HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Weekend in Las Vegas!
Date: 5 Oct 92 17:40:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: sdcc12.39030
Distribution: na
Organization: what.. me.. organized?



Las Vegas is my kind of city. 

A place where the folks are serious
and passionate about their football.

Drove into Vegas on Saturday morning with my buddy [all night 
ride] at 7am, and went directly to the Stardust Sports Book. The
place was busy by then with folks awaiting the 9am FSU-Miami 
game. 

Put wagers on Houston [yes] -24 and UCLA [yuk] -6. Houston was damn
cheap at 24 pts. A team that gets creamed against real teams, and
creams patsies. They got creamed at Michgan 61-odd, and they went
and destroyed SW Louisiana by > 40. Jenkins is a handicapper's 
delight. Dont even ask me about UCLA. All that I say is that Arizona
is for real. 


ObObservations:

* The Pac10 is the best conf in all of college football; Wash.,
  Stanford, USC, California, UCLA and Arizona. Add to that WashSt 
  that can score a ton of points. 

* Great win for Stanford. ND didn't know what hit them. After their
  game vs. TexasA&M, I knew they could stop the run, but had my
  doubts about their passing game. I guess Walsh needed some time to
  get plan going. Holtz got outcoached [for once]. 

* Impressed very much by the USC defense. They played a good game
  under difficult conditions. 

* Washington needs better play from their Receivers/TightEnds.
  And they should start Brunell.

* Bobby Bowden, an otherwise imaginative and gutsy coach, always
  gets tight vs. Miami and ends up depending on his FG kicker 
  [could somebody please tell me why a great recruiting power
  house like Fsu CANNOT get a decent kicker??].

* I admit I hate Miami. I wish they lose every game, but I have
  to hand it to them; they are fundamentally a very sound football
  team. They almost never beat themselves [save the odd personal
  foul], any opponent *has* to earn it. They may not play well
  but in the end they find a way to win. 

* Good to see Wisconsin play well vs. OSU. They are on the verge 
  of stepping up to the next class, and will have arrived if they
  can beat Iowa in Iowa.

* Good bets on next week's lines;

	BYU -7.5 vs. FresnoSt
	[A step up in class for FresnoSt]
	Miami +1.5 @ PennSt
	[The line went from pick to +1.5, Miami is very quick]
	California +13 @ Washington
	[Considering Washington's sputtering off. and a big play
	Cal offense/defense, Cal may get a late cover for
	Gilbertson, the ex-UW man.]
	USC -11.5 vs. Oregon
	[USC wants to atone for last year's home opener loss. And
	they finally get to play a team that is down in class from
	the previous week. {SDSU-OU-UW}]




_______________________________________________________
| Prashanth                    |                      |
| U. of California @ San Diego | prash@raman.ucsd.edu |
#######################################################
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: swanson@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Bob Swanson)
Subject: Re: Mullet nonsense (was Grits nonsense)
Summary: Drug Free Mullet
Organization: Florida State University "Second Look" Department
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 01:34:17 GMT

swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:
>> 
>> No!  Smoke it.  (kids, don't try this at home!)
>
>Smoke it?  How do you roll the fish in the tiny papers?  Or, do you use a
>bong?    :-) -- just in case 

Like I said, don't try this at home unless you know what you're doing.  Bongs
are a bad idea, as the oils tend to collect in the wrong places, and makes the
smoked turkey taste really funny.
 
Vivid colors, though.

-- 
Bob Swanson			    Give me a lever long enough, and a place
swanson@loligo.cc.fsu.edu	    to stand, and I will break my lever.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: lauson@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Patrick W Lauson)
Subject: Re: Deja Vu all over again (OSU, Wisconson, putrid play calling)
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 92 22:25:09 GMT

In article <1992Oct4.012845.4519@desire.wright.edu> skip writes:
>
>	AHHHHHHHHHHHH!  It's Earl Bruce all over again, only without the same
>level of talent.
>
>	But we'll be back.  We'll be 10-2.  We'll lose to Michigan.  But not to
>anyone else.

If its Earl Bruce all over again, shouldn't we go 9-3????
Besides, we have to lose our bowl game....
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
| Pat Lawson                     :  Go Buckeyes!!!!!!            |
| lauson@en.ecn.purdue.edu       :    Scarlet and Gray Rules!!!! |
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: This Week in the SEC (Oct. 3)
Summary: MSU stomps Gators, Vols continue to roll
Date: 4 Oct 92 19:57:04 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Ramblin' Wrecks from Georgia Tech

Scores this weekend:

ALABAMA (5-0) thrashed SOUTH CAROLINA (0-5), 48-7

More incredible defense this week from the Crimson Tide, and against
the Lamecocks they were even able to generate some impressive
offensive numbers.  South Carolina was limited to 43 rushing yards.

GEORGIA (4-1) stomped ARKANSAS (1-4), 27-3

Danny Ford's offensive assistance seemed to do little for the
Razorbacks, and Garrison Hearst continued a brilliant season
for the Dawgs with 143 yards an just 19 carries.

AUBURN (4-1) beat VANDERBILT (2-2), 31-7

The return to the road returned the Commodores to old form, as they
fumbled on their very first play from scrimmage and continued to
make crucial errors for rest of the afternoon.  Auburn turned
in a solid rushing performance, including a 49-yard TD run by James
Bostick.

MISSISSIPPI STATE (3-1) smothered FLORIDA (1-2), 30-6

The Bulldogs took advantage of their first true home game against
Florida in 6 years with some dominating defense including 5 interceptions
of 2-time SEC player of the year Shane Matthews.  The Bulldogs suffered
a blow in the 2nd quarter, however, as QB Sleepy Robinson was lost for
the season due to an knee injury.

OLE MISS (3-2) beat KENTUCKY (3-2), 24-14

The Rebels jumped out an early lead in this one and hung on for
a much needed conference win.

TENNESSEE (5-0) shutout LSU (1-4), 20-0

The Bayou Bengals never seriously threatened in this one, spending
much of the evening backed up deep in their own territory.  


S E C   S t a n d i n g s
=================================================================
E a s t          Conf   Overall  | W e s t         Conf   Overall
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tennessee        3-0    5-0      | Alabama         3-0    5-0
Georgia          3-1    4-1      | Auburn          2-1    4-1
Kentucky         1-2    3-2      | Mississippi St. 1-1    3-1
Vanderbilt       1-2    2-2      | Ole Miss        2-2    3-2
Florida          1-2    1-2      | Arkansas        1-2    1-4
South Carolina   0-4    0-5      | LSU             1-2    1-4

-- 
Mark Mitchell           Georgia Tech            mm42@prism.gatech.edu
       "Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing 
         swords is no basis for a system of government!"
From: ds4@soc5.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami, Florida
Date: 29 Sep 92 16:16:56 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.191330.22375@u.washington.edu>, tannerg@milton.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner) writes:
|> 
|> >Miami found a way to win, while playing poorly.  Just like all great teams
|> >do that don't panic and play for a tie.   
|> 
|> I heard an even more pathetic attempt at justifying the closeness of this game.

Bobby Bowden of the Seminoles commented that the Arizona, Miami game just shows
how the Canes will do anything to win.....he his not only one of the best coaches
in college football, but his opinion is better qualified than your biased one. 
Plus this is from a guy that should know :)

|> One of Miami's announcers said, as Arizona was marching downfield in the final
|> moments, "You know, that 1-1-1 record of Arizona is deceiving.  Their loss came

Since when does a team march to a 51 yard field goal?

|> on a last second field goal, and their tie because they missed a late FG..." or
|> something like that.  He failed to mention that the tie was to OREGON STATE.
|> 
|> I guess Miami's unblemished record is deceiving, too, huh?
 
Well I guess we will never know about Washington since they do not play anyone of
note.

-ds4
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tshannon@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (Timothy J. Shannon)
Subject: Wilie Guy 6 game suspesion? (was Re: UNI Stomps on ISU)
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 19:25:52 GMT

From article <1992Sep28.153945.29411@news.iastate.edu>, by jbhuber@iastate.edu (Joseph B Huber):
> 
> By the way, what's the deal with Willie Guy; is he ever going to play a game
> for Hayden?  This guy must hold the NCAA record for time spent ineligible to
> play.
> 
	According to Bob Bowlsby (Iowa AD) willie is eligible to play 
academically  but he does not support the Iowa team that well.  But according
to the Cedar Rapids Gazette, Willie is still serving a 6 game suspesion.
Bowlsby and Fry deny it, but the article claims to have an unidentified souce!



-- 
___ ___ _   _    _       _             _
 |   |  | \/ |  (_  |_| |_| |\ | |\ | | | |\ | timothy-shannon@uiowa.edu 
 |  _|_ |    |   _) | | | | | \| | \| |_| | \| tshannon@CCAD.UIOWA.EDU
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Huskies and parties
Date: 30 Sep 92 14:18:42 GMT
Organization: Chevron

In article <mP1-Y-C@engin.umich.edu> chyang@anaphora.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang) writes:
>
>In article <1aai76INNd5i@aludra.usc.edu>, bkowal@aludra.usc.edu (Brian A. Kowal) writes:
>> 
>> I saw on the news the mention of some UW Huskie players that partied a
>> bit too much this last weekend.  Did they get in trouble with the law?
>> Or was is just general no-info news that I heard.
>> 
>> BTW Someone posted that UW, by going to the Rose Bowl three times in a
>> row would break know records needs to go over thier facts again, USC
>> has done it a couple times.
>
>	Yes, you are right on that point.  But no one has won the 
>Rose Bowl three times in a role.

How 'bout twice in a danish....
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: bobj@meaddata.com (Robert Jones)
Subject: Re: Scripps Howard Heisman poll
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:00:08 GMT

In article <1a7jnuINNj5s@agate.berkeley.edu>, wft@soda.berkeley.edu (William F. Tell) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep28.111125.6259@newstand.syr.edu> mwhanley@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Hanley) writes:
|> >In article <1992Sep25.200856.1547@u.washington.edu> tannerg@milton.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner) writes:
|> >>>
|> >>>Here's the latest (9/23) Scripps Howard Heisman poll, a national poll
|> >>>of Heisman voters.  I got it from our local paper here in Tallahassee:
|> >>>
|> >>>Marshall Faulk, San Diego State   45 points
|> >>>Glyn Milburn, Stanford            17
|> 
|> Who's Glyn Milburn?   :-)
|> 
|> Russell White got loads more yardage than either of them this week.

Reggie Brooks didn't do to badly himself with 200+ yards and 3 (I
think) tds against Purdue.  

|> 
|> --William F. Tell
|> UC Berkeley
|> GO BEARS!   #27 in the AP poll.  
|> Returning to a top 25 near you.

Hmmm.  Purdue crushed Cal and ND beat Purdue 48-0.  What does this
mean ND would do to Cal :-)  It is time to start working the Theory of
Transitivity, isn't it?

Bob Jones
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: john@makesys.com (John Turman)
Subject: Re: ND Reigns Supreme (NOT!)
Organization: Make Systems, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 16:40:43 GMT

In article <1992Sep25.214759.8350@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, glongiii@nyx.cs.du.edu (George Long) writes...

>Hey, let's not kid ourselves here.  When it
>comes to football, ND is the best.  End of subject.

>I don't want to hear anything about Miami, that 
>convict-producing, kickback-giving, no class-taking
>joke of a school.

>Maybe they should play Florida A&M every week.
>I don't see them with their own television contract.

>Remember, all you Miami fans:

>We're Notre Dame and you're not.

Who is this asshole, and what rock did he slither out from under? I have no problem
reading and sharing comments with people who have some semblence of intelligence, but
this guy is obviously one of those 2 digit IQ types from the hog farm. Hey son, why
doan you go an' pull yore hat down over yore eyes an' stick a stalk a hay in yore
mouf an go on back to sleep in da barn?

The scary part is that people like this have net access. I personally don't care much
for ND since I am a Canes fan but if I were a ND fan I would consider this post and
poster an embarrassment to my organization. Hey dude, keep it up you are the reason
so many people hate ND. You and people like you that is.

John T.
Go Canes Go Dolphins
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you take yourself too seriously, you'll be the only one who does.

..John "Dolphinatic" Turman...
From: pol30546@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Peder Larsen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: wuck fashington!!!
Date: 29 Sep 92 20:32:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.BvCx2z.D5t
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

joconnor@evax10.eng.fsu.edu (JAMES P O) writes:

>God I am so tired of reading the pac-10 fans wooofin' on east coast 
>teams and how great washoutton is. I hope they take the challange of 
>going to the fiesta bowl with us (FSU or MIAMI) and show  the usa what 
>brand of football UW plays: powderpuf (against pac-10) or hardhitting
>"espn in your face" where even the injured play (i.e. 
>armstead,torretta <UM  baker, m. jones <FSU)

How can Washington play in the Fiesta Bowl when they are commited to 
the Rose Bowl and the Big 10 winner?
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 00:07:47 EDT
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Best marching band
Distribution: usa
 <DPASSAGE.92Sep29163330@soda.berkeley.edu>
 <aelman.717975852@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> <1ao4ufINN8j8@girtab.usc.edu>
 <1992Oct5.074051.1@ducvax.auburn.edu>

In article <1992Oct5.074051.1@ducvax.auburn.edu>, swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
says:

>> In other words, you may hate us, we may be arrogant, but we still are the
>> Best Marching Band in the History of the Universe.

>!!  I like it!!  Pretty funny, pretty funny.  But didn't you mean to post
>this to rec.humor??   ;-)

No.  Remember, the University of Spoiled Children think they ARE the universe.

>(in the History of the Universe???????)

Make sense now?

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
From: kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: wuck fashington!
Keywords: eight men on the line
Date: 2 Oct 92 22:26:50 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Florida State University Computing Center


"Prove it!" Ah yes, the eternal cry of the self-righteous. Well, Chung, I can
give you at least one team that has been using the eight man front for some
time: Virginia Tech. They tried this against us last year, and they had some
success. Of course, they didn't actually have to worry about having recievers
blowing them away in the backfield, because our recievers were almost non-
existent (hell...we have had more TD receptions by wideouts in four games this
year...10 i believe...than we had all of last year...9...again not sure of the
exact numbers...but suffice it to say we have a passing attack this year...now
where ever did we put that pesky running game...).

Oh, and as for the eight man front being "rediculous"...well...back when teams
didn't throw the ball, it wasn't unheard of to have 8 on the line...hell it
was probably the most eefective means of stopping the run. But about the 
constant blitzing off this formation. As the saying goes, "live by the blitz,
die by the blitz." NC state this year tried to hurry up Charlie ward on every
down by blitzing him constantly...bring in all their LB's. This worked for a
bit, but once Charlie settled down he started making them pay for it. You see,
with four...or *ouch* _FIVE_ recievers being put onto the field at once, if
you only have 3 cover men...you will always have at least one man open. The 
trick is to be able to "know" where the open spot is gonna be. Charlie was 
able to do this, and people who are more profiecient with the one back set...
such as Gino Torreta...have an easier time of doing it. Charlie was an option
QB in high school so it is taking some time for him to adjust...but he _IS_
coming along (no INT's this last weekend!).

I'm not saying that Washington isn't having success at using the style of 
defense that they do...that is bovious. What I am saying is that that style
of defense has some _MAJOR_ weaknesses...especially against the more modern
styles of offenses (run-and-shoot variants...etc)

Kevin.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently Jackie Sherril managed to find the balls on the alligator.

MSU 30 - UF 6....has a nice ring to it huh?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: sbanerj@eos.ncsu.edu (SANJEEV  BANERJIA)
Subject: Re: ACC This Week: Predictions and Such
Originator: sbanerj@c00754-400wi.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: Sanjeev Banerjia
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 03:59:46 GMT


In article <9210011929.AA12584@walt.disney>, chill@walt.UUCP (Curtis Hill)
writes:

A nasty week last week.  Very nasty.


This week's game:

Virginia at Wake:  It's be worse than last week, as Welsh won't call
off the dogs.  After a 55-6 thumping, Welsh will say his team isn't playing
well enough to beat a good I-AA school.

UVa 55  Wake 6


Navy at North Carolina:  Will Navy score?  Will Navy have any qb's left?

UNC 38   Navy 3


Pittsburgh at Maryland:  Maryland will no longer be the best team in the
land without a win.

Maryland 41  Pitt 31


NC State at Georgia Tech:  Both teams coming off big wins.  NC State's
been emotionally high for 2 weeks and the game will be on turf.

Tech 24  State 17


Tennessee-Chattanooga at Clemson:  Now this is more like it!  Clemson fans
can get together, get drunk at the tailgate, and discuss who'll be coaching
next year and exactly how many conference games the Tigers will lose this
year.

Clemson 45   UTC 6


FSU at Miami:  Big game.  FSU is #2.


FSU 24  Miami 16



Last: 3-2
Year: 9-3



Curtis Hill
star3!walt!chill@mcnc.org

======

Ohmigawd!  A post of Curtis's that I 100% agree with!  This IS a first...

Sanjeev
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner)
Subject: Re: Wash St. Gets No Respect!
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 17:57:29 GMT

>Cliff Slaughterbeck (crs@stein.u.washington.edu) wrote:
>: wft@soda.berkeley.edu (William F. Tell) writes:
>: >The only teams which really threaten the Huskies chances are Stanford
>: >and Cal, and Washington plays both of those teams at home.
>: 
>: Do not foregt about Washington State.  They destroyed Temple yesterday
>: 51-10, are undefeated and ranked highly in the others recieving votes
>: part of both polls.  They also traditionally give the Huskies hell
>
>Ahh, Cliff, but what we *really* want to see is WSU vs. SMU for all
>the marbles! I think Glenn will concur...
>-- 
>Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
>scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
>(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081

Hey, I've put Washington State on my ballot for the Gupta poll two weeks in 
a row.  Wazzu has impressive road wins over Arizona and Fresno State to go
with easy home kills of Montana and Temple.  The Cougars occupy the 21 spot
in my poll previously held by SMU.  SMU will have to fall to 24-25 after     
Saturday's game.

GT
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Eric Sybesma)
Subject: Re: Miami - FSU
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 19:19:13 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.164328.1795@beaver.cs.washington.edu> fran@cs.washington.edu (Tak Ming Pang) writes:
>
>How good a victory is has nothing to do with the ranking of your
>opponent. Only the performance of the participating teams counts. 
>
How do you judge the performance of the participating teams without
taking into consideration who they are playing?
If you rush for 150 yards against a team that is rated as the 
worst against the run, could you not truly be performing at
a lesser level than if you run for 120 yds against the team
that is ranked the best against the run?

I think you are incorrect.




-- 
Eric Sybesma
University of Michigan
sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu
sybesma@maize.engin.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado)
Subject: Re: wuck fashington!
Keywords: eight men on the line
Organization: Florida State University Computing Center
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 92 03:40:41 GMT

Um, if you are implying that washington somehow started the eight man front,
forget it. That scheme has been around for years. It's good if you are able
to consistently get to the qb, _AND_ if you have 3 defensive backs that can
keep up with all the recievers (4 in the one back, occasionally 5 here at FSU)

Kevin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maimi's latest cheer..."Oh no, wide right"...will Bowden ever learn?




Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Karl C Schudt)
Subject: Re: FSU-Miami-ND
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 02:27:35 GMT

Huh? What? It seems to me that Michigan went back to Ann Arbor with all
*THREE* of their timeouts remaining. If they weren't going for the tie,
how come they didnt call time out when ND failed to move the ball? Also,
since when does mere bad execution constitute playing for a tie? Its playing
for a tie because the linebacker didnt get blocked on the bettis run. Its
playing for a tie because the pass to Lake Dawson at midfield was out of
bounds. It was playing for a tie because they got a penalty.

If Michigan really wanted to win the game, they should have ccalled their
timeouts when ND kept shooting themselves in the foot, got the ball back,
and tried to score.

Sheesh!!!!!
Karl
From: bnoble+@cs.cmu.edu (Brian Noble)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Pac Ten review (10/3/92)
Date: 6 Oct 92 02:52:38 GMT
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon

In article <1992Oct5.211204.672@asuvax.eas.asu.edu> kennedy@asuvax.eas.asu.edu (Ralph Kennedy) writes:
>crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck) writes:
>> The Sun Devils were penalized 13 times for 122 yards including four
>> personal foul calls that assisted scoring drives for the Ducks.
>
>     After watching personal fouls play major roles
>in blowing the Big Game for Cal last year and last
>Saturday's ASU game at Oregon, Coach Snyder has
>finally had enough.  He's announced that from now
>on anyone getting a personal foul for retaliating
>against something the other team has done will be
>taken out and will not return to the game.
>
>--Ralph Kennedy      {ames,gatech,husc6,rutgers}!ncar!noao!asuvax!kennedy
>                        {allegra,decvax,ihnp4,oddjob}--^
>                                          ^---------------The Wrong Choice
>                             internet: kennedy@asuvax.asu.edu


It's about time Bruce started disciplining his players.  But then,
I've ranted on this one before...

Brian
  - Try Hard Bears!
  - Be Dilligent!
  - Ignore the Ink!
(And please don't embarrass yourselves next week.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: hajel@engin.umich.edu (john hajel)
Subject: Big Ten Tie-breaker??
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 92 08:34:05 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor


The official Big Ten tie-breaking rules were posted a
few weeks ago.  Could someone repost them?

thanks,
John Hajel
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college