HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Michael S. Shappe <mss1@cornell.edu>
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Proposed startrek split
Date: 23 Jan 1993 18:57:03 GMT
Organization: Cornell University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: cu-dialup-0210.cit.cornell.edu
X-UserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d16
X-XXMessage-ID: <A78700C7B903EC34@cu-dialup-0210.cit.cornell.edu>
X-XXDate: Sat, 23 Jan 93 19:03:51 GMT

In article <1jqa2sINNnas@gap.caltech.edu> Timothy W. Lynch,
tlynch@cco.caltech.edu writes:
>Not completely.  Yes, everything is in shades of grey, but not *that*
many.
>There are discussions that are *definitely* worth following, ones that 
>definitely are not, and ones that might be.  However, r.a.s.reviews would
>appeal to those people for whom group 1 is small and group 3 is huge,
*regard-
>less* of the size of group 2.  Trust me, I know whence I speak.

This is the primary reason I've created Trek-Review-L and am now shutting
up about any oppositon to a rec.arts.startrek.reviews...it suddenly
occurred to me that 90% of r.a.s.current was crud, and the remaining 10%
was mostly reviews :-)

>>Either way, it isn't
>>helpful in stimulating interest in Star Trek or in gaining additional
>>viewership for the show.
>
>I think this is needlessly idealistic.  R.a.s.* isn't around for the
purpose
>of "gaining additional viewership for the show";

Indeed. Evangelism is the worst reason for a newsgroup. If you want to
spread the Gospel of Trek, start a soc.religion.startrek.

>Given the current environment on r.a.s.current?  Pardon me if I disagree
>with *that* assertion.  Some of it is intriguing, but most of it is not.

Much like TNG this season, actually :-) I wonder if the two are related...

But I digress...

Mikey
From: hades@coos.dartmouth.edu (Brian Hughes)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: comp.sys.mac.powerbook
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:42:50 GMT
Reply-To: hades@Dartmouth.Edu
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Disclaimer: Personally, I really don't care who you think I speak for.
Moderator: Rec.Arts.Comics.Info

jas@ISI.EDU (Jeff Sullivan) writes:

>In article <1993Jan20.222613.10056@iscsvax.uni.edu> perdue4575@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:

>>I support a newsgroup on the Macintosh Powerbooks. It'd save me
>>a lot of time sifting through all the articles in the other 
>>sections.

>I agree.  There are a lot of concerns about PowerBooks that no other
>Mac CPU has, and separating them would be a boon.

    Yes you are correct. There are many issues that concern Powerbook
owners, as well as owners of other laptop class machines. That is why
there is a comp.sys.laptop. But I see no reason that there should be
another newsgroup to cover this topic. Why is comp.sys.laptop not
considered sufficient?
--
-Brian V. Hughes 
"December 1 - What begins as a friendly transitional get-together between
 the Bushes and the Clintons ends in tragedy when Millie ralphs up what
 is later identified as Socks the cat." Dave Barry 1992 Year in Review
From: hades@coos.dartmouth.edu (Brian Hughes)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: RFD: comp.sys.mac.powerbook
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:32:51 GMT
Reply-To: hades@Dartmouth.Edu
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Disclaimer: Personally, I really don't care who you think I speak for.
Moderator: Rec.Arts.Comics.Info

ssbc+@andrew.cmu.edu (Sam Swett) writes:

>	I fully support the idea and creation of this newsgroup. Let's get it
>going! I think it follows naturally from the groups which already exist,
>and would alleviate the filtering of relevant PowerBook-related messages
>and discussions on other groups.

    Follows naturally? You can look at comp.sys.mac.apps, c.s.m.system,
c.s.m.databases, c.s.m.hypercard, and c.s.m.programmer and tell me that
c.s.m.powerbook fits naturally? Not to mention c.s.m.wanted,
c.s.m.games, and c.s.m.advocacy.

--
-Brian V. Hughes 
"December 1 - What begins as a friendly transitional get-together between
 the Bushes and the Clintons ends in tragedy when Millie ralphs up what
 is later identified as Socks the cat." Dave Barry 1992 Year in Review
Newsgroups: news.groups
From: tilley@fsf.UUCP (Tom Tilley)
Subject: Re: RFD: RENAME several groups to rec.outdoors.*
Reply-To: tilley@sunfse.ese.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 20:31:21 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.171403.23832@ncar.ucar.edu> ilana@kiowa.scd.ucar.edu (Ilana Stern) writes:
>In article <1jvvolINNeq1@rodan.UU.NET>, Tim Rigg <rigg@osnome.che.wisc.edu> writes:
>>                         REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION
>> 
>> ...
>> In addition, obvious outdoors.* groups should be moved to that
>> hierarchy: rec.boats, rec.boats.paddle, rec.climbing, rec.scuba, 
>> rec.skiing, rec.skydiving, rec.windsurfing, rec.hunting.

I'm trying to imagine "rec.indoors.skydiving", and "rec.indoors.hunting"!
I don't see any ambiguity that needs to be cleared up by adding ".outdoors"
to the group names.

> ...   I would argue, though, that the
>denizens of each of these existing groups should make the call 
>individually -- that there should be no grand renaming vote.)

The guidelines (tm) require the vote be group-by-group (though the CFV
can be unified).  If this ever makes it to a vote, I'll abstain on the
groups I don't read (leaving me to vote NO on rec.outdoors.backcountry (!),
rec.outdoors.climbing, and rec.outdoors.skiing.

>> Second, should rec.backcountry be renamed and modified to include
>> subgroups?  It seems that splitting rec.backcountry might be a good
>> idea.

Why?

>I am opposed to splitting rec.backcountry.  The traffic is low enough
>that anyone with a decent newsreader can cope.  Camping, backpacking,
>and hiking all overlap to such a degree that splitting these topics
>would be counterproductive.

I agree (both points).

I missed some articles a few weeks ago due to some news problems here.
I probably missed it, but I have never seen anyone post a reason for
splitting rec.backcountry  (a group that, IMO, works fairly well and
qualifies for the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" rule).  Does anyone
actually favor splitting r.b, and if so, why?

>  The only split I could see being marginally
>worthwhile would be rec.backcountry.equipment (for discussion of tents,
>stoves, packs, boots, etc.) and I would probably vote against that
>anyway.

While equipment posts don't interest me, I see no reason for a seperate
group for them (and would oppose its creation).  The traffic is low enough
that hitting "n" or "k" as appropriate is not a problem.

>...  I hope that those of you who agree with me will take the opportunity
>to post your thoughts to news.groups.  

Done.

Tom,
who reads rec.climbing, and reads and posts to rec.backcountry and
rec.skiing, and plans to vote no on the renaming and the split.
#--------------------------------------------------#
| Tom Tilley                                       |
| Internet : tilley@sunfse.ese.lmsc.lockheed.com   |
From: jaapjl@tab00.larc.nasa.gov (J Lee Jaap)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Missing subjects (Re: <None>)
Date: 27 Jan 1993 16:13:05 GMT
Organization: AS&M Inc
	<1993Jan17.182646.1@cc.helsinki.fi>
	<C1A4yI.4Kw@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Reply-To: J Lee Jaap <J.L.Jaap@larc.nasa.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cmb00.larc.nasa.gov
In-reply-to: jacobus@symphony.cc.purdue.edu's message of 22 Jan 93 23:51:53 GMT

In article <C1A4yI.4Kw@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> jacobus@symphony.cc.purdue.edu (Bryan J. Maloney) writes:

   In article <1993Jan17.182646.1@cc.helsinki.fi> essandor@cc.helsinki.fi writes:
   >This is a group whose aims and objectives are appropriate for our world of
   >today. A group which would cross all social, cultural economic and political
   >boundaries, a group of concern. This group must be welcomed into being.



   I might also add that it also crosses temporal boundaries.  My direct
   patrilineal ancestor was a forced migrant from Ireland in the last century.


   Exile, "rousting out the natives", "resettlement", "movement to reservations",
   "ethnic cleansing" (a particularly nasty euphemism, that--who would be opposed
   to any sort of "cleansing", after all?), etc.  All seem to have existed
   throughout history.

Huh?  What group?  I don't see any group mentioned.

Yes I could go up the thread, _if_ the parents aren't expired already.

PLEASE USE THE SUBJECT HEADER.
--
J Lee Jaap <J.L.Jaap@LaRC.NASA.Gov> +1 804/864-2148
    employed by, not speaking for, AS&M Inc, at
         NASA LaRC, Hampton VA 23681-0001
Newsgroups: news.groups
From: ggraham@utdallas.edu (GREGORY S GRAHAM)
Subject: Re: RFD: comp.sys.mac.powerbook
Organization: Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:00:09 GMT

I think a Powerbook newsgroup is a great idea for three reasons:

   1) The Macintosh newsgroups are very large,

   2) Powerbook users represent a large subgroup of Macintosh users, and

   3) The Powerbook presents unique issues that are not relevant to the
      desktop Macintosh world.
-- 

Greg Graham                                ggraham@utdallas.edu

Newsgroups: news.groups,soc.culture.indian,rec.arts.poems,soc.culture.karnataka
From: kherron@ms.uky.edu (Kenneth Herron)
Subject: Re: News Groups Censors REC.ARTS.POEMS.URDU
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 13:54:43 GMT

an6966@anon.penet.fi writes:

>I wish to state that I am VERY ANGRY at the annoucenemtn that News Groups
>censored rec.arts.poems.urdu despite its passing fair and square in a
>valid vote.  

Considering that you're posting anonymously, who cares?
-- 
Kenneth Herron                                            kherron@ms.uky.edu
University of Kentucky                                       +1 606 257 2975
Dept. of Mathematics "Your ball goes over them, it sails off the edge into a
huge cauldren of fire-breathing dragons."  "And they call this a par three?"
From: rrdjro@minyos.xx.rmit.OZ.AU (Jonathan O'Donnell)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.games.miniatures (Btech & WHammer)
Keywords: miniatures figures ancients napoleonics renaissance naval
Date: 28 Jan 93 06:34:25 GMT
Organization: RMIT Computer Centre
NNTP-Posting-Host: minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au

Would this (or should this) group include discussion about the non-   
traditional minitures games such as Battletech, War Hammer, 
War Hammer 40,000, etc?

	Jonathan@RMIT.edu.au
From: rzsj@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: RFD: rec.games.miniatures
Date: 26 Jan 93 22:33:30 EST
Distribution: news
Organization: Cornell University

     This is a great idea.  I would really like to talk about painting
styles and such.  I vote Yes!

-SHONE
From: adams@spss.com (Steve Adams)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: re: RFD soc.religion.christian.bible-study - Naming comments
Date: 26 Jan 93 16:24:56 GMT
Organization: SPSS Inc.


We're just about ready to post a CFV for soc.religion.christian.bible-study.

The group who has been working though the RFD and charter have discussed
tha name issue again (as we did once before) and we think the CFV should
go forward, with the 'christian' part of the name included.

Clearly, the majority of postings and the basic thrust of the group will 
concern the 'Christian' Bible, ie, the Old and New Testaments.  As the 
charter states, we will NOT exclude views from any person or group that 
is on topic, but think that the name reflects what will actually be going 
on in the group.

The underlying assumptions will be of a Christian bent.  Again, this is not
to exclude or demean any person's views.  It simply gives the underlying
assumptions about the exegetical and critical methods and reference points 
for the topic at hand.  Those who wish to aproach from other traditions,
exegetics or critical methods know what the assumptions are and that more
explanation may be required...

The CFV should be posted shortly...discussion on the issue has died down,
and no articles on the issue have arrived in the last 3 days.  Thus, it
seems time to call for the vote.

 -Steve
--
  The opinions expressed above are those of the author and not SPSS, Inc.
                         -------------------
   adams@spss.com                                  Phone: (312) 329-3522
   Steve Adams        "Space-age cybernomad"       Fax:   (312) 329-3558
From: geoffb@coos.dartmouth.edu (Geoff Bronner)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: rec.arts.startrek.reviews: proposed moderator, crossposting
Date: 29 Jan 93 00:53:01 GMT
Reply-To: geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU
Organization: Amos Tuck School
Disclaimer: I don't represent Dartmouth and Dartmouth doesn't represent me.

In <1k9g7uINN6g2@gaia.ucs.orst.edu> stanley@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU (John Stanley) writes:

>Will you please make up your mind? In a previous posting, you said
>"poster's option to crosspost". Now you are back at mandatory
>crossposting.

The proposed wording of the charter hasn't been changed along those lines
yet. The basic idea of doing so was just thrown on the table.
Instead of insisting on instant gratification why not provide an argument
in support of automatic vs requested crossposting? Why not provide some
alternate wording for that section of the proposed charter? In short, be
constructive instead of whining.

>There is absolutely no benefit to mandating crossposting. There is
>benefit to not crosspost. By not mandating crossposting, you can
>increase the benfits and not decrease anything.

That covers your opinion but doesn't provide any reasoning. Would you care
to provide an alternative to the current wording of the proposed charter?

-Geoff
--
geoffb@Dartmouth.EDU - Computing Support Consultant, Tuck School of Business

                     "My heros don't appear on no stamps."
                                -Public Enemy
Newsgroups: news.groups
From: mrr1@Ra.MsState.Edu (mark r rauschkolb)
Subject: Re: RFD: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware reorganizati
Reply-To: mrr1@Ra.MsState.Edu
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:15:31 GMT

>
>Some people have already suggested this:
>
>comp.sys.x86.video
>
>comp.sys.x86.drive
>
>comp.sys.x86.hardware (motherboard etc)
>
What would this do for the PS/2 groups?  

Would they be "added" into this mix, or get a comp.sys.x86.microchannel?

Mark


Newsgroups: news.groups
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: do not rename rec.skiing
Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Stuff and Nonsense Division
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 05:33:41 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.170412.19181@irfu.se> mw@irfu.se (Mattias Waldenvik) writes:

>	Agreed! Redundant unless there is a rec.indoors.skiing ...

If that's the case, then isn't the "rec" part of it redundant as well?

(This isn't a defense of the proposal in question, but simply of
hierarchy in general.)

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /               Rocks say goodbye.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
From: paulbe@castle.ed.ac.uk (Paul Bedworth)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: RFD - comp.cs.undergrad
Date: 25 Jan 93 14:20:21 GMT
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Edinburgh University

------ start of forwarded text ----------------------------------------

Received: from ncl.ac.uk by castle.ed.ac.uk id aa01560; 25 Jan 93 8:37 WET
Received: from tuda.ncl.ac.uk by cheviot.ncl.ac.uk id <AA01650@cheviot.ncl.ac.uk>
  (5.65cVUW/NCL-CMA.1.35 for <paulbe@castle.ed.ac.uk>) with SMTP; Mon, 25 Jan 1993 02:57:45 GMT
From: Simon A Robbie <d1js56%tuda@uk.ac.ncl>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 02:57:43 GMT
Message-Id: <AA13806.199301250257@tuda.ncl.ac.uk>
To: paulbe@uk.ac.ed.castle
Subject: Usenet posting for comp.cs.undergrad
Status: REO


A most excellent idea.  Waves of approval.

--
Simon

2nd Year Honours Computer Scientist at the University of Durham

------ end of forwarded text -----------------------------------
Newsgroups: news.groups
From: guiguizi@kodak.kodak.com (Paul Guiguizian x79315/AT/2-49-KP)
Subject: Re: RFD: comp.os.nt
Keywords: Microsoft Windows NT Win32
Organization: Eastman Kodak Company
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 22:26:04 GMT


I vote for comp.windows.nt

NT is really an operating system hiding under the Win32 interface...

Ben Steele@sun1ais.kodak.com

Xref: sparky news.groups:26402 comp.sys.mac.misc:22404
From: dave@frackit.UUCP (Dave Ratcliffe)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: PowerBook Newsgroup
Date: 26 Jan 93 23:33:47 GMT
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Data Factory Services, Harrisburg, Pa.


 In article <C17ts3.4Au@unix.amherst.edu>, twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
 >In article <CARLTON.93Jan20204954@scws8.harvard.edu> carlton@scws8.harvard.edu (david carlton) writes:
 > 
 >>In article <C165MD.7qq@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, hades@coos.dartmouth.edu (Hades) writes:
 >>
 >>> Until the original poster has an approved RFD for the group, there
 >>> should be no talk about in news.groups.
 >>
 >>Why not?  People often send out feelers in news.groups before
 >>submitting an official RFD.
 > 
 >Because Joel Furr is likely to descend upon them and give them holy
 >hell, short-circuiting any useful pre-RFD discussion that might come
 >of it.

Is it true that Joel Furr is really Dave Hayes on anebolic (sp?) steroids?

-- 
 vogon1!compnect!frackit!dave@psuvax1.psu.edu            |  Dave Ratcliffe  |
 - or - ..uunet!wa3wbu!frackit!dave                      |  Sys. <*> Admin. |
                                                         | Harrisburg,  Pa. |
From: popba@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr S Sorasuchart)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: soc.culture.malaysia
Date: 22 Jan 1993 15:29:43 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: yarrow.csv.warwick.ac.uk


The group soc.culture.asean should be renamed, instead it should be discussed the
topic within the ASEAN, such as the AFTA or the others withing the ASEAN
Co-opretion. Eventually, there is APEC Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation exist.
This newsgroup can be useful for the other purpose. Most of netters were using
for their own countries more than ASEAN. 

SAWANIT
Newsgroups: news.groups
From: mohang@netcom.com (Mohan Gopalakrishnan)
Subject: Call for discussion to form newsgroup soc.history.southasia
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 08:05:57 GMT


                         Call for discussion on forming NewsGroup
                         ----------------------------------------
                                     -SOC.HISTORY.SOUTHASIA
                                      ---------------------
            Anyway, I would be very much interested in pushing for
 a group dedicated to the discussion of S ASIAN history(which is
 roughly the region encompassing India,Pakistan,Bangladesh,Sri-Lanka,
 Bhutan, Nepal, Afghanistan and the Maldives). It would be nice if
 the group could be moderated(dont know the procedure for that either).
 We would be discussing different historical periods and perspectives
 in south asian history. While history itself is a political subject,
 it would be nice if uninformed politically motivated half truths as
 we see in the "CULTURE" groups can be excluded by moderation. This 
 is such that the group be dedicated to the discussion of history
 alone. If the group has a goal or objective, it is to enlighten
 ourselves with a better understanding od S ASIAN HISTORY thro mutual
 help.
                       -Mohan
Newsgroups: news.groups
From: richarm@a.cs.okstate.edu (MCINTYRE RICHARD D)
Subject: Re: RFD: comp.databases.object
Organization: Oklahoma State University, Computer Science, Stillwater
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 19:35:42 GMT

ISSUES

>The following questions should be resolved during the discussion:

>1.  Is the name "comp.databases.object" the best one?
It caught my attention quickly and seems descriptive enough.
I'd say go with it.

>2.  Should the new group come under the comp.databases hierarchy at
>    all, or would it be better placed under comp.object?
It it's going to exist, then comp.databases is where it belongs.

>3.  What should our attitude be toward vendor publicity?  (This
>    should be a guideline only, since we probably don't want a
>    moderated group -- but we can consider that too, if desired.)
Don't moderate it.  There aren't that many commercial ODBMS's 
or other similar products right now that would make that a problem
at this stage.

>4.  Would there be enough contributors (and not just readers) to the
>    new group to warrant its creation?
This is the most difficult of your questions to guess.  For my
part, I'd like to see it.  I can understand those who believe it
still belongs under research, but the concepts involved are
becomming more concrete.  There are still some questions that
have more to do with theory than implementation.  But, IMO there's
enough work going on here to justify trying the group out.

A lot of the discussions would likely center on ODBMS design using
specific OOP languages.  For my own part, I'm working on
implementing a Persistent Object Manager in C++ to handle
Template-based Container objects which may contain other persistent
objects.  Many of my questions relate to efficiency of a
particular design.  Additionally, I would like to see some
discussions on specific methods of insuring referential integrity.

If the group is going to be unmoderated, which I believe it should be,
then I'd guess that a lot of the postings would be better addressed
to comp.lang."language-of-choice".
 
Still, there are some language specific problems that often arise
while working on ODBMS's.  comp.databases.object would be a good
location to discuss these issues.

You've got one vote for the group here.  At least to give it a try.

-- 
Name :		    Dallas McIntyre
Occupation :	    Student - Still looking for a "real" job.
Favorite Far Side : Tarzan Introducing Himself to Jane.
Email Address :	    richarm@a.cs.okstate.edu
From: KLEBAN@MAINE.MAINE.EDU (Peter Kleban)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Renaming rec.boats.paddle
Date: 25 Jan 93 20:45:02 GMT
Organization: University of Maine System

Isn't it ong enough already?
Xref: sparky news.groups:26361 soc.culture.indian:45498 rec.arts.poems:14028
From: uipooper@bcars123.bnr.ca (UI Pooper 2)
Newsgroups: news.groups,soc.culture.indian,rec.arts.poems,soc.culture.karnataka
Subject: Re: Super computers from India...way to GO guys
Date: 26 Jan 93 15:36:45 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: bnr.ca

They say success breeds success. I hope much new ideas/products
will come from India. The birth control vaccine was one such
idea (scientists in West said no can do!!). The integrated Missile
program (led by very able Dr. Kamal) was another success story for		
Indian Defence labs. Also many people are not aware, the very strategic
northern Corps in Jammu & Kashmir was commanded by General "Sammy" Khan.
My brother who served under him said he was totally outstanding.
I hope some a day a Muslim can become the Commander-in-Chief of the
Indian Army (this will be another of the great idea for secularism).
From: at626@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dave Strout)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: PB Newsgroup
Date: 21 Jan 1993 09:08:06 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: at626@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dave Strout)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I would very much appreciate a powerbook newsgroup.

dave.
-- 
Dave Strout          <at626@cleveland.freenet.edu>
"Thompson's Rule for First Time Telescope Makers:
It is faster to make a four-inch mirror then a six-inch
mirror than to make a six-inch mirror."
From: Michael S. Shappe <mss1@cornell.edu>
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Proposal: TREK-REVIEW-L
Date: 23 Jan 1993 01:35:44 GMT
Organization: Cornell University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: cu-dialup-0101.cit.cornell.edu
X-UserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d16
X-XXMessage-ID: <A7860CB1E301EC0B@cu-dialup-0101.cit.cornell.edu>
X-XXDate: Fri, 22 Jan 93 01:42:25 GMT

Update: Interested parties should look for my announcement in
rec.arts.startrek.current and rec.arts.startrek.misc (and soon, if Jim
obliges, rec.arts.startrek.info, as well).

The upshot is, a TREK-REVIEW-L@cornell.edu has been created. PLEASE DO
NOT ASK ME TO ADD YOU TO IT, but rather read the announcement and learn
from that how to add yourself to the list.

Thank you, one and all

/mss1
Newsgroups: news.groups