HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Via:        UK.AC.LE.CSD.SYS; 13 OCT 92 14:27:28 BST
Via:        [143.210.72.189] (mac11.mcs); Tue, 13 Oct 92 14:29:19 GMT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 13 Oct 1992 14:36:11 +0000
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         pcm@LE.AC.UK
Subject:      Re: Q. about NNS (Netware Name Service) Bindery Structures

>
>Does anyone know the details of the NNS Bindery structures or where
>these can be obtained?
>
>Does Novell sell NNS APIs?
>
>Thanks.

I've asked this question before, with no joy.  It seems now that Novell are
ignoring it - there's no upgrade path to Netware 4.0 for it.  We still use
it but with only one file server, so a lot of the free tools still work.
The PROFILE feature is all we really need.


==================================================
   Paul C. Manning
   Senior Computer Officer
   Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
   University of Leicester
   University Road
   Leicester LE1 7RH
   U.K.
==================================================
From: JRD@USU.BITNET (Joe Doupnik)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: Re: Something else to worry about....
Date: 9 Oct 92 20:29:30 GMT
Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"
X-VMS-Cc: JRD
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

>Disclaimer:  The following in not intended to slight or accuse anyone, it
>  is meerly an issue to consider in network design/operation.
>
>With all the recent shareware/freeware NLM releases plus the security
>problems, I got a thought which left me with a sinking feeling.  An NLM
>on the server has low level access to the server's various processes.
>They have to in order to work.  Suppose a hacker wants to have easy
>access to a lot of servers.  S/he writes a 'gee whiz' NLM and put in a
>backdoor (or some other surprise) and puts it out on the Net.  Soon, if
>it's gee whiz enough, they can access many servers without breaking a
>sweat.
>
>I don't think there is any way to easily test for such things, is there?
>Of course, this is not limited to the "FTP-able" stuff.  A disgruntled
>programmer could possibly put such a trap into commercial packages.
>Hmmm, do you suppose MONITOR.NLM will reformat your disk after the year
>2000?  Ray Norda should be retired by then and it WOULD teach all those
>'Why should I update' whinners a lesson...
>
>Just a thought to prepare everyone for All Hallow Even.  Pleasant dreams.
>
>Greg Monroe  <Monroe@DukeFSB.BitNet>
>Duke's Fuqua School of Business
>Durham, NC  27708-0114
-------------
        It's not a dream but a distinct possibility. NLMs do run unrestricted.
That means I am selective about the pedigree of the material used here, and I
have to trust the writers. There just isn't an easy way of knowing if any
program is destructive on purpose or by accident (NLMs, DOS programs, whatnot).
This is one reason why Columbia Kermits are available as source code from a
trusted site and the patches are obscurely constructed.
        Joe D.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@suvm.acs.syr.edu"
X-VMS-Cc: HACKETT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 13 Oct 1992 10:04:00 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "Pat Hackett" <HACKETT@ACC.FAU.EDU>
Subject:      Phone number for American Power (UPS VENDOR)

If anyone has the phone number for American Power (UPS vendor), please
send it to me at

in%"hackett@acc.fau.edu"

As I recall, their products got good reviews on this net.

Thanks in advance,
-PAT-
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Priority:     normal
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 15:45:56 PST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Derek Sterling <DEREK@SAND.BERKELEY.EDU>
Subject:      SECUREFX.NLM

I had a long talk with a Novell rep yesterday afternoon about the
SECUREFX.NLM and VAP.  Here's what I'm allowed to say about the
newest security threat and Novell's patch:

1)  The threat is real.  Any networks that could conceivably have a
security breach should have the patch installed.

2)  The security breach relies on specific parts of packet
information being successfully captured and decoded.

3)  The patch adds a new dimension to packet security by making
packet sequence a critical issue.

4)  The patch defaults to a tolerance of 5 out of sequence packets
before sounding an alarm.

5)  An undocumented command line setting allows setting a different
tolerance level for the patch.  When loading the patch, Novell
recommends trying LEVEL = 10 on the command line

    (e.g. LOAD SECUREFX LEVEL = 10)

6)  The current recommended Patch Manager (PATCHMAN.NLM) for this
patch is version 2.23.

7)  There is slight performance degradation when loading any patch--
the risk must be considered against a small loss in performance
(though this one patch will have a negligible effect on performance).

8)  The latest SECUREFX "kit" was released at the beginning of
October and contains both .NLM and .VAP versions along with docs and
the latest PATCHMAN in a .ZIP file.  A good site for ftp is

    risc.ua.edu  /pub/network/novlib/01/secure.zip

9)  Novell is redesigning password schemes for the next version of
NetWare (4.0), but 3.11 will continue to ship as is.


I hope this information is useful to some of you.  I wish I could be
more specific about some things, but I was warned about what was O.K.
to discuss--so hackers need not ask!

Sleep well.

--ds








--Derek Sterling            sterling@garnet
  English Department        9-12am/1-4pm
  319 Wheeler Hall          (510) 642-6067
  U. C. Berkeley            (510) 642-4005

      Standard Response #1:

    We have not succeeded in answering all your questions.  The answers we
    have found only serve to raise a whole set of new questions.  In some
    ways we feel we are as confused as ever, but we believe we are
    confused on a higher level and about more important things.
From: AMINZADE@UVMVAX.BITNET (Russell Aminzade: Trinity College of VT)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: Re: questions from a syscon user virgin
Date: 15 Oct 92 13:24:00 GMT
Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"

Yeah, I don't really like the text editor in Syscon, either, but
if you hit F1, it will explain all the keys to you.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 13:40:03 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "(David Lewis)" <kelson@AIS.ORG>
Subject:      Re: mirrored copy didn't work

>
> This evening, we turned off the power of the two primary disks intendedly
> and wanted to simulate the situation in case the hard disks failed.
> However, the hardware check failed and everything ceased, not to mention
> the server BOOT or not. We use SCSI controller.  It seemed that we must
> always have the first hard disk available to have the server BOOT.
> This is beyond my imagination!   Did I do something wrong? Please shed
> some light.
>

  I was told by a local CNE that in his experience that if you
mirror using 1 drive controller, that 50% of the time its going to
crash your system because it freaks the controller out... and it
cant always access the other drive .... and you would have to
hurry up and disconnect the first drive and hook up the mirrored drive
in its place to get it back up.  However if you duples (using 2
drive controllers) this wouldnt happen (not to mention you get a better
throughput with multiple read requests and you dont have any overhead
of mirroring, unlike mirroring with 1 controller card

kelson@ais.org
From: M.Hall@SOUTHAMPTON.AC.UK (Martin)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: Re: Search Mapping in Win environment
Date: 16 Oct 92 14:01:40 GMT
Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:         UK.AC.SOTON; 16 OCT 92 15:03:24 BST
X-Mailer:    ELM [version 2.3 PL11]

Hello

We've done this before, and have found that virtual mappings under Windows
don't generally give any problems; our users tend to have all their DOS
apps open concurrently and use Windows to switch between them. The order of
opening & closing seems immaterial.
The only word of warning concerns Minitab which I've found needs an absolute
mapping set up before entering Windows.

However, most apps run without needing to set up search mappings if you use
a PIF file for each app. This inherits the map from the the file name box
(eg F:\apps\wp\wp.exe) and allows you to set the startup directory to
a suitable place for data (eg f:\users\user1)

This also allows you to run some apps as a Window rather than full screen if
you are running 386 enhanced mode.

Good Luck

Martin Hall

Dept of Psychology
University of Southampton, UK



>
>
> Hi, Novellers!
>
>         We are running NW3.11 with some 386 workstations running Windows;
> we want to serve some applications (WP, dBASE, Lotus 123 all DOS-based)
> What I've been doing is to start the applications from batch files that
> look about like this:
>
>         map insert s1:=sys:dbase   (or sys:lotus\123r31, etc)
>         dbase                      (or 123, etc)
>         map del s1:
>
> In a DOS environment, there's no problem, since only 1 of these batch
> files can be executed at a time.  However, in the Win. environment,
> there's a risk that someone will try to open up more than 1 served app.
> at a time.
>
>         First question:  will drive mappings get fouled if more than
>                 1 such file is executed in its own virtual space?
>
>         second:  Assuming that drive mappings are preserved as more
>                 than 1 such batch file spins away, is there any problem
>                 in TERMINATING the applications in other than the reverse
>                 order from which they were started?
>
> If you have any expperience with serving DOS applications to a Windows
> workstation, I'd be appreciative of any thoughts you'd care to send.
> If volume warrants, I'll post summary.
> Thanks in advance
> Mitch Edelman
> mjedelma@ssa.gov
>
From: agl1@LEICESTER.AC.UK (A.G. Lowe-Norris)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: PAUDIT2
Date: 14 Oct 92 10:28:58 GMT
Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via: uk.ac.leicester; Wed, 14 Oct 1992 11:29:32 +0100
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL0 (LUT)]

> >
> > I was wondering what others are doing for server use statistics.  I need
> > stuff like "How many people were logged on in this lab today", and "How many
> > different users were on the system this month?".  Does anyone know of an
> > easy way to get this info? (it must be cheap too!) I was thinking of using
> > AWK...has anyone done this?
>
> John,
>       Try PAUDIT2. I have v1.10 (Jan 1991). It is written by Wolfgang
> Schreiber @ Novell and is highly useful.
>
> Version 1.10 allows you to specify login addresses, dates, users, intruder
> lockout addresses & much more - but not at the same time. Each option can only
> be used seperately which is unfortunate. It would not surprise me if this had
> been fixed now.
>
> The version I have I would guess is quite old and has been updated since.
> Does anyone else know what the current version is & where to get it from.
>
> Alistair.
>
> P.S. We have just received NetWare for Macintosh v3.01 which supports printer
> accounting on any Appletalk printer. Is anyone else using this because we
 would
> like to talk to others about it. It seems to work fine.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Alistair G. Lowe-Norris, Systems Programmer         UK: agl1@uk.ac.leicester|
| Computer Centre, Leicester University,          Non-UK: agl1@leicester.ac.uk|
| University Road, Leicester LE1. 7RH., U.K.                                  |
|                                                                             |
| Internal Tel: x2250             Fax: x5027                                  |
| UK       Tel: (0533) 522250     Fax: (0533) 525027                          |
| Non-UK   Tel: +44 (533) 522250  Fax: +44 (533) 525027                       |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: CORDOBA@AROSARIO.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: Collisions
Date: 17 Oct 92 02:53:48 GMT
Reply-To: CORDOBA@AROSARIO.BITNET
Organization: UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

The Novell NetWare v3.11 (20 user) server I manage reports a high
Total Collisions Count (about 7,760,000 in four hours) and a high
Excess  Collisions Count  (about 1,270  at the  same period). If you
know someone who can deal with the problem, please let me know!
_
     LJUBICH Jorge David           Fidonet : Jorge Ljubich, 4:903/0
     Kowalk 82                      Bitnet : cordoba@arosario.bitnet
     5800 R!o Cuarto (CB)              Tel : +54-586-4-5835 (com.)
     Rep. Argentina                    Fax : +54-586-2-4567
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 10:22:13 EST
Reply-To:     szymon@ucinvl.uci.agh.edu.pl
Comments:     Resent-From: JAY SISSOM <JSISSOM@INDYCMS>
Comments:     Originally-From: Szymon Sokol <SZYMON@UCINVL.UCI.AGH.EDU.PL>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was NOVELERR@SUVM.SYR.EDU
From:         JAY SISSOM <JSISSOM@INDYCMS.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Automating Netware Logins

There is a program on my FTP server that will allow you to attach to
a server using a password from the command line.  It is called XATTACH
and is on IUMEDICINE.IUPUI.EDU  in the NOVELL directory.

You would type XATTACH server user password.  I believe it also sets the
errorlevel incase of a problem.  I am not sure, because I didn't write
this program.

A big problem with accounts with no passwords is that if you have the
Mac NLM loaded, Mac's can login as that user even if there is a station
restriction.

Jay Sissom
Indiana University Department of Medicine
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> From:         wolfgang.roeckelein@SOWI.UNI-BAMBERG.DBP.DE
> Well, if you are not interested in security, why not use an accoutn without
> an password? You can do just LOGIN SERVER/NAME for this.

Well, there is one reason: if someone (like me) wants to log in *automatically*
from one trusted station (at the office), but still be able to log in from
anywhere - with password (because "anywhere" may be in students' lab...).
If you want to log in from one secure place only, the better way is to restrict
logins for the account to this one station and remove the password.


                                   Szymon Sokol
                                   Network Manager

     U     U  M     M  M     M     Computer Center
     U     U  MM   MM  MM   MM     University of Mining and Metallurgy
     U     U  M M M M  M M M M     ave. Mickiewicza 30
     U     U  M  M  M  M  M  M     30-059 Krakow, POLAND
     U     U  M     M  M     M     TEL.    +48 12 338100 EXT. 2885
      UUUUU   M     M  M     M     TEL/FAX +48 12 338907
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via: uk.ac.manchester.computer-science; Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:32:35 +0100
X-Disclaimer: Any opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect
X-Disclaimer: those of Barclays Bank Plc.
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:19:38 GMT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Rod Wilson <Rod.Wilson@BARCLAYS.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: OS/2 Requester

>
> I have the new requester pack and it doesn't help.  I have seen the
> question asked both here and on usenet, but have not seen an answer;
>
> The apps don't seem to recognize files or file attributes properly
> in global mode ( not just DOS global).  This really means that only
> private DOS sessions(with NETX and a separate sign-on)  operate
> predictably and reliably.  For example,
> the OS/2 Editor will not create a file on a network drive.  The text
> editor I have been using (Program Editor from WP Library) will
> browse network files including allowing me to read the contents, but
> when I push the "Retrieve" button, I get a 'file not found message'.
>
> The latest fix did not even mention this problem.  This is serious
> enough that I am considering switching to LAN Manager so I can go
> with OS/2.
>
> All suggestions appreciated,
>
Bob,

Are you loading the OS/2 name space support on the file server? I had
problems with attributes that were being lost, etc, due to Netware
not recognising some of the OS/2 attributes. Since loading the OS/2
name space the problems appear to have gone away.

Hope this is of some use.

Rod.Wilson@barclays.co.uk
Barclays Bank Plc
England
From: AMINZADE@UVMVAX.BITNET (Russell Aminzade: Trinity College of VT)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Subject: Re: usage log
Date: 15 Oct 92 13:21:00 GMT
Reply-To: Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET"

James Riddle's program to track usage seems nice, though I think Monitor
is a dangerous name (for reason's that should be obvious to many...).
We have enough problems with the Monitor NLM, the Monitors (screens) in
our lab, and the Monitors (student employees) who work in the lab.

As for his little "snoop" program to record program use, I'm intending
to just add a line to our menu system for each application to do the same.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Crynwr Software
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 7 Oct 1992 14:27:33 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Russell Nelson <nelson@CRYNWR.COM>
Subject:      Re: 3com 3C523/TP Ethernet Cards

On 5 Oct 92 11:44:07 GMT, "Rod Wilson" <Rod.Wilson@BARCLAYS.CO.UK> wrote:

> The solution was simple. The card had been accidently configured to
> use the internal RJ45 port, when this was corrected all was well.
>
> However, the $64,000 question is this:
>
>     If the card was configured for RJ45 and our network was connected
>     to the AUI, how on earth could it see anything on the network
>     while configured wrongly???!!!!

Some vendors don't actually turn off the AUI port when you have two
ports, they wire-or the signals between the two ports.

--
-russ <nelson@crynwr.com> I'm proud to be a humble Quaker!
Crynwr Software           Crynwr Software sells packet driver support.
11 Grant St.              315-268-1925 Voice  |  LPF member - ask me about
Potsdam, NY 13676         315-268-9201 FAX    |  the harm software patents do.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Resent-Subject: Copy Protection   &   Rprinter/Win3.1 Problem
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 11:39:15 PDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments:     Resent-From: Mark Edson <DI603@CALPOLY>
From:         Mark Edson <DI603@CALPOLY.BITNET>
Subject: Copy Protection & Rprinter/Win3.1 Problem

First - many thanks to the responses that we got for our win 3.0/Novell3.11
problem - turns out, we just upgraded to win 3.1, and our problems went
away.  Thanks again.

Two Questions:

We are running rprinter on a few workstations that also have Windows 3.1
installed.  When we run Windows 3.1 on one of these workstations, the print
server reports the printer on that machine is not connected.  We put
SPX ABORT TIMEOUT = 2000 in our net.cfg.  We are still having this problem.

Second Question:
Is there any good security software that we can purchase that will lock down
our applications on our server?  Something like FileGuard for the Macintosh.
The Execute-Only attribute only goes so far 8>.

Thanks in advance.

Please reply directly to me.

Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------
Sender:
   Mark Edson, PC Software Technition/Assistant Manager
   Academic Computing Services, California Polytechnic
   1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

   Office Phone: 805-756-6549          Home Phone: 805-756-6631
   Internet: medson@nike.calpoly.edu   BITNET: DI603 AT CALPOLY
---------------------------------------------------------------

    Copy Protection  &   Windows/RPrinter combo                             


---------------------------------------------------------------
Sender:
   Mark Edson, PC Software Technition/Assistant Manager
   Academic Computing Services, California Polytechnic
   1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

   Office Phone: 805-756-6549          Home Phone: 805-756-6631
   Internet: medson@nike.calpoly.edu   BITNET: DI603 AT CALPOLY
---------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 14 Oct 1992 10:36:19 EDT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Pascal Jacquin <PASCAL@FRESCP11.BITNET>
Subject:      Accounting & Managing printer (Q)

Hi Networkers,

Does anybody know how to control the printing of the number of pages
allowed for an account on a netware 3.11 ?

example : Mr MARTIN is allowed to print 100 Pages on a specific printer
he asks for a print job of 120 pages ; Netware hold the job.

Thanks for any suggesions.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:44:10 -0700
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Allen Lung <lung@EOS.ARB.CA.GOV>
Subject:      Re: CNE Opinion

I just started the Course.  I believe if you study the course objective
you wont have any problems.  Novell seems to put togather an excellent
course, so if followed I hope I wont have any problems.


On Thu, 8 Oct 1992, Joe Doupnik wrote:

> >
> >> In bit.listserv.novell article
> >> <921003150806.2301559f@NOBEL.ISD.UPMC.EDU> you wrote:
> >> > I realize I am opening a can of worms but I am just about ready to
> >> spend a
> >> > large chunk of change on CNE Training and would like some opinions.
> >> >
> >>
> >> > I am the poster child for Insecurity, especially when it involves
> >> tests.  Has
> >> > anyone out there taken CNE training and how was it?  What does it
> >> take to get
> >> > successfully through it?
> >> >
> >>
> >> > Any and all comments would be greatly appreciated.
> >> >
> >>
> >> > BRUNIJ@NOBEL.ISD.UPMC.EDU
> >>
> >I heard that Novell provide a computer based mock CNE test that can be
> >run on a pc. I am not sure if it is available to all or just to
> >suppliers/resellers. Does anyone (Novell?) out there know?
> >
> >
> >Rod.Wilson@barclays.co.uk
> >Barclays Bank Plc
> >England
> -----------------
>         Informal CNE network question #1: where to get Novell's free goodies?
>         Answers: friends, Compuserve, ftp.is.sandy.novell.com, mirrors of
 same.
> In this case check novlib\02\CNE*.* on the latter three.
>         Joe D.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: paul@ace.acadiau.ca (Paul Steele)
Subject: Using Adaptec 1542b with more than 16 megs of server RAM
Organization: Acadia University
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 11:25:16 GMT

I plan to install an Adaptec 1542b into my file server for controlling a 
scsi tape drive.  Since the server is an EISA machine with 49 megs of RAM, 
am I going to enounter problems because the 1542b uses DMA and therefore 
can't access RAM above 16 megs.  If that is the case, what scsi controller 
do people recommend for this situation?  The server also has a PROCOMP
MDCB/32 eisa controller for the hard disks, but the ARCSERVE software
doesn't apppear to support that controller.

___
Paul Steele, Network Services Manager              902-542-2201x660
Acadia University, Computer Centre            FAX: 902-542-4364
Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada, B0P 1X0  Internet: Paul.Steele@acadiau.ca