From: adamy@milton.u.washington.edu (Erh-Chun Yeh)
Subject: >>>>...Look!.....
Organization: University of Washington
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 12:14:58 GMT


Q: Mr. Park writes:
>adamy@milton.u.washington.edu (Erh-Chun Yeh) writes:

>Message-ID: <adamy.715594365@milton>
>From: adamy@milton.u.washington.edu (Erh-Chun Yeh)
>Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 08:12:45 GMT
>Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
>Organization: University of Washington
>Lines: 121


>   Bummer, I hope you have learned how to use it already. Thanks, but
>   your homework can just get a lower score and I won't hire you anyway.
							  ^^^
Q:      Hey, silly funky guy.. Is this how you do your homework?
Q:      Anyway, if I were you,  at LEAST,  I would check my spells in the
Q:      sentence where the place I point out someone else's spell error.
Q:      Isn't this a funny thing to burst out laughing?

    Hey, are you crazy or what? You are really SO *funny*!!!!! Ha...
    Now, you tell the answer to us - You do *NOT* know how to
    use a spelling checker. Tell you the truth, I don't like laughing.
    But, this time, you got me deadly .....Gees..

>-> I am smile at your ignorance. :-)

> I am laughing  at your .....

Q:      To tell you the truth, since I burst into laughing to see
        
    It sounds like an excellent excuse, doesn't it? Thanks for
    this *sincere* explanation. So, you are pleading not guilty?

Q:      your funky funny behavior,  I just forgot to put  "ing".
Q:      By the way, it is nice to check if you know this type of grammar.

    It is even nice to know that you can recall these stuffs. Anyway,
    who cares about your V + "ing" mess. I really want to beg your
    pardon, why did you _smile_ at my ...?

> Jesus Christ, is this an English sentence? I was or you are
> ignorant? God will bless you for your poorness.

>>According to my observation, you probably also need a grammar checker.
>>Really, now I feel I am a little stupid. I don't even know how a smart

Q:     To see your sentences, don't you really need one ?
  
    I have many! So, what are your suggestions?

Q:     Or were you talking for yourself?  Look at what you did.
Q:     Look at your next beautiful sentences and EXPLAIN!
                   
    Well, they are not really beautiful but better than yours.

>->  No, not a little !  should be a lot.  As you can see here, you need
>->  a lot more study to know yourself better.

>    Yes, I really need more study to figure out what were you talking
						      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>    about here. By the way, do you know what were you trying to say
>    in these sentences?                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Q:     Look at these!  Oh... Aren't these beautiful?  I really want to
Q:     listen how you feel!  Make it sure to let me know!  This is the
    
   You want to _listen_ how I feel? OOOOOOOO ... that is it! Yeah,
   I make *IT* sure to let you know.

Q:     proof of your ignorance.   Look!  Are these right order ? Huh...

   Approved! But, how can I place you? 

Q:     Do you still believe you are eligible to correct grammar for the
Q:     others?  Do you think you are the appropriate person who can fix

   Are you?

Q:     someone else's grammar mistakes?   Let me ask you what you asked

   Sorry, I don't have time to *FIX* your messy article. But I did
   motivate you to look back and perhaps to avoid the same ambiguities
   in the future. Whether I am eligible to correct or fix grammar-related
   errors simply can not be justified by you. Your unveiled amateurism
   is just *not* qualified.

Q:     to me.

	"Jesus Christ, is this an English sentence?  I was or you are
	 ignorant?  God will bless you for your poorness what were you
	 trying to say in these sentences "

   Good! you like these sentences very much. Now you start betraying your
   own self-defined grammar. Don't forget to give me the credit.:-)

Q:     According to my observation, you really don't know this type of
Q:     grammar because you made same error TWICE.  This means, those are not
Q:     mistakes. Those must be caused from your ignorance.  Those should be

   Good logics! This tightly explains why you still post junk here!

Q:     "... you were.."   OK?  poor guy  Huh..

  Bingo! It goes well back to you!

>>guy looks like. Yeah, maybe a smart guy always spells wrong and perhaps
>>...speaks wrong...

Q     Did you speak well here?   Explain!
 
  I just spoke right. Hey, I don't speak English *very* well. (I am a
  100% Chinese)

>->  Oh yea..  I may spell wrong sometimes but I never point out someone
>                                                ^^^^^
>                                          really? Be honest!

Q:     Oh, dear !   This one shows how much idiot and tiny guy you are.

  Gee, please tell me - what did this sentence mean? You are really idiotic.
  Tiny? Nupe!

Q:     I am sure you don't understand what my intention was.  Throughout
Q:     this funny argument,  do you think I was trying to make an issue for

  Yes, it is funny!

Q:     your spells and grammar stuff rather than pointing out your funny
Q:     junk attitude stuff ?   You are really a petty man

  Only you think so. You are really a small-minded person.

>-> else's minor mistakes and make an issue for it because I am such a

>   Yes, you are :-)

Q:     I don't want to be a same kind of guy as you are.

  Sure, you are not *a* same kind of guy as I am. Wait, so, _what_ are you?

>-> smart guy as you know well.

>   Is it a bad thing to keep you learning, huh? Don't your teachers
>   always point out your mistakes that you might think they are minor?

Q:      So,  are you an  English teacher?  Do English teachers make
Q:      errors in spells and grammar when they point out students'
Q:      spells and grammar mistakes?  Maybe in Taiwan.. interesting..

  If all the students are like you, it will be more interesting.
  Hopefully, Taiwanese students are not nutty enough to reach your
  level. That will be great if you can tell us how English teachers
  do in korea. Are they better than you? ....interesting...

>   Yeah, you might be a little bit smarter than your poor folks. But,
>   as you know, when you get out your ivory tower, you should have

Q:      Ding Dong!  Look !  Can you find your grammar error here again?
Q:      Please.. please  know yourself!  If you don't have a brain to

  Now, you tend to like the job of being an English teacher! Yeah, tell
  me the errors and I will appreciate. I will never think this will
  be disgusting to me. See the difference? And then, tell me who is
  petty, huh?

Q:      consider, just keep quiet!    YOU REALLY ARE NOT THE PERSON

  This is really petty!

Q:      WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO CORRECT GRAMMAR ERRORS FOR THE OTHERS.  Don't

  I will always forgive the childish arguments that are made by a *petty*
  man. 

Q:      be stupid!  Do not make a issue for those little stuff.  Stick to

  Yes, don't be stupid! Originally, I thought you may be a little smart.
  But, somehow the word just does not fit you. Please do forget my
  previous *stupid* judgment. 

Q:      the topic !

  What else do you have? "Look! Stupid Koreans"??????

>   known you are just one of numerous humans and nothing special.
>   To open a strong statement does not help you to be a smart guy.
>   I do not know you well...but, your statements let people know
>   you quite well.                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Q:      So, this is what you have to say for yourself. Am I wrong ?
Q:      Explain!

  Self-explained.

>>A stupid guy named Adam Yeh

Q:      You need to speak out to the public hundreds of times.

  No, it is not necessary. You are the chief in my advertising committee.
  Feel free to use yourself as an analogy.

>->Therefore, this is right.
>->(Did you really put this statement for your mistakes ?)

>  Cool! huh? So, what is the answer?

Q:      Ask your friends. It is impossible to understand by yourself.

  I really want to reserve the answers from my friends. Believe me,
  I am very polite to you. If I said you are s*****, I would probably
  have been accused for abusing a child. By the way, did you see the
  Oprah show tonight on CBS - CHILD ABUSE? I don't want to make you
  scared silent.

> ( I guess you were under a spell, get it?  Smart Guy?! )
		     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>-> I am anxious to listen to you about your feeling. You are extremely
>-> funny guy. :-))))))))))))))))) aren't you ?

>  Ha, ha, ... You are no less funny than I am. This time I know what

Q:      Comparison ?  oh no!  I don't want to be in the funky contest !
Q:      By the way, no less?  ha...ha...  I cannot help laughing at you!

   Funky boy! Give me a break. I really feel ashamed of whoever taught
   you before. You do have a dictionary, don't you? Go and check it out.
   You entertain yourself quite well. I admire your humor sense.

Q:      So, you admit that you are funny aren't you?  (I am not!)

   Are you serious? Being a funny guy is not easy. You really deserve
   it. Be proud of it and, as people know, you do have two brushes.
   We are simply lagging too far.

>  you meant (the grammar was forgiven). By the way, did you know

Q:      Make sure to tell me how your grammar was!

  It was OK. But, yours is still ...
  
>  what I meant?

Q:      What you meant?  I don't have to listen to petty man because
Q:      I don't have time to waste.

  I have no time to explain to you - you are finally right.
  I need to deal with too many studious people, sometimes I prefer
  that they can learn by themselves.

>-> Anyway, I don't believe those mistakes are big deal to concern.

>   So do I.

Q:      Then, why you made an issue for it? (Dose your brain work well?

  Did I? Don't put me wrong. Yes, my brain works very well. How about
  yours? I guess your cooling system needs some adjustment. Adding some
  cold water might be helpful to calm you down.

Q:      I doubt it... perhaps, just functioning...) Look at your logic!

  No surprise! You doubt because your brain does not function.
  "I think, therefore I am" --- Rene Descartes.
  The very act of doubting calls for a mind?? Oops, your mind
  has gone too far.

Q:       1. Committing errors in spells and grammar are no big deal
Q:       2. You agree
Q:       3. Then, no problem for both of us.
Q          (Then, what are you doing here? what is your intention? )

Q:      If '1' is true AND '2' is true then '3' should be true. But 3 is
Q:      not true according to you.  What is the problem?

  Yes, it is no big deal. The big deal is you did not send the right
  messages in the right way. People will be misled or confused. Maybe
  you just wanted to express your opinions from your viewpoint at
  beginning, however the outcomes turned out to be a weird misunderstanding.
  Again, your premises in these statements are vague. The conclusions
  drawn by you are according to your logics, which are not convincible.
  However, I appreciate your effort. Thanks for trying so hard to make
  things straightout.

  I do not have any problem with you, even your grammar:-).

>-> Additionally what I want to advice to you is, paying attention

>   Thanks very much.

>-> to what the article want to say, is much more important than

>   What did "Look! Stupid Taiwanese" want to say except insulting
>   people?

Q:      If you still don't understand it,  give up to save your life!
Q:      Do you believe that my intention was only for insulting Taiwanese?
Q:      Look carefully. Those are only for "Stupid Taiwanese" as it said.

  If English is your mother language, I probably will be forced to
  accept this interpretation. Let me tell you -- It SIMPLY does not
  say what you mean. If you still do not get it, also please give
  up to save your life. These comments are only for *smart* people.

Q:      I certainly believe there are many smart and nice Taiwanese.

  You are right.

Q:      (Don't think you are the one of them)

  Maybe! (to you) 
  Well, good advice always makes people mad.

>-> finding out spells and grammar errors. If you don't agree with

>  I am really tired of your erroneous sentences.
>  If you did not spell right words and organize sentences according
>  to the grammar. How do people know what you exactly want to say.

Q:     Can't understand?  Your brain must be damaged or congenital
Q:     problem.  See your doctor. I do understand what you want to say

  "My brain must be congenital problem?" What was that?
  I bet that you got a congenitally-damaged brain. Jesus!
  
Q:     although you made many errors (Be smart!)

  Look at you, I would rather stay at my part. You go ahead to be a 
  smart guy.

>-> me, welcome to find those stupid errors in the hundreds of papers

>  I definitely disagree with you. But, again, why I bother to find
>  errors in books and papers. What were you trying to say here?

Q:     Oh, it could be hard to understand to you without explanation.
Q:     If you think so, why you made an issue for my spells and grammar
Q:     stuff?  Do you want to scarify for me or just want to waste time ?
Q:     What do you want?  Your existence is only for checking MY grammar
Q:     and spells?  Is this  why you checked ONLY mine?  Does your life
Q:     belong to me?  (I don't want to have a slave though)

  Yes, it is. Well, tell you the truth. I only look at the subjects
  I like when am reading news. Unfortunately, your subject interested
  me very much. Again, I did not make an issue for your spelling and
  grammar stuff. I simply pointed out the fact and how I felt. May I?

  I don't intend to scarify or criticize you. (I feel sorry if you
  have this sort of feeling) Why you? The reason is that you like to
  get yourself in flames when you magnify others' points.

  What is what? "Does my life belong to you?" Is this another logic?
  
  But you might need a master!:-)

>  Is this the seoncd logic law in the world?
		^^
Q:     Hey, silly guy,  here is another one!  It is not nice thing to
Q:     make errors again and again especially, if your issue were only for
Q:     checking spells and grammars?  (I even cannot laugh any longer)
Q:     Explain if you disagree with me!  (Am I still wrong?)

  Oh, you got a typo here. Thanks!
  Not silly enough to achieve you.
  I don't want to mention these repeated issues. (But, do review your sentences  )

>-> and books for ever and ever.

>-> Now, here,  you need to say  one more time about yourself.

>>A stupid guy named Adam Yeah

Q:    Even one more time is not enough.

Q:    n=1;
Q:    while (computer is alive)
Q:    {
Q:      printf("%d A stupid guy named Adam Yeah\n",n);
Q:      printf(" But Adam never understand how much stupid he is "n\n");
Q:      n++;
Q:    }

  I do not think this program can work! Let me modify for you:

#include <stdio.h>
#define computer-is-alive 1

main()

{
 int n;

    n=1;
    while (computer-is-alive)
    {
      printf("A stupid guy named Adam Yeah is counting %d \n", n);
      printf("But Mr. Park still doesn't understand how %d-time(s) 
              stupid he is \n", n);
      n++;
    }  
}

  How does it look like? I guarantee that it works. You just need to compile
  it and then run it.
 
Q:   Adam, don't bother to understand what it does.  You may OK.

  Park, don't be sad. You still have some other things to play with.

>-> Good :-)))

> Thanks for broadcasting. You are really funky enough. Of course,
> you are the funniest man I ever knew. I doubt very much about
> your cognition :-)

> Cheers,

> Adam

Q:    Hey, petty guy. If you have a brain, do you really think I am
Q:    the one who is really funny?  If you do not have high enough
Q:    IQ score, you may have to ask help from the others.

  You do have enough IQ to comment on my IQ? Which sign shows?

Q:    ASK OTHER PEOPLE ABOUT YOUR FUNNY JUNK ARTICLE!  This is EXTREMELY

  If you think it is junk, do not bother to post the follow-ups.

Q:    STUPID TO MAKE AN ISSUE!  If you did not agree with what I thought,

  I can not remember how many times you try to remind readers that the issues
  are grammar and spelling! And, again, who is heating up the topic?

Q:    you should have explained your mind logically and persuasively how
Q:    you disagree with me. Causing trouble in spells and grammar in order

  Shown here.

Q:    to hurt somebody, is only idiot petty guy's coarse behavior (I really

  I guess I did not hurt you :-)

Q:    gave you up at this time!) and those are just noise not a words.

  Yeah, I can see that you gave up in this line. Sigh, Agree.
  Keep working! Have a nice weekend! 

Q: C.S. Park


  regards,

  - Adam