HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bsmith@serverx.osf.org (Bruce Smith)
Subject: Re: Moron
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 20:45:36 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.174444.24158@ntmtv> bradletm@ntmtv.UUCP (Tim Bradley) writes:
>From article <1992Sep10.141112.16922@osf.org>, by bsmith@serverx.osf.org (Bruce Smith):
>> In article <1992Sep9.014238.11411@math.ucla.edu> rfedkiw@redwood.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:
>>>In Article 28194, Tony Bechtold rambles
>>>> ... blah blah blah...
>>>> All the rest can't cut it against the strong NFC defenses.  The
>>>> mighty Bills have proven this the last two years.
>>>                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>Funny how two years ago the Giants LOST to the Bills in the regular
>>>season. Even funnier is how the Giants played at home.
>>>If you weren't such a moron you would've known that the Bills 
>>
>> (A bunch of stuff deleted...)
>> 
>> 
>> Bruce Smith
>
>Hey!  If anyone should know about the Bills, it is Bruce Smith.  By the
>way, Bruce, thanks for the stomping you gave my Rams :^(.  How's the
>knee?
>
Well, both knees are just fine, thanks. My hands are doing okay, too, and thus
I am able to offer such insights, arguments, flames, and humor to enlighten,
persuade, provoke, and amuse subscribers to r.s.f.p. What more could one ask
of life?

As for the *other* Bruce Smith, I offer my thanks to him for helping me to get
off to a decent start in a non-net football pool. I also wish him, and the
other Bills well in their forthcoming journey to the City on a Hill. 

Could the Rams really be as bad as they looked last week? Perhaps we will
see Sunday, when they face our young New England Patriots. Although the
Patriots lack anyone of Smith's stature (especially with DE Garin Veris *still*
holding out), they may prove a match for the favored Rams.


Bruce Smith


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bradletm@ntmtv.UUCP (Tim Bradley)
Subject: Re: 49er's Seifert - DUMP COFER
Originator: bradletm@rastaban
Organization: Northern Telecom Incorporated
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 23:16:55 GMT

From article <009609CD.ACA2E260@vms.csd.mu.edu>, by 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu:
> In article <1992Sep14.160012.4537@sequent.com>, newson@sequent.com (Newson) writes:
>>In article <holly.210@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com> holly@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com (Holly Wise) writes:
>>>
>>>I've been saying this for 3 years.  Dump Cofer.  We won't get to Superbowl 
>>>with him there.  Think Seifert's on the net?
>>>-----
>>>holly@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com
>>
>>He doesn't need to be on the net to get this message, if he didn't get it 
>>yesterday, he won't get it. Daluiso is available isn't he?

Nope - he is on the Broncos as the kickoff man and long FGs.

> 
> Is Raul Allegre still with the Jets?
> If I remember right he was cut by them.
> He is a good pressure kicker.
> 

He is still available, as far as I know.


						- Tim
From: tsv@dbrus.Unify.Com (Tim Vannaman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Who has got the toughest schedule - a repost.
Date: 11 Sep 92 15:56:13 GMT
Organization: /usr/lib/news/organization

In article <00960680.781019A0@vms.csd.mu.edu> 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu writes:
>
>Here is a statistical help at figuring out which team has
>'suffered' the most from the draw.
>
>Based on the 1991 results of NON DIVISIONAL OPPONENTS
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>Team		in '91		Opp.rec		%
>
>1.Denver	12-4		81-47		0.633
>2.Washington	14-2		79-49		0.617
>3.Kansas city	10-6		75-53		0.586
>4.Dallas	10-6		74-54		0.578
>5.Buffalo	13-3		73-55		0.570
>  Detroit	11-5		73-55		0.570
>  Raiders	9-7		73-55		0.570
>8.New Orleans	10-6		89-71		0.556
>9.Philadelphia	10-6		71-57		0.555
>10.Chicago	11-5		67-61		0.523
>   Miami	8-8		67-61		0.523
>   Seattle	7-9		67-61		0.523
>13.Houston	11-5		83-77		0.519
>14.Giants	8-8		66-62		0.516
>   Jets		8-8		66-62		0.516   !!!
>16.Atlanta	10-6		82-78		0.513
>17.San Fran'co	10-6		80-80		0.500
>   Minnesota    8-8		64-64		0.500
>19.Pittsburgh	7-9		78-82		0.488
>20.Cleveland	6-10		75-85		0.469
>   New England	6-10		60-68		0.469
>22.Rams		3-13		73-87		0.456
>23.Green Bay	4-12		58-70		0.453
>24.Cincinnati	3-13		70-90		0.438
>25.Tampa Bay	3-13		47-81		0.367
>26.Phoneix	4-12		45-83		0.352
>27.Indianapolis 1-15		42-86		0.328
>28.San Diego	4-12		36-92		0.281
>
>

How does your list look w/ the divisional schedules included?  You can't base
a schedule strength on outer-divisional games only.

It looks like the criteria was selected so Denver could have the toughest 
schedule.  How 'bout we break it down to games out of the division but in the
same conference? Where does it end?


Teams playing 2 games in the division is a given, so schedule making is really
only picking x number of teams out of the division to play -based on how they
finished the year before.  In that regard, Denver may have the toughest 
"schedule".  The REAL schedule (all games played, not just outer-divisional) 
strength will be different. 

ex.  Suppose the Cards draw a schedule that is ranked 26th, but because they
have 8 games w/ Dal,Was,Phi & NY, that may leapfrog them to 10th.

Oh well, who cares?

Tim.
--
Tim Vannaman, Premium Technical Support Engineer   Phone: (916) 928-6433
Unify Corporation, Sacramento, California    Fax: (916) 928-6403
tsv@unify.Com  or  {{ucdavis,csun,lll-crg}!csusac,pyramid,sequent}!unify!tsv
From: ucap22a@ucl.ac.uk (Mr Alisdair R Davey)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 49ers topple Giants 31-14
Keywords: revenge
Date: 13 Sep 92 15:04:13 GMT
Organization: Bloomsbury Computing Consortium, London

After seeing very brief highlights of 49'ers/Giants, I was under the impression
they were using Rathman as a wide reciever.. :-) What's the current punting 
situation btw. ?
Alisdair
From: ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Two Great Plays (was Re: Cowboys 23, Redskins 10)
Date: 11 Sep 92 20:33:35 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1992Sep10.002615.23825@afit.af.mil> tbreeden@afit.af.mil (Thomas A. Breeden) writes:
>In article <18l3i1INN8kf@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> jjs11@po.CWRU.Edu (Joseph J. Shen) writes:
>>
>>I was nervously sweating out the MNF game lying on my beanbag on my living
>>I don't remember Emmitt Smith being that much of a cut-back type
>>runner as he showed Monday night (ala Barry Sanders);  am I wrong in
>>thinking that he's mostly a juker?
>>
>>GO COWBOYS!!!!!
>>-- 
>>                                           
>>				           Joe
>>				     jjs11@po.cwru.edu
>
>I've always considered Emmitt a hole-popper.  There are one or
>two highlights you see over and over that show Emmitt "juking,"
>but more often people just mystically glance off of him -- like
>the touchdown run Monday night.  He's mister balance and mister
>vision.  In my house we thank God for Emmitt before every meal.

You have hit the nail on the head. Emmitt is a smaller, more compact version 
of Walter Payton. He pack 210 pounds on a 5'8" frame. He will never be any 
faster than 4.6 in the 40 but he has tremendous balance and vision. He's 
beautiful for an ex-running like me to watch becaue he is so fluid and so 
instinctive.. People glance off him simply because he is ungodly strong for his
size especially in the lower body. 


>
>I only wish Steve Spurrier and Emmitt could have hit Florida
>at the same time.

They were there together for one year.. Emmitt took one look at that all-out 
passing attack Steve wanted to implement and headed for the pros..


-- 
Ronnie
-------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not cynical... I just don't believe in anything....
From: SFRELIAS@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Buffalo Bills are underdogs
Date: 11 Sep 92 12:45:19 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo


 
Your have to be kidding me. The Bills are much better football team then the
Niners. Anyway we shall see what happen sunday.
 
I can't wait until we play Maimi and beat them again. It is always nice to
squish that fish. We have enjoyed doing it for the last oh 5,6 years.
 
Go bills and show the niners how football is realy played.
 
Bills 31
Niners 10
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 49er's Seifert - DUMP COFER
Date: 14 Sep 1992 20:50:14 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

In article <1992Sep14.160012.4537@sequent.com>, newson@sequent.com (Newson) writes:
>In article <holly.210@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com> holly@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com (Holly Wise) writes:
>>
>>I've been saying this for 3 years.  Dump Cofer.  We won't get to Superbowl 
>>with him there.  Think Seifert's on the net?
>>-----
>>holly@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com
>
>He doesn't need to be on the net to get this message, if he didn't get it 
>yesterday, he won't get it. Daluiso is available isn't he?

Is Raul Allegre still with the Jets?
If I remember right he was cut by them.
He is a good pressure kicker.

************************************************************
N.Ramasubramanian    GO BREWERS - BULLS -93  - HAIL 'SKINS

Politicians' statements tend to have a low specific gravity.
They carry less weight  than their volume would suggest.
		- Jonathan Miller
************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: No more good QBs,RBs
Keywords: Running Backs, Quarterbacks
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 18:34:11 GMT

In article <tokuno.716233859@milton> tokuno@milton.u.washington.edu (Ken Tokuno) writes:
>
>	Ever notice that all of the really great quarterbacks are well
>over 30?  Marino, Young, Moon, Kelly, Elway, etc. are all in that
>category.  When these QBs were younger, it seemed that every team had one
>good or great QB to lead them.  This was back in the mid-80s.  There were
>also QBs like Fouts, Theismann, Stabler, Kramer, Grogan, Plunkett, and of
>course Joe Montana around.  Of the young (under 30) QBs today, how many
>are truly great?  None, IMHO.  Only a few even have the potential: 
>Rypien, George, Miller, Rosenbach, Aikman.  Where did all the talent go?
>
>	The same can be said for running backs.  In the mid-80s there were
>RBS like Payton, Sims, Dorsett, Tyler, Warner, Dickerson, Allen, etc. 
>Every team had one and sometimes two excellent runners.  Now there are
>only a handful of them:  Smith, Thomas, Sanders.  Some of the older ones
>are still around but are a shadow of their former selves:  Dickerson,
>Allen, O.J. Anderson and Roger Craig, for example.  Then there are some
>respectable ones, like Byner, Word, Neal Anderson and a few others.  Look
>at a list of the all time leading rushers.  It is full of those players
>who began their careers in the late 70s to early 80s.  They have 5000,
>6000, up to 16,000 yards rushing.  Of the current crop, I can see only the
>three named above as getting over 7000 yards for their careers.  Where did
>all the talent go?

They are blowing in the wind.  My grandson is now 4 years old and I
guess we will have to wait 'till he develops and gets older before
we have another super star. ":-) 
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "I have great faith in fools - self-confidence my
   friends call it."        Edgar Allan Poe
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Giants QB controversy (again)
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 20:09:45 GMT

In article <1180@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu> larry@aecom.yu.edu (Larry Simmons) writes:
>In article <EefrI1K00Uh783GoJf@andrew.cmu.edu> (Thomas Oligino) writes:
>>
>>    The only hope for this team is for Simms and Hampton to have big
>>games Sunday. 
>
>I wouldn't be surprised if Hoss plays. In fact, I would even guess that Handley
>did this on purpose to let the Boys design a game plan against an immobile QB.
>
>If Simms plays well, then Handley looks good. If Simms plays poorly, and Hoss
>comes in to play well, Handley also looks good. If neither QB plays well,
>Handley is off the hook.
>
Well, after todays game, what is the verdict.  We didn't get to see
the game here in the East Bay (Calif.), but the score updates 
regarding the Cowboys and Giants looked pretty much like a blowout
in favor of the Cowboys.....Hey Wait A Minute...the score is 34/28,
less than two minutes (sports update) and the Cowboys are still 
leading!!!!   AHHHHH, the lousy Cowboys WON!

>> ... Im starting to think that the Giants can win Sunday ! It's a
>>incurable affliction that strikes me every week about this time no
>>matter how bad the prospects.
>
It looked like Simms went all the way, so is Handley going to get
lynched because they lost?  Like I said, I didn't see the game, but
it appeared that Simm made a run but came up short.

>I definitely think the Giants can win. Especially since they are home.
>Remember, any time two division teams get together you can throw their record
>out the window - it's usually a close game.
>
>>Go Simms, Go Giants. 
>
It is going to be a looonnnng season for the Giants.  I guess next
week The HOSS is in.

-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "I have great faith in fools - self-confidence my
   friends call it."        Edgar Allan Poe
From: jeffyg@chester.ksu.ksu.edu (Jeffrey Wayne Geist)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Chiefs and Cowboys!!!!!
Date: 9 Sep 1992 16:19:14 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: chester.ksu.ksu.edu

Here we have the two greatest teams in the league this year.  Im not sure which
week it is, but KC plays in Dallas.  A preview of the Super Bowl??  Very likely
this will be the case.  Thanks to the Minnesota Vikings, the Cowboys have 
on miniscule question marks.  The Chiefs only have Krieg as a question mark.
It appears that he can hold his own as a Chiefs QB.  By the way....  the
Skins didnt make themselves look bad Monday nite.  Dallas is just simply better
and the Skins are overrated.  It will be interesting when the Skins come into
Arrowhead.  Will they then have the right to be called Skins after being 
skinned?  Yup!  I feel sorry for all the fans of the D.C. dudes, but thats the
way it goes.

A side lite:  I also feel sorry for all the fans of the following teams:
              Broncos
              Raiders
              Bills


Go Chiefs!  Go Cowboys!
-- 
Alright, you asked for it!  This is the Jeff Geist .sig file.  
Isnt it a bute?

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: wlittle@nmsu.edu (Wes)
Subject: Re: The Niners are the favorites.
Organization: NMSU Computer Science
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 22:39:18 GMT

Maybe I will believe that when the Niners beat someone of playoff
caliber!

GO COWBOYS!!!
Super Bowl '93!
Wes
From: rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dallas/Skins Wrapup + *icednotes*
Date: 10 Sep 92 21:38:49 GMT
Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino CA, USA

In article <18oarsINNn08@news.aero.org> mas@aero.org (Marcus A.Shaw) writes:
>* Penalties were still fairly low, a JJ trademark,


Yes, his teams at Miami were notorious for their low penalty totals.   
I assume you are only referring to his time as the Cowboys coach?




Russ Smith
*******************************************************************************
"I'm pacing myself sir"
                          Bill Murray in Stripes
********************************************************************************





Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes)
Subject: Re: QB ratings, week 2 & cumulative
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 19:03:24 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.181612.16596@lgc.com>, bernie@lgc.com (Bernie De La Torre) writes:
> In article <1992Sep15.144849.19419@ncar.ucar.edu> gary@colossus.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand) writes:
>>Week 2 (minimum 10 attempts):
>>Pos Name              Atts Comp   Cmp%  Yards  AvgGn TDs  TD % INT  IN%   RATE
>>--- ----------------  ---- ----   ----  -----  ----- ---  ---- ---  ---   ----
>>1 R. Cunningham       22   17   77.3    267  12.14   3  13.6   0  0.0   156.6
>>2 V. Testaverde       25   22   88.0    363  14.52   2   8.0   0  0.0   145.4
> 
> This just shows how flawed the formula for computing the quarterback rating
> is. Testaverde had a nearly perfect game and still ranks below Cunningham
> who through for less yards, had a lower completion % and avg gain per throw.
> IMHO, too much weigth is given to touchdown passes.

I admit Testaverde had a nearly perfect game looking at the numbers, but
so did Randall.  Using one game, the formula may be flawed, but over an
entire season it all evens out.  Besides, you can have all the yardage
and the high ratings you want, but give me six anytime!


Joe Dakes
AT&T Microelectronics
555 Union Boulevard
Allentown, PA  18103
alux2!jmd

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Scottl@mot.com (Scott Lindsey)
Subject: Re: Bears
Organization: Motorola Land Mobile Products Sector
Distribution: us
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 19:47:40 GMT

Neal Anderson is practically equivalent to Herschel Walker
They're both very fast and when they turn the corner, they're gone
They're both strong (Walker more so, but Anderson is stronger than average)
They both make 20 times as much as a Ph.D. educated engineer or scientist
They both enjoy running up the butt of their own linemen with their heads
      down
Both appear to have the peripheral vision and  presense of a rat 
      looking through 2 inch diameter lead pipe...

They need to practice turning they're heads

In article <ddrumm.07qx@amiganet.chi.il.us>, ddrumm@amiganet.chi.il.us (Daniel Drumm) writes:
> 
> In article <1992Sep8.192544.9823@advtech.uswest.com>, steven@jaynes ( Steve
> Novak) writes:
> >> = (Burt Juarez) writes:
> >
> >>I think Neal Anderson sucks.  They should play Darren Lewis more.  He's much
> >>more talented than Anderson.  He has better field and vision and is a much
> >>better runner.  I think they should dump Anderson.  
> >
> >Sure thing, Meester Expert.  Dump the guy that scored two TDs - one
> >rushing, one a pass reception, and both that patented Anderson
> >up-the-sidelines-from the-ten-and-dive-bomb-just-past-the-flag.  
> >
> >Keep your day job, Burt.
> >
> >I _do_ agree that Darren Lewis (and Green) should play a bit more then
> >they did on opening day; start turning Anderson into a combo
> >receiver/blocker/runner.
> >
> >
> >-- 
> >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >| Steve Novak |    |"Wacker the K"| 
> >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >steven@advtech.USWest.Com
>  
>  
> The best and most reasonable suggestion is to move Neal Anderson to the FB
> position in a rotating scheme to rest Muster, who has a bad back. Neal used to
> be the FB with Sweetness, and he does block better than Lewis, who really OUGHT
> to be the starting tailback. Here's how I'd run it:
>  
> Start: Muster and Lewis
> Then: Anderson and Lewis
> Then: Anderson and Green
> Then: Muster and Green
>  
> I'd also move Dent to the 3rd down specialist he wants to be, and not put
> Armstrong inside on 3rd down passing situations. That's how he busted his knee
> up, and he HATES being a tackle. Go with this setup, given the Fridge is the
> lean 318 machine he looks to be:
>  
> Start:  Armstrong  McMichael  Fridge  Spellman
>  
> 3rd down pass:  Roper  Ryan  Spellman  Dent
>  
>  
> That's the most effective set. IMHO.
>  
> ---------------------------------///
> Daniel Drumm                    ///
> ddrumm@amiganet.chi.il.us   \\\///
> -----------------------------\XX/
> 
> 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Subject: Re: Billups (was Re: Tootie Robbins)
Originator: pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 01:02:12 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.002943.13078@cis.ohio-state.edu> martens@python.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens) writes:
>
>UPI reported today that Lewis Billups is among the 20 current or
>former Bungals named in the rape case in Seattle.  Suddenly there's a
>reason to not ignore this story.
>-- 
>
>-- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)


To make this report complete, it was reported that Billups was one of the
players who is charged with the rape of the woman. There are others who are
charged with only watching and not doing anything.

The reporter here in Milwaukee said that the case will not come to trial 
until sometime in 1993.

Billups always has had the label of trouble maker. I hope that he really
didn't have anything to do with this.


Patrick Pape
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 19:08:43 -0400 
From: Christopher Glenn Huegle <ch44+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: STEELERS

Well, it's time to find out if the Steelers are actually able to live up
to their first week accomplishments.....
On paper, the Jets are a few levels lower than the Oilers, but I can't
imagine the Steelers intercepting Nagle 5 times....maybe 2 or 3 :)
of course, I can't imagine O'Donnel fumbling away a touchdown or someone
making a great catch that the human refs will call a touchdown.....It
should be a great game, out come and all, if O'Donnell doesn't fall
apart....wish Green was playing....Imagine it's probably a little tough
on Graham knowing that in his second start he will probably be the #1
reciever.  Stone, the only reciever with much experience is only really
a long threat and you don't win games with only that.....Foster is going
to have a full game.  He should get around 30 carries
again.....Hopefully, Hoge will contribute this time..and so maybe will
the defensive line...of course they were responsible for at least one of
the interceptions against Moon by tipping the ball..but, they need to
pressure the young Nagle...If he's pressured, his youth may come out and
he could have a bad day....if he has all day, his talent will come out
and the Steelers' fans could have a long day, even though the Steelers
may still win as was demonstrated last game...I wonder what the spread
would have been if the Oilers would have won the game by 5 or 6?  About
15 points? Who knows?.......Oh well, that's my pre-game thoughts...can't
wait to post my post game thoughts.....
            Chris

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com (Bob Ashley)
Subject: Early Games ... PARTIAL SCORES
Reply-To: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com
Organization: GTE Federal Systems Division
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 17:23:31 GMT

Sunday, 13 September - EARLY GAMES
 
        Dallas          14                      Minnesota        0
    1   NY Giants        0                  1   Detroit          7

No score in Atlanta-Washington game ... Lohmiller misses a 29 yard field goal.
Also, no scores in other early games ...
 

Bob - it's gonna be a long season ...

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Ashley                        Internet:  Bob.Ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com

Software Engineer, (703)-818-4656  | Winter Leagues 1992-1993
   GTE Federal Systems Division    |    GTE FSD Mixed Secretary: Thu 17:45
   15000 Conference Center Drive   |    Thursday Mixups:         Thu 20:30
   Chantilly, VA   22021-3808      |    NFL Mixed Secretary:     Mon 21:00
From: chico@athena.mit.edu (Thomas A Weston)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Games on TV
Date: 13 Sep 92 14:49:05 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Does anybody know what games are going to be shown in Boston?  I can't seem to
find any information on it.  I'm particularly interested in whether or not the
Niners/Bills game is on here.

Thanks in advance.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro