HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sllvg@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: ST-TNG season opener-when?
Date: 15 Sep 92 15:39:46 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

Could someone tell me when this season's Star Trek, The Next Generation
shows are going to start, and on what channel (CBS, ABC, etc.).  I've
just recently started watching the reruns of the show that are shown in
my area and have turned into quite a fan.  I'd also like any info on
this new show I've heard about:  Deep 'something' Nine.  I heard it will
be starting in January.  Does anyone know when exactly and on what 
channel.  I don't get much of a chance at all to read this newsgroup, so
any e-mail will be appreciated.
       Thanks,                    B-miester

Xref: sparky rec.arts.startrek.current:12764 talk.politics.soviet:7769
From: tom@europa.lonestar.org (Tom Kimball)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,talk.politics.soviet
Subject: Leningrad reference in Star Trek 4
Date: 8 Sep 92 03:58:09 GMT
Organization: Moria Mining Guild (BBS) -- Dallas, Texas, USA

In article <8358@orbit.cts.com> dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Stephen Dowling) writes:
>Just bought ST4:TVH on sale at the video store ... I notice YATI that no one
>could have anticipated.
>
>"Alien Communications Officer" (Jane Wiedlin?) is giving the weather reports
>from around Earth, and includes "Leningrad."  Maybe sometime in the future,
>the people of St. Petersburg will get nostalgic and change the name ... again.

Hopefully not...and I doubt it.

>Of course, this is not criticism.  Just another reminder of some institutions
>that haven't outlasted Star Trek.

I think this is sloppy writing and they SHOULD have known better.  I noticed
the reference to Leningrad the first day Star Trek 4 was released in 
November 1986 and immediately realized they made a mistake.  At the time I 
thought to myself "There is no way that city will still be named Leningrad 
300 years from now.  Lenin will have been discredited by then."  I 
must say, however, that I never would have thought the name would be changed a 
mere five years later.  I also thought the city would be renamed Petrograd
rather than St. Petersburg.  That was the name of the city immediately 
preceding the change to Leningrad (1914-1922).

-- 
Tom Kimball  			tom@europa.lerctr.org    
tom@europa.lonestar.org		tom%europa@egsner.cirr.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com (PuterDude)
Subject: Re: STVI
Organization: Organized? Just look at my desk!
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 14:10:42 GMT

 cmiller@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Catherine Miller) asks an unheard of...

>In one episode of ST:TNG, I heard Troi referred to as "Sir".  Does any
>one know why "sir" instead of "ma'am"?0

Hi Catherine,
	I'm surprised that with the subject line, that you mentioned
Troi being called 'sir', and not the character that was played by Kim
Cattrall(sp) in STVI. Also, this subject has been blasted for the last
few days, and I am surprised that you missed it. Maybe it should be
included in a FAQ.
	Anyway, "sir" is a gender *nuetral* way of showing respect for
higher rank. Nothing more. It is *not* used in the masculine in this
case. ST:TNG is just being "politically correct" again. Just as it did
by changing the word "man" to the word "one" in the opening monolog.

Hope this helps...

-- 
Puter	puter@no1home.nashvil.ingr.com	.sig by Generic Labels
(Put irritating title here)		(Put phone # here.)
(Put obnoxious quote here. Please make it as long as possible.)
From: dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Stephen Dowling)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Why San Francisco?
Date: 8 Sep 92 09:25:08 GMT
Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN.

jcm3r@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Spaceman SPiff) responds:
>  Wasn't the UN founded in San Fancisco?

Indeed, it was.  And SF remains a center for international diplomacy ... the
USSR kept a high-profile consulate there.  I'm not sure if the Russians are
keeping it up.
 
steve dowling
dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: ST: TNG- The Next Phase
Date: 9 Sep 92 20:24:52 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout

In article <8SEP199210281057@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov> goldberg@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov (Patti Twigg) writes:
<Hi. Not meaning to start a discussion already done to death,
<but, over the weekend I was watching this episode with my
<6 year old daughter. About half way through she turns to me
<and says, 'but mommy, why don't they just fall through the
<floor?'. After having read all the discussion when the episode
<first aired, I almost fell through the floor laughing. 8-)

When a 6-year-old kid can notice this big of a plot loop-hole, it is time
for the writers to do a little more thinking next time.

You should put this info in a letter and send it to Rick Berman.
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
From: Laura_Halliday@mindlink.bc.ca (Laura Halliday)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Why San Francisco?
Date: 6 Sep 92 23:09:51 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: world

San Francisco has unique geography, so we recognize the `exterior' shots
immediately, and know exactly where in San Francisco they are. San Francisco
has an atmosphere and mythology (played up in the Dixon Hill episodes) that few
other cities have.

A few other cities have the atmosphere (e.g. New Orleans), but I suspect more
people would recognize the Golden Gate Bridge than the Lake Pontchartrain
Causeway...

I personally find San Francisco to be an illogical (if delightful) choice.
Starfleet is clearly derived from 20th century organizations, so how did
Starfleet's headquarters get so far away from New York (U.N.) or Houston and/or
Cape Canaveral (NASA)?

...laura
From: ccspjs@gdr.bath.ac.uk (Pete J Suters)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: STNG Unification??
Date: 10 Sep 92 10:00:45 GMT
Organization: Bath University Computing Services, UK

In article <25668@castle.ed.ac.uk> sss@castle.ed.ac.uk (S S Sturrock) writes:
>
>Unification is not a movie although it has been released in the UK as such,
>and also Australia I assume, what you are seeing is a two part episode from
>season 5 of TNG.
>

  I didn't realise that Unification has been released over here in
Britain.  I've been looking for it, but couldn't find anywhere that
sold it.  Where is it available.

pete j suters ---- bath university ---- email: p.j.suters@uk.ac.swurcc 
 ___  ___    /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|___)   |   /  "Oh no, no, no!  It's all getting a bit tricky again!"
|       |  /          -- The Mary Whitehouse Experience
     (_/  /=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: steve@sep.Stanford.EDU (Steve Cole)
Subject: Re: Deep Space Nine News
Organization: Stanford Exploration Project
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 23:30:46 GMT

In article <BuBznD.98r@apollo.hp.com>, arnold@apollo.hp.com (Ken Arnold) writes:
|> In article <8TiFqB2w165w@memalph.UUCP> system@memalph.UUCP (Woody Harper) writes:
|> >JADZIA DAX: Science Officer.  A Trill.
|> This will be a *hellaciously* hard part to act well (assuming, of course,
|> it is at all well written).  I hope they have an excellent actor -- I'll
|> give up any amount of "young, very atractive" if this is acted well.

Tough role. If the actor doesn't perform well, his/her replacement
can easily be explained, as in "The Host".
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Cole  (steve@sep.stanford.edu, apple!sep!steve)
Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Subject: rec.arts.sf.tv new sf
Reply-To: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 11 Sep 92 11:53:50 EST

Subject: REC.ARTS.SF.TV New SF TV Series Info

>TERRY FARRELL (Lieutenant Jadzia Dax, the Trill science officer): Long list of
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Lieutenant Dax?  That wouldn't happen to be the same Crewman Dax from
the 23rd century, seen in Star Trek VI as the big-footed guy, would he?
:-)  (Hey, his race might be long-lived!)  Besides, weren't the trill
the "host" guys from the episode "The Host"?  He could've changed
bodies........


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jason Wong
Calling from Markham, Ontario CANADA.  It's not cold though!  :-)
INTERNET: bernie.wong@canrem.com


 * OLX 2.1 TD * I have an energy wave from 240, mark 6 port.  Valtane
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario, Canadas
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: eisimps@cie.uoregon.edu (Eileen Simpson)
Subject: Re: DS9 rumor
Summary: Field of DSN
Organization: University of Oregon Campus Information Exchange
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 09:06:37 GMT

In article <38039@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> rblewitt@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Richard Blewitt) writes:
>In article <i931053@pro-woolf.cts.com> bwoolf@pro-woolf.cts.com (Beverly Woolf) writes:
>>stop and think twice about losing control. He has a weakness for baseball,
>>a sport that died out in the 22nd century and he frequently goes to a
>>holo-suite to have a chat and a catch with one his legendary ballplayer 
>>heroes. 
>
>ACK!! Baseball died out in the 22nd century!??  And I thought Trek
>was supposed to represend a good future of mankind.
>
>Rick

Does anyone else think this sounds like Field of Dreams in space?

eyes.
From: pip@pro-freedom.cts.com (David Pipgras)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Rumor on Mr. Scott's Return....
Date: 13 Sep 92 07:55:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: pro-free.1992Sep13.005523.2186
Organization: ProLine [pro-freedom] AppleVan (Apple UG of Vancouver, WA)

Here is a rumor I heard on the return of Mr. Scott. It has been rumored
that he was on the USS Bozeman when it was caught in the cozality loop and
finally ended up in the 24th century...

This is the best idea I have heard for dropping scotty in the 24th season.

I also heard that he is to appear in something like 8 TNG episodes, before
going to DSN...

Can any of you net gods confirm this??

These are not my ideas, I just posted them for people who do not have
access...

Dave
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: ins314l@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Justin Keene)
Subject: STNG Unification??
Organization: Monash University
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 07:35:07 GMT


	I happened to have seen a preview for an up and coming STNG feature
film called Unification.  The preview was set in the STNG era and had
Spock in it (REAL old too).  Also appearing in it is Lt. Yar (spelling?) who
looked quite healthy considering I thought she was dead!!

Does anybody happen to have anymore info on this film?
I'm curious about how Yar got back into the Movie, and exactly how old
can Vulcans become??  
--
                                    ____
: ins314l@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au  / / /
:  glitch@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au   / / /
                             ____/ / /
                             \ \ \/ /    Friends don't let
                              \_\_\/     friends use MS-DOS!
From: dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Stephen Dowling)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: DS9 rumor
Date: 14 Sep 92 18:45:04 GMT
Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN.

tperreau@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (The Mad Scot) writes:
>In article <38039@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> rblewitt@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Richard Blewitt) writes:
>>In article <i931053@pro-woolf.cts.com> bwoolf@pro-woolf.cts.com (Beverly Woolf) writes:
>>>stop and think twice about losing control. He has a weakness for baseball,
>>>a sport that died out in the 22nd century and he frequently goes to a
>>>holo-suite to have a chat and a catch with one his legendary ballplayer 
>>>heroes. 
>>
>>ACK!! Baseball died out in the 22nd century!??  And I thought Trek
>>was supposed to represend a good future of mankind.
>
>Jeez, I hope that the Red Sox would finally win the World's Series by
>then :)

That's probably why it ends.
 
steve dowling
dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: pettypi@gaul.csd.uwo.ca (Carl Pettypiece)
Subject: Re: DSN Doctor: Amoros or Bashir??
Organization: Computer Science Dept., Univ. of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 05:58:55 GMT

>   Well, now that *spoilers* seem to be flying right and left
>about DSN, the contradictions will start coming as well.  Here's
>the first:  Two recent articles detailed the characters who
>will be in the show, but the articles disagree on the name of
>the Station's doctor.  One says it is Dr. Julian Amoros, the 
>other contends that it's Dr. Julain Bashir.
>   Does anyone know which is correct?  I'm assuming this could
>be due to a couple causes:
>                            1) Simple misinformation
>                            2) The doctor's name was changed...

                          or 3) They replace the doctor in season 2...
                                nah, they'd never do that!  (-:
>
>RC Carman


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Pettypiece (pettypi@gaul.csd.uwo.ca)        Disclaimer:  Hell, I don't
Department of Computer Science                   even know if these are MY
University of Western Ontario                    opinions!
From: exusing@exu.ericsson.se (Craig Singer,EXU/T/E)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: The Borg are here!!!
Date: 10 Sep 92 21:40:37 GMT
Reply-To: exusing@exu.ericsson.se
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc. Richardson, TX

A scan of the Dallas business yellow pages showed no Borg businesses, but
there was a listing that read simply "Bored Housewife ..... xxx-yyyy".   
You have to wonder. 

Politics is irrelevent
Football is relevant
The Dallas Cowboys assimilated the Redskins 23-10!

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
* Ericsson Network Systems           * "A Sprit With a Vision             *
* Richardson, TX USA                 * Is a Dream With a Mission"         *
* Craig Singer                       * - N. Peart                         *
* Above opinions (if any) are mine :)* Roll The Bones and Gig 'em Ags!!   *
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: dfrancis@tronsbox.xei.com (Dennis Heffernan)
Subject: Re: Romulans as Borg?
Organization: Xanadu Enterprises Inc.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 04:28:18 GMT

In article <neil.715946892@ccl.umist.ac.uk> neil@ccl.umist.ac.uk (Neil P.G.) writes:
|Which seems to suggest that, unless this DNA is *remarkably* similar
|to human DNA, Picard is a changed man...
|
	Hardly.  As you might expect, as soon as the Borg ship underwent
energetic indiscrete multidirectional disassembly, Dr. Crusher announced
that the DNA mutations were reversing.

	No, it doesn't make sense, but neither did much of anything else about
the Borg episodes.


dfrancis@tronsbox.xei.com   ...uunet!tronsbox!dfrancis     GEnie: D.HEFFERNAN1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I don't understand why you make such a big deal out of everything...haven't
you learned; if it's not happenning to me it's not important?" -Murphy Brown

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: nunn@sura.net (Deborah Nunn)
Subject: Re: RE: Warp Speed!
Organization: SURAnet, College Park, MD, USA, NA, Earth, Milky Way
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 21:19:49 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.213508.7871@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com> updike@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com writes:
>In article <8357@orbit.cts.com>, dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Stephen Dowling) writes:
>>
>>updike@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Todd F. Updike) writes:
>>>I've got to make one comment...
>>>I love this forum, but it is SO popular that it fills
>>>up so damn quickly !
>>
>>Agreed.  I hate to do it, but frequenly I end up scanning the "Subject"
>>string, reading the first message of a thread, and skipping the rest.
>> 
>>stephen dowling
>>dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org
>
>
>Hey folks, guess what, I discovered the command: "NEXT" (read next article).
>This makes life much easier!  You see, the reason I had initially complained
>about having to read all these articles was 'cuz I didn't know of these
>(and probably other time-saving commands); I had to keep hitting RETURN
>endlessly, in essence paging through each and every page of every article.
>What a royal pain in the rump this was !!!!!!!
>Especially for some of those 9 or 10 page articles !!!
>
>So now that I know of NEXT, it isn't nearly so irritating.
>PS, are there any other neat commmands that people can recommend me?

How about "KILL"?  If you don't like the subject heading, you just kill
all the articles with the heading.

>PPS, Is there supposed to be a rec.personals or *.personals group ??
>I would be interested in posting a "personals" ad, but on our system,
>there is no *.personals,  just things like *.personals.misc or .bondage,
>which, although I may be into during my one-unoccupeid-hand fantasies,
>I am not into in real life.

Yes, there is a personals group.  I suspect that if you get the .bondage
group, you get anything!  :-)  Don't know the full title at this
juncture, so I'll let you know later.
>
>- Todd


**************************************************************************
     ___/\           /\   One to beam up, Scottie!
  __/ *   \         / /     (My dogs made me say it!  Really!)
 |         |_______/ /
 /////               \    Deborah J. Nunn       | Snail mail:
      |              |    e-mail: nunn@sura.net | SURAnet    
      |    ______    |    phone: (301) 982-4600 | 8400 Baltimore Blvd.
      |___/      \___|    fax:   (301) 982-4605 | College Pk, MD 20740
From: matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Goodlooks debate on TNG
Date: 15 Sep 92 19:55:12 GMT
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder

In article <1992Sep12.114655.1@eagle.wesleyan.edu>, ahirsch@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:
> In article <2924830692.3.p00123@psilink.com>, "Seth M. Dworken" 
> <p00123@psilink.com> writes:
> 
>> You can talk "hotter" all you want - but when you get to 
>> "HOTTEST", you've seem to have forgotten ... MINUET!
> 
> Forgotten?  Naaah.  Just seemed a little too much like holo-porn for my tastes.
> (I know that _that_ thread has been beaten to death on alt.sex., so I'll leave
> it at that and save bandwidth...;)
> 
>> 
>> Of course the metamorph does have "special" talents...
> 
> Was it just me, or did the metamorph's race look a little like the aliens from
> _Alien Nation_?  At least in the spots, if not the fanatical fear of water...
> 
> No-one's mentioned Tasha, which is a grave oversight as far as female beauty on
> TNG goes.  Guinan still wins with me, though.  
> 
> Has the male contingent been getting better looking through the last three
> seasons?  Worf's hair is much better, Riker's beard ditto, Data, Picard on the
> cover of TV Guide as sexiest televised man, et al. During all this net-drooling
> over TNG, where are the men-interested folks, hmmmm?
> 
> 		Grasshopper
> 
> P.S. I may have missed these threads being gone all summer, but what's this
> rumour about a) Old Trek cast doing movie ST 7?  Grrrrr...
> 	     b) Projected limited number of seasons left for TNG?  3? 4?
> 	     c) Troi's Betazed accent covers a broad cockney accent?
>  
> ----- ---- ----- ---- --- ------ --- ----            --------------------------
> Craft your world from the things you love            ahirsch@eagle.wesleyan.edu


Grasshopper:

Yep, I thought of Alien Nation when I saw Kamala too (btw, Kamala is the name
of an Indian goddess of love/sex).  I wondered if the spots went down her back.
Also, yes there was a thread on best-looking men, but we man-watchers wisely
let it die a natural death instead of posting the same things over and over.
Someone did a survey, perhaps they could repost the results?  
Also, yes, Marina Sirtis does have a cockney accent, yes there is supposedly
only one or two more seasons of TNG, it is to be replaced by Deep Space Nine
(which title reminds me cringingly of Plan Nine from Outer Space), and 
yes good old Bill Shatner is trying to milk Paramount for one more sequel.
Whew!  Does that cover everything?

Kellie M-S
internet::matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu
From: rblewitt@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Richard Blewitt)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: DS9 rumor
Date: 15 Sep 92 08:37:23 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <8402@orbit.cts.com> dowling@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Stephen Dowling) writes:
>tperreau@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (The Mad Scot) writes:
>>In article <38039@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> rblewitt@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Richard Blewitt) writes:

>>>ACK!! Baseball died out in the 22nd century!??  And I thought Trek
>>>was supposed to represend a good future of mankind.

>>Jeez, I hope that the Red Sox would finally win the World's Series by
>>then :)

>That's probably why it ends.

Hmm, I thought it would take something much more drastic, like the
Cubs winning it all.  Something as likely to happen as Cubbie fans
saying that Wrigly is too old, and should be replaced with a dome.

Rick

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________.sig____________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
The generic .sig          Rick Blewitt     rblewitt@ucsd.edu
From: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: ST: TNG "The Next Phase" SPOILERS!!
Date: 6 Sep 92 00:15:26 GMT
Reply-To: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann)
Organization: University of Arizona

In article <1992Sep3.125510.8167@bnlux1.bnl.gov>, schroede@bnlux1 (gary l. schroeder) writes:
>
>Heh.  Just chalk this one up to another "unsolved mystery".  Didn't you
>know that it's easier to create a veiled mystery about a major
>character's past to increase their intrigue factor than to actually
>explain what that past might be?  TNG writers sure operate this way.
>Let's list them, shall we?
>
[good examples of the above deleted]

>-	What the hell did Ro do that was so godawful that they can't 
>	tell us about it?

I disagree on this one.  IMHO, if you watch the epsisode "Ensign Ro",
and *pay*attention*, everything is pretty much spelled out.  No, not
in we-saw-the-episode-on-screen detail, but I think there's not too
much mystery to what happened.

-- 
--- jumbo shrimp --- pretty ugly --- awfully nice --- constant change ---
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: eje47614@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Sir Tanon Drister)
Subject: ST-TNG last season?
Summary: Is it really their last season?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 07:47:12 GMT
Keywords: star trek the next generation

I'd heard from someone that the '92-'93 season was to be the last for Star Trek, the Next Gen.
The same source also said that they were to be replaced with something set on a space station.
Someone PLEASE tell me this is NOT true!

-- 
Most of this is memory now...			 - 'Roads to Madness'
I've gone too far to turn back now.	   from Queensryche's 'Warning'
I'm not quite what I thought I was,
but, then again, I may be more...		- Sir Tanon
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: rccarm00@mik.uky.edu (ron c carman)
Subject: Re: Plots for 2 shows
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 01:49:37 GMT

trw@spl1.spl.loral.com (Tim R Witort) writes:

>I missed a couple of episodes and need a brief plot description for:

>1) Imaginary Friend

>2) Cost of Living

     You didn't miss *much*...

RC Carman

--
/=======================================================================\ 
|       chronos              || 'What you want is irrelevant.           |
| rccarm00@mik.uky.edu       ||  What you have chosen is at hand.'      |
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~