HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Original_To:  BITNET%"INFONETS@BITNIC.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.infonets
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 17:27:00 EDT
Reply-To:     Info-Nets@Think.Com
From:         VALLEYD@SIMSC.BITNET
Subject:      SUBSCRIPTION TO INFO-NETS

Please subscribe me to Info-Nets@Think.com.
Please subscribe me to Info-Nets@Think.com.
ValleyD@SIMSC
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.infonets
From: emv@msen.com (Edward Vielmetti)
Subject: Re:      Re: NFS mounts over the Internet
Organization: MSEN, Inc. -- Ann Arbor, MI
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 19:18:25 GMT

There's a file system in development at Carnegie Mellon
called "alex" which tries to provide a more native feel
to remote FTP sites.  Rather than NFS mount each one 
separately, you run an NFS server that caches FTP requests
and directory information.

FTP to alex.sp.cs.cmu.edu for more information.  Alex is
also responsible for the "ftpable-readmes" WAIS server.
Vincent Cate (vac@cs.cmu.edu) is the person responsible.

--
Edward Vielmetti, vice president for research, MSEN Inc. emv@msen.com
      MSEN Inc., 628 Brooks, Ann Arbor MI  48103 +1 313 741 1120
From: aem@paris.cs.miami.edu (a.e.mossberg)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.infonets
Subject: Re: Encapsulation of decnet addresses in internet addresses
Date: 7 Apr 92 14:46:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: paris.ku3de0INNlvl
Reply-To: aem@paris.cs.miami.edu
Distribution: na
Organization: Dept. of Mathematics & Computer Science, University of Miami
NNTP-Posting-Host: paris.cs.miami.edu

In <9204070850.AA13810@Early-Bird.Think.COM> 
"Norval Smith (UVAALF::NSMITH)" <NSMITH@ALF.LET.UVA.NL> writes:

>I retried it as:
>        in%"'gvvax2::gvvax2::mrgate::a1::lacroij'@think.com"
>and this was accepted. Does this indicate a bug or configuration fault in our
>local PMDF mailer?

Why does gvvax2 appear twice??

aem

-- 
a.e.mossberg   -   aem@paris.cs.miami.edu   -   aem@umiami.bitnet
University of Miami Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
From: ree88132@zach.fit.edu (Keith Ledig /ADVISOR Kozaitis)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.infonets
Subject: Re: documentation wanted...
Date: 14 Apr 92 23:03:40 GMT
Organization: Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne USA

You have a very good question, beginner or advanced user we all have questions
from time to time and not all of us are privy to this knowledge.  It is all
out there in fragmented piece-parts.  What needs to be done is to gather as muchas possible and compile an Internet (all-encompassing) user guide and have it
resident on all machines just like the unix command "man" (online manual
for unix commands, to who don't know this).  Not only would this cut down on
FAQ's but major bandwidth as well understanding that some of these documents
are transfered VERY frequently and can be quite large.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.infonets
Organization: Ciemat (Madrid) - Computer Center
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 09:33:01 GMT
Reply-To:     Info-Nets@Think.Com
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was NETNEWS@EMDJEN11
From:         HERAS@EMDJEN11.BITNET
Subject:      Pretoria (South Africa)

        Hi networkers.

Could  somebody say me what is the gateway node to reach Pretoria in South
Africa ??

            The addres is: cfis0023@upvm2.up.ac.za

but I obtain the next message:

 Mitvma.mit.edu enable to deliver following mail to recipient(s):

                       <fis0023@upvm2.up.ac.za>
 mitvma.mit.edu received negative reply:
 554 transaction failed.

    Thanks in advance

                   Jesus Sanz
                 Computing Center of CIEMAT (Madrid)
                 Spain.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <owner-info-nets@Think.COM>
Errors-To: owner-info-nets@Think.COM
X-Administrator: Robert L. Krawitz <info-nets-request@think.com>
Precedence: bulk
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.infonets
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 05:50:10 -0400
Reply-To:     Info-Nets@Think.Com
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was owner-info-nets@THINK.COM
From:         ZINSER%DDAGSI5.BITNET@VM.GMD.DE
Subject:      Re: ADRESS ?
Comments: To: INFO-NETS@Think.COM

You <HANS KROEGER <"ESTCS1::PSI%SPAN.DORNIERF::KROEGER"@STSCI.EDU>> worte:

>Hi Netters,
>
>can anybody provide me with INTERNET address of the following US-Army
>facility:
>
>Ft. Belvoir
>RD&E-Center
>Ft. Belvoir VA
>
>The person whome I would like to contact is Brian Hornbeck.

I don't know about Mr. Hornbeck but you can reach the fort at
BELVOIR.ARMY.MIL (128.190.0.1). The address of the host-admin is
      Nickless, Art  (AN6)  anickless@BELVOIR.ARMY.MIL
      (703) 704-2718

                            Good luck, Martin

* Martin P.J. Zinser                       Email: ddagsi5 (Bitnet)
* KP II                                           vipmzs.physik.uni-mainz.de
* Gesellschaft f. Schwerionenforschung GSI        vzdmze.zdv.uni-mainz.de
* Postfach 11 05 52
* D-6100 Darmstadt 11                      Voice: 0049+6151/359789
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <owner-info-nets@Think.COM>
Organization: Syracuse University Computing Services
Errors-To: owner-info-nets@Think.COM
X-Administrator: Robert L. Krawitz <info-nets-request@think.com>
Precedence: bulk
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.infonets
Date:         Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:47:00 LCL
Reply-To:     Info-Nets@Think.Com
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was owner-info-nets@THINK.COM
From:         Network Manager <NETMAN%SUVM.bitnet@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Subject:      Spanish UUCP Address
Comments: To: Info-Nets@Think.COM

I have a person trying to contact a friend on a UUCP node in Spain.
He has the address:

att!ihlpb!hvlpb!hvgtw!magpd!gvarela

We tried the UUCP gateway at Princeton

att!ihlpb!hvlpb!hvgtw!magpd!gvarela@UUCPGATE

and received a message that the message had been delivered to
postmaster@uucp and since then nothing.

Now the question.  How do I find the information that I need to
verify that address?  I.e. do all the nodes exist? and are there
any omissions?


Glenn A. Malling (NETMAN@SUVM) or netman@suvm.acs.syr.edu
Computing & Network Services   +1 (315) 443-4111
Machinery Hall
Syracuse University
Syracuse, New York 13244-1260
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Princeton University, Network Systems, Class. 56
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 12:05:05 -0400
From:         gettes@PRINCETON.EDU
Subject:      Re: Questions about BITNET versus BITNET II
              08 Apr 92 10:44:07 -0500. <9204081547.AA02223@Princeton.EDU>

Ok, some definitions:

BITNETII: A protocol developed by Peter Olenick at Princeton University
to allow for the transmission of the NJE protocol using TCP services.
This protocol was developed under a grant from NSF whereby Ira Fuchs,
Larry Landweber and David Farber were principle investigators.

VMNET: The first implementation of the BITNETII protocol. Developed
specifically for VM systems to co-exist with RSCS and the IBM TCPIP
product for VM.

BITNETII project: During the development of the BITNETII protocol
on VM (which means the development of VMNET as well) it was necessary
to have a collection of sites utilizing the VMNET program to find problems
and run the program in diverse environments for robustness. The project
finally grew to carrying production traffic over some 12 sites. The BITNETII
project was considered to be successful and proved the the BITNETII protocol
works and that VMNET was a successful and robust implementation of the
BITNETII protocol. It was now time to create the BITNETII core.

BITNETII core: A plan that was designed and implemented to restructure
the BITNET network so it would not drown under its own weight. This
plan was based upon the use of the BITNETII protocol and lessons learned
from the BITNETII project. The BITNETII core has been implemented using
VMNET. The BITNETII core was implemented in June of 1990. The BITNETII
core is a collection 14 sites providing such human and computer resources
to carry the growing load of BITNET. With the network being regionalized
we now have a better understanding and better control of the network
as opposed to the more chaotic version of BITNET I. This is not to say
that the current network is NOT chaotic -- what network isn't?

A BITNETII site: any site/node making use of the BITNETII protocol.
The BITNETII protocol has been implemented on VM, VMS, Unix, JES.
I believe that is all, someone correct me if there are implementations
for other platforms.

EARNII: EARN restructured itself in the beginning of 1991 based upon
the experiences and design of the BITNETII core.

Now, this is of course my interpretation of the events and terminology
to describe them. Others may use it slightly different but I believe
this is the essence of BITNETII in general.

Hope this helps.

/mrg
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 10:44:07 CDT
From:         "McMahon,Brian D" <MCMAHON@GRIN1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Questions about BITNET versus BITNET II

I'm a bit confused about the terminology.  I had always associated the
phrase "BITNET II" with the group of BITNET backbone sites (KSUVM, PSUVM,
OHSTVMA, etc.) that was created to forestall the day when BITNET routing
collapses of its own weight. 8-)

I didn't think BITNET II meant *any* site that happened to use NJE-over-IP
instead of the traditional bisync line to carry its traffic to the next
link.  After all, NJE can ride on all kinds of transports these days
(DECnet, OSI, SNA, carrier pidgeon).  It's even possible for two nodes to
use TCP/IP to carry their NJE traffic, and not even be connected to the
Internet at large:

NodeA ---local TCP/IP--- NodeB ---bisynch--- NodeC --- rest of BITNET

This would make sense if, e.g., NodeA and NodeB were on the same campus
LAN, which happened to be TCP/IP-based, but not necessarily "on the
Internet" in the usual sense of the term.  Would we still speak of the
NodeA-NodeB link as "BITNET II"?

Mind you, this is mostly a matter of semantics, but now I'm curious about
what exactly the term means.  I hate to pass out wrong information if I can
avoid it....

Brian McMahon        <MCMAHON@GRIN1.BITNET>        <MCMAHON@AC.GRIN.EDU>
Postmaster / Acad. Software Support   Grinnell College Computer Services
Grinnell, Iowa 50112 USA   Voice: +1 515 269 4901   Fax: +1 515 269 4936
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 15:16:09 EDT
From:         Larry Snodgrass <SNODGRAS@BITNIC.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Questions about BITNET versus BITNET II

On Tue, 7 Apr 1992 16:49:00 EST <BNET@MCOIARC> said:
>We are trying to get rid of the VAX/780 that we currently use to physically
>connect to BITNET.  As a part of this, we are considering using our
>TCP/IP line for the Internet to serve both the Internet and BITNET.  If
>my understanding is correct, this constitutes a BITNET II site?
>
>I'm not very clear on all this as I was only recently deemed the
>postmaster here.  Could someone please send me information pertaining
>to the differences in services and costs between being a BITNET
>versus BITNET II site if there are any?
>
>If there is a better place to go for this information, please let me
>know and I will pursue it.

In addition to Mike Gettes' comments you might also take a look at the
file BITNET-2 INFO from LISTSERV@BITNIC.  It will point you to other
places for more information for your specific hardware.

Larry Snodgrass

>Thank you very much.
>
>Karen E. Torok                               BNET@MCOIARC
>Hospital Systems Coordinator                 TOROK%CUTTER@MCOIARC
>Medical College of Ohio                      torok@opus.iarc.mco.edu
>(419)381-5446                                POSTMASTER@MCOIARC
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 12:19:03 -0400
From:         Erik L Seielstad <ERIK@BROCK1P.BITNET>
Subject:      re: bsmtp mailer

 > From:         Jeff KELL <Jeff_KELL@ADMIN.UTC.EDU>
 > Subject:      bsmtp support

 > Just add the upper-level domain (brockport.edu) and let it do
 > mail forwarding for lower-level machines under that domain.  There
 > is no need to list the final machines explicitly (which actually
 > defeats the purpose of having the domain entry).

    thanks jeff - but I want to test the code before I put
Brockport.edu in...since out software currently is running (almost)
straight RSCS protocol.  (that is, all mail received here at Brock1p
is placed in a queue, addressed to 'userid@brock1p'.  The mail
software then scans the queue looking for their userid.

    If I were to add the domain 'brockport.edu' to the domain names
file, I suspect 80% of the mail we receive would be addressed to my
untested bsmtp mailer, right?

         -Erik Seielstad
          Erik@brock1p
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
P1-Message-Id: CA* *QueensU.CA;QueensU:NwVz77@4
X400-Trace:   CA* *QueensU.CA; arrival Wed, 15 Apr 92 15:48-0400 action Relayed
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 16:13:26 -0400
From:         Andrew.S.Hooper@QUEENSU.CA
Subject:      Publication
Comments: To: Herb Kugel <UPDATE@Nac.NetNorth.CA>,
              Onet discussion <onet-discussion@onet.on.CA>,
              netnorth netrep <netrep-l@Nac.NetNorth.CA>

One place is ftp.ccs.queensu.ca (130.15.48.1) in pub/netinfo/tcp-ip-intro.doc.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Princeton University, Network Systems, Class. 56
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 11:03:54 -0400
From:         gettes@PRINCETON.EDU
Subject:      Re: Questions about BITNET versus BITNET II
              07 Apr 92 16:49:00 -0500. <9204072100.AA04178@Princeton.EDU>

On Tue, 07 Apr 92 16:49:00 -0500 bnet@mcoiarc.bitnet said:
> We are trying to get rid of the VAX/780 that we currently use to physically
> connect to BITNET.  As a part of this, we are considering using our
> TCP/IP line for the Internet to serve both the Internet and BITNET.  If
> my understanding is correct, this constitutes a BITNET II site?

Correct.

>
> I'm not very clear on all this as I was only recently deemed the
> postmaster here.  Could someone please send me information pertaining
> to the differences in services and costs between being a BITNET
> versus BITNET II site if there are any?

As for the traditional BITNET services (file transfer, messages and
commands and everything else you have come to know and love/hate) there
is no change in these services. Making use of BITNETII simply allows you
to replace the physical transport medium and not the services. The major
difference in costs will be found when you no longer have to pay for
the leased line that connected you to the next BITNET node. Since you
are already connected to the Internet, and I will assume that your VAX
is already TCP/IP capable, there are no additional costs in hardware.
As for software, you may need to contact your vendor for a BITNETII capable
driver. There are no changes to your CREN membership costs.

> If there is a better place to go for this information, please let me
> know and I will pursue it.

If you want to inquire further about technical issues and find out
about the experiences of others you may want to subscribe to the
BITNET-2 list at TCSVM. This list discusses BITNETII on all platforms.

Hope this helps.

/mrg
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 10:37:03 -0400
From:         Erik L Seielstad <ERIK@BROCK1P.BITNET>
Subject:      bsmtp support

    I've been planning to upgrade our homebrew bitnet software, to
include a bsmtp mailer (yeah).

    The only problem is I would like to test my code before I add
BROCK1P to the DOMAIN NAMES file.

    So, is it possible for me to add a non-bitnet machine (say
'kazumi.acs.brockport.edu') to the DOMAIN NAMES file with a BSMTP
mailer entry.

    then bsmtp mail for that machine could be sent to say
KAZUMI@BROCK1P ?

         -Erik Seielstad
          Systems Programmer/Analyst.
          SUNY College at Brockport
         bitnet: Erik@brock1p
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Original_To:  BITNET%"NODMGT-L@BITNIC"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 09:52:00 EDT
From:         John Hahnfeld <HAHNFELD@HUGSE1.BITNET>

SUBSCRIBE NODMGR-L John Hahnfeld
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 14:21:52 CDT
From:         Barry Finkel <B19141@ANLVM.CTD.ANL.GOV>
Subject:      Service-only CBPDO Subscription Offering and MVS PUTs

I RECEIVE each PUT when it arrives; in fact I am about to RECEIVE 9202
into my MVS, NCP, and CICS global zones.  I don't do periodic maintenance
(except on selected FMIDs), but I like having all of the PTFs available
if and when I need them.  I can get newer PTFs I need via IBMLink and
overnight courier, but in many cases I have the needed PTF and pre-reqs
already RECEIVED.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
========> NOTE THE CHANGE IN PHONE NUMBER - EXCHANGE IS NOW 252. <=======
Barry S. Finkel
Computing and Telecommunications Division
Argonne National Laboratory               BITNET:   B19141@ANLVM
9700 South Cass Avenue                    Internet: B19141@ANLVM.CTD.ANL.GOV
Building 221, Room B223                   Phone:    (708) 252-7277 <===========
Argonne, IL   60439-4844                  Facsimile:(708) 252-5983 <===========
                                          FTS:            972-7277
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Organization: Indiana University of Pennsylvania
X-Envelope-to: NODMGT-L@BITNIC.BITNET
X-VMS-To: NetMail%"NODMGT-L@BITNIC.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 13:01:00 EST
From:         Mark_Strawcutter <MJSTRAW@IUP.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: bsmtp mailer

>    If I were to add the domain 'brockport.edu' to the domain names
>file, I suspect 80% of the mail we receive would be addressed to my
>untested bsmtp mailer, right?

Only mail originating at bitnet-only sites addressed using the DNS names for
your hosts.  Mail addressed using your bitnet address will still come directly
to the user (the :servers tag in BITEARN NODES is what controls this, not
DOMAIN NAMES)

----------
Mark J Strawcutter                           BitNet:    MJSTRAW@IUP
Director, Systems and Communications         DNS (mx):  mjstraw@grove.iup.edu
Indiana University of Pennsylvania           Voice:     (412) 357-4000
Indiana, PA   15705                          "you can't nail jello to a tree"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:25:15 -0400
From:         Herb Kugel <UPDATE@NAC.NETNORTH.CA>
Subject:      Publication
Comments: To: Onet discussion <onet-discussion@onet.on.ca>,
              netnorth netrep <netrep-l@Nac.NetNorth.CA>

Hi, I am looking for the publication 'Introduction to an Internet-
Based Local Area Network' by Charles L. Hederick, (1988).

Does anybody have an e.mail copy of this or can anyone tell me where
it might be in FTPland?  I have been told by somebody that it is
very helpful and well written....if anybody knows where it is, it
would save me a great deal of time in searching.

Thanks.


Herb Kugel
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NODMGT-L@UGA.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN"NODMGT-L@UGA"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 16:49:00 EST
From:         BNET@MCOIARC.BITNET
Subject:      Questions about BITNET versus BITNET II

We are trying to get rid of the VAX/780 that we currently use to physically
connect to BITNET.  As a part of this, we are considering using our
TCP/IP line for the Internet to serve both the Internet and BITNET.  If
my understanding is correct, this constitutes a BITNET II site?

I'm not very clear on all this as I was only recently deemed the
postmaster here.  Could someone please send me information pertaining
to the differences in services and costs between being a BITNET
versus BITNET II site if there are any?

If there is a better place to go for this information, please let me
know and I will pursue it.

Thank you very much.

Karen E. Torok                               BNET@MCOIARC
Hospital Systems Coordinator                 TOROK%CUTTER@MCOIARC
Medical College of Ohio                      torok@opus.iarc.mco.edu
(419)381-5446                                POSTMASTER@MCOIARC
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Cornell Information Technologies
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:53:33 EDT
From:         John Voigt <FLIX@CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Publication
              15 Apr 1992 15:25:15 -0400 from <UPDATE@NAC.NETNORTH.CA>

On Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:25:15 -0400 Herb Kugel said:
>Hi, I am looking for the publication 'Introduction to an Internet-
>Based Local Area Network' by Charles L. Hederick, (1988).
>
>Does anybody have an e.mail copy of this or can anyone tell me where
>it might be in FTPland?  I have been told by somebody that it is
>very helpful and well written....if anybody knows where it is, it
>would save me a great deal of time in searching.
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>Herb Kugel

Back when I used to run the LISTSERV at Tulane (TCSVM) I had that file
available.  I don't remember the name but I'm pretty sure it was a
LISTING file.  You might want to take a look there.  There were also
some other very good documents about the internet there.

Hope this helps,

John/
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nodmgt-l
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 11:20:59 CDT
From:         "McMahon,Brian D" <MCMAHON@GRIN1.BITNET>
Subject:      BITNET II

Aha.  So Joiner's TCP/NJE module for Jnet is an implementation of the
BITNET II protocol.  (Joiner's DECnet and OSI modules are either
BITNETxyz or entirely the local site's business, at least until the
Internet migrates to OSI (pause for laughter).)

Thanks to mrg for such a prompt and lucid explanation.

Brian McMahon        <MCMAHON@GRIN1.BITNET>        <MCMAHON@AC.GRIN.EDU>
Postmaster / Acad. Software Support   Grinnell College Computer Services
Grinnell, Iowa 50112 USA   Voice: +1 515 269 4901   Fax: +1 515 269 4936
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Mon, 6 Apr 1992 10:50:14 EDT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
From:         "Lois C. Severt" <LCSEVE01@ULKYVM.LOUISVILLE.EDU>
Subject:      OVGTSL 1992
X-To:         NOTIS-L@TCSVCM.BITNET, SERIALST@UVMVM.BITNET,
              AUTOCAT@UVMVM.BITNET, INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET

Head, On-line Records Cataloging
PHONE: 588-6756

OHIO VALLEY GROUP OF TECHNICAL SERVICES LIBRARIANS -- 1992 CONFERENCE

The 1992 OVGTSL Conference will be held in Louisville, Kentucky, May 7-8,
with the theme of "Managing Our Collections: Views from the Basement."
The program will focus on various aspects of controlling our collections
within the context of technical services.

Topics include selection decisions and how they impact technical services;
the importance of preserving and weeding our collections; EPIC and the
technical services librarian; and library school education for technical
services.

The Conference will be held at the Radisson Hotel at I-64 and Hurstbourne
Lane.  For registration information contact Lois Severt, OVGTSL Treasurer,
Ekstrom Library, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY  40292.
Phone:  (502) 588-6756
BITNET:  LCSEVE01@ULKYVM

Pre-registration is required.  Registration deadline is April 17.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"INNOPAC%MAINE.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.innopac
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 08:46:00 PDT
              <INNOPAC@MAINE.BITNET>
From:         DDAVIS@FULLERTON.EDU
Subject:      Re: reserves
X-To:         INNOPAC%MAINE.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

Here at CSU Fullerton we use an inventory # preceded by RBR in Call no field &
 an "x" is placed in BCODE3 to suppress from public view unless in reserve
 module. Diana Davis-Circulation/CSU Fullerton Library
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU