From: sjk@astro.as.utexas.edu (Scot Kleinman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.reviews
Subject: REVIEW: Amiga 3000T-040
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Date: 21 Jan 1993 19:01:14 GMT
Organization: The Amiga Online Review Column - ed. Daniel Barrett
Distribution: world
Reply-To: sjk@astro.as.utexas.edu (Scot Kleinman)
NNTP-Posting-Host: karazm.math.uh.edu
Keywords: hardware, system, 3000T, 68040, tower, commercial


PRODUCT NAME

	Amiga A3000T-040


BRIEF DESCRIPTION

	Amiga A3000 in a tower case with pre-installed A3640 (68040) card.


AUTHOR/COMPANY INFORMATION

	Name:		Commodore Business Machines
	Address:	1200 Wilson Drive
			West Chester, PA  19380
			USA
			(Varies for other countries)

	Telephone:	(215) 431-9100


LIST PRICE

	The list price has recently been reduced to about $2700 (US).  I got
mine at a special price as a Commodore developer.


SPECIAL HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS

	The system came with a pre-installed A3640 card, 4MB of fast RAM and
1MB of chip RAM.  It came with a preformatted (with Workbench 2.0.5) Seagate
240MB drive and one high-density (HD) floppy.

	I added a second internal HD floppy drive, an A2286 Bridgeboard, an
A3070 tape drive and an A1960 monitor.  I also transferred my Quantum 105MB
drive and 14.4K Practical Peripherals modem from my A1000.  In addition, I
added 4MB of Fast RAM, another 1MB of Chip memory, and installed Workbench
2.1.


BACKGROUND READING

	Since the Amiga 3000T-040 is an A3000T with a 68040 card, I
recommend you read Dan Barrett's previous reviews of the A3000T.  They are
available in the c.s.a.reviews archives on math.uh.edu, and they have a lot
of relevant material which I will not repeat here.


WHY A3000T-040?

	My computing needs have recently outgrown my Amiga 1000, so I started
exploring upgrade paths.  My considerations were:  an A4000, the A3000T-040,
a '486 clone, and a SPARCClassic.  I ruled out the '486 since that would
require new software and learning a new architecture; and with the new
pricing on the Amigas, the savings would not be much.  The SPARCClassic was
next to leave the list.  While the new base machine is fairly inexpensive,
the cost of hardware necessary to utilize it fully plus maintenance and
repair proved too high.  That narrowed it to an A4000 or an accelerated
A3000. The only thing the A4000 offered that the A3000T-040 did not was the
new chip set and higher graphics speeds (see benchmarks, below.)  For the
price of not having the latest machine, the A3000T-040 offers more expansion
capability and a real SCSI port.  The only other option I considered was
waiting for the A4000T, but I really couldn't wait much longer, and I
imagine the A4000T will be priced significantly more than the reduced
A3000T-040.  So, I placed my order for the A3000T-040.


SETUP

	The A3000T-040's box contains a bag of parts labeled, "Open
Immediately."  Inside is a note that says to put the enclosed SCSI
terminator on the back SCSI port before turning on the machine.  It worries
me that one might easily overlook this little warning and have trouble later.

	Also included was a note telling me to install the 68040.library
immediately.  A 68040 support disk was included with a neat install script
that worked fine.

	After turning on the machine and making sure it all worked, I
proceeded to take it apart and install my expansion devices.  I used the
hints in Dan's review to take off the front and side panels.  (I recommend
reading that review, since the manual does leave a few things out.)  The
first thing that I noticed is that the motherboard does not have the 68030
and 68882 that other A3000s have.  The A3640 card is in the CPU slot and
held down by two screws.  This must be removed to install fast RAM.  I made
myself a groundstrap from a length of speaker wire and set to work.  One
must be careful, but the RAM installation is easily done.

	I then started to install the the second floppy drive.  Here I faced
two problems.  First, the screws needed to hold the mounting bracket to the
tower were not included in the bag of parts; and second, no instructions
were included with the drive.  So when I got the screws myself and installed
the drive, I could not get the machine to recognize both drives at the same
time.  I fixed the problem by changing a jumper on the new drive from the
DS0 position to the DS1 position.  Note that there is a jumper on the
motherboard marked DF1 and NO DF1, but it was recently posted to the net
that this jumper is not relevant to the HD drives.  Perhaps it is for the
standard drives -- I don't know.  Also missing from my bag were the screws
for the Tower's feet and for the 5.25" bridgeboard drive.  Commodore
eventually sent me the feet screws along with the "Quick Installation"
poster that I was missing.  I managed to assemble the system without it.  By
the way, you must take both side panels off to install the floppy drives.

	The bridgeboard and drive went in easily, though I still can't get
the floppy to work.  I suspect it is a bad drive, as I did get a borrowed
drive to function properly.  Sigh.  The biggest challenge, I thought, was
going to be the installation of my old Quantum drive from my A1000.  I was
not sure if I would be able to take the drive off my A1000 controller and
have it accessible on another.  It actually turned out quite easy, though.
I mounted it with the supplied "HD stacking brackets" over the internal
Seagate drive and used my old mountlist entries to mount my three separate
partitions.  To my surprise, they mounted the first time (after changing the
device name), and all my files were there.  I then tested the A3070 by
backing up the drives, and used HDToolBox to reformat them and the A3070
(via Quarterback 5.0.3) to restore them.  It all worked fine.

	The only real tricky installation process is the installation of the
hard drive shelf, as Dan mentions in his review.  His hints, however, were
quite helpful and sped up the process enormously.  I made the mistake,
though, of trying to figure it out myself before re-reading his hints.

	The installation of 2.1 over my existing 2.0.5 Workbench was
simple.  I just used the install script and it replaced everything it needed
to, got rid of anything obsolete, and left everything else alone (especially
SPEAK: and Say.)


ADDRESSING DAN'S CRITICISMS (from his review)

	The internal fan:  I don't find the fan noise intolerable at all.
It is audible, but not disturbingly so.  Either I have an improved fan or am
not as sensitive as Dan.  It is louder than my A1000's fan, but much quieter
than the hunk-of-PC on my desk at work.  The unit is standing on the floor
facing me at the end of my desk -- about two feet away.

	The speaker:  I have not really employed it much, so I can't comment
on it yet. 

	Locking up during crashes:  I have had only a few crashes and all of
them resolved with the three-finger salute.  I've been quite happy at the
fewer number of GURUs.  I've had the machine on almost continuously since I
got it.  No major problems there, either. I guess the real test will be this
summer when it is significantly hotter here in Texas.  The machine is
remarkably stable.  (And Mindwalker still works!)


SPEED AND BENCHMARKS

	Since one of my primary needs was a faster CPU, I set out to
benchmark the system.  My work entails a lot of floating-point intensive
operations.  I installed Manx C5.2a (they say version 5.3 will support
inline math functions that the 68040 needs) and my old version of Absoft
Fortran.  Both seemed to produce valid code -- though the Fortran compiler is
certainly not optimized for the new breed of Amiga CPUs.  I used these
compiler to run some of my standard codes and timed them compared to the
SPARC stations I use at work.  I would compare them to my A1000, but I have
disassembled it, and the thought of setting up the compilers on a
floppy-based system is no longer appealing.

	In the following benchmark reports, an asterisk ("*") denotes the
A3000T-040.  The tests were performed on a standard system.  I tried to run
all benchmarks with nothing else running on the system.  (It's possible
there were some Bridgeboard tasks running -- I am not familiar enough with
it to be sure.)

	I have not yet tried any of the '040 hacks which speed things up by
remapping Kickstart to RAM.  If the doc files I read are correct, a
substantial speed increase can be gained through some of these programs.  I
can post results later under some of these conditions if there is interest.
	
   DFT (Discrete Fourier Transform):

	I compiled my standard Discrete Fourier Transform program both with
	Aztec C and Absoft Fortran.  I compare the speed to a SPARC 2 and a
	SPARC SLC both without any additional (non-root) processes running)
	using the native compilers optimized for floating point operations.

	The program reads in a 932 line data file and a 3 line control file,
	performs a DFT on the data, then writes the results back to disk.
	The small test produced a 600 point DFT; the big test used the same
	data but made a DFT with 60000 points.  The Amiga C code was
	optimized by the compiler.  The 5.3 version of Manx C should speed
	things up a bit when it is released.  As I understand it, the 68040
	FPU does not have the transcendental math functions built-in that
	the 68881/2 does.  Instead, it generates traps to routines which
	emulate the functions.  These traps take time.  If, however, the
	compiler generates the emulated functions in the code itself, then
	the 68040 can execute these functions quicker than a similarly
	clocked 68881/2 can.  Since the Fourier transform uses these
	functions extensively, I expect the inline optimization to make a
	noticeable difference.  I think the Amiga FORTRAN timings say more
	about the compiler than the machine.
      
	System                       Small Timing (sec)  Big Timing (min:sec)
	------                       ------------------  --------------------
	* (C/Optimized -so)               54 / Not Run       Not Run
	* (above but read/write to RAM:)  47 / 46            76:48 / 76:45
	* (Fortran RAM:)                  113                224:50
	SPARC 2 (C/Optimized -O2)         12 / 10            17:49 / 16:02
	SPARC 2 (Fortran/Optimized -O2)   12 / 10            18:01 / 16:28
	SPARC SLC (Fortran/Optimized -O2) 34 / 32            55:26 / 52:02
	SPARC SLC (C/Optimized -O2)       35 / 33            55:13 / 53:04

   CPUSpeed:  

	Using the CPUSpeed program included with the operating system, I get
	the following numbers:  

		  Integer Math                        Floating Point Math
		  ------------                        -------------------
	A2000         217K                                N/A
	A3000         1728K                               616K
	*             3769K                               4822K

   SysInfo: 

	Using the Speed test on the main screen and the Speed test on the
	drives screen, I find:

	Dhrystones: 18093
	
	Speed Comparisons (how much faster the tested system is)
	-----------------
	A500 A600 STD        30.82	(e.g., 31 times faster than A500)
	B2000 Extra RAM      25.88
	B2000 GVP A3001      3.04
	A2500 A2620          8.80
	A3000 25MHz          3.90
	PP&S Mercury '040    0.90

	MIPS                 18.88
	MFLOPS               4.79

	Internal SCSI Drive Read Speed: 514K/sec.

   AIBB: (This is a NICE program -- thanks, LaMonte.) 

	I ran all tests with multitasking disabled and the Screen Overlay
	option turned on.  I chose the most optimized code options for each
	computer involved.  In summary, the A3000T-040 is about 10-20 times
	faster than a stock A500 for non floating-point (FP) stuff, and
	about 200 times faster for FP stuff.  It is consistently a few times
	faster than a stock 25MHz A3000 and equal to an A4000 for all but
	the graphics operations.  I understand that running AmigaDOS 3.0 on
	the system even without the AGA chipset can speed up some graphic
	operations by a factor of two or so.  Here is a summary of the AIBB
	log file:

	System CPU: 68040     System FPU: 68040      System MMU: 68040  
	CPU Clock Rate: 25.0 MHz      FPU Clock Rate: 25.0 MHz

	Test Name: EmuTest
	This Machine : 16.43
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.02  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 5.53  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 16.09  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: InstTest
	This Machine : 10.40 
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.01  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 5.90  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 10.08  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: Writepixel
	This Machine : 6.38
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.45  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 4.10  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 26.12  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: Sieve
	This Machine : 11.81
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.04  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 9.28  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 11.88  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: Dhrystone
	This Machine : 19.16
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.03  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 5.96  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 18.96  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: Sort
	This Machine : 19.91
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.03  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 7.13  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 19.67  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: Matrix
	This Machine : 16.14
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.02  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 10.14  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 16.22  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: IMath
	This Machine : 41.42
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.01  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 18.29  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 41.66  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: MemTest
	This Machine : 11.35
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.03  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 6.70  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 11.54  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: TGTest
	This Machine : 1.73
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.25  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 1.62  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 2.93  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: Savage
	This Machine : 229.91
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.01  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 207.15  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 247.66  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: FMath
	This Machine : 214.06
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.02  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 23.65  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 213.65  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: FMatrix
	This Machine : 19.54
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.02  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 7.14  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 19.33  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: BeachBall
	This Machine : 201.82
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 2.08  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 75.70  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 354.16  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: SWhetstone
	This Machine : 209.28
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.02  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 74.65  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 214.39  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: DWhetstone
	This Machine : 204.86
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.01  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 78.68  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 211.20  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: FTrace
	This Machine : 231.48
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.01  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 124.04  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 231.59  (68020 | 40 Math)

	Test Name: CplxTest
	This Machine : 29.39
	A500-NFR     : 1.00  (68000 | SC Math)  Base System
	A2000-FR     : 1.02  (68000 | SC Math)
	A3000-25     : 7.22  (68020 | CP Math)
	A4000-25     : 29.03  (68020 | 40 Math)

	
DOCUMENTATION
 
	The documentation is as Dan describes in his review.  The only 68040
specific item is the sheet of paper that comes with the 68040 support disk,
and it has an error.  It states that the included version of the 68040 does
not include an FPU, but it does.


LIKES AND DISLIKES

	I am very impressed with the speed of the machine and its
reliability.  I like AmigaDOS 2.1 a lot:  it's a big jump up from a
disk-based 1.3.  I am equally happy with all the peripherals.  The only
thing I miss from my A1000 (besides a horribly crowded desktop) is a place
to put a pen on the keyboard.  Resting a pen against the top row of function
keys is not quite the same.  I was a bit disappointed that I did not receive
the three-button mouse with the system.  Instead, I got the standard
"pregnant" two-button version.  It handles quite well, though.

	I like the design of the tower and am happy with the A1960 monitor,
though I had heard some bad reports about it.  I certainly would prefer a
larger 3rd party monitor; but without that kind of money, the A1960 seems to
be a good bet. 


CONCLUSIONS

	I am very happy with the speed of the system.  It is only a few times
slower than the SPARC that I could have afforded instead (without peripherals
of course.)  My only worry is that the machine will be treated as some sort
of hybrid and future support may be shaky.  But then, I owned a Commodore
CBM 2001 when everyone else was sporting Apples and TRS-80s, so I'm used to
it.  This machine should get as much support as any accelerated A3000 does,
and perhaps more since it is Commodore-accelerated.  I understand that
AmigaDOS 3.0 will run on non-AGA machines; so once RTG graphics come along,
this machine should be almost indistinguishable from an A4000.  The machine
really feels professional.  For someone looking for a good deal on speed and
who doesn't mind being slightly behind the current scene, I highly recommend
this machine.  I remain pleased with the machine and my productivity has
gone up enormously.  Processes that used to make me pour a glass of water,
read the newspaper and walk the dog before they finished are now done before
I can record in my logbook what I am doing.  Now, if I only I could make it
complete my logbook as well....

	I would be happy to respond to any questions or comments.  My E-mail
address is printed below.


COPYRIGHT NOTICE

	Copyright 1993 Scot Kleinman.  All rights reserved.  Permission is
granted to copy and distribute this review free of charge, provided it is
distributed unmodified and in its entirety.  It may not appear in any
commercial publication, in whole or in part, without the author's written
permission.
	
Scot Kleinman -- Astronomy Department, University of Texas at Austin,
Austin TX 78712. -- sjk@astro.as.utexas.edu sjk@emx.cc.utexas.edu

---

   Daniel Barrett, Moderator, comp.sys.amiga.reviews
   Send reviews to:	amiga-reviews-submissions@math.uh.edu
   Request information:	amiga-reviews-requests@math.uh.edu
   Moderator mail:	amiga-reviews@math.uh.edu