From: chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu (Steve Chaney : Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.0)
Subject: "Anti-Abortion" is a DEAD label. It's PRO-LIFE.
Originator: chaneysa@nextnet
Organization: California State University Sacramento
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 15:50:48 GMT


The National Right to Life Committee has proven to Coat Hanger terrorists
like Mark Kaufman and all the nuts I've seen dwelling on
alt.abortion.inequity, that your "anti-abortion" and "anti-choice" labels,
no longer work.

The NRLC takes positions on abortion, euthanasia, as well as coerced
starvation, the killing of anencephalic infants, and human experimentation.

Now, how is the NRLC an anti-abortion organization, when they piled onto
the Christine Busalacchi case to prevent her from being starved to death?
Anti-choice? Well, anti the father's (Pete's) choice to kill his daughter.
So to be pro-choice and politically correct, a child's life must lie in the
hands of a murderous and death-oriented father who can't wait to kill his
own kid because she doesn't fit his standard of living... Heh heh. I can
see you squirming now.

But WAIT. Baby Theresa is next. Our poor anencephalic infant who died
shortly after birth. Her parents wanted to kill her for organ transplants.
Pro-lifers had quite a hand in stopping that, I believe.
ANTI-ABORTION? What did abortion have to do with the Baby Theresa case? Can
anyone answer that?

Proposition 119, the Euthanasia bill of the century, in Washington state:
wiped out by pro-lifers at the ballot box.
What does abortion have to do with this pro-life action? Does opposition to
legalized Euthanasia mean an "anti-abortion movement"?

Come on, pro-aborts. Where is all that "anti-abortion" bull now? Clearly,
we have spread as more of your anti-life principles continue to invade our
society, screaming for the power to take more unwanted human lives, even
though they're innocent of any crimes.


NOW:

Where is your "pro-choice" when Marijuana comes to issue? Don't marijuana
users have a right to control their own bodies? Can't they have a right to
privacy to use marijuana as a recreational drug in the privacy of their own
homes, without fear of prosecution by the law? Where is that freedom of
choice outside of abortion, eh? As for me, I have no problems - I
consistently am willing to thrash privacy rights for harmful acts,
marijuana included. (But I'm perfectly willing to preserve privacy rights
for non-harmful things, as you also know about me.)

Obviously, your "pro-choice" stance is a bunch of b.s. Seeing as that no
pro-choice organization in America, from Planned Parenthood to the NOW,
takes an active stance on legalizing Marijuana on the same privacy and
control of body principles they hawk for abortion, the issue obviously is
NOT "CHOICE" in general. It is "choice" in a very narrow subject.

The translation of this is "pro-abortion," not "pro-choice." Choice means
choice all the way, not just in one issue.

And considering how badly pro-abortionists want to kill anencephalic babies
and starve clearly living patients like Christine Busalacchi (who has been
seen moving, responsive, and alert), to death, to make other people happy,
this "pro-abortion" quickly becomes "anti-life" or "pro-death."

Pro-life incurs a general principle of protecting human life. Well, we can
be faulted on the death penalty and war, but unlike the pro-aborts, we have
had to expand our realm - life overrules the right to kill anencephalic
infants, brain damaged daughters and so forth. Well, the pro-aborts have
expanded to - they want more legalized killing.

Even a fierce-meister like me, has to shiver at that. Excuse me while I go
figure out a way to blow the core out of the NOW - the sooner they go, the
sooner this "legalize more killing" tide will come to a screeching halt and
a refreshing reverse. The NOW crowd has helped start a tide of killing and
discrimination that already dwarfs anything we've seen before, in sheer
numbers, and which threatens to dwarf it many times over in intensity. If
the NOW has their way, they will decide who lives and who dies. Literally.
See Euthanasia, Baby Theresa, and Christine Busalacchi, for outstanding
examples.


You want to throw "anti-abortion," "anti-choice" and "fetus fanatics" words
around, pro-aborts? Well, look who is talking - the anti-life pots calling
the anti-choice kettles black.

=============================================================================
>##       "My logic is based on ... a religious perspective which says
>##  that personhood begins at birth (actually a month after birth if
>##  we want to be precise)..."
>##    -- Gloria Feldt,
>##       chief executive, Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona

>##   "I see nothing extreme or reprehensible about this statement."
>##     -- garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) <BtnDAw.Iwo.2@cs.cmu.edu>
=============================================================================
|Pro-Contraception   Pro-Freedom of Religion, Speech & Sexual Orientation   |
|Pro-Privacy    Pro-Humanism   Pro-Freedom of Choice 	Registered Democrat | 
|                                                                           |
|			Card-carrying member, NRLC                          |
|           Dedicated to achieving civil rights for the unborn              |
=============================================================================
BBBBBB     OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    Founder: Steve Chaney 
B    B     O      O   S         S          <chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu> 
BBBBBBBB   O     OO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    
BB     B   O     OO        SS        SS    Borg Operating 
BBBBBBBB O OOOOOOOO O SSSSSSS O SSSSSSS O  Space Systems, Revision 2.0 

	       The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS. 
Newsgroups: talk.abortion