HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kncarp@nicsn1.monsanto.com (Kevin N. Carpenter)
Subject: Coral Identification Book
Organization: Monsanto Company
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 17:45:21 GMT

I am looking for a good Coral Identification book.  Criteria are:
Dedicated to Corals, lots of color pictures, and hopefully some
information about each coral.

Suggestions please...

I've spotted a book called "Corals of the World", but the only thing
I know about it is its title and mail-order price ($29.95)...

--
Kevin Carpenter       Internet:  kncarp@nicsn1.monsanto.com
Monsanto Company 
St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.
Opinions expressed are those of the author, not the company he works for.
From: mstephens.520@postman.gsfc.nasa.gov (mark stephens)
Newsgroups: rec.aquaria
Subject: Re: POWER FILTERS
Date: 21 Aug 92 15:22:11 GMT
Organization: nasa/gsfc

Oh poop, I don't even own an Aquaclear, my office mate does.  AND if I did
of course, I would not let that sponge clog... now would I?  (grin)

                mark


In article <1992Aug21.134958.4728@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, pprior@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul A Prior) writes:
> 
> In article <1992Aug20.123236.7597@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov> mstephens.520@postman.gsfc.nasa.gov (mark stephens) writes:
> >After suffering thru maintaining the old dynaflow filters, the one
> >with a 'real' moter at the base, I thought that the Whisper filters
> >were the best thing since sliced bread.  They were self starting!!!
> >Wow, what a concept.  They also are fairly whimpy filtration wise
> >and the water fall effect can be a nuisence.  Then I got an Ehiem canister
> >and have never look at another Whisper/aquaclear again.  The canister
> >allowed me to keep a tank in the living room (and my sig other!).
> >
> >One problem with the Aquaclear is the sponge, when it gets cloged, tends to 
> >float up and have caused water to get out of the filter.  
> 
> Well, Mark, if you're waiting till the darn sponge is -clogged-, then
> you need to clean it out anyway! <big grin!>.  I really like the 
> aquaclears for the sponge factor.  Makes for a stable biofiltration bed.
> 
> 
> -- 
> --------pprior@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu----(614) 621-8240----------------
> Paul A. Prior    Ban anchors, not reef tanks   "With friends like this,   
> 3rd year medical student		          who needs anemones?"
> The Ohio State U. College of Medicine   Tobacco Kills- Please don't smoke!
> 
> 
Newsgroups: rec.aquaria
From: rivan@bnr.ca (Robert Ivan)
Subject: re:, Aquarium backings
Reply-To: rivan@bnr.ca
Organization: Bell Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 13:57:30 GMT



   Forget the paint idea.  Any plastics shop can provide you with
a variety of colours of acrylic. For instance There are about 6 shades
of blue, a bunch of greens, oranges ... etc whatever does it for you.
Just simply get a sheet of the stuff cut to fit your tank.  Probably
1/16 inch thick would work.  Then Either put it on the back of the tank or
on the inside ( its easy to brush algea off of).
 Depending on the size required and thickness it shouldn't be more then
20 - 30 dollars ( there is a wide variety in prices between stores so
let your fingers do the walking).  Also you may be able to get a scrap peice.
The coulours of acrylic is very even and because it is removable
probably the best bet.

              

Newsgroups: rec.aquaria,alt.aquaria
From: fvr@broom.bae.bellcore.com (Frank Ricciardi)
Subject:  Nitrate problem resolved!
Organization: Bell Communications Research
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 14:53:05 GMT

     First of all, thanks to all of you who responded to my previous posting
regarding Anemone question #99, you've been a great help.

        My Nitrate level has come down from 80 PPM to about 20 PPM. My question
is dare I try to keep another anemone? Some of you suggested that my lighting
(single tube fluorescent Triton bulb) might be inadequate. Also suggested was
that the nitrate was the primary problem.

        Is it prudent to attempt another anemone now, or should I blow about
a hundred bills on a double tube light & glass hood?




-- 
________________________________________________________________________________
"If you got to it and didn't do it, may you never get to it, and do it again"


Frank V. Ricciardi

fvr@bae.bellcore.com
From: oleg@Veritas.COM (Oleg Kiselev)
Newsgroups: rec.aquaria
Subject: Re: Mixing Egg Layers and Live Bearers
Date: 22 Aug 92 00:35:35 GMT
Reply-To: oleg@veritas.com (Oleg Kiselev)
Organization: Palo Alto Killifish Loft
X-Disclaimer: I speak for myself only unless explicitly indicated otherwise

cliff@watson.ibm.com (cliff) writes:
>Is there any problem with mixing egg layers and live bearers in
>freshwater tropical fish tanks?  Do the fish do just fine	
>together?

There is no problem mixing them as long as you keep the following things
in mind:
	egg-layers will eat livebearers' fry

	livebearers will eat the egg-layer's eggs

	livebearers are generally much higher metabolism fish than egg-layers
	and require more filtration

	livebearers will often out-compete egg-layers in getting the food


-- 
"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and 
child." -- Dan Quayle
 
Oleg Kiselev                                             oleg@veritas.com
Newsgroups: rec.aquaria,alt.aquaria
From: katie@fraser.sfu.ca (Katie Yu)
Subject: [F] Angelfish Question
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 04:56:49 GMT

I currently have an angelfish that is about one and a half inch long. It is
in a 33 gal with some neon tetras and albino cory cats. I want to get a few
more angelfish, but the one's that the pet shop has are only about half an 
inch long. I want to know if the bigger angelfish will start bothering the
smaller ones if they are placed on the same tank?

thanks in advance
Newsgroups: rec.aquaria
From: faith@wam.umd.edu (Jerome V. Smith)
Subject: Re: Elephantnose fish
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 15:57:31 GMT

In article <1992Aug11.174205.12779@watson.ibm.com> cliff@watson.ibm.com (C.Pickover;083801) writes:
>Are elephantnose fish hard to maintain (freshwater)?

No,  not really. I have one and he is doing just fine. They are a blind fish
but they do have radar. they know when they are surrounded.  Therefore it
appears that they like the dark.... not true.  you can put a glass tube in there
and they will be just fine.  They are like black ghost knifes and baby whales.
They will only eat worms (or maybe any other live food), but not flakes.

Good luck!

Newsgroups: rec.aquaria
From: middleto@poincare.ucsd.edu (Tom Middleton ; System Manager)
Newsgroups: rec.nude
Subject: Re: Uptightness about sex & naked bods
Date: 14 Aug 92 22:32:46 GMT
Organization: Institute for NonLinear Science, UCSD
NNTP-Posting-Host: poincare.ucsd.edu

In article <> kurt@eskimo.celestial.com (Kurt Cockrum) writes:
>	To your collective credit, you all let me come around and dance in
>your fountain, and splash around a bit, without some net.cops coming around,
>net.macing me, and dragging me off in net.chains to net.jail :) ...sort of

You mean we forgot to abuse you for speaking your piece?  Oh man, I guess
we've just been on vacation.  I thought someone would kick you out of our
fountain for sure.  :-)


Actually, the one thing your posts and many others related to it bring up
as obvious is that sharing a common open attitude towards nudity does not
mean we share our attitudes about sex.  The mere fact that the discussion
existed (and sometimes got hot) emphasizes the !(nudity==sex) position.
[That is .NOT. ( NUDITY .EQ. SEX ) for you fortran hackers.]
[It is not ( nudity = sex ) for you pascal folks.]

-- 
Thomas Earl Middleton		| Camping Bares:  "An Anarchist Disorganization
aka Happy Bare			| Dedicated to the Destruction of the Fabric of
middleto@poincare.ucsd.edu	| Our Society"
From: frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca (Steve Frampton)
Newsgroups: rec.nude
Subject: Re: x rated gifs
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 92 22:47:49 EDT
Reply-To: frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca
Followup-To: rec.nude
Distribution: world
Organization: Vicuna Systems, Kingston, ON (613) 547-5066

skcgoh@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Shaw Goh) writes:
> Where can I find x-rated gifs.  Anonymous ftp site needed.

Beware of geeks bearing GIF's!  :-)

----------------------------------------------------
frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca (Steve Frampton)
Vicuna Systems BBS - 613/547-5066 [9600 v.32/.42bis]
Newsgroups: rec.nude
Subject: Re: Exercise
From: dsolis@koko.csustan.edu (Djelrik Solis)
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 92 10:55:20 GMT
Organization: CSU Stanislaus

In article <1992Aug14.163546.4811@leela.cs.orst.edu> megs@atlantis.CS.ORST.EDU (Meg Sisson) writes:

>                                                        Does jogging 
>really require support (both male/female) or is the clothing industry 
>just trying to sell more apparel?

	No, for casual jogging (which I dearly *hate*) I am quite comfortable
in the nude.  Even running on the beach is comfortable (very).

_____________________________________________________________________________
Djelrik Solis
CIIS, San Francisco

fishheads, fishheads, roley poley fishheads
fishheads, fishheads, eat them up, YUM!
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.nude
Subject: Re: BRA SURVEY
Date: 21 Aug 92 17:38:47 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <ritter.714317761@claude>, ritter@claude.ma30.bull.com (Roger Ritter) writes:
> The most amazing discovery for me, many years ago, was
> that it's possible to remove a bra without removing the shirts that
> cover it.  (See Crocodile Dundee II if you've never seen this in  
> person.)

Rent "Flashdance" if you want to see how it's done in Pittsburgh.

See?  I TOLD YOU this was an "important" survey!!!!

Terry
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry
From: Herberg_David@tandem.com (David Herberg)
Newsgroups: rec.nude
Subject: Re: Help locating CO places.
Date: 18 Aug 92 17:41:56 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Tandem Computers Inc.

In article <1992Aug17.195325.757@afs.com> Michael_Pizolato@afs.com 
(Michael Pizolato) writes:
> ObNude: Philadelphia TV station KYW (channel 3) did a report on Sandy 
> Hook a few weeks ago.  They presented it as the scandalous support by 
> our government of a  nude beach.  That is, they took the fact that there 
> happen to be no laws  prohibiting nudity on federal lands (forgive me
> if that's not quite correct - I know there are modifiers), and made it 
> sound like the government is actively promoting nudity (and implied sex) 
> against the wishes of decent, moral Americans.  It wasn't quite that 
> blatant, but there were a lot of sarcastic tones and smirks during the  
> report.  The video footage also showed everything, except that genitalia 
> and female breasts were smeared out with that sort of fuzzy electronic  
> floating rectangle effect that is used to hide threatened witnesses' 
> faces and such.  You could tell, however, that there was pubic hair 
> under there somewhere.  KYW is, as far as I know, last in the ratings of 
> the Philadelphia network affiliates, so maybe they're using titillation
> in a desperate attempt to gain viewers.  I've taken to calling their new 
> late news format "news lite."

I was at Sandy Hook when the Ch3 "reporters" came out.  A cameraman and a 
(male) interviewer type, both fully dressed, were walking around the beach 
trying to get female nudists to grant on-camera interviews.  
Simultaneously, the self-appointed "mayor" of the beach and some of his 
cohorts were following the pair around and verbally abusing them.  
Although I suspect that the reporting angle was already decided upon 
before the camera team arrived, the abuse they received in this ugly scene 
did nothing to help the nudist cause, either.  I took some photos of the 
exchange; I hope they come out.

As deplorable as the sensationalist "reporting" we get from the media is, 
folks like the "mayor" need to remember that Sandy Hook, and other places 
are *public*.  That's what makes them great.  But that also means that 
anyone can go there.  Although the mayor would like everyone to be nude, 
there is no law requiring nudity in public yet.  In fact, the reverse is 
the case, with tiny exceptions like Sandy Hook, which cling to their C/O 
status tenuously at best.  The cameraman has the legal right to film you 
there and put you on television or publish you in the paper 
_without_your_consent_ because it is a public place, just like he could do 
in the middle of Manhattan where everyone is dressed.  Although they 
grossly violated free beach *etiquette*, they are on much stronger *legal* 
ground than are the nudists.

That's the nasty part about the 1st Amendment, huh?  Although they can't 
stop you from saying what you want, you can't stop them from saying what 
they want, no matter how strongly you disagree with it.

David Herberg, Herberg_David@tandem.com
From: wejohnso@andromeda.rutgers.edu (Wes Johnson)
Newsgroups: rec.nude
Subject: Re: CO IN CAPE MAY
Date: 18 Aug 92 20:37:45 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

Bird.Man@f583.n107.z1.ieee.org (Bird Man) writes:

>I am planning a trip to the area of Cape May on 8/24. Can someone
>tell me the location of the CO beach. Thanks.
>--- GroupMail 2.18
 Fill me in too, please. Post it or email to wejohnso@andromeda.rutgers.edu
Newsgroups: rec.nude
From: bote@access.digex.com (John Boteler)
Subject: Re: Uptightness about sex & ...
Organization: Express Access Public Access UNIX, Greenbelt, Maryland USA
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 07:38:22 GMT

williamt@athena.Eng.sun.com (Dances with Drums) writes:
>	However, light rays are easily blocked/ignored.  I don't have to
>look -- I can look the other way, sleep, read a book, close my eyes,
>etc.  Unfortunately, I can't do that with my ears.

Yeah, I mean what happens when you finally hit the
exxtasy button and both let out a gigantic moan
heard around the world. Then we're back to the
stereo. Unless you turn it up real loud.

There's no end to the silliness!

-- 

bote@access.digex.com (John Boteler)

Newsgroups: rec.nude
From: middleto@poincare.ucsd.edu (Tom Middleton ; System Manager)
Newsgroups: rec.nude
Subject: Public Lands vs Public Eyes
Date: 14 Aug 92 23:03:17 GMT
Organization: Institute for NonLinear Science, UCSD
NNTP-Posting-Host: poincare.ucsd.edu

In article <> middleto@poincare.ucsd.edu (Tom Middleton) writes:
>                            I think it would help in this discussion if we
>all understood we are talking about public (as in owned by the public) lands
>and beaches are just a subset of that.

And another thing that some of you have confused me with, the difference
between something on public lands and the same thing in front of the publics
eyes.  I advocate nudity should be allowed on public lands and should be
o.k. in front of public eyes.  I advocate sex should be allowed on public
grounds but do NOT advocate sex in front of the publics eyes.  I'll fight
for and support the right to be nude in the publics eyes on public lands.

With regards to my attitude on sex, well, I will neither explain it nor
defend it here because this isn't the place for it.  I will say that I do
feel comfortable separating the two discussions and even though some of you
believe they should be tied together you haven't convinced me.  If I am a
prude simply because I won't support the battle for sex in front of the
publics eyes then so be it.

-- 
Thomas Earl Middleton		| Camping Bares:  "An Anarchist Disorganization
aka Happy Bare			| Dedicated to the Destruction of the Fabric of
middleto@poincare.ucsd.edu	| Our Society"
Newsgroups: rec.nude
From: roy@engin.umich.edu (Roy William Feague)
Subject: Re: Michigan CO
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 15:15:46 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Distribution: usa

In article <sirota#m#_alex-090892044355@90.20.3.216> sirota#m#_alex@msgate.corp.apple.com (Alex Sirota) writes:
>In article <f0ymxs=.feustel@netcom.com>, feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel)
>wrote:
>> 
>> My girlfriend while I was attending Michigan once went swimming nude
>> in the women's pool with a friend. Maybe the U should have clothing
>> optional hours at the pools.
>> -- 
>> Dave Feustel N9MYI <feustel@netcom.com>
>
>Which swimming pool is this Dave? The natatorium you mean? I am up for a
>nude outing at U of M. I will be in my senior year next year. Tried nude
>beaches here in the SF Bay and loved it...
>So what is the deal in Michigan? Anyone?
Wow! Some folks at U of M with CO interests.  I assume you guys do the
Nude Mile?  And Dave, which pool was that?  I've heard of some
people sneaking over the fence into Fuller Pool at night, but I've also
heard that they now have an alarm system, which can be mighty embarassing.
Maybe we can organize something ourselves... a poker night, something.
Might be interesting...
Roy Feague

Xref: sparky rec.nude:4023 alt.sex:27342 alt.sewing:2464 alt.tasteless:9246 alt.best.of.internet:74 alt.butt.harp:188
From: 9125113g@lux.latrobe.edu.au (Mitch Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.nude,alt.sex,alt.sewing,alt.tasteless,alt.best.of.internet,alt.butt.harp
Subject: Re: EXTENDED BRA SURVEY
Summary: My reply to request for data on putting on a bra
Keywords: Bizzare! BRA Breasts Mildly amusing
Date: 22 Aug 92 14:33:42 GMT
Organization: La Trobe University

In article <9837@ncrwat.Waterloo.NCR.COM> you write:

>	So far it seams the belt-and-twist method is more prevelent
>	for rear fastening bras, however, I am interested in knowing
>	if the ladies that use this method were taught this way from
>	day 1 or adopted it later because it was easier.

>	So guess what, I want to know the numbers.
>
>	So the new survey is as follows.
>

After very careful consideration, here are my answers.

>				never ----------- always	
>			          0  1  2  3  4  5  6
> 		----------------------------------------
>		1. Do you wear a bra                 [0]
>		2. Does it have rear fasteners       [0]
>		3. Does it have front fasteners      [0] 
>		4. If it is rear fastening do you
>		     fasten behind your back.        [0]
>		5. If it is rear fastening do you
>		     belt-and-twist                  [0]
>		6. If you belt-and-twist have you
>		     always done it that way         <?> Y or N
>		7. If you rear fasten have you
>		     tried belt and twist            <?> Y or N
>		8. If it is front fastening do you
>	             use one arm in, round back,
>	             other arm method.               [0]
>		9. If it is front loading do you
>		     use two arms in behind the
>		     back method.                    [0]
>	       10. If it is front loading do you
>		     use arms in in front, over
>		     head, down arms method.         [0] 
>		----------------------------------------

I hope you find this data useful.  Your survey did not specifically request 
that only females reply, so I thought you wouldn't mind if guys responded.

Now, if you were to post a survey on how guys prefer to take bras off,
I'm sure you'll get a LOT of interesting data.

I will resend my details to you, should I develop breasts before the end
of the survey period.

Yours,

Mitch.
Newsgroups: rec.nude
From: bote@access.digex.com (John Boteler)
Subject: Re: Uptightness about sex & naked bods
Organization: Express Access Public Access UNIX, Greenbelt, Maryland USA
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 07:32:30 GMT

kurt@eskimo.celestial.com (Kurt Cockring) writes:
>In article <1992Aug06.161246.29771@bmerh85.bnr.ca> glenm@bnr.ca writes:
>>Acutally, TNS appears to be trying to be both - nice people directly,
>>and not-so-nice people through their Naturist Action Commitee (NAC)
>>arm. Those guys do go out, get arrested, test legislation. And bitch
>>a lot.
>
>Great!!!  More power to them!

NAC needs money right now more than it needs power.

Please send both.

-- 

bote@access.digex.com (John Boteler)

Newsgroups: rec.nude
From: andy@nff.ncl.Omron.Co.Jp (Andy Krantz)
Subject: Re: Sex on the beach
Followup-To: rec.nude
Keywords: Smilies
Reply-To: andy@nff.ncl.omron.co.jp
Organization: Omron Computer Systems R&D Labs 
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 10:49:46 GMT

> In article <1992Aug17.195802.810@afs.com>, Michael_Pizolato@afs.com (Michael Pizolato) writes:
> > In article <4591@verdix.verdix.com> dharma@verdix.com (Manjeri Dharmarajan)  
> > writes:

> >     Someone's blah blah blah... and more blah blah blah.
>
> Somebody else's blah blah blah.

Darnit, when I looked at the title I thought, "Great, I am finally going to be
able to find out the ratios for 'sex on the beach'. Let's see it was supposed
to be some vodka, a bit of peach schnapps (my favourite) and orange juice.

Alas, I was sorely disappointed by the contents. It had a bitter taste, didn't
go down well and made me switch to something else.

OBNUDE: There is none. This was your comic relief break.

Now if I could only figure out where to get some good peach schnapps around
here.

-- 
 Andy Krantz   andy@nff.ncl.omron.co.jp   \ Everyone stares at me 'cause I is
 Phone: +81-75-951-5111 x3691 FAX: 956-7403\ gaijin. I understand nobody and 
 OMRON Corp., Computer Systems R&D Labs    / nobody understand me  How could
 Shimokaiinji, Nagaokakyo Kyoto, 617 Japan/   I possibly speak for company?
From: cms2839@ultb.isc.rit.edu (a.stranger)
Newsgroups: rec.nude
Subject: Re: Campus Naturist Network forming
Date: 20 Aug 92 22:01:39 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Minimalist Music for Hyperactive Children (MMHC)
Originator: cms2839@ultb


				i've been working to organize naturists
at rochester institute of technology ( rochester , ny ) and am
definately interested in linking up with other campus groups . i fully
support the idea of a " campus naturist network " ( CNN ? 8^)= ) and am
interested in hearing from others ...

-- 
       @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
       @     "Imagination keeps the shadows away  -  Xymox      @
       @~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@
       @       a.stranger  -  CMS2839@ritvax.isc.rit.edu        @
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Newsgroups: rec.nude
Subject: Re: Warning -- this is a flame
Date: 13 Aug 92 17:25:42 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Aug13.030729.25893@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, cc647@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark Cornick) writes:

> Why is it whenever I fire up rec.nude these days, all I see are articles
> about sex on the beach? If we're trying to make the point that this group
> isn't for sex discussion, this certainly isn't the way to do it.

Hey, what do you mean "we", paleface?  Come back in 2 weeks and things will
be back to normal.  We'll be discussing what to do if you get an erection at
the nude beach, just like before.

Terry "not REALLY a flame" Wood
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry
From: CNSE57@maccvm.corp.mot.com (Joe Yackee)
Subject: Re: 1992 Volleyball Competition
Organization: Motorola
Date: 17 Aug 1992 13:04:17 CDT

------------------------- Original Article -------------------------
From: dreblow@vax.muskingum.edu (Lewis M. Dreblow)
Newsgroups: rec.nude
Subject: 1992 Volleyball Competition
Date: 14 Aug 92 23:02:56 GMT
Organization: Muskingum College

Hi fellow Nudists,

Since someone posted something about the 1992 Gay gathering I thought
I would post and query readers about the 1992 Nude Volleyball competition
at White Thorn.  Any rec.nude readers planning on attending?

FYI, Its held every year the weekend after labor day, this year from
September 10 through September 13 at White Thorn in Western Pennsylvania.
Usually $20 gets you in the gate for the whole event.  I will gladly post
or reply to anyone interested in a name, address, or telephone number
for details.

Lewis Dreblow, DREBLOW@VAX.MUSKINGUM.EDU

[let.yourself.be.free]

Newsgroups: rec.nude