HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sbo@vlsi.polymtl.ca (Stephane Boucher)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Stephane et les noms...
Date: 4 Apr 92 16:20:58 GMT
Organization: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Canada

In article <1992Apr3.094458.4768@ac.dal.ca> galbrth@ac.dal.ca writes:

   Stephane Boucher ecrit:

   >Oh, et pendant que j'y suis, j'attend toujours Gerald. Que veut-dire le P
   >dans Gerald "P" Heckman?

   Mais Stephane, qulle est ta facination avec les noms.
   En premier, c'est `Frank' ou `Robin'.  
   Maintenant c'est l'initial de Gerald...

En fait, ca a commence a ve Gerry. Par courrier electronique je lui avait
pose la question. Ca m'a toujours intrigue de voir les gens mettre
seulement l'initial. Pourquoi ne pas mettre le nom au complet? 

Pour ce qui est de Frank (Robin?) j'aimerais juste savoir a qui m'adresser.
Lorsque tu me parles tu sais que je m'appelle Stephane. Mais si je signais
Marc alors que dans mon adresse tu trouvais Stephane Boucher, ne serais-tu
pas tente de me demander quel est le bon nom?

    _____________________________________________________________________________
    Peter (S.) Galbraith  [Phone: (902) 494-7007] |  GALBRTH@AC.DAL.CA (InterNet)

Parlant de "middle name", quelle est la signification du S dans Peter S
Galbraith (Je viens juste de remarquer le S :-))?
--
  ,                          ,                           ,
Stephane Boucher, ing. jr. | Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
sbo@vlsi.polymtl.ca        | 
sbo@info.polymtl.ca        | (514)340-5950
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Alberta Conservatives & Bilingualism
From: kmcvay@oneb.wimsey.bc.ca (Ken Mcvay)
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 07:26:28 GMT
Distribution: can
Organization: The Old Frog's Almanac, Vancouver Island

In article <1992Apr2.033204.19689@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:

>Getty is only adopting a stand similar to Quebec nationalists...and
>I disagree with both of them...Getty only is adopting a milder form
>of the unilingualism espoused by Quebec nationalists.

I think Getty is simply taking the only position a Western Canadian
premier _can_ take and keep his job. 

Barring some major miracle, I believe that British Columbians will reject 
outright any constitutional change that does not include the EEE senate, 
or which grants special powers to any province. Any politician who 
stood up to urge another position would be committing political suicide. 
Perhaps it is the same in Alberta.

Whenever I receive mail (usually from Ontario or Quebec) which says
that a EEE senate would be "unfair" because it would grant equal power
to provinces barely the size of a "real" city, I can only wonder that
folks back east haven't grasped the reality yet that that is EXACTLY
why we favour EEE - the Western view of its domination by Montreal and
Toronto, correct or not, is probably unshakable at this point, and
folks who believe otherwise are in for a rude shock when our referenda
are held.


-- 
------------------------------+ The Old Frog's Almanac - Vancouver Island  
If it WALKS like nazi trash   |  "ELIMINATED" by the BASSET CONSPIRACY!
and it TALKS like nazi trash  +-------------------------------------------
it's probably just B-CPU...   | (SOME trash ain't WORTH recycling, folks!)
From: migod@turing.toronto.edu (Mike Godfrey)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Queen of Canada
Date: 15 Apr 92 19:22:34 GMT
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto

In article <WARKENT.92Apr15110656@ltisun9.epfl.ch> warkent@ltisun9.epfl.ch (Ken Warkentyne) writes:
>In article <1992Apr14.180738.7227@bmerh2.bnr.ca> nadeau@bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau) wrote:
>> Anyway, if we "turf the old biddy", what symbol do you propose in
>> her place?  (And I think we do need some symbol - I will not pledge
>> allegiance to the current government, or to the existing country of
>> Canada, but I will do so for the "ideal" Canada, the country as it
>> strives to be in its best moments.)
>
>Je propose que le Canada choisisse un elan comme chef d'etat.
>
>I propose that Canada choose a moose as head of state.

How about Cornelius the rhinocerous from the Granby zoo?
He does need a job, since his party folded....

-- 
Mike Godfrey   	           		"Either that wallpaper goes, or I do."
Dept of Comp Sci, UofT      	         	-- allegedly, the last words
migod@turing.toronto.edu			   of Oscar Wilde
Newsgroups: can.politics
From: schamber@watserv1.waterloo.edu (CHAMBERLAND S - BIOLOGY)
Subject: Re: Les immigrants et les purs
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 00:07:18 GMT

In article <9715@s3.ireq.hydro.qc.ca> beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Denis Beauregard) writes:
>
>Petite intermede, dans l'Annuaire du Canada 1992, il y a une liste
>des faits marquants depuis 1867.  On y parle de la rebellion de 1885,
>mais pas de la pendaison de Riel.  On y parle de la loi 101 au Quebec,
>mais pas du regelement 17 en Ontario ni des interdictions du francais
>comme langue d'enseignement en dehors du Quebec.  On y parle de la
>formation du PQ, mais pas du Reform Party, du CoR, de l'APEC ou de
>toutes ces organisations anti-francais, ou encore de l'interdiction
>du francais a Moncton (malgre 40% de francos) en 1969 par le maire Jones.
>Ceci est en 1992.  Tant que le Canada fera porter au Quebec le blame
>en filtrant les evenements officiels, comment en tant que Quebecois
>voulez-vous que je me sente canadien?  Je suis au banc des accuses
>alors que lorsque je suis victime, on passe le tout sous silence ou
>en attenuant.  
>-- 
>    Denis Beauregard       _ _ _ _  Collecting Beauregard/Jarret/Jarest/Vincent
>beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca | * | * | Promoting use of QC as Quebec Postal Code
>  Andre Jarret, sieur de  |===|===| Mes opinions?  Oui, oui, les miennes!
>   Beauregard 1642-1992   |_*_|_*_| My opinions?  Yes, yes, mine!

Je suis parfaitement d'accord avec Denis.

Presentement, il est impossible pour moi de me sentir autre que Quebecois.

Sylvain Chamberland    
Dept. of Biology
University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario.
From: 881277m@ace.acadiau.ca (WALLACE MCLEAN)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Garfield Warren's aborted resolution
Keywords: newfoundland and labrador
Date: 9 Apr 92 23:55:18 GMT
Organization: Acadia University

An update:

	Yesterday (Wednesday, April 8th) Garfield Warren (PC-Torngat 
Mountains) was to have tabled a private member's resolution in the 
Newfoundland House of Assembly.
	The resolution would have called for:
	a) the provincial government to oppose any attempt to remove 
Labrador as a separate federal electoral district, and
	b) the provincial government to change the name of the province of 
Newfoundland to Newfoundland and Labrador.
	Alas, the weather intervened. A massive snow, sleet, and rain storm 
knocked out power to the Avalon Peninsula. Wednesday's business was 
postponed until next Wednesday. Which is just as well, since Wells and Ed 
Roberts were both in Halifax attending the constitutional conference. Maybe 
they will be in the House when it discusses Warren's resolution next week.
	It is expected that, although all three parties have agreed in 
principal to the name change, the Liberals will amend the motion to strike a 
parliamentary committee to investigate the possibility. In talking with 
Labrador MP Bill Rompkey, it appears that this is merely a formality, and 
the committee is not likely to reject the idea of recognizing the 
geographical reality that the province is comprised of both an island called 
Newfoundland and a mainland chunk called Labrador.
	Just hoping that the committee reports back before the House 
adjourns for the summer. I want to go home to a new province.
Newsgroups: can.politics
From: nadeau@bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: French in france
Date: 16 Apr 92 03:45:43 GMT
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa, Canada

In article <1992Apr15.225658.22220@bmerh2.bnr.ca> robinc@bnr.ca (Robin Collins) writes:
>In article <11479@std-2> audetf@Software.Mitel.COM (Francois Audet) writes:
>>
>>Because, at that time, it was richer. This was at the very beginning
>>of the colony. Quebec City was composed of french people from all over
>>France (although concentrated in a few major area): therefore the
>>language was "enrichi" of the differents variation (mini-dialects) of
>>french in France.  [ ... ]
>
>Linguists dispute the idea of richer, except in terms of abundance
>of vocabulary. There is no such thing as one language with an equal
>number of terms being richer than another language or dialect.

Frank, that was exactly Francois' point - that early Canadian French
was influenced by various French dialects, and thus contained more
terms and phrases.  This is precisely your definition of "richer"...

The Rhealist (Rheal Nadeau)                 |  Bell-Northern Research
Internet:  nadeau@bnr.ca                    |  Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 
BNR neither endorses nor censors my views   |  (613) 763-4266
Organization: Queen's University at Kingston
Date: Thursday, 16 Apr 1992 11:10:26 EDT
From: <QPID@QUCDN.QueensU.CA>
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Queen of Canada
Distribution: can
 <1992Apr15.022025.14281@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>
 <1992Apr15.130754.17153@bnr.ca> <1992Apr15.224705.21930@bmerh2.bnr.ca>

The British Royalty have one true great benefit both here and in England, they
generate endless amounts of revenue through magazines, papers etc.  Officially
they have no domain over either country.  As a Canadian I can understand why th
ose Canadians whose heritage traces back to England would like to keep the Quee
n as part of Canada.  However, it should be rembered that Canada is comprised o
f many cultures that do not have as close ties to the Monarch and would like to
 see Canada entirly independent of any ties to Britian and the Royalty.  As for
 myself, a Canadian with an East-Indian heritage I have no great desire to keep
 Canada tied to the Monarchy in Britain.


Anu Gupta
Queen's University (simply a name of an institution, not an ownership by Monarc
hy)
QPID@QUCDN
From: robinc@bnr.ca (Robin Collins)
Subject: Re: Canada, 2 nations.
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa, Canada
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 14:38:23 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.151954.3717@cunews.carleton.ca> rwood@superior.carleton.ca (Richard Wood) writes:
>In article <1992Apr10 schamber@watserv1.waterloo.edu (CHAMBERLAND S - BIOLOGY) writes:
>>   For us, there is no such thing as "the nation of Canada". there is 2
>>   nations, and as long as TROCians won't recognize this, sorry, but
>>   there will be troubles...
>>Sylvain Chamberland
>>Dept. of Biology
>>University of Waterloo
>>Waterloo, Ontario.
>>
>
>  My opinion exactly.  There are two nations, but TROCers are determined to
>press ahead with the pretence that there is only one Canada, requiring that all 
>10 components must be equal.  The end of this road will probably be something
>like a Commonwealth of Independent Provinces.
>  Quebec is not the same and should, I think, stand apart from the other 9 with 
>some form of independence (with a TROC equally independent of Quebec).
>  There will never be a united Canada.  What I want is a united TROC.


I think the two-nation theory of Canada is a myth.
I accept that there is a Quebec nation within Canada. I reject the 
concept of english-canadian nation.  

But TROC? I surely don't consider myself in such terms.In fact, the concept
is self-contradictory. HOw can you define a *nation* in terms of what has
been removed from it. I will accept that Canada is a country in which
there exists a nation, Quebec. The rest of the equation is in limbo,
and I kind of like it that way. 
Canada has the potential of becoming something other than just another
nation, defined by ethnic history. It can become a nation defined by
citizenship alone.

There are canadians who speak english,
but that does not make them (or ME) english-canadian.
Many many canadians speak english out of convenience, not because it
is their mother tongue. At the time of confederation (1867) Canada was
ethnically french, then irish (english was way down the list).
Aboriginals don't apparently fit into the 2-nation theory either.

The one-nation theory of one unilingual english-canada is equally
repugnant, but that does not require us to accept a fallacious 2-nation
theory (or 3-nation theory now.)
This numerical game seems awfully arbitrary and divisive .

Frank.
From: audetf@Software.Mitel.COM (Francois Audet)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Bourassa is my hero
Date: 8 Apr 92 13:52:26 GMT
Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada.

In article (John Alsop) writes:
->I was a student in Montreal at the time, and I can assure you that the
->anglophone community was 99.9% in support of Trudeau's move. (Of course
->anglophone opinions don't count for anything anymore!).

Yeah right... 

->I don't know about others of my generation from Montreal, but I still get
->nervous walking past mailboxes!

Especially if there is an RCMP officer in the neibourhoud.


-- 
Francois Audet
Telephone: (613) 592-2121 x1754
Internet: Francois.Audet@software.Mitel.COM
Newsgroups: can.politics
From: robinc@bnr.ca (Robin Collins)
Subject: Re: Alberta Conservatives & Bilingualism
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa, Canada
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 16:20:16 GMT

In article <337@catnix.UUCP> michele@catnix.UUCP (Michele A. Simond) writes:
>
>In article <1992Apr3.000638.16902@splunge.uucp> adrian@splunge.uucp (Adrian
>(Adrian Ashley) writes:
>>
>>[...]Given that Canadians appear to
>     want a multilingual nation, [...]
> 
>If this perception is true, I cannot help but wonder how Canada
>could handle a multilingual nation when it has so much problems
>handling two.
>
>And I can almost hear the uproar about multilingual
>cereal boxes.  Poor Rice Crispies' boxes... J'entends deja
>la cacophonie... :-}}}


The world is multilingual, isn't it?
We aren't always killing each other, and we buy each others products.
Usually the killing isn't done on the basis of language (at least not
until recently, when the kind of narrowness we see in this country
is mirrored by similar ethnic narrowness world-wide.)

Frank.

Newsgroups: can.politics,soc.culture.canada
From: sbo@vlsi.polymtl.ca (Stephane Boucher)
Subject: Re: When do we stop being outsiders? (WAS Re: The Journal on ...)
Organization: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Canada
	<1992Apr10.011017.17271@watserv1.waterloo.edu>
	<1992Apr11.015743.15715@unixg.ubc.ca>
Date: 11 Apr 92 15:55:38

In article <1992Apr11.015743.15715@unixg.ubc.ca> lermer@theory.chem.ubc.ca (Noah Lermer) writes:

   On a related note, I also feel that this is one of the problems
   english-speaking Canada has with the phrase "distinct". In english this
   connotes being "better" to my ears. For example, being "someone of
   distinction" means being (recognised as) better than your fellows. In
   french, <<distinct>> seems to me to translate much more closely to
   "different". A "different society" clause and "distinct socitey" clause
   seem very different.

According to my English dictionnary (Webster's Dictionnary 1978 edition)
here are some definitions:

distinct: a. of marked difference; separate; clear; well-defined;
	  obvious; precise.
distinction: n. separation; that which indicates individuality; eminence;
	     repute; mark of honor bestowed for merit.
distinctive: a. marking distinction or difference.

According to my French dictionnary (Petit Larousse Illustre' 1984):

distinct, e: adj. Qui se perc,oit ou se conc,oit nettement, clair, net. 
	     Diffe'rent.

This means that distinct DOES NOT connote being "better". Distinctive, on
the other hand, DOES connote being "better". 

Also, I suggest that you check your English dictionnary. In English their
CAN be multiple nations within a country.

What does this all mean? It means that "Les te^tes carre'es" are the only
ones to be blamed for the constitutionnal crisis :-).
--
  ,                          ,                           ,
Stephane Boucher, ing. jr. | Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
sbo@vlsi.polymtl.ca        | 
sbo@info.polymtl.ca        | (514)340-5950
From: beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Denis Beauregard)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Le parti Rhinoceros
Date: 16 Apr 92 16:12:13 GMT
Organization: Hydro-Quebec

Le parti rhinoceros est le fruit de Jacques Ferron et sa propriete
personnelle.  Quand Ferron est decede, le parti est decede avec lui.

Voila pourquoi il n'y a plus de candidats rhinoceros.

Et le parti rhinoceros, a cote de la politique de je-m'en-foutisme
de la chose politique federale, a applique systematiquement une
fin de non-recevoir au federalisme.  Il ne s'est jamais presente
sur la scene quebecoise parce que la politique faite chez nous
nous atteint.  Mais, il a presente des candidats au federal, parce que
nous n'avons rien de serieux a faire la.

Et dire qu'une de nos federalistes du reseau utilise le rhinoceros comme
symbole!  Eh oui, le rhino, meme s'il a presente des candidats en dehors
du Quebec, n'est pas federaliste.


-- 
    Denis Beauregard       _ _ _ _  Collecting Beauregard/Jarret/Jarest/Vincent
beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca | * | * | Promoting use of QC as Quebec Postal Abbrev 
  Andre Jarret, sieur de  |===|===| Mes opinions?  Oui, oui, les miennes!
   Beauregard 1642-1992   |_*_|_*_| My opinions?  Yes, yes, mine!
Newsgroups: can.politics
From: rwood@alfred.carleton.ca (Richard Wood)
Subject: Re: Canada, 2 nations.
Organization: Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 18:28:48 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.200648.4949@ac.dal.ca> galbrth@ac.dal.ca writes:

>rwood@superior.carleton.ca (Richard Wood) writes
>>   There will never be a united Canada.  What I want is a united TROC.
>
>Oh pleeeeease.
>Guess you've never travelled east of Ontario, have you?
>or North of Ottawa?

Been in every Province and Territory, many times over.

>This idea that TROC is a well defined `english Canada' is utter BS.

I certainly don't think TROC is a well-defined 'english Canada'.  But I do
believe that the alternative to unity is disintigration, and since Quebec
won't play, we in TROC will have to do it ourselves.

>It's posts like this that make my stomach turn.

Maybe you should try EX-LAX.

> _____________________________________________________________________________
> Peter Galbraith       [Phone: (902) 494-7007] |  GALBRTH@AC.DAL.CA (InterNet)
> Dept. of Oceanography,  Dalhousie University  |  GALBRTH@DALAC     (BitNet)
> Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 4J1         |  rhogee@dalcs      (UUCP)

--
Richard Wood  :  rwood@ccs.carleton.ca 
       Computing and Communications Services
               Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6
From: golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: O Canada, O Quebec  - reaction
Date: 13 Apr 92 13:43:26 GMT
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department

In article <1992Apr13.005631.8885@watserv1.waterloo.edu> schamber@watserv1.waterloo.edu (CHAMBERLAND S - BIOLOGY) writes:
>In article <1992Apr10.163958.6038@bmerh2.bnr.ca> robinc@bnr.ca (Robin Collins) writes:
>>Being one of the few people who has apparently bothered to
>>read the book, I have difficulty understanding how ANYBODY
>>can claim that this book is hate literature or really so
>>offensive. 
>>
>>I read it, enjoyed it and recommend it.
>>Richler doesn't play footsie with the chauvinists outside of
>>Quebec either. He craps equally on the APEC dinosaurs as he
>>does their equivalent in Quebec, his own province.
>
>Precisely. But newspapers talk only about the bad parts of Quebec.
>We just see "the head of the coin".
>
>Richler is only guilty of bad timing. He should never have written
>such a book in the middle of a constitution crisis...    :)

The time to engage in a debate is while the issue is still unsettled...
the timing of the book is most appropriate.  

>The book may be used against Quebec by chauvinists...

How...Quebec nationalists claim this...but how can a book which
comdemns intolerance and stupid unilingualist policies be used by
bigots?  

Gerald
From: nadeau@bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Freedom of Expression / language law oppressive?
Date: 15 Apr 92 15:49:37 GMT
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa, Canada

In article <WARKENT.92Apr15111819@ltisun9.epfl.ch> warkent@ltisun9.epfl.ch (Ken Warkentyne) writes:
>
>In article <1992Apr10.160848.4567@bmerh2.bnr.ca> robinc@bnr.ca (Robin Collins) wrote:
>rc> If you accept the basic liberal (small l) principles of the Rights of Man,
>rc> then you must accept the idea of freedom of expression being fundamental.
>rc> If not, then why do you bother to debate at all?
>
>Robin, you still refuse to answer my question: what is "freedom of
>expression"?

Just to confuse things even further...

One ongoing debate about freedom of expression is:  does it apply to
individuals only, or to organisations/businesses as well?  Is a
business a legal entity, with the same rights as an individual.
(Would a business then have the right to vote?)

An obvious example:  laws against cigarette advertising.  Are these a
breach of freedom of expression, or does freedom of expression not
apply to tobacco companies?

The law on business signs is a law restricting business practices, not
one suppressing the rights of individuals.  And such laws are common
all over Canada - check your local or provincial restrictions on signs,
advertising, etc.

Does law 178 prevent John Doe (or Jean Labiche) from putting up a sign,
in any language he wishes, to express his views on some topic?  If so,
then it is clearly a violation of freedom of expression.  If not, if it
only applies to commercial practices, then the violation is nowhere
near as obvious.

The Rhealist (Rheal Nadeau)                 |  Bell-Northern Research
Internet:  nadeau@bnr.ca                    |  Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 
BNR neither endorses nor censors my views   |  (613) 763-4266
From: robinc@bnr.ca (Robin Collins)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: On Exaggeration
Date: 10 Apr 92 15:56:15 GMT
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa, Canada

In article <3463@disuns2.epfl.ch> riese@litsuns1.epfl.ch (Marc Riese) writes:
>Collins, Robin
>Netto, John
>Rouleau, Pierre
>and whoever...
>
>
>Gentlemen,
>
>Will you all kindly attempt to express yourselves in a mature, civilised way,
>avoid argumentum ad hominem, and thereby give the group readers a break.
>
>Comments welcome but flames to /dev/null.



Riese, Marc: could you be more specific?

Frank.
From: schamber@watserv1.waterloo.edu (CHAMBERLAND S - BIOLOGY)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: Le mirage avant le chaos
Date: 15 Apr 92 05:06:31 GMT
Organization: University of Waterloo

In article <1992Apr14.112541.5040@ac.dal.ca> galbrth@ac.dal.ca writes:
>schamber@watserv1.waterloo.edu (CHAMBERLAND S - BIOLOGY) writes
>
>|galbrth@ac.dal.ca writes:
>|>beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Denis Beauregard) ecrit
>|>
>|>|j'en ai rien a foutre, pas plus que le 1er juillet, ce sont des symboles
>|>|vides si tu n'y crois pas), mais ce symbolisme qui nous touche
>|>|(le Quebec utilise QC, alors le Canada utilisera QC aussi, on vous
>|>|appuie; une promotion pour que les calendriers faits par des
>|>|non-francos ou non-quebecois utilise les mots "Fete nationale du Quebec",
>|>
>|>Bon.  D'un trait tu te fout du 1er Juillet, et de l'autre tu te souci
>|>de le Canada ne publicise pas `la fete du Quebec' ???
>|>Pas tres consistent ton affaire!
>|>
>|>En plus, tous mes amis Quebecois appellent encore le 24 Juillet la fete de la
>|>St. Jean.  Alors revient en!
>|
>|Et alors?
>|
>|St-Jean est le patron des Quebecois!  On dit bien "Noel", pourtant
>|tout le monde sait que c'est la fete "a Jesus"!!!!!     :)
>
>Exactement!   L'usage common est encore St. Jean
>Et on ne voit pas `Fete `a Jesus' sur le calendrier.  On y voit `Noel'!
>
>Merci pour le coup de main!

Hahahahaha!

Moi qui pensait aider Denis...

1-0 pour Peter...   :)

> _____________________________________________________________________________
> Peter Galbraith       [Phone: (902) 494-7007] |  GALBRTH@AC.DAL.CA (InterNet)
> Dept. of Oceanography,  Dalhousie University  |  GALBRTH@DALAC     (BitNet)
> Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 4J1         |  rhogee@dalcs      (UUCP)

Sylvain Chamberland
Dept. of Biology
University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario.
Newsgroups: can.politics