HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: phduong@cbda8.apgea.army.mil ("Peter H. Duong")
Subject: Khmer Rouge
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Date: 19 Nov 92 21:09:11 GMT


>From: edwind@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (THANH NGUYEN)

>
>After reading the enclosed article, my gut feeling is that Vietnam has
>every right to send troups back to Cambodia and wipe out the Khmer Rouge
>one for all.  It was justifiable for the U.S. to invade Granada and Panama
>to protect a handful of U.S. citizens living there.  It is even more
>justifiable for Vietnam to go back to Cambodia to protect more than a
>million Vietnamese civilians there.



From: myt@bali.amd.com (My Tran)

Unfortunately, I don't think Vietnam is in the position of the U.S.
U.S. is big, powerful, and a free country; while Vietnam is small,
poor, and is not free.

>But, before we go back to Cambodia, we
>must get the support of U.N. and neigboring countries in the region - just
>like the U.S. did in Panama and Iraq.

How?  Vietnam does not have credits to rally any nations.  They have
no money, no power, no respect for human rights.  Do I trust the
Vietnamese government since I am a Vietnamese? No, I don't think so.
But I don't think this is the issue, the issue is "Does Vietnamese
government care enough for the Vietnameses in Cambodia to protect
them?"; I don't think so either.


>Last time Vietnam could not get rid
>of them because the U.S., China, and Thailand provided them safe heaven and
>support.  But, now the international condition has changed dramatically and
>NO ONE wants to be associated with the murderous Khmer Rouge, therefore, I
>hope we can get the international support to wipe them out one for all.

You may forget that last time Vietnam got supports from the U.S.S.R.
Now they are on their own.  Yes, the international condition has
changed.

>
>Those are my opinions.  I welcome yours.  What do you think Vietnam should
>do to protect our people in Cambodia???

Make peace with Cambodia.  Really.  Just my 2 cents opinion.


Regards,


My






I agreed with the statement above of the U.S. has more influence than Vietnam
but the United States has more reason to invade Panama and Iraq than Vietnam.
The influence of the U.S. as superpower is one of the reason but other
reason(s) should be included.

In Panama, the first reason was the U.S. owns and operates the Panama Canal
which the U.S. could use as a reason to protect its citizen and its Canal and
the other reason was Mr. Noriega violated the drug traffic law.

In Iraq, the United Nations granted the use of forces and also the U.S. only
tried to rescue Kuwait.

These situations are very much different between Vietnam and Cambodia.
Vietnam invaded Cambodia was a mistake, the Khmer Rouge only killed their
own people.  Vietnam might use the reason of protecting the Vietnamese in
Cambodia but the Khmer Rouge didn't kill Vietnamese prior to Vietnam's
invasion.

I think the Khmer Rouge tries to play Politics and labels themselves as
Nationalists by killing Vietnamese.  It is a shame that they uses this
tactic to get more follower and sympathy from Cambodian.


Peter.
(My opinion is only mine.  No offence to anyone.)
From: khanh@cae.prds.cdx.mot.com (Khanh Bui)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Subject: HELP Va(n nghe^.
Date: 17 Nov 92 13:42:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.1992Nov17.134245.5748
Reply-To: khanh@cae.prds.cdx.mot.com
Organization: SCV Relay
Originator: daemon@media-lab.media.mit.edu


I posted twice, waited and waited, and never saw my message appeared
on the net.  So please forgive and forget if you see this piece of
mail again and again.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Ca'c ba.n netters na`o co' bie^'t ba?n nha.c "Hi`nh a?nh Ngu+o+`i
Em Kho^ng -Do+.i" (Nga`y na`o em dde^'n no'n em ca^`m tay,...)
o+? trong cuo^'n ba(ng hay CD na`o hoa(.c co' lo+`i cu?a ba`i
nha.c, la`m o+n post le^n du`m nha.

To^i muo^'n da.y cho ca'c em vu~ khu'c no'n la' dde^? tri`nh die^~n
va`o di.p Te^'t sa('p dde^'n, ma` kho^ng ti`m dda^u ra ddu+o+.c 
8 ca'i no'n.  Ca'c ba.n co' bie^'t o+? dda^u ba'n kho^ng ?  Va` 
chu+`ng bao nhie^u tie^`n mo^.t ca'i ?  To^i co' ho?i ma^'y tie^.m 
VN o+? Boston ma` kho^ng ai co' ba'n he^'t.  Buo^`n ghe^ ddi!

Tha`nh tha^.t ca'm o+n ca'c ba.n.

Kim-Kha'nh
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
From: bui@berlioz.nsc.com (Cuong Bui)
Subject: [NHA.C]
Originator: daemon@media-lab.media.mit.edu
Reply-To: bui@berlioz.nsc.com
Organization: SCV Relay
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:15:00 GMT

\V

  Em DDe^'n Tha(m Anh Mo^.t Chie^`u DDo^ng
                     To^ Vu~

Em dde^'n tha(m anh mo^.t chie^`u ddo^ng
Em dde^'n tha(m anh mo^.t chie^`u mu+a
Mu+a da^`m de^` , ddu+o+`ng tro+n u+o+'t tie^u ddie^`u
Em dde^'n tha(m anh ngu+o+`i em ga'i
Ta` a'o hu+o+ng no^`ng
Ma('t huye^`n tri`u me^'n su+o+?i a^'m lo`ng anh
Em dde^'n tha(m anh chie^`u ddo^ng gia'
Em dde^'n tha(m anh tro+`i mu+a gio'
DDu+o+`ng xa la.nh lu`ng

Ma(.t nhi`n ma(.t, ca^`m tay ba^ng khua^ng kho^ng no'i mo^.t ca^u
Lo+`i nghe.n nga`o, ho^`n anh nhu+ say nhu+ nga^y - vi` dda^u ?
Gio' ddu+a ca'nh chim tro+`i
DDo' dda^y ca'ch xa vo+`i
Chie^`u vui mu+a u+o+'t ca'nh
Kha' thu+o+ng kie^'p be^`nh bo^`ng
Da^~u kha('ng khi't ddo^i lo`ng
Chie^`u na`o em xa anh !
Co' hay lu'c em ve^`
Go't cha^n bu+o+'c reo a^m tha^`m 
Tre^n ddu+o+`ng mo^.t mi`nh ngoa`i mu+a - mu+a nhu+ mu+a trong lo`ng anh
Lo`ng bo^`i ho^`i nhi`n theo cha^n em - chi`m trong nga`n xanh 
Ta u+o+'c mo+ mo^.t chie^`u the^u na('ng
Em dde^'n cho+i que^n nie^`m cay dda('ng
   ...  va` que^n ... ddu+o+`ng ve^` .


\L
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
From: cs252dg@lamar.ColoState.EDU (so lame)
Subject: Re: [tho+] Kho^ng..
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 10:22:37 GMT
Organization: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO  80523

In article <1992Nov12.143712.19380@menudo.uh.edu> adus15@menudo.uh.edu (Amy Knock) writes:
> 	    ...kho^ng...
>
>kho^ng co' mu+a ma` ma('t ru+ng ru+ng u+o+'t
>kho^ng tro+`i mu` ho^`n va^~n phu? ki'n ma^y
>kho^ng co' gio' sao lo`ng la.i lung lay
>kho^ng gian la('ng ddo.ng, tho+`i gian que^n bu+o+'c
>
>kho^ng so^ng bie^?n nhu+ng ta nghe tie^'ng so'ng
>kho^ng u+u tu+ ma` ma('t bie^'c u hoa`i
>kho^ng co^ ddo+n sao bo^~ng tha^'y la.c loa`i
>kho^ng mong ddo+.i nhu+ng ma~i hoa`i tro^ng ngo'ng
>
>kho^ng gia^.n ho+`n ma` cu+' ngo^`i ca^m la(.ng 
>kho^ng gia~ tu+` ngu+o+`i cu~ng no+~ quay lu+ng
>kho^ng tha^n quen ne^n ngu+o+`i co^' du+?ng du+ng
>kho^ng lu+u luye^'n sao do+`i cha^n cha(?ng dda(.ng
>
>kho^ng suy nghi~ sao dde^m da`i tra(`n tro.c
>kho^ng ba^.n ta^m sao than va('n tho+? da`i
>kho^ng tu+o+ng tu+ sao suy nhu+o+.c hi`nh ha`i
>kho^ng tie^'c nuo^'i sao cu+' hoa`i tu+o+?ng vo.ng   
> 
>kho^ng! dda~ quye^'t.. nhu+ng.. lo`ng mi`nh va^~n cu+' 
>kho^ng the^? na`o que^n ddu+o+.c bo'ng hi`nh ai
>kho^ng co' chi cu~ng u+o+m mo^.ng tha^.t dda^`y
>kho^ng .. kho^ng le~ mi`nh.. thu+o+ng ai sao chu+' ???     
>
it has to be me "hon" ... maybe I am the one ... the one u have
been missing all these times .... so .. why don't we start with 
dinner ... we agreed on french ...n'est-ce pas ??? :-))))

					the one and only 
					ur nuv 
		
....> 
>
>
>
>-- 
>        )                )               )                )  /\ /\ /\ 
>       /_  __   __   _  /_              /_  __   __   _  /_  \/ \/ \/ 
>      / <_/) )_(__)_(__/ <   <> <> <>  / <_/) )_(__)_(__/ <  <> <> <>
From: CNguyen.osbu_north@xerox.com
Subject: Re: [POL] Go back to Cambodia...
Originator: daemon@media-lab.media.mit.edu
Reply-To: Cuong_M._Nguyen.OSBU_North@xerox.com
Organization: SCV Relay
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 03:01:50 GMT


From:	edwind@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (THANH NGUYEN)
>Hi all!
>
>After reading the enclosed article, my gut feeling is that Vietnam has
>every right to send troups back to Cambodia and wipe out the Khmer Rouge
>one for all.  It was justifiable for the U.S. to invade Granada and Panama
>to protect a handful of U.S. citizens living there.  It is even more
>justifiable for Vietnam to go back to Cambodia to protect more than a
>million Vietnamese civilians there.  But, before we go back to Cambodia, we
>must get the support of U.N. and neigboring countries in the region - just
>like the U.S. did in Panama and Iraq.  Last time Vietnam could not get rid
>of them because the U.S., China, and Thailand provided them safe heaven and
>support.  But, now the international condition has changed dramatically and
>NO ONE wants to be associated with the murderous Khmer Rouge, therefore, I
>hope we can get the international support to wipe them out one for all.
>
>Those are my opinions.  I welcome yours.  What do you think Vietnam should
>do to protect our people in Cambodia???

Basically, governments always wanted to protect their people, but these days,
the current Vietnamese leaders are not interest in protecting Vietnamese in
Cambodia because it'll involve too much risks for the stable of their positions
nationally and internationally.

I sensed that there will be more Viet killings in Cambodia (the UN recently
told the Khmer rouges that the national election will still be held next June
regardless of their presence or not), not only by the Khmer rouges but by any
party who could use it as a level to boost their bargaining chips at the table.
The Vietnamese in Cambodia had been massacred many times before. Fortunately
they had been saved in the past. This time who will come to the rescue?

/cuong
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
From: ptran@joule.elee.calpoly.edu (Phu Tran)
Subject: Re: -Do^' Vui
Originator: daemon@media-lab.media.mit.edu
Reply-To: ptran@gauss.elee.calpoly.edu
Organization: SCV Relay
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:02:33 GMT

In article <truongvu.721618999@cwis> you write:
>ptran@joule.elee.calpoly.edu (Phu Tran) writes:
>
>>Cha\o Ca'c Ba.n,
>
>>Co' mo^.t o^ng mu+o+'n nha\ kho^ng co' tie^\n nhu+ng o^ng co' va\ng.
>>O^ng co' ca^y va\ng da\i 31 inches, sau khi thu+o+ng lu+o+.ng vo+'i
>>o^ng chu? nha\.  Mo^~i mo^.t nga\y o+? -do' pha?i -du+a o^ng chu? nha\
>>1 inch va\ng.  Ne^'u o^ng o+? -do' ta^'t ca? la\ 31 nga\y thi\ o^ng pha?i?
>>ca('t ca^y va\ng 31 inches ra la\m ma^'y la^\n...???
>
>Tra? lo+`i la^~n vo^'n :
>Ne^'u khg^ so+. chu? nha` qui.t thi` ddu+a he^'t cho o^?ng --> kho?i
>ca('t .
>Ne^'u ca('t mo^~i nga`y thi` ca('t 30 la^`n
>
>Ne^'u khg^ pha?i thi` ..... sao????
>
>Truong Vu

Hi Truong,

-Du+a he^'t cho o^ng chu? nha\ la\ to^'t nha^'t -do'.  Vu+\a safe -du+o+.c
energy ma\ co\n safe -du+o+.c time nu+~a.  Tha^.t su+. ra chi? ca('t 4
la^\n tho^i va\ se~ -du+o+.c 5 mie^'ng nhu+ sau: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16.  Nhu+~ng
con so^' na\y co' the^? -de^'m tu+\ 1, 2, 3.......cho -de^'n....31.

Nga\y -da^\u thi\ -du+a o^ng chu? nha\ 1 inch
Nga\y thu+' hai -du+a o^ng chu? nha\ 2 inches va\ la^'y la.i 1 inch
Nga\y thu+' ba -du+a o^ng chu? nha\ 3 inches and so on....til 31 inches

HT

-- 

*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
*                  |                                  | * A warm smile is     *
* VINCENT H. TRAN  | ******************************** | the universal         *
*------- * --------| * ptran@joule.elee.calpoly.edu * | language of kindness. *
*Information       | * vt@triple-i.com              * |                       *
*International Inc.| * Phone:  (310) 390-8611       * | * Other things may    *
*5933 Slauson Ave. | * Fax:    (310) 390-7267       * | change us, but we     *
*Culver City,      | ******************************** | start and end with    *
*CA 90230-0620     |                                  | family.               *
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
From: dangt@JSP.UMontreal.CA (Dang Thanh Ngan)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Subject: Re: Song request
Keywords: You mean everything to me
Date: 23 Nov 92 06:02:44 GMT
Organization: Universite de Montreal

In article <1992Nov22.160855.7633@beaver.cs.washington.edu> tonydu@cs.washington.edu (Anh Ha`o) writes:
>   I am looking for the lyric of the song "You mean everthing to me".
>If any kind soul out there have it, could you please e-mail me a copy?
>Thanks
>Tony
>
        
         Here the song

                You Mean Everything To Me
 
        You are the answer to my lonely prayer
        You are an angel from above
        I was so lonely till you came to me
        With the wonder of your love
 
        I dont know how I ever lived before
        You are my life my destiny
        Oh my darling I love you so 
        You mean everything to me
 
        If you should ever ever go away
        There would be lonely tears to cry
        The sun above would never shined again
        There would be tear dropped in the sky
 
        So hold me close(now) and never let me go
        And say our love will always be
        Oh my darling I love you so
        You mean everything to me



Have fun

Bummy
From: hho@chaph.usc.edu ("** N.T.K.C.D. ***")
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Subject: [misc] Lavas Walkathon :-)
Date: 16 Nov 92 17:48:50 GMT
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]

--
*******************************************************************************
Hung P. Ho, Jr. (John)     USC DENTISTRY    PH.SYSTEMS          CCCOGP
                           hho@usc.edu      hung@phsys.com      hung@cccogp.com
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
From: "C'mon C'mon Baby" <light_my_fire@vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: testing ..... please ignore.....
Originator: daemon@media-lab.media.mit.edu
Reply-To: light_my_fire@vnet.ibm.com
Organization: SCV Relay
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 22:36:20 GMT

Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
From: nguyen@turing.scs.carleton.ca (H.H. Nguyen)
Subject: Re: [POL] final: Normalization w/ Vietnam
Organization:  Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 11:38:31 GMT

In article <Bxxn7I.67K@news.cso.uiuc.edu> nbt@napcc-hp.cvm.uiuc.edu (Nguyen Thanh Binh) writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.030119.20996@news.media.mit.edu>, groucho!thinh@uu.psi.com (Thinh N. Nguyen) writes:
>|> 
>|> Response again:
>|> 
>|> >         As far as the blessings of the Vietnamese community are concerned,
>|> > postings on this medium by Vietnamese supporting your views have been 
>|> > conspicuously scarce.  I have an idea:
>|> > 
>|> >       Let's hold a little referendum here.  People who would like to vote on
>|> > the matter should send private e-mail to me.  If you support normalization, 
>|> > write "SUPPORT NORMALIZATION" on your subject line, if you oppose it, then
>|> > write "OPPOSE NORMALIZATION" on the subject line.  Include any comments or
>|> > remarks you see fit.  I will count the votes in about a week.  Only one vote
>|> > per person, and please, Vietnamese only.  Duplicate votes, and votes by non-
>|> > Vietnamese will not be counted.  
>|> 
>|> >              My E-Mail address is:  becherer@cs.uiuc.edu
>|> 
>|> It seem like a fair idea. For my part, I stop response on the subject to
>|> allow an objective referendum. Let's see what the overseas Vietnamese
>|> really think.
>|> 
>|> sincerely yours,
>|> Thi.nh N. Nguye^~n
>
>
>	I think you are "ma^.p mo*` dda'nh la^.n con dden".  What do you
>mean by OPPOSE/SUPPORT NORMALIZATION.  what about the CONDITIONS imposed
>upon NORMALIZATION and how do we achieve and reinforce them ?
>
>	I do not know "what the overseas[sic] Vietnamese really think" but
>I know most UIUC students [la~o,a^'u] think that you are not clear and thus
>not trustworthy !.    
>
>-- 



	Having recently gone through a $150-Million Canada-wide referendum,
I observe that a referendum leaves voters with a binary choice only.
And this may or may not be what Max has in mind.

	There are several ways to remedy this drawback:

(1) Wording the question of the referendum carefully. E.g., "oppose/support
conditioned normalization." And somewhere, somebody has to define what
"conditioned" means. Or "oppose/support unconditioned normalization," and
ditto for "unconditioned." Un/conditioned on what ? And for that matter, 
does "normalization" imply aids as well ?

(2) Organizing a public poll, where more than a binary choice is allowed.
Here again the wordings, definitions have to be clear as well. 

	In any case, if the opinion probing is on, it should be
given with ample notice so that more people can participate. Is it
currently on or off ? If on, when are the starting and ending time ?

	Mind you, this exercise may or may not be a reflection of
the opinion of the Vietnamese living outside Vietnam. Somebody will
have to do more work if this extrapolation is to be made.

	Regards,
	H.H. Nguyen

Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
From: thinhd@crchh540.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Wild Thing)
Subject: Re: live, enjoy, and dying
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Lone Star State
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 00:35:59 GMT

Hello Tri',

I agree with you,  someone who claimed to have I.Q.
of 200 and a GPA of 4.00 would have a better way
of expressing him/herself.  May be he had a bad day
and in a real foul mood.  Hope he feels better now !


Thi.nh  (Wild Thing)  M.  Du*o*ng

In article <f5HI02Xt2bJC01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>, Tri Nguyen writes:
|> 
|>      Hello, (who ever you are, you didn't sign your name)
|> 
|>      First of all, let's get the title right.  It should be "Living, enjoying,
|> and dying", or "To live, to enjoy, and to die".  Now, I will attempt to answer
|> some of your points.  Ofcourse, this is only from my perspective, from the 
|> way I perceive the world around me.
|> 
|>      1.  It's not correct to say that everybody thinks they are great.  I for 
|> one never think of myself as greater than anyone.  Nevertheless, I never think
|> of myself as lesser than anyone.  You said you have an IQ of 200 and a GPA of
|> 4.0, and yet you accused everybody for thinking that they are great?  What is 
|> your logic here?
|> 
|>      2.  You said that "We succeed nowhere and our dreams always dies on us".
|> Well, what do you mean "We"?  Are you saying that the whole world population of
|> several billion people are not going anywhere at all?  Look around you and open
|> your eyes to the success of your friends, your colleagues, or your family 
|> members.  What about dreams?  Dreams never come true!  What is a dream?  Is it
|> not an escape from reality?  People often become confused between goals and 
|> dreams.  I set out my goals and I will strive toward achieving my goals.  While
|> if you think of your dreams and keep dreaming until they come true then,
|> my friend, let me tell you, dreams never come true.  So it's a matter of per-
|> ceiving your objectives.
|> 
|>      3.  You obviously have no respect for your origin, your parents.  (You 
|> indicated clearly in your posting).  Therefore, I can conclude that you have
|> no respect for yourself either.
|> 
|>      4.  You wrote at the end ".....Times running out on you".  No, time is not
|> running out on us.  Time is running out on YOU.
|> 
|> 
|>      Well, this is enough for now, until next time then.  And please spare us
|> the foul language.  At least, talk like a 4.0-with-200-IQ person for a change.
|> Maybe your life will start moving.  Good luck to you.
|> 
|> 
|> Tri' .
|>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Subject: <None>
From: cvadrbeb@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu
Date: 18 Nov 92 02:48:31 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Nntp-Posting-User: cvadssem

Um, who's it by?
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
From: tln@uni-paderborn.de (Lam Nguyen)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Subject: Re: Help file with .tar.Z
Date: 17 Nov 1992 12:28:53 GMT
Organization: Uni-GH Paderborn, Germany
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: ktpsp3.uni-paderborn.de


 Hi Ky,

In article <12885@sail.LABS.TEK.COM>, kyn@soul.tv.tek.com (Ky Nguyen) writes:
|> 
|> Hello Netters,
|> 
|> I did ftp some file from some place else. they have .tar.Z
|> I don't know how to convert back to run on PC.
|> Please help
|> thanks

 The .tar.Z files are in a UNIX-"tar" & "compressed" format (like "zip" or "lharc" format in DOS). All you have to do is : 

    1). uncompress <filename>.tar.Z 
       ==> it proceduces a <filename>.tar file.
    2). If you want to see the contents of this .tar file, just type:
        tar -tvf <filename>.tar | more 
    3). To extract the contents, type:
        tar -xvf <filename>.tar
 That's all :)

 TLN
-- 
    ____ |    __o       __o   | tatlam@uni-paderborn.de
 /\  /   |  _`\<,_    _`\<,_  | ...!uunet!mcsun!unido!pbinfo!tatlam 
/  \/__  | (_)/ (_)  (_)/ (_) | tln@ktp_serv.uni-paderborn.de
- Research is what I'm doing if I don't know what I'm doing -- A.Einstein
From: cyclops@pate.enet.dec.com (CYCLOPS 2000-3D 15-Nov-1992 0815)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Subject: Da^.p Ma^.t
Date: 15 Nov 92 13:16:12 GMT
Organization: Saigon.COM Public Access BBS, Sillicon Valley CA  (408)739-1520


 Co^ ga'i la(?ng lo+ dda~ bi. ma^'t trinh tie^'t tu+` thuo+?
 mu+o+`i ba, na(m nay co^ 18 tuo^?i ddi la^'y cho^`ng, co^ bie^'t
 ro~ ra(`ng ne^'u dde^m ta^n ho^n ddo^.ng pho`ng hoa chu'c ma`
 chu' re^? kha'm pha' ra co^ dda~ tha^'t tie^'t thi` mo.i chuye^.n
 se~ hu+ bo^.t hu+ ddu+o+`ng ca? .

 (Nga`y xu+a mu. Tu' Ba` da.y Vu+o+ng Thu'y Kie^`u ca'ch du`ng
  ha.t lu+.u, mau' mao` ga` v.v... -De^? lu+`a ga.t kha'ch la`ng
  cho+i la` ...em va^~n co`n... nguye^n si)

 Co^ be`n mua mo^.t go'i pha^?m ddo? ve^`, dde^m ta^n ho^n dda~
 dde^'n, co^ lie^`n gia^u' go'i pha^?m va`o trong "ca'i y'" va`
 gia? vo+` e le^., e the.n va` na`m nhu+ ca? ddo+`i chu+a tha^'y
 qua "ca'i ddo'" bao gio+` !

 Chu' re^? la` mo^.t cha`ng... hu? nho, tuy nhie^`u tuo^?i nhu+ng
 ra^'t tha^.t tha` kho+` kha.o, bu+o+'c vao` pho`ng ta^n ho^n, co^?i
 kha(n, co^?i mu~ .v.v...

 Na(m phu't sau ..... bo^~ng tu+` trong pho`ng vo.ng ra :

	- O^'i tha^`y o^i ! O^'i me. o^i !	Chu' re^? tru tre'o

	- Ca'i gi` the^' con ?		Tie^'ng bo^' me. cu?a chu' re^?
 
	- Cu+'u nha` con vo+'i ! Con nghe lo+`i na`m theo lo+`i tha^`y
	  me da.y .... Ro^`i bo^~ng nhie^n ....	   Chu' re^? va^~n la

	- Ro^`i bo^~ng na`m sao ? 	O^ng ba` gia` be^n ngoa`i so^'t 
				        ruo^.t 

	- Co^ a^'y bi. ..... da^.p ma^.t .... ro^`i !!!

 Trong khi ca? ho. nha` cho^`ng dang quy'nh qui'u, lo cha.y ti`m lang y,
 thi` co^ da^u mo+'i thu?ng thi?nh tho.c tay va`o "ca'i y'" cu?a mi`nh
 ru't ra soi du+o+'i dde`n ne^'n lo+` mo+` ... ro^`i la^?m ba^?m :

	- Che^'t cha ro^`i ! Mi`nh bo? lo^.n go'i pha^?m .... ma`u xanh !
From: hthai@farad.elee.calpoly.edu (Ho Thai)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese
Subject: Re: *** -Do^' vui -de^? ho.c  # 5 ***
Date: 18 Nov 92 22:31:18 GMT
Organization: Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo

In article <1992Nov16.122114.1@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu> cvadrasb@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu writes:
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Thuye^`n Vie^~n Xu*'-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>    
>
>               -- Co' 10 bao bi.  Mo^?i bao co' 10 vien bi
>               -- Trong 10 bao 
>                               - 9 bao na(.ng ba(`ng nhau ba(`ng 100 gam
>                                 (mo^.t vie^n bi na(.ng 10 gam trong 9 bao 
>                                  na`y)
>
>                               - co mo^.t bao na(.ng 90 gam
>                                 (trong bao na`y mo^~i vien bi na(.ng 9 gam)
>               
>
>
>
>              -Do^' ca'c ba.n la`m sao -de^? ca^n mo^.t la^`n -de^?
>               kie^'m ra bao na(.ng 90 gam
>
>               Nho*' nha chi? co' mo^.t la^`n ca^n tho^i -do'
>
D
Bo? le^n mo^~i be^n ca^n ba\n (|___|__^__|____|) tu+\ bao, to+'i khi mo^.t be^n
ca^n le^.t.  Ca'i ni go.i la\ ca^n tu+\ tu+\, chu+' kho^ng pha?i ca^n nhie^\u
la^\n.     ..... :-)
 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese