HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: alvstad@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Joel D Alvstad)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Twins/superstition
Date: 14 Aug 92 05:12:13 GMT
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN

In article <1992Aug13.121944.2791@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> sschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Susan E Schudt) writes:
>
>
>
>In article <56712@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> jasdzews@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Gary James
> Jasdzewski) writes:
>>Last night I ate a restaurant that had ESPN on in a corner.  I saw an
>>update on the Twins/Rangers game and the Twins were up 3 to 2.
>>Actually I thought it was the final score because Espn had what I
>>thought was a WP next to Edens' name.  So I was up.
>>
>>Later, I get into my car and turn on the AM.  It was one of those
>>nights where stations from Mexico were coming in clear, and I happened
>>upon WCCO, the Twins' station in Mpls.  I was a bit confused because
>>it was the top of the ninth, the Twins up 3 to 2, and guess who is in
>>to "close" the door?
>>
>>I was not intensely pissed off this time though, because I now believe
>>that I am in a way responsible for Aggies' blown saves.  I need to be
>>convinced that this is stupid, ,.bcaogkjarih;wgfa;v
>>
>>Anyone have this kind of superstition?
>
>
>No, just sadness! :(  It seems to me Jeff Reardon had the same problem after 
>the Twins won the series in '87.  Do I remember correctly?  Its the after-we 
>win-it-all-syndrome.  Either that or the Ron Davis syndrome.  Anyone remember
>HIM?
>-- 
>           Susan E. Schudt                    0 0
>     Dept. of Chemical Engineering
>      Goooooooooooooooooo  IRISH!           \_____/
>             Win Twins!

You mean the guy that blew a 10-run lead TWICE in the same series against the
tribe to hand the 1984 division title to the Royals on a silver platter??

I don't think the Twins would have beat Detroit that year in the LCS, but good
ol' RD didn't give us Twins fans the chance.  I despised him with all my heart
until the second the ball hit Hrbek's glove for the final out of the 87 series.

Joel Alvstad
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
alvstad@stolaf.edu

TWINS 1992--Back 2 Back
From: dpassage@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU (David Paschich)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Save the Giants
Date: 17 Aug 92 00:51:27
Organization: Computer Scientists Against the Oppression of Crutons
	<1992Aug17.060506.668@leland.Stanford.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eden.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: claudius@leland.Stanford.EDU's message of Mon, 17 Aug 92 06:05:06 GMT

In article <1992Aug17.060506.668@leland.Stanford.EDU>, 
	claudius@leland.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu) writes:

   I think buying a major league team, due to the fact that the value of teams go
   up so quickly, is a *great* investment.  However, I am less than optimistic
   about the share-holding plan that these people are putting together.  Unlike
   Bob Lurie (who owns the whole team), if you own a tiny fraction of the team,
   you cannot sell the team to the highest bidder on your whim, and therefore I
   think that in fact you will likely not gain anything by investing under this
   plan.

Sure you can.  It happens all the time.  It's called the stock market.

If I'm not mistaken, there is a large amount of outstanding stock in
the Boston Celtics.  I recall some sort of story about how there were
some large number of people, bars, etc that owned one or two shares,
and that the team was considering stopping sending stockholder
reports, etc to people who owned a small number of shares in order to
save money.

David Paschich
From: kettler@mitme5.mit.edu (KETTLER, THOMAS R.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Dream Team
Date: 15 Aug 92 09:50:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: mitme5.15AUG199204505442
Organization: MIT Lab for Nuclear Science
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1

In article <8eVc0xm00WBO81LAE5@andrew.cmu.edu>, Todd Harris Fletcher <tf0y+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes...
>RP Greg Olson

Gee! You're going to have a catcher as one of your Dream Team closers. I don't 
think that is very smart. Greg Olson (one g) is the catcher for the Braves, 
Gregg Olson (two g's) is the closer for the Orioles. Come on, people. It is the 
same as seeing people consistently write Cincinnatti for Cincinnati.

					Sincerely yours,

					Thomas R. Kettler "Expos Fanatic"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: tomscud@ruf.rice.edu (Thomas Reid Scudder)
Subject: Re: Mel's Enfant Terrible Todd (WAS Question-infield fly rule)
Organization: Rice University
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 04:38:00 GMT

In article <36878@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> demers@cs.ucsd.edu (David DeMers) writes:
>In article <4200328@hpcc01.corp.hp.com> krattige@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Kim Krattiger) writes:
>>If I understand correctly, the infield fly rule is to prevent the fielder 
>>from dropping the ball on purpose to get a double play.  What I don't
>>understand, is why does there have to be runners at first AND second for
>>it to be called.  If there is a runner at first only, it is just as possible
>>for the fielder to drop the ball for the double play.
>
>>Or am I way off on why the infield fly rule is called?????
>
>Er, well, usually the batter isn't Benito Santiago, and will
>run out the pop fly, thus almost certainly beating the relay.
>So with just a runner on first, it's very hard to turn a DP 
>on a pop fly.
>
Which explains why there have to be TWO runners on... It would be easy to turn
a second and third double play.

Tom Scudder
tomscud@ruf.rice.edu
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Twins/Mariners Game-10   8/16/92
Date: 17 Aug 92 00:02:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: plains.19754
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


         Twins ............ 7  ;   Mariners .............8

After holding 5-1 and 7-3 leads, the Twins just buckled under
and lost 8-7 and are now 5 behind the "Will they ever lose"
Athletics. The Atletics won their tie with the Angels, 5-4
in the bottom of the 9th.

At one point in the season, the Twins just looked invincible
with 4-run leads. It is no longer the case, if one goes by
their past few games. 

The Twins made reckless base-running mistakes, the chief participants
being Munoz and Knoblauch.  The Twins just beat themselves. 

With only about 42 games remaining in the season, looks like
the As, if they can avoid a major slump which looks like
it could never happen with their blazing bats and the unhittable
EK, could hold on.

S.H
Forever Twins
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: dave@silver.sni.ca (Dave Till)
Subject: Re: Bass and Marlins
Organization: Jays Fans Chanting Healing Spells To Help Juan Guzman, Inc.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 20:11:27 GMT

In article <1992Aug11.191706.838732@locus.com> aardvark@locus.com (Warren Usui) writes:
>Maybe the Marlins can also hire Catfish Hunter, Tim Salmon, Steve Trout,
>and Harvey Haddix (sp.).  Jeff Musselman and Preacher Roe may be pushing it.  
>Bob Lemon and Danny TARTARbull is.

I assume that Don Gullett is out of the question?

Brian Fisher can handle these guys with no trouble, of course.  And we're
not even going to *talk* about Hooks Dauss...
-- 
--Dave Till, SNI, Sietec Open Systems Division (dave@snitor.uucp or "Hey, you")
"My Canada Includes The World Series" -- banner seen at SkyDome
Blue Jays all the way in '92!   (Allons-y Expos!)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: brian@meaddata.com (Brian Curran)
Subject: The COMPLETE Red Sox Protected List
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 19:47:53 GMT

The COMPLETE Red Sox Protected List:

Sherm Feller.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Curran                 Mead Data Central              brian@meaddata.com 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bobby Bragan, Milwaukee Braves manager, on catcher Joe Torre:
 "I can't understand why he hasn't been nicknamed Chicken.  Don't you get it?
   Chicken Catcher Torre!"
From: rinehart@aramis.rutgers.edu (Mark J. Rinehart)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Tom Seaver for President
Date: 13 Aug 92 14:54:46 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <12AUG92.14490558@vax.clarku.edu> hhenderson@vax.clarku.edu writes:

> Tom Seaver is a great speechmaker.  He should run for President.
> How about Jerry Koosman as V.P.?  (Where *is* Kooz nowadays?)
> Heather


He may be a great speech maker. I don't know, having never heard him
make a speech. But as a Yankees announcer, he sucks big time. He is
the single worst broadcaster I've ever heard. Fortunately for Yankees
fans, MSG broadcasts 2/3s of the Yankees games, so we don't have to
listen to Tom Terrific too much. And don't get me wrong, he was a
great pitcher and belongs in the HOF, no question. I just wish he'd
take a coaching job somewhere, or get some diction lessons.


Mark
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: bk713@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Kimon Zachary)
Subject: Re: Take Jeff Reardon, please!
Reply-To: bk713@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Kimon Zachary)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 92 14:24:56 GMT


In a previous article, dswartz@redondo.sw.stratus.com (Dan Swartzendruber) says:

>
>I don't suppose someone would consider shooting Jeff Reardon and dumping
>his body in the same ditch as Jimmy Hoffa's?
>
>-- 
>
>Dan S.
>


This may be difficult if Hoffa really is encased in concrete under the 
Meadowlands.

Can the Red Sox option him to Pawtucket to keep Plantier company?


-- 
Kimon Zachary			"I stand by all the misstatements that
JHU School of Med.			I've made." --Dan Quayle
Baltimore, MD		
Never mind the Dream Team, bring back Midori Ito and Kristi Yamaguchi
From: dswartz@redondo.sw.stratus.com (Dan Swartzendruber)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Take Jeff Reardon, please!
Date: 15 Aug 92 03:15:32 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Software Engineering


I don't suppose someone would consider shooting Jeff Reardon and dumping
his body in the same ditch as Jimmy Hoffa's?

-- 

Dan S.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: snichols@adobe.com (Sherri Nichols)
Subject: Re: Re: Say it's so! Baseball in Tampa Bay!!!
Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 15:35:47 GMT

In article <4200325@hpcc01.corp.hp.com> boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell) writes:
>a positive position on a new park.  Just like with the Raiders.  Oakland
>was on the verge of getting them back last year but lost out because of
>posturing.

That's not my perception of what happened.  The Oakland mayor and city
council had agreed to give the Raiders an incredible sweetheart deal,
including guaranteeing a certain (large) amount of ticket revenues (the
city would have actually sold the tickets for the Raiders).  When the
inevitable lawsuit was filed, Davis backed out.  The Raider deal eventually
cost the mayor of Oakland his job, when the people of the city got their
chance to let him know what he thought.

Sherri Nichols
snichols@adobe.com


Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: hasch@jhuvms.hcf.jhu.edu (Bruce M Hasch)
Subject: Re: 52 Re: Twins/superstition
Summary:  Pete Filson, net hall of famer (Acker Memorial Wing)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords:  filson, 0-fer, life
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University - HCF
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 20:58:00 GMT

In article <92227.27662.6669030@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM>, 6669030@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM writes...
>------------------------- Original Article -------------------------
>In article <l8liduINN9ae@saltillo.cs.utexas.edu> goolsbey@cs.utexas.edu (Keith G
> 
>>[Discussion of a former Minnesota closer deleted.]
> 
>>Please. Never mention his name aloud. I fear that the player in question
>>may return if we speak his name aloud.
> 
>>>Anyone remember Bobby Mitchell, Hosken Powell, Larry Hisle, Bombo Rivera,
>>>arrell "3 errors on one play" Jackson etc. from the Twins' *very* lean years?
>Anyone remember Redfern, Thormodsgard, and Filson?
>These memories tell me that things now aint all too bad....
>>These were actually some of Minnesota's better bad players. The fielders
>>tended to be average. It was the pitching staff that usually stunk to high
>>heaven. One of my treasured memories is watching Terry Felton lose his
>>12th game in a row.
> 
>>*sigh* Those weren't the days.
>--
>Did Felton ever win one game in the bigs?

I don't have his exact numbers handy, but he finished with a career record
of 0-14 or so.  Never did get a win in the majors.  

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
O's-Twins ALCS??         
Ripken vs Puckett in the Ron Shapiro dream matchup?
Jacobs: Sign Cal Now!!                   Bruce 'Slower than Sam Horn' Hasch
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: bagneltw@newton.ccs.tuns.ca (Trevor W Bagnell)
Subject: Cy Yonnd Awards for last place teams...
Organization: Technical University of Nova Scotia, Halifax, N.S.
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 16:20:27 GMT



Well, i know this has happened at least once.
Steve Carlton did it for the Phillies. The team only one 54 games and Carlton    had 27 of them and won the Cy.
  I think Clemens will duplicate this feat again this year. Can you imagine if  Clemens actually pitched for a team who gave him run support(i.e. Toronto or     perhaps Atlanta). He'd be 30-4! Especially this year. I have personally watched Jeff (could someone please remove this dildo from my ass) Reardon blow 3 saves this year and Clemens(of course) got the loss.
  If i were Clemens, I would want to be traded to a decent team.......Hmmmmm.....Toronto needs pitching help don't they.

  Guzman, Carter, and Maldonado -------for---->CLEMENS!!

  Boston gets a decent young pitcher in Guzman, some decent outfielders that don't sit out games for no reason, and some home run power.

  Toronto get the best pitcher in baseball plus a world series or three.

  Works for me,
  -mike
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Monday, 17 Aug 1992 23:41:06 EDT
From: Ryan Robbins <IO20456@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: JEFF REARDON
 <1992Aug16.063315.14427@news.stolaf.edu> <1992Aug17.174244.24481@osf.org>

In article <1992Aug17.174244.24481@osf.org> ron@osf.org (Ron
Birnbaum) writes:

     He can't help it - he's just used too much! He's actually
     quite effective when used every 4th day or so - then is ERA is
     very good. But when used with less than 2 days rest, his ERA
     is about 4. I forget the exact figures, but these stats were
     given in Gammons Globe column yesterday.

A reliever's earned run average is worthless when used to determine
a reliever's effectiveness. This is because closing relievers only
pitch about an inning or two at a time. One bad outing can kill a
reliever's ERA. Probably the single most accurate predictor of a
reliever's effectiveness is the number of runners he inherits that
do not come around to score. After all, a relief pitcher's role
(a closer's, that is) is to prevent runners from scoring.

A high ERA is misleading: the reliever may have had a terrible
inning or two. A low ERA is misleading: closers don't pitch that
many innings, and they often have the upperhand hand, in that they
are coming in fresh; there's hardly a fatigue factor.

+===============================================================+
||   RYAN ROBBINS                    INTERNET:                 ||
||   UNIVERSITY OF MAINE             IO20456@MAINE.MAINE.EDU   ||
+===============================================================+
From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 20:35:58 GMT
Subject: Re: Re: Say it's so! Baseball in Tampa Bay!!!
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball

Putting all the blame on Jordan and Lurie is silly.  Feinstein (bless her
heart) and Agnos are more to blame than Jordan.  Jordan entered the arena
much too late IMO.

Blaming the fans is stupid.  Only a small percentage of SF fans live in SF.
As such, the measures in SF were easily defeated because none of the rest of 
us got to vote.  Same deal applies when you take an individual county in the
south bay.  SF fans are spread out all over from Marin to Fremont to Santa
Cruz etc...there isn't a big enough concentration in any one place to pass
an unpopular ballot measure that will raise taxes.  

The only way to get this to work would have been a vote that included the
entire bay area.  Had this taken place I am sure we'd have a new stadium
being built right now.

If there is blame it is in the fact that many chose to make this a big
political issue.  As with the latest fiasco with the Raiders, local politicians
were so busy posturing that they lost sight of what was at stake.  It was
easier for these people to preach 'I am the anti-tax hike schmo' than to take
a positive position on a new park.  Just like with the Raiders.  Oakland
was on the verge of getting them back last year but lost out because of
posturing.

The end result to both Oakland and SF is the loss of a professional franchise
and all of the money said franchise brought into the community.  We are talking
about millions of dollars per year.

There is still a ray of hope but I am not an optimist.  Until we sack all of
the idiots politicians we will get what we get.

************************************************
* Donald Boell - Hewlett Packard               *
*                                              *
* When you're chewing on life's gristle        *
* Don't grumble, give a whistle - Monty Python *
*                                 Life of Brian*
************************************************
From: csquared@coos.dartmouth.edu (C Squared)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Angels 3, Red Sox 2
Keywords: baseball, men's professional, broadcast
Date: 20 Aug 92 13:16:48 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Originator: csquared@coos.dartmouth.edu

In article <1992Aug20.043905.10700@leland.Stanford.EDU> claudius@leland.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu) writes:
>I guess Reardon has taken the art of "relieving" to new heights.  Giving up
>doubles to Stevens *and* DiSarcina?  Gee...  (Of course, as an Angel fan, I'm
>not complaining...)
>
The hit to DiSarcina was a single.

C Squared
From: roblesc@nic.cerf.net (Carlos A. Robles)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Multiple hit games...
Date: 17 Aug 92 15:29:38 GMT
Organization: CERFnet

This past week Gary Sheffield had an extraordinary streak of 8 
multiple hit games.  Was this the record for this feat?  If not
who holds the record for consecutive (2 or more and 3 or more) hit 
games.

Please respoond to carlos@cerf.net
From: snichols@adobe.com (Sherri Nichols)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Say it's so! Baseball in Tampa Bay!!!
Date: 12 Aug 92 18:20:24 GMT
Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated

In article <Tanya_Davis.esh-120892094551@tahiti.slac.stanford.edu> Tanya_Davis.esh@qmail.slac.stanford.edu (Tanya Davis) writes:
>SHERRI--
>
>I really thought I'd receive a "better" comeback than what you came up
>with.  You really seem to like that word "whining."  I think that's a
>copout.  Especially since I was stating facts and reasons -- hardly
>whining.  

That you think the A's have "an attitude" may indeed be a fact; that
doesn't make it not whiny.

I personally don't care whether any of the Giants fans like or dislike the
A's.  Everybody is entitled to like whatever they want.  However, you and
the other Giants fans are coming across as if having the A's is not better
than having no team at all.  Having spent time in cities with and without
major league baseball, I find this attitude silly.

I am a baseball fan.  Yes, there are teams I like, and teams I don't like,
but if a team I don't like is my only way to see major league baseball,
I'll still go to the games, and still watch the games, even if only to root
against the other team.  I'm not in particular a Giants fan or an A's fan,
but I still go to games.

I grew up 300 miles from a major league baseball team.  Most of the time I
was growing up, the nearest *minor* league team was a 4 hour drive away.
That's why I find this attitude distasteful.

Sherri Nichols
snichols@adobe.com
From: efindler@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Edward Findler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Village Voice Trivia Quiz: My Guesses
Date: 13 Aug 92 14:48:57 GMT
Reply-To: efindler@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Edward Findler)
Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD



Here are my guesses to a few of the quiz questions.

23.  The player who described cocaine as a demon in me, Keith Hernandez

29.  The player who sold his World Series ring, I think was Sandy Amoros

33.  The player who was convicted of gambling,racketeering and all that,
Denny McClain

38.  Executive who talked about blacks in high postitions- Al Campanis

39.  Life magazine article, Joe Dimaggio


Just my feeble attempts,
-- Ted Findler
-- 
__________________________________________________________
|        Ted Findler         | Watch for Cal in June '95 |
| efindler@oasys.dt.navy.mil |  Consecutive Game #2131   |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: hasch@jhuvms.hcf.jhu.edu (Bruce M Hasch)
Subject: Re: Phillies/Orioles Trade(Scarsone/Bell)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University - HCF
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 21:42:00 GMT

In article <23672@oasys.dt.navy.mil>, hambric@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Stephen Hambric) writes...
>In rec.sport.baseball, claudius@leland.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu) writes:
> 
>->But Hoiles is *not* clearly better than Tettleton. Milligan is clearly better
>->than Murray.
> 

This is not an imporant point, though.  Just because a team has a glut of 
talent at a position is not cause to justify a trade in which the team making
the trade does not receive adequate talent in return.  

>Let's qualify this:  clearly better in your opinion according to selected
>statistics.  In *my* opinion, Murray is a future HOFer who should have
>closed out his career in Balmer.

Agreed.  After 1983, BOTH Murray and Ripken's offensive statistics took
a nosedive--the press was absolutely BRUTAL to Murray, when the real reason
for the O's fall was the decimation of the pitching staff, and a crop of
aging, starting veterans (Dempsey, Bumbry, Lowenstein/Roenicke, et. al.)

> 
>->Besides, everybody knew at the time that Jeff M. Robinson was a stiff, and he
>->has never put up decent stats except for one year ('88).  Holton appeared to
>->be a steady setup man at the time.
> 
>The E-man should have been worth a hell of a lot more than a steady
>set up man (in my opinion).  You're right though, the Tettleton trade
>was far worse and will live forever in Oriole infamy.  (Maybe when the
>Micker is a free agent he'll resign with the O's for megabucks).

UGH!  When that trade was announced, I absolutely went NUTS.  It was
bad enough to trade Tettleton at all, but for Jeff Robinson??? 
At least the Murray deal was a bust because Bell never developed,
Holton disintegrated and Bradley's skills declined rather rapidly. 
On the other hand, EVERYONE knew Robinson sucked toads.  But I 
seriously doubt ol' Mr. Froot Loops will come back to Baltimore for about
ten reasons:

10. Chris Hoiles is a solid catcher, and a possible future All-Star
 9. Roland Hemond would probably trade him for the OTHER Jeff Robinson
 8. thru 1. Eli Jacobs is a cheapskate--hell, he won't even pay Cal!

(Although, think about how many hits and deep drives Mickey misses
out on because he never gets to face Tiger pitching :-) :-) )

Speak of the devil, what happened to the BBDDD Research Institute Anyway?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacobs: Sign Cal Now!!              Bruce 'Slower than Sam Horn' Hasch
O's all the way in '92              E-mail at hasch@jhuvms.hcf.jhu.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: ccas27@ccsun.strath.ac.uk ("A.J.Anderson")
Subject: Boston Red Sox and Texas Rangers schedules
Organization: University of Strathclyde
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 13:58:24 GMT


 Could someone please e-mail or post the September home game schedules for the
 Boston Red Sox and the Texas Rangers.

 Thanks in advance

 Andy


Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball