HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jbutcher@nucleus.cuc.ab.ca (Jim Butcher)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: gateway 15" monitor, vertical bar problem ?
Date: 11 Aug 92 13:45:06 MST
Organization: The Nucleus 16 Lines 403-531-9353 -CNet Amiga-

In article <1992Aug5.145204.10679@den.mmc.com>, ewh@emf780.den.mmc.com (Edward
Householder) writes:
>To: All monitor owners
>
>Problem: I have received two monitors from Gateway both of which
>display a vertical bar (looks like a shadow, or a reflection) on
>the left hand side of the screen. This problem is seen only at
>1024 x 768 resolution, not at lower resolutions.  I haven't tried
>it at 1240.
>
>Monitor: Gateway Crystal Scan 1572 fs, 15 "
>         (this is the 15" monitor upgrade)
>
>Graphics Card: ATI Ultra Graphics
>CPU: 486dx2/50
>
>Question(s):
>1. Has anyone out their experienced this phenomenon?
>2. Is this common? Do you know what the problem is? Any suggestions?
>3. Could the driver card being doing this?
>
>Responses:
>email - ewh@emf780.den.mmc.com
>
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>+ Nothing particularly intelligent, witty, or otherwise humorous to   +
>+ close with at this time.                                            +
>+                                            ed householder           +
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I have noticed something similar in my vga monitor, the reason is that when it
switches to 1024X768 mode the picture shifts to the left quite a bit for some
reason, I have to adjust the horizontal centre knob everytime i switch to
1024X768 mode. this effect looks like the shadow you were referring to it is
the picture folding back on itself.
From: seldner@hdi3sun.kfk.de (David Seldner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: How much is RAM in the States?
Date: 12 Aug 92 12:12:19 GMT
Organization: Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (Germany)

The subject lines says it. I'm thinking of getting maybe 4 MB RAM.
Can anyone tell me what price to expect?

Thanks a lot!

dave
seldner@hdi3sun.kfk.de

-------
Disclaimer: my opinions are not necessarily those of my employer
            (and vice versa)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: jpl1@Ra.MsState.Edu (John Patrick Lestrade)
Subject: Is the maxtor 213 meg a good buy at $470?
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 18:13:15 GMT

f you have had any experience with this drive, I would appreciate
your feedback.  thanks

--
John Patrick Lestrade, PhD                             jpl1@ra.msstate.edu
Department of Physics and Astronomy                    batse::lestrade  (SPAN)
Mississippi State University, MS 39762                 lestrade@msstate.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: dman@netcom.com (Dallman Ross)
Subject: Re: Parallel Cable Info Needed
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 08:21:05 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

dman@netcom.com (Dallman Ross) writes (quoting myself):
: I think parallel is no problem, but serial could be.

Well, it was kindly pointed out to me that I had that reversed.  Sorry to
mislead.  As it turns out, parallel can be problematic over longer lenths
if you're not careful or lucky; serial is no problem.

--
 __D_a l_l m a_n  _ R o_s s _ |dman@netcom.com  /or/  |"You sound like a man|
 l  \\ l\\   /l  /\\  l\\   l |dross@well.sf.ca.us    |with a rubber nose." |
 l   >)l \\ /ll /  \\ l \\  l |vox/fax: 1.510.645.1883| -- One-Lung Bill    |
 l  // l  \X ll/--- \\l  \\ l |350 Perkins St., #108  |     Remmer (deceased)
_l//______________________\\l_|Oakland,_CA__94610-3422|_____________________|_
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: jld@datascope.com (Jay L. Davis)
Subject: Re: Mag Monitors - Quality?
Organization: Datascope Corp.
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 19:40:14 GMT

In article <4385@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum) writes:
>In article <venable.101@faculty.coe.wvu.wvnet.edu> 
>venable@faculty.coe.wvu.wvnet.edu (Wallace Venable) writes:
>
>>	One day my (smaller) MAG went sssspt and blanked out.   I called, 
>>got an RMA, and they did a quick (about 7 day) turn around for about $100.
>>I think I had had it a bit over a year.
>
>I received a private email message from a user who ordered 3 17" MAGs;
>he reports that one was DOA and the others have shadowy problems unless
>he fiddles with the contrast. The more of these I hear about, the more
>I'm inclined away from MAG and toward Nanao or NEC. While $100 and 7
>days isn't unreasonable, I expect a monitor to last more than a year
>before this type of repair is necessary.
>

I bought the 17F about 2 months ago and haven't had any problems. It
is a very impressive monitor. Howevery, long term reliability is another
issue. I'll have to wait and see.

---Jay Davis



Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: kgermann@zeos.com (Ken Germann)
Subject: Re: Diamond Cards
Organization: Zeos International, Ltd. 
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 02:42:09 GMT

In article <1992Aug12.161815.17238@zeos.com> kgermann@zeos.com (Ken Germann) writes:
>Diamond is coming out with development kits for all their video cards.
>The development kits will include sample source code. Please contact
>Diamond at 1-408-736-2000 voice or 1-408-730-5750 fax. 
>
>
>The Winbench for the Speedstar 24X card is 12 and the Stealth is 8.5.
>More information will be posted later today. 

Wintach shows the cards as being relatively equal.  
-- 
	  Moderator of biz.zeos.announce and biz.zeos.general.
	
			   info@zeos.com 
Ken Germann		support@zeos.com 	Zeos International, Ltd.
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:22206 comp.arch:8956
From: co@bildsun1.mednet.gu.se (Christer Olsson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.arch
Subject: Re: Does a 487sx shut down the 486sx??
Date: 19 Aug 92 18:41:57 GMT
Reply-To: co@bildsun1.mednet.gu.se (Christer Olsson)
Organization: MedNet, University of Gothenburg

In article <IeYSMJK00Voz8Vf8ZN@andrew.cmu.edu>, ks3l+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kenton Shaver) writes:
|> Could anyone clear this up for me?
|> I read it in some magazine, but my ECE
|> friend is credulous.  Will my 487sx
|> just shut the 486sx down and take over?

I think so, because some new mothercards simulates 486sx to do 
the 487sx 486sx disabling control happy and therefore, the mothercard
only need a 487sx...
From: rc05@gte.com (Ramesh Chandak)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: SPeech recognition boards for the IBM PC
Date: 21 Aug 92 01:33:13 GMT
Organization: GTE Laboratories Incorporated, Waltham MA

are there any speaker-dependent and / or speaker-independent speech
recognition boards for the IBM PC ?  references / pointers please.  Thanx.

- Ramesh
rc05@gte.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: md@sco.COM (Michael Davidson)
Subject: Re: REQUEST:INTEL Architecture Book
Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 18:58:10 GMT


ygoland@ada.seas.ucla.edu (The Jester) writes:

>I'm looking for a book that will explain to me the basics of intel
>architecture from a programer's point of view. I.e. I want to know

Actually you want a book that describes IBM PC/AT architecture.
You should be able to find dozens of such books at oyur local
computer store - just browse through them and choose the one that
seems best for your needs.

If you *really* want to know about the architecture then you could
do worse than to get hold of a copy of the original IBM PC/AT
Technical Reference manual. You might also find a good book that
describes the PC BIOS useful - Phoenix has published books describing
both the PC and PC/AT BIOS and the PS/2 BIOS.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: brt@cse.unl.edu (Bruce Thiebauth)
Subject: Re: What's an NE2000?
Organization: University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Distribution: comp
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 02:46:35 GMT

jeff@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Jeff McAffer) writes:


>I have recently seen some ethernet cards labeled NE2000 and people
>talking about other cards as being NE2000 compatible.  This seems to
>typically be in a NetWare setting but I no one seems to really know
>what these cards are.  Can someone out there tell me what these cards
>are like.  Are the compatible with anything like the WD800x or the
>3com cards?

The NE2000 is Novell's 16bit ethernet card.  I am not sure which if any 3com
card are compatible (for the most part they are not, they require a different
ipx file to operate).  The cards can and are used on the same network, but 
require different drivers.  There are several NE1000/2000 compatible cards.
NDC makes a very good (and cheap <$100) as well as others.  It uses twisted
pair connectors (not BNC as NE2000).  The NE2000 runs about $160.  Your best
bet is to stay with the NE2000 compatibles (or the original) as they are 
cheap, fast, and easy to get support for.  The 3com products are expensive.
For the same money as 3com products, you could get a NE3200. (32 bit Novell
ethernet card appr. $400)
From: Alan_Boisclair@mindlink.bc.ca (Alan Boisclair)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Good inexpensive hand-held scanners?
Date: 19 Aug 92 09:02:19 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: world

Dear Nick,
I bought the LOGITECH SCANMAN (not the latest Grayscale version) with the
CATCHWORD program which came with it.  IT WAS A WASTE OF MONEY!!
Despite having a fast computer, getting upgrades, and even changing to the
PERCEIVE (Windows O.C.R.) program, it still doesn't perform with the highest of
speed or accuracy.
The bottom line, save the money until you can buy a flatbed scanner; I wasted
at least $450 so far just for the scanner/Catchword package.
I am disappointed with the accuracy of these programs which wastes my  time
editing to such an extent that if I abandon the program and time the whole file
myself I would be much farther ahead!
From: dcling@athena.mit.edu (Douglas C Ling)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Cyrix, IIT, AMD, or Intel for Windows3.1?
Date: 14 Aug 92 07:01:16 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Does anyone knows which of the coprocessors (387DX-20 or 387SX-20) works
best (read: improves most) with Windows 3.1? IIT advvertises that it improves
font/type manager operations. How much improvement are we talking about (in
a standard VGA-256k system with enough system memory)?

Typical applications are Word for Windows and Excel.

Doug
From: pvr@wang.com (Peter Reilley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: 3COM 3C501 vs. 3C503
Date: 12 Aug 92 13:33:52 GMT
Organization: Wang Labs, Lowell MA, USA

bsung@wspcrd.PeachtreeCityGA.ncr.com (Bruce Sung) writes:

>In article <bsrre0.lk3@wang.com> pvr@wang.com (Peter Reilley) writes:
>>ellis@nova.gmi.edu (Stew Ellis) writes:
>>
>>>What is the relationship between the two above-mentioned cards?  I have SCO
>>>Xenix 2.3.3 with TCP/IP networking software that supports a 3COM 3C501 and a
>>>friend across the country has a 3C503 that he is willing to send me.  Are
>>>the two cards similar enough that it is likely to work?
>>
>>	The two cards are different.   The 503 is faster.  The 501 cannot
>>receive back to back packets addressed to it.
>>

>We used both kinds before, 501 works o.k. with 386/16 and slower PC's. When
>used in 386/20 and faster, it either does not work, or it becomes extremely
>slow, or we has to slow down the frequency to make it to work.

	I use my 501 in my 386/33 all the time, it works fine.   You must
have bus speed problems.   You are probably trying to run the bus
too fast for the 501 card.

> One person
>in 3Com told me that 501 was designed for 8086/88's.

	Probable true.

>Other considerations are:
>PRICE -- 503 is cheaper.

	The 503 is cheaper than the 507, the 501 is no longer made.

>Driver availability -- NetWare 386 3.11's workstation services diskette does
>	not have an OBJ file for 501. (Too old?)

	Most likely.
-- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter Reilley ..... pvr@wiis.wang.com ..... KA1LAT <<<<<<<<<<<<<
                     Well, that about says it.
From: newsman@milton.u.washington.edu (Chris Ricci)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Fax/Voice switch
Date: 17 Aug 92 19:28:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Aug17.192849.15076
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

Hi.  This is a re-re-re-post.  Yes I screwed up my first post.  I am looking
for a switch that will allow me to use a modem on the same phone line as my
regular phone calls(voice).  I didn't get any response to a question about
a voice/modem switch or the plans for one so now I'm curious if anybody 
knows whether a fax/voice switch will perform the same job.  If you have even
the slightest idea or suggestion I would appreciate it.  Thank you very much!

Chris
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:22066 comp.sys.ibm.pc:427
From: pechter@ocpt.ccur.com (Bill Pechter)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: VLSI 386sx-25 Motherboard Time of day clock
Keywords: clock fast help
Date: 18 Aug 92 03:38:00 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Organization: Concurrent Computer Corp.,Information Services


After changing disk controllers (Perstor 16-FN ARLL controller) and adding
another 4 meg of memory to go to 8mb I've noticed my Time of Day clock 
running twice as fast as it should.

During the process of adding the memory I lost the setups for this AMI
BIOS for this VLSI/AMD386sx-25 7-16 bit slot motherboard.  The docs
disappeared - so I can't figure anything that the setups could do
to cause this.  Any suggestions?

Can clock speed setups in the bios (the AMI lets you set the clock
divisors and stuff) cause this?  This sure screws up my BBS timestamps
and news info.  Last time I saw this was a PDP11 with two DL11-w line 
clocks.

I thought the Battery-backed up clock ran off it's own oscillator
in order to keep time with the system off.

The whole thing is driving me crazy.  Please respond via mail so I don't
lose the response in the ibm-pc volume. 


-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Bill Pechter, N2RDI           | The postman always pings twice.
        Concurrent Computer Corp.     | pechter@ocpt.ccur.com
        2 Crescent Place, Oceanport, NJ 07757 - Tel:908-870-4780 
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:22444 sci.electronics:14738
From: bytehead@bp1742.UUCP (Bryan Price)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,sci.electronics
Subject: Re: What is the difference between DX and SX?
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 20:29:26 EDT
Organization: Burning Point, Columbus OH  43229-5646

gerry@bluemoon.rn.com (Gerard M. Foley) writes:

> ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib) writes:
> 
> > In article <1992Aug15.185130.24702@wyvern.twuug.com> asoper@wyvern.twuug.co
> > >sehari@iastate.edu (Babak Sehari) writes:
> > >
> > >>---
> > >>What is the difference between a DX and a SX specification for 386 and
> > >>486?!

...stuff deleted...

>    I believe the 386SX has only eight data lines, in place of
> 16 in the 386DX, and 486SX has no operable mathematics coprocessor,
> while 486DX has an on-chip math floating point coprocessor
> equivalent to the 80387.

Hello Gerry! :)

The 386SX has 16 data lines, in place of the 32 data lines that the
DX has.  Also, the 386SX only has 24 address lines, whereas the 386DX
has 32 address lines, which means that the 386SX can only address 16
megs of memory, while a 386DX can address up to 4 gigs.

The 486SX is a (purposefully) damaged 486DX so that the floating
point is inoperative, the 487SX is a normal 486DX with a different
pin-out that is to be used in the feature slot.  With the 487SX, you
can toss the 486SX, as it totally replaces it.

The 486DX2 is a 486DX with a clock multiplier builtin to make
internal machinations occur twice as fast as they normally would. 
This gives you an increase in performance without an increase in the
cost of the support circuitry.  This chip is fully pin-compatible and
replaces any existing 486DX.  There fore, a company can design a
33MHZ 486DX system, and with the change of a chip (and a heat sink,
the chip get's extremely hot) can then sell it as a 66MHZ system. 
Currently, the only OverDrive chips as Intel calls them are for DX
systems, so trying to run a 486DX2 in a machine that has a 486SX,
just ain't going to work.  Intel obviously has the technology to do
it, it's a matter of whether they will or not.

ObPeeve: I personally am a little fed up with these various "options"
that Intel is trying to pander to the public.  The 486SX broke a lot
of programs that assumed that once they were running on a 486, they
would have floating point.  Now, various options to not have an
internal cache, and who knows what else they'll cook up, will
probably be pawned off on the public.  They'd have done the world a
favor had they made the 386SX pin compatible with the '286.

Bryan L. Price       | [ bytehead@bp1742.UUCP ]           *Burning Magnesium*
<Why would I make    | [ {n8emr|nstr}!bluemoon!bp1742!bytehead]
my disc any laimer?> | [ Bryan.Price@p1742.f340.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG ]

All trademarks are owned by their respective owners..........................
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: elliott@est.enet.dec.com (Nathan J. Elliott -- I'd rather be flying)
Subject: help with 386MAX, SuperStor setup
Reply-To: elliott@est.enet.dec.com (Nathan J. Elliott -- I'd rather be flying)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 12:16:16 GMT


Help with 386MAX, SuperStor setup!!!!!

I need some help getting my computer to work.  I have tried several combinations in an attempt to get my computer to work using 386MAX and SuperStor.  Some combinations have left me with a locked up computer, and the others will not let me run Windows 3.1

Does anyone in here use this memory manager and the SuperStor disk compression utility?  If so, could you please post your AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS files.  

Any suggestions would be welcome.

thanks
nate
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: willmore@iastate.edu (David Willmore)
Subject: Need help with switch settings on IBM-XT mb
Summary: Need help setting up my mb.
Keywords: mb motherboard IBM XT
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 08:51:30 GMT

I have recently aquired an ancient IBM XT motherboard and I am trying to
get it setup in a system that is useable.  I have performed the 256 to
640K modification, but I don't know the switch settings to get it to
perform correctly.  This is a really basic question and I hope that
someone can just pop this off of the top of their head.  Thanks in
advance. 

--David Willmore
willmore@iastate.edu

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: zhengbin@helios.physics.utoronto.ca (Zhengbin Wang)
Subject: help with mouse problem
Organization: University of Toronto Physics/Astronomy/CITA
Distribution: comp.sys.ibmps.hardware
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 16:42:01 GMT

 I just bought a 486 and there is something wrong when I start the
machine: It take about 3 to 4 seconds for the mouse to be installed.
Any ideas? It's not big deal for the 3 seconds, but is it a indication
of something wrong with the I/O? Can I figure out the situation with
some software? 


Thanks in advances
zhengbin
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: cbb1@ra.msstate.edu (Chris B. Borchert)
Subject: Need help with generic memory card for 286
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 00:33:56 GMT

Hello.  I just got dumped with a 286 at work.  It has 1M RAM, but I
need at least 1M of extended to run Turbo C++ 3.0.  I located a 
memory card for it that I don't think anyone has ever used.  It is
truly generic:  no manufacturers name on it whatsoever.  I know little
about PC hardware, but it has 4 rows of 18 Motorola chips each. I have
it in a middle slot and am trying to hack the DIP switches to get it 
to respond.  There are 2 Grayhill DIPs labled DSW1 & DSW2.  I have no
idea whether this monster configures to AST or Intel RAM card conventions.
Can anyone please tell me some DIP switch settings to try without going
through the 2^16 possible combinations?  Is there some program I can get
to help me determine if the card works at all?

I appreciated all suggestions.

Thanks,
Chris Borchert
cbb1@ra.msstate.edu
From: jones@darth.pgh.pa.us (Davey Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: XT + CMOS?
Keywords: CMOS, XT, Hyundai
Date: 12 Aug 92 19:15:18 GMT
Organization: Darth Software, Allison Park, PA

Help!  A friend of mine has a Hyundai Super 16 TE.  Apparently it is an XT.
However, he believes it has CMOS - I think he sees the battery.  He has tried
to access it as though it were an AT:  No joy.  Question:  Does this model
Hyundai indeed have CMOS and how is it accessed?  Alternatively, is there
a number for Hyundai that might provide information?

Thanks
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:21931 sci.electronics:14418
From: newsman@milton.u.washington.edu (Chris Ricci)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,sci.electronics
Subject: Modem/Voice Switch
Date: 15 Aug 92 21:10:46 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

I know I recently saw a discussion here about a modem/voice phone switch, and   now I find myself in need of one.  Does anyone know where I could find such a   device for cheap or the plans to build one.  Thank you in advance!
From: dmillar@ocf.berkeley.edu (Derek Millar)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Problems installing new memory, hard drive
Date: 14 Aug 1992 21:05:27 GMT
Organization: U. C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: headcrash.berkeley.edu


I am replacing the old memory in my system with larger capacity SIMMs, and
I've hit a problem.

The new SIMMs don't work.

I noticed that one of the old SIMMs is different than the others.  Is a
special type needed for low memory on a PC?  If not, I assume the other
possibilities are that I didn't settle the SIMMs properly or they don't work.

How should I best test the new memory if I can get it to work?  Are
there programs available to do this?


On a completely different note, does anyone have the number of Maxtor's
Tech Support?


Thanks in advance,

Derek Millar
From: cbb1@ra.msstate.edu (Chris B. Borchert)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: What program tells HD interleave factor?
Date: 19 Aug 92 01:58:45 GMT
Organization: Mississippi State University

Can someone tell me a good program to determine the optimum interleave
factor for any HD?  I have used HDTEST 1.28 (and it works great!), but
it says it only runs on RLL drives.  I cannot find a newer version of
this program.  Are there others for MFM and IDE drives?

Thanks,
Chris Borchert
cbb1@ra.msstate.edu
From: mascot@bnr.ca (Scott Mason)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Amiga monitor with VGA ?
Keywords: amiga 1084 svga
Date: 13 Aug 92 15:29:37 GMT
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

In article <mitch.713125342@b3.ingr.com> mitch@b3.ingr.com (Mitch Walker) writes:
>
>Does anybody have any information on using the Amiga/Commodore 1084 
>monitor with my 386 as a vga monitor?  Seems like there was a 
>discussion about this some time ago.  I'm sure the pin-outs are 
>different.  Any information would be appreciated.

I have a 1080. I believe that the 1084 is the same.

The A1080 has four inputs:
  - composite
  - chroma/luma
  - digital RGB
  - analog RGB

It was intended to scan at NTSC rates; this means that it
syncs to 15kHz.

I have used this monitor to display CGA. I believe that it
should also display EGA. Each of these uses the digital RGB
inputs. VGA syncs at 32kHz and could not be used with this
monitor.

Hope this helps.

------------------------------------------------------------
#include <disclaimer.h>              Bell-Northern Research
Scott Mason                          P.O. Box 3511 Station C
Internet: mascot@bnr.ca              Ottawa, Canada, K1Y 4H7
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.arch