HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: POOL - Picks for Week #3 (REPOST)
Date: 15 Sep 92 19:25:25 GMT
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder

Week 3
------

PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK THE FORM BEFORE MAILING IT!

Mail this form to davewood@cs.colorado.edu with the word "picks" in the
subject line.  Be sure to choose one and only one team for each game.  Mark
your choice with an 'x' in the appropriate box.  Put your initials after the
word "Initials:" (ON THE SAME LINE!) at the bottom of the form.  If you have
questions about this form, send them with the subject "fbproblem."  If you
still need to sign up, YOU MUST SEND A SEPARATE MESSAGE with the word
"signup" in the subject line.  Do not reply to this message unless it is to
send in your picks.  See the Rules/Signup post for more information.

WEIGHTS: Assign 10 points to 4 different games.
	 Assign  7 points to 5 different games.
	 Assign  5 points to 5 different games.

This form is due at 10 am PST (5 pm GMT) on Sunday, Sep 20.  NO EXCEPTIONS!

DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE!

 WT  Away                       Home
*------------------------------------------------*
[  ] [ ] New Orleans		[ ] Atlanta      
[  ] [ ] San Francisco		[ ] NY Jets    
[  ] [ ] Tampa Bay		[ ] Minnesota      
[  ] [ ] Cincinnati		[ ] Green Bay     
[  ] [ ] Denver			[ ] Philadelphia      
[  ] [ ] Kansas City		[ ] Houston      
[  ] [ ] Seattle		[ ] New England      
[  ] [ ] Detroit		[ ] Washington       
[  ] [ ] LA Rams		[ ] Miami            
[  ] [ ] Phoenix		[ ] Dallas           
[  ] [ ] Cleveland		[ ] LA Raiders     
[  ] [ ] Pittsburgh		[ ] San Diego     
[  ] [ ] Indianapolis		[ ] Buffalo     
[  ] [ ] NY Giants		[ ] Chicago        
                                
Initials: 

DID YOU PUT YOUR INITIALS ON THE SAME LINE AS THE WORD INITIALS???  PLEASE DO!

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Rex Wood -- davewood@cs.colorado.edu -- University of Colorado at Boulder
  BRONCOS!!        R.S.F.P. Internet Football Pool Organizer        BRONCOS!!
                            Owner, Boulder Houlders
From: collins@gdwest.gd.com (Gary J. Collins)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: MNF Announcer Bashing ...
Date: 11 Sep 92 17:20:15 GMT
Organization: General Dynamics Corp.

In article <1992Sep10.032120.25193@europa.asd.contel.com> ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com writes:
>
>Much has been said about the Monday Night trio.  Quite frankly, I feel, IMHO,
>that Al Michaels is one of the more steady play-by-play announcers in the
>business today.  Michaels is quite versatile, as noted by his excellence in
>baseball and Olympic hockey coverage.

	Michaels is good.  He's damn good.  I agree with you on his
	steadiness.  Whatever sport he covers, he always comes off as
	having covered that sport for years.  I also think he's lost
	that stigma of being a Scully sound-a-like.  ("It's
	interesting to note....","AAAAAAAAND just like THAT, an
	err-uh has been CHARGED to Gonzales", etc.)

>
>As far as the rest of the gang, Dan Dierdorf was with CBS prior to moving
>to MNF in 1987.  In fact, Dierdorf was the number two analyst behind John
>Madden in 1986.  He was paired with Dick Stockton that year, and did the
>Redskins-Bears playoff game in Chicago during that season.  On his own, I
>thought he did a good job.


	I'm gonna differ with you on this one.  His Sylvester-
	the-cat-sounding, lumbering, sloppy observations grate
	me all the wrong ways.  He is forever touting that
	whichever team is playing has "pound for pound the
	beth retheiver corp/linebackerth/thafeties/ (pick one) in the NFL.
	I mean he makes everyone the greatest (pound for pound
	that is) every frickin' weak.  A little more
	objectivity would be appreciated.

>However, he has to share the spotlight with Frank Gifford, and there was a
>time when he was not pleased about it.  Personally, taking Gifford out of the
>booth would make a major difference in the flow of the Monday night telecasts.
>Gifford was great in the Cosell and Meredith era, but it's time to pass on the
>baton.
>

	Blast him out of there.  He's old and slippin'.  And
	for all the reasons that have been posted here before.
	I don't think he'll go anywhere, though.  He's in like
	flynn with the producer.  In fact, Chet Forte (former
	director of MNF) says that neither Gifford nor
	Dierdorf are going anywhere soon because they're so
	well liked by the powers that be.  Screw the viewers,
	I guess.  Let's face it -- NO ONE who watches/listens
	to ABC's MNF respects his current perfromances.
	Except Regis and Cathy Lee.
	Lee.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sgoldman@encore.com (Steve Goldman)
Subject: Re: Dolphins News - Clayton placed on IR
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 15:34:13 GMT

paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger) writes:

>In article <1992Sep9.042632.4482@scubed.com> wilkins@scubed.com (Darin Wilkins) writes:
>>In article <1868@ceylon.gte.com> chf0@harvey.gte.com (Curtis Fennell) writes:
>>>According to Saturday's Boston Globe, Mark Clayton was put on injured
>>>reserve and Jim Jensen was resigned.  Clayton has a strained disk (or
>>>something like that) which he also had last year, but played with
>>>anyway.
>>
>>>I hope Clayton isn't out too long - we need him.
>>
>>According to radio reports here (San Diego), it is possibly quite
>>serious and he might miss half the season - or more.  Reportedly
>>he has been sent to a specialist for diagnosis.  The disk problem
>>is in his neck.  Does anyone have more info?

>   Does this mean that Duper and Robert Clark will be the starters? 

  When Clayton was put on IR the stories in paper said Tony Martin
would replace him. They also said that Clayton's neck problem was
not career threatening (he had a similar problem last year). I thought
that he had already gone to the specialist by the time I had left
S. Fla. (Mon.) and that he was expected back as soon as he could
be recalled.


Steve Goldman, Encore Computer Corp          (919) 481-3730
901 Kildaire Farm Rd., bldg D  Cary, NC  27511       USA
internet: sgoldman@encore.com
From: htilney@vax.clarku.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Steeler Schedule...
Date: 6 Sep 92 15:23:26 GMT
Organization: Clark University

Sep 6	at Houston			1pm
Sep 13	NY Jets				4pm
Sep 20	at San Diego			4pm
Sep 27	at Green Bay			4pm
Oct 4	BYE
Oct 11	at Cleveland			1pm
Oct 19	Cincinnati			9pm
Oct 25	at Kansas City		     7:30pm
Nov 1	Houston				1pm
Nov 8	at Buffalo			4pm
Nov 15	Detroit				1pm
Nov 22	Indianapolis			1pm
Nov 29	at Cincinnati			1pm
Dec 6	Seattle				1pm
Dec 13	at Chicago			1pm
Dec 20	Minnesota			1pm
Dec 27	Cleveland			1pm

In terms of last year's winning percentages this is not a very tough schedule,
but you never know. Alot depends on the last six or seven games; in almost all
of them the Steelers should be favored.

-
Bart "Webb" Tilney		|   "All of life is a blur 
Email: htilney@vax.clarku.edu	|    of Republicans and meat!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com (Bob Ashley)
Subject: Quick Start = Super Bowl Win??
Reply-To: ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com
Organization: GTE Federal Systems Division
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 23:25:47 GMT

In article AA01048@cabell.vcu.edu, csc2imd@cabell.vcu.edu (Ian M. Derby) writes:
>Well, according to ESPN, in recent history, teams that have won the
>Superbowl started off at 2-0 ...

I guess it would depend on how long "recent history" is defined ... OK,
let's make this a trivia question ...

When was the last time a Super Bowl winner did NOT start the season
at 2-0 ??


Bob - sooner than some of you might think   :-)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Ashley                        Internet:  Bob.Ashley@oasis.gtefsd.com

Software Engineer, (703)-818-4656  | Winter Leagues 1992-1993
   GTE Federal Systems Division    |    GTE FSD Mixed Secretary: Thu 17:45
   15000 Conference Center Drive   |    Thursday Mixups:         Thu 20:30
   Chantilly, VA   22021-3808      |    NFL Mixed Secretary:     Mon 21:00


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: statesse@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Scott E States)
Subject: Re:players w/ big stats: are they for real?
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 01:44:58 GMT


In article <92254.161654MSB101@psuvm.psu.edu> <MSB101@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> The following players posted big numbers for week one.  But the players in my
> FFL are skeptical about their future potential.  Can anyone in the know  
comment
> on whether these stats were flukes or are these players for real?
> 
> 1) Workman
> 2) Culver

With the way Culver played in the first week I think you'll be seeing a lot  
more of him. This was his first pro game so there is the potential for him to  
be much better.

Scott E. States
statesse@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bonobo@Ingres.COM (David Victor)
Subject: Re: Monday Night Football announcers are terrible
Reply-To: bonobo@Ingres.COM (David Victor)
Organization: Ask Computer Systems Inc., Ingres Division, Alameda CA 94501
Distribution: na,local
Date: 15 Sep 92 23:07:53 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.164306.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu> f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin) writes:
>In article <92253.105427PMONGEAU@MIAMIU.BITNET>, PMONGEAU@MIAMIU.BITNET writes:
>> Turn down the sound and listen to the radio.  Do Buck and Stram still do
>> MMF on radio?
>
>Yes, but they're terrible too. :-(  Buck sounds like a slow-on-the-uptake
>old fart gargling with gravel, and Stram is the worst example of if-I-were-
>still-coaching-I-woulda school of color commentary.  They're so cheesy, it
>makes me ill.

They may be kinda cheesy, but I like 'em.  Buck *is* gravelly, but he's got 
the perfect Monday Night Football voice.  As far as Hank Stram is concerned,
I still think it's pretty amazing how he's able to predict the plays with
remarkable accuracy...

-David Victor
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: burt@summa.tamu.edu (Burt Juarez)
Subject: Tampa Bay Bucs question
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 14:42:00 GMT

There was a player with the Bucs last year named Robert Wilson.  Does anyone
know the status of this player.  Is he on injured reserved or was he cut
from the team?????  I've checked the stats for the 2 previous games, and he
didn't seem to play!   Help.

******************************************************************************
*  Burt J.                              Internet :   burt@rigel.tamu.edu     *
*  Go Aggies!    Gig 'em!               Bitnet :     burt@tamrigel           *
* <Proud TO NOT BE a member of the Bandwagon Bulls fan club>  Go Celtics!    *
******************************************************************************

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: v073pzuy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Hooked On Phonics)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Tony Smith
Date: 10 Sep 92 17:38:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


What's the word on Tony Smith, folks?  I didn't get to see the game, but I did
see that he had 3 rushes for 40 yards.  The Jets' D is pretty tough, IMO, and
since the Falcons *still* do not possess an offensive line (oh, it's 
"offensive," alright, but not what I mean), Smith must have done pretty well...

Reports had it that he suffered a bruised knee--is he the answer the Falcons 
have been seeking at running back?

"Watters will be stuffed."

					---Chet
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jbhuber@iastate.edu (Joseph B Huber)
Subject: Re: Minnesota Vikings wk2 STATS
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:48:12 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.162229.4395@walter.cray.com> jason@cray.com (Jason Parker) writes:
>TEAM
>Minnesota Vikings (1-1)
>
>GAME SUMMARY
>
>          Minnesota  Detroit*
>Rushing   26-95      29-73
>Pass Att  20-36-3    10-15-1
>Pass Yds  175        96
>Fum Lost  1          0
>Poss      31:49      28:11
>Pts       17         31

Ouch. Looks like the Vikes played great defense, and the offense wasn't too
bad, as they outgained the Lions. But....those turnovers really hurt.

Was Gannon throwing poorly, or was the offensive line not giving him
adequate time to pass?

-- 
Joe Huber 
(jbhuber@iastate.edu)        | Capt. James T. Kirk on the 2nd law of thermo: 
Dept. of Mech. Egr.          |  "It's not a hundred percent efficient,
Iowa State University        |   but nothing ever is."
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gogo@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (donald.gogolin)
Subject: Re: Browns News - Sept 8th
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Distribution: bl
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 14:31:28 GMT

In article <1992Sep8.085254.8819@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>, mocnik@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:
> Browns News - Sept 8th
> ----------------------
> 
> Well, the Browns had another Hall-of-Shame performance against the Colts.
> They were out-played, out-coached, and out-manned in this ugly performance.
>
> 1. Bill Belichick and his staff did not prepare the Browns for this game.

This boggles my mind!  They were preparing (supposedly) for the COLTS when
they were blasted by the Vikings.  How can you not be prepared for the first
game of the season????   They were flat, just as they have been all pre-season.
Sunday's game was simply the fifth of 20 pre-season games the Browns will
play this year.  This performance was a total embarrassment to any one
afilliated with the Browns.  This isnt no way is to detract from the Colts.
They came to play football and did.

> 
> 3. Also Eric Metcalf got more playing time than he deserved, because the 
>    Browns were hoping he could grab a quick pass and run it down the field. 
>    The thought was good, but why not use James Brooks. 
>    Metcalf's speed, but he will run straight ahead. 
>    James Brooks did not touch the ball. He sat most of the second half.

This  never makes any sense.  The Browns go out and pay BIG bucks for a 
quality 'aging' player and let him sit.  Joe Morris did little or nothing
for the Browns last year.  Here we go, again!  If Brooks was worth paying
a million dollars for get him in the game and let him do something.  This
guy is a good ball player.  Let him play!

> 6. The Browns recovered the second half kickoff at the Cots 23. The Browns got
>    no closer than the 2, where Stover kicked the only points of the day.

This was the only high light of the game.  the Browns actually moved the ball
on the ground for three straight plays before self destructing at the two.
I did enjoy watching Vardell carry the ball.  If he every gets any blocking 
up front he's going to be impressive.

> 
> 7. Jay Hilgenberg didn't play like a Million Dollar player. He looked confused
>    and out-of-place on most occasions. A center needs time to work with the
>    other lineman and the quarterback. One week is not enough time.
>    A lot of improvement is needed if the Browns are going to win 
>    any games this year.
> 
Enough said!

> 10.Bernie didn't need to spend any time in the hospital.

This is amazing.  I'm surprised he stuck it out.  Next Monday ought to be
interesting if nothing else.
On the basis of what I saw Sunday, the Browns are the worst team in the NFL
right now and may be hard pressed to win 3 games this year.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: Monday Night Football announcers are terrible
Organization: University of Michigan
	<BILLMS.92Sep9110440@z.eecs.umich.edu> <1992Sep09.171206.3657@bnr.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 21:17:17 GMT

In article <1992Sep09.171206.3657@bnr.ca> emilio@crchh444.BNR.CA (Emilio Rivera) writes:

   In article <BILLMS.92Sep9110440@z.eecs.umich.edu>, billms@eecs.umich.edu
   (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
   |>In article <1992Sep09.140343.301@bnr.ca> patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca
   (Patrick Power) writes:
   |>
   |>       The one quote that cracked me up was made by FGifford.  Referring to
   |>   Emmitt's goal of a 2000yd season, he said that a goal of 125 yards per
   |>   CARRY was not unrealistic.  Reality, what a concept!  :)
   |>
   |>quick: name the last team to lose a non-planB free agent.  It may end up
   |>costing Dallas more, but he probably won't even get an offer from another
   |>team.
   |>
	Could you explain what the heck is your point.........

Sure.  It was a mispost.  I meant to follow up to the *next* article.  Guess
you didn't see the note I already sent out.  

On the other hand, its going to be a very long year for you if you reply to
*every* post in this group that doesn't make any sence!

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
From: saji@thor.ece.uc.edu (Sandeep  Aji)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bucs coach
Date: 7 Sep 92 22:24:58 GMT
Organization: Unversity of Cincinnati, ECE Dept
Originator: saji@thor.ece.uc.edu


In article <1992Sep3.205105.9239@wl.com>, wyborsr@wl.com (Russ Wyborski) writes:
|> 
|> Does anyone know who the new coach of Tampa Bay is? Not that it will make
|> a whole lot of difference.
|> 

  Are U kidding ??? Well he is Sam Wyche . (ex-Bengal) coach . The man who
  took a team from a losing season to a super-bowl . I am sure he will take 
  the Bucs to a winning season (their first ??) and also he might save 
  Vinny Testeverde's career.


	Aji



  Go Bengals ... !!!
-- 
  | 	Sandeep A. Aji			| saji@thor.ece.uc.edu      |
  |     University of Cincinnati   	| saji@hagar.ece.uc.edu     |
  |        FINAL FOUR 1992              | 	                    |
  |                                     | 			    |
From: mannk@fshvmfk1.VNET.IBM.COM (Ken Mann)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 14:55:33 EDT
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Player Status: Brooks (WR - IND)
Reply-To: mannk@fshvmfk1.VNET.IBM.COM
Organization: IBM
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: Usenet 3.0

What is Brooks status?  He had no stats on Sunday.  I have not heard
that he is hurt.

 Shalom!  |  INTERNET: mannk@fshvmfk1.vnet.ibm.com            Christ
   Ken    |  VNET:     FSHVMFK1(MANNK)                          is
          |  IBMnet:   mannk@saskatchewan.fishkill.ibm.com    risen!
-----------------------------------------------------------
               You can only coast downhill!
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.pro:15957 rec.sport.football.college:11963
From: bentow@cis.rand.org (Stan Bentow)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: success of colleges in producing pro players?
Date: 9 Sep 92 00:19:43 GMT
Reply-To: bentow@cis.rand.org (Stan Bentow)
Distribution: usa
Organization: RAND, Santa Monica CA

>
>What I can more easily verify is that Stanford, which is not the most 
>dominant team in the Pac-10 by any stretch, has 15 NFL players, not including
>the four drafted in 1992.  These include some of the longest standing players,
>including James Lofton (14 years), Darrin Nelson (10 years), and John Elway (9 years).


I think that in general (ie. over the years), USC has produced more
pro players than any other school although I don't have the figures
at my finger tips.  This goes for recent years as well, although I
think Washington is No. 1 now.

Stan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lej@pdn.paradyne.com (Leo James)
Subject: Re: Bucs coach
Organization: AT&T Paradyne, Largo, Florida
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 16:21:04 GMT

Yeah,  I know for a fact that the "official" NFL stance is that the
1979 Buccaneers is the team that made the expansion-to-playoff team
transition the fastest.
--
+---------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
|Leopold E. James     | "A heart, a soul, AND | AT&T Paradyne         |
|ph: (813) 530-8425   |  a mind are terrible  | P.O. Box 2826, LG-132,|
|lej@pdn.paradyne.com |  things to waste."    | Largo, FL 34649 (USA) |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sckelm@iastate.edu (Steven C Kelm)
Subject: Re: Smith is NOT Sanders
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 18:16:42 GMT

In article <BuBLy4.JFB@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> bubba@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Gary Beason) writes:
>Why is it that when people talk about the cut-back running of Smith,
>they have to compare him to Sanders, who  did NOT invent the damn
>style.  (Anyone remember Sayers or Marcus Allen?)
>
>All in all, it's real tiresome to hear Sanders as some kind of
>measuring stick. 

Truthfully, it is getting very tiresome to read the seemingly endless
supply of posts about "Sanders is the best" or "Thomas is the best"
<insert your favorite football player here>.  It seems rather obvious 
to me, as it should to everyone else, that a running backs success is 
highly dependent on his offensive line.  If you don't agree with this
you are saying that all offensive lines are created equal, something 
which is not true.  His open field running abilities are a factor, 
but you need to get to the open field first.  That is not to say that 
Barry Sanders or Emmit Smith would not excel behind lesser quality lines
but it is safe to say that their overall rushing yardage would decrease.
Has any type of study been carried out where factors such as 'strength'
of offensive line, or 'strength' of opponents defense have been used to 
try to quantify a players performance.

Steven Kelm  sckelm@vincent1.iastate.edu
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Percy Snow?
Date: 14 Sep 92 21:51:28 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Chevron

In article <BuL0EH.8F2@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> thaddeus@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Thaddeus R. Crews) writes:
>In article <1992Sep13.203029.25720@news.iastate.edu> knight@iastate.edu (David P Bonthuis) writes:
>>	Does anyone know whatever happened to Percy Snow?  Is he still with
>>the Chiefs and just not playing?  I know in his rookie year they only
>>played him in obvious run situations because he didn't defense the pass
>>very well.  I can't believe he would be cut.
>>
>>Go CHIEFS!!!!!!
>>
>
>1. Percy Snow is a good run-stuffer, but is lacking in pass defense skill.
>2. The Chiefs are a quality team, but lack a quality wide receiver.
>3. The Redskins have depth at wide receiver, but need a run-stuffing MLB.
>
>SUGGESTION: Percy Snow should be traded to the Redskins for Rickey Sanders!!!
>
>The Redskins and the Chiefs are my two favorite teams, so I am not trying to
>make one team better at the other's expense.  What do the Washington and KC
>fans think about this trade idea?
>-- 
>-- Thad Crews                         (email thaddeus@vuse.vanderbilt.edu)
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>"Some people have a way with words, and some people, ... oh ... *not* have
>a way, I suppose..."  -- Steve Martin

Not too bad. But I am rather impressed with Birden and expected good
things from Barnett this year.  Wishful thinking?

James (Chiefs are second only to you kneaux who) Clyde


-- 
GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!!    | "There once was a deputy named Fife,
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!!!!    |  Who carried a gun and a knife.
James Clyde  LSU '91    |  The gun was all dusty, the knife was all rusty,
  Mayberry Graffiti =>  |  'Cause he never caught a crook in his life."
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.pro:16836 dc.redskins:157
From: wlittle@nmsu.edu (Wes)
Subject: Re: 1992 NFL Predictions
Organization: NMSU Computer Science
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 20:12:30 GMT

Funny how this prediction shows Dallas finishing 4th in the NFC
East..laugh....Try 1st...The Giants are currently being trounced by
Dallas as I type this posting....grin