HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rhialto@cs.kun.nl (Olaf Seibert)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re:  Bi Quotes
Date: 9 Apr 92 10:47:37 GMT
Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

In article <1992Apr9.012037.9025@midway.uchicago.edu> pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>the great red-head hunt is on!!!!
>olaf's keeping the list, with names and (hopefully) e-mail 
>addresses!  (if have red hair and wantto be hunted, let him 
>know (-:)  ...
>
>"and they're off!"
>peg

And I just decided to keep a list of redhead-hunters too, and we both
are already on it! I should have remembered to write down the redheads
from previous posts... I could grep through old posts at home (the
famous falu.sneakernet machine ;-) and make some notes!
-- 
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert      B4f+-t-w--g+k+(+)svmrp+  rhialto@cs.kun.nl
\X/ How can you be so stupid if you're identical to me? -Robert Silverberg
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary)
Subject: Re: red hair again?
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 17:31:19 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA - aka Barnum & Bailey

pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu wrote...
>i can vouch for heather, folx.  we want her atthe seattle orgy, too...
>;)
No problem - how many does that make now?

>btw- ellen, who wants in on the red-head hunt did neglect to mention
>that she herself is a *strawberry*blonde*!!!  yes, ellen, your secret
>is out!  
>heh heh heh
>peg

We really have to figure out this name confusion, before I start
doubting my own hair color.

Ellen (The brown-haired one - I checked.  Who's in Calif. not Chicago)
(Who favors brown/black hair, but isn't _that_ picky. :-) )

--
 Patricia "Ellen" Clary              | "Caution: Ice pick weilding bisexual
 pclary@polyslo.csc.CalPoly.EDU      |  fag dyke.  Do not agitate."
 pclary@nike.CalPoly.EDU             |         A 'Catherine Did It' T-Shirt
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: monitn@aix02.ecs.rpi.edu (Nicholas Monitto)
Subject: Look, another de-muffining...
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 07:20:39 GMT

  Thanks for the answers to the questions. I guess this means that I am 
de-muffining (somewhat officially) here at about 3:16am- why am I still
awake???
  I've been reading this group for a while, and have found it both
 entertaining and informative. There's a lot to be learned from what's 
posted here, but it's fun to read all the e-flirts, too. :)
  Umm, I'm not really sure what else to say here. I'm at college in Troy,
NY (beautiful upstate area). I can't really say just how actively bi I am-
it's kind of like I'm in the middle of finding myself. Of course any offers 
to help with this will certainly be considered... :)
  Off to sleep now. Until later...

  Nick, the Self-Radiating TeddyBear (tm)  (monitn@rpi.edu)
   
Xref: sparky soc.bi:4219 soc.motss:19504
From: dill@world.std.com (David Kaufman)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Dominos (was: De-muffining, me too!)
Date: 15 Apr 92 04:46:42 GMT
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA

Max Handelsman asks:

>So, any ideas for a NE...um, gathering?

Portland comes to mind ... Maine!


-- dave
____
\  / dill@world.std.com
 \/ dkaufman@crd.lotus.com

  
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?))
Subject: Re: bisexuality a fad? (was Re: Bisexuality and Furries...)
Reply-To: pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 18:21:30 GMT

In article <1992Apr09.171647.23055@vpnet.chi.il.us> orc@vpnet.chi.il.us (david parsons) writes:
>   Long hair is a killer, though, on a good-looking man, when he's
>also wearing jeans and a jacket. It helps if he's a redhead, too (lapse
>into drooling...)

methinks david just joined the great red-head hunt!  ;)

<evil grin>
peg

Newsgroups: soc.bi,soc.motss
From: frankm@microsoft.com (Frank R.A.J. Maloney)
Subject: Re: Laws in the Isle of Man
Date: 11 Apr 92 03:31:48 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Windows/DOS Users Ed Group

In article <1992Apr2.224505.13473@PacBell.COM> rjwill6@PacBell.COM (Rod Williams) writes:
>> buckmr@marcus.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire) writes:
>>> cjmchale@cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:
>>
>>>The Manx parliamant voted narrowly after a heated all-day debate to fall
>>>in line with demands from Europe to allow sex in private between
>>>consenting adult males.
>>
>>Wow! Now THIS is cool news. Has anyone else heard about this?
>
>Gee, Ron -- I'm happy for the gay men of Man an' all, but
>let's have a little perspective, por favor...the place is
>three miles wide and twelve miles long, with a population
>of about 10,000 (?) people and perhaps a few more sheep.
>I don't think this change is going to start any trends or
>anything...

Ah, but the Manx Laoghtym rams have four horns, two down-curving.

And the island actually measures 33 miles in length, and 12 miles in
breadth at the widest point, for 221 square miles in area. (And then
there's the Calf of Man, a really small island off the southern tip of
Man that's a wildlife preserve, I believe.)

Now, I don't have to cancel my standing order at the Manx philatelic
service.

And I don't have to fee guilty for petting Manx cats.

So, Ciaran, when's the Dail going to follow suit, now that the House of
Keys has done the right thing? And, btw, do you know if Tynwald is
anything more than a rubber stamp, i.e., would there be any difficulty
in confirming the change? (Tynwald, for the few of you not into things
Manx, is an open-air parliament that meets on July 5 each year to
confirm the acts of the Keys through the preceding year -- if I
understand it and I may not.)

-- 
Frank Richard Aloysius Jude Maloney
	"Only the mediocre can always be at their best." -- Mencken
For an average time write uunet!microsoft!frankm
For an even more mediocre time try frankm@microsoft.com
From: rhialto@cs.kun.nl (Olaf Seibert)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Delayed articles...
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:28:11 GMT
Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

The "previous" articles should not really have the dates they have; they
were delayed for several days due to a posting problem. Or perhaps you
already read that...
-- 
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert      B4f+-t-w--g+k+(+)svmrp+  rhialto@cs.kun.nl
\X/ How can you be so stupid if you're identical to me? -Robert Silverberg
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: pentangl@spdcc.com (Scott Moir)
Subject: Re:  Bi Quotes
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 15:07:58 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.012037.9025@midway.uchicago.edu> pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <rhialto.0022@falu.sneakernet> rhialto@cs.kun.nl writes:
>>In article <1992Mar30.040827.5166@vax.oxford.ac.uk> cen@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
>>>Is my reputation as insatiable lustmonster hunting redheads dampened yet?
>>
>>Nope! I guess we'll have to create a list of redheads, purely for my
>>benefit... *awaits angry response* ok, ok, you may use it too...
>
>the great red-head hunt is on!!!!
>olaf's keeping the list, with names and (hopefully) e-mail 
>addresses!  (if have red hair and wantto be hunted, let him 
>know (-:)  ...
>
>"and they're off!"
>peg

Hmm.. I have brown hair, but my -beard- is red. Does that count? :)

Scott

-- 
Scott Moir / Pentangle / Satyr ______ # "There's really only one requirement 
pentangl@Ursa-Major.spdcc.com  \ \/ / #  for a Prophet, and you've got it."
B4 f t+ w g k+(+) s+ m r p+     \/\/  # "What's that?"
These are my opinions, not SPDCC's    # "A mouth." - 'God' to J.R.'BoB' Dobbs
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Sara's ElectroPostie)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: The best possible taste (was Re: Bi Quotes and Red Heads)
Date: 13 Apr 92 05:48:57 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?)) writes:

>anyone going to admit to bein a good tasting queer?  ;)
><leer>

Sure - but can you believe me?  Maybe you'd better find out for yourself
... <even lewder leer>

       >{8-)

Sara
-- 
 >{8-)  Sara Hopkins  (-8}<                      ______             ^
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St.   \  / / Glorious OOO
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662   \/\/   Stereo  ++  
 >  sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk  < < Six of one, half a dozen of the other >
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 14:57:27 EDT
From: ebt-inc!pks@uunet.UU.NET (Pearl Stark)
Message-Id: <9204071857.AA02706@ebt-inc>
Subject: Re: Bi's Attacked ?? What to you think??
-> At this point I agree with the poster. While it is nice to make contact
    -> with other people who are into your particular 'thing' (I'm deliberately
    -> leaving that ambiguous), it also serves to make it so that you never see
    -> anyone else but those particular kind of people. You don't get to know
    -> anything about crossdressers (for example) by looking at them in another
    -> room, you need to have them up close. Differences should be thought of
    -> as what makes special, not as a reason to compartmentalize. Shared
    -> diversity makes all of us better.
	...
    -> Scott

I agree that there is a need for a unified front sometimes, that we can much more
effectively change the system when we work together, but I also understand the need
for individual support groups.  There are times when being with people 
who share exactly (or very close to) the same problems/needs/desires/traumas etc
as you do, is ten times more beneficial than even being with generally supportive
but diverse friends.  As long as we know when to work together for common goals
I see nothing wrong with also leaving space for individual sexual minorities.
pearl
From: chris@unicorn.resun.com (Chris Von Hendy)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Looking for fun sex games to play.
Date: 16 Apr 92 23:40:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: unicorn.01010049.16nkk0
Reply-To: chris@unicorn.resun.com
Organization: Metalogic, S.a r.l.
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.5v3


In article <1992Apr13.223047.3953@rat.csc.calpoly.edu>, pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
> You might also consider posting to soc.motss (if you haven't
> already done so), although you might get scary mail from the
> numerous phobes that religiously (pun intended) read that
> group.  Better yet, you might try emailing to some of the
> more outspoken members of either newsgroup.

Better still if you can, get to alt.sex.motss.  Even if you don't want
to post the question there just reading some of the stories others have
posted might give you some good ideas. 
> 
> Also, you mentioned that neither of you were particularly
> interested in anal sex.  But you don't have to have anal sex
> (meaning: penetration) in order to feel pleasure "down
> there."  There are a whole host of nerves at the base of
> your spine, that just love to have pressure put on them with
> whatever body part your partner chooses (some parts are
> better than others <grin> - thighs are very nice.)

Also remember that what feels good to you may not be something that
your partner wants to get into, but it is a good starting place.  Talk
about what feels good to each other.  Spend some time just caressing
each other.  Do this in different situations. A caress feels different
with lubrication vs. no lubrication.  Warm water, such as in a shower,
can also change how something feels.   

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Von Hendy            "If we shadows have offended,
Escondido, California       Think but this, and all is mended,
ncr-sd!blkhole!chris  or    That you have but slumbered here,
chris@unicorn.resun.com     While these visions did appear." Puck
From: pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?))
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re:  Bi Quotes
Date: 14 Apr 92 17:27:25 GMT
Reply-To: pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <01010066.0v82lq@unicorn.resun.com> chris@unicorn.resun.com writes:
>
>Sorry Peg, you have to come collect them in person.  Big grin.

i get to go to california?  great!  never been there, you 
know.  when should i expect my plane ticket in the mail?  ;)

>By the way, my hair is very long, dark brown with auburn highlights,
>and more silver every time I look.  Can I join in on the hunt?

yes, but it sounds as though you may qualify to be *hunted*.  
<evil grin>
better watch out...

peg
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: dm_johnson@phone.enet.dec.com ()
Subject: Re: Women are BLG, too! (was: Outing at the Oscars?)
Reply-To: dm_johnson@phone.enet.dec.com ()
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 14:29:46 GMT


In article <iw.702668544@tosser>, iw@tosser.Rational.COM (Iseult White) writes:
|> Path: e2big.mko.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!uunet!igor!tosser!iw
|> From: iw@tosser.Rational.COM (Iseult White)
|> Newsgroups: soc.bi
|> Subject: Re: Women are BLG, too! (was: Outing at the Oscars?)
|> Message-ID: <iw.702668544@tosser>
|> Date: 7 Apr 92 17:42:24 GMT
|> References: <1992Mar27.175240.9886@midway.uc <1992Mar29.060323.24056@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> <1992Mar30.181036.16830@fig.citib.com> <1992Apr7.012559.25154@leland.Stanford.EDU>
|> Sender: news@Rational.COM
|> Lines: 14
|> 
|> gere@umunhum.stanford.edu (Susan Gere) writes:
|> 
|> >- Do women who are victims of incest/sexual abuse shift nn points 
|> >  on the Kinsey scale in response?  (my limited knowledge says yes.
|> 
|> My limited knowledge would probably say yes too.  But I have always shied
|> away from it, because it sounds like too easy a way to 
|> explain (for those people who have a need to) why women are sometimes attracted
|> to women instead of men.In article <iw.702668544@tosser>, iw@tosser.Rational.COM (Iseult White) writes:
|> Path: e2big.mko.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!uunet!igor!tosser!iw
|> From: iw@tosser.Rational.COM (Iseult White)
|> Newsgroups: soc.bi
|> Subject: Re: Women are BLG, too! (was: Outing at the Oscars?)
|
|> Has anyone ever seen studies that suggest that a higher percentage of BL women
|> have been sexually abused?
|> 
|> Iseult.
|> 

No, I haven't seen studies. However, I was in a men's group for sexually abused men and the statement was made that 7 of 10 sexually abused men ended up as gay or bisexual. That 70% ratio was valid for the group that I was in and caused some real soul searching among the bis and gays. I would assume a somewhat similar effect on women.

It's interesting to me that the percentage of men who have been sexually abused is close to the percentage of women that are sexually abused but relatively few men or women want to acknowledge that. 

Dj
From: orc@vpnet.chi.il.us (david parsons)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: too perverse? (was Re: I am Muffin! I am INVINCIBLE!)
Date: 16 Apr 92 03:48:34 GMT
Organization: Department of Atomic Text Units

In article <BMI8nv.MHH@world.std.com> dill@world.std.com (David Kaufman) writes:
|>(We need a soc.bi welcome wagon, with a gift package of appropriate
|>flirtation for each new person out of the oven.)
|
|Then I'll post this in breathless anticipation.
|

    Where's that flirt checklist???? ;-)

                __
  david parsons \/ orc@pell.chi.il.us
From: pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: good places to not fit in
Date: 16 Apr 92 03:52:48 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA - aka Barnum & Bailey

sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (S Hopkins) wrote...
>Anyway it's nice to know there are some brown hair hunters out there,
>I'm multi-hairial meself tho, so watch out **all of you**, Sara's
>hunting you ...

Brown hair!  Oh no! (which of course means: oh cool!)
Ellen sneaks up behind Sara, following her every move (Bugs Bunny
style.)  Not only is this the best way to hide from hunters, 
but you can goose them (etc.) when they least expect it! :-)

Ellen

--
 Patricia "Ellen" Clary              | "Caution: Ice pick weilding bisexual
 pclary@polyslo.csc.CalPoly.EDU      |  fag dyke.  Do not agitate."
 pclary@nike.CalPoly.EDU             |         A 'Catherine Did It' T-Shirt
From: pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Looking for fun sex games to play.
Date: 14 Apr 92 22:34:42 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA - aka Barnum & Bailey

cjmchale@cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) wrote...
>In <1992Apr13.223047.3953@rat.csc.calpoly.edu>
>pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
>
>>I'm noticing a certain reticence about this topic (i.e.
>>particular sexual habits between two men).  I do believe I'm
>>seeing, could it be, shyness???
>
>I do believe you are, could it be, generalising ;-)

Moi?  No, I never generalize. ;-)

Ellen

--
 Patricia "Ellen" Clary              |    "There's a lot to be said for
 pclary@polyslo.csc.CalPoly.EDU      |    an experience that's primitive."
 pclary@nike.CalPoly.EDU             |                        Riker (ST:TNG)
From: max@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu (Max Handelsman: liberal hippie subversive dude.)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Bi="fad"? and out on campus.
Date: 13 Apr 92 21:29:45 GMT
Organization: The Loonie Bin


	Oh, and as for Bisexuality being a "fad"...
	I just tell people that many people come out to me as bisexual once 
they see me "out" on campus.  Most people only come out when they see other 
people like them around, and the bi movement hasn't "switched" people, it's 
allowed them to come out in unprecedented numbers. 

	Speaking of coming out, what a week...last Tues.  I did a panel on 
Heterosexism, and wore my "Bisexual Pride" pin, and dropped a lot of "we"'s 
in discussing bisexuality.  Then, just this afternoon, I gave a 
presentation of my paper topic for my senior seminar...45 minutes!  It was 
on "Prjudice and Discrimination Towards and Among Lesbians, Gays, and 
Bisexuals", the "among" referring to bi-phobia and misogyny among gay (and 
bi) men.  I dropped so many "we"'s without even meaning to....but it's a 
cool class, and I'm out to most of the school anyway.
	How have the rest of you handled being out on campus?

	*HUG*s (and whatever else I am permitted),

Max Handelsman, Drew University       | MHANDELS@DREW.{DREW.EDU,BITNET}
"An it harm none, do what thou wilt." | MAX@DRYCAS.{CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU,BITNET}
"Deesclaimer? We don' need no         | MHANDELS@ISIS.CS.DU.EDU
 steenking deesclaimer!"              | This space rented by Squire Phish.
From: ro@panix.com (r l reid)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: sex education, and what it did for me...
Date: 6 Apr 92 21:31:20 GMT
Organization: Playdoh's Republic

In article <1992Mar31.191444.2514@midway.uchicago.edu> pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <1992Mar31.035617.7654@casbah.acns.nwu.edu> jleduc@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (JonPaul Leduc) writes:
>>
>>As I remember sex ed, It was helpful to alot of people.  (Strangely enough
>
><peg reels in shock...>
>WHERE THE HELL DID YOU GO TO SCHOOL!!!!!

Indeed.  The only "sex ed" I got was in high school (I would have been
about 15, long after we had determined what was misssing from Barbie
and Ken (not that that ever stopped us from playing "Barbie, Ken
and Midge go to the doll house without any clothes on" at the 
age of 8)), and it consisted of the gym teacher making us
memorize the names of all the internal parts and then trying
to embarress us by picking the shyest person and pointing to
things like "the penis" and making them identify it out loud.
All in chalk, no pictures.

Of course, this was in the days (which seem to have passed) when
a girl who wanted to take shop and a boy who wanted
to take home ec were told to not be silly and that they were just
trying to get attention.

Lets get sex ed out of the schools (they take the joy out of
EVERYTHING!) and back on the street corner where it belongs!
In fact, lets do the same with math and music and art and
all the good things worth knowing - why let the schools ruin them?

Personal to anyone who hasn't been flirted with lately:
Flutter, flutter.  Tiny grin.  Looking away shyly - back again -
away again.

ro
-- 
WOOF, QUACK AND  MEOW: Composers of Woof present a variety of computer music 
[Apr 4, 9pm ROULETTE (228 West Broadway NYC)]
[Apr 26, 8:30 pm, Cunningham Dance Studio 55 Bethune (Westbeth), NYC)]
[Apr 30, 8:30 pm, SIA, (410 W 118 St, top floor, NYC)]
From: cjmchale@cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Knocking Celibacy
Date: 16 Apr 92 21:13:21 GMT
Organization: DSG, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Trinity College, Dublin.


The story so far...
Ro Reid claimed that he was shy. Sara replied that Ro was about as shy
as she was tee-total or celibate. Her actual phrasing of this was:

	Shy, huh?  Hmmm ... and I'm tee-total ... and celibate ...

Stephanine took offence at this, thinking that Sara was putting down
celibacy, while I read Sara's remark as a variation of the "And pigs can
fly" style of humorously disagreeing with somebody.


In <1992Apr16.190159.26910@ecst.csuchico.edu>
pwiebe@ecst.csuchico.edu (stephanie mandell) writes:

>cjmchale (Ciaran McHale):
>[Think of the line as "Shy, huh? Hmmm ... and pigs can fly"]
>
>And if your average straight 19 year old male said:
> 
>        Shy, huh?  Hmmm ... and I'm gay
>
>Wouldn't we all have a thing or two to say to him?

If you mean, as I think you mean, "wouldn't we all take offence at his
remark?" then no, I wouldn't.

Presuming it was obvious that the man in question was straight then I
think his comment could only be taken as a joke. (If his sexuality
wasn't known then it could be misinterpreted as him coming out.) Over
the past 5 or 6 months that Sara has been posting here, she has made it
obvious that she is most definitely _not_ tee-total. Hence there is
enough context for us to realise that the "And I'm tee-total" part is
definitely intended as humor. The "and celibate" extension can be
reasonably interpreted as an extra piece of humor to punctuate the
previous bit.


<>What strikes me now is that we were still only saying that lesbianism
<>was political; not that heterosexuality was political too.
<>--- "The Tables Need Turning" by Jan Parker, in "Heterosexuality"

Ciaran.
-- 
Ciaran McHale                                                            ----
Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.      \bi/
Telephone: +353-1-7021539  FAX: +353-1-772204  email: cjmchale@cs.tcd.ie  \/
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: mday@jukebox.lcs.mit.edu (Mark Day)
Subject: Re: Stereotypes and bisexuality (wasRe: Coming out to teachers...)
Organization: /u/mday/.organization
	<30960@skye.dcs.ed.ac.uk>
	<1992Apr8.142940.18817@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 16:34:46 GMT

   amy young <alyoung@silver.ucs.indiana.edu> writes:

   I have been called "just another breeder" by bi's as
   well as lesbians.  This shows really how stupid and quick to judge
   these people are, for I may very well be infertile, and besides, he
   and I have decided that with this society, we don't want children.  So
   I didn't marry just to get sperm...  

I don't think that the "breeder" insult is specifically connected to
your plans for children.  So I don't think it makes sense for you
to defend yourself based on the fact that you don't plan to have kids.

Why do I care?  Because it seems like it's just a short step from this
line of defense to the idea that "you can't be bi if you have kids."
And that would be just as wrong as characterizing you as a "breeder"
simply because you married a man.

--Mark Day

mday@lcs.mit.edu
From: gtoal@castle.ed.ac.uk (G Toal)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Looking for fun sex games to play.
Date: 13 Apr 92 01:49:45 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

In article <204801@unix.cis.pitt.edu> was1+@pitt.edu (Scott A Wayne) writes:
>
>	Hello again,
>		My name is Wayne Scott and I am really me.

Yeah, sorry about that.  I chatted with Wayne in mail as to why I thought
it might have been someone abusing his terminals ;-)  Glad I was wrong!

The only suggesion I have to spice up your lovelife at the moment
is "Nutella!".  But then I'm suffering Nutella withdrawal-symptoms
just now :-)

G