HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ranfry@mala.proteus.qc.ca (Ranfry)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Offline Readers
Date: 27 Dec 92 09:53:22 GMT
Organization: Mala's Refuge, Montreal, Canada

In <FDyDwB1w165w@fennec.com> dfox@fennec.com (Scott Davis) writes:
>I have seen several messages about offline or alternitive mail/news
>readers for Waffle. But let it be known that there is one called
>Hell-Diver. This is a Windows 3.1 reader ONLY for Waffle.
>I am hard to please when it comes to offline readers. But I must
>say that this is THE best one by far. You don't even ever have to
>login to your system. It has all the uuencode/decode, compression, 
>security, etc...that you'll ever need. I would highly recommend
>this to ANYONE running Waffle 1.65 under Windows. You can pick
>it up via FTP from halcyon.com. Awesome is simply not the word for
>it. Take a look at it. I am sure you'll be pleased.

>-------------------
>Scott Davis <dfox@fennec.com> // Domain Administrator // Will Work For Food
>Fennec Information Systems - Oribital Data Haven II - Austin, Texas
>-------------------

Yes, Hell diver is VERY good, but it is NOT an offline reader system.  
It does NOT allow the system's users to download all new messages and mail, 
read them offline, compose replies offline, and then upload them the next
time they call.  THAT is what is needed.  Helldiver, while very good, is 
only usefull for those who can log on from the BBS computer, as the sysop 
does.


-- 
=========================================================================
Internet: Ranfry@mala.proteus.qc.ca     |   I was going to put
Genie:    M.Lombart1                    |   something witty here,
UUCP:     uunet!proteus!mala!ranfry     |   but could think of nothing
Mala's Refuge (514)748-8070             |   so I won't bother!
=========================================================================
From: abolins%visavis.uucp@nyongwa.cam.org (August Abolins)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: BBStevie v2.0
Date: 18 Dec 92 16:09:46 GMT
Organization: Vis-a-Vis Communications [Ontario+Quebec]

rat@ruth.UUCP (David Douthitt) writes:

> I'm getting fed up with the buffer overload that I get everytime I try
> to do an ASCII upload... this is one *TINY* buffer.  And once the
> upload is under way, there is NO way to stop it.  I just have to sit
> and wait... and wait... and wait... for it to all come crashing
> through.

What communications program do you use for remote operation?  Most good
comm programs allow you to control the speed of ascii uploads. For
example, Crosstalk allows one to set the "Lwait" parameter, this
specifies the number of seconds to wait after sending carriage-return
before sending the next line of text.  It also allows one to set a
"Cwait" parameter, this specifies the number of milliseconds between
successive characters.

Telemate is another fine comm program that allows one to set
"LinePacing" and "CharPaciing" for ascii uploads.

Hope this helps.


---  /|ugust /|bolins  --------------[ abolins%visavis@nyongwa.cam.org ]---
From: steveh@grafex.Cupertino.CA.US (Steve Harding KA6ETB)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Problems with nwreader and helldiver
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 93 17:54:48 -0800
Organization: The GRAFex Company

root@rebell.rmt.sub.org (Gottfried Hamm) writes:

> I have two problems with nwreader and helldiver:
]...[
> 2. In helldiver under Windows 3.1 I never see the contents of the newsgroups
>    neither using join nor newsrc.

Be sure HD is in your ~\waffle\bin directory, not your ~\windows
directory.

steve

-- 
-- 
play:steveh@grafex.Cupertino.CA.US 408.252.0578     work:harding@nas.nasa.gov
              A prince trapped in the body of a dirty old man.
Xref: sparky comp.bbs.waffle:5491 comp.mail.uucp:2400
From: dawson@willard.UUCP (Willard Dawson)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle,comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Mixed format addresses
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 08:16:30 EST
Organization: Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814

les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) writes:

> But maybe it's time for all the uucp sites to set up their own
> second-level domain names just like everyone is always advising.
> Then we'd find out how well the system really works.

Will we?  How?  Pardon me for inserting myself back into the discussion...

Just how do we go about monitoring the overall status of mail?  I'd say
that there is no way to measure the general health of the net in this
regard.  For example, it might be useful to know the number of messages
bounced in the last day (say, because of "no such site" from DNS queries).

There will always be those who say "it's working just great" because they
have no indication that mail is actually failing, even though it may be
doing so in large amounts.

Obviously, one cannot reasonably test mail to a large percentage of sites
on a regular basis in any sort of exhaustive fashion (or can one?).  Is
there anything in any flavor of SNMP that addresses email delivery stat-
istics?  That is not likely, as the problem lies several layers above
that usually addressed in those net statistic measurement protocols.

> 
> Les Mikesell
>   les@chinet.chi.il.us


-- 
dawson@willard.UUCP (Willard Dawson)
gatech!vdbsan!willard!dawson
emory!uumind!willard!dawson
Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814
From: garyng@gnct.com (Gary Ng)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Offline Readers
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 92 23:19:27 HKT
Organization: Global Network Communication Technology Co.

ranfry@mala.proteus.qc.ca (Ranfry) writes:

> Argghh NOT again.  Read, and read carefully.  I run a BBS using Waffle 
> v1.65, I love it, it works fine.  What I WANT is an offline system, such
> as Waffline, that allows my USERS to call up my BBS, compile and download
> all new messages and upload their replies.  Most of my users do NOT want to
> load up Waffle on their computers, some of them CANT.  So please, no more,.
> "Why don't you use Waffle?'  I do, they don't.
> 

I don't know if it is legal or not. Just copy the uu*.exe stuff and some of
the system files. You can then have a shrinked 'waffle' which can do nothing
but exchange mail and news. Ah yes, also rmail and rnews.

-gary

%A@gnct.com (%W)
Looking forward to 1997, this is less offending, isn't it Samson ?
From: abolins@visavis.cam.org (August Abolins)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Redit with Waffle
Date: 22 Dec 92 01:52:09 GMT
Organization: Vis-a-Vis Communications [Ontario+Quebec]

This goes out to:

   eoin@xocolatl.com, spooge%sizone@Civil.concordia.ca, and
   spooge%sizone@Civil.concordia.ca

...for my Internet mail to you bounced.

Hello,

How's the REDIT program working for ya?  I have installed it for my
Waffle setup and it seems to work fine from remote... except for a
couple of things.  At one point the program "froze" on the remote
caller.  I think that this may have something to do with Waffle still
being in memory... so you know how I can make Waffle drop out of DOS?
before I run REDIT?   Furthermore... since the program *is* 1988, it may
be a good idea to track down the later version if you can.  (If you do,
please let me know...)

I also failed to point out that another program called DOORWAY is needed
to handle the screen I/O properly.  Is *is* mentioned in the REDIT
documentation though.   DOORWAY and REDIT work great together.  Can you
get a copy of DOORWAY?  It is a very well-known program and you should
have no trouble finding it.

I sent REDIT encoded to you, but *that* did not get returned by PostMaster.
So... did you get the code?


---  /|ugust /|bolins  ---------------------[ abolins@visavis.cam.org ]---
From: Jochen Erwied <mack@joker.wes.open.de>
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: UUCICO SPEED
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 92 22:04:37 CET
Distribution: world
Organization: Creative Chaos Computing - Mailbox: +49-281-52975 (22.00-08.00)

dawson@willard.UUCP writes:

> > In <Tq10uB9w165w@joker.wes.open.de> Jochen Erwied <mack@joker.wes.open.de> 
> >
> > >I am using a patched UUCICO not reporting 'g' as supported protocol,
> > >but 'G'. My host supports 'g'-protocol with a 7 window/64 byte packets
> 
> He's obviously patched his UUCICO.EXE binary to report G rather than g.
> You can't simply change your SYSTEMS file and expect it to work without
> having support for the G protocol in the uucico executable.  I had to do
> something very similar to make the 1.64 RMAIL.EXE properly handle mail to
> x.400 mail addresses.
> 
> Perhaps Mike would be kind enough to share his method in patching the
> UUCICO binary?  That'd be very helpful; I'd love to give this a try with
> a couple of my feeds.  It shouldn't be all that difficult to arrive at
> the correct bytes to change in the UUCICO.EXE file to make it work.. but
> if Mike would share that info, we would not all have to arrive at the
> same conclusion separately...

Well - it was me who posted the article about patching uucico, so here's
the way to do it:

1. Copy uucico.exe to uucicog.exe
2. Use a diskeditor supporting search-commands (Norton's DiskEdit works
   fine) to modify this file.
3. Search for the string 'U%c'.
4. Replace it with 'UG' and a nullbyte.
5. Save your changes.
6. Quit the editor
7. If using BNU (or any other FOSSIL), remember to set the buffers
   high enough to hold 7*512 bytes, otherwise results may not be as
   expected...
8. Try connecting to a site supporting 'G'-protocol with command-line
   option '-k 512' using the patched uucico.

Good luck!

-Jochen

--
   Jochen Erwied - Asternweg 5 - D-W-4230 Wesel - Internet: mack@wes.open.de
    "Spass und Freude durch Musik, wir wollen's laut, das reisst uns mit.
 Denn Rockmusik ist nicht so leise, wie die ganze Schlagerschei**e" [Bonfire]

-- 
dawson@willard.UUCP (Willard Dawson)
gatech!vdbsan!willard!dawson
emory!uumind!willard!dawson
Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814

-- 
dawson@willard.UUCP (Willard Dawson)
gatech!vdbsan!willard!dawson
emory!uumind!willard!dawson
Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814
Xref: sparky comp.bbs.waffle:5483 comp.bbs.misc:1623 alt.bbs:7674 news.software.readers:2539
From: emmanuel.bataille@lill.frmug.fr.mugnet.org (Emmanuel Bataille) 
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.misc,alt.bbs,news.software.readers
Subject: Re: .QWK mail reader for Waffle
Date: 18 Dec 92 00:04:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Li'LL BBS - Paris, France
Reply-To: emmanuel.bataille@lill.frmug.fr.mugnet.org (Emmanuel Bataille) 

    Ne m'en demandez pas plus, c'est tout ce que j'ai :-)

-------
From: abolins%visavis.uucp@nyongwa.cam.org (August Abolins)
Keywords: waffle, qwk, mail, offline
Date: 12 Dec 92 13:57:56 GMT
Organization: Vis-a-Vis Communications [Ontario+Quebec]

....
An new product (for DOS) soon to be released is Robomail.  It combines
the features of an offline reader with a full communications package.
The comm s/w is already available as a separate product, Robocomm.
User's can develop scripts for virtually any host interface, and the
software has a beautiful "management system" that allows you to control
and re-configure things with ease.  Robocomm has one of the best
thought-out human interfaces I've ever seen.  I have confidence that
Robomail will be atleast equal in quality.

---  /|ugust /|bolins  --------------[ abolins%visavis@nyongwa.cam.org ]---


 * SLMR 2.1a #929 * Bambi III, la Revanche
From: coneill@polarbear.rahul.net (Chris O'Neill)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Waffle<-->Maxfax Setup
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 15:40:14 CST
Organization: Polar Bear Heaven BBS - Rankin Inlet, NWT

Is anyone using Waffle in conjunction with a Macronics MaxFax 9624 fax modem?
If so, and if you've managed to get the modem to report "CONNECT 9600" and
Waffle to shell out to MaxFax, receive the incoming fax, and then drop back to
Waffle, I'd REALLY like to hear how you did it!

I can't even get the modem to report "CONNECT 9600" and the !@#%*! docs that
come with the modem/software aren't worth using as emergency tp.

Since this is a rather specific modem config question, email answers would be
appreciated.  Anyone who's curious about the answer (if any) can also email me
and I'll make sure I forward the answer (if I find it) to you.

Thanks, in advance, for any help provided.  Happy New Year...

Chris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris O'Neill, System Operator           | "I typed it right...  It's the
Polar Bear Heaven BBS, Rankin Inlet, NWT | !@#$@^ computer that turned it
coneill@polarbear.rahul.net              | backwards!"       - Anonymous
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.misc,alt.bbs,news.software.readers
From: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise)
Subject: Re: Offline readers
Originator: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu
Organization: University of Vermont -- Division of EMBA Computer Facility
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 14:00:39 GMT

From article <R9ZkwB2w165w@willard.UUCP>, by dawson@willard.UUCP (Willard Dawson):
> cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise) writes:
>         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> A bogus address if ever I saw one!

	A little off-topic, but I'll explain - our SysAdmin knows about
it but apparently doesn't want anything to do with it.  It should,
of course be cblaise@moose.uvm.edu WITHOUT the UUCP.

	If anyone is interested in "convincing" him to fix it,
send me e-mail ;)

 TTYL
 Chris
From: russell@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Russell Schulz)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Helldiver is awesome!
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 10:14:20 MST
Organization: Private System, Edmonton, AB, Canada
X-Newsreader: rusnews v0.98

carlos@infoserv.com writes:

> Geez.. as not to ignite any more "my OS is better than your OS" flames,
> MS-DOS users could try rus-news v0.97 available at halcyon.com.

and if anyone even thinks of entering me in a `my newsreader is better than
Rhys' newsreader' contest then I'm going to go into hiding.
-- 
Russell Schulz  russell@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca  ersys!rschulz  Shad 86c
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle,comp.mail.uucp
From: fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner)
Subject: Re: Mixed format addresses
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 06:24:01 GMT

In article <RZm3VB4w165w@ssc60.sbwk.nj.us> tonyd@ssc60.sbwk.nj.us (Tony DeBari) writes:
|les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) writes:
|> Ummm, if you have a uunet account they will help you register your
|> own domain name under .com or .org at no charge.  If you call them
|> to pick up mail, it doesn't matter where you are anyway.
|
|I know that.  I didn't do it because I didn't think my site qualified for
|either .com (not a company) or .org (not an organization or domain park).

Red Beard Consulting is an extremely vague approximation of a
"company"; it's what I call myself when I'm not working for anyone
else.  However, I didn't have any problem registering redbeard.com ...

  Bill
From: mikey@slic.cts.com (Mike Shirley)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Anonymous UUCP Waffle Connections
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 06:40:55 PST
Organization: Muth Valley Bell  (619/390-SLIC BBS; V32bis)

fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner) writes:

> This is wrong.  It needs to run uucico with the flags -panonymous -uanonymous
> Create another errorlevel for anonymous UUCP.

Thought that might be the way to go.  I'll give that a shot.
I've created a new errorlevel once for auto-reboot before.
Appreciate the tip.

--
     Mike, WB6WUI   //   INET:  mikey@slic.cts.com   //   GEnie: SLIC
From: coneill@polarbear.rahul.net (Chris O'Neill)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: rmail not accepting % hacks
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 93 18:47:12 CST
Organization: Polar Bear Heaven BBS - Rankin Inlet, NWT

ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims) writes:
> fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner) writes:
>
> >|As an example, mail addressed to foo%bar.uucp@buzz is being sent to
> >|foo.uucp@buzz
>
> >Yes, don't let 4DOS get a hold of it.  Read the section in DOS.DOC entitled
>
> With 4DOS or NDOS, adding a second "%" may be productive, i.e. mail to
> foo%%bar.uucp@buzz.  Not all systems (mine, for one) need this, but it's
> worth checking.

Nice try, Ralph, but no go! |-(  If I use "%" I get the same results as Bill.
If I use "%%"  I get BOTH in the address (i.e. foo%%bar@somewhere.com)!

Someone else (didn't catch the name) posted that DOS.DOC covers this problem
(apparently related to using 4DOS or NDOS).  So, I guess I'll have to (Sigh!)
RT*D this time!!! ;-)

TTFN...

Chris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris O'Neill, System Operator           | "I typed it right...  It's the
Polar Bear Heaven BBS, Rankin Inlet, NWT | !@#$@^ computer that turned it
coneill@polarbear.rahul.net              | backwards!"       - Anonymous
From: otto@jybox.jyu.fi (Otto J. Makela)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Waffle and Share.exe question?
Date: 25 Dec 92 01:49:01 GMT
Organization: Jyvaskyla Electronic Mailbox

root@cibbs.UUCP writes:

[Re the undocumented /F flag of COMMAND.COM]

> Please note that the above ONLY works for primary shells. That is, if you
> run COMMAND.COM to shell to DOS say from Waffle...this doesn't work.

Um, when I just shelled out to DOS from this here Waffle, and typed
	COMMAND /F
the shell that was spawned did have this feature enabled.  Thus, if you
edit your /waffle/extern/_system to have the lines
--
shell   /command="C:\COMMAND /F"
command /command="C:\COMMAND /F /C %i"
--
it works as expected.  I've done this.

Or did you perhaps mean that it is not inherited from the calling COMMAND?
True, but irrelevant.

   /* * * Otto J. Makela <otto@jybox.jyu.fi> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */
  /* Phone: +358 41 613 847, BBS: +358 41 211 562 (V.32bis/USR-HST,24h/d) */
 /* Mail: Kauppakatu 1B18/SF-40100 Jyvaskyla/Finland, ICBM: 62.14N25.44E */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */
From: ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims)
Subject: Re: Archive-Server Requests to Halcyon.COM
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 07:44:37 GMT

jerryg@jaiser.rain.com (Jerry Gaiser) writes:

>ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims) writes:

>> jerryg@jaiser.rain.com (Jerry Gaiser) writes:

>> >And as I discovered last night, don't append a signature because the
>> >server craps out with too many errors.

>> Placing the word 'quit' (no quotes, of course) as the last command
>> in the requests stops processing at that point, so the sig file gets

That should have been 'end', not 'quit'.  Jeez.  Shoulda thunk.

-- 
     halcyon.com, Public Access Internet, Seattle, WA, +1 206 382 6245
                 "A World of Information at your Fingertips"
                 P.O. Box 555, Grapeview, WA 98546-0555, USA
                    ralphs@halcyon.com,  +1 206 955 1050
Xref: sparky comp.bbs.waffle:5627 comp.mail.uucp:2452
From: rick@ricksys.lonestar.org (Richard McCombs KB5SNF)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle,comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Mixed format addresses
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 02:36:13 CST
Organization: The Red Headed League; Lawton, Ok
X-Newsreader: rusnews v0.96

bobk@dogear.spk.wa.us (Bob Kirkpatrick) writes:

> rick@ricksys.lonestar.org (Richard D. McCombs KB5SNF) writes:
> 
>> les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) writes:
>> 
>> > In article <BzMIIu.Lnp@cs.psu.edu> fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenne
>> >>|The problem with smarthost: hishost!bighost is that mail for myneighbor
>> >>|(ie: myhost!hishost!myneighbor!user) goes up to bighost.
>> > 
>> >>Only if you don't have your PATHS file set up properly.
>> > 
>> > But it will still force mail to direct neighbors of hishost to go to
>> > bighost and back unless you also maintain path entries for those machines.
>> > If the mailer on hishost is smart enough to resolve what it can and
>> > pass the rest on to bighost then you are better off using hishost as
>> > your smarthost instead of hishost!bighost.
>> 
>> But if his host isn't running software smart enough to do anything but
>> rmail user1
>>  or
>> rmail neighbor1!thathost!anotherhost!someuser
[my mouthfull deleted]
> 
> Good lord. That was certainly a mouthfull. (-:
> 
> In terms of Waffle, all you have to do is properly list your smarthost,
> and then send your mail to user@some.site or somesite!user. The heavy
> convolution is totally unnecessary.
> 

I was trying to explain why you might want neighbor!smarterhost as a
smarthost, and also that unless you have only on connection you might
want something in your paths file so that all of you mail doesn't go
through your paths file, especially if your smarthost is longdistance,
but some host are reachable via a cheaper path.
From: mikey@slic.cts.com (Mike Shirley)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: User-Only type documentation
Summary: USER.DOC > NEWUSER.DOC & the \EXTERN feature
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 06:25:44 PST
Organization: Muth Valley Bell  (619/390-SLIC BBS; V32bis)

dwrage@ddt-archives.athens.oh.us (David William Wrage) writes:

> I'm thinking of editing the USER.DOC file, it's just htat I'm too d*mn lazy t
> really want to do it.  any ideas?

I took the USER.DOC file and editted it down from 50K to 35K and
named it NEWUSER.DOC.  I tried to pare it down to just the
basics, leaving only what I felt a newuser would need.

I then added an \extern file that allows immediate ZMODEM download
without having to navagate the FILES subsystem.  Folks with
terminal software having auto ZMODEM detection get the file
easily.

Splash and the sign-up screens notify the newuser of the
existance of this \extern command.

--
     Mike, WB6WUI   //   INET:  mikey@slic.cts.com   //   GEnie: SLIC
From: bob@1776.COM (Robert Coe)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: The woes of ^Z
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 92 07:08:34 EST
Distribution: world
Organization: 1776 Enterprises, Sudbury MA

mark@ve6mgs.ampr.org (Mark G. Salyzyn) writes:
> system@freds.cojones.com (George W. Hayduke) writes:
> >Yes, well, that's not Waffle's bug, that's part of the CP/M ancestry of 
> >MS-DOS. Lucky us, lucky us.
> BS, they can talk to files `raw' under DOS if they want, this is the
> `default' behaviour of UNIX and many other operating systems. Someone
> just neglected to understand the default behavior of the compiler support
> library when they wrote Waffle. Don't feel comfortable, this IS A BUG in
> Waffle and has nothing to do with MS-DOS except that `text' mode is
> default behavior in their compiler that should have been otherwise!
> 
> Toy software uses `text' mode for talking to files ...

I have neither the right nor the inclination to speak for Tom, who can ob-
viously speak for himself, but my $0.02 is that "text" mode may indeed have
been the right choice for Waffle.  I suspect that Waffle would be bigger, 
and possibly slower, if it used "raw" mode (and therefore had to do its own 
EOL checking).  Size is an important consideration, since I believe that Tom 
has made sure that even the latest version will run on a 640K machine.  Most
users never encounter the ^Z problem, and fixing it may hurt more users than
it helps.

In any case, the use of text mode was a design decision.  You may not think 
it was the right decision (and your argument may be valid), but that doesn't 
make it a bug.

   ___            _                                           -  Bob
   /__) _   /    / ) _   _
(_/__) (_)_(_)  (___(_)_(/_______________________________________ bob@1776.COM
Robert K. Coe ** 14 Churchill St, Sudbury, Massachusetts 01776 ** 508-443-3265
From: dwrage@ddt-archives.athens.oh.us (David William Wrage)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: User-Only type documentation
Date: 29 Dec 92 03:23:32 GMT
Organization: * DDT Archives BBS *

Could someone please tell me where I could find a file designed specifically
for users of waffle?  I don't want a file like the current USER.DOC of 1.65
that details EVERY COMMAND including the restricted ones.  What I'm looking for
is a documentation file I could make available to the users for download so
that they could navigate my Waffle Door a little bit better.

I'm thinking of editing the USER.DOC file, it's just htat I'm too d*mn lazy to
really want to do it.  any ideas?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 David William Wrage              Usenet....dwrage@ddt-archives.athens.oh.us
 SysOp of DDT Archives BBS
 614/594-6588 at 2400 Baud        WWIVlink....1@16471     WWIVnet.....1@6471