HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jarp@sabrina.inesc.pt (Jorge Alexandre Ribeiro Pinto)
Subject: HELP !!!
Organization: INESC (Inst. Eng. Sistemas e Computadores) -LISBOA -PORTUGAL
Distribution: comp.unix.ultrix
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 16:49:03 GMT



 
 Hi! I have a very strange problem.


 I've a DEC 5000/200 and a CDROM (RRD42) and it's running ultrix 4.1 .
 I want to install ultrix and UWS V4.2A SUPP/UNSUPP (RISC) from my
RRD42.

 At the monitor prompt ">>" i give the next command:

 >>boot 5/rz4/vmunix 

 and then the cd light flashes for a while and then I get the
following:

 binit fld

 and the prompt of the monitor reapears.

 Isn't it strange???

 I've followed carefully all the instructions in the manuals regarding
the subject.

 Any information would be welcome.

 Thanks.

 Jorge.

 PS - You can e-mail to me too.

--
*************************************************************** 
 Jorge Alexandre Ribeiro Pinto @ INESC	                           
 Address : R. Alves Redol 9, 1000 Lisboa, PORTUGAL.			  
 e_mail : jarp@sabrina.inesc.pt                  
                                                    
 Phone Number : 351 1 31002245    sala: 602                               
***************************************************************
From: btaylor@mcl.bdm.com (Brent Taylor)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: FAL agent problem in DECnet/OSI
Date: 26 Jan 1993 20:18:13 GMT
Organization: BDM International, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: apollo.mcl.bdm.com

I have a DECsystem5240 running Ultrix 4.3 and DECnet/OSI 5.1. I have a client
application out there tring to connect to the File Access Listner (FAL) agent
on the Ultrix machine. FAL grants the initial request and even opens the
file that is being requested, but the client is saying that there is an
access violation problem. All permissions on the file are wide open, and
the client is using the root account access information to access FAL.
In the syslog I get

Jan 25 10:11:20 localhost: 1163 fal: OPEN access from wmata:.jupg::uic=[157240,10063]JUPITER, user=root, directory=/, filename=/usr/lib/X11/fonts/decwin/100dpi/fonts.dir

but nothing further. The FAL application is running on behave of the root
account as well. Any ideas would be appreciated.

Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: farrow@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (J. Scott Farrow)
Subject: Re: ULTRIX .or. OSF?
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 21:07:15 GMT

mats@rigel.efd.lth.se (mats akerberg) writes:


>Hi!

>I have heard a rumour that DEC is going to sack
>OSF for MIPS.....
>That means no shared librarys among other things.

>Why oh why DEC, how can you treat us, the faitful users like
>this?

Unless I'm mistaken. That rumor is about 6 months old and was refuted by
DEC some time ago. Last I heard, DEC is going full steam ahead with OSF/1
for MIPS.

Scott


>____
>  Mats Akerberg, System Manager (mats@rigel.efd.lth.se)
>  Lund Institute of Technology ,School of Electrical Engineering and  
>  Computer Sciences. Snail: Box 118  S-221 00 Lund Sweden
>  Phone: + 46 46-109847 FAX: + 46 46-104013 
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Scott Farrow-Student SysAdmin/Programmer, University of Colorado at Boulder
Computing & Network Services, Boulder, Colorado, USA, phone: (303) 492-4428
Internet: farrow@spot.colorado.edu, farrow@cs.colorado.edu
From: gshapiro@alpha.WPI.EDU (Gregory Neil Shapiro)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: LinkWorks & reclock
Date: 26 Jan 93 19:14:45 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609-2280
NNTP-Posting-Host: alpha.wpi.edu
In-reply-to: beck@irs132.inf.tu-dresden.de's message of 26 Jan 1993 18:28:23 GMT


Those messages are produced by lockd.  I wish we could get rid of them
but DEC claims that they don't hinder the performance of lockd and
therefore are not a priority problem.  They say the chances of them
being fixed are slim (they are left over debug statements).

--
 ____________________________________________________________________________
 Gregory Neil Shapiro                                    gshapiro@wpi.wpi.edu
            Academic Systems Integrator, College Computer Center
                       Worcester Polytechnic Institute
 ____________________________________________________________________________
From: pape@plato.chemietechnik.uni-dortmund.de (David Pape)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: .login/.logout not read
Date: 22 Jan 1993 15:15:38 GMT
Organization: Universitaet Dortmund FB Chemietechnik 
NNTP-Posting-Host: plato.chemietechnik.uni-dortmund.de
Keywords: .login,.logout

Hi,

	I have a problem with logging in/out on our DEC5000/200
	running Ultrix4.3a.

	It seems that -login and .logout are not being read when I login/logout.

	I've tried dxterm -ls AND xterm -ls, but neither works.

	Any ideas??

	Also, I use dxsession.

--
David Pape                               | "Justice is inci- | 	       ///
pape@plato.Chemietechnik.Uni-Dortmund.DE |  dental to law    |  \\\ UNI_DO
Dortmund, Germany                        |  and order"       |   \\\///
tel: 49 231 7552682                      | - J. Edgar Hoover |    \\//
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: haider@gwdgv1.gwdg.de
Subject: f77 -cord problem
Reply-To: haider@gwdgv1.gwdg.de
Organization: GWDG Goettingen, F.R.Germany
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 09:38:28 GMT

I tried to link a fortran program with -cord -feedback options,
but the compiler always crashed in the cord section.
my machine is a DECstation 3100, ultrix 4.2, DEC-Fortran 3.1
Does anybody know this problem  and/or a solution?
following a small test program plus the commands I used

c  this is the program to test the f77 -cord option
c
c  the following sequence of commands was used:
c
c  f77 -o testcord testcord.f
c  pixie testcord
c  testcord.pixie
c  prof -feedback testcord.feed testcord
c  f77 -o testcord.opt -feedback testcord.feed -cord testcord.f
c
c  yields
c  Fatal error in: /usr/lib/cmplrs/cc/cord Segmentation faut
c  fort: Severe: Failed while trying to linkc
c
        real x(100000)
        do i=1,100000
          x(i)=6.283*real(i)/100000.
        end do
        read(*,*) i
        write(*,*) x(i)
        stop
        end


thanks

  Ferdinand Haider (haider@umpds2.gwdg.de)

Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: john@iastate.edu (John Hascall)
Subject: Re: Recommendations for high disk throughput
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 22:24:51 GMT

joe@grc.genroco.com (Joe Nordman) writes:
}john@iastate.edu (John Hascall) writes:
}>alan@nabeth.enet.dec.com (Alan Rollow) writes:
}>}thomson@zarda.macc.wisc.edu (Don Thomson) writes:

}>}An IPI subsystem will probably help, but it seems a bit overkill...
}>Perhaps not.  A fairly recent Usenix Paper, "Why SCSI is better than IPI
}>for NFS" (or something like that), held that IPI was really only a win
}>for large sequential I/Os, for the NFS I/O mix (generally 8KB and all
}>over the disk [sound familiar?]) SCSI was a win.

}Actually on Ultrix systems this is not true.  IPI will still win.  The
}paper uses a couple of arguments which are either outdated, or don't
}apply to these systems:

   [...reasons elided...]

}Joe Nordman, V.P. of R&D 				joe@genroco.com 
}GENROCO, Inc.           

   Not that I doubt any of what was said, but it only seems fair
   that people know that GENROCO makes IPI controllers for DECs...

John
-- 
John Hascall                   ``An ill-chosen word is the fool's messenger.''
Systems Software Engineer
Project Vincent
Iowa State University Computation Center  +  Ames, IA  50011  +  515/294-9551
From: mort@spool.mu.edu.uucp (Martin Wiedmeyer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: POP Server for ULTRIX?
Date: 29 Jan 1993 00:05:09 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Department MSCS
NNTP-Posting-Host: studsys.mscs.mu.edu
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

frank@croton.nyo.dec.com (Frank Wortner) writes:
: 
: mort has written:
: |>
: |>But.... ULTRIX has no POP server :-(
: |>
: 
: 4.2: 	/etc/popd
: 4.3:	/usr/lib/mh/popd
: 
: Does this help?
: 
: 					Frank

	Yes, it _should_ :-)

	Thanks, Frank! I'll grab the man pages from gatekeeper too...

--
Marty Wiedmeyer				mort@studsys.mscs.mu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: cliff@eggneb.astro.ucla.edu (cliff UCLA Astronomy)
Subject: Writing to an Exabyte 8500
Keywords: Exabyte 8500
Reply-To: cliff@eggneb.astro.ucla.edu (cliff UCLA Astronomy)
Organization: UCLA Department of Astronomy
Date: 22 Jan 93 16:28:23 PST



 I just got an Exabyte 8500 and I want to know if I can write to it at both
 high(5.0gig) and low(2.3gig) density.  I made the device files and like my
 other tape units I get both  rmt0l's and rmt0h's but a preliminary test using
 nrmt0l seems to indicate that the tape is writing at high density.  Any
 suggestions????

 cliff
From: olson@anchor.esd.sgi.com (Dave Olson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Archive Python cam_data.c description wanted
Date: 27 Jan 93 21:10:46 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.  Mountain View, CA

In <1993Jan27.005404.7669@osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu> terry@osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu (Terry Klarich) writes:


| I noticed in the cam_data.c file in the sys/data directory has a
| description for an archive viper.  I was wondering if anyone has done
| the work of adding one for an archive python.  We have one of these
| drives

I believe that the tlz06 is an archive python, so you might start from
that.
--
Let no one tell me that silence gives consent,  |   Dave Olson
because whoever is silent dissents.             |   Silicon Graphics, Inc.
    Maria Isabel Barreno                        |   olson@sgi.com
From: mjr@tis.com (Marcus J Ranum)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Security software for ultrix
Date: 29 Jan 1993 03:59:28 GMT
Organization: Trusted Information Systems, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.tis.com

uqitu09@lshtm.ac.uk (Peter Mantock) writes:
>Could someone please advise me on some heavyweight security software for our
>ultrix 4.2 system especailly for protecting data.

	That's a mighty vague request. "Heavyweight" covers a lot of
ground. 
	Protecting data is also vague. If you want to protect individual
bits of data, I suggest you examine various encryption techniques. If
you want to set up system wide access control with mandatory labeling
of objects and so forth (a la orange book) then you're going to be
looking at interesting issues with respect to export control and
so forth.
	What are your requirements?

mjr.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: sharpe@nmesis.enet.dec.com (Richard Sharpe)
Subject: Re: ULTRIX .or. OSF?
Reply-To: sharpe@nmesis.enet.dec.com (Richard Sharpe)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 23:44:25 GMT


--
farrow@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (J. Scott Farrow) writes:

>mats@rigel.efd.lth.se (mats akerberg) writes:
>
>
>>Hi!
>
>>I have heard a rumour that DEC is going to sack
>>OSF for MIPS.....
>>That means no shared librarys among other things.
>
>>Why oh why DEC, how can you treat us, the faitful users like
>>this?
>
>Unless I'm mistaken. That rumor is about 6 months old and was refuted by
>DEC some time ago. Last I heard, DEC is going full steam ahead with OSF/1
>for MIPS.
>
>Scott

This is the plan. The MIPS version release will follow the Alpha release by 
some number of months. I cannot give further details. You may be able to get
further information in a PID presentation. The Alpha release will be in the 
March/April 93 timeframe.

You could always check with you nearest sales professional for the (hopefully)
irresistable Alpha AXP upgrade prices for your DECstation/system :-)

Regards
--------
Richard Sharpe,  sharpe@nmesis.enet.dec.com,  Ph: 61-8-235-7237,  FAX: ...-7299
Digital Equipment Corporation, 139 Frome St, Adelaide 5001, South Australia, OZ
* I have children to keep me poor in a monetary sense, but rich in so many    *
* other ways!                                                                 *
All opinions are those of the author, not of Digital Equipment!
From: jeroen@let.ruu.nl (Jeroen Scheerder)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: LAT trouble: PROTOCOL ERROR
Date: 27 Jan 93 11:24:56 GMT
Reply-To: Jeroen.Scheerder@let.ruu.nl
Organization: Faculty of Arts, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
X-Preferred-Newsreader: NewsWatcher (of course)

Greetings,

Recently at our site we're having trouble connecting from terminal
servers, PC's, VAXen, etc. etc. using LAT to Ultrix machines.
Connections succeed for a while, then suddenly terminate with an error
message stating something about an error 207, which amounts to a
'protocol error'. From the same terminal server/pc/vax to another
LAT-supporting machine this doesn't happen.
Does anyone have a clue as to what's happening?

We're running Ultrix 4.2 (already WITH the latest LAT patches, which
didn't help).

Thanks in advance, Jeroen.
From: gel@sys.uea.ac.uk (Gareth Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Load average way too high
Date: 25 Jan 93 12:54:59 GMT
Organization: UEA School of Information Systems, Norwich, UK.

john@phobos.sscl.uwo.ca (John Tucker) writes:

>I hope some one has some clues on this.

>Every once in a while with no real pattern, the load average (as reported
>by w -u) climbs and gets up around 3.50.

>There are at most 3 or 4 users logged in at any time, so this seems way too
>high. A 'ps -aux' reveals that 'inetd' and 'syslog' are the major 
>consumers of %CPU and %MEMORY.

I wonder if you have a frequently recurring error (perhaps in inetd)
which syslog is logging.  They should neither require significant CPU
or memory - my 'ps -aux' entries are (after 2 weeks uptime).

daemon      90  0.0  0.6  164  144 ?  I      0:01 /etc/syslog
root       149  0.0  0.6  184  148 ?  I      0:23 /etc/inetd

Try looking in /var/spool/mqueue/syslog for any error messages or
run 'uerf -R | more' to see if any ultrix error messages are logged.

Gareth Lee.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: karrer@bernina.ethz.ch (Andreas Karrer)
Subject: Re: Load average way too high
Organization: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, CH
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:06:13 GMT

john@phobos.sscl.uwo.ca (John Tucker) writes:

>We are running Ultrix 4.2A on a miscellaneous bunch of Decstations 
>(3xxx's 5xxx's) and are running into a strange problem.

>Every once in a while with no real pattern, the load average (as reported
>by w -u) climbs and gets up around 3.50.

I have seen this on 4.2a too: apparently the load av counter gets mixed
up by an integral number every now and then; your "3.50" should
probably be "0.50".  It usu fixes itself within a day or a half, or by
a reboot :-(

This - apart from annoy - is only a problem for daemons that use
the load ave for some decision: sendmail, nntpd etc.

Processes in resource-wait state (check with ps aux|grep D) also contribute
to the load average; any hung tape drives around?

 - Andi

+-----------
  Andi Karrer, Communication Systems, ETH Zuerich, Switzerland
  karrer@bernina.ethz.ch    - Objects in mirror are closer than they appear
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: toma@db.TC.Cornell.EDU (Rory Toma)
Subject: Need help in setting up Vax 11/750
Organization: Not bloody likely around here!
Distribution: comp.sys.unix.ultrix
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 00:16:03 GMT

I figured this was a good place to post this.

I have a Vax 11/750 with RA60's. Unfortunately, I have no Tape drive,
nor do I have any UDA50's. I need a UDA50, but I also need some way
to get Unix onto my RA60's. Suggestions?

Thanks
--
toma@tc.cornell.edu	rory@foopub.tucson.az.us
You want me to upgrade to System what?

Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: pmurphy@nrao.edu (Pat Murphy)
Subject: PPP on Ultrix 4.0/Decst 3100
Organization: National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:04:38 GMT

Does anyone have experiences with this?  Does it work?  Any problems
getting it set up?  Comments/horror stories/success stories welcomed. 

TIA,
				- Pat
--
==========================================================================
| Patrick P. Murphy, Ph.D.                Scientific Programming Analyst |
| National Radio Astronomy Observatory    Net:       pmurphy@nrao.edu    |
| 520 Edgemont Road                       Phone:     (804) 296-0372      |
| Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475          VoiceMail: (804) 980-5889      |
|      "I don't believe in the no-win scenario"  --- James T. Kirk       |
==========================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: dlopata@stat.ufl.edu (David Lopata)
Subject: Mtools on a Personal DECstation?
Keywords: mtools floppy personal decstation
Reply-To: dlopata@stat.ufl.edu (David Lopata)
Organization: U of Florida. Statistics Dept.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 18:04:09 GMT

...

	Hello.  We've recently installed two Personal DECstation 25s on our
network.  Our biggest problem was that doconfig didn't work, and they didn't
give us enough information to gen a kernel that recognized the keyboard or
mouse (I guess DEC considers these memory wasting features).

	Anyway, the systems are up, but nothing wants to recognize the
floppy drive.  The devs are gens, but my guess is the kernel doesn't have
the support features in it.

	Does anyone know what I need to put in there? 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
David C. Lopata                                          dlopata@stat.ufl.edu
System Manager, Dept. of Statistics                           234A Floyd Hall
"Impeach Clinton!"                                     (904)392-1941 Ext. 233
From: mort@spool.mu.edu.uucp (Martin Wiedmeyer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: POP Server for ULTRIX?
Date: 26 Jan 93 23:57:48 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Department MSCS
NNTP-Posting-Host: studsys.mscs.mu.edu
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

Hi,

We are using WNQVTnet at our site and would like to use the POP client.

But.... ULTRIX has no POP server :-(

Would someone be so kind as to point me in the right direction?

Email please!!!

Thanks.
--
Marty Wiedmeyer				mort@studsys.mscs.mu.edu
From: jbotz@mtholyoke.edu (Jurgen Botz)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: ULTRIX .or. OSF?
Date: 27 Jan 1993 19:15:32 -0500
Organization: Mount Holyoke College
NNTP-Posting-Host: slab.mtholyoke.edu

In article <MATS.93Jan27082851@styx.efd.lth.se> mats@efd.lth.se (Mats Akerberg) writes:
>In article <1993Jan26.210715.14724@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> farrow@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (J. Scott Farrow) writes:
>>   Unless I'm mistaken. That rumor is about 6 months old and was refuted by
>>   DEC some time ago. Last I heard, DEC is going full steam ahead with OSF/1
>>   for MIPS.
>
>That was what I thought as well, but apparently the new management 
>at DEC is reconsider that decision....

I doubt it... but if you're right I predict the inevitable demise of
DEC within two years.  When DEC announced last spring that they wouldn't
be porting OSF/1 to existing MIPS machines the users screamed bloody 
murder and DEC management said "oops" and quickly announced that they
had changed their mind.  To change their mind /again/ and completely
ignore the wishes of their users would prove to most of us that DEC
simply can't be relied upon and we won't want to buy their computers
anymore.

Seriously... the Alpha may be a spiffy processor, but raw speed alone is
not on the top of most of our lists of considerations when we decided on
systems that our organizations will be relying upon for their day-to-day
operations, and that's where DEC's bread and butter is and will be in
the future.  If I can't rely on DEC to support the investment I've made
in them, I'm going to turn to Sun and/or HP which have a better track-
record -- and guess what -- are profitable as companies because of it.

For DEC 1993 is the Year of the Last Chance.  If they blow it they'll
be gone before Alphas outnumber Vaxen.
-- 
Jurgen Botz, jbotz@mtholyoke.edu
Northampton, MA, USA
From: d8arnch@dtek.chalmers.se (Christopher Arnold)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: DEC FAXserver?  Anybody used this?
Date: 25 Jan 93 22:37:20 GMT
Organization: Chalmers University Of Technology

In article <1k15i0INNd2c@sol.tis.com> avolio@tis.com writes:
>In article <C1EzH4.FF4@news.chalmers.se>, d8arnch@dtek.chalmers.se (Christopher Arnold) writes:
>|> I have a quick look at the software, it seems to be very orientated around
>|> everex modems. I tried to use a ZyXEL U1496E with no success. Is there anyone
>|> out there who have succeded with this? (or any other non everex modem?)
>
>I believe the documentation says it supports only Everex modems.  At
>this point.
Yes i guess it does, but still will (could) it work.
Perhaps with a hack? They are both class2 Fax-modems arn't they?

	/chris
--
Christopher Arnold (SM6PVL)                    ! chris@geo.chalmers.se
Chalmers Univerity of Technology               ! d8arnch@dtek.chalmers.se
Department of Geology                          ! 
S-412 96 Gothenburg, SWEDEN                    ! Day time: (+46) 8 6279080
From: ccbjs@levels.unisa.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Three swap partitions on Ultrix 4.3?
Date: 21 Jan 93 21:43:25 +1030
Organization: University of South Australia

Is it possible to configure an Ultrix 4.3 system to use 3 disks
for swap?   The documentation for swapon  sort of suggests it is.
We have found from experience that swapon  doesn't work unless
the kernal was configured to use it, eg two partitions:
  config  vmunix root on rz0a swap on rz0b and rz1b dumps on rz1b

/etc/doconfig didn't complain about the following:
  config  vmunix root on rz0a swap on rz0b and rz1b and rz2b dumps on rz1b

When we added the 3rd partition to fstab it would boot OK, but strange
things happened:
  pstat -s returned
  -8k    (Thats minus!) for swap configured.

  and top failed to execute.

Thanks for your help, Bevin Steer, Unix Systems Manager,
------------                                                      ------------
ccbjs@levels.unisa.edu.au
Phone:  +61-8-302-3271                                           Fax: 302 3385
Computer Centre, University of South Australia, The Levels, SA 5095, Australia
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: wilsons@vxdesy.desy.de
Subject: X-based exabyte contoller.
Organization: (DESY, Hamburg, Germany)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 22:37:25 GMT

Does anybody know of an X-based package that enables easy operation
of an exabyte drive connected to a DECStation? with functions
such as dd, mt etc accesable?

Thanks in advance.

Simon Wilson,

Bristol University.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
From: putsch@uicc.com (Jeff Putsch)
Subject: Re: NFS write error 13 ?????
Organization: Unitrode Integrated Circuits Corp., Merrimack, NH, USA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 13:40:52 GMT

In article <SHEPHERD.93Jan13163317@brew.cme.nist.gov> shepherd@cme.nist.gov
(Kent Shepherd - pdesinc) writes:

>}I am mounting a filesystem from a DECstation 3100 running under
>}Ultrix 4.2A onto an IBM RS6000 running under AIX 3.2.  I get error 
>}messages from the client (the IBM) stating:
>}
>}	NFS write error 13 on host xxxx fh 22150000 25780000 4dedaa05 
>}              1500000 4fbd3b54 0 0 0
>}

My question is...

How does one find the file refered to by the fh in the above error message?

Thanks,

Jeff.


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Putsch                          |  Internet: putsch@uicc.com
Unitrode Integrated Circuits Corp.   |  
Merrimack, NH  USA                   |  Voice   : (US) 603-429-8626 (daytime)