HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: scott@bbx.basis.com (Scott Amspoker)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Help with SY99
Date: 3 Sep 92 17:44:58 GMT
Organization: BASIS International, Ltd., Albuquerque NM USA

In article <1992Sep3.163829.6707@hpcvusn.cv.hp.com> bw@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com writes:
>I am posting this for a friend who has an SY99.  This is a snippet of a 
>message he sent me.  Any clues would be appreciated.  Thanks!
>
>  Also, if you ever come across synthesizer files on the Yamaha SY-99, I'd be
>  interested in knowing if anyone else has had some baffling problems I've had
>  with mine that Yamaha, at least on the phone, says they know nothing about.
>[problems deleted]

I've never experienced any problems with my SY99.  Sorry, I can't help.

-- 
Scott Amspoker                       |    
Basis International, Albuquerque, NM |  Too bad ignorance isn't really
                                     |  bliss.  Then it could be outlawed.
scott@bbx.basis.com                  |
From: murat@farallon.com (Murat N. Konar)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Performer/Powerbook problems
Date: 28 Aug 92 21:59:10 GMT
Followup-To: rec.music.synth
Organization: Farallon Computing

In article <29184@wissel.GBA.NYU.EDU>, dschmidt@wissel.GBA.NYU.EDU (David
S. Schmidt) wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm trying to get Performer 3.61 to work on my Powerbook 140, using an
> Opcode Professional Plus midi interface.  I'm not getting any midi output
> at all.  I know about the serial port problems on the Powerbooks, but I
> should be getting something out of it!


I used to have lots of problems with Performer 3.61 Opcodes Studio 3 MIDI
interface on my PowerBook 170.

Here's what I did:
- I use the Modem port (my printer port is often in use by AppleTalk)
- Make sure that your PowerBook is configured to use the external Modem
port
(check in the "Portable" control panel.  If you do not have an internal
modem,
you may not see the internal/external modem switch so don't worry).
- Make sure Performer is configured to listen to the Modem port.

I'm using Performer 3.64 now and haven't had as many problems as I did with

3.61.

______________________________________________________________________________
Murat N. Konar
Sound Software Engineer (NOT!)
Farallon Computing, Inc.
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth,comp.dsp,comp.sys.hp,comp.sys.sgi
From: olson@anchor.esd.sgi.com (Dave Olson)
Subject: Re: AUDIO-CD READING ? [ actually, DAT ]
Organization:  Silicon Graphics, Inc.  Mountain View, CA
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 03:21:12 GMT

In <BttoD8.IqK@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> eckert@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Toerless Eckert) writes:

| From article <1992Aug24.220034.6916@odin.corp.sgi.com>, by archer@elysium.esd.sgi.com (Archer Sully):
| > The Indigo can read and write the non-audio bits of DAT.  I'll leave
| > the implications of that to others.  
| > 
| > For the digital input, I believe (but I'm not positive) that you have to 
| > wait for an OS update to get this capability.
| > 
| >>And, when will we get similar functionality on PC class machines?
| >>
| > 
| > As soon as the DAT transport manufacturers (eg Archive) put the firmware
| > into general release.
| 
| *sigh* do you want to tell me, that not only the Toshiba CDROM
| drive used by SGI has got a special firmware, but the Archive Python
| DAT too ???

Yep.  But again, it isn't an exclusive arrangment.  Ardat is free
to sell that firmware to whomever they wish.  And the good news is
that for the DAT, the hardware was completely stock; no hardware
changes were required.

Hey, we charge more for our peripherals because we put a *lot* of
time and effort into qualifying them, including getting the features
we want.  Again, this was a case of SGI deciding we wanted the
ability (nobody else had pursued it), designed and spec'ed the
interface, and worked with Ardat to make it happen.

As with the CD-ROM, we payed no NRE on this, because we did *not*
require exclusive rights to the end result.  We figured we had
enough of a jump on everyone else with our software and hardware
that we saw no reason to try and keep the technology proprietary.
--
Let no one tell me that silence gives consent,  |   Dave Olson
because whoever is silent dissents.             |   Silicon Graphics, Inc.
    Maria Isabel Barreno                        |   olson@sgi.com
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth,rec.music.marketplace,misc.forsale
From: lei@rtsg.mot.com (Peter P. Lei)
Subject: Roland MC-50 Micro Composer sequncer for sale
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 19:59:15 GMT


*** FOR SALE ***

Roland MC-50 Micro Composer Seqencer:  $475
   8 track (16 channels each) sequencer.  Extensive editing capability.  3.5"
   MSDOS format compatible floppy drive.


This unit is in mint condition with original accessories.  Reasonable offers
will be considered.  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Lei                                           UUCP:   ...uunet!motcid!lei
Motorola, Inc.                                      Internet:  lei@rtsg.mot.com
Cellular Infrastructure Group                       Phone:     (708) 632-5654
1501 W Shure Dr, IL-27/AR-3215B 
Arlington Hts, Illinois  60004                    Standard disclaimers apply =)

Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: dpliske@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Daniel B. Pliske)
Subject: Macintosh Cybernetic Composer for Algorithmic Composition
Keywords: Macintosh, MIDI, algorithmic composition, music
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax Va.
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 00:53:38 GMT


Does anyone out there know of an FTP site where I can get a
shareware program for the Macintosh called Cybernetic Composer?
It was written by Charles Ames and Michael Domino as part of
the Kurzweil Foundation Automatic Composition Project, and is
discussed in Chapter 20 on Algorithmic Composition of Christopher
Yavelow's book "Macworld Music and Sound Bible".
 
If you know of sites or other means of obtaining this program,
please let me know.
 
Thanks.
 
========================================================================
   Dan Pliske                         Internet : dpliske@gmuvax2.gmu.edu
   George Mason University
   Fairfax, Virginia
========================================================================

Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: richardg@ssd.intel.com (Richard Griffiths)
Subject: glib for the SY77  
Organization: Supercomputer Systems Divison, Intel Corp.
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:25:40 GMT

Has anyone already modified glib to support the SY77?  I thought I'd ask before
trying to hack it myself.

Richard 
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth,comp.music,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.amiga
From: bskendig@netcom.com (Brian Kendig)
Subject: Re: Atari Falcons $799!!!!!
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 06:40:54 GMT
Organization: Starfleet Headquarters: San Francisco

In article <1992Sep1.052243.15525@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jyoung@nyx.cs.du.edu (Jeff Young) writes:
>In article <Z1V7PB8w165w@bluemoon.rn.com> troy@bluemoon.rn.com (Troy Fridley) writes:
>>when we See it I'll belive it... But then again  Who the hell wants an 
>>Atari Anyways?
>
>Many many people are using Atari all over world!  ...
>YES even in computer industry roots are found at Atari Computer company. ...
>
>So now you know..Atari is you friend.

Yeah, but nobody'd better tell Atari about 'advertising', or they
might become dangerous. ;)

>BILLIONS of people with only $799 to spend will buy new Atari Falcons
>because for price it include greatest value in our history..

Oh, sure!  Better hardware doesn't always equal sales.  If it's not
compatible with anything else out there, then nobody will buy it;
the world of PC's is a harsh one.

> Atari Falcon 030 Specifications
> -------------------------------
> ...

One of Murphy's Laws is, "If it looks too good to be true, it is."
Like the original poster said: When I see it, I'll believe it.

     << Brian >>

-- 
_/_/_/       Brian Kendig  Macintosh Jedi           Live never to be ashamed
 _/_/   Starfleet Captain  Oracle Employee         if anything you do or say
  _/  Intrepid Adventurer  Saturn SL2 Owner    is published around the world
      bskendig@netcom.com  Thoughtful Dreamer   -- even if what is published
    Princeton '92! BSE/CS  Writer/Actor/Singer                   is not true.
From: 6o25@sdf.lonestar.org (Stephen M. Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Moog/SCI questions (Devo/gary numan)
Date: 1 Sep 92 23:54:24 GMT
Organization: sdf Public Access UNIX, Dallas--unrestricted free shell access

shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally) writes:
>The Radio Shack moog was also sold by Moog but it was called the Rogue,
>not the MicroMoog. The Opus 3 was a rehashed Prodigy if I remember 
>correctly. 


how would you rate the opus 3?  I played one a bit, but the pawn shop
owner wanted me to leave...  they want $175.. a bit steep for the
sound (some was good) it made.

-- 
SdfComm/SysAdm - Stephen M. Jones        (214)436-4622
6o25@sdf.lonestar.org    ..seas.smu.edu!letni!sdf!6o25
From: defrain@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu (Paul Defrain)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Mail Order Prices
Date: 2 Sep 92 20:12:14 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network

>	A couple years back, a hardware sequencer I purchased from Sam Ash  
>had some problems.  I called them, they were so rude - they wouldn't even
>give me the company that made the sequencers phone #, let alone offer to
>repair it themselves.  They basically said, 'it's yours now and it's your
>problem.' of course in their New York accent.  I had purchased roughly
>$3000-4000 worth of gear from them up to that point.  Since - zilch.
>Purchase at your own risk.

Yes.  I too have numerous complaints concerning Sam Ash and their customer
policies/courtesy.  I continue to do business with them all the same
as I generaly know I will be getting a good price on what I order.
Just don't make any important purchases with them -- do not trust them.

For reliabile service, knowledgeable salespeople, and slightly inflated
prices, try Howard Goldman.

Paul D.
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: mikek@iex.UUCP (Mike Keilhofer)
Subject: Re: Anyone use(d) Music Quest MIDI card?
Organization: IEX Corporation
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 14:29:26 GMT

In article <gunnar.715290490@beppe> gunnar@beppe.ericsson.se (Gunnar Forsgren) writes:
>bollard@hpspkla.spk.hp.com (Lee M. Bollard) writes:
>
>>Music Quest midi cards are well-known to be the very BEST midi
>>cards available.  It's the only midi card worth buying.  Totally
>>configurable, well supported, great features.
>
>>There are several models.  The "PC-Midi Card" is the low-end model.
>>MQX-16 offers 16 channels, MQX-16S adds SMPTE, MQX-32M is a dual
>>port 32 channel w/SMPTE card.
>
>I use the PC Midi Card. No problems at all.
>It is compatible with the 'industry standard' Roland MPU-401
>MIDI card.
>
>--
>Gunnar Forsgren  Ericsson Telecom AB  email:<gunnar@beppe.ericsson.se> 
>BU Network Management Systems         phone:+46 8 7196118 fax: 7192900
>TMOS Basic System VB/ETX/TM/FR    "Included material shall in no way
>S-126 25 Stockholm, SWEDEN         be associated with the company."

I use the MQX-32M. I use one port to run keys and the other to controll
effects. I also use the SMPTE feature to stripe my 8 track tapes and
sync to MIDI using Cakewalk. The card and its software has performed
flawlessly. My only complaint is that the card did not have any labels
for the phono jacks (SMPTE in/out). But that was no big deal to figure out.

=========================================
Michael Keilhofer          
Dallas Tx
Email: [uunet!]iex!mikek or mikek@iex.com
=========================================

From: brooksp@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Peter Brooks)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 21:39:48 GMT
Subject: Re: Performer Version 4.0
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth

>/ hpcc01:rec.music.synth / bbs.forte@tsoft.sf-bay.org (Steve Salani) /  8:36 pm  Aug 29, 1992 /
> Has anyone upgraded to Performer 4.0?
Yes
> Is there a 4.1 yet?
No, at least not that I heard of.  4.01 is my version.
> Is 4.x very buggy?
Not that I've seen.  Still learning how to build consoles, but most apparant
bugs in Performer seem to be more like quirks.  :-)
> Does MOTU provide any consoles for editing synthesizers remotely?
You have to build them yourself, unless there's third-party support.  MOTU
has mentioned swome third-party vendors in their last newsletter, but I
don't know if they do this regularly.  (First got 3.61 in March.)
> (specifically I'd like to get a TG-77 editing console).
I'd like *anything* that let me edit Wavestation F/X in a Mac.
>
>--
>Steve Salani (bbs.forte@tsoft.sf-bay.org)
Pete Brooks
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: dcovell@intelhf.hf.intel.com (David Covell)
Subject: Re: WANTED: Quadraverb
Organization: Development Tools Operation, Intel Corp., Hillsboro  OR
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 20:24:39 GMT

kyle@wendy-fate.UU.NET (Kyle Jones) writes:

> > > What is the difference between the Quadraverb and the Quadraverb+ ?
> > > Thanks.
> > 
> > Apparently, the difference is $20.

>:-) The QV+ has a few more effects modes, plus a limited sampling
>capability.  The QV+ is also hissier than the plain QV.


I have the ROM upgrade chip to get QV+ features from the QV. I'll sell it to
the first $10 bidder. It adds the new QV+ effects but does not provide new  
presets which incorporate them. That's no big deal, since most of the QV presets
a-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAVID COVELL (dcovell@pcocd2.intel.com)|Wrangler of acoustic, electric, and
INTEL FOLSOM (California)              |Midi guitars, basses, synths, CAD tools
DESIGN ENGINEERING, EPG GROUP          |and assorted other techno-beasties
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: trice@bnr.ca (Tony Rice P885)
Subject: Keyboard Mag Oct cover story				 
Reply-To: trice@bnr.ca
Organization: BNR, Inc. Research Triangle Park, NC
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1992 16:54:48 GMT

Has anyone noticed the cover story on October's Keyboard
magazine?  "Has The Mac Met It's Match" about the latest
version of windows.

I think a better question is, do we care?  I've got a mac
with a bunch of MIDI software.  I am not going to put it
in the closet and go out and get a 486 just so I can be 
current with the new technology.  Anybody else out there
like me?

I am getting a bit tired of Electronic Musician and Keyboard 
Mag focusing only on the "new toy" type of reporting.  I 
would like to see more info on how to make my existing gear 
work better for me.

-- 
==========================================================
                      Tony R. Rice                      
         Systems Development Environment Support         
----------------------------------------------------------
trice@bnr.ca                        Bell-Northern Research     
mrmidi@aol.com                  Research Triangle Park, NC
----------------------------------------------------------
Opinions are my own, and do not reflect those of BNR or NT
----------------------------------------------------------
                       "Go Hokies"
==========================================================
From: gallo@almira.asel.udel.edu (Andy Gallo)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: rate this synth
Date: 27 Aug 92 14:46:33 GMT
Organization: AI duPont Institute


>   Groovy Sequential Split-8 Polyphonic Programmable Synthesizer
> You bet. Sure it's been around, but it's barely used, just like new.
>Eight rockin' analog oscillators; you can actually SPLIT THE KEYBOARD and
>play two sounds at once from different ends of the 5-full-octave keyboard
>   Kick-butt effects pedal (for sustain, filter, pitch bend...)
>		MIDI connections, Full size keys
>The only reason I'm selling it: I was always too lazy to program the darn
>	       thing. And I ain't no Beethoven anyway.
>				   
>  Would like to sell it for $200. Send me a note if yer interested.


	Anybody have info on this machine?  Age?  Street value?  Right
now I'm using a stock Casio keyboard (one of those models with the
zillions of presets, but no synth capability) and Cakewalk for the
IBM/PC.  
	I'm a novice when it comes to synths.  Any info about the
capability of this machine would be appreciated.

>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<
> Andy Gallo   | gallo@asel.udel.edu  | U. of Delaware/Applied Sci & Eng Labs <
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<
>     Come wash the nighttime clean, come grow the scorched ground green.     <
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<
From: eirikur@ranger.enet.dec.com (Eirikur Hallgrimsson)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Peter Sinfield (was .. something else entirely)
Date: 31 Aug 92 06:44:20 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


In article <9208282015.AA18650@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>, JROSSI@EAGLE.AAMRL.WPAFB.AF.MIL writes...
> 
I had forgotten PFM, but the answer that I was looking for was that he ran the
lightshow for the first King Crimson shows.

Eirikur Hallgrimsson   |    "Can I have some more aftertouch on that
eh@ranger.enet.dec.com |     snooze-alarm?"
PATHWORKS for Macintosh|
From: shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally)
Subject: Korg Polysix MIDI retrofit
Reply-To: shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 19:42:25 GMT


Korg USA no longer has the official Korg Polysix MIDI retrofit kits
available (they did 2 years ago). Anyone know where I can get one ?
Are these still available through Korg in Europe ?
From: br326@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Raphael Pungin)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Yamaha PSR-500 vs. Yamaha PSR-500M ??
Date: 3 Sep 1992 16:51:00 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: br326@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Raphael Pungin)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


sira@waffle.sns.com (Sira Vista) says:

>I've seen advertised both the Yamaha PSR-500 and the Yamaha PSR-500M.
>
>What's the difference between the two?  
>
>The only physical difference ican see is that the keyboard says PSR-500M
>instead of PSR-500.  The price difference was about $25 higher on the 500M.
>Anyone have any ideas?

   When I bought my PSR-500M the sales person told me that the difference is 
that it includes the power supply. PSR-500 does not.

-Raphael
From: tardif@montmorency.ulaval.ca (Pierre-Martin Tardif)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Composing & notation software... help me!
Date: 30 Aug 92 19:47:36 GMT
Reply-To: tardif@gel.ulaval.ca
Organization: Universite Laval

Hi !
	I bought a Roland SCC-1 card to compose music and
I wonder which software I should use ?????

	I have some information on MusicTime from PASSPORT
and that's all...  I looked in Computer Shopper and the
only advertise came from Soundware.  They were offering
Band In A Box Prof., Encore, Finale, Ballade, MusicPrinter
Plus, Musicator, The Copyist and SCORE 3.

	I really need help because I am lost in that jungle.

	Also, how do I interface my SCC-1 card with Windows 3.1 ????

Thank you a lot !

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-- 
Pierre-Martin Tardif, etudiant gradue  (email: tardif@gel.ulaval.ca)
Laboratoire de Vision et Systemes Numeriques
Universite Laval, Pavillon Adrien-Pouliot, local 00100-I, Ste-Foy, Quebec,
Canada, G1K 7P4         (418-656-2131, ext 4848)
From: jseboldt@pnet51.orb.mn.org (John Seboldt)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: MIDI Pedalboard
Date: 31 Aug 92 18:25:01 GMT
Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN.

Is this a full 2-1/2 octave organ pedalboard, or the little one-octave stubs
like spinet organs?

: John Seboldt...Minneapolis, MN...As a ham, K0JD...as a human,       :
: right-brained yet right-handed...as a musician, techie yet creative :
:   UUCP: {crash, tcnet, petrus, quest}!orbit!pnet51!jseboldt         :
:   ARPA: crash!orbit!pnet51!jseboldt@nosc.mil                        :
:   INET: jseboldt@pnet51.orb.mn.org                                  :
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: sherman@ecadsr.enet.dec.com (My name is...)
Subject: Re:      D-70 Question?
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 16:29:15 GMT


In article <SYNTH-L%92083108285792@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU>,         "Sean F. Jepson" <SJEPSON@ERS.BITNET> writes...
>I have been wanting to purchase a D-70 for some time now but have not
>had the money to buy one. This past Saturday I visited a local music store
>and the salesman told me that they no longer carry the keyboard and that it
>will be discontinued by Roland.  He said he could special order the keyboard
>but it would cost more since it was not bought in bulk quantity.  The price
>he quoted was $1895.  I believe that the going rate was around $1650 or less

Wow.  Discontinued by not coming down in price.  $1650 was about what I paid
for mine nearly two years ago.  My understanding is that (all hype and specs
aside) the JV80 is the (cost-reduced?) replacement for the D70.  If I were in
your shoes, I'd look at the JV80 or JV30 and see if that will fit your needs.
I wouldn't trade my D70, though ...

Steve
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
From: Myles Wakeham <mylesw@amgen.com>
Subject: Re: Info needed on Mackie mixer
Organization: Amgen Inc.
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.0
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 19:58:18 GMT

>Last week there was a post regarding mixers made by Mackie.  Also there 
>was a post regarding a phase problem with the mixer.  Anyone who has the 
>post, would you please e-mail it to me directly or repost it please.
>
>Trying to prevent a big mistake...
>
>Christopher Clement

Mackie host a support forum on MUSO-BBS.  You can dial in and 
correspond directly with their representatives.  Its on (818) 884-6799.

Myles
From: nick@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Subject: Re: Parting with old synths
Date: 1 Sep 92 12:50:05 GMT
Organization: Naff Green Shorts Dance Co.
In-reply-to: nsw@cbnewsm.cb.att.com's message of 1 Sep 92 02:42:00 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.024200.9487@cbnewsm.cb.att.com> nsw@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (Neil Weinstock) writes:

   So what do folks out there do who turn over a lot of instruments all the
   time?

Erm, some of the time...

   Do you redo old sequences or just retire them?

If I want to keep the material "current" (i.e. as sequence data rather than
a finished DAT) then I rescore the sequences, programming up similar sounds.

   Do you worry about
   losing certain staple sounds?

"Staple" sounds are not a problem; it's the unusual, distinctive ones. I'm
still sad I lost the VFX since its clarity and punch are irreplaceable...

  Or just keep all your old instrumnets, period?

My general approach (when possible) is to retire keyboards in favour of
rackmounts. Hell, you never need to sell rackmounts; they occupy zero(*)
space after all, and the trade value is so low there's no point shifting
them out.

Nick.

(*) Well, almost zero.
--
  Nick Rothwell, LFCS, Edinburgh | "Say, how many contemporary dancers are
               nick@dcs.ed.ac.uk |     there in this bar?"
CASSIEL Contemporary Music/Dance | "Dunno; count the Dr. Martens and
     cassiel@cix.compulink.co.uk |     divide by two..."
From: cfoley@Bonnie.ICS.UCI.EDU (Ciaran Foley)
Subject: Using the MAC 100 Portable for sequencing....
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth
Date: 25 Aug 92 23:01:45 GMT

Will I have trouble running most sequencing software on this beast if
I decide to buy it? 16 mhz, 20 meg HD, ext. floppy, 2 meg (4 meg later) ram,
68000? I need an answer quickly, as I have a terrific offer on one!

Thank you!
Ciaran

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California Software, Inc.  | cfoley@bonnie.uci.ics.edu |  (714)729-4230 Office
2121 E. Pacific Coast Hwy  | eaiu131@orion.oac.edu     |  (714)644-6277 Fax
Suite # 220                | Internet                  |  (714)729-4222 Main
Corona Del Mar, Ca 92625   |                           |  (714)830-3579 Home
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------