HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Debate
Followup-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 13:10:13 GMT


YOU know, in the presidential debate, I thought Perot was a democratic 
plant, there to attack Bush while Clinton remained above the fray.

However, Adm Stcokdale is CLEARLY a republican plant, there to prove that
it is possible to be more incoherent than DQ.

Was anyone else hoping Quayle and Gore would actually get into a fistfight?

r
From: aras@ms.uky.edu (erode)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Debate summery?
Date: 14 Oct 92 02:13:34 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

garrett@Ingres.COM (FRIENDS DON'T LET FRIENDS VOTE REPUBLICAN) writes:

>	I missed the debate! Could someone post a summery of the 
>debate? I turned on the radio just in time to hear the talking-heads
>say that Dannikins didn't do that bad.

>-Garrett

	I only saw the first half hour. I could not stand the
	admiral anylonger (felt sorry for him).
	Till then Gore was SOLID. Quayle seemed to be excited
	and was laughing a lot. But had made no major errors.
	He was definetely doing better than expectations.
	(On CBS they said expections were so low for Quayle that
	all he had to do was go to the podium and speak in
	English!) Since the admiral was very poor Quayle definitely
	will not finish last!
	-aras
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jeffgus@netcom.com (Jeffrey Gustafson)
Subject: Re: Dan Quayle: Attack Puppy Unleashed
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 06:34:45 GMT

jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl) writes:

>|> A reason to be upset with Bush, but hardly a reason to prefer Clinton.
>|> I can't believe the Democrats have managed to summon up the colossal
>|> gall to act as if this tax increase was something they were against.
>|> Bush agreed to the tax increase the Democrats were demanding as part of
>|> a compromise to break the gridlock.  Spending cuts were part of the
>|> agreement, but Congress trashed that part of the agreement as soon as
>|> they got their tax increase.
>|> 
>|> Bush should have known better.  Congress pulled this exact same scam
>|> on Reagan.  He should have demanded spending cuts first.

>Right!  And he should have exercised his powers as president to keep
>the country from sliding to hell in a handbasket!  That was his job,
>and he didn't do it.  Where I'm from, if someone doesn't do their
>job, we fire 'em.   ......

	....and put in someone that will do a worse job?
	Remember it was a their tax hike, not Bush's.

---
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge)
Subject: Re: more bashing
Organization: Paramax Systems Corporation, Paoli PA
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 14:08:45 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.054237.15655@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca>, 
huang@mwilliams.eche.ualberta.ca writes:
|> Can those Quayle bashers find some place else to masturbate?  This
|> place is santified for the genuine fan of The Honourable J. Danforth
            ^^^^^^^^^
|> Quayle.  Please return to the original intent.  Thanks.  

 
  Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary proved unhelpful.  Is the root
  word related, perhaps, to Santa Claus?

  If so, then there should have been a cross-posting to:

        alt.fan.paul-tsongas


  Perhaps the "t" in this neologism is a redundant typo, and the word
  that was intended is "sanified" as in "sanified for your protection." 

  It seems improbable that the intended word was "sanctified."  After
  all, "sanctify" means to set apart for a religious purpose or sacred
  use.  Such as a religious war.


--
 _________________________________________________________________________
|                                 |                                       |
| Herbert Rutledge, aka Train     |                                       |
| Paramax Systems Corporation     | "To post is human; to flame, divine." |
| Valley Forge Labs, M/S GVL-3    |                                       |
| P.O. Box 517, Paoli, PA  19301  |                     ---Alexander Pope |
| Internet: train@.gvl.unisys.com |                                       |
|_________________________________|_______________________________________|

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Subject: Re: Dan Quayle: Attack Puppy Unleashed
Reply-To: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 18:20:57 GMT

In article <1992Oct14.215736.14959@netcom.com>, jeffgus@netcom.com (Jeffrey
Gustafson) writes:
> <U56503@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:
> 
> >                               TAXES
> 

  [irrelevant gibberish about who will make us pay for our excessive spending]

> 
> 	But who's tax plan was it?  Hint:  It wasn't Bush's.

   No, it just has his signature on it.  

   He promised he wouldn't sign it.

   It was just absolutely neccesary.

   So, Bush made a promise he couldn't keep and had to be tortured into
breaking it.  Far out!  What a leader! *snicker*  About the only people with a
good plan for getting government under control are western Kansans.  They are
examining succession.

Dan
Danwell@IASTATE.EDU
From: train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: New Responsibilities for D.Q.
Keywords: Debates, Council on Competitiveness, Help Wanted (Part Time)
Date: 12 Oct 92 17:13:53 GMT
Organization: Paramax Systems Corporation, Paoli PA

In article <7137@transfer.stratus.com>, cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison)
 writes:
|> In article <1992Oct12.152256.6567@gvl.unisys.com> train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com 
(Herbert Rutledge) writes:
|> >  I put it to YOU, some of the most creative minds on the planet:  what
|> >  sould Dan Quayle be doing during a second Bush term (assuming there is
|> >  one)? 
|> 
|> 
|> You're forgetting DQ's two top current jobs.  He would continue doing
|> them, I assume:
|> 
|> 1.	speak to ultra-right-wing folks who then know that they have a
|> 	friend in the Executive branch;
|> 
|> 2.	make gaffs which get covered by the news, worldwide, and by
|> 	contrast make Bush's gaffs look minor.

  I guess that I forgot about these important jobs because I was hung up
  on titles, like "President Pro Tem of the Senate" or other titles held
  by VPs former and current, such as "Head O' Council on Competitiveness"
  [Quayle], "His Accidency" [Ford], or "Buchanan's Marionette" [Agnew].

  Given Jim Baker's well known antipathy towards Our Idol, I wonder if
  D. Q. will find, as one his new assignments, that he is to make sure
  that the room at the Madonna Inn that has the sunken Lincoln Continental
  convertible is properly prepared for presidential, ah, visits ["Dan, get
  over there, and I mean FAST, and put the top down."]


--
 _________________________________________________________________________
|                                 |                                       |
| Herbert Rutledge, aka Train     |                                       |
| Paramax Systems Corporation     | "To post is human; to flame, divine." |
| Valley Forge Labs, M/S GVL-3    |                                       |
| P.O. Box 517, Paoli, PA  19301  |                     ---Alexander Pope |
| Internet: train@.gvl.unisys.com |                                       |
|_________________________________|_______________________________________|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Subject: Re: Undercurrent of Panic
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1992 16:08:16 GMT
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <1992Oct8.143328.26592@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh) writes:
>Cindy Kandolf writes:
>
>>Daniel A Ashlock writes:
>>>   Did you see the nitwit who is trying to make something of
>                     ^^^^^^
>>>Clinton's student trip to Moscow?  Not on UseNet, but out in
>>>what we whimsically refer to as reality?
>
>Apparently, as of yesterday, the nitwit to whom you refer goes by the name
>George Herbert Walker Bush.

    Who, just last week, dismissed the incident as inconsequential to the
election.  No doubt a desperate act by a desperate candidate (to steal a
phrase from the Clinton camp).

-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ.
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: debates
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 13:14:03 GMT

In article <92281.201259KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>
>At least, I -hope- he makes it perfectly clear that not all scientists
>believe 'the sky is falling', as Chicken Little Gore would have us believe.
>
youre right, kurt. im glad you exposed those pinko-eco-fascists for what they
are. Me Im not worried about the future of the earth at all.

I think dupont, etc should gte tax credits for spewing toxics into the air
and water. there's plenty of these two things to go around, so i think we
should encourage their pollution as a way to create JOBS JOBS JOBS.

besides, isnt it perfectly natural that the great lakes are now FLAMMABLE.
and we all know that trees cause most acid rain.

-rob, been readin ronnie ray-guns speeches too much....
From: dejst5+@pitt.edu (David   E Joslin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Vice Shrub Won.
Date: 14 Oct 92 05:21:48 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

Elizabeth G. Levy writes:
>Yup, I think Our Man Dan actually won.  He came out there shooting,
>was aggressive with the occassional little fact, and didn't make an
>obvious gaffe.

I liked the way Molly Ivens put it on Nightline.  Paraphrasing:
"A lot of people thought that Dan Quayle was downright dim.  Now
we see that he might even be average.  Oh goody."

But, of course, that was all it took for the Danbot to "win."  

>1) I want a President who tells the truth... -- The Danster himself
>	[Was it only me, or did other people have visions of
>	 Iran-contra and Iraq-gate, not to mention "Read My Lips"
>	 a-dancing through my head?]

Why have Clinton and Gore not thrown Iran-Contra right back in the
faces of Bush and Quayle when they question Clinton's honesty?
Any ideas?  Saving it for the next debate?  Taking Bush's word for
it that he really was out of the loop?  Afraid it might backfire?

David
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: slarsen@berlin.helios.nd.edu (susan larsen)
Subject: Re: Weekly Reader Survey
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 15:59:00 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.045514.20383@news.vanderbilt.edu> mwmv@athena.cas.vanderbilt.edu (Michael Mogensen-Vermillion) writes:
>In article <1992Oct9.033622.3739@tamsun.tamu.edu> achin@math.tamu.edu writes:
>>The "Weekly Reader," a periodical for elementary-school-age readers
>>(they claim a readership of K-10th grade, but any reader older than
>>9 has a serious learning disability) has announced its mock poll
>>results:  56% Bush, 44% Clinton.  They further noted that Bush's
>>support was especially strong among the younger students (K-4).
>>
>>The mentality level of Bush-Quayle's appeal has turned out to
>>be just as I expected.
>
>I hate to sound like an alarmist but I read that this poll has picked the
>actual winner of the race ecery time for about 30 years.
>
>Yikes.

Maybe this will make you feel better:  In my daughter's fifth grade 
class, the poll results were as follows:  Clinton - 23, Perot - 7, 
Bush - 0.  This was the same class that accurately predicted the 
Dukakis drubbing in 1988 by only giving him 8 votes to Bush's 
21.  You all will of course forgive the children for 1988, they were 
only first graders then.

Sharing the same home state as Vice President Quayle did not help 
the Bush ticket in this classroom.  Since these kids learned how 
to spell potato in third grade, perhaps they did not want to throw 
their support to someone operating at a lower grade level...........


Another quality product from the Indiana public school system:
Sue Larsen
slarsen@berlin.helios.nd.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cass8806@elan.glassboro.edu (KYLE CASSIDY)
Subject: oh danny boy
Organization: Rowan College of New Jersey
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 18:56:03 GMT

well i must say, dan was on the tack last night. sharp as a ball. he had a 
great comeback on that line "al, inhale" i wonder who thought it up for him. 
he has proved himself to be a formidible..., uh, he has shown that he is NOT 
the buffoon that we all thought he was. in fact, he has shown himself to be 
an entirely DIFFERENT type of buffoon. although he make a few misstatements, 
well, he's allowed to isn't he? everybody has a job to do in this country. 
dan's is to make us laugh.

i think. suddenly i'm very afraid.

kc
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: more bashing
Date: 8 Oct 92 21:03:28 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <1992Oct8.200315.1@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz> hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Anthony 'SCHWAibo' Hobbs) writes:
>In article <1992Oct7.054237.15655@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca>, huang@mwilliams.eche.ualberta.ca () writes:
>> Can those Quayle bashers find some place else to masturbate?  This
>> place is santified for the genuine fan of The Honourable J. Danforth
>> Quayle.  Please return to the original intent.  Thanks.  
>
>I dunno what drugs *you're* taking, friend, but Quayle-bash *is* the original
>intent. Don't you know NUTTIN'?

He's a NEWBIE  NEWBIE.



--
"Moors."  "Moops."  "Moors."  "Moops."  Psssssssssssss.....
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:5535 alt.politics.bush:9517 alt.politics.clinton:11026
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: Thoughts on the 2nd debate
Date: 16 Oct 1992 18:17:57 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) writes:
>Strangest moment: when he said that "portable"
>was a "big word, I know". Just where does he rate the intelligence of
>the voters?

Not really strange if you stop to think about it.  For the last 4 years
he's been dealing with Dan, for whom "portable" *is* a big word!

							--  Michal
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: bumperstickers
Date: 8 Oct 92 03:28:22 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <1992Oct8.021507.15285@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca> huang@mwilliams.eche.ualberta.ca () writes:
>I saw two bumperstickers.  One reads "Friends don't let friends vote
>Democrat," and the other, "Vote Republican.  Your country is a
>terrible thing to waste."  Too bad that you Quayle bashers have no
>friends.  Have fun with a president who will always say yes to Teddy and
>and Howard and Barney and Patricia.  Enjoy his "revenue enhancement" 
>as well.

Huh?  Where did you see the bumper stickers?  You're in Canada.


--
"Moors."  "Moops."  "Moors."  "Moops."
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Subject: Re: New Quayle Quote (NY Times, 10/7/92)
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1992 15:57:07 GMT
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <1992Oct9.151104.14375@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> leo@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (leonard.oppenheimer) writes:
>
>I am the first to admit that Quayle has had some bad goofs, like potato etc.
>However, I find that:
>
>a) He almost always seems to come out on the correct and proper side of the
>issues that he has dealt with, and has been a consistent and steadfast
>supporter of those causes that would bring this country back to to its
>senses from many of the excesses of the loony left.  On the issues of legal
>reform, family values, support for Israel, and the importance of free
>enterprise, he has been an important advocate of mainstream American values.

    "Correct and proper", huh?  According to whom?  *You*?  Your use of
catchphrases like "looney left" and "family values" identifies you as
another republiclone non-entity, IMNSHO.

>b) The media (and this newsgroup) are extremely unfair to him.  As has been
>stated many times, Murphy Brown is a perfect example.  The issue was so
>twisted and convoluted, and so different from the thrust of what was an
>excellent speech with an important message, that it was truly deplorable to
>anyone with a sense of fair play.

    Amazing!  These JDQ-defenders tend to come around just often enough to
keep things lively.  Do you guys communicate with each other and take turns
coming to Our Boye's rescue?

    The VP debate is coming....get those VCR's ready!
 
-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ. 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: griffith@acuson.com (Paul Griffiths)
Subject: Re: Stockdale
Organization: Acuson; Mountain View, California
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 23:49:21 GMT

jwd5@po.CWRU.Edu (Joseph W. Deitrick) writes:


>no, but he did remind me of the zealous reverend from the Porky's
>movies.

>				Hrothgar
>-- 
>jwd5@po.CWRU.EDU(Hrothgar)

	I think what Stockdale really drove home, was
how irrelevant a Military career is to politics.  
His twenty five years of Navy life did little or
nothing to prepare him for politics.  Granted
he had some good digs, but I suspect you or I could
have stood in between both Gore and Quayle and really
had a field day. 
		-Paul

I was really suprised that Gore let Quayle get away
with the "clean air act" being signed by Bush...
Sure it was signed by Bush, but Dan himself spent
the next few months taking any of the guts out of
it...turning it into a useless piece of legislation...
I really was hoping to see Danno squirm explaining
the infamous "commitee" he chairs.
From: afc@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: A vote for Qualye!
Date: 7 Oct 92 16:03:49 -0500

Clinton and Gore were here at the University of Florida yesterday.  They
drew a wildly enthusiastic crowd of about 18,000.  (Just for comparison,
that is about 17,300 more people than voted for Dukakis at UF in 1988.)

Anyway, on to DQ-mania:

Clinton remarked that Bush's first act was to pick Dan the Quail, while
Clinton's was to pick Albert the Alligator (loud cheers, local humor).
This lame attempt to pretend that Al Gore was a cartoon character like
Dano really upset me.  I've heard Dano talk and I've heard Al talk, and
frankly, he's no Dan Quayl.

Folks, THE DEMOCRATS HAVE A HUMOR GAP!  If we elect Clinton/Gore, we won't
have a bumbling idiot as vicepresident anymore!  No more snotty jokes, no
more a.f.d-q, no more silly quotes!  Preventing this is the best reason to 
vote Bushe/Quayl!

A. F. Cockburn
From: wilson@glitch.cs.jhu.edu (Dwight Wilson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: New Quayle Quote (NY Times, 10/7/92)
Date: 8 Oct 92 18:29:28 GMT
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University CS Department

In article <7069@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> dejst5+@pitt.edu (David   E Joslin) writes:
>I'm surprised I haven't seen this one here yet.  Dan's statement is
>not all that pathetic (for Dan) until you see what question he was
>trying to answer.
>

Does anyone else see the potential here for a new game show?
Quayle Jeopardy!
Almost a shame we have such a short time left to play it.

-Dwight
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The Veep Debate
Date: 15 Oct 92 21:27:45 GMT
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <1992Oct15.171646.26801@netcom.com> erics@netcom.com (Eric Smith) writes:
>
>Didn't Bush make a pledge in his 1988 campaign to create a million
>new jobs, or some number like that? I can't understand why Clinton
>and Gore have failed to bring this up as an example of Bush's failed
>rhetoric.

    Actually the pledge was for 30,000,000 new jobs.  I agree that this is
appropriate fodder for the Clinton campaign.  Maybe they're waiting for the
less-controlled debates to bring it up, to make sure GHWB can't squirm out
of answering for it as easily.

-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ.
From: popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Undercurrent of Panic
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 07:37:55 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy

sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta) writes:

> cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black) writes:
> 
> > In article <1992Oct8.143328.26592@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> pat@sphinx.phys
> > >Cindy Kandolf writes:
> > >
> > >>Daniel A Ashlock writes:
> > >>>   Did you see the nitwit who is trying to make something of
> > >                     ^^^^^^
> > >>>Clinton's student trip to Moscow?  Not on UseNet, but out in
> > >>>what we whimsically refer to as reality?
> > >
> > >Apparently, as of yesterday, the nitwit to whom you refer goes by the name
> > >George Herbert Walker Bush.
> > 
> >     Who, just last week, dismissed the incident as inconsequential to the
> > election.  No doubt a desperate act by a desperate candidate (to steal a
> > phrase from the Clinton camp).
> 
> As detailed by the Clinton/Gore campaign in The Washington Post yesterday,
> this is part of the Bush/Quayle campaign's attempt to lift the whole
> John Major/Tory Party strategy and transplant it here in the States.
> The Tory campaign's major tactical moves were to:
> 
>     1) Lie about their opponents fiscal policy with regard to taxation
>     2) Portray their opponents as communist sympathizers during the
>        Cold War
>     3) Repeat ad nauseum the belief that the status quo would prevail
> 
> Sound familiar? Poor Joe Biden got hung out to dry for paraphrasing parts
> of a Neil Kinnock speech. I think these bastards should be crucified.
> 
> 
> Sunil Gupta
> Monsoon Software, Inc.
> sg@monsoon.com

There is a nasty little article in the October 12 92 issue of New 
Republic about George Bush.

It re-examines the contradictory claims about George's being shot
down in WWII.  And whether he abandoned his crewmates to their deaths
or not.
George has told this story two different times and the stories contradict 
each other. He may be lying about what happened.  One witness to this 
event was a tailgunner in the plane just in front of Bush's plane.
This man, Chester Mierzejewski has contradicted Bush on what happened.

And to quote Mierzejewski, "I knew two guys who would be glad if george 
Bush had been a draft-dodger."

This is real timely since Bush has decided to use Clinton's draft record 
and his trip To Moscow in the nastiest negative way he can devise.
This is the latest New republic and is out on the stands now.
If Clinton'sdraft record and his Moscow trip all of a sudden
disappear as a campaign theme suddenly, now you know why.

Pope Charle  Subgenius Pope Of Houston    Slacked to the Max

--
popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, (713) 943-2728 in Houston, Texas
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dan attacked by angry mob!
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 03:06:25 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


garrett@Ingres.COM (FRIENDS DON'T LET FRIENDS VOTE REPUBLICAN) writes:

> cldavies@nyx.cs.du.edu (cindy davies)                     writes...

> >I can't speak for Iowa, but, here in South Dakota, you might speak your mind,
> >but we don't go for those "long haired hippie freaks"(tm) making a spectacale
> >of themselves.

> Coming from a small, backwards town myself, I think that just having long
> hair is enough of a spectacle to annoy most of the people you are talking
> about. 

Really?  In the '60s, yes, I could understand, but now in the '90s?
Incredible.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610