From: launce@apollo.med.utah.edu (Tri-Ungulate)
Subject: It speaks. was Re: without even being asked ....
Organization: Trifurcate-Hooved Ruminant Surveyors, Inc.
	<1992Aug15.195147.7565@csus.edu>
	<LAUNCE.92Aug17161600@apollo.med.utah.edu>
	<1992Aug24.235129.9600@csus.edu>
Date: 25 Aug 92 11:31:07

In article <1992Aug24.235129.9600@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:

    >Was that "Tri-Ungulate" or "Tri Dungulate"? Sounds like you're more of the
    > latter.

My goodness. It has grasped the highly advanced concept of the
"name-flame."  My my, It is a true flamelord indeed.

   >>Nope, not a typo.  Oh dear, speling flames are so bush league.
   >>However, I couldn't resist -- it's so especially amusing when put in
   >>the context of Cheney's "flame".
   >
   >And you can't spell either.

Hook, line, sinker, rod, reel...Oh dear, It is unable to comprehend
simple irony.  Or perhaps It takes umbrage at my misspeling of It's
                                                       ^
 Yes clueless newbie It, I know. Do you understand?____|

name. Not that It matters much, what with It's multiple personalities.
You can call It SteveCheney, or you can call It StephenChaney, or you
can call It DennisHall or you can call It PropellerBoy, or you can
call It OuterSpaceCreatureWannabee and it doesn't make a whit of
difference.  -- But for heaven's sake, don't *ever* call It
intelligent!

   >> Three strikes. You're out.   
   > <GASP> The newest in high-tech flaming!

ATTENTION: Watch closely folks, for the above is true flamelord
artistry at work.  Note the finely crafted attention to detail
inherent in It's cutting, absolutely razor-sharp riposte.

   >>I'm sorry, but punctuated equilibrium does not apply when it comes to
   >>the mental evolution of cretins like yourself. With your feeble
   >>cognitive capacity, you are doomed to remain in the unicellular stage,
   >>floating aimlessly about your fetid cesspool with fellow lozers like
   >>your hero Steve Franklin. Tough break, bud.

   >In other words, I am not much better than you?

Here It returns to It's tried-and-true-tactic of "IKnowYouAreButWhat
AmI?" used to such devastating effect against Novak and dac.  Cower
in terror as It lobs the flameage equivalent of a tactical nuke.

Unfortunately this is It's only recourse as It is unable to fully
fathom the remark sent in It's direction. It obviously needs a simpler
encapsulation of the aforementioned remark so it may become more
pellucid in It's tiny, dense, pitiful excuse for a brain.

In other words, you're an Idjit [tm]. Got it this time? Tough break
bud.

===============================================================================
   Question: 	If you don't have truck bombs and thousands of
		fanatics to sacrifice their lives and drive them, how
		do you scare a nation into giving in to your demands?

   Answer: 	Use hysterical coercive confrontational tactics at
		family-planning clinics to force women to submit to
		your personal ideas of FundamentalMoralPurity. Plus, a
		firebomb or two here or there can be useful for
		intimidation purposes. Oh yeah, cloak youself in
		meaningless hypocritical terms like "pro-life" or
		"family values" and you're set.
 
-- ung^3
-- non-mu


Newsgroups: talk.abortion