HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jcc@frog.CRDS.COM (gallifrey)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: The world according to propeller-boy - part 1
Date: 12 Aug 92 16:08:55 GMT
Organization: CRDS

In article <1992Aug9.004750.8654@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>In article <1992Aug3.140330.25847@frog.CRDS.COM> jcc@frog.CRDS.COM (gallifrey) writes:

>> What you've said, so far:

>>  "Suzie tricked me into being an asswipe by posting an ambiguous and 
>>oh so tempting morsel.  I'm not malicious, I'm just too stupid to figure
>>out the alternatives in a two-choice situation".
>> "If she'll appoligize for triggering my idiocy, I'll appologize for being
>>an idiot".

>	A) There was no reason to be posting child abuse crap in t.a in the
>	   first place

 Indeed.   Trying to enlighten Forgach (or you, for that matter) -is-
beyond reason....but what the hell, the net is full of optimists.

  Here's what you've added:

  "I have a method I use when deciding how to follow up a post.  It's
 a faulty, stupid method that caused me to make a base accusation against
 an innocent victim, but it's the method I use.
  I see nothing wrong with this, but lots of people seem to be mad at me...
 (I think they're faking it, giant conspiracy against me don't you know),
 so I'll appologize even though it's still Garvin's fault".

[1] This is all, of course, after-the-fact back-pedaling bullshit.  You
took what Suzie('s SO) said out of context so you could get in a cheap
shot.  You know it.  I know it.  -Everyone- knows it.  Go ahead, deny
it some more, you worm.

>	B) There was no reason to inflict the thread on talk.abortion

 So.  Fucking.  What?   

 Kevin, if you don't like being paraded around the net stinking of shit, 
you really ought to quit smearing yourself with it....

Jim Chagnon    jcc@frog.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.bizarre,news.misc
From: rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama)
Subject: eniac subscribers
Followup-To: news.net.cop.kevin-darcy
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 14:30:51 GMT

Mejac is down.  Sorry for the delay.  Keep feeding each other.


					at that point trish, concerned
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.politics.guns
From: rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama)
Subject: Re: democratic platform
Followup-To: news.net-cops.kevin-darcy
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 07:20:04 GMT

In article <1992Aug14.234050.17419@cfctech.cfc.com> kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy) sucks up:
>Your continued use of Mr. Ezekiel's last name, in the manner he himself has 
>characterized as "rude", is both inappropriate AND hostile.

Well, if it isn't the net.idiot pontificating on the subjects
of rudeness and hostility.


---------------
    You have this amazing excess of emotional baggage and a
masochistic desire to be beaten like a drum, so you drag your
baggage all over the net, cross-posting where you know you
shouldn't, in order to air your angst to those who don't want
to hear it and get flamed because you want it.  You want it bad,
Darcy.  Crying and whining all over hell and creation are meat and
drink to you, and you have a near psycho-sexual need to be flamed
for your crying and whining.
				    -- dean.kaflowitz
				    <1991Dec27.131225.5984@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: neuhaus@acht.informatik.uni-kl.de (Stephan Neuhaus (HiWi Mattern))
Subject: Flame collector needs fundament
Organization: University of Kaiserslautern, Germany
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 15:14:56 GMT

Hello.

I am new to the net and I'd like to start a flame collection to show
off to the girls I'm going to meet.  So if you think that this post
or the poster are reasonably stupid, please mail (not post) a flame to

	neuhaus@informatik.uni-kl.de

Thanks for your consideration and general piss-off.


-- 
+------- No .sig? OH, COME ON! --------+-"The derivative snuggles  close to-+
| email:  neuhaus@informatik.uni-kl.de | the function---whatever to snuggle |
| snail mail: Stephan Neuhaus/Hilgard- | means; I'm too old for that"       |
| ring 32/6750 Kaiserslautern/Germany  |                       -- Math Prof |
Organization: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Wednesday, 12 Aug 1992 00:07:31 EST
From: Linda Birmingham <ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Franklin admits he's scared of women
 <92218.124206ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> <BsMvGH.5nw@cs.dal.ca>
 <92223.180932ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> <BstKBs.GJz@cs.dal.ca>

In article <BstKBs.GJz@cs.dal.ca> Fraudulent Franklin wrote again:

>In <92223.180932ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> Linda Birmingham writes:
>
>>In article <BsMvGH.5nw@cs.dal.ca> Steve Franklin says:
>>>
>>>In <92218.124206ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> Linda Birmingham writes:
>>>
>>>>They're complicated people leading complicated lives, and
>>>>he complicates their problems by telling complicated lies
>>>>     The Flag, Barenaked Linda
>>>                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ scary thought eh?

You really are a puerile prat, aren't you?
No wonder you've become Darcy's pet.

>Don't you get it Linda? The worst thing you can probably do is change
>something someone else has written.

Indeed child.  Why have you failed to grasp this?

Stevie you're beyond desperate when you forge text
twice that has appeared in numerous posts, but even
more so when you forge the name of a Canadian band
whose album just went gold.  Do they not provide
you a radio in your monk's cell?

And didn't your priest ever talk to you about the
sin of deceit?




Linda
--
They're complicated people leading complicated lives, and
he complicates their problems by telling complicated lies
     The Flag, Barenaked Ladies
From: king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Homosexuals are like the rest of us, right?
Date: 13 Aug 92 14:59:40 GMT
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine

Look who's back for more abuse:

In article <Aug.12.07.31.03.1992.24980@romulus.rutgers.edu> kaldis@romulus.rutgers.edu (Theodore Abnormal Kaldis) writes:
>> If you come back to reality, and look at the normal homosexuals [...]
>
>I would submit, rather, that it is Mark C. Carroll who needs to return
>to reality: the term "normal homosexual" is in fact an oxymoron.

But no more than the term "normal fascist bigot pinhead kneejerk reactionary" 
is an oxymoron, eh Teddy dearest?

Suppose that I manufactured widgets and every once in a while an abnormal
widget popped off the line. Suppose further that 95% of the time this
abnormality was characterized by having Ted's face embossed on it. Would 
this not make Ted's face a "normal abnormality"?

-- 
                       Se non e` vero, e` ben trovato 
     ...{utzoo|mnetor}!dciem!dretor!king        king@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca


-- 
                       Se non e` vero, e` ben trovato 
     ...{utzoo|mnetor}!dciem!dretor!king        king@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12023 talk.abortion:31436
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: STEPHEN CHANEY STRIKES OUT! (or: Hey, Franklin, Look Who's On _Your_ Side!)
Date: 13 Aug 92 02:58:59 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

Well, I was wrong.  I said that nobody would come to Stevie Franklin's
support.  I forgot about the Borg Invasion Fleet.

In article <1992Aug12.223904.3027@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu
(Stephen A Chaney) wrote:
> 
> This article is the absolutely most devastating thing I have ever seen
> in my entire stay on USENET.

Undoubtedly this is a fair indicator of just how little time you've been on
the net.

> No single human being could possibly take
> this much damage in one sitting and not go absolutely crazy.

Damage?  Oh, you mean to Mr. Franklin.  I expect he'll recover in time.  It
is, after all, just embarassment.  Really, if simply making a complete and
utter ass of oneself in public were enough to drive one crazy, why, then, 
somebody like _you_ would be...would be...

Never mind.

> Even "Borgie Boy" (yours truly) couldn't take hits like this...

Really?  I thought you were impervious to everything, including logic,
common sense, ordinary decency and intelligence.

> Well, outgrowing USENET is one thing: I use it as training.

Training for what, exactly?  Toilet training?  Training to look like
someone with severe developmental problems?  It's working, Dennis.

> As for Internet, I won't outgrow that. :) I'll just add onto it.

A fairly dramatic statement for somebody who regularly confused USENET with
UNIX.  

> But for those who live and die by USENET... Well, Lefty can tell us.
> Just don't remove his USENET access or eegads, he'll die. :) 

Why, Dennis, is that a _threat_?	

> After seeing how the others treat him, I'd be more in Darcy's camp
> than against.. 

And why does _this_ fail to surprise me?  Turds of a feather flocking
together, eh?

> >def: anal-ostrich: n, One who, rather than bury his head in the sand
> >insists on burying it up his ass.
> 
> That's a classic. A pure, original classic. Let's just stop and give
> this one a hearty round of applause because frankly, it is dead
> accurate.

Which leads to the question: what _is_ the sound of one fool clapping?

> This is too horrendous for even yours truly, "Borgie Boy," to bear.

Great.  Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out, eh, Dennis?

> Have mercy on the kid, Steve!

Oh, certainly.  It's evident just how distressed I am.

> Aw, you mean you let him _live?_ 

I don't believe he had much of a choice in the matter, Dennis.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,aus.flame
From: Ender@csc.canberra.edu.au (Ender Wiggin)
Subject: Re: Product Announcement: I. S.
Organization: Under protest
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 23:06:25 GMT

In article <1992Aug11.094142.22195@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE> gritzner@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Thomas F. Gritzner) writes:


>Tweet tweet tweet tweeeeeeeeeeeet

>It is five minutes to 12. Here are the news from Netherworld(TM).

>SYDNEY II. As recently known, the concern Gozerian Tools Inc.(FREE) presents a
>new model of a artificial brain device called Iain Sinclair. They have
>provided their announcement with a large excuse for the last introduced model.
>They regret the unexpected stupid behaviour of this carefully constructed
>artificial intelligence. They admit that the erroneous behaviour including
>writing lame flames terrorizing UseNet comes from bugs in /usr/bin,
>/etc/net.config and /usr/man/mann/clue.l. The last crossposting has shown the
>progress of the fault propagation. The new model will be connected off from
>UseNet, even if misc.test will be the appropriate Newsgroup to check out how
>the new Iain Sinclair works. To the question of practicability of the project
>the speaker of Gozerian Tools Inc. confirms that Iain Sinclair was intended to
>be a more intelligent seatbelt ...


Much as I detest Iain , this isn't very good.
Ender.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12028 talk.abortion:31446
Organization: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Wednesday, 12 Aug 1992 09:59:31 EST
From: Linda Birmingham <ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
 <1992Aug12.020846.7594@cfctech.cfc.com>


In his never ending attempt to backpedal, Darcy writes
In article <1992Aug12.020846.7594@cfctech.cfc.com>:                            n

>In article <1992Aug10.031935.11328@watson.ibm.com> Larry Margolis writes:

>>(2) Don's comment was in response to the stupid and insensitive comment
>>by Suzanne Forgach.
>
>Larry, there's a big difference between discussing such matters in detached,
>abstract generalities, on the one hand (as Suzanne was doing),

Suzanne's post was detached? Oh Kevie you have lost it.

>I still maintain that Don was the first to truly
>hammer the issue home in talk.abortion. And I also maintain that the wording
>of his post was ambiguous, and the braggy, confrontational tone was HIGHLY
>unusual for a revelation so intimate and personal. I was thrown, and ended up
>making a bad assumption. I've apologized. Why does this flamewar need to rage
>on and on?

Well Darcy, do you think its possible this continues to
rage because you persist in trying to blame the victim
and paint yourself as the moral watchdog of alt.flame?



Linda
--
They're complicated people leading complicated lives, and
he complicates their problems by telling complicated lies
     The Flag, Barenaked Ladies
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods)
Subject: Re: Hanging with the HomeBoys
Organization: Misanthropes-R-Us
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 23:30:23 GMT

In <2a85b3b9.crud@crud.mn.org> trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz) writes:
>In article <l8344qINNgq8@skat.usc.edu>
>        tarra@skat.usc.edu (Frat Boy) writes:
>]I don't know or care where you live, but you don't know a hood until you've
>]been to my house.

>Do the police know about you?

No, it's just the fine collection of rusting car parts he has on the lawn out
front.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.evil
From: launce@apollo.med.utah.edu (Tri-Ungulate)
Subject: Re: All this recent discussion
Followup-To: alt.flame,alt.evil
Organization: Trifurcate-Hooved Ruminant Surveyors, Inc.
	<Bsw5AE.6rr@ecf.toronto.edu> <26610@life.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 17 Aug 92 17:01:47

In article <26610@life.ai.mit.edu> daz@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (David A. Z.) writes:

   > And if you had SLEPT with asian girls (in addition to girls of
   > other races) you'd KNOW that they are MUCH TIGHTER than other women on
   > the vast average.  

Holee nookie Batman, this "David A.Z." is sure one heckuva stud!!!
Gee, he's sooo qool, I mean, like, he posts to alt.evil & stuff and
says that he has slept with a statistically significant cohort of
women!!!  All those "tight" asian females must just *faint* at the
prospect of his he-man potency!!! Those of us in the KNOW, all KNOW
how "culturally" submissive they are! Plus we KNOW there's all the
"exotic Oriental love secrets" and "sexual exercises" they learn as
little girls!!!

   > Shit.  If I had only a small fraction of a brain like you, I'd 
   > just probably respond to your post as follows:

So solly David-san, but it is apparent that you do not even possess a
small fraction of brain matter.  This can be divined by your ridiculous
[po][boa]stings to this here froup.

   > This sort of pathetic tactic is a bunch of rubish that is beyond
   > the intelegence of the average netter.

But David-san, the intelegence (sic) of the "average netter" is
something that you ought to aspire to, although this is a goal you are
unlikely to ever achieve. It is apparent that it does not take much to
post anything that is beyond your miniscule ability to comprehend.

   > Grow up!

Perhaps the same should be said of a poor lozer who feels the
necessity to trumpet his virtual sexual prowess in alt.flame and
alt.evil.  Next time you make such blanket assertions about the
physical & cultural sexual characteristics of women of *any* race ,
I suggest you get your information from sources other than alt.sex.

-- non-mu
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12192 talk.abortion:32521
From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: hitting on dac?
Date: 19 Aug 92 23:08:01 GMT
Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise

munnari!labtam!eyrie!prolix!dac writes:
-> James G Keegan Jr writes:
-> > the hallchaney thing posting as
-> > chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes to dac:
-> > -> I advise you to cease and desist your "fuckwad" post.
-> > 
-> > i think one of the little fellows likes you dac.
-> > it looks like he's pulling your pigtails hoping
-> > you'll notice him.
-> 
-> I noticed. He don't 'alf pong with the reek of
-> self-satisfaction.  Clot that he obviously is!

both of the little lads have propeller beanies. when
they spin the propeller, they say "VROOOOOOM" very
loudly. do you find that attractive, dac?

-> > which one do you prefer, dac, the hall thing, or
-> > the chaney thing?
-> 
-> They're all the same to me, James - newbies piled on
-> newbies.  Endless streams of snot-nosed little
-> inconsequential gits, looking for action, and
-> spewing crap.

why don't you send them your gif?

-> Will you ever tire of egging on Darcy?

i don't know, dac. should i?

-- 
----
charter member   ...   T.S.A.K.C.
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.abortion
From: launce@apollo.med.utah.edu (Tri-Ungulate)
Subject: Re: STEVE FRANKLIN GOES *PLONK*
Followup-To: alt.flame,talk.abortion
Organization: Trifurcate-Hooved Ruminant Surveyors, Inc.
	<lefty-110892103039@lefty.apple.com> <BsuHnn.582@cs.dal.ca>
Date: 12 Aug 92 10:21:49

In article <BsuHnn.582@cs.dal.ca> franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (<<<***Steve
Franklin***>>> aka "Elvis" aka "edified") writes:
   >In article <BsoEBo.DFI@cs.dal.ca>, franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (<<<***Steve
   >Franklin***>>>) wrote:
   >>    Sheez Lefty. Do you not get it? I am not seeking any sort of
   >> respect from the net.

then babbles on with...

>     I'm not awfully intelligent? How about terribly intelligent? How about
>   inarguably intelligent? 

How about awfully, terribly, inarguably conceited? How about awfully,
terribly, inarguably full of shit.  After scanning your posts,
"intelligent" is not the adjective that I associate with you Mr. Franklin.

>   Okay, forget this.

What? Your claims to "awful, terrible, inarguable intelligence?"
Consider it forgotten.

>   I pride take my writing in. 

heh heh heh... Indeed.

>   No - this is not a anti-kevin-and-stevie - you folks on talk.abortion
>   are (once again I will reiterate the point)
>   Pro-Choice-Anti-Anyone-who-chooses-against-them group.

As opposed to the AntiChoiceHolierThanThouMoralArbiters group? I don't
read t.a. Mr. Franklin, but the material you've posted to a.f. so far
definitely places you in the latter.
 
>   See? There was a
>   time when I posted in seriousness to talk.abortion. However, ya just
>   can't win.

That much is apparent, at least in your case.
   
>   This is a group that is dominated by individuals by yourself
>   who have selective logic. This means that everything you say makes sense
>   to you, and anything anyone else says that doesn't correspond to your
>   thinking is trash. 

Pot. Kettle. *plonk* 

>      YOu realy think I"m a visible idiot do you? 

Hey, if you say so...

--non-mu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: short@vxdesy.desy.de
Subject: Re: Strippers
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: (DESY, Hamburg, Germany)
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 13:31:44 GMT

In article <axolotl.713511622@syzygy>, axolotl@socs.uts.edu.au (Iain Sinclair) writes:
> ra@asuvax.eas.asu.edu (Starcap'n Ra) writes:
>  >     My guess is that people
>  >are basically very stupid, with only a small
>  >minority having more than the brains of a soap
>  >dish.
> 
> My guess is that people are basically very colored, with only a small
> minority having a white complexion.
> 
>  >you're just toying with the peasants, even as
>  >I am now.
> 
> Don't that make ya feel special!
> 
> 
> --
>  Iain Sinclair    axolotl@socs.uts.edu.au

Yes - it seems to me to be trua that there is no justification for treating
people differently on the basis of distinctions in properties they cannot
change such as skin colour or intellect. However, life is impossible this way.
Racism is abhorrent but I find myself preferring the company of other
intelligent people with similar education. Is this justifiable? Or should I be
talking to plants in order to negate any potential charge of elitism?

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jdb@vulcan.anu.edu.au (John D. Barlow)
Subject: unsolicited junk email from the USA
Summary: Gripe about unsolicited junk email advertising from "Suncoast"
Keywords: junk unsolicited advertising propaganda 
Organization: Computer Services Centre, Australian National University
Date: 17 Aug 92 00:51:49 GMT

I received the following junk unsolicted email, and anybody who gets
one of these should reply to the sender telling him that it is a bad
thing to do:

>Return-Path: p00028@mail.psi.net
>Received: from worldlink.worldlink.com (worldlink.com) by arp.anu.edu.au with
>SMTP id AA03326
>  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.2.9 for jdb); Sun, 16 Aug 1992 09:28:44 +1000
>Received: by worldlink.worldlink.com (5.65b/4.0.071791-Worldlink)
>	id AA28012; Sat, 15 Aug 92 18:56:08 -0400
>Message-Id: <713929235.93.p00028@mail.psi.net>
>In-Reply-To: <1992Aug12.025022.11244@newshost.anu.edu.au>
>Date: Sat, 15 Aug 92 18:40:40 -0500
>To: "John D. Barlow" <jdb@arp.anu.edu.au>
>From: "Suncoast" <p00028@mail.psi.net>
>Organization: SWI
>X-Mailer: PSILink (3.01)
>
>          DO YOU NEED ANY SUN3 OR SPARC EQUIPMENT?
>
>  *  We are U.S. exporters of surplus Sun and Sun related hardware.
>
>  *  Our prices are low because we purchase and ship in volume.
>
>  *  Please call, fax or Email your requirements and we will
>     send a price quotation, terms, and availability immediately.
>
>  Thank you,
>
>  Brent Robinson
>  Suncoast Workstations, Inc.
>  1301 Seminole Boulevard
>  Suite 173
>  Largo, Florida 34640
>  USA
>
>  PHONE +01 813 587 7882
>  FAX   +01 813 587 7974
>  EMAIL p00028@mail.psi.net
-- 
John Barlow, Parallel Computing Research Facility, Australian National
University, I-Block, PO Box 4, Canberra, 2601, Australia.
email = John.Barlow@anu.edu.au
[International = +61 6, Australia = 06] [Phone = 2492930, Fax = 2490747]
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: DarcyVision
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 01:12:11 GMT

In article <Bt667t.4Av@world.std.com> rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) writes:
>In article <1992Aug15.160012.7813@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) babbles:
>>>So, using the newly-revealed secret of DarcyVision(R), I finally know how to
>>>interpret the bumper sticker on a car in this neighborhood which reads
>>>"Someone I love was murdered."  
>>[goes on to conclude that the owner of the car is admitting to murder]

ATTRIBUTION ALERT! The stuff in square brackets is being misattributed to me.

>No, dear, what he was doing was explaining the fallacies inherent
>in your thinking (sic).

Yeah, by making up some straw man analogy and insisting that it's relevant to 
the discussion at hand. Is anyone except you fooled by these slimy tactics?

								- Kevin
From: trashman@crud.mn.org (Barry Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A Warning From Darcy (was The world according to)
Date: 16 Aug 92 11:45:00 GMT
Organization: TSAKC-TC

In article <1992Aug8.201344.5978@rotag.mi.org>
        kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:

]I've been honest all along, and Susie still insists on maintaining a 
]central role in Keegan's irrational vendetta against me.

Gee, Kebbin, all you have to do to defeat them and end the vendetta
is put Keegan and Susan in your killfile.


--
Barry Schwartz        trashman@crud.mn.org
Xref: sparky alt.flame:12087 talk.abortion:31835