HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: beckham@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Jeff Beckham)
Subject: Re: Ohio State @ Northwestern
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 21:05:27 GMT

scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn) writes:
>Eric West from N'western writes:
>> I still find it hard not to concede the Michigan game (although it will be
>> played here) and the Ohio State game (they're still good, and especially
>> tough at home; we'll just see if they ever have the guts to play games *at*
>> Northwestern...

OOOOOOOOOOhhhhhh... I'm scared.  Although we got beat by northwestern last year
at Northwestern, I don't think that our team was terribly intimidated (if at 
all!) by the roar of the N'Western crowd.  And I think that this year, we'll 
be getting our revenge at home...  Why don't we drop N'Western from the Big-10,
to make some room for another school... just an opinion...

>    Gosh, Eric, I seem to remember sitting in the nearly empty stands (Buckeye 

			        [... deleted ...]

>     P.S. Looks like I need to turn up my anti-woofing. Two weeks ago, I posted
>that I thought the Buckeyes were going to have trouble at Camp Randall. That 
>didn't do the trick. So let me just say this: The Illini will destroy us. 
>Level us. Verduzco (did I spell that right?) is going to pass for 400 yards and
>run for another 100. Predicted final score: Illinois 140, OSU -7. (There -- 
>that oughta do it!)

I think you're giving OSU a little bit too much credit... ;-).  Jason will come
out of his slump, and pass for over 700 yards.  Feagin and Jackson will be
rushing for a combined total of 500 yards.  I predict the score: Illini 221,
OSU 0 (give the team SOME credit...) ;-)


  			   	   --------------------------------------------
								  Jeff Beckham
						      beckham@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
 					 	  Computer Science/Mathematics
                                    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
				   --------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tshannon@ccad.uiowa.edu (Timothy J Shannon)
Subject: Re: UNI vs Iowa??? 
Organization: CAD-Research, U. of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 18:54:08 GMT

From article <1992Sep29.111609.7162@iscsvax.uni.edu>, by bohy6489@iscsvax.uni.edu:
> Speaking as a "UNI folk", I definitely would.  This year, anyway.  Seems to me
> that when UNI and ISU renewed the "series", Iowa was content to play Northern
> Illinois as their patsy.  Some claimed that Hayden was afraid to get beat -
> though the Hawks were for real at the time.  Perhaps the head Hawk was using
> foresight...

	Either that or Hayden knew that a win over a Division I-AA school would
be much cheaper than a win over a team that plays other Big Ten teams.  A win
like that is no good for Iowa in the rankings, it is no good for UNI in the
rankings, it is not even good for the fans to see a lopsided victory.  I don't
think that Iowa should play UNI until UNI starts D-I-A play.
-- 
___ ___ _   _    _       _             _
 |   |  | \/ |  (_  |_| |_| |\ | |\ | | | |\ | timothy-shannon@uiowa.edu 
 |  _|_ |    |   _) | | | | | \| | \| |_| | \| tshannon@CCAD.UIOWA.EDU
From: ds4@red5.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Arizona beats UCLA
Date: 5 Oct 92 22:16:14 GMT
Distribution: na

In article <23369@optima.cs.arizona.edu>, gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary L. Newell) writes:

|>  There has been a small amount of talk about the UA players taking
|> cheap shots (they knocked out at least 4 Bruins and ended the season of
|> a Miami lineman) but when you watch them they simply appear to be going
|> all out on their hits and not backing off as they did last season. In

Yes, they are going all out....all out to take the the knees out.  They are
going for the knees.  That is horrible, because you can really f*ck a guy up....
for life.  That is cheap, and they shouldn't allow that stuff on blocks.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ejk@dlogics.com (Edward Kaszubowski)
Subject: Re: Purdue-Notre Dame prediction
Organization: Datalogics, Inc.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 21:14:56 GMT

Kevin.T.Buttler.1@nd.edu (Kevin Buttler ) writes:

>In article <Bv5wEC.HyH@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, lillie@mentor.cc.purdue.edu 
>> 
>> Oh Kevin,
>> 	After reading the limited options you presented I thought I'd offer
>> a few more. These refer to the Notre Dame ego:
>> 			1) You can blame Lou for everything, especially for
>> 			   his conservative play calling.(Remember Penn State)
>> 			2) Everybody wants to go to Notre Dame because they
>> 			   need to build their own baseball stadium.
>> 			   (The Cove isn't good enough?)
>> 			3) Remember the good ole' days when we had Gerry Faust.
>> 

>Oh Chris,
>	Really...I haven't meant too many Purdue students (or alum for that
>matter)
>that love their school as much as you do.  After standing in the rain
>for 4 hours today and watching the Irish beat the piss out the boilers,
>I began to wonder why any one would consider hyping Purdue.
>				a) your team sucks
>				b) your campus is a dump
>				c) and your engineering program is overrated (entirely)

>> By the way their are no Notre Dame "wanna be" Purdue Alums, because no
>> Purdue graduates would lower their standards that far.
>> 
>In regards to that comment...I'm glad your proud of your school and all
>as long as you can accept the fact they you will still work for us some
>day!

Basically, we have one guy who proudly predicts a Purdue win, someone replies
with a "wanna be" comment (ha ha) and someone else retorts with "I wouldn't
lower my standards" comment (ha ha) ----
And then some ND dickhead has to go ahead and lambaste every aspect of the
school.  Nice, and typical.   

>Kevin Buttler
>Instructional Technology Lab
>University of Notre Dame
>E-mail:  Kevin.T.Buttler.1@nd.edu

Does "Instructional Technology Lab" mean you'll be a top-notch lab instuctor
someday, teaching about technologies that Purdue Grads invented?
-- 

Later.
  __________________________________________________________________________
 /                                                                          \
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mchenry@BAEPV2.NCSU.EDU (MCHENRY@BAE.NCSU.EDU)
Subject: Re: ACC Scores
Reply-To: mchenry@BAEPV2.NCSU.EDU (MCHENRY@BAE.NCSU.EDU)
Organization: North Carolina State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 16:21:21 GMT

>
>NORTH CAROLINA STATE 27 NORTH CAROLINA 20 (Predicted: NCSU 27 UNC 17)
>I almost hit this one right on the head. State scored on a 2 yard
>TD run with 1:01 left to seal the win. They have now won 6 in a row
>in this series. North Carolina suffers their first loss of the year.
>
Actually, you're a year ahead, that was the 5th straight Wolfpack victory
over UNC. This was by far the best perfomance by a Mack Brown coached
UNC team against NCSU but the Heel's still came up short. I have heard 
alot of "what-ifs" concerning this game but I think in general the UNC
defense's inability to stop the NCSU passing game was the story in this 
one. The Heel's kept coming back but I think most of the blue faithfull
knew that giving the ball back to State with 5 minutes left and the
score tied was not good news for the UNC. It will be interesting to
see how bad an impact this loss will have on UNC. They are fortunate
to have the worst team in I-AA coming to down this weekend because
they will be flat and their fans will be flat but Navy is bad enough
that it won't matter. It's the following week that should concern them,
a trip to Tallahassee, no doubt Charlie Ward will be licking his chops
as he watches the films of Terry Jordan picking the UNC defense apart.


KRM




Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick E Fleming)
Subject: Re: FSU-Miami-ND
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 16:37:51 GMT

Spiro the Spiny Goldfish writes:

>As they should have. Michigan, after all, didn't play for the tie.

First, let's consider the history again, shall we?  Consider the likelihood 
that a quarterback could choke and while intending to throw he ball away, throw
it straight to a defender.  Am I talking about Rick Mirer vs. Penn State?  No!
I am talking about Elvis Grbac vs. Notre Dame!  You really have to have a short
memory to forget the risks involved.

Second, let's consider the facts.  Lou Holtz was *not* seen on national TV 
frantically imploring the official to start the game clock at the end of the 
game (That was Gary Moeller.)  Also, It was not Notre Dame who failed to use a 
single timeout with the intent to force a punt from deep in their own
territory.  No, that was Michigan who ended the game with all three timeouts
remaining.  So who really played for the tie?

     - Pat
.
-- 
- Patrick E. Fleming ---------------------------------------------------------
- Department of Chemistry ------------ Some things are still a mystery to me -
- Ohio Wesleyan University ----------- While others are much too clear! ------
- pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu -----------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: FSU-Miami (one more opinion)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 02:57:24 GMT

In article <1992Oct3.025527.1@gallua.gallaudet.edu> 11telliott@gallua.gallaudet.edu (Zarathustra) writes:
>
>Linebackers- Miami has the best quartet of linebackers in the nation. FSU only
			    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I thought Miami played 3 LB set...

>Todd Elliott

Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: lauson@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Patrick W Lauson)
Subject: Re: football in Florida
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 17:00:24 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.150459.23490@cs.wm.edu> djryan@ct.cs.wm.edu (David J. Ryan) writes:
>Well, it still looks like Florida is another level below FSU and
>Miami. The Gator-faithful have been beating their chests for a 
>couple of years now, but I can't remember FSU or Miami losing
>back-to-back games in that fashion (at least not in the last 6
>years or so). In fact, FSU and Miami only lose like that to each
>other. I still say that FSU and Miami are the cream of the crop,
>the Arizona game notwithstanding.

Didn't FSU lose two straight quick ones at the beginning of the season like
2 or 3 years ago?  I am totally going by memory (or lack of) so forgive
me if I'm wrong.  
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
| Pat Lawson                     :  Go Buckeyes!!!!!!            |
| lauson@en.ecn.purdue.edu       :    Scarlet and Gray Rules!!!! |
------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: yl44729@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Rick Lin )
Subject: Re: Miami, Florida
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 19:11:09 GMT

ds4@soc6.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS) writes:


>So what you are saying, is that it is ok to tie, but not to win by one point?


Is it me or is Lou Holtz taking this conservative thing a little too far?
From: skiman@leland.Stanford.EDU (Nawwar Kasrawi)
Subject: AP and USA Today Polls
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 92 19:18:05 GMT

Could somebody please do me a favor and either post or e-mail the latest
AP and USA Today polls?  I can't seem to find them anywhere, and I
really want to know what the situaion is.

Thanks,

-- Nawwar

-- 
I*****************************************************************I
I Nawwar Kasrawi                  I  In any language, Cal Sucks!  I
I skiman@leland.stanford.edu      I  Go Cardinal! Go Cardinal!    I
I (415)497-2100			  I  Stanford Football Rules!     I
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: brown@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (john.carl.brown)
Subject: Michigan vs. Houston Tape
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 21:16:22 GMT


  I spent Saturday afternoon in a sports bar with 50 TVs, planning
on seeing the ABC regional coverage of Michigan vs. Houston.
They were unable to find it, which tee'd me off until folks who
had ordered it pay-per-view showed up after it failed to materialize
at their homes.
  I have seen a scant two plays from the game on the ESPN highlights
and am dying to see more.  I would deeply appreciate it if someone
who had taped the game and has facilities could make a copy for me.
Tape, mail, and time costs would be covered. 
  Please email if you can help me.  Thanks
John Carl Brown

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: crs@milton.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Subject: Re: MNC? How about the SEC?
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 04:45:06 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.182145.18590@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM> ldr@lightnin.Columbia.NCR.COM (Dale Robbins) writes:
>Hey guys!
>Everyones scrambling talking about Wash. or FSU or Miami as MNC,  but what about
>some of the other contenders..... Notably UT or Bama.  Either of these teams
>could end up unbeaten at the end of the year.  Is there no hope for these big
>time college powerhouses?!?!?!

Hmm, no not really.

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
University of Washington      *   water again!
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: fran@cs.washington.edu (Tak Ming Pang)
Subject: Re: Miami - FSU
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 16:43:28 GMT

In article <1992Oct04.221534.12065@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>In article <1992Oct04.175738.6048@CS.ORST.EDU> paasch@engr.cs.orst.edu (Bob Paasch) writes:
>>In article <vrcpfvg@lynx.unm.edu> jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund) writes:
>>>In article <BvKBp3.DEF@news.cso.uiuc.edu> pol30546@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Peder Larsen) writes:

...................

>
>I would say that a victory over the #3 ranked team is a pretty worthy 
>testament to things.  A victory over #20 is nice, but doesn't quite say 
>as much, espeially when the team losses it's starting QB.
>
>-- 
>David T. Meeks                    ||" We are jigsaw pieces, aligned on the 
>VMark Software, Inc.              ||  perimeter edge, 
>uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  interlocked through a missing piece"
>davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||" ...This world is totally Fugazi"

How good a victory is has nothing to do with the ranking of your
opponent. Only the performance of the participating teams counts.
From: randall@informix.com (Randall Rhea)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Stanford banned again
Date: 28 Sep 92 17:39:19 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Informix Software, Inc.

The Stanford Band was banned again ... this time by their
own athletic department.  They were going to do an "unauthorized
biography" of their new university president last Saturday, but their
althetic department forced them to change the show.  The LSJUMB was
also banned from Disneyland earlier this year. 

At least they were stopped before embarassing themselves again.
The previous posting's mention of the spotted owl show in Oregon
reminded me of what happens when the LSJUMB is left to their
own devices.


-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Randall Rhea                                        Informix Software, Inc. 
Project Manager, MIS Sales/Marketing Systems    uunet!pyramid!infmx!randall
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado)
Subject: Re: football in Florida
Keywords: FSU losing two in a row in one season
Organization: Florida State University Computing Center
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 22:57:05 GMT

Yes, FSU did lose two in a row a few seasons back ('89 I think). The losses
came against Southern Miss. and Clemson (payback for the "Rooskie"). I think
that the poster wasn't talking about these two losses...both were fairly
close games. But in Florida's case..they got blown out twice in a row. Same
effect...two losses...but FSU wins for style points. :)

Kevin



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: baze@carson.u.washington.edu (Behzad Khamneian)
Subject: Re: wuck fashington!!!
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 23:32:04 GMT

In article <1afq6sINN8nv@agate.berkeley.edu> clarko@rossini.berkeley.edu (Clark Olson) writes:
>In article <69638@hydra.gatech.EDU> mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:
> 
>>  STUFF DELETED
> 
>>IMNSHO, anyone who suggests that Miami/FSU would have blown
>>Washington away last year or that Washington would have blown 
                  ^^^^^^^^^
>>FSU/Miami away is a fool.  All 3 were very strong teams
>>and it's extremely doubtful either side could have dominated 
>>the other.  (BTW, I would have voted Washington #1, but that 
>>was practically a coin toss.)
> 
>>Mark Mitchell           Georgia Tech            mm42@prism.gatech.edu
>
>
>
>Sorry, wrong season Mark.  I think you would have voted Washington #1
>after the 1990 season when they were 10-2 and beat Iowa in the Rose Bowl
>not the 1989 season when they were 8-4 and beat Florida in the Freedom Bowl.

  Clark, I think that Mark is talking about the 1991 Washington team, not 
the 1989.  

>That was also not Washington's strongest team.  Both contestants were 7-4
>entering the game, rendering the result virtually moot when discussing top
>caliber teams.

  Agreed.

>Clark Olson
>clarko@robotics.berkeley.edu

Wo Gashington!!

-Baze  :)
From: 01jametzger@bsu-ucs.uucp
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: lliniwek (Big 10 marching bands - NOT!)
Date: 5 Oct 92 14:56:23 GMT

In article <16874A41F.SSQLCW@vmd.cso.uiuc.edu>, SSQLCW@vmd.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
> Hey guys, get a clue.  Big 10 bands march with music!!!  By definition that
> disqualifies them as potentially the best bands in the country.  When they
> show enough talent to memorize music and march at the same time then you might
> have a beef!!!And yes, I go to Illinois, home of Chief Illini-dick!!

Excuse me....pardon the impertinence...but how long has it been since you've
seen The Ohio State Marching Band?  To my knowledge they have NEVER marched
with their music...I attended an open practice two weeks ago in the Cincinnati
area, and even during practice, not a single member had a single piece of 
music.  And they do a new show every week as well....so, until you have
a bit more information, I suggest you not overgeneralize as such again...

>  
> War-Eagle (Auburn, where the band can march AND remember)
> Cameron Wesson
>  
> P.S.- Please take John Resigno back, we don't want him anymore!!
>  
TTFN,
  Jean
(I may be in Indiana, but I'm a Buckeye through and through..)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: Best marching band
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 12:40:51 GMT

In article <1ao4ufINN8j8@girtab.usc.edu>, swain@girtab.usc.edu (Ronnie Swain) writes:

> As a member of the Trojan Marching Band, I was at first inclined to be upset
.
.
.
> I know many people who hate USC, but love the band.  We have taken our entire
.
.
.
> In other words, you may hate us, we may be arrogant, but we still are the
> Best Marching Band in the History of the Universe.
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

!!  I like it!!  Pretty funny, pretty funny.  But didn't you mean to post
this to rec.humor??   ;-)

(in the History of the Universe???????)
-- 
David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
From: milius@proton.med.umn.edu (Bob Milius (BMEC))
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Who is number 1?
Date: 5 Oct 92 15:35:48 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota

In article <ASH.92Oct5090713@ulysses.mr.ams.com> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:
>
>Washington - played poorly against USC
>Miami - exciting but sloppy game.  Good defense.  Offense shaky all year.
>FSU - Nope.  Lost a game.
>Michigan - Perhaps the best team in the country right now, but has a tie.
>Texas A&M - barely beat texas Tech.
>
>
>Only Michigan had a good game this week in the top five.  Hopefully,
>several more weeks of football will clear things up a bit.  But I
>doubt it.
>

Don't discount Tennesee. If they can beat Alabama who haven't been tested
yet, they'd have a legit claim to it. They may have to do it twice. I'd 
like to think otherwise, but I don't think a Michigan has a chance at 
the MNC if there are any other teams with unblemished records.

-bob
a Michigan fan
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Milius                                        milius@lenti.med.umn.edu
From: azzarito@cse.fau.edu (Doug Azzarito)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: WEEKLY TOP 25
Date: 28 Sep 92 06:00:18 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA


      -----=====< The A.P. Top 25 >=====-----

THIS LAST
WEEK WEEK  SCHOOL      W L T  Last Week's Results          Next Game
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 1    2  Washington    3 0 0  -IDLE-                       v. SouthernCal,10/3
 2    1  Miami         3 0 0  WON v. Arizona, 8-7          v. Florida St, 10/3
 3    3  Florida St    4 0 0  WON v. Wake Forest, 35-7     at Miami, 10/3
 4    4  Michigan      2 0 1  WON v. Houston, 61-7         v. Iowa, 10/3
 5    5  Texas A&M     4 0 0  -IDLE-                       v. Texas Tech, 10/3
 6    6  Notre Dame    3 0 1  WON v. Purdue, 48-0          v. Stanford, 10/3
 7    8  Tennessee     4 0 0  WON v. Cincinnati, 40-0      at LSU, 10/3
 8    9  Penn State    4 0 0  WON v. Maryland, 49-13       at Rutgers, 10/3
 9    7  Alabama       4 0 0  WON v. Louisiana T.,13-0     v. S. Carolina,10/3
10   10  Colorado      4 0 0  WON v. Iowa, 28-12           at Missouri, 10/8
11   11  UCLA          3 0 0  WON v. SanDiego St.,35-7     at Arizona, 10/3
12   12  Ohio State    3 0 0  -IDLE-                       at Wisconsin, 10/3
13   13  Florida       1 1 0  -IDLE-                       at Miss. State,10/1
14   14  Virginia      4 0 0  WON at Duke, 55-28           at Wake Forest,10/3
15   15  Nebraska      3 1 0  WON v. Arizona St., 45-24    v. OklahomaSt,10/10
16   18  Georgia       3 1 0  WON at Mississippi, 37-11    at Arkansas, 10/3
17   17  Syracuse      2 1 0  -IDLE-                       at Louisville, 10/3
18   19  Stanford      3 1 0  WON v. San Jose St., 37-13   at Notre Dame, 10/3
19   20  Oklahoma      2 1 0  -IDLE-                       v. Iowa St., 10/3
20   22  Southern Cal  1 0 1  -IDLE-                       at Washington, 10/3
21   23  NC State      4 1 0  WON at N.Carolina, 27-20     at GeorgiaTech,10/3
22   25  Boston Coll   4 0 0  WON v. Michigan St., 14-0    at W.Virginia,10/10
23   --  Georgia Tech  2 1 0  WON v. Clemson, 20-16        v. NC State, 10/3
24   --  Miss. State   2 1 0  -IDLE-                       v. Florida, 10/1
25   16  Clemson       1 2 0  LOST at GeorgiaTech,20-16    v. UT-Chatt., 10/3

   Last week's casualties...

LAST
WEEK  SCHOOL       W L T  Last Game                   Next Game
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 21  San Diego St  1 1 1  LOST at UCLA, 35-7               at New Mexico, 10/3
 24  Kansas        3 1 0  LOST v. California, 27-23        v. Kansas St, 10/10