HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary)
Subject: Re: too perverse? (was Re: I am Muffin! I am INVINCIBLE!)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 92 01:15:56 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA - aka Barnum & Bailey

kmj1@PL118f.cc.lehigh.edu (kate marie) wrote...
>wow, i finally got the courage to demuffin. hugs/kisses/licks, anyone?
>
*hugs*kisses*slurps*
the celebration may commence!
Welcome to soc.bi kate!
There will be an April ex-muffin initiation.  But we haven't 
worked out all the details yet <grin>.  Any suggestions gang?

Ellen

--
 Patricia "Ellen" Clary              |    "There's a lot to be said for
 pclary@polyslo.csc.CalPoly.EDU      |    an experience that's primitive."
 pclary@nike.CalPoly.EDU             |                        Riker (ST:TNG)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: dill@world.std.com (David Kaufman)
Subject: Re: too perverse? (was Re: I am Muffin! I am INVINCIBLE!)
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 18:28:42 GMT

>(We need a soc.bi welcome wagon, with a gift package of appropriate
>flirtation for each new person out of the oven.)

Then I'll post this in breathless anticipation.

        ____
-- dave \  / dill@world.std.com
         \/ dkaufman@crd.lotus.com
From: rogerk@unpc.QueerNet.ORG (Roger B.A. Klorese)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Relocation of Queer Nation Mailing List
Date: 9 Apr 92 06:17:23 GMT

The Queer Nation Mailing list is now located at on this system.

Mail to the readers of the list should be addressed to:

	qn@queernet.org
	qn%queernet.org@mips.com (if you can't deal with MX records)
	<well-connected-site>!mips!unpc!qn

Mail for administrative purposes, including requests to be added or deleted
from the list, should be sent to:

	qn-request@queernet.org
	qn-request%queernet.org@mips.com (if you can't deal with MX records)
	<well-connected-site>!mips!unpc!qn-request

This message is being posted to the GAYNET digest, and to the Usenet soc.motss
and soc.bi newsgroups, in addition to the QN list itself.  If you can think of
any other important groups or lists to nitify, contact me at the qn-request
address.
---
ROGER B.A. KLORESE                                              +1 415 ALL-ARFF
rogerk@unpc.QueerNet.ORG                 {ames,decwrl,pyramid}!mips!unpc!rogerk
"Normal is not something to aspire to, it's something to get away from."
                                                                   -- J. Foster
Newsgroups: soc.bi,soc.motss
From: STella@thelema.uucp (STella)
Subject: Mailorder Response Rates was Stonewall Postal Action Network
Organization: Idiosyncratic Anarchic Order
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 92 22:14:59 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.144523.3657@cs.tcd.ie> cjmchale@cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:
>disapointed at the response. Alan received only 122 letters from SPAN
>members but I had sent out 548. Whether we are a "scheme" or a "network"
>the operative word is *action*. If you are no longer writing most of the
>letters then, please, let me know. Photocopying, addressing, enveloping
>and sealing over 500 letters is hard, boring work for less than 25%
>response. Enough said?

Well, dear, no.  If you were selling widgets by mail-order, a _1%_
response rate would be great.  My experience with things like this
says that a 25% rate is outstanding, and that you must be doing
something VERY right.

I would suggest that what you need more than an even more phenomenal
response rate is some help getting the mailing out.  Can you find a
few folks to help?  Are any of the folks who get the mailing reachable
by email?  What can you do to cut the load on YOU, without lowering
the rate of response?

STella@xanadu.com	1016 E. El Camino Real, #302, Sunnyvale, CA 94087
From: kdc5072@cs.rit.edu (Kevin D Colagio)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: too perverse? (was Re: I am Muffin! I am INVINCIBLE!)
Date: 9 Apr 92 09:08:16 GMT
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY

In article <1992Apr08.190100.29272@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
  rivk@midway.uchicago.edu wrote...
  >In article <1992Apr08.011556.14554@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
  >>the celebration may commence!
  >>Welcome to soc.bi kate!
  >>There will be an April ex-muffin initiation.  But we haven't 
  >>worked out all the details yet <grin>.  Any suggestions gang?
  >
  >Am I invited, or did I demuffin too early?
  
  Absolutely!  March folk have the option of being on either
  the giving or receiving end (or both if you wish <grin>).
  
Giving and Receiving ends...hmmm, sounds like fun!

"the only problem with being between two men, is someone is going to get
messy!"   

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-  Kevin Colagio...student at large -  I am looking   - In Gods we trust,      =
=               aka                 =  for something  - All others pay cash.   -
-         KDC5072@cs.rit.edu        -   to put here.  -      -Vladimir Taltos  =
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: gere@umunhum.stanford.edu (Susan Gere)
Subject: Women are BLG, too! (was: Outing at the Oscars?)
Organization: Stanford University, CSL
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 01:25:59 GMT

In article <1992Mar30.181036.16830@fig.citib.com> glp@fig.citib.com (Greg Parkinson) writes:
>In article <1992Mar29.060323.24056@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, keb3@po.CWRU.Edu (Keith E. Bitely) writes:
> | 
> | Besides, I consider AIDS as much a part
> | of the Queer movement as I consider abortion part of the Queer movement. 
>
> Then you are one very clueless child.
>
> | While there may be some overlaps, abortion and AIDS are two distinct issues
> | that can be set apart from gay/bi/les issues. 
				  ^^^^		  Oh, REally. ?!!

--can I add that this is a very androcentric statement?  Lesbian *women* 
have babies and will suffer the consequences of any restrictive laws. 

Granted, the "purely" homosexually active are at low risk for unplanned 
pregnancies (ignoring incest/rape/medically necessary situations), but 
I know few men or women who can claim exclusivity over a lifetime. and 
Murphy's Law (no, no, not peg!) undoubtedly provides for more mistakes in 
unfamiliar situations (young; experimenting w/the "other side"; whatever).

I was surprised and proud to see the large lesbian/gay presence at
the pro-choice rally in San Francisco last week, where I marched with
my women's group carrying "Bisexuals for Choice" :-) signs, along with
two "Lesbian Moms: Pro-child, Pro-choice". The Sisters of Perpetual
Indulgence were there, too.

Choice, (not "abortion" :-P), is the operative word. It applies to all 
aspects of our sexuality//the right to do what we will with our bodies.

Sorry, but I see this as pretty largely a *human* issue that cannot
be extricated from any cause as broad as the les/bi/gay movement. And,
as has been brought up lately, it can also affect LBG's from both ends
of the question: will the "Pro-lifers" make exceptions for fetuses
presumed to be future homosexuals--another in the "weird inconsistencies 
in politics" series? ::It is in our self-interest to promote fair and 
supportable laws for everyone.

Other questions: 
  (Relating to the right to be a wanted child:) 
- Do women who are victims of incest/sexual abuse shift nn points 
  on the Kinsey scale in response?  (my limited knowledge says yes.
  this is no reason to encourage it!!)

- Are there any good statistics on to what extent LBG people reproduce?

  My guess is that it is substantial, though lower than... er, "breeders".

(Finally:)  I'm *not* trying to start a flame war. Smileys don't seem 
appropriate, but how about- I dunno- warm but serious hugs? ()()() <-that's 
them... :}
From: gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca (Gene Ward Smith)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Courage, Shift Happens!
Date: 9 Apr 92 22:03:00 GMT
Organization: Centre Interuniversitaire en Calcul Mathematique Algebrique

In article <1992Apr7.075310.12527@thelema.uucp> STella@thelema.uucp
(STella) writes:

>(The reason I call him twin is that there is a certain resemblance --
>Daffodil commented that when he saw the two of us come in with wjr, he
>thought "STella brought her brother?  I didn't know she had one.")

Well, I have a sister and people have commented on our resemblence.
But she isn't anything like you--she's a big-busted woman who owns a
gun and is a good shot, for instance. Also, she takes no guff from
anyone.

One the other hand she's five feet tall, so maybe that's the
similarity.
--
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/CICMA/Concordia University 
                  gsmith@concour.cs.concordia.ca
From: nmw1638@cs.rit.edu (Nicolas M Williams)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Women are BLG, too! (was: Outing at the Oscars?)
Date: 13 Apr 92 13:24:21 GMT
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY

In article <1992Apr12.195632.24722@amhux2.amherst.edu> twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
>In article <1992Apr12.175124.14167@midway.uchicago.edu> pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>>In article <31593@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> jclark@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (John Clark) writes:
>>>In article <1992Apr9.210657.2253@wam.umd.edu> sfjr@wam.umd.edu (Steve Russell) writes:
>>>'cause men don't get abused. And if they dd,o the abused becomes homosexual
>>>too, since the the perpatrator is a male.
>>                                         ^^^^^^^^^^ 
>>isn't there supposed to be a smiley here?  (please say yes...)
>
>I'm pretty sure there was.

There must have been, and I should have noticed it was probably a
sarcastic comment, before reacting to this the way I did.

>homosexuality rather than pedophilia.  As long as there is a negative
>view towards homosexual activities, man-boy pedophilia (which is very
>often equated with a homosexual orientation) will go underreported.

Probably true, but all forms of sexual abuse are underreported as it is.

Nick
--
                                                           ______         
E-mail: nmw1638@cs.rit.edu Phone: (716) 475-3716           \ \/ /       
Mail: CPU 645, 25 Andrews Memorial Dr, Rochester, NY 14623  \/\/
Disclaimer: My opinions are mine!
From: max@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu (Max Handelsman: liberal hippie subversive dude.)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Dominos (was: De-muffining, me too!)
Date: 13 Apr 92 21:57:41 -0400
Organization: The Loonie Bin

In article <9204132214.AA24165@ebt-inc>, ebt-inc!pks@uunet.UU.NET (Pearl Stark) writes:
> 
>     -> was Sharon's in Wash. DC!  Anyone for a NE get-together?
>     -> 
>     -> 		-Max
> 
> North East US?  I'm all for it.
> Hey if you support my "providence as a soc.bi hotspot" campaign, I'll
> come to your party.
> sort of a you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours...
> or was that you rub my back, I'll rub yours, or ...
> anyway, it could be fun.  anyone else coming?
> pearl 

	Hey, I know a few bi's in Providence...pretty much the only people 
I know in Providence, too.  One's a friend of about 6 years.
	Do the names Geri Weitzman and Drew Lewis ring any bells?  Geri 
founded Bisexu-l (a listserv group), and Drew is actually in Boston, I 
think...I dunno, I'm from NY City, it's all the same to me. =)
	And as for the backrubs...you've got a deal.

Max Handelsman, Drew University       | MHANDELS@DREW.{DREW.EDU,BITNET}
"An it harm none, do what thou wilt." | MAX@DRYCAS.{CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU,BITNET}
"Deesclaimer? We don' need no         | MHANDELS@ISIS.CS.DU.EDU
 steenking deesclaimer!"              | This space rented by Squire Phish.
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: STella@thelema.uucp (STella)
Subject: And Now You Aren't One was A Question- "Muffin"? "De-muffining"?
Organization: Idiosyncratic Anarchic Order
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 01:58:47 GMT

In article <+93tjsh@rpi.edu> monitn@jec316.its.rpi.edu (Nicholas Monitto) writes:
>  Hi folks! Just wondering... I've sat here reading the posts for a while, 
>and one thing has been eluding me. What exactly is a "muffin"? And what is 
>"de-muffining"? Just wondering... :)

While you were sitting here just reading the posts, you were a muffin.
When you posted an article asking what-is-it-a-muffin, you demuffined.

Lurker no more, you have also reminded me of the dude in the play
(Moliere?) who was amazed/impressed to learn that he'd been speaking
in prose....

Muffin:  A lurker on soc.bi
Demuffining:  Posting one's first article to soc.bi.

(I still think bi-scuit would be preferable, but so it goes.)

STella@xanadu.com	1016 E. El Camino Real, #302, Sunnyvale, CA 94087
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: orc@vpnet.chi.il.us (david parsons)
Subject: Re: too perverse? (was Re: I am Muffin! I am INVINCIBLE!)
Organization: Department of Atomic Text Units
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1992 17:25:13 GMT

In article <KMJ1.92Apr6235614@PL118f.cc.lehigh.edu> kmj1@PL118f.cc.lehigh.edu (kate marie) writes:
|wow, i finally got the courage to demuffin. hugs/kisses/licks, anyone?
|
|
|kate

   (We need a soc.bi welcome wagon, with a gift package of appropriate
flirtation for each new person out of the oven.)

   As for now, we'd be happy to do a topological survey of you using nothing
but our tongues.  Even on short notice, soc.bi is willing - and believe me,
it's no inconvenience whatsoever - to perform whatever actions are needed to
welcome one to the net ;-)


                __
  david parsons \/ math queer
From: wells@cs.hw.ac.uk (Francis Wells)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Tori Amos
Keywords: beautiful talented pianist singer redhead
Date: 13 Apr 92 12:55:09 GMT
Organization: Dept of Computer Science, Heriot-Watt University, Scotland

In article <20101@castle.ed.ac.uk> sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Sara's ElectroPostie) writes:
>Um, what I had in mind definitely sounds like Kate to me, it was mainly
>the piano ysee and piano doesn't feature prominently in Siouxsie's
>stuff.  But vocally there could be comparisons except that Siouxsie
>usually sings flat and Tori doesn't and their voices are totally
>different.  Don't get me wrong, I'm a big Siouxsie fan as *well* as a
>Kate fan. 
>Sara
I wanted to draw on that sort of dream-like (nightmarish) music with which Tori
seems to be obsessed in some of her songs.  Unlike Kate (Who's probably my
all time fave) Tori also manages to enunciate her words (in that half-sighed
half-seductive breathy fashion - ooooh!).

I can't disagree with you though.

Huggles
	Frankums.

P.S. Yes I'm at Bricktown.  The department moves out at the end of May, but I 
live here.
______________________________________________________________________________
        This pink triangle was drawn \bi/ Francis Joseph Wells
B4 f t g++ k+(+) s+ p                 \/                    wells@hci.hw.ac.uk
From: SBIT37@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Outing at the Oscars? (Was: Why are you all s
Date: 6 Apr 92 13:00:44 GMT
 4170@vaxa.weeg.uiowa.edu> <y66gb2dv@cck.coventry.ac.uk><30666@skye.dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Organization: University of Liverpool

In article <30666@skye.dcs.ed.ac.uk>, db@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Dave Berry) says:
>
>In article <y66gb2dv@cck.coventry.ac.uk> idx009@cck.coventry.ac.uk (the Crisco
>Kid) writes:
>>Joe Orton.  His lover was Kenneth Halliwell (I think).  Didn't know about a
>>film; there's a good biography called "Prick up your ears".
>
>The film has the same name and is written by Alan Bennett.  Like most Bennett,
>it's full of dry, understated humour.  Like most Bennett, it's very good.
>
There are also _The Orton Diaries_ edited by John Lahr (Orton's biographer)
which make an entertaining read.

>Dave.
>--
> Dave Berry, LFCS, Edinburgh Uni.      db%dcs.ed.ac.uk@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk

Paul (who's just found out how to copy previous article into XEDIT on this
miserable machine.)
From: jtan@cc.weber.edu (THE TAN MAN)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re:   Bisexuality Questions
Date: 7 Apr 92 00:04:00 GMT
Reply-To: JTAN@cc.weber.edu
Organization: Weber State University CS Department
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <rhialto.001s@falu.sneakernet>, rhialto@falu.sneakernet (Olaf
Seibert) writes...
>Ob is short for obligatory. Used when you bring up something unrelated to the
>newsgroup, but want to make up for it. In this case, I thought I should
>add some feelings.

	Sounds kind of funny, but makes sense.
	Thanks!

ObBiRights:  Has anyone written a paper on the rights of bisexuals
	or homosexuals?
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov ( Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: "Sex-education" and homo-bi-sexuality.
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center And Storm Door Company
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 18:52:17 GMT

In article <1992Apr4.165832.23142@cs.tcd.ie> cjmchale@cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:
>In <ktr279INNimg@network.ucsd.edu> thom@crayfish.uucp (Thom Cleland) writes:
>>Of course, in many traditional cultures, homosexuality is normal and 
>>integrated with cultural mores... often gays are given very special
>>and venerated roles in society.  (shouldn't say "often", I only know
>>of a few...).  So who's to say if we're moving forward or back.
>
>Unless you can provide some details about these societies, the only

Well, I can provide very few details, but I do know that in Hawaii, families
which had an excess number of male children would bring some of them up as
females.  Not quite relevant, but the tradition led to a very understanding
attitude toward homosexuals, as well as toward cross-dressers.  Much of this
still was around when I was growing up there (not long ago), although the
missionary influence did a lot to supress it.
--scott
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde)
Subject: Re: too perverse? (was Re: I am Muffin! I am INVINCIBLE!)
Followup-To: soc.bi
Reply-To: Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde)
Organization: Ministry of Silly Walks
            <1992Apr4.071529.25578@casbah.acns.nwu.edu> 
            <KMJ1.92Apr6235614@PL118f.cc.lehigh.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 04:33:40 GMT

In article <KMJ1.92Apr6235614@PL118f.cc.lehigh.edu> 
kmj1@PL118f.cc.lehigh.edu (kate marie) writes:
>In article <1992Apr4.071529.25578@casbah.acns.nwu.edu> 
Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde) writes:
>
>>(Does anyone out there have a fetish or even a twinge for tall people with 
>>long (if thinning) curly *brown* hair?...)
>
>>Albert "Don't Dream It Be It" Lunde
>
>long hair? i loooove long hair...my SO's hair (hi lewis!) is halfway down 
>his back by now...and one of by best friends (unfortunately straight) has
>RED hair to her waist. mmmm...
>
>wow, i finally got the courage to demuffin. hugs/kisses/licks, anyone?
>
>
>kate
<comes closer, smiles, ...>

reaches out in a big *hug*

<Whispers... "Welcome to soc.bi">

<playfully nibbles on an ear...>

<Mmmm...>

-- 
 Albert Lunde         | Interfaith  |     *Y*Y*      "A branch on the
 Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu |  Bisexual   |      *Y*        tree of life"
 alunde@nuacvm.bitnet |  Feminist   |.......|.........................
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde)
Subject: Studies of Bis (was Re: Coming out to teachers...)
Followup-To: soc.bi
Reply-To: Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde)
Organization: Ministry of Silly Walks
            <3070@cs.rit.edu> 
            <1992Apr10.143828.13431@amhux2.amherst.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 06:06:56 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.143828.13431@amhux2.amherst.edu> 
twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
>
>Very little has been explicitly published on bisexuality, and there
>exist no actual studies of bisexual identity or behavior that I know
>of.
>
Someone else mentioned the bibliography in Tom Geller's book. Reprinted
in this book is "Sexual Orientation: A Multivariable Dynamic Process" by
Fritz Klein et. al.

This focused on a sample of 384 respondents to a questionnaire in (Penthouse)
Forum - 172 of whom identified as bisexual.

This article and other studies of bisexuality appeared originally in
Journal of Homosexuality Vol 11 Numbers 1/2 spring 85, and which was
reprinted as both:
"Bisexualities: Theory and Research" and

"Two Lives to Lead: Bisexuality in Men and Women" ISBN 0-918393-22-1

I think Ron Fox is still active, I recall hearing second hand that he read 
a paper based on his survey at a recent conference.

I would agree with the general thrust of your remarks. There have been
few if any studies of bisexuals based on large radomized samples.  Indeed, 
federal funding for more than one study of sexual behaviour has been 
canceled due to political pressure; so even an update to Kinsey is needed.

On the other hand, this says that our anecdotal evidence is more important.

I suspect some of us have met or talked with more bisexuals that the authors of
some clinical studies on bisexuality. (Klein's sample mentioned above
is fairly large - many articles are based on samples of twenty or thirty).

We have to be careful about generalizing from our particular experience,
but it is at least easy to disprove sweeping statements "all bis are X",
if one has a stock of real-life counter-examples.

<Ob flirt:> <Come up and see me some time...><wink><wink>

-- 
 Albert Lunde         | Interfaith  |     *Y*Y*      "A branch on the
 Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu |  Bisexual   |      *Y*        tree of life"
 alunde@nuacvm.bitnet |  Feminist   |.......|.........................
From: penguin@reed.edu (Steven Millman)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Swain
Date: 13 Apr 92 06:02:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Apr13.060237.190
Organization: Reed College, Portland OR

Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Gender Non-Specific Persons, Thy Game Is Flirt!!!
Summary: Flirting
Expires: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: Reed College, Portland OR
Keywords: flirt, gender non-specific, GNS

To all you wonderful gender non-specific persons, I have a message:

	Many long and lingering strokes accross your tingling flesh in front
of a fireplace with a thunderstorm utside and as many glasses of 1977 Dow
vintage Port as it takes to get around to you all. 

Much cuddles, of course and a wet sloppy smooch to Lynne who just de-muffined.


Penguin
From: gtoal@castle.ed.ac.uk (Graham Toal)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Bi Quotes and Red Heads
Date: 8 Apr 92 01:06:49 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

In article <1992Apr7.001114.2757@midway.uchicago.edu> pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>beat, too...  mmmmmm... *can we do color gifs?  i know have *one*
>more reason to  visit seattle (and wash u).  

The other reason to wash her is to get the nutella off...

G
From: nmw1638@cs.rit.edu (Nicolas M Williams)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: e-flirts
Date: 12 Apr 92 18:23:21 GMT
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY

>>>>>>Flirtitiously munching on the back of the entire newsgroup's neck:
>>>>>Flirtatiously nibbling the *big toes* of the entire newsgroup...
>>>>Sensually massaging the lower back of the entire newsgroup...
>>>Flirtatiously spinning my favorite whip at the entire newsgroup....
>>Oooh yes, yes - but lash me gently, Stella ...
>>Flirtatiously playing Bzzzttt with the whole newsgroup ...
>Flirtatiously blowing bubbles over the whole scene...

Sensually running my fingers over the newsgroup's most erogenous zones ;-)...

>Steph

Is this turning into a cascade?

Nick 
--
                                                           ______         
E-mail: nmw1638@cs.rit.edu Phone: (716) 475-3716           \ \/ /       
Mail: CPU 645, 25 Andrews Memorial Dr, Rochester, NY 14623  \/\/
Disclaimer: My opinions are mine!