HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Return-Path: <@VM.TEMPLE.EDU:CREWSD@UNCG.BITNET>
Organization: University of NC at Greensboro
X-Envelope-to: SPORTPSY@TEMPLEVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"SPORTPSY@TEMPLEVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sportpsy
Date:         Tue, 29 Dec 1992 10:01:24 -0500
From:         CREWSD@UNCG.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Division 47 Name Change ??

     Each year Division 47:  Exercise and Sport Psychology, of the APA
selects an outstanding doctoral dissertation.  The dissertations submitted
are judged by experts in the field.  Criteria include the quality of the
research and its contribution to science and practice.
     Interested applicants for the 1992 Dissertation Award must submit an
abstract of 1500 words or less and a letter of support from their advisor.
The advisor is also asked to confirm the successful awarding of the degree.
The abstract must include an introduction with referral to relevant
literature; a clear description of the study design, methodology, and
analysis; an explanation of the findings; and the relevance of the findings
to science and practice.
     To apply, please submit the abstract and letter of support to Dr. Debbie
Crews by February 28, 1993.
                       Dr. Debbie Crews
                       Dept. of Exercise and Sport Science
                       Univ. of North Carolina at Greensboro
                       Greensboro, NC   27412-5001
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <V5289E@VM.TEMPLE.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sportpsy
Date:         Tue, 22 Dec 1992 15:22:02 EST
From:         Michael Sachs <V5289E@TEMPLEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Happy Holidays!

     This is your devoted List Coordinator with his end of the year holiday
message.  First, a sincere thank you to all members of SPORTPSY for joining
(membership is at 308) and for participating.  I've enjoyed the questions,
the answers, the interactions, and the good spirits of our communications.

     Second, with Temple's holiday schedule and my schedule (I'll be away
for a week doing some personal case study work on adaptation of the body
to running in a warmer climate) I won't be available to do any deletions
(unsubscribing) or setting folks to nomail until January 4th.  The system
should still be operating, though, if you want to send mail to SPORTPSY.
I don't think the computer will be on vacation even if the computer
operators will.

     Finally, a wish for a very happy and healthy holiday season and New
Year to all of you.  Thanks for your support and looking forward to
a great 1993 for SPORTPSY and for all of you the best in all your
endeavors for the coming year.

    Best wishes, Michael Sachs, Temple University, List Coordinator
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@VM.TEMPLE.EDU:STEPHEN@SED.BITNET>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sportpsy
Date:         Tue, 22 Dec 1992 18:52:20 EST
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
From:         "STEPHEN@SED" <STEPHEN@SED.BITNET>
Subject:      Midwest Sport and Exercise Psychology Symposium

Hello again Michael,
     I just wanted to thank you for the fine job you have done on this network
and to let you know that we here in the frigid northeast will be with you in
spirit during your studies of the body's ability to acclimate to a warmer
climate.
     I look forward to a year full of exercise related interchange during 1993
and with you at the helm of our electronic spider web it should be a fruitful
one. Again let me wish the very best to you and yours and enjoy all there is
in life in good health.
                          YOUR FRIENDS IN THE GREAT NORTHEAST,
                              RICHARD AND STEPHEN WARENCHAK
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@VM.TEMPLE.EDU,@pucc.Princeton.EDU:danganan@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sportpsy
Date:         Thu, 24 Dec 1992 16:06:52 EST
From:         "E. Danganan" <danganan@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL>
Subject: Re: Happy Holidays!

I aggree with vigor ...
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <V5289E@VM.TEMPLE.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sportpsy
Date:         Tue, 22 Dec 1992 15:16:40 EST
From:         Michael Sachs <V5289E@TEMPLEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Midwest Sport and Exercise Psychology Symposium

     Miami University's Department of Physical Education, Health, and Sport
Studies will sponsor the Third Annual Midwest Sport and Exercise Psychology
Symposium (MSEPS) on Saturday, February 6, 1993.  The purpose of the
symposium is to allow students and faculty a forum for the discussion of
knowledge and ideas about sport and exercise psychology.  The emphasis will
be on students' presentation of proposed research annd research in progress.

     Housing may be available, registration fee is quite low ($17) - this
is a good symposium and worth attending if you can make it.  If you want
more information, including info on submitting an abstract, contact Susan
Walter at SWALTER@MIAMIU or call her at (513) 529-6085.

     One question, though - is Ohio really in the Midwest?

     Sincerely, Michael Sachs, Temple University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vmxa-l
Date:         Wed, 23 Dec 1992 10:41:57 EST
From:         CCRS@BUACCA.BITNET
Subject:      Re: VMNET.

VMCF RC=5 indicates that VMNET is "not available", as in not VMCF-
functional.  Do you get response from SMSGs to VMNET (another form of
VMCF)?  Anything in the VMNET console log?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Princeton University, Network Systems, Class. 56
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vmxa-l
Date:         Mon, 28 Dec 1992 10:49:05 -0500
From:         gettes@PRINCETON.EDU
Subject:      Re: VMNET.
Comments: To: Discussion of BITNET II <BITNET-2@TCSVM.BITNET>
              22 Dec 92 15:02:44 -0700. <9212222204.AA05300@Princeton.EDU>

On Tue, 22 Dec 92 15:02:44 -0700 khaam@asuacad.bitnet said:
> We are experiencing lines drop problem in VMNET 1.1 and RSCS v3.1 in the last
>   two weeks, and don't know where the problem lies.
> Our TCPIP v2r2 got error 'VMCF rc=5' with VMNET, and forced it off constantly.
> We have a BTI box connected to a 3084 running VM/XA/SP r2.1.
> Does anybody experienced this problem before, and could give us some help?
> Thanks in advance.

FYI... this problem has been resolved. The problem was due to a bad
configuration in the PROFILE TCPIP which defined VMNET has having
reserved UDP port 175. Therefore, TCPIP would force and autolog VMNET
every five minutes because VMNET uses TCP port 175 and not UDP port 175.

/mrg
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vmxa-l
Date:         Wed, 23 Dec 1992 09:15:00 CST
From:         Bill Hunter <BHUNTER@UA1VM.UA.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Querying System TDISK Space
Comments: To: VM/XA Discussion List <VMXA-L@UGA.BITNET>,
          Phil Matthei <sy0209@nyshescv.BITNET>

On Tue, 22 Dec 1992 16:55:14 -0500 Phil Matthei said:
>    Is there a way, in XA, for general users to find out how much TDISK
>space is currently available on the system?  On HPO, users could enter
>Q TDSK, and they could see what was there.  On XA, Q TDSK is not available
>to general users any more, and the command does not display the same info
>as before.  Other possibilities, such as Q ALLOC are also not available
>to general users.  We would like to be able to query the available TDISK
>for use in a general-purpose EXEC.
>
>Phil Matthei
>New York Higher Education Services Corporation

Hmmm, On our HPO5 system 'CP Q TDISK' was NOT a class "G" command, it was
class "B".  We did do a local mod to HPO5 that changed it to class "G".
This was before I tried to figure out 'command class overrides'.

On XA and ESA we have an exec call 'QTD' that sends a 'q tdisk' to PROP
and PROP has its routing table configured so that it'll allow a 'q tdisk'
from anybody.  Again I suppose all this could be done using the OVERRIDE
command and making 'q tdisk' a class "G" command...

Bill Hunter, The U. of Alabama
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Envelope-to: VMXA-L@UGA.BITNET
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vmxa-l
Date:         Tue, 22 Dec 1992 15:02:44 -0700
From:         Steve Bui <KHAAM@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Subject:      VMNET.
Comments: To: VMXA-L@UGA.BITNET, BITNET-2@TCSVM.BITNET

We are experiencing lines drop problem in VMNET 1.1 and RSCS v3.1 in the last
  two weeks, and don't know where the problem lies.
Our TCPIP v2r2 got error 'VMCF rc=5' with VMNET, and forced it off constantly.
We have a BTI box connected to a 3084 running VM/XA/SP r2.1.
Does anybody experienced this problem before, and could give us some help?
Thanks in advance.

--- Steve Bui, Systems Support
--- ASU Computer Center dept.
--- ODP 0101 / ECA-355 / (602) 965-3070
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vmxa-l
Date:         Tue, 22 Dec 1992 16:55:14 -0500
From:         Phil Matthei <SY0209@NYSHESCV.BITNET>
Subject:      Querying System TDISK Space

    Is there a way, in XA, for general users to find out how much TDISK
space is currently available on the system?  On HPO, users could enter
Q TDSK, and they could see what was there.  On XA, Q TDSK is not available
to general users any more, and the command does not display the same info
as before.  Other possibilities, such as Q ALLOC are also not available
to general users.  We would like to be able to query the available TDISK
for use in a general-purpose EXEC.

Phil Matthei
New York Higher Education Services Corporation
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Envelope-to: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu
X-VMS-To: IN%"POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Sat, 2 Jan 1993 13:22:00 AST
From:         Ramon <R_ALEMAN@UPR1.UPR.CLU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: what makes a good parent?
Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu

> Any disadvantages of growing up in a gay
>family are mostly due to outside factors (homophobia, ect.)

        Nonetheless, the outside factors are very real, have quite a
negative effect on rearing a child, and unfortunately, will be present for
quite some time...

   - Ramon
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: politics@ohstvma.bitnet
X-VMS-To: IN%"politics@ohstvma.bitnet"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Thu, 24 Dec 1992 11:54:00 EST
From:         waiting for the wolves <SWEDE@DRYCAS.BITNET>
Subject:      left-right origin revisited
Comments: To: politics@ohstvma.bitnet

Daniel:
>The terms "right wing" and "left wing" come from a time when facists and
>communists were two extremes on a certai national government.  In the
>legislative house, the facists sat on the far right of the room, the communists
>on the far left.  Other factions placed themselves inbetween these two extremes
>depending on how close they were to one or the other.

Bzzzzzt!  But thanks for playing...

As I posted previously, the left wing and right wing terms originate in the
French Revolution, "...when the partisans of the revolution were seated on
the left side of the national assembly and the proponents of the ancien
regime' on the right.  As such, they have retained a generic meaning over the
centuries, although their specific meaning has changed with each new political
era."

(source: "Looking left and right: the evolution of political direction", John
Judis, 'In These Times', June 12-25, 1991, pp. 12-13.)

Gary W. Olson                   "Santa'll cut ya, man!  Santa's a blade man!"
SWEDE@DRYCAS.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU     -Crow, MST3K presentation of
SWEDE@DRYCAS.BITNET               'Santa Claus Conquers the Martians'
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Tue, 29 Dec 1992 10:31:31 PST
From:         Jonathan Fisher <jfisher@NETXWEST.COM>
Subject:      Re: well, pardon me! version 1
Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu

> >The Sunday Washington Post was full of commentary on the pardons, mostly
 negati
> >ve.  One pundit ascribed it to Bush's trying to curry favor with the
 conservati
> >ves of the GOP.  An interesting legal point is the pardons potentially
 increase
> >Bush's vulnerability as Weinberger et al cannot plead the Fifth Amendment in
 re
> >fusing to answer questions now that they're pardoned.
> >Uncle Ernie
>
> Hah! I made that interesting point three weeks ago. Thank you, thank you.
>
> I saw William Safire's column about the pardons today. He had this
> interesting angle.
>
> White House Counsel Boyden Grey essentially got the pardons for Cap & Co.
> He also effectively prevented a special prosecutor appointment for
> Iraqgate. Yet, he insisted on a special prosecutor for investigating
> the GOP inspection of Clinton's records. Why? Did he think the
> prying into Clinton's past was more important?
It was my impression that the law specifically states that when a "senior"
member of the White House Staff is involved, a special prosecutor HAS to
be named.  IMO, Barr had no choice.  And I'll bet that he tried to find
every loophole possible!
>
> Safire speculates that Grey was largely motivated by hatred for,
> and rivalry with, James Baker. Baker alone stood to be embarassed
> by the exposing the invasion of Clinton's privacy. In the other
> two cases, Grey was trying to cover the president's butt.
hmm. Interesting.  However, I believe that it is the Attorney General
who decides to appoint (or more accurately since the law is now history,
decided to appoint), and therefore unless Barr and Grey are good buddies,
(not impossible to imagine), Barr decided to do this on his own and
(referencing my above paragraph) followed the law.
>
> Jamie
>
Jonathan
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Wed, 30 Dec 1992 08:50:00 PST
From:         Jonathan Fisher <jfisher@NETXWEST.COM>
Subject:      Re: nambla
Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu

> Jonathan:
>
> >Please explain to me how one could have sex with children but
> >not be molesting them.
>
> I never said anything about having sex with children. I said
> 'loving them', meaning being attracted to them.
>
> Sam.
>

Sam,
Below is the part that you decided to cut.  It is pretty obvious to
me why you decided to cut it, but maybe you can explain it.

----- Begin Included Message -----
> I think it's unfair to mention NAMBLA in a company of unsavory groups.
> I believe that there is nothing wrong about loving children (that's
> all NAMBLA is about). It is wrong to molest children, but not to love
> them, even sexually. NAMBLA is created as a support group for people
> who are attracted to children. It is not a cabal of child molesters.
>
> Sam.
>
I don't know about the rest of you, but this whole paragraph is a
mass of contradictions to me.  Please explain to me how one could
have sex with children but not be molesting them.

Jonathan


----- End Included Message -----

If you'll note the third sentence, you say specifically that you don`t
find anything wrong with having sex with children.  Now do you wish to
deny your statement again?

Jonathan
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Tue, 22 Dec 1992 22:42:12 EST
From:         Doctor Pizz <jdt10@CUNIXB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Subject:      re:re: freedom of speech
Comments: To: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu>

Fred,

I think everyone should be allowed equal freedom of speech.  Clearly,
if gay activists wanted to demonstrate OUTSIDE the church, they have as
much right as the pro-life forces do to demonstrate OUTSIDE an abortion
clinic.  Once they start entering the premises of the church or clinic,
they should be expected to follow the rules of the property owners.
The pro-life people shouldn't enter a clinic to disrupt an abortion,
and the gay rights folks shouldn't enter the cathedral and disrupt the
church services.  The whole point of my argument is that you seemed to
be supporting the right of Howard Stern to have free speech, but not
the pro-life crowd.  You seemed to state that it was wrong for the
pro-lifers to vociferously "harass" the women going to the clinic, yet
you approve of Howard Stern harassing people in his audience.  It seems
that one must be consistent, and allow everyone full freedom of speech,
rather than get bogged down in technicalities and cases where one group
or another deems speech to be inappropriaate.  Just tell me how you
feel about the pro-life groups outside the abortion clinics.  Clearly
you must be consistent with your belief that it would be okay for a
putative group to protest outside a cathedral...  Besides, just as
people can turn off Howard Stern, they can go home, avoid the aabortion
clinic, and have the baby, or even come back aanother day to have the
abortion.  Further, in most places there are mutliple plaaces one could
go.  Finally, if a woman was desperate for an abortion and really
believed it was right, the pro-life people shouldn't be able to chnge
her mind, and she could then just walk right through...

Doctor Pizz
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Computer Science Department,  Stanford University.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Mon, 21 Dec 1992 13:45:51 -0800
From:         Andy Freeman <andy@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU>
Subject:      Re: prime theories

>> Not being a mind-reader, I won't guess what KAT really "means" and
>> comment only on what he writes.  Since it is so hard to discuss things
>> with him without being a mindreader, perhaps discussing things with
>> him is poor judgment.  I guess that says something about both of us.
>
>So if I say, "men are deprived from a fundamental joy since they
>may get pregnant," you need to be a mind reader in order to realize
>that I simply dropped a "not?"  What do people call this attitude?
>Condescending?

KAT confuses an occasional slipup with a consistent pattern.

>> How about not?  After all, we've seen that progressive marginal has
>> some bad properties and there doesn't seem to be a good argument for
>> it.  (Note that arguments for progressive AVERAGE are not necessarily
>> arguments for progressive MARGINAL.)
>
>"Bad properties," which bad properties?  I don't recall seeing anything.
>Can you elaborate a bit and be a bit more specific?  And "there doesn't seem
>to be a good argument for it?????"  Are you serious?  Did you think I
>would let this pass by?  How about this for at least one good argument
>for it: it put a higher burden on those who can afford it.

Try again.  Progressive AVERAGE rates do put a higher burden on those
who can afford it, but progressive MARGINAL ones may not.  That's one
of the differences between AVERAGE and MARGINAL.

-andy
--
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Fri, 1 Jan 1993 23:30:47 CDT
Comments:     Resending note of Fri,
              1 Jan 1993 22:49:00 EST from Song Weaver
              <JULIE@DRYCAS.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU>
From:         Robert Moss <SPRG0002@TULSAJC.BITNET>
Subject:      Uncl: ActUp/RI joins Colorado Boycott
Comments: To: politics@ohstvma.bitnet

*** Resending note of 01/01/93 21:54

>Monday, January 4th, is the expected date for the passing into law of
>Colorado's Amendment#2.  To mark this day as a day of hate and rage

...extraneous BS deleted...
>Julie

By all means, protest if you feel so led.  However, please do not try to
pass any of this inflammatory rhetoric off as anything more.  Granted, it
is your *opinion*, obviously constructed from the bitterness of a twisted
perception of life that is in direct conflict with the majority view.

Just because you have adopted a *minority opinion* it does not qualify you,
or anyone else, as A MINORITY in the legal sense.  You may also believe the
Earth is flat, but should society be required to reward your mistaken
finding by declaring you a minority worthy of some special protection?
I think not.

Let's cut past the nonsense and admit straight out that Colorado did in fact
not pass anything resembling hate of homosexuals.  The Amendment proclaims
that homosexuals will not be recognized as a minority.  BRAVO for Colorado!

If homosexuals are allowed this privilege, then why not drug addicts and
alcoholics?  Whether you like it or not, your actions are the direct result
of a choice.  If you choose to be homosexual fine.  If I choose not to be,
that also is just fine.  Our choices are equal but in opposite directions.
If my choice to be hetero does not qualify me as a minority then why should
your choice not achieve the same result?

The bottom line is that homosexuality does not deserve the legitimization of
minority status. Colorado has only arrived at the only possible conclusion.

---Robert
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Mon, 28 Dec 1992 18:58:20 CDT
Comments:     Resending note of Mon,
              28 Dec 1992 17:04:58 -0400 from The Integral Differential
              <DEMON@DESIRE.WRIGHT.EDU>
From:         Robert Moss <SPRG0002@TULSAJC.BITNET>
Subject:      Uncl: Re: Pardons: who needs them?
Comments: To: politics@ohstvma.bitnet

*** Resending note of 12/28/92 18:06

...stuff deleted

>          .............................. Now that Bill Clinton is the
>commnder-in-chief (don't you love the sound of that Brett and Robert?),

I am  ot in the military so it doesn't affect me directly.  I don't
particularly like the sound of it, but who cares?  EVEN Billary will get
results with a ready-made military machine.  It should take him at least a
year or two to screw it up.

I do feel for those whose lives will possibly be ended under his watch.  I
can think of little else as insulting as to die under the command of a
liar and coward.  We'll just have to hope for the best.

---Robert
From: dreitman@oregon.uoregon.edu (Daniel R. Reitman, Attorney to Be)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Subject: Re:      Re: well, pardon me!, Version 5
Date: 30 Dec 1992 12:17 PST
Organization: University of Oregon
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: oregon.uoregon.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

In article <POLITICS%92123010000253@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>,      
   K=A*T <MEC038@UKCC.UKY.EDU> writes...
>One additional point: over the weekend Weinberger said that when he said
>that the deal was illegal, he didn't know that the President had
>secretly issued a "Finding" basically allowing such a transaction.

That may be so, but is this really the President's prerogative?  I can see an
advisory opinion by the Attorney General or a secret Executive Order, but a
Finding suggests a legal opinion that is best placed in the hands of the
courts.

							Dan, ad nauseum
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL8]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
Date:         Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:26:46 MET
From:         Grzegorz Albinowski <caius@II.UJ.EDU.PL>
Subject:      merry christmas
Comments: To: Politics Disc List <POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu>

            ^
           /:\        Wesolych Swiat!!!
          /:::\
         /:|x|:\
        /::|x|::\
       /:::|x|:::\
      -----|x|-----                Merry Christmas
       /:::|x|:::\
      /::::|x|::::\                     and
     /:::::|x|:::::\
    /::::::|x|::::::\              the Happy New Year!
   --------|x|-------
    /::::::|x|::::::\
   /:::::::|x|:::::::\
  /::::::::|x|::::::::\                Frohliche Weinachte !
 /:::::::::|x|:::::::::\
/::::::::::|x|::::::::::\
-----------|x|-----------
           |x|
           |x|                                  Caius.
          -----
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU