HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nix@aslslc43.asl.dl.nec.com (David Nix)
Subject: Re: AFC vs. NFC drivel
Organization: NEC America, Inc Irving TX
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 17:48:56 GMT

>             Any unbiased observer would have to admit that the NFC
> (excuse me Mr Anal Retentive, make that NFL) teams who moved to the
> AFC/AFL (are you happy now?) were basically NFC/NFL teams for several
> years after their move. By the early 80s, turnover being what it is
> with players and coaches, the Browns/Steelers/Colts (if I left any out,
> I'm sure you'll correct me!) lost whatever distinctions one could make
> between the two leagues/conferences.

This still doesn't explain why 5 of the initial Superbowls were won by AFL
franchises (Oakland, Miami, KC, NY Jets).  Within 2 years after the merger
Miami was the best team in the NFC/AFC/AFL/NFL, perfect record and all. 
And this by an AFL team.  

Personally, I think this AFC/NFC dominance crap is more curious than
anything else.  Why would one league dominate for 11 years, then a complete
flip-flop occur and another league dominates?  I have a theory.  Miami rose
to the top of the NFL in the early 70's forcing the other AFC teams into a
sort of football arms race to stop the Dolphins, which resulted in some
powerhouse Steeler and Raider teams of that era.  In the early 80's the
49ers came to the fore and caused the same reaction in the NFC.  So, 
according to this logic, which league will dominate the 90's?  The league
with the next up and coming powerhouse team.  Could be Dallas, NO, or 
Minnesota in the NFC to keep the NFC dominant, or it could be San Diego,
Buffalo, or Pittsburgh in the AFC to swing the pendulum back the other
way.  It might be the Colts or some heretofore sorry team.  Just a thought.

Nix
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (The Purple Bleeder )
Subject: Skins/Vikes ...Prelude to the playoff
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 16:19:41 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

Yesterday, on Monday night football, Dan had an interesting comment.
He says and I quote " Before the game starts between the Skins and
the Vikes, the Skins should walk down the length of the field and
thank the Vikes for keeping their season alive" :-)\

On a serious note, this is going to be another tough game, IMO.
These two met in the regular season at the Dome and it was
a brutal one.  Ripyen was just *abused* by the super-D at will.
But the Skins squeezed past the Vikes by 2 points, and all their
points came by field goals. The final score was 15-13. However,
the Vike-O was struggling at that time with Gannon at the helm.
But so were the Skins with an O-line decimated by injuries.

Now, the Vikes have Salsbury at the helm and I always believed
and hold to this day that he is a better QB than Gannon. But
the O-line of the Skins has also got healthy and Ripyen should
get good pass protection, but he is inaccurate. But one can
never say when one gets hot. 

To top it, the Redskins have a great record at the Dome (4-0)
and this should boost their confidence. At the same time, I
also hope that the Vikes learn from their previous encounter
with the Skins. 

Finally, I will add that both the teams stand a 50-50 chance
of winning this game.

S.h
From: kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 'Twas NBC Re: Raiders vs. Redskins (CBS' unprofessionalism)
Date: 28 Dec 92 05:30:59 GMT
Organization: UB

In article <1992Dec28.021659.7193@wam.umd.edu> loffit@wam.umd.edu (Dixie Cup) writes:
>In article <Bzw5B5.33n@acsu.buffalo.edu> kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) writes:
>>After Washington's touchdown that put them in the lead 20-14 in the fourth
>>quarter, CBS displayed the words to "Hail to the Redskins" while the
>>Redskins' marching band played the song. I thought that NFL football
>>coverage was supposed to be unbiased. I guess I was wrong. This was a very
>>unprofessional move by CBS.
>>
>>Final Score:
>>LA         21
>>Washington 20
>>
>>Disclaimer: I am neither a Raiders fan nor a Redskins fan, but I am a Bills
>>fan.
>
>It was NBC, not CBS.  I am a Redskins fan and also believe they were very

No, it was CBS. Check again.

>unproffesional.  It was obvious from the pre-game show that the announcers
>were biased towards Washington.  In my opinion NBC has the worst football
>coverage of the three non-cable networks (ESPN is THE worst; ought to
>axe Theismann).  Just my opinions, nothing more.

I agree with you about Theismann. He says some of the most idiotic things
during a game, like "The offense will have to score here if they want to
win." I mean, this guy is profound!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: metv@triton.unm.edu ()
Subject: Re: The Packers still suck
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 17:31:51 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Distribution: usa

In article <1992Dec21.203305.12516@doug.cae.wisc.edu> chrisc@cae.wisc.edu (Chris Carey) writes:
>In article <1992Dec21.210312.22823@weber.com> steve@weber.com (Steve Keshen) writes:
>>Subject line says it all!
>
>

Either you're not follow football well or you are a Rams fan.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett)
Subject: Re: Where will Joe go?
Organization: Abode Computer Systems
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 18:13:09 GMT

In article <1993Jan1.215022.28462@cis.ohio-state.edu> martens@laurel.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens) writes:
>In article <GILFORD.92Dec31141341@lexus.vuse.vanderbilt.edu> gilford@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Gilford T. Hapanyengwi) writes:
>My far-fetched prediction:  Green Bay (Holmgren & Wolf) picks
>Montana up for a conditional 6th round pick.  Majkowski's not
>likely to stay in GB, and Montana (regardless of whether he wants
>to start) would be a good backup for Favre for the next couple of
>years.

Montana already said that he won't be a backup.

Eric

-- 

		Internet: eric@abode.ttank.com
		    uucp: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!wvus!abode!eric
From: carrato@acsu.buffalo.edu (Michael Carrato)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Hey Ed Lor, Bills 4-0 vs NFC, one more NFC team to beat
Date: 22 Dec 92 06:28:58 GMT
Organization: UB

dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch) writes:

>In article <BzLBCD.A1q@acsu.buffalo.edu> v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:
>>This game down to which defense was
>>better, and the Bills showed that they were the better
>>defense

>If you really believe this, you ignorance of what defense means is staggering.

What is your idea of what defense means then? Seems to me that the Bills
defense won this game...

I guess "defense" means "NFC" in your eyes? 

Mike
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 49er QBs
Date: 29 Dec 92 20:02:56 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Dec29.151404.26611@asl.dl.nec.com> nix@aslslc43.asl.dl.nec.com (David Nix) writes:
|A question from a non-49er fan:
|
|If you were in George Seifert's shoes next season, would you bench the
|league MVP to give one of the all-time great QBs one more year of glory?
|Montana has already said that he will NOT be a backup, so this is what 
|George must do in order to keep Montana with San Francisco.
 
Seems to me that is what spring training is for.  Right now it's Youngs job
to keep but shouldn't Montana have the chance to beat him out for the job.
Forget about the MVP, last years highest rated quarterback, and all-time
great QB's crap.  You've got two or three quarterbacks in spring training
fighting for the starting job.  The winner is the starter and the loser
can evaluate his options.  I bet if it were up two the three QB's that's
exactly how they would want it.

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
+==========================================================================+
From: vxb8773@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: VIKINGS WIN!!! 6-3
Date: 21 Dec 92 18:18:59 GMT
Reply-To: vxb8773@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology

mathematically, the vikes can be the 2nd seed with a win against the packers,
2 losses by dallas to the falcons and bears, and one lose by the eagles to
the giants.

i didnt say it was going to happen but it is possible. i would rather be the
3rd seed beacuse the vikes need to continue to play in order to adjust
their offensive problems

							vinnie
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: (no subject given)
Date: 23 Dec 92 14:44:45 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <92358.100707RZANDBER@ESOC.BITNET> RZANDBER@ESOC.BITNET (RENE ZANDBERGEN) writes:
>Subject: Some thoughts
>
>1) What is Buddy doing these days? Wasn't he the defensive coordinator
>   of the Bears under Ditka, when that defense won them the Superbowl?
>   Makes you wonder, with all these rumours about Ditka...

Rumour has it that Ryan is in good with the Bears owner and management but
probably wouldn't get head coaching job.  Think about how the Chicago media
and Ryan would fo to each other.  And yes he was the D coordinator of Da
Bears 1985 defense (one of the best of all time if you ask me).

>
>2) What is Schottenheimer's record against Denver??? If Elway is healthy
>   I give the Chiefs little chance. That would mean Denver would be in as
>   a wildcard.

I think it's something like Elway has beaten Marty 14 times out of 17 meetings
going back to Marty's days with Cleveland and "The Drive".

>
>3) If the Eagles make it to the Superbowl, their opponent will have to
>   be Denver, because Dallas, Washington and the Giants have all played
>   Denver in the SB. Of course, since the Eagles lost their first SB
>   to the only wildcard team that ever won it, history points to Denver
>   winning it all this time, doesn't it?? :-)

Two wildcards in the Super Bowl??  What are the odds to this??

>
>4) Who is hosting this year's SB, the NFC or the AFC? I guess this
>   determines who gets to wear white jerseys.
>
>5) I hope KC or the Bills make it to the SB, because they are the teams
>   that CAN beat ANY NFC team.

Well, maybe...  K.C. was beaten by an inferior GIANTS team this weekend.
I'd add Pittsburgh to this list.  They have a good defense and can run the
ball down your throat (provided Bubby isn't their QB). 

I'd like to see a close one and hope the AFC wins one...

>
>Just my thoughts,
>                  Rene Zandbergen

satish nair
giants (is he gone yet?)
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Minnesota Vikings - 1993 Schedule.
Date: 29 Dec 92 22:01:45 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Dec29.214234.9834@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> pboxrud@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul D Boxrud) writes:
>In article <C01Ey3.EtL@ns1.nodak.edu> sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (The Purple Blee
>der ) writes:
|>Anybody know the 1993 schedule of the Vikes. If so could
|>u post or e-mail it to me.

Giving up on 1992 already?

|>A Big Thanx!
|>S.h
|>Forever Vikes Period.
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|That's a long time to have a period :-)

So that's it.  All this whining is due to PMS. :-)

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jjungbau@luke.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer)
Subject: Re: Bad Boy Green Bay Bob
Organization: Washington State University, Pullman
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 01:24:50 GMT

In article <19921228.092846.14@almaden.ibm.com> heavy-metal@vnet.ibm.com writes:
>oh, I almost forgot. There was also a guy selling shirt with the saying
>"*expletive* Green Bay" on them. Classy guy, real classy. I'm glad to say
>that he was arrested shortly there after.

Arrested for selling shirts???!!!  Good grief, what is wrong with people?
I have seen similar shirts everywhere... they are a big part of the rivalries
that exist in PAC-10 athletics.  We have "Huck the Fuskies" shirts here.  And
another favorite is the "F.U.C.L.A." slogan, which turns into a chant at 
home football and basketball games against the Bruins.  Granted, these aren't
explicitly vulgar, but I have seen plenty that were.  Perhaps he was arrested
for selling without a permit or something.

Jim 
-- 
Jim Jungbauer               | Go Vikings, North Stars, Twins, Cougars!
jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu  | 
EECS Department             | "Nice move by Bellows... big drive... SCORES!"
Washington State University |    -- Mike Emrick, 1991 Norris Division Finals
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rrleck@custer.uucp (bob leck)
Subject: Re: a billboard in houston
Organization: Exxon
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 18:10:47 GMT

In article <30DEC199210230964@rosie.uh.edu> libr@rosie.uh.edu (Harvey Brauner) writes:
>In article <1hsea5INNegv@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds) writes...
>>In article <C01zqr.CE@hpuerca.atl.hp.com> krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes) writes:
>> >Only Houston fans would count injuries 9sad,, very sad)
>
>You talking to me?!  I don't think so.
>
>>The "Sign" is on a famous Mexican food eatery Papasito's it reads:
>> 
>>HOUSTON 27
>>BUFFALO  3
>>INJURIES 8
>> 
>>stuff deleted
>
>
>Yeah, I saw the sign too...But I got a chuckle out of it.  My interpretation
>was that they were counting TOTAL injuries on both sides.  Seeing how this
>restaurant always puts up some weird and goofy saying every week I wouldn't
>put to much into it.
>
>>To voice your outrage call:
>> 
>>The Houston Oilers
>>1-(713)797-9111
>> 
>>Papasitos Cantina
>>1-(713)668-5756
>
>While your at it order the Fajita Special...I hear it's really good :)
>
>>And people ask me why Im a Dallas fan here in Houston ?
>>I rest my case......
>> Go Cowboys !!!!!!
>>tim
>
>What case? 
>
>         Harvey Brauner - libr@jetson.uh.edu  | Systems Department    
>                          crunge@menudo.uh.edu| Univeristy Libraries  
>                                              | University of Houston 

You can keep your Cowboys!!!!!! Go Oilers
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson)
Subject: Re: Vikings Playoff chances/QB
Reply-To: bergerson@mayo.edu
Organization: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 15:33:53 GMT




In article <13773@express>, currie@Software.Mitel.COM (Kim Currie) writes:
->From: currie@Software.Mitel.COM (Kim Currie)
->Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
->Subject: Re: Vikings Playoff chances/QB
->
->In article <BzoD76.E89@ns1.nodak.edu> sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (The Purple Bleeder ) writes:
->>I just cannot wait for the Vikes to get hold of a real QB
->>like Buerlein or Walsh or Tomzak etc. etc.  As somebody
->
->COME ON!  Buerlein???  Tomczak???  These guys are no better (possibly
->worse) than what the Vikings have now.  I agree the Vikings can improve
->themselves by upgrading the QB position, but I don't think the rest of
->the NFC is `shivering' at the prospect.  They still have questionable
->special teams, a running back who fumbles waaay too often, and an
->overly conservative offensive scheme.
->
->        
->Kim
->
->
--
Are you a guy or a gal???  Either way, you don't know what you are talking 
about.  The Vikings have excellent special teams.  One of the best and 
fiercest place-kickers in Fuad "killer" Reveiz and Harry Newsome is the best
punter in the NFC.  The offense is not overly conservative, it has just taken
a lot of time to adjust to a totally new offensive scheme.  Just wait until
next year for the O to roll.  Terry Allen does not fumbel Waaaaaay too often,
it has just been a couple of times all year.  He more than makes up for it.

And Sean Salisbury will be a fine QB with more playing time.


*******************************************************************************
Chad D. Bergerson                            Internet: bergerson@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic                                  Voice: (507) 255-7567
200 First Street SW                          FAX: (507) 255-5484
Mail Stop 2D-334 STM            "In my dream I was drowning my sorrows  
Rochester, MN  55905             But my sorrows they learned to swim..." - U2
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
Subject: NFL PLAYOFFS picture
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 14:47:50 GMT

NFL PLAYOFFS

NFC							AFC

Wild Card:						Wild Card:

Saturday Jan. 2					Saturday, Jan. 2	
Washington at Minnesota			Kansas at San Diego

Sunday, Jan. 3 					Sunday, Jan. 3
Eagles at New Orleans				Houston at Buffalo


Divisional Playoffs				Divisional Playoffs

Saturday, Jan. 9 				Saturday, Jan. 9
Sunday, Jan. 10					Sunday, Jan. 10

Wildcard winner at Dallas			Wildcard winner at Pittsburg
Wildcard winner at 49ers			Wildcard winner at Miami
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: alan@tsd.arlut.utexas.edu (Alan Martin)
Subject: Re: Aikman a weakness?!? (was Re: It wasn't Pretty (49ers WON))
Organization: Applied Research Labs, University of Texas at Austin
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 19:52:37 GMT

douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit) writes:

>alan@tsd.arlut.utexas.edu (Alan Martin) writes:
>>arm for the long pass.  All of his "bombs" seem to have too much air
>>under them, allowing beaten defensive backs to get back into the play.

>Well I don't know if you can say "All of his 'bombs'" and back it up with facts. 
>Does anyone have any real numbers to back this up ? I know he did overthrow Irvin
>on Monday night. I guess your only as good as your last game.


Actually, I liked his last game just fine.  Overthrowing his receivers on
long routes wasn't what I was talking about.  I meant that many of his passes
force the receiver to slow down, thus allowing defensive backs to get back into
the play.  Can I back this up with facts?  Of course not.  This is r.s.f.p.; I
might well be ostracized if I could back *anything* up with facts.

>It would be interesting to see a breakdown like:
>Yards   Attempts   Completions
>1 -10
>10-20
>20-40
>etc..

This would indeed be interesting.  To make a case for or against my
assertion, however, you'd have to break down attempts by "yardage in
the air", so that a five yard toss that Michael Irvin ran for another
fifty yards doesn't get counted as a fifty-five yard completion.

>Right now, I can't say he is better or worse than average in the area of
>the long ball.

Probably so.  And, as I say, even if my observation has merit, it isn't
very damning against him anyway.  Just something I've noticed.  Whenever I
see him launch a long one, I expect to see a defensive back break it up.


					Al
					alan@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes)
Subject: Re: a billboard in houston
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 03:44:50 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard NARC Atlanta
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1.3 PL5

Only Houston fans would count injuries 9sad,, very sad)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: 187701458@vill.edu
Subject: Re: Raiders vs. Redskins (CBS' unprofessionalism)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Organization: Villanova University
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 23:24:00 GMT

In article <1992Dec28.195823.10761@ttsi.lonestar.org>, hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org (Huett Bishop) writes...
>In article <29710129@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM> garyr@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM (Gary Rosen) writes:
>>>(james e kist) /  3:59 pm  Dec 26, 1992 /
>>>After Washington's touchdown that put them in the lead 20-14 in the fourth
>>>quarter, CBS displayed the words to "Hail to the Redskins" while the
>>>Redskins' marching band played the song. I thought that NFL football
>>>coverage was supposed to be unbiased. I guess I was wrong. This was a very
>>>unprofessional move by CBS.


	I found this to be unprofessional too. I was wondering if it was
some kind of mistake.

	hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org writes........
> 
>Unbiased? HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
> 
>Just watch Monday Night Football's pre-game, it is very easy to see which
>team Frank, Al, and Dan want to win.
> 
>When the Cowboys played Philly (game 2) these guys were sucking butt on
>Phila. so hard I thought Randall C's eyes would implode, every play that
>the Cowboys made error on or Phila did well, was commented on with something
>like " well these Cowboys appear to have folded their tents or they are
>just not as good as their record etc" Then the Boys started kicking some
>butt and man did the announcers scramble to praise the Cowboys.
> 

	Now, if you are talking about the Monday night game between the
Birds and the Cowboys, it was Game 4 of this season for both. I agree that
the Commentators were pretty excited about Phillys prospects. I remember one
of them saying that if Philly could win that game it could be a Super Bowl
contender or something to that effect. But I think that was their enthusiasm
showing, after all the Eagles rode into this game with a 3 game roll which
included a shutout of the Denver Broncos (30 -0) and this was a big game for
Philly after the last meeting with the Boys at the Vet, Walker wearing an
Eagle uniform and all that.

	After the game started, the announcers were obviously marvelling at
the superior play of the Birds. The early mad rush of the Minister of
Defense at Aikman when the latter was penalized for intentional grounding, the 
holes Walker rushed through etc. The Cowboys kicking butt in that game?
Hardly. Final score 31 - 7. 


>three lines deleted 
>+--------------------------------------+
>|Huett Bishop                          |
>| Tandem Telecommuncations Systems Inc.|
>|Dallas, TX                            |
>|                                      |
>|Go Cowboys!!                          |
>|                                      |
>|email: hbishop@ttsi.lonestar.org      |
>+--------------------------------------+



		Jagdeep Sahni
		A Hard Hitting, Trash Talking, Philadelphia Eagles Fan
		Herbert, watch out for Gang Green!!!
From: rx84335@mcvax4.d48.lilly.com (BENVENGA MARK J)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Playoff Coverage?
Date: 22 Dec 92 13:11:00 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Lilly Research Laboratories
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    Lines: 16

In article <sfBhjye00WDKI7QH5T@andrew.cmu.edu>, Vernon H Harmon <vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes...
>Tonight, during the MNF game, I saw that ABC will be covering
>some of the playoff games. Does anybody know which ones?
>Does this mean we get to look forward to more of the Monday
>Night Morons? Which network covers the Super Bowl this
>year?

Just like last year, ABC will cover the 2 games on the first
Wild Card day.

Yes, morons will be in full view.

I think it's NBC.

> 
>--Vernon.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Hey Ed Lor, Bills 4-0 vs NFC, one more NFC team to beat
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:23:13 GMT

In article <BzLBCD.A1q@acsu.buffalo.edu> v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:
>Well, I think this is perhaps the biggest win of the season
>for the Bills because they showed the nation what type of
>team they were.  
Don't worry, the Bills have already shown the nation what type
of team they were in the past two Januarys.

Biggest win of the season is an interconference game in the regular
season? It's like somebody saying that the Eagles have already played
their SB on Oct. 5, did the Bills play theirs yesterday?

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com