HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bill.nadzam@pcs.sj.ca.us (Bill Nadzam)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Antenna Question
Date: 23 Jan 93 11:44:00 GMT
Reply-To: bill.nadzam@pcs.sj.ca.us (Bill Nadzam)
Organization: PCS-BBS - San Jose, CA - 408-270-4085

MGNewsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
MGFrom: mgustof@hfglobe.intel.com (Mark Gustoff)
MGSubject: Antenna Question
MGMessage-ID: <C19Fow.L54@hfglobe.intel.com>
MGDate: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:46:07 GMT
MG
MGSome years ago I cut and article out of one
MGof the Ham magazines on Coaxial Dipole
MGconstruction. I don't remember what magazine,
MGand I don't even know what year, but I wish
MGto build one of these antennas for 28.4 mHz,
MGand I have no idea what dimensions the
MGcoaxial section should be as opposed to the
MGwire ends. The antenna looked something like
MGthis when completed:
MG
MG
MG  Wire       Coax            Coax         Wire
MG-----------===============X=============----------
MG
MGX = Feedpoint with RG-8 Coax.
MG
MGThe part where the wire attached to the coax, the
MGcoax center conductor and braid were shorted together
MGand connected to the wire.
MG
MG
MGAnyway, I could use formulas or actual dimensions
MGgathered from articles on such an antenna. Or maybe
MGthere are users of this antenna whom are familiar
MGwith its construction.
MG
MG
MGI think this antenna might have been called a
MGDouble Bazooka also, but maybe not.
MG
MGAny help appreciated
MG
MG73, WO7T Mark
MG
---
 . EZ 1.37 . From A.R.S. K8WN _._. __._
                                                                                                                               
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: gallaghe@gdc.com (Robert Gallagher)
Subject: Kenwood tm-732 mod/functions
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1993 16:35:40 -0500 (EST)
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA17445; Wed, 20 Jan 93 22:41:54 -0800
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA06777; Wed, 20 Jan 93 22:41:50 -0800
X-Received: from esun_server40.UUCP by uu.psi.com (5.65b/4.1.031792-PSI/PSINet)
	id AA16280; Thu, 21 Jan 93 01:28:43 -0500
X-Received: from esun223.gdc.com by gdc.com (4.1/GDC-1.1)
	id AA16084; Wed, 20 Jan 93 16:35:41 EST
X-To: rec.radio.amateur.misc.usenet
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL0]
X-Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Content-Length: 301       

I just purchased a Kenwood TM-732 dual band mobile transceiver and was wondering
if anyone was aware of any mods. or hidden functions this radio may have.  I
do have the mod for extended trans. and 800MHz receive if anyone needs these I
can supply the information.

Thanks in advance,

Rob - KD1MF

 
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: slanka@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu (Ishantha Lokuge)
Subject: General Class Licence - HELP!!!!
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 03:57:01 GMT

Hello!

Could someone tell a good way to prepare for the general class
license? I am looking for a book that contains the material and
the general class question pool. Also, some tapes for code. Thanks
in advance for your help. Please email to:

slanka@chaos.cs.brandeis.edu

-Ishantha.
From: flloyd@l1-a.West.Sun.COM (Fred Lloyd [Phoenix SE])
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: New Products
Date: 25 Jan 1993 18:01:54 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Phoenix, AZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-a.west.sun.com



Well, I'm surprised that nobody's mentioned several of the new
products which have been announced lately so here goes:

IC-737

	May the IC-735 go down in history as its worthy predecessor,
	Icom has finally announced the IC-737 (See the Feb QST or
	CQ mags).  It looks very good and built to compete with the
	TS-450 in many ways.  Now includes 100 memories, band stacking,
	built in auto-tuner, keyboard frequency entry, and LCD
	display.  Still has an analog S-meter which many will appreciate.
	HRO says that it will be priced in the mid $1200 range.


IC-W21A

	Very handsome new dual band HT to replace the W2.  Said to
	have two microphones and look somewhat like a telephone
	handpiece.  Has the usual features plus a couple of new
	ones like automatic output power adjustment based on 
	strength of the received signal.  Better display than the W2.
	Damn it, they had to design yet another battery case... :-(


AEA's replacement for the PK-232

	Nice looking unit (See Feb QST) with big LCD display.
	No more LED's.  Still has a sensitivity knob, which looks
	like a bug to me.  KAM doesn't need a knob, why does AEA?


QST

	The February 1993 issue of QST looks VERY good.  Some more
	new formats, and a couple of new sections.  Hats off to ARRL
	for their fine work in improving the format.


-fred



-- 
[ Fred Lloyd, AA7BQ                             Fred.Lloyd@West.Sun.COM ]
[ Sun Microsystems,           Southwest Area Solaris Transition Manager ]
[ Phoenix, AZ                                            (602) 275-4242 ]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: oh2lak@krksun.krk.fi (Erik Finskas)
Subject: Re: InstantTrack
Organization: Radio Club of Kauniainen (OH2NRG)
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:35:57 GMT

John M. Orange (cn158@cleveland.Freenet.Edu) wrote:
: Also, does anyone know where on Internet I may find AMSAT 
: element sets??

NASA elements are presented at SCI.SPACE.NEWS by TS Kelso, from
there they are copied to REC.RADIO.AMATEUR.MISC and REC.RADIO.INFO.
At least at REC.RADIO.AMATEUR.MISC nasa elements are converted into
amsat format. I think also REC.RADIO.INFO is in amsat format distribution.
(It is a new group, I don't know sure)

Amsat elements are available also at packet network, they are quite fast
sent there to @AMSAT distribution. Contact your local packet manager
if you have problems finding them from there.

73 de Erik OH2LAK
--
E R I K  F I N S K A S        OH2LAK        R     A
------------------------------------       RADIO AMATEUR
InterNet:       Erik.Finskas@krk.fi         D    HAM   A
                OH2LAK@krk.fi               I     T  RADIO
Amateur Packet: OH2LAK@OH2RBI.FIN.EU        O     E    I
------------------------------------              U    O
   H   A   M     R   A   D   I   O                R
             J   E   E   Z
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: mellob@cary115.its.rpi.edu (Elmer Fudd)
Subject: No-codes
Reply-To: mellob@rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 05:56:29 GMT


	It's understandable that no-code technicians would be aggravated
	by being designated as such. This is why I refer to a no-code
	tech as simply a "Technician." And refer to a Technician as a
	"Technician Plus HF" or simply a "Tech Plus." After all, that's
	what's printed on my Certificate of Successful Completion.
	
	-Brett    mellob@rpi.edu
	 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
	 Troy, New York


Xref: sparky rec.radio.amateur.misc:23161 rec.radio.amateur.packet:3592
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Tracking the Digital Fox?
From: steve@vulture.ksc.nasa.gov (Steve Schindler)
Date: 25 Jan 93 10:07:13 EST
Organization: Voice Systems Branch, NASA - Kennedy Space Center

How difficult would it be to DF a packet station on 1) a clear channel with
only the fox transmitting, and 2) on a shared channel with multiple users?

This could be a new source of aggrevation for the fox hunting masochist!


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Schindler     Voice Systems Branch      NASA - Kennedy Space Center 
internet: steve@vulture.ksc.nasa.gov
NASAmail: (site:smtpmail,id:<steve(a)vulture.ksc.nasa.gov>)
From: jkeller@pica.army.mil (Jerome Keller, PPD)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: ENDURANCE
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:26:05 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

A few days ago, Joe Mastroianni, AA6YD, invited all of us here in net-land to
partake of his short story "ENDURANCE" in the Feb issue of QST. This message
of congratulations is for Joe....

Just finished "ENDURANCE"....couldn't put it down !! As a fan(atic) of "real"
science fiction for most of my 49 years, I feel qualified to assign such
superlatives as "top-notch" and "first-rate" to your story, Joe. Was this
your FIRST effort? If so, it had best NOT be your last....you have at least
this one new fan begging for MORE !

If you like exciting, adventurous story-telling....that combines the best
elements of sci-fi with our beloved radio hobby....you absolutely MUST read
"ENDURANCE"......I rate it **** !!!!

                                  73.....Jerry, K1MER
From: randall@informix.com (Randall Rhea)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: ICOM-725 Info. (was ICOM-726)
Date: 21 Jan 93 01:28:49 GMT
Organization: Informix Software, Inc.

houlejm@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Jean-Marie Houle) writes:

>Does the AH-3 works with the 735? The litterature I have mentions the
>AH-2 for use with the 735. Maybe the AH-3 is a newer model that can
>replace the AH-2.
>I am asking because I am going to put the 735 in the boat next summer and
>I will need one.


If you have an AH-3, you can purchase an AH-2 controller unit
from Icom for about $150.  (They are frequently out-of-stock
though.)  This will make your AH-3 work with a 735.  

If you have neither tuner, then just buy an AH-2.

The controller unit is a bit bulky, and it has several cables
that must be connected to the 735.  It's a pretty bad design
if you ask me.  The AH-3 on the other hand connects to the
726 with just one cable.

73 DE KK6MY

-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Randall Rhea                                        Informix Software, Inc. 
Project Manager, MIS Sales/Marketing Systems    uunet!pyramid!infmx!randall
From: molson@bml4380.cpg.cdc.com (Mark Olson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Power supplies
Date: 27 Jan 93 20:40:33 GMT
Reply-To: molson@bml4380.cpg.cdc.com (Mark Olson)


  
    Just a note to contribute to the thread regarding computer/switching power supplies
attached to ham rigs.   I've had good luck with a 12v/22A supply I bought surplus.  Being
concerned about RFI,  I made sure the power supply was fully enclosed, and added capacitive
shunts to the DC output leads,  and an EMI filter in the AC input.  I have used this with 
a ICOM 3230 mobile rig (which draws about 11A), and have had no problems.  Regulation
has been rock solid, typical variation is less than .01 volt between receive and transmit, and
I don't have any discernible RF noise from the switcher.
  
   I did get a little concerned with failure modes, and installed a circuit breaker/crowbar
overvoltage circuit on the unit.
 
   Best of all, the thing is 5" by 3" by 11", weighs less than 5 lbs,  doesn't get hot, and only
cost me $40.
  
   Mark Olson        N0VEM/AE    (license granted 1/19/93!)
From: randall@informix.com (Randall Rhea)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Marge Simpson's sister is a ham!
Keywords: Simpsons, YL
Date: 26 Jan 93 03:18:14 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Informix Software, Inc.


Hams are made fun of on TV and movies quite a lot.   We're seen
as wierd techno-nerds.  The Simpsons' episode is no exception.
The general public has no idea why we would want to operate
a radio transmitter, or deal with all those wires and knobs.

73 DE KK6MY   techno-nerdy and proud of it!

-- 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Randall Rhea                                        Informix Software, Inc. 
Project Manager, MIS Sales/Marketing Systems    uunet!pyramid!infmx!randall
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: fleekdc@expert.cc.purdue.edu (Dan Fleek)
Subject: Re: Ham Radio Causes Cancer
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 17:46:37 GMT

In article <44051@zygot.ati.com> john@zygot.ati.com (John Higdon) writes:
>
>I swear if I hear about one more thing that "causes cancer"...
>

I can understand a higher rate of cancer among hams.  When I took my 
license exam, the examiners and other club hams at the test were 
chain smoking.  After about 20 minutes I went outside to get some air
so my eyes would quit watering.  Members of our local club don't smoke
fortunately.

