HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.flame
Subject: Re: check THIS guy out
Date: 5 Nov 92 22:33:55 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1992Nov5.173736.20522@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE, BUTT-CHEESE.

>BUSH LOST. He lost in the popular vote, he lost in the electoral vote,
>he lost in the east, and he lost in the west. bush will no longer be
>president in two short months.

He didn't lose in Texas ;-)  Maybe we'll secede and make him OUR President.

Get rid of Ann Richards NOW!
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 PEROT IN '96!

  - Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
    exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org  <SLOW!>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: john@anasazi.com (John R. Moore)
Subject: Re: Individual rights Re: Mr. Waffle King
Reply-To: john@anasazi.com
Organization: Anasazi Inc, Phoenix AZ USA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 05:06:21 GMT

Keywords: 

In article <QKSSB3P6@cc.swarthmore.edu> mwertz1@cc.swarthmore.edu (Melanie Wertz) writes:
]
]Conservatives give you rights if you are
]a) wealthy
]b) Christian 
]c) white
]d) heterosexual
]e)
]male

Sometimes the amount of repetitive idiocy by the left amazes me. Above
we have an example of someone who obviously has fallen for the most
vulgar characterizations and mouths them here as gospel. This idiot
probably also is using taxpayer funds to soak up a sorry excuse
for an education at some liberal arts school.

Sigh.



-- 
John Moore NJ7E, 7525 Clearwater Pkwy, Scottsdale, AZ 85253  (602-951-9326)
john@anasazi.com ncar!noao!asuvax!anasaz!john anasaz!john@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
- Democracy is two wolves and a sheep using majority vote to decide what -
- to have for dinner. SUPPORT THE BILL OF RIGHTS - INCLUDING THE 2nd! -
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush
From: denebeim@brtph254.bnr.ca (Jay Denebeim P025)
Subject: Re: Clinton wins in LANDSLIDE
Organization: :-)
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 00:54:35 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.235550.11214@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> cah@pavonis.JPL.NASA.gov (Allen Halsell) writes:
>You mean on how to destroy the economy and health of a nation ruled
>by a dictator, causing intense suffering within the population, and
>yet _still_ leave the dictator in place?  

Don't you think that's a little harsh?  I don't think its fair to call
Bush a dictator unless he refuses to leave office in January.

OHHHH... You ment Saddam Hussain?  Whoops, never mind...

-- 
Jay Denebeim     Address: UUCP:     duke!wolves!deepthot!jay
                          Internet: jay@deepthot.cary.nc.us
                 BBS:(919)-460-7430      VOICE:(919)-460-6934
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: rjwade@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Robert J. Wade)
Subject: Re: Na na, na na na na, Hey hey hey , good bye
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 20:37:08 GMT

In article <LARRY.92Nov5141107@boris.webo.dg.com> larry@boris.webo.dg.com (Larry Rogers) writes:
>
>
>By the way, Clinton is already having an affect.  In the past month,
>home mortgage interest rates are up nearly a point.  That'll cost us
>more than Perot's gas tax.  The home owner/buyer takes it on the chin
>again.
>
>Larry

give me a break...rates were going up no matter who won...since he won rates
are the same in my town.  they had gone up about .5% in the previous month...
for whatever random reason.  things are not as simple as you want them to
be in your little world larry.  and those of us who bought months ago are not
hurt at all.

Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush
From: freshlt@quig16.alleg.edu (Timothy Freshly)
Subject: Re: 10th Amendment (Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh)
Organization: Allegheny College
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 02:33:56 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.143545.23836@hemlock.cray.com>  
rja@mahogany126.cray.com (Russ Anderson) writes:
[stuff deleted]
> Does anyone know where the Constitution gives the Federal goverment
> the power to wage a "War on Drugs"?
> 
> Just wondering...
> 
> -- 
> Russ Anderson    |  Disclaimer: Any statements are my own and do not  
reflect
> ------------------              upon my employer or anyone else.  (c)  
1992
> EX-Twins' Jack Morris, 10 innings pitched, 0 runs (World Series MVP!)


	The "Necessary and Proper" clause of the Constitution would  
probably be used as justification of a policy such as the War on Drugs.


			Tim
From: paul@hsh.com
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: check THIS guy out
Date: 5 Nov 92 22:42:10 GMT
 <1992Nov5.055121.23017@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> 
 <1992Nov5.160729.6468@klaava.Helsinki.FI> <1992Nov5.173736.20522@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Organization: HSH Associates

In article <1992Nov5.173736.20522@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
> 
>> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>>>Too bad that the U.S. political system failed and allowed Slick Willie & Al
>>>to become elected, after all, in the the popular vote, not the electoral
>>>vote, President Bush and VP Quayle WON this election!
> 
> WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU SMOKIN, HOSS? 
> 
> Define won, dickweed.
> 
> WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE, BUTT-CHEESE.

Gee, what intelligent repartee.  What biting, insightful views.  What 
breathless logic.  What a fool.

------

 Paul Havemann, VP          HSH Associates            (201) 838-3330 
 Internet: paul@hsh.com     Compuserve: 70410,3507    AOL: HSH Assoc
 "Any opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the company."
Xref: sparky alt.politics.bush:13626 alt.politics.clinton:16613 alt.rush-limbaugh:9336
From: rjwade@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Robert J. Wade)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: bush supporter blatherings...
Date: 9 Nov 92 20:40:51 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network


oh no, clinton won last week and it got cold and i had to turn my furnace on
and i went to the store and canned peas are up $.02, wow...hold onto your
wallets....

relax folks, clinton has not even been sworn in yet.
Xref: sparky alt.politics.bush:13466 alt.politics.clinton:16326 alt.politics.elections:23045
From: niepornt@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Marc Nieporent)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections
Subject: Re: Its official: Clinton wins
Keywords: Clinton wins the presidency
Date: 7 Nov 92 07:20:13 GMT
Organization: Princeton University
Originator: news@nimaster

In article <1992Nov6.152452.28662@risky.ecs.umass.edu> giovin@medr3.ecs.umass.edu (Rocky J Giovinazzo) writes:
>In article <1992Nov5.161409.18390@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>>In article <5NOV199201422020@vxcrna.cern.ch> casper@vxcrna.cern.ch (CASPER,DAVI./PPE) writes:

>>>A business-as-usual, incumbent-dominated liberal Congress (willing to keep
>>>sending him spending bills to carry out his little social experiments and keep 
>>>themselves rolling in the pork and tax bills to pay the tab at our expense)
>>>and his rubber stamp is the only mandate Slickness needs.

>>>Who cares about a mandate indeed.  Everybody agrees now (no more divided
>>>government, remember?)  The Slick One wants to spend your money and Congress
>>>wants to spend your money.  Get the picture?

>>George Bush was pretty fucking good at spending our money too.

>>When was the last time a republican president submitted a balanced budget?

>	It's too bad the Democratic Congress refuses to pass the 
>Balanced Budget Ammendent which the president just happens to support
>and who just happens to be a Republican. PLEASE!

They support it because they know it won't apply to them.  Bush's
balanced budget amendment would have taken effect in *5* years.
Convenient, huh?

If they were in favor of balanced budgets, they'd submit balanced
budgets, and only sign balanced budgets.  Not some cheap political trick
and budgetary gimmick.

-- 
David M. Nieporent   | Mike Mussina 1992 AL Cy Young Winner
niepornt@phoenix.    |------------------------------------ 
   princeton.edu     | "I still believe in a place called Hope."
Clinton/Gore '92.  Don't stop thinking about tomorrow.
Xref: sparky alt.politics.bush:13452 alt.politics.clinton:16296 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8119 alt.rush-limbaugh:9200
From: marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Marc Rassbach)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Mr. Waffle King (the Dodger)
Date: 7 Nov 1992 06:25:11 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Department MSCS
NNTP-Posting-Host: studsys.mscs.mu.edu

In article <1992Nov5.224301.15140@athena.cs.uga.edu> tedr@athena.cs.uga.edu (Ted Kalivoda) writes:
>Well David, you must not have heard Rush, but I believe it is the case that
>an ABC exit poll show that 67% of those who voted for Clinton said they
>wanted fewer taxes and less government.  If this is true, then your splendid
>logical deduction unfortunately leaves the American public in ugly
>contradiction, which,  unfortunately again, shows that people voted against
>Bush, for any kind of change, and NOT on the issues.

Let's say the "issues" were less taxes and less government.

Please answer how the ACTIONS taken by the Bush administration follow this
with:
1) large % increase in white house staff
2) "read my lips no new taxes"

If the "issue" was less taxes and less government then why did the 
Libertarians NOT win?  I will maintain there is little differance between
Rebublicans and the Democrats in the big picture of things.  Big Govn.
assures their survival.  And big gonv takes big $$$ to run.
  
>Now, why don't we here the prime time media mention these points?

What points?  No real FUNCTIONAL differance between Republicans and
Democrats?  No real "issues" in the campaign?



-- 
Marc Rassbach    marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu    If you take my advice, that
MS-DOS - it's not   marc@milestn.mil.wi.us    is your problem, not mine!
my problem!     If it was said on UseNet, it must be true.
   Unix - It's a nice place to live, but you don't want to visit there.
Xref: sparky alt.politics.bush:13551 alt.politics.clinton:16460 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8188 alt.rush-limbaugh:9256
From: kmitche@eis.calstate.edu (Kenneth Mitchell)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Mr. Waffle King (the Dodger)
Date: 8 Nov 92 19:02:26 GMT
Organization: Calif State Univ/Electronic Information Services

crosmun@crosmun.rtp.dg.com (William Crosmun) writes:
> 
> What exactly can the rich do with their money that would be BAD for the
> economy?  If they spend it they provide jobs for those who produce what is
> bought.  If they save it they provide capital to others to produce.  The only
> BAD thing I can think of is to bury their money in the back yard and I suspect
> that they wouldn't be rich if they did this.
> 

For every action that IS taken, there are other actions that are NOT
taken, which may in fact be mutually incompatible.  In Econ 101, this is
called "Opportunity Costs"; that is, what you GAVE UP doing to do what you
actually did. In the majority of cases, what the "rich" do with their
money that's "bad" for the economy is measured in opportunity costs; i.e.,
lost opportunities to do better. Most investments in tax-free government
bonds fall into this category. For example, most bond issues that support
"municipal transit systems" (such as "light rail")  pay a tiny fraction of
their take toward capital improvements, and many of the capital
improvements, while very nice, end up being underutilized and
unproductive. 

One thing that the "rich" can do that REALLY IS BAD for the economy is to
invest in FOREIGN GOVERNMENT bonds, thereby stimulating what little
capital spending they do create in other nations rather than here at home.
With European interest rates so high right now, that's a real temptation;
of course, it's also a gamble that those foreign currencies won't be
devalued relative to the dollar. 

> 
> ===============================================================================
> "The whole idea of our government is this: If enough people get together and
>  act in concert, they can take something and not pay for it."
> 			  
>                                       P.J. O'Rourke - A Parliament of Whores
> ===============================================================================

Precisely.

Ken Mitchell
kmitche@eis.calstate.edu
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: No Liberals here! (was Re: Hey! Now It's ALL CLINTON's Fault!)
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 23:28:52 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.192448.16136@odin.corp.sgi.com>, archer@elysium.esd.sgi.com (Archer Sully) writes:
> There hasn't been a real leftist involved in presidential politics since
> Eugene Debs.

Oh yeah right! Yeah, George McGovern was as right as Barry Goldwater! Tom
Harkin? Closet Conservative. McCarthy? A war monger. Jerry Brown? Completely
rational. Roosevelt? He really loved free- for-all. Long? Damn that bullet! He
would have imposed free trade. Jessie Jackson? Defender of traditional American
Values. Mickey " Sec. of Defense" Dukakis? "No taxes here!" Mondale? He lied
when he said that he would raise taxes. Babbitt? Business over the envionment!
Al "I love capitalism" Gore. 

Nope. No Liberals here!
Disclaimers. Disclaimers.
---------
Do you hear the people sing?
 Singing the song of Angry men?
It is the Music of a people who will not be slaves again!
----------
		That Vince guy.
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections
From: Terri Buchman <buchman@osf.org>
Subject: Re: Just for a moment
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A71EB412E0010832@alimac40.osf.org>
X-Xxdate: Thu, 5 Nov 92 11:20:50 GMT
Organization: Open Software Foundation
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 16:20:40 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.043058.27801@news.columbia.edu> Elizabeth G.
Levy, egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu writes:
>Oh, Vince, we really do want you folks as a Loyal Opposition: talk
>about running off to other countries from some others on your side
of
>the aisle avoids a certain responsibility in our form of Government.
>You're supposed to keep our hubris in check, much as we've tried the
>same with yours over the past decade or so.

I can remember saying that I wanted to move out of the country when
Reagan was elected.  It is very painful to see someone that you have
worked for lose, but that doesn't give anyone an excuse to give up. 
I know how ugly a loss of this magnitude can be and it sure ain't
fun or pretty.  Good luck!!  The dems winning this year proves the
value of keeping your eyes on the prize and not giving up.  

Those who disagree with Mr. Clinton's policies have a moral
responsibility to the country to make those views known.  The
republic is not served by scyophants who never challenge those in
power.  America needs people who stand and think on their own and
question the status quo.  I would hope the the Republicans can take
some time to figure out what happened and begin to heal the wounds
of their own party.   They can then begin to formulate new ideas and
policies that will contribute to the level of debate in this
country.  

TerriB.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party.  I'm a democrat"
     Will Rogers
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: swarren@convex.com (Steve Warren)
Subject: Re: Mr. Waffle King (the Dodger)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 20:30:18 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In article <YOUNG.92Nov11132333@ssdd475a.erim.org> young@ssdd475a.erim.org (Peter Young) writes:
>In article <BxIIH1.J98@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu (Greg Trotter) writes:
>
>>   A sincere tax break on dividends is always a good idea. But a healthy,
>>   trading stock market also helps.
>
>Ok, now I still need some clarification.  (By the way, I don't think
>you answered either of my earlier questions, but that can wait.)
>
>A healthy, trading stock market only provides investment to businesses
>that are issuing new stocks.  The stock markets in this country are
>overwhelmingly trading in previously issued stocks.  The trading
>provides absolutely nothing to the issuer.  Where does the investment

But all businesses need to issue new stocks occassionally; this is
a key component for most businesses to remain capitalised.  If they
cannot get capital they will die.  It may take six weeks or six years;
it depends on the financial condition of the company.

The stock market gives buyers a place to market their shares if they
later tire of them.  The market exists for the investors.  The investors
make possible the continued capitalisation of new and existing businesses.
So if you want healthy businesses then you need a healthy market.

-- 
            _.
--Steve   ._||__    Welcome to the World's First GaAs Supercomputer
  Warren   v\ *|    -----------------------------------------------
             V
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: tedr@athena.cs.uga.edu (Ted Kalivoda)
Subject: What's the deal?
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 22:42:49 GMT

I just got this message while spinning through my rn file:

End of newsgroup rec.pets.herp.
Warning!  Bogus newsgroup: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Checking out your .newsrc--hang on a second...
Moving bogus newsgroups to the end of your .newsrc.
Delete bogus newsgroups? [ny]

I then said no and it was still deleted, then could no longer subscribe.  I
suppose there was a decision to consolidate the two groups?  Or, is some
system ad. playing a joke on me?

Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: treilly@iastate.edu (Edward C Reilly)
Subject: Re: Ozone Man's Theme song
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 05:31:04 GMT

In <1992Nov6.020950.60451@cc.usu.edu> sl930@cc.usu.edu writes:


>Sung to the tune of "Nowhere Man" with extreme apologies to the Beatles:

>He's a real Ozone Man,
>Living in his Ozone land,
>making all his nowhere plans
>for nobody.

    Interesting that someone from Utah would write this blather, given
the quality of the air in Salt Lake City.  
    Wake up, and look at what your state is breathing!  



Xref: sparky alt.politics.bush:13565 alt.rush-limbaugh:9268 alt.news-media:1602 talk.politics.misc:59023 alt.politics.elections:23165
From: eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.news-media,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.elections
Subject: Headline Chasers: Presidential Elections
Summary: A little game I will play with you all
Keywords: Headline Chasers: the Presidential Elections game
Date: 9 Nov 92 02:28:02 GMT
Followup-To: alt.politics.bush
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

As another "relaxing" event for all of you, let's play
"Headline Chasers." The subject for this thread is about the
Presidential Elections. Go back to the 1980 election (I didn't but if
you can help me, that'll be great!) and record what the front-page
headline was at that time.

Example:
WASHINGTON _POST_
Wed Nov 04 84: Reagan Wins Reelection in Landslide, Largest Electoral
College Total Ever
	Subtitle: Victory Shows Broad Appeal Of President. Article
begins: Ronald Wilson Reagan won a landslide reelection victory as
President of the United States yesterday, gaining a mandate for
continuation of his conservative policies from voters all across
America.

Wed Nov 09 88: Bush Elected 41st President by Large Margin As Democrats
Retain Dominance in Congress
	Subtitle: GOP Loses Ground in Governorships. Article begins:
George Herbert Walker Bush, campaigning on the peace and prosperity of
the Reagan era, yesterday was elected President of the United States.

Wed Nov 04 92: Clinton Elected 42nd President in Sweeping Victory Over
Bush

You get the drift?

If you want to discuss any of these headline comparisons, please change
the Subject: line appropriately.

My favorite is this one:

_USA TODAY_
Wed Nov 04 84: THERE HE GOES AGAIN Reagan off to 2nd term in 49-state
sweep. [Side article: "Congress: Coattails too short"]
	Article begins: "President Ronald Reagan won re-election Tuesday
in a landslide of historic proportions, but his impressive personal win
fell short of realigning the balance of power in Congress."

Wed Nov 09 88: Bush: 'We'll move again' (subtitle: Reaches out to
Congress).
	Article begins: "George Bush was elected the 41st President of
the United States Tuesday by a large margin -- but without the mandate
enjoyed by Ronald Reagan."

And of course, Wed Nov 04 92: LANDSLIDE


Finally:
Los Angeles _Times_
Wed Nov 07 84: 49-State Reagan Triumph (Lottery Wins; Jarvis, Remapping
Lose) Subtitles: * GOP Gains in House, Keeps Senate Lead; * President
Draws 59% of Vote in Landslide

Wed Nov 09 88: Bush Wins, Vows to Seek Unity (Democrats Keep Grip on
Congress; Wilson Reelected)

Wed Nov 04 92: ??? (The Duke Library does not yet have this issue.)
-- 
Emil Thomas Chuck	eyc@acpub.duke.edu	Biomedical Engineering 1993
	THANK GOD IT'S BASKETBALL SEASON!!!!!
I don't have to have a 4.0 GPA to succeed in life because I'm 
good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me.
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections,talk.politics.misc
From: joec@fid.morgan.com (Joe Collins)
Subject: None
Organization: None
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 15:58:26 GMT

In article <adams.720914090@spssig> adams@spss.com (Steve Adams) writes:
>jmk@cbnews.cb.att.com (joseph.m.knapp) writes:
>
>>Exit polling shows that over 50% of voters are excited about the prospect
>>of a Clinton presidency. This includes 20% of Bush voters (source: USA
>>Today 11/4). Give it up. Sixty percent of voters said that whatever
>>Bush was doing, please stop it. We will, and that is Clinton's mandate.
>
>And 60% said either Bush or Perot is better than Clinton.  No mandate.
>
> -Steve

And the Democrats lost ground in Congress as well - the Congress may in
fact be MORE conservative now.

Democratic NY Governor CUOMO also lost face when he personally inserted 
himself in a campaign to have NY voters pass an $800million bond act to 
fund an infrastructure building project in NY state - The voters soundly 
rejected it. CUOMO also backed his attorney general for the NY senate 
seat - Republican incumbent D'Amato won that seat (in a tight election)
even though Clinton beat Bush by 16% in NY.

The only mandate I see is for Change - not for any group or beliefs,
just change - in the economy, in politics, in elections, etc
Again, CLINTON and Democrats do NOT have a mandate....Only the people
do because they voted for change.

Joe
joec@morgan.com

Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: What happened to ???
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 05:32:37 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.001628.25917@welchgate.welch.jhu.edu> davidk@welch.jhu.edu writes:
>Does anyone know what happened to Mz. Fitzgerald, the woman that G. Bush had an 
>affair with?  I had heard something a while ago and forgot all about it until
>a friend of mine asked.  So I will ask you all, Anyone knows where she went?

Heh, heh.  She'll be on the unemployment line in about 72 days.



And gentlemen in England now abed
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speak
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day.	   [Henry V, 4.3]
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush