From: eleeaf9@rosie.uh.edu (92F10560)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.hongkong,talk.politics.china
Subject: Look, what a fantastic way of argueing by steve !
Date: 17 Dec 1992 00:09 CST
Organization: University of Houston
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: rosie.uh.edu
Summary: count how many dirty words this guy used,then you know...
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

Count how many dirty words this steve used in his short response,
count how many good points, good reasoning or facts he introduced,
count how many HK democracy fighters,TIers present their argument
in this fantastic way,then you'll know who is rude, who is narrow
minded, who is unreasonable.

> 
>>In the following, I intend to analyse the common interest
>>between China and Hong Kong in the following areas: history,
>>geography, economy, politics.
> 
>>1. History.
> 
>>Before 1950, the economy of Hong Kong was poor and the living
>>... <Bullshit delete>
      ^^^^^^^^  dirty word 1
> 
>  Save your effort, you don't even know the history and I am not going
>to teach you. "Mo(No) Liao(mateiral) Ban(pretend) DoiBiu(representative)"
> 
>>2. Geography.
>>...<Typical nosense deleted>
> 
>>3. Economy
>>...<Shit deleted>
      ^^^^     dirty word 2  
> 
>>4. The property industry collapes. 
>>...(sorry, I run out of vocabulary to describe this)
>            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   
             good reasoning 1
>>J Chen
>>Department of Chemistry
>>University of Michigan
> 
>  I won't call Jian Chen dog, becuase I don't want to humiliate dog. In
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
            good reasonin 2

>fact, if I call something Jian Chen, it will the most insulting word
 ^^^^  --------------------------------------------------------------
 fact 1
>ever used to insult that object. Anyway, I don't expact Jian Chen to
---------------------------------
>read this since that jerk is unreasonable. But for those reasonable
>people who don't know HK that much, sincerly I want to tell you, most
>of the information about HK in the mainland Chinese propagada are not
>true. They are either partly true or all lies. If any of you really
       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
       then what is the truth ??? where are your facts ???

>want to know about how HK has developed, it will be a long story, but,
>I guess, I can spend sometime to compile those materials.
>                   

Don't eat your words. I'll be waiting to see. C. Jian at least gave
some facts,how can you convince others if you can't have facts to
beat him ? 

>  When I was a sophomore, I worked on a project about studying HK's
>development and we (my collegue and I) spends six month's for data
>collecting and research, after all, Jian Chen's article about HK is
>only his ignorance and his imagination.
> 
>  The way I see J Chen is just the way I see the CG, just ignore it.
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     good reasoning 3
> 
>  steve


I really don't dare to give you my name,cause I am afraid of your ability
of using insulting words. Forgive me.

>--
>stevew@helios.unl.edu  |=| \ Fender / |=| ... smoke on the water, fire in
>                       |=|   \    /   |=| the sky...   Smoke on the water.
>stevew@hoss.unl.edu    |=|     \/     |=|     (36 bars guitar solo)
>		      Deep purple, the best
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china