HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: budd@playfair.Stanford.EDU (David Budd)
Subject: Re: Al Gore -VP Curse strkes again?
Organization: Stanford University
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 00:53:41 GMT

In article <92Nov17.153106est.56@orasis.vis.toronto.edu> liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.212415.16449@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> howiegbk@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Jr Howard Mea Turner) writes:
>>Al Gore and Dan Quayle both served on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
>>I hardly think Sen. Gore is more qualified than VP Quayle in terms
>>of foreign policy.  Quayle handled himself well when the F-16's were called
>>in to buzz the Philipinnes palace.  Gore might have done the same,
>>but as of this instant, QUAYLE HAS MORE EXPERIENCE.  What did Al do
>>during the Persian Gulf . . . does the word waffle mean anything to
>>anyone?
>>
>
>Gee, I wonder why Prez. Bush didn't sent "expert" Quayle to 
>Alexander Dubueck[sp?]'s funeral last week -- ya know, "the man
>who crushed Prague Spring in 1968" -- when Mr. Quayle is about
>to become a reporter for the Indiana National Guard.  


I believe that the Czechs use the cyrillic alphabet, so that there
could be more than one way to speel the name. But the
accepted and customary way to spell it is "Dubcek."

That aside, Dubcek was not the man who crushed the Prague Spring
in 1968. Rather, it was he who, through his policy of creating
"Communism with a human face," brought bout the "Prague
Spring." 

It was the soviets, and their premier Leonid Brezhnev, the "evil empire"
which the republicans rightfully battled; the same soviet union that
bill clinton visited one year later, who cruelly crushed the
movement.



--
David Leung-tak
"You can always tell a Harvard man. You just can't tell him very much."
"A day without sun is night."
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton
From: hulsej@lclark.edu (Jose Hulse)
Subject: Re: Rush lets something slip ...
Organization: Lewis & Clark College, Portland OR
Distribution: world, na
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 01:46:24 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.195540.10044@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes:

>Rush then said that "I have had girls say no for a lot of other reasons, but
>this was the only time because of papaya juice."
>
>Hmmm, Mr "Unmarried Sex is a Sin" just stated that he was soliciting sex
>from 'girls',  and he also admitted that he wasn't having a lot of luck.
>
>Maybe that is why he is so down on Kennedy's philandering?  Because Kennedy
>is successful while Rush is striking out?

Well, _look_ at Rush for God's Sake (tm)!  Is it any wonder he's struck out??
And I understand he's lost quite a bit of weight in the last few months!
How old is he, anyway?  Late thirties/early forties?
-Jose'

-- 
_______________________________________________
Jose' Hulse  hulsej@lclark.edu |  Four years ago, Bush said that if I voted 
for Dukakis I could expect crime,taxes and the deficit to go up.
I guess he was right...I voted for Dukakis and look what happened!
From: jason@abi1.larc.nasa.gov (Jason Austin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why Rush is a Jack Ass
Date: 19 Nov 92 13:53:11
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA
Reply-To: Jason C. Austin <j.c.austin@larc.nasa.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: abi1.larc.nasa.gov
In-reply-to: be231642@longs.LANCE.ColoState.Edu's message of Wed, 18 Nov 1992 17:47:17 GMT

In article <Nov18.174717.15232@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> be231642@longs.LANCE.ColoState.Edu (Bret Egan) writes:
-> 
-> First of all he is farther right than Adolf Hitler.

	Support?

-> Assuming television and the media are liberal institutions, why would he be
-> caught dead surrounded by liberalism?

	To provide an alternate viewpoint.

-> His audiance consists of old people who up till two weeks ago still had a voice
-> in our government.  The same people who thought that the debt accumulated over
-> the last twelve years was functional for our country, are gloating right now
-> about the lower taxes they paid during Reagan/Bush.  

	That's true if anything over 10 is old.

-> Rush denies that their is anything wrong with OUR environment.  That is not only
-> being ultra conservative, but also being ignorent.  Why should Rush care about
-> the quality of his drinking water or the air he breathes (living in NYC)?
-> That argument holds true for our corporate execs.  They (their company) can pollute almost
-> without any interference from the EPA, but when the environment goes to hell they
-> can jet off to some foreign country to breath.  Al Gore will stop this "Look the
-> other way" EPA enforcement of Pollution laws.
-> The hole in the ozone EXISTS!  

