HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Floyd Goodrich)
Subject: Re: Dallas/Skins Wrapup + *icednotes*
Organization: Motorola Inc., Austin Tx.
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 15:10:16 GMT

In article <18oarsINNn08@news.aero.org> mas@aero.org (Marcus A.Shaw) writes:

Good report, ice.  I share most of the same opinions.  Except this one.

>* Kelvin Martin... need I say more?  Well maybe I will.
>He was one of the top punt returners at BC his senior
>year (3rd in the nation).  When he made the Cowboys, I
>was happy to see him on return duty and knew it would 
>take him a year or two to settle into the return scheme.
>Then, the Boys put Sheppard back there and Martin didn't
>return kicks again until last year.  Now he's is back into
>the swing of things and should be a good one for
>quite a while....sweetness

K-Mart's punt return for a TD was truly awesome.  He was runing on his 
own for the last 55 yards after exploding through a seam.  Truly a thing
of beauty.

BUT...I think he made the wrong decision on at least 3 other punts.  Two
fairly short punts (30-35 yards) he let bounce.  They each rolled another
20+ yards.  And he fair caught a line drive on the 10 yard line that probably
would have hit at the 3 and gone into the end zone.  On the punt he returned
for a TD, I was wondering if he was going to do something not so wise again.
I was quite pleasantly surprised.  I know he's good for a few big returns a 
year, but I personally would like to see more consistency.  And of course
more returns for TDs.


Floyd Goodrich
floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bcd@fang.att.com (Brendan Dwyer)
Subject: Re: Tampa Bay Bucs question
Organization: AT&T Tax Systems Development, Maitland FL
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 17:04:26 GMT

From article <14SEP199209425940@summa.tamu.edu>, by burt@summa.tamu.edu (Burt Juarez):
> There was a player with the Bucs last year named Robert Wilson.  Does anyone
> know the status of this player.  Is he on injured reserved or was he cut
> from the team?????  I've checked the stats for the 2 previous games, and he
> didn't seem to play!   Help.
> 
> 
Robert Wilson was cut.  The Bucs backfield consists of Gary Anderson,
Reggie Cobb, Alonzo Highsmith and Stanford Jennings.  

Does anyone know who has the number one ranked defense in the NFL?  Some
guy at the Buc vs Packer game yesterday told me the Bucs are ranked #1.
This sounds too good to be true.

Brendan Dwyer
Buc Fan.
Foaming at the mouth.
Nipples rock hard.
GO BUCS!!!!!!!!!!
From: chico@athena.mit.edu (Thomas A Weston)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Niner's look good (IMHO)
Date: 14 Sep 92 20:22:34 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In article <1992Sep14.165758.12560@equalizer.cray.com>, mcs@fps.com (Mike Sanfratello) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep9.031701.28490@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
|> >
|> >I have a different outlook on the SAME game.  The score could have
|> >been 40+-14, Niner's winning.  What I saw was a Niner team pretty much
|> >in control, except for the stupid penalties.  If they can avoid these
|> >penalties (fingers crossed), the Bill won't have a chance.
|> >-- 
|> >        ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
|> Yep, the Bills didn't have a chance, even playing away, on grass, yep,
|> never a chance.  NOT!!  NFC baahh!
|> 
|> mike
Uh, excuse me, but didn't he say that "if they can avoid these penalties..."  The
niners, even without a placekicker, would very likely have won the game were it
not for the holding call on Steve Wallace.  Wallace held the guy Bruce Smith when 
neither was really involved in the play.  That was clearly a stupid penalty.  In the
future, you should probably read what he has written and watch the game before
you bitch at him.

  ________________      __      ______________
 /_______________/|    /_/|    /_____________/|  San Francisco 49ers
|                ||   |  ||   |              ||  Los Angeles Lakers
|    __     __   ||   |  ||   |_____    _____|/  Los Angeles Dodgers
|  ||  |  ||  |  ||   |  ||         |  ||        Penn State Nittany Lions
|  ||  |  ||  |  ||   |  ||         |  ||    
|  ||  |  ||  |  ||   |  ||         |  ||     "Joe just said that he'd throw
|  ||  |  ||  |  ||   |  ||         |  ||      the ball and that I should 
|  ||  |  ||  |  ||   |  ||         |  ||      go out and get it."
|  ||  |  ||  |  ||   |  ||         |  ||                     - Jerry Rice
|  ||  |  ||  |  ||   |  ||         |  || 
|  ||  |  ||  |  ||   |  ||         |  || 
|__|/  |__|/  |__|/   |__|/         |__|/      Thomas A. Weston
From: nelson@rrc.chevron.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Status of Kieth Jackson ?  (philly)
Date: 9 Sep 92 15:40:04 GMT
Reply-To: nelson@rrc.chevron.com
Organization: Chevron, Richmond, California


Does anyone know the satus of Kieth Jackson of Philly?
	1.  Is he still not signed?
	2.  What are the prospects for a near term signing?
---
David Nelson
 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Subject: Re: Tootie Robbins
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 01:24:26 GMT

In article <1992Sep8.231255.17586@sharebase.com> pagel@sharebase.com (Tom Pagel) writes:
>packer fans:
>
>what's the word on tootie robbins?  i thought i saw him standing on 
>the sidelines with his arm in a sling and some other guy playing RT.
>
>if he's out for an extended period, it's big trouble for green bay.
>
>well, at least ruettgers had a great game against doleman.  :-)  :-)
>
>i only got to see the second half (no audio either - it was at a casino),
>but they didn't look too bad.
>
>tom		pagel@cheesehead.sharebase.com
>
   Robbins dislocated his shoulder. In the papers here, they think he has
   a shot at playing next week. Very questionable though. Harvey Salem came
   in and did a fine job with just three days practice. BTW, while I was
   watching the game at a bar some guy there came up with a great line right
   after Robbins was hurt. "First my mom names me Tootie and now this!" 
   Anyway, the Pack looked okay. Six wins and a return trip to the Pro-Bowl
   for Sterling Sharpe look good after week one.

   --salty

   p.s. What's up with the Viking backers??!! They beat
   the Pack in OT and it's "Super Bowl here we come!!"
   I mean they looked okay, but jeez!!!! And I thought
   Packer-backers were overly optimistic about their team!


Organization: Freshman, CIT general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Tue,  8 Sep 1992 21:43:23 -0400 
From: Erik Karl Witte <ew2r+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Packer/Viking thoughts (Packer fan viewpoint)

To John Heim:

Thanks for the update.  I am a Packer fan displaced in Pittsburgh and
never even caught the highlights.

Secondary:  I'm encouraged to hear about the part of our defense that
was less than stellar last year.  Vinnie Clark seems to be improving
steadily.  The coverage sacks, though, are somewhat dissapointing
because that shows that the defensive line has lost the penetration they
showed last year, and they seem to have lost the rushing defense to.

Offense:
  Rushing:  Seeing the pack have success on the ground is encouraging,
and shows clearly the end of the Infante era.  The question is, do they
have the talent to really run?  Hopefully, but probably not.

Overall:  We need better than 6-10, but it won't happen.

Go Pack, but also Steelers, Lions, Falcons, and Cowboys.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jason@cray.com (Jason Parker)
Subject: Minnesota Vikings wk2 STATS
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 14 Sep 92 16:22:29 CDT

TEAM
Minnesota Vikings (1-1)

GAME SUMMARY

          Minnesota  Detroit*
Rushing   26-95      29-73
Pass Att  20-36-3    10-15-1
Pass Yds  175        96
Fum Lost  1          0
Poss      31:49      28:11
Pts       17         31

VIKINGS INDIVIDUAL STATS

PASSING
Gannon 20-36-3 175 1P

RUSHING
Gannon    5-34
T. Allen 12-33 1T
Craig     8-24
A. Carter 1-4

RECEIVING
A. Carter 5-45 1T
Jones     4-47
Allen     4-32
Jordan    3-26
C. Carter 2-27
Craig     2-13

KICKING
Reveiz 1F (52) 2X

SACKS
Doleman 1
Randle  1

INTERCEPTIONS
McMillian 1

INJURIES
(I don't have this info, but it could be useful to post what
 might be known here...)

SUMMARY NOTES
The Vikings defence did a great job, but Detroit's special
teams and big play defence blew them out.

OTHER NOTES 
*= Home team
P= Touchdown Pass Thrown
T= Touchdowns Scored
F= Field Goal Scored (number in parens is distance)
X= Extra Point Scored
PASSING: completions,attempts,interceptions, TD passes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

This posting follows the proposed format of the NFL TEAM STAT PROJECT
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Re: need stats for Browns/Dolphins game
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 20:50:34 GMT
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.

In article <1992Sep15.100700.4978@ecl.psu.edu> s1a@ecl.psu.edu writes:
>Could someone please e-mail me the following stats from the 
>Dolphins/Browns game last night.  I need them for a fantasy football
>league and the *wonderful* State College PA newspaper doesn't bother to
>publish MNF stats, EVER.     
>
>The stats I need are:
>Dan Marino passing and rushing yardage

25-35-300 1TD, 0 INTs
2 rushing yards (funny, it wasn't listed, but on one of the sacks, he actually
gained 2 yards..)
>Mark Duper receiving and rushing(?) yardage
4 catches - 70 yards, 1TD
>Leroy Hoard receiving and rushing yardage
2 rushes, 0 yards
1 catch,  2 yards

>Bobby Humphrey receiving and rushing yardage
2 rushes, 11 yards
4 catches, 24 yards
>Distance of Pete Stoyanovich's field goals
22 yards, 32 yards
>Number of sacks by the Brown's defense
2, 19 yards lost...
>
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Dave Salvia
>
>                    


-- 
David T. Meeks                    ||" We are jigsaw pieces, aligned on the 
VMark Software, Inc.              ||  perimeter edge, 
uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  interlocked through a missing piece"
davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||" ...This world is totally Fugazi"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: GOD I HATE THE RAMS!
Keywords: Tegger speakth
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 21:34:32 GMT

In article <1992Sep4.155017.5083@javelin.sim.es.com> wkirkpat@javelin.sim.es.com writes:
>jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Sep3.173925.15448@cci632.cci.com> teg@cci632.cci.com (Thomas Gauger) writes:
>>>
>>>The TEGGER speaks:
>>>
>>>Ye sayth unto thee that the Bills shall win thy game against thy
>>>Mountain Goats. Thy Mountain Goats shall be rousted from thyne playing
>>>field by thy boisterous fans. Thee subject Everest shall be caused to
>>>tumble from thy Mountain and shall not return.
>>>
>>>The all great and powerful TEGGER has spoken!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>>==================================
>>>The TEGGER
>>>Rochester's self proclaimed #1 Bill's Fan
>>>
>>>Section C5
>>>Row 32
>>>Seats 109 & 110
>>>
>>>GOD I HATE THE RAMS!!!
>>>
>>>Buffalo: 17
>>>Rams:    10
>
>>Have you had deep pit, barbequed goat?  Hmmm, Hmmmm, Good!
>>The Rams are a team I really dislike and I just remembered
>>I also dislike the Bills.  Therefore, my prediction is
>>truly "unbiased".
>
>>Buffalo: 27
>>Rams:    35
>
>If you are as unbiased as you say,then you must be stupid
> 
>
>Bills  : 31
>Rams   : 13 
>
>How could it go the other way-huh?
>-- 
Why are so defensive? What are you, a commie?!  As Abe Lincoln
once said in 1873, "Them rebels under estimated us Yanks".
Frankly, I really don't give a hoot who wins this game. 
I was simply giving a prediction that has as much validity
as yours.  If you're such a hotshot in determining scores, 
you must be a TRILLIONAIRE. NOT!  I presume you must have seen
your team lose to obvious lesser talented team, haven't you.
That is what makes all the odds makers and especially the
Vegas/Reno bookies so rich! As Robert Blake used to say
or probably still does, "You can take that to the bank!"
-- 
        ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
 		"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
	       is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
From: rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Cards/Eagles
Keywords: Life is unfair
Date: 14 Sep 92 15:05:56 GMT

To quote one of my mothers favorite sayings, "life is unfair". And I got
a nice reminder last night in the Cards/Eagles game as Timm Rosenbach
got hurt againt and is out indefinitely with a separated right throwing
shoulder. 

What an amazing streak of bad luck, an ACL, a concussion, and now this.

The Eagles dominated the game because the Cards couldn't run, and couldn't
stop Walker from running. Aeneas Williams(playing with a deep thigh
bruise) was burned repeatedly by Fred Barnett for big pass plays and
the Eagles won 31-14.

I was impressed with Chris Chandler off the bench, and Eric Swann played
a nice game and looks ready to start again, but it looks like yet another
year of wait till next year for the Cards. No offensive line, and an
obvious hole on defense at nose where Jim Wahler is just too small.

It could be an interesting few weeks though for the Cards, look for
Bugel to get fired by the 6th game if things don't improve, and I really
expect to see some trades now, especially with the McNeil case making
the draft uncertain. Luis Sharpe wants out and will probably get his
wish(a local rumor monger on the radio said the 49ers offered DT Dennis
Brown for him, I might take it at this point since a draft pick is
too uncertain), either Johnson or Thompson will be gone(probably Thompson
since he didn't get any action at RB against Philly), and I wouldn't
be surprised if they went ahead and traded a guy like Freddie Joe Nunn
for a younger player too. 

I just see the team sensing they can't win this year and overhauling
in midseason with so much uncertainty about the state of the league
when the year is over.

Here's hoping Rosenbach isn't cursed, the guy is a tough kid who can help
this club turn it around, but the OL is determined to get him killed.

 


Russ Smith
*******************************************************************************
"Get your hands off me you damn, dirty ape!"
                                   Charlton Heston- Planet of the Apes
********************************************************************************
From: dave@bradley.bradley.edu (David Vessell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bucs coach
Date: 10 Sep 92 02:46:06 GMT
Organization: Bradley University

lej@pdn.paradyne.com (Leo James) writes:

>Yeah,  I know for a fact that the "official" NFL stance is that the
>1979 Buccaneers is the team that made the expansion-to-playoff team
>transition the fastest.

Now for some real trivia....does anyone know the fastest expansion-to-
playoff team in major league sports?

-- 
=========*davE*.....making the world safe for intelligent dance music.=========
        "Love's for fools wise enough to take a chance...." - Amy Grant
--------------------------{dave@bradley.bradley.edu}---------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rfedkiw@olympic.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw)
Subject: Bills
Organization: UCLA Mathematics Department
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 92 02:21:45 GMT

In Article 27813, John P. Gloria writes ...
>...
>Buffalo: 27
>Rams:    35
>...


Sounds pretty stupid to me.

--
Ron Fedkiw (rfedkiw@redwood.math.ucla.edu)

A plan is made by someone who is sitting and thinking ...
while others are doing.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Redskins played like slobs?
From: mzener@eagle.wesleyan.edu
Date: 10 Sep 92 13:35:51 EDT
Organization: Wesleyan University

Nope, they played like they were starting camp...

(Mark A. Blickhan) writes:

> The play of the "Super Bowl" champions in no way resembles that of last
> year's team.   WHY?

   The defense played well, considering the situation.  That sounds crazy, but
consider this -- with the loss of Millen and injury to Williams, their middle
run defense is shallow, and Dallas picked apart the defense.  But Dallas, for
some reason, ALWAYS picks apart their defense.  I see no augury predicting doom
for the 'Skins D.
   The offensive line was playing confused, due mostly to Lachey's holdout and
Addicke's injury.  They were suffled so much during training camp that they
never got into a groove.  A hungry defense made them make mistakes.  Lachey's
skills were NOT up to par.   
   Neither were Rypien's.  His holdout cost the 'Skins this game.  He missed
two 50+ yard bombs that would have been sure touchdowns by a TOTAL of maybe
twelve yards.  He would have hit those had he been practicing for more than a
week (as proved by last season's accuracy), and that would have turned the game
around.

   My Conclusion:  If the Redskins manage to win the next two games, and this
blowout might give them enough fire to do that, and if they can beat Dallas at
RFK, the 'Skins will be serious contenders -- under that scenario, they WOULD
make the playoffs, and then all bets are off.

Max
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bernie@lgc.com (Bernie De La Torre)
Subject: Re: QB ratings, week 2 & cumulative
Organization: Landmark Graphics Corporation
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:16:12 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.144849.19419@ncar.ucar.edu> gary@colossus.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) writes:
>
>[E-mail corrections appreciated.]
>
>Week 2 (minimum 10 attempts):
>Pos Name              Atts Comp   Cmp%  Yards  AvgGn TDs  TD % INT  IN%   RATE
>--- ----------------  ---- ----   ----  -----  ----- ---  ---- ---  ---   -----
>  1 R. Cunningham       22   17   77.3    267  12.14   3  13.6   0  0.0   156.6
>  2 V. Testaverde       25   22   88.0    363  14.52   2   8.0   0  0.0   145.4

This just shows how flawed the formula for computing the quarterback rating
is. Testaverde had a nearly perfect game and still ranks below Cunningham
who through for less yards, had a lower completion % and avg gain per throw.
IMHO, too much weigth is given to touchdown passes.




--
*-------------------------------------------------------------*
*    Bernie de la Torre  Landmark Graphics Corporation
*    333 Cypress Run     Houston, Texas 77094   (713)-579-4680
*    bdelatorre@lgc.com  Rm 247
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: robert@landru.mtc.ti.com (Robert Treese)
Subject: Re: New Cowboys
Keywords: Haleyn
Organization: Manufacturing Technology Center, Texas Instruments, Dallas
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:06:02 GMT

In article <1aoeoq8@Unify.Com> tsv@dbrus.Unify.Com (Tim Vannaman) writes:
>In article <1992Sep09.141320.427@bnr.ca> patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power) writes:
>>  The Dallas newspaper stated that Haley is a free agent after this year.
>>SF eliminated the final year of his contract in an effort to appease him 
>>last offseason.  That's why we got him so cheap, we were leasing not buying. :)
>>
>>
>>
>>Other news:  Casillas should be available, Maryland -- maybe/maybe not.  Emmitt
>>trails Terry Allen (vikings) in the race for rushing title.  Cleveland stole
>>OG Myslinksi off the 'Boys practice squad.  Myslinski was the last of four
>>OL drafted by Dallas this year.  2 were cut, Milstead was traded to the Browns.
>
>How does someone get stolen off the practice squad, doesn't dallas have to
>put him thru waivers first?

Players may be signed from other teams practice squad if they are going to
be put on the team that signs them active list.  I hope that makes sense

Robert

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: 49er's Seifert - DUMP COFER
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 05:47:36 GMT

In article <BuLCHF.Jrw@vcd.hp.com> kevinc@PROBLEM_WITH_INEWS_GATEWAY_FILE writes:
>John P. Gloria writes:
>: 
>: Although I agree with you in part that Cofer should be replaced,
>: he did not lose the game vs the Bills.  Two high explosive
>: offenses battled it out and the Bills came out on top.
>
>  ________
>
>  This is a typical liberal response, and for a number of reasons
>  it is totally wrong. Let me tell you why.
>
Gee, is this a compliment?
>      Kickers have a realativly easy job i.e. just kick the ball
>      through the goal posts. THATS ALL THEY DO !! They don't have
>
It is easy for you I suppose to spout rhetoric without foundation.
I am not defending COFER, but I fail to comprehend your idea
that making a field goal is EASY.  I am not making excuses for
COFER, but if a RB fumbles, he can usually redeem himself.
If it is 2nd and 7 and the QB overthrows the wide open WR,
he can likewise redeem himself on the next play.  When there
are only seconds left in a game and the FG kicker misses, he 
usually doesn't have a second try.  If you have you mind made up 
that kickers have an easy job, then common sense will not persuade 
you to have a second chance to rethink and change your mind.


>      The bottom line is: a Kicker is the only guy on the field
>      who is specifically paid to score points. Not to rack up yardage
>      or decide when to play man or zone defense or block and tackle.
> 
The kicker is the only guy on field who is paid to specificially
score points? Huh?  I think you have the wrong news group.
This is about football. You know, QB passes to WR or RB and
they score points?  

>      So if the score is 31 to 34, and Cofer is called. They expect
>      him to make the field goal. Thats what they paid for.
>      If he misses more than a couple, better get rid of him. It
>      did wonders for Norwood and Johnson.
> 
Hey, if it is 2:07 left to play, it is the QB's responsibility 
to drive down the field and win the damn game.  The team's 
inability to score is not the fault of the kicker. On this
particular game, the Niners had their opportunities to WIN
the game. They should not have to rely on a kicker to bail them out.
Yes, I agree that COFER should be replace based on his
overall performance the last couple of years, but he did not
lose the game.  The 49'er TEAM lost the game.

-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "I have great faith in fools - self-confidence my
   friends call it."        Edgar Allan Poe
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: azjohn@eagle.larc.nasa.gov (John Paul Phillips)
Subject: Re: Who's got the toughest schedule?
Reply-To: azjohn@eagle.larc.nasa.gov (John Paul Phillips)
Organization: NASA
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 17:59:01 GMT

In article <BuBID4.E3F@news.larc.nasa.gov>, azjohn@eagle.larc.nasa.gov (John 
Paul Phillips) writes:

> The top four teams are from NFC East and next four are from AFC West. The 
> reason for this is that both divisions are scheduled to play against each 
> other this year. Excluding intradivision play (10-10 for five-team 
                                                 ------
> divisions), last year's record for NFC East was 37-23, and for AFC West was 
> 32-28. IMO, NFC East teams have the toughest schedule because they have to 
> play each other. AFC West have the next toughest schedule because they have 
> to play NFC East. The records indicates that this is the case. Notice that 
of 
> last year's playoff teams, Houston and Buffalo have the easiest schedules, 
> and that, excluding AFC West, every team from #1 to #16 are from NFC! That 
> would indicate that overall, NFC were superior to AFC last year.

Oops! It should be 20-20, so it's really 27-13 for NFC East and 22-18 for AFC 
West. Anyway, it still supports my statements!


Cowboys Forever!

------------------------
       John Paul Phillips   
             "Azjohn"         
         NASA/Langley        
azjohn@eagle.larc.nasa.gov
Organization: Central Michigan University
Date: Tuesday, 15 Sep 1992 07:46:24 EDT
From: <3ZASIB3@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Herman Moore and Reggie Barrett
Distribution: rec

Moore is expected to be back in four weeks.  However, the problem is a
torn muscle which could mean longer.  Barrett did play in his place on
Sunday and did very well, as I recall.  Moore did play over that injury
in the Chicago game.  It got worse during the week.  Bob