From: arash@sunee.waterloo.edu (Arash Jahangir)
Subject: Re: Terrorist Khomeini regime attacks an NLA Base
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 00:30:53 GMT


In article <1992Apr8.234831.16168@watserv1.waterloo.edu> arash@sunee.waterloo.edu (Arash Jahangir) writes:
>In article <javad.702599767@nsisrv> javad@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov (Javad Boroumand;NSIUSO) writes:
>>arash@sunee.waterloo.edu (Arash Jahangir) writes:
>>
>>[... lots and lots and lots of stuff deleted]
>>
>>>I don't think I can ever
>>>hate anything as much as I hate this regime. 
>>>But if I were to come up with a
>>>second, it would be people who due to lack of competence, short-sightedness,
>>>and mindless power plays have wasted the lives of thousands of Iran's best.
>>
>>If you truly believe that these "Iran's best" are really best and you just
>>don't say that to be nice to them, then I put this question to you: What
>>makes these "best" to be best?  Would that be education wise? Professional
>>wise? Family wise? Personality wise? ... 
>>
>>I believe the "best" applies to their minds more than anything else.  They
>>were and are our best minds.  How can be these "best" follow such a
>>leadership (which you have not explicitly reffered to, but I do it for you
>>since I think that's what you mean) who is incompetent, short-sighted, and
>>mindless power player? 
>>
>>Best regards
>>
>>-- Javad
>
>Here is the bottom line.  I consider those people amongst Iran's best not
>because they joined MKO or because I think they had the minds and knew what
>was happening and what they were doing (they were very ignorant and MKO is
>a very incompetant as well as intellectually defeated organization (I don't
>mean any personal insult to you if you can't differentiate between yourself
>and MKO, well I'm sorry).  I CONSIDER THEM AMONG THE BEST ONLY BECAUSE THEY
>KNOWINGLY TOOK A CHANCE WITH DEATH SO THAT THE REST OF US MAY HAVE A BETTER
>LIFE).  Too bad, and truely sad that they died in vain.  People in Iran are
>desprate enough that they would sell their souls to the devil if he would
>assure them of the regime's overthrow.  So the early support for MKO was not
>really a support for MKO, it was a support for whoever that promised the
>fastest overthrow of the regime loudest.
>
>Secondly, I never suggested that no one should do anything because the regime
>would know its weaknesses.  What I said was that assuming that you expect to
>succeed in your attack, you must give it all you got to ensure its success.
>The so called classic gourilla warfare of 1980-1986, would have never succeeded
>Any one with little logic and common sense could tell you that.  All it caused
>was death and torture of innocent people and that too was predictable.  For
>real examples of MKO's incompetence and truely idiotic approaches I can ask
>my friend Jaleel whose brother was a former MKO and was tortured and killed
>to post here and give you a first hand view of how much class and IQ MKO 
>leaders really have. 
>
>Finally as you can see from this news-groups postings, MKO does not have a
>strong base among Iranians, which is why they won't succeed.  Personally I 
>am not sure that if instead of this regime MKO had taken over we would have
>been any better off.
>
>Arash
> 
>

P.S  My respect goes only to the ones who died prior to MKO joined forces
     with Iraqies.  I have feel nothing but disgrace and hatred for anyone
     who takes side with an enemy against his own country.  My grandmother
     used to tell us that if members of a family shed each others' blood,
     they should burry the bodies with respect.  In other words, have your
     own conflicts if you must, but against outsiders unite.  This also 
     applies to one's nation.  Too bad MKO's family did not teach them so.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian