From: mikeh@starnine.com (Mike Haas)
Subject: Re: CBM Announces Price Cuts on A4000/A1200
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 05:07:51 GMT
Organization: StarNine Technologies, Inc.

In article <1jireiINNt6i@uwm.edu> gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Gregory R Block) writes:
>Matthew Simmons (zarthac@bradley.edu) wrote:

Amiga's kick ass over IBM.
Color Macs turn monochrome when you put 'em beside an Amiga.
32-bit ram is a good thing.
Ain't it a shame my 300 isn't AGA?
Somebody... anybody... beat up MB.

(.advocacy requirement fufilled...)

>: (goddamn Arkansas hick, activist wife, eco-freak veep, censorship bitch veep's
>: wife, a first kid who looks like my dog, AND A CAT AS FIRST PET! what's the
>: world coming to?)
>
>Probably it's destruction, but then again, I listen to too much Nine
>Inch Nails.  I happen to think that Arkansas hick will be GOOD for
>this country,

Like you said... you listen to too much...


>I think his activist wife is teriffic, because in being
>an "activist", she believes that everyone makes a difference, everyone
>can change the system.  "eco-freak"?

What the hell does that mean?  That's just leftist psycho-babble.
The same no-substance kind of crap that is rampent in this
administration.

It's all symbolism.  Try to find the substance.


>Daily we allow our planet turn
>to shit, daily we watch as corporations like Rockwell fuck our
>environment with their nuclear facilities, and you're worried about an
>"eco-freak"?

This is just false... hype dreamed up by the left to make American
business appear evil.

And yes, I worry about "eco-freaks" who can cause tremendous of amounts
of valuable resources ($$$ and time) to be wasted on this
"save the environment" fantasy.  I worry about placing undo restraints
on companies like Rockwell, lessening thier profits, increasing the
cost of goods and services, contributing to layoffs.  I worry very
much about the liberal agenda.

We couldn't destroy the environment if we tried.  One volcano
spews more pollutants into the environments than all of industry
ever has.


>Better that we get the last president, a do-nothing
>mistake, 

Rallied the world as never before in history and freed not only
Kuwait, but was the driving force in the stabilization of the
Gulf and insurance of the free flow of oil.  Oversaw the
downfall of the Soviet Union, lifting that veil of nuclear
destruction.

No, he wasn't the most dynamic president, but didn't do too
bad considering the uncooperative, confrontational Congress
he had to work with.  And hardly a "do nothing" president.

>out of office and prevent him from allowing corporations to
>break laws just because they've got money to push around.  

Balderdash.  For the next 4 years, though, you will be privvy
to some real expert pandering to special interest groups.

>His wife's
>out of the censorship busiess, and has even defended the rights of
>others AGAINST censorhip groups

Hillary HERSELF was cencored during the campaign!  Where the hell
was she in the last 4 months?  That happened because of her
stated anti-motherhood comments... she became a liability so
they just kept her out of sight. As did all the far-left.
Now they want their payback.


>, and better that we have a cat as a
>first pet rather than a republican president with less intellect than
>the "first pet".

Better to have another Democrat whose main interest is
looking for some "second pussy", eh?

The man is a liar... he and Gore.  The economy (as we now know)
is not "the worst in 50 years".

A media that was superglued to the left and the unconventional
antics of a 3 party race are the ONLY reasons Bill Clinton won.
He only took 40% of the popular vote and has no "charter" to
do anything for the mainstream American.


>
>In my humble opinion, of course.

Yeah, I could tell.