Via: uk.ac.leicester; Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:24:43 +0100
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:24:00 BST
Reply-To:     Mail_System@LEICESTER.AC.UK
From:         Mail_System@LEICESTER.AC.UK
Subject:      %% Undelivered Mail %%
Comments: To: SAS-L <SAS-L@VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU>

Your mail was not delivered as follows:
%MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'

Your original mail header and message follow.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  16:24 BST
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
          id <sg.26459-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:23:56 +0100
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
          id 9653; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:21:00 EDT
Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
          with BSMTP id 2212; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:20:59 EDT
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:18:00 BST
Reply-To: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
From: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
Subject: %% Undelivered Mail %%
Comments: To: SAS-L <SAS-L@VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>

Your mail was not delivered as follows:
%MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'

Your original mail header and message follow.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  16:18 BST
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
          id <sg.25646-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:10:22 +0100
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
          id 9559; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:09:23 EDT
Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
          with BSMTP id 1569; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:08:22 EDT
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:06:00 BST
Reply-To: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
From: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
Subject: %% Undelivered Mail %%
Comments: To: SAS-L <SAS-L@VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>

Your mail was not delivered as follows:
%MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'

Your original mail header and message follow.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  16:06 BST
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
          id <sg.25354-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:05:49 +0100
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
          id 9507; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:04:51 EDT
Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
          with BSMTP id 1205; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:03:59 EDT
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:02:00 BST
Reply-To: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
From: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
Subject: %% Undelivered Mail %%
Comments: To: SAS-L <SAS-L@VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>

Your mail was not delivered as follows:
%MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'

Your original mail header and message follow.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  16:02 BST
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
          id <g.25076-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:01:32 +0100
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
          id 9473; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:00:35 EDT
Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
          with BSMTP id 0867; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:00:34 EDT
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 14:58:00 BST
Reply-To: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
From: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
Subject: %% Undelivered Mail %%
Comments: To: SAS-L <SAS-L@VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>

Your mail was not delivered as follows:
%MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'

Your original mail header and message follow.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  14:57 BST
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
          id <sg.21458-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1992 14:57:45 +0100
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
          id 9089; Thu, 03 Sep 92 09:56:01 EDT
Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
          with BSMTP id 8200; Thu, 03 Sep 92 09:55:59 EDT
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 08:51:00 CDT
Reply-To: Deb Cannon 319-335-6321 <ADPDKHTS%BITNET.UIAMVS@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
From: Deb Cannon 319-335-6321 <ADPDKHTS%BITNET.UIAMVS@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
Subject: SAS Futures / IBM's Book Manager
To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTENT:  Speculative Question
SUMMARY:  SAS Institute's stand on IBM/Book Manager
REL/PLTF: 5.18/MVS 6.06/MVS 6.07/MVS 6.06/OS/2 6.04/PC-DOS
E-ADDR:   adpdkhts@uiamvs.bitnet
NAME:     Deb Cannon
PHONE:    319-335-6321
----------------------------------------------------------------------

     Our site has recently installed and implemented IBM's new
     Book Manager, an online manual system.  All their manuals shipped
     with new software will be distributed in this way.  That's not to
     say you can't get manuals anymore, but this new systems is so slick
     that I'll never use a paper manual again if I don't have to...what
     impressed me the most was it's ability to interface with SDSF (MVS
     display facility for spool/print datasets):  Placing your cursor on
     a message in the console log, for example, and invoking a PFkey
     that invokes Book Manager, will take you *directly* to the manual
     that explains that message.  Not to mention the waste, in both
     productivity and earth resources, that having manuals online will
     prevent.

     Speaking of manuals, I was working on a SAS problem yesterday
     that caused a pile of 5 manuals on my desk, all open to the
     page I was consulting.  While I have no beef against SAS
     documentation per se, wouldn't it be great to have it all
     ONLINE?  With indexes (a Book Manager feature) , so you can search
     entire 'sets' of manuals for all existing verbage on a feature?
     IBM, I'm told, has left a door open for third-party documentation.
     Anyone heard how SAS is going to react to this?  Surely all the
     manuals are already in machine-readable format.....

     Deb

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
End of returned mail

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
End of returned mail

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
End of returned mail

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
End of returned mail

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
End of returned mail
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU