HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Charles Laine <Charles_Laine@CCIS.BAYLOR.EDU>
Subject: CONFIRMED!!!   SEASON PREMIERE
Organization: Baylor University
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1a2
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 13:34:47 GMT
X-Posted-From: lainec.baylor.edu
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

How will the 1701-D crew return from the 19th century to their own time?

How about this...

The crew lives ordinary lives until the time of "City on the Edge of
Forever".  A few of them die of old age by this time.  They send Data
through the big rock-donut and he exits with Kirk and crew.  Then, data
waits around until the Boseman is commisioned.   He hitches a ride on the
Boseman, and waits till it exits the causality loop returning him to his
normal time.  Data then borrows a bird of Prey from his Klingon friends
made in "Redemption" and hunts down Spock to help him fetch the 1701-D
crew.  Spock and Data perform time travel around the sun and succesfully
arrive at San Fransisco at the time of "Time's Arrow".  They remembered
to bring extra dylithium crystals this time.  They pick up the rest of
the crew, somehow destroy the menace presented in the first half of
"Time's Arrow", and attempt to return to their proper time.  But, oops,
during the return time trip, someone askes Spock 'How do you feel"?  This
distracts Spock long enough to screw up the time travel computations. 
The Bird of Prey ends its time travel journey 22 years earlier than it
should.  Guinan, who's perception "goes beyond linear time" instructs
Picard that the Enterprise C will be making a stop in the Future.  So,
everyone hops abord the Enterprise C, heads for Nirendra 3 and waits for
the rift to open.  The temporal rift opens, the Enterprise C exits 22
years later, and the 1701-D crew is returned to their normal time.

THE END
From: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: PAD
Date: 4 Sep 92 14:49:16 GMT
Reply-To: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Dept., Madison, WI

In <65270@cup.portal.com> Peter_A_David@cup.portal.com writes:
>I dunno.  I heard Peter David hates everybody.

I heard he has a crummy sense of humor, too.

-- 
Michael Rawdon				 rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department, Madison, WI

"Beauty... survives."
				- James T. Kirk, "That Which Survives"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman)
Subject: Re: Dolphins!
Organization: The Admiral's Unix System & The Grid BBS
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 09:52:33 GMT

In article <64363@cup.portal.com> DonD@cup.portal.com (Don Robert DeCosta) writes:
>Ahh... Why did you bring this up?  Now I'm forced to comment and somebody's
>gonna tell me to get a life.... Oh well, here goes...
>
>If in the 24th century we have established enough communcication with marine 
>mammals to use them for 3D navigation consultants then we have to assume they
>are sentient beings... right????  Don't YOU view taking a sentient being and
>sticking them in an aquarium on a space ship a little bit like slavery??? I 
>mean I doubt the Dolphins signed up with Starfleet for the great pay, what woul
>d
>a dolphin do with a paycheck?

Probably cash it. Then blow it all on fresh fish. That's the problem with
dolphins. No money sense at all. They never plan for the future!


-- 
"Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ray, when somebody asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" -- Winston Zeddmore
From: jimmy@pyra.co.uk (Jimmy Aitken)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: The Man Trap
Date: 27 Aug 92 13:20:10 GMT
Reply-To: jimmy@pyramid.com (Jimmy Aitken)
Organization: Pyramid Technology Ltd.

In <1992Aug27.112707.29226@gserv1.dl.ac.uk> atb@gserv1.dl.ac.uk (A.M.T. Bell) writes:

>hi

>One other strange thing. In TNG we always have a few minutes of action
>before the credits, at some dramatic point the action stops and
>Jean-Luc says "Space, the final frontier......". Well in last nights
>episode we had a pre-credit sequence before Jim says "Space, the final frontier...".
>I always thought that TOS didn't have these pre-credit sequences. Am I wrong
>or did the Beeb rearrange it to make it like a TNG episode??


This hit me immediately last night when watching it.  The BSKyB repeat
last year were in the "BBC" form of Credits-Teaser-Episode as they had
simply just used the tapes the BBC had.  It looks like the BBC may have
a) re-edited them back
b) got new masters.

I hope that it's the latter, as we may see some of the more "edited"
versions of some episodes.  Well, I can dream can't I?

(Spelling mistakes due to a keyboard with keys that don't register..)

Jimmy
-- 
jimmy@pyramid.com               -m-------  Jimmy Aitken                
jimmy@pyra.co.uk              ---mmm-----  Pyramid Technology Ltd
...!mcsun!uknet!pyrltd!jimmy-----mmmmm---  Pyramid House, Solartron Rd
(+44) 252 373035          -------mmmmmmm-  Farnborough, Hants GU14 7PL, ENGLAND
`Rrrrum Ti-Tum Ti-Tum Ti-Tum, Rrrrum Ti-Tum Ti Ta-Ta,
 Rrrrum Ti-Tum Ti-Tum Ti-Tum, Rrrrum Ti Tiddly Ta...'
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: wmorgan@stsci.edu (Windsor A. Morgan)
Subject: BALTMORE WBFF TNG Change! (was WDCA changing TNG air time)
Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 13:45:11 GMT


NOTE: There is no "Baltimore" or "Maryland" distribution limit.  If
you have no interest in the schedule for Baltimore's new TNG
broadcast, hit 'n' (or appropriate) NOW!



>In article <1992Aug26.142655.25436@gmuvax2.gmu.edu> kaufman@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Ken Kaufman) writes:

>>WDCA, channel 20 in Washington DC will be changing its Saturday night
>>airtime for new episodes of TNG.  According to today's Washington Post,
>>ST:TNG will be shown Saturdays at 7:00 PM, rather than 6:00, starting
>>September 26th.  There was no mention of any changes in when the episodes
>>are reshown -- 8 days later at 6:00 PM.

>>I guess this means that DC'ers who can't pick up channel 45 in Baltimore
>>will have to wait one more hour to see what happens to Data & co.


In article <1992Aug26.153133.2919@eng.umd.edu> wombat@eng.umd.edu (Jose Gonzalez) writes:

>And even those of us who live in Baltimore may have to wait, considering 
>that Fox is going to primetime programming seven times a week beginning
>in late October.  This takes the 8 p.m. Tuesday spot TNG currrently
>enjoys.  Anyone know what 45 is planning to do?  

I just called.  WBFF (Channel 45) is moving TNG to -- get this --
Saturday at 7:00 p.m.!  *Exactly* the same time as WDCA (Channel 20)!
:-(

The second show will be at the usual time, the next day, Sunday, at
6:00 p.m.

-- 
'Verily, there be no leader as wise as the Vision!'
                         Windsor Morgan (wmorgan@stsci.edu OR NHT@PSUVM.BITNET)
                         Space Telescope Science Institute
                         Baltimore, MD   21218
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
Subject: I gots a kweshun?
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
   I don't really have a question, but I have the plot for episode 2.
     Tasha is still security chief.  Alexander was never born.  Geordi
     HERE IS THE BIG SHOCK!!!!
      Worf had to take over for her while she was in a coma.  The show's
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 02:02:14 GMT

This article was probably generated by a buggy news reader.
From: Tom@freddyk.uucp (Thomas Langenback)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: 11799
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 92 20:30:17 CDT
Distribution: world
Summary: WELL....?
Organization: Nightmares R Us

renken8365@iscsvax.uni.edu says:
>Sorry, this is just a test.
 
Well, don't keep me guessing....how'd I do?????
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
        ______               _
          /                _//                           /           /
       --/ __________      /    __.  ____  _,  _  ____  /_____.  _. /_ 
      (_/ (_) / / / <_    /___ (_/|_/ / <_(_)_</_/ / <_/_) (_/|_(__/ <_
                                           /|
                                          |/
Tom@freddyk.uucp                               ...engr.uark.edu!freddyk!Tom

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: kuchar@buast7.bu.edu (Tom Kuchar)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Who said he's STAYING in the future?  (was re: YIKES!  The cross-over)
Date: 28 Aug 92 12:08:29 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <Btnwuo.Kr2@acsu.buffalo.edu> v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey) writes:
>
>     This is what I heard from that proverbial friend on the set: Doohan
>     is flung forward in time from from sometime before the movie series
>     began, but presumably AFTER TOS ended.  
>     And,    
>     Doohan was actually made up to look YOUNGER during filming because
>     of this.
>
>     This would presuppose that Scotty returns to the past at the end...
>     Where in print or on tv have there been reports saying that Scotty
>     is kept in the TNG era...  because if there have been, I've got a
>     friend in los angeles to kill...

Well, I wouldn't recommend such an extreme response, but do talk to
your friend. Doohan has aged pretty much in the 12 years since STI was
filmed.  He barely resembles the (relatively) svelt Scotty in STI.
Anyway, in the CNN clips, he's not wearing a TOS uniform or a TMP
uniform, but the uniform seen in all other movies.


-- 
Tom Kuchar			  
kuchar@buast7.bu.edu		  -or-                      kuchar@plh.af.mil
Department of Astronomy		                     Phillips Laboratory/GPOB
Boston Univerity		                                  Hanscom AFB
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: vvrcd@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (ROBERT DIBACCO)
Subject: Re: Geordi Dies/Scotty Lives/Triva Contest
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 27 Aug 1992 11:07 EST  

In article <1992Aug26.114334.1@ssdvax.mdcbbs.com>, cuy@ssdvax.mdcbbs.com writes...
>In article <1040@jagubox.gsfc.nasa.gov>, jim@jagubox.gsfc.nasa.gov (Jim Jagielski) writes:
>> lesnyd@monsanto.com (Larry E. Snyder) writes:
>> 
>>>In article <1992Aug25.150132.20391@tin.monsanto.com>, lesnyd@monsanto.com (Larry E. Snyder) writes:
>>>> 
>>>> > >Guy Williams, June Lockhart, Bill Mummy and Angla Cartwright.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >Name that series. :-)
>>>> > 
>>>> > Lost in Space>
>>>> > >For a top prize (a Plutotonium plated Ultra Man)
>>>> > >can you name the other two actors of that series?
>>>> > 
>>>> Johnathon Harris and
>>>> 
>>>> TA-DA
>>>> 
>>>> Billy Mumy, aka Will Robinson
>> 
>>>OOOOOOOPS, you said that, didn't you? You must be talking about Penny, or
>>>the guy that played Penny's boyfriend, oh heck, I don't know!! Sorry!
>> 
>> Let's see, I think it was Mark Goddard as Major West and Kirsten something
>> as the other daughter... Marla Kirsten maybe...
> 
>Ok, here's my $.02 and whatever's been figured out til now:
> 
>Dad (What was his name?) Robinson - Guy Williams
>Mom (What was her name?) Robinson - June Lockhart
>    (whose daughter Anne was on Battlestar Galactica, BTW)
>Don (?) West - Mark Goddard
>Judy Robinson - Marla Kirsten or something
Judy's real name is Marta Kristen
>Penny Robinson - Angela Cartwright
>Will Robinson - Bill Mumy
>Dr. Zachary Smith - Jonathan Harris
> 
>Anyone remember the name of that monkey-thing that they picked up
>somewhere along the line?
The monkey's name was Debbie or the Bloop!
Ths show is mildly entertaining for how inconsistent and dumbe the plots 
were.
> 
>DMC
>==============================================================================
>| Dennis Cuy                                 |If you       you'd be          |
>| E-Mail:  cuy%ssdvax.decnet@mdcgwy.mdc.com  |    lived here,    home by now.|
>|============================================|===============================|
>|The opinions stated are totally mine and    |"I'll have a steak sandwich and|
>|may be subject to restrictions in your area.|a steak sandwich...."          |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: amcmicha@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Andrew McMichael)
Subject: Episode Name
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 17:53:44 GMT

Help!  Could someone please E-Mail me the name of the episode
in which Lwaxana Troi first appeared?  This is for a trivia
contest and your help would be much appreciated by all involved.

Thanks in advance.






Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: smp@gtech.com (Sergio M. Pedro)
Subject: Re: Who was hot on ST: TNG
Organization: GTECH Corporation, West Greenwich, RI
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 19:27:04 GMT

From news.gtech.com!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.unomaha.edu!cwis.unomaha.edu!tomcat Fri Aug 28 10:31:19 EDT 1992
Article: 7382 of rec.arts.startrek.current
From: tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu (Jeffrey S. Jo)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Who was hot on ST: TNG
Date: 27 Aug 92 22:53:55 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha


	Forget all of the women named up to this point.  Does anyone
recall the first season episode "Angel One"?  Well, Mistress Biada (?) is
one pretty lady.  Lucky for Riker, huh?  I don't know who played her, but
she looks kind of familiar?  Does anyone know who she is and where she
might be from?

Does the song "California Dreaming" ring any bells for you???  Yes indeed
this bodacious babe is none other than the 40+ year old Michelle Phillips.
IMHO her daughter still has a long way to go to catch up with the original!

Sincerely,
SMP

-- 
|Jeffrey S. Jo                  |	       U.S.S. Enterprise              |
|Computer Operations		| Galaxy Class - Starfleet Registry NCC-1701-D|
|University of Nebraska at Omaha|        Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards, Mars    |
|tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu        |             Launched Stardate 40759.5       |


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: YANJUNA@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu
Subject: Re: Who was hot on ST: TNG
Organization: Yale University
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 14:50:02 EDT

>
>
>	Forget all of the women named up to this point.  Does anyone
>recall the first season episode "Angel One"?  Well, Mistress Biada (?) is
>one pretty lady.  Lucky for Riker, huh?  I don't know who played her, but
>she looks kind of familiar?  Does anyone know who she is and where she
>might be from?
>
>Does the song "California Dreaming" ring any bells for you???  Yes indeed
>this bodacious babe is none other than the 40+ year old Michelle Phillips.
>IMHO her daughter still has a long way to go to catch up with the original!
>
>Sincerely,
>SMP
>
>--
>|Jeffrey S. Jo                  |	       U.S.S. Enterprise              |
>|Computer Operations		| Galaxy Class - Starfleet Registry NCC-1701-D|
>|University of Nebraska at Omaha|        Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards, Mars    |
>|tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu        |             Launched Stardate 40759.5       |
>
>
 
   You got the wrong babe.  Michelle Phillips was Picard's old flame
in "We'll Always Have Paris"; NOT "Angel One".
    The only way to find the name of the babe on "Angel One" would be
to go back to a rerun or a videotape, but
I don't watch the first season shows that often, and I don't know anyone
who does.
                            Junsok Yang (YANJUNA@Yale)
From: kuchar@buast7.bu.edu (Tom Kuchar)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: A totally unfounded rumor I heard
Date: 31 Aug 92 12:14:19 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <92242.215457DCC117@psuvm.psu.edu> DCC117@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>(*SPOILER*)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



>........I heard that they're gonna make another movie with the old cast, for
>the purpose of killing off Kirk!!??!!! 

Same was said of STVI - again unlikely.

>I also heard that DS9 was slated to be cancelled because a test
>audience hated it.

Many sources (some quoted here) have said that DS9 was to commence
filming of the 2 hour pilot film on Aug 24. It takes a lot longer
than afew days to complete an episode, complete with SFX.

All this sounds like is some one who wants to spread to see what
happens.




-- 
Tom Kuchar			  
kuchar@buast7.bu.edu		  -or-                      kuchar@plh.af.mil
Department of Astronomy		                     Phillips Laboratory/GPOB
Boston Univerity		                                  Hanscom AFB
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu (Jeffrey S. Jo)
Subject: Re: Problem with Scotty being on TNG
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 04:48:33 GMT

00jdbecktel@bsu-ucs.uucp writes:
> 
> I also have an Irk with this theory about Scotty being on TNG.
> Isn't he just too fat to be on network television.
	People change with age.  So he's big.  He's also rich and is 
considered to be part of a unique legend.
> Well I guess they've had everyone else.
> McCoy, Spock, Spock's father.
> Wonder when Kirk can fit in.
	If he does, well, let's hope he doesn't do it just because everyone
else did.  And why not all of these returns from TOS?  They are the ones
who started it all, don't they deserve something? :+)

-- 
|Jeffrey S. Jo                  |	       U.S.S. Enterprise              |
|Computer Operations		| Galaxy Class - Starfleet Registry NCC-1701-D|
|University of Nebraska at Omaha|        Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards, Mars    |
|tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu        |             Launched Stardate 40759.5       |
From: gez@pyra.co.uk
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: My 3yr old wants a picture of TJ Hooker
Summary: Picture of T.J.Hooker Required
Keywords: Hooker Shatner Picture
Date: 4 Sep 92 15:28:44 GMT
Organization: Pyramid Technology Ltd.

Appologies in advance but....

My 3yr old (Michael) loves Star Trek, Captain Kirk and T.J.Hooker

The other day, I pointed to T.J.Hooker and said (expecting the answer
Captain Kirk") who does that look like?

He answered "William Shatner"!!!

Not bad for a 3yr old, eh?

Unfortunately, he now wants a picture not or Kirk (easy) or Shatner
(possible) but T.J.Hooker (impossible - without your help)

So there is the challenge.

If you can point me in the right direction or better still email me a
gif I'll be eternally greatful (well, until the end of the month 
anyway)

Cheerz

Gez
-- 

Cheerz

Gez
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              XTC lyric No.3... It seems you would say I was too soft hearted
      -m--------                If you made a dunce cap, I'd don it
    ---mmm------Pyramid         People will always be tempted to wipe their feet
  -----mmmmmm---Technology      On anything with WELCOME written on it
-------mmmmmmmm-                ("Snowman", from English Settlement)
================================================================================
gez@pyra.co.uk             Gez Norris, Pyramid Technolgy Ltd, Pyramid House,
(+44) 252 373035           Solartron Rd, Farnborough, Hants, England,  GU14 7PL
================================================================================
From: Charles_Laine@CCIS.BAYLOR.EDU (Charles Laine)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: I, Borg... An observation
Date: 31 Aug 92 20:17:54 GMT
Organization: Baylor University
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1a2
X-Posted-From: lainec.baylor.edu
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In "I, Borg", a heavy emphasis was placed on the fact that Hugh did not
have a singular identity.  He always referred to "himself" as we.  This
theme was continually reinforced until the Climax with Locutus when Hugh
said "No, I am Hugh".  Picard was astonished that the Borg referred to
himself in the singular.

After recently watching this episode, it was noted that early on, when
Geordi and Bev were telling Hugh their names, Hugh responded by saying
"Do I have a name?"  This was well before the events unfolded giving Hugh
his singular identity.  How could they make such a goof?  To me, it
really weakens the impact of the whole episode.  Maybe I'm over-reacting,
or maybe I should get a life. 

Perhaps there is a logical explanation for Hugh saying the word "I"
before he really meant it.   

Charles Laine
Baylor University
From: johnnyp@HALDI.LCS.MIT.EDU (Johnny Piscitello)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Was TOS really that bad? (Re: TOS actors)
Date: 3 Sep 92 22:43:24 GMT
Organization: MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Originator: johnnyp@HALDI.LCS.MIT.EDU


In article <1992Sep1.185303.1511@bnlux1.bnl.gov>, schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:
|> >>>In TOS there have been characters as you and me they have been
|> >>>identificable
|> 
|> Well, they certainly were...predictable.  As in predictable television
|> personality stereotypes.  No better or no worse than the characters that
|> we see on TNG.  I think the main difference is that the TNG characters
|> are so much more _politically correct_, which tends to make them a
|> little blander.
|> 
|> >>In all the years of watching TOS, never did I find myself relating to
|> >>characters.  The show was pure sci-fi enjoyment.
|> 
|> I agree completely here.  Who among us is willing to stand up and say
|> "yes, Kirk inspired me because I could see so much of myslef in him"?
|> They merely served as good, servicable characters that could support
|> stories successfully.
|> 

	I think what made TOS so appealing was The Big Three - Kirk, Spock, 
McCoy. You take the chemistry they had away and you lose alot. You also
have to remember what a HUGE appeal Spock had at the time - he *was* the show.
You never saw a pointy-eared guy who tried to hide his emotions and 
talked of logic all the time. He was and still remains one of the most
mysterious, frustrating, and entertaining characters I've ever seen
in any medium.

	At the same time, no one will say Patrick Stewart is anything but
a tour de force on TMG - The Inner Light should have made hime worthy
of an *Oscar* (much less an emmy), IMHO. And Data is an *excellent*
character as well. 

	What TNG lacks is the chemistry that TOS had - you feel
like everyone's so stiff with each other. Maybe that's a consequence of the 
way the characters are written - you would expect Picard to run a more formal and
professional environment than Kirk, and as a result the characters are stiff
and professional alot of the time.

	However, I thought the TOS second-stringers like Checkov and Scotty were
more colorful than the blandness of Dr. Crusher (sure, some righteous ethics
there) or Geordi (some occasionally witty remarks, but he's just a nice
guy). TOS had an edge and a chemistry that was undeniable. IMHO, folks who call
these old character "passable" are missing the warmth and friendship TOS's
characters had.

Johnny P.  . . .. .....  . . . .. .   . ...  . . .           .. ..........
MIT_LCS  .    . . . .         ..      .......  .....   . .........  .  ...
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: keiner@earthview.cms.udel.edu (Louis Keiner)
Subject: Name that Episode.
Reply-To: keiner@earthview.cms.udel.edu
Organization: Marine Studies, University of Delaware
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 14:51:17 GMT

I can't remember.....what was the name of the episode(s) which featured
Spock on TNG?

Thanks,
Lou


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current