From: roby@chopin.udel.edu (Scott W Roby)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: PatricKKK's head has gone back up his ass again (was Re: Who was "Dennis Hall"?)
Date: 27 Aug 92 02:41:25 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware


  [Initials precede arrows in text:  SC=Chaney, PH= Humphrey, SR=Roby]

In article <1992Aug25.215224.25822@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>In article <Bt9vBM.2on@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>>In article <Bt98Ev.Bp9@news.udel.edu> roby@chopin.udel.edu (Scott W Roby) writes:
>>>In article <1684554D.HUMPHRY@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU> HUMPHRY@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU (Patrick Humphrey) writes:
>>>>In article <1992Aug16.003415.17098@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>>> 

  [Here is where, Chaney, responding to an earlier Patrick post, chose to 
   use my name instead.  He is stupidly trying to mixup my name with 
   Patrick's as a lame attempt to mimic my linking his name to that of 
   the fictitious "Dennis Hall" (through careful exposition of the facts).]

  [Bottomline: My name was introduced into this thread by Chaney for 
   no good reason.]

SC>>>>>                Shhh, Scott.
SC>>>>>                We know you're posting as Pat Harumphrey because
SC>>>>>                you both lie the same way.

PH>>>>Come on, Steve.  Let's see just how much of a boy you are.  March your
PH>>>>fat black ass down here and tell me I'm a liar, to my face.  (I hope
>>>>>     ^^^^^
SR>>>Excuse me, Patrick.  I don't see that Steve's skin color is of any 
SR>>>relevance.  I find the phraseology here repugnant.

PH>>I know, and I've already apologized to everyone (except Steve, of course)
PH>>for my choice of words.  If Borgie Boy wants an apology from me, he'll have
PH>>to come down here and get it in person -- no ifs, ands, or buts.  What color
PH>>Steve is doesn't mean anything to me, either -- he's a bozo, and that's all
PH>>I need to know.  

SC>Why not come up here to CA? You're the one who owes ME an apology; the
SC>one who owes is the one who goes, especially the one who STARTED it by
SC>making the racist statement. 

I hate to say it but this makes just as much if not more sense than 
Patrick's plan.  Why it can't be settled on the net is beyond me.

SR>>>Excuse me, Steve.  What is my name doing in this thread?  I would never 
SR>>>use the phrase that Patrick just used.  Please remove my name.  Thanks.

  [Here I first ask why Steve used my name in a thread that up until now 
   has only involved him and Patrick.  I then make a statement about 
   my own use of language so that newbies will not be confused by Steve's 
   previous use of my name in this thread.  I then ask Steve to remove 
   my name so that newbies will not be confused any further.  Note that 
   I do not accuse Steve of calling me a racist.  However, his prior use 
   of my name may confuse others, hence my statements.]

PH>>He's just trying to insinuate that about you, too, and as usual, he doesn't
PH>>have enough backbone to say what he really means.  

  [I think Patrick has overstated Steve's motivations here.  Steve merely 
   meant to confuse me with Patrick for no good reason (prior to the 
   objectionable phrase).  The fact that Steve later thinks that I agree 
   with Patrick's staement above shows how confusing these threads can get, 
   WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY I wrote the two lines before this.]

SC>No, you stupid asshole. 

SC>Scott Roby shows his absolute stupidity, as do YOU, PatricKKK
SC>Harumphrey, when you FAIL TO LOOK AT THE ATTRIBUTION HIERARCHY !! 

Steve,
I knew perfectly well the attribution history the last time I posted.  
However, I still find (due to your actions not mine) that my name is tangled 
into this thread containing the racial remark.  I asked you why you put 
my name in here and asked you to remove it.  You have explained 
lamely that you put it in here because you think Patrick and I 
are liars.  Since you clearly know I am telling the truth about 
who was issued the "Dennis Hall" account, I find your answer 
disingenuous. 

I see that you have still not removed my name from this thread.
Even though it was YOU who first introduced it here when it 
was a thread between only you and Patrick.

SC>TAKE A _BIG_ LOOK AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS TEXT. NOW, REMEMBER THE
SC>ARTICLE THAT WENT WITH IT? 

Yes, I understood this before.

SC>That was written one article BEFORE PatricKKK Harumphrey went off with
SC>his racist phrase, Roby and Harumphrey. You both are either absurd
SC>liars or stupid idiots in claiming that I, in that article where I
SC>referred to Scott Roby's name, was implying that Scott Roby is a
SC>racist like PatricKKK Harumphrey! 

I said no such thing.  I simply pointed out to Patrick that I 
disliked a phrase that he used and pointed out to you that my 
name had no reason for being in this thread (before or after the 
objectionable phrase).  I also made it clear that I do not use such 
objectionable phrases.  Regardless of your intentions, I find my 
name involved in a thread I don't like through YOUR actions not 
mine.

I also asked you to remove it, but find it still here.

SC>The mention of Scott Roby's name was an act of associating Scott with
SC>PatricKKK on the basis that you both are LIARS. Scott with his "Dennis"
SC>lie and PatricKKK with his "Conrad Vincent" lie. 

You clearly know that the "Dennis Hall" account was issued to you and 
therefore I am not a liar, so I find this answer to be disingenuous.  
I spent two - four "pages" of detailed, posted text explaining to netters 
how I determined that "Dennis Hall" and Steve Chaney were one and the same.  
And yet, you have been linking my name with Patrick's for the last few weeks 
with nary a credible reason.  IT WAS QUITE APPROPRIATE FOR ME to ask why my 
name was in this thread involving only you and Patrick.

SC>Now that you've been shown up to be absolutely STUPID, PatricKKK and
SC>Scotty Dog, care to retract THIS? 

I never said you intended to imply I was a racist.  However, your actions 
may have indirectly caused such an inference.  You were calling Patrick 
a racist and two posts earlier you were calling Patrick by my name for 
no good reason.  The confusion you have created (for whatever reason) is 
what I find objectionable.

PH>>I appreciate it.  Now watch Mr. Multiple Personalities try and twist your
PH>>words around into something the opposite of what you said, though.  (You
PH>>know, he *would* fit in at Egghead...:-)

Well, Patrick, you were right about twisting words.

SC>Now you can swallow those words. 

I have nothing to retract.  I asked you why you responded to Patrick's 
earlier post using my name and asked you to remove my name from this thread 
which concerns only you and Patrick.  I also stated that my language habits 
are different from Patrick's.  I still stand by those words.




-- 
Scott W. Roby           *This sentence no verb.*      "No Matter where you go..
Phys.& Astr.Dept.    ///// / /  /  *|*  \  \ \ \\\\\      there you are!"
Univ.of Delaware    ((((( ( (  (  * + *  )  ) ) )))))   -> Buckaroo Banzai
roby@brahms.udel.edu \\\\\ \ \  \  *|*  /  / / /////   *Standard Disclaimer*