HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Regenerations???(tardis changes)
From: HISC9016351D@LUST.LATROBE.EDU.AU (MAMMONE,Robert)
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 11:52:44 GMT
Organization: La Trobe University
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

> 
> >Well, we know there is a type of 'symbiosis' between the TARDIS and the owner 
> >(the Doctor).  Maybe the TARDIS is accomidating itself to the new regeneration
> >of the Doctor?
> 
> BZZZZZZZZZTTTT!  Error.  The Doctor just choses to remodel the TARDIS every
> so often.  Look at the Five Doctors... Peter Davidson had just completed
> the finishing touches on HIS TARDIS as this episode (about halfway into
> his episodes-or-so) began.
> 	I recall from somewhere that the TARDIS responds to the Doctor's mental
> commands; he remodels the interior either with conscious design or subconscious
> tinkering.
> 
>Well, we all know the Doctor was forever tinkering, or repairing it(the 3rd
Doctor made messing about with it a high art.  The tardis can be changed
via the Architectural Configuration Circuit (i think its a circuit).  Rooms
can be deleted and added as the Doctor sees fit.  This was seen in Logopolis
and Castrovalva.  As to the changes in the console, this can be put down
to the Doctor simply changing the layout and structure of it.  Saying that
it resonds to subconcious tinkering is going a bit far, yes? 
> 
> 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: Dave Horlick <drh2@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: TARDISy things
X-Xxdate: Fri, 20 Nov 92 15: 38:21 GMT
Nntp-Posting-User: drh2@cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell University
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d7
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:35:09 GMT

Here's another question. Are the exterior TARDIS doors distinct from the
single, large internal TARDIS door? If so, there must be a small
police-box sized space right inside the TARDIS, indicating two door sets.
If there are two sets of doors, when the console door-close button gets
pressed, does that shut the outside ones too?
In Shada the doctor's scarf gets caught in the outside door. Since both
sets of doors would have to be closed to dematerialize, I would think
that would rip the doctor's scarf apart. So maybe there's only one set.
From: 00kacohn@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Women Doctors
Date: 23 Nov 92 15:17:54 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's


     Somebody mentioned that the term "Time Lady" was never used in the show. 
Wasn't Romana II referred to by that term at one point?  (I'm thinking of the
episode in which she and T. Baker are sitting in a Parisian cafe and some
fellow sketches her with a clock in place of her own face.  Unfortunately, the
name of that series escapes me...)

Casey
From: marcs@yang.earlham.edu (Marc Seebass(Thunderbolt))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: RE: Who'd make THE BEST who???
Date: 24 Nov 92 01:57:04 GMT
 <1992Nov20.162810.20571@yang.earlham.edu> <1992Nov22.192327.15659@spang.Camosun.BC.CA>
Organization: Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana

In article <1992Nov22.192327.15659@spang.Camosun.BC.CA>, dbarker@spang.Camosun.BC.CA (Deryk Barker) writes:
> In article <1992Nov20.162810.20571@yang.earlham.edu> marcs@yang.earlham.edu (Marc Seebass(Thunderbolt)) writes:
>>In article <hnz1n2#@rpi.edu>, danaf@bray1a.its.rpi.edu (Frank R. Dana Jr.) writes:
>>> In article <1992Nov19.123723.6444@gw.wmich.edu>, 92anderson@gw.wmich.edu writes:
>>> 
>>> [speculation on the BEST next Doctor deleted...]
>>> 
>>How about Robin Williams (if he doesn't do Mork.)
> 
> I take it this is a joke?
> 
> Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept., Camosun College, Victoria B.C.
Partialy it is. But I think Robin Williams could do a good Tom-Baker style 
Doctor, but people would probably keep on thinking of him as Mork, so it 
might be a problem.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: gray@visix.com (Gray Jones)
Subject: Re:  Dr Who in DC
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:50:10 GMT
Reply-To: gray@visix.com (Gray Jones)
Organization: Visix Software, Reston, Virginia


Thanks to all who responded.

--gray
From: morgans@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Sarah-Jane, wimp or winner - you be the judge!
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:37:46 -0600
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

In article <1992Nov18.052319.14686@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>, as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (andrew david simchik) writes:
> In <1992Nov17.125938.5650@desire.wright.edu> tellenburg@desire.wright.edu writes:
> 

> Now wait one moment, and think before you reply.  Peri was kind of
> brainless, yes.....
> 
> ....but if you have the audacity, poor judge of character (if you can't
> understand Sarah Jane, best leave Falstaff alone), and sheer lack of
> observation to call Sarah Jane Smith a "nil brain", YOU HAVE A FIGHT ON YOUR
> HANDS.
> 
> And if you thought the Ace thing was bad, just you wait and see how this
> debate flames!

Oh, I do love a good debate.

I would have to agree about Peri being basically a walking sack of jello - 
they were spending more time focusing on her jiggle than anything else.

I liked Sarah-Jane at first, I guess since she was the first companion that 
I saw, as is the case for most in the US who got hooked on the TBaker 
stories.  She was SUPPOSED to be the agressive, do her own job, get the 
story do or die reporter.  After a while that became secondary.  She had 
her good moments, like not drinking the drugged wine in Brain of Morbius, 
while the Doctor chug-a-lugged, and such, but when the going got rough she 
did have her share of screaming - no it wasn't actually screaming as much 
as short gaspy hiccups.  After awhile it gets irritating.  She was a vast 
improvement on Kewpie Doll - squeeky Jo Grant.  And then the really tough 
female came along, one who could kill, clean and cook her own dinner.

Later

Siobahn (Shabang) Morgan

This isn't a good sign, I am agreeing more with Simchik.... Oh, yes we're 
both scorpians!  Which should scare the hell out of the rest of the net.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman)
Subject: Re: Who'd make a goo Who?
Organization: The Admiral's Unix System & The Grid BBS
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 01:54:06 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.125531.9593@ohm.york.ac.uk> dc@ohm.york.ac.uk (Dave Cullen) writes:
>
>   As a strong contender for a new Who, howsabout Richard O'Brien (of Rocky
>Horror fame), currently to be seen in Britain in his Crystal Maze show.

But the question is, do we want a not-exceptionally-tall, extremely gaunt, bald
doctor? 

And the answer is, no, we don't.
'

-- 
"Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ray, when somebody asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" -- Winston Zeddmore
From: perl@acsu.buffalo.edu (David T Perl)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Dracula
Date: 15 Nov 92 22:54:18 GMT
Organization: UB



	I just saw the new Dracula movie the other day and after watching it I
feel that Anthony Hopkins would make a good Doctor Who.  Has anyone else seen
it yet and agree with me?

-- 
			     ---David---
			perl@acsu.buffalo.edu
"If I knew everything that was going to happen, where would all the fun be."
		           ---The Doctor---
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: xoanon@carina.unm.edu (timothy k istian soholt)
Subject: In defense of Peri
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 18:19:25 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

Having just recently seen "Attack of the Cybermen," I'm reinforced
in my belief that Peri really wasn't all that bad. Admittedly, her
accent did come and go a little bit, and she wasn't the brightest
of the Doctor's companions, but she wasn't a complete idiot, she
was basically a kindhearted person underneath all the whining, and
almost (but not quite) all of her odd accents can be explained by
assuming that she's a New Englander who spent quite a bit of time
with a bunch of British archaeologists before joining up with the
Doctor and discovering that everyone in the galaxy except for a
few isolated groups from Earth speaks with some sort of British
accent. I know I have a tendency to adopt the accents of the peo-
ple I'm around, and I've run into several other people who do the
same.

And Peri wasn't stupid, either. She wasn't the mental giant the
Doctor was (and he seemed to enjoy rubbing her face in that fact
by making her puzzle things out for a while and then explaining
everything while she was halfway to the solution), and she had a
tendency to be a bit panicky, but she was about as swift on the 
uptake as, say, Tegan or Sarah. Besides, Jo Grant wasn't exactly 
the height of cerebration, but I haven't heard many complaints 
about her.

On the negative side, though, I have to admit that Peri was 
every bit as whiny as the sixth Doctor. I don't think that ei-
ther of them was terribly comfortable admitting that they liked
each other, so each covered it in their own form of bluster. I
can't think of a scene in which Peri demonstrates this, but the
look of devastation on the Doctor's face at the end of "Mind-
warp" (the second story in "Trial of a Time Lord") certainly 
shows that he doesn't despise Peri as much as he sometimes
seems to want everyone to think he does.

And, I will admit, that Peri was often very poorly written; I
would have liked to see her evolve the mental powers hinted at
in "Planet of Fire," and it would have been nice to see a
story that didn't have Peri trapped and helpless at some point
along the way. But I'm reasonably happy with the character as
she developed, and I'm even reasonably happy with most of the
stories she appeared in (no, I'm not happy with "Timelash" --
but at least it was better than "Delta and the Bannermen").

-- Tim Soholt (xoanon@carina.unm.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: torresce@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Carlos E. Torres)
Subject: The Doctor is...
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:43:33 GMT

In response to what someone else posted - sorry I lost the note...
I doubt Rassilon could be originally from Earth (or Omega) or anybody else from
Earth's fu ture!   First of all, the TimeLord as a race have a different 
physionomy than humans.  It is alot to accept that humans developed two hearts 
naturally!  And even if it were unnatural (artificial) - to make it hereditary 
is quite a mystery as to why they would even want to (this doesn't even include
their breathing bypass, etc...)  Besides, they are not necessariy in the 
Earth's future!  In Mawdryn Undead (yes I'm daring to bring it up again!  :) ),
the aliens/Gallifreyans (to remian neutral) have been trapped there for 3000 
years.  The transmat capsule takes them to Earth in 1976 (?) or somewhere 
around there.  Which means that the society of Timelords has existed atleast 
since BC times! And more likely Eons before!
	Mystic
(alex.soto@analog.com)

PS  I just remembered another reference...Sutek recognized what a TimeLord was,
and he had been trapped for 7000 years under the Eye of Horus.  I'm sure there
are other references to use, but my brain is fried right now!  :)

Xref: sparky rec.arts.drwho:7934 rec.arts.startrek.misc:11760 alt.startrek.creative:2472 alt.fan.q:657
From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Ace's age
Date: 20 Nov 92 20:11:26 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <!qy194@rpi.edu> danaf@rpi.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.132658.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au>, c8643631@cc.newcastle.edu.au (Mr Flibble) writes:
>|> There seems to be a misconception about Ace's age in the series.
>|> She is not 19-20.
 
>|> Ace is only 16 at the beginning of her run and 17 (maybe) in 'Survival'.
>|> That's pretty young.

>I never got that impression (that she's only aged about a year...) In fact, 
>from bits and pieces of literature I've seen through the past few years, it 
>seems that Ace is very much a "woman" by the end of the show's run so far. 
>This seems to be confirmed by some scenes in Curse of Fenric. I have been 
>under the impression that she was hovering somewhere around 20 when last we 
>saw her...

At a convention, Sophie herself said that Ace was "about 18" by the end of
Survival.  The New Adventures begin with her at 19, I think, and the last
report I can remember (one of the Cat's Cradle books, I think) puts her at 21.
From: "dale clayton" <dale.clayton@canrem.com>
Subject: dw bd
Reply-To: "dale clayton" <dale.clayton@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 23 Nov 92 19:53:11 EST

                           @                              *
 *     ___
  _____|_|_____                          *
 / Police  Box \
 |-===========-|             ____________________________
 ||_:_:_|_:_:_||            /                            \         @
 || : : | : : ||           <   HAPPY  BIRTHDAY, PROF!!    >
 ||=====|=====||            \____________________________/
 ||     |     ||                                 /
 ||     |     ||     @                  *       /
 ||=====|!====||                               /                 *
 ||     |     ||                              /
 ||     |     ||                             /       *
 ||=====|=====||                    From:   /
 ||     |     ||                    Dale Clayton  (DaleC!)
 ||_____|_____||        *           ----------------------
/_______________\                   dale.clayton@canrem.com           *

    *                                             *           :-)
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: mrmuon@next01pg2.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins)
Subject: Re: Women Doctors
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 04:27:34 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.101754.12246@bsu-ucs> 00kacohn@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu  
writes:
>      Somebody mentioned that the term "Time Lady" was never used in the  
show. 
> Wasn't Romana II referred to by that term at one point?  (I'm thinking  
of the
> episode in which she and T. Baker are sitting in a Parisian cafe and  
some
> fellow sketches her with a clock in place of her own face.   
Unfortunately, the
> name of that series escapes me...)
Indeed! It was "City of Death" in which the Doctor said "Fitting portrait  
for a time lady!"

--
Eli Hawkins : mrmuon@wam.umd.edu
From: teexijd@ioe.ac.uk (IAN DAVENPORT)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: DOCTOR WHO MOVIE & SCRIPT INFO!!!
Date: 16 Nov 92 18:19:19 GMT
Organization: Institute of Education, University of London

In <scottg.0fhg@amiganet.chi.il.us> scottg@amiganet.chi.il.us (Scott Gittlitz) writes:

>  I have transferred half of the script to ASCII for a BBS I belong to, I plan
>to finish the transfer by the end of January 93.

Any chance of posting or FTPing this? Please?

Ian J Davenport    MULLARD SPACE SCIENCE LABORATORY    ijd@uk.ac.ucl.mssl

                       "Can you _FLY_, Bobby?"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: "dale clayton" <dale.clayton@canrem.com>
Subject: dw on ytv - canada
Reply-To: "dale clayton" <dale.clayton@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 19 Nov 92 01:50:31 EST

 For those that had concerns about YTV ending DW in early '93,

 That is not going to happen. I had someone call YTV directly today and
they got a reply that they are going to continue until their contract
runs out. That will be in '94 sometime. What happens after that? Too
early to tell. Enjoy 1993.

Regards,
Dale Clayton
-----------------------
dale.clayton@canrem.com
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: ph9991_manfr@rivers.acc.uwrf.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Happy Anniversary!
Date: 23 Nov 92 12:50:17 -0600
Organization: University of Wisconsin - River Falls

In article <BSJTB8JD@cc.swarthmore.edu>, jhildeb1@cc.swarthmore.edu (Jeff Hildebrand) writes:
> mrmuon@next06csc.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins) writes:
>> I checked for the exact time in my copy of the twentieth anniversary  
>> magazine which has a picture of the original Radio Times schedule  
>> anouncement. It's 5:15 pm Greenwich meridian time, which translates, I  
>> believe, to 12:15 pm eastern standard time.
>> Pity about JFK though.
> 
> 	Except for the fact that, precisely because of JFK, the first
> episode didn't go on at 5:15. The BBC had been covering the JFK story for 24
> hours and finally went back to regular programing at 5:25. Thus the first
> episode went on the air 10 minutes late. Rather a grim piece of trivia I'm
> afraid.
> 
> 	Oh well. Happy Anniversary folks. Maybe the BBC will be smart enough
> to do a (new) special for the 30th next year.


This is wrong too, I'm afraid.
It is true transmission was delayed due to the assasination coverage,
but it was not ten minutes late, more like a minute and a half.
When Titan books issued their script book of "An Unearthly Child," they
made sure to check the transmission logs for that day and it reads
5:16: and then thirty or fortysomething seconds.  
Ten minutes was an exaggeration.

Steven.K.Manfred


> 
> -Jeff
> -- 
> Jeff Hildebrand, The Shaggy TA		       	   hildebra@math.wisc.edu
> "The following statement  is an editorial viewpoint  and does not reflect 
> the views of WSRN-FM, its employees, or mutant drosophila" - Off the Cuff
> "You can't confuse us; we're not listening to you!"  -  topology students
From: domalley@unix1.tcd.ie (Slartibartfast            (alias Daniel O'Malley))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: colin years
Date: 15 Nov 92 18:31:12 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin

In <1992Nov15.4153.14168@dosgate> daniel.bishop@canrem.com (daniel bishop) writes:

>I hate to be contrary, but there is at least an inch of the "missing
>season".  In "The Making of Doctor Who", a special which was broadcast
>on PBS oh, maybe 1984 or 5, a scene was included from "The Nightmare
>Fair" where the Sixth Doctor and Peri are on a rollercoaster. 

WHAAAAAATTTTTT???????????????????????

Impossible!!!!! The series was pulled by Michael Grade before Season 22
had finished airing... The missing season wasn't due to be made for months...
I don't know what it was you saw, but it couldn't be from TNF....
(Unless I'm seriously, seriously wrong on this, which I don't think
I am...)

Anyone?

Daniel.
--
|       //              |------Daniel O'Malley--domalley@unix1.tcd.ie------|
|   ===//  ===    ===   |---"In the beginning, the universe was created.---|
| //  // //  // //  //  |-This has made a lot of people angry and has been-|
|  ==//   ==// //  //   |--widely regarded as a bad move.":Douglas Adams.--|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Visions '92: R U Going?
From: john.ewin@pcb.batpad.lgb.ca.us (John Ewin) 
Date: 23 Nov 92 06:26:00 GMT
Reply-To: john.ewin@pcb.batpad.lgb.ca.us (John Ewin) 
Distribution: world
Organization: The Batchelor Pad PCBoard ~ Long Beach, CA ~ +1 310 494 8084

The following is for anyone going to Visions '92 in Chicago over
Thanksgiving weekend...

1>  If you're going, leave me a note with the hotel (Ramada O'Hare), and
we can meet for a soda or something!

2>  If you're a non-smoking male looking to share the cost of a room,
PLEASE leave a note at the Ramada for me, and leave me a way to contact
you.  I should have accomodations for at least 2 more folks.  (The rate
($65/night + 12% tax) would be split equally, at least 3 ways if I get
you too!)

U'NI-net Fantasy & SF Conference Host
---
 . SM 1.06 *0020 . All things are difficult before they are easy.
From: mcsdc1gs@dct.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Who'd make a goo Who?
Date: 16 Nov 92 10:52:55 GMT
Organization: Dundee Institute of Technology


	With reference to all the names who've been put forward
	regarding who'd make a goo Dr Who... personally, I'd like
	to see Sylvester McCoy continue. I'd also like to see what
	Colin Baker could do with a few half-decent scripts and a
	better costume! I think Colin would surprise quite a few people
	if he was given better material to work with.

	If none of these were possible, I think Ron Moody would make a
	good Doctor.

	But that's just my 'umble opinion...
From: CHD@HERMES.ECE.ARIZONA.EDU (Chris De Young)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: YOUR STORY
Date: 20 Nov 92 23:52:14 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: --
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

> >Interestingly enough, I have been posting my Doctor Who: ST:TNG Story

Man, everyone is writing one of those these days... I was going to post
the first part of one too (I probably still will)....

;-)

-Chris
chd@ece.arizona.edu
From: tellenburg@desire.wright.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: what got me addicted
Date: 23 Nov 92 21:23:19 EST
Organization:  Wright State University 

	I became attached to Dr. Who from countless times of staying
up late, trying to watch Space 1999.  After a while of not seeing 
Space 1999, I began watching Dr. Who.  I was only 12 and I didn't want 
go to sleep.  I am 22 now and still watching Dr. Who.  College, however,
has driven me to taping it so that I can see it and get my papers done.

	I wish I could read this more often.  I am only able to log on 
Monday through Thursday.  Therefore, I miss whatever answers you all send
to my questions.  

	I have another question.  I know Tim Curry is a wonderful actor, and
can pull off many astounding roles, but can he really pull off the part of
the Doctor?  I would rather see Sean Connery or Roger Moore.  Maybe Mel Gibson.  

	Whatever happen to the most boring war?

	Timelady Rogaenon  **** I believe in Timelady status

Time can never mend ....

Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: danaf@bray1a.its.rpi.edu (Frank R. Dana Jr.)
Subject: Re: Who'd make a goo Who?
Reply-To: danaf@rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 05:05:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.015406.27996@admiral.uucp>, dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman) writes:
|> In article <1992Nov17.125531.9593@ohm.york.ac.uk> dc@ohm.york.ac.uk (Dave Cullen) writes:
|> >
|> >   As a strong contender for a new Who, howsabout Richard O'Brien (of Rocky
|> >Horror fame), currently to be seen in Britain in his Crystal Maze show.

THAT REMINDS ME!

Tim Curry. He could pull it off. 

He'd be GREAT for the movie role. Might wear on me a little on a regular show,
but a feature film (or series of them...) would be great with TC.

|> But the question is, do we want a not-exceptionally-tall, extremely gaunt, bald
|> doctor? 
|> 
|> And the answer is, no, we don't.

"Yes, I agree with that!"

|> -- 
|> "Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
|> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|> "Ray, when somebody asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" -- Winston Zeddmore

-- 
/////////////////////////[[[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
(718)             (212)                        (516)             (518)
=======Amiuser============Frank R. Dana, Jr.============Doc Ami=======     
--------My opinions rarely reflect those of any sane person,----------
	   living, dead, or undead... that's gonna CHANGE.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: danaf@bray1a.its.rpi.edu (Frank R. Dana Jr.)
Subject: Almost missed it...
Reply-To: danaf@rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 04:59:11 GMT


HAPPY TWENTY-NINTH ANNIVERSARY, DOCTOR!!!!!!







We miss you.


                         VWOOOOORP!
                                      -Doc Ami

-- 
/////////////////////////[[[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
(718)             (212)                        (516)             (518)
=======Amiuser============Frank R. Dana, Jr.============Doc Ami=======     
--------My opinions rarely reflect those of any sane person,----------
	   living, dead, or undead... that's gonna CHANGE.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho