HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: barrus@cod.nosc.mil
Subject: Re: Q on A Few Good Men: Poison???
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, CA
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 01:20:25 GMT


In article <2B4B5E80.19966@news.service.uci.edu>  writes:
>In article <1993Jan6.005505.28065@nosc.mil> barrus@cod.nosc.mil writes:
>>
>>>
>>>The final scene is completely inane.  Nicholson's knew that 
>>>ordering the "Code Red" was against order's from superiors.
>>>He knew enough to alter flight logs to cover his tracks.
>>>I really can't believe that anyone would buy him being stupid
>>>enough to admit ordering it.  In the heat of an exchange.
>>>C'mon.  A successful combat officer (which we are led to believe
>>>he is) is successful because he doesn't lose his cool when
>>>under stress.  And, then on top of it, asking "what did I do
>>>wrong?" after he gets arrested.  If he didn't know he was 
>>>culpable, why was he altering flight logs. 
>>>
>>Cruise knew that Nicholson thought he was correct on this and
>>shouldn't have to hide from the truth.  This is why Cruise struggled
>>to decide whether it would be worth risking his career to try to
>>make him admit it on the stand.  Nicholson only wouldn't admit it
>
>Nicholson DID admit it.
>
Only after Cruise made him 

>>because he knew that others wouldn't or couldn't be able to see "the truth"
>>from his "Marine" point of view.  He always believed he was right.  This
>>was the whole point of the climax, not to save the defendants, but 
>>to watch Cruise take that risk against a very experienced officer 
>>because he thought he could do it.  Nicholson failed to see that
>>he was wrong because he was arrogant.  
>
>And I just didn't buy that.  He knew that HE would suffer adverse
>consequences if it was known that he ordered the "code red".
>That's why he covered it up by altering flight logs. 
>I do not understand why he would suddenly forget that. 
>Because in his years of service no one (enlisted or commissioned)
>had ever disobeyed an order.  Yeah, right.
>

Yes, he knew that He would suffer adverse consequenses if he was found
out.  But that doesn't mean he still didn't believe he was right.  He
didn't think that anyone would understand his reasoning because they
were not Marines.  Cruise knew that he thought he was right and that
he couldn't stand the idea of having to suppress what he believed in 
because others were incapable of understanding.  Cruise felt that
Nicholson's ego was big enough that he could make him admit it on 
the stand.  A pretty risky move that might not happen in real life.  
Who's to say.  In this case the ego was big enough.

JDB



Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: schumach@stortek.com (Kurt Schumacher)
Subject: Re: Siskel & Ebert's Worst List?
Reply-To: schumach@stortek.com
Organization: Storage Technology Corp
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 13:16:25 GMT

In article 10871@eng.umd.edu, clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles Lin) writes:
>    I have had this happened to me two years in a row.   It seems as if
>the new year means that local tv stations can move around all their
>shows.   Since TV guides and local newspapers don't alphabetize the shows
>and list the times, it is very time-consuming to find whether the show
>has just been dropped or moved to a new time.   
>

My local station ran S&E after a golf tournament, which of course ran late.
They joined the S&E show "already in progress", so all I got to see was the
last five minutes!  Why did they even bother?
From: bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Robert Church)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: In-joke during Muppet's Christmas movie.
Date: 9 Jan 93 03:58:30 GMT
Organization: Ohio University School of Art. Athens

>> >Did anyone else see the in-joke during the Muppet's Christmas movie?
>> 
>> >One of the stores had the name "MICKLEWHITE " on the front.
>> 

And how about the two Marleys? Jacob and Bob.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jhouge@craysea.cray.com (Jennifer Houge)
Subject: Re: The Wizard of Oz
Keywords: toto
Organization: Cray Research, Inc. - Americas West
Date: 7 Jan 93 14:20:58 CST

In article <1ihnicINN6fc@ensta.ensta.fr> dussert@beatrice.ensta.fr (Pierre Dussert) writes:
>	Hello everybody!
>
> Does someone remember the name of the little girl played by Judy Garland in the
> Wizard of Oz?
>
>				Alex

Dorothy.
From: william@cithara.login.qc.ca (William Ross)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: The Wierd List
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 21:58:25 EST
Organization: Organ Grinders Monkeys Union With Penguins As Mascots

annie@garnet.berkeley.edu  (Anne Jessop) writes:

> 
> Hi, just remembered _Performance_, yet another Ken Russell flick, with
> Mick Jagger and James Fox.  
> Also, it occurs to me that some might think of all those Esther Williams
> water ballet type movies as pretty wierd...
> _They Live_ (with Rowdy Roddy Piper, of WWF fame...)
> _Repulsion_ (Roman Polanski, with Catherine Deneuve.  Creepy, creepy film!!)
> _Baby Doll_ (I forget who's in this, but it's about a Southern guy who has
> a really regressive "child bride".  I believe it was banned at one time.)
> 
> 
> A good general source for wierd movies is put out by ReSearch.  It's
> called, oddly enough, _Incredibly Strange Films_.  It breaks them down
> into rough genres, and includes interviews with filmamkers and stars.

You could add Carnival of Souls to your wierd movie list. Wierd because it
was a good script that was made into a really bad, bad film. Too bad.

> 
> -annie
> 
> 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
William Ross
cithara                 Specalists in asbestos underwear
                        since 1992                william@cithara.login.qc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: barrus@cod.nosc.mil
Subject: Re: The Weird List
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, CA
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 16:01:01 GMT


In article <C0H3K0.184@vcd.hp.com> news@vcd.hp.com (News user) writes:
>	Here are some more "altered reality" flicks:
>
>		Twin Peaks
>
>		The Dark Backward
>
>		Bride of Reanimator
>
>		From Beyond
>
>		* of the Living Dead
>
>		Altered States
>
>		The Trip
>
>		Planet of the Apes
>
>		Empire of the Sun

Why would you class "Empire of the Sun" in "Altered Reality" films?

JDB
From: corleyj@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley )
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Would you pay to see it (again) on the BIG screen?
Date: 12 Jan 93 18:02:26 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson

> [list of movies to see again on the big screen deleted]

Great Idea!  Whoops I just deleted your attribution line..sorry dude.

But why limit yourself to modern movies?  Try "Duck Soup", or "Modern Times",
or "The Maltese Falcon", or "The Thin Man".  Any of these or hundreds others
would get me to see every show I could, and I know there's a lot of other
people who like "ancient" movies better, too.  Just because it ain't in color
and don't have explosions doesn't mean it's bad.

	Yours.
	Jason
From: lorenh@hpcvra.cv.hp.com (Loren Heisey)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 20:49:09 GMT
Subject: Re: 2 movie questions
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, OR, USA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

>First question:
>
>Does anyone know what place T2 is in as far as top grossing '91 movies,
>as well as where it places on the all-time list?

The following were the top-ten grossing movies in the United States
and Canada in 1991 according to an article by John Hartl in the
Seattle Times/Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Sunday, 26 Jan 1992.

U.S./CANADA TOP TEN, 1991

 1  TERMINATOR 2                   $204,396,312
 2  ROBIN HOOD, PRINCE OF THIEVES   165,493,908
 3  HOME ALONE                      132,912,751 (plus $153,084,249 from 1990)
 4  THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS        130,742,922
 5  CITY SLICKERS                   123,471,085
 6  DANCES WITH WOLVES              122,448,381 (plus $62,672,428 from 1990)
 7  SLEEPING WITH THE ENEMY         100,381,912
 8  THE ADDAMS FAMILY                98,427,981
 9  THE NAKED GUN 2 1/2              86,930,411
10  BEAUTY AND THE BEAST             82,470,981

It did not make enough to place it in the top 10 of all-time list
but might make the top 20.

--
Loren Heisey
Internet: lorenh@hpcvra.cv.hp.com
UUCP    : {decwrl|rutgers|ucbvax}!hplabs!hp-pcd!lorenh
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: cad0410@ritvax.isc.rit.edu (Cecelia A. Dorn)
Subject: Re: Who remembers this old flick?  PRIZES!! PRIZES!!
Reply-To: cad0410@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 21:33:54 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.123319@usho72.hou281.chevron.com>, hhtra@usho72.hou281.chevron.com (T.M.Haddock) writes:
>In article <1993Jan5.162706.5567@ultb.isc.rit.edu>, cad0410@ritvax.isc.rit.edu (Cecelia A. Dorn) writes:
>|> Okay, here's one for all you trivia junkies out there.  Anybody remember
>|> a show called something like "Monster Movie Matinee" that was on Sat.
>|> afternoons in the mid/late 60's that was hosted by Igor and ....
>|> 
>|> Wait now, put down your hands...that's not my question yet.  My question has
>|> to do with a particular movie that I saw a couple of times on that show.
>|> This movie was about witches and All Hollow's Eve and reincarnation....
>|>
>|> ... of strange imps (Billy Barty is one of these imps -- he's the only
>|> actor that I knew by name) and they give Maid Meg some mischievous
>|> bad time and then they disappear (via bad special effects).  There
>|> are a lot of other bad special effects throughout the film and it
>|> all culminates on All Hollow's Eve when the witches all get together
>|> for some purpose which I can't remember anymore.....
>
> Well, doing a cross check on Billy Barty in the r.a.m. actors list
> narrows it to one of these:
>
>       HARUM SACRUM
>
>       LOBSTER MAN FROM MARS
>
>       THE HAPPY HOOKER GOES TO WASHINGTON
>
> Right?
>
> TRAVIS

Can't say that any of those sound correct.  Maybe this movie
was so bad that Billy didn't want to admit to making it.
I'm very certain it was him in the imp role.

--Cea

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: roland@quadsys.com (Roland Besserer)
Subject: Re: (Unsolicited) advice against Blockbuster
Organization: QUAD Systems
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 06:02:17 GMT

spinaa@rpi.edu (Matt Garretson) writes:
: 
: My prediction for the future of good films on video is that we'll have to 
: rely on companies that do rentals by mail to get anything that is even
: slightly out of the mainstream.

I see some hope with laserdisc rental places. At least the ones I have been
to are stocking a wider selection of 'the unusual' than your average
tape store. I hardly every rent tapes anymore, not only because of the
inferior quality, but because most releases come out on disk at the same
time as the tape releases. I'm glad laserdisc had this revival after being
pronounced dead years ago.

-- 

Roland Besserer							     '86 RG500
QUAD Systems							    '91 RGV250
roland@quadsys.com	"License and registration please!" "What registration?"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mcameron@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (melissa joan cameron)
Subject: Re: PEEVES at MOVIE THEATERS !
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 18:34:42 GMT

In article <Jan.8.14.15.12.1993.29765@math.rutgers.edu> bgonzal@math.rutgers.edu (Bil Gonzalez) writes:
>(Joseph D. Barrus) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan7.192016.6060@brtph560.bnr.ca> news@brtph560.bnr.ca (Usenet News) writes:
>>>Michael Grimes (mgrimes@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu) wrote:
>>>: Any others to share?
>
>>- people that feel that they have to talk to the screen, like
>>"Don't go near there, you know your gonna get killed"
>
>Like they are at home watching "TV".  I once acually experienced this
>during a Broadway performance of "42nd Street".  A woman stood up in
>about the 6th row, right on the aisle, and started yelling at one of
>the characters that she didn't like.  It took even the actors by surprise.
>B Gonzalez

Actually, that's why I don't go to movies a lot, because I like to do
that and don't want to annoy anyone.  But once weeknight at a late
show, my family and I were the only ones in the whole theatre.  It was
great!!!  Free to make as much noise as I wanted, to run up and down
the aisles if i chose to... those were the days!  BTW, the flick was
"Vice Versa," you know, that *smash hit* with Judge Reinhold and Fred
Savage... ;) Melissa
From: isbell@ai.mit.edu (Charles L Isbell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: TOP TEN MOVIES, as of 23 December 1993
Date: 5 Jan 93 09:34:38
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
	<mattm-301292191224@mcmelmon.apple.com>
	<ISBELL.92Dec31125236@pop-tarts.ai.mit.edu> <76027@apple.apple.COM>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pop-tarts.ai.mit.edu
In-reply-to: mattm@Apple.COM's message of 31 Dec 92 22:29:50 GMT

mattm@Apple.COM (Matthew Melmon) writes:
|isbell@ai.mit.edu (Charles L Isbell) writes:
|>|One might call the film a "White Elephant" if one were a particularly
|>|masochistic pundit.
|>Or not.  How much of the cost of the film was donated by Cosby, Oprah,
|>Jordan, Lee himself, et al?  Wasn't it order 15 million?

|No.  In order to raise additional financing beyond what the studio
|provided, Lee went to prominent black entertainers.  So, those
|stars would have provided approximately six million, at most (Lee
|I believe invested two million of the three he was to be paid 
|for the film - compared to Cosby and Oprah, Spike does not have
|the financial resources to actually back a film).  I assume that
|Cosby and Oprah expected to get a return on their money, and that
|it was not just given away.  Depending on the financial arrangements
|payback would not occur until the film returned to the studio
|what it cost to produce - and for that to happen, it will have to
|roughly double its cost in gross (so, 66 million) *plus* ten
|million for promotional expenses (that's probably a low estimate).
[...]

Cosby, Michael Jackson, Oprah and others *gave* him money from all the
reports I read, not *loaned* him money.

I coulda sworn it was  >10 million.  The studio wanted to give him
like 28 and it cost how much?

|So, until it hauls in 76 million, nobody makes any money (except
|the theater owners - maybe).

|I will, however, admit that I do not like Spike Lee, and so I
|am somewhat eager to see him go down in flames.  It is entirely
|possible that the overseas market will save them - though I
|am very skeptical the Japanese will even sniff at it, and Japan
|is a pretty damn big market.  If, however, it does manage to
|match the American release for receipts, the film will make
|perhaps two million in profit, divided amongst the investors.

I think Spike Lee makes great movies.

|Spike is going to take a bath on this one, and when your a
|fire-breathing, controversy-seeking director of arguable
|talent - you don't get many baths before you go away.

I think you're projecting your hopes too much.  Even if this doesn't
break even, Spike Lee will come out well.
--
Peace.
               "I never heard of them.  But I know that rap is the
                music where it rhymes."
                         -President Bush on rapper Ice Cube, May 1992
                                   -\--/-
    Don't just adopt opinions     |  \/  |       Some of you are homeboys
          develop them.           |  /\  | but only I am The Homeboy From hell
                                   -/--\-
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Review: A Few Good Men.
Date: 6 Jan 93 16:36:12 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

In article <C0FrpB.88r@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu>, mftjs@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu 
(T. Jerry Scott) writes:

>>                              A Few Good Men

> My question for the group who have seen this exciting movie is, "Who did 
> the best acting job: Tom, Demi, or Jack?"

That's a tough call...as many have pointed out Jack was just being Jack.
Then again I was really disappointed with Demi in the first half, she didn't
make me believe in her character.  As for Tom he really sparkled during the 
court room scenes, but I felt he was also "playing himself" for quite a good
deal of it.  Don't get me wrong, I thought they were all cast well and did
a good job, it was a very entertaining movie...but as to who did the best as
far as acting:

Kevin Pollak, the stand-up-comedian/tv/movie actor who played Tom's
assistant (Sam?).  The best line in the movie was "and I have no 
responsiblity here!"

Greg Bole                            "We ride...to hell.  Or to glory.  
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu         It depends on your point of view."
                                Errol Flynn in _They Died With Their Boots On_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: bryant@icd.teradyne.com (Wayne Bryant)
Subject: Re: diary of a shinjuku thief
Reply-To: bryant@icd.teradyne.com
Organization: Teradyne, Inc. Boston MA
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 14:25:39 GMT

In article QfGOS4m00iV201ZLsP@andrew.cmu.edu, mw2i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael Winston Woodring) writes:
>Anyone know if this Japanese film is on video?  And if it is, where I
>can get it?
>
>Thanks.
>Mike

I have been looking for this film for a long time and have never found it on video.

					Wayne
From: lobaugh@a.chem.upenn.edu (John Lobaugh)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Sick and tired of cries of sexism (was Re: 9 1/2 Weeks)
Date: 11 Jan 93 03:45:43 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Dec31.010231.9462@cbnewse.cb.att.com> gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart) writes:
>In article <1992Dec30.141639.5308@vlsi.polymtl.ca> d40937@boole (Jean Yves Desbiens) writes:

>>Most of those targeted commercials are so stereotypical that they  make
>>me want to puke, the bud adds a particularly offensive, a 25 year
>>differential exists between the men an women in them. The detergent
>>commercials are targeted towards women when in all of my friends houses the
>>*men* do the dishes. 
>>

But who buys the soap?

-- 
John  lobaugh@a.chem.upenn.edu
From: sahle@csgrad.cs.vt.edu (Eskinder Sahle)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Favorite Quotes...
Keywords: The Last of the Mohicans
Date: 8 Jan 93 19:20:40 GMT
Organization: VPI&SU Computer Science Department, Blacksburg, VA

Hi all:

Any favorite movie quotes? Please add....  And if you see any mistakes,
please post a correction....

Thanks,
Ahmed

--------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) "Fasten your seatbelts, its going to be a bumpy night."

(2) "Should I ice her or should I marry her--which one of these?"

(3) "I could have been a contender, but I ended up being a bum"

(4) "Is that a gun you're carrying or are you just happy to see me?"

(5) "You talkin' to me?"

(6) "I'll organize a revolt, exact a death for a death, and I'll never 
    rest until every Saxon in this shire can stand up free men and strike a 
    blow for Richard and England...  From this night on I'll use every means in 
    my power to fight you!"

(7) "In case your aim is better than your judgement."

(8) "What kind of mother would I be if I didn't give my girls tits...tips?"

(9) "For blood is the life!"

(10) "Dr. Chandra, will I dream?"

(11) "We ride...to hell.  Or to glory.  It depends on your point of view."

(12) "Look how they messed up my boy."  [Please help with exact wording]

















Answers:
(1) Betty Davis in  _All About Eve_
(2) Jack Nicholson in _Prizzi's Honor_
(3) Marlon Brando in _On the Waterfront_
(4) Mae West in _????_ -- the one with Cary Grant.
(5) Robert DeNiro in _Taxi Driver_
(6) Errol Flynn to Claude Rains in  _The Adventures of Robin Hood_
(7) Daniel Day-Lewis in _Last of the Mohicans_
(8) Dustin Hoffman in _Tootsie_
(9) Gary Oldman in _Bram Stoker's Dracula_
(10) HAL-9000 _2010_
(11) Errol Flynn in _They Died With Their Boots On_
(12) Marlon Brando in _The Godfather_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: anthony@panzer.b17b.ingr.com (Anthony Shipman)
Subject: Re: Why X _is_ making money
Organization: Intergraph
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:54:16 GMT

In article <sterbenc-040193150223@150.130.23.185>, sterbenc@ivhs.mot.com (Joe Sterbenc) writes:
|> Um, guys...
|> 
|> It's not challenging the Culkinator or setting records, but X is 
|> already in 8-digit profits - in spite of the Amazing Colossal Budget.
|> 
|> There is one simplereason it's not as blockbustery as y'all apparently
|> expect it to be. Can you name any box office smash that was three and
|> a half hours long? It's simply too long to be an ideal box office movie.
|> 

Dances with Wolves, Gone with the Wind, Dr. Zhivago, Lawrence of Arabia, Ben Hur,
The Ten Commandments, etc., etc.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: cew2w@Virginia.EDU ("Chris Wrike")
Subject: Re: 2 movie questions
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:17:48 GMT

eiswirth@vixvax.mgi.com  writes:
> First question:
> 
> 	Does anyone know what place T2 is in as far as top grossing '91 movies,
> 	as well as where it places on the all-time list?
> 
	It clocks in at number twelve.  "Ghost" is right ahead
at number eleven and "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade" is
number thirteen.  However, if you adjust all movies to 1991
inflation dollars, T2 would have to have made an extra 150 mil.
to make the top ten.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: spinaa@rpi.edu (Matt Garretson)
Subject: Re: The Cook...Lover/women's response
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 17:50:07 GMT

In article <1992Dec28.075047.23608@datamark.co.nz> thomas@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Beagle) writes:
>I have been a fan of Peter Greenaway (the director) for a while and
>have noticed that a lot of his films do not have a great attitude
>towards women.
>
>For example, _Drowning By Numbers_ has three women killing their
>husbands and using their sex appeal to manipulate a man into covering
>it up. When he finally decides to reveal all, they dispose of him too.

This is basically true, but the overall theme of the movie is more anti-man
than it is anti-woman. Several net.people have suggested G'way's book
"Fear of Drowning by Numbers", and now, having finally read it, I can
recommend it as well. In any case, I wouldn't say that the men in the film
were all innocent victims of evil women, although it may look that way since
practically all the men in the film were killed by by the 3 main female
characters.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: yep@wam.umd.edu (Someone Strange)
Subject: Re: PEEVES at MOVIE THEATERS!
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 21:27:04 GMT

In article <1993Jan9.051004.18830@Princeton.EDU> spencer@phoenix.princeton.edu (S. Spencer Sun) writes:
>Not really.  I am more than happy to handle reasonable complaints when
>politely brought to the attention of the staff.  I am very embarrassed
>if the problem could have been prevented.  I do not, however, subscribe
>to the idea that the patron is some god that should be worshipped.
>
>Lisa, do you have management experience?  I'm wondering if that perhaps
>gives a different perspective.  If you have, I guess it doesn't then...
>
yes i do have experience.  in fact, i've had 3yrs of it.
we were always taught to deal with ALL complaints--whether you knowingly
know it's your fault or not.  the main point is to keep the customer happy,
and give 'em a BIG CHEEZY GRIN (and bear it).  
we believe that every patron is a valued customer..i mean, how else can
you get repeat business or business to keep you afloat?
true, some customers are total assholes, but it's your job to keep your
cool and make things right.

E ME!
Yep "then there are times when you just want to give 'em a big WHACK" yep
yep@wam.umd.edu


BUH-ByE!
>-)))-D

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mlh@eddy.austin.ibm.com (Mike Haskell)
Subject: Re: The Wizard of Oz
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 16:06:30 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <1993Jan7.224843.6823@ee.gatech.edu> wung@eecom.gatech.edu writes:
>In article 26537@b8.b8.ingr.com, anthony@panzer.b17b.ingr.com (Anthony Shipman) writes:
>>|In article <1ihnicINN6fc@ensta.ensta.fr>, dussert@beatrice.ensta.fr (Pierre Dussert) writes:
>>||> 	Hello everybody!
>>||> 
>>||>  Does someone remember the name of the little girl played by Judy Garland in the
>>||>  Wizard of Oz?
>>||> 
>>||> 				Alex
>>|
>>|Scarlett O'Hara?
>
>
>You mean Dorothy?
>

It might be Toto.  

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies