HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: m0244@moncol.monmouth.edu (George McBride)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Police MCT Units
Date: 5 Jan 93 19:02:19 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Monmouth College, W. Long Branch, N.J.  07764

In article <1993Jan5.053850.9860@netcom.com> steven@netcom.com (Steven Nelson) writes:
>
>I have noticed that our local police department (San Jose PD) uses mobile
>computer terminals in all of the patrol cars.  The terminals in the cars
>are made by Motorola.  Has anybody been able to monitor the traffic  sent
>to the terminals?   If so, how?  Please excuse me if this subject has been
>asked before but I have just discovered this news group.
>
>Thanks,
>
>steven@netcom.com

Hmmmmm....I remember trying to play with the Motorola terminals.  It's sort
of Packet-Radio, but its modified or either encrypted.  We tried for quite
a while to get anything, but had no luck....

Did anybody else have any better luck?

-George
From: "derek buchler" <derek.buchler@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: another approach to f
Date: 7 Jan 93 19:18:31 EST
Reply-To: "derek buchler" <derek.buchler@channel1.com>
Distribution: alt
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

Bill,

Sorry I didn't get to answer you sooner but my boss seems to think that
work is more important than my mail :)

DB>derek.buchler@channel1.com ("derek buchler") writes:

DB>: I think that it would be illegal to do such a thing since it is illegal
DB>: to broadcast anything about police activity and law enforcement.   What
DB>: you are suggesting is the equivalant (sp?) of my radar dector going off
DB>: and then picking up my CB mike and relaying the info.  This is
DB>: definitely a no-no.

Bill Nelson writes;

BN>Hm. I wonder. It is illegal to disclose to someone else the contents of
BN>such a radio communication, or even that a communication took place.
BN>However, a radar signal is not a communication - it is a speed ranging
BN>operation. As such, radar would not be covered under the Communications
BN>Act of 1934. Nor is radar mentioned in the ECPA - as far as I know.

Interesting point.  I never thought of it that way.

BN>I know of no one who has ever been cited for such a practice.

DB>: I used to drive for a living (did repos back when I was in college) and
DB>: I can atest to the fact that it is not permited to broadcast on a
DB>: citizens band radio about police activity.  As a matter of fact, in the
DB>: back of the manual that came with my CB is states that as well.

BN>Do you still have the manual? If so, what law do they say is being
BN>violated? I can find no such information in any of my manuals.

I have printed out your message and will try and find my old manual.
If and when I find it, I'll post the part about broadcasting police
activity.


BN>: I have seen, on a few occasions where I was talking to another driver
BN>: about State Troopers and such that they were pulled over.
BN>:
BN>: On a more comical note, I was once driving through the midwest and my
BN>: radar detector went off.  I asked on my CB if anyone else's picked up
BN>: the signal.  A few drivers indicated that Yes, and others indicated No.
BN>: After a few minutes of discussing if it was a false alarm or not, the
BN>: cop came on the radio and said that we were all blind and that he was
BN>: hiding in the bushes.  He also told us that if we kept the speed under
BN>: 70 mph, he'd leave us alone. :)

BN>Hm - I wonder if someone was pulling your leg. It was my understanding
BN>that the police only minitored the frequencies - and did not transmit
BN>on them, except possibly in an emergency.

No.  No one was pulling my leg.  I have talked to cops on channel 19
quite a few time in the past.  I even once had a nice long conversation
with a NY state trooper while travelling through upstate NY in the
middle of the night.  Its a long story but if you want, I'll post it.

Derek
---
  SLMR 2.1a  It's not a bug, it's a FEATURE!
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA
From: ba562@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (James R. Lytle)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Radio Shack Service Manuals?
Date: 5 Jan 1993 00:18:27 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I went to my local Radio Shack and ask about the
availability of service manuals for their scanners. The
Radio Shack clerk/jerk told me NO! they were not available.
 
 
My Questions are:
 
What is the catalog number of the service manual for the
PRO-34 scanner?
 
What is the price of the service manual?
 
Should the local Radio Shack be able to order this for me or
do I have to order it directly from Tandy?
 
 
The local Radio Shacks seem to hire the most obnoxious
people they can. I would like to get this information so
that I can tell them EXACTLY what I want.
 
Could those of you who already have the service manuals for
their Radio Shack scanners please post those catalog
numbers? It would save those of us who would like these
service manuals a lot of time and trouble.
 
Thank You
 
jrlytle@heartland.bradley.edu
 
 
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: richard@crowded-house.den.mmc.com (Richard Armstrong)
Subject: Re: Trunking
Organization: Martin Marietta
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 22:16:22 GMT

In article <sNmNwB2w164w@k5qwb.lonestar.org> lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org (Mr. Lyn R. Kennedy) writes:
>john@newave.newave.mn.org (John A. Weeks III) writes:
>
>> In <RiciwB2w164w@k5qwb.lonestar.org> lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org (Lyn R. Kennedy):
>> > I've heard rumors that GE tells the cities that those tones are 
>> > specifically there to discourage scanners which would probably be 
>> > illegal under the FCC rules. Anybody know what other purpose they might 
>> > serve?
>> 
>> Its been a while since I played with the GE trunking radios, but as I
>> recall, tones were used because GE did not want to do a digital system
>> (it requires too much bandwidth) and there were not enough sub-audiable
>> tones available.  The GE trunking scheme allows a company to divide their
>> fleet up into groups and sub-groups.  Each group will have a different
>> combination of group ID tones.  Each individual radio can also be paged.
>> Since thousands of radios can be on a large trunking system, there needs
>> to be thousands of tone combinations available.
>
>Considering that the system has a 9600 baud control channel, it should 
>be able to do all those things like Motorola does at 3600 baud. If the 
>radios have already gone to another channel, those tones can't be 
>directed at them. Must be directed at us.


Yes, I agree; they are there to keep your scanner from proceeding to the
next channel selected.  If you use a little imagination, the tones sound
like the G.E. theme song -- "we bring good things to life"... And the tones
are always the same, so it definately isn't information being passed around
by the trunking system.  It reminds me of George Orwells' book titled 
Animal Farm.  There is no real reason to keep people from scanning normal
police operations.  If there is something sensitive, then encrypt and code
the operation like the DEA has always done with radio transmissions.


>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 
>73,            internet     | lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org
>Lyn Kennedy    packet radio | K5QWB @ N5LDD.#NTX.TX.US.NA
>               pony express | P.O. Box 5133, Ovilla, TX, USA 75154
>
>-------------- "We have met the enemy and he is us."  Pogo --------------


-- 
My company never said any of this... I didn't either.
Richard Armstrong, Software Engineer, Martin Marietta
Email->>>> richard@crowded-house.den.mmc.com <<<<-Email
From: Mike Ellerson <mellerso@uga.cc.uga.edu>
Subject: PRO-37 - FOR SALE !!!!
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A772F7ECB3010651@memac.ucns.uga.edu>
X-Xxdate: Fri, 8 Jan 93 09:20:44 GMT
Organization: University of Georgia
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d16
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 14:20:49 GMT

For Sale - PRO-37	

Handheld scanner with 200 channels, hyperscan, priority channel, etc.
Mint condition only	two months old. Purchased a 2006 and just haven't
used the unit very much. 800MHz coverage restored.

$175.00 - Firm 

I will ship.

If interested contact me via email.

Thanks.
From: lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org (Mr. Lyn R. Kennedy)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Scanner Antenna for 800Mhz
Date: 8 Jan 93 17:12:43 GMT
Organization: Radio Amateur k5qwb

craigc@hotcity.COM (Craig Cutright) writes:

> Does any one have plans, designs or ideas for a home brew scanner antenna tha
> covers the 800-1000 mhz band?

Depends on where you want to put it. I took a regular mobile gain 
antenna and mounted it on and aluminum plate. That is mounted on a pipe 
and clamped to my tower near the top. Works great. I also have a UHF TV 
antenna for the top UHF range the is a YAGI. I used the RatShak TVRO 
type pre-amp at the antenna and can get 800 MHz systems from quite a 
distance.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 
73,            internet     | lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org
Lyn Kennedy    packet radio | K5QWB @ N5LDD.#NTX.TX.US.NA
               pony express | P.O. Box 5133, Ovilla, TX, USA 75154

-------------- "We have met the enemy and he is us."  Pogo --------------
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu (Mike S.)
Subject: Re: The New Bearcat 2500XLT-D (and 8500XLT-D)
Organization: BITS, St. Louis, MO
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 02:07:32 GMT


Does anyone know if these units can be modified to be
continuous through the 800Mhz band?

Mike
-- 
mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu
From: b_cobb@hannah.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Antenna Design
Date: 8 Jan 93 13:44:38 GMT
Reply-To: b_cobb@hannah.enet.dec.com ()
Distribution: usa
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


Yes, I can confirm bad intermod on a AOR1000 with a external 
antenna.  ESPECIALLY near metro areas.  


--
Name:    Bill Cobb
E-Mail:  cobb@hannah.enet.dec.com
Phone:   508.635.8458
Address: MS DSG1-2/E6
         Digital Equipment Corporation
         4 Technology Park Drive
         Westford, MA  01886
From: cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: what is wrong with my scanner?
Date: 6 Jan 93 18:59:18 EST
Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services

urbina@novax.llnl.gov writes:

> It sounds like it locked on to the 3rd harmonic of the VDT. VDT's raster rates
> are from 50 - 75 Mhz. If you listen to your scanner while you type on your pc,
> you can actually hear the characters as they appear on the screen. 
> 
> Without going into detail this is roughly the basis for Van Eck Phreaking of
> computer monitors.
> 
> Guy
> Urbina@novax.llnl.gov
> 
-- 
That reminds me of something I saw in one of those electronics magazines.  I
remember reading about being able to actually eavesdrop on a computer.  Does
anyone know how this could be accomplished?  Not that I'm going to do it of
course....;-)

Brad Steinman
University of Toledo Computer Services
cscon0151@uoft02.utoledo.edu
From: PJB113@psuvm.psu.edu (me)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: archive where?
Date: 6 Jan 93 21:13:52 GMT
Organization: Penn State University

If you're interested in reading that article go to you're local adult
book store and pick up a HUSTLER magazine. -PJB
From: plaws@uafhp.uark.edu (Peter Laws)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Police codes
Date: 12 Jan 1993 12:05:25 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


>Listening to the scanner tonight, a police officer regarded a
>door as relatively 'P.O.E.'.  I assume he was talking about the

_P_oint _O_f _E_ntry??

>Another thing.  The local news tonight was not allowed to give
>any coverage on a 'disturbance' in a part of the city.

_Never_ let the proletariat hear what BB is doing...   8-)

>Interested, I turned on my scanner.  Almost every channel was
>just a bunch of cops saying '113a', '265b', '0055', '0057', and

Seriously, try _Monitor America_.  Or subscribe to a newsletter like
RCMA's _Journal_ or All Ohio Scan Club.  See the FAQ for addresses...

Peter


Peter Laws|GEnie:P.LAWS1|"The '90s are gonna make the '60s|plaws@uafhp.uark.edu
n5uwy@ka5bml.ar.usa.noam| look like the '50s"  --D. Hopper|plaws@uafsysb.bitnet
From: dbm@cats.njit.edu (Dean McDermott - WB2CMN)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: 800MHz Trunked Radio System Signals
Date: 6 Jan 93 07:41:54 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <9301051839.AA29656@deepthought.cs.utexas.edu> PLAWS@UAFSYSB.UARK.EDU writes:
>On 5 Jan 1993 18:10:20 GMT you said:
>>In article <1993Jan5.124700.29874@ms.uky.edu> hgpeach@ms.uky.edu (Harold Peach)
>>
>>This discussion seems to be going in circles.  For a trunked radio to
>
>I thought that was usenet's *function*...
>
>>be reprogrammed, disabled, or otherwise altered by commands being sent
>>via the control channel, it must first be able to receive those commands.
>>If the radio is not full-duplex and is in the transmit mode, it cannot receive
>>anything until it stops transmitting.  Once it stops transmitting (either
>>by a PTT button being released or a time-out feature), the controller
>>can do whatever it wants to the radio.
>
>Of course, but can't the controller tell the repeater that the radio
>(the one tx.ing) is on to just drop it?  It doesn't neccesarily have to
>tell the *radio* anything.  Just drop the repeater.  No?
>
>
>

Stop and think about this. If the repeater stops repeating the unit that is transmitting what happens to the unit? It keeps transmitting on the input! While it is transmitting their is no way the repeater can receive any other unit since the input is "blocked" by the original unit still transmitting.


Understand?


dbm@cats.njit.edu
>
>
>x
>
>Peter Laws              |"The '90s are gonna make the '60s|plaws@uafhp.uark.edu
>n5uwy@ka5bml.ar.usa.noam| look like the '50s"--D. Hopper  |plaws@uafsysb.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
Subject: Re: Scanner sex?
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 20:55:50 GMT

dgoldst@peterpan.unm.edu (Dave Goldstein) writes:
: I think this article is true, it's too wild to be anything but true.       

What is this, slogan of the month week - or something?

Bill
From: laborde@oak.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Gregory R. LaBorde)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Is there a scanner that scans like FM tuner?
Date: 11 Jan 1993 23:44:04 GMT
Organization: Reliability Engineering Section, JPL
Expires: 1/29/93
NNTP-Posting-Host: oak.jpl.nasa.gov

This is one feature of the Icm R-1 I really liked, its "sample" setting where
it pauses 10 sec on a busy channel and then proceeds, regardless of whether or
not the transmission(s) is over. I believe the top-of-the-line Icoms (7000 and
7100) do this.

-grl.
-----
From: plaws@uafhp.uark.edu (Peter Laws)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: AOR AR-3000 4 SALE
Date: 9 Jan 1993 00:48:46 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


I have an AOR AR-3000 scanning radio for sale. Covers .1 - 2036 MHz
in all modes and with great sensitivity. It has 400 memory
channels, lots of scanning modes, and RS-232 remote capability.
Comes in original package with user's manual and
schematics w.print layouts (!) . Is new $1030.-
I'm asking $700.- (negotiable). Almost never used!


Reply to Kris, W5/LA1PCA, kab2@engr.uark.edu

Posted by...

Peter Laws|GEnie:P.LAWS1|"The '90s are gonna make the '60s|plaws@uafhp.uark.edu
n5uwy@ka5bml.ar.usa.noam| look like the '50s"  --D. Hopper|plaws@uafsysb.bitnet
From: PLAWS@UAFSYSB.UARK.EDU
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: 800MHz Trunked Radio System Signals
Date: 5 Jan 1993 11:08:12 -0600
Organization: University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

On 4 Jan 93 08:07:39 GMT you said:
>puma@halcyon.com (puma) writes:
>> why CAN'T the system immediately turn over the repeater channel
>> to the emergency unit?  What difference would it make if the first
>> remote unit continued transmitting?
>
>Say it's a five-channel system and all four talk channels are in use.

But if the site controller reassigns a repeater to the guy with the
Ebutton pushed, and it "ruthlessly pre-empts" the lowest priority user,
won't it just drop that radio, transmitting or not?

Peter Laws              |"The '90s are gonna make the '60s|plaws@uafhp.uark.edu
n5uwy@ka5bml.ar.usa.noam| look like the '50s"--D. Hopper  |plaws@uafsysb.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: tedk@gagme.chi.il.us (Ted G. Kekatos)
Subject: Northern Illinois - BIG HAMFEST - JAN 31 1992
Originator: tedk@gagme
Organization: GAGME - Public Access UNIX of Chicago, Illinois, USA, Earth
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 06:16:45 GMT


Note: Please help to spread the word about this event.

-------------------------------------------------------

>>>>    Northern Illinois  - BIG HAMFEST    <<<<<

Wheaton Community Radio Amateurs (WCRA)

Sunday, Jan 31, 1992      Gates open at 8 a.m.

Odeum Expo Center, Villa Park, IL

VE Sessions, Flea Market, Commercial Tables,
Free Parking, Handicapped Accessible, Seminars.

Talk-in: 145.39- (WCRA Repeater)
         --------

Admission: At Door - $6.00,  Adv. $5.00

Contact:
Wheaton Community Radio Amateurs
P.O. Box QSL
Wheaton, IL  60189

708/629-8006   or    708/629-8889

----------------------------------------

Some WCRA members who should have advance Tickets for sale are:
 Naperville/Lisie Area:
  Mark Spieglan, 708/224-4863
  Doug Totel, 708/224-2410

----------------------------------------


Ted G. Kekatos, N9IXE
tedk@gagme.chi.il.us
708.390.0200 (w)
312.889.7401 (h)
From: gregs@hotcity.COM (Greg Stramback)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: 800MHz Trunked Radio System Signals
Date: 7 Jan 93 22:16:59 PST
Organization: BBS

In article <9301051839.AA29656@deepthought.cs.utexas.edu>,
PLAWS@UAFSYSB.UARK.EDU writes:
>On 5 Jan 1993 18:10:20 GMT you said:
>>In article <1993Jan5.124700.29874@ms.uky.edu> hgpeach@ms.uky.edu (Harold
Peach)
>
>>
>>This discussion seems to be going in circles.  For a trunked radio to
>
>I thought that was usenet's *function*...
>
>>be reprogrammed, disabled, or otherwise altered by commands being sent
>>via the control channel, it must first be able to receive those commands.
>>If the radio is not full-duplex and is in the transmit mode, it cannot
receive
>>anything until it stops transmitting.  Once it stops transmitting (either
>>by a PTT button being released or a time-out feature), the controller
>>can do whatever it wants to the radio.
>
>Of course, but can't the controller tell the repeater that the radio
>(the one tx.ing) is on to just drop it?  It doesn't neccesarily have to
>tell the *radio* anything.  Just drop the repeater.  No?
>
>
>
>
>
>x
>
>Peter Laws              |"The '90s are gonna make the
'60s|plaws@uafhp.uark.edu
>n5uwy@ka5bml.ar.usa.noam| look like the '50s"--D. Hopper 
|plaws@uafsysb.bitnet

that's what i can't remember, whether the radios in trunking systems are true
full duplex (for the data channel, so they still monitor it while transmitting)
or not.  wait, now i remember.  when an emergency button is pressed, the site
controller finds the lowest priority user, gives them a warning signal, like an
audible beep, WHILE they are transmitting, and then drops them from the system.
 the channel is then free for the unit that requested it for the emergency.

greg
From: retzer@convex.csd.uwm.edu (Joe J Retzer)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: GRE Super Converter
Date: 9 Jan 1993 01:58:41 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Reply-To: retzer@convex.csd.uwm.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.30
Originator: retzer@convex.csd.uwm.edu

Has anyone purchased a GRE super-converter (it's supposed to convert 
810-912 Mhz down to 410-512 Mhz). I am considering buying this as opposed
to getting a whole new scanner which covers the 800 Mhz band. I was
wondering how it worked however, ie. are there any drawbacks such as poorer
performance vis a vis a true 800 Mhz scanner. Any comments would be 
greatly appreciated. Many thanks in advance,
				   Joe Retzer
				   N9QXL
From: chinatti@room.Princeton.EDU (Stephen Anthony Chinatti)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Motorolla anit-scanner corldless telephones
Date: 7 Jan 93 17:40:59 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Princeton University
Originator: news@nimaster

In article <1993Jan7.173219.12236@cis.ohio-state.edu> bonk@wizard.cis.ohio-state.edu (gregory j bonk) writes:
>I have heard that in a recent issue of Nuts & Volts(sometime in 1992) that
>is a patch for radio scanners that would be able to unscramble the transmission
>from those newish cordless telephones madee by Motorolla.  If some one could 
>look this up and send me some info it would be greatly appreciated. 

Check in sci.crypt, there has been a thread on the Motorola "Secure-Clear"
cordless phones.  In short, it is a frequency inversion scheme, where the
high frequencies are mapped to the low frequencies, and vice-versa.  I'm
definitely not an expert on this, so read for yourself.

	Steve
-- 
Steve Chinatti, EMTA, EECS student, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
internet:chinatti@phoenix.Princeton.EDU     bitnet:chinatti@pucc.bitnet
From: mycal@netronix.com (Mycal)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
Subject: FM-10 FAQ 
Distribution: world
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 93 18:01:25 GMT
Organization: Netronix, Inc.


About the info packet, I have changed the price.  By putting most the
information I have in a packet it came out to 22 pages.  It cost me
$2.73 to print and send it. So I basically lost my butt on the first batch.

Anything postmarked after Jan 11 will have the following action taken:
if you send a buck you will only get the 3 amplifier plans.  Send $3 and
get the whole packet with other amp designes, BA1404-spec sheet, several
other BA-1404 based stereo broadcaster schematics, TV transmitter schematics,
and a couple pages on antennas.

Outside the US add $2(us funds only) for postage (3rd class).

Hope this doesn't cause many problems, but I gotta at least break even.

First batch of packets went out Jan 6th so you should be getting them
about the same time you read this.

slate,

mycal


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Restrictions Suck!  Information is cool.                  |
Ignore info/freedom restrictors is the rule.              |
                                                        // \\
Your Pal Mycal -- mycal@netronix.com               Look 4 Gorilla TV!
From: regnad@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Paul Prescott)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
Subject: New Years Eve and pirates
Date: 6 Jan 1993 16:04:04 GMT
Organization: The Land of Forgotten Technology
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu


For the second year in a row, New Years Eve produced an entire evening's
(and morning's) entertainment.  All of it on 7415, with the exception of
one broadcast on 7417(? my receivers are of the "antique" variety.  They
work well, but are a bit lacking in the frequency readout dept.)

Stations I heard IDs from:  Voice of Bono, Voice of Death(?),
WSKY Whiskey Radio, Jolly Roger International, WLIS We Love Interval
Signals, and WEED.  There were two more stations which either did not ID,
or else I missed it.  There was also an "intermission" of sorts, consisting
of an exchange on SSB between 3 or 4 different stations.

Now if only I could manage to find a pirate, or two during the rest of
the year.  :)


regnad@gnu.ai.mit.edu
From: adalton@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Andrew Dalton)
Subject: PIRATES
Organization: Northeastern University
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 01:04:18 GMT

WHERE HAVE ALL THE PIRATES GONE????  
I check all the time and nothing is there!!  :-(

Should I check something other than 7415???

I really want to hear some of these brave souls