HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: s1172217@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au (Mark Smith)
Subject: Aus V SL
Organization: Monash University College Gippsland, Churchill, 3842, Australia
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 20:49:37 GMT

SL ended up 2/136  Mcdermott took 2 wickets, after being set 286 to win off a
minimum of 62 overs.

I must say I am surprised at SL, I would have thought they would have gone for
it, 4.5 runs per over is like a good one dayer target, and given that they are
1 nil down, I thought they would of least tried and maybe given up if wickets
started to fall to quickly.

Admittingly Border must have felt fairly safe because he declared the innings
closed setting SL such a target, he may have been hoping for a suicidal
approach from the Sri Lankans similar to the first test.

Another thing, on the highlights that I'm getting on the nightly news, I see
in the background very, VERY empty stands, what's the story?  5 years without
home cricket made the people lose interest or something.  A newspaper report
here said that a couple of days ago the crowd was about 55 of which 50 were
Aussies on a tour with former team manager Ian McDonald, I dare say this may
not be totally accurate but from the TV replays it didn't look far from the
mark at all
+------------------------------------+
|  Mark Smith.                       |
|  <s1172217@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au> |
|  Morwell, Victoria, Australia.     |
|  Monash Uni Gippsland Computing    |
+------------------------------------+
From: SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu (Spaceman Spiff)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: World's worst fielder
Date: 31 Aug 92 16:30:32 GMT
Organization: Penn State University

In article <1992Aug31.152100.13529@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk>, andrew@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk
(Andrew Walker) says:
>
>I kinda like these kinds of topics -  totally based around opinions and
>sure to bring about some interesting flames. Anyway, I thought since
>the world's best test fielders were being discussed it might be appropriate
>to start naming the worst! I think that the supporters of each test team
>should nominate the worst from their side that they can remember.
>
>I'll start the ball rolling with one from the England test team -
>
>        Devon (I'll dive for this, oops i've missed it again) Malcolm
>
for india, three names spring to mind: b. s. chandrashekhar, dilip doshi and
sandip patil.

Stay cool,
The Thinker

Cogito ergo potum                               I think therefore I drink
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SXK129@PSUVM.PSU.EDU                                Penn State University

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Silverman's Law:
        If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.
From: shafqat@neuro.duke.edu (Saad Shafqat)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Miandad, O Miandad.
Date: 26 Aug 92 04:15:56 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.



Can some kind soul complement/correct this list of Miandad's centuries ?

163 vs New Zealand at Lahore, 1976-77 (debut).
206 vs New Zealand at Karachi, 1976-77.
154* vs India at Faisalabad, 1978.
100 vs India at Karachi, 1978.
129 vs Australia at Perth, 1979.
150* vs New Zealand at Christchurch, 1981.
280* vs India at Hyderabad (Sindh), 1982-83.
260 vs England at the Oval, 1987.
105[?] vs the West Indies at ?, 1988.
119[?] vs the West Indies at ?, 1988.
271 vs New Zealand at Auckland, 198?


There are 12 others, I think.


-- 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: kumar@syd.dit.CSIRO.AU (V.R.Kumar)
Subject: Re: Border - A v. SL - Third Day.
Organization: CSIRO Division of Info Tech, Sydney, Australia
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 22:34:04 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.105625.1@economics.adelaide.edu.au> ecrjbruce@economics.adelaide.edu.au writes:
>Oh No! I completely left AB off Australia's first innings!
>
>Here is Border's contribution:
>
>A. Border                            b. Liyanage           13
>
>(Batting at No. 6)
>
>Don't worry AB, this isn't a hint that you shouldn't be around!
>
>Daniel.

well, Border is kept in the team just to break Gavaskar's
10,122 runs. I think Border is about 500-600 runs short of
the record. But the way he is playing makes one wonder whether
he will be able to break the record atleast in the next 10-15
matches !!!!. Its almost 4 years since Border has scored a 
century !!!


Cheers,

Ramkumar

-- 
 V.R.Kumar (Ramkumar Venkatachalam)                                 
 CSIRO, Division of Information Technology                         
 P.O.Box:1599, Macquarie Centre, North Ryde, NSW 2113, AUSTRALIA  

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: r2hmv@vm1.cc.uakron.edu
Subject: TV replays VS umpires
Organization: The University of Akron
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 18:31:43 GMT

Hi,
 
I read in a recent indian newspaper that TV action replays will be used
for the FIRST time in the history of Test Cricket to decide close calls
for Stumping, Run Outs and Hit wicket, in the series between South Africa
and India to be played in October.
 
I bet there would be lots of arguments for and against the above decision,
but apparently BCCI agreed on the suggestion by SAfricans. This will
probably be the most radical change since the introduction of Day/Night
matches by Kerry Packer. However, it still does not eliminate the possibility
of LBW controversies.
 
Love to hear from ye all !! (no personal mails please !!!)
 
Hari
 
The cricket hungry, but lonely in the USA.
From: andrew@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Andrew Walker)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: World's worst fielder
Date: 31 Aug 92 15:21:00 GMT
Organization: Glasgow University Computing Science Dept.


I kinda like these kinds of topics -  totally based around opinions and
sure to bring about some interesting flames. Anyway, I thought since
the world's best test fielders were being discussed it might be appropriate
to start naming the worst! I think that the supporters of each test team
should nominate the worst from their side that they can remember. 

I'll start the ball rolling with one from the England test team -

	Devon (I'll dive for this, oops i've missed it again) Malcolm

P.S. Don't say Phil Tuffnell until you have watched Devon in action. Tuffy
has improved since the last Ashes tour.


-- 
Andrew Walker: Department of Computing Science, The University, Glasgow G12 8QQ
Phone: (041) 339 8855 x 6044 		Fax: (041) 330 4913
E-mail: (JANet)      andrew@uk.ac.glasgow.dcs
  	(INTERNET)   andrew@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk
From: dgrove@axion.bt.co.uk (David Grove)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Accusations of Cheating
Date: 26 Aug 92 14:32:30 GMT
Reply-To: dgrove@axion.bt.co.uk (David Grove)
Organization: British Telecom Research Labs



I've already had a considerable response (via e-mail) to my request for
cricket phrases now accepted in the English vocab. so please keep them
coming and I'll post a summary.

If any of you also know of phrases in 'everyday' use originating from
other sports then I'd also be interested in those.

Thanks,

Dave Grove.

P.S. A starter that I believe is from American Football:

	You picked up the ball now run with it!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: pmc5@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Paul M Corballis)
Subject: Re: Accusations of Cheating
Reply-To: pmc5@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Paul M Corballis)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 15:59:13 GMT

In article <1992Aug26.153230@axion.bt.co.uk> dgrove@axion.bt.co.uk (David Grove) writes:
>
>
>I've already had a considerable response (via e-mail) to my request for
>cricket phrases now accepted in the English vocab. so please keep them
>coming and I'll post a summary.
>
>If any of you also know of phrases in 'everyday' use originating from
>other sports then I'd also be interested in those.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Dave Grove.
>
>P.S. A starter that I believe is from American Football:
>
>	You picked up the ball now run with it!!

Does Hat-trick come from cricket?  I've a feeling it does.

Cheers, Paul
From: vnesiah@usc.edu (Deep Third Man)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Aus vs SL Sthn province XI
Date: 26 Aug 1992 13:32:42 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

A british paper (I think it was The Guardian) reported that
in their first innings, the Aussies were tottering at 150 + for seven
before being rescued by Mark Waugh who scored a ton.  Chief wreckers for
the provincial team were Dulip Liyanage and Kapila Wijegunawardena (Medium to 
Fast-Medium at best).

The same paper also reported that the second England - Sri Lanka U-19 Test
was due to start in England today.  The first was a draw.

- Vasee
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Hundreds by Rival skippersy
From: sturumella@desire.wright.edu
Date: 31 Aug 92 00:34:56 EST
Organization: Wright State University 

In article <1992Aug30.113050.42663@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>, theagarajan@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
> 
> There is one other occasion when the rival captains scored century.
> 
> In 1979,at Bombay,  Gavaskar : 205
>                     Kallicharan : 187.
> 
> 
> 
it was in 1978 and not 1979. it was in the first innings of the
first test match in that series. It was a draw. 
srinivas
From: ratan@thebe.rutgers.edu (Santosh Ratan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: First Test - Score card - Australia v/s Sri Lanka
Date: 26 Aug 92 05:13:21 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <9c.a03=i6atN00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>, ahmed@uts.amdahl.com (Syed S. Ahmed) writes:
> In article <1992Aug25.182728.17849@engage.pko.dec.com> you write:
> >
>  How often have rival captains scored hundreds in the same test? 
> I can think of two cases:
> Gavakar (204) and Kalicharan (187) had done it in Bombay. Another one
> was the tied test in which Kapil and Border had hundreds.
> 
> Any more such instances ??


I am not sure about the following

Gooch and Azhar, when gooch scored 333
De silva and what's his name (NZ) when what's his name scored 299

I am sure there must have been tons of such instances.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: m0a1530@zeus.tamu.edu (ABBAS, MUSTAFA)
Subject: Re: Cricket Phrases
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 17:55:00 GMT

In article <1992Aug26.092944@axion.bt.co.uk>, dgrove@axion.bt.co.uk (David Grove) writes...
> 
> 
>In a recent conversation, I was discussing over the odd beer or eight the 
>number of cricket phrases/terms that have become accepted in everyday
>conversation.
> 
>We came up with the following: (please excuse the sexist nature of the 
>terms -:))
> 
>	1. That hit him for six.
>	2. He had a good innings.
>	3. My pen's run out (well, I did say we'd been drinking).
>	4. That stumped him.
	
	there is commom phrase in cricket which is -- 
		players have "GONE FOR TEA"

	If one says this as one word like "GOND-PHATI", it means, 
	in urdu and hindi, player have ripped asses or torn asses
	or fucked asses----something like that. I am sure some one 
	can come up witha better translation. 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ravi@alw.nih.gov (Ravi Boddapati)
Subject: Re: PAK, ENG  ONE DAYS ON PPV
Organization: National Inst. of Health, DCRT, CSL
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 20:10:58 GMT

In article <9208281738.AA03903@cs.utexas.edu>, aapfl6!zulfiqar@aapfl1.attmail.com writes:
|> 
|> 
|> 
|>         England vs Pakistan One Day Internationals would be televised
|>         in the state of New York on various cable companies on
|> 
|>                 FRIDAY    AUGUST 28   03:00 PM (ET)     4th MATCH
|>                 SATURDAY  AUGUST 29   03:00 PM (ET)     5th MATCH
|> 
|>         Call your cable company to sign up for these games on PPV.
|>         The charge for one game is $19.95
|> 

How much of the above $19.95 is going to be yours?  C'mon don't over do
the advertising.

-- Ravi

	Ravi Boddapati 			phone: (301) 496 0331 
	Building 12A, Room B57		uucp: uunet!nih-csl!ravi
	National Institutes of Health	Internet: ravi@alw.nih.gov
	Bethesda, MD 20892
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: u1065904@keystone.arch.unsw.edu.au (Michael Parkinson)
Subject: Re: Bradman Song (long)
Reply-To: u1065904@keystone.arch.unsw.edu.au
Organization: Faculty of Architecture, University of New South Wales
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 05:07:21 GMT

I remember another cricket song: 
	"I made a hundred in the backyard at Mum's"
Can't remember the words though.

POG
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Deloitte Bowler Rankings
Date: 31 Aug 92 20:56:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: vms.0095FEBD.9CF71400
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services

In article <1992Aug13.155154.24495@cs.yale.edu>, papadopoulos-dimitrios@CS.YALE.EDU (Dimitrios Papadopoulos) writes:
>In article <1992Aug13.004552.8244@vax.oxford.ac.uk> mcbean@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
>>For me the two surprises are Merv Hughes and Imran Khan.  Merv Hughes because
>>he doesn't impress me as the 5th best bowler in the world currently, and Imran
>>Khan, since I can't remeber hearing of him performing any amazing feats with
>>the ball recently (I may be wrong on this though).  By the way Imran also
>>appears in the top ten of the batting rankings.
>>
>
>These rankings have never made sense to me.I was recently seeing the 
>vedio of first match of India-England series of 1990.At that time 
>Atherton was ranked 6th in the world(ahead of Gooch(11th) and 
>Azhar(13th))and he had played just 8 test matches before that.

I am not sure about this but I think the ratings
include performances right from 1981, which would
help explain the fact why Imran is there but on
the other hand will contradict that of Atherton.

************************************************************
RAM            		       BULLS -93	

Politicians' statements tend to have a low specific gravity.
They carry less weight  than their volume would suggest.
		- Jonathan Miller
************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: raza@surya.ccs.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed)
Subject: Re: World's worst fielder
Organization: University of Western Ontario, London
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 23:41:45 GMT

In article <7jwpbp7z@csv.warwick.ac.uk> csuah@warwick.ac.uk (~WISP at CU~) writes:
>In article <dos105-010992074200@150.203.49.43> dos105@rsphy2.anu.edu.au (Darren O'Shaughnessy) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug31.165022.4209@athena.mit.edu>, nalin@athena.mit.edu
>>(Palitha Nalin Wikramanayake) wrote:
>>>
>>above that the majority of the Sri Lankans do need to work on their
>>fielding.
>
>As do the Pakistanis. If it hadn't been for some very poor fielding, and
>catching in particular, England would have taken a much worse beating.
>Exception must be made, though: Rashid Latif fielded very well throughout his
>stints as super-sub...
>
>The Wisp.
>-- 

Agree! pakistan never was a good fielding side, they perform well in the
field only in patches.


S.R.Raza.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: shamim@bellcore.com (Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4711,,21273)
Subject: Re: Cricketers and their books --Some musi
Reply-To: shamim@bellcore.com
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Morristown, NJ
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 19:03:24 GMT

In article 135832SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu,  Spaceman Spiff <SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>In article <1992Aug28.161818.1659@walter.bellcore.com>, shamim@bellcore.com
>(Shamim Naqvi,MRE-2E342,829-4711,,21273) says:
>>
>>BTW, Nadeem, in one of your postings you have referred to Sunny
>>Gavaskar as the "Little Master." I assume you know that Hanif Mohammad
>>used to be called the "Little Master."  Somehow I always think of Hanif
>>when I read this title and not Gavaskar.
>>
>these titles/nicknames tend to get passed down thru the ages. e.g. c. k. nayadu
> ken barrington and dilip vengsarkar have all been referred to as "colonel".
>"tiger" smith (w/k for warwickshire(?) in the early 20th century), "tiger"
>bill o'reilly and "tiger" pataudi is another example of this. i guess it
>depends upon which generation you belong to. when i was growing up, hanif had
>long since retired and gavaskar was at his peak, so i would think of gavaskar
>or viswanath when i heard the term "little master". of course, nationality is
>also an important factor.
>

Quite right. I did not mean to imply that anybody had an exclusive right to any nickname. 
	--SAN

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: jka@ipsa.reuter.com (Jan Arendtsz)
Subject: AU vs SL, 2nd OD
Organization: Reuters Information Services (Canada) Ltd., Toronto, Ontario
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 14:19:08 GMT

Colombo, Sept 4th, REUTER - Dean Jones scored an unbeaten half century but
ran out of partners as Australia struggled to 216 for seven in the second
one-day international against Sri Lanka on Friday.

Jones hit 59 off 79 balls and shared in stands of 62 with David Boon and 45 
with Alan Border but was also involved in two unnecessary run outs which 
checked Australia's run rate.

Scoreboard

AUSTRALIA

T. Moody	C Tillekeratne	B Gurusingha	17
M. Taylor	Run Out				30
D. Jones 	Not Out				59
D. Boon 	Run Out				35
M. Waugh	LBW		B Ramanayake	10
A. Border	C Kalpage	B Ramanayake	30
G. Matthews	C Tillekeratne	B Wick'singhe	01
I. Healy	Run Out				06
C. McDermott	Not Out				01

Extras						27

TOTAL (For 7 Wickets in 50 overs)	       216

Bowling

Ramanayake	10-2-43-2
Wickremasinghe  10-1-40-1
Hathurusighe	10-1-34-0
Gurusingha	 4-1-21-1
Ranatunga	 3-1-11-0
Anurasiri	 5-0-20-0
Kalpage		 8-0-31-0


Jan Arendtsz
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 09:29:45 EDT
From: Spaceman Spiff <SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: sorry

sorry for the wierd stuff that's been appearing from my a/c on rsc. our
newserver is getting a little adventurous.

Stay cool,
The Thinker

Cogito ergo potum                               I think therefore I drink
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SXK129@PSUVM.PSU.EDU                                Penn State University

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aphorism, n.:
        A concise, clever statement.
Afterism, n.:
        A concise, clever statement you don't think of until too late.
                -- James Alexander Thom
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ypotlap@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu ( )
Subject: 5 wkts/test career (was Hadlee's career)
Reply-To: ypotlap@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu ( )
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 14:07:06 GMT

I can think of two other bowlers with 5+ wkts/test average over their career:
Sid Barnes and Dennis Lillee.
Anybody else?
what about C. Grimmet?
Yasho.
From: aapfl6!zulfiqar@aapfl1.attmail.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: PAK, ENG  ONE DAYS ON PPV
Date: 28 Aug 1992 07:40:54 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu




        England vs Pakistan One Day Internationals would be televised
        in the state of New York on various cable companies on

                FRIDAY    AUGUST 28   03:00 PM (ET)     4th MATCH
                SATURDAY  AUGUST 29   03:00 PM (ET)     5th MATCH

        Call your cable company to sign up for these games on PPV.
        The charge for one game is $19.95
From: cctr123@csc.canterbury.ac.nz (Alan Murray, CSC Operations, Uni of Canty)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: First Test - Score card - Australia v/s Sri Lanka
Date: 27 Aug 92 10:33:50 +1200
Organization: University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

In article <Aug.26.01.13.20.1992.26386@thebe.rutgers.edu>, ratan@thebe.rutgers.edu (Santosh Ratan) writes:
> In article <9c.a03=i6atN00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>, ahmed@uts.amdahl.com (Syed S. Ahmed) writes:
>> In article <1992Aug25.182728.17849@engage.pko.dec.com> you write:
>> >
>>  How often have rival captains scored hundreds in the same test? 
>> I can think of two cases:
>> Gavakar (204) and Kalicharan (187) had done it in Bombay. Another one
>> was the tied test in which Kapil and Border had hundreds.
>> 
>> Any more such instances ??
> 
> 
> I am not sure about the following
> 
> Gooch and Azhar, when gooch scored 333
> De silva and what's his name (NZ) when what's his name scored 299

What's his name = Martin Crowe.

Sheeesh

Alan
From: ecrjbruce@economics.adelaide.edu.au
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Australia vs. Sri Lanka - Third Day.
Date: 31 Aug 92 04:15:00 GMT
Organization: Economics, University of Adelaide

*******************************************************************************
This is Daniel posting from a friend's account.
Please e-mail me at IN%"9207987H.Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au"
*******************************************************************************

Brief scores at the end of the third day of the second test between Australia
and Sri Lanka.

Australia 247    (Jones 77, Matthews 55 - to the rescue once again!)

Sri Lanka 9/258  (De Silva 85, McDermott 4/53)

I'll try to post a full scorecard of the match so far soon.

Today is a rest day.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: pmc5@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Paul M Corballis)
Subject: Re: First Test - Score card - Australia v/s Sri Lanka
Reply-To: pmc5@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Paul M Corballis)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 14:32:03 GMT

In article <Aug.26.01.13.20.1992.26386@thebe.rutgers.edu> ratan@thebe.rutgers.edu (Santosh Ratan) writes:
>In article <9c.a03=i6atN00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>, ahmed@uts.amdahl.com (Syed S. Ahmed) writes:
>> In article <1992Aug25.182728.17849@engage.pko.dec.com> you write:
>> >
>>  How often have rival captains scored hundreds in the same test? 
>> I can think of two cases:
>> Gavakar (204) and Kalicharan (187) had done it in Bombay. Another one
>> was the tied test in which Kapil and Border had hundreds.
>> 
>> Any more such instances ??
>
>
>I am not sure about the following
>
>Gooch and Azhar, when gooch scored 333
>De silva and what's his name (NZ) when what's his name scored 299
	      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Martin Crowe.  De Silva wasn't captain, though.  Runatunga (sp?) was, if
I recall correctly.

Cheers, Paul



Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: 10702830@eng2.eng.monash.edu.au (RAJIB DATTA)
Subject: Re: World's worst fielder
Organization: Faculty of Engineering, Monash University 
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 23:40:00 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.152100.13529@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk> andrew@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Andrew Walker) writes:
>From: andrew@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Andrew Walker)
>Subject: World's worst fielder
>Date: 31 Aug 92 15:21:00 GMT
>
>I kinda like these kinds of topics -  totally based around opinions and
>sure to bring about some interesting flames. Anyway, I thought since
>the world's best test fielders were being discussed it might be appropriate
>to start naming the worst! I think that the supporters of each test team
>should nominate the worst from their side that they can remember. 
>
>I'll start the ball rolling with one from the England test team -
>
>	Devon (I'll dive for this, oops i've missed it again) Malcolm
>
>P.S. Don't say Phil Tuffnell until you have watched Devon in action. Tuffy
>has improved since the last Ashes tour.
>
>
>-- 
>Andrew Walker: Department of Computing Science, The University, Glasgow G12 8QQ
>Phone: (041) 339 8855 x 6044 		Fax: (041) 330 4913
>E-mail: (JANet)      andrew@uk.ac.glasgow.dcs
>  	(INTERNET)   andrew@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk


Jimmy Higgs was one of the worst!


Raj.