HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: J.W.Harley@newcastle.ac.uk (Jon Harley)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Hello!
Date: 28 Sep 92 13:55:59 GMT
Organization: University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, NE1 7RU

adkisson@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Rob Adkisson) writes:

>Hello!!!!

Hi! Welcome!

>I am on the opposite side of most of the males who have posted, I
>am bi, but I tend to watch men more than women :-)

I wouldn't say "most". Maybe "many". There are plenty of us on both
sides of the Kinsey 3 watershed though, and many more who are on it.

>  The best advice
>I've heard, was said to me when I first started struggling with my
>bisexuality:  Enjoy it!  If you figure out later that you're gay,
>so be it, or if you're really strait (heaven forbid!) so be it!!! 

Of course. And anyway, people's sexualities change over time anyway, so
later on you may actually *be* gay. Enjoy what you *are* now. No-one
can foretell the future.

>A question:  Does anyone out there have any advice about long
>distance relationships????  My SO lives (and studies) in Germany
>and I'm stuck in the US and it really puts a strain on the
>relationship :-(  Any advice, comments, suggestions appreciated.

Tricky. My SO only lives 4 hours away, but as we're both students** that
is sufficient expense to mean that we can't see each other more than once
every few weeks (except in unusual circumstances), which is bad enough.

Practical advice? Buy shares in your phone company, it may make things
cheaper :-) Make sure your SO has net access so you can talk via e-mail
and, preferably, IRC :-)

Helpful eh? Not really, sorry. It's all new to me too really.


[ ** - I am only a student until 30th September, when my PhD funding runs
  out, if anyone is remotely interested. ]


//jon
   ___________________ ____ ________________________________________
  / -- Jonathan Harley \  /_   Could be an ever opening flower...  //    //  //
 / J.W.Harley@ncl.ac.uk \/ /  It's the beginning of               // // //////
/_Phone:UK 091 222 8504__\/__a new love inside________________///////////  //
From: zzaascd@hpa.ee.man.ac.uk (Colin Dente)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: A nagging question
Date: 28 Sep 92 08:15:53 GMT
Organization: Electrical Engineering Dept Manchester University

In article <n1xqb4vc@cck.coventry.ac.uk> idx009@cck.coventry.ac.uk
(the Crisco Kid) writes:
> Hehehehe... silly lad, you've just given me all the info I need to creep
> up on you and *POUNCE*!

Silly?  I can think of few things better than being pounced upon by
you, Kay.

> >bingo!
> Actually, that wasn't quite what I'd though of visiting you for, but...
I'm *sure* we could find something more interesting to do... then
again, watching a bingo caller play with his balls in public might be
fun...

> de gustibus, hey?

I must say that I've never really agreed with the "non est
disputandum" bit - I mean, there are some issues of taste which are
too important not to be disputed, or at least discussed:  For
instance, does alcohol taste better when drunk from Alex's navel, or
licked off Dave's chest?  Is Brie or Boursin the better topping for
Kay's nipples?  These questions, and more, *need* answering...

Colin
(Trying to pretend that he knows some latin.  For those with a less
extensive reference library than I, "De gustibus non est
disputandum" means "there's no disputing about tastes").

  Colin Dente                     | JANET: dente@uk.ac.manchester
  Manchester Computing Centre     | ARPA:  dente@manchester.ac.uk
  University of Manchester, UK    | UUCP:  ...!mcsun!ukc!manchester!dente
             	   ... I can't even *think* straight ...
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: crj10@phx.cam.ac.uk (Clive Jones)
Subject: Re: Michael's visit to the UK
Telephone-Messages: +44 223 33 4900
Address: Christ's College, Cambridge CB2 3BU, ENGLAND.
Organization: 6am Digital Playground
X-Furry-Character: Gerald_Duck
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 01:06:51 GMT

In article <1992Sep17.024040.17827@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tweaver@nyx.cs.du.edu (T.C.Weaver) writes:
>I should maybe ask my friends in that scene when the next Skin 2 party is?

Skin Two? *THE* Skin Two?

I've just come back after a long summer's holiday away from
university. Am I missing any talk about Skin Two on soc.bi? If not,
why not? (-8

--Clive.
From: crj10@phx.cam.ac.uk (Clive Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: expressing anger
Date: 27 Sep 92 02:36:50 GMT
Organization: 6am Digital Playground
Address: Christ's College, Cambridge CB2 3BU, ENGLAND.
X-Furry-Character: Gerald_Duck
Telephone-messages: +44 223 33 4900

In article <1992Sep24.004156.22488@midway.uchicago.edu> h431@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <9b6nzhk.lile@netcom.com> lile@netcom.com (Lile Elam) writes:
>>cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:
>>
>>>Can anybody point me in the right direction to books/articles/etc about
>>>the expression of anger, especially about how to express anger in
>>>non-destructive (to ourselves or others) ways.

Hmm. I could do with some suggestions on this myself. Actually,
arguments are more my scene - I grew up with BIG arguments every few
weeks, and it's a little hard to adapt to not really laying into
someone every so often now. Playing a lot of music helps, but it seems
a bit artificial - more of a postponement of a need than a replacement.

>>There is a great book called "The Dance of Anger". Have forgotton the 
>>author but it's a good book.
>
>I think her name's Lerner.  It is a good book.  [...]

Yup. Cataloguing information from Cambridge University Library:

 Author:         Lerner, Harriet Goldhor
 Title:          The dance of anger: a woman's guide to changing the
                 patterns of intimate relationships; Harriet Goldhor Lerner
                 Wellingborough: Grapevine, 1990, c1985
                 xii,239p; 22cm, pbk
 Notes:          Originally published: New York : Harper & Row, 1985
                 Includes index
 Subjects:       Interpersonal relations
                 Women--Psychology

None of this is very soc.bi, is it, by the way? (Not that I'm
complaining...)

--Clive.
Xref: sparky soc.bi:13312 news.groups:18573
From: tal@plts.uucp (Tom Limoncelli)
Newsgroups: soc.bi,news.groups
Subject: Re: Kendall Square bi lunch on Wed., Sep. 23
Date: 24 Sep 1992 21:19:43 -0400
Organization: P.L.T.S., North Plainfield, New Jersey, USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: plts.uucp

In <CARLTON.92Sep20214432@husc11.harvard.edu> carlton@husc11.harvard.edu (david carlton) writes:

>There will be a bi lunch in Thai's restaurant at One Kendall Square at
>1 PM on Wednesday, September 23.  This is continuing the series of biS

Well, how did it go?

Tom
-- 
Tom Limoncelli -- tal@plts.uucp (home) -- tal@warren.mentorg.com (work)
"Families should be more like the Waltons instead of the Simpsons" -G. Bush;
"But we *are* like the Waltons: we're waiting for the Depression to end,
too!" -B. Simpson 8/20;    S7/2 b+ g l+ y z- n++ o++ x++ a-- u+ v+ j+ PIG8/5
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: cjohnson@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Coe Salzgeber)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Some fears and doubts about my sexuality
Date: 30 Sep 92 23:57:25 GMT
Organization: Cow Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA

Orc:
  >|>|>Dating sucks dead bunnies through a straw.)
Kay:
  >|>|What's so ukky about dating?
Orc:
  >|>   Everything.  And *Everything.  (I could write a book, but then I'd
  >|>be in a very bad mood....)
  >[Orcish disapproval of dating deleted]

orc@amber.uchicago.edu (David Parsons) said...
>jsb16@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jennifer S Broekman) writes:
>|I dunno... I can see myself 'dating' a woman from within my current motos
>|relationship. And IMNSBE (in my not-so-broad experience), seeing a motos can
>|be as easy as sticking one's tongue (and just what can you *do* with that
>|tongue, he said.....) or being hungry enough to beg for macaroni and cheese.
>
>  Different people, different experiences.  I agree, it can be simple
>to see a motos - I've seen, in a distressingly platonic fashion, various
>women over the years, all via the mechanism of dating. There's seems to
>be a lot of preparation involved, and a lot of wondering about what will
>happen, and a wee bit more than the RDA of stress.  
>[experimentally verifying bisexuality or not, with and without dating]

First, let's make a distinction between "dating" and "dating".  There's
"dating", as in seeing someone, or having a relationship, which i would 
think Orc would not say sucks dead bunnies through a straw, and then there's
"dating" as in going out on a date in the standard, middle-america sense.
(or middle-other-countries too, i would assume)

I find it interesting when people talk about dating - i have never done
the traditional dating thang, as in two people of appropriate sexes who
don't know each other very well arranging to meet for some structured
activity, with the anticipation of the possibility of a romantic
relationship.  Seems to me that it would be stressful, and not have a
very good chance of success.  I guess it must have a decent chance of
success, though, or people would have given up on it, wouldn't they?

I have always thought it might be amusing, once or twice, from an
anthropological sense, but a date just doesn't seem like the best way
to lead up to any sort of interaction, from a one-time fling to a
long-term committment.

Reminds me of the closest thing to a date that i've been on - it was with
a gay man, when i was in a monag. relationship with someone else.  We 
noticed and commented on the fact that in a superficial sense, it seemed 
like a date.  I got to hear the woman with the most beautiful voice in the
world sing Gershwin's "Summertime".  Made my heart melt all over the floor.

*sigh*
-Coe
-- 
cjohnson@nyx.calpoly.edu
From: muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: communication
Date: 30 Sep 92 08:53:17
Organization: Natural Language Incorporated
	<1992Sep19.120402.13853@tfs.com>
	<MUFFY.92Sep19080608@remarque.berkeley.edu>
	<1992Sep23.225804.144163@zeus.calpoly.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: cjohnson@zeus.calpoly.edu's message of 23 Sep 92 22:58:04 GMT

In article <1992Sep23.225804.144163@zeus.calpoly.edu> cjohnson@zeus.calpoly.edu (Coe Salzgeber) writes:
>muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) said...
>[be interested in the other person]

>One thing that i've learned is that it's okay, even a good thing, to
>ask people questions about themselves.

This is good advice, but it is very difficult.  My SO is very very good
at this and very successful with it.  Unfortunately, I'm so shy about it
that if I'm around while he's doing it, half the time I'm so uncomfort-
able I want to run away.  Even if he and the other person are perfectly
comfortable.  Sometimes the other person *isn't* so comfortable, but
they seem to kind-of like it anyway - and they usually answer.

>>I don't think it's so much the picking up part, but the meeting part
>>that I need to work on...*smile*.

>How is picking up women different from picking up men?>

Beats me.  For all I know, it is exactly the same.  I don't know how to
pick up men, either.  They just seem to appear fairly frequently.  This
is quite likely because I spend most of my time with (predominantly
male) computer people.  It seems like most of them don't know how to
meet women, either...*smile*.  It's getting better slowly, though.

>I guess one issue that's specific to a woman meeting another woman
>is the issue of offending her if she's not interested... again, if
>you're getting to know her as a friend, you should have a chance to
>find out her opinions before it's, um, relevant *grin*

Actually, I would be quite happy being friends with (and not pursuing)
anyone I am interested in.  The "real" problem is that I don't even meet
that many women, and I don't know how to get to be friends with the ones
I do.

Muffy
--

Muffy Barkocy                               muffy@mica.berkeley.edu
~Little round planet/in a big universe/sometimes it looks blessed/
 sometimes it looks cursed/Depends on what you look at, obviously/
 But even more it depends on the way that you see~ - Bruce Cockburn
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: A nagging question
Date: 30 Sep 92 17:59:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Sep30.175952.24111
Reply-To: Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde)
Followup-To: soc.bi
Organization: Ministry of Silly Walks
Originator: lunde@casbah.acns.nwu.edu

In article <1992Sep29.053745.616@leland.Stanford.EDU> mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd) writes:
>Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde) writes:
>: In article <6244@m1.cs.man.ac.uk> zzaascd@hpa.ee.man.ac.uk 
>:  (Colin Dente) writes:
>: >does alcohol taste better when drunk from Alex's navel, or
>: >licked off Dave's chest?  Is Brie or Boursin the better topping for
>: >Kay's nipples?  These questions, and more, *need* answering...
>: 
>: Yes! I suggest that these questions be looked into by a panel of 
>: experts from various specialties, in order to develop a broad
>: consensus across disciplines.
>
>Ooh, ooh, ooh [Mike waves his hand in the air]
>I volunteer for the whisky-tasting (I'll even provide :-), or could
>make do with the pepper-cheese, esp. if comparing Colin and Albert ...

Now, now, the participants in this investigation must maintain a
proper detachment and objectivity. <pay no attention to the low
moaning in the background.>

The scientific method requires that we reproduce each experiment many
times, paying rigorous attention to the methods of our discipline.
<If you'd spread a little Brie a bit lower to the right...ahaa...>

Carefully controlled double-blind tests ware needed to avoid artifacts
in the data. <Perhaps a black silk blindfold...>

;) ;)

-- 
 Albert Lunde         | Interfaith  |     *Y*Y*      "A branch on the
 Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu |  Bisexual   |      *Y*        tree of life"
 alunde@nuacvm.bitnet |  Feminist   |.......|.........................
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: idx009@cck.coventry.ac.uk (the Crisco Kid)
Subject: Re: More fun photos
Organization: Eris's Restaurant
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 20:08:32 GMT

In article <1992Sep26.185353.828@leland.Stanford.EDU> mlloyd@westmark.Stanford.EDU (Mike Lloyd) writes:
>fenthe@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu writes:
>: Kay writes:
>: [on scanning]
>: >Anyone interested?
>: 
>:  Yes! (yes, yes, and so forth).
>
>Seconded! (and thirded, fourthed, and ad nauseamed).
>I think there's little doubt that there's a demand for a piccie
>source (pick your format - I'll have to learn what to do with it
>whatever it is) to keep the far-flung soc.bi community in
>ocular contact.  The indebtedness would be considerable ....

OK, OK, in that case I volunteer...  I'll start scanning in selected
stuff from Judith's photographs of the Norwich Conference soon.  When
I've got a few, I'll let people know where they are.  If there's anyone
who *doesn't* want their piccies on display (Sara?), please mail me
and tell me.

Will 8-bit GIFs / JPEGs do?  they're so much smaller than 24bit,
and I'll use a good compressor on them...


				Kay
-- 
6'2", dark short hair, blue eyes, bisexual and horny as ....
Kay Dekker, Dept of Industrial Design, Coventry University, Coventry UK
37 Old Winnings Road, Keresley Village, Coventry   |B0 f t+ g++ k++! s+ e r p!
Phone: +44 203 838668 (work) +44 203 337865 (home) |Deflowerer-of-innocents
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: dwells@lonestar.utsa.edu (Darren . Wells)
Subject: Re: Wow
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 20:24:49 GMT

In article <19uni5INN377@agate.berkeley.edu> rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport) writes:
>
>Karl H. Thiessen (karlht@ocf.berkeley.edu) ... and if he wasn't a friend,
>I'd mention that what he looks like, but I don't want him to get his mailbox
>_too_ overburdened with flirts ... so I won't *grin*
>
>Hi Karl!! Are you sure about this?
>

Hell of a time to ask him.  *grin*

Darren, suffering from sleep deprivation of a lesser degree than
 he is accustomed to


Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: moh2@quads.uchicago.edu (Kateri/Mary Anne)
Subject: Poem:  please e-mail comments.
Reply-To: moh2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 22:58:39 GMT

I Am

I am a college freshman from Connecticut,
longing for green hills and autumn gold,
as I face a barren Chicago winter.
I huddle into a shell, braced against icy wind,
glad of my boyfriend's warm arm around my shoulders.

I am the respected mayor of a small town in Tennessee,
relieving the boredom by frequent trips to the local poolhall...
and even more frequent trips to what passes for a red-light district,
in a conservative town.
My wife has slept in another room for six years now,
and our children have stopped worrying.

I am the up-and-coming boy in the copy room,
always on the alert for a hot story,
working long hours in the hopes someone will notice my brillliance,
glad my roommate has dinner waiting when I get home.
A rommate who can cook...what more could I ask?

I am your cleaning lady, a hunched Hispanic woman.
I mumble broken english at you during the day,
but go home at night to write poetry in spanish,
while my son reads Shakespeare for class.
My husband died in an accident last week.

I am bisexual.

The college student occasionally has fond memories
of a winter evening shared with a red-headed girlfriend.

The mayor spends his nights in a certain room,
with a certain world-weary young man.

The copy boy's roommate is also his lover,
A husky blond ex-quarterback, who wants to play in a band.

And the cleaning lady visits on Saturdays
with the receptions down the hall, who has also lost a husband.

I am everywhere.

*****

M.A. Mohanraj
September 28, 1992
-- 
The autumn leaves are falling like rain.
Although my neighbors are all barbarians,
And you, you are a thousand miles away,
There are always two cups at my table.		 - A T'ang Dynasty poem
Xref: sparky soc.bi:13206 soc.women:17136 soc.men:17048 alt.sex:31217 alt.feminism:1747 soc.singles:26647
From: jclark@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (John Clark)
Newsgroups: soc.bi,soc.women,soc.men,alt.sex,alt.feminism,soc.singles
Subject: Re: real men and women
Date: 29 Sep 92 07:21:01 GMT
Followup-To: soc.bi
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <1992Sep21.201748.22481@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant) writes:
+The following was posted on rec.nude.  It has nothing to do with
+rec.nude.  Rec.nude is not about sex or gender.  It is about doing
+ordinary things without clothes on.  Please do not post discussions of
+sex and gender on rec.nude unless they refer to nude recreation (other

Yes, everyone knows that nudists deal with each other as Platonic
Ideals, i.e. architypical forms rather than real sexed individuals
with fuzzy hair and floppy bodies; no cave shadow watchers here.
-- 

John Clark
jclark@ucsd.edu
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: yal@cltr.uq.oz.au (Yvette Lian)
Subject: Re: Multiple Orientations?
Organization: Centre for Language Teaching and Research, Uni of Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 03:09:08 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.130738.24256@cltr.uq.OZ.AU> some idiot writes:
>Hmm.  There is a difference between examining one's feelings, emotions
>and behaviour in order to accept them, and saying "I have sexual preference
>X because...". [etc ad nauseum]

Oh god!  I don't believe I wrote this... let me try again.
There's a difference between being happy with one's sexual preference for
the sake of being happy with it, and actively *choosing* a preference after
extended self-analysis... 

I'm not sure that that's come out the way I wanted it to come out either,
but... well... yeh.

Later...
--
Yvette Lian
yal@lingua.cltr.uq.oz.au or s315948@parasol.cs.uq.oz.au (student account)
FIDO: 3:640/352 
IRC nick: Maxine2
From: crj10@phx.cam.ac.uk (Clive Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: ECSD and soc.bi
Date: 27 Sep 92 02:03:44 GMT
Organization: 6am Digital Playground
Telephone-Messages: +44 223 33 4900
Address: Christ's College, Cambridge CB2 3BU, ENGLAND.
X-Furry-Character: Gerald_Duck

From ~crj10/News/soc/bi/KILL:

  /^From: ecsd@tfs.com/h:j
  /: *ECSD and soc.bi/:j

I only got back to soc.bi today, after being away all summer. This
evening, while I sifted through an 800-message backlog, I have hit a
few firsts with my use of Usenet:
  - First time I've ever started to dislike someone just for what they
    say and how they say it, in electronic form.
  - First time I've ever taken a profound dislike to someone having
    never met them, and having only been exposed to evidence of their
    existence for a mere four hours.
  - First time I've ever killfiled a PERSON (I hope it works - I had
    to man rn to check the details of how to do it...)
  - First time I've ever followed up a thread at the same time as
    killing it.
  - First time I've ever really felt like flaming someone good and
    hard.

So - feel free to use my name in any or all lists of people who seek
to avoid having to read what this ECSD person posts to soc.bi . This
is the first time I've ever held such a low opinion of someone's
posting, so I don't take this lightly. (Yes, I do know Ted Kaldis...)

Anyway, I know soc.bi isn't *supposed* to be flirty and huggy and
secure-feeling, but I much preferred it when it was. That side of
things is being marginalised now - I wouldn't mind it being
marginalised by well-maintained discussion of bisexual issues, but the
current tone of debate is not my idea of fun. )-8

Well, that's my 2p on the subject. I've killed this thread - if you
*really* want to follow it up with me, then send e-mail, but I don't
promise to reply to it!

Sigh,

--Clive.
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: jsb16@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jennifer S Broekman)
Subject: Re: Some fears and doubts about my sexuality
Reply-To: jsb16@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jennifer S Broekman)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 21:19:57 GMT

In article <1992Sep26.070407.15182@midway.uchicago.edu> 
orc@pell.chi.il.us writes:
>In article <25xqb6xv@cck.coventry.ac.uk> 
 idx009@cck.coventry.ac.uk (the Crisco Kid) writes:
>|In article <1992Sep23.052007.13368@midway.uchicago.edu> 
  orc@sybase.com (David Parsons) writes:
>|>Dating sucks dead bunnies through a straw.)
>|What's so ukky about dating?

>   Everything.  And *Everything.  (I could write a book, but then I'd
>be in a very bad mood....)

>   If you're not extroverted (and I, until quite recently, was most
>definitely not) the whole business of _asking_ someone out to do
>something, and all the goddamn rituals that custom has piled on top
>of what's supposed to be appropriate behavior, expectations, and
>whatnot, is about as painful as a root canal, except it gets you in
>the heart.  Dating meshes very well with the traditional family
>value of monogamy and no sex before marriage to make the whole
>business of seeing a motos (because, as traditional family values
>tell us, motss relationships are icky and horrible and we should
>all be dead because we're perverts) as simple as besieging
>Jerusalem.

I dunno... I can see myself 'dating' a woman from within my current motos
relationship. And IMNSBE (in my not-so-broad experience), seeing a motos can
be as easy as sticking one's tongue (and just what can you *do* with that
tongue, he said.....) or being hungry enough to beg for macaroni and cheese.

-jenneke

My biggest budget problem is food:
My stomach wants four meals a day.
My budget wants two.
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: jcarroll@bach.udel.edu (Royal J Carroll)
Subject: Re: Wow
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:25:51 GMT

In article <19uk2iINN2tj@agate.berkeley.edu> rsr@soda.berkeley.edu (Roy S. Rapoport) writes:
>
>Today was ... incredible.  I'm sitting here with a wide grin on my face, and
>I'm feeling truly happy for the first time in about two weeks. 
>
... This may not be the _best_ use of soc.bi, but ... I wanted
>to post.  So there.  :)
>

I can't think of a better use than to share a wonderful moment.

(BTW, I've been described as extremely huggable, so you can use me for
practice. <wink> <flirt> <wink>)

*hugs*

-James

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
If I could only reach you/If I could make you smile
If I could only reach you/That would really be a breakthough
-Queen, "Breakthru"=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=jcarroll@brahms.udel.edu-
Newsgroups: soc.bi