HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: michael@ccat.sas.upenn.edu (Michael Nenashev)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: mksysb backup without /home
Date: 21 Nov 92 00:44:48 GMT
Organization: School of Arts and Sciences, UPENN


Sorry if this is a common knowledge, but mksysb is a simple
shell script that uses find to create the archive list, so it
is not too hard to modify in to your liking. While I am at it
may I ask you aixperts how to untar a single file from bootable
tape made with standard mksysb ? I tried tctl -f /dev/rmt0.1 fsf n
with n=1,2,3,4 and all combinations of dd I can think of, but it
never lets me stop after this dummy TOC and use tar -xf ... :-(

Thanx for all helpful hints.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: haedener@iacrs1.unibe.ch (Konrad Haedener)
Subject: stat() bug or feature in 3.2.1+ ?
Reply-To: haedener@iacrs1.unibe.ch
Organization: University of Berne
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:40:56 GMT

The following test program apparently behaves differently under AIX 3.2.0
and under my updated 3.2.1 + addtnl PTFs.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <errno.h>

char t_line1[]="/dev/ptc";
char t_line2[]="/dev/ptc/0";
char t_line3[]="/dev/ptyp0";

main()
{
  
   int r_stat;
   struct stat statbuf;

   printf("Testing `stat()' on %s ...:   ", t_line1);
   r_stat = stat(t_line1, &statbuf);
   printf("r_stat is %d and errno is %d\n", r_stat, errno);
   errno=0;

   printf("Testing `stat()' on %s ...: ", t_line2);
   r_stat = stat(t_line2, &statbuf);
   printf("r_stat is %d and errno is %d\n", r_stat, errno);
   errno=0;

   printf("Testing `stat()' on %s ...: ", t_line3);
   r_stat = stat(t_line3, &statbuf);
   printf("r_stat is %d and errno is %d\n\n", r_stat, errno);
   errno=0;

   printf("Testing `lstat()' on %s ...:   ", t_line1);
   r_stat = lstat(t_line1, &statbuf);
   printf("r_stat for is %d and errno is %d\n",  r_stat, errno);
   errno=0;

   printf("Testing `lstat()' on %s ...: ", t_line2);
   r_stat = lstat(t_line2, &statbuf);
   printf("r_stat is %d and errno is %d\n", r_stat, errno);
   errno=0;

   printf("Testing `lstat()' on %s ...: ", t_line3);
   r_stat = lstat(t_line3, &statbuf);
   printf("r_stat is %d and errno is %d\n", r_stat, errno);
}


Testing `stat()' on /dev/ptc ...:   r_stat is 0 and errno is 0
Testing `stat()' on /dev/ptc/0 ...: r_stat is -1 and errno is 5  <<<<<<<<<<<<
Testing `stat()' on /dev/ptyp0 ...: r_stat is -1 and errno is 5  <<<<<<<<<<<<

Testing `lstat()' on /dev/ptc ...:   r_stat for is 0 and errno is 0
Testing `lstat()' on /dev/ptc/0 ...: r_stat is -1 and errno is 5
Testing `lstat()' on /dev/ptyp0 ...: r_stat is 0 and errno is 0

crw-rw-rwT   1 root     system    23,  0 Jul 13 13:41 /dev/ptc
crw-rw-rwT   1 root     system    22,  0 Jul 13 13:41 /dev/pts
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     system        10 Jul 13 13:41 /dev/ptyp0 -> /dev/ptc/0

The above output is from the updated system. Under 3.2 gold, /dev/ptc/0
seems to have looked different to stat() (sorry to be vague, I don't have a
3.2.0 system at hand). Should we settle with this or is it a bug ?
-- 
Konrad Haedener                             Phone: +41 31 65 42 25
Institute for Physical Chemistry            FAX:   +41 31 65 39 94
University of Berne
Switzerland                                 haedener@iacrs1.unibe.ch
From: daniel@NEWTON.baruch.cuny.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: **Help FORTRAN filter option?**
Date: 18 Nov 92 20:17:47 GMT



I am interested in printing output from a FORTRAN printout
where the first column stands for the page breaks.  Is there a 
filter option for lp or lpr?  I did not see any listings for
FORTAN output.  If there is a filter option, or another command
I would greatly appreciate the information regarding this subject.


From:

Daniel Rios					"...From one word to the other
e-mail: daniel@newton.baruch.cuny.edu	 	    what I say vanishes.
voice:						    I know that I am alive
	W: 212 447-3047				    Between two parenthesis"

							  Octavio Paz
From: konopik@konopik.austin.ibm.com (Brad Konopik)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: Question: What happens when a Terminal is powered-down?
Keywords: aix sigterm runaway pseudoterminals dynix UniVerse powerdown
Date: 19 Nov 92 17:46:14 GMT
Organization: IBM AIX Porting Center, Austin

In article <319@westmx.westmont.edu> rodkey@westmont.EDU (John Rodkey) writes:
>
>I have this setup:  RS/6000 mod 530, AIX 3.1.6, UniVerse 5.4, DYNIX v. 1??
>Access to the RS/6000 from terminals is through Emulex and Lantronix 
>Network terminal servers.  This problem occurs on both, so I have made
>the assumption that the NTSs are not the weak link.
>
>The terminals (wyse 50's, PCs w/ emulation, etc.) are accessing the
>RS/6000 in order to run the Library public access catalog, which is one
>of the options in a ksh menu program.
>DYNIX, the catalog program,  is using the UniVerse implementation of
>Pick, which is in turn layered over AIX.
>
>Here's the problem:  when the users are done with the public catalog,
>they sometimes turn off the terminal, which creates a 'cpu-hog' on our
>system iff the user was using DYNIX at the time the plug was pulled.
>
>By CPU hog, I mean that its number of cpu clicks on ps -ef, C column is
>between 20 and 120 (normally a cpu-intensive process shows about 12
>clicks - but if there are 20 hogs, each may have only 9, for example).
>
>Clearly I need to get to the bottom of this problem.  Killing processes
>is repetitive, timewasting, etc.  
>
>SO!  The question is:  what signals are issued to processes associated
>with a pty when the terminal powers down?  How does one handle those
>signals to avoid the problem described? How does ksh handle these differently
>than sh?
>

Rather than answer your question directly, I'll just tell you that Austin
Defect Support's tty guy made a recent change in how orphaned processes
are handled, to eliminate alot of the CPU hog stuff.  Looking at the 
problem tracking information, I see that this fix is not yet built for
AIX 3.1 (so it's going to be a long time before you see it).  If you 
move to AIX 3.2, you'll want to ask for PTF U406391 (for APAR ix23574).
Abstract: PROCESSES NOT KILLED WHEN SHELL, TELNET, TN, RLOGIN DIES.

-- 
  tcpnet: konopik@konopik.austin.ibm.com  |  Brad Konopik
 ibmvnet: KONOPIK at AUSTIN               |  IBM AIX Porting Center, Austin
internet: konopik.austin.ibm.com!konopik@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com
   uunet: ..!uunet!ibmsupt!ibmpa!konopik.austin.ibm.com!konopik
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: jak@sactoh0.sac.ca.us (Jay A. Konigsberg)
Subject: Direct connect of RS600 3.2 and Xenix 2.3.2 - uucp problem
Summary: uucico on AIX dumps to login (even when run from the command line)
Organization: Sacramento Public Access Unix, Sacramento, Ca.
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 22:20:09 GMT


We just setup an RS/6000 AIX 3.2 for a development box (sigh without
modems, modem lines or X.25 :-( ). So to connect it to the rest of the
Wide-Area-Network I made a direct wire connection to my Xenix box.

cu will allow me to get into the AIX from Xenix and uucp will login
and run uucico, but once uucp is in it returns to login.

If I login to AIX as root and run "/usr/lib/uucp/uucico" (no args) I would
expect it to respond with:

Shere=mtsdev

and hang. This would be good because uucico is behaving as exected. However,
it returns be to a login prompt. Thats strange because I would have expected
to get my root prompt back.

For testing I'm using "uucp" as the login with no password and the entry
in /etc/passwd is "uucp::5:5:UUCP admin:/usr/lib/uucp:/usr/lib/uucp/uucico".
I've also used:
"UUmtsdp:!:5:5:mtsdp uucp login:/usr/spool/uucppublic:/usr/lib/uucp/uucico".
Which is the one that will become active.


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jay @ SAC-UNIX, Sacramento, Ca.   UUCP=...pacbell!sactoh0!jak
If something is worth doing, it's worth doing correctly.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: A6261GAQ@vm.univie.ac.at (HAEFELE GEORG)
Subject: lex - problems with floats ?
Organization: University of Vienna
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:38:23 GMT

I compiled some programs (eg. netcdf, udunits from unidata.ucar.edu)
which read from an ascii file using the lex utility (AIX3.2).
Now if the ascii file contains floats or doubles they will be truncated
(e.g. 0.3432 will get 0,3  or in the worst case 0).
Using flex returns the correct values, but some programs depend on
linecount (yylineno) which is not part of flex (?).
Can anybody give me an advise how to solve this problem.

Thanks in advance

Haefele Georg
Department of Geography
University of Vienna
From: dkf@chem.ucsd.edu (David Knight French)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: Simple EOF problem?
Date: 19 Nov 92 02:52:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: network.1eevguINN9hm
Organization: University of California San Diego, Chemistry
NNTP-Posting-Host: chedccf0.ucsd.edu

In article <BxvzEE.79B@acsu.buffalo.edu> vidya-v@acsu.buffalo.edu (vidyaranya) writes:
>
>The following piece of code FAILS to detect End of File
>under AIX(i dont know the version currently!) running on
>an IBM PowerServer 970.
>------
>	char	buffer[2048];
>	int	i;
>	FILE	*fp;
>
>	i=0;
>        while( (buffer[i++]=fgetc(fp))!= EOF )
>         ;
>------
>Exactly same piece of code runs on a SparcStationIPC running
>SunOS 4.1.2 .
>
>What could be the problem?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Vidyaranya
>vidya-v@acsu.buffalo.edu

The problem is that the RS/6000 has unsigned characters.  Since EOF is
-1 this means the test in your while will never complete.  Here is how
I would code the above while:

	while( (buffer[i++]=fgetc(fp), ! feof(fp))

I found this same problem in a program we tried to port to AIX v3.2 and
I solved the problem as I show here.  At the time I didn't know that the
RS/6000 had unsigned characters, but the following excerpt from "XPG4-Wide
Characters" by Jeffreys Copeland & Haemer in the Nov92 edition of RS/Magazine
explains it:

	     Some hardware (like the RS/6000) has unsigned characters.  Since
	EOF is -1, this means that the following loop is guaranteed to never
	complete:
		
		char c;
		while ( (c = getchar()) != EOF )
			putchar( c );

	Of course, getchar() returns an int, and putchar() takes an int as its
	argument, so the correct loop is:

		int ci;
		while ( (ci = getchar()) != EOF )
			putchar( ci );

I would assume the Sparc uses a signed char.

Hope this helps,
			--Dave

-- 
David Knight French		Email Addresses:		Phone:	
UCSD - Dept of Chemistry	INTERNET: dkfrench@ucsd.edu	  (voice/fax)
9500 Gilman Drive		UUCP:     ucsd!dkfrench		(619)534-4193 /
San Diego, CA  92093-0314	BITNET:   dkfrench@ucsd.bitnet	(619)534-6255
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: jdschn@nicsn1.monsanto.com (John D Schneider)
Subject: automounter under AIX 3.2.3
Organization: Monsanto Company
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 20:20:50 GMT

We just recently got in a new RS/6000 and installed 3.2.3 on it.  I have
been trying to get the automounter to work to mount a disk on another 
RS/6000 running 3.1.5.  On the client system I have a file called
/etc/auto.direct (to be consistant with the Sun convention) that contains:

# cat /etc/auto.direct
dir1            rw      asdrs1:/usr/local/dir1
dir2            rw      asdrs1:/usr/local/dir2

I have created the /usr/remote directory and /usr/remote/dir1 and /usr
/remote/dir2 directories on the client.  I have exported the /usr directory
on the server (asdrs1) so I know I have access from the client.  I have tried
mounting and unmounting this filesystem manually, so I have no doubt that the
server permits the filesystem to be mounted by the client.

I started the automounter with:

/usr/sbin/automount /usr/remote /etc/auto.direct

and it seemed to start just fine.  But when I cd down to /usr/remote on the
client there is nothing there. The dir1 and dir2 which I just created have 
disappeared.   A df shows:

# df
Filesystem    Total KB    free %used   iused %iused Mounted on
/dev/hd4          8192    3260   60%     809    39% /
/dev/hd2        602112   92084   84%   25272    16% /usr
/dev/hd9var       4096    3152   23%      63     6% /var
/dev/hd3         12288   11708    4%      28     0% /tmp
/dev/hd30       380928  368812    3%      17     0% /usr4
asdrs2.monsanto.com:(pid18867)       0       0   -1%   -       -    /usr/remote

which shows that the automounter is running.

Does anyone have a suggestion as to what is going wrong?  The setup I am
using is almost exactly identical to the automounter example given in info.
I can't see any substantive difference, except that it doesn't work.

I have not tried the automounter under any other release of AIX, since we just
now got in a situation where we need it.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  Please post your responses to
me and I will summarize for the group.

John

*******************************************************************************
*  John D. Schneider                Internet: jdschn@nicsn1.monsanto.com      *
*  Research Computing Consortium    Telephone: (314)537-6808                  *
*  Monsanto Company - Mail Zone GG3I _________________________________________*
*  700 Chesterfield Parkway North   | "No sciences are better tested than     *
*  St. Louis, Missouri 63198        |  the religion of the Bible."            *
*                                   |                   - Sir Isaac Newton    *
*******************************************************************************
From: accapadi@mathew.austin.ibm.com (Matt Accapadi)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: Remote Installp
Date: 20 Nov 92 23:48:42 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <BxGt50.Avn@mcigate.apdev.mci.com> rmwise@mcigate.apdev.mci.com (Bob_Wise) writes:
>
>Given:
>
>1) RS/6000 #1 with 8mm tape drive
>2) RS/6000 #2 with no 8mm tape drive
>3) An 8mm 3.2.2 or 3.2.3 tape
>
>What is the best way to upgrade RS/6000 #2 to
>AIX 3.2.2 or 3.2.3?
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>| Bob Wise          | INET:622-1322 | MCIMail:rmwise | Pager:719-577-1928 |
>| Unix Consultant   |-----------------------------------------------------|
>| Consultant to MCI | Phone:719-592-1322 | Internet:rmwise@apdev.mci.com  |



Well, I'm going to assume that you have an internal 8mm tape drive.  If not,
you could always move the external (shutting down the system first of course -
don't ever hotwire).

If it is internal, then that could be moved also; it's just a little more
painful.

The other option is to dd each of the images off the tape and put it on either
one of the systems.
-- 
Matt Accapadi                            Internet: accapadi@austin.ibm.com
IBM AWD AIX System Performance           VNET:  ACCAPADI at AUSTIN
11400 Burnet Rd. Bld. 906/9632           yaknet: 512-838-3193  Tie 678-3193
Austin, TX 78758-3493                    fax: 512-838-8344
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: haedener@iacrs1.unibe.ch (Konrad Haedener)
Subject: Re: Simple EOF problem?
Reply-To: haedener@iacrs1.unibe.ch
Organization: University of Berne
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 07:49:16 GMT

In article <BxvzEE.79B@acsu.buffalo.edu>, vidya-v@acsu.buffalo.edu (vidyaranya) writes:
|> 
|> The following piece of code FAILS to detect End of File
|> under AIX(i dont know the version currently!) running on
|> an IBM PowerServer 970.
|> ------
|> 	char	buffer[2048];
|> 	int	i;
|> 	FILE	*fp;
|> 
|> 	i=0;
|>         while( (buffer[i++]=fgetc(fp))!= EOF )
|>          ;
|> ------
|> Exactly same piece of code runs on a SparcStationIPC running
|> SunOS 4.1.2 .
|> 
|> What could be the problem?

fgetc returns int.
EOF is (-1).

|> 
|> Thanks.
|> 
|> Vidyaranya
|> vidya-v@acsu.buffalo.edu

-- 
Konrad Haedener                             Phone: +41 31 65 42 25
Institute for Physical Chemistry            FAX:   +41 31 65 39 94
University of Berne
Switzerland                                 haedener@iacrs1.unibe.ch
From: russotto@vnet.ibm.com (Matthew T. Russotto)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 09:00:30 EST
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: warnings from 'ld' when building shared lib
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0

In <478@bertha.HyperDesk.com> Andy Dennie writes:
>I'm trying to create a shared library from a bunch of .o's and some
>.a's.  When I do, I get a bunch of warnings like:
>
>0706-223 WARNING:  Local definition of 'foo' replaced by import version.
>
>My link line looks like:
>
>  ld -bM:SRE -o shared_lib foo1.o foo2.o libfoo3.a libfoo4.a -E foo.exp
>
>The file foo.exp contains the symbols the shared library is to export.
>The function 'foo' I'm getting the warning about is not one of them, if
>that matters.  Can anybody explain what is going on here?  Thanks.


You need the 'suppress annoying warnings' option, "-bh:4".
From: mcguire@selway.umt.edu (Charles J McGuire)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: AIX sendmail bug
Date: 19 Nov 92 17:16:04 GMT
Article-I.D.: selway.1992Nov19.171604.28018
Organization: University of Montana

In article <BxvGCI.6GC@math.uwaterloo.ca> mskucher@math.uwaterloo.ca (Murray S. Kucherawy [MFCF]) writes:
>The stock sendmail on AIX doesn't appear to honour MX record
>references when "OK ALL" is used as an option.  Are there any known bugs with
>MX record handling in AIX sendmail?
>
I use OK ALL at AIX 3.2, and my sendmail does use MX records to route
mail. When I make changes, I run /usr/lib/sendmail -bz to rebuild
the sendmail frozen config file, then run refresh -s sendmail to 
rehup sendmail.


 *************************************************************************
( Charlie McGuire              |       Tel.  : (406) 243-4618             )
( Research Sys Mgr             |       Fax   : (406) 243-4076             )
( The University of Montana    |                                          )
( Computer Science Dept        |       E-Mail: mcguire@huckle.cs.umt.edu  )
( SS409                        |                                          )
 *************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: henkel@nepjt.ne.ncsu.edu (Chuck Henkel)
Subject: Anyone have a Wren VI on their RS/6000?
Reply-To: csh@lanl.gov
Organization: North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 14:30:16 GMT

I'd like to attach a Seagate ST4766N (formerly called a 94191-766 or
Wren VI) to our 520.

Has anyone done this? If so, do you recall what jumper setting you
used? In particular, pin pairs 8 and 9 control "termination power
option" and "termination power from drive." How should I set these?

When I received the disk, the top pin of pair 8 was jumpered to the
top pin of pair 9. This confuses me.

Any info, even a simple "Yes, I've done it", would be appreciated.

--
Chuck Henkel
Westinghouse Savannah River Company                      
csh@lanl.gov
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: jones@chpc.utexas.edu (Willaim L. Jones)
Subject: Have you noticed!
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 23:31:31 GMT

Has any once noticed that /usr/bin/X11/xterm whil bash the boot time entry
/etc/utmp in AIX 3.2.2?

It takes several tries.

Bill Jones
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: pim@cti-software.nl (Pim Zandbergen)
Subject: How to set up RTS/CTS flow control for bidirectional modem
Organization: CTI Software BV, The Hague, The Netherlands
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 16:10:24 GMT

Maybe this is something for the FAQ if there were to be any.

How do I set up a port for RTS/CTS flow control permanently ?

I know about "stty add rts", but I can't add "add rts" to the
run time settings in SMIT. 

I need hardware flow control to be set up for both incoming
and outgoing calls. 

AIX is 3.1.5, 2006 fix.
Modem is Telebit Trailblazer T2500.
Serial line is on a 16-port concentrator.
-- 
Pim Zandbergen                      domain : pim@cti-software.nl
CTI Software BV                     uucp   : uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!ctisbv!pim
Laan Copes van Cattenburch 70       phone  : +31 70 3542302
2585 GD The Hague, The Netherlands  fax    : +31 70 3512837
From: bware@slate.mines.colorado.edu (Bob Ware)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: /tmp Corrupted
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:14:44 GMT
Organization: Colorado School of Mines

We have been experiencing problems where the df command does not seem
to accurately indicate the available space in a filesystem.  The df
command indicated lots of free space, but attempts to copy a small file
to the filesystem gave an error meesage indicating we were out of
space.

In trying to track down what is happening, I was looking for files
which were open but not named and ran across something that I don't
understand.

We have a dbm file that seems unexpectedly large based on the "ls -l"
output.  However, the "du -s" command gives about what I would expect.

The typescript file shown below seems to indicate that the udb.pag file
is over 200 MB in size based on "ls -l" but the "du -s" command shows
it is only about 16 MBlks (512 blks).  Similar data for a regular text
file (udb.txt) shows more what I would expect.

Are dbm files handled as some sort of "sparse" files and that explains these
results??  That does not make sense to me, because the size from "ls -l"
for this file (udb.dbm) seemed reasonable before today, and I don't think
the file is any more "sparse" than it was before.

Has anyone else seen something like this.  Any ideas on what is going on?

...... output from script command ....................................
$ ls -l udb.pag
-rw-r-----   1 root     udbadmin 219312128 Nov 18 06:27 udb.pag
$ du -s udb.pag
16712	udb.pag
$ fuser udb.pag
udb.pag: 

$ ls -l udb.txt
-rw-rw----   1 root     system   2470120 Nov 18 06:29 udb.txt
$ du -s udb.txt
4832	udb.txt
$ fuser udb.txt
udb.txt: 


-- 
Bob Ware, System Administrator 
Computing and Networking, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Co 80401, USA
(303) 273-3987
bware@mines.colorado.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: tkevans@fallst (Tim Evans)
Subject: Re: PTFs on installation servers
Reply-To: tkevans@eplrx7.es.dupont.com
Organization: Tim Evans
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 13:55:59 GMT

frank@leopard.austin.ibm.com (Frank Feuerbacher) writes:

>In article <1992Nov18.123530.39@rcwusr>, jenkinsonjp@rcwusr.bp.com writes:
>> i had gotten into the habit of rolling the various and insundry PTF tapes to
>> a common directory on a machine we had setup as an installation server. once
>> done i'd then go the various RS/6000s and install all patches with commit,etc.
>> my theory was that any PTFs that i had loaded previously would be overwritten
>> and the installp would take care of the prerequisite strings. this worked fine
>> until they started to recend PTFs. just recently we got a tape with a BUNCH
>> of fixes for the 220 and GT1 (bloody thing just didn't work). in doing the
>> enmass PTF apply, i ended up with a pile of garbage. reloading the machine and
>> applying the PTFs from tape, one tape at a time, the machine works fine.
>> how do others apply PTFs to a large population of machines??

>Did you read the memo to users and follow it's instructions?  Whatever you do, be sure
>to apply the latest fix to installp first!  There was a major change made to enable
>superseding PTFs with PTF U406852.  This PTF, or one that supersedes it, MUST be
>applied first!  This PTF also has a performance and memory leak fix for installp.

Also, note that the smit option to "load software to hard disk for future
installation" runs 'bffcreate' and that this is supposed to dynamically
expand the filesystem as needed as you load the PTF's from tape.  
THIS DOES NOT WORK!  If you have a failure loading the PTF's from
tape, this is probably the reason why.  You need to 'chfs' the file-
system in advance, making enough space available for the PTF's you
want to load.
-- 
UUCP:		{rutgers|ames|uunet}!mimsy!wb3ffv!fallst!tkevans
INTERNET:	tkevans%fallst@wb3ffv.ampr.org
Tim Evans	2201 Brookhaven Ct, Fallston, MD 21047
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: herrera@athena.mit.edu (Ramon F Herrera)
Subject: The 'top' utility on AIX?
Keywords: top AIX
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 23:10:33 GMT

Is there a version of 'top' (the utility similar to 'ps')
that runs on AIX??

thanks,

-Ramon Herrera