HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: trump@leland.Stanford.EDU (Michael Jason Lewis)
Subject: _Toys_ - a most excellent movie
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 13:04:12 GMT

Okay, I'm not exactly a regular r.a.m. reader, but sometimes you gotta brag
a little.

My roommate and I finagled our way into the world premiere of _Toys_ this past
evening in San Francisco for the bargain price of $20 (they had some no-shows.
Can you believe it?)

I'll skip the details of how we got in, got to meet Robin and LL Cool J and
get their signatures, etc. for now.  If anyone really wants to know, make it
known and I shall explain how lucky we were--it's a pretty good story, but a
long one and it's 5:00 AM here.

Anyway.  It is a wonderful movie.  This WILL win the Set Design Oscar, or I 
will be VERY annoyed.  The sets and props are absolutely gorgeous.  You've seen
some of them in the ads, and the others are as good, if not better.

Does anyone know where this was filmed?  The fields are beautiful.

Acting review:  (my uneducated opinions, mind you)

Robin Williams:  Need you ask?  He's great.  Not as manic as in _Aladdin_ or
some of his older stuff (_Good Morning,ietnam_ or his standup workrk) but still
really funny, of course, and they let him go wild occasionally (the deviled egg
scene you've probably seen in the ads is classic, as are his jacket and his
meeting with Robin Wright).  Wow.

Michael Gambon (the general):  I liked him.  He goes insane very well.  Not
incredible, but very good.  He fits his role well.

Joan Cusack (Robin's sister)She does what she has to, plus a little more 
when the movie focuses on her.  She's given very good lines.  And her
expressions are priceless when she's confused.

Robin Wright (the love interest):  My least favorite, although she is very
pretty.  Nothing great, and she doesn't seem to get into the movie as much as
the other characters do.

LL Cool J (the general's son):  MUCH better than I'd expected.  As we arrived
at the theater, he was getting out of his limo and had a quote for the press--
something about how many other rappers were portraying gangsters and such and
he didn't want to perpetuate the stereotype and give the children another mean
role model.  He has one great scene (at lunch) and many very good ones.  


I should also add, before I forget, that the soundtrack is a) really weird and
b) really, really good.  I am going to get it tomorrow if it's out.

If anyone needs to know anything from the credits, I have a full list (down to
the set medic).

Wow.

- Mike Lewis
trump@leland.stanford.edu
(still exhilarated--it was an INCREDIBLE evening)
From: dd00@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (DARIUSH DERAKHSHANI)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Daniel Day Lewis, Anyone?
Date: 17 Dec 92 03:00:41 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <168BEE736.ARL00SJB@UNCCVM.UNCC.EDU>, ARL00SJB@UNCCVM.UNCC.EDU writes
:
>Just wondering if there's anyone else who was *very* entranced with DDL
>in _Last of the Mohicans_, as my best friend and I were when we saw it?
>I immediately went out and bought _My Left Foot_, which was *nothing*
>like _LOTM_, but in which I saw why it was that Daniel got his Oscar.
>And I *loved* that great piece that Libby Whatshername did on Daniel
>in _Premier_ magazine (it was either the last one or the one before).
>VERY funny!
>
>--Jean
>
I happen to Daniel Day Lewis in _My Left Foot_, and a little known film
entitled _Evergreen, New Jersey_, a very odd movie in which he plays a dentist
on a quest.  BUT I aboslutely hated _Last of the Mohicans_ for it's writing,
direction, and acting (to some degree).  I think DDL could've come up with
MUCH better acting than he did in Mohicans.  Horrid movie!
-- 

Surrealincerely Yours,

          ====)------------------- Dariush

                                        "Whatever."
                        "Life is just an annoying side effect of sex."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mgrimes@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Michael Grimes)
Subject: Black Holes of Cinema
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:40:43 GMT

This may be a controversial or flame-baiting topic, but it relates to the 
"overrated" thread.  Black holes are cinema are people with no talent who keep 
making movies!

    Nominees:
Andrew McCarthy        Major black hole
Molly Ringwold
Julia Roberts
Dolph Lundgren
Keanu Reeves !! Major black hole! Can he walk and chew gum as anyone other than
                 Ted or Bill ?!?
Demi Moore
Bruce Willis !!  Major
Jim Belushi
Patrick Swayze Major major black hole!!!!
Tom Selleck !  Major bh
Meg Tilly!!   inactive lately, thank god!
Jean-Claude Van Damme !
Sylvester Stallone   (enough Rocky and Rambo black holes!!)


  Any more nominees......?
From: gc3@jcnpc.cmhnet.org (George Cifrancis)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Gene Siskel and Saturday Night Fever
Date: 18 Dec 92 23:14:51 GMT
Organization: Homebrew Virtual Reality Labs
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

barrus@cod.nosc.mil wrote:
:
: I just read a clip in the newspaper that quotes Gene Siskel when asked
: "If stuck on a deserted island, what movie would you like to have to
: keep you company."  He responded (and this is paraphrased as I don't have
: the article with me) by saying that he would choose "Saturday Night Fever"
: He thought it was one of his favorite movies and he saw it something like
: 17 times in a period of around 3 weeks
:
: I tell you, if I didn't already have zero respect for his reviews,
: this comment surely removes any doubt.  And I have even less respect for
: Eberts reviews.  (And I dutifully apologise to any "Fever" fans out there.)

Roger Ebert had told us on CompuServe that Gene even bought the suit that
John Travolta wore in SNF.  Roger also mentioned that Gene had to have
the crotch taken in a bit on the pants.  (hee hee!)

I dunno, I don't care for Gene but I agree alot with Roger's reviews. However
I am not as critical as he is.

George C.
From: corleyj@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley )
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Of Mice and Men
Date: 18 Dec 92 03:02:12 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson

In article <2299@hsdndev.UUCP> nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder) writes:
>In article <1992Dec17.010130.11468@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mmidboe@nyx.cs.du.edu (digital saint) writes:
>>
>>     I haven't seen any mention of "Of Mice and Men" here. Did this movie
>>just not reach many places? It is without a doubt the best movie I have
>>seen this year. It surpasses A Few Good Men, Dracula, Sneakers and several
>>others that I have seen. Does anyone know of anything else that Gary
>
>

Absolutely right.  If "Of Mice And Men" doesn't win a jillion awards, it
just goes to show that something is majorly wrong with Hollywood today.


>
>The movies to watch for at the Oscar time are : Scent of A Woman,Hoffa,Malcolm X,
>Lorenzo's Oil and Chaplin.
>
In comparison to "Of Mice and Men", respectively: haven't seen, haven't seen,
Steinbeck kicks ass, Steinbeck kicks ass.

Yours,
	Jason
From: sde0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (SCOTT DAVID EHLERS)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Millers Crossing
Date: 18 Dec 92 06:05:56 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

If you have two dollars, rent it.  Not just a gangster movie.
-- 
 
 
           "Come, dogs, we'll see who will walk away,
              and who will be food for the crows"
                                                -Conan, the Avenger
From: arnold@pyramid.unr.edu (Bruce M Arnold)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Good 1st time, not second
Date: 11 Dec 92 22:20:54 GMT
Organization: University of Nevada, Reno  Department of Computer Science

In article <1992Dec11.024157.3451@Virginia.EDU> rrb2x@Virginia.EDU (Richard Ramiaz Banks) writes:
>
>	Did anyone think that "Robinhood: prince of thieves"
>sucked or was it just me?  How can you take a movie seriously
>if killing people is a joke?  Anyways, Kevin Costners English
>accent was great!  It was so thick that I could see right
>through it.
>
>	Rikilla the Hun is ruler of northern China.

Hell yes, I'm not sure why most of my friends thought is was great.. I was
WAITING so bad for this thing to e over with.. I couldn't believe it..
Costner just sleepwalked through the ENTIRE role (probably because he just
came off the set of Dances).

I didn't like this at all.. I this Christian Slater did an excellent job,
but that's about it, and Ms. Masterantonio (sp) didn't impress me all that
much either..

Bruce..

--
arnold@cs.unr.edu  			:	Bruce M. Arnold
arnold@pyramid.unr.edu			:	Box 13854
					:	Reno, Nevada  89507
-> "'RUCE"				:	U.S.A.
					:__________________________
The University of Nevada - Reno
___________________________________________________________________>
Yes, There really is another University of Nevada, and we
were here first!  -> (Bruce Arnold speaking to cousin from Ohio)

No, I haven't taken GMBL-101 yet! -> (Bruce Arnold to same cousin)
From: su0bufs@sunlab1.bath.ac.uk (Bath University Film Society)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: HELP NEEDED - URGENT
Date: 17 Dec 92 19:38:40 GMT
Organization: Students' Union, University of Bath, UK


	I need to get hold of reviews from rec.arts.movies.review
	from as far back as they go.

	Can anyone tell me where I can pull them from, if possible.
	Or if there is a mail server for them I can use.

	Any help will be highly appreciated.

	Please E-mail me, thank you.  

