HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: marino@dxcern.cern.ch (Massimo Marino)
Subject: Alekhine attack in French defense
Organization: CERN European Lab for Particle Physics
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:15:41 GMT

Hi, I've heard about the Alekhine attack on French defense but I did not
found any reference about it on my (rather scarce) collection of chess
books. Anyone in the net could help me enlightning me?

Thank you.

P.S. e-mail me if you judge the subject of no general relevance
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Massimo Marino     |internet:marino@dxcern.cern.ch| Alle Angaben ohne Gewahr   
CERN - PPE Division|bitnet:   marino@cernvm.bitnet| Sous toutes reserves 
1211 Geneve 23     |decnet:   vxcern::marino      | Tutti dati senza garanzia  
Switzerland        |FAX:      (41) (22) 785 - 0207| No certified information 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: zxmpe01@studserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (Eberhard Pasch)
Subject: Knightstalker II
Organization: Comp. Center (ZDV) U of Tuebingen, FRG
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 13:01:25 GMT

On Saturday  I've received Knightstalker II (or Fritz2 as it is called
in Germany) directly from ChessBase. It plaays better than the old
program; they are using hash-tables now, which improves especially 
the endgame. In a pawn ending I got a depth of 20(!) half moves in 
about three minutes (on a 486/50).
They claim that they are using all the moemory of your computer for
those hash tables, if you remove himem.sys, emm386.exe etc. So I did
this and started the program and it crashed! Next I tried an empty
config.sys and an empty autoexec.bat, but it crashed again. Has anyone
else experienced this problem????
I'll call ChessBase this week, but I'm not sure if they can help me ....

Eberhard
From: clong@remus.rutgers.edu (Chris Long)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: US Championship Round 7 GAMES
Date: 11 Dec 92 20:05:07 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <Bz2sx8.3Lw@world.std.com>, Elliott Winslow writes:

>    0-7   Shirazi

What is it with this guy?  Has he been playing all-night poker again?
-- 
Chris Long, 265 Old York Rd., Bridgewater, NJ  08807-2618

"S.B., with an I.Q. of 161, failed to complete his course of study,
running away instead with his professor's wife."
H. J. Eysenck, _Know Your Own I.Q._
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: mem@world.std.com (Jeff Lesser)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: Harvard Square Speed...
Date: 16 Dec 92 20:09:22 GMT
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA

ov@head-cfa.harvard.edu (Olaf Vancura) writes:

>In article <1giuegINNhc@agate.berkeley.edu> mytelka@codon1 (Daniel Mytelka;612 Barker;x2-5110) writes:
>>
>>That would be in 1983. I was visiting Boston, and played a game against a
>>master who played blitz against all comers in Harvard Square for $1 a game,
>>giving twice as much time to his opponent. I lost, but the next guy beat
>>him. Turned out to be Short, pretty much an unknown at the time who had
>>just won the British championship, and was in this country to play the
>>US champion.
>>
>>DSM

>As a matter of fact this master is still in Harvard Square today!  He
>still takes all comers at 10 mins. to 5 mins.  The ante is now $2 per game,
>you know inflation and all.  I can't remember his name, but he tells me he 
>is in the 2300's. I haven't seen him since the winter season, though...

>Olaf


I believe you speak of Murray Turnbull.  He has beaten me many more times
than I him, but last time I managed to go 3-0-0.  He got very angry when I
stood up to leave (we had agreed to play for $2 per game, winner takes it,
with no time odds), but relented.
 
Roy Eassa
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: palane@iastate.edu (Paul A. Lane)
Subject: Re: Fischer to play Ljubojevic
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:31:36 GMT

In <1992Dec16.130114.18567@husc3.harvard.edu> fry@zariski.harvard.edu (David Fry) writes:


>A Belgrade daily newspaper is reporting that Jezdimir Vasiljevic, the
>man who sponsored the Fischer-Spassky match and is now a candidate for
>president of Serbia, has agreed to sponsor a match between Fischer and
>Ljubomir Ljubojevic to be played next March.  The games will be split
>between Belgrade and either Linares or Madrid.

>David Fry                                  fry@math.harvard.edu

I can forsee a problem. The U.S. has no doubt revoked Fischer's U.S.
passport and I'm assuming one cannot travel on a Serboyugo passport.
How can he get to Madrid?
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: hwr@intercal.com (Hanon W. Russell)
Subject: British Chess Magazine, December
Organization: Chessnews list (chessnews-request@tssi.com)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 21:40:10 GMT


                      BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE
                          December 1992
                        Volume 112, No. 12

The year-end issue of the "British Chess Magazine" features 
"Interpolis - Mega-bucks Mickey Strikes Again!" as its cover 
story. Of course, we are speaking of GM Michael Adams' victory 
at Interpolis/Tilburg which netted him a cool $100,000 guilders 
($56,000).

The wrap-up of the Fischer-Spassky match is ably covered and 
followed by an intriguing annotated game by British GM John 
Nunn. He annotates in depth (5 pages!) his first encounter with 
Russian wunderkind Vladimir Kramnik which took place in the 1992 
Bundesliga. The game was a Sicilian Richter-Rauzer full of 
fireworks which ended in a draw.

IM Paul Motwani discusses the Capablanca variation (4 Qc2) of 
the Nimzo-Indian Defense in a short opening article featuring 
games from recent British events. He focuses on both 4...Nc6 and 
4...c5 and possible replies for Black, essentially concluding 
that depending on one's taste, both probably give Black very 
playable games.

The remainder of this good if unremarkable issue contains the 
normal departments and the annual index for 1992. It has been a 
transition year for this oldest continuously published English 
language chess magazine. We look forward to the directions it 
will take in 1993.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE, 9 Market Street, St. Leonards on Sea, 
    East Sussex, TN38 ODQ, Great Britain
    Editor: Bernard Cafferty
    Deputy Editor: Byron Jacobs
    Frequency of publication: Monthly
    Page size: 5.375"x8.25"
Regular departments:
    Editorial
    Letters
    Test Your Chess by FM John Littlewood
    Correspondence Chess by Reg Gillman & John Hawkes
    Quotes & Queries by Ken Whyld
    Problem World by John Beasley
    Studies by Timothy Whitworth
    Reviews and New Books in Brief
    News from Overseas
Subscription information (U.S. subscriptions):
    1 year, 12 issues, $43 surface mail, $46 air freight
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This review reflects the opinion of and is proprietary to Hanon 
W. Russell. Copyright 1992 Hanon W. Russell, All Rights Reserved


Newsgroups: rec.games.chess,news.answers
From: sharring@cs.tamu.edu (Steven L Harrington)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: Pardon Fischer?
Date: 17 Dec 1992 07:33:11 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University
NNTP-Posting-Host: sparc92.cs.tamu.edu

In article <1992Dec16.182332.2727@colorado.edu> perlman@qso.Colorado.EDU (Eric S. Perlman) writes:
>In article <1992Dec16.011130.26210@penet.fi> an1595@anon.penet.fi writes:
>>GM Fischer indicted!
>>Arrest warrant issued!!
>>
>>Should U.S. chessplayers
>>lobby outgoing President Bush
>>for an executive pardon???
>
>NO.  Absolutely not.  Bobby Fischer may be a great chessplayer, but he's
>a despicable person.  Let the system work.
>
>-- 

Yes, absolutely. Fischer may be a despicable person but he is not 
a criminal. Sure, he's a criminal by the govt's "definition" but that
is circular logic. Couldn't we better use that "slot" in prison for housing
someone that is an actual threat to society? I won't even get into
the question of whether the gov't _should_ have the right to tell
people where they can play chess. Sure he's a lunatic and he has
many offensive attitudes, but the guy doesn't belong in prison.
Let's keep a murderer in for oh, say 9 years, instead of 8...
And before anyone starts the "guilt by association" crap, if we
use that argument then we'd better start jailing most of the people
in office.



-steve harrington
-texas a&m university
-ics::cowboy
From: jadiel@altair.csustan.edu (Jose Juan DeLeon)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Test
Date: 19 Dec 92 07:04:16 GMT
Organization: CSU Stanislaus

Just a test...
From: 506-5054%wwiv@tweekco.uucp (Craig Jefferies #506 @5054)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: "Good luck." from Bush?
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 04:07:13 GMT

Didn't President Bush wish Bobby Fischer good luck before the
Fischer-Spassky II match?  I seem to recall reading something
to that effect.  Does anyone recall that?
From: uzun@crash.cts.com (Roger Uzun)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Amiga UChess.lha avail via ftp
Date: 16 Dec 92 10:27:14 GMT
Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA

I just uploaded a file to amiga.physik.unizh.ch and to hubcap.clemson.edu
called UChess.lha.  It is a powerful Chess program for the Amiga which
requires a 68020 or better microprocessor, 4M or more of FAST RAM,
and KS 2.04 or later.  Its preferred display is a 640x480x256 color
Productivity mode AGA screen, and has VERy nice AGA graphics.  It will
downscale the graphics to 640x400x16 colors on ECS machines, automatically.
The program is available via ftp at those 2 sites,
I put it in the /amiga/new area of physik and in the /pub/amiga/incoming/games
area of hubcap.clemson.edu.

Program requires 2.04 or later KS
requires 4M of FAST RAM (L version requires 10M)
requires 68020 or better microprocessor

Recommended:
KS 3.0 or later
AGA machine
68040 processor

The L version of the pgm plays somewhat stronger, but requires 10M of FAST RAM.

-Roger
--------------------------------------------------------------
bix: ruzun
NET: uzun@crash.cts.com
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: edd@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (ed.knowles)
Subject: Re: This has gone far enough! Stop avoiding the issues!
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 20:31:58 GMT
Summary: Let's keep avoiding the issues

In article <18451@mindlink.bc.ca>, Bruce_Harper@mindlink.bc.ca (Bruce Harper) writes:
> Rather than "avoiding the issues", let's avoid the argument.  Strong
> Grandmasters can disagree on their assessment of a position - which is a good
> thing for chess.  Trying to figure out how much Fischer has lost on the basis
> of one match is silly.

Awww... come on. What's wrong with some lively discussion with few flames
here and there. Sometimes this group is in danger of becoming a real
"nerd central".  Also, I don't see why trying to figure out how much Fischer
has lost on the basis of one match is silly. Besides, it's all we have to
work with. 

> 
> Trying to justify every move Fischer made on the one hand, or holding him to
> an impossibly high standard on the other, isn't getting anyone anywhere.  Nor
> is impugning Joel Benjamin's motives, even if you don't agree with his
> analysis.  Probably only Fischer could clear up some of the mystery, and
> since he doesn't care, why should we?
> 

Well, Fischer and his supporters have him up on this pedestal of Undefeated
World Champion and strongest player ever. I think that anyone who makes such
claims should expect to be held up to a very high standard. 

> Maybe Short and Timman will rescue us from all this.

Yes, they will. Should be a good match. Remember Timman wins 9-5. You
heard it here first.

                                                 -Ed Knowles, W.M.C.

Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: Peter_Stockhausen@mindlink.bc.ca (Peter Stockhausen)
Subject: Fischer/Spassky
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 06:09:34 GMT

CBC news just reported that the US government laid charges against Bobby
Fischer for violating the sanctions against Yugoslavia.
Peter
--

----------------------------------------------------------------
   Peter_Stockhausen@mindlink.bc.ca         Vancouver, Canada
----------------------------------------------------------------


Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: gls@windmill.ATT.COM (the Mysterious Stranger)
Subject: Re: 3... I in the King's Gambit
Organization: Jack of Clubs Precision Instruments Co.
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 04:04:03 GMT

In <1992Dec15.064430.27205@klaava.Helsinki.FI>, mkukkone@klaava writes:
> >> 
> >> 1.  e4 e5  2. f4 ef 3. Bc4.  
> >> 
> 4.Qe2 fxe4 5.Qh5+ g6 6.Qe5+ Qe7 7.Qxh8 Nf6 and now 8.b3! and 9.Ba3 gets the
> queen out of corner. The trouble with 4.Qf3 is that after 4.-Qh4+ 5.g3 (The
> point, right?) 5.-fxg3 6.hxg3 Qxe4+ 7.Qxe4 fxe4 8.Bxg8 Rxg8 9.Rxh7 d5 black
> is a solid pawn up.

If 5. g3 were the point, this line would be pointless!  No, I had in mind
4... Qh4+; 5. Kd1 and normal development with a possible struggle over f4.
I think that Black will have a hard time holding the pawn, and his Queen
may be harassed.  What do the books say about this line?

-:-
   POZZO:  He used to dance the farandole, the fling, the brawl, the jig,
	   the fandango and even the hornpipe.  He capered.  For joy.  Now
	   that's the best he can do.  Do you know what he calls it?
ESTRAGON:  The Scapegoat's Agony.
VLADIMIR:  The Hard Stool.
   POZZO:  The Net.  He thinks he's entangled in a net.

				--S. Beckett, _Waiting for Godot_
-- 
G. L. Sicherman
gls@windmill.att.COM
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: edd@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (ed.knowles)
Subject: Re: A warrant issued for Bobby Fischer's arrest.
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:01:37 GMT
Summary: Isn't Fischer an American?

In article <1992Dec16.231952.525@uoft02.utoledo.edu>, dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu writes:
> In article <DUBACH1.92Dec15181037@husc10.harvard.edu>, dubach1@husc10.harvard.edu (joev dubach) writes:
> > Just saw it on the news.  Now, to the question, "If the UN prohibited 
> > going to New York, would you ignore them?"  Answer: not if they could
> > get the U.S. to throw me in jail.
> > 
> > Joev
> > --
> 
> I love it, the US constitution does not extend beyond the U.S. borders to
> protect you, but the laws can reach into the Eastern Bloc areas to smite those
> who disobey the whims of the politically powerful.
> 
> "Your Honor, counsel for the Defense, Ladies and gentleman of the jury. The
> State today shall prove that the defendant, Boby Fischer, is guilty of playing
> chess in Yugoslavia!"
> 
> Sounds like the opening of a Monty Python skit.
> 
> DMC
> 
> 
> 

Well, DMC, it seems that we can agree on something. As much as I despise
Bobby Fischer, I love the constitution and the bill of rights. It's scary
to me that the state department of late (i.e., the last 12 years) has found
it convenient of late to violate any citizen's civil rights at it's convenience.


Suspending Fischer's passport and confiscating his winnings sounds like some-
thing the old Soviet Union would do. I don't see France persecuting Spassky.
Throwing him in jail for playing chess in a politically immoral country seems
absurdly extreme...

I really don't care what happens to Fischer, but I do care what happens to
the United States constitution. Fischer is an American Citizen. There is no
law against being an obnoxius fuck. It's certainly not unconstitutional.

                                                  -Ed Knowles

Xref: sparky rec.games.chess:11750 rec.puzzles:8052 comp.unix.shell:5110
From: palane@iastate.edu (Paul A. Lane)
Subject: Re: Fischer indicted...
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:04:44 GMT

In <1gne94INN6r6@parsifal.umkc.edu> chris@kasey.umkc.edu (Christopher Mitchell) writes:



>Well...it looks like the U.S. finally indicted Fischer on violating the trade
>ban with Yugoslavia.  I heard on the radio that the maximum sentence he could
>get would be 10 years in prison and/or a $250,000 fine.  Though I don't think
>prison is a place for a man like Bobby Fischer, I'd reckon he's got $250,000
>to spare.  :)

A conviction would also result in the confiscation of the $3.35 million
plus any royalties he earns from the match. I think he'll stay away from
the U.S. for awhile.

Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: hau4@ellis.uchicago.edu (sven  hauptfeld)
Subject: Re: Pardon Fischer?
Reply-To: hau4@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:09:43 GMT

In article <1gpafnINN8bb@tamsun.tamu.edu> sharring@cs.tamu.edu (Steven L Harrington) writes:
>
>                   Couldn't we better use that "slot" in prison for housing
>someone that is an actual threat to society?

By your logic, we should pardon WWII war criminals who are now 80+ years old
and definitely do not pose any actual threat to society.

	Sven

Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: pope@gold.kpc.com (John Pope)
Subject: Re: US Championship Round 3 GAME
Organization: /nfs/gold/u/home/pope/.organization
	<1gdvnoINN4i6@gaia.ucs.orst.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 20:32:55 GMT

(Benjamin Lin) writes:
   I have a question about the Dzindzi-Fed game in Round 3.
   Why was it drawn? After the last move Ne5!!? White seems to
   be winning in the center.  The most interesting continuation
   seems to be ...de; d6+ Kh7; fe Ra7; e6 intendiing e7
   If Black does not start off with ...de then how can Ng6 or Nc6
   be stopped?  If instead ...Nxe5 then fxe5 looks good for White.
   Any comments?

Taking the N does look very bad for black, so probably he would have
let the N into c6 (which isn't always so bad as it looks).  For
example, 20.Ne5 Kh7 21.Nc6 Qc7 (21...Qe8? 22.Ba3 Rf6 23.Rfe1 is worse)
22.Ba3 Re8 23.Qb4 Bf8 24.Rfe1 Bb7 and black, while cramped, seems to
be surviving.

--
John Pope
pope@kpc.com
Kubota Pacific Computers, Inc.
(408) 987-3362
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: tim@socrates.umd.edu (Tim Perez)
Subject: Fischer makes front page.
Organization: University of Maryland University College
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:56:58 GMT


   Bobby Fischer's trouble with the government (USA) made the front page
   of the December 16, 1992 Wahsington Post. I'll post the article
   later.
Organization: Johannes Kepler University Linz - Computing Center
Date: Friday, 18 Dec 1992 09:59:51 CET
From: <K3006E7@ALIJKU11.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: Fischer time controls on ICS

No, I think it is true, you have to call flag now, on the ICS.
I was surprised in one game against Desomodus where his time
got to zero, and nothing happened.  I was up on material and
the game was rather interesting for me, so continued playing a
couple more moves, then realized he can mate me.  Being a chicken,
I then called flag, maybe about 30-50 seconds after he had
no more time left.

oops
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
From: alacron!ai386u!adb@uunet.UU.NET (Alan David Brunelle)
Subject: Re: Alekhine variation(s) in the French Defense
Organization: Chessnews list (chessnews-request@tssi.com)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 16:07:49 GMT



In response to a question about the Alekhine "variation" of the French:

There are two different variations named for/after Alekhine that I am aware 
of:

The Albin-Chatard-Alekhine Attack in the Classical line:

	1. e4 e6; 2. d4 d5; 3. Nc3 Nf6; 4. Bg5 Be7; 5. e5 Nfd7; 6. h4!?

	The idea being: 

		6. ... Bxg5; 7. hxg5 Qxg5; 8. Nh3

	with a development and space advantage. (I may be wrong on 8. Nh3, 
	but I believe that it is the correct move, leaving the d1-h5
	diagnol free.)

The Alekine Variation of the Winawer line:

	1. e4 e6; 2. d4 d5; 3. Nc3 Bb4; 4. Ne2!?

	And now:

		4. ... dxe4; 5. a3

		and if:
			
			5. ... Bxc3; 6. Nxc3 with f2f3, after 6. ... f5
			5. ... Ba5; 6. b4 & Nxe4
			5. ... Be7; 6. Nxe4

Hope this helps some!

			Alan D. Brunelle

---
Alan D. Brunelle, M.Sc.
Principal Software Engineer
ALACRON, Inc.
71 Spitbrook Road, Suite 204
Nashua, NH 03060
Phone: (603) 891-2750		FAX: (603) 891-2745

adb@alacron.com
From: Teri A Meyers <tasst2+@pitt.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: E-mail etiquette
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 04:36:41 GMT
Organization: Chessnews list (chessnews-request@tssi.com)
NNTP-Posting-Host: helios.unl.edu


For those of you who play postal or E-mail chess, I have a question on 
etiquette for you.  Earlier this year I was involved in a 4-way playoff
to decide the winner of USA Today's (aka "the LINC") yearly E-mail ladder
competition for 1991.  As a national competition, winning the tournament
is more a matter of prestige than anything else, although it does carry
a $100 award which can only be used to pay for online time charges on that
network.  In a key game between Alex Dunne and myself, I made a very 
obvious typo.  I had a rook on g8, which I intended to exchange for his
rook on d8.  Unfortunately, instead of playing g8d8, I entered g8e8 on
my computer, hit return, and instantly discovered to my horror that instead
of exchanging rooks, I had moved it to an unprotected square one square
short of the intended destination.  The TD, who I contacted immediately, 
said it was up to my opponent to decide whether to allow me to correct my
typo or not.  Alex refused to let me correct my move, and gives his reasons
in his column in this month's Chess Life (Jan 93, p32) - basically stating
that asking for a move back is like picking a pocket.  He also asks for
input from his readers, but since he only presents what I consider to be
one side of the story, I wanted to raise the issue here.  My argument is
that a typo can be likened to the situation in OTB chess where a piece
falls out of one's hand in mid-air and happens to land on a legal square.
It is not really a "move"; it is an accident, similar to brushing against
a piece with one's elbow in a "touch-move" game.  If there is no 'intention',
than a 'move', in the proper sense has not been made, even though a piece
may appear on a legal square.  So I don't feel I was even asking for a
move back--I was simply asking to correct the accident and make my move.
At present the game is over, so I am simply asking for opinions.  Alex
took my rook and I choose not to continue.  He will win the championship
by 1 point (whereas I would have won by 1 point if we had finished the
g me and I won, although neither of us knew for sure that the game would
be that pivotal at the time).  Lest anyone doubt that the move was indeed
a typo, I present the game score below, so you can judge its obvious
absurdity for yourselves.

Jerry Meyers (BG2) 2498 - Alex Dunne (PK4) 2352  1991 LINC Playoff
1. g3, d5 2.Nf3, Nf6 3.Bg2, Bg4 4.c4, c6 5.cd, cd 6.Ne5, Bf5 7.Nc3, Nbd7
8.Qa4, e6 9.g4, Bg6 10.h4, Bd6 11.N:d7, Q:d7 12.Q:d7, K:d7 13.h5, Bc2
14.g5, Ne4 15.B:e4, B:e4 16.Rh4, Bf5 17.d3, Rhc8 18.Bd2, Ke7 19.e4, de
20.de, Rc4 21.Ke2, Be5 22.f3, h6 23.Rg1, Rac8 24.gh, gh 25.B:h6, Bh7
26.Bf4, Bh8 27.Rhg4, b5 28.Bg5+, Ke8 29.N:b5, Rc2+ 30.Kd1, R2c6 31.b3, a6
32.Na3, Rd6+ 33.Bd2, Bc3 34.R1g2, f5 35.ef, B:f5 36.Nc4, Rdd8 37.Rg8+, Ke7
38.R:d8--intended, but entered as h8e8, K:e8 39.Forfeit

I would appreciate any comments either directly, or via E-mail.  Thanks,
Jerry Meyers  (Tasst2@pitt.edu)
From: mginsbur@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU (Mark Ginsburg)
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: Short-Timman
Date: 11 Dec 92 18:35:59 GMT
Organization: NYU Stern School of Business

Definitely maybe Timman, based on all previous games.

Timman 55%.

-aries