From: dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren)
Subject: Re: More answers on Holocaust (G. Martin)
Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 20:25:34 GMT

Please note "G. Martin's" logic: when the "Leuchter report" is exposed
as a stupid hoax, and the team of Polish experts debunks it and
declares it means nothing (Appendix I), what does "Martin" write?

----------------------------------------------------------
In article <RaFLiB1w164w@b-cpu.UUCP# gmartin@b-cpu.UUCP (George Martin) writes:

???????????????????????????????????????????????
Poland needs money to rebuild its country.  The Zionists have control
of much of the international banks.  You can fill in the blanks.
???????????????????????????????????????????????
----------------------------------------------------------

Atleast, "Martin" could try to prove the above fact (Zionists control
of international banking) and explain why Israel has to run and beg
for loan guarantees if that is the case? But don't expect him to
prove *anything* - just continue with the old Nazi propaganda 
of how the Jews control everything, while replacing "Jews" with
"Zionists" (of course sometimes they forget). 

"Martin" has a great sense of humor, we all know. He once wrote
that the Nazis maybe dropped bannana peels into the gas chambers
so all the Jews would slip and kill themselves. What a great guy.

Maybe because he has such a great sense of humor, "Martin" includes
in his post segments from Pressac's "Technique and Operation
of the gas chambers in Auscuwitz-Birenau". The book is a detailed
study of the Auschwitz extermination camp, and exposes the
revisionist's hoaxes.  


*********************************************************************
Appendix I: opinions of Polish experts on the "Leuchter report"
            and the possibility of cyanic traces found in the
            homicidal gas chamber number II in Auschwitz.
            I am quoting directly from the B-CPU post regarding this
            matter. I quote only the relevant parts.
[......]

  Stronger acids, such as sulfuric acids, easily dissolve the cyanides.
The compounds of cyanide ions with heavy metals are longer lasting.
This includes the already mentioned Prussian blue, although this will
also slowly dissolve in an acidic environment.

  Therefore, one can hardly assume that traces of cyanic compounds
                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
could still be detected in construction materials (plaster, brick)
after 45 years, after being subjected to the weather and the elements
(rain, acid oxides, especially sulfuric and nitrogen oxides).  More
reliable would be the analysis of wall plaster [samples] from closed
rooms which were not subject to weather and the elements (including
acid rain).
--------------------------------------------------------------------

[.......]

Specialist for Technical Testing
Engineer Jerzy Labedz

Director of Toxicology
Dr. Wojciech Gubala

Senior Assistant
Beata Trzcinska, M.S.

[.......]

     In a letter dated June 7, 1991, Dr. Markiewicz responded:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

[.......]

hydrogen cyanide."  In connection with the question posed in that
letter I qualified the chances of detecting hydrogen cyanide in such
samples as nearly none.  As a chemist engaged in forensic chemical
           ^^^^^^^^^^^ 
toxicology for 45 years, I am familiar with the properties of this
volatile substance.  Hence my reply. 
----------------------------------------------------------------------

*********************************************************************



-Danny Keren.