HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: patlee@panix.com (Patrick Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.misc,alt.bbs,news.software.readers
Subject: Re: Database off-line reader
Date: 31 Dec 92 03:12:12 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC

In article <1992Dec29.095354.13628@catfish.az05.bull.com> pls@cibecue.az05.bull.com (Paul Schauble) writes:
 > I'm looking for a database oriented offline message reader. By
 > this I mean one that doesn't work on a packet by packet basis,
 > but which copies the packets int into a running database.

If you are referring to QWK format mail readers, there are a few
you can look at.  SPEED READ (SPEED120.ZIP) has a fairly nice
user interface and allows purging of message by # of dates and
some other criteria.  Its main lack, to me, is no internal editor
and the inability to read more than one message at the same time.
When I have a database, I would like to quote and reference saved
messages easily while I type my reply, hence the need for both of
the above.

MegaMail Reader (MEGAR210.ZIP) reads both QWK and MegaMail for-
mat.  It is one of the first database type reader on the market.
It does have a useable internal editor and the ability to refer-
ence messages in any conference/echo and any BBS.  Its user
interface can use some work, IMO.

There is a new program coming out soon called RoboMail by the
author who brought us Robocomm.  It is both one-packet-at-a-time
reader and database.  From his work on Robocomm, I would say he
has no problem with user interface.  What features the program
has, I don't know.  But beta testers say it will be out real soon
now.

--
Patrick <patlee@panix.com>

Maintainer of QWKLAY*, detailed QWK specification; and QWKP*,
list of QWK format programs (readers, doors, and utilities).
From: rad@railnet.nshore.ORG (Rick DeMattia)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: MAKEDIG.ZIP now available.
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 93 16:23:21 EST
Organization: Railnet BBS +1 216 786 0476

roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail) writes:

> As long as your signature sterts with "--\n", you won't get the
> helpfile unless you ask. ;->

Say Roy, shouldn't that be "-- \n"?

--
UUCP: {uunet|backbone}!railnet!rad   rad@railnet.nshore.org
CompuServe: 72517.666@compuserve.COM
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
From: ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims)
Subject: Re: That header (BAR) line on the top of my screen...
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 01:37:06 GMT

dwrage@ddt-archives.athens.oh.us (David Wm Wrage) writes:

>Is there any way to remove it or move it to the bottom where it won't bug me as
>much?  Moving it to the bottom of the screen would be better, but removing it
>is also a valid option.


It appears to be fixed.  Set the characters to black-on-black (or whatever)
and ignore it.

-- 
     halcyon.com, Public Access Internet, Seattle, WA, +1 206 382 6245
                 "A World of Information at your Fingertips"
                 P.O. Box 555, Grapeview, WA 98546-0555, USA
                    ralphs@halcyon.com,  +1 206 955 1050
From: crespin@nadir.uucp (Rudy Crespin)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Reason a new .UUCP address bounces mail??
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 18:08:47 -0800
Organization: UUCP San Diego, CA

In <rccarm00.724959536@mik.uky.edu> rccarm00@nx19.mik.uky.edu (ron c carman) writes:
>      I recently established a new mail/news feed, and have managed to
>get mail running in both directions, but when I try to send mail to
>darmok.UUCP (that's my site) from Internet, the mail always bounces.
>Error responses say "unable to find remote address", or words to that
>effect.  
>      I spoke to the person in charge of mail for our site, and his
>response was to ask about the configuration of mail at my end.  I don't
>think the problem could possibly be at my end; I've been over the static
>file a dozen times, and it seems to be set up just fine.
>      Any help will be greatly appreciated.

This may be a dumb question, but have you filed a UUCP map entry with 
Rutgers? i.e. :
>TO: <uucpmap@rutgers.edu>                                   DATE: 11/23/92
>                                                            TIME:  8:14 AM
>CC: BLUE, Bill (CRASH)

>SUBJECT: UUPC Map Entry

>#N      nadir
>#S      DATEL 386 PC DOS 5.0 & Waffle 1.65
>#O      Personal System
>#C      Rudy Crespin
>#E      nadir!crespin
>#T      619-553-9420
>#P      San Diego, CA
>#L      32 40 00 N / 117 10 00 W
>#R      No uucp connections available at this time.
>#W      nadir!crespin (Rudy J. Crespin); Sat Nov 21 08:01:01 PST 1992
>#U      crash (very limited)
>#
>nadir   crash(DAILY)

Sorry if I'm insulting your intelligence.
Rudy.

-- 
                                                      _           _
   ---   O       | Rudy Crespin                    | / \ |\ | __ / \ |\ |
   --   <^-      | crespin@nadir.uucp              | \_/ | \|    \_/ | \|
  --  -\/\       | crash!nadir!crespin             | 
  ---     \      |                                 |- No-No, it is On-On.
From: phil@miracle.com (Phil Hill)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: The woes of ^Z
Date: 22 Dec 92 08:33:11 GMT
Organization: Miracle Computer Consultants

roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail) writes:
>Well, as McLuhan said, "the medium is the message."  You're technically
>correct, Phil.  But, as a practical matter, where does one separate a
>filesystem from the methods available to access that filesystem?

My point is that Waffle is using the *default* text method to access the
DOS files.  If Waffle used binary mode, it wouldn't stop reading at the
^Z.  Of course it's more of a pain to access in bindry mode, you have to
manually scan for new-lines.

>Besides, the filesystem IS broken.  (11-character filenames, arranged
>8.3, with no case sensitivity)  So, if you ran Unix, OS/2 or MAC access
>routines on a DOS filesystem, you still wouldn't overcome its
>shortcomings.

Well... it isn't broken.  It works.  It doesn't work very well, or have many
nice features.  But it isn't boken.

>
>This is leaving the Waffle domain.  Perhaps we should take it to
>alt.religion.computers?

No.  I'm still in the Waffle domain.  The original complaint was that ^Z
chopped off a news message.  We got the answer: "It's DOS's fault, it
treats ^Z as EOF".  My answer is: "It's Waffle's fault for trusting DOS's
default access mode".  If it this was an important issue, it could be easily
fixed.  The question is: "Is it worth the effort to fix Waffle?"  I don't
think that ^Z in news messages is a major problem.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Phil Hill                     | "All you people in TV land,           |
| Miracle Computer Consultants  |   I will wake up your empty shells.   |
|                               |  Peak time viewing blown in a flash,  |
|                               |   as I burn into your memory cells.   |
| Email: phil@miracle.com       |  'cause I'm alive." - Peter Gabriel   |
From: larry@Birdsong.Suvl.CA.US (Lawrence T. Hardiman)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Archive-Server Requests to Halcyon.COM
Date: 1 Jan 93 17:08:09 GMT
Reply-To: larry@Birdsong.Suvl.CA.US
Organization: The Birdsong Company, PO Box 2031, Sunnyvale CA 94087-2031

In <4B0NwB1w165w@polarbear.rahul.net> coneill@polarbear.rahul.net (Chris O'Neill) writes:
>> > Most failed requests to the archive-server (ANY archive-server)
>> > are due to incorrect format of the request....
> ... Here's what I do...
>begin
>get waffle/whatever/neatstuf.zip
>end
>The "end" tells halcyon to stop processing, so it doesn't barf on my signature
>lines.

Yes, I know, halcyon.com is a Unix box. Now for a *REAL* archive server :-)
You can use ftpmail@remote.halcyon.com, a DOS box with DOS Waffle and WFS.
WFS is considerably more forgiving on command syntax than the MBAS on halcyon.com.
Say: "help" in the message body. Don't worry about signatures, case, column position.

Last I heard, everything on halcyon.com is available at remote.halcyon.com.
Izzat it, Ralph? :-)

Regards,
  larry.

-- 
--
Larry@Birdsong.Suvl.CA.US
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
From: ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims)
Subject: Re: Archive-Server Requests to Halcyon.COM
Organization: Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 17:30:51 GMT

jerryg@jaiser.rain.com (Jerry Gaiser) writes:

>ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims) writes:

>> Most failed requests to the archive-server (ANY archive-server)
>> are due to incorrect format of the request.  In the case of the

>And as I discovered last night, don't append a signature because the
>server craps out with too many errors.

Placing the word 'quit' (no quotes, of course) as the last command
in the requests stops processing at that point, so the sig file gets
ignored.  There's a lot of stuff in 'help' that's worth reading.
If it wouldn't be unmanageable, a database of requestors could be
kept and a help file sent to anyone making a request that wasn't
in the current database.

"Docs?  We don't need no steenkin' docs, man!"


-- 
     halcyon.com, Public Access Internet, Seattle, WA, +1 206 382 6245
                 "A World of Information at your Fingertips"
                 P.O. Box 555, Grapeview, WA 98546-0555, USA
                    ralphs@halcyon.com,  +1 206 955 1050
Xref: sparky comp.bbs.waffle:5462 comp.mail.uucp:2396
From: bob@1776.COM (Robert Coe)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle,comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Mixed format addresses
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 12:23:14 EST
Distribution: world
Organization: 1776 Enterprises, Sudbury MA

jhood@smoke.marlboro.vt.us (Lord Yertle) writes:
> lance@Circle.Raleigh.NC.US (Lance A. Brown) writes:
> 
> >OK, now for the fun part.  Finding a new MX site that is willing to 
> >forward your mail.  I'd be worried about finding an Internet site nearby 
> >UUCP-wise that will MX for anybody.
> 
> You have to do this before you send the (re)registration in.  It's
> kind of pointless otherwise, and I'm not sure they'd let you do it.

There really is a "Catch 22".  You need an operational MX in order to regis-
ter, but until you've registered, you can't be absolutely sure that your site 
name doesn't conflict with someone else's.  If you have a really good rela-
tionship with your MX site, you can at least get them to do a "whois" for 
you, and this will identify a conflicting site name that has fully percolated 
into the system.  But until you've actually registered, you can't be sure 
that someone won't beat you to the name.

   ___            _                                           -  Bob
   /__) _   /    / ) _   _
(_/__) (_)_(_)  (___(_)_(/_______________________________________ bob@1776.COM
Robert K. Coe ** 14 Churchill St, Sudbury, Massachusetts 01776 ** 508-443-3265
From: rider@geloser.login.qc.ca (Serge Ayotte)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Helldiver under WIN-OS/2...
Date: 30 Dec 92 23:54:37 GMT
Organization: Gentleman Loser System, Montreal/Qc/Cdn

Hiya folks!

He yeah, another OS/2 user that decided to give a try to Helldiver, and
I must say that after an afternoon of fooling around with, I am getting
impress.... BUT there is a few things that, to ME, are nagging...

1) The biggest nag is that I have to had to the GENERAL autoexec.bat the
SET WAFFLE line. For me this is a bad point, I'm in the habit of not
wanting superflous (i.e. memory hogging as small as it may be)
environment variable, TSR, drivers, ect... and that's what I love best
of OS/2, it's is "option" of putting special devices and stuff for a
specific session... OK, I'll admit that when it comes to stuff in
autoexec, sometimes you have to create a bat file for somethings
(example, my 2 batch file for the normal Waffle box, and the one for the
LOCAL logging that have the SET WAFFLE line for THOSE session only), but
I don't have that option or workaround for win-based prg's.

2) Is there any word wrap on this thing??? I've tried to post a message
earlier on and when writing it, I noticed that ther wasn't any wrapping
going on... Something I forgot?? (BTW, this message is NOT done or
posted via HD, I'm back in my LOCAL LOGIN BOX [Waffle is still going in
another] since another trouble encounter when trying HD, see later...)

3) Another nagging point is the fact that HD doesn't want to run in
seamless mode (for non-OS/2'ers, this mean running a Windows or DOS prg
on the OS/2 desktop without loading the previous mentionned full
screen). Keeps saying that it can't find the SET WAFFLE...(maybe related
to point 1 since even when loading the WIN-OS/2 full screen, that
autoexec gets loaded, but it doesn't when runnin seamless?? I'll be
asking about that in comp.os.os2.misc...).

4) LAstly, I CAN'T post from HD under WIN-OS/2. When I try to send a
message, I get a SYSTEM ERROR message mentionning that the program can
not be run under a WIN-OS/2 session (my deduction is the HSEND.EXE being
called is the culprit AND WIN-OS/2. It is knowned that you can't run
non-windows prg's in THIS version, it looks like in the next OS/2 [2.1
with win3.1 compatibility] this will be probably not a problem anymore,
but it is NOW!).
Anyone got it running correctly??

But basically I have to say this;

RHYS, you have my thanks and congratulations on a well done prg!!
NOw if I can get around the mentioned trouble I might keep it and
register...

TCTTYL!
Serge Ayotte

Old MacDonald had a computer, with EIA I/O...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| rider@geloser.login.qc.ca | Gentleman Loser System, Montreal, Qc, Canada |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky comp.bbs.waffle:5544 comp.bbs.misc:1643 alt.bbs:7721 news.software.readers:2553
From: slewis@whitebase.ukp.com (Scott Lewis)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.misc,alt.bbs,news.software.readers
Subject: Re: Blue Wave reader
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 92 14:41:19 EST
Organization: UKP Systems, Middletown, NJ

patlee@panix.com (Patrick Lee) writes:

> Blue Wave version 2.12 was released on December 17 and contained
> some more bug fixes.  v2.11 did have many bug fixes and some
> feature enhancements.  But I suppose that was not enough to
> warrant a big jump in the version number.

        Thanks for the information, I'll pick up a copy ASAP.
 
<< Scott >>

<< Scott Lewis >>

=================================================================
Internet Mail: slewis@whitebase.ukp.com | Captain, a Klingon does
 Fidonet Mail: Scott Lewis@1:107/407    | NOT play Tetris!
=================================================================
From: rat@ruth.UUCP (David Douthitt)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: Shroom and Waffle, mutual coexistence IS possible!
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 92 12:28:46 CST
Organization: Network XXIII - +1 608 222 9253

holmes@gorilla.nbn.com (Tim Holmes) writes:

| Yes, I have the same problem.  Plus some others.  Does anyone
| out there have a copy of BBStevie *before* 2.2?  If so, I would
| like to get hold of a copy. 

I think I have it ... but this is Good??  I seem to be running v2.0.
However, uploading into the editor is ****** because it barfs and
chokes - runs out of memory - sometimes to the point of bringing the
bbs down entirely and locking up the machine.  All because the nit
couldn't get enough memory.  ARRGGGHHH!!!!! 


--
UUCP: ....!fullfeed.com!ruth!rat        |  Network XXIII - +1 608 222 9253
InterNet: rat@ruth.UUCP                 |  80Megs+ of Usenet/Fido programs!
Fidonet: David Douthitt 1:121/23        |
"...because appealing to the masses has |  Files available more ways than
 never appealed to us."                 |  any other BBS in America!
Files via: anon uucp, Fidonet FREQ, mail to archive-server@ruth.uucp, etc.
Xref: sparky comp.bbs.waffle:5596 comp.bbs.misc:1646
From: rat@ruth.UUCP (David Douthitt)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.misc
Subject: Re: .QWK mail reader for Waffle
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 03:22:37 CST
Organization: Network XXIII - +1 608 222 9253

abolins%visavis.uucp@nyongwa.cam.org (August Abolins) writes:

| I personally prefer Deluxe2; it's faaaaasssst and has an "uncluttered"
| interface.

Deluxe2?  Don't you mean Deluxe-"squared"?  The *ONLY* QWK-reader with
a name that is illegal in Fidonet and possibly in parts of Usenet?

Last time I tried to run it, it rang the bell several times a second,
locked up at various places, and refused to run PERIOD.  It's the worst
software I've seen to date - and I've run almost all of the available QWK
readers I could find.  As I remember, Deluxe also has THREE or FOUR
"GimmeMoney" screens to make you feel guilty.

Forget it - make a statement and use freeware that WORKS - like Offline
or Offline Express....

PS: I tried EVERYTHING to get Deluxe to run - right down to the *BAREST*
    MSDOS v5.0 set up - no disk cache, NO autoexec at all, no 4DOS...
    it STILL crashed.


--
UUCP: ....!fullfeed.com!ruth!rat        |  Network XXIII - +1 608 222 9253
InterNet: rat@ruth.UUCP                 |  80Megs+ of Usenet/Fido programs!
Fidonet: David Douthitt 1:121/23        |
"...because appealing to the masses has |  Files available more ways than
 never appealed to us."                 |  any other BBS in America!
Files via: anon uucp, Fidonet FREQ, mail to archive-server@ruth.uucp, etc.
From: steveh@grafex.Cupertino.CA.US (Steve Harding KA6ETB)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: rmail not accepting % hacks
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 93 16:09:14 -0800
Organization: The GRAFex Company

In <kRcTwB3w165w@cybrspc.UUCP> roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu (Roy M. Silvernail) writes:
>dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz (Kennelmeister) writes:

>> For some reason rmail is doing nasty things to addresses with % hacks in
>> them.
>> 
>> As an example, mail addressed to foo%bar.uucp@buzz is being sent to
>> foo.uucp@buzz
>> 
>> Anyone know how to deal with this problem?

>4dos, right?  Rmail and the Waffle utility suite all know how to handle
>command lines so this doesn't happen.  BUT... if you are using a
>third-party accessory program that calls rmail, you may see this effect.
>It means the external program is passing a command to rmail with the
>system() command.  Bad stuff, Maynard!

Actually, it may not be a 4dos problem.  It could be that bar.uucp is
incorrectly listed in the paths file.  Should be listed thusly:

bar		buzz!bar.uucp!%s
bar.uucp	buzz!bar.uucp!%s

This'll force anything sent to bar to go to buzz with the correct address.

Then again...if it is 4dos then your suggestion is correct.

Question:  did 1.65 solve the stamp file problem with 4dos?  (I am not
a user.)

steve

-- 
-- 
play:steveh@grafex.Cupertino.CA.US 408.252.0578     work:harding@nas.nasa.gov
              A prince trapped in the body of a dirty old man.
From: root@rebell.rmt.sub.org (Gottfried Hamm)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Problems with nwreader and helldiver
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 92 21:58:39 MEZ
Reply-To: root@rebell.rmt.sub.org (Gottfried Hamm)
Organization: rebell * +49 6249 8842 * D-6524 Guntersblum

Hi there,

I have two problems with nwreader and helldiver:

1. When I want to post an article with nwreader, it will only post the 
   signature-file and the text will be lost.

2. In helldiver under Windows 3.1 I never see the contents of the newsgroups
   neither using join nor newsrc.

Has anyone experiences with these programs and can help me?
Apreciating any help!

Happy new year, Gottfried

+---------------------+----------------------------------+--------------+
| Gottfried Hamm      |  Email: root@rebell.rmt.sub.org  |     I'm      |
| Wormser Str. 36     |  Phone: +49 6249 8997            |   awaiting   |
| D-6524 Guntersblum  |  Fax  : +49 6249 8842            | your mail... |
+---------------------+----------------------------------+--------------+
From: russell@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Russell Schulz)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Announce: procc v0.4 - process control messages
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 17:44:57 MST
Organization: Private System, Edmonton, AB, Canada
X-Newsreader: rusnews v0.97

a substantial upgrade to procc v0.3 has been placed on halcyon.com and
should be available as /pub/waffle/news/procc-04.zip (replacing the
procc-03.zip that's there now) eventually.

it lets you selectively choose which actions to perform, updates your
waffle/words/usenet and waffle/system/usenet files on newgroups and
rmgroups (newgroups give you descriptions and can do moderated groups)
-- 
Russell Schulz  russell@alpha3.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca  ersys!rschulz  Shad 86c
From: jhm@hourglas.uucp (Jonathan Hulley-Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: trn type newsreader for DOS ?
Date: 21 Dec 92 14:33:03 GMT
Organization: Informatix BBS System - Ridgewood, NJ, USA

Is there a trn type newsreader available for DOS ? If so, does anyone have
it available in the US ? Thanks.

Jonathan

____                                                      ____
\/\/     (jhm@hourgls.fidonet.org, jhm@hourglas.uucp)     \/\/
-=*"Remember HATE is not a family value. Boycott Colorado"*=-
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
From: nrc@cbnews.cb.att.com (N. Richard Caldwell)
Subject: Re: WafflineMail with Waffle 1.65..does it work?
Organization: AT&T Network Systems  -  Columbus, Ohio
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 20:00:21 GMT

From article <FkXgwB4w165w@cithara.login.qc.ca>, by william@cithara.login.qc.ca:

>  Of course your /extern/wafmail should be similar to the following:
> 
> ====/waffle/extern/wafmail===================================
> 
> /local /log /shell /command="c:\bin\wm.bat %b %d %O %A %W" /then="echo %|%|%C"
> 
> Thanks again to Richard Caldwell. Hope you don't mind my sharing it
> here.

I don't mind at all.  Thanks for saving me the trouble of reposting
it.

> No guarantees these files will work on your system.

Note, for example, that I echo the messages about mail being exploded
directly to COM1.  I have no idea why this is necessary but it works
for me.  I tried avoiding it by removing the local switch with some
goofy results. 

Thanks to B. Rahardjo <budi@bison.mb.ca> for kindly providing the
explode utility.  I believe it's available on the usual servers.  If
it's not, it should be!
From: gwp@dithots.Gwinnett.COM (George W. Pogue)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Fossil vs Not
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 13:44:07 EST
Reply-To: gwp@dithots.Gwinnett.COM (George W. Pogue)
Organization: Deep In The Heart Of The South!


  What is the reason for using a Fossil driver vs Native modes? A friend of
  mine said that fossil was originally designed to increase performance of
  modem communications, how true is this? 

  Please email a copy of the response, my feed has been getting purged from
  my host.

  bill

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Buy American! The Job You Save Could Be Your Own! Sell American Too!
 gwp@dithots.Gwinnett.COM (George W. Pogue)  Deep In The Heart Of The South!
 User Calls: 810      User Posts: 339    Waffle Version: 1.65
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: jerryg@jaiser.rain.com (Jerry Gaiser)
Newsgroups: comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: WafflineMail with Waffle 1.65..does it work?
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 10:53:38 PST
Organization: Jerry's Attic, Gaston OR

ranfry@mala.proteus.qc.ca (Ranfry) writes:

> In <Bzu9pK.Cp2@eis.calstate.edu> afavela@eis.calstate.edu (Alonso Favela) wri
> >	Does wafflinemail 1.0 work with waffle 1.65. In the docs it said
> >that it worked with 1.64, and since there are different mailbox
> >structures, I wanted to ask before I might mess things up. Does anyone
> >have WaffLineMail working with 1.65?  
> 
> Speaking for myself, NO.  That is I never was able to make Waffline 1.0 
> work with Waffle 1.65.  I someone HAS been able, please tell me and Alonso
> how.

Well, I got it to work with 1.65. Unfortunately it doesn't understand 1.65's
mailbox concept. I still have it available for those that want it for
newsgroups.

--
Jerry Gaiser (jerryg@jaiser.rain.com)              (voice) 503-359-4017
Fidonet 1:105/380                                    (bbs) 503-359-5111
PBBS n7pwf@n7pwf.or.usa.na
                                                 .. I read banned books ..