From: kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran)
Subject: Re: do Overpeck's flamers have problems themselves? (was: Overpeck's problems)
Summary: This article was never posted in talk.abortion... 
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Keywords: You expect me to mark my deletions?  Dream on...
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 92 22:35:17 GMT

In article <1992Oct4.205149.3755@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>In article <1992Oct4.142928.27369@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran) writes:
>>In article <1992Oct3.061432.4873@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>>>
>>>As near as I can tell, this is the alleged "lie" that TSAKC is getting
>>>so frothed-up about:
>>>
>>>Subject: Re: Strange Bedfellows
>>>Message-ID: <1992May28.184105.26227@odin.corp.sgi.com>
>>>Date: 28 May 92 18:41:05 GMT
>>>
>>>>This is really unlike you-- you're usually more thoughtful than
>>>>this.  I know that Keegan used the mailing list to try to get
>>>>people to post in support of him.  Are you letting friendship
>>>>take precedence over thoughtfulness?  I'm sorry, Keegan!   I
>>>>like you, but I won't agree with you if I think you're wrong.
>>
>>Where is the lie in this statement?  
>
>Good question. Where *IS* the (alleged) "lie" in this statement? Perhaps you 
>should ask the accuser that question.
>
>>And *WHO* are you quoting here?
>
>Duh. Sometimes you're completely bereft of a clue, aren't you, Cochran?

I usually have at least one clue to spare.  Do you need one?

>
>Let's see, I don't suppose if you were following the thread, you might
>have a noticed Keegan accusing CJ of lying about Suzanne Lucia, huh?

Huh?  Most of the time, these sort of threads get a "two pages of quoted
text, so where's the 'N' key?" response from me.  I see the start of one,
occasionally go all the way through some posts, and see bits of the ending
of them.

>
>Or, failing that, I don't suppose you could have figured it out from the
>Message-ID?? Nah...

Gee, now who posts from a computer named "odin"?  Doug Holtsinger?

I give up, Kibbles.  You've made me look like a net.newbie because I don't
have the machine names everybody posts from memorized.

>
>>>Has lack of veracity _ever_ impeded their agenda?
>>
>>Ah, this must be the lie you're talking about.  While I'm not below flaming,
>
>Don't flatter yourself, Keith -- you're not even *UP* to flaming yet.

This from the man whose latest attempt at flaming is to call me a homophobe
while the net laughs at him...

>
>>and I've even quoted Suxanne out of context once or twice, I've never posted
>>somthing that I know to be a lie to the net.  
>
>Either you're extremely ignorant, then, or you're just trying to cover up a 
>whole bunch of lies with this one, because you've posted lots of untrue stuff 
>to the Net; the lie about me threatening to sue Lefty, for instance. I've 

I've certainly asked lots of questions about you and your fantasy of "billing"
lefty for archival services, but I don't think I've ever posted that you were
going to do so.  I'm not your business manager.

>never done such a thing. Or all that crapola about me supposedly claiming 

We know you've never billed Lefty for your archival services.  The big
hoopla is over when you are GOING to do so.

>that "Kevin Darcy" was a "GROUP" [sic]. I've never done that, either.

You never posted that "Kevin Darcy Is A Group".  What you did do was
post some ambigious statements that to me  reasonably stated that you
felt "Kevin Darcy Was A Group".  I stated so.

>
>For someone who professes innocence so intensely, you sure as hell don't
>seem to bother checking your facts before you spew all kinds of 
>disinformation, Cochran. It's possible, I guess, that you really BELIEVE
>all this shit you repeat, but don't you feel any duty to at least make a
>_cursory_ check of an assertion's veracity before you state it? Or do you 
>just unthinkingly accept everything that Keegan and Garvin spoon-feed you as 
>the Holy Gospel Truth?

You just can't keep your fantasies about James and Susan off the net, can
you?

>
>I think a rude awakening awaits you, Keith.

You mean the .net is just a dream I'm having?  Wow.

>
>>And neither have the other members of TSAKC, as far as I know.
>
>And my comments go double (triple, quadruple, googolplexth?) for that 
>sentence, too.

You have doccumentation for these "lies"?  Please post them.
--
=kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu | B(0-4) c- d- e++ f- g++ k(+) m r(-) s++(+) t | TSAKC=
=My thoughts, my posts, my ideas, my responsibility, my beer, my pizza.  OK???=
=National Coming Out Day is Oct 11th, 1992. Closets Are A Place To Put Clothes=
Newsgroups: alt.flame