From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Mitsy goes hollywood.
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 17:39:25 GMT

In article <25634@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>In article <1992Nov2.154243.20539@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>> 
>>Your posts speak for themselves. 
>
>Translation:  You argued me into a corner so I'm taking my marbles
>and going home.
 
Actually the translation is: "You are not worth the effort of going
back and searching through your petty posts". But what the hell I'll do itdippy.
 
>
>>Nothing I say is going to change that.
>>You will continue to post on various topics while always having the
>>subtle man slam. 
>
>Evidence for alleged slam never provided.  Sigh.
 
Read on you poor unfortunate victim.
 
>
>You are evidently impervious to your own prejudice.
 
Considering the source, a complement.
 
>
>Not at all, I work very hard to account for them.  I am however impervious
>to your projections and accusations.
 
As are most close minded people.
 
>
>>As you continue to post and play the martyr "Why is everybody picking on me"
>
>Actually, I'm not getting flamed at all.  In fact several long-time
>email pals have written to say "hey mysti, you never seemed to be what
>that bloke is saying you are".  
 
Email pals, yea, I just fell off the turnip truck.
Eddie the email suck up. Read on.
 
>
>>you will continue to get flamed by people. I will enjoy watching you
>>get flamed. There is no point in argueing semantics with you.
>
>You mean there is no point in arguing logically with me :)
 
Actually it means I didn't want to waste my time on an insignificant
SPELLING FLAMER. Should that have been in caps Mitsy?
 
>
>>P.S. Mitsy when shooting off a spelling flame in the future, I suggest
>>you bring a dictionary.
>
>I try to mark mispellings when I know they are occurring.  But I don't
>get all "anal" about the unimportant things in life....that's why God
 
Theirs nothing more anal then a spelling flamer.

>invented spell checkers, didn't she?
 
Ok Mitsy enjoy your regurgitated bullshit:
>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West

  Nice spell checker.
 
In article <25142@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>
>There's a big difference between expressing affection and The Public Grope.
>The childhood admonition "bring enough for yourself, bring enough for
>the class" springs to mind. ....
>
 
Mitsy projects men in a positive light once again.
 
>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West

 
In article <25146@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>Yeah, and at least one woman in the world has cried rape when non occurred.
>Doesn't mean it always, or even often, happens, does it?
>
 
It's only happened once right Mitsy?
>========================
 
>Mysti Rubert, Oaktown, California
>
>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West

 
In article <25147@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>FYI, folks who like to (try to) heap abuse on my head, Susan Faludi
>says in "Backlash" that battery by domestic partners was the number
>one cause of injury among women in the late 80's.  Put that in your
>oaseball bat and smoke it.....
>b=======================
>Mysti Rubert, Oaktown, California
>[
>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West

 
In article <25148@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>Not me, as there aren't many men who are taller than I am.  But yes,
>poor mistreated women in general, whose major source of injury in the
>late 80s in America was battery (Susan Faludi, "Backlash", introduction)
>========================
>Mysti Rubert, Oaktown, California
>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West

Mitsy tell me more about your spell checker. I love hypocrites.
 
In article <25149@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>Did I say it was bad, or wrong?  No, I just said that American men
>on average exhibit less liberal behavior than men in other countries.
>> 
 
A complement for men, eh.
 
>>  Boy absolutely the finest example ever posted of the pot calling
>>the kettle black.
>
>Are you saying I have gender-conservative ideas about women and sex?
>What exactly do you know about my ideas about women and sex, other than
>being beaten up is not my idea of fore-play?
 
Mitsy attempts to invalidate an arguement by implying that I insinuated
her idea of foreplay (the thought sickens me) is being beaten up.
 
>
>>A joy to the eye. They exhude health. They radiate. Others have been out
>>in the field to long. 
>
>Watch out, here it comes, an attack on my self-esteem based on the idea
>that women have no value other than their sexual attractiveness, therefore
>as they age they become valueless.  Can't peddle that nonsense here, bucko.
>Mysti Rubert, Oaktown, California
>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West
 
Here she attempts to indicate I have said women have no value other
then sexual attractiveness because I said some women are a joy to the eye.
Typical feminist bullshit.
 
In article <25152@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>>
>>>How fair of you mitsy. We already know where there gender fits.> 
>
>I think he mean "their".  
>========================
>Mysti Rubert, Oaktown, California
>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West
 
Love that hypocrisy. I think she mean "It's".
 
>In article <25149@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>>Oh, but you aren't really challenging what I say, you are just looking
>>for a cheap excuse to attack me, for reasons completely beyond me.
>>Ho hum.
>>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West
 
Poor Mitsy. Men attack her for no reason. Anybody catch a theme here?
 
In article <dp7p9bk@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
>In article <25147@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>>FYI, folks who like to (try to) heap abuse on my head, Susan Faludi
>>says in "Backlash" that battery by domestic partners was the number
>
>Oh yeah, hell of a source. 
>This is the same woman who said (talking about fetal alcohol syndrome)
>"Clearly it's not a great idea to be guzzling massive amounts of alcohol while
>one is pregnant", she said, but behind the "hysteria" campaign to stop
>pregnant women from drinking is an effort "to rope women in" and control them.
>
>Ms. Faludi really sounds on the ball.

Almost as much as the Ditzmeister.

In article <1992Oct30.181007.4756@PA.dec.com> ed@pa.dec.com writes:
Ed Gould Mitsy's suck up writes.
>> Actually disagree with some some people over some issues has nothing
>> to do w it. Nothing comes out of this lady's fingers that doesn't project
>> all men as assholes and all women as innocent helpless victims. Nothing.
>
>That's pure hogwash.  Mysti has offered reasoned, defensible positions
>on various issues.  The problem seems to be that her positions are
>different from those of some of the more vocal - and so far as I can
>tell, narrow-minded - men.  Those men have chosen to attack her, so as
>to undermine her arguments.
>
>violence in question is verbal, and seems to originate entirely from
>one camp, that of men who know not how to reason.  Mysti has responded
>to the violence with reason, and been rewarded with more violence.  She
>has, though, taken firm control of the moral high ground, for which I
>thank her.
>
>I - a man - do not find that her positions or her arguments denegrate
>men as a group at all, nor do they portray *any* women as helpless.
>She does characterize some men accurately, though.
>Ed Gould	  ed@pa.dec.com		Digital Equipment Corporation

So much for Ed's objectivity.
 
In article <25628@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>>Susan Faludi says lots of things that other less polemical sources
>>disagree with.
>
>Are you saying she misquoted or misrepresented the studies she quotes from?
>They have been echoed by a number of public service organizations, including
>the group which put billboards up all over (at least) Oakland, to roughly
>the same point.
>
>So are you disagreeing with the reality of the statistics or no?
>Mysti
>Mysti Rubert, Oaktown, California
>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West
 
How are those spelling flames coming along Ditz? Statistics have never
been manipulated. Mitsy charts her life by them.
 

In article <25632@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>study of the literature?  Something to compare with Susan Faludi's
>"Backlash" research (remember, she *is* a Pulitzer prize winner),
>
 
Faludi is like a godess.
 
>I have as yet to see a single example of a thorough-going analysis
>of a week's, month's or year's worth of popular media that indicates
>"male-bashing" exists at large.  
 
Maybe you should peruse your past posts.
 
>
>There aren't even "women's lib" publications filled with "male bashing".
>Unless you define all criticism as "bashing" of course!
 
Womens lib publications never male bash. Remember you heard it
from Mitz first.
 
>
>To say "there are men who beat women" is not to say that "all men
>like beating women".  I am my fellow feminists are clear on the distinction,
>Mysti Rubert, Oaktown, California
>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West
 
I think she means "and". She's so mangnanamous and always projects men in
a positive light.


In article <25633@sybase.sybase.com> mysti@sybase.com (Mysti) writes:
>
>As a user of the language, I can improvise at will :)
>
 
Most spelling flamers do.
 
>All of this is fabulously beside the point, which is there is a difference
>between saying "something about this situation isn't right" and "everybody
>who plays role 'x' in this situation is a cretin."
>And you can't provide any evidence that I've ever done the latter instead
>of the former.  Can you?
>Mysti Rubert, Oaktown, California
>"It't not the men in my life, but the life in my men."  Mae West
 
I just did cretin.
The role of the oppressed spelling flamer is always taken by a cretin.
Note the fine attention to spelling provided by Mitsy's spell checker.

 
================================================================================
 Ipsissimus of the Inner Order of Sesquipedalian Fruitcakes 
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles