HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dollens@equinox.unr.edu (C Blake Dollens)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Your Favorite Cameo Appearance in a Film
Date: 2 Oct 92 00:48:16 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Nevada, Reno

In article <1992Sep25.173606.21132@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> jmb@athens.uucp (22242-bennett) writes:
>Gene Hackman as the Blind Man in "Young Frankenstein"
>I watch that scene everytime it's on TV.

That is a good one.  And you just reminded me of another one:

John Hurt in "Spaceballs."  ("Oh no, not again!")

-- 
"That's All"            | "Fundamentally, every bar is the same as every other
  -Phil, Mike, and Tony |  one, if it's the kind you're drinking in, to end a
Blake Dollens           |  sentence with a preposition, which I haven't."
dollens@equinox.unr.edu |                            -Walter Slovotsky
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dtschett@scott.skidmore.edu (donna tschetter)
Subject: Re: Last of the Mohicens
Organization: Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs NY
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:05:36 GMT

The movie was beautiful and the lack of emotion in Daniel Day Lewis in
the attack scenes was a wonderful counterpoint to the tenderness he
showed towards his lady.

Great movie!
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:28932 rec.arts.sf.movies:7513 alt.cult-movies:8418
From: mlh@eddy.austin.ibm.com (Mike Haskell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Deckard as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Date: 25 Sep 92 21:08:48 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <iroderic.717353429@cunews> iroderic@alfred.carleton.ca (Ian Roderick) writes:
>In <5929@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner) writes:
>
>>From article <1992Sep22.185912.25742@cbnewse.cb.att.com>, by gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart):
>
>>> Secondly, there was no way to tell if Dekkard (sp?) wasn't better
>>> both physically and mentally than the average human.  It may be
>>> that he was a physical "C" and mental "B" replicant -- just enough
>>> to be a very good bladerunner
>
>>He is not a very good bladerunner.  Exactly my point.  He's a bad one,
>>i.e., too bad to have been intended for the job.  Roy, Zhora, Leon,
>>and even Pris had finished him off if he hadn't been lucky.
>
>Yes, I think Markus has it right here.  IMHO, given BR draws so much
>upon the post WWII film noir/detective genre, Dekkard (I don't think
>that looks right) is a "plodder".  It is not a special skill or talent
>which allows him to retire replicants but rather simple tenacity.  In
>this way he is very much in keeping with the protagonists of Dashiell
>Hammett.
>

Why then does the police chief tell Gant that "he could learn a lot from
this guy" if all he does is plod a long?  Most importantly WHY is Gant
following him around?  I certianly don't think it is to learn anything
from Dekkard.  If anything there is a sense of animosity or at least
tension between the two.
From: jxxl@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Beverly Hillbillies: The Movie!
Date: 5 Oct 92 22:28:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: huxley.6498
Distribution: usa
Organization: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA

bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole) writes:

> Let's create our own dream cast, and see how close it is to the real one...

Jed - Gregory Peck
Granny - Jessica Tandy
Elly Mae - Goldie Hawn
Jethro - Arnold Schwarznegger
Mr. Drysdale - Richard Dreyfus
Mrs. Drysdale - Bette Midler
Miss Jane - Sandra Barnhard

As usual, I'll be playing myself,
John
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble)
Subject: Re: Die Hard VHS
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 03:42:40 GMT
Organization: Mr. Lazlo's Temple Of The Mighty Rude-Boy Skank

you@ems.cdc.com writes:

> I wish letterbox, even the Laser Disk is not LBX yet. Hope its soon for
> Die Hard in LBX on Laser Disk. 

Not only is the _Die Hard_ laserdisc available letterboxed in the US,
that's the *only* laserdisc version of _Die Hard_ in the US.  (Ditto for
_Die Hard 2_.) 

--
Lazlo (lazlo@triton.unm.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: med50003@nusunix1.nus.sg (WANSAICHEONG KHIN-LIN)
Subject: Re: My Own Private Idaho
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 03:49:33 GMT

Curious thought : Did those who like Barton Fink find this interesting?
I watched BF and it took me a long time to get through. The good thing
was that these movies do not end neatly (some would argue they do not
end at all...) and having watched one made me amenable to watching a
second film with a similar ending. 

Thing is, I used to hate films like this - couldn't stand not knowing.
Perhaps its old age....

gervais
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: c60a-lc@danube.Berkeley.EDU (Chris Silva)
Subject: More questions...help
Organization: University of California, at Berkeley
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 21:56:28 GMT

More questions that I need answered.....

1)  This 1951 kinder and gentler alien-visitation drama is based on
    "Farewell to the Master" by Harry Bates.  Name the movie.

2)  Who is Bernard Shakey and what is his connection to rock movies?

3)  Woody originally envisioned this smart-allecy actor - now famous
    for one of this year's big sequels - for the Jeff Daniels role
    in 1985's "The Purple Rose of Cairo."

4)  In the 1935 baseball comedy, "Alibi Ike", star pitcher Joe E.
    Brown twice makes a dramatic entrance into a baseball park.
    How does he do it?

5)  This character actor, who rose to fame in "Nashville", makes
    a cameo as the man on the other cross battling for a parking
    spot in Fielding Mellish's ego dream in "Bananas".

and the killer, again.....

6)  What respected singer-songwriter appears on the soundtrack
    album of the Band's Last Waltz, but not in the film?

Again, all comments/answers/flames/questions should be addressed to
c60a-lc@danube.berkeley.edu.

A summary of responses will be posted to the net in about a week.

Chris Silva
From: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: some previews & mini-
Date: 30 Sep 92 07:21:19 EST
Reply-To: "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Channel 1 Communications

AM>_Husbands & Wives_
AM> What can I say? Woody's latest and it's his best since _Hanna and her Sister
AM>Honest. The timing couldn't be worse but the film survives. However poised to

     As far as TriStar is concerned, the timing couldn't be better.
     Nothing like a good controversy to get audiences to spend their
     hard-earned bucks on a movie - in fact, I've heard a few people
     say that Woody planned this whole "scandal" thing as a publicity
     stunt for the movie.
---
  SLMR 2.1a  ...all for a children's crusade...
--
Channel 1 (R)   Cambridge, MA

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rjn@FC.HP.COM (Bob Niland)
Subject: Re: Robert Vaughn--any good?
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 14:49:55 GMT
Reply-To: rjn@FC.HP.COM
Organization: Hewlett-Packard/WSY Ft.Collins,CO,USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.3 PL6]

>> I saw Robert Vaughn in a pretty good role once. It was a western, and
>> he played a gunfighter who was losing his nerve. Can't remember the
>> name of the movie, but he was good.

> Maybe the fact that his movies are forgettable is part of the
> explanation.

The movie was "The Magnificent Seven" (the most requested title on broadcast
TV, according to TV stations).  Vaughn's part was a small supporting role.

His principal problem is that he is miscast as leading man.  He is much more
convincing as a heavy, like the slimy politician he played in "Bullitt" with
McQueen.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: cosc17wj@Rosie.UH.EDU (Periscope)
Subject: Re: THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS (review)
Reply-To: cosc17wj@Rosie.UH.EDU
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 04:03:18 GMT

I thought this was a pretty good movie.  I agree that the movie looked and
sounded great.  The scenery shots and the battle scenes were amazing.  This
movie is worth seeing for the visuals alone.

What I really liked about the subtitling was when the British officer is 
translating for Hawkeye, while the audience is seeing the words.  Neat effect,
IMO.

I do not think this is one of the year's  best, however.  UNFORGIVEN and THE
PLAYER are still the best of the year, IMO.

-Scope
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: MHART00@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU (mason hart)
Subject: Re: cartoon violence
Organization: Rice University  
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 04:02:59 GMT

In article <3551@creatures.cs.vt.edu>
debra@creatures.cs.vt.edu (Debra Potts) writes:
 
>I'm not saying 'everything then GOOD, everything now BAD,' but I cannot
>help but wonder why we, kids, didn't appear to be all that violent as a whole
>back then, even with the oh-so-destructive forces of bugs bunny and road runner
>to corrupt our minds, but today children OVERALL seems to have increasing
>levels of agression and hostility, even though their cartoons are supposedly]
>much lower in overt violence.
>
>Perhaps it is just that we live in a more violent, hostile society overall,
>and cartoons have absolutely nothing to do with it either way.  In that case,
>GIVE US BACK THE ROAD RUNNER ON SATURDAY MORNING!  (and how bout Sylvester and
>Tweety and Daffy and Tom & Jerry and George the Dog while you're at it?)
>
>comments....?
 
Quite possibly those silly, pseudo-violent Saturday morning cartoons
were a vent for the perfectly human need to see violence expressed.
We, as children, satisfied that need by watching Wile E. Coyote and
Yosemite Sam fall into ravines.  Today's children, forced to settle
for frustratingly less, eventually turn from their TV's to draw and
quarter the cat in the backyard.
 
How's that for delightful irony?  The very act of sheltering the
kiddies from violence is what leads them to explore it independently.
Be wonderful if it was true ...
 
"Life IS pain.  Anyone who tells you differently is selling something."
-- mason hart, rice u.
-- warning: I am not a very good person.
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:28967 rec.arts.sf.movies:7526 alt.cult-movies:8431 rec.video.releases:3001
From: shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies,rec.video.releases
Subject: Re: Deckard as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Date: 28 Sep 92 15:03:08 GMT
Reply-To: shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.

In article <1992Sep26.235103.11611@midway.uchicago.edu>, ttak@quads.uchicago.edu (toki  takeuchi) writes:
|> The fact that Edward James Olmos (Walsh?) new about Deckard's
|> unicorn dream supports the idea of Deckard being a replicant.

Maybe he is psychic or has worked with him long enough to know his thoughts.

|> The thing that contradicts this idea is the part where Deckard
|> is confronted by the second male replicant (that is killed by
|> Rachel).  He didn't have superior phyical power that replicants are
|> expected to have.

* EXCUSE ME * !! Have you actually watched the movie ? The second male
replciant that Rachel kills is Leon. When Leon first grabs Deckard,
Deckard tries hitting him with his fist - Leon is unaffected. Then 
Leon starts throwing Deckard around like a rag doll - Deckard is
powerless to do anything. It is Rachel's intervention that prevents
Leon from killing Deckard. I'd say Leon's superior strength is amply
demonstarted in that scene. Try watching it again !

|> The sad thing about this story is that if Deckard is a replicant,
|> he and Rachel are going to have a short lived relationship.  Four
|> years was it?

You haven't watched it have you ! Rachel was an experiment - she was not
designed like the others with a 4 years lifespan , so no one, not even
tje cops know how long she will live.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: greg@ctpm.uq.oz.au (Greg Hall)
Subject: Re: Reuse of Music in Film Trailers (was: Danny Elfman)
Organization: Centre for Language Teaching and Research, Uni of Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
Date:  4 Oct 92 22:52:55 GMT

levin@bbn.com (Joel B Levin) writes:

>In article <1aevptINNsch@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cb366@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark B. Bendiksen) writes:
>>
>>Since scoring a film is one of the last steps before release,
>>studios often add scores from other films for the trailers
>>and even some early commercials.

>My favorite example:  this summer, I saw ads for the recent vampire
>movie which featured Meryl Streep (I forget the name).  I was amused
>to note, even as they flashed the credit for Alan Silvestri's music,
>that the score in the ad was the title theme from HBO's "Tales from
>the Crypt" -- by Danny Elfman.

>	/JBL
>=
>Nets: levin@bbn.com  |  "Earn more sessions by sleeving."
>pots: (617)873-3463  |
>              N1MNF  |                               -- Roxanne Kowalski

   Some other examples (from Australia):

     -	James Horner's score for Aliens was used in the trailers 
	for The Abyss and a movie starring Goldie Hawn called
	Deceived (or something like that). It was also used
	(surprise, surprise) in Aliens3 trailers.

     -	Brad Fiedler's score for Terminator II turned up in the
	television ads for Universal Soldier.

--
Greg Hall                            |  "Kitchens! Kitchens! Kitchens!"
Centre for Tropical Pest Management  |    - Commercial Crimestoppers   
greg@ctpm.uq.oz.au                   |      on 'The Late Show'
From: hamel@uakari.primate.wisc.edu (Ray Hamel)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Andy Garcia
Date: 5 Oct 1992 09:00:13 -0500
Organization: UW-Madison Primate Center
NNTP-Posting-Host: uakari.primate.wisc.edu


Garcia, Andy   (1957-  )
   1983   "Blue Skies Again"  (Ken)
   1983   "A Night in Heaven"  (T. J.)
   1984   "Encounters of the Deep"
   1985   "The Mean Season"  (Ray Martinez)
   1986   "8 Million Ways To Die"  (Angel)
   1987   "The Untouchables"  (George Stone)
   1988   "Stand and Deliver"  (Ramirez)
   1988   "Clinton and Nadine/Blood Money"  (Clinton Dillard)  tv
   1988   "American Roulette"  (Carlos Quintas)
   1989   "Black Rain"  (Charlie Vincent)
   1990   "Internal Affairs"  (Raymond Avila)
   1990   "The Godfather, Part III"  (Vincent Mancini)
   1990   "A Show of Force"  (Luis Angel Mora)
   1991   "Dead Again"  (Gary Baker)
   1992   "Hero"  (John Bubber)

Ray Hamel
University of Wisconsin
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: wyman@rtsg.mot.com (Mark S. Wyman)
Subject: Re: The Last of the Mohicans
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 13:28:44 GMT

ckt4x@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Curt Tsui) writes:

>Rob_Simons@mindlink.bc.ca  writes:
>> Not trying to sound _too_ immature, but AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO THOUGHT THIS
>> MOVIE SUCKED DONKEYS!!!!!????  ...just curious
>> 
>>                                                                 _ROB_

>Not at all.  My housemate and I went to see it and thought we
>were the only two who disliked it.  For the most part, the film
>was lovely to look at, but not much else.  The actors didn't so
>much "act" as posture in photogenic stances with their
>unbelievably good looking hair waving about.

Heh Heh... It DID seem like a Calvin Kleins commercial :)  The
scenery was great and the fort battle was incredibly detailed.  However,
there was as much acting by Lewis as by Stallone in Rambo III. 

>  Characters kept
>losing their respective accents so that we had no idea what
>nationality they were any longer.
This is a problem with most movies (Robin Hood being one of the worst)

Mark Wyman
From: GCTHORNE@idbsu.idbsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Sneakers
Date: 6 Oct 92 20:29:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: inet-gw-.9210061931.AA05593
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA27378; Tue, 6 Oct 92 12:34:48 -0700
X-Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA05593; Tue, 6 Oct 92 12:31:51 -0700
X-Received: from IDBSU.IDBSU.EDU by idbsu.idbsu.edu (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 4320; Tue, 06 Oct 92 13:30:33 MST
X-Received: from IDBSU (GCTHORNE) by IDBSU.IDBSU.EDU (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id 6815; Tue, 06 Oct 92 13:30:32 MST
X-To: rec.arts.movies.usenet

Subject: Re: SNEAKERS question
Date: 6 Oct 92 15:58:45 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


>I did.  After they completed one of the "things" they did, it was either
>Dan A. or River P. that said "We just pulled of history's greatest SNEAK,
>[blagh, blagh, blagh...]"  I guess it refered to what they do: they pull
>of SNEAKS, therefore...SNEAKERS.


         The original title was  " Looters ", but after the riots ...
From: jseaver@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Jason John Seaver)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Innocent Blood (minor spoilers)
Date: 2 Oct 1992 01:09:27 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <1992Oct1.160749.25713@rtsg.mot.com> baker@rtsg.mot.com (Pam Baker) writes:
>
>Innocent Blood: Brief Observations:

>The movie was funny, scarry, and overall great except for a few
>items that didn't agree with the vampire genre:  
> - Marie saw her reflection in mirrors
> - Mobster vampires died when shot in the center of the head or
>   had their heads snapped
> - Loggia didn't die when he was set on fire

	Well, why not do it that way?  It sounds to me like the start of
a positive trend:  Doing away with the silly aspects of vampirism.  I mean,
just why SHOULDN'T vampires die when shot in the head?  And why NOT allow
Marie to see herself in a mirror?  I think it would make a more interesting
movie that way.

							-Jay


Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:29166 rec.arts.sf.movies:7609 alt.cult-movies:8520
From: mlh@eddy.austin.ibm.com (Mike Haskell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Deckard as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Date: 29 Sep 92 22:20:52 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <1992Sep28.185557.1837@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov> jonke@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov (Stephen Jonke) writes:
>In article <1992Sep26.235103.11611@midway.uchicago.edu>, ttak@quads.uchicago.edu (toki  takeuchi) writes:
>> 
>> It seems to me that Deckard WAS a replicant, but not among the
>> original 6.  Probably the same generation as Rachel.
>> 
>
>....
>
>> We can then hypothesize that maybe Deckard was made as a bladerunner
>> replicant to replace the killed bladerunner, and as a more
>> effective one.
>> 
>> The thing that contradicts this idea is the part where Deckard
>> is confronted by the second male replicant (that is killed by
>> Rachel).  He didn't have superior phyical power that replicants are
>> expected to have.
>
>Hmm, but maybe Deckard could have competed, but went on the defensive
>because he presumed he couldn't (because Deckard did not know that he
>was a replicant.)  In fact, maybe they were  no longer designed to be
[stuff deleted]
>
>> 
>> The sad thing about this story is that if Deckard is a replicant,
>> he and Rachel are going to have a short lived relationship.  Four
>> years was it?
>> 
>
>An interesting thing to note is that as the audience goes from believing
>that Deckard is a man to the realization that he is a replicant, Gaff
>goes from knowing that he is a replicant to considering him a "man".
>Indeed, that is really what the audience is to realize, I think, that even
>though we now know Deckard is a replicant, he (as well as the other
>replicants) are no less a "being" then the rest.  There are strong
>correlations between the replicants plight in Blade Runner and those of
>slaves in the past, obviously, but also to the attitudes and treatment of
>homosexuals today.  In every day and age there is a group that is treated
 ^^^^^^^^^^^
Whoa, time out Steve.  I missed this message completely.  Can you explain?
I mean, when was the last time a gay person came up to you, squished your
eyeballs in their sockets, crushed your skull, and all predicated on the
statement "I want more life, fucker."  Sorry man, I didn't see this idea 
developed at all.
From: ss@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Scott Streeter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: GREEN LANTERN: The Motion Picture
Date: 26 Sep 92 19:27:50 GMT
	<1992Sep24.092136.18913@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au> <5222@balrog.ctron.com>
	<Bv5rAF.9BB@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609-2280
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu
In-reply-to: cad28526@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu's message of Fri, 25 Sep 1992 23:44:38 GMT


>basing it on the current self-aware, grey-templed Hal Jordan and the
>SFX are courtesy of Industrial Light and Magic (of the late Jim
>Henson, Frank Oz fame).

cad28526> Isn't Industrial Light and Magic more of the George Lucas
cad28526> fame rather than of Jim Henson?  I am fairly certain of this
cad28526> point but I suppose there is an outside chance that I might
cad28526> not be remembering this right.  Any support for my side out
cad28526> there?

Industrial Light and Magic was created by Lusac for the sole purpose
of creating the effects in the first Star Wars movie. After that, and
due to the succes in Star Wars, there talents were used in other
films.
--
                        Scott Streeter
                        ss@wpi.wpi.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: coleman@rocky.cs.ucla.edu (Mike Coleman)
Subject: Re: THX - "The Audience Is Listening"
Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 21:34:13 GMT

tdbear@tandon.com (Tom Barrett) writes:
|Am I the only one who gets chills up and down my spine when
|they play "The Audience Is Listening" intro?  

No, definitely not.  The rest of the THX trailers suck, but the blue box,
"Audience is listening" one is probably the best 30 seconds of film I've ever
seen.  It's almost better than sex, and frequently a lot better than the
feature it's attached to (which might explain why they don't use it so much
any more, at least in LA).

Mike
-- 
--Mike Coleman (coleman@cs.ucla.edu), Lord High Executioner of Anhedonia-----
     Q: And you program in BASIC, of course...  A: Not even at gunpoint.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: "james kewageshig" <james.kewageshig@canrem.com>
Subject: script store in holly
Reply-To: "james kewageshig" <james.kewageshig@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 5 Oct 92 18:09:37 EST

Hi all,
Can someone give me name, phone and address of the store in Hollywood
that specializes in selling scripts and rare movie items, its
been mentioned before, but of course, wasn't paying attention...

Also, any other stores that have hard-to-find movie items...
THANKS
 _________________________________________________________________________ 
|0 ___ ___  ____  ____  ____                                             0|\
|   \ \//    ||    ||    ||                James Kewageshig               |\|
|   _\//_   _||_  _||_  _||_      UUCP: james.kewageshig@canrem.uucp      |\|
|   N E T W E R K    V I I I    INET: james.kewageshig%canrem@lsuc.on.ca  |\|
|0_______________________________________________________________________0|\|
 \_________________________________________________________________________\|
---
  DeLuxe 1.25 #8086  Head of Co*& XV$# Hi This is a signature virus. Co
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dtschett@scott.skidmore.edu (donna tschetter)
Subject: Re: Movie poster Collection...
Organization: Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs NY
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 17:49:08 GMT


Looking for Ed Medeiros!!!  I cannot get the list to you--Please
e-mail me with alternative address. 

Thanks!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies