HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Re: Hmmm...
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 17:17:33 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: VMARK Software, Inc.

In article <1993Jan20.233123.3835@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.172459.26511@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>>>  Well, it's widely accepted on r.s.f.p. that Ed Lor is a jerk, and I'm not,
>>>  ergo, Ed Lor is a jerk. I wasn't aware that the majority held such sway over
>>>  you.
>>
>>Well, this is also a widely accepted fact on r.s.b.p as well, 
>A fact is a fact. Is there such a thing as a widely accepted fact? If a
>fact needs acceptance, then it can't a fact.


Fact: a truth known by actual experience or observation

Widely accepted due to many people actually observing or experiencing this
truth...

>
>>so it is looking more and more like a fact :-)
>You know what a fact is? Meeks is a wimp, because he usually wimp out on
>arguments after about a month. Now that's a fact.


Actually, this is an opinion you have.  Not a fact.  

-- 
David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Hmmm...
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 23:00:08 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.174427.18724@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>Yes, but it is probably someone who has seen you get into a couple of these
>with a variety of people.  
Yes, like who? Gary? he has been at odds with NFC woofers for months. I am not
the only one. Ask John Gloria.

>There is, like I said before, a common thread...
Yep, Lor vs Meeks certainly is. Lor vs ??? is still to be proven.

>EdLor...  So, it makes sense that people get annoyed with you first and 
>foremost.  Don't worry, I am sure people are annoyed that I continue as well,
>but you make it such a habit you set yourself up for it...
Yes, and I wasn't involved when people called you "cock sucking fag artist",
"pinhead", "asshole" in rec.sport.football.college. So don't give me
all the credit....

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
Subject: Re: dallas over bills
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 17:17:15 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.062233.39340@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> kjs5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (KRISTIAN JOHN SCHAFER) writes:
>By winning the NFC East and beating the 49'ers the Cowboys have firmly
>established themselves as the class of the NFC.  Emmit Smith was the leauges
>leading rusher, Aikman was the NFC's second highest rated quarterback, and
>Irvin is clearly one of the top receivers in football.  And don't forget
>Dallas's #1 rated defense which is playing for pride after being snubbed by
>the league by not sending any Cowboy defenders to the Pro Bowl.  The Cowboys
>are riding a wave of momentum right to a Super Bowl victory.
>The Bills have not been nearly as consistent as the Cowboys this year.
>Quality teams don't have to make 32 point comebacks because they don't find
>themselves in such a mess.
>
> Cowboys: 34
> Bills: 13
>
> -A dedicated Cowboy fan.

I agree with everything you stated EXCEPT your last statment:

"Quality teams don't have to make 32 point comebacks because they don't find
themselves in such a mess."

I hope you really didn't mean what you said. The truth is, "GREAT teams
will make 32 point comebacks, period." Now, everyone knows that I am
NOT a Bills supporter or a Kelly supporter, but you are fringing
on silliness to imply that "Quality teams don't have to make 32 point
comebacks, etc." A "comeback" is a sign of a great team, whether it
be last minute TD to win a game, or a 32 point comeback. The 32 point
comeback does make for a better story and in this particular game, 
it made HISTORY! I am not saying that the Bills are GREAT enough to win 
it all or any team that makes comebacks is likewise GREAT, but it takes 
composure and courage to overcome just deficits.

I would not discount the Bills so easily, but my money is on the Cowboys
to win.

-A Dedicated Niners fan.

******* John P. Gloria ****** jpglori@sysengr.PacBell.COM *******
-- 
"No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. 
Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities."
		   - Christian Nestell Bovee -
From: pyoung@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Paul Young)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Wanted/Predictions
Date: 27 Jan 93 18:02:57 GMT
Reply-To: pyoung@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Paul Young)
Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD

In rec.sport.football.pro, alaw@ap1seq.us.oracle.com (Alvin W. Law) writes:
>mg5c+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael D. Goettsche) writes:
>>Just out of curiousity, I'm wondering what all of you think the score
>>regarding Super Bowl XXVII will be.  I'm putting together a little poll
>>to see what the general consensus is.  Please no opinions -- just a
>>score.  Thanks.
>>
>>Dallas 27
>>Buffalo 17

Dallas 24
Buffalo 20
From: marshall@NEBULA.SSD.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM (Bob Marshall)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: hmmm....? what?
Date: 25 Jan 93 06:03:12 GMT
Reply-To: marshall@NEBULA.SSD.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Distribution: usa
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California

In article <1993Jan24.092734.9859@math.ucla.edu>, rfedkiw@joshua.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:
>In one of these many annoying articles, edward lorr states...
>that S.F at 15-3 and Buffalo at 14-5 is a THREE game difference.
>
>WRONG. 
>If Buffalo won ONLY 2 of those five loses they are 16-3, a BETTER record.
>(Winning one more game this year makes them 15-4)
>So it's more like a 1.5 game difference.

Actually, both Ron and Ed can be annoying at times. Anyway, I missed the
original post, and I can't imagine what the point of it was anyway, but
the fact is that the difference between 15-3 and 14-5 is 1-1/2 games,
not three games. Actually, I *can* imagine what the point was, and it's
completely irrelevant at this stage.

=============================================================================
Bob Marshall                     \\     "Women aren't as smart as they
Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.     \\     think they are; they think we
Sunnyvale, CA                      \\    men know a lot more than we
marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com\\   really do."
"I tell the truth 'cept when I lie"  \\     - Tim the Toolman
=============================================================================
From: edquist@eng.umd.edu (Karl T. Edquist)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Famous Jerseys
Date: 25 Jan 1993 17:09:15 GMT
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity von Uniland, College Park
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: valkyrie.eng.umd.edu
Originator: edquist@valkyrie.eng.umd.edu


In article <JOHNDOE93Jan23.060701@jefferson.inmet>, johndoe@jefferson.inmet (johndoe) writes:
>>>>If you see a player wearing nr.16 or 13, you associate immediately
>>>>with Joe Montana and Dan Marino...
>>>
>>>20. Rocky Bleier/Billy Sims/Barry Sanders
>> 20. Lem Barney/Mel Renfro

20. Joe Morris

22. Mike Haynes

>> 53. Mick Tingelhoff

53. Randy Gradishar

>>>87. Dwight Clark
>> 87. Raymond Chester/Willie Davis
>      wasn't chester 88 when with the raiders because of their other fairly
>      great te whose name escapes me

87. Dave Casper

94. Charles Haley



Karl
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Kall@Mayo.EDU
Subject: Re: Why Buffalo will win (Re: "How bout them Cowboys")
Reply-To: Kall@Mayo.EDU
Organization: Mayo Foundation
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 21:23:36 GMT

In article 24915@cbnewsk.cb.att.com, lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.152325.21236@oakhill.sps.mot.com> floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Floyd Goodrich) writes:
>>In article <C16Ks7.A2H@acsu.buffalo.edu> kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) writes:
>>>
>>>But, this year, they know they have an important job to do. 
>>Dallas as well know they have an important job to do.
>>
>>>They don't want to be embarrassed by being the only team to lose in 3 in a row. 
>>Dallas doesn't want to be embarassed by being one of 3 teams to lose 4 SBs.
>>
>>>The Bills are not satisfied with being there; they want to win it. 
>>And Dallas is just satisfied with being there?
>>
>>I don't see any clear advantage for the Bills.  
>
>You know, Floyd, the Bills fans are desperate for sure. You have to give them
>the leeway that all the above factors are really significant, or they will 
>think of something more crazy:
>
>1) the Bills' uniform color is darker, thus the team is tougher
>2) the Bills play in tougher weather
>3) the Bills are alphabetically ahead of the Cowboys
>4) the Bills represent a conference that's alphabetically ahead
>5) the Bills didn't endure a 1-15 season

Sorry Ed, they have in the past.

>6) the Bills have more Michael Jordans
>7) the Bills win playoff games on the road; in this SB, the NFC is 
>   the home team
>.......
>
>-- 
>                                          Edward Lor
>                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
>                                          



---



\------------------------------------------------------------\
 \   Bruce Kall                \  Internet:   Kall@Mayo.edu   \
  \   Mayo Clinic (Foundation)  \  Phone: (507)-255-4768       \
   \   Rochester, MN 55905       \                              \
    \                             \                              \
     \   Go BILLS!!!!!!!!!!!       \  Go BILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!        \
      \------------------------------------------------------------\

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit)
Subject: Re: dallas over bills
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:22:27 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

mrn3@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MATTHEW R. NARBY) writes:

>In article <1993Jan23.062233.39340@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, kjs5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (K
>RISTIAN JOHN SCHAFER) writes:
>rather, embarrassed by the Eagles? Didn't the Cowgirls also lose to the
>Cardnals? And who had to play the #2 toughest schedule? wasn't the Cowwimps. I

Nope, we beat the "Cardnals."  And by the way, who is emabarrased now, the
Eagles or the Cowboys.

What does it take to get respect ?  The Cowboy's schedule has been
dredged up many times.  You don't win the NFC east, and NFC without having
a good defense.  I suppose that if the Cowboys beat the Bills, people will
just say, oh it was just the Bills, they can't win a SB anyway.

			-Ron
From: hunter@wpi.WPI.EDU (George M. Berberian)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bills have to win SB
Date: 20 Jan 1993 22:56:21 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: rec
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu
Keywords: Oilers, AFC

In article <1497@fozzy.UUCP> ckoontz@aud.alcatel.com writes:
>
>There is no doubt in my mind that the Bills will win the Super Bowl this
>year.  Not even the Oilers could lose three Super Bowls in a row.
>
>--
>Carl Koontz
>ckoontz@rdxsun40.aud.alcatel.com
..............................................................................
EXCUSE ME!!!!!

I don't think either team wants to loose, number one.
Number two: 
           Dallas should handle the Bills offense, because their defense is
           the best in football.
           Buffalo should score, but i don't think many times. 
           Thurman may get a touchdown. Add that with two (2) field goals
           and thats what i get for Buffalos score. 13 points
           Dallas should score 3 or 4 touchdowns on Buffalo and also add
           2 field goals. 27 or 34 points.
           
           Whoever gets the ball first, can set the pace. If they go three
           and out. I think maybe that could tell the outcome. 
           A turnover on the opening first series could spell dysaster. (sp)
           Keys to a superbowl victory:
            third down conversions
            NO turnovers
            stay healthy
        
            Final score:

                    Dallas with between   27/35  points
                    Buffalo with between   10/17 points
        
           All in all, Dallas should beat'em up first half and score alot
           second half.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pedersen@seas.smu.edu (Ted Pedersen)
Subject: Re: Funny SB quote
Organization: SMU - School of Engineering & Applied Science - Dallas
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 16:41:37 GMT

More Nate Newton stuff...

I heard him on the radio this morning (KLIF-AM) and he was asked if he
was going to go to the beach in Hawaii when he's there for the Pro
Bowl. (This is a loose quote, it was early and I was sleepy).

"No way man, I don't wanna get harpooned." 

a little later in the same interview...

"Orca! Orca! Don't wanna come back with a spear in my back."
From: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM (Bennet Ih - Sun BOS Hardware)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: RIGGIE WHITE close to signing with Washing
Date: 22 Jan 1993 17:35:20 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc. - BDC
Distribution: world
Reply-To: bih@mowgli.East.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: mowgli.east.sun.com

In article 5400@nlm.nih.gov, news@nlm.nih.gov () writes:
>
>In an recent interview reggie white said that he is 
>talking with washington very seriously. Also he
>mentioned that since washington is so close to
>philadelphia that he and his family will not have
>to go through major changes.....

How does the "Franchise player" clause in the new NFL labor agreement
come into play here? I can't imagine Philly letting Reggie White go, 
especially to another NFC East team. 

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: holly@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com (Holly Wise)
Subject: Re: The Superbowl and Domestic Violence
Organization: Lockheed Santa Cruz, CA.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 19:06:37 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.211608.118140@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> jpr1@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (James P. Reynolds) writes:


>Super Bowl Sunday - which this year is January 31, here in southern
>California at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena - is the single worst day
>for domestic violence in the USA.  There is an increase of as much as
>40% in the volume handled by domestic violence shelters on this day.

I promise I won't beat my husband, unless he stands in front of the T.V.  
Fair enough?
-----
holly@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: RIGGIE WHITE close to signing with Washington
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 13:04:44 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.211700.5400@nlm.nih.gov> news@nlm.nih.gov writes:
>In an recent interview reggie white said that he is 
>talking with washington very seriously. Also he
>mentioned that since washington is so close to
>philadelphia that he and his family will not have
>to go through major changes.....

Yay!!!

Whatever happened to the Skins' DL drafts? Tracy Rocker was a bust. Bobby
Wilson still hasn't asserted himself. The only solution is to sign a big-name
DL. I think their last good lineman drafted was Charles Mann.

I wish the Skins would have spent all their picks on OL.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
From: tap1040@zeus.tamu.edu (SPEED RACER)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: COWGIRLS
Date: 21 Jan 1993 23:41 CST
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: zeus.tamu.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

In article <1993Jan19.055405.14903@math.ucla.edu>, ashamam@oak.math.ucla.edu (Asher Shamam) writes...
>They suck dick.
>They are all fags like Hamish.
> 

And they are also in the Super Bowl, you dork!!!  :-)
___________________________________________________________________________
Tracy Persky           Texas A&M University           tap1040@zeus.tamu.edu

John Madden: "There's a good sign.  Troy Aikman putting his pants back on."
Pat Summerall: "That's ALWAYS a good sign."  (RFK Stadium, Nov. 24, 1991)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: matjmm@gsusgi1.gsu.edu (J. Morgan Morris)
Subject: Re: dallas over bills (You're Wrong too!)
Organization: Georgia State University
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:16:38 GMT

v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:

>In article <1993Jan23.062233.39340@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, kjs5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (KRISTIAN JOHN SCHAFER) writes...
>>
>>The Bills have not been nearly as consistent as the Cowboys this year.
>>Quality teams don't have to make 32 point comebacks because they don't find
>>themselves in such a mess.
>>
>I see now, the Cowboys are suddenly a quality team, next year they
>will be where the Giants are, and the Redskins are.   They have one
>good year, then fall to the bottom the next year.  If Dallas is
>a quality team, then why did they have such a problem with Barry
>Sanders in the playoffs last year?  Answer: When the Cowboys  have
>to play against a team that can run, they have problems.  And when
>Dallas goes to three straight Superbowls, independent of which
>conference they play in, then you can say their team is quality.
>For now all you can say is that the team is a good one.

I'm glad you're paying attention to last year and not this year,
because that makes it easier to ridicule your comments. Any discussion
of history is fruitless; it's this year that counts. (If you want history,
how many Super Bowls have the Bills been in? How many have they won?)

Further, it wasn't teams who could run that gave the Cowboys fits last
year; it was the run-and-shoot. 

I don't recall the exact stats, but Dallas ended up with the #1 ranked
defense, facing several of the top-ranked running offenses in the league.
The Cowboys were only outplayed in one game this year, and they 
avenged that loss twice.

Get your facts straight.

>If Dallas had their number two quarterback in a playoff game,
>I don't think they would win, whereas with the BIlls, they have
>THE BEST second stringers in the league.   BTW, I don't think
>your team could ever come back from a 32 point defecit.  The
>Bills have come back from 17 points down, 24 points down.  At
>least the Bills never quit in a game.  I think that the Cowboys
>are over-rated because they played Philadelphia ( a team that
>is like New Orleans, good D, no O) and a San Fran team without
>Montana (Young's second playoff game).

I would trust Steve Beuerlein, since he did an excellent job for them 
last year. 

Overrated? Put Buffalo in the NFC East, and they would't even be 
11-5. I don't consider Philadelphia or San Francisco to be especially
weak. Power ratings (not guaranteed measures, but all we have for
comparison) consistently ranked Philadelphia and San Francisco ahead
of Buffalo during the regular season.

>Project Pasadena: Buffalo Bills defeat Dallas Cowboys 35-24

>Bruce, a Bills fan

No prediction made; I refuse to jinx the 'Boys like I did in the
past!

Later,
Morgan


-- 

John Morgan Morris
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
Georgia State University
University Plaza
Atlanta, GA. 30303-3083

Internet: matjmm@gsusgi1.gsu.edu
Telephone: (404) 651-2253
FAX: (404) 651-2246

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Re: Hmmm...
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 16:04:12 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: VMARK Software, Inc.

In article <1993Jan21.204801.28282@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor) writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.173348.44784@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>>Lots of examples to disprove this theory...
>Show us in any football final polls. I can't wait ....


Oh, this is too easy Ed...

Texas A&M 12-1
FSU 11-1
Notre Dame 10-1-1???  

Who was the higher ranked of these teams????  Hint - not the team with
the most victories...
-- 
David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!)
Subject: NY Giants - Current Personnel, Free Agents, Draft?
Organization: Yale University
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:28:02 GMT

Whew, Now that I'm done with my morning tantrum, I'd like to talk about our 
current roster and who is up for free agency.  REALITY CHECK!  

Lets face it, I think a HUGE portion of our roster is on the way out, no?
And now that Parsells in taking NE, we can guess where some of them will go.

I'm pretty sure the following would be free agents:
Jumbo Elliot
Phil Simms
Bart Oates
Steve Baker
Mark Ingram
Reyna Thompson
Collins?
Matt Bahr
Hostetler ??

Who am I missing? (more than a lot I'm sure...)

What I am trying to get at here, is what type of personnel will the G's be 
looking to pick up?  Offensive line?  YES, PLEASE! We gotta protect our 
rookie QB's a little better than this year.  Or they need a quick drop pass 
patern to work on...

We got Bunch/Hampton who look solid and I think are staying.
We got McCaffrey who stays (he looks most promising!)
Corey Miller, K. McGee and Cross ?

We got a couple rookie QB's in Graham and Brown (and ol ceiling tiles hoss 
has had his bell rung 1 too many times) so I dont think we will even 
consider picking anyone up.  Maybe Parsells will take Hoss :-)

Where do the Giants come out in draft picks?   (we've 
probably traded ALL our picks away!) We lost our first round pick by taking 
Brown in the supplemental last year right?  

I sure hope that if Reeves signs, he puts together a good offensive 
coordinator and a GREAT defensive coord. to pull us together.  Any word on 
whether he would take any previous staff with him?

TIA,
Adriene (Giants in 93! The Rebuild starts the day we get a new coach!)
From: bwb00@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Brian Brakke)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:15:11 GMT
Subject: Re: Wade Phillips Top Bronco
Organization: Wits End
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro

In rec.sport.football.pro, reams@crchh462.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Cary Reams) writes:

    Heard Wade Phillips got the job as Bronco Head Coach.

    How long has he been with Denver ?  (Any chance Buddy
    Ryan could takeover the Defensive job he leaves open?)

Wade came in as Defensive Coordinator in 1989...   Odds are pretty good that
he'll name Charlie Waters (DB coach) to be the new D. Coordinator..
Here's one person who's thinks Bowlen made the right choice!! Now  we'll see
if he gets in the way (Bowlen, that is), or if Wade can do the job!!
It was nice to see someone genuinely HAPPY about getting a new job...

Brian
------------------------------------+---------------------------
     ---                            | Brian Brakke 
    /  /                            | PO BOX 301
   /----/  __    *  __    _ _       | 815 SW 14Th Street  
  /    /  /  /  /  /  |  /|/ |      | Loveland CO  80538 
_/____/__/   \_/\__\__|_/ |  |____  | 
      But you can call me    B.     | bbrakke@hplvec.lvld.hp.com
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dwarner@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (David J.)
Subject: Boomer Esiason
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 02:10:26 GMT

Okay, time to quell a rumor -- It's been going around on the ISCA bbs system
at Iowa that Boomer Esiason has been traded to the Raiders.  Can I get a
verification via e-mail that this did/did not happen?  Thanks.


-- 
--David J.-----------------------*********************************************
--Blue Riddle Productions 1993---   "RAP IS AN ART/TURN UP THE MICROPHONE"
--dwarner@silver.ucs.indiana.edu-          Coming in 1993 from BRP.
---------------------------------*********************************************