HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: Washington 31-7 win over ASU uninpressive
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 92 18:15:01 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <1992Sep6.170526.17202@u.washington.edu> yeonwook@hardy.u.washington.edu (Mark Choi) writes:

>As for other PAC-10 play...hats off to Cal, I can't wait for the
>California-Washington showdown at Husky Stadium, it should be very close
>this year because of Gilbertson at Cal (traitor! =).... Now that I look

I like your attitude, but there's one big, BIG reason that this game
might not be close -- the home-field advantage.  I'd love to see a
good game, but I'm expecting that the Huskiew will win by three TDs
unless Cal's defense has an absolutely monster day.
-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund)
Subject: Re: SWC preview for 9/12
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 15:48:06 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Keywords: yes, the SWC still exists...

In article <1992Sep9.203407.22585@chpc.utexas.edu> boisseau@chpc.utexas.edu (John R. Boisseau (Jay)) writes:
>
>--------------------------------------
>SWC Preview For Games the Week of 9/12
>--------------------------------------
>
>The SWC previews are being prepared by Gary 'Goober' Smith and Jay Boisseau
>from this week onward.
>
>  .... stuff deleted
>
>WESTERN MICHIGAN at TCU
>-----------------------
>TCU lost to New Mexico last week, which is consistently one of the
>most pitiful teams in Div. IA. We don't have anything bright to say on
>this one... but we don't think TCU will lose their home opener. They

Well as a displaced Washington Huskie fan I really cant be considered
a New Mexico Woofer ( if such a thing is even possible ;-) ) but let
me just say that TCU didnt lose to the Lobos...the Lobos BEAT TCU!
The Lobos controlled most of the game ( overcame a bad start) and
held on in the crunch.  Quite a departure from the old Lobos.  New
head coach Franccione (sp??) may be able to turn this team around.
Well, at least they wont go 0-11 this year! ;-)



-Eric Jaderlund
jade@triton.unm.edu
From: rlakin@eis.calstate.edu (Rick Lakin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Faulk, 299 yds rushing vs. BYU
Date: 15 Sep 92 23:06:27 GMT
Organization: Calif State Univ/Electronic Information Services

Faulk had 25 carries 114 yards and 2 TDs vs. Air Force in 1991.  I will
post his 1991 game by game stats if anyone is interested.
					Rick Lakin
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason Fawcett)
Subject: Re: no on UTexas to Big 10
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 21:25:32 GMT

ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:

>In article <JEFF.92Sep9224610@neuron.cs.tamu.edu> jeff@neuron.cs.tamu.edu (Jeff Goldberg) writes:

>   >I wasted most of a half hour trying to confirm or not the big rumor that
>   >U. Texas has decided or agreed to move to the Big 10 conference.  On
>   >channel 36 (Austin) sports, they covered the Syracuse game, no mention
>   >of any Big 10 situation.  The same lack of such news on Houston, College
>   >Station sports.  My conclusion is that although this is likely to happen
>   >sometime, it is apparently nothing more than a false report at this time.
> 
>I hope you're right.  The big 10, little 1 doesn't need another team
>right now.  They couldn't even play every team *before* P.S.U. joined.
>I don't see the Big 10 letting in another team unless they get rid of
>Northwestern.

Gullible adj.: Easily deceived, cheated or Duped.   Looks like the t.u. boys
pulled one over on tamu boys.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jade@triton.unm.edu (Eric Jaderlund)
Subject: Re: Nebraska WOOFings!!??
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 92 14:12:48 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Distribution: usa

In article <1992Sep8.183343.5667@mdd.comm.mot.com> behzad@mdd.comm.mot.com (Behzad Khamneian) writes:
>
>I have detected some WOOFings from Nebraska fans about how the BIG RED is gonna
>come to Seattle and just beat the Huskies!!  :)
>
>I gotta admit that the gaping holes that the defense allowed against ASU were
>not very pretty, but I also do believe that the defense will come together by
>6:30 pm come September 19th.
>
>Well, I'll leave it at that and let the teams do the talking on the field...
>

Well, I'll do more than that! ;-)

  Washington: 35    Nebraska: 13   (but it wont be that close)

Remember you heard it here first!

-Eric Jaderlund
jade@triton.unm.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: harper@pembvax1.pembroke.edu
Subject: NC State /Florida St. Prediction
Organization: Pembroke State University
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 21:43:05 GMT

Here's my perdiction for the NC State/Florida St. game

NC State 24 Florida St 10

I feel NC State's defense is better than Florida St's offense.
NC State will cause 2 turnovers and score on one.

And I am not a State fan. I am an ECU fan.

So, here's an ECU/South Carolina predictions too.

ECU 31 South Carolina 21 

ECU will come from behind in the third and hold on to win.
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 I speak for myself ONLY! Who in their right mind would let me speak for them?
 Eric Harper                         Internet: harper@pembvax1.pembroke.edu
 Pembroke State University           Bitnet:   harper@pembvax1.bitnet
 University Computing and         
 Information Services              
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: FSU at North Texas State
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 12:37:09 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.202925.9617@spss.com> nichols@spss.com (David Nichols) writes:
>The FSU win over North Texas State was in the late '70s or early '80s.
>

Why anyone cares is beyond me, BUT.....it was 1977, or possibly 1976. I know it
happened while I lived in Tallahassee. I remember watching a homecoming
parade; one of the floats had tombstones for teams that had already lost
to FSU, and NTSU was one of them... i was 7 at the time.....

r


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tsrail@dad.bgsu.edu (Tom Srail)
Subject: Re: Western Michigan?
Organization: Bowling Green State Univ.
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 22:01:18 GMT

In article <1992Sep4.201016.12807@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, dwest@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Dan West) writes:
|> In article <Bu2C0J.28I@acsu.buffalo.edu> v087jsfu@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (DANNY) writes:
|> >Anyone have any news on Thursday's game of Bowling Green State vs.
|> >Western Michigan?
|> 
|> I believe the final was 29-19 BG. BG now has a 11 game winning streak
|> going into the TOSU game. The streak will end.


I wouldn't be TOO certain of that, Dan.

I guess we'll see Saturday, huh?

Tom
From: kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com (Kevin Rodgers)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Colorado vs. Baylor (was: Re: (another) coaching move rumor)
Summary: It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.
Date: 8 Sep 92 18:29:21 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Buffalo Stampede

In article <lafr3lINNi1d@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> nolen@gandalf2.Eng.Sun.COM (Mark Nolen [TI]) writes:

>ps I realize my Bears will probably be crushed by CU this year, but just in case
>   they pull off a shocker like last year (how about that blocked field goal !?),
>   I'll remember those fuffaloe woofers out there.

After reading about Baylor's upset at the hands of Louisiana Tech, I was
ready to turn up my Woof-i-nator, but the Buffs are taking the Bears
very seriously.  They're mostly concerned about the heat at game time,
and Baylor's conservative offense against LaTech, which indicates they
didn't show much of what the Buffs will really face on Saturday.
Kick-off is noon in Waco, where the air temperature is expected to be
about 95 degrees and the field itself about 120.
-- 
Kevin Rodgers				kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com
Martin Marietta MS A16401		(303) 790-3971
116 Inverness Dr. East
Englewood CO 80112 USA			GO BUFFS!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Cal vs KU(was Re: Cal 14 v. Purdue 41)
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 08:32:54 CST
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


In article <randall.716513241@seashore>, randall@informix.com (Randall Rhea) writes:
>I hope the Bears learn their lesson.  I think they will.
>If we can get better play from the offensive line and QB, we
>should be able to beat Kansas.
>
Cal-woofers; are you still predicting a win at KU a week from
Thursday?   I think this should be a good game.  I think KU
will win, but will wait and see what happens to them in Tulsa
before I make any predictions.  
--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
From: ds4@soc13.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: TOP 10 TEAMS: WHO HAS THE EASIEST SCHEDULE?
Date: 6 Sep 92 21:38:40 GMT

Thanks for straightening me out.

-ds4
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: pdunn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick L Dunn)
Subject: Anybody have the Sports Network I-AA top 20?
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 16:47:03 GMT

I read in USA Today that The Sports Network puts out a weekly I-AA top 20.  
Does anybody out there have access to this, or know where I can get access to 
it?

Thanks

PDunn
From: krall@Think.COM (Tom Krall)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: line on Mn.-SJSU game
Date: 9 Sep 92 12:54:42 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: custard.think.com


Hi,

 Anyone out there have a line on the Minnesota vs. SJSU game ?
Does anyone out there give Minnesota *any* chance in the B10
this year ? Whats the word from Minneapolis these days....

Thanks
-Tom
-- 
=============================
Thomas F. Krall 
Product Support
Thinking Machines Corporation
=============================
From: andy@misha.central.sun.com (Andy Knipp Metro SE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Hmmm  Texas to Big 10!!!
Date: 10 Sep 92 11:20:25 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: andy@misha.central.sun.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: misha.central.sun.com

In article 23991@den.mmc.com, kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com (Kevin Rodgers) writes:
>I think Colorado's closest conference foes are Nebraska and Oklahoma,
>both (Lincoln and Norman) 12 hours away by car.

Uuuugghh.  I was thinking of driving from Chicago to Denver to ski this
year.  I guess not.  Lincoln must be a good 8-10 hours from here.  


---
Andy Knipp  SE                |
Sun Microsystems              | The secret of success is sincerity,
Schaumburg, IL                | once you can fake that,  you have it made.
andy@sunbird.central.sun.com  |

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Subject: Re: Wisconsin vs. Washington
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 23:08:32 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.182352.12129@mdd.comm.mot.com> behzad@mdd.comm.mot.com (Behzad Khamneian) writes:
>
>  Some final notes on the game.  Wisconsin played an awesome game.  The 
>stats indicate a blow-out, but Wisconsin didn't make any key mistakes and
>were still in the game until the fourth quarter.  Wisconsin probably has
>the biggest marching band I've ever seen.  No wonder it cost $100,000 to
>bring the band to Seattle.  I also liked the spunk of the Wisconsin fans.
>At the time (after the game) I found it annoying, but they were partying
>and acted like the owned the place  :)  

   I don't think you could give UW a better compliment! We may get our
   asses kicked on the field, but we can out-party any school! And our
   band is the best in the nation! When you say Wis-con-sin, you said
   it all!!

   --salty

>
>  I'd just like to give credit to Wisconsin players, fans, and their band :)
   
    Why thanks!

>Looking forward to the Nebraska game.  Let's see if the Nebraska fans are as
>spunky as the Wisconsin fans.
>
   I doubt it!!

>
>Behzad  
>"REAL DAWGS WEAR PURPLE"
>
>
>
>
>


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: bulls@cwis.unomaha.edu (Richie J. Anderson)
Subject: Re: UW HUSKIES WEEK-2 
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 17:47:20 GMT


  They are really going to struggle against the Huskers!!!!!!!!!!!
From: chill@walt.UUCP (Curtis Hill)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: ACC This Week: Predictions and Such
Date: 10 Sep 92 17:09:26 GMT




Responding to some of the ACC predictions and such for this week's
games.


FSU at Clemson
(subtitle:  neither of these two teams can live up to their hype this
year, but FSU's still better)

Unless Hatfield spent the summer at Bill Walsh's house, Clemson won't
be able to put enough points on the board to beat Florida State.
The only scenario that will save Clemson is to score or be put in 
excellent position to score via FSU mistakes.  I'm looking for a
bit of a blowout.   FSU 24  Clemson 13


NC State at Maryland

I think two touchdowns is too much.  Virginia's had NC State's number
over the last few years, but Maryland's been big trouble for the
Wolfpack, too.  NC State 24  Maryland 20


Furman at Carolina

Carolina can score points this year.  I don't believe they'll give up
2 touchdowns to the Purple Paladins.  Carolina 34  Furman 10





Curtis Hill
star3!walt!chill@mcnc.org
From: "al sorhaindo" <al.sorhaindo@execnet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: swc,rice, fake grass
Date: 5 Sep 92 13:35:33 EST
Reply-To: "al sorhaindo" <al.sorhaindo@execnet.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Executive Networks Information

Weird Stat of the Week:


Rice plays at Air Force September 5th. If the Owls win it will be their
first victory on grass since the seventies.


Every SWC team plays on that green painted concrete junk. 

(Not to mention the Cowboys, and Oilers. At least UTEP plays
 on natural turf.)

Doesn't grass grow in Texas? 
---
  DeLuxe 1.21 #11688  al.sorhaindo@execnet.com
--
Executive Network Information System  (914) 667-4567
International ILink Host
From: morse@satie.cs.unc.edu (Bryan Morse)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: lou holtz should be drawn and quartered
Date: 13 Sep 92 20:24:07 GMT
Organization: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

In article <JOHNDOE92Sep12.171012@asp.inmet> johndoe@asp.inmet (johndoe) writes:
>lou holtz sucks.  i have been a notre dame fan since i was six years old.
>lou holtz has managed to give me a reason to root against notre dame.
>
>you hear coaches tell their players to win.  lou holtz played not to lose.
>
>his excuse to the nbc reporter minutes ago was that he wanted to see what
>coverages michigan was going to be in.  bullshit.
>
>if he wanted to rush for a first down and see what the coverages were going
>to be, he should have been running pass-action-draws.  instead, he was
>running straight running plays out of a regular set backfield.  notre dame
>let the clock run for 15 seconds after the penalty.  he gave his players no
>chance to win the game.

This morning on the CNN Coaches Corner he did say that he was playing
so as not to have to punt the ball.  He also repeated what he said
previously about not passing the ball until he saw what type of coverage
Michigan would play.

As for what happened after the penalty, he did blame himself for that
and said that he forgot that under current rules (changed two years ago) 
the clock started back up after a penalty.  He thought it was stopped 
and went on talking to Mirer while it ran down.  

Okay, so I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that he wasn't
trying to be gutless.  Stupid?  Witless?  Senile?  Most definitely.

-- 
Bryan Morse                University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
morse@cs.unc.edu           Department of Computer Science
From: ds4@soc13.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: TOP 10 TEAMS: WHO HAS THE EASIEST SCHEDULE?
Date: 6 Sep 92 19:28:44 GMT

In article <67526@hydra.gatech.EDU>, mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:

|> F S U ?  As in Florida State University?  No, FSU should not even be
|> mentioned in the same room with the phrase "easy schedule".
|> 
|> Let's look at 6 measures selected by yours truly for e
|> They are:  A) # of returning bowl teams
|>            B) # of returning winning teams
|>            C) # of teams in this week's AP top 25
|>            D) sum of (26-ranking) for all ranked opponents
|>            E) # of top 10 opponents
|>            F) # of teams which went to a bowl in 1990 or 1991
|>            G) sum of all of the above values
|> 
|> So as you can see, by my measures Florida State has the *toughest*
|> schedule of any team in the top 10 by 5 of the 6 criteria and by
|> the overall score.  The easiest would appear to be Texas A&M, followed
|> by Alabama and Washington.  (However, note that Alabama and Florida
|> would be playing each other in the SEC championship if these ratings
|> held up, and thus would have increased degrees of difficulty.)

I do not know how you came up with criteria D.  I am not sure but it seems as
if you just added the total rankings of all the ranked opponents.  If this is
so, I must say, you do not know what the hell you are talking about.  Think about
this senerio: team 1 plays the number 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 teams and the rest
are unranked.  Now team 2 plays the 25th ranked team and the rest are unranked.
According to you, team 1 just gets a score of 15 and team 2 gets one of 25.
I'm sorry, but team 1 plays a much tougher schedule.

If that is not what you ment, can you please explain it.

 -ds4,

	The Duke Blue Devils, which has had the previlage to be the first ACC
team to be crushed in conference play against FSU.
From: ds4@soc1.acpub.duke.edu (DIMITRIS SIDIROPOULOS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Marsee Computer Rankings and Predictions for 9/12/92
Date: 14 Sep 92 18:05:10 GMT
Distribution: na

In article <BILLMS.92Sep14113437@z.eecs.umich.edu>, billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:

|> No, thats not at all what I'm saying.  I was saying that the guys who post
|> computer rankings provide a *service* to this newsgroup for free.  They are
|> not posting wild ramblings and ad hominem attacks.  And I've always thought
|> it was pretty childish to flame their rankings.  Discuss them, ask about the
|> algorithms, point out apparent errors (e.g. like ranking miami #13).  But
|> flaming them is pretty pathetic.
|> 
|> 
|> Bill

	Point taken Bill.....I will try to be more constructive next time.

~ds4
From: drxmann@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Dustin R. Christmann)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Hmmm  Texas to Big 10!!!
Keywords: n
Date: 13 Sep 92 18:50:14 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

In article <1992Sep10.182235.20518@news.eng.convex.com> dwray@convex.com (Daryl Wray) writes:
>Let's swap Tulsa for Missouri while we're at it.

NO!

Hoops, hoops, hoops!

Plus, their football team makes a pretty good doormat. (Had to work in some
football into this post.)
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanx,					| The remainder of this .signature has
Dustin R. Christmann			| been confiscated by the DEA and will
(drxmann@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu)		| be auctioned off by the government. 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: preddy@sam.ksu.ksu.edu (Prasanth Reddy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: START POOL
Date: 14 Sep 1992 12:28:57 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: sam.ksu.ksu.edu
Keywords: Someone organize a pool


I think one of us readers should try to organize a pool.  Kind of like the one
they have at rec.sports.pro.football.  It would be fun and frankly i think
college football games are much more exciting then pro games.  So if anyone wants
to help me organize a pool or has any other suggestions please e-mail me. Thanks.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: hajel@engin.umich.edu (john hajel)
Subject: Re: UMich-ND bickering (was Re: ND's DuBose Situation)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 08:50:01 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor

In article <BuCoxx.9nA@ais.org> ssj@ais.org (Stephen S. Johnston) writes:
>In article <9209081530.AA23575@dseg.ti.com> noonan@icd3 (Michael Noonan) writes:
> 
>>14-9 is a very nice record to have against a team, especially
>>if that team is Notre Dame.  However, it loses some of it's
>>importance (in current analysis) when you realize that 6 of
>>the last 7 were won by Notre Dame.  I don't know, but it
>>seemed to me that someone who's team had lost 6 of 7 shouldn't
>>be running around saying, "when will you 'finally start to
>>*win* some'."
> 

Please, try to get the facts before making a fool of yourself.
The series restarted in 1985:

Michigan Won: 1985, 1986, 1991
Notre Dame Won: 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990


JMH
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Virginia Tech
Date: 14 Sep 92 20:34:46 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1992Sep14.182304.8364@walter.bellcore.com> kevink@fugitive.soac.bellcore.com (Kevin Klinge) writes:
>In article <1992Sep14.133501.16630@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:

>
>|> Why?? Becuase when teams like tech have bad years--and tech has not been
>|> impressive so far, beating JMU, a nobody team who lost to Richmond this week-
>|> and now losing to EC-TC, then they really take it out on their big rivals.
>                     ^^^^^
>East Carolina Tennessee-Chatanooga perhaps?  Are you sure you know who VT
>played? :-)
>

EC-TC=East Carolina Teachers College, or what ECU was before they became a
University. FYI

r
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rowdy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (robert.dieckmann)
Subject: Re: Hmmm  Texas to Big 10!!!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:47:57 GMT
Keywords: n

In article <1992Sep10.194200.9983@hou.amoco.com> zcjm0f@wwnv42.uucp (CJohn Mace) writes:
> 
<deletions>
> I think the Big 8 and the SWC have been feeling out each other the 
> last few years...

Please, take it to alt.sex and return to foolball.college.

Bob (old, but never matured) Dieckmann

-- 
"Listen up son, and pay attention.   |  Bob Dieckmann (rwd@mtfme.att.com)
How ya' gonna learn anything if you  |  GO: Mets (& dear old Rutgers)
always got your head in a book?"     |  I probably should've included smileys.
                -- Foghorn Leghorn   |  **usual disclaimer**
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tbreeden@afit.af.mil (Thomas A. Breeden)
Subject: Re: Collingsworth
Organization: Air Force Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 13:34:45 GMT

In article <BuL1uC.FMx@news.larc.nasa.gov> ohmann@sab57.larc.nasa.gov (DDD) writes:
>If I'm not mistaken, he played for the Florida Gators back when
>they had their first streak of four losses to the 'Noles (late 70's).
>(Not during the Gators latest streak of four losses to the 'Noles (late 80's)).
>
>Sorry Gators, couldn't resist.
>
>=============================================
No problem from this Gator.  We won last year, and the 'Noles look
beatable this year.  (Problem is, so do 'da Gators.  Only time will

Besides, didn't we have a streak of seven before your latest streak
of four?  Does that mean we'll win six more?

Of course, "we" means 'da Gators.  I don't play, although they may
need some more help on the defensive front.
tell).

Andy



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college