HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: joseph@panix.com (Joseph R. Skoler)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: Need help with QEMM, Lantastic and Desqview
Date: 11 Sep 92 16:50:44 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC

I've just upgraded to a 386/40, and am running qemm386 v.6.02.

I also run Lantastic 4.0, and I'd like to run DV 2.25.

Regarding the optimization that people on the net have complained about
recently, I, too, am disatisfied with it.

However, I don't think I can do a better job by hand.

What I'm having problems doing is:

Loading all of Lantastic into high ram (lanbios2, redir and server).
the first two programs get loaded high, but not the third, which,
when attempted, responds with a "no high memory available--loading low."

And, even without running lantastic at all, I can't seem to get xdv ro
load.  dv.exe loads fine, but only leaves about 400K ram for programs.
Xdv.com initiates a qemm error msg and invites me to reboot.

So, I'm looking for help with qemm parameters and hints about dv,xdv
lantastic etc.

Artisoft was no help.

Thanks,


 Joseph R. Skoler

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Preferred:  joseph@kc2yu.panix.com                                         i
|     BITNET:  skohc@cunyvm.bitnet                                            |
|   INTERNET:  ak526@cleveland.freenet.edu                                    |
|   AMPR NET:  kc2yu@kc2yu.ampr.org  [44.68.32.56]  144.91 & 145.59 Mhz, NYC  |
|       PBBS:  kc2yu@nn2z.nj.usa.na                                           |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: bodoh@xraylith.wisc.edu (Daniel J. Bodoh)
Subject: Re: DV/X Apps - An existing FTP site
Organization: Center for X-ray Lithography, UW-Madison
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 14:11:41 GMT

In article <1992Sep09.145923.13281@qdeck.com> goodrich@qdeck.com (Steve Goodrich) writes:
>In article <5163@news.duke.edu> jbrehm@acpub.duke.edu (John Brehm) writes:
>>Well, after a week of fiddling around, I've been able to convert some
>>X apps to DV/X apps.  Is there a particular place to post applications?
>
>Netters:
>  I'm looking into finding a place to put all the ported apps.  Until I

Try anonymous FTP to wsmr-simtel20.army.mil.  CD to pd1:<msdos.dv-x>.
Although it would be nice to have a DV and DVX specific FTP site, SIMTEL20
is a very popular site and offers FTP and email access.  For info on
uploading, send a mail message to Keith Peterson at 
w8sdz@rigel.acs.oakland.edu.
-- 
Dan Bodoh
Grad Student
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: burge@qdeck.com (Bill Burge)
Subject: Re: Where are the DV/X libs via FTP?
Organization: Quarterdeck Office Systems, Santa Monica CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1992 15:36:21 GMT

In article <1992Sep01.211429.11498@sandr.COM> dlucy@sandr.COM (Douglas Lucy) writes:
>I'd like to grab the just-announced DV/X libs and GNU compiler.
>Can someone point me to the FTP site & path?
>

barnacle.erc.clarkson.edu

~ftp/pub/msdos/djgpp/qddvx100.zip

Bill	burge@qdeck.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: books@fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu (Roger Books)
Subject: Re: X fonts  and DV
Organization: FSU Physics Dept.
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 92 17:55:10 GMT

In article <gebzfba00WBFRbI10K@andrew.cmu.edu> mp52+@andrew.cmu.edu (Matthew Edward Patton) writes:
>Path: mailer.cc.fsu.edu!uflorida!mlb.semi.harris.com!darwin.sura.net!udel!rochester!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!mp52+
>From: mp52+@andrew.cmu.edu (Matthew Edward Patton)
>Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
>Subject: X fonts  and DV
>Message-ID: <gebzfba00WBFRbI10K@andrew.cmu.edu>
>Date: 29 Aug 92 22:32:07 GMT
>Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
>Lines: 7

>This seems to be my favorite topic of choice.  Does anyone know the
>purpose/usage of the fonts.dir and fonts.a?? files?  They seem to
>include a bunch of commands about how to use them.  How do I make DV/X
>use newly downloaded .snf fonts ?  I especially want the cursors to be
>corrected.

Put the fonts in the directory you want them. (I think there is a standard,
but I don't know what it is.)

run MKFNTDIR.EXE  in that directory.

That's it.


>Thanks

You're welcome.

(Do I hear FAQ, anyone?)

		Roger
		books@fsunuc.physics.fsu.edu
From: ucgadkw@ucl.ac.uk (Dominik Wujastyk)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: Re: os2 vs desqview
Date: 13 Sep 92 09:32:54 GMT
Organization: Bloomsbury Computing Consortium

ted@dgbt.doc.ca (Ted Grusec) writes:

>In article <18qv33INN2jq@agate.berkeley.edu> ucbked@athena (Earl H. Kinmonth) writes:
>>given the rapidly falling prices of 386/486 machines, is there
>>any set of compelling reasons for using desqview rather than os2?
>>

>One reason, compelling only in the light of the programs you want to
>run, is that programs written for Window 3.1 will not run under OS/2,
>only those written for 3.0 will.  Under Desqview, you run whatever
>Windows version you want directly, and therefore Desqview is totally
>neutral about windows program versions.

Then again, you can't run OS/2 programs under DesqView.  :-)  And
OS/2 will be upgraded shortly to run Windows 3.1 programs, although
the longer term support for evolving Windows support is less sure.

Given the spec of the machines being bought by Earl's department, I 
would definitely go with OS/2: it's a *real* multitasking operating 
system with multiple *protected* sessions.  

Dominik
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: malcolm@muir.demon.co.uk ("Malcolm S. Muir")
Subject: Re: Experiences with QDPMI (DPMI for QEMM)? 
Distribution: world
Organization: Muir
Reply-To: malcolm@muir.demon.co.uk
X-Mailer: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.18)
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 12:52:05 +0000


In article <1992Sep13.010438.11121@kronos.arc.nasa.gov> raymond@kronos.arc.nasa.gov writes:

>Has anyone used the recently posted DPMI enhancement to QEMM?

Yes to run MS C7 under qemm386.

No apparent problem so far.

--
===================
Malcolm S. Muir                       EMAIL: malcolm@muir.demon.co.uk
Sunderland, England                   CIX: mmuir BIX: mmuir CSERVE: 100012,31
===================
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview,comp.bbs.misc
From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Subject: Re: When to load SHARE
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 17:44:47 GMT
Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc.

gkendall@ncr-mpd.FtCollins.NCR.COM (Guy Kendall) writes:

>I am running DOS 5, and using the SHARE.EXE that came with DOS 5. Are you
>saying I don't need SHARE with DOS 5?

If you are using SHARE because you think you need it in order to access
a partition larger than 32 MB, then no, you don't need SHARE.

If you are using SHARE to keep different programs from stepping on each
other's files while running concurrently, then YES, you need SHARE.

-- 
#ifdef TRUE         | Fuzzy Fox                  fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0   | a.k.a. David DeSimone      an207@cleveland.freenet.edu
#define  FALSE  1   |
#endif              |         How's my posting?  Call 1-800-ALT-FLAME
From: spit@neuro.duke.edu (Michael Burdick)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: Re: DVC or DVX
Date: 11 Sep 92 21:16:45 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

In article <BuEynx.DHJ@nic.umass.edu> dtodd@titan.ucc.umass.edu (David M. Todd) writes:
>
>I simply want to multitask DOS programs (no X-windows or connectivity
>at this point), is there any point to my using DVX rather than DVC? 
>I'm thinking of upgrading to a 486 with SVGA and a graphic card.  I'm
>not clear after reading the FAQ is DVX bascially DVC with some add-ons,
>i.e. is the base program the same?

The main advantage of DVX over regular DV is the ability to have scalable
text sessions under DVX.  You can have multiple full screen sessions going
this way and it works nicely.  If you do spring for a fancy VGA card,
be aware that DVX supports only certain cards.  DGIS and 8514 cards are
supported and there may be others.  Check the FAQ.  A disadvantage of DVX
is that any (non X) graphics session takes over full screen (i.e. graphics
are not windowed).  Regular DV will window graphics such that you can
have text and graphics windows on the screen at the same time.

So to answer your last question, DVX is DVC with some add-ons and deletions!
Basically, it is a different program.

Hope this helps.
Mike Burdick
mburdick@molecular.unmc.edu
From: goodrich@qdeck.com (Steve Goodrich)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: Re: undefined symbol...
Date: 14 Sep 92 15:58:23 GMT
Organization: Quarterdeck Office Systems, Santa Monica CA

In article <HABA.92Sep11201315@lesti.hut.fi> haba@lesti.hut.fi (Harri "Haba" Suomalainen) writes:
>In article <rmbult01.716178656@starbase.spd.louisville.edu> rmbult01@orion.spd.louisville.edu (Robert M. Bultman) writes:
>
>   I am listing the libs in this order: -lxaw -lxmu -lxt -lxext -lm -lX11
>
>Check they are not symbols in the libsym.a. If so, add -lsys after -lx.
>
>   I also have been unable to compile the demo xeyes which comes with the
>   freebie stuff.  When I try, the machine locks.
>
>Machines lock for lots of reasons under gcc 1.08. Moving mouse etc..

Some things to remember when you're using the DJGPP compiler:  In the file
DOCS/README, under REQUIREMENTS (around line 30), there is the statement:

   Requirements:

   A 80386-based IBM compatible PC or PS/2, approximately 4-5Mb of hard
   drive space, and 512K RAM.  Available extended (or expanded under VCPI)
   memory is strongly recommended.

I've taken this to mean "512K Conventional RAM available."  It's taken a bit
of work, but I'm able to get 512K available in a DOS window for my compiling.
This isn't a "gotcha" from QOS, this is simply a requirement of the
compiler.

Second, and related to the above request:  Make sure you have all the
proper environment variables set up.  In this case, specifically the
LIBRARY_PATH.  In my system this points to C:\UTIL\LANG\DJGPP/lib.  These
are set by a DJGPP.BAT file from your DVX directory.

  -- Steve G.
  Quarterdeck Office Systems
  goodrich@qdeck.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview,comp.bbs.misc
From: cb@wixer.cactus.org (Cyberspace Buddha)
Subject: Re: When to load SHARE
Organization: Real/Time Communications
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 22:40:09 GMT

In article <2243@ncr-mpd.FtCollins.NCR.COM> gkendall@ncr-mpd.FtCollins.NCR.COM (Guy Kendall) writes:
>In article <1992Sep10.133743.4265@wixer.cactus.org> cb@wixer.cactus.org (Cyberspace Buddha) writes:
>>
>>IMO, you should move up to DOS 5 & get rid of share altogether.
>
>I am running DOS 5, and using the SHARE.EXE that came with DOS 5. Are you
>saying I don't need SHARE with DOS 5?
>

No, just showing my ignorance of the whole situation.
I don't run any multi-tasking/threading on my machine, and
never try accessing files that are already open when I open
a new shell process.

It is entirely possible tha tI would be better off keeping my
fingers still in areas where my knowledge is, to say tha least, lacking.

