HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4beta PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 1832
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 09:46:32 CDT
From:         Cleve Graves <cvg@DBAIX.OC.COM>
Subject:      Re: ptfs and such via ftp
X-To:         IBMTCP-L@pucc.Princeton.EDU
              at Jul 24, 92 10:31:16 am

I thought this was an improper commercial use of the Internet?  We had talked
of doing this often and concluded that it wasn't proper.  Is it OK to do this
sort of thing?

According to gettes@PRINCETON.EDU
>
>It would appear that aix attempted to put up fixes via anonymous
>ftp. Wouldn't it be nice if this could be done for the FAL product?
>This would eliminate a lot of waste of money for mailing tapes, it
>would save the plastic for the mailing envelope and the tape itself.
>It would seem most practical and financially beneficial to IBM to
>offer this (free!) to the customers of the FAL/HAL products.
>
>A pipe dream... I know.
>
>/mrg
>
>------- Forwarded Message
>
>Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 09:22:06 EDT
>Reply-To: IBM AIX Discussion List <AIX-L@pucc>
>Sender: IBM AIX Discussion List <AIX-L@pucc>
>From: David Joyner <nsysdbj@STRAYLIGHT.ACS.NCSU.EDU>
>Subject:      Re: address of IBM ftp server for fixes, etc.
>X-To:         AIX-L%PUCC.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu
>To: "Michael R. Gettes" <GETTES@pucc>
>In-Reply-To:  <9207241313.AA17991@acsprod1.acs.ncsu.edu>; from "Mike Ellwood"
>              at Jul 24, 92 2:07 pm
>
>Mike Ellwood wrote:
>>
>>I'm sure I've seen this posted, but have lost all record of it, very
>>foolishly. Can anyone help? Thanks.
>>Mike Ellwood (mwe@ib.rl.ac.uk)
>>
>
>software.watson.ibm.com.
>
>Don't expect to much...
>
>- --
>David Joyner (david_joyner@ncsu.edu)
>Unix Systems Programmer                            | Phone: (919) 515-2794  |
>NCSU Administrative Computing Services             | FAX:   (919) 515-3787  |
>
>------- End of Forwarded Message
>


--
Thanks,                                 internet-mail id cvg@oc.com
Cleve Graves
Technical Marketing
OpenConnect Systems, Inc.
2033 Chennault Dr.
Carrollton, Texas 75006  (Dallas)      (214) 308-0416   FAX (214) 490-4052
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 27 Jul 1992 11:22:42 EDT
From:         Jacob Krasikov <KRASIK@YKTVMV.BITNET>
Subject:      Remove Id from IBM TCP/IP list

Please, remove my Id from the IBMTCP-L list. Thanks. -Jacob
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 11:53:00 PDT
From:         310 Denis DeLaRoca 825-4580 <CSP1DWD@UCLAMVS.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: MVS TCP/IP operator interface

>  How do MVS shops allow the operators to do some things (like start
>  and stop devices) without allowing them to also re-configure TCP/IP?
>  If you just let them use OBEYFILE without restrictions, they could ely
>  change things that don't need changing.
>
>  I would like to be able to allow the operators to only issue OBEYFIL
>  to stop and start devices.  Any suggestions?

And I'd like a flavor of the OBEYFILE privilige that would allow
use of the raw IP services (for utilities like ping and traceroute).
I don't know if v2.2 of TCPIP improves in this area but yes, the
OBEYFILE privilige is too broad and kind of useless right now, it's
all or nothing!

-- Denis
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: SUNY at Stony Brook NY 11794-2400
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 23:49:01 EDT
From:         Leonard Boyle <LENBOYLE@CCVM.SUNYSB.EDU>
Subject:      re: wdsf/dos

Hello

I fetched the latest wdsf/dos client level-set ptf. This ptf includes
new functionality by supporting IBM's and FTP's TCPIP products.
Unfortuany for us we do not use these products. Most of our users
use the Clarkson version of TN3270.

Does anyone know if IBM is going to support the Clarkson version of TN3270?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 13:49:54 EST
From:         Liu <SURU@TWNMOE10.BITNET>
Subject:      Problem with legal IP network numbers

Dear Netters,

    We have problems with some legal IP network numbers which NSFNET
refuses to put them in the core gateway. Why? We have been allocated
several dozen class B and over 200 class C network numbers. And the
authority for NSFNET refuses to put most of the class C network
numbers in the core gateway. Does that mean we can't use those network
numbers?

    I have a solution to this problem though not good enough:

    1. Spilit our network into two topological parts, A for networks
       with their network numbers registered in NSFNET and B for
       those not in NSFNET.

    2. Set up two mail gateways, Gin and Gout, in part A.

    3. Allocate a dummy domain, dummy.TW, for hosts in part B.

    4. Add only a MX RR for dummy.TW such as "*.dummy.TW. MX 0 Name-for-Gin"
       in the name server for domain TW.

    5. Set up a bogus root name server in part B containing a lot of MX
       RRs for domain Edu, Com, Net,... as follows:

                *.Edu. MX 0 Name-for-Gout
                *.Com. MX 0 Name-for-Gout
                *.Net. MX 0 Name-for-Gout
                           .
                           .
                           .
                *.Edu.TW MX 0 Name-for-Gout
                *.Gov.TW MX 0 Name-for-Gout
                *.Net.TW MX 0 Name-for-Gout

    6. Gin query the bogus root name servers in Part B and Gout query the
       normal name server in Part A for resolution. Then Gin will forward
       mails to hosts in Part B, and Gout will forward mails to the
       outside world.

    7. Hosts in Part B can still access (telnet, ftp, ...) hosts in Part
       A (not the whole Internet) by only IP address and vice versa.

    Any suggestion or comment will be very much appreciated.

Regards,  --Liu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: IBMTCP-L@PUCC.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 14:52:10 -0400
From:         Peter Coleman <pcoleman@MCMAIL.CIS.MCMASTER.CA>
Subject:      Re: TCP/IP v1.02 pauses on long FTP

I have a similar problem with identical hardware and TCP/IP version.  We
have a batch production job that FTP's a log file from a Next PC each
night. The problem has occurred twice in the last 2 weeks.  If the job is
re-executed, it works fine.

Peter Coleman                (pcoleman@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca)
ABB 132
McMaster University          (416)529-7070x3856
Hamilton, Ontario


On Thu, 30 Jul 1992, Byron Chun wrote:

> We have TCP/IP V1.02 installed on our MVS 3.1.3; DFP 3. It seems
> that the TCPIP address space pauses for up to 30 seconds during
> GET commands from a batch initiated FTP job.  The file being retrieved
> is 34MB in length.  The first 7MB transfers fine, then the pausing
> begins.  (retrieve 1MB, pause, retrieve 2MB, pause, retrieve 1MB ...)
>
> I have tried to alter the dispatching priority , ISV rate, etc...
> to no avail.  The TCPIP address space still pauses.  Here is the
> caveot (sp?).  If I have a workstation connected via TCPIP to the
> system, and that workstation has periodic transmissions (screen update
> key press, etc.)  then the entire file transmits without the pausing.
>
> BTW, the hardware is a BTI ELC-2 lan adaptor.
>
> Thanks in advance for any advice or fixes.
>
> --
> byron@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu           =====================================
>                                   | My employer will allow me to have |
> "It's not in my job description,  | an opinion.  They just won't back |
>  but I'll do it anyway."          | me if things go sour.             |
>                                   =====================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 29 Jul 1992 09:32:43 CDT
From:         Apollo Silva <C144ARS@UTARLVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      TCP/IP Connectivity question

Hello,

I need some information concerning the feasibility of connecting two MVS
machines running TCP/IP v2r2, both machines running as guests under VM/ESA.
I would like to establish a virtual CTC connection between the two MVS's.

As an example, here's what I hope to accomplish:

                       +------------------------+
                       |         VM/ESA         |
                       +------------------------+
                       | MVS/SP    |    MVS/ESA |
                       |          ctc           |
                       |    vtam ----- vtam     |
                       |           |            |
                       |          vctc          |
                       |  tcp/ip ----- tcp/ip   |
                       +-----|------------------+
                             |
                           +---+
                           |BTI|
                           +---+

Can this be accomplished?  If so, please let me know.  Thanks.

+---------------------------------+       U   U TTTTT  AAA
 +  Apollo R. Silva                +      U   U   T   A   A
  + UT-Arlington Academic Computing +     U   U   T   AAAAA
 +  c144ars@utarlvm1.uta.edu       +      U   U   T   A   A
+---------------------------------+        UUU    T   A   A
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
address: PO Bx 140125, Brooklyn, NY 11214-0002, USA
Phone: 1-718-946-6148
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 22:47:00 EDT
From:         FPEOC@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU
Subject:      Tcp/ip os/2 1.2.1
X-cc:         Frank P Esposito <FPEOC@CUVMB.BITNET>

I have nfs running  on os/2 1.3 with tcpip 1.2.1. I  am issuing the mount
command (in os2) to  mount a vm disk, but the  mount command is prompting
for  the  cp  logon  password.  Is  there a  way  to  prevent  this  from
happening? I  even wrote a  rexx exec to issued  the mount with  a 'push'
inside, but the mount command didn't read from the stack.

Frank P. Esposito
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 21 Jul 1992 14:06:15 EST
From:         Jim Jones <JIMJ@JHUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Didn't someone have a FINGER server written REXX?

 I thought I remembered someone offering a REXX FINGER server on this
 list in the past few months, but I can't find any mention of it in
 the list archives.  Well, of course I need something like that now,
 and was wondering if the author was still around.  And while I am
 interested in a FINGER server specifically, I'm really desparate for
 a REXX server of any kind.  I've been handed the task of getting a
 Talaris 2090 TCP/IP based printer working and I'm going to have to
 write an accounting server.  Since I've never written a TCP/IP based
 application before, I'd like to see some working code first!

 Thanks in advance,
 -jj

 PS - A sample C-based server would be of interest too.  I'm doing my
 best to avoid having to code it in Pascal, since I'm not particularly
 skilled in or fond of Pascal.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 30 Jul 1992 11:27:08 PDT
From:         Byron Chun <byron@SFSUVAX1.SFSU.EDU>
Subject:      TCP/IP v1.02 pauses on long FTP
X-To:         ibmtcp-l@pucc.princeton.edu
X-cc:         Heidi Schmidt <heidis@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu>,
              Jon Naumann <chance@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu>,
              Jack Tse <jack@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu>

We have TCP/IP V1.02 installed on our MVS 3.1.3; DFP 3. It seems
that the TCPIP address space pauses for up to 30 seconds during
GET commands from a batch initiated FTP job.  The file being retrieved
is 34MB in length.  The first 7MB transfers fine, then the pausing
begins.  (retrieve 1MB, pause, retrieve 2MB, pause, retrieve 1MB ...)

I have tried to alter the dispatching priority , ISV rate, etc...
to no avail.  The TCPIP address space still pauses.  Here is the
caveot (sp?).  If I have a workstation connected via TCPIP to the
system, and that workstation has periodic transmissions (screen update
key press, etc.)  then the entire file transmits without the pausing.

BTW, the hardware is a BTI ELC-2 lan adaptor.

Thanks in advance for any advice or fixes.

--
byron@sfsuvax1.sfsu.edu           =====================================
                                  | My employer will allow me to have |
"It's not in my job description,  | an opinion.  They just won't back |
 but I'll do it anyway."          | me if things go sour.             |
                                  =====================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <lbdyck@osreq48.rockwell.com>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 10:13:53 PST
From:         "Lionel B. Dyck" <lbdyck@OSREQ48.ROCKWELL.COM>
Subject:      SMTP to IBMMAIL Question
X-To:         ibmtcp-l@pucc.princeton.edu

I am trying to send mail from the LaMail application running under TCP/IP 1.2.1
under OS/2 on my workstation out to an IBM Mail Exchange Address.  I am doing
this using the SMTP started task on our MVS system and nothing is getting out.

A sample address format that I am using is:

        usrokntn%ibmmail@wcc1a.rockwell.com

Nothing ever arrives at usrokntn.

This used to work until this weekend when IIN changed the IBM Mail Exchange
server to IMX 113.

Is there a direct Internet connection to the IBM Mail Exchange or is there a
solution to this problem....?

Thanks.



>>>  One of the most dangerous forms of human error is forgetting   <<<
>>>       what one is trying to achieve......Paul Nitze             <<<
*---------------------------------------------------------------------*
* Lionel B. Dyck              | Rockwell TSO:      WCC1.$A1238        *
* M/C:       110-SE28         | Rockwell VM:       ISCEMS(LBDYCK)     *
* Comnet:    797-1125         | IBMLink:           ROK2027            *
* Phone:     (310) 797-1125   | IBM Mail:          USROKNTN           *
* Fax:       (310) 797-3511   | Internet: LBDyck@osreq48.Rockwell.Com *
*---------------------------------------------------------------------*
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 16:32:54 CDT
From:         Bill Hunter <TCPMAINT@UA1VM.UA.EDU>
Subject:      TCPIP V2.2 and ESA1.1 problems
X-To:         IBM TCP/IP List <IBMTCP-L@pucc.Princeton.EDU>

Hello, I'm trying to get TCPIP V2.2 up and running on a 2nd level machine
running ESA1.1 (under VM/XA SP2.1).  I'm trying to get the ESA TCPIP machine
to talk to the XA TCPIP machine via SNALINK.  When the ESA TCPIP machines
tries to start, I get the following errors:

(TCPIP console log follows:)

1TCPIP    AT UAVMESA  VIA RSCS     07/28/92 16:36:26 CDT      TUESDAY
 VM TCP/IP V2R2
    Initializing...
 UnlockAll issuing "CP UNLOCK TCPIP 0 DFF"
 Diagnose 98 real channel program support NOT available
 LCS devices will use virtual channel programs via SIOF
 TCP/IP running under VM/XA system
 Trying to open UAVMESA TCPIP *
 Using profile file UAVMESA TCPIP  *
 DMSSMN109S Virtual storage capacity exceeded
 DMSABE148T System abend 80A called from 00172C2A reason code 00000000
 CMS
 cp log
 CONNECT= 00:00:29 VIRTCPU= 000:00.97 TOTCPU= 000:01.17
 LOGOFF AT 16:36:46 CDT TUESDAY 07/28/92
--------------------------------------------------------------------

The problem does not seem to be a function of how large my VM is (i.e. 14M or
999M) or if I'm a 370 or XA machine.  I suspect that there are a number of
people out there successfully running TCPIP on ESA1.1.  Any suggestions
regarding this problem would be most appreciated....

Thanks, Bill Hunter
The U. of Alabama
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: ibmtcp-l@PUCC.BITNET
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 21 Jul 1992 15:56:18 CET
From:         "P. de Vries" <vries@RC7.NHL.NL>
Subject:      subscription

subscribe P. de Vries

--

==============================================================================
=                                                                            =
=  P. de Vries                            * Telefoon     : 058 - 961436      =
=  Systemadministrator/Systemprogrammer   * Alg. tel.    : 058 - 961444      =
=  Noordelijke Hogeschool Leeuwarden      * FAX          : 058 - 150125      =
=  Fonteinland 7                          * E-mail       : vries@rc7.nhl.nl  =
=  8913 CZ Leeuwarden                                                        =
=  The Netherlands                                                           =
=                                                                            =
==============================================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 29 Jul 1992 08:50:53 EDT
From:         TOSDRST@GE1VM.SCHDY.GE.COM
Subject: change FAL-VM TCPIP Inform messages from PRT S
X-To:         ibmtcp-l@pucc.princeton.edu

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From:
Subject: change FAL-VM TCPIP  Inform messages from PRT S
Hello List,
 Without source code changes can the INFORM message DEV and CLASS be
changed ?
Thanks for your assistance.
 Don Smith-GE Schenectady Megacenter

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
From The Desk of Don Smith.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 27 Jul 1992 09:28:26 EDT
From:         "Peter T. Murphy" <PMURPHY@WAYNEST1.BITNET>
Subject:      SNA via IP

     Does anyone know the status of IBM's running SNA across an IP
internet, using FAL and/or HAL?  Running IP across an SNA net is,
of course, old news.


Peter T. Murphy
Lead Prog - Data Comm.
Wayne State Univ. - Detroit
PMurphy@cms.cc.Wayne.edu
PMurphy@WayneSt1.Bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1992 17:42:03 EDT
From:         Roger Fajman <RAF@NIHCU.BITNET>
Subject: Re: CREN NET_USE

> > From CREN NET_USE on LISTSERV@BITNIC:
> >
> >          * CREN networks may be used for the provision of services which
> >            support the needs and purposes of the CREN networks, and for
> >            which a charge is made, if the network is an optional mechanism
> >            for provision of this service for which no additional charge is
> >            made, and as long as the use of the service is consistent with
> >            the bandwidth of the network and the forwarding hosts.
> >            Providers of such information may be non-profit or for-profit
> >            organizations.
>
> OK.  Now, how does that paragraph parse in english???  ;-)

BITNET may be used for chargable services in support of
research and education.

No additional charge may be made for using the service through
BITNET.

Don't overload the network.

It doesn't matter if the service provider is commercial.

(The above is my interpretation only.)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 31 Jul 1992 10:15:04 CDT
From:         Bill Hunter <TCPMAINT@UA1VM.UA.EDU>
Subject:      Gateway definitions for snalink
X-To:         IBM TCP/IP List <IBMTCP-L@pucc.Princeton.EDU>

Hello, I'm having problems with gateway definitions for connections between
TCP/IP V2.1 running on VM/XA SP2.1 and TCP/IP V2.2 running on a 2nd level
ESA 1.1 system.  My network is similar to Fig. 39 on p. 243 of the V2.2 Plan.
and Cust. Guide (SC31-6082-1).  The difference is that I have an ethernet
hung off Host A (VM/XA, FAL2.1) and nothing hung off Host B (ESA, FAL2.2).

Basically, I'm trying to establish a TCP/IP connection between VM/XA and
VM/ESA using an established VTAM CTC link.

My questions are:

1.  Are the definition statements on P. 244 correct?
    When I use "GATEWAY 130.160.4 = snalink 1500 0" on "HOST B" I get
     "Line xx: Net address implies host routing, but HOST not specified"
    When I use "GATEWAY 130.160 = snalink 1500 0.0.255.0 0.0.4.0" I don't
     get any error messages.

    I'm using "GATEWAY 130.160 = eth1 1500 0.0.255.0 0.0.4.0"
          and "        160.160 = snalink 1500 0.0.255.0 0.0.88.0" in my
    config for HOST A.

2.  If anybody out there has a similar configuration, what are the GATEWAY
    and HOME statements that you are using?

I'm sure that there's some subtle point that I'm missing but I can't seem
to find it.  Any suggestions would be most appreciated.

Thanks, Bill Hunter
The U. of Alabama
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, Columbus
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 23 Jul 1992 17:25:44 EDT
From:         Bruce Posey <POSEY@OHSTPHRM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: PS2/95 and TCP/IP
              22 Jul 1992 13:32:19 -0400 from <pcoleman@MCMAIL.CIS.MCMASTER.CA>

On Wed, 22 Jul 1992 13:32:19 -0400 Peter Coleman said:
>Has anyone got a PS2/95 working with TCP/IP? We have been unable to get
>one to work successfully using OS/2 2.0 with IBM TCP/IP or using DOS 5.0
>and various DOS TCP/IP programs including IBM's. I wondered what ethernet
>card was being used and what versions of both OS/2 and IBM TCPIP software.
>
>Thanks,
>       Peter
>
>Peter Coleman                (pcoleman@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca)
Peter,
I have a ps2 95 with OS/2 2.0 running.  I had tcpip working fine using token
ring.  I then installed Lan server and TCPIP died.  I think I screwed up the
PROTOCOL.INI file.  The TCPIP version is the latest refresh.  I just followed
the normal install instructions.

Bruce

------
Bruce Posey           | bitnet: posey@ohstphrm.bitnet
Ohio State University | internet: posey@ohstphrm.pharmacy.ohio-state.edu
College of Pharmacy   | phone: (614) 292-3588
Columbus, Ohio        | "Better living through electronic mail."
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 24 Jul 1992 17:34:00 PDT
From:         Leonard D Woren <LDW@USCMVSA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: ptfs and such via ftp

I think there is one more restriction.  (Or am I confused and this
restriction is for Bitnet?)  The service provider cannot charge extra
for providing fixes/whatever over the net.  It has to be an optional
no-extra-charge alternative to their standard distribution methods.
(I.e., it has to benefit the customer, not (just) the vendor.)

/Leonard
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: ibmtcp-l@PUCC.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 22 Jul 1992 13:32:19 -0400
From:         Peter Coleman <pcoleman@MCMAIL.CIS.MCMASTER.CA>
Subject:      PS2/95 and TCP/IP

Has anyone got a PS2/95 working with TCP/IP? We have been unable to get
one to work successfully using OS/2 2.0 with IBM TCP/IP or using DOS 5.0
and various DOS TCP/IP programs including IBM's. I wondered what ethernet
card was being used and what versions of both OS/2 and IBM TCPIP software.

Thanks,
       Peter

Peter Coleman                (pcoleman@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca)
ABB 132
McMaster University          (416)529-7070x3856
Hamilton, Ontario
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU