From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Subject: Re: Twist my words, twist your words,..., (Re: to Howard Black ...)
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 16:28:16 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <19DEC199221242808@zeus.tamu.edu> Zeke@homo.is.the.way.to.go.to.get.a.piece.of.pucker.hole.edu writes:

>..... all posts made with a Pro Hetero tone have had an immediate
>backlash of Anti-Hetero replies whilst the other posts were basically ignorred.
>Why is this, why do the PRO HOMO (i.e. anti-hetero) people that posted
>replies only respond to the pro hetero arguments??

    Pro-Hetero, according to your posts, equals anti-gay.  Fortunately,
many hets do not share this equation.  Personally, I'm as pro-hetero as I
am pro-gay.  You seem to buy into this "either you're pro-gay or pro het"
stance.  Pretty limiting.  Extremely immature.

>Any one who agrees that a racial issue and a sexual orientation issue are
>equivalent is a fucking idiot (i.e. you Rob)!   

    "Profanity is the attempt of a feeble mind to express itself forcibly"
- Mark Twain.  Name-calling just makes it worse.  I assume that anyone who
doesn't agree with you is a fucking idiot?


>     If I am PRO HETERO, and if PRO HETEROs do what I d, then they can and
>will take the same bullshit PRO HOMO propaganda, re-word with respect to the 
>PRO HETERO movement and make the HETEROsexual population look as if it is

    "Pro-hetero movement" - who comprises that?  You, Helms, Robertson,
Falwell, et al.?

>being discriminated against by all those nasty icky poo homos, necros,
>bestiality creeps. Thus showing that any anti-discrimination legislation is

    Your attempted equation of gayness with necrophilia, bestiality,
pedophilia, etc. just makes you look dumb.  Not even the majority of
homophobes who post around here agree with this.

>about as effective as the Sodomy laws in various states. But you are too
>blinded by your emotionalism to realize this! I pity you for it.

>     NOW you attack any group that has anyreligious tenants of morality.
>What is the matter now?  Rob, you have already shown that YOUR brand of
>PRO HOMO is really ANTI-HETERO.

    Talk about people in glass houses...

>No Rob, you cannot see the FUCKING point that I am making. I do not

    He sees it, I'm sure, as clearly as I do.  It's just that the point
you're making is emotional, illogical, and hateful.

>give a damn what people "have said" about whether or not they choose to be
>a necro, homo, beasty-boy,and/or pedophile etc. If you trust the psychological
>studies that have been done and take them as concrete and unbending evidence
>that sexual orientation is not a choice, then how does a society deal with
>the pedophiles that fuck our children (should they be put in jail because
>of their preference, should they see psychiatric help for their sickness?)

    As said above, gays are not necessarily pedophiles.  According to the
last survey I saw, 97% of child molestations are perpetrated by hets.  That
means that hets are more likely to be pedophiles, even in relative terms.

>You have accused me of being a biggotttteedd, republican, member of the K.K.K.
>while being a homophobic, ignorant, anti-jew, anti-black puckered asshole.

    Poor thing....entirely undeserved appelations, I know.  But, for the
record, Rob has not stooped to the childish name-calling levels you have.

>Now lets Face it ROB you are a disgrace to any HOMOsexual and his cause because
>you are judgmental, emotionally unstable, vindictive, and hyper-sensitive.

    In your opinion.  A rational person could not avoid calling you
judgemental.  The other adjectives definitely do not apply to Rob's posts,
but apply very well to yours.

>I pity you for it! (you should seek some therapy!!!)

    You seem to be suggesting therapy quite often.  Perhaps you should seek
some yourself, and ask about "projection".

>Very interesting paragraph for you have summed up your type of PRO HOMO way of
>thinking. Again you assume that I am a gay basher, you assume my arguments
>are trash and you try to shut me up. 

    No assumption necessary.  Look at your stupid sig, for a start.

>But Until you have reached that higher echelon of thinking that is above
>your PRO HOMO, PRO HETERO, PRO THIS, PRO THAT biases, I will continue
>to haunt you with your own limited logic.

    More projection.  I agree with Rob...you'll go away sooner or later,
and be replaced by another spewing homophobe without the balls to use his
real name.

-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ.