HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: elambert@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Eber Lambert)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 20:29:25 GMT

k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (ce) writes:

>In article <1992Sep1.203608.8723@morrow.stanford.edu> AH.PBL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Mark) writes:
>>In article <92245.082714CXF111@psuvm.psu.edu>,
>>CXF111@psuvm.psu.edu (Charles Fee) writes:
>>>In article <w-jnnna.bagus@netcom.com>, bagus@netcom.com (Mark E. Ruedy) says:
>>>>
>>>>That would be "Space Balls", (I think thats the title).  The cast included
>>>>Rick Moranis, and others.  Didn't sound too bad, but *boy* was it shit!
>>>>
>>>Huh? I laughed and laughed and laughed.. I still watch that movie to this day..
>>>One of the funniest movies I've ever seen. This is Mel Brooks at his
>>>absolute best!                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>  You obviously haven't seen "The Producers".
>>
>Or Blazing Saddles
>   Young Frankenstein
>   High Anxiety
>   
>In fact the only Brooks film I would rate *lower* than Spaceballs is
>History of the World Part I. But even so it wasn't embarrassing to watch.


Actually Space Balls was weak but "Life Stinks" is ABSOLUTELY HIDEOUS and
embarassing.                        

But in the Mel family the ULTIMATE worst was the movie Marty Feldman
did with Louise Lasser around 81.... cant remember the name but Marty played
a monk who broke his vow of silence... Is was so bad that my wife and I
(who now is cynical go into ANY comedy I choose) bailed and snuck into the
adjoining theatre to watch an almost as bad Walter Matthau movie and were
relieved.


Another stinker was "Wholly Moses" at around the same time. As I recall I
was banned from picking movies for a couple of months that year.


el
From: fofp@castle.ed.ac.uk (M Holmes)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Film with the least actors
Date: 2 Sep 92 10:32:55 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

Late one night I caught a film called "Secret Honour" which seemed to
have only one actor doing a long monologue. Dunno who it was but he
played Richard M.Nixon.

Actually, now that I know a little about Watergate, I'd quite like to
see it again. Does anyone have any details?

FoFP
From: rcbi27@muvms3.bitnet (DBRUM)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: SWF thumbnail review (minor, common SPOILERS)
Date: 28 Aug 92 17:51:27 GMT
Organization: Marshall University

------SPOILERS------AHEAD------->



Just saw Single White Female. Overall, I liked it. It was well acted,
with a pretty good story line and some interesting scenes. I did get a
little annoyed toward the end, however, when the evil-doer kept escaping
being caught or stopped by the skin of her teeth over and over again so
*many* times. I'd like to watch the film again just to count how many;
must've been at least eight, maybe twelve times. At one point I wanted
to stand up and shout at the screen: "WILL THE *NEXT* PERSON TO TEMPORARILY
IMMOBILIZE THE KILLER *PLEASE* REMEMBER TO TAKE THAT *GUN* AWAY FROM HER *THANK
YOU VERY MUCH*!"

..Still, I recommend the movie; it's very much worth seeing. It was kind of
like Basic Instinct where the ending kept being drawn out and drawn out
and drawn out. It was thrilling, because it was well done, but it did
get on one's nerves just a little.

--danny
-- 
	"Were his solid black square paintings really,
	as the artist claimed, simply neutral, abstract
	compositions devoid of external references and
	meanings?" ***********************************
From: wwr@calmasd.prime.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: EMBARRASSING:  JOE V VOLCANO??
Date: 4 Sep 92 18:47:49 GMT
Organization: Computervision - A Division of Prime Computer

In article <1992Sep4.001025.24164@morrow.stanford.edu>, HF.SKW@forsythe.stanford.edu (Susan Wandling) writes:
> I can't remain silent any longer:  TWO of my all-time favorite
> comedies have been bashed on the "Really Embarrassing" thread.  All
> I can say is:  You just didn't get it!  "Planes Trains and Autos" is
> definitely Hughes' best, which may not be saying much, but how can
> you bash the Martin/Candy duo?  I've heard it said that the comedy
> was a bit mean-spirited, but that aside, it's a film I never tire of
> watching!!  Secondly, "Joe vs the Volcano."  Again, I think, a
> nearly great comedy.  Sure it's a joke once they get to the
> island of Pukapuka or whatever it is, but up to then, it's a blast
> to watch Ryan's three (four?) characters and Hanks' version of
> hypochondria.  I know I'm in the minority on this last endorsement,
> but like I said, it was too much when they both got bashed.
> Maybe not everyone's favorite, but it's hard to believe these are
> really ranking that low (MOST embarrassing?) with anyone.

	Planes, Trains, and Autos was listed as embarassing!!  
	It's embarassing that someone would even nominate that film.  No
accounting for taste, eh?  No, it's not `art', and it's not going to win any
acdemy awards, but as a story, as entertainment - a class act.

	John Patrick Shanly, writer of Joe vs. the Volcano, has been a noted
playwriter for some time (of course, I didn't know that b4 I saw the film), and
he wrote a film with subtlety and subtext.  This isn't only a "film"; it's
poetry.  Can't blame most people for not liking it.  It's unconventional, and
wasn't anything that anyone would've expected to see from the ad campaign on
this film.  Regardless, this film is beautiful, full of empathy for the human
condition.

> 
> BTW, my vote goes to "Life Force"  (mentioned a couple times I
> think)

	My vote goes to "Until the End of the World" w/Will hurt... bowser
city.

walter
From: fox@cs.nyu.edu (David Fox)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: sex in movies
Date: 2 Sep 92 13:53:03 GMT
	<6089@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences

In article <6089@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil> jxxl@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke) writes:

   avik@icase.edu (Avik Banerjee) writes:
   # > Take a broad example. Two characters are having an important >
   # conversation.  Behind them you see an orgy visible through >
   # their neighbor's window. The orgy, and the neighbors, are >
   # irrelevant to the plot or the milieu of the film.  Do you still >
   # get the full impact of the conversation? No, because you waste >
   # concentration trying to fathom the significance of the orgy.
   # 
   # thats taking it to extremes, in that case you could easily give
   # the following example as a counter arguement.
   # 
   # a soldier comes home from a war to his new bride knowing that he
   # will have to go into battle the next day and probably die. the
   # couple spend the night playing checkers and when he walks out the
   # door the next day, they exchange a warm handshake.
   # 
   # this is about as realistic as your example above.

   The issue was whether harm was done by *unnecessary* sex scenes, not
   whether sex should be completely eliminated.

The problem is that the only such scene actually mentioned was
one from "Doc Hollywood" which I haven't seen.  This one example
has been ballooned into the assertion that the whole movie
industry is awash with out of context sex scenes.  Those who are
arguing this point rarely come up with actual examples, but
rather rely on the amount of sex of any kind in movies.  In my
opinion what they are really talking about is that they wish
there was less sex in movies altogether.  If not, lets hear
some statistics about what percentage of movies contain out
of context sex scenes, and what percentage of screen time
those scenes use.

-david

"Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fullness
of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters,
neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy."

Ezekiel 16:49-50
From: ab4n+@andrew.cmu.edu (Anish Bharat Bhimani)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Film with the fe/malest cast
Date: 2 Sep 92 03:42:18 GMT
	<CHARLIE.92Aug28155049@charlie.uk.tele.nokia.fi>
	<TOZAKI.92Sep2063224@radish.math.keio.ac.jp>
Organization: Masters student, Information Networking Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Films with few or no women:

Dr. Strangelove - I don't recall any women at all

Lawrence of Arabia - I think

First Blood - only 1 woman, the waitress

Hunt for Red October - only Catherine and Sally Ryan, for about 2
seconds, and a stewardess, for about 1.

Sleuth - only 2 characters, both male

I'm sure there are more . . .

- Anish
From: hist1261@waikato.ac.nz
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Woody Allen / Mia Farrow
Date: 24 Aug 92 11:25:56 +1200
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

In article <1992Aug20.023225.26507@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu>, bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Robert Church) writes:
> In article <1743@hsdndev.UUCP> nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder 432-4219) writes:
> 
>>Before,I go,I'll ask all of you one question with a straight face :
>>How has the news of Paul Reubens beating off in a Florida X-rated movie
>>theater affected your daily life when you first heard about it?
> 
> It made me decide that if I ever did go into a movie house to masturbate
> I would take a cooked sweet potato along. Then, if caught, I'd quickly
> shove it up my ass. Then I'd get a grant as a performance artist instead
> of being arrested.
> 
> 
> -- 
> *********************************************
> *    bob church                             *
> *    bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu           *
> *    D-8195 NFS #27                         *

Bravo, Bob!  This is the best joke I've ever read on any newsgroup.  Keep up
the good work.

Richard.
From: dkrause@hydra.acs.uci.edu (Doug Krause)
Subject: Re: Film with the least actors
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 28 Aug 92 09:08:42 GMT


"Same Time Next Year".  Focuses on two people with a couple of
extras here and there.

Douglas Krause                      One yuppie can ruin your whole day.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
University of California, Irvine    Internet: dkrause@orion.oac.uci.edu
Welcome to Irvine:  Yuppieland USA  BITNET: DJKrause@uci.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten)
Subject: Re: Apocalypse Now query
Summary: Narration
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 18:11:50 GMT

In article <1992Sep3.161051.290@dct.ac.uk>, mctsrj@dct.ac.uk writes:
> Something has been puzzling me for a while.
> Its a while since I have seen Apocalypse Now, but I seem to
> remember that the narration was credited to someone other
> than Martin Sheen, although the voice sounds exactly like
> Sheen's?
> 
> I s my recollection correct, and if so why didn't Sheen do
> the narration?
> Can anyone help?
> Cheers

I was fooled too, until I saw the credits.  STill hard to believe
it wasn't him when I heard it again.  However, I read that he
had a heart attack during filming, so they must have gotten someone
to "do" his voice.


marc colten
From: stantz@sierra.corp.sgi.com (Mark Stantz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Army of Darkness (aka MidEvil Dead aka Evil Dead III) release date?
Date: 27 Aug 92 20:27:02 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.


	Any word on when/if Army of Darkness will be opening yet?

	-mfs
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rao@moose.cccs.umn.edu (Rao V. Akella)
Subject: Re: Best War Movies?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Reply-To: rao@moose.cccs.umn.edu
Organization: Colon Cancer Control Study, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
X-Lunar-Date: 2 days, 8 hrs, 31 mins until the new moon (U.T.)
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 23:08:00 GMT

In article <1992Aug25.021913.16096@cos.com>, cooper@cos.com (Gary Cooper) writes:
> In <charlesk.713582734@sfu.ca> charlesk@fraser.sfu.ca (Charles Hak Kim) writes:
>  
> >Midway			- the ultimate carrier battle movie.
>  
> got this one on LB/LD - I wish they'd left out the "son in love with
> a stinkin' Jap" bit, though 

I guess they wanted to introduce the internment of Japanese-Americans somehow,
so maybe this seemed like a good idea at the time.

BTW, the version of "Midway" on sale in the video stores is about 40 minutes
shorter than the one shown on cable (I taped it off TBS).  What's missing in
the shorter version is Heston's love affair with some blonde at Pearl (and you
thought the "son in love" bit was bad! :-), and, more importantly, the entire
Coral Sea action has been cut, including the loss of the Lexington (granted,
this wasn't central to Midway, but it was an important prelude to it, since the
Japanese thought they had damaged the Yorktown badly enough that they never
expected to see her at Midway).
-- 
Rao Akella, Research Assistant           Internet:   rao@moose.cccs.umn.edu
Colon Cancer Control Study               Bitnet:     rao%moose@umnacvx
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis     NIC Handle: RVA3
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN)
Subject: Re: Most Maddening Movie
Organization: Ostfold College
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 10:20:44 GMT

>>
>>Here's a new topic: which movie made you the angriest? For whatever
>>reason.
>>

>Good idea. It's not too often that I get Mad at a movie, but I think
>"Bloodsucking Freaks" made me maddest. I rented it on video at the 
>insistence of some friends. Stupid, mean-spirited, badly lit and shot,
>sexist to the extreme, and just plain dumb! The acting was suprisingly
>tolerable, which gives the film a very weird feel. The effects were
>quite amateurish too. Pissed me off for a week!

What could you possibly expect from a stupid title like 'Bloodsucking 
Freaks' ???

Personally I LOVE stupid, mean-spirited, badly lit and shot, sexist to 
the extreme horror films :-D

Jorn ... (jorngh@sofus.dhhalden.no)
From: dcha@flex.com (Douglas Cha)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Fright Night (was re: Dracula)
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 20:28:13 HST
Organization: Flex Information Network [Hawaii] 808.531.3539

cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:

> 
> It's unfortunate that the scene in Richard Matheson's _I Am Legend_
> where he finds out that he needs a Star of David for the vampire
> next door didn't make it into the 1962 version starring Vincent
> Price.
> 
> It all makes sense, in a weird sort of way.

Wait a minute..  Is that the same story "I am Legend" that they had done 
a comic book graphic novel on?  If it's a good story, I'll go rent it and 
check it out.
        
---------------------
"One man can't presume to judge mankind" -Char Aznable UC0093
Doug Cha         dcha@flex.com      doug_cha-uhmanoa@uhplato.bitnet
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:26433 alt.cult-movies:7278
From: epp@mala.bc.ca (Lorne Epp)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 1 Sep 92 15:47:59 -0700
Organization: Malaspina College

In article <1992Sep1.130023.6901@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg>, gckchin@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Kelvyn Chin) writes:
> But my ultimate
> worst movie was a cheap Z-grade piece of shit which I can't even re-
> member the name. It was about an Egyptian curse (or something) and
> the bad guy (or girl, can't recall) places a beetle on the good guys
> chest and the beetle burrows its way into the guys chest. That's all
> I remember.
> 
That was _The Tomb_ by Fred Olen Ray.  His movies are invariably
cheap Z-grade pieces of shit, but can be enjoyable as such if you
know what you're getting.  _The Tomb_ is supposed to be one of
his better efforts, but I found it pretty soporific.  Better are _Hell
Comes to Frogtown_ and _Eviltoons_, although they won't win any
Oscars.  I haven't seen _Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers_, but it is 
supposed to be great.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lorne Epp                                               epp@mala.bc.ca
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: donnell@squid.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: none
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 05:06:10 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.154800.725@mala.bc.ca> epp@mala.bc.ca (Lorne Epp) writes:
>In article <1992Sep1.130023.6901@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg>, gckchin@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Kelvyn Chin) writes:
>> But my ultimate
>> worst movie was a cheap Z-grade piece of shit which I can't even re-
>> member the name. It was about an Egyptian curse (or something) and
>> the bad guy (or girl, can't recall) places a beetle on the good guys
>> chest and the beetle burrows its way into the guys chest. That's all
>> I remember.
>> 
>That was _The Tomb_ by Fred Olen Ray.  His movies are invariably
>cheap Z-grade pieces of shit, but can be enjoyable as such if you
>know what you're getting.  _The Tomb_ is supposed to be one of
>his better efforts, but I found it pretty soporific.  Better are _Hell
>Comes to Frogtown_ and _Eviltoons_, although they won't win any
>Oscars.  I haven't seen _Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers_, but it is 
>supposed to be great.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Lorne Epp                                               epp@mala.bc.ca

Great is perhaps too strong a word. Fun, cheesy, stuoopid, stupefying,
are more appropriate. I almost fell asleep, but then it was revealed that
this was an ancient cult that worshipped the chainsaw. That and linnea 
Quigley kept me going. not as bad, as say, "Gore-Met Zombie chef from 
Hell", but close.

					--Judex--
  

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: k3mi@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Brian d'Auriol)
Subject: question on Ice Station Zeebra
Organization: University of New Brunswick
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 15:30:34 GMT

I'm putting it blanks for spoiler protection...



























Hello,  this is the first time I'm posting to this newsgroup, so...

A few days ago I rented this movie (I had seen it a long, long time ago but
do not remember it).  Most of the movie follows the book by the same name
(by A. MacLean), except for the ending.  The ending confuses me.  Thus I
ask, am I the only one that had trouble following the movie?  Who was the bad
guy?  Did the film get destroyed?  

Thanks to any who respond

Brian d'Auriol
k3mi@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca
From: graham@ug.cs.dal.ca (Michael Graham)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Best shots wanted
Date: 29 Aug 92 20:07:08 GMT
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

In article <1992Aug28.033639.6807@news.columbia.edu> egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:
>In article <1992Aug27.191952.10440@midway.uchicago.edu> gre2@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>>
>>	Speaking of great shots from the terminator movies, my favorite shot
>>from T2 is the image of Arnold's foot crushing the roses.

I want a HUGE poster or the T-800's metal face coming through the flames
during the opening of the movie.

I also liked the flaming car in Christine - amazing shot!

mike

-- 
**************************************************************************
Bjork sounds so good, that if I were a singer trying to make a living today    
I'd shoot myself in desperation of ever equalling her  -  Barbara Ellen, NME
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: acker@tfs.com (James Acker)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: TRW Financial Systems
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 19:15:55 GMT

	St. Elmos Fire. Walked out. nuff said.





Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: "Paul Hager" <hagerp@moose.cs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Name this Coen/Raimi movie
Organization: Computer Science, Indiana University
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 22:14:42 -0500


I am posting this for a person who is having difficulty
accessing rec.arts.movies.

----------------------cut------------------------------------

I caught a part of a movie on HBO that was written by:
Coen Brothers and Sam Raimi

Co-Produced by, and starring, Bruce Campbell.

The setting seemed to be something like Chicago in the
40's or 50's (didn't really watch enough to really know).

There was a fat, raving psychopath trying to break into
a ladies apt while she was inside, watching him on some
sort of closed circuit in the hallway.

There was also another lady and a guy eating at a restaurant,
but having no money to pay, then they enter a dance contest
to try to win, but end of washing dishes.

The thing that really caught my attention was of a black
guy falling out of an apt very high up, landing on the
pavement, unhurt, gets up and starts laughing hysterically,
then gets run over by a truck...classic Sam Raimi material.

What is this called??? What are the opinions of it?


I was under the impression that the Coens had only done 4
movies:

Blood Simple
Raising Arizona
Miller's Crossing
Barton Fink

Are there actually more movies out there that they wrote, but
did not direct?
And what about this Raimi/Coen collaboration? Anything more
like it?

I know that there are Raimi relatives out there on the net -
do you know about any of this.

Jeff Schneiter
jeffs@almaden.ibm.com

---------------------thanks------------------------------------

-- 
paul hager		hagerp@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu

"The most formidable weapon against errors of every kind is reason."
			-- Thomas Paine, _The Age of Reason_
From: das@voodoo.boeing.com (Deb Schwartz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: great voices
Date: 28 Aug 92 16:38:32 GMT
Organization: Yet Another Graphics Project, Bellevue, WA

>>   the story thus far:
>>
>>> James Earl Jones
>>> Burt Lancaster
>>> Jack Palance
>>> Clu Gulager [????]
>>> June Allison
>>> Gregory Peck
>>
>>Jean Arthur : the best
>>Candy Clark : "Do you think you can get us some broooooo?"
>

Lauren Bacall: "You know how to whistle, don't you?"

-----
Debbie Schwartz // das@voodoo.boeing.com  // or uunet!bcstec!voodoo!das 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: pfeiffer@nmsu.edu (Joe Pfeiffer)
Subject: Re: Best gun shots...... 
Organization: NMSU Computer Science
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 21:38:28 GMT

Gotta be the long shot in Blazing Saddles!

-Joe.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
Subject: Re: Most ridiculous sex scene (in a movie - not real life)
Organization: Marriott Library, University of Utah
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 02:13:13 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.225111.18780@ichips.intel.com> jreece@sousa.intel.com (John Reece) writes:

>In article <1992Aug30.132007.12372@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, ren@Turing.ORG (Karen Prestemon) writes:
>> 
>> Although this post is a confession that I actually saw this stupid movie,
>> (on video, though!!) how about HOWARD THE DUCK??


>The scene in "9-1/2 Weeks" where Kim Basinger and Mickey Rourke have at
>it in an alley in a downpour.  Looks great, but the water had to be *cold*,
>not to mention disgustingly filthy.  

>In "Basic Instinct" where Sharon Stone is doing her patented ride-em cowgirl 
>bit.  Each bounce seemed to go about 3 feet into the air.

Well then, chock one up for Michael Douglas ;-)


Jeff Jonsson
Marriott Library System Support, University of Utah.
==============================================================================
--"It's the sound of the secret--  jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
-- machinery at the center of  --  jjonsson@utahlib.bitnet
-- the world." -Cliff Steele   --  "You talkin' to me?"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.tv.twin-peaks
From: vnend@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (D. W. James)
Subject: Re: Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (minor spoilers)
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 20:50:24 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.155146.3386@rtsg.mot.com> iott@rtsg.mot.com (Joel K. Iott) writes:

)What is the symbolism of the White Horse that Mrs. Palmer sees in her visions?

	As in the show, death.
 
)Is the Number 6 on the pole next to the "mystery trailer" supposed to mean
)something? (Lynch shows it several times)

	Three times, perhaps?
 
-- 
Vnend, Lottery winner #316                 Ignorance is the mother of adventure.  
vnend@princeton.edu, vnend@pucc.bitnet, or {backbone}!princeton!nudity!vnend        
        Anonymous posting service (NO FLAMES!):vnend@ms.uky.edu                          
"Show me a hero and I will write you a tragedy."