HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Re: Why Can't Republicans or Programmers Spell?
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 92 03:32:40 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <cortez.716607472@milton> cortez@milton.u.washington.edu (Tom Warner) writes:
>jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>
>>John Switzer               | 50 years from now, nobody will
>>                           | remember Candice Bergen or Murphy
>>74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | Brown, but every school kid will
>>jrs@netcom.com             | be taught about President Quayle.
>
>I found one! I found one! A genuine stupid-enough-to-think-Quayle-could-even-
>get-the-'96-nomination-under-favorable-circumstances Republican!!!!
>
>Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

Laugh while you can, monkey boy! It'll make victory in 1996, 2000, AND 2004
all the sweeter!
-- 
John Switzer               | 50 years from now, nobody will
                           | remember Candice Bergen or Murphy
74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | Brown, but every school kid will
jrs@netcom.com             | be taught about President Quayle.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: titmas@chdasic.sps.mot.com (Eric Titmas)
Subject: Phx TV
Organization: SPS
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:40:48 GMT

Phx. Az. Rush schedule is M-F 11:35p.m.-12:05a.m.
-- 
Eric Titmas      Motorola ASIC       titmas@chdasic.sps.mot.com               

It is impossible to take in more money than Congress can spend.  - Thomas Sowell
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:4405 alt.politics.clinton:4514 alt.fan.dan-quayle:3463 alt.politics.bush:4456
From: eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Knee-jerk reaction Re: Clinton Screws Up!  Press Reports It!
Summary: Au contraire mon ami!
Keywords: missiles, Bill Clinton, CNN, Dan Quayle, mistake
Date: 9 Sep 92 14:56:50 GMT
Followup-To: alt.rush-limbaugh
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

Au contraire mon ami!

jswitzer@afit.af.mil (Chip Switzer) writes:
@In a startling change of events this morning, my newspaper actually
@had a (short) paragraph on a recent Clinton faux pas.  
@
@Seems at a campaign stop he railed on the big spending we were doing
@on military weapons systems and brought up the Patriot which "can fly
@through doors and down chimineys."  Hmmmm.  Probably just an honest
@mistake from somebody who doesn't know a good offense from a bad
@defense...

Well, CNN today (9-10AM 9/9/92) reported that DAN QUAYLE had made the
gaffe! Later in the program the anchors apologized for the error and
said that it was in fact Bill Clinton who screwed up.

Boy, it's hard to break four years of habit! :-)

-- 
Emil Thomas Chuck (Duke BME '93)		eyc@acpub.duke.edu
I'm too busy for my class, too busy for my clubs, too busy for my work.
I'm too busy for my mail, too busy for my news, too busy for my calls.
I'm too busy for this .sig.
From: steve@celia.UUCP (Steve Tyree)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Clinton campaigns in Republican territory
Date: 9 Sep 92 23:35:39 GMT
Reply-To: celia!steve@usc.edu (Steve Tyree)
Organization: Rhythm & Hues, Inc., Hollywood

In article <1992Sep9.205623.2473@ils.nwu.edu> hooker@aristotle.ils.mwu.edu ( BOB HOOKER) writes:
->I did not watch this story on TV,  but I did read it in the paper and on
->the net.  If you bother to read the article closely rather then just
->positing liberal bias to it you will notice that comments from the audiance
->are reported in great detail; 	

 I was talking about TV coverage of the event. Not the article. Why should I
waste bandwidth pointing out the obvious. The ARTICLE was a good one. The TV
coverage of the event is what I was trying to address.

->I also remeber the Clinton blew his top friday at reporters who were
->questioning him about his record on the draft.  He accused them of grilling
->him on this issue while they ignored new charges against Bush on
->Iran-Contra.  Seems kind of strange that co-conspiritors would act in this
->way?

 "I have said all that Im going to say about this." Clintons typical response
will not work forever. Bush addressed his "No new taxes" mistake. When will
Clinton start addressing his ? I always thought the press made a mistake in
the last election by attacking Quayle and ignoring Iran-Contra.
 With todays current anti-congress sentiment, trying to attack bush for break-
ing a Congressional Law intended to tie Presidential hands will not get them
anywhere.

 Steve Tyree - These opinions are mine and mine alone.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: alex@engr3.umbc.edu (alex)
Subject: Re: Right-wingers attack immigrant backers
Organization: University of Maryland, Baltimore County Campus
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 01:30:49 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.201552.12287@afit.af.mil> jswitzer@afit.af.mil (Chip Switzer) writes:

>>	Well, in spite of the socialist roots of Nazism, the American Nazi
>>Party and the KKK are much closer to the GOP then the Democratic party.
>>I would expect that the average modern Nazi would consider the Dems to
>>be the epitomy of ZOG. (I notice that David Duke wasn't a democrat).
>
>David Duke ran as a Republican.  David Duke is (probably?) racist.  I
>haven't heard him say he's a Nazi.  You are making the same connection
>that began this.  Racism != Conservatism.  It has no place in the
>conservative dogma.  As you pointed out, Nazism had it's roots in
>Socialism--about as far from Conservatism as you can get.  

	If you haven't heard David Duke say he's a Nazi, you haven't listened.
I have a photo of Duke in a Nazi uniform (courtisy of Spy), he's been 
distributing Mein Kamph and other Nazi propoganda for years, he's called
Hitler a hero in public, he celebrates hitlers birthday and he's been a
member of the American Nazi Party. What more do you want.

	He's probably a racist, too, listening to him talk about sending
the negros back to africa and the Jewish conspiricy. I've also come to
understand that the KKK is a racist organization (He was the Imperial Wizard).

	Trust me Chip, you don't want to touch this one. Honest.

	In any case, I didn't claim that racist (or Nazi) suggested 
conservative, only that modern day American Nazis are more likely to vote
republican and identify with the GOP. If nothing else, the Jews always
vote Democrat, and thats enough (Zionist Occupied Government, et al).
Modern Nazis hate communism, because in the US, it means that they would
have to associate with black people and foriegners. 




-- 
                               Alex Crain::UMBC Academic Computing Services
"I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens,
 nor should they be considered patriots.  This is one nation under God"
                                     - George Herbert Walker Bush, Feb 1989 
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: chrisda@atlantis.CS.ORST.EDU (David Christensen)
Subject: Re: Far Right's New "Bill of Rights"
Organization: Computer Science Outreach Services - Oregon State University
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 07:59:32 GMT

In article <20312@plains.NoDak.edu> green@plains.NoDak.edu (Brad Green) writes:
>In article <1992Sep8.154118.777@umbc3.umbc.edu> alex@engr3.umbc.edu (alex) writes:
>>	Hmm. can we get GHWB to take some responsibilty for the worst
>>economic environment since the depression? Last I heard, it was still the
>>fault of the "deadlock congress". Last I heard, George wasn't responsible
>>for the bills the he signed, let alone the stuff that he never heard of
>>(like Iran Contra).
>
>Hmm, can we also blame the rest of the world's poor economic conditions on
>Bush?  In Canada, unemployment is 11%.  Japanese companies are reporting
>losses for the first time in their history.  French farmers are demonstrating
>in the streets.  The press seems to ignore putting the whole story out in
>one piece, and when it's split up, it doesn't have the effect of showing
>this slowdown in global terms.  And in case you haven't heard, there have
>been far worse conditions since the depression, how about '76 for instance?
>And I remember very well the conditions in '79 - that's why Reagan got in
>in the first place.  The only chance the Democrats have is convincing you
>that this is the worst it's been since the depression, and it seems you
>bought that argument.

Well, which is it?  Did Jimmy Carter cause the oil embargo and worldwide
energy crunches of the 70's?  But the recessions of the 80's and 90's were
simply a global/cyclical thing that our Presidents weren't responsible for?

Oh, wait... I forgot.  Jimmy Carter caused those recessions, too   :)

Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: best@anasazi.com (Mike Best)
Subject: Re: Clinton Screws Up! Press Reports It!
Organization: Anasazi Inc, Phoenix AZ USA
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 17:00:12 GMT

In article <nate.564@psygate.psych.indiana.edu> nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle) writes:
>best@anasazi.com (Mike Best) writes:
>>jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. Schechner) writes:
>>>      Please excuse the cynicism, but how else do you expect a politician
>>>to get elected nowadays?  I was heavily involved in a city council ...
>
>    Hey, the Founders are still around, but their biggest problem is 
>*not* getting elected. They need to work on getting exhumed and resurrected 
>first. (Since this is the Rush Limbaugh group I feel compelled to note  
>that there seems to be a statistical link between being a founding father 
>and being dead; sounds like a conspiracy to me... at the very least it's a 
>powerful argument against founding anything...)

That's funny!

>    Seriously, Mike, I'm surprised at the glum, cynical tone of your 
>comment. As far as statemen go I'd say that the Republicans have more 
>than their share. I have a lot of respect for Jack Kemp and Bill Bennett 
>although I tend to disagree with them on most things. I'm sure that a lot 
>of people will be outraged at this, but I *do not* think that Dan Quayle 
>is a great statesman, and it boggles my mind that some people can seriously 
>contemplate Quayle at the head of the Republican ticket in '96 while hot 
>prospects like Kemp and Bennett wait in the wings.

Perhaps I should put it this way, in the Congress there is a minority of
statesmen.  I am saddened by the continuous usurpation of Executive
power by the Congress and their inability to recognize the wisdom of
the Founders.  A case in point is the resistance to the line item veto
which would likely fix a disfunctional legislative process.  Regardless
of the party in control of the Executive branch, a line item veto would
require the Congress to vote on individual items thus making the issue
stand or fall on it's own merrits.  This is in contrast to today where
items are "riders" on bills and thus resemble parasites to me.

(Madison feared that the legislature would try to get around the veto).

Quayle has got a bad rap and a bad rep which are both undeserved except
for the fact that he is not a great orator.  Bob Woodward stated on
this past weeks Brinkley show that Quayle has received a bad rap and
that, should something happen to Bush, he would indeed be an effective
President.  Others, who are not Comedians or TV personalities but are
respected experts, have commented much to the same.  


Mike Best
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: alex@engr3.umbc.edu (alex)
Subject: Re: Carter bad, Bush good?
Organization: University of Maryland, Baltimore County Campus
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 16:35:46 GMT

In article <6177@taurus.cs.nps.navy.mil> rovero@oc.nps.navy.mil (Josh Rovero) writes:
>Yes, how "poor" is someone who OWNS their own home (as 40% of those
>in the latest group of poverty stricken people do), have air
>conditioning, color TV, own automobiles, etc.

	Gee, Josh, you make it sound so nice. Have you ever seen a poor person?


-- 
                               Alex Crain::UMBC Academic Computing Services
The feminist agenda is a socialist, anti-family political movement that 
encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice 
witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. - Pat Robertson 1992
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: titmas@chdasic.sps.mot.com (Eric Titmas)
Subject: Re: Clinton Screws Up! Press Reports It!
Organization: SPS
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 18:00:13 GMT

In article <1992Sep13.000325.3310@anasazi.com>, john@anasazi.com (John R. Moore) writes:
|> Keywords: 
|> 
|> In article <1992Sep12.184941.349@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. Schechner) writes:
|> ]>Of course, anyone with half a brain knows that Limbaugh is kidding
|> ]>when he says that. Listen to him for a bit and you'll realize that he
|> ]>is very much an entertainer. By the way, I was also listening to that
|> ]>show, and I heard it too, but I recognize humour.
|> ]
|> ]
|> ]	Yeah, but the fact of the matter is that the bulk of his
|> ]listeners DON'T have that half a brain.  Almost all (of not all) of
|> ]the people who have access to this network are at least reasonably
|> ]well educated and can see the obvious sarcasm in Rush's statement.
|> ]HOWEVER, the majority of the American people aren't quite that lucky.
|> ](and by lucky I mean a)lucky enough to be intelligent and b)lucky
|> ]enough to have gone to college).  
|> 
|> Hmmm... is this incredibly arrogant, or what?
|> 
Yes,  incredibly arrogant.  But he forgot to sign off as Dr.
-- 
Eric Titmas      Motorola ASIC       titmas@chdasic.sps.mot.com               

It is impossible to take in more money than Congress can spend.  - Thomas Sowell
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:4572 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:5266
From: eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: TV station list so far
Date: 11 Sep 92 15:08:04 GMT
Followup-To: alt.rush-limbaugh
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

attebery@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
+Here's the TV station list so far:
+
+Television Station List:
+
+(Note: The time listed is the starting time. The show runs 1 hour.)
+
+ST  MARKET		CALL	TV/CABLE   AFF	 DAY	TIME
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+CA  Los Angeles	KCOP    13               M-F    1:00a
+CA  Santa Maria	KCOY    12               M-F    12:30a
+CA  San Francisco      KPIX    5          CBS   M-F    2:00a
+CA  Visalia            KMPH    29               M-F    12:00m
+CO  Denver		KMGH    7                M-F    11:35p
+IA  Cedar Rapids	KCRG    9                M-F    12:05a
+KS  Kansas City	KMBC    9          ABC   M-F    12:30a
+NC  Durham		WRDC    28/12      NBC   M-F    12n
+NE  Omaha		KETV    7          ABC   M-F    12m
+NJ  New Brunswick      WWOR    9          FOX   M-F    12:30a
+NM  Albuquerque	KOAT    7          ABC   M-F    12:00m
+OH  Cincinnati		WLWT    5          NBC   M-F    12:30
+OR  Portland		KOIN	6          CBS   M-F
+TX  Austin		KBVO	42/5	   FOX	 M-F	12n-1p
+
+Please send any updates, changes, etc. to
+
+			attebery@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
+
+Thanks!

Note the times: 10/14 of the times will be late at night.
1) Can Rush compete with Arsenio, Leno, and Dave?
2) What will I do when Rush is on TV and the radio (I'm in Durham NC)?
3) Can you say television equivalent of shelving (refering to San Fran's
   time for RL)?
4) Can I get my VCR to stop blinking 12:00m, or will it matter?

-- 
Emil Thomas Chuck (Duke BME '93)		eyc@acpub.duke.edu
I'm too busy for my class, too busy for my clubs, too busy for my work.
I'm too busy for my mail, too busy for my news, too busy for my calls.
I'm too busy for this .sig. 
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:4874 alt.fan.dan-quayle:3766
From: jxxl@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Clinton Screws Up! Press Reports It!
Date: 15 Sep 92 15:42:01 GMT
Reply-To: jxxl@cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke)
Organization: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA

celia!steve@usc.edu (Steve Tyree) writes:

>  Join the Rush Limbaugh crowd. Were laughing at the people laughing at
> Quayle.

Why'd you stop? D'joo come down with The Joker cheek-lock syndrome?

John
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: eck@panix.com (Mark Eckenwiler)
Subject: Re: Clinton Screws Up! Press Reports It!
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 04:58:51 GMT
Organization: Superseding Information, Inc.

In <1937@celia.UUCP>, celia!steve@usc.edu sez:
> By the way, do you "elightened" quayle bashers realiase that Dan usually
>reads from a speech. Is it not possible that he said it the way the speech
>writers intended him to say it. Why on earth would they ever do that ?
> "Born Free as Free as the Grass Grows....."
> Do I need to spell this one out or have you got it yet ?

It's obvious.  You think that Marilyn Fitzwater-Quayle is in fact Elsa
the lion cub, with Dan playing the role of Patti Patti the rock hyrax.

What *I* want to know is which member of the Second Family gets to be
portrayed by Kam Fong.


-- 
	     Every time you think, you weaken the nation.
				- attributed to Moe Howard

	Mark Eckenwiler    eck@panix.com    ...!cmcl2!panix!eck
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:4693 alt.news-media:1281 alt.fan.dan-quayle:3651
From: foy@aero.org (Richard Foy)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.news-media,alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Replying to New Zealand  was Re: Clinton Screws Up! Press Reports It!
Date: 13 Sep 92 14:25:22 GMT
Organization: The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: aerospace.aero.org

In article <1992Sep14.121218.19645@anomaly.sbs.risc.net> kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan) writes:

>
>
>I don't actually know why I'm responding to a posting from New Zealand...
>As if people there actually KNOW anything about American politics, or,
>for that matter, should be sticking their noses into our countries
>political scene...
>
...
>-- 
>--  Michael P. Deignan                      / Sex is hereditary. If your 


I pay attention to posts from people in New Zealand and other non US
countries because:

1) They tend to be highly knowledgeable about the US poltical system etc
2) I have observed this both by reading the net, and by meeting them in
their own country.
3) They are not indoctrinated with the progaganda in the US.

They should be entitled to stick their noses into our business because or
ur government sticks our nose into their business in a big way. For
example:

1) Look at the history of nculear ships and New Zealand ports.
2) Look at the history of self government of Palua.
3) Look at the history of our relationship to almost any country in the
world.

Richard Foy
Redondo Beach CA       Standard Disclaimer
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.activism.d,alt.politics.clinton
From: andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman)
Subject: Transportation
Organization: Computer Science Department,  Stanford University.
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 23:26:55 GMT

In article <1992Sep7.180024.632@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> pdl2r@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Peter D. Lauren) writes:
>-GB tried to divert money from public transportation to extending roads for
>more private motor vehicles.

Try again.  Public transportation in the US is subsidized.  There's
no money to divert.  The closest that you can get to "divert" is
"don't give it the subsidies that it has grown to depend on", although
I suspect that the reality is closer to "don't give it the increase
in subsidies that its advocates want".

>-GB has opposed funding for the development of the magnetrain which has been
>developed very successfully in Japan.  It is much faster, much more efficient
>and much less polluting than private cars.

The "faster, more efficient, less polluting" labels are true of trains
in general.  Their other properties don't make up for those advantages
for many uses, so they aren't used for those uses.

Precisely what "development" funding is necessary if the Japanese have
already developed and used MagLev trains successfully?  We have the
same laws of physics that they do.  Why can't we just import and their
trains as is (installing and using their power cables)?  After all,
it's not like we have to convert them to put the driver's seat on the
left side, as is required with cars; there's very little that is
inherently Japanese (as opposed to American) about trains other than
(possibly) track gauge, and if we're building a new track for these
wonder trains, guage isn't a problem?  Could it be that these systems
won't work with different population distribution?  Oops.

Whenever I see a "wouldn't it be great to have <transport option>
between <two points>/<in area>, it will cost <money, usually $500
million is the low ball amount althouth $5B is also common>", I always
figure out the fare required to pay for the "investment" and the
staffing.  That exercise always puts "it's more efficient" in
perspective.

As long as efficient public transportation has to be subsidized by
supposedly less efficient automobile use ....

-andy
--
UUCP:    {arpa gateways, sun, decwrl, uunet, rutgers}!cs.stanford.edu!andy
ARPA:    andy@cs.stanford.edu
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:4811 alt.fan.dan-quayle:3729
From: steve@celia.UUCP (Steve Tyree)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Clinton Screws Up! Press Reports It!
Date: 14 Sep 92 21:52:37 GMT
Reply-To: celia!steve@usc.edu (Steve Tyree)
Organization: Rhythm & Hues, Inc., Hollywood

In article <1992Sep12.045851.19302@panix.com> eck@panix.com (Mark Eckenwiler) writes:
->In <1937@celia.UUCP>, celia!steve@usc.edu sez:
->> By the way, do you "elightened" quayle bashers realiase that Dan usually
->>reads from a speech. Is it not possible that he said it the way the speech
->>writers intended him to say it. Why on earth would they ever do that ?
->> "Born Free as Free as the Grass Grows....."
->> Do I need to spell this one out or have you got it yet ?
->
->It's obvious.  You think that Marilyn Fitzwater-Quayle is in fact Elsa
->the lion cub, with Dan playing the role of Patti Patti the rock hyrax.
->
->What *I* want to know is which member of the Second Family gets to be
->portrayed by Kam Fong.

 Not even close. It has nothing to do with the actual movie. Just the lyrics
and just the sounds. Back to the chalkboard you go.

 Steve Tyree - These opinions are mine and mine alone.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh