HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (Bakayaroo Banzai)
Subject: Re: Bond books and movies
Organization: Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum GmbH, Hamburg
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 09:31:52 GMT

In article <1if5pmINNj2p@transfer.stratus.com> jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com writes:
>In article <1993Jan6.165144.2986@b8.b8.ingr.com>  
>anthony@panzer.b17b.ingr.com (Anthony Shipman) writes:
>> |> 
>> |> BTW - During their recent James Bond week, TNT showed the  
>original 1 
>> |> hour long TV version of Casino Royale that was shown as a live  
>show in 
>> |> the 50s (1956 I believe).  It starred Barry Nelson as James (and 
>> |> included Peter Lorre as the villan). So, technically, I guess  
>you could 
>> |> say Casino Royale was made as a "serious" production.
>> 
>> I don't know how serious you can call it, since James Bond was an  
>American and
>> everyone kept refering to him as "Jimmy."
>
>Wrong movie.  You are thinking of the movie version of Casino Royale,
>which starred Woody Allen, among others.  The previous
>poster was referering to a much older TV version of the book,
>which TNT unearthed somehow.
>
And let me be real nit-picky and mention that in the movie version
of "Casino Royale" James Bond was played by David Niven who was not
referred to as "Jimmy". Woody Allen played his American *nephew*,
"Jimmy" Bond. And anyone attempting to attach serious discussion
to the film version will be tied up and forced to watch "Hullabaloo!"
while girls in flourescent yellow mini-skirts, see-through plastic
halter tops, and green go-go boots frug shamelessly just on the edges
of his peripheral vision...:)


*******************************************************************************
*  "Supernatural, perhaps...Baloney, perhaps not" - Bela Lugosi               *
*******************************************************************************
Matt Marchese	    The opinions expressed here are not those of my employer, *
Cray Research  	    my wife, my church, or myself...But they are the opinions *
DKRZ                of Elvis as revealved to me through the medium of my pet  *
Hamburg, Germany    hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...                             *
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: barrus@cod.nosc.mil
Subject: Re: The Weird List (Dali)
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, CA
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 15:55:58 GMT


In article <1993Jan7.040457.6054@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca> usenet@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca writes:
>>The list of weird, eccentric and original movies (more or less) has
>>swelled to more than a hundred.  If you know of any that belong there,
>>please post.  And also, if you have seen any of the movies in the list,
>>...
>
>
>Leolo (4) 
>Un Chien Andalou (b&w silent) (Salvador Dali and L. Buneul) (4)


Salvador Dali was into films??  I had no idea.  All I can
say is that it must be bizarre.

JDB
From: dragel@sqhilton.pc.cs.cmu.edu.ogi.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: PEEVES at MOVIE THEATERS !
Date: 8 Jan 93 14:41:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.C0JI5G.FMF.2
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Originator: dragel@sqhilton.pc.cs.cmu.edu

More peeves:

*when the copy of the film is bad (scratchy, etc.)

*when the projectionist doesn't have the film focused, sound
adjusted, etc.

*when the sound from the movie in an adjoining theatre is turned
up so loud that it interferes with what you're seeing

--cheryl
dragel@sqhilton.pc.cs.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jpehko@cs.joensuu.fi (Juha Pehkonen)
Subject: Re: Lenigrad Cowboys Go America
Keywords: strange
Organization: University of Joensuu
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 12:46:39 GMT

reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher) writes:
>It was directed (and, I believe, written) by Aki Kaurismakki, one of the
>two Kaurismakki brothers who direct films.  Aki K. is the more highly

Just to get the facts straight, it's Kaurismaki.

>one of his weird films.  Another of his films, "The Match Factory
>Girl", was runner up as best foreign language film in a couple of recent
>U.S. critics polls.  It's a much more naturalistic story of a very plain
>working girl who gets pregnant by a slightly glamorous guy who turns out
>to be a turd.  (I personally thought it was a depressing bore.)

I'm sure a lot of people agree with you on that. "The Match Factory Girl"
is probably his worst movie (IMO) so I'm surprised to hear it even got
nominated. "Leningrad Cowboys Go To America" is his second worst :-) Not
that I've seen them all, but those two aren't really good examples of his
work.  

Juha Pehkonen
jpehko@cs.joensuu.fi

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: damiel@netcom.com (Paul Theodoropoulos)
Subject: Re: Coppola's DRACULA
X-Spook-Fodder: hero heroin tree shrub bush birth life death FBI CIA NSA
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 06:48:21 GMT

In <C0pzx4.5Fr@news.iastate.edu> s1mbm@isuvax.iastate.edu (michael bruce mcdonald) writes:

>Given how very *little* your initial response to Nilges had to *say*, this
>long-winded defense sounds quite bonkers, quite absolutely raving out-of-
>this-world NUTS, dude.



	<deep bow>


-- 
paul theodoropoulos     damiel@netcom.com     (hooools@well.sf.ca.us)

"Those who will trade essential liberty for promise of security will have
 neither" - Benjamin Franklin
From: aze@first.gmd.de (Andre' Zehl)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Lenigrad Cowboys Go America
Keywords: strange
Date: 11 Jan 93 15:16:53 GMT

jpehko@cs.joensuu.fi (Juha Pehkonen) writes:

>reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher) writes:
>>one of his weird films.  Another of his films, "The Match Factory
>>Girl", was runner up as best foreign language film in a couple of recent
>>U.S. critics polls.  It's a much more naturalistic story of a very plain
>>working girl who gets pregnant by a slightly glamorous guy who turns out
>>to be a turd.  (I personally thought it was a depressing bore.)

>I'm sure a lot of people agree with you on that. "The Match Factory Girl"
>is probably his worst movie (IMO) so I'm surprised to hear it even got
>nominated. "Leningrad Cowboys Go To America" is his second worst :-) Not

Leningrad Cowboys is a really low-budget movie. Kaurismaki casted the movie
by drving with a small team through the US, they looked for places for
a good cast and would eventually employ people from the streets for the movie. 
Kaurismaki would go into a restaurant, ask the barkeeper if he would mind
having a movie cast in his establishment, the barkeeper would agree and
Kaurismaki whistled that his team could come in... 

Two other (new) Kausrismakis are "Zombie and the Ghosttrain" (by
Mika Kaurismaki) and "Life of the Bohemians"  (don't know if that's the
english title), which is a great movie that takes place in Paris. 

--
Andre'_________________________________________________________________________
	 			      crusoe@cs.tu-berlin.de [aze@first.gmd.de]
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: damiel@netcom.com (Paul Theodoropoulos)
Subject: Re: Coppola's DRACULA
X-Spook-Fodder: hero heroin tree shrub bush birth life death FBI CIA NSA
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 06:55:01 GMT

In <1993Jan9.050808.18544@Princeton.EDU> egnilges@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Edward G. Nilges) writes:
>Of course it was brainless.  But you make no attempt to engage its messages
>in any critical sense, meaning that they continue to work on your
>subconscious.  For example, the statement you make "I nearly barfed on
>my [putatively female] companion" expresses a lot of repressed hostility and
>aggression and indeed is a Dracula-like desire to infect a woman with your
>bodily fluids.  

i must admit that this is quite possibly the most offensive piece of
pseudo-intellectual bilge i have ever had the displeasure to read.

Mr. Nilges, you would do well to come out of your ivory tower and learn
a little humanity. 

and pseudo-intellectuals wonder why there is so much hostility expressed
towards them.

extraordinary.


"Clever People and Grocers: they *weigh* everything..."

-Zorba

-- 
paul theodoropoulos     damiel@netcom.com     (hooools@well.sf.ca.us)

"Those who will trade essential liberty for promise of security will have
 neither" - Benjamin Franklin
From: d_headl@pavo.concordia.ca (D. H.)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Most Overrated Actor/Actress
Date: 4 Jan 93 09:39:00 GMT
Organization: Concordia University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1579@ozz.oasis.icl.co.uk>, dvp@oasis.icl.co.uk (Dave Parry) writes...
>Julia Roberts!!!!
> 
>Legs, hair and makeup. Take those away and there's nothing left.
> 
>Dave

Do not forget those collagen filled lips!
Another Dave.
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Movies you were forced to see
Date: 8 Jan 93 16:33:47 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

In article <1993Jan8.144038.978@b8.b8.ingr.com>, anthony@panzer.b17b.ingr.com 
(Anthony Shipman) writes:

> I was an usher at a theater back in 1982 when a Sean Connery movie called 
> "Wrong is Right" came out. This movie is FANTASTIC. It's a biting satire 
> in which Connery plays this Peter Arnett-type super-TV-reporter who gets 
> involved with a plot where a Middle Eastern Dictator gets hold of some 
> nuclear weapons and wants to terrorize the world, so the U.S. ends up going 
> to war against him. 

Yep, this movie was shown on television just this week in the Philadelphia
area.  At first I couldn't believe that was Sean Connery in a movie I had
never even heard of.  To be honest, I didn't watch much of the movie and
can't really give an educated opinion, but I did see one scene where women
were parachuting over the capital then blowing themselves up.  Huh?

I also caught an appearance of Sean on the Australian comedy/talk-show 
starring Dame Enda.  He seemed pretty amused to be there, and was asked
questions about embarassing topics like when he posed nude for an college
art class.

The best exchange was Dame Edna asked about the scene in _Dr.No_ when there
was a spider crawling up his body.  Another guest chimed in with a snappy
comment that was rather amusing:

Sean: "Truth to tell that was actually a stunt-man."

Cliff: "It looked alot like a spider to me!"

Enda: "How *did* that stunt-man get into that spider costume?"

Greg Bole                        "Once the world trembled at the sound of our
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu      rockets, now they will tremble at the sound
                                  of our silence.  The order is: Engage the
                                  Catapiller Drive!"
                                    Sean Connery in _The Hunt for Red October_
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: 1992 Movies that will continue to be popular
Date: 6 Jan 93 17:40:21 GMT
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department

In article <1993Jan6.124951.24408@ils.nwu.edu> mccoy@ils.nwu.edu (Jim Mccoy) writes:
>While everyone is making lists of the "best" films of 1992, I thought I
>would throw out a slight twist to that question and see what people think:
>
>Which films released this year will continue to be popular over the next
>decade? 
>
>Of the 1992 films, Wayne's World is certain to capture the same group that
>seems to keep Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure going.  On the other hand,
>I doubt Alladin will have the same long-term success that Beauty and the
>Beast (not a 92 film, but one that will remain popular) will have.

Interesting, as I'd thought "Wayne's World" immediately when you mentioned
the notion of films that are popular now but won't be in ten years.  It
seems to me that this film is so loaded with the youth references of today
that, ten years from now, it will seem terribly outdated.  "Bill and Ted's
Excellent Adventure" is a bit less that way, I think, as cool references
and in slang come and go, but stupidity is forever.

The danger for "Aladdin" isn't ten years from now.  It will continue to
be popular at least that long.  The danger is more like thirty years from
now.  Most studios don't give a damn how popular a film will be in 30
years, but Disney does, at least for its animated films.  For the next
decade or so, the topical references in "Aladdin" will still be sufficiently
topical as to be good jokes.  Thirty years from now, they won't, and some
of them will be completely forgotten.  The film may survive, nevertheless,
on its high quality animation and high energy vocal performance by Robin
Williams.  Groucho made topical jokes that few understand today, but his
manic energy still makes him funny.

-- 
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu
From: matthew@spica.bu.edu (Matthew Fox)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Movies you were forced to see
Date: 8 Jan 93 16:04:43 GMT
Followup-To: Wrong is Right
Organization: Information Technology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Originator: matthew@spica.bu.edu




   anthony@panzer.b17b.ingr.com (Anthony Shipman) mentioned the movie
Wrong is Right, with Sean Connery, as being a "sleeper" worth seeing.

   I'd echo that. I caught it on Australian TV in 1986 (I think) (it may
even have had a different title), and taped it for no other reason than
I think Sean Connery is pretty good. But the whole movie was very
entertaining in that satirical way, and I wound up watching the thing
often. By all means, catch this film.
-- 
Matthew W. Fox        :          Exile from the Wide Brown Land
Center for Space Physics,  Boston University
matthew@spica.bu.edu  : Another walnut-sized contribution to the Brain Drain

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Lady Johanna Constantine)
Subject: Re: Movies you were forced to see
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 04:30:56 GMT

My Da gets really pissed when my sister and I go see a movie
without him, so he used to get his revenge by choosing a film
HE wanted to see, adn then draggign us to the 1$ theatre 45 minutes
away to see them.  Here's the list.

Top Gun (My reply "No planes!  I don't care if you were in the RAF.
NO PLANES!) but I ended up amused by it.  I was all of 12 I think.

Amadeus (he saw the play.  Dragged us.  I enjoyed it, but not as much as
I did when I saw it on video years later.  Can you believe that at one
point they cast Kenneth Branagh as Motzart?)

Hope and Glory (I thought it woudl be depressing, after what all Da told
me about growing up in the UK after WW@, but I ended up loving it)

Empire of the SUn (hated it.  Still hate it.  Liked Christian Bale in
Henry V tho)

My Left Foot (Loved it.  Want to see it again.)


ANd the one film we EVER agreed upon:  The Feild.  Saw this one in
Madrid last year.  Reading the Spanish subtitles as I listened to the 
Connemara (sp?) idiom adn accents KILLED me.


So, all in all, maybe if he had waited till I ws a little older, I
might have put up less of a fight.

LJC
-- 
Lady Johanna Constantine* Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will
tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu   * endure when mere facts are dust, and ashes, and
Disclaimer - huh?       * forgot.      -Dream of the Endless (and Neil G.)
Church of Our Lady of the Perpetually Clueless, donations accepted......
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re:    Bond books and movies
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 16:51:48 GMT

In article <93005.184742ASNTB@ASUACAD.BITNET> <ASNTB@ASUACAD.BITNET> writes:
>It
>will be interesting to see what title is chosen for the new Bond film set for
>release later this year (last I heard).

MGM/UA has announced that there will be a new Bond film, but they haven't
announced a title, and I believe that they indicated that they haven't
settled the script, yet.  Given the lengthy postproduction time necessary for 
a film of this type, and that they haven't even announced a starting date for 
shooting yet, much less actually shot anything, it's practically impossible 
that the film will come out this year.  Summer 1994 is likely, with Christmas 
1994 also being a possibility, especially if things bog down.  Timothy
Dalton is supposed to star, but, with the shooting still in the indefinite
future, that might change.

-- 
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu
From: dunster@sdsu.edu (mark dunster)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: PEEVES at MOVIE THEATERS !
Date: 9 Jan 1993 00:13:29 GMT
Organization: sdsu
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: mathfp13.sdsu.edu

In article <1993Jan8.213005.1845@Princeton.EDU>, spencer@phoenix.Princeton.EDU 
(S. Spencer Sun) writes:
> 
> >*when the projectionist doesn't have the film focused, sound
> >adjusted, etc.
> >
> 
> These are things that are all very easily rectified.  Go and tell an
> employee to tell the projectionist or whoever to fix the problem.
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 

Isn't it the bloody projectionist's job to make sure that the film is
properly focused?  What the hell does he/she do?  Turn a switch and
fall asleep???  Can't he/she put on his/her bloody glasses and have a 
look to see if the film is focused, whilst checking that (s)he's showing
Terminator II and not Howard the Duck?  Apart from the arseholes 
who baby-sit their two year old screaming brats at the theatre, a badly
focused film is my biggest peeve.  It happens so bloody often it's not
funny.  I really don't like getting up five minutes into a film (disturbing
the people sitting next to me) just to ask the manager to tell the 
projectionist to wake up and do their job.

Terminator II: 100 million dollars of brilliant special effects, put out 
of focus by one arsehole.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rorschak@daimi.aau.dk (Jesper Lauridsen)
Subject: Re: x can't make money
Organization: Exile Government of Bramming
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 17:38:20 GMT

jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Jim Mann) writes:

>Your reasoning sounds good. However, remember that several of
>the biggest blockbusters in history were long movies: Gone
>with the Wind, Ben Hur, The Ten Commandments, Lawrence of Arabia.
>There are others. All of these films are longer than 3 hours, and
>all made tons of money.

And all were hits a long time ago.
-- 
Jesper Lauridsen        | Je ne suis pas un voyou
rorschak@daimi.aau.dk   | Je suis Monsieur Hire 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: ziauddin@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (Tasneem Ziauddin)
Subject: _Return of Martin Guerre_ question
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 14:06:02 GMT

In the credits at the end I thought I saw the name of the actor who played
Nikita's supervisor/instructor, Bob, in _La Femme Nikita_.  I think his name
is Tcheko Karyo (sp?).  Was he is _RMG_?  If so, whom did he play?  What
else has he been in and what nationality is he?

