From: J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Organization: Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 15:30:45 GMT

In <1992Oct15.031044.24585@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>, dean.kaflowitz writes:

>In article <1992Oct15.022254.26901@muddcs.claremont.edu> weverett@jarthur.clare
>> In article <1992Oct14.165055.8575@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.co
>> >
>> >And with the current economy, a product of that highly
>> >intelligent conservative government we have, the one that
>>  Why who has the most control over our economy? It's congress isn't it?
>> Isn't congress mostly democrat? Now that I've corrected that little
>>misconception of yours, you can replace 'conservative' with 'liberal' and you
>> will be insulting the democrats. That would suggest you certainly shouldn't
>> vote for a democrat for president.
>>  Just something I noticed.

>William, old darling, why is it that when the economy was
>bad the highly popular former president who once played
>supporting actor to a monkey blamed it on the democratic
>president then in office, and then took credit for the
>turnaround in the economy when he came to office, and

Who else could Reagan blame the economy on?  Either the President, the Congress
or even the state legislatures...but they were all Democrat or predominantly
Democrats.  No matter where Reagan found fault with government in 1980, it HAD
to fall on the Democrats.  The Republicans controlled no branches of government
in 1980.  The president was a Democrat, both houses of Congress had a Demo-
cratic majority, and the Supreme Court was mostly liberal in 1980, with most
justices having been appointed by Democrats.

>his vice president, who some would say was a supporting
>actor for a monkey himself, was able to bask happily
>in that warm glow, despite the fact that the president in
>question presided over a loss of seats in the Senate to
>those wicked, evil, cause of all sorrow in the world
>liberal democrats?  (I got lost there in the grammar but
>I think that one worked out.)  Now we find out that it
>is the fault of that evil, wicked, cause of all sorrow in
>the world liberal democratic Congress that is behind
>the poor economy.  So which is it, William?  Is good
>kin...er, President Bush not responsible for the bad economy
>as his predecessor Ronald Reagan was responsible for the
>good, or is good President Bush responsible for the bad
>economy as his predecessor Ronald Reagan was responsible
for the good?

Bush did fail...to stand up to the Democrats in the 1990 tax fiasco.

>A conservative government is an organized hypocrisy.

Hypocrisy?  Hypocrisy is liberals despising school choice while claiming that
they are the "pro-choice" and "anti-monopoly" people.  Hypocrisy is liberals
wanting government out of the womb...until it's time to fund the clinic.
Hypocrisy is liberals wanting to slash defense spending...until it affects an
army base or a large manufacturing plant in their own district.  Hypocrisy is
liberals screaming bloody murder about Republicans looking for dirt on Clinton,
while finding dirt and causing a leak against Clarence Thomas doesn't bother
them a bit.

Besides, I'm voting Libertarian.


Tim Irvin  j056600@lmsc5.is.lmsc.lockheed.com
******************************************************************************
"Take a breath, Al.  Lighten up." -- Dan Quayle to Al Gore, 10/13/92

Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh