HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rick@crick.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Richard H. Miller)
Newsgroups: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
Date: 29 Jul 1992 15:35:02 GMT
Followup-To: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups

Actually, since most models are by definition 'scale', I would proposed instead
to filll the hole in the rec.models hierarchy and go ahead and propose 

	rec.models.misc 

This is the one group missing [since rec.models is not a group] and will 
provide a place for threads which do not relate to the specific groups which 
now exist. I think this is the only hierarchy in which specific groups exist
without a place for misc. threads.


-- 
Richard H. Miller                 Email: rick@bcm.tmc.edu
Asst. Dir. for Technical Support  Voice: (713)798-3532
Baylor College of Medicine        US Mail: One Baylor Plaza, 302H
                                           Houston, Texas 77030
From: techsy005@spacm1.spac.spc.com (Fred Franceschi)
Newsgroups: alt.models
Subject: Re: filling in gaps
Date: 22 Jul 92 09:30:14 PDT
Organization: Security Pacific Automation Co., LA, CA

About 20 years ago I purchased the predecessor to  "Green Stuff".
It was a tube of light green automotive body putty,  I think made
by 3M.

What was left in the tube started to dry up several years ago and
I squeezed it into a small GLASS hobby paint jar. I thinned it to
the consistency I want with synthetic lacquer thinner;   whenever
it gets too thick, I just add a few more drops of the thinner. 20
years of use for a tube of filler that I am still using is a good
consumption rate and product longevity. 8^)
-- 

Fred Franceschi
techsy105@spacm1.spac.spc.com
    
My statements may not be my companys.
Brilliant, witty saying goes here.
Newsgroups: alt.models
From: bburden@encore.com (Bruce Burden)
Subject: information on AZIMUT models?
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 16:54:46 GMT





	Would people who have worked with AZIMUT kits share their
   opinions about the accuracy, detail, fit, etc? I have never seen
   these kits, nor have I come across a kit review.

	Also, is the AZIMUT Pz 42 Maultier the same subject as the
   Italeri Opel Maultier? 





							Thanks,
								Bruce



--
Bruce Burden

						"I like bad!"
						- Thuganlitha
						"The Power and the Prophet"

Snail: Encore Computer Corp, MS407, 1801 NW 66th Ave, Plantation, FL 33313
Uucp: {pur-ee,sun,uflorida!novavax,uunet,mcnc!rti,etc}!gould!bburden
Internet: encore.COM!bburden
Newsgroups: alt.models
From: st1ec@rosie.uh.edu (Tse, Oliver)
Subject: Re: Imperial Japanese Navy Color Scheme
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 02:15:00 GMT

In article <14nfprINNep3@grapevine.EBay.Sun.COM>, tooka@train.EBay.Sun.COM writes...
>Hi,
> 
>Which reference books are you referring to? I have built several IJN (Japanese Navy)
>warships (in the 1/700 scale waterline series from Tamiya/Fujimi/Hasegawa/Aoshima)
>and the hull and superstructure colors seem to be a very standard color used
>by the IJN since the Russo-Japanese war--IJN grey (Both Tamiya and Gunze-Sangyo
>make a sample of this paint) I would describe IJN grey as a very dark grey with a
>slightly blue hue. Could this be what you are referring to?

The IJN warships had a standard grey called medium or silver-grey.  There were
many shadings of this color.  What I am looking for is a definitive light grey
that I have not found at local hobby stores.  The darker grey scheme with the
tinge of blue is not what I am looking for.  Tamiya and Gunze-Sangyo(sp?) 
products are not acceptable since I am working on a 1/144 scale R/C Yamato.  
I have found that these paints tend to chip with prolonged usage both in 
chlorinated and salt water.

>Which structures above the waterline are you referring to? searchlights? cranes?
>That may indeed require a different grey from the IJN Grey I referred to in
>my first paragraph? 

I am referring to the topside fittings, the gun turrets, the metal decks, and
major portions of the superstructure.  I intend to mix my own "silver-grey"
(as based on the books I have) and believe it to be more accurate
than any commercially available.  Unfortunately, your guess is as good as 
mine as to what it really looks like.  I suppose one could just pick up any 
shade of light grey and call it "silver-grey!" 

Thanks for your suggestions Tony.  They are much appreciated.
st1ec@rosie.uh.edu


Newsgroups: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups
From: mwp@ms9.mis.semi.harris.com (Mark W. Poole)
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 20:59:44 GMT
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne FL

>ACtually, it was originally proposed (back in '89 or so) as rec.models.misc.
>Without degenerating into a flame war, can we discuss this point? This is one
>of the things I want to iron out during the discussion period, before the 
>voting takes place...
>
>Me, I'll just be happy when we have our rec group, whether it's .scale or
>.misc. I'll still post kit reviews, I'll still try to answer new modelers'
>questions as well as I can... I just want us to go beyond the alt realm...
>

Although I only fly RC, I enjoy reading *all* of the various posts
on Scale, rubber power, Control Line, Helicopters, whatever, as long
as it flies, and I ALWAYS have the option to hit the "n" key.   
I don't, however, have any interest in cars, trains, boats, or models 
that sit on a shelf and look great, though I appreciate the skills
involved with these hobbies.

It seems a logical heirarchy would be:

rec.models.trains  - all train hobbyist activity.
rec.models.ground  - includes rc boats and cars.
rec.models.air     - includes anything that flies.
rec.models.static  - includes non-moving models. 


Of course, its just IMHO, because it suits me.

Mark.
Newsgroups: alt.models
From: rray@lookout.it.uswc.uswest.com (Randy J. Ray)
Subject: rec.models.scale discussion
Organization: US WEST Communications, Inc. -- Denver, CO
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 22:25:47 GMT

I have posted a CFD with a proposed charter, to the following groups:

alt.models
news.announce.newgroups
news.newgroups
rec.models.railroad
rec.models.rc
rec.models.rockets
sci.military

It should be forthcoming, as soon as the moderator approves it and sends it.
Remeber, the discussion period is not just for determining whether people want
the group, but also to revise the charter. Be sure to get your opinions heard.
Most of all, please vote. Our farm-team days are done. Time to play in the big
leagues.

Randy
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Randy J. Ray -- U S WEST IT/CSD         rray@{lookout,uswat}.it.uswc.uswest.com
I'd rather talk religion with Charles Manson than discuss ethics with Congress.
     -me                                                   Phone: (303)595-2852
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: alt.models
From: bednarek@bonfire (Dennis Bednarek Mfg 4-6971)
Subject: stock paint colors
Organization: GE Medical Systems, Magnetic Resonance
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 09:10:14 GMT

  does anyone know where i can obtain mixing formulas for original color paints 
for GM car models from the 50's,and 60's?
From: techsy005@spacm1.spac.spc.com (Fred Franceschi)
Newsgroups: alt.models
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
Date: 29 Jul 92 13:34:33 PDT
Organization: Security Pacific Automation Co., LA, CA

For me this newsgroup works well as is. I get a mixture of "how to"
questions and answers, disposal items, etc. It is easier for me to
monitor the relatively light traffic for this group than to monitor
several groups for the same information. If traffic was 100+ messages
a day then I would be in favor of subdividing. I think its OK as is.
-- 

Fred Franceschi
techsy105@spacm1.spac.spc.com
    
My statements may not be my companys.
Brilliant, witty saying goes here.
Newsgroups: alt.models
From: bburden@encore.com (Bruce Burden)
Subject: Re: MG34
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 16:57:41 GMT

>In article <l6rdhtINN7bj@nunki.usc.edu> grenier@nunki.usc.edu (Adrian Grenier) writes:

>Also if anyone has info on where I can get detailed machin guns (MG34 and 
>MG40 I think) I would appreciate it. The Verlinden catalog has only 
>American mg's.

	I was flipping through the "Fine Scale Modeler" Buyers Guide
    last night, and I believe that Azimut/ADV had a set that consisted
    of the MG34 and MG40. Unfortunately, I am in the middle of a move,
    and my catalogs are packed away, so I can't confirm this.




							Bruce


--
Bruce Burden

						"I like bad!"
						- Thuganlitha
						"The Power and the Prophet"

Snail: Encore Computer Corp, MS407, 1801 NW 66th Ave, Plantation, FL 33313
Uucp: {pur-ee,sun,uflorida!novavax,uunet,mcnc!rti,etc}!gould!bburden
Internet: encore.COM!bburden
Newsgroups: alt.models
From: zenith89@bwdlh130.bnr.ca (Chris VanFleet)
Subject: Re: 1985 to 1991 Crown Victoria/Grand Marquis models wanted
Reply-To: zenith89@bwdlh130.bnr.ca ()
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ltd., Ottawa, CANADA
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 11:40:42 GMT

In article <182863@pyramid.pyramid.com> pshyvers@pyrnova.pyramid.com (Peter Shyvers) writes:
>What year for each?  There's '32 and '56 Ford Vickies, 
 
Sorry, should have indicated this. I'm looking for models of the 1985
to 1991 Crown Vic & Grand Marquis. Thanks.... CPV
From: urf@ki.icl.se (Urban F)
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
X-Alternate-Address: N.G.U.Fredriksson.swe2001@oasis.icl.co.uk
Organization: None, on USENET I speak only for myself.
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 16:27:54 GMT

rick@crick.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Richard H. Miller) writes:

>Actually, since most models are by definition 'scale', I would proposed instead
>to filll the hole in the rec.models hierarchy and go ahead and propose 

>	rec.models.misc 

Makes sense to me. But as most of the traffic on alt.models seem to
be about static plastic models, we should also have a

      rec.models.plastic

rec.models.scale would leave those who model for example flat lead
figures without a place, wouldn't it?
-- 
 Urban Fredriksson   Stupid ASCII map of Sweden: /
Newsgroups: alt.models
From: kwokfm@leland.Stanford.EDU (Frankie Man Wai Kwok)
Subject: Science Fiction Models for sale
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 18:06:58 GMT

Hello, all.  I have the following models for sale.  They are unbuilt 
and are in prime condition.
I am looking for modelers in the San Francisco Bay Area who may be 
interested in them.  We could meet someplace for me to hand over the 
models. 
If interested, please e-mail to me. 

GUNDAM 0083: STARDUST MEMORIES

Bandai 1/144 GP02A Gundam		$8

GUNDAM SENTINELS

Bandai 1/144 MSA-0011(EX) Ex-S Gundam	$8

STAR WARS 

MPC Y-Wing Fighter			$5

OR all three models for the low price of $16!!  

The prices above do not include postage if I have to mail them to 
you.  Postage is an extra $2 regardless of how many models you 
would like.
Xref: sparky alt.models:1010 rec.models.railroad:1505 rec.models.rc:3120 rec.models.rockets:1989 news.groups:16267
From: pdc@lunch.wpd.sgi.com (Paul Close)
Newsgroups: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
Date: 31 Jul 92 17:41:19 GMT
Reply-To: pdc@sgi.com (Paul Close)
Distribution: na
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA
Originator: pdc@lunch.wpd.sgi.com

Randy J. Ray (rray@lookout.it.uswc.uswest.com) writes:
>In article <1992Jul29.210252.15177@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>, piz@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (G G ZIPFEL) writes:
>> 	Perhaps 
>> 
>> 	rec.models.kit 
>> 
>> 	Would be a better description of what goes on in this alt group?
>
>Unless you scratch-build things, or do major conversions... .scale and .misc
>are, to me, interchangable. There is nothing that would be appropriate in
>one that would not be, in the other. At least, nothing I can think of. 

I agree, I don't like .kit.  However, I find .scale is more focused than
.misc.  Why have a .rc, .railroad, and .rockets if you don't want
conversation in the group to be focused around a particular *type* of
modelling?  All of the discussion in .rc, .railroad, and .rockets is not
inappropriate in a .misc group, it's only that it is more likely to reach
interested readers if it is posted to the appropriate group.  .scale is an
appropriate group for discussions of scale models.

Other posters have pointed out that most groups have a .misc, and rec.models
doesn't.  No one said you can't have .sclae *and* .misc.  I think that
should be added to the proposal.

But I much prefer .scale to .misc simply because it is more focused.  In
addition, new users of the news groups who are interested in scale modeling
will know which group to go to, whereas .misc, by definition, is a catch-all.

.scale is justified by the existance of alt.models, and .misc is justified
by the lack of rec.models.misc.
-- 
Paul Close	     pdc@sgi.com	   ...!{ames, decwrl, uunet}!sgi!pdc

	"I came to Casablanca for the waters...."
		-- 'Rick', Casablanca, 1942 (50th anniversary!)
Newsgroups: alt.models
From: jhargiss@netcom.com (Jeffrey D. Hargiss)
Subject: Re: Anyone here paint RAl PARTHA mini's?
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 92 23:31:07 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

bdianton@cs.ulowell.edu (Mark Diantonio) writes:


>Hey if you paint mini's e-mail me 

>Mark DiAntonio 
>bdianton@cs.ulowell.edu
>Keywords: 
I paint thier D&D figs, if that is what you are refering to.

jhargiss@netcom.com
From: akwong@gundam.Eng.Sun.COM (Anthony Wong)
Newsgroups: alt.models
Subject: Re: Bell X-1 question
Date: 30 Jul 1992 17:53:25 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: gundam

In article <urf.712169235@sw2001> urf@icl.se writes:

[kit stuff deleted]
>
>I'd also like to know if someone knows what the TS- colour range
>Tamiya sometimes refers is?
>
>-- 
I believe the TS- color is Tamiya Spray color.  Here in the U.S. I have
never seen any of this range for sale.  I heard that importing compressed
air spray cans is difficult and expensive.  A local hobby shop in California
once had a rack of authentic race car colors from "Modelers" (I think?).
Each can was selling for US$9.00!  Typical prices are about US$2.49 retail.
Interestingly this store had them just before California voters decided to
ban all canned spray paints that didn't meet air quality standards.
Fortunately the ban has been lifted for now.

Anthony Wong


Newsgroups: alt.models
From: jac54@cas.org ()
Subject: Re: Painting a large figure model
Keywords: painting, figure
Organization: Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 10:42:56 GMT

In article <182807@pyramid.pyramid.com> pshyvers@pyrnova.pyramid.com (Peter Shyvers) writes:
>In article <36114@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> jlkim@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Justin Kim) writes:
>>
>>      The figure has a lot of creases in its clothing
>>and I can't see just painting it one color.  I think that doing so
>>would not give the proper "depth" to the clothing for it to look
>>good.  So, can anyone help me with some suggestions?
>
>Shep Paine in "How to build Dioramas" gives lots of pointers. Here's an excerpt:
>
>"...there is no point in including detail on a scale figure that would not be
>visible on a man standing an equivalent 1:1 scale distance away - if you can't
>see it in real life, you shouldn't be able to see it on a figure.

	Everything said is wonderfully useful.  A second source for
	techniques is volume V of "The Verlinden Way".  It includes
	a useful description of the methods he uses (check out the
	photos for results).  His methods are very effective but seem
	to be designed for a quick turn-round of models.  Incidentally,
	he also recommends oil paints, as do I, and use the very best
	you can afford.  I think that Caran d'Ache or Windsor&Newton
	are the best you will find in the U.S.  If you can find Scminke-
	Mussini, you are doubly blessed.

	Alec
Organization: Drama, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 18:45:37 -0400 
From: Denise Pullen <dp2r+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale

Excerpts from netnews.rec.models.railroad: 28-Jul-92 RFD:
rec.models.scale by Randy J. Ray@lookout.it. 


>                   Proposed Charter for rec.models.scale


I vote a hearty "aye" for this proposal. Anything that advances our
hobby through interaction is positive. I encourage everyone else to vote
in favor of this proposal and show active support. Thanks.
Xref: sparky alt.models:995 rec.models.railroad:1489 rec.models.rc:3094 rec.models.rockets:1970 news.groups:16223
From: smb@ulysses.att.com (Steven Bellovin)
Newsgroups: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
Date: 30 Jul 92 17:56:06 GMT
Distribution: na

Why not just call it rec.models?
Newsgroups: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups
From: sdejour@mksol.dseg.ti.com (stewart l dejournett)
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
Organization: Texas Instruments, Inc
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 18:27:33 GMT

In article <1992Jul29.135449.5007@schbbs.mot.com> yves@speedy.dev.cdx.mot.com (Yves Vidal) writes:
>In article <ceRQsFC00WB3Ab_V8W@andrew.cmu.edu> Denise Pullen <dp2r+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>>Excerpts from netnews.rec.models.railroad: 28-Jul-92 RFD:
>>rec.models.scale by Randy J. Ray@lookout.it. 
>>
>>
>>>                   Proposed Charter for rec.models.scale
>>
>>
>>I vote a hearty "aye" for this proposal. Anything that advances our
>>hobby through interaction is positive. I encourage everyone else to vote
>>in favor of this proposal and show active support. Thanks.

I am wondering why you need a seperate group to discuss scale matters, so
far I have seen little or no discussion on it in this forum and if it was
there and I was not interested I could just skip it.

Please give me some reasons why scale discussions can NOT coexist in this
group unless the scale folks think they just need to be on their own???

stewart

Newsgroups: alt.models
From: rray@lookout.it.uswc.uswest.com (Randy J. Ray)
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
Organization: US WEST Communications, Inc. -- Denver, CO
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 23:26:24 GMT

In article <1992Jul29.133433.522@spacm1.spac.spc.com>, techsy005@spacm1.spac.spc.com (Fred Franceschi) writes:
> For me this newsgroup works well as is. I get a mixture of "how to"
> questions and answers, disposal items, etc. It is easier for me to
> monitor the relatively light traffic for this group than to monitor
> several groups for the same information. If traffic was 100+ messages
> a day then I would be in favor of subdividing. I think its OK as is.

What is being proposed is not a further subdivision of the existing rec.models
groups, but rather, a moving of alt.models to the standard Usenet hierarchy.

Randy
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Randy J. Ray -- U S WEST IT/CSD         rray@{lookout,uswat}.it.uswc.uswest.com
I'd rather talk religion with Charles Manson than discuss ethics with Congress.
     -me                                                   Phone: (303)595-2852
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: alt.models
From: st1ec@rosie.uh.edu (Tse, Oliver)
Subject: Imperial Japanese Navy Color Scheme
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 19:32:00 GMT

In my reference books pertaining to the Imperial Japanese Navy of World War II,
all make reference to the color "silver grey" or "medium gray" found on the
above waterline structures of a warship.  Although this color was found in
many different shades on many vessels, I am curious to know if any model
paint company makes this color.  I have mixed my own in the proportions given
in the reference books: 15% black, 75% white, 6% brown, and 4% blue.  I know
that many companies make "greys" but I wish to be as accurate as possible
so just "any" grey will just not do.  My task would be made much easier if
I had some color photos of the actual ships(I don't even think they exist).  
Unfortunately, I am left to study black and white photographs, paintings, 
and "catalog pictures" of the models.  Hopefully, some of you out there will 
know if the color exists.  In any case, thanks for your help and response.  
I greatly appreciate it.

Oliver
st1ec@rosie.uh.edu

Newsgroups: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups
From: ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib)
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:24:41 GMT

In article <1992Jul29.205944.14272@mlb.semi.harris.com| mwp@ms9.mis.semi.harris.com (Mark W. Poole) writes:
||ACtually, it was originally proposed (back in '89 or so) as rec.models.misc.
||Without degenerating into a flame war, can we discuss this point? This is one
||of the things I want to iron out during the discussion period, before the 
||voting takes place...
||
||Me, I'll just be happy when we have our rec group, whether it's .scale or
||.misc. I'll still post kit reviews, I'll still try to answer new modelers'
||questions as well as I can... I just want us to go beyond the alt realm...
||
|
|Although I only fly RC, I enjoy reading *all* of the various posts
|on Scale, rubber power, Control Line, Helicopters, whatever, as long
|as it flies, and I ALWAYS have the option to hit the "n" key.   
|I don't, however, have any interest in cars, trains, boats, or models 
|that sit on a shelf and look great, though I appreciate the skills
|involved with these hobbies.

I've been following this thread for a little while now and I 
can finally see an argument for _not_ naming the new group 
rec.models.misc, the reason being that flying non-scale models 
are _not_ all R/C. I fly control-line myself and so do a few 
other denizens of rec.models.rc. I believe that rec.models.rc
is where CL and FF model discussion should be directed, since 
there are many common things we share with R/C, eg. motors,
covering techniques, aerodynamics. Also, CL and FF traffic by
itself doesn't warrant a separate newsgroup, and we'd lose a 
lot by skipping the R/C stuff.

Now, if a rec.models.misc gets created, I can see a situation
where some may feel that CL and FF traffic should go to the 
new group (I don't see a problem with the majority of the pos-
ters there, who would agree with me, but I can imagine there 
might be a few people who might bring this up and start a flame
war). If that happens I can also imagine that the scale people
won't be too pleased either.




-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iskandar Taib                          | The only thing worse than Peach ala
Internet: NTAIB@SILVER.UCS.INDIANA.EDU |    Frog is Frog ala Peach
Bitnet:   NTAIB@IUBACS                 !
Newsgroups: alt.models
From: kwokfm@leland.Stanford.EDU (Frankie Man Wai Kwok)
Subject: SCIENCE FICTION MODELS FOR SALE
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: ba
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 92 23:26:29 GMT

Hello, all.  I have the following models for sale.  They are unbuilt 
and are in prime condition.
I am looking for modelers in the San Francisco Bay Area who may be 
interested in them.  We could meet someplace for me to hand over the 
models. 
The prices are firm.  If interested, please e-mail to me. 

GUNDAM 0080: WAR IN THE POCKET

Bandai 1/144 MS-06FZ Zaku 		$8
Bandai 1/144 MS-09RII Dom		$8
Bandai 1/144 MS-14JG Gelgoog		$8

GUNDAM 0083: STARDUST MEMORIES

Bandai 1/144 GP02A Gundam		$8
B-Club 1/144 upgrade parts for GP02A (includes booster 'wings',
head, nuclear warhead, and other misc. parts in resin)		$20

GUNDAM SENTINELS

Bandai 1/144 MSA-0011(EX) Ex-S Gundam	$12
Bandai 1/144 FA-010-B Full Armor ZZ Gundam 	$12

ALIENS

Halycon 1/72 Colonial Marines Dropship	$30
Halycon 1/35 Colonial Marines APC	$25
Newsgroups: alt.models