From: martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan)
Subject: Re: Intellectuals & women
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:22:18 GMT

In article <1993Jan24.014023.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>Sorry, Jason. I thought you had a mind, I discovered you are a 
>moron, and since I AM IN MISSION FOR *GOD*, I flame you, up 
>to the day that you'll die. Your fault, you are clueless.

Thief. Remember when you id'd me at The World and you posted a lame about
my plan:

"To boldy fart where no man has farted before"

"I'm on a mission from god"

"Rifletette"

Someday you will come up with your own stuff. Until then I give you
permission to use my copyrighted flames. All except:

Fuckwad (tm) (C) 1992 Martin J. Hannigan All Rights Reserved
^^^^^^^
Remember when we FIRST met? This is how I described you then, and now.

>In article <1993Jan23.220140.6476@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan23.133840.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>> 
>> So let's clean that up.  "To have a child can be the most wonderful 
>> experience for some women, but not necessarily for every woman."
>
>Those women are losers.

The only reason you say that is because they are MicheleProof(tm) (C)
and you're a big fuckwad (tm) (C) who can't take it.

>>>
>> This statement must be stricken.  You have no way of proving I am cold to any
>> one but you.
>
>You are cold because you are a moron. A woman that *decide* 
>to have not children IS cold. Defending them , you ARE cold.
>>>
>> I agree.  Do you want to improve it?  Wake up.  Treat all human beings 
>> (including women) as equals.
>
>I do. Only speaking about rules and laws. I don't do it speaking 
>about sex and feelings. You know, I don't like to fuck guys.

I thought you weren't going to lie anymore?
>> 
>AND HERE, THE PROOF THAT YOU ARE CLOSE MINDED:
>
>> Guess what?  If a woman loves her career, and realises that getting pregnant
>> and having to raise a child would keep her from doing the thing she loves
>> (her career) then I believe it is perfectly fine for her to opt not to 
>> have children.  Someone else will have children, instead, I'm sure.
>> 
>IDIOT, MORON, ASSHOLE, STUPID, COLD, FALSE *INTELLECTUAL* 
>GUY! You did not understand any fuck! You are clueless, you 
>belive on Santa Claus! 
 ^^^^^^

Whats a belive?

>
>THERE ARE *MANY* WOMEN THAT DECIDE TO HAVE NOT CHILDREN 
>BECAUSE THEY ARE *AFRAID* TO *LOOSE* THEIR JOB!!!!!!!!
>
>OK?!?!? Can you understand this?!?!? And that's NOT fair!
>Jesus, you are an idiot.

So now your back to your Pope on a rope gig?

>
>Anyway, you flame yourself.
>
>> It is not for me or you to decide what is best.
>
>There are women that think that to have a children is 
>something wonderful, (probably the most wonderful thing on 
>life) but they are not proud enough to make them because this 
>system DOES NOT LIKE THE MOTHERS THAT WORK! OK?
>> 
>> No, it is not cold.  I maintain, that it is not for me to decide.  If I got
>> married to an actress, and told her, now that we're married, you are going to 
>> have to give up acting and have a baby, THAT would be cold.
>
>That's your mistake. The big one. I was going to understand 
>that you thought only about actresses. You are wrong. 
>
>============================================================
>There are many women, with a regular job, that loose that 
>job JUST BECAUSE THEY GET MARRIED! It does not happens to 
>good actresses. I told you, your world is smaller than mine.
>============================================================
>
>I can fall in love with an actress, I can love her all my 
>life, but IF she does not want to have children with me, I 
>make children with somebody else (I do not enforce her, boy). 
>But it is not a production of children, no. Probably, after a 
>while, I rather stay with the mother of my children than with 
>the sweet romantic actress. You *CAN'T* say that it is wrong.
>I have the right to have children with somebody that I love.
>> 
>> Yet you suggest that society would be a better place if women would put
>> having children ahead of the rest of their lives.
>
>That's not what I suggest, moron. There are women THAT THINK IN 
>THIS WAY, but are not able to decide. You don't know a fuck 
>about women.

I can guess by the fatness of your wife how happy you are. Tell me, is she
a TubShitter (tm) (c) or just a plain old fat Italian cow who eats
liguini all day?

[NUMEROUS LAMES OMITTED]

>> It is too bad that you have not witnessed the struggle of women, fighting
>> to have those rights.  Many already work and have families.  Why
>> don't you get your head out of your ass?
>
>Why do they have to be *enforced* to decide that?!?
>They are, trust me. 
 
Oh, I get it, not only are you back on the Pope on a rope kick, but you
are also net.pregancy.advisor (tm) (c) ?


[MULTIPLE LONG WINDED, FAR FETCHED IGNORANT LAMES DELETED]

Michele ---> F_U_C_K_W_A_D <--- (tm) (c)


Newsgroups: alt.flame