HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jpr@jpradley.jpr.com (Jean-Pierre Radley)
Subject: Re: How to chop up an archive.tar.Z file like in the X distributions?
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 02:16:21 GMT
Organization: Unix in NYC

In article <1992Dec19.053319.12598@jpradley.jpr.com> jpr@jpradley.jpr.com (Jean-Pierre Radley) writes:
>In article <1992Dec15.142232.1@cc.utah.edu> eyring@cc.utah.edu writes:
>>
>>Could someone tell me what unix utility was used to chop up 
>>the big archive.tar.Z files into the smaller but all the same
>>size files?
>
>When I'm faced with this task, I run "chunk":
>
>: chunk - breakup a file into SIZE chunks called PREFIX01, PREFIX02, ...
># @(#) JPRadley 10 Jan 91
>[ ! -r "$1" ] && echo "Usage: $0 file [prefix [size]]" && exit
>IN=$1 
>PREFIX=${2:-chunk}
>SIZE=${3:-100000}
>N=0
>while :
>do
>	T=`expr $N + 1`
>	[ $T -le 9 ] && T=0$T
>	dd count=1 bs=$SIZE if=$IN skip=$N of=$PREFIX$T
>	[ ! -s $PREFIX$T ] && rm $PREFIX$T && break
>	N=`expr $N + 1`
>done
>l $PREFIX* $IN


That was last week. Now I'd use "mkparts":


:
# @(#) mkparts - chop a file into ~SIZE parts called PREFIX01, PREFIX02, ...
# Each part, save the last, will be one byte larger than the one before it,
# so that "by their size shall you know them".
# @(#) JPRadley & RCStockler 22 Dec 92 - v1.0
# N.B.: If your 'dd' doesn't understand 'iseek', use 'skip' instead.

[ ! -r "$1" ] && echo "Usage: $0 file [prefix [size]]" && exit

trap 'rm -f $TFILE.* ; trap 0 ; exit' 0 1 2 3 15
IF=$1 PREFIX=${2:-part} SIZE=${3:-100000} PART=0 TFILE=/usr/tmp/mkp$$
rm -f $PREFIX*

while [ -s $IF ]
do
  eval `awk '
        END { printf( "SIZE=%d OLD=%02d PART=%02d", ++SIZE, PART, ++PART )
        }' SIZE=$SIZE PART=$PART /dev/null`
  dd count=1 bs=$SIZE if=$IF of=$PREFIX$PART 2>/dev/null
  dd iseek=1 bs=$SIZE if=$IF of=$TFILE.$PART 2>/dev/null
  IF=$TFILE.$PART
  rm -f $TFILE.$OLD
done

l $PREFIX* $1

-- 
Jean-Pierre Radley   Unix in NYC   jpr@jpr.com   jpradley!jpr   CIS: 72160.1341
Xref: sparky comp.unix.questions:14903 comp.unix.sysv386:17601
From: ricks@odin.isc-br.com (Rick Schaeffer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: What approach to CD-ROM?
Date: 23 Dec 92 01:11:05 GMT
Organization: ISC-Bunker Ramo, An Olivetti Company

In article <1992Dec22.213311.6149@cnw01.storesys.coles.oz.au> nigel@cnw01.storesys.coles.oz.au (Nigel Harwood) writes:
>I'm in a bit of a quandry about how to decide on a CD-ROM approach.
>I have a 486 ESIX UNIX system with a SCSI HDD which I also use for DOS.
>I would like to get a CD-ROM which I can use under Windows 3.1 but
>also under UNIX for PD software etc.
>
>I am told that packages like the Creative Labs CD-ROM package come with
>a CD-ROM drive which will only work if plugged into the sound board SCSI
>port and won't work properly plugged into a standard SCSI card (I have
>an Adaptec).  So this solution will work for DOS but should for UNIX?

Adaptec sells a CD-ROM aspi driver for DOS and windows.  Works just fine.
(At least with my Chinon 431).  As for Unix, I'm not aware that there
is a File System Driver available for CD-ROM.  You can access the actual drive as
a "raw" SCSI device but I doubt that's what you want.  There was a posting
a while back with a set of utilities that can read ISO9660 compatible CDROMs
but what is really neaded is an SVR4 Virtual File System for the ISO9660
standard.
--
Rick Schaeffer          UUCP:  uunet!isc-br.isc-br.com!ricks
ISC-Bunker Ramo                ricks@isc-br.isc-br.com
Box TAF-C8              Phone: (509)927-5114
Spokane, WA  99220      Home:  (509)928-3533
From: bab@se39.wg2.waii.com (Brian Button)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: recursive grep'ing
Date: 28 Dec 92 16:09:25 GMT
Organization: Western Geophysical Exploration Products
In-reply-to: cp78065@csie.nctu.edu.tw's message of 28 Dec 92 04:35:08 GMT


-->"Ji-Tzay" == Ji-Tzay Yang <cp78065@csie.nctu.edu.tw> writes:

Brad Banko (btb@NCoast.ORG) wrote:
: 
: 	A small question, is it possible to recursively grep files? This could
: be very useful, especially since many users on my unix box have files that con-
: tain illegalities. Any help thru e-mail would be greatly appreciated.
: 
: 
: -- 
: Brad Banko
: Internet : btb@ncoast.org
: 
: 

Ji-Tzay> Try the following line:

Ji-Tzay> find . -name "*" -print | xargs grep "YOUR PATTERN"

You should be able to drop the -name part, since you want all names.

Just use find . -print | xargs grep "PATTERN"

bab
--
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| Brian Button          | email : button@wg2.waii.com                        |
| Design Engineer       |         71023.276@compuserve.com                   |
| Western Geophysical   | voice : (713)964-6221                              |
| 3600 Briarpark        |----------------------------------------------------|
| Houston, Texas  77042 |                  Opinions Be Mine!!                |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
From: mbs@adastra.cvl.va.us (Michael B. Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: utmp problems
Date: 30 Dec 92 06:27:51 EST
Organization: Well, I haven't decided on a name yet...
DiMessage-ID: <mbs.1ido@adastra.cvl.va.us>
X-NewsSoftware: GRn-beta 1.16g (28.12.92) by Michael B. Smith & Mike Schwartz
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

In article <1hrp76INN5ji@zikzak.apana.org.au> zik@zikzak.apana.org.au (Michael :
> I'm running Amiga UNIX 2.1 on a system which is quite heavily loaded
> with a number of users. I have continuous problems with the machine
> getting confused between users. For instance "whoami" might show "zik"
> but "logname" tells me "brumby", which is patently untrue.

> It's a real pain when you get a talk request from someone and when you
> respond they get your talk request as if it came from someone else.
>
> Does anyone have a solution to these problems?

I don't have a solution, but I can tell you that it also happens on
Esix 4.0.3.  It is not an Amiga UNIX problem only....
--
  //   Michael B. Smith
\X/    mbs@adastra.cvl.va.us  -or-  uunet.uu.net!virginia.edu!adastra!mbs
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: crash@ckctpa.UUCP (Frank "Crash" Edwards)
Subject: Re: Amiga and UNIX -- What's the status?
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 18:10:08 GMT
Reply-To: crash%ckctpa@myrddin.sybus.com (Frank "Crash" Edwards)
Organization: Edwards & Edwards Consulting

jonathan@author.ecn.purdue.edu (Jonathan L Neuenschwander) writes:
>The latter was my biggest disappointment when Commodore released SVR4, 
>especially since Mac software will run on AUX, DOS and Windoze on iX86 UNIX

Oh really?  Strange, I've never been able to run Windoze code in the
DOS emulator...  Could you be referring to SoftPC on the SPARC?

>machines, and so on.  To have UNIX, AmigaDOS, and DOS/Windoze (via Bridge-
>board) all up and running at the same time would result in a truly amazing
>machine!  Any chance of seeing this happen, or is it relegated to world of
>"Gee, it'd be awfully nice if...."?

Gee, would it be awfully useful?

I agree about running AmigaDOS under SVR4.  But that's a mammoth
undertaking.  And a friend and I have considered writing a 386
simulator to run DOS code, but some of the complexities are
outrageous.  Not impossible, mind you, since IBM has already done it
with their PC-Sim product on the 6000's (much faster than SoftPC,
which also works).  But I don't have the resources that IBM has...

>Jonathan
-- 
Frank "Crash" Edwards          Edwards & Edwards Consulting
Fax:  813/786-6526             crash%ckctpa@myrddin.sybus.com, but please
Home: 813/786-3675             don't ask UUNET to route it -- it's sloooow.
    "An apple a day will keep the doctor away."
    "Perhaps, but will that work in NetHack 3.0, patchlevel 10?"
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Markus Wild)
Subject: Re: A3091 Errors
Organization: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, CH
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:53:53 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.070609.1384@amiserv.chi.il.us> brianv@amiserv.chi.il.us (Brian Vargyas) writes:
>The system will run fine anywhere from 2-12 hours (random)...with HEAVY
>disk activity until all the sudden the Maxtor drive light comes on and
>stays on as well as the A3000UX HD activity light.
>
>Being my 2 years experience with SCSI, I assumed it was a termination problem.
>Knowing things were already terminated "properly", I experimented with about
>every combination thinkable with no avail.
>
>Here is the error I get:
>
>a3091 0x49 0x70ECAF8

According to the sbic manual, this means : "An unexpected information phase was
requested. MCI define the SCSI bus phase with is requested. This is typically
caused by a phase change before the Transfer Count has reached zero or by
an unexpected phase sequence occurring during a Select-and-Transfer command."

MCI is 0x49 & 0x7, thus %001, which says it's a Data In phase.

So, I can't tell what might happen, this is what the controller chip
detects.

Since it's a rather strange problem, perhaps you'd have some luck replacing
the SCSI controller chip against a newer revision? There are some bizarre
oddities with the used WD/AMD chip, and certain revisions...

-Markus

-- 
Markus M. Wild    -  wild@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch  |  wild@amiga.physik.unizh.ch 
Vital papers will demonstrate their vitality by spontaneously moving
from where you left them to where you can't find them.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: Anu.Kapoor@launchpad.unc.edu (Anu Kapoor)
Subject: Re: The X Window System
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 05:50:44 GMT

In article <1011@yoda.omnicron.com> ag@yoda.omnicron.com (Keith Gabryelski) writes:
>In article <1992Dec26.215205.27877@samba.oit.unc.edu> Anu.Kapoor@launchpad.unc.edu (Anu Kapoor) writes:
>>Is there a cheap/easy way to run the X Window System on the amiga?
>><less than GfxBase's X Server>
>
>GFxBase's X Server *is* the cheap way to run The X Windowing System on
>the Amiga.
>
>If you want free you should write your own.
>
>Pax, Keith

From my budget at least, $399 is *far* from cheap. I believe PC's have 
several options for cheap/free X windows <i believe, correct me if I'm
wrong>. Isn't the 2 user version of AmigaUNIX like $599 anyway? I have a
14.4 modem and was wondering what the cheapest route to obtaining SLIP X.
Oh Well,
maybe I will have to write my own.

Cordially,
Anu Kapoor

--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
From: ag@yoda.omnicron.com (Keith Gabryelski)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: The X Window System
Date: 27 Dec 92 15:27:01 GMT
Organization: Omnicron Data Systems

In article <1992Dec26.215205.27877@samba.oit.unc.edu> Anu.Kapoor@launchpad.unc.edu (Anu Kapoor) writes:
>Is there a cheap/easy way to run the X Window System on the amiga?
><less than GfxBase's X Server>

GFxBase's X Server *is* the cheap way to run The X Windowing System on
the Amiga.

If you want free you should write your own.

Pax, Keith
From: ag@yoda.omnicron.com (Keith Gabryelski)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: Working audio driver source.
Date: 28 Dec 92 05:02:11 GMT
Organization: Omnicron Data Systems

Here is a patch to the audio driver posted earlier this week
that solves the problem I mentioned of skipping data if handed
small data packets.

It required changes to the service procedure and postaudio()
so that the initial play buffer is not written to the hardware until
it is full or the stream is empty.

Pax, Keith

*** audio.c	Sun Dec 27 23:56:27 1992
--- /usr/tmp/audio.c	Sun Dec 27 23:56:08 1992
***************
*** 498,525 ****
      mblk_t *mp;
      struct audio_client *acl = (struct audio_client *)q->q_ptr;
      int s = splaudio();
  
      /*
       * Service all requests possible.
       */
  
      while ((mp = getq(q, mp)))
      {
! 	if (postaudio(acl, mp))
  	{
! 	    /*
! 	     * Couldn't service this request so places us on the
! 	     * audio_clients list and we will be qenabled after
! 	     * the next write interrupt.
! 	     */
  
! 	    putbq(q, mp);
! 	    break;
  	}
  
  	freemsg(mp);
      }
  
      splx(s);
  
      return 0;
--- 498,539 ----
      mblk_t *mp;
      struct audio_client *acl = (struct audio_client *)q->q_ptr;
      int s = splaudio();
+     boolean_t needtoflush;
  
      /*
       * Service all requests possible.
       */
  
+     needtoflush = B_FALSE;
      while ((mp = getq(q, mp)))
      {
! 	int retval = postaudio(acl, mp);
! 
! 	if (retval == -1)
! 	    needtoflush = B_TRUE;
! 	else
  	{
! 	    needtoflush = B_FALSE;
  
! 	    if (retval)
! 	    {
! 		/*
! 		 * Couldn't service this request so places us on the
! 		 * audio_clients list and we will be qenabled after
! 		 * the next write interrupt.
! 		 */
! 
! 		putbq(q, mp);
! 		break;
! 	    }
  	}
  
  	freemsg(mp);
      }
  
+     if (needtoflush)
+ 	(void) postaudio(acl, 0);
+ 
      splx(s);
  
      return 0;
***************
*** 561,569 ****
  	ach->filling->repeat = acl->repeat;
      }
  
!     mp->b_rptr +=
! 	fill_buffer(ach->filling, (signed char *)mp->b_rptr, blklen(mp));
  
      if (!ach->playing)
      {
  	/*
--- 575,591 ----
  	ach->filling->repeat = acl->repeat;
      }
  
!     if (mp)
!     {
! 	int given = mp->b_wptr - mp->b_rptr;
  
+ 	mp->b_rptr +=
+ 	    fill_buffer(ach->filling, (signed char *)mp->b_rptr, blklen(mp));
+ 
+ 	if (!ach->playing && given && !(mp->b_wptr - mp->b_rptr))
+ 	    return -1;
+     }
+ 
      if (!ach->playing)
      {
  	/*
***************
*** 598,604 ****
  	AMIGA->intena = AINTSET | ach->dmadone; /* Enable interupts */
      }
  
!     return mp->b_wptr - mp->b_rptr;
  }
  
  static struct audio_channel *grab_channel(struct audio_client *acl)
--- 620,629 ----
  	AMIGA->intena = AINTSET | ach->dmadone; /* Enable interupts */
      }
  
!     if (mp)
! 	return mp->b_wptr - mp->b_rptr;
!     else
! 	return 0;
  }
  
  static struct audio_channel *grab_channel(struct audio_client *acl)
From: rhealey@rogue.digibd.com (Rob Healey)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: A3070 tape drive, Amiga Unix, and AmigaDOS
Date: 21 Dec 92 23:28:50 GMT
Organization: DigiBoard Incorporated, Eden Prairie, MN

In article <Dec18.211722.23733@cdsac.uucp>, scotte@cdsac.uucp (L. Scott Emmons) writes:
|> Does anyone know if the A3070 tape drive is compatable with the BRU
|> program (called by the HDBackup program) in AmigaDos?
|> 
	Yes, BRU uses scsi.direct.

|> Software Hut (180093AMIGA) is selling A3070 drives for $349, which
|> is quite a good price...Are there any better deals on tape drives?
|> Will I have to buy the special ROMs for compatibility if I buy a
|> different drive, or are the ROMs just for speed (A3070 is advertised
|> at 3Megs/Min).
|> 
	You can't read the 60M format as the 3070 has ROMs that
	sacrifice the 60M format in favor of higher speed.

|> Also, is Amiga Unix still shipped on 150MB tapes? I had heard at one
|> time that it was going to be shipped on 250MB tapes starting with
|> release 2. My Amiga Unix was preinstalled by the dealer, and thus I
|> have no idea about what tape format it was...
|> 
	If you can get AmigaUNIX 2.1 it is a 250M format tape. 3070's do
	just fine with 250M tapes. The urban legend is that you stick
	with one size, 150M or 250M, and never switch or else you do weird
	stuff to the tape heads.

		-Rob
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: crash@ckctpa.UUCP (Frank "Crash" Edwards)
Subject: Re: A3070 tape drive, Amiga Unix, and AmigaDOS
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 13:27:17 GMT
Reply-To: crash%ckctpa@myrddin.sybus.com (Frank "Crash" Edwards)
Organization: Edwards & Edwards Consulting

scotte@cdsac.uucp (L. Scott Emmons) writes:
>I wrote:
>>My 2.1 tape, dated 3/25/92, is a DC6250 tape (as indicated by the
>>printing on the back of the cartridge).
>
>But is it in QIC150 format?

Yes.  The tape is in "stacked" format, which means that multiple
"filesets" (for lack of a better term) are written onto the tape with
filemarks between them.

I say that because the install script uses /dev/rmt/4h which is the
high-density device driver interface.

>			   L. Scott Emmons
-- 
Frank "Crash" Edwards          Edwards & Edwards Consulting
Fax:  813/786-6526             crash%ckctpa@myrddin.sybus.com, but please
Home: 813/786-3675             don't ask UUNET to route it -- it's sloooow.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: sevigny@babbage (Benoit Sevigny)
Subject: Re: AMIGADOS <=> UNIX problems
Organization: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 07:15:47 GMT

Frank Crash Edwards (crash@ckctpa.UUCP) wrote:
: what the high-level format does.  There is currently no high-level format
: for the AmigaDOS filesystem(s) under Amix.  (Although my virtual
: filesystem under Amix will soon have the equivalent "mkfs" command
: which will do what you want.)
: 

An AmigaDOS FileSystem for AMIX!!!

: Those folks that are using the VFS:  what's happening?  Should I go
: ahead and release the code?  Has anyone had problems reading AmigaDOS
: files from Amix?  (Besides the fact that it's sloooow -- I know about
: that one. :-)

Does your VFS R/W AmigaDOS Partitions?

: -- 
: Frank "Crash" Edwards          Edwards & Edwards Consulting
: Fax:  813/786-6526             crash%ckctpa@myrddin.sybus.com, but please
: Home: 813/786-3675             don't ask UUNET to route it -- it's sloooow.
:     Very few profundities can be expressed in less than 80 characters.

--
-=*                                                                         *=-
   __ Skipping every ?86 numbered lines in your code will remove all your
__/// remaining bugs and bottlenecks 8^)
\XX/  Benoit W Sevigny, software engineering student, sevigny@info.polymtl.ca
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: brianv@amiserv.chi.il.us (Brian Vargyas)
Subject: A3091 Errors
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 07:06:09 GMT
Organization: Another Amiga UNIX System

Hello!

I've got a semi-serious problem on my hands that has gotten out of my
control.  I've been getting on a regular basis a A3091 error that I have
no idea what it means or causing it.

I've got a A3000UX with a 1.7GB Maxtor and 52Q Quantum drive.  The Maxtor
and Quantum are in a external case with the Maxtor terminated.   There are
NO drives inside the A3000UX, however, the Rev 8. motherboard is properly
terminated.  The cable length total is only about 3-4 feet in length from
end to end.

The system will run fine anywhere from 2-12 hours (random)...with HEAVY
disk activity until all the sudden the Maxtor drive light comes on and
stays on as well as the A3000UX HD activity light.

Being my 2 years experience with SCSI, I assumed it was a termination problem.
Knowing things were already terminated "properly", I experimented with about
every combination thinkable with no avail.

Here is the error I get:

a3091 0x49 0x70ECAF8

This error is very consistant, and doesn't change in value.  I've started to
mess with jumper settings on the Maxtor drive, but still have had no luck.

Also, a Disk Block Scan via an AmigaDOS program from GVP comes up with a clean
slate, and no errors are reported for the entire drive...so I've outruled a
bad block somewhere on the drive.  Does anyone at all have a clue as to
what that error means, and what I might be able to do to avoid it.  If it
means anything, I've also tried a completely different A3000UX machine and
the same problems come up.  Keep in mind, things will work fine for quite
some time, and with some heavy disk activity too...    My feeling is that
there is something incompatable with the A3000 and the 1.7 Maxtor drive.  God,
I hope not, I bought it for the reason of keeping news around awhile longer.

Thanks,  Brian Vargyas, Amiga Network Information Systems, Chicago, IL.

-- 
brianv@amiserv.chi.il.us    Amiga Network Information Systems
708-983-6678                AT&T SVr4 UseNet News/Mail Server
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: misar@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (walter misar)
Subject: Re: PD UNIX for A500 
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 14:35:14 GMT
Organization: TH Darmstadt
Keywords: Amiga

In article <9235809.28523@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>, peterg@acci.com.au (Peter Gill) writes:
> HI I am currently working in a UNIX environment and would dearly love to
> get hold of a PD version - with source - for my A500. (No source is supplied 
> with AIX -IBM UNIX)

Try Minix (I think it was PD, even so there is a version which is sold).
Minix was written by Andrew S. Tanenbaum and I think Minix comes with source
(at least there are books with the source, documentation and explanations).

-- 
Walter Misar                        It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly
misar@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de       unless one has plenty of work to do.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: won@cs.columbia.edu (Won Y. Kim)
Subject: Re: A3070 tape drive, Amiga Unix, and AmigaDOS
Organization: Columbia University Department of Computer Science
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 20:15:15 GMT

In article <BzMuK2.2v6@digiboard.digibd.com> rhealey@rogue.digibd.com (Rob Healey) writes:
>|> 
>	If you can get AmigaUNIX 2.1 it is a 250M format tape. 3070's do
>	just fine with 250M tapes. The urban legend is that you stick
>	with one size, 150M or 250M, and never switch or else you do weird
>	stuff to the tape heads.
>
>		-Rob

Does this mean that the legends is false??

(I certainly hope so!!)

Thanks.


-- 
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
>>	"It is better to invent reality then to copy it." 	<<
			- Guiseppe Verdi and any AI/VR nut.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
From: jonathan@author.ecn.purdue.edu (Jonathan L Neuenschwander)
Subject: Amiga and UNIX -- What's the status?
Summary: Is Commodore supporting UNIX still?
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: 23 Dec 92 07:25:07 GMT


Ok, I'm new to this group, so please forgive my dumb questions.  :-)

I'm wondering what Commodore's committment to UNIX is, i.e., Are they 
going to support it on the 4000?  Are they working on ways to run AmigaDOS
under UNIX?

The latter was my biggest disappointment when Commodore released SVR4, 
especially since Mac software will run on AUX, DOS and Windoze on iX86 UNIX
machines, and so on.  To have UNIX, AmigaDOS, and DOS/Windoze (via Bridge-
board) all up and running at the same time would result in a truly amazing
machine!  Any chance of seeing this happen, or is it relegated to world of
"Gee, it'd be awfully nice if...."?

Hope Not!

Jonathan


--
___ |Jonathan      |Internet:jonathan@mentor.cc.purdue.edu|Whom computers
|__||Neuenschwander|NeXTmail:buzz@symphony.cc.purdue.edu  |would destroy, they
|   |              |America Online:Buzz Lee               |must first drive mad
 
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga