From: chuck@mtechca.maintech.com
Newsgroups: co.general
Subject: Educate the ignorant!
Date: 8 Jan 93 22:59:30 PST
Followup-To: co.general,nyx.misc 
Organization: MAINTECH, A division of Volt Delta Resources,Inc. Orange, CA.

In article <1993Jan8.124334.15059@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, kschwab@nyx.cs.du.edu (Kerry Schwab) writes:
> ***Wild newsgroup distribution left intact, but I did set followups
>    to co.general***
> 
> In article <1993Jan8.003732.10002@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> zstewart@nyx.cs.du.edu (Zhahai Stewart) writes:
>>>>>Someplace that didn't have a constitutional amendment stripping gays,
>>>>>lesbians, and bisexuals of their civil rights?
>>>>
>>>> Or how about a place where its not acceptable to grant special
>>>>treatment and priviledges to certain groups of individuals.
>>>
>>>Don't try to be logical with radicals. It's obvious they'd rather have
>>>seperate legislation for *each* and *every* group that could possibly be 
>>>discriminated against.
>>>
>>>I'm anxiously awaiting the "Humpback Asthmatic Lesbians" equality act..
>>
>>Funny.  "a place where its not acceptable to grant special treatement and
>>privileges to certain groups of individuals" doesn't exist in the US.  Every
>>state and the federal government grant special rights to heterosexuals, which
>>are unavailable to homosexuals (ref: marriage).  No state nor the federal
>>government grants any rights to homosexuals that are not evenly granted to
>>heterosexuals (including Colorado's cities with non-discrimination ordinances).
>>So he was just being snide and ignorant of fact.  You consider that "being
>>logical".  Sigh.
> 
> 
> Check the article you quoted. You are assuming that I wrote *all* of it.
> I wrote the above lines preceded by  ">>", the lines preceded by ">>>"
> were quoted by me, written by someone else.
> 
> By saying logical, I was expressing my disdain for excessive legislation. 
>>
>>Meanwhile, you invent what "radicals" would rather do as a strawman of your own
>>imagination.  Your attempt at sarcasm falls as flat as your logic.  Have you
>>actually read, say, the Denver and Boulder ordinances?  Naw, that would be too
>>factual for a "logical" mind like yours.  You would rather sneer at parodies
>>which only you think insightful.
>>
>>You might find the reality refreshing, if your fantasies aren't too fulfilling.
>>
> 
> My "invention" of what "radicals" would rather do was sarcasm, and 
> an exaggeration of the end result of individualized legislation.
> I have not read the actual ordinances, but feel free to post them if
> you think they would be enlightening(sp).  I have read summaries, and
> do not think they make my arguements moot.
> 
> I didn't see the second part of post my post disputed by you. Can I assume
> you agree, or is it just that sarcasm pisses you off?
> 
  I'm sure it's the sarcasm that "pisses this individual off"!  A good rule
  of thumb for people like this is to remember the age old proverb.......
  "Fuck Em, Feed Em Fish Heads!"
  It intrigues me that many of the networld supporters of the "Boycott" are
  posting from various universities.  Could it be that these newly educated
  primadonas have such little grasp of the "real world" that they can not
  begin to see the ramifications of special interest legislation on the
  plite of state and national economies?!  What the hell, let's force all
  employers throughout the nation to hire individuals, give performance 
  reviews, issue pay raises, etc. based on interest group, and quota rating.
  Forget the poor fuck who simply works his or her ass off....that's not
  important.

  It's best for the wise to forget this arguement.  Our children in the 
  universities must have a game to play and a passtime to occupy their
  obviously copious spare time.  Carry on children...argue and learn!
> Kerry Schwab
> kschwab@nyx.cs.du.edu
-- 
-- chuck
-----------------OPINIONS ARE MINE...ALL MINE...LIKE EM or NOT!----------------
| Chuck G.                                                                    |
| GO BRONCOS!!!!!!
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| NO TIME FOR A CONSCIENCE,                     e-mail: chuck@mtechca.uucp    |
| AND WE RECOGNIZE NO CRIME.                            mtechca!chuck@wdt.com |
| YEAH, WE GOT DOGS AND VALVOLINE,                                            |
| IT'S A PRETTY DAMN GOOD TIME!                                               |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------