HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 18:44:33 EDT
From: Greg Fazzaro <GJF106@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Win3.1 info needed

I need some help. I have to do proposal paper for my english paper here at PSU.
 I am doing it on whether someone looking to upgrade from DOS should get
Windows 3.1 or OS/2 2.0. The paper will deal with power, ease-of-use, user-
friendliness, hardware requirements. The user will be an average engineering
college student. Please e-mail me your comments on Windows 3.1 (nothing on NT
please), why you like it, what it does for you, etc. Also, does anyone know the
 number for Microsoft where I can get product literature? If you can't e-mail,
please post a response to this article. I would like this information ASAP, but
 the paper isn't do for 1.5 months.


                                                Thanks is advance,


                                                 Greg
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: jejones@microware.com (James Jones)
Subject: Re: Essence of flame
Organization: Microware Systems Corp., Des Moines, Iowa
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:18:19 GMT

In article <1b804qINNn36@pollux.usc.edu> addison@pollux.usc.edu (Richard Addison) writes:
>AmigaWorld      AmigaWhirled
>InfoWorld       InfoWhirled
>[A-Za-z]*World  [A-Za-z]*Whirled

<fill in blank> Journal	<fill in blank> Urinal

	James Jones

(Opinions expressed here may not even be those of the author, much less those
of any organization.)
Xref: sparky comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:2395 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:1335 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:26214 comp.sys.next.advocacy:2601
From: dspascha@eos.ncsu.edu (DAVID SCOTT PASCHAL)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.next.advocacy
Subject: Re: Essence of flame
Date: 8 Oct 92 18:22:33 GMT
Reply-To: dspascha@eos.ncsu.edu (DAVID SCOTT PASCHAL)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Originator: dspascha@c00578-1403br.eos.ncsu.edu


Hi.  How about this: "Tandy -- We reverse engineered it!"

(as a takeoff of their magazine adds with the slogan "We engineered it!")

Tschuess,
David Paschal
Xref: sparky comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:2394 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:1334 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:26211 comp.sys.next.advocacy:2600
From: fettig@disco-sun4 (Thomas &)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.next.advocacy
Subject: Re: Essence of flame
Date: 8 Oct 92 17:31:37 GMT
Organization: DFKI - German Research Center for AI
NNTP-Posting-Host: gs-serv1.dfki.uni-sb.de
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Lars Peter Fischer (fischer@iesd.auc.dk) wrote:
: 
: >>>>> "Paul" == Paul S Secinaro (pss1@kepler.unh.edu)
: 
: Paul> Anyone here any good ones for Atari products?  How about NeXT, Sun, etc?

Atari? You wanted to say Safari, didn't you ? :)

: 
: Back when there was all the fuss about the up an coming NeXT machine
: and the release was being postponed again and again, I saw a T-shirt
: with "NeVR" printed on it.
: 
: /Lars
: --
: Lars Fischer, fischer@iesd.auc.dk | It takes an uncommon mind to think of
: CS Dept., Aalborg Univ., DENMARK. | these things.  -- Calvin

==============================================================================
Thomas Fettig // Dekan-Albrecht 10 // 6653 Blieskastel // 06842-2249
 	fettig@dfki.uni-sb.de fettig@cs.uni-sb.de
  History is an Angel being blown backwards into the Future. 
==============================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Essence of flame
From: bob@nutmeg.ntu.edu.au (Robert Watkins)
Date: 8 Oct 92 23:44:55 +0900
Distribution: world
Organization: Information Technology, Northern Territory University

I've always liked messy-dos myself
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.next.advocacy
From: mdw@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (mark.d.wuest)
Subject: Re: Essence of flame
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 19:43:16 GMT

In article <1b804qINNn36@pollux.usc.edu> addison@pollux.usc.edu (Richard Addison) writes:
>AmigaWorld      AmigaWhirled
>InfoWorld       InfoWhirled
>[A-Za-z]*World  [A-Za-z]*Whirled

Shouldn't that be [A-Za-z]*Hurled?  ;-)

(As in Wayne's Hurled).

Mark
-- 
Mark Wuest                            *MY* opinions, not AT&T's!!
mark.wuest@att.com
mdw@cheshire.att.com (NeXT Mail)
Xref: sparky comp.os.ms-windows.setup:1648 comp.os.ms-windows.misc:3826
From: DHBHM@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu (Bruce H. McIntosh)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.ms-windows.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: How to start in 386 enhanced mode ?
Date: 14 Oct 92 18:50:50 GMT
Followup-To: comp.windows.ms
Organization: University of Florida, NERDC

In article <1992Oct5.194224.25247@sj.ate.slb.com>
poffen@rushmore (Russ Poffenberger) writes:
>ent197g@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Tony Chin) writes:
>: In article <1992Sep28.084311.18791@a.cs.okstate.edu> saeed@a.cs.okstate.edu (SAEED FAISEL) writes:
>: >I have a 386/40 compatible & win 3.1.
>: >
>: >1. How can I want always start windows in 386 enhanced mode ?
>: >
>: >2. How can I make windows to make most use of the 4 MB ram ?
>: >   I am currently using the following config.sys
>: >
>: >     DEVICE=C:\DOS\HIMEM.SYS
>: >        DOS=HIGH,UMB
>: >        DEVICE=C:\DOS\EMM386.SYS 1024 RAM
>: >        . . .
 
One difficulty you might be running into here is your somewhat
Windows-hostile memory arrangement.  Unless you have a compelling reason
to run a DOS app that *requires* EMS *outside* of Windows, you've likely
got too much memory given away to EMS.  The setup I have (which works
well on a 4mb 386) is:
 
device=c:\dos\himem.sys
device=c:\dos\emm386.exe noems    <---- allows high loading w/o providing ems
dos=high,umb
devicehigh=.....
 
Windows wants first crack at any and all extended memory it can get ahold of,
and won't use EMS at all.  Your "1024 RAM" on the EMM386 line converts 1mb of
extended memory into 1mb of (useless to Windows) EMS.
 
There are other situations that can keep you out of 386 Enhanced mode under
Windows.  If the above isn't it, check for TSRs that hijack extended memory
for their own nefarious purposes, faulty RAM, etc.  Hope this helps!
Bruce H. McIntosh    brucem@neufhou.mail.ufl.edu            Jesus has risen!
                     bhm@cis.ufl.edu
                     dhbhm@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu
 UF Housing user support on IBM Aggravation System/400 :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OBSOLETE (n.) - dependable, reliable, inexpensive and readily available
Support trailing-edge technology!
From: johne@tule.intel.com (John Elliott)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Going from 4MB to 8MB RAM
Date: 30 Sep 92 20:11:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: aus.1992Sep30.201147.27082
Reply-To: johne@tule.intel.com (John Elliott)
Organization: Software Technology Group, Intel Corp.


In article <1992Sep28.171813.4370@msdhsv.ingr.com>,
ahmad@norooz.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Ahmad Alavi) writes:
> 
> I just added 4 more MB to my computer. I was expecting to see less
> disk activities from Windows 3.1 but I did not. So I wrote the following
> test program.
> 
> 
> I ran this program from Run command of Program Manager in a freshly booted
> machine. If I have 8MB of memory I should not see any disk activity after
> the initial load. Right? I see disk activities twice. One for each loop,
> I assume. Is that the way it supposed to work? Am I assuming something
> wrong? Do I have to run any kind of setup? Have I wasted my $160?
> 
> Please help.
> 
> MSD shows 8MB of memory.

I saw a suggestion about the swap file.  This is correct.
Another user of your "unused" memory is smartdrv.  Since windows installs
this by default, it will be taking up to 2 mb of memory.  As your test 
program asks for more memory, it will write cached data to the disk drive
and release the memory to your program.
(Yes, by default under 3.1, disk writes are cached.)
From: cbt@cam-orl.co.uk (Chris B Turner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: 386max and F1280
Date: 13 Oct 92 10:25:30 GMT
Organization: Olivetti Research Ltd


I think that the 386max romsearch program falls over on my machine because I
have an Orchid Farenheit video card, is that right?

If so why does the F1280 cause so these problems?

Also, does anyone know what the difference is between monoumb.386 and
monoumb2.386 and when and why you should install them?

I'm told that the monoumb drivers don't work with an F1280, is that right?

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Turner cbt@cam-orl.co.uk
Olivetti Research Laboratory        If it doesn't smell it isn't multimedia!
Cambridge. England
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Using mouse in Win3.1 DOS window?
Date: 12 Oct 92 17:18:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: mksol.1992Oct12.171841.21749
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc

In <1992Oct11.124719.8060@sactoh0.sac.ca.us> dwj@sactoh0.sac.ca.us (Daniel W. James) writes:

>My own research has found the answer to this to be no, but I'm hoping
>someone here will change this to a yes.

>I do want to have the mouse available in most of my DOS windows, however I
>often access our Database through Procomm (for DOS), and find the
>availability of the mouse to be unnacceptable.  I'm tired of having control
>characters embedded in my shell scripts just because I bumped the table too
>hard while I was keying in a large command.

I believe that there is a patch for this from Datastorm; it seems a
lot of people want to be able to disable the mouse in Procomm.

>Is there any way to disable the mouse for a dos window while maintaining the
>other dos sessions access to the mouse driver?  Is there a command line
>switch to procomm that disables the mouse?  I have set the mouse
>sensitivity to 999 which cuts down somewhat, but I'd like to be able to
>shut it off altogether.

I don't think you can do it on a per-window basis.  Hey, Microsoft, is
it time to add something about mouse use to the PIF file?

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
From: ad@fermi.wustl.edu (Andrew Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Please upload Diamond SS24X Drivers to cica?
Date: 9 Oct 92 04:29:15 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Washington University Astrophysics
NNTP-Posting-Host: fermi.wustl.edu


Could a kind soul please upload the latest Diamond Speedstar 24X video
drivers to cica? ( Or let me know where else I might ftp them) I believe the
latest version is 2.02. I only have a 2400 baud modem at home :( so would
rather not get them off their BBS.

Thankyou,

Andrew J. Davis
ad@cosray.wustl.edu
From: collins@emperor.gatech.edu (Tom Collins)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: 1 x 3 SIMMS ?
Date: 16 Oct 92 19:14:54 GMT
Organization: CERL-EE, Georgia Institute of Technology
Originator: collins@emperor

In article <1992Oct15.140302.459@spectrum.xerox.com> Sprague.Wbst311@Xerox.com writes:
[Original attribution missing]
>> I'm upgrading my PC to 8 mb from 4.  ...  I need 1 9 1 Mb SIMMS.
>> My store has just informed by that they now sell 1x3 MB SIMMS
>> instead of 1 x 9.  They say they take up the same physical space
>> and are compatible to the 1x9.
>>
>> Is this true ?  Anyone familiar with using a mix of 1x9 and 1x3
>> in a pc.  Or do I have nothing to worry about ?
>
>Don't confuse bits with chips!  Both SIMMS are 1Mb x 9.  Physically, one
>SIMM uses nine 1Mb x 1 bit chips, while the other uses two 1Mb x 4 bit
>and one  1Mb x 1 bit chips, for a total of three chips.  How your PC
>works with them SHOULD make no difference, as the pin out is the same.
>I think I have 4 Meg of one type, and 4 Meg of the other type in my 386.

This is not quite correct.

The 1x3 SIMMS require a faster refresh rate, so they may or may not work
in any given system.  Even if they do work, they may require that
you set up your timing for a faster refresh than you've been using
in the past (many BIOS/chipset combinations allow this sort of
twiddling). 

The result may be either:

1)  You slow down your system by increasing the refresh rate, or

2)  You seem to be OK without changing your refresh rate, but you
    eventually get intermittent memory errors, or

3)  Your system works fine with either, because it has a fixed 
    refresh rate which is high enough for either type of SIMM.

If you can get 1x9 SIMMs for the same price, get them regardless of
your situation.

Hope this helps.


-- 
Tom Collins                               tom.collins@ee.gatech.edu
Georgia Institute of Technology           (404) 894-2509
400 Tenth St. NW, CRB 384
Atlanta, GA  30332-0540 
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: st1n2@rosie.uh.edu (McCoy, Mark)
Subject: orchid Pro-Designer II problem?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords:  orchid sony video
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 05:01:00 GMT

I have an Orchid Pro Designer II w/ 1MB and a SonyCPD-1304 monitor.
My problem:

  whenever I run a DOS application from windows, my screen goes crazy.
  If I run the app in full screen mode, when I return to windows,
  the screen is flickering and the display is compressed in the horizontal
  and stretched in the vertical.  The same thing happens using the 
  800x600x16 driver supplied by both Orchid and MS.  I have witnessed this
  on another machine with the same monitor/video card combination.

Has anyone else had similar problems, or better yet does anyone have a
solution.

Thanks in advance

Mark McCoy (st1n2@jetson.uh.edu)
From: gt6746a@prism.gatech.EDU (Slapman de Funk)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Qemm and swapfile question
Date: 14 Oct 92 23:13:10 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


     OK guys, here's my problem:  I just recently upgraded from
Windows 3.0 to Windows 3.1.  After finishing setting up, I 
rebooted my computer.  When it started booting Windows it said
that there was a memory conflict at address B000.  I tried loading
it up with Win /d:x, but that didn't work.  Then I tried with
Win /d:v, but that didn't work either.  Finally I had to block 
out a chunk of memory so that windows would run.  This finally
worked, but now I have a huge chunk of memory blocked out just
for windows, that Windows doesn't even use all of.  But if I don't
block out the whole thing, windows won't load up.  I am using Qemm
6.02 as my memory manager.  And since I had to block out that
chunk of memory, all the other memory resident program I had take
up more memory than they used to.
     My other problem seems to be that now that I have screwed
with the memory, I have a 7.5 meg hard drive swapfile that takes 
up most of the last unused portion on my hard drive.  What the
hell?  
     I would be greatly appreciative of anyone that could help me.
Thanks in advance.

Lawton Brown
gt6746a@prism.gatech.edu
From: cjohnson@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Christopher Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: Using mouse in Win3.1 DOS window? (3button?)
Date: 9 Oct 1992 03:29:47 GMT
Organization: The University of Westrn Australia
Distribution: world,local
NNTP-Posting-Host: tartarus.uwa.edu.au

>david@datamark.co.nz (David Rowland) writes:

>In article <1992Oct8.203607.22238@nmsu.edu> jhall@nmsu.edu (HALL) writes:
>>: 
>>
>>I use a logitech mouse with the windows mouse drivers. (mouse.sys)
>>It works great, I use borland C and turbo pascal in windowed windows box
>>everyday.  I have never had a bit of problem with the mouse.  It works
>>flawlessly for me.

>The microsoft mouse driver version 8.20 allows the mouse to be used in
>a windowed box.  This is not the driver which is the default for
>windows 3.1 and must be loaded from the dos prompt before loading
>windows.

Has anyone got the drivers to allow you to do this with a 3 button mouse
systems mouse?

Thanx in advance,

Chris.
--
__________________________________________________________ When Something
Christopher Johnson         | this letter was written     |can go wrong it
cjohnson@tartarus.uwa.oz.au | using 100% recycled         |Segmentaion fault
johnson@swanee.ee.uwa.oz.au | electrons                   |Core dumped         | I reserve the right to be totally wrong!
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: aruggeri@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Anthony Robert Ruggeri)
Subject: Paradise VGA Problems
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 23:24:10 GMT

I recently installed one of the new Paradise drivers for 640x480x256 mode
under Win 3.1, but the driver seems to have some serious problems.  I have
a Paradise card with 512k and the driver is mmwd480, the "WD VGA" which
is much faster than older Paradise drivers.  Unfortunately, whenever
I scroll down (never up) in almost any program, including file list boxes
or main screens, I get pieces of the windows in the scrolled box, or
suddenly appearing at different parts of the screen.  In my communications
program, for instance, the title bar (or part of it) may appear on the
terminal screen or at the icons at the bottom.  Is there an updated driver
of some kind available that does not have this problem?


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
Anthony R. Ruggeri         aruggeri@phoenix.princeton.edu
   Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
 "May you live in interesting times." -Chinese curse
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: zwh@newt.phys.unsw.edu.au (Zheng Weihong)
Subject: Re: Going from 4MB to 8MB RAM
Reply-To: zwh@newt.phys.unsw.edu.au (Zheng Weihong)
Organization: School of Physics / UNSW
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 02:35:09 GMT

How about ramdrive, have anyone experimance with it.

For follwing three cases, can anyone tell me which one has
better windows performance:
1) turn off  Swapper
2) put swapfile in ramdrive
3) copy windows system file into ramdrive, and run windows in
ramdrive.

Thanks,
Zheng
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: david@datamark.co.nz (David Rowland)
Subject: Re: Using mouse in Win3.1 DOS window?
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 01:57:10 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Datamark International Ltd.

In article <1992Oct8.203607.22238@nmsu.edu> jhall@nmsu.edu (HALL) writes:
>Stephen Bate (sbate@atl.ge.com) wrote:
>: In article <29SEP199218440782@misvax.mis.arizona.edu> 
>: dmittleman@misvax.mis.arizona.edu (Daniel Mittleman) writes:
>: 
>: > Warning:  this is at the level of rumor...
>: > 
>: > I have been told that the mouse only works when the dos window is full
>: > screen.  This matches my personal observations of having my mouse work
>: > for me when I make the dos window full screen but it does not work when
>: > I have it be a small window.
>: 
>
>I use a logitech mouse with the windows mouse drivers. (mouse.sys)
>It works great, I use borland C and turbo pascal in windowed windows box
>everyday.  I have never had a bit of problem with the mouse.  It works
>flawlessly for me.

The microsoft mouse driver version 8.20 allows the mouse to be used in
a windowed box.  This is not the driver which is the default for
windows 3.1 and must be loaded from the dos prompt before loading
windows.

Hope this helps !!!
-- 
| David Rowland       | The British are using New Zealanders.  They must |
| Datamark Intl Ltd   | really mean business !                           |
| Wellington          |      -  General Rommel During Northern African   |
| NEW ZEALAND         |         Campaign WWII.                           |
From: dave@rsd.dl.nec.com (Dave Rogers)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: 32bit disk access?
Date: 8 Oct 92 17:53:36 GMT
Organization: BINJFBA Society

In article <Bvst7p.KF@brunel.ac.uk>, ee91alk@brunel.ac.uk (Andrew L Kirby) writes:
|> 
|> I am using a Viglen 486SX with an NEC IDE 107Meg Hard drive, and
|> I found that checking my 32bit disk access box cause the system
|> to become very unstable. It eventually walked on my FAT's. Lucky
|> I keep a backup tape handy! Anyway, I found no significant
|> performance improvements in Dos windows, so I don't bother now.
|> 
|> Has anybody else had similar problems?e

Win 3.1 has code to check for compatibility with a WD1003 disk
controller at startup if 32-bit disk access is enabled.  I have noticed
that several controllers pass the tests but are not really WD1003
compatible.  This probably the problem you are having.  

If the controller is *really* WD1003 compatible, say, by actually being
a WD1003 controller, enormous disk performance improvements can be
achieved.  Later model WD controllers are all, not surprisingly,
compatible. 

===============================================================================
Dave Rogers                    				       
M & R Software, Inc.
Internet:   dave@rsd.dl.nec.com
On contract to: NEC America, Radio Software Dept

Don't take life too seriously; you're not going to get out of it alive anyway.
From: Robert_Ryan@brown.edu (Rob Ryan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Re: ATI Wonder and 43 line DOS shells
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 22:56:07 EDT
Organization: Brown University - Providence, Rhode Island  USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: brownvm.brown.edu
News-Software: BNN via BNN_POST v1.0 beta

I've discovered the source of my error message (or at least how to modify
my PIF to prevent it from coming when I use the ATI drivers), but I still
haven't resolved the cursor problem.  Any suggestions would be greatly
appreciated.

-- Rob
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Rob Ryan, internet:   Robert_Ryan@brown.edu or robr@brownvm.brown.edu
           bitnet:     ROBR@BROWNVM
           Compu$erve: 70324,227
 Brown University, Providence, RI
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ad@fermi.wustl.edu (Andrew Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
Subject: Latest Diamond SS24X Drivers now at cica
Date: 16 Oct 1992 13:24:07 GMT
Organization: Washington University Astrophysics
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: fermi.wustl.edu

I have uploaded the latest Diamond Speedstar 24x drivers to 
ftp.cica.indiana.edu. They are in pub/pc/win3/uploads.
24xwin31.exe is the filename.

Have fun, they appear faster but still buggy, esp. for DOS VGA graphics
apps, at least on my system.

Ciao,
Andrew
ad@cosray.wustl.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: mark@nscf.org (Mark James)
Subject: HELP with PC Speaker Driver
Organization: National Science Center Foundation
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 19:34:03 GMT

I recently got a PC-Speaker Driver from ftp.cica.indiana.edu.  I
installed it on a Gateway 2000 486/33 with no problems except for a
wierd sound when it initially starts to play a sound.

This problem occurs when:

1.  The "test" button in the dialog box for the Speaker driver is
clicked on.  2.  When the "TA-DA" .WAV file plays when windows boots
up.

The strange sound is about 2-3 seconds of a gargling noise followed by
the playing of the .WAV file.  It sounds great except for the gargling
noise at the beginning.

Has anyone got it to work on a Gateway without any problems.  The
documentation says that it might not be stable on some systems.  I
would really like to know if anyone has gotten it to work on their
systems without any problems.

Thanks in advance.

Mark A. James

mark@risky.NSCF.org
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.apps,comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.windows.ms,bit.listserv.win3-l