HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mckeeveb@selkirk.sfu.ca (Gumby - The unknown user)
Subject: GCC won't compile on IRIX4.0.5?
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 06:16:37 GMT

Hi guys,

I've been trying to get GCC 2.2.2 to compile on an
IRIS 4D/320 running Irix 4.0.5.  It would seem that the
gcc binary (from any stage) calls 'cat' under some unknown
conditions and errors out.  Funny part is:  'cat' does not appear
anywhere within the binary in question.

Here's a segment of the output I get from make:

------------------------------------------------------
	cc -Wf,-XNg1500 -Olimit 3000 -cckr -O1    -g   -o collect2 collect2.o version.o obstack.o ` case "cc -Wf,-XNg1500 -Olimit 3000 -cckr -O1" in "cc -Wf,-XNg1500 -Olimit 3000 -cckr -O1") echo alloca.o ;; esac `  -lmld -lmalloc
	rm -f ld
	ln collect2 ld
	./gcc -dumpspecs > specs
	echo "__foo () {}" > dummy.c
	./gcc    -g -B./ -c dummy.c
cat: illegal option -- o
usage: cat -usvte [-|file] ...
	ar qc libgcc1.null dummy.o
	rm -f dummy.o dummy.c
	if [ -f libgcc2.ready ] ; then \
		true; \
	else \
		touch libgcc2.ready; \
	fi
	rm -f tmplibgcc2.a
	set -e; \
	for name in _muldi3 _divdi3 _moddi3 _udivdi3 _umoddi3 _negdi2  _lshrdi3 _lshldi3 _ashldi3 _ashrdi3   _udivmoddi4 _cmpdi2 _ucmpdi2 _floatdidf _floatdisf  _fixunsdfsi _fixunssfsi _fixunsdfdi _fixdfdi _fixunssfdi _fixsfdi  _varargs _eprintf _builtin_new _builtin_New _builtin_del  _bb _shtab _clear_cache _trampoline __main _exit; \
	do \
	  echo ${name}; \
	  ./gcc -O2    -g -B./ -g1 -G 0 -I. -I. -I./config -c -DL${name} \
	      ./libgcc2.c -o ${name}.o; \
	  if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then true; else exit 1; fi; \
	  ar rc tmplibgcc2.a ${name}.o; \
	  rm -f ${name}.o; \
	done
_muldi3
cat: illegal option -- g
usage: cat -usvte [-|file] ...
_divdi3
cat: illegal option -- g
usage: cat -usvte [-|file] ...
_moddi3
cat: illegal option -- g
usage: cat -usvte [-|file] ...
_udivdi3
cat: illegal option -- g
usage: cat -usvte [-|file] ...
_umoddi3
cat: illegal option -- g
usage: cat -usvte [-|file] ...
_negdi2
cat: illegal option -- g
usage: cat -usvte [-|file] ...
_lshrdi3
cat: illegal option -- g
usage: cat -usvte [-|file] ...
_lshldi3
cat: illegal option -- g

------------------------------------------------------------------

Any ideas?

Thanks.
-- 
    Rob McKeever  VE7ICJ  rmckeeve@sfu.ca  mckeeveb@sfu.ca  604-463-3863
"Actually, I'm a little envious of Murphy Brown.  At least she's guaranteed
of coming back this fall" - Dan Quayle, on the sitcom 'Murphy Brown'
       -*-          Standard Disclaimers should be adequate        -*-
From: rklint@cup.portal.com (Randall D Klint)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: GCC2.2.2, X11R5, on sun3, SunOS4.1: ld.so: Undefined _XtMalloc
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 17:19:33 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

I'm trying to rebuild X11R5, PL 17, on a sun3 with SunOS4.1. I selected
building of GCC2-compiled shared libraries. The whole build went fine,
with the exception of "due to size limit of variable, expression is always 1"
(which I got building GCC too) and of redeclared realloc and malloc in one
place. Now, however, most of the binaries report "ld.so: Undefined symbol:
_XtMalloc" (or other symbols, mostly XtMalloc).

Am I missing something? I never had this problem before (with GCC 1.41,
X11R5 PL8), so I assume it's due to either the newer public patches, or more
likely the README.X11 patches for GCC2.

Please respond by mail to tsarna@endicor.com (I'm using a freind's account
temporarily, and as far as I can tell portal has no way to set Followup-to
or reply-to)
Xref: sparky gnu.gcc.help:2234 comp.unix.cray:278
From: rand@plains.NoDak.edu (Douglas K. Rand)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.unix.cray
Subject: GCC and Cray X-MP - info wanted
Summary: Has anybody done any work in porting GCC to the X-MP?
Keywords: gcc Cray X-MP
Date: 2 Oct 92 05:35:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: plains.20882
Followup-To: comp.unix.cray
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

I'm trying to find out if anybody has done any work in porting
GCC to the Cray X-MP. I'm looking for a thesis topic, and this is
one of the ones that I'm considering. Any estimates (or even
guesses) as to the amount of work involved would be appreciated.

Thanks,
--
Douglas K. Rand    University of North Dakota -- Center for Aerospace Sciences
Office: +1 701 777 2814                  US Snail: Box 8216 University Station
Home:   +1 218 773 0120                            Grand Forks, ND  58202-8216
Internet: rand@plains.NoDak.Edu                    UUCP: ...!uunet!plains!rand
-- 
Douglas K. Rand    University of North Dakota -- Center for Aerospace Sciences
UNIX/VMS System Administrator                    And sleepless gradute student
Phone: +1 701 777 2814                   US Snail: Box 8216 University Station
       +1 218 773 0120                             Grand Forks, ND  58202-8216
NFS Net: rand@plains.NoDak.Edu                     UUCP: ...!uunet!plains!rand
Xref: sparky gnu.gcc.help:2235 comp.robotics:1939
From: nanders@plains.NoDak.edu (Noel Anderson)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.robotics
Subject: Re: gcc cross compiler for the 6811?
Date: 2 Oct 92 12:09:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: plains.20888
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

In article <20813@plains.NoDak.edu> nanders@plains.NoDak.edu (Noel Anderson) writes:
 
>There is no GCC port to the 6811 that I am aware of.

Just say it ain't so on the net and watch it be so.... :-)

>There are some major architectural differences between the 68xxx and 68yy
> families which make such a port non-trivial.  

Any benchmark figures on the port relative to hand assembly or commercial
compilers?  Any feature reduction from 32-bit GCC to the HC11 version is
another question I have.

The computer board looks pretty nice, independent of the compiler. 

-- 
Noel W. Anderson                   nanders@plains.nodak.edu (Internet)
Asst Prof, Computer Engineering         "I speak for myself, not NDSU"
EE Dept, North Dakota State University         nanders@plains (BITNET)
From: muenkel@tnt.uni-hannover.de (Heiko Muenkel)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: glibc-1.04 installation problems
Date: 2 Oct 92 12:38:03 GMT
Reply-To: muenkel@tnt.uni-hannover.de
Organization: Universitaet Hannover, Theoretische Nachrichtentechnik

I have problems to install the glibc-1.04 on a sun sparc station with sunos 4.1.2.
At first I run the configuration script in the top level directory of glibc-1.04
and after that the (GNU) make (Version 3.62) command. 
The 2 commands are producing the following output:

# configure sparc-sun-sunos4.1.2 --prefix=/appl/gnu/Global
Configuring the GNU C Library for `sparc-sun-sunos4.1.2'.
Using system-dependent files from directories:
unix/bsd/sun/sunos4 unix/bsd/sun/sparc unix/bsd/sun unix/bsd sparc
# make -w
make: Entering directory `/tmp_mnt/appl/gnu-source/glibc-1.04'
Makeconfig:72: extraneous text after `include'
make: sysdeps/..: Is a directory.  Stop.
make: Leaving directory `/tmp_mnt/appl/gnu-source/glibc-1.04'


Can anybody tell me what's going wrong ? 

Thanks,

Heiko
---
________________________________________________________________________________

Dipl.-Ing. Heiko Muenkel           Universitaet Hannover
				   Institut fuer Theoretische Nachrichtentechnik
				   und Informationsverarbeitung
muenkel@tnt.uni-hannover.de        Appelstrasse 9A
fax:    +49-511-762-5333           D-3000 Hannover 1
phone:  +49-511-762-5323           Germany
________________________________________________________________________________
From: brook@trillium.BOTANY.UTEXAS.EDU (Brook Milligan)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: glibc install errors
Date: 27 Sep 92 01:09:55 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Botany, Univ. of Texas, Austin


I am trying to install glibc v1.05 on a decstation 3100 running ultrix
4.2.  When I compile it using the gnu make I get a long series of
errors in different files that look like the following:

     gcc isinf.c -c -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes \
	-Wwrite-strings -g -I. -I.. -DHAVE_GNU_LD -DLIBC \
	-I../sysdeps/unix/bsd/ultrix4/mips \
	-I../sysdeps/unix/bsd/ultrix4 -I../sysdeps/unix/bsd \
	-I../sysdeps/mips -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix \
	-I../sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/generic \
	-I../sysdeps/stub -o isinf.o     
     as0: Error: isinf.c, line 1: undefined assembler operation: .stabs
	   .stabs "_isinf",11,0,0,0
     as0: Error: isinf.c, line 1: undefined assembler operation: .stabs
	  .stabs "___isinf",1,0,0,0
     as0: Error: isinf.c, line 1: malformed statement
     as0: Error: isinf.c, line 1: undefined assembler operation: .stabs
	   .stabs "_isinf",11,0,0,0
     as0: Error: isinf.c, line 1: undefined assembler operation: .stabs
	  .stabs "___isinf",1,0,0,0
     as0: Error: isinf.c, line 1: malformed statement
     make[1]: *** [isinf.o] Error 1

I am using gcc v2.0 for the compilation.  Any suggestions about this
error?  Thanks for your help.
-- 
Brook G. Milligan               Internet:  brook@trillium.botany.utexas.edu
Department of Botany            Bitnet:    bohk313@utaivc
University of Texas at Austin   UUCP:      ...!ut-emx!brook
Austin, Texas  78713   U.S.A.   (512) 471-3530  |  FAX: (512) 471-3878
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: rogerr@netcom.com (roger reynolds)
Subject: linking GCC2.2.2 compiled objs with /usr/5bin/cc problem
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 19:07:38 GMT


	Hi, 
	I just started using gcc version 2.2.2, and am having a problem
	which is this:
	
	I must link my application with /usr/5bin/cc so as to use the
	system 5 libraries. (This is an embedded SQL application using
	ORACLE, which requires sys 5 libraries to work right apparantly).

	So, I like to compile everything with gcc, then do the final 
	link with /usr/5bin/cc.  This worked fine in version 1.40

	Now, in v2.2.2, I get ___main as an undefined symbol at
	link time.

	Anybody know what I can do about this?	

	Thanks,
	rogerr@netcom.com

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: es@vat-vai.valmet.com (Esa Salonen)
Subject: Re: gcc2.2.2 on HP-UX8.0 8.0
Organization: Valmet Automation Inc., Tampere, Finland
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 07:01:14 GMT

>Is there anyone who has sucessfully installed gcc2.2.2 with debuging information 
>on an HP 9000/340 or 9000/400? I installed gas and gnu ld, but the make bombs
>when trying to compile libgcc2.c with the following messages :
> ...
>          ./gcc -O2  -I../hp-include   -B./ -g1 -I. -I. -I./config -c -DL${name}
> ...
>_muldi3
>as: warning: "" line   0: unrecognized option (-c), ignored
>as: warning: "" line   0: unrecognized option (-6), ignored
> ...
./gcc couldn't find gas, and is trying to use /bin/as. You should copy
gas in /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-hp-hpux/2.2.2/as so that gcc-2.2.2 can
find it. (Location can be different depending on your local modifications)
Same for gnu ld.

Has anybody ported bfd to this configuration ? 

It would be nice to have gdb-4.6, which uses bfd. gdb-3.5 works with gcc-2.2.2,
if you use -gstabs instead of -g, but not very well with g++.

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: mb@soldev.tti.com (Michael Bloom)
Subject: Re: HELP: gcc2.2.2, SVR3 shared libs and static data
Organization: Transaction Technology Inc.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:10:43 GMT

In article <LPC7LWD@mailgzrz.tu-berlin.de> Thomas Wolfram writes:

     Hi, I'm about to create shared X11R5 (X386 1.2E/XFree86) libraries
     for SVR3 (ISC 3.0) .... 

     I want to stick with gcc 2.2.2 and not go back to 1.40. But I don't
     want to init all unitilialized (most static) data in dozens of X source
     files only to force gcc 2.2.2 to put it to .data section.
    ...

     Does anybody know a better solution? Perhaps changing the init code
     for the target shared library? But how? 
     Or can I hope for a gcc 2.2.3 with a option "-fput-uninitialized-to-data"?

For the 386, Gcc 2.2 seems to have a "-msvr3-shlib" option.

I don't seem to have the docs describing it handly, but the code looks
as though it should do what you want.

This should probably really be a "-f" option (-fsvr3-shlib), since it
works around a generic sys5r3 problem in mkshlib that is not unique
to the 386, but also occurs on 3b2, 68k and other architectures
(unless the specific vendor has reworked mkshlib so that it's not a
problem - and nearly all have not done so).
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: tab@piis05.joanneum.ac.at (Behnam Tabatabai)
Subject: const storage class
Organization: Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 12:33:09 GMT

When compiling this code, gcc (2.2.2) produces the following warnings:

gcc -O -c test.c
test.c: In function `main':
test.c:26: warning: passing arg 1 of `foo' from incompatible pointer type

Is this a bug?

/* file test.c */

typedef float mat3[3][3];
void foo( const mat3 a, mat3 b ); /* some matrix manipulation */
void foo( const mat3 a, mat3 b)
{
  int i, j;
  
  for ( i = 0; i < 3; i++ )
    for ( j = 0; j < 3; j++ )
    {
      b[i][j] = -a[i][j];
    }
}

int main()
{
  mat3 a = {
    {1.0, 1.0, 1.0},
    {1.0, 1.0, 1.0},
    {1.0, 1.0, 1.0}
  };
  
  mat3 b;
  
  foo( a, b );
  return 1;
}
/* end of file test.c */

Thanks for any hints.
Behnam
--
Behnam Tabatabai                  | email: tab@piis05.joanneum.ac.at (internet)
                                  |        tab@piis10.joanneum.ac.at (internet)
Institute for Information Systems |        tabatabai@joanneum.ada.at (X.400)
Joanneum Research                 | tel:   (++43/316) 8020 - 241
Graz, Austria                     | fax:   (++43/316) 8020 - 181
Xref: sparky gnu.gcc.help:2231 comp.robotics:1934
From: jeff@claw.clearpoint.com (Jeffrey J. Griglack)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.robotics
Subject: Re: gcc cross compiler for the 6811?
Date: 1 Oct 92 13:49:03 GMT
	<lckpsfINNfb2@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: jeff@claw.clearpoint.com
Organization: Clearpoint Research, Hopkinton, MA

On 1 Oct 92 02:50:55 GMT, cmcmanis@pepper.Eng.Sun.COM (Chuck McManis) said:
C> NNTP-Posting-Host: pepper

C> In article <20813@plains.NoDak.edu> nanders@plains.NoDak.edu (Noel Anderson) writes:
>There is no GCC port to the 6811 that I am aware of.

C> Actually Coactive gives away a PC version of gcc that cross compiles
C> 68HC11 and the folks that did that port also have a UNIX version that
C> works but they haven't decided to distribute it yet. They'll sell you
C> a tape for $100 though.

How does one go about getting  the PC version that you say they "give
away?"  Is there an ftp sight, or do you have to contact them and have
it sent?
--

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Jeff Griglack             |"To mess about with typewriters and latch keys    |
|jeff@claw.clearpoint.com  | and call it work!"                               |
|jeff@fang.clearpoint.com  |                          -- E.M. Forster         |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: bredb@central.cis.upenn.edu (Bill Bredbenner)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: GNU tools on DG/UX
Date: 6 Oct 92 19:09:45 GMT
Organization: Human Designed Systems

Has anyone successfully compiled GCC under DG/UX?  I would appreciate knowing 
which compilation defines to set and what problems have been encountered.
Is it better to use System V defines?

Thanks in advance...

Bill Bredbenner
From: jones@bernie.sal.wisc.edu (Tom Jones)
Subject: gcc for 68XX
Organization: Space Astronomy Lab, Madison WI
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 20:38:17 GMT

I noticed renewed interest in a version of gcc for Motorola
68XX micros.  I still have a gcc configuration for the 6809
available via ananymous ftp from larry.sal.wisc.edu.  The
directory is /pub/gcc/MC6809 and it contains the usual gcc
configuaration files.  It will take some work to rewrite this
for the MC68HC11, etc. but at least you get to see an example
of a gcc cross-compiler for 8-bit Motorola micros.

I'm looking forward to my next issue of Circuit Cellar Ink.

-- Tom

-- 
Thomas E. Jones               | internet:  jones@sal.wisc.edu
UW Space Astronomy Laboratory | DECNET:    UWSAL::JONES
1150 University Avenue        |
Madison, WI 53706             | Ma Bell:    (608)263-4683
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: leisner@wrc.xerox.com ( Marty Leisner)
Subject: Cases of sun C bugs wanted which gcc doesn't have
Reply-To: leisner.henr801c@xerox.com
Organization: Xerox
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 22:36:16 GMT


After a number of years, I came across a number of bugs in the sun C compiler (sun4, sun3, sun386i)
[I believe the sun C compiler is based on pcc], which gcc didn't have.

People are amazed "There's bugs in Sun Software !! " ;-)

If possible, I'd like some examples to show them... (I never saved them, I also used
gcc whenever I can...)

--
marty
leisner.henr801c@xerox.com  
Member of the League for Programming Freedom
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: gcc 2.2.2 and chipmunk ?
From: mohan@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu (Mohan Pakkurti)
Date: 3 Oct 92 09:35:43 EST

Hi,
	I am trying to compile the Chipmunk VLSI CAD Tools from Caltech.
I get the following error during the make. Can someone please tell me of
any similar experience?


gcc -O -I../../psys/include -I/ext/X11R5/include -DLOGLIB=\"`cd ../../log/lib; pwd`\" -DF_OK=0  -target sun4 -c  log.c
gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `log.o'

Hope to hear from someone soon. :)
--mohan
-- 
===============================================================================
+ Mohanakrishna Pakkurti            + mohan@jupiter.cse.utoledo.edu           +
+ HOME: 2917 Kendale #204, Toledo OH 43606. Phone:(419)472-6936               +
===============================================================================
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: joe%joe@csesbg.co.at (Josef Leherbauer)
Subject: g++-2.2.2 on VMS and debugging
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 17:07:49 GMT


How can I display "this" in the VAX debugger ?

------------------------------------------------------
Josef Leherbauer                Phone: ++43-662-457915
takeFive Software GesmbH        Email: joe@csesbg.at
Jakob-Haringer-Str. 8
A-5020 Salzburg
Austria
------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky gnu.gcc.help:2228 comp.robotics:1929
From: cmcmanis@pepper.Eng.Sun.COM (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.robotics
Subject: Re: gcc cross compiler for the 6811?
Date: 1 Oct 1992 02:50:55 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: pepper

In article <20813@plains.NoDak.edu> nanders@plains.NoDak.edu (Noel Anderson) writes:
>There is no GCC port to the 6811 that I am aware of.

Actually Coactive gives away a PC version of gcc that cross compiles
68HC11 and the folks that did that port also have a UNIX version that
works but they haven't decided to distribute it yet. They'll sell you
a tape for $100 though.

--Chuck
--
--Chuck McManis						    Sun Microsystems
uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis   BIX: <none>   Internet: cmcmanis@Eng.Sun.COM
NIS+ Architect
These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
From: ruck@zeta.ee.ufl.edu (John R Ruckstuhl Jr)
Subject: Re: glibc-1.05, can't install (was glibc-1.05, can't make test -- gas?)
Organization: EE Dept at UF
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 19:46:26 GMT

A copy of this text has been sent to bug-glibc@prep.ai.mit.edu 


In gnu.gcc.help, I writes:

> I'm installing glibc-1.05 on a sun4c running SunOS 4.1.1
> I'm using gcc-2.2.2 and make-3.62

> > How to Install the GNU C Library
> >    Installation of the GNU C library is relatively simple.

> I configured like:
>     $ ./configure sparc-sun-sunos4.1.1 --with-gnu-ld \
>     --prefix=/usr/local --exec_prefix=/usr/local

> I make'd successfully.

??  
Maybe not.  I've got this single match to *** in my make log:
    make: *** [sysdeps/../sys/param.h] Error 1 (ignored)

Anyway, I can't even build a hello program now that this is installed.
I have to back out of /usr/local/lib/crt0.o and /usr/local/lib/libc.a
from glibc in order to do a link step.

Sigh.
Along with the one real installation issue and couple of nits, this has
grown beyond this EE's software abilities.

If you see that I just need a tiny bit of help, please email or post --
but otherwise I guess I'll just wait for glibc to evolve.  :(

Thanks for the help already from a few out there, 
    Richard Stallman for pointing me to glibc for ansi prototypes
    David D Zoo Zuhn for correcting me:  GNU ld !=
        .../lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-sunos4.1.1/2.2.2/ld
ruck


> Regarding (1):  zic is being used non-portably, and, argument to the
> remove is missing its terminating null character?
> Regarding (2):  did the installation really just terminate in the
> middle, with no explanation, or is this the normal termination point and 
> the error reported here is just an exit message reflecting error (1).

> The making of the libraries (prior to installation) requires the make'r
> to have . on the path, because some of the things executed during a
> build don't have path-qualified names.
> This isn't too difficult to figure out after seeing the failed make, but
> ideally this shouldn't happen.
-- 
John R. Ruckstuhl, Jr.                  ruck@alpha.ee.ufl.edu
Dept of Electrical Engineering          ruck@cis.ufl.edu, uflorida!ruck
University of Florida                   ruck%sphere@cis.ufl.edu, sphere!ruck
From: ks37+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kurt Jurgen Schaefer)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: libg++ docs.
Date: 30 Sep 92 20:59:45 GMT
Organization: Fifth yr. senior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

I'm looking for a useable printable version of the Libg++ Manual.
I can get various info using emacs, but I want to print out a physical
manual.  Is there a different one avaliable, or is there a good way to
print out the emacs info files so that they're fairly usable?

     Thanks!
        -Kurt

PS Send responces to me, I don't read this board that often. :)  Thanks!
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.sys.amiga.tech
From: carson@cs.columbia.edu (Carson A. Gaspar)
Subject: Cross-compiling host=sparc, target=amiga with gcc 2.2.2 - is it possible?
Organization: Columbia University Department of Computer Science
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 17:41:56 GMT


Has this been done?  If yes, how? If not, then is it possible with a
reasonable amount of effort?

I'd settle for producing object files and linking on an amiga, but
would much rather be able to produce an executable directly.

-- 
			    Carson Gaspar
			carson@cs.columbia.edu
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.robotics
From: ron@empire.cce.cornell.edu (Ron Pool)
Subject: Re: gcc cross compiler for the 6811?
Organization: Cornell Cooperative Extension
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 00:51:00 GMT

John 'MacGyver' Richardson (jrichard@cs.ulowell.edu) wrote:
: 	Does anyone know if there is a gcc cross compiler for the 6811
: (this is the CPU used by Fred Martin's miniboard 2.0 discussed in 
: comp.robotics).  

I just received the latest issue of Circuit Cellar Ink today.  On page 7
in the new products section the GCB11 68HC11F1 based SBC was announced.
The SBC comes with a port of GNU C for the 6811 with DOS as the host
environment for the cross compiler.  Complete source is supposedly
supplied (I interpret this to include source for GNU C).  No mention is
made of which version of GNU C is supplied.  The price for the SBC with
all software (including GNU C) is listed as having a price of $179
(presumably in single quantities).

I'm thinking of getting this SBC just to get the port of GNU C.  Thanks
to the GPL, even if they don't supply source for GNU C, I'll still be
able to get it from them (in theory).

The company selling this is Coactive Asthetics, Inc.; P.O. Box #425967;
San Francisco, CA 94142; Voice: 415-626-5152; FAX: 415-626-6320.

Hopefully the 6811 bits will get rolled back into the standard distribution
of GNU C at some point.
-- 
--
Ron Pool; Electronic Technology Group; B-15 Wing Hall; Ithaca, NY 14853
Internet: ron_p@cce.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help