HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lamontg@stein.u.washington.edu (Lamont Granquist)
Subject: Re: freezing mushrooms in liquid nitrogen
Organization: 'Operation: Mindcrime'
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 07:05:41 GMT

u8802411@cs.uow.edu.au (Malcolm James St Clair) writes:
>	It's about that time of year so I was
>wondering if anybody has had experience preserving
>mushrooms.
>	I have only ever heard that they must be
>consumed fresh (AFOAF has had dried ones but they
>weren't all that good)
>	So i was thinking maybe its the process of
>freezing that destroys the goodies. If so then maybe 
>fresh mushrooms could be dropped into a thermosflask
>of liquid nitrogen, and then placed into a regular 
>freezer.
>	Has anybody tried this ?
>By the way does anybody know the pressure and 
>temperature that foodstuffs are freeze dried at ?

Well, the best thing to do would be to extract the psilocybin and store
with an inert atmosphere in low temperature...

I'd guess that it wasn't the process of freezing, but either that there
was condensation or humidity inside the container, or else that you do
need it to be stored under vacuum or an inert atmosphere.

-- 
Lamont Granquist  lamontg@u.washington.edu
  "When dogma enters the brain, all intellectual activity ceases."
                                      -- Robert Anton Wilson
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: obradovi@feserve.cc.purdue.edu (Zo Obradovic)
Subject: Physiological Effects of LSD
Organization: Purdue University
Distribution: alt.drugs
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 15:33:41 GMT

Can anyone tell me what the physiological effects of LSD are, apart from
the physchological effects (I know what those are). I've heard that it
bonds to serotonin-containing neurotransmitters in the brain, therefore
blocking the serotonin pathway. I've heard that it somehow increases the
internal pressure on the brain. Any truth to these rumors? Any other
effects that I don't know of?? 
                              -Zo
-- 

 obradovi@feserve.cc.purdue.edu
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 23:49:45 EST
From: <SXL136@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: Acid Music (sorry to net.vets)
 <petersen-151192030049@elvex33.acns.nwu.edu>

      If you can get your hands on it, listen to Coil's album: LSD - Love's
Secret Domain. Deeply weird. For an esp. mellow trip, try Saint Etienne's Fox
Base Alpha. If you like techno/industrial, I recommend Pigface's recent Fook.

      Oh yeah, and Pink Floyd. I vote for Relics and Ummagumma.:-)


    -Sean LeBlanc
  -Man is the poet who kills, woman the angel who eats.
                           -Greg Bear, Queen of Angels
From: cd741@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Paul Andarti)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: coke..
Date: 17 Nov 1992 20:44:26 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: cd741@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Paul Andarti)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, lemay@netcom.com (Laura Lemay) says:

>In article <1992Nov16.231416.21811@Cadence.COM> phz@cadence.com (Pete Zakel) writes:
>> In article <oexMaJa00VotM8YWoI@andrew.cmu.edu> Haw Juin Lin <hl27+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>> >There have been many cases where people's noses were completely rotted
>> >off, leaving no cartiledge<spelling??>, no skin, no flesh.
>> 
>> Oh, yeah?  References, please.
>> 
>> Not that I doubt your veracity, but I doubt your veracity.
>
>
>When I was in high school, I worked for a biostats group at
>Massachusetts General Hospital doing data base programming and file
>organization of a study on panic attacks.  By coincidence, the group
>at Mass general that was doing the panic attack study was also doing a
>study on *extreme* cocaine use (I don't remember the exact amounts you
>had to be using to qualify, and I have no experience with cocaine so I
>can't make a guess, but I remember that it was some ridiculous amount
>a day.)
>
>Often when I went down to the clinic to pick up interviews and reports
>from the panic attack people, I passed people who were participating
>in the coaine use study, waiting for thier interviews.  Every once in
>a while there would be a patient whose nose had collapsed entirely
>into thier face.  And it was more than one; I asked the clinic nurse
>about it, and she explained (with some disgust) that those were the
>most extreme cocaine subjects.
>
>I didn't stare so I can't say if all the skin was gone or not, but
>these people most definitely had holes where thier noses should have
>been.  Scared the shit out of me;  I still won't do cocaine to this
>day (although just about every other drug is fair game.. :)

Sounds like someone was yanking your chain.  These people 
must have been very rich to afford so much coke so why
didn't they get plastic surgery??  Either that or they were  
snorting Drano.  Must be why people smoke it now.

Seems like people like to dispell only the propaganda that
they want to (ie stryc in LSD).  Lets try to be rational about
all of it...
P.

-- 
"We're desperate, Get used to it,
  It's kiss or kill" - X
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,talk.politics.drugs
From: camper@buphy.bu.edu (Dan English)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: Shroom advice needed...
Date: 20 Nov 92 17:35:58 GMT
Organization: Boston University Physics Department

In article <1992Nov19.193056.1@vax.sonoma.edu> feinstei@vax.sonoma.edu writes:
>In article <billie.722049091@camelot>, billie@camelot.bradley.edu (Eliot Frick) writes:
>> 
>> My question is simple:  What should one expect when using shrooms?
>> I have heard that there is vomiting involved.  True?
>
>Well, it might be if you get good and drunk first. You might be thinking
>of Peyote. Have you read any of Carlos' books about old Dan Wong and 
>that whole scene?
>
>> Is there anything else one should be wary of?

vomiting is pretty common among my friends with shrooms. this is mostly 
because it is very easy to o.d. on them, and if you do, you will
get pretty sick for about a half hour, then have a wild trip.
make sure you know their strength before taking them.
   -camper.
.
-- 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                             stay groovy.
 camper english   (wow! that drink was camperific!)      @buphy.bu.edu
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: mtymp15@staff.tc.umn.edu (David Hutton)
Subject: re:  two mj questions
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 16:57:26 GMT

In <1992Nov20.081324.8781@u.washington.edu> lamontg@stein.u.washington.edu (Lamo
nt Granquist) writes:
 
>lemay@netcom.com (Laura Lemay) writes:
~
~
>>So I draw upon the wisdom of the net -- did we just happen upon some
>>*really* strong pot?  Is this what's supposed to happen in extreme
>>amounts?  Or was it treated with something, and if so, what?
 
>I don't know.  Over the course of a couple of months I smoked an entire
>quarter one time -- towards the end I got stoned one time and had an experience
>like yours, where I came close to calling 911.  Never happened any other
>time...
 
We would like to say that we have smoked a half-ounce of Skunk Weed (purple and
green and dense with crystals) one night in an attempt to reach satori.  The
attempt proved futile, but I had one of the most profound experiences of my
 
lifetime that night.  I also saw the wind, and heard voices, but I gave in to
what the weed was doing to me instead of fighting it.  This fighting-the-high
is IMHO the number one cause of paranoia and all other side-effects that go
with heavy marijuana consumption.  If you are going to smoke pot, either have
some time to waste and all of your problems worked out to some extent, or face
the vicious circle of paranoia.
 
Use marijuana on a "reward" system, and you will not have problems.  Also, if
you vote Republican you should seriously reconsider your party choice and
perhaps consider smoking LESS weed.  Republicans are evidence of anti-Darwinism
in political thought.
 
Just kidding.
 
No.... really... my parents are Republicans.  I swear.
 
      -Another disillusioned paranoid marijuana user
       Minneapolis, MN
       USA
       The Planet Earth
          Local Cluster, The Milky Way [381.674.33.23 2001]

-- 
send flames, comments, questions, pap smear results, $10,000 in small bills, and
a large packet of neurotransmitter precursors to :  mtymp15@staff.tc.umn.edu
=====->Legalize Spiritual Discovery and Powerful Oxyhematoporphyrin Tools<-=====                 ...have you hugged an Ischiopagus lately?
From: kg1i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kevin Paul Goldman)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Gravity Bong!
Date: 15 Nov 92 22:02:50 GMT
	<1992Nov8.072733.18421@wam.umd.edu>
Organization: Senior, History, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


I saw eons ago a set of instructions on how to make a good gravity bong
posted on this bboard. If anyone has it, or a good clue it would be
appreciated if you could take the time to send me a copy/post the
information.

thanx

Mongo
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez)
Subject: Re: "ex" smokers of MJ
Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 00:50:34 GMT

In article <1992Nov14.114618.29569@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mleayr@nyx.cs.du.edu (matthew leayr) writes:

>Hi,
>     I know several people who used to smoke large amounts of marijuana
>but no longer touch it because it "freaks them out too much" or they "cant
>handle it". When quizzed as to why they don't smoke anymore, they are often
>reluctant to even talk about it and shrug it off. This puzzles me.

Some people feel paranoid when they smoke marijuana.  Here I am using
"paranoid" in a colloquial sense, as opposed to any psychological
definition thereof.  I.e., they feel marijuana makes them alienated,
unable to relate smoothly to people, nervous, depressed, nihilistic, or
whatever.  Some people I know got to feeling this way after smoking a
lot even though they liked it initially.  It's easy to imagine why
people you know might be reluctant to discuss it... they don't want to
go back those unpleasant moments, or have people think they are weird.  

This is an interesting phenomenon... I wonder if it's understood at all
why this happens to some people and not others, why it happens when it
does, etc. --- probably not!
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:38:29 EST
From: <LCM111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: serotonergic trips

To anyone who knows the answer:
I used to trip heavy
Now I dont but I'm on prozac
So...to someone who KNOWS WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT...
What do you hypothesize would happen if I dropped some lsd while
existing on prozac maintenence?
Tell me before my brain explodes!!!
Thank you for your attention,
                             the acid bear
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: ringo@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Ringo)
Subject: Re: Marijuana Legend
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 02:51:20 GMT

Jeremy Matz <ILMJ@cornella.cit.cornell.edu> writes:

>I read in the book, "Marijuan the First Twelve Thousand Years" that there
>is an ancient Chinese myth that after smoking everyday for a hundred
>days, 'one can see spirits'.  I have noticed that after smoking heavily
>(at least once a day) that after a couple of months, the high changed. 
>It seemed to become more hallucinogenic, more philosophical, less silly
>and giggly.  My main interests is the more hallucinogenic part.  Has
>anyone experienced this?  Does anyone know why this happens?

Yeah...I smoked tons o' dope in HS, quit for a few years then started
again full force about 3 years ago. I'm older now, and more acclimated
to the drug. It's no longer a stupid high. I can carry on more or less
real conversations, and in general I'm nowhere near as confused as I
would get in high school. 

So, yeah. The high's changed a lot. What's really funny is I look at 
friends who are just starting to use it, and they act really stupid
when they are high. Just like I used to. I think to myself 'Boy, I'm glad
I don't act THAT retarded when I'm high.' Silly :)


/-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-\
|   As the boistrous fanfare of youth matures, the | John Rescigno, or Trout|
| themes draw themselves out, a more moderate pace | rescigja@calvin.camp.  |
| replacing youth's allegro, yet still it reflects |         clarkson.edu   |
| and embraces the initial melody that gave it its |------------------------|
| identity.                 -- John Rescigno       | Live Free and Honestly |
\-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-/
Xref: sparky alt.drugs:18507 talk.politics.drugs:7497
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,talk.politics.drugs
Subject: Re: Junkies/crack addicts don't try to share the fun?
From: glazier@isr.harvard.edu (Andrew Baker Glazier)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 00:31:11 GMT
Organization: Harvard University, Cambridge, MA


Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: jah@mits.mdata.fi (Jani A. Heinonen)
Subject: Re: coke..
Organization: Microdata Oy
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 13:15:28 GMT

cd741@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Paul Andarti) writes:

>Sounds like someone was yanking your chain.  These people 
>must have been very rich to afford so much coke so why
>didn't they get plastic surgery??

   Because they had spent all their money on cocaine? Perhaps because not
all cocaine users are rich?

>Seems like people like to dispell only the propaganda that
>they want to (ie stryc in LSD).  Lets try to be rational about
>all of it...

   Yeah, let's.
--
Jani Heinonen		jah@mits.mdata.fi		Finger for PGP key
		  Religion is the DMT of the masses.
From: dbragg@dante.nmsu.edu (BRAGG)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: Pamelor
Date: 15 Nov 92 15:25:43 GMT
Organization: New Mexico State University
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Barry Smith (barry@reed.edu) wrote:
: Well, it says here:
: "Pamelor (nortriptyline HCI) is 1-Propanamine,
: 3-(10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[{\it a,d}]cyclohepten-5-ylidene)-N-methyl-,
: hydrochloride.
: 
: 
: 
: Anyone have more accessible information? 
: Effects?  Side-effects? Side-side-effects?
: Dosage? Similar compounds?
: 
: 
: Barry Smith
:	Pamelor's effect is a mood elevator, it will not get you high, if
this is what you want to know inregards to effect. Side-effects include
dry mouth, and constipation. side-side-effect increased depression.
In order for the drug to work, a person must take the drug for three
weeks or more.
                                   david
From: raa@guild.socal.com (Raa Lopez)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: Brands of LSD
Date: 18 Nov 92 01:51:34 PST
Organization: TheGuild[FTS]

The few times I've taken LSD, the best way, for me, was Blue Cheer in an Eye Drop ... but that's My opinion ...

--- Via UCI v1.16 (C-Net Amiga)


     __ ___ ____________ __ __ __ __ __ __
     \//___\\__  ______//_//_//_//_//_//_/ ... UUCP: raa@guild.socal.com
 _____//__//  / / DigiT.W.I.T. Ink. UnLtd. '92! Wheeze Bee JPL!!!
/_________/o /_/o Pffffttt!!!...Pop!!!...Bang!!!.....Etc.!!!?

: The opinions of this user are his/her own and do not necessarily reflect :
: the opinions of The Guild BBS [FTS]. (Especially if he's a DigiTWIT!)    :
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,sci.med
From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer)
Subject: Re: tranzene
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 07:51:02 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.220105.3026071@locus.com> jpaul@locus.com (James Hensley) writes:
>I have been asked to obtain information about the drug 'Tranzene' 
>(phonetically spelled), AKA sinequan.  I have no idea if the spellings
>are right.  My aunt has been perscribed this drug and is having equilibrium
>problems, she keeps falling down.  Is this a known side-effect?
>Any information would be helpful.

There are two drugs involved here.  'Tranxene' is clorazepate dipotassium,
a benzodiazepine sedative related to Valium.  'Sinequan' is doxepin, an
antidepressant.  Both can cause a considerable amount of sedation, especially
in older individuals, who tend to be more sensitive to the effects of
such drugs.  Doxepin can also cause postural hypotension which can lead
to feeling faint upon suddenly getting up.

Your aunt should contact her doctor and describe these side effects so
that her dosages can be adjusted and/or different drugs prescribed.
Falling down is not an acceptable side effect.

-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: dag@col.hp.com (David Geiser)
Subject: Re: Flashback from hell - comments?
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 23:14:54 GMT
Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division


Good imagination?
Flair for the dramatic?
Congenital neuro-chemical imbalance?
PCP?
-- 

 Boycott Colorado.
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: lamontg@stein.u.washington.edu (Lamont Granquist)
Subject: Re: Tolerance?
Organization: 'Operation: Mindcrime'
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 08:08:56 GMT

wiskow1346@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:
>    Is there a tolerance built from marijuana? From my experience I have not
>experienced that, but I have heard different things from people I know and
>conflicting facts from "offical" groups. Also I've always believed in a
>tolerance to LSD [ I haven't done it enough to notice ], but some of my friends
>say it is mostly psychological. What do you think?

MJ -- From what I've been able to gather, yes, there can be tolerance, but it
      depends on the individual.

LSD -- definitely there is a short term tachyphylaxis (very fast production
       of tolerance).  I don't think thats what you mean, however -- you're
       talking about tolerance in trips separated by a sufficient time
       interval?  I'd say that psychological tolerance would be the most
       important factor.  I've never read of a physical tolerance like that,
       but I'd find it legitimate to think that you might not completely
       return to baseline tolerance after recovering from the tachyphylaxis.

-- 
Lamont Granquist  lamontg@u.washington.edu
  "When dogma enters the brain, all intellectual activity ceases."
                                      -- Robert Anton Wilson
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: u9053336@cc.uow.edu.au (Gary James Walker)
Subject: THC acetate
Summary: ?
Keywords: the acetate of Tee Haych See
Organization: University Of Wollongong
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 02:56:54 GMT

 Could someone please post instructions on the
manufacture of THC acetate. I read somewhere 
(cannibis alchemy I think) it's twice as potent
and more trippy. 



information would be much appreciated.

Gary.


-------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: alt.drugs,rec.music.industrial
From: iwood@gauss.math.indiana.edu
Subject: St. Anthony lost his home dir on nyx...
Keywords: has any body seen it?
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 18:57:49 GMT

 If any of you have tried to send me mail at my nyx account, it's dead.
I lost my homne directory. If you find it, let me know. It's pretty small,
less than 100k, but it did the job... It answers to the name of 
aankrom. Heh. 
 Well anyway... If you're still dying to send me mail, send it to 
iwood@shoshone.ucs.indiana.edu... You can also send it to  
iwood@gauss.ucs.indiana.edu, but I prefer the former... Since these are  
both NeXT accounts,  NeXT mail is greatly appreciated! (These are accounts  
that my friend (ex-lover), Indy, never uses, so lets me... blah blah...)
 You can send me your favorite samples via lip service!, etc... Or even  
bits of your band's demo. (For rmi...)

St. A
From: twiggs_te@lrc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: Re: [anonymous] SO's and drugs
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:25:43 EST
Organization: Lenoir-Rhyne College, Hickory, NC

In article <1992Nov6.084328.24577@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>, billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:
> twiggs_te@lrc.edu writes:
> : 
> : 	Simple solution:  Put the MDMA powder in her drink while she's not
> : aware.  I've done this to several people, including a religious extremist, 
> : and every one of them thanked me for it.  How could you be mad at someone
> : for making you feel like that?  Unless, of course, it's bad stuff.  Just 
> : test it first and make DAMN SURE it's richter powder.
> 
> If you did that to me, I would bust your ass into little pieces - then
> feed you to the dogs. I would do that, regardless of how the drug made
> me feel.
> 
> It is a major assault on a person to feed them a drug without their
> permission. Anyone who does so should be locked up for a few years
> to think about their act.
> 
> Bill



	Well, EXCUUUUUUSE ME, Rambo!!!  Maybe I didn't clarify myself.....

	All were very good friends of mine (the religious extremist was my
girlfriend).  All knew I did X.  All had thoughts about trying it.  All were
told by myself that I might do that to them, and I was fully aware that they
would not be mad.

	*SHEESH*.  

	Dogs don't like human meat, anyway.
From: tomf@gte.com (Tom Fawcett)
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
Subject: Re: Shrooms and Honey (?)
Date: 21 Nov 92 23:35:56 GMT
Reply-To: tomf@gte.com
Organization: GTE Laboratories, Inc.
In-reply-to: DICKENJD@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu's message of 18 Nov 92 07:41:56 GMT


DICKENJD@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu (Orpheus) writes:

> 	I have heard that it is possible to culture Shrooms in 
> standard, everyday honey. From what I understand, you put a few
> shrooms in a full (or nearly so) container of honey and wait. THe effect
> is that the honey becomes psychoactive. I don't know whether you are 
> supposed to refrigerate the honey or not (Organic Chemist I am not). One
> thing that sounded interesting about it is that once you have cultured 
> the shrooms in the honey and partaken of said substance that results from
> the process, all you have to do to replenish your supply is add more honey
> and the culture will continue to grow within the 'pure' honey.
> 	Does anyone have any information on this? Has anyone else even _HEARD_
> of this process?


I haven't heard of this, and it sounds like bullshit to me.

It sounds like you're confusing PRESERVING the mushrooms in honey with GROWING
mushrooms in honey.  I don't know whether preserving would work or not, but
honey isn't a growing medium for any psilocybe species that I'm familiar with.
It sounds very unlikely.

On the other hand, I'm not an organic chemist either, so what the hell, give
it a try.  If the mushroom sends out a mycelium network, you're in business.

-Tom
Newsgroups: alt.drugs
From: goddard@cae.wisc.edu (Goddard Denis)
Subject: Bong engineering
Organization: U of Wisconsin-Madison College of Engineering
Date: 17 Nov 92 14:46:33 CST

In article <1992Nov15.033045.11108@muddcs.claremont.edu> ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu (Eli Brandt) writes:
[about quantifying THC/'undesirables' solvation in Bongs]>

>Go to it... I think it's harder than you suggest, though.
>Getting the transfer across the liquid/gas interface should be doable,
>though I don't know how to deal with particulate-phase things, like the THC
>will be.  The bongwater can probably be treated as immobile for the period
>it takes a bubble to rise.  But how does the air in a bubble circulate?  I
>think it must, because diffusion of vapor and Brownian motion of
>particulates isn't going to get you very far.  
>
>Looks simpler to just analyze unfiltered smoke vs. smoke from various
>devices.  Or just look at what's left in the bong.  Think you could get NIDA
>funds for that?  (Hell, if Nichols gets funded to Make Empathogens Safe For
>Mankind... :-)
>
>   Eli   ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu
>
>
 I don't think it's necessary to consider the circulation within the 
smoke bubble. Just use the appropriate dimensionless coefficient correlations
to get the overall mass-transfer coefficient. (i.e., assume that the bubble's 
composition is not dependent on one's position within the bubble, only on the
time spent in contact with the solvent [i.e., bongwater]). 
 Hmmm.... I guess it's time to dig out the ol' mass-transfer book.....

 Sorry I'm just hand-waving so far. This IS the way to attack the problem, 
I'm (pretty) sure. 

 The more ya goad me, the more likely you are to one day (after Midterms!)
see the honest-to-shit equatoins on the Net...


 Denis
 Yet Another Altered Engineer