HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Re: Holiday Bowl (Illinois or MSU)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:56:37 GMT

In article <1eeie1INNaiq@agate.berkeley.edu> clarko@liszt.berkeley.edu (Clark Olson) writes:
>In article <steph.722125364@pegasus.cs.uiuc.edu> steph@pegasus.cs.uiuc.edu (Dale Stephenson) writes:
> 
>>According to the Tribune, Wisconsin is the #2 Freedom bowl choice, behind
>>Utah.  Utah would have to beat BYU to go, which only happens in years
>>ending with '8'.  :->  So the Big 10 could send five teams this year.
>
>The worst thing about this travesty is that Iowa signing with the Copper
>Bowl likely took away any chance Washington State (currently 7-3) has of
>going to a bowl game.
>
>It looks like one of the worst conferences (Big-10) will have at least as
>many bowl teams (4 maybe 5) as the best (Pac-10) which will now have only
>Washington, USC, Arizona, and Stanford in bowl games.

	You would think that a bowl like the Copper would want a potential
	drawing card like Drew Bledsoe, especially since WSU beat Arizona
	this year.  It's obviously money.  Lots of Iowa folks will be bailing
	out of the Hawkeye State for the warm climate of Tucson.  $$$$$$$$$$

-- 
-------------------------------
| Randy Peppler               |
| Illinois State Water Survey |
| peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu    |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: stassen@alc.com (Chris Stassen)
Subject: Re: Michigan - National Championship - Not with Moeller
Organization: The Lion's Den, San Jose
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 00:39:16 GMT

Someone else says:
] You *really* better check the facts, pal.  The Rose Bowl is one of the
] highest ranked games on January 1.

William P. Jones responds:
> The 1989 Rose Bowl was clobbered by the ND - West Virgina Fiesta Bowl.

It looks a mite suspicious to me that William only has one four-year-old
data point to support his cause -- which was stated as the general case.
--
Chris Stassen			408-943-0630			stassen@alc.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com (David Head)
Subject: Re: Miami scheduling again
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:08:51 GMT
Reply-To: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne  FL


> Speaking of such things.  Which poll takes precedence the AP or the
> Coaches?  In one Fla St. is #3 in the other AM is.  Assuming Bama loses


From what I read in the paper, the Bowl Coalition will use the AP poll to
decide pairings for the bowls.  Seems kind of wierd to take sportswriters'
judgment over coaches, but hey, being a Nole, I can't complain about FSU
being ranked higher in the bowl deciding poll!  GO NOLES!!

D. Head
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: zcjm0f@wwnv45.uucp (CJohn Mace)
Subject: Re: AP make FSU #3
Keywords: n
Organization: Amoco Production
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:57:53 GMT


In article <Qf1qDIS00WAwQjY0p_@andrew.cmu.edu> wm1o+@andrew.cmu.edu (William Karamo Motley) writes:
>In an article <BxsoAu.GMs@encore.com> jfawcett@encore.com (Jason
>Fawcett) writes:
>
>>AP
>>
>>1. Miami
>>2. Alabama
>>3. FSU
>>4. Texas A&M
>>
>>FSU jumps over Texas A&M, with a blow out with Tulane.
>>
>>Well the polls MO POINTS rule raises it's ugly head again.  With FSU >and
>>Bama both playing Florida, it will be a shootout for MO POINTS. The >most
>>POINTS could get the #2 spot. Both Bama and FSU will be taken out the
>
>At least the "HEY I'M UNDEFEATED I DESERVE IT" rule didn't rear it's
>head again.  TAMU has had the shittiest schedule out of the top five
>atleast.  I mean, almost everyone in the PAC-10(I'm not a PAC-10 fan,
>just giving credit where credit is due) has had a better schedule than
>A&M. What legitimate squad has A&M beaten to claim that #3 spot???? 
>Hopefully the USA TODAY/CNN poll will have FSU at #2 ahead of Alabama
>and TAMU.  Alabama also has had a shit schedule and they have not played
>anyone worth mentioning to claim that #2 spot.  Their toughest opponent
>was Tennessee.  FSU barely lost to Miami on Miami's home field and has
>rolled over everyone else they played, whereas BAMA just got by
>Mississippi State, who's not even ranked!  Arizona's schedule has been
>tougher than Alabama's and TAMU's crap schedules combined!
>
>Will

Apparently, your skull is pretty thick, and you don't understand all 
of the ramifications of the above.  
1) NO ONE knows if a team is underrated or overrated vs another team, 
     until they meet on the field.
2) The way it USED to work is that undefeated teams moved up the polls
     until they lost, or (if by some mere chance they were overrated)
     they get to get crushed on NYD.

With FSU going by A&M in the polls, a major precedent is being said
  by the pollsters:

They have taken it upon themselves to choose who is the better team, and
it could turn into a major travesty.  How you ask?  Ok, Alabama loses a
game, and FSU goes to #2 and A&M goes to #3.  Miami and FSU decide on
the rematch in the Fiesta Bowl.  A&M goes on to win the Cotton Bowl.
Instant controversy over the polling system..  not that this hasn't been
true in the past...

If A&M is not going to win the MNC, I would prefer to lose it on the 
playing field, not some pollster who looks at final scores only.  Besides,

FSU BLEW THEIR CHANCE TO BEAT THE CANES, AGAIN. GIVE SOMEONE ELSE A 
CHANCE!


Remember everyone saying Nebraska and Michigan were better teams, not
10 days ago...  Why?  Because they were blowing ppl out...  I will take
consistency over that stuff anyday.

Lets pitch the polls and get a real playoff... Maybe invite everyone 
with 8 wins over Div IA teams, and make the brackets according to how
many teams get 8 wins.

cmuck
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: crobbins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Chris S. Robbins)
Subject: Re: Texas 35 SMU 14
Keywords: nnn
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:45:50 GMT

In article (CJohn Mace) writes:

>then explain why UNT was on your schedule still contained Arkansas?
>Remember the year they almost beat you?
>
>cmuck <- I like ribbing these guys...  pretty soon he will start
>         talking about the good ole days..  :-)

To be real honest, I don't know.  Yes, I do rembember the time UNT almost
beat us Kerry(I think)Cash caught a last minute TD pass that should of
been out of bounds.
Regarding our schedule, yes, UNT is a dumb game to play.  However, you
take away that game and I feel that our non-conference opponents are all
high caliber.
I rembember reading somewhere a list of the top 25(?) teams according
to schedule strength and Texas was ranked 5th this year, even with the
UNT game.



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dames@cs.uiuc.edu (Raymond Dames)
Subject: Re: Go U Northwestern!
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 18:35:48 GMT

fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Eric West) writes:

>At the beginning of the Big Ten season, I heard plenty of predictions
>giving Northwestern 9th or 10th place.

>Well, the Big Ten season is over, and Northwestern is tied for 6th with
>Indiana, Wisconsin, and Purdue, being awarded 7th in tie-breakers, or at
>least MY system (2-1 record among 4 teams beating Purdue and Wisconsin at
>1-2, losing to Indiana on head-to-head).

not to mention a competitive performance against Stanford.

>We were also 1 point (and a missed field goal) away from being tied for
>4th, being awarded 5th (losing to Iowa, "beating" Michigan State).

although that 1 pt. comeback victory over Illinois still has Illini fans
shaking their heads wondering what might have been (not to mention the 1 pt.
comback loss to Minnesota).  in the big ten this year, what comes around does
indeed go around.

>Northwestern has won 3 Big Ten games for the first time since 1973.  New
>coach Gary Barnett has done an excellent job changing the attitudes of the
>players and of most of the fans.  In the coming years, the team can only
>get better.  I realize this has been an off-year (or maybe off-decade) for
>the Big Ten, but don't expect Northwestern to slip back down to the bottom
>of the conference.  I applaud Michigan, Ohio State, and Illinois for
>somehow surviving and making the bowls, and I applaud Northwestern for
>giving me the most exciting football season I have ever witnessed.

i applaud nu as well, but please stop beating my illini.

						
						Ray Dames
						dames@cs.uiuc.edu
From: melo@gluck.cs.unc.edu (Roberto Melo)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Torretta vs. Graves
Date: 16 Nov 92 22:00:26 GMT

Comments about the Syracuse vs. Miami game this saturday.....

Go Oragemen nail those 'Canes in the Dome.


 _______________________   >>>Roberto M. Melo.<<<
[ RRRR   M     M  M     M\ ________________________________________
[ RRRR   MM   MM  MM   MM |Syracuse University CoOp Program       ]
[ RR RR  MMM MMM  MMM MMM |Computer Engineering Department        ]
[ RRRR   MMM MMM  MMM MMM |---------------------------------------]
[ RRRR   M M M M  M M M M |I miss 'cuse's friends and football,   ]
[ RR R   M MMM M  M MMM M |but still I enjoy UNC and VR!          ]
[ RR RR  M  M  M  M  M  M |                     ---ROB.           ]
\------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: Roll Tide down the Polls!
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 12:46:56 GMT

In article <dkm2.721885020@Isis.MsState.Edu>, dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K. Magee) writes:
> dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K. Magee) writes:
> 
> First- I apologize to those I may have offended. I blew my top.  I should 
> have the cool hand like others and bite my tounge.  
.
.
.
> David - You were right about the woof gods!

Never anger the Woof Gods (tm) my son.  Their wrath is swift and terrible!

With that in mind, I predict:

bama    128
Auburn  -63

('da tide)

-- 
David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@accs.duc.auburn.edu 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: exby@pogo.Colorado.EDU (|J| Exby)
Subject: Re: fichigan fumbles
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:06:02 GMT

ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:

>   >c'mon buckeys, do it to em next.  fichigan blows.
>   >::j

>Don't listen to him, people.  He's just an anti-Michigan stooge.
>Exby's anti-Michigan sentiments are well-know on the net, so take
>anything he posts about Michigan with a truckload of salt.  That'll
>make the truckload of bullshit taste better.

no son, I say ya got it all wrong.  being anti-michigan mean you
aint a stooge ya see?  It's all of you who worship bo scumbechler
and repeat the SAME fight song over-and-over ad nauseum at games
that defines the word "stooge".

>-Alan Harder

::j

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com (David Head)
Subject: Re: Possible #1 vs. #2 matchup in major bo
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:59:31 GMT
Reply-To: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne  FL


[stuff deleted]

>Why in the world would Miami play FSU again?  They already beat them.
>Now I know this will bring out cries of "chicken" from the FSU crowd,
>but really, what does Miami have to gain from a rematch?  How could
>they be accused of ducking FSU?  They already played them, AND WON...

If Miami ends up #1 and FSU ends up #2, they are mandated to play for the
national title by the Bowl Coalition as I understand it.  The only way Miami
could duck FSU is to decline to go to a bowl at all, which would be ludicrous.
So a Miami/FSU rematch is a possibility.  Of course FSU has to get by the
Gators in Tallahassee, who have far less to lose in the game than FSU since
Florida would be able to get into the Sugar Bowl whether they beat FSU or
not.  FSU has 2 weeks to prepare for Florida while Florida must think 
about Vanderbilt this week (they dare not lose to Vandy to keep SEC hopes
alive).  It will be interesting to see if my beloved Noles' revived offense
can score on a better defense than Maryland or Tulane.  FSU may win close
or they may win big, but either way, I think they will win over the Gators.
GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!!  GO NOLES!! 

D. Head
From: n9041679@henson.cc.wwu.edu (brian h. harper)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Hypothetical Pac-10 Rose Bowl bid
Date: 20 Nov 92 22:34:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: henson.1992Nov20.223452.2623
Organization: Western Washington University

george@ssdt-tempe.sps.mot.com (Binay George) writes:

>Can anyone enlighten me on what would happen if

>Washington was 6-2 - lost to Washington State & won against USC
>Washington State was 6-2 - lost to USC and won against Washington
>USC was 6-2 - lost to Washington and won against Washington State

>Who would go to the Rose Bowl?

It would be between WSU and USC, and depend on their other loss, I believe.
Washington would not go because it went last year, and so loses in the event
od a tie. Can't actually imagine these three teams in this situation,
though. The Huskies will go again to Pasadena this year, and look out for
Arizona next year!

-Brian Harper

>Thanks.

>Binay
From: morse@cs.unc.edu (Bryan Morse)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: AP make FSU #3
Date: 16 Nov 92 17:30:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: borg.17579

In article <BxsoAu.GMs@encore.com>, jfawcett@encore.com (Jason Fawcett) writes:
|> AP
|> 1. Miami
|> 2. Alabama
|> 3. FSU
|> 4. Texas A&M
|> 
|> FSU jumps over Texas A&M, with a blow out with Tulane.

A&M drops below FSU after yet-another-miserable-but-victorious-game-
against-a-SWC-opponent (YAMBVGASO).

 [ranting about MO POINTS omitted]

I'll acknowledge that MO POINTS it a problem.  What makes it a problem
is the way many voters simply look at the final score and vote based
on that alone.  Many never see the games in question.  (This also
seems to apply to r.s.f.c flamers who spew out a lot of junk just
from what they saw in the "Scores" section of their Sunday paper.)

Unfortunately, voters seeing the game is what probably hurt A&M.
They played in a highly-visible Thursday night game and a lot of 
people (voters) got to see them.   Add to that the large amount of 
press devoted to SMU's big win over Houston the week before.
Texas A&M did *not* look like a #3 team against Houston and they
moved down accordingly (at least in the AP poll--CNN still has them
ahead.)

Now, if this had been a Saturday afternoon game with perhaps only
regional coverage...

-- 
Bryan Morse                University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
morse@cs.unc.edu           Department of Computer Science
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mbs@zycor.lgc.com (Matt Shostak)
Subject: Re: Showboating etc. (Was: Re: Verbal Bashing Of Miami)
Organization: Landmark/Zycor   Austin, Texas
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:44:14 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.155948.14348@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick E Fleming) writes:
>Matt Shostak writes:
>
>>I realize that football is an extremely emotional game and that some
>>celebration is appropriate, but it seems to me that it is getting out of
>>hand.  Are there fans who actually enjoy this sort of thing?  (Are they
>>the same ones who like astroturf and domed stadiums?)
>
>A picture from this weekend which will stick in my mind for a while was the 
>celebration by a Miami (Fla) receiver in the endzone (complete with back flip 
>causing me to wonder if he paractices palying the game as much as he practices 
>his touchdown dance) following a ruling by the official that the pass was 
>trapped.  As sson as the Hurricane's dance was over, the Temple defender did a 
>back flip in ridicule of the overly exhuberant Hurricane.
>

I saw that!  Talk about hilarious! 


-- 
Matthew B. Shostak              Landmark/Zycor
mbs@zycor.lgc.com               (512) 292-2357
"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the war room!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado)
Subject: Re: AP make FSU #3
Organization: Florida State University Computing Center
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 22:19:18 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.200429.12910@tamsun.tamu.edu> x0y3510@tamuts.tamu.edu (Xuejun Yang) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.184647.13276@walter.bellcore.com> lein@cat.uucp (John Leinaweaver) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov16.154927.26542@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> kkc@nursing.arizona.edu writes:
>>>
>>>>>AP
>>>>>
>>>>>1. Miami
>>>>>2. Alabama
>>>>>3. FSU
>>>>>4. Texas A&M
>>>>>
>>>>>FSU jumps over Texas A&M, with a blow out with Tulane.
>>>>>      :
>>>>>      :
>>>>>      :
>>>>>Texas A&M is not happy about the AP polls, but are still in the race.   
>>>>>Unless, FSU makes it to #2 and meets Miami in the Fiesta.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>Couldn't agree with you more, A&M did nothing to merit a drop like that
>>>>in the polls. A W is a W and nobody remember how you did it later on. By
>>>>the way, how about the rest of the top 25?....
>>>>
>>>>Dave Elfering
>>> 
>>> Sure A&M deserves the lower poll ranking than FSU. A&M was unimpressive in 
>>> their win over Houston. IMO they do not deserve to be in the top 10. Which top
>>> 25 teams have they played so far?
>>
>>In the past, the ACC champ usualy received little respect - why should it
>>change  because it's Florida State.  FSU lost to the only quality team
>>they played, beating Tulane and Maryland (with the MO points theory) was
>>about as impressive as their win against ACC powerhouse Clemson (a win which
>>made the pollsters take them seriously).
>>
>>
>>John L
>>
>>
>If you watched ESPN, you would have seen Lee Corso constantly bashing
>A&M in favor of FSU. What makes him suspect is that he is a FSU alumni.
>A lot of AP pollsters may have be influenced by his propaganda.
>
>
>

Oh come now, a person would have to be a complete twit to be infulenced by
anything Meeks....er, Corso says. Most people here at FSU can't stand the guy,
and we all swear he really went to UF...couldn't be and FSU grad. :)
Of course, we are talking about pollsters so....maybe there is a chance they
were influenced by him...they are all of the same mold after all.

Kevin

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: Down to Business (OU/NU)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 01:04:49 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.145226.7287@sparky.imd.sterling.com> marko@IMD.Sterling.COM (Mark Olson) writes:
>What class are Steve Collins and Cale Gundy in (Fr, So, etc.)?  Also, Whatever
>happened to some of the great OU QB's, Jamelle Hollieway for instance?  Who was
>the QB in the seventies who wore the bandana under his helmet (kind of his
>trademark).  I read or heard somewhere that Charles Thompson was playing for a
>JUCO team somewhere.  The OU QB's were always memorable because they were just
>so damned good.  I can remember many games where they would spring a long one
>and, seemingly, would be in the grasp of the defensive back, only to pitch to
>the trailing halfback who would pop for more yards and usually a score.

Memories of good old days, eh? Too bad college football changed so much..
Now most teams play defense!!!

>Mark Olson  || marko@IMD.Sterling.COM -or- uunet!sparky!marko

Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: Oldest Rivalry in the South (was Re: Georgia 14, Auburn 10)
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:58:17 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.154740.27310@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>, oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day) writes:

> Duke beat UNC in 1888, but the series is not the oldest continuing
> rivalry, since Duke (then Trinity) dropped football for a 10+ year
> period at the request of the faculty (who cited rumors of, gasp,
> professionalism - lucky they aren't alive today!).

Hmmm.  Did they have tape recorders back then???

-- 
David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@accs.duc.auburn.edu
From: sfm@manduca.neurobio.arizona.edu (Stephen Matheson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: PAC-10 IS WEIRD
Date: 22 Nov 92 21:42:14 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

From article <cf3g8mS00iUxA3xUp=@andrew.cmu.edu>,
by wm1o+@andrew.cmu.edu (William Karamo Motley):

> Can anyone explain why the PAC-10 is so fucking unpredictable?????????
> 
> Will

Here's a thought: the PAC-10 is full of outstanding football teams.
"Predictable" football conferences have 2 or 3 good football teams
and 5-8 creampuffs.

Besides, who wants predictability?

--

Steve Matheson   Program in Neuroscience   University of Arizona
sfm@neurobio.arizona.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Re: Canes in the Graves-yard!
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 16:27:00 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: VMARK Software, Inc.

In article <1992Nov18.140724.771@cpqhou.compaq.com> chuckd@cpqhou.compaq.com (Chuck Dickson) writes:
>in article <1992Nov17.043522.15976@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>, saqx@vax5.cit.cornell.edu says:
>> 
>> Miami visits the Carrier Dome this Saturday for a game that will decide
>> which team plays for the national championship on January 1.  So come on, 
>> all you fans that "dislike" the Hurricanes with a passion---pull for the
>> Orange this weekend!  Pray for us; we'll need it!  But no woofing, please;
>> restrict statements of optimism to nothing stronger than "I think they 
>> can give Miami a game".  Thanks for your support.  
>> 
>>                         COME ON, ORANGEMEN!
>
>This game has the potential to show how ludicrous the Big East's champion
>is determined this year.
>
>If Syracuse beats Miami by a small margin, they would be unbeaten in the
>Big East and Miami would have one loss in the Conference.
>
>Yet, Miami might only drop a spot or two in the polls and Syracuse could
>gain a few spots, but potentially STILL BE RANKED BEHIND MIAMI AT THE END
>OF THE SEASON.  Therefore, since the Big East champion is determined by the
>highest ranking in the national polls, a one conference loss Hurricane team
>would claim the Big East championship over an undefeated (in the conference)
>Syracuse team.
>
>Only in the Big Easy....

And only for this year..  As I remember, next year they begin with true
conference play, and thus, a true conference champion.  Remember, Miami 
will only play 4 Big East teams this year..
>
-- 
David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rownd@moby.micro.umn.edu (Brooks Kerry Rownd)
Subject: Re: BIG TEN ROLLS OVER IN ITS GRAVE!
Organization: University of Minnesota CIS
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 19:11:29 GMT

	MINNESOTA CRUSHES IOWA 28-13

	Yep, no bowl for Iowa.  Minnesota starts this year's starting QB to
	a 10-10 halftime tie.  Sophmore QB fills in next two quarters for
	21-32-0 261yds. 2 tds.  Boys, I think we got a new starting QB.

	Highlights:
	*Minnesota punts on third down.  (3rd and 24 at ~ the 1 yd. line)
	*Minnesota fakes feild-goal to set up TD.
	*59 yard TD pass.  Flea-flicker for another 50+ yard pass.
	*Minnesota scores 3 4th quarter TDs and all extra points are blocked.
	One of them kicked and fumbled all the way to the Minn. 30.
	*Minnesota kicks off to Iowa on the following play from the IOWA 45
	due to pass interference on the above pass and an illegal forward
	pass on the above blocked point.
	*Floyd the pig is home.

woof, woof, woof, oink, woof, woof - unusual noise in Minnesota!!!

Big10 lowlights: Wisconsin, Iowa, Indiana lose.  Michigan ties OSU.


====-----=-----=-----=-----=-----====-----=-----==-----=-----==-----=-----====
Brooks Kerry Rownd         \/     ||  In wilderness is 
bkrrrrrllama69er           /\     ||        the preservation of the world...
brooks@ast1.spa.umn.edu __/__\__  ||                          -Metallica, OWAM
(128.101.221.1)          /    \   ||                  (also thx to kate marie)
====-----=-----=-----=-----=-----====-----=-----==-----=-----==-----=-----====

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college