From: bill@cognet.ucla.edu (William M. Eldridge)
Subject: Re: Bill Clinton denies being in the loop
Organization: UCLA Cognitive Science Research Program
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 21:20:29 GMT

ck347@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Richard A. Mulac) writes:


>  Led by Senator Dole, the media revealed this weekend evidence of a
>smoking gun linking "independant" counsel Walsh to the Clinton Campaign.
>A Clinton press release concerning the new indictment levied against
>Weinberger by Walsh on Friday, October 30, was dated October 29, 1992!
>Bill Clinton refused to comment, while his staff used the excuse that the
>date on the release had been a typographical error.  RIGHT!  And Richard
>Nixon "accidentally" erased some of the tapes.  As further proof of their
>subversion of the Constitution, here is their own e-mail release (again a
>typographical error?).

>  Here is documented proof that Walsh and his stooges were working hand 
>in hand with CG/92, giving them inside information and probably handing 
>out indictments on orders from the campaign!  So now we know that Walsh 
>was a collaborator with Clinton and the Democrats to gain control of the 
>White House.  Is it too early to talk "impeachment"?  I think Congress
>should appoint a special counsel to investigate special counsel Walsh.

Oh what a baby you are.  Reagan and Bush have stonewalled on this
issue for 6 fucking years, shredding records, deleting files, and
indictments were lost because of struck deals with Congress.

Yes it was politics.  Yes it deserved to be.  Yes Bush got thrown out
on his ass.  But isn't holding up this vital piece of evidence deceiving
the people of the U.S.?  Don't we have a right to know that Weinberger's
notes contradict Bush's sworn testimony?  So Clinton's folks pulled
a fast one. This is war.  Tell me the Moscow stuff wasn't digging in
as well.  

Face it.  Bush lost.  Go cry somewhere and dream of a future indictment.
Go FAR FAR AWAY.

P.S.  While you're there, read a book about Reagan/Bush politics in
Central America, and come back only if you learn something (like
how many innocents we helped slaughter while undermining the evil
Sandanistas.)

This doesn't apply just to you personally - it's to all "you people"
who've had your fun with very imperfect candidates, and now you expect
the opposition to live up to standards you never expected from your
own choices.  

P.P.S. Does it make you happy that Reagan, North, Bush, Weinberger
and Poindexter have been able to lie with smiling faces at the public
for years, saying "we can wage a war anywhere we fucking want to, and
if you try to stop us, we'll use every spy organization we have to
make you look stupid?"  Is this less bothersome to you than the
opposition party slyly RELEASING THE FACTS FROM A $40 MILLION DOLLAR
INVESTIGATION? DON'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO GET SOMETHING TIMELY FROM
OUR GODDAMN MONEY THAN AN INDICTMENT FROM REAGAN SAYING, "I really
don't remember", AND GETTING POST_MORTEM INDICTMENTS OF EVERY PERSON
INVOLVED?

If there's anyone to blame for the timing, it's BUSH - all of this
should have been out in the open years ago.  So fuck him.  He's 
history, and he won't pull this shit anymore.

Got any more self-righteous accusations?
-- 
{{{{ bill eldridge                                       x                }}}}
{{{{ bill@cognet.ucla.edu    310-206-3960               xxx              }}}}
{{{{ ~more, ~better, ~faster [80's motto]                x              }}}}
{{{{ ~hot, ~toxic, and ~shallow [90's motto]                              }}}}
Xref: sparky alt.politics.elections:23214 talk.politics.misc:59105