HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rafal@utstat.uucp (Rafal Kustra (summer student))
Subject: mount
Organization: University of Toronto, Dept. of Statistics
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:20:04 GMT

I also started to have some problems with mount/umount.
After freeing some disk-space from DOG I mkfs -c on it to use it
as my usr partition.(hda3). It's 'bout 15M. My previous partition (32M)
was all I've got before for Linux. When I mount hda3 now, everything
goes smoothly and I can use it. But df reports only root partition
(hda2) and says "can't open hda3" or something like that. I'm
also unable to unmount it- that give me error 16 (device busy). BWT
I've made sure it's Not busy.
Sometimes, espacially when I mount it by hand and not from rc, umount
proceeds smoothly but df then reports my root partition nicely
and usr partition twice(!) now. Needles to add it doesn't get 
unmounted.
I use mount from rootimage 96 but umount from 95 version, and Linux 
96cpl1.
Gotta try it with 96ver umount, but there is obviously s-thing wrong.

				Rafal


Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: cummings@hammer.Prime.COM (Kevin Cummings)
Subject: Re: Mtools
Organization: Prime Computer R&D
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 21:28:44 GMT

In article <weRpjJ600WB_4GuG4h@andrew.cmu.edu>, Tao Jiang <tj2n+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> 
> Hi!  When I used mtools as root, it worked fine.  But as non-root, it
> complained that:
> 
> init: open: Operation not permitted
> 
> Any clues?

If I remember right, mtools wants to open /dev/hd* devices.  After I
installed the new 0.96 root disk, these devices had access rights only
to user root, and group disk (rw-rw----).  Make mtools setgid, and
chown it to bin.disk.  That should fix the problem.  It did for me.

=================================================================
Kevin J. Cummings                       PrimeService
20 Briarwood Road                       A Computervision Company
Framingham, Mass.                       500 Old Connecticut Path
					Framingham, Mass.
Work:  cummings@primerd.Prime.COM
Home:  cummings@kjc386.framingham.ma.us

Std. Disclaimer: "Mr. McKittrick, after careful consideration,
		  I've come to the conclusion that your new
		  defense system SUCKS..."   --  War Games
=================================================================
From: eric@tantalus.dell.com (Eric Youngdale)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: say goodbye to shoelace
Date: 22 Jul 92 13:27:08 GMT

Keywords: 

In article <BrrJBp.C2t@news.cso.uiuc.edu> thoth@uiuc.edu (Ben Cox) writes:
>pmacdona@sol.UVic.CA (Peter MacDonald) writes:
>
>>With the addition of the DOS FS, the kernel has grown to over 
>>256K, which, if my memory serves me correctly,  was the max 
>
>If you don't compile in the SCSI drivers, it still slides in at >just<
>under 256k.

	If you have a 486 or a 386 with a 387, you do not need kernel math
emulation.  You can configure this in the main Makefile.

	If you have SCSI, you can configure the kernel so it contains support
*only* for the board(s) that you have and none of the others.  This saves a
few more bytes, and maintains a SCSI capability.

-Eric

--
Eric Youngdale
eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil
From: obz@sisd.kodak.com (Orest Zborowski COMP)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Xaw & shared libs
Date: 23 Jul 92 15:14:16 GMT
Organization: Printer Products Eastman Kodak
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

kk@cs.tu-berlin.de (Kolja Kaehler) writes:
>
>I'm currently playing with the athena widget stuff, and found something odd:
>
>I can't compile my applications or some simple demo program from the mit
>distribution with shared libraries (-static works fine); they segfault
>right away. What really confuses me: 
>I compiled some things like xtetris, gxditview with shared libs and they work
>like a charm ... any Ideas ?
>
>	Kolja
>
>-- 
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Kolja Kaehler                                            <kk@cs.tu-berlin.de>

there indeed is a bug with the shared libs (Xaw and Xt in particular) and
i am in the process of trying out the fixes hlu has proposed. if they work
then they will be released in x11v2.0. until that time, i'm afraid you will
have to use -static. note that this bug is subtle and affects everything
that uses Xaw (i.e. i've gotten xterm to dump core by doing a special rain
dance...)

zorst
-- 
zorst (orest zborowski)
[obz@raster.Kodak.COM]
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: negaard@aero.org (Eric Negaard)
Subject: Re: /dev/fd1 not detected
Organization: The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA
	<1992Jul28.090311.23301@bernina.ethz.ch>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 16:54:25 GMT

>>>>> On Tue, 28 Jul 1992 09:03:11 GMT, almesber@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch (Werner Almesberger) said:

almesber> In article <NEGAARD.92Jul27122123@fungus.aero.org> negaard@aero.org (Eric Negaard) writes:
> Linux doesn't seem to recognize my /dev/fd1 properly.
>
> It correctly identifies fd0 at boot time (fd0 is 1.2M), and the second
> (1.44M) drive works if I create /dev/PS1, it's only the auto-detecting
> driver that doesn't seem to work.

almesber> At boot time, the floppy driver prints whatever is configured in the
almesber> CMOS setup. When using the auto-detecting floppy devices, this
almesber> information determines what formats are tried.

almesber> So your CMOS setup is probably wrong. You should boot into the setup
almesber> program and define your B: as a 1.44MB drive.

Well, my CMOS is set up correctly (I just double-checked this morning).  Linux
must not be reading the CMOS values right on my machine.  The BIOS is:
"Phoenix 80486 ROM BIOS PLUS 0.10 G21-2"

			Eric Negaard
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
From: uphya001@odie.uni-bielefeld.de (Lars Koeller)
Subject: Mach2.6 device driver for Adaptec 1522 PIO SCSI Controller
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 92 07:32:48 GMT
Organization: Universitaet Bielefeld

Hello!

Has anybody written an device-driver for MACH2.6 which supports the
Adaptec 1522 controller with PIO data transfer? I have an 660MB EDSI harddisk
and want to use a SCSI streamer for backup. I can't use the 1542 DMA adapter
cause my ISA-bus like PC-clone has more than 16MB of memory.
Who can help me, it's very important! Thanks.
						Lars
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lars Koeller			    E-Mail: uphya001@odie.uni-bielefeld.de
Universitaet Bielefeld (Germany)	    uphya001@unibi.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de
Fakultaet fuer Physik / D0-231	    Phone:  +49 521-106-5375
Universitaetsstr. 25		    Fax:    +49 521-106-5244
4800 Bielefeld 1		    Telex:  932 362
From: kakarla@zach.fit.edu (Srikanth Kakarla)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: Re: regrading info on Mach
Summary: Re: Regarding info on Mach
Date: 27 Jul 92 16:59:32 GMT
Organization: Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne USA

Lately A lot of news readers have been requesting Info on mach.

If anybody needs any info let it be known that I have collected some info

I any body is interested I will mail them details please send e-mail to 

kakarla@zach.fit.edu. \

I thank all those who replied to my request for Info and express my deep 

gratitude to all of you who have answered my earlier questions ?.

The Indian.....

Mr.)  kakarla@zach.fit.edu

*************************************************************************
I know not what I do. But I know now what I should have done.
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
From: cyrus@virusdd.GUN.de (Ulrich Cyrus)
Subject: Re: NON-SCSI streamer support for MACH2.6
Organization: Virus Database Duesseldorf, FRG
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 02:15:28 GMT

uphya001@odie.uni-bielefeld.de (Lars Koeller) writes:


>Is there anybody who has written a device-driver for MACH2.6 which supports
>non-SCSI Tapes with a capacity of at least 150MB?
>The build in driver only runs with a 60MB Wangtek streamer, and a SCSI solution

I think the Wangtek driver you mentioned above is not only for 60MB-drives,
but for QIC-36 tape-controllers.
With QIC-36 you can use 150-meg tapes and larger sizes...

regards, Ulrich
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ulrich Cyrus   4000 Duesseldorf,FRG    0211/437 0325    cyrus@virusdd.GUN.de
From: adrian@niagara.ucs.ualberta.ca (Adrian Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: Mach port to multiple clients?
Date: 22 Jul 92 15:47:32 GMT
Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada

I'm trying to use a Mach port to connect a server process to multiple  
client processes on different machines. I'd like to connect the server  
through the network broadcast address and have the clients simply grab the  
packets as they appear. Is this possible with Mach, and if so, how? I can  
manage it with sockets, but I have to use UDP, and I don't want to do that  
because it's not particularly stable. The other problem is that according  
to the relevant SUN documentation the server process will have to be  
setuid root to use UDP with sockets.

The basic goal is to have the server send a datagram once and have  
multiple machines grab it.

I've looked through all the references I have access to, and can't seem to  
find anything. Can anyone suggest a solution?

--
Adrian Smith
University of Alberta NeXT Campus Consultant
adrian@niagara.ucs.ualberta.ca
Audix: 5482
From: dd2x+@andrew.cmu.edu (David Eugene Dwiggins)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: Need X11R5 Patches
Date: 28 Jul 92 00:39:21 GMT
Organization: Junior, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Does anyone have the second X11R5 patch that was released to this
bboard?  I tried the patches on vernam, but they
didn't include the changes made to Imake.tmpl and the other config files.

I'm using a 1200 baud connection so downloading the compiled version
isn't really an option.

Alternatively, is this bboard archived anywhere?

(The group of patches I'm referring to was the one that was basically
the same as the first group except for some minor config changes
including the use of /dev/mouse)

Thanks,

David
From: epstein@trwacs.fp.trw.com (Jeremy Epstein)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: Re: PEX for Mach
Summary: PEX won't work on Mach
Date: 31 Jul 92 13:17:19 GMT
Organization: TRW Systems Division, Fairfax VA

I'm replying only to the title, and not to the article itself.
The MIT distribution of PEX is dependent on the System V shared
memory interfaces, which are not part of Mach (or at least any
version of Mach I've seen).
-- 
Jeremy Epstein			Internet: epstein@trwacs.fp.trw.com
Trusted X Research Group	Voice: +1 703/803-4947
TRW Systems Division
Fairfax Virginia
From: stuart@TIVOLI.COM (Stuart Jarriel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: Help with Cthreads on HP-PA
Date: 31 Jul 92 15:48:29 GMT
Organization: Tivoli Systems, Inc

Has anyone done any work porting CMU threads to HP-PA?
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach,comp.sys.nsc.32k
From: ackley@banana.cis.ohio-state.edu (john james ackley)
Subject: Mach on PC532 <-SCSI-> NeXT ?  Thoughts?
Summary: IPC over SCSI between dissimilar architectures
Organization: The Ohio State University, Department of Computer and Information Science
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 09:47:45 GMT

Soon, I hope, the folks working with Mach on the PC532
will be able to make their work available to those without
UNIX source licences.  When that happy day comes, I'd like
to use the SCSI bus as an IPC channel between my PC532 and
my NeXT.  What do people think of this idea?  I already plan
to write the relevant drivers, but what schemes are there for
sharing compute power between dissimilar processors?
I could manually assign various tasks to each processor, but
that would take the fun out of it :-)

Well, there it is.  Lemme know what you think.

John Ackley <ackley@cis.ohio-state.edu>||<john@softspace.com>


Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
From: efk@ddsdx2.jhuapl.edu (Eileen Baust)
Subject: Use of timed or ntp in Mach 3.0
Keywords: timed
Organization: Johns Hopkins University
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 19:56:40 GMT

We need to synchronize 4 Dell PC's running
Mach 3.0 on a network. Has anyone tried to
to this ?
EIleen
From: Robert.Baron@cs.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: Re: non-CMU 386BSD Single Server procgress???
Date: 27 Jul 92 06:07:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Yes, distributed a server for use with the 0.0 version of
386BSD.  (Un)fortunately, about a week ago Jolitz released 386BSD
version 0.1  I have not have time yet
to pick up the binaries and see if our BSDSS works with
it.  When we are all caught up with 0.1, there will be a
post.
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
From: mike@vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at (Michael Gschwind)
Subject: Re: c compiler for machten
Organization: Vienna University of Technology
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 23:31:17 GMT

In article <1992Jul14.200620.5698@uwm.edu> hardiman@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul V Hardiman) writes:

   >I understand that someone has done a port of gcc (or some c compiler) to
   >MachTen for the mac.  Is this so, and if yes, where can it be found?

   Tenon, the producers of MachTen, supply a port of gcc with their
   optional (i.e. extra cost) development system for MachTen.  The
   development system also includes, lex, yacc, make, etc.  You can
   get it from Tenon for $395, and from at least one mail order house
   for somewhat less.

   I don't know of any non-commercial ports of gcc to MachTen.

Since gcc is copy-;efted, this IS a non-commercial port. The 
copyright notice off gcc basically says that (my wards) "if you 
can get your hands on a copy of the port, there is nothing Tenon (or 
anybody else) can do to prevent you from using it) - every user is 
ALSO free to re-distribute the port they got from Tenon, since the gcc
copyright (a.k.a. copy-left) notice also explicitly forbids them
to forbid you to redistribute their port of gcc - so anybody who has
it is free to let you get a copy of it via ftp or even put it
in an ano ftp server

(Does not apply to the non-GNU parts of their development package,
but does apply to all other GNU-based stuff)

Apart from all that, the FSF - the holders of the copyright on gcc
and other GNU stuff - urge a boycott of Apple and Apple's products,
because of their anti-social behaviour, namely look&feel
copyright suits.

mike
--

Michael Gschwind, Dept. of VLSI-Design, Vienna University of Technology
mike@vlsivie.tuwien.ac.at	1-2-3-4 kick the lawsuits out the door 
mike@vlsivie.uucp		5-6-7-8 innovate don't litigate         
e182202@awituw01.bitnet		9-A-B-C interfaces should be free
Voice: (++43).1.58801 8144	D-E-F-O look and feel has got to go!
Fax:   (++43).1.569697
From: dri@gl.pitt.edu (Paul)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: non-CMU 386BSD Single Server procgress???
Date: 26 Jul 92 06:01:45 GMT
Distribution: usa

A while back I saw a notice for a 386BSD Single Server under Mach 3.0
that was in beta and availiable to anyone with Mach 3.0 presently.  The
notice also stated that the release was availiable only via SUP, but
would be made availiable via FTP soon, when it was more stable.

I am inquiring 1) If there is a mailing list that is active on this
project and the proceedure to be added; and 2) Is there a time estimate
of when the non-CMU build environment of this will be availiable via
anonymous FTP.  I am speaking only for myself but I have a feeling that
many people on the NET would love to have the Mach 3.0 micro-kernel
running ANY operating system that is in any state of beta testing.

I personally do not have an AT&T source license (and don't plan on
getting one soon, unless I win the state lottery ;) but I very much
would like to work with Mach 3.0.  I know Mt Xinu has a port availiable
but it is not compatible (hard disk format wise) with any recent or
future updates to the micro-kernel itself.

CMU (at least I think that they are involved) would be doing a great
service to the furtherance of the acceptance (and eventual utilization)
of the Mach micro-kernel.

Please reply in the mach newgroup so others can use the info too.
Thanks in advance.

dri@apollo.gl.pitt.edu
__
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
From: mark@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark Bamberg)
Subject: Looking for supported port of Mach for Motorala MVME-167
Originator: mark@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 20:31:59 GMT

We are searching for a vendor who has a port of Mach for the Motorola MVME-167
board.

If anyone has any information, especially names or number for vendors,
we would appreciate it.

Thanks
Mark

mark@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
From: csci361@tacky.cs.olemiss.edu (Computer Networks)
Subject: PEX for Mach
Originator: csci361@tacky.cs.olemiss.edu
Organization: University of Mississippi
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 15:44:22 GMT
From: suna@brains.cs.uec.ac.jp (Hideki Sunahara)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: Re: Mach references...
Date: 23 Jul 92 08:06:32 GMT
	<1992Jul22.111302.22440@tsl.cl.nec.co.jp>
Organization: Department of Computer Science, The University of
	Electro-Communications
In-reply-to: ishii@tsl.cl.nec.co.jp's message of 22 Jul 92 11:13:02 GMT


In article <1992Jul22.111302.22440@tsl.cl.nec.co.jp> ishii@tsl.cl.nec.co.jp (Hidehiro Ishii) writes:

   >>I am looking for information about microkernels (characteristics, design,
   >>trends, etc), specially about Mach and OSF/1. Does anybody has any references
   >>/bibliography?

     In response to an article of Mr. (Ms?) Srikanth Kakarla
   (kakarla@zach.fit.edu) in this newsgroup, Ms. Deborah Scherrer
   (scherrer@mtxinu.COM) wrote that:

   In article <Brp9Kt.82x@watserv1.waterloo.edu> ralanis@grand.waterloo.edu (Ramon Alanis) writes:

   >>mt Xinu maintains a bibliography of Mach-related papers.  It's available
   >>electronically or on paper.   If you, or anyone else, would like a copy,
   >>contact:   jamie@mtxinu.com

     I contacted Ms. Jamie Marks, and she gave me a document named "Mach
   Bibliography" written in postscript by e-mail.

Everyone can pick up "Mach Bibliography" by anonymous ftp from
mach.cs.cmu.edu. You need some special technique to pick up it since
CMU is using AFS.

% ftp mach.cs.cmu.edu
Connected to ERNST.MACH.CS.CMU.EDU.
220 ERNST.MACH.CS.CMU.EDU FTP server (Version 4.105 of 10-Jul-90
12:07) ready.
Name (mach.cs.cmu.edu:suna): anonymous
331 Guest login ok, send username@node as password.
Password: user@node
230-Filenames can not begin with "/.." .
230-Other than that, everything is ok.
230 User anon logged in.
ftp> cd /afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/mach/public/doc
250 Directory path set to /afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/mach/public/doc.
ftp> 

mach_bib.doc is "Mach Bibliography" in text. mach_bib.ps is in
PostScript. You can also find interesting documents and papers in this
directory.
/afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/mach/public/doc/mach3/kernel_principles.ps is
suitable for you. This document describes Kernel Structure and Design
of Mach 3.0.

     Anyway, according to it, there seems to be some papers which inform
   you what you want.  One of them is:

	   Richard F. Rashid
	   "Threads of a new system"
	   Unix Review, 4(8), August 1986

   which provides an overview of the development of Mach.
This document is too old, since this is for Mach 2.0.

You can also refer the proceedings for following workshops and
symposium.

Oct. 1990 USENIX Mach Workshop
Nov. 1991 USENIX 2nd Mach Symposium
Apr. 1992 USENIX Workshop on Micro-Kernels and Other Kernel
		Architectures.

Maybe, last one is interested for you. This proceedings include
overview of Mach, Amoeba, Chorus, Plan 9, Windows/NT.



--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
$@EE5$DL?.Bg3X>pJs9)3X2J(J $@JBNs(J/$@J,;6(J$@=hM}8&5f<<(J| $@:=86(J  $@=(<y(J
Parallel and Distributed Processing Lab.  | Hideki Sunahara
Department of Computer Science            |
The University of Electro-Communications  | E-mail: suna@cs.uec.ac.jp
From: adrian@niagara.ucs.ualberta.ca (Adrian Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: Re: Can I get the source for Mach as hacked by NeXT?
Date: 22 Jul 92 15:40:50 GMT
Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada

In article <1992Jul21.145117.275@IRO.UMontreal.CA> hugo@IRO.UMontreal.CA  
(Hugo Desrosiers) writes:

> Here is what gets out of my NeXT's (running beta version of NS 3.0):
> Mach kernel version:
>          NeXT Mach 3.0: Wed Apr  1 17:44:27 PST 1992;  
root(kodak):mk-127.5.1/BUILD/RELEASE_M68K
> 
> Kernel configured for a single processor only.
> 1 processor is physically available.
> Processor type: MC680x0 (68040)
> Processor active: 0
> Primary memory available: 16.00 megabytes.
> Default processor set: 50 tasks, 77 threads, 1 processors
> Load average: 0.00, Mach factor: 0.99
> 
> ('hope this is not going to make someone mad at me...)
> 
> 					Hugo

Sorry Hugo, but this is an in-house version number from NeXT. NeXTSTEP 3.0  
is still running Mach 2.5. NeXT has publicly stated they will not move to  
Mach 3.0 for their newest OS...

---
Adrian Smith
University of Alberta NeXT Campus Consultant
adrian@niagara.ucs.ualberta.ca
Audix: 5482
 
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
From: briana@sharebase.com (Brian G. Anderson </>)
Subject: How does one debug the Unix server?
Organization: ShareBase Corporation
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 92 16:14:47 GMT

Hi,
	Can someone give me a quick description of how one would debug
the Unix emulator.  I've debugged the microkernel (the in-kernel debugger
is great) with no problem.  However, when I used gdb to attach the MID
of the server, the entire system stopped (which make sense since gdb
probably relies on unix services).  I am trying to debug a PPP terminal
discipline in the server.  Right now I'm using printf, but this is a
major pain.   Any help would be appreciated.  Thanks,

Brian G. Anderson          -      o    Internet: briana@sharebase.com
NCR/Sharebase             -    _ /-_      Voice: (510) 548-3211
1919 Addison St.         -    (_)>(_)
Berkeley, CA 94704      -----------------------------------------------------


-- 
Brian G. Anderson          -      o    Internet: briana@sharebase.com
NCR/Sharebase             -    _ /-_      Voice: (510) 548-3211
1919 Addison St.         -    (_)>(_)
Berkeley, CA 94704      -----------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach,comp.unix.aux
From: charlesa@niwot.scd.ucar.edu (Charles Albrecht)
Subject: A/UX 3.0 vs MachTen 2.0
Keywords: machten, aux, mac, unix
Organization: Scientific Computing Divison/NCAR Boulder, CO
Distribution: world, usa
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 13:59:18 GMT

Has anyone had any experience with either of these products, or made some
sort of comparison?  Each seems to have its own merits, but are there any
serious problems with one or the other? Kudos? Flames?

(A/UX and MachTen are UNIX implementations for the Macintosh.)
{A/UX is a System V - BSD hybrid, requires 68020 w/PMMU (or030/040)
 (32 bit mode) & special disk formatting.  It runs Mac OS as a UNIX process.
 MachTen is BSD (Carnegie Mellon Mach kernel), runs on 68000 - 040, using
 native mac file system.  It runs as a Mac application.}

Email or post replies - will summarize if helpful.

Charles


Charles Albrecht                        "Nonsense, they only say you can't
charlesa@ncar.ucar.edu                   escape from The Fire Swamp becuase
303/497-1828                             no one ever has."
                                          - Westley, The Dread Pirate Roberts

NCAR - Scientific Computing Division * P.O. Box 3000 * Boulder, Colorado  80307

The opinions you are about to have read are ficticious...
        ...any similarity to opinions living or dead is purely coincidental.
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
From: root@sapsan.msk.su (0000-Admin(0000))
Subject: Some questions to Mach's Hackers!
Reply-To: root@sapsan.msk.su
Organization: Research & Production Centre SAPSAN
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 11:15:52 +0300

I want begin to learn about Mach. Do somebody can talk me what Mach is?
Where I can get the source code of the Mach and appropriate docs?
What relation is between Mach and Unix? Has anybody speak up Mach's creation
and it's development? What is the last Mach's version?
Is it possible to get the source code for the Mach running on my
Mc68030 VME Machine?

           Thanks in advance.
           Dmitry W. Doronin

E-Mail:  root@sapsan.msk.su


Newsgroups: comp.os.mach