From: stevew@helios.unl.edu (Steve Wu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: PRC wants to abrogate Joint Declaration on HK
Date: 20 Nov 1992 23:34:26 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska--Lincoln	
NNTP-Posting-Host: helios.unl.edu

jfl@creek.eel.ufl.edu (Yu-Fung Liu) writes:

>It is the most radicular comparsion I ever saw. 
>First of all, the Bristish is never our mother. If they do concern
>our faith, we will be allowed to immgrant to England at any times.
>How come a mother don't let her own son stay in her house.
>Second of all, the Chinese government will beat you up for sure if they
>consider you as the enemy. But the most chinese did not got killed in 6.4.
>China still have 1 billion population.
>You may possible to prove that she is a old fasion and authoritian mother.
>In fact, you do not have evidence to prove her to be a ganster.
>Everyone knew how the ganster take HK.
>Everyone knew how the ganster rob China.

  If you want to talk about history, let's talk about history.

  Looking back last 50 years, this so called mother is directly and
indirectly responsible to millions of death. During 50's, the CCP
government robed and stole millions from middle class and rich people,
and robed all land from land owner. Although the Chinese government
gave these land to farmers, after two or three years, the Chinese
government again took away the land it had given to the farmer before.
Even thought after the reformation, the wealth that is in the
government's hand are far more then those in the hand of ordinary
people. That is what you called an "old fashion and  authoritarian
mother" has done to her children.

  Comparing to this the British government is much better than the
Chinese government. Even though people in HK are the second class
citizens, people in HK are living in a much better life then those
First Class Chinese citizens lives in the mainland China.

>Everyone knew how the ganster try to rob HK and China again regardless of
>all the protection fee we have paid in all these years.
>Everyone knew how the ganster threat us with "the more delay of the airport,
>it will be pity for China as for HK".
>Everyone knew how the NY Times hide most part of the story to help the 
>ganster to rip off our hard working money.
>Everyone knew how NY Times promote hatred between chinese so that we 
>have to depen on their SUPREME judgement.

  And everyone knows that the Chinese government is extremely low in
credibility.

  The new airport is necessary for HK, however, the Chinese government
only wants to take advantage over HK but refuse to take
responsibility. I haven't had a chance to look into the detail of the
airport issue. But in a long term,  HK needs this airport . Of course,
the British government takes advantage over airport construction, but
the airport will still benefit HK. Solving the overcrowded problems in
East Kowloon area, attracting foreign investment, improving the
air-traffic, and providing more job, all these are just a part which a
new airport can bring. Although we may have notable debt, this is not
the problem, in a healthy economic system, this is normal and also
helpful. The only problem is the Chinese government only want to gain
something from HK without providing any effort and that is why it is
against the Airport and democratization.

  steve
--
stevew@helios.unl.edu  |=| \ Fender / |=| ... smoke on the water, fire in
                       |=|   \    /   |=| the sky...   Smoke on the water.
stevew@hoss.unl.edu    |=|     \/     |=|     (36 bars guitar solo)
		      Deep purple, the best