HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: haas@wam.umd.edu (The Future Mr. Graf)
Subject: Bitmaps
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 01:42:06 GMT

Ok, here they are...

FTP to the site INFO.UMD.EDU and get into the directory UPLOADS. There
are a bunch of X-WINDOWS bitmaps there.  I don't have the converter
to change them into GIFs at the moment, so if anyone else does, let
me know, or convert them for me and reupload them into the uploads 
directory.

If you have problems downloading them, let me know...

						Jeff

-- 
***********************************************************************
*                                                                     *
*  Jeffrey Haas         "You're Honey Child To A Swarm Of Bees
*  HAAS@WAM.UMD.EDU      Gonna Blow Right Through You Like A Breeze"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: upul@ee.umr.edu (Upul Gunawardana)
Subject: Re: Chris Evert's picks
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 23:51:42 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla

In article <1992Sep13.122643.16771@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung) writes:
>
>When Seles was winning the US Open yesterday, Evert said that
>she picked Seles from the beginning. Actually, in an US Open Preview
>program on CBS, Evert said Graf, then she switched to Seles
>the day before the US Open during NBC's Mazda coverage. However,
>the USA Today reported Evert predicted that either Martina
>or Capriati would win.
>

Well, whatever that is, during the Mazda coverage Chris Evert
did say that Seles and Edberg will win, and that is correct this time.

-Upul
From: rajagopa@charlie.ece.scarolina.edu (Sundararaman Rajagopal)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: This little piggie
Date: 10 Sep 1992 14:18:06 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


Yes,If I remember right I think the pig had Gatting written on it. I dont
remember anyother names but Gatting was there. Also, it was the series in
which England defeated the Australians for the ashes and went on to win
the World Series One day cricket for the first time.It was also the first
time that WestIndies didnt win the competition. Infact they didnt make it to
the finals even.

Rajagopal.S.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: ede978e@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Robert D. Nicholson)
Subject: Re: speed of a serve
Organization: Monash University, Caulfield Campus
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 05:54:43 GMT

haas@wam.umd.edu (The Future Mr. Graf) writes:

>I have had press passes to a number of tennis tournaments in the last
>4 years, and the majority of the pros feel that the radar gun is VERY
>inaccurate.  Derrick Restagno says that the guns are rarely even in 
>the ballpark, and while I can't stand Derrick, I would have to agree.
>There have been too many instances where you know the serve was faster
>than was displayed.  Unfortunatly, speed has become the "thing".   I
>feel that placement is much more important.  Besides, aces are boring...

I liken that last sentence to a bowler in cricket.

Take Sir Richard Hadlee, the leading wicket taker in the world.  Hes by 
no means the fastest bowler ever however he can do anything with the
ball "Controlling the ball" is the most important part of a serve.  Sure
if you can consistently "Control the ball" aswell as hit it hard then
thats better.  But a high percentage of first serves is what serving
is all about.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Re: Give A. Sanchez credit
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 12:48:37 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.121153.18647@cs.brown.edu> PH412000@brownvm.brown.edu writes:
>I am not a Sanchez fan but I found it amazing that people won't give
>her any credit for her win over Graf. Yes, Graf made a lot of errors
>but if you were Sanchez and when you saw Graf was off, what would you do?
>Keep the ball in play or compete for errors? Hitting hard is nice to
>watch but playing smart will win matches for you.

Arantxa Sanchez Vicario is still essentially a defensive player.
Her main improvement from a few years ago is a much better
net game and it showed yesterday. After watching the match
in person, I watched the tape again at home last night. With
the benefit of replays and close up shots, I agree that Sanchez
played quite well yesterday. IMHO, she is not particularly
talented but has great foot speed and now with good hands
at the net. However, the only way she can beat Graf remains
retrieving a lot of balls and letting Graf commit unforced
errors. Steffi Graf played quite poorly yesterday and her
49 unforced errors is the main reason why she lost. For example,
in the first set tie break, she made three forehand errors,
three backhand errors and one double fault.
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     HR 1A-304, AT&T Bell Labs, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ, 07748 USA
From: guillory@crhc.uiuc.edu (Stanford Guillory)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Give A. Sanchez credit
Date: 12 Sep 1992 22:15:32 -0500
Organization: Center for Reliable and High-Performance Computing, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
NNTP-Posting-Host: bach.crhc.uiuc.edu

faa@athena.cs.wayne.edu (Felicitas A. Atabong) writes:
>yourself when you're having a lucky break? I could also say Graf beat
>Seles at Wimbledon because she was having a better day.


Thank you!! Yep, no one seemed to think that Graf's Wimbledon
victory was more due to a really bad day by Seles. And I think
they severely underated the effect of Seles' attempt to stop
grunting. I proudly announce that Seles ended that charade
today and LOUDLY trounced Sanchez for her 2nd straight US open
title. If Graf only had the guts of Seles, maybe she'd be 
somebody.

Stan
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: What happened to Agassi/Courier Match?
Date: 11 Sep 92 18:45:11 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

The title says it all

S.H

Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: cmgrawbu@eos.ncsu.edu (CHRISTOPHER M GRAWBURG)
Subject: Re: McEnroe fans!
Originator: cmgrawbu@c00562-1403br.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: cmgrawbu@eos.ncsu.edu (CHRISTOPHER M GRAWBURG)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 16:07:55 GMT




Yeah me too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mac is the Man!!!!

Any info. on the subject--- please pass on!!!


Chris---


***There is but one champion---he is Mac***
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: mpartha@pdx111 (Madhavan Parthasarathy)
Subject: Re: US Open Final
Organization: Intel Corp., Hillsboro, Oregon
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 19:13:22 GMT

In article <95943@bu.edu> robrod@csa.bu.edu (Roberto Rodriguez) writes:
>
>I think people have down-played Sampras's ill-condition entering the
>final.  He started having trouble since his match with Courier. 
>
>  ... etc ... etc
>
>Sampras must have done his best to come out and give a good
>performance.  He was able to mantain a good condition in the first set,
>but in the second his condition started to act up.  By the third it was
>clear that he wasn't moving well and not being able to chase down balls.
>In the forth, if a ball wasn't hit directly at him, he couldn't hit it.
>
>I think that if Sampras had not gotten sick he would have ended it in
>three sets just like in '90.  I would expect something like 6-3, 6-3, 6-2.
>

   I think you have over played (and over dramaticized) Sampras's condition.
 He was moving quite normally in the first three sets.  It was Edberg's
 attacking play and constant pressure that won him 2 of those sets.
 Even in the fourth, it was more than just Sampras's injury.  He looked
 mentally discouraged after failing to capitalize on his break in
 the third set.

   Give credit where it is due.  Sampras didn't play his best, but
 then neither did Edberg.  He was just tougher mentally.  Would have
 been fun though to watch the Sampras of '90 play the Edberg of '91.

 -Madhavan
-- 

Madhavan Parthasarathy

mpartha@ichips.intel.com  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: GE.TEG@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tito E. Gervacio)
Subject: Rain Delay on Edberg/Lendl 7: 41 p.m. PDT
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 02:41:31 GMT





   Score after seeing few blank lines:



















      Update on Edberg vs. Lendl
      Thursday, 9/10/92
      7:41 p.m. PDT



      Rain Delay on Edberg vs. Lendl, with score
         6-3 6-3 3-6 5-6 in favor of Edberg
From: ponamgi@cs.unc.edu (Madhav Ponamgi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: US Open Observations
Date: 15 Sep 92 03:14:22 GMT



Is it true Arthur Ashe had another heart attack recently?


This was a terrific US Open.  I went and saw several of the
matches in New York City.  Talent-wise I must confess that 
Boris Becker and Pete Sampras are simply amazing.  If they
ever get their respective acts together, they can be simply
overpowering.  I'm a big Ivan Lendl fan, but I have much more
respect for Sampras and Becker after seeing them up close and
personal.

As an added note, Michael Stich's serve is  gorgeous to watch in
action.  He's got to have the smoothest/efficient serve on the 
tour.  For such a frail looking man, he generates a hell-of-a-lot
of power.

Also, why don't the let-callers wear helmets?  Twice I saw them
being nailed on the head by a Becker shot.  It seems to be a very
dangerous location.

Madhav Ponamgi
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: clc5q@hemlock.cs.Virginia.EDU (Clark L. Coleman)
Subject: Re: Lendl, Connors, etc
Organization: University of Virginia Computer Science Department
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 14:28:47 GMT

In article <JPT.92Sep9171318@telecaster.think.com> jpt@telecaster.think.com (James P. Taylor) writes:
>In article <1992Sep9.181017.22464@walter.bellcore.com> donna@bae.bellcore.com (Donna Feliciano) writes:
>   ...........  Lendl seemed extraordinarily fresh.  I'm glad Lendl
>   won, not because I don't like Becker, because of everything else.
>
>Err?  You don't like Becker, because of *everything else*.  Please explain.

Perhaps you should have another try at parsing that sentence.

She didn't say she doesn't like Becker. Just the opposite.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It is seldom that any liberty is lost all at once." David Hume
|||  clc5q@virginia.edu (Clark L. Coleman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung)
Subject: Re: Chris Evert's picks
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 06:03:00 GMT

In article <1992Sep13.235142.10159@umr.edu> upul@ee.umr.edu (Upul Gunawardana) writes:
>In article <1992Sep13.122643.16771@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> shun@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (shun.cheung) writes:
>>
>>When Seles was winning the US Open yesterday, Evert said that
>>she picked Seles from the beginning. Actually, in an US Open Preview
>>program on CBS, Evert said Graf, then she switched to Seles
>>the day before the US Open during NBC's Mazda coverage. However,
>>the USA Today reported Evert predicted that either Martina
>>or Capriati would win.
>
>Well, whatever that is, during the Mazda coverage Chris Evert
>did say that Seles and Edberg will win, and that is correct this time.

My point is that Evert *appears* to be very concerned about
making the wrong picks and ended up picking at least four
different people to win the women's title. She'd better be
right in one of the picks. :-)
-- 
-- Shun Cheung,    electronic: shun.cheung@att.com    voice: (908) 615-5135
     HR 1A-304, AT&T Bell Labs, 480 Red Hill Road, Middletown, NJ, 07748 USA
From: ko@teecs.UUCP (Sam Ko)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 12:29:24 GMT
Subject: Re: Lendl/Becker head-to-head
Organization: Litton Systems, Toronto ONT
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis

Lendl (9) def. Becker (7) in 5 sets :

6-7(4-7) , 6-2 , 6-7(4-7) , 6-3 , 6-4
From: gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: US Open SPOILERS: full results up to Sunday night
Date: 9 Sep 92 15:23:47 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <BuA58M.75A@apollo.hp.com>, johnf@apollo.hp.com (John Francis) writes
:
>I am missing information for:
>
>    M2-17:Emilio Sanchez            Chris Pridham
7-6(7-3),6-7(5-7),6-2,6-4
>
>    W1-53:Catherine Mothes          Rachel McQuillan          *
6-2,6-0
>
-- 

        ***********************
        *   Gail A. Fullman   *
        *   Manager - ADMO    *
        *   Ext. 83113        *
        ***********************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: ssubrama@dante.nmsu.edu (SUBRAMANIAM)
Subject: What happened to Edberg/Lendl match?
Organization: New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 23:58:23 GMT

The subject says it all.  What happened to this rain delayed match?

Siva
From: gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: WTA Women's Ranking: September 13th
Date: 16 Sep 92 01:25:30 GMT

The WTA top 50 ranked singles players
      (Through September 13th):
 1. Monica Seles, Yugoslavia, 275.2882
 2. Steffi Graf, Germany, 242.6071
 3. Gabriela Sabatini, Argentina, 189.2500
 4. Martina Navratilova, United States, 172.3077
 5. Arantxa Sanchez, Spain, 169.0275
 6. Mary Joe Fernandez, United States, 113.1156
 7. Jennifer Capriati, United States, 110.6528
 8. Conchita Martinez, Spain, 94.0966
 9. Manuela Maleeva, Switzerland, 87.6417
10. Anke Huber, Germany, 83.0833

11. Jana Novotna, Czechoslovakia, 70.4283
12. Nathalie Tauziat, France, 68.2950
13. Helena Sukova, Czechoslovakia, 63.4147
14. Zina Garrison, United States, 61.2106
15. Katerina Maleeva, Bulgaria, 59.9114
16. Mary Pierce, France, 59.2500
17. Amanda Coetzer, South Africa, 57.5000
18. Amy Frazier, United States, 55.9650
19. Sabine Appelmans, Belgium, 54.6278
20. Lori McNeil, United States, 53.5510
 
21. Leila Meskhi, Georgia, 52.8200
22. Magdalena Maleeva, Bulgaria, 50.9357
23. Julie Halard, France, 47.3577
24. Judith Wiesner, Austria, 45.8889
25. Kimiko Date, Japan, 45.8214
26. Barbara Rittner, Germany, 42.5294
27. Natalia Zvereva, Belarus, 41.4167
28. Naoko Sawamatsu, Japan, 39.0000
29. Radka Zrubakova, Czechoslovakia, 37.7739
30. Brenda Schultz, Netherlands, 36.3333

31. Patricia Hy, Canada, 35.8000
32. Laura Gildemeister, Peru, 32.8667
33. Sabine Hack, Germany, 32.4118
34. Gigi Fernandez, United States, 30.4105
35. Pam Shriver, United States, 30.0278
36. Natalia Medvedeva, Ukraine, 29.3947
37. Andrea Strnadova, Czechoslovakia, 28.0550
38. Manon Bollegraf, Netherlands, 27.4167
39. Ann Grossman, United States, 26.8625
40. Ines Gorrochategui, Argentina, 26.3750

41. Karina Habsudova, Czechoslovakia, 26.3000
42. Nicole Provis, Australia, 26.2900
43. Larissa Savchenko, Latvia, 25.6059
44. Rachel McQuillan, Australia, 25.0176
45. Jo Durie, Britain, 24.0533
46. Robin White, United States, 23.9615
47. Emanuela Zardo, Switzerland, 23.7143
48. Ros Fairbank, United States, 23.6389
49. Yayuk Basuki, Indonesia, 22.8500
50. Linda Harvey-Wild, United States, 22.6739
 

==================
WTA RANKING METHOD
==================

Players are awarded round points for each round they win plus 
bonus points for each win over a player ranked in the Virginia Slims
Top 500. Total points (round + bonus) are divided by the number of
tournaments played (minimum divisor of 12) to arrive at an average.
Points stay valid for 52 weeks from the date of the tournament.
Players must have at least 3 tournament appearances to appear in the
rankings.

GeSS
--
Gess Shankar      |<><>|Internet: gess@knex.Gwinnett.COM                |<><>|
Knowledge Exchange|<><>|{rutgers,ogicse,gatech}!emory!gwinnett!knex!gess|<><>|
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: mou@nova1.stanford.edu (Alex Mou)
Subject: Grand Slam Cup
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 19:22:36 GMT

Now four GS's are finished. It is time to determine those who are
qualified for the GS cup. Anybody can provide the list?
From: guillory@crhc.uiuc.edu (Stanford Guillory)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Lendl, Connors, etc
Date: 12 Sep 1992 21:34:19 -0500
Organization: Center for Reliable and High-Performance Computing, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
NNTP-Posting-Host: bach.crhc.uiuc.edu

donna@attic.bae.bellcore.com (Donna Feliciano) writes:
>Carillo said, "Lendl has been dissed by everyone this week", meaning
>after the Connors match, Connors was saying that Lendl is not the
>player he used to be and that he just bunts the ball back now.  Like
>I said later in the mail, Connors would not say "he beat me".
>Then Chuck Adams, who played Lendl in the next round, starting
>saying the same stuff, that Lendl obviously was not the player
>he used to be... etc.  I was happy for Lendl to play Becker

A reporter asked Lendl, after the Becker match, how he
thought Becker played. Lendl replied, tongue in cheek of
course, "He is not the player he used to be. He was just
bunting the ball back."

>"bunting" the ball back.  I felt bad for Becker, because I do
>like him.  After his early successes, he seems to be one of the
>few somewhat well adjusted tennis players that tries to have
>a life outside of tennis.

I think that may be Becker's problem. He seems to be
overly sensitive about the fact that he is not a high
school graduate, and wants to appear to others as
an intellectual. When asked about winning a medal for his
country at the olympics, he replied, " I am not going there
to play for my country, but to drink coffee with the
other athletes." !!!



>As I said above, in the post-match interview, Connors was saying
>"Lendl just bunted the ball back (implying Lendl can't/doesn't
>hit with pace anymore) and that everyone knows he is not the
>player he used to be".  He also had that smug look on his face 

The only difference I see in Lendl I see is his ranking (as
well as the lack of a grand slam title recently). Could it
be that his decision to skip the French Open to prepare
for Wimbledon has damaged his ranking in an artificial way?
He can obviously play head to head against the best.
>Donna V. Feliciano                 email: donna@bae.bellcore.com

Stan

Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles Lin)
Subject: Re: Carillo
Reply-To: clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles C. Lin)
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity of Uniland, College Park
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 01:21:24 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.203013.9600@news2.cis.umn.edu>, bose@femto.cs.umn.edu (Ashim Bose) writes:
> In article <1992Sep14.193117.14655@src.umd.edu> clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles C. Lin) writes:
> >
> >   It's not really a complaint, but I do find Mary's choice of
> >words bizarre.  For example, she likes saying that the players
> >are hitting the ball crisply, or that one person is hitting
> >a cleaner ball than the other.
> 
> What's wrong with her choice of words here?  Just because she doen't use the
> same tired phrases that our ears have been so accustomed to hearing does
> not, in my opinion, make her a prime candidate for lynching! [:-)]

   I did not say I opposed what she said, I only found it strange.

> 
> > She mentioned at one point that
> >Sampras was liquid (and Edberg, too) and Courier was solid and
> >liquid was beating solid.   A little strange, for my tastes.
> 
> She was referring to the grace and fluidity of the finalists' movements on
> court, compared to the athletic, high impact, motion of someone like Courier.
> I thought it was a rather astute observation, but then we all have different
> tastes ....

   I understood the reference.  I wonder if the observation is astute
or the analogy that is good.  For example, it might be a good observation
to note that when Edberg's head is not kept up during the service
motion, then he faults more often.  This is something that people
might not be able to catch.  Of course, why keeping the head up
is important is rarely explained.  People know remedies but not
often why it works.  Carillo, however, might be able to express
some idea we know in a more dramatic fashion, or unusual, at least.
Well, that's just a nitpick.

> 
> By the way, keep up the good work with the racket reviews.  I might base my
> next racket-demoing decision on what you wrote!
> 

   Too bad the weather is starting to cool down and I may not
be able to test as many racquets as before.  It's a good idea,
if you can do it, to test the racquets yourself.

--
Charles Lin
clin@eng.umd.edu
From: anil@quiver.enet.dec.com (agr)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
Subject: Re: Tuesday Results
Date: 9 Sep 92 15:38:17 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


    Nice to see the men's seeds live up to their reputation.
    Lendl was really into the game against Becker.. he won it with grit
    and determination.  This is also the first time I have seen him that
    pumped up!

    Chang is full of surprises.  Some of his gets against Washington,
    you had to see to believe.  Every now and then he would pull out
    a huge serve, for someone his size.  I still don't understand how
    he got to be seeded so high (4)?

    agr
    ------------------------
    anil@quiver.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: donna@bae.bellcore.com (Donna Feliciano)
Subject: Re: US Open Prize Money
Organization: Bellcore
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 14:25:47 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.021858.19076@src.umd.edu>, clin@eng.umd.edu (Charles Lin) writes:
|> In article <1992Sep15.001737.26047@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>, twromero@McRCIM.McGill.EDU (Michael Lin) writes:
|> > 
|> 
...stuff deleted ...

|>    I'm not sure why there's so much money in tennis (compared
|> to golf, for example), though the money is quite top-heavy.

You obviously have not looked at the prize money for golf!!!
At the end of the year, at least 100 players are making MAJOR
BUCKS!!!!!  I take golf over tennis for prize money anyday
(especially if doubles isn't included).


|> --
|> Charles Lin
|> clin@eng.umd.edu

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Donna V. Feliciano                 email: donna@bae.bellcore.com
Bellcore                           Phone: (908) 699-2161
444 Hoes Lane Room RRC 4A741       FAX:   (908) 336-2828
Piscataway, NJ 08854
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: wex@cs.ulowell.edu (Paul M. Wexelblat)
Subject: No Tie-breaker Tourny ??
Originator: wex@bigmax.ulowell.edu
Reply-To: wex@cs.ulowell.edu
Organization: Univ. of Lowell CS Dept.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 16:57:32 GMT


Would there be any real interest in an "Old Fashioned" Tennis
Tournament that used no tie-breakers (like before 1970).

Would TV cover it?
Would Players Attend?
Could modern players handle it?

Proposal is that one of the existing tour tourneys suggest this format
(Not one of the GS.)
-- 
You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.

	...Wex
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: hari@robios.me.wisc.edu (Kambainathan Hari)
Subject: Re: US Open - patch on players' shirts
Organization: U. Wisconsin-Madison, Robotics Laboratory
Date: 11 Sep 92 09:41:51
In-reply-to: sbmalloc@socs.uts.edu.au's message of 11 Sep 92 03:37:46 GMT


> I have noticed that about 80% of players at the US Open are wearing on their
> shirts a round yellow patch with a red symbol on it. Can anyone tell me what
> the patch is for and why so many of the players are wearing it?

I think the yellow patches are meant for the Authur Ashe AIDS
foundation. The players are trying to rope in about 5 million for the
foundation. 

- Hari

K.R.Harinarayan
Robotics Lab., Dept. of Mech. Engg.
Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison

Fone  : (608) 262-7463, (608) 262 - 9056
e-mail: hari@robios.me.wisc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis
From: symons@elec.uq.oz.au (Anthony Symons)
Subject: stich vs becker
Summary: what was the score
Keywords: stich dudout
Organization: Prentice Centre, University of Queensland
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 03:51:24 GMT


what was the 1991 Wimbledon final score -
Men's Singles ???????????