From: bufalini@among.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Subject: Re: Bruce Bufalini's daily routine (was Re: The Politics of USENET)
X-Roger-Taylor-Quote: Don't get into religion, it tends to fuck people up.
Summary: Biff likes OGGLEs
X-Backmasking-Message: steliot sevol ylleK kciR
X-Advertisement: Buy a Honda.
Keywords: Patrick needs to get into religion.
X-Bruce-Bufalini-Quote: Better to get laid than laid off.
X-Political-Statement: K e n   R o b i n s o n for President in 2032.
Reply-To: bufalini@among.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
X-Whoosh: WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH WHOOSH
Organization: Pep$i $tate Univer$ity
X-Subliminal-Message: IBM 370 assembler sucks big time.
X-Oggle: OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE OGGLE
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 92 06:42:08 GMT

In article <1992Jul26.052911.3068@rice.edu>, patrick@is.rice.edu (Old enough to be informed) writes:
>In article <5w81Hhn7p8@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@among.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
>>In article <1992Jul25.062838.2772@rice.edu>, patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>>>In article <e!31Hfido8@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini) writes:
>>>>In article <1992Jul24.051323.22097@rice.edu>, patrick@is.rice.edu (One group at a time, please.) writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't communicate with imaginary entities.
>>>>
>>>>Nor do I.  You still have not gathered any facts, Patrick.  I do not talk to
>>>>imaginary entities, for DOI is not imaginary.
>>>
>>>Sure, Bruce.  Can you prove that?  No?  So much for you, then.
>>
>>I don't have to prove that it exists.  You have to prove that it does not
>>exist, which you have so far failed to do.  Congratulations.
>
>Sorry, weenie -- you made the assertion, you get to prove it.  Not that I'd
>believe you even in the unlikely event you *could* prove it...

I told it to you before: 478 East Beaver Avenue, State College, PA, 16801 is
DOI's location.  Point proven.

>>>>>Ask me if I care.  (Since you were so utterly clueless, I'll give you a hint
>>>>>-- it's a famous island in the greater Houston area.)
>>>>
>>>>You apparently cared enough to lie about DOI, relating it to islands in the
>>>>pits of hell.
>>>
>>>It's not my fault if you don't know any of the local dialect.  Funny that
>>>your precious (and imaginary) "DOI" couldn't inform you of that.
>>
>>Who gives a freaking shit about your local dialect?  The Department of
>>Information need not inform individuals about irrelevant drivel in the Pits of
>>Hell.
>
>No one down here gives a damn about your neck of the woods, either -- and
>there are about 40 times as many folks down here to ignore you as there are
>up there ignoring us.  Thanks, once again, for demonstrating conclusively
>that you have no earthly idea of what you babble about...

At least we are much higher on the intellect level than you folks at Rice
University are.  Communication with DOI @ 478 E. Beaver Ave. seems to help the
local residents.

>>>>>>It's my idea, and you are my test population.  I am the only eligible voter,
>>>>>>and I vote that you go directly to jail.  Do not pass GO, do not collect $200.
>>>>>>It looks like you're going to be in jail for quite a while.  Congratulations,
>>>>>>Patrick, for it appears that this idea is a quite successful one.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sorry, your voter registration was discovered to be invalid due to incorrect
>>>>>information.  Turn yourself in for voter fraud at the nearest of your DOI
>>>>>offices.
>>>>
>>>>Wrong, for I am informed of everything.  You are still going to jail, Patrick,
>>>>so get ready for it.
>>>
>>>Sure, Bruce.  I'm going to jail like your DOI really exists.  Enjoy your
>>>fantasy.
>>
>>What fantasy?  DOI does exist; therefore, you are going to jail, as I asserted
>>before.
>
>Imaginary entities still don't exist, so they're not putting me in jail --
>you assert, but you can't prove.  Like I said, ask me if I care about your
>fantasy...

But you are going to jail.  You seem to be quite misinformed, for DOI has been
proven to exist.

>>>>>Maybe that's all you have to do in your daily routine.
>>>>
>>>>Wrong, asshole.  Observe:
>>>>
>>>
>>>I was wrong, I see.  You have nothing whatsoever in your daily routine,
>>>apparently.
>>
>>Yes, you are always wrong.  You are also illiterate, for you were apparently
>>incapable of understanding what I posted.  Now let's see your daily routine,
>>Mr. Humphrey.
>
>When hell freezes over.  My daily routine is none of your business.

Probably because you do nothing all day.  Can we say "Lazy Ass," boys and
girls?

>>>Are you sure you're alive?  :-)
>>
>>I must say I appear to be quite alive. :-)
>
>Great proof -- of course, someone with access to the right password could do
>all that...anyway, your brain sure doesn't appear to be among the living.
>Now, let's hear some more of your famous lobotomized-parrot responses...

No, no one possesses my password.  Perhaps you would care to prove otherwise.
My brain has always been among the living, while yours appears to be
indefinitely out for repairs.

>     "Can't have everything.  Where would you put it?" -- Steven Wright

No brain for Patrick... no place to put it.

-- 
Bruce A. Bufalini (bufalini@gis.psu.edu)  |   In the Basement Bars,
PSU Geographic Information Systems        |   In the Backs of Cars,
                                          |   Be Cool or Be Cast Out.
                                          |
                                          |     -Neil Peart, 1982