From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Subject: Re: Loren and Heather should bicker in person, not on net
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 01:14:54 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <1992Dec9.181804.2530@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>,
ece_0028@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu (David Anderson) wrote:
> 
> Good analogy, Loren, but the fact is that no matter how much sense you
> make, they will still spout that the fetus is not a life or not
> a person. (ad infinitum, ad nauseum)

In article <1992Dec9.182202.2593@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>,
ece_0028@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu (David Anderson) wrote:
> 
> Boy, Loren, you're making lots of sense today.  But, 'it's still
> not a child, it's still not a life, so don't touch my
> more-precious-than-a-life's rights.'

Then, in article <1992Dec18.181618.22775@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>,
ece_0028@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu (David Anderson) wrote:
> 
> In article <16DEC92.19472567@vax.clarku.edu> hsims@vax.clarku.edu writes:
> >In a previous article, ece_0028@bigdog.engr.arizona.edu (David Anderson) wrote:
> >>Let's limit the net to worthwhile discussions, ok?
> >>nuff said.
> >
> >What's the matter, David?  You used to be Loren's number one cheerleader.  
> >Did the pompoms get too heavy for you, or are you just to embarrassed to 
> >continue supporting such a clueless pro-forced-birther?
> 
> No, Heather, I (and probably 99% of the rest of the net) just felt
> that the constant and endless bickering between you and Loren,
> almost none of which contained anything intelligent from either side
> (I seem to remember something about a bet and somebody being tied
> to a chair) was pointless, juvenile, irrelevant, and certainly a
> waste of bandwidth.

Here we have an excellent example of the Common Newbie Nematode.  After
contributing nothing to any discussion other than his belief that women who
are raped never get pregnant, and his occasional yelps of "Attaboy, Loren!"
Mr. Anderson shares with us his belief that "99% of the rest of the net"
would rather not listen to Heather quite ably skewering Mr. Finkelstein for
being such a completely clueless fool.

Seems as though your hero is getting the worst of things here, Mr.
Anderson.  You might do better to quietly slink away.  If you keep jumping
up and down, yelling, "Don't hurt him!  Don't hurt him!" you're bound to
attract attention to yourself.

> It's time-consuming enough to wade through the 100+
> daily posts on t.a alone, without having to endure all that crap.

I'd definitely unsubscribe then, if I were you.

> I suppose flames are a constitutional right, but let's *all* try
> and keep them to a minimum, ok?  (I admit to my own guilt and
> agree to help)

I have a better idea.  Why don't you take yourself down to the nearest
highway, lie down in the express lane, and work on perfecting your
impression of a median divider?

> And, ftr, I believe the term is "pom pon", not "pompom";
> not that I agree to the above accusation, of course.

For the record, you haven't got the slightest, foggiest fuck of an idea
what you're talking about.  The term is most certainly "pom pom".

Hie thee hence, Mr. Anderson.  Take that single, lonely neuron of yours
with you when you go.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.