From: patrick@rio-grande.is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: to Howard Black a.k.a Mr. Chemistry (Re: WHY?)
Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:23:45 GMT

In article <5Nk3VB1w163w@peewee> peewee@infoserv.com (Philip Stromer) writes:

	   >You're one of the only heterosexual people I know that's 
	   >enough of a jerk to post the crap we've seen from you.  

   Don't forget about ME.        

Believe me, a lot of us would like to.

	   >But you seem to think that when we insult you, we are 
	   >insulting all heterosexuals.  

   You are, because homosexuality is ... eeewwww!!!        

Then don't practice it.  Why do you have such inordinate difficulty with
figuring out *that* little smidgen of common sense?

	   >Yep, it's true.  Just like djk, the Zekester is basically 
	   >unable to read.  

   Maybe so, but he sure can WRITE !!!        

Yeah, about as well as he reads.

	   >Here on alt.politics.homosexuality people have repeatedly said
	   >that most gay people did _not_ choose to be gay, and 
	   >can _not_ choose _not_ to be gay.  

   What, were they FORCED to be gay?  Did someone hold a gun to their        
   head and say, "pretend we're in Deliverance, and SQUEAL?!"

Ever heard of genetics?  Could it be that maybe they were BORN that way?
Look at it this way -- did you choose to be straight?  I know I didn't -- it
happens to be the way I am.

	   >All psychological studies agree that sexual orientation is in 
	   >most cases not a voluntary choice 

   Psychology is a bunch of baloney.  It's just an excuse for the mentally 
   FEEBLE to pretend they're acceptable, when they're really LEMONS.  The
   epitome of political correctness.  Be a basket case, and instead of
   being lampooned, you're put on a pedestal as "mentally challenged".

   Bllluuuurrrggghhh!!!  Excuse me, I need to wipe up the vomit.
 
Psychology is "baloney"?  I see -- it reaches conclusions that don't agree
with your pre-ordained ones, therefore it *must* be wrong.  Ayup.

	   >Could you, Zekester, choose not to be straight?

   Why should he, when there's so many good looking BABES out there?!

Maybe you should try an honest effort (for once in your life -- who knows,
you might actually like it!) at answering that question for yourself.

	   >When did you choose to be straight?  

   Uh, after I saw Jamie Lee Curtis' huge HOOTERS in the movie "Perfect"?   

Sure, Phil.  If anyone would be aware of the occurrence of something that
didn't happen in the first place, you'd be the guy.

	   >You simply do not know what the fuck you are talking about.

   Gee, how lovely...you know how to use profanity.  Turn me on!

Why?  Posting drivel like this latest masterpiece of yours appears to be one
of the few turn-ons you've got.

	   >And whether or _not_ homosexuality is a choice for any 
	   >particular person,

   ...is really irrelevant, because it's so...so...so EEEWWWW!!!

We've only heard this from you enough times to overflow the average
calculator -- why not be different for once and tell us something we DON'T
know? 

	   >why _should_ they choose not to be homosexual?  

   Uh, because it greatly reduces their chance of contracting AIDS?        

Gee, I guess that's why HIV is mostly found in straights?  (It's only a
predominantly gay-related affliction in this country.)

	   >What are the _exact reasons_ homosexuality is inferior to 
	   >heterosexuality as a sexual orientation?

   o AIDS

Which, of course, has been documented to be a lie -- which is why you keep
repeating it, no doubt.

   o Popularity

That and 85c will get you downtown on Metro, too -- i.e., what's your point?

   o Good-looking chicks

See above.

   o Reproduction

That's funny -- it's been around as long as recorded history, and we're only
at the point of populating the race right out of existence...but then, with
your logic, that's good enough.

   o Coolness

If you were representative of all heteros, that in itself would be reason
for a lot of folks to at least wish they weren't.

   o Feel free to add anything else that comes to mind

You did, obviously -- of course, you don't have much of a mind for anything
to come to, but I digress.

	   >People like you are why the Republican Party lost so badly 
	   >this year, and why it will continue to lose badly unless it 
	   >disavows the PRO HETEROs.

   Screw the Republicans.  I hate anyone that hates free speech.  That's
   almost as bad as being (eeewwww!!!) homosexual.  The Libertarians are
   the only party I'd trust with my precious vote.

You're about as Libertarian as Stalin.  I hate to tell you, but the LP folks
would reject every one of your half-baked assertions.  (They ran a few gay
candidates locally in this year's elections -- what would you have done
then?  Besides foam at the mouth, that is.)

	   >we pick your arguments to pieces 

   Only because you can't pick his doo-doo to pieces.  Har har har !!!

Only because you never had an argument to begin with -- just the usual
ranting, raving, and plain old bigotry against anyone who commits the mortal
sin of not being the same as you.  Oh, well...

--PLH, straight.  So what?  There are things in life much more important
than worrying about someone's sexual preference.  (Maybe that's why I
haven't been fired from Sun, who knows?  :-)

--
Patrick L. Humphrey  (patrick@is.rice.edu)  Rice Networking & Computing Systems
     +1 713 528-3626 at Rice. 776-1541 at home. 667-6554 at Palace Lanes. 
                                 Power corrupts.
                          Absolute power is kind of neat.
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush