From: 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
Subject: Re: Thoughts/Spoilers on 12/11 Show
Date: 11 Dec 1992 18:31:48 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 9073hammesm@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

    [Good comment and replies deleted]
>
>>3.  Rox N Tommy- Well, now I can see why Rox is so hestitant to make it
>>anything besides business, after all she's been through before with the other
>>guys in her life.  I still think it's sleazy.
>
>I just don't care about this storyline at all.  I like both characters, and
>I probably wouldn't have minded a relationship *developing*, but this was
>totally out of the blue... and in soap land, one failed marriage and one
>failed relationship is NOTHING.  I don't see how she's been through anything
>that awful with men, compared to, say, Gwen or Abby or Grace.
>

I found Roxanne annoying on this episode. One reason she picked Tommy is 
because he's a nice guy who gets involved in things.  He is also not a 
sleep-around like Arnie--it was inevitable that he'd start to care. 


>>4.  My husband had already mentioned how Martinez was always around when the
>>presents arrive, and was around during the garage scene, so he had already
>>guessed Martinez to be the stalker.   I still say it's just too obvious.  But
>>that comment he made to her 'You're the fairest of them all'....could it be
>>that his wife's death has made him really nuts?  He recognized that the heart
>>was probably an animal's, like the ones in his brother's med school.  I didn't
>>think Ann was very sensitive either.  In fact, why isn't there a security
>>person looking after her and the firm, if there is obviously some major
>>stalking going on?
>

But wasn't he in the elevator of the parking garage?  It seems very unlikely
that he'd skulk around carrying Lucy, then somehow get into the elevator just
at the moment Gwen called it.


>I don't think it's Daniel (A Martinez).  I agree with you that it's too
>obvious; she jumped to that conclusion right away.  Logistically speaking,
>I doubt they'd bring a big-name soap actor onto the show, just to have him
>be a psycho and get rid of him.  He's the only one who would have a REASON
>to have fairy-tale books, given that he has a baby. He also hasn't known
>her that long, and she's practically thrown herself at him; why bother stalking
>her?  (Not that psychos make a lot of sense.) 


I don't think it's Daniel for the same reason.  

I have to admit I'm stumped.  



>>9.  Stuart and the gun-  Well, Stuart's in a jam now.  There were some
>>beautiful dogs in that group!  I thought he was going to pull money out...I
>>never figured he'd pull out a gun to get Lincoln out!!!  And is that really how
>>dog pounds work?  
>
>And this was the dumbest of all.  Stuart's "Born Free" act was just ridiculous.
>They're really having Stuart go around the bend.  I don't think the pound works
>like that, but even if that was plausible, I think the lawyer act probably
>would have worked.  If not; pulling a gun after you've given someone your card
>is really dumb.  And bringing all the dogs back to the firm? Sheesh.
>

One thing I wondered about--why would the pound let Benny adopt a pet but not
take Lincoln?  He (Lincoln, not Benny) didn't have a tag, so if some "little
girl" walked in and said he was hers, why would they let her have him and not
Benny?  I know, I know, dramatic license, but this just seemed contrived.


>
>I'm about to give up; not one trial, and the rest of the threads seem pretty
>useless.  Will Roxanne conceive?  Will she and Tommy have a relationship?
>Will Stuart get his memory back?  Who is stalking Gwen?  Will Arnie impress
>his mogul?
>
>WHO CARES???  Give me Law & Order any day.
>

I hate to admit it, but I'm getting curious as to who the stalker is. :-)

Mary H.