HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Where are gethostbyname() & getservbyname()?
Date: 2 Jan 93 17:21:18 GMT
Organization: Naval Medical Research & Development Command

In article <1993Jan2.144136.29452@athena.mit.edu> nmp08@rz.uni-kiel.dbp.de writes:
>I have a problem with the new gcc-2.3.3 stuff: several packages won't compile
>anymore (e.g. plp) because of two missing functions: 'gethostbyname()' and 
>'getservbyname()'. ld claims about not finding these symbols.
>Where are these functions gone?
>
>Any hints would be appreciated.
>Please reply to: nmp08@rz.uni-kiel.dbp.de
> 

I believe H.J. Lu left the networking functions out of the original release
"last year" (week).  They seemed to be added now, at least on tsx-11.mit.edu.

-- 
===========================================================================
  phil perucci      | "Any opinions expressed are solely my own views and 
  ssb1pzp@digex.com |  do not reflect the position of any organization"
===========================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: dws@cseg03.uark.edu (David W. Summers)
Subject: Re: A discipline for packages
Organization: University of Arkansas
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 04:46:49 GMT

nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson) writes:

>When you install a package, it inserts itself inextricably into
>various places in your system.
>
>What I would rather see is a subdirectory per package.  For example,
>/package/sendmail (and the corresponding subdirectories lib, src, cf,
>man.1, man.5, man.8, bin, etc).
>
>-russ <nelson@crynwr.com> What canst *thou* say?
>Crynwr Software           Crynwr Software sells packet driver support.
>11 Grant St.              315-268-1925 Voice  |  LPF member - ask me about
>Potsdam, NY 13676         315-268-9201 FAX    |  the harm software patents do.

This sounds a LOT like what the new SunOS 5 (aka Solars 2.X) does.  Maybe 
Linux could do the same?   Solaris does it in the /opt directory.

It can add and remove packages (pkgadd, pkgrm) and list the packages installed
(pkginfo, pkglist(???)) or something like that.  Pretty spiffy.  That way you
can always DE-install what you have installed and get a list of the currently
installed packages.

   -David Summers
   (dws@engr.uark.edu)

-- 
                         "Never under-estimate the bandwidth of a station-wagon
David Summers             full of tapes, hurtling down the highway."
dws@engr.uark.edu         - Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks"
From: newton@monty.apana.org.au (Mark Newton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Distribution: world
Subject: Re: Macintosh format disks
Organization: APANA South Australia - State mail hub
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 92 12:58:10 +1030

jliddle@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu (Jean Liddle) writes:
> In article <1992Dec7.225330.10418@news.columbia.edu> jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox) writes:
> >  I would be very surprised if Linux could be made to read Mac 400k or
> >800k floppies, as the low-level layout of the disks is different, and
> >I don't think PC hardware could read it.  The 1440k floppies would be
> >the only possibility.  (Conceivably, I suppose, the SCSI drivers could
> 
> How different are mac disks (formatwise) really?  FDFORMAT for MSDOG can
> format and read 400k and 800k floppies, as well as 1.72 MB HD floppies. 
> Theoretically, linux should be able to do the same, with probably a great
> deal more eligance than FDFORMAT/DOS. 

You'll need new hardware.

The rotation speed of Mac disks changes, depending on how far the head
is from the centre of the disk.  Unfortunately, most standard PeeCee 
disk hardware doesn't have any means of controlling the speed of revolution.

The designers of the Mac emulator for the Amiga ran up against this
problem.  At first they "solved" it by supplying an interface to plug
a real Mac drive into, but that wasn't a very good solution ('cos Mac
drives have that multicoloured Apple on 'em, so they're expensive!).
In the second release of the emulator, they supplied a card which varied
the speed of the floppy drives by stepping the motor at varying rates
(Pulse, pulse, pulse...).  Yukko.

> Now understanding the macintosh
> file system might be a bit more tricky ... :)

Yes!

  - mark

--------------------------------------------------------------------
"Do not worry about an infinite            newton@monty.apana.org.au
supply of gibbons..." - Al Dearle                        Mark Newton
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: My own bootdisk?
Date: 28 Dec 92 23:42:27 GMT
Organization: Naval Medical Research & Development Command

Hi,

  HELP - How do I make bootable floppy?

  I have checked FAQ, install.txt, guide.txt, and the GCC distribution's
README.  I followed the instructions in the GCC rootdisk README, to no
avail.  Does anyone have clear, idiot-proof instructions on how to make
        ---------------------------------------------------------------  

a bootable floppy?
----------------- 

I tried with LILO 0.7 as specified in README for GCC rootdisk, it dies
with "init: exec rc failed".  Yes I have /etc/rc on floppy.  777 type,
even (chmod 777 /mnt/etc/rc).  Two things look funny:

  1) With other bootdisks I have seen (GCC & SLS), I don't see LILO message.

  2) About 1/2 way through, I am prompted to "put in root disk and press ENTER"


HELP!


-- 
===========================================================================
  phil perucci      | "Any opinions expressed are solely my own views and 
  ssb1pzp@digex.com |  do not reflect the position of any organization"
===========================================================================
From: dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: My own bootdisk?
Date: 29 Dec 92 03:43:29 GMT
Organization: Naval Medical Research & Development Command

In article <C0001w.IMx@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil> dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci) writes:
>In article <Bzztur.HJ8@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil> dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci) writes:
>>I tried with LILO 0.7 as specified in README for GCC rootdisk, it dies
>>with "init: exec rc failed".  Yes I have /etc/rc on floppy.  777 type,
>>even (chmod 777 /mnt/etc/rc).  Two things look funny:
>>
>>  1) With other bootdisks I have seen (GCC & SLS), I don't see LILO message.
>
>OOPS! Brain damage here!  GCC rootdisk (bootable) DOES use LILO!
>My mistake.  But still - When I boot from floppy w/0.99pl1 & LILO 0.7
>WHY do I get prompted for root disk in /dev/fd0???

FINALLY I GOT IT!  Thank-you VERY much for all replies.
Problem was /etc/inittab calling my uugetty.  Was hanging for some reason.
Oh well, at least uugetty works from HD!

"Stand-alone" backup, HERE I COME!

-- 
===========================================================================
  phil perucci      | "Any opinions expressed are solely my own views and 
  ssb1pzp@digex.com |  do not reflect the position of any organization"
===========================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: creacy@yuppie.enet.dec.com (Chet Creacy)
Subject: Re: Need help booting Linux off HD
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 22:22:11 GMT


In article <72759@cup.portal.com>, DO@cup.portal.com (JEFF SCOTT MARCUS) writes...
>I am having troubles installing Lilo .7 on my system. I am trying to 
>install it on a 100MB IDE with an 8MB DOS active partition and a 64MB 
>Linux partition. I finaly got Lilo installed (and kept from stomping my 
>DOS primary) and DOS boots up fine, Linux however does not. Here is my
>Lilo config. file -
> 
>install=/etc/lilo/boot.b
>boot=/dev/hda
>delay=10
>other=/dev/hda1
>table=/dev/hda
>image=/Image
> 
>When I run Lilo I get this message -
> 
>Reading boot sector from /dev/hda
>Merging with /etc/lilo/boot.b
>Device 0x0302: BIOS drive 0x80, 7 heads, 868 cylinders,
>               34 sectors. Partition offset: 12376 sectors.
>Secondary loader: 3 sectors.
>Device 0x0302: BIOS drive 0x80, 7 heads, 868 cylinders,
>               34 sectors. Partition offset: 34 sectors.
>Mapped 2 (1+1) sectors.
>Added hda1
>    <dev=0x80,hd=4,cyl=122,sct=67>
>Boot image: /Image
>Device 0x0302: BIOS drive 0x80, 7 heads, 868 cylinders,
>               34 sectors. Partition offset: 12376 sectors.
>Mapped 846 sectors.
>Added Image
>    <dev=0x80,hd=4,cyl=122,sct=68>
>Map file size: 7168 bytes.
> 
>Now when I boot Linux everything looks normal until it reaches the 
>"partition tables ok" message and then I get -
> 
>MINIX-fs: Unable to read superblock
>EXT-fs: Unable to read superblock              (never used mkefs)
>MSDOS bread failed
>isofs_read_super: bread failed, dev 0x343 iso_blknum16
>Kernel panic: Unable to mount root
> 
>And then it dies :( I am brand new to Linux/Unix and cant find mention in
>the docs I have (and dont know how to use TeX to read the large Lilo
>docs, sniff) so would some kind soul please help me out ... hmmmmm??
>Oh btw, I am using the latest SLS root/boot release.
>                 
> 
>Jeff Marcus
>DO@cup.portal.com

I'm have the very same problem and I have printed the Lilo postscript doc.
It hasn't helped me to fix the problem.

Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks,

Chet
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: markus@mwhh.hanse.de (Markus Witt)
Subject: Re: serial ports - in/out
Organization: Nothin' is organized here.
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 17:12:25 GMT

rick@ee.uwm.edu (Rick Miller, Linux Device Registrar) writes:

> marcf@nexus.yorku.ca (Marc G Fournier) writes:
[...]
> >after installing FAS, there are two, one for dialin and one for
> >dialout (ttyF01&ttyFM01).  So, I have a getty running on ttyFM01 for
> >someone to log in on, and I have my uucico's dialing out on ttyF01.

> I've never heard of ttyF*...
>
> You can use "uugetty" (in the gettyps package) for your serial lines
> where you'd like to dial out.  It was designed to allow for outgoing
> connections, and uses the same lock-files as the uucp suite.

FAS is a Freeware serial driver for commercial SysV Unices that creates
the devices named ttyFM?? and ttyF??.

The advantage I see in this concept is that the driver itself is doing
the locking of the devices for ingoing and outgoing connections.
There is no need of special applications or all applications using the
same locking method.
-- 
                        Markus Witt, Hamburg (Germany)
          markus@mwhh.hanse.de      ...!uunet!mcsun!unido!mcshh!mwhh!markus

            "Oh freddled gruntbuggly ... thy micturations are to me /
     As plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee" -- Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: marcf@nexus.yorku.ca (Marc G Fournier)
Subject: two questions...both compiling kernel related
Organization: York University
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 07:21:50 GMT

Hi...

	Two potentially simple questions...

	1. If I want to make the kernel I recompile the kernel for
installing it onto a new system, how do I do that?  I'm presuming that
it is either disk a1 or a2 of the SLS dist, right?  Or is it something
I cannot do?

	2. A long one...

	What are the settings for the default SLS distribution kernel?
I just recompiled mine and tried to boot up with it...but it told me
that it could not read Superblock for MINIX-fs, EXT-fs or MSDOS, then
told me it could not mount root.  Those were the only three fs I compiled
into it...should I have compiled the /proc one too?

	On top of that...the kernel that I compiled into was almost 100k
less then the original.  Would it hurt anything if I compiled in all the
fs's as well as the SCSI support? (I know that I'm going to be getting a
SCSI Adaptec 1542 controller eventually)

Thanks...

Marc

P.S. It pays to read the fine print...I didn't mess up my original
     boot up diskette...I used a fresh diskette :)

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.windows.x,comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: fmn@nevada.edu (FRANK NEEDHAM)
Subject: xterm and xinitrc
Organization: University of Nevada System Computing Services
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 03:30:19 GMT

Hi all,

After being unsuccessfull with getting Xfree86 to run (even with the help of
a few helpfull replies from people on the net, thank you all very much,:-)),
it seems as if another post would be the direction to go.

For some reason that I have been unable to discover, when 'starx' is run , the 
only thing that is put down is the xclock icon and the wire frame of a window.
After this, the only thing I can do is kill the server. No input is accepted
from the mouse or keyboard.

I've looked at the faq and other readmes also. From what I know (very little,
obviously), everything proceeds smoothly until the end of .xinitrc is reached
and then the server won't talk to the xterm window. 

If this is what is happening, could someone point me the way out of this, or
give me some other ideas about what is happening?

thanks much,
-frank
From: kankkune@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Risto Kankkunen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: BUG of feature: cannot move `foo' accross file systems
Date: 31 Dec 92 17:23:05 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki, Department of Computer Science


Just noticed that mv refuses to move symlinks accross file systems. With
SunOS this isn't a problem, and I think POSIX would mind that, too.

Kernel 0.99pl0, mv something recent (jump tables 4.1).


-- 
me olemme maailma               tiet{v{tk| ne ett{ on jouluaika ollenkaan
From: 93jay@williams.edu (Jonathan Young)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: sls 99 user problems
Date: 23 Dec 1992 04:44:15 GMT
Organization: Williams College, Williamstown, MA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: hancock.cc.williams.edu

I am experiencing some problems with useradd in SLS Linux .99 (I'll
upgrade to patchlevel 1 soon but I don't think that's the problem)
The new users created do not seem to be fully "legitimate"

   When trying a whoami they get the message "cannot find username
for UID xxx"

   Only root seems to be able to use mail "username" without causing
a segmentation fault

   Minicom tells anyone other than root that "you don't exist go away"
and whenever root tries to use it, it complains that it cannot make a
default file and dies

   Ls -l does not correctly identify ownership for these new accounts
and reports them as owned by userid.

   Any ideas? I've currently got Linux as my only OS for break
(kermitting in from home) and I'd like to get it stable soon (I've
only had it since sunday so it's not too bad yet)

   I also tried to rebuild the kernel using the instructions in the
README in /usr/src/linux and it seemed to have several "file not
found" errors (and yes I did add the specified softlinks) and seemed
to choke on building the iso9whatever file systems even though I
specifically told it in make config that I didn't want SCSI or sound
(which also generated some kind of error message)


Jonathan Young
Williams College
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jrs@world.std.com (Rick Sladkey)
Subject: Re: getpwnami, 4.2 & login, perl ... (was Re: UUCP 103 (taylor))
Organization: The Internet
	<1992Dec26.155518.21255@r-node.gts.org>
	<1992Dec26.210230.3632@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 03:24:06 GMT

>>>>> On Sat, 26 Dec 92 21:02:30 GMT,
>>>>> amartell@nyx.cs.du.edu (Alex Martelli) said:

Alex> I wanted to use perl for the patching as I always did on other
Alex> Unices (with a -pi switch and a single s/libc.so.4/libc.so.O/;
Alex> instruction) BUT it doesn't work here: it truncates the input
Alex> file to the first binary 0 byte, so login becomes only 3 bytes
Alex> long... is it a bug in the fread() from stdio?  Apparently it's
Alex> the reading that makes perl truncate at the 0 byte (it works
Alex> with sysread then syswrite, though it's less convenient).

This is a bug in perl.  It occurs with Linux because Linux has
non-standard stdio (iostream) and perl mishandles null characters
in this situation.  Here is the patch I just sent to Larry.
-----
*** str.c.orig	Fri Jun 12 01:46:27 1992
--- str.c	Sat Dec 26 22:18:21 1992
***************
*** 863,873 ****
  	bp = buf;
  	while ((i = getc(fp)) != EOF && (*bp++ = i) != newline && bp < bpe) ;
  
- 	*bp = '\0';
  	if (append)
! 	    str_cat(str, buf);
  	else
! 	    str_set(str, buf);
  	if (i != EOF			/* joy */
  	    &&
  	    (i != newline
--- 863,872 ----
  	bp = buf;
  	while ((i = getc(fp)) != EOF && (*bp++ = i) != newline && bp < bpe) ;
  
  	if (append)
! 	    str_ncat(str, buf, bp - buf);
  	else
! 	    str_nset(str, buf, bp - buf);
  	if (i != EOF			/* joy */
  	    &&
  	    (i != newline
--
Rick Sladkey
jrs@world.std.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: qiwen@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Alexander Dong)
Subject: Yacc HELP ! Too many open files ?
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 16:16:11 GMT
Organization: TU Darmstadt
Keywords: Yacc, Bison

Hi !

I don't know why, yacc can not run ! It gives me a message:
too many open files ! But I haven't any open files !
What's wrong ?

So I used a bison an a PC, I have tried to compile the *.c File unter 
Linux, but GCC could not find _yyerror. Perhaps I need any *.lib more.
But how can I get them ?

Thanks very much for your help !

Alexander
qiwen@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: cdillon@muse.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Craig Dillon)
Subject: Short filenames under Linux
Keywords: The number fourteen
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 03:53:22 GMT

I recently installed Linux and Xfree86 and Tex and was really happy and
getting all keen to do some serious work when I discovered that when I
tried to port our labs image processing library to Linux, all my filenames
were truncated to 14 characters.

Now, I know that there is one standard form of Un*x that has 14 character
filenames - but lets face it - who uses it and is happy? So I know I can't
complain - I'm not. Linux (apart from the filename length) is great, but I
do have the following questions:

(1)	Can the restrictions on the filename length be made a little more
	obvious than an obscure reference on about page 30 of the FAQ?
	Just so that people like me don't get into Linux with the wrong
	ideas about what it can do.

(2)	Does anyone know how to get around the problem? I looked into the
	kernel source, but not being knowledgeable on these things, I can't
	be sure that it would be an easy change or not. I presume not,
	otherwise other people would have done it already. Any clues?

Anyway, I have written a program which automatically ports code to Linux
(just the filename problem, not other conversion difficulties :) ) by
making unique shorter filenames, modifying makefiles, executable names,
source files and include files. Works reasonably well, but it is not 100%
guaranteed. If there is enough interest, I'll tidy it up and make it
public domain.

Cheers,
Craig.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: dinn@ug.cs.dal.ca (Michael 'Moose' Dinn)
Subject: Wanted: a tar.Z of someone's /usr/lib/uucp/* files.
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 05:28:46 GMT


Since I can't seem to get UUCP to sit up and do ANYTHING, I figure someone
else's config files that work will be the next best thing. I just edit
system names and phone numbers and go from there.

Anyone want to send me their config files?

--
 Michael Dinn, CS Student * dinn@ug.cs.dal.ca * Use your modem! (902) 461-4773
 "make lots of money",  "enjoy the work",  "operate within the law":  choose 2
From: probreak@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: ps in linux .99p1 broken?
Date: 25 Dec 1992 23:04:32 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

ccasted@prism.gatech.EDU (Edward Deering Boykin) writes:


> just got Linux patch 1 ver .99 compiloed on my machine. I have a 66mhz 486
>with 8meg ram and local bus hard drive. I have a 64 meg linux partition
>and a 15 meg swap.
>It only took me 7 minutes to compile! That was with no scsi no fpu emulation no ext-fs and all elese default. I also included the sound kit stuff.
>Anyway once I rebooted with the new Image ps does not work. I get this error msg:
>lseek kmem: unknown error 207994200

>buh?
>also my xload form Xfree861.1 shows a continuous bar from top to bottomeven with
>just the server running. no windows no nothing running. 
>Any ideas?

>Later.....
>Ed 
>ccasted@prism.gatech.edu

You need to do the following command each time you recompile your kernel to
update the information in the database.

ps -U /usr/src/linux/tools/system

Replace the /usr/src with the prefix to where you installed the linux source.

This will update the file /etc/psdatabase with the necessary information to
run ps properly. Or, you could install perl and get the ps scripts someone
posted a while back. They should allways work from now on.

James
From: Randy.Edwards@f60.n128.z1.fidonet.org (Randy Edwards)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Ctrl-Alt-Del
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 14:35:02 -0800

To: danubius@halcyon.com (Joseph R. Pannon) 
 JR> disabling it, the reboot works as advertised.  Now I just hope that

 JR> the disabled shadowing won't affect adversely my DOS and OS2/2
speeds. 
 
   It won't effect speeds in OS/2, as it copies the BIOS to RAM itself 
to use.  And as for DOS, well, who cares...  :-) 
. 
Randy 
 
 
... OFFLINE 1.44 * A closed mind is a wonderful thing to lose. 

 * Origin: The Programmers Playhouse (1:128/60)
From: juh@qt.IPA.FhG.de (Juergen Henke)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Toshiba CD-ROM and linux?
Date: 24 Dec 92 14:30:49
Organization: Fraunhofer Inst. f. Manufact. Engineering a. Automation,
	Stuttgart, Germany
NNTP-Posting-Host: lazy.qt.ipa.fhg.de
In-reply-to: smitty@essnj1.essnjay.com's message of Sun, 20 Dec 1992 15:23:45 GMT

>>>>> On Sun, 20 Dec 1992 15:23:45 GMT, smitty@essnj1.essnjay.com (Hibbard T. Smith JR) said:

smitty> I'm using a Toshiba XM-3301TA CD-ROM (packaged for external use by CD
smitty> Technology) on an Adaptec 1542 host adapter.  This combination works fine
smitty> with DOS-5, Windows 3.1, Windows NT, and ISC unix 3.0.  When I try to
smitty> use it with linux, I'm unable to mount the CD.  I get a "CD-ROM I/O error
smitty> dev 0b00 sector 64".  The message goes on to say that it failed reading the 
smitty> superblock at iso_blknum 16.

I've seen the same effect with a DEC RRD42 on an Adaptec 1542B. The CD-ROM
is recognized on startup. (May be DEC resells Toshiba CD-ROMs ?).


Merry Christmas !

Juergen

--
_________________________________________________________________________
Juergen Henke, e-mail juh@IPA.FhG.de, PSI-mail PSI%4505016002::JUH_IPA
Fraunhofer-Institut f. Produktionstechnik u. Automatisierung
Nobelstrasse 12, D-7000 Stuttgart 80
(ATK-mail and MIME-mail welcome)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: tgc@world.std.com (Terry Carlin)
Subject: Future Domain TMC-886 and CDROM's
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 15:57:12 GMT

I am trying to make my Future Domain TMC-886 work with the seagate
driver.
I have Toshiba CDROM which I am trying to use.  The driver cannot find
the CDROM.  I use the OVERRIDE=0xc8000 'cause I don't want the SCSI
bios involved.  I also use int 10 which I have changed in seagate.c.
I have linux0.99.pl2 and have hard coded the controller_type to FD.
I turned debugging on in seagate.c.  Of course, the messages fly on by
and I haven't a clue what is going on.  
Does some one out there have any idea how to slow down or pause the
printk's that are coming out on the console??  Or better yet, catch
them on a file or printer???  

Thanks




-- 
Terry Carlin
tgc@world.std.com
From: ninja@willard.UUCP (Sonic Druid)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Hardware requirements for running/installing Linux
Date: 20 Dec 92 23:43:19 GMT
Organization: Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814


 
 I'm looking for information about the hardware requirements
for the Linux systems in terms of an IBM PC computer....
 

-- 
ninja@willard.UUCP (Sonic Druid)
gatech!vdbsan!willard!ninja
emory!uumind!willard!ninja
Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814