HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Request anecdotal data on DTC-3280.
Date: 7 Jan 93 04:34:28 GMT
Organization: St. Peter's College, US

In article <1993Jan6.230814.1405@ncsa.uiuc.edu>, benz@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Benjamin R. Zaborowsky) writes:
> I can't comment on much of what Terry said, but I can relate my own
> experiences with DTC.  Recently I needed some technical information on
> the DTC-3280 card.  I faxed them a request early in the morning, received
> a phone call at noon makin sure I was asking for the correct information,
> and received 14 pages of faxed material that same afternoon.  DTC does
> have a BBS and a very responsive sys op.  Both the BBS number and technical
> support numbers are published in the manuals and installation guide.  They
> too have an automated FAX service if you want pre-canned stuff.  I have
> to agree about Adaptec - getting to a human being is tough.  The last
> time I talked to them it took about 10 calls and two weeks to make
> contact.  In their defense I must say that once contact was made, they
> were very friendly and helpful.

  They may be helpful once you reach them, but reaching them proved to be too
difficult for me. I knew they used to have a BBS, and in fact had spoken to
them in years past and they were indeed quite helpful. Thus, I stated in pri-
vate mail that they had a BBS and were helpful (hi Steve!).

  Unfortunately, I then tried to find them. Neither the tri-folded "cheat
sheet" nor the full manual for the 3280's I had had an address or phone num-
ber in them. The old contact info I had (from 1984) was no longer valid
(vanished - left no forwarding info 8-) and I could not track them down via
Directory Assistance. Looking at the board (an obvious import from the Orient)
I assumed they had sailed off into the sunrise...

  If you have the phone numbers for sales, tech support, and the BBS I'm sure
a lot of folks here would be interested.

	Terry Kennedy		Operations Manager, Academic Computing
	terry@spcvxa.bitnet	St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA
	terry@spcvxa.spc.edu	+1 201 915 9381
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.sun.misc
From: olson@anchor.esd.sgi.com (Dave Olson)
Subject: Re: DATs and DAT tape prices
Organization:  Silicon Graphics, Inc.  Mountain View, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 93 05:12:05 GMT

In <1993Jan7.190333.3952@zia.aoc.nrao.edu> rmilner@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (Ruth Milner) writes:
|     1. How long is a filemark (in terms of data capacity)? Does the length of 
|        the filemark introduce any positioning restrictions?

4 bytes.  Yes, 4 bytes, that isn't a typo.

|     2. How many times does a DAT retry a read before reporting a media error?

Varies tremendously from drive to drive.  It can usually be set by
modeselect also.

|     3. Does a DAT, like an Exabyte, rewrite data when it detects an error in
|        data it has just written? Can it detect such errors in the first place?

Like an Exabyte, it rewrites the data further down the tape.

|     4. Is there the same kind of ongoing discussion about the merits of data-
|        grade and the demerits of consumer-grade tape? And if so, are there any
|        real conclusions? :-)

Yes, here and in other groups, with about the same results, some positive,
some negative.
--
Let no one tell me that silence gives consent,  |   Dave Olson
because whoever is silent dissents.             |   Silicon Graphics, Inc.
    Maria Isabel Barreno                        |   olson@sgi.com
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: ulrich@tpki.toppoint.de (Ulrich Gall)
Subject: Tape Streamer software DOA and MAC data exchange
Organization: Toppoint Mailbox e.V.
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 17:46:09 GMT


Hi,


I am desperately looking for a way to transfer data (2 GB per
day) between a DOS PC and a Mac.

I heard that FASTBACK+with EXABYTE tapes works fine, but
unfortunately, it does not support te Adaptec AHA 1542 which we
use.

Is there a way to read SYTOS tapes on the MAC? Is there a TAR
for the Mac that can read tapes created by ASPITAR for DOS?

Does anyone know of another program that would work?

Please reply via EMail, I'll summarize.

Thanks in advance,


Ulrich
-- 
Ulrich Gall		ulrich@tpki.toppoint.de
2300 Klausdorf
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: jimlynch@netcom.com (Jim Lynch)
Subject: Need price/value info...
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 22:23:53 GMT

I need to know what a ClubMac 44 meg SyQuest drive is worth on the
net...
Xref: sparky comp.periphs.scsi:6342 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:34795
From: terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Request anecdotal data on DTC-3280.
Date: 5 Jan 93 09:00:25 GMT
Organization: St. Peter's College, US

In article <1iaggeINN5n1@fido.asd.sgi.com>, autry@magellan.stlouis.sgi.com (Larry Autry) writes:
> What kind of scsi controller is this with regard to support and product
> quality?  I am looking at purchasing the best controller for the least 
> money (isn't everyone?) and the price of this board suits me.  

  I just refurbished two systems that had these in them. Note that the ones
I had were marked "preliminary" on both the board and the documentation, so
they may have improved a bit.

  First, they aren't well-supported beyond the drivers that DTC supplies.
If you are going to ever run a Unix such as BSDI's or the Jolitz version,
you're going to have to do your own driver. The DTC boards seem to run a
distant Nth behind Adaptec (#1 in popularity) and Future Domain (probably
#2). If this is the case, you probably want to look at Adaptec (or BusTek,
a reimplementation of the Adaptec board with some enhanced features) or
Future Domain.

  Second, the supplied software was pretty abysmal. Again, this may have
been fixed since the preliminary versions. The board lacks most on-board
utilities found in the Adaptec/BusTek as well.

  Third, the board isn't bus mastering. I'm not even sure it's DMA.

  Fourth, DTC is hard to get a hold of. They don't supply a phone number
in their manuals, and I don't believe they operate a BBS. Adaptec's phone
number is listed, but you may have trouble getting through, and you may
get someone who is, well, "underqualified" to help you. At least they have
a BBS. BusTek tech support was very helpful and sent out free ROMs and man-
uals (with Adaptec you pay... and pay...). Future Domain was a mixed bag.
The first time I got a total flunky. The second time I got one of the board
designers. With Future Domain you also pay. But just once - if it still
doesn't work, they'll send free updates until they fix it. Adaptec just seems
to want to sell you updates without admitting if they fix the problem. It
seems they'd just like you to go away. Any of this is better than DTC, who
I haven't been able to contact.

  DTC used to be one of the big players in SASI and early SCSI. They just
seem to have run out of steam. They had a very popular controller, the 5150BX,
for the PC which was internally SCSI although it implemented the IBM hard
disk register set externally. They sold lots of them, and eventually they
sold the rights to NCL (a Japanese company. I believe it was National Com-
puters Ltd. If so, it was likely the same "National" that Panasonic is known
by inside Japan). After that they just sort of muddled along, doing their
own version of the 5150BX using standard logic arrays (a really weird board).

  Since then they've kept a pretty low profile.

	Terry Kennedy		Operations Manager, Academic Computing
	terry@spcvxa.bitnet	St. Peter's College, Jersey City, NJ USA
	terry@spcvxa.spc.edu	+1 201 915 9381
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.periphs
From: kamil@alumni.cs.colorado.edu (Kamil Maheshwari)
Subject: ASPI (compatible) driver for Adaptec's SDS series boards??
Keywords: ASPI, SCSI, Adaptec, Backup
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 17:18:00 GMT



------------------------------------------------------------------

	Hi y'all,

	I am in dire need of some help and advise. I (and many
	others here) have SDS series Adaptec boards. Usually
	these boards are for SCSI testing and development purposes
	but I would also like to use it as a possible host
	adapter for some SCSI devices. For now, I only need it
	to work with sequential SCSI Tape drives for backup purposes.

Question:Does anyone out there have or know if there is an ASPI
	compatible driver written for these boards? What other
	cheap solutions can I use for a local PC backup onto a
	SCSI tape drives?

Requirement:Should be cheap and should work on 386/486 PC's.

Please, please, respond to me at kamil@alumni.cs.colorado.edu
and I'll post the summary.	 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Thanks a bunch and have a good one.
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: JVC XR-W1001 info needed
Date: 6 Jan 93 09:43:38 GMT
Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA


	Does anyone have any info on the JVC XR-W1001 CDROM-writer (worm)?
It appears that if you do a write, you can't write to the block following the
write (or some such).  The manual is absolutely no help.

-- 
GNU Emacs is a LISP operating system disguised as a word processor.
 - Doug Mohney, in comp.arch

Randell Jesup, Jack-of-quite-a-few-trades, Commodore Engineering.
jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com  BIX: rjesup  
Disclaimer: Nothing I say is anything other than my personal opinion.
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: timhu@ico.isc.com (Timothy Hu)
Subject: Re: ASPI API specs
Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Boulder CO
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 00:59:12 GMT

You can call Adaptec's BBS (you can call them to get the BBS number). It
is free for the downloading.
-- 
Timothy Hu timhu@ico.isc.com	 | The intelligence (or lack of) expressed
Interactive Systems Corporation  | above does not necessarily reflect the
Resource Solutions International | that of anyone else.
From: etxjvo@eos.ericsson.se (Jari Vuorio)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: This is a test. (sorry).
Date: 4 Jan 93 07:37:33 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Telecom AB

This is a test.
From: tommy@taichung (Tommy Hsieh)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: How to change the default reading block of SUN CD PLAYER?
Date: 5 Jan 1993 18:35:49 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc., Mountain View, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: taichung
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Hi,
	Does anybody out there know how to change the default data reading
block from 512K bytes to 2048K bytes on SUN CD PLAYER ?  Thanks.

-tommy
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: ddavis@highlite.uucp (Darrel L. Davis)
Subject: Help with unknow model drive
Summary: Need help determining drive model
Keywords: hard disk
Organization: Gotham Communications Research
Distribution: comp
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 13:59:41 GMT


I received a drive from work this week with, unfortunately, no docs.  I was going to get specs from teh Seagate BBS (Iwas told it's a seagate) but the model isn't on their BBS.  The model no. is 97536TY.  There is no manufaturer id plate onthe drive.

Can someone help?  Ever heard of the drive model?  It's supposed to be a 300MB
SCSI drive.  Any help is appreciated.

-> Darrel <-
 

-- 

Darrel L. Davis:  ddavis@gotham.com  ddavis@highlite.uucp  uunet!highlite!ddavis
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: neese@adaptx1.UUCP (Roy Neese)
Subject: Re: Archive Python DAT question (problem?)
Organization: Adaptec Inc., Texas
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 20:03:49 GMT

In article <1993Jan3.201029.837@tware.com> bash@tware.com (Paul Bash) writes:
> 
> I just bought one of these drives and have a question. It appears that
> unless a tape is inserted in the drive at boot time (on a 486-33 running
> MSDOS), the controller (an Adaptec 1542B) will not recognize that the
> unit exists. I verified this using Roy's SCSICNTL program and having it
> list the available devices. If a tape is in the drive at boot time, 
> SCSICNTL lists it as an available device. If no tape is in the drive,   
> SCSICNTL doesn't "see" it. 

This is normal.  A tape drive will respond "not ready" unless a tape is
loaded in the drive.  SCSICNTL was written to allow users to muck with
the mode pages of a SCSI device.  Tape drives cannot store this
information so I didn't bother spending a lot of time on tape devices.
The only tape command available, under SCSICNTL, is erase and for that
option you must have a tape loaded, so call it a feature/bug or call me
lazy.
---

			Roy Neese
			Adaptec Senior UNIX/SCSI Software Engineer
			UUCP:	convex!egsner!adaptex!neese
			Inet:	neese%adaptex@cirr.com
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: frigault@gla.ecoledoc.ibp.fr (Laurent FRIGAULT)
Subject: Specifications of wd7000
Keywords: wd7000 specifications drivers
Reply-To: frigault@gla.ecoledoc.ibp.fr (Laurent FRIGAULT)
Organization: Dess GLA Universite PARIS 6
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 08:14:54 GMT



	I'm looking for the programming specifications of the WD7000 Fasst 2
SCSI adapter in order use the gnu tar with it, since nobody seems to
have done it.



	Regards



*********************************************

Laurent FRIGAULT

Universite Pierre & Marie Curie Paris 6
DESS de Genie des Logiciels Applicatifs

Administrateur systeme

frigault@gla.ecoledoc.ibp.fr

*********************************************
From: wb8foz@skybridge.SCL.CWRU.Edu (David Lesher)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: model # differences....
Date: 10 Jan 1993 01:22:44 GMT
Organization: NRK Clinic for habitual NetNews abusers - Beltway Annex
Reply-To: wb8foz@skybridge.scl.cwru.edu (David Lesher)
NNTP-Posting-Host: skybridge.scl.cwru.edu

I've been calling & getting quotes on stuff. One can never be sure if
the folks are telling the hole [vs electron] truth, but if they
are.....
	What's the difference between:
	Fuji 2624FS, 2624FA, and ?STM2624T? <this last one
					     sounds bogus...>
    and
	Adaptec 5242B and 5242 "Bus Master"

and oh...
If I shouldn't be buying the above pair, what about a Toshiba 8476?

Sage advice for a scsi-newbe welcome....

--
A host is a host from coast to coast..wb8foz@skybridge.scl.cwru.edu
& no one will talk to a host that's close..........................
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
From: altitude@css.itd.umich.edu (Alexander King Tang)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: Need Value info for Drive&contoller
Date: 13 Jan 1993 04:56:05 GMT
Organization: University of Michigan - ITD Consulting and Support
NNTP-Posting-Host: uglymouse.css.itd.umich.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]

I've also found out that the 1660 Future Domain card is a CAM card and
that Future domain is producing something called SCSI WORKS, which is supposed
to allow ASPI drivers to work on this card. 
Could anyone tell me if this is a good or bad thing?

--
						...Alex...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Alex Tang, U of M School of Natural Resources and Environment Student. |
|                            CSS/ITD Consultant.			  |
|USERW00Y@UMICHUM.BITNET {BITNET}     |     ALTITUDE@UMICH.EDU  {INTERNET}|
|   Either we are alone in the Universe, or we are not...		  |
|				Both concepts are incredible.		  |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: kahn@PHYSICS.UNC.EDU (Dan Kahn)
Subject: Exabyte tape robot confusion
Organization: Physics Dept. UNC-CH
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 20:31:50 GMT

I've been trying to get an Exabyte tape robot connected to a Sparc
station to run and have become very confused about the different ways
this can be done over a SCSI bus.  I've been getting conflicting
messages about this from the vendor.

Would it be reasonable to expect a tape robot to be controlled as an
extension to the Exabyte drive ioctls that is inside the robot, or is
it impossible to extend the number of commands a
tape-drive-like-device understands without using a special driver? 

Thanks,
--dan
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: gregv@gdstech.grumman.com (Greg Vilardi)
Subject: Optical Jukeboxes: Another Request for info...
Summary: Need an RS6000 interface.
Reply-To: gregv@gdstech.grumman.com (Greg Vilardi)
Organization: Grumman Data Systems-Woodbury
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 15:11:11 GMT

	I am trying to get information for a friend of mine here at Grumman
who wants to attach a 6GigaByte or larger Optical Jukebox to an existing 
RS6000 platform running AIX.  He has talked to the people at Pinnacle about 
their product, but they do not have an interface or software for the RS6000.

	If anyone has information about where we might be able to purchase
such a beast, please E-mail me, or post here.  I'm not a normal reader of
this group, but I will monitor it for a few days to see if there is any 
response.  

	One final note, If you happen to know of a product that does _not_
have a SCSI interface, that might also be an acceptable solution.  

Again many thanks for any information you can give me.

	-Greg

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Vilardi                       (516) 575-9696 8:30AM to 5:00PM EST
Associate Research Engineer        gregv@gdstech.grumman.com
Grumman Corporate Research Center  Note: The above message dose not imply
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith)
Subject: SCSI controller TMC1660ER, Rodime RO3259T (210Mb drive):comments?
Organization: (this space for rent)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 16:20:02 GMT

A place in computer shopper is selling new Rodime drives (RO3259T, 210Mb,
18ms, SCSI) for $299, and they are selling a 16 bit SCSI hard only controller
(Future Domain TMC1660ER) for $49.

Does anyone out there have any experience with this drive or controller or
both?  (In my case it would only be used for DOS, not Unix or OS-2, etc).
What is the transfer rate of this controller, and would it be faster than
Seagate's ST-01/02 SCSI (8 bit) pass-through controller? (I've had CORE and
Spinrite II tell me that an ST-02/ST296N combination gives about 450 k/sec
transfer rate.  I would hope that this TMC1660ER would give at least 600 to
800 k/sec transfer rate).  And would this TMC1660ER controller conflict with
an IDE hard/floppy/IO card (with the hard controller disabled)?
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
From: milton@teal.csn.org (Milton Scritsmier)
Subject: Re: CAM
Organization: Colorado SuperNet, Inc.
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 03:14:19 GMT

In article <1993Jan5.190745.18381@decvax.dec.com> jag@zk3.dec.com writes:
>
>    Using a SCSI bus RESET, must be the last resort !  At a minimum it
>can not be used as a valid error recovery for detecting a bus RESET :-).
>There is a lot of code out there that have a bus RESET as part of the 
>general purpose error recovery code.
>
>>It seems to me that if an initiator in a system designed for multiple
>>initiators cannot do something similar, it has no business being
>>in that system. No doubt that's just wishful thinking...
>
>    It is very unfortunate that the real world exists out there.  From 
>the SCSI hardware; that's bus signals, ID #s, and phases; there can be
>multiple systems on the SCSI bus.  This is *totally* a software problem,
>I am including HBA firmware in this distinction.  There is nothing
>stopping J-random user from trying to attach his two PCs onto the same
>SCSI bus to share a printer or tape drive.  Oh well: "Fools go ....."

I agree that a hard reset should be the last resort. As far as disk
firmware goes, I can tell you a lot of horror stories. One disk vendor
we dealt with had a boot prom which went into "deep reset" if it saw
two resets within a certain amount of time. While it was in deep reset
the drive was totally unresponsive to selection. Other problems I've seen
with SCSI resets with another vendor included getting lost if RESET was
held too long on the SCSI bus, failing to respond to selection within
250 ms after the end of the RESET, and getting lost if selected too soon
(soon being 20 seconds after the RESET ended). These where top-of-the-line
drives from vendors with good reputations.

When I asked the firmware developers about it their responses indicated
that they had made implicit assumptions that the drive would always be
in a single initiator environment, would only see resets near power-on,
and would have 30 seconds or so after power-on or reset before the
initiator selected the drive for the first time. Thus while the firmware
developers got the obvious multiple commands from multiple initiator
stuff right, they missed more subtle things.

Xref: sparky comp.periphs.scsi:6448 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:35581
From: monfreda@urz.unibas.ch
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: HELP !! Adaptec 1542 to slooow
Date: 12 Jan 93 15:28:39 MET
Organization: University of Basel, Switzerland

From: THOGER@bg1.hbg.hydro.no (Terje Thoegersen)

>In <1993Jan11.123748.42656@urz.unibas.ch> monfreda@urz.unibas.ch writes:

>> Hi,
>> I have a 486 with a noname SCSI Host who has a Future Domain chip on it, 
>> and was getting (measured with Checkit 3.0) a transferrate of about 330
>> KBytes/sec (This is too sloooow). I'm now trying to install an Adaptec 
>> 1542b SCSI-Host on my 486. The two HD's connected are a Seagate ST1239N 
>> and a Maxtor 7120SR. I tried several combinations of IRQ, DMA channel 
>> and other settings on the board. But the max. transferrate is 460 KBytes/sec.
>> This is not a software problem, I think.
>>  
>> The motherboard is a UM486 (33MHz), and has a UMC chipset, and a AMI BIOS 
>> dated 7/7/91.
>> 

>Hi!

>I don't know if this is you problem, but MS' smartdrv.exe installed in
>config.sys with the /double_buffer option pulled the transfer rate on
>my Bustek BT-742 from ~1300 down to about 350k. Installing the BTSCSI.SYS
>instead (ASPI4DOS.SYS in your case) brought the rate back up again. This 
>also cures the problem smartdrv /double_buffer was supposed to fix.

>Regards,
  -Terje

>-------------------------------------------------------------
>Terje Thoegersen    Norsk Hydro    Hydro Data    Oslo, Norway
>

Thankyou for Answering,
But I haven't installed any cache program, and it's the about the same 
when I boot from a clear floppy (only command.com).
The strange thing is that Checkit (3.0) does not recognize the DMA-channel
of the card.
I first thought it was a motherboard problem, but I get about the same 
result on a AT-286. Now don't unterstand anything. I realy NEED some HELP !! 

Thanks, 

******
Massimo Monfreda, Institut fr Physik der Universitt Basel (Switzerland)

   ==>> monfreda@phys.unibas.ch
From: wilko@russia.idca.tds.philips.nl (Wilko Bulte)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: 30Mb tape -- why not working?
Date: 5 Jan 93 08:17:58 GMT

pi@cs.sun.ac.za (Pieter Immelman) writes:

>I recently obtained some 30Mb tapes (just great for semi-backups), but
>have found that they don't want to work for some or other strange
>reason.  I have successfully used 60Mb tapes before (read and write) in
>my 525Mb SCSI tape drive.  This 30Mb tapes looks exactly like the 60Mb
>tapes; only difference is the sticker which says something like
>D(C?)300(A?).  The tape size is exactly the same as the "normal"
>QIC150/QIC250/QIC525 tapes.  Why does these tapes refuse to work?  Any
>way that I can make these tapes work?

Quite simple: your tape drive simply refuses to write to them. And they 
look the same to you, but for the drive they are distinguishable by
a different distance between a number of holes punched (yes, punched)
a the start of the tape.

The 60 Mb tapes have a different punch pattern.

Hope this helps

Wilko


--
 |   / o / /  _   Wilko Bulte               Domain: wilko@idca.tds.philips.nl
 |/|/ / / /( (_)  EasyNet: HLDE01::BULTE_W  uucp  : [mcsun,sun4nl]!philapd!wilko
|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|  Equipment  Enterprise  -  IISS/SE   voice: +3155-432372
fax: +3155-432103 DTN: 829 2372 PO Box 245 - 7300 AE Apeldoorn - The Netherlands
Xref: sparky comp.periphs.scsi:6429 comp.sys.sun.wanted:2143