HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ncramer@bbn.com (Nichael Cramer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jabberwoky (?)
Date: 15 Apr 1992 22:52:55 GMT
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Interzone Office
Distribution: na
Reply-To: ncramer@labs-n.bbn.com (Nichael Cramer)
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart) writes:
}luoni@bosco.mlb.semi.harris.com (Perry Luoni) writes:
}> Jabberwoky is a Monty Python movie.  It is one my least favorite 
}> of the Monty Python movies.  It is out on video.  I does have some 
}> funny moments but it is slow at times also.  The best of the Monty
}> Python movies is THE HOLY GRAIL
}Ditto.  One notch below "Eric the Vyking".  Even more disappointing
}since it came out shortly after "Holy Grail".

Just a dissenting opinion.

Actually I'm quite fond of both "Jabberwocky" and EtV.  

It's certainly true --as others have pointed out-- that neither is really a
Monty Python Films (in any sense of the term) but both films seemed to have
more depth, to be more [Oh, I don't know: "thoughtful", maybe] than your
standard Python movie.  

To my taste it's a little like complaining that "Annie Hall" isn't
"Bananas".

N
From: RXK110@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: BARTON FINK
Date: 15 Apr 92 19:21:20 GMT
Organization: HAM - Hackers Against MUDs
X-Subliminal-Message: IBM/370 assembler is your friend.

Somebody please explain a few things to me:

1. what is the connection between Charlie and the heat peeling the wallpaper
off the walls?

2. wha's the deal with the fire?

3. why does Chairlie say Heil Hitler?

4. what is the connection with the biblical story of Nabachanezzer?

Thanx
CHAINSAW
From: kirk@cs.duke.edu (Scooter Corleone)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jennifer Connelly...NOT
Keywords: Man from Snowy River
Date: 16 Apr 92 18:55:09 GMT
Organization: The Zymurgy Institute

In article <1992Apr14.013944.10968@cs.uow.edu.au> u8802356@cs.uow.edu.au (Elephant) writes:

>(I can't remember the name).
>
>The Elephant

...but I thought...

No worries,

Scooter Corleone

--
This has been a test of the emergency butthead system.
From: fajack@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: "Thelma & Louise" Scenery?
Date: 7 Apr 92 19:46:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: cc.1992Apr7.134647.54270
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1992Apr7.184447.18362@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, revillot@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Judy Tolliver) writes:
> In article <1992Apr6.150205.11720@inmos.co.uk>, boardman@inmos.co.uk () writes:
>> 
>> Does anyone know where the mountain featured in the opening
>> credits of the film, "Thelma & Louise" is situated ...?
>> This scene was pretty awe-inspiring, and I'd love to go there
>> one day!
>> I'd be very grateful for any help.
>> Cheers!
>> Rick Boardman
>> boardman@inmos.co.uk
> 
> Most of the red rock scenery was filmed along the main road through Arches National Park,
> outside of Moab, Utah.  Some of it was filmed in Canyonlands National Park, just south
> of Arches.
> 
> Judy Tolliver
>> 
>> 
	Isn't the movie suppose to take place in Arkansas ? Is it flat
in Arkansas ?

Jack Teh
From: v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Michelle L. Zafron)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: hammer
Date: 13 Apr 92 23:37:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <Ron_O'Hara.5074@tvbbs.wimsey.bc.ca>, Ron_O'Hara@tvbbs.wimsey.bc.ca (Ron O'Hara) writes...
>Anyone into watching the British horror movies produced by the famous
>Hammer studios? I'm curious to know all the Frankenstein titles.

Love their stuff.

The Curse of Frankenstein
The Revenge of Frankenstein
The Evil of Frankenstein
Frankenstein Created Woman
Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed
Frankenstein and the Monster From Hell

Also: The Horror of Frankenstein

>-- Via DLG Pro v0.991
--Michelle L. Zafron (v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Suppose that you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress.  But
 I repeat myself."
                                 --Mark Twain   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Lawnmowerman/Steven King
Date: 14 Apr 92 18:18:26 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

In article <54579@hydra.gatech.EDU>, ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU 
(Jorge Diaz) writes:

>>THE LAWNMOWER MAN, yet another spiritless, insipid, King-inspired horror 
>>film in the...                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Listen up, Phantom.
> 
> THE LAWNMOWER MAN is not a spiritless, insipid, King-inspired ANYTHNG.
> OK?  That movie has nothing in common with King's short story The
> Lawnmower Man, except the title.

Back off Jorge!  The Phantom said _Lawnmower Man_ was *inspired* by King,
not *based* on King.  And the director of the movie said that he was going
after the look and feel of one of King's works.  So yes, it was indeed 
inspired by all of the works of Steven King.  Also one glance at the 
Firestarter/Carriesque plot could tell you the same thing!

Greg Bole	                                     "Finger lickin' good!"
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu                        Bill Paxton in _Near Dark_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.native
From: agoyo1@athena.mit.edu (acee agoyo)
Subject: Re: Thunderheart
Keywords: American
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 18:18:49 GMT

Jeannine Crowfoot writes:
>but my wasichu husband understood it and enjoyed it also.
You call your husband wasichu?  :-) 
I guess you mean it in a loving way. :-) :-) :-)

acee agoyo
agoyo1, once again back is the incredible
From: ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: T2 is crap!
Date: 14 Apr 92 13:58:35 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <4766@krafla.rhi.hi.is> karlth@rhi.hi.is (Karl Thoroddsen) writes:

>He didn't have to kill Sarah, it would have been pointless (see below).

>>Much too civilized for a machine that hates humans, don't you think?

>T-1000 didn't hate humans, he killed them if it served his objective
>(Kill John).

Wrong.  He killed people who didn't serve his objective:

John's foster father.  What was the point?  He didn't need to pretend to be
him.  The T1000 had obviously fooled the man into thinking he was his wife.

There was no reason to kill him.

The man driving the Liquid Nitrogen truck.  Again, why?  He could have taken
the truck without killing the guy.

No reason.

Sarah, at least, would protect John.  We've seen this enough.  Here, he
had a real reason to want to kill her, and he didn't.

And it wasn't because the other Terminator rescued her in time (if he
hadn't been pussy-footing around trying to torture her, we would have
had plenty of time to kill her).

And it wasn't because he needed Sarah to call John.  With her dead, and
the 800 Series out of commision (supposedly), the T1000 could have taken
out John simply because there's no one left to protect him.  It can be
as patient as it needs - time means nothing to it.

The only reasons that the T1000 didn't kill Sarah are:

'We can't kill off the star'
'We have to leave her alive for the sequel'



-- 
Jorge Diaz                       | If winning is not important, then Commander,
Georgia Institute of Technology  |    why keep score?
Office of Information Technology | 
ccoprdj@prism.gatech.edu         |                     - Worf -
From: malhotra@duke.cs.duke.edu (Manish Malhotra)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jennifer Connelly's movies
Date: 13 Apr 92 15:35:44 GMT
Organization: Duke University Computer Science Dept.; Durham, N.C.

In article <1992Apr9.044444.13576@meteor.wisc.edu>, moonunit@meteor.wisc.edu (Chris Bovitz) writes:
> 
> From the ACTRESSES LIST:
> 
> Connelly, Jennifer      Career Opportunities
> 			Creepers
> 			Once Upon a Time in America
> 

   Is she the lead actress in "Once upon a time in America" ?
Truely, I don't know who she is. But if she is the lead actress
(the girl Noodles is after) of this film, then she has also acted 
in the Australian film "The man from snowy river". 


- Manish
From: wp11+@andrew.cmu.edu (W Darren Prouty)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jennifer Connelly
Date: 8 Apr 92 15:11:00 GMT
	<1992Apr8.135736.10281@cbnewsi.cb.att.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Freshman, Architecture, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

>I believe that is all of them. I was also told that she is in a new 
>Roy Orbisin music video.

yes, in various states of euphoria with that ultra-hip dude (not) Jason
Priestly from Bev Hills 90210 .......uggh! what is this world coming to.
From: lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Darkman - Crap (YES!)? Not hardly!
Date: 7 Apr 92 06:30:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: lynx.ytpjwbl
Organization: Living in a satellite fantasy, waiting for the night to end.

msr@kepler.unh.edu (Mathew S Reno) writes:

>> It was just a movie.  It doesn't have to be "acceptable". 
>
> Like hell. If a company is going to make a really cheesy movie, they
> should warn the consumers. 

Excuse me?  Hello!  Darkman is a SAM RAIMI MOVIE!  What more warning do
you *need*?  Raimi isn't exactly known for his sensitive character-driven
adult dramas. 

If you don't like movies for movies' sake and go into a movie cold, then
you don't have much room for complaint when you're disappointed. 

> You have to admit the edits were not done with too much care (In some
> cases too much!) 

I didn't have any problem with the editing of the movie.  They used a lot
of hyperbolic off-the-wall film technique, but lots of us *enjoy* that
kind of thing from time to time.  That's a large part of Raimi's appeal to me. 

>> _Darkman_: it was corny, but fun.  It scares me that such a movies as
>> this could cause one to say it was unacceptable, and he got sick... 
>
> I think it had the potential to be a good movie. The idea was original
> and with a better director an set of actors it could have been a good
> movie. 

With a "better" director it would have been a *boring* movie -- why do
you think that so many comic-book movies have gone direct-to-video
or been unreleased completely?  Raimi has a feel for the frantic,
cartoonish pacing that this kind of material desperately needs.

Now I'll admit that I would have liked to have seen Bruce Campbell playing
lead all the way through instead of just for one shot at the end, but Liam
Neeson did an amazing job with the script too.

--
Lazlo (lazlo@triton.unm.edu)
From: lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Using F)ollowup to start a new thread (was: on an unrelated subject...)
Date: 8 Apr 92 00:06:27 GMT
Article-I.D.: lynx.phqj8ar
Organization: Living in a satellite fantasy, waiting for the night to end.

If you're using the "F" key to start a new thread, all you have to do
is delete everything on the "References:" line in order to detach the
message from the ones that precede it.

Those of us using trn would be *really* grateful.

--
Lazlo (lazlo@triton.unm.edu)
From: frab@coos.dartmouth.edu (Pamela Chandran)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Prince of Tides: 0 for 7 (yes!)
Date: 10 Apr 92 19:57:27 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

kristyp@coos.dartmouth.edu (Kristy Patterson) writes:

>In article <1992Apr8.185902.16849@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> sws8n@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Stefan William Sittig) writes:
>>In article <7450@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> bohdan@cs.uq.oz.au writes:

>(long discussion about Barbra Streisand deleted...)

>>I agree with you.  I didn't mean that she needs to strive to be THE BEST, but
>>look around, are there ANY women directors getting nominated making movies, 
>>etc?  Please don't slam one of the few that actual gets a movie to the
>>mainstream!!  I can think of Penny Marshall, and that's about it.
>>Nora Ephron directed a movie this year, but who else?
>>			-Stefan


>Well, I'd say that Penelope Spheeris directed a movie that got into the
>mainstream... anyone heard of "Wayne's World?" :-)

>-Kristy

Spheeris has also directed the DECLINE OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION duo, which
is arguably mainstream cult.  Lili Fini Zanuck just directed RUSH.  Nancy
Savoca directed DOGFIGHT (w/River Phoenix) after her debut TRUE LOVE won
film festivals left & right.  Martha Coolidge directed RAMBLING ROSE after
having directed VALLEY GIRL.  Amy Heckerling has directed FAST TIMES AT
RIDGEMONT HIGH and LOOK WHO'S TALKING (we're talking mainstream, not
quality).  Susan Seidelman did DESPERATELY SEEKING SUSAN.  Kathryn Bigelow
and her action flix - BLUE STEEL, POINT BREAK, NEAR DARK.  Julie Dash,
the first African-American woman ever to make a feature film released in
the U.S., is bowling over N.Y. art houses with DAUGHTERS IN THE DUST. Lizzie
Borden, hanging up the feminist agenda, just did LOVE CRIMES.

And we haven't even gotten to Europe yet.

No, they're not getting nominated.  The Hollywood film industry is a big
boys club.  In the history of the Oscars, only one woman has ever been
nominated.  I would refute the idea that this is indicative of the level
of quality, however.

Pam
--
|[]|  Pamela Chandran  |[]| |[]|       It's      |[]| |  |------------------|  |
|  |-------------------|  | |  |    A Semiotic   |  | |[]|   Do Not Taunt   |[]|
|[]|Director, Dartmouth|[]| |[]|      World      |[]| |  |     Happy Fun    |  |
|  |   Film Society    |  | |  |-----------------|  | |[]|       Ball       |[]|
From: conrad@brahms.udel.edu (Jon Conrad)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Regarding Henry:Henry V vs Henry V: Shakespeare and Men's
Date: 10 Apr 92 13:39:18 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Delaware

In article <1992Apr9.162229.4877@Princeton.EDU> egnilges@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ed Nilges) writes:

>In article <28752@brahms.udel.edu> conrad@brahms.udel.edu (Jon Conrad) writes:

>>In article <1992Apr9.011042.27900@Princeton.EDU> egnilges@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ed Nilges) writes:

>>>Axiom (feel free to argue): Shakespeare was a poet first, a dramatist
>>>second.

>>Not even close to an axiom.  A highly debatable personal opinion of
>>yours.

>Then you'll have to explain why Shakespeare is rarely placed on stage
>unaltered, whereas he is almost always read in uncut form.  

Easy.  NO play, by anyone, is often staged without at least minor
alterations and cuts.  Even 20th-century plays undergo a tuck here and
there.  Such are the conditions of live theater.  And In fact, I've seen
a fair number of uncut Shakespeare plays onstage, and they weren't
special "festival" productions either.

>The 18th
>Century saw plot lines changed, whereas we now see plot lines preserved,
>but text cut, and cut substantially....so much so it changes meaning and
>even comprehensibility.  

Sometimes.  By no means always.

>For example, the viewer of the Olivier and
>Branagh films is puzzled by Montjoy's "thou never shalt see herald any
>more", for Montjoy seems to be a trustworthy diplomat and a stand up
>guy.  Henry's immediate riposte, "I fear thou wilt come to me for
>ransom" is cut.  The elision makes Montjoy's reappearance puzzling,
>whereas Henry's line makes Henry's rageful "comest thou for ransom" at
>Montjoy's reappearance after the battle completely comprehensible.

What do these films have to do with how the plays are presented onstage,
which is what you and I had been talking about?  

>The READER sees these things.  The viewer is normally denied them.  This
>means that Shakespeare is primarily a poet in the sense of talking to a
>reader.

Both the premise ("the viewer is normally denied them") and the
conclusion ("this means that...") are on shaky ground.  One could
equally well make the case that Shakespeare is such a supreme dramatist
that his centuries-old plays need only the most minor of adjustments in
the theater, while far more recent ones (check out the current revival
of "Private Lives") need brutal abridgement.

Jon Alan Conrad
From: wood@jfred.siemens.com (Jim Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: another oscar question
Date: 6 Apr 92 12:48:15 GMT
Distribution: na

buckmr@marcus.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire) writes:

>kho@athena.mit.edu (Karen W Ho) writes:

>>Just wondering...I've never figured out who traditionally gives out each big
>>award. (Last year's best actress presents oscar to this year's best actor-???)
>>Anyone, anyone?

>Yes, last year's Best Actor gives out this year's BEST ACTRESS and last year's
>BEST ACTRESS gives out this year's BEST ACTOR. Similar thing happens with 
>BEST SUPPORTING.

... Except that there are always exceptions to this rule.  Jeremy Irons
was last year's best actor winner, but Michael Douglas presented best
actress this year.  The other three winners from last year (Kathy Bates,
Joe Pesci, Whoopi Goldberg), did however present the traditional awards.

Last year, all 4 winners from 1989 presented the awards (Daniel Day Lewis,
Jessica Tandy, Denzel Washington, Brenda Fricker).  I can't recall an
Oscar year in which all 4 previous winners did this.

Jim Wood [wood@siemens.siemens.com] (609) 734-3643
  "Even if complaints about man-bashing in this film were 99% true, it still
   wouldn't make up for the years of portraying women as bimbos in movies."
     - Geena Davis, about "Thelma & Louise"
From: lsnow@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Linda Snow)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Whatever happened to...
Date: 6 Apr 92 17:15:14 GMT
Reply-To: lsnow@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Linda Snow)
Organization: NCR E&M CLEMSON Liberty, SC

In article <1992Apr04.031941.13805@onetouch.COM> jwidner@onetouch.COM (Jim Widner) writes:
>Whatever happened to the actor Timothy Hutton.  Seems like he has 
>faded from film.

For awhile he was on Broadway, starring in "Prelude to a Kiss".
.
.
.
.

From: cn@otter.hpl.hp.com (Colin Needham)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 07:25:29 GMT
Subject: Re: ROSANNA ARQUETTE - movie list wanted
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

>I try to assemble a list of all movies with ROSANNA ARQUETTE.

From the actress list (which was only posted a couple of days ago!!):

...Almost
8 Million Ways to Die
After Hours
Amazon Women on the Moon
Aviator, The
Baby, It's You
Big Blue, The
Black Rainbow
Dark Secret of Harvest Home (TV)
Desperately Seeking Susan (S:BA)
Executioner's Song, The (TV)
Fathers & Sons
Flight of the Intruder
Gorp
Having Babies II (TV)
Johnny Belinda (1982) (TV)
Long Way Home, A (TV)
More American Graffiti
New York Stories
Nobody's Fool
Off the Wall
One Cooks, the Other Doesn't (TV)
Ordeal of Patty Hearst, The (TV)
Parade, The (TV)
Promised a Miracle (TV)
Radio Flyer
S.O.B.
Separation (TV)
Silverado
Survival Guide (TV)
Sweet Revenge (1990) (TV)
Trying Times
Wall, The (1982) (TV)
Zuma Beach (TV)
"Shirley"
"Son of the Morning Star" (mini)

Cheers,

Col

------------------------------------------------------------
"Look at it this way, in a hundred years who's gonna care ?"
   -- The Terminator
------------------------------------------------------------
Col Needham                |  Phone: +44 272 799910 x 28704
HP Labs                    |  cn@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Bristol                    |  cn@hplabs.hpl.hp.com
U.K.                       |  cn@otter.hpl.hp.com
------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: nyberg@ms.uky.edu (Jack Nyberg)
Subject: Let's clear this T 101/800 thing up...
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 14:28:32 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
X-Bytes: 

   NERDS!!!NERDS!!!NERDS!!!

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.tv
From: jpehko@cs.joensuu.fi (Juha Pehkonen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Taxi Driver stinks
Date: 9 Apr 92 21:34:51 GMT
Organization: University of Joensuu

haraldf@stud.cs.uit.no (Harald Marius Fusdahl) writes:

>A couple of weeks ago me and some friends of mine went to the moviestore and
>rented what we thought was a cult movie, Taxi Driver. We could not belive our own 
>eyes it was so mindboggling boring. Can you people out there tell me what so
>fucking great about it. Personally i think Martin Scorceses smoked his own socks
>before he directed that movie. The only entertainment in the movie was the last
>ten minutes of the movie. but the Norwegian film control cut all the shit to
>pices. So you people out there give in and say that you agree with me!.

I find it very very frustrating to tell other people why I enjoyed watching
a certain film, so I won't do it. If you didn't like Taxi Driver, fine, it's
your opinion. Let the others have their opinions.

Juice
From: mbrockma@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Matt Brockman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Dead Again: Plot conflicts
Date: 15 Apr 92 14:13:17 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Twin Peaks Sheriff Department

In article <204949@unix.cis.pitt.edu> jmgst26@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Joseph M Goodwin) writes:
>Well, spoilers will follow

>
>Ok, let me know if I've got this straight.  The theme of the movie is
>getting revenge in another life.  All along, the hypnotist has his 
>opportunity to kill Amanda, once he saw the picture in the paper.
>Why didn't he?  Then he'd be free until the next lifetime :-)

The hypnotist couldn't be sure it was the same Amanda until he
had her go back in here memories during a session. That's why
he showed up and gave Branagh his card. (He might have picked up
on "Die Shears", but it was printed as "Disher" and he may not have
picked up on it, or dismissed it as possible coincidence and
wanted to make sure under hypnosis.)

>Another theme is fate, and fate brought the two main characters
>(played by Brannagh and his wife) back together, but why did she have 
>memories that she was killed by her husband?  Are we to believe that 
>the hypnotist could also employ mind control? 

Grace didn't have memories of being killed. The hynotist told here
to "remove hereself from the story as if merely an observer." She
just filled in events that she as Roman must've assumed had happened
or made up (like the opening sequence where someone is stabbed in the
prison.) This may be connected to whatever trauma caused her to lose
her memory and be confused enough to find the same mansion.
 
>Lastly, why didn't 
>Brannagh's character profess his innocence of the murder.  He seemed
>to accept that fact that he had been convicted and he was going to his death.

He loved his housekeeper and son like family and was willing to
die to protect them. Besides, he was depressed and broke and may
have cinsidered suicide before his wife was killed and this was 
the best way to go, since it also protected his housekeeper and son.

>I jus thought of another contradiction.  Amanda had memories of being stabbed by her husband before this hypnotist character entered the picture.

The memories must have been triggered by whatever trauma caused here to 
lose here memories and speech in the first place. She regressed so far back
that she ended up seeing the Strauss mansion as familiar.
We just don't know anything about what happened to her in the
first place to trigger her past memories.

Note: She was having memories/nightmares about her wife being stabbed!
      Grace == Roman Strauss

Hope this helps a little....

===============================================================================
Matt Brockman                                           mbrockma@ecn.purdue.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "While a llama may produce some of the world's finest of wools, prized around
 the world, their breath, on the other hand, could only be prized somewhere in
 the far reaches of llama hell."		  -Agent D. Cooper, TWIN PEAKS
===============================================================================