HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: earhard@ug.cs.dal.ca (Mark Earhard)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: How long has it been?
Date: 8 Oct 92 18:55:51 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

In article <1992Oct8.122212.8023@ac.dal.ca> brentaa@ac.dal.ca (brent, eh?) writes:
>In article <1992Oct7.143510.8398@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>, mel@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu (Meloney D Cregor) writes:
>> 
>>>I see nothing wrong with being away from romantic involvement or sex for a
>>>few years at a time.

After my last relationship, I can now emapthize with that point of view!
Sometimes you need a break, and sometimes you need a big break.  I find
it is helpful to "Me" instead of "Us".

>> While I might agree that being away from a romantic involvment for a time
>> might be a good thing, because right now the idea of a romantic involvemnt
>> sends me into a cold sweat.  

Oh, good- someone else suffers from this disorder.  And I was about to see my
doctor...

However, being away from affection and simple
>> physical contact of some sort would make me very sad. A hug, a kiss, a loving
>> caress from friends or loved ones of any sort is something I would not
>> trade for all the money in the world.
>> 
>> --
>>  Life is exactly what you make of it, always has been, always will be.

Too true (At least for yours truly :)

>Yes YES!!!. I agree wholeheartedly...
>Besides, I don't recall ever saying anything about sex!!!
>I could have been kissed by my mother for all he knew
>(although I wasn't..;-))

Oh, so it was your seester?

(I couldn't resist, and now I feel *much* better.)

[Does this mean I'm not a lurker anymore?]

Marcus.
-- 
__
Mark Earhard -      earhard@ug.cs.dal.ca -       07marcus@ac.dal.ca
Reclaimer:  GIVE ME THAT BACK THIS INSTANT!      BRING THE NOISE!
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: allisson@turing.toronto.edu (H. Allisson Roome)
Subject: Re: Ipisissimus
Organization: Net.gypsy
Date: 13 Oct 92 02:35:20 GMT


(Meloney Cregor) writes:
>(H. Allisson Roome) writes:
>> [I apologizefor not having sister and offer the banana trick with chocolate
    coating as an alternative ante(auntie)]
>
>Ah, I've still got you Allisson.  I've got three seesters!

Seesters we doan need no steenkin' seesters - besides the seesters that
I know areenunse.  I don't think that the 'men' want to play poker eith
nuns...

Allisson-- 
allisson@turing.toronto.                            H. Allisson Roome
"Far more marvelous is the truth than any artist of the past imagined.  Why
do poets of the present not speak of it?" - Richard Feynman
Xref: sparky soc.singles:27252 alt.sex:32332 talk.abortion:41343
From: jdavidso@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.sex,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: More Questions we all wanted to ask
Date: 8 Oct 1992 16:57:53 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
Distribution: world
Reply-To: jdavidso@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: jd-next.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

In article <1992Oct7.222827.12534@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux,  
just drieux) writes:
> 
> Ok, EVERY STOP WHAT YOU ARE DOING:
> 
> "Do You Know where YOUR Sir Richard is right now?"
> 


Well, she said she would bring it back when she finished with it, but it's  
been days.....and every time I call, I get some really wierd moaning and  
groaning after the receiver is picked up.??????????????

--
************************************************************************
 the Lost Cause                       jdavidso@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
(hardwaire guy extraordinaire)       MACTech,NeXTtech; NeXTmail accepted
                      "Everything is relative."
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Can MOTOS's be friends?
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 07:03:20 GMT

In article <9210090053.AA22222@regal.cisco.com> mlb@CISCO.COM (Marcia Bednarcyk) writes:
>
>In article <1992Oct3.220737.6937@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>|> However, there is a small but vocal subset of humanit that tends to feel
>|> that any feelings of attraction they may have for another somehow impose
>|> an obligation on that other--that if A happens to get turned on thinking
>|> about B then B has a 'moral obligation' to see to it that A is 
>|> satisfied--and people who hold this particular attitude are unlikely to
>|> be very good at being friends with MOTAS they find attractive.
>
>And part of this subset also believes that any attraction that they have
>for a member of the opposite sex causes an obligation in themselves to act
>upon it. This also makes for a difficult time trying to be friends, when if
>your friend happens to catch your eye for a moment, you feel that you have
>to do something about it.

Good point--that must eliminate an awfully large portion of the number of
potential friends one can have; I have to admit that I've had the occasional
(even frequent) carnal thought about friends of mine and acting on them all
would not only make my life far more complicated, it probably wouldn't leave
me much free time either.

I wonder why it should be so much harder to weigh the consequences in such
situations than it is when, say, deciding whether or not to buy a 
particularly enticing piece of stereo equipment?

Trygve   (Actually, I think I've been doing a lot better at resisting
          lustful impulses than at resisting buying more stereo stuff.)
From: neilfp@astro.ocis.temple.edu (Neil F. Palumbo)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Philadelphia rules!!!
Date: 17 Oct 92 01:30:30 GMT
Organization: Temple University
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

How about Horsham/Ambler area?
From: jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JOSEPH ALOYSIUS MCVEIGH)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Last/Mohicans - "Not" based on a book?
Date: 7 Oct 92 17:52:21 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University


In response to my opinion as follows:
>>The ultimate date movie now in theaters.."The Last of the Mohicans."
>>
>>Lots of action, great scenery, a hero and a heroine, drama, good guys and bad
>>guys, redemption of a quasi-bad guy, reasonably faithful to its literary basis
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (eleanor.j.evans - Piglet) writes:
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

The operative word is "reasonably."  Sure, the dialogue changed - no one could
sell a movie with Cooperspeak intact. Sure, the romantic aspect was introduced,
but it wasn't the only focus of the movie. What I considered is that the plot
- though trimmed to make the movie shorter than nine hours - held true to
Cooper's nonstop action, that the "battle" for Fort William Henry was
historically accurate, and that the characters of Hawkeye, Uncas, Chingachgook,
and Magua were essentially intact.

Compare this adaptation to the film version of, say, "A Farewell To Arms."
That - like all films of Hemingway stuff - was reasonably unfaithful to its
literary base.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Aloysius McVeigh | I never believed in fate....Always felt, you make
   jm0i@.Lehigh.edu     | your own way, you take care of your own, and you pick
       "N.I.N.A."       | after yourself.                           - Ed Hurley
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: bmeyer@feds12.prime.com (Bob Meyer)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Balloon Boink report
Date: 8 Oct 92 18:40:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: cvbnetPr.4055
Organization: Computervision Corp.

In article <vqgpkb@lynx.unm.edu>, blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
|> 
|> A Note to anyone reading this, especially lurker types: 
|> GO TO A BOINK! ANY BOINK, THEY ARE WONDERFUL EVENTS.
|> 
|> I'll repeat it again- if you've got a chance to attend a boink, go for it.
|> It doesn't matter who you know there, you'll leave with some pleasant memories,
|> that's for sure :)
|> 

    If you sat at your terminal and read about the Boston Boink,
    If you wish you had gone to the Balloon Boink,
    I just have one thing to say to you:

      Philly Boink, Nov 20-22, 1992,
      watch this space for details

      Bob  

   ... you never forget your first boink!
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: Re: Preliminary attempt at a SS mini-FAQ
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 92 03:35:28 GMT



Thank you sir (TREEG-vah) for confusing me more than Miss Drieux does.

Ahn-DEEE.

EEG-nore-ransss (d.a.)

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: Re: The proof is in the Pooding
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 21:34:25 GMT

In article 17757@wetware.com, drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>dkeller@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dave Keller) writes:
>] atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik) writes:
>] 
>] >My biased view is that despite Victorian myths, Men are generally more
>] >prone to sentimentality than women. This is not to say that some women 
>] >cannot be more mushy than some men.
>] 
>] I agree entirely.  Women can be brutally pragmatic.  If you cannot further
>] their agenda, then you're toast - yesterday's news.
>] 
>] But with time we all learn - and get hard-hearted.  We go from starry-eyed
>] nice-guy to flaming jerk.  Which is better anyway since that is what women
>] want.
>] 
>] Quick!  Someone flame me cruelly!  I may not be a total jerk yet - I need
>] help!
>
>Dave 
>
>thank you for sharing this heart warming Emotionally
>balanced view of Modern women and their pragmatic
>approach to problem solving. I can think of no clearer
>proof of Andreas' general hypothesis that men are little
>more than a bag of sentimental drippings and emotionally
>unstable garbage.                     
                                        >drieux


The above is a true classic.
Translation for true devotees of colloquialdrieuxspeak:

SentimentalDrippingsAndIsotopicallyUnstableNinjaTurtleRadFemSurfNaziPizzaVomit?

Did I misplace a letter? :=\

Andreas.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: probst@selkirk.sfu.ca (Scott Probst)
Subject: Re: relationship gone to pot?
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 00:22:19 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.225954.20459@netcom.com> shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller) writes:
>In article <1avh43INNagm@ef2007.efhd.ford.com> bkelley@ef2007.efhd.ford.com (Brian Kelley) writes:
>>
>>In article <9680158@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> jws@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (John Schmidt) writes:
>>>Teri's advice is excellent. It's best to avoid relationships with people
>>>who have addictive personalities. Unfortunately, it may take some time for
>>
>>Help.  I think I'm addicted to driving my car on race tracks.  Does that
>>qualify as "some other self-destructive habit"?
>>
>IMHO, if you need to do that so badly that it interferes with your
>primary relationship, then yes, I think it's a self-destructive habit.
>
>I think there is a big difference between enjoying doing something, and
>being so hooked on it that one can't function normally.  I've actually
>seen people so hooked on D&D that they were flunking out of school,
>lost their SOs, and many of their friends left, too.  I view that as
>being addictive.  
>
amazing coincidence!! i've seen people so hooked on school that they were
flunking out of life, losing friends, and impossible to get any sense out of.
wow...


Scott Probst: Brain and Behaviour Laboratory, Psychology dept, SFU
              "... if that happens, of course, you will find a packet of 
              sea urchins in your mailbox. To derive full enjoyment,
              take one in each hand and squeeze."         - Dr H. S. Thompson
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: allisson@turing.toronto.edu (H. Allisson Roome)
Subject: Re: Ipisissimus
Organization: Net.Gypsy/ROM
Distribution: na
Date: 14 Oct 92 03:50:29 GMT

In article <1992Oct14.014649.631@samba.oit.unc.edu> Bathsheba.Grossman@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Bathsheba Grossman) writes:
>In article <1992Oct12.130633.28367@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>>In article <1992Oct9.202428.26419@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> allisson@turing.toronto.edu (H. Allisson Roome) writes:
>>>Sorry, I don't have any seesters (at least that I know of) but I'm
>>>willing to open with 3 pounds of bananas (and not to be outdone by Mel
>>>- I'll scrounge up the fondue pot and make chocolate fondue, dip the
>> 
>> Can you cook meat in that there pot?
>
>Flesh fondue?  There's a market nearby that sells whole filets
>mignon...yes... 

But it would be a waste of good steer to put it in a fondue pot - that's
for the piece that need tenderizing.

>hordes of raving nurds elbowing one another's breasts in
>their eagerness to plunge chunks of scarcely-expired cow, impaled on
>razor-sharp skewers, dripping with gore, into boiling oil.  Then, the
>savory condiments, the soft pillows, the well-greased orifices...yes.
>
Hey Seth - sounds like your sort of party.  So Sheba what sort of savory
condomints (I didn't know they were flavoured) did you have in mind? I'm
looking forward to this party -- can we few proud net.women handle "raving
nurds"

Allisson
-- 
allisson@turing.toronto.                            H. Allisson Roome
"Far more marvelous is the truth than any artist of the past imagined.  Why
do poets of the present not speak of it?" - Richard Feynman
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
Subject: Re: relationship gone to pot?
Organization: QQQCLC
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 23:08:23 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.225954.20459@netcom.com> shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller) writes:
>In article <1avh43INNagm@ef2007.efhd.ford.com> bkelley@ef2007.efhd.ford.com (Brian Kelley) writes:
>>Help.  I think I'm addicted to driving my car on race tracks.  Does that
>>qualify as "some other self-destructive habit"?
>>
>IMHO, if you need to do that so badly that it interferes with your
>primary relationship, then yes, I think it's a self-destructive habit.

	But suppose your car _is_ your primary relationship?

	"Let me hold your wheel"		Kayembee
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston)
Subject: Re: Open letter to Edward V. Wright
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 09:54:38 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.225855.4621@panix.com> pw@panix.com (Paul Wallich) writes:
>In article <1992Oct7.222421.6938@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>>In article <5800@news.duke.edu> diamond@acpub.duke.edu (Elizabeth Abrams) writes:
>>>Well, to half-borrow a line from 'Dangerous Liasons'- I'd *love* to do
>>>some secretarial work for you.
>...
>>Trygve    (Hope you don't mind if I tend to alternate shorthand with
>>           longhand.) 
>
>I'm so confused. I thought it was Dawn's mutant who was differently
>handed. Please somebody explain this to me.

Yes, and I'm the one with the simian crease.  Over the weekend I was talking
with a woman who was telling me about her grandson who had been born several
weeks prematurely.  I politely asked if he had been born with a lanugo, not
wanting to phrase it as "covered with fur."  (He had and still has much of it.)
After explaining the evolutionary significance, I went on to mention the
grasping reflex and the Moro reflex.  She asked if there were any other such
traits, and I then showed her the palm of my right hand and explained the
simian crease.  "Oh, you mean like this?" as she then showed me the palm of
her right hand, which had a simian crease.

-- Herb Huston
From: aaf0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Andrew Aaron Feigin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: relationship gone to pot? and race car driving?
Date: 9 Oct 92 16:07:22 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1992Oct7.230823.21396@netcom.com>, barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) wri
tes:
>In article <1992Oct7.225954.20459@netcom.com> shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller)
writes:
>>In article <1avh43INNagm@ef2007.efhd.ford.com> bkelley@ef2007.efhd.ford.com (B
rian Kelley) writes:
>>>Help.  I think I'm addicted to driving my car on race tracks.  Does that
>>>qualify as "some other self-destructive habit"?
>>>
>>IMHO, if you need to do that so badly that it interferes with your
>>primary relationship, then yes, I think it's a self-destructive habit.
>
>       But suppose your car _is_ your primary relationship?
>
>       "Let me hold your wheel"                Kayembee
>
------------------
HEY KAYEMBEE, CAN I BLOW YOUR EXHAUST PIPE???


AAF0@LEHGIH.EDU

"Moslem or Christian Mullah or Pope
Preacher or poet who was it wrote
Give any one species too much rope
And they'll fuck it up"
-Roger Waters  "Amused To Death"
-- 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: daniel@clsi.COM (Daniel Barclay)
Subject: Re: Preliminary attempt at a SS mini-FAQ
Organization: CAD Language Systems Inc.
Date: 8 Oct 92 10:32:11

Thanks for answering the Too-infrequently-asked-but-frequently-wondered-about-
acronym questions.  (TIABFWAAQ.  No, I guess not.)

Daniel
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: Qui est le plus MUSHY?
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 18:37:15 GMT



   A recent experience has compelled me to post this.

I was wondering what your thoughts were on sentimentality as a function
of gender. I don't care if you use sweeping generalizations, or you get
down dirty and specific.

My biased view is that despite Victorian myths, Men are generally more
prone to sentimentality than women. This is not to say that some women 
cannot be more mushy than some men.

What do you think/believe?

Andreas.
From: marcia@netcom.com (Marcia)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: POT AND THE RELATIONSHIP, LET THEM SMOKE!
Date: 10 Oct 92 06:39:59 GMT
Organization: The Dolphin Conspiracy, Phase II

In article <1992Oct9.155829.251447@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> aaf0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Andrew Aaron Feigin) writes:
>Well, I put my two cents in here instead of at the end of this 6 pager...
>All this about pot is nice and all, but if you all were truly people and not
>engineers you would realize that no matter what, if you fall in love with
>someone, you are not going to ask, "so do you wack the weeds???"

I like to think of myself as a person and an engineer, but be that as it may...

Yes, I would ask. And do. Because unlike a lot of others, I don't think that
falling in love is completely beyond my control, something I must be 
helpless in the face of. I may be very attracted to someone, but if the
person does something that I can't live with, I am going to call a halt to
things.
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marcia Bednarcyk                                  ADDRESSES: marcia@netcom.com
"Sweaty Snugglebunnies."                                     mlb@cisco.com
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: catcher@netcom.com (Paul W. Francisco)
Subject: Re: The Campaign for a Hate Free Oregon
Organization: Night People
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 05:50:10 GMT

In article <ldpj3lINNb2t@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> emarsh@hernes-sun.Eng.Sun.COM (Eric Marsh) writes:
>   No on 9 Campaign: The Campaign for a Hate Free Oregon
> 
>        PO Box 3343 Portland, OR 97208 (503) 2324501

Hi people...

Something I thought I'd mention here, and I hope that it is ok
with the No on 9 people...

For those who do wish to send contributions, but are wondering 
about the keeping of records, it works like this:  if you send 
$50 or more you need to include your name, address, and occupation.
Less than that only needs your name.  This is following Oregon
rules, not No on 9 rules.  So if you wanted to contribute $100
or so, and don't want it to be kept on records with your address
and such, send 2 $49.99 checks :-)

For those who are wondering, no, I don't work for the No on 9
campaign and have no affiliation with them.  But as an open-minded
Seattlite I am finding that this is affecting me, and could moreso
in the future if they come up here.  So I want to do what I can,
however little that may end up being.

I have changed the newsgroups line to only soc.singles, since you
are the people I know in the original list, but feel free to
distribute it if you wish.

As for me, the check's in the mail... :-)

-- 
Paul W. Francisco        	    In the shadow an angel cries...
catcher@netcom.com                      - Front Line Assembly
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: relationship gone to pot?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 07:10:34 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <12OCT92.15230625@verbis.waisman.wisc.edu> kingston@verbis.waisman.wisc.edu writes:
>bill has a very strong point.  One never knows when one will get involved
>with an alcoholic.  I know.  I have postponed my wedding 3 times due to
>his drinking. 
>I believe that in order not
>to "fall in love" with a dysfunctional person is to believe in yourself
>and when the other person ever treats you unfairly or rudely, leave the
>ass.  I'm talking man or woman.  You don't deserve to be abused in any
>way.  do I make any sense????

Plenty o' sense, but a question (and not to be rude, so please don't take
it that way) if you really feel this way, why have you only postponed
your wedding and not cancelled it?
r.


Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle)
Subject: Re: More Questions we all wanted to ask
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 00:14:11 GMT

>>thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:
>>>Has anubody else tried braiding theirs?

>johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>>You have three of them?  I bet you're real popular with the ladies.

Three.  Goodness.  Even Stacy Brown, he just has two.
-- 

Kiran Wagle                           <kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry)
Subject: Re: Cool .sigs  was RE: How long has it been?
Organization: QQQCLC
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 04:55:45 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.191402.10461@bsu-ucs.uucp> 01ksdavis@bsu-ucs.uucp (Rebel without a clue.) writes:
>	maybe we can get a new newsgroup alt.sigs?  Opinions?

	Yeah. If it'll keep such stupid and childish waste of bandwidth
off of real newsgroups, I'm all for it.

						Kayembee
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA (Andreas  Tovornik)
Subject: Re: Dating an older woman
Reply-To: atovorni@engr.UVic.CA
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 92 02:11:54 GMT



  Your wit and eloquence enterain us. Put a feather in your cap for the one
about the Reagans, Imelda and Pavarotti.

  Loved the line about thrashing your servant. (Due to the present state of
the economy, I've had to let my servants go...Now I drink Ginger Ale. At
least the lionskin rugs I shot in Kenya on Safari stay clean...)

See you at the next hunt, Old Bean. Say HUZZAH! to Muffy for me,

Andy.
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Dating an older woman
Date: 9 Oct 92 06:51:46 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston) writes:

>Aristotle recommended that husbands be 19 years older than their wives.
>Actually he was more specific; he suggested that men marry at the age of
>37 and women at 18.  He justified the age difference on the grounds that
>the couple would be entering their sexual decline together.

I thought that the sexual peaks were the other way around - the male's at
18, and the female's at 35.

--
Stef                           Who needs lime jello?  We had lasagna...
stef@apple.com