From: dp
Subject: Re: Sexuality
Organization: Texas Instruments
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 20:24:58 GMT

In article <MRMIKE.92Dec31191704@michelotti.ae.ge.com>, mrmike@michelotti.ae.ge.com ("Mr. Mike" Passaretti) writes:

<stuff deleted>

|> He and I still speak, but I don't really think we could ever
|> be friends.  He may not have said he wanted them dead (He's
|> far too smart to fall into that trap), but there's not much
|> difference between that and saying you'd send them off to
|> Antarctica, now is there?  I'm still not sure what to think
|> about the Cuba bit, and the food thing is just plain stupid.

Maybe you should talk to the over 6000+ people that were exposed to
Hepatitis-A at various parties catered by a company in Texas that had a
practicing homosexual male food handler contaminate their food at several
holiday parties last month and see if they think that it's stupid.  Maybe you
should talk to the 20+ people that are still in the hospital and see if either
they or their insurance company thinks that it's stupid.

But then again, he did wash his hands and clean under his fingernails all those
other times. . .

Isn't it stupid to ignore the fact that sodomy (specifically anal/oral sex,
performed in that order) IS a public health issue.  To ignore this is a
"stupid".
 

|>                                                         - MM
|> 
|> Who thinks that you cannot love that which you refuse to be close to.
|> Holding gays at arms length and saying "I love you, but hate
|> what you are and do" isn't love, it's hypocrisy of the worst kind...

True, but so is pretending to fighting for "homosexual rights" by giving the
AIDS virus "civil rights".  I have a cousin who died last fall because of the
"civil rights" that the so-called "defenders of the gay community" were able
to win for the AIDS virus.  Sure, he chose (his words, not mine) to live the
homosexual lifestyle that eventually killed him (once again, his words),  but
the "leaders" of the gay community must accept responsibility for their
fighting against an early quarantine of those suffering from the AIDS virus.
How many people are now dead because these "leaders" fought against such a
quarantine.

As my cousin pointed out prior to his death, the so-called biological
agruments for homosexuality being a "normal" lifestyle could more easily
be used to justify that rapists, thieves, and those who practice incest
as simply practicing "alternate" lifestyles.  Indeed, drug usage and murder
could also be justified from nature.  Another interesting thing that he
pointed out was that the very same arguments used to support "alternate
lifestyles" tear down the concept of civil rights, much less equal rights. 
Remember that in the natural world animals with the power get what they want
until another animal prevents them (see there, Sadam and Adolf too have a
"natural justification" :-)).

He also would raise the question of how homosexuality fits the evolution
model.  Would homosexual male animals ever reproduce in nature?  If they did,
they would clearly be bisexual, NOT homosexual.  How could male homosexuality
have ever evolved?

It's usually at this point that people I talk to about his thoughts usually
call me a "homophobe".  Don't bother, the three paragraphs above are some of
the thoughts that my cousin shared before his death, and the first paragraph
is simply connecting information that he shared before his death with news
that I heard on a local "top-40" station this past weekend.

***  The opinions are mine (maybe), and do not necessarily represent those  ***
***  of my employer.                                                        ***
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh