From: goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.fan.monty-python
Subject: Re: That's a bloody lie!!!!!
Date: 12 Nov 92 10:52:50 CST
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <1992Nov9.142331.774@blurt.oswego.edu>, la_ind03@blurt.oswego.edu writes:
> In article <1992Nov8.153308.3785@wkuvx1.bitnet>, goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
>> In article <1992Nov4.220644.747@blurt.oswego.edu>, la_ind03@blurt.oswego.edu writes:
>>> In article <1992Nov2.151605.3662@wkuvx1.bitnet>, goffgb@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
>>>> In article <5765@balrog.ctron.com>, lawrence@ctron.com (Gary St. Lawrence) writes:
>>>>> 
>>>>>  wish to protest, in the strongest possible terms, the allegation that I,
>>>>> Saint, am an egomaniac!
>>>>> While it is true that I have an ENORMOUS ego, it is also true that said
>>>>> ego is well-founded because of my superior intelligence, wisdom and a
>>>>> disproportionately large set of naughty bits (Hey Gina, interested?).
>>>> So, Saint, How big is the rest of you? and HOW BIG ARE THEY?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have been a participant in the buisness world and have never fallen out
>>>>> of a window ....
>>>>> 
>>>> Wow. Neither have I, though I have been known to bounce off walls.
>>>> 
>>>>> And by the way, that's NOT the sound of two Norwegians tussling in a 
>>>>> sleeping bag with a vole!
>>>> What is it then?
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am not an egomaniac, nor am I a Lego-maniac! And I resent the insinuation
>>>>> that I am, even though I'm not if I even thought about being so ... which
>>>>> I haven't.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let's just get this all out in the open and expose ourselves. 
>>>>> I know I have.
>>>> You seeing Madonna these days or what? I have nothing against exposing
>>>> myself. I'd probably like to, though I'd rather not do so by myself.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Saint (with 12 points? and a humidor of things)
>>>> 12 !!! I only have 10. No fair. I'm AT LEAST as attractive as you, and
>>>> a lot more flirtacious. 
>>>> 
>>>> Gina aka wench aka the beautiful curvaceous blonde wishing to be
>>>> President of a.f.m-p so she can grant you your every desire
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The hell with being president, I'll grant your every desire just for fun...
>>> Meredith aka the sleazy blonde with whipped cream on top
>> 
>> Would you rather be with a woman who can only take you to the height
>> of ecstacy or with a woman who can:
>> 	1. Take you far beyond the height of ecstacy to the point
>> 	   where you amaze even yourself.
>> 	2. Put you in power positions that could last the rest of your
>> 	   life.
>> 	3. Appoint you to top executive positions--both inside and
>> 	   outside of this newsgroup.
>> What's your choice? 
>> Are you men or boys?
>> 	(I'd ask if you were mice or men but that's an unfair
>> 	 question, and I must be fair sometimes)
>> 
>> Gina aka your loveslave in a good way
> 
> 
> Please note that two out of three points included utilizing her power as V.P. 
> I suppose it's necessary for her to be vice-president, 'cause she wasn't
> getting anywhere with her inadequate talents.  Sort of like those 70 year old
> corporation heads who use their subordinates for their own amusement...  Too
> bad everyone else isn't so amused.  She'd have to be your loveslave, because
> you wouldn't want to be hers...
'scuse me, but only 1 of the 3 even mentions this newsgroup, and it
only half mentions it. I happen to be a powerful person in my
community and therefore have the ability to get appointments for
people. and ecstacy is not so far away when you're with me.......