HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo)
Subject: Re: DOOL
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 92 20:29:26 GMT

In article <1992Apr2.193312.25369@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:
>In article <1992Apr1.184005.28640@csun.edu> vectr01c@VAX.CSUN.EDU writes:
>>In article <1992Apr1.012039.29375@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:
>>>
>>>Hmmmm, can't get me off of your mind, huh Gail?  ;-)
>>
>>Aren't you forgetting that your alter ego is "Rob" -- not "Lawrence"?  I 
>>wouldn't say Rob is exactly a smoothie!   :)   I know I'd never have been 
>>taken in by Rob!
>
>NO, my alter ego is neither Rob nor Lawrence.  It's Chip!!!  Rob just gives
>me pointers from time to time.  :-)  So, Julie-uh, Gail, would you fall for
>Chip?  

Now, now, Timmy -- we *all* know you'd love to think your alter ego is
Chip but really...we know better...you and Rob are twins across some 
bizarre 4th dimension!  Just face facts.  

Joanna.

| \____ ----- ____/           | HAPPYNET Disclaimer: This disclaimer is not |
|      ( o o )                | required by Leader Kibo.  This article does |
|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    | not necessarily represent the opinions of   |
|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! | Leader Kibo.  Have a nice day.              |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: tac@moe.SanDiego.NCR.COM (C. Corvin)
Subject: Re: Y&R
Reply-To: tac@moe.SanDiego.NCR.COM (C. Corvin)
Organization: NCR Corp. E & M San Diego
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 19:40:38 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.010525.18908@cbfsb.cb.att.com> petrocco@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (ron.petrocco) writes:
>>In article <kaschenb.703201153@sfu.ca> kaschenb@fraser.sfu.ca (Kevin) writes:
>>
>>Hey, did anyone else think that what the lab-tech 
>>guy said as he walked into the lab on Monday's show
>>was hilarious...and corny?  He said something like:
>>"Hello, Dr.Granger, I'm from the labtech company and
>>I've come to take blood from you and your family"
>>I nearly fell off my chair when I heard it...it just
>>struck me as being a really weird thing to say.  Did 
>>anyone else think this, or am I letting my exam
>>stress get to me again?
>>Kevin
>>(kaschenb@sfu.ca)
>
>I've heard technicians use those terms often.
>
>The question I have is:
>
>HOW ARE VICTORIA AND RYAN GOING TO GET MARRIED IF SHE
>DOESN'T WANT SEX?????
>
>No wisecracks, guys!!
>
>Adelle (on Ron's account)


And doesn't she need parental consent since she is a minor???

                         tina


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: stapleto@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Kathy Stapleton)
Subject: Re: DOOL -- Thursday (4/9)
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 05:13:55 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.200049.14163@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> millersa@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Stacy Miller) writes:
>stapleto@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Kathy Stapleton) writes:
>
>>     And ya'll who think that Viv is dear old Larry's ma....well, when
>>Carleeeeeee asked for advice on "Oh dear friend, dear confidant of
>>mine, why shouldn't I tell Bo???????" (please get real, can't she tell
>>that Viv's really her enemy or is Carleeeeeeee that Dense???  Wait I
>>shouldn't even have to ask that question.) Viv all of a sudden got
>>this look on her face about this TERRIBLE secret she kept from her
>>husband/boyfriend whatever and how it broke them apart.  It almost
>>seemed obvious that she had an affair with Larry's dad  and somehow
>>had Larry...esp since today she mentioned to Larry that she and Lar
>>are "two of a kind."
>
>I don't think that she could have an affair with Leopold as he was her brother.
>But I started thinking that maybe the man she was referring to was Stephano.
>If her secret was about pretending Forrest was dead but actually he was alive,
>and had she told that to Stephano, that would explain how Stephano got a hold
>of John.
>


     The theories floating around about how John and Lawrence could
have been given two lockets is feasible!!!!  But if John is Larry's
brother, then why does he have the picture of Carleeee in his burnt
bag?  Or is that a picture of Carly's mother?  (was that floating
around the net as well?)  I would think that John could be Carly's
other brother?

     How about this.... the secret that Vivian held back for so many
years is that she had an affair with Carly's dad and her daughter *is*
Carly ....and the reason why she doesn't want Carly invovled with
Larry is because Viv is really selfish and doesn't want her daughter
to get all the inheritance...but instead wants it from her dear
nephew.

     Ok, ok, I'm reaching, but it's a thought!!! :)

>				Stacy

     Grapefruit :)


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: roxy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (r.prisco)
Subject: Re: ATWT - oh happy day!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 16:54:03 GMT


Sal-our-Gal, welcome back .... I simply haven't got the time to follow up on
all your insights but it's great having you here again .... and you do look
lovely in that monokini ... all the people tell me so!!!

And welcome back to Adelle (we saw you!) and Gilbie and BabyDoll and everyone
else.  Sigh.  It's like coming home .....


________________________________________________________________________
           _     __ 
          (_)   |  |
 ___  __  ____ _|  |_  ____     _   Tell me when can a woman find any 
 |  |/  \ |  | |_  _| |_   \   (_)  kind of peace
 |  | \_/ |  |  |  |  / /|  |       When does the fury and the agony
 |  |     |  |  |  | |  \|  |   _   cease
 |__|     |__|  |__|  \___^_|  (_)  How long have I got to say please...
         att!mtfme!rita                             Melissa Etheridge   
________________________________________________________________________
From: marks@skat.usc.edu (Louise Marks)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: OLTL Update for Friday, 4/3/92
Date: 8 Apr 1992 13:31:17 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: skat.usc.edu

slewis@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Sarah L Lewis) writes:

>In article <ku66iuINNdhn@skat.usc.edu> marks@skat.usc.edu (Louise Marks) writes:


>>First Net theory:  Since Carlo cried "You broke my heart!" when he
>>killed the guy in the garage, I figure it has to be someone close to
>>him.  My candidate:  his brother, Stephanie's father.

>Hm, I thought the only reason that Stephanie was sent to live with Carlo
>in the first place was because both her parents died in Switzerland.  Why
>would Carlo have taken her in otherwise?

>Sarah
>slewis@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu

You're right.

As I remember, Stephanie lived in Europe with her father (her mother
had died sometime previously).  When he died, she came to live with
her Uncle Carlo.

At that time, I think they said her father died in a car accident,
which doesn't fit my theory.  However, what strikes me is the timing.
I think Stephanie showed up in Llanview shortly after Sara was
kidnapped (anyone remember for sure?). 

Admittedly, for my theory to be true, the writers would have to fudge
a little bit -- which we know NEVER happens in soaps!  :-). For example:
Stephanie was in boarding school in Europe but her father died while
on a trip in the US (Carlo used his connections to falsify the cause
of death). 

OH MY GOD. I'M STARTING TO THINK LIKE A SOAP WRITER.  PLEASE,
SOMEONE DO SOMETHING BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!!!

I'm also influenced by non-storyline information: When Carlo and
Stephanie supposedly moved to California, Robin Griggs, who plays
Stephanie, was terminated from the show, while Thom Christopher
(Carlo) wasn't.  I was really surprised when they brought her back
last month.  Now that she's seen the "Scarecrow" file, listened to the
tapes, and possibly recognized her father's voice, I think maybe she
was brought back to be the murderer.


Oh well, it's fun to speculate.  Anyone ready with Net Theory #2?

-- 
  /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  / Louise Marks                          Internet: marks@skat.usc.edu    /
  / University of Southern California     BITNET:   marks@uscvm           /
  /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Michelle L. Zafron)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Godzilla Speaks Update (c) 920327
Date: 5 Apr 92 20:29:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <12219@umd5.umd.edu>, kerry@is-next.umd.edu (Kerry Ogata) writes...
>In article <1992Mar29.202427.4876@ddsw1.MCS.COM> starkid@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Lance Sanders) writes:

(Lance's hysterical description of Galen2's attempted seduction deleted) 

>>   Ok, ok, it was funny. And if that had been Courtney Eplin delivering the 
>>lines, I would have been bouncing off the walls. But this new dame makes me 
>>wanna hurl. "She's not worthy."    [Brumpt-TING!]

>I thought this whole scene was excruciating!  My friend and I were groaning
>throught the whole thing.  Could this woman have been any more predatory?!
>Maybe it was because it was a new actress, but I found it *totally*
>unbelievable!  I sure hope they don't do too many more love scenes--it was
>more funny than seductive!

The jury's still out on the new Galen.  I gave Eplin several weeks and I'll give
this actress the same.  A couple of things though, Eplin read her lines with
the emotion of a tax lawyer and the intelligence of a Congressman, I'm not too
sorry to see her go.  Maybe this actress took up where Eplin's Galen was 
supposedly headed (I did get the impression that Galen was interested in 
Trevor).  Or maybe the director wanted to distance the new Galen from Eplin's
monotone intonation and got the actress (what is her name?) to EMOTE and ATTACK.

>kerry@is-next.umd.edu or kogata@wam.umd.edu
--Michelle L. Zafron (v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Suppose that you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress.  But
 I repeat myself."
                                 --Mark Twain   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: vectrgsj@VAX.CSUN.EDU (GSAIDJOHNSON)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Dani and Dem Strawberries
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:59:26 GMT
 <1992Apr7.124819.13810@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <1992Apr7.164319.21103@athena.cs.uga.edu>,<1992Apr10.170538.23118@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
Reply-To: vectrgsj@VAX.CSUN.EDU
Organization: Cal State Northridge

In article <1992Apr10.170538.23118@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:
>In article <1992Apr7.164319.21103@athena.cs.uga.edu> stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Cat Stanton) writes:
>>In article <1992Apr7.124819.13810@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:
>
>What I don't like is that they are making her out to be a fool for not
>suspecting John of being up to something.  Or maybe she does suspect
>and we just don't know yet?  I did like that we're seeing a more sensitive
>side of her, ie the scene with her mother.  [Did anyone else think there
>seemed to be a very large age difference for them to be mother/daughter?]

Yes, but not impossible.

>Deborah Moore acted very well in this scene and I felt like the tears
>were real.  Compare this to Icky's tears earlier [yesterday?] which were
>VERY fake.  Someone should tell Staci that when the makeup guy comes and
>squirts water in your eye it means you are supposed to be crying.  She
>was like just standing there with water streaming down her face, but 
>didn't act like a person that was crying.  Oh well.

Sorry, I didn't find Isabella's crying scene unbelievable.

>|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |

			  __.        |
			 /  |  __. . |
			(__/|/(_/|_|_|__)
			   /| Gail Said Johnson - gsaidjohnson@vax.csun.edu
			  (_/ California State University, Northridge*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   *This posting, of course, has nothing whatever to do with the university.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: n8243057@henson.cc.wwu.edu (NSFosberg)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: Lorna's parents
Keywords: Lorna, Felicia, Lucas, Cass
Date: 14 Apr 92 20:47:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: henson.1992Apr14.204715.11350
Organization: Western Washington University

cass as lorna's father: well, since cass is barely old enough to
be an acceptable candidate for jenna's dad, and lorna is obviously
a few years older than her (although on a soap, you never know), it
seems very unlikely that cass could be her father.

i keep waiting for lucas or felicia to notice that ring she gave matt.
he's still wearing it, and they've included some shots of him fiddling
with it recently.  so, it seems a reasonable assumption that it's the
ring lucas gave his daughter before she was adopted.

-=nsf=-
From: TANTS@DTPVX2.NCIFCRF.GOV ("Tants, Rebecca E.")
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL: Mindy the super Cracker/Lock-picker
Date: 7 Apr 92 15:17:00 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.235005.21527@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> you write:
>In a previous article, TANTS@DTPVX2.NCIFCRF.GOV ("Tants, Rebecca E.") says:
>2) So WHAT if Alexandra is Nick's mother?  What's so horrible about that?
>I don't think Alexandra wants to replace Nick's "parents."  She just wants
>to be part of Nick's life.  And, depriving that of a mother is wicked and

You're being much too nice to Alex.  Alex wants to OWN Nick.  To her, the
fact that Kip and Mary raised Nick is irrelevent.  He's her son and should
forget all about that.

I'm adopted.  and people ask me a lot about my natural parents.  i don't
know them and don't really care to.  My parents are the people who raised
me, regardless of whose genetic imprint I received.  Now, if NICK and Mindy
could get a grip on that, there wouldn't be half as much trouble here.  then
again, it wouldn't be a soap...

>cruel, no matter what you think of Alex.  I mean, SHEESH.  Mindy DID sleep
>with Alex's husband.  I think Alex has every right to be angry with Mindy.
>and, I don't think Mindy has the right to withold this kind of information
>from either Alex OR Nick.  They both deserve to know.  Sure, it might be

no mindy didn't have the right to withhold that info.  that i agree with.

>a little painful for Nick at first.  But, he'll get over it.  He shouldn't
>be deprived of his mother's love.  And, it's not going to change the fact
>that Kip and Mary were wonderful parents to Nick.  I'm sure they'll be in
>his heart forever.  I mean, it really doesn't matter about the biology, 
>because there were deeper emotional things.  Mimbo is REALLY overreacting
>about this whole situation.

please.  This is hard for nick because, if Alex and Eric are his parents
that invalidates everything he believes about his parents.  I mean, i know
i was adopted.  Nick doesn't.  there's a lie there.  He all but worships
his parents, so he's not going to accept this easily.

and it WILL come out eventually...and he'll be even madder at Mindy for
keeping it from him (great way to break them up when the time comes...)

Becki
From: beth@mips.com (Beth Van Eman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: writer's lurking (SOs)???
Date: 15 Apr 1992 17:06:17 GMT
Organization: MIPS Computer Systems, Sunnyvale, California
NNTP-Posting-Host: ralph.mips.com

In article <1992Apr15.061224.16395@casbah.acns.nwu.edu> kelsey@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Chris Kelsey) writes:
>In article <kubi2vINNss7@spim.mips.com> beth@mips.com (Beth Van Eman)
>writes, in response to someone else thinkingwriters are lurking
>because they used the term SO...
>
>>
>>I think Significant Other is fairly common, but maybe that's because
>>I'm from California. :-)    I'm pretty sure I've had that expression
>>in my vocabulary since gosh, at least '83.  But I noticed Opal referred
>>to Palmer as her "Better Half" and to me that seemed like proof since
>>I've not heard many people use that expression except here on the net.
>
>sorry, beth -- this is an oldie moldie getting resurrected...  it's been
>around at least since the 50's...   was used by wives (seriously?!?)
>to refer to "hubby" (at least in public!); sarcastically by men in front
>of their wives.  check out some movies, and newspaper cartoons, of the 
>times... or ask anyone over 30.  having opal use the term is perfect!

But, but, but, I *am* over 30! :-)   What I really meant was, I haven't
heard "real" people use this term.   I thought someone on the net here
made a joke about it (because it sometimes stands for Butt Head), and
we all just continued to use it.    Like I said though, maybe it depends
on what crowd you run with. :-)

>SO is late 60's/early 70's, when the term was coined to identify the 
>relationship between cohabitating but not married (gasp! shock!) couples.

I call mine "my fellow sinner" and I wear a "living-in-sin band" on
my left ring finger. :-)   I think he sometimes refers to me as his
"co-mortgagee" but I find that a tongue-twister. :-)   We're so romantic... 
:-)

-Beth
beth@mips.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GL Trivia!
From: matthew@oread.cc.ukans.edu
Date: 12 Apr 92 01:28:40 CST
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Serces

In article <1992Apr9.200016.3158@midway.uchicago.edu>, admn@quads.uchicago.edu (Kent D. Boklan) writes:
> To placate Donald (no doubt an Herculean labour!) I have written up a few
> 
>                  GUIDING LIGHT TRIVIA QUESTIONS. 
> 
> I do hope that they prove both challenging and entertaining (and no blatant
> corruption is evident). I am, of course, indebted to the lovely and talented
> Sher Crain for originating this premise in this forum, and the (nigh upon)
> lovely and talented Donald Schwartz for his efforts.
> 
> 2. Who was framed by Guillermo Ibarra for kidnapping Marah?

	Sonni Carrera

	Interesting questions--notice I only answered one....  :-)
				--Matt
-- 
Matt Chatterly               |   "How'd you get hand lotion all the
(a blatant pseudonym.....)   |    way up there?"
Matthew@oread.cc.ukans.edu   |   "I told you I spilled it...."
					--_Young Lady Chatterly_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: wolcott@smiley.mitre.org (Dawn Wolcott)
Subject: Re: DOOL:  TAN:  The 50 States
Keywords: someone is bored
Organization: The MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 17:52:10 GMT

>In article <1992Apr3.152356.9845@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:
>>I was just wondering if we had at least one person from each of the
>>50 states in our little group.  Who cares, right?  Well, pretend you
>>do.  :)   Here is what I can come up with myself....
>>

Virginia - Dawn Wolcott
From: shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AW
Date: 15 Apr 92 22:43:15 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

txap3@isuvax.iastate.edu writes:

>I was thinking.  It is still possible that the baby is Sam's.  After all, how
>would Olivia know already that it isn't.  She may have told him the baby 
>wasn't his so she didn't have to deal with him anymore, or to make him feel
>better.  Whatever.  Or maybe she just doesn't know.

She always knew that the baby wasn't Sam's.  She is due on August 18th
(I think that's what she said). She also said that was exactly nine
months after she spent the night with Dennis, which was at least 2
months after the last time she slept with Sam.

We always knew almost from the start that the baby wasn't Sams because Aunt
Liz found out a long time ago.

I like the idea that Dennis is the father.  Interesting twist.  
-- 
Susan R. Hagan (shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu) 
Publications Coordinator - User Services
Rutgers University Computing Services
From: robson@deneb.cis.udel.edu (Janice Robson)
Subject: Re: ATWT: 4-3 FridayJeepUpdate
Organization: University of Delaware, Newark
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 18:25:28 GMT

In article <9204061626.AA22704@helpseq.us.oracle.com> jmeranda@us.oracle.com (John Meranda) writes:
>Hiya everybody! Here's the happs on Fridays' ATWT episode.



>Jury selection for CabinCruisers trial continues.  Babs is there 
>with her ring on.  He asks her to always be there for him. She's
>looking pretty bummed, but tries to hide it.
>Later she tells  Fargone (I think) that she doesn't know how much
>longer she can take all this.

I don't know how much longer I can take this either! Come on already!
TELL THE BLASTED TRUTH!! I think Babs is making this all much worse
by lying about Cabin being the father of JennyDarryl.  What can she
possibly gain by this?  Frantic will be much more angry when she learns
that Babs has lied twice!! We all know how important HONESTY is with
these people!  Actually I think that the "Honesty is the most important
thing, blah, blah, blah..." line is the most overused line in this
soap.  If Babs is spineless enough to let Cabin blackmail her,
then she deserves whatever she has got coming to her!! She use to
be such a strong character, what have they done to her?


  
>Earlier, Anus talked to H2D, and told him that he overheard Court'me
>and getEven talking, and now he knows they are sleeping together.
>Later, H2D tells Frantic about it.

Just who the h*ll's business is this besides Court'me and getEven's????
If H2D is so interested in discussing who is sleeping together in this town and
then blabbing about it to his wife, then he ought to first confess who 
he has slept with!  
 
>Anus runs into Court'me (at school, I think) and questions her.
>"You're sleeping with GetEven, arent you? AREN'T YOU?"

He really needs to GET A LIFE!

>Cut to M&A. Merciless is there to see her beloved (?) husband.
>....and in walks Gregory!   Seems  he's there to interview with
>M&A for their new executive position.

Yeah! Things were getting a little to dull with Merciless. Now
let's really see her squirm. I really like the spice this 
actress' role has brought to this soap. 

Great update Jeep!

janice

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: lgeschwe@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Laura E Geschwender)
Subject: ATWT:  Bets on Chairo's murderer
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 21:11:10 GMT

  I'm a lurker who really enjoys listening in on the goings-ons of the Ward, 
but I can't *resist* keeping my nose out this time.  I've had my suspicions 
about who Chairolyn's murder is for quite a while now (even before DocSam 
suggested this person), and I have this feeling that maybe by April 15th all 
will be revealed, so I want to be sure to broadcast my bet to the world 
before then (so I can publicly fall flat on my face...)  ;-)
  A long time ago, the show was focusing quite a bit on Jade and her unrequited
love for Gavin.  *My* bet is that Jade killed Chairo and Nate (?  ...whoever 
her dad is...) to protect Gavin.  She would be the perfect surprise villian 
(sort of like Hal's girlfriend was in that murder a number of years ago!), 
because you know that Deero, Gavin, H2D, etc. are too obvious.  I think DocSam 
suggested this a while back, and I thought "Yes, yes!  That's what I've been 
thinking, too!", and I expected it to cause quite a stir on the net.  It was 
immediately dismissed, though, so I'm going to reincarnate the suggestion.  
Anyway, I have been known to be way off base many o' time, so I'm prepared to 
take the rap when I end up being so again.  I just thought it would be fun to 
toss in my suggestion.

                 LEG@osu