Dan
N9PNA
From: rtaylor@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Roger Taylor)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: 6BQ5 data wanted
Date: 26 Jan 93 14:52:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: ux1.C1Guop.BwG
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

klaudon@pica.army.mil writes:

>While you are looking through your tube manuals, there is one (I think the
>RCA manual of around 1970) which also contained a series of schematics of 
>tube audio amplifier circuits, along with discussion and component lists.
>My dad asked me to look for these at the same time (it's his friend who
>is doing the exhibit).  My dad developed some very unusual designs of his
>own as a young man that were way ahead of their time for his own audio hobby.
>These were balanced, fully DC coupled tube audio amps that sounded great.
>The biasing schemes were very innovative, as I recall.

	Your dad didn't happen to go to Rose Polytech in the late 50's
	did he?  We built some great DC coupled amplifiers out of banks
	of 6080's as I remember that had bass response down to DC and 
	drove Hartley speakers with their 2 inch displacement that sent
	waves of deep bass organ notes rolling down the dorm halls.  Sure
	beat the low end response of anything on the market today.
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.com (Michael P. Deignan)
Subject: Re: Real NoCodes
Organization: Small Business Systems, Incorporated, Smithfield, RI 02917
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 23:00:02 GMT

little@nuts2u.enet.dec.com (nuts2u::little) writes:

>Actually I submit this as proof that the code requirement causes anal
>retentive behavior in most people.  Fortunately for those who've upgraded
>and resisted the urge to be an asshole or joke in poor taste, there's not a
>100% affliction rate.

Actually, if you had been privy to the entire incident, and had not
formed your opinion based upon one-sided private e-mail posted by 
an individual, then you would know that this entire episode started 
from one individual sending a user on this system vulgar e-mail
over his .signature.


>PS  To those of you on node anomoly, please stay off the weak signal and
>    satellite sub bands and stick with the refugees on 14.313.  It's hard
>    enough copying DX on those sub bands without the additional noise.

Nah, we hang out on 3885 AM, or UHF.

MD
-- 
--  Michael P. Deignan, KD1HZ               ------------------------
--  Domain: mpd@anomaly.sbs.com             -  I'm not a bigot,    -
--    UUCP: ...!uunet!anomaly!mpd           -  I hate everyone...  -
-- Telebit: +1 401 455 0347                 ------------------------
From: clemon@lemsys.UUCP (Craig Lemon VE3XCL)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: 144/400MHz mobile shopping
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 18:08:17 EST
Summary: What do YOU think?
Distribution: world
Organization: Private UUCP "Twig" Node
X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00

        Hello fellow hams!  I am planning on buying a VHF/UHF mobile in the
spring and I would like to ask the net for your opinions AND experiences. 
Please forward any experiences that you find relavent to me because an
actually USER of a particular radio telling me what they really like or
what really bugs them about their rig is probably worth 10 times as much as
glossy spew from the factory :-).

        Specifically, I am looking for a high-power radio (50W range
instead of 25W range) with 144/440 capability.  Both bands are to be
independent in listening, display, operation, and preferably CTCSS
(decode).  I am also seriously considering a remotable unit as this will
start out in the house and this could prove useful.  Minimum requirement is
cross-banding to a repeater (ie. offset enabled).  The units I am looking
at are the Kenwood TM-741A (and possibly 732), (the one by Standard), and
the Alinco DR600.  I'm not crazy about the ICOM 2410H, but if someone can
convince me, I may go for it.

        The information that I am looking for are things such as which
radios have DUAL CTCSS decoders (not just a single audio mute like many
handhelds), separate decode/encode frequencies when in crossband mode,
spearate encode/decode frequencies when operating in the same band,
reliability, ***INTERMOD*** (this is a BIGGY!) and general operating
performance and convenience.

        On a related note, can anyone tell me ANYTHING about this standard
mobile.  It's the one pictured grey with a green light up display in the
mic and the control head in a recent magazine.  Any information at all
would be welcome.  Standard seems to have high prices compared with
everyone else.  Is this due to quality or scarsity?

        Thank you for any help you can offer.

73 de Craig.


--
 Craig Lemon VE3XCL (Advanced) - Kitchener, Ontario. +1 519 741 0297
 clemon@lemsys.UUCP clemon%lemsys@xenitec.on.ca  | 1B Electrical Engineering
 TCP/IP: ve3xcl@ve3xcl.ampr.org [44.135.84.51]   |  University of Waterloo
 AX.25 Packet: ve3xcl@ve3euk.#SWON.ON.CAN.NA     | Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: Kirk.Smith@launchpad.unc.edu (Kirk Smith)
Subject: Re: Transmitting 50-178 & 300-512?
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:10:32 GMT

In article <C17MA5.MpA@wang.com> dbushong@wang.com (Dave Bushong) writes:
>johnr@f1.facts.uky.edu (john roberts) writes:
>
>>I have this friend who has a radio modified to transmit from 50-178 and  
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>

So why is everybody flaming this guy for transmitting out of band, 
instead of flaming him for claiming the radio has a Tx bandwidth
of 50-178 and 300-512MHz?  Doesn't that seem a bit wide for everyone
to believe?  It does to me...

-KD6RCT





--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
From: n9ljx@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Scott A Stembaugh)
Subject: Re: Stop the bickering, please...
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 21:54:32 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.202200.15919@venus.ic.cmc.ca> pas@jupiter.ic.cmc.ca writes:
>In article <125.staggsd@walker-pcgw.army.mil>, staggsd@walker-pcgw.army.mil (1LT David Staggs) writes:
>|> 
>|>  After reading all the messages about No Codes, I think it is interesting that
>|>  people would waste others time by writing such messages.  The best thing to do
>|>  is to stop writing these messages.  Who cares what type of license a fellow
>|>  ham has?  You cannot please everyone all the time.  And this discussion (or
>|>  bitterness) does no good.  If some people think No Codes are scum of the
>|>  Earth, then fine.  Life goes on.  But please don't waste others time by
>|>  feeding the fire.  It is talk like this that may convince others not to become
>|>  a ham.  So, please.  Enough is enough.  I think others will thank you for it.
>|>  Regards,
>|>  Dave
>|>  KD6QKF/HL9ST (Korea)
>
>Better yet, take it to rec.radio.amateur.policy where it belongs.
>
>Peter
>

NO NO NO!! Take it to alt.flame!
--sas

-- 
Scott Stembaugh - N9LJX           internet: n9ljx@ecn.purdue.edu
Operations Supervisor, ADPC       phone:    317 494 7946 
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN 47907-1061
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: swirsky@adobe.com (Robert Swirsky)
Subject: Re: Ham Radio Causes Cancer!
Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated, Mountain View
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 01:18:47 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.152134.5792@newsgate.sps.mot.com> rapw20@email.sps.mot.com writes:
>Speaking of ham radio and cancer, I'm sure many of you have seen the news  
>coverage of the lawsuit accusing cellular phones of causing cancer. I saw  
>a report of it last night on NBC. 

I always thought that hams (and sw listeners &c.) could use this public
concern over RF energy as a tool to overturn laws that restrict the
reception of the Cellular Phone frequencies on certain scanners.

You just have to convince the public, and your elected officials, that
it is important to have the ability to monitor this radiation that some
believe to cause health risks.

An argument that would work in these environmentally sensitive times
is that the cellular companies lobbied for the ban on receivers so that
the public wouldn't be able to measure the amount of RF energy around them.

Attacking the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act (or whatever it's called) on the basis that a citizen has
a right to monitor something that is a possible health risk might prove
more successful than attacking it with other arguments. 
-- 
"Duff Beer for Me,
 Duff Beer for You,
 I'll have a Duff Beer,
 You'll have one, too!"	 -- Duff Gardens Theme Song
From: dave@eram.esi.COM.AU (Dave Horsfall)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Real NoCodes
Date: 27 Jan 93 23:26:02 GMT
Organization: Pacific ESI, Sydney, AUSTRALIA
X-Disclaimer: "Me, speak for us?"
X-Witty-Saying: "Mobius strip - see other side for instructions"

Instead of this childish name-calling, why don't we have a bit of fun
instead, and turn the list around?  Something like:

-----

Real OldFarts think CW is the only efficient means of communications,
even though advances in DSP technology have long since overtaken them.

Real OldFarts think that CW ought to be retained, because one day you
will need it to join two wires together following an aircraft crash.

Real OldFarts think that CW will never die out, even though they are just
about the only people still using it on a regular basis.

Real OldFarts think that CW is the only way to pass traffic, satellites
and wormholes etc notwithstanding.

Real OldFarts believe that everybody ought to do CW, because _they_ did.

-----

I'm sure we could think up a few more...  And how about "Real Extras ..." ?

-- 
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU)         VK2KFU @ VK2RWI.NSW.AUS.OC
dave@esi.COM.AU                ...munnari!esi.COM.AU!dave
From: oler@rho.uleth.CA (Cary Oler)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Daily Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for 22 January
Date: 23 Jan 93 20:52:58 GMT
Organization: ucsd usenet gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

!!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 022, 01/22/93
10.7 FLUX=104.2  90-AVG=140        SSN=049      BKI=0211 1222  BAI=004
BGND-XRAY=B1.1     FLU1=1.2E+05  FLU10=1.0E+04  PKI=0211 1223  PAI=005
  BOU-DEV=004,012,008,006,006,011,015,016   DEV-AVG=009 NT     SWF=00:000
 XRAY-MAX= B1.5   @ 2040UT    XRAY-MIN= B1.0   @ 1910UT   XRAY-AVG= B1.1
NEUTN-MAX= +003%  @ 2210UT   NEUTN-MIN= -002%  @ 0110UT  NEUTN-AVG= +0.3%
  PCA-MAX= +1.7DB @ 0015UT     PCA-MIN= -0.4DB @ 0840UT    PCA-AVG= +0.0DB
BOUTF-MAX=55415NT @ 1558UT   BOUTF-MIN=55390NT @ 1932UT  BOUTF-AVG=55406NT
GOES7-MAX=P:+112NT@ 1952UT   GOES7-MIN=N:+005NT@ 1003UT  G7-AVG=+081,+028,+010
GOES6-MAX=P:+131NT@ 1919UT   GOES6-MIN=E:-010NT@ 1920UT  G6-AVG=+098,-000,+037
 FLUXFCST=STD:105,105,110;SESC:105,105,110 BAI/PAI-FCST=005,005,015/007,010,015
    KFCST=1112 3111 1112 3111  27DAY-AP=002,003   27DAY-KP=0011 1210 0012 1210
 WARNINGS=
   ALERTS=
!!END-DATA!!
From: wwm@ef5003.efhd.ford.com (Bill Meahan)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Any other W9RG DSP Filter users on the Net ?
Date: 25 Jan 1993 13:46:09 GMT
Organization: Ford Motor Co., EFHD Ypsilanti Operations
NNTP-Posting-Host: ef5003.efhd.ford.com


For those of us who didn't get the Sept, 1992 QST, could someone post a
short summary of the W9RG pkg?  What?  Where?  How much?  etc.		


Tnx es 73 de WA8TZG

-- 
Bill Meahan			|EFHD Information Systems Staff
Plant Floor Systems Specialist	|Ford Motor Company
wwm@ef5003.efhd.ford.com      	| +1 313 487 6122
..!fmsrl7!pmsmam!wwm           |I'm not paid to speak for Ford!