HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jc@optimla.aimla.com (John VanHoozer)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Date: 31 Aug 92 16:38:44 GMT
Reply-To: jc@optimla.aimla.com (John VanHoozer)
Organization: OptImage Interactive Services Co., L.P.

In article <BiuBqB4w164w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us>,
elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
|> Along with many others here, I've been giving some thought to the demise of
|> this group.  I think we need to practice the politics of inclusion on this,
|> and
|> come up with an alt.fan group that will include not only Our Boy, but other
|> politicians and preachers (if one can tell the difference anymore in the GOP)
|> who are worthy of admiration, ridicule, scorn, etc.  Possibilities:
|> 
|> alt.fan.stupid-pols
|> alt.fan.radical-right
|> alt.fan.gop-crazies
|> 
|> The bottom line is that, in the first week of November, Dano will no longer be
|> fun to abuse.  He'll just slide back into the abyss from whence he came.  We
|> will still need a place to have fun with folks like Adolf Buchannan, Pat 'God
|> Still Talks to Me' Robertson, not to mention the silly Democrats that will
|> come
|> back out of the woodwork after the Clinton/Gore campaign removes their 
|> muzzles.
|> 


Perhaps we should leave things just as they are...  After all that would
prevent Dan's slide into oblivion.   May be the charter for a.f.d-q should
change to allow for ridicule and scorn of any politician.  DQ should remain
as a standard for us to measure other political idiots by.  It would
help keep on our toes: Be afraid.  It happened once.  Don't let it happen
again!  Be very afraid!

Just a thought.

			jc

-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
John C. VanHoozer			     |
OptImage Interactive Services Company, L.P.  |  uunet!{optimage,aimla}!jc
11040 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite #300	     |  Fax:  (310)445-5720
Los Angeles, Ca. 90025			     |  Phone:(310) 445-5721
___________________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer:
   Opinions,  yew doone neeed my steenkeeng Opinions.

Carpe Diem:  A carp a day, that's all we ask.
From: grue@csa.bu.edu (Philip Libin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Taxes
Date: 26 Aug 92 17:09:14 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <1992Aug25.214412.16503@odin.corp.sgi.com> lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford) writes:
>
>er ... I believe the point was that since unemployed people pay NO taxes,
>and since a *LOT* of people are now unemployed THANKS TO BUSH, Bush didn't 
>go back on his word to "lower taxes."  In other words, Philip was posting a
>funny.  :-)  (Philip, if I'm mistaken, please let me know so I can argue
>with you! :-) :-))
>


You've got it right.  Several people have misunderstood my post, and I
am deeply sorry.  I realize that posting a serious message to a.f.dq would
be very disturbing to many people.


I am also disapointed with the liberal media's misleading assertment that the
Democrats have a monopoly of the Organized Labor vote.  I understand that the 
United Brotherhood of Comedians has whole-heartedly supported the incumbent
ticket, and that Jay Leno is a leading (though shy) member of George Bush's
100 club.


Since I am one of those millions of Americans that are paying less taxes
under Bush, I've only got one thing to say:


>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>|    /)                      | Lana Mountford    
>|   / /  __    ___    __     | Silicon Graphics  
>|__(_/__(__)\__/  )__(__)\__ | Mountain View, CA 
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Is SGI hiring?





Phil Libin
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:3260 alt.politics.bush:3749 alt.politics.clinton:3729
From: dave@gergo.tamu.edu (Dave Martin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: "I can even forgive Bush for Dan Quayle, but not for this."
Date: 1 Sep 92 19:49:00 GMT
Organization: Geochemical & Environmental Research Group, Texas A&M University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <JASON.92Sep1124501@ab20.larc.nasa.gov>, Jason C. Austin <j.c.austin@larc.nasa.gov> writes...
}	I live on the coast of Virginia.  A few days is not long
}enough to organize an entire disaster relief system large enough to
}handle that level of destruction.  In order to handle an incident like
}this to the level people seem to expect would require millions (or
}more) dollars of yearly spending for something that will rarely be
}used.

Between hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, flooding, forest fires, and
volcanoes, not to mention man-made disasters (plane crashes, train derailments,
etc.) I would suspect that a well-prepared disaster relief system would be
used much more than "rarely" in a year's time. And why should the cost of
such a system mean that it shouldn't be done? Are human lives and relief of
human suffering/hunger/etc. not worth the effort or the money? Perhaps so.
That might explain why we spend so much each year on our military, which is
also "rarely" used. The only major difference is that a disaster relief system
would work to end suffering and death after a disaster, whereas the military
basically causes suffering and death *and* disaster. 

 -                                                                     -
 - Dave Martin - Geochemical & Environmental Research Group, Texas A&M - 
 - DAVE@GERGA[GERGO,GERGI].TAMU.EDU - BROOKS@TAMVXOCN.BITNET - AOL:DBM -
 -                                                                     -
Date: Thursday, 3 Sep 1992 16:07:24 EST
From: <CLINDSAY@vma.cc.nd.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Tucker's e-mail
 <1992Aug30.211143.8503@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
 <1992Aug31.145035.27504@javelin.sim.es.com>

I too think that harassing Dano's hapless offspring is poor form, and
would never do it.  However, think of what the anti-choice fanatics do:
harassing not only the doctors who work at the clinics but also their
spouses and children (up to and including death threats).  Some people
have no class whatsoever.  I for one will never stoop to their level.
Cathy
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: marvin@bluemoon.rn.com (Ben Scharp)
Subject: Depressing
Organization: Blue Moon BBS ((614) 868-998[024])
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 22:54:17 EDT

Well, I just all of the people who post here will be ready for Quayle 
1996! Scary thought but if Bush gets re-elected this November.....quite 
scary. Time to get that VISA I think.

Marv


---
Marvin the Paranoid Programmer
I can't get any work done with this pain in my diodes!!!
Marvin@Bluemoon.rn.com         Call the Metropolis at (614)846-1911
---
From: popec@fennec.sccsi.com (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Bush vomit
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 20:26:49 CST
Organization: Fennec Information Systems, The World View Magazine

A few posts back, there was a suggestion, Bush = To vomit.
In Japan the phrase that was coined was "Bushita", meaning to vomit.
Bushita! Bushita! Bushita!

----------------
William C. Barwell [popec@fennec.sccsi.com]  //  Pope Charles
Pope Of the Church Of The SubGenius for the Golden Triangle Area
Laughing at everything in the Universe...including the concept of 
laughing at everything in the Universe!
-----------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: dbj@cs.washington.edu (Dave Johnson)
Subject: Re: Dan's Kid Conceived Before Marriage?
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 92 20:59:15 GMT

In article <sysmatt.714729758@aix3090b.uky.edu> sysmatt@aix3090b.uky.edu (Matt Simpson) writes:
>zaccone@rigel.cs.bucknell.edu (Rick Zaccone) writes:
>
>>An article about Dan in last week's NYT mention that he and Marilyn
>>got married after dating just 10 weeks in 1974.  It also mentioned
>>that his oldest kid is 18 years old.  I'm wondering if this was a
>>shotgun wedding.  Does anyone know?  What are the dates of his wedding
>>and his oldest kids birth?
>
> If the limited info you have is correct, just apply mathematics. Even
> using the most favorable (for Dan and Marilyn) interpretation ...
> You say they dated 10 weeks in 1974 ... give them the benefit of the
>doubt, say they started dating 1/1/74. That would put the wedding around
> 3/15/74. Conceiving a child on their wedding night, and carrying him
>through a full 9-month term would place his birthday around 9/15/74.
>This would make him 18 years old or or about 9/15/92, which means if he's
>already 18, they fooled around. If they got married any later than March,
>he's got even less chance of being legal.
>
>Of course, we could rearrange the original statement, and say they got
>married in 1974 after dating 10 weeks, meaning they started dating in late
>1973 and married real early in 1974. This would make it a little easier
>to have a legitimate 18-year-old, but it's still pushing it. It would be
>interesting to get the accurate dates.

Don't forget what was posted here recently--someone said that
Marilyn chose to have labor induced during her pregnancly so
she could have the kid three weeks early so it wouldn't interfere
with her exam schedule.  So we already know she didn't have a
full 9-month term....
-- 
  Dave Johnson

"You're not too smart, are you?  I like that in a man."
    --Kathleen Turner in Body Heat 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl)
Subject: Re: Some rough comparisons
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 22:13:48 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM Rochester

|> In article <17fe1vINN5ge@agate.berkeley.edu>, mazzarel@spam.berkeley.edu (Ariel Mazzarelli) writes:
|> > 
|> > Quayle managed to graduate from De Pauw University with a GPA of 2.16. 
|>                                                                    ^^^^
|> > On a 4 point scale.  He served in the National Guard,  which was considered
|>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^    

     How did the guy sitting in the back of the class, head down, 
drooling on the desk, fast asleep become the vice president??  If Quayle
was a big drinker and partier in 1969 (the summer of love) maybe he was
quite the womanizer (freezing cold acorn).  Maybe some of the women he
was with will come forward (if they are not to embarassed).  This would
look real good with Dan being the CHAMPION OF TRADITIONAL FAMILY VALUES!


-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Jared Dahl             | "My heart is human, my blood is boiling, | 
| Systems Programmer     |  my brain IBM"                           |
| IBM - Rochester, MN    |              -- STYX,  "Mr. Roboto"      |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Opinions expressed are mine, not IBM's.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: narsi@sgi.com
Subject: another quayle quote
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 18:07:01 GMT


In last night's "Prime Time Live" show, they had a short bit about
Danee's "talking" style -
a while back, when asked what he thought of the new supreme court,
he said:
"They are all lawyers . . . they are judges . . . and they are appointed
for life . . ."
all the time having that uncomfortable look on his face - the one that
shows that his brain is not in sync with his mouth.

I don't remember seeing this in the Quayle quotes list.

We have to excuse him though - the question was impromptu - and there
were no handlers etc.


-----
narsi


P.S. BTW, MQ (as usual) complained that Gore does not get similar treatment
- even though, as she put it,
" (Gore made) gaffe after gaffe after gaffe . .  ."
when asked to give examples, she said he used wrong dates for the Civil War
etc. - maybe it's time for alt.fan.al-gore :-) or even better
alt.fan.bitch-n-whine.m-quayle :-) :-)

P.P.S. i know this is alt.fan.dan-quyle, but can someone post grades etc.
for all - Clinton, Clinton, Gore and Bush.
(I heard that Hillary was/is a brilliant student/attorney - Bill and Al
were known to be bright students - what about Bush? - okay, i'll be fair,
what about Babs Bush?)


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: browns@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Stuart Brown)
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 22:51:29 GMT

In article <s6i9PB1w165w@fennec.sccsi.com> popec@fennec.sccsi.com (William C. Barwell) writes:
>Well, it looks like Bush 'n' Quayle's Convention Bounce has piddled away 
>to nearly zilch, and I think the boys are going down the crapper.  The 
>election is a little over two months away.  


>And when Bush 'n' Danny go down to defeat, I think i am going to consider
>throwing a big old "Thank Gawd They're Finally Out Of Here" party!
>Bye Bye Danny! Bye Bye Bush!  Bye Bye Babs, the silver Bag!  Bye Bye 
>Marylin!  Time for a party and to fumigate the Whitehouse!
>
>----------------

Wow!  I didn't even think of this.  The last party I went to on election night
was in 1980.  Everyone I knew spent the night in the Graveyard alternately 
howling at the moon and singing along with the local radio station which played
the song "It's my party and I'll cry if I want to" continuously for 24 hours.

Why, I might be the only person in Winnipeg, Manitoba who truly understands the
need for a huge celebration on the eve of the defeat of the Danster and Bushman.
And the best part is that we don't have to deal with the unmitigated mediocrity
of Clinton 'till January.

	You are all invited!!!

-Stu

-- 
Stuart M. Brown                             If you can remain cool when all 
U. of Manitoba, Dept. Plant Science         Around you are in panic,
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA
browns@ccu.umanitoba.ca            Then you surely misunderstand the situation
From: DSTEPHEN@cmsa.gmr.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle gets it wrong again
Date: 31 Aug 92 15:10:35 GMT
Organization: GM Research Labs

In article <BtunDr.8y1@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>
shallit@graceland.uwaterloo.ca (Jeffrey Shallit) writes:
>
>Somebody should tell Dan about the Honda Civic VX hatchback,
>which gets 72 mpg on the highway, 52 mpg in the city.
>

I certainly don't want to start a thread on this, but my listing of the 1992
EPA results is that the Honda Civic with 1.5 liter 4 cyld. engine gets 55 mpg
HI/ 48 CI.  Is the model you mention sold in the US?  Many highly efficient
Asian and European cars aren't sold in the US because they don't meet crash or
emissions standards (e. g., the Honda "Lean Burn" NOX generator).

I hate to agree with Quayle, but I think raising the CAFE is attacking the
wrong end of the problem.  If you want to reduce gas consumption, raise the
gasoline tax.  Actually I bet our boy is against this as well, so I'm in the
clear.

While I'm at it, I also think (a) sending harassing E-mail to Tucker Quayle is
just fine (e.g. "How did your sister's abortion go?"), (b) that Bush and Quayle
will still win the election, and (c) that it's not important to VOTE for
Clinton and Gore to get the current idiots out.  As far as I'm concerned
they're all turds out of the same toilet.  By all means vote, but only take
local stuff like the school board, property tax, etc. seriously.  For
president vote for the bottom name on the ballot (like I do) or write in daffy
duck.  The "major" party's two candidates are functionally equivalent, and to
maintain the farce that there is a choice is damaging to the long-range
interests of the country.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: ronnie@cisco.com (Ronnie B. Kon)
Subject: Re: Tucker's e-mail
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message are those of an
	      individual at SRI International, and do not necessarily
	      reflect those of the company.
Organization: cisco Systems, Incorporated
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 18:47:19 GMT

In article <13576.2aa2d4bd@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>, vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:

|> Seriously, leave him alone. Imagine being a freshman all over again, with
|> 12 ZZ agents babysitting you 24 hours a day. It would suck, and seriously
|> interfere with trying to have a normal college experience. I kinda feel
|> sorry for the kid...

Attending Lehigh University seriously interferes with having a normal college
experience.  And I feel sorry for any kid with a birth defect, even if there is
no telethon yet to help find a cure for Republicans.

				Ronnie

PS.  Don't bug Tucker.  (sort of the new a.f.dq slogan)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ronnie B. Kon           | "Boy, they were big on crematoriums, weren't they?"
ronnie@cisco.com        |
(415) 688-4592          |           -- George Bush at Auschwitz, Sept 1989
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: shafer@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (Mary Shafer OFA)
Subject: Re: "I can even forgive Bush for Dan Quayle, but not for this."
Organization: NASA Ames Res. Ctr. Mtn Vw CA 94035
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 21:15:47 GMT

bsmart@bsmart.TTI.COM (Bob Smart) writes:

>In article <Z26DqB6w164w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us>,
>elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>> Had he wanted to really show he cared for the people of FL and LA,
>> he would have shown up in Miami riding in a C-5A loaded with supplies rather
>> than Air Force One.

>Said C-5A would then have been...Air Force One.  I'm reasonably certain
>that ANY aircraft (or maybe any military aircraft?) which happens to
>have the President aboard is called "Air Force One." As I understand it,
>it's not a specific airplane, it's more like a commercial airline's
>"flight number."

Only Air Force planes would be "Air Force One".  For the other
services, the callsign would be "Navy One", "Marine One", and "Army
One", respectively.

The Vice President's plane is "Air Force/Navy/Marine/Army Two" by the
way.

--
Mary Shafer  DoD #0362  NASA Ames Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, CA
         shafer@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov shafer@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov
                     Of course I don't speak for NASA

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: neeri@iis.ethz.ch (Matthias Neeracher)
Subject: Re: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Organization: Integrated Systems Laboratory, ETH, Zurich
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 11:35:06 GMT

In article <BiuBqB4w164w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>Along with many others here, I've been giving some thought to the demise of
>this group.  I think we need to practice the politics of inclusion on this, and
>come up with an alt.fan group that will include not only Our Boy, but other
>politicians and preachers (if one can tell the difference anymore in the GOP)
>who are worthy of admiration, ridicule, scorn, etc.  Possibilities:
>
>alt.fan.stupid-pols
>alt.fan.radical-right
>alt.fan.gop-crazies

How about:

alt.fan.family-values                For critique of the radical right
alt.fan.politically-correct          For critique of the radical left

Matthias

-----
Matthias Neeracher                                      neeri@iis.ethz.ch
   "I think I should tell you that I am enjoying my involuntary
    retirement, and I know and hope that President Bush will share
    the same pleasure after January." -- Jimmy Carter

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bsmart@bsmart.TTI.COM (Bob Smart)
Subject: Re: family values
Reply-To: bsmart@bsmart.TTI.COM (Bob Smart)
Organization: Citicorp+TTI
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 02:06:52 GMT

You figured it out.  If you have enough money for a big church wedding,
you by definition have "proper family values."

---------

A fanatic is someone who does what he knows that God would do if God knew the
facts of the case.

Some mailers apparently munge my address; you might have to use
bsmart@bsmart.tti.com -- or if that fails, fall back to
72027.3210@compuserve.com.  Ain't UNIX grand?
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dan's a Democrat (sorry, wrong key)
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 10:57:39 CDT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS, New Orleans, LA

unrzc7@daphne.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (THOMAS LUBANSKI) writes:

>
> After watching this newsgroup for quite some time, I do have a really nasty
> suspicion. Dan can't possibly be a Republican, he has to be some kind of
> brilliantly planted Democrat spy, helping Clinton/Gore to win this year's
> election. I mean - if Dannyboy is a complete idiot, nobody would have
> elected him (or that man who chose him as his VP). You wouldn't have,
> wouldn't you?
> Danny is really clever, posing as an idiot and damaging the Republicans
> with the things he says. (But I still don't get it why they choose him to be
> George's Robin again - surely somebody must have noticed Danny's not helping
> the GOP)
>
> Seriously, even though I'm a bit away from the US, the mere thought of Bush/
> Quayl rerunning for the next four years makes my stomach turn. So please
> vote. VOTE!!!! And do it for Clinton/Gore. I really don't know these two
> guys, but there's no way that they are worse than Bush/Quayl.
>
> A concerned German
> Thomas
>
> "What would Janna say about it?"
>
>

Thomas, this same accusation was made of George 'Rubbers' Bush back in '88.
After Bush beat Dole in New Hampshire, lots of folks figured that this wimpy
flip-flopper had to be a Democratic plant.

The moral of that story is that these slimeballs have an amazing way of falling
into the biggest pile of crap and coming up winners.  The numbers say they're
not going to do it this time, but that's no reason for anyone to let down their
guard...



|Edward J. Branley                         elendil@mintir.New-Orleans.LA.US|
|Seashell Software                                UUCP:  rex!mintir!elendil|
|3508 North Woodlawn Avenue                          Compu$erve: 71237,2227|
|Metairie, LA   70006       voice: +1-504-455-5087     bbs: +1-504-455-8665|
From: sandya@hpfcmdd.fc.hp.com (Sandy A)
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 00:15:21 GMT
Subject: Re: Vegetable Illiteracy
Organization: HP Mechanical Design Division
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle

Well, I'm willing to bet that whoever wrote that sign isn't
a heartbeat away from the presidency...
From: afc@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Some rough comparisons
Date: 27 Aug 92 14:57:17 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle

In article <17fe1vINN5ge@agate.berkeley.edu>, mazzarel@spam.berkeley.edu (Ariel Mazzarelli) writes:
> 
> Quayle managed to graduate from De Pauw University with a GPA of 2.16. 
                                                                   ^^^^
> On a 4 point scale.  He served in the National Guard,  which was considered
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^    

Just another indication that Danny is a middle-of-the-road kind of guy
(unlike 4.0 radical extremist curve busters like Clinton and Gore).

> 
> Ariel

A.F. Cockburn
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams)
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 12:57:10 GMT
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

From article <1992Sep1.225656.1526@nuchat.sccsi.com>, by lcypher@nuchat.sccsi.com (Louis Cypher):
>>Mind you... if they do lose (which I doubt... *sigh*) do you realise we're
>>going to have a VP arguably more intelligent than the president? Maybe we can
>>start an alt.fan.tipper. That should be fun.
>>
>>anthony (not an american, and glad)
>>--
>>Anthony Hobbs             the Bard                hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz    
> Well...latest poll results disagree with you.....
> 
> Clinton - 56%
> 
> Bush    - 36%
> 
> Leaving Clinton with a 20 point lead....
> 

The election is Clinton's to lose.  The Bush campaign will finally
find which button to push in the collective consciousness, and then
if Clinton doesn't come up with the proper response, he'll be toast.

Most americans seem to watch the election the way they bet on a boxing
match, and vote for the guy they think is going to be left standing.
Unfortunately that means we end up with a guy governing who's taken a
few hard shots to the head.

A lot of people will vote for Bush just because he's demonstrably a
worst son of a bitch than Clinton.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle