HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Wed, 9 Sep 1992 15:21:35 BST
From:         Kerr Avon <lcc@WIN.ICL.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: White Sands

>From: Rick Francis <C47805NF@WUVMD.BITNET>
>
>Did anyone else see this film?  It starred Willem Dafoe as a small-town
>sheriff who gets in over his head when he tries to solve a murder, and
>winds up facing Mickey Rourke, who represents...  a large, powerful
>organization.  Don't wanna give that away.
>
>Anyway, I haven't seen ANY mention of the movie, which I kinda liked.

Rick, I saw the film last week while I was home in Glasgow.  It was
OK.  I like Dafoe a lot as an actor, and even Mickey Rourke was
bearable for a change (actually, that's a bit unfair; I loved _Angel
Heart_).  Mary-Elisabeth Mastrantonio (sp?) was OK too.  The plot was
a bit contrived and confusing.  Although I managed to keep track
of who was who, and who was doing what to who else, something I can
never figure out in this kind of film is why the FBI and the CIA
are always trying to shoot each other.  Anyone?  Maybe I'm just
maive, but aren't they on the same side?  I also had a problem
understanding the black FBI agent's motives.

Like I said, it was OK.  I'd give it 0 on a scale of -5 to 5.

I also saw _Knight Moves_ starring Christopher Lambert and Tom Skerrit(?).
I liked it better.  Good ol' suspense/thriller, even though they do cheat
a little by pulling a very minor character out of the background as the
bad guy.  Personally, I kept waiting for Lambert to pull out a sword and
for Sean Connery to appear...   8-)
_Knight Moves_ gets a high 1 on the same scale.

			Liam.
			====-
                                   *"What say you, Blackadder, I sing
     KERR AVON    |   Work: ICL,   *   a song to keep our spirits up?"
 aka Liam Cairney |Reading, England*"That depends whether you want the
  All e-mail to:- | Home: Glasgow, *   slop bucket over your head or
lcc@win.icl.co.uk |    Scotland    *   not."
                                   *          -- Melchett & Blackadder
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1992 12:53:23 -0500
From:         FAC_JCLARK@JMUVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Final Analsysis of Kurasawa

Well, no, Gere can't technically be the first western actor in a Kurosawa
film: that would have to be Martin Scorcese (albeit fleetingly) in _Akira
Kurosawa's Dreams_.  Unless he doesn't count 'cause he's really a director!
Jeff Clark  (P.S. But he _has_ acted before, especially his own work--e.g.,
Taxi Driver...)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-To: CINEMA-L@AMERICAN.EDU
X-Vms-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AMERICAN.EDU"
X-Vms-Cc: PGIORDANO
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Mon, 14 Sep 1992 13:00:00 EDT
From:         Peter.Giordano@WILLIAMS.EDU
Subject:      Re: Bad Bette Davis movie...

Yes SATAN MET A LADY is terrible (I asked the question "Is there a bad
Bette Davis movie) - but it's so bad it's quite entertaining.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1992 11:55:01 -0500
From:         FAC_JCLARK@JMUVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: wide screen movies on TV (was INTOLERANCE)

And a reply to Michael Kerbel: Bravo on your non-Scope film examples, too!
You've hit another button: overall, Scorcese probably my favorite filmmaker.
Not so surprising, perhaps... Jeff Clark
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Organization: Penn State University / CES & CE
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Sep 1992 09:37:00 EST
Reply-To:     ELGFROEHRER@PSUCES
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was ELGFROEHRER@PSULIAS
From:         ELGFROEHRER@PSUCES.BITNET
Subject:      Re: orthographic apostasy

                  I N T E R O F F I C E   M E M O R A N D U M

                                        Date:     11-Sep-1992 09:27am DST
                                        From:     Ellen L. Gfroehrer
                                                  ELGFROEHRER
                                        Dept:     Independent Learning
                                        Tel No:   (814) 865-5403

TO:  VMSMail User _IN%"CINEMA-L           ( _IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET" )

CC:  _AUVM.BITNET"::IN%"AFCOLYER@PSULIAS.BITNET"
CC:  _AUVM.BITNET":: IN%"ELGFROEHRER@PSULIAS.BITNET"
CC:  _AUVM.BITNET":: IN%"TJMCKENNA@PSULIAS.BITNET"

Subject: RE: orthographic apostasy

kjf:
...actually, that did happened to me.  Consequently, the sad little stumps of
my digits have trouble hitting the "A" key, thus the misspelling of words like
grammar.  You sound all too familiar with this nun, did she transfer to your
school after she scarred the children of St. Boniface for life?

mea maxima culpa,
Ellen

P.S. So as not to ruffle any feathers...er...did you ever see that movie with
Ingrid Bergman called "The Nun Story?"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:16:41 -0500
From:         FAC_JCLARK@JMUVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Blade Runner (Director's Cut)

In agreement with Chris C, I'm also puzzled as to why/how Scott's Deckard
could be a replicant when he's obviously so vulnerable and unsuperhuman during
the course of the film. Would he being some new, inferior kind of replicant?
And what would be the point of the facile irony?  It certainly adds no depth
to Dick's book, which was philosophically more complex....  Jeff Clark
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Sep 1992 12:44:35 EST
From:         mark beals <ITNR500@INDYCMS.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Star Wars 4 ( What about it ? ).
              10 Sep 1992 14:55:27 -0400 from <SCHULTZ@UFRJMCP1>

As I heard it, George has written the next three movies, and has plans
to begin production on the first one sometime soon.  He said that we should
see them all before 1997.  These three movies are the first three installments
of the nine part series.  The only remaining characters will be the androids
since it takes place before the main characters were born.  It will be about
how young Darth Vador was turned to the dark side.  "Hier to the Empire" is
not part of this series.  He said that he will work on the final three
episodes, but he will not do the movies.  He may let someone else take over.
This is what I heard.
                     --q
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"CINEMA-L@AUVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 12:19:37 -0500
From:         FAC_JCLARK@JMUVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: wide screen movies on TV (was INTOLERANCE)

Louis,
To add to what Michael K. has written in response--and to indulge a button
of mine that your comments happen to've pressed!--let me add the following.

Even post-TV-or-home-video films that were shot with these formats in mind
and aren't truly widescreen in their more modest aspect ratios, can still
suffer from TV cropping.  Yes, the picture and its story can remain intel-
ligible in its essentials, but you _can_ lose important detail beyond the
cropped edges--even detail that emerges from the overall picture composition,
properly presented.  These things, of course, are part of the overall esthetic
experience of the film. (So are seeing it in a theatre or on home video--even
in a letterboxed laserdisc: aspects of experience might be closed off or opened
up, depending on your viewing venue, but this probably varies in complex ways
that have to be taken film by film rather than in terms of "useful generaliza-
tions.")

All in all, I tend to be a hardnosed hardliner on film.  I love it for entertain
   ment and indiscrimiately (often), but I also take it seriously enough to want
    torespect its esthetic integrity as much as possible as a viewer.  So even w
   ith
non-widescreen films (say, about a 1.66-1.85:1 or thereabouts aspect ratio) I'd
prefer to have a letterboxed video version available, whether or not there's a
TV-boxed version also.  Yes, there's lots of dross (including things I not so
guiltily love...)--films whose makers have little or no sense of composition,
or may use it in ways superfluous to whatever merits the content have, etc.--
but _I_ want to make that decision as to which films are that way.  I don't want
   any distributor, studio, broadcaster and whatnot doing it.

So there!  My button's returned (click...) to its normal position; end of mini-
sermon.  This delivered in feisty good humor, though you may not be able to
sense it....

Jeff Clark
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Sat, 12 Sep 1992 00:20:01 EDT
From:         ST201714@BROWNVM.BITNET
Subject:      Blade Runner (Is he a Replicant?)

Regarding the idea of Deckard being a replicant himself, this wouldn't be the
first time a director has changed a writer's story to make a more interesting
one.  It's been awhile since I've seen the movie and read "Do Android Dream of
Electric Sheep" but I seem to recall there being a police officer in the book
who was a replicant programmed to think he was real.  His credibility is
strengthened by the fact that he retires replicants for a living.  Maybe Ridley
 Scott combined the two characters to create a more intriguing Decker?
    Also, since I have not seen the Director's cut, but am well aware of its
content, I want to know how Gaff knows about the unicorn dream?  Also, if
Deckard was a replicant, wouldn't Gaff have an obligation to "retire" him also?
   This all reminds me of another Philip K. Dick - based movie, _Total Recall_.
Was it real, or a dream?  I think it's best just to leave it alone.  It can be
argued both ways, and like that movie, we will never know for sure.  Keep the
topic going. I'm going insane just thinking about it now!

                                          -Eduardo
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.cinema-l
Date:         Sun, 13 Sep 1992 08:08:36 EDT
From:         "Michelle Pfeiffer's Purrvert (Yee,
              Eugene)" <YEE@DICKINSN.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: _Fried Green Tomatoes_

Another question:  what is the name of Kathy Bates' character?
From: alan@curta.cc.columbia.edu (Alan Crosswell)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: VM TCP V2R1 + BTI ELC2 goes out to lunch
Date: 15 Sep 92 23:46:19 GMT
Organization: Columbia University

We've been seeing a number of TCPIP failures (like once or twice a week)  
where TCP appears to be dead in the water from the user's point of view.  
Asking it what it's up to with NETSTAT shows that it thinks things are 
fine.  We also get wierd stuff in RTMESA like this:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
----+| VM/ESA CPU9121 SERIAL 140947   53M DATE 09/15/92 START 19:33:37 END  
19:34:26 ||           *                                                                   
|| <USERID> %CPU %CP %EM ISEC PAG  WSS  RES   UR PGES SHARE VMSIZE  
TYP,CHR,STAT ||*TCPIP     4.0 1.9 2.0   24 .00 1578 1585   .0   45  6000     
14M VUB,QDS,DORM |

What's a DORM state mean?

and... 

---------------------------------------------------------------------+---- 
----+|    09/15/92  RTM VM/ESA INTERVAL ANALYSIS LOG ----->    19:34:54     
| ACTION  
|+---------------------------------------------------------------------+-- 
------+|  1) EXCESSIVE DEVICE PERCENT UTILIZATON:  84%  3380-0360             
|   22   ||  2) EXCESSIVE DEVICE PERCENT UTILIZATON: 148%  AA01-0B20             
|   22   ||  3)  QUEUEING IN CHANNEL SUBSYSTEM:  13.6S    AA01-0B20              
|   23   ||  4) EXCESSIVE DEVICE PERCENT UTILIZATON:  98%  AA01-0B30             
|   22   |

.. where B20 and B30 are our two BTI ELC-2's (one is the live TCPIP and
the other is the test TCPIPV machine).

I even tried swapping B20 and B30 between the two TCPIP machines to
see if the problem would move, but it appears to still be happening
(or it could be a fluke).

Hardware/software configuration is:

ES/9121 running PR/SM with our LPAR having:

VM/ESA Release 1, service level 0101
CMS Level 7, Service Level 101
VM TCP/IP V2R1
two BTI ELC-2's at address B20-21 and B30-31 (don't know the microcode
level)

Don't know what if any service has been put on TCP, but I think it's
still what came pre-installed from IBM when we got ESA from them.

Before I go crazy with traces and all, I wanted to touch base with this
group and see if anyone had seen this behavior before.

Oh yeah, the usual fix is to just reset the device and restart TCPIP.

Thanks for any pointers!
/a
From: mgb@csn.org (Michael Barton)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Re: Abend in XLIB when main program is FORTRAN
Date: 11 Sep 92 16:22:40 GMT
Followup-To: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Organization: csn.org

In article <19920911082150SEB1525@MVS.draper.com>, SEB1525@MVS.draper.com
(Steve Bacher) wrote:
> 
> .....
> 
> Now it's true that one would never run an X-Windows client from
> foreground TSO - or is it?  Not necessarily. 

I concur. There are numerous instances (graphics display programs, for
example), when a TSO user may want to fire up a X-Windows client to
perform a graphics based function on his workstation (through which he
used tn3270 or the like to get to the MVS system).

/---------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/ Michael Barton                                                           
/
/ Engineering Software Solutions, Inc.                                     
/
/ 814 Glenwood Drive, Lafayette, Colorado 80026                            
/
/ (303) 441-9346                                                           
/
/ mgb@csn.org                                                              
/
/---------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  JNET%"ibmtcp-l@pucc"
Original_cc:  JURASCHEK
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 14 Sep 1992 17:46:00 EST
From:         "David F. Juraschek" <JURASCHEK@GMUVAX.BITNET>
Subject:      IBM TCP/IP - ESA - LPSERVE Problem

Please reply via E-Mail - I do not subscribe to this Bitnet List!

When users try to access a printer via LPR from PC's (CUTCP), UNIX or
VMS (that VMS, not MVS or multiple VMs), they receive errors indicating
that the SERVER CONNECTION FAILED.

We run LPSERVE as a TCPIP V2.2 started task on an MVS/ESA system.

MVS users can LPR fine out from our IBM to printers attached to other
machines (UNIX, VMS or whatever), however, users can't go the opposite route
INTO the IBM.

A look at our LPSERVE in DEBUG mode shows a:
    FAILED TO OPEN "R1AE0E2A dfA045LU"
followed by a:
    Terminanting connection 1 Failed to open file
in the LPSERVE LOG just before the connection to the end-user is closed.

I have turned off RACF in the LPD.CONFIG file.  The effect with RACF on is
the same but also a
    FAILED TO OPEN "R1AE0E2A SITE"

So, the problem appears to have nothing to do with RACF or such.

My UNIX guru says that this failed file appears to be the spool file name on
the sending system.  This can't be since PC's have no spool files.

So, 1) what the fat is this file which is failing to open?
       and, the big question ...
    2) how do I get IBM LPD to allow LPR's from other TCP/IP sources?

Incidentally, the FOR=user_id and PASS=password options indicated in the
TCP/IP V2R2 for MVS Planning and Customization manual in the LPSERVE chapter
under the "Controlling LPSERVE from other Systems" section are not recognized
on any LPR we have at GMU.  We are exceptionally current with our UNIX and
VMS systems as well as with CUTCP (PC TCP/IP).  Did IBM make these "options"
up hoping to force them on other TCP/IP implementers?  They certainly are
NOT LPD.CONFIG file options. (But, that, Little Adam is another story.)


Help, Please.

-David Juraschek
 George Mason University
 DAVEJ@GMUVAX.BITNET  (Bitnet)   or   davej@gmuvax.gmu.edu (internet)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: NET%"ibmtcp-l%pucc.bitnet@pucc.princeton.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 08:24:00 EST
From:         KDICKEY@GMR.COM
Subject:      MVS Gopher

Hello,

Does anyone know of an implementation of Gopher for MVS (both server and
client)?

Thanks,
Keith Dickey                kdickey@cmsa.gmr.com
Advanced Computing Center,  Electronic Data Systems
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: University of Kentucky Computing Center
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 10:42:14 EDT
From:         "Collins, Herman" <SYSHERM@UKCC.UKY.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Abend in TCPIP virtual machine

>We are running FAL 2.2 here.  Our TCPIP virtual machine abended in a
>way that we haven't seen before.  A piece of the console log is included
>below.  Level 2 said that one other site has reported the same problem.
>We're not sure what's causing it.  Has anyone else seen this?  Level 2
>had nothing else to tell me.
>
[very long series of tracebacks deleted]

This looks similar to a problem I reported.  I was told that another
customer had also reported it, and eventually it was given APAR PN27773,
which was INTRAN as of this morning.  Take a look at it.

                                    Herman Collins

128 McVey Hall                      Bitnet: SYSHERM@UKCC
University of Kentucky              Internet: sysherm@ukcc.uky.edu
Lexington, Ky.  40506-0045          Phone: 606-257-2256
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:        UK.AC.CAM.PHX;  7 SEP 92 18:17:43 BST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 7 Sep 1992 18:16:13 BST
From:         A Grant <AG129@PHOENIX.CAMBRIDGE.AC.UK>
Subject:      IUCV SEVER with KILL -9

I think I may have asked this before, but the problem is getting even
more irritating. Under some circumstances (and some of these are 100%
repeatable) when using IUCV sockets on MVS I get an IUCV SEVER with text
'KILL -9', "Fatal error in IUCV communication". There is little, if any,
information (e.g. log) to diagnose what is happening. Are there any
other socket users out there who are having these SEVERs?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1992 10:52:51 EDT
From:         Ron Lane <RONLANE@YKTVMV.BITNET>
Subject:      re: IUCV SEVER with KILL -9

>It may well be integrated into the base (at least, there is source, with
>helpful comments) but it isn't mentioned in the Programmer's Reference!
>I guess I'm supposed to be using the IUCVMINI/IUCVMCOM macros, for which
>(as far as I know) the only reference is Ron Lane's document. Has this
>information got into an orderable publication yet?

This document is Appendix A in the Version 2.2 Programmer's Reference.
Ron Lane
TCP/IP Development
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 09:54:00 EDT
From:         David Condrey 656-2733 <DAVIDC@CLEMSON.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: TCPV2R2-HAL w/8232 BTI controller version 26

On Tue, 8 Sep 1992 09:13:51 EDT TOSDRST@GE1VM.SCHDY.GE.COM said:
>  FYI... Perhaps to save someone else a 'surprise'.
>  'Unable to determine Home Address'
>  I received the following from Tom McCafferty of BTI...
>       (Thanks Tom for your prompt response)..
> That problem is in fact fixed in v2.6 of the ELC2 microcode. V2R2
> of HAL changed slightly in the manner in which it asked the box for
> it's Ethernet address at startup. 2.6 is needed to match the IBM change.

There was a change required for the move to 2.1, but I had not heard
anything about new microcode for 2.2. We have been running 2.2 for over
a month now on our ELC2's. Are you refering to standard 8232 or CETI
emulation?

While I am here, is anyone running CETI on their ELC2? At SHARE, Dan
Patel of IBM Raleigh did a talk onperformance benchmarks. He told me
after the session that people using BTI should be using CETI emulation
for better throughput. We originally ran CETI with V1 and a ELC1 box,
but moved because of the hot I/O problem that both BTI and IBM have
assured me has been fixed.

-David
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|David S. Condrey                   |   Your   | Bitnet: DAVIDC@CLEMSON       |
|MVS Systems Programmer/Tech Rep.   |    Ad    | Internet: DAVIDC@CLEMSON.EDU |
|Clemson University Computer Center |   Here   | Phone: (803) 656-2733        |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 15 Sep 1992 08:13:09 EDT
From:         TOSDRST@GE1VM.SCHDY.GE.COM
Subject:      HAL-V2R2 Snalink fails 'no more CONNblocks'

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From:
Subject: HAL-V2R2 Snalink fails 'no more CONNblocks'
 Thanks Gary and Gary,(what a great list!)
 FYI... see APAR PN24869...work around is to specify ALL SNALINK
 parms in the EXEC statement.
Don Smith, GE-Schenectady Megacenter

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From The Desk of Don Smith.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Princeton University, Network Systems, Class. 56
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 13:42:44 -0400
From:         gettes@PRINCETON.EDU
Subject:      Re: VMNFS mounting r/w minidisks
              08 Sep 92 12:09:49 -0500. <9209081720.AA18024@Princeton.EDU>

On Tue, 08 Sep 92 12:09:49 -0500 troth@ricevm1.rice.edu said:
> >QUESTION:  I want a r/w mount but dont't want any other uses on my
> >           unix box to have r/w access.  Is this a know problem? If
> >           so, what is fix status.  Anybody else seen this problem?

You can use the mountpw code supplied with FAL. This code allows for
the password stuff to get to a minidisk that has a password. This,
coupled with doing some interesting things with automounters, you could
conceivably provide this ability to the end user by mounting the VM
minidisk in their private directory (resolving most of the permissions
problems if the user is careful). I did some of this, but we do not
use AMD and other PD automounters, and it would seem that they would
do the job. The SUN automounter seems to be insufficient and does
not provide this ability.

In short, theoretically, this should be possible with some PD automounters.

/mrg
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 8 Sep 1992 09:14:37 CDT
From:         "Colegate Spinks" <ZCVS1@ADM.ANGELO.EDU>
Subject:      Where to get XTELNET

In recent discussion, remarks were made regarding the use of XTELNET
program by Denis. Could someone put me intouch with Denis, or were
I could get the XTELNET program.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
From: xmas@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Mark A. Stevens)
Subject: TIME Service from FAL
Organization: Educational Computing Network
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 15:01:06 GMT

Does anyone have code to have your system send the time via
TCP/whatever to someone wanting the time of day?  Apparently there is
such a service defined for TCP/IP, but I can't find it in V2R1 or
V2R2.  Thanks in advance.
-- 
Mark A. Stevens                           Phone:    708-534-0200
Systems Programmer                        Internet: xmas@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
Educational Computing Network             BITNET:   XMAS@ECNUXA.BITNET
Board of Governors Universities           VMSHARE:  ECE/MARK
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU