HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: r0th@ellis.uchicago.edu (Dr. Samuel Conway)
Subject: Re: Asimov lost
Reply-To: r0th@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 21:23:11 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.193843.5816@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> sdh5@po.CWRU.Edu (Scott D. Hurley) writes:

>Isaac Asimov died this morning , April 6, 1992 A.D.
>Who's left?

Andre Norton?

----
Dr. Samuel Conway         *  "If the guest isn't singing, 'Oh What a Beautiful
Dept. of Chemistry        *  Morning' I don't immediately think, 'Oh, there's
University of Chicago     *  another one snuffed it in the night!'  Another
r0th@ellis.uchicago.edu   *  name in the Fawlty Towers book of Remembrance.
++(on-call avian medic)++ *  I mean, this is a hotel, not the Burma Railway!"

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: csmith@onetouch.COM (Craig Smith)
Subject: Re: Star Wars canon stuff. Stop it please
Organization: MCS/OneTouch, Inc.
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 20:01:16 GMT

wiml@milton.u.washington.edu (William Lewis) writes:

>In article <1992Mar31.185734.16864@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> mulac@alliant1.lerc.nasa.gov (Richard Mulac) writes:
>>  I don't know if "canon" even means anything when it comes to star wars.
>>For example, a few posts back someone stated how SW has Luke being 20
>>years old and Leia being 18 years old.  In ROTJ Luke and Leia are twins
>>born at the same time.  

>   Aha! The Twins Paradox! 

>  =6) =6) =6)

>   No, really ... Leia spent four years in a sublight transport
>at one point, and is now younger than Luke. (How do I know? Well, 
>I found these old letters in my attic ... seems Leia's highschool
>boyfriend knew my great^n-aunt ... or something. _Trust_ me!)

I do not remember any reference to ages in SW, however, Leia never mentioned
that her "father" on Alderan was an adopted father (In which case, is she
really a princess?).

-- 
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::Craig Smith                                             csmith@onetouch.COM::
::Columbus, OH                                      ...!uunet!onetouch!csmith::
::"Life is a fulltime occupation."--Gene Kalman                              ::
From: jess%miracle@merk.com (Shi'nayne)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Mistake at beginning of T2
Date: 6 Apr 92 17:05:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: miracle.VZJTiB2w164w
Organization: Miracle Computer Consultants

cleggp@aix.rpi.edu (Paul Jason Clegg) writes:

> In article <1992Apr6.023536.12315@reed.edu> bcushman@lust.reed.edu (Ben Cushm
> >	I have a quick question.  Was the T1000 organic?  If not, how  
> >could he be temporally diplaced.  I understood that the reason why no  
> >weapons or clothes could be brought back from the future was that no  
> >non-living stuff can be displaced (unless it was wrapped in living  
> >tissue).  However, the T1000 seemed to be made entirely of liquid metal  
> >(that is, no living tissue).  Is there an explanation for this apparent  
> >discrepancy?
> 
> I haven't been following any of the Terminator threads, but I was wondering
> this:  In T1, when they talk about how the time travel only allows organics,
> do they make any <specific> comments about the transportee being "alive", or
> just "organic"?  Because "organic" chemistry basically means that carbon is
> somewhere in the chemical makeup.  If this is the case, then simply saying
> that the T1000 has a carbon based structure is enough to allow it passage,
> but if this is the case, why not bring back weapons made of graphite-aluminum
> alloys?  Or some sort of carbon-based armor or clothing?
> 
> ...Paul
> 
> |FQT 1.10| ine.  This is a moebius tagline.  This is a moebius tagl

It is also mentioned in the first movie, I believe, that the time travel
machine was destroyed after Reese came through it.  So another one must
have been built that would allow non-organic material through it???

Warrior Queen


Vampire Hunters Inc.
jess%miracle@merk.com
If you have vampire problems, call!!  We'll
stake your problem right through the heart!!
From: seawasp+@pitt.edu (Ryk E Spoor)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Could Batman beat the T-1000?
Keywords: Buford, pass me that extra straightjacket
Date: 10 Apr 92 03:38:39 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <kw4th##@rpi.edu> cleggp@aix.rpi.edu (Paul Jason Clegg) writes:
>In article <19944@castle.ed.ac.uk> asr@castle.ed.ac.uk (Angus "Fluffy" Rae) writes:
>>>In article <1992Apr9.005014.22428@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>, egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes...
>>"Oh goody! My Illidium Pew-36 Explosive Space Modulator"

>Minor Point:  I think it was "Plutonium Pu-238 Explosive Space Modulator".

	Nope. _Alludium *Q*-36 Explosive Space Modulator_.

>How about Robocop vs. Batman?  Both are heros/vigilantes...

	Batman. Robo, tough as he is, has no imagination compared to Bats.
Batman would glitch him up 72 different ways.

                                 Sea Wasp
                                   /^\
                                   ;;;
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: thogek@seismo.gps.caltech.edu (Thomas Kiefer)
Subject: Re: Could Batman beat the T-1000?
Keywords: Buford, pass me that extra straightjacket
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 15:47:14 GMT


From mnemosyn.1992Apr9.000948.19138 ahawks@isis.cs.du.edu (andy)
>|    Batman vs. the T-1000....who would win??
>
>Ob. sci-fi:
>Who would win:  Darth Vader or the alien guy in the Bugs Bunny cartoons?


Marvin the Martian!!  ("At last, after two thousand years,...")

                  +-----------------------------------+
                  |   thogek@seismo.gps.caltech.edu   |
                  +-----------------------------------+
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: gberigan@cse.unl.edu (Life...)
Subject: Re: Mistake at beginning of T2
Organization: Ursa Minor Beta, 402-476-8047 @ 2400
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 18:20:52 GMT

bcushman@lust.reed.edu (Ben Cushman) writes:

>Hi folks--
>
> I have a quick question.  Was the T1000 organic?  If not, how  
>could he be temporally diplaced.  I understood that the reason why no  
>weapons or clothes could be brought back from the future was that no  
>non-living stuff can be displaced (unless it was wrapped in living  
>tissue).  However, the T1000 seemed to be made entirely of liquid metal  
>(that is, no living tissue).  Is there an explanation for this apparent  
>discrepancy?

Oh no, not again!

"Something about the field generated by a living organism..."

Does something have to be composed of organic elements to be alive?
C'mon, it's science fiction!

>     Ben Cushman
>     Reed College

--
  ///   ____   \\\       | CAUTION:
  | |/ /    \ \| |       | Avoid eye contact.  In case of contact, flush
   \\_|\____/|_//        | mind for 15 minutes.  See a psychiatrist if
       \_)\\/            | irritation persists.  Not to be taken
gberigan `-' cse.unl.edu | seriously.  Keep out of sight of children.
From: tron1@tronsbox.UUCP (Kenneth Jamieson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Could Batman beat the T-1000?
Keywords: Buford, pass me that extra straightjacket
Date: 10 Apr 92 14:21:08 GMT
Organization: Xanadu Enterprises Inc.

In article <1992Apr9.072413.4609@acsu.buffalo.edu> v562f9vy@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Wolverine) writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.005014.22428@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>, egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes...
>>In article <1992Apr9.000948.19138@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> ahawks@isis.cs.du.edu (andy) writes:
>>>
>>>Ob. sci-fi:
>>>Who would win:  Darth Vader or the alien guy in the Bugs Bunny cartoons?
>> 
>>Why, the Martian, of course!  He's got that disintergrating gun, after
>>all!
>
>
>Who would win?  Debbie Gibson or Tiffany?  Who's on First?
>
>                           Wolverine

	I don't know - but I know some folks that would pay money to
watch the fight!

	:-)




-- 

+--[ Xanadu Enterprises Inc. Lingerie, Consulting, RPG's and ANIME ]-+.sign
|  Please send email for detailed product or catalogue information!  |ature
|             Ken Jamieson: uunet!tronsbox.xei.com!tron1             |Virus
|---NONE of the opinions represented here are endorsed by anybody!---|V3.2
|              Original contents are Copyright (c)1992               |1992!
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: mulac@alliant1.lerc.nasa.gov (Richard Mulac)
Subject: Re: Skywalkers' bogus heritages
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 17:15:18 GMT

From the book STAR WARS by George Lucas ...

  "How," he asked slowly, "did my father die?"

  Kenobi hesitated, and Luke sensed that the old man had no wish to
talk about this particular matter.  Unlike Owen Lars, however,
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Kenobi was unable to take refuge in a comfortable lie. 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  "He was betrayed and murdered," Kenobi declared solmenly, "by a
very young Jedi named Darth Vader."  He was not looking at Luke.
"A boy I was training.  One of my brightest disciples...one of my
greatest failures."

-- 
Richard Mulac                                     mulac@alliant1.lerc.nasa.gov
NASA Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Road, MS 5-9, Cleveland, OH  44135
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Well, judging by his outlandish attire, he's some sort | These pontifications
of free-thinking anarchist." - Charles Montgomery Burns |      are my own!
From: cmgeorg@eos.ncsu.edu (CHRIS MICH GEORGOULIAS)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Kenner Star Wars:where's yak face?????
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:26:35 GMT
Reply-To: cmgeorg@eos.ncsu.edu (CHRIS MICH GEORGOULIAS)
Organization: Project EOS - North Carolina State University

Well, being an avid Star Wars toy collector I just happen to know that
you might
be able to get a Yak Face from "The Intergalactic Trading Post". They're
based 
in Florida and you can probably find the number in the ads of some
science
fiction mags or related sources.  The last time I looked, the going
price was
$150 on the card.  Of course with all the hype it could be more.  This
guy at
a toy show in my area sold a loose one for $75 just minutes before I
arrived
So, I've never actually seen one in person.  

From what I understand, this figure was only released in Australia.  That's 
probably why you are having trouble finding it.

If anyone has a good source I'd be interested as well, since it's the only one
I'm lacking (aside from the rocket launching Boba Fett, but that's another 
story...)

If anyone has an extra $1200 laying around I know a guy who will sell you
"General Koong," one of the prototype Driods figures.

This guy actually has nearly ALL the prototype Driods and Ewoks cartoon
figures.
I guess it's handy living only 15 minutes from Kenner and having some
good
connections.



Chris Georgoulias
cmgeorg@eos.ncsu.edu

"All I need is the drill, the hedgeclippers, and some ordinary household
bleach"
                         -Vyvian  -The Young Ones
From: tsmith@SPARTA.SPARTACUS.COM (Tim Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: SF-LOVERS Digest   V17 #163
Date: 14 Apr 92 12:30:12 GMT

Do you know howw I can unsubscribe to the list?

Thanks,

Tim
From: thogek@seismo.gps.caltech.edu (Thomas Kiefer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Mistake at beginning of T2
Date: 6 Apr 92 22:39:40 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

From <VZJTiB2w164w@miracle.com> jess%miracle@merk.com (Shi'nayne):
>It is also mentioned in the first movie, I believe, that the time travel
>machine was destroyed after Reese came through it.  So another one must
>have been built that would allow non-organic material through it???

Just an extra thought: Reese cannot KNOW whether the time machine he came
through was destroyed or not.  After he passed through, he couldn't look
back to check.  Perhaps the humans discovered the need to send another
back after they sent Reese, but before they destroyed it.  Or, maybe they
didn't tell Reese about the second one, so he couldn't mess anything up
by knowing about it.

I am curious as to how the T-1000 got through.  The "enclosed by organic
shell that burned off" off is interesting, but how come Arnie's didn't
burn off.  (Okay, maybe they're not quite the same...)  Maybe the humans
built/found another one?  Maybe there's more to the T-1000 structure than
liquid metal?...

                  +-----------------------------------+
                  |   thogek@seismo.gps.caltech.edu   |
                  +-----------------------------------+
From: v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: x vs. x comparisons
Date: 11 Apr 92 22:44:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr11.161043.1@hamp.hampshire.edu>, ckeroack@hamp.hampshire.edu writes...
> 
>		This isn't the first time I've seen this sort of discussion and
>it certainly won't be the last.. perhaps someone could create a newsgroup
>specifically for it? 
>		
>		alt.speculation.hero.combat
>		
>		A news group devoted solely to the discussion of which hero or
>entity or organization from any series or genre could trash another. Perfect
>for the Star Wars vs. Star Trek type of things. Could embrace a wide variety of
>different mythological or fictional characters..
> 
>		Zeus vs. Christ
>		Justice League America vs. the stock gladiators from "American
>Gladiators"
>		one of the 3 Musketeers vs. the Highlander
>		Darth Vader vs. Professor Xavier
> 
>		and so forth ad nauseam.
> 
>						Chris
>						ckeroack@hamp.hampshire.edu


       Seconded strongly!  Let's get the RFD and the postings on 
       alt.config going...  



          ^Hot Damn, That Pie Was Good!^
                     Common Phrases Heard at
                     RR Diner #32.

          ^Scott Gorcey, v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu^
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: gberigan@cse.unl.edu (Life...)
Subject: Re: Mistake at beginning of T2
Organization: Ursa Minor Beta, 402-476-8047 @ 2400
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 18:51:22 GMT

ratinox@splinter.coe.northeastern.edu (Stainless Steel Rat) writes:

>Come to think of it, Reese is just plain wrong. Evidence to wit: every time
>the temporal displacement device is used, a spherical area in the target
>time frame is swapped with whatever is in the device, organic or otherwise.
>Support: visuals in both movies, where parts of a dumpster, semi-trailer,
>pavement, etc., vanish from the ``now'' of the movies. Secondary support
>from the novelization of T2, when Reese is sent back: ``Oddly, in its place
>was a sphere filled with whirling debris: crushed beer cans, faded yellow
>newspapers, dated 1984, and a slice of dumpster, filled with garbage from
>that year.'' Obviously, *anything* may be displaced, not just living
>things. Reese appeared in 1984 buck naked because he left 2029 in that
>state :-).

I disagree.  It may be that only living things can be sent back in time,
but anything can come forward.  If you say Reese is wrong, and inorganic
material can be sent back in time, why didn't SkyNet know this and do so
itself?  It certainly should know how it works, and the limitations.

>Richard Pieri, Northeastern's Stainless Steel Rat/   | /| / /   | The Worlds
>Internet: ratinox@splinter.coe.northeastern.edu /__  |/ |/ / /| | Welfare Works
>    UUCP: ...!northeastern.edu!splinter!ratinox/   | /| / / / | | Association:
>  BITNET: UA_RLP@NUHUB{.BITNET}               /__  |/ |/ / /  | | I will solve

--
  ///   ____   \\\       | CAUTION:
  | |/ /    \ \| |       | Avoid eye contact.  In case of contact, flush
   \\_|\____/|_//        | mind for 15 minutes.  See a psychiatrist if
       \_)\\/            | irritation persists.  Not to be taken
gberigan `-' cse.unl.edu | seriously.  Keep out of sight of children.
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Batman vs. Spiderman
Date: 14 Apr 92 01:36:45 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <1992Apr13.184324.10455@uwm.edu> craiga@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Craig R Albrechtson) writes:
>In article <1992Apr13.051631.27302@latcs1.lat.oz.au> agapow@latcs1.lat.oz.au (paul-michael agapow) writes:

>>
>>What i really want to know is, if the Ewoks fought the Smurfs, who would
>>win? Like while the Ewoks are hardened combat veterans, and might have a
>>few ATTs still hanging around, the Smurfs have magic and the wisdom of
>>Grandpa Smurf. And of course they could always distract the ewoks with
>>Smurfette and make a flanking attack. But the Ewoks could probably
>>convince the Care-Bears to join their side which would even up the fight.
>>i'm not sure if ET would join the Smurf side, he/it might hire him/itself
>>out as a mercenary to either side, and since neither side has a monetary
>>system, this would present problems. 
>>
>>So what do you think?
>>

Smurfs, of course!  In all they're battles with Gargamel, did they
EVER take casualties?  I mean, they whacked him bad.  And Azrael, too!
Meanwhile, the many Ewoks came to resemble singed versions of those
bunny slippers (that's something I'd like to see: singed Ewok slippers),
and they only won because of a secret weapon Lucas never showed:
they went and got that giant joint from Mel Brook's History of the
World, Part I, and you know those Imperials.  They can't breathe
in them suits.  This won't work with the Smurfs!  They're immune
to drugs.

Imagine going up to some guy high on acid, and telling him Smurfs
are sneaking up on him.

>You want to know what I think...
>
>
>AAARRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH...........................what the hell is
>this geekworld international.  These stupid x vs y threads are
>driving me nuts.
>
>What I propose is that we create a thread on the horrible things
>we could do to the people who continue to post on this.
>
>Here are my suggestions
>
>-Take one of those geekoids, strip him/her naked , tie them up 
>and throw them head first in to the mosh pit at a janes addiction
>concert. 
>
>-Take one of those geeks and tie about 100 cats to their body
>and throw them into a swimming pool.
>
>At least that is what I would like to do to one of those
>geeks that keep posting on these stupid threads if I could 
>get my hands on them.

What I'd like to see is a battle between folks with a highly
refined sense of humor and folks without.  Who'd win?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Asimov lost
From: jgreen@zeus.calpoly.edu (James T. Green)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 08:46:09 GMT
Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

r0th@midway.uchicago.edu speakith unto us:
>In article <1992Apr6.193843.5816@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> sdh5@po.CWRU.Edu (Scott D. Hurley) writes:
>
>>Isaac Asimov died this morning , April 6, 1992 A.D.
>>Who's left?
>

Arthur C. Clarke of the infamous Asimov/Clarke Axis.  The two of
them had a agreement that each was to acknowledge the other
as the SECOND best science fiction writer.  I would bet that 
ACC will probably make some kind of public statement.  If anyone 
sees it, please post it.


/~~~(-: James T. Green :-)~~~~(-: jgreen@eros.calpoly.edu :-)~~~\ 
|                                                               |
|    Slogans of two generations:  1972:  Question Authority!    |
|                                 1992:  Why Ask Why?           |
From: DCC117@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: BATMAN VS. NIRVANA
Date: 12 Apr 92 23:07:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: psuvm.92103.190718DCC117
Organization: Penn State University


 Hmmm.... That could be an interesting match-up. However, if Batman got
into trouble, he could always use devices such as the Bat-Alternative-
Band-Eraser or the Bat-Enemy-Hair-Color-Stabilizer or the Bat-Shield-
Protecting-Wearer-From-Cheap-Instruments. Possibly, the plot could be
really interesting if a Nirvanacave were introduced. Kurt could drive
the Nirvanamobile into the side of a hill, and all of a sudden they would
be in an abandoned high school gymnasium.
                                                       --THARIZDUN

***********************************************************************
    "Observe the view as your master sees it." - fake Tharizdun
***********************************************************************
From: rskirsky@athena.qualcomm.com (Ray Skirsky)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Ending of ALIENS...
Date: 10 Apr 92 06:57:50 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.sf.movies
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA

In article <1992Apr6.013511.10366@unlinfo.unl.edu> gberigan@cse.unl.edu (Life...) writes:
>fist@iscp.Bellcore.COM (Richard Pierson) writes:
>
>>First off I don't think the company could have programmed
>>a NAVY (Marine corps) ship to do something not in the orders.
>>I get the impression from the book and movie that "Bug Hunts"
>>are a somewhat common occurrance in the Colonial Marines.
>
>They are using the term "bug hunt" in the sense of computers and other
>electronics.  "Is this going to be a stand-up fight [battle], sir, or
>another bug hunt [debugging]?"  It is quite possible that Hudson didn't
>know what a "xenomorph" was.
>
I Think you got this one wrong,  a stand-up fight is against another sentient
enemy, e.g. Kzin, bug hunts are vermin control.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: malinon@iastate.edu (Ramon C Redondo)
Subject: Re: Could Batman beat the T-1000?
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 05:46:29 GMT

In <1992Apr8.224430.28136@news2.cis.umn.edu> alberti@mudhoney.micro.umn.edu (Albatross) writes:

>In <rauser.702762257@sfu.ca> rauser@fraser.sfu.ca (Richard John Rauser) 
>writes:
>>   Batman vs. the T-1000....who would win??

>Batman, of course.  He's the hero.  What, you don't know how these things 
>work?               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^
Hero's don't ALWAYS win, haven't you ever seen the short film, _Bambi_vs_
Godzilla_?  Of course, I can see where you'd think that Godzilla was the 
hero...     


|> /\/\
Dark Malinon


>--
>Bob Alberti: Computer & Information Services U of MN   |aka: Albatross| Unitar-
>Internet   : alberti@boombox.micro.umn.edu             |Metropolis BBS| ian/
>Disclaimer : My employer does not mean what I say.     |(612) 721-1870| Univer-
>Ingredients: 30% header, 30% quote, 10% comment, 30% cutesy signature.| salist!
-- 
| 'If you strike me down, I will become | 'If you destroy this temple, I will |
|  more powerful than you can POSSIBLY  |  rebuild it in three days.'         |
|  imagine!' - Ben Kenobi, _Star_Wars_  |  - Jesus Christ, _The_New_Testament_|

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: gberigan@cse.unl.edu (Life...)
Subject: Re: Mistake at beginning of T2
Organization: Ursa Minor Beta, 402-476-8047 @ 2400
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 18:53:17 GMT

emeu08@castle.ed.ac.uk (ME3 Student) writes:

>Anyway I always thought that it was a different type of time machine that 
>was used in the second film.

More likely a bigger budget.  Think Klingons.

> Donald

--
  ///   ____   \\\       | CAUTION:
  | |/ /    \ \| |       | Avoid eye contact.  In case of contact, flush
   \\_|\____/|_//        | mind for 15 minutes.  See a psychiatrist if
       \_)\\/            | irritation persists.  Not to be taken
gberigan `-' cse.unl.edu | seriously.  Keep out of sight of children.