HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: muir@convex.com (David Muir)
Subject: Re: When DR scams, it's ok? Was Re: Win3.1/DR DOS 6.0/SuperS...
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 15:57:37 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <11320@mindlink.bc.ca> Robert_Salesas@mindlink.bc.ca (Robert Salesas) writes:

>> David E. Watson writes:
>> 
>> 
>> I found out that the version of SuperStor that comes with DR-DOS was crippled
>> to only work with DR-DOS.  The SuperStor driver will not recongnize another
>> operating system.  This was confirmed by tech support at AddStor (the
>> people who make SuperStor).  Now I had recently upgraded my version of
>> SuperStor to v.2.0 through AddStor.  According to AddStor, this
>> version will recongnize MS-DOS.
>> 
>> 
>> --David
>> --
>> 
>> ***********************************(+)**************************************
>>  David Watson      Internet: dew@Turing.acs.Virginia.EDU      (804)295-6736
>>  Pony Express: 2111 Michie Drive #77, Charlottesville, Virginia  22901-2872
>> ***********************************(-)**************************************
>> 


>Interesting.  I hope MS bashers take note.  While all the claims that MS
>"cheats" by placing code to check for OS/2 or DR-DOS, have been unfounded, DR
>plainly admits that it limits components of it's DOS to only work with itself.
>How many people are going to condem DR for doing that?  How many would if it
>was MS who did that?

>Rob

>--
>\--------------------------------------------------------------------/
>\ Robert Salesas             + Usenet: Robert_Salesas@MINDLINK.bc.ca /
>\ Eschalon Development Inc.  + CIS:    76625,1320    BYTE:  newdawn  /
>\--------------------------------------------------------------------/

I fail to see the point of these postings.  The SuperStor that is supplied with
DR DOS is a utility supplied with the system.  It is not sold seperately by
by DR DOS to be used with other operating systems.  So I do not see what
everyone thinks Digital Reserch is doing wrong.  

Not a Microsoft Basher, Just curious

-----------------------------------
These are my opions.  If any one else would like to use them, that's ok by
me.
* Dave *
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Best win3.1 upgrade strategy with NDW
From: tim@qed.cts.com (Tim Capps)
Date: 12 Apr 92 03:20:14 GMT
Organization: The QED BBS, Lakewood CA
Keywords: win3.1 & NDW

ulisses@ldgo.columbia.edu (ulisses mello) writes:

> However, I want a painless upgrade (like everyone else). What would be
> the best upgrade strategy to keep the groups intact, use NDW as file manager
> and program manager and install win3.1 from the scratch ? I wouldn't like
> to spend hours reconfiguring everything again.

Here's what I did:

Install 3.1 using the 'custom' install option.  Pretty much let it do what
it wanted (except touch my AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS files, of course,
as them's fightin' words).  I told it NOT to scan for applications.

When I got to the point where you re-start windows, I did so.  NDW came
right up.  The only thing I had to do is to re-specify the printer setup
for the printer icon on the desktop.  It kept disappearing on me.

Just for fun, I went through all the MS provided icons in my NDW group
windows, and changed the ICON with 'Properties'.  I just told it to load
the icon from the program file, and it picked up the new spiffier MS icons.

That was it .. no hassle at all.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Capps     | tim@qed.cts.com  or qed!tim  |  NOTE: New e-mail address
QED Software  | The QED BBS (310)420-9327    |  Give The QED BBS a call!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: ddulay@jarthur.claremont.edu (Dan Dulay)
Subject: Re: Trident New Drivers?
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Distribution: comp
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 17:26:53 GMT

In article <12297@tamsun.tamu.edu> packman@tamuts.tamu.edu (Wally Strzelec) writes:
>In article <1992Apr11.154342.11642@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> hzh@vax5.cit.cornell.edu writes:
>>I am using Trident 8900 super vga card with Windows 3.0 without any problems.
>>But recently I switched to Win 3.1 and I can't use my 256 color drivers
>>anymore.  Do I need a new driver from Trident?  I tried calling Trident BBS.
>
>On their BBS, they have a new driver for Win 3.1.  It is in the beta
>library and takes about 25 min at 2400 baud.  I was able to get
>through twice *early* Saturday morning.
>
>
>	Wally Strzelec
>	Texas A&M University
>	Unix System Administrator    
>	packman@tamuts.tamu.edu
>
>
>

Would someone please post these drivers to wurchive?
Thanks in advance

							DDulay


Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn)
Subject: Re: Why go to 3.1 if 2.0 works
Organization: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 19:34:13 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.175441.17203@ncsu.edu> linville@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (John W. Linville) writes:
/>In article <1992Apr13.171421.17859@alw.nih.gov> donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn) writes:
/>>But what about the fact that Microsoft and Borland have sold more Window's
/>>development packages (SDK, C++ for Windows, Visual Basic, Turbo Pascal for
/>>Windows, QuickC for Windows etc...) than there are copies of OS/2 (all
/>>versions) in use.
/>
/>But what about the fact that all of these packages still only produce 16-bit 
/>code that runs in an unprotected, non-preemptive environment?
/>
/>John W. Linville
/>
While it is true that they produce only 16-bit code, I don't think, at this
time, this is a bad thing.  At least the apps that are created using them
can be used on the installed base of over 40 million AT class machines out
there.  32-bit applications can "NOW" be written for Windows just as they
can for OS/2.  However, unless the particular program runs substantially 
better as a 32-bit application than a 16-bit application, it would be utterly 
stupid for anyone to only make a 32-bit version.  32-bit is the future, but
from a practical commercial standpoint, its still a few years off.

--
Donald A. Lehn, Ph.D.                      Phone: (301) 496-2885
Bldg.37 Rm 3D20                            FAX:   (301) 496-8419
National Cancer Institute / NIH            Email: donnel@helix.nih.gov
Bethesda MD 20892
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: Iskandar Taib <ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: WinQVTnet for Token Ring??
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 20:39:38 -0500

In article <167C48243.IANR009@UNLVM.UNL.EDU> IANR009@UNLVM.UNL.EDU writes:

>Is there a way to get winqvtnet to use a token ring network (a special
>version or driver?)?  Any help on this topic would be appreciated.  Thanks
>in advance.


I'm pretty darned sure that a token ring driver exists in the 
Clarkson Packet Driver set. Checking lan_stuff.ucs.indiana.edu
in /dos/packetd there is indeed one called ibmtoken.com.

Just get yourself a copy of this and follow the instructions.


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iskandar Taib                          | The only thing worse than Peach ala
Internet: NTAIB@SILVER.UCS.INDIANA.EDU |    Frog is Frog ala Peach
Bitnet:   NTAIB@IUBACS                 !
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: jeffery sumler <jsumler@silver.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: advice wanted on sound boards
Organization: Indiana University
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 12:32:10 -0500

Well, I've had quite a bit of fun playing with .wav files, making my
pc say "I'll be back" about 10,000 times, and making "He's dead Jim"
the default message for critical errors. But this $.29 speaker in my
pc has got to go . . . so it's time to spring for a sound board. I'm
looking for recommendations regarding Sound Blaster, Sound Blaster Pro
and Thunderboard. Opinions and stories welcome, hard facts most
appreciated. I'm leaning toward the Sound Blaster Pro, which seems to
offer the most bang for the buck, but I could be wrong . . . .
Thanks

Jeffery Sumler
---
Internet: jsumler@silver.ucs.indiana.edu
Bitnet  : jsumler@iubacs.bitnet

Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: paschall@utdallas.edu (Dwayne Paschall)
Subject: Re: Boo Hiss MicroSoft
Keywords: Marketing Scam
Organization: Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 22:14:23 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.150425.9590@cs.mcgill.ca>, becap@cs.mcgill.ca (Brian CAPSON) writes:
|> In article <j8h2b9o@dragon.wpd.sgi.com> daveb@merlin.wpd.sgi.com (Dave Babcock) writes:
|> >Well my copy of Windows 3.1 didn't arrive on Monday by 10am as promised.
|> >
|> >I know that my $8.50 shipping doesn't cover the full shipping cost and that
|> >the upgrade order form only promised 4 - 6 weeks delivery.  But when I placed
|> >the order I was told it was "guaranteed to be delivered by 10am Monday 4/6".
|> >
|> >My gripe is that MicroSoft made a big deal and got a lot of free press on
|> >the "All pre-ordered upgrades will arrive by 10am Monday" announcement.
|> >
|> >It was a lie.
|> >
|> 
|> You poor fellow. I and everyone that I know who ordered upgrades got
|> them on Monday as scheduled. Mine came at 8:30 AM (to my chagrin at the
|> time). I know this doesn't mean much to you, but I think your case is
|> the exception rather than the rule.
|> 
|> - Brian
|> 
|> 
Brian,
  I hate to tell you, but he's not the ONLY one. It's Wed. afternoon and I 
STILL haven't received mine yet either. This is true also for another 
friend of mine. IMHO, this is just another example of MS making grand claims 
which they niether are able or indended to COMPLETELY follow through with.


-Dwayne
From: Mike_Quigley@mindlink.bc.ca (Mike Quigley)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Visual Problems?
Date: 9 Apr 92 22:23:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: mindlink.11346
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada

Is this the forum for the visually impaired or something? Despite the message
at the bottom of my postings, I got back three letters which quoted the entire
text of my very long ramblings about Win 3.1 this morni. I really CAN remember
what I said, y'know...
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're going to reply in E-mail, please don't quote my whole message back to me -- it costs me money!!! (so does this extra line)
Mike Quigley, Vancouver, B.C., Canada             Mike_Quigley@mindlink.bc.ca
From: gettys@regent.enet.dec.com (Bob Gettys)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Boo Hiss MicroSoft
Keywords: Marketing Scam
Date: 9 Apr 92 17:07:06 GMT
Reply-To: gettys@regent.enet.dec.com (Bob Gettys)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


In article <1992Apr9.020043.23246@unixg.ubc.ca>, twong@civil.ubc.ca (Thomas Wong) writes:
|>Path: e2big.mko.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!mips!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!ubc-cs!unixg.ubc.ca!twong
|>From: twong@civil.ubc.ca (Thomas Wong)
|>Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
|>Subject: Re: Boo Hiss MicroSoft
|>Keywords: Marketing Scam
|>Message-ID: <1992Apr9.020043.23246@unixg.ubc.ca>
|>Date: 9 Apr 92 02:00:43 GMT
|>References: <j8h2b9o@dragon.wpd.sgi.com>
|>Sender: news@unixg.ubc.ca (Usenet News Maintenance)
|>Organization: Dept. of Civil Engineering, U.B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
|>Lines: 16
|>Nntp-Posting-Host: sam.civil.ubc.ca
|>
|>Say. I thought Microsoft made a BIG DEAL about having shipped millions
|>of copies weeks ahead but told FedEx/dealers to hold it so that they
|>will be sitt'n there and be able to be released exactly on THE day
|>they said they'd release it. To make a big intro, a BIG release right
|>on Monday. Oh well, I guess it's just another Microsoft lie again.
|>



	Well, I got mine on Tuesday, after FEDEX tried to deliver it to an empty house, I went down to the local depot and picked it up. (Luckily I live only about 2 miles away!) The package said tuesday delivery! The fellow at FEDEX said that there was no attempt to get those packages out specifically on monday although a large number did go out monday, it meant that those packages were actually delivered quicker than FEDEX and MicroSoft agreed. 

	The funny thing about all this - FEDEX was out to my house TWICE on monday with two different packages, one from Symantec, and one from Microsoft with another product!

	BTW - the tuesday delivery attempt was at 3:15 in the afternoon and the class of delivery that Microsoft paid for was for delivery by the end of the day tuesday assuming delivery was possible (i.e. someone had to be there to accept and sign for the package).

	/s/	Bob Gettys
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Win 3.1 and SMARTDRV
From: furlong@mdcbbs.com (Carey Furlong)
Date: 9 Apr 92 09:49:50 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: M&E (Division of EDS), Cypress CA
Nntp-Posting-User: sanders

In article <1992Apr8.135832.1420@unixland.natick.ma.us>, scott@unixland.natick.ma.us (Scott Evernden) writes:
> In article <1033@mavrick.UUCP> luis@mavrick.UUCP (luis basto) writes:
>>
>>Windows 3.1 replaced the old SMARTDRV.SYS with SMARTDRV.EXE which seems
>>to have more control on setting up a disk cache. However, when I run
>>CORETEST v2.8, the read/write speed is almost an order of magnitude slower
>>than when using the simpler SMARTDRV.SYS, almost to the point of having no 
>>disk cache.
> 
> YES!!
> 
> In my tests using both CORETEST and SI, my disk speed were identical
> with and without SMARDRV 4.0.   Some disk cache...
> 
> Windows operates much worse without SMARTDRV.
> 
> This is really annoying.  My latest suspicion, knowing Microsoft, is
> that it kills SMARDRV when it sees QEMM386 as the mem manager, so my
> next test will be to try without QEMM.
> 
> This is only one of several surprises w/ 3.1
> 
   Have you tried enabling 32 bit access? By default it is turned off,
   but on most 386s it should be on. Windows 3.1 was slow for me too 
   until I enabled 32 bit access. Now Windows is a screamer.
-
                             "Excellent Kassim. You have served me well"
                             ---------- Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves ---
       ---- Carey ----
    Carey Furlong, Huntington Beach, CA; Compu$erve 70531,2753;
    Prodigy TXST34A
From: jdr8@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Jay D Rosenbaum)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Win 3.1 and Cache Programs
Date: 9 Apr 92 20:02:31 GMT
Reply-To: jdr8@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Jay D Rosenbaum)
Organization: Columbia University

Is it necessary to use the new Smartdrive with Win 3.1, or will other, and
perhaps old versions, of other Cache programs work?  For instance, I use an
older version of PC-Kwik, and would like to continue to do so if possible.
Is it?

Thanks for your help...

-Jay
jdr8@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
From: john.will@satalink.com (John Will)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: RE: WIN 3.1 AND SMARTDRV
Date: 9 Apr 92 17:55:00 GMT
Reply-To: john.will@satalink.com (John Will)
Organization: Satalink Info Systems - Huntingdon Valley, PA - 215-364-3324

TO: scott@unixland.natick.ma.us
SE.This is really annoying.  My latest suspicion, knowing Microsoft, is
  .that it kills SMARDRV when it sees QEMM386 as the mem manager, so my
  .next test will be to try without QEMM.

Well... You could do what I do.  I've lost SMARTDRV and dropped back to
HYPERDISK v4.31, it's faster and thrashes the disk a lot less than the
new SMARTDRV, and has run better than the SMARTDRV.EXE.  I had several
crashes with the new SMARTDRV, so it's back to HYPERDISK for me.
---
 . KingQWK 1.05 . (D)inner not ready:  (A)bort (R)etry (P)izza
From: chaolin@fcit-m1.fcit.monash.edu.au (LIM CHAO LIN)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Window -> OS/2 cost in OZ
Date: 13 Apr 92 01:14:48 GMT
Organization: Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Monash University


While people in U.S. are talking about US$49 from Window to OS/2, the 
price from IBM (Australia) is A$174.  Lucky to be in U.S.



Chaolin
From: cchapman@matd.gatech.edu (Charles H. Chapman)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: NLINK.EXE anyone?
Date: 10 Apr 92 12:15:12 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <1992Apr9.114549.54334@cc.usu.edu> fahole@cc.usu.edu writes:

>Does anyone know where NLINK.EXE can be found?
>I downloaded the novell.exe file from the microsoft BBS and NLINK is not
>in the file.  Win 3.1 requires that I update my ipx.com file and provides
>this nifty utility to do it with one catch, you have to have NLINK.exe.
>I assumed that it was a Novell product since MS did not include it but a
>phone call to Novell determined that it is a MS product.
>It doesn't show up in the users guide index, or on any diskettes that I can
>tell.  I can't update my IPX.com without it and can only run in standard mode
>with my old ipx.
>Any suggestions appreciated.

Not knowing anything about Novell, this may be an off the wall suggestion but
the PC speaker driver I downloaded from the Microsoft BBS was a self ex-
tracting zip file named SPEAK.EXE.  I ran SPEAK.EXE to extract all the files
that made up the speaker driver package.  Try running NOVELL.EXE and see if
the files you need pop out.


Chuck


Charles H. Chapman  (GTRI/MATD)             (404) 528-7588
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:     ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,ut-ngp}!gatech!matd!cchapman
Internet: cchapman@matd.gatech.edu
From: Renee@cup.portal.com (Renee Linda Roberts)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: CICA is back online!
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 14:06:41 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world

Try this location:
	ftp.cica.indiana.edu	129.79.20.84

Renee Roberts
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Ami Pro problems under 3.1
From: stefan@olson.acme.gen.nz (Stefan Olson)
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 13:53:35   Y

lisbon@vpnet.chi.il.us (Gerry Swetsky) writes:

>     I confirmed this, but don't consider it serious.  I'll send E-mail
>     to Lotus to support your finding.

What is the email address of lotus??  I'd like to meil them as well...

Thanks,
Stefan


------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Stefan Olson                     Mail: stefan@olson.acme.gen.nz
   Kindness in giving creates love.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: NDW 2.0
From: stefan@olson.acme.gen.nz (Stefan Olson)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 19:50:55   Y

fahole@cc.usu.edu writes:

> In article <eVV4iB3w164w@olson.acme.gen.nz>, stefan@olson.acme.gen.nz (Stefan
> > Microsoft if you are reading this: Has Excel 4 changed the file format??
> 
> Yes, the file format has changed in Excel 4.0

Thanks..  Does Norton release new viewer for such things??

Thanks,
Stefan

------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Stefan Olson                     Mail: stefan@olson.acme.gen.nz
   Kindness in giving creates love.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: centaur@terminus.gatech.edu (Anthony G. Francis)
Subject: Windows Bugs: Threat AND Menace!
Organization: Georgia Tech College of Computing
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 18:01:31 GMT

First, the Threat:
Windows 3.1 is ... was ... running just fine. Then I got the Windows
Resource Kit from Cica, and tried to run one of the files ... and it
ran smack dab into Norton Desktop for Windows virus checker. I'm not
even sure now what file I tried to run (or even if it was actually 
part of those WRK files) because the two warring programs promptly
trashed COMMAND.COM and crashed windows. Of course, since my A: drive
is down, I am out a computer for now ...

Now, the Menace:
Why can't I run any Soundblaster games in DOS windows? Some sound driver
conflict kills Eye of the Beholder, both I and ][. I mean, I had to load
EOB ][ from a floppy _before_, because it conflicted with _something_
in my system, but now neither program will run with Soundblaster sound.
Is there no solution for the sound-driver blues?

-Anthony


--
Anthony G. Francis, Jr.  - Georgia Tech {Atl.,GA 30332}
Internet Mail Address: 	 - centaur@cc.gatech.edu
UUCP Address:		 - ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,ut-ngp}!gatech!prism!gt4864b
-------------------------------Quote of the post------------------------------ 
"Cerebus doesn't love you ... Cerebus just wants all your money" 
		- Cerebus the Aardvark, from a _Church and State_ T-shirt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: beldar@MicroUnity.Com (Gardner Cohen)
Subject: Problems with winqvt/net 2.3 lpr
Reply-To: beldar@MicroUnity.com
Organization: MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
Date: 10 Apr 92 09:42:50

Hi, we're running winqvt/net 2.3 and having problems with the lpr
function.

I've verified that we can telnet and ftp to the various print hosts we
try, but no matter what we do, attempts to print immediately fail with
a failure to open connection dialog box.

We have both the host and ip address of the PC in /etc/hosts.lpd, and
/etc/hosts.equiv.  The print requests fail immediately when trying to
connect to any of the following:

sparcstation 2, sunos 4.1.1, stock lpd
mips magnum 3000, risc/os 4.52, stock /bsd43/bin/lpd
HP 9000/730, hpux 8.05, stock rlpdaemon.

The latter case at least demonstrated that winqvt/net was actually
trying to open a connection, because hpux starts rlpdaemon (their
mutated version of lpd) via inetd, and I could see the print request
spawn a daemon.

I even tried building PLP (lpd replacement) on the sun.  With
debugging enabled, I could see that a connection was made to the
daemon, but it rejected the information supplied.  I have PLP
configured to allow anyone/anyhost to print to any printer.

Any suggestions?  I saw a previous response to a similar problem
suggesting adding a line with the ip address and host name to one's
.rhosts file.  We tried that, with no success.

Is there any way to contact the authors besides US mail?

Thanks in advance for any assistance.
From: scls_ss@troi.cc.rochester.edu (Eric Scoles)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: DRDOS 6.0 and WIN 3.1
Date: 13 Apr 92 06:43:12 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <57299@cup.portal.com> ts@cup.portal.com (Tim W Smith) writes:


>If you take as the standard of DOS compatibility MS-DOS 3.3, then in
>some areas DR-DOS is more DOS compatible than MS-DOS 5.0 is.

>							Tim Smith

Is this why 4DOS 4.0 views DR DOS 6.0 as "MS-DOS 3.3" ?
--
Eric Scoles			:	-----------------------------
scls_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu  :	joe:  A Civilized Unix Editor,
--------------------------------:	      for Civilized People
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.ibm.pc.misc,sci.astro,sci.edu,sci.space
From: ebergman@isis.cs.du.edu (Eric Bergman-Terrell)
Subject: Astronomy Lab for MS Windows 3.X
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 06:37:04 GMT

Astronomy Lab is the most versatile and comprehensive astronomy program for
Microsoft Windows 3.X.  If you would like to receive a uuencoded .zip file
containing this shareware program, please send me e-mail.  The file is about
400k.

Eric Bergman-Terrell
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms