HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: EFS6ET1@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL -- Misc (D&D)
Date: 26 Jan 93 23:44:13 GMT
Reply-To: ecz5mxr@mvs.oac.ucla.edu

In article <1k3narINNerg@lynx.unm.edu>, on 26 Jan 1993 16:02:35 GMT,
vickie@carina.unm.edu (Victoria Hamilton) writes:

>Razzie, I do understand your problems with this triangle.  It should have
>happened a year and a half ago.  But since I never for one second believed
>that Drake loved Icky, I can get past that.  I was slightly irate when
>Rebecca mentioned Drake's string of women.  I'm much more inclined to

Hiya Vickie,
Thanks.  That really is my problem.  For me, they waited 1 1/2 too
long.  Like you, I never thought Icky and Drake had the least chemistry,
but Drake/Roman and Diana sure did.  So I'll give you that.  (Actually,
I thought Drake/Roman had chemistry with both Yvette and Danielle, but
that's another story.)  I don't think Drake/John (whatever!) is the one
who looks bad in this.  He's a grieving widower who's turning to his
former love.

>believe that he loved Diana than that lump of a chameleon head.  AND if
>they say one more time that Marlena loved Drake because she thought he
>was Roman I am going to scream.  That is NOT how it happened.  She loved him
>when she thought he was Stefano.  Personally, I think he is more the love
>of her life than Wayne.  AND this latest radar between the two of them
>was a regular thing in the old days not something new to their current
>incarnation.

And you're also right about Marlena loving John Black, whether he
was Stefano or Roman.  But they made him Roman and played it as a
continuation of that love.  Then Wayne came back (at Deidre's
insistence I might add) and suddenly, there was the "real" Roman.
And for the past year and a half, there's been no mention of anything
between John and Marlena.  Nothing sub rosa, no subtext nothing.
Marlena loved her "true love," Roman.  Then suddenly she falls down
a hole and it's love again?  Again, my problem is with the writing,
not the actors.  To me, this story makes Marlena look bad.
There she was in the shower with Roman and then she was dreaming about
John.  Yes, I know people can be torn, but she doesn't really play it
that way.  She plays it like she loves Roman.

>Anyway, I'll follow this storyline anywhere.  It's the best thing on the
>show right now and far better than anything we've been offered in years.

Any story without Carly is OK with me.  But I just don't see Jim Reilly
as the show's savior.  (Of course, I'm mad he fired SSH.)

>Finally, where the heck is Spud??!!

>Vickie

Yeah, Spud, where are you???

*Razzie (who'll over-explain almost anything)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: Joanna L. Castillo <pefv702@utpe.pe.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: DOOL: do the big boys know?
X-Xxdate: Thu, 21 Jan 93 18:18:56 GMT
Organization: UT Petroleum Engineering Dept.
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d17
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 17:18:51 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.154526.22718@novell.com> M'Linda Taylor, mlinda@novell.com writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.173526.26631@scott.skidmore.edu> lperkins@saims.skidmore.edu (linda perkins) writes:
>>Geeezzz Cranberry, your cup said "GRRRR".  I must have gotten one out
>>of the bargin batch.  People get the picture anyway because of the
>>bumper sticker over my terminal that says "COME NEAR ME AND I'LL KILL
>>YOU".
>
>Hum, sounds like you may enjoy my coffee cup.
>
>Picture of frazzled woman in rumpled "Power Suit" at desk *heaped*
>with papers.
>
>Underneath:  
>
>Caution!  This mug contains scalding hot coffee, if you make a sexist
>remark to me I'll dump it in your crotch.  Have a nice day.

Geez...all I have is a scowl.  It does seem effective, though.  :)

>Noberry........

'Easy enough to remedy, M'Linda!  :)

Joanna.

--
| "Whenever I dwell for any length of time on my own shortcomings, they     |
| gradually begin to seem mild harmless, rather engaging little things, not |
| at all like the staring defects in other people's characters." -- so said |
| Margaret Halsey   |   pefv702@utpe.pe.utexas.edu Hook 'em! Gus-ball, '93! |
From: RAMETZ01@ULKYVM.BITNET (Robert A. Metzger)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB: Cruz' history
Date: 21 Jan 93 16:35:08 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <1993Jan20.080947.17403@netcom.com>, cap@netcom.com (Caroline
Smrstik) says:
>
>In remembering Cruz' other lovers, no one has yet mentioned Tori. Isn't she
>actually Chip's mother? I remember something about Cruz saving her from
>drowning; they might have only slept together once but there was Chip.
>Cruz (and Eden) ended up with the Chipster because of Tori's cocaine
>problems. She dried out and went to Hollywood to pursue her acting
>career and live happily ever after.
>
This is true.  But didn't Tori keep Cruz drugged for a while so she could be
with him??

>Wait, Tori was also involved with Mason-- did she try to convince him
>that the baby was his or something? I think Tori and Mason (the substance-
>abuse twins) were even married at some point.
>
Tori was married to Mason I thought, and if not, they lived together.  I think
Tori tried to pass Chip off as her and Mason's, but Mason knew it was Cruz'.
And when she had the problem with drugs (cocaine I believe) Tori wanted Cruz
to look after Chip.  I think Cruz found out Chip was his after Chip was stolen.
Anyone else remember more??
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: klong@sura.net (K.A. Long)
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: more on homosexuality
Organization: SURAnet, College Park, MD, USA, NA, Earth, Milky Way
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:59:42 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.130216.4132@oz.plymouth.edu> patstew@oz.plymouth.edu (Pat Steward) writes:
>
>And another good-natured poke:
>
>Who was the Bible written by?  MEN!!!!!!!!!!  Hahahahahahahaha!
>-- 
>Patricia Martin Steward                      patstew@oz.plymouth.edu
>I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is;
>I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express senti-
>ments that differentiate me from a doormat.       Rebecca West, 1913

I've been doing some reading-not extensive-about a related subject.
According to the texts, religion was primarily a feminine doctrine
with the "all powerful" being a goddess, instead of a god.  That it
was only with the coming of Christianity that god became male and
women were denied positions in the church.  Any anthro/archeological
types out there care to comment?

klong

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Can it get any worse?
Organization: AT&T
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:05:25 GMT

In article <19930125101925EFS6ET1@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU> ecz5mxr@mvs.oac.ucla.edu writes:
>
>(Caution, DOOL bashing) First, is Carly truly a wonderdoc or what?
>All she need do is glance at a small stain on a shirt, and she can
>immediately identify it as blood.  Amazing, isn't it?  (Or would


Well, to tell the truth, I found this quite believable.   When
Carly insisted it was blood I thought to myself "Well, she would
know, she's supposed to be a doctor."   



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
|  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
|  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: Mike.Dunnagan@launchpad.unc.edu (Mike Dunnagan)
Subject: Re: GH:  Brenda on Vicki!
Keywords: gh, brenda
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:46:02 GMT

> For those who are interested - the actress who plays Brenda is supposed
> to be on Vicki!, Tuesday the 26th.

Cool. Thanks.

Mike Dunnagan ---

--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
From: llmacdon@orion.oac.uci.edu (Linda Macdonald)
Subject: Re: AMC: An Li
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 21 Jan 93 22:31:58 GMT

>>
>>Okay now, wait a minute here.  I *must* have missed something
>>somewhere along the line...how could Taylor and Terrence "get
>>together?"  Aren't they related by the fact that they have the SAME
>>FATHER?  Or (and this is what I may have missed), is Lucas only
>>Taylor's step-father, and no biological relation to her at all?
>>
>>"Too-busy-to-always-read-every-single-post" minds want to know!
>>
>Just in case you havent heard Taylor is biologically related 
>to Lucas. However Terrence is really his son.
>
I think you mean Taylor is NOT biologically related to Lucas.  Lucas
is her step-father.

Linda Lou
>Frank
>
>
>


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kriesel@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Julie R Kriesel)
Subject: Re: ATWT:  TAN and stuff
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:55:22 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.210607.15541@walter.bellcore.com> semele@oscar.bellcore.com (Semele Halkedis) writes:
>In article <1993Jan23.213520.2574@news.stolaf.edu>, kriesel@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Julie R Kriesel) writes:
[stuff about me getting into grad school deleted]

>
>Congrats, SpecialK!!  Do you all realize what this means - 
>we get to have a party to celebrate -- I'll bring the lime green jello . . .
>(Perhaps we can combine this with the VD soiree?)
>
>GGG

Sounds like a great idea to me.  I'll bring the toys, but I'll have to
remember to get the new batteries for my electric pickle.  It was making
the funniest noise last night...but maybe that was because EtTu had
been using it earlier.  

So, is this party formal or what?  I just got this new rhinestone-studded
hospital gown that I'm dying to wear.  Although maybe I'll just go with
the mauve silk straightjacket with the lace trim.  I don't know...

Back to work for me...

Special K




>|                            | (corrected courtesy of a net.friend) | 
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: kr1t+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kathryn C. Rollenhagen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: phoebe's house
Date: 27 Jan 93 08:38:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.QfNhOpe00iV0442ktd
Organization: Junior, English, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

>>Patricia writes:
>>Wildwind.  Can anyone remember the last time they shot a scene at 
>>Phoebe's?
> 
>    I have a TERRIBLE memory, but could it have been as far back as the
>    meeting erica held at Pheobe's when she was trying to get back Jack?
>    The environmental meeting?  I can picture it, but can't remember details..

wasn't the last time for trevor and natalie's wedding?  when erica had
on the towel and ran around in the woods with dimitri?  

altho i could be mistaken.

--kate (lurker extraordinaire)
From: shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan R. Hagan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: TAN: How many Susans? (Was:Aaron Neville)
Date: 27 Jan 93 14:28:26 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

rose@cecily.UUCP (Rose M. Delckum) writes:

>In article <Jan.20.12.47.04.1993.538@gandalf.rutgers.edu>, Susan R. Hagan writes:

>> IDSWB@ASUACAD.BITNET writes:

>> Well, maybe I can come up with a nickname for myself anyway.  I'll have
>> to think about it.
>    
>     Could come in handy.  I was under the impression we had Susan McConigha...
>oh, I neer could spell her name!  Sis Apple, currently on hiatus.  And Sue
>Metzger.  And Sue Bachus.  That's why I was getting confused with all the
>Susans.  And of course, Tim and Rick's wife is Susan...

Well, I'll have to work on it.  

>> >that everyone disagrees with and see how many flames you get.  You'll
>> >understand real quick :-)
>> 
>> Oh, like I don't already?  :)  I find that my opinion is often in the
>> minority - and thats where I like it!

>     Oh dear.  Just what we needed.  Someone who *likes* flamewars.
>:-)

I love a good debate - but not necessarily a flame war.  Flame wars
get old quickly and people get hurt.  Debates can go on for a long
time and everyone learns something. :)

BTW, since I've rearranged my VCR and accessories, I have yet to get
into the hang of proper taping procedures, which means I missed 
Monday and Tuesday (1/25 & 1/26).  Are updates on the way?

First, can someone tell me what Nicky was yelling about in the Friday
"cliffhanger"?

-- 
Susan R. Hagan (shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu) 
Publications Coordinator - User Services
Rutgers University Computing Services
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mgtaylor@eos.ncsu.edu (Mary Molly G Taylor)
Subject: Re: LOV:  Up.dater for absent one
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 22:11:17 GMT

In article <20JAN199312025461@xenon.arc.nasa.gov> holst@xenon.arc.nasa.gov (Laura Holst) writes:
>
>We have a surrogate updater!  Thank you, Bob Willers!
>(Are you a lurker, Bob?)  Well, you got both days
>now!  AND, since ABC is "blessed" with the Moron
>inaguration... no WED update :(  but...

>Amelia Heinle joins the show January 19 as STEPHANIE
>BAXTER, who will try to come between ALLY and CASEY.
>
>Can't wait for this one.

Is it just me, or does she have that same Noxema face look that Hannah has?


-- 
MaryMolly G. Taylor
mgtaylor@eos.ncsu.edu	|	Applied Energy Research Laboratory
(919) 515-5240		|	Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Dept.
Fax:  (919) 515-7968	|	North Carolina State University
From: gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: those damn interruptions...
Date: 21 Jan 93 19:02:13 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1993Jan18.173649.25519@leland.Stanford.EDU>, thompson@waldron.Stanfo
rd.EDU (Sharon Thompson-Schill) writes:
>
>Over the past few months I've noticed the conversations about
>interrupting soaps to give important news flashes (like the next cabinet
>appointee) and I've held my tounge because it seems hard to say that our
>soap is more important than national and world news. But this weekend,
>while watching the AFC and NFC championships games, I was shocked to see
>that they would not break in on football to discuss the military action
>in Iraq -- instead, our local station ran one of those repeating
>messages at the bottom of the screen advising viewers to stay tuned for
>the news report following the game.
>
>OK, now I'm going to start taking news breaks personally!
>
>Sharon
>
It's all a question of priorities.  I mean, really, interrupt the AFC and NFC
championship games?  That's sacreligious!  And I say all this very
sarcastically.

Your point is well made.  After all, and I will once more be sarcastic, only a
"bunch of bored housewives" watch soaps and only "real men" watch football!
Or maybe they figure anyone who watches football has no idea of what's
happening in the real world, whereas, those who watch soaps are the most
intelligent and aware people on earth.

One must wonder who makes these decisions at the networks.  Have you also ever
wondered why it takes 10 minutes to give us 1 minute's worth of news?  [Maybe
another football parallel here - after all it takes about 10 minutes to play
the last minute of a football game.]  First, we have the network intro and
LOGO, then the anchor saying what's coming up, then the actual news point,
then the network song/LOGO/etc.
-- 

------------------------
|   Gail A. Fullman    |
|   Manager - ADMO     |
|   Ext. 83113         |
------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: "T. Burgess "New Year's Resolutions 'CHEAP' While supplies last"" <tburgess@us.oracle.com>
Subject: OLTL:  IMHO
Original-To: amcnet
Organization: Computer Science, Indiana University
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 13:51:59 PST



<From: patricia@pete.uucp (Patricia Peterson)
<Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
<Subject: OLTL:  IMHO

<Is anyone else getting tired of the story lines on this show.

YES!!

<I am tired of seeing Victorian agonize over General Sleeze.

Sleep with him....marry him or go back to Clint and sit on it!

<I am tired of watching Clint, I'm just a powderkeg, Buchannan
<blow up at everybody.

Someone light a match and let him explode....he has gone off the deep end.

<I am tired of watching Asswipe and Blaring butt heads.

Go girl!

<I tired of Lunatic agonizing over whether to sleep with Maxipad,
<and Maxipad's insistance that she do it before Valentine's Day.

hit the sheets and do the happy slappy thigh dance(grandma's creation)
or Do do do run da way and not do it....

<I am tired of C-ain't telling the truth and Tiny Toons' on again
<off again love affair.

Bring back Cord so we have a new face to look at before we get too bored!

<I'm vey tired of Kretin dangling Duke in front of Leakin Brain.

Papa do right by the Duke of Pearl!

<Bring back Billy Douglas and Joey Buchannan, at least they have
<interesting lives.  What ever happen to the storyline about the
<gay student body president?  How is Billy getting along at school
<these days.  How about having a gay teacher come on to him and
<showing that it is not only straight people who have to go through
<sexual harrasment.

Let's deal or look at some real life issues that mean something...

<Or for that matter why not have Alana being sexually harrased by a
<teacher at school or maybe Rachael Gannon.

Not a bad suggestion!

<Bring back Bo's smile.  

I saw him on the Walton's he was about to marry Mary Ellon but she dropped him
at the last moment...he was a doctor with money.

<Now that Who's the Boss is off the air how about bringing back
<Judith Light as Karen Wolek.  It would be great to see Dr. Larry
<in a storyline that didn't involve the hospital.

That is right.....Judith...dye those roots and get your self back where you
belong...Let larry be the boss!

<Give Suede something to do besides tend bar.  What ever happen to 
<his passion for song writing.  Looks like the writers dropped the
<ball on this one also.

Let's see if he has some talent...instead of using him in a music video 
pining after Luna...

<Well, I guess I've vented enough for one day.

I must say yuou have had some really good things to vent over....

<Patricia

<Patricia Peterson   (608)273-4573
<Inet: patricia%pete%nicmad%astroatc.uucp@spool.cs.wisc.edu

Tia"Cut! Take Two...let's see some action in this soap!"Burgess
From: casper@tsoft.net (Johanne Kaminski)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN:  Changing your name
Date: 27 Jan 93 10:29:05 GMT
Organization: TSoft BBS and Public Access Unix, +1 415 969 8238

In article <1993Jan21.132808.13291@icd.ab.com> kowalski@ganymede (Patty Kowalski) writes:
>   Cheryl writes
>
>>    P.S. Some of the reception halls that I have called are already booked 18
>>    months in advance.  I find myself wanting to throw things at the screen 
>>    Adam suggests organizing a big, traditional wedding for Stuart and Gloria
>>    in two months.
>
>		Amen, sister!  I BARELY did it in 10, did not get
>		my "ideals" but had an amazingly wonderful wedding
>		anyway.  When I think of all we did (ALONE, mind
>		you -- we had no Adam to whip things up for us), 
>		I want to put "Organized Wedding" on my resume. 
>		Dont think most men would be impressed, though!
>		Good luck to you!  Do you think it really is any
>		easier for the rich/powerful to get a hall in 2 months??

And, aren't Stuart and Gloria getting married on just about the busiest 
day of all for weddings, on valentine's day (or am I mistaken about the 
date).  And, this year 14 Feb. falls on a weekend day, So, it should
make it all the more impossible to book the services one needs even if one
had 12 months to do it in!!!!
But then, if Erica can walk in high heels with a broken ankle, then Adam
can plan a valentine's day wedding in just 2 months!

Johanne
From: MM_VALLAT@ACAD.FANDM.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: subscribe
Date: 21 Jan 1993 14:40:24 -0600
Organization: Franklin and Marshall College
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

SUBSCRIBE Michele M. Vallat
From: christil@uts.amdahl.com (Christine Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: KL 1/21 spoiler for next week
Date: 22 Jan 93 21:57:17 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

Can someone please email me the spoilers for next week's (1/28) Knot's
Landing?  Somehow in the Bay Area (California), we don't get to see
the previews for the next episode.  

Thanks.
--Christine
christil@uts.amdahl.com

-- 

Christine Lee                           Amdahl Corp. 	
christil@long_island.uts.amdahl.com     Santa Clara, CA   

----------------------------------------------------------
  "Suppose that you were an idiot and suppose you were a 
   member of Congress.  But I repeat myself."
                                            --Mark Twain
----------------------------------------------------------
From: ahelmers@umiami.ir.miami.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Acting Lessons for LB
Date: 27 Jan 93 18:42:23 EST
Organization: Univ of Miami IR

In article <1993Jan20.155418.2348@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, rurfin@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Rural Finance Group) writes:
> IMHO the writers are making Lorraine Bailey into a *mystery* women
> to give her plenty of time for acting lessons.  When we do see her,
> she's either in a lip lock with Jack or just standing there looking
> tall.  Seems they don't want to give her much to do 'til she completes
> remedial facial expressions 101.  Just my opinion.
> 
> Now since I've posted for the first time, (hopefully it will go through),
> let me tell you a bit about myself.
> 
> My name is Lori Karn and I've been lurking since the first of the year.
> I work at the Ohio State University.
> I live with my husband Ron, who also watches, and Kipper-the-dog and
> Abbie-the-cat.

Hi Lori!  You came in with a very astute first-post-observation, IMHO.  Mostly
because I've been thinking the same thing about sweet Lorraine :).  After the
session in Jack's hotel room I immediately lumped her in with the actresses who
play Galen Hendersen and NewNat.  All attractive blondes with absolutely no
*passion*, and very little ability to draw in the viewer.  It makes it very
difficult to understand why Jack is so damned obsessed. I mean, c'mon
counselor.  Surely Pine Valley stocks party dolls in the local adult variety
store...

> BTW, does anyone else envy Julie Barr (Brooke).
> I mean, this woman has had love scenes with MEK, Walt Wiley,
> and the actor who plays Edmund, I've forgotten his name.
> Nice job, huh?

Yep, fer sure!  Edmund is a good example of a character who came on with a
bang--unlike our ice princess trio, he was interesting and I for one found the
character intriguing from the beginning of his run.

Yo Helmers

> AMC
From: daveo@hpcvra.cv.hp.com (Dave Ochs)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 21:20:11 GMT
Subject: Re: AMC:Gloria...yecchhhh....
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, OR, USA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps

>/ hpcvra:rec.arts.tv.soaps / alex@unx.sas.com (Alexandra Bost) /  6:42 pm  Jan 21, 1993 /

>I have been going back to my last year's updates to do the "One Year Ago"
>section of my Wednesday Updates.  And you know what?  Back then, Gloria was
>REALLY, REALLY bad!  I mean, have we forgotten how she followed Dixie and
>Craig to their honeymoon bed?  How she blackmailed Craig (even - horrors! -
>making us feel sorry for him some of the time)?  How she spent Dixie and

Wait a minute ... I NEVER felt sorry for that scum-sucking Craig ... I want
that on the record :-)  At least we don't have anyone that over-acts
(ala' James T Kirk) as bad as Craig anymore [although a few of the actors
UNDER-act].

>Craig's money to buy a car, clothes, apartment, champagne, etc. for
>herself?  Not to mention making the video tape that almost DESTROYED
>Dixie's life!!!

No doubt about it ... she was bad.  I wish she'd turn just a little bad
again.  If they are going to pair her up with Adam I hope she does get
a bit nasty and makes his life a living hell!

>Alex

Dave Ochs            "I just had this image of you ... you were wearing a
daveo@cv.hp.com       sash and shiny gold buttons ... were you ever in a 
Corvallis, OR         marching band?"          "Amnesia" Erica to Dimitri
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps