From: slinke@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Steven Linke)
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.alien.visitors,talk.religion.newage
Subject: Re: Saga of the Family of Light I - Pleiadians13
Date: 22 Aug 92 07:25:19 GMT
Followup-To: sci.skeptic
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <64216@cup.portal.com> Don_-_Showen@cup.portal.com writes:
>
>To clear things up it is 12 strands of dna which equate to the 12 chakras
>of the human system.  I read our dna is 7.5 foot long (in a newspaper :-)
>).  Anyway the point is that there could possibly be 12 strands in the 7.5
>foot strand.  It makes a lot of sense when the chakras are considered.

However, it doesn't make much sense when you consider that human DNA
is actually composed of 46 strands of DNA, ranging in size from 1.7 cm
to 8.5 cm when uncoiled.  These so-called chakras must be bogus.

>It
>also makes a lot of sense that only the first two are active or intact and
>the rest are idle or scattered.  Which directly equates to why we only use
>a small percentage of our mind. And why we have a society stuck in
>survival.

Actually, all 46 strands are active in males and 45 of the strands
are active in females.  Which doesn't have the slightest effect on
what percentage of our minds we use.

I work at the same institution as the researcher who discovered the
two-stranded helical structure of DNA (Francis Crick).  He even got
the Nobel Prize for this work.  If you have evidence that your DNA
is TRIPLE-stranded as you claim, I'm sure he would be interested in
doing X-ray crystallography on it to verify this fact.

>As I see dna scientists start to roar this
>isn t what they told me is school.  I would like to suggest that even if
>the 12 heli are not distinguishable under a microscope that there may be an
>explanation for it that hasn t been discovered or noticed.  Like some of
>our dna may not be physical it could be in another energy sprectum we have
>not detected.

The physical structure of DNA is well-characterized.  If your "12
heli" aren't physical, then they aren't DNA.  Maybe they are HIINA's
(hottub-inducible imaginary nucleic acids).

>It sounds to me like you are saying that unless one of your high priests
>okays it you are not allowed to think of it.  You know I made an attempt to
>get some input on this very net.  Someone came on sounding like he knew
>something about dna but wound up saying breathing could kill and had the
>audacity to tell me not to do what I have been doing for the last 16 years.
>And actually tried to warn,  scare, people away from what I do.

I am the "high priest" who came on and warned people.  I didn't warn
them that breathing would kill them.  I warned them that purposely
causing yourself to hyperventilate will not "activate your DNA," but
rather inactivate your oxygen supply and may lead to death.  If
anybody stopped breathing a few months ago when I posted that
message, by all means resume normal breathing immediately.  Holding
your breath over several months will also inactive your oxygen
supply and will lead to death.
  
>I really
>hope,  someday, to find what I call fourth dimensional scientists to work
>with on detecting and documenting the occurrence.  After all if I could
>send my clients somewhere and they could get a readout of the status of
>their 12 heli it would make my work easier.

Please send me some of your DNA.  I would be happy to get the ball
rolling on the analysis of your triple-stranded DNA.  I must admit,
though, that all of the scientists here (including myself) live and
work in the three-dimensional world.  Therefore, we might not be
able to detect your HIINA.



-- 
Steve Linke
Salk Institute (Gene Expression Lab)
La Jolla, CA
Xref: sparky sci.skeptic:14355 alt.magick:3821 alt.pagan:7833