HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ADB103@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: To JRS et.al-coexist
Date: 5 Nov 92 17:25:29 GMT
Organization: Penn State University


 I am a 26 year old college student (PSU). I voted for Bush in 88 but opted for
 Clinton this time around. I consider myself to be politically independent.  Th
e reason I am posting is to convey my dissappointment with the tenor of the EIB
\RSL over the past few months.  I have been a daily listener of RLS for at leas
t two years; and I think lately Rush has been making the sounds of a desperate
man. I have rarely been philisophically in concurence with Rush, but, I have al
ways considered him to amongst the most interesting\challenging\"gee, I never t
hought of it that way"\ political analysts.  Rush has changed my mind on quite
a number of topics. Where once I was sternly pro-choice, I now lean pro-life. I
 used to consider feminist groups a viable voice in the political arena. Howeve
r, due to Rush's analysis, I no longer consider these groups to posess any poli
tical practicality or  importance.  Unfortunately, Rush's latest rantings have
been so blindly partisan, and pathetically predictable;" 6 out 10 people voted
against Clinton", that I am having trouble taking him seriously.  He has succum
ed to the 92 political climate in a big way. He's just a fat boy blowing rasber
ries to his opposition. I think that Rush should get back to basics-analysis. H
e's only hurting himself with the silly, holier than thou, crap.
  By the way I think John Switzer's comment on starting a coup is one of the mo
st un-patriotic, un-american, self-righteous statements ever made.  Nobody woul
d be more incensed by that remark than President Bush.  His conciliatory manner
 has been most honorable. John,you have no honor.  Perhaps if you started liste
ning to all sides of an issue, instead of blindly following your demigod, Rush,
you might achive a higher level of conciousness.
   Thanks, Ed Beecher
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:7952 alt.politics.clinton:15910 alt.politics.bush:13218 alt.rush-limbaugh:9072
From: archer@elysium.esd.sgi.com (Archer Sully)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Electoral Mandate?
Date: 5 Nov 92 23:13:17 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.  Mountain View, CA

In <1992Nov5.214912.29414@uts.cc.wayne.edu> tom@uts.cc.wayne.edu (Thomas Richard Stevenson) writes:

*Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov> writes:
*
*>In article <1992Nov5.163731.24598@uts.cc.wayne.edu> Thomas Richard
*>Stevenson, tom@uts.cc.wayne.edu writes:
*
*>>And I disagree that we "have work to do ....!". I for one want the Gov.
*>>out of my life as much as possible, and I don't see that with Clinton.
*
*>Then go buy yourself a desert island. 
*
*Where is it writen that you have to agree with your Gov. to love your 
*country? Why should I leave??? Why can't I comment? I'm not trying to
*stop anyone from commenting, please don't try to stop me, or suggest
*"Love it or leave it".
*

Interesting.  The liberal telling the conservative to "Love it or leave it",
and the conservative asserting a right to dissent (which conservative 
governments in the country have done their best to quash).  Fascinating.

*I love my country, but I fear my Gov!
*-- 

Get used to it.  I've felt this way for years.


Archer Sully <archer@sgi.com> | Election '92: a 250 million way tie for last.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,talk.bizarre,alt.politics.clinton
From: mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC)
Subject: Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,misc.test,talk.bizarre,alt.politics.clinton
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 02:47:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.232138.18535@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>In article <1992Nov5.082832.19492JPII@tygra.Michigan.COM> jp@tygra.Michigan.COM (John Palmer) writes:
>>In article <1992Nov5.034239.3528@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC) writes:
>>"
>>"
>>"Since George is on his way out, we will no longer need alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
>>"alt.rush-limbaugh, or alt.politics.bush.  I will be sending out the
>>"rmgroups for these three groups.  Also, since Clinton is now president,
>>"I will create alt.president.clinton.  Since the volume should be large,
>>"we'll hold on to alt.politics.clinton for a while.
>>"
>>"
>>"Ta-ta for now,
>>"M
>>
>>
>>Good idea - I beat you to it!! rmgroups for alt.fan.rush-limbaugh and
>>alt.politics.bush have been sent out as well as a newgroup for
>>alt.president.clinton. I forgot alt.rush-limbaugh - you do the honors
>>for that one.
>>
>Wait a minute--dropping newsgroups merely for supporting tBush??
>
>I thought users were allowed to vote on things like that.
>
>Simon

Hey pal, in case you forgot you already voted and lost.  I'll be sending out
the rmgroups when I get a chance.  Perhaps you could move this discussion
over to alt.wankers.  I'll create it for you.


Ta-ta for now,
M
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8576 alt.rush-limbaugh:9687 alt.politics.clinton:17153
From: mk009b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu ([Matt Kaufman])
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,misc.test,talk.bizarre,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Date: 5 Nov 92 20:29:24 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1992Nov5.034239.3528@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC) writes:



>Since George is on his way out, we will no longer need alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
>alt.rush-limbaugh, or alt.politics.bush.  I will be sending out the
>rmgroups for these three groups.  Also, since Clinton is now president,
>I will create alt.president.clinton.  Since the volume should be large,
>we'll hold on to alt.politics.clinton for a while.


>Ta-ta for now,
>M


Don't be too sure of yourself.  The ratings for yesterday's show was
astounding, their buddy so I'd keep the rush-limbaugh groups if I were you.
It's the best education money can buy.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 22:28:12 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.190227.25938@s1.gov>, lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich) writes:
> 
> 	Look, buster, this is America, and Clinton's our new president.
> 
> 	If you don't like it here, then you can always move to some
> other country. It's that simple.
> 
> 	That's right. America: love it or leave it.
> 
> 	[Note: all this is a satire of right-wing "patriotic" rhetoric.]

Uh, no, YOU listen here. First of all, Clinton IS NOT the president yet, so why
don't you cool off on this 'respect' bullshit that you preach. I seriously doubt
that you showed ANY respect for President Bush. Secondly, John has the right to
voice whatever opinions he wants because, as you have so ingeniously pointed
out, this is America. Remember? Liberals and free speech? It's funny how when a
Republican is president, contempt and disrespect is fashionable. But now that
the Dems are "up to bat" they want a little respect. Well, practice what you
preach bud.
Disclaimers. Disclaimers.
---------
Do you hear the people sing?
 Singing the song of Angry men?
It is the Music of a people who will not be slaves again!
----------
		Possible Republican Creed.
		Vince Goddard
		Jack Kemp in '96
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8369 alt.rush-limbaugh:9446 alt.politics.bush:13750 talk.bizarre:37668 alt.politics.clinton:16839
From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,talk.bizarre,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Date: 11 Nov 92 15:32:08 GMT
Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU
Distribution: usa
Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH

curtis@cs.berkeley.edu (Curtis Yarvin) writes:

>In article <BD.92Nov9101030@fluent.UUCP> bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU writes:
>
>|>|I'm a liberal - which one of the amendments is it I'm
>|>|supposed to not be in support of?
>|>
>|>Uh, the Tenth?
>|>
>|>Guess the water supply in Hanover is kind of low in clueides.
>|
>|The Tenth?  The one that says "The powers not delegated to the 
>|United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the 
>|States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people".
>|
>|I get my water from a well, and since it *is* apparently low on clueides,
>|could you explain in more detail what you're talking about?
>
>Okay, here's the gist of it:
>
>See, what it says is that the powers which aren't delegated to
>the United States by the Constitution, or prohibited by it to
>the States, are reserved to the States, right, or to the people.
>
>Hmm.  I dunno.
>
>Is there a way to say "prohibited" in words of one syllable?

Curtis, you missed my point.  

I understand what the tenth amendment means, what I don't 
understand is what I am promoting, as a liberal, which is in 
violation of that amendment.
-- 
   Brice Dowaliby, Fluent Inc., 10 Cavendish Court, Lebanon, NH  03766
                         bd%fluent@dartmouth.edu        
             I don't speak for them, they don't speak for me
                              DoD # 0698
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,talk.bizarre,alt.politics.clinton
From: bboerner@novell.com (Brendan B. Boerner)
Subject: Re: Liberals want to remove Admendment #10? (was Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization: Novell, Inc. --Austin
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 14:04:06 GMT

In article <1dmsi9INNa87@agate.berkeley.edu> curtis@cs.berkeley.edu (Curtis Yarvin) writes:
>In article <1992Nov9.225116.7508@novell.com> bboerner@novell.com (Brendan B. Boerner) writes:
>>Here's a for instance: suppose I get my jollies juggling whiffle
>>balls.  Do I have a right to juggle whiffle balls?
>
>Shit, you can juggle whatever you want as long as you don't juggle
>_my_ whiffle balls.  Because a man's whiffle ball is his castle.

No problem.  I'll leave your whiffle balls alone.

>>What I think is that it is saying that various _powers_ that gov't are
>>wont to be exercising are reserved for the States or people if not
>>explicitly delegated to the U.S.  Powers, not rights.  IMHO, the US
>>gov. is around to protect my rights (not that it has been doing that
>>good a job of it granted).  If Texas tries to step in and say I don't
>>have a right to juggle whiffle balls, I cry foul and try to get the
>>U.S. to protect my whiffle ball juggling right.
>
>No, it's the other way around.  Texas can do whatever it wants
>to your whiffle balls.  See, when the U.S. was founded, Texas
>was one of the Great Powers of the Southeast and could have sliced
>its butt any time it chose and twice on Sundays.  So the people
>who wrote the Constitution went to great lengths to avoid pissing
>off Texas.
>
>What it says is that, since the Constitution does not explicitly grant
>Uncle Sam the power to take away your whiffle balls, yell "nyah nyah
>nyah" and sentence you to forty years of rock-busting for unlawful use
>of plastic in a public place, if Uncle Sam takes away your whiffle
>balls etc. etc., Texas can pipe up and say, "Yo Sammy boy!  Ain't be
>doin dat shit."  

Well, your analysis doesn't address the question of what can the other
states do (I do grudgingly admit there is life outside Texas :-)).  But
in any case, you do have a point - if the U.S. were to step in and say,
"No more whiffle balls for you", I'd like my state (Texas or otherwise)
to stick up for my whiffle ball rights.  Conversely, if my state takes
away my whiffle balls, I'd like the U.S. to be there to stick up for
me.

>>Why do I think whiffle ball juggling is a right?  Because of my right
>>to privacy (which has been pointed out was been brought before the
>>S.C.  before Roe v. Wade) - I have the right to be left to myself, to
>>pursue my affairs as I see fit.
>
>I hate to say this, boy, it hurts me to, but you sir are out to lunch
>in an accelerated kind of way.

Why?

Brendan
-- 
Brendan B. Boerner		Phone: 512/346-8380
Internet: bboerner@novell.com	MHS: bboerner@novell
Please use ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ if replying by mail exterior to Novell.


Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8495 alt.president.clinton:378
From: phil@ruapehu.ucsb.edu (Philip Papadopoulos)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.president.clinton
Subject: Re: A TRUE LANDSLIDE
Date: 12 Nov 92 19:16:10 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

>Actually, he isn't even President-elect yet.  He won't be that until
>the electoral college votes are counted by Vice President Dan Quayle.
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

A truly scary thought! ;)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.bizarre,misc.test,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.job.gooley
From: amwalker@nyx.cs.du.edu (Art Walker)
Subject: Re: WANKERS
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 07:09:33 GMT

stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton) writes:

>Wow don't they check these weasels at the door?  Nyx must let just
>ANYONE have an account there.

They do... But, now that Nyx is dropping access to the "GIFs" newsgroups,
that should chase most of the weasels off...

- Art

--
- Art Walker (amwalker@nyx.cs.du.edu)
	"It started to hit me like a umm, ah, two-ton heavy thing."
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: shapiro@cfsctc.enet.dec.com (Steve Shapiro)
Subject: Re: New Bumper Sticker
Organisation: SKS Computer Consulting, Inc.
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation - Marlboro, MA
Date:  5 NOV 92 08:40:52 EST


In article <1992Nov4.132506.1@woods.ulowell.edu>, enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes...

>Looks like the bumper sticker business will be good.  I got a great idea to
>make a fortune.  My new bumper sticker/button business.
> 
>**********************************
>* DON'T BLAME ME                 *
>*       I VOTED FOR              *
>*          BUSH QUAYLE           *
>*                NOT             *
>*                  WAFFLE OZONE  *
>**********************************

I don't know if you heard me or not, but a couple of weeks ago I called in to
Claproot & Whitley on the air and told them that if Clinton/Gore won, that in
about a year or so the best business to be in would be the "Don't blame me, I
voted for Bush" bumper sticker business. 

I guess that I'm going to have some competition! 8-)

Hey, care to be a partner and we can monopolize the eastern seaboard?!

Regards,
Steve.

/*******************************************************************
* Steve Shapiro                 * All views and opinions expressed *
* SKS Computer Consulting, Inc. * are my own and are offered as-is *
********************************************************************
* Steve.Shapiro@f440.n101.z1.fidonet.org  BBS: (508) 664-6354 N81  *
*******************************************************************/

Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8502 alt.rush-limbaugh:9591 alt.politics.clinton:17034
Organization: The Leader Desslok School of Diplomacy
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 23:14:41 EST
From: Mark 'Mark' Sachs <MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
 <1992Nov5.082832.19492JPII@tygra.Michigan.COM>
 <1992Nov5.153402.22809@netcom.com> <rdippold.721181889@qualcom>
 <1992Nov12.071925.2654@netcom.com> <rdippold.721592462@qualcom>

>>In <rdippold.721181889@qualcom> rdippold@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
>writes:
>>>What do you expect?  Liberals and free speech go together like oil and
>>>water (respectively).

Perhaps my memory fails me, but I don't recall too many significant
instances of "liberals" fighting free speech, beyond a few trivial
and likely unconstitutional speech codes at universities, and a **JOKE**
posting proposing the rmgroup of alt.rush-limbaugh. In my experience
liberals have been quite forthright in defense of the First Amendment.

Perhaps you can point out a few opposing examples for us?

 "But Dr. Radium, was that necessary?" "Rez, _everything_ I do is necessary."
[Your blood pressure just went up.]        Mark Sachs IS: mbs110@psuvm.psu.edu
DISCLAIMER: If PSU knew I had opinions they'd probably try to charge me for it.
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8102 alt.politics.clinton:16238 alt.politics.bush:13422 alt.rush-limbaugh:9190
From: dos@major.panix.com (Dave O'Shea)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Electoral Mandate?
Date: 6 Nov 92 21:24:23 GMT
Organization: ACME products - artillery division

Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov> writes:

> Then go buy yourself a desert island. I, however, am concerned about
> problems that have been allowed to reach critical proportions by
> people with attitudes just like yours. You
> can sit on your hands and ignore them if you want, but don't come
> crying to me when one of them bites you on your *ss.

There are many intelligent people, myself among them, who believe that
excessive government interference is the *cause* of many of the problems
you're upset about - hardly the solution.

We could as soon ask you to go live on that desert island, since you are the
one who is advocating actively interfering in our financial and personal
affairs.
From: ash50842@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Avumede)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: A step too far...
Date: 13 Nov 92 15:23:43 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) writes:
>All right...

>Limbaugh has gotten to the point where even the most conservative person
>is becoming disgusted with him.


>But Limbaugh's antics over the past few days have gone beyond political
>commentary or even satire...they have become cruel and obnoxious, and show
>no sign of stopping.

>I refer to Limbaugh's treatment and commentary on the Clinton's 12 year old
>daughter.

>Has he nothing better to do then insult a child who has no political clout,
>who has done nothing controversial, whose only "offense" has been to be the
>daughter of Limbaugh's political nemesis?  

>He has gone beyond the bounds of commentator and satirist, and become instead,
>a public nuiesense.

>It's time to bring the bastard down.

I have not yet seen Rush make fun of Clinton's daughter yet, but I don't see
or hear every Rush show.  THat's besides the point.

The point is, he has a right to make fun of people if he so desires.  Many
people made fun of Barbara Bush for being so ugly.  When Saturday NIght Live
did it, it was hilarious.  Why isn't it ethical for Rush to elicit some good
laughs from the audience at the expense of others?  We do it all the time.
It's called humor.

That's what I like about Rush.  I'm not a Republican, and certainly not a
ditto-head, but I enjoy it when he pokes fun at the liberals.  Many of the 
things he says need to be said.  In this case, it didn't exactly need to be
said, but it was all in the name of fun.

Rush isn't a journalist.  He's a ... well he's just a "personality".  He
prevents his views.  He has no standards or ethics to hold to.  It's
perfectly fine for him to do something mean-spirited in the attempts to
make his show more entertaining.

A ban is silly.

-Avumede
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.president.clinton
From: pugh@pico.math.ucla.edu (David Pugh)
Subject: Re: A TRUE LANDSLIDE
Organization: UCLA Mathematics Department
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 22:16:19 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.182720.17264@oz.plymouth.edu> m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu (Michael L. Le Houllier) writes:
>In article <1992Nov10.175225.23414@webo.dg.com> lyford@dagny.webo.dg.com (Lyford Beverage) writes:
>>
>>Actually, it's President-Elect Clinton now.  Won't be President Clinton
>>until January 21, 1993.
>
>Actually, he isn't even President-elect yet.  He won't be that until
>the electoral college votes are counted by Vice President Dan Quayle.
>
>Michael
>
Let's hope Dan can count better than he can spell...

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: hagerjd@triton.unm.edu (John D. Hager)
Subject: Re: Sore LosDEREGISTER
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 92 05:52:21 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1992Nov6.190243.1@woods.ulowell.edu> enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
>It ceases to amaze me how the Liberals are such sore
>winners.  We who call ourselves conservatives have 
>been very gracious to Mr. Clinton saying we hope for
>the sake of the country that he does a good job.  This 
>is a far cry from the teary eyed Liberal attack of 
>George Bush from the Halls of Congress for the past 
>four years.  
>
>We look forward to working with a Clinton Administration
>to bring about the best for America.  However we will 
>disagree with him on pertinent issues.  I wish him luck
>but have this feeling that the American people will
>be fed up with him by June of '93.  Maybe I'll be wrong
>for that is in the best interest of the country.

AMEN!
From: c_caddy@oz.plymouth.edu (Cc)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Music on the Radio Show
Date: 11 Nov 92 16:46:25 GMT
Reply-To: c_caddy@oz.plymouth.edu (Cc)
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, N.H.

In article <92315.231124BJGLEAS@auvm.american.edu> BJGLEAS@auvm.american.edu (bj gleason) writes:
>Does anybody know the name of the music that is played at the beginning of
>the radio show?
>

I don't remember the name of the song or the album, but the group is
The Pretenders.

--
		Clayton Scott "Cc" Caddy
		c_caddy@oz.plymouth.edu	
		Dittohead #10,287,531
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8307 alt.rush-limbaugh:9383 alt.politics.bush:13691
From: eck@panix.com (Mark Eckenwiler)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:25:01 GMT
Organization: Superseding Information, Inc.

In <X6VZTB6w165w@major.panix.com>, dos@major.panix.com sez:
>
>?? Which amendment mentions the right to privacy? I'd love to see it,
>and shove it up the IRS's rectum come April 15. Please do hurry with
>your answer!

It's about ten lines down from "freedom of association," which
guarantees your right to fraternize with other Libertarians.  Oops,
can't find that one.  Off to Political Prisoner Summer Camp you go,
David. 

-- 
        1992 Awards for Yeoman Service to the Democratic Party:
1st prize: Pat Buchanan  2nd prize: Craig Fuller  3rd prize: James Baker
	 Honorable mention: Rich "They aren't Americans" Bond
      * Mark Eckenwiler    eck@panix.com    ...!cmcl2!panix!eck *
From: jason@ab20.larc.nasa.gov (Jason Austin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Bush's promises
Date: 13 Nov 92 08:05:25
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA
Reply-To: Jason C. Austin <j.c.austin@larc.nasa.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ab20.larc.nasa.gov

>> Can someone post the list of Clinton's campaign
>> promises from the Limbaugh Letter?
> 
> How 'bout a list of Bush's broken promises as a standard of comparison?
> 
> -- 
> Russ Anderson    |  Disclaimer: Any statements are my own and do not reflect
> ------------------              upon my employer or anyone else.  (c) 1992
> EX-Twins' Jack Morris, 10 innings pitched, 0 runs (World Series MVP!)

	Sorry, you can't use Bush bashing as a defense of Clinton
anymore.  The election is over, and he now has to stand on his own
character.
--
Jason C. Austin
j.c.austin@larc.nasa.gov


Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: budd@playfair.Stanford.EDU (David Budd)
Subject: Re: Rush is such a bad loser
Organization: Stanford University
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 92 20:27:24 GMT




Well, we might yet get some convictions for the BCCI thing. I understand
that Jimmuh's good buddy Clark Clifford may become some big cons
"first lady," if you get my meaning.
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8291 alt.politics.bush:13675