HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 13:17:05 EST
From:         Jack Fairservice <JFAIRSER@VDH.BITNET>
Subject:      ldbase questions

I have two questions -

Question 1. VMSECURE time out feature (VMWREM), uses iucv communications.
When this is in place ldbase will not function. I think that both
programs are trying to get the same address. I have to turn off the
VMSECURE timeout feature to use LDBASE. Has anybody seen this problem and
have a solution that does not involve turning off the VMSECURE timeout
feature.


Question 2. In using ldbase, I was trying to use "sounds like" to look
for text in the body of the mail, but it appears that I can only look
at the fields (ie subjects). I would like to say

select * in LSTSRV where body sounds like somthing
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: lstsrv-l@rutvm1
X-VMS-To: IN%"lstsrv-l@rutvm1"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 14:40:00 EDT
From:         Nollaig MacKenzie <GL250011@YUORION.BITNET>
Subject:      "You are not allowed to use inter-server DISTRIBUTE control
              keywords..."

Greetings,

        Can anyone enlighten me about the following?
Thanks, N.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:   BITNET%"LISTSERV@USACHVM1.BITNET"      "Revised List Processor" 15-DEC-1
   992 13:24:31.38
To:     GL250011@YUORION.BITNET
CC:
Subj:   Output of job "PHILOSOP" from NVAS@USACHVM1

Received: From USACHVM1(MAILER) by YUORION with Jnet id 0763
          for GL250011@YUORION; Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:24 EDT
Received: from USACHVM1.BITNET by USACHVM1.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id
 2006; Tue, 15 Dec 92 12:46:42 SEC
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 12:46:39 -0500
From:         Revised List Processor (1.7e) <LISTSERV@USACHVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Output of job "PHILOSOP" from NVAS@USACHVM1
To:           GL250011@YUORION.BITNET

Command replies from NVAS@USACHVM1 are being forwarded to you.

You are not allowed to use inter-server DISTRIBUTE control keywords. Your
job (2400) has been transferred to the postmaster.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <ERIC@SEARN.SUNET.SE>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 19:24:24 +0100
From:         Eric Thomas <ERIC@SEARN.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: ldbase questions
              16 Dec 1992 13:17:05 EST from "Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7"
              <LSTSRV-L@SEARN>

On Wed, 16 Dec 1992 13:17:05 EST Jack Fairservice <JFAIRSER@VDH> said:

>Question 2. In using  ldbase, I was trying to use  "sounds like" to look
>for text in the body of the mail, but it appears that I can only look at
>the fields (ie subjects). I would like to say
>
>select * in LSTSRV where body sounds like somthing

If that  were possible,  I suspect  you'd hit something  like 75%  of the
items (because  when the reference string  contains a single word,  it is
iterated over all the words in the message - otherwise you'd get no hit).
Phonetic searches are only meaningful when done on small amounts of data.
An entire  mail message does  not sound like  anything at all,  there are
just  too many  words. Furthermore  it contains  so many  words that  the
probability that any of the words sounds like a one-word reference string
is pretty high.  This is pretty much like searching  very short sequences
of letters in the mail body.

  Eric
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: lstsrv-l@uga.BITNET
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-pmrqc:      1
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R3).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Sat, 19 Dec 1992 00:29:29 -0600
From:         Phil Endacott <SUPERVISOR@SWEEP.FO.UKANS.EDU>
Subject:      Does CLINTON@MARIST Exist??

Listsof Lists at NDSUVM1 reports CLINTON as a valid list hosted at
Marist.  When trying to do a search on the database, I received the
following output from Marist.  Have I been caught "inbetween"??  Is
the CLINTON List truly gone??   . . . Phil---

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------

Date:          18 Dec 1992 23:10:33 -0500
From:          Revised List Processor <LISTSERV%MARIST.BITNET@KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU
   > (1.7e)
Subject:       File: "DATABASE OUTPUT"
To:            Phil Endacott <SUPERVISOR@SWEEP.FO.UKANS.EDU>

> search * in CLINTON since 91 -
> where sender contains PSUVM
--> Error: Access control violation, database access denied. Database removed
    from search list.
--> No hit.

> index #.5 date.8 sender.30 subject.34
--> No hit in previous search, nothing to list.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|*|  PHIL ENDACOTT  (PE38)      |*|    <ENDACOTT@KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU>  |*|
|*|  FACILITIES OPERATIONS      |*|        <ENDACOTT@UKANVAX.BITNET>  |*|
|*|  THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   |*|  LAWRENCE, KS   PH: 913-864-3204  |*|
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: LSTSRV-L@UGA.BITNET
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-pmrqc:      1
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R3).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Sat, 19 Dec 1992 12:55:25 -0600
From:         Phil Endacott <SUPERVISOR@SWEEP.FO.UKANS.EDU>
Subject:      CONCEAL SEARCH

//SEARCH JOB ECHO=NO
DATABASE SEARCH DD=RULES
//RULES DD *
SEARCH CONCEAL in LSTSRV-L
INDEX date.8 sender.30 subject.38

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|*|  PHIL ENDACOTT  (PE38)      |*|    <ENDACOTT@KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU>  |*|
|*|  FACILITIES OPERATIONS      |*|        <ENDACOTT@UKANVAX.BITNET>  |*|
|*|  THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   |*|  LAWRENCE, KS   PH: 913-864-3204  |*|
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Mon, 14 Dec 1992 15:20:02 CST
From:         John Andrews 6-5995 <U14780@UICVM.BITNET>
Subject:      local= list parm parm in 1.7e

When we switched from 1.7d to 1.7e, lists that used the local= parm
no longer had their mail split into individual notes as before.
Has anyone else encountered this problem? I looked in the lstsrv-l database
but found no references. In the LISTSERV 1.7d routine LSVXMAIL, there is a
string localnodes which gets used; in 1.7e the string is assigned but
never used. However, the routine is greatly changed, so I can't determine
if there is a really a problem or just a logic change.
Please reply to me directly, as I'm not on the list. Thanks.

John Andrews
INTERNET: U14780@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU
BITNET:   U14780@UICVM
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 10:42:34 EST
From:         "Duane D. Weaver" <WEAVER@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
Subject:      Validate=All commands not working?

The following is the list keywords for a list at OHSTVMA.
A user was able to unsubscribe, and another user was able to do a
SET CONCEAL.    Since Validate= All commands is set, shouldn't these
actions have been prevented?   Perhaps there has been a change
to Validate= All commands, or my understanding of the its use is incorrect.


*
*  CLIMLIST Climatology Distribution List
*
*  Ack= Yes                  Mail-via= DIST2
*  Confidential= No          Validate= All commands
*  Notify= Yes               Subscription= By_owner
*  Review= Private           Errors-to= Owner
*  Send= Owner               Stats= None
*  Files= No                 Notebook= Yes,F,Monthly,Private
*  Reply-to= Sender,Respect
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Computing Center, Virginia Tech.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 12:23:35 EST
From:         Greg Kroll <USDGK@VTVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      problems with the new <listname> WELCOME message file

I'm going to begin slowly transforming the old <listname> MAILFORM files
for subscription notices to the much easier (on me) <listname> WELCOME
method, as announced in the release notes for 1.7e.  Problem is I
cannot get it to work.  Here is what I have done.

1) removed the old <listname> MAILFORM file from LISTSERV's 191 disk.
2) placed an entry for the <listname> WELCOME file in the <listname>
   FILELIST file.
3) I then tried:
   a) saving the <listname> WELCOME file as a normal FILELIST file which
      means it was placed on the <listname> CMS userid.
   b) saving the <listname> WELCOME file on LISTSERV's 191 disk.

Neither method in 3 above will give me the expected results.  When I move
to another userid and subscribe to this list I still get the default
subscription notice (welcome message) from the $DEFAULT MAILFORM file.
What am I doing wrong?

One other question that I suspect Eric will have to answer is; is it possible
to use the <listname> WELCOME method for a list which has no disk space?
Can the <listname> WELCOME file be put on LISTSERV's 191 disk, along with
a FILELIST for this list?  I suspect the answer is no because this would
mean those owner's could put other files on LISTSERV's 191 disk, which
is, of course, a big no-no.


--Greg Kroll
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
From: hooper@ccs.QueensU.CA (Andy Hooper)
Subject: Re:      forward func. on listserv with OV/VM R2
Organization: Queen's University, Kingston
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 18:02:32 GMT

In article <LSTSRV-L%92121509484264@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>,         SGBKC@TTUVM1.BITNET writes:
| FROM Bryan Carson
|   We have recently converted from Profs to OV/VM R2 on a VM/XA
| machine.  I have a few users complaining about the Listserv (1.7d)
| forward function not working with userids defined to OV.  Userids
| not defined to OV seem to work fine.  Has anyone experienced this and
| if so are there fixes available?
|                                      Thanks yet again,
|                                        Bryan Carson

Un-define the users from OV mailbox manager if they want forwarding. OV mail
doesn't place it's messages in the recipient's reader, which is the only
place LISTSERV can find them.

Andy Hooper, Queen's University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Fri, 18 Dec 1992 09:46:57 EST
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2
From:         "Mignon Erixon-Stanford,
              Academic Systems Head" <IRMSS907@SIVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Headers problems

From:    Mignon Erixon-Stanford, Academic Systems Head

I'm getting complaints that users cannot signoff themselves.  I've reviewed
the options and can't see anything that's conflicting.  Any ideas?
TIA.  Here's the header:

* HTECH-L  History of Technology Discussion
*
*   Review= Public   Subscription= Open        Send= Public
*   Notify= No       Reply-to= List,Respect
*   Confidential= No Validate= Store Only      X-Tags= No
*   Default-options= REPRO,NOFILES
*   Stats= Normal,Private                      Ack= Yes
*   Notebook= Yes,F5,Monthly,Public
*   Owner= MAH0H06@SIVM (Steven Lubar)
*   Errors-to= Postmaster

      =-=-=-=-=-=-  IRMSS907@SIVM or SIVM.SI.EDU  -=-=-=-=-=-=
  Research Systems Division     Smithsonian Institution
  Voice: 202-357-4243           Fax: 202-786-2687
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.lstsrv-l
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 10:39:22 EST
From:         Mark Evangelista <EVANGEL@GUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: forward func. on listserv with OV/VM R2

On Tue, 15 Dec 1992 08:48:24 CST <SGBKC@TTUVM1> said:
>FROM Bryan Carson
>  We have recently converted from Profs to OV/VM R2 on a VM/XA
>machine.  I have a few users complaining about the Listserv (1.7d)
>forward function not working with userids defined to OV.

   OV/VM users no longer get their OV "mail" sent to their
   virtual reader.  Instead it is held by the mailbox manager
   service machine GISMBX.

>Userids
>not defined to OV seem to work fine.

   UserIds not defined to OV/VM still get their mail in the old
   PROFS way.

   I see that you are using PUMP.  Customers who require their
   mail forwarded can be in the RFC822 USERS file.  Their
   mail will be converted to RFC822 format and handled by your MTA.
   If you are using MAILER, it can do the forwarding.

   A couple of notes:  Whenever just one person gets mail converted
   by PUMP, all the other non-PUMP recipients will get their mail
   punched to their reader rather than through the mailbox manager.

   We experience problems whenever someone sent a note and ".CC"ed
   someone in the RFC822 USERS file.  Sometimes, they would receive
   headers only, no body.  There might be a fix, but we have not
   pursued this.

Cheers.

Mark Evangelista          * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
                          *   Bitnet: EVANGEL@GUVM                    *
Georgetown University     * Internet: EVANGEL@GUVM.CCF.Georgetown.EDU *
Washington, DC, USA       * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@UCCVMA.UCOP.EDU,@uccvma.ucop.edu:SANTOSUOSSO@FAXON.COM>
X-Vmsmail-To: WINS%"EDI-L@uccvma.ucop.edu"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 08:40:52 -0500
From:         SANTOSUOSSO@FAXON.COM
Subject:      In Reply to: DEC X.435 EDI Product over X.400 on VMS or Ultrix
Comments: To: EDI-L@uccvma.ucop.edu

There certainly is a DEC/EDI product available.  We have purchased the
product and will soon install it.  I believe that DEC/EDI is used more
widely in Europe [where it was developed] at this time.  There is nothing
in the DEC/EDI documentation (Version 1.1) that refers to PEDI or X.435, so
maybe it is in a later (planned?) release.

Joe Santosuosso         Voice:          617-329-3350, ext.464
Senior EDI Analyst      Fax:            617-329-9875
The Faxon Company       Internet:       santosu@faxon.com
15 Southwest Park
Westwood, MA  02090 USA
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@UCCVMA.UCOP.EDU:OPSRJH@UCCVMA>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 08:37:26 PDT
Reply-To:     Zhong Shengyang <bell%ee.sjtu.crn.cn@DARMSTADT.GMD.DE>
From:         Richard Hintz <OPSRJH@UCCVMA.BITNET>
Subject:      DEC X.435 EDI Product over X.400 on VMS or Ultrix

Note: this is being posted for a subscriber who had some temporary problems.

Does anyone have the experience of using DEC X.435 EDI product over X.400
on VMS or ULtrix? I want to know your evaluation on the product, its
performance, interoperability with other EDI system and its APIs? Please
send your reply direct to me.

Zhong Shengyang             Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
bell%ee.sjtu.crn.cn@DARMSTADT.GMD.DE
From: af041@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark Webster)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Subject: RE: EDI World Institute
Date: 17 Dec 1992 16:06:46 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc4.ins.cwru.edu


> How can I get a subscription to EDI World?

Contact EDI World at:

EDI World, Inc.
2021 Coolidge St.
Hollywood, FL 33020-2012

(305) 925-5900

fax:  (305) 925-7533

EDI World is circulated without charge to qualified readers in the U.S.
Canada, and Mexico.  Available to others by subscription at the rate of
$45 (U.S.), $55(Canada and Mexico), $90 (all other countries).

-- 
Mark Webster                   |  mwebster@reach.com    or
Cleveland, OH                  |  af041@cleveland.Freenet.Edu


Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@UCCVMA.UCOP.EDU,@uccvma.ucop.edu:rar0659@hertz.njit.edu>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 12:07:17 -0500
From:         R A Rodgers MSM <rar0659@HERTZ.NJIT.EDU>
Subject:      RE: EDI World Institute
Comments: To: EDI-L@uccvma.ucop.edu

How can I get a subscription to EDI world?
.
Regards, Roy Rodgers
R rar0659@nji   hertz.njit.edu
attmail!drawback
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Date:         Fri, 11 Dec 1992 23:51:34 EDT
From:         Giannis Balafas - CTI <BALAFAS@GRPATVX1.BITNET>
Subject:      Info about EDI and EDI implementations.

Hello everybody,

i am a new member of this list. So, i want to ask all of you the usual
question: Where i can find in the public domain info about EDI as
a document. I 'd also to know if are there any implementations in
EDI in the public domain, and if so, under of which platform, and how i can
get access to them (i.e. the name of the ftp site).

Thanks in advance
  John Balafas

+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
|               |             John Balafas     : Systems & Network Management |
|    CCCCCC     |  C o m p u t e r   T e c h n o l o g y   I n s t i t u t e  |
|   CC          +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
|  CC TTTTTTTT  | E-mail  : (EARN/BITNET)     BALAFAS@GRPATVX1.BITNET         |
| CCCCCC TT     |           (Internet   )       balafas@leon.cti.gr           |
|       TT II   |           (PSI Mail   )    PSI%202336102009::BALAFAS        |
|      TT II    +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
|        II     | P. Mail : Computer Center of Computer Technology Institute  |
|       II      |           P.O. Box 1122, GR-26110 Patras, Greece.           |
|               |           Kolokotroni 3, GR-26221 Patras, Greece.           |
|               +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
|   COMPUTER    | Tel     : +30-61-997585, 997586 (Ext. 22)                   |
|    CENTER     | Tlx     : 312515 CTI GR                                     |
|               | Fax     : +30-61-992061, 991909, 992061                     |
+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@UCCVMA.UCOP.EDU,
             @uccvma.ucop.edu:abb.chinf.infmakh@memo.ericsson.se>
X-Vms-To: IN%"EDI-L@uccvma.ucop.edu"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 16:36:45 +0100
From:         KHOUZAM MARIANNE <abb.chinf.infmakh@MEMO.ERICSSON.SE>
Subject:      Re: DEC X.435
Comments: To: EDI-L@uccvma.ucop.edu

I am also interested in this topic. I would suggest that the answer goes
to the whole list.
Thanks.

Marianne Khouzam
abb.chinf.infmakh\memo.ericsson.se

>
> Does anyone have the experience of using DEC X.435 EDI product over X.400
> on VMS or ULtrix? I want to know your evaluation on the product, its
> performance, interoperability with other EDI system and its APIs? Please
> send your reply direct to me.
>
> Zhong Shengyang             Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
> bell%ee.sjtu.crn.cn@DARMSTADT.GMD.DE
>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@UCCVMA.UCOP.EDU,@uccvma.ucop.edu:bell@ee.sjtu.crn.cn>
X400-Received: by /PRMD=gmd/ADMD=dbp/C=de/; Relayed; 17 Dec 92 12:13:29+0100
X400-Received: by /PRMD=crn/ADMD=/C=cn/; Relayed; 17 Dec 92 18:58:58+0800
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 03:13:51 -0700
Reply-To:     bell%ee.sjtu.crn.cn@darmstadt.gmd.de
From:         Zhong Shengyang <bell@EE.SJTU.CRN.CN>
Subject:      DEC X.435 EDI Product over X.400 on VMS or Ultrix
Comments: To: EDI-L@uccvma.ucop.edu

Maybe it is not the time to talk business. There is no answer about the
DEC/EDI product. I wonder if there is any DEC/EDI product available. I
My friend told me that the DEC representative promise to provide the X.435
product. Does anybody hear of  such a product?

Zhong Shengyang         Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
bell%ee.sjtu.crn.cn@DARMSTADT.GMD.DE
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <@UCCVMA.UCOP.EDU,
             @uccvma.ucop.edu:MacFarland.Hale@heckle.mitre.org>
Posted-From: The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 10:11:22 -0500
From:         MacFarland Hale <MacFarland.Hale@HECKLE.MITRE.ORG>
Subject:      Re: DEC X.435 EDI Product over X.400 on VMS or Ultrix
Comments: cc: Multiple recipients of list EDI-L <EDI-L@uccvma.ucop.edu>
              15 Dec 92 08:37:26 PDT." <9212151645.AA04340@mbunix.mitre.org>

I would also like to hear of anyone's experience with this.  If your reply
isn't appropriate for the list, perhaps you could copy to my email as well.
Thanks.

        Mac

        MacFarland Hale                 machale@mitre.org
        The MITRE Corporation           (617) 271-3703
        202 Burlington Road, MS K331    (617) 271-2352 FAX
        Bedford, MA  01730-1420

> Note: this is being posted for a subscriber who had some temporary problems.
>
> Does anyone have the experience of using DEC X.435 EDI product over X.400
> on VMS or ULtrix? I want to know your evaluation on the product, its
> performance, interoperability with other EDI system and its APIs? Please
> send your reply direct to me.
>
> Zhong Shengyang             Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
> bell%ee.sjtu.crn.cn@DARMSTADT.GMD.DE
>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
From: vchapman@victor02.carleton.ca (Vic Chapman)
Subject: EDI World Institute
Keywords: world institute
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 22:21:41 GMT

Is anyone able to provide me with information on the EDI World
Institute that operates out of Montreal Quebec? It appears to be some
kind of an EDI research institute, but its exact mandate is not clear
to me.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edi-l
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 15:47:55 -0700
From:         Bill Laidley <WLAIDLEY@BCSC02.BITNET>
Subject:      RE: EDI World Institute

Quoting from 'EDI World, The Source for Electronic Data interchange
Management' (I have other blurbs, but this was the first I found...)

"The EDI World Institute brings together national EDI associations and
councils, corporate and government users, as well as research and academic
institutions, to address from a user perspective the business issues related
to the development and use of EDI."

"The Institute has targeted its first four initiatives as follows: 1) a
general inventory of training programs available in different countries; 2)
the linkages between EDI and Computer-Aided Acquisition and Logistics Support;
3) the implementation of EDI in the Pacific Basin for trade and customs; and
4) the use of EDI and Hazardous Wastes. Findings by the Institute will
probably first be presented in a series of regional and international
conferences to promote effective cooperation among all organizations
involved."

(any spelling mistakes, etc. are mine... no emphasis added or editorial
changesmade)

The question is: What does this mean? Anyone out there care to comment?

I won't comment because I'm biased in my views about the participants in this
particular endeavour.

Regards, Bill Laidley
EDI Expert Team
BC Systems Corp. Vancouver (604) 660-9705
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Vmsmail-To: HELLAS
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.hellas
Date:         Sun, 20 Dec 1992 13:12:33 -0700
Reply-To:     DIONYSHS@PHYAST.LA.ASU.EDU
From:         DIONYSHS@PHYAST.LA.ASU.EDU
Subject:      XRONIA POLLA
Comments: To: hellas@brownvm.brown.edu

 Xronia polla kai kales giortes se olous.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU