From: starbuck@galaxy.ucr.edu (starbuck)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.women
Subject: Re: What can we expect from President Hillary Clinton?
Date: 23 Jan 93 17:19:56 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization: University of California, Riverside

Two for the price of one was the topic of letters to the editor, talk shows,
pundits and commentators at one time or another.  It was a topic that early
in the campaign that the Clinton Camp found would not fly.  Hillary then
went "underground" so to speak not long after she insulted many women with
her "cookie" comment.  As an aside her speech to the graduating class of
92 at her alma mater as shown on C-Span was "wimpy".  So "wimpy" she should
have stayed home.

Now she is comming above ground with an office in the White House being given
a position of "power" and "control" over policy.  I believe it is againist the
law for the president to appoint a spouse to a position in the government, so
the Clitons will "skirt" the law by making the position unpaid.  (Did he take
an oath to uphold an protect the Constitution? I guess with Yuppies they can
"redefine" anything they want.)  

Hillery will be a problem.  Not because she is a women but because she is
Hillery.  Many people don't like her, the find her offensive, and that is
without much national attention to her personality and beliefs.  I believe
she will cause problems for Clinton where none would exist without her.
The public is pissed and I for one do not feel the Clinton's have a clue
as to why.  They listen to special interests of their choice and those
special interests are of the social engineering type.  With all the hype
about being for the common person they will not listen to them. 

Not being on the White House staff, Hillery will cause problem because she
does not have an official position.  Will she butt in to other area's of
operation that are headed by others?  If so will she have the right to
veto the suggestions and policy of others?  Where does she fit in the
chain of command?  Will Congress be able to call her to testitfy?  What if
she breaks the law in her zeal?  What if she fails?  One would think that
this was not well thought out.  

The press and feminist women have jacked her up with their expectations.
No one knows if she can live up to it.  Remember she was not elected
nor appointed, she has her job only because she is Mrs. Bill Clinton,
no more no less.  She did not get it of her own volition unless it was
through private talks with Bill.  They took a big risk that they did not
have to.  

The press and the feminst have made Hillery to be the first "First Lady"
to ever do anything of value.  (Much like the whine they make about when
will a women be on the National Ticket.  Like they don't remember Mondale's
running mate.  Her idenity seems to have been forgotton). I have two words 
for those of that belief. Eleanor Roosevelt.  Hillery may have done much
in her life but she is pale to Eleanor Roosevelt.  Of course selective 
reading of history is the forte of the feminist, Yuppie and PC devotee.

Well the deed is done and their is not much anyone can do to stop it.
Clinton would not have got elected had he made public that Hillery was
going to be Co-President.  Their will be much resentment about this
and it may be one of the many things to bring down his administration
and those associated with him and Hillery.

I just wonder if Hillery will be anything but a rock around Bill's neck.

starbuck