From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 23:38:40 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.160853.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <1993Jan22.213204.5867@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <C18qJL.J34@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>>>
>>>Waittaminnit!  I thought Jason was the sensitive defender of women's rights
>>>on this thread.  
>
>>>-- Andy
>> 
>> Women, yes.  Idiots, no.  The presence of Liz makes *any* defense of women
>> all the more difficult.
>> jason
>> 
>AH-HA! But, my poor boy, how can you call idiot a woman?!? 
>They all are so smart, they need to be defended... 

Oh you sad twit.  I call Liz an idiot because she is an idiot.  She
coincidentally happens to be a woman.  
 
I call you a lame, dickheaded, weasel because you are a lame dickheaded
weasel.   You happen to be a man.  I guess by your logic, I hate men and
women now.     

ALLOW ME TO ENLIGHTEN THE DARK POROUS SPACE ABOVE YOUR OILY FACE:  Idiocy
knows no gender, as you and Liz prove quite effectively.  If anything else
it provides me with convincing proof that the sexes should be treated equal
because you both demonstrate equal amounts of asininity.  Coongratualtions,
fuckwit, you fucked yourself again!

>
>And who are you to dictate that Liz is an idiot?!? GOD?
Oh, that's strikingly original.  Fortunately, it doesn't take a god to realise
that Liz is a blithering fool, or that you have a vast quantity of compost
in the place of a cerebellum.   By the same token, it would take a God, to
dictate "THE MOST WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE IN LIFE."  Lord knows, however, that
a moron like you can't underdstand the difference.  Can you?

>
She seems fun and smart to me. How can you say this?
Easily, she seems like a naive, pissant-brained little cunt to me.
And you seem like an unevolved, rubber-dicked piece of shit.


>
>Tsk, tsk, tsk, you can't do in this way, you seems to much 
>macho to me (well, not really, let me say hypocrite).

You call me a hypocrite!!  

Some of Michele's greatest hits of hypocrisy:

"I have great repect for assholes."
"I think women is okay to do what they want to do...but they are for
me to fuck and if they don't fuck then they must wait to be HIT!"
"You are cold...but I think it is okay to rape...these woman ask for it."


>
>You see, the women have to defend theirself from the people 
>like you, that want to "defend" them. 

I decided to defend WOMEN IN GENERAL from assholes like you.  I chose, also
to attack a specific person, coincidentally a female from some species.  The
two do not have anything to do with one another.  As much as I think Liz
is an utter fool, I would not subject her to your scheme of woman-enslavement.

>
>On your head you think "I will defend you, ladies! You don't 
>need to think! I can do it for you!".

I really don't care if women don't want me to defend them or not.  I never
said they didn't have to think!  I would love for someone like Liz to one
day start using her brain.  I'd love to teach you how also.

Ask yourself this:  Has any woman yet to flame me in my responses to you?
Has one person ever said, Jason, Michele is right?  Has any woman said so?
On the other hand, have you ever been flamed by anyone else for your sexism?
YES.  The evidence would indicate that I am doing a pretty good job at
pummeling you into oblivion.  I think that if anyone even gives a shit about
our argument, that they are at least sitting back and watching you get
beaten senseless time after time.  It is amazing that you have any dignity
left to continue laming away!  Why don't you go run and hide, little boy.
You are among the laughingstocks of alt.flame!!!  Even Jorn could flame
you senseless!

>
>	D E A L   W I T H   I T   P I N K   B O Y ! ! !

A breathtaking use of someone else's lame idea.
You cease to amaze me.


Newsgroups: alt.flame