HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith)
Subject: Re: Novice question
Organization: Univ. of North Carolina @ Wilmington
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 06:17:11 GMT

roberto@foggia.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Roberto Ricca) writes:

>Just out of curiosity, I was wondering which record, between 10-6
>and 9-5-2, was the better one. In the 10-6 case, you get a better 
>winning percentage (10/16 vs 9/16); in the 9-5-2 case, you get a
>better win/loss ratio (9/14 vs 10/16). To add more confusion, if a
>tie counts exactly like a half win, the two records are dead even.

>Could anyone enlighten me?
>Thanks a lot.

There is no difference (at least to the NFL) between 10-6 and 9-5-2.
Both have a winning percentage of .625. A tie counts as 1/2 a win and
1/2 a loss, so in reality the 9-5-2 team IS 10-6 for determing percentages.
A better answer might be that a 9-4-3 team finishes AHEAD of a 10-6 team
(.656 vs .625). 

If two teams finished 10-6 and 9-5-2 in the same division, normal tie
breaking prodecures would apply. (IE head-to-head, division win %, conf
win %, common games win %, best net points in division, best net points
in all games, strength of shedule, best net TDs in all games, coin toss).

>########################################################################
># Roberto Ricca                 Email:      roberto@oas.olivetti.com   #
># 816 So. Saratoga Ave #M304    Phone: Home (+1408) 983-2293           #
># San Jose, CA  95129  -  USA          Work (+1408) 366-3558           #
>#----------------------------------------------------------------------#
>#           1994:   JUVENTUS for the WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP                #
>########################################################################
-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
|rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu           Ross Smith              smith@oscar.udel.edu|
|    "I really hate that dog...." - Dr. Chase Matthews, Pet Semetary 2       |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold)
Subject: Re: MNF announcers
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 21:57:46 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.152817.12544@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>,
q2dt@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Turner) writes:

>        I'm seriously sick of Dan, Frank and Al's obvious jump-on-the
>bandwagon, cheer for-whoever's-winning, biased coverage on MNF.  These
>guys spend more time orgasming over the winning team (especially when it is
>serious contender like the Eagles) than they do calling and analysing the game.

Got to agree with you on this one!  They had me laughing pretty hard
on the couch by the night's end!  They would have been saying the
same glorifying crap about the Cowboys if they would have been on
the winning end of the stick.  I suppose if the Redskins beat the
Broncos next Monday night, they will be talking about how the
Redskins are definitely on the road to repeat. Everybody listen up
now!


                                                    Tony
                                                 GO 49ERS!!!
From: krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: QB stats: Oilers/Moon
Date: 25 Sep 92 16:06:01 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson AZ

In article <47885@shamash.cdc.com> jblixt@mips.COM (jon blixt) writes:
>In article <MekTkHC00iUxA4TXsz@andrew.cmu.edu> jw5f+@andrew.cmu.edu (John Wayne Weber) writes:
>>Hey, I agree totally.  Moon looks so much slower this year.  (I am a
>>Steeler fan so I usually get to see at least one of the Steeler-Oiler
>>games a year.)  I think they miss Drew Hill. Now the only good,
>>experienced reciever they have is Jefferies.
>>
>>jww
>>
>Isn't a guy named Ernest Givins still playing for them?
>
>-Jon

And how about Curtis Duncan?

Ted

-- 
"Vote Democrat.  It's easier than getting a job."

krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu
From: gsh7w@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Thoughts on Keith Jackson & the Dolphins
Keywords: Dolphins, Eagles, TE
Date: 29 Sep 92 21:22:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: murdoch.1992Sep29.212241.14678
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <29SEP199216475625@phobos.ucc.umass.edu>
aesr137@phobos.ucc.umass.edu (Karl Stapelfeldt) writes: 
#The Eagles are losing a good player, and deserve to be compensated
#for this. 

Why? I'm a Dolphin fan first, Eagle fan second, but Norm Brahman had
*AMPLE* opportunity to sign him. When the difference is 1.5 vs 1.3
million per year, Braman could/should have signed him, instead of
playing hardball, and then taking money OFF the table.

I just hope that this doesn't upset too  many Dolphins, who also have
trouble signing their own players.

--
-Greg Hennessy, University of Virginia
 USPS Mail:     Astronomy Department, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475 USA
 Internet:      gsh7w@virginia.edu  
 UUCP:		...!uunet!virginia!gsh7w
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: THE *REAL* FINAL SCORES :)
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 23:09:46 GMT

Atlanta	  31  	Chicago      41  * FINAL   YESSSSS!
Minnesota	  42   	Cincinnati    7  * FINAL   YESSSSS!
Tampa Bay  27		Detroit   23     *  FINAL  Indifferent
Buffalo	41  		New England   7   *  FINAL  Indifferent
Denver	   12 		Cleveland     0   ** FINAL  NO TDs!!
San Diego	 0			Houston       27  *  FINAL  Indifferent

LATE GAMES TO DATE

Miami	19   Seattle  17  * FINAL -  DID I SCARE YOU DOLFANS? :-)
		"Is Miami one of the luckiest teams around or what?"

Pittsburgh  3		Green Bay  17  * FINAL  OH NOOOOOO!

NY Jets    10		LA Rams   18 * FINAL  Who really cares?
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "I have great faith in fools - self-confidence my
   friends call it."        Edgar Allan Poe
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gattuso@ssd.comm.mot.com (Christopher Gattuso)
Subject: Re: Offensive Weapons
Organization: Motorola LMPS
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 19:52:34 GMT
Keywords: n


>>Tony Paige (Best all-around fullback in NFL/leads dolphins in receptions)
>
>Tony Paige is a good player, but I don't see how he can be
>considered the best all-round FB in the NFL if he never runs the
>ball.

Tony Paige cannot touch Brad Muster or Tom Rathman in ALL-AROUND FB in the
NFL.  Muster runs, catches, and blocks very well!!!  Rathman also.  I would
take these over Paige ANY DAY!!!!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: Bring on the FISH
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 13:09:54 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <BvAwz1.5rx@acsu.buffalo.edu>, SFRELIAS@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu writes:
> We in Buffalo waiting for Maimi to come in and show the nation how tuna fish
> is made (A la Buffalo style).
>  
> Anybody knows when was the last time Maimi won in Buffalo?
> I hope we have old peopel on the net.
>  
> GO BILLS>

             I don't know when Miami last beat Buffalo in Buffalo, but
I do know that in the last five years Miami is 1-10 against Buffalo. The
one win being in Miami. I wonder if Keith Jackson will get any playing
time this Sunday? I think this one will be close (under a 7 point margin
of victory). I wonder how Buffalo bugers taste?

                             -doug THE dolfan-
Organization: Central Michigan University
Date: Friday, 2 Oct 1992 21:37:46 EDT
From: <3ZASIB3@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU> Robert Newby
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Ten best rated QB performances ever

I don't remember the exact date but after trailing the '49ers all game long
Roger Staubach ran them into the ground to advance in the playoffs in about
1971 or '72, maybe '73.  I don't know his stats for that game but, in
Candlestick Park, he turned them everyway but 'loose.  It was a part of
that "America's Team" mystique which I cannot stand.  Can anyone fill in the
blanks?  Bob
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: greg@puck.webo.dg.com ()
Subject: Re: Majik Favre update
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 92 16:59:07 GMT
Reply-To: greg@puck.webo.dg.com
Organization: NSDD-X.500, Data General Corp.

In article <1992Sep30.130914.15300@cis.ohio-state.edu>, martens@python.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens) writes:
|> 
|> From the 9/30 USA Today:
|> 
|> "QB Brett Favre is expected to make his second start for the
|> Packers Sunday at Atlanta, giving Don Majkowski (ankle) another
|> week to heal.  'There's still a lot of bleeding and discoloration
|> in the ankle,' coach Mike Holmgren said of Majkowski.  'I would be
|> surprised if he progressed to the point where he could play.'
|> Favre, obtained from Atlanta in the offseason, is looking forward
|> to playing the Falcons:  'It will be fun to go back and be on the
|> other sideline.  I have so many friends on that team.  It would be
|> fun to beat them.'"
|> 
|> My best guess is that Favre will retain the starting job when
|> Majkowski comes back.  Against the Steelers, Favre played better
|> than Majkowski has since '89, and if he continues to perform well
|> I see no reason to put Majik back in.  My main concern is that
|> Favre is young.  Can talent and enthusiasm overcome inexperience?
|> Comments?  Opinions?
|> -- 
|> 
|> -- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)
Considering the brainpower of Mike Holmgren ( Ex-49'ers offensive 
coordinator ) , I don't think so, he looks cool in the the pocket and
pretty accurate from what I've seen, I think Holmgren is the key though,
 Greg
( I don't think so, meaning I don't think youth will get in the way of
Favre )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Quaterbacks:Steve Young the best in the league
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 20:34:58 GMT

In article <jjonsson.164@alexandria.lib.utah.edu> jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu writes:
>In article <90932@netnews.upenn.edu> mckernan@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Robert L Mckernan) writes:
>
>
>
>>       YOU ARE DREAMING MY FRIEND, IF YOU THINK YOUNG IS A BETTER
>>PASSER OR RUNNER THAN RANDALL. JUST COMPARE THE STATS. THE ONLY KNOCK
>>AGAINST RANDALL, AND THIS IS A BIG, ONE, IS THAT HE CAN NOT WIN THE
>>BIG GAME ( i.e. PLAYOFF GAME). BUT STEVE YOUNG HAS NEVER WON ANYTHING 
>>EITHER.  
>
>>       IF A GAME IS ON THE LINE THE ONE QB I WANT (AND I DON'T CARE
>>WHAT KIND OF GAME HE IS HAVING) WOULD BE JOHN ELWAY.
>
>>                               ROB
>
>
>Yeah, Elway's proven many times over he can win the BIG game. ;-)
>
>
>Jeff Jonsson
>Marriott Library System Support, University of Utah.
>==============================================================================
>--"It's the sound of the secret--  jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
>-- machinery at the center of  --  jjonsson@utahlib.bitnet
>-- the world." -Cliff Steele   --  "You talkin' to me?"

Thank You!  I just rolled off my bed......GRINNNNN!  :-)
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "Fact are facts and will not disappear on account of 
   your likes."  -   Jawaharlal Nehru
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mzimmers@netcom.com (Michael Zimmers)
Subject: Niners Beat Aints, Refs
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 04:05:20 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 


CHA-CHING!!  BA-DA-BING!!

Ladies and gentlemen, the above cheer for the New Orleans Aints was
adopted by fans who mimic the sound of cash registers being opened
in order to pay off lousy NFL officials who were obviously trying
to give the game to the Aints.  Thanks to the traditionally stellar
play down the stretch of Aints QB Bobby ("I can say you suck but keep
your mouth shut about me!") Hebert, though, even the zebras couldn't
deprive the Niners of a victory.

OK, enough sarcasm (for the time).  I've seen terrible officiating in 
the past, but I would PAY for the chance to put this squad on the witness
stand to explain their fumble/non-TD call against Jerry Rice in the first
quarter.  What could their rationale possibly have been?  The only way
that Rice doesn't get that TD is if he was down first, in which case no
fumble.  There is absolutely no disputing the fact that the ball broke
the plane of the end zone before it came loose (by contact with the
ground, BTW).  At best, a simply atrocious call.  How do those southern
teams continue to get such great home-town officiating, anyway?

Anyway, it was all for naught, as the teams traded personalities during
the game.  The Aints' Hebert passed effectively all night (until, of
course, the stretch, which is an unreasonable time to expect any Aints
team to perform), but the running game, their usual forte, couldn't
do squat.  The Niners, on the other hand, rushed well all night but
were relatively quiet in the air, especially with Rice, who I think
ended with 2 catches for 5 yards.  And while Niners PK Paul Cofer
performed magnificently with a 3-for-3 FG mark, including two long
ones, and several good kickoffs, Morten Anderson missed one that he
normally makes in his sleep.  That miss was large, because it deprived
the Aints from playing for the tie down the stretch.

All in all, a very satisfying victory for the Niners, in large part
because they overcame several really bad officiating calls against
them to beat a game but outclassed opponent on the road.  The Niners
look solid to meet my prediction of 11-5 (which ought to win the
division), while the Aints' management had better start wondering
seriously whether Hebert is ever going to become the sort of QB that
can win against quality defense.

CHA-CHING!  BA-DA-BING!

One really has to wonder where the Aints would be without the 'dome...
-- 
Michael Zimmers                                    |  Home:  408 996 1984
SoftHelp                                           |  Work:  408 996 1965
Software Solutions for Open Systems                |  Data:  408 996 1974
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The FISH EAT BUFFALFO MEAT!
Keywords: FISH EAT BUFFALO BILLS!
Date: 5 Oct 92 16:57:33 GMT
Organization: Houses of the Holy

In article <1992Oct4.201453.2655@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:

> 
> 
> Thurman Thomas fumbles....another T.O. (5th).
> Machine Gun Kelly is taken out because he cannot shoot
> his guns and is replaced by Frank Wright (WHO??!?!).

As far as I can remember Frank Wright is a very capable backup.
A couple of years ago when Kelly was injured he came in and won like
4 games including a defeat on the Miami Dolphins in December.
-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
From: melissa@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Melissa C Merrill)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: NFC Central
Date: 28 Sep 1992 19:43:44 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <BvAyvI.MFA@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jds23971@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Neff) writes:
>OK, I see next weeks Saints / Lion game to be possibly the 2nd most
>interesting game of the week.  Will the Lions open it back up and
>return to last year's form of being unbeatable at home?  Or will
>they break their home winning streak in style and lose 2 in a row?
>
>I'll bet someone will have an opinion out there somewhere.
>
>My guess:
> Saints  20   Lions  10
>
>Go Bears
	
	I think you are too conservative. I think that the Saints will really
	want some Lion hide, I predict Saints 30 Lions 7. I really hope
	Barry gets stuffed again, I like seeing him get tackled 3-4 yds
	behind the line of scrimmage. I mean its like he gets hit by 3-4
	guys *before* he gets the ball. I think alot of defenses have adjusted
	to him, and he better do something to get back to 100+ games if
	the Lions want to have any chance at a 8-8 season.

	Mark
	GO VIKINGS
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Miami-Buffalo-San Fran
Date: 6 Oct 92 15:32:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: uvmark.1992Oct06.153215.12278
Distribution: usa
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.

In article <1992Oct5.202823.28452@math.ucla.edu> rfedkiw@crenshaw.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:
>In Article 31264, Dave Meeks writes ...
>>Actually, pretty huge lead.  Buffalo not only has to hope for a Miami loss,
>>they have to hope for 2 losses, or that they are the one that gives them
>>one.
>
>Sorry, wrong.
>
>Buffalo beats Raiders... Buffalo 5-1
>Miami loses .... Miami 4-1
>
>Buffalo will be alone in first place.

Ummm.. Miami wins the following week, they are 5-1, they are still in 
first place.  If Buffalo beats the Raiders and Miami losses at home to
the Falcons, the Bills would be a half-game up.  They are still effectively
in 2nd place however, because of the ol' tiebreaker situation.  Buffalo has
to hope that Miami loses 2 games more than they do, or that they beat 
Miami in Miami, and that the margin of victory (all things else being equal)
is greater than 27 points.   Uphill battle and a big blow.
-- 
David T. Meeks                    ||" We are jigsaw pieces, aligned on the 
VMark Software, Inc.              ||  perimeter edge, 
uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  interlocked through a missing piece"
davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||" ...This world is totally Fugazi"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood)
Subject: POOL - Picks for Week #5 (NOTE WEIGHTS) -- REPOST
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 16:54:58 GMT

Week 5
------

PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK THE FORM BEFORE MAILING IT!

Mail this form to davewood@cs.colorado.edu with the word "picks" in the
subject line.  Be sure to choose one and only one team for each game.  Mark
your choice with an 'x' in the appropriate box.  Put your initials after the
word "Initials:" (ON THE SAME LINE!) at the bottom of the form.  If you have
questions about this form, send them with the subject "fbproblem."  If you
still need to sign up, YOU MUST SEND A SEPARATE MESSAGE with the word
"signup" in the subject line.  Do not reply to this message unless it is to
send in your picks.  See the Rules/Signup post for more information.

WEIGHTS: Assign 10 points to 4 different games.
	 Assign  7 points to 5 different games.
	 Assign  5 points to 3 different games.
	 You get 10 points for free since there are only 12 games.

This form is due at 10 am PST (5 pm GMT) on Sunday, Oct 4.  NO EXCEPTIONS!

DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE!

 WT  Away                       Home
*------------------------------------------------*
[  ] [ ] Indianapolis		[ ] Tampa Bay   
[  ] [ ] Chicago		[ ] Minnesota        
[  ] [ ] Green Bay		[ ] Atlanta        
[  ] [ ] New Orleans		[ ] Detroit      
[  ] [ ] Miami			[ ] Buffalo            
[  ] [ ] LA Rams		[ ] San Francisco    
[  ] [ ] NY Giants		[ ] LA Raiders     
[  ] [ ] Washington		[ ] Phoenix       
[  ] [ ] Kansas City		[ ] Denver       
[  ] [ ] Seattle		[ ] San Diego        
[  ] [ ] New England		[ ] NY Jets      
[  ] [ ] Dallas			[ ] Philadelphia      
                               
Initials: 

DID YOU PUT YOUR INITIALS ON THE SAME LINE AS THE WORD INITIALS???  PLEASE DO!

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Rex Wood -- davewood@cs.colorado.edu -- University of Colorado at Boulder
  BRONCOS!!        R.S.F.P. Internet Football Pool Organizer        BRONCOS!!
                            Owner, Boulder Houlders
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jawebb@atlas.unm.edu (Furry Bunny Feet)
Subject: Re: Best Performance
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 92 23:26:59 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1992Oct5.215427.596@seq.uncwil.edu> rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith) writes:
>   Here is food for thought (ie the stats you want)...
>Joe Montana:
>SB      Opponent          Att  Comp Pct. Yards  Avg.  TD   INT Rating
>-----   ----------------  ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ------
>XVI     Cincinnati          22   14 63.6   157  7.14    1    0  100.0
>XIX     Miami               35   24 68.6   331  9.46    3    0  127.2
>XXIII   Cincinnati          36   23 63.9   357  9.92    2    0  115.2
>XXIV    Denver              29   22 75.9   297 10.24    5    0  147.6
>
>Phil Simms:
>SB      Opponent          Att  Comp Pct. Yards  Avg.  TD   INT Rating
>-----   ----------------  ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ------
>XXI     Denver              25   22 88.0   268 10.72    3    0  150.9 
>
>Highest Completion Pct (Lifetime - min 40 atts)
>-----------------------------------------------
>68.0 Joe Montana, San Francisco 4 games
>63.6 Len Dawson, Kansas City 2 games
>63.4 Bob Greise, Miami 3 games
>
>Highest Completion Pct (Game - min 20 atts)
>-------------------------------------------
>88.0 Phil Simms (25-22)
>75.9 Joe Montana (29-22)
>73.5 Ken Anderson (34-25)
>
>Draw whatever conclusions you will...

	Ok. Joe went to 4 Superbowls and won themn all. Phil went to one and
won (ack).

	I think that's actually the important fact here. Plus Joe beat other
teams than Denver in the SB. All Phil did was get a gimmie game. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James Webb						jawebb@leo.unm.edu

Go Dolphins!!!!!!				Wow. Both my teams can be the
Go Cowboys!!!!!!!			only undefeated in the league.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: d_white@oz.plymouth.edu (Donald A. White)
Subject: Bills
Reply-To: d_white@oz.plymouth.edu (Donald A. White)
Organization: Plymouth State College - Plymouth, N.H.
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 23:15:14 GMT


Well, just got back from the Bills-Patriots game and being a Buffalo
fan, it was a showcase.  Andre Reed was untouchable and the defense,
well, pretty lucky on occasion but consistant.  My man Bruce did get
double and triple teamed however, which bummed me out because I wanted
to see him pound Millen into the dirt.  He seemed kind of unhappy
himself, sitting on the bench like he had given up the winning
touchdown, Bennet was constantly talking to him.  The game was very
exciting, sitting in front of Pat's fans was nice.  They'd complain
"We always get the worst officials."  Pal, 41-7, and your complaining
about the officials.  Come on.  When Lodish scored on a Millen drop,
that was the final slap in the face of another poor showing by the
Patriots.  I am however, surprised again this week with the Patriots
two minute drill.  Millen can pass, and he did have time, why they
don't do it more is beyond me.  The Pat's D probably would have been
more successful if they rushed Kelly more also, he had all the time he
needed, Tippet who?  He was a probowler?  Vauhn also surprised me, he
get plenty of use on kick-off returns this year.  In conclusion, when
the inebriated guy was leaving he yells "See ya in the superbowl,
maybe you guys can win one."  Bud, see if the Patriots can win a game
before you knock a superbowl loser.
					DW
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mcs@fps.com (Mike Sanfratello)
Subject: Re: Okoye, Bills...
Organization: CRAY Research
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 16:57:09 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.033341.7096@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>
>Your thoughts are exactly that, random and with out much thought for the
>turn of events that can turn a game around, i.e., fumbles, safeties,
>*blown calls* or a "lucky" catch. I will not argue that the Bill might
>be beat the Dolphins, but I would not bet my salary on it.
>Would you bet your salary on it? NOT!

No, but I'd bet *your* salary on it!  :~) :~)

mike
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro