HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: system@precipice.chi.il.us (Vikki Welch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
Subject: elm/smail/cnews help - THANKS!
Summary: elm and smail mostly working !
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 08:01:38 CST
Organization: Welch Research, McHenry IL, USA

Hi Again,

  To all those that responded to my request for help in getting
those items compiled and running a very special thanks !  Both
elm and smail are up and running although I am still working at
getting them properly configured.

  I was surprised at the number of responses that were so
consistant - I don't quite feel so bad about not figuring it out
by myself <grin>.

  The first "live" test appears to have failed.  Not sure why
yet, but I suspect that it has to with an incorrect smarthost
setup and maybe something to do with carbon copies (cc:) in elm.
More likely the cc in elm.  I sent a message to a local site cc's
to vikki at this system from dixie.  The message was passed to
the designated smart host and then back to vikki@precipice and as
near as I can tell at this time, it didn't make it to the other
local site.  It did look like the primary addressee AND the cc
both ended up on the TO line, but I need to check that as this
systems (precipice) mail reader doesn't do CCs.

  The point is that they did get made and are up and working, if
not quite properly configured yet.  Progress !  Maybe dixie will
be fully operational by the end of the year !

  Thanks again to all !  Merry Yule !

Take care, Vikki.

P.S.  Someone asked why I post as "system" here.  Well, I try to
keep operationally oriented stuff seperate from personal mail as
there is so much of both <grin>.  Take care, Vikki.
==============================================================================
* Vikki Welch, Sysadmin (vikki@precipice.chi.il.us) WV9K/NNN0AEE/NNN0GAP TWO *
* Disclaimer standard,  You mean someone actually *cares* about my opinions? *
*                   Beware of Quantum ducks - Quark, Quark                   *
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Xref: sparky comp.unix.xenix.misc:274 general:391
From: rick@ee.uwm.edu (Rick Miller, Linux Device Registrar)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc,general
Subject: Does anyone remember the Tandy 6000?
Followup-To: comp.unix.xenix.misc
Date: 15 Dec 1992 05:39:39 GMT
Organization: Just me.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.2.33
Summary: I've got the hardware...  I'm looking for the doc's and software.
Keywords: old, Tandy, 6000

The school that my church supports has a few Tandy 6000's sitting in the
cellar gathering dust...  I understand that they're old machines (8086's?)
and that they're *not* IBM-PC compatible... but the fellow at Tandy said
they're supposed to run Xenix!

These things each have an 8-inch floppy drive (yes, they're *that* old) and
a <whopping> 15 Megabyte hard drive.  I've got the hardware, but no manuals
and no software...  Can anyone out there point me to some source for doc's
and disks for these things?  I'd *love* to be able to put them to use for
*anything* (beyond being really ugly footstools).

I realize this request may be rather obscure, so I've added it to my .sig
in hopes that some day, somehow, someone will answer... (Like SETI, cxu ne?)

Rick Miller   <rick@ee.uwm.edu> | <rick@discus.mil.wi.us>   Ricxjo Muelisto
Occupation:  Husband, Father, WEPCo. WAN Mgr., Discus Sys0p, and  Linux fan

P.S.:  Will someone who knows anything about the old "Tandy 6000" *please*
	e-mail me?  I've got the hardware, but no manuals and no diskettes.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
From: peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva)
Subject: Re: Does anyone remember the Tandy 6000?
Keywords: old, Tandy, 6000
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 01:03:12 GMT

In article <1gjr2rINNnhe@uwm.edu> rick@ee.uwm.edu (Rick Miller, Linux Device Registrar) writes:
> The school that my church supports has a few Tandy 6000's sitting in the
> cellar gathering dust...  I understand that they're old machines (8086's?)
> and that they're *not* IBM-PC compatible... but the fellow at Tandy said
> they're supposed to run Xenix!

yes, at one point most of the installed base of UNIX systems, by number, were
Tandy 6000s and Model 16s running Xenix. They use the 68000 and a primitive
custom MMU, from what I can recall.

Why don't you call Tandy for info? Directory assistance, Fort Worth, TX.
-- 
%Peter da Silva/77487-5012 USA/+1 713 274 5180/Have you hugged your wolf today?
/L{lineto}def/C{curveto}def/F{0 562 moveto 180 576 324 648 396 736 C 432 736 L
482 670 518 634 612 612 C}def/G{setgray}def .75 G F 612 792 L 0 792 L fill 1 G
324 720 24 0 360 arc fill 0 G 3 setlinewidth F stroke showpage % "Peerless"
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
From: ddkilzer@iastate.edu (David D Kilzer)
Subject: UUCP program for MS-DOS to Xenix
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 19:42:50 GMT

I'm looking for a program (preferably public domain) that uucp's files
from an MS-DOS host to a Xenix machine (running SCO Xenix 3.2.4).  The
files would only have to go one-way (MS-DOS to Xenix), but the program
MUST be able to log into a Xenix system and transmit files to it (or
else I would have posted this to more than one newsgroup :).

The DOS machine is running DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.0, BTW.

If you are using such a program or know of one that works, please let me
know.  Thanks!

Dave
-- 
David D. Kilzer               \                ST:TNG _Relics_
ddkilzer@iastate.edu          /       Capt. Montgomery Scott ("Scotty")
Computer Engineer 3rd Class   \   "I may be a captain by rank, but I never
Iowa State University, Ames   /    wanted to be anything but an engineer."
From: rick@ee.uwm.edu (Rick Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
Subject: Re: Does anyone remember the Tandy 6000?
Date: 17 Dec 1992 06:45:43 GMT
Organization: Just me.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.2.33
Summary: Julian's just a clueless jerk.
Keywords: old, Tandy, 6000

In <suwandi.724558019@sfu.ca> Julian (see ref. art.) wrote:
>Hmm... let me refer to my prehistoric guide to computers... <flip, flip> no, no,
>no, hmm.. it seems that it's been extinct for quite a while..
>
>Anyway, I have doubts about it running Xenix, if it makes you feel better.. :)


It would seem, Julian, that you're not only useless... you're WRONG too!

As it happens, the Tandy 6000 was the latest thing before Tandy/Radio-Shack
decided to go with the i80x86 (IBM-PC) stuff.  It runs a Motorolo 68000
processor (yes, the same one that's in the Amiga and the Macintosh), *and*
a Z80b for communications... And at 8 MHz, this setup ain't too bad.

It also happens that for quite some time this machine was the *leading*
platform (in numbers), not only for MicroSoft Xenix, but for *any* UNIX!

Your posting was *worse* than useless.  It was an annoyance, and could have
been a discouragement if I hadn't (obviously) had plenty of well-informed
responses already.  If I were to re-post your article to "comp.sys.tandy",
you'd get a solid flaming for your ignorance and for the flippant way you
so casually tried to crush my hopes of helping out some school-kids.

So keep your 'mouth' shut unless you know what you're talking about.
There are far too many Usenet readers who know enough to call your bluff.
(...and just as many ways to convince your system administrator that you
 really shouldn't have Usenet access anyway...)

Rick Miller   <rick@ee.uwm.edu> | <rick@discus.mil.wi.us>   Ricxjo Muelisto
Occupation:  Husband, Father, WEPCo. WAN Mgr., Discus Sys0p, and  Linux fan
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
From: jmh@coyote.datalog.com (John Hughes)
Subject: Re: UUCP program for MS-DOS to Xenix
Organization: That's a dirty word around here...
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 19:35:55 GMT

In article <Bz7qrF.2vD@news.iastate.edu> ddkilzer@iastate.edu (David D Kilzer) writes:
>I'm looking for a program (preferably public domain) that uucp's files
>from an MS-DOS host to a Xenix machine (running SCO Xenix 3.2.4).  The
>files would only have to go one-way (MS-DOS to Xenix), but the program
>MUST be able to log into a Xenix system and transmit files to it (or
>else I would have posted this to more than one newsgroup :).
>
>The DOS machine is running DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.0, BTW.
>
>If you are using such a program or know of one that works, please let me
>know.  Thanks!

I use UUPC from Kendra Wonderworks to connect a LAN server running DOS to
both my local Xenix machines (a Tandy 6000 and an AT clone running IBM
Xenix 2.0) with hardwire connections and a kindly internet access point 
via modem. It's small, easy to set up, it works, and it comes will full
sources. You can get it from Bix, Compuserve, and wuarchive.wustl.edu
or SIMTEL20. Sub-version "q" supports com1 through 4.

There are also some other less functional uucp implementations for the PC
running around, but I can't vouch for any of them.

-- 
==============================================================================
|    John M. Hughes      P.O. Box 43305      Tucson   AZ     85733     USA   |
|         ......... Insert _your_ favorite witty quote here .........        |
| jmh%cerberus.uucp@noao.edu  ...noao!cerberus!jmh  jmh@moondog.datalog.com  |
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
From: jerbo@mwblind (Jeremy Bettis)
Subject: Re: UUCP program for MS-DOS to Xenix
Organization: Midwest Venetian Blind
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 23:43:08 GMT

>In <Bz7qrF.2vD@news.iastate.edu> ddkilzer@iastate.edu (David D Kilzer) writes:

>:I'm looking for a program (preferably public domain) that uucp's files
>:from an MS-DOS host to a Xenix machine (running SCO Xenix 3.2.4).  The
>:files would only have to go one-way (MS-DOS to Xenix), but the program
>:MUST be able to log into a Xenix system and transmit files to it (or
>:else I would have posted this to more than one newsgroup :).

>:The DOS machine is running DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.0, BTW.

>:If you are using such a program or know of one that works, please let me
>:know.  Thanks!

UUPC/Extended works well...  I am using v1.11v to login and talk to a SCO
Xenix 2.3.3 system running HDB.  It is on ftp sites all over the place, and
I understand v1.11x is due to be released in a week or two.

-- 
          ---> Jerbo Jehoshaphat <---         -------> Jeremy Bettis <-------
INTERNET: jbettis@cse.unl.edu            )(   "People who stand in the middle
UUCP:   ..mmedia!mwblind!jerbo         )(**)(  of the road are often hit by
          	-*-                      )(    passing cars."    -*-
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
From: apl@world.std.com (Anthony P Lawrence)
Subject: Re: Does anyone remember the Tandy 6000?
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:48:06 GMT

suwandi@fraser.sfu.ca (Julian Suwandi) writes:
: Hmm... let me refer to my prehistoric guide to computers... <flip, flip> no, 
: no, no, hmm.. it seems that it's been extinct for quite a while..
: 
Flippant response.

Actually, there are still people running these things.  They are
about as fast as an 8MHZ 286, and about as reliable as the same thing
with a speed-up crystal :-)

Extinct? Not quite yet.  But many of us are working toward that end :-)

: Anyway, I have doubts about it running Xenix, if it makes you feel better.. :)
: -- 

You have doubts?  Well, that settles it.

You'd probably doubt that there was an 8086 version of Xenix too, but
there was.

Just a while ago Tandy sold off the last of it's inventory and they
ended up in Home Shopping Club (or whatever) and were being peddled
(with Xenix!) as multi-user machines.

:     ********************** KEEP CHRIST IN CHRISTMAS *********************

Keep Christ to yourself.


		Tony   apl@world.std.com

Lawrence & Clark, Inc		(617) 762-0707	(206) 323-2864
Xenix/Unix support,etc 	 	 Boston		 Seattle
From: josephs@msen.com (Joseph Stroup)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
Subject: Tandy 6000
Date: 21 Dec 92 01:23:53 GMT
Organization: Msen, Inc. -- Ann Arbor, Michigan
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.msen.com


 The Tandy 6000 ran Xenix. It was slow, did not run multi-user
 well. Great idea just a bit before its time. I had 3 of them.
 Now they are now worth the electrical power to play with. If
 you did not know what you could do with them before, I can't tell
 you now. Most of this stuff is old and unless you have a very specific
 job for them, they are just junk. Good luck happy holidays.
-- 
Joseph Stroup          | Still trying to work
                       | and Play well with Others.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
From: goose@ais.org (Christopher L. Goosman)
Subject: Re: Does anyone remember the Tandy 6000?
Keywords: old, Tandy, 6000
Organization: UMCC
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 12:34:48 GMT

suwandi@fraser.sfu.ca (Julian Suwandi) writes:
>Hmm... let me refer to my prehistoric guide to computers... <flip, flip> no, no
>no, hmm.. it seems that it's been extinct for quite a while..
>Anyway, I have doubts about it running Xenix, if it makes you feel better.. :)

No, it does. I've seen it! ;-)


-- 
Christopher L. Goosman                                   goose@irie.ais.org
Ann Arbor, MI USA                     University of Michigan Computing Club
     "The fools only laugh 'cause they envy you." -- Paul Weller, 1977
"You remember when?Yeah,so do I.They call those the Salad Days"Minor Threat
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
From: bill@Celestial.COM (Bill Campbell)
Subject: Re: UUCP program for MS-DOS to Xenix
Organization: Celestial Software, Mercer Island, WA
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 01:48:25 GMT

In <Bz7qrF.2vD@news.iastate.edu> ddkilzer@iastate.edu (David D Kilzer) writes:

:I'm looking for a program (preferably public domain) that uucp's files
:from an MS-DOS host to a Xenix machine (running SCO Xenix 3.2.4).  The

Are you sure that isn't Xenix 2.3.4?  The current SCO UNIX is 3.2v4.

:files would only have to go one-way (MS-DOS to Xenix), but the program
:MUST be able to log into a Xenix system and transmit files to it (or
:else I would have posted this to more than one newsgroup :).

:The DOS machine is running DOS 5.0 and Windows 3.0, BTW.

:If you are using such a program or know of one that works, please let me
:know.  Thanks!

If your only goal is to transmit files, you might want to use
MS-kermit and ckermit on the Xenix.

If you really want uucp, I would highly recommend the MKS
Toolkit.  This isn't free (somewhere around $250), but it gives
you many UNIX utilities for DOS, the Korn Shell, and uucp.  I
can't use DOS without it :-).

Bill
-- 
INTERNET:  bill@Celestial.COM   Bill Campbell; Celestial Software
UUCP:   ...!thebes!camco!bill   6641 East Mercer Way
             uunet!camco!bill   Mercer Island, WA 98040; (206) 947-5591
SPEED COSTS MONEY -- HOW FAST DO YOU WANT TO GO?
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
From: suwandi@fraser.sfu.ca (Julian Suwandi)
Subject: Re: Does anyone remember the Tandy 6000?
Keywords: old, Tandy, 6000
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 02:06:59 GMT

Hmm... let me refer to my prehistoric guide to computers... <flip, flip> no, no,
no, hmm.. it seems that it's been extinct for quite a while..

Anyway, I have doubts about it running Xenix, if it makes you feel better.. :)
-- 
    ********************** KEEP CHRIST IN CHRISTMAS *********************
      Julian Suwandi        |  Quotes / Unquote of the week
         643-0827           |      Insanity is hereditary... 
      suwandi@sfu.ca        |      You get it from your kids.
From: mjo@iao.ford.com (Mike O'Connor)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
Subject: Re: Does anyone remember the Tandy 6000?
Date: 15 Dec 1992 15:47:13 GMT
Organization: Not an official spokesperson for Ford Motor Company
Reply-To: "Mike O'Connor" <mjo@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost

In article <1gjs3oINNnj2@uwm.edu> rick@ee.uwm.edu (Rick Miller, Linux
Device Registrar) writes:

:and that they're *not* IBM-PC compatible... but the fellow at Tandy said
:they're supposed to run Xenix!
:
:These things each have an 8-inch floppy drive (yes, they're *that* old) and
:a <whopping> 15 Megabyte hard drive.  I've got the hardware, but no manuals
:and no software...  Can anyone out there point me to some source for doc's
:and disks for these things?  I'd *love* to be able to put them to use for
:*anything* (beyond being really ugly footstools).

You *should* be able to get info on where to get more information from
your local Radio Shack manager.  Have him/her punt a request over to
their divisional headquarters. 

						...Mike

-- 
 Michael J. O'Connor           |  Internet:  mjo@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com
 Ford Motor Company, OPEO      |  UUCP:      ...!{backbone}!fmsrl7!mjo
 20000 Rotunda, Bldg. 1-3001   |  Phone:     +1 (313) 248-1260
 Dearborn, MI  48121           |  Fax:       +1 (313) 323-6277
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.misc
From: bedaj00@DMI.USherb.CA (JOEL BEDARD)
Subject: Problem with my drive...
Organization: Universite de Sherbrooke -- Dept. d'Informatique
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 00:53:25 GMT


Hi!
   Can some explain me how to restore a file that i erase?

I lost /dev/fd0135ds15.

Thank all,
  
      Joel

-- 
Joel Bedard       E-Mail :  bedaj00@dmi.usherb.ca

Universite de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
From: neese@adaptx1.UUCP (Roy Neese)
Subject: Re: OUT OF INODES - fsck/filesystem trouble
Organization: Adaptec Inc., Texas
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 1992 20:02:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov30.230842.810@oneb.almanac.bc.ca> kmcvay@oneb.almanac.bc.ca (Ken Mcvay) writes:
> System: SCO XENIX 2.3.2 GT 
> 
> I have a recurring problem which cannot be eliminated without re-installing
> the o/s, which I am loath to do, since I'd have to back up 110 megs to
> floppies :-(
> 
> There are two bad sectors on the SCSI disk which I cannot add to the (empty)
> badtrk table, either because I didn't leave room for it at installation, or
> because the SCSI support is broken with 2.3.2 GT - in any event, I can't
> readily get rid of them, and re-installation isn't a viable option at the
> moment.
> 
> When XENIX tries to write to one of the bad sectors (it is always the same
> one, 2162, which causes this problem, as far as I've noticed to date), and
> an error message is produced, the inodes used percentage always jumps to
> 100% - from what it actually is, i.e. 20-30% on average.

I don't what kind of disk drive it is, but you might try this, if you
have a 154x host adapter;  Get a hold of SCSICNTL.EXE and see if the
drive will accept the "Automatic Write Reallocation" setting under the
error recovery page option.  If the drive will accept this option, set
it and reboot the system.  The next time a write to the bad sector occurs,
the driver *should* automatically map it out without the OS knowing about
it.
---

			Roy Neese
			Adaptec Senior UNIX/SCSI Software Engineer
			UUCP:	convex!egsner!adaptex!neese
			Inet:	neese%adaptex@cirr.com
From: sl@wimsey.bc.ca (Stuart Lynne)
Subject: Re: Revisited: Anomaly
Organization: BC News and Mail
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 00:25:32 GMT

In article <516@yonder.UUCP> michael@yonder.UUCP (Michael E. Haws) writes:
>
>In article <1992Dec10.003057.841@mcs.anl.gov>, cbaker@woody.dep.anl.gov (Christo pher Baker) writes:
>>
>> >>I noticed that everyone refered to anomaly as the best for us
>> >>Xenix users.  I tried anonymous ftp, dial up, and the mail server

>I too have had zero luck trying anonymous ftp to anomaly over the past few
>days, trying all hours of the day.  My internet connection gets me to any
>other site with no problems, but not so with anomaly.  Perhaps anomaly

Speaking of slow has anyone out there had any troubles or success getting
stuff off our ftp server? I've done a couple of things to try and improve
service. But it's always hard to tell what it looks like from the outside.

So if you have ftp'd something from wimsey.bc.ca/wimey.com in the last two
weeks or so I'd like to know if it worked ok for you. I do know we average
about 50+ ftp connections a day. I guess if there where problems I'd still
be hearing about it. Hopefully no news (not the network type) is good news.


-- 
Stuart Lynne <sl@wimsey.com> ......................... UNIX Facsimile Software
Wimsey Information Technologies ................... moderator biz.sco.binaries
uucp login:nuucp passwd:nuucp .................... ftp.wimsey.com:~ftp/ls-lR.Z
PD Software for SCO UNIX .................... ftp.wimsey.com:~ftp/pub/wimseypd
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
From: daw@vivanet.com (David A. Wolf)
Subject: Re: Hardware support HORROR story!
Organization: VIVATRON Corporation 
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 21:51:12 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Summary: Another PC expert stricks again

In article <BzGEu2.1yn@world.std.com> apl@world.std.com (Anthony P Lawrence) writes:
>bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion) writes:
>: What the hell has happened to support in this country anyway?
>: 
>: Has anybody else had anything like this happen to them, or we
>: just unusually lucky :-(.
>: 
>Oh, how about breaking a motherboard while installing a multiport
>card?  Breaking as in knocking chips right off?
>
[ stuff deleted ]
>Here's the problem, the reason, and the explanation:  there is a
>limited supply of intelligence.  The number of computers needing
>service has now exceeded the number of intelligent people
>available.  So fools are sent to do service.
>
>		Tony   apl@world.std.com
>
>Lawrence & Clark, Inc		(617) 762-0707	(206) 323-2864
>Xenix/Unix support,etc 	 	 Boston		 Seattle

MY PERSONAL FAVORITE...
Got a call from a company (sco referred them to me) that needed
their XENIX re-installed.  Apparently they were offered this
great PC TUNE-UP ($49.95) by a local computer retailer.  They came in a
ran some PC diags, re-fragmentation software, DOS Diags etc.
The tech left telling the customer their system is in great shape!
OF COURSE XENIX NOW WAS GONE!!    

David A. Wolf                               Toll: 716-272-0820
VIVATRON Corporation                        Free: 800-836-UNIX
Rochester, New York, USA                     Fax: 716-272-7627
SCO Advanced Product Center                email: daw@vivanet.com
*******************************************************************
From: gryphon@openage.openage.com (The Golden Gryphon)
Subject: Re: Can't I have two floppy drives in SCO UNIX?
Organization: Open Age, Inc.
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:25:45 GMT

TAMGC@CUNYVM.BITNET writes:

>I have a DELL PC running under SCO Unix, with 31/4 and 51/2' drives.
>I have always been using the 31/4' drive so far, and did not even try
>the 51/2' one. But recently I have realized that,that drive is not even
>defined in the kernel, and I could not find a way to install an additional
>diskette drive.

>Does anybody have an idea about how to do this?

>Thanks..

>Tamer Avcilar

>(I have SCO UNIX 3.2.4)

You probably haven't defined it in the DELL setup utility.

-- 
The Golden Gryphon 				gryphon@openage.COM
"Mad Scientists seeks mindless brawny assistants, good pay, quiet location."
"They're not ghosts,  they're metaphysically challenged." - Me
Openage - The Premier SCO UNIX integrator in the Washington D.C. area
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
From: crouland@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (DES Cracker)
Subject: DTC SCSI Host Adaptor Problems
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 13:49:56 GMT


Has anyone had any luck using the DTC SCSI HOST Adaptor with SCO Unix
3.2.4?? I am having a hard time, the OS will not recognize it on
install.

Is there an SLS or anything?
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco