From: dcrosgr@uoft02.utoledo.edu
Newsgroups: talk.rape
Subject: Re: To Synth: Sexism not intended ...
Date: 27 Jul 92 20:37:25 EST
Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services

In article <1992Jul27.225030.4020@brtph560.bnr.ca>, kimmyd@bnr.ca (Kimmy Posey P920) writes:
> Synth,
> 
>   I certainly didn't mean to sound sexist with words about protecting women.
> Didn't I add a postscript?  Might not have.  Anyway, I didn't mean to imply
> that women need men to run around protecting them all the time.  Indeed I have
> some female friends that are *VERY* formidable.  I guess that what I'm saying
> is that having been raised in a very, very old southern family my belief sys-
> tem tells me this:  You see a man assaulting a women.  Kill him.  DO NOT PASS
> GO, DO NOT COLLECT $200.  

You forgot the first part of that phrase, which is, "Go directly to jail."



				Foreign aggressor threatens The State (including
> home, hearth, wife, children) destroy aggressor in-situ.

And if the foreign agressor is us? As in Desert Storm (I know, we were coming
to someone else's aid. That makes it O.K. I guess to invade another country
That hasn't done squat to us, other than upset our economy based on oil.)
Or in Panama. (Tell me, what did Noriaga do that warranted us sending in troops
besides telling us her would not step down just because we wanted him to.)

I don't remember Quadaffi ever invading our home and hearth. (We THINK he may
have supported terrorism.) Did the North Koreans ever set foot in the U.S., or
were we just in the way when they tried to re-unify their country? (Which we
split up ourselves, and tried keeping apart because the North Korean system of
government was one WE did not like.) Did the Kaiser ever do squat to us 
when we entered World War I? (Accidentally torpedoed a boat sailing through 
a war zone, just as we accidentally missled a passanger plane flying from Iran.
If the Germans deserved us invading them for that, then we deserved the 
Iranains invading the U.S. for our mistake.)

When we killed off tribe after tribe of indians, who was invading whom's home
and hearth?

Spanish American War, who was taking territory away from whom?

Should I go on?

If you believe that the soldiers invading home and hearth deserve to die, then
you believe that the U.S. should have been beaten in each of these conflicts.

History loves a winner, and might makes right.

Now, knowing all of that, the ONLY war a person should ever fantasize about is
World War II. We were attacked, we defended.

If someone fantasizes about being a war hero in any other conflict, he is as
'sick' as someone who fantasizes about rape.

Both involve fanatsizing about agressively causing extreme emotional pain and
suffering on another human being WITHOUT their consent.

Provided one can seperate reality from fantasy, and does not really want to do
either, NEITHER fantsay is sick.
  
					The point is that
> I believe that a true man is willing to put his body / life between a lady
> and Harms Way whenever it is called for.

Does this apply to ONLY women, or men as well? Are you not required to help
defend the innocent male against injustice as well?

And if so, why are you advocating hanging all of the potentially guilty?
Especially when you know that some of them are innocent?  

						Not at other times.  Women are
> indeed capable of taking care of themselves.  Without a doubt.  But most women
> could not defend themselves against a big collard-green eatin' maniac bent on
> hurting 'em.  

And most men could? Or do you simply not give a damn about a man who can't,
'cause he's a pussy anyway? A faggot/homo who don't deserve to live?

		In that case it is my duty as a man to step in and deliver a
> lethal set-o-lumps to said maniac before the lady gets hurt.  This attitude
> may be sexist but I don't think I could change the way I feel about it.

Go to soc.feminism. After they tear you to shreds, you might think a bit
differently.

DC

PS. And make no mistake, they WOULD tear you up.

Newsgroups: talk.rape