HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rja@newbirth.Eng.Sun.COM (Robert Allen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: Re: hi frequency
Date: 15 Dec 1992 18:34:16 GMT
Organization: Sun
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: newbirth

In article <1992Dec14.194150.5027@linus.mitre.org> m14494@mwvm.mitre.org (Mike White) writes:
>In article <13DEC199219414732@ucsvax.sdsu.edu> lingr1000@ucsvax.sdsu.edu 
>(ZHANG Z) writes:
>>  What is the formula for calculating the length of
>> random wire? 
>
>Length (feet) = (984*(N-0.025)) / Freq (Mhz)
>
>where N is the number of full waves on the antenna.  Thus, 
>a 2 wavelength antenna at 15 Mhz would be:
>
>984*(2-0.025)/15 = 129.56 feet.  The gain of the
>longwire antenna varies more or less linearly with
>the number of wavelenghts long it is; the longer the
>antenna wire, the better.  Longwire antennas are 
>directional; the longer they are, the more directional.
>Maximum gain is along the direction of the length of
>the wire.  A longwire 4 wavelengths long has twice
>the gain of a dipole.  Care must be used in matching
>the longwire to the antenna; a tuner is frequently
>needed.  As always, a lightning arrestor is a must.
>
>Reference: ARRL Antenna Book, 12th Edition, P.172.

    Of course, the majority of the contents of the ARRL
    handbook are intended towards people who have
    trancievers, and not just receivers.  In such
    a case a tuner may well be required.  In the case
    of receive only, it may not be.  FYI, I am
    currently using a tuner with balun for recieve,
    but I'm not sure if it's buying me anything.
--
Robert Allen, rja@sun.com		DISCLAIMER: I said it, not my company.
		    Samuel Addams: Brewer, Patriot.															        "The right to brew beer is the right to be free!" - me
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
From: wdp@gagme.chi.il.us (Bill Pfeiffer)
Subject: Thanks to all for LISTSRV address
Originator: @gagme
Organization: Gagme Public Access UNIX, Chicago, Illinois.
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 00:06:16 GMT


A big net-thanks to the several people who sent info on the SWL
mailinglist address.

I apreciate it.

William
From: klg@panda.mc.duke.edu (Kim Greer -- rjj)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: Re: BBC Phone-in.
Date: 18 Dec 92 12:24:54 GMT
Organization: Duke University, Nuclear Medicine

In article <SWL$L%92121414105761@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU> CMORRISO@SNYESCVA.BITNET writes:
>
>        I would like to see as many people as possible ask why there should
>not be internet or orther (or hopefully several) email addresses to the
>World Service.  I would like to see at least an Internet connection or
>
>        One address would be for sending reception reports, maybe another

>                                                Chris Morrison

  At least superficially, this sounds like a Good Thing (tm).  Being the
cynic that I am, I have to ask why anyone would expect to get an electronic
reply from the BBC, when they rarely even respond when you take the time to
(hardcopy) write them?  I realize they must get tens of millions of letters
a year, possibly even more than Craig Shergold, so it is no wonder they
don't reply to paper mail.  Any additional avenue of communication would
likely to get the same reponse.  With unemployment in the UK high (at least
according to news media), this would be a place where people could be put to
work almost immediately.  Just think, you might even be able to get QSL's
from them.

kg

-- 
Kim L. Greer                       
Duke University Medical Center		 klg@orion.mc.duke.edu
Div. Nuclear Medicine  POB 3949		 voice: 919-681-5894
Durham, NC 27710  		         fax: 919-681-5636
From: crawford@titan.ksc.nasa.gov (David E. Crawford)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: unID MEDFER on 1633.5 KHz
Date: 15 Dec 92 08:43:19 EST
Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center

This morning around 1150 GMT I heard a MEDFER (medium freq experimental radio)
beacon on 1633.5 khz IDing as "R" on CW mode.  Signal strength was poor. 
Anyone know the location of this one?  From my location (near Cape Canaveral)
and given that these beacons are limited to 100 milliwatts, I would guess this
is on the Atlantic coast in the southeast US somewhere.  "ABC" from Hilton
Head, SC, was also audible faintly on 1643.5 at the same time.

David.

Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
From: kmarko@hpbs654.boi.hp.com (Kurt Marko)
Subject: Re: Perferred "Look & Feel" of radio tuning dials
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 20:39:22 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard / Boise, Idaho
Keywords: radio, analog, digital

I got a shortwave when I was a kid, and still have it today, that has
a dial unlike any I've seen before.  It's an old (~25 years) Panasonic
6-band radio (SW, MW, AM, FM, Air, VHF; don't remember the exact freq.
cutoffs), where each band is a separate side of a hexagon.  When you
change bands, you mechanically turn the dial cylinder so that the next
band is visible through a window on the front of the unit.

Top view.			Front view.

	vhf
    am	---			---
       /   \ air		| |
    fm \   / mw			|+| <--- tuning slider
        ---			| |
	sw			---

The dial is white plastic with black markings, and internally lighted.
Tuning is accomplished by moving a slider vertically on the dial.
This setup is the most readable analog tuner I've ever encountered,
and I've never seen anything else quite like it.  (I'll admit, though,
it would be touch to implement with more bands).

Kurt Marko
From: DPALIK@CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU
Subject: WANTED:  NRD 525
Date: 15 Dec 1992 18:09:56 -0700 (MST)
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA05547; Tue, 15 Dec 92 17:10:05 -0800
X-Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA26358; Tue, 15 Dec 92 17:10:04 -0800
X-Received: from CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU by CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU (PMDF #2381 ) id
 <01GSCR3ZGTQE8ZGQWX@CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU>; Tue, 15 Dec 1992 18:09:56 MST
X-To: rec.radio.shortwave.usenet
X-Envelope-To: rec.radio.shortwave.usenet@decwrl.dec.com
X-Vms-To: IN%"rec.radio.shortwave.usenet@decwrl.dec.com"
X-Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT

I'm looking for a used JRC NRD 525 receiver, preferably with computer
control.  If you have one, or know of one for sale, please e-mail me
and I'll reply right away.  Thanks.
dpalik@ccit.arizona.edu          --- Don Palik
From: patrick.mcdonald@f605.n713.z3.fido.zeta.org.au (Patrick McDonald)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: Shortwave frequencies of Radio South Africa
Organization: Fidonet. Gate admin is fido@socs.uts.edu.au
Date: 13 Dec 92 19:56:10 GMT

Original to: Sp2@Cec1.Wustl.Edu

              CHANNEL AFRICA-ENGLISH BROADCAST SCHEDULE
     Technology Operations PO Box 6, Honeydew 2040, SOUTH AFRICA
                  Valid Sept.6th-Nov.1st, 1992


All times UTC
0200-0400 E + C AFR  11745
0300-0500 S AFR      7270
0400-0600 W AFR      15430
0600-0700 W AFR      15430
1000-1100 E AFR      17780
1100-1200 C AFR      11900
1600-1800 AFR        5960, 15430


AFRIKAANS STEREO (Domestic Station)
0300-0500  4810
0500-1600  9665
1630-2300  4810



RADIO ORION (Domestic Station)
2300-0300  4810


RADIO ORANJE (Domestic Station)
0300-0500  3230
0515-1615  9630
1620-2200  3230

---


--- msged 2.07
 * Origin: SHORTWAVE POSSUMS: Why CHESS & SWL anyway?! (3:713/605)
From: patrick.mcdonald@f605.n713.z3.fido.zeta.org.au (Patrick McDonald)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: World War II listening
Organization: Fidonet. Gate admin is fido@socs.uts.edu.au
Date: 11 Dec 92 19:55:50 GMT

Original to: Am815@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu
Hi there, Am815@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu. On Dec 04, you wrote:

 -}Can someone tell me about the history of this monitoring - I'd enjoy
 -}hearing especially if anyone has first hand knowledge, or can point me to
 -}sources about this.  I'll post a summary of any Email responses I get
here
 -}later. 

Read Arthur Cushen's THE WORLD IN MY EARS, in which he outlines the regular
monitoring done in New Zealand (and elsewhere) of Japanese and German
shortwave broadcasts containing POW information.

                         Patrick
 

--- msged 2.07
 * Origin: SHORTWAVE POSSUMS: Why CHESS & SWL anyway?! (3:713/605)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
From: carter@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Carter Bennett)
Subject: Re: hi frequency
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 20:39:13 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <106@sunriv.UUCP> ronh@sunriv.UUCP (Ronnie Hughes) writes:
>>>  What is the formula for calculating the length of
>>> random wire? 
>   ^^^^^^
>
>	l = [3.1415 (A) + 3.58 (B) - 1.2 (C / D)](0.95)
>
>	Where:
>
>	A = Number of fleas on my dog at the present monent,
>	B = Current time in seconds, 
>	C = Amount of change in my pocket, and
>	D = The current temperature in Austin.
>
>This should give you a nice random length.  Units can be 
>varied as desired to add the the random nature. :-)

Sounds like a good formula - but you're going to get too much email asking
the current state of your dog!  Perhaps other users may wish to adopt another
variable in place of A!  ;-)

Carter R. Bennett, Jr. - Scientist | "Oh my God!  I _AM_ a nerd!!!"
carter@scilab.lonestar.org - home  | - C. Bennett, Sept 25, 1992, after
carter@cmptrc.lonestar.org - work  | realizing he had been talking about
KI5SR          | market availability of "preconfigured" Toll-House cookies.
From: patrick.mcdonald@f605.n713.z3.fido.zeta.org.au (Patrick McDonald)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: PYONGYANG QSL
Organization: Fidonet. Gate admin is fido@socs.uts.edu.au
Date: 15 Dec 92 08:44:12 GMT


My latest verie from North Korea arrived last week after two years (and one
follow up), including a slightly out-of-date program schedule and a book on
a Korean wrestler! I know quite a few of you are interested in hearing from
Pyongyang, so thought this might be of interest. It's my 5th QSL from them
in ten years.

              Regards,

                Patrick
 

--- msged 2.07
 * Origin: SHORTWAVE POSSUMS: Why CHESS & SWL anyway?! (3:713/605)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
From: paulb@harley.tti.com (Paul Blumstein)
Subject: Re: question on phone antenna
Organization: Black Belt Motorcyclists Association
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:41:14 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.155744.20174@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> babu@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Natarajan Sureshbabu) writes:
+Hello,
+I have a few questions regarding the construction of
+an antenna using a phone wire as posted by someone
+on the net.
+
+1) Why do we use passive filters? and not active?
+
+This question popped up when I found that RadioShack
+does not store inductors. We can build filters with
+the same characteristics using Op Amps and capacitors
+alone. Why do we not do that?

Passive filters are less expensive, have little loss
and introduce no distortion.

+2)Why is the filter symmetric? i.e why do we have 
+something like
+
+----||---------||---------||-----
+	|		|
+	}		}
+	}		}
+	|		|
+___________________________________
+
+instead of
+
+
+----||----------||----------------
+	|		|
+	}		}
+	}		}
+	|		|
+__________________________________

And why is there air ?-).  The top filter is known as
a pi filter.  Basically because it looks like the
Greek letter Pi.  The configuration is known for
having the charcterisics that you want in a filter:
especially a non-varying impedance over a wide
frange of pass through frequencies.

+3) Is it possible to build tuning circuits also with
+active elements and capacitors alone? If yes,
+why don't people do so?

Yes.  Active elements introduce cost and distortion.
I am no longer an EE, perhaps a current one (no pun)
will be willing to do it or point to a reference.

____________________________________________________________________________
		Earth: The insane asylum of the Universe
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Paul Blumstein, paulb@harley.tti.com, DoD #36, ABATE, AMA, HOG, KD6LAA
            Transaction Technology, Inc., Santa Monica, CA
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <USR8563A@cbos.uc.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date:         Fri, 18 Dec 1992 15:11:00 +1600
Reply-To:     USR8563A@CBOS.UC.EDU
From:         USR8563A@CBOS.UC.EDU
Subject: Reply: Israeli Broadcasts

     [6B                      KOL ISRAEL WINTER 92-93 SCHEDULE
 Kol Israel Schedule     From November 1, 1992 till  March 27, 1993
 0500   9435              N.A. W.E.
 1100   17545                  W.E.
 1400   17575 15640 11603 N.A. W.E. 17590 West. N.A.  15650 Austral Asia
 1800   11587 7465        N.A. W.E. 11675 West. N.A.  17575 Africa
 2000   11587 9435 7465   N.A. W.E. 11675 West. N.A.  11603 Lat. Am. 17575 Af.
 2230   11603 11587 7465  N.A. W.E. 11675 West. N.A.  17575 9435 Latin America
 Reshet Bet (Hebrew) domestic service relay
 0400-2300                    15615 13753 9388
 0400-0455 & 0530-0610        9435
 0615-1050 & 1205-1355        17545
Shai, are you related to Nissim Mor.
  [5B
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
From: bz649@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Kenneth V Zichi)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Subject: Re: am or ssb
Date: 12 Dec 1992 18:51:33 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


]lingr1000@ucsvax.sdsu.edu (ZHANG Z) asks:
  >if the sync feature on sony 2010 and the like are just convenience
  >feature that can be easily done on a radio with ssb.  that is, if
  >ssb reception solves the problem both of interchannel interference 
  >and fading.
 
Sort of....
  The 2010's sync detector (but NOT all of them!) will select one 
side band or the other just as tuning in LSB or USB will, and
allows you to pick which sideband you listen to (meaning you
can choose the one that is less affected by splatter QRM).
  Similarly, but locking onto and supplanting the carrier, the
Sync detector eliminates the problems with SELECTIVE fading
(but *NOT* "pure" fading!) just as replacing the carrier with
the BFO used in SSB detection does.  
  BUT  the sync detector has the very great advantage of NOT
requiring a "safecracker's touch" to tune the station, and 
especially in sets like the 2010 that only tune in .1 kHz
steps, it allows fine control of where the carrir is placed, so
you don't end up with the "donald duck" effect when a station
isn't located exactly on a .1 kHz step.  In essence, you can
do a lot of the same sort of things with ECSSB reception,
but it isn't nearly as convenient, and it usually won't sound
as good either.
-- 
73  //kv zichi  bz649@Cleveland.FreeNet.edu 
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
From: mellob@cary104.its.rpi.edu (Daffy Duck)
Subject: Galaxy V
Reply-To: mellob@rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 21:40:53 GMT


		I'm looking for mods (serious mods)  for channeling, unlocking

		the RIT, higher output transistors (or peaking procedures), and 

		will it support FM. Please post or email, thanks in advance.

		-Brett        mellob@rpi.edu

 

Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Recommendations for a QUALITY mobile CB? 
Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Gannett Technologies Group
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 19:03:13 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.012202.16223@nmsu.edu> dtasman@NMSU.edu (Dan Tasman) writes:
>
>No, I plan to use 10m _with_ a license, after I master the Morse Code and  
>upgrade to a Tech Plus license.  I wonder what CB is doing at 27 MHz if an  
>international treaty requires ham operators to have knowledge of code to use  
>frequencies under 30MHz ... is Citizens Band radio excepted? 

CB is a personal *business* band, or at least it was intended to be that
when CB was created. Business band licensees don't need no stinkin' code
tests, neither do broadcasters, or the military, or any other class of 
license, now including shipboard operators, *except* for amateur operators, 
the kings of the obsolete. 

Gary KE4ZV
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
From: wvogel@MtHolyoke.edu (keeper of the tone)
Subject: Re: Mods for Realistic :)
Organization: Mount Holyoke College
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 20:00:07 GMT

where in the world do you think your going to use that radio????????
fact is most RS radio pll's wont allow a freq spread that you are looking
for or do fm with out serious modifacations to the ckts
if you have the 10 mtr RS unit i have been led to beleive that it cannot
be modified to go out of band

wayne
AJ0AE
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
Subject: Re: 5W CB radio in USA?
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 00:26:23 GMT

myers@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Bob Myers) writes:
: > > 
: > I thought it was done with a two-toned audio signal applied to the input 
: > (after the audio circuits have been aligned)...with the audio gain set to 
: > a known level, the SSB circuits (at least in my Uniden AX144, and my 
: > Cobra 142GTL) should then have peak power out...aligning the correct tank 
: > circuits should bring the power to within spec's, which is what you said 
: > MAX possible output.
: >  
: > That's really the only way of measuring the input power to the RF driver 
: > of a SSB radio, true?
: > 
: 
: Yup, that's it.  Bill forgets that SSB was a permitted mode of operation
: in both the Amateur and CB services long before the "output power" convention
: was adopted; it worked just fine, under the old "DC input to the final
: amplifier" restrictions, since SSB could not use the final as the modulator
: (which wasn't typically done in amateur AM practice, either, but I digress).
: The only problem with this is that it really doesn't show SSB's "real" power,
: as the power of an SSB signal is strongly dependent on the modulating signal,
: unlike that of the AM signal (where 2/3 of the power is in the constant
: carrier component).  The new method of output power doesn't really do justice 
: to SSB either (although it's better than before), but it eliminates questions 
: of output stage efficiency, etc., for better "apples-to-apples" comparisons.

Nope - I did not forget it. I was, and am, well aware of the two-tone test
and how to apply it.

As you say, neither method really measures SSB power, since it is absolutely
dependent on the modulating signal. You can accurately measure peak power and
average power. Neither one actually tells you much about how effective the
SSB signal is going to be.

Bill
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: ming@enel.ucalgary.ca (Yang Ming)
Subject: Re: thanks...
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 19:17:17 GMT
Organization: ECE Department, U. of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

In article <1992Dec15.182215.6863@telesoft.com> hamid@telesoft.com (Hamid Radvar @lone) writes:
>In <1992Dec15.100350.5431@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> c60c-3gi@web-3d.berkeley.edu (Masayuki Karahashi) writes:
>
>
>[stuff deleted]
>
>>	(2) get a Radio Shack TRC-479 (or equivalent from other place) and
>>   	    put that in my car, connecting the power source to the cigarette
>>	    adapter.  
>
>When I try to power up my walkie talkie with the cigarette adapter, I
>get lots of noise when the car is running.  I'd think you might run
>into the same problem unless there is a way to filter out the noise.
>Does anyone know of such filter?
>
>>---Masayuki Karahashi
>>c60c-3gi@web.berkeley.edu
>>"I think its time to change major"
>
>Hamid Radvar

I think you need a choke to filter out the noise. It is better between the cig adapter
and you hand set, because if you put it under the dash, someday you light up a cig, the
choke can be burnt down due the low power handle capacity.

Ming Yang


Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
From: johnw@bluemoon.use.com (John L. Wilkerson Jr.)
Subject: Re: Linears vs. legal system
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[024])
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 92 10:37:46 EST

dans@panix.com (Dan Simoes) writes:

> But when I can get through, people complement me on how nice my radio
> sounds, so it almost makes up for the other times.  Almost ;-)
> 
> FYI, my setup is a Uniden (low end, don't remember model) and a PROPERLY
> TUNED K40 antenna.
> 
 
    About everything Uniden puts out sounds great.  The only exception is 
when someone has one worked on and adds all sorts of nice gadgets.  Hang 
in there, I know how you feel.
 
> Happy CBing, and somebody please report the guy in Jamaica that we can hear
> all the way in Westchester County ("SKIP" :-) )
> 
 
      Probably the same guy I hear in Columbus Ohio
 

--
  ___                      _       _     __  _
 (   >      /            _//      ' )   /   // /
  __/______/_  ____      /         / / / o // /_  _  __  _   ________
 / /  (_) / /_/ / <_    /___ o    (_(_/ <_</_/ <_</_/ (_/_)_(_) / / <_
<_/     johnw@bluemoon.use.com     jwilkerson@delphi.com
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
Subject: Re: I know they are illegal...
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 21:17:28 GMT

gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman) writes:
: In article <1992Dec10.011640.24584@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com> billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:
: >
: >Nope -  you can amplify AM with a linear amplifier, without splatter.
: >The problem is that it is unnecessary. The efficiency is lower, so
: >AM amplifiers are usually class C. 
: 
: Bill! I thought you knew better than this. You can't amplify a *linear*
: modulated signal like AM with a Class C *non-linear* amplifier. All you
: get out is distorted garbage. You have to run Class A or Class AB1 to
: get the modulation sidebands passed through correctly. The thing has
: to be *phase* linear too across it's bandpass or you'll wind up with
: high levels of distortion on the demodulated AM signal.

You are right - twas a slip of the mind. AM or SSB signals must be
amplified using Class A, B, AB1 or (I believe) AB2 amplifiers.

: >: the modulator circuit from the final output, amplify the RF with
: >: a class C amplifier, run the audio to an external class A amplifier/
: >: modulator (equal in audio power to the class C amplifier's input
: >: power) and modulate in your external amplifier.  Clean, high-power
: >: no-fuss AM.  Best, however, done with tube curcuits so that yoiu
: >: can get a reasonable amount of power for the bucks & time invested.
: >
: >This is a crock of bull. There is absolutely no need to amplify the
: >audio and rf separately. I know of no AM amplifiers that do so. It
: >would be unnecessarily complicating a rather simple circuit.
: 
: Nearly *every* high power AM broadcast facility does it this way for
: efficiency reasons. The unmodulated RF is amplified to a high power
: level by Class C stages for high efficiency and the audio is high
: level modulated onto the final amplifier stage using a method called
: plate modulation in tube days and collector modulation in solid
: state transmitters. The only mistake the original poster made was
: in saying that the modulating audio has to be of equal power to the
: RF amplifier. This is incorrect, it only has to equal *half* the power
: of the RF stage.

High powered stations do it that way. However, I didn't think that we
were talking about commercial stations. It is also the most expensive
way, by far, of accomplishing the task. 

Maybe I misread the posting - I read it to state that such a method
was necessary for a clean signal. It isn't.

: (There's another way to get high level AM called Class D switch mode
: modulation, but that advanced topic will be left to another time.)

Yeah. I have never played with such a circuit. I plan to do so some day.

Bill
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
From: dtasman@NMSU.edu (Dan Tasman)
Subject: Mods for Realistic :)
Organization: New Mexico State University
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 22:55:48 GMT

Does anyone have any mods for a Radio Shack Flavoradio?  I want to make it T/R  
from 25MHz to 30MHz, in AM, FM, CW and SSB modes.  Any tune up ideas that would  
allow me to transmit at 100 watts would be apreciated as well. :) 

--
   Dan Tasman                                       dtasman@dante.nmsu.edu
                                                     molson@rever.nmsu.edu
   -----------------------------------------------------------------------
   "I think that I shall never see a billboard lovely as a tree
    Indeed, unless the billboards fall, I'll never see a tree at all."
                                                                Ogden Nash