Thanks in advance.
From: tdavis@cse.unl.edu (Todd Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Cannes Film Festival winners list (anyone?)
Date: 11 Jan 1993 09:15:36 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska--Lincoln	
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: cse.unl.edu
Keywords: Cannes FF, Best Picture awards

Does anybody out there have a list of Best Picture winners at the Cannes
Film Festival from its inception to the present date?  I know it dates at
least back into the '50s and would love to possibly find some older gems.

 
tdavis@cse.unl.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mlh@eddy.austin.ibm.com (Mike Haskell)
Subject: Re: Movies you were forced to see
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 21:24:37 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <1993Jan5.212108.11802@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> carlos@spanky.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Carlos Carrion) writes:
>In article <1993Jan5.115053.2470@vixvax.mgi.com> eiswirth@vixvax.mgi.com (Steve Eiswirth) writes:
>>I know I'm not alone as someone who was forced/guilted into seeing a movie

[stuff deleted]

>
>	The Bad News Bears.  terrible movie.
	
I was dragged kicking and screaming by my wife to see TBNB.  I really enjoyed
it.  I never had so many gut laughs.  I loved their sponser : Chico's Bail 
Bonds - "Let Freedom Ring".
From: adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: TU for TOUS
Date: 12 Jan 1993 11:00:56 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: mizar.usc.edu

In article <1993Jan12.144629.26978@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> 
blake7@herahera.cc.bellcore.com (berardinelli,james) writes:
> As has already been pointed out, I mistakenly called TOUS LES MATINS...
> TU LES MATINS...

[ self-debasement deleted ]

> Once again, my profuse apologies.

Dear me.  A simple "Ooops!" would have sufficed, 
you know.  Well, just don't let it happen again.

Arne
From: smah@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Steve Mah)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jackie Chan on Discovery Channel
Date: 4 Jan 93 20:43:02 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <1572s__@rpi.edu> spinaa@rpi.edu (Matt Garretson) writes:

>How many episodes are there of Incredibly Strange Movies? I've only seen a

Sorry- not a reply 8-(  but when is this show on?

Thanks in advance...

-- 
*  Steve Mah                             smah@sdcc13.ucsd.EDU *
*							      *
*                    "Is it safe?"                            *
***************************************************************
From: a0s5108@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Neal and Mara Priestly)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Appologia
Date: 11 Jan 1993 08:49:48 -0500
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
NNTP-Posting-Host: titan.ucc.umass.edu

Just re-read my follow up to Mr Bendiksen (SP?).

Maybe I shouldn't post until after I finish withdrawal from cigs.

If I was offending to anyone, my appologies.  I did not mean to 
come off quite so combative, and I feel my points may have been
lost in it.  Bad day, and every cell screaming for nicotene.

-Neal

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jdliss@unix.amherst.edu (Jeff Liss)
Subject: Re: Alien Boxed Set Revelations
Organization: Amherst College
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 19:29:06 GMT

Mark,

Well, all you say about why that scene was cut from the movie is right -- it 
was a matter of pacing.  But I think to make a case for a consistent concept
of the alien life cycle is a little naive.  The sequel was not planned -- I'm
not saying it was wrong of Cameron to change things around, but I believe
the whole consistency is a myth.  As you point out, the interviews make it
very clear that the alien was short-lived, expressed in the movie through
the darkening of its skin (exoskeleton, whatever).  This implication is 
that it really can only live for several days -- unlike the aliens in the
second movie who seem to have waited around for quite a while to ambush the
Marines.  Obviously the whole idea of a queen wasn't around in the first
movie -- after all, where did all those eggs in the derelict ship come from?
One can match the second movie's ideas to those of the first, and
you make a good case here.  But the holes do need to be filled in if it's
going to make sense.  I think the absence of that scene from the theatrical
release makes alot more room in a concept of the life cycle for Cameron's
ideas without the idea of a queenless, "bootstrapping" mode of reproduction.

The third movie tries to take things a little farther, although it is less
clear just how different this alien is supposed to be.  But you do get a
baby-alien that is expressly identified as a queen.

Jeff
From: wsbusup2@rw8.urc.tue.nl (Boudewijn Wayers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Help needed on movie quotes
Keywords: quotes
Date: 5 Jan 93 15:26:32 GMT
Reply-To: wsbusup2@urc.tue.nl

I am working on a puzzle in a local newspaper for which I need the
origins of a few movie quotes.
The quotes are:

"I'm mad as hell and I'm ot gonna take this any longer"

"I could have been a contender, but I ended up being a bum"

"Is that a gun you're carrying or are you just happy to see me?"

"You talkin' to me?"

If you know one or more answers please let me know via e-mail.

Thanks in advance, Boudewijn Wayers.