HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: shong@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Sang-ki Hong)
Subject: help: SLS FDISK with two hard disks
Keywords: SLS, FDISK
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 11:09:25 GMT

Hi, everyone.  I need some help regarding hard disk partitioning.

I have two hard disks (340Mb each).  The first disk (C:) is partitioned as
primary DOS for all 340Mb.  The second drive (D:) has 340Mb DOS extended
patition.

I'd like to use the first drive only for DOS, and the second only for linux.
The FDISK in SLS doesn't seem to provide a way to do this kind of setup. If 
anybody can show me how to do this, it would be greatly appreciated.  You can 
e-mail me and I'll sum up and post.  Thanks a lot in advance.

Sang-Ki Hong  (shong@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)
Dept. of Geography
The Ohio State University
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: wyvern@gnu.ai.mit.edu (The Wyvern)
Subject: X and xterm processes
Organization: Free Software Foundation
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 17:57:32 GMT

I'm currently running Linux v0.99.1 and XFree86 1.1 using the X8514
X server. When starting X (I'm using xdm) if I open an xterm from
the olvwm desktop menu, certain programs will fail when invoked from
this xterm, most notably more(1), which will display one screenfull
of a file and then exit without giving a prompt, and occasionally
kermit, which will start up normally, give the prompt, and then exit.
The only thing that seems to be different about these xterms is that
on the ps listing the control terminal is '?'. If I start an xterm
from the command line of the first xterm, the programs work fine
in the new xterm. Why does this problem occur?
From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT [BUG in 0.99] Re: [ANNOUNCE]: linux version 0.99
Keywords: kernel linux 0.99
Date: 23 Dec 92 10:16:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: life.1h9eagINNq0g
Organization: /etc/organization
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu


In article <20367@ksr.com> zdenek@ksr.com (Zdenek Radouch) writes:
>
> Also, why does the init code run in 16-bit mode?

The device drivers are not yet loaded, and it needs the BIOS to load
the kernel.

-- 
 \  /   Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu
 /\ \   PGP public key available on request.  MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted.
Scheme  White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: fmn@nevada.edu (FRANK NEEDHAM)
Subject: Ran fsck, now have problems.
Organization: University of Nevada System Computing Services
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 18:30:22 GMT

Hi all,

After reading that rebooting without doing a sync can cause problems I ran fsck
on /dev/hda2, the Linux partition. Shortly after that I noticed that when using
kermit there was no longer any input from the keboard to the screen when the
connect mode was being used, i.e, atds etc. no longer shows up on the screen,
although the various 'at' commands still work.
I decided not to mess with that at the moment as what I wanted was to get X
up so I moved on to that. I wanted to check something with Norton so I rebooted
and toggled capslock to get lilo to load dos. Lilo now is broken, it won't
accept keyboard input either. 
Will I have to do the install all over again, or is there a fix for this pro-
blem?

thanks for any help,
-frank fmn@redrock.nevada.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jburtona@cix.compulink.co.uk (John Burton)
Subject: DOS emulation
Reply-To: jburtona@cix.compulink.co.uk
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 13:00:00 +0000

DOS emulation

Rather than running a copy of MSDOS in an virual 8086, wouldn't it be 
nice to have a free dos-like operating system that was capable of
running DOS programs?

Has anyone ever thought about writing such a thing? I guess it would
be much easier that linux was to write. Is DOS sufficiently well 
documented and understood for such a thing to be written? 

If anyone has any comments (even if only to encourage me to look
further into starting such a project) please feel free to send
mail to me at jburtona@cix.compulink.co.uk

-- John Burton
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: wonge@fraser.sfu.ca (Edmund Wong)
Subject: Re: known problem with email...buy why?
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 13:35:18 GMT

In article <1992Dec31.083623.28576@r-node.gts.org> marc@r-node.gts.org (Marc Fournier - Admin) writes:
>Hi...
>
>	There is a now known problem with email, where if you do not
>create the mailbox when you create the user id, the mailbox ownership
>gets screwed up.
>
>
   [irrelevant info deleted.. also reason is I don't know anything 'bout
Smail..etc.]

>	I myself am at a loss for ideas...I've checked all the
>permissions and ownerships and nothing seems 'out of place'...except
>that it doesn't 'chown username /usr/spool/mail/username' after it
>creates the folder.
>
>Anyone?

    Actually..  I have no idea.. I had to RE-INSTALL my whole system,
and like other than the TCP/IP crap that I haven't managed to figure
out(after ALL these weeks...*sigh* and all the information I've been
given..I'm still stubborn as hell...ie. lost still..)  Anyway,
back to the situation here.  I ACTUALLY got elm working for non-root
users, but like, since I re-installed the stuff, I've completely
forgotten what I did... and quite frankly, I AIN'T 'chown username
/usr/spool/mail/username' manually FOR everyone.. sheesh... I might
as well not permit anyone to send mail.. <grin> 

   All the permissions are like, ok, from my stand point.. but
for elm's, it's a totally different matter..  in fact, as a non-root
user, if I did a 'elm -z', it would give me a "You have no permission
to read /usr/spool/mail/wonge". <whatta redundant statement..>

   HOWEVER, besides disallowing your users send mail, like I suggested,
you could always revert to 'mail'...which, for some reason, WORKS..

 Hmm... wierd..eh?  It doesn't work with elm, but it works for mail..

  ISN'T this wierd???
 
  Or am I just hallucinating everything???

 btw.. Happy New Year..


-- 
InterNet: wonge@fraser.sfu.ca  |  "Fail not; Learn Not.
                               |  It is with failing, that one learns,
                               |  So by Learning, one must fail." - Edmund Wong
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: u7917109@cc2.nctu.edu.tw ()
Subject: help ethernet card de200+
Organization: National Chiao Tung University
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 11:52:41 GMT


Hello :

    I tried to install tcpip with DE200+ card (NE2000 campatable), but 
got these debug messages :

	:	:	:	:
	:	:	:	:
	:	:	:	:
eth_if : RX transder address mismatch, 0x4904 vs. 0x490c (actual).
eth_if : RX transder address mismatch, 0x4b26 vs. 0x4b2e (actual).
eth_if : RX transder address mismatch, 0x4c04 vs. 0x4c0c (actual).
eth_if : RX transder address mismatch, 0x4e26 vs. 0x4e2e (actual).
eth_if : RX transder address mismatch, 0x4f04 vs. 0x4f0c (actual).
eth_if : RX transder address mismatch, 0x4fd2 vs. 0x4fda (actual).
eth_if : RX transder address mismatch, 0x5004 vs. 0x500c (actual).
	:	:	:	:
	:	:	:	:
	:	:	:	:

   How should I do? Modify 8390.c ? please help me !!

							RueyLin Chou
From: bob@cs.umd.edu (Bahman Adeli)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Compile problems with Xfree86-1.1
Date: 3 Jan 93 19:54:05 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742

I just upgraded to Xfree 1.1 from tsx-11.  Everytime I compile any X programs
and try to run it, it still looks for the 2.0 shared libs instead of 2.1.
I'm using gcc 2.2.2d7.  Any Ideas?

Thanks


-- 
Spoken: Bahman Adeli   UUCP: uunet!tove!bob   INTERNET:bob@cs.umd.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: nigel@gamble.uucp (Nigel Gamble)
Subject: Can't get LILO to work (even from floppy)
Keywords: LILO boot
Organization: Nigel Gamble, Consultant
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 23:38:46 GMT

No matter what I try I can't get past steps 4 and 5 in the README
file of LILO 0.7.  When I boot from the floppy on which I installed
LILO, the following characters are printed, then the system just
hangs:

LI<delta>KLILO<face>01

(<delta> and <face> are single characters, but I can't type them).

I am using Linux 0.99, and I have had no problems in building and
installing this on floppy using the default bootstrap code.

I have an Adaptec SCSI controller, and I think I have set up the
disktab file correctly.

Can anyone suggest a solution to this problem?

Thanks,
Nigel.
-- 
Nigel Gamble                                    gamble!nigel@uunet.UU.NET
Ft. Lauderdale, FL                              uunet!gamble!nigel
Xref: sparky comp.os.linux:21500 comp.windows.x:20514 comp.windows.x.i386unix:133
From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.windows.x,comp.windows.x.i386unix
Subject: Re: X Question
Date: 23 Dec 1992 01:36:41 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

koverber@cs.ulowell.edu (Kurt Overberg) writes:


>Normally, there is a startup file that gets executed when
>you run startx.  I believe the name of the file is
>'.startxrc' or something like that.  Your problem might be
>that when X starts up, all it does is start up the Xserver, 
>it dosen't start up any clients, such as xterm.

>This is a sample .startxrc

>#
># Clients started by default by startx
># The last client should NOT be started in the background.
>#
>xterm -sb  &
>exec uwm 


>					peace out.


>					   kurt
>-- 

It's called .xinitrc, and needs to be in your home directory.

James

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: riepe@ifwsn4.ifw.uni-hannover.de (Michael Riepe)
Subject: PATCH: fstat dead under 0.99.1
Reply-To: riepe@ifwsn4.ifw.uni-hannover.de
Organization: University of Hannover (Germany), IFW
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 02:19:11 GMT

In article 10582@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu, wyvern@gnu.ai.mit.edu (The Wyvern) writes:
|>The fstat/fuser programs from the ps package seem to be broken under
|>0.99.1 - an fstat gives this:
|>USER     COMMAND    PID    FD  DEV   INUM   SZ|DV MODE       NAME
|>
|>and that's it. All the other programs in the package seem to work
|>without any problems. At first I thought that ps and family
|>might just need to be recompiled, as is the case so often, but
|>recompilation didn't seem to produce any results.
|>Anyone else having this problem?

I had the same problem (BTW everything else from the ps package worked
OK for me after recompiling). The problem is that Linus moved the inode
table in 0.99.1 to fix the initialization problem (?) with 0.99 - but
that's easy to fix - if you are a "hexdump wizard" (tm) :-(. I will
include a patch (it's a quick-and-dirty Christmas hack ;-)) that should
do it (NO WARRANTY). I think you will need the 0.98 sources with 0.98.4
patches applied for that.

---------- chainsaw here -----------
diff -cr ps.old/fstat.c ps/fstat.c
*** ps.old/fstat.c	Fri Dec 25 17:04:01 1992
--- ps/fstat.c	Sat Dec 26 01:58:29 1992
***************
*** 119,125 ****
--- 119,129 ----
      }
  
      mmap_mem();
+ #if 0
      ino_table = KPTR(k_addr("_inode_table"));
+ #else			/* this change was necessary for 0.99.1 */
+     ino_table = *(struct inode **)KPTR(k_addr("_inode_table"));
+ #endif
      fil_table = KPTR(k_addr("_file_table"));
      p = KPTR(k_addr("_task"));
      for (n = NR_TASKS; n > 0; --n, ++p) {
***************
*** 186,200 ****
  {
      char *s;
      char mode[16];
!     struct inode *inop;
      int i;
      static int pid = -1;
  
!     if (!inop)
  	return;
  
      inop = KPTR(ino);
      if (inop < ino_table || inop >= ino_table + NR_INODE) {
  	if (verbose)
  	    printf("bad inode pointer\n");
  	return;
--- 190,212 ----
  {
      char *s;
      char mode[16];
!     struct inode *inop, buf;
      int i;
      static int pid = -1;
  
!     if (!ino)		/* using inop here was simply wrong, I think... */
  	return;
  
+ #if 0
      inop = KPTR(ino);
+ 
      if (inop < ino_table || inop >= ino_table + NR_INODE) {
+ #else			/* this change was necessary for 0.99.1 */
+     kmemread(&buf, ino, sizeof buf);
+     inop = &buf;
+ 
+     if (ino < ino_table || ino >= ino_table + NR_INODE) {
+ #endif
  	if (verbose)
  	    printf("bad inode pointer\n");
  	return;
---------- chainsaw here -----------

Hope this helps you,
Michael.
-- 
 Michael Riepe               <riepe@ifwsn4.ifw.uni-hannover.de>
 Universit"at Hannover
 Institut f"ur Fertigungstechnik und Spanende Werkzeugmaschinen
 Schlosswender Str. 5               W-3000 Hannover 1 (Germany)
 ...life is a sexually transmitted desease !
From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Does Linux 0.99 break bash 1.12.3?
Date: 23 Dec 1992 11:52:44 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

healyzh@iat.holonet.net (Zane H. Healy) writes:

>I just upgraded my system to 0.99 and I am now gettin some very strange
>reaction's when I try to run shell scripts.  It seem's that 0.99 broke bash.
>Has anyone had simular problem's?

>BTW I upgraded from 0.98pl1 to 0.99

>     Zane in DC
>\
>-- 

You have an older version of bash that didn't like all the changes from that 
drastic of an upgrade. You have 2 options at this point then.

1). Find a newer binary. I would try H.J's bootable rootdisk at this point.
	It should be on tsx-11.mit.edu in the pub/linux/GCC directory.

2). Recompile it yourself. You can pull down the source from any gnu mirror,
	and I can send you the context diffs that I sent off to the FSF for
	compiling it under linux.

James
From: zdenek@ksr.com (Zdenek Radouch)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT [BUG in 0.99] Re: [ANNOUNCE]: linux version 0.99
Date: 30 Dec 92 10:08:16 EST
Organization: Kendall Square Research Corp.

>For all multi-user operating systems (like Linux ;-), the operating
>system must in general initialize the memory for security reasons.
>Thus it is not time wasted.

You are right, all operating systems do that. However, this is optional,
i.e., the security is neither implicit nor always required.
The memory MUST be initialized because it is defined so by the language.
So even if it took unreasonable amount of time to initialize, that time
is not wasted because you don't have any other option.

-Z
From: Gary.Pfeffer@f1161.n261.z1.fidonet.org (Gary Pfeffer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Going Crazy
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 20:40:09 -0800

 JK > GP=>Could anybody supply me with phone numbers and any other
necessary
 JK > GP=>information needed to access tsx and the other resources for
linux
 JK > GP=>software?
 JK >  
 JK >         You'll need to be in a unix box to do that, pretty much.

 I have a big unix box at work to use.  I have installed the SLS
package
 now (98.5).  After spending almost 200 dollaros in Long Distance I
have
 A1-4, B1-6, C1-3  up and running.  Taylor UUCP is giving me a fit.
 I try to
 run it just like System V (the docs seem to agree) but I keep getting
a
 message, "Event not found".  New one on me.

 I wish I would have just done the SLS route from the beginning.  If
any
 new users are out there, pay CLOSE attention.

        Don't try to "hack" (even though we live for it).  Do yourself
a
        BIG favor and at least get A to C and install it according to
        docs.  I tried grabbing the images here, and utilies there.
        Even grabbing them from the same board was a disaster.  If you
        don't get the SLS you will most likely mismatch binaries and
        cause yourself more trouble than you want.

 Alright.  Now that I have that done I tried compiling a new image for
 use with LILO.  Much to my surprise it actually COMPILED... THE FIRST
 TIME.  One problem though.  In the make file I made modifications for
 NORMAL_VGA (that worked) and US keyboard (that didnt).  It seems that
 my punctuation keys print something other than what is on the label.
 Keep in mind I uncommented the US like for KEYBOARD and commented the
 FINNISH line which was the  uncommented in the make file.

 Any help would be appreciated.

 Other Question.

 I didn't grab the X series of SLS because the phone bill would
bankrupt
 me.  However, I grabbed XBASE1-1.ZIP and X75 .  Much to my dismay, it
 appears that you must have SUPERVGA to use Xwindows.  That would be a
 shame because a 680x480 display with a larger virtual window would
 still be very efficent.  Can someone fill me in here?  I deleted the X
 stuff for the time since it appears ir requires SVGA but the zips are
 nearby if I get the right info.

Thanks.


-/> YaleBBS v1.09c [Nov 17, 1992]
---- Yecho v1.07a
 * Origin: The Exchange BBS - (410) 529-1716 - Baltimore, MD  USA
(1:261/1161)

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: chans@cs.curtin.edu.au (Sean Chan)
Subject: Can't log in as non-root...
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 20:52:04 GMT

Gidday all,
Sorry if this question has been asked before but I can't find it, but I
can't log in as root anymore. This happened AFTER I tried symlinking
libc.so.4 to libc.so.4.2. The error I get is :-

login: sync
-sync: can't load library '/lib/libc.so.4'
       Permission denied

OR

login: user1
-bash: can't load library '/lib/libc.so.4'
       Permission denied

I've tried chowning libc.so.4 to bin.bin or root.other (currently it's
root.root) but it makes no difference. Also, once I've got libc.so.4.2
done, can I delete libc.so.4.0 and libc.so.4.1??

Thanks in advance...

Sean Chan           Curtin University of Technology 
                    Bentley, Western Australia.  
E-Mail : chans@marsh.cs.curtin.edu.au
         pchans@cc.curtin.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: richmond@sml.cs.psu.edu (Matt Richmond)
Subject: KEYBOARD_BH undefined in Linux 99.2 and various questions
Organization: Surely you jest
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 16:03:38 GMT

Hello fellow Linuxers.  I've been having a few problems which I hope
someone can help me out with.  
I've been trying to compile 99.2, but when it reaches keyboard.c,
I get an error message saying KEYBOARD_BH is undefined.  I looked
thru all the files and cannot find any other reference to this.
Has anyone else had this problem?

On a not-so-similar note, where is the 'tset' command?  I cannot
find it anywhere.  Again, has anyone else noticed this?

Another quirk I've found is copy/paste using twm in Xfree86: it
doesn't work on my setup.  Normally I'd highlight text using the
left mouse button, and then tap the right button to paste it.
It does highlight, but no paste.  I have a crappy serial
mouse that is supposed to work like an MS serial mouse.  
Any suggestions?

One more thing and I'll finish.  :)  Is it just me or are there
only 4 virtual terminals, even tho the initial login screen says
there are 8?  Anytime I push ALT-F[5-8], all I get is a blank
screen. 

If anyone can help me out with any/all of the above questions,
I'd greatly appreciate it.  Thanks much!

--Matt Richmond

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: daves@techmpc.csg.mot.com (Dave Schmitt)
Subject: SLIP available for Linux?
Organization: Motorola Cellular Subscriber Group MIS
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:05:33 GMT


I've just gotten SLS up and running, and would like to run an
X client over a modem (14.4k v.32bis/v.42bis).  The remote machine
has something called SLIP which I believe would allow me to
do this.  Is SLIP available for Linux?

Any other (better) ways to do what I want to do?

Thanks,

Dave.
-- 
David Schmitt, Manager MIS Systems		Voice: (708)538-4699
Land Mobile Products Sector			FAX:   (708)538-4638
Motorola, Inc.					Email: daves@csg.mot.com
1301 E. Algonquin Rd. (IL02 SH1), Schaumburg, IL 60196
From: johnm@PROBLEM_WITH_INEWS_GATEWAY_FILE (John Markus Bjoerndalen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Problem with 0.99 kernel booting
Date: 29 Dec 92 02:59:00 GMT
Organization: University of Tromsoe, Norway
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]

Tony Brummett (amb43790@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu) wrote:
> 
>   I finally compiled the 0.99 kernel with no major problems, except when it
> boots, after reporting all the devices it has connected, it says
> kernel panic: cannot mount root
> or something like that. I have my root filesystem as /dev/hda2. It's a 30Mb
> minix partition. I fsck'ed it and it's ok. Also, I've had no other problems
> woth any other kernel version before this. Oh, and I did change the line at
> the beginning of the makefile for the root filesystem to be /dev/hda2. 
>   So... does anyone have any idea what the problem is?
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Anthony Brummett     amb43790@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu  brummett@sparc1.cs.uiuc.edu
>                         Sample Scheme Program:
> (((((cadar '((cdr car) foo)) '(cdr car)) '(car . cadr)) '(car display error))
> (list->string (cons (caddr '(Bar Hate I)) (cons (cadr '(You Hate)) '(Scheme)))))


Are you booting from lilo ? In that case you have to reinstall lilo
after making a new kernel. (usually make lilo will do this for you. 
Or you can go to /etc/lilo and type ./install manually after 
copying the new kernel where it belongs. (= where specified in the
install script)). 

Good luck.

--
	/ John Markus Bjxrndale
Organization: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Sunday, 20 Dec 1992 23:20:03 EST
From: <ACPS7221@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: New xspread

 Hello fellow Linuxers:
  I managed to get the latest xspread to compile under Linux.  Sed does not
handle things properly.  I cheated and used my schools sed and undefed pow()
and SIGBUS.  If you don't have access to a better sed, mail me and I will send
you the two (small files) you need.
                                Michael.
 BTW the xspread available on tsx is substantially the same as this newer one.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: lukka@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Tuomas J Lukka)
Subject: Re: gcc 2.3.3
Organization: University of Helsinki
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 23:46:38 GMT

In article <1hr66bINNt25@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU> pdp@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU (Paul Douglas Page) writes:
>Hi there,
>I was wondering if anyone has tried compiling gcc 2.3.3 for linux ?
>The tar file for the source is over 7 mb long so I thought I'd check
>to see if it worked ok befor I downloaded it.

Well, my hard disk drive is chattering nicely in the background right 
now, I've gotten past stage1.

I had a problem with the SLS-ld, but will try to hack my way through
it. 

I'll post (if someone doesn't beat me to it) when it's finished.

	TJL

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: mcampbel@cs.ucf.edu (Mike Campbell )
Subject: [Q] TeX newbie questions...
Organization: University of Central Florida
Distribution: comp
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 16:04:23 GMT

I've never used TeX before, (but I *DO* know its tau epsilon chi <g>), and I'm
getting ready to start to learn it.  I have some basic assumptions I'd like to
shoot off, and someone tell me I'm right (if I am), or correct me if I'm not.

1) As I understand it, a TeX output file is *.dvi, and up to this point it's
device independent.  Then, one needs a printer driver to take the generic .dvi
file and put it to hardcopy in the desired format.  True?

2) I have a panasonic kxp1124 printer, which apparantly is not supported by the
TeX supplied w/Linux.  If I grab the source to a correct driver for this 
printer, I can compile it and use it.  Yes?  No?

3) Does EmTeX mean anything to anyone (good OR bad)?

I'd prefer a mail to this post, and I'll summarize if there's interest.

Thanks much,

Mike