HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Dick Everhart <necis!dicke@transfer.stratus.com>
Subject: USR DualStandard on 3.2.4
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:29:35 GMT
Precedence: bulk


I concede!  I have to ask for help.

I have been trying to get my USR HST Dual Standard modem to work for 2400 and
higher xbbs and uucp users.  Needless to say, I haven't succeeded.

Using a standard 2400 baud Hayes configuration works fine.  I tried Mr.
Deignan's configuration for his 16.8k baud modem he recently posted, and the
users get garbage.  I'm not surprised.  I've also tried a couple of other
configurations, and again, the callers get garbage.

I have to think that someone else out there is using one of these.  If you are,
I would appreciate knowing what your gettydef and Dialer entries look like.

Thanks in advance,

 ******************************************************************************
 Dick Everhart (ARS kc1iy)                               dicke@necis.ma.nec.com
                          Senior Software Test Engineer
                             NEC  Technologies, Inc.
 (508) 635-6229                                                      kc1iy@kb4n
 ******************************************************************************
From: darkshot@rock.concert.net (Michael B Garrett -- Chudys)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: ODT 2.0 weird error
Date: 28 Jan 93 19:27:09 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: CONCERT-CONNECT -- Public Access UNIX

Sorry to interrupt the Unix Wars, but has anyone seen this error message?

xxassert: error in line 5681

....and so on ad infinitum. The machine locked up when this error
started repeating; a cold boot seems to have stopped it. Sar reports
and crash stats reveal nothing wrong immediately before it happened.

Any ideas?

'Shot
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu (Mike S.)
Subject: gcc 2.2.2 under SCO: libform.a link problems
Organization: BITS, St. Louis, MO
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:37:46 GMT
Summary: Having problems linking with libform.a under gcc
Keywords: sco 3.2.2 libform.a gcc link problem

(SCO 3.2.2 OS+DevSys, gcc 2.2.2)

Using gcc to compile/link a program using SCO's forms package,
we get unresolved references on regexp() and regcmp(), which
are first referenced in /usr/lib/libform.a

Without changing ANYTHING on the compile or link commands,
but using SCO's cc instead of gcc, we don't get the link errors.

The end of the library list on the link line looks like:

	-lpanel -lmenu -lform -lcurses

I would suspect something was out of order if SCO's cc hadn't
worked, but as it stands, I can't think of what the problem
could be..  Could SCO's cc be searching more than just the
standard libraries?  (but gcc still uses SCO's linker, so
I don't see how that could be the case)  In any case, I have
used nm to parse all libs in /lib, /usr/lib and can't find
regexp()/regcmp().

Any help appreciated!

Mike
-- 
mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: Western Digital HD
Date: 23 Jan 93 16:02:22 GMT
Organization: Izot's Swamp

/dev/null <alexl@alvarez.COM> writes:

> Does anyone know what a Western Digital WD-93044-A Hard Drive is?

   Sounds like the first generation of 40 megabyte IDE drive; I believe that 
these were inherited from Tandon when WD bought them.

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
From: Frank@mindlink.bc.ca (Frank I. Reiter)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: PC Unix/Xenix vendors
Date: 28 Jan 93 15:09:58 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada

> Larry Snyder writes:
>
> >The gap has existed to date because SCO has (correctly) been seen as the
> >industry leader in market share.
>
> That is "self proclaimed industry leader"

Your tone suggests "self proclaimed and undeserved" which is a little unfair.
Even Larry (tm) would have to agree that having 3 out of 4 installed systems
makes one "The industry leader in market share" in the Intel unix market.

Frank.
--
___________________________________________________________________
Frank I. Reiter                 Internet: Frank@mindlink.bc.ca
MIND LINK! Communications Corp. Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: rickf@pmafire.inel.gov (Rick Furniss)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 21:51:09 GMT
Organization: WINCO
Subject: SCO 3.2.v2  SCSI wont access tape drive ??? nodes missing.
Followup-To: 
Distribution: biz
Organization: WINCO
Keywords: scsi,nodes,unix



   Any help would be appreciated.

Problem:  I,m unable to get the scsi Archive VP series to work.
          Wont access the drive,  gives no Spt nodes to link.

     I have deleted the Cartridge driver as required, then added a scsi
tape at ID:0 LUN:2 , card:0,   but still no worky ?

     Anybody have scsi Archive tape on SCO V3.2.2 that can help ?


thanks

***** standard DISKclamer *****
personal views of my person only

CPSMEL/IA
C210 N3877Y
rickf@pmafire.inel.gov
rickf@servprod.inel.gov
-- 

***** standard DISKclamer *****
personal views of my person only
From: aw1@stade.co.uk (Adrian Wontroba)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: montoring uucp connect time
Date: 27 Jan 93 12:23:05 GMT
Organization: Stade Computers Limited, UK

In article <108@eplegal.UUCP> frankb@eplegal.UUCP (Frank Brock) writes:
>we are using sco 3.2.4.  i am trying to monitor the length of time
>each uucp connection is made to each machine.

I've just installed "tua" (comp.sources.misc, v23i007-v23i011) which
summarises the statistics captured by uucp in various useful ways.

Compiling this revealed the need for the SLS lng353a. Symptom was -Ox
caused compiler errors.
-- 
Adrian Wontroba, Stade Computers Limited.	phone:	(+44) 21 373 9546
uucp:	...!uknet!stade!aw1		other: aw1%stade.co.uk@uknet.ac.uk
snail:	14 Fourlands Avenue, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, B72 1YY, UK
From: gillett@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu (Walter E. Gillett)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: HELP! Sys hangs at kernel: i/o bufs = 200k - /etc/init is present.
Date: 23 Jan 1993 02:35:25 GMT
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: rice-chex.ai.mit.edu
Keywords: Adaptec 1542 disk locks

Hi, Folks
    I think I'm in trouble!


My ODT 2.0 system won't boot!  :-(  It hangs at the

kernel: i/o bufs = 200k

message (I have 40MB of memory - does 200k sound about right?).

Anyway, I've tried the advice in the Troubleshooting reference of making sure
that /etc/init exists.  It does.  I even tried it sans args to make sure that
it can execute OK.  It does!  I can obviously boot from my Emergency Floppy
set 'cause I checked init.  So what next?  What happened?

Here's what I was up to when the problem started:
I've been running MetroLink's X server for a while but I thought I'd try SCO's
ODT server with my program to see how it'd work.  It didn't do too well so I
tried to bring my system down to single-user mode from within ODT via init s.
I guess this was a bad move 'cause I got an infinitely scrolling "single-user
password or ^D" prompt.  But I was still able to rlogin to the system so I did
and shut it down with init 0.

When I tried to reboot I got the kernel i/o bufs hang.  Sigh.  Help!
				Unhappily yours
					-Joe Shapiro
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Shapiro (NOT Walter Gillett, though I'm using his account!)
Please send replies to:                        joe@ConSolve.com
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: nigel@stonewall.demon.co.uk (Nigel Whitfield)
Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 under ODT 2.0
Organization: Jenny Agutter Fan Club
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 08:41:06 +0000

In article <1993Jan20.110804.667@step.oz.au> michael@step.oz.au (Michael O'Brien home account) writes:
>
>I presume that ODT 2.0 with Merge cannot host dos applications
>such as Windows that try to put the CPU into protected mode.
>
>Since many of the latest and best Windows applications rely
>on either Standard mode or Windows 3.1, Standard mode becomes
>quite necessary.

My understanding is that this is something that will be addressed in
a later version of Merge, but may not be available until 2.1.

Nigel.
-- 
[Nigel Whitfield                               nigel@stonewall.demon.co.uk]
[For details on the uk-motss mailing list mail uk-motss-request@pyra.co.uk]
[*****  All demon.co.uk sites are independently run internet hosts   *****]
From: corey@amiganet.chi.il.us (Corey Sweeney)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: programming termio & ioctl
Date: 26 Jan 93 21:44:55 GMT
Organization: Amiga Network Information Systems

I was wondering if anyone knows if it is possible to write something to
interface between the digiboard serial communications on my machine and the sco
reading routine wich would #1 detect parity errors and #2 send a request to the
remote machine for a resend when a parity error occurs.  (i.e. have error free
comunication between my machines :)

Thanks in advance

Corey

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Corey Sweeney
corey@amiganet.chi.il.us
I do not own a amiga!
From: jpr@jpradley.jpr.com (Jean-Pierre Radley)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: getty writing a LCK file
Date: 21 Jan 93 16:08:23 GMT
Reply-To: jpr@jpr.com
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 2097
Precedence: bulk

Kevin C. Castner writes:
> 
> I have a T2500 on a digiboard dumb 8 port card.  The modem is enabled for 
> both dial in and dial out.  Every time getty starts it creates 
> /usr/spool/uucp/LCK..tty1a and the process number in the file is the 
> pid of getty.

This is normal.

> This combination of hardware has worked fine in the past, but this problem
> showed up when I reinstalled 2.0 from scratch after losing a hard drive.
> Previous to this, I was runing ODT 1.1 and had upgraded to 2.0.
> 
> I don't suspect the hardware, but I'm willing to look at anything.
> 
> Here are the /etc/inittab entries for tty1a and tty1A
> 
> 	Se1A:23:respawn:/etc/getty -t 60  tty1A 19200
> 	Se1a:23:off:/etc/getty tty1a m
> 
> The /etc/gettydefs line:
> 
> 	19200# B19200 HUPCL OPOST ONLCR TAB3 BRKINT PARENB IXON IXANY
> 	ISTRIP ECHO ECHOE ECHOK ICANON ISIG CS7 CREAD # B19200 HUPCL
> 	OPOST ONLCR TAB3 BRKINT PARENB IXON IXANY ISTRIP ECHO ECHOE
> 	ECHOK ICANON ISIG CS7 CREAD #19200 login: #9600
> 
> Of course this is one line in the gettydefs file.
> 
> If I move real fast, I can see uuchat start and end.  The pid in the LCK 
> file is originally that of uuchat, and then changes to that of getty.
> The thing that really bothers me is that the LCK file is named LCK..tty1a
> and not tty1A where getty is running.

This is correct too. Whether you call out (say with cu) on tty1a or tty1A,
the LCK..file will use the lower-case name either way.

> This is a real problem, because I can't dial out at all without disabling
> getty first and manually removing the lock file.  It doesn't go away when
> I disable getty on the port.

Old "stale" LCK..files shouldn't matter. If the pid within the file is not
active, then it's a sign that that LCK..file can be removed and replaced with
one with a new pid.

I have 2.0 here too, and I have no problme leaving 1A enable, then dialing out
on it.

You didn't say if the dial-out is with uucp, or cu, or ...?

And what's the _first_ ACU entry for tty1a or tty1A in Devices?

-- 
Jean-Pierre Radley   Unix in NYC   jpr@jpr.com   jpradley!jpr   CIS: 72160.1341
From: fietze@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM (Roman Fietze@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM,KAG CP Development@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM, 49 711 406 2839)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: PC Unix/Xenix vendors
Date: 26 Jan 93 10:28:14 GMT
Reply-To: fietze@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM
Organization: Kodak AG, Office Imaging, Product Engineering and Development
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Return-Receipt-To: fietze@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM
Precedence: bulk

Hello Fred,

> >In article <1993Jan23.143653.25862@compu.com> fr@compu.com (Fred Rump from home) writes:
> >>A 5 user system should cost less than a 100 user system.
> 
> >why?
> 
> >the limited version required more work, ie. the code limiting it, so
> >it should cost more.
> 
> >if SCO/Esix/Concensys were giving me horsepower enabling 100 user's i could
> >understand the price bump, but there is no difference between the 2 user,
> >and the unlimited except that the 2 user version is braindamaged (must be
> >in order to limit multi-user software to the absolute minimum definition
> >of multi-user).

Why the hell does a PX UNIX running on an 386sx (I dunno who's doing
this) cost the same as the same UNIX running on a 486/66MHz. This
would be a thing I'd understand. The license policy on VAX's is done
this way.

With my experience as a software engineer there *must* be more costs
envolved in stripping down an unlimited system to two users as well as
more bugs.

For me it's just making money with the server upgrade, but maybe this
policy changes in the future. Hope so.

Roman

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Roman Fietze (Mail Code 2201)              Kodak AG Stuttgart/Germany
fietze@kagcpd01.ag01.kodak.COM                       fietze@kodak.COM
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: kgermann@zeos.com (Ken Germann)
Subject: Re: Where to find POP server
Organization: Zeos International, Ltd
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 06:40:42 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.180102.2509@ccsvax.sfasu.edu> a_millsbs@ccsvax.sfasu.edu writes:
>Where can I find a POP  server for 3.2.2 & 3.2.4 ?
>
>Also, I would be interested in talking to someone who currently runs a POP
>server on a SCO platform.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>

I am working on a port of the POP3 Mail POPPER right now. There is only
one piece left that I need help with. 

You can go FTP to dribble.c-mols.siu.edu in the pub/sco-ports/pop3 if you
would like to start from there.


>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>B. Scott Mills                            (409) 568-1363
>Computer Center -- Technical Support,     Stephen F. Austin State University
>a_millsbs@ccsvax.sfasu.edu                P.O. Box 13012 SFA Station
>root@calvin.sfasu.edu                     Nacogdoches, TX  75962
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


-- 
Ken Germann              ZZZZ EEEE  OO   SSSS   ZEOS International, Ltd.  
support@zeos.com   INET     Z E    O  O S       Technical Support Dept.
uunet!zeos!support UUCP    Z  EE   O  O  SSS    1301 Industrial Blvd. N.E.
Any opinions expressed    Z   E    O  O     S   Minneapolis, MN 55413
herein are my own!       ZZZZ EEEE  OO  SSSS    FAX         612-633-4607
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: kgermann@zeos.com (Ken Germann)
Subject: Re: Anon. ftp site for binaries ?
Organization: Zeos International, Ltd
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 09:54:51 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.181026.9287@odin.corp.sgi.com> kumar@cleaver.mti.sgi.com (Kumar Venkat) writes:
>
>Is there an anonymous ftp site that offers 
>binaries compatible with SCO Unix?
>
>I am currently interested in getting the GNU C
>compiler, but would also like to look around
>for other interesting software.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Kumar Venkat
>
>kumar@mti.sgi.com

dribble.c-mols.siu.edu

wimsey.bc.ca

anomaly (Don't know the rest sorry).



-- 
Ken Germann              ZZZZ EEEE  OO   SSSS   ZEOS International, Ltd.  
support@zeos.com   INET     Z E    O  O S       Technical Support Dept.
uunet!zeos!support UUCP    Z  EE   O  O  SSS    1301 Industrial Blvd. N.E.
Any opinions expressed    Z   E    O  O     S   Minneapolis, MN 55413
herein are my own!       ZZZZ EEEE  OO  SSSS    FAX         612-633-4607
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: Ed Cooley <edc@openage.com>
Subject: Univel Product
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 18:05:43 GMT
Precedence: bulk

I inadvertently deleted a message this morning that talked about 
a reduced cost offering for Univel product.  Does anyone have the 
prices and a phone number for Univel so that I may obtain 
additional information?  

p.s. - I am in the habit of deleting all of those bandwidth 
wasting comments fighting over PC UNIX religion.  We are in the 
service business here, and the bottom line for us means that we 
make the stuff work for the customer.  Who gives a rat's hindend 
about what does what as long as the features and functionality of 
the product is up to the task.  I must say we have fun while 
we're at it too.  It's all interesting reading, but barely worth 
the wasted time tapping on the keyboard.  

Thanks for the Univel info anybody.  Signed - usually reserved, 
but tired of deleting those mail messages.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed Cooley           12209 Bayswater Road    "An independent service and
Technical Manager   Gaithersburg, MD 20878   support provider for SCO
Open Age, Inc.      Main: 301/948-6422       products."
edc@openage.com     Fax:  301/948-9644
From: lee@dlpco.dlpco.COM (Lee Penn )
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Re: PC Unix/Xenix vendors
Date: 21 Jan 93 18:59:56 GMT
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Precedence: bulk

If the SUN Sparc is such a good deal....  What are the costs for
standard packages like Word Perfect, Lotus, etc etc in this
environment.  A business is not going to develope its own 
software.  The fact that a development environment is "free" is 
not even part of their decision. A more important one is how many 
software packages are available in the invironment AND are they 
more expensive on the SUN than on SCO.  Seems to me that Oracle 
and Informix etc are MUCH more expensive on SUN and other non 
intel based platforms.  Ditto UNIPLEX etc.

Further...  SCO's real advantage in a BUSINESS environment is 
that it is less expensive than most other MULTIUSER systems.  
Rember, most businesses will use cheap terminals to hold costs 
down or will use PC's running terminal emulation (not X windows 
either).

If you include a SUN SERVER with Multiple serial ports for 
business, what happens to the cost equation.

Finally... So what if the SUN Sparc is a great deal as a UNIX 
TOY!  Once you have developed your software under SPARC, what is 
the market for it?  Maybe it is a great tool to learn UNIX in an 
academic environment.  Fine!  But don't forget, what I and many 
others on this net are concerned with are people running Payroll 
and Order Entry for business.  The cheap Sparc is not an option 
as it turns out to not be very "cheap".

====================
shane@cs.sunysb.edu (Shane Bouslough) writes:

>fred j mccall 575-3539 (mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com) wrote:

>: Yeah, really huge cost.  Just get the Solaris sampler CD, which
>: includes a Solaris version (complete) of the GNU compiler.  Costs you
>: all of $0.

>Please tell me where I can get a CDROM drive for $0 so I can put my
>Solaris sampler CD for $0 in it. Thanks.

>: Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.

>-Shane


The exact selfsame distribution is in ftp.uu.net:/vendor/cygnus, both binary
and source tar files.

--
                                                          ___________________
  R.Stewart(Stew) Ellis, Assoc.Prof., (Off)313-762-9765  /   _____  ______ 
  Humanities & Social Science,  GMI Eng.& Mgmt. Inst.   /        / /  /  / /
  Flint, MI 48504      ellis@nova.gmi.edu              /________/ /  /  / /
================================================================================
Lee Penn,  DLP Technologies, Inc.                     Voice: 513 232-7791
SCO Advanced Product Center                           FAX: (513) 232-7801
7444 Jager Ct.
Cincinnati, OH  45230-4344                           email: lee@dlpco.COM
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
From: lee@dlpco.dlpco.COM (Lee Penn )
Subject: Re: PC Unix/Xenix vendors
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:04:31 GMT
Precedence: bulk

This reply to Fred is Totally off base!  SCO and other providers 
of UNIX using the USL source code pay a license fee for every 
copy sold.  USL provides only two options, 2 user and unlimited 
user! (or this is the environment which SCO lives with).

Thus the REAL difference to SCO is COST OF GOODS SOLD between a 2 
user license and the unlimited license.  Thus the basic reason 
for a 2 user license being less expensive than the unlimited.
==============================


>In article <1993Jan23.143653.25862@compu.com> fr@compu.com (Fred Rump from home) writes:
>>A 5 user system should cost less than a 100 user system.

>why?

>the limited version required more work, ie. the code limiting it, so
>it should cost more.

>if SCO/Esix/Concensys were giving me horsepower enabling 100 user's i could
>understand the price bump, but there is no difference between the 2 user,
>and the unlimited except that the 2 user version is braindamaged (must be
>in order to limit multi-user software to the absolute minimum definition
>of multi-user).

>-- 
>[ Jim Mercer   Reptilian Research  merce@iguana.reptiles.org  +1 416-506-0654 ]
>[                      longer life through colder blood                       ]
================================================================================
Lee Penn,  DLP Technologies, Inc.                     Voice: 513 232-7791
SCO Advanced Product Center                           FAX: (513) 232-7801
7444 Jager Ct.
Cincinnati, OH  45230-4344                           email: lee@dlpco.COM
From: karell@cs.Helsinki.FI (Esa Karell)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Good backup program for SCO
Date: 28 Jan 1993 10:29:14 +0200
Organization: University of Helsinki, Department of Computer Science
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: hydra.helsinki.fi

Does anyone know of a good backup program
for SCO that would include

-label control (Give dummy user a message,
"this is tape xyz but I want zyx")
-easy to learn menu-driven interface
-all the text on screen neatly in text
files so it could be translated
-some mechanism to tailor it (e.g.from menus 
you'd just call shell scripts and one
could change those scripts).

All suggestions will be welcome.
Are there any PD-backup programs
for SCO?

Regs,

Esa
-- 

Esa Karell karell@cs.Helsinki.FI
Tel. +358-0 513 081 /home
From: villy@uunet.uu.net (Will Hartung - Master Rallyeist)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general
Subject: Decaying SCSI Drive
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:58:33 GMT
Reply-To: me@zipbang.socal.com
Organization: [resent by] The SCOGEN gateway and Propagation Society
Resent-From: mmdf@xenitec.on.ca
Submit-To: scogen@xenitec.on.ca
Precedence: bulk

We've got a generic 486/25 with 8MB memory, an Adaptech 1742 and a
Micropolis 600MB drive. 

We recently installed ODT 1.1 on it, and it seems that every time we
do any significant activity on the file system, it gets corrupted.
We've fsck'd the heck out of this thing and it eventually comes clean
after nuking several assorted files. We've used the Adaptech utilities
to low-level the drive, and we don't have any bad blocks.

It's a pretty frustrating system to work on, to say the least. So I'm
wondering if there is any net.wisdom that may point me in a direction
to try and fix the problem!

Thanx!
Will
(me@zipbang.socal.com)
Newsgroups: biz.sco.general