HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Jeffrey Luszcz <jrl2@cornell.edu>
Subject: Qbus SMD drive question, Kennedy 5300 and  Emulex SC02/A
X-Xxdate: Sun, 13 Dec 92 21: 51:37 GMT
Nntp-Posting-User: jrl2@cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell University
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d7
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 22:48:08 GMT


  Well, after deciding to upgrade my system
from a 34a to a 23+, I've run into a snag.
I've been able to get my rl02 drives working
on my 23+ and booting rsx-11 ver 4.0 and
everything else but when I moved my Kennedy 5300
drive over I ran into problem.
  I'm using a SC02/A rp02/03 compatible controller
from Emulex. (circa 1981)
  I have the Emulex board looking for a drive which 
has 700 physical cylenders, 5 tracks and 35 Sectors.
I believe I have the Kennedy drive set up correctly.
 I hardware format the drive using the Emulex controller's
on board formatter,
   @776714/1
   @776714/14003
  
  to format drive 0

  I then boot rsx-11 off the rl02. I have rp02s in my sysgen
and the kennedy worked off this sysgen on the 34a. When I try
to INIT 
  > ini dp0:
 
 I get the message, searching for bad block file
or sofething to the equivilent. I'm going to try to run
BAD tonite after work when I get it from a friend, but
has anyone had expeiriance with this setup before?
  Thanks
   -Jeff 
cc2x@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
From: mbg@world.std.com (Megan B Gentry)
Subject: Re: No luck with 11/34 yet.
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 05:22:43 GMT


I'll help all I can, don't hesitate to send me email.  I'm not sure
if I can help with manuals as what I have is a library built up from
years of working at dec on rt-11.

What's the problem you're having?

				(Maybe we should continue in email)
					Megan

Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
From: chapman@cs.cornell.edu (Richard Chapman)
Subject: Re: Qbus SMD drive question, Kennedy 5300 and Emulex SC02/A
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:34:16 GMT

Jeffrey Luszcz <jrl2@cornell.edu> writes:


>  Well, after deciding to upgrade my system
>from a 34a to a 23+, I've run into a snag.
>I've been able to get my rl02 drives working
>on my 23+ and booting rsx-11 ver 4.0 and
>everything else but when I moved my Kennedy 5300
>drive over I ran into problem.
>  I'm using a SC02/A rp02/03 compatible controller
>from Emulex. (circa 1981)
>  I have the Emulex board looking for a drive which 
>has 700 physical cylenders, 5 tracks and 35 Sectors.
>I believe I have the Kennedy drive set up correctly.
> I hardware format the drive using the Emulex controller's
>on board formatter,
>   @776714/1
>   @776714/14003
>  
>  to format drive 0

I am trying to do something similar, and also request help (Jeff and I
have talked, and between the two of us we are still at a bit of a loss).
I am trying to connect a Kennedy 5300 drive to an 11/34a using a Dilog DU202
board, and am also having little luck formatting it. The manual for the
DU202 also seems to indicate that storing 4003 into 776714 initiates some
sort of onboard formatter, but also that some table of header information
is expected from memory. Apparently Dilog supplied software to do this
when you bought the board new, but that is long gone. Has anyone ever
done this? 

Richard Chapman
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
Subject: Re: Qbus SMD drive question, Kennedy 5300 and Emulex SC02/A
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@intercon.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 21:23:14 -0500
Organization: The Internet
Return-Path: <pat+@transarc.com>
X-Mailer: InterCon TCP/Connect II 1.1fc3

>> From: Megan B Gentry <mbg@world.std.com>
>
> I checked the sources and they do twiddle the hardware directly.  The RP
> device you're using may not emulate an RP02/03 exactly.
>
> What version of RT are you using?

I am fairly sure that the SC02 emulates RK06/RK07 drives, not RP02.
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 13:49:20 EST
From: <JXR126@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
Subject: Re: 11/34 confusion.
 <92347.051420JXR126@psuvm.psu.edu> <Bz5MFv.D5t@world.std.com>

Ok... Maybe it was rl01,rl02, and ts05 (tape).  I can't remember exactly
because the machines are at home.. I definately have the rk06, though.

                  Jake Ritorto             (Who, by the way, is going to )
       USmail :   186 Sportsman rd         (lose his net access at the   )
                  Darlington, Pa.          (end of the semester...       )
                           16115
   Thanks to everyone for the help (I might not ever be here again..).
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
From: mbg@world.std.com (Megan B Gentry)
Subject: Re: Qbus SMD drive question, Kennedy 5300 and Emulex SC02/A
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:44:49 GMT

chapman@cs.cornell.edu (Richard Chapman) writes:

>Johnny Billquist <bqt@bern.docs.uu.se> writes:

>least move the heads over all the sectors) Under RT-11, FORMAT returns
>in about 1 second and says that it has finished successfully. But then
>RT-11 INIT indicates "Directory read error".

I'm not familiar with the specific device, but if it isn't a piece
of Digital hardware, there is a possibility that FORMAT can't deal
with it.  I'm going to look at the FORMAT sources and see what it
does, but I suspect that it tries to diddle the hardware directly,
and unless the non-dec hardware simulated an RP EXACTLY, this may
not work, but appear to, or vice versa.

					Megan
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
From: mbg@world.std.com (Megan B Gentry)
Subject: Re: Qbus SMD drive question, Kennedy 5300 and Emulex SC02/A
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 04:35:03 GMT

>I'm not familiar with the specific device, but if it isn't a piece
>of Digital hardware, there is a possibility that FORMAT can't deal
>with it.  I'm going to look at the FORMAT sources and see what it
>does, but I suspect that it tries to diddle the hardware directly,
>and unless the non-dec hardware simulated an RP EXACTLY, this may
>not work, but appear to, or vice versa.

I checked the sources and they do twiddle the hardware directly.  The
RP device you're using may not emulate an RP02/03 exactly.

What version of RT are you using?

					Megan
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
Subject: Emulex SC01 or SC11
From: Johnny Billquist <bqt@bern.docs.uu.se>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 20:08:35 MET
Reply-To: bqt@minsk.docs.uu.se
Organization: The Internet
Return-Path: <pat+@transarc.com>

Anybody got any information on this controller.
What I know is that it is a Unibus controller. It appears to
be an SMD controller. What it emulates or what discs that
can be connected I have no idea. Any help would be appreciated.

Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
CS student at Uppsala University  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt@minsk.docs.uu.se       ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
From: chapman@cs.cornell.edu (Richard Chapman)
Subject: Re: Qbus SMD drive question, Kennedy 5300 and Emulex SC02/A
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 16:09:55 GMT

Johnny Billquist <bqt@bern.docs.uu.se> writes:

>>Jeffrey Luszcz <jrl2@cornell.edu> writes:
>>
>>
>>>  Well, after deciding to upgrade my system
>>>from a 34a to a 23+, I've run into a snag.
>>>  I'm using a SC02/A rp02/03 compatible controller
>>>from Emulex. (circa 1981)
>>>  I have the Emulex board looking for a drive which
>>>has 700 physical cylenders, 5 tracks and 35 Sectors.
>>>I believe I have the Kennedy drive set up correctly.

>>I am trying to do something similar, and also request help (Jeff and I
>>have talked, and between the two of us we are still at a bit of a loss).
>>I am trying to connect a Kennedy 5300 drive to an 11/34a using a Dilog DU202
>>board, and am also having little luck formatting it. 

>What's wrong with FMT, provided that you are running RSX?

>Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus

The way both these cards work is to organize the Kennedy 5300 drive into
several logical RP02's. I think you have to do something to the disk
to set that up before you go off and try to "format" each RP02 using
a DEC OS. As I said, Dilog provided some software (are they still in
business? If so where, or what is the phone #?) that did the low-level
formatting. It returned messages like "Organizing Kennedy 5300 into
6 RP02 drives" according to the manual.  

Under RSX-11M, FMT just hangs after it says "Start formatting." The
heads swing inward, and then nothing happens (on both Jeff's Kennedy
drive and mine. We let it go about 30 minutes just in case it was so
slow we couldn't see the heads move, but we are now convinced that it
is hanging). There is a footnote in the RSX-11M FMT manual saying that
stand-alone FMT uses vector 320 for DP: drives -- why? Everything else
I read, including the manual for the Dilog card, says that RP02 
controllers use vector 254. 

If I run BAD DP0:/LIST, it returns every LBN as bad (but it does at
least move the heads over all the sectors) Under RT-11, FORMAT returns
in about 1 second and says that it has finished successfully. But then
RT-11 INIT indicates "Directory read error".

Any ideas?
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
Subject: Re: Qbus SMD drive question, Kennedy 5300 and Emulex SC02/A
From: Johnny Billquist <bqt@bern.docs.uu.se>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 9:57:02 MET
Reply-To: bqt@minsk.docs.uu.se
Organization: The Internet
Return-Path: <pat+@transarc.com>
CC: info-pdp11@transarc.com

>Jeffrey Luszcz <jrl2@cornell.edu> writes:
>
>
>>  Well, after deciding to upgrade my system
>>from a 34a to a 23+, I've run into a snag.
>>I've been able to get my rl02 drives working
>>on my 23+ and booting rsx-11 ver 4.0 and
>>everything else but when I moved my Kennedy 5300
>>drive over I ran into problem.
>>  I'm using a SC02/A rp02/03 compatible controller
>>from Emulex. (circa 1981)
>>  I have the Emulex board looking for a drive which
>>has 700 physical cylenders, 5 tracks and 35 Sectors.
>>I believe I have the Kennedy drive set up correctly.
>> I hardware format the drive using the Emulex controller's
>>on board formatter,
>>   @776714/1
>>   @776714/14003
>>
>>  to format drive 0
>
>I am trying to do something similar, and also request help (Jeff and I
>have talked, and between the two of us we are still at a bit of a loss).
>I am trying to connect a Kennedy 5300 drive to an 11/34a using a Dilog DU202
>board, and am also having little luck formatting it. The manual for the
>DU202 also seems to indicate that storing 4003 into 776714 initiates some
>sort of onboard formatter, but also that some table of header information
>is expected from memory. Apparently Dilog supplied software to do this
>when you bought the board new, but that is long gone. Has anyone ever
>done this?

What's wrong with FMT, provided that you are running RSX?

Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
CS student at Uppsala University  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt@minsk.docs.uu.se       ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
From: Jeffrey Luszcz <jrl2@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: Qbus SMD drive question, Kennedy 5300 and Emulex SC02/A
X-Xxdate: Fri, 18 Dec 92 20: 17:50 GMT
Nntp-Posting-User: jrl2@cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell University
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d7
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 20:14:23 GMT


Megan B Gentry, mbg@world.std.com writes:
>I checked the sources and they do twiddle the hardware directly.  The
>RP device you're using may not emulate an RP02/03 exactly.
>
>What version of RT are you using?
>
>					Megan
>

  I figured out what the problem was, a non-functioning dip-switch.
Even though the board was set correctly, it didn't think it was.
So I went through and switched all the switches back and forth
and then reset it up correctly. I put it in and was able to get the
onboard formatter to work. Yeehh!
  Megan is right, the FMT command will not work on this emulation.
but since the board has an onboard formatter, I'm set. Richard
Chapman who is also using a Kennedy  5300 is out of luck though.
After I got the board working he tried it with his 5300 and was
able to format it, but the Dilog DU202 he is using won't recognized
its format scheme. So he called Dilog, they want $250US for a 
formatting utility.  Woah. 
   I'm currently moving all my rl02 data over to my kennedy
on the 23+. A little nicer setup then the 34a. Doesn't scare the
cat as much, but the room is a lot colder without it running. 8-(
   -Jeff Luszcz
    cc2x@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
From: daveh@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
Subject: test...
Date: 16 Dec 92 17:37:11 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620

a test
-- 

David Hastings                      | "The technical axiom that nothing is
VAX Systems Programmer              |  impossible sinisterly conditions one to
Oxford University Computing Services|  the pitfall corollary that nothing is
daveh@vax.oxford.ac.uk              |  ridiculous"
From: system@chewi.che.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
Subject: Test - Do not reply
Date: 16 Dec 92 12:12:49 -0600
Organization: Univ of Wisc, Dept of Chem Engr

Test - Do not reply
From: rdeburca@vms.eurokom.ie
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
Subject: testing, please ignore
Date: 16 Dec 92 10:59:03 CET
Organization: EuroKom Conferencing Service

This is a test, please ignore

Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
From: daumier@vieux-maitres.fr
Subject: un autre test
Reply-To: daumier@vieux-maitres.fr
Organization: Les Amis Des Vieux Maitres
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:55:27 GMT


oui oui oui.

j.
Xref: sparky vmsnet.test:741 sfnet.test:637
From: savolainen_p@kulminator.salcom.fi (Pekka Savolainen, Salcom Finland)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test,sfnet.test
Subject: Re: trying new nntp
Date: 16 Dec 92 10:03:22 +0200
Reply-To: Pekka.Savolainen@Salcom.Fi
Organization: Salcom Finland, Jyvaskyla Finland

In article <1992Dec16.085955.118@kulminator.salcom.fi>, savolainen_p@kulminator.salcom.fi (Pekka Savolainen, Salcom Finland) writes:
> 
> Test, what else would you expect?
> 

Oh Yeah!


Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
From: jking@cam.compserv.utas.edu.au (Jason  King)
Subject: Re: test,please respond
Organization: University of Tasmania at Launceston
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 01:46:29 GMT

In article <1992Dec10.102932.333@edwards-tems.af.mil>, becker@edwards-tems.af.mil writes:
>
>I have been having problems transmitting out.  If you see this please
>reply!!!
>
>thanks!

I have seen it and I am replying!
-- 
Jason King					"I'm gonna do you slowly, mate!"
Email: J.King@nursing.utas.edu.au		Paul Keating.
University of Tasmania at Launceston		Prime Minister, Australia
From: beust@aurora.unice.fr (Cedric Beust)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
Subject: A test
Date: 15 Dec 1992 09:51:32 +0100
Organization: University of Nice - Sophia Antipolis, France
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: aurora.unice.fr


  Coming through grasp?
From: rdeburca@vms.eurokom.ie
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
Subject: testing
Date: 16 Dec 92 11:00:18 CET
Organization: EuroKom Conferencing Service

Second attempt.

Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
From: ttt@eos.ncsu.edu ()
Subject: ttt
Reply-To: ttt@eos.ncsu.edu ()
Organization: Artificial Intelligence Systems
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:53:46 GMT
From: mondays@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (I Give Up!!!!)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
Subject: test
Date: 19 Dec 92 18:04:52 GMT
Organization: Malice


test
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
From: dspencer@chsra2.chsra.wisc.edu
Subject: test
Reply-To: spencer@macc.wisc.edu
Organization: CHSRA/UW-MADISON, MADISON, WI
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 17:19:35 GMT

none
Organization: Rohm and Haas Company
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:59:39 EST
From: me <RSEQES@rohvm1.rohmhaas.com>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
Subject: Test

Test..
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
From: dspencer@chsra2.chsra.wisc.edu
Subject: testing
Reply-To: spencer@macc.wisc.edu
Organization: CHSRA/UW-MADISON, MADISON, WI
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 17:23:31 GMT

none
-----------------------------------------------
Dan Spencer         spencer@vms.macc.wisc.edu
Center for Health Systems Research and Analysis
UW-Madison
Xref: sparky vmsnet.test:740 sfnet.test:636
From: savolainen_p@kulminator.salcom.fi (Pekka Savolainen, Salcom Finland)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test,sfnet.test
Subject: trying new nntp
Date: 16 Dec 92 08:59:55 +0200
Reply-To: Pekka.Savolainen@Salcom.Fi
Organization: Salcom Finland, Jyvaskyla Finland


Test, what else would you expect?

-- 
/*
 Pekka Savolainen, Salcom Finland Oy,Box 37, SF-40321, Jyvaskyla, Finland
 Voicenet: +358-41-685333, Faxnet: +358-41-677944, Mobilenet: +358-49-642460
 Internet:  Pekka.Savolainen@salcom.fi, Homenet: p@budvar.salcom.fi
 X.25-net:  244324100014::Savolainen_P,  Fishingnet: NLA0: and /dev/null
*/
From: gleason@mwk.uucp
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
Subject: zeep
Date: 14 Dec 92 10:47:50 CST
Organization: M. W. Kellogg, Houston TX

zeep
zeep
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: The case problem
From: Per Hogstedt <hogstedt@plab.se>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:17:27 +0100
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

Matt spoke:
>Definitely a bug in MLF.  I forgot to update the FILESERV_CHECK_ACCESS routine
>(in module FILESERV.B32) to handle NOCASE-set mailing list users.  Thanks
>for finding it.

Since the case sensitivity problem has been a bit disturbing, I'd like to know
if there is any chance that this could be corrected before the next release
of MX (3.1d?). I don't know how extensive the update would be, but if there
is anyone out there planning to hack away, I am interested to know and if
possible help.

Cheers,
Per
-------
   Per Hogstedt               Internet:  hogstedt@plab.se
   Lindholmen Utveckling           or:   hogstedt@ae.chalmers.se
   P.O. Box 8714              Phone...:  +46 31 50 70 50
   S-402 75 Gothenburg        Fax.....:  +46 31 51 53 13
   Sweden                     MiniCall:  +46 74 35 68 49
From: "George D. Greenwade" <bed_gdg@SHSU.BITNET>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: Support for VRFY on SMTP_Server?
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1992 17:00:12 CST
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

This is yet another topic to bother Hunter with (which is not
extraordinarily high on my wish list, but...).

Are there any plans to support any form of user interface of commands for
the SMTP_Server in MX?  One of the feature supported by quite a few sites
is the VRFY command (as well as HELP), which can be reached via TELNETting
to port 25 and handling things interactively.  This is nice for verifying
things for list owners (among other things).  Presently, MX doesn't appear
to support anything along these lines.  Has anyone overcome this, have I
missed something somewhere, is this to be supported in future a release?

Regards,   George
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
George D. Greenwade, Ph.D.                            Bitnet:  BED_GDG@SHSU
Department of Economics and Business Analysis         THEnet: SHSU::BED_GDG
College of Business Administration                    Voice: (409) 294-1266
P. O. Box 2118                                        FAX:   (409) 294-3612
Sam Houston State University              Internet:        bed_gdg@SHSU.edu
Huntsville, TX 77341                      bed_gdg%SHSU.decnet@relay.the.net
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
From: madison@tgv.com (Matt Madison)
Subject: Re: File server case sensitivity
Reply-To: madison@tgv.com
Organization: The Foundation for Dinner Peas
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:04:46 GMT

In article <00965212.FAA366A0.9183@plasma.kth.se>, "Lars Blomberg, KTH Stockholm" <blomberg@plasma.kth.se> writes:
>We are currently running MX V3.1C with several mailing lists and file servers.
>Some of the file servers are associated with mailing lists to restrict access.
>It seems that for a user to be authorized to access such a file server the
>from-address must agree exactly (i.e., case-sensitively) with the address on
>the mailing list even if this has been specified with the /nocase option.
>Is this a bug in MX MLF or is our MX/mailing lists/file servers set up
>incorrectly?

Definitely a bug in MLF.  I forgot to update the FILESERV_CHECK_ACCESS routine
(in module FILESERV.B32) to handle NOCASE-set mailing list users.  Thanks
for finding it.

-Matt
--
Matthew Madison | madison@tgv.com    | +1 408 427 4366
TGV, Inc.       | 603 Mission Street | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA
From: Per Hogstedt <hogstedt@plab.se>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: RE: The case problem
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:22:55 +0100
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

Hunter said:
>I've fixed this for the next release of MX.  I'm shooting for a
>mid-to-late-January release of MX v3.1D.  It'll feature mostly little
>fixes to annoying problems like this one.  I'm also alpha-testing new
>[...]
>
>Here's my planned schedule.  My wife has got my Christmas break all
>planned out for me 8-), so I won't be able to work on MX much, if at
>all, over the next three weeks.  Around 1/14/93 (can you believe
>another year has gone by?), I hope to finish adding bug fixes, maybe a

Thanks for the info Hunter. Late-January is all right at least for me,
since my wife _also_ has planned the Christmas break (do we see a pattern
evolving here? :-))

/Per
-------
   Per Hogstedt               Internet:  hogstedt@plab.se
   Lindholmen Utveckling           or:   hogstedt@ae.chalmers.se
   P.O. Box 8714              Phone...:  +46 31 50 70 50
   S-402 75 Gothenburg        Fax.....:  +46 31 51 53 13
   Sweden                     MiniCall:  +46 74 35 68 49
-------
From: Per Hogstedt <hogstedt@plab.se>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: RE: The case problem
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:29:20 +0100
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

While we're at it; would it be violating some RFC if /NOCASE could be
enabled on a per-list basis vs on a per-user basis? That is, adding a /NOCASE
qualifier to the CREATE command?

/Per (one minute later)
From: moravec@NEWTON.PH1.UNI-KOELN.DE (Andreas Moravec)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: Re: MX delivery to black hole
Date: 18 Dec 1992 14:33:36 GMT
Organization: University of Cologne, I. Physik. Inst., Germany
Reply-To: moravec@NEWTON.PH1.UNI-KOELN.DE
NNTP-Posting-Host: newton.ph1.uni-koeln.de

In article <00965227.60447620.32361@jtk.queens.edu>,
 "Richard H. Ault" <ault@queens.edu> writes:
>We are running MX 3.1C, UCX 1.3, and VMS 5.5-2 on new MV3100's.  Accounts were

just a guess: don't you need a special version of UCX 1.3 (1.3A-number)
in combination with VMS 5.5-x ? (or UCX 2.0)
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       KOSMA = Koelner Observatorium fuer SubMillimeter-Astronomie
 Andreas Moravec               TEL      +49 (221) 470 3558
 I. Physikalisches Institut    FAX      +49 (221) 470 5162
 Universitaet zu Koeln         TELEX    888 2291 UNIK D
 Zuelpicher Str. 77            INTERNET Moravec@Ph1.Uni-Koeln.De
 5000 Koeln 41, Germany        X.400    S=Moravec;OU=Ph1;P=Uni-Koeln;A=DBP;C=DE