HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: star trek vi: the und
Date: 11 Apr 92 13:34:58 EST
Reply-To: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Canada Remote Systems

JB>I looked in a recent issue of Variety yesterday and it was around
  >$72.5 million (for the North American market).  I think this figure is
  >a few weeks old, but at this point it's only taking in a couple of
  >hundred thousand a week (and dropping), so it's pretty close.  I'll
  >get the latest figure if there's interest (or just look in Variety at
  >your local newsstand).

How much did it cost to make the movie?  What did the other movies get?
I was just wondering if STVI made more than all others.
---
  OLX 2.1 TD  Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario/Detroit, MI
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch)
Subject: Re: 3 more reviews (JUSTICE ... HIDE & Q)
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 20:13:54 GMT

rawdon@cabrales.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon) writes:
>In <1992Apr15.154206.8369@cco.caltech.edu> tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch) writes:
>>kanamori@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Atsushi Kanamori) writes:

>It would be interesting to see, say, a TV mini series focusing on some
>of the crewmen on the ship, people who logically OUGHT to be the ones in
>danger most of the time.

Or at least a novel or two, since a miniseries doesn't seem a likely thing to
come into existence.  Suits me.

>>>HIDE AND Q
>>>----------

>>It's probably the weakest of the Q-centered stories beyond
>>"Qpid", but I don't understand the loathing many people have for it, 
>>honestly.  I thought it was rather mundane in bits, but not bad.

>Well, I can't really see a good thing about it.  If the premise (Riker gets
>"the power of the Q") is a good one, this episode sure didn't show it to me.
>Between Riker's posturing, 

Which bits?  Some of it was overdone, but some of it played up the character's
natural arrogance very well, I thought.

>the (entirely!) gratuitous violence, 

Agreed here.

>Yar crying,

A bit overacted, but not bad.

>and the "let's grant some officers their greatest wishes" scenes, 

Most of which I liked, thank you very much.

Tim Lynch
From: Terry Willingham (Terryw@clemson.clemson.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Sound effect CDs available?
Date: 16 Apr 92 16:52:32 GMT
Organization: Clemson University

tbrown@lehi3b15.csee.Lehigh.EDU (Thomas Brown [901015]) writes:

>I'm looking for information on obtaining Star Trek sound effects CDs such
>as those often found at conventions.  I would like both old sounds as well
>as STTNG sounds if available.

>Regards,
>-Tom

I have a sound effects CD from TOS.  Unfortunately, I got it at a used
CD store and don't know the original source.

I will be glad to mail info from the printed material on the CD to those
who might have an interest, but any addresses are likely to be way out
of date.

If anyone can help Tom out with some info, please mail a copy to me
also.  I would very much like to have some clear, clean versions of the
TNG sound effects.

Thanks,

Terry
Terryw@clemson.clemson.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Star Trek: A journey of the mind  ...  now that can be a trip!
From: hbj@phys.uucp (Harold B. Johnson )
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: What would YOU like to see a Galaxy class ship named?
Date: 9 Apr 92 04:32:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.1992Apr9.043235.11893
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Central Florida - Physics


How about the "Asimov"?
(Sorry if someone's already mentioned that)


Badcat
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: kanamori@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Atsushi Kanamori)
Subject: Re: Star Trek's Classics - Top 10 List (Not Letterman...)
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 19:21:07 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.083743.15909@acsu.buffalo.edu> v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey) writes:
>
>     Just to generate discussion, I've been kicking this list of
>     what I think are the best Star Trek TOS installments, in order
>     from absolute best downward.
>
>     1. _Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan_
>        The classic literary themes of obsession (_Moby Dick_), maturation
>        and tragedy (_Great Expectations_) are weaved through allegory
>        seamlessly into this brilliantly moving and dramatic and 
>        first transforms the TOS characters, Kirk especially, into
>        real people - without losing their archetypal heroes and
>        villains signatures.  Absolutely the best.  Nothing will
>        top it.

While I don't think it's "untoppable", I don't anything Trek-related
has topped it for me yet. 



>     2. "City on the Edge of Forever."
>        Harlan had nothing to bitch about.  The rewrites gave this
>        installment a surprising emotional weight and tragic 
>        demeanour.  Despite Shatner's horrible acting, par for the
>        course, his scenes with Joan Collins emote feeling and
>        you can't stop feeling Kirk's helplessness at the climax.
>        Best TOS episode ever.

I thought Shatner's acting was fine here. This episode is still one
of the most hard hitting Trek episodes I've seen.

>
>     The rest of the list later: included are, in no particular
>     order for the moment:
>
>         _Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country_

Urgh. Definitely not top 10 for me, not even top 20. Once the immediate
impact passed, I found it a supremely forgettable movie. The perestoika
allegory was a bad idea, IMO: it tried to score points with those who like
"Relevant" films but as far as I'm concerned, it's unimaginative
bandwagon jumping. Its treatment largely concerned itself with surface
allegory and largely missed the boat in treating the underlying themes.

On the whole, ST6 is a collection of nostalgic character bits combined
with straight action-adventure and a sophomoric whodunit. It was a
superficial story which made for a superficial movie and a poor way to end 
the TOS era. 


. .        .       .                .        
: : : :. : :  :....: : .  ::.: .  ..: :    ..     : :    .
::::::::::.: :::::::.:::::::::::.:::::: :?.:::::..::::.:.:
------------ -------------------------- --------------------------
TNG Lifelines: From "Yesterday's Enterprise" To "Cause & Effect" --
  "Captain, we are getting unusual readings 20,000 km off the
   starboard bow." -- Worf, Worf, Worf and Ensign Ro.
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Monday, 13 Apr 1992 12:24:12 CDT
From: Habeeb Jad Dihu <U53475@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: StarFleet Rules and Regs

Hi gang,

I REALLY would appreciate ANYONE who has or knows where I can get a copy of
StarFleet Rules and Regulations via eitehr FTP or email to send them to me
as soon as humanly possible.  ANY other Star Trek type documents that any of
you have would be appreciated as well.

Email to: u53475@uicvm.uic.edu

Thank you much

Habeeb Dihu
From: hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Matt Hucke)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Occurance of 18 in ST: TNG
Date: 14 Apr 92 20:43:40 GMT
Article-I.D.: ux1.1992Apr14.204340.15034
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

In article <1992Apr14.174001.4929@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jal41820@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Smiley) writes:
>:)            ^  I hate to bust you up on this one but in the episode where Troi
>:)>Data       2  takes command she has an honorary rank of Lt. Commander, thats
>:)>LaForge    2  3 pips making your total 19.

Her rank is real, not honorary.  She's not normally in the chain of command,
though, as she is probably classed as "medical".

>A) Lesse... Lt. Commander Data, 2 pips. I guess you're trying to say
>Troi is a sorta different Lt. Commander, then?

Data, Troi, and LaForge (season 3-5) all have 2.5 pips, two full and one
hollow.

>B) If this were the case, considering how long this has been up, don't you 
>think Tim, Atushi, Michael, Vidiot, Matt, and anyone else would have already
>jumped on it?  :)

I've been busy. :)


-- 
   And thither came Conan, a thief, a reaver, a slayer, to tread the jeweled 
   thrones of the Earth beneath his sandaled feet.  --THE NEMEDIAN CHRONICLES 
hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu                               Gene Roddenberry 1921-1991
From: Anthony_Battles_-T@cso.3mail.3com.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Troi nude gifs
Date: 13 Apr 92 15:43:00 GMT

Please dont flame me, But I am trying everything to open this.
could anyone give me the code to open this?

Thanks
Anthony
========================================================================
"What makes you think, you 
qualify for a Commanding
position?"..
"Give me the Galaxy and
I'll show you".         Graduation day at  Starfleet Academy.
========================================================================
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: markm@wri.com
Subject: seeking sound files
Reply-To: markm@wri.com
Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 13:56:37 GMT



Good day,

I'm looking for two sounds from our favorite show.

1.  The communicator chirp

2.  The 24th century "doorbell"

I'd really like to find these in either sparc .au or NeXT .snd format.

Thanks!

--Mark
markm@wri.com
From: 00ajpayne@bsu-ucs.uucp
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Mystery of Guinan revealed!!!!!
Date: 16 Apr 92 02:05:54 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.171708.1285@descartes.waterloo.edu>, pealbers@lagrange.waterloo.edu (Paul E. Albers) writes:
> In article <1992Apr8.221240.5922@bsu-ucs.uucp> 00jdbecktel@bsu-ucs.uucp writes:
>>> I just figured it out......
>>> 
>>> Guinan can sense all the little time problems right?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It is because she is a Time Lord.
>>> 
>>> Maybe Dr. Who's last regeneration.........
>>> 
>>> Can Time Lords switch sex during regenerations?????
>>> 
>>> -J
>>
>>What? Are you sure? I never thought about it?
>>Ya know, that would make a cool plot. Ya know what J...I wager your right.
>>Hmmm switching sex during regeneration. Would explain some things.
>>But Dr Who?
>>REally J,  don't you think you're stretching it?
>>
> 
> When Tom Baker announced that he was leaving Dr Who he said that he wished
> the next Docto luck, whoever he or she might be.  This has started off the
> unresolved debate over wheather a female Dr. is possible.
> 
> Paul
That would be the most awesome thing that could happen to Dr. Who.......

-J
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.fandom
From: tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch)
Subject: Richard Arnold's status (was Re: Yet Another Discussion...)
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.fandom
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 15:46:30 GMT

Followups set to r.a.s.fandom.

kuchar@buast7.bu.edu (Tom Kuchar) writes:
>In article <1992Apr12.231707.1777@gagme.chi.il.us> jasonl@gagme.chi.il.us (Jason Lindquist) writes:

>>1) I feel like an idiot for not reading the net and missing Richard Arnold's
>>dismissal.  Never do that again...

>Well Richard Arnold was at Creation's Boston convention this past
>weekend, and he seemed to be still a part of TNG. Doesn't look like
>his rumored dismissal is true.

It's hardly rumour, Tom.  It's very true; it's been documented by a host 
of people, some of them witnesses.  Richard was indeed fired in November
of last year, and to the best of my knowledge remains such.  He set a 
"deadline" in a letter to Paramount two months ago, claiming he would sue
for wrongful termination if not rehired.  As of two weeks ago, to the best of
my knowledge, the suit was still "pending".  

My current information suggests that RA is spending a great deal of time at
Creation cons these days because he now *works* for Creation Conventions.
His dismissal from Paramount is far from rumour.

>He did mention that Paramount is not thinking of doing a Sulu movie
>for STVII, especially since that the movie series will have continuity
>problems with the history that the TNG has established.  This seemed
							  -----------
>more like his opinion than a statement of fact.  
 ----------------------------------------------

But presented as fact.  Yep, that's Richard all right.  :-)

Tim Lynch (Cornell's first Astronomy B.A.; one of many Caltech grad students)
BITNET:  tlynch@citjuliet
INTERNET:  tlynch@juliet.caltech.edu
UUCP:  ...!ucbvax!tlynch%juliet.caltech.edu@hamlet.caltech.edu
R.I.P. Isaac Asimov, 1920-1992.  You will be missed.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek
From: floyd@micor.ocunix.on.ca (Etienne TassEh?)
Subject: Re: Communicator Pin Gets Job
Organization: M.B. Cormier INC., Orleans (Ont)
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 18:06:16 GMT

In article <1992Apr12.095755.23224@CS.ORST.EDU> petersm@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU (Marguerite Petersen) writes:
...
>think that there was no hope.  I started wearing my ST communicator
>pin on my suit every time I went on an interview.  I wore it mainly
>to remind myself to "go boldly forward etc."  Most people never
>noticed it and no-one commented on it.  Until the last interview
>I went on.  After the interview was over, the woman who had been
>interviewing me asked me about my pin.  I told her what it was and
>that I was indeed a Star Trek fan.  She then told me she and her
>boyfriend were also fans and had recently been to OMSI and had
>enjoyed it.
...
>I received a call from her two days later and was offered the job.
...

Let's hear it for the Brotherhood of Trekkers!
-- 
  /-------------------/--------------------------/----------------------/
 /  Etienne TassEh?  / Floyd@MiCor.OCUnix.ON.CA / "It's been surreal!" /
/-------------------/ Ottawa, Ontario  CANADA  /----------------------/
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: ottoh3@CFSMO.Honeywell.COM (Otto Heuer #3)
Subject: TREK RATE results (TAS)
To: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Posted-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 23: 01:26 cst
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 05:01:26 GMT
Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 00: 00:04 CDT

To send in votes, see accompanying posting with the subject line "TREK RATE".

This is the bi-monthly posting with a list of Star Trek in all flavors.
It contains the average rating for each episode, movie, book, etc. according
to the Usenet population.  It is useful for deciding which books to read (weed
out the one that NO one enjoyed), what episode of TNG people thought was the
best (or worst), etc.  RATE is the average rating on a scale of 0 to 1, NUM is
the number of votes in the database, and EPISODE NAME is (surprise) the
episode name with type (A=TAS B=book M=movie N=TNG O=TOS) in parenthesis.

0.284  11 BEM (A) 
0.349  12 INFINITE VULCAN, THE (A) 
0.389  11 HOW SHARPER THAN A SERPENT'S TOOTH (A) 
0.428  12 LORELEI SIGNAL, THE (A) 
0.435  10 PIRATES OF ORION, THE (A) 
0.450   9 BEYOND THE FARTHEST STAR (A) 
0.455  10 JIHAD (A) 
0.458  12 AMBERGRIS ELEMENT, THE (A) 
0.483  12 EYE OF THE BEHOLDER, THE (A) 
0.484  11 MAGICKS OF MEGAS-TU, THE (A) 
0.487   8 ALBATROS (A) 
0.500  11 TERRATIN INCIDENT, THE (A) 
0.501  11 PRACTICAL JOKER (A) 
0.506   9 SURVIVOR, THE (A) 
0.536  11 COUNTER CLOCK INCIDENT, THE (A) 
0.540  10 ONE OF OUR PLANETS IS MISSING (A) 
0.570  10 ONCE UPON A PLANET (A) 
0.571  12 MUDD'S PASSION (A) 
0.595  11 MORE TRIBBLES, MORE TROUBLES (A) 
0.665  12 TIME TRAP (A) 
0.700  13 SLAVER WEAPON (A) 
0.729  12 YESTERYEAR (A) 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: cthurrot@jade.tufts.edu (Zefram Cochrane)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,rec.arts.startrek.current,comp.sys.mac.hypercard
Subject: Re: Announcing the Star Trek-TNG Episode Guide stack
Keywords: get off this newsgroup
Date: 9 Apr 92 23:35:19 GMT
Followup-To: comp.windows.ms
Organization: Worcester Film Preservation Society

Stuff about Mac vs Windows deleted (and ignored)

Boys and girls, remember what group you are on.  Please move this discussion to 
the appropriate newsgroup (comp.windows.ms or something like that) and change
the subject line so that r.a.s.c people do not have to deal with this petty
brand-ism.  I mean, I'm a computer person too, but I discuss them in the appropriate
areas so that I do not impose on people who are simply not interested in the
topic.  Thank you for your consideration in advance, please flame via e-mail
(or preferrably to /dev/null)
-- 

VVVVVVV--Disclaimer--VVVVVVVVV		|	-Chris   (wonko@end.tufts.edu)
All opinions are mine, not those of     |	"On Vulcan, the teddy bears are
Tufts University 			|      	alive, and have six inch fangs"
(Like we'd agree on anything anyway)	|    -Spock to McCoy,"Journey to Babel"
From: jackies@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Jackie Sheddy)
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 12:18:21 GMT
Subject: Re: Original Star Trek Episode Name
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc

In rec.arts.startrek.misc, korman@seas.gwu.edu (John Korman) writes:

> I am trying to find the name of an original Star Trek episode.
> If anyone knows it, I would appreciate a reply.
> 
> The storyline is something like this:
> 
> Both the Klingons and the ship crew are stuck on the Enterprise. 
> There is this "entity"(?!) that feeds of the mutual hatred and 
> anger between the two groups and keeps getting more powerful. 
> This way it controls them; I think it  plays around with ship systems,
> weapons, etc. Eventually the crew realizes this and decides to make 
> peace with the Klingons. They all laugh, embrace each other  etc.  
> and the "entity" is destroyed and/or runs away.
> 
> Thanx,
> 
> John




	It's called "Day of the Dove".  From the third season.


Jackie
jackies@hpfcso.fc.hp.com
(no .sig, but thinking about it.)

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: rhudson@novell.com (Ron Hudson)
Subject: Re: Cause and Effect-the other Federation ship
Keywords: why didn't that captain question...
Organization: Novell Inc., San Jose, Califonia
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 20:48:06 GMT

The E-D looks a lot different than Kirks Enterprize. I think Kirk was mentioned
in TNG, in Encounter at Farpoint, during the first few moments of the show, 
Picard is walking into engineering and we are hearing his thoughts, he "thinks"
somthing about the "Legindary" Admiral Kirk getting in so much trouble, even 
with a vulcan first officer.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Hudson,        | Views expressed are my own, not anyone else's
Novell Sunnyvale   | I hear, I forget; I see, I remember; I do, I understand
Rhudson@Novell.com |

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: HADCDJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A)
Subject: Re: Star Trek's Classics - TOP 10 LIST
Organization: University of Houston Administrative Computing
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 16:34:16 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20

In <1992Apr14.234021.21650@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu writes:

> In article <92105.174327TAF102@psuvm.psu.edu> <TAF102@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> >
> >Actually...when STII:TWOK was released Leonard Nimoy did not plan to make
> >any more Star Trek movies.  Spock was REALLY suppose to be dead and stay
> >dead.  When Nimoy was convinced to come back and make STIII:TSFS, scenes
> >were added to the original version of STII:TWOK...or rather certain scenes
> >were altered.  Remember when McCoy tries to stop Spock...well, when STII
> >was released all Spock did was administer the nerve pinch to McCoy.  The
> >altered scene has Spock using the mind-touch to give his katra to McCoy
> >["REMEMBER..." Spock says] as he eases his unconscious friend to the floor.
> 
> Untrue.  While I do not remember my initial viewing of ST2 well (I was an
> 11-year old Star *Wars* fan at the time), I have magazine articles which 
> dicscuss these clues, including the "Remember", and speculating on how they
> would be used in the next movie.  These were printed well before ST3 was
> released.

  The "remember" quote was in TWOK in its initial theater release.  I was 17 and
remember it very well.

Jammer Jim
aka Captain Thevinen Salar, CO USS EXCALIBUR
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: janus@magnusson.uucp (Janus International Inc.)
Subject: Re: ST: TOS Pocket Books' Guide (ASCII version)
Organization: Salt Lake City NeXT Users Group
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 01:32:51 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.173050.17292@bnr.uk> agc@bnr.ca (Alan Carter) writes:
> In article <327@lionet.Wesley.OZ.AU>, ram@lionet.Wesley.OZ.AU (Richard A.  
Muirden) writes:

> |>         Lee Correy                         1

> Er... I seem to remember that James Blish wrote some of the early Star Trek
> books, but I don't see him listed here, unless he's lurking under a nom de
> plume, like Lee Correy (who I THINK is G. Harry Stine?) 

He _IS_ G. Harry Stine. I think Heinlein mentioned it in some book he wrote,  
I forget the one.

--Kris
-- 
__________________________________________________________________
Kris Magnusson                              "The Future is Roses."
kris@neb.uucp	     (NeXTmail)                     --Thomas Dolby
janus@magnusson.uucp (NeXTmail)                 "Windpower" (1982)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: twiggy@vaxb.acs.unt.edu
Subject: Re: Mann & Machine, Eve and Data
Organization: University of North Texas
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 15:42:42 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.123814.5565@umbc3.umbc.edu>, cs201139@batman.acslab.umbc.edu (cs201139) writes:
>>I watched Mann & machine last night... and I agree with a few people it does
>>seem to cash in on the TNG/Data Android theme.  Although one thing did biug
>>me... this android seem to put Data to shame (emotions, mannerisms), although
>>she (Eve, the androidette) did start using cliche's just like Data did; all
>>wrong and too many at a time.  She used ONE contraction.  A few "can nots".
>>I, being an ultimate Data fan (and even more so a Lore fan) felt that Eve made
>>Soong's work look like silly putty.  But then, these are two different shows
>>and I'm getting nitpicky because I have had no sleep this weekend and because
>>I feel that Soong androids are the only ones for me. (If I could find one :)
> 
> It would have been all to easy to make Data 100% human even in appearance, but
> you have to remember there are no real androids today and maybe not even in
> the 24th century. How can you put down Data just because another TV show
> comes up with a more 'HUMAN' android? I truely doubt we will have anything
> that complex this time soon. They are still trying to make a computer's
> brain as complex as a slug's and are having all sorts of problems. It will
> be quite some time before a computer can be as complex as a human and also
> be as small and compact.


The last thing that I, twiGGy Inaboo would ever dream of is to bash the most
honorable Lt. Commander Data.  I didn't mean it that way.  I was simply
comparing the two androids.   I MUST defend my Soongian friends.  But otherwise
you are correct, IMHO.

twiGGy


______
Captain twiGGy Inaboo of the USS Vanilla Bean
twiGGy@unt.edu
twiGGy@untvax.bitnet
twiGGy@av8r.uucp
twiGGy@daysrtom.edu
From: pip@pro-freedom.cts.com (David Pipgras)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Enterprise Shuttle named after TOS.
Date: 9 Apr 92 21:29:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: pro-free.1992Apr9.142935.115
Organization: ProLine [pro-freedom] AppleVan (Apple UG of Vancouver, WA)

>TMP improves with repeated viewings.

Yeah! Each time to view it, I seem to get even MORE sleep !! 8-)

Dave
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc