HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: smeagol@carina.unm.edu (Karl P.)
Subject: Re: Excalibur #56 (SPOILERS)
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 17:12:36 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

     No, this is not an X-Book.  Just because it ties in once a while, but 
 ALL MARVEL BOOKS tie in the the X-Books nowadays.  (It's a dumb argument
 and we all have better things to do.)

In article <rlcarr.05gs@animato.network23.com> rlcarr@animato.network23.com (Rich Carreiro) writes:

>Questions:
> -- If Meggan is not bound by the "strings" Jamie manipulates, then
>    why was Meggan helpless against Jamie when they fought his alternate
>    during the Cross-Time Caper?

     Ah, but Meggan was in her "true-form" when she was beating the tar out of
 Jamie because she was immune to his powers and she didn't learn about her
 "true-form" until AFTER the Cross-Time Caper.  Also Meggan's perceptions change
 when she's in her "true-form" and she could only then see the lines of force
 that Jamie manipulates.

				---Kar-El (Last Surviving Dweeb of Krapton)	
-- 
????????????????????????????????  Bingo displays many traits which may be      
?   smeagol@carina.unm.edu     ?  interpreted as human.  Of course, it is  
?    Global Village Idiot      ?  unscientific to anthropomorphize a fifty-
????????????????????????????????  foot moon roach.  ---Sam (of Sam & Max)
From: jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: cable/stryfe/mr.sinister
Date: 15 Sep 92 18:58:46 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Sep15.173703.17748@njitgw.njit.edu> bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler) writes:

>In article <1992Sep15.164302.2258@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer) writes:
>>nova@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jennifer Baughman) writes:
>>
>>>Sure it's possible...  But theoretically, a clone of Cable would not have the
>>>_exact_ same scar in the _exact_ same place with the _exact_ same cybernetics!
>>>In theory, at least, if Stryfe were a clone of Cable, he would be a physically
>>>perfect (unmarked by scars, cybernetics, etc.) copy.  Therefore, Stryfe is
>>>_not_ a clone of Cable, or vice versa.  But I like the Cable/Stryfe/Mr. 
>>>Sinister deal... But it'll never happen.
>>
>>If someone has the technology to clone an individual, it would *not* be 
>>difficult to attach a few cybernetics and create scars in the right places.

>Sure, but why would you want to?  Okay, I can see why the cybernetics
>might be desired, but why only one eye and one arm?  And why the scars?
>You could do it, but you would have no logical reason to do so.

It's a Disguise. Yeah, that's it...
(Then again, why would you want to clone Jean Grey and have her
 hatch Scott's son?)

			Jamus Willer
{the opinions above are probably NOT those of
 anyone at all}
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: sbourgeo@pinocchio.Berkeley.EDU (Stephen Bourgeois)
Subject: Re: Who was the Traitor?
Reply-To: sbourgeo@pinocchio.Berkeley.EDU (Stephen Bourgeois)
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 14:36:52 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.135449.1@gallua.gallaudet.edu>,
12mwingfield@gallua.gallaudet.edu writes:
> AS of Wizard #14, there was a theroy that Bishop might be the one who the
> traitor, since he has a different perspective and philosophy of
handling those
> who broke Golden Age law.  Since, he is here with the current X-Men,
he find it
> frustrating to apply his philosophy to his tactics of  battling, he might be
> the one who decides that the X-Men should have a martyr, so he might
be the one
> who kills off Prof. X.  That might be a th


What about the fact that Bishop never heard of himself mentioned in the past
while he was being taught XSE doctrine?

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: 12mwingfield@gallua.gallaudet.edu
Subject: Re: favorites
Organization: Gallaudet University
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 00:21:17 GMT

Okie, here are my fave:

character: Omega Red, Archangel, Magneto (current), Wolverine, and 
           Longshot (when will he be back?)

Issue: the Inferno series was GREAT!!

Art cover:  X-Men Annua #10 with Alan Davis on Horde (COOL!)

Artist: Marc Silvestri, Rick Leonardi, and Jim Lee
From: jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Mimic ...
Date: 10 Sep 92 17:14:27 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Sep10.141926.16384@cc.gatech.edu> vernard@solaria.gatech.edu (Vernard C. Martin) writes:

>Hm. I don't have those issues featuring Calvin Rankin. If he wasn't a mutant
>then how did he get his powers and what exactly were his powers. I always
>thought that he was a mutant with the ability to copy (i.e. mimic) other
>mutants powers in the immediate vicinity. I also thought that he was dead.
>If someone can firmly clear this up, I would greatly appreciate it.

He showed up a while back in Marvel Comics Presents.
He had narrowly escaped death (surprise, surprise) and was hiding
in a cave, avoiding all human contact.
It seems that he couldn't control his absorbing powers and was
losing touch with his own personality.

Hmmmmm....

Ps. I wonder what would happen if Rogue absorbed his powers. Or vice versa.
Or both.

					James Willer
{the opinions above are probably NOT those of
 anyone at all}
From: gt6223b@prism.gatech.EDU (Jerry B. Ray)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Spider-Man is joining the X-Men!!
Date: 9 Sep 92 21:28:19 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <BuBnMs.3Mu@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> chak@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Matthew William Somers) writes:
>
>The only non-mutant to be an X-Man was Mimic.

Didn't someone mention that Psylocke is not strictly a mutant, having received
her powers from Merlin like Brian?  

JRjr

-- 
'Hear the tale of a fallen people, destined to wander their broken land.
Their eyes are vacant, full of empty meaning, and what they're missing they
just don't understand.  Beyond the dark horizon, out where the people are
crying, a Morningstar will be rising, rising to show us the way...' Whiteheart
From: chak@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Matthew William Somers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Hulk to Join the X-Men!!
Date: 11 Sep 92 23:23:37 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

In article <1992Sep11.223315.26246@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> jwlr@gauguin.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer) writes:
>In <1992Sep11.152004.1@woods.ulowell.edu> lombardif@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
>
>>My original article was meant as a joke, I guess you ALL missed
>>it ( or it wasn't that funny ) but anyway
>>Most of the X-Men were mutants, that IS their claim to fame
>>So if we can't laugh at comic, what CAN we laugh at??
>
   Something funny? :)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: MHART00@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU (mason hart)
Subject: Re: Favorites
Organization: Rice University  
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 09:05:53 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.060113.955@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au>
whijv2@cspyr1.cs.adfa.oz.au (WHITAKER JASON) writes:
 
>Characters : WOLVERINE, Gambit, Archangel(not the old one)
>             Shatterstar and Cable
>
>Writers: Anyone who has done at least 1 Wolverine
>
>Pencils: Silvestri!!!!!!!
>
>Inks: None, they are all bad and give good pencillers heart problems
>      Unless of course they they ink their own work.:)
>
>Storylines: Anything with Wolverine!!!!!!!
>
>Pet Hates: MOJO!!!!!! Stories involving this lard bucket are all rubbish.
 
I smell a Wolvie fanboy.
 
IMHO, Wolverine began to lose credibility as a character when
everyone and their dog wanted to write him into their own titles.
When he reverted to a crazed berzerker, said credibility was shot
to hell.  I miss the old X-men, pre-Mutant Massacre.  I miss the
old Wolvie.  Check out Classic.
 
As for Mojo, his potential for abuse by a writer is immense, but
Claremont had an excellent handle on his character.  Hama and Lobdell
just can't do Mojo, and their respective attempts were rather horrid.
Mojo's first appearances were great.  I wish his role in the
ressurrection of Psylocke had been properly explained, but with
Claremont out of the picture, that's unlikely.
 
Advice: pay closer attention to who writes the stories.  From one
writer to the next, characters can change drastically.  A person
who writes a Wolverine story is not necessarily a good writer.
 
 
"if it don't kill you, it can only make you stronger."
-- mason hart, rice u.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: Re: The Claremont Files are Coming
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 19:10:17 GMT

Due to an unforseen emergency (a paper due in MacroEconomics )plus my other
net.work (see Black Superheroes and LNH) The Claremont files have been delayed
till the end of the week.

I need the time to get the plot lines straight not to mention tyoe the damn 
things.

I promice I won't tease ya'll about them again untill they are ready.

-----SCAVENGER

-- 
KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai
From: m23364@mwunix (James Meritt)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Spider-Man is joining the X-Men!!
Date: 9 Sep 92 14:55:20 GMT
Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean VA

In article <1992Sep9.081154.1@woods.ulowell.edu> lombardif@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
}Yes, it's true!!! Spider-Man will soon be joining all the
}X-Groups as it is revealed that he IS, in fact, a Mutant.

Why should this be a consideration?  They have had non-mutant members.
In fact, one of their field commanders in action has been a non mutant.
From: das1417@ultb.isc.rit.edu (Grenadier)
Subject: Re: What about the Avengers?
Followup-To: rec.arts.comics.misc 
Originator: das1417@ultb
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 15:28:38 GMT

In article <eric.t.zmarzly.1-090992230720@lafmac23.lafortune.lab.nd.edu.> eric.t.zmarzly.1@nd.edu (Eric Zmarzly) writes:
>How come no one cares about the Avengers?  Is the world corrupted with
>mutant-lovers?  Is there any decency left in this world?
>

The reason no one is writing about Avengers here is because r.a.c.xbooks
is specifically for the X-BOOKS! (Gee what a surprise.)

Discussion on Avengers belongs in rec.arts.comics.misc.  Follow-ups
have been directed there.


-- 
 "If I speak, I am condemned.		David Stumme 
  If I stay silent, I am DAMNED!"	das1417@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
       -- Jean Valjean, a.k.a. 24601	das1417@ultb.isc.rit.edu
		"Les Miserables"	GEnie: D.STUMME QLink:Grenadier
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: REBECCA@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (Rebecca Drayer)
Subject: Re: New Warriors Discussion
Organization: Yale University
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 92 18:27:24 EDT

In article <Bu6BLu.KLs@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Deus Imperator) writes:
 
>In truth, much could be made of a storyline dealing with him in the vault.
>To my knowledge, all we see of the vault is a bunch of faces being kept behind
>high tech security, sitting, doing nothing.  It would be very awesome if
>we could see what life is like, from Marvel Boy's point of view, if only
>for brief glimpses.
>	I could also see them trusting Vance enough to leave his powers
>enabled, thus being a hell of a wild card in case of a break-out.
 
How would they disable his powers in the first place?  I know that the Vault
is supposed to be the result of the research done by Project: Pegasus, but
did they ever find a way to neutralize a telekinetic?
 
 
 
*************************************************************************
Rebecca A. Drayer, EMT        |    Rebecca@Yalevm.Ycc.Yale.edu
P.O. Box 6349 Yale Station    |    Computing Assistant
New Haven, CT 06520           |    Silliman College, Yale University
 
"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite
you.  This is the principle difference between a dog and a man."
                                                        -Mark Twain
*************************************************************************
From: lazarus@interceptor.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Scott Lobdell is still a moron...X-Men 294 spoilers
Date: 11 Sep 1992 01:02:58 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: interceptor.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <BuDFpK.9AF@rice.edu>, jimwong@owlnet.rice.edu (Jim Wong) writes:
>In article <18k899INNk0@venture.ksu.ksu.edu> lazarus@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith) writes:
>>
>>In article <92249.111101EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu>, EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu (Ernie Oporto) writes:
>>>OK...I'm going to write this as I'm reading X-Men #294.
>>>Page 3, panel 2: Security parameter?  Ex-squeeze me?  Thats perimeter, you
>>>    moron!
>>
>>No... "parameter" works...
>>
>Wrong.  Go check out the context; I'd be willing to bet large sums of money
>that the word was supposed to be "perimeter," but either Lobdell couldn't
>manage the spelling or the letterer screwed up.  The former possibility
>wouldn't surprise me too much, considering we live in a country, apparently,
>in which the vast majority of the citizens cannot distinguish "your" from
>"you're" or spell "weird" correctly.

I'm gonna stick by "parameter".  "Security parameters", as Bishop referred to
them, are a series of precautionary measures that needed to be used in order to
make sure nothing happened (kind of like a subroutine in a computer programme
uses variable parameters to invoke (or not) certain functions that will determine
the output of said programme).  Bishop felt that those measures were lax, and was
fearful that something would go wrong.  He was right...

>-- 
>Jim Wong (jimwong@owlnet.rice.edu)

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
In one week the 'Cats go hunting for Grizzlies...
"Do you live around here often?" -- Steven Wright -- "I Have a Pony"
From: bc751@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Howard Z. Shiau)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Thanks for all the replies to cartoon
Date: 8 Sep 1992 02:18:55 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bc751@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Howard Z. Shiau)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Thanks to all for the replies to my question regarding the 
cartoon.  I guess I'll just keep looking out.
-- 
Howard Shiau                       bc751@cleveland.freenet.edu
Cosyde Corporation                 
Organization: Freshman, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 20:32:18 -0400 
From: "Michael J. Keating" <mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: cable created by Mojo

Sorry, but of all of the cockamamie theories flying around, that is one
I refuse to buy into.
From: jwlr@gauguin.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: New X-Force and U.X-Men
Date: 7 Sep 92 23:28:57 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <67720@hydra.gatech.EDU> gt6223b@prism.gatech.EDU (Jerry B. Ray) writes:

>X-Men:

>Now for the good.  Spoilers, maybe.
>
>Now a question.  Didn't i read somewhere that 'Cable' shot the Prof with
>the transmode virus?  If so, where'd he get it from?  I know this is a
>stretch, but maybe they'll get Warlock and Doug back somewhere in this.
>After all, 'Lock is the only source of the virus we've seen other than
>the Magus, whos dead on some destroyed planet anyway.

From Commander Hodge, of course. (See next year`s Mega-X-over! I-)

>Maybe there is still hope (but i still want Claremont back!).

Here, here!

					James Willer
{the opinions above are probably NOT those of
 anyone at all}
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: dpeterso@sol.UVic.CA (Bruce Banner)
Subject: Re: X-Men Cartoon
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C. CANADA
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 92 05:45:32 GMT

In article <18els2INNpkf@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bc751@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Howard Z. Shiau) writes:
>
>I've been looking for the X-Men cartoon all weekend(Labor Day).
>When is it supposed to air?
>-- 


According to Marvel Age #117, the series start date has been "re-scheduled" to
sometime in October.  A specific date will be released sometime this month.

--Dale Peterson

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks,rec.arts.comics
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: REBEL YELL's latest gripe
Followup-To: rec.arts.comics
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 04:30:33 GMT

I, Rebel Yell, decided to take a break from the rescue of the LNH to do my
self apointed duty.
The subject: The latest issue of NOMAD.

Gambit's doppleganger(see inf.war) guest stars as the villian.  Now it's never
mentioned that it is a doppleganger but if you read the prevews you knew it was

The Problem:  THe story is that Dark Gambit (DG) is in Las Angelas(?) because 
he got on the wrong plane.  He thaught the L.A. on the ticket ment Louisiana.
(Isn't Los Angelas airport abreviated LAX, New Orleans is MSY). When Nomad is 
told this he reponds with:

"Louisiana?  You mean where David Duke's from?"

My questian is why.  How many Louisianas are there?  Was Nomad not sure if they
ment the state or the country? More to the point Why not "You mean where (New 
Orleans, Baton Rouge, Mardi Gras, Captain Marvel, Cinder and Ashe, Cat and Mouse
, Ronald Mann, John Dell, Swamp Thing, or Rebel Yell) is from?

I want to know what Niceza's reason's for mentioning Duke is.  Other than the
La govenor's race from last year, and a very brief (and now quite defunct)
presidential bid, Duke has gone on to be nothing more than another white
supremecist yelling in the street (perferably being runover in the street).
Nomad, as a character, probably wouldn't have even heard of Duke. He doesn't
strike me as the type who keeps up on political races.  I wonder if Niceza is
making some comment about Louisiana being a breeding ground for nazis.

As a Southerner and a Jew (not to mention a human being) I am greatly offended
by his implication.

-----REBEL YELL aka SCAVENGER aka Todd Kogutt

P.S. With that possible implication in mind, it puts his depiction of La's 
policemen in the XMen/Ghost Rider story in quite a new frame of mind.

P.P.S. Didn't Niceza write that SuperPro story that really pissed off a large 
group of Native Americans.  Hmmmm.


 
-- 
KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: The new X-Force and U.X-Men
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 04:09:37 GMT

Well it looks like that after a year, X-Force is finally starting to 
live up to it's potential. (Note I said starting to).  The past two issues
have been down right readable. I did not regret buying them.  
It looks like the New Mutants are back in all but name. Get rid of Feral and
change Warpath back to Thunderbird and it'll be just about right. 
Is it just me or does Kruel(the purple guy with the mace on his head) remind
anyone of a really lame Street Fighter II rip-off.  Also once again Milgrom
proved his inks can ruin anybody's pencils.

Then there's U. X-Men

What can I say but 6 more issues till I sadly drop the book.  The overall
plot was good.  But I'll credit that to Niceza, Harris, and maybe PAD laying
out the whole storyline.  The art was nice too.  But the scripting sucked wind.
What we had during Xavier's speech was another example of Scott "I can f**k up 
a book almost as bad as DeFalco and Harris" Lobdell trying to speek for equal
rights for all. This was worse than Alpha Flight 106.  Reading it I could only
think that if Claremont was writting it, this would be prob. as powerful and 
moving as Kitty's eulogy in the NEW MUTANTS suicide issue.  Maybe if Lobdell
takes off (or better yet Harris does) I'll stay past 300. But I won't hold my
breath.

------SCAVENGER

-- 
KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai
From: jgreene@dorm.rutgers.edu (Jeffrey Greene)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Who was the Traitor?
Date: 15 Sep 92 19:22:54 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael J. Keating) writes:

>Lets think about this for just a minute.  We've all been trying to
>figure out who it was that betrayed the team and killed professor X, and
>now the crossover goes and gives us an explanation and we ignore it. 
>Try to follow along.  First, we are given the hint that the assassin was
>Gambit.  Gambit has since become waaaaay to popular for the x-writers to
>lose as a team member,

This is exactly what happened.  At a convention in New York, I spoke to Scott
Lobdell about it, and he said that Gambit was indeed _supposed_ to be the
traitor, but it turned out that he was too popular for the higher-ups at Marvel
to let that happened.  He said he was currently working on who the traitor 
would turn out to be.  I asked if it was Nathan Summers, explaining with the 
theory that the X-Men are based on Arthurian legends (Professor X as Merlin, 
Cyclops as Arthur, Marvel Girl as Guenivere, etc.).  The theory went to equate
Madeleine with Morgan le Fey, thus giving Nathan as Mordred, the traitor.  At
this his eyes lit up, and he said he had never thought of that, but no, it
wasn't Nathan.
Then I told him straight off that it better not be Rogue, because that would 
ruin years of background and character development and would be a very dumb
move.  At this, his smile faded, as if that had been his plan all along.

>                        so they come up with an alternate traitor --
>Cable (who may or may not actually be Stryfe in disguise).  Remember --
>the costume Jean Grey was wearing when she made the recording about the
>betrayal (the tape that Bishop saw) was her current one. (With the
>current trend in comics fashion, that means that the betrayal had to
>occur in what would be our immediate future.)  Also, the blast that
>supposedly killed Jean on that tape was not indicative of Gambit's
>powers, but may have been a blast generated by such weaponry as
>Cable/Stryfe uses.
>There must be a real connection in there somewhere...  

Remember this as well.  Now that Bishop is in "our" timeline, the fact that he
had never heard of himself as a member of the X-Men could indicate that an
alternate future was created, and now the traitorous act will not be completed.

-jak
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Cable is Nathan Summers?
Date: 15 Sep 92 04:29:27 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <79769@ut-emx.uucp> nova@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jennifer Baughman) writes:
>Cable as Douglock???  I thought they handled the whole Doug Ramsey/Warlock 
>clone situation in X-Force Annual #1....
>
>Besides, if he were, I think they would have shown him shape-shifting.  Plus,
>neither Doug Ramsey or Warlock had telekinetic powers.

Of course, neither did Nathan Summers.

Still believing that Cable is not Nathan Summers (and with reasons to
back it up!)...

-- 
"Dog bites man--that's not a story.  Man bites dog--*that's* a story.  And
if the dog and the man slug it out for six issues, and then Wolverine shows
up for a guest appearance, and the dog turns out to be a mutant, that's a
*Marvel* story!"			-Marvel Editorial Handbook
Organization: Freshman, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA