From: jim@netlink.cts.com (Jim Bowery)
Newsgroups: soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Women for Nerdy White Males?
Date: 17 Apr 92 16:13:50 GMT
Article-I.D.: netlink.RXuDJB1w164w
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA

williamt@athena.Eng.Sun.COM (Dances with Drums) writes:

> In article <1559@tymix.Tymnet.COM> baba@Tymnet.COM (Duane Hentrich) writes:
> >In article <Ry2BJB1w164w@netlink.cts.com>, jim@netlink.cts.com (Jim Bowery) 
> >|> For all you nerdy white males out there, here are some services
> >|> that might be of interest (advertised in a southern californian 
> >|>  "singles" tabloid -- can't vouch for these folks):
> >
> >Do you sit around and try to think up ways to insult men? Or am I 
> >missing the smilies somewhere?
> ---
> 
> 	Why would would you take it as an insult?
> 
> 	It either applies to you or not.  If it does, it is fact.  If it
> doesn't, then you can ignore it.  Either way it doesn't seem insulting.
> 
> 	However, a group that could take it as an insult might be
> white females.  That rich, kind, perhaps eccentric white males would
> actually prefer a woman to a different culture and that there are
> several organizations catering to that preference says something about
> the women in our culture -- or at least the ones these males have
> interacted with.
> 
>     Being a male ready to give up on women and become a monk (I'm not
> attracted in men, so that isn't an option), I can understand the desire
> to find a woman not from this culture.  It seems a large number of women
> I interact with are very strident in one way or another in their demeanor.
> Trouble is, I eventually react to strife with equality.  That negates
> most relationships, so for me, find a woman who is interests me yet
> is not strident is key.
> 
> -wat-
> --
> ***  Dances with Drums  ***
> ***    DoD #0492   Steed: Kawasaki '80 750LTD                             ***
> :: If pro-choice means choice after conception, does this apply to men too? :

Dances with Drums writes:
>In article <1559@tymix.Tymnet.COM> baba@Tymnet.COM (Duane Hentrich) writes:
>>In article <Ry2BJB1w164w@netlink.cts.com>, jim@netlink.cts.com (Jim 
Bowery) writes:
>>|> For all you nerdy white males out there, here are some services
>>|> that might be of interest (advertised in a southern californian 
>>|>  "singles" tabloid -- can't vouch for these folks):
>>
>>Do you sit around and try to think up ways to insult men? Or am I 
>>missing the smilies somewhere?
>---
>
>        Why would would you take it as an insult?
 
The explanation is most probably that he is one of the few remaining
white males who hasn't yet realized that the adjective "nerdy" is 
most descriptive of the way the rest of the culture perceives him.
 
Most of us don't take it as insulting because we're totally inured to 
it, even accepting of it... sort of like black males don't mind being 
called "nigger" if they're raised as slaves in the deep south.  The
only difference is the bull whips are crackin' IN our heads instead of
OVER our heads -- internal moral imprints with which we liberally
ply ourselves rather than externally physical devices which must 
continually be applied to us by an ever present slave master.  (This,
 by the way, is where the perception of the "strident" female comes
 from... she isn't so much an external reality, as an internal task
 master imprinted on us by our culture.)
 
Duty calls and we volunteer, be it enlisting for Viet Nam, the Hitler
Youth or self-emasculation in the Brave New World of Feminism/Gay lib.
 
We'll sit around resisting our instincts to approach females on a 
sexual basis, because that's what Duty calls us to do.  The same 
girl/whores who tell us that is our Duty, then take off and fuck 
some guy who totally ignores the call to Duty, or has psychically 
figured out exactly when it is permissible to ignore it.  As they bump
uglies and make jokes about what nerds we are for sitting around letting 
this happen to us, our humiliation mixes with rage, buliding into a 
nasty little brew of stress/sex hormones in which stews our writhing
limbic systems.  Rage builds.  It is then checked by another set of 
internal bull-whips like "You're being a Neanderthal."  "Maybe you're 
just gay and won't admit it to yourself."  "Male rage is only the reaction 
of an impotent Patriarchy against the liberation of female sexuality 
after 10,000 years of suppression." or simply "Racist, Sexist, Homophobe"
 ... etc.
 
Of course, the media and women that throw these bull-whip imprints
out there don't care that they are being selectively picked up and
self-applied by the most self-disciplined males who ultimately give 
them their food and creature comforts.  The fact that it selectively
debilitates those males is, however, not missed by young males who 
are then desperate to avoid things like technology, farming and other
"nerdy" activities.
 
It is no wonder at all that nerdy white males might decide to
cast off all their internal bull-whips and seek a culture in which
the women are not only not being hypocritical whores, but in which
the women actually appreciate the sense of moral integrity, technical
creativity and adherence to Duty exhibited by nerdy white males.  The
fact there just might be such women and that they might not only not
resent, but may even support the MASCULINITY of the nerdy white males 
must be seen as an irresistable temptation to many.
 
There's Real Money to be made in this market.

--                    
INTERNET:  jim@netlink.cts.com (Jim Bowery)
UUCP:   ...!nosc!ryptyde!netlink!jim
NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 435-6181