HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bw152@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Gary A Hensley)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Ami Pro
Date: 7 Oct 1992 20:56:01 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


 
Has lotus announced when Ami Pro for OS/2 will be available? 
I am going to be graduating in December and while I can I want to
get the Educational discount price. ($99.00).  Is there going to
be any special upgrade paths to go from the windows version to the
OS/2 version?
 
Gary Hensley
BW152@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu
VD208CS@Opie.Bgsu.Edu
From: msf@skaro.as.arizona.edu (Michael Fulbright)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Citoh Printer Driver
Date: 9 Oct 92 04:41:19 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

I have inherited a Citoh Model C310 dot matrix printer and i'm trying
to find a printer driver for OS/2 V2.0. I can print text ok, but
I need a driver to handle graphics.  I did not get manuals with the
printer, however. If someone knows of a driver or has the manufacturers
phone number I would appreciate it.

thanks
michael fulbright
msf@as.arizona.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: ricky@lindblat.cc.monash.edu.au (Mr RS Mcconachy)
Subject: Re: Quattro Pro for Windows causes GP fault in OS/2 2.0 Seamless Mode
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 23:40:55 GMT

jwichman@cssjgw (Jon Wichman) writes:
>In article <BvutCs.MH5@apollo.hp.com> ced@APOLLO.HP.COM (Carl Davidson)  
>writes:
>> Yesterday I posted an article describing how Quattro Pro for Windows
>> causes the following error in seamless mode (it runs fine in a  
>full-screen 
>> session):
>>  
>>               Application Error
>>  
>>          QPW has caused an error in
>>          WIN-OS/2*.
>>          GP Fault in Module: SWINVGA.DRV
>>          at 000A:007C
>>          Press OK to close application.
>> 
>I have the same symptoms with running in seamless mode and, it also dies  
>in full-screen session if you try to use the DB desktop (chose "Data" and  
>then "Database Desktop") from within QPW or by running the DB desktop by  
>itself.

I haven't tried running QPW seamlessly (I have an ATI Graphics Vantage
8514a card), but the "Database Desktop" dies on me too when I try to
run it from a WinOS2 session (pops up a dialog saying "private directory
in use" and then goes belly up).  Add this one to the list.......
Other than these hassles it's a neat program though.

Richard McConachy.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: mikel@networx.com (Mike Lempriere)
Subject: Re: te/2 problem
Organization: NetWorx
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 18:11:17 GMT

Try shift-F1 through shift-F4.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: TE/2's slow screen display in vt100 emulation
From: soh3@quads.uchicago.edu (min-woong sohn)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 02:27:11 GMT
Reply-To: soh3@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago

I just tried to used te/2 with new commpak.dll and found that its
vt100 screen display is very slow in 9600 baud connection.  It seems
that is is slightly faster than 2400 baud display.  Any help will
be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Min

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: paul@tct.com (Paul Levin)
Subject: Re: Why OS/2 **WILL** fail
Organization: TC Telemanagement, Clearwater, FL
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 13:43:39 GMT

According to austin@franklin.com:
>In article <1aa1m3INNkf9@matt.ksu.ksu.edu> bewhite@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (MacroMan) writes:
>
>   cummins@a.cs.okstate.edu (CUMMINS JOHN WILLI) writes:
>
>
>   >Anyone got a clue for me on a way to whap a directory and all its children
>   >into the bit-bucket w/o typing a compound command?  How about a simple
>   >compound command?  (Must delete SubDirs containing files and other SubDirs w/o
>   >naming them explicitly)
>

There is a shareware program called pdel (a DOS program) which works fine
in a VDM (I have only FAT file systems under OS/2).

There is also the GNU file utilities (see SIMTEL).  The rm -rf command
should do the job.  GNU file utils are available for DOS and native OS/2.
-- 
From:  Paul Levin   paul@count.tct.com   813-532-2239 (work, 9-5 EST)
    --> Jesus loves you, and died for you; thank Him today. <--
From: bbm@po.CWRU.Edu (Brian B. Mathewson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Can I use DOG do de-fragment "EA DATA. SF"?
Date: 9 Oct 1992 20:00:07 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bbm@po.CWRU.Edu (Brian B. Mathewson)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc12.ins.cwru.edu


My FAT drive, which I formatted before installing OS/2 2.0, is fairly
well fragmented.  I believe a lot of it is the file EA DATA. SF because
it grows every time I add more files to my system.

If I clear the hidden and system attributes on this file, can I use
the shareware Disk Organizer (DOG) program to defragment this file
and the rest of my disk? 

I have an 80 Meg Seagate IDE hard drive, in two partitions, 70Megs and
10 Megs.


-- 

Brian Mathewson   bbm@r2d2.eeap.cwru.edu
                  bbm at Cleveland Freenet
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: XMS/EMS IN A DOS VDM
Date: 9 Oct 92 18:05:05 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Oct9.151916.17106@njitgw.njit.edu> dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:
>used the \OS2\MDOS\HIMEM.SYS to get me XMS.  You may also need to use
>the DOS settings so that the HIMEM.SYS driver will know how much to
>provide.

Note also that you'll need to use the \OS2\MDOS\EMM386.SYS driver to
get EMS in specific DOS sessions.  Don't use the one that comes with
DOS 5.  It'll probably fail.  You don't need the EMM386 driver for
accessing UMB's - they're accessed via the OS/2 HIMEM.SYS driver.

Again, I think details like page frame location and memory sizes are
determined by the DOS settings.

-- 
David Charlap         |"there aren't 50,000 things for which it's worth writing
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu| software; and the computer industry doesn't have enough
----------------------+ programmers to create that much good software.
Therefore, most of it must be worthless" -- Boris Beizer "The Frozen Keyboard"
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: MS ready to release 32-bit Word & Excel?!?! Read on...
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:05:20 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <kevinc.718341739@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca> kevinc@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca (Kevin Crocker) writes:
>bill@snoopy (Bill Poitras) writes:
>
>>Kevin Crocker (kevinc@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca) wrote:
>>: goyal@utdallas.edu (Mohit K. Goyal) writes:
>>: Hey, no problem, just take all those 1Mb SIMMS and toss 'em in a Mac -
>>: they work just fine and it's a hell of a lot cheaper than getting
>>: Apple's SIMM upgrades.
>
>>Not really.  PCs use 1x9 SIMMs while Macs use 1x8 SIMMs.  I don't think
>>they are compatible.  Am I wrong?
>
>I don't see why they wouldn't be compatible. The 9 chippers have 8
>regular chips and a parity chip - the MAC's don't pay attention to
>parity chips and thus ignore it.  I know it works, I did it and my MAc
>II is working wonderously (for a MAC) :-).

Except that (I belive) the 8-chip Mac SIMMs have a different socket.

Note that the high end Macs (68030 and 68040 based) use 9-chip SIMMs.



-- 
David Charlap         |"there aren't 50,000 things for which it's worth writing
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu| software; and the computer industry doesn't have enough
----------------------+ programmers to create that much good software.
Therefore, most of it must be worthless" -- Boris Beizer "The Frozen Keyboard"
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: doug@shako.Colorado.EDU (Doug McKnight)
Subject:  Microsoft C6 prob in OS/2
Reply-To: doug@shako.Colorado.EDU (Doug McKnight)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 15:41:43 GMT


Is there a problem with C6 under OS/2.
I installed it and had repeatable failures with "access sharing  violation,
Abort Retry Fail" or some such like every time i tried a build.

Is this a known problem? It there a fix. 
Tha machine is a clone 486 with adaptec 1522 scsi.
Douglas
From: brooke@cco.caltech.edu (Brooke Paul Anderson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: TE/2's slow screen display in vt100 emulation
Date: 7 Oct 1992 09:09:54 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

I think text routines are slow in windowed OS/2 sessions.  Try TE/2
in full-screen mode -- it is a lot faster.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: 880506s@dragon.acadiau.ca (James R. Skinner)
Subject: Mouse in Emacs
Organization: Acadia University
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 20:25:36 GMT

	
	Now that I have my alt key mapped as the Meta key in Emacs, I am
wondering if there is any way to add mouse support?  I know MicroEmacs has
mouse support, which I beleive Kai Uew Rommel added.  Anybody have it working
in the full port of emacs?

Thanks, 
James

-- 

-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
        James Robie Skinner        |     Jodrey School of Computer Science        James.Skinner@dragon.acadiau.ca  |  Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada
-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
From: hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: perl for OS/2
Date: 13 Oct 92 16:38:23 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Auburn University, AL

In article <1bd8osINNrts@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>, ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca (ochealth) writes:
> In article <1992Oct12.190259.15227@cs.ucla.edu> balke@maui.cs.ucla.edu (Alexander A. Balke) writes:
>>I am trying to find a version of PERL for OS/2 which was compiled using 
>>the large memory model.  Any help would be appreciated.
>[ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca gives pointer to 32-bit version]

If you really mean to say that you need a OS/2 1.x or MSDOS version of
perl, try ftp-os2.nmsu.edu in pub/os2/all/gnu/. This port was done by
Chen and Rommel with Microsoft C (large model). It is not as current as the
port mentioned by ochealth, and I know very little about perl.

--Darrel Hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Organization: European Academic Research Network (EARN)
Date: Thursday, 15 Oct 1992 15:42:23 GMT
From: Turgut Kalfaoglu <TURGUT@FRMOP11.BITNET>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Sound cards for OS/2

Try any game that has good music -- it plays well under Soundblaster
under OS/2.. Perhaps you need new player software...  -turgut
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.msdos.4dos
From: clemens@faui8a.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Clemens Beckstein)
Subject: Rev D uploads to ftp-os2.nmsu.edu
Organization: Regionales Rechenzentrum Erlangen
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 18:03:49 GMT


Since everybody seems to wait for this:

I just have uploaded the new Revision D of 4os2 1.0 and the
4dos 4.0 to 4dos 4.01 Rev D patch to ftp-os2.nmsu.edu directory
/pub/uploads

Have fun,

- Clemens
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: clemens@faui8a.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Clemens Beckstein)
Subject: gtak 2.01 compressed archiving
Organization: Regionales Rechenzentrum Erlangen
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 23:36:06 GMT


Well, I do not know what I am doing wrong: gtak 2.01 works just fine
on my Archive 2150S connected to an Adaptec 1542B --- as long as I do
not use compression (option -z of the included tar).

If I use -z then the tape is positoned the same way it is
before writing when I do not use compression, but then nothing is
written to the tape --- just read from disk (HD light flashing)
until sooner or later I get a
   buffer: write error
or    
   broken pipe 
error msg.

The Bios and the FD controller of the Adaptec is disabled (I have an
IDE controller with two Maxtor IDE drives and the floppies connected to
it).  8MB 386/33 machine with AMI Bios.  The Archive Streamer
has SCSI Id 2 and I install SCSITAPE.DMD with 
   BASEDEV=SCSITAPE.DMD TAPE$2 2 S0
(assuming that the Archive is a SCSI-1 device --- anybody knows better?)

What I am doing wrong?  Does compressed gtak work for you?

Cheers,

- Clemens
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Shredder vs. Trash (was: Why OS/2 **WILL** fail)
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:10:39 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Oct5.190708.3285@muddcs.claremont.edu> jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim) writes:
>1. Actual program/file
>2. Shadow of actual program/file
>3. Desktop program/file object (acts just like a shadow but isn't,
>                                and is slightly more configurable)
>4. Shadow of desktop program/file (serves no purpose other than to
>                                   save you the work of making another
>                                   desktop program/file object)
>
>Shredding the first deletes the real program/file.  Shredding any of
>the others has no effect on the real program/file, which is confusing
>since the third looks just like the first from the desktop.  Why not
>just add the configurability of the third to the second and get rid
>of the third and fourth altogether?

Not quite.  Number 3 (program object) is more like a batch file.  It
is a loader which establishes some run-time parameters and then
launches the app.  I agree that there should be some iconic indicator
that it's a reference and not the app, but it shouldn't be eliminated.
A shadow is meant to do nothing more than allow multiple access points
to the same object, which it does very well.

I suggest that program reference objects do something like draw a
colored rectangle around its icon or something like that.  
-- 
David Charlap         |"there aren't 50,000 things for which it's worth writing
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu| software; and the computer industry doesn't have enough
----------------------+ programmers to create that much good software.
Therefore, most of it must be worthless" -- Boris Beizer "The Frozen Keyboard"
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: ced@APOLLO.HP.COM (Carl Davidson)
Subject: UPDATE: Quattro Pro for Windows GP fault in seamless mode
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 21:24:45 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Chelmsford, MA

Here's the latest on the GP fault you get when you try to run 
Quattro Pro for Windows in seamless mode:

    This afternoon IBM called and told me that the problem is fixed in
    the service pack that will be available next week. This is the 
    pack that has bugfixes and the 32-bit GRE, but not Win3.1. The 
    guy who called said that it is a recent fix, so folks with the
    beta code might still see this problem. 

I intend to obtain and install the service pack as soon as it's available.
I'll post again after I've tested.

-- 
Carl Davidson  (508) 436-4361  |
Chelmsford System Software Lab | Microkernels: Where less is more.
The Hewlett-Packard Company    | 
DOMAIN: ced@apollo.hp.com      |
From: tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Todd Henderson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Copying from pmqvt?  How to do it?
Date: 13 Oct 92 18:56:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.Bw2py1.5G4
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

I'm in the process of trying out PM_QVT from the net.  I would like to
be able to copy from the session.  I noticed the Edit/Copy option, but
can't seem to highlight any text to copy.  How do you highlight text
to copy?

Thanks,

Todd
tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu
From: twong@civil.ubc.ca (Thomas Wong)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Sound cards for OS/2
Date: 14 Oct 1992 18:47:09 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Civil Engineering, U.B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: sam.civil.ubc.ca

In the comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard newsgroup, someone said that he was
able to run the Gravis Ultrasound under DOS windows just fine. And there
was also a report that Gravis will be coming out with a legitimate OS/2
driver soon (but more phone calls telling Gravis that we're serious
about wanting an OS/2 driver might speed things up :) ). And of course
once there is an Ultrasound driver, OS/2 will be able to use the
Ultrasound to its full potential, instead of just using FM stereo like
the SoundBlaster, Adlib, PAS....etc.

Thomas.
From: gt0449a@prism.gatech.EDU (Rob Coleman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Ami Pro 3.0 on OS/2 2.0
Date: 8 Oct 92 15:46:55 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

>I am thinking about purchasing Ami Pro 3.0 for windows, but I would like
>to use it under OS/2 2.0. Are there any special problems or settings I
>should know about? I think Ami Pro 3.0 does not use Windows 3.1 features.
>Am I correct?

I was unable to get the install program to work under OS/2.  I have a
FAT parition mapped to drive D: under OS/2, and no matter what I typed
as to the drive specification for installing ATM, it tried to install on
drive C:.  Naturally, there is not enough room on C: (my OS/2 HPFS
partition, 35 megs), so the installation quits.  I haven't hunted around
much to see if there is a way to install Ami Pro and leave an older
version of ATM running.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: wiegand@rtsg.mot.com (Robert Wiegand)
Subject: Re: Printing in WordPerfect for Windows
Reply-To: motcid!wiegand@uunet.uu.net
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 15:25:41 GMT

u1056905@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au writes:

>Hi all,

>I am sure this has been answered before, but I missed it, so sorry for asking
>again...

>I try to print with WordPerfect for Windows using the WordPerfect Driver
>(rather than the Windows driver). I have a printer connected to LPT1.
>Whenever I send to the printer, WP sends the stuff to my OS2 Printer object,
>rather than the Print Manager for Win-OS2.
>I have seen a reply to a similar post that advised changing the
>PORT from "LPT1" to "LPT1:" or "LPT1.OS2".   However, WP does not let

I haven't done this, so this is just a guess.
Try setting the output port to "file" and give "LPT1:" as the file name.

>you type in the port, rather you can choose your port from a list of
>available ones (LPT*, COM*, File).
>Also, when I try to change from the WordPerfect Driver to the Windows Driver,
>Win-OS2 just freezes, and I have to kill the session.

>I would prefer a mailed reply rather than a post, as I am a bit busy with
>uni work at the moment, and don't have time to follow the OS2 groups :(
>If there's enough interest, I will post a summary.

>Thanks in advance. Assi.
>u1056905@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Wiegand - Motorola Inc.
motcid!wiegand@uunet.uu.net            uunet!motcid!wiegand
Disclamer: I didn't do it - I was somewhere else at the time.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: stidolph@leland.Stanford.EDU (Wayne Stidolph)
Subject: Stanford Graphics 2.0 on OS/2?
Reply-To: stidolph%gtewd.dnet@gte.com
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 05:21:24 GMT

I'm about to buy a technical graphing program, and I need to keep the
cost down (maybe US$600 max). I presently have specified a DOS program,
intending to run it under OS/2 v2. However, a Windows program caught my
eye: Stanford Graphics. The sales fellow who answered their phone has no
idea whether it will run in a WINOS session - he's pretty sure it
requires Enhanced Mode, but he doesn't know why... if anybody has tried
it, could you drop me a short note? Thanks!

PS - I'm open to suggestions, of course! Well, *some* suggestions :)
  Wayne

-- 
Wayne  stidolph@gtewd.mtv.gsc.gte.com or stidolph@leland.stanford.edu 
What I say is from me only. I try to be accurate, but I make mistakes: sorry.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: gary@access.digex.com (Gary L. Bobzien)
Subject: 5250 Emulation under OS/2 2.0
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 12:04:57 GMT

Has anyone used an IBM 5250 Emulation card to connect to a System/38 and
run the software under OS/2 2.0? I've installed the card and IBM software, 
but everytime I run it, the system crashes; often with different symptoms.

I eagerly look forward to any assistance that may be provided.

Thank you,
Gary Bobzien

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: dbarker@spang.Camosun.BC.CA (Deryk Barker)
Subject: Re: Ami Pro 3.0 on OS/2 2.0
Organization: Camosun College, Victoria B.C, Canada
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 18:29:17 GMT

In article <70453@hydra.gatech.EDU> gt0449a@prism.gatech.EDU (Rob Coleman) writes:
>>I am thinking about purchasing Ami Pro 3.0 for windows, but I would like
>>to use it under OS/2 2.0. Are there any special problems or settings I
>>should know about? I think Ami Pro 3.0 does not use Windows 3.1 features.
>>Am I correct?
>
>I was unable to get the install program to work under OS/2.  I have a
>FAT parition mapped to drive D: under OS/2, and no matter what I typed
>as to the drive specification for installing ATM, it tried to install on
>drive C:.  Naturally, there is not enough room on C: (my OS/2 HPFS
>partition, 35 megs), so the installation quits.  I haven't hunted around
>much to see if there is a way to install Ami Pro and leave an older
>version of ATM running.

Hmmmm, I'm running Ami Pro 2.0 and intending to move to OS/2 any
day.... BTW there is supposed to be an OS/2 version appearing soon.
Anyone have any info on pricing, upgrade offers, etc.?

Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept., Camosun College, Victoria B.C.


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: stoen@katana.pcpd.hou.compaq.com (Rick Stoen)
Subject: MMPM Questions
Organization: Compaq Computer Corporation
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 01:08:21 GMT

I received the OS/2 Development CD the other day and one of the things
I decided to try and play around with was MMPM. I got it installed OK,
but I couldn't seem to find any documentation on the CD about it. My
first question is does it work with the internal PC speaker or do I
need to buy a sound card. If I need to buy a soundcard what options do
I have? The only one I know of that has OS/2 drivers (beta) is the
SoundBlaster.

My other question was, assuming I get it to work somehow what does it
do? Can I define "trigger" events to play sounds like with Windows?

========================================================================
|  Rick Stoen                      |      Phone: (713) 374-4514        |
|  Compaq Computer Corporation     |      EMail: stoen@compaq.com      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|      Work hard, rock hard, eat hard, sleep hard, grow big,           |
|      and wear glases if you need 'em...                              |
|                                The Webb Wilder Credo                 |
========================================================================
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are my own, and do not reflect
            those of my employer.
From: lclarke@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Lee Clarke)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: DOS -> WINOS2 settings
Keywords: winos2 dos
Date: 8 Oct 92 02:58:57 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

When I click on WINOS2 Full Screen, the Open, Settings, Session,
I see only choices for a DOS session. Shouldn't it be WINOS2?
And if so, how to change it. TIA
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim)
Subject: Re: MOD player for OS/2 2.0?
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 05:02:21 GMT

jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim) writes:

>I'll nab a copy from my friend's BBS and put it on ftp-os2.nmsu.edu
>first chance I get.  The guy who wrote it is from Germany or thereabouts
>and calls his BBS about once a month.  I hear he's also working on
>making WOWII more multitasking-friendly.  Expect it sometime tonight
>unless I post otherwise.

Bad news.  MTMOD got nuked to make room for OS/2 files (my friend's
BBS suffered a hard drive failure a while back making things rather
cramped).  Unless somebody else has a copy of it, you'll all have to
wait for an OS/2 MOD player, or that guy from Germany to call back.
-- 
John H. Kim                 | (This space to be filled when I
jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu | think of something very clever 
uunet!jarthur!jokim         | to use as a disclaimer)