HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lb2e+@andrew.cmu.edu (Louis Blair)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Time travel in the Terminators
Date: 29 Jul 92 01:02:37 GMT
	<1992Jul28.220811.11671@sura.net>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Just for the record, here is what was said in the first movie:

D:
Why didn't the computers just kill Conner then?  Why this elaborate
scheme with the terminator?

R:
It had no choice.  Their defense grid was smashed.  We'd won.  Taking
out Conner then would make no difference.  Skynet had to wipe out his
entire existance.

D:
Is that when you captured the lab complex and found that.. What is it
called ... the time displacement equipment?

R:
That's right.  The terminator had already gone through.  Conner sent
me to intercept and they blew the whole place.

D:
Well, how are you supposed to get back?

R:
I can't .. nobody goes home.  Nobody else comes through.
It's just him, and me.

D:
Why didn't you bring any weapons, something more advanced?
Don't you have ray guns?  Show me a piece of future technology.

R:
You go naked, something about the field generated by a living
organism, nothing dead will go.

D:
Why?

R:
I didn't build the fucking thing!

D:
Okay, Okay.  But this cyborg.. if it's metal..

R:
.. SURROUNDED BY LIVING TISSUE.

D:
Oh, right, right.

D:
Why were the other two women killed?

R:
Most of the records were lost in the war.  Skynet knew almost
nothing about Connor's mother.  Her full name.. where she lived
They just knew the city.  The terminator was just being systematic.

D:
Uh-huh.  Well, lets go back to one other thing...

R:
LOOK. You have heard enough. I have answered your questions,
now I have to see Sarah Conner.

D:
I'm afraid that's not up to me.

R:
Why am I talking to you?

D:
Because I can help you.

R:
Who is in authority here?

D:
Please ...

R:
Shut up.  You still don't get it, do you. He'll find her.  That's what he
does.  That's all he does.  You can't stop him.  He'll wade through you,
reach down her throat, and pull her fucking heart out.  Let go of me..
From: rcbi27@muvms3.bitnet (DBRUM)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Dr. Strangelove (Ambassador taking pictures)
Date: 23 Jul 92 20:30:07 GMT
Organization: Marshall University

He's kneeling down, pulling up his pants leg to operate a small spy
camera that's strapped to his shin. Remember before when he and Turgidson
were "fighting in the war room" and Turgidson accuses the ambassador
of trying to take secret pictures with a camera hidden in a matchbox, and
the ambassador in turn accuses Turgidson of "This stupid fool was trying
to plant this rediculous fake camera on me!" which it seems Turgidson
was--and then the ambassador ends up taking pictures anyway!

"Here, Mr. Ambassador, try one of these Jamaican cigars; they're pretty good."
"No, thank you. I do not support the labor of capitalist stooges!"
"Oh...only Commie stooges, eh?"
-- 
	"Were his solid black square paintings really,
	as the artist claimed, simply neutral, abstract
	compositions devoid of external references and
	meanings?" ***********************************
From: prism.gatech.EDU!ccoprdj@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: TERMINATOR II
Date: 22 Jul 92 18:51:00 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In article <91581@bu.edu> antoniou@buitc.bu.edu (George Antoniou) writes:

>Watching this flick again...  
>In the end when the Liquid-Metal-Terminator (LMT), the Terminator,  the 
chip,
>and the arm were melted...  and they said all is destroyed....  SURPRISE!!!
>Remember when the LMT shoved the Terminator's left arm into the huge 
sprocket
>thing....  the Terminator had to ripe his arm off to break free...
>well... well...  guess what they forgot to melt...  the Terminators riped
>left arm...

True, but there really wasn't enough left of that arm to be any good.  At
least with the chip, they were able to see how it was designed, and it
turned them in the right direction.  With the arm, they really couldn't tell
anything, except maybe that it's made of an alloy that they haven't ever
seen before.

>So... T3 should be coming out soon...  hahaha...  You see the arm will still
>be in the present... meaning the 'same' future will still evolve (the 
nuclear
>holocaust)...  T3 should settle that problem... don't you think.....

Yes, they should settle that problem by destroying Skynet once and for
all and putting an end to the sequels.  T2 was to Terminator what Highlander
2 was to Highlander (and no, I don't just mean a sequel, I mean a *bad*
sequel).


-- 
Jorge Diaz                       | "You're outmanned, you're outgunned, 
you're
Georgia Institute of Technology  |      outequipped what else have you got?"
Office of Information Technology | "Guile."
ccoprdj@prism.gatech.edu         |      -- Riker and Worf   "Peak 
Performance"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: an883@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John Yan)
Subject: Re: Myths or Movies? (Batman 3)
Reply-To: an883@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John Yan)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 14:08:23 GMT


In a previous article, ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz) says:

>In article <BOV.92Jul21171020@essex.x.co.uk> bov@x.co.uk (Andy Bovingdon) writes:
>
>
>Well, I don't know about a black robin, but the third robin *was* a girl
>(can't remember her name, though).  Check out Frank Miller's "The Dark
>Knight Returns".  Great story.
>

Michael jackson as Robin? Think he would have the urge to grab his
crotch too much and moonwalk on the enemies..

Well Damon Wayne's brother Marlon was originally cast as Robin, I wouldn't
mind seeing him as it.

As for the female Robin.. Hey, Make the Miller classic "Dark Knight Returns"
into a movie.. Now that would make a great film..
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: vargish@sura.net (Nick Vargish)
Subject: Re: REVIEW: NAKED LUNCH
Organization: SURAnet, College Park, MD, USA, NA, Earth, Milky Way
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 00:34:38 GMT

med50003@nusunix2.nus.sg (WANSAICHEONG KHIN-LIN) writes:

>Naked Lunch - Movie by D Cronenberg et al

[... etc ...]

>I'd watch it again but I too would be wary about recommending it unless
>I knew what the other person liked. Be careful with this one.

You know, when it comes to tNL, I usually recommend it and let the
people sort themselves out afterwards. If they didn't like it, it
probably at least shook them up, and thus wasn't wasted.

>Gervais Wan

Did you see it in Singapore? (I noticed your e-address.) I wonder if it
was much... uh... "changed" from the version shown in the States.

Nick Vargish

p.s. I'll be in Singapore again this December, visiting family. Can't
wait!

-- 
|  Nick Vargish       | "I'm just another wide area network packet-herder..." |
|  SURAnet Operations +-------------------------------------------------------+
|  vargish@sura.net   | "SURAnet  and I do  not have a  relationship based on |
|  h: 301 474-1863    | mutually-shared ideologies.  Don't assume otherwise." |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble)
Subject: Re: Jim Cameron and Escape from New York
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 17:55:59 GMT
Organization: Sporadic and incomplete

jvs@lester.appstate.edu (John V. Scalco) writes:

> I have seen "Point Break" and I noticed that James Cameron or perhaps
> Jim , is credited with executive producer.  same Cameron? 

Same Cameron.  I'm pretty sure he and Kathryn Bigelow -- who directed
"Point Break", "Near Dark, et al. -- are married now.  (He used to be
married to Gale Ann Hurd.) 

--
Lazlo (lazlo@triton.unm.edu)

"SPAP OOP?  What the HELL kind of name for a snack food is SPAP OOP?"
 [turns box right-side-up]  "Ohhhhhhh..."  -- a TRUE and PATHETIC story
From: charlesk@fraser.sfu.ca (Charles Hak Kim)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Worst Movies 1992
Date: 24 Jul 92 03:16:10 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada

gharris@jade.tufts.edu (George W. Harris) writes:

>In article <charlesk.711255062@sfu.ca> charlesk@fraser.sfu.ca (Charles Hak Kim) writes:
>> {much enthusiastic bashing of ACES: Iron Eagle III deleted}
>>
>>I again warn you:  viewing this dreck can be harmful to your health.
>>
>>No Regard,
>>
>>Charles H. Kim

>	Come on, Charles, tell us how you *really* feel!

>gharris@jade.tufts.edu    

I must confess I really did kinda like it.  I feel this movie redefined
Hollywood Cinema in a way never before attempted, and hopefully for my
sanity, never attempted again.

No!  I hated it!  hatedhatedhatedhated...aaaarrrrghhhhuuuuhhh!!!!!

Regards,

Charles "Two-in-One" H. Kim

charlesk@sfu.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: uhschreg@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Ulrich Schreglmann)
Subject: Re: Audience Comments During Movies
Organization: Student Pool, CSD, University of Erlangen, Germany
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:17:42 GMT

nasadk@vccsouth17.its.rpi.edu (Kristopher Martin Nasadowski) writes:

>Of course, this comes from someone who sings along with the songs in a 
>Monty Python movie.

"Sit on my face and tell me that you love me..."
Oh boy!


May the Cool be with You!

(C)OOL mcmxcii
From: thomason@feldspar.egr.msu.edu (Faran Thomason)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Comfort of Strangers
Date: 25 Jul 92 23:37:52 GMT
Organization: College of Engineering, Michigan State University

In article <1992Jul23.065821.16203@augean.eleceng.adelaide.edu.AU>, dabbott@augean.eleceng.adelaide.edu.AU (Derek Abbott) writes:
|> In article <ataylor.711821083@uclagsm> ataylor@agsm.ucla.edu (Al Taylor) writes:
|> >dabbott@augean.eleceng.adelaide.edu.AU (Derek Abbott) writes:
|> >
|> >
|> >>Has anyone seen the movie "Comfort of Strangers" with screenplay by
|> >>Harold Pinter?
|> >
|> >>If you understood the movie, please explain. It was too cryptic for me.
|> >
|> >
|> >I saw the movie and understood that it sucked.
|> >
|> 
|> Yes it appeared like that to me too. However, as no less than Harold Pinter
|> wrote it, I thought that there must be some deep meaning in it somewhere
|> that I missed?
|> 
|> Anybody give me a clue?
I just thought it was one of those wired movies combining melodrama,camp and the bizzare
like a David Lynch film. I can't imagine that there is any high meaning than don't get
involved with wierd Europeans that you don't know,
From: gallua.gallaudet.ed!rlwilliams@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Favorite musicals
Date: 23 Jul 92 01:47:00 GMT
Organization: Gallaudet University
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

In article <1992Jul22.183435.21145@ll.mit.edu>, urbano@ll.mit.edu (John 
Urbano) writes:
> 
>  Two of my favorite musicals of all time are Yankee Doodle Dandee
>  and 1776.
> 
>  YDD is a classic, I just saw it yesterday for the first time in about
>  6 years.  Unfortunately they colorized it, and didn't do a very good 
>  job.  Thank god that colorization has no effect on the music.
> 
>  1776 does not seem to have a large following, but I don't understand
>  why.  
> 
>  Let's hear some opinions on these two great musical.
> 
>  John
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?   The Shadow...

I thought Yankee Doodle Dandy was terrific. I suppose it's too much to ask if
the music from that is available on CD...

rlwilliams
From: Mike_Quigley@mindlink.bc.ca (Mike Quigley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Sequel in the Works
Date: 21 Jul 92 14:10:29 GMT
Article-I.D.: mindlink.13605
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada

Now shooting: Jeffrey Dahmer and Marcia Strassman starring in "Honey, I Threw
Up The Kids"...

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're going to reply in E-mail, please don't quote my whole
message back to me -- I (usually) remember what I said!
Mike Quigley, Vancouver, B.C., Canada             Mike_Quigley@mindlink.bc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: wildman@athena.mit.edu (Timothy Worsley)
Subject: Re: HK Movies (Was: Diary of a Hitman)
Summary: YOU ARE SO WRONG
Reply-To: eprice@sql.sybase.com
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 13:37:41 GMT

In article <1992Jul27.043523.10314@iti.gov.sg> hcleong@iti.gov.sg
(Leong Heng Cheong) writes:

>In article <1992Jul27.012505.5166@athena.mit.edu> ep[rice@sql.sybase.com writes:
>>I just watched Diary of a Hitman.  This is the worst movie I have seen
>>in recent memory.
>[...]
>>I wouldn't normally post something like this (I mean, there are a lot
>>of movies I think are bad), but I had to make an exception.  I cannot
>>think of the last time I was this shocked and dumbfounded, by a movie.
>[...]
>>-666 on the -4 to 4 scale.
>
>[NB: I've never seen DIARY OF A HITMAN before -- I assume it is
>a Hong Kong movie based on the content of the previous posting...]

WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG.  It is *not* a Hong Kong movie.  It is an
American movie, pathetically imitating certain aspects of an
infinitely superior (HK) movie, as I said.

>John Woo, for example, is not that great a director in this part of the
>world.  A BETTER TOMORROW was a box-office hit, but his later films
>could not get out of the sterotype and received quite bad reviews.  His
>latest film, HARD-BOILED COP, was described as a non-sensical piece of
>violent formula trash in the papers.  It also didn't do well in the
>box-office.

Have you *seen* HARDBOILED??  I thought it was great.  Not as good as
THE KILLER, but certinaly an order of magnitude superior to *any*
American action film I've seen this summer.

Who do you consider the greatest directors in HK then?  I'm curious!

>And you thought the current crop of Hollywood sequels are bad... :-)

I still do.  Give me A BETTER TOMORROW 3 over LETHAL WEAPON 3 or ALIEN
3 *any* day.

Ed Price              (not Tim Worsely)
eprice@sql.sybase.com (not wildman@...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: eiscoop3@bmerh52.bnr.ca (Robert McAulay)
Subject: Re: Delicatessen
Reply-To: eiscoop3@bmerh52.UUCP (Robert McAulay)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Canada
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 18:45:15 GMT

I saw Delicatessen a few weeks ago, what a treat!  I think this is the best	(read: most enjoyable) movie I have ever seen.  None of the scenes seemed to
be out of focus in our theatre, maybe that was a local problem?

The best scene (IMO, of course) had to be where Louison was finding the 
squeaky spring under the bed.  The filming I thought was beautiful - 
the scenes were always so clear and interesting, kind of a Coen brothers
style of filming.  Have the two guys who directed Delicatessen (I can never
remember French names) done anything else?  Was it as good?  Also the
saw - cello duets were touching.  I could go on about how much I enjoyed this
movie for hours.

Mike.
From: glaurent@wombat.inria.fr (Guillaume Laurent)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Worst Movies (Beetle-Juice ?? I enjoyed it)
Keywords: Movies, Worst
Date: 30 Jul 92 12:18:12 GMT
Organization: Koala Project, Bull Research France

In article <1992Jul28.142707.7946@infonode.ingr.com>,
dianne@dianne.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Dianne Ferrans ) writes:
> In article <712295665@marlin.cs.duke.edu>, malhotra@duke.cs.duke.edu (Manish
> Malhotra) writes:
> |> In article <1992Jul15.032131.1590@ccsd.uts.EDU.AU> swalker@uts.EDU.AU (S
> Walker) writes:
> |> >  Hudson Hawk & BeetleJuice
> |> >should go down in the annals of worst movies ever made

> Hey, anyone notice that while MANY have jumped in to defend "Beetlejuice"
> (and rightly so) NOBODY has defended Hudson Hawk. (and rightly so) :-)

There you have it: I, and about a dozen people I know, liked both of these
films.
Granted, they're far from being masterpieces, but if you like total nonsense
(which I and my friends do), they're quite enjoyable.
From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: BOOMERANG
Date: 24 Jul 92 17:20:24 GMT
Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU
Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH


in article <1992Jul21.181527.1@lucy.claremont.edu> lmiller@lucy.claremont.edu writes:

>I am delighted that Eddie Murphy has decided to join the world of mature
>adults.  If you want the immature antics of Raw, then so be it.  It's a great
>thing for young men to see someone realizing his mistakes and bettering his
>life.  As a plubic figure, I think that Mr. Murphy has made a move in the right
>direction.  I think twice, now, when a guy tells me he's a Murphy fan.  I use
>to write him off.  :)

I think Eddie Murphy is one of the funniest comics around.  Some of his
material was offensive, a lot of it was childish (what do you want - he
_was_ real young), but a lot of his material (even the childish stuff)
was really funny.

I also though Beverlye Hills Cop was great.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with a "mature" Eddie Murphy,
but to criticise a young Edie Murphy for being immature is kind of
silly.
-- 
    Brice Dowaliby         |    I may speak fluently, but 
(bd%fluent@dartmouth.edu)  |    I don't speak for Fluent
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jefft@athena.mit.edu (Jeff Tang)
Subject: Re: Audience Comments During Movies
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
	<1992Jul29.234900.27674@athena.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 23:53:31 GMT


If you enjoy funny audience comments, then you'll love Mystery Science
Theater 3000.  Really hilarious comments on really bad movies.   On Comedy
Central, Friday night 12:30 am and  saturday 10 am and 7pm.
--
Jeff Tang
jefft@athena.mit.edu
From: oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D. Oliver III)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Audience Comments During Movies
Date: 30 Jul 92 23:15:23 GMT
	<1992Jul30.000713.28423@athena.mit.edu>
	<1992Jul30.151014.9526@fid.morgan.com>
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In article <1992Jul30.151014.9526@fid.morgan.com> maus@fid.morgan.com (Malcolm Austin) wrote:
>>In article <1992Jul29.112122.4996@avalon.nwc.navy.mil>
> <dejesus@archimedes.nwc.navy.mil (Francisco X DeJesus) writes:

> <<In "The Last Boy Scout", intro scene, right after the football player gets
> <<to the end zone and shoots himself, someone remarked: "So, does the
> <<touchdown count?"

> Clearly the penalty should be two yards downward.

`Course, if it happened in a hockey game, they wouldn't even have noticed.

--
____________________________
	Jim Oliver  
	oliver@athena.mit.edu /	joliver@hstbme.mit.edu
	oliver%mitwccf.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: d-yang@cs.columbia.edu (David Yang)
Subject: Re: PRELUDE TO A KISS
Organization: Columbia University Department of Computer Science
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 14:14:52 GMT

While Prelude to a Kiss was on Broadway, Frank Rich (a theater
critic for the NY Times) made the interesting comment that
the body switch could be seen as a metaphor for AIDS-- the idea
being how do you keep loving when your loved one's physical
appearance has been ravaged.  Given the writer and director's
previous interest in the issue (in Longtime Companion, at least),
this doesn't seem unreasonable.  In any case, the issue of
soul vs. external appearance seems to be what they're
interested in, which would explain why there isn't the concern
with each person getting used to his/her new body.
From: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: thanksgiving???
Date: 21 Jul 92 01:57:32 EST
Reply-To: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

RJR>input or information on this question. Have you guys seen these posters
RJR>in theater lobbies which show this scary generic evil quasi-skeleton
RJR>face and then it says (I think) "THANKSGIVING" or something like that?
RJR>Any idea what this movie is?

     If you haven't heard yet, these are posters for the upcoming movie
     "Bram Stoker's Dracula," directed by none other than Francis Ford
     Coppola.
---
  SLMR 2.1a  Get out of the waves!  Get out of the water!
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: oysteint@ifi.uio.no (\ystein Tvedten)
Subject: Re: TERMINATOR II
Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 23:29:17 GMT
Originator: oysteint@yrsa.ifi.uio.no


In article <1992Jul24.200448.78854@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JOSEPH ALOYSIUS MCVEIGH) writes:
> ccoprdj@prism.gatech.EDU (Jorge Diaz) writes:
> 
> >Well, for starters, they could have explained why oh why the T1000 was able
> >to go back in time in a machine that only allows living things to pass
> >through.
> [...]
> 
> In "The Terminator", when asked why he didn't bring a decent, 2029-vintage
> weapon to 1984 to fight the Terminator, Reese replied something to the effect
> that field distortion caused by transporting a living organism prevented him
> from bringing luggage (so to speak). No mention was made of anything other
> than the *combination* being verboten.
> 
> The implication was that completely nonliving cargo is transportable by itself. T
> There is also a reference to the fact that the complete envelopment of the
> metal by the Terminator's living tissue is OK. Plot conveniences? Sure; you
> gotta have *some*, right?
>                                                     - JAM
  The first Dark Horse Terminator series (I think) had a "cute" way of bypassing
this... The terminators took a human with them (a resistance fighter they had
captured before they left), and had sewn a laser-pistol into his gut (The guy
just needed to be alive for a couple of mins) and so got a 21th century gun
with them.

:)


Oystein
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com (The Man from Another Place)
Subject: Re: Video release of Greenway movies
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 06:00:10 GMT

In article <1992Jul23.141414.5031@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, tzung@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (tzung-i.lin) writes...

} Among Greenway's movies that are released on VHS/LD that I know of are:

}	Name					VHS	LD
}	-------------------------------------	------	------------------
}	Draughtsman's Contract			yes	no
}	Belly of an Architect			yes	yes
}	Drowning by Numbers			yes	yes (or planned)
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Definitely yes -- I have a copy.

}	The Cook, The Thief, His Wife Her Lover yes	yes

} [...] owners of the CTWL LD complains the LD has a bad transfer.

Not "bad" so much as "not great" (except for the definite flaw in the
mastering, in which one half-minute scene has the right audio, but the
video was from a different part of the movie!

} I rented Draughtsman's Contract expecting something near the impression
} I had after watching it in the theater many years ago, boy, was it a
} nightmare!!  The VHS was barely watchable, the color of that transfer
} is washed out, the focus is blury, not LBX ... A total disaster!! This
} horrible experience prevented me from renting Drowning by Numbers.

I wasn't going to get DROWNING BY NUMBERS on LD because it wasn't
letterboxed, but I finally gave in when I was able to get it on special
sale. While the framing looks a bit cramped, I was still able to
appreciate the many virtues of the film. I hadn't seen the film before,
so I can't compare, but after seeing CTWL and how much Greenaway composes
for the entire width of the frame, I've no doubt that many such elements
are missing from DBN as well. In any event, cropping aside, the disc
transfer of DBN is quite good.

-- 

	"She's my radiation baby.
	 She's my teenage fallout girl."

--- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC, "The Mill", Maynard, MA)

    boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies