HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Gregory R Block)
Subject: Re: '040 and SCSI
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 18:17:37 GMT

tw5232@albnyvms.bitnet (Teddy Wang) writes:
: Now this is a silly post!  First off, you can get a used 2000 for around $500

It's really not.  Here's why:

:At least a month ago you could get the RCS Fusion Forty for $995.  That's$1500
: for an '040 machine!  Add some 32bit ram and you'll be going 4 times faster
: than a standard 3000.  We're talking $2000 for a fully configured 17 MIPS
:computer! Well lets, see I've seen standard A3000/16 for around $2000 (used of
: course)!!!  About bus speeds, unless the amiga gets someone serious to enter
:the hardware seen (say someone comes out with a Zorro III SCSI-2 controller or
: something like that,) you're not going to need the bandwidth.  A good SCSI
: controller will operate at about 1 to 2 megs per second, which is about the
:maximum throughput of a fast SCSI drive (easily attainable with Zorro II and a
: '040.)  Yes if Zorro III had some good expansion development (like EISA is
:now,)it would be worth the money to buy a 3000, but I don't know how you could
:justify spending that kind of money on the 3000 - '040 but as it stands, Amiga
:just doesn't have those devices...

Yes, but there's another difference.  The board on the 030 machines
can generally make use of system ram at no difference to on-board ram.
And then there's CHIP memory.  Chip access on a 2000-040 is going to
be really bad.  Chip access on a 3000-040 isn't as bad.

And there are lots of peripherals and system expansions that one would
prefer a 3000 to have--If a 32-bit chipset ever comes out, it'll at
least be more likely that something would be able to "retrofit" it
onto an already 32-bit system rather than a 68000, 16-bit system.

Greg

--
(: (: (: (: Have you overdosed on smileys today?  Why NOT!?! :) :) :) :) :)
(:"The person who said size doesn't matter was probably a very small man":)
(:	gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu			Gregory R. Block         :)
(: (: (: (: (: (: (: (: (: (: (: (: (:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: smneyln@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov (Michael Neylon)
Subject: About to add a SyQuest....
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 22 Jul 1992 10:20 EST  

In two weeks I plan to order a SyQuest removable HD (40megs) from
Compubility.  I know I have to get the external kit (i have no 
power supply handy), but I just want to check a few things before I 
buy...
1) I have a 500, with a GVP hard drive.  I know the ad in CA says
that it is for a 2000, but it should work with my 500, right?

2) Does the kit come with the SCSI connection, ie, a wire that will attach to 
the back of my GVP when the SCSI port is locate?

TIA....

Mike Neylon          aka Masem the Great and Almighty Thermo GOD
  // Only the | Univ. of Toledo - Chemical Engineering - Senior
\X/   AMIGA!  |   NASA Lewis Research Center - Summer Intern
\_____________|_____smneyln@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov________________/
       -+ How do YOU spell 'potato'?  How about 'lousy'? +- 
      "Me and Spike are big Malcolm 10 supporters."-J.S.,PLCL
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: jyoung@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Young)
Subject: Atari Falcon  Re: Amiga 4000
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 92 20:15:42 GMT

In article <14posbINN47q@seven-up.East.Sun.COM> hans@castlerock.East.Sun.COM writes:
>
>	Can you give us some insights on the specs of this (Falcon) machine?
>
>

This is from French developer.  Now other developer said very FAST '040
is possible for very cheap price in Atari Falcon!!  Everyone will find
out very soon..  Falcon '030 will have A600 for competition but it
can go TWICE faster than A3000!

Other news from England said Falcons might have 16 million colors too!


>From: elendir@quasar.enst.fr (Vincent Habchi)
Keywords: Specifications from Atari
Organization: Telecom-Paris, France

Atari Falcon '030

 CPU : 68030 @ 16-33 MHz. (upgrade to 50 MHz)

 FPU optional (68882 @ 16-50 MHz).

 RAM : 1, 4 or 14 Mb, operating in page mode.

 (RAMcards: 512 Kb - 5 Mb)

 ROM : 512 Kb, plus 128 Ko in the cartridge port.

 DSP 56001 @ 32 MHz (?), 32 Kwords (96 Kb) of 0 wait state private RAM.

 DSP connector for modems, voice mail, direct-to-disk, JPEG/MPEG codecs, ...

 Expansion bus : 386 slot, DMA processor slot, optional processor socket.

 SVGA rez : 320x200, 640x480, 800x600 in 256 or 65536 colors amongst 262144.
 (upgrade to 1200x900)

 External video sync for genlocks, 15 bit video overlay mode for video titling.

 Programmable overscan.

 Hardware scrolling and BLITTER coprocessors.

 10 independants, 16 bit digital audio channels, up to 50 kHz sampling rate.

 Stereo 16 bit DMA output through a 1-bit DAC, 80 times oversampling.

 Stereo 8 bit DMA input.

 RASCAL (TM) and SDMA sound coprocessors.

 SCSI-2 port with internal DMA.

 LAN, RS 232C, Video, bi-directionnal parallel port suitable for scanners.

 MIDI in and out, jack connectors for sound.

 2 joystick ports, 2 enhanced digital/analog controller ports.

 1.44 Mb floppy, optionnal IDE Hard-disk, transfer rate 1 Mb/sec.


 MultiTOS (preemptive multitasking OS with memory protection, Unix system 
 call compatible with IPC pipes/shared memory/process spawning) included
 in ROM and floppy disk.  MultiTOS now allows easy porting of Unix
 programs.

 Lastly retail price of $700-900.
From: stimpsn@bbs.draco.bison.mb.ca (Gary Stimpson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: My power cable
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 06:29:00 GMT
Organization: The Draco Unix System, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Something's wrong with my power cable.  I have to move it around (where it 
connects to the computer) to get the computer to work properly.  I'll turn 
on my computer and it will take about 10 seconds for the insert disk screen 
to turn on.  Then the disk drive light goes on and there's NO clicking.  I 
just fiddle with the cable and then it works.  I've already been cut off 
this BBS twice because of the cable!  The computer dosen't reset though, it 
just hangs there and I can't do anything till I move around the cable.  
Could it be the cable, or maybe inside the computer (broken contact)?  I 
could go out and buy another power supply I suppose to see if this is the 
problem.
 
Gary

--
stimpsn@bbs.draco.bison.mb.ca (Gary Stimpson)
The Draco Unix System, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: keith@actrix.gen.nz (Keith Stewart)
Subject: Re: A600 HD SCSI or NOT The man speaks :-)?
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 04:53:40 GMT

In article <33693@cbmvax.commodore.com> mks@cbmvax.commodore.com (Michael Sinz) writes:
> sbiddle@aviate.welly.gen.nz (Steve Biddle) writes:
> >In article <1992Jul23.080500.9293@cenaath.cena.dgac.fr>,
> >	barre@cenaath.cena.dgac.fr (Roland BARRE) writes:
> >>
> >>Does someone know the type of hard drive than I can put in an A600 (pc ide ?)
> >>
> >>and the price of this hard drive ( 20 mega or 50 mega)?
> >
> >Well this may come as a surprise to many, but the A600 has just been released
> >over here in New Zealand and Australia, and is actually shipping with a 30meg
> >SCSI drive, rather than the IDE drive that was previously mentioned.
> >So basically any 2.5" SCSI drive should cause no problems.
> 
> Someone is trying to make one of your legs longer than the other.  ;^)
> 
> The A600 hardware *DOES NOT* come with SCSI and I know of no hardware available
> for it that makes it work with SCSI.  The internal hardware is IDE.  The
> internal drives are IDE.
> 

The leg puller in question ( not me!!!!) ran HDTOOLBOX on the A600HD and it
seems to scan the scsi bus and reported as if there was a normal SCSI drive
present.

What a greatsoftware programme that can turn an IDE into a SCSI :-)

Anyway the A600 is a real cute and sexy looking machine

> /----------------------------------------------------------------------\
> |      /// Michael Sinz  -  Senior Amiga Systems Engineer              |
> |     ///                   Operating System Development Group         |
> |    ///   BIX:  msinz      UUNET:  mks@cbmvax.commodore.com           |
> |\\\///                                                                |
> | \XX/     Quantum Physics:  The Dreams that Stuff is made of.         |
> \----------------------------------------------------------------------/

Keith
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.audio
From: mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst)
Subject: Re: Audio CD to digital data?
Organization: Max-Planck-Institut f"ur Radioastronomie
Distribution: comp
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 09:46:53 GMT

In <1992Jul23.203836.17323@jato.jpl.nasa.gov> jdickson@jato.jpl.nasa.gov (Jeff Dickson) writes:
>Couldn't the CD audio be redigitized with some kind of on board digitizer?

You don't need an 'on board digitizer', any sound sampler will do. However,
you always get a degradation in quality. And 16-bit (or better 18-bit or 20-bit)
digitizers are expensive.

Regards,
-- 
Michael van Elst
UUCP:     universe!local-cluster!milky-way!sol!earth!uunet!unido!mpirbn!p554mve
Internet: p554mve@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
From: Todd_Petit@agwbbs.new-orleans.LA.US (Todd Petit)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Amiga 4000/Atari Falcon
Distribution: world
Date: 26 Jul 92 14:39:04 CST
Organization: The Amiga GateWay BBS * New Orleans, La.

In a message dated Sun 26 Jul 92  2:18, Leavitt@cheshire.oxy.edu (thomas Va
wrote:

 LV> It seems to me that the Falcon is a mid-range machine... hitting the
 LV> Amiga line where it is weakest, and the Mac line where they are
 LV> weakest,
 LV> and contributing features which cost far more in IBMs, when assembled
 LV> 
 LV> together in the aftermarket.

 LV> It needs applications written to take advantage of it's unique
 LV> capabilities.

 LV> Thom

I can't believe that anyone would think that the Falcon is in any way a
threat to the Mac or the Amiga for that matter. If you think C= has
marketing problems, take a good hard look at Atari! The Falcon is not
unique enough to garner any interest in the general market--no one will pay
any attention to it.



-- Via DLG Pro v0.992

From: todd_petit@agwbbs.new-orleans.LA.US
From: jheath@CERIS.Purdue.EDU (Jim Heath)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Value of a signature A1000?
Date: 31 Jul 92 14:07:02 GMT
Organization: Center for Environmental and Regulatory Information Systems, Purdue University

From article <1992Jul30.195540.9947@cheshire.oxy.edu>, by leavitt@cheshire.oxy.edu (Thomas VanNess Leavitt):
> Hmm... how much would this be worth?
>

Didn't all 1000s have these signatures?

BTW, does anyone have the list of "tricks" for showing the
various hidden names in the Amiga roms? 
-- 
"Land of song, said the warrior bard,           Jim Heath
Though all the world betrays thee.
One sword, at least, thy rights shall guard, (The Minstrel Boy)
One faithful harp will praise thee."         (Thomas Moore)
From: rovero@oc.nps.navy.mil (Josh Rovero)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Adding extra HD to A3000 (missing cable ???)
Date: 23 Jul 92 17:08:43 GMT
Organization: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA

You need to purchase either a 50-pin ribbon extension cable that will go
from the current cable to the new drive, or do like I did -- just buy
a ribbon cable designed for two drives.  Most computer stores that have
any SCSI stuff will have either.....

-- 
Josh Rovero   (rovero@oc.nps.navy.mil) | or Internet 5346p@cc.nps.navy.mil 
Department of Oceanography, Code OC/Rv |      Bitnet 5346p@NAVPGS 
Naval Postgraduate School              |              
Monterey, CA  93943   (408) 646-2084   |
Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.hardware:13133 comp.sys.amiga.audio:2937
From: ridder@zso.dec.com (Hans Ridder)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.audio
Subject: Re: Audio CD to digital data?
Date: 23 Jul 92 18:13:30 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation - DECwest Engineering
Originator: ridder@zowie.zso.dec.com

In article <1992Jul22.123104.13905@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> et5j@vax5.cit.cornell.edu (Mario Giannella) writes:
>Are there any hardware/software packages to allow one to put an audio
>Compact Disc into a CD-ROM drive, and get a direct digital data file?

CDROM drives (apparenly all of them) will *not* allow you to read the
data bits from an audio track, unless the "copying allowed" bit is set
in the Table of Contents (TOC) on the CD.  I've never heard of any audio
CD with this bit set.

This is merely a matter of the CDROM drive makers doing what the music
industry wants.  Money talks.

-hans
-- 
  Hans-Gabriel Ridder				Digital DECwest Engineering
  ridder@rust.zso.dec.com			Bellevue, Washington, USA
  {pacbell,pyramid,uunet}!rust.zso.dec.com!ridder
From: bmccnnll@unix1.tcd.ie (Barry McConnell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: GVP G_Force Boards
Date: 27 Jul 92 23:24:02 GMT
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin

In <1992Jul27.150704.13835@CERIS.Purdue.EDU> jheath@CERIS.Purdue.EDU (Jim Heath) writes:

>I don't have one of these cards yet, but most people who do say
>that they never (almost?) use 68000 mode.  Under what
>circumstances would one want to use 68000 mode? 

Games, or the occasional demo. Most of which end up getting run off floppy.
(You don't waste valuable HD space on badly-written 68000-only programs, do
you?)

I would never try to use my normal system in 68000 fallback mode. It's just
too slow. It takes twice as long to boot from HD than it does in '030 mode,
and windows move 5 to 8 times slower, which is quite frankly - unbearable!

Barry.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: burkert1@platon.fmi.uni-passau.de (Klaus Burkert)
Subject: Re: A600 HD ?
Organization: University of Passau, W-Germany
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 22:26:23 GMT

In article <1992Jul30.100213.998@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de> mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst) writes:
>In <1992Jul29.205736.18188@ulowell.ulowell.edu> mmoore@cs.ulowell.edu (Michael P. Moore) writes:
>
>>>  I (mlelstv) wrote:
>>>No Zorro.. (the A500 hadn't a Zorro slot either). You will find more
>>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>>The A500 and A1000 both have a zorro slot.  According to the a500/a2000 tech
>>manual, the slot on the side of the a500 and the a1000 are Zorro I slots
>>That's why the a2000 has Zorro II slots and the a3000 has Zorro III.
>
>Dunno what is in you tech manual. But Zorro-I was a 100 pin bus most
>identical to Zorro-II. If I remember right it didn't have the coprocessor
>slot specs and it did use a quite different form factor. One of the
>first expansions (the Turbo A1000 from CSA ?) did use a Zorro-I expansion
>box.

The a500/a2000 tech manual describes building a Zorro(I) backplane and how
to wire it towards the A500 (not sure about the latter).
This backplane-stuff is implemented on the A2000/3000's motherboard and
extended to ZorroII or III respectively.

Ciao, Klaus.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Klaus Burkert        email: burkert1@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de
Brandweg 11          voice: +49-851/83993 (only pm please)
D-W-8390 Passau   /  Federal Republic of Germany
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: johnf@uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu (John Flanagan)
Subject: Re: Intrested in some info
Organization: University of Hawaii, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 00:28:30 GMT

In article <Metin_Savignano.02t2@turttwo.tynet.sub.org> Metin_Savignano@turttwo.tynet.sub.org (Metin Savignano) writes:
>
>When I decided to switch from PAL to NTSC because of the flickering, I used
>a little PD prog that made the job for me. It's called SetDefaultMonitor
>and kind of simulates the hardware solution. 

Can't you just drag the PAL (or NTSC) monitor icon into sys:Monitors,
and use sys:preferences/ScreenMode for this purpose?  Or are you not
running 2.04?

--John
-- 
John Flanagan                          ||
johnf@uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu           ||"Don't worry, honey, 
U. of Hawaii, Dept. of Physics & Astro.|| our skirts are clean."
2505 Correa Rd., Honolulu, HI 96822    ||
From: daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: What is the Amiga 4000?
Date: 27 Jul 92 22:32:13 GMT
Reply-To: daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie)
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA

In article <1992Jul26.232213.3546@arizona.edu> CBLACK@hacks.arizona.edu (harlie B	) writes:

>But I would like to know if they, Commodore, put the following into it 
>[hypothetical succesor to the A3000]:
> 
>          A better hard drive interface, 

The A3000 has the fastest motherboard-based hard disk interface of any 
personal computer out there (you can get somewhat faster SCSI boards for
MCA or EISA if you have some cash to burn).  Using the Maxtor Magic drive,
it clocked it with 4.2MB/s though the scsi.device and 3.9MB/s though the
filesystem (as I recall -- correct me if I'm off, disk people).  That's
fast enough to have it mentioned in their literature.

>       Also if they got rid of the 8 bit (I am not shure if the angus, Denise, 
>       and/or paula are what I am thinking of) chip set.  

I have absolutely no idea what you're thinking of.  Agnus, Denise, and Paula
are 16-bit chips through and though.  What you probably want is some 32-bit
Amiga chips.  Bus widths are an implementation detail, anyway.  You should be
more concerned with what it does -- there's no inherent functional difference 
between a 32-bit system at bus speed N and a 16-bit system at bus speed 2*N.
The choice of implementation is mainly one of cost.
-- 
Dave Haynie Commodore-Amiga (Amiga 3000) "The Crew That Never Rests"
   {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!daveh      BIX: hazy
	"Work like a horse, drink like a fish"	- Psychefunkapus
 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: orre@thalamus.sans.kth.se (Roland Orre)
Subject: Re: 68040 and AMAX
Reply-To: orre@nada.kth.se (Roland Orre)
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 13:10:50 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.120622.16366@doug.cae.wisc.edu> 
pochanay@cae.wisc.edu (Adisak Pochanayon) writes:
>    Quicky question.  I have a Fusion Forty 68040.
>    Is Amax II compatible with it??

I have a Fusion Forty 68040 board from RCS Managment and AMaxII runs
fine on it, but you can't use less than AMaxII 2.5.  The problem is
merely that not all MacIntosh programs runs very well on 68040, but
most do. This problem is of course the same on the Mac Quadra.

I do have a more significant problem with the Macintosh emulation,
however.  I have recently installed 7.01 (half an hour ago) which is
said to be the first Mac system that manages the 68040. This system
does, however, still not handle the 68882 emulation correctly. As soon
as I run a program that uses the FPU the program crashes on "Bad
F-Line Instruction". I have also installed the Macsystem for the
Quadra explicitly. It does handle the copy- back mode correctly so
that's ok. I mean the system seem to be aware of running on a 68040.
It may still be so that the floating point exceptions are handled by
the Quadra PROMs.  This is of course a simple problem to solve, the
problem is that I don't like the Mac that much that I want to learn
how to program it and add this exception handling myself (Amiga is
best).

Somebody must have done it already. I mean there are a lot of 68040
accelerator boards for the Mac available out there and it must have
been solved for these. I have asked on the comp.sys.mac.programmer
earlier but the only answer I got was that I have to have system 7.01.
Now I have that but I still have the FPU problem.

I will continue my investigation of this problem and tell you all when
it is solved.
--------------------------------+----------------------+-----------------------
Roland Orre                     | O---O---O Studies of |       orre@nada.kth.se
Dept. of Computing Science      |  \ /|\ /| Artificial | orre%nada@sekth.bitnet
Royal Institute of Technology   |   O-O-O-O Neural     |
SANS, NADA, KTH                 |   |/ \ /| Systems    |  Phone: +46 8 790 6900
S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden      |   O---O-O            |    Fax: +46 8 790 0930
--------------------------------+----------------------+-----------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: jfieber@sophia.smith.edu (John Fieber)
Subject: Re: @$#^@$%# 2.04!
Organization: Smith College
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 20:36:29 GMT

In article <30JUL199213302905@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov> smneyln@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov (Michael Neylon) writes:
>>2.04 and that this is not illegal to do.)  I've also installed ROM
>>cards in a couple of 1000's.  THey're pretty cheap, and relatively
>>easy to put in.
>
>Thank god for sockets!  Imagine trying to replace the motherboard!

There is no problem upgrading a 1000 to use the 2.04 rom, you
just need one of those little daughter boards to stick the new
rom on.  I think the common *perception* that the 1000 is not
upgradeable simply due to the fact that Commodore does not happen
to make the little board.  I realize the 1000, being the
`prototype', would be considerable headache for Commodore to
support fully, I'm not so sure completely dropping support is
wize either.

Instead, if Commodore had offered a 1000 upgrade kit with a
disclaimer saying ther could not guarantee everything to work
properly then many perope would be much happier.  1000 owners are
a dedicated and adventurous group that kept the Amiga alive and
growing.  They are most certainly not pansies and could deal with
a disclaimer in exchange for not being "forgotten".

>IBM machine, but I will never give up on my Amiga.  It has and will serve
>me well. Now if we can only get C= off their butts and make them advertise..

I think we need some more specific terminology for referring to
Commodore.  Something like:

C=   for Commodore in general
C=M  for Commodore management
C=E  for Commodore engineers

Most complaints I hear about C= are actually about C=M.  I think
C=E is doing a pretty good job.

>As for software, there is no need for 'standard' (software that doesnt
>mess with the actual system) software to be system dependant.  It should
>be able to use libraries of both systems equally well...

Uh, the problem is that most of the libraries in 2.0 have a *lot*
of *extremely* useful features designed for the use of these so
called `standard' applications (BOOPSI for example) that simply
don't exist in the 1.3 versions of those libraries.  And then there
the entirely new libraries in 2.0 such as gadtools and asl which
were clearly designed with `standard' software in mind.

The size of the rom doubled from 1.3 to 2.0 for a reason - to make
high quality and consistant `standard' applications easy to program.
Of course, it also makes bizarre non-standard apps much easier
as well, but that is beside the point.

Also, I don't want *any* software that messes with the system.  I
want software that uses the system to accomplish something useful.

-john


-- 
===jfieber@sophia.smith.edu==================================================
From: kensaga@diku.dk (Kenneth Fribert)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: PLEASE HELP WITH ARCNET CARD
Date: 28 Jul 92 10:34:45 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, U of Copenhagen


I talked to a guy some time ago about some ArcNet cards, at the moment I did
not know of software for the system, and so I was not really interested. Now
I have found it and I really need to find the guy again, if you have an
address or phonenumber or something like that, please EMail me.

Best regards
-- 
|/                 Fido-net: 2:230/41.14    Phonenet: (+45) 31 743 455
|\enneth  Fribert  Snailnet: Nedertoften 39, 1tv,  Dk-2720 Vanloese, Denmark
System currently in use: Amiga 2000, GVP Series II, Quantum 105S, SupraFax v32b
                         10 mb ram, MultiVision2000