HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Big 8 woof
Date: 9 Nov 92 19:29:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: mccall.1992Nov9.132952
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


In article <1992Nov9.174448.4677@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>, wilbanks@spot.Colorado.EDU (Wendell Gee) writes:
>Congratulations to Nebraska for their Big 8 championship.
>Too bad that while CU and USC mix it up in the Fiesta Bowl, Kansas and
>Hawaii play a possibly good game in the Aloha Bowl, and OU...um, Weedeater
>Bowl? you poor Huskers will be splattered across the Orange Bowl turf by
>Florida State.

I wouldn't count KU to lose to CU.  By the Relativity Theorem.....
KU beat OU at KU, while CU tied OU at CU.   And KU didn't get thumped
by NU as bad as CU.

>"What happened? We clobbered Kansas. We humiliated Colorado. Why did we 
>get our butts kicked in the Orange Bowl????" 
>Well, 1) Colorado was overranked and 2) Kansas wins the Big 8 title NEXT 
>year and 3) To even think that a Big 8 team can play on the same turf as 
>Florida State right now is ridiculous. 
>
As for next year:
[from Athlon's 2 deep preseason roster]
CU loses
	Off:
	line-Hansen,Perkins,
	WR/TE-Keys
	PK-Blottiaux
	Def:
	line-Elder
	LB-Brown, Biekert
	DB-Figures, Bradford
ISU loses
	Off:
	line-McClish, Armbrust
	RB-Williams
	WR/TE-Spencer
	Def:
	line-Dunlevy, Miller
	LB-Watkins, Milner, Goodwin
	DB-Walker, Buggs, Armstrong, DouBrava
	P-Schnoor
KU loses
	Off:
	line-Marcum,Loneker
	QB-Hilleary
	RB-Cozzens, Douglas, Johnson
	WR/TE-Licursi, Gay
	Def:
	line-Moore, Brown, Stubblefield
	LB-Bailey
	DB-Bowen
KSU loses
	Off:
	line-Kolb, Lawrence, Clayton, Orr
	QB-Garber
	RB-Gallon
	WR/TE-Benton
	Def:
	line-Blackwell, Griffith, Killian, Dabney
	LB-Barta, C.Patterson, Venables
	DB-Masters, G.Patterson
MU loses
	Off:
	line-Crowl, Petrus, Hembrough, Snisky
	RB-Kayhill, Schlef
	WR/TE-Bailey
	PK-Jacke
	Def:
	line-Elliot, Watkins,Burke, Cooper
	LB-Wilkins, Ringgenberg
	DB-Benson
NU loses
	Off:
	line-Zyzda,Scott,Chorney,Shields
	QB-Grant
	RB-Lewis
	WR/TE-Hughes,Hawkins,Washington,Vedral
	Def:
	line-Parrella,Liewer
	LB-Hill,White
	DB-Wilhite,Carmer,Byrd
	P-Stigge
OU loses
	Off:
	line-Moriarty,Watkins,Keith
	QB-Collins
	RB-Brewer,Rasheed
	WR/TE-Mickey,Taylor,Collins
	Def:
	LB-Tippens,Barnes,Hill
	DB-Walker,Carter,Shankle
	P-Carter
OSU loses
	Off:
	line-Hudson,Warner
	WR/TE-Milliner,McCone,Copeland
	Def:
	line-Woolridge,Garmond,Thompson,Williams
	LB-Funchess,Davis,Erving
	DB-Cannon,Henley,Fisher

--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Date: Wednesday, 11 Nov 1992 14:15:32 PST
From: <TOM@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Distribution: usa

See: Rec. Sports. Football. Pro  (The Bet III)!
From: kkc@nursing.arizona.edu (Kee Koon Chua)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami #1
Date: 12 Nov 92 16:56:43 GMT
Reply-To: kkc@nursing.arizona.edu
Organization: University of Arizona - College of Nursing


In article by Myung Joon Choi, he writes:

>    And this year, Washington overtook Miami when Miami barely beat
>Arizona, and only regained it when they beat Florida St. and Penn State
>in consecutive weeks.  Washington (bandwagon) fans jumped all over the
>'Canes for that one, only to see their beloved Huskers get completely
>shut down last weekend.  If things go as planned, Miami will have beaten
>Arizona, Penn State, Florida St., Syracuse, San Diego St., and
>Alabama/Texas A&M.  All this without their version of Steve Emtman in
>Rusty Medeiras.
>

