HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: map@BBN.Com (Mike Patton)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.apps
Subject: Simple App. to display text?
Date: 16 Dec 92 13:30:55
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Distribution: world
Reply-To: Incoming Replies <MAP=Reply@BBN.Com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: songlines.bbn.com

I'm looking for a simple application that can sit at the end of a
pipeline, collect the output and then popup a window showing the text.
I heard someone mention such a beast once.  Of course, now that I have
a reason to want it, I can't remember or find the reference...  I
looked through the contrib index on Export, but nothing looked
promising.  Anyone know of such a thing?

            __
  /|  /|  /|  \     Michael A. Patton
 / | / | /_|__/     DSI Network Engineering
/  |/  |/  |atton   Bolt Beranek and Newman

P.S.  This is for use in some scripts that get triggered off things on
my display.  When I was at MIT, I hacked this by using Zephyr to send
the results to me, but now that I've moved to a new job, I should get
the "right" tool for the job.
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.apps,vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
From: wasser@ranger.enet.dec.com (ranger::wasser)
Subject: DECnet object PCX$SERVER is out of date?
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 05:00:19 GMT
X-Posted-Via: NEWS-NOTES gateway (a hack!)

> Using eXcursion V1.? on a PC, we're trying to run an Xapplication (dxclock)
> over DECnet on the Ultrix server and get the error message:
> 
> Application not found in host "dxclock"
> 
> Defining the application as /usr/bin/dxclock produces the same error.

	It could be that you have the wrong version of PCX_SERVER on your
	Ultrix machine.  The version that ships with PATHWORKS for Ultrix
	(for use by PC DECwindows Motif) is an earlier version and does
	not support the protocol version used by eXcursion for Windows.

	Check your eXcursion documentation for instructions on how to
	install a new PCX_SERVER (DECnet object PCX$SERVER).  The version
	shipped with eXcursion for Windows V1.1 (and V1.0) is backward
	compatible with PC DECwindows Motif V4.1.


Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.apps,comp.unix.ultrix
From: shibuya@bl.applicon.slb.com (Hiroto Shibuya)
Subject: XVTDL 3.1 with Xview3 on DECstation
Reply-To: shibuya@bl.applicon.slb.com
Organization: Applicon; Billerica, MA (USA)
Distribution: comp
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 01:28:18 GMT

I obtained xview3-ultrix.4.2-mips.tar.Z from
gatekeeper.dec.com:/pub/DEC, and built XVTDL 3.1 against it.  To my
surprise, it built without single error nor warning at the first shot.
But unfortunately when I run it, I get the following errors.

	XView warning: Cannot load font \
		'-b&h-lucida-medium-r-*-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-*-*' \
		(Font package)
	XView warning: Cannot load font \
		'-b&h-lucida-medium-r-normal-sans-*-120-*-*-*-*-*-*' \
		(Font package)
	XView error: Cannot open connection to \
		window server: :0.0 (Server package)

Usually it is tribial to fix "Cannot load font" with X application but
it seems to be somewhere deep down in Xview, and since xview3-ultrix
doesn't come with any source nor documentation, I don't have a clue.
Before I start getting xview source distribution and start digging
into it, I like to know if anybody have Xvtdl working with this
configuration, and give me quick workaround for it. 

My DECstation is running Ultrix 4.2A and all X stuff is out from
Ultrix.  Do I need R5?  I'm running mwm for window manager, if that
matters.  Do I have to run "olwm"?

Please e-mail me your reply.  Thank you.

					Hiroto Shibuya
			
					Applicon Inc.
					Billerica, MA
					U.S.A.



Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.apps,comp.apps.spreadsheets
From: alans@ll.mit.edu (Alan Jay Stein)
Subject: Re: @ext() dead in sc/ss/xspread ?
Followup-To: comp.apps.spreadsheets
Organization: MIT/Lincoln Lab - Radars R Us
Date: 18 Dec 92 14:40:29

In newsgroup comp.windows.x.apps, bardo@ief-paris-sud.fr (Bardo Muller) writes:

Bardo> I'd like to call a external (c/fortran/unix) function.  In the
Bardo> doc this is @ext(e,x), e being the called function and x being
Bardo> the parameter to be passed.  All I got so far is <illegal
Bardo> numerical value> or something like that. The behavior is quite
Bardo> similar in the above mentioned programs.

Bardo> Someone who got it running ?

Assuming you've got hello (K&R's famous "hello, world") somewhere in
your path, pop this in a file and load it into whatever version of sc
you use:

# This data file was generated by the Spreadsheet Calculator.
# You almost certainly shouldn't edit it.

set extfun
label A0 = @ext("hello",1)
goto A0

Hope that helps you out. BTW, I use sc 6.19 - Does anyone know if
there are more recent versions around, or if the X-based ones are past
6.1 yet?
--
Alan J.Stein             MIT/Lincoln Laboratory             alans@ll.mit.edu

"Good afternoon, this is your captain speaking.  I would like to remind you 
that according to FAA regulations, this flight has been declared a non smoking 
flight.  If you absolutely must light up, you are invited to step outside."
From: swlodin@kocrsv01.delcoelect.com (Steve Lodin)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.apps
Subject: xmail 1.4 on HP-UX anyone?
Date: 18 Dec 92 17:08:24 GMT
Organization: Delco Electronics Corp.
Originator: swlodin@kocrsw15


I have xmail running on my Suns and I wanted to get it going on the
HPs (HP 9000s400 and HP 9000s700 running HP-UX 8.x).  I got it to
compile and link without errors, but the executable fails with the
same error on both architectures.

[66] kocrsw18: ./xmail
xmail: Regular expression too long (item 0).
[67] kocrsw18:

It seems like it may be a BSD vs. SysV regular expression problem and
since HP-UX tries to emulate both, it will compile.  Since I haven't
done regex programming before, I got lost in the source.  Has anyone
got this program working on HP-UX?

I used the following defines:
USE_DIRENT = -DUSE_DIRENT
MAILBOX_DIR = -DMAILBOX_DIRECTORY=\"/usr/mail\"
DEF_VISUAL = -DDEFAULT_VISUAL=\"/usr/bin/vi\"
DEF_MAILER = -DDEFAULT_MAILER=\"/usr/bin/mailx\"

I had to add -lBSD to resolve sigvec().

(Of course, I had to fix the makefile with the HP location of
the X11R4 includes and libs :-)

Thanks for any help!!


Steve
-- 
Steve Lodin	Internet: swlodin@kocrsv01.delcoelect.com  UUCP: deaes!swlodin

#include	<standard.disclaimer>
#include	<fancy.pseudo.graphics>
From: rob@icarus.ssd.loral.com (Rob Riepel)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Automatically changing fonts in Xterm
Date: 15 Dec 92 23:26:22 GMT
Organization: Space Systems/Loral


  When I use the VTxxx escape code to change DECterm from 80 to 132
  characters, it switches to a compressed font that allows me to see
  all 132 characters on my screen.  When I issue the code to change
  back to 80 columns, it switches back to the original font.

  I have set up XTerm resources in my .Xdefaults file so that I can
  change to the compressed font by picking it from the "VT fonts"
  menu, or with a function key.  However, duplicating the nifty
  behavior of DECterm seems to be beyond me at this point.

  So the question is:

    In Xterm, is there a way to automatically switch fonts when
    changing from 80 to 132 columns and back?

  ..rob (rob@icarus.ssd.loral.com)
From: sean@cs.tamu.edu (Sean Graves)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Bad drawable error
Date: 15 Dec 1992 02:09:08 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: solar.tamu.edu

I have all of a sudden started getting a "bad drawable" error from
the X server when I try to do anything with the windows of my X
program.  At one point everything was working fine...I had created
a drawing area and a pixmap and was drawing into them and copying
between them and everything was fine.  Then at one point (I really 
have no idea what I did to trigger this) I started getting a "bad
drawable" error when I tried to do any of these things.  The only
drawable that I don't get an error on is the root window (which I
don't want to use obviously).  I have even broken out small sections
of code and the problem persists.  Any ideas?  Please let me know.
Thanks.

Sean Graves
sean@cs.tamu.edu

Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: linda@cs.su.oz.au (Linda Distributed Language)
Subject: 32K or 16M colours?
Organization: Basser Dept of Computer Science, University of Sydney, Australia
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 22:16:08 GMT

Is anybody working on X servers for cards which display 32K or 16M colours,
like the 2theMax et4000 based card and other extended et4000 cards?
(the 2theMax will do up to 1280x1024x16, 1024x768x256, 800x600x32K)


Thanks for any info,

	David Monro
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix,comp.os.linux
From: dwex@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (david.e.wexelblat)
Subject: Re: Xwd, Xmag fail in Linux binary distribution under X386mono
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 17:49:48 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.230707.12980@colorado.edu> drew@caesar.cs.colorado.edu (Drew Eckhardt) writes:
> BUGREPORT :
> 
> I'm running XFree 1.2 under Linux, with the X386mono server 
> at 800x600 resolution on a Trident 8900b, libc.4.2.so.
> 
> When I use Xmag, or Xwd, the images are scrambled.  
> 
> -- 
> Boycott AT&T for their absurd anti-BSDI lawsuit. | Drew Eckhardt
> Condemn Colorado for Amendment Two.		 | drew@cs.colorado.edu
> Use Linux, the fast, flexible, and free 386 unix |  

There are bunches of bugs in the X386mono server.  All of these are
fixed in the next release.  I can't tell you for certain when that will
be; we are discussing it, and it's not too far off.

Sorry that we can't be more helpful, but with last weekend's storm
knocking me out for several days, and then several days this week of
lost communication in our main archive/mail hub (physics.su.oz.au), and
people's vacation coming up, things are a littel confused. :->

--
David Wexelblat <dwex@mtgzfs3.att.com>  (908) 957-5871
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 200 Laurel Ave - 3F-428, Middletown, NJ  07748

"The meaning of life?  That's simple.  Try to be happy, try not to hurt
 other people, and hope to fall in love."  -- Mallory Keaton
From: sscalsk@nswc-wo.? (Stanley Scalsky)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix
Subject: xfree startup
Date: 17 Dec 92 17:51:12 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: NSWC White Oak

Can anyone provide a pointer on the following:

what mode/resolution/clock does the intro screen using when starting?

I have xfree1.1 running with good viewable 640x480, 800x600 and 1024x768
modes under linux .99, but what I suppose is the intro screen is always
unreadable. I am supposing that the intro screen is in black and white
only because I can detect no color. Anyway after that screen clears my
main mode locks in and everything is perfect. Any hints?

-= stan     sscalsk@nswc-wo.navy.mil
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: fritzz@lamont.ldgo.columbia.edu (fritz zaucker)
Subject: Problem with running XFree86, no screens found
Originator: fritzz@ko.ldgo.columbia.edu
Organization: Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory, Columbia University, New
	York
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 22:22:35 GMT


Hi,

I just tried to run the pre-compiled X386 server from the XFree86
(from blancmange.ma.utexas.edu) on a ISC 2.02 box. Programs (I tried
xlogo) worked fine, but the server gave me the following message (I
ran it with 'X386 vt06':


XFree86 Version 1.1 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 5000)
Configured drivers:
  VGA256 (256 colour SVGA):
      et4000, et3000, pvga1, gvga, ati, tvga8900
(using VT number 6)
 
VGA256: pvga1 (mem: 512k numclocks: 14)
VGA256:   clocks: 25 28 59 72 78 71 52 64 13 14 34 36 40 33
VGA256: Too little memory for all resolutions
 
        *** None of the configured devices was detected.***
 
 
Fatal server error:
no screens found




Can anybody help?

Thanks very much,

Fritz
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix,comp.unix.bsd
From: dwex@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (david.e.wexelblat)
Subject: Re: [386BSD] Xfree86, XS3 Mouse configuration
Organization: AT&T
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 00:50:08 GMT

In article <BzGynG.E3J@NeoSoft.com> karl@NeoSoft.com (Karl Lehenbauer) writes:
> In article <1992Dec18.103520.4811@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE>
> roell@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Thomas Roell) flamed Amancio for writing:
> >>I am the author of XS3. Please send me your Xconfig and relax because
> >>we fixed this bug for XFree86 and ported XFree86 to 386bsd.
> 
> While I have the utmost respect for Roell's contributions, I am saddened
> that he chose to flame Amancio like that.
> 

As are we all.

> Amancio has contributed a lot to making X go under 386BSD.  I exchanged
> email with him several times in the process of getting X up and he 
> always gave detailed responses with amazingly short turnaround times.
> 

Can't argue with that.

> And I do not believe he was trying to steal credit from anyone.  In the
> 386BSD world, Amancio is *the* X windows expert, at least among those
> actively posting.  He created the executables almost everyone uses.
> He posted to offer help to a guy who was having an X problem
> *on 386BSD*.  And that, I believe, is what he was trying to communicate --
> that he was the guy to talk to to get the problem fixed.

I find this amusing, as Rich Murphey (rich@rice.edu) is the 386BSD
representative on the XFree86 Core Team.  He answers most of the X queries
in comp.unix.bsd that are not specific to XS3 (along with Amancio and
David Dawes, in many cases).  And Rich provided the XFree86 1.1 distribution 
for 386BSD.

Please note - I'm not trying to take ANYTHING away from Amancio.  It's
just that Rich's contributions to XFree86, and support of 386BSD, are
very large, and tend to be completely overlooked.  Amancio has been
concentrating on XS3, and Rich has done ALL of the XFree86 work for the
last many months.  So please give credit where it's due.  Amancio's
work is great, but so is Rich's.

> 
> So please, a little more kindness.  We are all on the same team.

Amen to the former.  You will, unfortunately, get far too much argument
about the latter.

> -- 
> -- Email info@NeoSoft.com for info on getting interactive Internet access.
> "In a minute, I'll burp up your droid."


--
David Wexelblat <dwex@mtgzfs3.att.com>  (908) 957-5871
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 200 Laurel Ave - 3F-428, Middletown, NJ  07748

"The meaning of life?  That's simple.  Try to be happy, try not to hurt
 other people, and hope to fall in love."  -- Mallory Keaton
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix,comp.unix.bsd
From: karl@NeoSoft.com (Karl Lehenbauer)
Subject: Re: [386BSD] Xfree86, XS3 Mouse configuration
Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 19:11:39 GMT

In article <1992Dec18.103520.4811@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE>
roell@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Thomas Roell) flamed Amancio for writing:
>>I am the author of XS3. Please send me your Xconfig and relax because
>>we fixed this bug for XFree86 and ported XFree86 to 386bsd.

While I have the utmost respect for Roell's contributions, I am saddened
that he chose to flame Amancio like that.

Amancio has contributed a lot to making X go under 386BSD.  I exchanged
email with him several times in the process of getting X up and he 
always gave detailed responses with amazingly short turnaround times.

And I do not believe he was trying to steal credit from anyone.  In the
386BSD world, Amancio is *the* X windows expert, at least among those
actively posting.  He created the executables almost everyone uses.
He posted to offer help to a guy who was having an X problem
*on 386BSD*.  And that, I believe, is what he was trying to communicate --
that he was the guy to talk to to get the problem fixed.

So please, a little more kindness.  We are all on the same team.
-- 
-- Email info@NeoSoft.com for info on getting interactive Internet access.
"In a minute, I'll burp up your droid."
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: raymond@es.ele.tue.nl (Raymond Nijssen)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix
Subject: Anyone got XFree86 running on a Trident 9000?
Date: 15 Dec 92 09:22:02 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands


A collegue has a SVGA adapter with a T9000 (trident?) chip. He thinks it
should be T8900 compatible, because Windoze uses the 8900 driver, but he can't
get XFree86 running.

So here's his question: is the T9000 backward compatible, or does it require a
whole new driver for XFree86? Or, did anybody succeed in getting XFree86-1.1
running with this adapter, and if so, what should he do?

Thanks,
-Raymond

--
Raymond Nijssen             | Eindhoven University of Techology
       phone: +31-40-473373 | Department of Electrical Engineering
       fax:   +31-40-464527 | Design Automation Section (ES),  room EH 7.16
"WP is for morons"          | PO. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: andys@picard.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Andy Say)
Subject: X to work on ATI Ultra Pro..
Organization: Bellcore
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 19:36:01 GMT

   Okay I am sure this has been asked numerous times and if there is a FAQ
for this group and this question is answered in it can someone point me to
the FAQ.  The question being...  I am trying to get X running under Linux
with an ATI Ultra Pro with no success does anyone have an Xconfig setup for
the Ultra Pro with a 15" Crystal Scan monitor on my Gateway machine?
I am using the X package from the SLS distribution, do I need to get the
X8514 configuration?

Andy

-- 
*****************************************************************************
* Andy Say                          *  Place witty comment here.            *
* Bell Communications Research      *      andys@seas.bellcore.com          *
*****************************************************************************
* Bellcore doesn't pay me enough to speak for them.                         *
*****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix,comp.unix.bsd
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Subject: Re: [386BSD] Xfree86, XS3 Mouse configuration
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 05:17:23 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.175453.29962@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> dwex@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (david.e.wexelblat) writes:
>In article <CONKLIN.92Dec16131542@talisman.kaleida.com> conklin@kaleida.com writes:
>> I have a serial Logitech Mouseman and Orchid F1280 which I am trying
>> to use with Xfree86 and XS3 on my 386BSD system.
>> 
>> I have video working fine, but I am having trouble configuring the
>> mouse.  Specifying "Logitech" in Xconfig doesn't work.
>> 
>> I started trying all of the different mouse types, and "Microsoft"
>> works well (even the middle button, I thought Microsft Mice only had
>> two) with X386mono, but not with XS3.  
>> 
>



Hi,

I am the author of XS3. Please send me your Xconfig and relax because
we fixed this bug for XFree86 and ported XFree86 to 386bsd.

Generally, speaking I am the only person supporting XS3 for 386bsd 
and very few have benn problems reported. At any rate, in the future
just mail me. You will probably get a relevant answer to your problems
or questions.


	This is live message brought to you by X S 3 V L B

Amancio






-- 
Amancio Hasty           |  
Home: (415) 495-3046    |  ftp-site depository of all my work:
e-mail hasty@netcom.com	|  sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix,comp.unix.sysv386,news.answers
From: dwex@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (david.e.wexelblat)
Subject: Re: xfree startup
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:10:26 GMT

In article <SSCALSK.92Dec17125112@nswc-wo.?> sscalsk@nswc-wo.? (Stanley Scalsky) writes:
> Can anyone provide a pointer on the following:
> 
> what mode/resolution/clock does the intro screen using when starting?
> 
> I have xfree1.1 running with good viewable 640x480, 800x600 and 1024x768
> modes under linux .99, but what I suppose is the intro screen is always
> unreadable. I am supposing that the intro screen is in black and white
> only because I can detect no color. Anyway after that screen clears my
> main mode locks in and everything is perfect. Any hints?
> 
> -= stan     sscalsk@nswc-wo.navy.mil

What's going on is the device probes.  This causes lots of register toggling,
essentially stepping though a bunch of pseudo-modes while it tries to figure 
out what hardware you've got.  Once it identifies your hardware, the
unreadable garbage is whatever is in the SVGA memory (i.e. random), until
the rest of the server has finished initializing, and brings up the
checkerboard background.

You can reduce the probe time by specifying, chipset, clocks, memory
etc in the Xconfig file (i.e. so it doesn't have to probe).  It's usually
best to let the server probe, to find out what the parameters should be,
then put those parameters in your Xconfig file.  You obviously don't want
to do this if you intend to use your Xconfig file in multiple configurations.

The next release of the server will blank the screen instead of displaying
the random garbage.  I hope this explains what's going on.

--
David Wexelblat <dwex@mtgzfs3.att.com>  (908) 957-5871
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 200 Laurel Ave - 3F-428, Middletown, NJ  07748

"The meaning of life?  That's simple.  Try to be happy, try not to hurt
 other people, and hope to fall in love."  -- Mallory Keaton
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix,comp.unix.bsd
From: roell@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Thomas Roell)
Subject: Re: [386BSD] Xfree86, XS3 Mouse configuration
	<1992Dec18.103520.4811@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE>
	<BzGynG.E3J@NeoSoft.com> <1992Dec19.005008.5927@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
Organization: Inst. fuer Informatik, Technische Univ. Muenchen, Germany
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 10:49:55 GMT

>> While I have the utmost respect for Roell's contributions, I am saddened
>> that he chose to flame Amancio like that.
>
>As are we all.

I love to see this happen that Amancio turns everything I say into the
opposite and against me personally. And also note that I did said any word
about my contributions here, this is expilicitly about somebody elses
contributions, which I'm really missing named.

What drives me really crazy, most of them time when he posts something,
he doesn't answer the question asked (see this recent ET4000 vs. ET4000/W32
thread) instead he tells everybody how great his XS3 is. Besides this, read
carefully his reply to my posting. What I said was basically:

        - He talk on the net as if he was the only one doing XS3 alone
        - The S3's graphics eingine differes only in one register from
          a 8514/A

What he answered was:

        - The README contains other names
        - The S3's SVGA registers differ from that of a 8514/A (which is
          natural since the 8514/A has no SVGA registers)

See, what I mean ? There is no relation between questioning and anserwering.
That's one my crititcs.

>Please note - I'm not trying to take ANYTHING away from Amancio.  It's
>just that Rich's contributions to XFree86, and support of 386BSD, are
>very large, and tend to be completely overlooked.  Amancio has been
>concentrating on XS3, and Rich has done ALL of the XFree86 work for the
>last many months.  So please give credit where it's due.  Amancio's
>work is great, but so is Rich's.

Implicitely you all seem to strengthen only my point here. Amancio's work 
on XS3 is really great, not doubt about this. But one should also see behind
the curtain and see there that XS3 is based on a working 8514/A server. 
And doing the 8514/A server from scratch is much more work and deserves
much more credits than 'just' doing the hw specific initialisation of
just another mostly 8514/A compatible chipset. I just wanted to remind
people about this. 

- Thomas

PS: My oppionions about Amancio might be pretty much influenced by how
    he articlulates himself in private e-mail communiction about real
    issues. If somebody writes in a technical discussion if he's out of
    arguments 'Fuck you', what would you think of him ?

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Das Reh springt hoch, 				e-mail: roell@sgcs.com
das Reh springt weit,				#include <sys/pizza.h>
was soll es tun, es hat ja Zeit ...
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.i386unix