From: pnr0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (PAUL N. RITTER)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: HERE IT IS! (from ..YOU ARE CLUELESS...) 1 OF 3
Date: 21 Dec 92 04:26:51 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1992Dec20.063712.46791@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, pnr0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (P
AUL N. RITTER) writes:
>Well I was wrong. I made 3 posts. The first dates 10/27/92...
>
>Here is the question...
>   If character doesn't matter, why isn't Ted Kennedy president today?
>The answer- He probable could be since honesty, integrety, and values don't
>matter anymore to the general public.
>Examples- Marian Barry, former Mayor of D.C., a convicted drug user, a felon
>elected to city council; Carol mosely Brown (Ill), a welfare cheat; Barbara
>Boxer (D-Ca), severe check bouncer running for Senate.
>   It's obvious many Americans trust adulterers, draft dodgers, liars and
>cheats. When political and religious leaders applaud these behaviors and
>further them by silence, we are subtly being told this is the right way to
>live. We no longer need to feel guilty since we're following our "leaders."
>   When Clinton "lays off" the majority of military personel, 2 things will
>occur; Thousands will be unemployed defense workers. If a military conflict
>arises, the draft will have to be reinstated to rebuild the armed forces.
>1. How many parents of 17+yr old children will welcome a man, who not only
>dodged the draft, but demonstrated against his own country on COMMUNIST SOIL?
>Will you allow this man to send your children off to battle? Mine would NOT
>serve a dishonorable man in a country without moral values.
>2. How many parents are considering the fact that young women could be
>included in the draft? Equal rights, ya' know.
>3. How many people know the status of the State of Arkansas? It ranks 45th to
>50th in EVERY CRUCIAL AREA of the 50 States!!Things such as worker safety,
>education, fair housing, civil rights and salaries.
>4. The average salary of Arkansans, according to the World Almanac 1992,
>$17,418 (1989) and $18,204 (1990)
>5. How can anyone the constant accusations by the Clinton/Gore Campaign about
>Iran/Iraq Gate, when after spending $40 MILLION in taxpayer funds to
>investigate the president and NO PROOF has been brought foreward to discredit
>him? On the other hand, accusations of draft dodging, infidelity, and
>organizing demonstrations against his country on foreign soil have been lodged
>against Clinton and have been DOCUMENTED! IGNORED, except for a breif instant,
>by the press.
>6. Clinton's "INVESTMENT PLAN"- a 1992 version of WPA, building roads,
>bridges, airports, etc., under gov't regulations which will most likely force
>workers to accept minimum wages, rather than the higher wages found in the
>private sector. The Democrat party has always been known as the patronage
>party, will this apply to contractors who have given money to the party?
>TO PEROT SUPPORTERS-
>1. Doesn't it bother you that he's a quitter, a conspiracy freak, a man who
>investigates people (including his OWN children and tried to lie about it)?
>Who would be next on his list? If I were a volunteer I'd worry. Some do!
>2. It's amazing that those who hate the rich are embracing one of the richest
>men in America who pays LESS PERCENT in taxes than the rest of us. Is it then
>the contention that only the rich can be president because they can fund their
>own campaign?
>
>   Sorry people, my fingers were cramping. Save this and I'll complete it
>later.
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.sex