HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: afrolik@ua.d.umn.edu (Ed Olczyk)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Agony Aunt Andys Helpline/Michele's lame flames
Date: 25 Jan 1993 18:23:05 -0600
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ua.d.umn.edu

In article <1993Jan25.125025.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <930725150730@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk>, STUCS204@IBM3090.BHAM.AC.UK (Richard Thomas) writes:
>[bullshit deleted]
>> Richard Thomas.
>you are boring.
>
>	Michele
I'm sorry, I didn't realize that we are supposed to flame ourselves in this
group.  Yes, you are correct, michele, you are one boring motherfucker.  This
alt.lame.flame shit is starting to get to me.  What the hell kind of flame is
this piece of shit?  Are you trying to be nice?  If so, apparently you don't
understand the group.  Get your head out of your ass and start flaming
people, if you're going to post in here.  If you can't do it, then stay the
fuck out of here.

Here's hoping you get a clue,
-- 
Tony Frolik                                        afrolik@ua.d.umn.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Blinded by love; Jism and J S Graley
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:17:23 GMT

In article <1jp9ptINNcf1@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:

> I suggest the least embarissing thing for you to do is SHUT THE FUCK UP
> and PISS OFF.

I suggest that you re-learn the proper spelling of "embarrassing", not that I
am one to judge, and then TOSS OFF.

--The Phantom
From: moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: a misunderstood apology
Date: 25 Jan 93 06:48:46 GMT
Organization: Washington University,  St Louis MO

Ok: let's make it plain for Michele, Jason and all the other people who
misunderstood my apology.

1) I apologized NOT for the macho flame, BUT for the tone of my post.
   I wanted to make some irony about the kind of girls Michele hungs out,
   and I didn't succeed in it [my post resulted in a pretty sad and
   masculine post, and now I reject it].

2) Nobody complained with private mails or similar stuff about my posting: 
   it's just that, while rereading it and reading some subsequent flame, I 
   realized it was inappropriate. And I don't give a shit that here,
   all you hypocrites, never retract a wrong posting. Here, like in the
   real life, if I make a mistake, I try to correct myself. Ah, but it's sad
   to know that many of you don't have a *real*life.

3) I've never said that I *didn't succeed* in flaming Michele. *that*
   asshole doesn't need explanation or flames: his own posts are enought
   to make all the alt.flame community roll on the floor and laugh at
   him. It's CLEAR, NOW??!!

And let me add something more:

4) this macho-women flame stinks. You all are writing a lot of sexist bullshit 
   without having a minimum clue of what are you saying. Furthermore the
   'game' of Michele really sucks: it's true: this is alt.flame and you
   can say a LOT of bullshit; you can also be kidding, but PLEASE don't make
   me see tons of lines full of crappy lames: I really cannot stand them
   (well, actually I'm testing the 'k' command with this thread...).

5) I've never been involved in a flame war about this topic: I just posted
   my own ideas, and when I realized (very early) that a seriuos discussion 
   was out of the scopes of your clueless minds, i gave up. So don't refer to
   ME as somebody who needed to apologize, or somebody who was actually
   involved in this flame war: it's all trash. If I'm involved in a real
   flame war (and not in a clown war like the actual) I don't post *two* 
   articles on the subject and then I hide: DON'T WORRY!!!!

6) Before writing, here in alt.flame a *lot* of people has to learn how
   to read. Michele, you're the first.

Sincerely fuck you all.

Moana.
From: cress@sam.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A day in the life of: JEFF WITTY
Date: 21 Jan 1993 11:23:01 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: sam.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <1993Jan21.155516.16412@ericsson.se>, etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim) writes:
>In article MHJ@cmptrc.lonestar.org, andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>>
>>Jumpin' Jeeeezus!!!  This is alt.flame fer chrissakes, NOT alt.tasteless!
>>
>>Twitty deserves the worst you can dish out, but geeezus you're using 
>>some mighty heavy ordinance.  Mail this shit to him!  You're fraggin  
>>alot of innocent bystanders with this stuff!
>
>Everyone's fair game.  You're not *seriously* offended, are you?
>
Maybe he is, but then...who cares.  Whooaaa!
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Republican Winners (RE: Republican Losers)
Date: 26 Jan 93 18:52:44 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1993Jan24.221508.4684@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
> In article <1993Jan24.203740.18605@ncsu.edu> dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan21.090534.10258@fuug.fi> 
>>an6594@anon.penet.fi (I AM A COWARD) writes:
>>>
>>>  [.. a bunch of bullshit from a coward who can't
>>>      even put his name on a post  ..]
>>
>>Billary Clinton is nothing more than a draft-dodging adulterous
>>druggie who began back-pedaling from his campaign promises even 
>>before he dragged his liberal ass into the White House.  The only
>>reason he got elected is because Americans are too stupid to 
>>recognize that he's a special interest ass-kisser who will  
>>hand out cushy government jobs to the Democratic criminals,
>>thugs, and party bosses who helped Clinton buy his way into power.
> 
[Jason's brainwashed democratic delusions deleted]
>       
> Sounds like a blue light special to me.

Take your generic K-Mart president Bill back, he requires to double "A"
batteries to operate on  "realistic"  mode.

JEFF WITTY
ARMY R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Dear Moana
Date: 27 Jan 93 02:12:09 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

My lovely Moana,

	Before you and Rob decided to flame me the first time, I was indeed
becoming aware of the size of our posts, and how they were getting to 
be quite unyieldy.  I had tried unsuccessfully the day before to reduce the
size of the posts, and I didn't succeed.  You see, there were things I 
didn't realise about Michelina.  First, I didn't realise how longwinded he
was.  By the time he finished the post, I had so much material to ridicule...
well, I guess I got a little greedy, and that added to the length of my post.
Second, I had no idea that my replies was going to cause Michele to be 
inspired to start "Story Time."  In which he told meaningless, execrable
ennui-packed parables of his sad, shitty life.  Ahh, and third, how was I 
to know that one allegedly employable such as our dear Michelina would resort
to such kidergarten tactics to run his flame.  I kept hoping that there was
something new, some new material.  Now we know that the extent of Michelina's
flaming ability is: "Get a life." "Get a clue." "You are boring." "You are a
moron." "You think to be funny."  "You are cold."  "Fuck you." and various
and sundry references to his deviant sexual activities. 
	In short, I gave Michelina too much credit.  I assumed that he was
some carbon based life form, when he is most likely some kind of rock, or
perhaps a lichen of some sort.  Now I know what to expect from him (i.e.
his withering attention span, his degree of brain inactivity, etc.) and
will be able to deal with him more effectively, and I hope, less lengthily.
Thank you for reading my posts, even when they were out of hand length-wise.
I can assure you that the same type of pounding will continue, but in a new
revised, succinct form. (That way, net.puses like witty and jorn will even
be able to get it.)
	Your reply was welcomed.  Let me know if you have anymore questions.
Oh, and I hope that you won't mind too much if I was to suggest that the
next time you choose to comment on my flaming style would you please eat
shit?  The dietary fiber would do you good.

All the best,
Jason
From: phuar@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr T Moxey)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Date: 28 Jan 1993 11:04:23 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: comfrey.csv.warwick.ac.uk


Ok, just like to say that the attitude taken by Graley is not taken by me, and
I'm disgusted in his views, all we aren't like Graley,

tim 
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan)
Subject: Re: Phantom Exposed: His real name is Vinson Scott Goddard!
Summary: Oooops! Phantom is on the potty! 
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 05:54:48 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.145414.25739@fuug.fi> an7898@anon.penet.fi writes:
>X-anon-to: alt.flame
>
>Well it's claer why he was posting under pseudonym with a name like Vinson
>
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!  Vinson!   BWAHAHAHAHAH!!
>
>Please redirect all responses from now on to "Vinnie" instead of phantom.


Well, actually, I busted the phantom a few days ago. When I sent him email
about it he responded that I would be violating net.etiquette so I didn't
out him (tm) (c).

