HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jochen@busybit.mrz.sub.org (Jochen Fahrner)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: disk mirroring
Date: 29 Aug 92 13:15:39 GMT
Organization: Busybit's Software Labor, D-8068 Pfaffenhofen
X-Md4-Signature: f684f7a9ab83cb784f1e1fe4f0fb2ac9

In article <1992Aug26.222016.19046@csi.uottawa.ca> dominic@scooter.genie.uottawa.ca (Dominic Richens) writes:

   I'm using Chantal Systems Corp's Paragon virtual SCSI disk managers, with
   their Cornerstone SCSI drivers under SCO ODT (available for Xenix too).  
   It does disk striping, spanning, and mirroring (RAID) plus a bunch of 
   other stuff I don't understand.  I'm using it for disk striping: 
   two 1740's + two Segate Elite's = 3Mbytes/second!

   Contact info:

   Chantal Systems Corporation
   6265 Greenwich Drive
   Suite 201
   San Diega, Calif 92122
   (619) 452 0975

In some computer magazine I read, that Chantal has gone bankrupt.
We use their Cornerstone software on our SCO Unix 3.2.2 box.
We could not get an update of the cornerstone software, to install on
SCO 3.2v4. Which version of cornerstone do you have ? Does it run on
SCO 3.2v4 ?
-- 
Jochen Fahrner, D-8068 Pfaffenhofen, jochen@busybit.mrz.sub.org
Xref: sparky comp.unix.sysv386:13759 comp.windows.x:15858
From: shite@sinkhole.unf.edu (Stephen Hite)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Problems with X386 1.2E dumping core on SVR4
Date: 29 Aug 92 13:22:31 GMT
Organization: University of North Florida, Jacksonville

In article <BtopuG.5Ds@compound.se> smith@compound.se (Bjorn Smith) writes:
>We have compiled the X11R5 PL16 plus patches to get X386 1.2E.
>The system was built on a SVR4 (Consensys) with sdbm library.
>
>Everything compiled and installed straight. The system starts
>(using mwm an a couple of xterms etc) but after a while the
>server dumps core. It appears to happen when one moves the mouse
>but I'm not sure that is the reason.
>
>Trying to build the server with -g option gives the following when
>linking error message:
>
>ld: X386: libelf error:  Memory error: output file space elf_update:
>
>Looking at the core file (without symbol info) with sdb gives:
>
>Warning: no -g information in /usr/X386/bin/X386
>0x800149ac (_kill+12:) jb +0x00006e12 <8001b7c4> [ _cerror ]
>*t
>abort()
>abort()
>ddxGiveUp()
>AbortDDX()
>x386SigHandler()
>?()
>?()
>*
>

   As a test case for something that is known to work fine, ftp David
Dawes' SVR4 compiled binaries of X386 1.2E from suphys.physics.su.oz.au
in the Esix_4/x11r5/Binaries hierarchy.


Steve Hite
shite@sinkhole.unf.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser)
Subject: Re: Unix/Xwindows on a 486...Where/How much?
Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix  (508) 655-3848
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 01:02:50 GMT

larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>>This is for limited users, eh?  The last I looked, DELL V.4 was $1295.
>I believe you are correct.  The Dell SVR4 4.0 ufs filesystem (with
>SCSI drives) benches about 100% faster than their 3.0 (2.1) release..

Somehow I don't see what this sales pitch has to do with the original
comment.

-- 
bill@unixland.natick.ma.us                      ESIX Mailing List Moderator
Public Access UNIX/USENET/E-MAIL!  UUCP Accounts Available!  (508) 655-3848
5 lines  -  Located in Natick, MA   USA    Supporting V.32/PEP/V.42bis, etc.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: davidg@nevada.edu (DAVID GONZALES)
Subject: Tape Drive Subsystems under Esix 4.0.4
Organization: University of Nevada System Computing Services
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 13:16:31 GMT


Hello,
	I am in the market for a Tape drive system for my ESIX 4.0.4 computer. I 
currently am running a ISA AMI 486-33 with 16 MB's RAM and two ESDI drives
totaling 1.1 Gigabytes. I would like a tape system that is compatible with my
Sun Sparc 470 tape at work. I was looking at the Archive VP 150/250 SCSI with
a Adaptec AHA-1542K controller. What other tapes will do the job? Thanks.

david a. gonzales
UNLV/HRC
From: liuwu@acuson.com (Wu Liu)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Standard SCO UNIX Compressed tar ?
Date: 4 Sep 92 16:38:05 GMT
Organization: Acuson; Mountain View, California

dold@unislc.uucp (Clarence Dold) writes:
>Is compression available on SCO UNIX tar?
>The Norton Utilities for UNIX mumbles something during install about the
>distribution diskettes being compressed, and requiring a certain revision
>of SCO in order to work.
>Sure enough, a "tar xv" from the command line yields 1880K from a 1.2MB
>diskette.  doing a "tar cvf /tmp/junk ." yields a 1660K archive.

Sort of.  Decompression upon extraction is automatic, if you've
specified the correct key to tar during archival to media.  Unless
it's changed recently, you have to both compress the file(s)
yourself and remove the ".Z" extension from the filename(s) before
running tar to save to media.

It's not the cleanest of approaches, but it works.  Cuts down on
the amount of distribution media dramatically.  One of the first
engineering test versions of Open Desktop 1.0 would have taken up
over an estimated 70 5.25" 1.2mb floppies without it.
-- 
Wu Liu                          Software Engineer, User Interface Group
liuwu@acuson.COM                Acuson
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: larry@acts.uucp (Larry Palmer)
Subject: Re: Help "gdb" under ISC V3.0
Organization: Active Software Inc.
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 12:12:28 GMT

pat@abtlabs.uucp (Patrick Conroy) writes:
>Has anyone successfully built/installed "gdb 4.6" under ISC V3.0?

I'm still running ISC V2.02, but I installed gdb 4.6 recently without
too many problems.  I used "./configure i386-sysv32".  "sco" might
have worked too, but I was a little uneasy about doing that.  Here are
the problems I did have:

- The stuff in the "bfd" directory uses 'index' as a variable and as a
  structure element, but sysdep.h in that directory had a "#define
  index(s,c) strchr(s,c)", for BSD->SYSV compatability which confused
  it.  I just took out the #define.  

- Also in bfd: sysdep.h tries to include "utimes.h" which doesn't
  exist on my system.  Oddly enough, I couldn't find a .h file
  anywhere in the /usr/include hierarchy which defined "struct
  utimbuf" (it's defined in the man page), although libc.a does 
  contain "utime".  I just took out the #include <utimes.h>; nothing
  in bfd calls utime anyway.

- Also in bfd: practically every file generated tons of "warning:
  illegal pointer combination" for function references to
  bfd_false.  Didn't hurt anything. 

- In readline:  ptem.h is needed, and gets included from sysdep.h only
  if USG, TIOCGWINSZ, and either USGr3 or USGr4 are defined.  Trouble
  is that TIOCGWINSZ gets defined too late, and USGr3 and USGr4 are
  never defined.  I just included ptem.h explicitely.  Linking sysdep.h
  in this directory to sysdep-sco.h instead of sysdep-norm would
  probably work as well.

Other than that, the only problem I had was that the gdb image is 4.3
Meg, which was slightly larger than my ulimit, which I had to increase
(in /etc/default/login).  Also "make install" whined a lot about not
being able to put things in directories I didn't have, and I ended up
just manually copying the gdb image to /usr/local/bin.

Bottom line is it took about 3 hours, but it's working fine now.

-- 
Larry Palmer 508-266-1334 (v/f)           |   Active Software, Inc.
uunet!acts!larry, or                      |   20 Ethan Allen Drive
larry%acts@uunet.uu.net                   |   Acton, MA 01720
Xref: sparky comp.unix.sysv386:13888 comp.unix.wizards:3759
From: jurban@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: CD-ROM Drivers anywhere?/(PC) SysV.
Date: 1 Sep 92 12:05:49 EST
Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services

 It was suggested by a friend that I ask, if anyone out here has or
knows of anyone, who's written cd-rom drivers for (PC) SysV.

 I'm myself new to Unix.

 Just below's an excerpt from a response I received this morning: 

----------

CD-ROM seems to be somewhat neglected in the SysV world, while Sun
has had it for several years (could be less, I'm not sure).  I'm a
bit surprised by this (heck, people are writing serial drivers and
SLIP/PPP, why not CD-ROM?) but I suppose it stems from there not
being much of interest for SysV people on CD ... the stuff appears to
be of a non-computational nature and this addresses itself to the
``creative'' SunOS/Mac users, not SysV/MSWindows/DOS ``business''
users.  However, this is a poor excuse and I'd be surprised if we
don't have CD-ROM drivers in less than a year.

Try asking on comp.unix.sysv386 or comp.unix.wizards (make sure you
specify that you're talking (PC) SysV in the latter group, UNIX is
a lot more than SysV and SunOS/BSD) and let me know what they say.
I'd like to find out too.

>    At this time there is no support for CD Rom file systems. You could
>    read and write to the raw device


[...an excerpt from Dell's Support - I'm using Dell's latest.]


``read'' is correct, but ``write'' must be a slip of the mind ...
no-one has accomplished writing to a non-erasable CD-ROM :-)

Reading/dumping the raw device should be possible but you'd have one
helluva time doing a linear search along a 600MB file.  Actually, it
shouldn't be too difficult (for a C hacker) to write a program that
simply read the CD-ROM once, extracted the file-system information
and built an index in a disk-file (those indices simply being
seek-offsets from the start).  It would require knowing how a CD-ROM
file system was put together, though, but it's a very simple,
rudimentary system, much like DOSs.  Again, I'm surprised no-one has
done it ... it would enable you to extract the files from the disc
much as you do with tar from a floppy, only a lot faster.  I'm
getting some low-level system books on V.4 in a week or so, if you
don't get anything out of the newsgroups I'll see if the books
contain any hints or suggestions.

----------

 I'd very much appreciate any comments, suggestions - either here
or as e-mail directly to me.

   Thanks,

     Joseph          jurban@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: bill@Celestial.COM (Bill Campbell)
Subject: Re: SCO support (was: How to replace disk driver in SCO Unix ?)
Organization: Celestial Software, Mercer Island, WA
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1992 03:21:48 GMT

In <1992Aug26.200258.1899@saans.north.de> rolf@saans.north.de (Rolf Nerstheimer) writes:

:jochen@mrz.sub.org (Jochen Fahrner) writes:
:[...]
:>Support people also have to know about unix and C.
:>It is not enough to know, how to use a pencil and a paper.
:>If support people don't understand my problem, I could tell it directly
:>to SCO developers and do not need these guys.

:You could, if they would listen to you !

:SCO told me, that there is no way for them to accept bug-reports via e-mail
:or to do any kind of support via e-mail..

That's funny.  The only time I've ever called SCO support was in
the middle of an installation when I was at a client site and ran
into unexpected/undocumented problems.  They have special support
for short installation problems (10 minute or less).  All my other
requests for support and bug reports go to support@sco.com.

:They said: tell it to your distributor or _buy_ support from SCO.
:I believe, they don't listen to their customers anymore.
:SAD THING, IMHO.

I find exactly the opposite here in the U.S.  SCO has at least
two people assigned to monitor traffic on the net, at least the
biz.sco newsgroups, and there are quite a few SCO employees who
monitor it on their own.  These people frequently post answers to
questions, IT Scripts, and get into net.discussions on various
SCO related topics.  The biz.sco newsgroups are also distributed
via a mailing list to those who don't have news access.  SCO has
a far greater presence on the net than say, Interactive (SunSoft),
DELL, USL....

Bill
-- 
INTERNET:  bill@Celestial.COM   Bill Campbell; Celestial Software
UUCP:   ...!thebes!camco!bill   6641 East Mercer Way
             uunet!camco!bill   Mercer Island, WA 98040; (206) 947-5591
SPEED COSTS MONEY -- HOW FAST DO YOU WANT TO GO?
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: pim@cti-software.nl (Pim Zandbergen)
Subject: Re: X386 1.2E (X11R5) binaries for AT&T SVR3.2.3?
Organization: CTI Software BV, The Hague, The Netherlands
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 23:47:54 GMT

ilan343@violet.berkeley.edu (Geraldo Veiga) writes:

>I understand that the reason the binaries for SVR3.2 systems are not
>available is the lack of support for R3.2 shared libs (the binaries
>will be huge).  Are there any plans of changing this in
>future releases of X386 1.2E?  How hard is it to create shared libs
>under SVR3.2?  We, poor 3.2 holdouts, are the ones that need X386 1.2E
>the most.  Maybe is about time to take the jump and switch to SVR4, but
>I am still waiting to see what R4.2 products are going to look like.

I'm afraid all the wizards that could make shared X libs for R3.2
have switched to R4 and aren't interested anymore (who could blame them).

Meanwhile, I'll stick with X386 1.1b, maybe recompile it with
gcc-2.2.2 -O2 -m486.
-- 
Pim Zandbergen                      domain : pim@cti-software.nl
CTI Software BV                     uucp   : uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!ctisbv!pim
Laan Copes van Cattenburch 70       phone  : +31 70 3542302
2585 GD The Hague, The Netherlands  fax    : +31 70 3512837
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.windows.x
From: holder@telesoft.com (Robert L. Holder @ignite)
Subject: Re: Problems with X386 1.2E dumping core on SVR4
Organization: TeleSoft, San Diego, CA, USA
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 21:53:04 GMT

In <1992Aug29.132231.20880@sinkhole.unf.edu> shite@sinkhole.unf.edu (Stephen Hite) writes:


>>We have compiled the X11R5 PL16 plus patches to get X386 1.2E.
>>The system was built on a SVR4 (Consensys) with sdbm library.
>>
>>Everything compiled and installed straight. The system starts
>>(using mwm an a couple of xterms etc) but after a while the
>>server dumps core. It appears to happen when one moves the mouse
>>but I'm not sure that is the reason.
>>
>>Trying to build the server with -g option gives the following when
>>linking error message:
>>
>>ld: X386: libelf error:  Memory error: output file space elf_update:

This may be caused by insufficient kernel limits for 

HDATLIM
SDATLIM
HVMMLIM
SVMMLIM
HSTKLIM
SSTKLIM

When I link LARGE programs with -g I had to boost these from the
defaults of 0x1000000 to 0x3000000. This was under NCR Unix SVR4/386.
Try to boost these and relink your kernel. Then relink you application
with -g. 
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: mike@maria.wustl.edu
Subject:  How to integrate job control into SVR4/Dell?
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 8:24:32 CDT
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA02034; Sat, 29 Aug 92 06:30:04 -0700
X-Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA07521; Sat, 29 Aug 92 06:29:12 -0700
X-To: comp.unix.sysv386.usenet


I'm building rn 4.4.4.  It builds and runs alright, but I can't seem
to include the right stuff to enable BSD job control.  Tips?
From: davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: SCO support (was: How to replace disk driver in SCO Unix ?)
Date: 26 Aug 92 20:34:45 GMT
Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY

In article <JOCHEN.92Aug24111621@mrz.sub.org>, jochen@mrz.sub.org (Jochen Fahrner) writes:

| I don't have another way to tell SCO about bugs, than through our
| distributor. 

Mail to support@sco.com. They may or may not fix your bug, but they sure
as hell read mail to that address (and this newsgroup).
-- 
bill davidsen, GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
    I admit that when I was in school I wrote COBOL. But I didn't compile.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: slangley@constant.demon.co.uk (Simon Langley)
Subject: Re: DOS Merge and bundling (was Re: SAS 2.0)
Organization: Home
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 16:51:22 GMT

Evan Leibovitch (evan@telly.on.ca) wrote:
: 
: Sheesh, folks, do we have to go through the bundling versus unbundling
: thing again? Isn't it enough that buyers have a choice? Isn't that a
: better approach than forcing everyone to buy something that many people
: clearly do not need?
: 
Generally I am not in favour of unbundling having seen the problems that 
some people have had not having eg a development system.  However, I bought
UNIX to get away from DOS and I would at least like that much choice.

-- 
   Simon Langley                   (preferred)   slangley@constant.demon.co.uk
   Hampstead, London                             slangley@cix.compulink.co.uk
From: tempel@sun490.fdu.edu (Philippe N. Tempel)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Can't boot ISC 2.0.2
Keywords: ISC 2.0.2 boot
Date: 26 Aug 92 01:57:04 GMT
Organization: Fairleigh Dickinson University

I recently bought an AMD 386-40Mhz clone motherboard and installed it in my
AT compatible case.  I tried to boot ISC 2.0.2 from drive A, but I had no
luck in getting it going.  The hardware I have is:

AMD 306-40Mhz clone motherboard
  UMC chipset
  AMI BIOS
  8MB memory
Genoa SuperEGA HIRes+ video card
Amdek 722 monitor
Seagate ST-251 hard disk
3:1 MFM controller
I/O card
220 watt power supply
Maxi-Switch keyboard

After I cold boot with the ISC boot disk in drive A, I get the message
"Booting the UNIX system..." and see some disk activity.  Finally, after
4 minutes the screen goes blank and the system hangs in limbo.  Any ideas
before I take the motherboard back?  I did disable caching, shadow ROM and
shadow RAM.

Thanks,
Philippe
From: jrh@mustang.dell.com (Randy Howard)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Timed in sysvr4
Date: 25 Aug 92 20:07:37 GMT
Organization: Dell Computer Co

ken@casper.cs.uct.ac.za (Ken MacGregor) writes:

>As the header says we would like to know whether anyone knows
>of a timed deamon for v.4 ideally we would like it to use ntp instead
>of the normal timed synchronisation, as we also use trumpet on pc's
>as a newsreader.

We ship xntp with our V.4.  The sources are will be available for ftp
soon (haven't put the 2.2 sources up yet).  When it is available, it will
be on dell2.dell.com, in sources/v2.2.

-- 
Randy Howard            _o	    @'s: jrh@dell.com
Dell Computer Corp.     \<,	    !'s: ...!uunet!dellunix!jrh
______________________()/ ()______________________________________________
Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad.  -Aldous Huxley
From: davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: When to install FAS
Date: 2 Sep 92 14:31:13 GMT
Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY

In article <1992Aug31.192005.8610@cv.ruu.nl>, fred@cv.ruu.nl (Fred Appelman) writes:
| I just installed a new V32bis/V42bis modem under DELL unix. Everything
| seems to work with the standard tty drivers. Can someone tell me when 
| and under what conditions I should install the FAS drives.

  If you have 16550's and the Dell drivers are supporting them, then you
probably don't need FAS. You may get some gains from FAS (haven't tried
it on Dell), but it does not run at the streams level, so there is some
overhead involved. I can't remember how much. There's also SAS, the
streams version of FAS, which was developed from an earlier FAS and may
not have all the enhancements present in FAS.

  In short, you don't need FAS with Dell, but you may get some
performance improvement from it, and may want to use SAS instead. Not
very definitive, right?

-- 
bill davidsen, GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
    I admit that when I was in school I wrote COBOL. But I didn't compile.
Xref: sparky comp.unix.sysv386:13767 comp.sys.ibm.pc:459 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:22941
From: dwex@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (david.e.wexelblat)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Trident Microsystems Incorporated?
Date: 29 Aug 92 18:42:14 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

Can anyone tell me how to get in touch with "Trident Microsystems
Incorporated", makers of the TVGA8900C SVGA chipset?  I have the
TVGA8900 Techincal Reference, and it has no address or phone number.
I need to track down a more recent Technical Reference that discusses
the TVGA8900C, which has some register set differences.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
David Wexelblat             | dwex@mtgzfs3.att.com  | Somebody get me a
AT&T Bell Laboratories      | ...!att!mtgzfs3!dwex  |   cheeseburger!
200 Laurel Ave - 4B-421     |                       |      
Middletown, NJ  07748       | (908) 957-5871        | --Steve Miller Band
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: rick@digibd.com (Rick Richardson)
Subject: Re: DELL SVR4 - separate /usr and /var filesystem?
Organization: DigiBoard Incorporated, Eden Prairie, MN
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 09:05:28 GMT
Keywords: dell svr4 filesystem

rhealey@dellr4.digibd.com (Rob Healey) writes:

>	Hmmm, when I did a customizable install of 2.1 I was allowed to
>	create a seperate /var partition. Maybe you're to trusting of the
>	"automatic"/default install option? I've never trusted vendor's
>	to provide a decent "default" configuration so I always choose
>	"custom" options if available...

Wink, wink...

Hey Rob, I've never seen you trust a vendors "custom" option, either,
even Dell's!  I used to think that Dell had the most complete out
of the box UNIX - then I saw that you had replaced all of the
Dell extras with new versions of everything!  What the world
really needs is ... a tape image of Rob's machine. :-)

-- 
Rick Richardson		Email: rick@digibd.com	This space intentionally
Senior Staff Engineer	Fax:   (612) 943-0803	blank until 1996 elections.
DigiBoard, Inc.		Tel:   (612) 943-5383
Eden Prairie, MN	Radio: N0NMY
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: dold@unislc.uucp (Clarence Dold)
Subject: Re: how to write 525MB to Wangtek 525ES on Dell 2.1?
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 00:59:08 GMT

From article <17bskcINNfo9@smaug.West.Sun.COM>, by jackn@caspianc.ism.isc.com (Jack Neman):

[ I have chopped quite a bit.  I hope the "author attribution is still
correct for the following snippet: ]

>>	Writing blocks of 512 bytes to tape /dev/rq525st0
>>	Wrote 1000238 blocks of size 512, total 512121856 bytes
>>	=== root allegro:/adagio/usr/grog 516 # writetape.bsd /dev/rq525st0 

Are we picking nits, or talking about the difference between 250MB and 525MB?

Unless I misunderstood the start of this thread, it looks like the example
cited here is writing 488 MB (512121856 bytes) to the tape.

From what I recall of the early days of Archive streamers, that might be all 
that fits on a 525MB tape, with repeated blocks occasionally.

-- 
---
Clarence A Dold - dold@unislc.slc.Unisys.COM
               ...pyramid!ctnews!tsmiti!dold
From: tdunbar@vttcf.cc.vt.edu (Thomas Dunbar)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: TeX users?
Keywords: TeX
Date: 28 Aug 92 11:06:35 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA


 i use TeX regularly on AIX and on a PC at work and on my Linux box here at home.
used for: my technical papers, my children's science fair reports, christmas
cards, drawing (MetaFont), flyers, etc. TeX gives better looking output than 
anything else.
 thomas
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386