HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: leisti@cc.helsinki.fi (Teemu Leisti)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Does anyone have Transcript of today's CNN Interviev
Date: 21 Aug 92 21:23:33 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki

cindy@solan10.solan.unit.no (Cynthia Kandolf) writes:

> If he is interested in sports, however, i hope he has the sense to
> stay away from Lillehammer in '94.  After his behavior at King Olav's
> funeral, he can hardly expect a warm reception....

Why, what did he do?

And has he really talked about "restoring democracy to Iceland?"  (The
country with the oldest parliament in the world.)  Oh, Danny, Danny,
Danny.

--  Teemu Leisti  /  U. of Helsinki, Finland  /  leisti@cc.helsinki.fi

        "All my life, I wanted to be somebody."    -- Anonymous
From: rone@girtab.usc.edu (Ron Echeverri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: AN ANAGRAM!!! WE HAVE ONE!!!
Date: 16 Aug 1992 18:18:52 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: girtab.usc.edu

In article <hmiller.714003387@lucpul.it.luc.edu> hmiller@lucpul.it.luc.edu (Hugh Miller) writes:
>    My favorite is:
>    VICE PRESIDENT DAN QUAYLE = CRADLED QUITE A PENIS ENVY.

All of you send Mr. Miller a nice thankyou email note.

5150
oh joy oh joy
From: labc-1ad@e260-3g.berkeley.edu (Eric van Bezooijen)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Announcing Quayletool V1.0!
Date: 18 Aug 1992 00:03:06 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berzerkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: e260-3g.berkeley.edu

Yes folks! It has finally arrived! The complete tool to go along with our
VP.  Features :

	o Dozens of quotations from Dan-o
	o You can have a different quote come up every 2 minutes (or every
	  second, or every day, whatever you want)
	o A picture of Dan Quayle
	o When you press "talk" his mouth moves and reads of the quotes!
	o Sorry, no sound :-(
	o You can edit Danny's picture (draw Moustaches, change hair-do), etc.
	
NOTE : THIS WILL ONLY WORK ON SYSTEMS RUNNING OLIT & OPENLOOK

Quayletool V1.0 is available from soda.berkeley.edu by anonymous ftp.
Look for the directory : ~ftp/pub/quayletool.
This is a public domain program

Mail complaints, bugs, suggestions, etc., to :

	eric@soda.berkeley.edu

Enjoy !

-- 
"And do you know what's inside ? A priiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiize !" - Stimpy
"You gave away ... FORTY-SEVEN MILLION DOLLARS ?" - Ren Hoek
Ren & Stimpy: On Nickolodeon,Sunday mornings @ 11 AM.  Watch it, you eediot !
Eric van Bezooijen - eric@soda.berkeley.edu, evb@logrus.eng.sun.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: stupid, blood sucking media
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 15:29:04 GMT

In article <1992Aug12.195325.29127@lsil.com> mitch@lsil.com writes:
>In article JBw@scd.hp.com, dianem@boi.hp.com (Diane Mathews) writes:
>>I thought that it had become common knowledge that Bush was more of a
>>womanizer than Clinton had ever dreamed of being...  I'm afraid that I
>
>Actually, it's well publicized in the August issue of Spy Magazine.
>It includes the 1000 reasons why not to vote for Bush.  #1 is that
>he cheats on his wife.

Why should this be the #1 reason not to vote for Bush when we can
think of so many more that are far more serious?



--
This is not a .signature
From: narsi@sgi.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: who's the greatest veep of 'em all?
Date: 21 Aug 92 19:01:50 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.


BTW, during the roll-call for the nomination process, somebody
(the texas delegation chair, i believe) said:
blah-blah . . . I nominate blah-blah . . .
the greatest President of ALL time & my friend,
and the greatest Vice-President of ALL time.
(I just cracked up :-)

so that means
Dan E. Quayle > George H.W. Bush > Ronald Reagan

(They don't mind insulting their own, do they?)
On second thoughts, the statement might be actually right . . .
oh, never mind.

-----
narsi

M. Quayle: ". . . not everyone dodged the draft . . ."
Hohohoho hee-hee haw-haw ho-ho-ho <cough, gasp>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Apology and Reagan quotes
Date: 19 Aug 92 23:03:50 EDT
Distribution: alt.fan.dan-quayle

In article <1992Aug19.180503.21164@usho93.hou281.chevron.com>, jviv@usmi01.midland.chevron.com (John Viveiros) writes:
>    Ok I have to apologize for putting my abortion reply on a.f.dq.  I
> should know better. 
> 
>     On the other hand, I think the following does belong on the alt.fan.
> republican-gaffes (which is what this group seems to really be).  
>     All the stuff that Reagan said that was "so eloquently stated by
> Abraham Lincoln" was written 40 years after his death by a minister from
> Erie PA...kind of a 'this is what Abe would have said if he were as
> smart as me!' type of thing.  (See definition of fanatic wandering
> around the network).  The interesting thing is that he left out two of
> the supposed Lincoln quotes:  "You cannot keep out of trouble by
> spending more than your income" and "You cannot establish sound security
> on borrowed money."  I guess he didn't really understand those two :-).
> -- 
> John Viveiros     (jviv@chevron.com)
> Chevron USA        Standard disclaimer applies
> Midland TX 

How about the cliche "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and
all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people
all of the time."

-Garrett



Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: Got my Mojo workin' (was Re: Dan Quayle)
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 13:25:09 GMT

Abner J. Mintz writes:

>Dan Quayle is the Anti-Elvis.
>Michael J. Fox is the Anti-Elvis.
>Q.E.D., Dan Quayle is Michael J. Fox!
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Hmmm...when Michael J. guest-hosted on Saturday Night Live a year or two
back, he appeared briefly in the opening sketch as JDQ...

COINCIDENCE???

I think not!

:-) :-) :-)

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
From: jsa5+@andrew.cmu.edu (Joshua M. Sabloff)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Convention Speeches
Date: 19 Aug 92 14:15:33 GMT
	<1992Aug19.131027.25634@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Information Networking Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Excerpts from netnews.alt.fan.dan-quayle: 19-Aug-92 Re: Convention
Speeches Alex Bunker@physun.physi (915)

> Does ANYONE have a copy of Buchanans speech. I have heard a lot about 
> it and want to see it, it should be good for a laugh.

Laugh, hell.  I almost threw up.  I blame the past few days' indigestion
on that right-wing bigot.

:-)


-Josh Sabloff (jsa5@andrew.cmu.edu)
"Now go away before I taunt you a second time-a!"
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: ronwill@sierra.sim.es.com (Ron Williams)
Subject: Re: The paths of the master
Reply-To: ronwill@sierra.sim.es.com (Ron Williams)
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp., Salt Lake City, UT
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 21:20:14 GMT

In article <1992Aug18.150151.28556@news.uiowa.edu>, williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams) writes:

> Listen bud, I live in Iowa.  I TELL people I live in a barren, featureless
> prairie so they'll stay the hell away.  Just like the people in the Pacific
> NorthWest will tell you it always rains.
> 
Hey, great idea!!  Ok all you damn Californians.  Utah is a barren, featureless desert.
Stay the hell away.

-- 
Ron Williams
ronwill@sierra.sim.es.com
Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp.
Salt Lake City, UT

	Utah - the state that wants to put a Pizza Hut in the
 	middle of Zion National Park.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bender@riscee.pko.dec.com (Patricia Bender)
Subject: Mild Humor 
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard MA
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 13:13:47 GMT

From an old episode of Night Court:

Background: a man had been holding onto one of the giant 
balloons in Macy's Thanksgiving parade when the balloon
took off with him still hanging onto the rope.
His description of how he came back to the ground went 
something like: the Airforce mistook the balloon for
a Mig and shot it down, he bounced of a building, went
through a large business sale sign, landed on a bus,
the bus took a sharp turn and he flew into a bed of
flowers, which was what broke his fall.

Harry: "You must be the luckiest man alive!"

Man: "No, Dan Quayle is."



patricia
From: Joe.Francis@dartmouth.edu (Joe Francis)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle for President
Date: 13 Aug 92 22:17:58 GMT
 <1992Aug6.033424.22428@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>  
 <1992Aug12.201724.1022@panix.com>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0d55@newshost.dartmouth.edu

>>> Doesn't the credit for this particular boner go to Earl Butz, Gerald Ford's
>>> Secretary of Agriculture [...]    [pat walsh]

>>Yes, Earl Butz was Mr. "Loose Shoes".  I had thought that he was Ag Sec
>>for Nixon, but you're probably correct.  [Joe Francis]

> Nope, Butz was Carter's AgSec.  [Mark Eckenwiler]

Actually, both Pat Walsh and I are correct, and you are wrong.  Earl L.
Butz was Secretary of Agriculture from 1971 to 1976.  Hence, he was
Secretary of Agriculture for both Nixon and Ford, but not Carter. 
Robert S. Bergland was Carter's Secretary of Agriculture.  At least,
that's what the online "Academic American Encyclopedia" tells me.  Do
you believe it is incorrect?

Apologies to alt.fan.dan.quaylers for the bandwidth;  I prefer to
correct errors where they occur.
From: rsk@aspen.circ.upenn.edu (Rich Kulawiec)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The paths of the master
Summary: Where Dan Quayle once trod
Date: 17 Aug 92 20:40:07 GMT
Organization: Cardiothoracic Imaging Research Center

In article <1992Aug17.190755.21723@javelin.sim.es.com> ronwill@sierra.sim.es.com (Ron Williams) writes:
>Oh, and I take issue with you calling Indiana a barren, featureless paririe.  I
>thought it was very pretty -- at least the country.  The cities were ugly as hell.

Now, I would be the last one to defend Indiana, as I've spent several
years torturing my Hoosier friends over the awful circumstance that caused
DQ to be from Huntington, Indiana...but I will say that the southern
part of the state is exceptionally pretty in the fall.  While it's not
as impressive as, say, the Ozarks, there are a lot of rolling hills,
covered bridges, and streams that make bicycle touring very attractive.

Now, then...Fort Wayne...South Bend...Indianapolis...are nothing to
write home about.  West Lafayette and Bloomington are somewhat better,
although Purdue is doing their best to make the campus look like
an industrial park.  IU's campus still looks like a campus, much
to the credit of whoever is handling their architectural design.
One of the prettier towns may be Greencastle (site of Depauw U.).

If you are stuck in Indy, I recommend the Broad Ripple area: it's
reasonably nice, has a lot of good restaurants and bars and shops,
and is easy to get to.  If you're stuck in Huntington, I recommend
tranquilizers and scrabble.

---Rsk
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:2550 alt.politics.bush:1838 alt.politics.clinton:2067
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: The Republicans are confusing me again...
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 08:47:21 CDT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS, New Orleans, LA

thyat@sdf.lonestar.org (Tom Hyatt) writes:

> >Just because he's speaking doesn't mean he's speaking on pro-choice
> >issues. Last newspaper article I read said the Republicans for Choice
> >had asked to have the issue of whether the support for an anti-abortion
> >amendment ought to be removed from the platform discussed at the convention,
> >and were told sorry, no, just forget about it.
> >
>
>
> I was asking a couple Republican friends if they would be duplicating the
> mistake that the powers-that-be at the Democratic convention made by literall
> censoring Gov. Casey and his followers.  The answer that they gave was that
> they were fairly sure that opposing viewpoints would be allowed on the floor.
> In seeing this, I say that both parties are making bigtime errors.
>

The Demos have made a very calculated decision, namely that there are more
pro-choice single-issue voters than there are pro-life single-issue voters.
They've decided that they have a good shot at getting those folks to vote
Democrat, and they don't want anything to mess that up.  It may be censorship,
but Casey will be the better for it politically if Clinton gets into the White
House.

As to whether or not the GOP pro-choicers will be allowed their opinions, I'll
believe it when I hear it later in the week...

> On a similar note:  I was wondering exactly *when* each of the national party
> conventions became a week-long coronation party for each side's candidate?
> I seem to remember (as recently as 1984) situations of really invigorating
> floor fights over various platform planks.  Nowadays I seem to only see the
> drumbeating of each "established" party platform, with very little _REAL_
> drama involved.  I wonder if the delagates realized how much they have actual
> been taken out of the loop.
>

As the primaries take away the lustre of the convention in terms of the
nomination process, we'll see more and more coronations.  Since '76,
conventions have either been the scenes of coronations or of fratricide.  The
'84 Dem convention is an exception because the candidiates were such jokes that
there was little hope that any of them could beat Reagan.  That meant the Dems
could spend more time arguing principles, since they just about knew they were
going to lose the big one.  If the Republicans actually allow a floor fight on
abortion tonight, that would make for interesting debate, but I can't see it
happening.  They're down too far, and don't need that kind of grief.



|Edward J. Branley                         elendil@mintir.New-Orleans.LA.US|
|Seashell Software                                UUCP:  rex!mintir!elendil|
|3508 North Woodlawn Avenue                          Compu$erve: 71237,2227|
|Metairie, LA   70006       voice: +1-504-455-5087     bbs: +1-504-455-8665|
From: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle for President
Date: 18 Aug 92 18:43:37 GMT
Reply-To: weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P Wiener)
Organization: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology
In-reply-to: sysmatt@aix3090b.uky.edu (Matt Simpson)

In article <sysmatt.714125121@aix3090b.uky.edu>, sysmatt@aix3090b (Matt Simpson) writes:
> Version 1 -- delicately paraphrased:
>  comfortable shoes, good sex, and a warm place to go to the bathroom

Version 0 was the New York Times.  I recall that they did not even give
a cleaned-up summary of the joke, but abstracted it down to "derogatory,
defamatory, and obscene" or some equally waffled triplet.
-- 
-Matthew P Wiener (weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu) "[George Bush] is a man
 who was born on third base and thinks he hit a triple." --Jim Hightower
From: zaccone@rigel.cs.bucknell.edu (Rick Zaccone)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Yet another Quayle Quote
Date: 22 Aug 92 12:37:06 GMT
Reply-To: zaccone@bucknell.edu
Organization: Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pa.

I haven't seen this posted yet, so here is another Quayle quote

An article titled "A Vice President Who Has Been Severely Tested" in
Friday August 21, 1992 New York Times (City Edition) page A11 contains
the following quote on term limits:

    This is not a bipartisan issue because Democrats, Republicans and
    independents support term limitations.

Rick Zaccone

--
zaccone@bucknell.edu

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: murthy@aslws01.asl.dl.nec.com (Vasudev Murthy)
Subject: Dave Barry on Dan Quayle
Organization: NEC America, Inc. Irving, Texas
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 20:03:31 GMT

USA Today August 20 1992 Page 13A

Dave Barry on Dan Quayle

Quayle is very popular with the folks who attended the
God and Country rally. They belong to the Christian
Coalition, an organization headed by the Extremely Rev.
Pat Robertson. Coalition members are strongly in favor
of Family Values, as long as they get to pick the
family. They are not at all fond of the press, which
has gone out of its way to make the vice president look
stupid via such godless tactics as printing what he
says.
-- 
Vasudev Murthy             Any opinions expressed are strictly  
murthy@asl.dl.nec.com      my own  and have nothing to do with
(214) 518-5031             Advanced Switching Lab, NEC America, Inc.
1525 Walnut Hill Lane Irving TX 75038
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: cortez@milton.u.washington.edu (Tom Warner)
Subject: Re: The Republicans are confusing me again...
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 10:25:24 GMT

In article <1992Aug13.050031.7745@athena.mit.edu> howie@athena.mit.edu (Howard D Lewis) writes:
>In article <1992Aug13.034255.3899@athena.mit.edu> dks@athena.mit.edu (dks) writes:
>>
>>Friends!
>>
>>It's happening again: Republican logic is once more too much for my
>>feeble mind.  
>>
>>When anti-choice Democratic Governor Casey and his fellow believers
>>were not given a chance to speak at the Democratic Convention last
>>month, we were told that the Democrats were afraid to face the issue.
>>Never mind that the anti-choice movement subsumed only about fifteen
>>percent of the delegates elected to the Democratic Convention, they
>>should have been given a chance to speak out, we were told.
>>
>>[Cut to Houston, barely a month later.]
>>
>>The Republican platform now calls for a Constitutional Amendment that
>>would ban *all* abortions, even in cases of rape and incest.  More
>>than *fifty-five* percent of the delegates elected to the Republican
>>Convention disagree with this position.  How many of these dissenters
>>will be allowed to speak to the Convention?  You guessed it: NONE!
>
>
> Governor Bill Weld of Massachussetts will be speaking at the Republican 
> convention.  He is rather solidly pro-choice.  This is better than
> the Democrats which allowed no one to speak on pro-life issues.
>
>
Just because he's speaking doesn't mean he's speaking on pro-choice
issues. Last newspaper article I read said the Republicans for Choice
had asked to have the issue of whether the support for an anti-abortion
amendment ought to be removed from the platform discussed at the convention,
and were told sorry, no, just forget about it.
From: popec@fennec.sccsi.com (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: GPA
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 92 18:47:04 CST
Organization: Fennec Information Systems, Houston, Texas USA

David Binford, (Aug 15), wants to know about Danny's GPA.  He has utterly 
refused in any way shape or form to let anybody, especially the press or 
anybody even remotly connected with the press have that information.  The 
laws we have know prevent any of his schools or his college to release 
this data without his permission.  We amy never know, alas.  I think we 
can safely say, it is not very high.  Probably he just squeaked by.

----------------
William C. Barwell [popec@fennec.sccsi.com]  //  Pope Charles
Pope Of the Church Of The SubGenius for the Golden Triangle Area
Laughing at everything in the Universe...including the concept of 
laughing at everything in the Universe!
-----------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford)
Subject: Marilyn's "Choice"?
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 19:49:00 GMT

I hope this is the right place for this, as it actually pertains to
Marilyn rather than Danny-boy.

Apparently, Mrs. Danny-boy is going to be making a speech tonight before
the Republican yahoos nominate the two stooges for another 4 yrs.  The
news report I heard this morning said that the speech has been
characterized by <someone high in the Republican party> as a very
pro-family-values-oriented speech.  Marilyn intends to compare herself
to Hillary Clinton, and talk about how Mrs. Danny-boy *also* has a law
degree, but *CHOSE* to do the right thing:  stay home and take care of
all the little Quayls, while Hillary *CHOSE* the "wrong thing" -- actually
putting her education to some use.

I guess the Republican Party feels that it's OK for their wimmenfolk to get
some book-larnin', as long as they shut up about it, and tend the kids and
chickens, or tend the kids and the bridge games (on the other end of the
economic spectrum).  

I'm going to be listening to this speech very carefully.  (I actually had
to turn off Buchanan's speech, I got so angry.)

(Whew!  thanks for letting me vent, and if this isn't the right place for
this, I do apologize.)
-- 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|    /)                      | Lana Mountford    
|   / /  __    ___    __     | Silicon Graphics  
|__(_/__(__)\__/  )__(__)\__ | Mountain View, CA 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bunker@physun.physics.mcmaster.ca (Alex Bunker)
Subject: Re: CNN interview 8/18 w/Danny
Organization: Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, McMaster University
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 20:06:33 GMT

In article <18AUG92.17380485@vax.clarku.edu> mcohen@vax.clarku.edu writes:
>Just sitting here watching some convention BS, when Bernie Shaw did a 15 
>minute interview with our friend Danny.  I wish I taped it.  I was typing in 
>notes while watching it; here are a couple of great highlights.  Mildly 
>paraphrased, but as I said, I was taking notes so it's close...
>
>Bernie asked that if Danny wins in November, will he be "Heir to the 
>throne"?  Danny's response: "Let's get through this election, then we'll talk 
>about 1994"  1996 Dan, not 94!
>
>The rest of it was normal political stuff.
>
>/--------------------------------------------------------------------------\
>|  \  /                                                              \  /  |
>|  /  \               From the Desk and Mind of Mitch                /  \  |
>|   /\                                                                /\   |
>|  \  /                   MCohen@Vax.Clarku.Edu                      \  /  |
>|   \/                                                                \/   |
>|            Any opinions expressed are clearly someone else's!            |
>\__________________________________________________________________________/


AMAZING This guy is a living parody of himself This should be added to the
dan quayle quote file for sure
.
ALEX
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bunker@physun.physics.mcmaster.ca (Alex Bunker)
Subject: Re: Double messages on abortion
Organization: Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, McMaster University
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 15:01:24 GMT

In article <ceZDDo600ioM883kcJ@andrew.cmu.edu> jsa5+@andrew.cmu.edu (Joshua M. Sabloff) writes:
>Excerpts from netnews.alt.fan.dan-quayle: 20-Aug-92 Re: Double messages
>on abor.. Nanci Ann Miller@andrew. (942)
>
>> it's fascinating to imagine
>> somebody Quayle can pick for his running mate who would cause us to say we
>can't impeach Quayle, we'd only get you-know-who.
>
>Ummm...  "Don't kill President Quayle, you'll put Pat Buchannan in office!"
>
><shudder>
>
>-Josh Sabloff (jsa5@andrew.cmu.edu)
>"Now go away before I taunt you a second time-a!"

Well done you win the prize! You actually found the one man who could make
Quayle unimpeachable. I have this unpleasantly clear image inside my
head of a Quayle/Buchanan 96! lawn sign and bumper sticker bedecked with
stars and stripes. If this ticket gets elected I leave the continent!
(Actually I don't think I would be safe ANYwhere on the planet.

Alex
(The social-democratic secualar humanist)