HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sikorski@oj.miami.edu (Richard Sikorski)
Subject: uta Jazz @ mia Heat- 23dec
Followup-To: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Organization: University of Miami, RSMAS
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 21:54:27 GMT

[I'm so tired of being behind, that I'm grabbing just a short
headline and mini-boxscore from the paper. I'll post more
detail later...]

Utah Jazz at Miami Heat - 23 Dec 92

(uta)Karl Malone led pts and rbs, and Krystowiak scored 10 of
his 12 pts in Q4 as the Jazz defeated Miami 92-86.
   Utah led 84-78 with 4:27 left in Q4, but Miami climbed
within 88-86 with a (mia)Rice 3fg at 1:09, before the Jazz
then scored the final 4 pts.
   Utah's bench outscored Miami's 32-15.  All five Miami
starters reached double figures. Miami now stands at 3-14.

UTAH JAZZ
           min fga-m fta-m pts
Corbin      36  4 10  2  2 10
K.Malone    37 10 21  2  3 23, 16rbs, 6 tos, 3 blocks
Eaton       12  2  2  0  0  4
J.Malone    35  7 11  1  2 15
Stockton    32  3 11  1  2  8, 10 assists
Humphries   29  0  5  2  2  2
Brown       25  5 10  3  3 13
Krystkowiak 22  3  5  6  6 12
Benoit      12  1  3  2  2  5
               fga-m 3fga-m fta-m or-tr  a pf s to b pts
Totals         35 78   3  5 19 22 13 49 29 20 6 17 7 92
7 team rebounds

MIAMI HEAT
           min fga-m fta-m pts
Long        39  3  8  4  6 10, 11rbs
Rice        37  8 21  0  0 18, 2-6 3fgs
Seikaly     39  6 16  4  4 16, 10rbs
Coles       38  3  8  6  6 13,  6 assists
Edwards     33  7 16  0  0 14,  5 steals
Shaw        10  1  2  0  0  2
Salley      18  1  3  2  2  4
Burton       7  0  3  0  0  0
Miner       19  4 10  1  3  9
               fga-m 3fga-m fta-m or-tr  a pf s to b pts
Totals         33 87   3 10 17 21 18 44 18 22 9 11 6 86
4 team rebounds

Utah  24 19 25 24 -92
Miami 22 24 20 20 -86

--
Richard Sikorski     sikorski@oj.miami.edu
                   r.sikorski@rsmas.miami.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: hymie@fff.chem.utah.edu (James Kleimeyer)
Subject: Re: Ruland's back (Was Re: BOXSCORE det27orl25.02jan93)
Organization: University of Utah Computer Center
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 93 00:07:44 GMT

In article <C0H0J3.AGH@news.cso.uiuc.edu> krust@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Kelly  
Rust) writes:
> 
> Has anyone noticed that the new Ruland is the first NBAer with 
> demonstrably NO vertical?

If you mean vertical leaping ability, I'd say Eaton's is even worse.  Then  
again, he's paid to just stand there.

--
James Kleimeyer
FFF Research Center, Dept. of Chemistry
University of Utah    SLC, UT 84112
(801) 581-7168   hymie@fff.chem.utah.edu  (NeXT Mail)
From: rodmur@ecst.csuchico.edu (Dale Harris)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: The Wizard's minutes?
Date: 4 Jan 93 23:42:05 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico
NNTP-Posting-Host: hairball.ecst.csuchico.edu

In article <C03FJ4.Ep5@inews.Intel.COM> mruanto@frx784.intel.com (Mark Ruanto - EPG  ~) writes:
>In article <7702@dove.nist.gov> hira@cme.nist.gov writes:
>>Anyone out in King land know why the Wizard, Walt Williams, has been 
>>getting such little PT? I thought that he started out real strong and
>>got lotsa mins, but lately it seems like he gets under <20. Its not
>>like the Kings are winning a whole heck of a lot or anything either.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Ron
>
>He hit the rookie wall early, considering he missed most of training camp.
>He did score 20 points against the Mavericks, in a tremendous blowout (sorry
>Dallas fans).
>

I don't know why Walt isn't getting much playing time, but I imagine is
probably going to get more, once it had the previous pts., mentioned above
and once he got 40 pts.,  to lead all scorers in the blow out versus
Philly.  ;)  (yeah, Kings)  Just mabey, just mabey they can make it back
to .500 ball.


-- 
   __        _                     Dale A. Harris  {rodmur@ecst.csuchico.edu} 
  /  )      //                           /   "Is gone... he left for Mexico to
 /  / __.  // _      , , , __.  _       /_  _  __  _  get a job, due to the
/__/_(_/|_</_</_    (_(_/_(_/|_/_)_    / /_</_/ (_</_ deterioting US economy ;)
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Sunday, 10 Jan 1993 12:45:38 MST
From: <ICJPS@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: KJ

KJ's current injury is minor..."they" say he should be playing Tuesday
against the Sonics.

I think his problems this year are just cumulative...I think this must be
his 5th or 6th hamstring pull.  He always gets hammered, so this will
probably continue.  Possibly a blessing in disguise, as it has forced the Suns
to develop other point guard options.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU (Terry Wong)
Subject: Re: Manute Bol
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 23:32:40 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.162222.1530@cis.uab.edu>, beegle@ftp.phy.uab.edu (BadSpeller!) writes:
|> In article <1993Jan5.013920.18889@leland.Stanford.EDU> terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU (Terry Wong) writes:

|> >
|> >Actually, it has been rumored around here for a few weeks that Don Nelson
|> >was interested in reacquiring Bol for the Warriors.  Nelson is a big
|> >fan of Bol's game, and Bol would certainly be the shot-blocking
|> >presence the Warriors need.  The biggest obstacle is the salary cap.
|> >Bol's salary is over a $1 million and the Warriors are about $1.5 million
|> >over the cap.  To acquire Bol, Philadelphia would have to accept in
|> >exchange a player making at least what Bol is making.  Alton Lister
|> >would be perfect, but it is doubtful that the Sixers would take Lister,
|> >and the Warriors don't want to give up anyone else making that kind
|> >of salary.
|> >
|> >					terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU
|> 
|> I would not be against this trade if the sixers got some first rounders
|> in there. Lister is almost done as a player and the only reason the 
|> 76ers would take him is the salary cap provisions. If the Warriors are willing
|> to part with a 1 in addition to lister I would take this in a hart beat.
|> 

Dream on!  The Warriors would never give up a #1 pick to the Sixers for
Bol.  Don Nelson thinks he snookered the Sixers in the first place by getting
the Sixers No. 1 pick in 1991 for Bol.  This pick was used to select
Victor Alexander.  The Warriors are only interested in Bol if they can
get him for next to nothing, and they figured the Sixers might be interested
since Bol is mostly sitting on the bench and eating up over $1 million of
the salary cap.  The big problem is that the Warriors have no room under
their own cap.

					terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: byau@jarthur.claremont.edu (Ben Yau)
Subject: Re: Doug Christie
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 07:17:06 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.044907.24280@leland.Stanford.EDU> terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU (Terry Wong) writes:
>
>This is a consideration, because Seattle is not very deep in terms of big men.
>Other than Kemp, Cage, and Benjamin, they don't have any physical players.
>Benjamin was really a non-factor against Golden State since he played
>less than 5 minutes.
>
>					terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU

the interesting thing about Kemp is that I don't think he is taht
physical a player.  Sophmore year when I saw him for the first time
(i mean his sophomore year), i was surprised because it looked like 
he shrank!! last year (his third year), he looked like he had regained 
some of the width of his shoulders.

I think Cage and Benjamin are the most phyuiscal.  I don't think Kemp
is that phyiscal.  He seems to be physical when he can taste the dunk.
Otherwise, He'll try to do spin moves and take fade-away jumpers and
hooks. Although a lot of big men do this, they also work with their
strength to get steps closer to the basket.  I do not see Kemp diong
this to much unless he is already really close to the basket where 
he wouldn't really need to get physical to make the next step
to make the dunk.

If you read ..lesee.. i think it is INSIDE SPORTS magazine, which
btw, has a really good article about the NBA's good ol days and why
today's NBA is no match at all, anyway, if you read INSIDE SPORTS
there is an article where Horace Grant rates to forwards in the NBA.
First, he did not list L.Johnson which surprised me.  And he listed
Kemp at around #11 i think (after Derrick Coleman , though, I 
remember that..  ).. anyway, Grant said that Kemp has a bright future,
but needs more experience, explaining that it is probably due to Kemp
not playing college ball.

He is also says that Kemp is not a very physical player so it is easy
to guard Kemp.

When I watch him play , (kemp) I have to agree.  He is not as physical
as I thought he would be for his size..
From: alan@sierra.unr.edu (Alan McKay)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Not Re: Doug Christie
Date: 11 Jan 93 16:47:30 GMT
Reply-To: alan@wrc.unr.edu (Alan McKay)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Desert Research Institute, University of Nevada

In article <1993Jan8.231913.3954@muddcs.claremont.edu> byau@jarthur.claremont.edu (Ben Yau) writes:


[A bunch of stuff, having ~nothing~ to do with Doug Christie, deleted]

Hey, how 'bout changing the subject line once in awhile in these stream
of conciousness threads? That's what an editor is for. Try, for example,
Subject: Ricky Pierce (was Re: Doug Christie)



...al
w.a. mckay
desert research institute
reno, nevada
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Re: I BEE-LEEVE!  Nellie is a JEE-NYOUS!
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 18:16:52 GMT

rmjr@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com (Rich Maxwell) writes:
>Jim Oliver writes:
>> This was absurd.  Nelson got to dictate [...]
>
>Looks like the Celtics fans are getting tired of whining about their
>own woes...


Good God Almighty!  He called Jim a Celtics fan!  May lightning
strike me right this moment!

	* * *

Now back to the business of vilifying Big Nellie:

>I do believe Nellie is one of the premier head coaches in 
>the NBA [...]
>However, his larger successes have been as the Warriors G.M.

Yeah, right.  Let me repeat once again, slowly, for the Warriors
fans who read too much Glen Dickey -- 

The year before Nelson joined the Warriors, George Karl led the
Warriors, with Joe Barry and Sleepy and fat-drunk Mullin, to an upset
of Utah in the first round of the playoffs, and a 1-4 exit against the
Lakers in the next round.

Since then, with all his hoopla and genius and crafty drafts, Nelson
has NOT gone any further than that in the playoffs.  You hear me?
Not one step further!

1988 - drafts Tellis Frank, trades for Sampson, fires Karl, no playoff.
1989 - upset Utah 3-2, lose 1-4 to Phoenix.
1990 - let Larry Smith go, trades for Lister, no playoff.
1991 - upset the Spurs 3-1, lose 1-4 to the Lakers.
1992 - 55-27 regular season, lose 1-3 to Seattle.

So I know what you all say: The team is more exciting, they sell out,
you love the personnel and they make you feel all warm and fuzzy.
Great.  So Nelson is a P.R. genius and a mass-hypnotist who convinced
10 million Bay Area resiednts to follow him blindly.  But he is NOT
a basketball genius, because HE DOESN'T DELIVER PLAYOFF WINS.  Just hype.


--Gidi

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: jemartin@nyx.cs.du.edu (John Martin)
Subject: Re: FTs again (was Re: Paxson sucks (was Re: Phoenix is absolutely scary...))
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 18:44:03 GMT

In article <1993Jan11.000648.25214@cheshire.oxy.edu> tamada@cheshire.oxy.edu (Michael K. Tamada) writes:
>In article <C0MIEG.IAF@NeoSoft.com> claird@NeoSoft.com (Cameron Laird) writes:
>>Notice, everyone, what a BIG improvement that is in
>>FT%; 'fact, I can't think of anyone else (apart from
>>the usual obvious statistical outliers) who has done
>>so well.  Anyone know what the story is?  This stuff
>
>...
>
>     Well the best known example is the Mailman:  Karl Malone was 
>195-405 in free throws for 48.1% his rookie season.  Last year he
>was 673-865 for 77.8%.
>[...]

Pardon the obvious FAQ from a new reader, but does anyone know what it is
that Malone says at the line? (and has he gone through this routine
throughout his career? If so, it certainly has worked!)  I've read that he
won't tell anyone, but was curious if there are any lipreaders out
there... :)

John

(About the Sonics all-star picks:  I would love to see Gary Payton chosen,
but I really couldn't pick any of the Sonics as an all-star this year. 
That is what is so great about this year's team: they're #2 in the league,
yet have no outstanding superstar players in their own right, just a bunch a
guys who can get the job done (and a coach who can hand out those job
assignments)  <==>  outstanding depth.)

Tues. night: Phoenix at Seattle

--
 John E. Martin    jemartin@nyx.cs.du.edu      University of Puget Sound '92
    Kent, WA     (formerly martin@ups.edu)   SeinfeldSuperSonicsBC++RushDWeckl
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: dewey@ccs.northeastern.edu (Dwight S Flewelling)
Subject: Re: IN MEMORIAM: Johnny Most
Organization: College of CS, Northeastern U
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 14:10:24 GMT

Sorry to beat a dead horse but in my last post I madse a slight error and wanted 
to correct the error before someone flamed me.

originally Johnny most had used the names McNasty and McDirty, they were late
changed (by someone else) to McNasty and McFilthy.
'
That's what I get for sticking my nose into other people's arguments :)

-Dewey

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: MLINDROOS@FINABO.ABO.FI (Marcus Lindroos INF)
Subject: Re: Jordan & Pippen: No Olympics
Organization: Abo Akademi University, Finland
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 20:55:28 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

In <1993Jan2.183905.22101@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> u_nique@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu writes:

> In article <1992Dec30.221708.21896@ll.mit.edu> nates@ll.mit.edu ( Nate Smith) writes:
> >pretty deep to find the cause of the Chicago flatness to me.
> >
> >on another note, here's a vote for No Repeat Appearances by any NBA
> >player.  there are plenty of players to form "dream" teams from. ( i'd
> >make an exception for Sir Charles, though :-).  then mikey and scotty
> >dont have to "agonize" over whether they should go again - they wont
> >be allowed to.  somehow i dont think magic & bird would mind this rule
> >either.
> 
> This is true.  Any other Dream Teamers suffering from the extra summer of
> "play?" (when you romp by 50 in every game and play 20 minutes...)  Barkley,
> Malone, Robinson, Laettner, Mullin, Stockton (who got injured) are all doing
> just fine.  Patrick Ewing is a bit off, and Drexler had knee surgery.  Huh,
> it doesn't seem like Jordan and Pippen have an excuse.

I was waiting for this sort of thing to reappear. Don't forget that Russell &
co. annihilated the opposition back in Melbourne in 1956, yet the amateurs lost
to the Soviets sixteen years later. Sure, the 1996 Olympic basketball
tournament will be rather one-sided but I expect the best European & Latin
American teams to perform far better than they did in Barcelona. The only way
to go is up.
---
But I agree that playing for the "Dream Team" should be a once-a-lifetime
honor. No need to risk Jordan & co. - they will be well in their 30s then and
consequently more susceptible to injuries and/or fatigue after the long NBA 
regular
season/playoffs grind. Who "deserve" to play on the 1996 team after being turned
down in 1992? Off the top of my head: Mark Price, Tim Hardaway, Joe Dumars,
Isiah Thomas [if Larry Bird was god enough, why not Thomas in '96?], Kevinn
Johnson, Shaq... Anyone else?
 
MARCU$
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: jtg@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (joel.t.glomski)
Subject: Re: Suns file protest in San Antonio loss
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 18:08:09 GMT

In article <93006.140938U47526@uicvm.uic.edu> David E. Thomas <U47526@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:
|In article <1993Jan6.181643.16051@ennews.eas.asu.edu>,
|koehnema@enuxhb.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann) says:
|>
|>In article <OLIVER.93Jan5201512@coate.mit.edu> oliver@athena.mit.edu (James D.
|>Oliver III) writes:
|
|>>If the protest is upheld, it will be the second such in NBA history.  The
|>>first one was about nine years ago, also at the HemisFair, in a game
|>>against the Lakers.
|>
|>I think there have been more as well - one in the East involving CHicago.
|>ANyone know circumstances surrounding either of these?
|>
|
|The one with Chicago that you are probably thinking of was in a game a few
|years back against the Knicks.  As I recall the Knicks were inbounding with
|one tenth of a second left in the game and they were two points down.  They
|got the ball in and hit a three pointer before the buzzer.  (I think it was
|Trent Tucker now with the Bulls who hit it).
|
|The Bulls filed a protest saying that if the timekeeping was accurate there
|was no way they could have gotten the shot off in time. (The videotape
|certainly seemed to confirm this).
|
|The protest was not upheld, but the NBA as much as admitted that the Bulls
|were correct since they adopted the current 'three tenths of a second' rule
|as a response.
|
|
|David E. Thomas
|University of Illinois at Chicago
|
There was another game many years back (the Sloan-Van Lier era) where
the Bulls protested a loss to I believe it was Detriot. The Bulls trailed
by two with a few seconds left. At that time, they had an old style clock
which had "hands" i.e. no digits, so it was impossible to tell exactly
how much time was on the clock. The ball was passed to Tom Boerwinkle (sp?)
who hit a turn-around jumper but it was waved off by the referee who claimed
that the buzzer had sounded and the Pistons had won. The refs then ran
into the locker room to avoid the protests from the Bulls. A few minutes
later the Bulls coach (Dick Motta?) walked over to the scorers table
and had the scorer push the button to start the clock. After a second or
two the horn sounded.

Tapes were sent to the league office and the league ruled that they game
was indeed tied and it was picked up from that spot before the next
Chicago-Detroit game. BTW, the Bulls still lost the protested game
in overtime.

Joel


Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: wgr@rti.rti.org
Subject: Re: A Couple of Questions
Organization: Research Triangle Institute, RTP, NC
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 17:34:53 GMT

In article <1993Jan11.143101.12522@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>>> 2) When a player misses a shot and is called for a charge, is it a FGA.
>>
>>No, but it is a turnover.
>
>Actually, it depends on whether the ball left his hands or not.  If he shot
>the ball and THEN charged, it is a FGA, otherwise not...

Are you sure about this, Dave?  The NBA doesn't allow a made basket on
an offensive foul, regardless of whether the ball has left the shooter's
hand when the foul occurs (unlike the NCAA rule).  It seems like that
should mean that the offensive foul negates the shot attempt in any case.
From: nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re : IN MEMORIAM : Johny Most
Date: 5 Jan 93 14:15:16 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: HMS

In article <1ia165INNfv0@news.aero.org> robert@aero.org (R. S. Statsinger) writes:
>
>One thing I must say though is that it seemed - and I've heard - that Most 
>would very often dis the Smelltic's opposition. In '85, the year
>of the Magic Johnson mini-skyhook, NBC (or whichever network was covering)
>contrasted Hearn and Most by showing clips of Hearn's coverage of a brilliant
>play by the Smelltics, and Most's coverage of Magic's miniskyhook with 2 seconds
>left. Hearn went on and on about some great play that Bird made in his (Hearn's)
>inimitable ebullient style, while Most's coverage of Magic's hook sounded like
>Most had just been forced to drink castor oil.


That was in 1987,you big dink. The network was CBS. Seems like you've
been drinking too much of something lately. Also,when Chick Heran was
being inducted into the Hall of Fame,in his acceptance speech he said
that Johny should have been inducted before him...
 
>Notwithstanding this difference in broadcasting style, I definitely feel
>for all you Smelltic fans - I know how I'd be feeling right now if it were 
>Chick who had died.
>
>				R.S.

From the attention-seeking-no-knowledge-of-the-game-I-want-to-be-in-every
-post-on-the-net fuck-up like you,I guess it must be taken as an
expression of sympathy.

-Mark
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: stubaker@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Stuart Baker)
Subject: Re: Bill Cartwright
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 00:30:24 GMT


Besides the swap for Oakley the Knicks and Bulls swapped draft choices
allowing the Knicks to draft Rod Strickland and the Bulls to draft Will
From: Tom Wright
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: TEST
Date: 6 Jan 93 23:40:57 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.basketball.pro

Excuse the test...just trying to see if I can post from my site...

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU (Terry Wong)
Subject: Re: Manute Bol
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 01:39:20 GMT

In article <1993Jan4.133040.3121@peanut>, niceswangern@bvc.edu writes:


|> > But it is with great uphoria (I had to try to spell this, am I close?)
|> > that I report that the sixers finally have a dominating center. NUTE!!!
|> > 
|> Funny you mentioned this.  When Philly played at Chicago last month, I 
|> watched the game on WGN.  On the pre-game show the mega-prejudiced Bulls 
|> announcers were talking about how the game should be a cakewalk for the 
|> Bulls, as well as the fact that Manute Bol was in the lineup for "comic 
|> relief".  The only credit they gave to the Sixers was to Hornacek and 
|> Hawkins - not for their supreme talent, but because they're originally from 
|> Illinois.  Boy was I glad when Philly won the game!
|> 
|> Getting back to Manute, that was one of the first games where he actually 
|> got some playing time.  He played some great defense, and since that time 
|> has become a strong rebounder/shot blocker and even scores once in awhile.  
|> I don't see him leading the 76ers to a 50-win season next year, but he is 
|> certainly underrated.
|> 
|> > 15 Rebounds the other night. He actually scored in on of the other games,
|> > and yes he did get an assist! 
|> > 

Actually, it has been rumored around here for a few weeks that Don Nelson
was interested in reacquiring Bol for the Warriors.  Nelson is a big
fan of Bol's game, and Bol would certainly be the shot-blocking
presence the Warriors need.  The biggest obstacle is the salary cap.
Bol's salary is over a $1 million and the Warriors are about $1.5 million
over the cap.  To acquire Bol, Philadelphia would have to accept in
exchange a player making at least what Bol is making.  Alton Lister
would be perfect, but it is doubtful that the Sixers would take Lister,
and the Warriors don't want to give up anyone else making that kind
of salary.

					terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU
From: rlcarr@animato.network23.com (Rich Carreiro)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: QUESTION: 1st NBA 3pt shot?
Distribution: world
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 1.16f (10.17.92) by Mike Schwartz & Michael B. Smith
Date: 5 Jan 93 23:18:59 EST
Organization: The Other Side of Life

In article <RPM.93Jan4081616@bach.wag.caltech.edu> rpm@bach.wag.caltech.edu (Richard P. Muller) writes:
> 
> Trivia Question for all of the NBA Trivia Genii on the net...
> 
> Who hit the NBA's first 3 point shot?

The Celtics' Chris Ford.

-- 
Rich Carreiro                                  Home: (401)841-8514
rlcarr@animato.network23.com
uunet.uu.net!animato!rlcarr