HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Illinois dignity
Date: 23 Nov 92 14:19:35 GMT
	<ASH.92Nov18082241@ulysses.mr.ams.com>
	<1992Nov20.181004.18840@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
Organization: American Math. Society

In article <1992Nov20.181004.18840@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> exby@pogo.Colorado.EDU (|J| Exby) writes:

   >>Ann Arbor is a nice place to be.  It consistently makes the best
   >>places to live lists.  And we get to cheer for a winning program, Mr.

   >you have got to be joking!  ann arbor is better than where?
   >the 3rd world and famine ridden countries maybe... maybe.
   >enjoy your winter from hell up there...

At least we get snow, and not just slush.  For those of us that like
to ski, it's great.  Have you ever been to Ann Arbor.  Have you ever
been out of your apartment?  That's what I thought.

   >>something positive once in a while?  It seems as though until Michigan
   >>loses, you are nowhere to be seen.  But when they stumble, there you

   >again boy, ya got it backwards.  michigan bashing is a "positive"
   >thing cause it puts um folk in their place.

Yeah, positively disgusting.

   >>are.  Your insistence on calling Michgan fans names is truly sad.

   >you are one to complain against name calling.  remember YOU said this:
   >(insert your hoof in mouth)
   >>What we don't deserve is assholes like you.  Why don't you crawl back
   >>into the hole you came out of?  Michigan is still undefeated in the
   >>wimpy ten.  Can Illinois say the same?  What a dickhead.

Damn, left my terminal logged on again.

   >>Here's hoping for more positive and less negative from you in the
   >>future.

   >here's hoping we don't ever here from you again.

Sorry, your Christmas wish won't come true.  Each anti-Michigan piece
of drivel you post will attract my anti-anti-Michigan drivel.  The net
loses.



-Alan Harder
 American Mathematical SOciety
 Michigan Fan
 Drinker of Anchor Steam 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: 4 YARDS AWAY FROM SYRACUSE UPSET.. MIAMI, 16-10..
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 00:31:05 GMT

In article <1992Nov22.084853.19779@henson.cc.wwu.edu> n9041679@henson.cc.wwu.edu (brian h. harper) writes:
>delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE) writes:
>
>
>
>
>> I CAN"T BELIEVE IT!!! 5 SECONDS TO GO, AND GRAVES COMPLETES A PASS TO THE
>>FOUR YARD LINE, NO TIME OUTS!!!!! MIAMI WINS 16-10... UGH!! UGH!! UGH!!!!!
>
>Miami has come SO close to losing SO many times!!! Not a very convincing #1.
>I look forward to seeing Alabama and Texas A&M to see if they're more
>deserving. Being on west coast, I haven't seen either yet. 'til then I have
>to think FSU is the best team out there. Despite the missed field goal.

Are you talking about the FSU team which lost to Miami (at home?)?
Yeah, right!

FYI, the field goal would have tied the game for FSU. Same goes for other
penn state game.

No wonder they don't ask your vote for AP poll!

Miami played the games close because

1) They were playing very good football teams (FSU, Syracuse, Penn State)
2) All these were on the road! (exception being Arizona who were playing 
great football until last week)

I bet if they play TCU and other pasties A&M and Alabama and FSU plays, they
will win big.

>-Brian Harper

Njan
From: landers@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Hazard Class Mage)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Big Ten Review (11-14-92)
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:23:15 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

In article <1992Nov17.125936.28013@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>In article <1e9rfhINNoik@bredbeddle.cs.purdue.edu> sjc@cs.purdue.edu (Steve Chapin) writes:
>>
>>Purdue has no hope against IU.  Alstott (sp?), the freshman fullback
>>who has looked super this year, is out with a broken foot/ankle (I
>>heard both, the Exponent said ankle, which means it's probably foot)
>>Hill and Conners are both out, so there are no running backs of
>>experience/merit for Purdue.  Feh.
>>
>>Maybe start Pike at QB and Hunter at RB.  That'll confuse 'em, at
>>least...
>
>I remember a few years ago when Woodson played both ways against IU, and
>Purdue pulled off a big upset.

I don't!  That was one of the 5 home games I've missed over the last
13 years.  I told my brother not to get married that day....
Also, the 1986 Bucket game featured new jerseys and Leon Burttnet,
who had already announced he was quitting, asked the boys to win
one more for him.  Sigh.

>
>So, put JEFF ZGONINA in at fullback!  He'll plow all those guys over!
>-- 
>
>Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu


Neat idea, and he sure deserves all the glory he can muster, but I'm
not sure the Zman has the speed, but I could be wrong.  Watching him
play (since my seat is 2 rows behind the defense bench) I can tell
you he's 100% intensity and looks tired late in the game.  He might
not be able to go both ways and maintain his ability to lead the 
Big 10 in tackles for loss while being double teamed on every play.

Rod Woodson, you'll remember was a cornerback at Purdue and a
kickoff returner (and a track letterman).  He has SPEED.
Corners don't get as tired as linemen.  (Or so I'm told, I 
never played the game....)

Zgonia/O'Leary '92, certainly better than Clinton/Gore or Bush/Quyale.
(Joe has missed 1 PAT and 3 FG's after being perfect through Game 8)
-- 
   <===========================><===============================>
   || Christopher Landers      ||  Stamp Out Silly Signatures! ||
   <============== landers@mentor.cc.purdue.edu ================>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Stanford 1993
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:34:50 GMT

Here is the Stanford Cardinal schedule for next year, according
to yesterday's SJ Merc:

 9/4	@ Washington
 9/11	@ San Jose State
 9/18	  Colorado
 9/25	  UCLA
10/2	  Notre Dame
10/9      ---
10/16	@ Arizona
10/23	  Arizona State
10/30	  Oregon State
11/6	@ USC
11/13	@ Oregon
11/20	  California

The out-of-conference games are SJS, Colorado and the Papal Squad.
The missing Pac-10 team is Washington State.

While on the subject of next year... Stanford will lose something like
20 starters or almost-starters to graduation.  The only non-senior
starters I can think of are QB Steve Stenstrom, CB Vaughan Bryant, LB
Coy Gibbs and WR Justin Armour, as well as PK Eric Abrams and OT Jeff
Buckey.  RB Ellery Roberts has asked the NCAA to give him one more
year of elligibility -- I think because he lost almost all of last
year to injury.


--Gidi

PS - I hear they're playing a game this weekend, too.  I hope they
do okay.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: planger@mailbox.fwrdc.rtsg.mot.com (Paul Langer)
Subject: Nebraska-->Fiesta,CU-->Orange
Organization: Oompa Loompa Preservation Society
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 15:26:30 GMT


  Gosh Marty what happened to yer boys there against Iowa State?

  Sure are quiet this week...........................

  Hello Njan, Susan, et al. and the rest of the Buff fans


===============================================================================
|Paul Langer     e-mail: planger@mcdmail1.fwrdc.rtsg.mot.com                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| 
|    CU Buff Fan in Texas...1989 Alumni-->     Email me if you are an Alumni! |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    Opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of my employer.      |
===============================================================================

      
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfrederi@encore.com (Justin Frederich)
Subject: Re: NOTRE DAME - NATIONAL CHAMPS - 1992
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 01:33:00 GMT

rszczerb@hollerith.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba) writes:

>In article <6601@npri6.npri.com> murphy@npri6.npri.com (David P. Murphy) writes:
>>
>>Florida (currently #9, probably #7 or even #6 by 22 nov 1992) will defeat
>>#3 FSU, embarrass #2 alabama, and (thanks to texas beating TAMU) finally
>>humble the #1 hurricanes in the sugar bowl.  this will not only propel
>>the gators to an undisputed first-ever national championship, but it will
>>make history by [a] being the first two-loss MNC and [b] (i think) be the
>>first ever team to beat the third, second, and first ranked teams
>>consecutively, in that order.  as a bonus, none of the three are at home.
>>an extremely impressive scenario, eh?
>>
>>         --------> REALITY CHECK <--------
>>
>>this won't even happen in my dreams :-(  the tide will crush UF like an
>>overripe melon, leaving both gators and irish on the sidelines whilst
>>alabama and miami arm-wrestle for the glory of it all.  sad but true.
>>
>>of course, if notre dame DOES play miami, by all means humiliate them.
>>

>We'll do the best we can if we get the chance, but ND is counting
>on Florida to destroy Alabama and Florida State, while not jumping
>over ND in the polls.  If you guys get the chance to play the
>mighty CANES, by all measn humiliate them.

>			- rob

Boy ! You guys are getting pathetic. Just because Miami has won 28 in a
row you don't have to gang up on 'em !!!     

Remember this : the last team to beat the Canes was Notre Dame on 10/20/90 .

And the last team to beat Miami in the Orange Bowl was Florida on 9/7/85 .

Hell both your schools decided to quit playing Miami so I think you should
practice being real quiet and let the schools with balls do the woofing !!!

Justin - in your face - Frederich

Lines: 63
From: brook@l42bb.jsc.nasa.gov) (Mike Brookover)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Bowl Matchups
Date: 16 Nov 92 22:45:23 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Engineering & Sciences Co.

In article <1992Nov16.162046.13053@Princeton.EDU> jay@puppsr12.Princeton.EDU
(Jay Shrauner) writes:

>Assume there are no upsets, then I figure we have
>
>1.  Sugar Bowl--Miami(1)/Alabama(2)
>2.  Cotton Bowl--Texas A&M (3/4)/FSU(3/4)
>3.  Rose Bowl--Washington(5)/Michigan(6)
>4.  Orange Bowl--Nebraska/
>5.  Fiesta Bowl--Notre Dame(7)/
>6.  Blockbuster Bowl--PSU(if they win!)/
>7.  Yet another bowl--

>
>Jay Shrauner
>
>
From what has been written in the Houston papers, FSU can (and will) avoid the
Cotton Bowl because they played in the game last year.  This is allegedly one
of the rules in the bowl coalition.  FSU will probably play Nebraska in the
Orange Bowl.  If A&M is such an easy win...why wouldn't FSU jump at the
chance??  And why has Miami said in no uncertain terms that they will not play
A&M in the Cotton Bowl?

later,

mgb
From: JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Why Michigan sucks..
Date: 18 Nov 92 13:48:20 GMT
Organization: GM Research Labs

In article <14713.2b09a27d@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>
vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:
>... and another thing. It looks like the reason Moeller went for
>the tie against Illinois was because he wanted to wrap up the Big-10
>Championship WITHOUT having to play Ohio State. Basically he's scared
>(even though the goofball won't admit it, even Schembechler thinks
>he's a dork).
>So his being scared of OSU cost Michigan a chance at the MNC. Too Bad.
>And it would have been so much fun...  :/
>-Garrett

Hmmmm.  I am always a bit curious about someone who posts something and
then responds to his own post.  But be that as it may, I would like
to go on record as saying. . . . . . .

HERE WE GO AGAIN.  DEJA VU.  Just like every year.  The OSU woofers
come out before the Michigan game and use words like "dick", "dork",
"they're scared of us", and so on.  It is reminiscent of the
black knight in "The Holy Grail".  OSU is good and yes, they
may even beat Michigan.  Then again, Michigan is pretty good,
especially after coming off a bad game.  I expect Michigan
to return to its high scoring offense.  Given UM's defense, it
may just be a long day for this OSU woofer.  And, oh, by the way,
what makes you think that Schembechler thinks Moleller is a dork?
From: ronnie@uts.amdahl.com (Ronnie Townsend)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Syracuse vs. Miami
Date: 17 Nov 92 23:24:53 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <1992Nov17.185344.5644@newssun.med.miami.edu> dbrown@newssun.med.miami.edu (Daniel Brown) writes:
>So many people are already talking about #1 - #2 showdowns
>on New Year's Day that I thought I would stir up some talk
>about the games that are still left.  This week's match-up
>of (1) Miami and (9) Syracuse should be a big one.
>
>Okay, so who has an opinion (am I opening up a Pandora's Box
>here or what?).  I'll say the Canes by 10, though I think the
>game will be brutal. 

Okay I'll bite on this one. Syracuse is definitely a team that can muster 
enough emotion to beat Miami if Miami fails to show up with all their shit 
together. They have the team speed to stay with Miami (somewhat) and playing
before the frenzied home crowd can only help. If they can get Miami rattled
early (FUCKING HUGE IF) they can have a chance to win going away. The key here 
will be emotion. If Miami comes in, and goes about the business of establishing
who they are (the best team in college football) then it will be a tight 
hard-fought struggle that Miami will win something like 27-14. Give Graves 
and Ismail a couple of big plays but overall, when Miami comes to play, nobody
has beaten them in a an awful long time. They have the horses, they have the 
coaching, and they have the mantle of a total juggernaut going for them. 
Syracuse has a "nothing to lose" attitude, the home faithful and two of the 
biggest big-play artists in college football in Graves and Ismail. Where I 
see a real problem for Syracuse is on defense. They have not shown themselves 
to have a quality defense this year and that could spell biiiigggg trouble 
against Miami. One simply cannot count on outscoring the Canes in a shootout
so you gotta keep the score down and they're kicker will miss one at the end 
for a change. You can't run wide on them because they're too quick to the 
ball. If you have a huge line, they'll shoot the gaps and disrupt your offense
unless they are very quick. If the Orange had a Super back to split that 
defensive charge I'd give them an even bigger chance of winning but I know 
nothing of their backs and that's a bad sign as much as I follow college 
football. Miami is certainly ripe for the taking here. Syracuse will need the
game of their lives to beat them but ... it has happened before hasn't it? 

 

-- 
Ronnie
-------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not cynical... I just don't believe in anything....


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: yvonne@well.sf.ca.us (Yvonne Lee)
Subject: Pac-10 to send SIX teams!
Summary: Oregon gets Independence bid
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 23:39:30 GMT


The Pac-10 will send six teams to bowl games this year:

1. Washington (Rose)
1. Stanford (undetermined. probably Fiesta or Blockbuster)
3. WSU (Copper)
3. USC (undetermined. Freedom or Hancock, probably Freedom)
5. Arizona (undetermined. Freedom or Hancock, probably Hancock)
6. Oregon (Independence)

Don't ask me why the Independence picked Oregon over Arizona State and UCLA,
which were tied for sixth, but I'm happy that a sixth team got in.

Go Ducks!  Go Wildcats! Go Cougars! Go Trojans! Go CARDINAL! Go Huskies!
-- 
*****************************************************************
yvonne_lee@infoworld.com   (preferred email reply address)
yvonne@well.sf.ca.us       (news account) (415) 312-0571 w  (415) 968-3132 h
*****************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Subject: Maryland Football (was: Re: Penn State Should Withdraw)
Reply-To: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 22:27:53 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.190312.56019@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> mlsa@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu  
(MICHAEL LAUREN SHERMAN) writes:

> This past weekend Maryland made perennial ACC power clemson look like
> a sand lot team,

As many teams made Maryland look this year, in fact.  What did Florida
State make Maryland look like?  The 3" high Bears, maybe?

> sure Maryland has a poor record vrs PSU,

Poor is an understatement.

> but the Shitney lions are a bunch of fairy ass cheaters

Yeah, right.  They cheated.  Heard of probation?  Try your basketball team.

> just give us a few (45) more games, we'll even the score.

Sorry, the series will end as PSU joins the Big 1X, I'm told

> Also allow me to praise Mark Duffner who may just be the best
> coach in football period.  Watch them run roughshod over the ACC
> in the years to come and bring home the national championship to
> College Park for the second time.  We did it in the fifties, we'll
> do it again.

A quite powerful woof.  Goober, I call for arbitration here.

> Also, how many PSU qb's are currently in the NFL?  Compare to the
> number of terps!

How many terp NFL quarterbacks lost on Sunday?  How many Penn State
PLAYERS are in the NFL?  Compare to number of Maryland defenders in the
NFL.  Compare to number of Maryland quarterbacks in the NFL who beat
Penn State.

--
************* "How about a little fire, Scarecrow?" **************
Orin Day, Code 664.1                    oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov
Hughes STX/NASA       GSFC Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics
*******"Think that this is NASA's opinion?   NO, NO, NO!!!" ******
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Subject: Re: Hail to Those Motherf***ers...
Reply-To: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:36:46 GMT

In article <Bxx7Mt.En6@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> landers@mentor.cc.purdue.edu  
(Hazard Class Mage) writes:

> The Assholes of the World!!

"The Cesspool of the West!" has a better ring to it, in my mind.

--
************* "How about a little fire, Scarecrow?" **************
Orin Day, Code 664.1                    oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov
Hughes STX/NASA       GSFC Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics
*******"Think that this is NASA's opinion?   NO, NO, NO!!!" ******
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: stassen@alc.com (Chris Stassen)
Subject: Can "class" be learned?  (was: "Re: Why Michigan sucks..")
Organization: The Lion's Den, San Jose
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 22:04:29 GMT

Some Buckeye "fan" (name withheld) writes, to Alan Harder:
> Just what I want is respect for someone who feels the need to tell us
[...]
> Your CRAZY!

Oh, come on!  Ohio State vs. Michigan has always been an intense rivalry,
but it ought to be approached with the class and (mutual) respect that
it deserves.  That's not to say that there isn't any old-fashioned hate
in the Border War, but it shouldn't be the only thing or even the most
visible part.  (The players and coaches have always known that, but the
"fans" and media seem to often lose sight of it.)

When the fans of a team are a class act before the game and after it --
win or lose -- they earn respect rather than abuse.  Try it some time.
Bashing another team is just *begging* for an extra serving of Humble
Pie later on.  That sort of self-image-improvement-at-someone-else's-
expense is grade-school stuff, too.

		-- Chris "curmudgeon-in-training" Stassen
--
Chris Stassen			408-943-0630			stassen@alc.com
From: chyang@westquad.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang)
Subject: Re: Pac Ten Review (11-21-92)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 92 18:33:08 EST
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Originator: chyang@westquad.engin.umich.edu


In article <1992Nov22.225053.7615@u.washington.edu>, crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck) writes:
> 
> Washington State 42, Washington 23  (The Apple Cup)

> Oregon 7, Oregon State 0	(The Civil War)
> 

> UCLA 38, USC 37
> 

> Stanford 41, California  21	(The Big Game)

> Arizona State 7, Arizona 6

	Man Oh Man!  Five conference games and four upsites!  
How can anyone top that???  So Weird!    

	I think this might be enough to scare anyone who is considering
to join the PAC-10.  

- Chung Yang

> 
>                     		   Conference     All Games
>                                 W  L T Pts OP    W  L T Pts OP
> Washington                      6  2 0 219 117   9  2 0 306 148
> Stanford                        6  2 0 184 130   9  3 0 296 193
> Wash. St.                       5  3 0 191 193   8  3 0 306 253
> USC                             5  3 0 183 153   6  3 1 234 194
> Arizona                         4  3 1 131  87   6  4 1 217  98
> Arizona St                      4  4 0 153 135   6  5 0 235 185
> Oregon                          4  4 0 134 140   6  5 0 230 183
> UCLA                            3  5 0 112 197   6  5 0 201 228
> California                      2  6 0 197 204   4  7 0 284 284
> Oregon St.                      0  7 1  88 236   1  9 1 163 363
> 
> Next week's game:  Notre Dame at USC
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado)
Subject: Re: Possible #1 vs. #2 matchup in major bowl games.
Organization: Florida State University Computing Center
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 16:35:16 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.152624.10084@ods.com> scott@ods.com (Scott Harper) writes:
>Alireza Vali (reza@magellan.ae.utexas.edu) wrote:
>: Scenario 4: MNC decided in the Fiesta Bowl.
>: 
>: #1 Miami (11-0) vs. #2 Florida State (10-1)
>: 
>: This one will be possible if, again, Alabama loses, and Michigan is
>: tripped up by Ohio State.  A loss or poor showing by A&M will let FSU
>: jump over them to #2.  I would **LOVE** to see this rematch, and I'm
>: sure it will be an incredible game.
>
>Well, this all of a sudden is a very real possibility... 2 of the 3 'ifs'
>cited above have happened...  (UM tied by Illinois, FSU jumps A&M)
>
>My question is: 
>
>Why in the world would Miami play FSU again?  They already beat them.
>Now I know this will bring out cries of "chicken" from the FSU crowd,
>but really, what does Miami have to gain from a rematch?  How could
>they be accused of ducking FSU?  They already played them, AND WON...

If FSU and Miami are ranked 2 and 1 respectively, Miami has no choice but to
play FSU again in the Fiesta. My guess is that they wouldn't mind this game
inthe least. Ask any FSU or Miami player and they will tell you that the most
exciting game for them is the annual FSU-Miami matchup. Why? It's always a 
fucking good game, that's why. Miami does not fear FSU (why would they?) and
so I don't think they would even try to back out of it. Both FSU and Miami
have evolved over the season, with both team's realatively inexperienced
offensive lines coming together. FSU's kicking game is even up a notch (from
attrocious to just merely bad) so they might actually have a chance against
Miami in a close one (but don't hold your breath). 

Miami has owned FSU for the past few years, and I think they would love to 
have a chance to beat FSU twice in one year...not to mention the fact that
they would be given a shot a breaking Bowden's 10 win bowl streak. FSU
would love to have another shot at Miami, especially now that the offense
has found its style (no-huddle, shotgun). Personally, I think this matchup
would be the best bowl matchup in years...and as is usual with FSU-Miami
games, it would be a nail-biter, awesome kind of a game.

>
>So, if they didn't play a rematch, what would happen? (Assuming Alabama
>loses)
>
Like I said, if FSU and Miami are ranked 1 and 2, they have no choice but
to play each other in the Fiesta. Gotta love that bowl coalition.

>ps. - I am DEFINITELY not a Miami fan...
>-- 
>Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
>scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
>(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081

Kevin
From: JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Can ANYBODY beat Washington????
Date: 23 Nov 92 16:03:25 GMT
Organization: GM Research Labs

What?  Don't you know the answer?

Can they even win the Rose Bowl?