@ESOC.BITNET's message of 10 Apr 92 21:14:37 GMT



In article <92101.002538KSNIDVON@ESOC.BITNET> KSNIDVON@ESOC.BITNET writes:

   re: the nude scene with ellen barkin & al pacino in the "sea of love".

   i'm sure she has a body double in this scene. watch it again - you never
   actually see her face in the full length nude shot.

   does anyone know for certain?

   mind you, it was definitely all her in "siesta" (or fiesta?).

Yes, it is.  

I HIGHLY recommend _Siesta_.  Great movie.  Great cast.  Great music. 
Watch it.


				Josh Diamond
				AKA Spidey!!!


--
 /\ \  / /\  Josh Diamond    / NOTE THE EVEN  \        		    jmd@bear.com
//\\ .. //\\ AKA Spidey!!!   \ NEWER ADDRESS! /    ...!ctr.columbia.edu!ursa!jmd
//\((  ))/\\
/  < `' >  \          Beauty is the purgation of superfluities. -- Michaelangelo
From: dvlmal@cs.umu.se (Mats Arvendal)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: New versions Aliens, The Abyss, Bladerunner ?
Date: 9 Apr 92 21:23:35 GMT
Organization: Dep. of Info.Proc, Umea Univ., Sweden

I've heard some roumors that new video-releases of Alien, The Abyss and 
Bladerunner coming out this spring.  Anyone else heard something about this?
From: eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu (Virany Margaret Kreng)
Subject: Re: BASIC INSTINCT (Spoilers!) Who did who?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 8 Apr 92 01:01:00 GMT
Distribution: world 

In article <1992Apr7.185639.26553@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> craigb@ot.austin.ibm.com writes:

[ stuff deleted ]
>
>Odd thing about this movie is that of the 3 people I've talked
>to who've seen it, none of us can agree on who killed who. It
>seems like everytime someone comes up with a reasonable answer,
>someone else finds something to shoot it down.
>
>Craig

Have to agree with you there, Craig.  The reason for this is... there is no 
reason.  Like you said, any reasonable answer will be shot down.  Oh well.
This movie is so bad IMHO that I wouldn't waste any time trying to figure
out.

Virany 
eabu202@orion.oac.uci.edu

"Jack the Ripper was none other than the Loch Ness monster!"
"It's great to be young and insane."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Quote at the end of "Patton"
From: bill@mathnx.math.byu.edu (Bill Smith)
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 21:32:14 GMT
Organization: Brigham Young University -- Mathematics Department

Where does the quote come from that is used at the end of "Patton"
about Roman generals riding through Rome in triumph with the slave
standing behind in the Chariot saying "all glory is fleeting" [or
something like that]??  Please email and I will post if there is
interest.  Thanks.
-Bill

--
Professor William V. Smith
Phone: 1-801-378-2061 Fax: 1 801 378 2800
email: smithw@hamblin.math.byu.edu  or  uunet!hamblin.math.byu.edu!smithw
NeXTmail: bill@mathnx.math.byu.edu
SMail: Math Dept. -- 314 TMCB; BYU; Provo, UT 84602 (USA)
From: steinarb@idt.unit.no (Steinar Bang)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Info on Michael Biehn?????
Date: 7 Apr 92 12:06:37 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway

>>>>> On 6 Apr 92 14:24:46 GMT, 00kacolson@bsu-ucs.uucp said:

> After watching Aliens for the 10th time this weekend, and then
> renting Navy Seals I have to ask...  DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY INFO ON
> MICHAEL BIEHN (Hope I spelled that right!)???

His most remarkable appearance so far (IMHO, of course), was as Kyle
Reese in "Terminator" (James Cameron, 1984).

"Doctor,... is Reese crazy?"
"In medical terms,... he's a loon!"

- Steinar
From: haraldf@stud.cs.uit.no (Harald Marius Fusdahl)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Taxi Driver stinks
Date: 9 Apr 92 12:29:49 GMT
Organization: University of Tromsoe, Norway

A couple of weeks ago me and some friends of mine went to the moviestore and
rented what we thought was a cult movie, Taxi Driver. We could not belive our own 
eyes it was so mindboggling boring. Can you people out there tell me what so
fucking great about it. Personally i think Martin Scorceses smoked his own socks
before he directed that movie. The only entertainment in the movie was the last
ten minutes of the movie. but the Norwegian film control cut all the shit to
pices. So you people out there give in and say that you agree with me!.


ANY  PROBLEM CAN BE SOLVED WITH A CLUB, IF THE PROBLEM CAN'T BE SOLVED WITH
A CLUB THEN IT IS NOT PROBLEM AND IT CAN BE IGNORED UNTIL IT DISAPIRES.

yousforever
Haraldf
From: eamayne@eos.ncsu.edu (ELIZABETH ANNE MAYNE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: name of 1990 french film
Date: 15 Apr 92 16:01:40 GMT
Reply-To: eamayne@eos.ncsu.edu (ELIZABETH ANNE MAYNE)
Organization: Project EOS - North Carolina State University

wondering if anyone can help me with the name of a film. i saw it reviewed 
while in england in the spring of 1990. it came out at the same time as
trop belle pour toi (too beautiful for you).  they billed it as an anti-yuppie
film.

any ideas?

thanks

	beth
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dododge@wam.umd.edu (David O. Dodge)
Subject: Re: fantasy movies
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 07:44:20 GMT

In article <5534@mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx>, al162766@mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx (Giraldo Hierro Sandoval) writes:
> 
>  I probably shouldn't mention this, but... if you like
> kiddie-type-fantasy, there's always:
 
>  NeverEnding Story I & II.

I'll second this in the case of NeverEnding Story I *ONLY*

>  Haven't seen NE-S II, but I was OK. Great soundtrack, too!

Part I was great, part II stunk. But then I'm probably biased against
it because I was hoping they'd do the rest of the book with II.

Also when they did part II they aimed it as a very young audience (the
Saturday morning cartoon crowd), and put in things like baby rockbiters
and laser beams (ugh!).

Last I heard, part III was in the works (using some of the stuff from
the book that they didn't use in part II -- and there's plenty of such
material), and the producer says if all goes well a part IV might even
be possible.

                                         -Dave Dodge/dododge@wam.umd.edu
From: spencer@tan.Princeton.EDU (S. Spencer Sun)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: on an unrelated subject...
Summary: RTFM!
Date: 6 Apr 92 17:43:43 GMT
Article-I.D.: Princeto.1992Apr6.174343.14837
Organization: Princeton Univ. Class of '94
Originator: news@ernie.Princeton.EDU

It would be nice if certain people would find out how to use their news
reader to start a new thread, so we don't end up with ridiculous
followups like "Is there an Impromptu soundtrack" attached to "Why isn't
Sarah dead in T2?"

Maybe it's just me, but it seems to me that this newsgroup has a higher
ratio of people who obviously don't know how to post except by doing a
followup.

And it does matter, because those of us using threaded news readers have
to select the entire thread, thus I had to select all the T2 posts to
get to the Impromptu one.  OK, a little extra work, no big deal, except
that it happens all too often.

Anyway.  Just a suggestion.
From: v115p8d6@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Quenby M Chunco)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Darkman - Crap?
Date: 5 Apr 92 19:55:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <32111@darkstar.ucsc.edu>, rod@cats.ucsc.edu (Rodrick Su) writes...
> 
>	My own favorite scene:
>	
>		Darkman caught up with one of the bad guy and have a nice
>		little chat with the guy in the sewar, and than promptly
>		stick the guy onto the surface to be crush by (from bad
>		guy's POV really fast moving) cars.

Don't forget the unforgettable dialogue!
               guy: But I've already told you everything I know!
             drkmn: I know...but lets pretend you didn't!

great scene.

> 
>		Darkman's ride on the Copters, that is a classic sequence.
>-- 
>[ Rodrick Su           ]<----------------------------------------------------] 
>[--------------------->[ `Belief is a concept that Ring does not believe in.']
>[ rod@cats.ucsc.edu    ]----------------------->[ ``Emerald Eyes''           ] 
>[ rod@ucscb.ucsc.edu   ]----------------------->[   Danield Keys Moran       ]
From: conrad@brahms.udel.edu (Jon Conrad)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Ingrid Bergman & Oscar & Murder on the Orient Express
Date: 8 Apr 92 18:44:44 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

In article <1992Apr08.155144.21182@uvmark.uucp> scholl@uvmark.uucp (Kathryn Scholl) writes:

>I was watching "Murder on the Orient Express" a couple of weeks ago
...
>and during the first break, the host talked about Ingrid Bergman's
>Oscar-winning performance for Best Supporting Actress.

>Well, I was now ready to pay attention to this performance, but my god,
>she couldn't have been in the movie for more than about 5 complete
>minutes (I know, amount of time is not important, especially in the
>light of Hopkins/SOTL/Best Actor), but the "Oscar-winning performance"???

Be accurate.  It was more like 15 or 20.  Quite a respectable length for
a supporting performance.

>She appeared to be sloughing through the role, unimportant as it was,
>without a care or clue!  Yuck!  Did she REALLY win BSA that year?

Yes, she really did win.  And I don't know what you have against her to
describe her performance the way you did.  What was wrong with it?
(Your criticisms are too generalized to rebut.)

>I know, I know, it's all impression, perception, competition, etc.,
>but who else was nominated that year?  Was Ingrid "due" for a
>sentimental award or something?

Well, aside from it being (IMHO) a good performance, it can be noted
that it was a "change of pace" at that point in Bergman's career.  She's
been playing noble great ladies, usually long-suffering and rather
boring.  Suddenly here she was being nervous and uptight and
(intentionally) funny.  It was almost as if she was spoofing her own
image, in particular her ever-so-genteel missionary in "The Inn of the
<6th?> Happiness."  People had forgotten how entertaining she could be,
and indeed she had had to browbeat the director into casting her in this
part.  He had thought she wasn't "the type" and wanted her for the
Russian princess instead.  Perhaps this aspect of her performance isn't
as clear if one sees the movie alone at home, rather than with an
audience, but she got the biggest laughs in the movie.

The other nominees, to answer your question, were
Valentina Cortese, "Day for Night"
Talia Shire, "Godfather II"
Diane Ladd, "Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore"
Madeline Kahn, "Blazing Saddles"

Those were all good in their own ways, but I have no problem with
choosing Bergman.

Jon Alan Conrad
From: cotsonas@uci.edu (Bruce Cotsonas)
Subject: Re: WHITE MEN CAN'T JUMP
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 15 Apr 92 22:29:54 GMT

Please ignore the recent flames about WHITE MEN CAN'T JUMP.   It is a 
very, very funny movie.  The film is an outrageous, comic fantasy about 
street-hustle basketball.  Harrelson, Snipes and Perez are great.  I saw 
this with a racially-mixed audience and everyone was laughing and having a 
great time.


Bruce
cotsonas@uci.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.tv
From: al162766@mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx (Giraldo Hierro Sandoval)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: fantasy movies
Date: 7 Apr 92 17:07:59 GMT
Organization: I.T.E.S.M. Campus Monterrey


 I probably shouldn't mention this, but... if you like
kiddie-type-fantasy, there's always:

 NeverEnding Story I & II.

 Haven't seen NE-S II, but I was OK. Great soundtrack, too!


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The trick to flying is knowing how | Giraldo Hierro, Sinistrad, me, at:
 to fall and miss the ground."      |    pa250225@mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: tap1040@venus.tamu.edu (SPEED RACER)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Beauty and the Beast Flames
Keywords: author=K.Johnson
Date: 9 Apr 92 06:47:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <28737@brahms.udel.edu>, conrad@brahms.udel.edu (Jon Conrad) writes...
>In article <1467@celia.UUCP> celia!neil@usc.edu (Neil Richmond) writes:
> 
>>In our last discussion, someone sugessted that I was wrong that the prince
> ...deletions...
>Here's an alternative explanation.  The "for 10 long years" business
>need not necessarily apply to the duration of the curse.  We know that
>the Prince was surly and inhospitable.  Maybe the servants had had no
>opportunity to "show off" for a guest in that time, but the curse took
>effect only 5 or 6 years ago when he offended the enchantress.  His
>personality problems were in place before the enchantment was.



Actually, the candlestick says, "For ten years we've been rusting.  Needing
so much more than dusting.  Some excercise; a chance to use our skills"  In
the song, "Be Our Guest".  Now I don't know about you, but most people I know
don't rust.  This suggests to me that they have indeed been under the spell
for ten years.  However, I'm not sure that the prince was 11 when the 
enchantress cast the spell on him because there was never anything said 
about his 21st birthday.  The movie said his 21st YEAR.  

________________________________________________________________________________

                                 -SPEED RACER-                    
                                     Tracy      
                              Texas A&M University
                                   WHOOP!!!!
________________________________________________________________________________
From: amcalind@cs.strath.ac.uk (Anthony McAlinden IE91)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Father of the Bride - actress question
Date: 14 Apr 92 15:38:48 GMT
Organization: Comp. Sci. Dept., Strathclyde Univ., Glasgow, Scotland.
Originator: amcalind@fleming-04


Hi, I just saw "Father of the Bride" at the weekend, and wondered if the
_extremely_ nice actress who played Steve Martin's daughter - the bride, in
other words, has appeared in any other movies?

I think her name was Kimberly Williams - but I could be wrong (if I'm right,
she has no listing in the actress list)

Any info appreciated.

					Tony

PS. I actually though "Father of the Bride" was a pretty good film - it was
much better than I had expected - but I guess that Steve Martin's facial
expressions can make a movie! "Cape Fear" is still my film of the year to 
date, though!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: a0s5108@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Neal and Mara Priestly)
Subject: Re: "THUNDERHEART"
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 14:41:42 GMT

In article <1992Apr17.031436.6052@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> leeper@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Mark R. Leeper) writes:
>I am reminded in this discussion a little of my experience with the TV
>series MASH.

[deletions not relevant to my point]

> It was clear the writers did not want to
>take any chances that you might agree with the "wrong" side.  They were
>in a not very subtle way stacking the deck to make their political
>viewpoint seem like the only one that any reasonable person could
>espouse. 

[deletions]

>They appeared to have no faith in the strength of their own arguments.

[deletions]

>As it is he sidestepped the issues entirely and turned it into a
>purely good guys against bad guys film.  Now the fact that somebody
>close to the situation says that it really is a good guys against bad
>guys situation is not going to convince me this is a better film.
>
>				Mark Leeper

You said it better than I could have, though I was talking about 
(here come the flames) _Thelma and Louise_. 

-Neal Priestly
You've seen my disclaimer, Figure it out.
'Killed by pirates is good...' Fred Savage, The Princess Bride

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies