HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: stcmille@panix.com (Steve Miller)
Subject: Re: Most Overrated Actor/Actress
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:30:04 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC



>>Like...Charlton Heston and Richard Harris (except in a few like _Unforgiven_).


Charlton Heston is so great is so many great movies that it is difficult
to understand how anybody would include him on their list of the
overrated.  Tacky?  Pompous?  Yes.  Overrated?  Seldom to never.

I love Harris, also.
-- 

__________________________________________________________
Steve Miller				stcmille@panix.com
		A Famous Rock Star!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: most underated actress/actor
From: thomas@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Beagle)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 02:19:22 GMT
Organization: Datamark International Ltd.

In article <1634@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM> lsnow@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Linda Snow) writes:
>In article <92351.123026MMB3@psuvm.psu.edu> MMB3@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>>Definitely Whoopi Goldberg.  Flame me if you want but I think that this

>2. She's incredibly popular -- do you know anyone who doesn't love her? Well
>maybe my ex-husband but he doesn't count, he has no taste.

I don't!

Indeed, seeing that Whoopi Goldberg is in a film is nearly enough to
make me avoid it.

Not quite sure why - perhaps it's the voice?

-- 
    Thomas Beagle | thomas@datamark.co.nz           Work: 64 4 233 8186
Datamark Intl Ltd | thomas@cavebbs.welly.gen.nz     Home: 64 4 499 3832
 Technical Writer | Yes, I do have long ears, a black nose, and a tail.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: Movie Question
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 21:34:01 GMT

In article <Af=E7ZO00WBKM6MGYQ@andrew.cmu.edu> Saul Markowitz <sm6t+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>Hi!  Has anyone heard anything about the new movie entitled "Lorenzo's
>Oil" with Susan Sarandon and Nick Nolte? I'm very excited about this
>movie because there is a senior drama student from Carnegie Mellon
>University named Maduka Steady who has a lead role in the movie.
>
>I've seen commercials and posters, but have no idea when it will be
>released. Also, has anyone seen a sneak preview?

"Lorenzo's Oil" is going to be released, in LA and New York, at least,
in about 1 week, in time for Oscar consideration.  It will eventually
open more widely.  This is the first film George Miller the Greater
has made since "The Witches of Eastwick", and the advanced word is
that it will figure strongly at least in the major acting categories.
The story is a true one, about parents who refuse to give up on their
critically ill son and, despite no medical background, personally 
research a cure for his illness.

-- 
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jlj5a@Virginia.EDU (Joseph Lee Jackson)
Subject: universities
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 04:34:38 GMT

ARE WHITE SCHOOLS ANY BETTER THAN BLACK SCHOOLS?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: spandian@nyx.cs.du.edu (Vaisnavi)
Subject: Top 10 movies of all time
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 03:25:46 GMT

My choice of top 10 movies of all time ( not ordered ) :
______________________________________

(1) Doctor Zhivago (Omar Shariff) 

(2) Gandhi (Ben Kingsley/Produced by Richard Attenborough)

(3) City Lights (Charlie Chaplin)

(4) Around the world in 80 days ( A classic)

(5) Ben Hur ( I like the long chariot race )

(6) Raiders of the lost ark (Steven Spielberg)

(7) Close encounters of the third kind ( Steven Spielberg)

(8) Beetlejuice ( Michael Keaton, Winona Ryder/Tim Burton )

(9) The last temptation of Christ 

(10) The living daylights ( Timothy Dalton )

_____________________________________________________________
 Your comments are welcome..
_____________________________________________________________
From: bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Robert Church)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Problems with DieHard 2
Date: 15 Dec 92 04:17:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Ohio University School of Art. Athens

In article <1gi6hmINNkck@eagle.natinst.com> darrenl@natinst.com (Darren Lilie) writes:
>I watched DieHard 2(again) over the weekend and there are a couple of things
>that I have to mention.  At the end of the  movie when McClane lit the trail
>of gas leaking from the jet engine he just happened to be sitting right at
>the end of the trail.  I mean that when he lit it it was right in front of him.
>On top of that, the fuel had been leaking before he fell off the plane so had
>he landed right on top of the "fuel trail" the flame would have went backwards
>too and burned him, but instead it just went forward toward the plane.
>
>Another thing, when he was in the cockpit of the plane when they threw all the
>grenades in, it sure took a long time for those grenades to go off. 
>
>The whole thing with not being able to light the runway was ridiculous. They 
>could have lined up all those firetrucks,ambulances, etc. on the sides of the
>runway.
>
>I enjoyed the movie(not as much as the first) but I wanted to mention these
>things.

If you get a chance to see the December 13th episode of the Ben Stiller show
'Die Hard 12' do so. You'll get a great answer to your questions.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Good 1st time, not second
From: <WELACK@MIAMIU.BITNET>
Date: Wednesday, 16 Dec 1992 13:03:21 EST
Organization: Miami University - Academic Computer Service

In article <1992Dec9.215620.5218@wuecl.wustl.edu>, dgp@atlas.wustl.edu (Don
Porter) says:
>
><1g5ks2INNb3a@seven-up.East.Sun.COM> dcarter@supra.East.Sun.COM writes:
>> Any movies you saw the first time and thought was good but not the
>> second time you saw it?

I felt this way about "Fatal Attraction". The first time I thought
it was pretty riveting, the second, dumb, especially the ending.

Bill Lack
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN)
Subject: Re: re: Why Casablanca ? (was Re: Top Five Movies of All Time)
Organization: Ostfold College
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 15:27:27 GMT

In article <1992Dec9.063431.1@mdcbbs.com> gutierrez@mdcbbs.com writes:
>>>
>>>The Laws Of Cinema #1 :
>>>'I like movies therefore I must like Casablanca"
>
>
>>   Yes, you are wierd.
>
>
>Just wondering, Phil K, what does W-I-E-R-D means?  I tried Webster's,
>Collier's, Roget's, etc. but couldn't find it listed.  You happen to
>have your own dictionary or a different set of vocabulary words?
>

I think he writes american not english. Color, trashcan, ass etc.

_________________________________________________________________________
| Jorn Halonen              | "dinga ding dang my danga long ling long" |
| jorngh@sofus.dhhalden.no  |                               - Ministry  |
From: rhogan@aludra.usc.edu (Ron Hogan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Jurassic Park
Date: 13 Dec 1992 00:36:13 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble) writes:
>cew2w@Virginia.EDU ("Chris Wrike") writes:

>> Jurriasic Park was (in)famous for being the first book to ever have its
>> screen rights purchased before it was published. 
>Wasn't this the case for the book Lynch's 'Wild At Heart' was based on?

Yes.

Ron Hogan
rhogan@usc.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mgq@inel.gov (Michael G McKellar)
Subject: Re: Alfred Hitchcock's Notorious
Organization: Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 16:11:14 GMT

In article <1992Dec18.104215.1@eagle.wesleyan.edu> whan@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:
>After reading a ton of people's opinion's on the top ten or five movies of all
>time I found that Alfred Hitchcock's Notorious had been seriously neglected. 
>Needless to say I was pleased to learn that Roger Ebert had included Notorious
>on his Top Ten list.  I mean it's a great movie; it's got comedy, suspense,
>drama, and romance.  It's got Cary Grant, Ingrid Bergman, and Claude Rains. 
>Are there more people out there who like this movie or what?  Quite frankly I
>could watch it over and over again and not get bored or it.  Any comments?
>
>Winfield Han
>WHAN@eagle.wesleyan.edu
>
I agree that Notorious is a great movie, but my favorite Hitchcock
films are Rear Window and North by Northwest.  Gary Grant is one of
my favorite actors and I like North by Northwest the most of all his
films.  As to which ones I like better, I can't choose between Rear
Window and NBNW.

Mike McKellar (mgq@inel.gov)

========== long legal disclaimer follows, press n to skip ===========

Neither the United States Government or the Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory or any of their employees, makes any warranty, whatsoever,
implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility regarding any
information, disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe
privately owned rights.  No specific reference constitutes or implies
endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States
Government or the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory.  The views and
opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the
United States Government or the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory,
and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: barrus@cod.nosc.mil
Subject: re: most underated actress/actor
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, CA
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 19:26:22 GMT

What about John Heard.  I've always liked him. And he has been in some exceptional
movies as "Trip to Bountiful", but you really don't see him in any meaty roles
anymore.  "Home Alone" excepted.

JDB
From: jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JOSEPH ALOYSIUS MCVEIGH)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: annoying nuances in films
Date: 15 Dec 92 19:50:47 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

ceo2p@curry.edschool.Virginia.EDU (Christine Ellen O'connor) writes:
>       Why is it that some of the most annoying little things
>that are so obvious in films really turn you inside out while
>watching a film???

[Ferinstances deleted]

>I hate these nuances!!  My question is: if they are so obvious
>to us, why does someone in the film-making process miss us?
>Don't they have people to check for these types of slips?

They're called script supervisors, and they're the people who are supposed to
remember how much of the beer should still be in the glass, to which page the
newspaper was open, what time the clock read, etc. etc., for continuity
bewtween different takes.

The S.S. must work without prints from the earlier (e.g.) prior day's shoot,
so it's a daunting task that requires a gargantuan memory. Often it's over
several days/weeks. I can forgive a few snafus, and to be honest, it gives me
an opportunity to hunt them out as a pastime.

(Info gleaned from a good New York Times article from last Sunday 12-6).

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Aloysius McVeigh |"It was a funny name. I felt sure I could remember
   jm0i@.Lehigh.edu     | anyone with a name like Aloysius. It was a good
       "N.I.N.A."       | Catholic name."            - Ernest Miller Hemingway
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: kimp@rpi.edu (Phil Kim)
Subject: re: Top 5? 10? 15? We'll see...
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 23:48:39 GMT

In article <1992Dec20.222941.17713@news.cs.brandeis.edu> st923459@pip.cc.brandeis.edu writes:
>NORTH BY NORTHWEST
>PSYCHO
>THE BIRDS
>VERTIGO.	Four years (Vertigo-'59, Psycho-'60, Birds-'63, NxNW-'64),
>		Four classics.  You can't pick just one Hitchcock film....
Vertigo			1958
North by Northwest	1959

>This is just a starter.  And now, films to avoid:
>ANYTHING DIRECTED BY LAWRENCE KASDAN (All his films are ripoffs of movies by
>	John Sayles, a much more gifted director.  Case in point:  THE BIG
>	CHILL rips off THE RETURN OF THE SECAUCUS SEVEN).
I have to make an exception with Grand Canyon.
From: rtravsky@news.uwyo.edu (Rich Travsky)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Batman Sequels
Date: 19 Dec 92 10:55:00 MST
Distribution: world
Organization: Banzai Institute

In article <XFgXVB9w165w@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca>, panda@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca
   (Elizabeth Holden) writes:
> tara@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Lady Johanna Constantine) writes:
> [...]
>> deal, Robin Williams is supposed to be the Riddler, and there will most
> 
> Robin Williams.... well, he could certainly do it.  I hope that if he 

Yes, Williams could, but I'm more partial to Kevin Kline. Williams is
too chunky, Kline has the right build and is more athletic - witness
his full lotus in "A Fish Called Wanda". The first two Batman movies have
suffered distinctly in having main villains who couldn't fight back
(ignoring, for the moment, the somewhat ambiguous role of Catwoman).

Rich Travsky                  Division of Information Technology
University of Wyoming         rtravsky@corral.uwyo.edu
"We tottered together upon the brink of the fall. I have some knowledge, 
however, of baritsu, or the Japanese system of wrestling...I slipped 
through his grip..."  _The Return of Sherlock Holmes_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mlau@mothra.syr.EDU (Michael  Lau)
Subject: Re: Problems with DieHard 2
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 92 01:06:48 EST

In article <1992Dec16.144844.8285@nntp.hut.fi> pejulaju@niksula.hut.fi (Pentti Lajunen) writes:
>In article <BzA70J.K07@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> vaughanj@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jake Vaughan) writes:
>
>>I have got a few more.  Remember the scene where Bruce Wilis is fighting the
>>guys hiding in the baggage conveyer area of the airport?  Wilis throws one
>>of the goons onto the conveyer where, when he gets to the top, he is crushed
>>by some machine.  Since when did airports crush baggage before they loaded
>>it onto the airplane?!
>
>The set of the baggage conveyer was purposely designed to be somesort of 
>"baggage hell" according to the director, Renny Harlin, himself. It wasn't
>designed with absolute "realism" in mind. And if you think it as a joke, 
>its quite funny (IMO).
>  [...comments on fuel tanks and fingerprints deleted...]
>More ?

One more... speaking of the baggage conveyor area...
What about the scene where Willis pulls out a golf club from a bag on
the conveyor to fight one of the terrorists.  What dummy would check
his golf clubs without a bag cover?  Was that another one of Harlin's
vision of "baggage hell"?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Michael Lau           | "The surest sign that intelligent life exists
                       |  elsewhere in the universe is that none of it
 mlau@mailbox.syr.edu  |  has contacted us."                   -Calvin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: kimp@rpi.edu (Phil Kim)
Subject: Roger Ebert's top 10 list (was Re: Movie Top 10 by...)
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 05:07:21 GMT

Keywords:
In article <Bz1qBM.BFy@access.digex.com> huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston) writes:
[stuff deleted]
>Thank you.  I have been eagerly awaiting the 1992 list.  The 1952, 1962, and
>1972 lists are published in _The Book Of Lists_.  I think that Roger Ebert
>included the 1982 list in one of his books along with comments and his own
>list (unfortunately I don't have it).
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Roger Ebert's Ten Greatest Films of All Time (1992)
(in alphabetical order)

Casablanca
Citizen Kane
Floating Weeds
Gates of Heaven
La Dolce Vita
Notorious
Raging Bull
The Third Man
28 Up
2001: A Space Odyssey
From: hist1261@waikato.ac.nz
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Stone's Latest Vietnam Film
Date: 15 Dec 92 10:51:16 +1300
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

There was a small piece in the paper this morning concerning Oliver Stone's
latest Vietnam film (called I think "Heaven and Earth") which is being 
filmed in Thailand at the moment.

As I mention from time to time I am attempting a thesis on Vietnam war films
and I would appreciate any and all information concerning this production,
which I have to admit I had not heard of at all until today.

Any help with be appreciated - e-mail as above.

Thanks in advance.

Richard.
From: kfree@fatcity.cts.com (Kenneth Freeman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: annoying nuances in films
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 06:58:01 PST
Organization: Fat City Software, San Diego, California

Harv@cup.portal.com (Harv R Laser) writes:

> >
> >   What always bothers me is when people order drinks or food and then
> >leave without paying for them.  I wish real life was like that. 
> 
> And when having a phone conversation in a film or tv show,
> no one ever says "goodbye" before they hang up. They just hang up.
> 
> Harv

 
Parking is no problem. There are no (900) TV commercials. 

-- 
kfree@fatcity.cts.com (Kenneth Freeman)
Fat City Software BBS -- (619) 621-6079
UUCP: ...crash.cts.com!fatcity!kfree  OR  ...telesoft.com!fatcity!kfree
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dabrowsa@zuni.ucs.indiana.edu (Andrew Dabrowski)
Subject: Re: DRACULA (plus another problem)
Summary: Is Harker infected?
Keywords: none
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 04:18:32 GMT


In 'Nosferatu' the Harker character ends up as Dracula's successor in
vampirism.  I wonder if Coppola is hinting at this possibility with
the mysterious (un)graying hair.  After all, we have only Harker's
own word that he didn't taste any of the female vamps' blood.

Andrew Dabrowski	Indiana U	Bloomington


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: PRISONER or FUGITIVE?
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 21:05:10 GMT

In article <BD.92Dec11131931@fluent.UUCP> bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU writes:
>egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:
>>In article <palomb.724000578@beagle> palomb@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Anthony Palombella) writes:
>>>
>>>	Wouldn't that be Number Sixty-Nine? B-)
>>
>>Actually, I believe the pun was intentional when they came up with the
>>characters on _Get Smart_.
>
>I thought her number was "99".  If I'm right, what's the pun?

Perhaps I'm mistaken.  The folks over at r.a.tv would know better.

In any case, I believe her number was supposed to be a pun on "69".
For clarification on _that_ one, I'd advise wandering down to alt.sex.





_Home Alone 2_ has now grossed over $90 million.

	** Macaulay Culkin: HE MUST BE STOPPED !!!! **
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: hypes@boi.hp.com (Gary Hypes)
Subject: Re: Blazing Saddles (was Re: Extended versions on T.V.)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:44:02 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard / Boise, Idaho
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

I've seen both versions, and I think the movie version is better.  The
other gags are pretty lame and they quickly begin to drag.  Great movie,
though.

-gary hypes -
From: ski@bach.udel.edu (The Tominator)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: More Stephen King movies
Date: 17 Dec 92 19:54:46 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware


THE DEAD ZONE has to be one of SKs best movies.  Did he direct
this one?

- The Tominator
From: jsp@uts.amdahl.com (James Preston)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: John Ford's Cavalry Trilogy
Date: 14 Dec 92 18:34:16 GMT
Reply-To: jsp@pls.amdahl.com
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA


Every time the move _Fort Apache_ plays on TV, the TV Guide blurb says that
this is the first of John Fords cavalry trilogy.  I finally watched the
whole thing a few months ago and enjoyed it, so now I'd like to see the
other two parts of the trilogy.  But I can't remember ever reading a
blurb for a movie that says it's the second or third part.  I was thinking
that _She Wore a Yellow Ribbon_ was one of them, and watching part of it
this weekend on TNT the two sure seem similar (the endings are almost 
exactly the same), but on the other hand John Wayne plays a different
character in each movie.

So can any kind soul out there help me out with this?  Just what are the
other two movies in the trilogy?

--James Preston

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: tlc9y@Virginia.EDU ("tara lou")
Subject: Re: 9 1/2 Weeks
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 14:54:22 GMT

firstly, this conversation has gone way beyond the movie and
into a heated debate....i don't know if it adequately fits the
movie section anymore..

secondly, it is really frightening to read what some people are
writing..i assumed a lot of that thinking died with the corset.
you do not have to be a lesbian or an abused survivor in order
to believe that our society dictates men's satisfaction over
women's..i see beer commercials that satisfy men's needs [i
drink beer, too], sportscar commercials [i would like one,
too], and many other instances where men's pleasure is the
aim..not women's.

this is not true all of the time as with any generalization,
and if you believe in an equal partnership with your lover than
all power to you...then, do not insult yourself with such crude
attacks towards others...

tabitha 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (Bakayaroo Banzai)
Subject: Re: Most SHOCKING film in my childhood
Organization: Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum GmbH, Hamburg
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 13:37:12 GMT

In article <BzA77z.23I@chinet.chi.il.us> koziarz@chinet.chi.il.us (Louis Koziarz) writes:
>My parents took me to see TOMMY when I was like four or five.  Scared the
>living hell out of me.  I never forgave them, nor will I watch it to this day.
>
Yeh, that scene where Ann Margaret smears herself with baked beans was a
real weenie-shrinker and I still have dreams about being attacked by
smiling Elton John monsters wearing 10-foot high platform shoes...
Now that's SCARY!!!

Of course it's nothing compared to the horror of actually having to 
listen to Keith Moon sing...

Jus' IMH facetious O, yuh unnerstand

*******************************************************************************
*  "Supernatural, perhaps...Baloney, perhaps not" - Bela Lugosi               *
*******************************************************************************
Matt Marchese	    The opinions expressed here are not those of my employer, *
Cray Research  	    my wife, my church, or myself...But they are the opinions *
DKRZ                of Elvis as revealved to me through the medium of my pet  *
Hamburg, Germany    hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...                             *
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer)
Subject: Re: THE THIRD MAN soundtrack on CD??
Reply-To: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer)
Organization: The John Fluke Mfg. Co.  /a.k.a. The Gizmonics Institute/
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:07:19 GMT

In <mdk2nrl@rpi.edu> kaminl@rebecca.its.rpi.edu (Matt Garretson) writes:

>Even if it's not the actual soundtrack, I'd like to get a disc that has
>some of that great zither music. Is there such a beast?

There was; London (or Decca, if you live in the U.K.) released a series of
CDs with film music on them.  One of them was titled THE THIRD MAN and had
the famed zither music on the first track.  However, I think the CD is
out-of-print.  However however, you might well find it in the soundtrack
anthology area of your local CD store.  (Or in the the classical section
anthology -- one of the annoying things is that London is a classical label,
and so they often toss the CDs there.)

I have the CD; the cover has a cameo drawing of Orson Welles hiding in an
alley. 

                            Honorable:      
                                Afflicted with an impediment in one's reach.
                                In legislative bodies, it is customary to
                                mention all members as honorable; as, "the
                                honorable gentleman is a scurvy cur."
---
                                        Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer
INTERNET:     moriarty@tc.fluke.COM
Manual UUCP:  {uunet, uw-beaver, sun, microsoft}!fluke!moriarty
CREDO:        You gotta be Cruel to be Kind...
                 **>> Keep circulating the tapes <<**
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies