HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Where Karsten Likes To Do It
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 04:48:32 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star) writes:

> Subject: Re: The world's best places to make love

> 1.  In a weight room on a bench (after a workout)
> 2.  On a tennis court (on a hot day)
> 3.  In a sauna, while sipping Long Island Ice Teas
> 4.  On a running washing machine (spin cycle, hot/warm wash)
> 5.  On a cold, hard floor (like marble)
> 6.  On a Super-size bed, surrounded with lots of stuffed animals
> 7.  In a gun closet/armory
> 8.  A locker room
  9.  A Tanning bed.  (the lighting is really cool!)



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
From: smayo@wang.com (Scott Mayo)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Surprise your neighbors and friends
Date: 16 Apr 92 15:49:50 GMT
Organization: Wang Labs, Lowell MA, USA

... become a Christian.
--
These are only my opinions.  You should hear my convictions.
smayo@wang.com
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7160 alt.politics.homosexuality:2413 alt.sex:15023
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 17 Apr 92 11:35:22 GMT
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

jcc@frog.UUCP (Jim Chagnon) writes:

>  And any word that LEGITIMIZES the CONCEPT has to be PROPOGANDA!
> 
> jcc
> 

I am glad that we have found a common meeting point and that you
agree with me.

That is good.

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
From: dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: pissing after the deed
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 12:23:36 GMT
Reply-To: munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac
FollowUp-To: alt.flame
Keywords: 
Organization: More like Dis~, really.

In article <1992Apr12.184253.16897@mercury.unt.edu>, christopher williams writes:

> In <17817@awdprime.UUCP> greg@ngo.austin.ibm.com writes:
> >*******************************************************************
> >***************** greg@inetnode.austin.ibm.com ********************
> >*******************************************************************
> >    BEVO               **                                        **
> >  (__  __)     *       **     Just curious about                 **
> >    (oo)______/        **                                        **
> >     \/ (_____@ a      **     everything?                        **
> >        /     \   &    **                                        **
> >       /      /    m   **                                        **
> >*******************************************************************
> >*******************************************************************
> 
> ONLY someone from IBM would name a computer 'inetnode'. 
> And ONLY someone from IBM would have a .sig THIS UGLY.

I guess it's marginally better than calling their computer
'IEFBR14'

Dac
--
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6238 alt.politics.homosexuality:1746
From: dfpedro@nv2.uswnvg.com (Donn F. Pedro)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 6 Apr 92 17:00:30 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: US West NewVector, Bellevue, WA

In article <9am9HB4w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM vomits:
>
:Give me a break. <puke>

Apt description of your postings.

>--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
>--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------

You're the janitor, right?

>--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
>-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------




     Donn Pedro ...................{uunet, sequent, pn400}!uswnvg!dfpedro.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6826 alt.fan.q:418
From: krobinsn@mirkwood.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.q
Subject: Re: Kevin's "Business" Practices
Date: 15 Apr 92 03:11:34 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <22980@goofy.Apple.COM> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>In article <0u6Hp*&e6@cs.psu.edu>, krobinsn@carn-dum.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J
>Robinson) writes:
>> 
>> Can we say MISINFORMED, boys and girls?
>
>The evidence would strongly suggest that that's all you _can_ say.

Can we say IDIOT-AT-LARGE, boys and girls?

K e n   R o b i n s o n
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: `k e v i n' crumbles
Date: 6 Apr 92 20:35:13 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <1992Mar28.204124.23029@rotag.mi.org>, kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin
Darcy) writes:
> 
> In article <3138@daily-planet.concordia.ca> gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca
(Gene Ward Smith) writes:
> >In article <1992Mar26.112120.10304@husc3.harvard.edu>
zeleny@zariski.harvard.edu (Mikhail Zeleny) writes:
> >>In article <3120@daily-planet.concordia.ca> 
> >>gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca (Gene Ward Smith) writes:
> >
> >>GWS:
> >>>What argument? Homosexual behavior is *prima faciae* good for
> >>>homosexual people.
> >
> >>Being good for X is hardly a sufficient condition for being right for X.
> >
> >It is *prima faciae* enough, which is my point. You need an argument
> >in the other direction here.
> 
> Eee-ooooh! You're making my non-existent (right, Q?) legal credentials 
> _cringe_ with that persistent misspelling, Gene. Try "prima facie". That's a 
> good boy.

Then, in article <1992Mar28.175644.22036@rotag.mi.org>, kevin@rotag.mi.org
(Kevin Darcy) writes:
> 
> In article <29083@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> keegan@oboe.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan
Jr) writes:
> >
> >non sequitor. 
> 
> Mispelled...

Ah, I see you're back to spelling flames again, Kevin.  And, by the way, those
were _terribly_ impressive ones.  It's nice to see that you haven't lost your
grasp of the limits of your capabilities.

I'm sure folks will think twice before taking on a man who can spell "prima
facie" _and_ "non sequitur".  Not to _mention_ "servitus tigni immitendi"! 
Whether you can use them in a sentence or not.

Let's see, you've been clearly shown to be a complete incompetent as far as
legal issues are concerned; you've taken your lumps for your hypocrisy in
assailing others for name flames when you have no hesitation about using them
yourself; you've demonstrated that you _still_ don't know jack shit about the
Internet; about the only depth you haven't plumbed is Nazi flames.

I suppose we'll be seeing some of those real soon from your direction.

I can't help but wonder sometimes what it must be like to be someone whose very
name is, on a world-wide basis, synonymous with hypocrisy, silliness,
completely wrong-headed stubborness in the face of all evidence, empty and idle
threats, arrogance, and an appalling willingness to be made a fool of on a
fifteen-times-daily basis.

Doesn't seem like much fun to me, but, then, I have a _real_ life.

> P.S. I see you're back to your lame "Followup-to: alt.f1ame" tactics. I 
>      guess this means you're desperate, huh???

Clearly, somebody here is resorting to lame and desperate tactics.  On
close inspection, Kevin, it would appear to be you.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Adam and Steve in the Garden of Eden
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 92 20:04:11 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

krobinsn@eregion.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:

> And speaking of wasted bandwidth, maybe not posting as much as you

You post more than ANYONE...  Mr Kettle...



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6577 alt.politics.homosexuality:2008
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 19:44:30 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner) writes:

> A response in the style of Limpsack Headache: 'like your face?'
> 
> cws
> 


As I've already said.. Go fix your lipstick sweetie.. It's all
mussed looking.

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: His friend and nobody else's, Kevin Darcy!
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 04:18:53 GMT


kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> In article <H._HOgYbJumtI@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
-> >In <1992Apr2.034331.9050@rotag.mi.org>, Kevin Darcy writes:
-> >>In article <H.CpiVtJon3Yc@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca> jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
-> >>>In <1992Mar29.055700.26223@rotag.mi.org>, Kevin Darcy writes:
-> >
-> >>"Have you apogized for the thread you inflicted on news.admin which 
-> >>                       ^^^
-> >> generated mostly replies like the following.
-> >>

-> >>"In article <rdippold.701121829@cancun>, rdippold@cancun (Ron Dippold) writes:
-> >> Both. Of. You. Get. Lost."
-> >>			Date: 28 Mar 92 20:13:18 GMT
-> >>			Message-ID: <H.9AEvj9C8frU@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca>
-> >>
-> >>I note your use of the definite article "the" indicating
-> >>that ONE AND ONLY ONE THREAD was being discussed.
-> >>
-> >    Now Kevin, if you're trying to claim that thread's don't
-> >mutate and change Subject: lines, you must be reading a
-> >different net than I am.
-> 
-> (Mutation, piffle. The only mutant around here is YOU.) 
-> 
-> Support your claim or retract it, please. 

like you always do, eh kebbie? john is correct in his reasoning.
what are you trying to do anyway: claim that threads don't mutate
and change subject lines? please.

-- 
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: elf@polari.com
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Organization: Seattle Online Public Access Unix
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:37:19 GMT

In article <L60ViB2w164w@Bogus.COM>
     punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:

>Look, I said, that I don't agree with pornographic matieral in reach of
>children.  And that includes tv.  The day time soaps that you talk about are
>on when the kids are in school anyhow.

   Excuses, excuses.  I know of at least one fourteen-year-old girl who
watches more soap opera than her parents could ever dream of doing.
Know why?  She's the only person in the house who can program the VCR.

>I fucking didn't say anything against faggots in that post.  Now, I am really
>starting to get a strong dislike for faggots based on what you people are
>showing me.

   Nonsense, Jack... you came storming into here, and chose to stay, to
argue vociferously your point that you didn't want pictures of two men
doing ANYTHING remotely sexual portrayed anywhere.

>Why in the HELL do you people exaggerate so?  Sheesh, tv is too sexually
>oriented.  But the fact is, sex sells, and the advertisers are not likely
>to change that.  Take that up with them.

   True, and controversy sells as well; a picture of two men kissing
is, sadly, very eye-catching nowadays.  Sadly because it should be
about as boring a magazine cover as a nondescript heterosexual couple
kissing.

   At least one beer company has a very romantic male-male commercial
to sell to their San Francisco audience.

>You are so against heterosexual sex on tv, but don't care about your
>type of sex.

   I'm not against heterosexual sex at all, Jack!  On TV or anywhere
else, so long as it doesn't impinge upon how I'd like to live my life.

>> When you (I use "you" in the general sense) keep your fucking
>> bedroom off my TV, I'll do the same.  Hypocrite.
>
>See what I mean?  You are the hypocrite buddy.

   No, Jack... he's asking for equality, not hypocracy.  You're the one
arguing that your position is better than ours.

>Oh I do, and it is too much.  But, the thing that we can do is work
>with our kids about it.  Which is much more than alot of people are
>willing to do.

   So why don't you work with your kids on the picture of two men
kissing?  Or is "be loving to your fellow man" a concept so alien to
you you'd rather not have it introduced into your kids' brains?

>Its good to slow things down, or are you not for that?

   I _am_ for it, Jack.  I'm also for a sensible and rational handling
of the 10% of the population that, for whatever reason, finds itself
homosexual.

         Elf !!!
--
Civilization has branded you.  You will never be free unless you view
everyone and everything as suspect.  Food.  Drink.  Speech.  All
society's tools.  Everyone lined up and accounted for.  In formation.
                                          -- Number Six, The Prisoner
Elf Sternberg    elf%polari@uunet.uu.net  <-- checked twice daily.
elf@halcyon.com  elf@seanews.uucp  elf@pismo.uucp
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6974 alt.politics.homosexuality:2262 alt.sex:14852
From: twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 16 Apr 92 18:46:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: amhux2.1992Apr16.184601.15261
Organization: Amherst College, Amherst, MA

In article <DaDaJB1w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

>twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
>
>> Your point, rather, was that "homophobia" is a concept that is not
>> recognized by anyone other than the gay community.  In reality, it is.
>
>Not that it has any real meaning to anyone else.

False.  "djk" != "everyone else".

>> I find it fascinating how hot under the collar people get when they're
>> called "homophobic."  Tell me, would it really bother you so much if
>> you didn't think there was some substance to the claims?
>
>Tim, that reminds me of certain arguments used by mommies to
>manipulate kids into compliance. ;) It is not so much the word
>that bothers me - it is the way it is being used to squelch
>those opposed to certain facets of 'gay rights'.

You're evading the question, as usual.

(a) Please enlighten me as to how people are being "squelched."  Tell
me how people are being put in prison, tortured by the Secret Police,
or intimidated into staying off the streets at night by the use of the
word "homophobic."

(b) Would it really bother you to be called "homophobic" if you didn't
think there was something bad about homophobia?

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / "Someone here suggested blue square badges for
\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  straights.  Maybe we should try mauve
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /  heptagons?" - Damian Cugley, on soc.bi
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6242 alt.postmodern:1157
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.postmodern
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: La, la, la...
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 92 20:01:03 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

kibo@world.std.com (James 'Kibo' Parry) writes:

> In article <46aNiB3w164w@Bogus.COM> punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
> [...]
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  GEE, I'M SURE GLAD THAT .SIGNATURE VIRUSES ARE
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They will just mutate to get around it!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Evolution is god!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sanitation is fraud:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sandinistas ate Maude.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Santa Claus baits God.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Satan Claws Bates Dog!  Film At Eleven!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Satin draws mates bod.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I sat in Ward's tame knob.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I set a weird time bomb.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I shed a weird tie, Bob...
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I shot a wet teen babe.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Izod's a wasp trend, Biff.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I drove off a west end cliff
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>I rode to arrest a lift.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Electrodes tie my wrists.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>Elephants dive off rats.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>Eggplants live on mats.
> >> >>>>>>>>>Evolution is cats!
> >> >>>>>>>>Beetle lotion in vats
> >> >>>>>>>Feeble notions of autocrats.
> >> >>>>>>Foss'll know jejunoileal bypass.
> >> >>>>>Fossils found in cat's smashed ass.
> >> >>>>>Take care.
> >> >>>>>It's a bear!
> >> >>>I don't care.
> >> >>Oh contraire.
> >> >Lascivious medieval faires.
> >> ME TOO!
> >Okay This is a news pyramid right?  Do I win when I get to the top?
> You ruined it for EVERYONE!
And how's that?

===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6755 alt.politics.homosexuality:2106
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: 13 Apr 92 23:00:27 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <mw9TiB3w164w@Bogus.COM>, punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) writes:
> 
> There ARE pornography laws you know.  The newspaper is readily available to
> children.  I personally will not have my children exposed to this against my
> will.

Well, hell, you can't be _that_ picky.

You're exposing them to _you_.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: 6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Fags vs. Bisexuals
Date: 16 Apr 92 03:09:23 GMT

In article <1992Apr12.233515.833@gacvx2.gac.edu> karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) gets peeved and needs a life [oh Krobby, where are you?]:

>Correction, you don't think, Chrisstick, you randomly blather.
>You don't even know what a conversation is, and I base this
>conclusion on the fact that you can't understand simple English.
 
Again, Cheesy Breadstick compares me to an institute.  And he's 
getting just about as repetitious as ol' Kennywinkle.  Inglese
si trova facile, ma il latino excessit, e' vero.

>> See me previous post about stupid heterosexuals who believe all those
>> who advocate civil rights for everybody, including gays, must be gay.

>I think homosexual acts are disgusting.  Never have I argued that 
>homosexuals be deprived of the same rights I have.

Some might judge you by the company you keep.  Personally, I could care
less.  But how do you feel about gay marriage?

>But that's just
>like you to make wanton assumptions, something you have criticized
>me for. 

Wanton assumptions?  In alt.flame?  Consult The Meat Beast for a
comment to insert here.  My assumptions are *chaste*, and are
not available, Mr. Headpiece.

>Why don't you practice what you preach, Mr. Skinner?

What, not hating people for who they sleep with?  Not asserting
my 'normality'?  Given that you are 'normal', and don't practice
oral sex, what are your views on the sodomy laws, oh great
Saltlick?

>> Now, sucking weenie =! intelligence booster, but in Saltlick's case,
>> one must start somewhere, I suppose.

>Well, I'll kindly leave that to others.  You could bolster my 
>opinion of your intelligence by not making so many weak and
>unsupported arguments.  
 
Do you really think that your assessment of my intelligence worries
me?  Stale Breadstick thinks he's *normal*, and those who don't
mesure up are *disgusting*.  That doesn't imply a high degree
of intelligence.  Sounds more like opinion, fear, or blind faith.

>You usually stumble over the obvious because you have your head up
>your ass and nothing but shit enters your cranium.  Shit in, shit out.

Weak and unsupported argument, Lowcal.

>> I actually don't
>> wear plastic at all. . . 

>Probably because you don't  think you'd like to wear platic.  I don't 
>have homosexual sex because I don't think I'd like it.

Plastic, like you, is tacky.  If you don't *think* you'd like it,
stop criticizing others for indulging in it.  Am I criticizing
people who wear plastic?

>Karsten Hendrick, Breadstick of Champignons

cws
From: 6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts TO Justify "Queer Nation"
Date: 8 Apr 92 18:34:14 GMT

In article <65NwiB6w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM (I am 
not a bigot) writes:

>6500cws@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu (Christopher Wade Skinner) writes:

>> How do your co workers feel about your bigotry?
>> 
>> cws
>> 

>Probably the same way yours feel about having to listen to
>you blame others knowledge of your 'sexual orientation' to
>bigotry. ;)

Ah, the true stupidity of clueless het.boys who think all those
men who call them for being predjudiced about homsexuality must
be gay themselves.  Let me let you in on a little secret - 
I'm not gay, just not a bigot.  And lose the fucking smiley,
hypocrite.  Go tell the secrataries the one about the "fags",
buddy.

cws

>-djk

>--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
>--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
>--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
>-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6306 talk.abortion:14072
From: keegan@windsurf.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: giving kebbie a chance to tell the truth (was Re: Giving Jimmy a Chance for Redemption (was Re: The Kevster Wishes More Legal Advice))
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:50:30 GMT
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> keegan@rosebud.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
-> >sea-wolf@deathstar.com (Sea Wolf) writes:
-> >>Hint: Q is a habitual liar.  
-> >
-> >i've seen no evidence of this. and you've offered none.
-> >darcy, on the other hand, shown himself to be a liar quite
-> >frequently.
-> 
-> Remember what you said:
-> 
-> "btw, i did not support my statement [...] in this post. why don't you 
->  ask that i do so. i'll be pleased to comply with that request. anyone 
->  who wouldn't is a liar, or coward, or both. don't you agree?"
-> 						<9crrdha@rpi.edu>
-> 
-> I'm asking that you support your statement that I have "shown [myself] to
-> be a liar". Are you a "liar, or coward, or both", Jimmy???

sure.

i'm happy to comply. you lied about me. the following post,
calling you on your lie has been reposted several times. you have
yet to withdraw your claim and apologize. you lied.

=============begin included post
From keegan@ukulele (James G Keegan Jr) Wed Feb 26 12:46:32 1992
From: keegan@ukulele.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame
Subject: a darcy lie
Summary: another kevin darcy lie
Keywords: darcy, lie
Date: 26 Feb 92 16:27:01 GMT
Reply-To: keegan@ukulele.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.

kevin@cfctech (Kevin Darcy) writes:
-> Is this the same James Keegan who donned his net.cop badge and
-> uniform, and told me to get "my" [sic] child-support threads
-> out of t.a this past December??

i deny that i told you to get your "child-support threads out of
t.a. this past December."

please support your charge that i did so.

        "I provide all of the necessary evidence for every claim
        I make, or retract it."
			Kevin Darcy
			<1992Feb11.054339.25284@rotag.mi.org>

put up or shut up lad.

----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
======end included post
--
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.