HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: wyborsr@wl.com (Russ Wyborski)
Subject: Re: Hobert, UW on the ropes.
Organization: Warner Lambert / Parke-Davis
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 20:07:34 GMT

In article <Q7==sCA@engin.umich.edu> chyang@ruapehu.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang) writes:
>
>In article <1992Nov6.063011.29843@serval.net.wsu.edu>, jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer) writes:
>> 
>> KSTW channel 11 (Tacoma, WA) just devoted the first
>> 14 minutes of their newscast (*not* the sports segment
>> but the regular news portion) to the Hobert incident.
>> Include was a recap of the loan details ($50,000 from a 
>> golfing partner's father living in Post Falls, ID); interviews
>> with students on campus, middle-aged Husky fans in a local
>> sports bar; and even a 1-900 call-in poll with the question:
>> "Do you think it was wrong for Billy Joe Hobert to accept the
>> loan?" :-D    They also said that the NCAA has announced the
>> beginning of a full investigation of Hobert and the entire
>> UW football program.  If anything else is found, look for some
>> major-league sanctions.
>> 
>
>	That is really unfortunate.  However, according to CNN,
>Hobert has now been suspended from the team and the NCAA would 
>not commit any action until UW finishes its own investigation.
>I really hope this think does not get out of hand.  Washington 
>has just started to start something wonderful and I hope that
>it will not be spoiled because of an bad apple.  
>
>	Hobert said that he will turn pro next year if his
>last year eligibility were taken away.  
>>>Sounds like this guy is already living like a pro!! Now he just needs a DWI
>>> or two to round things off.
>	Thank god that the quarterback position in UW is deep!
>
>- Chung Yang
>> Jim
>> Go Vikings, Northstars!
>> 


-- 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ASDXPSC <ASDXPSC@MVS.UCC.OKSTATE.EDU>
Subject: Re: New Conference (Best of Big8/SWC)
Organization: Oklahoma State University Computer Center
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 14:39:00 GMT

>
>
>
>  With all of the rumors about CU moving to the PAC 10 and Texas
>  and Texas A&M leaving the SWC, I wonder why there has been no
>  talk of forming a new conference with the best teams of the
>  BIG 8 and the SWC?
   **** deleted ****
>  There are probably some good reasons this has not been discussed, but I
>  haven't heard them.  What do you think about this idea?
>
        The two conferences better get off their collective duffs and
        look seriously at the alternatives.  I feel it would be in the
        best interest of all schools concerned to merge the two conf.
        The Big 8 has recently redone the split on television money
        which will bring it more in line wiht the SWC.  At the current
        time the Big 8 shares money to a much greater extent that the
        SWC.  Perhaps with the new revenue sharing formula in the
        Big 8 we will see some movement on the merger issue.

************************** HEALTH AND GOOD LIFE TO YOU *************************

    My opinions are in great abundance, but strictly my own and I am
    certain the University in no way cares to even hear them let alone
    share in them.  STANDARD DISCLAIMERS APPLY.

                                   Preston Carrier
                                   Email address:
                                   ASDXPSC@MVS.UCC.OKSTATE.EDU
                                   Home:(405) 377-1260
                                   Office:(405) 744-6918
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: conditt@tsd.arlut.utexas.edu (Paul Conditt)
Subject: Re: Trevor Cobb 6, Lloyd Hill 0
Organization: Applied Research Laboratories, University of Texas at Austin
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 14:06:21 GMT

In article <BxDD6G.E4s@rice.edu> tomscud@ruf.rice.edu (Thomas Reid Scudder) writes:
>After the extensive woofing on the part of these two individuals before
>the Rice-Texas Tech, neither of them scored as much as predicted.  However,
>Rice annihilated Tech by the score of 34 - 3, making the choice of Tech as our
>homecoming opponent look very wise indeed.  The Rice defense played its best
>game since the 26-24 loss to UH in '90 (the year Klingler narrowly lost
>the Heisman), allowing a fair number of yards, but keeping Tech out of the
>endzone.  21 of the Owls' points came as a direct result of defensive plays,
>14 of them on interception returns by Shawn (Sean?) Washington, and 7 of
>them following a blocked punt which set up a 1 yard Trevor Cobb touchdown
>run.  The rest of the Rice points came on 2 first-half field goals and a
>touchdown pass in the second half when the Owls were basically running out
>the clock.  Trevor Cobb had 110 yards rushing in the first half.  I dont know
>what his total rushing yardage was.
>
>(That was remarkably restrained, wasn't it?)
>
>WOOF!  WOOF!  WOOF!  GO RICE!  RUN UP THE SCORE!  SHOW NO MERCY!  TRIPLE DIGITS!
>-- 
>Tom Scudder                    tomscud@ruf.rice.edu
>"It's 106 miles to Chicago, we have a full tank of gas, a half pack of
>cigarettes, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses."
>"Hit it."
>-John Stuart Mill
>
I can't believe it.  Rice not only out-woofed Tech, but obviously
out-played us, too.  I'll put my vote in for Trevor for Heisman.  I looked
at the paper Sunday and Hill did have over 100 yards receiving, but
it obviously wasn't enough.  It's a shame for Tech that Clemmons hasn't
thrown hardly any interceptions all year and throws 3 against Rice.  I
was afraid that Tech might have a big letdown after losing a big game
against UT, similar to how they did after the A&M game.  Congrats to
Rice.  When do they play UH?

Paul (looks like we'll have to wait til next year for a winning season)
Conditt


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: quangl@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Quang Le)
Subject: Re: CFPOOL: Week #10 Results
Organization: Motorola Inc., Austin Tx.
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:01:38 GMT

In article <1992Nov8.162530.429@alc.com> stassen@alc.com (Chris Stassen) writes:
>'@' = Week winner, includes 40-point bonus for winning
>+---------+------------+----------+----------+--------------+-----------------+
>|        Score This Week          |     Year To Date        | Entrant         |
>|  score  | percentage |by thirds |   score  | percentage   |    Name         |
>+---------+------------+----------+----------+--------------+-----------------+
>| 1000.00 | 18/18 100% | 06-06-06 | 10000.00 | 175/179  98% | PERFECT SCORE   |
>+---------+------------+----------+----------+--------------+-----------------+
>|@ 793.65 | 13/18  72% | 05-03-05 |  6432.19 | 098/179  54% | Quang Lee       |

What?! On the week that unfortunate UT lost to the lowly TCU I won the pool.
Thank you, Chris, for not put UT vs. TCU game in :-)

We still have a shot in cotton bowl anyway. Gardere will rebound and win 
last three games.

HOOK'EM HORNS





-- 
* Quang Le|e-mail:quangl@oakhill.sps.mot.com  *   This space     *
* "Nothing belongs to human is strange to me" *   is reserved    *
*             German Proverb                  *   for future     *
*       (Translated and Retranslated)         *   expansion      *
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jeff@photon.cs.tamu.edu (Jeff Goldberg)
Subject: Re: Trouble at the UDub
Followup-To: Jeff@cs.tamu.edu 
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Texas A&M University
	<1992Nov6.003422.21651@u.washington.edu>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 07:24:01 GMT

>In any case, what Hobert did was *very* stupid, blowing the money on a
>1992 Camaro, guns, golf clubs, partying, and a stereo.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^
 The dumbshit, *I* would have at least gotten a Porshe out of it (and
still had money left for guns, stereo, etc)!
--
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: confused@cwis.unomaha.edu (stephen richard smith)
Subject: Re: NEBRASKA
Keywords: NEBRASKA FOOTBALL
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 21:10:00 GMT

confused@cwis.unomaha.edu (stephen richard smith) writes:
 MOST SORRY FOR TYPO'S HAVE CORRECTED MOST OBVIOUS HERE----- HEY GIVE ME
A BREAK I WENT TO SCHOOL ON A mIAMI FOOTBALL SCHOLORSHIP(Little "m" ain't a
typo)        ||
             ||
             \/
>  Nebraska IS BACK at the time of this writing it is 35 - 7 against KU
>#16 Tom and his team is doing the same thing to KU as they did to Colorado
>only difference is that the Kansas coaches and team members are not pouting 
>and crying. Once again Nebraska fans are treating the KU fans with respect
>-something miami and CU need to learn about.You always are treated well when
>you come to our house
>     TO all the nay-sayers Osborne has the pass offense pegged-much of what you saw 
>against CU is brand new. NU also is sporting one of the most sought after
>QBs' in the country -true freshman Tommie Frazier who is along with Jones and
>Brown destroying anything the opponents try to use to stop them.
>  my prediction for this year-- Nebraska # 2 or 3 next year??? LOKK OUT
                                                                ^^^^
                                                                LOOK
>Miami We want you worse than those snots in colorado. Watch the films
>and get ready if you can.

>I am trying not to gloat really I am
>I will not gloat..I will not gloat..I will not gloat.. I will not gloat
>Ah the hell with it GO CORNHUSKERS PUT SLAP THESE PUNKS BACK INTO THEIR
                                    ^^^
                                    AND 
>PLACE   TOM IS THE WIZARD PERIOD END OF STORY..........................
>--
>__________________________________________________________________________
>| the federal government is basically one enormous, ongoing meeting from |
>| HELL-----Dave Barry                                                    |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
__________________________________________________________________________
| the federal government is basically one enormous, ongoing meeting from |
| HELL-----Dave Barry                                                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: rich.emmitt.1@nd.edu (richard.emmitt)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: go spurs
Date: 11 Nov 92 20:59:13 GMT
Organization: University of Notre Dame

how about them golden spurs.  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ongsakul@ee.tamu.edu (Ongsakul Weerakorn)
Subject: Re: A&M 38 Houston 30
Organization: Dept of ELEN, Texas A&M University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:35:48 GMT

jeff@neuron.cs.tamu.edu (Jeff Goldberg) writes:

>I think that this would have been A&M's first loss if Pullig hadn't been
>the quarterback.  Houston seemed to be playing defense well beyond

I agree with you. Pullig played exceptionally well as expected. Not quite
often that we gave up 30 points and still won the game.

>Houston led the game at halftime 17-10, but A&M scored the next 21
>points in the third quarter when they totally dominated.

A&M gave up a couple of big plays in the first half. Houston offense seemed
explosive and unstoppable. But our defense did a very good adjustment
in the second half. 

>Anyway, it was another close one, but A&M is now 10-0.

And it is the first team who are 10-0 this year.

Weerakorn
From: hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org (Huett Bishop)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Is this really true?
Keywords: Bowl game,Pulan Weedeater Bowl
Date: 6 Nov 92 20:59:07 GMT
Organization: Tandem Telecommunications Systems Inc.

In article <Bx9zxA.C9@news.cso.uiuc.edu> sas37147@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Scott A. Splater) writes:
>I've joked about the Toilet Bowl, the Dust Bowl, the Soup Bowl, and
>all of that.  Everyone knows those don't exist.  But is there really
>a Pulan Weedeater Bowl for NCAA Division I teams?  What I have heard
>is that it is in Shreveport, Louisiana, and it is on the 26th of
>December.  Could anyone either verify this, or tell me that it is just
>another joke?  Thanks.
>
>Scott Splater

Yes all true! Hopefully Southern Miss will be able to secure a bid there this
year. Or maybe a better bowl after we beat Florida on Saturday!!! 


A Southern Miss Grad, and a Michigan and Alabama Fan. Go Eagles, M go Blue, Roll Tide,



+--------------------------------------+
|Huett Bishop                          |
| Tandem Telecommuncations Systems Inc.|
|Dallas, TX                            |
|                                      |
|Go Cowboys!!                          |
|                                      |
|email: hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org      |
+--------------------------------------+
From: wm1o+@andrew.cmu.edu (William Karamo Motley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Alabama better than Michigan
Date: 5 Nov 92 06:52:51 GMT
	<1992Nov4.194029.10129@b15.ingr.com>
Organization: Sophomore, Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA






BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
B               BB
B                 B
B                  B
B                   B
B                   B
B                  B
B                 B
B                B
B               B
B              B
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
B              BBB
B                 B
B                  B
B                   B
B                   B
B                  B
B                 B
B                B
B               B
B              B
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 



               A
              A A
             A   A
            A     A
           A       A
          A         A
         A           A
        AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA             
       A               A
      A                 A
     A                   A
    A                     A
   A                       A
  A                         A
 A                           A
A                             A

                     

M                             M
MM                           MM
M M                         M M
M  M                       M  M
M   M                     M   M
M    M                   M    M
M     M                 M     M
M      M               M      M
M       M             M       M
M        M           M        M
M         M         M         M
M          M       M          M
M           M     M           M
M            M   M            M
M             M M             M
M              M              M



               A
              A A
             A   A
            A     A
           A       A
          A         A
         A           A
        AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA             
       A               A
      A                 A
     A                   A
    A                     A
   A                       A
  A                         A
 A                           A
A                             A



!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!















  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: hpang@engin.umich.edu (Ho Sun Pang)
Subject: Super Anti-Bama Anti-Michigan Fan(was: Re: Alabama better than Michigan)
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 92 01:45:53 EST
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor

In article <1992Nov04.224816.37346@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>
>I am neither an Alabama fan, nor a Michigan fan.  I do not dislike either
>team (though, being from Purdue, I had to like last weeks game :-) ).. 
>
>-- 
>David T. Meeks            || "New shadows tugging at the corner of his eye
>VMark Software, Inc.      ||  Jostling for attention as the sunlight flares
>uvmark!davem@merk.com     ||  Through a curtains tear, shuffling its beams
>davem%uvmark@merk.com     ||  As if in nervous anticipation of another day"

From the history of this newsgroup you seems to be a Canes fan.  That does
explain a lot of mindless talks (trash, quasi-trash, woofs, quasi-woofs) on
both schools.  Oh, please count the Huskies as well...

Yea yea yea.  Canes's #1.  Would someone please stop stamping on Bama,
Wolverines and the Huskies?  After the Huskies destroyed the Cardinals last
Saturday, I don't think NOT A SINGLE TALK is necessary to claim who's #1.

At least, until the New Year's Day...

-Louis

P.S. I've tired of negative advertisings:  Yell at all other school's football
     teams, cry out how bad they are, prove how suck their opponents are.  Blah
     blah blah.  Yeah, Michigan is playing the sorry Big 10 teams.  So what?
     If you say Purdue is piece of shit, then what is TCU?

     Save your energy.  Convince NCAA to have a playoff system.  It's more
     constructive than spending time to argue what team is #1.  There is
     *always* arguments to prove a team is #1.  And there is *always* 
     arguments to prove a team is NOT #1.





Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rowdy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (robert.dieckmann)
Subject: Same agony; different scenario.  (RU/VTech, et al)
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 15:33:57 GMT

In 5 games this year VTech had a lead in the 4th quarter and
managed to lose 4 and tie the other.  Frustrating.  Especially
when there are years of such a pattern.

At Rutgers they don't usually lose those games, but they usually
do lose to a team or two that they should blow out.  Why
schedule patsies if you're going to lose to them?  
Cincinnati 26, Rutgers 24 is an outrage.  Why do bad things
happen to good people? Frustrating.  Especially when there are
years of such a pattern.

Either way, it leads to great frustration, especially when
you're trying so damn hard to become "big time."  The secret,
I believe, to going big time is in recruiting.  But to get
the blue chip recruits, you have to win and go to bowls.  The
bowl picture is gone for dear old RU, and, perhaps, the blue
chip recruits are gone too.

Damn.

-- 
"Listen up son, and pay attention.   |  Bob Dieckmann (rwd@quartet.att.com)
How ya' gonna learn anything if you  |  GO: Mets (& dear old Rutgers)
always got your head in a book?"     |  I probably should've included smileys.
                -- Foghorn Leghorn   |  **usual disclaimer**
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: king@meaddata.com (Mike King)
Subject: Re: conway for heisman
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 13:31:48 GMT
Distribution: usa

In article <1d9mkqINNdd3@girtab.usc.edu>, malhotra@usc.edu (Arvind Malhotra) writes:
|> 
|> watch out faulk and hearst here comes conway!
|> 
|> l.a. times reoprts that conway is being pushed for the heisman trophy
|> this year although it is a tough race but it will make his chances next year.
|> if he has a good showing in usc's last four games then he might be a strong
|> contender this year too.

I believe I read in today's paper that USC has started a media
campaign to help him get the heisman.  I think it said that USC sent
out mailers to 500 people/parties.  Is this legal/moral?  Has it been
done before?  Funny, I was always under the impression you won the
heisman for what you did on the field.  Later



-- 
Michael W. King     |  "I'm going to graduate on  |     (513) 865-1395   
Mead Data Central   |  time, no matter how long   |     CAPRR Conversion
P.O. Box 933        |  it takes"                  | mead!mwk@uccba.uc.edu
Dayton, Ohio  45401 |      -- Rod Brookin         |    ...!uccba!mead!mwk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: pbwhite@rodan.acs.syr.edu (White)
Subject: What Ever Happened to Dome Eddie ?
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 11:24:52 EST

I accidently blew away the post on Dome Eddie, but I think I can shed some
light on the infamous man.

A couple of years ago a few fans beat the piss out of Dome Eddie (sorry if
you already posted this info) at a game.  He apparently was hurt pretty bad,
'cause I don't think he works any more (a real job, not running around at the
S.U. games).  The article in the paper the other day said he just settled out
of court with the University for an undisclosed amount of money (much less than
he was suing for).  The Dome security man said he's lucky 'cause if it went to
court, he wouldn't have much of a case against the security - only against the
guys who beat him up.  But at least we don't have to see him at any of the 
games anymore.  But the Dome Knitters still attends the games !

If you really want more info, post your questions again.
Brian





Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: paladin@leland.Stanford.EDU (Jason Gische)
Subject: Re: Huskies scandal could help Arizona again!
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 21:05:32 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.190403.5640@u.washington.edu> wessir@u.washington.edu writes:
>
>
>Hello sports fans.
>   Just how big of a deal is the Billy Hobert scandal?
>Maybe big enough for Arizona fans to celebrate again at the misfortune of the
>Husky football team.  Seems that Thursday will be the deciding date.  If the
>ruling is that the coaches knew about the loan then the Huskies forfeit enough
>games to knock them out of the Rose Bowl picture.  If the Huskies win their
>last two games and Arizona wins it's last two then Arizona goes to the Rose
>Bowl and has a chance at the national title.  Arizona fans hold your breath
>till Thursday!
>wessir

Um, you're close buddy, but no cigar.
If Washington is forced to forfeit all games in which Hobert played, that leaves

Arizona as the number 2 team in the Pac 10 behind ... Stanford.  Stanford's only loss
will have been to Arizona (in division) while Arizona has a loss and a tie.  
That gets Stanford the Roses assuming they win against WSU and Cal.  But then
again, that could be good for Arizona, as it would put them into the Bowl 
Coalition's First Tier, with top-5 contention.  I doubt that UA has a shot at
MNC because it already has a loss and a tie.  It would take a miraculous turn of
events, including Alabama being embarrassed somewhere, Miami losing (probably
twice to drop below Arizona), and A&M losing convincingly (since they haven't
beaten anyone good yet, one loss would drop them to ~#15).  Not to mention FSU
losing again and Michigan getting crushed by the Cardinal in the Rose Bowl.  I
guess it's possible, but not likely.  UA definitely controls it's fate bette
by coming in second in the Pac 10.

Jason Gische
Go Cardinal