A thousand pardons,
cb
From: burge@qdeck.com (Bill Burge)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: Re: How Manifest knows when OPTIMIZE has run
Keywords: Manifest, Optimize
Date: 14 Sep 92 15:23:27 GMT
Organization: Quarterdeck Office Systems, Santa Monica CA

In article <conibear.716222401@cunews> conibear@sol.carleton.ca (Dave Conibear) writes:
>For a change of pace... a problem that is not pressing, and for which
>a solution doesn't really need to be found.
>
>I'm just getting a little annoyed that Manifest's (H)ints always
>include "Run OPTIMIZE which came with QEMM", even after I've just done
>so.  Well, that's not quite true; once, long ago, it had no hints at
>all, but I haven't been able to recreate it.
>
>Does anyone know what mechanism Manifest uses to detect whether
>Optimize has been run?  I'm leaving the .QDK files in my root
>directory intact, but in vain.  Anyone?  Bueller?

If you have High RAM and
  1) There is no HINTDATA.OPT file in the directory from which you're running
     MFT; or
  2) The number or size of your High RAM regions has changed since the
     HINTDATA.OPT file was created (i.e. since you last ran OPTIMIZE); or
  3) You are not in DV and your current CONFIG.SYS or AUTOEXEC.BAT files have
     a different date and/or time than the ones that were around when you
     last ran OPTIMIZE; and one of the following is the case
       A) The current amount of High RAM available is at least 1K more than
          was available the last time you ran OPTIMIZE and you currently have
          some TSR loaded low; or
       B) You have at least 6K High RAM available and you have at least 2K
          less available conventional memory than you did after the last time
          you ran OPTIMIZE.
then the hint is given.  Note that you'll frequently have the hint given if
you're running MFT from a different directory than the one where you run
Optimize.

Bill	burge@qdeck.com

oPTIMIZE.
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: haba@lesti.hut.fi (Harri "Haba" Suomalainen)
Subject: DV/X librarys for djgpp
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Date: 7 Sep 92 20:15:09

As a novice X-programmer I'm a bit confuced with Xt-library. Many routines
in it seem to call some routines not included in libxt.a or any other
library. Should I have some other package as well so I'd be able to use
widgets? (Currently using only qddvx100.zip)

Thanks,
          Harri Suomalainen
--
--
Harri Suomalainen        Harri.Suomalainen@hut.fi       haba@vipunen.hut.fi
From: rmbult01@orion.spd.louisville.edu (Robert M. Bultman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: undefined symbol...
Summary: need help on compiler error
Keywords: programming
Date: 11 Sep 92 02:30:56 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

I have been trying to port the program I am writing for my thesis
to dvx, but I keep getting the same error message when gcc links 
all of the object files:

  source.o: undefined symbol _SomeXSymbol referenced from text segment
	 ^                            ^
	 |                            |- all X symbols used
	 |- source file name (object)

I get this message for each occurance of every X-related function,
type, widget name, etc. for each object file.  Link doesn't seem
to have a problem with any non-X-related library functions.

For flags, I use  -c -D MSDOS.
I am listing the libs in this order: -lxaw -lxmu -lxt -lxext -lm -lX11
Which is what I use on the HP systems (700) at school.
I have looked in the docs which come with dvx and qddvx100.zip stuff,
but can't find any answers.

I also have been unable to compile the demo xeyes which comes with the
freebie stuff.  When I try, the machine locks.

I also have two other unrelated (to the previous questions) questions.

2) How does the MAXMEM(?) variable in the file in the server
affect performance?

3) My machine locks up periodically for no apparent reason.  This
usually happens when I am trying to open another window.  I select open
window (for example) then toolbox, then memory, and then the thing acts
like it is going to open the window, then just hangs there with the
open window menu still "visible".

I have a Gateway 486 with 8meg ram and 121 meg hd.  I have anetwork
driver (actually TSR) running, the QEMM that ships with dvx, and that is
it.  MY QEMM config line looks like:
	device=\QEMM/QEMM.sys RAM exclude:c000-cdff
Apparrentyly, the network driver card has a rom here. (that is a guess.)

Thanks in advance for any replies I might receive.

-rob

-- 
Robert M. Bultman                              |
Speed Scientific School                        |
University of Louisville                       |
Internet: rmbult01@starbase.spd.louisville.edu |
Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.desqview:2962 comp.bbs.misc:901
From: gkendall@ncr-mpd.FtCollins.NCR.COM (Guy Kendall)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview,comp.bbs.misc
Subject: When to load SHARE
Date: 8 Sep 92 14:18:30 GMT
Reply-To: gkendall@ncr-mpd.FtCollins.NCR.COM (Guy Kendall)
Distribution: world
Organization: NCR Microelectronic Products Division

Should the DOS SHARE.EXE program be loaded before Desqview is ran, or
in each window once Desqview is loaded up? The application is running
a BBS that allows multiple nodes. Right now I used this line in my
config.sys: install=c:\dos\share.exe, but want to make sure I have it
right so I don't get corrupted files. I know the BBS requires SHARE, but
it just didn't say how to load it.

Thanks.

-- 
Guy W. Kendall - Applications Engineer            Guy.Kendall@ColoSpgs.NCR.COM
NCR Microelectronic Products Division               Voice: 719-596-5795 x465
1635 Aeroplaza Drive                                  Fax: 719-570-6045
Colorado Springs, CO 80916                            BBS: 719-596-1649 
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: ted@dgbt.doc.ca (Ted Grusec)
Subject: Re: os2 vs desqview
Organization: The Communications Research Centre
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 16:32:23 GMT

In article <1992Sep13.093254.26358@bas-a.bcc.ac.uk> ucgadkw@ucl.ac.uk (Dominik Wujastyk) writes:
>ted@dgbt.doc.ca (Ted Grusec) writes:
>
>>In article <18qv33INN2jq@agate.berkeley.edu> ucbked@athena (Earl H. Kinmonth) writes:
>>>given the rapidly falling prices of 386/486 machines, is there
>>>any set of compelling reasons for using desqview rather than os2?
>>>
>
>>One reason, compelling only in the light of the programs you want to
>>run, is that programs written for Window 3.1 will not run under OS/2,
>>only those written for 3.0 will.  Under Desqview, you run whatever
>>Windows version you want directly, and therefore Desqview is totally
>>neutral about windows program versions.
>
>Then again, you can't run OS/2 programs under DesqView.  :-)  And
>OS/2 will be upgraded shortly to run Windows 3.1 programs, although
>the longer term support for evolving Windows support is less sure.
>
>Given the spec of the machines being bought by Earl's department, I 
>would definitely go with OS/2: it's a *real* multitasking operating 
>system with multiple *protected* sessions.  

It won't be long before Windows has true multitasking, etc. (Windows
NT).  One strategy is to buy both Windows and OS/2, try them out,
choose the one to use you now like best, then wait as upgrades comes
out and be ready to shift to the other if the newest upgrade warrants
it.  When you have both, the upgrade costs will be relatively small and you
will be ready for all developments.  In the meantime, you can see, for
the kind of computing you do, and the programs you use, which bests
suits you.  Which is "best" at any moment has no universal answer.
-- 
==========================================================================
Ted Grusec    Communications Research Centre    (Govt. of Canada, DOC)
 3701 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ont.K2H 8S2, CANADA  Internet: ted@dgbt.doc.ca
  Compuserve: 73607,1576  (613) 998 2762   Fax (613) 993 8657
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: hurd@fraser.sfu.ca (Peter L. Hurd)
Subject: revised question about noff.shp
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 02:03:33 GMT

Ooops, the noff.shp is an FAQ, sorry, but I then have a follow-up 
question, if it's in the default wp-pif.dvp, but isn't needed if
you virualize the graphics, is this true of all supplied xx-pif.dvp's
aka dbase?  Can I virtualize the graphics, and dump noff.shp?
What is the advantage of using noff.shp and not virualizing the 
graphics if this is the default setting?
Thanks,

(And if my problem with wp is that there isn't enough memory, why does
it screw up, under the default settings?  How big a file do I have to 
have in wp before if flops under dv?  The file it mangled (a thesis
chapter on heavy deadline pressure it goes with without saying) was
22 pages long.)
Thanks again,

-- 
-- Pete Hurd, hurd@sfu.ca          |"So I've got this 22Meg output file..." |
Behavioural Ecology Research Group |"Yeah, well delete it."                 |
Dept.Biol.Sci., Simon Fraser Univ. |"But how will I know what it says"      |
Burnaby B.C. V5A 1S6 Canada        |"Well, how will you know what it means?"|
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: conibear@sol.carleton.ca (Dave Conibear)
Subject: How Manifest knows when OPTIMIZE has run
Keywords: Manifest, Optimize
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:40:01 GMT

For a change of pace... a problem that is not pressing, and for which
a solution doesn't really need to be found.

I'm just getting a little annoyed that Manifest's (H)ints always
include "Run OPTIMIZE which came with QEMM", even after I've just done
so.  Well, that's not quite true; once, long ago, it had no hints at
all, but I haven't been able to recreate it.

Does anyone know what mechanism Manifest uses to detect whether
Optimize has been run?  I'm leaving the .QDK files in my root
directory intact, but in vain.  Anyone?  Bueller?

Dave Q. Conibear
DQ_Conibear@carleton.ca
conibear@math.carleton.ca

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (George Jetson)
Subject: Re: just getting started.
Reply-To: pynq@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: D. J. Dougherty & Associates
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 19:33:42 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.031410.42999@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> god@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>I once bought a copy of Desqview, tried it out and was totslly
>frustrated in my efforts to mak e it work very well. I currently have
>a 286 laptop with 3 meg of memory, a 286 desktop with 3 meg of memory,
>and another 286 desktop with 1 meg.  All run stacker.  What are the
>things that I should look to to get  Desqview up and spinning?  I've
>talked to folks who have used it with great success on XT's, certainly
>it should work on these 286's.  Also what cache to use with it?
>Smartdrv.exe Norton Cache?  PC Tools?  PC Kwik?  Thanks for any help
>you might come up with. 

I should say at the outset that I feel a little funny giving advice to God,
but then You did ask.

A few comments:
	1) I, too, bought DV, tried it out, wasn't impressed, put it on
	   the shelf, let some time go by, then decided to try it again.
	   The second time around, it made a lot more sense.  So don't
	   be discouraged.
	2) While DV can certainly be used on lesser machines, I would
	   say, that as a practical matter, you really need a 386 in order
	   to give it a fair shake.  Of course, DV is a lot more usable
	   on "lesser hardware" than are some of the other "alternative
	   DOS Operating Environments", which we will not name at this time.
	3) Unless your 286's memory can be configured as ("Genuine,
	   non-imitation, accept no substitutes, honest to goodness, hardware
	   LIM 4.0") expanded memory, you will probably not get much use
	   out of it, other than the HMA.  You can set it up as RAM disk
	   for swapping.
	4) I've been using HyperDisk for some time now - it seems to work.

************************************************************************
A note to new readers:  the weasely :-) symbol is frowned upon in this
group.  Any questions, see Phil Gustafson who will gladly rearrange your
diodes for you.
			- From the AFU FAQ -

	- pynq@quads.uchicago.edu, who is still costing the net
	  hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars, every time he posts -
************************************************************************
From: god@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: just getting started.
Date: 15 Sep 92 03:14:09 CDT
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

I once bought a copy of Desqview, tried it out and was totslly
frustrated in my efforts to mak e it work very well. I currently have
a 286 laptop with 3 meg of memory, a 286 desktop with 3 meg of memory,
and another 286 desktop with 1 meg.  All run stacker.  What are the
things that I should look to to get  Desqview up and spinning?  I've
talked to folks who have used it with great success on XT's, certainly
it should work on these 286's.  Also what cache to use with it?
Smartdrv.exe Norton Cache?  PC Tools?  PC Kwik?  Thanks for any help
you might come up with. 
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview