HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Danielle has it all!!!
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 92 22:34:04 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.163428.28839@hubcap.clemson.edu> kudra@hubcap.clemson.edu (sallie j kudra) writes:
>mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:
>
>>To top it all we find out yesterday that Danielle can sing too!!  Wasn't
>>she just great?!?!  Now, maybe when she gets back to Salem she can sing
>>with Desiree at Wings.  :-)  Nancy, wish with me again?
>
>Ah, something has finally caught my attention enough to make me hit that
>little f key...................
>
>
>SING?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!  Tim you have got to be kidding.  She was dreadful!
>I totally cringed when I heard her.  I now am wondering about everyone who 
>raved about Desire's ability to sing (my lovely cable company kept me from 
>seeing/hearing her).

Well, I enjoyed the scene.  It was quite different from Desiree's singing, 
though.  She sang "O, Holy Night" a cappela and it gave me chills.  It was 
sooooooooooooo good.  I still get chills just thinking about it.  Wow!
Charlayne (sp?) has one hell of a terrific singing voice.

>Tim, don't get mad get even.  I haven't unlurked since before Christmas so 
>just go easy on me.
>
>SING!-----------------HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Hmmmm....I'm not advocating Dani as the next singer for Wings but she 
really wasn't bad -- probably much better than the average Joe.  :-)

>Sallie

| \____ ----- ____/           | HAPPYNET Disclaimer: This disclaimer is not |
|      ( o o )                | required by Leader Kibo.  This article does |
|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    | not necessarily represent the opinions of   |
|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! | Leader Kibo.  Have a nice day.              |
From: pokey@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Vince Rhee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Big time TAN (was Re: DOOL -- Snowballs in Hell)
Date: 9 Apr 92 15:00:46 GMT
Organization: Fightin' Texas A&M Baseball!

In article <1992Apr9.025526.6806@chpc.utexas.edu> peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo) writes:
>
>'Course I'm only following up on this one 'cause I was provoked!!!  Tim
>was right, Peach PIT must be much more closely related to Vick 'n Vince
                                                                   ^^^^^

	Heeeeyyyyyy....now wait just a darn tootin' minute...should
	I be resenting this implication?

>than to me.  Sniff.  Sniff.  I'm really gonna have to look into this 
>twin business.  'Near as I can recall, Tammy...er...I meant Peach...
>never seemed to have anything mean to say about anyone until she decides
>we're twins and then...what happens?...nothing but grief for me.  Sigh...
>
>>--Peach Pit :-) -- I'm the nice one, Joanna is the bad one.  You know about
>>Lemons, they're a little sour. :-)  
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

	hee hee hee.... (childish laughter fading into distance)

>
>Lemons are best!

	But limes go better with Cuervo Gold... (gee, can you tell that
	I'm starting my weekend a wee bit early? :-) )

>
>Joanna.
>

TTFN,
- Vince (aka Core-ona?)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      TTTTTTTTTTTTTT      Vince Rhee (Texas A&M '90)                  |
|      T     TT     T      Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering|  
|            TT            University of Texas at Austin               |
|    AAA     TT   MM   MM  Office : ENS 136   Phone : none             |
|   A   A    TT   M M M M  ===> Reply to : pokey@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu    |
|  AAAAAAA   TT   M  M  M                                              | 
|  A     A   TT   M     M  "So we're *not* high and dry...?"           |
|           TTTT           "We could not even be said to be high and   |
|		       	       vigorously toweling ourselves off."     |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: M21760@mwvm.mitre.org
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: B&B: Mileage may vary
Date: 8 Apr 92 17:05:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: mwvm.167C3B82A.M21760
Organization: The MITRE Corporation, McLean VA 22102

In article <92095.093034MZ6@psuvm.psu.edu>
MZ6@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
 
>
>So, sexual chemistry notwithstanding, I think this is how it has to
>go:
>- Ridge finds that Taylor is a much more intellectually-interesting soul
>  mate, and makes a commitment to her.
>- Eric, a maturing influence on Brooke, wins _her_ soul, if not her heart
>- Stephanie "settles" for Adam, who...
>- ....turns out to be Sally's "dead" husband.  Sally and Stephanie battle
>  over Adam, while Clarke realizes he was never married to Sally, and
>  will get NONE of her company
 
This is genius!  What a great story that would be!
 
>- Blake, incensed that Ridge and Taylor are growing closer, expedites
>  the transformation of Faith-to-Caroline.  Bring on the peroxide.
>- Begin a complicated four-way thing:  Blake begins to have real feelings
>  for Faith (a la _Pygmalion_), Taylor cannot shake her attraction for
>  Blake and remains ambivalent about Ridge's ability to commit, Faith
>  grows to care more and more for Ridge and less and less for the older
>  Blake, and Ridge is haunted by the stunning duplicate of his dead wife.
>
 
I, too, think that Blake will develop  feelings for Faith, just as she
starts to fall in love with Ridge.
 
 
>Opinions, anyone?
>
>Mike
 
Linda.
From: sager@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (mike.r.sager)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB: Monday update needed
Date: 14 Apr 92 18:19:45 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Apr14.155942.4637@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>, bawags@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (Her Heinous) writes:
> 
> HELP! Due to the underground flooding of the Chicago Loop, I
> did not get to see SB yesterday. I hope someone (Vivian or
> Leila come to mind instantly) can give me a short update.
> I know you all know how it it when you miss a show!
> Thanks
> Bernal
> -- 
> (bawags@cbnewsm.att.com) |       Life is a fatal sexually 
>  AT&T Bell Laboratories  |       transmitted disease.     SCHWING!
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
> Some people are so full of it ... they grow mushrooms   - John Long


Please post this update rather than e-mailing it as I, and probably others,
are in the same predicament.

Thanks,
Mike
From: sandra (Sandra Cole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC:  The new Galen Henderson
Date: 8 Apr 92 14:36:57 GMT
Reply-To: sandra (Sandra Cole)
Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA
Return-Path: <darnold>
Apparently-To: felix!postnews

In article <1992Mar27.191058.28921@nic.unh.edu> T_ADAMS@unhh.unh.edu (Tiffany   Adams) writes:
#
#
#
#i'm usually a lurker...but i just had to say this:
#
#My first impression of the new Galen Henderson:
#
#            B I M B O  !!!!!
#
#Granted, the old one couldn't act...but c'mon!!!!  She just tossed herself
#into Trevor's arms!!!

The new Galen does look like a Michelle Pfieffer(sp?) clone.  I'm
going to reserve judgement until I see more of her in action.   On
another note, I wish they had replaced the old Galen with another
brunette.  Now, if Trevor decides to get something going with Galen
Nat can go into that same old lame "you didn't really love me, I'm just
a blonde doll and any blonde will do, you don't really love me for
myself" speech.


sandra
sandra@filenet.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: 11dholst@galluj
Subject: Re: DOOL, more thoughts!
Organization: Gallaudet University
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 06:49:53 GMT


Thanks Gail for welcoming me in the group! I will try my best to respond as
frequent as I could.

	Ummm... I like many characters on DOOL and they are really good but
unfortunately that their storyline might be boring which make their character
rather more boring. When there is an exciting storyline, their character really
perk up! But, I do not like Rob (the new lawyer), L.B., Glynnis and several
more that haven't come to my mind yet!

	Carrie (still did not get used to her yet), is really a stubborn one,
do hope that she will be punched in the face by doing something wrongly! 

	On Monday, April 13, Bo is going to find a deep dark secret about
Carly's past that upsets him so TUNE IN! Could not stand to see Dani and John
so romantically involved but it sure does make the storyline more exciting!

	Is wondering about Roman, haven't seen him for a while now, same thing
goes for Molly, Tanner, Julie, Kayla. I could not be able to watch DOOL on
Tuesdays and Thursdays becuase of my classes.

	About the Romulus mystery, I am still curious how the storyline would
come out! I am also curious about Carly's past and how it would related to all
the mysteries that has been concealed from us and possibly if it fits the
Romulus, Alamain, etc!

Gotta go now so 'Til then!

Darren
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mjheal@bnr.ca (Mary-Jane Heal)
Subject: Re: DOOL 4/15 oversight
Reply-To: mjheal@bnr.ca
Organization: BNR, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Distribution:  na
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 15:10:18 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.083936.1@eagle.wesleyan.edu>, sscalia@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:
|> I just wanted to make a comment about the 4/15 episode.  IMHO the
|> writers/directors made a huge mistake showing the baby's heartbeat.
|> She looked at least 7 months pregnant.  On the show isn't she 3 months
|> pregnant?  At least this is what Jennifer told Jack that the baby would be born
|> in six months.  I've never seen a three month pregnant woman that big, unless
|> she might be having quintuplets(?).

She looked 7 months because Missy Reeves is 7 months pregnant (well 6 1/2 at
the time of shooting that scene).  But my sister-in-law was just as big at 3
months as she is now which is 8 months.  Each to their own I guess.  So I 
guess it can't be called a huge mistake, though she difinitely was HUGE!
Much more realistic than Izzy's ultrasound, but then again, what are they
going to show us, rubber? or foam?

|> 
|> A thought just occurred (it's a miracle), maybe that's why children on DOOL age
|> so quickly, it starts from conception.

Ya, thats the ticket!!

|> 
|> Santina
|> 

MJ
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MJ Heal                   | Being married to Jack Deveraux is like cuddling
BNR, Ottawa, ON, Canada   | up with Chuckles the Clown and a depressed pit
mjheal@bnr.ca             |            bull at the same time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- DISCLAIMER:  Any opinions expressed are definitely not those of my     --
-- Employer and depending on flames received may not be even be my own.   -- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: mcconiha@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Susan L. McConihay)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: What makes you think Dani is Romulus
Date: 8 Apr 92 15:24:44 GMT
Article-I.D.: gn.1992Apr8.152444.7169
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network

In article <Apr.8.10.21.46.1992.23483@gandalf.rutgers.edu> shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan) writes:
>
>
>>By the way... we know Viv is Lizard's mother.  She had an
>
>Do we know that?
>

no, but we're assuming....

>>extra-marital affair with Herr VonLeuchner, which makes Katerina
>
>Did she definately have an affair with Herr Von Loichner?
>
no, but we can daydream all we want

>>Lizard's half sister. This accounts for Viv's opposition to their
>>relationship, and horror at their having a child.  She was afraid the
>>kid would get a double dose of the famous VonLeuchner eyebrows.
>
>That would make sense.  Then I guess the kid really did die?
>
in that scenario, I would hope so- daytime tv isn't ready for that.


Susan
-- 
 Susan McConihay           |"It is not enough to have a good mind.
 mcconiha@gn.ecn.purdue.edu| The main thing is to use it well."-
                           |          Rene Descartes
From: daveo@hpcvra.cv.hp.com (Dave Ochs)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 23:24:02 GMT
Subject: Re: AMC:  Dimitri
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Co., Corvallis, OR, USA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps

>/ hpcvra:rec.arts.tv.soaps / jjl5730@usl.edu (Lancon Jeff J) / 11:56 am  Apr 13, 1992 /

>	Ok, I think I'm asking for it with this post.  Mega-Flame-Fest '92.
>But I am slowly starting to like Dimitri.  His attitude has changed             significantly since he first came on, IMHO.  I like the way he handles 
>himself around Erica.  They have finally found a guy who can be as smooth
>and scheming as her.  

I agree, I am beginning to like him now that he is facing off with Erica and
has stopped wearing the stupid scarves.  Erica brings out the best in him
... he could be real popular if they would just put him in tight jeans as 
some of the female viewers have suggested :-)

>	He still doesn't compare to Trevor, though.
>                      or Tad (he will come back, he will come back.....)

He doesn't compare to Trevor, true ... it's an apples and oranges situation.
Tad was great, but I am beginning to think he's never coming back (although
how Michael Knight is making a living is beyond me ... I haven't seen him
in anything).

>On another note,

Seems like there is an age gap in characters these days.  We have Brian/
Hayley/Terrence/AnLi for the high school crowd (right!), but no one is
college age or a bit older.  It's too bad we lost Joey ... he was OK once
EmAnn and Katie were gone.

>                                   V    Jeff J. Lancon
>American By Birth,                /%\   E-mail addresses:  jjl5730@usl.edu
>  Southern by the Grace of God!   |&|                      iothlp14@ucs.usl.edu 
>                                  \@/  <= Trevor tie       thlp010@uslvm.usl.edu

Dave Ochs               "I think people who are really good at math have a
daveo@cv.hp.com          tendency to be prone to mental illness." - Hayley
From: jablonski@cs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: GH:  Amy
Date: 10 Apr 92 16:24:30 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: COINS, UMass, Amherst


Well, for all you folks that have been begging for an Amy storyline
I guess you finally got your wish.  What's with Amy getting a boob
implant? That would have been a great storyline for BOOBie :-)


pat
From: robson@deneb.cis.udel.edu (Janice Robson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT- Goodbye
Date: 13 Apr 92 19:20:20 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Delaware, Newark

In article <1992Apr13.143459.2469@morrow.stanford.edu> MN.RWC@forsythe.stanford.edu (RODNEY W. CARTER) writes:
>Hi All,

Hi yourself! 

>According to SOD the actor who plays Gavin is leaving the show. His last
>air date is supposed to be 1 May 92. SOD doesn't say HOW or under WHAT
>circumstances Gavin will be leaving, but since he IS  being tried for
>murder right now, one can only assume that he's found guilty....

Would the writers really wimp out and lay the blame on an actor
who's contract is up? And if Gavin REALLY did do all these murders
than what a let down!!!  We have waited (im)patiently for a year, 
I think the writers could do better.

>And on another note, this is the last week that I'll be able to read the

Say it isn't so Rodders!  You must, you must, find a way to communicate
with us.  It was pure agony when you abandoned us for the Y&R ward,
and only added a comment or two on ATWT, but now we'll hear NOTHING 
from you?????????????????????????????? I can't bear the thought.
Someone call nursie, I need more "vitamins"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>newsgroup for awhile. I'm taking the last two weeks of April off and then
>coming back for the first two weeks of May. My last day at this job is
>tentatively scheduled to be 15 May 1992. After that I'll be at my new job
>(and net-less until I either get the company hooked up or until I buy a
>computer and a modem for home). 

Well, have a GREAT vacation and the best of luck in your new job! 
I hope everything works out just fine for you - you deserve nothing
but the BEST!  



>It's been great getting to know you bunch
>of crazies, and I'll miss you all. But don't count me permanently out of
>the game. Just like James Slimebeck, I'll come back from the dead when you
>least expect it....

Now don't tease me! You know I LOVE James Slimebeck and his twisted 
plots!  I have been begging the writers to bring him back - it's 
just no fun without the James Slimebeck's storylines!


>And for those of you who have been wondering what's happened to BaByDoLl,
>her whole department had their net connections taken away. They still have
>e-mail, but no connection to the net.

How did you ever find her! I thought BaByDoLl might have taken Jeep's Yuckdale map
and went in search of Fargone to give her a CLUE!! Or to tell H2D the truth
just to measure Bab's flairing nostrels in person!  Or tell Holdem' and Chilly
the truth about little Error, or tell Enema to experience romance before trying
to write about it, or to tell Sleaza what the viewers really think about her
black and white flashbacks, or smack AnUs upside his head, or...,or...,or...,
well, I was just plain sick with worry and I was imagining all of these 
horrible things! 

>Ciao all,
>Rodders

I'll miss you terribly;(     
Studmuffette
From: marks@skat.usc.edu (Louise Marks)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: "Swiss" Chocolates
Date: 7 Apr 1992 10:54:10 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: skat.usc.edu

vectrgsj@VAX.CSUN.EDU (GSAIDJOHNSON) writes:

>Did anyone else from this side of the continent notice that the "Swiss" 
>chocolate Danielle was trying to feed John was See's candy?  Okay, so the men 
>didn't notice anything but the temptation.  Well, See's candy is pretty 
>tempting, too!  I recognized the box right away.

Yep, noticed right away.  Maybe I just have provincial tastes, but
See's beats any Swiss (or Belgian, or French) chocolate I've ever had!

Ummmmmm, Bordeaux.... a whole pound of them....

-- 
  /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  / Louise Marks                          Internet: marks@skat.usc.edu    /
  / University of Southern California     BITNET:   marks@uscvm           /
  /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: gibbsm@ll.mit.edu (MargARET D. Gibbs)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC:  The Suspect List and Addendum R.A.T.S. List
Date: 7 Apr 92 19:43:24 GMT
Organization: M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory

In article <1992Apr7.045610.25585@news.cs.indiana.edu> guthrie@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (Beth Guthrie) writes:
[list of suspects for Will's murder]
>Am I missing anyone? 

How about Steve Hammill?  He's recently shown that he can have a
very nasty temper!  I don't think he did it, but he's certainly
a suspect in my book.

-- 
Margaret D. Gibbs		"Practice random kindness and 
Assistant Staff			 senseless acts of beauty"
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
gibbsm@ll.mit.edu
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Thursday, 16 Apr 1992 11:50:06 CDT
From: John R. Andrews <U14780@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: OLTL: Who Dun It?

Anyone think maybe it is the DA himself? He is awfully hot to convict Cain.
Actually, I don't really think it's him, but I was hoping Oliver Stone
would pick up the screenplay from me.
From: jayers@hamline.edu (Judi Ayers)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re:      Re: Y&R - Sheila, SuperMom
Date: 10 Apr 92 15:37:31 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Hamline University, St. Paul, MN.

In article <1992Apr10.132217.150862@cs.cmu.edu> sylvia+@cs.cmu.edu (Sylvia Berry) writes:
>
>
>
>
>In article <92100.131337C31995EC@wuvmd.wustl.edu> Elana <C31995EC@WUVMD> writes:
>>  Okay - I have a stupid question.  I've been watching Y&R for about 4
>>years now, but I am still confused about that birthmark.  What does it
>>have to do with anything?  I know the whole story with Sheila, Lauren,
>>Lauren's REAL baby, Molly, etc., but how would this birthmark expose
>>Sheila as a baby-snatcher?
>>
>>-- R.H.M.
>
>Lauren remembers about her baby's birthmark. They dismissed it as just one of
>those things that shows up at birth and then dissapears after a few days. 
>Shelia is real panicky about the mark because she knows it could identify the 
>baby. This is one of the reasons she has been keeping the baby away from Lauren
>Knowone would have even made mention of it if Shelia hadn't made such a big 
>deal about it. Now Lauren will know it's her baby. She will remember her son 
>had a birthmark and should put two and two together about why Shelia would want
>it removed. 
>
>Ramblin'
>Syl


I'm guessing that Scott will mention the birthmark surgery to Lauren
because he was so pissed at Sheila for doing this.  This should be
when Lauren will put two and two together.  Hmmmm, she'll say.  What
are the chances of the same man fathering two babies born on the
same day and both of them having a birthmark?  Hmmmmmm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: ritat@athena.mit.edu (Rita Tendolkar)
Subject: Re: ATWT 
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 01:16:06 GMT

In article <3600@novavax.UUCP>, juliet@novavax.UUCP (Juliet Sallette) writes:
|> This is in response to Wayne's speculations about Lisa, Bob, & Tom.
|> 
|> 
|> Yes, the big secret is that Tom is not Bob's child.  It will be 
|> devastating to find this out.  The saddest thing is that almost everyone
|> on this show has been fathered or mothered by someone else all
|> their lives only to find out years later that someone else is really there
|> mother or father.  
|> 
|> Is this the only story line tha the writers can come up with?  If so 
|> they all should be taken out and fired for lack of creativity.
|> 
|> Just a few humbe comments.
|> 
|> Later
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> 

OK, so are you gonna tell us the juicy details or leave us hanging?
I wonder if Tom "Mr. Honesty" Hughes will be able to forgive his mommy.
Also, I wonder how this will affect the relationship between tom and bob
which seems to be one of the only relationships on ATWT that has been
pretty smooth. 
|> 
|> 
|> 
|>   ___        _              __       ()          _  _
|>  (   >      //     _/_     /  )      /\         // //   _/_ _/_
|>   __/__. . // o _  /      /         /  )  __.  // // _  /   /  _
|>  / /  (_/_</_<_</_<__    (__/ o    /__/__(_/|_</_</_</_<___<__</_
|> <_/
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak)
Subject: Re: DOOL:  TAN:  A nasty response to Sunni, An
Organization: AT&T
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:22:52 GMT

In article <35095@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> noonan@sonata.enet.dec.com (Costumes & Makeup & Kliegs, oh my!) writes:
>
>In article <ku90neINNd67@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM>, pinyan@bonnie.Corp.Sun.COM (Ann Pinyan) writes...
>> 
>> 
>>>Good for you, do you want a prize now?  But let me ask this...  how do 
>>>you know just how "bad" things are if you kill so many posts?  I think
>>>I'll just call you .clueless E from now on.
>> 
>> 
>>>I've really had it with people like Ann and .clueless.  I like this 
>>>group!  I know that *most* people like this group!  I think these 
>>>ladies are just trying to start trouble amongst us.  However, I have
>>>no plans on ignoring them as they need to be shown for the idiots 
>>>they are.  To everyone else, don't go so soft on them [this means you
>
>
>
>         Well, now.  I *do* find *this* particular little bit
>         enlightening.  How is it that I have not yet seen this post? 
>         I stopped killing my DOOL files specifically to see how much
>         slamming we got for daring to voice *our* opinions.  But this
>         has not made it here.

Beats me.  I posted it to "the world".  I'm sure you'll be graced with
it in it's entirety soon enough.

>         It does sort of prove the point that we are making though,
>         doesn't it?

What proves what point?  What is the "it" in your sentence referring to?
I'm just a mean old heathen regular poster and you'll have to explain things
in much simpler terms for me.  

>         .sigless E
>
>         That's .sigless!

Yeah yeah, whatever.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
|  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
|  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |