HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Via: uk.ac.leeds.scs; Thu, 10 Dec 1992 13:29:26 +0000
Distribution: world
X-News-Gateway: NewsGateway@phaze.UUCP (NewsGateway 1.0 by Pierre Rioux)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 92 13:29:06 GMT
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Organization: The University of Leeds, School of Computer Studies
From: ross-c@scs.leeds.ac.uk
To: usenet@phaze.cam.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Notes on "I Need You" (INY)

In article <1992Dec9.050643.6200@g2syd.genasys.com.au> you write:
>In article <Byx78w.6H7@world.std.com> awp@world.std.com (Alan W Pollack) writes:
>>
>>                         ===============================
>>                        || Notes on "I Need You" (INY) ||
>>                         ===============================
>
>Who in the hell reads this crap???
>
>If an Email message takes more than one screen to make its point, 90% (or 
>more) of potential recipients will turn off.

Even if what you say about 90% of people turning off was true, that would
still leave thousands of people reading it.

If you don't want to read it, don't. Put the subject "Notes on" in your
kill file. The last thing we want in a newsgroup that services tens of
thousands is individuals flaming things they don't like. 

There'd be nothing left but the flames.

Cheers,

Ross-c
From: krovetz@canberra.cs.umass.edu (Bob Krovetz)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Really bizarre GET BACK take
Date: 19 Dec 92 18:36:38 GMT
Reply-To: krovetz@cs.umass.edu (Bob Krovetz)
Followup-To: rec.music.beatles
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

In article <1gj34fINN7pb@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cq019@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Preston Landers) writes:
>
>	The original title of the song was "Don't Dig No Pakistanis" 
>about Britian's immigration policy.
>

What were some of the other alternative titles to Beatles's songs?
I know that "Yesterday" was originally "Scrambled Eggs".  Also, what
about alternative lyrics?  For example, Ringo mentioned that one of 
the lines in "With a Little Help From My Friends" was "would you
throw tomatoes at me".  

Bob

krovetz@cs.umass.edu


Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: "headly westerfield" <headly.westerfield@canrem.com>
Subject: copied message
Reply-To: "headly westerfield" <headly.westerfield@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 14 Dec 92 17:48:23 EST

From: UPI                             Read: (N/A)
Subj: bc-people:1225pes             Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
Conf: UPI-B-OTHER (2439)         Read Type: GENERAL (A) (+)

bc-people:1225pes
UPI-ID:724094997
People

                             By ANDRA VARIN
                       United Press International

   BEATLES REUNION: The three surviving Beatles will reunite for a TV
documentary about the group's history - and they may also collaborate on
some music for the project. Paul McCartney says he will work with Ringo
Starr and George Harrison on a 10-part television series called ``The
Long and Winding Road,'' and that could mean some new Beatles songs.
``We're getting together for this thing...and there is a chance that we
might actually do a little bit of music for it,'' McCartney, 50, told
the British Broadcasting Corp. ``It'll probably just be the three of us.
'' The Beatles last played together as a group in 1970. Each has pursued
separate careers since then, although Harrison and Starr have often
played together. John Lennon's murder in 1980 put an end to hopes the
four Liverpudlian stars would ever get together again.
                                 ---------
                           upi 12-11-92 12:28 pes
>>>=====Headly=Westerfield===>
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: cq019@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Preston Landers)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Beatles promo films
Date: 13 Dec 1992 23:29:19 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: cq019@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Preston Landers)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, maujs@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J D Morris) says:

>	Another question for all you Beatle experts out there. Which
>	songs did the Beatles make promotional films for? The only
>	ones I've seen are:
>
>	Strawberry Fields Forever
>	Penny Lane
>	Hey Jude
>	Revolution
>	+ clips taken from Beatle films i.e. Magical Mystery Tour.
>				thanks in advance...
>						...Jonathan Morris
>


	I think "Paperback Writer" and "Let it Be" both have promo films.

-- 
----------
Preston Landers
planders@maria.wustl.edu
----------
From: st1qp@Jane.UH.EDU (Matthew Tighe)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Harrison/McCartney
Date: 14 Dec 1992 09:39:11 GMT
Organization: University of Houston
Reply-To: st1qp@Jane.UH.EDU
NNTP-Posting-Host: jane.uh.edu

Well, I've always wondered what a Harrison/McCartney tune would sound like,
myself. But I'm really looking forward to that documentary more than anything
else.  Harrison spoke about it on ROCKLINE a couple months ago.

Of course, Harrison also said he wanted to work Tom Petty more, not Paul
McCartney, so I don't know how much faith I'd put in the recent news reports.

-Matt Tighe
From: edc@evolution.bchs.uh.edu (edward s. chen)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Beatles to reform????
Date: 14 Dec 1992 16:33:34 GMT
Organization: Little to none, or maybe not......
NNTP-Posting-Host: evolution.bchs.uh.edu

In article <1ghkcjINNarm@menudo.uh.edu> st1qp@Jane.UH.EDU writes:
>In article <1992Dec12.190440.709@leland.Stanford.EDU>, raindrop@leland.Stanford.EDU (Nathaniel Michael Pearson) writes:
>>In article <1992Dec12.103413.2466@dct.ac.uk> mcsdc1gsf@dct.ac.uk writes:
>>>Just to let you know that next year(1993), Paul wishes to perform with the rest  
>>>of the band for a one off gig. This will be the first time that they have
>>>played together since spliting up back in 1977.
>>>
>>	Are you referring to the session (I assume it was an informal one)
>>	held by Paul, George, and Ringo at Eric Clapton's wedding in the
>>	late seventies?  Does anyone know anything about this? What a band to
>>	have at your wedding!...I wonder if they played polkas...
>>
>>	P.S.  It's seems ironic (and sad) that John wasn't there.
>
>I thought it was John, George, and Ringo that played at the reception (George
>played at the wedding, too), but I could be wrong about that.  I do remember
>reading one tale about it though.  Apparently Eric, when The Beatles were
>winding down, said "I can't believe no one is taping this".
>They were reportedly really bad, though.

Nope, it was Paul, George, and Ringo, along with multitudes of other
rock and roll ghods and demi-ghods on stage jamming at the reception.
You are probably thinking of the song "I'm The Greatest" (from the _Ringo_
album), which does feature JGR.   The other well known "three-former-Beatles
on-one-song" is of course "All Those Years Ago".

As to the quality of the wedding jam, it depends upon who you believe.  No
tape exists to verify how good or not-good it was.  Most comments I've read
about it were of the variety "It was wonderful playing on the same stage as
X"  (where X could be Macca, George, Ringo, Clapton, etc...)  However, in
_Blackbird_ (by Geoffery Guiliano) JoJo Laine calls the jam some of the worst
music she'd ever heard.  But then again, most of that book is in the 
relentlessly negative mode.  However you want to believe, you must remember
that the alcohol was flowing quite freely, so in all likelihood *NO ONE*
remembers the quality of the jam.

<ESC>


-- 
Something in the way she moves, attracts me like a pomegranate.
                                     -- George Harrison
From: st1qp@Jane.UH.EDU (Matthew Tighe)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Beatles to reform????
Date: 14 Dec 1992 09:33:07 GMT
Organization: University of Houston
Reply-To: st1qp@Jane.UH.EDU
NNTP-Posting-Host: jane.uh.edu

In article <1992Dec12.190440.709@leland.Stanford.EDU>, raindrop@leland.Stanford.EDU (Nathaniel Michael Pearson) writes:
>In article <1992Dec12.103413.2466@dct.ac.uk> mcsdc1gsf@dct.ac.uk writes:
>>Just to let you know that next year(1993), Paul wishes to perform with the rest  
>>of the band for a one off gig. This will be the first time that they have
>>played together since spliting up back in 1977.
>>
>	Are you referring to the session (I assume it was an informal one)
>	held by Paul, George, and Ringo at Eric Clapton's wedding in the
>	late seventies?  Does anyone know anything about this? What a band to
>	have at your wedding!...I wonder if they played polkas...
>
>				Nat Pearson
>				raindrop@leland.stanford.edu
>
>	P.S.  It's seems ironic (and sad) that John wasn't there.

I thought it was John, George, and Ringo that played at the reception (George
played at the wedding, too), but I could be wrong about that.  I do remember
reading one tale about it though.  Apparently Eric, when The Beatles were
winding down, said "I can't believe no one is taping this".
They were reportedly really bad, though.

Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: mdubey@MtHolyoke.edu (Mandakini Dubey)
Subject: insanity
Organization: Mount Holyoke College
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 22:19:01 GMT


I just rediscovered "You know my name (look up the number)" after a gap and
wanted to register my love for it, officially. 

		It's the greatest song ever made.

(In my not-so-humble opinion!)


Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: a70901@uwasa.fi (Mikko Suhonen)
Subject: Re: Christmas CD Spotted
Organization: University of Vaasa, Finland
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 10:29:57 GMT

In article <1gnvbtINNo36@menudo.uh.edu> edc@evolution.bchs.uh.edu (edward s. chen) writes:
>A counterfeit version of "The Beatles Christmas Album" has been released
>on CD.  Both the front and back covers duplicate the British release
>(ie: not the "cubes" cover familar to Americans) -- with the exception
>of a typo (possibly intentional).   The original front cover had 1964-era
>pictures of the Beatles, with the phrase "From Them to You".   On the CD,
>the phrase (in a completely different font) now reads "From Then to You".
>
>Didn't purcahase it, so no comments on sound quality.
>
>Incidentally, I saw the CD for $20.00, so it is probably being sold to
>retailers for $10.00 - $15.00.   (As you would expect, since this material
>is fairly common on vinyl)
>
>That is all.
>
><ESC>
>-- 
>Something in the way she moves, attracts me like a pomegranate.
>                                     -- George Harrison

Has anyone seen the Christmas CD in Europe?

-- 
Mikko Suhonen
Vaasa, Finland
(a70901@chyde.uwasa.fi)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Beatles to reform????
From: mcsdc1gsf@dct.ac.uk
Date: 12 Dec 92 10:34:12 GMT
Organization: Dundee Institute of Technology

Just to let you know that next year(1993), Paul wishes to perform with the rest  
of the band for a one off gig. This will be the first time that they have
played together since spliting up back in 1977.

Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: mcodogno@nyx.cs.du.edu (Maurizio Codogno)
Subject: Re: The Lives of JL
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 13:22:34 GMT

In article <1992Dec10.192754.2410@dct.ac.uk> mcsdc1al@dct.ac.uk writes:
>    On another topic, I think Goldman's apraisals of the music of The Beatles
>and Lennon's solo work is exemplary.  He is one of the few writers I've ever
>seen who display how little John really contributed to "Sgt Pepper" and also
>how it was John who drove them to split up by insisting that "Get Back" would
>be recorded live, without overdubs etc.

Well, it's surely true that John did not have a great part in the 
Sgt Pepper's project. But I always thought that the "no overdubs" idea
was Paul's. Wasn't him who tried to persuade the other to do unannounced
gigs, so that they could feel the live excitement again?
 
And by yhe way I don't think that the _Get Back_ idea was one of
the major causes of Beatles' dissolution :-)
--
ciao! .mau.
-----
Maurizio Codogno - CSELT UF/DU dept. - Torino Italy
"home" email: mau@beatles.cselt.stet.it
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: mdubey@MtHolyoke.edu (Mandakini Dubey)
Subject: Re: NO, THEY'RE *NOT* REFORMING!
Organization: Mount Holyoke College
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 23:10:32 GMT

Thanks for the response to the thingy I posted -- if I knew how to edit with
a pico, if that is what it is called, I would: but since I don't, I won't :(
 Instead, I shall ramble on blithely.

I was just wondering, who are the well-placed sources from inside "Paul's
camp" (has he taken to playing Cowboys & Indians again in his dotage? ;)
Just kidding) who say that he is desperate for a hit single? And how do
you know that they aren't Freddy Seaman-like goons? 

Please don't get me wrong, I'm not mindless about this man (Macca), and I
*did* read Saki's post with loving care. However, I just find that it all
fits too quickly into the cliche of politician Paul. My problem, always, is
with the fact that these images build up around people whom we don't actually
know, and then we start ascribing motives to them. For all you know, he's
a great old guy who is actually, genuinely excited about working with his old
mates. For all you know, he's a heartless bastard who plans his every move
with the ulterior motive of getting that hit single, making money, etc.
Either way we will never really know. Therefore, I subscribe to the belief
that we should butt out of their personalities, or their "masks", and just
enjoy the music.

I hope I don't sound rude, since that would be most unfortunate: I
probably sound more vehement than I mean to. Sorry! Write back, everyone.
From: edc@franklin.bchs.uh.edu (edward s. chen)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Beatles to reform????
Date: 18 Dec 1992 16:55:17 GMT
Organization: Little to none, or maybe not......
NNTP-Posting-Host: franklin.bchs.uh.edu

In article <1992Dec18.101246.11@condor> waltersm@logica.co.uk writes:
>In article <BzBJME.Ev6@mtholyoke.edu>, mdubey@MtHolyoke.edu (Mandakini Dubey) writes:
>> 
>Is there some confusion between Clapton's wedding and George's 2nd marriage
>(by which I might mean Ringo's - not able to recall the dates, locations etc)
>in the early 80's?  I remember `reviews' of George's (or Ringo's) marriage
>saying there was a big jam/singalong sessions afterwards.
>

George's wedding to Olivia was a private affair.

Paul and George *were* at Ringo's marriage to Barbara Bach, but
no music was played.

<ESC>


-- 
Something in the way she moves, attracts me like a pomegranate.
                                     -- George Harrison
From: bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Brian Harvey)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Seventies Pop lyrics quiz
Date: 15 Dec 1992 23:37:10 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.cs.berkeley.edu


Boy, I know *one* of those.

I guess I'm getting old.  :-(
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: bml@netcom.com (Brian Leibowitz)
Subject: Re: Christmas CD Spotted
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 23:37:12 GMT

I saw the Xmas CD about 2 years ago (I'm not sure which cover I saw)  One thing
I liked in the copy I saw was that it gave a listing of what was in each track.
My vinyl copy is unbanded and just says which years are on each side.  They
didn't even bother to put a gap between years.
I wasn't going to pay $30 just to get the listing from the insert.
Does anyone have an on line detailed listing of the contents of the Xmas
album that they could e-mail to me?  I'd love to have a copy.

Brian Leibowitz   bml@netcom.com
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: jbmorris@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (jeffrey brent morris)
Subject: Re: Harrison/McCartney
Keywords: Paul, George
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 14:12:50 GMT

Of course, there is one known McCartney-Harrison tune in existance:
"In Spite of All Danger", the B-side to their very first record,
"That'll Be the Day".  I've never heard this, nor heard of it being
heard by anyone!  But I do remember some band at one of the Liverpool
conventions was going to play it one time - how did they know it?
Has anyone ever heard "In Spite of All Danger"?  Also, as far as I
know, only just over a minute of "That'll Be the Day" has really been
heard.
I did hear that Paul had this original 78 digitally remastered and
distributed 50 copies to friends as Christmas presents a couple of
years back.  I don't know if this was both sides, or just the A.
Anyone know?
Why are we being denied these recordings?  Well, many others, too,
for that matter.  Let me post elsewhere on that...

- Jeff ("I woke up late this morning..." - Paul)




Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: dmac@julia.math.ucla.edu (saki)
Subject: Re: Chronology
Organization: UCLA Mathematics Department
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 18:03:25 GMT

In article <5830@npg-sd.SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM> rns@npg-sd.SanDiegoCA.NCR.COM (Rick Schubert) writes:
>In <1992Dec12.003835.7641@math.ucla.edu> dmac@julia.math.ucla.edu (saki) writes:
>
>>Censoring songs isn't new. Some hits of the sixties were either recorded
>>in two versions or relooped in studio to produce less offensive versions;
>>viz., "Stagger Lee"....
>
>I thought the sixties were 1961-1970.  Now you're including 1958 or at
>least 1959.  Good!  Now we can call our proposed group rec.music.sixties,
>and I can include the music that I'd like! :-)

Fine by me. :-) I had in fact forgotten the release date of "Stagger Lee",
which I thought was 1960.

>You're recollection of the events is better than your recollection of the
>dates and chronology.  "Lightnin' Strikes" first charted 12/25/65, while
>"Rhapsody In The Rain" didn't chart until 3/26/66... unless 
>"Rhapsody" was released first but censored/banned until after "Lightnin'"
>broke some ground.

I like to think that my sense of history is fairly intact, though it
plays tricks on me occasionally. And I don't carry a copy of Whitburn
upon my person every day, either. But I'll bet my mono "Sgt. Pepper"
(or equivalent) that "Rhapsody" was released first (there's a lyrical
reference to "lightning" at one point---and pray spare me from the
need to explicate its imagery :-) ---which plays neatly into follow-up
lyrics in the subsequent song wherein "lightning strikes *again*". So
to speak.

Maybe "Rhapsody" didn't chart first because of a ban, and a subsequent
rerelease was arranged. I'm afraid this is one we'll have to check out
with the label, to make absolutely sure. 

At least I never make mistakes with Beatles information. :-)

--
"Some of these tunes are purely instrumental, such as 'Looking Glass',
'Catswalk' and 'Winston's Walk', and others were composed with the modern
audience in mind, tunes like 'Thinking of Linking', 'The One After 909'...."
---------------------------------------------------saki (dmac@math.ucla.edu)
From: dube@hardy.u.washington.edu (Ric Dube)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Paul Unplugged 2
Date: 12 Dec 92 00:54:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Dec12.005415.10062
Organization: University of Washington

Got the scoop from a woman on Prodigy who won tickets to the dress
rehearsal Thursday night.  The show's scheduled to air Feb 3.  Here's the
set list:

Twenty flight rock
Get out of my way
Fixing a hole
Looking for changes
Penny Lane
Biker liker icon
I owe it all to you
Big boys bickering
Michelle
Jingle Bells
Hope of deliverance
Can't buy me love
Peace to the neighborhood
Off the ground
I wanna be your man
Sgt Pepper
My love
C Moon
Lady Madonna
Come on people
Live and let die

She didn't say, but with this set list I'm guessing the show was Plugged.


_________________________________________________________________________
Mary
(please send e-mail to m_mclaughlin@unhh.unh.edu and not the address I'm
posting under)
Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan
From: georger@utoday.com (George Rothe)
Subject: Re: Talkin' Bob Dylan
Organization: UNIX Today!
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 22:35:46 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.153850.1896@uvaarpa.Virginia.EDU> alan@atmos.umd.edu writes:
>Who's the guy who did "Talkin' Bob Dylan" on his new History album?
>
is that the name of the song by Loudon Wainwright III ?



Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan
From: dcblack@eos.ncsu.edu (DORWIN CLAY BLACK)
Subject: Re: Mississippi John Hurt
Originator: dcblack@c00321-2114bl.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: dcblack@eos.ncsu.edu (DORWIN CLAY BLACK)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:31:32 GMT


  RE The Fra Fra Tribesmen "Yarum Praise Song" on the album "Story of 
     the Blues", 
  This is not an early blues band but a group of singers from a tribe in Africa.  
I doubt you will find any other recordings by them, unless its in the 
Smithsonian Institute.  I believe that the reason the cut was included on the 
album was to give an idea of the African antecedents to the Blues which 
developed in America.
	
	-Dorwin
	 NCSU
From: david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright)
Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan
Subject: Re: Don't Look Back (WAS Re: GAIBTY poll)
Date: 12 Dec 92 02:16:26 GMT
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu


In article <Bz3s3I.Btq@news.iastate.edu> reiners@iastate.edu writes:
|In article <1g9nlaINNcka@darkstar.UCSC.EDU| david@cats.ucsc.edu (David 
|Wright) writes:
||
||In article <1992Dec11.051742.27389@cs.sfu.ca| khattra@cs.sfu.ca (Taj
||Khattra) writes:
|||pgwfranc@atlas.cs.upei.ca (Wayne Francis) writes:
|||| ...
||||   By the way, Don't Look Back was shown in the first of two parts on
||||CBC Newsworld (the Canadian version of CNN) on their arts special last
||||Saturday night at 8:00 pm EST. The second half will be this Saturday
||||same time, same station.
|||| ...
|||
|||After they show the second half there will also be an interview 
|||with the guy (Pennebaker (sp?)) who shot the film.
||
||This film was rather a strange experience for me. Dylan seemed to be
||much more stupid and tormented than his songs seem to indicate.
|
|If by "stupid" you mean not intelligent, then I disagree; to me he seemed 
|razor-sharp and extremely arrogant in the film.  On the other hand, if you 
|meant that he was acting like a cruel jerk, then I agree.

I agree that he was arrogant, and had a sharp wit. But I was rather
noting the difference of feeling I get when reading or listening to
his songs and seeing him on the film. His convey the impression that
he cares and thinks a great deal about his fellow man, that he is
mature, reasonable, but can still be humerous and funny. The film
showed him to be, in your own words, like a cruel jerk, and he acted
rather like a spoiled child than an intellectual. Perhaps this was
simply the interpretation of the director.
-- 
"There is nothing in the marginal conditions that     
    distinguish a mountain from a mole hill"            
                      Kenneth Boulding                             

					All comments  are mine---(David Wright) 
						david@cats.ucsc.edu.
Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan
From: alan@atmos.umd.edu (Alan Robock)
Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan
Subject: Perfect last-minute gift: Himmelman CD
Date: 21 Dec 92 01:15:58 GMT
Reply-To: alan@atmos.umd.edu
Organization: The Internet

Looking for that perfect last minute gift for your favorite Dylan fan?
Look no farther than FLOWN THIS ACID WORLD by Peter Himmelman, Bob's son-in-law.
I get nothing from this, but just wanted to share with you my new discovery.
This guy is great, and anyone that likes Bob will like him.  While he does not
have Dylan's gift for words (who does?), he is great at song-writing, singing,
rocke guitar, acoustic guitar, piano, and harmonica.  I saw a concert
of his in San Francisco a month ago and was blown away.  After you become a
fan you will want to get his first album, FROM STRENGTH TO STRENGTH.
He is very personable in concert, joking around with the audience and even
inviting members up on stage to dance and sing with him on one number.

SEASON'S GREETINGS, AND PEACE,

Alan Robock
Newsgroups: rec.music.dylan