HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Hulk, Cerebus and other stuff like Barry Allen
Date: 30 Dec 92 22:37:30 GMT
Reply-To: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Dept., Madison, WI

In <MfERBkq00WDKIGYWMV@andrew.cmu.edu> vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu (Vernon H Harmon) writes:
>Excerpts from netnews.rec.arts.comics.misc: 30-Dec-92 Hulk, Cerebus and
>other stu.. Dave Van Domelen@magnus. (2153)
>>      On Hulk in general, my first impression that PAD was trying to milk 
>> suspense that just wasn't there.  I mean, the *cover* was enough to tell me 
>> Hulk was fighting Cain Marko, and it's supposed to be some kind of big
>> surprise at the end?  Riiiight.  Of course, Hulk has an excuse, since
>> he's probably never seem Juggy without the helmet.  But to write as if
>> the *readers* didn't know?  No sir, I didn't like it.

>well, sir, maybe I was just being block-headed but I spent the whole
>issue trying to figure out who he was and smacked myself when I found
>out at the end. I guess it goes both ways, though, since some people
>were smacking themselves at the end of the latest X-Factor when you find
>out *POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT!!* Doc Samson was the psychiatrist, and I
>thought that it was so damn obvious.....

I thought the identity of Juggernaught in the latest Hulk was obvious.  I
mean, how many red-haired neanderthal-looking men are there in the Marvel
Universe who can go toe-to-toe wih the Hulk?  (I also have dim recollections
of the same trick with the Juggernaught being done before; an old X-Men,
maybe?)

-- 
Michael Rawdon				  rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department,  Madison, WI
( Now in the Boston, Massachusetts area! )

An equal-opportunity offender.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: mcmahan@cs.unca.edu (Scott McMahan -- Genesis mailing list owner)
Subject: Re: MISC: Favorite Writers
Organization: University of North Carolina at Asheville
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 22:17:39 GMT

Rob is not a bad *PLOTTER* -- the *concept* of Supreme, for example,
is very good.

He needs a good dialogue person, or a panel-by-panel writer, to carry
out these ideas.

Scott

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: tjbarre@srv.PacBell.COM (Tom Barrett)
Subject: Re: SANDMAN:Lucien's Library
Organization: The Deadbeat Club
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 00:03:52 GMT


How 'bout the "Real Live Un-expurgated Warren Commission Report"?

tjb
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: lis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Elisabeth Riba)
Subject: Re: Vertigo Preview
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 14:07:32 GMT

Robert Kelly writes:
>in short: the Veritgo Preveiw is worth 75 cents.
Damn Straight!  I am recommending this for all my friends who have
been considering the (now)Vertigo books.  Unfortunately, you can't
always get that much from two page excerpts, and some of these clips
are VERY cryptic.  

>Dani writes:

>>Death:  A three-issue miniseries.  Don't miss this.  The art is
>>attractive, if crowded, the scripting is pure Gaiman, and Death
>>is acting in character.  
>I think the woman (?) killing the pigeon is Mad Hettie a la John
>Constantine.  I think she wants to die or to kill Death.  Looks good.
Yes, that's Mad Hettie, and the boy is someone Death met in a garbage
dump.  The first panel with her refers to the cover story someone else
gave Sexton.  Incidentally, the coloring on this one really impresses
me.  It brings back the pale, but not chalky, complexion from her
first appearance.

>>Mercy:  A graphic novel about "...a spiritual entity called Mercy, 
>>and...her impact on three very different lives".  Splash pages don't
>>make good preview material; I haven't a clue what to make of this, either.
>I don't think these were splash pages... I think that is the entire 
>way the book is going to be done... bold, I must admit, but we'll see.
>Good art.  What else has JM DeMatteis done?  I can't remember.
Sounds similar to the Endless concept.  JM wrote the dialog for the
earliest issues of JL/JLI, and I think he's also doing a Spider-title.

>>All told, we can expect Vertigo to send up a fair number of trial
>>balloons over the next year or so. 
>AGREED.. I just wish VERTIGO would do things more like Big Numbers and
>Cages rather than staying with the 8 1/2 x 11 format... they could really do 
>lot more.
Well, Mercy will be a GN.  They're doing a lot of experimentation
here, and if they want people to pick these up, a higher price would
be prohibitive. 
-- 
--------------->Elisabeth Anne Riba * lis@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu<---------------
   Do not meddle in the affairs	    |  Usenet is like Tetris for people
   of cats, for they are subtle     |  who still remember how to read.
   and will piss on your computer.  |	  So many newsgroups, so little time...
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: dani@netcom.com (Dani Zweig)
Subject: LEGION 93 (spoilers)
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 23:17:26 GMT

I didn't care for this issue.  This Legion of Super Villains seems to
exist for the sole purpose of being villainous.  The implicit romance
between Garv and Strata continues to be silly:  How far would you get
with the pickup line "We're both carbon-based"?

I interpret the picture under the next-issue blurb as confirmation
that if Stealth is dead, she isn't most sincerely dead.  Do we even
have reason to believe that she possesses vital organs?

I also predict that it will turn out that things have been going
according to Dox's plans.

Btw, in the old continuity, that tyke would be Braniac III.

-----
Dani Zweig
dani@netcom.com

Roses red and violets blew
  and all the sweetest flowres that in the forrest grew -- Edmund Spenser


Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc,rec.arts.comics.xbooks,rec.arts.comics.strips
From: dani@netcom.com (Dani Zweig)
Subject: Re: Happy Squid Appreciation Day -- the SQUIDDIES are here! (Revised)
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 07:47:10 GMT

squiddies@queernet.org (Roger B.A. Klorese):
>8.  Comeback Award for most improved book

Does "Stanley and His Monster" qualify?  (The most recent issue -- #1 --
is a considerable improvement over the previous one, which was #112.)


Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: scs@lokkur.dexter.mi.us (Steve Simmons)
Subject: Re: PAD & Pros
Organization: Inland Sea
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 01:30:25 GMT

[[ uncredited writes ]]
>    On the other end:  The "pros" that PAD spoke of don't get much respect
>from me.  As "pros", I'm sure they've heard many sharp comments about their
>work.  Why ignore us?  We're that generation that made comics so huge in the
>70's & 80's.  We've seen how great they can be!  Comics have kept me around
>for so long because it seemed to have gone through an adolescence in the
>'80's along with me.  Marvel and DC grew up with me.  What is happening?  Many
>of the books out there seem to be pre-adolescent drivel.

IMHO, Marvel and DC didn't grow up.  Going back 25 years, those
Spiderman and X-Men books that looked so good then look pretty purile
now.  And they're *not* 25 years improved -- if anything, they've
gotten worse in the last decade.  It seems to me that Marvel remembered
who their audience was and started pandering to it.  DC gets a few more
points, but for the most part comics from the big two are written for
the adolescent.  They won't be changing, because that's not their
market.  Yeah, there's still a few I have lingering affection for.
But it's guilty pleasures, not mature (hate that word, but nothing
else fits) appreciation.

This puts the comics writer who works in the big two mold in a hard
place.  His audience is *not* the adult reader, and to follow the
wishes of the adult reader would mean to lose that adolescent market.
So the adult reviewer excoriates [insert name here] and others, and
the writer in turn avoids the inappropriate critic.  It's a no-win
situation.


CXMP@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA (CXMP000) writes:

>One more thing of note was that PAD credited discussion here as the
>inspiration for X-Factor #87, especially the Quicksilver dialogue, I
>imagine, which was the best part of the book.  ("arrogance an art
>form."  Suddenly this sounds ironic.)

Arrogance has been an art form as long as there has been a
self-concious literature community.  Lord Byron, Oscar Wilde and
Dorothy Parker are wonderful historical examples.  Any "killer"
review in the New York Times is a modern one.
-- 
 "When Dexter's on the Internet, can Hell be far behind?"
		-- Steve Simmons, scs@lokkur.dexter.mi.us
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Elizabeth Holden)
Subject: Re: Canadian Distributors
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC.
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 08:25:57 EST

larocqu@gaul.csd.uwo.ca (JOHN LAROCQUE) writes:

> All four stores here in London deal with Andromeda or Styx. I don't know
> why, but am intrigued. Diamond is #1 in Canada? I must be out in the boonies

Of the stores I use in Ottawa, the distributers are Andromeda or Styx.  
Who in Canada uses Diamond?  I'm not disputing that it's #1, just 
surprised.  It must be in the Toronto area, right?

:-)

Elizabeth



Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Elizabeth Holden)
Subject: Re: Nomad #8
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC.
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 06:14:57 EST

ejs16@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Eric Jaron Stieglitz) writes:

> Does anyone know who did the art and writing on Nomad #8?
> 
Good question!  I've been wondering this too, as I'm trying to catalogue 
that issue.  Is the artist Pat Olliffe?

Why were there no credits?  Just to drive us crazy?

Namaste,
Elizabeth
From: silbrmnd@acf3.nyu.edu (Darkmage)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Swamp Thing #128
Date: 1 Jan 93 20:34:36 GMT
Organization: New York University

dani@netcom.com (Dani Zweig) writes:

>Okay, I give up.  I know when I'm licked.  I'm dropping Swamp Thing.
>The Nancy Collins run shows no signs that it's going to become worth
>reading on more than an odd-issue basis.  The villains continue to
>be one-dimensional, the plots continue to be rehashes, and the story
>still has no discernible long-term direction.

One dimensional??  Didn't you see who he was fighting?  It was Stimpy!
Proteus, page 8 panel 5: "Happy!  Happy!!"
	 page 9,panel 2: "J--  HUH?"
That was *definitely* the beginning of a Joy Joy!  :)  Our so-called
Hero is fighting america's favorite, yuckiest cat!  :)  Now isn't that
worthyour $1.75?








>-----
>Dani Zweig
>dani@netcom.com

>   If you're going to write, don't pretend to write down.  It's going to be the
>   best you can do, and it's the fact that it's the best you can do that kills
>   you! -- Dorothy Parker

	-Darkmage :)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: jbarnes@andy.bgsu.edu (Julie Barnes)
Subject: Re: New releases: December 29-31, 1993
Keywords: blah, blah, rhubarb, blah, allegations denied, blah, blah
Organization: Bowling Green State Univ.
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:26:55 GMT

Well, I seem to have missed the listing for December 23.  If someone
would email me a copy I would appreciate.


Julie A. Barnes			Department of Computer Science
jbarnes@bgsu.edu		Bowling Green State University
-- 
Julie A. Barnes			Department of Computer Science
jbarnes@bgsu.edu		Bowling Green State University
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: djdaneh@pbhyc.PacBell.COM (Dan'l DanehyOakes)
Subject: Re: Why does PAD *stay* on the net?
Reply-To: djdaneh@PacBell.COM (Dan'l DanehyOakes)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 00:17:43 GMT

In article <15196.2b35ee09@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu> balbes@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:

>I have to make a comment here about predicting things.  Often
>when my wife and I watch a TV show together, I will mention my
>surprise, astonishment, etc. over a particular plot turn.

Well, of course, this is _particularly_ easy to do with TV, because the plots
are _so_ heavily cliched and retreaded, which is what makes something like TWIN
PEAKS so much fun.  (My wife and I watch STAR TREK together and have two games:
(1) saying something with or before the character, and (2) being the first to
"explain" the "mystery" of the show.  Usually one of us gets it before the first
act is over.)

(Naturally, we don't do this if we're watching TV with other people, because
it irritates the hell out of them.)


>Now, I have no doubt that what you have said above is true.  I also
>have to wonder how many other scenarios you have stated as "going
>to happen".  

Actually, this happens in most comix stories, it's not a special weakness of
PAD's.  In fact, it's only the fact that he does so much else so much better
than most of his fellow labourers in that particular cornfield that makes this
relative weakness worth mentioning.


>There are only so many directions a story can go
>in once it's been set up, and if you spout them all in some
>general fashion then later you can say you predicted what was
>going to happen.  This is how the psychics make their money.

Actually, they make their money by predicting things after the fact, and by 
exploiting a feature of human psychology:  suppose I predict that George Bush
will die this year.  You'll fairly quickly forget that I predicted this.  But
if he _does_ die, there's a good chance you'll remember my prediction _then._
If he _doesn't_, then you'll probably never think of it again.

But I'm not setting myself up as a psychic, or as a particularly astute guesser
of plot events.  Nor do I propose to predict the next half dozen issues of THE
HULK.  What I was trying to do -- since PAD says he's trying to improve as a 
writer, something I can identify with totally as a neopro SF writer -- was to
give one reader's feedback on what I see as worth working on.


>Another point.  Even if you know where the roller coaster is 
>going to end up, the ride is still fun.

Amen, and indeed the PADcoasters are generally a great deal of fun.

		When you're stuffing yourself at the Christmas parties,
		don't be surprised when I tell you to take a running jump.
		You're missing the point I'm sure does not need making:
		the Christmas spirit is not what you drink.
			--Ian Anderson

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes, Net.Roach
My opinions do NOT represent Pacific Bell,
Professional Development, or anyone else.
But I'm willing to share.
From: aiello@cps.msu.edu (PUT YOUR NAME HERE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Favorite Writers
Date: 29 Dec 92 04:30:29 GMT
Reply-To: aiello@shale.cps.msu.edu.cps.msu.edu (PUT YOUR NAME HERE)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Michigan State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: shale.cps.msu.edu
Originator: aiello@shale.cps.msu.edu

#1 Stan Lee:
	If you doubt that he doesn't still have the touch check out
	Ravage 2099.

#2 Jim Starlin

#3 Alan "Frag-off" Grant

others:
	Roy Thomas 
	Jim Shooter
	Bob Layton

honorable mention:
	Peter David:
		Just finished Hulk:FutureImperfect and I must say
		it is PAD's best work yet.  And if anyone has any
		doubt, George Perez is the BEST there is at what he 
		does!
From: morpheus@cco.caltech.edu (Kynn Bartlett)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: LSH #40, Squires and pages....
Date: 31 Dec 1992 18:34:45 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: globie.caltech.edu

In article <1992Dec31.083750.13546@netcom.com> dani@netcom.com (Dani Zweig) writes:
>dvandom@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Dave Van Domelen):
>>Who's the green dude?  Pulsar Stargrave?
>I wondered about that:  The skin color is right, but the nose is wrong. :-)

J'onn J'onzz?  How long -do- Martians live?

				--Kynn
From: ian@airs.com (Ian Lance Taylor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: Re: Nomad #8
Date: 1 Jan 93 06:43:58 GMT
Organization: Infinity Development, Waltham, MA

panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Elizabeth Holden) writes:

>ejs16@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Eric Jaron Stieglitz) writes:

>> Does anyone know who did the art and writing on Nomad #8?
>> 
>Good question!  I've been wondering this too, as I'm trying to catalogue 
>that issue.  Is the artist Pat Olliffe?

>Why were there no credits?  Just to drive us crazy?

I noticed that there were no credits on the issue when I read it,
something I normally probably wouldn't notice, because I specifically
checked because the issue was potentially controversial.

So maybe that's why.  Or maybe they just forgot.

Anyhow, it's clearly written by Fabien Nicieza and pencilled by Pat
Oliffe (can't miss those Neal Adams riffs--check out the face on page
six).  I've never been able to recognize inkers, though.
-- 
Ian Lance Taylor                ian@airs.com         uunet!cygint!airs!ian
First person to identify this quote wins a free e-mail message:
``That is a fine analogy.  Its only fault is its unintelligibility.''
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: lab@pollux (Lab Administrator)
Subject: IMAGE: Shadowhawk 2
Organization: University of Georgia
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 08:29:46 GMT


Holy, moley!  I'm loathe to do this, but I just HAD to post a message
as a kind of catharsis.  I read "Shadowhawk 2" about four days ago (i
haven't read number 1) and I'm still trying to get the taste out of my
mouth.

This is the WORST comic I have ever read.  I can't begin to describe how
bad it was.  Oh, it was lame, offensive even.  If you haven't read it yet,
DON'T.  If you have, feel free to join me in trashing this rag!

In other words, I didn't like it very much.  Thanks for hearing me out...
Chuck Jordan

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: mcmahan@cs.unca.edu (Scott McMahan -- Genesis mailing list owner)
Subject: IMAGE: WildCATS #3...!
Organization: University of North Carolina at Asheville
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 22:43:45 GMT

Image, ya gotta love it. They make good comics :)

WC #3 is no exception. Image, at least Jim Lee, is responding to the
flak about late, late, late, late comics by splitting the final
WC limited series into two issues, #3 and #4. (#4 is to have
new artwork by new talents submitting to Homage Studios as well as a
preview of Larry Stroman's _Tribe_ for Image.)

#4 is gonna be polly-wolly-doodle bagged with a limited edition
topps trading card by Lee.

#3 was great -- the story continues as 400,000 characters mix it
up in a brawl. Added to this are some Youngblood characters. The
result is a lot of fighting. I can't really remember who all these
people are. At the end, the good guys -- *all* of them -- lie defeated
as the Evil Person (I *love* the Evil Person, whose name escapes
me, best visual evil guy I think I've ever seen) gloats. YB, trying
to protect Dan Quayle -- why they're doing this is a mystery, it is
Dan Quayle after all! -- who is really an impostor fight WC, and
the Evil Person's flunkies fight everyone. This plot smacks of
Chris Claremont to me.

As always, the plot takes a back seat to the art. It's nice to see
Jim Lee drawing Youngblood -- they're pretty darn impressive
with him. Each panel is suitable for framing. The cover is inked
by Rob Liefeld, re-inforcing my belief he should be an inker and not
a penciler/writer/etc. Beautiful colors throughout.

Well, it's a great book and you should get it, for the increase
in value if nothing else. #4 will be a must-get for everyone, 
Lee fans, WC fans, speculators, and people who need plastic bags
to suffocate things with.

Scott



Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: friedman@python.cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark "Crimson" Friedman)
Subject: Re: The Uncanny Malcolm X-Man
Keywords: This is NOT an xbooks question...
Organization: NAIVE - New And Improved Virtual Environment
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 19:53:34 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.184621.15029@netcom.com> solovay@netcom.com (Andrew Solovay) writes:
>I'm psyched for the Jesus(TM)--John the Baptist(TM) crossover
>("My Apostle--My Enemy"(TM)).  They spend the first five pages
>fighting, then they realize they're both good guys, and go off
>and trash Satan(TM).  Good solid Marvel fare.

Yeah, I hear John(TM) tries to drown Jesus(TM) in the river, but no
dice: the little bugger just seems to have the odd tendency to float
on top of the water!  One of His(TM) mutant powers, methinks...

Yup, it's Jesus(TM): The Original Superhero!  Heck, he had sharp
spikes coming out of his hands *long* before Wolverine did.

							- Mark

For those of you who (God forbid) missed it... --> ;-)

-- 
Mark "Klone Crimson" Friedman is friedman@cis.ohio-state.edu .................
"There is nothing former  "Beat poets,    "Bite me,   "My jacket! I killed
 about King Crimson."      not children."  it's fun!"  Kennedy in this jacket!"
 - Robert Fripp, 5/11/90   - anonymous     - MST3K     - Ron Post
Xref: sparky rec.arts.comics.misc:10126 alt.comics.lnh:270
From: branwen@cerebus.ccc.amdahl.com (Karen Williams)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc,alt.comics.lnh
Subject: Re: Favorite Writers
Date: 22 Dec 92 19:07:30 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <2B3747F7.5F32@tct.com> chip@tct.com (Chip Salzenberg) writes:
>What, no Peter David?

No. That would be sucking up. :-)

--
                                          Karen Williams
                                          branwen@cerebus.ras.amdahl.com
"Don't whine. Warrior women speak in a husky whisper."
  -- Brat Pack #3
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (JKF)
Subject: Re: SANDMAN:Lucien's Library
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 16:08:14 GMT

In article <8248@news.duke.edu> eja@carr3.acpub.duke.edu (Eric Akawie) writes:
>
>Sorry if this has been tlked about before and I missed it but it seemed like 
>a fun topic to me.
>
>What books do YOU want to read out of Lucien's Library.  Let's assume
>he's got a comic book section and an AV department too.
>

JLA vs. the Avengers.


Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
From: lsmith@mega.cs.umn.edu (Lance "Squiddie" Smith)
Subject: Re: SANDMAN: New Years with Delirium (Maybe some spoilers)
Keywords: confetti noise makers champagne Endless stuff like that
Organization: Minty Fresh Squids of the Poor
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 22:48:30 GMT

In article <1993Jan1.153851.8487@zip.eecs.umich.edu> tyg@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Tom Galloway) writes:
>In article <C05K3r.9D2@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca> jwtlai@jeeves.uwaterloo.ca (Jim W "GrimJim" Lai) writes:
>>>In rec.arts.comics.misc lsmith@myria.cs.umn.edu (Lance "Squiddie" Smith) writes:
>>>>- Tempus Frangit. Time stops or time shatters or time breaks? Anyone have
>>frango: vt. break, shatter, wreck, crush, grind; (fig.) break down, weaken,
>
>And here I thought it meant that since moving to the Midwest Neil had 
>discovered Frango mints and was musing that it was time for one.

Ah yes, Don't forget Destruction comments back in Sandman #44:

"Aeon after aeon. From the dawn days when time was Frango mints. And how 
 much longer?"

Of course, you would have to remind me of Frango mints on New Years Day,
when all the Dayton stores are closed...

----------------------------
  Lance "Cr2O3.2H2O" Smith | "Police report the scene of the crime was 
    (lsmith@cs.umn.edu)    |  covered with peanut shells and that the words 
  Member of the Alligator  |  'Helter Skelter' were written on walls with 
    Chess Bully Society    |  peanut butter."     _Mr Peanut in Hollywood_
From: Canevitl@utkvx3.utk.edu (Canevit, Craig E.)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc
Subject: DC: Swamp Thing and Daxamites
Date: 2 Jan 93 01:18:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Tennessee Computing Center
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


	I have seen a reference recently to a story in ST concerning
Daxam or Daxamites. Did I hear wrong, or is this any sort of major
story for Valor fans? Is Lar Gand involved? should this be included 
in the Omnicom Project?
	--Craig E. Canevit
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.misc