HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: What knockers!  Crreak. Woman. Sheesh.
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 13:15:06 GMT

In article <18kf7uINNpap@agate.berkeley.edu> jbecker@ocf.berkeley.edu (Jane Becker) writes:
>In article <1992Sep7.025433.429@peponi.wcc.govt.nz> parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz writes:
>>Help me out here, guys (and girls).
>>
>>I've had guys stick their elbows out purposely to brush my tits as I walk past. 
>>How can they possibly get off on elbow contact?  The last I heard the elbow was
>>not an erogenous zone and it's rather painful to collide with one with your
>>spongy bits!
>>
>>
>>
>>Rachel
>
>Yes, guys do this to me occasionally too (in fact someone did it earlier
>today...).  Although I've never been elbowed hard enough to consider
>it painful, it is really annoying.  It's not the fact that they are
>brushing against me that is bothersome: if a guy is such a loser that
>elbow contact with by tits is a big thrill, then he's welcome to it.
>What irritates me is that these guys do it so "accidentally."  Come on!
>Who do you think you're fooling?  I hate that kind of pretense.  I think 
>I'd almost prefer they just plant a hand on my breast and squeeze...
>it would undoubtably be more enjoyable for the both of us... of course
>they run a substantial risk of getting slapped though!  Seriously guys,
>what are you thinking when you do this?  Enquiring minds (well, mind, at
>least) want to know!
>
>-Jane
 
I find it hard to believe that every day some drooling, holes in their pockets
pee wee hermans spend their day holding doors for women in the hopes
of getting 2 seconds of pressure. Sounds like paranoia or wishfull thinking.
Now women on the other hand. Perverts the whole lot of em. Imagine if you
will ex cub scout/alterboy minding his own business fighting the royal
fight when suddenly two hands with nails the size of... of.... Manhatten
clamp down on your(tee hee) derrier. Well I think we can all say SENSITIVE.
 
By the way.
 
Researchers scanning photos looking for Noahs Ark have discovered what
appears to be a gathering of abomidable snowmen or women. It appears
to number about ten specimens. They also appear to be playing basketball
in pumps. Looks like a pump, feels like a sneaker.
 

 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: chemistry / love at first sight : fact or fiction?
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 18:09:48 GMT

In article <ewillims.716139856@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>In <1992Sep10.073942.21182@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>
>
>>Trygve   (Of course the obvious conclusion one can draw from this is
>>          simply that the only reason to date me is the brief sensation
>>          that there's a challenge in doing so.) 
>
>	You mean we'd only get brief sensations out of it, Trygve????
>	Ahhhh!  Too bad!  How disappointing!;>

Well, I suppose that all would depend on whether or not you were able to
persuade me to take off my briefs. 

Trygve   (Normally it's just the sensation of uncertainty that's brief--
          there are many others that last much longer.) 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: misrael@csi.uottawa.ca (Mark Israel)
Subject: Re: Appeal to Net.Wisdom
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, University of Ottawa
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 20:45:05 GMT

In article <TyXZqB2w165w@wildrose.infoserv.com>, rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink) writes:

> How about a straight answer? "I'm not interested in spending any time
> with you.  Sorry.  Please don't call me any more.  Goodbye." And hang up
> the phone.  No need for anger, no need for explanation, just a clear 
> *direct* statement of what you want. [...]
>
> It's certainly the way I'd prefer to be treated, a simple no is much
> more effective than any amount of waffling.

   I second that.

misrael@csi.uottawa.ca			Mark Israel
Sunbeams brightly play, where Fancy's fair pavilion once is pight.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: General topic to break the monotony
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 8 Sep 92 14:37:38 GMT

In article <flrn61f@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
>This might sound cruel but....
>In Illinois yesterday, a plane carrying skydivers crashed.
>My only question is, why didn't they jump out?

From what I heard, the plane crashed shortly after takeoff, so they would
have had insufficient altitude to bail out.

Also, there are "failure modes" in aircraft that would make it extremely
difficult for passengers to exit the aircraft.  Spins, for example.

Incidentally, contrary to some popular beliefs, pilots/passengers in
small airplanes (typically) do not wear parachutes.  Part of getting
a pilot's licence involves the training to land in fields or other
random open spaces.  Of course, shortly after takeoff, your options
are severely limited.

For the non-pilots out there who now must be thinking "wow, aviation is
dangerous", allow me to make an observation:  practically every aviation
occurrance becomes front-page news (including ones where nobody is hurt
and the aircraft lands safely).  Now imagine the same treatment for
automobiles.

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
From: eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Info about gift boxes: LDR
Date: 5 Sep 92 19:36:11 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

RSA@SSCVAX.CIS.MCMASTER.CA writes:
>About this LDR. One person suggested that it is a good idea
>to send a gift box with lots of little things. 
>What kind of little things one should include in a box like that?
>Can I have a few suggestions?

Well, someone I really like sends "care packages" to many of her friends.
It all depends. I know she has sent candy/chocolate to some of her friends.
This summer, she baked me about 2.5 dozen sugar cookies (absolutely
delicious). (In retaliation, I made her some brownies -- microwaveable,
but she liked them.) She also made me a Duke T-shirt (so I sent her three
that I didn't make). You can do audio tapes, a booklet filled with
"inspirational messages" or pictures (photos or drawn), etc. Just send
some stuff you are sure the other person would love to get... which could
be just about anything; I know I enjoy getting packages in the mail.


-- 
Emil Thomas Chuck (Duke BME '93)		eyc@acpub.duke.edu
I'm too busy for my class, too busy for my clubs, too busy for my work.
I'm too busy for my mail, too busy for my news, too busy for my life.
I'm too busy for this .sig. 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Blind dates scare me!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 13:52:34 GMT

In article <1992Sep13.142731.3611@wvnvms.wvnet.edu> un030025@wvnvms.wvnet.edu writes:
>
>	I got a point that I must make on this blind dating thing. I think that
>it sucks! Every girl that I have ever met on a blind date has been psycho. Why
>do we do this? If anyone know, let me know.
>	The last one that I went on this summer was the worst. A girl named
>Becky pulled a knife on me. That really can spoil an evening. I was just
>driving along when I felt a knife on my arm. Scared the s#$t out of me! Also
>she brought M-80's, potatos, a smaller knife, and a cammera.

 I'm in love with a girl that un030025@wvn is talking about. I'm
in love with a girl that I can't live without.
 
 Anybody wanna go carp fishin?
 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
From: jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: chemistry / love at first sight : fact or fiction?
Date: 9 Sep 92 16:38:58 GMT
	<1992Sep7.022243.29268@peponi.wcc.govt.nz>
	<1992Sep9.040523.8889@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
	<ewillims.716050913@unix1.tcd.ie>
Organization: Bear, Stearns & Co. - FAST
In-reply-to: ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie's message of 9 Sep 92 15:01:53 GMT


In article <ewillims.716050913@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:

   Well, do you guys feel the same way?  Do you hate it if the woman makes
   it too obvious that she can't live without you?  Actually, I'm sure you
   probably do...I have heard men complain before about "clingy" women!

It seems to me that in an ideal relationship each partner gives 100% -- that
is, each partner gives all that they can to the relationship.  The situation
where one partner is giving less than the other, or where one partner is
"receiving" the relationship, seems to me to be unstable.  Eventually the
other partner will be asked to give more than he/she possibly can.  

The "can't live without you" scenario which you describe seems to fit this
giving/taking model.  I think that such a relationship it not very likely to
succeed.  One partner cannot support the whole relationship.  Both have to
give for it to last.

Perhaps this ties in a bit with the want/need thread?

					Spidey!!!


--
 /\ \  / /\  Josh Diamond                              		   jmd@bear.com
//\\ .. //\\ AKA Spidey!!!                        ...!ctr.columbia.edu!ursa!jmd
//\((  ))/\\
/  < `' >  \          Beauty is the purgation of superfluities. -- Michelangelo
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: c71@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (David N)
Subject: Re: Desperation (was Re: Commitment--The C
Reply-To: c71@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
Organization: University of Heidelberg, Germany
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 10:28:45 GMT

In article 716025009@unix1.tcd.ie, ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>In <1992Sep9.071115.446@dmpe.csiro.au> solnorda@dmpe.csiro.au (Chris Solnordal) writes:
>
>>ewilliams.71545301@unix1.tcd.ie writes:
>
>>>	Absolutely!  Yet another facet of the "the minute you've got an
>>>SO, you get more passes from other girls/guys than you've ever had before
>>>in your life" syndrome.  To coin a popular phrase, it's "strange but true".
>>>Personally, I think it is because you are glowing with happiness and 
>>>that warmth surrounding you attracts others too.  A friend of mine insists
>>>that it is because you are releasing more pheronomes (sp?) [sexual hormones
>>>that are smelt subliminally by others].  It could be a combination of both.
>
>>A friend of mine insists that it's because when you're going out with
>>someone, there's a much greater chance that you've just had sex :-)  This 
>>then attracts potential partners in a big way - especially if it was quite
>>recent !!
>
>>Don't know how true it is, but it sounds reasonable to me :-)
>
>
>	Well, this would further support the theory about the sexual
>hormones (pheronomes).  Presumably, you would be releasing them in
>abundance if you have just had sex and therefore would attract others
>to the smell without them realising why.  Moose do it!  Why do you 
>think theyr put musk in perfumes and aftershaves! ;>
> 
>    ____________________________________________________________________
>    |   Emma Williams            | Folk sover ellers ikke godt op      |
>    |   ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie    | ad en sultan tiger!                 |
>    |				 |    Steen og Stoffer :->             |
>    |____________________________|_____________________________________|
>
>>Chris


AHA! But Different animals have different pheromones! Does Yves Saint Laurent like
moose-sex? Or could there be a flaw in the theory?

David
(As a true Swede, I enjoy eating moose, but it stays at that.)

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com (PuterDude)
Subject: Twin Towers of Tro{yi}
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Keywords: Latin and Greek
Organization: Organized? Just look at my desk!
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 21:05:33 GMT

In article <72042@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) treks...

>johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>
>>Yea, but somehow Steph's topless towers and hipbones seem a little more
>>interesting that the towers of Troy.  Although Steph might prefer Troy's
>>topless tower.  Hey, there's something for everybody.
>
>No thanks. Counselor Troi's towers may be awesome but I prefer my victims
>to be seasoned with intelligence.

Sorry. T'Pau is dead.

	(Hope this wasn't TOO cerebral or trekkish!)

-- 
Puter	puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com	.sig by Generic Labels
(Put irritating title here)		(Put phone # here.)
(Put obnoxious quote here. Please make it as long as possible.)
From: taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Cradle Robbin?
Date: 10 Sep 92 09:30:37 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki, Finland

In <lasi5hINN8r4@news.bbn.com> dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
><nose in air, snotty sniff>  I will ignore any scandalous and unfounded 
>accusations, thank you very much.  My sweetheart is 26.

He was born in 1966?  1966 was a very good year. :)

Juha

-- 
Juha Taina | taina@cs.helsinki.fi | Phone: +358-0-708-4247
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Subject: Re: hello?
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 92 04:26:17 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <1992Sep11.163342.3600@wvnvms.wvnet.edu> un030025@wvnvms.wvnet.edu writes:
>Hello there everyone. Just out of curiosity, where are ya all writing from? I'm
>here at West Virginia University. I gotta admit that some of these messages are
>pretty funny. Just out meating people.
>
>Later.

Hi, Jeffrey.  Glad to see you.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

IRWTFM -- and that ain't fun
From: jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: hello?
Date: 15 Sep 92 00:54:50 GMT
Organization: Bear, Stearns & Co. - FAST
In-reply-to: un030025@wvnvms.wvnet.edu's message of 12 Sep 92 00:32:10 GMT


In article <1992Sep11.163342.3600@wvnvms.wvnet.edu> un030025@wvnvms.wvnet.edu writes:

   Hello there everyone. Just out of curiosity, where are ya all writing from? I'm
   here at West Virginia University. I gotta admit that some of these messages are
   pretty funny. Just out meating people.

Welcome -- glad you're enjoying yourself!

"Just out meating people." -- I guess you really ARE enjoying
yourself...  I never thought of using "meat" as a verb before...
:-) :-) 



--
 /\ \  / /\  Josh Diamond                              		   jmd@bear.com
//\\ .. //\\ AKA Spidey!!!                        ...!ctr.columbia.edu!ursa!jmd
//\((  ))/\\
/  < `' >  \          Beauty is the purgation of superfluities. -- Michelangelo
From: aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Las Vegas Revisited
Date: 15 Sep 92 12:29:21 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <1942upINNh9q@agate.berkeley.edu> epg@nature.Berkeley.EDU (little 'e' string) writes:
>
>Just me,
>little 'e'
>
>(who has obviously lost all her powers of attraction since she found a
> wonderful SO) (well, *most* of her powers :)

Yeah, you look like you've been beaten with an ugly stick.


Mooommmmmyyyyy!  Do I *haveta* put in the smileys?!?!?!?!?!
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

IRWTFM -- and that ain't fun
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: leg shaving
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 22:23:32 GMT

In article <1992Sep11.031255.11724@samba.oit.unc.edu> Bathsheba.Grossman@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Bathsheba Grossman) writes:
>
>Trygve I'm ROTFL - you win, uncle, I submit.  From now on I'll run
>the Turbo Mouse with the body part of your choosing.

ROTFL?  "Right On The Flight Leaving"?  Anything I should do to prepare
appropriate accomodations?

Trygve   (Hmmmm...hard to decide on just one body part without doing lots
          of testing first.)

(Nyx seems to be working again--hopefully this situation will continue.) 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll)
Subject: Re: Wolf Park? (was Re: Desperation)
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 14:52:50 GMT

	At one time, it was legal to own wolves in Waterloo, and
my shorter brother used to play with a pack of wolves (The very same
ones whose presence led to Waterloo's exotic pets prohibition, which
forbids owning wolves, and also Blue Whales. I love small town governments).
He  never described the wolves as 'cute'. He did mention they are 
very impressive (They were about his mass) and have unfortunate
breath (Also, they don't share domestic pooches servility towards
humans, so hasseling the carnivores is just tad dangerous, since 
humans are soft and chewy :).

							James Nicoll	
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: BOINK! BalloonBoink, Coming soon!
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 06:11:01 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <j#tnt#j.aahz@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius) writes:
>In article <1992Sep9.220446.25375@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
>>>Alright, who brought the cow?  Well, he can stay if he'll Just Sit.
>>That's Bull Sit, sir!
>What is the sound of Sit happening?

Mu!
r.
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Flirting.
Date: 11 Sep 92 23:22:58 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <lb24chINNme4@news.bbn.com> ahsiung@labs-n.bbn.com (Anita Hsiung) writes:
 
|When I'm working with a client and we both know he's married (that
|makes him "safe"), it's fun to flirt, when we both know the rules.
|For instance, if I ask him (serious), do you need us tomorrow, he may
|think and say (grin) , yes, I _want_ you tomorrow.  I then respond
|with something like (surprise), oh, in front of all these people?  He
|says (shrug), yeah, they may learn something.  I say (friendly smile),
|right, we're just one big happy family.

Good example of flirting.  I always see flirting as something that you
do with someone that "is safe".

|I don't flirt with someone I like.

Right.  You (not you specifically) seduce someone you like.

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira     | Auspex Systems | "Auspex does not share my opinions.  |
| johnf@auspex.com | Santa Clara CA |  So Why am I still working here?"    |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: gclapp@javelin.sim.es.com (Glenn Clapp)
Subject: Re: Tallllll women....
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 23:32:10 GMT

In article <4205@moscom.UUCP> wjb@moscom.com writes:
>Glenn Clapp (gclapp@javelin.sim.es.com) wrote:
>: In article <Bu7H2I.CKF@tik.vtt.fi> pekka@tmt.tele.fi (Pekka Ahonen) writes:
>: >There are also tall men (and women!) in Finland. I think that I'm
>: >about the average height (or perhaps a bit short) 183 cm.
>: >
>: Any of them have US visas?
>
>What, American Express and Mastercard aren't good enough for you?

Depends on the "limits."

G.


-- 
=============================================================================
= Glenn Clapp                          |  gclapp@thunder.sim.es.com         =
= Evans and Sutherland Computer Corp.  |  My opinions are my own, but then  =
= Salt Lake City, Utah  (801) 582-5847 |  that's my opinion.                =
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: Various ramblings...
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 03:00:58 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <5118@news.duke.edu> diamond@acpub.duke.edu (Elizabeth Abrams) writes:

>Hee hee.  Good point.  This reminds me a little bit of that fantastic 
>marketing ploy, "extra large" condoms.  Not everyone buys them, but I 
>bet lots of people *claim* to buy them.

No, lots of people buy them, but only when they think someone is looking.
Then they go home alone and make water balloons out of them.

"No, don't trouble yourself - the "Large" are just fine."  :-)

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Across the evening sky, all the birds are leaving
But how can they know it's time for them to go?		- Sandy Denny
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Boston Baby Boink report
Date: 15 Sep 92 20:17:20 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Sep15.171222.21663@linus.mitre.org> wtr@mitre.org (Bill Ralston) writes:
>
>There's really nothing all that exciting to hear about James, just the usual 
>stuff with raw fish, baby, face painting, hot chili oil, bananas, etc.  I 
>never saw any evidence of pickles,  figurative or otherwise.  

Perhaps you just weren't looking in the right places.  Wait a minute, weren't
you the one the was checking out the skirt on the cute blonde?

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira     | Auspex Systems | "Auspex does not share my opinions.  |
| johnf@auspex.com | Santa Clara CA |  So Why am I still working here?"    |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: Too Much of Anything is ...
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 16:44:40 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1992Sep3.142709.25575@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:

>But take the scenario a step further.  You're IN that situation.  You've
>gotten yourself into this monagamous commitment with someone and now
>you find that their life revolves around sex.

>I have to wonder about people who'd be happy in that situation, as opposed
>to those who *think* they'd be happy in that situation.

Coppedf rom an old Rolf Harris routine:

Dear Ann Landers,

	I am in terrible trouble because my husband appears to love me
too much.  He loves me in the morning, during morning tea break, before
and after lunch, in the afternoon, before and after the evening meal,
while I am watching television and while I am polishing the floors.  My
problem is, what am I to do about it?

	PS, please excuse the jerky handwriting ...

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Across the evening sky, all the birds are leaving
But how can they know it's time for them to go?		- Sandy Denny
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: pekka@tmt.tele.fi (Pekka Ahonen)
Subject: Re: Cooking for 1!
Organization: PTT Finland, Telematics
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 11:04:06 GMT

In article <ewillims.715604056@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>
>	Actually, it's a pity you don't get the British TV channel
>called BBC1 as there is a chef there called Floyd who travels all
>over France and Spain cooking dishes in the rural areas.  He is 
>absolutely hilarious!  He is always slugging wine and talking to
>Bruce, the cameraman, and is often quite the better for the wine
>by the end of the programme! (Euphemistically speaking!:)
> 

Here in Finland we are able to watch BBC1 through cable or satellite,
but the program you refer to is also aired on Finnish national TV and
it sure is a hilarious show and even tho' I never cook I just love to
watch Floyd "trying" to cook with Spanish or French people who don't
understand any english (and Floyd don't understand spanish or french
:-). 

Brandon