HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: marc@owlnet.rice.edu (Marc Bennett Hirsh)
Subject: Re: Neil Young
Organization: Rice University
Distribution: world,local
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:11:43 GMT

Well, there seems to be alot of people responding negatively to Neil Young.
Does he have an ego? I haven't seen it. Course, I haven't really seen much
on Neil anyway. And even if he does, does it matter? If anybody in this 
world has the right, I'd think it would be Neil. Maybe not. Forget it. Let's
just look at the music.

Buffalo Springfield was great, due in no small part to Neil Young. I'm no
big fan of CSN/Y, although they did have some great tunes. Still, the best
of those songs (IMHO) were from Neil ("Helpless," "Ohio") and Stills (he
was a FANTASTIC bass player. Listen to "Suite:JBE" and his contribution to
Joni Mitchell's "Blue" album. Incredible playing). 

Young's solo career is brilliant, even if there are some things that I can't
stand ("Landing On Water" comes immediately to mind). Has any other solo 
artist been so diverse throughout their career? "Rust Never Sleeps," 
"Freedom," "Tonight's the Night," "Ragged Glory," "After The Gold Rush." All
great albums. I've only seen Rolling Stone give ***** to two albums of all
new material: R.E.M.'s "Automatic for the People" and Young's "Freedom."
Of course, you may think Rolling Stone sucks. And you may be right. Still,
I can't help but think that they hit on something.

So, to sum up:
 Ego big.
 Music good.
 Springfield great.
 CSNY not bad.
 Solo brilliant.
 "Landing on Water" terrible.
 Dan Quayle not an issue any more.

Neil Young is great. I can't say it better than that.
-- 
Marc Hirsh (marc@owlnet.rice.edu)

"Now I'm telling the computer that I will share the prize with it if it tells
  me where the rest of the tickets are. (pause) It says, `What would a
  computer do with a lifetime supply of chocolate?' (pause) Right. Now I'm
  telling the computer EXACTLY what it can do with a lifetime supply of
  chocolate..."
   --- snappy end-of-file sign-off quote from Willy Wonka and the Chocolate
        Factory. Hi mom.

\ /
 ^ --- ugly red source of all evil, but I saw Neil Young solo and acoustic 
 V      this summer, so :p
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: amie@hubcap.clemson.edu (Amie Spitzer)
Subject: Re: Steely Dan
Organization: Clemson University
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 20:39:08 GMT

mdl@cypress.com (Matt Landrum) writes:


> ive been thinking, one great band that no one has mentioned is steely
>   dan!  any other steely dan fans out there? ive only recently started
>   listening to them but their GREAT! can anyone reccomend some good
>   albums by them?!

>   Scott.

>Pretzel Logic, Katy Lied, and Aja are my 3 favorites.
>Of course you can't go wrong with A Decade of Steely Dan.

>Donald Fagan's solo album, Nightfly, is also
>exxxxxxxxxxxxxcellent!

>--


>Matt Landrum                    | mdl@cypress.com
>Cypress Southeast Design Center | office: (601) 324-4609, FAX - 4614
>1 Research Blvd, Suite 200      | "There's a fine line between 
>Starkville, MS  39759           |  stupid and clever" -- Spinal Tap


I am a fan of Steely!! And you named my favorites, but can ANYONE out there
tell me what ever happened to these people? They were very private to begin 
with so I don't even know ANYTHING about them besides their music. Can anyone
fill me in?
                                               Amie 
amie@clemson.clemson.edu
amie@hubcap.clemson.edu

Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: severian@leland.Stanford.EDU (Kevin Christopher Henry)
Subject: Re: Jethro Tull
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: world,local
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 09:36:25 GMT

In article <1eg7tkINNfhl@bigboote.WPI.EDU> martino@wpi.WPI.EDU (Robert Paul Martino Jr) writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.095427@ece.arizona.edu> sununu@ece.arizona.edu (Arun Vaidyanath) writes:
>>Have seen and read discussions on all time greats and surprisingly, no one
>>person has brought out the musical genius of Ian Anderson and Jethro Tull.
>>Agreed, that Tull is a musically educated group and may not possess the
>>raw sexual energy and spontaneity of groups like the Stones, but the rich 
>>vocals and the Robert Burn-esque lyrics of Anderson are unsurpassed.
>>Personally, I still enjoy the new Tull albeit nowhere compared to his 
>>earlier classics. Tull, after all is Tull!!!
>>And like his heavy horses, he truly moves the land underneath!!!
>>
>>So guys, hope to hear from some Tull fans real soon!!
>>
>>Arun
>
>I agree, Ian Anderson is quite a musical genius.  Not to mention
>excellent performer (acoustic guitar, flute, etc.).
>
>I'm impressed by the WIDE variety of styles that Tull has been
>involved with, if you listen to Aqualung then Under Wraps right after
>you'd never think it was the same group if you didn't know better.
>
>My favorite Tull sogs are the intricate acoustic pieces like
>Cheap Day Return, Wond'ring Aloud, Requiem, Slipstream....
>most of them only a minute and a half or so but extremely
>intricate and original, I'm amazed how someone can just think
>up music like that.  
>
>Rob
>
>P.S.  BTW the new live acoustic album is great!!!!  Anyone agree?

Ian certainly is extremely talented, and Jethro Tull is my favorite group, but
I have to strongly disagaree with you about being impressed with the 
diversity of Under Wraps. This horrid album is probably the worst piece of 
crap I've ever purchased. Why, if it weren't for Under Wraps #2, I'd...
well, I'd do something bad. It's techno-pop, and even the box-set made fun of
it!

Of course, JT has shown a wide variety of styles over the years. Listen to
This Was and Minstrel in the Gallery after each other. (And these are actually
GOOD albums)

P.S. I agree, the short acoustic pieces are the best.
From: lib1p@rosie.uh.edu (Tammy Stark Blandino)
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
Subject: Zep vs. Rush
Date: 20 Nov 1992 19:04 CST
Organization: University of Houston
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: rosie.uh.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

Fuck the debate....

I LOVE THEM BOTH!!!!!!

Tammy\
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: amck@rowdy.mcc.com (Alan McKendree)
Subject: Re: Van Morrison
Keywords: Van the Man
Organization: MCC
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 16:16:27 GMT

In article <1eclbqINN9f1@im4u.cs.utexas.edu> tanksley@cs.utexas.edu (Lynn M. Tanksley) writes:
>Any one have any opinions on the classic rock-ness of Van Morrison?
>
>-- 
>    ..
>   {__} Lynn


Well, since you asked, and no offense intended, I can't stand him.  I
think it's something about his voice quality (which, I'm sure, is
exactly what some people love about him).  Besides, "Brown-eyed Girl"
is the only thing he did I can recall that I'd classify as rock, and
that's much closer to the bubble-gum of "Sugar, Sugar" and "I'm a
Believer" (both of which I do like) than serious rock-n-roll.

Alan
I know that the hypnotized never lie.
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
Subject: Re:  Firstpost Challenge
From: jimbo@csusb
Date: 17 Nov 92 18:03:11 PST
Organization: California State University, San Bernardino
Nntp-Posting-User: cvakgaaq

Just discovered this new group and I must say I'm glad
that its here!  Anaway, I have a little difficulty
selecting just 1 group as the all time best.  My 3
personnal faves are Cream, Zep and the Band.  If I had
to choose just one I would barely give the edge to Zep,
mainly because they grew with each album.  The band
improved its artistry and range without losing their
drive which makes them the best.

Other candidates I may nominate would be Steppenwolf,
Beatles and Traffic.

Just my two cents worth.  

Tony Ardelean
CalState University, San Bernardino

My opinions are my own and have no basis in reality.
From: vcsc458@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu (Roy J.)
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
Subject: Re: The best is...
Date: 16 Nov 92 23:07:31 GMT
Organization: San Francisco State University

In article <1e70dbINNq43@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> maf10@po.CWRU.Edu (Moses A. Fridman) writes:
>
> 
>HENDRIXHENDRIXHENDRIXHENDRIXHENDRIXHENDRIXHENDRIXHENDRIXHENDRIXHENDRIX
>
>(Sorry, got a little excited.  This is an excellent idea for a group)
>
>                                           
>                                                        Moses
> 
>-- 
> | |^\   /\   \   |   \   |   /| | |\   +--- \   | "Ask for thyself another
> | | / /    \ | \ |   | \/|  X | | | \  |--  | \ |  kingdom, for that which
> | | \ \____/ |  \|   |   | / \| | |__/ \___ |  \|  I leave is too small 
>      \           |       |                      |  for thee"

So which one is it?  HENDRIXHENDRIXHENDRIX or IRON MAIDEN?
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: vcf1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Victoria C Fike)
Subject: Re: the Offten over looked BOC
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 23:52:17 GMT
Reply-To: vcf1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Victoria C Fike)
X-Posted-From: cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <1992Nov20.174842.20544@linus.mitre.org> jswartz@mbunix.mitre.org (Swartz) writes:

>I have all their albums on CD, including the "Bad Channels" soundtrack.  I
>understand that they will be releasing a new album sometime soon.  

Yeah, originally they said it would be out this month, but I believe it's been
postponed until next spring.  Argh...

>Anyone from the BOC list out there who can tell us what's up with BOC?  I
>also was a subscriber, but had to cancel since 95% of the 20-60 messages a
>day that I got were about Hawkwind.

Not as much traffic, but still largely Hawkwind.  (Whom I like, but I am
much more fond of BOC.  Sigh.)

What did you want to know?  :-) :-)

Tori

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Victoria C. Fike                    |   "Raise your can of beer on high
vcf1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu         |    And seal your fate forever;
Lurking Girl of the LNH             |    Our best years have passed us by--
"If you must be a hero, always re-  |    The Golden Age of Leather..."
member what the word hero means."   |       --Blue Oyster Cult
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: daugherb@b8.b8.ingr.com (Bruce Daugherty)
Subject: Re: Doors - overrated
Summary: American Music
Organization: Intergraph
Distribution: world,local
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:53:14 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.234928.8958@seas.smu.edu>, shyamal@seas.smu.edu (Shyamal Prasad) writes:
> In article <1992Nov17.100224@ece.arizona.edu> sununu@ece.arizona.edu (Arun Vaidyanath) writes:
> >Personally, I feel that the DOORS got so big only because they were
> >American. I strongly believe that all of classic rock is British and 
> >the Doors were over-rated since this great land of theirs had to be up
> >to the times. 
> 
> Wow......
> 	Bob Dylan
> 	The Band
> 	The Jefferson Airplane
> 	Little Feat
> 	Buffalo Springfield
> 	....
> I would hate to give up on these guys just because they were American's
> trying to be 'up to the times'.
> 
> I think it's Jim Morrison who is hyped up more than he should be,
> the Doors are classic - check out "L.A. Woman" (the album), it that
> isn't rock-n-roll destined to be classic I'm not sure what is.
> 
> -- 
> Shyamal Prasad, Department of Computer Science
> Southern Methodist University, Dallas TX 72275



**    While the British invasion brought us some great music and person-
**    alities, it was infact the American black bluesmen that the majority
**    of the big British bands got their inspirations. It is also from this
**    vein that alot of music you hear even today grew from. The blues had
**    a baby and they named it rock-n-roll!! John Lennon idolized Elvis,
**    Elvis got recorded because he had a black voice.
**         As far as the Doors go, you had a uniche blend of classical,jazz,
**    and Spanish flemenco instrumentalists who along with a literary genius 
**    went out to join the rock-n-roll invasion. Their music hit people so
**    quick and hard it was like the first time you got pantsed in a crowd!
**    And yes Morrison was god-hyped by the media, along with many others,
**    he was however reguarded early in life as an intellectual genius, ever
**    read Niche,? Ever tried to understand Niche,? Morrison would have made
**    it without music. But if you don't appreciate the Doors music, that is
**    your right, remember there were those who liked the Monkeys.
**
**                                  "Loose Bruce"
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
Subject: I'M NEW AND THIS IS GREAT
From: klacher@catarina.gac.edu (Kimberly A Lacher)
Date: 17 Nov 92 21:34:34 -0600

Hey EVERYBODY!

This news group is so great!!!!!!
A bunch of my friends just started on the system and were telling me how  
great it was to get mail from people all over!!!!!
They read the personals and stuff like that, then tonite I opened an  
account and discovered this group.  You guys are so cool!!!!!
It would be really nice to meet a bunch of you!!!!
My all time favorite band is LED ZEPPELIN, but some of my other favorites  
(In no particular order) are The DOORS,The BEATLES, CLAPTON, RUSH, some  
ROLLING STONES, and numerous others!!!!
I was also wondering if there were any girls in this group?
(Not that I mind reading the stuff that you MEN write)
It seems that not many females enjoy this type of music, unless it's a  
ballad of some sort!!!!!!
So if any females are out there I would love to hear from you!!!
(Males too of course!!!!!)
So, I hope to hear from some of you!!!
My address:  klacher@nic.gac.edu

                                    -----------Kim-------------

"Did you ever really need somebody, really need 'em bad?
Did you ever really want somebody, best love you ever had?"

                               -TEN YEARS GONE-
                                   Led Zeppelin


P.S. Age: 18 
     Height: 5'5"
     Hair:Long, blond
     Eyes:green
      *If it matters



Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.hard
From: rswann@nyx.cs.du.edu (Richard Swann)
Subject: Deep Purple
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix (sponsored by U. of Denver Math/CS dept.)
Disclaimer1: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University of
Disclaimer2: Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
Disclaimer3: control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 12:01:06 GMT

I have heard that Ian Gillan has rejoined Deep Purple, and they are
planning an album and tour next year.

Can anyone throw any light on this subject for me?

Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: cid@athena.mit.edu (Derek H Cedillo)
Subject: Ladies and gentlemen....THE DOORS!!!!
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 08:40:18 GMT

Without a doubt the Doors are fantastic.
Not only do they have the toe tappin tunes like
"light my fire", "gloria", and "touch me"
But Jim's unsurpassed truth through poetry
is phenomenal!! (sp?) Particularly "the end"
and "unknown" soldier.  The guy talked about everything
nobody else would!  Robby Krieger was great also 
(helped write many of the tunes with ray, particularly
the snappy ones)  Nothing is better than the live death scene
where robby "shoots" jim,

Zep is good, but I hate the new Robert plant stuff.  ICK!

I have to recomend "The Doors: In Concert" to everyone and anyone.
Even if you have all their tapes (I'm missing two, I think)
this is one to have.  Live performance in phili.


Derek

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"There Are Two Great Tragedies In Life,
	One Is Not To Get Your Heart's Desire.
		The Other Is To Get It.
				-Bernard Shaw 
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: amdavi@cs.wm.edu (Alexander M. Davis)
Subject: Re: rock-debate
Organization: The College of William and Mary
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 04:44:03 GMT

Some say the debate over progenitors of metal comes down to Zep and
Sabbath. Better yet, how about the first successful adaptation of the
blues into hard electric rock? I think it comes down to the premier
albums of these two supergroups. And, I think, Black Sabbath's first
album wins. (Okay, maybe I am talking about metal. Otherwise i would
have to go back ten or fifteen years and talk about Chuck Berry, etc.
I just wanted to get away from the reputations of modern glam metal,
which is only good when groups do nostalgic blues pieces that never
seem to be very popular...)

Both of these albums, however, beat the pants off of anything since.

- Alex Davis
amdavi@cs.wm.edu

No sig. Sorry.

Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: mystical@nmt.edu (Gurupartap Davis)
Subject: Re: Unmentioned so far?
Organization: New Mexico Tech
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 22:09:01 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.212615.10896@Virginia.EDU> jam3s@Virginia.EDU ("Jeffrey Allan Miller") writes:
>What about the Eagles?
>	Steve Miller Band?
>	Electric Light Orchestra?
>	The Guess Who?
>	Bachman-Turner Overdrive?
>	Grand Funk?	
>	CCR?
>	The Kinks?
>
>
>Just a few groups I was surprised haven't been mentioned.
>
>There is more to classic rock than Zeppelin, Floyd, and their
>derivatives.

How bout The Police?


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gurupartap Davis         |I don't have any employers, and if I did, they
mystical@jupiter.nmt.edu |probably wouldn't care about my opinions.
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: flanad@vccsouth23.its.rpi.edu (Pink Floyd)
Subject: Re: Floyd Box
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 02:26:28 GMT

fineston@pop.cis.yale.edu (Jason Finestone) writes:
> Hey, all.  Sorry to disrupt the arguments about best bands, etc., but I
>was wondering if anybody knew what the track listing on the upcoming(?)
>Pink Floyd box set was.  
>  I hope that someone can tell me that this is a vicious rumor, and that
>the box set consists of live concerts, more pre-Gilmour singles/flipsides,
>and maybe the stuff off of that [recently] new Gilmour/Mason video.

The Pink Floyd Box Set, entitled "Shine On", has already been released in
Europe (soon in the U.S., I guess).  It consists of about eight remastered CDs,
including DSotM, The Wall, etc. Notably, it does not include The Piper at the
Gates of Dawn nor Atom Heart Mother. The discs are packaged in black crystal
cases with reduced cover art (sort of like the MSFL remasters). The set also
includes a compilation CD of various live material, although I'm not sure what
concerts off hand, exactly. There is also a 125 page book detailing the Floyd
over the years, and a cardboard slipcase for the collection. Hope this helps.

I wouldn't buy it. (Not for $120!! I couldn't afford it!!)

MDDave Flanagan

-- 
David W. Flanagan                -\   There is no Dark Side of the Moon,
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute  |   really. As a matter of fact, it's
flanad@rpi.edu                    \-  all dark.  --Pink Floyd, 1973
From: jam3s@Virginia.EDU ("Jeffrey Allan Miller")
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
Subject: Unmentioned so far?
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:26:15 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

What about the Eagles?
	Steve Miller Band?
	Electric Light Orchestra?
	The Guess Who?
	Bachman-Turner Overdrive?
	Grand Funk?	
	CCR?
	The Kinks?


Just a few groups I was surprised haven't been mentioned.

There is more to classic rock than Zeppelin, Floyd, and their
derivatives.

Jeff
From: curtiws@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
Subject: Re: zep
Date: 15 Nov 92 18:35:26 CST
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <Nov15.213545.26551@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>, boll@CS.ColoState.EDU (dave boll) writes:
>   Zep is one of my favorites also, but they did have a downside, IMHO.
>   Physical Grafitti was their last really strong album; then they started
>   doing crap like 'all of my love'. And you *gotta* love the drumwork
>   on good times/bad times.
> 
>   I think the most amazing thing (2 me) about Zep was their 1st album. That
>   baby came out in '69 - listen to it (again) and think of the rock climate
>   at the time: dominated by some good stuff (beatles, stones, etc) & a whole
>   lot of crap (beach boys, remember bobby goldsboro (sp?)). Sure, a couple
>   of Zep's work on that album (your time is gonna come, you shook me) fit
>   right in with the times, but other parts - hell, all other parts were
>   downright visionary for the times (ex: instrumental part on dazed & con-
>   fused).
> 
>   Here's a great topic for debate: the top classic rock albums. Here's
>   my top 4, in no particular order:
> 
>     Zep/Zep I   see above
>     Pink Floyd/Animals: Not as well known as the wall, dark side, or wish
                ^^^^^^^^^

Yee-haw,
    Someone who likes animals as much as i do.I made a friend buy it
and he didnt like it so i bought it off him about a year ago and i
listen to it about once or twice a week, its great! especially
pigs,three diffrent ones .



What a great newsgroup
i could just hug myself



Scott

Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: kellyb@ccsua.ctstateu.edu
Subject: Van the man 
Organization: Yale University, Department of Computer Science, New Haven, CT
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 21:52:32 GMT

    Van Morrison is a classic rocker without a doubt.He was the first
    product from the Emerald Isle to make it in the USA.By the way Alan
    ,if Brown eyed girl is bubble gum rock than I guess you would think
    New Kids on the Block are a jazz band, right? and to think your a Who
    fan tsk tsk tsk.

                                 B.C.Kelly
From: dhr@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Dave Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
Subject: Re: Guitar solos
Date: 19 Nov 92 10:20:39 GMT
Organization: ICL Bracknell, UK

I don't usually get involved in these 'favourite ???' lists, but guitar solos
are my *real* musical passion ( 'classic' or otherwise ), so here's a few
that spring to mind at the moment.

Dominance and Submission - Donald 'Buck Dharma' Roeser - Blue Oyster Cult.
Brothers in Arms - Mark Knopfler - Dire Straits
Still In Love With You ( Live ) - Brian Robertson - Thin Lizzy
Rock Bottom - Michael Schenker - UFO
Get the Funk Out - Nuno Bettencourt - Extreme
Marquee Moon - Tom Verlaine - Television

Note: Extreme may not have been around long enough yet to qualify as 'classic'
but I'm sure that time will come ( No flames about Nuno please ! ).

Television may be a little 'alternative' for this newsgroup, but it's still
a guitar 'classic' to me !
Dave
-- 
Dave Robinson, ICL-BRA03, Lovelace Rd, Bracknell, Berks.  RG12 4TZ.  UK
Tel: (+44) 344 481000 x5441	ITN: 7263 5441  Fax: (+44) 344 868889
EMAIL:		dhr@dsbc.icl.co.uk or dhr@oasis.icl.co.uk
ICLMAIL:	d.h.robinson@uk01
From: 5g72wheelerj@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
Subject: Re: rock-debate revisted: Beatles founders of Metal???
Date: 19 Nov 1992 00:01:40 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5g72wheelerj@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsd.csd.mu.edu

In article <00963CE5.031CE100@vms.csd.mu.edu>, 5ea8manchest@vms.csd.mu.edu writes:
>When I wrote a few days ago, a couple of people responded saying that
>the Beatles, and not Sabbath or Zeppelin, were the originators of
>heavy metal. 

Well, it seems that to search for the "origin" of something as diverse as
metal will lead one to a vacuous sort of infinite regress.  Does anyone
remember the Fugs?  They were probably as much the originators as anyone else,
but . . . 

 
Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic
From: amdavi@cs.wm.edu (Alexander M. Davis)
Subject: But then...
Summary: Simply the best.
Keywords: sex, drugs, rock-n-roll
Organization: The College of William and Mary
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:19:14 GMT

Then, there is THE supergroup of the sixties...
More poetic than the Doors,
More tuneful than the Beatles,
More rockin' than Zep,
More symphonic than Yes (etc.),
More (other admirable stuff) than (other admirable groups),

Procol Harum.

Any other Procol lovers out there?

- Alex Davis
amdavi@cs.wm.edu



Newsgroups: alt.rock-n-roll.classic