HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: steve@geohub.gcn.uoknor.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Shameless OU woof
Date: 4 Sep 92 19:31:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: constell.1992Sep4.193115.912
Reply-To: steve@geohub.gcn.uoknor.edu ()
Organization: Geosciences Computing Network/University of Oklahoma
Originator: usenet@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu

woof   (p.s.   I see a beaten Texas this year ) oh yes woof
From: rszczerb@schiller.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Rocket stuff
Date: 2 Sep 92 13:40:26 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame

In article <BILLMS.92Sep1175203@z.eecs.umich.edu> billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>In article <1992Sep1.191245.17378@news.nd.edu> rszczerb@okeefe.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba) writes:
>
>   Yea, you're right.  Michigan was pretty much the only team stupid enough
>   to kick off to Rocket twice in the same game.  Even Miami was smart enough
>   not to kick off to him after he ran one back for a TD.  Could it be that 
>   Michigan is even dumber than Miami ... it boggles the mind.
>
>You don't think that the performance against Michigan might have had anything
>to do with Miami's decision, do you Rob?  Dumb or not is a tricky issue to
>settle.  One thing is clear, though: without the Rocket Notre Dame would
>have been wiped that day.  
>

I have to admit,  ND's ofense looked pretty weak that day.  It really
looked like MU was going to win until Rocket ran that second kick-off
back.


The thing about the Miami game that was funny was that before the game
they vowed that they "don't kick away from anyone, including the Rocket".
It was nice to see that they had sense enough to alter that philosophy
in the second half.


But the ultimate in stupidity was Colorado kicking to Rocket at 
the end of the Orange Bowl.  Colorado had the game won and they
foolishly decided to punto Ismail ... and it almost cost them
the National Championship (except for a questionable clipping penalty).

... So I guess Michigans' in good company for pulling bonehead moves.

			:)	:)	:)  (lots of smiles)

		- Rob
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Kickoff classic Iowa-NCSU
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 12:58:12 CST
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
 <1992Aug25.194242.23314@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <67090@hydra.gatech.EDU>
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


In article <67090@hydra.gatech.EDU>, mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:
>And you can stop right there!  Any ACC team in the Kickoff Classic is
>going to get creamed - that is a given.  (You see - the ACC is opposed
>to this lengthening of the season through extra games.  Now they could
>just sit back and not participate, but that is passive resistance.  Instead
>the ACC schools have decided to employ active sabotage by getting stomped
>and lowering the ratings.  Yeah, that's the ticket! ;-)
>
Anti-woofing Mark?  You'll try anything to see Iowa lose. Let's Go Hawks!
--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: acdendy@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (ROGER DENDY)
Subject: Roger's Top 20--1 Sep
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date:  1 Sep 1992 18:23 EST  

Here's my PC's top-20 after the first two games:

Rank  Team	Weight
----  ----	------
1  Miami Fl	2.2	Game of the Week: 1 Miami vs. 29 Iowa
2  Washington	2.1
3  Notre Dame	2.0	Alternate Game: 23 Miss. St. vs. 24 Texas
4  Fla. St	2.0
5  Florida	1.9	Ugly Game otW:	3 Notre Dame vs. 101 Northwestern
6  Michigan	1.9
7  Texas A&M	1.9	Crummy Game otW: 72 Toledo vs. 106 Ark. St.
8  Penn St	1.9
9  Alabama	1.8
10 Syracuse	1.7	Media Bias Winner of the Week: 29 Iowa (CNN #20)
11 Nebraska	1.7
12 Clemson	1.7	Media Bias Loser of the Week: 20 California (#25)
13 Oklahoma	1.6
14 Colorado	1.6
15 Georgia	1.6
16 UCLA		1.6
17 N C State	1.6
18 Ohio St	1.5
19 Tennessee	1.5
20 California	1.5
21 BYU		1.5
22 Georgia Tech	1.5
23 Miss St	1.4
24 Texas	1.4
25 USC		1.4  (This will change, I'm sure)

Before the flames fly, a few notes:

-The rankings are based on CNN/AP consensus, and since only two games have 
been played, most of the blame here is not mine.

-The Game of the Week is the two highest ranked teams who play (simple 
enough).  This one is almost always on TeeVee.

-The Alternate Game of the Week is the next two highest teams.  This one is 
often a better matchup, and is often completely ignored by the media.

-The Ugly Game of the Week is the matchup of the highest ranked vs. the 
lowest ranked in Div I-A.  I'm not predicting scores or taking into account 
a team's tendency to (or restraint from) run up the score, I'm just picking 
the most lopsided mismatch (in Division I-A).

-The Crummy Game of the Week is the two worst teams in Division I-A which 
play each other.  Again, I'm not predicting the score, or whether or not 
the game will be close and exciting.  I'm just predicting the worst level 
of play.

-The Media Bias Winner of the Week is the team which most benefits from 
voter bias in the polls.  That is, the one whose rank in either the AP or 
CNN poll (as available to me) deviates the most from my rankings.

-The Media Bias Loser of the Week is the team which most suffers from the 
biases of the voters.

Note that I'm not saying anything about geography, here.

R Dendy
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: A&M BEATS BILL WALSH
Date: 28 Aug 92 15:24:27 GMT
Organization: University of Houston Administrative Computing
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20

In <1992Aug28.071407.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:

> I didn't see the game, it wasn't carried in my area (grrr).  I did see a
> replay of the above-mentioned play on ESPN.  I realize that I saw the play
> out of context of the game, but I wonder:
> 
> - If this play had been called correctly, would Stanford have won?
> David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu 

  Ahh, Dave, Dave, Dave.  You DO know what a can of worms you're opening, don't
you?

  Anyway, it's real hard to say.  The Cardinal would have had a first down and
better field position.  Would they have done anything with it?  Impossible to
say.  I don't remember where the ball would have been, but I'm pretty sure a
sack would have almost wrecked a field goal attempt.  And they just weren't
moving the ball much at all at that point.

  Had A&M scored on that possesion, I would be forced to say we won on a bad
call.  But they just went about 3 plays and punted.  Wal--I mean Stanford
got the ball back almost immediately.

  In short, we'll never know.  It's unclear enough for both sides to (IMO) 
honestly feel it did/didn't really affect the outcome.

(anybody notice when the announcers referred to Stenstrom as Walsh?  Talk about
one track minds)

semper fi,

Jammer Jim Miller 
Texas A&M University '89 and '91
********************************************************************************
* Aggie in Cougarland -- I just work here.				       *
* Speak for my employers?  They don't even know I exist!		       *
*"Become one with the Student Billing System. *BE* the Student Billing System."*
*             *********************************************		       *
* "Power finds its way to those who take a stand.  Stand up, Ordinary Man."    *
*      ---Rik Emmet, Gil Moore, Mark Levine: Triumph 		               *
********************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jli@bingham.utah.edu (Jianliang Li)
Subject: IOWA vs MIAMI: 27:21 
Organization: University of Utah
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 16:49:18 GMT


	IOWA will recover its last week's fumble by upsetting #1 MIAMI:

		IOWA 27 : MIAMI 21


JLI,  PSU '90
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: zuniga@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Ralph Zuniga (FREAC/CAR))
Subject: Re: Hurricanes avoiding Andrew
Organization: Florida State University Computing Center
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 02:14:07 GMT

In article <1992Aug24.203255.1671@mdd.comm.mot.com> behzad@mdd.comm.mot.com (Behzad Khamneian) writes:
>
>I was just interested in knowing where the Miami Hurricanes went to resume
>practice when Andrew was rolling into town?
>
>Just curious.
>
>Thanx,
>
>Behzad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

The Miami Hurricanes will now practice in Vero Beach,FL after their practice
field in Coral Gables was leveled by Hurricane Andrew. Come to think of it,
everything in South Dade county was leveled.
From: acdendy@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (ROGER DENDY)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Aggies 10, Cardinal 7
Date: 31 Aug 92 23:15:00 GMT
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Aug29.162635.19109@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>, gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes...
> 
>Stanford's CB's are bad.  The Aggie receivers were open all day -- if
>Granger had the passing ability of your average Pac-10 second
>stringer, TAMU would have led 17-7 in the first half.

So, you're giving up on the Rose Bowl already?

> 
> 
>--Gidi
> 

R Dendy
From: ward@spock.corp.mot.com (Edward D. Ward)
Subject: Re: 91 BlockBuster (Was Re: Bama in the polls)
Organization: Motorola
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:07:12 GMT

In article <stricher-020992175703@stayman.ocean.fsu.edu> stricher@masig.fsu.edu (Char Aznabul) writes:
>K. S. Manu wrote:
>
>> >Marty Henderson writes:
>
>> >Nebraska is a good team - but not a GREAT team - right now anyway.
>
>> Good, you are half way there. Now if you could accept the GREATness of CU...
>
>Is this the same CU that lost to Baylor last year at home?
>
>James

Yes, and the same CU which has won or tied for the Big Eight title for three
straight years while losing only 5.

Ed
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ucisbms@st.unocal.com (Bruce Sealy)
Subject: Re: College Football TV Listings
Reply-To: ucisbms@st.unocal.com
Organization: Unocal Corporate Information Services
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 18:54:54 GMT



Thanks for the listing, Chris! I only wish that I were back in the Fatherland of
Football, TEXAS, so that I could receive more than USC, UCLA, BYU and assorted San
Diego State games!!! It can get pretty irritating out here, football-wise. (And
no, I don't mean I only want to see teams from Texas on the air. They simply DO
NOT show ENOUGH football out here, college or pros. We are lucky if we get more
than a couple of pro games on any given Sunday whereas in the Mid-West we could
watch it all day long.)

One other item. Is it just me or do others find it more than a little annoying
that Norte Dame and GOD's right-hand man, Lou Holtz, are on TV so damn much!! It
is positively sickening. (I know, I know. If the network is dumb enough to sign
the contract....  We can only hope that they get put on probation!!)

      Gig Em' Aggies!!  Beat the Hell outa l.s.u.    TAMU '81' & '83'


P.S. I hope everyone takes note that I stayed out of the A&M/Stanfraud "Bad Call
     Debate"?  Hey, we won the game. What else matters!! Maybe we need should ask
     for instant replay at the college level?  AIIIIEEEEEE!!!!!!


-- 
Bruce M. Sealy                           Unocal Corporate Information Services
Phone: (714)693-6743                     5460 E. La Palma Ave.
Internet: ucisbms@st.unocal.COM          Anaheim Hills, Ca 92807
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (Njan)
Subject: Re: 91 BlockBuster (Was Re: Bama in the polls)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 22:07:27 GMT

In article <1992Aug26.191236.330@cs.ucf.edu> tech@cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini) writes:
>
>Just goes to show how lame the buffs are if they only have 4 downs to
>do something..... 

Say something original for a change... *Yawn*

>Teauxny (Just say 'Noles) Travaglini

Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: crs@milton.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Subject: Re: Arizona State QB Bret Powers Quits, looks to Ohio State
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 21:03:24 GMT

kennedy@asuvax.eas.asu.edu (Ralph Kennedy) writes:
>
>     I sure hope Snyder knows what the hell he's
>doing.  Freshman McGee goes up against big bad
>Washington this Saturday for his first collegiate
>snap.

Goody Goody Goody!!!  I got dibs on a drumstick!

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
University of Washington      *   water again!
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: A&M is way-cool (was: something about cajun-high)
Date: 4 Sep 92 18:13:37 GMT
Organization: Chevron

In article <1992Sep3.162614.20653@a.cs.okstate.edu> chen@a.cs.okstate.edu (SMITH LISA MIN-YI) writes:
>
>Hi everybody.  I'm new to the group.  I've been reading thru these really
>neat postings and there's something that I just don't understand.  I just
>don't see why these Tx. Aggies (as opposed to an Oklahoma Aggie like me :)
>think they can just walk in to Death Valley Lousyanna (sp) and leave
>with a win.  Did you see that Goober gave J.J. 10 points in their dinner 
>bet?  These Aggies just kill me.  Oh sure, A&M is the best University
>in the world, steeped in tradition and pride, but everybody knows that LSU
>is going to absolutely kill those aggies in football on Saturday.
>
>My prediction:
>
>  LSU 100
>  A&M   2
>
>- lisa 
>
>ps: Somebody told me about Oliver's Woofing Theorem once...something like
>    the performance of your team is inversely proportional to how much
>    you woof about your team before the game.
>    Is there a corresponding anti-woofing theorem?

Neaux.  Seaux geaux away.

:)

**************************************************************************
-- 
GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!!    | "There once was a deputy named Fife,
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!!!!    |  Who carried a gun and a knife.
James Clyde  LSU '91    |  The gun was all dusty, the knife was all rusty,
  Mayberry Grafitti =>  |  'Cause he never caught a crook in his life."
From: brook@l42bb.jsc.nasa.gov) (Mike Brookover)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: A&M BEATS BILL WALSH
Date: 28 Aug 92 18:11:34 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Engineering & Sciences Co.

In article <1992Aug28.071407.1@ducvax.auburn.edu> swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu
writes:
>In article <1992Aug27.151107.29917@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>,
lein@base.ctt.bellcore.com (John Leinaweaver,,RRC-4A720,699-2322) writes:
>> 
>> and don't forget the bad call by the ref's giving A&M an interception on a 
>> play that had both pass interference and an interception after the
>> ball clearly bounced off the ground.  It certainly broke A&M's string   
>> of starting with poor field position in the 2nd half.
>> 
>> John L
>
>I didn't see the game, it wasn't carried in my area (grrr).  I did see a
>replay of the above-mentioned play on ESPN.  I realize that I saw the play
>out of context of the game, but I wonder:
>
>- If this play had been called correctly, would Stanford have won?
>
>Just curious,
>-- 
>David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu 
>
no

mgb
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com (Kevin Rodgers)
Subject: Re: Marsee Ratings & Predictions for 8/29/92
Organization: Martin Marietta Western Internal Systems, Technical Operations
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 17:21:46 GMT

In article <1992Aug26.064659.4370@newstand.syr.edu> demarsee@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Darryl E. Marsee) writes:

>  5. OKLAHOMA       (689)
>  8. NEBRASKA       (677)
> 18. COLORADO       (628)
> 20. KANSAS STATE   (626)
> 29. KANSAS         (613)

Big 8 Media Bias rears its ugly head!

> 68. OKLAHOMA STATE (545)
> 71. IOWA STATE     (543)
> 86. MISSOURI       (506)

... uh, maybe not.
-- 
Kevin Rodgers				kevin@traffic.den.mmc.com
Martin Marietta MS A16401		(303) 790-3971
116 Inverness Dr. East
Englewood CO 80112 USA			GO BUFFS!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Re: Trojan News
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 92 21:32:38 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <Bu0Ir3.91p.1@cs.cmu.edu> bnoble+@cs.cmu.edu (Brian Noble) writes:

>>USC 66
>>Cal 0

>1983?????  We have to go back to 1983 to find a good comeback to

I wasn't going to nitpick, but it strikes me as pretty unlikely that
Cal would have gotten waxed by U$C at home, so '83 isn't that likely.
Can anyone confirm/debunk this score?
-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: acdendy@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (ROGER DENDY)
Subject: Re: TOP 10 TEAMS: WHO HAS THE EASIEST SCHEDULE?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date:  3 Sep 1992 17:40 EST  

In article <1992Sep2.214358.21420@fcom.cc.utah.edu>, jli@bingham.utah.edu (Jianliang Li) writes...
> 
>	In the Top 10 teams, who has the easiest schedule? 
>	UW?
>	Texas A&M?
>	FSU?
> 

According to my computer, which bases all its conclusions on strength of 
schedule:

Team		Average Schedule Strength
4 Florida St		1.3
1 Miami			1.21
3 Notre Dame		1.20
8 Penn St		1.20
10 Syracuse		1.20
2 Washington		1.12
5 Florida		1.06
6 Michigan		1.05
7 Texas A&M		1.01
9 Alabama		0.88

R Dendy

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (Njan)
Subject: Re: 91 BlockBuster (Was Re: Bama in the polls)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 18:38:58 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.124111.3605@infonode.ingr.com> harbinjm@infonode.ingr.com (Mitch Harbin) writes:
>
>4 downs and can't make a first..actually the ball carrier was STUFFED on the
>4th. down try.  Sounds like a little butt kicking to me.

Now what was the score of that Florida - Bama game last year? 35-0 or something?
That's what I call REAL butt kicking...

For your information, NOBODY has beaten buffs by that margin in the last three
years and nobody will this season, either.

>This years edition of the Crimson Tide is going to be better than last year
>with most of the offense back.  A rematch isn't what you boys really want...

Oh yeah? The same offense who had to depend on speciat teams to score
points against a weaker buff defense last year? The same offense that scored
0(?) against a florida defense which got stomped by ND? What else is new?

>it could be worse for the buffs than last time (by the way what are you boys
>smokin' when you're posting???).  If you look at the pre-season ranks, BAMA
>is in the top ten where's Colorado?

pre-season rankings mean nothing... they're based on last seasons ranking. Wait
and see what happens THIS season.

>No, I don't think you want any more of the Tide.

You're right... we'd rather play Miami in the Orange Bowl...

Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: sschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Susan E Schudt)
Subject: Re: Trojan News
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 04:02:23 GMT


In article <6#ln4aa.mzimmers@netcom.com> mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
writes:
>In article <laane5INNm4j@sal-sun21.usc.edu> valdis@sal-sun21.usc.edu (Valdis K
alejs) writes:
>
>>GOOD POINT Brian! But lets take it a step further and go back two years ago
>>where I (and 60,000 other Coliseum fans) witnessed another episode of the
>>"class" of the average Cal fan. It was the first half of the USC/Cal game
>right in college sports.

Don't mean to interrupt your flame war, but just a little story about the class
of the USC team:

Remember the "brawl" before the USC-ND game in 89?  Well, being in the Notre 
Dame band, I witnessed two USC players physically assault two band members in 
the tunnel.  Lot's of class shown there.

>
>>Fight On,

Well, maybe.  Try picking on someone your own size.

>
>Take off,
>
>>Valdis Kalejs
>
>Which is "hosehead" spelled in U$C rot-x.
>-- 
>Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
>SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
>Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
-- 
           Susan E. Schudt                    0 0
     Dept. of Chemical Engineering
      Goooooooooooooooooo  IRISH!           \_____/
             Win Twins!
From: valdis@spica.usc.edu (Valdis Kalejs)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Fair Weather Fans
Date: 23 Aug 1992 17:36:17 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: spica.usc.edu

In article <1992Aug19.205145.29985@leland.Stanford.EDU> paladin@leland.Stanford.EDU (Jason Gische) writes:
>In article <l932seINNgg8@spica.usc.edu> valdis@spica.usc.edu (Valdis Kalejs) writes:
>>
>> Jason,
>>
>>Here's the real definition. A "fair weather fan" is a person who ONLY truly 
>>pledges their support when their team is doing well, or during "fair weather"
>>times,then drops out of sight when things aren't going so well. But what would
>>Cardinal fans know what support and loyalty REALLY mean?
>>
>>Fight On,
>>Valdis Kalejs
>>
>>
>>
>Valdis,
>
>Well, I can't even argue with your definition of a fair weather fan.  My point was that he was pledging support for the Trojans, just not expecting great things from them this year.  But what would a Trojan fan know about understanding a basic concept explained in writing.

Jason,
I understood the concept,just disagree with it...

 >Even when Stanford's teams do poorly, it's academics will always be top ten. 

  Does this mean if the Cardinal program hits the skids,you'll revert to 
  keeping score? Smart move...

>Can you spell REAL SCHOOL?

Yes!.. University of Southern California
>
>The Cardinal will pump and pump until they break the Trojans.
>Jason Gische

Pump? I suppose this is one more of your so called "basic concepts" from
dreamland?

Fight On, Beat the Aztecs!

Valdis
From: gt6363a@prism.gatech.EDU (John Hoang)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Why did the Gators drop in AP poll?
Date: 2 Sep 92 23:37:31 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <j.m.crant.1.6.0@nd.edu> j.m.crant.1@nd.edu (Mike Crant) writes:
>The Florida Gators dropped from 4th to 6th in the 2nd AP poll of the 
>season, in spite of the fact that they-- or the teams that jumped ahead of 
>them-- haven't played a game yet.  What's the deal here?  I haven't heard of 
>any key injuries or suspensions. 

Maybe they had a bad scrimage? :)
-- 
gt6363a@prism.gatech.edu 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college