From: bavafa@netcom.com (Hooshyar Naraghi)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian
Subject: God is copyrighted
Date: 26 Sep 92 06:53:07 GMT
Organization: God (c) Any year, any person

*****  WARNING:  My dear friend today at SCI lunch told me my articles are
so long that at few times while reading them at work, he was not able to
finish his project or whatever to the point of almost being fired.  OK, 
Macky jAn (No, no, this is not our Mack).  I am warning you, this is a long
article.  Have your 'n' key handy just in case.


In article <1992Sep25.160412.11626@wuecl.wustl.edu> seyyed@wuee1.wustl.edu
(Seyyed Mahdavian) writes:

>Mahin insulted "God" (and it's not her first time).

And, it will not be her last time either.  After all she insulted "God" and
not Alluh.  You are the self-appointed custodian of Alluh, not God.  Per
your other article, it was YOUR God whom you are protecting.  If you have
copyrighted your God, which I would not believe until you produce your
copyright permits, you have no right to EXTEND it to all Gods.

God means different thing to different people.  Jews believe in 'yAvAh,'
Buddhists believe in Karma, Zoroasterians believe in AhurA-mazdA, Christians
believe in Father and Son, and it is my understanding that their concept of
God is very different from that of yours.  They specially do not recognize
Alluh as a God to begin with.  Remember that their God said that he was
right and therefore the followers sincerely believe that their God KNOWS
better than any other person.

>Yes I called her stupid, and I don't think that I insulted her. It's really
>the truth and I honestly regret that.

No, no!  You ought to apologize.  But, you are no MAN to do that.  Not a
fat chance for you to apologize in a public forum like sci.  Seyyed let's
face it, you don't have the necessary riquirements to do it.  You are so
weak, even weaker than a woman.

>If I told her "you are a pig", that
>would be an insult (to the pig of course), because she is not really a pig.

Seyyed, your line of thinking is bankrupt.  It is the most disgusting I
have ever read in a public forum.  Why don't you go and wash your mouth?

>Yes I also asked her to shut up because with her level of intelligence,
>if I asked her to remain silent in a more gentle fashion, she wouldn't have 
>understood.

How the hell [(c) 92, Zafar Minhas] did you know that if you had said your
pathetic view in a more _gentle_ fashion she wouldn't have understood?  
YOUR God told you so?  And, suppose she continued not to remain silent.
To me it means although you used non-gentle (read unkind) approach to make
her understand, it still did not work.  So your practice of making people
understand you is good for toilet tube [it is good for nothing, because it
did not produce the desired objective of making a person understood -HFN].

>It's in "her" benefit to remain silent.

And, it's to sci benefit that you shut up [(c) 92, Seyyed] too.  I am right
because MY God told me so.  If I ask you to remain silent in a more gentle
fashion, you wouldn't understand.  Believe me I am 100% sure of this fact
becuase MY God told me, and he is always right.  So will you go away and
leave us alone?

===================  For freedom of speech lovers only  ====================
This is by no means to ask Seyyed not to post to sci.  This line of
reasoning is employed to demonstrate the bankrupcy of the reason itself.
He must continue to post to remind us how HIS God thinks.
============================================================================

>>Too bad you live now. 50 years ago the Gestapo had many openings for 
>>people like you.  Even your own prophet says that all people are
>>equal like the teeth of a comb.  Or maybe your comb is different
>>or has broken teeth? 
>
>The Prophet(s) said: "ennA akramakom end-allah atghAkom". A poor
>translation could be: "Surely the dearest of you people to God, is
>tho most virtuous one". So there *is* a difference between people.

You bet, sir.  That's why only people with your line of thinking could
possibly be recruited to work for Gestapo [(c) 92, Farshid Moussavi].
You think Gestapo would have hired nice people?  No way, because THEIR
God told them so, and they did it as instructed.  Their God was RIGHT, and
his followers KNEW, because their God told them so.  Can you dig this one?

>>                     YOU think that your religion is the rightest.
>
>It's not that I imagine something. God himself says so several times
>in Qur'an.

Yes, you are imagining and you have a very distorted imagination about God.
Please refrain from using the word God.  In Qur'an it is Alluh, not God.
As for what YOUR copyrighted Alluh says in Qur'an, it is only in Qur'an.
Christian God says Christianity is the rightest religion.  Father says so
several times in the New Tastament.

>Now tell me, who knows better what is right and what is wrong? 

That's a piece of cake, Seyyed.  Even I can answer the above question as 
follows:

MY God :-).  MY God KNOWS better what is right and what is wrong.  MY God
told me you are wrong.  MY God also told me that it was right to ask you
to shut up.  I KNOW that MY God is right, beacause he says so several times
in the Holy Book.

>Who gave you the ability to distinguish between right and wrong?

MY God, not yours.  Please read previous paragraph.

>1) Why is that in a country like England, it is "against the law" for
>   someone to insult christianity in public? Anyone who does so, will
>   be prosecuted and punished.

Beacuse England is evil according to your leader's understanding.

>2) Why is that in the United State, someone in the army who refuses to
>   go to the Gulf war, i.e. refuses to "kill" or to cooperate in killing,
>   is arrested and punished?

Because USA is the Great Satan according to your leader's understanding.

>3) Why is that a General in the US army who talked too much and gave
>   some information to the general audience is denounced and punished?

Because that information can "physically" harm the country.

>If you really are open minded and have a minimum of intelligence, it
>shouldn't be hard to see that there is no such thing as "absolute
>freedom of speech".

You are right here.  :-)  But, there is enough photonic portion of this
so called freedom of speech left to ask you to shut up.

Thanks God.  MY God, not YOURS.  :-)

Regards,
Hooshyar F. Naraghi
bavafa@netcom.com
(415) 322-8056
Newsgroups: soc.culture.iranian