From: rot@multisys.com (Republic of Taiwan)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.taiwan
Subject: Re: a few question about taiwan
Date: 15 Sep 1992 08:16:41 -0500
Organization: Multimedia Information Systems Corporation, San Jose, CA                        TEL: (408) 436-8929            E-mail: info@multisys.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

In article <1992Sep15.021922.24902@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> li@sicvax.enet.dec.com (Tong-Kang Li) writes:
=
=I believe you are referring to my post #29557. Frankly, I dont even know
=you why should I hate you? I dont believe anyone will hate you. You are 
=not the only TI supporter on this net. We are not all KMT supporters, at 

This is a very intersting 'something' happens all the time.
People seems love to frame the other people with a name
or term.

It seems I have been framed as a Ti-er or TI-supporter
all the time. Can't people think of something else
except capping other people.

Did I ever say 'You, Li are such such-er'.

Now, this is a real name calling.

=least not me. This newsgroup is an open forum, everyone can speak freely. 

Except people like you love to giving other netters caps
to wear, if their arguments do not fit in your mind.

=But if you are talking ridiculously and rudely that certainly will draw 
=a lot of criticism. If you continue to do so then dont expect others treat 

Sometimes I am wondering, is the person calling others names
ridiculous, or the person being name calling attacked ridiculous.

It seems, if other people's arguments contradit to your
believe, then those people will be called by you as
'talking ridiculously and rudely'.

=you with respect. As you said, TI seems to be an equal to KMT on the net, 

Did I ever try to make you respect me?
Jeus, sounds like I am a Chun-Kai-Shen II.

=why no one stands by your opinion but all you have received is against 
=your opinion. You dont self-examine but blame for others. 

That's real life, mannn. 

Did I ever blame you?
What did I blame you for? 
Yes, I did and do criticize KMT and CCP a lot. 

You can not be serious enough to think that you are KMT 
and all the time I was criticizing KMT was acturally criticizing you, 
are you?

=Just based on your statement above, I dont think you are mentally healthy,
=not even to mention your other opinion.

It seems some netters keep calling me mentally something.
So it is you after all. So you are a psychologist now.
Well, what can I say.

I wrote
=>I have a bad memory to remember people's name. This is
=>why I always argue with arguments not with people.
=>(This means I don't care the posters are TI-er, KMT-er,
=>CCP-er or whatever-er)
=
=We too. We only argue with arguments not with people. 
 ^^      ^^

Who is we? A mentally ill double personality patientS?

I wrote,
=>I still remember couple years ago, no one on the net
=>will admit he or she is a TI promoter except Mitch.
=>Now, TI seems to be an equal to KMT and people start
=>to worry about what if TI-ers elected by the people
=>to be in charge of the new government.
=
=Frankly if majority TIers like you I dont think there is a chance. 

I dont't know you care so much about TIers.
Oh! Yea! Right! Since you believe you, yourselfe are KMT and
KMT has gone for TI which means TI includes TI,DDP,KMT,
so you should care for TI.

AS to me, I just don't give a damm about TI, KMT, DDP, CCP
or whatever.

I wrote,
=>IMHO, it is really a big progress toward a dmocratic
=>Taiwan.
=
=We all wish that.
 ^^

Getting serious, I heard psychologists often are mentally
unstable.   :-)

I wrote,
=>I believe there has a lot of users in Taiwan paying
=>their attention on SCT closely, though they seldom
=>speak out their opinion.
=
=That's good, I hope they can make a right choice.
              ^

One of the personalty seems to win out at last.