HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pnorman@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Happy the Man)
Subject: Twin Peaks - sound samples?
Summary: any WAV files out there?   
Keywords: sounds, WAV, PC-ATI Stereo F/X, SND BLSTR, ADLB
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
Distribution: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:18:50 GMT

Does anyone know of a site where I could get sound files from Twin
Peaks?  I do not have a Mac.  The files at the ftp site in australia are
for Mac, aren;t they?  Is there any way to convert these sound files to
something compatible with my PC?  I have a Sound Blaster/Adlib
compatible card from ATI Tech called Stereo F/X.  I have really cool
.WAV files from DUNE, HIGHLANDER, THE BLUES BROTHERS, etc.  I would
really like some from TP.  Can anyone help?

Please reply to me personally at pnorman@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (or just
reply (r) to this post.  I will post any info I might receive to the TP
newsgroup.  

I have seen othere ask this very same question but have never seen a
response; which seems odd - why are there no PC playable sounds on the
Audrey site?  There MUST be a lot of users out there who would like such
files.  Please help.

Thank you very much
Happy
colours that flicker in water...
 


Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: guppy@wixer.cactus.org (Jennifer Mery)
Subject: Re: 11/18/92 episode...One of the funniest 30 min of TV ever...
Keywords: Huh?
Organization: Real/Time Communications
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 23:01:44 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.154201.25021@bmerh85.bnr.ca> dwalker@bnr.ca (David Walker) writes:
>
>Ok, enough already...  I wonder if I saw the same show as everyone else.
>I thought that there were some good moments in this week's show but most
>of the time the show seemed to be centered around some sort of inside joke
>that they never came right out and explained.
>
>Was this another episode about some sort of NYC thing?
If the NYC folks claim that they have the inside track on this one,
they're going too far! :) :)

ja"sheesh, Sears called during the episode, and I still got it!"m
-- 
==============================================================================
Jennifer Mery | Please do not quote entire long articles or signatures.
Austin, Texas | guppy@wixer.cactus.org
==============================================================================
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld,alt.religion.kibology,alt.folklore.urban
From: tom@ulysses.att.com (Tom Smith)
Subject: Re: 15 city tour?
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:52:09 GMT
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

In article <By02v3.46A@world.std.com>, kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry) writes:
|> In article <Bxu0HE.A9x@csugrad.cs.vt.edu> crvich@csugrad.cs.vt.edu (Ernest Crvich) writes:
|> >   Don't underestimate the power of the kibosh!!!
                                            ^^^^
|> Is it true that the word 'kibosh' derives from the same source as the
|> word 'posh'?

Looks like kibo's grep pulled up an unexpected word!

Tom Smith
tom@ulysses.att.com				"Hold these pies."
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld,alt.religion.kibology,alt.folklore.urban
From: nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson)
Subject: Re: 15 city tour?
Organization: Clarkson University, Potsdam NY
	<LOWRY.92Nov16125853@rotor.watson.ibm.com>
	<Bxu0HE.A9x@csugrad.cs.vt.edu> <By02v3.46A@world.std.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 03:50:27 GMT

In article <By02v3.46A@world.std.com> kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry) writes:

   Incidentally, there is no such word as 'gullible' in Webster's.

BZZZT!  Wrong!  It *used* to be there, but they took it out.  No
dictionary published since 1980 has contained the word ``gullible''.

--
--russ <nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> I'm proud to be a humble Quaker.
Peace is not the absence of war.  Peace is the presence of a system for
resolving conflicts before war becomes necessary.  War never creates peace.
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: eshneken@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Edward A Shnekendorf)
Subject: Re: AMEX commercial
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 19:14:21 GMT

bm562@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Richard L. Trionfo) writes:


>   I was in a bar, and I saw Jerry in a commercial for American
>Express.  I did not hear the sound, but it was on WWOR (Ch 9 in
>NY) and it had Jerry and a fishbowl.  If anyone has seen this 
>commercial, could you post what he said.  I would assume that
>this is a national ad.
>                 Thanks, 
>                 Rich
>  

They also had the commercial on NBC during Saturday Night Live - I too
didn't hear what he said - something funny I'm sure.

>"The windshield wipers go 'whoosh, whoosh, whoosh"

Ed.

Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: madera@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu (Gangster)
Subject: Re: So who won the bet?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 22:49:13 GMT

gsroka@leland.Stanford.EDU (Gregory Sroka) writes:

>So, did Jerry or George "I got hand" Costanza win the money?
>Everyone was finally sleeping soundly there at the end! ;)

>This show's topic has to be a historic sitcom first!
>The one and only point of the whole show was the safest
>sex a single person can have.. with even mentioning the m-word.

Two things:

1)  I nearly died when Kramer placed his money down and proclaimed "I'm out."

2)  Was Jerry's continuing question, "Are you the *master* of your domain"
    a reference to "the m-word"?

--
Felix "The Gangster of Love" Madera 		 madera@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu
============================================================================
"They say, `Don't be afraid of flying...you'll go when it's your time...';
 what if we're up there when it's the pilot's time...?" - Robin Harris
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: jeremy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (jeremy.l.radosh)
Subject: Re: NY inside humour
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 01:04:08 GMT


	Forgive me, VI got away from me!!!!.  What follows is the
	  corrected version of the post.    sorry.....  

>OK Don, here it goes...
>
>1. The Chinese Delivery Boy/Bike Accident
>	I used to live on the upper-west side of NYC.  We had 18 chinese
>	restaurants in the neighborhood (from 96th street to 110th St 
>	(right by Tom's Restaurant)).  It was virtually impossible to
>	cross the street around dinner time without dancing around these
>	delivery boys.  I'm talking about 5 deliveryboys per block, going
>	the wrong way with arms full of chinese food, and rushing to
>	beat the competition !!
>
>	When Elaine got hit by the deliveryboy, it was funny.  For myself,
>	I enjoyed the humor of the situation, AND was able to visualize
>	the situation from past experience.  I don't think too many 
>	other cities have the kind of chinese delivery boy traffic NYC has.  
>
>2.  Jerry and the subway
>	You cannot deny that the NYC subway is unique.  Of course, so are
>	the Wash. DC Metro and the San Fran. Trollies.  Seinfeld is set in
>	NYC and the subway is used more than once.  The portrayal of the
>	subway is fairly accurate, but slightly bent for comic effect.  
>
>	By knowing what the comic parody is based on, the parody itself is
>	enhanced.  By way of an example, consider watching an impressionist.
>	He does James Cagney, Humphry Bogart and then Frank Simonsons.  The
>	Frank Simonsons impression might be excellent, and even funny, but
>	if you don't know on what it's based, it loses something.  So too
>	the Subway.  It's not that you don't get the individual jokes, or
>	even the ironic situations, it's just that you are lacking a point
>	of reference.  (actually, you probably have a point of reference,
>	I guess that I mean I have a more accurate one :-) )
>
>...I'm debating going on with more, but really I feel that there is a common
>thread developing in my thoughts.  What it boils down to for me is
>this:  people have different reactions to seeing things/places/characters 
>on TV (or anywhere else) after having experienced them firsthand. It's not
>just specific things (like the guy who has been selling CDs/tapes outside
>of Tom's Restaurant for 10+ years, in this week's episode), but also the
>"real" feeling of the settings/situations.  The show rings true, and we love
>it.
>
>Finally, I do hope that specific examples of NYism will not become a regular
>feature in alt.tv.seinfeld.  This could turn this group into another 
>alt.tv.simpsons!!!
>
>Enjoy,
>Jeremy


-- 
  (\_/)          " Love to eat them mousies,
  |* *|              Mousie's what I love to eat.
  \>Y</            Bite they little heads off...
   `U'               Nibble on they tiny feet."       B.Kliban `75
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: lowry@watson.ibm.com (Andy Lowry)
Subject: Re: kramer`s income
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:42:48 GMT
Distribution: alt
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In article <1992Nov15.4692.556@dosgate> "alan kennedy" <alan.kennedy@canrem.com> writes:
 > ->john@skylinx.sa.com (John Vecchio) writes:
 > 
 > ->Where does Kramer get his money from?
 > 
 > This is a good question! I never really thought about it. For some reason 
 > "disability assistance" comes to mind. 
 > 
 > We know George (Biff), is looking for work. Elaine is employed and Jerry 
 > seems to make a VERY good living from comedy (as past discussions have 
 > pointed out). Kramer has good luck with the occasional horse, but does he 
 > have a job? And the frightening question is... what does/would he do?

Keep in mind that Kramer manages to live very frugally, given that he
seems to get all his food, reading material, etc. from Jerry.
--
Andy Lowry, lowry@watson.ibm.com, (914) 784-7925
IBM Research, P.O. Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY  10598
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: meyer@dbsun.uucp (Don Meyer)
Subject: Re: NY inside humour
Organization: BioMerieux-Vitek, St. Louis Mo.
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 16:56:31 GMT

Hmm.  The chinese food delivery joke was funny, but I _was_ unaware of
the humorous volume of delivery people that you mention! :-)

Not sure that adds to the joke for me, although it does sound as though
just showing this scene (or a Jerry-George-Elaine dialogue about it)
would be funny in and of itself.

Perhaps we need to class bits as "NY-Specific, Big-City-Specific and
Universal".  Sidenote: since someone in another thread didn't know that
the last episode was about masturbation, perhaps Universal is not
truly possible... ;-)

Don
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
meyer%dbsun.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu        |||     I am at two with nature.
Opinions expressed are personal.         |||       -- Woody Allen
From: colin@ucs.ubc.ca (Colin Joe)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
Subject: Re: 18-Nov-92 show!!!!
Date: 20 Nov 1992 07:45:18 GMT
Organization: University Computing Services, UBC, Canada
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: swiss.ucs.ubc.ca

In article <1992Nov19.205822.3434@mdd.comm.mot.com> wu@mdd.comm.mot.com (Philip Wu) writes:
>
>my favorite lines:
>
>I come home to find my son treating his body like AN AMUSEMENT PARK!!
>
>A GLAMOUR magazine??
>
>
The one that slayed me was:

I thought you'd last until NEXT spring.

GREAT episode this week.  

cj

BTW, I think that Jerry and George split $250 between them and called
it a 'tie'.  ;-)

Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: ortega@cactus.org (Paul Ortega)
Subject: Re: 11/18/92 episode...One of the funniest 30 min of TV ever...
Organization: Capital Area Central Texas UNIX Society, Austin, Tx
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 07:51:19 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.021006.19598@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> ingraffi@tramp.Colorado.EDU (INGRAFFIA EDMOND J) writes:
>The subject says it all....
>
>I've never cracked ribs like that during the show...and during the
>COMMERCIALS! My house was roaring so loud, we forgot to pause the VCR
>during the break.      
>
>"The Queen is dead?" 

Don't forget:

"Glamour?"

"But, are you the master of your domain?"

"Those are MY socks!"

"I'm out...."



-- 
Paul Ortega			|  "Would you believe two cops
2015 Cedar Bend Dr., #1105      |   in a rowboat?" - Maxwell Smart 
Austin, TX 78758		|_________________________________
(512) 832-9197			ortega@cactus.org
From: vaughan@fe744.cc.purdue.edu (jake vaughan)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
Subject: Re: Episode guide
Date: 19 Nov 92 16:10:05 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Purdue University

In article <Bxy8GE.65u@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> rhino@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Lothar of the Hill People) writes:
>This seems to be a popular request, but could someone please send me the most recent episode guide......Please!

I would like to request one also.  Thanks

vaughanj@sage.cc.purdue.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: lowry@watson.ibm.com (Andy Lowry)
Subject: Re: Kramer's Job?
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:06:24 GMT
Distribution: alt
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In article <80v18lb@rpi.edu> wiseb@fomalhaut.cs.rpi.edu (Bowden Wise) writes:
 > Anyone else have any ideas for what Kramer would be good at?

Well, he certainly seemed to be typing pretty fast when he got his bit
part as Murphy Brown's secretary.  I can't say how accurate it was...
--
Andy Lowry, lowry@watson.ibm.com, (914) 784-7925
IBM Research, P.O. Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY  10598
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: anish@pearl.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Anish Bhimani)
Subject: Where does Jerry live? (was Re: So who won the bet?)
Organization: Bellcore, Piscataway, New Jersey
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 14:55:44 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.131225.13745@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>, jeremy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (jeremy.l.radosh) writes:
|> In article <1992Nov19.121207.21658@leland.Stanford.EDU> gsroka@leland.Stanford.EDU (Gregory Sroka) writes:
|> 
|> 	[ stuff deleted ]

|> But just to keep the ball rolling, here's a question.  Who thinks Jerry lives
|> on the upper west side, and who thinks he lives on the upper east side?  Or
|> perhaps the question should just read, where does Jerry live.  There are
|> certainly many clues given in the show.  He lives near a diner (Tom's is used,
|> but we can assume that it isn't really Tom's, so it isn't really 112th St, is
|> it?) that looks like an upper-westside diner.  We know that he lives uptown,
|> cuz that is the direction Elain and John-John took the cab.  The reason he
|> may be an upper east sider is that he has money, and the apartment building
|> he lives in looks more east-side like.
|> 
|> Any opinions?

This may be a stretch, but in "Mad About You" last week, we found out that Paul
actually held the lease to Kramer's apartment, since he lived there while he was
in school. If I remember right, Paul went to NYU. If I went to NYU and lived
uptown, odds are it would be because:

a) I couldn't afford a place on the East side
b) It would be an easier subway commute (I think - #1 line??) down to NYU


Also, at the end of the episode, Paul asks Kramer in passing about "That guy
Jerry who used to live across the hall". This would tell me that Jerry has lived
there for a while, even in his pre-standup days, and that the place is more likely to be on the West side.

Besides which, I like the West side better :-).

*******************************************************************************
**									     **
** Anish Bhimani                //'And they looked back and forth, from pig  **
** Bellcore                     // to man, man to pig, and no one could tell **
** RRC-1J214                    // the difference.'                          **
** 908/699-5571                 // George Orwell - "Animal Farm"             **
** 									     **
** If the Democrats can win the White House, why can't the Browns win the    **
** Super Bowl?								     **
** 									     **
*******************************************************************************
From: nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
Subject: Re: "I'm out."
Keywords: Kramer, contest, 50 seconds
Date: 21 Nov 92 21:33:23 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: HMS

In article <1eknueINN1db@bigboote.WPI.EDU> firenza@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Timothy Mark Collins) writes:
>
>out of the contest.  It was a bit over 50 seconds.  I remember some people 
>asking how long it was.  Well, there you have it.
>
>firenza
>
53 seconds to be exact. No contest,Kramer's the master of backstroke 
roulette.

-Mark
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: rbalko@attmail.com ()
Subject: Re: The "New York Thing"
Organization: N/A
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:12:10 GMT

In article <BxvIGL.7G4@news.cso.uiuc.edu> CROSSD@scorpion.ag.uiuc.edu (David Cross) writes:
>
 		.
		.
		.
>
>"It's a New York thing".  How does being from New York state differ from 
>being from anywhere else? :) :)
>
No, no, no. New York CITY. You see, people from New York State 
don't understand this NYC humor either.  As a matter of fact,
eople from Brooklyn, Queen's, (the) Bronx, and Staten Island (too)
don't understand because it really a MANHATTAN thing.

>
>Insert a :) wherever you might have been offended.

	Absolutely!
>
>David Cross

Gotta go, Matisse at MOMA and all that...
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: jeremy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (jeremy.l.radosh)
Subject: Re: So who won the bet?
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 13:12:25 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.121207.21658@leland.Stanford.EDU> gsroka@leland.Stanford.EDU (Gregory Sroka) writes:

	[ stuff deleted ]

>This show's topic has to be a historic sitcom first!
>The one and only point of the whole show was the safest
>sex a single person can have.. with even mentioning the m-word.
>
	What I found exceptional about this episode was;
	 1> the subject matter itself (especially after the recent 
	    papal rewrite of the catechism, and

	   2> the fact that Kramer actually leaves the set, jerks off,
	   and then returns, all while the scene continues.
>
>Or it's just an inside NYC thing. 
>(Couldn't resist).
>
>Did anyone keep score on the buzzer flames?
>Poor guy really got hammered by us. I hope he didn't
>run away - maybe just wised up a little.
>
>Greg Sroka

Greg, NY bashing is as popular outside NYC as New Jersey bashing is inside
NYC.  The nice thing about having lived in NYC is that your sensitivity
is lowered to such things as these flamers.

But just to keep the ball rolling, here's a question.  Who thinks Jerry lives
on the upper west side, and who thinks he lives on the upper east side?  Or
perhaps the question should just read, where does Jerry live.  There are
certainly many clues given in the show.  He lives near a diner (Tom's is used,
but we can assume that it isn't really Tom's, so it isn't really 112th St, is
it?) that looks like an upper-westside diner.  We know that he lives uptown,
cuz that is the direction Elain and John-John took the cab.  The reason he
may be an upper east sider is that he has money, and the apartment building
he lives in looks more east-side like.

Any opinions?

Jeremy
-- 
  (\_/)          " Love to eat them mousies,
  |* *|              Mousie's what I love to eat.
  \>Y</            Bite they little heads off...
   `U'               Nibble on they tiny feet."       B.Kliban `75
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: moric00@DMI.USherb.CA (Chris)
Subject: Seinfeld : Two thumbs up!!!
Organization: Double My Income (DMI)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 13:23:18 GMT

Wow, I knew the show was great, but this turn a page in sitcom history!
They dealth (sp?) with the subject in a way no other show could have
done. By the way, for the NY people, this was not a NYC thing! :-)


					Chris.

P.S. Jerry Seinfeld will appear in the Barbara Walters Special Tuesday
at 9:30 EST.
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: Greg Clow <ecurrent@zooid.guild.org>
Subject: Shameless Snapple plugs
X-To: DR. JAZZ
Organization: The Zoo of Ids
Newsgroup: alt.tv.seinfeld
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:17:00 GMT

v133kdq8@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (DR. JAZZ) writes:

>Good day good people!
>Is it just me, or were they BLATANTLY plugging Snapple beverages on last
>night's (Nov.11) program?  Every time the refrigerator was opened, it was
>offered. 


Athough I missed the epsiode, I would guess that this is probably similar 
to the references to Yoo-Hoo and Drake's Coffee Cake that appeared in 
earlier episodes.  All three of these products are sort of "traditions" in 
NYC, but (except for maybe Yoo-Hoo) aren't that well known outside of the 
NYC area.  Personally, I'd never heard of Drake's until the Seinfeld 
episode that had references to it, and it wasn't until a friend who'd been 
to NYC pointed out to me the popularity of Drake's in the city that I 
finally got the joke.  Same thing with Snapple - it just so happens that I 
was in NYC two weeks ago and saw Snapple drinks all over the place, but if 
that wasn't the case, the joke would be totally lost on me.

On a related note: as a souvenir of my visit to NYC, I brought an office 
mate and fellow Seinfeld fanatic a bottle of Yoo-Hoo and a Drake's Coffee 
Cake.  No-one else in the office got it, but he was practically ROFL.


Oh, yes, and for those who've never tried it: Snapple iced tea is 
wonderful.  I should've brought some back to Canada...


Greg



--- WinQwk 2.0 a#0
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Monday, 23 Nov 1992 14:53:15 CST
From: William H Temps III <U55533@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
Subject: Re: Kramer loses; NYCentrism
Distribution: usa
 <1992Nov21.221250.9062@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>

In article <1992Nov21.221250.9062@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>, jeremy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com
(jeremy.l.radosh) says:
>
>In article <92326.134412U55533@uicvm.uic.edu> William H Temps III
><U55533@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:
>        [deletions...]
>>   One thing I didn't like about the show was the voyeurism:  George
>>watching the sponge-bath, and everyone watching the nude woman across
>>the street.  On the show, it was funny; in real life, it would be an
>>unjustifiable violation of privacy.
>
>        In NYC, privacy is a relative term.  One assumes that, if your
>        window is uncovered, someone is watching.  Public places (like
>        hospitals, subways, etc.) are open game.  In reaction to this
>        fact, most NYers have developed the ability to either not care
>        or to protect themselves (through attitude or action). Just FYI.
>
Oh, sure, if I stand in front of my window--naked or not--I figure
there's a good chance someone's going to see me.  Even so, sometimes I
forget and I suspect there are people who have never made the
connection.  And even when I don't go out of my way to hide, I think
it would be rude for someone to watch (though undoubtedly there are
people who deliberately expose & exhibit themselves).  Personally, I've
never had such a clear opportunity, so I don't know how I'd react.

What really gets me is cases like the one in Florida, in which someone
wanted to sue their neighbor for indecency in their own living room,
and videotaped them for evidence.  The indecency case never made it to
court; I don't know whether there was a countersuit for violation of
privacy.

>        'A stranger is just a friend you haven't met yet.'
... or an enemy (I've never met Crazy Joe, for example).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
What do I have to say that's worth saying more than once?
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: bassler@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (bassler ryan p)
Subject: Re: Updated episode guide
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 05:49:51 GMT

Please someone respond yes or no...is there an updated guide I need one!!
Maintenant!!
Please forgive my impatience...
Stuck in Champaign

Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld
From: gregde@microsoft.com (Greg Demichillie)
Subject: Re: 11/18/92 episode...One of the funniest 30 min of TV ever...
Date: 22 Nov 92 23:29:52 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation
Distribution: usa


I have a two year old son and one of his favorite songs his "Wheels
on the Bus."  I don't think I can explain to him why Daddy can't
stop laughing when he starts singing it anymore.


-Greg
-- 
Greg DeMichillie          
gregde@microsoft.com      -- All opinions are mine, not Microsoft's -- 
Newsgroups: alt.tv.seinfeld