HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: spl@szechuan.ucsd.edu (Steve Lamont)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: The War Against Murphy Brown: (Warning: Satire on Murphy Brown)
Date: 30 Sep 1992 23:47:24 GMT
Organization: University of Calif., San Diego/Microscopy and Imaging Resource
NNTP-Posting-Host: szechuan.ucsd.edu

In article <1992Sep23.005859.27850@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>And in its place was the replay of Friday's Rush Limbaugh Show...
>hosted by none other than the King of Talk Radio, ...

You mean Larry King?

							spl
-- 
Steve Lamont, SciViGuy -- (619) 534-7968 -- spl@szechuan.ucsd.edu
UCSD Microscopy and Imaging Resource/UCSD Med School/La Jolla, CA 92093-0608
"If you don't think people are this crazy, you need to move to LA!"
                                     - Gary Stollman
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: dks@MIT.EDU (dks)
Subject: Would Dannikins have been "in the loop"?
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 12:47:10 EST
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA20779; Sun, 27 Sep 92 10:24:37 -0700
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA11507; Sun, 27 Sep 92 10:24:35 -0700
X-Received: from TMS-E19-PORT-5.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTPid AA13272; Sun, 27 Sep 92 13:24:22 EDT
X-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle.usenet
X-Cc: eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK)
X-Command: Send_AEvt(doAutoForward)


In article <5515@news.duke.edu>, eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK) writes:
> If Iran-Contra happened under a Bush-Quayle administration, how many of you
> would believe Quayle would be completely ignorant of what was going on?

Heh.  Does wily old George really trust Dannikins enough to keep
him . . . "in the loop"?  From what I've seen over the last three
years, I doubt it.  And even if George does trust Dannikins that
far, I doubt that his spooks do.  Besides, what on earth could
our beloved Vice Twerp possibly contribute to such an exercise,
other than his youthful charm and boyish enthusiasm?


Dhanesh
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Bumperstickers (Was: Mr. Casual Sex)
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 92 09:51:32 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann) writes:

> Back to the bumper stickers: earlier I mentioned having seen only one
> Bush/Quayle sticker in the Bay Area.  The interesting thing about the
> BQ design is that "Bush" is in white, on deep blue, but "92" and "Quayle"
> are in deep red, and very difficult to read against the blue.
> 
> Coincedence?

I've seen two Bush bumperstickers in the Bay Area. One was in support
of Bush/Quayle, the other said simply: BUllSHit.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge)
Subject: Re: Another Proof of the Utility of AffirmativeActionPlans
Organization: Paramax Systems Corporation, Paoli PA
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 17:38:48 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.165104.25575@u.washington.edu>,
sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) offers the following perceptive
observation on the employment prospects of the current vice-president:

|> 
|> Being Vice-Shrub is a form of WorkFare for DQ.  I'm not
|> sure what job this qualifies him for; but, hey, most
|> federal job-training programs have not been very successful.
|> 
|> 
|> -- 
|> | Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
|> 


  Well, this situation *could* be turned around, and thus provide a stunning
  success story in the use of targeted government programs that are designed 
  to get people out of public housing, off the public dole, and onto industry
  payrolls.  All that is required is finding the right job for Dan.

  There *is* a job that requires not a heck of a lot of intelligence, but does
  place a premium on a history of extensive contact with people from a variety 
  of walks-of-life.  This job also requires charm and a firm handshake.  Good 
  looks are also a plus.  Yes, there *is* one job for which Dan Quayle is 
  eminently qualified:

  Toner salesman for Xerox.  

--
 _________________________________________________________________________
|                                 |                                       |
| Herbert Rutledge, aka Train     |                                       |
| Paramax Systems Corporation     | "To post is human; to flame, divine." |
| Valley Forge Labs, M/S GVL-3    |                                       |
| P.O. Box 517, Paoli, PA  19301  |                     ---Alexander Pope |
| Internet: train@.gvl.unisys.com |                                       |
|_________________________________|_______________________________________|

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: Doonesbury (was Re: Marilyn's Indiscretions)
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 14:19:39 GMT

Edward J. Branley writes:

>pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh) writes:

>> Also, all kidding aside on the debates...I am worried about the expectation
>> game, i.e., if Dan can simply remember his own name, he may be seen as having
>> won because he did "better than expected".

>Oh, you know this is going to happen.  Poor Dano up against Al "I wrote a book
>and got it published and am an expert on the environment" Gore.  The biggest
>problem is that it's almost impossible to raise Our Boy's expectation level
>because we'd have to say something nice about him.  After last week's set of
>_Doonesbury_ strips, I'm not in a mood to contradict Mr. Trudeau <g>.

Yes, those strips were particularly nasty.  And I loved 'em!
(paraphrase) ->  "Let's see, what's on the next page...ALL RIGHT! A PICTURE!
...aw, nuts, it's a graph...."  "DANNY! GET TO WORK!"

(Was it you who asked yesterday why nobody had commented on these strips
 yet?  Sometimes it just takes a little while!)

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.george-bush
Subject: Re: Bush is Hoover (was: Re: A Simple Question)
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 92 09:47:55 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
Distribution: na
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu) writes:

> I am sure everyone's satisfied if he cut off trade, cut off relations
> with the Chinese regime, and impose sanctions.  But what do that achieve
> that in China?  If foreign trade was cut off, so will the rising star of
> private/joint venture business leaders and reformers in the government,
> communist is not going to be out of power if the economy is only fueled
> by stated owned factories.  The more you trade with China, the more
> China is open to the rest of the world, and the more free enterprising
> capitalism will grow, even in the ranks of communist cadres, and that
> is slowly but surely reforming china.

Well, aren't the Republicans claiming that they "won" the Cold War by
playing hardball and they didn't support Gorbachev economically because
it would have contributed to the continuation of Communism? And now
they're doing exactly the opposite in China, supporting the Communist
government in order to promote the growth of capitalism there?

It makes about as much sense too me as their American economic philosophy;
create incentive in the rich by giving them more money while creating
incentive in the poor by taking it away.

Everything this administration does has an ulterior purpose - to line
the pockets of themselves and their megarich supporters. They have no
guiding principles other than that. Any and all actions they take toward
this goal are explained to the American people by the most expedient
and sweetest sounding reason available, even if that reason conflicts
with some other apparent policy.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: Re: Frost and other interviews
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 14:12:36 GMT

John Viveiros writes:
   .
   .
   .
  (various examples of Dan responding to interviewer's questions with
   repeated canned answers that may or may not relate in any way to the
   question)
   .
   .
   .
>It seems obvious that Dan is being spoon fed lines, and will no
>longer be providing us with vintage Quaylisms.  The world mourns
>at the passing of Quayle-bashing.

I wouldn't worry about it.  Dan seems to slip in and out of this mode.
This reminds me of 1988, when Dan went through a period where he answered
every question by patting himself on the back for the Job Training and
Partnership Act, whether it had anything to do with the question or not.
I've always found it suspicious that I've never seen Dan photographed from
the back, and I think I may have the answer:  his handlers are afraid we'll
see the little nylon cord coming out the back of his neck with the little
plastic ring at the end (although I'd think it would be pretty easy to
airbrush that out of the picture).

The bigger danger is Election Day, when we may make Quayle-bashing obsolete
by removing him from the public eye.  But who knows -- like Nixon, or Jason
from the "Friday the 13th" movies, or other embarrassments from one's past,
he may just keep coming back!

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
From: dks@MIT.EDU (dks)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Royko article: Next Time, Dan, Take Aim At Arnold
Date: 27 Sep 92 19:11:48 GMT
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA24668; Sun, 27 Sep 92 11:14:41 -0700
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA13482; Sun, 27 Sep 92 11:14:39 -0700
X-Received: from TMS-E19-PORT-1.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTPid AA13546; Sun, 27 Sep 92 14:14:27 EDT
X-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle.usenet


bender@riscee.pko.dec.com (Patricia Bender) tells us that MIKE ROYKO writes:
> 
>       I'll be interested in hearing Quayle's response if, during his debate
> with Al Gore, he is asked: ``And, Mr. Vice President, how do you feel
> about Arnold Schwarzenegger, the chairman of your commander in chief's
> fitness program, playing the role of the offspring of a woman who was
> inseminated with the seed of nine men? Is that the kind of family value
> you would recommend to your fellow Hoosiers, hey?''  [...]
>       Anyway, if Quayle is going to wage war on Hollywood's warped view of
> family values, he should have a heart-to-heart talk with [Schwarzenegger].
>       Quayle might ask him: ``Nine fathers? Arnold, what kind of sport is
> that?''


Well, it's probably not golf, is it?


Dhanesh

  Please, no off-color jokes about the first nine at the U. S. Open.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.music.alternative
From: williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams)
Subject: Marilyn Quayle Parties Down with Sonic Youth
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 15:53:59 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

I went and saw Sonic Youth play in Davenport last night.  After opening
with "100%", Thurston Moore announced "We're staying at the same hotel
with Marilyn Quayle.  She's appearing at some banquet".  Then Lee Rinaldo
said "She's here for a SEX DATE."

They were highly amused by seeing her, though I'm not sure the feeling
was mutual.  They said their were three people standing out front with
signs, one of which said "Give them heck, Marilyn."
--
Kent Williams -- williams@cs.uiowa.edu Work(335-4496) Home(338-6053)
There used to be an inflammatory quote here.
From: jviv@usmi01.midland.chevron.com (John Viveiros)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Frost and other interviews
Date: 29 Sep 92 20:42:13 GMT
Distribution: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Organization: Chevron

Some more from the David Frost interview and CBS's "Reality
Check":

Frost:  I don't see much difference between your record and Gov.
Clinton's.  You both avoided going to Vietnam by using all legal
means.

Quayle:  I wore the uniform.  I'd just like to see Clinton "come
clean" about his draft record.

Frost:  We've heard that the HQ group of the National Guard was
reserved for special cases, rich people, etc.

Quayle:  The liberal media blah blah blah.  I'd just like to see
Clinton "come clean" about his draft record.

Frost:  Do you have any information telling you that Gov.
Clinton has in fact lied about his draft record.

Quayle:  I'd just like to see Clinton "come clean" about his
draft record.

Frost:  Gov. Clinton, in a previous interview said, "[rational
discourse omitted]".  What is not explained by that.

Quayle:  I'd just like to see Clinton "come clean" about his
draft record.

Gee, do you think Dan's handlers pulled the reins a little too
tight around our boys neck.  Must have cut off the flow of 
oxygen.

There was a similar 'Face the Nation' interview, where Quayle 
was asked, 'Do you support the plank in your platform calling
for a constitutional ban on abortions?'

Quayle:  We believe that a woman should...[irrelevant diatribe
omitted].

Interviewer:  What I'm asking you is a yes or no question, do
you support a constitutional amendment banning abortion?

Quayle:  We believe that a woman should...

Interviewer:  You're not going to answer my question, are you?

It seems obvious that Dan is being spoon fed lines, and will no
longer be providing us with vintage Quaylisms.  The world mourns
at the passing of Quayle-bashing.
-- 
John Viveiros     (jviv@chevron.com)
Chevron USA        Standard disclaimer applies
Midland TX
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Indiscretions
Keywords: Marilyn, screw, GHWB
Date: 1 Oct 92 15:15:15 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <1adgsgINN287@gap.caltech.edu> peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
>
>
>Do you actually believe that GHWB would rather sleep with Marilyn...
>than with Dan? 
>
>						--  M.

Maybe he never chooses.

Barbara ... Dan-o ... Marilyn ... Millie ... Rush

Truly mind-boggling!

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
From: dwhitney@hamp.hampshire.edu
Subject: New Rep. Quote
Organization: Hampshire College
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 18:14:13 GMT

--An interview with Dan Quayle sounds like it is being filtered through
a second language by two inept translators:
Q: Does it bother you that Ross Perot might get back in the race?
A: I will say this about Ross Perot's supporters.  They deserve a lot
of credit.

The New Republic, Oct. 19, 1992

 
Deb
dwhitney@hamp.hampshire.edu
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bush is Hoover (was: Re: A Simple Question)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 09:09:06 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
Distribution: na
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu) writes:

> As much as I don't like Bush's lack of leadership back home, plus the amount
> of criticism he's receiving about his China policy, I believe he
> knows what he's doing about China, and those moral-grand-stand
> taking Senators and congressmen really don't have a clue about the
> Asian policy.  

Wasn't it Bush who commended the students actions in Tianenmen Square,
saying that American students would do well to emulate their courage
(as if he'd really enjoy seeing American students protesting the policies
of the *US* government), and then turned around and supported the very
government which ruthlessly put down those beginnings of a democratic
movement?

Bush's China policy is as two-faced and expedient as all his other policies.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: tweek@netcom.com (Michael D. Maxfield)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: What's the deal?
Date: 5 Oct 92 23:35:38 GMT
Organization: Movement to Ban or Re-Regulate the CABLE MONOPOLIES

In article <1992Oct4.222251.3951@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>Gee, the name of this group is alt.fan.dan-quayle, but all I see are Quayle
>bashes here.  Could somebody direct me to a group where Republican policies
>and characters are discussed in a more friendly manner?
>-- 
>
>Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu

Ouch...  This is really mean.  Poor guy accidentally forgets to log off
and someone comes around to the terminal and posts this....  I'd rather,
had this been me, to have a post made up and crossposted to
alt.sex.beastiality, alt.religion, and alt.humor asking "What is this about"

Ouch...
From: tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Practical Joke #101? (was Re: Quayle is a Nazi
Date: 26 Sep 1992 20:59:33 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:

>NOTE: AbsoLUTELY none of the rest of us Quayle supporters (well, half
>supporter and half detractor, in my case), are Nazi's. 

"There is absolutely no cannibalism in the British Navy.  And when I say 
none, I mean of course only a certain amount."
				--"Monty Python's Flying Circus".

:-) :-)

Tim Lynch
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bena@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Ben Aveling)
Subject: Re: Outlaw Fire NOW!!!!
Organization: Monash University General Access Unix
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 00:59:31 GMT

[Long list of contributors scragged]
: >> Robert Thank you for clarifying that we CLEARLY
: >> have a NEED to outlaw FIRE as it is DANGEROUS!!!!

What about passing Legislation to make the value of PI equal
to three again.  Some smallish American state did it once ...

	Ben
From: popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Anti-debate strategy (was Re: California polling)
Date: 25 Sep 92 05:07:18 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy

afc@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu writes:

> In article <1992Sep23.185003.28682@nntpserver.chevron.com>, jviv@usmi01.midla
> 
> *intelligent discourse deleted*
> 
> > would probably agree that Gore is the more intelligent.  Gore writes
> > books, Quayle just colors in them.
>          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Does he stay inside the lines?
> 
> A.F. Cockburn
> 
> > -- 
> > John Viveiros     (jviv@chevron.com)
> > Chevron USA        Standard disclaimer applies
> > Midland TX 


Does anybody know if Classic Commics ever did "Plato's Republic"?
Did Dannikins ever get that book read?  Why did not Marylin sit down and 
read it to him?  Inquiring minds want to know.


--
popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, (713) 943-2728 in Houston, Texas
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Indiscretions (and Teddy's comment)
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 92 16:51:52 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


chesnutt@adobe.com (Stan Chesnutt) writes:

> afc@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu writes:

> >Q: Why did Teddy Kennedy say that DQ is not as dumb as it appears?

> I prefer to think that Dan-o is indeed quite a bit more capable than most
> people believe.  Many people who know Quayle have stated this, but the idea
> is not given much credence due to Quayle's constant stream of gaffes.

Uh oh. Sounds like another potential Quayle revisionist. There's a lot
of those people around that seem determined to impose Quayle on the
national scene for the next umpteen years. Well, if it comes to pass,
get used to the deer in the headlights look for a long time to come.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610
From: aschaffe@holodeck.csd.sgi.com (Allan Schaffer)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Handicapping Gore (was Private vs Public)
Date: 3 Oct 92 03:14:20 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: holodeck.csd.sgi.com

pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh) said..
>Maddi Hausmann writes:
>
>>So Dan-oe feels he is at a disadvantage in a debate with Gore because
>>he [Dan-oe] went to public school, while Gore went to private schools.
>
>>Is Dan-oe asking for a handicap?  We could spot him four questions and
>>he'll still lose.  But remember, any advantage he gets also goes to
>>Clinton, right?  After all, Bush went to Andover before he went to
>>Yale.
>
>>Another solution would be that Dan-oe will be allowed to write hints
>>on his wrists and shoe soles, and gets a break every 15 minutes to
>>read his notes in the men's room.
>
>A good start, but I think it still favors Gore.  To make it even, we need
>multiple handicaps.  How about if, in addition to BOTH of your proposals,
>Gore has to hold his breath throughout the length of the debate?  One
>continuous breath, that is -- no breaks for fresh air, or to answer
>questions.   }8-|

Even better!  In addition to all that, whenever Danoe finishes a
statement, the moderator has to turn to Gore and say, "You know, Senator,
he's right."

[with apologies to David Letterman]

Allan
I still like the Gong show idea best.
-- 
Allan Schaffer                                       Notice 
aschaffe@holodeck.csd.sgi.com       Due to budgetary constraints the light at 
aschaffe@netcom.com                 the end of the tunnel is being turned off.
For a free copy of Bill Clinton's economic recovery plan, call 1-800-272-9763.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: yuna@athena.mit.edu (Yuna Huh)
Subject: Re: Principles, principles, principles
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 01:15:33 GMT

>Sorry, although everyone of the Clinton advocates agree that Clinton
>would be less prone to pulling the trigger, I think that is what will
>weaken this country when it comes to any future military confrontation.
>You don't need a leader who will waffle if you want to put pressure on
>an adversary. Agreed, you have to be sensible, but you also have to make
>the opponent stand down and take your threats to resist the aggressor's
>plans completely seriously.

Remember that Clinton was ahead of Bush on the question of using military force
to protect humanitarian aid flights into Bosnia-Hercegovina.  On Sept. 19, Ret.
Adm. William J. Crowe Jr., the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for
Presidents Bush and Reagon, called Clinton "the most qualified man to set us on a
successful course for the future."  Now I don't know about you, but I doubt that
the Admiral would support a man who he thinks would "waffle" under a military
situation.
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:4886 alt.folklore.urban:24827
From: saxe@degas.cs.unc.edu (Eddie Saxe)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Outlaw Fire NOW!!!!
Date: 4 Oct 92 13:16:28 GMT
Followup-To: alt.folklore.urban
Organization: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

In article <1992Oct4.005931.9402@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> bena@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Ben Aveling) writes:
>[Long list of contributors scragged]
>: >> Robert Thank you for clarifying that we CLEARLY
>: >> have a NEED to outlaw FIRE as it is DANGEROUS!!!!
>
>What about passing Legislation to make the value of PI equal
>to three again.  Some smallish American state did it once ...
>
>	Ben

Indiana's House of Representatives tried to make the value of pi used in the
public schools 3.2, but their Senate shot it down, thank goodness.  No other
state has gotten that far.

ObQuaylandUL:  Despite his negative IQ, Dan Quayl never stated that he
               wished he had brushed up on his Latin before he went to Latin
               America.

Eddie "What a waste it is to lose one's pi.  Or to not have a pi.  How true
       that is." Saxe
-- 
 ____/|  Bill the Cat says "Vote Dave Barry | saxe@cs.unc.edu alias
 \ o.O|  for President!"  Actually, he says,| eddie@uncvx2.oit.unc.edu
  =(_)=  "ACK!  THPHTH!" but we're sure that| "That can't be my shirt.  My
    U    he's a Dave Barry supporter.       |  shirt doesn't snore."--G. Marx
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle