HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cyc@z.eecs.umich.edu (Yi-Chieh Chang)
Subject: Re: F-16's fear?
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 14:52:48 GMT

>
>>But, do you know that PRC refused to pay back ROC's war debt borrowed from
>>the USA during the Civil war at 1949 ?
>
>No matter what, most countries and the UN acknoledge that PRC is the
>legal seccesor of ROC.
>

Totally wrong. CCP won and KMT lost China thats it. Did any rule said that
a loser must give up everything he owned to the winner ?
What a loser lost is lost what he didn't lose still belonged to him.
KMT have lost the mainland China its a fact and nothing to argue about it,
but Taiwan is still on ROC's hand, unless CCP come to get it, it will
always belong to ROC. Dont you understand this simple fact.

A loser only lost a game not his whole life and everything, don't you 
think so ?

Yi-Chieh
Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:25053 soc.culture.taiwan:12999 soc.culture.hongkong:10564
From: liqiang@kramden.nyu.edu (Li)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: News readers from ROT(Re: Hello from news reader in China)
Date: 8 Sep 92 15:56:43 GMT
Organization: New York University

ghe@nyx.cs.du.edu (George He) writes:

>I hope CCP crash without bringing China  major dissorder as soon as possible.
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 

My opinion: it doesn't seem likely. I think China is on the right track now.
No form of democracy is going to sustain without the support of a middle
class. This middle class is being produced by economic growth.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: jzhang@sdcc3.UCSD.EDU
Subject: Meeting Professor Wen Yuankai at Pasadena
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 00:24:43 GMT

A few of us visited Professor Wen Yuankai at Pasadena, who came to 
California Institute of Technology for research in molecular modeling
about two weeks ago. Professor Wen is planning to work there for about 
six months or longer. He appreciates the help from USTC alumni 
for petitioning to USTC and the State Education Commission on
his behalf.

When asked about his impression of the general situation at home, 
he said that the economic reform in China this year is presenting
a golden opportunity, driven by an economic boom unprecedent in the 
last ten years. He believes that Chinese intellectuals should participate
more in business development, to accumulate economic strengths and 
resources, rather than indulge in "empty talks (Qing1 Tan2)".  
About the prospect of political reform, he emphasizes a long-term view.
He speaks highly of the significance that a few well-known China-based
scholars such as Yu Haocheng and Guo Luoji have joined the overseas
organization "Human Rights in China", which implies a low-profile,
but de facto and legitimate, presence of dissident organization in China.  

Professor Wen is planning to give a talk about business opportunity in
China at the upcoming opening ceremony of the California Chapter of 
Association of Chinese Professionals, to be held in Santa Barbara, 
September 26-27.

Zhenqin Li
jzhang@sdcc3.ucsd.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: cyc@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Yi-Chieh Chang)
Subject: Re: Who Cares 150 F-16s.
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 19:21:14 GMT

>This whole thing about the sale of fighters to Taiwan is so stupid. It
>is another example of foreigners taking advantage of the division
>among Chinese. You see, it is obvious that it is very unlikely that Mainland
>will invade Taiwan. Even if the Mainland does invade Taiwan, it would
>be a piece of cake to do so. Adding a few planes to its airforce won't 
>help too much in Taiwan's defense against Mainland. The Taiwan government
>simply has too much money. Instead of using the money to help other Chinese,

You should tell American and Japanese about your idea, both countries spend
100 billions dollars on military. If one cannot defend itself, whatever he
got may not last long. Taiwan is secured by the trend of the whole world not
by Taiwanese only. Without the intervening from U.S., CCP can take over
Taiwan 20 or may be 30 years ago. But, the point is that this world now
recognize that it is important to help each individual to choose the life
he likes and nobody should take away this fundamental right out of every
individual, no exception. That's what keeps Taiwan safe from CCP's attack.
However, the response from U.S. and U.N. may not be as fast as the
aggressive country, so Taiwan only need to protect themselves long enough 
until U.S. or U.N. comes in and kick CCP's ass.
I would say 6 months to 1 year will do it.

Yi-Chieh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: falk2@seas.gwu.edu (James Falk)
Subject: test, please ignore
Organization: George Washington University
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 10:36:21 GMT

This is a test.  Please ignore ... thanks



Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
From: yang-allan@CS.YALE.EDU (J. Allan Yang)
Subject: Re: Who Cares 150 F-16s.
Organization: Dept of CS, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-2158
	<1992Sep10.063228.27583@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
	<1992Sep10.154925.1543@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
	<10SEP199216172457@deimos.ucc.umass.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 19:30:29 GMT

 > From: s9874194@deimos.ucc.umass.edu (s9874194)
 > Sender: usenet@nic.umass.edu (USENET News System)
 > References: <BuCEr5.JB9@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <1992Sep10.063228.27583@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1992Sep10.154925.1543@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
 > Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 20:17:00 GMT
 > 
 > ....
 > ==========================================================================
 > Treaty is something between two governments with full sovereignty.
 > How many people in this WORLD still think that Taipei is a legitimate
 > and sovereign government? If not, how can one sign a tready with it?
 > Not to mention Beijing!!!!!
 > c.q.
 > ========================================================================
 > ....

If you deny 19 millions people in Taiwan the basic right to keep
their hard-earned prosperity and democracy from being taken over by
an oppressive regime in Beijing, you should also deny each and every
single overseas Chinese student (which I suppose you are one of
them) the right to stay abroad and condemn them to "unite" with
China. And so you should BE RETURNED to China!

Your kind of arrogant mainland chauvinist mentality really invokes
my utmost dislike! It shows not even the least bit of respect to a
huge group of people's right to decide their own fate peacefully and
civilizedly.

You, and those oppressive and aggressive Beijing politicians, can
make whatever claim you want over Taiwan before you are drowned by
the uprising peaceful democratic force. Thank God, it is a FACT that
Taiwan is independent from the the disastrous control of Beijing
that failed Chinese so miserably. People in Taiwan are willing to
fight at all cost to keep it this way.

Don't you think developing the vast and resourceful China, both
economically and politically, is a much more important thing to do
than bickering over who controls Taiwan? People in Taiwan are more
than willing to help out China's development because it is so
mutually beneficial. We are not, and need not to be, adversaries.

Please respect the right of people in Taiwan to choose the system
that they would like to live in, just like you would like others to
respect your choice to stay abroad and not be forced to return to
China against your will.

- Allan
From: hh00+@andrew.cmu.edu (Hongtao Han)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Attorney at law available
Date: 7 Sep 92 17:28:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.wef076200WBMA4E1Fp
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Vivienne Hsu takes pleasure in announcing the commencement of her practice at

Gulf Tower, 18th Floor, Grant Street and 7th Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15211
Telephone: (412) 562-8704, Fax: (412) 562-8713

to handle

. Immigration & Naturalization Cases
. Labor Certification Application
. Permanent Residence Application
. H1 Visa & L1 Visa
. All other non-immigrant visas
. Corporate & Commercial Matters
. Incorporation
. Purchase & Sale of Restaurant & Business
. Partnership Agreement
. Lease Agreement


Fluent in English, Mandarin, and Cantonese
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: yangze@acf3.NYU.EDU (Ze Yang, , , )
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: F-16's fear?
Date: 7 Sep 92 18:28:00 GMT
Organization: New York University

cyc@z.eecs.umich.edu (Yi-Chieh Chang) writes:

>Taiwan was returned to ROC not CCP then. I don't think CCP can claim back
>the territory lost to USSR in Ching dynasty just because it represents

PRC is the legal sucessor of ROC. As regards other lost territory, they
have treaty with the Chinese government.

>Yi-Chieh

Ze Yang
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: x0y3510@tamuts.tamu.edu (Xuejun Yang)
Subject: Re: Insensitive mainland chauvinist view. (Was: Who Cares 150 F-16s.)
Organization: ~/lib/organization
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 21:50:13 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.165717.22137@ms.uky.edu> gang@ms.uky.edu (Gang Li) writes:
>usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns) writes:
>
>>As long as you believe most people are not fool, then let them choose future  
>>for themselves. If the majority of the not-fool-people choose to leave, do you  
>	The logic problem here is the majority of what, should the majority
>	of the country follow the majority of a province? Let history
>	decide whether a country should exist, we have the right to select
>	not sufferring, if we are the majority. As whether people are fool
>	or not which depends on your standard.
>>see there is a very very serious problem in China. If it were so (I doubt it  
>>seriously), then there would be no need for a country call China exit in the  
>>world.
>
>>Carl

This Carl is a fundamentalist. He uses extremely simple logic to solve
this complex problem. He lives in a fantacy world, not seen what the
reality is? He is very childish.
From: shi6@chaos.uchicago.edu (Sheldon Shi)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: F-16's fear?
Date: 9 Sep 92 14:46:56 GMT
Organization: University of Chicago

In article <BuAHwL.86q@acsu.buffalo.edu> v999qx29@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu writes:
>In article <65500110@acf3.NYU.EDU>, yangze@acf3.NYU.EDU (Ze Yang, , , ) writes...
>> 
>>Only a small pecentage of people think there is such a thing called
>>ROC, all others think of GMD as a rebel group, but they have control
>>over Taiwan, just like Philipine Communist gurrillas have controls
>>over part of that country.
>> 
>> 
>>Ze Yang
>
>Are you a communist?

Does that matter? It only reminds me of the top ten "thing" in SCC:
....
1. You communist running dog!

Sheldon
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: zhuh@athena.mit.edu (Hui Zhu)
Subject: Re: WHAT REAL TIBETANS THINK?
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 21:29:05 GMT

In article <0002@tia.lhasa.tb>, Real_Tibetans@tia.lhasa.tb writes:
|> In article 86472 from zhuh@athena.mit.edu (Hui Zhu):
|>  
|> >Hi, you, faked-tibetan, listen:
|> >
|> >whoever you are, whatever your name is. I don't care. :)
|> >
|> >But by posting from a faked "Real_Tibetans@tia.lhasa.tb" won't qualify you
|> >as a real Tibetan, and what you said is therefore NONSENSE.  :)
|>  
|>  
|> Do you think the UPI report is nonsense?  It comes from a recent issue of 
|> China News Digest.
|>  
|> Tibetans want independence!   China out!
|>  
|>  
|> A committee of real Tibetans.

1st. UPI does/did make false report. VOA is another big liar.

2nd, whoever you are, as long as you still fool around with a faked account
andd fake name, whatever you said is worthless.  Your cheating action
can only show the so-called " A committee of real Tibetans " is simply
"A committee of faked Tibetans". :) Simple like that.
Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:25299 soc.culture.taiwan:13163
From: xzh@eddy.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Xiang Zhou)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
Subject: Re: Insensitive mainland chauvinist view. (Was: Who Cares 150 F-16s.)
Date: 11 Sep 1992 15:10:11 GMT
Organization: Brown University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: eddy.cfm.brown.edu

In article <1992Sep11.133443.5656@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, ghe@nyx.cs.du.edu (George He) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep10.221622.10037@cs.yale.edu> yang-allan@CS.YALE.EDU (J. Allan Yang) writes:
|> >
|> > > From: s9874194@deimos.ucc.umass.edu (s9874194)
|> > > Sender: usenet@nic.umass.edu (USENET News System)
|> > > References: <BuCEr5.JB9@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
|> > > .....
|> > > 1. Selling weapons to Taiwan is an invasion to Beijing's
|> > > sovereignty. After all, Washington recognized that Beijing
|> >
|> >This is a very insensitive mainland chauvinist view. And I don't use
|> >these words lightly.
|> >
|> > > 2. If the door for weapon sale is open, then, French can sell
|> > > ......
|> > > attractive price and the Straight will be a very dangerous 
|> > > place.
|> >
|> >Wrong! Taiwan has much much more to lose than mainland from an
|> >unstable Straight. Nothing says more than the fact that nowadays
|> >many Taiwanese students willingly return to Taiwan after their study
|> >in the US. How many Chinese students willingly go back to China
|> >these days? 
|> 
|> I want to add one point. This big China chauvinism pig 
|> can not  tell the difference between defence and offence.
|> 

    You better clean your mouth ! Since you have more money to buy
food, you may have more fat on uour body !

|> Weapons in Taiwaneses'  hands are for defence.
|> Weapons in mainlanders' hands are for offence.
|> 
|> To sell weapons to Taiwan is to increase the stability of the Strait.
|> 
|> If mainlanders don't want to invade Taiwan, why should they worry 
|> about this F-16 sale?
|> 

    F-16 is an OFFENCE weapon !! Don't you know anything at all ?

|> My dear fellow Taiwanese, prepare yourself  for the worst.
|> I don't how many mainlanders share the same view as this blood thirsty
|> chauvinism pig. As long as these pigs are there, we have to fight them
|> whether we get united or independent, because the only thing these pigs
|> want is to suck up our hard-earned prosperity.
|> 
    Why are you so eager to fight ? Can you win ? If you have any respect
to youself, STOP calling other people pigs. We are all Chinese and human beings,
insulting others just like insulting yourself !!
|>
From: cqu@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Chang-ning Qu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 150 F-16 to Taiwan
Date: 5 Sep 92 21:39:13 GMT
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio

In article <1992Sep5.200857.7460@zip.eecs.umich.edu> cyc@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Yi-Chieh Chang) writes:
>>I don't think $90b can buy a win of war. How many people in the world

>If Taiwanese really get serious about defending their own future, we are
>talking about $1000 billions here. $90 billions is the trade surplus,
>it's only hair out of 9 cows. Kuwait is rich, but Taiwan's wealth can buy 
>10 times of Kuwait's oil, do you know that ? As long as Taiwanese can make
>Taiwan become an international interest to do business and make profit. 
>I doubt any of those countries will let any other aggressive country to
>destroy their business opportunity. 
>
>Yi-Chieh

    You mean you need other countries to protect you?
Have you got to know more than 40 years ago. Mr. Chiang's
KMT ever was protected by someone(no polititcal, just fact)
and still defeated to retreat to your today's "ROT".
Remember history, nobody will really protect you.
 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: bbs@medsys.rn.com (Public BBS System)
Subject: Re: Anaonymous mail(DengXPing@beijing.china.etc)
Reply-To: bbs@medsys.UUCP (Public BBS System)
Organization: Med-Systems, Kingsport, Tennessee
Date: 05 Sep 1992 13:37:17 GMT

In article <Btuwn6.91q@news.udel.edu> jianhua@chester.cms.udel.edu writes:
>Can you post an anaonymous message that you can get replies from readers by your anaonymous adress?
>

According the experience on the SCT's anonymous war, the answer is yes.
If one person uses the script to post an anonymous article, he can get
reply if people use "r" to reply to the article.

Chou1
From: kwee@oracle.uucp (Karl Wee)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: a piece of un-confirmed good news
Date: 10 Sep 92 18:32:02 GMT
Organization: Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores CA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
              at Oracle Corporation.  The opinions expressed are those
              of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.

In article <2AA7E193.10397@news.service.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Mr Shannon Yeh) writes:
>From an un-confirmable news source, someone in Beijing is heavily sick.  
>This very possible death may bring the sick Have-Milk-Is-Mother philosophy 
>to the end.
>
>_\_  ------  ---  \   ------   __\__ /---      /___     __\_/__
>  |   /|    __|__|_   |----|    |--  /---      |--|    |-|---|--
>  |  / | \    |/ |    |--|-     | | ---|---    |--|    |_-____-_|
>  /\________ /|   \|  |/  \|    /\|    /\      |__|   ------|-----
>							  \\|
>
>shannon
>-------

This sounds very strange.  If you know who this "someone" is, why don't you
say so?  I know you probably mean Deng, but why this "open secrecy"?

Also, who have the Have-Milk-Is-Mother philosophy?  Is this another double
talk of yours?  What's the purpose of this double talk?  To show that you
have some inside connections to the CCP?
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
From: shi6@chaos.uchicago.edu (Sheldon Shi)
Subject: Re: 150 F-16 to Taiwan
Organization: University of Chicago
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 21:20:03 GMT

In article <laggheINNr2v@nada.cs.utexas.edu> s245@cs.utexas.edu (Spring Class Account) writes:
>Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
>Subject: Re: 150 F-16 to Taiwan
>Summary: 
>Expires: 
>References: <65500087@acf3.NYU.EDU> <1992Sep5.024735.20710@unixg.ubc.ca> <1992Sep5.035350.18711@zip.eecs.umich.edu>
>Sender: 
>Followup-To: 
>Distribution: 
>Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
>Keywords: 
>>
>>Well, probably not too much. But it is only the beginning, isn't it ?
>>The total cost of 150 F-16s is about $4 billions, it is not a big deal based on
>>Taiwan's trade surplus, its about $90 billions now.
>>
>>Yi-Chieh
>
>Looks like we have a warmonger here; however, I don't believe most people
>
>in Taiwan would like to spend too much money on arms.
>---------------------------------
>
>Can the sale actually go through?   
>
>The sale of F-16s will certainly lead to serious consequencies in Sino-US 
>
>diplomatic relations.  
>
>China will cancel its $6b airplane order with the US.
>
>Also, it is very likely that China will risk its entire trade relationship
>with the US.  
>
>Given the huge ammount of Chinese exports through HK, it seems HK will 
>be the most to suffer in a trade war.
>
>The Chinese govn has consistantly retaliated against all countries which
>
>sold  arms to Taiwan.
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>It seems the sale is neither politically nor economically beneficial to the
>
>US, maybe it is another "READ MY LIPS".  
>
>After all, the actual sale will come after the presidential elec.
From: wa2ise@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (robert.f.casey)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: better ways to post "test"s
Keywords: test
Date: 15 Sep 92 03:04:51 GMT
Organization: AT&T

I've noticed a number of "test" articles.  Please note that there is a
misc.test newsgroup for testing.  
Or you could spend a little more time and disguise your test by writing
an article that looks like the other ones in the group on some common
topic.  Just make it short.  
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns)
Subject: Re: Insensitive mainland chauvinist view. (Was: Who Cares 150 F-16s.)
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 14:02:47 GMT

In article <79639@ut-emx.uucp> joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang) writes:
> In article <1992Sep11.154353.2277@news.acns.nwu.edu> usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu  
(Usenet on news.acns) writes:
> >I quite agree with you. If I had power to curse people to death, 
> >I would curse hundreds and thousands of times those evil-minded people 
> >who promote wars.
> 
> Do you not see the contradiction in the statement you just made?

Please enlight me. (In your opinion, people who love peace could not hate  
Hitler, right?)

Carl
Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:25482 soc.culture.taiwan:13296
From: joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
Subject: Re: Who Cares 150 F-16s.
Date: 14 Sep 92 00:35:38 GMT
Followup-To: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
Organization: McDonald Observatory, University of Texas @ Austin

In article <1992Sep11.174825.20736@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> jqtan@northstar60 (Jian-Qi Tan) writes:
>Taiwanese government's feeling of insecurity is a result of its own ambition
>to rule the whole China someday.  

Taiwan's government's feeling of insecurity is a result of things like
TAM which reduces trust in the Mainland government.  What the ROC is
afraid of is that the PRC will over time have an overwhelming military
superiority and some idiotic leader who wants to use it.

The F-16's are "just in case."  I don't see any reason to be overly
concerned about them.  (Yes, I know that the United States violated
its 1982 agreements, but don't trust politicians too much.)

>Why can't Taiwanese government accept the fact that it doesn't have any
>real foreign politicy and it is only a provincial power.

Because people in Taiwan are scared to death about being ruled by a
"national" power that consists of mostly the CCP.

>This realization
>is a good starting point of any meaningful talk.

I don't think that any meaningful Mainland-Taiwan dialog is possible
in this decade.  How can the CCP be trusted in tolerating a
non-Communist government in Taiwan, if it has serious problems
tolerating non-Communists on the Mainland?  For there to be meaningful
Mainland-Taiwan dialog there have to be some fundamental shifts in the
political system on the Mainland.  




Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 150 F-16 to Taiwan
From: Tao Yao <TAYAO@MTUS5.BITNET>
Date: Saturday, 5 Sep 1992 13:20:48 EST
 <65500087@acf3.NYU.EDU><1992Sep5.024735.20710@unixg.ubc.ca><1992Sep5.035350.18711@zip.eecs.umich.edu>
Organization: Computing Technology Services, Michigan Technological Univ.

I don't think $90b can buy a win of war. How many people in the world
are sharing your TI's dream? You may think *MAYBE* USA will support you,
but remember, there is no long-live-friendship between countries, the only
thing is long-live-interests, right? don't count on the *MAYBE* support in a
war.
Kuwait is rich, right? but she can do nothing if USA don't help
Kuwait drive Iraq away. A huge country DO means something in a war if both
side can use similar arms.
From: unregistered@newcastle.ac.uk (Fignatius Fink@Thunderbull)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: International Award for Shen Tong
Date: 15 Sep 92 13:30:39 GMT
Followup-To: soc.culture.china
Organization: IFPCM

Dearly beloved netters, 
   
We are celebrating the Autumn festival this year with a petition for that
celebrated idiot Shen Tong. We call on all members of SCC to sign the 
petition below to honour our fellow moron, Shen Tong. Shen Tong the dunce,
Shen Tong the numbskull, Shen Tong the pompous democrazee fighter. Shen
Tong
in an act of sheer lunacy unmatched in history has made us morons damn
proud.
A toast to brother Shen Tong!

Fignatius Fink

Secretary




To President Bush,
White House
Washington D.C.

To Deng Xiao Ping
Zhongnanhai
Beijing

To Prime Minister John Major
10 Downing Street
London

To B B Ghali
United Nations
New York
New York

We, the undersigned, celebrate the renaissance of Chinese idiocy as
exemplified by our great brother, Shen Tong. Free Shen Tong now!
Morons unite! Democrazees rule!



Name:

Email Address:



INTERNATIONAL FEDRATION FOR THE PROMOTION OF CHINESE MORONS

Fignatius Fink

Secretary
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan
From: yhan@ee.tamu.edu (Yong Han)
Subject: test
Summary: test
Organization: Texas A&M University
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 18:23:54 GMT

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china