HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: srzhang@mth.msu.edu (Shuren Zhang)
Subject: Re: not just blood abuse, it's criminal! (Re: 6.4, green card, freedom, money, et al.)
Organization: Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 19:00:59 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.195302.19661@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> yzg9890@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (just call me joe ) writes:
>yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
>
>>"  _____\_____    |----------|  "     /_ ===|        |----
>>     /     \      | _|    |__|        /_------   ----|-----
>>    /       \     |__________|       __/ \ | /       |  \
>> 					 / |\__      |   \
>
>>    |====|      ---| ---|--     /--/  \  /     /
>>  ---------      \/   \ |       |---|------   /|----------|
>>    / |---       /\     |       |-|-| --|--    |  |   |   |
>>   /\_|______          \|       |___|---|--- __|__________|____
>>			       ______/    |
>
>> /    /----|    |---| --|-\-    |==|  \|/     |====|   \/ ----|  |-----|
>> |--|      |    |---| --|--      ||-  /|\   ---------  /\  | \|  |_|_|_|
>> |--|   \  |    |---|   \/      __|__|----|     /|---   |/ |      =| |=
>> |__|     \|     / \    /\__\        |====| ,  /\|____ /|  |___\ --| |--
>
>
>    I agree with you this time!
>

     I agree with both of you on this point!
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Review tow April Fool's joke : -)
From: liujn@bert.cs.byu.edu (liu jun)
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 92 15:38:48 GMT
Organization: Brigham Young University, Utah

    It was not funny at all.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong
From: wlin@byron.u.washington.edu (Wei Lin)
Subject: Re: When is Qing1 Ming2?
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 07:29:08 GMT

In article <wangf.703124247@kynok.ucs.ubc.ca> wangf@unixg.ubc.ca (Frank Wang) writes:
>solar calender.  Now, forget the terms lunar or solar, the yin1 li4 and
>yang2 li4 really confuse me.  I don't understand why Jan. 1 in yin li 

The apt name is Xia4Li4 (Chinese calendar) or Nong2Li4 (Agricultural
calendar). Xia4 is as in Hua2 Xia4 (China).

As to the question, lunar month is 29 days or so, that's why.
From: hee@acf3.NYU.EDU (Enhua HE, , , )
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: It Is Time To Defend Li Peng, China's Hardworking Premire.
Date: 7 Apr 92 17:40:00 GMT
Organization: New York University

>/* acf3:soc.culture.china / xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) /  6:59 pm  Dec 31, 1969 */

>I have attacked Li Peng for a long period of time since 6/4.
>Now I think it is wrong. It was DXP who committed the 6/4
>massacre. People should be aware of it.


>Xiao Li
 
This is the wiseguy who posted the great *news* on Wang Zhen's death on
Mar 31. I guess he thinks today is Fool's Day too. Do me a faver, please
do not post gabage like this and last one anymore.

It is not a great achievement for a comupter student to change the date
you post. After all, today is not Dec. 31, 1969.

If you really have anythingthing wrong, go to see a doctor.
If you are really smart, go to Harvard, or any other first rate
university.

Enhua fron the Big Apple.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: wangf@unixg.ubc.ca (Frank Wang)
Subject: What's the CAAC stand for? (Re: Train from Shanghai to Nanjing
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 05:36:59 GMT

AS the title says.
From: srzhang@mth.msu.edu (Shuren Zhang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: who is FGNC Re: 6.4, green card, freedom, money, et al.
Date: 14 Apr 92 19:23:17 GMT
Organization: Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University

In article <9204111316.AA09857@ecepck.ece.arizona.edu.local> doc@ecepck.ece.arizona.edu.local (doc) writes:
>

(part of reference deleted)

>|> 
>|> <2. In China, people cannot pursue what they want by people themselves,
>|> <   because of CCP.  Hey!  In the US, there is no CCP in power, why don't
>|> <   they get green cards by themselves rather than thru "I don't like to
>|> <   go home, becasue those CCP guys will bet me".          /\
>|>                                                            ||
>|> _Tong4kuai_!                                               ||
>                                                              ||
>    At the time CCP still arrests people simply because they attend someone's
>funeral, simply because they say something in public against CCP, simply
>because they believe in God and prey in family gathering instead of in churches
>controled by CCP, the fear of people is understandable.       ||
>                                                              ||
                                                               ||
  Answer this question please: ----------------------------------
  Why?       

>|> 
>|> <3. maybe CCP owe your parents something, but that's the deal between
>|> <   CCP and your parents.  The issue is: did YOU return what you owe
>|> <   to CCP as yet?
>|> 
>|> Good question, Shannon.  But you have to get even more basic than that.
>|> Past discussions on SCC have revealed that many SCCers *deny* owing anything
>|> to the CCP or their _tong2bao1men_ in China.
>
>    I deny chinese people owing anything to CCP!
>    
     
     Do you owe to your _tong2bao1men_ or the country (CHINA)?
    
>|> 
>|> <4. China become democratic first, or you go home to join the construction
>|> <   of a democratic system for China first?
>|> 
>|> Or would they stay here no matter what the political situation in China?
>
>    Most of chinese here do care about the political situation in China. 
>Only those CCP apologists don't care chinese people, because they simply
>support the CCP bloody regime.
   
     Being against the "red cards"  =/=  supporting the CCP. 
>
>|> 
>|> <5. These "6.4 green cards" shall be called as "red cards" becasue they
>|> <   reflect 6.4. victims' blood.
>|> 
>
>   A fundamental question: Who killed those demonstrated in TAM? Who?
>Chinese students here? or CCP in Beijing? Is CCP ( by the way donkey
>Scott always apologizes for ) order the killing of thousands in 1989?

    The CCP killed those students, my friends, wounded my classmate!  
    But who want to eat "human blood bread"?  
>
>   Help a killer is the same as kill!
>

    Down with the killer, the same as againt the "human blood bread"
eaters!
From: yyg8104@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Post 4 Help )
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Help Needed!
Summary: net help wanted
Keywords: asking help
Date: 6 Apr 92 23:34:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: ux1.1992Apr6.233456.19071
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana


Hi. My friend, who has no access to the net, will send his son (~ 5 yr. )
back to China during the period of  May 15 to August 15. If you or your
relatives plan to go to China in the same period and is/are willing to
help bring his son with you, it will be greatly appreciated. You can 
reply to this email account and I will pass it to my friend. Or you can
call (618)-453-7126 and ask for Mr. Zhang. We will work out how your help
will be compensated. His parents will meet the boy at the airport ( Shanghai
or Beijing ).  It will be great if you depart from Chicago, but that's not
essential.
From: ailili@aludra.usc.edu (Aili Li)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Want to send E-Mail to China but don't know how
Date: 10 Apr 1992 01:55:19 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

I want to send E-Mail to the 501 Research Institute of Aerospace and
Aviation Government Department (hang tian hangkong bu 501 yan ju shuo)

Please E-Mail me if you know the address.  Thank you.


Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: wlin@byron.u.washington.edu (Wei Lin)
Subject: Re: When is Qing1 Ming2?
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 09:30:37 GMT

In article <12211@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> liuc@madrone.eecs.ucdavis.edu (Chia-Liang Liu) writes:
>In article <RK7151.92Apr13154245@eve.albany.edu> rk7151@csc.albany.edu (KWOK RAYMOND Y) writes:
>>
>>	IMO, YinLi is for fisherman and people live beside water,
>>	as you know the tide level and period is resulted of the
>>	moon.
>>
>Exactly, so Hsia (Xia) Li is Yin-Yang Li and Nung- (Nong-) Yu Li.
>It should not be called Yin Li or Nung (Nong) Li.

	Tide level and period depend on the sun too, although the
tidal force due to the moon is larger. (It's not exactly twice per
day due to the sun.) So Ka-Leung is again correct: what fishermen
(and fisherwomen) use is Yin-yang Li.

>Ka-Leung Lau ( Chia-Liang Liu )

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
From: zzuo@iastate.edu (Zhiqi Zuo)
Subject: Re : Most Ridiculous
Summary: No
Keywords: No
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 19:45:04 GMT

   Concerned friends here , I am very sorry to tell you that
  I couldn't find the amount of the gold transferred to Taiwan
around 1948 , even though I looked  for tens of minutes for
the book that I had access about one month ago , in the libary . 

  I looked through almost all the books that was once read and 
related to China . But still couldn't find it . I did located the 
number , the unit is something like " B...on (?)" . My hope is
on a little gray book that was not there at this time . It was 
about China . I forgot the name .

  But One of my friends here told me that About Half A Year Ago
he read a similar article in Hong Kong's " Ming Bao " 
or " 90s ", which gave details about the whole process and the
background , the amount of the gold and its effects to Taiwan .

  He said the whole thing was plotted by Jing Guo .
  Someone else here must have had read the article too . Need 
help to get the information for us . 

So long , so sorry .

Sincerely ,

  Zhiqi Zuo
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: TW.HJ8@isumvs.iastate.edu (CYW)
Subject: Senate Bill
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 01:00:08 GMT

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
HI Mr/Ms Li;

I called the Senate about that bill.  If I got all the correct information,
the bill is passed and is Public Law #101-649. Thank you for letting us know.

Bin-Bin Ding
University of New Hampshire
====================================================

Public Law 101-649 is the New immigration law passed in Nov. 29th, 1990.  This
Bin-Bin person must misunderstood, or the Senate receptionist misunderstood
the question.

Anyone who knows a little about the US legislation process would not believe
that the bill was already a public law.  There are at least a million steps in
between.

CY
From: kniaz@cat6.cs.wisc.edu (Joel Kniaz)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Xue4 ran2 de lyu4 ka3 (Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse)
Date: 15 Apr 92 14:30:46 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison -- Computer Sciences Dept.

In article <1992Apr14.042801.21350@cs.yale.edu> horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes:
>
>Come on, they most certainly did provoke a violent response.  Some of them
>had beaten up (and even killed) policemen, waving their bloody uniforms
>before crowds--all before June 4.  No government would put up with that.
>
><Do you really blame the peaceful student demonstrators or are you 
><so disillusioned with the "wonderful" government of China? (Brainwashed)
>
>I don't blame the *peaceful* student demonstrators.
>
>					--Scott

	This is new information to me.     If the Protesters really had
	"beaten up (and even killed) policemen" _before_ the crackdown,
	it would entirely change my perspective.     If you can provide 
	a reasonable source for this information, I will have no choice
	but to agree with you completely (god forbid  ;>).

     ______________________________________________________________________
    / "Lo, Though I walk through the valley in the shadow of death,       /
    \    I fear not!                                        ______________\
    /  For I am the biggest son-of-a-bitch in the valley." / My favorite  /
    \______________________________________________________\ expression...\
    / Joel Kniaz   kniaz@garfield.cs.wisc.edu  kniaz@jomby /      __i     /
    \______________________________________________________\_yiLballe(Mu)_\
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: s9874203@titan.ucc.umass.edu (s9874203)
Subject: Re: It Is Time To Defend Li Peng, China's Hardworking Premire.
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 21:16:00 GMT

In article <1992Apr7.112848.1471@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:(Subject: It is time to defend Li Peng the
Hardworking Premier) (the stuff is deleted because the subject says
all).

Though I might not agree to Mr.Li (junior :-)'s conclusion, I think it
is necessary for us to give some thought on this issue. We have been
fooled for many many years on many many issues. Don't be fooled again.
How can we avoid being fooled? Simple. Do some research on politics and
learn some history of "class struggle" (:-) and analyze the information
from various medium, then you have your judgement (many of us are
smart, right?). Anyway, don't take anything on politics for granted. Be
skeptical. Why? Politics is dirty.

--Yang
From: mliu@pt.com (Fred Liu)
Subject: Re: Info on small private business in China
Organization: Performance Technologies, Incorporated
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 12:34:49 GMT

In article <kuk7n7INNfa6@physics.usc.edu> lic@physics.usc.edu (Li Chen) writes:
>In article <1992Apr13.170956@IASTATE.EDU> kai@IASTATE.EDU (Kai Sun) writes:
>
>China if you don't want to pay uncle Sam. Further, since you are an F-1 or
>J-1, although it is perfect OK for you to own a company here, you are not
>allowed to 'work' in your company. In other word, you can not let company
>pay you for your time. So if you want to have profit from US operation,
>you will have to employ at least 1 US legal employee.

Just a comment here:
You can change your visa status to a bussiness visa (I don't know
exactly what visa it is, anyway, there are such kinds of status),
then you become the owner of the bussiness.  Though you will have
different means of getting green card, you can run your bussiness,
which doesn't necessarily employ some people.  There are a lot of
small bussinesses with just 1 person.
-- 
__
Fred Liu, Performance Technologies Incorporated	mliu@pt.com
315 Science Parkway, Rochester, New York 14620            uupsi!ptsys1!mliu
From: s9874203@titan.ucc.umass.edu (s9874203)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: cease fire
Date: 15 Apr 92 22:15:31 GMT
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

In article <92106.011618SXS30@psuvm.psu.edu> SXS30@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>
>HI, EVERYONE IN THE NET!  Can we cease fire for a week?!
>
>SCC LOOKS LIKE A BATTLE FIELD FOR ME. I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE EMOTIONLY
>DEFENDING SOME POLITICAL VIEW, BUT THE SMOOK IS TOO MUCH AND I HOPE
>EVERYONE INVOVED IN THE DEBATE CAN COOL DOWN A LITTLE BIT.
>        HOW ABOUT DISCUSS SOME FOLK'S SONGS?

No battle, no SCC.:-) How many civil wars in the whole Chinese history?
Fortunately now we can fight while sitting in the armchair...
From: dxl0243@hertz.njit.edu (Dong Liu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: cease fire
Date: 15 Apr 92 18:17:22 GMT
Organization: New Jesery Institute of Technology
X-News-Reader: GNUS 3.14.1 for GNU Emacs 18.57.4

>>>>> On 15 Apr 92 05:16:18 GMT, SXS30@psuvm.psu.edu said:

SXS30> HI, EVERYONE IN THE NET!  Can we cease fire for a week?!

SXS30> SCC LOOKS LIKE A BATTLE FIELD FOR ME. I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE
SXS30> ARE EMOTIONLY DEFENDING SOME POLITICAL VIEW, BUT THE SMOOK IS
SXS30> TOO MUCH AND I HOPE EVERYONE INVOVED IN THE DEBATE CAN COOL
SXS30> DOWN A LITTLE BIT.  HOW ABOUT DISCUSS SOME FOLK'S SONGS?

What I will do is put soc.culture.china on my global kill file.

Farewell everyone!
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dong Liu                           ||  New Jersey Institute of
dxl0243@hertz.njit.edu             ||  Technology
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse (Re: 6.4, green card, freedom...)
Date: 15 Apr 92 05:20:36 GMT
Organization: Netix Communications, Inc.


yzg9890@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (joe ) wrote:

+Shannon Yeh of netix.com writes:
+
+>i thought about this idea be4, but i don't think it will work. 
+>the concerns are:
+
+>	1) will they stay quiet in the US?
+>	2) will they realize that they are not qualified to "fIgHT" for China's
+>	   freedom infrastructure?
+>	3) will they return what they owe to china?
+>	4) will they make sure:
+
+   Commmme on! Don't mess up CHINA and the current government!  I have PR, but
+   I have never tried to change my nationality. People here want to get green
+   card do not mean they dislike china. They just want to get away from china
+   government if need. I'm sure most people will go back to china when the time
+   comes.

	Again, we are talking about 6.4 "blood card" or "red card", not the 
	normal ones.  Thru normal avenues, you can have houndreds of cards
	for youself if you have ways to work them out.

shannon
-------
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: yzg9890@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (just call me joe )
Subject: Re: response to "cease fire" call (Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 20:08:33 GMT


OK, this one is screwed up. Let get next one!

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: srzhang@mth.msu.edu (Shuren Zhang)
Subject: Re: response to "cease fire" call (Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse)
Organization: Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 19:27:02 GMT

In article <12272@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> xu@toadflax.UUCP (Hao Xu) writes:
>
> [sentences I am not proper to comment deleted] 
>
>5) At present time, while the CCP is still prosecuting dissidents in
>   China, there is nothing unethical to seek permant residency in the
>   US through political reason.
  
    Those who want to get a green card through political reasons can seek
    political asylum if they have proof that they will be persecuted by CCP.
    Don't abuse 6.4 blood.  The Bush Administrative Orders protect whom? 
    Protect those in safety!  Not those 6.4 victims.  We 6.4 participants 
    are strongly against this protection order.  I don't need such a 
    protection even if I am a poor student.  Before I came,  many 
    6.4 participants were talking about what happened here, "what are they
    doing, those selfish countryfellows?"  

    I also learned that, when it came to lobby for the protection order,
    Senates receiced a large number of calls or letters from CSSers; but when
    it came to lobby them to support efforts aimed at enhancing human rights
    in China, much fewer responses were received in the Senate.  Why the
    difference?   The difference indicates some just want to abuse 6.4 blood.

>6) CCP is not only responsible for 6/4 massacre, 
  
    completely correct!

>but also for the current
>   political repression in China 

    completely correct!

and for forcing CSSers staying in the US.
>

    I am not sure. 

>Hao

Shuren Zhang
From: xiaofei@acsu.buffalo.edu (XiaoFei Wang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Xue2xi2 Li3 Peng2, hao3 bang3yang4?  : -)  (Re: Li Peng getting a sense of humor.)
Date: 6 Apr 92 21:39:25 GMT
Organization: Physics Dept, State U of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260

/* From the keyboard of horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) */:
: He was a straight-A student and still speaks Russian fluently.
:
:Again, it's no joke.
:

I have to support Scott Horne. He was not only a straight-A student, but
also a `three good' student. 

SCCers should not feel ashamed for not being able to speak Russian.
Scott Horne can not speak it either. 

-- 
xiaofei@acsu.buffalo.edu | Subscribe Chinese Poem Exchange and Discussion List 
mail LISTSERV@UBVM.BITNET with "SUB CHPOEM-L 1st LastName" in the MESSAGE BODY
InterNet Address: UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU | Posting in UUENCODED GB and BIG5
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne)
Subject: Re: 6.4, green card, freedom, money, et al.
Organization: Computer "Science" Dept, Yale University
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 07:41:21 GMT

In article <12154@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>, xu@toadflax.UUCP (Hao Xu) writes:
<In article <1992Apr12.013054.22753@cs.yale.edu> horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes:
[Shannon writes:]
<
<><	You students caused the killing!! You did not give them any additional
<><	choice!
<>
<>Absolutely.  (Though the Chinese government handled the matter very poorly.
<>If they had had any intelligence, they would've simply broken up the
<>demonstration with tear gas on the very first day.  Then no one would've
<>died, the image of the PRC [such as it is] would not have been tarnished,
[... and Hao Xu cut off the rest of the statement.]

I stand by what I said.

<Whose image has been tarnished? The glorious, great, correct party? Or the
<dear, loving goverment?

Both; but more importantly, the country of China, where a quarter of the
world's population lives.

<So you think it is CCP's mistake to order 6/4
<massacre?

The CCP did *NOT* order any "massacre".  Period.  Don't bandy the word `CCP'
about so freely.

<You should think it a glorious, great, correct decision
<made by the glorious, great, correct party and deserve a full page
<ad. on NY Time.

Oh, don't think I don't have my opinions of the incident.  I'm talking about
the use of force, though.  And it got plenty of front-page "ads" in all
sorts of papers.  This fact attests to the PRC government's mishandling of
the incident.

(And by the way, the correct phrasing is "great, glorious, correct".)

<You should go to the 'study-class' for
<3 month to accept re-education and write 100 self-critism report.

Oh, really, Mr "Expert"?  Seems you're too busy indulging in self-praise
to bother with any self-criticism.

					--Scott

-- 
Scott Horne                               ...!{harvard,cmcl2,decvax}!yale!horne
horne@cs.Yale.edu      SnailMail:  Box 7196 Yale Station, New Haven, CT   06520
203 436-1848                Residence:  Rm 1848 Silliman College, New Haven, CT
ZANG4 HAN4 YI4 JIA1 / GONG4 JIAN4 ZHONG1HUA2!
From: yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh)
Subject: 6.4 red card is blood abuse (Re: 6.4, green card, freedom...)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Organization: Netix Communications, Inc.
Date: 13 Apr 92 10:02:20 GMT

In article <9204122049.AA06875@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu>, xu@CS.UCDAVIS.EDU (Hao Xu) wrote:

+
+In article <29E7B015.21573@noiro.acs.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
+>+
+>+Shannon, it is long since you sold your 4 big freedom. Where is it now?
+>+Since you advocate 4 big freedom in China, why don't you try to carry it out
+>+in China? Why only advocate it in the States? Oh, I see, you need to protect
+>+yourself. May I ask which party is now protecting your freedom of speech?
+>+Third or fourth or fifth? Isn't it hypocratic?
+>
+>	Thank you for mentioning my "4 big freedom".  This idea has obtained 
+>	good "market sharing".  I and my comrades will do whatever we can
+>	to implement these freedoms for China.
+
+Shannon, you stiil fail to answer my question. Other people wanted to
+fight freedom for China, you told them "if you really want it, stay in China,
+don't come to the US." Now, you said you want to fight freedom for China.
+Apply your own logic to yourself, I suppose you will go back to China. Now,
+answer me whether you are going to go back, and when.

	Yes, I did go back to China and will permenently go back to China 
	in the future.

+>	Also, my "4 big freedom" has got unbelievable, "operational" response
+>	from people in China.  
+
+Are you going to ask people in China to fight for your 4 big freedom while
+you yourself stay here safely? If so, what's the difference between you and
+the d-fighters you accused? If not, when will you go back to China?

	First of all, I do NOT have safety problems.  I was safe, and is 
	still safe.  Because I have never done any non-ethical things.

	Second, I went back to serve China already. 

	Third, I have tried to get a green card for myself thru 6.4 blood.

	4thly, i have never labeled myself as a "d-fighter".

	finally, don't even try to associate Shannon Yeh with those D-fighters.

	Period.

shannon
-------
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china