HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: drkszk@ocf.berkeley.edu (Derek Suzuki)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: GCC 2.1 questions
Date: 24 Jul 1992 13:56:37 GMT
Organization: U. C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
NNTP-Posting-Host: lightning.berkeley.edu
Keywords: gcc gnu c++ compilera

	Has anyone considered writing up a short text file describing
the use of rc.exe, link386.exe, and gcc in general?  This would be
really useful to those of us without access to the Toolkit and especially
those who have never used a command-line compiler.
	Also, is any enhancement planned for this piece of software,
like including a debugger and make program?  And when will information
be available for multimedia programming?
	
	Derek Suzuki
	drkszk@ocf.berkeley.edu

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: byer@adobe.com (Scott Byer)
Subject: VMAlloc busted?
Reply-To: byer@adobe.com (Scott Byer)
Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 17:19:02 GMT


I keep getting error results back from the VMAlloc DevHelp
call, with the correct calling sequence and flags set.
Is this a known problem?  Is it fixed in the kernel
patches on the FTP sites?

If it is busted, how do I get the equivalent functionality?

Scott Byer                                   NeXTMail: byer@adobe.com
Adobe Systems Incorporated               These are *my* opinions, and  
1585 Charleston Road, P.O. Box 7900        do not necessarily reflect
Mountain View, CA 94039-7900             the opinions of my employer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: joe@proto.com (Joe Huffman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Major Borland C++ 3.1 Bugs
Date: 23 Jul 92 18:05:25 GMT
Organization: Prototronics @ Sandpoint, Idaho

sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:

>I am not aware of any patch to the DPMI portion of OS/2, unless
>there's something internal.

FlashTek (the company I work for) received a 'private' fix for some DPMI
bugs from IBM that we distribute with our 32-bit DOS extender that requires 
DPMI support from OS/2.  This fixed some problems with the Zortech compiler
under OS/2, but we haven't tried the Borland DOS compiler under OS/2 yet.

It was our understanding that IBM would be making an official release of
this version of DPMI.SYS at some time in the future...

-- 
netcom!proto!joe
joe@proto.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: brooke@cco.caltech.edu (Brooke Paul Anderson)
Subject: Re: Trouble linking libgpp.a under emx
Keywords: emx, c++
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 11:04:45 GMT

In my config.sys, I have the line

set CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=C:/EMX/INCLUDE.CPP;C:/EMX/INCLUDE

Other than that, I replaced emx.dll with the new version included
in the C++ package, went into emx/lib/misc and typed "make" (which
updates one of the libraries).  Then, I could type "gcc -o hello
hello.cc -lgpp", and everything worked fine.  I didn't need to link
libert.a.  Oh, you should check out the make.cmd file to make sure
the directories in it are specified correctly for your system (they
probably will be).
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: bz7004742@ntuvax.ntu.ac.sg (Roland Yeo)
Subject: emx 0.8d, OS/2 API
Organization: Nanyang Technological University - Singapore
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 06:06:31 GMT

To all using EMX for OS/2:

EMX 0.8d does not have the complete OS/2 API. In DEVELOP.DOC, it mentioned
how to add more functions, using <name> <.DLL> <func #> <# of param>.
(eg, DosClose DOSCALLS 257 3).

Problem #1: I found I only have \OS2\DOSCALLS.LIB and \OS2\DLL\DOSCALL1.DLL
Nowhere can I find DOSCALLS.DLL. Is this normal? When I did a test prgm to
do DosLoadModule to load DOSCALLS, it works. What is exactly happening?
There's no DOSCALLS.DLL as far as I can see.

Problem #2: In the first paragraph above, there's a value <func #> which
is to be the ordinal number of the function. Does this imply the position
of the function in the DLL? Which do I find this piece of information?

Overall, is someone actively adding OS/2 API into EMX?

'il
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: johnw@civil.ubc.ca (John Wong)
Subject: Qbasic serial port problem with os2
Organization: Dept. of Civil Engineering, U.B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 23:59:32 GMT

	I have problem opening com port with Quick basic running under Os2.
Quick basic can't seems to open up the com port. But the same progam works
fine under Dos(when booted from Dos).


John.
From: ccusekh@prism.gatech.EDU (Kevin Hodge)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: OS/2 Device Drivers
Date: 26 Jul 92 19:05:27 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <12368@ecs.soton.ac.uk> fab@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Flavio Bergamaschi) writes:
>
>Hi all;
>
>Does anyone know a good book or reference on writing device drivers for OS/2 v2.0
>
Van Nostrand Reinhold has released _Writing OS/2 2.0 Device Drivers in C_
by Steven J. Mastrianni.  $36.95, 410 pages, ISBN 0-442-01141-5.  I don't
have any information about the quality.  You can contact VNR in the UK at:

Chapman and Hall
2-6 Boundary Row
London SE1 8HN, England
Phone: 011 44 71 865-0066
Fax:   011 44 71 522-9623 

-- 
Kevin A. Hodge                |   "I'll show you a life of the mind!"
Engineering Psychology        |            Madman Mundt
Georgia Tech                  |
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: os2man@panix.com (Larry Salomon Jr.)
Subject: Re: What's wrong with this?
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 02:07:18 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC

In <jarman.711695763@ee.ualberta.ca> jarman@ee.ualberta.ca (Andrew Jarman) writes:

>I have finally got a chance to start porting some of our work utilities
>to OS/2 using GCC 2.1  A lot of our programs are really simple command
>line utilties used for manipulating data files.  Can someone tell
>me what is wrong with this?  I compile and run it under gcc 2.1, no
>errors in the compilation.  The system does not print any output until
>I type in enough input first, or press ^Z, to end my input stream.

>#include <stdio.h>
>#include <stdlib.h>

>main() {
>	char buffer[100];

>	printf("This is a test\n");
>	scanf("%s", buffer);
>	printf("Buffer = %s\n", buffer);
>}

>Is there an ioctl statement I need to use first? This is such a basic
>program that I figure it MUST work.  Any ideas?
>Thanks.

Insure that you set output buffering off.  I believe the call is 
setbuf(stdout,NULL) .
-- 
Cheers,
Q
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"If you still choose not to decide,   | "My other account is in the
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: gjm@cray.com (Gordon Miller)
Subject: Re: ObjectVision 2.0 for OS/2
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 30 Jul 92 10:09:29 CDT

In article <1992Jul27.202441.23700@njitgw.njit.edu> dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:
>
   ...........  Stuff deleted  .................

>OV/2 will sell for a list price of $250, but there's an introductary
>offer on right now, so you can direct-order it for $150.
>
>   |)  David Charlap           "I don't even represent myself


Also, the upgrade price is $99 from ObjectVision for Windows and you get a
$10 rebate.

--Gordon Miller


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca (ochealth)
Subject: Re: Are the two C/C++ compilers going to be integrated?
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 02:31:11 GMT

In article <1992Jul27.013748.4476@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> gupw@uniwa.uwa.edu.au (Paul Wagland) writes:
>Hmm, What I would like to knoe is if the two compilers will be brought
>into one release.  Also I heard something about a second release of the
>compilers.


I sure hope so! I think it may divert people's efforts if two compilers
need to be supported.

So far I think EMX is more stable and faster (libraries). But GCC has better
OS/2 support: system calls, object files etc.

I have heard these areas need work:
	A multi-thread compatible library
	more native OS/2 support
	A DLL for all of the C/C++ libraries (so calling printf doesn't link
	in 30kb of code, where a simple DLL call would reduce code size)
	etc.
	More UNIX features, to make up for OS/2 deficiencies
	anything else?

I think people are working on all this. My guess is EMX will borrow
stuff from GCC, and EMX will be the "official" GNU CC for OS/2.
>
>Any news on this?

sit tight. It'll happen..
>
>many thanx
>-- 
>Paul Wagland            | These opinions are mine and no-one elses
>gupw@uniwa.uwa.edu.au   | I still don't like Microsoft, even after using
>------------------------+  their products. :-)


-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
jpm: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca         
                           Happily using OS/2 2.0 because MS Windows isN'T ___
                                                      Insert VapourFeature ^^^
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: tcf9033@venus.tamu.edu (FREY, TONY C)
Subject: CSD for C SET/2 Available
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 20:30:00 GMT


 There is a CSD available on Compuserve for C SET/2. Say's that it fixes
8 to 10 bugs and offers a 10% increase in compilation performance. The file
is 800k and would take some major time to download. Anyone know if this file
is available somewhere else?

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: gershon%gr.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Elber Gershon)
Subject: OS2 basics
Date: 27 Jul 92 10:34:01 MDT
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept

o.k. OS2 gurus, here is a one (actually two) for you.

* From the books I have which are not for version 2.0 (mainly for 1.1/2), it
  seems their is no way a process can be forked from the command line (i.e
  cmd.exe) and open a PM window while having stdin/out in contact.
	If process A is forked from cmd.exe and process A DosExecPgm
  process B in EXEC_BACKGROUND, then process B can open a PM window while
  process A still have stdin/out. The two processes A and B can then talk
  via pipes.
	The above works but, as expected, is not fast. Is there a way to
  do the above with a single process? That is, can a single process in
  OS2 2.0 open a PM window and have stdin/out intact? Can it be done with a
  thread creation instead of a new process? Sample code will be appreciated.

* What is the fastest way of drawing horizontal lines? Is GpiLine optimized
  for horizontal lines? Is it the OS2 kernel that draw the lines (DDA)
  or is it the display driver?

thanks

Gershon

  
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Elber Gershon                            gershon@cs.utah.edu
918 University village                   Tel: (801) 582-1807 (Home)
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108-1180          Tel: (801) 581-5642 (Work)
From: joe2@vnet.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 18:43:06 FST
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: IOPL summary
Reply-To: <joe2@vnet.ibm.com>
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0

In <4063@news.duke.edu> Jan Gittelman writes:
>Summary on IOPL
>
>1. IOPL'd code has to be 16 bit, can't be 32 bit. So for that matter do device
>   drivers. All 2.0 device drivers according to IBM are 16 bits.
>

   There is another undocumented (yet?) way on OS/2 2.0 : provided
that TESTCFG.SYS is installed, you can use this driver for simple
I/O : use DosDevIOCtl, Category 80h


1) FOr an IN instruction : function 41h
   Parameter packet:
    USHORT io_address
    USHORT data_width  (1 for byte, 2 for word, 4 for dword)

   Data packet:
   ULONG value(value read)

2) For an OUT instruction: function 42h
   Parameter packet:
    USHORT io_address
    USHORT data_width
    ULONG  value

    No data packet


    Hope this helps!


    -Joel Armengaud
From: sl31+@andrew.cmu.edu (Stephen M. Lacy)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Programming OS/2 2.0 ...
Date: 27 Jul 92 14:16:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.UeR7LEG00Vor816W11
Organization: Sophomore, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Excerpts from netnews.comp.os.os2.programmer: 27-Jul-92 Programming OS/2
2.0 ... Brian Matusz@vela.acs.oa (647)

> When programming for Windows, I picked up the Petzold book ... is there
> something comparable for OS/2?  I will most likely get the RedBooks

Petzold has a book on OS/2, although it was written using OS/2 version
1.1, so it doesn't cover things like ATM, and the other nicities of
V2.0, but it still does have a section on using DosCreateThread to
multitask things (I've yet to read it) 

I've foind the book a great start to get into programming PM, and OS/2,
and have had almost no problems (at least ones that were not solvable by
all you wonderful netlanders) using the native port of gcc.  The name of
the book is "Programming the OS/2 Presentation Manager" and is put out
by, guess who, Microsoft Press.  Hope this helps...

Steve

"If I were a fish, I'd dream of flying"
From: andrew@ddsw1.mcs.com (Andrew Gilbert)
Subject: Re: The expensive IBM doc set
Organization: ddsw1.MCS.COM Contributor, Chicago, IL
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 16:02:33 GMT
X-Disclaimer:  Material posted in this article is the sole responsibility of
                the poster and does not represent MCSNet or the system owners.

dlb5404@tamsun.tamu.edu (Daryl Biberdorf) writes:
: In article <1992Jul29.154428.12738@njitgw.njit.edu> dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:
: >In article <1992Jul28.021436.2865@hellgate.utah.edu> brian%jensen.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Brian Sturgill) writes:
: >>Why does IBM charge so much for the hardcopy manual set?
: >Perhaps because it consists of 17 large volumes?
: 
: Something that I haven't seen mentioned in this discussion (or I may have
: missed it) is that you don't have to buy all 17 volumes.  Each volume
: has its own IBM publication number, so you can order them separately
: (or so a Team OS/2 member tells me).
: 
: Now, would someone who was rich enough to pay the $300 volunteer to
: post the title and publication number (and maybe even a brief
: description) of each volume in the set?  Chances are, most of us will
: only need a handful of volumes to get our job done.
: 

If you have the redbooks, there are references to some volumes that will
get you started. I just received Presentation Manager Programming Reference
Vol I. today. There are three volumes in the set. Vol I contains API
reference for GPI,etc type calls. Vol II contains window API calls, workplace
things. Vol III contains data type info, messages, etc. There is also a
OS/2 2.0 Programming Guide, which has a number of volumes. Call an IBM office,
talk to the librarian and you are on your way. (Now everybody don't flood
them with so many requests that there is a backlog by the time I can afford
the next one....)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: rgillespie@vx9000.weber.edu (Rex Gillespie)
Subject: netware 3.11 in a dos box?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Organization: Weber State University ComSci Department
Date: 31 Jul 1992 10:07 MST  

I just recieved a copy of netware 3.11 from work and intend to do some
developmemt with it.  I am a new convert to os/2 and have ordered it and should
recieve it shortly. I would li8ke to know if I can run netware in a dos box on
os/2.  I plan to connect to one other machine for testing purposes and would
like to know if there is something I can do.
	Thanks in advance.
				Rex M. Gillespie 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: ezeller@iiic.ethz.ch (Emil Johann Zeller)
Subject: Problem with checkbox
Organization: Dept. Informatik, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH)
Distribution: usa, local
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 06:52:58 GMT

#define INCL_WIN
#include <os2.h>

MRESULT ClientWinProc(HWND, USHORT, MPARAM, MPARAM);

#define ID_BUTTON 1
#define CWPM_CREATE WM_USER

main()
{
  HAB hab;
  HMQ hmq;
  QMSG qmsg;
  HWND hwndFrame, hwndClient;

  ULONG flCreateFlags = FCF_TITLEBAR | FCF_SYSMENU | FCF_SIZEBORDER |
                        FCF_MINMAX | FCF_SHELLPOSITION | FCF_TASKLIST;

  static CHAR szClientClass[] = "Client Messages";

  hab = WinInitialize(0);
  hmq = WinCreateMsgQueue(hab, 0);

  WinRegisterClass(hab, szClientClass, ClientWinProc, CS_SIZEREDRAW, 0);

  hwndFrame = WinCreateStdWindow(HWND_DESKTOP, WS_VISIBLE, &flCreateFlags,
            szClientClass, " - Controls", 0L, (HMODULE) NULL, 0, &hwndClient);

  while (WinGetMsg(hab, &qmsg, NULL, 0, 0))
    WinDispatchMsg(hab, &qmsg);

  WinDestroyWindow(hwndFrame);
  WinDestroyMsgQueue(hmq);
  WinTerminate(hab);

  return 0;
}

MRESULT ClientWinProc(HWND hwnd, USHORT msg, MPARAM mp1,
           MPARAM mp2)
{
  HWND hwndControl;
  RECTL rcl;
  SHORT cx, cy;

  switch (msg)
  {
    case WM_CREATE:
      WinPostMsg(hwnd, CWPM_CREATE, NULL, NULL);
      return FALSE;
      break;

    case CWPM_CREATE:
      WinQueryWindowRect(hwnd, &rcl);
      cx = (SHORT)((rcl.xRight - rcl.xLeft) / 2);
      cy = (SHORT)((rcl.yTop -rcl.yBottom) / 2);
      hwndControl = WinCreateWindow(hwnd, WC_BUTTON, "Beep on WM_PAINT", WS_VISIBLE | BS_AUTOCHECKBOX,
                                    cx - 100, cy - 10, 200, 20, hwnd, HWND_TOP, ID_BUTTON, NULL, NULL);
      break;

    case WM_PAINT:
      if (SHORT1FROMMR(WinSendMsg(hwndControl, BM_QUERYCHECK, NULL, NULL))) WinAlarm(HWND_DESKTOP, WA_NOTE);
      return(WinDefWindowProc(hwnd, msg, mp1, mp2));
      break;

    case WM_ERASEBACKGROUND:
      return TRUE;
      break;

    default:
      return(WinDefWindowProc(hwnd, msg, mp1, mp2));
      break;
  }

  return NULL;
}
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: joker@diku.dk (Morten Christian Holmgreen)
Subject: Re: Need OS/2 2.0 C Developer's Workset/2 FAST
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 20:36:59 GMT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, U of Copenhagen

Is the $295 an upgrade price or is it the normal price??? Here in Denmark,
the normal version costs $1200 !!!

If it's the normal price, does any of you know whether IBM US will ship
it to me in Denmark and charge my Master Card or is it competing with
IBM Denmark???

Thanks,

Christian
-- 
M. Christian Holmgreen / joker@diku.dk / mochmch@uts.uni-c.dk
student, University of Copenhagen, Dept. of Computer Science
"Human errors can only be avoided if one can avoid the use of humans"
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: bauwens@acs.ucalgary.ca (Luc Bauwens)
Subject: Re: Watcom Fortran, anyone have it?
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 15:20:33 GMT
Organization: The University of Calgary, Alberta

In article <Bs3LMs.I3w@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Todd Henderson) writes:
>I have just gotten some info about Watcom Fortran and was interested in 
>hearing from someone who actually has it.  
>
>The biggest concern is documentation.  In the info I have it list:
> [...} 
>Nowhere does it mention OS/2 Programming Guide.  It does talk about OS/2
>programming, i.e. it can be used for that, but does not indicate what kind
>of information is provided.
 
It works fine under (and for) OS/2.  Specific sections in the documentation
refer to programming for/under OS/2.

>I'm mainly getting it for the purpose of faster 32-bit codes.  I like the
>idea of being able to run some simple Euler codes and grid generation at
>home for debugging and such.(CFD)  But, I would also like to play around with 
>the OS/2 programming for PM or WPS.(my terminology for OS/2 is all screwed up
>right now)

The Watcom package alone is fine insofar as you want to port/write text-mode
(full-screen or windowed) OS/2 applications.

While there are parts of the documentation to refer to PM apps, they
assume that the reader is knowledgeable/has additional information
and additional libraries for OS/2 system calls/PM calls.

Thus, to write PM apps, it would appear that it would be necessary to get
not only the Watcom fortran but also IBM's Workset/2.  BTW, the
Watcom stuff appears to be compatible/fully integrable within the
workset/2.

This said, I am generally pleased with it.

Luc B
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Major Borland C++ 3.1 Bugs
Date: 23 Jul 92 04:31:47 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <zagmfyc.feustel@netcom.com> feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel) writes:
>>I've started using Borland's C++ 3.1 on stock GA OS/2 v2.0 and I've
>>run into major problems which may be caused by defects in DPMI.SYS.
>I tried running bc under msdos 5.0 and still had the problem that the
>compiler produced no object modules even though the code compiled
>successfully. I got code and was able to run the program after
>deselecting the "produce asm files" from the compiler options box.
>DPMI.SYS does not appear to be available from software.watson.ibm.com.
>Does anyone know where the file can be FTP'd from?

I am not aware of any patch to the DPMI portion of OS/2, unless
there's something internal.

Stupid question perhaps, but have you set DPMI to ENABLED in DOS
settings?  Also, have tried to resolve the keyboard problems by
turning on the keyboard rate lock and turning off the keyboard
extended buffer, again both in DOS settings?

-- 
Get the OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST | Timothy F. Sipples
from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp,     | Internet: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu
directory pub/os2/all/faq, or from      | Dept. of Econ., U. Chicago, 60637
LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP"). | Tsongas > Perot > Clinton.  Yay.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: rofische@iiic.ethz.ch (Roman Fischer)
Subject: Input Hook
Originator: rofische@d13
Organization: Dept. Informatik, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 06:33:21 GMT

Hi there,

I've got a problem with a program monitoring the system queue. As proposed in
the Microsoft OS/2 programmer's reference i installed a hook procedure for
Input-Msg (Mouse, Keyboard).
Now i've got the following problems:
a.) In vol. 1 of the reference, the example for a input-hook doesn't match 
    the defenition of the hook-procedure (last parameter !)
b.) I tried both possibilites (2 or 3 parameters) for the hook procedure
    and I didn't get any input-msgs at all. All i seem to get are WM_TIMER
    msg !

Now my questions:

Has anybody ever written a hook procedure for input msgs (HK_INPUT), or is
this a bug in OS/2 2.0 ?

Thanks in advance for any help.

Roman

-- 
----------------------------------------------
INTERNET: rofische@iiic.ethz.ch
DECNET:   14LBS::PSI%47931149420::ROFISCHE (?)
----------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
From: jsykes@dadd.ti.com (Jonathan Sykes)
Subject: Re: How to install gccbin21.zoo
Reply-To: jsykes@dadd.ti.com
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 15:09:55 GMT

zoo 2.1 is available on ftp-os2.nmsu.edu in

/pub/os2/all/zoo210s.zoo   - sources
/pub/os2/all/zoo210s.exe   - PC executable

I had no problems building a version for our SUNs with the source. I used
this to unZOO gcc and then reZOO into smaller chunks which would fit on a
1.44Mb disc. It had no problems with the case sensitive and hpfs names.

Let me know if you need a Sparc exec of zoo 2.1

---
           __o
           \<,
_________()/ ()_______________________________________________________________
Jon Sykes                                                   jsykes@dadd.ti.com
Design Automation Div.                                          (214) 997-2916
Texas Instruments Inc. Dallas, Tx.