HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mazzarel@spam.berkeley.edu (Ariel Mazzarelli)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: YOU MAKE THE CALL
Date: 6 Nov 1992 23:10:58 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Math. Department.
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: spam.berkeley.edu

In article <1deblrINN1mf@fido.asd.sgi.com> coolidge@speaker.wpd.sgi.com (Don Coolidge) writes:
>
>(Ariel, you're a very nasty woman. My compliments!)

Yeah,  the moustache,  hairy legs,  and testosterone make me a very nasty 
woman indeed.

On the other hand,  I like to think I'm a pretty nice man.  :)

Ariel
PS:  I do have my moments,  though.  In 1987,  I was staying at my parents' 
house in LA,  when a woman knocked on the door.  When I answered,  she began
to tell me that she was selling tickets to a function--and and she was saying
this she opened a photobook and there was Herschensohn's face.  He is well
known in SoCal since he's on channel 7 news, spouting the usual racist
xenophobic crap of the Dornan/Buchanan wing.  I looked her in the eye,  
interrupted her little sales pitch,  and said:  "I think that guy is an
asshole.  Stop wasting my time."  Then I closed the door on her face.

So you weenies from Lousiana better not come by to tell me how much better it
would be if Herschensohn got elected here.  You just keep trying to get good
ol' David Duke's career going,  ok?
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Weekly Reader wrong! Who else?
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 23:33:21 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
Distribution: na
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


nittmo@buhub.bradley.edu (Christopher Taylor) writes:

> mitch@seashell.seas.ucla.edu (Robert R. Mitchell (SEAS admin)) writes:

> >Not this time.  Vikings won, Bush lost.  But hearing about the prediction
> >was enough to make me root for the (gasp!) Chicago Bears.

> Me too--I can't stand the Bears and I thought I may have to root for them 
> to win.

Mike Ditka was quoted before the election as saying that he'd leave the
country if Clinton was elected. Do you suppose he's started packing yet?

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: After 4 years, a good nights sleep...
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 11:58:53 EST
Organization: Monsoon Software, Inc.

popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell) writes:

> Blackmun is also had some health problems and is expected to leave in the 
> near future.  Stevens is 78 years old.  4 or 5 Justices is not at all 
> impossible for Clinton to put on the court in the next 4 years.  And it 
> also nauseating to think that 70% of all federal justices were placed on 
> the bench by Reagan and Bush.  Not to mention some there by the grace of 
> Ford and Nixon.

I think that Clinton will probably get to appoint 3 Supreme Court justices
(replacing Blackmun, Stevens and White) during a four year term; 5 (adding
O'Conner and Rehnquist), during an eight year term. Although it is
sickening that 70% of the federal judiciary has been appointed in the
last 12 years, you can take some solace in the fact that the Clinton
administration will get to appoint 12% of the federal judiciary in its
first year alone.

Sunil Gupta
Monsoon Software, Inc.
sg@monsoon.com
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Actual Dan Quayle Interview
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 09:34:21 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


In articlKEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick) writes:

> erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) says:

> >I don't think Dan would allow himself to be interviewed by a reporter
> >who was less sympathetic to his political viewpoint, someone who wouldn't
> >toss him softballs so he could appear to hit home runs. But then again,

> You think Chris Wallace is overly sympathetic to the Quayles' viewpoint?
> He interviewed them a couple months ago on ABC, and asked some tougher
> questions.

That was different; that was during the campaign. Dan could hardly duck
all the tough ones for the whole campaign. Now he can choose who he'll
give interviews to, and you can bet it won't be anyone hostile to him.

> I certainly don't think Dan is sick of the media.

Really? That's funny; what has he been saying about it for the last
year? Oh, I see ... it's the Republican media that's "OK".

> >> "The Reagan Revolution ended on Tuesday, not because it was overwhelmed by
> >> a superior army of counter-revolutionaries, but because the fight had gone
> >> out of its soldiers, and its heir, George Bush, did not truly believe in it.

> >This is of course totally incorrect. This election was decided quite

> No, it -is- correct.  Bush abandoned everything Reagan had done, and that's
> why he failed.

Yeah, right. Just keep telling yourself that; you'll find yourself outside
looking in four years from now too.

> >some time ago, when it became obvious to a large number of the working
> >people in the electorate that the "Reagan revolution" had failed to
> >provide the economic security that it had promised them.

> When Bush ended 'Reaganomics', the economy went south.  No surprise.

No, the economy went south because of the $3 trillion debt racked up
in the last 12 years, and the fact that supply-side economics (otherwise
known as 'Reaganomics', trickle-down, or voodoo economics) failed to
provide the private sector investment that it promised. It was bound
to happen, and it happened on Bush's watch. So as a practioner of it
for 12 years he takes the blame, just like he tried to take the credit
for ending the cold war, even though that was a 45 year bipartisan effort.
By the way, Reagan's reputation has suffered considerably recently,
and rightly so.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Top 10 reasons Dan's Fans post here
Date: 12 Nov 92 06:18:53 GMT

Wow, a couple of these were almost funny... I was surprised.
But you ain't no Letterman.

In article <1992Nov10.195740.5606@netcom.com>, madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi
Hausmann) says:

>TOP TEN REASONS DAN QUAYLE'S SUPPORTERS POST TO ALT.FAN.DAN-QUAYLE

>[Same old stuff...]

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis)
Subject: Re: All I have to say
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 08:28:39 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.155246.6682@rock.concert.net> toddwall@rock.concert.net (R. Todd Wall -- Catholic Diocese of Raleigh -- Computer Services) writes:
>In article <1992Nov6.150207.6560@unislc.uucp> jag@unislc.uucp (John Ganske) writes:
>>
>etc.etc.etc
>>p.s. Seek some counseling
>>
>
>I think the name of this group should be changed from alt.fan.dan-quayle to 
>			ALT.BASH.DAN-QUAYLE 
>
>This title seems more appropriate.
>

Yes, since that is what is going on here for the most part.  A bunch of
bullies picking on a decent, honest and intelligent, yes I said intellignet,
man who cares greatly for his country.  A man who does not deserve to be
treated with such blatant disrespect.  Unfortunately, such men are easy
targets of the media, and other bullies, who, apparently, get great pleasure
from picking on a man who doesn't fit their ill-shaped mould.  These people
who have, unmercifully, picked on Vice President Quayle since he was chosen
as Presiden Bush's running mate, are yet the very same people who become
upset, and offended, when anyone picks on their favorite politicians or 
their ideals.  They apparently can dish it out, but they can't take it.

Well, all I have to say is that what's good for the goose is good for the
gander! 


-- 
Robert D. Davis            |  VAX/VMS is a text-only adventure game.  If       
rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu  !  you win, you get to use UNIX.  If you fail, 
uunet!mystica!rdd          |  you get to use an IBM-PC running MeSsy-DOS
Telephone: 1-410-744-7964  !  with MeSsy-Windows or an Apple Macintosh.  
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: carlson@cwis.unomaha.edu (Brian D. Carlson)
Subject: Integrity
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 03:31:59 GMT

	Charles Dickens spelled potato with an 'e' on the end.

	I guess people aren't ready for a man with integrity in public
office. Dan Quayle will go down in history as a man who didn't sell out his
convictions for special interest. It seems that people aren't ready for that,
hence the election of Bill Clinton.

	When you think of all Dan has endured for the last four years, I
don't know of many men (or women) who could have taken the useless abuse
that Quayle has taken. When you think of Gore and Clinton being about the
same age as Quayle, and I haven't heard pokes at them for not being over 
fifty and in the Oval office.

	When Clinton spelled Capital in an official government memo, where
were the English teacher journalists to pounce on him for it?

	Gore thinks the internal combustion engine is public enemy number
one (yet he rode the campain bus) and nobody barbs at him for his lunacy.

	Clinton made a lot of promises about what he'd do for us in the first
hundred days of office, and now he's saying 'let's not get our hopes up,
I can't perform miracles'

	I guess I just wonder when the biased press is going to hold the
same standards up against the people they set up in office.

brian d carlson
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Complete this sentence
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 19:22:25 CST
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

rdosser@UTKUX1.UTK.EDU (rdosser) writes:

> In article <TaF1TB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> elendil@mintir.new-orleans
> >ronnie@cisco.com (Ronnie B. Kon) writes:
> >
> >> My bet for '96: Quayle/Kassenbaum.  Not willing to bet too much on the VP
> >> selection, but I'm willing to bet a fair amount that Our Man Dan will be
> >> the nominee.  He's spent four years doing favors for Republicans all over
> >> the country, and they all owe him.  Also, his concession speech will be
> >> remembered as extremely gracious and poised.
> >>
> >> At least we'll have him back for a few months in '96 (and god forbid any
> >> longer).
> >>
> >
> >Your idea for a ticket has merit.  Unfortunately, it assumes that Quayle and
> >the more moderate factions of the GOP can wrest control of the party from th
> >Radical Religious Right.  Of course, we can always start up
> >alt.fan.radical.reilgious.right if they maintain control or form their own
> >political party...
> >
> >
> >
> >|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
> >|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
>
> Quayle a moderate? By whose standard, Mussolini's?
> Without the extreme Radical Religious Right and its allies, he'd have
> almost no support from anyone. Let's face it, Dannoe is practically
> the poster boy for right wing nutzis in this country.
>

No, you got it all wrong.  Danoe is a wuss.  He's already trying to distance
himself from the crazies since the election.  He has become such a Bush-ism
that he potentially can define himself with the moderates or the crazies.
Besides, the Facists in the country already have Buchanan for a poster boy, and
the religious nuts have Uncle Pat.  If Our Boy wants to take a shot at '96,
he's going to have to identify with the middle-of the road GOP types.

Hell, if they could get Marilyn to lighten up her hair, raise the hemline on
her dresses an inch or two, and shut that damn obnoxious mouth of hers, Our Boy
could become the popular choice of every baby boomer who owns an Uzi and wants
to wear an armband... :-)



|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6511 alt.politics.bush:13579 alt.politics.clinton:16508
From: M19249@mwvm.mitre.org
Subject: Re: Quayle Quarterly
Organization: The MITRE Corporation, McLean VA 22102
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 17:52:22 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.150710.26934@news.columbia.edu>
egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:
 
>[Quick question: did The Quayle Quarterly predate a.f.d-q?]
>
>VOTERS DENY 2nd TERM TO QUAYLE QUARTERLY
>
>by Evelyn Nieves (Special to the NY Times, 11/5/92, p.B26)
>
>[reproduced for our reading pleasure w/o permission]
>
>BRIDGEPORT, CT, Nov. 4 -- When the Bush-Quayle ticket lost the
>election, Deborah Werksman and Jeffrey Yoder lost the publishing
>venture that brought them considerable international attention.
>
>The founders of The Quayle Quarterly say they are happy campers.
>
>After three years of running the 20-page newsletter devoted to the
>positions, gaffes, opinions and gaffes of "the man who could be the
>next President," Ms. Werksman, 34 years old, and Mr. Yoder, 37 years
>old, confessed that they are glad that they won't have Dan Quayle to
>kick around anymore.
>
>"What's good for satirists isn't necessarily good for the country,"
>Mr. Yoder said.
>
>Ms. Werksman added, "It really is the best way to go out of
>business."
(Stuff deleted)
>
>The journal has been taken seriously in corners that count.  When
>the publishers appeared on "Donahue" in 1990, Roger Ailes, the
>Republican media whiz, and David Beckworth, the Vice President's
>spokesman, appeared on the same program to defend him.
 
NPR this morning had an interview with Werksman.  In their report NPR also
quoted Beckworth upon hearing of the Quarterly's demise "A great loss for
American literature".  Nice to hear some meaningful sarcasm from one so close
to DQ.
>
>Letters to the quarterly range from the giddy ("This is great!") to
>the outraged ("You make me vomit.").  The publishers say they have
>also received one death threat.
(More stuff deleted)
>On Thursday they begin work on the 12th and last issue of the
>journal, which will be devoted to finding Dan Quayle a job.  The
>issue also includes a board game for readers to play.  Then Ms.
>Werksman plans to start a women's humor magazine, "Hysteria."
 
The NPR interview indicated a broad based political humor magazine was
the next project.
>
>"After Quayle I wanted to follow my heart," she said.
>
>The Quayle Quarterly, published by desktop computer out of a spare
>bedroom in their home, has spawned a book, "What a Waste to Lose
>One's Mind," after Mr. Quayle's perhaps most infamous gaffe.  (The
>book costs $6.95 and can be ordered through the Quarterly.)  The
>couple also sell a 1993 calendar, "Politically Incorrect Government
>Officials (PI-GOS)," for $7.95.
>
>The publishers fully expect the magazine will become a collector's
>item and are selling all 12 issues, usually sold at $3.95 each on
>newsstands, in a package for $44.95.
>
>Will the Quayle Quarterly return in '96 if the Veep does?
>
>"Yes," they said in chorus.  "Definitely."
>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 18:43:07 EST
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: 50 Years From Now...

In article <1992Nov5.013106.3738@netcom.com>, madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi
Hausmann) says:

>So, should Mr. Switzer's prognostications be (ha!) accurate,
>what scenario do you think would ensure this?  Consider...

>President Clinton struggles with the economy.
>It stays broken.
>He tries more and more fixes.
                        ^^^^^   You misspelled "taxes." Otherwise, correct.
>It stays broken.
>.....

>Jack Kemp enters the race for '96.
>He's leading.
>The Republicans are unified and happy.

...and Kemp wins in '96 like Clinton in '92 (except with >50% of the vote).

I think this will play out pretty well (with the appropriate deletions &
corrections, which I've taken care of).

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6427 alt.politics.bush:13430
From: michael@albert.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
Subject: Re: Quayle Quarterly
Date: 7 Nov 92 02:47:35 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Organization: Boston University
In-reply-to: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu's message of 6 Nov 92 15:07:10 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.150710.26934@news.columbia.edu> egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:

  =VOTERS DENY 2nd TERM TO QUAYLE QUARTERLY

  =by Evelyn Nieves (Special to the NY Times, 11/5/92, p.B26)

  =[reproduced for our reading pleasure w/o permission]

  =BRIDGEPORT, CT, Nov. 4 -- When the Bush-Quayle ticket lost the
  =election, Deborah Werksman and Jeffrey Yoder lost the publishing
  =venture that brought them considerable international attention.
[...]
  =Letters to the quarterly range from the giddy ("This is great!") to
  =the outraged ("You make me vomit.").  The publishers say they have
  =also received one death threat.

It must have been Robert Davis. :^)

  =Will the Quayle Quarterly return in '96 if the Veep does?
  ="Yes," they said in chorus.  "Definitely."

Alleluia.
Chaplin.
--
=========================================================================
Michael A. Chaplin           If you want *their* opinions, ask *them*.
michael@albert.bu.edu ....The Einstein Papers Project, Boston, Mass., USA
chaplin@husc.harvard.edu ....Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., USA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
From: ssac+@andrew.cmu.edu (Stephen Alan Sisson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Malcolm X?
Date: 9 Nov 92 01:53:26 GMT
Organization: Sophomore, Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Jumpin' Judas, you lil' satanists!
I don't think Malcolm X was racist, just horribly realistic and
passionate. Doesn't sound like the same thing to me.

						Teevie >:0)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford)
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Keywords: Flame, attraction of moths to
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 21:30:59 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.060050.14746@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>, rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
|> 
|> No, I'm a realist who's ancestors were amongst this nation's founding
|> fathers.  

Really??  Cool!!  Which tribal rolls list you as a member?  
I'm part Cherokee (and listed under my maiden name :-)).

-- 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|    /)                      | Lana Mountford    
|   / /  __    ___    __     |   
|__(_/__(__)\__/  )__(__)\__ |  
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: slgsn@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Letterman Top 10 reasons Bush lost
Date: 9 Nov 92 19:29:21 MDT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1992Nov6.220537.7774@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, myrab@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (myra.bronstein) writes:
> Thought *fer sure* that someone would have posted this,
> but since no one has...
> 
> Letterman--Top 10 Reasons Bush Lost the Election--
>>>#1 reason<<:
> 
> 1) Quayle is no Stockdale
> 
> Myra
#2-Too many fucking liberals wanting a shit-load of hand-outs from Slick-Willy.
   Dave-Utah State
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson)
Subject: Re: Complete this sentence
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 21:06:24 GMT

In <D2150056.hvog4b@erics.infoserv.com> erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) writes:


>Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>> Naw, we need someone with EXPERIENCE... Nixon/Quayle in '96!!!
>> The stand-up comedian dream ticket!  :)

>Sorry to disappoint you; Nixon's been elected twice so he's ineligible.
>But Ford/Quayle, now there's a ticket with some real quotes file
>possibilities!

Then how about Quayle/Nixon?

Can a two-term president serve again as VP? Or does the amendment
(can't remember which number) prohibit a two-term prez from ever
serving at the executive level again in *any* capacity?

Michael
From: ingram@cs.duke.edu (Robert "E" Ingram)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Maybe we won't miss Dan so much...
Summary: i hate r. limbowe
Date: 10 Nov 92 15:49:13 GMT
Reply-To: ingram@cs.duke.edu
Organization: Duke University Computer Science

In article JzH@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu, asurpren@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (aimee surprenant) writes:
>Hey, did you hear that Al and Tipper got lost in the woods 
>in Virginia yesterday?
>
>Maybe we won't miss Dan so much!
>
>-Aimee

I have always thought that Al was very funny.

Im even working on a Gore impression: Speak slowly, & show no inflection.

Unfortunately, if you want to make fun of the big guy, you have to share
the stage with hate-mongers like kruuger, rdavise, & limbowe. not very
pleasant company.

---
--
Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27706
Internet:	ingram@cs.duke.edu    (Robert Ingram, Systems Programmer)
UUCP:		mcnc!duke!ingram
From: sstover@sumax.seattleu.edu (Maven o'Mirth)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Lest we forget.
Date: 7 Nov 92 02:13:09 GMT
Organization: Seattle University, Seattle WA


Saddened though we are that Our Man Dan's antics will be less and less
reported, this last Newsweek reminded me why I was really afraid to begin
with:

	"A very positive message."  --Dan Quayle, after listening to a
sermon in which a Georgia minister condemned homosexuality as "satanic."

A brighter future...

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.     . *~*}    Sheryl Stover           | "The Republicans were right! We're
   .    *~*}    sstover@seattleu.edu    | all gettin' sucked down a cesspool
 . *  . *~*}    (& Hemingway & Clio)    | of depravity and bad manners! Time
 *    . *~*}    Medici in the studio in | for action!! We'll stop it cold!!!
.  .    *~*}    December                | Get goin! Okay! sit down, shut up,
    *   *~*}                            | and do the family values thing!!"
 .    . *~*}                            |		-Opus
From: jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. Schechner)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Actual Dan Quayle Interview
Date: 10 Nov 92 01:28:16 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <92314.104948BFANTLE@auvm.american.edu> <BFANTLE@auvm.american.edu> writes:
>I want to thank you for posting the Quayle Interview.  I found it interesting.
> I was very annoyed with all the stupid comments that were in the <>.  You are
>entitled to your opinion obviously, but put it at the end or at least not in th
>e middle of the paragraphs.  Maybe if you were funnier I wouldn't mind.
>
>Thanks again,
>
>barry

	Barry, realize that you are flamming the moderator of
rec.humor.funny for not being funny.  Maddi has consistently posted
some of the funniest stuff I've read on the net.  She is second only
to the Dandroid (Sorry Maddi, but I'm sure even you have to concede
that point :-))
	If you like Danoe, you are definately in the wrong place.  Try
alt.politics.losers, or alt.politics.morons, or maybe even
alt.politics.conservative.haha.not.a.chance.

-Jason

-- 
"I sneak in my own house... it's 4 in the morning... I've had too much to 
drink... said I was out with the boys... I sneak in my bedroom... slip 
into bed... I know if I wake her, I'll wake up.... DEAD!"
   							-Dave Mustaine