HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: n9040513@henson.cc.wwu.edu (Andrea Aldridge)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Paramount Press Release - TNG - #238: Ship In A Bottle
Date: 11 Jan 93 18:17:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: henson.1993Jan11.181755.15076
Organization: Western Washington University

In article <1ipsruINNmk7@shelley.u.washington.edu> cummings@stein.u.washington.edu (Michael Cummings) writes:
>In <4735@vidiot.UUCP> brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes:
>
>>	STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION: "Ship in a Bottle" -- A calculating
>>	Sherlock Holmesian character traps Picard and others in a holodeck
>>	simulation.

WONDERFUL!  It's aboout time we got back to Professsor Moriarty...I always felt
there was a lot of unfinished possibility from that episode ("Elementary, Dear
Data").



-- 
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
<>  Andrea Aldridge    IRC:  Folkie   E-Mail:  n9040513@henson.cc.wwu.edu <>
<>  WWU - 452 Edens Hall North/Bellingham, WA 98225  USA   (206) 650-2647 <>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc

Puke, gag, hurl...

Kill me please.

I hope they have a character that mutters 'the pain, the pain'.  It will
describe how the audience feels.

Don Boell
From: 00nderwin@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Info needed on STTNG models
Date: 11 Jan 93 02:16:46 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's

In article <C0G46C.JHK@knot.ccs.queensu.ca>, tarun@psyclops.psyc.queensu.ca (Tarun Kripalani) writes:
> How many different types of ships, stations etc
> are available as models from STTNG? I have only
> encountered the Enterprise 1701-D and the 
> Klingon Battle Cruiser.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Tarun Kripalani 
> e-mail:   tarun@psyclops.psyc.queensu.ca
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________

There was also an adversary set that had the Ferengi Maurader (sp?), the
Romulan Bird of Prey, and another ship I think, but I can't remember what it
was.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: meb@sally.acns.nwu.edu (Mark Brodsky)
Subject: Re: Worf in ST6?
Reply-To: mark-brodsky@nwu.edu
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 18:38:33 GMT

In article <93003.131554IO91748@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> IO91748@MAINE.MAINE.EDU  
(Jon Carr) writes:
> Michael Dorn's character in ST6:TUC was indeed Lt. Worf's grandfather
> (the father of Mog (Moog?), Worf's father who was blaimed for the
> Kittimer massacre)  His name was also Worf (Colonel Worf).  I assume
> Worf is their family name and Mog (Moog?) was Worf's father's fist name?
> 

Kilingons have only one name. Worf is "Worf, son of Mog" and his father was  
"Mog, son of Worf" Mog just named Worf after his father.
--
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not  
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
-Richard Nixon 
Mark E. Brodsky				E-mail: mark-brodsky@nwu.edu
Northwestern University                 or  markb@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
Evanston, Il.
Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.misc:13467 rec.arts.startrek.current:22969
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Paramount Schedule - TNG - As of 1/5/93
Date: 9 Jan 93 06:19:05 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout


127   9/19/92  227  46001.3	Time's Arrow Part II
128   9/26/92  228  46041.1	Realm of Fear
129  10/03/92  229  46071.6	Man of the People
130  10/10/92  230  46125.3	Relics
131  10/17/92  231  46154.2	Schisms
132  10/24/92  232  46192.3	True Q
133  10/31/92  233  46235.7	Rascals
134  11/07/92  234  46271.5	A Fistful of Datas
135  11/14/92  235  46307.2	The Quality of Life
     11/21/92  227R 46001.3	Time's Arrow Part II
     11/28/92  228R 46041.1	Realm of Fear
     12/05/92  229R 46071.6	Man of the People
136  12/12/92  236  46357.4	Chain of Command, Part I
137  12/19/92  237  46360.8	Chain of Command, Part II
     12/26/92  230R 46125.3	Relics
      1/02/93  231R 46154.2	Schisms
      1/09/93  232R 46192.3	True Q
      1/16/93  233R 46235.7	Rascals
138   1/23/93  238		Ship In A Bottle
139   1/30/93  239		Aquiel
140   2/06/93  240		Face Of The Enemy
141   2/13/93  241		Tapestry

The date is the first date of satellite uplink.  Paramount's official
'week of' is two days later.  Stardates will be added when known.
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
From: mkelly@happy.helios.nd.edu (michael kelly)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Cardassia = Iraq
Date: 11 Jan 93 18:30:00 GMT
Reply-To: mkelly@happy.helios.nd.edu (michael kelly)
Organization: University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame


 CXMP000 <CXMP@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA> writes:

|>  pmichals@teal.csn.org (Paul Michals) writes:
|> >
|> > the pararells to Iraq are so pointed as to                             be
|> >(almost) irrefutable: Here we have an aggressive military dictatorship who
|> >resenting the West is poised to forceably take a strategic piece of land
|> >(Kuwait) claiming it is their rightful (Babylonian) heritage.
|> 
|> >                           IN SUMMARY:
|> >
|> >        Cardassia                               Iraq
|> >        ---------                               -----
|> >
|> >Claims nearby Minos Korva                Claims nearby Kuwait
|> >Huge aggressive military                 Huge aggressive military
|> >Slightly behind the Fed. in Tech.        Slightly behind the West in Tech.
|> >Wants doomsday Metagenic weapon          Wants doomsday A-bomb weapon
|> >Uses torture as matter of course         Uses torture as matter of course
|> >Lays claim to ancient greatness          Lays claim to ancient greatness
|> Persecutes Bajorans                       Persecutes Kurds
|> Resents presence of Fed.                  Resents presence of UN

Loots DS9 prior to leaving		     Loots Kuwait prior to leaving

-- 
+               Mike Kelly, Notre Dame Department of Physics                +
+                                                                           +
+ mkelly@doc.helios.nd.edu          "The more you drive,                    + 
+ mkelly@undhe5.hep.nd.edu                 the less intelligent you are."   +
From: A.M.T.Bell@daresbury.ac.uk (A.M.T. Bell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: TNG on Sky One
Date: 4 Jan 93 16:14:28 GMT
Reply-To: atb@gserv1.dl.ac.uk
Organization: Daresbury Laboratory, UK

Hello

The Sky One satellite tv station has been showing TNG 5 days a week for the last
few months, my understanding is that they are showing all the episodes shown by
BBC2 ie everything up to BOBWII. They are showing season 3 episodes at the moment
but at 5 shows per week it can't be more than a couple of weeks until they get to
BOBWII. Any ideas what they are going to do next, is there any chance that they
will go on to show seasons 4+?

tony bell                 ! keep on running   live long and prosper
serc daresbury laboratory ! "back off man, i'm a scientist"
atb@uk.ac.dl.gserv1       ! bill murray - ghostbusters
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: dlileiki@AFIT.AF.MIL
Subject: Re: ST:TNG - Plot flaw or am I missing something?
Organization: Air Force Institue of Technology, WPAFB OH
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 16:57:19 GMT

In article <8yk0wB3w165w@berry.Cary.NC.US> pat@berry.Cary.NC.US (Pat Berry) writes:
>From: pat@berry.Cary.NC.US (Pat Berry)
>Subject: Re: ST:TNG - Plot flaw or am I missing something?
>Date: Tue, 12 Jan 93 07:38:42 EST
>dlileiki@AFIT.AF.MIL writes:
>
>> I just saw the ST:TNG episode where subspace creatures kidnap members of the 
>> Enterprise crew, do experiments on them, and send them back.  The storyline 
>> implies that these creatures found the Enterprise because of Jordie's sensor 
>
>It's been six years.  Isn't it about time to learn how to spell the
>characters' names?  GEORDI.
>
>> adjustments.  However, the show opens with Ricker having trouble sleeping
>
>RIKER.

Hey Pat, I apologized for the spelling errors, or didn't you read that far? 
Since I'm not a 'trekkie' or 'trekker' or any other type of ST zealot (just 
a fan), I have better things to do than memorize things like the spelling of
characters' names, episode titles, and the like. So flame off!
 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: jeq@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist)
Subject: Re: ST:DS9 music
Organization: Lachman Technology, Incorporated, Naperville, IL
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 20:33:07 GMT

In article <C0F4Fw.6MC@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> cebarton@napier.uwaterloo.ca (Casey Barton) writes:
>    I was completely nonplussed by the music in the show so far. The intro
>was extremely disappointing. The first notes, the straining violins, kept the
>same feel as that of both TNG and TOS. What I was expecting, I guess, was for
>the music to drop down after a little bit into some rackish electric guitar
>and heavy percussion, in line with the "crueler, gritter Trek" idea. At the
>least, to move into a powerful orchestrated score, as TNG does. 

No, I'd expect it to be nothing like the TNG score, as it shouldn't be.

>    But *nothing* happened. The violins and trumpets kept right on straining,

You have a peculiar conception of "straining", IMHO.

>until fade-to-black. This does little to reinforce the "rough-edged" station
>theme that has been built up. They might have been doing camera fly-by's of
>the Cistine Chapel. 

I had to pick spelling nits, but you misspelled "Christine".

>    ...still eagerly awaiting the "Dax in the transporter" YATI.

Hmmmm, that _would_ confuse the biofilters, wouldn't it?


Anybody else bothered by the fact that, when O'Brian paid his last respects
to the bridge on the Enterprise (where he never appeared in TNG), the
bridge was devoid of all officers, and was manned entirely by extras?

(Or maybe that was just the night watch...)
-- 
Jonathan E. Quist                              Lachman Technology, Incorporated
jeq@i88.isc.com  '71 CL450-K4 "Gleep", DoD #094        Naperville, IL
 __       There's nothing quite like the pitter-patter of little feet,
 \/                   followed by the words "Daddy!  Yay!"
From: asmith@acorn.co.uk (Andy Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Wanted: Help with TNG tapes!
Date: 8 Jan 93 08:51:16 GMT
Organization: Acorn Computers Limited, Cambridge, UK

Jos.Courbois@p113.f1.n100.z60.wlink.nl (Jos Courbois) writes:

>All tapes costs 10.99 or 11.99 UK Pounds in the shops in England.
>I let them mail to me by a friend who lives overthere. Each month
>there is 1 10.99 and 1 11.99 tape. They have now 58 tapes of ST:TNG.
>All the TOS-tapes are out now.
>Deep Space Nine will arrive from june.

Right lets straighten things out. There are currently 56 TNG tapes available
in the UK, and they are all the same price, though this varies depending on
where you buy them. At HMV there 11.99, at forbidden planet (who do mail    
order) they are 10.99.

57 and 58 are due out on Monday, there were no tapes released in December.
DSN will be released the month after they release Chain of command, so I would
not expect to see it until September time, unless they step up the release
of TNG tapes. Also TUC will be released on sell through on February 26th.

Andy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: gt7529d@prism.gatech.EDU (Belgarion of Riva, Overlord of the West)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: "Redemption II" ships
Date: 10 Jan 93 22:50:01 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


	OK, here's a toughy: remember when the tachyon net graphics were
shown in "Redemption II" - when the net was first set up and when the Romulans
first disrupted it? They showed the individual ships participating in
the net as well as their registry numbers. Unfortunately, my tape isn't sharp
enough resolution-wise to read them. If someone out there knows what the 
ships and numbers were, PLEASE e-mail me. Thanks!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"All I ask is a tall ship, and a star to steer her by" -Masefield, "Sea Fever"
"I don't believe in the no-win scenario...I don't like to lose" -JTK, ST II
"If worse comes to worst, I still know how to run" -Silk, _Enchanter's End Game
"...And with strange aeons, even death may die" -Abdul Alhazred, _Necronomicon_

Cluttered Mind (lover of Trek, Eddings, Lovecraft, and other funky stuff)
gt7529d@prism.gatech.edu
From: pat@berry.Cary.NC.US (Pat Berry)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Help
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 10:15:42 EST
Organization: Berry Communications

jclark@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (J. Michael Clark) writes:

> Nothing has been said about the Enterprise B....

Not true.  The ST:TNG Technical Manual has this to say about it:

  The third Enterprise, NCC-1701-B, was an Excelsior class ship built at
  Starfleet's Antares Ship Yards.  Although the decision to model this
  ship on the failed original experimental Excelsior was at the time
  controversial, the economics of using the existing (and otherwise
  successful) engineering of the basic spaceframe were compelling.  The
  wisdom of this decision has been borne out by the large number of
  Excelsior class starships that still serve Starfleet in a variety of
  capacities.  (Indeed, the Excelsior herself ultimately proved to be a
  distinguished part of the Starfleet.)  The third Enterprise was a key
  figure in the exploration of space beyond the Gourami Sector.  This ship
  and her crew were responsible for mapping over 142 star systems,
  including first contact with seventeen civilizations.

-- 
Pat Berry - Cary, North Carolina, USA   |  "This nation was built on the
pat@berry.Cary.NC.US                    |  sweat and drool of dogs."
**** Happy user of OS/2 2.0 ****        |  -- Dave Barry
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: atekant@wimsey.bc.ca (Argun Tekant)
Subject: Live - long - and - prosper (?)
Organization: Wimsey Information Services
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 23:21:21 GMT

I've been having doubts on how this phrase should be interpreted.

Is it:
	(LIVE LONG) and (PROSPER)
or 
	Live (LONG and PROSPER)

What do you people thinks?

Argun.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: acp52294@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Kargis the Strong)
Subject: Re: Lwaxana - Who plays her?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 20:33:09 GMT

WEZAMG@DEVAX1 (George ZAMROZ) writes:


>In <9212211822.AA24704@enet-gw.pa.dec.com> d_ellis@ricks.enet.dec.com writes:

>> rkh@ucs.att.com (Bob Halloran) writes:
>> 
>> > It is a well-known piece of Trek trivia that Majel Barrett Roddenbury
>> > is the one performer who has appeared in ALL of the Trek venues
>> 
>> What about Mark Lenard, whose role as Sarek spans TOS, TAS (voice in
>> "Yesteryear"), the films and TNG?
>> 
>> P.S.  When Majel plays in DS9, this posting will be obsoleted.
>>

Not only has she been in all of the actual series, and omnipresent as the voice
of the computer, but she was also in the original Pilot for star trek, giving
her and Leonard Nimoy, whose also been in all series in question, the greatest
duration in terms of our earth years on star trek.

AC

-- 
Anand C. Patel    |"We separate past and future and find that time is an amalgam
SigVR Chairman    | of both. We separate good and evil and find that mind is an
patel@cs.uiuc.edu | amalgam of both. To understand, we must grasp the whole."
(217) 352-0284    | 				 -- Isaac Asimov
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: stailey@bugs.comm.mot.com (Mike Stailey)
Subject: Re: Live - long - and - prosper (?)
Reply-To: stailey@comm.mot.com
Organization: Motorola LMPS Research, Schaumburg, IL
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 08:47:23 GMT

(Argun Tekant) writes:

*I've been having doubts on how this phrase should be interpreted.

*Is it:
*	(LIVE LONG) and (PROSPER)
*or 
*	Live (LONG and PROSPER)
*
*What do you people thinks?

 Methinks someone has way too much time on their hands.

 --
 Michael
From: chew@accel.aa.washington.edu (Gilbert Chew)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Gold Plaque
Date: 6 Jan 1993 03:01:02 GMT
Organization: U of Wash Dept of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Distribution: world
Reply-To: chew@accel.aa.washington.edu (Gilbert Chew)
NNTP-Posting-Host: accel.aa.washington.edu

In article <1ida7sINN7v0@shelley.u.washington.edu>, medic@hardy.u.washington.edu (Travis Lauricella) writes:
|> 
|> kupo@cs.concordia.ca (KUPO francois) writes:
|> 
|> 
|> >Does anyone know what is written on the gold plaque on the bridge of the
|> >Enterprise from TOS?  You know, the one just under the Red Alert beacon?
|> >Two guesses:  a commissioning plaque (ie, something like "USS Enterprise
|> >NCC-1701 commissioned on stardate blah-blah...") or the "To boldly go..."
|> >speech.  Anyone know for sure?
|> 
|> Right on both counts.  I don't have my tech manual with me, but if my
|> memory serves me right it says something like "USS Enterprise, built at the
|> (someplace) fields, inaugural flight on stardate 410??.?" followed by a
|> listing of the starfleet officers who had a hand in building it (such as
|> Adm. Roddenberry, Berman, et al.).  At the bottom, it has the "To boldly
|> go" quote.
|> -- 
|> J. Travis Lauricella     | In the 1500's, we called it witchcraft.
|> <medic@u.washington.edu> | In the 1900's, we called it Murphy's Law.
|>                          | In the 2300's, we call them chronotron fields.
|> "Be good, and you will be lonesome." -- Mark Twain
|> 

Hmm, I could be wrong, but I think the original poster was referring
to the original Enterprise, NCC-1701 (no bloody A, B, C, or D).  Note
use of the letters "TOS."

So far, I've only seen answers that refer to the TNG (redundant T?)
Enterprise.  Which don't answer the original question.

IMHO.  Whatever.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: mtaffe@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Michael Taffe)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Picard's Replacement
Keywords: Branagh
Date: 8 Jan 93 22:56:18 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <29227@optima.cs.arizona.edu> margaret@cs.arizona.edu (Margaret Newman) writes:
>
>I vote with the person who nominated Kenneth Branagh as Picard's
>replacement.  I think he'd be great.  Sense of humor, hair, good sparkle
>in the eye, commanding presence, hair, British accent, Shakespearen
>background, hair.
>
>-margaret

Yeah, it really is too bad that they didn't get yet another white-anglo-
male lead for DSN!

-taffe
From: wesc@cs.ucsb.edu ((Wesley J. Chun))
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: TOP 10 DS9 TITLES
Keywords: titles, humor
Date: 12 Jan 93 19:46:06 GMT
Organization: University of California, Santa Barbara

Okay, okay.  There's been a lot of sabotage to the new
show title recently, here is a:

TOP 10 LIST of SHOW TITLES
==========================

Deep Space Nine		-- the name as it is now

Deep Space Five		-- merges with Babylon 5

Deep Space 1999		-- merges with Space 1999

Deep Throat Nine	-- sci-fi version of the classic

Deep Six Nine		-- sequel to the above with new "twist"

Deep K9			-- a space station built for dogs, *or*
			   a dog of a space station

Deep Sh-t Nine		-- a worse rathole than it already is; *or*
			   what happens to the station if the Ferengi
			   and the Space Rangers take over

Deep Goal Line		-- instead of a Promenade, the station
			   comes with a holographic football field

Deep Space 1984		-- C in C is Big Brother; Cardassians torture
			   Picard/Winston and Vash/Julia, and others

Deep Space 90120	-- space station overrun by financially
			   independent teenagers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Lookit all this traffic!  I feel like FROGGER!" - pedestrian trying to cross
						    at a UCSB bikeway during
						    the height of rush hour

**** Wesley J. Chun ****		Department of Computer Science
*** wesc@cs.ucsb.edu ***		2106 Engineering I, Box 46
**** (805) 968-8723 ****		University of California
**** (805) 893-8553 **** [fax]		Santa Barbara, CA  93106-5110
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: 3386838@ipc16.queensu.ca (student 3386838)
Subject: Re: Transporter question..
Reply-To: 3386838@ipc16.queensu.ca
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:50:12 GMT

In article L697187@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM, L697187@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM () writes:
>Forgive me if I cannot cite specific examples but on several shows
>I have seen them beam to another transporter room.  Either on a planet
>or on another ship.  However, I have seen them beam to other ships
>and not use the other ship's transporter room.  One of TNG's
>inconsistancies.

Perhaps the beaming to another transporter pad significantly reduces the
amount of energy required?  I know they did this in ST:TOS, so it may
be that they are trying to be consistant with the old show..

>Regarding beaming around the ship rather than use the transporter:  I
>saw this discussed in a different newsgroup.  I believe it had something
>to do with power requirements.  The Enterprise does not have limitless
>power sources.  The turbolifts use considerably less engery and thus
>are preferred for in-ship transport.  This is why starships still have
>escape pods (beginning of DS9).  The amount of enegery needed to beam
>all hands and dependants to a nearby planet simultaneously would be
>staggering.

Agreed. Also, in the ST:TOS show where an "Energy-Alien" provokes a
confrontation between the Federation and Klingons, they make the point
that intra-ship beaming is also quite dangerous... "Ya wouldna want'a wind
up inside a bulkhead"...  Apparently, the finesse required for totally
accurate transporter calculations was available to Montgomery. 

---
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
|  Wes Garland                 | The Admiral                                 | 
|  Queen's University          | Terminal Velocity Kingston                  |
|  Kingston, Ontario, CANADA   | Fidonet 1:249/128                           |
|______________________________|_____________________________________________|
|  3386838@jeff-lab.queensu.ca | Pump up with Jim Kirk at the He's Dead Gym! |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: mlbm@lanl.gov (Mark Martinez)
Subject: Re: THINGS...
Reply-To: mlbm@lanl.gov
Organization: Los Alamos National Lab
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 14:35:54 GMT

In article <6368.36.uupcb@uttsbbs.uucp> paul.parkhurst@uttsbbs.uucp (Paul  
Parkhurst)  writes:
>    Out of curiosity....
> 
>    Does anyone know if the Hallmark "Galilleo 7" Christmas ornaments
> (you know, the one with Spock saying "Happy Holidays") has gone up in
> value yet?  I know the February after the Enterprise ornament came out,
> it was already up to $65... last con I went so, I saw them going for
> $150 (no way I'd sell the one I have, though).
>
                   
One of the local Hallmark stores had a half-price sale on Christmas  
merchandise, including the Galileo ornaments ($12). I have seen them on sale at  
Mervyns also. I think Hallmark made quite a few of these ornaments.

mark martinez
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc