HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: To be fired for a pregnancy.
Date: 24 Jan 93 16:13:31 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan24.095946.12560@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>I wrote:

>>THERE ARE *MANY* WOMEN THAT DECIDE TO HAVE NOT CHILDREN 
>>BECAUSE THEY ARE *AFRAID* TO *LOOSE* THEIR JOB!!!!!!!!
> 
> VERY GOOD, MICHELE!!!  FOR THE FIRST TIME YOU ARE RIGHT. There *are*
> many women who would lose their jobs if they got pregnant!  And if
> they want to keep their job, I think that they should realise that.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^******^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> And if they don't want to lose their job, and don't feel bad about
> sacrificing childbirth, then they should just go ahead and keep their
> jobs and not get pregnant IF THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT.
> 

OK. I am sure that you flamed yourself. Maybe I am wrong, 
but what you wrote is for me very cold and *sexist*. I am 
not the one that have to judge. Now I ask to the women what 
they think, because I am tired to deal with a guy that write 
such a bullshit.

	Michele
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Subject: Re: Fucking stooge
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 07:15:33 GMT
Organization: Flame League for Anti-Piracy (F.L.A.P)

ah568@po.cwru.edu writes:
>BTW, found this on alt.flame. Seems to be an appropriate suggestion for
>all to many people around here..
>
>...
>nO, you should try Rob's sure-fire method:  get yourself a big dawg, smear
>raw chicken liver all over your misshapen genitals and settle back for a
>nice lick job.
>...
>
>
>-- 
>Dan Brown
>ah568@po.cwru.edu
>Flame SIG. SIGop.
>The facts say nothing, the opinions blather aimlessly.


[blushing]            

Well, it's not my *best* work, but... 
thanks for stealing it unattributed anyway.

-- Andy
From: patrick@rio-grande.is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: THE REAGAN ERA IS OVER, THE END IS NEAR!
Date: 27 Jan 93 04:11:22 GMT
	<C1G2GJ.HKH.1@cs.cmu.edu> <1993Jan27.015304.4811@ncsu.edu>
Followup-To: alt.flame
Distribution: usa
Organization: TSAKC Local 919-515

On Wed, 27 Jan 1993 01:53:04 GMT, dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) said:

>In article <C1G2GJ.HKH.1@cs.cmu.edu> 
>garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) re-posts my alt.flame article
>to talk.abortion, and then writes in alt.rush-limbaugh:

>"Doug Holtsinger is obsessed with following me from group to group,
>flaming each post."

><C1HCvB.AxJ.1@cs.cmu.edu> 
>garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) 

So do you have a point, or are you just whining as usual?

--PLH, been there, seen that, got the trophy for the last bozo that tried it

--
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: John G. Robinson <robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: A Day in the life of: Rob Dobson
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:24:12 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.195134.6475@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> Mark
B.,  writes:
>>>-- 
>>>   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
>>>  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     Professor
>>Kevin Walsh
>>> _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/     
>>kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
>>>_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/      
>>kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
>>
>>Nice .sig, prof.
>
>
>Actually, he stole it from this enlightened person...

No doubt you're "informed" and "edified", as well.

>
>        __/__/__/__/  __/__/__/__/ __/__/__/__/
>       __/                 __/    __/
>      __/   __/__/        __/    __/   __/__/
>     __/      __/  __/   __/    __/      __/
>    __/__/__/__/  __/__/__/    __/__/__/__/
>   Hay, d00dz!  Write my sysop!  He loves email!
>                gjg2001@andy.bgsu.edu

Dickweed.

**********
John G. Robinson
robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: jason is boring
Date: 26 Jan 93 11:26:07 +0000
Organization: None
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan26.014641.14877@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
> In article <1993Jan25.112500.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>>
>>That's the definition. I was speaking about the meaning. 

> HAHAHAHA!!! That's really good, Michele.  Why not carry a neon sign around
> with you that reads: "Look at me, I'm as ignorant as can be!"  Let me know
> when you grasp the concept of synonyms.  Maybe it'll be in your next
> "English for Limp Losers" class. 

Idiot! When I said that you don't *know* the *meaning* of the 
word "proof", I said that you are *UNABLE* to understand its 
definition! Even a computer program can give me the 
definition of the word, BUT IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE 
PROGRAM KNOWS THE MEANING!!! Can you understand this?!?

You are a Third Class Cretin (the lowest class, the worst).

[Jason crap deleted because he is boring]

> Well, now you have brought the wrath of all Britiah residents of alt.flame,

AH! You think that few little brit scums scare me. I already 
started to tease the brits togheter with Moana. I came here 
the first day speking bad about the brit fags. And now, you 
the Third Class Cretin, tell me to care of the brits. Puah! 

> I'm afraid.  They will be on you like carrion birds on the dead carcass I 
> have left of you.

You know, jason? You have problems. You belive on the crap 
that you think. You are a loser, remember. You *claim* to win, 
when you are losing. Two guys came out to tell *you* that 
you were writing crap. And you pretend to win. You LOST!

	Michele

PS  You are boring. To deal with you is boring. You change 
    the posts oh the others, you lie. I don't like you,
    FUCK YOURSELF!
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Par, Par.
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 18:09:44 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.155232.17912@tdb.uu.se>, t89par@tdb.uu.se (Par Svensson) writes:

> Hmmm, the "no, that flame goes for *you*"-copying-style. Could it be "The Phantom"
> who's back...?

Hmm... nothing original, only leeching off of other flames and finding
something that Par, in his infinite wisdom, believes to be wrong. Shall we
title this the k e N approach... nah. This is distinctly Par.

"We were hardly bereft when Par-Zero left, ortherwise, the Chorus was
enchanting"

--The Phantom
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Sunbird a la 400ci)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Michele is getting serious [was: Macho-women flame]
Date: 25 Jan 93 01:00:23 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <35739@olympus.wustl.edu> moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:

>VIOLENT! Go and fight, Don Quichote (sp?)!

It's Quixote


 -----------Visit the SOUNDING BOARD BBS 214-596-2915, a Wildcat! BBS--------
 ObQuotes:
 "Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand..."
 "Ignorance and prejudice, and fear go hand-in-hand..."

    Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 22:54:32 GMT
Subject: Tony Frolicks Liz's Dog
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: alt.flame

>I'm sorry, I didn't realize that we are supposed to flame ourselves in this
 
 You *moron*. You don't apologize to *anyone* for *anything* on alt.flame.
 
>Yes, you are correct, michele, you are one boring motherfucker.

I may be boring, moron. But you are worse because you cannot *flame me*.
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!?!?!?!?!  Little frou-frou.

>alt.lame.flame shit is starting to get to me.

Listen, little Afro-boy.  Why don't you go back to your home. You 
are soooo *boring*.  I am glad I am getting to you. I would like also
to get to your mother or daughter. They were *very* good the last time,
belive me on *that*!!!

> Are you trying to be nice?

Puah! Nice to you? You piece of *SHIT*!?!?!?!  Shit is for flushing
in the *toilet* asshole.

>Here's hoping you get a clue,

And here's hoping you get *aids* you fag!  Puah! 
Are you the same Tony that has been imitating ~The Great Name?
If so, you are not able to deal with me, young fag!
He he he he he!?!?!?! Sorry, you lose, you *moron*

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!?!?!?!?!?!

Now go home *moron*! Bwaaaaaaaahhhhhh!
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: blow me
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:21:18 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <24814@hacgate.SCG.HAC.COM>, sperdomo@samson.hac.com (Sanin Perdomo) writes: 
> Hey fuckface, don't put down the Marines!  You're just mad because they 
>wouldn't let you in.  I believe you have both a pussy and a pindick (no balls 
>of course), therefore, mutants are not allowed in.
>
They let you in, Didn't they?
 
>> ability? or better yet, why don't you join ROTC, so you can cuddle up with
>> your academic equal, Private Witty? 
> 
> You might have a point here.

I can't believe how ignorant you are leatherneck! We are on the same side
gloryhound? Or don't you believe in Unity? By the way, asshole Rob mistakenly
posted "Private" its CADET now. 
> 
>> Hugs,
> (A pussy closing for a big pussy)

Hmmmm? You want his body don't you? Of course you do.
> 
>> Dan "dickbreath"
> 
> -cosmic

JEFF WITTY
*ARMY* R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: THE WOMEN-MACHO FLAME IS STILL BURNING.
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:51:00 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.121344.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:

> FUCK YOU, MAN! OK, you guys wanted this! NOW I AM REALLY *ANGRY*.
> I STARTED WITH BULLSHIT, AND MANY GUYS WERE COMPLAINING ABOUT 
> THE FACT THAT I WAS TOO MUCH *RUDE* WITH WOMEN. And I was 
> rude. So I thought that I was really going to hurt somebody 
> with my flames, in a *BAD* way. AND I DID NOT LIKE THAT. OK?
> BUT, since somebody else like you, is trying to hurt me 
> telling me that I can not deal with fire, I STOP TO BE 
> SERIOUS OR WHAT THE FUCK YOU THINK, AND

This is hilarious!! There must be pasta sauce ALL over this mans walls!!!
 
> I WILL PUT ON NET THE WORST RUDE, BRUTAL, DRIVELS ABOUT 

Drivel? Yes. I'm glad you finally understand what that word means.

> You can think the fuck that you want, I do not have any 
> problem. Deal with it, instead to cry about how much FIRE I 
> PUT ON THE NET, OK?!?!?

Ok, we've got JORN the Captain Cave man of the Net, and Michele the Dragon of
the Net... Michelle, you're into the metaphoric dimensions of the word "flame"
a little too much there big guy...

> I know your game, guys. I want me to *admit* that what I 
> write about women is what I think. NO WAY, LOSERS!

WHOOOOOAAA!!! Michele!!! What the fuck did you just try to say!?! You claim (I
think) that they want you to admit that, from what you write, it worked. Does
the phrase Jedi Mind-Trick mean anything to you?
 
> Here I gave a challenge to you guys. Just try to close me in 
> a way that I will admit it, IF YOU CAN!

You just did, all by yourself.
 
> Or, you are afraid to burn yourself?

Sizzle. Sizzle. *yawn*


--The Phantom
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 16:30:33 GMT
Subject: Re: J o r n  picked up by trawler
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: alt.flame

J o r n   writes:

It's always nice seeing alt.flamer's spending so much time
writing about another fellow.Actually, it only took me a couple of minutes du




	Another fellow....oh, shit.. another technical mistake..
	I thought J o r n was a female's name. 

	Sorry, J o r n.

	Next AP article will be better edited.
From: moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Michele is getting serious [was: Macho-women flame]
Date: 23 Jan 93 08:03:58 GMT
Organization: Washington University,  St Louis MO

Michele *finally* explodes:
>
>FUCK YOU, MAN! OK, you guys wanted this! NOW I AM REALLY *ANGRY*.
>I STARTED WITH BULLSHIT, AND MANY GUYS WERE COMPLAINING ABOUT 
>THE FACT THAT I WAS TOO MUCH *RUDE* WITH WOMEN. And I was 
>rude. So I thought that I was really going to hurt somebody 
>with my flames, in a *BAD* way. AND I DID NOT LIKE THAT. OK?
>BUT, since somebody else like you, is trying to hurt me 
>telling me that I can not deal with fire, I STOP TO BE 
>SERIOUS OR WHAT THE FUCK YOU THINK, AND
>
>I WILL PUT ON NET THE WORST RUDE, BRUTAL, DRIVELS ABOUT 
>WOMEN THAT YOU EVER SAW/READ ON YOUR LIFE. I just started 
>that. And if I hurt somebody, it will be your fault.
>So that.

Geeeez! Here he is: Michele Dall'Agata, the Charlie Chaplin of the net!
Yes, Michele, you figured it out, finally! We want you RUDE, BRUTAL,
VIOLENT! Go and fight, Don Quichote (sp?)!
Gosh, I'm so excited, and I don't have to pay anything for the show ....

By the way, could you please give me an anticipation of your future
powerful drivels? I'm so scared for the possibility that my shaky 
news feeder loses some episode, really! 


>P.S.	Puah, and maybe you think to be a flamer. Such a 
>	loser.
Ipse dixit... you are really an endless source of fun, Michele!
Go on with the good job: we appreciate it!

Moana.

PS: nice Caps-Lock. Which is the model of your keyboard? Did you
buy it second-hand from your intimate friend JS??

PPS: JUST A TIP: For a future dramatic end of sentence, instead of using 
'so that' I suggest you to use 'Period'. It's so brutal ... [I'm desperately
trying to use it for some ending of one of my flames, but I've never found 
the right occasion - but you will find it, for sure, in your future rude-show]
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 19:21:30 GMT
Subject: Re: Mel, theme songs, the Beverly Hillbillys, and Mel's prose
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: alt.flame

One of the better ones!  ha ha ha 

good one andy.
From: Cannam@sc.ZIB-Berlin.de (Chris Cannam)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Hamper: Spaghetti-O's!!!!
Date: 28 Jan 93 11:48:23
Organization: Konrad Zuse Zentrum fuer Informationstechnik Berlin
Distribution: alt
	<C1J6qw.67B@cs.psu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: borodin.zib-berlin.de
In-reply-to: krobinso@gold.crayola.cs.psu.edu's message of Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:08:56 GMT


In article <C1J6qw.67B@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@gold.crayola.cs.psu.edu
(Kenneth J Robinson) writes:

   In article <CANNAM.93Jan27111846@borodin.sc.ZIB-Berlin.de>
   Cannam@sc.ZIB-Berlin.de (Chris Cannam) writes:
   >
   >Oh, praise the Lord I'm sure.

   You have made an error, for I am not the Lord, I am k e N.

With a whole exciting new capitalization scheme as well, it would
appear.  However are you going to maintain your moral and righteous
attitude if you go and flirt with tantalisingly exciting new
directions in such a casual fashion?

   k e N   R o B i N s o N

Besides, it looks like shit.

--
           on sighting mathematicians it should unhook the algebra from their
             minds and replace it with poetry;  on sighting poets it should
               unhook poetry from their minds and replace it with algebra
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Blinded by love; Jism and J S Graley
Date: 22 Jan 1993 17:10:21 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <1993Jan21.153809.13909@bsu-ucs> 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
|In article <1993Jan21.095310.6796@ericsson.se>, etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim) writes:
|
|[Jim's semen deleted]
|
|> Do you base your decision on who is "Euro-scum" solely upon where they work?
|> I work in the UK (Sussex, to be precise) and I may or may not be British. It
|> doesn't matter and I don't care but what makes *you* so sure I'm a Brit?
|> 
|No. I do not base my "Euro-scum" label on where they work. "Euro-scum" is
|a group of radical, pro-nazi idealists. For instance; Graley continually
|flames America and it's people, they are not one of him so he thinks
|they should be destroyed. I have repeatedly posted that, as to date, Graley
|is the only Britian who deserves my flames. I do not intend it on all
|people of Britiany, why can't you see that? I know why. You have been 
|blinded by thier opinions. You don't see that they are insulting you too.
|Unless you think people like him are a reflection of Britian. You haven't
|been here on the net long enough to understand our flame war. Take time,
|sit back and use your mind, sort thinks out, ask questions. Otherwise
|continue your blind rectum slime sucking. 

Hey SHIT-FUCKKY, youre just a slimy arsehole trying to get out of the shit 
you dumped yourself in by flaming your superiours - the BRITISH.

You just don't realise, Great Britain is SIMPLY BETTER than America. Your
stupid dumb shit postings are testimony to this.

I suggest the least embarissing thing for you to do is SHUT THE FUCK UP
and PISS OFF.

~THE GREAT NAME
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: ProLife, ProMurder, ProCrime And Iraq
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 23:37:21 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.191054.25150@research.nj.nec.com>, haushalt@research.nj.nec.com (Robert C.Haushalter) writes:

> Phantom:  before I ask you if you think our founding fathers and jesus were 
> liberals or conservatives I'd like to get some important information from 
> you republicans.

1) I am not religious. WHOOOOOAAA!!! Imagine that! That now makes half of your
blather moot.
 
>  These are the real family values of republicans.

By defining Republican family values, you have discredited your arguement. Good
job! Where do I espouce the family value arguement?
 
> Perhaps you could also tell me about the Jim Bakker/Jerry Falwell/Pat 
> Robertson crowd:

Sure. They are extremists. The majority of Republicans do not identify with
them, its just that they are more vocal. Any extreme position is pointless in
politics as it... extreme. I think you could have answered a lot of your own
questions if you could understand innuendo. I attacked the extreme liberals in
my original posting, if you care to read it again. Sound out the words, and
then look up those nasty two syllable words. It's hard, I realize.

--The Phantom
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: patrick@rio-grande.is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: THE REAGAN ERA IS OVER, THE END IS NEAR!
Organization: Some place Doug couldn't find with a map.
	<1993Jan21.003840.13886@bsu-ucs> <gerald.727642733@gerald>
	<1993Jan24.193355.16736@ncsu.edu>
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 23:08:08 GMT

On 24 Jan 93 19:33:55 GMT, dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) said:

>In article <gerald.727642733@gerald> 
>gerald@torolab4.vnet.ibm.com writes:
>>01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:

>>> JEFF WITTY
>>> ARMY R.O.T.C.
>>> a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY

>> I"M SURE THE U>S> ARMY COULDN"T BE PROUDER TO HAVE YOU ABOARD< JEFFY.

>Fuck off, you pretentious sniveling little asshole.  You had 
>better be damn glad that there are people who are willing to 
>put their life on the line for pompous little shits like you.
>No wonder IBM is losing so much money -- they've got too many
>snotty cock-sucking Canadians spending their time posting to the
>net.  Why don't you start pulling your weight and stop jizzing 
>on the net before they fire your lazy Canadian ass? 

Hey, Rev -- maybe if you devoted some of your time to actually doing classwork,
you might get out of State sooner, eh?  Of course, then you wouldn't have your
free pulpit from which to disseminate your "truth".  (I see you've adopted a 
few attitudes of your pal T*d KKKaldis, too.  I just can't express how proud 
*I* am to have to share the same country with you, I know that much...)

--PLH, would the Reverend *lie*?  Only on days that end in "y", maybe...
--

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Michelina...man or black hole? 
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 01:16:50 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.112607.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>Inven article <1993Jan26.014641.14877@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan25.112500.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>Even a computer program can give me the 
>definition of the word, BUT IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE 
>PROGRAM KNOWS THE MEANING!!! Can you understand this?!?
Let's put it this way, I know the meaning, fuckface.  This has little stock 
coming from a the fool who doesn't knwo what "drivel" is, though you are
quite fluent in it.

>You know, jason? You have problems.
Let's see...I'm not the rapist, am I?  I'm not the one who respects assholes
and losers?  Nope, not me.  I'm not the one preaching human subjugation, true? 
Yep, it's not me.  I'm not the one who sodomises his clientele for money, am I?
Why no, I'm not.  I'll just leave that to you, Michelina.

>PS  You are boring. To deal with you is boring. You change 
>    the posts oh the others, you lie. I don't like you,
>    FUCK YOURSELF!

Heavens to Betsy!  Michelina doesn't like me!  Heaven forfend...
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim)
Subject: Re: Beer, me Mason!
 
Reply-To: etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se
Organization: Ericsson
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 11:43:50 GMT

In article 53D@cmptrc.lonestar.org, andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>
>Yeah, and with Graley it's usually just the single word "FUCK"
>repeated over and over and over and over and over and over and over.
>
>-- Andy


You mean you're *not* impressed by Graley's "FUCK" prowess?

Don't forget that Graley has to resort to verbal fucking because his
flacid, useless prick has never risen above half-mast.  It just lolls
there, flopping from right to left.  Rivulets of pus that have weeped
from the festering scabs on his cock dribble down to the tip and stick
to his thigh, leaving a tendrilous strand of rotting white corpuscles
connected from tip to leg as the insignificant sausage swings to the
other side.  The cornflake & mayonnaise scabs formed as a result of
wank-friction as he frantically tries to beat some life into his dead
genitals.

Presumably.

Jim.
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Beer, me Mason!
Date: 23 Jan 93 15:52:19 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <katherim.727821419@sfu.ca>, katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
> 
> Our Phantom is not only non-corporeal, 

That's why he doesn't fuck! he, he, he, he, Beattlejuice! It 
is hard to be around here with all the chickeis and....
NOTHING! Get a body.

>he's clairvoyant!  

No, he isn't. To be clairvoyant, one needs to be a first 
class ghost. My bet is that he is the ghost of a dog.

>Now if only he was telekinetic, he could transport Graley out of here.

Yeah, but unfortunately he is not, and so I am afraid that 
we have to see again the megafucks of Graley. Shit happens. 
> 
> Katherine Merle Mason
> Ne Oublie....

	Michele
From: Cannam@sc.ZIB-Berlin.de (Chris Cannam)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Shut the fuck up, Moaner.
Date: 22 Jan 93 13:50:56
Organization: Konrad Zuse Zentrum fuer Informationstechnik Berlin
	<35618@olympus.wustl.edu> <1jnhk6INNssd@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: borodin.zib-berlin.de
In-reply-to: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk's message of 22 Jan 93 01:11:34 GMT


In article <1jnhk6INNssd@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk> maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:

   I would not refer to myself as 'people' since 'people' is a plural form, and
   there is only one of me.


Allah is indeed merciful.


--
           on sighting mathematicians it should unhook the algebra from their
             minds and replace it with poetry;  on sighting poets it should
               unhook poetry from their minds and replace it with algebra