HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: julian@tfs.com (Julian Elischer)
Subject: Re: [386BSD] more than 16MB?
Organization: TRW Financial Systems
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 20:33:41 GMT

In article <1if0p8INNfau@Germany.EU.net> bs@Germany.EU.net (Bernard Steiner) writes:
>In article <C0EHx0.qr@space.physics.uiowa.edu>, ljg@space.physics.uiowa.edu (Larry Granroth) writes:
>> Is anyone out there running 386bsd on an ISA-bus machine with more than
>> 16MB ram?
>
>Yes. I've seen a machine with 20MB and heard of one with 64 MB
>(yes, sixty-four) No, not me...
I doubt this very much


The problem is that for reasons not obvious (but real) the kernel
is compiled for FE000000. This is 32MB below the top
of the address space. The kernel for 0.1 requires that it map
the entire physical address space above this address, PLUS some other
areas that are mapped in a non 1:1 manner (e.g. raw-IO address translation
buffers)
the upshot of this is that 386BSD can only make use of (32 - X)MB of real
ram (where X is an unknown number) 20MB certainly works.

0.2 solves this shortcoming by some rather ingenious means.

>
>> Does 386bsd support this?
>
>Looks like it.
20 works, 24 may work.. after that I doubt it.
(bill has some special compiles for >> 32MB but they require several
patches and 0.2 should solve the problem properly)

>
>> Does it (does it need to?) support
>> DMA above 16MB?
>
>No idea. I'd be interested in the answer, though.
for floppy, the dma is supplimented by a bounce buffer.
for SCSI it is not.
however the EISA scsi drivers do support 32 bit adresses. so bounce buffers
are not needed.
>
>-Bernard


julian
+----------------------------------+       ______ _  __
|   __--_|\  Julian Elischer       |       \     U \/ / On assignment
|  /       \ julian@tfs.com        +------>x   USA    \ in a very strange
| (   OZ    ) 2118 Milvia st. Berkeley CA. \___   ___ | country !
+- X_.---._/  USA+(510) 704-3137(wk)           \_/   \\            
          v


Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: cflatter@nrao.edu (Chris Flatters)
Subject: Re: [386bsd] gcc 2.3.2/2.3.3 compile solution
Reply-To: cflatter@nrao.edu
Organization: NRAO
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 93 22:34:05 GMT

In article 5674@mav.com, rick@mav.com (Hendrik Groeneveld) writes:
>In article <RICH.92Dec27171213@superego.Rice.edu> Rich@rice.edu writes:
>>>>>>> In article <BLYMN.92Dec27161320@siren.awadi.com.au>, blymn@awadi.com.au (Brett Lymn) writes:
>>>>>>> On 20 Dec 92 00:43:03 GMT, dhess@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Drew William Hess) said:
>>D> I'm having problems getting gcc 2.3.2 to compile under 386bsd.  It's choking
>>D> on enquire.c, line 2303, and complaining about a floating point constant
>>D> being out of range.  Can someone please post or email me a fix?  Thanks.
>
>The problem is not a floating constant out of range. The problem
>is a floating point stack overflow. To get passed this, manually
>compile fold-const.c using -S in place of -c. Edit fold-const.s
>and replace "fsts" with "fstps" in _real_value_truncate. Then
>assemble (as -o fold-const.o fold-const.s). 

I didn't get this problem but I have had problems with the macro DBL_MAX.
It turns out that the values of DBL_MAX and DBL_MIN are one digit too
short in /usr/include/float.h: this is a problem since DBL_MAX is
rounded to the next highest digit and is therefore larger than the
maximum representable double.  The float.h generated by fixincludes also
has a wrong value for DBL_MAX.  The correct values for the DBL_* macros are

#define DBL_MANT_DIG    53
#define DBL_EPSILON     2.2204460492503131E-16
#define DBL_DIG         15
#define DBL_MIN_EXP     (-1021)
#define DBL_MIN         2.2250738585072014E-308
#define DBL_MIN_10_EXP  (-307)
#define DBL_MAX_EXP     (+1024)
#define DBL_MAX         1.7976931348623157E+308
#define DBL_MAX_10_EXP  (+308)

>
>There is also a circular dependancy for protoize.o/unprotoize.o in the
>Makefile. Add the lines
>
>	touch protoize.o
>	touch unprotoize.o
>
>after the line
>
>	touch stamp-proto
>
>After this "make bootstrap" will run to completion.

I think that the makefile will work without modification if you have GNU make
installed.

	Chris Flatters
	cflatter@nrao.edu

Xref: sparky comp.unix.bsd:11183 comp.lang.c:19605
From: jmd@wa4cyb.UUCP (John Dashner)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: a unix terminal question
Date: 12 Jan 93 12:30:25 GMT
Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd,comp.lang.c
Organization: John Dashner & Assoc.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]

D.P. Suresh (dps@delhi.esd.sgi.com) wrote:
: 

	[stuff deleted from terry@weber.edu]

: 
: 	/* We shall specify 0.5 sec as the waiting time */
: 	timeout.tv_sec  = 0;	/*   0 seconds */
: 	timeout.tv_usec = 500;	/* 500 microseconds */
                          ^^^
I agree entirely with Terry and DP Suresh about all that has been said
but would like to point out in the code fragment above, that .tv_usec
is being set in this example to 5/10,000ths of a second rather than
.5 seconds as alleged.  It would need to be: timeout.tv_usec = 500000;
to achieve the goals as stated in the comment preceding this fragment.

Some systems support a reasonable ``cbreak'' mode that in effect returns
control to a process as each character is typed.  Depending on the needs
as speculated on by Terry that you have in mind, this mode may be all
that you need.  Your 'man' pages should have a discussion about the
kinds of serial support you have.
From: admerlev@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Arnd Merlevede)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Anywhere NN -  binaries (386BSD) ?
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 20:12:26 GMT
Organization: CSD., University of Erlangen
NNTP-Posting-Host: faui00c.informatik.uni-erlangen.de

Subject says it all. Can you help ?
Thanx a lot
Arnd

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Subject: [386bsd] ATI's e-mail address
Keywords: X server
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Distribution: comp.unix.bsd
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 20:50:16 GMT

I think that ATI is now selling their documentations for their 
MACH 8 chipset, so for anyone interested in working on XBSD8514, here 
is the e-mail for ATI:

From: anthony@cibbs.UUCP (Anthony Quinn)
Subject: ATI Problems - send email to ATI

If anyone has difficulties with ATI products, one can also email ATI about
it. Their email address is:

    74740.667@compuserve.com


Have fun,
Amancio



-- 
This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3
Amancio Hasty           |  
Home: (415) 495-3046    |  ftp-site depository of all my work:
e-mail hasty@netcom.com	|  sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: moose@aoa.aoa.utc.com (Bruce Trvalik)
Subject: driver for Adaptec 1522
Organization: Adaptive Optics Associates
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 18:15:41 GMT

Does anyone know if there is a driver for an adaptec 1522 SCSI adapter.
Or would it be difficult to port another one...?
Thanks


-- 
*	Bruce Trvalik  AOA-----------------*
*       (617)864-0201   A mind is a terrible thing to loose - D. Qaaele (ha!)
*	moose@aoa.utc.com
From: chapman@acf3.NYU.EDU (Gary W. Chapman, , , )
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: [386BSD] corrupt files
Date: 5 Jan 93 23:05:00 GMT
Organization: New York University

After downloading 386BSD from agate.berkeley.edu (and from another place
as well), I get 

bin01.02 is corrupt
bin01.03 is corrupt

when doing 'extract'.  What can I do?

- Gary Chapman, chapman@nyu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: adrian@rachel.ibmpcug.co.uk (Adrian Hall)
Subject: Re: encrypted passwds on 386bsd
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:40:57 GMT

gambert@screamer.csee.usf.edu (Allen Gambert) writes:
> I remember reading awhile back on how to add encryption in the passwd file.
> I lost the copy of the file and I would know like to add this feature.
> 
> Does anyone know how this can be done?  Do I just need to add the crypt function
> to one of the libraries and then change the login program so it calls 
> getpass.  I would then crypt the passwd and then compare it to the encrypted 
> copy in the passwd file.  Is this all I need to do or is there more.  Any help
> would be appreciated.

Look in the file /usr/386bsd.errata/crypt.instructions from the
standard distribution.

Adrian
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adrian Hall				Telephone: +44 (0)81 863 1191
Connect Systems Manager			Fax:	   +44 (0)81 863 6095
The IBM PC User Group			Internet:  adrian@ibmpcug.co.uk
From: avg@rodan.UU.NET (Vadim Antonov)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: INTERNATIONALIZATION: JAPAN, FAR EAST
Date: 8 Jan 1993 16:42:09 -0500
Organization: UUNET Technologies Inc, Falls Church, VA
NNTP-Posting-Host: rodan.uu.net
Keywords: Han Kanji Katakana Hirugana ISO10646 Unicode Codepages

In article <"our.bsdi.clip".1993Jan8.072720.9554@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes:

>[stuff deleted]

I admit that i'm giving up. It is useless to argue against a person who
makes illogical statements. My life philoshophy includes a point on not
preventing people from learning on their own mistakes if they're unable
to learn on past mistakes of other people.

Go on, Terry. Prove the that you're wizard you claim to be. I have a
better ways of killing my time than arguing with you.

--vadim
From: knier@miller.cs.uwm.edu (Robert Knier )
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Julians Drivers
Date: 5 Jan 1993 04:53:44 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.9.13

	Would anyone know were I can get a copy of Julian's SCSI drivers?


Thanks,

Bob Knier
From: beattie@agora.rain.com (Brian Beattie)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: Dumb Terry
Keywords: Han Kanji Katakana Hirugana ISO10646 Unicode Codepages insults personal_attacks
Date: 7 Jan 93 17:16:09 GMT
Organization: Open Communications Forum


Who pissed on your Post Toasties?

Sir if you wish disscuss a techincal subject in a constructive manner I
would suggest you refrain from personal attacks.  You might also consider
that calling Americans "dumb" will not raise the level of rationality of
your argument and in fact will lead many to disregard you postings as the
rantings of a hopeless xenophobe.  And anyway dumb means "unable to speak"
which is not infact relevent to this disscussion.

In fact it is quite clear that in your opinion there does not and exist a
solution to the problem that will work for you.  If you have a solution I
would suggest you present it to the network.  Otherwise futher discussion
is pointless.

beattie@agora.rain.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: GSPIEGEL@bsa3.kent.edu (Greg Spiegelberg)
Subject: BSD/DOS box
Keywords: install
Organization: Kent State University, School of Business Administration
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 16:25:44 GMT

I'm somewhat new to the UNIX/BSD world and need to know if I can have BSD 
and DOS 5.0 running on the same machine and how.

Here's my system:

	386/33 MHz 
	8 Meg RAM
	A: 1.2 floppy
	B: 1.44 floppy
	C: 85 Meg HD (for DOS)
	D: 213 Meg HD (for BSD, hopefully)

Unlikely, but is there anything like a step-by-step FAQ to help me do this?

-----
Greg "TwoTone" Spiegelberg
Internet: gspiegel@bsa1.kent.edu
          gspiegel@chaos.mcs.kent.edu
Bitnet:   blabs586@kentvms.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
Subject: Re: [386bsd] f2c with record/structure support
Keywords: 386bsd, f2c
Organization: Weber State University  (Ogden, UT)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 21:20:52 GMT

In article <1993Jan10.211632.3269@ll.mit.edu> pope@ll.mit.edu (Frank Pope) writes:
>Hi
>
>Does anyone out there know of a f2c translator which has been ported to
>386bsd that has support for fortran records and structures.  I believe
>these are features found in FORTRAN 90 [not sure].  I want to
>convert some software written using MS Fortran 5.1 to c and run it 
>under 386bsd.  Thanks in advance.

I don't know of many compilers, let alone translators, which support '90.

Historically, the ANSI-90 FORTRAN was rejected by most major vendors,
either due to a lack of backward compatability or conflicts with vendor
extensions (depending on the vendor); it was rejected by Harris, DEC,
HP, and IBM... dunno if Sun was involved at all.

The differences are significant enought that you will probably have to
do a fair bit of work to hack the most recent 386BSD translator (ftp'able
from ref.tfs.com).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@icarus.weber.edu
					terry_lambert@novell.com
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        "I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
 Get the 386bsd FAQ from agate.berkeley.edu:/pub/386BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: levinson@halcyon.com (Don Levinson)
Subject: [386bsd] INN or NNTP
Organization: The 23:00 News and Mail Service
Distribution: comp.unix.bsd
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:42:24 GMT

I am preparing to put a news server on my 386bsd machine here, I am working
with potentially limited space, I am on a closed network at the moment and
I do not anticipate ever having more than 3 unix boxes on the network, the news
clients will be Win/QVT-Net on the PC's and ANU-NEWS on the VAXen, so having
said all that can someone recommend a news server for my situation, does
INN provide services transparent to clients expecting to see 
NNTP ?
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Don Levinson	  levinson@halcyon.com	| 	Fatigue Technology Inc.
 "Stupid answers for stupid questions"	| 	100 Andover Park West
    ph:206-246-2010 fax:206-244-9886	| 	Seattle, WA 98188
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
Subject: Re: WordPerfect on 386BSD?
Keywords: wordperfect 386bsd compatibility
Organization: Weber State University  (Ogden, UT)
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 93 21:42:55 GMT

In article <93010913477@erato.iowa-city.ia.us> jdb@erato.iowa-city.ia.us (John D. Boggs) writes:
>
>I can't find anything in the FAQ about compatibility, so I'll offer up
>a question to the net at large.
>
>I want to be able to run WordPerfect on a unix box at home, and the good
>folks at WordPerfect Corporation have apparently never heard of 386BSD.
>So, is 386BSD binary compatible with the commercial flavor of Unix (what
>is that, system 5?)  Has anyone got WordPerfect running on 386BSD?

Nope, not yet; the only binaries that will run on 386BSD that were compiled
to run on another box are the Mach BNR2SS binaries.  Unfortunately, the
Mach BNR2SS is currently defunct (although there is someone beginning to
duplicate CMU's effors in this area by porting 386BSD to run as a hosted
OS on top of Mach (386BSDSS?  8-)).

I don't know what the official word is, but frobbing the system call table
through a pointer on process context switch (least expensive) or making
references relative to some pointer in the proc struct each call (more
expensive) would allows us to run binaries for any system we were willing
to write the system call glue routines for.

WordPerfect, in particular, is a difficult beast, not only because it expects
things to live in particular places (you can overcome that), but because it
likes to access the console (and Wyse-60) hardware with the driver in "scan
code mode".  There are also a lot of expectations about XNwrap, number of
lines, color change escape sequences, etc., etc., which make it very demanding
of the console driver behaviour.

For instance, WP for SCO Xenix would require an entirely new console driver
to run on 386BSD *after* we got all the system calls behaving the same.

If you have X going, there has been a lot of recent work on the WYSIWYG
editor that comes with InterViews(sp?), and that may be your best bet
(unless you didn't want an editor to edit, but just to have WP).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@icarus.weber.edu
					terry_lambert@novell.com
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        "I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
 Get the 386bsd FAQ from agate.berkeley.edu:/pub/386BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: lessen@axion.bt.co.uk (Lee Essen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Where do you start?
Date: 7 Jan 93 10:23:40 GMT
Reply-To: lessen@axion.bt.co.uk (Lee Essen)
Organization: British Telecom Research Labs



I'm fairly new to both the Internet and 386BSD and have been reading this
newsgroup for a while now. I'm very interested in setting up a 386BSD
system but have a couple of problems...

There seem to be thousands of patches (which on it's own is no problem),
but from some of the news articles it seems that some of these have to
be removed for other things to work! If you havn't been following the
development from the beginning how do you know which ones to apply and 
which ones not to apply?

A while ago (before my interest really developed) there was some talk about
a distribution on CD-Rom, consisting of 386BSD, X, source, etc.
Does this exist, what exactly does it contain, and how do I get hold of it?
If not, what other media options are available? (at present ftp is
not a valid option!)

In one of the 386BSD files (I think it's INSTALL.NOTES) it mentions a
book detailing the development of the system. Does this exist yet? and
how do I get hold of this, if not is there an easy way of getting hold
of all the right issues of DDJ (bearing in mind i'm in the UK).

I'm sorry if this shouldn't have been posted here, or is a bit tedious
to the people who are discussing the internals of the kernel...but you
have to start somewhere!!

						Thanks,

						Lee Essen.
From: mark@roissy.umd.edu (Mark Sienkiewicz)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: [386bsd] Help finding an up-to-date kernel
Date: 6 Jan 93 17:59:23 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland

In article <1992Dec26.181623.23786@nwnexus.WA.COM> antoni@halcyon.com (Toni Moreno) writes:
>: It happens that there was an ethernet board I could borrow, but before I 
>: knew that would be the case, I considered buying one for occasions like
>: this.  I don't have my tape drive yet, though, so it would be more cost
>: effective for me than it would be for you.
>
>The problem I've found is that I have a 386DX-33 with an ethernet board,
>an IP address for me ... but what I haven't is knowing of how to set up
>ftp client. I mean how to define all IP addresses of the others'
>machines and so...
>

Here's what you do:

When the system came up, it said the name of your ethernet board.  It was
either ne0 for a novel ne-2000 board or w??0 (I forget exactly) for the
western digital board.

I had a ne-2000 clone, so I used ne0.  In this example, replace all the
'ne0' with whatever board you have.

first, type

	ifconfig ne0 inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 

where you put the internet address you will use for your machine in the
place of the xxx's.  This configures the network software.

Now you just type

	ftp yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy

where you replace yyy's with the ip address of the machine you are going
to get stuff from.  If you don't know the address, most unix machines
have 'nslookup'.  (Your 386bsd machine doesn't (yet)).  For example,

	% nslookup export.lcs.mit.edu

	Name Server:  localhost
	Address:  127.0.0.1

	Non-authoritative answer:
	Name:    export.lcs.mit.edu
	Address:  18.24.0.12

(note that there isn't any 386bsd stuff there. :)

Later, you may want to set up a name server or list machines in /etc/hosts
so your machine can know others by name, but that will be after you get
your install done.

Mark S.
From: kuku@acds.physik.rwth-aachen.de (Christoph Kukulies)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: kern_execve.c (patch)
Date: 12 Jan 1993 16:56:12 GMT
Organization: I.Physikalisches Institut RWTH-Aachen
Distribution: world
Reply-To: kuku@acds.physik.rwth-aachen.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: acds.physik.rwth-aachen.de
Keywords: patch kern_execve.c #!


In article <1993Jan12.033603.1037@netcom.com>, hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) writes:
>Path: urmel.informatik.rwth-aachen.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!hasty
>
>could you make your version of kern_execve.c available somewhere like over
>at ref or your favorite ftp site :-)
>
>Tnks,
>-- 
>

I'll put my current kern_execve.c into ref.tfs.com /usr/home/kuku for everyone's
convenience.

--
--Chris
Christoph P. U. Kukulies
kuku@acds.physik.rwth-aachen.de
*** Error code 1
 
Stop.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: karl@NeoSoft.com (Karl Lehenbauer)
Subject: 386BSD.EXE - Let DOS handle booting?
Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 06:10:04 GMT

Hey, how about making the second stage boot, say Julian's loader, an
executable DOS program?

That way 386BSD wouldn't have to reset the keyboard and do a bunch of
other bootup dinking that is still causing us compatability fits --
DOS could handle it.

Plus people who needed to do weird stuff like config a card could do it
with the DOS utility those companies inevitably provide and, you know,
put it in their AUTOEXEC.BAT.

386BSD.EXE would find the 386BSD partition and load /386bsd in its normal
manner.

The only drawback is you'd need a DOS partition or floppy to do it that
way, no biggie but possibly offensive to purists.

Comments?
-- 
-- Email info@NeoSoft.com for info on getting interactive Internet access.
"In a minute, I'll burp up your droid."
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: randy@chinet.chi.il.us (Randy Suess)
Subject: Re: out of mem
Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 00:03:51 GMT

In article <C0CHCu.5EB@chinet.chi.il.us> I write:
>
>	I seem to be having a major problem lately running out of
>	virtual memory.  

	I should also mention that I am running the korn shell, ksh
	not csh, so the limit command has no effect.  I tried running
	csh, but it didn't help.

-- 
	I am created Shiva the Destroyer; Death, the shatterer of worlds!
	Who is this dog meat who stands before me now?
	That's the biz, sweetheart.
Randy Suess					 randy@chinet.chi.il.us
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva)
Subject: Re: 386BSD.EXE - Let DOS handle booting?
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:25:20 GMT

In article <C0q94w.48p@NeoSoft.com> karl@NeoSoft.com (Karl Lehenbauer) writes:
> Hey, how about making the second stage boot, say Julian's loader, an
> executable DOS program?

This is what Plan 9 does. I was at first repelled and disgusted, but on
reflection it sounds like a really nice idea. It would resolve the Compaq
boot problem, it would resolve the problem of video boards that require
magic DOS configuration programs, it would resolve the "how do I boot
386BSD on a second controller" problem, and so on.

Plus, it'd make it easier to hack around with the boot sequence. You could
build a new boot program without worrying about making your system non-
bootable. You could give it arguments

	bootbsd boot-options where init-options

	bootbsd as1a:386bsd.old
	bootbsd -large wd0a
	bootbsd -debug fd0a
-- 
Peter da Silva                                            `-_-'
Ferranti International Controls Corporation                'U` 
Sugar Land, TX  77487-5012 USA
+1 713 274 5180                            "Zure otsoa besarkatu al duzu gaur?"
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: kovelan@wizards.austin.ibm.com
Subject: does bsd g++ work. 
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 22:15:26 GMT
Reply-To: kovelan@wizards.austin.ibm.com
Organization: IBM Austin

Fellow bsd'ers:	
  
     I tried to use the g++ compiler and found that it was giving me a
"ld" error.  This is not the	
whole error message, I did'nt have it with me at the time of this note. 
 Has any one had this same
problem??  Has anyone got g++ to work at all (or is this a configuration
issue)????   

Thanks,  kovelan@wizards.austin.ibm.com 


Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd