HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tk76008@cs.tut.fi (Kokkinen Timo)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: lilo boot problem with 0.98p5 SLS
Date: 13 Dec 92 16:27:00
Organization: Tampere University of Technology, Finland
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: pohjanrastas.cs.tut.fi
In-reply-to: jchen@acsu.buffalo.edu's message of 13 Dec 92 04:31:14 GMT

In article <Bz6KK3.Jps@acsu.buffalo.edu> jchen@acsu.buffalo.edu (Jonathan Chen) writes:

   Hi, all.

	   I installed SLS 0.98p5 (min+base+x) this morning.  And with some
   help from my friend, we put in the lilo ver 0.7.  I have one hard drive
   and I partition it to 20mb DOS, 63mb linux and the rest is also for linux.
   lilo boots fine with ms-dos 5.0.  But when it try to boot linux, it gives
   me the following errors and hang the machine:
	   ...
	   ...
	   partition table ok
	   MINIX-fs: unable to read superblock
	   EXT-fs: unable to read superblock
	   MSDOS bread failed
	   kernel panic: Unable to mount root

   That's it! It hangs there!

   My machine config is: 386-40 8mb ram and 116mb with trident 8900


   Thanks for any help,

I had a same problem. I replaced /Image file on root with a new one and
then linux boots fine. Maybe its something wrong in original Image
file.

   -Jonathan
   ====================
   jchen@cs.buffalo.edu



--
	Timo Kokkinen			puh: 931-186767
	N{yttelij{nkatu 19 N 64         tk76008@cs.tut.fi
	33720 Tampere
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: mumc@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Michael A. Causa)
Subject: Problem with SLS boot disk...
Keywords: SLS, boot 
Organization: Educational Computing Network
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 04:11:53 GMT

Hi,
	
	I've been trying to get the SLS distribution running on my
machine.  As far as I can tell everything gets installed to hda1 fine,
the problem that I am having is this:  The doinstall program creates the
boot disk and tells me to reboot.  When I boot with the disk it then
reports various things such as memory, etc.  Where I think the problem
is this - While its booting I get the message  

	WD8013 board not found at I/O=280

What is this WD8013 board?  The I/O=280 makes me think that it is trying
to do something with my Sound Blaster board.  If I'm not mistaken the
SB's base address is at 280.  

If this is what it is how can I get the boot disk ignore the SB, if not
the SB then what?  I appreciate any ideas...

My hardware configuration is as follows:

386 DX, 16M ram, 104M Hard Drive, Diamond Speedstar HiColor, 
	Sound Blaster.

e
						Thanks very much,
						Mike Causa
						mumc@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu.
From: Greg.Naber@f34.n343.z1.fidonet.org (Greg Naber)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Reposting Announcements
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 16:06:22 -0800

Hello there Joe!

In a Ditty of <Tuesday December 15 1992>, Joe Klemmer says to Greg
Nabor:

 JK>                 {hope I spelled your name right}

Close enough for me;)

 MW=>> Any suggestions or comments about these things? If we don't
 MW=>> crosspost everything between c.o.l.a and c.o.l, it would save

 JK>         Is this in the works?  Just checking.

It is/will be happening shortly, stay tuned...

c.o.l.a -> fidonet echoid of LNXMANAGE, already on the 'bone'. One way
gate.

 * Origin: -=[S'Qually Holler's BBS]=- 1-206-235-0270 USR DUAL 
(1:343/34)
From: tdunbar@vttcf.cc.vt.edu (Thomas Dunbar)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Epoch 4.2/viewer/ctl-arrow
Date: 14 Dec 92 14:43:52 GMT
Organization: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA


the solution, as Marlet already points out in the README for viewer!!, is to
make a simple patch to the epoch source:
  in buffer.h, next to last line, change the default for is_meta_char from
   > 240    to
   > 200
and recompile..dont use the ctl-arrow kludge.
 i will post a patched epoch-4.2 binary to tsx-11 (dir /pub/linux/packages/TeX)
shortly.
   thomas
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: poe@daimi.aau.dk (Peter Orbaek)
Subject: Re: lpr.tar.Z: Daemon no present !? but it's there!
Organization: DAIMI: Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, Denmark
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 11:22:02 GMT

wongi@netcom.com (Isaac Wong) writes:

>In article <1992Dec11.194257.18065@netcom.com> wongi@netcom.com (Isaac Wong) writes:
>>
>>I got mine from sunsite: ...../Daemons
>>
>>after lpr, i check the spool dir and it looks ok. ps to check for lpd and it's
>>there, but lpq says daemon not present! any clue?

Lpq will report "no deamon present" if there's no deamon serving the 
printer in question.

In overview the lpd system works like this:

	There's one main lpd daemon that should always run.

	When a job is received, lpd forks and the child handles the
	queue for that job until the queue is empty. It's such a 
	child that lpq misses.

>[it's me again]

>BTW, i have the 'of' field of the printcap removed and i was using a test printer
>in my printcap for testing, like:

>test:lp=/tmp/lp_test:sd=/usr/spool/test:lf=/dev/console:

That should work. You might want to have a af= entry too.

>Also, anyone's got a printcap for HP LaserJet IIIP ?

You might want to have a /usr/adm/lpd-errs file that is world-writable,
that is the default destination for log messages from lpd.

	 - Peter.
-- 
Peter Orbaek <poe@daimi.aau.dk>
Hasle Ringvej 122, DK-8200 Aarhus N, DENMARK
From: Nolan.Lee@f5.n390.z1.fidonet.org (Nolan Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: DC2120 tape drives?
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 23:38:42 -0800

Tuesday December 08 1992 18:35, Clark Williams wrote to All:

 CW> Does anyone have any experience with the Summit or Colorado tape
 CW> drives (DC2120 cartridge) that are run from the floppy disk
 CW> controller? Performance, reliability, etc. I'm considering
purchasing
 CW> one but I'm not sure that it will work with my Adaptec 1542b SCSI
 CW> controller.

     I've been running two of the Colorado 250's for over a year.
     I'm running one from their FC-10 controller, and one off of
     a floppy controller. I have nothing but praise for them. :-)

 CW> I realize that I'd probably have to write a driver for linux since
I
 CW> haven't seen anything on the mailing list or the newsgroup about
these
 CW> drives.

     Let us know if you DO decide to buy one and write a driver.
     I'd like to see one.  :-)


thanks,
Nolan

 * Origin: WSTPC*38K+Files*100+Echos*504-886-2157*16.8K HST/V32bis 
(1:390/5)

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: wyvern@gnu.ai.mit.edu (The Wyvern)
Subject: Re: [Q] Bug in select(2)?
Keywords: select
Organization: Free Software Foundation
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 08:25:53 GMT

In article <10DEC199211081583@addvax.llnl.gov> brand@addvax.llnl.gov (Hal R. Brand, LLnL, 510-422-6312) writes:
>I just tried to get the Diku client TINTIN running under Linux. With just a
>little futzing, it compiled and fired up printing its banner and prompt.
>However, upon typing the first character, TINTIN aborted due to an error in
>read(2) on fd 0; the error was errno=4, Interrupted system call. After some
>playing, I was able to isolate what I think is the problem: select(2) returns
>that fd 0 has input ready immediately following the typing of the first
>character, but read(2) on fd 0 blocks until the whole line is available (i.e.
>until you hit the <return> key). When TINTIN's timer (via alarm(3)) goes off,
>the (blocking) read(2) returns with and error and errno set to 4. The program
>below demonstrates the problem. Under Ultrix and SunOS, I never get any "I"s
>printed ("I"s indicate that "read(0,...)" was blocking when the SIGALRM was
>delivered). But, under Linux, I get the "I"s after every SIGALRM (indicated
>by a "T" being printed) following typing the first character of input.
>
>Is there something special about the Linux select(2), or read(2), or
>possibly the mode BASH leaves the terminal driver in that I don't know about,
>or have I misinterpreted the data, or is it a bug?
>
>Hardware Config:
>	486-50 (OPTI) with 8 Mybte
>	Maxtor 130 Mbyte
>	  Part. 1 is 64 Mybte DOS
>	  Part. 2 is  8 Mbyte Linux swap
>	  Part. 3 is 64 Mbyte Linux/Minix fs
>	NO ethernet board
>Software Config:
>	Latest SLS (a,b,c,x)
>	  
>					Hal R. Brand
>					LLNL
>					brand@addvax.llnl.gov

I've also been noticing some strange behavior which seems to be also due to
select(2), although it doesn't seem to be of the same type as mentioned
above. I'm running a client/server program that uses sockets of type AF_INET.
Up until 0.99 I wasn't having problems but now clients and servers are getting
stuck. They just hang. ps -l shows the WCHAN for the hung processes as
tcp_read
when normally it shows do_select when they're working correctly. The programs
work for an indefinite period of time before locking up completely, at which point
I have to kill the processes and restart them.
System configuration:
	486-33 8mb RAM
	200 mb IDE hd
	Linux v0.99 with TCP/IP
	also no ethernet board



Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: wongi@netcom.com (Isaac Wong)
Subject: Re: LPD: no daemon present SOLVED!
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 07:20:22 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.043149.28796@afterlife.ncsc.mil> pjangli@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Philip Anglin) writes:
>Well, it's solved for me anyway.  The problem I had is
>that the printcap I got had of=/usr/lib/lpf, but that

I have it solved too, sort of. after seeing a number successes of people using
the canned printcap file (minus the 'of' field). I decided to go down to
Fry's and spent $1.99 for a parallel printer cable for my LaserJet IIIP (it
has both paralle and serial interfaces) and use the original printcap entry 
for lp as well. and... it works! So, there must be some problem with my
printcap entry for using my Laserjet in serial mode. Coould anyone
tell me if there's anything wrong with this please ?

lp:br#9600:lp=/dev/ttys0:sd=/usr/spool/lp1: lf=/usr/adm/lpd-errs


thanks.
From: ron@argus.lpl.Arizona.EDU (Ron Watkins)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: SLIP
Keywords: Serial Line IP
Date: 19 Dec 92 00:27:16 GMT
Organization: Lunar and Planetary Lab, U of AZ

Along the same lines, can I use SLIP to mount remote file systems from
a Sun at work??? If so, how is it done. Is there some documentation or books
which describe SLIP and how to use it?
				Ron
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: pmacdona@sanjuan (Peter MacDonald)
Subject: Re: LINUX, Unix, and opportunity for change
Organization: University of Victoria, Victoria B.C. CANADA
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 92 17:33:16 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.154505.8927@bcars6a8.bnr.ca> mleech@bnr.ca (Marcus Leech) writes:
>Unix provides an extremely rich programming environment, but it has
...
>Parameterization of system modules, including the kernel and critical

There are two schools of thought on this.  
Please allow me to...
And please don't make me ...

The VMS tunable kernel is necessary because Digital is not giving out
source.  Linux comes with source so you are free to tune the source
to your hearts content.  If want to avoid recompiles, you can use 
lilo to pass in parameters.  For run time tuning, you can hook into
the ioctl calls, to modify kernel parameters.  

Having the source is far superiour because it is less indirect, and
indirection always exacts a price,  in terms of simplicity, flexibility
and power.

>There needs to be a consistent and flexible accounting mechanism. Such a

Ditto what someone else said (mkj?).  This is overhead few will want.
If it isn't to extensive, we might consider adding it to the kernel
as a conditional compile.

>More of the system should use the syslog() mechanisms, and there should be

Syslog (which I have started to add to SLS) is not in the kernel.  It
is supported or not, by the system utilities login, etc.  Note, things
like xlock, and xdm and ftpd need source modifications, to participate.

>I'd like to make it clear that I'm as rabid a Unix fanatic as the next guy,

Glad to hear it.  But there are probably more differences than similarities
between VMS and Linux (I work supporting products on a 6*6000 VAX cluster).
Some of these differences are more than just philosophy.  VMS is single
sourced, and tightly controlled.  Linux is great :-).

Peter
pmacdona@sanjuan.uvic.ca
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Lars Wirzenius)
Subject: Re: Is ``lint'' available for Linux?
Organization: University of Helsinki
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:02:32 GMT

joel@wam.umd.edu (Joel M. Hoffman) writes:
>I didn't find lint on tsx-11, nor on prep.ai.mit.edu.  Where might I
>find it?

I don't know of a freely available lint.  Personally, I use gcc with
almost all warning turned on (more or less -Wall and a few others),
which works almost as well.  Just about the only thing it can't do is
check things across files, but that is not much of a trouble for me,
because I prefer to use prototypes rigorously.

--
Lars.Wirzenius@helsinki.fi  (finger wirzeniu@klaava.helsinki.fi)
   MS-DOS, you can't live with it, you can live without it.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: wirzeniu@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Lars Wirzenius)
Subject: Re: linux=BIG PLUS  comp.os.linux=???  (==> you VOTE)
Organization: University of Helsinki
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 19:28:27 GMT

colbert@astro.umd.edu (Edward J.M. Colbert) writes:
>I'm taking a simple vote: would like it split/don't need it split.
>Then, I'm just going to post the results of the vote.

Er, isn't this a tad unnecessary, since the Matt Welsh (one of the
moderators, I'm the other one) already said the crosspostings would
stop when things are set up correctly, e.g. a mailing list which
mirrors the group is set up for those unable to read the group
directly.

(Not to mention the fact that the announcements are _hardly_ a problem
volumewise, since there are only two or three per day.)

--
Lars.Wirzenius@helsinki.fi  (finger wirzeniu@klaava.helsinki.fi)
   MS-DOS, you can't live with it, you can live without it.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: mdw@db.TC.Cornell.EDU (Matt Welsh)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Sound for Linux 0.99 (Sound driver v 0.4)
Keywords: SOUND
Organization: The Linux Inquisition, Propaganda Division
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:06:44 GMT

In article <9235020.16960@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus James HENDERSON) writes:
>arumble@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Anthony Rumble) writes:
>>kenc@sol.acs.unt.edu (Ken Corey - Operator) writes:
>>>(Also, there's a sneaky little voice in the back of my head 
>>>thinking..."Wow..rogue would be *cool* with a few sound effects...")
>>
>>Very easy to do.. Just make the source code fork() and 
>>cat the sample to /dev/dsp..
>
>What about just
>	system("cat sample > /dev/dsp &");

That's pretty hefty overhead for playing a sound effect within a
program. If you want it to be faster, open /dev/dsp by hand and send
the sample directly to it with a series of writes. This way you don't
create a whole new process (or, in this case, two processes) for
playing the sound effect.

mdw
-- 
Matt Welsh     mdw@tc.cornell.edu     Cornell Theory Center
  "Go on, emote! I was raised on thought balloons!"
From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Question about HP ethernet cards
Date: 14 Dec 1992 17:01:12 GMT
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu


I saw somewhere in a list of supported hardware that Linux supposedly
works with some variety of HP ethernet cards.

This is intriguing.  I have a HP "ThinLAN" card (model 27250A) in a HP
Vectra which I would like to use.  Unfortunately, I can't find any code
to talk to it.

Does anyone know where the missing ethernet drivers are?

-- 
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jliddle@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu (Jean Liddle)
Subject: Re: How stable is extended filesystem?
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:33:30 GMT
Organization: Illinois State University
Keywords: extfs

In article <1gm5rrINNb01@life.ai.mit.edu> mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) writes:
>
>I've only been using Linux for two days.  I've installed it on a 300MB
>"extended" partition.  Half of one of those days was spent reinstalling
>after it barfed on my disk.
>
>If you don't *need* extfs, and don't mind short file names, I would
>recommend not using it for now.
>

I have been using the extfs exclusively since mid-summer, with no 
difficulties whatsoever.  Maybe I'm just lucky, but it works for me ...

Jean.
-- 
Jean Liddle                                 
Computer Science, Illinois State University  
e-mail:  jliddle@ilstu.edu                  
--------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: oususajg@Msu.oscs.montana.edu
Subject: Xwindows
Reply-To: oususajg@Msu.oscs.montana.edu
Organization: Montana State University
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:58:46 GMT

I am a new user and I am having a slight problem with my video type.

I am runing a 486/33, 8meg ram, 200 meg hd, Orchid Pro Designer 2 graphics card
and NEC 3d monitor.  I am also running the linux .98.  I have sucessfuly goten
it installed and Xwindows is runing at 800x600 but I would like to get
1024x768.  Isa there anybody out there with this video setup? If so could you
post or mail me some info.

thanks in advance.....................Joe Garber

(oususajg@trex.oscs.montana.edu)
From: rbraun@spdcc.com (Rich Braun)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: LINUX, Unix, and opportunity for change
Date: 20 Dec 92 18:56:39 GMT
Organization: Jupiter Technology Inc., Waltham MA

goer@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>Did you actually sign a contract that gives them rights to code you cut
>at home during off hours?  If so, I'm quite amazed.  Perhaps I'm just
>naive, but this sounds like a form of slavery.  I hope they pay you a
>king's ransom.

Alas, this kind of contractual obligation has become increasingly
common.  My most recent job change involved the mandatory signing of a
similar agreement: no signature, no job.  Kinda like having to pee in
a bottle (which I *didn't* have to do).  The R&D business sure has
gotten screwed up this decade!

Usually, these agreements only restrict personal R&D which is related to
the activities of one's employer.  I could, for example, contribute some
basic O/S or utility software to Linux; but I could probably not hack
around with TCP/IP or other communications software without infringing
on the agreement.  If you work for a big conglomerate with its fingers
in every area of technology, though, such an agreement can be *really*
restrictive!

-rich
From: root@slave.uwe.ac.uk (Operator (Phil/Dylan))
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: [Q] TCP/IP telnet (client) funny??
Date: 15 Dec 92 07:57:49 GMT
Reply-To: p_copela@csd.uwe.ac.uk
Organization: The New University in the West of England, Bristol (WEB)

In article <1992Dec11.115248.20415@aston.ac.uk>, evansmp@uhura.aston.ac.uk (Mark
Evans) writes:

|> So the problem would appear to be something to do with either the loopback
|> or the options set on the socket used by the server.
|> Does the Diku server run standalone or is it brought up by inetd?

hum,.. well currently i'm on linux 0.99up1 (unofficial patchlevel 1 
(just inodes increased)) and using gcc 2.3.2, but i'm starting diku
with 'nohup ./dmserver &' as root (not tried ordinary user) and having
*excepitional* uptime from it,.. previously under 0.96pl6 the mud
would die and kill the swapper but not now. I dunno about getting inetd
to bring up diku as to my train of thought it would start up a new mud
everytime someone would call port 4000, definitely *NOT* what you want

on a different note, and probably mor suited to rec.games.lpmud, I heard
that lpmud had been ported, but after compiling the driver, I find that
there is no game data included, so having downloaded the lars and discworld,
I find that it cannot use 'master.c' for the lpc code,... now this is only a
stab in the dark, but does lpmud have to have more than 15 chars in a 
filename? ie am I going to have to generate an extfs partition to
accomodate it?

Phil
=--=
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: romano@pimac2.iet.unipi.it (Romano Giannetti)
Subject: SLS wish list...
Organization: Dipartimento di Informatica, Universita' di Pisa
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:27:18 GMT

Hi, all linuxers.

  It seem to me I'm not the first one asking this, but I'm not so sure...
It would be a great thing if the lx??.taz package, in the SLS distibtion,
had in it the kernel source *used* to build the kernel in the same 
Image.taz package. I mean, once you have installed it (and lxpatches.taz),
you can go to /linux, make dep clean all and obtain the same kernel you
have. So it would very simple to make the little modifications often used.

More simple, put in image.taz a file with the chosing done to build the kernel.
This could suffice for me... 

I was nor be able to mount an efs file system (I have SLS 0.98pl5 dist 
upgraded to 0.99 kernel, with the "unofficial" patch from linus), my
mount say something like "Unknown error 26240". (I think I have made
all quite right, changed the parttion type to 83, rebooted, mkefs the
partition, but then... no mount! Does I have to change the mount command? )
I think efs is compiled released by the SLS 0.99 kernel (or not?).

And another little question: when I do "make dep" I have some error from
#error line. I think they are there to say things like "...you cannot 
choose no keyboard at all..." and similar. So, is it normal have this 
line parsed during "make dep"? Perhaps "make dep" stress all the branch
of #ifdef... and I have not to worry, only comment out and go, or what?

I have installed Linux from SLS on a laptop and it's working perfectly
for me, anyway, I have all I need - X, TeX, xfig, gnuplot - and at an
acceptable performance, thinking my machine is only a 386/25 w/o 387,
4Mram, B/W VGA only. Thank you Linux wizard for the great Xmas gift!

Bye,
     Romano.

PS Does anyone need a xfig patched against the XDrawArc well-known bug
   in X386mono? 

-- 
***************************************************************************
* Romano Giannetti          * Dip.to di Ingegneria dell'Informazione      *
*                           * Elettronica, Informatica e Telecomunicazioni*
* romano@iet.unipi.it       * via Diotisalvi,2                            *
* giannetti@sssup1.sssup.it * Universita' di Pisa, I-56126 PISA, Italy    *
***************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: drew@ladymacb.cs.colorado.edu (Drew Eckhardt)
Subject: Re: LINUX AND OS/2
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 00:17:35 GMT

In article <9702.867.uupcb@freddy.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca> jerome.yuzyk@freddy.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Jerome Yuzyk)  writes:
>
>I currently run OS/2 2.0 and have been waiting for the opportunity to add
>Linux to my system, and perhaps change my base operating system.  I will be 
>getting two new 500M SCSI drives over Xmas (Santa = me) and will be
>re-installing OS/2 with Boot Manager and a bunch of partitions (to be named
>later).  BUT, I also want to make room/allowance to install Linux when it has
>some DOS support (well, I gotta make a living with what I know already, eh...)
>My questions are:
>
>- Should all my operating systems (OS/2,native DOS, Linux) be on one of the
>  drives, or should I put Linux on drive 2 (or can I)?

Several things : 

1.  You can only boot from the first physical hard disk, so you might want 
	to have atleast / for Linux on that disk.

2.  Splitting Linux between several drives (ie swap on one, /usr on 
	another) will maximize performance since Linux will talk to
	multiple SCSI drives at the same time.  


>
>- can I just leave one biggish partition unformatted and drop Linux in when
>  I'm ready?

Yes.

>- do I need (to wait for) special drivers for my SCSI card (BusLogic) which
>  already have SCO drivers?  Driver-hacking is way beyond me, but this card
>  is pretty hot, so maybe someone would be willing out there.

If you're talking about one of the  Buslogic Adaptec compatable boards,
you won't have any problems.
-- 
Boycott AT&T for their absurd anti-BSDI lawsuit. | Drew Eckhardt
Condemn Colorado for Amendment Two.		 | drew@cs.colorado.edu
Use Linux, the fast, flexible, and free 386 unix |  
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux