HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dale@manet.wustl.edu (Dale Frye)
Subject: Re: Momenta/PenPoint vs. Microsoft
Reply-To: dale@manet.wustl.edu
Organization: Washington University, School of Engineering, St. Louis MO
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 22:25:52 GMT

In article <1992Dec30.045755.25687@news.media.mit.edu>  
testarne@barking.media.mit.edu (Thad E Starner) writes:
> 	Does the PenPoint operating system use 32bit pointers by default
> or do they do the FAR/NEAR trick of Microsoft (just spent a couple of
> days of misdirection, excuse the pun, on that one).
> 

PenPoint is entirely 32-bit.  No FAR/NEAR tricks. In the DR (Developer's  
Release) all pointers had to be defined as FAR because of the compiler  
(Microsoft C) but since they switched to Watcom C you no longer have to do  
it. (In fact if you do it you'll get a syntax error.) If you don't know  
Windows already then I would highly suggest taking a look at PenPoint  
(even if you are familar with Windows).  There's a lot more to PenPoint  
than just the pen. It is the only complete object-oriented OS available  
today. PenPoint is now where other OS vendors plan to be in 2 years. (Next  
major release of OS/2, based on MACH and the release after next of Windows  
NT, Cairo) Even if GO fails (I don't think it will) what you learn from  
PenPoint about OOOS, UI, Application Framework and a bunch of other stuff  
will be quite valuable. There is an incredible amount of new ideas in  
there along with a bunch of stuff borrowed from the likes of MacApp and  
ET++. One word of caution, PenPoint is not DOS or UNIX. Be prepared to  
learn new ways of doing things. The first is understanding the application  
instance lifecycle. The second is the concept of processes and tasks.  
(i.e. A process is just memory allocation in which mulitple tasks can be  
running.)  And of course there's learning about OO design and programming  
if you haven't done that before.


Dale Frye
Washington University in St. Louis


Newsgroups: comp.sys.pen
From: rparker@world.std.com (Randy Parker)
Subject: Boston pen-based meeting
Organization: NoteSystems, Brookline, MA
Distribution: comp.sys.pen
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 23:42:04 GMT


            BOSTON COMPUTER SOCIETY PEN COMPUTING SIG (BCS*PEN)
                             JANUARY MEETING

                The Joys and Pains of PenPoint Development

              Wednesday, January 6th, 7pm -- MIT, Room 4-163


        With the recent announcement by AT&T and EO of
        "Personal Communicators" (combination
        cellular-phone/notepad computers), it appears that GO's
        PenPoint operating system is gaining wider industry
        support.  1993 holds great promise for PenPoint
        supporters, and tonight some of PenPoint's pioneering
        software developers give you the inside scoop.
        Principals from First Pen Systems, PenFact, and other
        leading companies share with you their successes and
        frustrations in developing for this "operating system
        of the future."  (Plus all the usual giveaways, rumors,
        and networking.)  Co-sponsored with the New England
        chapter of the Worldwide PenPoint Developers
        Organization (WPDO).

        For more information, contact Randy Parker (75300.2654@compuserve.com)
        Location:          MIT, Building 4, room 163, Cambridge, MA.
        Directions:        Kendall Square/MIT stop on the Red Line.  
                           Parking along Memorial Dr. 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.pen
From: dale@manet.wustl.edu (Dale Frye)
Subject: Smallest PenPoint App (code size)
Reply-To: dale@manet.wustl.edu
Organization: Washington University, School of Engineering, St. Louis MO
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 16:54:38 GMT

My boss asked me to come up with the minimum size PenPoint app. I took  
EmptyApp and cut out everything I felt not needed. I threw out the  
method.tbl (not needed if not handling any messages) and stripped out  
everything not needed. My question:  Is there anything else that can be
stripped out?  I did compile and run the code.

