From: dks@MIT.EDU (dks)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Questions from a Republican woman
Date: 22 Aug 92 01:22:58 GMT
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA00899; Fri, 21 Aug 92 17:30:14 -0700
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA15964; Fri, 21 Aug 92 17:30:06 -0700
X-Received: from TMS-PORT-11.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTPid AA14450; Fri, 21 Aug 92 20:29:45 EDT
X-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle.usenet
X-Command: Send_AEvt(doAutoForward)


In article <1992Aug20.030810.13510@nntp.uoregon.edu>, Eileen Simpson writes:
> [1]
> But first, a moment of mourning for the Quayle's poor daughter, who had to
> go to high school after her mom and dad sounded off about what would happen
> if she got pg.  Could you imagine having an adolescence like this???

How much you wanna bet the poor girl runs away to Peru and
becomes a Maoist guerilla before she's sixteen?


> [2]
> When did Marilyn Q become more attractive to
> the public at large than Hillary C?

When male right-wingers discovered that intelligent women
cause impotence.  I am tempted to say that they made this
discovery the hard way, but that would be impossible.


> Dear Lord in Heaven, Marilyn is the most humorless, angry,
> power-hungry, ambitious religious-rightist campaign wife you could come up
> with.  She makes my skin crawl.  She makes the hair stand up on the back of
> my head.  She makes me shake things at my television set and shout nasty
> things at it.  She has the emotional depth of a manequin, and the
> sensitivity of a cobra.  She is not nice or fun people.

Perhaps, but she's also distracting us from the
utter incompetence of George and Dannikins.


> (And this posting is by a Republican precinct committeewoman!--but of the
> pre-religious right school.)

Since you brought it up, what's it like in your
precinct these days?  Is everyone as disgusted
with George and Dannikins as you appear to be?


> [3]
> Why does this party think it can "feed on my kind" and get my vote?

Because it's been doing the same thing for
the past twelve years?


> [4]
> [...] the baggage of Clarence Thomas v. Anita Hill;
> the abortion plank; their resistence to civil rights legislation (until the
> post-Hill era) for improved remedies for sex harassment and discrimination;
> and now they think that they can run an attack on Hillary that plays to
> peoples' underlying hostility to strong, successful--uppity--women and get
> the votes of people who support the equality of women?????

Is it your perception that the Republican Party
did "better" in these areas before George Bush
lied his way into the Oval Office?  If it is,
please let me know.  My astonishment and curiosity
are quite sincere.


> EAT LEAD AND DIE SUCKERS!!!!

They will, but only if we make 'em.
One disgusted voter at a time.


> *SNARL*  *SNARL*  *SPIT*  *SPIT*

I agree.


> "We will vote for a gerbil if necessary to get rid
>  of George Bush and Dan Quayle."  Ms. Magazine.

It may just come to that if Clinton is
not elected this time.  If Bush wins, you
can bet your last dollar that the two major
parties will turn irretrievably to the right.


Dhanesh
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections,soc.women