HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nlu@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu)
Subject: Re: Mattingly, what a fine fielder (was: Hardly not etc.)
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 20:18:52 GMT

In article <1dgu0oINN82n@mozz.unh.edu> ggg@kepler.unh.edu (Gregory G Greene) writes:

>	So if you are suddenly put in the position of being a major league
>   manager, you would evaluate talent in spring training by sitting in the
					  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   clubhouse waiting for someone to hand you each games stats, without
>   ever having to bother watching a game. 

Hey, statheads don't usually evaluate players by looking at spring training
stats by themselves; they are generally too small samples anyway.

Besides, *watching is deceiving*, but that doesn't mean that you shouldn't
watch; however, evaluating *by watching alone*, which is what many non-
statheads seem to advocate, is bound to cause huge errors like evaluating
Thomas Howard, due to his muscles, as a power-hitter.  Besides, observation
tends to de-emphasize things as drawing walks.

===============================================================================
GO CALIFORNIA ANGELS!
===============================================================================
Nelson Lu (claudius@leland.stanford.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: jpc@philabs.philips.com (John P. Curcio)
Subject: Watch the damn Newsgroups!!! (WAS: Re: Canada's Sport?)
Followup-To: rec.sport.baseball
Organization: Philips Laboratories, Briarcliff Manor, NY.
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 20:39:27 GMT

In article <1992Nov3.014030.1208@julian.uwo.ca> cazabon@csd.uwo.ca (Yvan Cazabon) writes:

[about baseball]

Please keep this out of rec.sport.hockey-- it doesn't belong there...

-JPC

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John P. Curcio 		          Go Bruins!		   Philips Laboratories
jpc@philabs.philips.com 			           345 Scarborough Road
(914) 945-6442               	 		     Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: 5 truly unbreakable records.
Date: 13 Nov 92 23:34:36 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

: But while we're at it, I suspect the record could be 0, but I don't
: know if it has ever happened in the Majors. If the first batter in an
: inning is batting out of order, isn't that an automatic 3 outs?
: --
: Douglas Jacobson		             __o                  GO METS!
: jacobson@pleiades.cs.bucknell.edu          `\_<,                  GO JETS!

I don't have my rule book with me, but I think that's only one out.
Furthermore, if I remember correctly, the opposing team would have
to throw at least one pitch in order to appeal and have the guy 
thrown out.  Correct me if I'm wrong, anybody with a better memory.
Bill Anderson:  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: niguma@ug.cs.dal.ca (Gordon Niguma)
Subject: Re: Comparing Eckersley vs. noname reliever
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 03:18:23 GMT

In <1992Nov11.182624.7303@leland.Stanford.EDU> brian@leland.Stanford.EDU (Brian McDonald) writes:

>In article <BxItuu.4JI@cs.dal.ca> olerud@ug.cs.dal.ca (John Olerud) writes:

>>  But as far as actual performance when they were in there, I think Hernandez
>>was better than Eck. The OBA was a mere 7 points higher while the SA was
>>notably lower than the ex-alcoholic (cheap shot!) at a 34 point difference.
>                        -------------------------

>Please explain to me what this phrase has to do with baseball.  Why do
>you feel it necessary to note that Eckersley is an "ex-alcoholic?"

  Just to be annoying. Hey, alot of people take shots at players on the net,
Fettucini Griffin, Jim Acker, Tree STump Lansford......I thought I'd be
more personal. I did note it was a cheap shot, and you can flame me for this
but I really hate Eck. The fact that he is an ex-alcoholic is irrelevant to
baseball......but if this isn't irrelevant then no one should post about how
Canseco wants $50 for an autograph or that Puckett is such a sweet, fun-loving
dude. I enjoy hearing about player's personality traits. As for what it means
in the context of the conversation we had, it meant nothing other than a cheap
slag at Eckersley.

					Gord Niguma
					(fav player: John Olerud)


Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Comparing Eckersley vs. noname reliever
Date: 12 Nov 92 18:50:05 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino CA, USA

In article <BxL2In.7Kr@cs.dal.ca> niguma@ug.cs.dal.ca (Gordon Niguma) writes:
>In <1992Nov11.182624.7303@leland.Stanford.EDU> brian@leland.Stanford.EDU (Brian McDonald) writes:
>
>but I really hate Eck. The fact that he is an ex-alcoholic is irrelevant to

Its not only a cheap shot, its not accurate.

As anybody who knows(ie. an alcoholic or someone who knows an alcoholic)
and they will tell you there is no such thing as an "ex alcoholic". Once
an alcoholic always an alcoholic, if you start drinking again, you are
right back where you left off(one of my best friends is in AA and this
is one of the first things they teach you).




Russ Smith
*******************************************************************************

"What an angry clown!" -- Jerry Seinfeld

********************************************************************************
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: India vs. SA pres. XI, end of 1st day
Date: 6 Nov 1992 19:27:53 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsd.csd.mu.edu

In article <colin.26@physci.uct.ac.za>, colin@physci.uct.ac.za (COLIN HENDERSON) writes:
>At stumps, the Presidant XI were 268 all out.

>Prabhakar was getting great swing, and ended with 3/38 off 17.  Bannerjee 
>looked fairly innocuous with 1/26 off 13.  Raju: 2/57 off 19,  
                                            ------------------

"Pathetic".
					
						
Shastri took 2/24 off 14.  

Seems to be bowling a lot these days (A lot compared to 
his post-reliance cupo standards)


       *********************************
       *	N.Ramasubramanian      *    	    
       * 	                       *    
       *	Dept. of Mech. Engg.   *    
       *	Marquette University   *    
       *********************************
From: B536HIND@UTARLVM1.UTA.EDU (C. S. Sudarshana bhat)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Cricket quiz
Date: 6 Nov 1992 21:30:19 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

The three instances in which Gavaskar scored two separate centuries in
the same Test match are:
124 and 220, vs. West Indies, Port Of Spain, 1971.  Result: Draw.
111 and 137, vs. Pakistan, Karachi, 1978.  Result: Pakistan (Imran?) won.
107 and 182 n.o., vs. West Indies, Calcutta, 1978-79.  Result: India won.

Didn't Chetan Sharma take another hat-trick this past fortnight against
Zimbabwe in a one-dayer?
From: rajiv@dvorak.amd.com (Rajiv Malhotra)
Subject: India-President's XI (some details)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Austin, Texas
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 20:19:55 GMT


CRICKET: CRONJE, INDIAN BOWLERS SHARE DAY'S HONOURS
SCORE-BOARD
PRESIDENT'S XI(First innings) - Steyn - 0, Lazard - 16, Koen -49,
Cronje- 73, Rindel - 0 , Stewart - 41, Mahuwa - 29, Rundle - 12, Bosch - 4,
Lyle - 22, Schultz (not out) 4, Extras- 18, Total - 268.
Fall of wickets - 1-3, 2-41, 3-87, 4-89, 5-182, 6-194, 7-218, 8-228, 9-254.

INDIAN BATSMAN RATTLED BY SCHULTZ'S PACE
CENTURION PARK - The Indian batsman brought to their knees by pace in a
fashion that was only familiar, and feared to. Brett Schultz, a left arm
seamer did what Bruce Reid and Mike Whitney in the recent past, and many
others of the tribe had to. The 23 year old from East London almost
certainly made the springbok side with that 5 wicket haul on a wicket
which could never be termed quick.
SCORE-BOARD
PRESIDENT'S XI(First innings) -268
INDIA I INNINGS - Ravi Shastri - 10, WV Raman - 20, M Prabhakar -9,
S Tendulkar - 11, M Azaruddin -2, Praveen Amre - 23, Kiran More,
Venkatapathy Raju - 0, S Banerjee -0 Chetan Sharma (notout) - 25,
J.Srinath - 8 Extras - 36  Total 164.
PRESIDENT'S XI (2nd innings)
Rudolf Steyn - 0, Terence Lazard(no) - 43, Louis Koen - 4,
Hansie Cronje(no) - 20, Extras - 10  Total for 2 wickets 77
Bowling -
M. Prabhakar 7-2-10-1
J. Srinath 8-1-21-10
Chetan Sharma 3-0-16-0
S. Banerjee 4-0-12-0
Venkatapaty Raju 3-0-8-0
Ravi Shastry 1-0-1-0

INDIANS NEED 296 FOR VICTORY
SCORE-BOARD
PRESIDENT'S XI(First innings) - 268
INDIA (I Innings) - 164
PRESIDENT'S XI (II innings) - Steyn - 0, Lazard - 15, Koen -4,
Cronje- 53, Rindel - 22 , Stewart - 17, Mahuwa - 32, Rundle - 1,
Bosch - 2,  Schultz (not out) 0, Extras- 17, Total - 200.
Bowling
M.Prabhakar 16-3-42-2
J.Srinath 18-2-49-4
C. Sharma 12-0-45-0
S.Banerjee 4-0-12-0
V Raju  13.3-3-32-1
R.Shastry 6-1-7-3
India (II Innings) - R.Shastry (Batting) - 5, WV Raman(Batting) -2,
Extras - 2 Total for no loss - 9

RAIN RUINS INDIAN BID
CENTORIAN  PARK- Overnight rains washed out the fourth and final day of
the cricket match between Indian XI and the President XI at the Centorian
Park here today.

-- 
  
--- There is no future in time travel.
 
****     Rajiv Malhotra    *** 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: s2p5386@summa.tamu.edu (PARMEKAR, SANDEEP G)
Subject: cricket query
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords:  cricket query/the lal's
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 09:22:00 GMT

Does anyone out there know if Madanlal and Arunlal are related to
each other??


Sandeep Parmekar
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Zim v NZ D4 post tea
Date: 11 Nov 1992 08:00:30 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

NZ v Zim D4 post lunch  Updated at 13:55 GMT
  
      Zimbabwe lost three more wickets before lunch and Houghton declared their
first innings twenty minutes before lunch, with 52 runs behind. It makes Zim
283 for 9 declared. S'oua had six wickets. His figures were 5 for 76 when
bagged his fifth wicket.

      NZ are 21 for 1 when Latham was out for 10. Greatbatch is the other
opener with 9.
      NZ are 100 for 3. Greatbatch was out for 13 and Andrew Jones for 38.
Martin Crowe is on 31 and Rutherford on 16.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: corsair@bach.udel.edu (CORSAIR the Pirate)
Subject: Re: PM XI beats WI
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 14:44:06 GMT


Here's something you all might find "interesting". 

From CRICKETS@VM1.NoDak.EDU Thu Nov 12 08:02:11 1992

Aus PM XI v WI

     An Australian PM XI beat Australia by 3 runs in Canberra. PM XI scored 233
		             ^^^^^^^^^^^
for 7 in 50 overs. Dean Jones scored 76 and Bevin scored scored 58. Ian Bishop
took two wickets. In reply WI scored 230 for 9. Reiffel took four wickets while
David Williams scored 59.


My dear KS Rao, I really appreciate what you are doing, but as one other
fine newsgroup-reader suggested sometime ago, please proof-read your messages
before sending them! 

Gosh, I never knew that Bishop and Williams played for Australia! :-):-)


Corsair (the "Picky Picky" Pirate)

********************************************************************************
**   ___  ____  ____  ____  ____  ____  ____  **                              **
**  /    /   / /___/ /___  /__ /   /   /___/  **  Stay cool.	              **
** /___ /___/ / \_  ___ / /   / __/_  / \_    **  May the Schwartz            **
**				              **	     be with you.     **
**    e-mail: corsair@chopin.udel.edu         **            _|\ /|_           **
**    104 Harter Hall, 837-8509               **            \'o.O'/           **
**    University of Delaware                  **            =(___)=           **
**    Computer & Information Science          **               U              **
********************************************************************************

-- 

********************************************************************************
**   ___  ____  ____  ____  ____  ____  ____  **                              **
**  /    /   / /___/ /___  /__ /   /   /___/  **  Stay cool.	              **
From: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: WI beats WA in a four day game
Date: 9 Nov 92 12:38:08 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.BxG8FK.H8B
Reply-To: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


  WI v WA  D4

    West Indies beat WA in the four day game. WI declared their second innings
at 326 for 4 setting 368 runs for WA for a win. Aurthurton scored an unbeaten
104 and Hooper a 60. Benjamin took three wickets, with figures of 3 wkts for 2
runs at one stage. Hooper gor three wickets, with Ambrose and Patterson getting
two apiece.

K. Sankara Rao                          e-mail ksrao@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu

Department of Electrical Engineering
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105  USA

Phone:  (701)237-7217  (o)
        (701)235-9912  (h)
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Zim v NZ T2 D3 Lunch
Date: 10 Nov 1992 06:30:40 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

NZ v Zim T2 D3 Lunch

    Zimbabwe lost three wickets this morning, all to S'oua and they are 218 for
6 in their first innings in reply to NZ total og 335 all out.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4711,,21273)
Subject: Re: SA World Cup shock
Reply-To: shamim@bellcore.com
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 15:26:13 GMT

In article 6935@news.duke.edu,  shafqat@neuro.duke.edu (Saad Shafqat) writes:
>
>Well .... perhaps I misunderstood.  I got the impression that either England
>or Australia must cast a consenting vote for a WC bid to go through.  So
>is it that even if England and Australia both opposed a motion it would
>carry so long as a majority consented ?
>
>
>Saad.
>
Sometime later this year England and Australia are slated to lose their veto power 
in ICC. A majority then will be able to pass a motion. 
	--SAN
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: PM XI beats WI
Date: 12 Nov 1992 06:18:56 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

     12 Nov 1992

NZ v Zim  D5

      NZ declared their second innings 262 for 5 before lunch setting Zimbabwe
a total of 315 for a win in 68 or 69 overs. Rutherford was out this morning for
89. Deepak Patel was not out with 58.

     Zimbabwe are 28 for 3 a few minutes after lunch.

Aus PM XI v WI

     An Australian PM XI beat Australia by 3 runs in Canberra. PM XI scored 233
for 7 in 50 overs. Dean Jones scored 76 and Bevin scored scored 58. Ian Bishop
took two wickets. In reply WI scored 230 for 9. Reiffel took four wickets while
David Williams scored 59.
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: India v President's XI Day3 stumps
Date: 8 Nov 1992 19:35:12 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway

   Updated   17:45 GMT on 7 Nov 1992


India v President's XI Day 3

     Indian need 305 runs for a victory on the last day. President's XI were
cheaply dismissed today with the last 7 wickets falling for 63. runs. Srinath
took 4 for 49 and Shastry 3 for 7. India are 9 for no loss at the stumps (I do
not know whether the need 305 in the second innings or 305 more runs)
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Answers to Trivia
Date: 9 Nov 1992 15:09:20 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsd.csd.mu.edu

	Answers to trivia
	-----------------

Hi guys ,
1. When did India win it's first test , where
and against whom?

	Against England at Madras in 1951-52 
	series

2. Who was the first person to retire hurt in
a test match?

	Charlie Bannermann of Australia
	165 r.h. against England in the
	inaugural test.

3. Who is the only cricketer in the world to
score century in both innings of  a test match
thrice? What are these instances?

	Sunny Gavaskar
	Against W.I. at Port of Spain in 1971
	Against Pakistan at Karachi in 1978
	Against W.I. at Calcutta in 1978-79


4. Who was the first Indian Batsman who scored
another century after a century in his debut.?

	G.R.Visvanath

5. How many Indian bowlers have taken a hat-trick
in Test Cricket? and in One-dayers?

	tests : none
	ODI   : Chetan Sharma in Wc '87
		(before the current season).


       *********************************
       *	N.Ramasubramanian      *    	    
       * 	                       *    
       *	Dept. of Mech. Engg.   *    
       *	Marquette University   *    
       *********************************

       *********************************
       *	N.Ramasubramanian      *    	    
       * 	                       *    
       *	Dept. of Mech. Engg.   *    
       *	Marquette University   *    
       *********************************
From: hndcol02@uctvax.uct.ac.za (Colin Henderson, Physics Dept. UCT)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: <None>
Date: 12 Nov 92 18:09:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: uctvax.1992Nov12.160903.203260
Organization: University of Cape Town




> 	And can someone comment on the selection of Omar Henry ?? I know

I think that the selectors have erred in this regard.  Henry has never
been much of a success in the international arena. 


> he's been doing great in the Castle Cup (or decently, anyhow), but I didnt
> think he had any chance of making the team here ! I mean, is Kingsmead
> expected to take turn ??? 

Well, he got eight wickets against Natal at (I think) Kingsmead (six in the first innings and
only two in the second, and didn't get any after Natal had shut up
shop.

I wans't particularly surprised to see him make it, though. 

> Considering it was the home ground of Van Der
> Bijl and Procter (and Le roux?)

Le Roux was Newlands based.

>  when it was supposedly really fast, the
> spinner was the last thing I expected. Has the ground changed character ??
> (BTW, if Henry has the sense and enough of Kep's confidence to toss it up
> and try to buy wickets, I'll bet he gets bags of wickets in this series.

I think that's the only way he will get them.  He's not a great turner
of the ball. More a floater.

Rhodes was probably the best choice for his home ground.  The doubts
were about his ability to stick around. He proved it last week with a
gritty 65 and then a sparkling 130+. Added to an 80 last week, pretty
good going.  Still, Hansie IMHO has more class.

I'm also delighted to see Jimmy in the team.  Had to wait nearly 20
years. (Nearly a record). I've always been a Cook fan, even though he
plays for the Transvaal.  I remember watching him, Fothers, Pollock
and Rice at Newlands, and being in a terrible quandary, when each
beautifully struck boundary meant four more for the opposition. (But
then we had Kirsy and Lamb).

I think picking Brett Schultz was also a mistake, or rather picking both
Schultz and Pringle.  Too many strike bowlers and not enough
containing bowlers. I think Matthews was very unfortunate not to make
the side. He's been in form, has bowled very tightly as well as taking
6/50 on a track which was giving the bowlers very little assistance.

Schultz had only picked up four wickets at 40-50 (I think) runs apiece
in his previous two matches, so this might be a flash in the pan. 
Hope the Indians don't take him apart.

In short, SA might be giong into this match with only three bowlers,
Donald, Pringle and McMillan (and he hasn't been extremely impressive
with the ball lately, either)

I put head on block and predict a high-scoring draw.

-- 
Colin Henderson
Physics Dept, UCT, Cape Town, South Africa.
colin@physci.uct.ac.za

------------------natural selection favours paranoia!-------------------
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: NZ v Zim ODI -2
Date: 8 Nov 1992 19:35:07 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway

   Updated   17:45 GMT on 7 Nov 1992

Zim v NZ ODI

       Today, New Zealand played its second ODI with Zimbabwe. It is historical
since this is the first time that a test match was interrupted to play a
one-day game.

      Zim. won the toss and scored 271 for 6 in 50 overs. The Flower btothers
put on 124 for the first wicket and Houghton scored 50 in 42 balls. Decker also
had a half-century ( he made 55).

      New Zealand made 272 for 6 with 19 balls to spare. Greatbatch and Latham
had a 98 run opening partnership. Greatbatch scored 55 and Latham 40. Crowe
scored 94 off 87 balls and Rutherford scored 37 runs.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: smitra@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Sami Mitra)
Subject: POSTING OF SCORES
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 20:23:47 GMT

Lately many of the important scores of various matches are not
being posted on the rec.sport.cricket.scores newsgroup.
That was created precisely because one needs to sift through
far too much stuff in this newsgroup to get the scores.

If anyone posts any scores on this newsgroup would they please
post them on that one too!


						Sami Mitra
From: sagrawal@cco.caltech.edu (Sanjay Kumar Agrawal)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: ZIM vs NZ T2 FINAL
Date: 12 Nov 1992 15:06:39 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: alumni.caltech.edu

Chasing 315 to win, Zimbabwe were bowled out for 137, 30 minutes after tea
on the final day. Dipak Patel was the hero for Kiwis taking 6 for 52. By the
way, I could catch the commentary very clearly on Radio New Zealand.

Sanjay Agrawal
Oracle Corporation
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ahmed@ee.tamu.edu (Jubayer Ahmed)
Subject: Mistake
Organization: Texas A&M University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:36:58 GMT


Hi netters,
	   Last night I was trying to make a posting about Picking on 
	   Dr. Rao and I was having trouble because it was not going 
	   through. I tried several times. I tried to read the news 
	   group also if anything went there. But nothing showed up. 
	   After that I quit and I thaught the system might be unable 
	   to send it to the net. This morning I logged in and tried 
	   to read rec.sport.cricket and I found, unfortunately, it is 
	   flooded with my same mail. That was totally unintentional     
	   and I am sorry, but then again, the blame should go to the 
	   server, not me.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: gbalakri@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Ganeshkumar Balakrishnan)
Subject: Re: Answers to Trivia
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 14:36:27 GMT

In article <00963597.4CBA25C0@vms.csd.mu.edu> 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu write
s:
>    Answers to trivia
>    -----------------
>5. How many Indian bowlers have taken a hat-trick
>in Test Cricket? and in One-dayers?
>
>    tests : none
>    ODI   : Chetan Sharma in Wc '87
>         (before the current season).
>
>
>       *********************************
>       * N.Ramasubramanian      *
>       *                             *
>       * Dept. of Mech. Engg.   *
>       * Marquette University   *
Did not Kapil achieve this feat in the last Asia Cup Final against Sri Lanka?
-- 
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ganeshkumar Balakrishnan
"Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you" - heard
in passing.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket