From: hporopudas@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi
Subject: Re: STRUCTURE OF TIME (at numerous requests)
Followup-To: sci.philosophy.tech
Organization: Nokia Telecommunications.
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 10:51:33 GMT


In article <37260@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu>, jfh@reef.cis.ufl.edu
(James F. Hranicky) writes:
> In article <1992Sep30.092352.1@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi>
hporopudas@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi writes:
>
>>    Unfortunately scientists teach to ordinary peoples presisely what they
>>  talk in private or in public situations all around the world. Ordinary
>>  peoples respect all their words (mostly without any criticism).
>>    This is why these 'wise teachers' are fully responsible for all their
>>  words they have 'teached' to ordinary peoples.
>>
>
> Obviously, these "ordinary people" are fully not responsible for their
> acceptance or non-acceptance of any "scientific" doctrine, eh? There
> are plenty of scientist who can find the middle ground between science
> and religion, and for those who don't: If you don't like what they say,
> don't pay attention to it. The advances in science and technology prove
> that gee, something must be right about these doctrines, right?
>
> Science merely attempts to find the truth through verifyable means, and
> of those things which cannot be proved or disproved, science is silent.
> The scientists themselves are free to believe what they want to after this
> point, but laying the responsibility for anyone elses acceptance of
> scientists' beliefs on the scientists themsevles is unwarranted. Do you
> categorically reject the scientific method?
>

    Experimental scientific methods are difficult when we are treating
  time-like singularities and space-like singularities of general relativity
  which tries to describe initial singularities of our standard model of
  universe. This is due that we don't even know what kind of physical laws
  possible holds in so extreme conditions.
    In the model of universe, which I proposed in my article 'Structure of
  Time' time-like singularities, which must occur within the past of every
  point at an early time when the density was high, are avoided with aid of
  'diamond'-concept (of course this 'diamond' is not a ordinary diamond).
  Space-like singularity is avoided with aid of 'ball'-concept (earth-ball
  like huge massive ball is formed from 'diamonds', radius about 8 km, mass
  about 10 power 50 kg), which lies in center of space (this mass is in
  center of Virgo Cluster, (H-M)).
    Scientific methods possibly indicate existence of this huge mass
  (possible effect is these quantized redshifts of distant galaxies, if
  this phenomena of quantization of red-shifts is real).
    Scientific methods indicate also existence of gamma-ray bursts coming
  uniformly from every direction from the sky and this possible also
  indicate existence of 'radiation peripheries', which separates positive
  mass part and negative mass part of universe and which is also related to
  time's structure.
    When something touches to exotic particles called 'space-potato' then
  it may explode and considerable 'flash of lightning' results (this exotic
  particle formed from positive mass and negative mass neutrinos (7+7, and
  always three together, neutrinos related to electron) was a fine structure
  detail in 'radiation periphery'. 'Diamond' was also formed from one
  'radiation periphery').


> Do you commit blasphemy by using this network created by science?
>
> Jim Hranicky (jfh@reef.cis.ufl.edu)

    No, not in any name. I don't understand her role in some accurate citations
  from her talk. On the other hand she says also that the Highest is very
  bright and heavy giant, Who is in the negative-mass part of universe.
    She was only 5 years old when she drew her drawings and spoke these matters.
  These are all matters which we will never understand.

    ---Hannu.


  "There does not exist 'mathematical' time-like and space-like singularities
   in the real physical universe."

Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech