HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Organization: Princeton University, Network Systems, Class. 56
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 16 Oct 1992 09:43:31 -0400
From:         gettes@PRINCETON.EDU
Subject:      Re: FAL V2R1 recursive error
              16 Oct 92 08:22:42 -0400. <9210161246.AA29359@Princeton.EDU>

On Fri, 16 Oct 92 08:22:42 -0400 tosdrst@ge1vm.schdy.ge.com said:
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> From:
> Subject: FAL V2R1 recursive error
>  Hello List,
>  Any ideas on what this recusive error is... TCPIP looping at 40% CPU..
>   'wrapupdatadelivered     63   00073212  tcnotif_notify'
>  Thanks,
>  Don Smith,GE-SMC
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >From The Desk of Don Smith.

A known bug that has a fix (I do not know the ptf number) but it
is certainly on the service tapes for 2.1 and incorporated into 2.2.

/mrg
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 12 Oct 1992 09:16:00 EDT
From:         "George_J.Haddad" <GEORGEH@MSU.BITNET>

Your local branch office should be able to provide pricing info for
this (assuming you have a local IBM branch office). There are
also  a lot of knowledgable folks who read this mailing list who
may be able to answer specific questions. We run a 9221 (succsessor to
the 937x) with the integrated Ethernet adapter. We have had no problems
but we did learn (from this mail list) that NFS is not supported with
this device.

> Hello anybody !
> Tell me please, address of IBM Were i may get consult about
> buying Ethernet adapter for IBM/9375  and ask a lot of questions about
> their product.
>                                                      Artyem M.Beljaev
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 16:25:21 CST
From:         Bill Harvey <HARVEY@WUVMD.WUSTL.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Cum PTF tape for HTCP221

On Sun, 4 Oct 1992 23:13:40 EDT, Bill Rubin <RUBIN@YKTVMV.BITNET> said:
<...>
>>                                         ANNOUNCEMENT SUMMARY
>>                                         ____________________
<...>

>> CICS SOCKETS INTERFACE  C  LANGUAGE  SUPPORT:    MVS  TCP/IP
>> V2R2.1  now offers C Language support for the CICS to TCP/IP
>> Application Programming Interface.
<...>
>>       Cobol and Assembler  language  support  for  the  CICS
>> Sockets  Interface  was  provided  previously  in MVS TCP/IP
>> Version 2 Release 2.

I know very little about MVS, even less about VSE, and still less about
CICS running on either platform.

But we're running CICS on VSE as a guest on VM.  And lots of people
would like to provide TCP/IP applications to their CICS/VSE users.
I've been telling them that this is simply not possible.  But after
reading the statement above, a crazy idea struck me:  How possible
would it be to adapt the CICS socket interface to permit CICS/VSE
applications to utilize TCP/IP running on the host VM?

I probably wouldn't understand the details, so answers like "That would
be a ***big*** waste of your time" would be better than nothing.
Mostly, I'd just like to get a feel for how crazy that idea really is.

Any information would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Bill Harvey
From: MEINECKE@DMDTU11.URZ.TU-MAGDEBURG.DE (Peter Meinecke)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Re: Name Server Requirements
Date: 14 Oct 92 12:36:12 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
              13 Oct 1992 17:10:59 CDT from <ZCVS1@ADM.ANGELO.EDU>

On Tue, 13 Oct 1992 17:10:59 CDT Colegate V. Spinks said:
>
>On Tue, 13 Oct 1992 10:32:39 EDT Fran Hensler said:
>>I have heard that in order to run a name server in VM TCP/IP
>>you must also have VM SQL installed.  Is this true?
>
>If you want to run a domain name server you under VM you must have SQL.
>
>+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>: Colegate Spinks, Analyst/Network Specialist, Angelo State University :
>: 2601 WEST AVENUE N, BOX 11020, SAN ANGELO, TEXAS  76901              :
>: Internet:ZCVS@ADM.ANGELO.EDU, Voice:915-942-2333, Fax:915-942-2109   :
>+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>: Have a nice day (Warning: This offer expires at midnight, some       :
>: restrications and limitations may exist, not valid in all 50 states, :
>: void where prohibited by law, and is non-transferable)               :
>+----------------------------------------------------------------------+


No, you can run a caching-only nameserver without sql.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Peter Meinecke
 URZ TU Magdeburg             Phone: *49/391/55922991
 Universitaetsplatz 2        Bitnet: MEINECKE@DMDTU11
 O-3010 Magdeburg          Internet: MEINECKE@DMDTU11.URZ.TU-MAGDEBURG.DE
 Germany
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.30]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 10:20:02 MET
From:         Eva Hocks <hocks@RZHP9A.GSI.DE>
Subject:      SMTP aliases for MVS

> > SMTP configuration file on AIX allows to specify an aliases file to map
 userID
> >  such as
> > postamaster: root . How can that be done on the MVS SMTP configuration ? I
 wou
> >  like to map
> > user names to cryptic MVS logon IDs.
> > Eva
>
> Does it get boring if I say that UCLA/Mail is a good solution to this?
>
> /Leonard
No, it never gets boring to talk about UCLA/Mail, THD runs the UCLA/Mail400
for several years now sucessfully. I only want IBM to offer a solution for
those, who don't/won't run the mailer,like GSI. And I want SMTP on MVS to have
 the
same features as the UNIX version, it makes it easier for the mailer
administrators.
Eva.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 9 Oct 1992 15:30:39 EDT
From:         Mark Bodenstein <MAB@CORNELLC.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: REXEC tips

On Fri, 9 Oct 1992 10:18:00 EDT George_J.Haddad said:
>We are running FAL 2.2 undev VM/ESA 1.1 but have never enabled the REXEC
>service. We are interested in doing so. Any tips/caveats/advice/suggestions
>from sites running this would be greatly appreciated. ...

For one thing, don't set up any anonymous slave servers (unless you want
to give away free cycles and don't care about security.)

Mark
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 9 Oct 1992 15:37:22 EDT
From:         Keith Campbell <SYSKEC@GSU.EDU>
Subject:      RS/6000 Channel Attachfor TCP/IP

     Has anyone on the net used an RS/6000 as their LAN access method for either
 VM or MVS.  I'm can't get the $&_&@# thing to configure correctly or come
 online to MVS.  I would like to speak to someone who has successfully
 gotten one to work.  Offline of course.
From: rubinm@WATSON.IBM.COM (Bill Rubin)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Re: Version 221 LPA modules
Date: 17 Oct 92 02:21:28 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

ormond higgins <OHIGGINS%JHUVM.BITNET@pucc.Princeton.EDU> writes:

>  Can someone out there tell me if the LPA modules for MVS are downward
>  compatible???  The module names are the same as the version 1 modules
>  that we are running with.  If I copy the new modules into LPA library
>  will the old stuff run until we switch over???  The module names from
>  version 1 are the same except for one ALIAS name.  MVPYSSM4 exists in
>  the old library, but not in the 221 version.  If I copy the new modules
>  into the library, I will have an ALIAS with no real ENTRY POINT.  What
>  can I do about that???

The LPA modules have to match up with the rest of the platform code in
TCPLIB.  So, if you are running the old code (do you really mean version
1, or version 2 release 1?)  then if you're at a current level of service
you SHOULD be ok running the old code under the new LPA.  For the module
in question, I'd check your SMP level for MVPYSSM in the old system.  If
it's dated late 1991, or 1992, then you should be ok.  The need for the
MVPYSSM4 alias was deleted in service around that time frame but we never
actually deleted it at that point because it would have been too difficult
to do.

I would recommend getting some system time and try it for yourself.  In
theory, you could try 2.2.1 on the old LPA base and see if it works, it's
probably easier than the other way around.

Bill Rubin
IBM TJ Watson Research
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 11:15:10 CET
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was K000160@ALIJKU11
From:         Wilfried Maschtera <Maschtera@EDVZ.UNI-LINZ.AC.AT>
Subject:      Re: RSMTP aliases definition on MVS

On Wed, 7 Oct 1992 16:30:00 PDT Leonard D Woren said:
>On Wed, 7 Oct 1992 17:24:11 MET, Eva Hocks <hocks@RZHP9A.GSI.DE> said:
>> SMTP configuration file on AIX allows to specify an aliases file to map
>userID
>>  such as
>> postamaster: root . How can that be done on the MVS SMTP configuration ? I
>wou
>>  like to map
>> user names to cryptic MVS logon IDs.
>> Eva
>
>Does it get boring if I say that UCLA/Mail is a good solution to this?
>
In VM you can use nicknames facility (SMTP NAMES). Check whether there is
a similar feature for MVS.

WIlfried
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"IBMTCP-L@pucc.princeton.edu"
X-VMS-Cc: SEB1525
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 9 Oct 1992 08:19:27 -0400
From:         Steve Bacher <seb@DRAPER.COM>
Subject:      FTP RACF PTF (was: RE: Misc MVS questions)

On Thu, 8 Oct 1992 15:34:46 EDT, Ron Lane <RONLANE@YKTVMV.BITNET> said:
 > Base 2.2 was supposed to eliminate the need for FTP to be in OPERATNS

 > authority, but a PTF was required to include Rename and Delete.  With

 > the PTF, FTP can run under any userid, since the TCB is now changed
 > to point to the RACF ACEE of the userid that logged on for all
 > functions.

Then Bill Rubin said:

>Let me elaborate on Ron's post and answer your question.  Obviously, there
>is no PTF to fix this for MVS 2.2 as there ARE no PTFs for MVS 2.2. We did
>intend not to require OPERATNS authority in MVS 2.2, but some of the code
>didn't get out, so it is still required.  We fixed the code shortly after
>2.2 shipped, and intended to ship it as a PTF to that release.  But we
>didn't.
>
>However, I am pleased to say that the fix *is* in the base MVS 2.2.1
>release.

I love it when IBM sneaks in "minor changes" like that as PTF's.  How is
that going to impact us ACF2 users?  No doubt the elaborate steps we took
to get FTP and ACF2 to behave well together will have to be gone over
pretty carefully when this PTF makes its way onto our system.

 - seb
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
X-Acknowledge-To: <19016007%SBAC@NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 9 Oct 1992 10:32:20 EST
From:         "Cromer, Dan" <19016007%SBAC@NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU>
Subject:      RS/6000 vs BusTech for VM TCP/IP

Greetings all,
     I have plans for installing TCP/IP under our VM/ESA (9121-210)
system.  I had tentatively planned on purchasing a BTI system for
connection to our token-ring WAN that connects 40 sites to one RS/6000,
but I'm also considering using an additional RS/6000 with a
channel attachment.  I'd appreciate recommendations for or against
the RS/6000 approach, aside from the cost issue.
     My assumptions in favor of the RS/6000 are:
a.  Offload cycles from the mainframe.
b.  Allow transfer of VM spool items to the RS/6000 for off-site
printing using a 4033 with printer at each site.  We already use
one 4033/4224 printer combination for remote printing off of the
current RS/6000.
     I'm not really ready to be the first in the world to try
using the RS/6000 for front-end to VM TCP/IP, so I'd appreciate
very much some words of wisdom from others who'd already done
it.
Dan
--
Daniel H. Cromer, Jr.  Manager, Systems & Programming
School Board of Alachua County, Gainesville, Florida
19016007%SBAC@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu
Organization: Princeton University, Network Systems, Class. 56
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 11:25:02 -0400
From:         gettes@PRINCETON.EDU
Subject:      Re: Tcp lpr rscs line driver
              07 Oct 92 11:14:00 -0400. <9210071515.AA22983@Princeton.EDU>

On Wed, 07 Oct 92 11:14:00 -0400 fpeoc@cuvmb.columbia.edu said:
> Does any body out  there know of a rscs driver to send  print output to a
> lprd server?
>
> Frank P. Esposito

for RSCS V3 there is the SVP line driver sample package that comes
with the product that may be helpful (as it does just this). However,
test multiple copies to make sure it works properly. I had a problem
and I am unsure as to whether IBM has corrected the problem in the
product yet. I use this driver for exactly the purpose you intend.

/mrg
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 15:34:46 EDT
From:         Ron Lane <RONLANE@YKTVMV.BITNET>
Subject:      re: Misc MVS questions

 1)Does MVPSQL server-code shipped with 2.2 run on 2.1(MVS/ESA)? There is
  some indication in CSSF that it will, but the userid is not propagated
  correctly. Is this TCP or SQL related?

You must apply maintenance to MVPSQL in 2.1 to bring it up to the level
where the userid is propogated properly.  In base 2.1, the
connection to DB2 was done under the FTP server's Userid, with the
maintenance (and of course in 2.2), the connection is done under the
userid of the user that logged onto FTP.

 2)Cover letter says TCP 2.2 does not require OPER SPECIAL authority?
   What authority does it require?

Base 2.2 was supposed to eliminate the need for FTP to be in OPERATNS
authority, but a PTF was required to include Rename and Delete.  With
the PTF, FTP can run under any userid, since the TCB is now changed
to point to the RACF ACEE of the userid that logged on for all
functions.

Ron Lane
TCP/IP Development
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 9 Oct 1992 10:18:00 EDT
From:         "George_J.Haddad" <GEORGEH@MSU.BITNET>
Subject:      REXEC tips

We are running FAL 2.2 undev VM/ESA 1.1 but have never enabled the REXEC
service. We are interested in doing so. Any tips/caveats/advice/suggestions
from sites running this would be greatly appreciated. If you prefer, you can
reply to me privately (GEORGEH @ MSU.EDU)

Thanks in advance.
From: DAVID@NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU (David Nessl)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Re: LPSERVE
Date: 13 Oct 92 16:52:43 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
              13 Oct 1992 10:21:05 +0200 from <VSBENZI@WEIZMANN.WEIZMANN.AC.IL>

On Tue, 13 Oct 1992 10:21:05 +0200 Benzi mizrahi said:
>there was some discussion going on about the banner pages produced by
>LPSERVE. What I am interested  in is accounting.
>When I print on an RSCS printed, that is also served by LPSERVE,
>the pages printed are accounted for LPSERVE. Is there a way to
>do accounting for the original , sometimes remote, userid?
>Also I'd like to reject remote user whose  userid doesn't match
>the userid on VM where LPSERVE runs.

I have some LPSERVE printer exits that accomplish all of this.
Correct accounting is accomplished by setting the alternate userid
using the ALTERNAT EXEC supplied by for use by FTPSERVE.  The files
are available via anonymous ftp to nerix.nerdc.ufl.edu in
/pub/VM/LPSERVE.   -david

David Nessl -- Coordinator, Computer Systems (systems programmer)
Internet:  david@ufl.edu          |Northeast Regional Data Center
BITNET:    david@nervm            |112 SSRB, University of Florida
Telephone: 904-392-2061           |Gainesville, FL 32611    USA
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Slippery Rock University - Computer Center
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 13 Oct 1992 10:32:39 EDT
From:         Fran Hensler <FJH@SRU.BITNET>
Subject:      Name Server Requirements

I have heard that in order to run a name server in VM TCP/IP
you must also have VM SQL installed.  Is this true?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 17:54:00 PDT
From:         Michael Stein <CSYSMAS@UCLAMVS.BITNET>
Subject: Re: RSMTP aliases definition on MVS

> On Wed, 7 Oct 1992 16:30:00 PDT Leonard D Woren said:
> >
> >Does it get boring if I say that UCLA/Mail is a good solution to this?
> >
> >/Leonard
>
> Only to those of us who run JES3 and can't run UCLA/Mail.

Is that still true?  Here's my comment from a while ago (Jan 92):

> I don't know of *anyone* who has tried UCLA/Mail with the JES3
> SNA/NJE support.  Has anyone actually *tried* this?  Is JES3
> NJE/SNA really that different?
>
> I always assumed that using the SNA/NJE interface would allow
> UCLA/Mail to work with both JES2 and JES3, SNA being IBM's
> "official" communication protocol(s).
>
> At least until I asked someone at JES2 LVL2 "well then, how does
> JES3 do it?"  and got the reply that JES3 didn't support SNA/NJE.
> This was a while ago.
>
> PS: We had one site here at UCLA which ran JES3 & UCLA/Mail,
>     however they did not have the JES3 SNA/NJE support.  Since
>     all UCLA sites are VTAM connected they connected their copy
>     of UCLA/Mail via VTAM/SNI to our JES2.  (Actually it's still
>     connected that way.  And they've finished converting to JES2.
>     Hummmm, things need cleaning up...)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 08:55:17 CDT
From:         Craig White <CWHITE@UA1VM.BITNET>
Subject:      Misc MVS questions

I was asked several questions I needed some help answering.  Can anyone
help me with these?


Thanks in advance,

-craig

 1)Does the MVPSQL server-code shipped with 2.2 run on 2.1(MVS/ESA)? There is
  some indication in CSSF that it will, but the userid is not propagated
  correctly. Is this TCP or SQL related?

 2)Will MVS TCP 2.1 LPA mods support TCP 2.2.1? They look similar but
  larger?

 3)Cover letter says TCP 2.2 does not require OPER SPECIAL authority?
   What authority does it require?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 15:56:19 ITA
From:         Marco Pirovano <PIROVANO@SIAM.MI.CNR.IT>
Subject:      ARCHIE client for VM/CMS

Does someone know if there is a client implementation af ARCHIE server
for IBM VM/CMS enviroment ?
Thanks for your help.
Bye.
                                     Marco


----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Marco Pirovano
 CNR - IFCTR/SIAM                    E-Mail:  pirovano@siam.mi.cnr.it
 Via A. M. Amp!re, 56                Phone:   +39 2 7064.3272
 I-20131  MILANO - ITALY             Fax:     +39 2 266.30.30
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: JIMJ@JHUVM.BITNET (Jim Jones)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Re: tcp/ip IUCV link
Date: 14 Oct 92 20:18:22 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU


 In addition to static routes, you may find that you need someone to
 answer ARP requests for your hidden machine.  Depends on how you have
 your network setup, but here at JHU, I need both static routes and
 a proxy-arp entry.

 -jj
From: dmbarton@VNET.IBM.COM (Daniel M. Barton)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: MVS TCP/IP and Offload
Date: 7 Oct 92 17:58:37 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

> We have an older 3172 and TCP/IP V1.   We're planning to upgrade
> to V2 (unless a higher version is avail when we finally get the
> time :-(
>
> Anyway, one of our goals is to get an additional 3172 so we'll
> have a backup.   My question is:  If we get a 3172-3 and use
> offload technology, how hard will it be to switch back to NOT
> using offload in the event of a 3172 failure (go back to using
> the older 3172?)   Can we disable offload with a simple parm?

If you configure an Offload system in PROFILE TCPIP, TCPIP expects
the IP address(es) associated with the Offload host to be managed
by that system.  In other words, the TCPIP expects the 3172-3
running Offload to manage those IP address.

As a result, you would not be able to issue a simple obeyfile and
have TCPIP assign the IP address to another device, because TCPIP
expects that IP address to be managed by an Offload device.  You
would be able to assign the 3172-1 a different IP address on the
same network and use an obeyfile to start it and change the routing
tables, but if you want the 3172-1 to have the same address you will
have to stop TCPIP, change the PROFILE TCPIP, and restart TCPIP.

This is something that needs to be looked at as an enhancement to
Offload, but as the design stands today it cannot be done.

Daniel


=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====

Daniel M. Barton                 Internet:  dmbarton@vnet.ibm.com
TCP/IP Development
IBM Research Triangle Park, NC  USA
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 10:10:45 CET
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was K000160@ALIJKU11
From:         Wilfried Maschtera <Maschtera@EDVZ.UNI-LINZ.AC.AT>
Subject:      VMNFS V2.2

The console log of VMNFS contains among others the following messages:

Issuing this commnad:

    VMNFS R

RACF access control will be used to validate NFS mount requests.

If I try to mount my 191 Disk from SUN OS the console log shows
that the CP Link is used:

Return code 1298 from "EXECIO 0 CP (STRING LINK userid vaddr1 vaddr2 RR
PASS= xxxxx"  (there is a blank between '=' and the password).

VMNFS is in the same group as our FTP-Server. With this server I have no
problems.Also I think that the RACF definition for VMNFS are correct. If I
issue

SM VMNFS m cms alternat VMNFS userid

I can mount the disk without any problem.


What is wrong ? Is it really necessary that each user who want to use this
service has to permit the access ?

Regards / Wilfried
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.30]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 17:16:28 MET
From:         Eva Hocks <hocks@RZHP9A.GSI.DE>
Subject:      Returned mail: Host unknown (fwd)Re: TSO Notification for SMTP
              Inbound Mail

> SMTP is a Mesage Transfer Agent same as TSO/E XMIT with the purpose to
 transfer the one protocol they
> know of, same as there is an MTA for X.400 protocol. You definitly should use
 a Mailer such as
> UCLA/Mail on MVS or Crosswell on VM or whatever to support a User Agent and
 multiprotocol router.
> This mailer can do the notification of the user. In case you don't want to run
 a mailer we get back to
> the point where IBM is asked to support the notification . Do we MVS system
 programmers really want
> to customize several products like JES exit13 for NJE and SMTP for Internet to
 create the notification
> message to the user ? Wouldn't it be easier to have just one exit ? I would
 like to have SMTP send
> the info to exit13 where I did the coding already. Why have SMTP use SNA ? Why
 not change JES to also
> send a message for a local file .I suggest the TCP/IP IBMers should talk to
 the JES IBMers . Eva
From: MSC3@NERVM.NERDC.UFL.EDU (Maynard Calkin)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Re: Name Server Requirements
Date: 13 Oct 92 14:49:34 GMT
Organization: Northeast Regional Data Center
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

On Tue, 13 Oct 1992 10:32:39 EDT Fran Hensler said:
>I have heard that in order to run a name server in VM TCP/IP
>you must also have VM SQL installed.  Is this true?

No, it is not true.

Maynard
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Sun, 11 Oct 1992 19:18:03 MSK
From:         ABEL@ESOC1.BITNET

Hello anybody !
Tell me please, address of IBM Were i may get consult about
buying Ethernet adapter for IBM/9375  and ask a lot of questions about
their product.
                                                     Artyem M.Beljaev