HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kim@guppy.uucp (Isaac Kim)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
Subject: Re: They're all 2's.
Date: 25 Dec 92 04:36:26 GMT
Organization: UC San Diego
NNTP-Posting-Host: guppy.ucsd.edu

In article <1220052@hpopd.pwd.hp.com> jeffr@hpopd.pwd.hp.com (Jeff Retallic) writes:
>Here's a conundrum that's been troubling me for some weeks now - but I am
>easily troubled.
>
>A while ago a friend and I were hitting balls down at the local practice area.
>My practice balls are marked with a lower-case 'j'; Ian's are marked with a
>triangle with a dot inside.  After we had hit a few balls, two other guys
>arrived and started hitting balls right next to us and in the same direction.
>Concerned that our balls might take some sorting out I asked one of these 
>chaps if their balls were marked.
>"No" he said "but they are all 2's".
>
>Therein lies my problem.  Why would they only practice with 2's?  Did they 
>perhaps only ever buy 2's?  Is the number on the ball more relevant than the
>make and type?  Were 2's unlucky so that they only used them for practice?
>Perhaps they could get a special deal on 2's?  I'd be interested to hear any
>theories as to why this might be.
>
>Thank you for your time,
>
>jeff r

Jeff,

I really don't have answer to your question, except that people
are very superstitious when it come to golf.  Maybe he only plays
2's so thats all he has to practice with.  I personally only
play even numbered balls.  You should see the looks I get when
I am switching the sleeves of a box of balls so I only buy
the 2's and 4's.  The number on the ball has no relevance except to 
identify it from another ball of the same make and type.

You mentioned you were down at the local practice area.  I guess
we call these "shag-your-own" driving ranges.  I heard that there
are very few driving ranges in Great Britian where you buy the
balls, bash them, and then leave.  Is this true?

I am considering a Post-doc in England, and the availability of
pay-and-bash driving ranges might be a factor (although the 
thought of being so close to all of those great courses in 
Scotland might make up for the lack of driving ranges).

Thanks,

Isaac (kim@bull.ucsd.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
From: ohoda@cs.ulowell.edu (Omar Hoda)
Subject: I'm going down to Charlotte NC, on Monday should I take my clubs... 
Originator: ohoda@bigmax.ulowell.edu
Organization: U. Mass. at Lowell
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 01:51:18 GMT



Hi,
	I'm headed to North Carolina on Monday... would anyone know if it is 
worth lugging my clubs down there.  Whats the weather there like right now-- to
me anything over 50 degrees is golfing weather!!!  Ra ra ra...
i
	Thanks.

Omar.. 
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ohoda@cs.ulowell.edu       	"A man is wise in only what he knows well"
Computer Science Dept.      	 		       	-- Socrates
UMass-Lowell                    
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
From: bcherkas@netcom.com (Brian Cherkas)
Subject: Comments about Ping Zings?
Summary: Comments about Ping Zings
Keywords: golf, ping
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 05:55:58 GMT

Anyone have anything good to say about Pinz Zings? I have two
broken old irons and I plan on eventually replacing all of
them. I can get them at discount for $60 a piece. Are they
worth it?

-- 
Brian Cherkas     * *    bcherkas@netcom.com
                   I   
AOL/BrianC22      \_/    compuserve/71251,3253
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
From: randy@clark.dgim.doc.ca (Randy Crawford)
Subject: Wood Shaft Drivers
Organization: Communications Canada
Distribution: all
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 21:25:19 GMT

My father has a couple of golf clubs made completely out of wood.
Would these clubs have any type of antique value to them?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.golf
From: IORR@ESOC.BITNET
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
Subject: Re: Brittish Lions
Date: 28 Dec 92 15:19:04 GMT
 <BzLqyI.8yp@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com> <92357.052957MJENNER@ESOC.BITNET>
Organisation: European Space Operation Centre (E.S.O.C)


 The reason Andy Robinson has not been mentioned Marc is because he is
not worth it :-). Much too small against Southern hemisphere backrows.
   Rgds,
   Ivor.
From: cmb@epcc.ed.ac.uk (C.M.Brough)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
Subject: Scotland A squad (vs. Ireland A) and Scotland trial teams
Date: 22 Dec 92 12:13:25 GMT
Followup-To: rec.sport.rugby
Organization: Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre

Scotland A	(vs. Ireland A, Landsdowne Road, Dublin, 28/12/92)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
K Logan		(Stirling Co)
A Stanger	(Hawick)
G Townsend	(Gala)
I Jardine	(Stirling Co)
M Appleson	(London Scottish)
G Shiel		(Melrose)
A Nicol	(capt)	(Dundee HSFP)
A Watt		(GHK)
K Milne		(Heriots)
P Wright	(Boroughmuir)
A Reed		(Bath)
S Munro		(GHK)
D McIntosh	(Pontypridd)
C Hogg		(Melrose)
I Morrison	(London Scottish)

Replacements:
-------------
J Kerr, D Wylie, D Millard, A MacDonald, G Wilson, M Scott


Scottish Trial	(Blues are the 'senior' team; Murrayfield, Sat. Jan 2nd, 1992)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	Blues			Reds
	------			------
15	G Hastings (capt)	K Logan
14	D Stark			A Stanger
13	G Townsend		I Jardine
12	S Hastings		D Wyllie
11	M Appleson		J Kerr
10	C Chalmers		G Shiel
9	G Armstrong		A Nicol (capt)
1	A Sharp			A Watt
2	K Milne			I Corcoran
3	P Wright		P Burnell
4	A Reed			C Gray
5	D Cronin		G Weir
6	D McIntosh		D Turnbull
8	C Hogg			S Reid
7	I Morrison		I Smith

Replacements:
-------------
Backs:	D Barrett, D Caskie, A Donaldson, F Harrold, D Millard,
	M Moncrieff 
Forwards: S Aitken, J Amos, G Isaac, A MacDonald, D McIvor, S Munro,
	M Scott, G Wilson

__________________________________________________________________________
Colin Brough    cmb@epcc.ed.ac.uk      Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
Subject: Re: Richard Loe
From: graham@otago.ac.nz
Date: 23 Dec 92 11:45:40 +1300
Organization: University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

In article <1992Dec20.223203.7921@cs.su.oz.au>, allanc@cs.su.oz.au (Restless Wanderer) writes:
> 
> Do you believe that Loe will represent again after this incident.?
> Or do any NZer's think he should represent again.?

I am convinced that the majority of NZers do not want Loe on the field 
again.  He should have been got rid of when he appeared to deliberately
smash Carozza's snitch.  That whitewash did not go down too well with
the general public (at least the ones I talked with).  The guy has always
appeared as a thug to me and quite frankly we can do without his kind
in the sport, as good as he may be at times!

Graham
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
From: grahamc@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com (Graham Cutting)
Subject: Re: Brittish Lions
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 14:13:54 GMT
Organization: HP, Berkshire, England
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

Marc (MJENNER@ESOC.BITNET) wrote:
>Why has no one mentioned Andy Robinson who has the mobility of Back and seems
>to be a little stronger in the upper body, although not as good a tackler as
>Winterbottom.
>
>   Could someone post a report of the divisional clash between Midlands and
> South West, this game could have answered a lot of questions for the future of
>English back-row .
>                    Richards v Clarke
>                    Back     v Robinson
>                    ????     v Hall

Shillingford (Moseley) was probably the missing name here.  He certainly
played one for Midlands.  The SW drew with the Midlands and that is about 
all I can tell you, I taped Sundays highlights and haven't watched them
yet - my interest dropped.

The whole question of the Divisional Championship as a means of selecting the
England team is a bit of a joke, especially for the back-row.  Both Teague
and Ojomoh did not get selected for their division and Winterbottom decided
to go training instead.  And also consider that the England squad was 
announced before the last division game, of which there are only three.  
There are no real national ties to any of the divisoin sides either, well 
none that I have noticed, so it gets little media space.  

I would prefer to see a few trials games to judge the players on.  

As for Andy Robinson I think he is also up there as an international standard
player.  Ranking the top opensides may be tricky but Winterbottom would be
at the top.  Incidentally, Winterbottom plans to retire after this season,
probably will depend on whether he makes the Lions, which I think he should.

My top England opensiders would be:  Winterbottom, Robinson, Back.  Although
I would easily put a few others up there.  On the blind I would have: Teague,
Hall, Rodber, Ojomoh and then there is also Russell.  The No.8 slot is there
for Clarke and he appears to be improving every game, Rodber can also fill
that gap if nec.

I think what is unfortunate for Back is that he has played for England B 
and was voted man of the series in NZ.  He then gets thrown to one side
when the 5N looms.  It does indicate a bit about Geoff Cooke's plans as
he wants ball retainers rather than ball winners.  He seems to be putting 
the emphasis on keeping the ball once it has been won rather than electric
pace to be first there.  I think he should have considered Back/Robinson
more so as the backrow is looking very stereotyped, especially once
Winterbottom has gone.

>
> Regards
>          Marc.

Cheers,
Graham

--
Graham Cutting
grahamc@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com
Hewlett-Packard, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 1HN, England
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
From: spingo@panix.com (James Barnett)
Subject: REQUEST: any NYC/Westchester clubs?
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 06:20:23 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC

Hiya, all.
A friend of mine just moved here from Dublin and wants to get started 
playing with a local rugby club.

Does anyone know of a club/league in Lower Westchester County or New York
City? I'd greatly appreciate any info, even for, say, a nat'l amateur 
association that'd have info.

Please send email 'cause I'm not in this newsgroup very often. Please.

thanks!

James Barnett
spingo@panix.com

-- 
James Barnett
spingo@panix.com
From: stark@saturn.sdsu.edu (Brian D. Stark)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
Subject: Re: Scotland A squad (vs. Ireland A) and Scotland trial teams
Date: 24 Dec 1992 16:48:06 GMT
Organization: San Diego State University, Math Dept.
NNTP-Posting-Host: saturn.sdsu.edu

In article <BzntyE.2r1@dcs.ed.ac.uk> cmb@epcc.ed.ac.uk (C.M.Brough) writes:
>Scotland A	(vs. Ireland A, Landsdowne Road, Dublin, 28/12/92)
>
>Scottish Trial	(Blues are the 'senior' team; Murrayfield, Sat. Jan 2nd, 1992)
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would really like to see these matches, unfortunately I won't be able to
where I live.  I would gladly pay someone to tape the matches and send me a
copy.

Thanks,

brian

stark@saturn.sdsu.edu
3984 Lamont St. #2
San Diego, CA 92109
From: rose@galoob.cs.utk.edu (John Rose)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
Subject: general rugby info
Date: 30 Dec 1992 09:07:57 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - Department of Computer Science
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: rose@galoob.cs.utk.edu (John Rose)
NNTP-Posting-Host: galoob.cs.utk.edu
Keywords: rulebook, rugby magazine

seems like a couple folks posted at one time asking this. anyway, here
is some info i thought some people might want:

to get a usa rugby rule book call or write...

U.S.A.R.F.U.  National Office
3595 E. Fountain Blvd.
Colorado Springs, Colorado  80910

phone: 719-637-1022


to subscribe to RUGBY magazine...

The Rugby Press Ltd.
2350 Broadway
New York, NY  10024

phone: 212-787-1160



Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
From: grahamc@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com (Graham Cutting)
Subject: Re: Brittish Lions
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 09:13:29 GMT
Organization: HP, Berkshire, England
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

Restless Wanderer (allanc@cs.su.oz.au) wrote:
>In article <BzEzwL.I7D@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com> grahamc@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com (Graham Cutting) writes:
>>
>>In light of Geoff Cooke's selection criteria; How tall is Webster?
>
>Who'd have thought that the Lions selectors would do the Australian
>kickback.?
>Jeff Miller,one of Australia's unsung heros ,was dropped from the National]
>side(some years ago) because Dwyer and the selectors said he was too small.
>Miller is 5'9" and was like a blue cattle dog around the paddock.
>But Dywer reckoned that he was too small to be effective in Lineout work.
>He also claimed that being so small,the Blacks would chew him up and
>spit him out.(They never did,although they tried.)

I have been wondering what happened to Miller.  I almost (honest guv!) posted
about him during the Aussie tour.  Wilson does have his plus points but there
were times (a lot of them) when a Miller style player would have been a help,
especially supporting the likes of Little and Horan in the break and tackle.

>
>5'10" Too small,christ give me  break.If he can pass the height bar at
>Disneyworld for Space Mountain,then he should go(assuming he is good enough).
>More power to 'little' people.......
>allanc

I couldn't agree with you more.  The problem for Back is that everytime he
gets knocked back the likes of Cooke will wonder whether Winterbottom would
have been.  The SA No.8's try against England B couldn't have helped; where
he knocked Back back to score.  I can't see Ojomoh getting around the park
as effectively as Back.

--
Graham Cutting
grahamc@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com
Hewlett-Packard, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 1HN, England
Organisation: European Space Operation Centre (E.S.O.C)
Date: Tuesday, 22 Dec 1992 05:29:57 CET
From: <MJENNER@ESOC.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
Subject: Re: Brittish Lions
 <BzLqyI.8yp@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com>

Why has no one mentioned Andy Robinson who has the mobility of Back and seems
to be a little stronger in the upper body, although not as good a tackler as
Winterbottom.

