HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Re: Celtic Roster -- Who is on ...
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 92 05:24:53 GMT
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.

In article <1992Sep11.214129.15058@news.mentorg.com> michael_robbins@mentorg.com writes:
>Now that the mighty celtics have the X-Man, does any one out there have a
>complete roster (signed players with speculation always welcome)?  
>
>I don't get much Celtic news while here in the middle of Blazer-land.
>
>thanks,
>
>mick
>

Their current roster looks something like this

C: Robert Parish, Joe Kleine (Vrankovic belongs to the Cs, but is expected
				to go to Europe)
PF: Kevin McHale, Ed Pinckney, Darrin Morningstar
	(But who knows whether Kevin or Ed will start)
SF: Xavier McDaniel, Kevin Gamble, Rick Fox
SG: Reggie Lewis, ???? (probably play either Fox or Gamble in backup)
PG: Dee Brown, Sherman Dougglas

Unsigned players who might be : 
	Vrankovic - Doubtful, probably off to Europe
	Walter Berry, Joe Wolf - possible, but they also are reported to be
		going to Europe
	Jon Barry - unsigned, probably won't be...

Other news...  Rumors that the Cs are still trying to make a trade to get
Tom Gugliotta from the Bullets (presumably for either Gamble/Fox and 
a draft pick).  Also rumors that the Cs might go after either Cadillac 
Anderson or Charles Smith, though I doubt they can without a big trade.

Also, I have heard a few rumors that the Cs might be interested in 
Ol' Dwayne Schintzus, God Forbid.  Apparantly Red was high on him out of
college and believes he has the talent.  Too many questions about his
health and desire though.  
	


-- 
David T. Meeks                    ||" We are jigsaw pieces, aligned on the 
VMark Software, Inc.              ||  perimeter edge, 
uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  interlocked through a missing piece"
davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||" ...This world is totally Fugazi"
From: andy@rocky.gte.com (Andrew Busa)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: X-man to Boston
Date: 11 Sep 92 17:21:52 GMT
Organization: GTE Contel Federal Systems
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5


 
Woops,
I meant that Gamble scored 15 points a game not five, god I hate typing.  As
for not noticing how well Fox is as a defender, all you need to know is that
Dean Smith personally hand wrote a letter to Chris Ford telling him that his
strongest suite would be defense.

Andy
From: iacurtop@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Iacurto Paul)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: BEST POINT GUARD IN NBA
Date: 9 Sep 92 18:05:45 GMT
Organization: Universite de Montreal

Who is the best point guard in the NBA?
In my opinion it could only be one of two choices:
John Stockton or Tim Hardaway (don't give me this Kevin Johnson, Marc Price,     Isiah Thomas, Derek harper bull shit)

Here is a quick look at the two:

STOCKTON
- leads league in assists every year
- lead league in steals in 91-92
- scores about 15 points a game
- team leader

HARDAWAY
- scores more than Stockton (about 22 a game)
- not as many assists
- more turnovers
- less steals
- not as good defensively
- but penetrates the lane better than Stockton (with that "killer" UTEP 2 STEP)
- more of a flashy point guard than Stockton

                    I need as many replies as possible
From: dh4w+@andrew.cmu.edu (Daniel Reid Helsten)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Will the NBA ever let
Date: 5 Sep 92 00:51:59 GMT
Organization: Freshman, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


I would like to take a sort of opinion poll.  Do you think the NBA would
ever let a team like Utah (the smallest NBA market) win the championship?

I believe the NBA has there own way of controlling the outcome of very
"costly games.  Say Utah played Cleveland last year in the finals.  The
NBA would have lost literally millions of dollars in TV and promotions. 
Consequently both teams lost in very much the same way, and in my
opinion, some poor reffing.  Is it no coincidence that the the teams in
the finals, with the exception of Portland, have come from very large
cities.  

Any other opinions, I would love to find out what other people think of this.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: bewillia@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Maj. Devon McKnight)
Subject: Re: Will Bird become a broadcastor?
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 92 14:47:56 EDT

	As far as I've heard, Bird has no plans to become a broadcaster.  He
has been hired as a "special assistant" to Dave Gavitt.  
	Honestly, I'm not sure how good Larry would be as a broadcaster.  I
always felt that Magic would be a better broadcaster, and after seeing him
embarass himself on NBC, I think it might be best for Larry to stay in the
front office.

			- Dev
From: gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary L. Newell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: SHOES
Date: 11 Sep 92 18:08:34 GMT
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <1992Sep11.154939.17660@cc.umontreal.ca>, iacurtop@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Iacurto Paul) writes:
> I am looking for a good pair of basketball shoes for indoor play.
> 1- $ 100 at most
> 2 - must be black
>     Can anybody help me?

