From: ML0251%TNTECH.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Subject:      china's interests
Reply-To: ML0251%TNTECH.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:28:08 GMT
Comments: To: china-nt@uga.cc.uga.edu

>From:  IN%"XIAOJIAN@CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU"  3-SEP-1992 00:44:24.57
>To:    IN%"ML0251@TNTECH.BITNET"  "MINGQING LUO"
>CC:
>Subj:  RE: China's Interests

>Return-path: <CHINA-NT@UGA.BITNET>
>Received: from ukcc.uky.edu (MAILER@UKCC) by TNTECH.BITNET (PMDF #2902 ) id
><01GOBUKB8B4W8WXHMD@TNTECH.BITNET>; Thu, 3 Sep 1992 00:43:34 CDT
>Received: by UKCC (Mailer R2.08) id 7688; Thu, 03 Sep 92 01:41:57 EDT
>Date: 02 Sep 1992 22:40:00 -0700 (MST)
>From: XIAOJIAN@CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU
>Subject: RE: China's Interests
>Sender: "China-Net (The Coordination Network for IFCSS)" <CHINA-NT@UGA.BITNET>
>To: MINGQING LUO <ML0251@TNTECH.BITNET>
>Reply-to: XIAOJIAN@CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU
>Message-id: <01GOBUKTDRGE8WXHMD@TNTECH.BITNET>
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>Comments: cc: china-nt@uga.cc.uga.edu

>The definetion of China's interests: the accumulation of all Chinese'
>interests.

>The action by ST may give the already jerpodized China's MFN a fatal final
>blow. The lost of MFN will hurt millions of general Chinese' interests,
>let alone the ongoing progress to a freeer merket and eventually a
>modern democratic country.

>It is very strange that so many CSS enjoy bashing China while China is
>struggling for a modern country and making impressive progress in most
>aspects of social life, and praising the freedom and democracy in former
>Soviet and Eastern Europe while people there are suffering poverty of
>or civil war. Roma cannot be built overnight, neither freedom and
>democracy. And the approach used by ST will just get the opposite.

>A fact: in modern history, no a developing country with democracy can
>manage to develop to a developed country. There does exist trade off
>between economic development and democracy to a developing country.

>A netter mentioned Tan,Shitong. ST fled just after 6.4 and went by
>with full support of untle Sam exactly when Chinese officers openly
>ask for a better Sino-US relationship, just the opposite to Tan, Shitong.
>What a "hero"! :-)

>Yes, I share Mr.Bao's points.



>William Deng

i agree with this one of deng. even the MFN mostly benifit CCP and their
relatives, some group of bussiness men (like subcontractors of the private
firms) still can benifit from the orders from US(a little be) :). and these
ppl if they were
strong enough, they would demand more rights from the goverment. that is what
demacrate goverment come from. and even those CCPs they  can change when they
know more about the US and the western world, right?:) that is what "peaceful
change" means. :) that is what free trade for, and what Bush wants to do for
china, i believe. :)
i belive if there were enough powerful free enterpirses and private business
men in 1989, the Taianmen Squar wouldnt be ended like that.

i really respect SHEN's courage. but this is really not a good time.

last, i think all of us are elites from china. let talk a little be more
intellegen(spell):). dont through out something like "big dada" stuff. i
personally like fuck better than that one. :)
good luck fellows.
take care ourself for china, US, and the world.

mark luo
Newsgroups: talk.politics.china