HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: o.CRepin-leblond@ic.ac.UK (Olivier M.J. Crepin-Leblond, Olivier M.J. 
      Crepin-Leblond)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
Subject: Re: Who is Crepin-Leblond
Date: 6 Nov 92 23:36:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: cscmgb.9211062336.AA01145
Organization: Imperial College, London, UK.

In a recent post, Nabeel "Bulbul" Ghuzlaan enquires about the 
authenticity of my post regarding his double (triple ?) identity:

>
>   [Some others even went lower!]
>   
>   The sender of that post is daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu. Why
>would IC use OSU to send its outgoing news mail? Anyway, I hope
>the poster of this article is not the one I am thinking of
>right now. In that case, how would we know that he did not
>forge the paths of the so-called "Sheikh Jaber Subah" to point
>wherever he/she/it wishes?

and in another post (ho ho do I sense some panicking from Nabeel ?)


>   So that is why someone forged the article in his name. But
>the forger (not an expert) did not know that there is no direct
>connection between Imperial College and Ohio State University,
>also forgot to override the Sender: field. Also the forger
>used a non-existing account as the source of the article.
>
>   The forger is from Ohio State University.
>
>**
>

Sorry to deceive you, but you got that theory wrong as well, Bulbul.
I am using cis.ohio-state.edu to post messages simply because our
machine here has not got posting possibilities. You see, we get our
newsfeed from icdoc, but we can't post. So I am making use of
well known mail-to-usenet gateways to post. Obviously something
which you were not aware of. You can all try it yourselves. To
post this article, I am sending to:

soc.culture.arabic@cis.ohio-state.edu

You can send to virtually all newsgroups. This is an official email to
news gateway, and there is NO forgery involved whatsoever.
As to the non-existence of my account, that's news to me.
Imperial College has a vast number of machines on-site, and a system
called email aliasing is used, where you have one email name for the
whole college. 
I'm sending Mr. Bulbul a separate message (email) to confirm to him
that I do exist. I do hope that this will calm him down a bit. People
who turn places into battlefields occasionaly get flamed themselves.
Then, everything goes back to quietness.

O.



-- 
Olivier M.J. Crepin-Leblond, Digital Comms. Section, Elec. Eng. Department
 Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2BT, UK
       Internet/Bitnet: <foobar@ic.ac.uk> - Janet: <foobar@uk.ac.ic>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
From: ktfizazi@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Kamal Tayeb Fizazi)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
Subject: Re: Marriage:Arab-Americans,Arabs, questions
Keywords: Maghreb, endogamy
Date: 7 Nov 92 16:44:51 GMT
Organization: Princeton University
Originator: news@nimaster


-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=| D (unya) => the world
al-Sayyid Kamal al-Tayib al-Fizazi al-Idrissi :^)| H (anyah)=> is easy/restful
(I must admit, my baraka is still quite dormant!)| S (ma)   => the sky
(would someone help me rouse it? anyone? anyone?)| S (afyah)=> is clear/pure
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
From: o.CRepin-leblond@ic.ac.UK (Olivier M.J. Crepin-Leblond, Olivier M.J. 
      Crepin-Leblond)
Subject: >> Who is really "Mr. Bulbul" ? <<
Organization: Imperial College, London, UK.
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 13:36:41 GMT

In this message, I attempt to shed some light over the identity
of "Mr. Bulbul". I would also ask everyone to exercise restraint
with their use of foul language. I am amazed that in the course
of a year, some people have gone down as low as not being able 
to write a sentence without swear words. Pathetic.

So who is "Mr. Bulbul" ? Why does he use foul language ? Is he
who he really is ? Let's try and find out...



>From: nabeel@sce.carleton.ca (Bulbul)
>Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
>Subject: Summing it all (Opinions about Bulbul)
>Message-ID: <nabeel.720817911@regulus.sce.carleton.ca>
>Date: 3 Nov 92 19:11:51 GMT

[...]

>   My "aggrevating messages" were sarcasm of the pathetic situation. To the
>best of my personal accuracy, I do not lie, nor twist facts, nor attempt
>to hurt sincere people even when they make mistakes. However, I may make
>unintentional mistakes (I am not using it as an excuse so don't flame
>already,) I may sometimes be impolite or obscene (as Bdyra pointed out)
>and that is because I believe impolite and obscene remarks have their own
>right places and I am not denying them that.

Impolite remarks, yes. Obscene remarks yes. Mr. Bulbul seems to be great
at those two pastimes. But to the statement "I do not lie", I have
to express my doubts, after thorough investigation of the past 2 months
of s.c.a postings !
Judge for yourself:


First, a posting under the name BULBUL (check out paths, etc. all in the
header):

---------

>From cc.ic.ac.uk!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!mcsun!uunet!utcsri!torn!cunews!regulus.sce.carleton.ca!nabeel Wed Nov  4 13:51:06 gmt 1992
Article: 9286 of soc.culture.arabic
From: nabeel@sce.carleton.ca (Bulbul)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
Subject: Summing it all (Opinions about Bulbul)
Date: 3 Nov 92 19:11:51 GMT
Organization: Carleton University
Status: OR

---------
The above is the posting that Mr. Bulbul has just sent to refute claims
by mmg@doc.ic.ac.uk about him. Note the Path: line. Note the poster
being a certain nabeel@sce.carleton.ca . Note the posting machine
in the path line being regulus.sce.carleton.ca transmitting the message
cunews, then torn, utcsri, and then the backbone uunet. Hence the
end of the path as: uunet!utcsri!torn!cunews!regulus.sce.carleton.ca!nabeel.

Now let's look at  Mr Bulbul's  other identity:

-------

>From cc.ic.ac.uk!doc.ic.ac.uk!agate!ames!haven.umd.edu!uunet!utcsri!torn!cunews!nabeel Fri Oct  2 18:03:10 bst 1992
Article: 8768 of soc.culture.arabic
Newsgroups: talk.politics.mideast,soc.culture.arabic
From: nabeel@sce.carleton.ca (Nabeel Ghuzlaan)
Subject: Re: Answer to Mr John
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 22:17:05 GMT
Status: OR

anwar+@cs.cmu.edu (Anwar Mohammed) writes:
>So now Kuwait is transferring Palestinian personal files to the
>Mossad.  How utterly paranoid.

   I expected you to say so; how could an oily idiot know what is
going under his nose? Probably people like you still think the
Prophet (PBUH) is still alive and he rules Arabia. I am almost
sure that you do not know that a relative of the Israeli Pres
produced a film about oil fires in Kuwait and that the opening
show was held in London and was watched by staffers from the

[... etc. all sorts of other obscenities deleted.... ]
--------

Yes, that's right: Nabeel Ghuzlaan. Same email name, similar path,
and a Message-ID: <nabeel.717977825@oracle.sce.carleton.ca> which
is message reference 717977825 from nabeel at the workstation
called oracle.sce.carleton.ca, another workstation in Carleton University,
Canada. Now let's look at a third posting, obviously forged by
the poster, and using well obnoxious language:

---------

>From cc.ic.ac.uk!doc.ic.ac.uk!agate!spool.mu.edu!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!convex!news.utdallas.edu!corpgate!bnrgate!nrcnet0!cunews!ryad!court!jaber Mon Oct  5 15:39:47 bst 1992
Article: 8804 of soc.culture.arabic
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
From: jaber@court.ahmedi.kt (Sheikh Jaber Subah)
Subject: To Martillo
Oranization: Emiri Court, Kuwait
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 08:17:00 GMT

   Shit was created for people like you to eat, not to post to
this newsgroup. Now fuck off, will ya? Bone apetite (deliberate
"misspelling.")

I do not blame an asshole like you (typical source of shit),
but I blame the naive netters who care to waste their time in
pumping a flat tire like you.

Shit.

--jaber

---------

First mistake by the poster: The country domain for Kuwait is .kw , 
not .kt ! Second mistake: The Organisation field, Carleton University
appeared in the posting. Oh boy, forgot that ? Why because the poster
did a spelling mistake while trying to override the organisation
field and typed: Oranization ! Third mistake: the Message-ID: field
has properly been forged for the site, but horror of horrors,
the poster name, nabeel has appeared, alongside with a message
number similar to nabeel@sce.carleton.ca previous postings.
Then, last problem: the Path: field; although the posting didn't
take the same route to come to here, the obviously forged sites 
'court' and 'ryad' are connected to 'cunews'. And what is 'cunews' ?
Yes, you guessed it right: Carleton University Usenet News server.
By the way, Ryad is actually usually spelled Riyadh. By the way,
Saudi Arabia doesn't have a Usenet News site. By the way, Kuwait
doesn't have a Usenet News site hub either.

Bottom line: Bulbul = Nabeel Ghuzlaan = Sheikh Jaber Subah 

             = nabeel@sce.carleton.ca


So please, Nabeel, Mr. Bulbul, please explain what is going-on.



-- 
Olivier M.J. Crepin-Leblond, Digital Comms. Section, Elec. Eng. Department
 Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2BT, UK
       Internet/Bitnet: <foobar@ic.ac.uk> - Janet: <foobar@uk.ac.ic>

Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
From: mok@frigga.cs.wayne.edu (Mohammad Kanaan)
Subject: Re: Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Copts
Organization: Wayne State University, Detroit
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 18:26:17 GMT

In article <FKITTRED.92Nov5151011@spchp13.BBN.COM>, fkittred@spchp13.BBN.COM (Fletcher Kittredge) writes:
> 
> I am interested in the offical (or unoffical) position of the Muslim
> Brotherhood in regards to civil rights for Copts.  Anyone out there
> know what it is?
> 
> regards,
> fletcher
> 

  I do not know about the official, but if that position is taken from
Islamic viewpoint it is:

  Prophet Mohammad established the law that governs the civil rights
of nonmuslim minorities by saying "Lahum ma alyna wa alyhem ma
alyna" which means "they have the same rights and the same
oblighations as muslims". It is interepreted by all muslim
scholars as freedom of religion worship and a policy of non
descrimination.    
  
  He also said "mn aatha themean fakad aathani" which means "whoever
hurts a nonmuslim, would hurt me".

	Thank to the western media, and some muslims' misunderstanding
of their own religion, this position have been totally deformed and 
portraid as the opposite.

regards,

Mohammad,
mok@cs.wayne.edu

Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
From: dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren)
Subject: Re: Palestine
Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 03:17:14 GMT

mike@vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at (Michael Gschwind) writes:
#astein@nysernet.org (Alan Stein) writes:

#   Or have you really forgotten the fact that it was Jordan that attacked
#   Israel in 1967, that refused to negotiate a territorial compromise

#Trash! Israel attacked!

No, Jordan attacked. Israel was at war with Egypt, and was attacked
by Jordan, Syria, and Iraq. Israel passed two messages (via UN
General Bull) to King Hussein, warning him to stay out of the war
and telling him that nothing will happen if he does. the answer
was shelling and bombing of the Jewish part of Jerusalem and the
coastal region. Possibly, Hussein just couldn't control his army
anymore. 

Here are some quotes from the book "Jordan in the six-day war" written
by a Jordanian journalist, as well as one by the then PLO chief.


Churchill and Churchill, p. 52, quoting Shkairy (PLO chief): "the
surviving Jews would be helped to return to their native countries, but
my estimation is that none will survive".

"..Syrian, Egyptian and Arab propaganda blared over the radio their
message of war, vengence and victory and were listened to by millions
of Arabs in the middle east. They claimed that the hour of reckoning
was at hand and that the Israelis would receive the retribution they
richly desereved. This produced a massive response in favor of
war amongst the Arabs of Jordan...the pressure of public opinion
in favour of war was so strong that king Hussein knew that if he
failed to participate he ran the risk of civil war. King Hussein's
commanders warned him that they could not hold their men in check any 
longer and that there would be a serious crisis if Jordan failed to act".

Jordanian journalist Samir Mutawi, summerizing from interviews
with king Hussein, major general Salim, field marshal Majali,
Lt general Haditha and Ben Shaker, commander in chief of the
Jordanian army.


"There was in the country and all over the Arab world what you
might call a mass euphoria about the possibility of war and that
this was something we have been waiting for a long time - we
were going to defeat Israel once and for all".

As told to Jordanian journalist Samir Mutawi in an 1983 interview
by Zaid Rifai, a senior aid to king Hussein, and two times
Jordanian prime minister.


-Danny Keren.


Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
From: ddsokol@unix.amherst.edu (D. DANIEL SOKOL)
Subject: Re: Dear Egyptians (The Israeli SPY)
Organization: Amherst College
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 02:44:47 GMT

Well, I don't really think that the only reason for bad relations between
America and the Arab world is the fault of the creation and the perpetuation
of the State of Israel.  I think that the larger problem lies in the fact that
there is a major clash between the American project of Liberal-democracy
and the despotic tyranny found in most Arab countries.  Furthermore, many
wars in the Middle East such as the Yemeni civil war in the 1960's, the 
Iran-Iraq war, the current conflict between Qatar and Saudi Arabia and
Desert Storm had nothing to do with Israel.  All of these cases show a clash between certain arab interests and those of the U.S.

Danny Sokol-Amherst College

Xref: sparky soc.culture.arabic:4870 soc.culture.lebanon:4981
From: scemg@thor.cf.ac.uk ("M.G")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic,soc.culture.lebanon
Subject: ARAB UNITY
Date: 12 Nov 92 10:00:59 GMT
Organization: University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff, Wales, UK
X-Mailer: Cardiff Computing Maths PP Mail Open News Gateway

Many articles have been written about ARAB UNITY
I beleive that ***NO WAY THAT THE ARAB WILL UNITE***
as long as :

-THE ARAB CHRISTIANS CONSIDER FRANCE IS THEIR MOTHER COUNTRY

-THE ARAB NATIONALIST WHO THINK THAT SADDAM, ASSAD, AND AFLAG
 ARE GREAT LEADERS

-THE GULF PEOPLE WHO BELEIVE THAT USA IS GOD AND THEIR SAVIOUR

           ************

THE ONLY SOLUTION IS THE ISLAMIC UNITY


M.G.

CRDIFF,WALES, U.K.
From: hernlem@chess.ncsu.EDU (Brad Hernlem)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
Subject: Re: Dear Egyptians (The Israeli SPY)
Date: 13 Nov 92 17:18:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: ncsu.1992Nov13.171833.424
Reply-To: hernlem@chess.ncsu.EDU (Brad Hernlem)
Organization: North Carolina State University

In article <1992Nov13.162959.3877@cs.brown.edu>, dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny
Keren) writes:
> marwang@caip.rutgers.edu (Marwan Gharaybeh) writes:
> #dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren) writes:
> 
> ##I agree that Arabs are not always described fairly in the Western
> ##(especially US) film industry. But I don't think it has a lot to do
> ##with racism, anti-Islam sentiment or anything of that sort. It has
> ##to do with the fact that the US had its share of clashes with 
> ##Arab/Muslim states/organizations.
> 
> #I agree. However, the only instances that there had been clashes between
> #moslem/arab groups and the US is israel-related. the moslem/arab
> #people have the blame of creating the illegal state of Israel in
> #the heart of the arab land. 
> 
> There is no such thing as an illegal state.

Just a minor point here, if you say that there is no such thing as an
"illegal" state then I contend that there is no such thing as a "right
to exist" as far as countries go.

> #Had there been no Israel I do not 
> #beleive that there would have been clashes between the
> #Israeli-driven-american-interests and the moslem/arab interests.
> #What I said includes clashes such as terrorism/herowism attacks by
> #moslem/arab gorilla and may even include the iranian hostages.
> 
> No. Blaming Israel for all the Arab vs. Arab and/or American vs.
> Arab clashes makes no sense. You want to believe that is the
> case, fine, but that's not the way to solve the mideast problems.
> 
> 
> -Danny Keren.
> 

Brad Hernlem (hernlem@chess.ncsu.EDU)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
From: ahmed@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ahmed El-Habbash)
Subject: Re: Israel Apartheid????
Organization: DSG, Dept. of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 17:37:32 GMT

In <1992Nov7.030329.18909@cs.brown.edu> dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren) writes:

>mike@vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at (Michael Gschwind) writes:

>#The Law of Return is definitely racist, it meets all the criteria - it
>#singles out groups according to race & religion, per definitionem
>#racism! 

>1) The law of return has no relation to race, only to religion. you
>   better check out before you make such accusations.

When we talk about race, normally we consider human races, but this
situation is different, humanity and human rights are not considered at
all.

I don't know what would you describe this situation when people who are
born in Palestine are driven out to be replaced by people who never seen
that land before.

I don't know what do you describe this situation when a Palestinian 
who was born and brought up in Palestine has no right even to visit his
remaining relatives who are living as captives in their home land.


>2) The law does not treat non-Jews in any racist way, because no
>   country in the world just lets anyone come in. It does give
>   Jews a special benefit in that they come to Israel without any
>   restrictions. Considering the fact that Jews have been
>   persecuted and murdered almost everywhere they lived, culminating
>   in the Holocaust when the world stood looking and shrugged, I
>   think the law is understandable. Seeing what is happening recently
>   in Germany, Italy and Austria makes it even more understandable.

You mean the jews in Palestine have the right to do what they are
currently doing to the Palestinians, because those jews were treated
badly in Germaany and Italy ?

I see !
>-Danny Keren.

Ahmed
From: aaldoubo@copper.denver.colorado.edu (Ohm Jihad)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
Subject: Re: Is Assad dead?
Date: 8 Nov 92 04:29:59 GMT
Organization: University of Colorado at Denver

>In article <5405@daily-planet.concordia.ca> ilyess@ECE.Concordia.CA (Ilyess Bdira) writes:
>
>I heard a strange piece of "news" this morning from unreliable
>sources; That Assad is dead two to four days ago?
>Anybody heard this rumor..

These rumors seem to occur often ... unfortunately, they are
usually false.

>I hope it is not just some wishful thinking by the syrians (from
>where I got this information) This kind of thing happened to Brejniev
>many times before the real thing eventually happened.

Wishful thinking by a lot more than just the Syrians.  Insha'Allah
very, very soon.

>I heard The next in line is even worse than Assad anyway.

You mean like Rafik and Co.?

Yeah, in the case of Assad's family, it was just more than one
bad apple that spoiled the whole barrel.

Anisa

Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
From: fali@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Fathei Ali)
Subject: Re: forgery on the net (Is that true) Please read !!
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 20:25:12 GMT

In article <1dbc9fINNt6d@frigate.doc.ic.ac.uk> mmg@doc.ic.ac.uk (M M Ghanem) writes:
>Dear all, Have you read the last message by Olivier Crepin-leblond.
>
>If not please read it. To sum it all up. It says that some people are using 
>forgery to send messages to the network. People using other people's names to
>end obscene messages. If that is true I don't have anything more to say!

    I wouldn't call that. It was obvious to those who read the group 
    regularly that the messages signed by "Bulbul" and
    "Sheikh Jaber Subah" originated from the same point as those
    of Nabeel;
           nabeel@sce.carleton.ca 
    From the start I thought Nabeel or someone with access to 
    his account was sending these messages just to play the 
    devil's advocate. You could tell from the sarcastic tone
    in those postings. Although the above mentioned postings 
    might've offensive to some, they were also provocative and
    self-critical.

-- 
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     Department of chemistry        /      l         \ l          l l  
        U of T, Toronto        ,O__l___|___l_C   ,O  ,ll___|_|_|__l l  
        Canada M5S 1A1         |        **       |
From: khaled@zeus.csc.ncsu.edu (Khaled El-Sayed)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
Subject: Re: Dear Egyptians (The Israeli SPY)
Date: 13 Nov 92 16:19:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: druid.gr-kme.721671581
Reply-To: khaled@zeus.csc.ncsu.edu
Organization: North Carolina State University
Originator: gr-kme@druid.csc.ncsu.edu

ddsokol@unix.amherst.edu (D. DANIEL SOKOL) writes:

>Well, I don't really think that the only reason for bad relations between
>America and the Arab world is the fault of the creation and the perpetuation
>of the State of Israel.  I think that the larger problem lies in the fact that
>there is a major clash between the American project of Liberal-democracy
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>and the despotic tyranny found in most Arab countries.  Furthermore, many
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Do you really believe that this is true? It is apparent that the
American Govt. at least is happy to have good relations with such
tyrant governments if they serve the american benefits. For example, the
good relation between the Americans and the 'Aal Seoud' Family in Saudi
Arabia.
 
>wars in the Middle East such as the Yemeni civil war in the 1960's, the 
>Iran-Iraq war, the current conflict between Qatar and Saudi Arabia and
>Desert Storm had nothing to do with Israel.  All of these cases show a clash between certain arab interests and those of the U.S.

It is all summed up as follows: Arab countries should not be a
controlling power (even their own resources) come what may, be it Israel 
or any other tool, this should always be the case. The good question that 
arabs should ask themselves, is why is this the case and is there anyway 
out of it and how?

Salam,

Khaled


-- 
Khaled M. F. El-Sayed            |  e-mail: khaled@zeus.csc.ncsu.edu
Department of Computer Science   |  Voice : 919-515-7533 (Office)
North Carolina State University  |          919-515-7346 (CCSP Lab)
Raleigh, NC 27695-8207, U.S.A.   |  To be is to do!
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic,soc.culture.lebanon
From: Michael F. Kamprath <kamprath@space-grant.sprl.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Saddam and Bush defeat
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 92 13:31:15 EST
Organization: University of Michigan, Aerospace Engineering
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A720242B6A03C4FC@sprl-mac2016.sprl.umich.edu>
X-Xxdate: Fri, 6 Nov 92 19:31:23 GMT

In article <5430.9211051110@thor.cf.ac.uk> M.G, scemg@thor.cf.ac.uk writes:
>This morning I heard that in Baghdad they are celebrating Bush's defeat.
>It's ironic how the armies of 28 countries failed to overthrow the dictator
>Saddam Hossein, yet it was the ballot which overthrew Bush.  Just goes to 
>show how much more difficult change is in the absence of democracy. 
>

I think this (not "defeating" Saddam) was more of a strategic decision by 
the West (as promoted by Saudi Arabia) than an indication of their inability
to carry it out.  Not that I agreed with it, though.

========================================================================
| Michael F. Kamprath                   | The University of Michigan   |
|   kamprath@space-grant.sprl.umich.edu |      Aerospace Engineering   |
|   kamprath@engin.umich.edu            |      Graduate Student        |
+---------------------------------------+------------------------------+
| This country is a _democracy_.  We all must take responsibility for  | 
| our government's actions because we the people are legally the basis |
| of its existence.  This means that we all owe at least $10,000 each  |  
| on the national debt.  You can't get something for for free.         |
========================================================================