So far, the only real team that Miami has beaten is FSU and Arizona. As
for Penn State, anyone top 25 teams could have beaten them. As for Arizona,
I seriously doubt that Miami can beat them if the game was held in Arizona.
Wahington has a much stronger schedule than Miami for a simple reason: they
are in the PAC 10. Do you think that Miami will still be unbeaten if they were
in the PAC 10? NO!
  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Subject: Re: Nebraska beats Colorado
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Madison
Distribution: usa
Date: 12 Nov 92 12:06:38 CST

In article <skipb.721587069@cwis> skipb@cwis.unomaha.edu (Skip Burrell) writes:
>"Susan R. Wagner" <sw39+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>>Susan Wagner
>>Colorado Buffalo fan in Pittsburgh, PA
>
>>PS. I'm tired of this thread, will someone please find something else to
>>rag on.  The game is history!  We can talk again next year.  I'm hoping
>>the outcome will be different.  GO BUFFS!
>
>I'm with you Susan. Put the past behind us and look forward to some verbal
>sparing next year! (Hopefully it will be done in a less insulting manner) You
>root for your Buffalos, I'll cheer for my Husker's, and lets meet in the
>ski-lodege and toast our love of college football and the joy and pain it
>brings us! :-) (I may not like Colorado football, but I *love* Colorado
>skiing!!) :-) :-)
>
>Next year -> the CU-NU game will determine the National Championship!! ;-)
>
>GO BIG RED!!
>
>--
>Skip Burrell				Internet:	skipb@unomaha.edu
>Comp. Sci. Graduate Student		compuserve: 	76146,2323
>University of Nebraska at Omaha		AOL:		skipb
>My Disclaimer: Any opinion I may have stated was purely unintentional!

Boy, I've seen it all now.  A Nebraska fan sticking up for a Colorado fan.
Life on the net, I guess.  Sigh....
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
From: ables@hal.com (King Ables)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: What happened to OU?
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:58:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: hal.1992Nov10.195834.4519
Distribution: usa
Organization: HaL Computer Systems, Inc.

>> > In article <1992Nov4.112116@trc.amoco.com>, zmed0b@trc.amoco.com (Mike)
>> > writes:
>> > >Probation happened to OU, pal.  Try cutting your scholarships in half
>> > for >several years and see what happens to your team.  It ain't pretty
>> > and OU >probably won't be top-flight for a couple more years.

>> In article <1992Nov6.084806@mccall.com>, scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
>> > So why don't the OU fans understand Gibb's predictament?
>> > Sending a UHaul to his house.  Some support.

> In article <1992Nov9.160839.13446@Arco.COM>, mminihan@inetg1.ARCO.COM
> (Mike Minihan) writes:
>> my clueless OU friends don't understand this. These are people that
>> are losers in everyday life and the only thing that is positive is
>> OU Football, and when they aren't winning, they get upset.

From article <1992Nov10.120118@trc.amoco.com>, by zmed0b@trc.amoco.com (Mike):
> I'm sorry, but, I have to say that you are a complete idiot.  Your accusation
> in reference to Oklahomans is without basis and devoid of any intelligence
> whatsoever.  Clearly, you are a dolt.  Have a nice day.

Speaking of "devoid of any intelligence"...  He made no such accusation.

He accused *his* friends ("my clueless OU friends").  *You* are the one who
jumped to the conclusion that he meant *all* Oklahomans (are we just the
tensiest bit sensitive, maybe, hm? ;-)  ).

I know some Texas fans who fit this same description, but I sure don't assume
it fits all Texas fans.

It's a GAME, for crying out loud, it's supposed to be FUN!
---------------------------------------------------------------
King Ables                    HAL Computer Systems, Inc.
ables@hal.com                 8920 Business Park Dr., Suite 300
+1 512 794 2855               Austin, TX  78759
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug."
				-- Dire Straits & Mary-Chapin Carpenter
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 09:07:24 EST
From: <JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: RE: 'ROUND the BOWL and DOWN the HOLE

In article <1992Nov8.153541.3998@infonode.ingr.com>, harbinjm@infonode.ingr.com
(Mitch Harbin) says:
>
>I seem to remember the phrase 'round the bowl and down the hole on the
>net the last week or so.  Does 31-11 mean anything to you.? Does less
>than 40 yards on the ground mean anything?  Does a BAMA ass kicking mean
>anything to you?
>
>Sorry, I lost my head there for a moment.  But when people use the 'round
>the bowl and down the hole thing is makes us BAMA people crazy, makes us
>want to beat up on somebody, makes us want to make them have the worst
>record in school history.  That phrase sort of pisses us off, if you know
>what I mean.  Please, for LSU's sake, don't do it again.
>
>Have a nice day and ROLL TIDE!!!!!

Hell, if that sort of woofing gets the Tide all fired up, I
may start doing it myself!  :)


Jim Thomas
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Re: Alabama better than Michigan
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 92 21:18:56 GMT
Organization: VMARK Software, Inc.

In article <ASH.92Nov5094318@ulysses.mr.ams.com> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:
>In article <1992Nov04.145017.39699@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>
>   >win them all, then we will talk...".   Michigan is the last team in the
>   >nation to talk about "play somebody".  
>
>Isn't Texas A&M the last team to talk about "play somebody"?
>

Well, you got me there Alan... You just might be right...
In fact, I just looked up their schedule, evaluated it a little, and would
have to agree...  Even their remaining schedule is pretty weak..
(At least Michigan still has Ohio State...)
>
>-Alan Harder
> 
>These opinions are mine.  You can't have them.  Stop, thief!
>
>
>


-- 
David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dianem@boi.hp.com (Diane Mathews)
Subject:  Again again again (NU)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara Division
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 18:25:51 GMT

YYYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I was surprised that Nebraska did so well against Kansas.  I was actually 
expecting a really exciting nail-biter of a game.  Kansas played pretty well
too, but, for a change, My Favorite Team was the one stopping plays in an 
important game.  I'm so happy.
From: bjglenn@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Wesleyan/Williams
Date: 7 Nov 92 22:16:26 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620

Anyone know who won the Williams/Wesleyan football game?

Thanks,

Brian
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: baze@carson.u.washington.edu (Behzad Khamneian)
Subject: Washington's possible forfeitures
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 07:36:15 GMT

  For those of you who don't know, on Thursday, November 12th, the PAC-10
investigation committee, assigned to the investigation of the Billy "Goat"
Hobert case will announce their decision regarding possible forfeitures by
the UW football team.
  Don James felt confident during his interview with Keith Jackson that neither
one of his assistant coaches participated in setting up the loan and that the
team was not in danger of going 0-9 this season.  But, you never know.

If we do go 0-9 on Thursday, I am wearing all black to school on Friday (my
backpack is black too :).  Besides, I have 2 deadly midterms coming up on
Friday and it is also a Friday-the-13th!!  Geez, this is starting to sound
really aweful...

Well, let's hope for the best.

GO DAWGS!!
Nice job Stanford...  blew USC out of the water.

-Behzad
:)

Organization: University Libraries - Technical Service, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 15:26:40 -0500 
From: "Susan R. Wagner" <sw39+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Nebraska beats Colorado
	<kitchel.721403166@manta>
Distribution: usa

In response to RE: Nebraska beats Colorado, Sid writes:

>	Ohhh, but wait:  someone has just given Coach Mac (Colo.
>division) a copy of the Kinsey Report. He is livid, he is outraged. He
>may have to file a protest with the Big8 Commissioner. If Kinsey is
>correct, NU could have had 10% gays on their team. It surely must be
>against the rules to force good, clean, Christian buffies to face evil
>gay ringers out in the pure corn fields. Coach Mac vows revenge and
>prays for righteousness and goodness to triumph......and some good
>recruiting for insurance.

Now this is a good example of relevant, rational, and intelligent talk
about how a football team did or did not play on a particular
day....NOT!   

>						soONEr bred!!!,
>						      --Sid

Now, I started the original thread about the game.  In this posting,
nowhere did I mention anything about anyones personal habits.  Yes, I
did talk trash about Coach Mac's decisions to (1) start Detmer and (2)
replace him with Stewart, but I have a reason, IMO it was a bad
decision.  But is this a personal attack on his religious beliefs or
personal habits, No.  So grow up and at least respond intellegently to
what was not a whiny posting about our loss.  I was the first person to
conceed the beating.  I didn't even give any reasons why NU beat us,
because they just plain beat us (or course I did say why I thought CU
screwed up, but didn't take credit from NU).  SO WHAT!!!!!  The posting
just had thoughts on the game that any person who new anything about
football could understand, agree with or disagree with.  So which part
do you not agree with?  Did you even read the original post?  I'd be
happy to further explain my reasonings and discuss it with you if you
can be rational!  If not, then please don't respond with stupid,
irrelevant postings such as the one I just read!  Thank you.

Susan Wagner
Colorado Buffalo fan in Pittsburgh, PA



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rszczerb@okeefe.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Subject: Re: ND/PSU--third time's a charm?
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 17:42:19 GMT

There's only one thing I can say for certain about the Penn St./Irish
matchup this weekend ... the two teams with the best uniforms in
college football will be on the field.



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: zcjm0f@wwnv45.uucp (CJohn Mace)
Subject: Re: Open Question to Miami fans
Keywords: n
Organization: Amoco Production
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:07:11 GMT

>
>I'd like to hear some opinions from loyal Canes fans out there. 
>
>If Alabama stumbles and the rest of the top ten remains the same, do
>you think the Mighty Canes will play an undefeated Texas A&M team
>in the Cotton Bowl or, "chicken out" and play a once beaten Cornhusker
>team in their home stadium?
>
>		- inquiring minds want to know
>
>			rob
>
>
As far as the Cotton Bowl is concerned, they are in a win-win situation
if A&M stays undefeated.  If Alabama drops one, then they will try for
Miami, otherwise, look for them to go for Notre Dame and the tv ratings
with the second Bowl Coalition pick.

but putting that aside, A&M is most likely in a lose-lose situation...
If Notre Dame comes to the Cotton Bowl, forget almost any chance for 
a national title.  (unless we beat them like we did in Jan 1988), 
but we would need a lot of help with a sloppy Sugar Bowl.  Otherwise, if
Miami comes, and we manage to beat them (not entirely out of the question,
no matter what you guys think you know. no one knows until you line up
on the field), we will be criticized for a weak schedule, and on and on
and on.  If we lose that game, they will just say we weren't supposed to
be there.  So that leaves one solution...  drop the game to TCU...  :-)

cmuck

po- (personal opinion)  Nebraska and Arizona are playing the best football
    in the country right now... too bad we don't have a playoff so that
    Az would have a chance for the title...
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com (David Head)
Subject:  Re: The Eagles have landed
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 13:27:52 GMT
Reply-To: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne  FL


>The Noles(Ugh!) are gonna kick themseleves outta Florida & it will be
>Miami's turn in the sugar bowl, that is if they don't chicken out again.


Yeah, right, keep dreaming Gators.  Maybe we Noles can't knock you out of
the Sugar Bowl, but we sure can knock you out!  You all had a better team
last year, had a demoralized Florida State team in Gatorville, and still 
could only beat us by 5 points.  Well, we're not demoralized this year!
It's gonna be ugly in Tallahassee.  We get two weeks to rest up and prepare
for you and you all have to sweat over Vanderbilt the week before just to
keep your conference hopes alive.


>A damn proud UF (The only real University in Florida) Alumni
>
>Go Gators....

UF, didn't we decide several years back that UF stood for the University
of Felons?  The NCAA sure did think so!  By the way, around the same time
that UF was languishing in the NCAA dungeon, "someone" set the NCAA after
FSU too.  We were THOROUGHLY investigated and, surprise!, found to be clean!

GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!!


D. Head
From: heidenre@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Todd Heidenreich)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: PENN STATE'S POOR OUTING
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:48:28 GMT
Article-I.D.: oasys.27362
Reply-To: heidenre@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Todd Heidenreich)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD

In rec.sport.football.college, KRB104@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>   Typical PSU fan.  Why don't they realize that PSU is overrated this year,
>because of a lack of a quality qb!  BYU beat PSU in every phase of the game,
>and yet PSU fans want to say that they are better.  Right, and Colorado is
>better than Nebraska.  Penn State has their wins over one legitimate team
>(West Virginia) and five has-beens or never wasses (Eastern Michigan -ha ha,
>Maryland, Rutgers, Temple - ha ha, and Cincinnati - if you recall PSU fans,
>this was really close also).  They have lost to three good teams (Miami, BC,
>and BYU).  So, PSU deserves to be thought of as a 2nd tier team this season.
>WAke up and smell the coffee Happy Valley, you are mediocre this season!

Not all Penn State fans are conceited enough to spend all of our time
woofing for no reason.  Lord knows there are enough of them around wasting
everyone's time.  I can accept that Penn State is (was - :)) overrated
in the polls this year.  However, I can enjoy the fact that I can look
forward to having a very competitive team to root for each season.
Occasionally, Penn State has an off year.  This just makes all the rest
of the years that much better.

Having all of my family come from Michigan, I am looking forward to
Penn State joining the Big Ten next year.  Finally, I might be able
to see more of the Penn State games on TV.

Comments welcome (Flames ignored),
Todd

*****************************************************************
Todd R. Heidenreich     Code 1261      301-227-1176
Internet: heidenre@oasys.dt.navy.mil
David Taylor Model Basin, Carderock Division HQ, NSWC
"Sometimes your the windshield; Sometimes your the bug" DS
*****************************************************************
Organization: University Libraries - Technical Service, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Date: Thu,  5 Nov 1992 08:39:28 -0500 
From: "Susan R. Wagner" <sw39+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Nebraska and patsies -- C U later
	<1992Nov4.122013@mccall.com>

 
>***Note: that KSU and NU are on the same plane to Toyko.****
>--
>Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
>(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
>(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA

Oh won't that be fun!

Susan

PS when is this game?
From: n9041679@henson.cc.wwu.edu (brian h. harper)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami #1
Date: 13 Nov 92 15:51:46 GMT
Organization: Western Washington University

William Karamo Motley <wm1o+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

>In an article <1992Nov12.165643.16101@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
>kkc@nursing.arizona.edu (Kee Koon Chua) writes:

>>So far, the only real team that Miami has beaten is FSU and Arizona. As
>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^                                 ^^^^^^^

>First of all, I AM NOT A MIAMI HURRICANE FAN!!!!!! Got it? Good!
>But, wait a minute, I don't get this.  After Miami's win over Arizona,
>every UW fan in the nation was calling Arizona a "creampuff",
>"overrated", "fluke", "a non-contender", "the weakest PAC-10 team". 
>Could it now be that UW fans are hyping up Arizona to make their Huskies
>look good?

>I don't know.  You tell me.

OK, I will. First of all, not every UW fan was calling Arizona a "creampuff"
team. Anyone who knows the Pac-10 knew Arizona was good. I don't think
they're the best, but very good. The point people were trying to make was
that Miami BARELY won, and when comparing 2 undefeated teams, barely winning
just doesn't cut it. If Maimi's wins over ANY of their ranked opponents was
convincing, then we'd have another story. As it is, I don't think it'll
matter on Jan. 2. I said a couple months ago I didn't think either
Washington or Miami looks as good as they did last year. It is not at all
unlikely that Miami could lose still. Either Syracuse or their bowl
match-up. Alabama and Texas A&M have as good a shot as anybody. Besides, we
don't need to "hype up" Arizona, everyone knows they are a great team now.
And the Huskies don't need to be made to look good. They are good. Maybe not
the best, certainly they don't have the best record. But they're a dam good
football team.

-Brian Harper


>Will         
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfrederi@encore.com (Justin Frederich)
Subject: Re: Will the Hurricanes chicken out?
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 18:44:09 GMT

jsosa@encore.com (Joe Sosa) writes:

>I don't think Alabama will be undefeated, cause I think the Gators
>will beat them in the SEC Championship game.

>So, that leaves, undefeated Texas A&M and undefeated, but once-tied Michigan.

>If Michigan continues to be ranked ahead of Texas A&M going into the bowls,
>then the Hurricanes will have their option of which bowl to go to.

>They will be able to choose:
>The best matchup:
>	#3 Texas A&M vs #1 Miami in the Cotton Bowl
>or the "Mama, told me to stay home" chicken matchup:
>	#7 Nebraska (10-1) vs #1 Miami in the Orange Bowl

>What will Miami do?  Do what's best and play the higher ranked team,
>or go for the bucks, the home field advantage and chicken out staying
>home for Nebraska?

>Joe Sosa

Well welcome back Joe - it's been kinda quiet from you Gaters since the 2 early
losses. I see that your usual whoofing has started again. It looks like the
same old story of getting in your licks before the games when you feel in your
hearts that you will lose. 

I'll tell you right now that I feel in my heart(if I have one) that you will
first lose to Florida St. and then to Alabama .  whoof whoof whoof

So all the rest of your crap is just that. We Cane fans don't need to carry
on for a month before Bowl pickem day because we are certain that the Canes
will go to the Sugar Bowl to decide the MNC. Canes #1 vs Alabama #2 what
could possibly be sweeter ???

Justin Frederich