HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Anthony 'SCHWAibo' Hobbs)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Debate Results, my opinion.
Date: 15 Oct 92 11:46:12 NZST
Organization: ACCGEK, New Zealand
NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

In article <1992Oct13.214649.3951@ms.uky.edu>, miles@ms.uky.edu (Stephen D. Grant) writes:
> Well I saw it, and it wasn't pretty.
> Gore delivered the knock-out punch in my opinion.
> I kinda felt sorry for the Perot candidate. Although he did get in a couple
> of classic lines. "I think the Nation can see why we're in dead-lock." :)
> Quayle was the big loser.

You think so? I think that Perot has lost any chance in hell he might have had
by picking a "bewildered old man" ((c) BBC World Service) for running mate. I
kept wishing someone would shoot poor Admiral Stockdale and put him out of his
misery.
	But yes, Dan-Oe was rather ridiculous. I think Gore's big advantage was
that he spoke like he was on sedatives, while Danny spoke like he was on
amphetamines. And that line about Kennedy at the beginning was a killer. But
Danny's strategy was obviously to save himself from getting beat up too badly 
by not actually saying anything of substance. As such, it worked - since he 
refused to argue about anthing real, Gore couldn't really rip him to shreds 
like he deserved. Mind you, if Clinton "has trouble telling the truth", then 
Dan-Oe has trouble telling his arse from his elbow.

But why didn't someone yell "Hey Dan, spell potato"?

				- SCHWA.
			(we get CNN in New Zealand...) 
-- 
"I have everything I need to know - 'Bob' told me so!"

Anthony Hobbs		SCHWAibo		    hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
Chief Lord High Priest, ACCGEK - Hail Frozen Yoghurt - Snuggles Loves You
DISCLAIMER: I am not Romanian and was not head of the Securitate for 15 years.
From: popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Debate Results, my opinion.
Date: 16 Oct 92 02:58:56 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy

mea@cbnewse.cb.att.com (mark.e.anderson) writes:

> In article  miles@ms.uky.edu (Stephen D. Grant) writes:
> 
> >Well I saw it, and it wasn't pretty.
> >Gore delivered the knock-out punch in my opinion.
> >I kinda felt sorry for the Perot candidate. Although he did get in a couple
> >of classic lines. "I think the Nation can see why we're in dead-lock." :)
> >Quayle was the big loser.
> 
> This is hard for me to say but I think Our Boy actually pulled one
> off and won this one.  I was mentally keeping score using our official
> scoresheet and it appeared that DQ was raking in points faster than
> Gore with Stockdale finishing last.  
> 
> Poor Stockdale.  He looked and sounded so uncomfortable up there.
> I kind of felt sorry for him.
> 
> Mark

I think Gore won.  Dan didn't really step on his dick bigtime, but he 
twisted the facts something fierce and the newspapers down here had some 
articles vetting the debates that tore him up on this.  It amkes he look 
either dumb, (no!  Can't be.), or a liar.  During the debate, which he 
obviously enjoyed, he looked like the usual shrill vicious republican now 
insuch disreput since the Republican Convention.  The polls in both major 
papers here in Houston, (national polls0, gave the nod to Gore.
  But if Dan wants to run in 1994, er 1996, the far right Republicans 
will probably think well of him for this debate.

But I really doubt Dan's debating skills will 'move any numbers'.

Pope Charles  Subgenius Pope Of Houston

--
popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, (713) 943-2728 in Houston, Texas
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
From: matta@lclark.edu (Matt Alexander)
Subject: Re: Constitutional Questions, and liberalisms....
Keywords: zen, woozel, chincillas, wall paper...
Organization: Sacajawea's Voice
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 00:12:55 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.214354.2025@dscomsf.desy.de> Poser@vxdsyc.desy.de writes:
>In article <1992Oct8.050742.12207@news.unomaha.edu>, kkrueger@cwis.unomaha.edu 

>|>                           This is yet another example of the failure of
>|>public schooling to teach people how to write clearly.  
>
  Clearly an example the failure of the Right Wing to have any imagination
or sense of humor WHAT SO EVER.

>PublikSkooling is HienousHooriBleahPinKommieSeXularHuManistPlot of 
>EvilBrainSuckingDeHuManisingAliensFromOuterSpace(OrEquallyBrainSuckingLiberaLibe
>eraLibraPinKommieDemoKKKRats)ToUnderMineLibertyAppllePieAndTheAmerrriKKKanWay,
>and don't You forget it, KKKomrade! Your SurReptiliousSubliMinalSubversive
>defence of same shows You To Be In League with THEM, ThankYouVeryMuch For 
>Klearing That Up, mein KKKomrade!!!

  You know, you should see a doctor about that...
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: mea@cbnewse.cb.att.com (mark.e.anderson)
Subject: Re: Debate Results, my opinion.
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 04:21:36 GMT

In article  erics@netcom.com (Eric Smith) writes:

>I don't know how you can say Quayle won this one. He didn't make any
>major Q-blunders (darn! I was *so* hoping the quotes file would get
>some good additions!), but he was very excitable, almost out of control,
>and he was not able to articulate any points at all except that Clinton
>can't be trusted. Nothing on why the next four years will be any
>different than the previous four if he and Bush are elected. Bottom
>line, Gore was the only one up there who appeared qualified to be
>President. 

Sorry, I was keeping score using that debate scoresheet that someone
posted here awhile ago.  This scoring system had nothing to do
with what the candidates said rather, how the candidates invoked
reaction from the crowd and moderator.

There was one instance of hissing and another instance of the
moderator asking the crowd to be quiet.  I beleive DQ won points
in both these instances.  

I was waiting for DQ to look where Al Gore was pointing but he
never did.  One of his handlers must be reading this newsgroup.

Mark
From: wilson@glitch.cs.jhu.edu (Dwight Wilson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dan Quayle, AI
Date: 8 Oct 92 18:35:28 GMT
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University CS Department

In article <7077@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> dejst5+@pitt.edu (David   E Joslin) writes:
>I wrote (quoting a 10/7/92 NY Times article):
>>A Quayle aide explained Dan's problem as follows:
>>	"That's the problem with being Dan Quayle.  Sometimes
>>	there's a data download as he's shifting gears."  
>>If anyone can explain this explanation to me, I would be grateful.
>
>And it just struck me.  "Data download?"  "Shifting gears?" 
>Dan Quayle is a robot, a miracle of Artificial Intelligence.
[...]
>
>Perhaps during the Gore-Quayle debate Danny Boy will open a panel 
>in his head and reveal the truth.  (A note to Gore:  chances are
>all the chips were made in Japan.  Maybe you can get some mileage
>out of this.)
>

What chips?  The quote says that he shifts GEARS!
Obviously Dan Quayle is an implementation of a Difference Engine
(thanks to Bill Bogstad for this interpretation).

This is consistent with Republicans living in the past.

-Dwight
From: JENNY@MAINE.MAINE.EDU (Jennifer F. Murphy)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Vice Shrub Won.
Date: 14 Oct 92 16:00:20 GMT
 <1992Oct14.090411.25772@netcom.com>
Organization: University of Maine System

>>Gore was wooden,

>Gore came off as 100% pure plastic when he was reciting his prepared
>speeches.  He talked like a human being when he was speaking off the
>cuff, but much of the time, he looked, moved, and sounded exactly like
>one of those AudioAnimaTronic things at Disneyland.

This was better than all that had waving Quayle did.
Not to mention his very serious, stern looks.  I think he's been
to a bad acting school or something.

I also wish Gore had nailed Bush on the change of position on the abortion
issue.  Quayle kept harping about his perception of Cliniton's changes
on positions;  this was a big miss as well.  (For the record, Bush was
pro-choice up until he became Uncle Ronnie's running mate.)
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Debate
Date: 14 Oct 92 19:38:02 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <1992Oct14.131013.22904@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>
>YOU know, in the presidential debate, I thought Perot was a democratic 
>plant, there to attack Bush while Clinton remained above the fray.
>
>However, Adm Stcokdale is CLEARLY a republican plant, there to prove that
>it is possible to be more incoherent than DQ.

A simple explanation: the Dems had a Perot voodoo doll ready on
Sunday, and could control his every movement.  The GOP had a Stockdale
doll on Tuesday, and sacrificed a chicken just that afternoon to
nullify the Democratic spell.  But the spell didn't work completely.
Stockdale's apparent confusion was caused when both major parties
tried to gain control.  During one particularly violent magical salvo
by the GOP, the Admiral's head jerked, and his hearing aide came out.

Simple, eh?

>
>Was anyone else hoping Quayle and Gore would actually get into a fistfight?

Gore would win.  He's Clark Kent in disguise as a Senator.


--
"Moors."  "Moops."  "Moors."  "Moops."  Psssssssssssss.....
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson)
Subject: Re: The most important poll, and Quayle wins
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 10:34:47 GMT

In <1992Oct14.025658.59688@cc.usu.edu> sl930@cc.usu.edu writes:


>I have to admit I watched the debate tonite with anxiousness.  I was afraid
>Quayle would mess up again.  Well, I would never have guessed he would be
>as tough as he was.  I am really impressed with him.  Gore may have been 
>more polished, but he could have been easily been replaced with a tape
>recorder.  Talk about rehearsed.

Best part was....just before every time Gore spoke ("Bill Clinton and
I....") you could see the aid behind him pull the string....

I kept expecting Gore to say "Math class is tough."

Michael
From: JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: New Quayle Quote (NY Times, 10/7/92)
Date: 12 Oct 92 23:11:09 GMT
Organization: Penn State University

In article <D2150056.fuc2o9@erics.infoserv.com>, erics@infoserv.com (Eric S.
Smith) says:
>
>JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>
>> And don't forget, they also held the senate for six of those 12 years.
>
>No, I don't think we can give them that. I believe they only held the
>Senate for two years (the first two years of Reagan's presidency).
>

BZZZT.  Sorry, Eric - we've been down this road before.  I've looked it
up *three* times and posted, so I'm not going to do it again, but the
Reprobates held the Senate until the 1986 election - when those "Reagan
coattail" Republicans were defeated.

I'm starting to think this "only two years" mistake is fostered by the
endless whining of "borrow-and-spend" Republicans asking for "a chance."

Hope this helps.

Jeff Luck                *The opinions are mine, but facts are facts*
CES Systems Office
Penn State University       "Whatever you guys want, I'm for."
JFL4@PSUVM.PSU.EDU             -Dan Quayle to Ohio Farmers, 1988
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Subject: Re: more bashing (USDA AAAA Flame Bait)
Reply-To: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 14:37:34 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.054237.15655@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca>,
huang@mwilliams.eche.ualberta.ca () writes:
> Can those Quayle bashers find some place else to masturbate?  This
> place is santified for the genuine fan of The Honourable J. Danforth
> Quayle.  Please return to the original intent.  Thanks.

   I've been in this group since it's appearance and the
only change was a small invasion by Retch Lame-Bah fans (I
may have the spelling wrong; I didn't follow the threads). 
This has allways been a tounge-in-cheek group for discussion
of Je. Danforth as he really is.

   But since you seem to _think_ there is something worthwhile about
the Ve.Pe.  perhaphs you could tell us what it is?  The part in his
hair? His extinguished looking sideburns?  His slice?

   Warning, go down to Wally World and buy (one each):

   Suit, Asbestos
   Humor, Sense of

before you start.  No charge for the advice.

Dan
Danwell@IASTATE.EDU
From: plu@math.psu.edu (Todd Andrew Simpson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Weekly Reader Survey: Bush/Quayle preferred by kids!
Date: 9 Oct 92 16:48:09 GMT
	<1992Oct9.032658.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu>
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Department of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University

In article <1992Oct9.032658.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu> f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin) writes:

   Usually the opinions of kids are good barometers for the election in
   general.  (It won't be this year, but it has been in the past.)

   Maybe the kids didn't see the Rep. Convention and think of Bush as a
   kindly grandfather type, whereas Clinton is simply "the other kid's
   dad," without any emotional pull.  Perot is likely the crusty old
   grandfather (Mr. Wilson-type) without a bit of charity in his body.

   Of course Quayle is the friendly Golden Retriever whom every kid
   wants to play with and take to Show and Tell.

This subject reminds me of the Republican family down the street from
us twenty years ago.  Evidently McGovern had said something or other
about the need to save energy, and so these people had their children
telling everyone at school that McGovern planned to shut down
Disneyland.  (I'm not making this up.)  This probably would have swung
a Weekly Reader poll in Nixon's favor (not that Nixon should have been
afraid of McGovern anyway, though I guess he was).

- Todd Andrew Simpson
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: bumperstickers
Date: 8 Oct 92 15:56:22 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <1992Oct8.021507.15285@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca> huang@mwilliams.eche.ualberta.ca () writes:
>I saw two bumperstickers.  One reads "Friends don't let friends vote
>Democrat," and the other, "Vote Republican.  Your country is a
>terrible thing to waste."  Too bad that you Quayle bashers have no
>friends.

Actually, I have lots of personal friends and net-friends.
And none of them are fat fascists, like your idol St. Rush.

>Have fun with a president who will always say yes to Teddy and
>and Howard and Barney and Patricia.  Enjoy his "revenue enhancement" 
>as well.

Several of us have received nasty personal e-mail messages
from this geek.  Try not to be too hard on him;
I have learned that "human" is his second species.
-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: mem@mv.mv.com (Mark E. Mallett)
Subject: Re: The Last Word on "Potatoe".
Organization: MV Communications, Inc.
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 06:32:31 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.161145.19232@u.washington.edu> sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) writes:
>Huh?  I gave up flash cards in first grade (while attending
>public school in Indiana).  This is the first time I've heard the
>excuse that Our Boy was using a card to help spell "potatoe";
>my prior favorite excuse was that Dan-o was under a lot
>of "pressure" dealing with a bunch of little kids.
>Too much competition, I suppose.

Of what relevance is your giving up flash cards?  Why does it matter
that you hadn't heard a particular fact, or that you'd heard some
other excuse?  I do not see why you need to say all those things,
except to throw up flak.


>This reinforces the idea that DQ is the anti-intellectual heir
>to Ronald "Any Idea Which Cannot Be Written On A 3x5 Card
>Is Not Worth Thinking" Reagan, and explains his popularity
>with Reagan's idolators.

As opposed, I suppose, to the notion that any idea that can not be
propped up with a sufficient number of aggressive adjectives and
belittling phrases is not worth stating.

-mm-
-- 
Mark E. Mallett  MV Communications, Inc./ PO Box 4963/ Manchester NH/ 03108
Bus. Phone: 603 429 2223    Home: 603 424 8129     BIX: mmallett
Internet: mem@mv.MV.COM  ( uucp: ...{decvax|harvard}!mv!mem )
Looking for news and mail in southern NH / northern MA?  Try MV!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann)
Subject: Re: Extra! Dan is a Genius!
Organization: Society for Putting Things on Top of Other Things
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 01:58:30 GMT


Oh, oh, John Switzer's back!  This time he quoted an entire article
and only added his signature, a move I would expect from a supporter
of the Danster.

But then again, he's dropped the President Quayle prognostication.
Maybe he can learn.

-- 
Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer.  Take your pick.

Centigram Communications Corp, San Jose California  408/428-3553
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: marca@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Marc Andreessen)
Subject: Re: Please Help
Organization: Nat'l Center for Supercomputing Applications
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 05:26:04 GMT

10.) What do you do when some moron posts a completely irrelevant and
     ponderously useless pseudo-questionnaire to alt.fan.dan-quayle?

Stuff his bodily orifices with Agent Orange     [ ]
Thread barbed wire through his nose and then    [ ]
 through his tongue and pull back and forth on
 both ends with a sawing motion
Mash his face repeatedly into a pile of smashed [ ]
 fluorescent lights and TV picture tubes
Shoot him in the gut with a 12-gauge shotgun    [ ]
Chalk it up to his life as a poster child       [ ]
 for birth control

Marc

ObDano:
Polls are done to get a certain result.  I've had copies of polls that
 have been smuggled to me from members of the press where the actual
 poll data is far different that what comes out in the media.  It is
 selectively produced.
                -- Marilyn Quayle, on the media conspiracy to make
                   Danny look bad.

--
Marc Andreessen
Software Development Group
National Center for Supercomputing Applications
marca@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: Debate
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 04:13:19 GMT

In article <1992Oct14.212122.16853@rchland.ibm.com> jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl) writes:
>
>Gore woulda took him...
>Even Jean-Luc Picard coulda kicked Quayles butt....

That's CAPTAIN Jean-Luc Picard to you, mister.
Belittling of Capt. Picard is way out.


--
"Moors."  "Moops."  "Moors."  "Moops."  Psssssssssssss.....
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sysmatt@aix3090b.uky.edu (Matt Simpson)
Subject: Re: bumperstickers
    <92282.182526JFL4@psuvm.psu.edu>
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 07:56:34 GMT

Speaking of bumperstickers, I'm going to repost this request, because I'm
still looking. I have a friend who has a friend who gave him a T-shirt he\
bought in Chicago that says "Lick Bush in 92". If anyone knows a source
for bumperstickers with this slogan, please let me know.
--
This signature file exists because our crappy newsreader won't work without it.
From: garrett@Ingres.COM (FRIENDS DON'T LET FRIENDS VOTE REPUBLICAN)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: New Responsibilities for D.Q.
Summary: Spelling
Keywords: Debates, Council on Competitiveness, Help Wanted (Part Time)
Date: 13 Oct 92 01:17:55 GMT
Organization: ASK Computer Systems, Ingres Product Division
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1

In article <1992Oct12.152256.6567@gvl.unisys.com>, train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge)             writes...
  And, by his own admission, Dan's Latin isn't good enough to 
>  quailfy him for an assignment in South America.  What to do, what to do?
>  I put it to YOU, some of the most creative minds on the planet:  what
>  sould Dan Quayle be doing during a second Bush term (assuming there is
>  one)? 
> 
Hmmm. Dilemma, dilemma. Here's a few ideas:
	1) Starting the Dan Quayle Memorial Library.
	2) Finding out just where IS Hawaii.
	3) Becoming the first astronaut to breath on Mars.
	4) Playing with Millie.
	5) Becoming the greatest golfer in vice-prez history.
	6) Combing his hair.
	7) Saying to Marilyn," Are you through yet?"
	
	Just a few ideas.

-Garrett 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Subject: Re: The Last Word on "Potatoe".
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:20:08 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.063231.3447@mv.mv.com> mem@mv.mv.com (Mark E. Mallett) writes:
>In article <1992Oct6.161145.19232@u.washington.edu> sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) writes:
>>Huh?  I gave up flash cards in first grade (while attending
>>public school in Indiana).  This is the first time I've heard the
>>excuse that Our Boy was using a card to help spell "potatoe";
>>my prior favorite excuse was that Dan-o was under a lot
>>of "pressure" dealing with a bunch of little kids.
>>Too much competition, I suppose.
>
>Of what relevance is your giving up flash cards?  Why does it matter
>that you hadn't heard a particular fact, or that you'd heard some
>other excuse?  I do not see why you need to say all those things,
>except to throw up flak.

I didn't make anything up.  I was responding to the FULL article
which claimed that Our Boy read the misspelling of "potato"
from a card given to him by some handler.

Why does it matter?  To what existential context are you
referring?  To me, the flash card quip matters only
insofar as it's my humble attempt to contribute 
my fair share of levity to alt.fan.dan-quayle.
THAT'S WHAT WE ARE HERE FOR!  Sheesh.
>
>>This reinforces the idea that DQ is the anti-intellectual heir
>>to Ronald "Any Idea Which Cannot Be Written On A 3x5 Card
>>Is Not Worth Thinking" Reagan, and explains his popularity
>>with Reagan's idolators.
>
>As opposed, I suppose, to the notion that any idea that can not be
>propped up with a sufficient number of aggressive adjectives and
>belittling phrases is not worth stating.

I don't often use this group for discussions of "ideas".
This is a group dedicated to the examination of the
life and career of one of the most fascinating 
politicians in recent years.  Ridicule is a primary
M.O., because the Dandroid richly deserves it.
If your find this troublesome, just put me 
in your kill file.  Or go elsewhere.

>Mark E. Mallett  MV Communications, Inc./ PO Box 4963/ Manchester NH/ 03108

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dan Quayle, AI
Date: 8 Oct 1992 19:59:13 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

dejst5+@pitt.edu (David   E Joslin) writes:

>(If Dan Quayle were a robot, the most impressive thing about it
>would be how well it plays golf.)

I guess it would also explain how he puts up with Marilyn...
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh