HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: anthony@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Anthony J Stieber)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.palmtops
Subject: Re: Security on palmtops ?
Date: 8 Nov 1992 04:18:58 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <LAUB.92Nov7205221@laub.Software.Mitel.COM> laub@Software.Mitel.COM (Boniface Lau) writes:

>The Sharp PC-3000 and PC-3100 also support password protection. When

Thanks, I'll put this in the pcmcia.machines file.

>ACE Technology sells a PCMCIA version of the Stacker. Thus, you get
>password protection on the PCMCIA card as well.

When I talked to ACE and SunDisk they said they were just selling
ordinary Stacker preinstalled on a card.  But the ACE brochure I have
implies that what they sell is somehow different (special code for the
ROM/RAM C: drive).  Do they sell it preinstalled for machines besides
the HP?  I haven't used Stacker myself, does it have some sort of
encryption option?
--
<-:(= Anthony Stieber	anthony@csd4.csd.uwm.edu   uwm!uwmcsd4!anthony
Newsgroups: comp.sys.palmtops
Subject: Re: 95BUDDY 2.3 ANNOUNCEMENT
From: Programmierer@BEIZ.mediatex.ch (055485666: MEDIAtex AG)
Date: 11 Nov 1992 11:18:56 CET
Organization: MEDIAtex AG, CH-8807 Freienbach/SZ

Today I received my copy of 95BUDDY 2.3f.

My first test's are verry good for me, I think it's a verry usefull tool.

The only bad point I found is, that no foreign language is supported.


And Now I have an offer! I would be willing to help setting up a german
version of 95buddy if the author is willing also and there are other
people waiting on a german version of 95buddy.

Peter.





|B                                    B|
|E           CH: VTX *3600#           E|
|I           D:  BTX *28881#          I|
|Z                                    Z|
From: chuck@edsi.plexus.COM (Chuck Tomasi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.palmtops
Subject: Bug in BUDDY v2.3?
Date: 13 Nov 92 15:35:29 GMT
Organization: Enterprise Data Systems Incorporated, Appleton WI

I've recently changed the organization of my C: drive on my 95LX shortly
after getting BUDDY95 installed.  I currently have hidden files on
(files that start with an underscore are not displayed.)  I have also
changed the line in my 95BUDDY.BCF file to tell the Memo app to look in
C:\MEMOS\*.TXT.

What I have found is when I hit MEMO-MEMO I am shown the C:\MEMOS\*.TXT
files and asked which file to open.  If I scroll down to ".." to tell it
to look up one directory (to the root level) it shows me all the
directories (since nothing in my root directory ends with *.TXT.)  If I
select _DAT, I am brought back to my C:\MEMOS directory.

If I use the *.* (F7) key it will show all files in the root directory
and then I can select _DAT as my directory to navigate into.

Has anyone else seen this?

Does everyone else keep all their *.TXT files in C:\_DAT and not really
work about it?

Do I need to change something else or is this a bona fide bug?
-- 
Chuck Tomasi             |   "A munk a clone and a Ferengi
chuck@edsi.plexus.COM    |    decide to go bowling together..."
spool!cserver!edsi!chuck |             -Data "The Outrageous Okana"
------<Enterprise Data Systems Incorporated, Appleton Wisconsin>------
From: anthony@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Anthony J Stieber)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.palmtops
Subject: Re: [HP95] Why doesn't CTTY COM1 work?
Date: 9 Nov 1992 00:39:18 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Nov9.000511.25949@sfu.ca> howesb@monashee.sfu.ca (Charles Howes) writes:

>Umm... where do I find this serint program?

It's in C:\_sys\ along with other useful stuff like the thousand dollar
US bill PCX, DEBUG, and Hearts&Bones (high score 152!).  I guess the CTTY
question is going into the FAQ now.
--
<-:(= Anthony Stieber	anthony@csd4.csd.uwm.edu   uwm!uwmcsd4!anthony
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
From: jim@accelr8.com (Jim Reiss)
Subject: DG/UX v5.4.2 ksh followup
Organization: Accelr8 Technology Corporation
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 18:22:39 GMT

Well, ksh now seems to be working for us with DG/UX 5.4.2, apparently
we needed to add the command "stty line 0" to ".profile".  My old .profile
said "att_stty line 0", which apparently didn't work.  Hope this helps someone
else.
-- 
 Jim Reiss (jim@accelr8.com)    Accelr8 Technology, Denver, Colorado, USA
 Opinions expressed above are mine.  Who else would have them?
From: brennan@hal.com (Dave Brennan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
Subject: Re: "w" command
Date: 6 Nov 92 15:56:08 GMT
Article-I.D.: hysteria.BRENNAN.92Nov6095608
	<1992Oct31.021258.4602@tc.cornell.edu>
	<1992Oct31.050543.24941@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> <Bx2MBK.B5A@news.udel.edu>
Organization: HaL Computer Systems, Austin, TX
NNTP-Posting-Host: hysteria.hal.com
In-reply-to: weave@bach.udel.edu's message of 2 Nov 92 04:11:44 GMT

>>>>> On 2 Nov 92 04:11:44 GMT, weave@bach.udel.edu (Ken Weaverling) said:

> Now, next question: Why isn't there a w command, and does anyone have one!!

Have you tried the "whodo" command?

--
Dave Brennan                                      HaL Computer Systems
brennan@hal.com                                         (512) 794-2855
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
From: weave@bach.udel.edu (Ken Weaverling)
Subject: Re: "w" command
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 00:25:49 GMT

In article <BRENNAN.92Nov6095608@hysteria.hal.com> brennan@hal.com
     (Dave Brennan) writes:
>>>>>> On 2 Nov 92 04:11:44 GMT, weave@bach.udel.edu (Ken Weaverling) said:
>
>> Now, next question: Why isn't there a w command, and does anyone have one!!
>
>Have you tried the "whodo" command?

Not the same.  w gives you

1) The name *AND* arguments of the command running
2) Only shows the most interesting command (usually the one running
   in the foreground) for each user
-- 
Ken Weaverling (Delaware Tech College) weave@dtcc.edu -or- weave@bach.udel.edu

"Is it too late to change the way we're bound to go? Surely one of us must know"
			-- Sandy Denny,  1948-1978
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
From: jim@accelr8.com (Jim Reiss)
Subject: ksh on DG/UX 5.4.2
Organization: Accelr8 Technology Corporation
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:34:10 GMT

We just installed DG/UX v5.4.2, and it seems to have been successful.
There is one big problem, and I was wondering if it sounds familiar to anyone.
Apparently, /bin/sh and /bin/csh work as login shells, while /bin/ksh does
not.  If there is no .profile, ksh hangs up immediately (and then root must
log in and kill the shell).  If there is a .profile, it executes that and
than hangs when it's done.  Anyone have any ideas?  I could build the public
domain Korn shell, but that's not the most desirable solution.  Thanks for
all input.  By the way, ksh works fine if it's not the login shell, as far
as I can tell.
-- 
 Jim Reiss (jim@accelr8.com)    Accelr8 Technology, Denver, Colorado, USA
 Opinions expressed above are mine.  Who else would have them?
From: ggw@wolves.uucp (Gregory G. Woodbury)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
Subject: Re: Motorola Series 8000 Model 8120
Date: 12 Nov 92 05:59:17 GMT
Organization: Wolves Den UNIX
X-Md4-Signature: 8f557fc5b6eaf018e85a14b94d353971

In article <1992Nov08.213234.280775@sue.cc.uregina.ca> hameluck@mercury.cs.uregina.ca (Jeff Hameluck) writes:
>
>	The place that I work for (Regina Public Library) is considering
>purchasing a Motorla 8120 as a general purpose multi-user UNIX machine.
>We are planning to run a BBS system on it, possibly use it as an Oracle
>server and possibly as the server for our Macintosh network.  Any comments
>or suggestions?

	I think the machine is pretty irrelevant in this case (an 88K
will perform just fine in your proposed application)  but I seriously
question the decision to have a public BBS on it, AND to have it be a
file server for a production environment!  Unless you are very confident
of the security of your BBS, I'd worry about trashing (intentional or
unintentional) the production files.  I presume you would add enough
disk capacity to the machine to handle the projected needs.  (BBS space
needs are ALWAYS underestimated!)

>	Is it a pretty standard version of System VR4?  (Referring to V/88)
>How many users can the system typically support (a 25MHz MC88100 with say 16MB)
>Anyone used this as an Appleshare server?  Is this a fairly new system?  Will
>Motorola support it or dump it in the face of the PowerPC?  Is it reliable?
>Any input is appreciated.

	I can't comment on that particular software config, but I have
used a similar machine as an Appleshare server (through a GatorBox)
several times.  The 88100 is about two years old now, so the CPU is
getting a bit passe.  I wish Moto would go ahead and release the 88110
chipset for full production. :-)
-- 
Gregory G. Woodbury @ The Wolves Den UNIX, Durham NC  <Standard disclaimers>
UUCP: ...dukcds!wolves!ggw   ...duke!wolves!ggw           [use the maps!]
Domain: ggw@wolves.Durham.NC.US  ggw%wolves@duke.cs.duke.edu
[This site is *not* affiliated with Duke University.  (Idiots!) ]
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
From: mishra@controls.ccd.harris.com (Sanjoy Mishra)
Subject: Help on Installing SVR4 drivers 
Originator: mishra@sp1
Organization: Harris Controls
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 14:30:21 GMT


Hello:

We have a hardware platform with an 88k plugged into a 32bit VME chassis
and we are trying to port from SVR3 to SVR4.

We are trying to install a hardware driver to talk to other boards in the
chassis with 3 hardware memory address ranges that the 88K needs to talk to:

0x02000000 thru 0x04000000,
0x10000000 thru 0x10100000
0x1e000000 thru 0x1e010000

We successfully installed the driver.   

We use the function iopmapin to determine
a virtual address for each of the three hardware address ranges and then
use these virtual addresses throughout the driver; we assume this is
necessary as opposed to using the hardware addresses like it was in our SVR3
implementation of the driver.

In our init routine for the driver we poke a value in the third address
range and this seems to work, at least the kernel does not panic.

We have an ioctl entry point to read and/or write data to any of the
first two hardware address ranges.  This function is implemented via
copyin, and copyout.   We get a kernel panic anytime we try to read from
the mapped virtual address corresponding to the hardware address 0x2000000.
As part of the kernel panic (CMNU bus error) it prints out the virtual
and physical address; both of which look valid.  

I should also mention we made entries in /stand/edt_data for each of the
three hardware address ranges; based on other edt_data examples.

Has anyone had a similar problem installing a character based hardware driver?
Any suggestions of what to try next or code/edt_data examples would be
be greatly appreciated.

Another problem we are having is the iopmain fails for the address
range 0x2000000 thru 0x4000000 with an error indicating it is out of 
virtual space.  What configuration change do we need to make to support
mapping in this large physical memory area?  (For now we have cut back
the memory area from 32MB to 2MB until we get the driver working)

-Sanjay
______________________________________________________________________________
Sanjay K. Mishra                             Harris Controls Division
mishra@ccd.harris.com                        407 John Rodes Blvd.
Phone: (407)242-4333                         Melbourne, FL 32905
Fax:   (407)242-4268
The opinions expressed are my own and do not in any way represent Harris Corp.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

 
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
From: mishra@controls.ccd.harris.com (Sanjoy Mishra)
Subject: advise
Originator: mishra@sp1
Organization: Harris Controls
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 16:22:14 GMT


Hi

I am looking for a software which redirects the console terminal
message to desired terminal. I am aware of the software advise, has
anyone ported this for M88K SVR4 ? 

Thanks for any help.

-Sanjay
mishra@ccd.harris.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
From: hameluck@mercury.cs.uregina.ca (Jeff Hameluck)
Subject: Motorola Series 8000 Model 8120
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1992 21:32:34 GMT
Organization: University of Regina, SK, Canada

	The place that I work for (Regina Public Library) is considering
purchasing a Motorla 8120 as a general purpose multi-user UNIX machine.
We are planning to run a BBS system on it, possibly use it as an Oracle
server and possibly as the server for our Macintosh network.  Any comments
or suggestions?

	Is it a pretty standard version of System VR4?  (Referring to V/88)
How many users can the system typically support (a 25MHz MC88100 with say 16MB)
Anyone used this as an Appleshare server?  Is this a fairly new system?  Will
Motorola support it or dump it in the face of the PowerPC?  Is it reliable?
Any input is appreciated.

	The machine I am sending this from is a MIPS RC3330 running RISCos 5.0
does any one know how the two would compare?

Thanks.

Jeff Hameluck
hameluck@cs.uregina.ca
University of Regina
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
Subject: Need 88k S/W Info
From: ray@grumpy.ksc.nasa.gov (Ray Ho)
Date: 13 Nov 92 12:31:00 EST
Distribution: usa
Organization: MDA-KSC

Hi 88kers,

I just started a new assignment that needs to evaluate all commercially 
available s/w, or public domain s/w, that runs on 88k machine, and in the 
real time control, monitoring, GUI, database areas. My target machine will 
be Harris Night Hawk.

Any info is welcome and appreciated.

---
Ray Ho
MDA-KSC
ray@grumpy.ksc.nasa.gov
---
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
From: machardy@batmobil.rtp.dg.com (Earle T. Machardy)
Subject: Re: "w" command
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 13:13:37 GMT
Organization: Data General Corporation, RTP, NC.

In article <BxFAJ2.Hpv@news.udel.edu> weave@bach.udel.edu (Ken Weaverling) writes:
>In article <BRENNAN.92Nov6095608@hysteria.hal.com> brennan@hal.com
>     (Dave Brennan) writes:
>>>>>>> On 2 Nov 92 04:11:44 GMT, weave@bach.udel.edu (Ken Weaverling) said:
>>
>>> Now, next question: Why isn't there a w command, and does anyone have one!!
>>
>>Have you tried the "whodo" command?
>
>Not the same.  w gives you
>
>1) The name *AND* arguments of the command running
>2) Only shows the most interesting command (usually the one running
>   in the foreground) for each user

The "w" command uses /dev/kmem and directly reads the process table.
Since the DG/UX process table is of a different construction than the
one in BSD, it would probably be a difficult port.  

I suppose that dg_process_info could be used to provide the information
from the process table though.  I think "w" was left out because it was
in the BSD command set and not in the AT&T command set.
Earle MacHardy				919-248-6080
Data General Corporation		FAX:  919-248-5942
62 T.W. Alexander Drive			machardy@dg-rtp.dg.com
Research Triangle Park, NC  27709	...!uunet!dg-rtp.dg.com!machardy
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
From: jpe@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (John Paul Elrod)
Subject: Porting xntp3 to DG/UX 5.41
Reply-To: jpe@jhuspo.ca.jhu.edu (John Paul Elrod)
Organization: Johns Hopkins University, Research Administration Services
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 21:18:01 GMT

I'm trying to port xntp3 to a Data General Aviion 5240 running
DG/UX 5.41 (a SVR4 derivative).  There isn't a Config file for DG/UX in
the source I obtained, and my efforts to create one have not been very
successful.  Has anybody ever ported xntp3 to DG/UX?  Or does anyone
know of a Config.dgux file in any archive site?  In the alternative, is there
a more generic SVR4 Config file somewhere?  Thanks in advance.

-- 
John Paul Elrod                     -    jpe@jhuspo.ca.jhu.edu
Information Systems Manager         -    (410) 516-8732
Research Administration Services    -    300 Whitehead Hall
Johns Hopkins University            -    Baltimore, Maryland 21218
From: dhandly@hpcuhe.cup.hp.com (Dennis Handly)
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 04:09:41 GMT
Subject: Re: hpterm's cut and paste
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Cal Language Lab
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp

>/ sasbge@unx.sas.com (Gantt Edmiston) /  6:33 pm  Nov  5, 1992 /
>>One other thing to do is to go into the resource settings and define
>>Shift-Left, Shift-Right, and Shift-Middle to trigger the same actions
>>as Left, Right, and Middle.

>Yea, this will work, but I'd rather have HP fix the problem. 
>(or is it a "feature"?)

Obviously this is a feature.  It lets you double the number of mouse keys.
:-)

When I read the base note I immediately thought of the shift- solution.
But for some strange reason I've never done it.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
From: rkraga01@romulus.spd.louisville.edu (Dr. Ragade)
Subject: Re: HP-UX publicly available software (update #13)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 17:47:52 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In <1992Nov9.153951.16530@news.uiowa.edu> librarian@iworks.ecn.uiowa.edu (InterWorks librarian) writes:
Dave: thought you might be interested in t
>The following is a list of new (or updated) entries (since my last posting),
>of UX-related software on the InterWorks library node (iworks.ecn.uiowa.edu--
>128.255.18.10). Note that everything is available via anonymous ftp-- in 
>"comp.hp"). The README there contains a complete list of the available 
>software.

>All the following is supposed to be suitable for the 700 series, and I
>have started to verify that. Executables are included in some packages.
>If you take a package and find that you must build an executable (or do
>some porting) for your machine and/or OS level, I would appreciate
>hearing about your work and receiving a copy of the executable you built.

>Note that I have had very little involvement in the writing or packaging 
>of any of the items on the list-- they are the result of the work of many 
>other people. In particular, note that the available binaries have not
>been compiled by me. If you are concerned about running binaries compiled
>by someone else, build them yourself with the available source. Also note 
>that individual authors may include text regarding the rights of others
>to use and distribute their code. 

>Thanks to all the contributors.

>    329877     GNUmake-3.55.tar.Z
>                  The GNU version of the "make" utility.

>    236715     GNUtar-1.10.tar.Z
>                  The GNU version of tar, with some fixes for HP-UX.

>    210935     ee.tar.Z
>                  An HP (unofficial) user-friendly text editor, suitable
>                  for both 68k and PA-RISC machines

>     13588     ssh-1.3.tar.Z
>                  Splits, strips and extracts appended shell-archives.

>    774801     tcsh-6.02.tar.Z
>                  A version of the Berkeley C-Shell, with the addition of
>                  a command line editor, command and file name completion, etc.

>     32182     traceroute_1.17.tar.Z
>                  Determine the current Internet hops to a given address

>    988465     xfig-2.1.tar.Z
>                  A menu-driven tool that allows the user to draw and
>                  manipulate objects interactively in an X window.

>   1045507     xgo.tar.Z
>                  An X-based version of the ancient Chinese board game

>   1240970     xntp.tar.Z
>                  Synchronize your node clocks with Internet standard time.

>     77453     xstones.tar.Z
>                  A benchmark for X servers-- a test of graphic performance
>                  (not a test of overall workstation performance).

>     56846     xtalk.tar.Z
>                  An X11 implementation of 4.3 BSD talk.
From: neal@ctd.comsat.com (Neal Becker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: Re: Entire contents of the Liverpool HP-UX archive
Date: 5 Nov 92 15:01:06 GMT
Organization: COMSAT Labs
NNTP-Posting-Host: neal.ctd.comsat.com
In-reply-to: rkl@csc.liv.ac.uk's message of 2 Nov 92 13:28:37 GMT
X-Md4-Signature: 2a30c1482181687002700a36b0d44206

A couple of notes (from our hp9000/7xx collection)

1.  The current emacs (18.59) works fine as distributed

2.  We have had SERIOUS problems with gnu tar.  I recommend you get
gnu cpio instead.  Its much cleaner anyway.

3.  You may want inn-1.2 instead of cnews/nntp.  inn-1.2 works fine on
hp.

4. The latest rdist is available from usc.edu.  It works fine on hpux
(thanks to me).

5. The latest xntp3 can be gotten from udel.edu in /pub/ntp.  It has
hpux support.

6. You may want to try SeeTex-2.18.5 instead of xdvi.  SeeTex uses
native X11 fonts instead of trying to translate mf -> X in real time.
This produces much higher quality (IMHO), and is much faster.
From: galeana@nauvax.ucc.nau.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: HELP HP 42s
Date: 12 Nov 92 05:26:16 GMT
Organization: Northern Arizona University

I'm posting this for an friend.

I need info on where to find programs for the HP 42s Handheld calculator.
Specifically for engineering subjects like stress analysis.

Thanks for your help.


I'm not sure If I should be posting this here, but it looked OK.

Reply to me, and I'll forward any replies to him.  Thanks
From: k@hprnd.rose.hp.com (Steve Kao)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: Re: HP printer questions?
Date: 2 Nov 92 18:10:42 GMT
Organization: HP Roseville Networks Division

The LJ-4 is also less expensive than the LJ-3.

- Steve Kao
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
From: pld@fc.hp.com (Paul_Dineen)
Subject: Re: compiler bus error
Organization: HP CLO/CoLL, Fort Collins, CO
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]
Distribution: ca
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 16:58:32 GMT

> uname -a
HP-UX hpcolls1 A.09.00 A 9000/720 hpcolls1 two-user license
		  ^^^
> cat foo.c
extern struct pstate q1[],q2[],q3[];
struct pstate {
        int a;
};
> cc -c foo.c
>
Lines: 48
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 08:40:17 MST
From: gritton@alaska.et.byu.edu (Jamie Gritton)
Organization: Brigham Young University, Provo UT USA
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: Re: How to use pstat() in HP-UX 8.0x?
Reply-To: gritton@byu.edu
Distribution: world

   I've played around with pstat() a bit, and while I may not have found
out all there is to find, here's what I know:



   There are three structures used by the call, pst_status,
pst_static, and pst_dynamic. You call it different ways to get
different information.

   The static and dynamic structures contain information about the
kernel and the machine. As their names imply, the static structure
contains information that won't change at least until reboot or
reconfiguration, and the dynamic structure contains information that
constantly changes. Look in the include file for specific fields. Of
particular interest is the max_proc field in the static structure.

   The call to get this information is:

struct pst_static pstatic;
pstat( PSTAT_STATIC, &pstatic, sizeof pstatic, 0, 0);

   The pst_status structure, as mentioned in the header file, can be
called two ways; you can get information about a certain process, or
all processes. The information returned is everything that you ever
wanted to know about the process. To get a single process:

struct pst_status pstatus;
int pid;
pstat( PSTAT_PROC, &pstatus, sizeof pstatus, 0, pid)

   To get part of the process table:

struct pst_status pst[NPROC];
int index, nproc;
nproc = pstat( PSTAT_PROC, pst, sizeof *pst, NPROC, index);

   This will get entries of the process table from index to
index+NPROC-1, or less if you go past the currest size of the table. I
think (I may be wrong -- it's been a while) that the table has PIDs in
numerical order. The call will return the actual number of pst_status
structures written into the array. To get the full process table, use:

struct pst_status *pst;
int index, nproc;
pst = malloc( pstatic.max_proc * sizeof *pst);
nproc = pstat( PSTAT_PROC, pst, sizeof *pst, pstatic.max_proc, index);
--
James Gritton - gritton@byu.edu - I disclaim
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
From: marshall@ll.mit.edu (Hunter Marshall)
Subject: Do previous criticism's of HP-UX apply to 9.0 ?
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Distribution: comp
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 09:10:54 -0500

A thread has been slightly flaming HP-UX and HP's patch practices.
While the latter probably hasn't changed, does HP-UX 9.0 fare better
as a un*x?

	hunter