Dale Frye
Washington University in St. Louis

----------------------------------------------------------
/********* emptyapp.c *************/
#include <app.h>
#include <appmgr.h>				// for AppMgr startup  
stuff
#define	clsEmptyApp		wknGDTa
STATUS ClsEmptyAppInit (void)
{
	APP_MGR_NEW	new;
	ObjectCall(msgNewDefaults, clsAppMgr, &new);
	new.object.uid	 		  	= clsEmptyApp;
	new.cls.ancestor			= clsApp;
	new.cls.newArgsSize			= SizeOf(APP_NEW);
	ObjectCall(msgNew, clsAppMgr, &new);
	return stsOK;
} /* ClsEmptyAppInit */
void CDECL main (
	int			argc,
	char *		argv[],
	U16			processCount)
{
	if (processCount == 0) {
		ClsEmptyAppInit();
		AppMonitorMain(clsEmptyApp, objNull);
	} else {
		AppMain();
	}
	Unused(argc); Unused(argv);} /* main */

Newsgroups: comp.sys.pen
From: cew@netcom.com (Clayton Weimer)
Subject: Re: Smallest PenPoint App (code size)
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 03:23:15 GMT

dale@manet.wustl.edu (Dale Frye) writes:

>In article <1heotpINNe0r@nigel.msen.com> ggolden@msen.com (Glenn Golden)  
>EMPTYAPP EXE     11120 12-24-92   9:57a

Still seems large, was this compiled with DEBUG on?  I've had
apps below 5k, and they are useful too :-)

BTW, what is your boss really trying to figure out anyway?

-- 
-- Clay             
                    These views are my own, and when they change my
                    observers will be notified.
   Obvion     
   cew@netcom.com
   off  408-227-1319
From: ggolden@msen.com (Glenn Golden)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.pen
Subject: Re: Smallest PenPoint App (code size)
Date: 25 Dec 1992 10:48:11 GMT
Organization: Msen, Inc. -- Ann Arbor, Michigan
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.msen.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]

Dale Frye (dale@manet.wustl.edu) wrote:
: My boss asked me to come up with the minimum size PenPoint app. I took  
: EmptyApp and cut out everything I felt not needed. I threw out the  
: method.tbl (not needed if not handling any messages) and stripped out  
: everything not needed. My question:  Is there anything else that can be
: stripped out?  I did compile and run the code.

: Dale Frye
: Washington University in St. Louis

:[code segment cut out ...]

So... just how big is it?

- Glenn R. Golden  |  Global Architect @ Comshare, Inc. |  Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  (home) ggolden@msen.com   (work) ggolden@comshare.com
From: rhg@cpsolv.CPS.COM (Richard H. Gumpertz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
Subject: Re: Expansion box info needed
Date: 29 Dec 92 14:35:45 GMT
Organization: Computer Problem Solving, Leawood, Kansas, USA

In article <1992Dec28.045136.5170@ultb.isc.rit.edu> kgb8752@ultb.isc.rit.edu (K.G. Brayton) writes:
>I managed to come across one of those semi-mythical expansion boxes for
>my 3b1 (or rather, it found me).  Anyway, I have no documentation or
>anything of the sort.  Just the box, the card and the cable.
...
>  1)  Do I need any software for this?  Drivers or anything?

No.

>  2)  What cards can I or can't I plug into the box?

The only official restriction is that memory must be in the CPU chassis.

>If I remember right, it doesn't like combo boards in the box

A combo card WITHOUT memory installed should work OK in the expansion box;
one WITH any memory won't work in the expansion box.

-- 
  ==========================================================================
  | Richard H. Gumpertz      rhg@CPS.COM       VOICE & FAX: (913) 642-1777 |
  | Computer Problem Solving, 8905 Mohawk Lane, Leawood, Kansas 66206-1749 |
  ==========================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
From: bdb@becker.GTS.ORG (Bruce Becker)
Subject: Re: HD crash / req info 2nd drive
Keywords: MFM crash upgrade
Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 04:32:59 GMT

In article <1992Dec27.175659.1751@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> mad@Turing.ORG (Mark A. Day (N4OQK)) writes:
|One of the 7300's major flaws is its power supply. In the world of switching
|power supplies, this one's a real wimp. If possible, upgrade to a 3b1 power
|supply. Alas, the 3b1 power supply is not THAT much more robust, as I have
|had the same problems with large drives which require say, greater than 4amps
|of current drain. I finally opted for an external drive supply, and take some
|of the load off the main supply.


	I don't understand this.  This system is using
	a standard 3B1 supply to power 2 Maxtor XT-2190
	drives, an ethernet card, and a combo card with
	1.5 megs of memory.  It's been doing this for
	years (with only the infrequent problem of needing
	to clean the connectors from time to time), and
	it doesn't even really produce very much heat
	either.


|Anyone heard of a power supply retrofit for the 3b1/7300?


	Any PClone power supply should do fine if you
	get the proper connectors for it to hook up
	to the motherboard...


-- 
  ,u,	 Bruce Becker			Toronto, Ontario
a /i/	 Internet: bdb@becker.gts.org	Uucp: ...!web!becker!bdb
 `\o\-e  "...symbolising Excitement and Fun."		
 _< /_		-- Disneyland North investment brochure
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1,comp.mail.misc
From: bdb@becker.GTS.ORG (Bruce Becker)
Subject: Re: Sendmail problem on AT&T unix 7300 (3b1).
Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:38:33 GMT

In article <1992Dec29.203409.9037@sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM> lilb@sony.compuserve.com (Bruce Lilly) writes:
|In article <1992Dec28.184517.19016@gagme.chi.il.us> wdp@gagme.chi.il.us (Bill Pfeiffer) wrote:
|>I run sendmail 3.1 on my unixpc 7300 and I have a problem.  Letters
|>get stuck in the directory /usr/spool/smail/input [...]
|                                       ^^^^^
|M'boy, what you have is *not* sendmail. It is an inferior (IMO)
|program known as "smail".  Please don't blame your smail
|problems on sendmail.


	Smail 3.1 is definitely superior to sendmail
	in many respects.  However the ability to
	time out undeliverables in the input queue
	was only recently implemented, so you need
	to access version 28 or higher of smail 3.1
	in order to get this functionality.  It's
	available via ftp form many sites, including
	ftp.uu.net.


-- 
  ,u,	 Bruce Becker			Toronto, Ontario
a /i/	 Internet: bdb@becker.gts.org	Uucp: ...!web!becker!bdb
 `\o\-e  "...symbolising Excitement and Fun."		
 _< /_		-- Disneyland North investment brochure
From: steve@zero.com (Steve Urich)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
Subject: Re: smail 2.7?
Keywords: ready?  abandoned?
Date: 3 Jan 93 15:49:58 GMT
Organization: Beyonet - Zero Network

In <1993Jan2.001955.7494@becker.GTS.ORG>, bdb@becker.GTS.ORG writes:

>	Smail 2.7 is still being worked on - my
	What does Smail 2.7 provide that Smail 3.1~ doesn't besides size and
	tcp stuff? Is it just a bug fix for smail 2.5? I thought they already
	did that or at least I've seen patches for smail 2.5 for bug fixes.
>-- 
>  ,u,	 Bruce Becker			Toronto, Ontario


-- 
|Stephen Urich|        Internet:steve@zero.com         | "Cattle mutilations |
|NIC: SU2     |        UUCP:uunet!beyonet!steve        | are up!" --Sneakers |
|ARS: WB3FTP  | Packet:WB3FTP@WB3FTP.#EPA.PA.USA.NOAM  | ax25<->PBBS<->IPGATE|
|Bensalem, PA |Radio:wb3ftp@wb3ftp.ampr.org[44.80.8.44]| TCP/IP-FTP-SMTP-UNIX|
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1,comp.mail.misc
From: bruce@blilly.UUCP (Bruce Lilly)
Subject: Re: Sendmail problem on AT&T unix 7300 (3b1).
Organization: Bruce Lilly
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 93 21:29:09 GMT
Reply-To: lilb@sony.compuserve.com (Bruce Lilly)

In article <1993Jan1.233818.23404@galaxia.network23.com>,
 posted to comp.sys.3b1,comp.mail.misc,
 dave@galaxia.network23.com (David H. Brierley) wrote:
>
>The version of sendmail that is in the archives on osu-cis and uunet *is*
>the UIUC/IDA version.

Well, *one* of the archived versions of sendmail on osu-cis is an UIUC/IDA
version (unless the old one has been deleted recently).

As there is some compilation-time configuration when building sendmail, one
might also wish to compile sendmail from the sources, rather than use the
binary version, unless one is certain that one wants the configuration
options that were compiled in, and that one doesn't want the configuration
options that were left out, assuming one knows how the binary version was
configured.

Also, one might want to use the most recent sources.

-- 
	Bruce Lilly		blilly!bruce@Broadcast.Sony.COM
					...uunet!sonyusa!sonyd1!blilly!bruce
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1,comp.mail.misc
From: bruce@sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM (Bruce Lilly)
Subject: Re: Sendmail problem on AT&T unix 7300 (3b1).
Organization: Bruce Lilly
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 20:34:09 GMT
Reply-To: lilb@sony.compuserve.com (Bruce Lilly)

In article <1992Dec28.184517.19016@gagme.chi.il.us> wdp@gagme.chi.il.us (Bill Pfeiffer) wrote:
>I run sendmail 3.1 on my unixpc 7300 and I have a problem.  Letters
>get stuck in the directory /usr/spool/smail/input [...]
                                       ^^^^^
M'boy, what you have is *not* sendmail. It is an inferior (IMO)
program known as "smail".  Please don't blame your smail
problems on sendmail.

You can get a version of real sendmail that runs on the 7300
from the archives at osu-cis, or you can compile the UIUC/IDA
sendmail package, available via anonymous ftp from
uxc.cso.uiuc.edu.

-- 
    Bruce Lilly, Product Manager,      | bruce@Broadcast.Sony.COM
    Routers, Peripherals & Still Store,| uunet!sonyusa!sonyd1!bruce
    Sony, 3 Paragon Drive, Montvale,   | lilb@sony.compuserve.com (slow)
    NJ 07645-1735  |  Telephone: +1 201 358 4161  |  FAX: +1 201 358 4274
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
From: ape@eskimo.com (Mark Newland)
Subject: Shell program problem
Organization: -> ESKIMO NORTH (206) For-Ever <-
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 10:23:02 GMT


I love my 3b1 except for the fact thats it's too small.  I only have 1Meg RAM
and a puny 20Meg HD.  I know, I know, buy a bigger drive!  Until then I have
most of my programs on floppys.  I am willing to run off floppy but there is
the hassle of mounting and unmounting the drive, etc.  I figured I could write
a shell program to handle this for me.  As a test I wrote the following shell
script.  Everything works just fine except that after the program is completed,
it does not unmount the floppy.  Is there a way I can have the floppy unmount
itself after the program is ran?   Should I look closer at the fork command?
I suspect that the termination of the $PROGRAM also terminates my shell
program itself.


----------------------
foo.sh
----------------------
DISK_LABEL = bar(1)
PROGRAM = foo

message -i "Enter $DISK_LABEL disk\n\nPress ENTER to continue" 

mount /dev/fp021 /mnt
/mnt/$PROGRAM
umount /dev/fp021

Xref: sparky comp.sys.3b1:4145 comp.mail.misc:4182
From: gst@gnosys.svle.ma.us (Gary S. Trujillo)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1,comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Sendmail problem on AT&T unix 7300 (3b1).
Date: 31 Dec 92 20:02:44 GMT

In <1992Dec29.203409.9037@sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM>
	bruce@sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM (Bruce Lilly) writes:

> M'boy, what you have is *not* sendmail. It is an inferior (IMO)
> program known as "smail".  Please don't blame your smail
> problems on sendmail.

Well, let's not confuse plain old smail (2.5...) with smail 3.1, which I've 
been running with great pleasure and success for several years on my 3B1.
Smail 3.1 combines the functionality of both smail (2+) and sendmail, and
is fairly easy to run.  I use it to handle some high-volume mailing lists.
The smail 3.1 program has little or nothing to do with smail 2.5.  In fact,
I think it was written by different people - from the ground up, so it
really bears no relationship to the earlier program of the same name.

Smail 3.1 knows how to batch things and send to aliases and all the things
that sendmail does, without having to learn some funny configuration
language.  Smail 3.1 can be obtained from a number of ftp archive sites,
including:

	uunet.uu.net or ftp.uu.net	- United States
	archive.EU.net			- somewhere in Europe
	hp4nl.nluug.nl			- the Netherlands

It's in ~ftp/mail/smail/smail-3.1.<latest-release>.tar.Z on uunet.

There are now two smail 3.1 discussion lists maintained by Lyndon
Nerenberg, lyndon@cs.athabascau.ca: smail3-users and smail3-wizards.
To subscribe send mail to:

	smail3-users-request@cs.athabascau.ca

Smail 3.1 is public domain software.  I have no connection with
these folks, except as a very satisfied user.

Gary
--
    Gary S. Trujillo                            gst@gnosys.svle.ma.us
Somerville, Massachusetts              {wjh12,bu.edu,spdcc,ima,cdp}!gnosys!gst
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
From: mad@Turing.ORG (Mark A. Day (N4OQK))
Subject: Re: Needed Circuit boards for MiniScribe 6085 HD
Keywords: Miniscribe 6085 boards
Organization: The Turing Project, Public Access Internet Host
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:29:38 GMT

Just out of curiosity, what were the symptoms of the 6085's crashes? I have
one here that appears to have bad media. Will consider trade for 3b1 power
supply.

-- 
________________________________________________________________________

| Mark A. Day  Hardware Technician, Sawkill Engineering, Inc.		|	
| USMail  1612 Rickey Road Charlottesville VA 22901  			|
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1,comp.mail.misc
From: ebd@fang.att.com (Elliot B Dierksen)
Subject: Re: Sendmail problem on AT&T unix 7300 (3b1).
Organization: AT&T Tax Systems Development, Maitland FL
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 09:50:45 GMT

In article <1992Dec29.203409.9037@sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM> lilb@sony.compuserve.com (Bruce Lilly) writes:
>In article <1992Dec28.184517.19016@gagme.chi.il.us> wdp@gagme.chi.il.us (Bill Pfeiffer) wrote:
>>I run sendmail 3.1 on my unixpc 7300 and I have a problem.  Letters
>>get stuck in the directory /usr/spool/smail/input [...]
>                                       ^^^^^
>M'boy, what you have is *not* sendmail. It is an inferior (IMO)
>program known as "smail".  Please don't blame your smail
>problems on sendmail.

I don't mean to start a religious war here, but why do you think smail is
inferior? I have read the documentation for sendmail, consider myself fairly
computer literate, and sendmail.cf's still make blood run out of my ears! In
as far as I can tell, smail does everything sendmail will do and is much
easier to maintain.

Yours in asbestos,

EBD
-- 
Elliot Dierksen   "Is that a real poncho... I mean is that a Mexican poncho or
                   is that a Sears  poncho?  Hmmm... no foolin'..." -- F. Zappa

W) e.dierksen@att.com  (407) 660-3377     H) elliot@alfred.UUCP  (407) 290-9744
From: andy@cs.caltech.edu (Andy Fyfe)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
Subject: Updates to the 3b1 archive at Caltech
Date: 3 Jan 1993 00:38:23 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: kodiak.cs.caltech.edu

I've made the following changes to the 3b1 archive here at Caltech,
ftp.cs.caltech.edu:pub/3b1/, in the last month or so.

gnucpio: This is the gnu version of cpio.  It also understands tar files.

tcsh: I've updated tcsh to version 6.03.

gcc: I've updated gcc to version 2.3.3.  The objects for gcc 1.42 have
     been recompiled with gcc 2.3.3.

f2c: I've updated f2c.  The version is current as of the end of 1992.

J: I've updated J to version 6.2.

emacs: I've updated emacs to 18.59.  It includes Brant Cheikes' patches
       for the 3b1 mouse.  This is not a complete distribution (in
       particular, it has only a few of the lisp files).

Fetch the file README for an overview, and the file Index for details
about version numbers, etc.

Here are the usage statistics for the 3b1 section of the archive
(since the start of October):
						     ---- Percent  of ----
    Archive Section           Files Sent Bytes  Sent Files Sent Bytes Sent
    ------------------------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
    pub/3b1                         2021   150460825    38.56      13.74

Happy New Year!

Andy Fyfe					andy@cs.caltech.edu
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Tuesday, 29 Dec 1992 14:07:18 CST
From: <U43610@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
Subject: Wanted: 3b1 Keyboard

Mine is gone..   If anyone has a reasonably priced 3B1 keyboard, please drop me
 a line..    Thanks in advance..
-
U43610@uicvm.cc.uic.edu
-
Ken
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
From: cwr@crash.cts.com (Will Rose)
Subject: AT&T 7600
Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA
Date: 21 Dec 92 18:45:56 PST


Basically, does this machine exist or is it a misprint for a 7300?
Whatever it is, it has a CPU and a couple of terminals of unknown
type, and  I was wondering if it was worth investigating further.

Answers best by email, probably.

Thanks - Will
cwr@crash.cts.com

Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
From: bdb@becker.GTS.ORG (Bruce Becker)
Subject: Re: smail 2.7?
Keywords: ready?  abandoned?
Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 00:19:55 GMT

In article <1992Dec31.125800.19746@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> k2ph@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (The QRPer) writes:
|As long as some of us are into a smail vs. sendmail thread... :-)
|
|Earlier this year, I exchanged e-mail with someone in this group
|about the possibility of a smail version 2.7 coming out.  Since
|then, I've lost the name and address of whoever it was.  Could
|that person please contact me at bob@mtdcr.att.com?  Thanks.
|I'm willing to be a beta site.  :-)


	Smail 2.7 is still being worked on - my
	information is that there are enough beta
	testers to keep track of already 8^), but
	that it should be nearing completion soon.
	When it does the announcements will appear
	in all the standard places, & I'll try to
	ensure that something's also posted here...


-- 
  ,u,	 Bruce Becker			Toronto, Ontario
a /i/	 Internet: bdb@becker.gts.org	Uucp: ...!web!becker!bdb
 `\o\-e  "...symbolising Excitement and Fun."		
 _< /_		-- Disneyland North investment brochure
From: mad@Turing.ORG (Mark A. Day (N4OQK))
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
Subject: Re: Wanted circuit boards for Miniscribe 6085
Keywords: Miniscribe 6085
Date: 27 Dec 92 17:45:10 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: The Turing Project, Public Access Internet Host

I have found a problem with the 6085 Miniscribe which may help you bring a 
few of them up. This problem seems to be common to NUMEROUS miniscribe drives.

On the drive circuit board there are three TO-220 packaged MOSFETs. These are
numbered Q1, Q2, and Q3. These mosfets are VERY shoddily heatsinked, and end
up destroying themselves because of same. These mosfets should be of the type
IRF521 (International Rectifier) which cross to an ECG-66 replacement part.

Replacing these fets will usually bring back the drive, but do nothing for the
original problem, inadiquate heatsinking. Some form of heatsink must be 
developed to provide extended life for the new fets. 

I discovered this working with a drive which would fail after approximately an
hour of up-time. Freeze spray makes for a good method to determine if this is
the actual problem.

-- 
________________________________________________________________________

| Mark A. Day  Hardware Technician, Sawkill Engineering, Inc.		|	
| USMail  1612 Rickey Road Charlottesville VA 22901  			|
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
From: fox@wubios.wustl.edu (Dave Fox)
Subject: Wanted:  Microsoft WORD for 3B1/7300
Keywords: WORD 3B1 7300 
Organization: Division of Biostatistics, WUMS, St. Louis, MO
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 08:26:21 GMT


I would like to pick up a copy of Microsft Word for the
3B1/7300.  I am running 3.51.

If you have any info on compatibility with other PC based
WORD versions please let me know.

Please advise me via e-mail


Happy Holidays


Xref: sparky comp.sys.3b1:4156 comp.mail.misc:4221