Well, I'm not black but I can suggest that you maybe check out your
local athletic shoe store and see what is on the market. Of course if you
are looking for used shoes then I have a pair of tie-dyed converse that
I'll let go for about $50....

			gln



Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: heiser@fretz.enet.dec.com (Michael A. Heiser)
Subject: Re: BEST POINT GUARD IN NBA
Reply-To: heiser@fretz.enet.dec.com (Michael A. Heiser)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation - Phoenix, AZ
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 17:11:58 GMT


>
>In article <1992Sep14.193318.11715@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com>, heiser@fretz.enet.dec.com (Michael A. Heiser) writes:
>> 
>> Now that Magic is gone, Hardaway and KJ share the throne.  Stockton doesn't
>> share the dimensions (assists & defense only) that the other two do.
>> --
>
>
>Yup, you're right Mike. Stockton's lifetime 50+ FG%, 80+ FT%, and 
>32% 3PT% really s*cks! :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
>
>	Ok, Ok, so he's only good at offense, defense, and passing..... :-)
>
>
>-- 
!	Jim  Halpin

Jim, in head-to-head meetings, Tim and KJ severely school the poor boy.

--

    Mike
    
    "in this day & age...music performed by humans...hum?!" 
       - wilde silas tomkyn
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: wung@puttgen.ee.gatech.edu (Peter Wung)
Subject: Re: BEST POINT GUARD IN NBA
Reply-To: wung@puttgen.ee.gatech.edu
Organization: Sun Microsystems
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 15:35:05 GMT

In article EegDvIW00awIFQWkxP@andrew.cmu.edu, Christopher Glenn Huegle <ch44+@andrew.cmu.edu> () writes:
>| Of course, Price was a shooting guard in college......

Actually, Price was both point AND shooting guard in college.  His backcourt mate 
was Bruce Dalrymple, atypical NYC type scrapper. He had a really ugly shot 
and had negligible ball handling skills.  Dalrymple's forte was picking up the 
junk rebounds and scoring in the paint by darting through the crowd.  Price 
pretty much had to be the ball handler and the shooter on that team because no
one else could shoot.  His center was Yvon Josephs, a Jaitian Volleyball player 
turned basketball center, the forwards were John `Gotta love the Heat' Salley, and 
Duane `Is Nique still Hurt?' Ferrell.  

>|The plain facts are  that without Price the Cavs are only an average
>|team, with Price they WILL win a Championship.  Not many other teams can
>|say that about their point guard.  But in my opinion Price is the best
>|current point guard just because he has the best combination of shooting
>|(where he's arguably the best), passing, ball handling, offense
>|handling, and defense(where he's only adequate, but he is adequate).  
>|
>|		Chris



****************************************************************************
*Peter Wung				Email:wung@ee.gatech.edu	   * 
*Electric Power Laboratory		Snail mail: 33787 Ga. Tech Station * 
*School of Electrical Engineering		    Atlanta, GA 30332      *
*Georgia Institute of Technology				    	   *        *Atlanta, Georgia							   *
*   	"Pass, Set, CRUSH!"...						   * 
*  	Well, 2 out of 3 ain't bad for a short, fat guy.  		   *
*									   *
****************************************************************************

Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: minor@rtsg.mot.com (Kevin Minor)
Subject: Re: The Two Trades
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 18:52:02 GMT

gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:

|>My four cents on the two trades:

|>1. Indiana gets Pooh Richardson and Sam Mitchell, Minnesota gets
|>   Chuck Person and Micheal Williams.

|>Williams (15ppg, 8apg) and Richardson (16ppg, 8apg) are a fair
|>exchange.  Mitchell's numbers are no match for Person.  So Indiana
|>just wanted gets rid of Person, I guess.

|>Another good thing for the T-Wolves is that Williams is starting a seven
|>year contract and Person has 5 years left on his.

What in the *&$% were the Pacers thinking ?
Williams in my opinion played pretty good D and for a team who has
never been happy with any point guard, I though he was alright.

But getting rid of Person and getting Sam Mitchell... ???
What in the hell...

It is awfully tough being from Indiana...
(It is a good think I live in Chicago now... :-)  )
-- 
	/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\
	|	Kevin Minor	UUCP: ...uunet!mcdchg!motcid!minor	|
	|			Mail: minor@rtsg.mot.com		|
	\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Subject: Re: The X Factor
Followup-To: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Reply-To: koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Harry Koehnemann)
Organization: Arizona State University
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 20:38:17 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.190115.15422@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> u_nique@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Jerray Wei) writes:
>
>Phoenix to NY...not enough balls to go around, never mind the fact that it
>was Tom Chambers who was shooting the bricks.  Too many guns on that team
>for another one.

I think it's more for the reason we just saw - X was to become a free
agent at the end of the year.  Phx didn't want to extend the contract
and got what they could out of the guy (Mustaf and a couple 2nds).
It was a gamble getting him from Seattle anyways and he didn't pan into
the dominate PF everyone hoped.  So, get what you can out of him before
he's gone with nothing to show for it.

--
Harry Koehnemann
koehnema@enuxha.eas.asu.edu
From: bz978@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Charles E Gibbs)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: The Pacers New Lineup ( was Re: The Two Trades)
Date: 10 Sep 1992 00:18:11 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bz978@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Charles E Gibbs)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Well, neglecting the salary structure, the Indiana Pacers didn't make out too
bad.  Pooh Richardson's presence and Chuck Person's absence goes along way
toward team unity, which is something the Pacers lack.  Detlef Schrempf 
can go to small forward. If Rik Smits has indeed improved as an offensive
threat, they are still a playoff-worthy team.  The lineup would be:

      PG - Pooh Richardson
      SG - Reggie Miller
      SF - Detlef Schrempf
      PF - Sam Mitchell
       C - Rik Smits






BTW, has anyone been looking at the Eastern Conference as a whole.  I mean
Chicago, Cleveland, and New York are strong.  Boston, Miami, and New Jersey
should make the playoffs barring injuries.  But there are 6 or 7 teams that
I think could be legitimate playoff threats.  The Pacers and Charlotte are
front-runners.  Detroit has a solid backcourt.  Orlando, with everyone 
healthy and Shaq's presence, should be a factor.  Atlanta will get Dominique
and some rebounding help.  Milwaukee and Philly maybe outsiders but can't be
ruled out.  I think it will be an interesting season.

Charles Gibbs
From: blip@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Bryan Lip)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS, PERTH TO HOST '94 WORLD TITLES
Date: 15 Sep 1992 05:09:08 GMT
Organization: The University of Westrn Australia
NNTP-Posting-Host: tartarus.uwa.edu.au

hiew@cs.uwa.oz.au (HIEW Hong Liang) writes:

>In <191mq8INNebu@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> blip@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Bryan Lip) writes:

>>The tournament is set to be played at the Burswood Resort Casino (Hotel)
>>at the 35,000 seat Burswood Superdome. The Hotel should adequaltely
>>house all the competitors, plus the world class resort has the largest
>>Casino in the Southern Hemisphere. Burswood being located adjacent to
>>Perth's CBD.

>Get real, pal !

>The Burswood Superdome in Perth, used as a BASKETBALL stadium, has only a
>capacity of 8500 seats (source: the Burswood Management). As a concert
>hall, it could have about 20,000 seats. No way is it gonna fit 35,000.

8500 seating for a tennis match maybe (re: hopman cup) but have you ever
been to the hopman cup and noticed how they structered the stadium... i
guess not. they bring the stand into between 1/2 and a 1/3 the size of the
stadium itself, because the demand is not there for capacity over 8500
for the hopman cup. As a concert hall it has a capacity of approximately
28,500 according to a prospectus for the Burswood Resort which was
floated on the stock market in 1988. As concert or a dirt bike stadium it
would house 28,500 such as the mick jagger concert. But if the seating
is brought closer to the middle of the stadium, i figure you could get
around 5000 extra seats. so about 35,000 would be the figure.

There is no doubt the demand would be there. 


>And I don't know about the Southern Hemisphere, but in Australia alone,
>Jupiter's Casino in Brisbane has got to be bigger.

I hold shares in Burswood, and i know it quite a bit more than
some people. Jupiters is not larger than Burswood. Have you ever been to
Jupiter's ? you could see the difference.... maybe go there and take a look
before you talk.

>Where are you getting your information from? Are you on Perth's bidding
>committee?

>hiew.

hiew and your smart ideas....



Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: bewillia@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Maj. Devon McKnight)
Subject: Re: FIVE ALIVE
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 92 23:04:59 EDT

In article <1992Sep2.184734.2536@cc.umontreal.ca> iacurtop@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Iacurto Paul) writes:

>5 white guys who can dunk that aren't 7"0:
>Rex Chapman
>Name 4 more if you can!!

	Mark Acres, Mark Alarie, Frank Brickowski, Tom Chambers, Vlade Divac,
Chris Dudley, Craig Ehlo, Danny Ferry (but who cares, really), Joe Kleine, 
Larry Krystowiak, Bill Laimbeer (believe it or not), Todd Lichti, Dan Majerle,
Sarunas Marciulionis, Kevin McHale, Chris Mullin, Jim Petersen, Drazen 
Petrovic, Brian Quinnett, Kurt Rambis, Fred Roberts, Danny Schayes, Detlef
Schrempf, Rony Seikaly, Mike Smith, Tom Tolbert, Jeff Turner, Kiki Vandeweghe,
Joe Wolf.

	Okay, that's 34.




>5 guys I would invite to my house party:
>Chris Mullin     - bring the beer
>Roy Tarpley      - bring the "stuff"
>Magic Johnson    - bring the babes
>Charles Barkley  - what's a party without him?
>Anybody else know of a good party animal?

	Well, Mel Turpin could bring the food. :-)








Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: ME599027@brownvm.brown.edu (Devasis Chatterjee)
Subject: Celts sign Xavier
Organization: Brown University
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 11:35:36 GMT

The Celtics radio announcer Glen Ordway has just
revealed on Boston's sports talk radio station that the
Celtics have scheduled a news conference at 10 am
to announce the signing of Xavier McDaniel to a multi-
year contract. McDaniel will be taking the salary slot
that was left when Larry Bird retired.

Dave
From: gary@ccs.northeastern.edu (Gary Duhaney)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: Jordan >= Magic && Bird
Date: 6 Sep 92 05:01:13 GMT
Organization: Comp. Sci. @ NU

In article <1992Sep4.221953.9423@oracle.us.oracle.com> rpierce@oracle.com (Russell Pierce) writes:
>>When Jordan was playing guard he dished out some really nice passes.
>
>	What??  Jordan pretty much always play guard.

No shit.  I was referring to point guard.

>
>>No one went wild about it.  Also, Jordans role is not to set up
>
>	Maybe no one you know, I've seen fans go nuts after MJ
>	makes a killer assist.

So have I, but not to the extent they do of Magic/Bird.  No where
near as much.
>
>>his teammates as it was for Bird/Magic.
>
>	I'm sorry but I always thought that basketball was a TEAM
	^^^^^^^^^^
>	game and that it is every players role to set up his other

You like Wilt "100 pts/women in one game" Chamberlain.  Like Karl "I'm
probably the only 30pt scorer who has <3 apg" Malone.  Like Mark "I
just get out of the way" Eaton.  There are quite a few of them.
Living in a dream world are we, or just haven't watched too much
bball.  But I accept your apology for being ignorant.

>	teammates.  Even though they play different positions, 
>	all players should be doing their best to create opportunities
>	for themselves as well as their teammates.  I also think you 

Ahhhhhh.  The mindless utopian version of basketball.  Been
watching Hosiers again.

>	are being a little anal about Jordan not getting credit for
>	being a great passer.  Pretty much everyone I know thinks
>	he's a great passer and team player.  

DUUUHHHHH.  My point wasn't that he wasn't a great passer or team
player or that he got no credit for being a great passer.  DUUUHHHHH.

The original article said that Jordan wasn't as good a passer
Bird/Magic.  My point was that people pay more attention to his
athletic ability and often ignore his other ability.  I frankly
couldn't care less about whether he gets credit of whether he's
a great passer etc..  Just making an argument for someone.
>
>
>		Russ
From: u_nique@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Jerray Wei)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: Re: X-man to Boston
Date: 11 Sep 92 14:38:28 GMT
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore

In article <BuDH3y.67B@ora.com> ellie@ora.com (Ellie Cutler) writes:
>
>Right off the bat, McDaniel gives Boston a tough, uptempo player and
>scorer who can go out and get 40 on any given night.  This will pick up
>Bird's scoring slack and take pressure off Reggie Lewis to take/make
>all the shots.  Why this comes at the small forward position is a bit
>of a puzzle, but a natural byproduct of the "best available" player
>school of thought.  Would you rather have the first post-Bird Celtic
>be the X-Man or Cadillac Anderson?  Also, the Celts are most likely not
>done with their search for the true big man.

What do you mean?  The Celtics are certainly not stocked at small forward,
in fact, I would say that McDaniel is the only real one they have.  Gamble
started there, but he wasn't a real rebounding force and couldn't score
inside.  Minus Bird now, they can really use McDaniel's post up punch and
rebounding from the three spot.

>The biggest questions this signing raises are:  
>
>Q. What do the C's need with another 6-7 man?

The difference is that this 6'7'' man can probably grab 500 rebounds at least
with the Celtics.

>A. Filling up the SF spot makes it likely that Gavitt will try to move
>Gamble without having to worry about picking up his scoring slack.  It
>takes Fox out of the starting rotation - where I was really hoping to
>see him this year, but Fox is flexible enough to play some minutes at
>both PF and SG.  It also gives them the possiblity of moving Fox - not
>a desirable move, but if it could help land someone like Charles Smith...

I hope the Celts don't try to move Gamble.  From when I've seen him, he's
shot awfully well.  Personally, I don't think Fox is much of an asset to
Boston.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU (Terry Wong)
Subject: Re: Suns
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 92 05:21:11 GMT

In article <92248.214633IO20738@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>, IO20738@MAINE.MAINE.EDU writes:
|> The Suns will have these players, as far as I know.
|>  F Charles Barkley
|>  F Tom Chambers
|>  C Mark West
|>  G Kevin Johnson
|>  G Dan Marjerle (he is awesome, isn't he!)
|> 
|>  F Tim Perry
|>  F Cedric Ceballos
|>  G Danny Ainge
|>  F Kurt Rambis(?-Is this guy still around?)

Tim Perry was part of the package that went to Philadelphia for Barkley.
And what about Jerod Mustaf and Negele Knight?

					terry@garfield.Stanford.EDU
From: krishna@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Krishna R Akkina)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
Subject: POOL
Date: 15 Sep 92 22:44:14 GMT
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

Are there any pools for basketball (kind of like the one that Dave Woods is running for football)?              
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: wrl@pmafire.inel.gov (William Lechner)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 20:43:02 GMT
Organization: WINCO
Subject: Re: Pacers "bad" trade
Summary: 
Followup-To: 
Organization: WINCO
Keywords: 

In article <1992Sep10.142829.13959@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> u_nique@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Jerray Wei) writes:
>
>I think most people are forgetting what Indiana might get out of losing Chuck
>Person.  I don't think it's the fact that Miller will be getting more shots,
>but how about more time for their best player, Detlef Schrempf?  Why did Rik
>Smits get so few minutes last year?  He isn't awesome, but certainly having
>the 7'4'' center in there who shoots 51% and blocks shots is better than the
>rejects they had there before...and I think it came to the fact that having
>Smits in there took away shots from other guys with egos.  Well, the biggest
>ego is gone, and at least the Pacers will have more offensive balance, not
>just guys chucking it up from outside.
>

I tend to agree about the "loss" of Person.  Aside from his ego, however,
was his inability to drive the basket.  This has always been Chuck's big
weakness IMHO.  With Schrempf in at "small" forward and a healthy Smits
in a center, Indiana will become more of an inside threat.  Thus enabling
more uncontested outside shots for Miller and Richardson.  I was dis-
couraged at first with the loss of Williams but it had to be done to
allow the Pacers the opportunity to become a better NBA team.

Bill


Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.pro
From: art30248@nusunix3.nus.sg (NG LING LING)
Subject: Re: Best players by position
Organization: National University of Singapore
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 07:53:47 GMT

<IO20738@MAINE.MAINE.EDU> writes:
:     Here are my opinions on the five best players at each positions.
: 
:

stuff deleted...
 
:                      C  1-David Robinson
:                         2-Patrick Ewing
:                         3-Hakeem Olajuwon
:                         4-Shaquile O'Neille
:                         5-Brad Daugherty
: 
awww...are you trying to tell me that Robinson is better than Ewing in
all categories ? Let's start...

1.  Scoring....even
2.  Rebounding...even
3.  Defense/Blocking Shots...Robinson (slightly)
4.  Passing...Ewing (by a long way)
5.  Ball control...even
6.  Temperament...even
7.  Leadership...Ewing
8.  Desire...Ewing.

...anyhow, that's what I think.


:  SF  1-Charles Barkley             PF  1-Karl Malone
:      2-Scottie Pippen                  2-Dennis Rodman
:      3-Chris Mullin                    3-Derrick Coleman
:      4-Dominique Wilkins               4-Larry Johnson
:      5-James Worthy                    5-Kevin Willis
: 
:      Remember, these are just my opinions.  I made this up of the
: top of my head so there is probably some people I forgot about.  I
: also am not sure if Rodman is a power forward.  He always seems to
: guard SF's on defense.  What do you think?
:
well, 2 things...Rodman, Malone, Barkley...nobody knows what position
they play anyway...nobody cares...they get the job done!