HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: casper@fwi.uva.nl (Casper H.S. Dik)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.large
Subject: Re: What do you do when you run out of ip ports?
Keywords: socket, ports, networking
Date: 30 Sep 92 13:03:24 GMT
Organization: FWI, University of Amsterdam

kevink@grant.ncd.com (Kevin Kelleher) writes:

>I have recently started running out of reserved ports used
>by rsh (ports < 1023).

>Has anyone found a solution for this problem?

>I have run into this on both a Sun running SunOS 4.1.2
>and a Solbourne running OS/MP 4.1A.1

There is no way to increase the reserved port space. The only
thing you can do is cut back on rsh-type connections.

There are several consumers of reserved ports:

    outgoing rlogin, one per session, use telnet instead.
    (all ingoing rlogins share the same address)

    ingoing/outgoing rsh (use resp 1 and 2 reserved sockets)
    These should not be long lived. Are people by any chance starting
    x programs are such with 'rsh <host> "xcommand &"' ?
    This holds on to several reserved ports without using them.
    Use one of the x program (xon, xrsh) that closes all the socket end
    points and releases the connection.


Other? Analyse the connections you have and see how you can
reduce the number of needed reserved ports.

Casper
-- 
						|	Casper H.S. Dik
						|	casper@fwi.uva.nl
Newsgroups: comp.unix.large
From: davidb@is.morgan.com (David Birnbaum)
Subject: Problem Tracking Systems
Organization: Morgan Stanley & Company
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 07:18:42 GMT

Some time ago, I sent out mail asking for a problem tracking and
management system.  Here's three responses that covered the packages
of interest.  Thanks to everyone who send me mail.

From: scoggin@ee.udel.edu (John K. Scoggin, Jr.)

  We have a not-quite-totally-free Help Desk Management System.  The
  software is called HDMS and was written here at Delmarva.  The
  source and PostScript docs are available under pub/hdms on
  ftp.uu.net.  The only catch is that it requires the Unify RDBMS and
  Accell 4GL from Unify Corporation.

  It is currently based upon Accell and the Unify IDS product, but we
  are almost done converting it to Unify 2000, their flagship DBMS
  product.  User interface is currently character-based, but an
  X/Motif version is next on our agenda.  We already have one Motif
  app running.  Image integration of things like circuit diagrams are
  in the offing, as well.

From: pliuskon@intellistor.com (Saul Pliuskonis)

  We are in the process of evaluating a few Problem Tracking Systems,
  one is called ction Request System from Remedy Corp. (405) 903-5211,
  The other is called Apriori, from Answer, I don't have the number
  handy for them though.

  The Action Request System is relatively new, very flexible, and it
  has a nice X-based interface, and it is priced very reasonably.

From flash@sunvice.East.Sun.COM Tue Jun 23 22:03:56 1992

  Summary: EMERYVILLE, CA June 15, 1992 -- Scopus Technology, Inc.
  announced ProTEAM, client-server groupware to automate the
  operations of software companies and software-centered
  organizations. ProTEAM integrates the entire
  organizationQengineering, quality assurance, technical support,
  sales and marketingQall share a Sybase SQLserver-based database of
  product and customer information. ProTEAM modules now available
  include SupportTEAM for call tracking and customer support,
  QualityTEAM for bug tracking and quality control and ViewTEAM for
  graphical analysis of information. ProTEAM turns product and
  customer data into Renterprise memory, an information asset that all
  departments use to improve customer service and product quality.
  Companies can configure all aspects of ProTEAM to meet their
  specific requirements, without custom programming. ProTEAM
  applications run on any client that supports X-Windows.  The client
  licenses cost less than $3000 per user in a typical configuration.
  Call Scopus at 510-428-0500.

--
David Birnbaum                   + "Be liberal, but not totally uncontrolled."
Morgan Stanley & Company, Inc.   |
New York City, NY  USA           |  Just remember...computers don't write bad
davidb@is.morgan.com             +  code...people do.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.misc
From: johno@boas.cogsci.uiuc.edu (John Oneill)
Subject: dir tree  program
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 01:55:57 GMT

This may not be the place but...

I am looking for a dir tree program that will traverse the directory
tree of a system and put this info into some sort of neet form.
I have just taken a sysadmin job and would like to know where
what, is. Without doing it myself.

I hope someone can help.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
      John O'Neill				University of Illinois
      e-mail johno@lees.cogsci.uiuc.edu		at Urbana-Champaign
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Things do not change; we change.
                                       -- Henry David Thoreau
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky comp.unix.sys5.misc:10 alt.sources:2133
From: nrp@csug3.cs.reading.ac.uk ("Educated bags" Neilski)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.misc,alt.sources
Subject: Re: dir tree program
Date: 29 Sep 92 08:52:33 GMT
Reply-To: nrp@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk
Followup-To: alt.sources.d
Organization: University of Reading

johno@boas.cogsci.uiuc.edu (John Oneill) writes:

>This may not be the place but...

Not really ... (crossposted to alt.sources, followups to alt.sources.d)

>I am looking for a dir tree program that will traverse the directory
>tree of a system and put this info into some sort of neet form.
>I have just taken a sysadmin job and would like to know where
>what, is. Without doing it myself.

This appeared in UnixWorld a couple of years ago.


#!/bin/sh
# @(#) dtree - prints a directory tree

dir=${1:-.}
(cd $dir ; pwd)
find $dir -type d -print | sort -f |
sed -e "s,^$1,," -e "/^$/d" -e \
"s,[^/]*/\([^/]*\)$,\`-----\1," -e "s,[^/]*/, |     ,g"


-- neilski

-- 
nrp@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk  \--------------------------------------------------
----------------------------\ Woke up this morning, out of bed I leaped,
Banged my head on the ceiling and I went straight back to sleep...   -- Dylan
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.misc
From: eder@D012S638.sniap.mchp.sni.de (Johannes Eder bei SNI-AP251)
Subject: Re: File Manager for Unix-based Machines
Organization: Siemens-Nixdorf AG
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 10:37:55 GMT

In article <1992Sep24.173912.17722@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jam3n@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (John A. Mcqueen) writes:
>Greetings,
>
>I'm not all that sure that this post belongs here but what the hey,
>here it goes.
>
>Is there a disk management program available for unix-based machines?.
>My Father runs a Prime 325 EXL and needs a file manager, like DOS
>Manager or DOS-Shell, that can tag files, group them, move them
>among various directories, etc.  
>
>Does such a program exist? If so, what is it and where can
>I find it?
>
>If this is not the right group for this post, please let me
>know where I can post it.

There are such programs. One that is free available is UTREE. It is
comparable in its functionality and look and feel to the DOS-program
XTREE. Source code is available ported to various UNIX machines. The program
is from Peter Klingenbiel - mail address :   klin@iat.uni-paderborn.de

The program should be available via FTP from : 
		ftp.uni-paderborn.de   (131.234.2.32)

I use the program on a SVR4-machine. It works fine. i like it quite
much. Hope this helps.

Joh. Eder

Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.misc
From: asoper@wyvern.twuug.com (Aubrey Soper)
Subject: Re: File Manager for Unix-based Machines
Organization: Tidewater UNIX Users Group
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 06:08:53 GMT

jam3n@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (John A. Mcqueen) writes:

>Greetings,

>I'm not all that sure that this post belongs here but what the hey,
>here it goes.

>Is there a disk management program available for unix-based machines?.
>My Father runs a Prime 325 EXL and needs a file manager, like DOS
>Manager or DOS-Shell, that can tag files, group them, move them
>among various directories, etc.  

>Does such a program exist? If so, what is it and where can
>I find it?

>If this is not the right group for this post, please let me
>know where I can post it.

>Thanx in advance,

>John A. McQueen
>University of Virginia
>Center for Public Service

>jam3n@poe.acc.Virginia.edu

try utree, an outstanding public domain offering.
-- 

aubrey
---                              ;
><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>'  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>  ><>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.misc,comp.unix.sysv386
From: ellis@nova.gmi.edu (Stew Ellis)
Subject: Binaries of GNU gcc for SYSVR4.0.3
Keywords: gcc for SVR4
Organization: GMI Engineering&Management Institute, Flint, MI
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 22:05:14 GMT

I keep trying to compile gcc 1.42 on Intel SYSVR4.0.3, received from Intel
about the time they were turning everything over to ISC.  Should be the same
as first versions shipped by ISC before they were bought by Sun.  I suspect
the computer may have some memory problems, but am not sure.  I have
configed gcc 1.42 for SYSVR4 and made all of the changes pointed to in the
Makefile.  I started out in the sys5 universe ( /bin and /usr/bin before
/usr/ucb in PATH ) and got a fatal internal compiler error.  I changed to
the ucb universe and hung the entire computer.  No panic, no crash image
saving, just hung.  I tried twice more with the bsd universe and got another
fatal error and another hang (again no panic, it hung in the window system
instead of going back to the console screen).  I am stubborn, so I am trying
again as I post this, this time in the sys5 universe again.  I would like
any hints or tricks.  Even better would be an installable tar of the gcc
binaries and whatever else is needed to get it going.

I looked on dell2.dell.com, thinking maybe the tar there would incorporate
Dell's porting mods, but it seems to be a stock 1.40 in the sources/v2.1
directory. (wasn't 2.1 Dell's 4.0.3?).

As always, any help will be appreciated.


--
--                                                        ___________________
  R.Stewart(Stew) Ellis, Assoc.Prof., (Off)313-762-9765  /   _____  ______ 
  Humanities & Social Science,  GMI Eng.& Mgmt. Inst.   /        / /  /  / /
  Flint, MI 48504      ellis@nova.gmi.edu              /________/ /  /  / /
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.misc,comp.unix.sysv386
From: ellis@nova.gmi.edu (Stew Ellis)
Subject: Re: Binaries of GNU gcc for SYSVR4.0.3
Keywords: gcc for SVR4
Organization: GMI Engineering&Management Institute, Flint, MI
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 12:50:25 GMT

ellis@nova.gmi.edu (Stew Ellis) ((that's me)) writes:

>I keep trying to compile gcc 1.42 on Intel SYSVR4.0.3, received from Intel
>about the time they were turning everything over to ISC.  Should be the same
>as first versions shipped by ISC before they were bought by Sun.  I suspect
>the computer may have some memory problems, but am not sure.  I have
>configed gcc 1.42 for SYSVR4 and made all of the changes pointed to in the
>Makefile.  I started out in the sys5 universe ( /bin and /usr/bin before
>/usr/ucb in PATH ) and got a fatal internal compiler error.  I changed to
>the ucb universe and hung the entire computer.  No panic, no crash image
>saving, just hung.  I tried twice more with the bsd universe and got another
>fatal error and another hang (again no panic, it hung in the window system
>instead of going back to the console screen).  I am stubborn, so I am trying
>again as I post this, this time in the sys5 universe again.  I would like
>any hints or tricks.  Even better would be an installable tar of the gcc
>binaries and whatever else is needed to get it going.

>I looked on dell2.dell.com, thinking maybe the tar there would incorporate
>Dell's porting mods, but it seems to be a stock 1.40 in the sources/v2.1
>directory. (wasn't 2.1 Dell's 4.0.3?).

>As always, any help will be appreciated.


>--
>--                                                        ___________________
>  R.Stewart(Stew) Ellis, Assoc.Prof., (Off)313-762-9765  /   _____  ______ 
>  Humanities & Social Science,  GMI Eng.& Mgmt. Inst.   /        / /  /  / /
>  Flint, MI 48504      ellis@nova.gmi.edu              /________/ /  /  / /

I finally was able to get the panic message by compiling from the console
rather than from the window system.  I had thought that panics would kick me
back to the console, but I was wrong.  The message is something about MB
parity error at unknown address.  I am going to try another MB.  Does anyone
have any suggestions of what might cause this other than a bad mem chip?
Could it be an OS bug?

Thank you again.

Stew
--
--                                                        ___________________
  R.Stewart(Stew) Ellis, Assoc.Prof., (Off)313-762-9765  /   _____  ______ 
  Humanities & Social Science,  GMI Eng.& Mgmt. Inst.   /        / /  /  / /
  Flint, MI 48504      ellis@nova.gmi.edu              /________/ /  /  / /
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.misc
Subject: Getting word list from spell(1)
From: mike@inform.co.nz (Mike Williams)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 22:03:36 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: InForm Group, Wellington, New Zealand.


  Is there any way of getting a list of words from spell(1), to generate
  something like /usr/dict/words. 

  I don't want to have to generate all possible sequences of characters,
  and exclude the ones which pass spellcheck.  There must be a better way.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------
        Mike Williams, InForm Group Ltd., Wellington, New Zealand.
   Email: mike@inform.co.nz   Phone: 64 4 472 0996   Fax: 64 4 473 2407
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.misc
From: leibing@omi.e-technik.uni-ulm.de (Bernd Leibing)
Subject: Re: dir tree  program
Organization: University of Ulm, Germany
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 19:57:58 GMT

I use utree. A very nice utility from Peter Klingebiel. Available
per anonymous ftp from ftp.uni-paderborn.de in /unix/tools
as utree3.04-um.tar.Z.
 
-- 

Bing

---------------------------------------------
Bernd 'Bing' Leibing 
LOMI, University of Ulm, D-7900 Ulm , Germany
Email: leibing@omi.e-technik.uni-ulm.de  
Phone(Fax): +49 731 502-2514 (-2515)
---------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky comp.unix.sys5.misc:22 comp.unix.sysv386:15253
From: root@admin.mport.COM (admin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.misc,comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Binaries of GNU gcc for SYSVR4.0.3
Keywords: gcc for SVR4
Date: 5 Oct 92 16:41:28 GMT
Followup-To: comp.unix.sys5.misc
Organization: Microport Inc., Scotts Valley, CA 95066 US of A

ellis@nova.gmi.edu (Stew Ellis) writes:

>>I keep trying to compile gcc 1.42 on Intel SYSVR4.0.3, received from Intel
>>...
====================

Why don't you junk gcc 1.42 and go with gcc 2.2.2.  It compiled it on
Microport SVR4.0.4 very easily.  There is a specific configuration for
i386/SVR4 machines.  g++ and gdb also compiled easily.

The sources should be on uunet or prep.ai.mit.edu

-rbd

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*========*=*=*=*=*=*=*=========*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
Richard ducman Ducoty                                          Microport Inc.
duc@mport.com                                                  Scotts Valley, CA
root@mport.com                                                 408.438.8649
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.misc
From: sdw@meaddata.com (Stephen Williams)
Subject: Re: File Manager for Unix-based Machines
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 15:02:03 GMT

jam3n@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (John A. Mcqueen) writes:
: Greetings,
: 
: I'm not all that sure that this post belongs here but what the hey,
: here it goes.
: 
: Is there a disk management program available for unix-based machines?.
: My Father runs a Prime 325 EXL and needs a file manager, like DOS
: Manager or DOS-Shell, that can tag files, group them, move them
: among various directories, etc.  
: 
: Does such a program exist? If so, what is it and where can
: I find it?
: 
: If this is not the right group for this post, please let me
: know where I can post it.
: 

There is xdtm (X desktop manager) that's pretty good.  An X app of
course.

Try Archie to find the newest version (I have 2.3).

'About' mentions the authors:

eddyg@cogs.sussex.ac.uk
santiago@sinet.fgs.slb.com
--
Stephen D. Williams  Local Internet Gateway Co.; SDW Systems 513 496-5223APager
LIG dev./sales       Internet: sdw@world.std.com CIS 76244.210@compuserve.com
OO R&D Source Dist.  By Horse: 10028 Village Tree Ct., Miamisburg, OH 45342
GNU Support          ICBM: 39 34N 85 15W I love it when a plan comes together
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4
From: ellis@nova.gmi.edu (Stew Ellis)
Subject: Re: Unix "Lite" is not so light
Organization: GMI Engineering&Management Institute, Flint, MI
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 12:55:12 GMT

jde@esix.everex.com (Jeff Ellis) writes:

>Richard Griffiths (richardg@ssd.intel.com) wrote:
>:>|> Let me know what you net users what, while we can still add it!
>:>
>:>How about DOS filesystem support and DOS emulation capabilities. 

>Noted.......
>--
>Jeff Ellis 					jde@esix.everex.com
>Esix Computers, Inc.				
>For Support: support@esix.everex.com   For Sales:   sales@esix.everex.com
>Disclamer: I do not speak for Esix Computers, Inc or Everex Systems, Inc.

I thought DOS tasking, including the ability to run Windows 3.1 apps, was
part of the base product.  Isn't that true?

--
--                                                        ___________________
  R.Stewart(Stew) Ellis, Assoc.Prof., (Off)313-762-9765  /   _____  ______ 
  Humanities & Social Science,  GMI Eng.& Mgmt. Inst.   /        / /  /  / /
  Flint, MI 48504      ellis@nova.gmi.edu              /________/ /  /  / /
From: dsiegel@optima.UUCP (Dave Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4
Subject: Re: The bad news about Dell Unix (was: SysV)
Date: 30 Sep 92 00:23:45 GMT

From article <lch1r4INNihu@west.west.sun.com>, by johnst@west.sun.com (John Stossel):
>   The upgrade will only be $195.00 from ISC UNIX rel 3.2 ver 3.0. Sounds
> pretty inexpensive to me.

Assuming you already own ISC.  I don't, nor do I intend to spend an additional
$2K (or is it 3?) to purchase it, so that I can upgrade.

> 
>   If you still don't like Solaris. ISC UNIX rel 3.2 will be available 
> for a long time to come.

Thanks, but I like Dell just fine, which is what the discussion was originally
about.

going back to my original post, i would like to change my mind, if that is
at all possible.  I said that I would prefer that Dell did not upgrade
to Solaris 2.0.  I would like to replace that with saying that Dell has done
some mighty nice fixes on the AT&T V4, and I can be fairly sure that they
would do an adequate job of making Solaris 2.0 into a useable product.  If
they offer Solaris 2.x as an upgrade, I probably would order it, after all.
...Not that i wouldn't keep my SVR4 distribution handy just in case...

> John Stossel
> ---
> All opinions, comments and statement are my own not my employers.
> ---

-dave

--
Dave Siegel              dsiegel@cs.arizona.edu    dsiegel@biosci.arizona.edu
SysMgr, Biotec, U of Az  dsiegel@hacks.arizona.edu dsiegel@seagull.tucson.az.us
"The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of my employer,
not necessarily mine, and probably not necessary."
From: turpin@cs.utexas.edu (Russell Turpin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4
Subject: Unix "Lite" is not so light
Date: 28 Sep 1992 11:46:17 -0500
Organization: U Texas Dept of Computer Sciences, Austin TX
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

-*----
In article <22891@optima.cs.arizona.edu> dsiegel@optima.UUCP (Dave Siegel) writes:
> Also, is SVR4.2 not the "Unix Light"?  Why in the world would I 
> want a stripped down unix, incapable of most of the things I
> originally purchased it for?

My understanding is that SVr4.2 has all the function of SVr4.0,
and more.  It is light only in that it is better organized, and
so can be run with less memory.  It also provides a toolkit and
interface builder for creating Motif/OpenLook GUI programs.

Russell
From: jde@esix.everex.com (Jeff Ellis)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4
Subject: Re: Unix "Lite" is not so light
Date: 30 Sep 92 17:10:21 GMT
Organization: Esix Computers, Inc
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Scott Evernden (scott@unixland.natick.ma.us) wrote:
:>In article <1a7cspINNmmu@cs.utexas.edu> turpin@cs.utexas.edu (Russell Turpin) writes:
:>>-*----
:>>In article <22891@optima.cs.arizona.edu> dsiegel@optima.UUCP (Dave Siegel) writes:
:>>> Also, is SVR4.2 not the "Unix Light"?  Why in the world would I 
:>>> want a stripped down unix, incapable of most of the things I
:>>> originally purchased it for?
:>>
:>>My understanding is that SVr4.2 has all the function of SVr4.0,
:>>and more.  It is light only in that it is better organized, and
:>>so can be run with less memory.  It also provides a toolkit and
:>>interface builder for creating Motif/OpenLook GUI programs.
:>
:>Like all the "new" Unices coming down the pike, 4.2 UnixLite (like Solaris 2)
:>is lite because all those "useless" programmer tools will not be in there:
:>
:>% cc -c xeyes.c
:>cc: Command not found.

I am testing SVR4.2 right now and it has all of the features of 4.0.4.
It has a new version of C and a graphic Debugger to run from the desktop.
It supports CD filesystems, Token Ring, X11R5,.....

BTW What features are important for you people to buy 4.2? 
(in short what should Esix do to get you to buy?)
We are talking about adding a Colorado memory tape driver and maybe shipping
it on DC20?? type tapes as a option. 

Let me know what you net users what, while we can still add it!

--
Jeff Ellis 					jde@esix.everex.com
Esix Computers, Inc.				
For Support: support@esix.everex.com   For Sales:   sales@esix.everex.com
Disclamer: I do not speak for Esix Computers, Inc or Everex Systems, Inc.
From: mwilson@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Mark Wilson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4
Subject: Re: SysV
Date: 28 Sep 92 17:23:03 GMT
Organization: NCR Engineering and Manufacturing Atlanta -- Atlanta, GA

In article <1992Sep26.031356.26227@access.digex.com> breinhar@access.digex.com (Robert B. Reinhardt) writes:
In article <DRW.92Sep24142843@riesz.mit.edu> drw@riesz.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley) writes:
DW:I've had BSD vs. SysV flame wars with friends, and I finally boiled my
DW:objections down to:
DW:
DW:	Sys V doesn't have:
DW:		- symbolic links
DW:		- long file names
DW:		- job control
DW:	Unfortunately, I use these features all the time.
DW:
DW:I'm told that R4 solves these problems.  Is that true?

RB:Well SCO Unix ODT 2.0 has all that and shared libraries too.

I'm using AT&T V.4 and it does have all of those things.

-- 
Mark
My opinions are mine, all mine.  Unless someone else claims them first.
Mark.Wilson@AtlantaGA.NCR.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4
From: fyta@chulkn.chula.ac.th ("Dr. Yunyong Teng-amnuay")
Subject: sendmail for SVR4
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 12:09:30 +0700 (THA)
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA22381; Fri, 25 Sep 92 22:26:17 -0700
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA23903; Fri, 25 Sep 92 22:26:12 -0700
X-Received: by chulkn.chula.ac.th (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C)id AA09391; Sat, 26 Sep 92 12:28:12 +0700
X-To: comp.unix.sys5.r4.usenet
X-Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

The SVR4 of AT&T UNIX uses "mailsurr" file instead of "sendmail.cf".
The mailsurr is not flexible enough to parse addresss for me.  Do you
know of any remedy for this?

We set up Internet connection from Thailand to Virginia (UUNET) with
leased line 9600 and are using a borrowed DECStation 5000 running
ULTRIX 4.2 with DNS and sendmail.  We will have to switch soon to an
AT&T 386/486 with SVR4.0.2 or higher.

Yunyong

Dr. Yunyong Teng-amnuay
Centers of Academic Resources		Voice:	(662) 218 2925
Chulalongkorn University		Fax:	(662) 215 3617
Phyathai Rd., Bangkok 10330, Thailand	Internet: fyta@chulkn.chula.ac.th

Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4