HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu ("[*] Angel of Wax")
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.flame
Subject: Re: New group proposal:  alt.conservative.forum
Date: 15 Dec 92 18:43:18 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Eaters of Wisdom
In-reply-to: pearsodc@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU's message of 15 Dec 92 17:36:27 GMT

In article <1gl52rINN4mf@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu> pearsodc@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU (if God's your father then call home!) writes:
>   The net is infested with liberals.  I won't
>   say this is either good or bad, but the fact is there.  

    Sorry, you halfwit mooncalf ignoramus, but you said it was bad when
you used the word `infested'.

    I meant `halfwit mooncalf ignoramus' in a nice way, of course, so
don't take offense.

--

   Nihil tam absurde dici potest, quod non dicatur ab aliquo philosophorum.
Mark-Jason Dominus 	  			    mjd@central.cis.upenn.edu 
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.sexual.abuse.recovery,news.admin
From: jef@netcom.com (Jef Poskanzer)
Subject: Re: CFD: alt.sexual.abuse.tips new newsgroup
X-Face: uPIE),q]+zmF49L%(pdE;nX/8$/J22&&&C@_)8BouYx42Y--?*,\]*MIeTY#mCM(x>FyD@+0D-Jm]S_8lxop(Q-$L#~b8!ha;eF[b+GOLyu<]4$">NeVymJ@F#M?1O`ue4,h4`2S^KGjmP%no(d,:<Ur:+f6W8$J:'t9BxH
Reply-To: Jef Poskanzer <jef@netcom.com>
Organization: Paratheo-Anametamystikhood Of Eris Esoteric
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 05:59:43 GMT

sfjr@wam.umd.edu (Sherri):
}                                 As I see it, you have been selectively
}honest with us many times, particularly when you were trying to get 
}emotional support from readers of the group during your efforts to
}'protect' or 'rescue' an underage group member, when unbeknownst to most
}of your supporters, you were also trying to begin a sexual relationship
}with her.

Ya know, back when this botched newsgroup name first appeared,
I jokingly suggested that someone should create alt.sexual.abuse.tips
to impress upon the bozo who created a.s.a.r just what was wrong
with the name she chose.  Now it sounds like such a group might actually
get some use.
---
Jef

           Jef Poskanzer  jef@netcom.com  jef@well.sf.ca.us
The only problem with being a man of leisure is that you can never stop
                           and take a rest.
From: terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: New newsgroup proposal - alt.quotations
Date: 18 Dec 92 07:22:46 GMT
Organization: St. Peter's College, US

In article <1992Dec17.050937.29982@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>, slb22@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Seth "the Lesser") writes:
> `alt.motd' (Members Of The Dead) is bogus, having been replaced by
> `soc.necrophilia'.  :-)

  And here I I had it aliased to rec.music.gdead. Thanks for enlightening me 
8-)
	Terry Kennedy		Operations Manager, Academic Computing
	terry@spcvxa.bitnet	St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA
	terry@spcvxa.spc.edu	+1 201 915 9381
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: lllowen@netcom.com (lllowen)
Subject: Question on general trivia: Imponderables
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 06:11:35 GMT

Is there a newsgroup dedicated to general questions?  Meaning, some type
of group that basically encompasses trivia questions, but yet are seriously
answerable.  Like, you're wondering who that person was that wrote that
book, or why a 2x4 doesn't really measure 2x4, or why are manhole covers
round...etc?  

If anyone has read any of the David Feldman series of Imponderables,
this general trivia might be interesting.
-- 

Lon Lowen Jr.                        |  Wayne State University
Netcom Online Communications         |  Detroit, Michigan
lllowen@netcom.com                   |  (lllowen@mts.cc.wayne.edu)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: nadeau@bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau)
Subject: Re: This is ONLY a concept
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 04:34:51 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.130806.12064@nevada.edu> thealien@nevada.edu (Minstrel Alien) writes:
>
>	What exactly is needed to justify an alt.fan group?
>
>		What I conceptualize at the moment is
>
>			alt.fan.boc
>
>To discuss the music, background, etc of the group Blue Oyster Cult.

Now, picture for a moment a Usenet reader.  He's a fan of Blue Oyster Cult.
"Gee," he asks, "I wonder if there's a Blue Oyster Cult newsgroup.  Let
me see - ah here it is, alt.fan.boc - obviously dedicated to Blue Oyster
Cult!"

I dunno - there's something wrong with this picture . . .

In brief - you need a clearer name (even assuming there will be that
many Blue Oyster Cult fans out there looking for a newsgroup . . .)

       The Rhealist - nadeau@bnr.ca - Speaking only for myself
From: Jym Dyer <jym@mica.berkeley.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: Question on general trivia: Imponderables
Date: 18 Dec 1992 20:28:35 GMT
Organization: The Naughty Peahen Party Line
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: lllowen@netcom.com's message of 14 Dec 92 06:11:35 GMT

=o= When I worked at DEC, we had a NOTESfile (the DEC-internal
equivalent of a newsgroup) called "Ask the Enet," which was
pretty much like what you have in mind.  It was one of my
favorites.

=o= If such a newsgroup were to be started up, though, I
wouldn't recommend using the word imponderables (TM).  Part
of the reason for this is that imponderables (TM) is an
official trademark of David Feldman's.

=o= The other part of the reason is that Feldman isn't really
the best purveyor of these things.  He has too much faith in
PR departments, and passes their responses along, practically
verbatim.  I much prefer Cecil Adams' _The_Straight_Dope_,
though I don't really recommend that as a newsgroup name.

=o= We used "Ask the Enet" because of the dull-but-functional
_Boston_Globe_ feature, "Ask the _Globe_."
    <_Jym_>
From: mlr@stan.xx.swin.oz.au (ROSE M)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: alt.pub.cloven-shield NOT!!!!!
Date: 14 Dec 92 03:25:23 GMT
Organization: Comp. Centre, Swinburne University of Tech., Melbourne, Australia

Leave it as is - it it works, why try to fix it? I vote against the name
change.

Melinda
From: twcaps@tennyson.lbl.gov (Terry Chan)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: alt.questions
Date: 20 Dec 1992 02:41:05 GMT
Organization: Department of Redundancy Department
Reply-To: TWChan@lbl.gov (Terry Chan)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.12.117

In response to twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce): 

  +>Don't we already have misc.misc?

shulick@navajo.ucs.indiana.edu (Sam Hulick) writes:

  +misc.misc is too misc.  It has more than just questions.  People
  +reporting stuff, saying things.. IMO, trash.

Sam, how do you expect alt.questions to be necessarily any 
different?  Gonna moderate it? [heh]  Think about it.  People
will ask questions.  Other people will jump in.  Some will
be right, many will be off the cuff.  The comments are at odds
with other people's memories or knowledge and they jump in.
[Could be fun though.]

I forgot about misc.misc.  I guess the advantage of alt.questions
is the name.  Based on your comments of misc.misc and the trash
content in other groups, I think there's a very good chance that you
'll be turned off by alt.questions within a couple of months.  

Terry Chann
--
Energy and Environment Division   | Internet:  TWChan@lbl.gov
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory      | 
Berkeley, California  USA  94720  | Carpe Per Diem
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: thealien@nevada.edu (Minstrel Alien)
Subject: This is ONLY a concept
Organization: The Danger Zone
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 13:08:06 GMT


	What exactly is needed to justify an alt.fan group?

		What I conceptualize at the moment is

			alt.fan.boc

To discuss the music, background, etc of the group Blue Oyster Cult.

		Since I have no idea whether this would be appropriate, 
any response would be welcome.

Where the <bleep> did my .sig go?
The Alien[DZ89]
Newsgroups: alt.config,rec.arts.books,alt.non.sequitur
From: jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (JKF)
Subject: Re: alt.fan.catch-22 (Was: Re: PROPOSAL: alt.fan.anne-rice)
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 10:15:28 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.044503.21309@cheshire.oxy.edu> wolf@cheshire.oxy.edu (Clinton Richard Wolf) writes:
>>
>>Hey!  I got an idea!  How about a group called alt.fan.catch-22?  I've
>>always been a big fan of Joseph Heller's masterpiece.  Yossarian Lives!
>>
>>Heh heh heh heh heh.
>>
> I think Catch-22 is the closest thing to a bible there is for me...
>
> Form the newsgroup, or I'll slit your throat from ear to ear.. :)

*blink*  

Wow, someone else on the net brave enough to admit that Catch-22 makes a
lot more sense for them than the real Bible.  Nately's whore would be proud!
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: New group proposal: alt.conservative.forum
Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Turkey Division
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:31:13 GMT

In article <92350.145137KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>Why do we need a moderated group?  There are intelligent liberals here, who
>help stimulate thought.  The stupid ones are easy to ignore (or flame, which-
>ever is your preference. :)

It still creates noise.  If we can have a moderated soc.feminism
group, we can have a moderated group for conservatism.

My question is why does it need to be called "alt.conservative.forum?"
Couldn't it have a more intelligent name, like
"alt.politics.conservative?"

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /               Rocks say goodbye.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
From: qq11@liverpool.ac.uk (Alan Thew)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: New newsgroup proposal - alt.quotations
Date: 17 Dec 92 15:39:10 GMT
Organization: The University of Liverpool
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]

michael g moncur (mgm@world.std.com) wrote:

:   [I have consulted with the original poster of this idea, Chua Hak Lien, and
: got permission to post this.  Thanks for the idea, Chua.]
:  
:  Proposal for a new alt.group - alt.quotations (name is open for debate.)
:  
:  PURPOSE:  for quotations, quips, .sig lines, witticisms, and discussions
: of all of the above. 
:  
:  VOTES:
.....
:     I think there's quite a bit of interest.  We see quotations all over,
: particularly in  .sigs.  When this was first mentioned in alt.config,
: there were 8 responses in one day. 
:  
:   WHY AN "alt" GROUP?
:  
:     I'm not THAT sure about the interest, and this topic will have a very
: large "fluff factor."  If it works out as an alt group, perhaps a "talk"
: or other USENET group will come of it.
:  
....
Why not issue a RFD for a talk group if you're talking about votes etc?
-- 
Alan Thew
alan.thew@liverpool.ac.uk   ...!uknet!liv!alan.thew   +44 51 794 3735
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl)
Subject: hm
Organization: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 00:24:25 GMT

First I create alt.long-hair, then I set up my own hierarchy, and when
I'm done, I'll call it HairNet.
Newsgroups: alt.config,news.groups
From: galt%peruvian.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Greg Alt)
Subject: Re: Advertising on Net: how can we stop it?
Date: 12 Dec 92 21:04:33 MST
Followup-To: news.admin,news.sysadmin,news.groups,alt.config
Reply-To: galt%peruvian.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu
Organization: University of Utah, CS Dept., Salt Lake City

In article <1992Dec13.032746.3695@clarinet.com>, brad@clarinet.com (Brad Templeton) writes:
>>I guess next we'll hear you moaning that Unix discussions are "banned"
>>from rec.books or something equally silly.
>
>No they are not.   But you're saying you want a universal ban on commercial
>postings in all groups not dedicated to advertising, and you want to ban
>postings based on the motives of the poster rather than whether their topic
>is germane to the topic of the newsgroup.

There is no way to "ban" things on the net.  The only thing close to it
is to send hate mail to the poster, the poster's admin, and the admin 
of the poster's feed.  If the person sending the hate mail is crazy,
the hate mail will be ignored.  If there is a ton of hate mail coming
from a variety of persuasive people, the poster will likely stop posting
the offensive material, either because they do not wish to offend or
their account or feed was pulled as a result of hate mail.

This works regardless of the reason the post was considered offensive.

>group.  But you're saying that commercial book publishing information is
>not welcome in a books group, and that is banning something.  Something
>people *want* to read.

Telling someone that a post is unwelcome on a group is NOT banning anything.
If most of the people in the newsgroup want to read the advertising, then
there will be little hate mail sent to the poster.  If the advertising
is generally not wanted, there will be a large amount of hate mail.  It
all takes care of itself without anyone banning anything.

>You misunderstand the desire of people to see advertising.  The fact
>that misc.forsale groups now surpass rec.humor.funny and alt.sex and all
>the computer books in readership says more than just that ads are
>desired in their own groups.  It says that people will go out of their
>way to see ads -- even ads that are put in an unorganized mishmash.

I read misc.forsale.computers.other, and I like it because it is similar
to reading the classifieds in a paper.  I would be very annoyed if major
corporations started to flood it with ads for their products.
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.mud,rec.games.mud.misc
From: russ@math.okstate.edu (R. Nomad)
Subject: Re: alt.mud.logs,alt.mud.logs.d,alt.mud.fiction,alt.mud.fiction.d
Organization: Aggie? What precisely is an Aggie?
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 17:58:20 GMT

In <1992Dec11.030109.16251@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (JKF) writes:

>Well, the proposed rec.games.mud.* additions: *.logs, *.logs.d, *.fiction,
>and *.fiction.d., all failed, I open discussion on creating analogous
>groups within the alt. hierarchy.  Jim Miller, the master of Secret Ninja
>Logging, is still interested in serving as moderator of *.logs, and I'm
>trying to find out from Tank Girl if she still wants to moderate
>*.fiction.  I think there's enough interest out there for these groups to
>exist... let's have some comment.

Horsecrap.  If there were, they wouldn't have been not so much defeated
as soundly smashed.

This joke is old, stupid, and finished.  Why not let it die instead of
flogging it some more?

-- 
---------------------===Comedy!  Sudden, violent comedy!===--------------------
Russ Smith -- russ@math.okstate.edu  |  "This is the Nineties, Bubba, and
  Don Random of the "Random Gang"    |   there is no such thing as Paranoia.
What a pinhead! Does he not fear us? |   It's all true." -- Hunter S Thompson
Xref: sparky alt.config:7836 alt.folklore.urban:30925
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Why issue RMGROUPS?
From: dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz (Kennelmeister)
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 03:46:20 +1300
Organization: The Dawghaus BBS, Palmerston North, New Zealand (+64 6 357 9245)
Keywords: What do you want?

dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz (Kennelmeister) writes:
> tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood) writes:
> > In article <1992Dec3.095804.2131@dct.ac.uk>, ccdarg@dct.ac.uk (Alan Greig) 
> > > In article <10463@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>, tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
> > 
> > > It occurs to me that if someone was to send out a few million newgroup
> > > messages for alt.random-letters. Bruce Becker would be forced by his own
> > > policy to create the lot and with any luck might self explode.
> > > ;-)
> > 
> > Hey, if it's our goal to make Bruce Becker explode, let's just force feed
> > him Alkaseltzer tablets (a la "The Exploding Seagull" Urban Legend).  Then
> > again, newgrouping 10,000 bogus alt groups would be exactly like feeding
> > Alkaseltzer tablets to seagulls.  Maybe Bruce, unlike the gulls, really
> > WOULD explode.
> > 
> 
> How about a bunch of offensive/slanderous (to Bruce) newsgroups?
> 
> I'd like to see his reaction when someone issued rmgroups.
> Would he break his "alt is forever" policy for a group like
> alt.child-molester.bruce-becker?   :-)

Thanks (NOT!) to whoever forged a newgroup for this in my name.
Can you spell Rhetorical? Did you see the smiley?
I'm waiting for the e-bombing....

--
Alan B                           See Janet's ball. See John's chainsaw
Dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz       See Spot run. Run, Spot, run!
Dawghaus BBS +64 6 357-9245      Far too slow......
Palmerston North, New Zealand    Spot's in bits. Run Janet Run!


Newsgroups: alt.config
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: alt.fan.multics, any interest in a Multics (OS) newsgroup?
Keywords: group creation alt
Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Turkey Division
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 03:01:07 GMT

I've got a better idea -- alt.music.multics!  No, better yet:
alt.current-events.multics!  But wait, what about alt.guitar.multics?
Or possibly alt.desert-storm.multics?  Clearly we'll have to have lots
and lots of discussion on this ...

Moral of the story: when proposing a new group, choose hierarchies
carefully.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /               Rocks say goodbye.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) / 
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl)
Subject: Re: New group proposal: alt.conservative.forum
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 18:18:13 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM Rochester

In article <1gqb17INN59o@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, rick@crick.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Richard H. Miller) writes:
|> In article <92352.102515KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>, Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
|> > In article <BzDnnu.L9K@news.udel.edu>, roby@chopin.udel.edu (Scott W Roby) says:
|> > 
|> > >I vote for democracy in action -- no moderation.
|> > 
|> > And I agree.
|> 
|> Then you will have no problem with proposing the misc.activism.progressive
|> be unmoderated? (Actually I am surprised that nobody has proposed the
|> perfect name for this newsgroup --> misc.activism.conservative)

All I know is that it is easier to start a group in the
alt.* heirarchy, since the others are considered more
"permanent".  And if your going to have a moderated group,
make sure the person who moderates it is someone who won't
get caught up in the discussion too much.  Also, most of 
the moderated groups I've read are really boring.  

Jared Dahl
Opinions expressed are mine, not my employer's.
Don't send e-mail - I won't get it.
From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: Suppression
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 14:03:38 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

ccdarg@dct.ac.uk (Alan Greig) writes:
> Of course I could just feed all the groups back into uknet and see what
> happens. They don't block messages from uk nodes strangely enough...

No?  They certainly used to.  God knows how many separate feeds of alt.sex
must go across the Atlantic...


mathew

Newsgroups: alt.config
From: thealien@nevada.edu (Minstrel Alien)
Subject: Re: This is ONLY a concept
Organization: The Danger Zone
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 23:49:36 GMT

	Well, while I have been informed that a newsgroup would be...

		not needed....

			The name would work!

	Any BOC fan KNOWS what BOC means!  Now, if we could add the two dots 
above the 'o', that would be great..


	But who cares, as I am no longer convinced it needs to be done..


Minstrel

Newsgroups: alt.config
From: bcash@crchh410.BNR.CA (Brian Cash)
Subject: Re: Alt.quotes newsgroup?
Reply-To: bcash@crchh410.BNR.CA (Brian Cash)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 05:38:14 GMT

In article <27967@dog.ee.lbl.gov>, twcaps@tennyson.lbl.gov (Terry Chan) writes:
|>c188-cr@po.berkeley.edu (Chua Hak Lien) writes:
|>
|>  +>Anyone interested in a alt.quotes newsgroup, where interesting
|>  +>quotes or proverbs can be shared, or traced? 
|>
|>I would suggest making it alt..sig, hmmm...how about alt.\.sig...er..
|>well, something like that.  After all, it's probably likely that much
|>of the stuff will come from .sigs.
|>
|>Terry ".name" Chan
|>--
|>Energy and Environment Division   | Internet:  TWChan@lbl.gov
|>Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory      | 
|>Berkeley, California  USA  94720  | Carpe Per Diem
              
How about alt.warlord.bait, then?

Brian /-|-\
From: pashley@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Montykins)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: Proposal: alt.tv.saved.by.the.bell
Date: 14 Dec 92 08:24:22 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <1992Dec14.003040.22660@ncsu.edu>, jecoleb@eos.ncsu.edu writes:
>
>I'd prefer to propose:
>
>alt.tv.teen.exploitation.shows

No, no, no. The ".shows" is probably unnecessary. Also, an
"alt.tv.teen.etc" hierarchy is unlikely. How about
"alt.tv.exploitation.teen"? This would allow for:
                    .infant
                    .plants
                    .bigfootf
                    .politicians

and so on.

 -Paul "Monty" Ashley
   (In fact, maybe "exploitation" should be before "tv" so's to
allow for "alt.exploitation.movies" which actually would get a
reader or two.)
-- 
All just the opinions of pashley@sdcc13.ucsd.edu.
Newsgroups: alt.config
From: shulick@navajo.ucs.indiana.edu (Sam Hulick)
Subject: PROPOSAL: alt.questions
Originator: shulick@navajo
Reply-To: shulick@navajo.ucs.indiana.edu
Organization: Vallen Software
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 20:11:37 GMT


Well, I've been asking some people on groups what they thought of this,
and I haven't gotten a single negative response.

alt.questions would be a group where people could ask ANYTHING.  No
limit on the topic whatsoever.  I constantly find myself wondering about
trivial things, and I'm sure other people do, too.  For instance,
questions like "Who conceived windowing systems on computers," "Who
conceived the haircut," "Where did the word 'Hoosier' really come from",
etc.  Of course, this group would not be moderated.  Like I said, I've
had quite a few positive replies on this.  So.. whoever is in charge of
making new newsgroups, please consider it. :)  Thanks..
(I know nothing about the newsgroup-making process!  I was just told to
post here..)  :)

-- 
    // Amiga 3000   ___ \ Sam Hulick: shulick@indiana.edu (NeXTmail OK!)
   // 68030 25 MHz /__/\ \ My opinions wear combat boots.  Or whatever.
\\// OS 2.04       \__\/ / "Walk!  Not bloody likely.  I am going in a
 \/                     / taxi."  --George Bernard Shaw
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Newsgroups: alt.config
Subject: Re: CFV: alt.flame.hairy-douchebag.bruce-becker
Summary: I say, I say it's a joke!  A joke son!
Date: 12 Dec 92 02:57:45 GMT
Reply-To: tjw+@pitt.edu
Followup-To: alt.config
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1gal9rINN71r@news.aero.org> robert@aero.org (R. S. Statsinger)
writes:

>OK. Whaddowedo now?

We newgroup it.

Terry
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry