From: vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.censorship,alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: HOLOCAUST MYTHS
Date: 10 Apr 92 07:45:02 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.050611.15843@midway.uchicago.edu>, gross@befvax.uchicago.edu writes:
> In article <gc0wiB1w164w@b-cpu.UUCP>, pfaust@b-cpu.UUCP (Pete Faust) writes:
>>
> 
> Pete Faust again posts his $50,000 offer.
> 
>>Don't continue to lie and call names.  Fulfill one of the
>>rerquirements and you will receive the $50,000.00.  This is
>>no idle offer.
>> 
>>Pete Faust
>>Institute for Relearning
> 
> Mr Faust.
> Please tell me your real name, phone number, address.  I'll need this
> information when I serve you court papers.  And if you refuse
> to cooperate, realize that your system manager and anyone who knows
> this information can be subpeonad and named as co-defendants, regardless
> of what the disclaimer in the sig file says.
>   

I apologize to Usenet for reposting pfaust garbage but I would like to
tell readers of a recent event in my life. About a month ago my wife
was run into by some maniac trying to kill himself. He barrelled into
the intersection at about 50-70 mph and hit my wife's car. She spun
around and hit a semi! Fortunately, she was wearing a seat belt and
miraculously escaped with a black eye and a few bruises! I do 
fear that she has severe wiplash and this is becoming a problem already...

Now the case...

The bozo that hit her had *no insurance*. Fortunately we had uninsured
motorist coverage. But, who ultimately pays? This asshole
survived his attack (Olds Delta 88 vs Plymouth Sundance!), but he
pays no loss except for his loss of a drivers license. Our insurnce
company is going to have to eventually cost up a 20-50k to pay
damages (which are real btw! - it could be worse)....

Doesn't this sound similar to what this '$50,000' reward is all about.
A high speed hit from behind by an uninsured motorist? Is there a 
simlarity? Who ultimately pats the cost?

-Garrett

(hit 'n' now as the rest is bcpu inspired debate which you have already
read I am sure...)




>>     As I have been misquoted again, the $50,000.00 Offer
>>will be posted again.
>   
>><                   $50,000.00 OFFER
>> 
>>< There is a standing offer of $50,000.00 to one who
>>< can prove or arrange any one of the following:
> 
>>he last thing the
>>Exterminationists want is the Nitty-Gritty of the Gassings
>>Hoax made public.                        
> 
> The last thing the handful of white-supremicist posting propaganda
> from B-CPU want made public is their names because they are afraid
> of being sued.
> 
>>Don't be fooled.  Mermelstein lost in his second court
>>appearance, nullifying the First Farce.  
> This is just false.  The later trial did not overrule any of the
> previous rulings.  Here is the previous ruling.
> 
> *****  A  *****  A  *****  A  *****  A  *****  A  *****  A  *****  A  *****
> 
> 
> 		 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
> 		       FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
> 
> MEL MERMELSTEIN.                )    No. C 356 542
>          Plaintiff,             )
> vs.                             )    JUDGMENT
>                                 )
> INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL        )
> REVIEW, et al.                  )
>          Defendants.            )
> 
>      Pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment executed on July 22,
> 1985, the Court renders the following judgment:
> 
>     1.  Defendants LIBERTY LOBBY, WILLIS CARTO, ELISABETH CARTO, LEGION FOR
> SURVIVAL OF FREEDOM, INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW, and NOONTIDE PRESS,
> and each of them, are jointly and severally liable to plaintiff MEL
> MERMELSTEIN for the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00),
> reduced to the sum of Ninety Thousand Dollars ($90,000.00) payable as
> follows:
>        (a) Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) on August 1, 1985, and
> delivered to the law offices of ALLRED, MAROKO, GOLDBERG & RIBAKOFF;
>        (b)  Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) on September 1, 1985;
>        (c)  Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) on October 1, 1985.
>     2.  Should any of the installments not be made by the defendants against
> whom judgment herein is entered within the time period provided, plaintiff,
> at his sole option and discretion, shall have the following options:
>        (a) To rescind the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and proceed to
> trial and any payments received by plaintiff to that date from defendants
> shall not be returned to said defendants; or
>        (b) Plaintiff may request entry of Judgment against each of said
> defendants, jointly or severally, in the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand
> Dollars ($150,000.00).
>     3.  Defendants LIBERTY LOBBY, WILLIS CARTO, ELISABETH CARTO, LEGION FOR
> SURVIVAL OF FREEDOM, INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW, and NOONTIDE PRESS,
> shall issue and execute, by a duly authorized representative, a Letter of
> Apology to Mel Mermelstein, as follows:
>   "Each of the answering defendants do hereby officially and formally
>   apologize to Mr. Mel Mermelstein, a survivor of Auschwitz-Birkenau and
>   Buchenwald, and all other survivors of Auschwitz for the pain, anguish and
>   suffering he and all other Auschwitz survivors have sustained relating to
>   the $50,000 reward offer for proof that "Jews were gassed in gas chambers at
>   Auschwitz".
> 
> DATED: AUG 5, 1985
> 
>                                           ROBERT A. WENKE, JUDGE
>                                           SUPERIOR COURT
> 
> APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:
> 
> G. G. BAUMEN
> Attorney for Defendants
> INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW,
> LEGION FOR SURVIVAL OF FREEDOM,
> ELISABETH CARTO and NOONTIDE PRESS
> 
> VON ESCH & ASSOCIATES
> Attorneys for Defendants
> LIBERTY LOBBY and WILLIS CARTO
> 
> ***************************************************
> 
>  
> Leon Gross
> I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV.
Newsgroups: alt.activism,talk.politics.misc