From: testreply@hactar.hanse.de (Reflector-Daemon)
Subject: Mails an reflector@hactar.hanse.de
Newsgroups: hanse.test,amiga.test,de.test,de.alt.test,de.alt.megatest
Reply-To: postmaster@hactar.hanse.de (Posthamster)
X-Rflct-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1992 12:00:09 +0200
X-Rflct-Version: testreplyd.c 0.91f (Aug 22 1992 12:30:10), (c) wusel@hactar.hanse.de
Subliminal-Message: no reply
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1992 12:00:09 +0200

no reply

     Es folgt  eine Liste  eventuell  fehlgeschlagener  Reflektormails
von reflector@hactar.hanse.de.

### Returned Mail
### Org-To: (not available)
### Org-ID: (not available)
> From: Postmaster@fhg.de
> Date: 04 Sep 92 15:06:17+0100
> 
>
> Your message had been relayed through an X.400 network, which has issued
> a "delivery report". The syntax of these reports had been devised to
> fit the needs of X.400 user software; it is a terse binary structure.
> Our gateway is making its best effort to present this information in an
> understandable manner; we apology for its esoteric structure.
> 
> The report contains information on the following recipients:
> 
> <news@sunplt.ipk.fhg.dbp.de>: Transfer failure.
> Loop detected (Report that bug to your postmaster).
> 
> Before meeting its fate, your message had been forwarded through
> the X.400 network, as indicated by the following traces:
> 
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 13:01:34 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 13:00:49 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:58:33 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:58:09 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:57:50 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:57:21 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:56:54 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:56:26 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:56:03 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:55:35 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:55:04 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:54:39 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:54:19 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 12:53:56 GMT
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 14:58:08+0100
> X400-Received: by /ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 04 Sep 92 14:58:07+0200
> X400-Received: by /PRMD=fhg/ADMD=dbp/C=de/;
> 	Relayed; 30 Aug 92 05:30:00 GMT
> 
> By chance, we have been able to extract from the X.400 network a copy
> of your original message. Some fields may look strange, as they have
> been converted back and forth, but we hope that the information will
> be useful. Here is your original message:
> 
> Date: 30 Aug 92 05:30:00 GMT
> From: Daemon for group de.test <reflector@hactar.hanse.de>
> Reply-To: Posthamster of hactar.hanse.de <postmaster@hactar.hanse.de>
> Message-ID: <m0mOW1E-0000cdg@hactar.hanse.de>
> To: news@sunplt.ipk.fhg.dbp.de
> cc: reflector.sent@hactar.hanse.de
> Subject: received your article
> 
> Moin news@sunplt.ipk.fhg.de,
> 
> this is an automagic reply for newsgroup de.test.
> 
> Your Article       <news.714923336@sunplt>
> with the Subject  "test",
> posting date       27 Aug 92 13:48:56 GMT, has been
> received here on   Sat, 29 Aug 1992 18:51:21 MES-02, after covering the
> following Path:   "hactar!malihh!news.Hamburg.Germany.EU.net!news.netmbx.de!zrz.tu-berlin.de!ceres.fokus.gmd.de!gmdtub!sunplt!news".
> Size of header     327 Bytes,
> size of body       5 Bytes.
> 
> Your complete, unaltered article follows right after this:
> ---cut---
> Path: hactar!malihh!news.Hamburg.Germany.EU.net!news.netmbx.de!zrz.tu-berlin.de!ceres.fokus.gmd.de!gmdtub!sunplt!news
> From: news@sunplt.ipk.fhg.de
> Newsgroups: de.test
> Subject: test
> Summary: test
> Keywords: test
> Message-ID: <news.714923336@sunplt>
> Date: 27 Aug 92 13:48:56 GMT
> Distribution: de
> Organization: IPK-Berlin
> Lines: 1
> 
> test
> ---cut---
> 
> No reply would have been sent if you would have included at least one of
> the following keywords _anywhere_ in your article:
> 
>    "control: ", "no reply", "no replies", "ignore", "keine replies",
>    "keine antwort", "keine rueckmeldung".
> 
> Hope this was helpful to you,
> 			postmaster@hactar.hanse.de
> 

### Returned Mail
### Org-To: sybase@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Sybase Administrator)
### Org-ID: <sybase.715518645@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
> From: <MAILER-DAEMON@mcshh.hanse.de>
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 92 04:18 MESZ
> Subject: mail failed, returning to sender
>
> |------------------------- Failed addresses follow: ---------------------|
>  informatik.tu-chemnitz.de!sybase ... transport inet_zone_smtp: 550 Unknown local user 'sybase'
> |------------------------- Message text follows: ------------------------|

### Returned Mail
### Org-To: root@voka.uucp (0000-Admin(0000))
### Org-ID: <1992Aug28.193650.1471@voka.uucp>
> From: <MAILER-DAEMON@mail.Hamburg.Germany.EU.net>
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 92 05:01 MESZ
> Subject: mail failed, returning to sender
>
> |------------------------- Failed addresses follow: ---------------------|
>  <voka.uucp!root> ... transport smtp: 554 <voka.uucp!root>... no such host : voka
> |------------------------- Message text follows: ------------------------|

     Fragen, Kommentare  usw.  bitte  an  den  Verantwortlichen fuer dieses
Posting (vgl. Reply-To:).  Dieser Artikel  wurde  maschinell  erstellt,  er
traegt daher weder Unterschrift noch Siegel.

     Bitte beachten:  bei `reflector' handelt es sich um einen News-Reflek-
tor - BITTE keine Testmails an diese Adresse schicken! Zu diesem Zweck ggf.
eine Mail an `mirror@germany.eu.net' senden (im `Subject:' die EIGENE Mail-
adresse angeben), KEINESFALLS an `reflector@hactar.hanse.de'!