	If you can prove it, I will believe it.  Global cooling is
true!

-> Rush should know (or maybe he doesn't) that as a country WE elect our president,
-> not Republicans or Democrats, conservatives or liberals.  We stood behind
-> Reagan/Bush as trickle down increased our Debt.  We should now stand behind Bill
-> Clinton as he approaches the office that we elected him to.  Meanwhile Rush can
-> continue his attacks on our President for the next four years.  

	That's what American is all about.  The freedom to insult your
leaders.

-> Rush and all the other conservatives are scared to death that the baby-boomers
-> are slowly entering our government.  Twenty five years ago our government tried
-> to oppress the "Counter Culture" by ending their rallies and demonstrations.  Now
-> we elected two men who were taking part in those very same events.  To scare you
-> some more, our president and veep also listen to the Grateful Dead.  Isn't
-> America great?
-> 
-> Bret 

	If you think all the baby boomers think the same, you need to
get out of the house more.  
--
Jason C. Austin
j.c.austin@larc.nasa.gov


Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: mk009b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu ([Matt Kaufman])
Subject: Re: IMHO - What does it mean?
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 09:06:34 GMT

In <1992Nov19.085504.18122@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> wr001b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (william e raftery) writes:

>In article <=zlq2-k@lynx.unm.edu> hagerjd@carina.unm.edu (John D. Hager) writes:
>>>are going to be misled. IMHO both the strident anti-Rush people and the 
>>----I keep seeing this acronym and I have no idea what it means.  Could
>>    somebody please send me some e-mail and explain it?  Thanks.
>>   
>>    John D. Hager
>>    hagerjd@carina.unm.edu
>>

>IMHO stands for:
>	In
>	My
>	Humble
>	Opinion

or In
   My 
   Honest
   Opinion

Matt
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:38:56 GMT
Subject: Re: Sniveling Whiny Conservatives
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

> Though you're wrong in your observations, this is kind of funny.  (Further
> confusion for you...  still baffled by my Quayle-joke?)
> 
> >I mean, my God, he's married to a strong woman, too!  What on earth is
> >this country coming to?
> 
> I know!  Just like Dan Quayle and George Bush!  How awful!

Dan and George are married?  Which one plays the role of woman?

> 
> You're still expecting him to be off the air by the end of the year, aren't
> you?
> 
> Say, have you checked the Nielsens lately?

What are they?  I am curious.  I know that a number of my moderate
friends and I who watched Rush for a laugh during the election have
since stopped, because he is becoming far too tiresome to continue
wasting valuable time wathcing.    

doug
From: paT bUcHAnaN
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh and Fundamentalism
Date: 23 Nov 92 00:44:31 GMT
Organization: Allegheny College

In article <1992Nov22.214919.5688@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux,  
just drieux) writes:
> delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE) writes:
> ] 
> ]    I have a gf with fundamentalist parents who treat Rush Limbaugh as  
though
> ]  he has the answers to life's problems. Well, I am here to say that  
because
> ]  of this, I will have to fight in order to marry her. Has it come to  
the point
> ]  in this country where conservative ideas like the ones he presents  
are so
> ]  much a part of the United States now, that two people in love can't  
even
> ]  marry for fear of outright attack like this? I fear for our  
happiness.
> ]  I don't want her to choose between keeping her family or keeping me.
> ]  I hate liberals (I am moderate), but even moderates aren't safe from  
Rush
> ]  Limbaugh!! Can someone PLEASE give me some ideas???
> 
> 
> well one of the first places to start with is 
> the fact that RUSH is clearly AntiChristian and
> AntiBible as he is NOT willing to stand up against
> the FACT that it is the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT which is
> depriving us of our GOD GIVEN BIBLICALLY SUPPORTED
> right to own slaves and concubines.
> 
> 
> As long as the Satanists out there are able to pull the
> wool over people's eyes about how the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
> is in LEAGUE with the Anti_Christ, people like RUSH
> will be allowed to consider themselves 'conservatives'
> as well as supporters of some alledged 'christian agenda.'
> 
> 
> As Long as these SATANIC KULTS are allowed to FLURISH
> in the US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT no one is SAFE!!!!
> 
> Only By REVEALING the WRITTEN WORD OF GOD, THE ONE
> TRUE HOLY GOD, Can we Defend the Country from the
> SATANIC INFLUENCES!!!!!
> 
> 
> ciao
> drieux
> 
> ps: tweleve years of the 'alledged' religious right
> being in power, and still no restoration of our God Given RIGHTS!!!!
> 
> pps: also given that RUSH is thus in LEAGUE with the AntiChrist
> he must be BURNED AT THE STAKE!!!!
> 
> 
> -- 
> Modern Day Problems:
> Little Miss Muffett, sat on a ToughtIt,
> Eating her Kurds and Weighs, Along came a Spider,
> and she drove off with the Neat Guy with a HOT CAR!

You make no sense.  Maybe you should be burned at the stake.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way)
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch Day 15
Organization: New Mexico State University, MetaPhysical Science Laboratory
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 01:15:31 GMT

>>>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 1992 01:14:57 GMT, jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) said:

John> November 17, 1992
John> Dateline - Santa Barbara, CA

John> It's now 15 days after Bill Clinton's election and Rush is still on the 
John> air with 532 radio affiliates and 207 TV affiliates.
John> -- 

And Limbaugh remains a jerk.

L.
"Yeh, Buddy..            | larry@psl.nmsu.edu (Larry Cunningham)|  _~~_
 I've got your COMPUTER! | % Physical Science Laboratory        | (O)(-)
 Right HERE!!"           | New Mexico State University          |  /..\ 
 (computer THIS!)        | Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 88003    |   <> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are CORRECT, mine, and not PSLs or NMSUs..
Oh! There's the deuterium.. Now where did that plutonium get off to?
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: pugh@pico.math.ucla.edu (David Pugh)
Subject: Re: Rush's book
Organization: UCLA Mathematics Department
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 23:36:45 GMT

>Well, it seems that Rush Limbaugh's book has returned to
>it's lofty #1 position on the New Yorks Best-Seller list. (non-fiction,
>hardcover)
>
>Madonna seems to be going down ... And Rush is now atop her.

I bet she's crushed...

>Lee

David

--
|-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-|
 David A. Pugh      | Hot Dog, Jumping Frog, Albuquerque            > PREFAB
 pugh@math.ucla.edu | Best agree you and me we're only nightingales > SPROUT
|-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-|
From: kebarnes@memstvx1.memst.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: RE: Music on the Radio Show
Date: 22 Nov 92 07:39:27 -0600
Distribution: usa
Organization: Memphis State University

In article <1992Nov22.000319.4172@memstvx1.memst.edu>,
kebarnes@memstvx1.memst.edu sez:

*********************** A CORRECTION! *************************

> In article <1992Nov19.094004.19823@meaddata.com>,
dlovely@meaddata.com (David Lovely) writes:
>> In article <1992Nov13.161649.4071@memstvx1.memst.edu>,
kebarnes@memstvx1.memst.edu wrote:

<lots of fun stuff deleted>
 
>> |> Now for the bonus round! Who can name the most current and historical
>> |> update themes?

 
>> |> President Slick Willie Update: "Pressure" by Billy Joel from ?
>> |> [What album? -- P.S., I think there's a song by The Who that's a better
>       fit.]
>> 
>> "Pressure" can be found on "The Nylon Curtain" (1982).
>> 
> 
> Correct. Thank you for playing.
> 
> Hint: The Who song is from "Tommy".

My hint was wrong! It's actually from "Who's Next" (1971)

-- 
*.x,*dna**************************************************************
*(==) Ken Barnes, LifeSci Bldg.                                      *
* \'  KEBARNES@memstvx1.memst.edu                                    *
*(-)**Memphis,TN********75320,711@compuserve.com**********************
"When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President;
I'm beginning to believe it."--Clarence Darrow
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion
From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: ATTENTION!!!
Summary: Can I go back to sleep now? 
Organization: Rice University
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:01:06 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.051133.13260@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
><BxI8IG.873@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>><1992Nov10.002342.22401@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney):
>>>After weeks of painstaking construction and programming, we now have a
>>>channel on IRC (Internet Relay Chat) devoted to... you guessed it...
>>>DITTOHEADS.
>>>
>>>Go to the channel #Limbaugh and you will find the DittoBot, a new bot
>>>I have put together to run this channel; in addition, you might find
>>>other Rush Limbaugh fans. 
>>
>>...or, more likely, we'll just find you acting like a robot, which is more of
>>the same old story.
>>
>>>#Limbaugh was designed as a gathering ground for us conservative
>>>thinkers, to talk to each other when we are not huddled around the
>>>last great bastion of conservative power in the world, for 3 hours a 
>>>day.
>>
>>...or when you (the specific, not the general) are threatening other folks
>>on Usenet through a different network.
>
>Geez, is Chaney still talking about taking over the government, like the
>peaceful pro-lifer that he is?

Of course.  Do you expect the leopard to change his spots? :-)  (Of course,
that's assuming he's even participating on Usenet any more -- he seems to
have been quiet lately.  I wonder why? :-)

>I was in Egghead the other day and I thought of Chaney...  needless to say
>I didn't buy anything.

I can go you one better -- there are two Egghead locations here in Houston,
and the last time I visited either one of them was last summer.  Needless to
say, with what I know now, I won't be returning any time soon.

--PLH, thanking the applicable deities for CompUSA...

-- 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: crb2@Ra.MsState.Edu (Chad R. Berthelson)
Subject: Re: Think about it
Keywords: commie-libs
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:06:56 GMT

grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:

>But there isn't some liberal with his own radio talkshow, none that comes 
>anywhere within the orbit of Rush.  Kinda makes you wonder, if the media is
>supposed to be a big liberal conspiracy, why they can't set up one of their
>own kind to spread that foul liberal filth in opposition to Rush.

On this note (along with the rest) you are wrong!  There are plenty of
extremist liberals on radio, listen to your local talk radio station
sometimes.  Ellen Ratner (sp?) has one, she's more left than anyone
I have ever heard utter a word.  I have heard others (don't remember
names), one guy is out of Chattanooga (sp?) another from New York that
followsRush on the Greenville, MS. station (calls his show 'Radio Graffeti'
 I think).   Or if all else fails listen to PRN (which BTW you pay for).

I grant you that they are nowhere NEAR as popular as Rush, but neither
are their views....

Chad

--

Chad R. Berthelson		Graduate Research/Teaching Assistant
crb2@ra.msstate.edu		Biological Engineering
cberth@abe.msstate.edu		Mississippi State University
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
From: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: usa
Date: 21 Nov 92 00:28:02 GMT

In <1992Nov20.230532.24506@rchland.ibm.com> jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl) writes:

>In article <1992Nov17.162705.24794@galileo.physics.arizona.edu>, krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes: 
>|> But he has already promised to screw up, by saying that he will remove 
>|> the ban on gays in the military, etc.  I have not heard one of his 100 
>|> day promises which is not a screw up, at least IMO, therefore, as far 
>|> as I am concerned, HE ALREADY HAS SCREWED UP!!!

>As you conservative, apple pie, gun-toting folks like to say:

>"America.  Love it or Leave it!"

>|> 
>|> Ted (author and originator of the term `Zackane') Krueger
>|> 
>|> 
>|> -- 
>|> "We will bury you! We will bury you! We will bury you!"
>|>       - some ex-Soviet leader            
>|>                    krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu

>It was Kruschev.  And he meant economically bury us.

Who knows what Nikita meant.  But I don't subscribe to this point of view. :)

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch - Day 17
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: usa
Date: 20 Nov 92 16:28:55 GMT

In <1992Nov19.202342.4109@wkuvx1.bitnet> hargijk@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:

>In article <1992Nov19.230907.3411@seq.uncwil.edu>, session@seq.uncwil.edu (Zack C. Sessions) writes:
>> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>> 
>>>It's now 17 days after Bill Clinton's election and Rush is still on the 
>>>air with 536 radio affiliates and 207 TV affiliates, and his book is 
>>>number one on the NY Times hardback non-fiction best-seller lists.
>> 
>> Huh? So what? What has this got to do with the price of eggs in China?
>> > -- 

>Who Cares about the price of eggs in china!

I do!  I do!


Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:9031 alt.rush-limbaugh:10262 alt.politics.bush:14008
From: krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Date: 21 Nov 92 06:16:41 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson AZ

In article <1992Nov21.010351.10145@seq.uncwil.edu> session@seq.uncwil.edu (Zack C. Sessions) writes:
>krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:
>
>>Ted (author and originator of the term `Zackane') Krueger
>      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Which took one hell of a lot of originality and immaturity. If I were you,
>I wouldn't admit to such childish comments. To revert to that type of name
>calling just because you don't agree with me doesn't look very well on you.
>
>
>-- 
>Zack Sessions
>sessions@seq.uncwil.edu
>University of North Carolina at Wilmington (Alumnus)
>"Good health is merely the slowest form of dying."

You may not have liked my joke, Zack, but it was good enough to make 
it to alt.best.of.internet!

Ted

-- 
"We will bury you! We will bury you! We will bury you!"
      - some ex-Soviet leader            
                   krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu
From: hogue@cs.arizona.edu (Justin C. Hogue)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Here Are The Undeniable Truths of Life
Date: 18 Nov 92 03:23:40 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <grendel.722041805@camelot> grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:
[stuff deleted]
>>24. Feminism was established so that unattractive women could have 
>>    access to the mainstream of society.                           
>Absolute bullshit, possibly the most offensive of Limbaugh's bogus "truths".
>Limbaugh insults and ignores what he does not understand or what makes him
>uncomfortable.  He prefers to wallow in his own illusions.  This contention
                                                 ^^^^^^^^^
  I suppose his "right wing" illusions are worse than the "left wing" 
illusions.  Education (a very ambiguous one) solves everything.  Getting
rid of weapons will rid us of war (unless one guy siezes the moment).
Affirmative action will relieve us of all racism: although ignorant I admit,
many people will blame minorities for their problems, citing that the minority
couldn't compete for the job, but was placed there simply because of their
minority status.  This would cause even more hatred.   
  I, like most people, don't agree with 100% of Rush's (if I may call him
that) ideas, but who agrees with 100% of anybody's?  What he thinks you
consider illusion, what you think I consider illusion.  Besides, who does
understand the feminist movement?  I just thought of it as low esteemed 
women.  My girlfriend is smarter and more charasmatic than I, and I consider
her "better" than myself, and she didn't have to partake in any Feminism
thing to prove that to me or anybody.
  I'm finished now. 
 --------------------------Jowfus   hogue@cs.arizona.edu------------------------
 | Before I die I plan to do one of two things: Solve the saw function problem |
 | or find a program that works better in COBOL than any other language.  Both |
 | are impossible.                                                             |
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8714 alt.president.clinton:493
From: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca (ochealth)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.president.clinton
Subject: Re: Al Gore -VP Curse strkes again?
Date: 17 Nov 92 08:50:39 GMT
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca

In article <1992Nov16.080042.8762@netcom.com> mvp@netcom.com (Mike Van Pelt) writes:
:In article <1e0vn9INNq5t@transfer.stratus.com> dennist@sw.stratus.com (Dennis Tetreault) writes:
:>   After 4 years of listening to everyone trash Dan Quayle, everyone seemed
:>to think that we would have a new VP with stature, ability, and stateliness.
:>Al Gore.
:>   Something happened though.  [Algor falls off stage into crowd;
:Algor gets lost in the woods.]
:
:Jay Leno mentioned the same thing just the other night.  He
:wondered just what it was about the vice presidency that
:causes anyone who wins it to drop 15 points off their IQ.

Even if true, at least Gore would still be at or above an IQ of 100.
:
:-- 
:Mike Van Pelt          | It was a typical net.exercise -- a screaming
:mvp@netcom.com         | mob pounding on a greasy spot on the pavement,
:mvp@hsv3.lsil.com      | where used to lie the carcass of a dead horse.


-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
jpm: ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca         
                            Happily using OS/2 2.0 because MS Windows isNT ___
                                                      Insert VapourFeature ^^^
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh