HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nanook@eskimo.celestial.com (Robert Dinse)
Subject: Re: "Power antennas"
Summary: Not deceptive
Organization: -> ESKIMO NORTH (206) For-Ever <-
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 23:13:14 GMT

In article <1992Jul23.075348.9704@cs.uri.edu>, reynhout@cs.uri.edu (Andrew Reynhout) writes:
>    My favorite antenna scam was a little top-of-tv mounted set of rabbit
> ears with a silly looking little (plastic) roughly parabolic dish in the
> middle.  It featured controls to spin the 3" dish around, and to change
> the angle of elevation.
>    The box called it a "satellite dish-style antenna" or similar.  Then 
> it said "...no costly subscription or decoder-box rental fees, because 
> this antenna uses a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT technology".
> 
>    I wonder how many technically ignorant people they managed to deceive.
> These things were selling for US$30...(!)

     I have to disagree, I don't see this as a scam at all.  A scam is where
you misrepresent something.  The outfit that sells this antenna does not in
the least mis-represent it.  One has to have no technical knowledge at all in
order to read the advertisement and know it does nothing more than rabbit ears.
The advertisement contains phrases like:

     1) Uses proven "RF" technology.  - No lie, ordinary rabbit ears.

     2) Works Just like ordinary rabbit ears.  - No deception at all here.

     3) A marketing breakthrough!  - Absolutely, the idea of honestly
                                     marketing a product is a breakthrough.

     4) (paraphrased) Satelite fees not required because it uses no
        satelite signal.

     At any rate, nothing in the advertisement impressed me as being the least
     bit deceptive, which is quite a novelty in advertising.  One doesn't have
     to be the least bit technically literate to read "Works just like
     ordinary rabbit ears" and realize this $30 antenna functions just like an
     ordinary $3.99 set of rabbit ears.

     Why would you still buy it?  Either cause you thought it looked neat or
you didn't read the advertisement.  If the latter, is that the advertisers
fault?  I think not.  If the former, are you not entitled to buy something just
because it looks neat?  Certainly those $399 quartz lamps don't have much else
in the way of reasons to exist.

Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: edw@m2xenix.psg.com (Ed Wright)
Subject: Re: how do you jam a CD player...
Organization: Pacific Systems Group, Portland Oregon US
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 00:09:53 GMT

In article <28391@goofy.Apple.COM> ems@Apple.COM (Mike Smith) writes:
>In article <1992Jul07.100016.188575@zeus.calpoly.edu> kwang@zeus.calpoly.edu (<The Scarecrow>) writes:
>
>...
>>The only real effective way that I can see that'd be effective against these
>>people would be to invent a practical EMP grenade.  Just pull the pin, drop
Boy ! what I wouldn't pay for that, put it on a bass seeking guided
and nuke thoses little assholes at the corner near my house.

>
>How about a 20kHz transmitter?  Should couple reasonably well into
>their speaker coils and be in-audible to most folks while really
>dampening their audio quality ... Now how to a make a compact 
>yagi for 20kHz ...

A yagi is kind of sloppy in terms of directionality for this application,
I think nothing short of a full rhombic would do.

step 1 harvest an old growth forest for the supports
step 2 .....
Ed
-- 
 REAL RADIOS             edw@m2xenix.psg.com            GLOW IN THE DARK
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<<^^>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    >>No Voice>>>>>> Amateur Radio   KA9AHQ @ 28.340  <<<<<<<No Vice<<
  >>> Kshatriya Auscultating 9 Ailurophiles Hypothesizing Quodlibets <<<
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: nanook@eskimo.celestial.com (Robert Dinse)
Subject: Re: "Power antennas"
Summary: Try reading the ad first
Organization: -> ESKIMO NORTH (206) For-Ever <-
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:24:32 GMT

In article <91960@bu.edu>, steelie@csa.bu.edu (James Howard) writes:
> In article <1992Jul24.231314.10498@eskimo.celestial.com> nanook@eskimo.celestial.com (Robert Dinse) writes:
> >In article <1992Jul23.075348.9704@cs.uri.edu>, reynhout@cs.uri.edu (Andrew Reynhout) writes:
> >>    My favorite antenna scam was a little top-of-tv mounted set of rabbit
> >> ears with a silly looking little (plastic) roughly parabolic dish in the
> >> middle.  It featured controls to spin the 3" dish around, and to change
> >> the angle of elevation.
> >> These things were selling for US$30...(!)
> >
> >     I have to disagree, I don't see this as a scam at all.  A scam is where
> >you misrepresent something.  The outfit that sells this antenna does not in
> >the least mis-represent it.  One has to have no technical knowledge at all in
> >order to read the advertisement and know it does nothing more than rabbit ears.
> 
>  Give me a break.  Sounds like you have a stake in that scam company.

     I have no connection what-so-ever other than having read the advertisement
in question and found it quite humorous.

> Look, at the bottom of the ad, they say they will throw in a free
> guide to satellite TV and reception.  Obviously, the company is
> doing everything they can to convince some poor joe that he 
> is going to be able to receive satellite TV with this hunk of junk. 

     Possibly you've read a different advertisement than I did, I thought we
were talking about the one with the gold colored dish with little things
sticking out the front of it.  It clearly states that it doesn't use satelite
signals.

> They walk right up to the line of deception.   True, anyone
> with common electronic sense will laugh at this ad,  but I think
> you overestimate the average Joe.    Like they say in Mass Media 101:
> "No one ever went broke by underestimating the intelligence of their
> audience."

     The latter is probably quite true, however, I can't blame a company for
printing an advertisement that is 100% true.  If someone else isn't literate,
that certainly isn't the advertisers fault.

Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: toney@milton.u.washington.edu (I met Elvis + lived...)
Subject: antena question
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 19:34:33 GMT

Hi what is a yagi antena..

	Apologies if this is a insipid question.

joeboy


Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: eleea1n@Rosie.UH.EDU
Subject: Re: "Power antennas"
Reply-To: eleea1n@Rosie.UH.EDU
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 02:21:40 GMT

Sounds like a story my Electromagnetics prof once told us.  They took
apart a set of rabbit ears that had three distinct knobs on top for
extra fine tuning.  Inside were three mechanisms to produce click 
noises when the knobs were turned, nothing more.
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: edw@m2xenix.psg.com (Ed Wright)
Subject: Re: Reliable Electronics Parts Supplier
Organization: Pacific Systems Group, Portland Oregon US
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 00:57:36 GMT

In article <1992Jul20.015504.24701@newssun.med.miami.edu> cmorford@umbio.med.miami.edu (Chuck Morford) writes:
>Does anyone out there have the address of a reliable parts house?

Quement Electronics, Bascom Ave, San Jose, Ca Good supply of parts
	willing to ship, amateur sectionm helpful

Newark Electronics SF Bay Area, an old standby

Arlington Electronic Wholesaler, Lee Highway, Arlington, VA

There should be plenty of places in miami !

-- 
 REAL RADIOS             edw@m2xenix.psg.com            GLOW IN THE DARK
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<<^^>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    >>No Voice>>>>>> Amateur Radio   KA9AHQ @ 28.340  <<<<<<<No Vice<<
  >>> Kshatriya Auscultating 9 Ailurophiles Hypothesizing Quodlibets <<<
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: lombardo@cwis.unomaha.edu (Obiwan Kenobi)
Subject: Transmitters
Summary: None
Keywords: None
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 22:31:20 GMT

Does anyone know how I can broadcast on 98.5MHz with a crystal walkie-talkie?  (
Or if it is even possible?) I planned on going to a custom crystal place and
asking for a 98.5 crystal, but they only make crystals up to 22.2.  I heard
that I could use a multiplier to get to the higher frequency, but I don't know
how I would hook it up or if I could even get it.

I am also looking into the fm-10 transmitter that is covered in Radio Electronics,
is it very powerful, and is it easy to hook up an amp to make the broadcast
more powerful?  Could you get one of these things to broadcast over an existing
station?

Any information would be appreciated.

Send all flames to /dev/null

Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: reynhout@cs.uri.edu (Andrew Reynhout)
Subject: Re: "Power antennas"
Organization: University of Rhode Island, Computer Science Dept.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 07:53:48 GMT

mjbrown@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Mike J. Brown) writes:
>Recently I've been seeing on TV these commercials advertising
>"power antennas" which you plug into your wall outlet and supposedly
>it "turns your entire household electrical wiring into a super TV
>antenna", eliminating the need for rabbit ears, roof antennas,
>cable tv, etc.
>
>Now, I'm no electrical expert, but something about this doesn't sound
>right... they claim the reception is fantastic... can anybody offer
>some info or opinions on them?

   You're correct to be suspicious.  If you have no antenna whatsoever,
installing one of these puppies *will* help your reception.  However,
even if you have a simple dipole (or even a straight-wire) antenna, 
these things are of no benefit.
   Think about the electrical wiring in your house -- the tangled web
of wire that forms sort of a cage around your living areas.  This is 
hardly a useful antenna configuration.  The many different angles and
planes are more efficient at reducing signal than increasing it...but
again, it's better than (absolutely) NOTHING.

   My favorite antenna scam was a little top-of-tv mounted set of rabbit
ears with a silly looking little (plastic) roughly parabolic dish in the
middle.  It featured controls to spin the 3" dish around, and to change
the angle of elevation.
   The box called it a "satellite dish-style antenna" or similar.  Then 
it said "...no costly subscription or decoder-box rental fees, because 
this antenna uses a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT technology".

   I wonder how many technically ignorant people they managed to deceive.
These things were selling for US$30...(!)

   Andrew
-- 
   Andrew <reynhout@cs.uri.edu>    "If you remind me of my dog,
                                    we'll probably get along"  -jane siberry
   meow
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: edw@m2xenix.psg.com (Ed Wright)
Subject: Re: How do pirates do it?
Organization: Pacific Systems Group, Portland Oregon US
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 01:01:24 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.001917.10936@eoc.com> mikec@eo31.eoc.com (Mike Cheponis) writes:
>In article <1992Jul15.203819.3126@m2xenix.psg.com> edw@m2xenix.psg.com (Ed Wright) writes:
>>In article <710831271.F00001@tdkt.kksys.com> Lomker@tdkt.kksys.com (Michael Lomker) writes:
>>>-> I am fascinated by the concept of pirate radio broadcasting.  How
>>>-> do the pirates on 7415 khz avoid getting caught?  Are they mobile?
>>>
>>>    It is not particularly easy to pinpoint a signal on the lower
>>
>>Let me burst your bubble.
>>If the FCC wants you, it take less than 5 minutes, and you can be
>
>Then my question: Why doesn't the FCC bust all the pirates, if they are so
>easy to locate?
>
Time, Money, and Manpower constraints.
Pretty much the same reasons they allowed 11 metres to become the
playground of the braindead .

Hell, 80 meters sounds like CB already, and 2 meters is.

-- 
 REAL RADIOS             edw@m2xenix.psg.com            GLOW IN THE DARK
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<<^^>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    >>No Voice>>>>>> Amateur Radio   KA9AHQ @ 28.340  <<<<<<<No Vice<<
  >>> Kshatriya Auscultating 9 Ailurophiles Hypothesizing Quodlibets <<<
From: wells@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (John Wells)
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 20:01:43 GMT
Subject: Re: how do you jam a CD player...
Organization: Zanzor of the CLOUDS
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate

In alt.radio.pirate, billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:

> Bill sez:
> 10.9 Mhz for fm - if I remember correctly. It has been many years since I
> studied the subject, so i could be wrong. AM is 455 Khz.
> 

Actually FM is 10.7 mhz with carrier deviation of around +/-100 khz and
AM car radio uses 2 different IF frequencys, 262 khz and 455 khz.

Most of the thump box kids around here listen to the FM radio and I'd doubt 
that much bass/rap is on AM since it isn't hifi enough. 

For real good FM IF zapping you can easily get ~100 watts out of solid state 
oscillator/ power amp stage so it surely does not need to be big.  A 108 inch
CB whip with a base loading coil will work the best and not be all that notice-
able.   Since the most obnoxious car sound around here is that 20 hertz thump
stuff..... I'd suggest that a constant modulation of 100% at 20 hertz would
cause the speaker to eventualy heat up and smoke and then no more window 
rattling sonic pollution.

To detonate a tape deck ya need a real strong electromagnet operating 
around 20 hertz.... hope to induce enough flux into the head from a distance
to get through all the sheilding and cause the amp to go into a resonate
max power thrash the speaker self destruct mode.

A kilowatt at 147 mhz will usually screw up the electronics in a CD player.
(Wonder how I found that out  ;-)  )


Just some rumblings from me to the net.  Please don't try this at home or 
on the road.  ;-)  

			John   
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: mikec@eo31.eoc.com (Mike Cheponis)
Subject: Re: How do pirates do it?
Organization: EO, Inc.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 00:19:17 GMT

In article <1992Jul15.203819.3126@m2xenix.psg.com> edw@m2xenix.psg.com (Ed Wright) writes:
>In article <710831271.F00001@tdkt.kksys.com> Lomker@tdkt.kksys.com (Michael Lomker) writes:
>>-> I am fascinated by the concept of pirate radio broadcasting.  How
>>-> do the pirates on 7415 khz avoid getting caught?  Are they mobile?
>>
>>    It is not particularly easy to pinpoint a signal on the lower
>>frequencies.  It requires the cooperation of a dozen listening stations
>>positioned throughout the country taking signal readings.....it is
>>rather time consuming.
>>    Most pirates keep their transmissions to a short duration...20
>>minutes or less.  That doesn't give the FCC much time to work with.
>
>Let me burst your bubble.
>If the FCC wants you, it take less than 5 minutes, and you can be
>located with ease to within 50'
>I have watched it happen.
>Ed
>-- 
> REAL RADIOS             edw@m2xenix.psg.com            GLOW IN THE DARK
>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<<^^>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>    >>No Voice>>>>>> Amateur Radio   KA9AHQ @ 28.340  <<<<<<<No Vice<<
>  >>> Kshatriya Auscultating 9 Ailurophiles Hypothesizing Quodlibets <<<

Then my question: Why doesn't the FCC bust all the pirates, if they are so
easy to locate?


Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: lloyd@eastern.COM (lloyd)
Subject: fm-10
Organization: Eastern's Public Access BBS, Toronto CAN
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 04:08:28 GMT

Can someone send me the schematics, or tell me where I can get them for the 
FM-10 transmitter.  Also any information or schematics for amps for it would 
also be appreciated.
  
  
lloyd@eastern.com
From: med016@muvms3.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
Subject: Cure station in england
Date: 23 Jul 92 16:30:20 GMT
Organization: Marshall University

I've heard that the Cure has its own pirate radio sttion in England, does
anybody know anything about this?  Does anybody have any of it on tape?  Just
curious.   - sarat raman
From: ems@Apple.COM (Mike Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
Subject: Re: how do you jam a CD player...
Date: 16 Jul 92 23:15:55 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

In article <1992Jul07.100016.188575@zeus.calpoly.edu> kwang@zeus.calpoly.edu (<The Scarecrow>) writes:

>If they can afford that much in stereo equipment, they'd have a direct
>cd-to-amp hookup, rather than degrading the signal by using FM as an
>intermediary.
...
>The only real effective way that I can see that'd be effective against these
>people would be to invent a practical EMP grenade.  Just pull the pin, drop
>it into their open window, and *poof*.  just make sure that either
>your car is properly shielded, or be far far away 8>  wouldn't want your
>engine computer to go up in a poof of smoke, now would we? 8>

How about a 20kHz transmitter?  Should couple reasonably well into
their speaker coils and be in-audible to most folks while really
dampening their audio quality ... Now how to a make a compact 
yagi for 20kHz ...

-- 
E. Michael Smith  ems@apple.COM

"Nothing can keep an argument going like two persons who aren't
sure what they're arguing about."   O.A.Battista
From: SSCHEMA@ibm.gwdg.de (Stefan Schemat)
Newsgroups: alt.sb.programmer
Subject: MIDI output under Win 3.1
Date: 31 Jul 92 12:34:51 GMT
Organization: GWDG, Goettingen

Hi,
does anybody knows how to play a single MIDI note under Win 3.1?
A short sample source text would be great.
Thanx Stefan (SSCHEMA@ibm.gwdg.de)
From: wdc50@duts.ccc.amdahl.com (Winthrop D Chan)
Newsgroups: alt.sb.programmer
Subject: Re: Decoding DTMF tones with sb ? Is it possible ?
Date: 27 Jul 92 19:54:40 GMT
Reply-To: wdc50@DUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Winthrop D Chan)
Distribution: alt
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <LAHIKAIN.92Jul27154518@mamba.lut.fi> lahikain@lut.fi (Mikko Lahikainen) writes:
>
>Has anyone tried to decode dtfm tones (which for example telephones use)
>with sb ? What do you think If it is possible ?
>
>--
>-Lahi-  * lahikain@lut.fi *


Hmmm... That would be kinda neat to do. Be able to decode all 16 DTFM and maybe
even play them back.

Oh oh.... Me thinks this is starting to sound a hell of alot like what they
did with the ole AppleCat modem. :-)

Winthrop Chan
Newsgroups: alt.sb.programmer
Newsgroups: alt.sb.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 15:55:10 -0400 
From: Tom Neuendorffer <tpn+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Non-DMA DAC on SB


Hi,
	I'm working on writing an interface for the SoundBlaster on a Mach
machine. While DMA is obviously the way to go, I am also interested in
how to do a non-dma interface to the DAC. Specifically I need to know.

1. is there an internal FIFO buffer I can write to and , if so, 
	a. How can I write to it?
	b. how can I get the status on how full it is.

If anyone has any technical specs (or public domain code) on this aspect
of the card (or any other for that matter), please let me know. I am in
the process of ordering the developers kit, but I would like to get some
things done now. I have looked around the ftp sources listed in the FAQ,
but have had no luck in finding this info. Also, I have heard of , but
not seen  Sblast_BSD_1.4 (a Sound Blaster BSD Unix device driver by
Steve Haehnichen). If I could get a pointer to that, I would appreciate
it.

Thanks in advance,
	Tom N.
Xref: sparky alt.sb.programmer:294 comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard:895
From: bill@solaria (Bill Neisius)
Newsgroups: alt.sb.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard
Subject: Re: Non-DMA DAC on SB
Date: 30 Jul 92 13:52:02 GMT
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

tpn+@andrew.cmu.edu (Tom Neuendorffer) writes:
: Also, I have heard of , but
: not seen  Sblast_BSD_1.4 (a Sound Blaster BSD Unix device driver by
: Steve Haehnichen). If I could get a pointer to that, I would appreciate
: it.


Host saffron.inset.com   (192.94.75.2)
Last updated 01:37 16 Jul 1992

    Location: /pub/unix/sound_drivers
      FILE      rw-r--r--      6768  Jun 24 19:00   SBlast-BSD-1.4-Read_me
      FILE      rw-r--r--    199335  Jun 24 18:58   SBlast-BSD-1.4.tar.Z

Newsgroups: alt.sb.programmer
From: heathh@cco.caltech.edu (Heath Ian Hunnicutt)
Subject: Re: Decoding DTMF tones with sb ? Is it possible ?
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: alt
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 18:24:36 GMT

venaas@siri.unit.no (Stig Venaas) writes:
>I've made a program that plays 0-9,* and #. I've cheated a bit though.
>I'm using vplay and samples of the touch tones.
>But, I'm writing a new one now, where I generate the tones by driving
>the SB directly. I'm also thinking of incorporating decoding.

>There are two problems which I hope someone can help with.

>1. What are the other 4 DTFMs? I know the freqs for them, but I don't
>   know what they are called. Each consists of two sine waves. There
>   are four choises for each of them. I know all the freqs and I know
>   which pairs 0-9 uses, and I can find out which * and # uses. But
>   not the other 4.

	The others are A,B,C,D the are on the right of the keypad, 
A is at the top, making it a 4x4 grid.
	Why does it matter where they are?  Because DTMF stands
for *Dual* tone multi frequency encoding.  Each column on the keypad
is assigned a frequency, and so is each row.  When a button is pressed,
the frequencies for that row and column are mixed and output.
Thus, "Dual" Tone.  The A-B-C-D column adds only one new frequency to
the keypad, using the four previously available row freqs to mix 
with the new column freq.
	Therefore, you should be able to figure out * and # based
on the info you already have.  Also, most modems support the A-D dial
characters, so you could "ear sample" them that way.

>2. I need some info on how to program the SB in order to sample. I
>   could look into the code for vrec, but it's not an easy way of
>   getting the info.
	Try anon ftp to tybalt.cco.caltech.edu.  Look at
/pub/heathh/sb/INDEX, and the rest should be straightforward.

See ya, Heath

P.S> Line noise is bad today, so please forigve my spelling and justification
troubles.

-- 
On Saturday, April 18, 1992, this .sig became self-aware.
From: venaas@siri.unit.no (Stig Venaas)
Newsgroups: alt.sb.programmer
Subject: Re: Decoding DTMF tones with sb ? Is it possible ?
Date: 28 Jul 92 10:26:14 GMT
Distribution: alt
Organization: University of Trondheim

In article <98=k02aT1b8R01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> wdc50@DUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Winthrop D Chan) writes:
>In article <LAHIKAIN.92Jul27154518@mamba.lut.fi> lahikain@lut.fi (Mikko Lahikainen) writes:
>>
>>Has anyone tried to decode dtfm tones (which for example telephones use)
>>with sb ? What do you think If it is possible ?
>>
>>--
>>-Lahi-  * lahikain@lut.fi *
>
>
>Hmmm... That would be kinda neat to do. Be able to decode all 16 DTFM and maybe
>even play them back.
>
>Oh oh.... Me thinks this is starting to sound a hell of alot like what they
>did with the ole AppleCat modem. :-)
>
>Winthrop Chan

I've made a program that plays 0-9,* and #. I've cheated a bit though.
I'm using vplay and samples of the touch tones.
But, I'm writing a new one now, where I generate the tones by driving
the SB directly. I'm also thinking of incorporating decoding.

There are two problems which I hope someone can help with.

1. What are the other 4 DTFMs? I know the freqs for them, but I don't
   know what they are called. Each consists of two sine waves. There
   are four choises for each of them. I know all the freqs and I know
   which pairs 0-9 uses, and I can find out which * and # uses. But
   not the other 4.

2. I need some info on how to program the SB in order to sample. I
   could look into the code for vrec, but it's not an easy way of
   getting the info.

Stig
Newsgroups: alt.sb.programmer
From: lahikain@lut.fi (Mikko Lahikainen)
Subject: Decoding DTMF tones with sb ? Is it possible ?
Date: 27 Jul 92 15:45:18
Distribution: alt
Organization: Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland


Has anyone tried to decode dtfm tones (which for example telephones use)
with sb ? What do you think If it is possible ?

--
-Lahi-  * lahikain@lut.fi *
From: asslr@acad2.alaska.edu
Newsgroups: alt.sb.programmer
Subject: Programming information
Date: 28 Jul 92 05:11:44 GMT
Organization: University of Alaska

Hi there.  I was hoping someone out there could give me some information on
programming the SB/SBPRO.  I would appreciate ANY information that you have or
could tell me where to find it.  I need addresses and possibly even sample code
for sending output to the card.

I appreciate it very much.

In advance, Thanks.

ASSLR@Acad2.Alaska.Edu
Newsgroups: alt.true-crime