HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: J.Theodore.Schuerzinger@dartmouth.edu (J. Theodore Schuerzinger)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.president.clinton
Subject: Re: My man Al!
Date: 23 Jan 93 16:11:13 GMT
 <1993Jan21.161758.23113@news.columbia.edu>  
 <1993Jan22.013943.23690@pony.Ingres.COM>
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a5@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <1993Jan22.013943.23690@pony.Ingres.COM>
garrett@Ingres.COM (IF YOU CANNOT CONVINCE THEM, CONFUSE THEM) writes:

> In article <1993Jan21.161758.23113@news.columbia.edu>, egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)            writes...
> >In article <1jmfveINNiv@gilligan.East.Sun.COM> mike@gilligan.East.Sun.COM (Mike Roncadori) writes:
> >>So, did anyone else hear about Al Gore's little slip-up over
> >>at Monticello?
> >>Apparently, Al Gore pointed to a portrait hung in one of the
> >>rooms in Thomas Jefferson's former home, and asked "Who's
> >>that?" to the amazement of those present.
> >>It was a portrait of George Washington.
> >>
> >Can we say, alt.fan.al-gore?  Don't forget he and Tipper got lost in
> >the woods with a corps of Secret Service a whiles back.
> > 
> Al has only been vice-president for a day now and he is already working
> on a quote file of his own. Maybe it's something in the water of the vice-
                             
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> president's mansion.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Surprisingly enough, it's though that the water in the VP's mansion
might have something to do with the fact that both George and Barbara
Bush came down with Graves' disease, while Millie developed a canine
form of lupus.  Those diseases are rather rare.

--Ted Schuerzinger
email: .zed@Dartmouth.EDU
"I should have realized it would be bad vodka when all the label said
was 'Russian Vodka'."
From: vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: ending Quayle's legacy
Date: 24 Jan 93 04:17:54 EST
Organization: The Ohio State University, Department of Physics

In article <1jsq7jINNgv8@bigboote.WPI.EDU>, carrie@wpi.WPI.EDU (Carrie A Ayers) writes:
> I heard on the news the other day that Clinton made an effort to end
> some of Quayle's legacy by dismantling the President's Council on
> Competitiveness.
> 
> patricia
> 
> -----
> Ding, dong, the Bushman's gone.  Kicked him out.  Right out of there.
> The Bushman's gone at last!
> 
> 

Heard it yesterday. Bill is axing the Reaganbush infrastructure. I like it.
Once that crap is gone we can rebuild this nation.

-G

(All flame directed to dev/null)


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: erics@sco.COM (eric smith)
Subject: Re: Uh-Oh!!
Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:57:05 GMT


DCHRISTO@vm.cc.purdue.edu (Dorothy J. Christoff) writes:

>There was an AP article out of Washington in yesterday's local paper.
>The headline was "After 16 years, Quayle slips quietly out of town"
> 
>A few paragraphs:
> 
>[...]
> 
>"'All right, folks.  Sine die,' said Quayle with a laugh,
>borrowing the Latin expression that Congress uses when it
>adjourns with no fixed date of return."

Looks like Danny is planning another trip to Latin America.
He's been boning up on his Latin again!

-----
Eric Smith		|
erics@sco.com		| "Golf is key to understanding the Vice President"
erics@infoserv.com	|	 - close aide to Dan Quayle
CI$: 70262,3610		|

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: tim@iss.nus.sg (Tim Poston)
Subject: Re: Good news or bad?
Organization: Institute of Systems Science, NUS, Singapore
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 03:56:58 GMT

mitch@seashell.seas.ucla.edu (Robert R. Mitchell (SEAS admin)) writes:
: In article <LCL.93Jan18164127@splinter.coe.northeastern.edu> lcl@meceng.coe.northeastern.edu writes:
: >[...]
: > (Death penalties are not a deterrent) Lisa Caroline
:    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: 
: Maybe not, but they are effective at stopping repeat offenders.
Nah.
Next incarnation, they come back spitting bile.
Particularly when (as often happens) you convict the wrong guy.
From: jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. Schechner)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Well, there's no alt.fan.call.me.al
Date: 27 Jan 93 04:55:11 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1993Jan26.032527.20101@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> wilson@gauss.cs.jhu.edu (Dwight Wilson) writes:

[garbage and such deleted]
>
>MY PARTY!  MY PARTY????

[flame deleted]
>
>Now that you've accused me of being Republican, and I've accused
>you of humorless, can just shake hands (so to speak) and call it even?
>
>-Dwight

	Actually, I was calling the original poster that deepest
insult: a republican.  I know your posts better than that Dwight. :-)

-Jason
-- 
"I sneak in my own house... it's 4 in the morning... I've had too much to 
drink... said I was out with the boys... I sneak in my bedroom... slip 
into bed... I know if I wake her, I'll wake up.... DEAD!"
   							-Dave Mustaine
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayles Not Going anywhere
Date: 27 Jan 93 02:02:32 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <C1GyJy.7y3@optimla.aimla.com> jc@optimla.aimla.com (John VanHoozer) writes:
>Heard this A.M. on local L.A. radio (near as I can remember):
>
>Dan Quayle will *not* be going to work for a think tank or anyone 
>else very soon.  It seems that <SOME PUBLISHER> is paying more than 
>$1 million to write his memoirs....

Whadda put-down.  Millie's getting $2M for _her_ memoirs.  I suppose
she should get the bonus for better stylistic touches.



--
"Duff Beer for me, Duff Beer for you"
	"I'll have a Duff's, you have one, too...."
From: mwmv@athena.cas.vanderbilt.edu (Michael Mogensen-Vermillion)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: President's health: don't get too comfortable
Date: 27 Jan 93 05:14:45 GMT
Organization: Vanderbilt University Mathematics Department

In article <C1Dyn0.FA2@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jhsu@ih-nxt05.cso.uiuc.edu (Jason Hsu) writes:
>become president.  If the people of Washington state didn't like Foley,  
>why did they vote for him during both the Democratic primary and general  
>election?  And why do voters want term limits while repeatedly reelecting  
>their own incumbents?  It just doesn't make sense.


They like their own incumbents, it's everyone else's incumbent that
messes things up
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jc@optimla.aimla.com (John VanHoozer)
Subject: Quayles Not Going anywhere
Organization: OptImage Interactive Services Co., L.P.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 16:16:46 GMT

Heard this A.M. on local L.A. radio (near as I can remember):

Dan Quayle will *not* be going to work for a think tank or anyone 
else very soon.  It seems that <SOME PUBLISHER> is paying more than 
$1 million to write his memoirs....


The potential for this book is staggering!!!

Of course,  they'll hire a ghost writer and the obligatory
spelling checker.

				jc


-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
John C. VanHoozer			     |
OptImage Interactive Services Company, L.P.  |  uunet!{optimage,aimla}!jc
11040 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite #300	     |  Fax:  (310)445-5720
Los Angeles, Ca. 90025			     |  Phone:(310) 445-5721
___________________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer:
   Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Sign in window:  Counter-help wanted 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jhsu@ih-nxt09.cso.uiuc.edu (Jason Hsu)
Subject: Re: dan quayle CHAT line
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 17:54:51 GMT

In article <1jhlokINNjqq@lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk> maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk  
(Mr J S Graley) writes:
> You can talk directly to mr quayle himself, via his secratary's
> computer terminal.
> 
> Type 
> 
> telnet 128.186.2.99 2010

Is this for real, or are you just kidding?
From: acsca@UMASSD.EDU
Subject: YOUR ALL UPSET! AYE?
Reply-To: acsca@UMASSD.EDU
Organization: UMASS DARTMOUTH, NO. DARTMOUTH, MA.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 22:01:12 GMT

WOW!
THIS IS GREAT, JUST THE MENTION OF RELIGION SCARES YOU.
I'M JUST WONDERING, WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE OPPRESSION OF IT?
					---JUST CURIOUS
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: tim@iss.nus.sg (Tim Poston)
Subject: Re: Book Notes (NY Times, 1/27/93)
Organization: Institute of Systems Science, NUS, Singapore
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 09:20:14 GMT

egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:

: Cryptically describing the terms of the contract, Mr. Shinker said
: that HarperCollins had acquired world rights, exclusive of film rights
: ["Dan Quayle: The Movie"?  Guesses on who would play the title role?],
I don't have to guess.
Either Reagan, or Bonzo himself.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rdetweil@boi.hp.com (Richard Detweiler)
Subject: Re: Well, there's no alt.fan.call.me.al
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:58:29 GMT
Organization: Hewlett Packard - Boise Printer Division

In article <1993Jan25.201651.8673@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. Schechner) writes:
>In article <1993Jan25.051452.18775@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> wilson@gauss.cs.jhu.edu (Dwight Wilson) writes:
>>In article <1jvh69INNqiq@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>>
>>>  [ Various and sundry stuff ]
>>>
>>
>>Your absolutely right Robert.  Perhaps she should take classes
> ^^^^
>	I know those of us here at a.f.d-q are supposed to be above
>such petty criticism as this, but when the guy posts a total of 17
>original words and manages to screw up the kind of thing my 13
>year-old sister never misses, it just makes you wonder what the contry
                                                                 ^^^^^^
>is coming to.  Fortunately his party is out for at LEAST 4 years.  
>	Why is it that some people just can't grasp the usage of the
>simple apostrophe?
>


	THWEEEEEEEEEET!!!! 

	(The Net Ref throws his little yellow hanky high into 
	the air, proceeds to midfield after conferring with 
	the other Net Officials, and turns on the microphone
	at his hip.)

	"We have an Illegal Spelling Error in a Spelling Flame.  
	Penalty on the offense - 10 yards and loss of argument.  
	Defense may flame at will."

	(Net Ref collects his hanky and waits for the fun to 
	begin.)

>>at the Richard Nixon School of Polite Speech.
>>
>>-Dwight
>
>

:-)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: elambert@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Eber Lambert)
Subject: End of Quayle Season
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:16:58 GMT


We have survived the Reagan Era (Bush being merely the 3rd term
caretaker). Quayle is gone and hopefully quickly forgotten.

A.F.D-Q has been fun but no longer serves a purpose (IMO)...

adios (see ya in 95?)

Ensign, set a course for unsubcribing to A.F.D-Q

engage.

el
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: garrett@Ingres.COM (IF YOU CANNOT CONVINCE THEM, CONFUSE THEM)
Subject: Re: Well, there's no alt.fan.call.me.al
Summary: Duh! 
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Keywords: 
Organization: ASK Computer Systems, Ingres Product Division
Date: 25 Jan 93 23:59:31 GMT

In article <1jvh69INNqiq@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>, rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis)                   writes...
>In article <1993Jan20.030700.8055@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes:
>>In article <1jcvvuINN999@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>>>Tipper and especially Hillary "lick my boots, NOW!, Willie" Clinton.
>>
>>Amazing how some guys are scared shitless by competent women.
> 
>Tipper & Hillary intelligent???? hah hah hah! No, they're not intelligent,
>just shrewd and conniving.  Like cats. 

How did you arrive at cats as a comparison? Is some kind of childhood thing?

>Anyway, who's afraid of them?

I guess you.
> 
>Dan Quayle for U.S. President in 1996!!!  
> 
Please keep posting Mr. Davis. This could be entertaining.
>-- 
>Robert D. Davis            |  VAX/VMS is a text-only adventure game.  If       
>rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu  !  you win, you get to use UNIX.  If you fail, 
>uunet!mystica!rdd          |  you get to use an IBM-PC running MeSsy-DOS

-Garrett
From: bryan@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov (Bryan L. Allen)
Subject: Re: Well, there's no alt.fan.call.me.al
Summary: So what is intelligence?
Keywords: intelligence women rope hanging cats perot
Organization: Lunching on UseNet, Ltd.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 20:10:51 GMT

In article <1jvh69INNqiq@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.030700.8055@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes:
>>In article <1jcvvuINN999@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>>
>>>Tipper and especially Hillary "lick my boots, NOW!, Willie" Clinton.
>>
>>Amazing how some guys are scared shitless by competent women.
>
>Tipper & Hillary intelligent???? hah hah hah! No, they're not intelligent,
>just shrewd and conniving.  Like cats.  Anyway, who's afraid of them?
>...well, with the exception of Willie & Al.

OK, somebody needs to crosspost this to rec.pets.cats (but not me).

I want to know whom you would offer up as an example of a competent/intell-
igent (seems to be some confusion which it is, but competent certainly
does NOT equal intelligent, nor the reverse) woman.

>
>Oh, by the way... speaking of Hillary, I guess that you liberals will
>overlook her crude comment in from of the press the other day.  She's
>really doing a super job of showing off how common and crude she is.
>The Democrats really did a good job of filling the White House with
>trash this time.
>

For those of us not in the know, please fill us in on her "crude comment
in from [sic] of the press" (as long as it was something about J. Danforth,
that is; the charter, y'know.)

>
>Dan Quayle for U.S. President in 1996!!!  

Absolutely! And since the family fortune he's heir to is just lying
about unused, he should take a lesson from Perot and run self-financed.
Just think, Dan Quayle info-mercials! He could draw his own charts!
Oh, bliss!


-- 
            Bryan L. Allen       bryan@devvax.jpl.nasa.gov
            Telos Corp./JPL      (818) 306-6425
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: tim@iss.nus.sg (Tim Poston)
Subject: Re: President's health: don't get too comfortable
Organization: Institute of Systems Science, NUS, Singapore
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 08:02:47 GMT

erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) writes:

: When was the last time a Speaker of the House succeeded to the Presidency?
: I'm really losing sleep over this one.
With some of the hatred of Clinton and Gore that's been posted here,
are you sure a single religious bomb won't get them both?

Don't stand close together, guys!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: spencer@ais.org (Spencer PriceNash)
Subject: Re: Wither Quayle
Organization: UMCC
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:49:35 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.153035.10156@VFL.Paramax.COM> train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge) writes:
> From today's _Philadelphia Inquirer_:
>   [...]
>   A USA Today/CNN/Gallop poll two weeks ago found that 23 percent of
>   the 1,000 adult Americans surveyed think he is qualified to be
>   president --- a drop of 17 percent from the 40 percent who found him
>   qualified to run the country in a July 1991 survey.  In other words,
>   even as he gained experience in the job of vice president, his image
>   suffered."

It'd be interesting to see if the drop was because of things he said or
did.  For example, polls done before, then immediately after the
potato(e) incident or the Murphy Brown fiasco might determine if there
is cause and effect.  Hmm.


> _________________________________________________________________________
>|                                 |                                       |
>| Herbert Rutledge, aka Train     |                                       |
>| Paramax Systems Corporation     | "To post is human; to flame, divine." |
>| Valley Forge Labs, M/S GVL-3    |                                       |
>| P.O. Box 517, Paoli, PA  19301  |                     ---Alexander Pope |
>| Internet: train@vfl.paramax.com |                                       |
>|_________________________________|_______________________________________|
-- 
Spencer PriceNash   spencer@spencer.ann-arbor.mi.us   spencer@ais.org
"Dan Quayle is our Vice-President!  Isn't that a shame?"  -- A.B., eight
 years old
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Well, there's no alt.fan.call.me.al
Date: 26 Jan 93 21:06:46 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department

Bryan L. Allen writes:

>>Dan Quayle for U.S. President in 1996!!!  

>Absolutely! And since the family fortune he's heir to is just lying
>about unused, he should take a lesson from Perot and run self-financed.
>Just think, Dan Quayle info-mercials! He could draw his own charts!
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm not so sure...do they still make Spirograph any more?  :-)

(NOT an Agnew reference, by the way!  :-))

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Watch for quayle on the highway!
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 08:23:35 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1

I saw in the paper yesterday that our boy has been in touch with Indiana
officials in regard to re-obtaining his driver's license. Apparently
anticipating a long period of chauffeur-driven tenure in the executive
branch (ha!) he foolishly let his Indiana license expire. In his wonderfully
faux-pratician way, Danny wanted them to bend the rules just a little,
so he wouldn't have to actually *go* to Indiana to take care of this
little matter. Sorry, they told him, no dice. He would be required to
appear in person for a vision and written test, and if he waits much
longer he'll have to take a driving test as well. I guess Dan's finding
out real quick what it means to be a private citizen.

The article went on to say that he can always be driven around by his
wife, who with a little more foresight renewed her license in 1990.

On another subject, I also see that Danny has been promised a seven-figure
sum for his memoirs of the last few years. If someone would just send
the publisher the Quayle Quotes file, they could save that cool million.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: garrett@Ingres.COM (IF YOU CANNOT CONVINCE THEM, CONFUSE THEM)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle's driving
Summary: ONLY!
Date: 26 Jan 93 22:36:10 GMT
Organization: ASK Computer Systems, Ingres Product Division
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1

In article <lmb9b0INNab6@news.bbn.com>, temehs@ccs1.bbn.com                                        writes...
>Actually, Quayle only has to take a written and a eye test to get his 
>liscense back.

What do you mean, ONLY!? This is DAN we're talking about. He might flunk
the EYE exam. Can you imagine the reaction when the eye doctor asks Dan to
please read the fourth line?

>			Tom Mehs

-Garrett
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: shimkus@athena.cs.uga.edu (Doc)
Subject: Re: Dan's BOOK!
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 15:24:34 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.152652.18233@VFL.Paramax.COM> train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge) writes:
>In article <C1Du6L.5CF@umassd.edu>, acsca@UMASSD.EDU writes:
>
>|>     Well, "liberal" today,
>|> does not mean "open-minded" as far as politics goes, it means they believe in:
>
>
>  "Many's the time that I have thought that this would be the most perfect
>   of worlds were there no religion in it."  --- John Adams
> 
Uh, I wouldnt exactly use that as an indication of the founding father's
piety, or lack thereof. :)  Its one of the more famous mis-quotations in
history.

This is all off the top of my head, but as i recall, Adams wrote this line
in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, explaining that he had once said this
in exasperation to his pastor as a boy.  He then goes on to careful refute
this schoolboy assertion, lucidly explaining why he was wrong.  The quote has
often been taken out of context by various secular factions to "prove" the
non-religious nature of our Founders.

If anyone wants, I can hunt down my referance for this.  I cannot seem to lay my
hands on the book at the moment.

+doc

PS.  Please forgive all errors of spelling and punctuation.  My editor doesnt 
     like me. :)

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: acsca@UMASSD.EDU
Subject: Re: Dan's BOOK!
Reply-To: acsca@UMASSD.EDU
Organization: UMASS DARTMOUTH, NO. DARTMOUTH, MA.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:21:29 GMT

In article <1993Jan15.154935.13395@VFL.Paramax.COM>, train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge) writes:
>In article <N67DXB1w165w@unkaphaed.gbdata.com>, popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com 
>(William C. Barwell) writes:
>
>|> Just who is dan's constituency other than the Religous Right anyway>
>|> ???
>
>  He also has a large constituency of folks who are just plain dumb.
>  Ignorant.  Morons of such calibre that they make Stimpy look like 
>  Issac Newton.  We've seen them before:
>
>       1.  In Lafayette Square across the street from the White House
>           waving signs in support of Nixon even as the helicopter
>           bore him away from the White House lawn to California and
>           (alas, temporary) disgrace.
>
>       2.  In public demonstrations waving placards with the message
>           "Spiro's My Hero" up until the moment that the indictments
>           against Agnew were handed down by Maryland's Attorney General.
>
>
>>       >  BTW, since the election, I've noticed that among the people I know who
>>>>      were staunch supporters of the last regieme there appear to be symptoms
>>>>      of a major hangover.  Call it "Morning After In America."  I've come to 
>>>>      the conclusion that many of these people are just starting to wake up to
>>>>      the fact that they were thoroughly deceived during the last twelve years.
>>>>      Anyway, it's just a thought.  Anyone else notice anything similar?
>
Just to inform you, I'm not a republican, or a conservative.

But the eighties were a decade of prosperity, and  I don't care what the media, or Bill Clinton says.
------I remember
I think Bush was lowsy, and Quayle was an idiot, but I think Slick Willy is a truthless Commi, panzy, and Al Gore is 
just a living corpse.

Look the past 3 years were lousy, but look at the global economy. (sorry you can't blame Reagan-Bush)
And remember Bush had been president for only 4 years, not 12

so you left wing communist democrats (not all democrats are like you, but you do have a majority)
better get your act together, because I don't think Clinton is exactly what you want either.

                                        catch you later