HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Date: 13 AUG 92 01:35:44 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: "L. Stuart Vance" <VANCE@TGV.COM>
From: "L. Stuart Vance" <VANCE@TGV.COM>
Subject: Re: MultiNet Authentication Services (aka Kerberos support for VMS)
Organization: TGV, Incorporated
X-Phone: 408/427-4366 (work); 408/427-4365 (fax)
X-Address: 603 Mission Street; Santa Cruz, CA  95060 (work)

>could you please post the part numbers and prices for US and Canada?

Part #		Description					Price
------		-----------					-----
MAS		MultiNet Authentication Services Doc/Dist	$150
DO-MAS		MultiNet Authentication Services Doc Only	 $15

Regards!
-----Stuart
From: doelz@urz.unibas.ch
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: Repost: SLIP configuration problem 
Date: 20 Aug 92 12:45:04 MET
Organization: University of Basel, Switzerland

Has anyone sucessfully managed to run SLIP over LAT yet ? 


Any hint welcome. 
Regards 
Reinhard 



In article <1992Aug10.095438.37877@urz.unibas.ch>, doelz@urz.unibas.ch writes:
> I would like to run the following setup: 
> 
> +--------------------+
> |                    |           +-----------------+             +--------+
> |    Multinet 3.0    |           |  DECServer 200  |=============| UNIX PC|
> |                    |           +--------+--------+   19200 bd  +--------+
> +---------+----------+                    !
>           !              Ethernet         !
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> In order to do this, I followed Aaron Leonard's cookbook and did a 
> LATCP>  create service gate_sl0 /ID
>         create port lta9960 /dedicated
>         set port lta9960 /dedicated /service=gate_sl0
> $ define/system slip0 lta9960:
> $ set term/passall/perm slip0
> 
> and/after logged in to the vax via LAT, 
> $ mu set/inter sl0/slip=slip0/up
> 
> The only sad thing is that this doesn't work. 
> I set up the interface as static SLIP, with slip0 as terminal device. 
> 
> Any hints mostly appreciated. 
> Regards 
> Reinhard 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************
>     Dr. Reinhard Doelz            *   RFC     doelz@urz.unibas.ch
>       Biocomputing                *   DECNET  20579::48130::doelz
> Biozentrum der Universitaet       *   X25     psi%022846211142036::doelz
>    Klingelbergstrasse 70          *   FAX     x41 61 261- 6760 or 267- 2078
>      CH 4056 Basel                *   TEL     x41 61 267- 2076 or 2247   
> ************************ S W I T Z E R L A N D *************************
> 
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
From: pm@fennel.cc.uwa.oz.au
Subject: No copy of returned mail for POSTMASTER - help please
Organization: University of Western Australia
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 08:26:39 GMT


 We have a problem with our SMTP mail.

On most systems I have used, an undeliverable mail message is returned
to the sender, and a copy of the rejection is also sent to the
'postmaster' of the rejecting host.  On this machine, running VMS V5.2
and Multinet V3.0A, no copy is being sent to the postmaster. 

I have tried to RTFM (Multinet) but can find no reference to having a
copy sent to postmaster.  We have postmaster defined to be a local user
and anything mailed to postmaster is received there.  Below is the header
of a rejection message sent to a local user who subsequently forwarded
it back.  What has to be done to have an automatic CC: sent to
postmaster?   (I might add that no copy is going to SYSTEM instead.)


Gaye Harvey (Help Desk and Postmaster)	Internet: pm@fennel.wt.uwa.edu.au
University Computing Services		Phone:    09 380 2606   (+61 9 380 2606)
The University of Western Australia	Fax:      09 380 1014   (+61 9 380 1014)


========================================================================
Header from a rejection (no copy received by postmaster because no copy 
SENT to postmaster)

From:	SMTP%"Postmaster" 18-AUG-1992 19:45:18.43
To:	<ARKEO3>
CC:	
Subj:	Undeliverable Mail

Date:     Tue, 18 Aug 1992 19:45:02 +0800 (SST)
From:     Postmaster@FENNEL.WT.UWA.EDU.AU
Subject:  Undeliverable Mail
To:       <ARKEO3>
Comment:  Bad address -- <MVHUYSTEE@ALF.LET.UVA.NL>
Comment:  	Nameserver error: No address associated with name

Start of returned message
[...]
From: alanmoore@yang.earlham.edu
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: Maximum mail messages under POP3
Date: 17 Aug 92 11:31:18 EST
Organization: Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana

We are using the POP3 protocol from a Mac and can't seem to read more than 50
messages at a time from the VAX.  Is there a parameter I can set somewhere to
increase the number of messages the POP3 server will deliver?  As I understand
it, it is a problem on the VAX end, not the MAC (for a change).

Alan Moore                              alanmoore@yang.earlham.edu
System/Network Manager, Postmaster      (317)983-1437
Earlham College
Richmond, IN
From: madison@Drago.TGV.COM (Matt Madison)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: Re: no copy of returned mail to postmaster
Date: 19 Aug 92 20:53:54 GMT
Reply-To: madison@tgv.com
Organization: TGV, Incorporated

In article <2D80054519AUG92161652@TGV.COM>, "Kasey Briggs, 792-2134" <BRIGGSK@Citadel.edu> writes:
>We had a similar problem here caused by a Multinet default that you should
>check.  Multinet 3.0 set up a logical for postmaster (I can't remember exactly
>what the logical was called; you can show logicals for *post and catch it if
>it's there) which forwarded mail to System.  We only use System for installs,
>so nobody was getting the errors  

The logical name is POSTMASTER.  That's what was causing your other problem:

>Since this happened, we've taken the precaution of forwarding System's mail to
>postmaster.  My big complaint about Multinet's defaulting to System is that
>it was messing up my BITNET error mail too.

In MultiNet V3.2, the logical name MultiNet uses to identify the SMTP postmaster
will change to MULTINET_SMTP_POSTMASTER, which should prevent the kind of
interference you were having with Jnet.  The logical will still default to
SYSTEM if you don't tell it otherwise.

-Matt
--
Matthew Madison | madison@tgv.com    | +1 408 427 4366
TGV, Inc.       | 603 Mission Street | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 18 AUG 92 20:09:56 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: "W. Todd Wipke" <wipke@SECS.UCSC.EDU>
From: "W. Todd Wipke" <wipke@SECS.UCSC.EDU>
Subject: Multinet 3.1 Finger                                             
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

The new finger program gives every process in the vaxcluster instead
of the main logins, and it doesn't give idle time etc.  its cute, but
the first time I fingered the vax cluster from a unix node, the delay was
so great I thought the network was down.  Since SHOW USERS/FULL gives the
same information for vms, there isn't much need for this expanded feature
IMHO.  If we want the old finger display can we use the 3.0 image with 
version 3.1 of Multinet? or is there a logical that changes FINGER behavior?

Todd Wipke
Molecular Engineering Laboratory
UCSC
wipke@secs.ucsc.edu

Xref: sparky vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet:1975 vmsnet.mail.mx:827
From: ake@dayton.saic.com (Earle Ake)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet,vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: Re: FROM: headers inaccurate
Date: 18 Aug 92 13:15:55 EDT
Organization: Science Applications Intl. Corp., Dayton, Ohio

In article <0095F456.DE2ACF00.3815@CVAX.IPFW.INDIANA.EDU>, "Joe Dillon, IU - PU at Fort Wayne, DP Dept." writes:
> I need help in solving a mailing problem.  We have an IBM bringing in BITnet.
> Our VAXCluster accepts IBM's BITnet with Jnet.  The VAXCluster also runs
> Multinet.  We have Novell networks running CC:Mail.  CC:Mail's product, 
> SMTPLINK, is running on a Sun to link VMSMail and CC:Mail.  (I liken this to 
> a triangle with one side open - Novell to IBM) MX has been installed recently 
> to smoothly link forwarded accounts.  At that time Multinet's SMTP server was
> disabled.
> 
> The problem:  FROM: headers are being stripped on forwarded accounts only if
> the account names involved in the forwarding are the same.  (i.e. VAX account,
> Dillon, is set to forward to CC:Mail account, Dillon.  Someone, lets say Bush,
> sends mail to VAX account Dillon, CC:Mail account Dillon sees it as coming 
> from VAX-Dillon, not Bush)
> What works is VAX-dummy set to forward to CC:Mail-Dillon, Bush sends same 
> message in the same way.  CC:Mail-Dillon sees it as from Bush and sees 
> VAX-Dillon was involved too.

	The problem is the cc:Mail gateway.  It is seeing the header that MX
added "Reset-From:" and uses that as the "From:" header instead of cheching to
see if the "From:" string starts in column 1!

	We reported this to the cc:Mail folks back when we had 1.2 and they
fixed it and gave us a new image.  Guess what?  When 1.30 came along, the bug
was back!  They fixed it in beta but it didn't get to the regular release.

	We just received notice of a beta 2.0 of the gateway.  Maybe they finally
have it fixed.


-Earle
_____________________________________________________________________________
             ____ ____    ___
Earle Ake   /___ /___/ / /     Science Applications International Corporation
           ____//   / / /__                 Dayton, Ohio
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet: ake@dayton.saic.com  uucp: dayvb!ake  NSI-DECnet (SPAN): 28284::ake
From: wipke@SECS.UCSC.EDU (W. Todd Wipke)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: Re: vaxcluster sharing of Multinet configurations
Date: 19 Aug 92 18:17:27 GMT
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: "W. Todd Wipke" <wipke@SECS.UCSC.EDU>

>From:	MX%"Adelman@TGV.COM" 19-AUG-1992 08:44:33.65
>To:	WIPKE
>CC:	
>Subj:	Re: vaxcluster sharing of Multinet configurations
>
>From: adelman@TGV.COM (Kenneth Adelman)
>To: wipke@SECS.UCSC.EDU
>CC: info-multinet@TGV.COM
>
>> What is the recommended procedure if one wants to make a vaxcluster
>> have identical MU configs for NFS on all nodes (for example by pointing
>> to the same definition file for nfs-group and uid,gid etc)?
>
>    The NFS.CONFIGURATION file is by default in the VAXcluster common
>directory. If you want different configurations, but the file in
>the specific directory.
>
>								Ken
Understand, but I have four separate bootnodes, i.e., four different
sys$common:[multinet] areas in one homogeneous cluster.  Other key files
like sysuaf, queus, proxies, etc reside on a cluster common quorum disk.
Is there a logical that I could direct to such a disk, or simply append
that disk to the multinet_root definition and move the nfs.configuration
file to the common disk.  that way, if I want node specific I can put it
in the specific area, if boot specific in the sys$common area, if cluster
wide put it in the cluster$common area.  For fault tolerant computing one
will have more than one boot node and come across this problem.

Thanks,
Todd Wipke
UCSC
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 19 AUG 92 20:18:20 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:    MANAGER@MHT.MED.HARVARD.EDU
From: MANAGER@MHT.MED.HARVARD.EDU
Subject: ftp file transfer rates
X-Vmsmail-To: SMTP%"info-multinet@tgv.com"
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community


We have at our site several pcs working in conjunction with equipment
from Molecular Dynamics.  These pcs receive images that are 20 to 40
megabytes in size.  We use Vaxes running multinet for some of the analysis
of these images and are looking for fast methods for transferring these
images.  So far we find that pc->vax ftp transfers are enormously slower
than the 256 kb/sec vax->vax file transfer.  In the case of PCNFS, file
transfers from VAX->PC are 8 times faster than transfers from PC->VAX
(130 kb/sec vs. 18 kb/sec).  Rates using NCSA Telnet are more even.  In
addition, we note that using the NCSA FTP client is much slower (41 kb/sec)
than using the NCSA FTP server (100 kb /sec)

Does anyone out there have a better method or can anyone recommend 
a pc/ethernet-card/software combination that will get our images from
the pc to the VAX in anything like the time it takes to get the image from
VAX to VAX?


Please direct replies to:


				manager@rascal.med.harvard.edu

				Matthew Temple
				Department of Genetics / HHMI
				Harvard Medical School
				Boston, MA



X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 12 AUG 92 23:34:52 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Subject:  Re: SMTP from other cluster members
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

> We have only one node here that runs Multinet.  Recently, this node
> was added to a cluster.  Now, since Multinet is only running on this
> one node, mail that is headed for SMTP, but sent from another node on
> the cluster does not make it to the node running Multinet.  Here is
> our scenario:

> vax01 - running Multinet
> vax02 - part of the same cluster as vax01

> While logged into vax02, I need to send mail to a Unix machine; here
> is what happens:

> : vax02: mail
> :
> : MAIL> mail
> : To:     vax01::smtp%"user@unix.machine"
> : %MAIL-E-ERRACTRNS, error activating transport SMTP
> : %LIB-E-ACTIMAGE, error activating image DSA101:[SYS2.SYSCOMMON.][SYSLIB]SMTP\
> : _MAILSHR.EXE;
> : -RMS-E-FNF, file not found


> Because vax01 and vax02 are part of the same cluster, vax02 assumes that
> it can deliver the mail locally.  Since vax02 has no license to run
> Multinet, it bombs.  I could set the MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS logical to have
> mail delivered over DECnet even if the sending and receiving nodes are
> part of the same cluster.  Because this will increase traffic in our
> already saturated DECnet, we do not view it as an option.

    This is the only option.  The mail flag indicates whether or not
your cluster is homogenous; i.e., whether or not the nodes need to go
over DECnet to reach each other.  If you aren't running MultiNet on all
of the nodes, then your cluster isn't homogenous. There is no way to
tell VMSmail that your cluster is "somewhat homogenous".

								Ken

X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 19 AUG 92 08:14:49 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:    PETER@bmc.uu.se (Peter Gad, Computer Dept@BMC, Uppsala)
From: PETER@bmc.uu.se
Subject: cant touch servicesentry
X-Vmsmail-To: IN%"info-multinet@tgv.com"
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

Hi,
	does anyone know how to SELECT or DELETE a service in
	'mul con/serv' if you have happend to give its name
	with quotes around it !?!?!
	ie I gave the command SET SERVICE-NAME "Name" and it
	shows up as "Name" when I give a SHOW command.
	Then doing a SELECT "Name" or SELECT NAME gives a
	'?Does not match switch or keyword - "Name"'

	Any clue, anyone ???

	peter
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
From: jvolpe@ncsa.uiuc.edu (James Volpe)
Subject: Re:  Re: Multinet 3.1 Finger                                             
Originator: jvolpe@mars.ncsa.uiuc.edu
Organization: Dow Chemical
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 12:41:48 GMT


In article <2B201D2718AUG92221111@TGV.COM>, adelman@TGV.COM writes:
|> > The new finger program gives every process in the vaxcluster instead
|> > of the main logins, and it doesn't give idle time etc.  its cute, but
|> > the first time I fingered the vax cluster from a unix node, the delay was
|> > so great I thought the network was down.  Since SHOW USERS/FULL gives the
|> > same information for vms, there isn't much need for this expanded feature
|> > IMHO.  If we want the old finger display can we use the 3.0 image with
|> > version 3.1 of Multinet? or is there a logical that changes FINGER behavior?
|> 
|> $ finger/nocluster
|> 
|> 						    Ken

This works fine if you are logged into the vax, but think about 'finger @vax'
from Unix machine.  I have waited ~10 minutes for this to finish on our cluster.
It would be nice to be able to set this back to 'finger/nocluster' by default.

Jim

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Volpe					jvolpe@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Unix Systems Administrator
Dow Chemical
-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Volpe					jvolpe@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Unix Systems Administrator
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 18 AUG 92 20:10:01 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:     adelman (Kenneth Adelman) @ TGV.COM
From: adelman@TGV.COM
Subject:  Re: NFS VMS client as file server?                                  
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

> We have a group of Ultrix workstations and another vaxclustered group of
> vms workstations.  I am wondering if it is possible for one node in the
> vaxcluster to nfsmount a filestructure that sits on Ultrix machine and then
> because that vaxcluster node is a disk server, serve the file structure to
> the rest of the vaxcluster (local area) without running NFS clients on every
> other node in the vaxcluster.

    No, it isn't.  VAXcluster disk service (MSCP) serves disks at the
raw block level, a level not capable of being emulated by the NFS
Client.  The lowest level available over NFS is the file level.

								Ken
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 19 AUG 92 06:14:23 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: "W. Todd Wipke" <wipke@SECS.UCSC.EDU>
From: "W. Todd Wipke" <wipke@SECS.UCSC.EDU>
Subject: Installation Verification Procedure Suggestion                  
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

A suggestion to assist new users.  Have a command file set up a directory
for NFS sharing to illustrate the various aspects of security with uid,gid
etc.  I am having difficulty getting NFS to recognize the file owner, it
seems to only be giving world access, even with defined group and either
specific uid,gid for that group or with passwd file from the unix system
for that group.  Is there a way to see what uid,gid,group, etc are being
assumed at various stages of access in client and server?

Also, why does the owner field show up as [default] instead of showing 
the name of the owner when one does a dir/security?  Even with the client
and server on the same machine I have the same problems.  How can one
find where the problem lies?

Todd Wipke
Molecular Engineering Laboratory
UCSC
wipke@secs.ucsc.edu
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 17 AUG 92 20:03:50 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: cvm@NAUVAX.UCC.NAU.EDU (Chris Michels)
From: cvm@NAUVAX.UCC.NAU.EDU
Subject: RE:  TN3270 "feature"
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

>>     I knew I went to TGV MULTINET for a reason; because it was good. 
>>It is in fact so good that I now have a small unexpected problem with
>>tn3270 connections. 
>>
>>     Seems I now can get full screen mode which I didn't have access to 
>>with TWG.  Great.  Now my users have full screen editing etc with their 
>>connections to Big Blue.  The problem is with multi-page output.  We see 
>>a "holding" message at the end of a screen and don't know what to type 
>>to get the next screen.  I probably should ask an IBM person but I don't 
>>know any.
>
>I believe that what the user needs is the PA1 key.  Which for a VT100 class
>terminal (or VT200, 300, 400) would be ^P1 (Control-P followed by a 1) or
><ESC><PF1> (Escape followed by a PF1).  The key sequences are defined in
>MULTINET:MAP3270.DAT.
>
>Regards,
>-----Stuart

I use the clear key (control-Z) to get the next screen when I have the
holding message.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Michels -- Systems Programmer             cvm@nauvax.ucc.nau.edu
Northern Arizona University -- Flagstaff, AZ    cvm@nauvax.bitnet
Phone: (602) 523-6495

X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
Date: 13 AUG 92 19:40:40 GMT
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From:    GAVRON@VESTA.SUNQUEST.COM (Ehud Gavron)
From: GAVRON@VESTA.SUNQUEST.COM
Subject: RE: SMTP from other cluster members
X-Vmsmail-To: RABINOWITZ@BEAR.COM,INFO-MULTINET@TGV.COM
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community

Date sent:  13-AUG-1992 10:59:35 


>> > We have only one node here that runs Multinet.  Recently, this node
>> > : MAIL> mail
>> > : To:     vax01::smtp%"user@unix.machine"
>
>>     This is the only option.  The mail flag indicates whether or not


	$ define/system/exec mail$Protocol_smtp "%vax01::""27="""

>I beg to differ, Ken, but there is a way to do it.  If you specify the
>to address as __vax01::smtp%"user@unix.machine" (note the TWO
>underscores), it will force the mail to be sent to vax01, even in an
>otherwise homogenous cluster.

	So will the logical name above, making SMTP%"..." forward
	to VAX01.

>It isn't elegant, but it is simple and it works.
>
>Ari
>
>
>Ari Rabinowitz                  rabinowitz@bear.com for VMS and personal mail
>WorkStation Administrator	ari@bear.com for sun/HP Un*x mail
>Bear Stearns


	Ehud

--
Ehud Gavron        (EG76)     
gavron@vesta.sunquest.com
"The world bores you when you're cool."
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
From: gwlester@cpu.com (Gerald W. Lester)
Subject: RE: SMTP from other cluster members
Organization: Computerized Processes Unlimited, Metairie, LA, (504)-889-2784
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 13:49:19 GMT
Reply-To: gwlester@cpu.com

In article <2380E13312AUG92233501@TGV.COM>, "David J. Knapke 317/283-9420" <KNAPKE%BUTLERU.bitnet@UICVM.UIC.EDU> writes:
>
>>    This is the only option.  The mail flag indicates whether or not
>>your cluster is homogenous; i.e., whether or not the nodes need to go
>>over DECnet to reach each other.  If you aren't running MultiNet on all
>>of the nodes, then your cluster isn't homogenous. There is no way to
>>tell VMSmail that your cluster is "somewhat homogenous".
>>
>
>I would agree that there is no good option without spending money.
>The two spending money ways are buy multiple copies of MultiNet or
>buy PMDF, a mail handler.
>
	He could use MX, it does not cost anything.
From: wipke@SECS.UCSC.EDU (W. Todd Wipke)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
Subject: vaxcluster sharing of Multinet configurations
Date: 19 Aug 92 10:15:19 GMT
Article-I.D.: SECS.0095F4E5.B0DDC5E0.21456
Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
X-RFC822-From: "W. Todd Wipke" <wipke@SECS.UCSC.EDU>

What is the recommended procedure if one wants to make a vaxcluster
have identical MU configs for NFS on all nodes (for example by pointing
to the same definition file for nfs-group and uid,gid etc)?
Todd Wipke
UCSC
X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET