From: delledg@uts.cc.wayne.edu (DeVaughn Elledge)
Subject: Larger Women 
Organization: Wayne State University, Detroit Mich.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 23:00:35 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.164944.13142@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> krw@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (keith.r.smith) writes:
>In article <1992Nov12.225927.24920@uts.cc.wayne.edu> delledg@uts.cc.wayne.edu (DeVaughn Elledge) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov11.200343.21007@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> krw@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (keith.r.smith) writes:
>>>In article <1drjadINNbp1@morrow.stanford.edu> HF.GTD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Gabrielle Daniels) writes:
>>>>In article <1992Nov10.153448.774@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>,
>>>>krw@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (keith.r.smith) writes in response to mine
>>>>and others to this earthshattering conversation (with previous
>>>>stuff deleted because of course, this is getting longer than really
>>>>necessary):
>>>Agreed!
>>>>                          <stuff deleted>>.
>The bottom line with me re women with/without children, is that as long
>as there are nice women available who _do not_ already have children, then
>why should I want to make extra work for myself by dating a nice woman who
>_does_ already have children.  When you date a single, childless woman,
>you only have to deal with her.... her likes/dislikes/foibles/moods/needs
>and schedule.  I think that most brothers would have their hands full with
>these things alone.  If she has children, then you have a whole bunch of
>_additional_ things to deal with as listed above, and more stuff not listed.
>>
>>>>>
>My brother, if your SO weighs about 200, but looks like 150, then she
>is quite likely on the tall side (no problem with that), quite likely
>fairly large boned (again, no problem), and quite likely in excellent
>physical condition (does she have a sister :-)).  I would say that,
>by definition, she must be pretty near her personal fightin' weight.
>On the other hand, of the women that _I_ dated that were about 200lb or so,
>neither one of them was about 5'2", and the other was maybe about 5'4".
>Granted, one of them was built quite a bit better than the other, but even
>she was obviously well over (by a good 40-50lbs.) her best fightin' weight.
>Think what you will, but a woman who is so far beyond her own personal
>fightin' weight that she has rolls on her back, a big "gut" out to here,
>"cellulite" on her hips and thighs, saggy breasts, and not much shape
>or tone to speak of...... this women is simply not gonna' look good to
>me nude.  If she is a naturally big woman who has supple skin, good
>proportions, a reasonable waistline, shapely hips and thighs, and reasonably
>good tone throughout....... I'm interested!  The biggest woman that I ever
>saw in person, and who impressed me as having a great shape, had to be about
>5'8", and every bit of 180 well-stacked pounds.  She had the "thighs of life",
>and, shall we say, there were no _small parts on this model.  Yet and still,
>she had a reasonably trim midsection (ie., no rolls or "spare tire" or
>whatever), she had full, well-rounded breasts that didn't sag or droop,
>and she was well-toned and shaped all over.  I mean, homegirl looked _good_!
>There just ain't too many built like her in my neck-o-the-woods. 
>Mind you, I have seen plenty of larger women who have great parts, but
>not too many that have a great figure overall.
>
>Keith

Yes, she does have two sisters. One of them is smaller and she has a great
figure two. they were born with that figure. No matter what size they get
they keep the same shape, unbelievable!! No rolls, maybe a little stomach but
its doesn't take away from her overall appearance. But they person, I spoke 
about earlier body is complemented by the fact she has a great attitude and
you got to have both in my book to be beautiful to me!! Those proportions are
a knockout but that insides go to be there too!!               

As for proportions, shes about 5'4" believe it or not and has big bones.
She has the "thighs of life" along with the sexy calfs(sp?) of life and the
black womens trade mark--"the big booty". (flame suit on). Has has creamy brown
sugar skin and serious dimples!! Beautiful personalty once again. Can't have   
they outside without the inside!!

================================================================================
=  De Vaughn A. Elledge      **            What!?! CLINTON WON??? 
=                            **  Now who's going to go help Bush move out!! 
= DELLEDG @ WAYNEST1         **  We know it won't be Quayle, he can't spell. 
= DELLEDG @ JAKE.CC.WAYNE.EDU** ================================================
=                            ** Detroit Rockers: 1991 NPSL CHAMPIONS!!!! 
= Wayne State University     ** Detroit Lions: 1991 Cntrl. Div. Champs 
= Detroit, MI                ** Go Pistons, Redwings, Tigers, Turbos!!!!
============================ ** Go Tartars, Wolverines, Drive!!!     
================================================================================


Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american