HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: linstee@dutecaj.et.tudelft.nl (Erik van Linstee)
Subject: Re: PLEASE SOMEBODY ANSWER THIS!!!
Organization: Delft University of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 13:28:34 GMT

Reboot from you diskettes. When (with disk1) os/2 asks
if you want to continue installation. Press ESC to get
a command line. Insert disk 2 with chkdsk on it.
Type chkdsk /f:3 <drive> from drive a: and wait for
chkdsk to finish. This should fix your problems.

Erik



-- 
Erik van Linstee   |   Delft University of Technology   |   I'll be back ... 
----
   We are god, 'cause only we can create the idea of his existence
   in our holy brains...  (Yello)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: imbri_m@oswald.cs.odu.edu (<NeuRoN BaSHEr!>)
Subject: Trident SVGA and Lockup.
Organization: Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 17:43:43 GMT

Hi.  I have 2 questions here... well maybe more, but 2 base questions.. :)

1.  After installing the Trident 1024x768x256 drivers, (from Trident) my 
    lockup command doesn't seem to work correctly.  It will tell me that I
    have 3 incorrect password attempts even after the first try!  Is this a 
    bug, or just my bad luck?

2.  Is there anyway to run Seamless windows in 1024x768 mode?  I would like 
    to use the higher resolution modes, but I would also like to get back my
    seamless windows.. HELP!  <If I can't, what is the highest mode I CAN run
    Seamless in?>

Thanks in advance..

Mark Imbriaco

imbri_m@cs.odu.edu

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2
From: umnoor@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Nasir Ahmed Noor)
Subject: Re: Some OS/2 Related Questions...
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 06:47:05 GMT

sal8@po.cwru.edu (Steve Luzynski) writes:
>It really doesn't matter so much...This seems to be a common hangup amongst 
>DOS migratees (along with disk fragmentation).

:-) !!!

--nasir

p.s. Thanks for help.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: hafting@Lise.Unit.NO (Helge Hafting)
Subject: Re: DOS_DPMI_API setting?
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 15:57:58 GMT

In article <1992Nov7.105019.24606@ousrvr.oulu.fi>, weasel@rieska.oulu.fi (Kari T. Salmela) writes:
 > 
 > I installed service pack about week ago, and now started WIN/OS2
 > for the first time. Except that it would not start, just saying
 > it could not connect to DPMI server and suggested me to change
 > value in DOS_DPMI_API to _ENABLED_. I looked at manual pages, I
 > tried to find the setting etc to no avail. Man page says it's in
 > DOS settings on _Settings_, but at least at my PC it is not. Am
 > I just plain stupid or what gives?
 > 
 > Any pointers highly appreciated.

Click on the win-os2 object with the second mouse button.
Choose "open->settings" in the menu.  You will then get a notebook,
choose the page called "session..."
On this page there is a button labeled "win-os2 settings".  Press it, and you
will get a scrollable list of settings.  One of them should
be DOS_DPMI_API.  (Strange name, DPMI means "Dos Protected Mode Interface",
so this is "dos dos protected mode interface application program interface").
Select this setting, and you will be able to set it to enabled, disabled or
auto.  Choose enabled or auto.  Also make sure that the DPMI memory limit
is sufficiently large.  2 or 3 should do, more if you want to run
memory-hungry windows programs.
-- 
 |  |      ^         |  |      /   ^   o
 |__| _   /|  _  _   |__| _   /|  /|   |    _   _
 |  |/_) / | / \/_)  |  |/ | /-+-/-+- /| /|/ | / \
 |  |\__/  |/\_/\_   |  |\_|/  |   \_/ |/ |  |/\_/
            __/                /              __/
From: kevinc@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca (Kevin Crocker)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: TE/2 with high speed modems
Date: 6 Nov 92 18:51:15 GMT

jws@iastate.edu (James William Shoemaker) writes:

>I use TE/2 with Zmodem all the time and get respectable throughput
>(around 1000 k/s +- 100k/s). What did you not like about te/2 that your
>DOS program gave you, I moved from Procomm + to TE/2 and don't miss anything.

Well, I just tried TE/2 again with my new Supra and I ended up getting
1650cps transfer rates.  Nice!  I think I'll keep it!

Kevin
--
Kevin "autark" Crocker (Athabasca University)
kevinc@cs.AthabascaU.CA  -or-  risk@cs.AthabascaU.CA
From: kwoelfel@sumax.seattleu.edu (Kimball Woelfel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Try this (I *LOVE* OS/2 2.x) ...
Date: 6 Nov 92 05:40:15 GMT
Organization: Seattle University, Seattle WA

In article <steveh.720844299@godzilla.cgl.citri.edu.au> steveh@cgl.citri.edu.au (Steven Hayes) writes:
>jws@iastate.edu (James William Shoemaker) writes:
>
>>	I use TE/2 with Zmodem all the time and get respectable throughput
>>(around 1000 k/s +- 100k/s).  What did you not like about te/2 that your
>>DOS program gave you, I moved from Procomm + to TE/2 and don't miss anything.
>
>Isn't TE/2's VT100 emulation real bad?

 I thought so.  went back to Procomm + myself because of the TE/2 VT100 emulation.  yuck!
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2
From: umnoor@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Nasir Ahmed Noor)
Subject: The Confusions of ALL OS/2 UPDATES
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 23:42:49 GMT


Hi,
I am sure there will be a good many number of OS/2 users who are totally 
confused by all the floods of updates. CSD, udpate packages, DLL updates
etc etc. If IBM wasn't sure of bug fixes, why did they released it in the
first place? Also, why there is no official notification of updates ?

There also seems to be a lack of guidance for novice users like myself.
I was browsing thru the directories of hobes and found that there is a 
whole dirctory filled with updated and fixes. No who is to tell that which
one are for which problem and which ones are really worth applying. 

Then there is new CSD. What does it do any way. Every day there are a few
reports on usenet that problems/performance got worse after applying CSD.
Now who is to ask about that? What problems does it fix and when is it
worth applying...????

--nasir
umnoor@ccu.umanitoba.ca
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: kitchin@avo.hp.com (Bruce Kitchin)
Subject: Re: Window Washer
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara Division
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 16:52:40 GMT

All inclusive directory on hobbes??

Have you looked at 00Index in directory pub/os2.  I usually download it
and then with a local editor search for what I'm looking for.  I find
this approach much more satisfactory than any online search scheme
I've encountered.  Since they already do it, it doesn't ask for more
of the probably overworked sysop(s) of hobbes.
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Does VESA Local Bus put a huge strain on a CPU?
Date: 5 Nov 92 08:38:32 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <Bx63uw.JrD@news.cso.uiuc.edu> nap42487@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Nishith A. Patel) writes:
>dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:
>>ISA runs at a theoretical 8MHz at a 16-bit datapath, making an
>>effective 16MB per second if every bus-cycle would be used.  This is
>>almost never the case, though.  Most ISA machines max out at about
>>5-10MB/s.  The fastest I've ever seen an ISA card do was 4MB/s.  I
>>think a bus-mastering card can approach the maximum speed, since it
>>can shut the CPU out of the bus.

One minor correction: ISA can only access the bus every other clock
cycle, so an 8MB computer has a theoretical maximum at 8MB/s, not 16.

>>LocalBus, I believe, is 32-bits wide, and runs at the CPU's internal
>>speed.  This would deliver a theoretical 100MB/s if every clock was
>>used for transfer.  This, just like with MCA and ISA, is unrealistic.
>>I think you can expect about 20-50MB/s with an LB slot and an LB card
>>that keeps the CPU and other cards off the bus.
>
>Now one thing I don't understand: If MCA can come close to its theoretical
>peformance of 20, 40, or 80 MB/s, depending on the card, then why can't LB
>do the same if it does the ideal things that MCA does to reach the limit?
>if LB can theoreticsally get 100 MB/s, why is the expected only 20-50 if it
>does everything right? What is it wasting all those clock cycles on

It probably could, but the CPU would be doing nothing but servicing
the bus every clock cycle.  And there's the other problem that your
RAM won't be able to keep up with 100MB/s, since most RAM is about
60-80ns.  With bus-mastering devices, it is theoretically possible for
two cards to talk to each other at full speed while the CPU goes off
and does something else.

>And if LB is running at 33 MHz, isn't the max more than 100 MB/s?

LB runs at processor speed.  I was assuming a 25MHz system, such as
the one I have.  (No, my system is not LB).


-- 
David Charlap         |"there aren't 50,000 things for which it's worth writing
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu| software; and the computer industry doesn't have enough
----------------------+ programmers to create that much good software.
Therefore, most of it must be worthless" -- Boris Beizer "The Frozen Keyboard"
From: twong@civil.ubc.ca (Thomas Wong)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Logitech mouse driver?
Date: 5 Nov 1992 19:51:25 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Civil Engineering, U.B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: sam.civil.ubc.ca


Hello everyone. I was wondering if there is a Logitech Mouse Driver
available for OS/2 2.0. Reason I ask is because right now, I have a bus
Mouseman and I've installed OS/2 with the bus mouse driver and it works
fine. But I have some DOS programs that uses the middle button which
doesn't work (since this is the generic bus mouse driver so it can only 
assume 2 buttons). So I was wondering if Logitech themselves came out
with OS/2 2.0 drivers. Thanks in advance.

Thomas.

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: Volker.Stegmann@arbi.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de (Volker Stegmann)
Subject: How do I get 256 colors in the Background ?
Organization: University of Oldenburg, Germany
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 12:23:04 GMT

I've installed OS/2 2.0 and the 800x600x256 drivers that comes with the
Service Pack. I'm using a Speedstar Hicolor Card based on a ET4000 Chip.
When I try to set a picture in the background of the WPS I only get 16
colors. On the other side I get 256 colors in a windowed Windows-session.

Does someone know how to fix this ?
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: wkristle@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Bill Kristler)
Subject: Boot from Drive a:
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 00:10:25 GMT

	I have a problem that has me confused. I can't seam to get my 
copy(installed that is) of os/2 to run a dos disk from drive A: or from an
dos image. I've follow the instructions in the book and on-line. It
doesn't seam to work. It always crashes with an invalid instruction from 
notice from the cpu. My room mate tried the exact same thing on his computer,
his works perfect! The only major diference that I can think of is that he
did a selective install and I did a full. Hardware wise he has an AMD cpu
while I have an Intel, but that shouldn't matter. If you have any idea's for
me please e-mail me as not to take up newsgroup space.

Thanks in advance.

-Bill
-- 
* I must create a System, or                * Bill Kristler    
* be enslaved by another Man's              *    Internet:      
* I will not Reason and Compare:            * wkristle@sage.cc.purdue.edu
* my business is to Create.  -William Blake * Packet: n9lwh@k9iu.in.usa.na 
Lines: 10
Date: Thu,  5 Nov 92 16:02:12 MST
From: earlyd@newt.ee.byu.edu (David Early)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Distribution: world
Organization: Brigham Young University, Provo UT USA
Subject: What is the verdict on the CSD/SP??



What is the verdict? does it cause more problems than it is
worth?  Everyone has various complaints, but did it solve
anything??  Did IBM boo-boo big time?


Just wondering

Dave Early
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: ericwolf@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Eric Wolf)
Subject: DeskPict Full Screen
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 00:23:49 GMT


Concerning the DeskPict screen saver program located at ftp-os2, is theere
a way to run the program so that it runs as an animated background AND get
your folders to appear, too??  I think it would be REALLY nice to operate
OS/2 and have the animated background running together (with me being able
to get to my folders!)

Thanks for any info you can provide.

- Eric
  ericwolf@mentor.cc.purdue.edu

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rcashman@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Robert Cashman)
Subject: Trident Seamless Drivers.
Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 02115, USA
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 17:08:39 GMT

  I'd like some input on what seamless drivers are available for Trident
video boards.  Are there any 256 color seamless drivers out now?  What
are the future plans?  Actually what would be best would be a list of
current drivers available. (size, colors, seamless, virtual).  And what
will hopefully be available in 32 bit.  (same info).
Thanks.

--Robert Cashman
  Northeastern University.
From: ggerard@alex (Greg Gerard)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: beta CD
Date: 10 Nov 92 01:37:31 GMT
Organization: Trinity University, San Antonio TX, USA

We recently received the OS/2 Beta CD and have installed the beta version.
Note:  IBM hasn't shipped us our master copies of OS/2 and so we have no
manuals.  What should we do -- wait for the manuals, plunge ahead and install
the CSD (can I on top of the beta?), install 2.0 GA (also on the CD) and with it
the Service Pack or what?  We also have a Tseng graphics board on local bus.
What should we do about video (ie -- the many conflicting stories on how to
install these drivers is very disheartening.)

thanks,

greg
From: josephc@cco.caltech.edu (Joseph Chiu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS2+VIO windows=110baud
Date: 11 Nov 1992 03:12:03 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu

Those of you who are having CRAWLING windowed sessions, check to see if 
your CONFIG.SYS contains a PRIORITY=ABSOLUTE line.  If it does, it may
be the reason for the slow performance.  In my own particular case, setting
PRIORITY=ABSOLUTE made windowed sessions go at a snail's pace.

(The default is to leave the line out, or PRIORITY=DYNAMIC)


-- 
Joseph Chiu, Dept. of Computer Science, Caltech.    josephc@coil.caltech.edu
1-57 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91126. +1 818 449 5457 
* Now running OS/2, the best software that $89 can buy! (I want TCP/IP/X!) *
From: pfr@drsrv1.hmi.de (Fritsch_Wolfgang)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Speedstar sync problem also w 800 resolution
Date: 5 Nov 92 15:54:24 GMT
Organization: Hahn-Meitner-Institut Berlin GmbH


When following the discussion in this group about problems with the
higher resolutions of the Diamond Speedstar, it is probably not only _my_
impression that things are getting more confusing every day.
Some insist on special ways to install the driver, besides running
selective install after application of the SP. Some insist that
SVGA should be run in a Dos _window_... Can somebode PLEASE summarize?
Somebody with authority please (Tim?).

I made the new(?) experience that there is a problem also with the
800*600 resolution (which is _not_ mentioned in the IBM readme file).
So here I go. I installed the SP over a brandnew GA. Then I went to
selective install (also changed U.K. settings to U.S. settings) and
installed SVGA. When asked I clicked on 800*600.

I then went to a full screened Dos session, ran the VMODE MONITOR, with
the settings for the Nanao 9080i (at 800*600 it has 72 Hz vertical
non-interlaced). Then SVGA ON. Exit and boot.

Guess what? Blank screen instead of the WPS. So I also installed the
setmode.bat sequence as suggested by IBM, only with VMODE 30 for this
800*600 resolution. Now things come up, but the screen is flickering,
probably interlaced although I have no way of proving. 

Please, who really knows?

Wolfgang Fritsch
pfr@psun2.hmi.de

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: vargish@sura.net (Nick Vargish)
Subject: Re: Install OS/2 from driver B
Summary: "installb.zoo"
Organization: SURAnet, College Park, MD, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 13:29:28 GMT

Birdy Array (root)) writes:

> I want to install OS/2 from driver B. It's said on FAQ that I can get a
> free software to do it. Where is it???

There is a two-disk set called "installb" made available by IBM. It
allows one to install OS/2 from a 3.5" B: drive if you can't swap the
5.25" A: drive. You need to have a high density (1.2M) 5.25" A: drive
and a 1.44M B: drive. It involves creating two "bootstrap" 5.25" disks
and booting from the A: drive, then the 5.25" disks transfer the
install process to B:.

On hobbes, the file is called "instb.zip" -- getting this file will
result in FRUSTRATION! Some fool archived it with the zip utility that
runs under OS/2; it CAN NOT be unzipped with the official DOS pkunzip
release -- you must already have OS/2 running to unzip it. A real 
catch 22. 

Try looking for "installb.zoo", which can be unpacked with any
zoo archive utility. I think there is one on software.watson.ibm.com
in the "patch" directory, or try looking for it with archie.

If you need more help, feel free to e-mail. The procedure worked fine
for me. You may want to try calling IBM -- if you register your GA
over the phone, they'll mail you the disks for free (I ordered mine
Monday morning and they arrived on Wednesday, though I found the file
by ftp between then).

> Thanks for your help...

No problem.

Nick

p.s. Strongest advertising for OS/2 I can think of: "It's not
Micro$haft... and it works GREAT!"

-- 
|  Nick Vargish       |                N O N   S E R V I A M                  |
|  SURAnet Operations +-------------------------------------------------------+
|  vargish@sura.net   |  I wasn't hired to speak for SURAnet, and if my boss  |
|  h: 301 474-1863    |  thought I was trying to do so, she'd laugh at me...  |
From: zhao@unixg.ubc.ca (Jiansheng Zhao)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Cann't run gcc:sys1808
Date: 7 Nov 92 22:04:06 GMT
Organization: The University of British Columbia
NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca


In order to run gcc under os/2, I reinstalled os/2 (HPFS), and 
unpacked gccbin.zoo, gcclib.zoo and gcchdr.zoo. It seems all files
are at the right place. However, I have trouble to compile the simplest
C program.
1). I added d:\gcc\bin to autoexec.bat (my os/2 is on D: drive),
however, os/2 cann't find d:\gcc\bin\gcc.exe, no matter how I tried.
2). When running "gcc sample.c" under d:\gcc\bin, I got the following
error message:
"abnormal program termination.
SYS 1808:
The process has stopped. The software diagnostic code (exception code)
is 0006".
I set CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=d:/gcc/g++-include; ... ...
What might be the probelm?  
I just start learning C programing, please help.


-- 
Jiansheng Zhao
Dept. Chem. Eng, Univ. of B. C., Canada. V6T 1Z4
zhao@unixg.ubc.ca
From: da_maha@pavo.concordia.ca (MAHAR, DEREK A.)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: $15 OS/2 CDROM PDK
Date: 12 Nov 92 18:50:00 GMT
Organization: Concordia University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


Does anyone know the part number of the OS/2 CDROM Programmer's Development
Kit?  I need the Canadian number since IBM USA will not ship it to Canada.  It
seems IBM's Canadian offices are not at all familiar with this product.

DEREK

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: MVOLPERS@CIPVAX.BIOLAN.UNI-KOELN.DE (Markus Volpers)
Subject: Re: Service pack - "extent not found"
Organization: BIOLAN - COLOGNE UNIVERSITY (FRG)
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 92 21:14:50 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.22

In <720842766snx@ananke.stgt.sub.org> ak@ananke.stgt.sub.org writes:

> Still the same bug, even in the service pack. When some mailer
> (Binkley, UUPC) has logfiles on HPFS opened when the system crashes,
> the HPFS CHKDSK informs me about
> 	... minor file system error
> 	... corrected an allocation error ...
> for each of those files. But no matter how often the CHKDSK runs, these
> error still show up. The next access to one of those files will crash
> the system with "extent not found". I tried every /F option of CHKDSK,
> no effect. The only way to repair this bug is to run OS/2 1.3 (!) and
> run its CHKDSK.
> 
> 		Gruss, Andreas
> 
> :::::::::::::::::::: subnet:  ak@ananke.stgt.sub.org
> :: Andreas Kaiser :: fidonet: 2:241/7220.9
> ::::::::::::::::::::

After installing the CSD over OS/2 GA my system crashes 3 times a day with
the "CPS: extent not found"-message. This problem never occured using the
GA-code. Has anyone, any ideas?

Markus


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.apps
From: anto@dutetvd.tudelft.nl (Anto Daryanto)
Subject: HELP!!!  My mouse is dissapeared in WinOS2.....
Organization: Delft University of Technology
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 08:19:27 GMT

Hi guys, here I am again with another problem. 

I've installed SP (twice, for some reason!) and the problem is WinOS2, again!
I start full screen WinOS2 and I use PM4 and WinFax Pro in it. Then I have
to go back to Desktop and then again to WinOS2. 

Well, guess what, I lost the  control of my mouse. All of the
applications are running and you can use it with keyboard (not quite
handy, isn't it?).

If I switch back to dekstop I get the mouse back but not if I get back to 
WinOS2. Any idee what is happening? The only way to get my mouse back
is to kill WinOS2 and start it all over again.

Well, can I still say 'cheers'.....?
Anto

--
Delft University of Technology,		|
Faculty of Electrical Engineering,    	| **********************************
Telecommunication- and Traffic-		|   **  Happy user of OS/2 2.0  **
Control Systems Group			| **********************************
					|
E-Mail: a.daryanto@dutetvd.et.tudelft.nl
From: furballs@sequent.com (Paul Penrod)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: NEC CDR84/74 and OS/2
Date: 8 Nov 92 08:28:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: sequent.1992Nov8.082847.18092
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc.

Can anyone tell me if the NEC CDR84 or CDR74 CD-ROMS are supported
under OS/2 2.0. Supposedly NT supports these, but I have not been
able to find anyone to confirm whether OS/2 does.

Thanks in advance.

...Paul

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
            Bureaucracy: noun, plural - Bureaucracies.
         The process of turning energy into solid waste.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: DOS version of pathalias won't run
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 17:55:27 GMT

In article <qPayTB1w165w@lakes.trenton.sc.us> owen@lakes.trenton.sc.us (UN Owen) writes:
>I have a DOS version of pathalias that, according to the docs, was 
>compiled under GCC.  I have run it before installing OS/2, but 
>from a VDM session I get a message saying the system must be in 
>real mode and not v86 mode.  Is there anyway to run a program like 
>this from within OS/2?

The DOS version of GCC using a memory extender which is incompatible
with OS/2 (or Windows, for that matter).  However, that utility may
have been ported to OS/2 -- check ftp-os2.nmsu.edu via anonymous ftp.
Or you may wish to obtain an alternative.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST 2.0g is avail.
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [You picked the right President, America -- Thanks.]