HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: karlg@fulcrum.co.uk (Karl Greenow)
Subject: Re: Lovely film, I cried
Organization: Fulcrum Communications
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:51:37 GMT

>>I think the snake bite is a reference to the Barclycard advert where Rowan
>>finds someone who is suffering from a snake bite

>A bite of a snake or the effects of a 'snakebite'?  Anyway, thanks: not
>being a television-watcher the adverts had escaped my notice.

Oh good GRIEF! I was only trying to be subtle. Piglet said my 
scansion [sic] sucked and made a bit of a rude allusion. I
mentioned Rowan only in connection with the advert where he discovers
a bloke suffering from a bite, quickly goes to suck out the venom, then
discovers that the bite is in fact in the region of his meat and two
veg. It was quite funny, honest...

That sort of situation would show who your *real* friends are, I s'pose.
Reminds me of Cynthia Plastercaster & the lovely story about Jimi
Hendrix.

>Ooooo... haven't seen you around here before... a*noth*er local muffin?

I think the phrase is "Christmas has come early this year", Kay.

--
Karl Greenow                                        karlg@fulcrum.co.uk
Fulcrum Communications Ltd, Fordrough Lane, Birmingham, B9 5LD, ENGLAND
Tel: +44 203 631553 (Make My Day - Fill My Answering Machine)
From: rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Bi-wariness
Date: 25 Jan 1993 09:40:39 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu

In article <1993Jan22.222156.15418@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Scorpii) writes:
	
->The trouble I have, as a bi male, is that I often find myself attracted to
->bi women who seem MUCH more attracted to women.  Even when there seems to be
->a distinct connection between us, she will tend to avoid anything serious,
->and will gravitate toward a female-female relationship.  How common is this,
->and do the males here seem to experience a similar gravitation toward males? 
->I consider myself a Kinsey 2, which is a rather uncomfortable situation.

Well, I have no idea what my Kinsey rating is ... it seems that emotionally
I'm more attracted to women, but physically and sexually I'm more attracted
to men (aren't cocks just absolutely wonderfully beautiful?).

Let me put it this way: I recently went to bed with two people who I had
known for something like 3 hours or less.  One was male, one was female.  I
knew them equally well, I interacted heavily with the man, and didn't
actually touch the female.  Wasn't really comfortable with it.

So ... am I a K2 or a K4? 

Doesn't matter :)

And no ... not all bifems are K4.5+ ... I used to think that, but I know too
many who are not.

Quite a few of them will perhaps prefer women aesthetically, but again,
emotional relations are different ... 

I know quite a few bifems are are _not_ heavily much more into women ...
some of them may have a slight preference, but some of them also just like
to go to bed with women for the sex ... 

I suspect you just happened to go through a streak :)

-roy
-- 
Roy S. Rapoport     internet: rsr@soda.berkeley.edu      bitnet: rsrsoda@ucbocf
anonymous mail: wi.5836@n7kbt.rain.com        androphile, gynophile, kerryphile
"What I used to think is me / is just a faded memory." -NIN
"No mayonnaise in Ireland"
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: kay@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Kay Dekker)
Subject: Re: what is sex (was Re: Daoism, Pooh, and Bisexuals)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 11:48:03 GMT

In article <C1GLGB.K6H@dcs.ed.ac.uk> pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley) writes:
>Quoting kay@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Kay Dekker) in article <1993Jan25.183116.26693@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>:
>>In article <C17ID0.An2@dcs.ed.ac.uk> pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley) writes:
>>[on defining 'sex']
>>>Kay could probably answer this better than me, I know.
>>O this is tricky.  I'm probably the worst person in the world to attempt
>>to answer this.
>
>This was exactly the answer I was trying to say, that it gets impossible
>to know when to call it sex.

Yes.  Yesyesyes.  It's heuristic, not algorithmic.

>>You wonder stuff like this and your brain melts.
>>
>>		Between the motion and the act
>>		Falls the Shadow.
>
>Wonder stuff?

No, not The Wonder Stuff, it's T S Eliot, talking about how introspection
decouples simple desire from the world.  I think.

>"Oh, say it's not true, the things they said we do,
>Oh, how can I explain the pleasure in the pain?"
>
>(Don't Let Me Down, Gently --- Hup --- The Wonder Stuff)

You're right.  That too.

			Kay (musing)
-- 
the Crisco Kid: quiet, shy, mono, Armani-suited.  Not.  idx009@uk.ac.cov.cck
From: dwells@lonestar.utsa.edu (Darren . Wells)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: gratuitous mumbling
Date: 26 Jan 93 20:13:29 GMT
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio

In article <C1A0IC.4Js@news.udel.edu>
 eowyn@chopin.udel.edu (Zoe Antonia Velonis) writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.035159.16413@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>
 dwells@lonestar.utsa.edu (Darren . Wells) writes:
>>In article <C14AEB.8JG@news.udel.edu>
>> eowyn@brahms.udel.edu (Zoe Antonia Velonis) writes:
>>>
>>>Crash space is available...no roommate for the next three weeks....
>>>need I say more?
>>
>>Wow . . . is this an open invitation?
>
>um...depends who's asking...for you?  anytime....

*swoon*  Really?
I might be up there (for real) around the 14th (of Feb).

>*flirt*   *wink*

*wink*   *flirt*   *flirt*

>>Coming Soon . . . Soc.bi party at Zoe's . . .
>>(for those of us on this side of the pond who can't make it to
>>Dave's party)
>
>Oh boy....my roommate would *love* me!

All the more reason then!  Shall we set a date?  ;-)

>   But she does have a boyfriend,
>and has warned me that he'll be staying over a lot...retaliation time!
>
>How 'bout me and Jim have a joint party? He's already throwing a huge
>one this weekend...

Which I missed.  *pout*  But I have this strange feeling there will
be more of those . . .

>mid-February, huh?
>*flirt* *flirt*

See above.  *flirt*

>Zoe
>(soon-to-be shameless e-flirt)

*Soon-to-be*?  Is there some shame in there I missed?

hugs and things

Darren
(who will settle for just "e-flirt")
From: moragw@castle.ed.ac.uk (Alloy Serving Woman)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Bisexuality and androgyny
Date: 27 Jan 93 13:32:23 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University


I find this topic quite revealing regarding people's opinion of others.

Personally I avoid shrill squeaky women like the plague, in just the
same way as I avoid men who are little more than a vaguely sentient
extension of their penis.

I prefer people whose appearance changes with their mood, not the ones
who only believe in _their_ way of looking and never change it.  I
suppose this is linked to my desire that people shouldn't judge me from
my attire the first time they meet me (I know, I know, a rather futile
hope)  Having been dismissed as 'a greasy biker' when met in leathers
and clutching lid, and instantly judged to be some sort of butch
lesbian, or treated like I was a fragile goth fit only for male
consumption when wafting around in velvet.  I resisted the temptation to
deck the bastard who thought I was a girlie stripper when he saw me in
fishnets and that took considerable effort.  Not that I believe in
violence, but sometimes.....

I drool over tall skeletal people regardless of their gender, but its
purely aesthetic.  Honestly.  And I _love_ long hair, flowing down a
bare back, floating in the water SORRY, sorry, I digress.

It doesn't really matter what I fancy because women make me nervous and
I feel threatened around men.  I am doing my best to overcome this and
have actually reached the stage when I can hug men and be in a room full
of them without beginning to shake and be flooded with horrible
memories, but sometimes I still suffer setbacks.  I'll get there in the
end, can't turn to the solace of chocolate all my life.

Speaking of chocolate..

Mo, gone hunting.

************************************************************************
                         ALLOY SERVING WOMEN
************************************************************************
From: bvntyler@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Very [Bi]Sexual Professional Amateur Nudist!)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: I'm coming!
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:19:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <C1E4xC.Dw3@news.udel.edu>, eowyn@ravel.udel.edu (Zoe Antonia Velonis) writes...
>In article <C1E1nt.C7L@acsu.buffalo.edu> bvntyler@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Very [Bi]Sexual Professional Amateur Nudist!) writes:
>>
>>*tah DAH!* Demuffining of what has to be the worlds BIggest MUFFIN! *GRIN*
>>
>>--Dave
> 
>yum....
>needed one of those....
>Zoe
>(welcome!)


 trust me there's plenty to go around!

 *snugglehuglickLICKKgropeKISS*

--Dave
*******************************************************************************
def: faggot; a small stick. | "I ain't no Faggot!            I'm a LOG!"
                            |
B1 h f- t w- g+ k+ sv m e+ r| I vow to Never work 14 hours a day again!
                    ?       | unfortunately needs to work 14 hours a day
                            | to save for the move to Texas!!!!!
From: mlloyd@castle.ed.ac.uk (M Lloyd)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Gripe: soc.motss
Date: 23 Jan 93 20:41:37 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

daz@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (Darren Primm) writes:
>as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Scorpii) writes:
[On soc.motss]
>>Please tell me there are people without complexes who post there.
>There are people without complexes that post there.

Agreed.  What bothers me about the first statement is the implication
that soc.bi somehow lacks people with complexes.  As a group, we're 
friendly, sure, but complex free?  Balanced?  Mature?  Gimme a break.  
There's often a thin line between queer and wierd, and that's demonstrated
here on a daily basis.  That has the concomitant potentials for refreshing
oddness or irritating senselessness.

hugs all the same
Mike, using an old account in a vain attempt to keep in touch with this
place
-- 
Mike Lloyd, B0/1 h- f- t w- g+ k+ s m- e? |    "Bloody nose and burning eyes
      Retro-hippy, music nut, bi and      |  Raised in laughter to the skies"
          backrubber of devotion          |                 - Bruce Cockburn
               --The end of confusion is the beginning of death--
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: seamus@ravel.udel.edu (James G Dilmore)
Subject: Re: This is a post.
Keywords: Whatever.
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 22:31:36 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.220741.20253@midway.uchicago.edu> ss19@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <1993Jan25.181453.22284@cbnews.cb.att.com> eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (Piglet) writes:
>>
>>How does a North NJ soc.bi party sound?  Anyone?  Anyone?
>
>   When?
>   david parsons \bi/ blatant e-slut
Omi David will be there.  Let me know definitely.
Jim - who did that dog trick again.

-- 
Jim Dilmore - seamus@brahms.udel.edu    or    dilmore@che.udel.edu 
   Deconstruct your Gender      AIDS KILLS.  Practice safe sex.        
Plummet headlong first.  Grasp the unattainable. Redfine all that has 
been taught to you. Understand the power of a single action. 
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: dms4s@helga13.acc.Virginia.EDU (Sailor on the Seas of Fate)
Subject: Re: Clueless hetboys and bi's
Organization: University of Virginia Computer Science Department
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 23:40:36 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.225716.21801@reed.edu> tjewell@gluttony.reed.edu (Teresa Jewell) writes:
>In article <1k0ghk$47a@agate.berkeley.edu> rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S.  
>Rapoport) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan22.000051.10916@midway.uchicago.edu>  
>elle@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>> 
>> ->I might add that the worst soc.bi generally has to deal with are the
>> ->clueless straight boyz who Just Want to Watch.
>> 
>> Umm, this is just probably due to _my_ experiences, but this sort of  
>made me
>> cringe ...
>> 
>> I read this as sort of a putdown of straight, voyeuristic men.
>> 
>> -roy
>
>   
[some deleted stuff] 
>    Straight boyz Just Want To Watch, but don't want to support queer  
>rights or lesbigay friends is what I believe the poster referred to.
>
>T Jewell

   Hmmm being new to this group I'm curious as to how many other
straight guys are out there reading this who really give a damn about
the issues and feelings expressed here?  I first read this group when
a dear friend told me she is bisexual.  I was concerned about her and
the emotional time she was going through.  I was curious about the
type of lifestyle she was turning towards. 
   I am very glad that I read this group.  I have discovered here a
network of truly caring and loving people. I am constantly reassured
that my bi friend is a member of good company.
   And yes, i admit, I would like to watch sometime :).

*HUG*s all around

Dave

Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: miket@hermes.tcs.com (Michael Turner nmscore Assoc.)
Subject: Re: what is sex (was Re: Daoism, Pooh, and Bisexuals)
Organization: Teknekron Communications Inc.
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:49:19 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.114803.4041@dcs.warwick.ac.uk> kay@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Kay Dekker) writes:
>In article <C1GLGB.K6H@dcs.ed.ac.uk> pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley) writes:
>>Quoting kay@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Kay Dekker) in article <1993Jan25.183116.26693@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>:
>>>In article <C17ID0.An2@dcs.ed.ac.uk> pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley) writes:
>>>You wonder stuff like this and your brain melts.
>>>
>>>		Between the motion and the act
>>>		Falls the Shadow.
>>
>>Wonder stuff?
>
>No, not The Wonder Stuff, it's T S Eliot, talking about how introspection
>decouples simple desire from the world.  I think.

No, no, NO!  T.S.E. is talking about how desire simply decouples the world
from introspection.  Something to think about as the peach juice is
dribbling down your chin while you walk along the nude beach all
self-conscious about whether rolling up your long pants will make your
pale skinny chicken-skin legs even more conspicuous than keeping them
clothed, not even noticing those two mermaids about to leap from the
waves and drag you in, belting out "Surfin' Safari" at each other
and laughing hysterically as they push your head under for the third
time...."That'll teach HIM to ask `What is sex?'!"

....Sorry.  The weather just got nice here, after more rain than drought-
stricken California has had in seven years, and I'm having a premature
outbreak of spring fever.  Back to your usual program of droll rejoinders
and Graydon-sniping.
---
Michael Turner
miket@tcs.com
From: muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Bisexuality and androgyny
Date: 28 Jan 93 14:48:34
Organization: Natural Language Incorporated
	<1k2a10INNq9o@network.ucsd.edu>
	<1993Jan27.200605.15795@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
	<1k6sdtINN9td@umbc5.umbc.edu>
	<1993Jan28.083823.15443@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: crisp@dcs.warwick.ac.uk's message of Thu, 28 Jan 1993 08:38:23 GMT

In article <1993Jan28.083823.15443@dcs.warwick.ac.uk> crisp@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Badvoc) writes:
>In <1k6sdtINN9td@umbc5.umbc.edu> ac999273@umbc.edu (ac999273) writes:
>Someone else writes:
>>>I don't like men who look very masculine. They make me feel uncomftable.
>>>Alough I find the feminine look very attractive I prefer women who don't
>>>look so feminine. I don't know. This might just be me being strange.
>>	I don't know, perhaps I am strange, but I like feminine women 
>>and masculine men.  I have never liked feminine men.... that's ick to me.

>Well, I don't know how a man could be feminine without being "ick".

Why?

Me, I like my men feminine, my women feminine, and *me* feminine.
*grin*.  (Actually, I also like all of the above masculine - it just
depends on which characteristics you pick, in each case.  Nor are they
mutually exclusive, by any means.)

Muffy
--

Muffy Barkocy                      |~Never had a lot of faith in human beings/
muffy@mica.berkeley.edu            | but sometimes we manage to shine/like a
"amorous inclinations"? Aha! I'm   | light on a hill beaming out to space/from
not "not straight," I'm *inclined*.| somewhere hard to find~ - Bruce Cockburn
From: mlloyd@ocf.berkeley.edu (M. Lloyd)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Are most of us Hetero guys really that insensitive?
Date: 26 Jan 1993 21:59:31 GMT
Organization: U. C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
NNTP-Posting-Host: lightning.berkeley.edu

jsb16@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jennifer S Broekman) writes:
>mlloyd@ocf.berkeley.edu (M. Lloyd) writes:
>>It's as true as it ever was: a good man is hard to find.
>
>Or, as my SO's mother says: A good man is hard to find, and vice versa.
>;-)

*grin* I avoided that line since I've a proven record of failing to
respond "appropriately" to good hard-ons attached to life-support
systems.  I may be working on my Queeniness (Queenosity?), but it seems
I'll never make it to classic Rampant Strumpethood.  Gimme a limp wimp
with heart and mind, and no doubt I'll mother him into a little growth,
but I just can't handle cock-sure Studlies with their male egos
un-pricked.  (Hey - I bet the "Accepting Feminism" line applies again
:-)

>-jenneke, trying to lure her fiance' out of muffinhood.

Ooh yeah - we need more of his kind around here.  The general reader may
be advised that this gentleperson is of sound mind and *very* sound body
(gadzooks, what a back!).  C'mon in, B, the water's lovely!

hugs back Eastward
Mike
-- 
Mike Lloyd, B0/1 h- f- t w- g+ k+ s m- e? |    "Bloody nose and burning eyes
      Retro-hippy, music nut, bi and      |  Raised in laughter to the skies"
          backrubber of devotion          |                 - Bruce Cockburn
               --The end of confusion is the beginning of death--
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale)
Subject: Re: Biphobic girlfriend!?!
Keywords: help!
Organization: DSG, Dept. of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 16:35:44 GMT

In <1993Jan23.220231.15773@midway.uchicago.edu>
h431@quads.uchicago.edu (heather e blair) writes:
>bhat@mullauna.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Timothy Alan Heath BELL) writes:
>>After going out with my girlfriend for six weeks (my first girlfiend -- I'd
>>only had boyfriends before), I'm now realising how biphobic she is. [...]
>
>Is there a bi group nearby you could take her to?  Does she have access to
>soc.bi?  Maybe you could get ahold of "Bi Any Other Name" or "Bisexual Lives"
>for her.

I wouldn't recommend "Bisexual Lives" as a first reader in bisexuality.
Because of the small number of personal accounts in it (only 12), I
don't think it shows enough variety and scope of bisexuality, and
because the majority of these accounts are by people who are
non-monogamous, I think, if read on its own, it might reinforce the
idea that if you are bisexual then you are also non-monogamous. I think
"Bi Any Other Name", which has over 70 personal accounts, is much
better for a first read.


Ciaran.
-- 
---- Ciaran McHale (cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie)
\bi/ Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
 \/  Telephone: +353-1-7021539 FAX: +353-1-6772204
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: gdb15@grebe.cl.cam.ac.uk (Guy Barry)
Subject: Re: Lovely film, I cried
Reply-To: gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk
Organization: U of Cambridge Computer Lab, UK
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 11:25:06 GMT

In article <1993Jan20.210928.10009@cbnews.cb.att.com> eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (Piglet) writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.170008.28557@infodev.cam.ac.uk> gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk writes:
>>No, Karl's clearly a budding poet:
>>
>>   Last evening, whilst in Kay's domain,
>>   I watched "The Crying Game"...
>
>And a bad one, too.  His scansion sucks!  (No comment on what else
>might engage in that kind of behavior...)

Eh?  It's perfect: iambic tetrameter followed by iambic trimeter.  The
verse *might* continue like this (I make no claim of artistic merit,
nor of reflecting Karl's actual sentiment!):

   Last evening, whilst in Kay's domain,
   I watched "The Crying Game";
   For reasons that I can't explain,
   I felt a sense of shame.

Just a minute, aren't you the person who recently claimed on soc.singles
that Douglas Adams invented the phrase "believe six impossible things
before breakfast"?

--
Guy Barry, University of Cambridge | Phone: +44 (0)223 334757 
Computer Laboratory                | Fax: +44 (0)223 334678
New Museums Site, Pembroke Street  | JANET: Guy.Barry@uk.ac.cam.cl 
Cambridge CB2 3QG, England, UK     | Internet: Guy.Barry@cl.cam.ac.uk 
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: an2839@anon.penet.fi (Archer)
Subject: Re: Gay soda! I'm so excited!
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: soc.bi
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 06:31:47 GMT

Note: I don't read MOTSS, but just in case you are following this
thread, I decided to keep the To: line intact.

Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison) writes:
> While it's not as good as Coca-Cola Classic, it is much
> better than regular Pepsi -- it's not quite so *cloyingly*
> sweet, though it's a bit weak on flavor. I'm fond of C^3's
> almost-piney "bite."

But it doesn't have caffene!  The things that keep me going is sex,
hugs, sleep, and caffeene.  I should at least be getting one of the
four lately.  :(

> I wonder what they're planning on doing for CANS of the stuff,

They have.

-"Archer"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
From: jrk@sys.uea.ac.uk (Richard Kennaway)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Graph theory (was Re: Appearances on and off the net)
Date: 21 Jan 93 09:23:37 GMT
Organization: UEA School of Information Systems, Norwich, UK.

In <C15Kx0.79z@dcs.ed.ac.uk> pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley) writes:
>>difficult to explain.  The time to start getting worried is when
>>you need line crossing or a non-planar medium to get it all on.

>Yup, I've reached that stage.  It needs either (a) a set of five people
>who have all slept with each other, or (b) two sets of three people such
>that all of one set have slept with all of the other.

Not quite.  The graph must have K5 or K3,3 as a minor, but not necessarily
as a subgraph.

--                                ____
Richard Kennaway                  \ _/__    School of Information Systems
Internet:  jrk@sys.uea.ac.uk       \X  /    University of East Anglia
uucp:  ...mcsun!ukc!uea-sys!jrk      \/     Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K.
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: litterst@pecan.cns.udel.edu (Stephen Litterst)
Subject: Re: First Post! (was FAQ)
Organization: University of Delaware, Newark
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:04:53 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.232429.9309@midway.uchicago.edu> ss19@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.174652.5042@ctp.com> ebail@ctp.com (Erik Bailey) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan21.025154.352@midway.uchicago.edu> ss19@midway.uchicago.edu (Orc) writes:
>
>    I'm visiting a couple of friends there (Hi, Elaine and Grant!)
>because a mutual friend is visiting me from the UK and we both want
>to visit the Providence crew sooner or later.  I rather like (aside
>from the lack of mass transit) Providence.
>
>                 ____
>   david parsons \bi/ Aren't all bisexuals trainspotters?
>                  \/
I much prefer camel spotting myself...  Much more challenging.  So, are you
going to bring this mutual friend down to DE?  Could be dangerous though...
Prolonged exposure to the UDel contingent could be hazardous to your health.

			Steve L. (Realizing that orc won't get this for a
					while seeing as he is now in transit
					to DE. Or so I've been told.)
-- 
| Stephen C. Litterst           |*HUG*HUG*HUG*HUG*HUG*HUG*HUG*HUG*HUG*HUG*|  
| kyraan@bach.udel.edu          |       More man than you'll ever be...   |
| litterst@pecan.cns.udel.edu    \   More woman than you'll ever get.     |
|_guido@gnu.ai.mit.edu____________\ ______________________________________|