Out Him (tm) (c) 1993 All RIghts Reserved -  = Martin Hannigan =
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Date: 28 Jan 1993 15:24:13 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: parsley.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <1993Jan27.200623.14104@ncsu.edu> dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
|In article <1k4010INN5of@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk> 
|maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
|
|> That _does_ explain a lot. Fuck off you irish git, and take your stupid 
|> bombs with you. You fucking irish are fucking cowards. All you can do is
|> leave bombs in public places. You don't give a fuck who you kill, as long
|> as youre miles away when it happens. You kill innocent people. Men, women, 
|> children. Little babies, too. Often, they have a lingering, painful death,
|> with their weak bodies laccerated by your flying debris.
|
|Just get the hell out of Northern Ireland, and you wouldn't
|have these problems.  The Brits are so stupid to think that
|they have a right to wag their festering flea-bitten cocks
|all over Irish soil.  They caused all the fucking turmoil
|over there to begin with.  And it's not just the IRA that
|plants bombs--the loyalists do the same thing, and no Brit
|ever complains.  They kill innocent people, and you Brits
|don't do a god damn thing about it.  Fucking hypocrites.  

Getting 'the hell' out of Northern Ireland would be prize stupidity, because
the Northern Irish population want us to stay. The IRA let off their bombs if
we stay, the Loyalists do if we leave.

You really don't know fuck, you smelly little arsehole. As far as I'm concerned
the IRA and the loyalists can exterminate each other. But you see they kill
_innocent_ people. We have to protect those people. 

The 'trouble' is due to two groups of feeble-minded cowardly terrorists, the
IRA and the Loyalists.

So stop crapping on about things you don't understand, you idiot.

|Doug Holtsinger

~THE GREAT NAME
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Graley's crap never stops
Date: 24 Jan 93 21:55:36 GMT
Organization: Washington University,  St Louis MO

STUCS204@IBM3090.BHAM.AC.UK writes:
>Mr. Graley, the jocular clown from alt.warwick.anal-retentive writes -
>>Moana, you are _so_ crap, all you seem able to do is repost my brilliant
>>postings out of context.

It's not my fault if you *don't* have *any* context, puppy John.
It also seems that you don't have any idea of what the word brilliant is
used for. Go to your Webster and open it at the right page: you'll find 
a much more different meaning from what your mama told you.

Anyway, at last, I really admire your persistency in posting in this
group: after all the kicks you have got in the last week, you're
still here for our amusement and entertainment: you should be paid for 
this naughty job!!

>>And get a life.
>You don't seem to use yours at all. Perhaps you could sell Mona your life
>in return for,say 50p. I know your life is worth more than that as it has
>never been used but youve covered it in all sort of putrid stains so I
>would say that 50p for shopsoiled goods is pretty reasonable.

I couldn't agree less with you, Richard. *fifty* p???!!!
Did you made a typo (p == c)???


>>     Its like in the comic books...
>Yeah I know. Everyone seems to kill you Graley, but you still come back
>for more.

Yes, JS: you have a future as subject for a comic book. I imagine the
money that I can make with such a funny main character like you. And don't
worry for the rojalties: with your 0.5% you'll be able to buy a lot of stuff,
among which a new life, a complete set of contexts for your crap and a 
new keyboard with 10 (ten!) caps-lock keys to hit furiously with all your
then fingers before going to sleep.

Moana.
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Super-wop
Date: 25 Jan 93 18:13:25 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <16060146@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com>, tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:
> attention!
> 
> There is someone who has created a Dallagata account who is not really
> Michele.  I created this non-person and now he is flaming me.

Non-person is something that you can say to your father.
> 
> Listen buddy... if you are out there thinking you can flame me as
> Michele, you had better get the syntax right.  

Michele does not have a right sintax, idiot. (shit! now I am 
speaking like K E N).

>I have refined the
> art so that I sound like a super-wop and everyone will be able to 
> tell you from the real Michele.

If you were me, something that you are not, you would 
understand that I (Michele, the only one) never called my-
self "wop". Only american morons call a venetian "wop". 
> 
> So bite rocks asshole....
> 
Fuck you, idiot.

	Michele

PS	Which fucking game are you playing? Do you wanna 
	show that you are me to get all my girls?!?
	Get a life.
From: pete@physchem.ox.ac.uk (Pete Biggs)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: MARINE SHAME: FAGGOT COSMIC
Date: 24 Jan 93 13:26:29 GMT
Organization: Physical Chemistry Laboratory, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ
Originator: pete@joule.pcl


Tell me Twitty Shitty, is it a prerequisite that all members of that bum
fucking club you call the army of the United States of America have
their brain removed?  It must be very reassuring for our colonial
cousins on the other side of the Atlantic to know that they are
"defended" by morons such as you.  Why don't you just stick to what you
know how to do best, like sticking your pin dick up your room mate's
arse, instead of trying (and failing) to put more than two words
together into a coherent sentence.

In article <1993Jan22.134303.13979@bsu-ucs>, 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
> [[Lots of incomprehensible drivel deleted]]
> Let me help you with some disipline: 
Let me help you with some English - on second thoughts there's no point,
you probably have the same power to assimilate rational thought as a
brain dead goldfish.  Ah well, I suppose you don't need much in the way
of conversation when you're giving the General a blow job.

> Fuckin prick. 
I couldn't have put it better myself.

> JEFF TWITTY
> ARMY C.R.O.T.C.H.

Pete

-- 
=============================================================================
Pete Biggs :{)                         Janet: pete@uk.ac.ox.physchem
                                    Internet: pete@physchem.ox.ac.uk
=============================================================================
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: why?
Date: 23 Jan 93 14:44:01 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan23.120954.1@acad.drake.edu>, vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
> In article <35742@olympus.wustl.edu>, moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
> 
> To an extent.... you see, we ALL have been kicking Michele painfully in the
> ass.

Bullshit! I kicked your ass more painfully than you from the 
*first* day that I came here. You know it. Such a liar.

How you losers can kick my ass painfully, it is something that I 
can't understand, there are no way. So, you didn't.
> 
> --The Phantom

	Michele
From: Kevin Walsh <kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Andy YeeeeeeHart's mother is a crack-head.
Keywords: Andy the hard-working contributor to society elocutes
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:26:45 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <C16MyD.J3A@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy YeeeeeeeHart) writes:
> (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN) writes in regards to his A4000:
> >Nope, RANDY-ANDY. I honestly made my own money this summer to buy it.
> >You shouldn't whine because you have an inferior machine, you know.
> >Jealousy hurts no one but yourself. In USA the price of the A4000
> >(less than $2700) is almost half of what we must pay over here. There's
> >really nothing to it but buying the damn thing.
> 
> Nothing to it if you've no rent payments to make, groceries to buy, 
> utilities to pay, social life to pay for.  In short, nothing to it if
> you're a college dweeb living off mummy and daddy's largesse.
> 
It sounds like the standard of living in Texas is about as grim as it
is North of Watford.  What's the point of working just to pay for your
one room flat above the stables at Lonestar and have nothing left over
each week to save for useful bits of kit like the Amiga?

I think you are talking out of your arse and you are feebly attempting
to cover up the fact that when you say "social life to pay for" you really
mean that you spend your excess wad on crack to feed your mother's habit.

You should get another job, Andy - that's assuming that you are qualified
to do anything other than mind the horses in the Lonestar stables while
the employees get on with the real work.  You're lucky that no one in
Texas can afford a car or you'd be out of a job and would have to sell
yourself to passing punters to pay for your crack-head mother.  Why don't
you dump her and find some one else to fuck?

Make sure you clean the shit off the floor before you go home tonight!

YeeeeeeeeeeeeeeHart!  Mind them thar horses ol' timer, Y'hear?

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     Professor Kevin Walsh
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: re: A day in the life of: JEFF WITTY
Date: 21 Jan 93 05:36:53 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1993Jan20.164335.17230@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>, Mark B. writes:
> 
[Ji(s)m's sexual fantasy deleted]

Mark B. writes:
> 
> This scatalogical testimony is <perhaps> the sickest thing I have 
> ever read in this newsgroup. It has even more poignancy because 
> every word of it is true. It certainly deserves to be inducted 
> into the annals (anals?) of the Hall of Flame.
> 
> Sir, I salute you.

What the hell? You butt slaming Ji(s)m or something? It's really
sad that you defend Euro-scum like Graley and Jorn by supporting
this material. Open your eyes, they think of you as a little flea.
It's a shame you and others idolize them, then proving your love by
posting "Pro-Graley, Pro-Jorn" shit like this.
> 
> As for you, Jeff. Can't you think up anything better than copying 
> a Haushalter post? Currently, one of your flabby (f)lames receives 
> an average of 4 toasty hot retorts. That's 4:1, Jeff. 
> 
> Get the message yet? 

That your ignorant? yes.
> 
> You are outnumbered. Put those wagons in a circle, soldier! 
> There'll be no Cavalry this time.

I fight to the death. Tell me, did you come prepared? NOT!

> 
> Oops. Time to go firebomb the American Consulate.
> 
> Cheers!

Hee-hee, your so blind. Quit sucking up to Euro-scum. 
> 
> Mark B. ;-)

JEFF WITTY
ARMY R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY
From: 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Andy, limedicks, the Brady Brunch, and cannibalism
Date: 26 Jan 93 18:26:38 GMT
Distribution: alt
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <1jpljlINNmp9@ub.d.umn.edu>, serickso@ub.d.umn.edu (Scott Erickson) writes:
> 
> Previously 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu gushed: 
> [bullshit deleted]
>>> Andy, you cheap slut.  You'll write a limerick for
>>> anyone.  Well how about a theme a song:
>  
>>> Here's the story, of a man named Andy,
>>> Who was busy with three boys of his own,
>>> He kept them, chained in his basement,
>>> So he was not alone.
>  
>>> Then one day this Andy met a policeman,
>>> An officer who acted on a hunch,
>>> He searched, through Andy's basement,
>>> And that's how Andy got his gruesome lunch!
> 
>>> His gruesome lunch! etc.
>  
>>> Melvin M. Gladstone
> 
>>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! SO TRUE! ANDY. JEFFREY DAHMER. CONNECTION?
> 
>>JEFF WITTY
>>ARMY R.O.T.C.
>>a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY
> 
> If this is the kind of humor that the rotsy pretty boys finds entertaining,

Acutally, yes.

> then I can understand why they are not given real jobs in the U.S. military.

The military doesn't consider jerking off all over yourself a real job. So
get back to work cream machine.

> It is such a shame that rotsy fags are actually allowed in the U.S. military.

Your statement is false. They aren't. Thats why you're so angered, you were 
turned down by the admissions board.
 
> They all like to pretend that they are so tough, so mighty, but the truth is,

We are.

> they are craven cowards who hide behind scholarships and their academic
> "studies."  During the entire Gulf war, the rotsy sissies sat in their dorm
> rooms, scared shitless that they will be called to duty, while the real men
> and women were out on the front line, risking their lives for their government.

I wasn't in R.O.T.C. when the Gulf War was in progress. I was enlisted and
was 48 hours away from landing in Saudi sand when Sadam shit his pants and 
cryed "peace".

> To a man (when I say man, I say it with poetic license), the ROTC consists of

When I say Fucking asshole busted faggot, I mean fucking asshole busted faggot.
You fucking asshole busted faggot.

> academic underachievers who are not capable enough to get any other type of
> financial aid to attend college.

Actually, I'm not rich so I also had the option of attending college via 
state funds. But, I knew others where in need more than I so I joined R.O.T.C.
Also, I waved my rights to scholarship awards so that those who didn't want
to serve in the military and had no money, could go to college.

> 
> --
> Scott Erickson                                         serickso@ub.d.umn.edu

Your statements are meaningless, after all, your from the Universtiy of
Confused Thought. HA! HA!

JEFF WITTY
ARMY R.O.T.C.
a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY