HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:58:08 -0400 
From: "Jonathan D. Lyness" <jl6e+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Spider-Man is joining the X-Men!!
	<18pdkmINN986@interceptor.ksu.ksu.edu>

 lazarus@interceptor.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith) writes:
>Actually, somebody DID call X-Factor in on Spidey... it was J. Jonah Jameson!
>(Suprise suprise!)  The Beast took him up on it, but only did so
because he was
>interested in whether Spidey COULD be a mutant or not.  Mind you,
Spidey didn't
>take too well to being chased around by an X-Factor van.   (Now, if I
could only
>remember what issue that was in.  I KNOW it was one of the Spider-Man titles.
>Anyone out there who remembers?)

Yep - Amazing Spider-Man #282 - basically another misunderstanding/fight
scene/apology kind of issue, though pretty well written - the scenes
with JJJ were fun.

-jon
From: rlcarr@animato.network23.com (Rich Carreiro)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Excalibur #55 ***SPOILERS***
Distribution: world
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 1.16e (7/4/92) by Mike Schwartz & Michael B. Smith
Date: 3 Sep 92 08:09:26 EDT
Organization: The Other Side of Life

In article <2!xyh-q@rpi.edu> chinm@aix.rpi.edu (Mang Shing Chin) writes:
> In article <rlcarr.057g@animato.network23.com> rlcarr@animato.network23.com (Rich Carreiro) writes:
> >You wuz warned...

> >
> >My, my, my, my, my...
> >
> >Well, talk about dangling plotlines coming home to roost...
> >(3) Heeeee's baaaaack...Jamie Braddock has returned, and according
> >    to the letters page, Vixen will be back next ish as well.
> >I continue to be amazed at the pace at which Davis is closing up loose
> >ends.
> 
> I may be wrong on this, but isn't Nigel Frobisher actually Vixen?

Yes and no.  The last time we saw them, Jamie turned the real Vixen into, well,
a vixen, and then changed Nigel's body to look like Vixen (and can of course
change him back and forth).

> >Again, who actually dies depends on exactly what Jamie can and wants to do.
> >However, my guess is that Alysdane and Meggan are dead for good :( and Kurt
> >and the rest are just injured to various degrees.
> 
> Remember we're talking about comics here.  Alysdane may be dead, but I
> really doubt Meggean is.

I hope you are right.

> >Guess we'll have to wait for #56 to find out more....
> >
> and eager awaiting it...

You got that right.

-- 
Rich Carreiro                                  Home: (401)841-8514
rlcarr@animato.network23.com
uunet.uu.net!animato!rlcarr
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: whijv2@cspyr1.cs.adfa.oz.au (WHITAKER JASON)
Subject: Most violent mutant
Organization: Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, Australia
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 07:05:02 GMT


Who is the most violent mutant?

Anyone wanna put forward an argument to Wolverine?

The Sneaky One
From: jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: cable/stryfe/mr.sinister
Date: 15 Sep 92 16:43:02 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

nova@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jennifer Baughman) writes:

>Sure it's possible...  But theoretically, a clone of Cable would not have the
>_exact_ same scar in the _exact_ same place with the _exact_ same cybernetics!
>In theory, at least, if Stryfe were a clone of Cable, he would be a physically
>perfect (unmarked by scars, cybernetics, etc.) copy.  Therefore, Stryfe is
>_not_ a clone of Cable, or vice versa.  But I like the Cable/Stryfe/Mr. 
>Sinister deal... But it'll never happen.

If someone has the technology to clone an individual, it would *not* be 
difficult to attach a few cybernetics and create scars in the right places.

Of course, it'll *still* probably never happen.

			James Willer
{the opinions above are probably NOT those of
 anyone at all}
From: kbos@carina.unm.edu (Kurt Bose "of Biscayzee")
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Scott Lobdell is still a moron...X-Men 294 spoilers
Date: 10 Sep 92 19:32:10 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <BuDFpK.9AF@rice.edu> jimwong@owlnet.rice.edu (Jim Wong) writes:
>In article <18k899INNk0@venture.ksu.ksu.edu> lazarus@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith) writes:
>>
>>In article <92249.111101EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu>, EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu (Ernie Oporto) writes:
>>>OK...I'm going to write this as I'm reading X-Men #294.
>>>Page 3, panel 2: Security parameter?  Ex-squeeze me?  Thats perimeter, you
>>>    moron!
>>
>>No... "parameter" works...
>>
>Wrong.  Go check out the context; I'd be willing to bet large sums of money
>that the word was supposed to be "perimeter," but either Lobdell couldn't
>manage the spelling or the letterer screwed up.  The former possibility
>wouldn't surprise me too much, considering we live in a country, apparently,
>in which the vast majority of the citizens cannot distinguish "your" from
>"you're" or spell "weird" correctly.

Sorry, can't see that the usage of "parameter" is bad.  "Perimeter" may refer 
to a physical boundary, but "parameter" in this case would read as though Bishop
feels that they couldn't keep security at necessary protective levels.  That the
constancy of their vigilance was less than desirable, rather than the physical
boundary of their protection.  Seems perfectly fine.

Of course, the original poster seems kinda anal to even mention it...


-- 
Kurt Bose (as in Daisy, not Rose) *  kbos@carina.unm.edu * Make outs, not walks!
Keeper of the R.S.BB FAQ, and Junior Stathead {tm} * OK, so I AM the AntiChrist.
Be kind...don't disillusion the RBI-lovers. * Net.Agent, "Doublin" David Rossing
Less widely published as Noel Steere; less likely to rampage than Gary Huckabay.
From: albert@chain.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Rick Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Claremont
Date: 10 Sep 1992 20:59:37 GMT
Organization: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tx

In article <18nm1sINN5r8@bigboote.WPI.EDU> cbuteau@wpi.WPI.EDU (Christopher W Buteau) writes:
>
>2. Does anyone know about the rumor that Claremont is going to do a book for
>Image?  Is there truth to this? Who's drawing? What's the title? When is
>it due out?

	He was going to do something with Whilce Portacio (excuse the 
spelling), but WP decided he'd rather be McLeifeld and to the writer/artist
bit.  
-- 
Rick Jones				Systems Support Center
albert@bcm.tmc.edu			Baylor College of Medicine
Voice: 713-798-7352			standard disclaimers apply
"I'm the Chosen One.  And I choose to go shopping."-Buffy the Vampire Slayer
From: jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: The new X-Force and U.X-Men
Date: 10 Sep 92 17:06:40 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <ZEESHAN.92Sep9232302@occs.cs.oberlin.edu> zeeshan@occs.cs.oberlin.edu (Zeeshan Hasan) writes:

>In article <1992Sep10.024824.20421@njitgw.njit.edu> bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler) writes:

>>   What exactly is Illyana's power?  I thought it specifically involved
>>   teleporting by passing through Limbo, so that part COULDN'T be cut out.
>>
>>   Hey, wait a minute!  In Uncanny X-Men #161 (I think, the issue where
>>   Illyana "skips" seven years), the X-Men got into Limbo by getting
>>   snagged by some of these "stepping disks."  How were they activated?
>>   Did Belasco cause Illyana's power to prematurely and subconsciously
>>   activate?  Does Illyana actually have her powers currently?  Were
>>   they just similar disks, and not actually Illyana's?  Inquiring minds
>>   want to know!!!!!!

>	Well, the stepping disks that were appearing all over the
>place in that issue should have been Belasco's, as Illyana wasn't
>"old" enough to manifest any mutant abilities until the end of the
>issue.  I suppose that her sorcerous training may have subsequently
>influenced the mechanism of her own teleport disks, as well as bound
>her to Limbo somehow....
>	Better yet, chalk this one up to a continuity mistake on the
>part of the writers... 

How is it a continuity mistake? The disks *could* have been Belasco's
influence over Illyana as a means to get her into limbo.
Alternatively, they could have been created by an older Illyana already
in limbo, in order to complete the cycle.  Remember, time is relatively
meaningless in Limbo.  There were alternative versions of several Xmen
running around, for instance.  
Or maybe Limbo-Illyana was manipulating the island trying to prevent
the disks from opening, without realizing that she was actually the
cause (ooh, smell the irony...)

How can you complain about continuity in Limbo? I-)

			James Willer
{the opinions above are probably NOT those of
 anyone at all}
From: bc751@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Howard Z. Shiau)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: X-Men Cartoon
Date: 7 Sep 1992 04:29:54 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bc751@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Howard Z. Shiau)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I've been looking for the X-Men cartoon all weekend(Labor Day).
When is it supposed to air?
-- 
Howard Shiau                       bc751@cleveland.freenet.edu
Cosyde Corporation
From: c60b-3fe@web-3a.berkeley.edu (Mikel Bancroft)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: X-Men Cartoon
Date: 7 Sep 1992 05:35:56 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: web-3a.berkeley.edu

In article <18els2INNpkf@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bc751@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Howard Z. Shiau) writes:
>
>I've been looking for the X-Men cartoon all weekend(Labor Day).
>When is it supposed to air?

I read in one of those Comic preview magazines (I forget the name) that
its debut was being set back to October.  I dont normally read any of
those mags, I was wasting time at the comic shop deciding on how much more
money to spend :), so I dont know if it is completely reliable or not.
Plus if it was on this weekend there were bound to be some posts on it.

MIkel B.
"Its not the mileage, its the make." - Cain
From: lazarus@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Bart -Laz- Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Sara Grey; was Re: The new X-Force and U.X-Men
Date: 12 Sep 1992 01:58:17 -0500
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: venture.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <18rupeINN80o@agate.berkeley.edu>, katie@physics.Berkeley.EDU (Katie Schwarz) writes:
>Sara Grey is Jean's sister, who is married and has two kids. She used to
>speak out against anti-mutant prejudice. Sometime between UX-Men 210 and
>220 -- I don't remember exactly, or maybe it was in X-Factor -- her house
>was firebombed, and she and the children were missing. The kids (I forget
>their names) eventually turned up during Inferno in the hands of Nanny
>(the one who looked like an egg) and Orphan Maker; at the end of Inferno
>they went home with Sara and Jean's parents.
>
>Was Sara herself ever found, or is this still dangling?

I thought that her body was found in the wreckage.  Remember, Nanny's tactics 
were, sadly, to kill the parents, thus making the children orphans...

>
>katie@physics.berkeley.edu

--
Bart -Laz- Smith
Kansas State University
In one week the 'Cats go hunting for Grizzlies...
"Do you live around here often?" -- Steven Wright -- "I Have a Pony"
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Who was the Traitor?
Date: 15 Sep 92 21:50:58 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <0ehVJx200WBNA46mMP@andrew.cmu.edu> mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael J. Keating) writes:
>Lets think about this for just a minute.  We've all been trying to
>figure out who it was that betrayed the team and killed professor X, and
>now the crossover goes and gives us an explanation and we ignore it. 
>Try to follow along.  First, we are given the hint that the assassin was
>Gambit.  Gambit has since become waaaaay to popular for the x-writers to
>lose as a team member, so they come up with an alternate traitor --
>Cable (who may or may not actually be Stryfe in disguise).  Remember --
>the costume Jean Grey was wearing when she made the recording about the
>betrayal (the tape that Bishop saw) was her current one. (With the
>current trend in comics fashion, that means that the betrayal had to
>occur in what would be our immediate future.)  Also, the blast that
>supposedly killed Jean on that tape was not indicative of Gambit's
>powers, but may have been a blast generated by such weaponry as
>Cable/Stryfe uses.
>There must be a real connection in there somewhere...  

Yes, but wasn't she saying something like "Never should have trusted...
<static> ... didn't know enough about... <more static>" or something
like that?  No one outside of X-Force has ever trusted Cable, so
Jean's remarks wouldn't make much sense if it was Cable, would they?

-- 
"Dog bites man--that's not a story.  Man bites dog--*that's* a story.  And
if the dog and the man slug it out for six issues, and then Wolverine shows
up for a guest appearance, and the dog turns out to be a mutant, that's a
*Marvel* story!"			-Marvel Editorial Handbook
From: by248@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Christine Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: X-Men Cartoon Lost in Space?
Date: 14 Sep 1992 12:18:28 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I'm posting this on behalf of my 13-year old x-fan son:
Our local Fox station has dropped all x-things from fall cartoon
commercials.  I've been told another semi-local Fox station has
done the same thing.  I'd heard that the cartoon had been delayed
until October, but now they're giving a good imitation of a 
couple of stations that have dropped it altogether!
Is there some new development that we don't know about?  Has the
cartoon been cancelled for some reason or is our locat (make that
*local*) station just being a jerk for some reason?
Thanks in advance!
(And yeah, I like the X-folks too...)
-- 
Christine Reynolds             And remember the truth that once
by248@cleveland.Freenet.Edu    was spoken:  To love another
Reynolds@utklib.lib.utk.edu    person is to see the face of God.
					'Les Miserables'
From: mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael J. Keating)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: favorites
Date: 9 Sep 92 00:15:43 GMT
Organization: Freshman, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Well, we can all go on lamenting the departure of Claremont ( in which I
have also participated), or we can look forward to the new team that we
will be getting soon. Seriously, folks, do you think that this one can
stay around too long?  The best Claremont issues - 190's-200's, had
something to do with the art of Buscema.  I have always thought (meaning
no disrespect to Jim Lee, whom I think is just as good) that Buscema
captured the spirit of the X-Men better than almost anyone (Art Adams,
Jim Lee).  It would be great to see him return!  Maybe some lobbying
could do it, although I have no idea where he is currently pencilling.

While I'm here, I thought I might just toss around a few memories.  What
are everybody's favorites, incidentally?  Here are mine.

Character:  Rachel Summers (before Excalibur), Shadowcat, Collossus
Art: tie - Lee-Adams
Storyline: In Uncanny, my favorite issue was the tri-fold cover, where
the X-Men            
           found Xavier and Rogue and Magneto were together.
           In X-Factor, it would have to be the development of Archangel.
           In X-Force, the emergence of Cannonball as a real character.
(C'mon, look what I had to work with.)
Cover - X-Men Annual number nine (Storm in Asgard), tri-fold)

Just shooting the breeze
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: m23364@mwunix (James Meritt)
Subject: Re: Mimic ...
Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean VA
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 18:13:59 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.171427.19056@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer) writes:
}Ps. I wonder what would happen if Rogue absorbed his powers. Or vice versa.
}Or both.

Well, Cal & the Super Adaptoid cancelled each other out.  Not only could they
NOT copy each other (adaptoid was avengers at the time, mimic was original
X-men), but they both lost all the copied powers.  Which was bad news, since
at the time they were flying (adaptoid as giant wasp, mimic with angel wings).
splash!

Now, it's clear Rogue couldn't copy the anderoid (not human), but no idea
on Cal & Rogue...


Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: doctor@watson (Bao-Phac Do (doctor zero))
Subject: Re: Bishop vs change of team
Organization: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, lab. INFO
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 03:09:12 GMT

In article <1992Sep13.083409.11177@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au> whijv2@cspyr1.cs.adfa.oz.au (WHITAKER JASON) writes:
>Yes, I think Bishop should join X-Force.
>
>He has the right mentality for them.}:>
>
>Maybe they should start a new comic called X-Psychos.
>
>Members: Cable, Wolverine, Bishop, Sabretooth, Shatterstar, Magneto...
>
>
>Anybody wanna add anymore to this wonderfully bloodthirsty team?
>

Psylocked possessed by Emma Frost, Selene, Fitz@!#-roy, Shinobi

d0c
>
>The Sneaky One


-- 
 ______  Bao Phac (Paul) Do  | Silence = Death
 \    /  P.O. Box 655        | Straight men suck, but we suck better !
  \  /   Mont-Royal, Quebec  | QUEERS BASH BACK! 
   \/    H3P 3G4  CANADA     |                  -=> doctor@info.polymtl.ca
From: v116r8ac@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Chris Nasipak)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: (More) proof Cable is Nathan Summers (PLOT SPOILER)
Date: 12 Sep 92 16:57:00 GMT
Organization: United Nations Intelligence Taskforce
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Sep11.183754.24118@access.usask.ca>, donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald) writes...
>jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer) writes:
> 
>>In <1992Sep11.143441.12912@access.usask.ca> donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald) writes:
> 
>>>mark rieker <MJR127@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> 
>>>>      Well, as if you needed it, here's some semi-concrete proof that Cable is
>>>>   Nathan Summers, in one form or another....
> 
>>>>      WARNING:  I give out a (rough) plotline for the X-cutioners song
>>>>                storyline. No secrets, but if you don't want it get out now
> 
>>>>                (ooh, what a dangler!)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>>But they're not all related, at least not by genetic means... Scott, Havok, 
>>>Cable and Stryfe could be, if the latter two are actually Nathan Summers in 
>>>one form or another, but Jean is merely Scott's intended... there's no genetic
>>>connection there... So, am I confused, or missing something obvious??
> 
>>Nathan's mother (Madelyne sp?) was a clone of Jean. So she's as much of a
>>genetic match as Scott, and more of one than Alex!
> 
>>					James Willer
> 
>But that's not my point.  If Cable (and Stryfe) are somehow related to Scott 
>Summers, then the Summers genes are in all four men (Havok being a brother.)
>Jean, on the other hand, is not genetically linked to the Summers, but 
>rather to the son,... so is it that any Summers or Grey could enter, or what?

No.. Anyone GENETICALLY RELATED to NATHAN Summers (IF that's who he really is.)




> 
>Dave
>-- 
>| donald@dvinci.usask.ca		|  "Imagine every atom in your body  | 
>| Communications Systems Research Group |  accelerating away from you at the |
>| University of Saskatchewan		|  speed of light."  "Total Protonic |
>| Saskatoon, Canada                     |  Reversal."  "Okay, that's BAD."   |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you really feel like   |         Not Croaker           |Somewhere else, the
arguing with a can of     |                               |tea is getting cold.
deoderant that registers  | v116r8ac@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu |Come on - we've got
nine on the Richter Scale?|   nasipak@acsu.buffalo.edu    | work to do.
        --- Ace           |                               |  --- Doctor Who
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I wasn't expecting the ReichsInspektor General."  -- General Strasser
"No One expects the Reichsinspektor General." -- Doctor Who, TimeWyrm:Exodus
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer - If SUNY wants my opinions, they'll pay through the nose for 'em!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald)
Subject: Re: (More) proof Cable is Nathan Summers (PLOT SPOILER)
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 18:37:54 GMT

jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer) writes:

>In <1992Sep11.143441.12912@access.usask.ca> donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald) writes:

>>mark rieker <MJR127@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>>>      Well, as if you needed it, here's some semi-concrete proof that Cable is
>>>   Nathan Summers, in one form or another....

>>>      WARNING:  I give out a (rough) plotline for the X-cutioners song
>>>                storyline. No secrets, but if you don't want it get out now

>>>                (ooh, what a dangler!)
























>>But they're not all related, at least not by genetic means... Scott, Havok, 
>>Cable and Stryfe could be, if the latter two are actually Nathan Summers in 
>>one form or another, but Jean is merely Scott's intended... there's no genetic
>>connection there... So, am I confused, or missing something obvious??

>Nathan's mother (Madelyne sp?) was a clone of Jean. So she's as much of a
>genetic match as Scott, and more of one than Alex!

>					James Willer

But that's not my point.  If Cable (and Stryfe) are somehow related to Scott 
Summers, then the Summers genes are in all four men (Havok being a brother.)
Jean, on the other hand, is not genetically linked to the Summers, but 
rather to the son,... so is it that any Summers or Grey could enter, or what?

Dave
-- 
| donald@dvinci.usask.ca		|  "Imagine every atom in your body  | 
| Communications Systems Research Group |  accelerating away from you at the |
| University of Saskatchewan		|  speed of light."  "Total Protonic |
| Saskatoon, Canada                     |  Reversal."  "Okay, that's BAD."   |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald)
Subject: Re: (More) proof Cable is Nathan Summers (PLOT SPOILER)
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:34:41 GMT

mark rieker <MJR127@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

>      Well, as if you needed it, here's some semi-concrete proof that Cable is
>   Nathan Summers, in one form or another....

>      WARNING:  I give out a (rough) plotline for the X-cutioners song
>                storyline. No secrets, but if you don't want it get out now

>                (ooh, what a dangler!)
























>          O.K. maybe you've all heard this but:

Little bits, but not too much... carry on.

>          1) Apocalypse takes Cyclops and Marvel Woman to a secret vortex on
>             the moon. (Ooh!)

>          2) Stryfe follows him to the moon

>          3) Cable and everyone else, follows Stryfe to the moon (don't ask
>             me how)

>          4) The climax comes inside the vortex (does it ever :) ) BUT

>             - The only ones who are able to go into the vortex are:
>               Cyclops, Marvel Woman, Stryfe, Cable and Havok! (Hmmmm..)

>          5) So what do these 5 have in common?  Could it be......

>             SATAN ?!?    No, maybe......

>             They're all related?  Maybe! Tune in next week......

But they're not all related, at least not by genetic means... Scott, Havok, 
Cable and Stryfe could be, if the latter two are actually Nathan Summers in 
one form or another, but Jean is merely Scott's intended... there's no genetic
connection there... So, am I confused, or missing something obvious??

Dave
-- 
| donald@dvinci.usask.ca		|  "Imagine every atom in your body  | 
| Communications Systems Research Group |  accelerating away from you at the |
| University of Saskatchewan		|  speed of light."  "Total Protonic |
| Saskatoon, Canada                     |  Reversal."  "Okay, that's BAD."   |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks