From: rdorocke@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (rob lawrence dorocke)
Subject: Re: Dan's BOOK!
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 06:23:29 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.042441.13803@pony.Ingres.COM> garrett@Ingres.COM (IF YOU CANNOT CONVINCE THEM, CONFUSE THEM) writes:
>In article <C18Bnv.HII@umassd.edu>, acsca@UMASSD.EDU                                           writes...
>>In article <1993Jan15.154935.13395@VFL.Paramax.COM>, train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge) writes:
>>>In article <N67DXB1w165w@unkaphaed.gbdata.com>, popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com 
>>>(William C. Barwell) writes:
>>>>       >  BTW, since the election, I've noticed that among the people I know who
>>>>>>      were staunch supporters of the last regieme there appear to be symptoms
>>>>>>      of a major hangover.  Call it "Morning After In America."  I've come to 
>>>>>>      the conclusion that many of these people are just starting to wake up to
>>>>>>      the fact that they were thoroughly deceived during the last twelve years.
>>>>>>      Anyway, it's just a thought.  Anyone else notice anything similar?
>>>
>>Just to inform you, I'm not a republican, or a conservative.
>>But the eighties were a decade of prosperity, and I don't care what the media, or Bill Clinton says.
>>------I remember
>
>Well, I remember the 80's too. I remember my family loosing our house
>because my dad couldn't find any work. I also remember not being able to
>feed myself properly for months at a time because I couldn't even get a 
>minimum wage job. And both of those things happened smack dab in middle of
>what the "liberal media" was calling "the longest peacetime expansion in
>America's history". If it was truely a "decade of prosperity" then maybe
>that was only in your neck of the woods. For my family, and that includes
>aunts, uncles, cousins, and close friends, the 80's were a disaster. And I
>will never forgive Reagan or Bush (mostly Reagan).


And that was all Bush's fault, huh?  It is not his fault that you could not 
get a job at McDonalds.  Certain times are not perfect for everyone.
That's how life is.


>
>>I think Bush was lowsy, and Quayle was an idiot, but I think Slick Willy is
>>a truthless Commi, panzy, and Al Gore is 
>>just a living corpse.
>
>Gore comment aside, you don't know what you are talking about. If you think
>Clinton is a commi, then you are so far to the right that you have lost
>touch with reality. Clinton is a moderate, aka Dixicrat. If you want to 
>know what a commi is in power then you must leave the country because there
>is none in America.

Didn't Clinton do this during the Vietnam War??  Hmmmm.  Even the sight
of an American burining a flag is sad.  Let alone, when that person ends
up in the Whit House.


>
>>Look the past 3 years were lousy, but look at the global economy.
>>(sorry you can't blame Reagan-Bush)
>
>Oh! And why can't I? It seems like the right-wingers liked to blame 
>Carter for a couple of light recessions even though the world was in
>a recession. So that doesn't apply to Reagan-Bush?
>
>>And remember Bush had been president for only 4 years, not 12
>>so you left wing communist democrats
>
>Communist Democrats is an oxymoron (look in the dictionary if you don't 
>believe me). Kind of like political right-wing independent thought.
>
>>(not all democrats are like you, but you do have a majority)
>>better get your act together, because I don't think Clinton is exactly
>>what you want either.
>
>I'll agree with you there. He's far to moderate for me.
>> 
>>                                        catch you later
>-Garrett