HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tlbechar@thunder.LakeheadU.Ca (Timothy Lee Bechard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Pascal
Date: 15 Dec 1992 20:57:19 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: Lakehead University; Thunder Bay, Ont


	I am looking for Pascal for the Amiga Computer... If anyone has a
Public Domain / commercial version of it, would they please reply.

	

Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: clldomps@cs.ruu.nl (Louis van Dompselaar)
Subject: Re: GCC in smaller chunks??
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 14:00:39 GMT
Organization: Utrecht University, Dept. of Computer Science

In <Byxvux.H9E@dcs.ed.ac.uk> jxp@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Joe Potter) writes:

>In article <1992Dec4.195002.2215@dct.ac.uk>, mcscs1wji@dct.ac.uk (Bil Irving) writes:
>> I'd like to learn C++ on the Amiga, and after reading the messages in this
>> conference thought that gcc would be the best bet. But the archive is
>> over 3MB! (on amiga.physik.unizh.ch)
>
In wuarchive.wustl.edu; systems/amiga (or something)
and archie.au; micros/amiga

in directory incoming/devel

is gcc2.2.2 in 5 chunks of about 680k. 

this made lots of people very happy

Louis

-- 
>>>      m   m eeee rrrr rrrr y   y                                    <<<
>>>      mm mm e    r  r r  r y   y          O                         <<<
>>>      m m m eee  rrr  rrr   yyy          /\    Father Ascii Xmas    <<<
>>>      m   m e    r  r r  r   y          /  \                        <<<
From: tron@uni-paderborn.de (Matthias Scheler)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: MPEG on the Amiga
Date: 18 Dec 1992 12:00:27 GMT
Organization: Uni-GH Paderborn, Germany
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: wembley.uni-paderborn.de

In article <1992Dec12.205216.29093@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>, mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst) writes:
|> In <1ga0g2INN6a0@uni-paderborn.de> tron@uni-paderborn.de (Matthias Scheler) writes:
|> >There's a Amiga MPEG Player on amiga.physik.unih.ch. I couldn't test it yet,
|> >because the SS10 corrupted my MS-DOS transfer disk.
|> 
|> Seems to work fine. I'm adding EHB screen support for those that do not
|> run Workbench 3.0 on AGA machines.
|> 
|> Regards,

I think a MPEG-to-ANIM5-converter with HAM(8) support would be the much better choice.
You could archive anims as small MPEG files and convert them to larger ANIM5 files,
beforcer viewing.

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                         tron@uni-paderborn.de
University of Paderborn (Germany)
Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.programmer:17589 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:21838
From: andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy Finkel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Attn Commodore: You are making a Big Mistake (Hardware
Date: 18 Dec 92 16:08:49 GMT
Reply-To: andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy Finkel)
Organization: Flying Cat, Inc.

In article <0P5VVB4w165w@lakes.trenton.sc.us> rock@lakes.trenton.sc.us (Rockerboy) writes:
>TomK@cup.portal.com (Tom R Krotchko) writes:
>> No, in fact the cache only helped one game, and that game was SimCity.
>> The copy protection used self-modifying code, and the caches seemed to
>> put a kink in that scheme.
>
>C= very specifically says not to do this.  Kind of interesting that Sim 
>City, which some people have claimed as a well behaved OS game, violates 
>such a simple thing as the rule against self modifying code...;)


Copy protection is generally added by people other than those who
programmed the game.  Often, its added by programmers hired by
the game publisher.  Generally, those people seem to be those
who claim to understand the machine at its lowest level, ie democoders.
Remember, the idea of copy protection is to allow as few people
as possible to actually run the program :-)

Without trying hard, I can come up with 10 programs that would have 
worked fine under the OS, but got trashed by the copy protection.
(Granted, I analyzed a number of those programs to find out
 why they had problems under 2.0;  otherwise I might not know
 the extent of the problem).


			andy

(How do I know they were democoders ?  Easy.  Democoders _always_
sign their work :-)  )
-- 
andy finkel		andy@cbmvax.commodore.com

"Unix is the Operating System of the future, and always will be."

Any expressed opinions are mine; but feel free to share.
I disclaim all responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors.
From: fheitkamp@desire.wright.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Help with GCC and G++
Date: 20 Dec 92 10:04:31 EST
Organization:  Wright State University 

In article <1992Dec19.152246.6286@desire.wright.edu>, fheitkamp@desire.wright.edu writes:
> In article <1992Dec18.131626.834@fwi.uva.nl>, solorzan@fwi.uva.nl (Valik Solorzano (I88)) writes:
>> Hai everyone,
>> I'm having problems trying to compile a C++ program with gcc on my Amiga.
>> Every time I try I get a lot of errors, and the same program I did compile
>> on a Sun Workstation with gcc any I din't get any errors.
>> 
>> Is this because I'm not using the C++ version of gcc or what. Because when
>> I try to use g++ on my Amiga I get the message 'g++ not executable'.
>> 
>> Could someone tell me what i'm doing wrong.
>> I use the gcc port for the Amiga, version 2.2.2.
> 
> 	You need to make sure your program has a .cc extension otherwise
> 	gcc thinks it's a C program instead of C++.  I have gotton a C++
> 	program to compile using the above suggestion and the following
> 	command line: gcc [filename].cc -lg++ -o [filename]
> 
> 	I'm still getting an Error message:  undefined symbol
> 	___new_handler referenced from text segment.
> 
> 	Does anyone know this one?

	I can answer my own question:  You need the gcc222-fix1.lha patch.
	I applied this to the gcc: and now it works!  (I only compiled a
	small program though, but hey...)

> 
>> 
>> Thanks to all
>> 
>> You can contact me at:
>> 
>> solorzan@carol.fwi.uva.nl
>> 
>> ------Valik----
> Fred Heitkamp ** Not an organization **
Me again
From: fjeske@amiganet.chi.il.us (Felix Jeske)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: A replacement for Newshell
Date: 18 Dec 92 21:22:23 CST
Organization: Amiga Network Information Systems

I just wanted to thank all of the people who responded to my request for
information about a replacement for Newshell.  It looks like WShell is the
winner here.  I agree with the one guy who mentioned that it was too bad that
C= didn't include WShell with the new OS like they did ARexx (especially since
Bill Hawes wrote both).  I've always felt that the Amiga is a great machine to
program on short of UNIX.  WShell will top it off nicely.  Thanks again.

Felix
From: andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy Finkel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Linking with amiga.lib version 2.0
Date: 21 Dec 92 04:47:19 GMT
Reply-To: andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy Finkel)
Organization: Flying Cat, Inc.

In article <1992Dec18.213813.1133@cam.compserv.utas.edu.au> dbenn@leven.appcomp.utas.edu.au (David Benn) writes:
>ARRG!
>
>Okay, I've tried blink, dlink AND alink when trying to link object modules
>produced by ZC and A68K in combination.
>
>Blink just causes a software failure to appear, dlink quits with some error
>I don't now recall, and alink quits with an error "00000086" (may be more
>0s prefixed).
>
>Can someone PLEASE help me out? The combination works fine with older
>versions of amiga.lib. If this is such an important issue, then why hasn't
>it been documented??? Or has it? I have the 2.0 NDK stuff. I can't find any
>help there and the Bantam books on AmigaDOS give no help in the ALINK
>section on errors. 
>
>Yes I know amiga.lib links fine with DICE object modules, but I *like* ZC.

Since it links fine with DICE, SAS 5.10b, SAS 6.0, HX68, Adapt, Metacomco ASM,
etc.  I'd suspect a problem with ZC.  Does ZC come with any support ?
Any source ?  If the former, you should contact them.  If the latter,
check if they have any fixed size buffers they are overflowing.

>dbenn@leven.appcomp.utas.edu.au


			andy
-- 
andy finkel		andy@cbmvax.commodore.com

"Unix is the Operating System of the future, and always will be."

Any expressed opinions are mine; but feel free to share.
I disclaim all responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors.
From: fjeske@amiganet.chi.il.us (Felix Jeske)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: A replacement for Newshell
Date: 15 Dec 92 04:32:05 GMT
Organization: Amiga Network Information Systems

I was just wondering if there are any good replacements for Newshell out there,
either commercial or PD.  I use UNIX's csh at work and miss some of its
features when I use my A3000.  I am particularly interested in file completion
and real pipes via | but want to keep Newshell's command line history and cut
and paste compatibility with 2.x.  Also, a scroll bar on the right side of the
window (like xterm) to view previous output would be neat.  

Thanks a lot.

Felix
From: aldi@phantm.UUCP (Christopher Aldi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re:  contract programmers wanted
Date: 18 Dec 92 09:09:20 GMT
Organization: Phantom Development

In article <71730@cup.portal.com> Tony-Preston@cup.portal.com (ANTHONY FRANCIS PRESTON) writes:
>That is an interesting idea, but I believe C= CATS has already done
>something similar.  They are collecting a database of all developers
>and have a list available.  

Ya, I sent mine in - only for Mr. Post Office to lost it, then send it
back to me after deadline. ;-) I think its a little to late now, but
I'll probably give CATS a call about it anyway.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Phantom Development                          Christopher E. Aldi
 P.O. Box 572                 //              UUCP: aldi%phantm@uunet.uu.net
 Plantsville, CT 06479      \X/ Amiga               aldi@phantm.uucp        
                 "Use the force Luke, don't give in to DOS."
                    "Buy an Amiga, it is your destiny..."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: jdickson@jato.jpl.nasa.gov (Jeff Dickson)
Subject: Re: Searching for DOS documentation
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 20:15:55 GMT

In article <1992Dec10.133732.6556@samba.oit.unc.edu> Todd_Lewis@unc.edu (Todd M. Lewis) writes:
>[We're bashing the Bantam manual here, so you late-comers need not
> take pot-shots at the wrong target.  Go get your own thread! :-) ]
>
>In article <1992Dec10.003945.18444@jato.jpl.nasa.gov>  
>jdickson@jato.jpl.nasa.gov (Jeff Dickson) writes:
>>	The real problem here is that the filesystem was handed over to
>>Commodore on a silver platter when they purchased the Amiga from Amiga Corp
>>back in 1985.  Plus, I don't believe the documentation was all that good 
>>either. 
>
>I'm not sure how well that early DOS was documented, but it had been
>used for some time under TRIPOS so there must have been some docs.
>BTW, I have an early copy (the White Books) that are the 3 "books"
>which now make up the Bantam manual.  They came in a multi-volume set
>that included separate Intuition, RKM Libraries and Devices vol I & II, 
>Hardware, and the 3 DOS manuals.  The 3 DOS manuals are not notably
>better or worse than their great grand-child.
>
>>[...] Commodore ought to be more up on the
>>curve nowadays (7 years later), but if they are the current release of the 
>>AmigaDOS manual certainly doesn't reflect it. Maybe Commodore shuts them out 
>>(like they do everyone else) who doesn't meet their silly requirements IMHO
>>of being a developer (have to be developing a product even if you have no
>>clue how to go about it).
>
>That just doesn't hold up.  C= gives pretty good support to their
>developers.  It's true that "the AmigaDOS manual certainly doesn't reflect it,"

I was a developer for a year - I didn't think so. Most of the questions I 
needed answers to were not mainsteam like graphics and intuition. Plus, I
wasn't to keen on the idea that you had to practically "spill the beans" 
about what you were working on to get decent answers. At the end of the year
when my renewal came up I decided not to tell Commodore what I was working on.
Afterall, it had done absolutely no good the year before. CATS wrote back and 
rejected my application saying that I did not comply to their rules. Sure, I 
could have lied to pacify them, but that wasn't ethical. 

Jeff




Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.programmer:17541 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:21785
From: bn@mndcrme.uoknor.edu (Bo Najdrovsky)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Attn Commodore: You are making a Big Mistake (Hardware
Date: 17 Dec 92 07:08:44 GMT
Organization: Operation Mindcrime
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Tom R Krotchko (TomK@cup.portal.com) wrote:
: >> Yet, Legends of Valour, a fast scrolling game does work. And doesn't
: >> blow away the OS.
: >
: >Fast scrolling ? Maybe on a A4000, they should be fined for
: >releasing such a game for the A500 -slowest game I've ever seen
: >on an Amiga,
:
: Its pretty darned fast on a 4000. As in "wow...I'm getting dizzy".
:

    I tried a demo of this game off the Amiga Format coverdisk	and  it  is
TOO fast on my 3000/25. The people in the streets just sort of	'quiver'  I
wish that they would set it up for full screen like  Wolf  3D.	Incidently,
what techique are they using to do the surfaces? Is it full  blown  texture
mapping? (by the way, I remember a discussion over at  c.s.a.games  just  a
couple of weeks back when someone said that this sort of thing can  NOT  be
done on Ami because of planar graphics system... ha!)

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Bo Najdrovsky  bn@mndcrme.uoknor.edu bn@okcforum.uoknor.edu|    //	  |
|							      |   //	  |
|      "I remember now, I remember how it started..."         | \X/ AMIGA |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst)
Subject: Re: Attn Commodore: You are making a Big Mistake (Hardware
Organization: Max-Planck-Institut f"ur Radioastronomie
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 22:08:50 GMT

In <3XgiVB7w165w@lakes.trenton.sc.us> rock@lakes.trenton.sc.us (Rockerboy) writes:
>It doesn't cost you a dime, so you have no business bitching about it, 
>Mr. Van Elst!  ;)

I may bitch as long as the 'so cool' demo coders write software that I can't
use without buying an A500 while they still insist on doing the right thing.

For me, most demos are plain garbage.

Regards,
-- 
Michael van Elst
UUCP:     universe!local-cluster!milky-way!sol!earth!uunet!unido!mpirbn!p554mve
Internet: p554mve@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: walker@twix.unx.sas.com (Doug Walker)
Subject: Re: EMITS (SAS)
Originator: walker@twix.unx.sas.com
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:30:30 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: SAS Institute Inc.


In article <1992Dec15.030711.15186@eskimo.com>, dwdyer@eskimo.com (Wayne Dyer) writes:
|> I seem to recall that EMITS is part of SAS's technical support included
|> with 6.0 -- but, I can't -=find=- anything regarding it in the stuff 
|> they sent me with 6.0.

User's Guide, Volume I, Chapter 3, page 31,
"Contacting Technical Support through Internet or Usenet"

|> Wayne Dyer, aka   || "I mistrust all systematizers and I avoid them.
|> dwdyer@eskimo.com ||  The will to a system is a lack of integrity."  F.W.N.

-- 
  *****
=*|_o_o|\\=====Doug Walker, Software Distiller====== BBS: (919)460-7430 =
 *|. o.| ||                                          1200/2400/9600 Dual
  | o  |//     For all you do, this bug's for you!
  ====== 
usenet: walker@unx.sas.com                            bix: djwalker 
Any opinions expressed are mine, not those of SAS Institute, Inc.
From: jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz (John Bickers)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: HELP - malloc, realloc
Date: 15 Dec 92 08:42:28 PST
Organization: TAP

Quoted from <Douglas_Stockman.1l2o@grace.UUCP> by Douglas_Stockman@grace.UUCP (Douglas Stockman):

> working without any enforcer hits for malloc() and free() of ***ptr, but I
> am not having much luck correctly enlarging the buffer using realloc().  I

    You should be able to get away with:

        ptr = (cast)realloc(ptr,newsize);

    What goes wrong with that?
--
*** John Bickers, TAP.                   jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz ***
***    "Radioactivity - It's in the air, for you and me" - Kraftwerk    ***
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: byron@garfield.cs.mun.ca (Mr. Subliminal)
Subject: Ansi Specs
Organization: CS Dept., Memorial University of Newfoundland
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 21:44:19 GMT

Can someone email me or post the complete specifications for ansi terminals for
the IBM and/or Amiga?  Is there an ftp site with such information?  I am
looking for a complete list of escape codes that are used by ansi terminals.

Thanks in advance!

 Byron...
 ___________________________________________________________________________
|     ///    "Byron Montgomerie"  Internet: byron@odie.cs.mun.ca       ///  |
| \\\///      "Does anybody here remember Vera Lynn?               \\\///   |
|  \///        How she said that we would meet again,               \///    |
|  Amiga       some sunny day..." -- Pink Floyd --                 Amiga    |
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
From: meisl@forwiss.uni-passau.de (Wolfgang Meisl)
Subject: Re: CISC and RISC
Organization: University of Passau, Germany
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 18:00:13 GMT

In article <1gsqk1INN327@crcnis1.unl.edu>, tbills@cse.unl.edu (Trent Bills) writes:
|> In article <AHANSFOR.92Dec18071830@bigwpi.wpi.edu>, ahansfor@bigwpi.wpi.edu (Andrew L. Hansford) writes:
|> |> >>>>> On 18 Dec 92 00:56:48 GMT, idr@rigel.cs.pdx.edu (Ian D Romanick) said:
|> |> 
|> |> idr> Article-I.D.: pdxgate.6587
|> |> 
|> |> idr> In article <Bz8FD1.Dxt@ns1.nodak.edu> dewald@plains.NoDak.edu
|> |> idr> (Eric Dewald) writes:
|> |> >What are the advantages of CISC and RISC?
|> |> 
|> |> idr> Well, since RISC is a more basic instruction set, it is MUCH
|> |> idr> easier for a compiler to generate good code for it.
|> |> 
|> |> You are joking right?  The compiler and even assemblers are the
|> |> elements that got much more complicated.  Dependency avoidance, delay
|> |> slot scheduling...easy?
|> |> 
|> 
|> No.  He is not joking.  Have you ever written a compiler?  Compiler
|> problems such as register allocation are MUCH more difficult that
|> avoiding data hazzards and filling delay slots.

Then, why produce many compilers on SPARC processsors only intermediate
c-code? It may be simplier to write a compiler on RISC architecture,
but it is really hard to write an efficient one.


|> |> idr> It also makes it so
|> |> idr> that the instructions themselves are smaller and can be fetched
|> |> idr> and decoded quicker.
|> |> 
|> |> The instructions are generally the same format for all instructions
|> |> (or the processor supports very few formats) that makes them easier to
|> |> decode.  THEY ARE NOT SMALLER.
|> |> 
|> |> -- Andrew Hansford
|> |>    ahansfor@wpi.wpi.edu
|> 
|> In many cases, RISC instructions are smaller than CISC instructions.
|> Consider an add instruction in a CISC chip.  The source operands could
|> both be some place in memory.  Depending on the addressing mode used,
|> both source operands could take up 4 bytes or more each.  RISC
|> instructions are usually a fixed size (32 or 64 bits) which is obviously
|> smaller than the above CISC example.
|> 
|>  - Trent Bills

Indeed, there is not so much difference in total code size. But RISC
programs are bigger:

GNU Emacs  18.57.1 on different platforms:

DEC,  MIPS          983040 Bytes    (RISC)
Sun4, SPARC         937984 Bytes    (RISC)

Sun3, 68020         860160 Bytes    (CISC)
DEC,  Vax           720896 Bytes    (complex CISC)

- Wolfgang Meisl





Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.misc
From: wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Markus Wild)
Subject: Re: AmigaDOS Curses(3X) library, anyone?
Organization: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, CH
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 23:28:43 GMT

In article <BzEr7n.Bv7@gabriel.keele.ac.uk> u2d92@seq1.keele.ac.uk (MJ Gumbley) writes:
>Hello folks, does anyone know of a decent, working Curses library for
>the Amiga? (You know, the UNIX screen / windowing library)

I included the BSD curses and termcap libraries into the gcc222 distribution.

>Hopefully, something that will work with KickStart/AmigaDos 2.04 and SAS C
>5.01 (I think that's the compiler version) would be ideal.

It does work with 2.04, but unless SAS has learned about the existance of
<sys/termios.h> etc. I really doubt you'd get it running without major
headaches.. ;-)) Besides, if the thing should later work under Unix, I guess
gcc would be a clever choice anyway;-)) (and if it proves that it doesn't
fit your requirements, well, you didn't pay anything for it, nothing lost!)

-Markus
-- 
Markus M. Wild    -  wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch  |  wild@amiga.physik.unizh.ch 
Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by spontaneously moving
from where you left them to where you can't find them.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
From: bandy@netnews.jhuapl.edu (Mike Bandy)
Subject: Re: Does opening libraries require a fixed varname?
Organization: JHU/Applied Physics Laboratory
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 18:21:10 GMT

shulick@navajo.ucs.indiana.edu (Sam Hulick) writes:


>If I wanted, for instance, to open intuition.library, does the line
>*HAVE* to be:

>IntuitionBase = OpenLibr.......

>Can it be something like "IBase = OpenLibrary(.." or "blech = Open..."
>In other words, does it matter what you call the variable?
>GadToolsBase, ExecBase, GfxBase, etc.

Yes it matters.  Name is *exactly* like you see it described in the texts.

I tried the following - it took me several hours to figure out why my
A3000 kept crashing!

LONG init()
{
static APTR IntuitionBase;		/* *** WRONG *** */
   IntuitionBase = OpenLibr....
}

The return value is important and must be stored in a *global* variable
for reference by the stubs (see other replies for a description of the
AmigaDOS library mechanism).  No compile or run time error message results
in calling a routine with an unitialized or undefined base variable - your
Amiga just crashes.

-- 

	Mike Bandy
	bandy@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu
	Johns Hopkins University / Applied Physics Lab
From: tlbechar@thunder.LakeheadU.Ca (Timothy Lee Bechard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Cobol
	I'm still looking for a Cobol compiler for the amiga / ANY type of
Date: 20 Dec 1992 00:49:22 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: Lakehead University; Thunder Bay, Ont

IBM source code in "C" I would be mighty greatful 'to get it (and do a port 
if I have to)....

	Thanx...
From: paulk@terapin.com (Paul Kienitz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: How to Mungwall ?
Date: 11 Dec 92 20:07:51 PST
Organization: BBS

> As I remember, mungwall writes direktly to the ports, or something
> similar, without using any device.  Catch your output with sushi.
 
Hey Mike Sinz or whoever:
 
Adding file redirection to Enforcer was the best possible improvement
it could have had, for me.  I find it an order of magnitude more
useful now, now that I can mostly just send it to a /AUTO window, and
if desired easily capture the entire output in a file (if there's no
crash).
 
When is MungWall going to have a similar option?  Sushi would be a
poor substitute at best, even if I could find a copy, which I haven't
even though I've found various Enforcer versions all over the place.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer