HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: grichard@swimming.cis.ohio-state.edu (Golden Richard III)
Subject: Re: Playoffs: Philly at NewOrleans
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 20:18:48 GMT

In article <1992Dec29.122002.692@totaltec.com> mark@totaltec.com writes:
>In article <258gwB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us>, corleone@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Daniel Marsalone) writes:
>> 
>>      From what I've seen today (Eagles vs. Giants), the Eagles look 
>> pretty weak. Also, the New Orleans offense seems to be non existant.
>> I was just wonderinghow some of you people out side of the New Orleans 
>> area perceive the Saints as a team and their offense in particular.
>>   
>
>Well I'm from the Philly area and I perceive the Saints in general to be a
>bunch of no-nothing,wimp assholes who couldn't play there way out of a wet
>paper bag!!!
>
>GO EAGLES!!!


If Pat Swilling or Ricky Jackson could read news, watch out.   :)



--Golden   [rabid Saints fan and survivor of 20 consecutive Mardi Gras']

-- 
Golden Richard III             OSU Dept. of Computer and Information Science
grichard@cis.ohio-state.edu                                   (614) 292-0056
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dmercer@oracle.com (David Mercer)
Subject: Re: Boston Redskins
Organization: Oracle Corp., Belmont CA
	<1992Dec18.125744.1@cua.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 23:46:22 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
              at Oracle Corporation.  The opinions expressed are those
              of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.

In article <1992Dec18.125744.1@cua.edu> 99siraj@cua.edu (GO! SKINS KILL THE cowboys) writes:

>In article <1992Dec18.134630.28216@relay.nswc.navy.mil>, rweisbe writes:
>> 
>>   I came across an old sports newspaper in my wife's great aunts
>> house a while back. It talked about the Boston Redskins.  Is this
>> the same Washington Redskins of today?   If so how long were they
>> in Boston? Do the Redskins count those Boston years when they speak
>> about how long the team existed or do they count just the Washington
>> years?
>> 
>> Bob

>======================================================================
>The other day I was watching "The greatest moments in NFL"
>hosted by Steve Sabol and he was talking about the Skins. Yes the
>Skins used to be in Boston, "Boston Braves". The team moved to Washington
>in 1937. I don't think they count those years they were in Boston.

This would probably have been back in the days when the Pats played in
Fenway (yes, Fenway).  Red Sox and Patriots were considered
complimentary (AL & AFC), and there was a third Boston team, the
Braves (NL, now in Atlanta).  When Boston acquired another football
team (NFC), they named it the Redskins (now in Washington) to
compliment the Braves.

Also, I believe the 'Skins first coach claimed some Indian blood and
used to turn up to games in warpaint, or something like that.  This,
from the Boston Globe last year when all those Indians protested
against the Redskins.

---DBM
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: aa05@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (ABDULMALIK A. ALHUSSEINI)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: No Cowboys 'D' in Pro Bowl
Date: 29 Dec 92 06:23:10 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1hn93sINNivl@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.e
du (Timothy B. Reynolds) writes:
>It doesn't bother me at all that the Cowboys had no defensive players
>on the Pro-Bowl squad, it's a credit to Dallas rotating 18 players
>in every game to be the #1 NFL defense, it's a team sport. So let the
>other guys go play in the pro-bowl, we will just take our best shot at the
>real prize.
>
>The "Lynch Mob" Defense
>Go Cowboys !!!!
>tim
>
    Agreed.... I doesn't bother me either. Actually It makes feel optimistic
    about how the defense will perform in the playoffs. I think they will play
    harder to earn respect.

    Go Cowboys.....
    Malik..........

    
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: boyd@psych.toronto.edu (Boyd Blackburn)
Subject: NFC bEAST
Organization: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 00:52:58 GMT

Might I be the first to point out that 3 of the 4 remaining NFC teams
come from the same division - the dominant East.

Anyone know how common such an occurrence is?  Or how about how common
getting two into the final four back when there was only one wild card spot?

Boyd
From: barrey@Novell.com (Barrey Jewall)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Ronnie Lott
Date: 30 Dec 92 01:05:14 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Novell, Inc.

In <Bzw8xG.2Ct@mach1.wlu.ca> john7552@mach1.wlu.ca (Niall Johnson u) writes:


>As a 9er fan this is one player I think they goofed on. I was disappointed
>when I heard the 49ers hadn't protected him and the Raiders signed him. Good
>move LA. Its been good to see him continuing to play well, even if not for
>the 9ers.


According to the radio this afternoon, Lott said that he expects to be 
playing for the Niners next year. This heard on KNBR, 680 AM, San Francisco.

Note: KNBR is NOT the 9ers flagship station, that is KGO. KGO hasn't said
word one about it. Sounds like a rumor, but I'm praying!!

Bah

GO NINERS!!!

--
+ Barrey Jewall - Network  Admin.++  and yea, though I walk through the shadow 
+ barrey@novell.com	         ++ of death, I shall fear no evil, for I am
+ Novell, Inc.- San Jose, Calif. ++ the meanest sonofabitch in the valley...
From: joel@cs.utexas.edu (Joel Daniel Just)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Kicker's Index
Date: 1 Jan 1993 01:50:47 -0600
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: langtry.cs.utexas.edu


Hey, all you people who love to devise new stats and ratings, how about
creating a "Kicker's Index."

Currently, kickers are usually rated by number of points scored, or by
percentage of field goals made.
Number of points scored is not a good measure of a kicker's performance because
it doesn't take into account the fact that some kickers get many more extra
point attempts and field goal attempts than others.
Percentage of field goals made is not a good measure because it doesn't take
into account the fact that some kickers try longer field goal attempts than
others.

The "Kicker's Index" should give a lot of credit for long field goals made,
while also not counting off too much for long field goals missed.
Also, short field goals made shouldn't increase a kicker's score very much,
but short field goals missed should hurt a kicker's score a lot.

Extra points could also be counted, but these would need to be scored like
short field goals.  Maybe count them as 19-yard attempts (or however long
they actually are).  But they shouldn't count as much in the index as regular
field goals, since extra points are only worth 1 point, whereas field goals are
worth 3.  That is, extra points are not as important as 19-yard field goals.

This index couldn't be any more complicated than the quarterback ratings.  I'm
surprised that no "Kicker's Index" has been created yet.  At least, I haven't
heard of one.
From: rinehart@aramis.rutgers.edu (Mark J. Rinehart)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: For New York Giants Fans
Date: 22 Dec 92 17:20:34 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <102922@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:

> In article <1992Dec22.002632.25620@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> kevinlu@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Kevin Lu) writes:
> >Ray Handley and Rod Rust **must** GO!!
> >End of Discussion.
> >But who can we get to replace them?
> Tom Coughlin, head coach of the Boston College football team.  He
> was with the GIANTS organization but left to take up head coaching
> job at B.C.  He has done tremendous things with that offense
> especially with Chucky Dukes and their QB (whose name escapes me).
> All right so they got blown out by Notre Dame but Coughlin has made
> the most out of his personnel. 
> GIANTS management has their sights on him.
> Ironically, the name of the B.C. football team is... the Eagles :-)
> satish nair


I read a story in last Thursday's paper (The Courier News) that said
that George Young will probably step down after the season, and
Handley will be gone also. It said that Parcells will be back as GM
and Head Coach. Anybody else hear or read anything about this? 







Mark
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: danp@sabre.bellcore.com (Daniel Pomplun)
Subject: Re: Detailed Playoff Picture [LONG]
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 92 02:35:50 GMT

>a great analysis, except for a couple of minor self-contradictions/glitches:
>
>			   AFC Central
>
>   Pittsburgh (10-5)  Cleveland
>
>	   win & Buff loss & Miami loss			- Div2
>
>this scenario actually is divided in two:
>	if SD win  - Div1
>	if SD loss - Div2

Yep, you found the second mistake so far.  Thanx.


>   Houston (9-6)  Buffalo
>
>	   loss & Denver win					- WC2
>
>this seems incorrect to me.  if denver wins & houston loses, houston loses
>the head-to-head matchup with a loss at mile-high.  this makes denver WC2
>and houston WC3.  the analysis of denver seems to confirm this.
>
>	   loss & KC win					- WC3

(This was the first identified mistake.  Thanx again.)


Daniel Pomplun, Bellcore, danp@sabre.bellcore.com
Phone:  (908) 758-2740  Fax: (908) 758-4268
331 Newman Springs Rd, Red Bank, NJ 07701-7020,  MS: NVC-1E246
From: harrisl@unssun.nevada.edu (Larry Harris)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Montana....Touchdown 49errrrrs!
Date: 29 Dec 92 05:31:53 GMT
Reply-To: harrisl@unssun.nevada.edu (Larry Harris)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Nevada, Reno

>From: 343VTQ2@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (William Grant)
Subject: WHY WON'T YOU DIE JOE???
Date: 28 Aug 92 06:27:06 GMT
  WHY???  Do what's best for the team,  retire!  Steve Young is great at
QB,  better than a quite a few starters in my opinion.  But here comes Joe
back from the Grave....I can do it...Just watch me throw!!!!!  (15 passes??)
Give it up Joe,  wake up and see that you're toast,  and the only people who
want you around is the 49er front office because you'll pack em' in the stands.
Montana is toast,  and Young will need a good backup.  Just give it up Joe.
WHY DELAY THE UNAVOIADABLE????  JUST DIE JOE!!!!!   LAY DOWN AND DIE!!!!

>From: drxmann@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Dustin R. Christmann)
Subject: Re: Joe (Toast?) Montana

Big deal.  I was throwing a football around today, but that doesn't mean I
could lead an NFL team to the Super Bowl, or even keep some hotshot DB from
eating my lunch.

Stick a fork in Joe, he's done.  He should do as Larry Bird did, and just admit
that the body isn't as young as it used to be.  It's not that his career is
very lacking in achievement.  He's won 4 Super Bowls, which only Terry Brad-
shaw has done besides Joe.  He's set records left and right.  He'll go down in
history as the most feared man on the field after the two-minute warning.  He's
a shoo-in for the Hall of Fame in his first year of eligibility.

>From: garyr@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM (Gary Rosen)
Subject: Re: MNF: Joey's Return

Right on, man!  Remember back in '86, when the wimp was out eight whole
weeks for some crummy little back surgery?  What a sissy!

- Gary Rosen

He's BAAAACK!

Hey fella's, how would you like your TOAST, BURNED?

Happy New Year!

Larry
From: frank@wanda.princeton.edu (Frank Bilotti)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: CRUNCH TIME - FISH PULL IF OFF!
Date: 21 Dec 92 21:22:14 GMT
Organization: Geology Dept, Princeton Univ
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A75BA0252D01700D@rambo.princeton.edu>
Originator: news@nimaster
X-Xxdate: Mon, 21 Dec 92 16:24:05 GMT
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12

In article <21DEC199215202931@mcvax4.d48.lilly.com> BENVENGA MARK J,
rx84335@mcvax4.d48.lilly.com writes:
>>	I have to disagree, I was yelling at them not to pass, just get the :25
>>off the clock and give it up.  The reasons the play ended up being so
bad
>>was the 28 or so yard punt and the sieve-like defense of the Jets. 
Think
>>about the situation.  You can leave the 'Fins with 1:15, no time-outs on
>>about their own 40.  The lack of time-outs is the clincher for me.  The
>>problem was the Jets secondary letting the 'Fins receivers run sideline
>>patterns for 15 or 20 yards a pop. Also you have to count on your punter
>>to come up with at least a 40 yarder when you need it, no excuse for
that
>>thing he called a punt
>> 
>>	I've only seen three or four Jets games this year and from what I've
>>seen of Nagle I'd say don't let him touch the ball in this situation. 
>>Now there are plenty of Nagle lovers out there and that's fine, but the
>>fact is, he's had a horrible year, talent or not.
>> 
>>WOW that's alot of analysis for onee play, huh?
>
>I have to agree with John.  The Jets are a 4-10 team, and the
>reason is that they don't try to win the game, they try not to lose.
>In that situation, I think you go and get the first down,
>not give the ball away.

Maybe someday we'll both have the pleasure of coaching a perennially
rebuilding team and we can make a real decision of this sort.(:  I don't
have much of a defense for my opinion on this play since it obviously
didn't work...

FRANK
__________________________________________
Go 'Canes & Cowboys
frank@wanda.princeton.edu
__________________________________________
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: a billboard in houston
Date: 30 Dec 1992 15:13:09 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <C01zqr.CE@hpuerca.atl.hp.com> krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes) writes:
 >Only Houston fans would count injuries 9sad,, very sad)

The "Sign" is on a famous Mexican food eatery Papasito's it reads:

HOUSTON 27
BUFFALO  3
INJURIES 8

I talked with one of the local big-wigs at the Oilers flagship station
last night and I ask him "How do you feel about giving the Bills
something to hang up in their locker room ?" He responded with shock
after I told him about the sign. He went on to say that it was very stupid
of them to out that up and the Oilers had nothing to do with it and he was
going to have Oilers officials contact them this morning. I also told
him it's probably too late because I heard about it from someone in Calif.
The only reason I know about it is because I drive by it in the Mornings,
I was shocked to see it on the net four hours after it went up.

To voice your outrage call:

The Houston Oilers
1-(713)797-9111

Papasitos Cantina
1-(713)668-5756

And people ask me why Im a Dallas fan here in Houston ?
I rest my case......
 Go Cowboys !!!!!!
tim



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jsosa@encore.com (Joe Sosa)
Subject: Re: Miami Dolphins - AFC East Champs!!!!!
Reply-To: jsosa@encore.com (Joe Sosa)
Organization: Encore Computer Corp
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 14:37:45 GMT
News-Software: NN 6.4.16

In <1992Dec28.190748.25991@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
| 
| My predictions -- Chiefs and Oilers to win on the road next week,
| setting up KC at Miami and Houston at Pittsburgh.  Did you know that
| in playoff games, Miami is 2-0 lifetime against KC, and the Steelers
| are 3-0 lifetime against the Oilers?  Won't mean much.  I take
| the sentimental choice -- Warren Moon finally in the Super Bowl.
| 
| 
| --Gidi
| 

Actually if the Chiefs win, then the winner of the Buffalo-Houston game will
come to Miami.  So the setup is as follows:

San Diego beats the Chiefs:
	San Diego at Miami
	Buffalo/Houston winner at Pittsburgh

Kansas City beats the Chargers:
	Kansas City at Pittsburgh
	Buffalo/Houston winner at Miami

Joe

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ----- ----  /--- |  Joe Sosa -- jsosa@encore.com -- Encore Computer Corp.
    /   /---   \    |  Go Dolphins, AFC East, AFC, Super Bowl...the road to #1
----   ----  ---/   |  Go Gators, SEC Repeat!!  Beat them Semi-holes!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ash@sad.hp.com (Jim Holsenback)
Subject: Re: Superbowl
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:02:14 GMT
Organization: HP Sonoma County (SRSD/MWTD/MID)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

	Thought about it .... maybe basenote is trying to get a thread going!

	Being from SF Bay Area naturally I like the 49ers, but the Saints
	scare me a bit. I would have to go along with what most folks con-
	sider common knowledge. The Saints just don't have what it takes,
	offensively, to move on to the next level. 

	As far as the AFC ....

	I kinda' like Pittsburg, if Brister isn't playing.
	
	I think I hear alotta' Bills fans screaming .... Sorry 

	I hear you knocken' but you can't come in ....

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jmartin@ntmtv.UUCP (Jeff Martin)
Subject: Re: rec.sport.football.pro
Originator: jmartin@cleomed
Organization: Northern Telecom Incorporated
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 16:23:36 GMT

From article <1992Dec18.195821.1@wharton.upenn.edu>, by reille85@wharton.upenn.edu:
> Over the years, the Eagles have always seemed to win the big games that you
> thought they were going to lose...on the other hand, they've always lost the
> big games you thought they were going to win...
> From the response on this newsgroup, I'll assume we all think the Eagles are
> going to lose...So guess what 'Skins fans...
> 				Eagles 31
> 				Redskins 16
> 
> E - A - G - L - E - S !!!
> Super Bowl Bound
> 

I guess the only 3 playoff games the Eagles have participated in in
the last decade don't count as "big" games?

Jeff Martin
From: krishna@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Krishna R Akkina)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Bills were LUCKY!!!!!!
Date: 3 Jan 1993 22:34:52 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

I'll give the Bills some credit for pulling the miracle of the century.  
Congrats.  But if you think about it, I don't think it was all the Oilers
fault.  It was the will of the gods to make them lose.  Think about it.  
How is it possible that a team like the Oilers (with one of the best defenses 
in the AFC) screw a game like this.  A 35-3 lead!!!  I still can't believe
how it happened.  It all started with a damn onside kick which I didn't see
because I thought the game was over after the INT return for a TD.  But from 
what I heard of it, I something bad might happen to the Oilers.  Silly me to 
think that the Oilers would give up a 32 point lead in one half.  It must be
Rich Stadium.  Something happened.  Before the game, announcers kept on saying 
that the AFC visiting teams had a 14 game losing streak (recently continued by
a really sad chiefs team).  Then when the announcers saw the game was 35-3, 
they counted the Bills out and said that the Oilers would meet the Steelers in
Pitt.  Did you ever notice when announcers say things like that, it happens  
(like a player who has made 12 consecutive free throws and then the guy misses
it)?  Then the calls.  Beebe and the OT no-call on the pass-interference on 
Givins that led to the INT and the winning goal for Buff. AHHHH!!!  I can't 
believe the officials did not see that.  Talley was just riding piggyback on 
Givins.  I think all this just led to the Bills being LUCKY!!!!  Go ahead and 
respond anyone.  I would like to see how you can deny they weren't lucky.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!


A Disgruntled Oilers fan and an Ecstatic Eagles fan.

(And unfortunately, a Blazer fan who watched the Bulls second team win the 
Championship in Game 6 last year)!!  *sigh*

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rustcat@leland.Stanford.EDU (Vallury Prabhakar)
Subject: Re: Draft Report.
Organization: CDR, Stanford University
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 22:41:13 GMT

In article <14157@pogo.wv.tek.com> tcmaint@pogo.wv.tek.com (TeleCom Maintenance) writes:
>
>   Has anyone on the NET ever heard of a pre/post draft publication called
>   "The Poor Mans guide to the NFL draft"?  I was able to get my hands on 
>   one of these a few years ago and it was very helpful prior to the draft,
>   but I have no idea where it came from.
>    If anyone knows of this pub. please respond, I would like to subscribe 
>    prior to the draft.
>				      Thanks, Gary Seifert
						   ^^^^^^^
Uh oh!  Looks like the 49ers are out hunting again, eh?!  :-} :-}

-- Vallury Prabhakar
-- rustcat@sunrise.stanford.edu
-- [415] 725-0163
 
-- 
Eighty percent of air pollution comes from plants and trees. -- Ronald Reagan, famous movie star
 
== rustcat@sunrise.stanford.edu ==
== Office #:    [415] 725-0163  ==
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes)
Subject: Eagles Report
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 01:23:25 GMT
Keywords: Philadelphia 20, New York Giants 10


The Eagles capped a perfect home season with a 20-10 victory over the
Giants.  Philadelphia is the only team in the NFL to go 8-0 at home this
season.  The last time the Eagles finished the season unbeaten at home
was 1949.  For what it's worth, the Eagles won the NFL championship that
year:-).

Report Card:
============

Quarterback:  B.  Randall was 11-21 for 125-yards including a beautiful
34-yard TD pass to Calvin Williams to open the scoring.  Randall also
ran for 35-yards on four carries including a 20-yarder for the Birds
second TD.  Nothing spectacular numbers-wise, but another solid effort.

Runningbacks:  A.  Herschel Walker went over the century mark for the
fifth time this season with 104-yards on 16-attempts.  Herschel became
only the fourth Eagles player, and the first since 1985, to rush for
over 1000-yards in a season.  In addition, Herschel was responsible for
31-yards receiving.  Heath Sherman added 61-yards on 12-carries.

Receivers:  C.  Aside from Calvin Williams' 34-yard TD reception, the
Eagles receivers were held in check most of the day.  Fred Barnett
blew a sure TD on a busted play that Randall ad-libbed on.

Offensive Line:  A.  Second-stringers Brian Baldinger and Daryle Smith
did fine jobs filling in for the injured Ron Heller and Mike Schad.
They were determined to get Herschel his 1000-yards and that they did.
All totaled, the Eagles grounded out 198-yards on the Giants defense.

Defensive Front:  A.  All the starters on the defensive line recorded
sacks on Jeff Hostettler.  The GANG GREEN dominated the Giants allowing
no first downs in the first half and limiting the Giants to 67-yards
rushing.

Secondary:  B-.  Rich Miano came up with a BIG interception, his first
of the season,  to seal the win.  They smothered the Giants receivers
in the first half, but got a little complacent in the second half as
Hostettler finished with 202-yards via the airways.

Special Teams:  C.  Roger Ruzek had a FG attempt blocked and rookie
Jeff Sydner fumbled a punt return that led to a Giants score.  But
the coverage teams were excellent as punter Jeff Feagles nailed four
punts inside the Giants' 20.  Ruzek recoverd after his first failure,
which didn't seem to be his fault, and nailed two 46-yarders.

So the Eagles finished the regular season the same way they started
it, with four straight victories.  But all that means nothing now as
the real season begins next Sunday at New Orleans.  The Eagles beat
the Saints 15-13 way back in week-1.

And my sincere congratulations to the Dallas Cowboys and their fans
on winning the NFC East and to the Washington Redskins and their
followers on gaining the third and final wildcard spot.


E-A-G-L-E-S

Joe Dakes
AT&T Microelectronics
555 Union Boulevard
Allentown, PA  18103
alux1!jmd
From: cubbie@garnet.berkeley.edu (                               )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Montana's dramatic comeback - not!
Date: 28 Dec 1992 21:49:33 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Dec28.174850.15535@mksol.dseg.ti.com> dansmith@mcopn2.dseg.ti.com writes:
>Hey, is it just me or would anyone else like to see Jerry Ball or
>someone behead Joe Montana on his "dramatic" comeback? I'm sorry,
>but I think my grandmother could throw for 300 yards in the 49er
>system.

Then your grandma is better than half of the QBs in the NFL :)


>
>
>