HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: davisonj@bnr.ca (John Davison)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: ANSI/ISO standard (surprisingly enough!) & extensions
Summary: will someone answer my question?
Keywords: ISO ANSI
Date: 18 Aug 92 19:55:16 GMT
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Richardson, Tx.


        I asked this question before, and no one answered.  Here it comes
again.  Surely one of you readers knows the answer!

        Despite the differences in wording and formatting, are _ISO/IEC_
_9899:1990_(E),_First_Edition_1990-12-15_ and _American_National_Standard_
_X3.159-1989_ different in any way with respect to the language specifications
or implications thereof?

        Do these two documents represent the most current and widespread C
standard(s)?

        Please tell me if the following statement is true: The C programming
language as defined by _ISO/IEC_9899:1990_(E),_First_Edition_1990-12-15_, the C
programming language as defined by _American_National_Standard_X3.159-1989_,
ISO C, and ANSI C are all one and the same thing, with no differences
whatsoever.

        If not true, what are the differences (the major ones, anyway)?

        Followup articles are encouraged.  (Electronic mail is hard for me to
access.)

        Thanks!


-- 
NOTE: I CAN'T SEND/RECEIVE E-MAIL HERE!!!  Use --> davisonj@ecn.purdue.edu <--
      During (roughly) August 20-25, I will be in transit.  Please be patient.
      The opinions and other information contained herein are not necessarily
      representative of Northern Telecom or any of its subsidiaries.
From: tlg@uknet.ac.uk (Tim.Goodwin)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: ANSI/ISO standard (surprisingly enough!) & extensions
Date: 18 Aug 92 16:13:52 GMT
Organization: UKnet

In article <1992Aug18.020102.2965@unix.brighton.ac.uk> amn@vms.brighton.ac.uk
writes:
>The British Standards Institute charges 168 pounds sterling ($330 US),
>[yes, the price is correct - I checked the price list and by phone], for the
>234 pages comprising BS ISO/IEC 9899:1990, (half price for members).
>...

Bizarre.

I recently (27th May 1992) got ANSI X3.159-1989, with rationale, from
BSI for 45 pounds.

Tim.
-- 
perhaps if people had understood fork() better we | ; who am i
wouldn't have threads - Rob Pike.                 | uknet.ac.uk!tlg
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Subject: Re: ANSI/ISO standard (surprisingly enough!) & extensions
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 20:50:31 GMT

In article <1992Aug19.234812.11723@unix.brighton.ac.uk> amn@vms.brighton.ac.uk writes:
>1   It is only applicable to compilers that include a complete ANSI library,
>    often not the case when targetting embedded systems, ...

Not true:  there are several parts to the PH suite, one which tests the
compiler, and one which tests the compiler-plus-libraries (as well as
possible other parts; it's been a long time since I've seen the suite).

>2   It does not check that system constants (#define's) and function prototypes
>    are in the correct header files, ...

Uhm, yes, it does.  It can do things like:

	char *cp;

	main() { if (cp == NULL) return 0; else return 1; }

That will fail.  It can also include a header file, and reference all of the
constants, types, and functions that are supposed to be in that header file.
Remember:  the PH suite checks for things that *should* fail, as well as
things that should pass!

>3   It does not ensure that the compiler defaults to ANSI compliant mode, with
>    language extensions being available only as an option.

That is an implementation detail, and I can guarantee that there are *few*
compilers which will *default* to ANSI:  it's too limited.  One of the
things you configure the PH suite to do is to invoke the compiler the way
you want it to be;

>4   It does not prevent tampering with the input (PH) files to get the desired
>    output.

Nothing will.  Get real.  However, if you claim ANSI conformance, based on
passing the PH test suite, and a customer gets your compiler, and runs it
thruogh the suite, and it fails, don't you think someone is going to make a
bit of noise about that?

>5   It does not reject compilers that accept invalid operations or illegal
>    syntax.

Yes, it does.

>6   It does not test typesafe linkage, where implemented :-)

Not required by ANSI.

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "You can't get lost in in one room, no matter how
sef@kithrup.COM  |  little effort you make to learn your way around."
-----------------+    -- William E Davidsen (william@crd.GE.COM)
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: `Improved' auto-insert.el
Date: 18 Aug 92 22:16:25 GMT
Followup-To: comp.emacs
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: dltest@castle.ed.ac.uk's message of 18 Aug 92 12:14:45 GMT



In article <24942@castle.ed.ac.uk> dltest@castle.ed.ac.uk (Kevin Davidson) writes:
Path: borg!concert!rutgers!sun-barr!olivea!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!dltest

   I tried the autoinsert.el that came with our distribution 
   [GNU Emacs 18.55.1 of Wed Mar  7 1990 on castle (berkeley-unix)]
   written by Charlie Martin, dated 1/7/1988 and wasn't too impressed.

Oh, thank you for the criticism, I don't know how I could have lived
without that.

   I added some stuff to make it a little friendlier and more general:
   ;;; Much hacked about by Kevin Davidson <dltest@castle.ed.ac.uk>
   ;;; 18th August 1992
   ;;; Whole buffer is marked. If auto-insertion is not wanted, ^W will remove
   ;;; it all.
Interestingly, "undo" does the same thing with mine.
   ;;; Now replaces % escapes in inserted file:
....
   ;;; %% is a %

Look into header.el.

     Has this already been done ? If not is anybody interested in trying it
   and offering buggestions before I post it ? 

Sure, send it along.
--
Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am he who walks the States with a barb'd tongue, questioning every
one I meet,/Who are you that wanted only to be told what you knew
before?/ Who are you that wanted only a book to join you in your
nonsense?"  _Leaves of Grass_ xxiii.4.
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: ejh@khonshu.colorado.edu (Edward J. Hartnett)
Subject: small question about going into directories with find-file
Organization: Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 15:39:58 GMT

This is somethng I've been curious about for some time. If I do a
C-x C-f (find file) right after I start emacs, I get Find File: ~/
in the minibuffer, and if I hit return, I get into dired with my
home directory listed. If I then open a file in that directory,
then do a C-x C-f again, I get the same Find File: ~/ in the
minibuffer, but if I hit return, I don't go back into dired, I get
nowhere. I have to edit the minibuffer and remove the / before it
will let me open that directory in dired again. 

This is not a big problem, but I'm wondering why it's happening,
and if there's any way I can set things up such that I won't have
to delete that / in the minibuffer.

-- 
Edward Hartnett			ejh@khonshu.colorado.edu

Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield)
Subject: Re: Question: How to use Emacs to access root-owned files
Organization: Morning Star Technologies
	<BOB.92Aug12120143@volitans.MorningStar.Com>
	<HARDY.92Aug12175216@golem.ps.uci.edu>
Distribution: comp
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 05:05:09 GMT

In article <HARDY.92Aug12175216@golem.ps.uci.edu> hardy@golem.ps.uci.edu (Meinhard E. Mayer (Hardy)) writes:
   I don't know how we lived before Andy Norman made ange-ftp
   available

Before ange-ftp we used ftp-find-file, bone knives, and flint
arrowheads.
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: scotth@hoshi.corp.sgi.com (Scott Henry)
Subject: Re: ??? Standard output into a buffer
Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc, Mountain View, CA
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 21:12:54 GMT


>>>>> In article <oqr90gc@fido.asd.sgi.com>, shankar@sgi.com (Shankar Unni) writes:
shankar> In article <1992Aug19.161217.16223@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> burky@austin.ibm.com writes:
>I'm trying to find a way to execute a program from within my emacs buffer
>such that the standard output of that program is directed to the insertion
>point in my buffer.
>
>The best I've come up with so far is to open a shell buffer, run the program,
>and copy/paste the results.

C-u M-! <command>

will insert the output of <command> into the current buffer at mark.
See the docs for "shell-command".

=-=-=-=
--
 Scott Henry <scotth@sgi.com> / Traveller on Dragon Wings
 Networking Services,        / Help! My disclaimer is missing!
 Silicon Graphics, Inc      / GIGO *really* means: Garbage in, Gospel Out
From: fritz@scipp.UCSC.EDU (Frederick Staats)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Getting the functionality of the XEDIT "all" command in emacs
Date: 14 Aug 92 19:46:34 GMT
Organization: Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics
NNTP-Posting-Host: scipp.ucsc.edu

Does anyone know how to get the functionality of the XEDIT "all"
command inside emacs.  You can use this command to narrow the focus of
what you are editing to any lines that match a general search
function.  So if you were editing a program file and you did "all /else/"
only lines that had an "else" in them would be displayed.  This is
very useful when editing programs and TeX files.  And I would like to
be able to do this within emacs.
-- 
Frederick Staats
fritz@scipp.UCSC.EDU -- (408) 459-3575
Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics
University of California at Santa Cruz
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: stud01@cc4.kuleuven.ac.be (Barbe Albert)
Distribution: world
Date: Tuesday, 18 Aug 1992 11:37:36 +02
Organization: K.U.Leuven - Academic Computing Center
Subject: all.el missing function (Oops)

I forgot to include the function unfold-all.
Here is the complete version (hope it works now)
----------------Cut Here-------------------------
;;
;; all.el v1.01   Bert Barbe   (stud01@cc4.kuleuven.ac.be)
;; use : type          M-x all
;;       then type the pattern ( or just enter to show all lines again)
;;
;; This function uses selective-display and hides lines by changing
;;  the end of the line in control-M
;;
;; comments are allways welcome !

;; all
;;
(defun all ( patern )
  (interactive "sPattern: ")
  (setq selective-display t)
  (if (string-equal patern "")
      (unfold-all)
    (setq selective-display t)
    (let ((modp (buffer-modified-p)))
      (unwind-protect
	  (save-excursion
	    (subst-char-in-region (point-min) (point-max)
				  ?\n ?\^m  t)
	    (goto-char 0)
	    (or (char-equal ?\^m (char-after 1)) (insert-char ?\^m 1))
	    (while  (re-search-forward patern (point-max) t)
	      (save-excursion
		(if (search-backward "\^m" (point-min) t)
		    (progn
		      (delete-char 1 )
		      (insert-char ?\n 1))
		  (message "Something went wrong.Pity.")))
	    )
	  )
	
	(set-buffer-modified-p modp)))))
;;  unfold-all
;; this function was missing in v1.00
;;
(defun unfold-all ()
  (interactive)
  (let ((modp (buffer-modified-p)))
    (unwind-protect
        (subst-char-in-region (point-min) (point-max) ?\^M ?\n  t)
     (set-buffer-modified-p modp))))
----------------Cut Here-------------------------
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Barbe Albert       stud01@cc4.kuleuven.ac.be   (AIX/370)
                   FHGAA98@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be  (VM/CMS)
From: matt@physics.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Highlighting text between mark and point in GNU emacs
Date: 18 Aug 92 16:43:19
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Theoretical Physics Group)
Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.berkeley.edu

Many editors (e.g., CCA Emacs, and VMS Eve) highlight the text that
has been selected for some block operation.

In general I find this a nuisance, but it is occasionally convenient.
Using GNU emacs 18.58, it doesn't look like there is any way to do
this; the display seems to be done by very low-level code.  Have I
missed something?  Is there any way to do this purely in lisp, i.e.,
without changing the C code an recompiling the editor?
--
Matthew Austern              I dreamt I was being followed by a roving band 
(510) 644-2618               of young Republicans, all wearing the same suit,
matt@physics.berkeley.edu    taunting me and shouting, "Politically correct
austern@theorm.lbl.gov       multiculturist scum!"... They were going to make
austern@lbl.bitnet	     me kiss Jesse Helms's picture when I woke up.
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: mcook@fendahl.dev.cdx.mot.com (Michael Cook)
Subject: Re: BAD, bad, bad TABS in emacs
Organization: Motorola Codex, Canton, Massachusetts
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 15:47:11 GMT

kurt@dna.lth.se (Kurt Swanson) writes:

>I would like emacs to rid my life of control-i's.  Does anyone know of
>any emacs means to:

>a: redefine the tab key such that it inserts the right number of
>   spaces, i.e. 1-8 depending on the tab stops and current cursor
>   column

Put this in your ~/.emacs:

  (setq-default indent-tabs-mode nil)

>and/or

>b: search a whole buffer, replacing control-i's with the same scheme
>   of spaces.

  M-< M-> M-x untabify RET

>Any ideas?
>Kurt Swanson, Dept. of Computer Science,
>Lunds universitet.  Kurt.Swanson@dna.lth.se

Michael.
From: burky@austin.ibm.com
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: How to save a macro?
Date: 21 Aug 92 20:41:20 GMT
Organization: IBM Austin
Originator: burky@weburky.austin.ibm.com


If a keyboard macro is made with C-x C-( ... C-x C-), can it be saved in
some way so that it will be defined when emacs starts up again?

Alternatively, Is it possible to define a macro for several keystrokes in 
your .emacs file?


Thanks for any help,

-- 
...........................
Bill Burky
burky@dritter.austin.ibm.com
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: pierson@kukri.mps.mlo.dec.com (dan pierson)
Subject: Re: Key bindings for DECstation
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 14:38:51 GMT

Regarding Key bindings for DECstation; pdchapin@amhux1.amherst.edu (Paul Chapin) adds:
> We're about to significantly increase our use of emacs on a DECstation
> 5000.  Unfortunately, the Ctrl-S combination, used for forward and to
> save the current file, is grabed by the DECstation as a hold screen
> command.  Our intention is to play with the keyboard so another key
> combination does what Ctrl-S is suppose to do.

> The question is, is there any kind of standard about where to move the
> Ctrl-S funcions? We assume that this is a fairly common problem
> for DECstation users and we don't want to go off in a tangent from
> everybody else.

Two options:

1. Run emacs in it's own X11 window (a.k.a. DECwindow).  Ctrl-S and
   Ctrl-Q will work just fine.

2. Ctrl-S ==> Ctrl-\
   Ctrl-Q ==> Ctrl-^

   Do this via keyboard-translate-table:

   Documentation:
   String used as translate table for keyboard input, or nil.
   Each character is looked up in this string and the contents used instead.
   If string is of length N, character codes N and up are untranslated.
--
Dan L. Pierson          Digital Equipment Corporation
pierson@crl.dec.com     Massively Parallel Systems Group
Xref: sparky comp.emacs:2884 comp.sys.dec:4592
From: braun@mailhost.aa.cad.slb.com (Matthew Braun)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs,comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: Remove key on DECstation under Xwindows
Date: 17 Aug 92 12:55:52 GMT
Organization: Schlumberger CAD/CAM; Ann Arbor, Michigan (USA)

In article <1992Aug13.151752.8531> (Matthew Braun) writes:
>Info:  DECstation 5000/200, LK201 keyboard, X11R4, twm or mwm
>
>Can anyone think of a reason the Remove key would send ^[[3~ to a xterm
>window and send nothing to an emacs window?
>

Summary:

The problem described above seemed to be a problem with both the
DECstation's Remove key being defined strange and emacs not supporting all
the keys provided in X include file X11/keysymdef.h.  The emacs source
file x11term.c is where the X KeyPress events are processed, and there you
can follow the program and find out how emacs handles them.

There were two possible solutions:

  1. As almost everyone stated, you can modify the x11term.c source and
recompile, which would be really easy to do after looking at the code.
But I don't administrate the computers here, so I was looking for a way
around doing that.

  2. Another way was to redefine the keyboard with 'xmodmap'.  I just
redefined the Remove key to the Do/Menu/F16 (all equivalent names) key.
This produced the code ^[[29~ which is recognized as a valid key stroke in
emacs.  [Note that this would leave you with two keys the same as defined
in the xmodmap.  But, I also redefined the Do/Menu key to the Caps_Lock
key because I redefined the normal Lock key to the Control_R key.]

Other responses were that I could use epoch to solve this problem.  I have
no idea what epoch is, so I don't know what it does.  Another person said
it worked fine on his system which was configured the same as mine, maybe
someone already patched his emacs.

Thanks to all that replied:
   "Hamish (H.I.) Macdonald" <hamish@x400gate.bnr.ca>
   Andy Harp <aharp@hermes.mod.uk>
   Craig Fisher <fisher@sifvx6.sinet.slb.com>
   Chris Siebenmann <cks@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu>


Matthew.
---------------
internet: braun@falcon.aa.cad.slb.com
From: x91clifton1@gw.wmich.edu
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Which rcs-mode is the best?
Date: 12 Aug 92 16:47:47 EST
Organization: Western Michigan University

There are no less than three versions of `rcs-mode' floating around.
Before I spend hours installing, testing, deleting (recurse), could
some kind soul give my a recommendation on which one seems the most
intelligently written?

Thanks,

/Doug
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: rg@msel.unh.edu (Roger Gonzalez)
Subject: Re: Question: How to use Emacs to access root-owned files
Organization: UNH Marine Systems Engineering Lab
	<BOB.92Aug12120143@volitans.MorningStar.Com>
Distribution: comp
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 01:17:02 GMT

>>>>> "Bob" == Bob Sutterfield <bob@MorningStar.Com> writes:
Bob> Nntp-Posting-Host: volitans.morningstar.com

Bob> In article <BETSYS.92Aug10171110@ra.cs.umb.edu> betsys@cs.umb.edu (Elizabeth Schwartz) writes:

Elizabeth> I need a bit of code that prompts me for the root passwd and then
Elizabeth> lets me read and write as root. (obviously, it mustn't know the
Elizabeth> passwd!)

Bob> Get .. [ange-ftp]

Bob> I say ^X^F/user@hostname:/path/to/file, and ange-ftp prompts me for
Bob> that user's password on that host.  If "user" is "root", you'll be
Bob> editing a file as root on that host.  If "hostname" is "localhost",
Bob> you'll have an Emacs buffer that's root on the same machine as the
Bob> Emacs is running on.  When you ^X^S (or whatever), ange-ftp does
Bob> whatever's necessary to write the file back appropriately via FTP.

KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE!
KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE!
KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE!
KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE! KLUDGE!

Its much less kludgey if you just add a built-in command to Emacs called
"su-command", that prompts for a password, and does a setuid.  Of course, this
requires that you make Emacs suid root, which is probably a Bad Thing.

-Roger
--
"The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting
 than the question of whether a submarine can swim" - Edsger W. Dijkstra 

Roger Gonzalez   -  rg@msel.unh.edu
Division of Bit Banging and Reluctant Robotics
UNH Marine Systems Engineering Laboratory, Durham, NH  03824-3525
(603) 862-4600 -4399 (fax)
From: jbw@bigbird.bu.edu (Joe Wells)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: quit
Date: 16 Aug 92 22:56:14 GMT
Organization: Boston University Computer Science Department
In-reply-to: god@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu's message of 11 Aug 92 16:41:53 GMT

In article <1992Aug11.114154.42263@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> god@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:

   I got a copy of demacs, but I have since learned that there are several
   versions.  Which are crippleware or have silly nag screens?

All of the versions of GNU Emacs, including Demacs, are available for
free.  None are shareware or expect you to send money.

-- 
Joe Wells <jbw@cs.bu.edu>
Member of the League for Programming Freedom --- send e-mail for details
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: scotty@piranha.cs.uoguelph.ca (Steve Howie)
Subject: Re: Building Emacs on a NeXT
Organization: Columbia University Center for Telecommunications Research
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 13:04:57 GMT
X-Posted-From: piranha.cs.uoguelph.ca
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <HARDY.92Aug12175927@golem.ps.uci.edu> hardy@golem.ps.uci.edu  
(Meinhard E. Mayer (Hardy)) writes:
> The NeXT comes with a built-in emacs, not quite v. 18.58.
> The sources are available on the NeXT archives. I also assume 
> that a new improved emacs will come with NeXTStep 3.0, so why not wait
> a few weeks?

You're right - it does, but it looks like it's only on the 'big' NeXTs with  
the development environment. I just have a minimal slab and it ain't there. I  
did some scouring on our file server cube and voila - there it was. NFS mount  
time :)

Scotty

> --
> Hardy 
> -----
> Meinhard E. Mayer,  Department of Physics, UC Irvine 
> e-mail: hardy@golem.ps.uci.edu (preferred) or MMAYER@UCI.BITNET
From: 754clifton@gw.wmich.edu
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: tar/zip mode?
Date: 19 Aug 92 16:20:47 EST
Organization: Western Michigan University

In article <1992Aug19.004058.18149@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>, dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu (David M. Jones) writes:
> Greetings.
> 
> Has anyone written a GNU emacs interface to either the zip or the tar
> archive utilities?  I've been thinking of trying to write something
> that is a cross between dired mode and crypt.el to make it easier to
> manipulate archives without manually unpacking them.  I've already
> checked the Elisp directory, but didn't find anything obviously
> relevant.  Any leads would be appreciated.
> 
> David M. Jones                              "Trifles! Trifles light as air!"
> dmjones@theory.lcs.mit.edu                              -- the Hystricide
>

There are two packages available that I know of:

	archive.el (archive-mode) works with zoo, zip, lzh, arc, and tar files.
	tar-mode.el (tar-mode) works with tar files.

I hacked archive to work with only zoo, zip and lzh files and left tar files
to tar mode. BTW, w/ auto-uncompress you can visit tar.Z files and get a nice
dired listing of all the files in the tape-archive.

/Doug
--
Douglas Clifton [99clifto@lab.cc.wmich.edu]
From: mickeyf@vnet.ibm.com (Mickey Ferguson)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 10:02:48 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: Using meta key on Sun Sparc
Organization: Rolm
Disclaimer: This note represents my views, not those of Rolm or IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0

OK, I've given up trying to get my emacs working properly, and had a much
better idea.  Here goes...  Can anyone tell me a machine and pathnames of
where I can get the latest version of emacs which already contains the
built versions of emacs and emacstool for running on a Sun Sparc IPX and
SunOS 4.1.2?  If it's accessible via anonymous ftp, I can get it.  Please
send email to me telling me where to find this.  Thanks very much in
advance.

Mickey Ferguson -- Rolm -- FergusoM at scrvm2 -- mickeyf@vnet.ibm.com