From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Morons abound!
Summary: Yep.  Peter ought to know.
Date: 29 Sep 92 14:41:52 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: The Radical Middle

In article <nyikos.717710080@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
>In <BuxyCx.GJt@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Sep21.154925.12348@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu (CORRECTUS to you, PatricKKK)  writes:
>>>In article <1992Sep18.090650.2075@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu> dylan@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu (Dylan) writes:
>
>>>PatricKKK Humphrey came to this newsgroup and has harped at me. 
>>>I continue to show him up where he is DEAD wrong. 
>
>>I guess that explains the deafening show of support for you, then...:-)
>>(never mind that you're a newcomer to a.f.r-l, anyway...)
>
>>>PatricKKK Humphrey is the one you need to talk to. 
>>>I didn't come here looking for war, but unlike you, I am fully
>>>equipped to fight when the PatricKKK Humphrey's of this world decide
>>>that verbal terrorism is the order of the day.  
>
>>Ah, yes.  You're *so* peaceful.  Like Dzhugashvili was with the Baltic
>>states in 1939, maybe.
>
>You keep getting the dates wrong.  He took them over in 1940 and again
>in 1944 when he pushed the Nazis back out.

I'll admit, the actual takeover *was* 1940 -- of course, the peace pact
signed by the two countries the previous year was just the greasing of the
skids towards the disappearance of the Baltic states as independent
countries for 50 years, but the actual act itself was indeed in 1940 and not
1939.  (Congratulations, Pete.  You noticed that I can make mistakes, too.
Give yourself a cookie.)

>I'll admit Chaney is not exactly peaceful, but I HAVE tried *very* hard
>to be diplomatic with you, and you pulled that same Dzugashvili
>comparison on me. 

You've tried?  If so, then you've failed miserably.  I seem to remember you
taking it upon yourself to make demands of me in a dispute you had no part
of -- *real* diplomatic approach there, wouldn't you say?

>Son, you wouldn't know a diplomatic approach if they hit you over
>the head with it.

Well, it's a good bet I wouldn't recognize one coming from you -- mainly
because you appear to have no idea of what one is in the first place.

>[I know that doesn't make sense, but does it at least make Zen?]

No.  If it was about 20 lines of blank space -- *that* would make Zen. :-)

>>>Go and deal with the instigator, and that is PatricKKK. 
>
>>Typical Chaney to the last -- *never* take responsibility for your own
>>actions.  You can't blame it on me, Steve -- it's not MY fault you're a
>>hateful, twisted, bigoted little child.  You might want to talk to your
>>parents about that, assuming you can without them spending your
>>inheritance...:-)
>
>Chaney is simply being biblical.  An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,
>and all that.

Why do I have this suspicion that if I was to return the favor, you wouldn't
be saying that?  :-)

>>The U.S. Constitution isn't perfect -- but it's a hell of a lot better than
>>                            what we have now...
>
>Another example of Zen?

No, just another example of an overeducated git at The USC who has no
detectable sense of humor, and thinks that just because he's got a few
accomplishments to his name in one field, that qualifies him to preach to
the rest of us about things he knows less than nothing of...

(but I digress. :-)

-- 
Patrick L. Humphrey  (patrick@is.rice.edu)  Rice Networking & Computing Systems
     +1 713 528-3626 at Rice. 776-1541 at home. 667-6554 at Palace Lanes. 
         What will our "leaders" do once the Constitution is gone --
                   and we STILL have a drug problem???
Newsgroups: talk.abortion