   Could someone post a report of the divisional clash between Midlands and
 South West, this game could have answered a lot of questions for the future of
English back-row .
                    Richards v Clarke
                    Back     v Robinson
                    ????     v Hall



 Regards
          Marc.
From: dhr@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Dave Robinson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
Subject: Re: Christmas Quiz (DIY) :-)
Date: 22 Dec 92 13:37:08 GMT
Organization: ICL Bracknell, UK

In article <BzMF69.Krr@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com> grahamc@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com (Graham Cutting) writes:
>Here is a little light-hearted (or maybe headed) attempt at a Christmas
>Quiz drawing on events from the world of rugby.  It is a Do-It-Yourself
>quiz (with no prizes!) so please feel free to add your own questions...
>
>Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.
>
>Graham
>
>P.S. All attempts are made to ensure questions are accurate - but that is
>     no guarantee! 
>_____________________________________________________________________________
>
>			r.s.r Christmas Quiz
>
>--- Rob Andrew has just received quick ruck ball in an attacking position on 
>the opposition's 22m.  His backs are formed on his right with a 2 man overlap,
>the backrow are on his left with a 1 man overlap.  The ball is dry and the
>pitch is firm.  What does he do next?
>
>a) drop kick
>b) chip kick
>c) grubber kick
>d) garryowen
>e) kick for touch

Poor old Rob Andrew, getting the p**s taken out of him again !
Perhaps, after the recent couple of divisional matches, you should have
added another answer ....

f) He ignores both the backs and forwards, and scores himself !

>
>	[other (more) amusing questions deleted]

Perhaps I should add my own question.

----- England win the next 3 Grand Slams with ease, and end the run by
winning the '95 World Cup, defeating Australia and New Zealand on the way.
Now who is the best team in the world ?

a)	Australia
b)	New Zealand
c)	Australia
d)	Wales		( even though they failed to qualify :-) )
e)	New Zealand
f)	Australia

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all - don't flame *too* seriously,
it's all done in the best possible tast !

Dave
-- 
Dave Robinson, ICL-BRA01, Lovelace Rd, Bracknell, Berks.  RG12 4TZ.  UK
Tel: (+44) 344 424842 x3517	ITN: 7263 3517  Fax: (+44) 344 487832
EMAIL:		dhr@dsbc.icl.co.uk or dhr@oasis.icl.co.uk
ICLMAIL:	d.h.robinson@uk01
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rugby
From: grahamc@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com (Graham Cutting)
Subject: Christmas Quiz (DIY) :-)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:56:31 GMT
Organization: HP, Berkshire, England
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.4 PL6]

Here is a little light-hearted (or maybe headed) attempt at a Christmas
Quiz drawing on events from the world of rugby.  It is a Do-It-Yourself
quiz (with no prizes!) so please feel free to add your own questions...

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

Graham

P.S. All attempts are made to ensure questions are accurate - but that is
     no guarantee! 
_____________________________________________________________________________

			r.s.r Christmas Quiz

--- Rob Andrew has just received quick ruck ball in an attacking position on 
the opposition's 22m.  His backs are formed on his right with a 2 man overlap,
the backrow are on his left with a 1 man overlap.  The ball is dry and the
pitch is firm.  What does he do next?

a) drop kick
b) chip kick
c) grubber kick
d) garryowen
e) kick for touch

--- Who has *NOT* played in the New Zealand backrow against Ireland & Australia 
this year?

a) Brooke, Z
b) Jones, M
c) Pene
d) Joseph
e) Earl
f) Henderson
g) Brewer
h) Fox

--- During the World Cup `91; who made this comment:
"I think, at the end of the day, when this tournament's over, people
are going to remember who won not about who scored what."

a) Rob Andrew
b) Gary Whetton 
c) Nick Farr-Jones
d) Serge Blanco

--- During the World Cup `91; who made this comment:
"It was a fraternal gesture"

a) David Kirk
b) David Bishop
c) Nigel Heslop
d) Daniel Dubrocca 

--- How high can Hattingh (SA) reach in a lineout jump?  
(Hills and Andrew (standing) can reach 7.5ft.  Hattingh can reach 9ft.  
The distance from Hattingh's feet and the waistband on his shorts is 3.5ft.)

a) 9ft
b) 10ft
c) 13ft

--
Graham Cutting
grahamc@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com
Hewlett-Packard, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 1HN, England
From: an1060@anon.penet.fi
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: 2 Questions...
Date: 30 Dec 92 21:14:51 GMT
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: rec.sport.tennis

X-Anon-To: rec.sport.tennis


Hello All,

I hope these are not FAQ's!!!

1. A friend of mine told me that the tennis balls used for tournament play
   are harder than the ones that we buy in the stores.  Is this true??
   If so, then why??  since they replace them with new ones during each match...
   And if true, where can we purchase such balls??

2. Perhaps a person knowledgable about physics can explain why it is that
   as tennis racquet string tension decreases, the power transmitted to the
   ball increases!!!!   This seems contrary to common sense, but most/all new
   tennis racquets have this printed on them!!!  A physics Ph.D. friend of
   mine explained the reason as follows:  the looser is the tension, the
   longer the ball stays on the racquet strings...and since it is the impulse
   (force)x[delta(t)] that determines the speed off the racquet, the delta(t)
   increases, thus increasing the impulse.  
   Well, this makes sense from a physics standpoint, but still defies my (and
   many others) common sense!!!!   Imagine a very, very loosely strung racquet..
   it would be almost useless for play....whereas a very tightly strung racquet
   would (seemingly) be far more useful and impart more power to the shots!!!
   Where is the flaw in the "common sense" appoach???   Where is the "common
   sense" to the physics explanation????

Many thanks in advance...

Abe

mantell@ams.sunysb.edu

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
From: goldman@acacia.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Roy Goldman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Krickstein's status
Date: 2 Jan 1993 18:05:41 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: acacia.cs.berkeley.edu

Does anyone know about the status of Aaron Krickstein?

I recall that he broke his foot in the semifinals of the Volvo Los
Angeles in August 1992.  At that time, he said that he planned to
return to tennis (he was only 25 years old at the time of this latest
injury) and would be out only three months. 

Any information anyone has would be appreciated.  Has he recovered?
Will he play the Australian Open?  If not, when is he due to return?
Hopefully, he isn't retiring.  "Krick's" hard working character and
calm court presence are sorely missed on the ATP tour.
From: cs30@prism.gatech.EDU (Christopher Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: News: Year-End Doubles Rankings
Keywords: News, Rankings, Doubles
Date: 29 Dec 92 17:11:36 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


[Source: Tennis Week / ATP / WTA]

Year-ending doubles rankings:


  Men                              Women
  ------------------------------------------------------------
  1.  Mark Woodforde               1.  Helena Sukova
  2.  Todd Woodbridge              2.  Natalia Zvereva
  3.  Jim Grabb                    3.  A. Sanchez Vicario
  4.  Richey Reneberg              4.  Jana Novotna
  5.  Kelly Jones                  5.  L. (Savchenko) Neiland
  6.  Rick Leach                   6.  Gigi Fernandez
  7.  Patrick McEnroe              7.  Pam Shriver
  8.  Jakob Hlasek                 8.  Conchita Martinez
  9.  John McEnroe                 9.  Martina Navratilova
  10. Anders Jarryd                10. Z. Garrison-Jackson
  11. John Fitgerald               11. Mary Joe Fernandez
  12. Marc Rosset                  12. Stephanie Rehe
  13. Patrick Galbraith            13. Rennae Stubbs
  14. Mark Kratzmann               14. Lori McNeil
  15. David MacPherson             15. Kathy Rinaldi
  16. Michael Stich                16. Patty Fendick
  17. Cyril Suk                    17. Jill Hetherington
  18. Tom Nijssen                  18. Katrina Adams
  19. Wally Masur                  19. Manon Bollegraf
  20. Danie Visser                 20. Rachel McQuillan
  ------------------------------------------------------------


..Chris


-- 
Christopher Smith                        csmith@cc.gatech.edu
College of Computing, Georgia Tech       404/853-0937
From: cs30@prism.gatech.EDU (Christopher Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Pro-tennis Not Well-Served in the U.S.
Date: 2 Jan 93 16:09:58 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology



> Also, while there are three to four golf magazines on display at
> bookstores, Tennis magazine is the only entry for pro-tennis.  

I am aware of three Tennis periodicals in the US: Tennis Week, Tennis,
and Racquet (listed in descending order of my perceived worth of each
periodical).

Tennis Week comes out twice a month in most months and is generally
not available except through subscription.  It includes the most
comprehensive coverage of recent tournaments mixed with features
mainly about the pros and the pro tour.  The cost is $40.00 per
year (in the past, USTA membership in a few select areas included
a Tennis Week subscription, but I don't know if this is true any
longer).

Tennis, a monthly periodical, is the most widely available publication
and carries some tournament info but with more emphasis on special
features and tips and a bit on travel and equipment.  Subscription
rate is $13.97 per year.

Racquet is a bi-monthly magazine offering features on the pros,
marketing, tennis attire, travel & resorts, and so forth (they even
have a Wine and Spirits Editor and a Grooming Editor!).  Cost is
$18.00 per year, I believe, but it may actually be higher than that.
This magazine is largely fluff, in my opinion.

..Chris

-- 
Christopher Smith                        csmith@cc.gatech.edu
College of Computing, Georgia Tech       404/853-0937
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis