HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Will Steeves <goid@zooid.guild.org>
Subject: Re: Duck and Jive (was Re
X-To: KENN BARRY
Organization: The Zoo of Ids
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 20:54:00 GMT

barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes...
>        Let me put it in plain language, Kevin: if you father a kid you
>don't want, you've got my sympathy up to the point where I and my fellow
>taxpayers end up paying for it. And that's what happens more than half
>the time - single mothers not getting child support account for about
>80% of family aid. I'm happy to pay to keep kids from starving, but I
>insist the first obligation is the parents', both of them. You may not
>want to pay, but I don't, either, and I didn't even get to fuck her :-).
>Don't expect sympathy or support from me for your failure to be a
>responsible adult. The sexual equality argument is bullshit. What you
>are really asking for is public financial support for certain men's lack
                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>of responsibility. Forget it. No way. They owe; they pay.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Oh, but women sure don't "owe" anything when *they* get pregnant, then,
do they?

If a woman doesn't want a child, and doesn't think that she can support
him/her herself, then she is under NO OBLIGATION to bring him/her into
this world, just as I recognise NO OBLIGATION to pay for a child whom
I have chosen during pregnancy, not to support, either.

And don't be telling me about having to spend taxpayer's money - Perhaps
such amounts should be *lowered* as a disincentive to bring a child into
the world who cannot be supported by his/her parents.  It will, sadly
also increase the number of abortions and adoptions, but it would also
reduce the need for people to bemoan their lost tax dollars.

---
Will Steeves, goid@zooid.guild.org                      "Neil Hull is GOiD"
ZOOiD BBS, Toronto, Ontario - The Zoo Of Ids            "GOiDS Rule"
(416) 322-7876

"Gravity: It's more than just a fragrance.  It's the LAW!"
   - Will Steeves, President, GOiDS "R" We, Inc.

 * SLMR 2.1a * Piracy is like stealing.  Yeah, so whats your point?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Ankle bracelets
From: rcf@netlink.cts.com (Bob Forsythe)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 05:53:07 PST
Organization: NetLink Online Communications, San Diego CA

kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi) writes:

> In article <1992Dec24.172147.26637@clsi.COM>, kevin@clsi.COM (Kevin Cameron) 
> > 
> > stevek@netcom.com (Steve Kile) writes:
> > > I'd like to ask the ladies of the net (tm) to answer a question for me.  
> > > frequent a couple of restaurants where the waitresses wear ankle bracelet
> > > (is that the correct terminology?)  These girls are mostly high school or
> > > college age.  I don't recall this type of jewelery being worn during my h
> > > school or college days.  Is this a new fad?  What is the significance of
> > > wearing it on the right versus left ankle?  Thanks.
> 
> 
> Ankle bracelets are commonly used jewellery among females in India. I guess 
> some schoolgirl must have brought them over to USA and then the trend 
> slowly develops.
> 
> 
     Actually, they've been around for a number years.  I can recall 
women here wearing them in the late 70's.
> 
> > 
> > Hey! - someone else that finds ankle bracelets incredibly sexy ? :->
> > 
> > Kev.
> 
> Amen.
> 

     Naah; if you want sexy, you gotta go for the gold chain around the 
waist.  I was shopping for one for a girlfriend once, and couldn't find 
one quite long enough.  The young woman behind the counter kept pointing 
out that theirs were quite long and put one around her neck to show me.  
I rather hesitantly said that it wasn't for her neck, it was for her 
waist.  Wham!  Salesclerk's nostrils flaired and her pupils dialated to 
wide open.  She, at least, was *very* turned on by the idea.

Bob c/o The OTH Gang

--                    
INTERNET:  rcf@netlink.cts.com (Bob Forsythe)
UUCP:   ...!ryptyde!netlink!rcf
NetLink Online Communications * Public Access in San Diego, CA (619) 453-1115
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: erc@unislc.uucp (Ed Carp)
Subject: Re: Women, Cats, & Chocolate
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 00:16:16 GMT

OSSANDER LINDA A (ftlao@acad3.alaska.edu) wrote:
: In article <ljufv4INN9d6@news.bbn.com>, dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes...
: >> In <19DEC199217020049@acad3.alaska.edu> ftlao@acad3.alaska.edu (OSSANDER LINDA A) writes:
: >> 
: >> >Hi I am new to this group. ;-)  Just wanted to say: "Rob" You are the kind of
: >> >man I stay away from.  Grin..I was married to one that sounds like you for
: >> >nearly 20 years.  I would prefur to be alone.  Have a nice day!
: > 
: >I highly doubt that any man of Rob's warmth and intelligence would go 
: >near you.
: > 
: >> As a final comment, if you wish to dislike and insult me, I'd very much
: >> prefer you to simply do so without bothering with the smiley face, the
: >> grin and the "Have a nice day!" admonition.  That seems quite insincere.
: > 
: >Doing so makes me think that you're the type of bimbo who still dots her i's
: >with smiley faces 30+ years after leaving jr. high.
: > 
: >Dawn
: > 
: 
: Dawn..
: 
: You have a right to your own opinions.
: But I think perhaps you maybe the BIMBO!

I didn't understand her comments either.  Sounded like mindless ranting in a
feeble attempt at a flame.  She should not post such drivel until she takes
lessons from the Master Flamer, Oleg Kiselev.
-- 
Ed Carp			erc@apple.com, erc@saturn.upl.com	801/538-0177

Who and what would you be if you went beyond your deepest fears?
Xref: sparky soc.singles:34835 alt.pagan:14575 alt.romance:15517 alt.sex:40284 alt.polyamory:2229 talk.religion.misc:24627
From: uphrrmk@Msu.oscs.montana.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.pagan,alt.romance,alt.sex,alt.polyamory,talk.religion.misc
Subject: Re: Truth
Date: 27 Dec 92 01:59:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: Msu.00965AD8.5F95FFA0
Reply-To: uphrrmk@Msu.oscs.montana.edu
Organization: Montana State University

In article <86w9VB5w165w@freeside.com>, popec@freeside.com (PopeC) writes:
>ivaliote@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Lotus ) writes:
>
>> kalki33!system@lakes.trenton.sc.us writes:
>> >Yes, this is nice. The greatest beauty therefore is the greatest truth.
>> >That is God, the Absolute Truth, Who is absolute ...>
>You gots to exist before you can beautiful or anything else for that 
>matter.  Where is your proff God exists?  

HUH????
Sorry to ruin a lovely debate, (Yes! Subgenius pope of Houston!  BOB rulez!)
but didn't I see this arguement somewhere else too, like Alt.pagan or
alt.brother-jed?  Why is it on alt.sex?  
   (Puzzle, PUZZLE...)
The greatest beauty is the greatest truth.  Cindy Crawford, the Absolute
Beauty, therefore is the greatest Truth. God is the Absolute Truth. Therefore,
Cindy Crawford is God!  All Pay homage to Cindy!  (Reverent bows in all
directions, flowers and incence burned near a giant Cindy Crawford Pic, finding
Meaning and enlightenment in the new Charlie Perfume commercial...I can see it
all now!)
>

                                   Not all thoughts are true, but most of 
                                   them are useful!

                                   La Mort.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: stevek@netcom.com (Steve Kile)
Subject: Re: Ankle bracelets
Organization: Netcom Communications - San Jose, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 21:08:33 GMT

In article <1992Dec24.172147.26637@clsi.COM> kevin@clsi.com writes:
>
>stevek@netcom.com (Steve Kile) writes:
>> I'd like to ask the ladies of the net (tm) to answer a question for me.  I
>> frequent a couple of restaurants where the waitresses wear ankle bracelets
>> (is that the correct terminology?)  These girls are mostly high school or
>> college age.  I don't recall this type of jewelery being worn during my high
>> school or college days.  Is this a new fad?  What is the significance of
>> wearing it on the right versus left ankle?  Thanks.
>
>Hey! - someone else that finds ankle bracelets incredibly sexy ? :->

I don't think I found the bracelets sexy but rather the legs they encircled.
Actually some of the larger bracelets look stupid since they cause bulging
nylons.  Perhaps if the bracelet was worn on the outside...

Now back to the original question.  LADIES...  What is the significance of
wearing these bracelets on the right or left ankle?  (Why do I get the
distinct feeling that nobody knows the answer to this.  Someone saw Susie
wearing one and since Susie is so COOL everyone does it.)     :-)

Steve
----
stevek@netcom.com
From: geoffbe@ids.net
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Ok dis time for real1
Date: 22 Dec 92 13:42:40 EST
Organization: IDS World Network, (401) 884-9002 <data>, [155.212.1.2]

Wanted:
	Girls from countries other than american who like horror films and
having their feet massaged. Hopefully both at the same time.

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: g9utxu@fnma.COM (DJL)
Subject: Korean Female Wanted
Reply-To: g9utxu@fnma.COM
Organization: Fannie Mae
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 16:43:17 GMT

I am posting this for a friend of mine. My friend is an Architect living in VA. He's  
looking for a Korean female preferably living in Washington D.C. Metropolitan area. 
He likes the outdoors and loves all kinds of sports. If there is anyone out there 
who knows someone that would be suitable or would like more info. please e-mail me 
at g9utxu@fnma.COM


Thanks in advanced
From: bjorn@Minsk.docs.uu.se (Bjorn Knutsson)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Attraction -> Acquiantance or vice versa?
Date: 22 Dec 92 23:26:00 GMT
Organization: CS, Uppsala University, Sweden
NNTP-Posting-Host: minsk.docs.uu.se
In-reply-to: jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu's message of 22 Dec 92 18:33:15 GMT

In article <1992Dec22.183315.30901@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JOSEPH ALOYSIUS MCVEIGH) writes:
> mel@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu (Meloney D Cregor) writes:
>
> >The REAL test is can they write their name in the snow?
> >The beauty of the test is that it shows not only manhood, but
> >literacy and dexterity, as well.
>
> And if he has to stand on something to clear the snow level, then you've
> really got a prize.

...or just lots of snow.
--
Bjvrn Knutsson <bjorn@minsk.docs.uu.se>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that you've got it made.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Diane, again
Subject: Re: Over 40 and single....Anyone that "OLD"?
Organization: University of Missouri
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 17:47:24 CST

In article <1992Dec29.232011.16032@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
mel@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu (Meloney D Cregor) writes:
 
>Sure he was.  Who said pets had to be alive?  Granted, the live ones are
>more interactive, but hey, rocks are nice and stuffed pets are nice.  I
>once gave a friend of mine a pet cock.  I don't know, it seemed like the thing
                              ^^^^^^^^!?
>to do at the time.  I thought it was kinda cute.  It came with it's own
>little house and a book with care and feeding instructions and everything.
 
I'm sure your friend apreciated your... thoughtfullness.
I almost got one, but thought that the instructions to exercise it
3-4 times a day were a little excessive. <ahem>
 
Diane
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:00:12 GMT

In article <JoeMan.9.724896947@> JoeMan@ (Joe Tooman) writes:
>  You must be 'clueless' to
>flame a person in soc.singles. 
>--------
>Joe Tooman                     Cleveland State University -- Class of 199?

Is this my birthday present?
 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
                                 doh#0000000005
================================================================================
From: frackas@momad.li.ny.us (George Frackas)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Meeting women in clubs
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 93 04:36:21 EST
Reply-To: frackas@Momad.LI.NY.US (George Frackas)
Organization: Modem Madness BBS    1+516-295-9435


What does one say to a girl in a club, when one wants to meet her?
I can never think of a single word to say to them.  Sometimes I might 
make a futile attempt to start a conversation by asking for a light, or 
for the time, or some stupid crap like that, but after I get the 
light/time or whatever, it's back to "Duh, I don't know what to say" and 
I never meet anyone.

Also, how does one approach a girl he's interested in, when she is 
hanging around her friends?

Any help appreciated.

Frackas@momad.li.ny..us
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tyger@netcom.com (Kristen Kohlbecker)
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Organization:  Something close to nothing, but different than the day before
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 02:42:27 GMT

tmcinern@newcomer.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Timothy McInerney x0 14-2) writes:
>
>>This is my first post on this BBS...finally decided to try it and 
>see if it actually works. My name is Shelley Kitsis and I reside and work in 
>Des Moines, Ia. For 3 years now, I've tried every available resourse I can 
>get my hands on, in hopes of meeting an eligible single Jewish "Mensch"!

>"I'm surrounded by Christians", (an appropriate day to post this
>message, huh?!), _Please_ someone help me!!
>                            Shelley

>	Well, call me crazy Shelley, but did you ever consider dating someone
>	who, (GASP), wasn't Jewish?

I wouldn't call you crazy...ignorant and obnoxious, yes, but not crazy.

>	If you haven't, grow up and start living in the twentith century, 
>	before it becomes the twenty first!

She *is* you insensitive jerkoff. I mean *really*, can't someone have a 
standard or two for whom they will date, party, etc. with without some 
idiot jumping down their throat about something they clearly know nothing 
about? How *dare* you tell her that her standards are wrong! 

>	If you have and still insist on your archaic basis for mating, try
>	Isreal.

Oh yes, I bow to you in your infinite wit and wisdom, you MAN, you...Why
don't you come back when *you* grow up and can think of something more
constructive to say than:

"OHMIGAWD! You are only considering men with similar religious beliefs? How
very...Old World"

Oh, and it's Israel, old boy.

>						Tim the Leper

Tyger 
-- 
      Kristen Kohlbecker    And I would choose to be with you
      tyger@netcom.com      That's if the choice were mine to make   
                            But you can make decisions too
      A Tyger and a Lady    And you can have this heart to break
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Tell Me Something about Balls
Date: 26 Dec 1992 18:45:52 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Dec22.192504.26760@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>Do balls itch?  And if so, why???


The BVD itch.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: krw@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (keith.r.smith)
Subject: Re: Picking up the Tab (was: Re: What is gold-digging?)
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 15:56:14 GMT

In article <d2uo03boc5gW00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> jsp@pls.amdahl.com writes:
>krw@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (keith.r.smith) writes:
>
>}In actual practice, when I invite a woman out, I am _prepared_ to foot
>}the tab, but hoping that the woman will be nice enough to kick-in
>}a portion of the funds (at least, the first time, anyway).  
>}Someting on the order of, "I'll spring for the dinner, and you can
>}spring for the show".  If she does _not_ "step forward", then at the
>}end of the date, when we are both telling each other how nice a time
>}we had, then if she does not come out and offer to treat me the next
>}time, I will suggest it.
>}If she looks at me like I'm crazy, it's "hasta la vista, baby".
>
>You must get in a lot of practice on that line.  You're saying that at
>the end of the first date, you will actually say to the woman something
>like, "I had a wonderful time.  I'd like to see you again, but only if
>the next time it's your treat"?  Ok, that's probably unfair, I'm sure
>you're more diplomatic, so it would be more like, "I had a wonderful
>time.  Would you like to go out again sometime, but as your treat?"
>
>Still, however diplomatically you may put it, I have to say that actually
>suggesting that your date treat you the next time is one of the most crass
>things I've ever heard of.  But then, I suppose that given how vitally
>important this "issue" is to you, how your date reacts serves as an
>effective filter for you.
>
>--James Preston
>

James,
It is a rather effective filter, as I have no desire to go out with
somebody who thinks that she is "too good" to treat a man every
once-in-a-while.  Whether you belive it or not, there _are_ kinder,
gentler, ways to _suggest_ that somebody treat you on the next-go-round.
The way that you put it, it sounds like an ultimatum, and I don't
operate like that.

Keith R
From: huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Date: 2 Jan 1993 18:30:07 GMT
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: access.digex.com

In article <1993Jan1.035942.3748@netcom.com> rohwerwd@netcom.com (Mr. Tickle Monster) writes:
}In article <1hiaj3INN5n9@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
}>I think it's time to let you in on a few secrets.  Men don't consider Christie
}>Brinkley attractive.  One, she's married (last I heard).  Two, she looks too
}>much like a TV spokesmodel, family-oriented platonic beauty in all its
}>blandness.  Three, women are the only ones I ever hear referring to her as
}>attractive, which just goes to prove that you really have to be a man to know
}>what turns on a man.
}
}     I just could not let this go by without responding.
}
}     I think that Christie Brinkley is one of the most attractive
}women alive.  She is very sexy, pretty and has beautiful hair.
}
}     Obviously, you do not know how all men think.

Of course, he doesn't.  However, each of you is the world's foremost expert
on whom or what each of you finds attractive.  No more, no less.

-- Herb Huston
-- huston@access.digex.com
Xref: sparky soc.singles:35186 alt.romance:15622 soc.penpals:5005 alt.romance.chat:22683
From: nin15b63@merrimack.edu (The Wolf)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,soc.penpals,alt.romance.chat
Subject: Re: Do you have a good pickup line?
Date: 3 Jan 93 02:18:45 GMT
Organization: Merrimack College, No. Andover, MA, USA

In article <1993Jan1.035313.5044@samba.oit.unc.edu>,
Mark.Stoffan@launchpad.unc.edu (Mark Stoffan) writes:
> A similar thread was on the net a year or so ago. Someone posted the
> following:
> 
> "Hey, Baby-wanna lock crotches and swap gravy?"
> 
> The poster claimed that he actually saw this work. I'd hate to see the girl it
> worked on, though....

Sure it wasn't the girl who used it?
--
 Andy Harrington                      | nin15b63@merrimack.edu
 Computer Geek                        | aharrington@ldbvax.lotus.com
 Merrimack College, North Andover, MA | I'm too sexy for this network.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: daniel@clsi.COM (Daniel S. Barclay)
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Organization: CAD Language Systems Inc.
	<1992Dec25.180737.10994@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
	<1992Dec25.193834.20166@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Date: 28 Dec 92 13:16:45

Chris Penington (cjp8b@virginia.edu) writes:

> 	Chris (who also likes Chinese and Japanese and wouldn't mind
> trying Littlese.....;) )
         ^^^^^^^^

Gee, I didn't know that there was more than on "little e".

(BTW: Hi Chris!)
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel S. Barclay                    --who's still searching for a good 
CAD Language Systems, Inc.           signature, not liking any of his recent
Suite 101, 5457 Twin Knolls Rd.      feeble attempts to improve on the whiny:
Columbia, MD  21045  USA             Why can't _I_ think of a good signature?

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: daniel@clsi.COM (Daniel S. Barclay)
Subject: Re: Nice Guys
Organization: CAD Language Systems Inc.
	<75375@apple.apple.COM> <1992Dec14.201348.4154@bnlux1.bnl.gov>
Date: 21 Dec 92 14:51:31

schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:
> In article <75375@apple.apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
> >daniel@clsi.COM (Daniel S. Barclay) writes:
> 
> >>I missed the beginning of this.  When do I want to make sure I don't offer a 
> >>backrub?
> 
> On the "Nuclear Streak Machine", world's fastest roller coaster.

1.  (Amazing.  I though this subthread was dead, but weeks later, another 
	response shows up!)

2.  Yeah, I guess a backrub would be pretty pointless (besides impossible) on
	a roller coaster.

3.  Can anyone tell me what the original discussion was about? 


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel S. Barclay                    --who's still searching for a good 
CAD Language Systems, Inc.           signature, not liking any of his recent
Suite 101, 5457 Twin Knolls Rd.      feeble attempts to improve on the whiny:
Columbia, MD  21045  USA             Why can't _I_ think of a good signature?

Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance
From: sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
Subject: Re: About Dating Outside One's Group....
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 02:13:40 GMT
Organization: sorry, wrong newsgroup for that

In article <1992Dec30.104358.12959@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>] In article <lk168jINN42f@news.bbn.com> pdsmith@bbn.com (Peter D. Smith) writes:
>] >
>] >Shelley -- keep up the search!  Compromise is possible on so many things,
>] >but not on (deeply felt) religious principles.  Dating someone outside of
>] >one's faith goes well for a while, but how can you respect someone whose
>] >entire religious beeing is based on error?
>] 
>] Which pretty well encapsulates anyone with religious beliefs.
>
>James,
>
>prudence dictates that you back off on this one.

Sorry, Drieux, I'll have to back James this time.

By definition, anyone whose religious beliefs differ from mine
believes in an erroneous religion; almost all religions say so.

Seth
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Tell Me Something about Balls
Date: 22 Dec 92 19:25:04 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Dec22.191334.20617@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>>>
>Ok lets feel empathy for the men.
>Ok scratch your balls.
>Your done.
>Congratulations.

Do balls itch?  And if so, why???
-- 
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Nance Colucci                                      att!ihlpl!colucci
"It'll be better than before.  Yesterday's gone.  Yesterday's gone!"
-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+-+*+
Newsgroups: soc.singles