	Dave


-- 
  |          ___   _ _  ___  __  <      			     |
  |  ()()    I__}  I I  |_  (_    >     su0bufs@sunlab1.bath.uk.ac    |
  |  [  ]=   I__}  \_/  |   __)  <     Bath University Film Society  |
  |  ~~~~		       	  >			             |
From: cal@gsbux1.uchicago.edu (Cal Lott)
Subject: Re: Best foreign films, by country
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 03:13:13 GMT

rrb2x@Virginia.EDU (Richard Ramiaz Banks) writes:

>	Salut!  Ah! c'est bon de parler a quelqu'un qui peut
>ecrire francais (canadien)!  J'ai une question, connais-tu
>quelqu'un s'appelle (spl) Jennifer Jan Bryce au College de
>Queens?  S'il vous plait!  M'aidez!
>
>
>	Rikilla the Hun etait ici.
>
>
>						Merci...mon ami

	Is it just me, or does it seem a little weird when someone
who calls themself "Rikilla the Hun" can very politely inquire
about a person they know at another college -- in French!?!

	8-)

				Scratching my head,
				(and re-evaluating my stereotypes,)

				-Cal
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cal Lott          "Oh, I see-- I thought 'no' meant 'spoon'!" --Dan
Email me, baby!   cal@gsbux1.uchicago.edu   cjl1@midway.uchicago.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Subject: Re: What is Molly Ringwald doing
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:56:32 GMT
Keywords: molly ringwald

In article <Bz922E.B82@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk> climiepd@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Delbert ( Peter Climie )) writes:
>gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Dec13.004359.17244@cs.mcgill.ca> jerry@cs.mcgill.ca (Gerald (Jerry) KUCH) writes:
>>>In article <1992Dec9.231625.16292@cbnewse.cb.att.com> gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart) writes:
>>>>In article <Bz05FJ.7uz@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, anderson@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu (Chris Anderson) writes:
>>>>> 
>>>>> What is Molly Ringwald doing these days?  Last I heard, she had
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Just hanging out.  Watching Roseanne right now.
>>>
>>>Why the sudden interest in Molly Ringworm?
>>>
>>Excuse me, Jerry, but it was not "sudden", and, as I'm sure you'll 
>>agree, I think you owe an apology to Molly.
>
>Does Molly have Ringworm? What is Andrew McCarthy doing ?

Apologizing.

Hope this helps.

GM(a-t-t-s)S
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.reviews
From: blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu (Brian L. Johnson)
Subject: REVIEW: CANDYMAN
Reply-To: blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu (Brian L. Johnson)
Organization: ?
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 14:01:26 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Summary: r.a.m.r. #01640
Keywords: author=K.Johnson

                                 CANDYMAN
                       A film review by Ken Johnson
                        Copyright 1992 Ken Johnson

145 min., R, Horror, 1992
Director: Bernard Rose
Cast: Virginia Madsen, Tony Todd, Xander Berkely, Kasi Lemmons,
      Vanessa Williams, Gilbert Lewis

     Virginia Madsen and Vanessa Williams are doing a thesis on folk
lore.  They find one tale about Candyman.  Candyman was a black man back
in the 1600s (?) who had an influential father.   He went to the best
schools, and became a painter.  He was called on to paint a portrait of
one man's virginal daughter, and the painter and the daughter fall in
love.  When the father finds out that the girl is pregnant, he has
Candyman killed by a group of men.  First they cut off one of his hands
with a rusty saw then smear him with honey and let bees sting him to
death.  The folklore says that when you say Candyman five times (into a
bathroom mirror?) he will come and kill you with the hook that has
been nailed to where his stump is.  Madsen and Williams find out that
several killings have been going on in the projects, and Candyman is
blamed.  The two decide to investigate, and Madsen finds out that
Candyman, Tony Todd, might really exist.

     CANDYMAN is based on a short story (I don't remember the title) by
Clive Barker.  Clive Barker didn't write the screenplay for the movie.
CANDYMAN is one of the best horror films to be released to the theaters
this year (but I expect that DRACULA will beat it).  I highly recommend
that you see this film, and don't wait for the video to be released.  On
a scale of zero to five, I give CANDYMAN a five.  CANDYMAN is rated R
for brief female nudity, graphic violence, adult situations, and
explicit language.

     The special effects for this film are great.  The gore is very well
done, without being overly disgusting.  The story is well written and
kept my attention throughout the film.  The script is written such that
the actors don't end up with moronic lines.  The sets are well done and
add a spooky atmosphere to the film.

     The actors (and actresses) all do a great job.  Virginia Madsen
(THE HOT SPOT, CREATOR) is excellent in the main role, as the girl who
may be either losing her mind, or seeing a real demon.  Tony Todd
(NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD, 1990 version) is great as the antagonist of
the film.  He makes a perfect demon, who is taking over Madsen's life.
Vanessa Williams gives a good performance as  Madsen's best friend.

--------
Ken Johnson
blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.reviews
From: blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu (Brian L. Johnson)
Subject: REVIEW: BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA
Reply-To: blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu (Brian L. Johnson)
Organization: ?
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 14:02:05 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Summary: r.a.m.r. #01641
Keywords: author=K.Johnson

                           BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA
                       A film review by Ken Johnson
                        Copyright 1992 Ken Johnson

130 min., R, Horror/Drama, 1992
Director: Francis Ford Coppola
Cast:  Gary Oldman, Winona Ryder, Anthony Hopkins, Keanu Reeves,
       Richard E. Grant, Cary Elwes, Bill Campbell, Sadie Frost,
       Tom Waits

     BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA appears to be a true adaptation of Bram
Stoker's novel.  Keanu Reeves is sent to Transylvania to close a
real estate deal with Count Dracula, Gary Oldman.  Oldman, unknown to
Reeves, is an undead bloodsucker.  Oldman is interested in Reeve's
girlfriend Winona Ryder, and travels to London to get her.  Oldman is
hunted by slightly nutty doctor Anthony Hopkins.

     DRACULA, despite a few technical mistakes, is a very good film.
I feel that it is worth the admission price and well worth going to see
before it leaves the theaters.  On a scale of zero to five, I give
BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA a four.  DRACULA is rated R for female nudity,
graphic violence, and adult situations.

     The film is well written and it held my attention throughout.  I
read the book DRACULA many years ago, so I am not that familiar with
the way the book goes, but from what I could remember, the film seems to
follow the novel.  I was surprised to see that DRACULA is rather
"arty" in many places.  I feel that at least hose of you who tend to
enjoy "art" films might want to go to a matinee of BRAM STOKER'S
DRACULA.   I enjoyed the effect this had on the film.

     The acting in this film was very well done.  Gary Oldman did a
great job as the undead bloodsucker.  He was very convincing in
his role and brings life to the film.  Keanu Reeves (BILL AND TED'S
EXCELLENT ADVENTURE, POINT BREAK, BABES IN TOYLAND [1986 television
film]) is an interesting choice as an actor to portray Jonathan
Harker.  I wouldn't have chosen him as this character, but he does a
great job.  He is on the screen considerably for the first half of the
film, then disappears for the second half.  Winona Ryder (NIGHT ON
EARTH, 1969) is excellent as Reeves' fiancee.  I feel that she is the
major attraction in this film.  Ryder is on the screen the most, I
believe.  Anthony Hopkins gives an average performance as Van
Helsing, the vampire killer.  He neither hurt, nor helped the film.

     The sets that are used for the film are, for the most part, great.
The one part that I really didn't like was the train ride.  I felt that
that looked too unrealistic and cheap.  The interior of the castle was
especially well done, I feel.  I think that the special effects are very
well done.  I liked the look of the 1950s horror films that DRACULA
has.  One of those that I enjoyed the most was the bleeding cross in the
beginning of the film.

--------
Ken Johnson
blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.reviews
From: blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu (Brian L. Johnson)
Subject: REVIEW: PROOF
Reply-To: blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu (Brian L. Johnson)
Organization: ?
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 13:59:55 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Summary: r.a.m.r. #01639
Keywords: author=K.Johnson

                                   PROOF
                       A film review by Ken Johnson
                        Copyright 1992 Ken Johnson

95 min., R, Drama, 1992
Director: Jacelyn Moorhouse
Cast: Hugo Weaving, Genevieve Picot, Russell Crowe

     Hugo Weaving is a blind man who doesn't seem to trust anyone.  He
takes photos of what is around him as proof that what is there exists.
He doesn't trust his housekeeper Genevieve Picot, who likes him very
much.  Weaving finds Russell Crowe, who he trusts, to describe his
photos to him.

     PROOF is done by House and Moorhouse Films and is distributed by
Fine Line Features (which is a division of New Line Cinema).  Although
the film's description sounds strange, and initially to me not
interesting, I found PROOF to be a very good film, although I don't
think that it will appeal to everybody.  However, if it comes to your
area, I suggest trying it.  Later this month, PROOF is going to be
released on video.  I feel it is worth seeing.  On a scale of zero to
five, I give PROOF a four.  PROOF is rated R for female nudity, adult
situations, and explicit language.

     The actors all did a good job.  Hugo Weaving was very convincing as
a blind person.  Genevieve Picot was very good as the housekeeper.
Russell Crowe was excellent as the young adult who is befriended by
Weaving.  I don't think that there were any actors in the film that I
felt were miscast.  The film had an interesting idea, which worked well;
however, I wouldn't have wanted to have been the one to describe the
film to the producer!   When I heard what the film was about, I wasn't
quite sure of what to expect.  Thankfully the film was more than I
expected that it could be.

     The script for the film was well written.  There were some places
in the film when the actors came out with some moronic lines, but not
many.  The story moves along rather well.  It did get a little boring in
some places, but those points are few and the interesting parts make up
for the slower ones.

--------
Ken Johnson
blj@mithrandir.cs.unh.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.reviews
From: d-yang@cs.columbia.edu (David Yang)
Subject: Re: Name this Deanna Durbin film
Organization: Columbia University Department of Computer Science
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 20:08:14 GMT

Hmm... I was pretty sure the Deanna Durbin/Charles Laughton film
was called "It Started With Eve", rather than "Because of Him"--
were there 2 titles, or have I just confused titles?

David Yang
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jmemon@shearson.com (Janine Memon)
Subject: Re: Most Underrated/Overrated  Actor/Actress
Organization: Lehman Brothers, NY
Distribution: rec
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:15:38 GMT

In article <AKNOWLES.92Dec16132319@expert.expert.com> aknowles@expert.expert.com (Anne Knowles) writes:
>How about overrated, too?
>
>Actor: Most Underated -- Ed Harris
>       Most Overated -- Kevin Costner
>
>Actress: Most Underated -- Linda Hunt
>         Most Overated -- Can't think of one right now but sure I will

          ^^^^^^^^^^^^ --  Julia Roberts


			Janine
--
Janine N. Memon				| All views expressed here are my own  
Lehman Bros, Inc.			| and should not be confused with those 
Amex Tower, World Financial Center	| of my employer.
New York, N.Y.				| email address jmemon@shearson.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: ps70awg@rs1.tcs.tulane.edu (mel rupinski)
Subject: Top Five Movies (by category) IMHO!
Nntp-Posting-Host-[nntpd-28940]: rs1.tcs.tulane.edu
Summary: Lot's o' films 
Organization: Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 18:50:51 GMT


Here is my list of the top five movies of all time, sorted by category
(there's just too many to choose from. . .)  All of the choices are
MHO, of course.


             Drama                         Sci-fi
             ^^^^^                         ^^^^^^
  1. Citizen Kane                   1. Star Wars
  2. A Clockwork Orange    	    2. Alien
  3. Taxi Driver	            3. Close Encounters of the 3rd Kind
  4. Raging Bull	            4. Blade Runner
  5. Cinema Paradiso		    5. The Abyss (even w/the hokey ending)

            Comedy                         Misc*
            ^^^^^^                         ^^^^
  1. King of Hearts                 1. Gothic
  2. Dr. Strangelove                2. Drugstore Cowboy
  3. Monty Python's Holy Grail	    3. Mystery Train
  4. The Princess Bride             4. Down by Law
  5. Ghostbusters                   5. Baghdad Cafe
				        
*These were movies I didn't know where to put, or could be put in more
than one category.

Honorable Mention (In the order I thought of them)
  1. Europa, Europa                13. Dead Ringers
  2. Blue Velvet                   14. The Hunger
  3. Indiana Jones (Trilogy)       15. Barton Fink
  4. The Big Sleep                 16. Naked Lunch
  5. Dead Again                    17. Eraserhead
  6. Double Indemnity              18. Sid & Nancy
  7. North by Northwest            19. Repo Man
  8. Gaslight                      20. Bull Durham
  9. Ordinary People               21. Psycho
 10. The Exorcist                  22. The Life of Brian
 11. One Flew Over the             23. Time Bandits
     Cuckoo's Nest                 24. Robocop I
 12. Spellbound                    25. The Terminator
                                   26. Highlander

Well, there's my list.  I could have thought of more, but then you wouldn't
want to read them, would you?

Anyway, there should have been more foreign films on this list, but I 
generally dislike subtitles -- I can't really give my full attention to
the acting, when I have to read the dialog (so sue me, I guess I'm not
a "purist").  I much prefer dubbing when it is done well.

Later,

mtr         

--
|Mel Rupinski               |"Maybe I'm here to start the unisex         | 
|Dept. of Psych. (Tulane U.)|revolution" - Sam (QL:Double Identity)      |
|ps70awg@rs1.tcs.tulane.edu |"Ouch, watch it!  Those flames are HOT!"--me|
|ps70awg@vm.tcs.tulane.edu  |When leapers do it, are they being observed?|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies