HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: fnord@panix.com (Cliff Heller)
Subject: Re: Help with 'find' and escape sequences
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 14:54:40 GMT
Organization: Right Bleedin' Church of Libertine Obfuscatology

In <brien.703146035@irk> brien@irk.ugcs.caltech.edu (Brien Brian Oberstein) writes:

>Brian Fitzgerald writes:

>The reason I didn't use the -type f approachis because I'm looking 
>for something more general.  I still had a problem with your solution
>(not because of the . you accidentally left out).  I got the message
>"rm: /*~ non-existent".  Apparently find didn't replace the {}.  I tested
>this with echo commands and it turns out that find only replaces {} when
>separated by spaces on each side.  When I did separate it, however, the
>command turned into "rm -i directory /*~", which is no good.

>still looking for a solution.

I don't really know what you mean by "more general"
You are right about the expansion of {}.  That is its documented behvior.
I don't know why.

How about:

find . -type d -exec "echo *~" \; | xargs rm -i

There could be some syntactic error in the exec, but I think you get the
idea.


-- 
     / \      Reverend fnord   	             | "King Kong died for your sins!"
    /   \     fnord@panix.com                | 
   / <0> \                                   | "Don't just eat a hamburger, 
  /_______\   Church of Obfuscatology, Inc.  |  eat the HELL out of it!"
From: zook@sweetpea.jsc.nasa.gov (Craig A Zook 283-4206)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: formatting/aligning text (awk? printf? huh?)
Date: 7 Apr 1992 23:16:54 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: nasa-jsc

In article <odsT9Se00awV4XpYNT@andrew.cmu.edu>, vs0r+@andrew.cmu.edu (Victor Dmitri Schoeman) writes:
|> jtice@butterfly.UVic.CA (Jason W. Tice) writes:
|> > 
|> > I've a list of  names and phrases, that look like this:
|> > 
|> > john@here.i.am: this a test
|> > Bob_M@there.I.go:               this a test
|> > ME@HERE.UUCP:  this is not a test
|> > jtice@nero.uvic.ca:    this might be a test
|> > noone@uvicctr.uic.ca:                         this a test
|> > you_too:     this a test of nuclear fission inside a tin can
|> > 
|> > I want it to look like this:
|> > 
|> > john@here.i.am:              this a test
|> > Bob_M@there.I.go:            this a test
|> > ME@HERE.UUCP:                this is not a test
|> > jtice@nero.uvic.ca:          this might be a test
|> > noone@uvicctr.uic.ca:        this a test
|> > you_too:                     this a test of nuclear fission inside a tin can 
|> > 
|> > You get the idea (I hope)
|> 
|> try:
|> 
|> awk '{printf $1} {for (i=length($1);i<=28;i++) printf " "} {for (i=2;i<=NF;i++) printf $i" "} {printf "\n"}' file
|> 
Depending how the initial input file looks you might try.

awk '{ printf("\n%-28s ",$1) }'

or

awk -F: '{ printf("%-28s  %s\n",$1,$2) }' input_file
This assumes the delimiter is :

-- 
Craig Zook   -   zook@sweetpea.jsc.nasa.gov
Systems Engineeering and Administration
McDonnell Douglas Space Systems Corp. - Engineering Services Division
(713) 283-4206
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: John Anthony Walsh <jawalsh@copper.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Hiding from the w command
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 12:18:19 -0500


Is there a way to hide what one is doing from someone else using the w
command to check up on people?  Thanks for all replies.


John 

-- 
**********John A. Walsh, Dept. of English, Indiana University************
*               jawalsh@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (Internet)               *
*         jawalsh@iubacs.bitnet (Bitnet)  812/323-1035 (Voice)          *   
*        1216 S. Stull Ave. #2, Bloomington, IN 47401 (US Mail)         * 
*******************"I drift myself in lacy jags."-ww*********************
Xref: sparky comp.unix.questions:6180 comp.sys.sun.hardware:1675 comp.sys.sun.misc:1913 comp.sys.misc:426
From: PS9ZRHMC@MIAMIU.BITNET (Peter Sweeney)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: UNIX equiv. of CLS for ATT605?
Date: 7 Apr 92 00:44:48 GMT
Organization: Miami University - Academic Computer Service

Is there a UNIX equivalent for the DOS CLS command?
I'm using an AT&T 605 terminal.  When I log off, it
sends a clearscreen signal.  What is it doing?
 
And can I accomplish the same thing with a vt100
emulator via modem at home?
 
Any response is welcome.
 
Peter Sweeney
ps9zrhmc@miamiu.acs.muohio.edu
Xref: sparky comp.unix.questions:5944 comp.unix.wizards:2123 comp.unix.sysv386:8280
From: guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Setting Process priority
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:28:33 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara

>Take look at man setpri.

	auspex% man setpri
	No manual entry for setpri.
	auspex% cat /etc/motd
	SunOS Release 4.1.1 (AUSPEX) #1: Tue Nov 12 17:08:30 PST 1991

Try again.  The original poster, alas, didn't say what flavor of UNIX
he's running; perhaps

>Setpri changes the kernel priority. 

on the system on which *you're* running, but it doesn't even exist on
the one I'm running, and that function may either not exist or may exist
under a different name on other flavors of UNIX.

>N.B. After this is done (by root only), the normal nice adjustments
>are no longer done.

On *some* systems, doing a "nice()" or "setpriority()" with a negative
value may cause that to happen.
From: eam@cuuxb.ATT.COM (~16DM30100~Ed Marczak~~xxx~xxxxxxx~)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: UNIX equiv. of CLS for ATT605?
Date: 8 Apr 92 14:49:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: cuuxb.7329
Reply-To: eam@cuuxb.UUCP (Ed Marczak)
Organization: AT&T/NCR Software Services Division

In article <bill.702651896@chaos.cs.umn.edu> bill@chaos.cs.umn.edu writes:
	PS9ZRHMC@MIAMIU.BITNET (Peter Sweeney) writes:
	
	>Is there a UNIX equivalent for the DOS CLS command?
	>I'm using an AT&T 605 terminal.  When I log off, it
	>sends a clearscreen signal.  What is it doing?
	> 
	>And can I accomplish the same thing with a vt100
	>emulator via modem at home?
	> 
	
	>>try clear. ive seen it work on alot of different u*ix variations.

	"clear" for BSD, however, if you have SYSV try "tput clear"

		Later ... ed
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: roihar@cc1.crl.aecl.ca
Subject: scrawl or Brian Wilson...
Organization: AECL RESEARCH
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 13:47:36 GMT

Hi... I'm having problems running scrawl (March 1990 version) under OpenWindows
      3.0... I modified the code slightly to include large scalable fonts
      and this modification worked fine under OW 2.0. Now if I get a bit above
      a certain size font nothing is written to the screen when I type...
      Any ideas?  If not, could someone point me at Brian Wilson (the author)
      as he does not appear to be at cv.hp.com any more...
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: gcorke@wassily.carleton.ca (Graham Corke)
Subject: terminfo file
Summary: Looking for a termcap entry or terminfo file for a televideo 905 terminal
Keywords: terminfo termcap televideo 905
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 12:35:11 GMT

To anyone who has a termcap entry or a terminfo file (not compiled)
for a televideo 905 terminal. Please mail to gcorke@ccs.carleton.ca
Does anyone know the relationship between the tvi905 and the tvi912,
or tvi920 terminal capabilities.


                    So long and thank you
                    Graham Corke - gcorke@ccs.carleton.ca
From: etxtsil@kk152.ericsson.se (Torbj|rn Sellen TT/TSD)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: test
Summary: test
Keywords: test
Date: 7 Apr 92 15:53:12 GMT
Distribution: comp.unix.questions
Organization: Ericsson

test
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: moconnor@ef2007.efhd.ford.com (Mike O'Connor)
Subject: Re: How to determine originating host in .cshrc
Reply-To: Mike O'Connor <mjo@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com>
Organization: "Fordz"
Disclaimer: Not an official spokesperson for Ford Motor Co.
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 13:06:20 GMT

In article <THOMSON.92Apr14183336@zarda.macc.wisc.edu> thomson@zarda.macc.wisc.edu (Don Thomson) writes:
:Obviously UNIX knows what host you're coming from when you log in, as this
:information appears in a number of places (last, finger, who, etc.).  In what
:form is this information available?  The goal is to be able to use it in a
:.cshrc file to take specific actions based on which host you're logging in
:from.

The info is in the kernel, and can be accessed with several methods.
It can also be found in /etc/utmp, which is what finger, last, who,
etc. get their information from.  Note that with most hostnames and
utmps, not all your hostname will appear.  

Under C, one could do a getpeername() or the like to determine the
host information.

In a script, one can get information from -- you guessed it -- last,
finger, who, etc.  The best way to get complete host information, as 
far as I can figure, is to use who/last/whatever and correlate it with
netstat.

   

-- 
 Mike O'Connor                     |  Ford Motor Company, USA
 Applications Systems Analyst      |  CPD P&MS ECC Core Software
 Phone #:  +1 (313) 390-4008       |  P.O. Box 2053, ECC MD-7
 Fax #:    +1 (313) 845-0576       |  Dearborn, MI  48121-2053
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: nowak@fraser.sfu.ca (Bradley Stephan Nowak)
Subject: WANTED : source for pty's for unix sysV .
Summary: Looking for source for pseudo terminals for system V
Keywords: pty, unix, system V
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 08:35:07 GMT


If any one could point me to streams source for pseudo terminals
for system V, I would appreciate it .

:)
From: who@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: what happened to ftp.uu.net?
Date: 9 Apr 92 12:39:17 GMT
Organization: University of Maine Department of Computer Science


	I'am also prevented from logging on as anonymous to ftp.uu.net.
Are there certain hours for anony ftp connections? Any one know whats
up?
From: guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: What is the POSIX call for microsecond sleep?
Date: 11 Apr 92 01:02:13 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara

> POSIX.4, which is still in the draft standard stage (i.e., has not been
> approved) has the reltimer() call provides nanosecond (!) resolution.

Is that real, or just nominal, nanosecond resolution?

> OSF/1 a trial use of reltimer() which has nanosecond resolution.  The
> SVR4 systems have setitimer() which has microsecond resolutio.

Ditto.  "setitimer()" came from 4.2andupBSD; in 4.2andupBSD, and in many
systems that have picked it up from there, the resolution is only
nominal.  I.e., the "system clock" generates interrupts every 1/50th to
1/100th of a second or so, and the timer really has only 1/50th to
1/100th of a second resolution.

BSD actually rounds the timer value up to the clock resolution (which is
used in a sleazy hack by "gprof" to find the resolution), so that if you
set "it_value" to zero and "it_interval" to one microsecond with
"setitimer()", and read the value back with "getitimer()", you get the
value of one clock tick).

Do any of the systems listed above give real one-microsecond or
one-nanosecond resolution?
From: pd@x.co.uk (Paul Davey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: How to copy to another machine's /dev
Date: 9 Apr 92 17:40:12 GMT
	<1992Mar30.040546.25111@lth.se> <id.LSIO.AS3@ferranti.com>
	<1992Apr7.182123.19781@cirrus.com>
Organization: IXI Ltd.

>>>>> On 7 Apr 92 18:21:23 GMT, dhesi@cirrus.com (Rahul Dhesi) said:

Rahul> If DESTROOT is changed to be "/", this Makefile will access
Rahul> "//vmsgty", and it's not clear that the user wants that to
Rahul> refer to some other system on the network.  This is partly why
Rahul> UNIX treates "//" as if it were "/./" which in turn is the same
Rahul> as "/" alone, and why no other system should try to give "//"
Rahul> any other meaning.

POSIX has already defined that "//" at the start of a pathname may
have a special interpretation. (Like on Apollo workstations.)

Everywhere else multiple "/"s is are collapsed to a single "/".

(Personally I always liked the Newcastle method of going up from root,
since "/../somenode" is less likely to acidentally break software than
"//somenode".)


Rahul> Even worse, if DESTDIR is also defined to have a leading slash,
Rahul> the total pathname begins with three slashes.  What does that
Rahul> do to your system?

POSIX says this is the same as one "/".


So you could set DESTROOT as "/./" or "//" safely.
--
 Regards,			  pd@x.co.uk           IXI Ltd.
	Paul Davey		  pd@ixi.uucp          62-74 Burleigh St.
				  ...!uunet!ixi!pd     Cambridge,  U.K.
 "These are interesting times"    +44 223 462 131      CB1  1OJ
Xref: sparky comp.unix.questions:6240 comp.sys.sun.hardware:1716 comp.sys.sun.misc:1950 comp.sys.misc:430
From: jll40@duts.ccc.amdahl.com (Jonathan L Lemon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.sys.sun.misc,comp.sys.misc
Subject: Re: Summary of Auspex Experiences
Keywords: Auspex
Date: 15 Apr 92 23:26:25 GMT
Reply-To: jll40@DUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Jonathan Lemon)
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA


We also have an Auspex here at Amdahl, and haven't really had any problems
with it -- One definite thing that I like about it is that it is MUCH 
quieter than a SUN 4/490.  (Our 490 has a _really_ noisy fan...)

However, there is one sticking point that I currently have with the Auspex --
it won't work with the amd automounter.  Something about it causes the Auspex
to panic every now and then.  This is a big problem to my point of view, as
the SUN automounter definitely does _not_ cut it for all the mounts that
we have.
--
Jonathan Lemon					jlemon@pswd.amdahl.com
Diagnostics Development, Amdahl Corp.
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computer Network
Date: Wednesday, 15 Apr 1992 16:39:57 CDT
From: <NIBMSCM@NDSUVM1.BITNET>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Curse(ing) Control Keys

So, the application we're trying to write here is working quite well
with the curses library controlling keyboard input and screen display.
BUT, can't seem to properly map the "control" keys on the keyboard (minor
keys like the cursor keys, backspace, etc..).  ENTER works fine, but
that's about it.

Any suggestions or pointers (C pun) would be appreciated.  We're working
with the bundled C compiler on SunOS 4.1.1.  Thanks...
 ___________
|           |   Regards,
| ND  ----> *      Steve Malme    -->steve@fbsdata.com<--
|____________|      FBS Data Systems  nibmscm@ndsuvm1.bitnet
Nike - "Just do it"
From: bruce@blilly.UUCP (Bruce Lilly)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Question for net.views column in UNIX Today!
Date: 7 Apr 92 23:12:32 GMT
Followup-To: comp.unix.questions
Organization: Bruce Lilly
X-Original-Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec,comp.windows.x,comp.unix.xenix.sco,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.windows.misc,comp.unix.msdos,comp.unix.admin,comp.os.misc,comp.unix.questions,comp.sys.hp

[If you feel that you must post to 10 assorted newsgroups,
please set a Followup-To: header]

In article <1992Apr1.161010.11988@auto-trol.com> marbru@auto-trol.com (Martin Brunecky) wrote:
>
>  This exactly the attitude that made Ken Olsen's "snake oil" statement
>  utterly true.

I never doubted that *Ultrix* was/is snake oil, about which
Olsen is/was uniquely qualified to comment, though I wouldn't
trust his opinion about *real* UNIX(R).  (0.01 :-)

-- 
	Bruce Lilly		blilly!bruce@Broadcast.Sony.COM
					...uunet!sonyusa!sonyd1!blilly!bruce
From: tomj@MONSTER.SAIC.COM (Tom Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: tar question (summary)
Date: 8 Apr 92 13:14:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: monster.29701.tomj

Thanks to those who kindly responded to my question concerning
restoring tar files to a directory other than the original
source directory.

And the answer is (drum roll, please......):
Get a REAL version of tar.  GNU tar seems to be a common choice.
Modifying the file names in the tar structure is risky, because of
the tar checksum, but can be done if you only reorder the characters
in the file name without changing any.

The more I hear about GNU, the better it sounds!!!

Also, apologies to those who tried to e-mail to me and couldn't.  My mail
setup added an extra .com to my return address.  The problem has been
fixed.

Again, thanks!!
tom
Xref: sparky comp.unix.questions:6259 comp.sys.sun.hardware:1728 comp.sys.sun.misc:1960 comp.sys.misc:431
From: jll40@duts.ccc.amdahl.com (Jonathan L Lemon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.sys.sun.misc,comp.sys.misc
Subject: Re: Summary of Auspex Experiences
Date: 16 Apr 92 19:20:59 GMT
Reply-To: jll40@DUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Jonathan Lemon)
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <TPAQUETTE.92Apr16083614@ibm.ita.lgc.com> tpaquette@ita.lgc.com (Trevor Paquette) writes:
>In article <3f9O028w10yQ01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> jll40@duts.ccc.amdahl.com (Jonathan L Lemon) writes:
>
>> We also have an Auspex here at Amdahl, and haven't really had any problems
> ...
>> However, there is one sticking point that I currently have with the Auspex --
>> it won't work with the amd automounter.  Something about it causes the Auspex
>
>  Have you tried the latest version of AMD? 5.3 beta I believe.
> Available on usc.edu in pub/amd

Hmm... no.  I'm still using 5.3 Alpha.  Does the Beta version fix the
problem?
--
Jonathan Lemon					jlemon@pswd.amdahl.com
Diagnostics Development, Amdahl Corp.
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Xref: sparky comp.unix.questions:6246 comp.unix.wizards:2227 comp.unix.sysv386:8708
From: gram@aim1.aztec.co.za (Graham Wheeler)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards,comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: SVR4 network problem
Date: 16 Apr 92 08:22:59 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Aztec Information Systems

I had a lot of replies about this, including a reply from Dell (originally
Dell wrote that they only gave support to people running their hardware. With
all due respect, that is one of the dumbest support policies I've ever heard.
I suggested that that was not a good way to sell an operating system, and
since then they've been most helpful 8-) ).

The first way I solved the problem was by changing /etc/netconfig, which had
the name2address modules in the order:

/usr/lib/resolve.so,/usr/lib/tcpip.so

The resolve.so module was trying to find a nameserver, with an exponentially
increasing timeout. This accounted for the delays. Eventually it would give up,
and the tcpip.so module would look at /etc/hosts. I found that swapping the
order of these two improved things, but not completely (I'm still not sure why).
Taking resolve.so out entirely worked perfectly.

Ultimately, this was a fix, but not the solution. The real problem was that
the /etc/resolve.conf file had the line:

nameserver 192.96.22.1

(the latter part being the IP address of the same machine). So telnetd.in etc
were trying to use RARP or something to get the address, when the machine
wasn't actually set up as a nameserver. By changing this file to just have the
line `nonameserver', the problem was solved with no need to modify the
/etc/netconfig file.

Thanks to all those who responded. I can now create telnet sessions and pop
up X windows with negligible delays. 8-)


-- 
Graham Wheeler                     | "That which is weak conquers the strong,
Software Systems Engineer          | that which is soft conquers the hard."
Aztec Information Management       | 		Lao Tzu - Tao Te Ching Ch. 78
gram@aim1.aztec.co.za              | There's no justus; there's just us
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: dsdg7102@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Dane Steven Dwyer)
Subject: Will the /etc/aliases file do what I need?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 22:45:36 GMT

This is the configuration:

	Server: Sun4/280 running sunOS 4.0.3 (soon to be updated to
		4.1.1) and NIS (Yellow Pages).

	Diskless Client: Sun3/50 that boots off the server and also
		runs NIS.

I need to completely remove the sun3/50 from the system.  How can I
force the server to intercept all mail destined for the machine
that no longer exists and forward it elsewhere.  I have experimented
with the /etc/aliases file, but I have no idea what I'm doing (It
doesn't seem to work right; maybe I need to turn off the 3/50 first?).
I also keep reading about a mail.aliases file with NIS, but the
documentation is very sketchy.

Has anybody had experience with this?  Any advice would be much
appreciated.

	Thanks,
		Dane Dwyer
		dwyer@geisel.cc.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: dailey@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (John H. Dailey)
Subject: User lockout question
Keywords: Password security
Organization: Cornell Theory Center
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 15:34:05 GMT

 Does anyone know of a way to lockout a user account that has N failed
login attempts (in a row) against it. In other words, a way to make that account
inactive until an administrator has a chance to investigate.  While the
platforms will be Sun Sparc-2's I would prefer a vanilla UNIX solution
if possible. Thanks in advance.
             -John Dailey


Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: mln@sunkj.larc.nasa.gov (Michael Nelson)
Subject: Re: more OSF/1 vs SVR4 (text)
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 14:56:06 GMT

Again, another slightly updated version.  Please comment.
Thanks.

Michael Nelson
----

Compatibility:

This really means compatibility with respect to standards.  Both seem
compliant to the major standards.

-both SVR4 and OSF/1 are both compliant with the following standards:
        ANSI C
        POSIX 1003.1
        XPG/3 (X/Open level 3 base system)
        Application Environment Specification (AES)
        System V Interface Definition (SVID) (issue 3)

-DEC OSF/1 is also claiming compliance to POSIX 1003.4 (real time) 3

Openness:

This is not a well defined term.  OSF likes to talk about this a lot, but
it would seem that everyone can claim this to an extent.  Comments about
this would be welcome, especially how one is "more open" than others.

-Is OSF/1 source code not available?  2
 (McNealy seems to make this claim - thus SVR4 is "more open.")

Innovation:

OSF/1 claims these features.  Anything SVR4 does that OSF/1 can not claim?
Can SVR4 claim these?

-threads
-external memory management
-B-1 security (with B-2 and B-3 features)
-separation of system functionality allows several OS services to be running
 on the same platform (ie, running OSF/1, BSD and MS-DOS simultaneously)

Architectural Direction:

OSF/1 is based on the MACH kernel.  This kernel boasts "integral support
for multiprocessor hardware and an integrated threads facility."  The claim
is that threads make it more suited for suited for multiprocessing than
modified SVR4 for this purpose.  Clearly, OSF is anticipated the spread of
massively parallel computing into mainstream computing.

Availability:

OSF/1 is so innovative that it really does not exist yet.  DEC is the only
company that has a currently marketable version of OSF/1.  Many people seem
dissatisfied with OSF/1 that is always on the horizon.  Though the  DEC
versions seem to be stable, questions remain about the stability of HP and
IBM versions when they arrive.

--
from -
1 "Unix Variants",Unix Review, April 92
2 "McNealy: Unix is not confusing", The Sun Observer, March 92
3 evans@zk3.dec.com (Marc Evans)
From: root@cpp.uucp (Rich Bauer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Dialer
Keywords: Dialer, Hayes Ultra 144
Date: 7 Apr 92 22:07:04 GMT
Organization: Critical Path Project

I am getting two Hayes Ultra 100% compatible modems and need to run
them under Xenix.  There is no dialer for this type of modem.
What do I need to do?  The EFS 111 is for Unix only.  Is there a
version that someone has hacked for Xenix?

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
| Rich Bauer - Critical Path Project Inc.                 |
| UUCP...!dsinc!jabber!phlpa!cpp!rich  or rich@cpp.UUCP   |
-----------------------------------------------------------