HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel)
Subject: Re: Bernoulli
Organization: DAFCO: OS/2 Software Support & Consulting
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 23:52:40 GMT

joneswd@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (William D. Jones) writes:

>Is there anyone out there who owns a Bernoulli removable hard drive  
>set-up?  I am planning on purchasing one in the future (hopefully) and was  
>wondering if anyone had any experience with one.  I plan on using it as a  
>hard drive, not as a mass storage device.
I've been using them for 6 years. You'll be happy with it. Hard drives
international is selling a 90 meg drive with 2 cartridges for $400 - a
real good deal. I recommend getting the Bernoulli adapter for it but
its not necessary - the unit is fully SCSI compatible.
-- 
Dave Feustel N9MYI <feustel@netcom.com>
 
[.sig on vacation]
Newsgroups: comp.periphs,comp.sys.sgi,comp.sys.sun.hardware
From: oliver@earthview.cms.udel.edu (Oliver Weatherbee)
Subject: Portacom Graphics Accelerator
Organization: Marine Studies, University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 16:32:39 GMT

Is anyone familiar with the Portacom Eclipse II graphics accelerator
board? It was mentioned in PC Computing's top picks for accelerator
boards but I have found no reference to it in any of the Computer
Shopper issues I've looked at.

Thanks,

	O

Newsgroups: comp.periphs,misc.forsale.computers,misc.wanted
From: ssclift@neumann.uwaterloo.ca (Simon Clift)
Subject: WANTED: Varian V77 Hawk Moving Arm Disk Controller Assembly
Keywords: varian, disk, disc, controller, wanted
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 13:03:54 GMT

I'm posting this for a former colleague, please don't reply to this e-mail
address, but to the phone number below.  Yes, I said Varian, it's for a
nuclear training centre control room simulator built many years ago...

--------------------

WANTED:  A Varian V77 "Hawk" Moving Arm Disk Controller Assembly

	 P/L: 44P0802-000 Rev. C    <-  I'm told these numbers might
	 W/L: 95W1277     Rev. C    <-  be useful in identifying the
       Logic: 91C0590     Rev. B    <-  part.

Reply to:

     Arun Misra
     Western Nuclear Training Center
     Ontario Hydro Bruce Nuclear Power Development
     Tiverton, Ontario, N0G 2T0

     (519) 361-2673, ask for Arun

--------------------
From: maurices@spock.dis.cccd.edu (Maurice Shihadi)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs
Subject: Need help with grounding problem, I think.
Date: 13 Oct 92 05:46:45 GMT
Organization: Coast Community College District, Costa Mesa, CA

I've got a midi studio set up with a bunch of computers and such.
Anyway, I changed rooms within the same dwelling and I seem to now 
have a horrible ground loop problem when everything is turned on.  
I've narrowed it down to the SE/30, a sound module and a mixer 
all plugged into a power conditioner plugged into the wall.  
Everything is grounded except the mixer which has a two prong plug. 
If I turn the SE/30 off, the problem goes away.  If I leave the
SE/30 on and turn the sound module off, the problem goes away.
However, I cannot have both units on at the same time without 
difficulty.  

I've tried plugging the SE/30 into another wall outlet.  Since it was
on the same circut the problem became worse.

I tried raising the third prong on the SE/30 with an adapter, no
difference same problem.  Does anyone have any oppinions short of
running a line to a water pipe.

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

maurices
Xref: sparky comp.periphs:1396 comp.periphs.printers:2981 comp.sys.mac.hardware:19115 comp.misc:4033
From: rsl30@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: comp.periphs,comp.periphs.printers,comp.sys.mac.hardware,comp.misc
Subject: HELP: IBM PC/MAC LaserWriter Cable
Date: 16 Oct 92 00:54:04 CDT
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

I'd like to connect an IBM-clone PC to a MAC LaserWriter II NT.
I checked a few stores and nobody seems to have the cable.
Does anybody know where I can get such a cable?
Do I have to special order it?
What is such a cable called (technically)?

Please reply by e-mail.

Thanks.
Merzad
Newsgroups: comp.periphs
Newsgroups: comp.periphs
Subject: panasonic laser
From: lou@netlink.cts.com (Louis Puccio)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 03:57:01 PDT
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA

HI!!! Can anyone send me any info about the Panasonic kxp4410 laser 
printer? What do you like or dislike about it? What do you think of the 
quality and value?
please email all answers to me.
thanks!!!!!!!!!!

louis

--                    
INTERNET:  lou@netlink.cts.com (Louis)
UUCP:   ...!nosc!ryptyde!netlink!lou
NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs
Subject: Re: Bernoulli
Date: 15 Oct 92 17:41:08 GMT
Article-I.D.: mksol.1992Oct15.174108.24311
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc

In <1bipbaINNcs@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu> joneswd@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (William D. Jones) writes:

>Is there anyone out there who owns a Bernoulli removable hard drive  
>set-up?  I am planning on purchasing one in the future (hopefully) and was  
>wondering if anyone had any experience with one.  I plan on using it as a  
>hard drive, not as a mass storage device.

I've got a 44MB Portable that I've been pretty happy with.  Bernoulli
now makes a 90MB setup (but not in the Portable, for some strange
reason).  There are a number of 'removable hard drive' vendors
(Bernoulli isn't really a hard drive -- it's a proprietary
technology).  I can't speak to the others, but I've been more than
happy with the quality of the product (5 year warranty on media, for
example) and the support (which I only needed to call once, to ask a
question -- the equipment itself has been flawless).

The one big drawback to Bernoulli is that they are somewhat more
expensive than other removable alternatives, from the prices that I've
seen. 

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
Xref: sparky comp.periphs:1389 comp.sources.wanted:4673 alt.sources.wanted:1620 comp.misc:4003 comp.periphs.scsi:4986
From: news@mgse.UUCP (News Administator)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs,comp.sources.wanted,alt.sources.wanted,comp.misc,comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: SCSI archive files
Date: 15 Oct 92 05:00:01 GMT
Followup-To: comp.periphs
Distribution: world
Organization: mgse


Last Changed:	Thu Sep 24 23:31:09 CDT 1992 (New BBS Phone number)

This is a periodic posting of information about some of the archives at
ftp.cs.tulane.edu and the available files from the SCSI-BBS, including
SCSI, ESDI, IPI, and Fiber Channel documents from the standards committees.

These files are available for FTP from ftp.cs.tulane.edu in the directory
pub/scsi. Files are stored in file areas as they are found in the BBS with
each area having a file named 'files.bbs' that tells what each file is. The
file pub/scsi/index.Z list each file area, it's descriptions and it's files.

Thanks to John Lohmeyer of NCR, a majority of the SCSI related files from the
SCSI BBS are now available for anonymous ftp. These files were sent to me by
Mr. Lohmeyer at his expense so that more people would have access to them.
The SCSI BBS (719-574-0424) contains a large amount of data relating to SCSI,
and ESDI as well as SCSI-2, IPI, and Fiber Channel, as well as the last
revision of the SCSI-1 standard before it went to publication by ANSI.

Most of the files in the SCSI archive are either archived with the ZIP utility
or compressed with the 'compress' program. Most of the text files are stored
as Wordstar word processing files. PKzip for PC/MS-DOS is included in the 
archive to allow users to break up the .ZIP files, and the PC/MS-DOS binaries
and .C source are also in the archive to convert the Wordstar documents to
ASCII text.

---
Mark Seiffert,  Metairie, LA.
uucp:           rex.cs.tulane.edu!mgse!marks or rex!mgse!marks
bitnet:         marks%mgse@REX.CS.TULANE.EDU
internet:       marks%mgse@rex.cs.tulane.edu or marks@mgse.UUCP

Newsgroups: comp.periphs
From: lam@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu (Ken Lam)
Subject: Help Identify this Tape drive..PLEASE!
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 17:16:38 GMT

I've got a tape drive that I'm looking at called CIPHER.
Its partnum: PN160100-003
             Option B
Density 1600 BPI
Model # F880640-90-1025
Speed 100/25 IPS

I'm pretty sure this is a 9 track(by size and arrangement).

Can anyone tell me what sort of computer will work with it or maybe
`what sort of interface it has?  

This is of course used and I need to know a price which I should 
think to offer...

Thanks..Ken


--
Ken Lam                                                     (803)-884-7615 (H)
System Administrator--JOVE Project @ NASA                   (803)-792-4969 (W)
Senior Systems Consultant--Integrated Technical Systems     (803)-792-5446(FAX)
Network Support--Dept of Biometry @ Medical Univ. of S.C.   lam@jove.cofc.edu
LAN Administrator--Dept of Biology/Geology @ CofCharleston  lam@sparky.musc.edu
From: joneswd@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (William D. Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs
Subject: Bernoulli
Date: 15 Oct 1992 03:42:34 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department at Rose-Hulman
Reply-To: joneswd@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (William D. Jones)
NNTP-Posting-Host: o231-11.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu

Is there anyone out there who owns a Bernoulli removable hard drive  
set-up?  I am planning on purchasing one in the future (hopefully) and was  
wondering if anyone had any experience with one.  I plan on using it as a  
hard drive, not as a mass storage device.
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: goykhman_a@apollo.hp.com (Alex Goykhman)
Subject: Re: SCSI Arrbitration/Selection on HP-UX
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:28:47 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Chelmsford, MA

In article <16887@pitt.UUCP> batman@mb5000.anes.upmc.edu (William E. Madden Jr.) writes:
>
>According to the SCSI Technical Reference from Hewlett Packard:
>
>"The Fujitsu chip combines arbitration with selection (See SELECT in the
>Fujitsu MB87030 Users' Manual)"

    I was the one who wrote the Domain/OS SCSI driver for the 
    Fujitsu chip, so I must know something about it.

>
>We're attempting to use the SCSI-II protocol used by HP-UX (and thus
>the Fujitsu chip) to talk to a National Semiconductor DP8490 SCSI-II
>controller chip (in target mode) on a Dyna-Five Baby bullet PC board.
>How are the SCSI control lines handled by the Fujitsu during arbitration/
>selection?

    In accordance with the spec.

>
>When we run a SCSI inquiry command on HP-UX, we see the ATTN line go
>high, but not the SELECT line. We trap the interrupt comming from the
>select line to initiate our handler.

    First, you should see an arbitration phase (BSY + HA's SCSI ID).
    Do you?
>
>So, riddle me this, Caped Crusaders,
>If the Fujitsu Chip is combining arbitration and selection into one 
>phase, as is stated in the tech ref, would this possibly prevent the
>SELECT line on the NS chip from ever going high?  If anyone could think
>of another reason the line wouldn't go high, we're intersted in that 
>idea too.  :-)

    Lost arbitration. If you connect a decent analyser (such as HP 
    16550A) to the bus, you'll see it yourself.


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions are mine.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky comp.periphs.scsi:4917 comp.sys.next.sysadmin:5774 comp.sys.next.hardware:2031
From: kls30@cd.amdahl.com (Kent L. Shephard)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.next.sysadmin,comp.sys.next.hardware
Subject: Incomplete transfers on the SCSI bus
Date: 6 Oct 92 19:43:23 GMT
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

I have a Micropolis 1588 - 669MB drive.  I have a problem.
When this drive is sharing the bus I get incomplete transfer error messages.
This also hoses the UNIX file system on the disk during boot.
If the drive is on the bus by itself I don't get any problems.
If the onther device is on the bus alone I don't get any errors.

ANyone have any idea of the problem and/or how to solve it.
This happens no matter what the second device is.  It has happened
with just about every device I've tried.  These devices include a SUN CD-rom,
Quantum LPS-105, and a PLI CD-rom.  THe only device that has been able
to work with the drive has been a Maxtor 200MB hard drive.

BTW - The system is a NeXTcube with 16MB of ram.

-- 
/*  These are only my opinions.  Whose else could/would take credit? */
From: gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM (Gess Shankar)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: ASPI4DOS Problem
Date: 12 Oct 92 13:29:55 GMT
Organization: Knowledge Exchange, GA, US of A

I wonder if scsi experts out there can help me out here. I have an
MSDOS machine (386/25) with Adaptec 1542B, Maxtor XT-4380S and a
Tandberg 3600 Tape drive on the SCSI bus. The tape drive is at the end
and terminated.

ASPI4DOS (v2.1) fails with "Failed scanning for SCSI devices" sometimes
and other times just causes a hang or will proceed and end up with a
devide by 0 error and cause a processor halt. This seems to indicate that
the bus is not terminated properly, but both ends of the bus are terminated.
Short of calling Mr Schwartzenegger for some help, I don't know what
else to do. ;-)

If I remove the Maxtor and plug in a HP 97548SU, everything works as
expected. Does this mean that the problem is with the Maxtor? Are there
jumpers that need to be set? Incidentally I would like to get some info
on the various jumpers on the maxtor XT-4380S. If anyone has them handy,
can you please post or email?

GeSS
--
Gess Shankar      |<><>|Internet: gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM                |<><>|
Knowledge Exchange|<><>|{rutgers,ogicse,gatech}!emory!gwinnett!knex!gess|<><>|
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: eddie@grok49.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM (Eddie Williams)
Subject: Re: Extended message rejection
Organization: /usr/lib/news/organization
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 92 13:07:55 GMT

In article <1bfo8lINNree@falcon.natinst.com> cummings@natinst.com (Rodney Cummings) writes:
>A question regarding SCSI spec interpretation...
>
>If a SCSI-2 target does not implement ANY of the extended messages (such as
>SYNCHRONOUS DATA TRANSFER REQUEST), when should the MESSAGE REJECT
>be sent to the initiator... after the first byte of the extended
>message, or after all bytes of the extended message have been received?
>
>From my reading of the spec (specifically 5.6.14), it seems like the
>first byte should be rejected, but one likes to be certain...
>
>-- 
>     Rodney Cummings            cummings@natinst.com
>     National Instruments       Austin, Texas


I have seen it done both ways but most frequently devices reject the message after
the first byte.  In my opinion a target should send the reject message as soon as it
detects a problem.  That way a driver can determine the exact message that the target
does not like.  However, a driver had better be able to handle it either way.
~
Eddie Williams
Ed.Williams@ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM

Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: sherwood@fenris.space.ualberta.ca (Sherwood Botsford)
Subject: Re: DAT vs. 8mm
Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 19:01:35 GMT

Michael van Elst writes
[Munch]

> >Above capacities are comparing low end exabyte (8200) to  
> >low end DAT.
> 
> Of course, this makes DAT best looking. But high end DAT  
doesn't
> store significantly more than low end DAT. No, data  
compression
> does not count.
> 

I didn't have the figures for the 8500, so I used the low  
end of each species.


With compression our HP stores "up to 8 GB" on a 90 m tape.
Now, if they are using a reasonable mix of files, this  
works out to about 3 GB.  

The streaming speed on this drive is also better than the  
187 I quoted earlier.  "Sustained transfer 366-732 K/sec"
Why the range, I don't know.  That may be using  
compression, and hence the write to tape is constant.   
Perhaps someone from HP would care to comment.
From: mberhan@cup.portal.com (Mike D Berhan)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: SCSI, FastSCSI, SCSI-2: What are the differences?
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 92 22:56:25 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world

dcrocker@cisco.com writes:

>This is interesting since I was never able to figure out why I had so much
>trouble.  I was using it with DOS 5.0 with an Orchid 486-50 Superboard
>(OPTI chipset with local bus video).  The biggest problem I had was the 
>fact that the system wouldn't boot reliably (sometimes hung and had to be 
>powered off; not even reset would work).
>
>I have always suspected that this problem had something to do with the speed 
>of my processor.  It wouldn't be the first time that some software didn't 
>work at 50Mhz. The system seemed to run fine after the aspi driver was loaded.
>Of course, I couldn't load it util I booted.  It wasn't the speed of the bus 
>since I have it set up to run the bus at the standard 8Mhz speed.  Anyone out 
>there have success with a 486-50 system and this board?  By the way, I have 
>not had any problems with anything else in this system besides the adaptec.
>
>What I found out from the experience was that, for whatever reason, Adaptec
>was not in a position to help me figure out what was happening.  I can't
>say that Ultrastor's support is any better, but I know for sure that adaptec 
>was worse than most.
>
>Dan

I'm running a 486/50 with my AHA-1542, no problems whatsoever.  BUT I
previously did have a cheap 386/33 clone that had some similiar problems to
yours.  I came to the conclusion that this motherboard did not handle bus-
master operations properly while running out of slow ROM (e.g. INT 13h ROM).
My friend had the identical 386/33 and he had no problems whatsoever.  Once
ASPI4DOS.SYS is loaded, no more bus-master operations will occur while running
out of slow ROM.  If your motherboard allows shadowing the host adapter
BIOS, you may want to give that a shot.

Mike Berhan
mberhan@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: rrohbeck@kboeng.enet.dec.com (Ralf-Peter Rohbeck)
Subject: Re: SCSI bad sector handling
Reply-To: rrohbeck@kboeng.enet.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Int. GmbH
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 14:51:38 GMT


In article <1992Oct10.133109.19044@steam.rome.ny.us>, strike@steam.rome.ny.us (Strikemaster) writes:
>I have seen an occasional "hung drive"; where the drive access light stays
>on for far longer than I'd expect, given the task.  I was curious if this
>was a sign of the reallocation process, or just this Seagate being true to
>it's family tradition of obnoxious behavior.
If you (or your OS/driver/host adapter) disable error correction in the
read/write error recovery mode page and have set a high retry count, the
drive will retry for what may seem like forever. Of course, the drive's default
mode page settings may also have some effect. This may explain differences
between vendors. Reallocation alone is just an additional write with an
associated seek maybe, so this can't be the time consuming thing.
--
===============================================================================
Ralf-Peter Rohbeck          rrohbeck@kbomfg.dec.com         Product engineering
Digital Equipment Int. GmbH rrohbeck%kbomfg.enet.dec.com       Disk drive plant
Sudetenstrasse 5/POB 1356   ...!decwrl!kbomfg.dec.com!rrohbeck)      Kaufbeuren
W-8950 Kaufbeuren           (+49) 8341 / 91-4473                        Germany
#include "disclaimer.h"
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: aweir@ttd.teradyne.com (Alan Weir)
Subject: Where's C. Wegrzyn or his ASPI DLL?
Organization: Teradyne Inc., Telecommunications Division
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 92 13:17:01 GMT

A couple of weeks ago Chuck Wegrzyn sent a post indicating he had an
ASPI DLL for windows. I've tried to contact him at his EMAIL address
of "wegrzyn@cerf.net" but I keep being told that there's no such 
address. Can anyone can put me in touch with Chuck or EMAIL me the
driver?
	Thanks.
From: brent@lastthor (Brent Terry)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: IBM 8mm Drive
Date: 16 Oct 92 13:13:33 GMT
Organization: Pencom Software

In article <719180731.AA00000@csource.oz.au>  
Dan.Griffin@f215.n670.z3.fidonet.org (Dan Griffin) writes:
> Can anyone help with some info on IBM's 8mm 2.3G SCSI tape drive for  
PCs?
>  
> Who makes the drive for IBM?
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All 8mm Drives are made by Exabyte. The difference is that Exabyte puts
some extra things into the microcode for IBM to do extra things, like
showing the drive is ready when a tape is in the process of loading.
--
==============================================
Brent Terry            email: brent@pencom.com
                       voice: 512-343-1111
==============================================
From: terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: TK50 & Adaptec 1542B?
Date: 9 Oct 92 04:22:05 GMT
Organization: St. Peter's College, US

In article <GHENNIGA.92Oct7220611@ampere.ampere>, ghenniga@NMSU.Edu writes:
> 	Is there any way to run a DEC TK50 SCSI tape drive on a PC equipped
> with an Adaptec 1542B? I'm running OS/2 2.0 and have a serious need to do
> a backup but with no money I thought I could borrow one of our old TK50's
> from the University! Good idea but will it work???

  TK50's aren't SCSI. They're a funky dual-serial bus. There is a TK50Z,
which has an external funk-to-SCSI adapter. There are two versions of the
PROMs for this adapter - one for use with the MicroVAX 2000 (which is best
described as "a not completely unsuccessful attempt at SCSI") and another
for use with the MicroVAX 3100 family. The latter should work.

  The TZ30 is a native SCSI half-height implementation which is everything
the TK50 isn't. An excellent drive. I'd suggest using one of those if at
all possible.

	Terry Kennedy		Operations Manager, Academic Computing
	terry@spcvxa.bitnet	St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA
	terry@spcvxa.spc.edu	+1 201 915 9381
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: strike@steam.rome.ny.us (Strikemaster)
Subject: Just the number, please
Organization: Iron Horse InfoSys
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 03:17:48 GMT

All I need is the current number for adaptex.  Roy was kind enough to send
it via the newsgroup, but I managed to both lose the file and the
newsreader has expired the message.  The number I have worked two weeks
ago, but now I get a "This number has been disconnected" spiel.

1-817-488-6893 is what I have.

Red is the color of the face.

Sheepdip...


-- 
      Timothy B. Bowser; Sysadmin,       | strike@steam.rome.ny.us or try
    Chip Socketer & Tape Twiddler of     |    batcomputer!steam!strike
   The Iron Horse Information Service    |--------------------------------
----> "Advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo." <----
From: jack@admin.mport.COM (Jack Craig)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: (Industry) standard for Scanner on SCSI ?
Date: 15 Oct 92 19:40:52 GMT
Organization: Microport Inc., Scotts Valley, CA 95066 US of A

geirp@mekker.uio.no (Geir Pedersen) writes:


>Many scanners may be connected to a host over SCSI. I presume this is
>done using the standard SCSI or SCSI-2 commands. Are these vendors
>using the commands according to some standard, or is the usage vendor
>specify? 

hp's scanjet IIc embeds the escape sequences used for parallel port
use of the scanner in scsi datablks and writes them to the scanner.
the scanner controller extracts the sequences and uses them.

this is _NOT_ standard scsi. i'm not sure scsi II defines scanners
protocol, i think scsi-III does though.

jack...
=============================================================================
 Jack Craig  Microport         SVR4 408-438-UNIX   uunet!mport.com!jack
             Software Horizons SVR3 408-684-1375   uunet!sco.com!blznrzn!jack
=============================================================================