HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Tuya@ccmail.uoregon.edu
Subject: Re: My Prediction of the Bill
X-Vers: University of Oregon Version dmm-02 30-Oct-90
Posted-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 17:38 EST
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 22:26:00 GMT

 txa95@isuvax.iastate.edu writes:

Who do you think you are to CCP? 

        [ Smart question.  I think they may consider me their
          "zhang3 bei4" if they like :-)]

Important chip? Give me a break. CCP has too many issues to worry about: F-16 fi
ghter to Taiwan, Trade talk, GATT,.... You said this bill is more important to C
CP than all these above?

        [ Sure, you are given the break.  But I am not CCP, so I don't 
          pretend I can judge for them what is more important.  I
          know one fact:  The CCP doesn't like this bill.  I also hope you
          realize that neither you or me hold a vote in the polibeaurau, so
          a discussion between you and me about the importance of issues
          is pretty much senseless. ]

Yes, to those who want to get their 6.4 green card, this bill is too
important. But do not think it is something to CCP, too.

         [ See the above ] 

They will not care much.  You need to beg to those US politician. Show them 
that you hate CCP and you are loyal to the US.  Show them that you can 
make some noise to help US in the Sino-US relationship. If you can convince 
them and they are in good mood, they may issue those cards to you, just like 
giving quarters to the beggars. Do not be naive enough to think you can fool 
around and get it for free.

         [ Well, you probably need to go to Mr. Zhao Haiqing's office
           and tell him this.  You might suddenly find you are not as
           silly as you thought you were before :-).
           But I doubt you can offer any idea better than what he has 
           already known.  Partly because your attitude, partly
           becasue the intelligence displayed in your message.  So be
           prepared to receive a bai2 yan3 and -- be ready to get
           verbally abused, i.e. getting a guo2 ma4 or something like
           that :-)]

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns)
Subject: Re: ROC vs PRC
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 14:50:38 GMT

In article <92Sep28.113407edt.157@orasis.vis.toronto.edu> liuyh@vis.toronto.edu  
(Yuanhui Liu) writes:
> In article <1992Sep25.212552.5149@news.acns.nwu.edu> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu  
(Usenet on news.acns) writes:
> >In article <92Sep25.144818edt.128@orasis.vis.toronto.edu>  
liuyh@vis.toronto.edu  
> >(Yuanhui Liu) writes:
> >> In article <lc6l2sINNmt4@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> stlin@stevelin.Eng.Sun.COM  
> >(Steven Lin) writes:
> >> [......] 
> >> >
> >> >These two great shows never happened in Chinese history. These two
> >> >demos ended up with two complete different results. A lot of people
> >> 
> >> The only difference is, Mr. Jiang was not alive and in charge in 1990,
> >> and unfortunately, his CCP brother comrades of his generation are still  
> >alive, 
> >> If Jiang learned some yahoos cut down his flag pole on the square, and  
make
> >> his officials look like a bunch of asses don't be surprised if he sends in 
> >> the tank and make a couple of meat pies too.  After a strong man died, 
> >> the successors of the "post-strong man" area will always look nicer, 
> >> once the same generation of people on the mainland passed away, the  
mainland 
> >> will enter the same era too.  
> >> 
> >
> >No, it is not correct. Li Peng is not very old but I bet he would be even  
worse   
> >than Jiang had he had bigger power. I think the proplem is, in PRC, people  
have  
> Li Peng is nothing but a puppet, and wind up being the scapegoat of 6.4.
> Sure he's the premier, but he had no say about the army.  Whether he
> can order machine gun hosing on his own, nobody knows, and I don't think
> anyone wants to find out.  
> 


You missed my point. What I mean is that it is not necessary the next  
generation will be better if they are educated in the CG way. 


> >been educated in a wrong way. Remember Mao said "it's a great pleasure to  
fight  
> >against the sky, the earth and people". Mainland people have been educated  
in  
> >this way and thus some of them become very cruel and inhumane. This kind of  
> >brutality occurs when Chinese troop "entered" Vietnam. I have quite some  
> >friends in the army and they told me that Chinese soldier also killed  
> >civilians. In fact, in some case, all the people in a viliage were killed  
> >because of their opposition. Any difference between Japanese soldiers in  
WWII?


Carl
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: 129.83.161.10 (H. Chao)
Subject: Re: New topic: What do you eat and how do you prepare your food?
Organization: MITRE
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 13:45:38 GMT

In article <liqiang.718326462@kramden>, liqiang@kramden.nyu.edu (Li)
writes:
> 
> Hi, H. Chao, I tried to email u but in vain.
> 
> Thanx for everything u wrote about the fish - I have saved your 5 steps into
> a file.
> 
> - Li, Qiang
> 
1) u are welcome, and I forgot to tell u how to keep kitchen clean when you
fry your food so often.  Buy a roll of alluminum foil and tape it on the
wall and hood.  When the foil getting dirty change a new one.  Easy, right!
2) u also talking about vegetable.  It is easy to.  Find a big bottle and
make your own preserved vegetable (pao4
cai4).
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: jfaung@larson.helios.nd.edu (J. Faung)
Subject: Prof. Wu Chung-Hua Passed away last week 
Reply-To: jfaung@larson.helios.nd.edu (J. Faung)
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 03:54:09 GMT



	Professor Wu Chung-Hua passed away last week
        =============================================


Professor Wu Chung-Hua, the former director of the Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, 
Chinese Academy of Sciences, passed away last week after a long battle with cancer.  

Professor Wu graduate with his PhD from MIT in 1940's, then worked in a USA. He became a full
professor when he was thirty years old. During that time, he developed the famous theory 
known as "Wu's general theory" for three dimensional toburmachinery blading problem. This 
theory made him one of the founder of modorn turbomachinery blading theory. He then came bach
to China in 50's and established the entire turbomachinery blading science in China. Under
his direction, the general theory was implement and a number of computer codes were 
developed. Those achievements were later applied in many new jet engine designs, such as 
RB211's compressor for BOEING 747.

Professor Wu's funeral will be hold next week in Beijing, PRC. His students and friends 
can send him a last respect by Fax: 861-256-1284.
From: yangze@acf3.nyu.edu (Ze Yang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
Date: 5 Oct 92 16:44:53 GMT
Organization: New York University

yidao@cae.wisc.edu (Yidao Cai) writes:

>In article <1992Oct5.144430.27532@news.acns.nwu.edu> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu 
>(Usenet on news.acns) writes:
>  
>>> 
>>Don't forget that Mao awarded so called "mather heros" in late 1950s for
>> having  
>>more than 7 children. Many Chinese were as stupid as you still are now. They  
>>simply did not question the authoritis. They simply followed their "great  
>>leeader".
>>
>>Carl

> I am just wondering WHY they did not follow their "great leader" in the 
>late 60's and early 70's.  I remember that he instructed them to have fewer
>children.

Maybe indians also followed Mao? Maybe the underclass people in
the USA also follow Mao? Former Soveit Union always encourage 
big familly, because most russian are smart (or becuse they are
stupid), and they don't follow their goverment?

Ze Yang
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: yu@chang.asd.sgi.com (Yu Chang)
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
Reply-To: yu@chang.asd.sgi.com (Yu Chang)
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 23:00:45 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.184002.15132@ms.uky.edu>, gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li)
writes:
|> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns) writes:
|> 
|> >In article <1992Oct6.171507.29459@ms.uky.edu> gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang
Li) writes:
|> >> xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
|> >> 
|> >> >>Remains of Yue4 Fei1 and Qin2 Hui4.
|> >> 
|> >> >What have this to do with Yue Fei and Qin Hui? I guess modern China
|> >> >needs neither of them.
|> >> 
|> >> Unfortunately you always have these kind of people.
|> 
|> >Yes, there are always these two kinds of people, ultra-leftests and  
|> >ultra-rightests, just like there are always beggars, prostitutes and  
|> >religiously crazy people in a society. But this does not mean these
people are  
|> >the treasure of a society.
|> 
|> >Carl
|> 
|> Then go back to China and turn down the temple of Yue Fei.

I got very confused here.
May be it was because I did not go thru culrure revolution like you guys did.
But how come Yue Fei is a ultra-(right/left)est to you?
And why he was compared to beggars, prostitutes and  religiously crazy people?

Some one please enlight me?
From: szhang@bcm.tmc.edu (Shide Zhang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: How to subscribe CND-US?
Keywords: CND-US, SUBSCRIBE
Date: 2 Oct 92 19:06:12 GMT
Organization: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tx
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcm.tmc.edu

Hi, 

Can anyone tell me how to subscribe CND-US (China News Digest-News US)?
The site and command line?

Please email me if you can help

Thanks in advance
-----
szhang@bcm.tmc.edu
From: lix@yangtze.bu.edu (Xiaowen Li)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Help need, I'm in deep trouble
Keywords: vote
Date: 30 Sep 92 01:54:42 GMT
Organization: Boston University

Many friends may not like this, but I am really in deep trouble.
I think I can kill his lower right corner, but I haven't got
chance yet. The following is an email to a friend.

Hi, William:

Thanks for invitation. Some other friends are using the
following system:

 
                 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 19
               _________________________________________
               I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I  1
               I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I  2
               I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I  3
               I . . . O . O . . . + . . . . . . . . . I  4
               I . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I  5
               I . O @ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I  6
               I . O @ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I  7
               I . @ @ O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I  8
               I . . @ . @ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I  9
               I . @ . + . . . . . + . . . . . + . . . I 10
               I . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 11
               I . . . O O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 12
               I . O O @ . . . . . . . . . . . . @ . . I 13
               I . . @ @ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 14
               I @ . @ O O . . . . O . . . @ . . . @ . I 15
               I . @ O . . . . . . + . . @   @ @ @ O . I 16
               I . @ . O . . . . . O . @ . @ O . O O . I 17
               I . . @ O . . . . . . . . . @ O . . . . I 18
               I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 19
               -----------------------------------------
You can see I am loosing:-(  I am playing black"@"

The problem is, playing by email seems having less fun than playing face
to face. You see, we reach here by nearly a week:-) When two persons
play face to face, the challenge is immediately, and one needs to respond
asap. Now, if I have some doubt, I simply go home, drink, sleep, and move
a stone when I get back. So once I forgot that I have moved a stone and
add a new one, which was caught in red-hand.

Story says that two players expelled all observers out of room. All observers
are waiting outside. But nothing can be heard after a while. Observers then
broke in finally. Guess what? One player is riding on another and trying hard
to get a stone from his mouth - because the latter wants to "regret" and
is not allowed, so he puts the stone into his mouth. But the other insists
to dig it out:-)

That is the fun we can't get from email, or can we? :-)
--
From: wling@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Place to Stay in Detroit, Michigan
Date: 1 Oct 92 00:14:58 CDT
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

Hello there,
		I am in need for a place to stay in the Detroit, Michigan
area immediately, so if there is anybody out there looking for a roomate, or
knows of anybody seeking a roomate please reply to me at

     wling@oread.cc.ukans.edu

p/s : I am grad student and is really quiet.

Thanks in Advance
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: dh5m@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Donghai  Huangfu)
Subject: Re: Pi3 Fu1's responsibility
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 20:07:07 GMT

In article <Bvpp2r.Koy@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> utingli@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Tingli Pan) writes:
>In article <9210061725.AA04680@phloem.uoregon.edu> Tuya@ccmail.uoregon.edu writes:
>>
>>          Also related to the concept of pi3 fu1 is what Gu4 Ting2
>>          Lin2 (east forest party member?  Also named gu4 yan2 wu3)
>>          said about china:
>>
>>                 Guo2 jia1 xing1 wang2, pi3 fu1 you3 ze2.
>>                 (Single men can save China)
>>
>Are you sure Pi Fu is single men. From all its usage, should be men only
>no matter married or not.
> 
>...

Pi Fu hear should be every man, or each person.

>>
>>          Tu Ya
>
>Tingli Pan
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: CURRENT FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATE IN CHINA CHANGED?
From: shaohui@oread.cc.ukans.edu
Date: 26 Sep 92 22:44:10 CDT
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Serces

IIn article <18538.2ac461ad@ecs.umass.edu>, xue@ecs.umass.edu writes:
> Anybody who heard that foreign exchange rate between China and U.S.A.
> had been raised from 5.21:1 to 9:1? This seems incredible.
> 
>Currently, the RMB to doller rate in Zhuhai Special Economical Zone is 7:1 in
black makert. The goverment has lowered the official rate twice last week. 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li)
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
    <BvGqGx.3AF@cs.psu.edu> <1992Oct2.144332.103@en.ecn.purdue.edu> 
    <1992Oct2.202924.11416@en.ecn.purdue.edu> <3OCT199209090875@rosie.uh.edu>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 22:47:59 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

mece2az@rosie.uh.edu (Sun, Xiaohua) writes:

>>Since I posted this followup. I received some criticism concerning the high-
>>lighted line.
>>Here is the clarification: I didn't mean to destroy the world. I only wanted
>>China to be able to defend itself and destroy all the possible opponents it
>>will have in the future.
>> 
>>Sorry about the bad word choices.
>> 
>>Chenwei Yan
>> 
>You are apple juice now, but you can be apple cider if you want to.

His logic is not wrong, but he is too young and not good enough to be a tough
guy. Hope he will learn how to make apple cider.
From: yu@chang.asd.sgi.com (Yu Chang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
Date: 5 Oct 92 17:34:25 GMT
Reply-To: yu@chang.asd.sgi.com (Yu Chang)
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA

In article <9227921.9439@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>, dht@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Joyous
Dave baby) writes:
|> Sorry, can someone please enlighten my history?
|> 
|> What on Earth is Oct 1 national day????
|> 
|> isn't it 10 October or 25 December???????  I'm lost.

Oct 10 is the national day celebrated by KMT in taiwan.
82 years ago on this date, Dr. Sun Yat-Shien and his revolutioners
(who became the chinese nationalists or KMT)
overthrown the Chin dynasty and build the first republic in asia.

Dec 25 is the "constitutional day" in taiwan, a holiday but not
the national day.

|> 
|> Anyway, while trying to digest all the postings (I've been away for
|> half a week... :-) ), I like to mention that, In My Opinion,
|> 
|> 1)  China needs nuclear bombs.  not for offense, but for defense.
|>    Japan is developing nuclear weapons with the help of France.
|>    N. Korea is said to have it.  Russia has it.  The 2 India's
|>    have it.  If China didn't have it, she would not be respected
|>    by neighbours.

A lot of people can accpet that argument that china needs the bombs
for self-defense. But that is not something to be proud of.
It is definite not something to symbolize the strength of the country
publicly.

|> 
|> 2)  I have a few things to say, but can't remember now... I've
|>    got other things to do...  but I would appreciate if someone
|>    explain to me what is 1 oct ???  and why do we celebrate 10/10
|>    in HK, and 25 Dec in Taiwan????????????????????????????????
|> -- 
|> 1)-----------------------Rev 6:8 "... They were given authority over
a quarter
|> of the Earth, to kill by the sword, by famine, by plague, and wild beasts."
From: hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Protection Bill
Date: 29 Sep 92 20:38:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: serval.1992Sep29.203838.9324
Organization: School of EECS, Washington State University

In article <1a9vdeINNkg6@phakt.usc.edu>, zyou@phakt.usc.edu (Zhongbai You) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep29.030719.1@cua.edu> chenx@cua.edu writes:
|> >For the discussion of the protection bill, there is always an assumption
|> >that Chinese government want these Chinese students go back to China.
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|> >My question is whether or not it is true.
|> >
|> 
|>   China does need these CSS. 
     ^^^^^^

I always think they are not the same thing.

|> 
|> The CSS in US are right in their prime time (late 20s to middle 30s). They
|> are brain power. They can bring back knowledge if not immediate profit.
|> They can at least teach and research at university, if can not make money.
|> Besides they speak English, understand West, which could make them a good 
|> representive to the West. The list can be very long.
|> 
|>   Remmember, they are young.
|> 
|>   But China will NOT force CSS return. Neither will U.S.
         ^^^^^^

|>   CCP will welcome your return if you promise working hard and not making
|> trouble.
|> 

What do you mean by working hard and not making trouble? Like a slave?

|>   At individual level, no body in China really cares about weather you
|> return or not. It is bascilly true.
|> 
|>   We can't return, because it is still unsafe, it is still potentially
|> dangerous, not because China does not need us.
			 ^^^^^^^^

China needs all her people. It needs them working hard AND `making trouble'.

|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> Z.You

H.J.
From: WWIM@MUSICB.MCGILL.CA (WWIM000)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: ~{=qHUPBNEU*R*~}
Date: 27 Sep 92 22:58:52 GMT
Organization: McGill University

zW!o    5Z6~4NJ@=g4sU=:s#,5ZR;V'HU1>2?6S@k?*1>MA80<mFRU/2N<S:MF=N,3V2?6S!##
zW!o    R;C{G01;FH3IN*!0N?028>!15D7FBI1v8>E.#,RQU}J=M(9}R;8vHU1>7(M%OrHU1>#
zW        U~8.R*GsR;G'MrT*5DEb3%!#UbJG5ZR;@}U}J=5DEb3%R*Gs!##
zW!o    4sB=SkOc8[:#IOQ2>/RrSfCq:#JB6xPN3INdW06TVE!#8[8.RQOrOc8[PB;*IgLa3v#
zW        ?9Ri!##
zW!o    DO:+W\M3B,L)S^PGFZLl8011>)7CNJ!##
zW!o    >-<CQ'<R9@<F#,5=>EH}Dj3u#,VP9zM(;uErUM=+4o5=0Y7VV.J.RTIO!#
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li)
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
    <1992Oct2.113429.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> <wangf.718052285@unixg.ubc.ca> 
    <BvJ2tB.Mw6@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 17:11:39 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:

>China has already singled itself as an target of the world because of
>its communism and its crime against civillians in 89. Why you are protecting
>Iraq? It was the aggressor. I think Iraq deserve to be punished. 

REALLY AMERICANIZED.
YOU WILL CERTAINLY PASS THE TEST TO BE A US CITIZEN.
PEOPLE WILL FORGIVE WHAT YOU DID HERE FOR A CHINESE, ACTUALLY ANOTHER US CITIZEN
TO BE.
MAY ALL YOUR RELATIVES AND FRIENDS BE US CITIZENS.
AMEN.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: dh5m@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Donghai  Huangfu)
Subject: Re: Oct 1, our National Day
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 19:58:22 GMT


>>Don't forget that Mao awarded so called "mather heros" in late 1950s for having  
>>more than 7 children. Many Chinese were as stupid as you still are now. They  

Never heard this story except a similar one on USSR.

>>simply did not question the authoritis. They simply followed their "great  
>>leeader".
>>
>>Carl
>
>
>when they began to have a relatively peaceful life it
>is imaginable that they want to have more children.  Also because
>of the low standard of living and insufficient medical facility,
>you got to have more kids to make sure that some of them would
>survive.
>
>
>Du

As I Know, Most people in countryside who want more children was trying 
to get more grain by this way (having more children) rather than to make
sure of surviving. Ren2 Ming2 Gong1 she4 distributed grain by counting
how many people per family including kids.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: liu@riogrande.cs.tcu.edu (David Liu)
Subject: Re: "Long time no see!" -- Is it Chinese?
Organization: Texas Christian University
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 17:52:09 GMT

Indeed, "long time no see" is a chinese saying.  It is said that "long time
no see" was first used by New York Times Magagazine (editorial) in 1960s.
Since then, it was wildly used.  This is told by my English teacher, FAN4
LEE4 FON1, when I was in ChiaYi High School.

DL
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: zsun@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu (Zehua Sun)
Subject: Re: "Long time no see!" -- Is it Chinese?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:46:51 GMT

In <9209262155.aa29962@Bonnie.ics.uci.edu> dzhuo@Bonnie.ICS.UCI.EDU (Dongpei 
Zhuo) writes:

>I have often heard the phrase "long time no see" recently (not by Chinese
>people). Has anybody else heard it? It sounds like a
>literal translation of Chinese "Duo1 Ri4 Bu2 Jian4" or "Hao2 Jiu3 Bu2 Jian4",
>and it does not sound pure English (grammatically). Is it Chinese at all?

>Similarly, "no problem" was not taught in any traditional English textbook
>either. Chinese say "Mei2 Wen4 Ti2" all the time, although Taiwanese don't.
>Does it come from Chinese? Or are they slang?

>Dongpei Zhuo
>University of California, Irvine

I read somewhere about LONG TIME NO SEE--it's a translation of Chinese 
expression HAO JIU BU JIAN by a western missionary to China.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,talk.politics.china
From: rzhu@math.uwaterloo.ca (Rupert Zhu)
Subject: IP number of FTP site found  (for electronic books)
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 17:46:46 GMT


Many thanks to Xiong Bo, Liu Jian, Chen Tao, Sun Yaojun, Wang Xiaofei
and several others for telling me the IP number and for teaching me the
way to obtain such information.  The following is updated information.

	Aliases: oak.oakland.edu         (by Chen Tao)
	Host: rigel.acs.oakland.edu
	Address: 141.210.10.117
	Machine: DECstation 5000
	System: Ultrix 4.2

Also thanks to Li Xiaoyu for the information about electronic books
in CD-ROM.

We are living in an information era.  I believe electronic books
will become increasingly important to our study and daily life.

Have a nice weekend, everyone!


Information Exchange
---------------------            rzhu@math.uwaterloo.ca
Rupert Zhu  (in Canada)
From: yjj@ctr.columbia.edu (Yuan Jiang)
Subject: Re:  Sino-Tibetan Relations: Prospects for the Future
Organization: The Ohio State University Department of Computer and Information Science
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 15:35:52 GMT

I typed in part of the schedule
==========
10/5
9:30:Historical perspectives, P.T. Taklha, Pema Gyalpo, Phuntsog Dekyi, Tang Daxian
11:15:Recent relations, Sonam Topgyal, Dawa Norbu, Tsering Wangyal, Zhu Jiaming
2:00Environment/economic interests, Tseten Wangchuk, Chen Yizi
3:30:Cultural&changing perceptions, Su Xiaokang, Thubten Samphel, Yin Lu-jun, Jigme Ngapo
Chen Kuide, Jamyang Norbu, Xue Haipei
6:30 Reception
10/6
9:15New world order, Zhao Suisheng, Dawa Norbu, Phuntsok Thonden, Xiang Xiaojie
10:45 Huan Guocang, Jigme Ngapo, Chen Yizi
1:30 Future, Tian Dongdong, discussion
4:45 Conclusion
6:00 Reception