From: launce@medusa.med.utah.edu (Tri-Ungulate)
Subject: Re: More Money than Votes
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Trifurcate-Hooved Ruminant Surveyors, Inc.
Date: 19 Nov 92 13:22:41


Arthur T Hu and Danielle T Wei -- seperated at birth??  

In article <BxGzp7.IFv@acsu.buffalo.edu> dtwei@acsu.buffalo.edu (Danielle T Wei) writes:

>   BUSH FOR PRESIDENT IN 1996 :)
>   Actually, i think I speak for many newer immigrants here when I say that
>   our homeland's culture is rather conservative. I simply cannot stand
>   some of the "American" liberal attitudes..

Yeah, well if ya don't like th' country ya kin git the hail back to
whar yuh came frum --  guh huh huh huh 

(insert smiley face here) 

>   Yes, I can see why Koreans want to support the Republicans.. The situation
>   in L.A. is simply out of hand!! Those looters should all be executed!!

Whoa Nellie, ain't that a bit extreeeme???  Mebbe them naughty black
folks you so dislike oughta just have their right hands cut off like
in them there Muslim countries like Iran or wherever.  

> Personally, as a Chinese, I believe Bush will be more beneficial to
> us than Clinton because Bush will probably maintain a better
> relationship with China than Clinton.

But Danielle, you're in America, what do you care about China -- and
by the way who appointed you spokesperson for "us" Chinese? 

>  People often ask me "but you're in America, what do you care
>  about China?" This is true in a sense, but look at the Japanese-Americans
>  during WWII.. 

Gee, seems to me that the Japanese-Americans, whether or not they
cared more about America than Japan, were nonetheless systematically
denied their constitutional rights.  So what exactly is your point??

>  The truth is: the U.S. must pay respect to your homeland if
>   you want to live happily in the U.S.A.

Do tell. What, if as an American citizen, you happen to consider that
your homeland is not necessarily the same as your country of ethnic
origin, hmmmmm?

>   I think the biggest split between the minority groups is "who wants what."
>   Most Africans want a "united colored race" stand together against those
>   "white slave owner" while most Asians do not care that much, and would much
>   rather prefer personal wealth.

Izzatso. How, exactly do you come to these conclusions about this
ominous African groupthink?

> The biggest joke here is the NAACP: they believe they represent all
> minority groups, 

Really. Perhaps you might have left out the possibility that the NAACP
might, just might, want a means to cooperate with Asians who happen to
hold a similar political agenda?  Nah, they're just a bunch of
monolithic black folks out to ruin the country.

> Also, the NAACP supports blacks everywhere (l.a. riots),

Them folks.  Them people.  Them all think that the south-central
rioting was a *good thing* (tm) yep yep yep 

>  and thus many Asians feel NAACP is only an organization for THEM..

Well it isn't the National Association for the Advancement of Chinese
People, now is it?

>   Let's look at the facts: blacks mostly support clinton, asians mostly
>   support bush.. blacks like educational quotas (how else can they get people
>   into top schools?) 

Yeah, them black folks be too stupid to get they people into top
schools - of course - how intuitively obvious.

> I don't really think asians really care about
> bilingual education (espeically here in NY), but personally i think any
> immigrants to the U.S. should learn to speak English first, instead of coming
> here with no english and trying to change things here..

Well, you'd be excluding a good number of your fellow Chinese who wish
to become American citizens that way, my dear.

Perhaps immigrants ought to learn racial tolerance as one of many
communications skills necessary to function smoothly in a
multi-cultural society.  You could be the first student in such a programme.

Nah, all *right-thinking* immigrants (no pun intended) should
immediately and forthwith register with the Republican Party.   

That's more like it.

>   Well, I hope these Asians would join the Republican party when they get
>   a chance. Face it: the Democratic party is/will be dominated by the blacks,
>   and we will never get anywhere working with them.. 

Yeah, you've already proven that them black people be too stupid and
recalcitrant to ever work smoothly with clever Asians like yourself.

And everybody *knows* how them black people really run a puppet
government; that Jesse Jackson is the *real* president-elect, pulling
Bill Clinton's strings.  yep yep yep 

>   We must gain more power
>   by making ourselves larger in the Republican party..

As if the Republican party gives a flying fuck about the status of
Asian Americans.  All they're interested from the AA community is
campaign contributions.  Big ones prefarably.  From deadbeat non-child
support-paying types even.

>   Yes, Clinton better take care of those hate crimes if he wants any asian
>   support.. but things may get worse if clinton continues supporting
>   "protect-american-jobs" and anti-foreign-products(people) feeling

Yeah, unlike that paragon of racial harmony George (WillieHortonWill
RapeYourWifeIfYouVoteForDukakis) Bush.  Or his predecessor
Ronald (LazyBlackWelfareQueens) Reagan.

>  When are we going to have a CHINESE congressman (house or senate) 

When an American citizen who happens to be of Chinese ethnic descent
manages to convince enough people (of *all* races) that (s)he will
effectively work for their interests.  It's this thing called
democracy, see.  Perhaps you're not quite familiar with the concept.

>   p.s. this is a long article!!

Yeah, No shit.

| _, launce gouw * internet: launce@apollo.med.utah.edu * ooniversity of ootah 
|(_) medical center * department of human genetics *   palace of the brine
___) we apologise for the previous opinions. those responsible have been sacked




















Newsgroups: soc.culture.asian.american,soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.pakistan,alt.discrimination