HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: krobinso@peach.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: K e n Is Intelligent (was Re: KEN IS A DUMN FUCK.)
Date: 11 Nov 92 19:41:08 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <sf07eAS00WBOA9hpdW@andrew.cmu.edu> Shiv Swarup Pathak <sp3u+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>
>Your seemingly never ending postings make my butt water.  You have got
>to the the biggest egomaniac to ever use a computer (or does your
>hairy-lipped, wig-wearing, zit-faced, loose-toit, unemployed prostitute
>(on maternity leave) mother do everything for you?)  I'm sick of your
>postings.  If I don't, you can get your hairy, puss-filled ass
>(inhereted from your mother) that someone is going to beat you like a
>rented mule.

You seem to be quite misinformed. Water does not flow from your anus,
for your anus would be similar to a sink faucet. It would be an unusual
occupation (being a sink), but K e n highly advises against it. You
should seek medical attention for that leaking problem.

Further pieces of misinformation have been found in your post. K e n
will go over each of them, one at a time.

K e n's mother does nothing for K e n, for K e n is capable of 
accomplishing everything that K e n sets out to do. K e n's mother
does not have the characteristics you have presented her to have.
K e n's mother cannot be compared with any of them.

If you are sick of my postings, then you should seek medical attention,
for inputting characters from the terminal screen and translating them
into meaning should not make anyone sick. It's quite a simple process.

And further, there is no puss in K e n's anus. Such an ingredient
is not expected to be there, and isn't. As for people beating people,
K e n suggests that that is not nice, and that they should seriously
consider getting a life. Such behavior will not be tolerated.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:51:19 GMT

In article <RBR3TB11w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
>vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>> In article <XFFZTB6w165w@mantis.co.uk>, mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
>> > At a guess, it beats voting for a mealy-mouthed fascist hypocrite who claim
>> > atheists can't be US citizens, nobody but his friends should be allowed to
>> > have abortions, and that there is no recession.
>> 
>> You stupid brainwashed, pathetic attempt at a human being. Only a spineless
>> liberal worm like yourself would have the lack of intelligence to post
>> something as moronic as you have. For just one moment, stop your hand from
>> stroking your rather swollen penis and kindly place it far up your ass and
>> shake hands with your mother. She would be proud of her cow's rectum for a so
>
>There is more to flaming than stringing together meaningless insults and bad
>language.  
	Doesn't have to be.
>Flailing around in anger when someone ridicules your right-wing
>political opinions isn't flaming,
	yes it is.

>it's a rather pathetic and transparent
>attempt at smokescreening.  
	Thank you for your analysis, o master of verbal strategy.

>You'd gain a little more respect if you just
	Respect? From who? You? He could probably do with out it.	


>Don't bother replying with further teenage insult and unfocused aggression. 
>Flaming is a battle of wits, and I have no intention of engaging an unarmed
>opponent.
>
>mathew
	Unfocused? The only one unarmed in the battle of wits here is you.
His aggresion is very focused. It's focused on you. And, since you didn't 
notice it the first time, here's some of it. You pitiful excuse for a Human
Being! What kind of life must you have to post ridiculous nonsense like that?
The world would be much better served if you would take your hand off the
keyboard and let it join your other hand stroking your penis. Both the world
and you would be much happier.

William Everett
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Melvin's Proud of that Sig, Isn't He? [was Re: Why Clinton?]
Summary: Lose the 30 line sig, or else.
Date: 11 Nov 92 06:50:41 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

(Melvin Gladstone) writes:
>
>
>
> ___        ___    _______   __    ___        ___   ______   ___     __
>|   \      /   |  |   ____| |  |   \  \      /  /  |_    _| |   \   |  |
>|    \    /    |  |  |      |  |    \  \    /  /     |  |   |    \  |  |
>|     \  /     |  |  |___   |  |     \  \  /  /      |  |   |     \ |  |
>|  |\  \/  /|  |  |   ___|  |  |      \  \/  /       |  |   |  |\  \|  |
>|  | \    / |  |  |  |      |  |       \    /        |  |   |  | \     |
>|  |  \  /  |  |  |  |____  |  |____    \  /        _|  |_  |  |  \    | 
>|__|   \/   |__|  |_______| |_______|    \/        |______| |__|   \___|
>
> ___        ___    ______    __        __            __        ________
>|   \      /   |  |_    _|  |  |      |  |          /  \      |   ____  \
>|    \    /    |    |  |    |  |      |  |         /    \     |  |    |  |
>|     \  /     |    |  |    |  |      |  |        /  /\  \    |  |____|  |
>|  |\  \/  /|  |    |  |    |  |      |  |       /  /__\  \   |   ____  <
>|  | \    / |  |    |  |    |  |      |  |      |   ____   |  |  |    |  |
>|  |  \  /  |  |   _|  |_   |  |____  |  |____  |  |    |  |  |  |    |  |
>|__|   \/   |__|  |______|  |_______| |_______| |__|    |__|  |__|    |__| D
>
> __________    __            __       ________      _______    ________
>|   ____   |  |  |          /  \     |   ___  \    /  ___  \  |__    __|
>|  |    |__|  |  |         /    \    |  |   |  |  |  |   |__|    |  |
>|  |          |  |        /  /\  \   |  |   |  |  |  |_____      |  |
>|  |   ____   |  |       /  /__\  \  |  |   |  |   \_____  \     |  |
>|  |  |_   |  |  |      |   ____   | |  |   |  |   __    |  |    |  |
>|  |____|  |  |  |____  |  |    |  | |  |___|  |  |  |___|  |    |  |
>|__________|  |_______| |__|    |__| |________/    \_______/     |__| O N E


OK, Melvin Millard.  It's nice that you've come out of your shell and all.
I feel like you're my own bastard son.  You know, watching you come along
since your first toddling alt.flame steps and all...  BUT!

This damn sig is getting on my nerves.  I'm gonna have to drag your butt
over to alt.flame.gigantic.sigs (or whatever the hell it's called) and 
rough you up pretty soon.

I mean, it *is* a funny name and all, but give it a rest.  

-- Andy
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Cast your vote: Troll vs. Lara
Summary: Troll who?
Date: 5 Nov 92 05:02:15 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <1992Nov4.112915.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>Lara wants a vote, folks, to decide who won our little flame war.  She needs
>the votes to patch up her quickly deflating ego and her ruptured breast
>implants.  So, let's oblige.  Cast your ballot for TROLL or LARA via post.
>
>I vote for me.
>
>Off to a good start already: Troll:1    Lara:0
>
>						Troll



Troll.  Hmmm.  Troll.  Lessee now.  That *seems* familiar.
Damn!  Seems like I remember something about a Troll...

Oh yeah.  *Now* I remember.  You're that scabrous, little warty toad-stool,
wet-behind-the-ears punk, who hides behind a "Troll" handle.

Howya doing!  Sorry it took so long to remember you, but then your posts
*weren't* very memorable, were they?  I thought you left to bone up for 
your finals.  How's that remedial physical coordination class coming?
Just remember:  Your left hand is the one you pick your nose with; your
right is the one you spank your diseased monkey with.

Great handle though!  Who else would have thought of using the handle
"Troll"?   

  TROLL (verb) -  To fish by trailing a baited line behind a slowly
		  moving boat.
        (noun) -  A lure used for trolling.      

I really don't think I should vote, since I can't remember much of what
you wrote.  Excellent strategy, though!  Lara apparently fell for your
pretense of leaving the group.  It should be safe for you to come back
now.  We promise not to pick on you, little fish-bait.

Bye now!

-- Andy
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 6 Nov 92 21:13:28 GMT
Organization: University of Northern Indiana

In article <BxB1E4.5y2@mach1.wlu.ca>, sche7135@mach1.wlu.ca (Scott Schelter u) writes:
>
>	FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>     That's right folks! I'm looking for the most graphic, verbose
>flames and insults you can muster. Gimme' something really juicy.
>
>
>                SCOTTY LE DOG
>                sche7135@mach1.wlu.ca
>

Hi person who forgot to logout, my name is Melvin and I have a
new sig (in addition to wanting to be your friend).



 ___        ___    _______   __    ___        ___   ______   ___     __
|   \      /   |  |   ____| |  |   \  \      /  /  |_    _| |   \   |  |
|    \    /    |  |  |      |  |    \  \    /  /     |  |   |    \  |  |
|     \  /     |  |  |___   |  |     \  \  /  /      |  |   |     \ |  |
|  |\  \/  /|  |  |   ___|  |  |      \  \/  /       |  |   |  |\  \|  |
|  | \    / |  |  |  |      |  |       \    /        |  |   |  | \     |
|  |  \  /  |  |  |  |____  |  |____    \  /        _|  |_  |  |  \    | 
|__|   \/   |__|  |_______| |_______|    \/        |______| |__|   \___|

 ___        ___    ______    __        __            __        ________
|   \      /   |  |_    _|  |  |      |  |          /  \      |   ____  \
|    \    /    |    |  |    |  |      |  |         /    \     |  |    |  |
|     \  /     |    |  |    |  |      |  |        /  /\  \    |  |____|  |
|  |\  \/  /|  |    |  |    |  |      |  |       /  /__\  \   |   ____  <
|  | \    / |  |    |  |    |  |      |  |      |   ____   |  |  |    |  |
|  |  \  /  |  |   _|  |_   |  |____  |  |____  |  |    |  |  |  |    |  |
|__|   \/   |__|  |______|  |_______| |_______| |__|    |__|  |__|    |__| D

 __________    __            __       ________      _______    ________
|   ____   |  |  |          /  \     |   ___  \    /  ___  \  |__    __|
|  |    |__|  |  |         /    \    |  |   |  |  |  |   |__|    |  |
|  |          |  |        /  /\  \   |  |   |  |  |  |_____      |  |
|  |   ____   |  |       /  /__\  \  |  |   |  |   \_____  \     |  |
|  |  |_   |  |  |      |   ____   | |  |   |  |   __    |  |    |  |
|  |____|  |  |  |____  |  |    |  | |  |___|  |  |  |___|  |    |  |
|__________|  |_______| |__|    |__| |________/    \_______/     |__| O N E
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:38:56 GMT

In article <kmR3TB12w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> writes:
>weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
>> In article <XFFZTB6w165w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes:
>> >Leonard.Kinerson@p0.f110.n363.z1.fidonet.org (Leonard Kinerson) writes:
>> >> Are There any people out there that voted For Clinton
>> >> If So WHY!!!!!!!!!
>> >
>> >At a guess, it beats voting for a mealy-mouthed fascist hypocrite who claims
>> >atheists can't be US citizens,
>> 	didn't say this
>
>Your denial is singularly unimpressive, as I happen to have the entire quote
>and a set of references to hand.
 
>#  RS: "Surely you recognize the equal citizenship and patriotism of
>#       Americans who are atheists?"
># 
>#  GB: "No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens,
>#       nor should they be considered patriots.  This is one nation under
>#       God."
># 
>#  RS: "Do you support as a sound constitutional principle the separation
>#       of state and church?"
># 
>#  GB: "Yes, I support the separation of church and state.  I'm just not
>#       very high on atheists."

>Feeling like a moron?  Since this posting is already far too long, I'll
>refrain from commenting on your other stupid knee-jerk denials.
>
>> 	Get your facts straight before you mouth off.
>
>Take your own advice, loser.
>
>
>mathew
	No, I'm not feeling like a Moron. What George bush said is 'I don't 
know that they should be' which is NOT the same thing as stating that they
should not be. I suggest you take a reading comprehension course before
you take off on a knee-jerk assumption again. As for my other 'stupid
knee-jerk denials' your evidence for them is probably about as impressive
as this, which is to say- not very. Like I said before, Get your facts 
straight before you mouth off. This time, follow my advice.

William Everett
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: about your votes . . .
Date: 12 Nov 92 21:53:09 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton


	It saddens me to see that not a single person in this group can cast an
impartial vote.  That reduces this whole poll to a mere popularity contest.
So, after fucking over about 10 of you regular lameflames who think your so
tough, I did expect the results I'm seeing- that is, I didn't expect to be too
popular.  No matter, in your hearts and in mine we will both always know I was
the winner and when the poll is said and done, I'll go on kicking your asses,
business as usual.

I will take the loss as a simple affirmation of how much I actually get to you
all.  Another job well done.

				Troll
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: msmiller@Rational.COM (Mark Miller)
Subject: Re: A Troll Farewell, a troll hello . . .
Organization: Rational
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 22:56:47 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.143206.1@jaguar.uofs.edu>, jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
|> 
|> [ ... miscellaneous spooze deleted ... ]
|>   
|> Every time I come here the results are always the same, a few cretins rise to
|> the occasion and I roll right over them just like those tanks rolled over the
|> student protestors in Tiennamen Square.

Hmmm ... Duh Twoll has been reading Kevin's stuff again I see.

"Numerous newbies have come and gone. My altar is soaked with 
 blood."
    -- The Kebbin
       <1992Aug24.022216.7732@rotag.mi.org>

You've picked quite the role model.

	-MSM
-- 
________________________________________________________________________
Mark S. Miller                                     msmiller@Rational.COM
"Life is a 4-letter word."                        msmiller@world.std.com
[ insert tedious disclaimer drivel here ]                           IV-Q
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: nap42487@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Nishith A. Patel)
Subject: Re: Does VESA Local Bus put a huge strain on a CPU?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 22:56:02 GMT

d89os@efd.lth.se (Ola Sigurdson) writes:
>It has nothing to do with OS/2, and most of the articles have no
>information content at all (like this one :-)

OS/2 is a graphical environment, right? can we agree on this one?
Since graphics are so slow, certain methods of speeding them up should be
taken into consideration. I am still trying to find the answer to my original
question, and the reason I asked is because I want much better performance
with OS/2 environment and other things in the future.


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar Samant)
Subject: Re: K E N is K E N
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 11:22:31 GMT

bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:

> [something]
>
>At the very least, go crawl under a rock or something,

Listen, being a new name and all your letter gets at least looked at,
and what does one find but another goddamned contribution to the ken
atrocity.

And you further ask others to go crawl under rocks.

Is the irony too subtle for your brain?

Sincerely,
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jvigneau@cs.alt.flame (|Joe Vigneau|)
Subject: Re: FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!
Organization: /usr/u/guest/jvigneau/.organization
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 03:30:22 GMT

In article <BxB1E4.5y2@mach1.wlu.ca> sche7135@mach1.wlu.ca (Scott Schelter u) 
proves he's a moron by posting:

>	   FLAME ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>	That's right folks! I'm looking for the most graphic, verbose
>   flames and insults you can muster. Gimme' something really juicy.

>         No mail-bombs please .

*burp*

--
jvigneau@cs.ulowell.edu-<All opinions are mine, not UMassLowell's>-Joe Vigneau
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Thank God for Ron Brown
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 03:15:09 GMT

In article <1dec8nINN1vs@news.aero.org>, helfman@aero.org (Robert S. Helfman) writes:
> In article <1992Nov6.054321.20824@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> a74k110@phobos.ucc.umass.edu writes:
>>In article <Bx9y2B.6K1@news.udel.edu>, johnston@me.udel.edu (Bill Johnston) writes...
>>>In article <Bx9HKC.FH3@news.cso.uiuc.edu> locker@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jon Locker) writes:
>>> 
>>>>Anyone care to speculate on the man's future?
>>> 
>>>I'm not sure whether he'll be willing to give up working the political
>>>side after his success as the party leader, but I was impressed by
>>
>>He's pretty much said (in not so many words) that he'd love to work in a 
>>Clinton Admin.
>>
>>>Ron Brown's discussion of the law and legal education when he gave
>>>the commencement address at a local law school last summer.
>>> 
>>>Attorney General or Education Secretary?
>>> 
>>
>>
>>Vernon Jordan (former civil rights leader) has Attorney General pretty much
>>locked up....
> 
> Oh, would that be sweet revenge on the Reagan/Bush years! The only thing
> that would be sweeter would be (alright, I admit, an unlikely event)
> Anita Hill for the next Supreme Court seat.
> 

Just wondering what others thought about this.
From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (Patrick Taylor)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Cast your vote: Troll vs. Lara
Date: 5 Nov 92 15:54:07 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
X-Disclaimer: This article was posted by a user at Ericsson.
              Any opinions expressed are strictly those of the
              user and not necessarily those of Ericsson.

In article <1992Nov4.112915.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>Lara wants a vote, folks, to decide who won our little flame war.  She needs
>the votes to patch up her quickly deflating ego and her ruptured breast
>implants.  So, let's oblige.  Cast your ballot for TROLL or LARA via post.


Perhaps you need the votes to patch up your quicly deflating testicles, 
bitten by your net.ratbag.boof-buddies.

>I vote for me.

Probably voted for Slick Willie, too.

>Off to a good start already: Troll:1    Lara:0

Sorry, I already voted for one loser (Bush), so I can't afford to repeat the
mistake by throwing one away on your putrid corpus pugnacius.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Looking for a new sig...

  - Patrick Taylor, Ericsson Network Systems
    exuptr@exu.ericsson.se                    "Don't let the .se fool you"
    exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org  <SLOW!>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
Subject: Re: Vendetta? What vendetta?
Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:50:22 GMT

mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone) writes:
->keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
->>and here i thought you wanted to be my friend......
->>
->Well yes, I do.  There's no conflict here.  After all Ken and Kevin are
->my friends.

you're a sick man, mel.
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A Troll Farewell, a troll hello . . .
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:32:06 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton

In article <Bx0464.6q9@cmptrc.lonestar.org>, andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
> 
> And so... with a grand flourish of his ego... I mean, hat... the diminutive,
> ugly troll rode away into the sunset with the words:
> 
>        "Never fear!  I will return some day when you have all
> 	forgotten me!  That way you won't notice that I'm 
> 	posting the same puerile insults over and over!"
 
> -- Andy

At least I have some ego to flourish and some accomplishments (ha ha) here,
what the fuck have you ever contributed, Mr. Personality?  Your trite,
snappy one-liners make you a minor player at best.  I class you in the ranks
with the rest of the unknowns, punk.  But of course, now that I've  made the
mistake of recognizing you, they'll say you're some kind of contender like that
miserable bitch Lara (I know she'll hear that I mentioned her and be back, she
just can't resist the troll).  I can state pretty contently that I am the best
flamer here, and always will be whether I'm here or not.  Why do I even waste
my time with you people?  I have a 14 year old, semi-illiterate cousin who can
think of better comebacks who I can go toe to toe with in real life, yet I
torture myself with typing just to entertain this rabble . . . .    
Every time I come here the results are always the same, a few cretins rise to
the occasion and I roll right over them just like those tanks rolled over the
student protestors in Tiennamen Square.  

      Maybe, I should consult K E N, maybe he can recommend a good cousellor.
  
                              Mr. Troll (to you)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: page@sirocco.cs.odu.edu ()
Subject: ken.  no caps or spaces, just ken.
Organization: Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 02:59:24 GMT

>>>>How can you followup a discussion about your genitals on alt.flame
>>>>by claiming that such a topic is not on alt.flame?  Obviously it
>>>>is a topic of discussion or we wouldn't be discussing it, would
>>>>we?  Does anyone have any more info on ken's genitals?  Bruce?
>>>
>>>K e n does not recognize such a discussion, thus K e n is not 
>>>discussing such a topic. If K e n wishes to present that information
>>>to the group, then K e n will do so. At the present time, this
>>>discussion is purposeless. Must K e n continue to inform people that
>>>K e n's genitals is not the topic of discussion? Engage your brains
>>>and then perhaps you will understand.
>>>
>>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>>
>>this has got to be the lamest followup I've ever seen by ken.
>>I mean, I read alt.flame every day, and I follow the ken 
>>flames for the fun of it, but this one sickened me with its 
>>stupidity.  ken, you're slipping.
>>I suppose he'll call me misinformed now.  joy.
>
>Yes, you are correct. You are misinformed, but that's besides the point.
>K e n was discussing topical arrangements. K e n never discussed
>K e n's genitals, thus K e n's followup (above) was correct to the
>previous post, which was a definition of stupidity. Thus K e n, is
>not "slipping", for K e n has nothing to slip from.
>
>K e n   R o b i n s o n

at first, i was going to flame you back, but then i decided that
everyone already knew that you were an idiot.  get your jollies
ken, and we'll just treat you like the human tetherball you are.


-- 
	"Oh, lets be friends, you big faceless minion of evil!"
			--Mr.Weasel on Darkwing Duck
page@cs.odu.edu
From: krobinso@peach.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K E N Again
Date: 11 Nov 92 19:31:45 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1992Nov11.042036.3574@Princeton.EDU> datepper@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Aaron Tepper) writes:
>So Ken "Egoman" Robinson sez:
>The only proof you need is the posts that K e n posts, for they are
>filled with vast amounts of important information proving my advanced
>genetic structure, for I am K e n, and K e n is K e n, and K e n
>is advanced.
>
>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>
>	Now I would not presume to know the content of K e n's DNA; I'll
>leave that one to a more advanced alt.flamer. However, I think I can
>safely say that either K e n's genetic structure is a normal double
>helix (with various 3-dimensional configurations that would be tedious
>to discuss here) or he is utterly alien. I think it's the latter. In any
>case, it seems K e n is the misinformed one here.

K e n is not misinformed. K e n is not alien. K e n is of the Earth,
thus K e n is not alien to the local environment. You seem to be
viewing the television for precarious amounts of time. K e n suggests
you go outside an experience Nature. It's much more enlightening
than television.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Xref: sparky alt.flame:14720 misc.test:13018