HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser)
Subject: Re: Worldblazer fax upgrade
Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix  (508) 655-3848
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:54:18 GMT


>>NXFax should have support for the Telebit modems in release 1.03.
>>It won't have support for data/fax detection for incoming calls (like it
>>does for the ZyXEL) since the Telebit fax capability supposedly doesn't
>>provide support for this feature.

Then how does it work?  Are you saying you would have to manually change
a register to get it to recognize each kind of inbound call?

-- 
bill@unixland.natick.ma.us                      ESIX Mailing List Moderator
Public Access UNIX/USENET/E-MAIL!  UUCP Accounts Available!  (508) 655-3848
                            V.32/PEP/V.42bis, etc.   Located in Natick, MA USA
From: rlippert@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Ryan Jon Lippert)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: USR Sportster Question
Date: 17 Nov 1992 18:08:45 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: rlippert@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

I'm sure EVERYONE knows about the Sportster PROBLEM(?!) be able to have
a FULLY working Dual with just a few AT commands. What I wanna know is,In the
NEW version of the modem (After 4.1) did they change anything BESIDES the
Roms???? Like the mother-board or something.? Well if you know I'de be REAL
glad if u responded... thanks..


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: etam@fraser.sfu.ca (Edwin Tam)
Subject: SUPRA BUSY DETECTION (not!)
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 08:29:45 GMT

Has anyone else besides myself had BUSY detection problem?  I have
the H version roms, but sometimes the modem fails to detect a BUSY
tone.  This isn't a big deal, well, actually... to me it is.  Anyone
have a solution?


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: marcu@leland.Stanford.EDU (Marc Albert Ullman)
Subject: Re: Worldblazer fax upgrade
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 19:02:48 GMT

In article <1992Nov21.134815.5373@proponent.com> Monty Solomon <roscom!monty@think.com> writes:
>NXFax should have support for the Telebit modems in release 1.03.
>
>It won't have support for data/fax detection for incoming calls (like it
>does for the ZyXEL) since the Telebit fax capability supposedly doesn't
>provide support for this feature.

Are you serious?  How could Telebit blow it that badly?  That makes it
damn near useless.  Is that not a standard feature of the Class 2 "standard"?
Can anyone confirm this "fatal flaw"?

--Marc Ullman
  Stanford University

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: rfall@mv.us.adobe.com (Richard Fall)
Subject: Re: Telebit Worldblazer + Fax ??
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: Adobe
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 19:26:17 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.030956.23722@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>,
earle@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Greg Earle - Gainfully Unemployed) wrote:
> 

   [...]

> Well, this "Faster.  Better.  Cheaper." brochure that I just got in the mail
> from Telebit today can be ... (-:
> 
> The question is, why does the brochure only refer to T3000's?  It describes
> in detail the post-December 1st promotion involving $75 rebates for buyers of
> T3000's after November 1st, and the accompaning free FAX upgrade eligibility.
> But there's no mention of "WorldBlazer" anywhere, which is disappointing since
> after all, a WorldBlazer's just a T3000 on steroids ... (-:
> 
> Even a little "Oh, by the way, note to WorldBlazer owners - you don't get any
> of the great deals described in this brochure, but you can check this little
> box here to order your FAX upgrade after December 1st, 1992.  Please enclose

A quick call to Telebit this morning produced the information that the FAX
upgrade for the WorldBlazer _will_ be available shortly, and a mailing on
it
will occur sometime next week.

There will be a "window", from around December 1 to December 20, where the
upgrade
can be gotten for a reduced price ($99?, I think); after that it will go up
to
the final price, around $149.

No mention of whether there's a "window" for a free upgrade for those who
purchase WorldBlazers between now and then, but I didn't ask.

The customer service person said she'd gotten quite a few calls on this
subject, so perhaps Telebit won't make the mistake of separating T3000's
and
WorldBlazers again during an upgrade program.

 +--------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
 |  Richard Fall                  |  Voice:  (415) 962-4889           |
 |  Adobe Systems, Incorporated   |  Fax  :  (415) 903-9652           |
 |  P.O. Box 7900                 |-----------------------------------|
 |  1585 Charleston Road          |  Internet:  rfall@mv.us.adobe.com |
 |  Mountain View, CA  94039-7900 |  UUCP:    ..!decwrl!adobe!rfall   |
 +--------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: berger@atropa (Mike Berger)
Subject: Re: Intel Modems
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 22:06:20 GMT

john.navas@uttsbbs.uucp (John Navas)  writes:
>No, that is not my only complaint (although it is a major one).  Other
>problems in the 400 include:
>* Problems connecting with certain modems, particularly older 2400bps
>and down models.

*----
I haven't had this problem at all with my Intel 400/e.  It always connects
reliably, even at 1200 and 2400 baud.

>* Lower throughput than USR and other top data modems, particularly on
>poorer lines.
*----
My throughput has been better than the other modems I've compared wth, though
I haven't tried a USR.  What speeds are you getting with which software and
protocols?

>* Common speaker failures.
*----
Is it really common?  This is the first I've heard of it.

>* A customer service policy that expects users to pay for fixes to
>certain design defects.
*----
What does this mean?  All upgrades to my Intel 400/e have been free so far.

--
	Mike Berger
	Internet    berger@atropa.stat.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: rdippold@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Subject: Re: UART 16550 chip compatibles?
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:52:20 GMT

dixon@fourfold.ocunix.on.ca (dixon kenner) writes:
>rdippold@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold) writes:

>> Sure you don't have a 16550 instead of a 16550A?
>What is the difference between the 16550 and 16550A?

Oooooh, not much, just that the 16550 doesn't work.  Well, it does
work as a 16450/8250, but they screwed up the 16-byte buffer so that
it doesn't work.  Not very useful.  The 16550A was produced to fix
this problem.
-- 
In a novel the hero can lay ten girls and marry a virgin for the finish.  In a
movie that is not allowed.  The villain can lay anybody he wants, have as much
fun and as he wants cheating, stealing, getting rich, and whipping servants.
But you have to shoot him in the end. -- Herman Mankiewicz
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: RE: INTEL MODEMS
From: Burton Randol <TRIGC@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Date: Saturday, 21 Nov 1992 17:27:51 EST
Distribution: world
Organization: City University of New York/ University Computer Center

To slightly expand on my recent posting about the Intel 400 and
connections to some 2400 baud modems -

An early release of the driver software was unable to handle connections
to some 2400 baud installations, even if all error-correction was
switched off. This has been corrected in later releases of the driver.

At present and for some time, I have experienced no difficulty in
establishing and maintaining connections to a wide variety of installations,
from low to very high speed.

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: barrett@pamsrc.enet.dec.com (Keith Barrett)
Subject: Re: ECU
Reply-To: barrett@pamsrc.enet.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corp.
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:08:18 GMT


I'd like to try out ECU. Can someone send me a copy of the kit, or
a pointer to an archive? I must have missed it the first time around.


Thanks


Keith
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mikeg@asylum.tmc.edu (Michael Grabenstein)
Subject: Re: Magic Modems; any info?
Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Distribution: comp
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 19:40:29 GMT

	Something you might be interested to know is that your Magic
modem is basically a Zoom with the Magic label.
	What's the warrenty on the Magic modems???
Later,
	Mike
	mikeg@asylum.gsfc.nasa.gov
	or grabenst@umbc3.umbc.edu
From: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org (Christian Weisgerber)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: My Individual Private Site
Subject: ACEEX and "CONNECT"/DCD delay
Reply-To: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.04 Rev. Sep  5 1992
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 22:44:56 CET

I'm asking this on behalf of a friend of mine:

From various bug reports he received for his (modem related) application
he deduced that ACEEX V.32bis modems seem to behave strangely at the
time of connect: first the "CONNECT ..." result string is sent, then
there's a _pause_ of approximately _half_a_second_ before DCD is raised.

Since he only concluded this from bug reports and the source code
(sorry, I don't have any details) could a ACEEX 144 owner confirm this?


bye
-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber, Germany           naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
                            Just say +++ATH
From: djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: ZyXEL new ROM released -- 5.04
Date: 23 Nov 92 14:19:16 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

>   7. Correct compatibility problem with USR modem/fax.

Does anyone have more information about this? My ZyXEL (5.02 ROM) sometimes
disconnects from a USR v.32bis for no apparent reason (data, not fax,
connection). Is this the compatibility problem addressed by the new ROM?

On another matter, can anyone recommend an easy and inexpensive way to
get the new ROM. I realize that the code is free, but is it worth buying
an eprom burner or should I just get a ready-made chip from someone
else? In either case, can anyone recommend a stateside source. (I bought
my modem from the Kandy Shack, which sells new ROMs for $25. Is this the
best price available?)

Thanks,

David
-- 
Professor David J. Birnbaum         djbpitt+@pitt.edu [Internet]
The Royal York Apartments, #802     djbpitt@pittvms   [Bitnet]
3955 Bigelow Boulevard              voice: 1-412-687-4653
Pittsburgh, PA  15123  USA          fax:   1-412-624-9714
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: TELEBIT Trailblazer Plus(Help??)
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 15:47:02 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

kodagali@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu writes:

> I usually dial in to my university which supports 9600 baud rate. But
> whenever I dial in I seem to connect at only 2400 baud! 

   Are you sure that the modem you're dialing in to supports PEP?  There are 
several incompatible techniques of achieving 9600 bps over dialin phone lines.

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
       You're still young if your wallet is exhausted before you are.
From: marvin@tornado.oche.de (Christian Bode)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Problems with Netfax 3.2.1
Date: 20 Nov 92 08:14:26 GMT
Organization: Private UUCP Site / Member of IN e.V.

Hi Netlandians !!

Now I am in the state that I compiled Netfax 3.2.1 successfully on 
SYSV 3.2 ISC 3.0, but on my first steps I encountered that enscript
is missing in my distrubution.
Where do I find it ??? Am I doing anything wrong ????


Regards
  
     Marvin

-- 
  _ _ _                     |   Christian Bode, Aachen, FRG
 ' ) ) )              ,     |   marvin@tornado.oche.de
  / / / __  __  . .  , __   |   bode@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de
 / ' (_(_/_/ (_(__)_/_/ /   |
From: eli@spdcc.com (Steve Elias)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: brooktrout press release of 10/2/92
Date: 16 Nov 92 02:35:48 GMT
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA

hi folks -- here is the brooktrout press release of Oct 2.
i don't have the FRIA press release available, but
at least one reader thinks it ok that i post this anyway:


Needham Mass, oct 2 1992 -- brooktrout technology inc, owner
of a fundamental patent covering "fax on demand" technology, 
reported that it is engaged in legal proceedings involving the
patent with two manufacturers of fax-on-demand systems.

a complaint filed by the two manufacturers in the northern california
federal district court seeks a declaratory judgement to the effect
that brooktrout's patent is invalid and not infringed by the
manufacturers.  brooktrout had previously offered to license the
patent to the manufacturers for a royalty.

brooktrout's president, eric giler, said, "we do not regard this as a
material development.  brooktrout does not depend on patents to sell
its products, and has not relied on patent licensing as a source of
revenues.  the plaintiffs are seeking to avoid paying license fees
under the patent, and do not make any claim for damages.  we believe
they are simply trying to take advantage of the declaratory judgement
mechanism to control the timing and location of legal proceedings.
regardless of the outcome of the litigation, we do not expect that it
will have any material effect on the company (brooktrout)."

brooktrout's patent, issued by the US patent office in 1990, covers
generally any method for the selection of facsimile messages and their
deliver to a particular telephone number under control of commands
entered through a telephone, for example in the form of signals
generated from the telephone's touch-tone keypad.  this method is
employed in many fax-on-demand systems, which provide business users
and service providers the ability to offer automated fax delivery of
specified information in response to requests from customers,
subscribers or other callers.

based on the complaint filed in the declaratory judgement action and
prior communications with plaintiffs, brooktrout understands that they
will assert that brooktrout's method was anticipated by prior art.
brooktrout further understands that the litigation is being supported
by two competitors of brooktrout as well as the named plaintiffs.

mr. giler said, "brooktrout was a pioneer in developing fax-on-demand
using modern computer-based fax and voice technologies.  these efforts
resulted in the grant of our patent.  we intend to pursue this
litigation actively to uphold the validity of our patent, although w
are not able to make any prediction as to the outcome.  in the
meantime, we will continue offering licenses under the patent to
sellers and users of fax-on-demand systems."

************

any typos in the above are mine 

/eli
	
-- 
/* eli@spdcc.com */
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: starnaud@INRS-Telecom.UQuebec.CA (Nicolas St.Arnaud)
Subject: faxmodem C libraries on PC
Organization: INRS Telecommunications
Distribution: all
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:28:37 GMT

Hello!

  I want to develop some software in C++ to send faxes from PC compatible with
a fax modem.  I don't want to re-invent the wheel:

Q1. Are there libraries (in C or C++) for managing fax modem cards?

Q2. Is there a piece of software (other than Quick-Link II) that sends a fax
    from a DOS command line?  (It has to do a conversion from a text file to
    fax format) 

Q3. Is there a standard API (Application Programming Interface) to program fax
    modem cards?

Q4. (Hardware) Is there a widely-used chip set or other ready-made hardware
    used in many fax modems?


  Please reply via e-mail.  I will post a summary if there is enough interest.

Many thanks!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Nicolas Saint-Arnaud       |   starnaud@inrs-telecom.uquebec.ca
 INRS-Telecommmunications   |   Statistics is the art of scientific lie. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: marinell@tortoise.cis.ohio-state.edu (tony marinello)
Subject: Fax software sources
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:48:03 GMT

Which ftp site carries source code, in any operating
system, for a group 3, class-2 Fax-modem?

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: rwifall@nmsu.edu (Richard J Wifall)
Subject: Re: Need syntax to set T.30 session subparam code VR to 1
Organization: NMSU Computer Science
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 04:54:27 GMT

In article <ANDERSON.92Nov17142813@zymurgy.bms.com> anderson@zymurgy.bms.com (Jay Anderson) writes:

>   My SupraFAXmodem v.32bis comes up expecting to send normal 98 lpi bitmaps.
>   Using fax-3.2.1, and ghostscript with the driver=faxhigh parameter, I'm
>   generating the fine 196 lpi bitmaps.  I know that I could use device=faxlow
>   but I don't want to.
>
>   What is the correct AT+F synatax to what I want (so I can modify lib/libfa
	Well, it's not quite that easy.  First of all, are you sure
that the fax you are sending too is capable of receiving the fine
quality?  If it isn't, then you are out of luck.  Secondly, it's not a
simple AT+F command. The actual resolution is negotiated based on the
capabilities of the sending and receiving machines during the "faxing"
process. So it also depends whether you are doing class 1 or class 2
commands.  I will assume that you are using class 2 commands (I am not
familiar with fax-3.2.1 but I assume that is what it uses)
The class two command is: AT+FDCC:VR,BR,WD,LN,DF,EC,BF,ST
 Where VR = vertical resolution ( 0=normal, 1=fine)
	BR = Bit rate
	WD = Page Width
	LN = Page length
	DF = Data compression format
	EC = Error Correction
	BF = Binary File Transfer
	ST = Scan Time
You probably will want to do AT+FDCC:1,5,0,2,0,0,0..

>   Thanks,
	Sure.. :)

>   Jay Anderson
	Richard Wifall

--
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=++=+==+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
|Richard Wifall - rwifall@nmsu.edu - IRCnick: TheJazz - Member GS<>IRC        |
|-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-/-\-|
|Ask me about DeskTracker, BorderBlinker, and a demo that Dave hasn't finished|
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: brother@sunarc.csu.murdoch.edu.au (Kaye Brotherwood)
Subject: Fax/Modem for constant traveller?
Summary: request for help
Keywords: fax, modem
Organization: Murdoch University
Date: 16 Nov 92 04:33:12 GMT

 am looking for a fax / modem to allow constant communication with
my BWC who travels a lot both within Australia and abroad (largely
Asia.

Can any one offer any do's don'ts or general advice.  He has a SHARP 
6741 laptop and would need to talk to a SUN SPARC WORKSTATION via
modem - the fax would not be a problem


Any advice appreciated.





Kaye M Brotherwood
Asia Research Centre
Murdoch University

brother@sunarc
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith Smith)
Subject: Re: MultiTech Fax Modems could run Gnu NetFax if you call
Organization: Keith's Computer, Hope Mills, NC
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 13:48:23 GMT

I'm going to follow up my own posting ...

In article <1992Nov16.203649.12376@ksmith.uucp> keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith Smith) writes:
>In article <716@mtndew.Tustin.CA.US> friedl@mtndew.Tustin.CA.US (Stephen Friedl) writes:

[ A discussion of supporting class 2 in fax software for unix ]

>>modems.  Why would we want this?
>
>So you can sell your software to people who didn't buy the single type
>of modem that you have.  For example, suppose Telebit gets off it's ass
>and builds fax into it's Worldblazer that is class 2 compatable.  Now
>LOTS of unix folks have WB modems, and Company M has software that
>supports class 2 fax modems, not as good as yours but similarly priced
>and it works with these 10 class 2 modems you already have.  Lessee I
>want fax, and I can trash all my Super-PEP screamer modems and buy
>MultiTech's at $600 a pop + your software, or I can buy this other
>software and a firmware upgrade, spend half the money and still have the
>same capability.  Now you tell me why.

And in the mail today.  A sheet from telebit.  For a Free upgrade to
class 2 fax on a T3000 modem & a $75 rebate. ding, ding, ding ...

Yea, who needs standards.
-- 
Keith Smith          uunet!ksmith!keith            5719 Archer Rd.
Digital Designs      BBS 1-919-423-4216            Hope Mills, NC 28348-2201
Somewhere in the Styx of North Carolina ...
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: st901745@pip.cc.brandeis.edu (Alastair M. Bor)
Subject: QUESTION: What FAX machine to buy?
Reply-To: st901745@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 00:36:10 GMT

The company I work for is interested in buying a new fax machine to replace
the 7 year old machine that we have now. They have a couple of questions
that perhaps net.wisdom could answer...


1) Whats the difference between Laser and LED style FAX machines?

2) Whats the most reliable and highest quality method of FAX printing?

3) What FAX machine is best when one faxes both domestic and international
   faxes (about 70/day).

Thank you very much,

Alastair M. Bor
st901745@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
From: albert@chain.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Rick Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: CorpFax
Date: 16 Nov 1992 23:25:36 GMT
Organization: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tx
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: chain.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu


	We have been testing CorpFax, a Computer Signal Corporation 
product.  However, their old  phone number no longer works, and directory
assistance doesn't have a new phone number.  Does anyone know what 
happened to them?
-- 
Rick Jones				Systems Support Center
albert@bcm.tmc.edu			Baylor College of Medicine
Voice: 713-798-7352			standard disclaimers apply
		Don't flame me because I'm beautiful.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,comp.sources.wanted
From: lenny@icus.ICUS.COM (Lenny Tropiano)
Subject: FaxPak -- whats the latest version?  Where can I get it?
Organization: ICUS Software Systems, Austin, Texas
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:36:33 GMT

I have a ZyXEL U1496E modem with Class 2 Fax protocol, and I actually
got the FaxPak 1.01 program compiled on my BSD system.  I am having
some problems specficially with sending faxes.  I seems to start syncing
with the remote fax machine, but doesn't actually get to the sending part.
It looks like the fax got spooled correctly, and converted to G3 protocol,
but I guess it doesn't like Class 2 as much as the Sierra format.  

What is the latest version?  Where can I get it? (ftp preferred) and
has anyone gotten it to work with a ZyXEL-like modem.

Thanks.

-- 
| Lenny Tropiano           ICUS Software Systems        lenny@icus.ICUS.COM |
|               ...!{cs.utexas.edu,ames,pacbell}!icus!lenny                 |
+-------------- 6905-B Argonne Forest Cove, Austin, TX 78759 ---------------+
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: esimon@wd.estec.nl (Erik Simonsen)
Subject: JAPAN HELP: Need info about Sharp A6 FAX FO-31
Keywords: Sharp Fax
Reply-To: esimon@wd.estec.esa.nl
Organization: ESA/ESTEC
Date: 17 Nov 92 09:46:14 GMT

Hi there,

Do you have a Sharp A6 FAX FO-31 or do you have access to one?
In that case I would be happy for your help.

I need some technical information about the setup of the FAX which is
not provided in my manual. 

- How to setup the FAX for 9600 baud (actually 4800)?

- How to setup the number of times of ringing before auto-answer (actually 2)?

- Do you have an explaination of the 16 DIP switches?

- What is your opinion about the FO-31? Possible to live with A6?

The FO-31 seems to be made only for the Japanese marked and has come here 
just exceptionally. Therefore the dealer cannot provide the above information
for the moment. The price here seems very attractive: $650.

Thanks in advance for your help,

Erik

--
Erik Simonsen, ESA/ESTEC WDP                __  __   _  European
Postbus 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk             /_  (_   /_| Space
Phone: +31 1719 3133 Fax: +31 1719 84295  /__  __) /  | Agency
E-mail: esimon@wd.estec.esa.nl           =======================
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,comp.dcom.modems