HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jdough@unf6.unf.edu (Joseph Dougherty)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: RUSH: OUT OF A JOB?
Date: 12 Oct 92 13:03:51 GMT
Organization: University of North Florida, Jacksonville

In article <2566.339.uupcb@eabbs.uucp> neil.black@eabbs.uucp (Neil Black) writes:
>What will happen in four weeks when Clinton is elected?  Will Rush admit
>that he's wrong and that Reagonomics were wrong?  Boy, wouldn't it be
>great to see Rush go away and someone intelligent like Ray Taliaferro
>take his place?  I'd like that....
>        

	You're kidding, right? First off, Clinto doesn't have a prayer  of
getting elected, despite what you read in the papers or hear in the polls.
	However, barring some real tragedy, suppose that cretin did win. 
Well, I think he's going to hear four years of pure hell from Limbaugh. 
Like it or not, Mr. Limbaugh's show, his TV program, and his book are here
to stay. Don't underestimate his intelligence one bit...the man isn't 
having the kind of success he is by being stupid. And have you bothered
to read his book. Though it's not full of any real surprises, it's well-
written, concise, and at the least, interesting. In fact, there's a 
passage about his dealings with the Pediatric AIDS Foundation that really
surprised me. When I think of the stupidity of the people involved in 
that situation, I realize how intelligent the guy really is.
	And who is Ray Taliaferro...? This is a world-wide net, you know?
From: greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu (Greg Trotter)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: "Proof" of liberal media bias
Date: 16 Oct 92 02:50:10 GMT
Organization: Gallifrey - Home of the Timelords
Originator: news@kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu

In article <YOUNG.92Oct15132929@ssdd475a.erim.org> young@ssdd475a.erim.org (Peter Young) writes:
>In article <1992Oct14.214550.14858@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu (Greg Trotter) writes:
>
>>   When we were *told* she told friends. Listen, only a handful of people
>>   claim that they were told.
>
>If she were concerned for her job, and felt that she couldn't go
>public, yet was driven to tell someone, it is entirely consistent that
>only a handful of people (most folks would probably only tell one best
>friend) were told.

If she made it up, it would make sense for her to get someone to say that
she mentioned it a decade ago.

Listen, my whole point is that only Hill, Thomas and God know what happened.
Regardless of what others may tell you, there were no eyewitnesses -- nobody
*saw* anything.

>>   If Anita Hill had brought her claims to a Grand Jury today or 10 years
>>   ago, it would never have seen trial. Her word against his. Innocent
>>   until PROVEN (*not alleged) guilty is still the docturing in the USA.
>
>You mean all those folks under indictment by grand juries never should
>have been indicted, since they are by docturing [sic] innocent?  Why
>do we bother with grand juries, then?

Peter, please don't make fun of my typos. Only make fun of my positions.

Please re-read that section you quoted. If you still don't understand,
read on:

FOR THE INTELLECTUALLY IMPAIRED: I asserted that, IMHO, if the charges had
ever been brought before a Grand Jury, it would never have gotten to court,
because the evidence simply isn't there. Peter equated that with some
preposterous assertion that all Grand Jury indictments were wrong.

Go figure.

						- greg

"You can't turn the WHite House into the Waffle House."
				President Bush, October 15, 1992
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Subject: Re: Simon Admits he's a Nazi
Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 20:13:57 GMT

In <1992Oct14.181218.26077@nas.nasa.gov>, Dan King writes:

>In article <1992Oct13.194614.14480@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.ed

>>I'm not a Nazi, in fact if you have read my previous
>>postings you'll see that one fundamental reason I oppose abortion is its
>>potential for use in Nazi-style eugenics.  I doubt I would last long under a
>>Nazi system.

I could see how this could potentially happen.  But until it really rears its
ugly head, we can't just assume that people have the worst intentions.

>At least just judging from what you have posted here so far, I doubt
>that what you say is true.

>Pro-choice believes that the person most capable to make their own
>reproductive choice is the individual (For some women).

Yes, but most "pro-choice" are inconsistent about the government's role in
abortion.  THEY MUST GET OUT OF THE WOMB...until it's time to fund the clinic!
That is hypocrisy.  What a woman does with her body SHOULD be her business.
But dammit, when *my* tax dollars are used, then it IS my business.  Leave my
wallet alone and I'll gladly leave the choice *entirely* to the woman.  That
sounds fair to me.

>Pro-life believes that this choice should only be up to the government.

True.  Technically, many anti-Roe people are NOT fundamentalists, they're just
Constitutionalists.  They believe in the Tenth Amendment and that the
Constitution leaves issues like abortion to the states.  Many people I know
who support abortion rights *still* think that Roe is bad law because it
violates the Constitution.  Me?  I'm anti-abortion and pro-choice.  As I said,
if you want abortion to *really* be none of my business (as it should be), then
don't make me pay for something that most religions forbid.  Making the
religious pay taxes to fund abortion is a crystal-clear infringement (IMHO) of
their First Amendment-guaranteed religious freedom.

Personally, I want as little power given to the government as possible.  Of
course, there are Constitutional requirements, but it should end right there.

>Guess which group has the higher potential to be used for
>Nazi-style eugenics?

To the extent that "Nazi-style" tactics can only be employed by governments,
then you're right.  However, there are still possibilities that hateful groups
can influence certain types of people to get abortions or "custom-tailor"
their children--government or no government.


Tim Irvin   j056600@lmsc5.is.lmsc.lockheed.com
*****************************************************************************
FLASH!  Card-carrying Libertarian attempts to solve problems realistically.
        Film at 11.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion
From: bboerner@novell.com (Brendan B. Boerner)
Subject: Re: Simon Admits he's a Nazi (no film at 11 due to lack of interest)
Organization: Novell, Inc. --Austin
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 15:14:22 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.194614.14480@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>In article <1992Oct13.024022.15517@jetsun.weitek.COM> nadja@jetsun.weitek.COM (Nadja Adolf) writes:
>>Thank you Simon. I always thought you were a fascist. Having you state it
>>plainly on the net is very honest of you.
>>
>So Orwell was then a fascist because he wrote about Big Brother in "1984"??
>I always thought that "1984" was a criticism of fascism/Nazism.  I'm
>automatically a Nazi for planning to write about how such a system could
>come to power under the right circumstances.  You might be getting fact and
>fiction a tad confused.  I'm not a Nazi, in fact if you have read my previous
>postings you'll see that one fundamental reason I oppose abortion is its
>potential for use in Nazi-style eugenics.  I doubt I would last long under a
>Nazi system.

Umm, I think that the reason why Nadja (and I and perhaps others) think
you're a fascist is not that you want to right the book that you're
describing, but that you are giving us the impression that you think
that the future your creating in your novel is a future you'd like to
see come true.  So Orwell's "1984" was a criticism of fasism/nazism -
is your novel a criticism of the police state which crushes all who
protest unpopular in unpopular causes (your rampant liberalism) or do
you revel in such a dream of the future.  From you're posts it seems
the latter.


Brendan
-- 
Brendan B. Boerner		Phone: 512/346-8380
Internet: bboerner@novell.com	MHS: bboerner@novell
Please use ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ if replying by mail exterior to Novell.
From: rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Organization: Rescorla for himself.
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 23:04:20 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.225849.13403@muddcs.claremont.edu> weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
>In article <1992Oct8.220710.27686@news.yale.edu> rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla) writes:
>>In article <1992Oct8.210535.22592@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> William.A.Hall.Jr.@dartmouth.edu (William A. Hall Jr.) writes:
>>>"Abortion is advocated only by persons that have themselves been born."
>>>-- Ronald Reagan
>>Similarly adoption and abstinence. How unsurprising to see such
>>vacuity from Reagan.
>	Hardly vacuity, you missed the point. He's suggesting that these
>people are advocating something that they would not have wanted done to 
>themselves.
Perhaps, but the comment is vacuous because anyone who advocates anything
is already born.

-Ekr


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Rescorla, DoD#431 (Nighthawk S)              rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu
Former chemist now CM400 mechanic                 ekr@eitech.com(preferred)
        "God gets off on a technicality. Film at 11" --CJ Silverio
From: eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Quayle won the debate.
Date: 15 Oct 92 17:12:41 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

msheldon@luna.dpl.scg.hac.com (Marti Sheldon) writes:
->Most people have trouble believing Clinton (indeed, it's the cover story 
->of this week's Time Magazine) and Dan kept hammering the issue."Do you really
->trust Clinton to be President?"  I think most would answer "no".  And he and
-
-MOST PEOPLE keep saying "Yes." Every day. Haven't you been listening to
-the public opinion.  Polls, the man on the street, the voter's registration
-numbers.  
-
-Most people are saying "No more Bush" "No more trickle down economics"
-"No more Republican lies."  You just aren't listening.

But that isn't a "Yes." You've just listed anti-Bush statements, not
pro-Clinton statements that answer the aforementioned question.
-- 
Emil Thomas Chuck		eyc@acpub.duke.edu
Biomedical Engineer 1993	Never take me too seriously.
I don't have to have a 4.0 GPA to succeed in life because I'm 
good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: reaper@wixer.cactus.org (Keath Milligan)
Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh on Feminism
Organization: Real/Time Communications
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 16:09:25 GMT

In article <Bvzu3I.M16@eis.calstate.edu> kmitche@eis.calstate.edu (Kenneth Mitchell) writes:
>lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich) writes:
>> 
>> 	It is sometimes said of RL's use of "feminazi" that there is a
>> certain kind of extremist feminist that it appropriately refers to.
>> While there are _some_ feminists that can be called extremists, I
>> think that RL is trying to smear _all_ feminists, since he has not
>> described what he considers legitimate feminist positions.
>> 
>> 	To make myself clearer on this, let us suppose that RL had a
>> habit of denouncing "shylock" Jewish bankers. Would it be a legitimate
>> defense of him to insist that some Jewish bankers are indeed little
>> better than loan sharks? This kind of remark would make it sound like
>> he considers _all_ Jews to be the sort of sleazy characters who become
>> loansharking bankers.
>> 
>
>Rush has said, about 8 zillion times, that he figures that there are less
>than two dozen "femi-nazis" in America; he defines "femi-nazi" as a person
>who gets angry when an abortion DOES NOT happen. 
>
>Ken Mitchell
>kmitche@eis.calstate.edu

Limbaugh started making these "clarifications" only after using the term
indiscriminately and receiving a lot of heat because of it.  It simply
isn't OK to spew hatred and say "but I meant something else" later and
think that will make it right.

-- 
oooooo ooo o o  o            Keath Milligan            o  o  ooooo oooo oooooo
oooo oo ooo  o   o   Prometheus Light and Sound, Inc.   o   o  o ooooooooooooo
oooooooo o oo  o         Real/Time Communications        o    o o ooo oooooooo
oooooo oooo ooo  o  internet: reaper@wixer.cactus.org  o   o  o ooo oo ooooooo
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:7148 alt.politics.bush:8708 alt.politics.clinton:9830 alt.politics.elections:16201 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6679 talk.politics.misc:51055
From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 00:51:52 GMT

<1992Oct2.042310.4735@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>Someone here has said that rights only apply if a fetus is aware.
>
>Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but can't a pregnant woman feel the child
>moving about??  Does that not constitute awareness??

Trees move in the wind.  Bacon moves when it sizzles.  Fires moves as its
fuel is consumed.


Gordon
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.activism.d,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc,talk.abortion
From: bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com (J H Woodyatt)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Reply-To: bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com
Organization: Abiogenesis 4 Less
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 16:55:17 GMT

William.A.Hall.Jr.@dartmouth.edu (William A. Hall Jr.) writes:
# regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
# > And if my mother, when she was pregnant with me, decided that pregnancy
# > and childraising was too much of a burden, and was FORCED to have me,
# > I'd have a lifetime of apologizing to do.
# 
# This is why all of you liberals are so whacked-out. Allow me to give
# y'all a lesson in Biology 101. When a baby is conceived, his/her
# genetic blueprint is formed. He (or she) is unique, and so are his/her
# characteristics -- big feet, blue eyes, brown hair, pug nose, et
# cetera. Before conception, that doesn't exist. Millions of sperm with
# millions of blueprints and millions of ovums with millions of
# blueprints are floating in their respective ovaries and vesicles. When
# the two are brought together, they form the blueprint for an
# INDIVIDUAL. When that individual is aborted, that blueprint for life is
# terminated. A baby that may have been a genius. The baby that may have
# the found the cure for AIDS, or the cure for cancer, now lying in a
# dumpster outside an abortion clinic. No, excuse me... following in the
# words of others on the net, that PARASITE is in the dumpster. Sorry.
# Excuse me.
# 
# When you PREVENT pregnancy, an individual blueprint for life is not
# terminated... because one was never made in the first place!

This why all of you conservative screwheads are so whacked-out.  Allow
me to give y'all a lesson in the economy of scale...

To employ a slogan once used to hawk junk food:  Crunch all you want,
we'll make more.

Oh, my Living ghod!  With millions of sperm and millions of ova, there
must be trillions, quadrillions of possible combinations that form the
blueprint (`specification' might be a better word here for analogy
with the genetic code in a zygote -- and most of us know what
`specification' really means) of individual humans.

And if just *ONE* of those individuals in production is intentionally
destroyed, then the awesome power of the state is required to punish
the offender for this awful, *heinous* CRIME AGAINST NATURE!

Imagine the nerve of some people -- wasting perfectly good zygotes and
embryos.  Who do these people think they are?  It's not like there's a
LIMITLESS SUPPLY or anything!


-- 
J H Woodyatt (a.k.a. Dr. Strychnine)
Space Systems/Loral

Oh, my -- three excamation points in the same post and it's only 10:00
AM.  I think I should have some more coffee.
From: kingsley@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Kingsley Morse)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 23:52:12 GMT
Subject: Please Help
Organization: HP Western Response Center
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview

              Please answer these 9 questions and return.

1.) Do you think equal rights for men and women is generally a good idea?
Yes                  [ ]
Sometimes            [ ]
No                   [ ]
Haven't heard enough [ ]
Other                [ ]

2.) Are you pro choice?
Yes                  [ ]
Sometimes            [ ]
No                   [ ]
Haven't heard enough [ ]
Other                [ ]

3.) Are you in favor of adoption?
Yes                  [ ]
Sometimes            [ ]
No                   [ ]
Haven't heard enough [ ]
Other                [ ]

4.) Do you think men should be allowed to legally terminate their parental
rights and responsibilities before fetal viability?
Yes                  [ ]
Sometimes            [ ]
No                   [ ]
Haven't heard enough [ ]
Other                [ ]

5.) What sex are you?
Male               [ ]
Female             [ ]

6.) How old are you?
Under 18           [ ]
19 to 65           [ ]
Over 65            [ ]

7.) What religion are you?
Protestant         [ ]
Catholic           [ ]
Jewish             [ ]
Other              [ ]

8.) What political party are you affiliated with?
Democratic         [ ]
Republican         [ ]
Other              [ ]

9.) How many years of education have you completed?
Grade School       [ ]
High School        [ ]
College            [ ]
More               [ ]
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview,comp.windows.open-look
From: doehr@magellan.den.mmc.com (Brett B. Doehr)
Subject: Re: Two questions about buttons
Organization: Martin Marietta Astronautics Group
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 16:02:30 GMT


In article <1bii0oINN5ee@skat.usc.edu>, olek@skat.usc.edu (Olek Proskurowski) writes:
|> 1. How to get default ring around arbitrary button ?

Try xv_set(panel, PANEL_DEFAULT_ITEM, arbitrary_button, NULL);


---------------------------------------------------------------
| Brett B. Doehr           Martin Marietta Astronautics Group |
| Voice: +1-303-977-1504   P.O. Box 179  Denver, CO 80201 USA |
| Fax:   +1-303-977-1530          Internet: doehr@den.mmc.com |
|    "What's wrong?!  I'm used to being the weirdest guy in   |
|     the room, and suddenly I'm not even in the running!"    |
Xref: sparky alt.toolkits.xview:959 comp.windows.open-look:4128
From: olek@skat.usc.edu (Olek Proskurowski)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview,comp.windows.open-look
Subject: Two questions about buttons
Date: 14 Oct 1992 18:37:28 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: skat.usc.edu

1. How to get default ring around arbitrary button ?

2. Second question is about PANEL_LABEL_IMAGE. Here is how I create button:

  save_image = xv_create(XV_NULL, SERVER_IMAGE,
                       SERVER_IMAGE_DEPTH, 1,
                       SERVER_IMAGE_X_BITS, save_bits,
                       XV_WIDTH, save_width,
                       XV_HEIGHT, save_height,
                       NULL);

  obj = xv_create(owner, PANEL_BUTTON,
                XV_KEY_DATA, INSTANCE, ip,
                XV_X, 88,
                XV_Y, 130,
                PANEL_ITEM_COLOR, gcm_color_index("green"),
                PANEL_LABEL_IMAGE, save_image,
                PANEL_EVENT_PROC, RecordDoneEventHandler,
                NULL);

It works just fine under OpenWindows and and X ( bw ). Under color X my
button looks like


           --------------------------------------
          /                                      \
          |     -----------------------------    |
          |     |                           |    |
          |     |           IMAGE           |    |
          |     |                           |    |
          |     -----------------------------    |
          \     |    extra rectangle        |    /
           --------------------------------------
                              ^	    
                              |	    
				    
Where does this small rectangle comes from and how to get rid of it.

Please email I'll summarize.

-- 
Olek Proskurowski					olek@skat.usc.edu
							olek@uscvm.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
From: markb@iplmail.orl.mmc.com (Mark Bower)
Subject: xview3.0 port to SGI 4.0.x
Organization: Martin Marietta
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 18:12:31 GMT

Has anyone ported Xview 3.0 to SGI 4.0.x?
If so, please email me whatever changes you made
or the binaries. Thanks in advance, Mark.
From: larry@ducktales.med.ge.com (Larry Landwehr)
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
Subject: Need an xview lockscreen prog for Sun sparc
Date: 9 Oct 92 14:22:31 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: GE Medical Systems, Magnetic Resonance

Does anyone have source for a lockscreen program that will run on a
Sun sparc-station under xview? The ideal one would unlock for the user's
password or for a global password. Also, it would be desirable for the
lock to take place if no one has pressed a key or moved the mouse for
ten minutes or so. Even source for a lock screen program with none of
the above features is welcome if it shows how to prevent the window
manger from moving, resizing or iconifying a window.
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview
From: barta@w6.infosys (Robert Barta, Assistent)
Subject: xarchie port to Xview
Reply-To: barta@w6.infosys
Organization: Inst. f. Informationssysteme, TU Wien
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 08:59:28 GMT

Hi folks,

Is there anyone out there already porting the xarchie client to Xview?

\Robert


---
  __
 /__/arta     | eMail: barta@infosys.tuwien.ac.at
/__/__        | pMail: Argentinierstr. 8/3.Stock, A-1040; Austria
   /__/       | Work : Institut f. Informationssysteme; TU-Wien
  /  \obert   | Phone: +43 1 58801 4425 (Fax: +43 1 505 84 53)

Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview,comp.windows.open-look
From: mazin@mr.med.ge.com (Barry Mazin 4-6073 MRCE)
Subject: SCROLLABLE_PANEL - help!
Followup-To: poster
Organization: GE Medical Systems, Magnetic Resonance
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 20:19:46 GMT

I am in the process of porting code written for Sunview to Xview.  I am having 
problems with the SCROLLABLE_PANEL.   The XView Programming Manual written by  
O'Reilly is of little help in explaining how to use it correctly.  I know 
that SCROLLABLE_PANELs are not Open-Look Complient but the code that I am 
porting relies heavily on this functionality.

The problems that I am having occurrs when I add Panel_items beyond the visible
portion of the panel.
1) The panel flickers everytime a new item is added.
2) Panel_items do not always become visible when the panel is scrolled.
3) If the panel is scrolled, and then from the panel's background process event the code calls a menu_show, the user can not select the items in the menu.

If anybody has a solution tor a workaround to the SCROLLABLE_PANELS, I would
appreciate your help.
Newsgroups: alt.toolkits.xview,comp.windows.open-look