HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: winslade@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Winslade)
Subject: Re: The Dan Quayle Macro File
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 19:27:29 GMT

rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:

>Alt-1  Hollywood and the media elite
>Alt-2  Family
>Alt-3  Values
>Alt-4  God
>Alt-5  Beliefs
>Alt-6  Character
>Alt-7  Liberal
>Alt-8  Liberal democratic congress
>Alt-9  Reform agenda
>Alt-0  Heartland

>go to it!

Uh, you forgot a few ... ;-)

Alt-11  Golf
Alt-12  Potatoe
 
Good day        JSW

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford)
Subject: Re: "I can even forgive Bush for Dan Quayle, but not for this."
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 20:58:03 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.175521.10676@athena.cs.uga.edu>, stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton) writes:

    [.... a lot of good stuff deleted ....]
|> I'm not sure if it's "Bush's job to monitor each state's preparadness."
|> You say it isn't, and it may not be.  

Er ... I think Marilyn Quayle has something to do with this.  As I recall,
she wanted *something* to do, so they made her some uppity-up in FEMA -- the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, which is responsible for coordinating
disaster preparations between the federal government and the states.  We
encountered her out here in CA after the Loma Prieta earthquake.

-- 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|    /)                      | Lana Mountford    
|   / /  __    ___    __     | Silicon Graphics  
|__(_/__(__)\__/  )__(__)\__ | Mountain View, CA 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello)
Subject: Re: An official message
Reply-To: bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 03:20:25 GMT


In a previous article, god@white-house.com (You know who) says:

>finger quayle@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu
>[ns1.cc.lehigh.edu]
>----------------------------------------
>         name: QUAYLE, TUCKER DANFORTH
>        email: tdq2@Lehigh.EDU
>         type: p-Undergrad
>----------------------------------------
>

Oh my goodness... this is just too rich!  Who's going to screw up his
courage and ask him to join us on a.f.d-q?

BTW, it was in the news a day or so ago about TDQ's big move into the dorm
at Lehigh.  He moved in a day before the rest of the student body, accompanied
by about a dozen Zecret Zervice agents.  All of the rooms in the dorm have
signs on their doors identifying the occupants thereof, except for those
on the first floor, where the Scion of Dane is lodged.

ObQuaylebash:  You know what kind of BAD KARMA you would have to have to be
born the Sone of Quayle?  Ugh... TDQ must have been some sort of mass child
killer in a former life!  <- a joke.  I don't belive in reincarnation, thank
you.
-- 
Brad Corsello (bsc7@po.cwru.edu) 2L Case Western Reserve Law School
"The Fanaticks have always had a way of affecting to run into Per-
secution, and count vast Merit upon every little Hardship they suffer."
^ J. Swift.  "Factum clarum, jus nebulosum."  Rex v. Haddock.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: alexo+@cs.cmu.edu (Alex Orenshteyn)
Subject: Einstein's brain.
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 11:10:42 GMT

	Somewhere in this country there is a fellow with a medical
degree who got hold of Einstein's brain after the poor chap died.
This medical man from time to time slices off pieces of the brain
to find out just what made Einstein a genuis. I wonder whose brain
he is going get next? Heh, Heh.
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 92 06:59:25 CDT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS, New Orleans, LA

chesnutt@adobe.com (Stan Chesnutt) writes:

> In article <92247.202316KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.
> >>>  So what is going to happen to this thread when Dan is gone?  Who are we
> >>>gonna laugh at?  Who is going to be the new Dan Quayle for the next 4
> >>>years.
> >
> >Well, if the Democrats win, Gore is every bit as laughable as Quayle.
> >If not more.
> >
>
> I think we'll have plenty of politicians to laugh at.  As a former Louisiania
> I don't know if I should laugh or cry about Edwin Edwards and David Duke.
>
> "Tipper the Shrew and Hillary Too!"
>
> --
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Stan Chesnutt,  Adobe Systems                              chesnutt@mv.us.adobe.com

Well, as a Louisianian, I cry.  Edwards isn't fun anymore.  He's as cynical and
obnoxious as Bush.  Now, a Duke-Quayle ticket?  That would be fun.  Family
values, and if you don't like ours, we'll put you on a boat and ship you back!



|Edward J. Branley                         elendil@mintir.New-Orleans.LA.US|
|Seashell Software                                UUCP:  rex!mintir!elendil|
|3508 North Woodlawn Avenue                          Compu$erve: 71237,2227|
|Metairie, LA   70006       voice: +1-504-455-5087     bbs: +1-504-455-8665|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: dianem@boi.hp.com (Diane Mathews)
Subject: Re: Quotes????
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara Division
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 19:41:37 GMT

In article <3871@keele.keele.ac.uk> mad19@seq1.keele.ac.uk (Mr The biggest chauvanist around. =) writes:
>
>Back here in England, he has a slightly poor reputation, and is known
>for putting his foot in it.

Oh please oh please!!!  Tell us more about his reputation, and how he 
attained it (unless it was from US).  If it was from US, then all accounts
are either true or liberal media bias - left for the reader as an exercise.
From: Frederick.A.Ringwald@dartmouth.edu (Frederick A. Ringwald)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Marilyn's lips
Date: 27 Aug 92 04:21:32 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0d56@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <1992Aug21.143830.13695@javelin.sim.es.com>
ronwill@sierra.sim.es.com (Ron Williams) writes:

> I mean, this woman is dog ugly.

Well, it's good to see there's at least SOME justice in this world!
From: stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle/Bush Competency?
Date: 26 Aug 92 04:10:00 GMT
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens

In article <1992Aug25.114434.2017@wkuvx1.bitnet> barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
>
>
>  That's my opinion - it ought to be yours.
>
>                                       Fred
>
>
It OUGHT to be mine? Who let this asshole in on the party? Yo Fred, get
a life and maybe a nice half a brain to accompany what nature graced you
with.  

Cat Stanton
From: tak@tazboy.jpl.nasa.gov (Tom Kreitzberg)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle/Bush Competency?
Date: 25 Aug 92 22:27:15 GMT
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA

In <1992Aug25.114434.2017@wkuvx1.bitnet>, Fred (barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet)
writes:

> A good deal of crime in the southwest US can be attributed to illegal
> immigrants.

A good deal of crime in the southwest US can also be attributed to
U.S. citizens, which means that since Bush's recession -- I'm sorry, 
I mean the Democrat-controlled Congress's recession -- acts to keep people 
from the East Coast from moving to the Southwest, the recession reduces
crime and is a good thing. In which case, I guess it should be called
Bush's recession after all.

As for NAFTA, I'm not sure economic heat death is something to look
forward to, but then I'm not sure it isn't.

> Quayle isn't some bumbling idiot; he's a very competent politician.

Shouldn't that read, "Quayle isn't some bumbling politician; he's
a very competent idiot." ?

> The fact is, liberals who know Quayle's past record, who know what
> Dan Quayle really is like, are _scared_ of him; they have been since
> he was named.

I know something of Quayle's past record and what he really is like, and 
I'm scared, too, though the fear didn't start until midway through his
term as Vice President. The thought of Quayle as President is genuinely
frightening. I just made it worse by imagining that the Republicans gain
control of Congress this year. Eeek!

(Nothing against Republicans gaining control of Congress, but combined
with a Quayle presidency, yeesh.)

> Third, no, Bush has not been the best of Presidents. Yes, he has
> made mistakes. Hig biggest-"read my lips..." ... He let himself
> get put into a bad position, and he paid for it. And, more significantly, 
> he didn't shirk his responsibility in regard to the matter; he willingly 
> took the blame, something I don't remember another politician doing.

He took the blame, but he sure didn't keep it very long.

	Tom
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: Dan's taste in movies and TV
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 18:30:37 GMT

Our Dan is a man of many contradictions, but there's one in particular
I'd like to address, if only so we can have something a little lighter
than usual to discuss in a.f.d-q.  Can anyone reconcile the following,
all of which describe opinions apparently held by Dan:

A) Murphy Brown -- bad show, provides bad role models for children and
   adults alike, an attack on Family Values (tm)

B) The Simpsons -- bad show, provides bad role models for children and
   adults alike, an attack on Family Values (tm)

   (actually, I think GHWB is the one who attacked the Simpsons, but it's
    probably safe to assume Dan shares this opinion)

C) Ferris Bueller's Day Off -- simply the greatest movie ever made

(Disclaimer - this isn't an attack on Ferris Bueller.  I actually enjoyed
 the movie, and it only rotted half my brain. :-))

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: ddaye@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (David C Daye)
Subject: Re: Some rough comparisons
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 12:15:55 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.221348.19550@rchland.ibm.com> jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl) writes:
>
>    [....]                                               If Quayle
>was a big drinker and partier in 1969 (the summer of love) maybe he was

This HAS to be true.  The Summer of Love I remember happened in 1967, so
it would be right in character for DQ to need a couple of years to 
"grow into" it.  The "drinker" bit has to be right, too;  Half a million
Woodstock hippies, and in the middle one frat boy in a suit w/ a martini....

"We can change the world; de-reg-u-lay-ee-ate the world!"  Far out....

Don't know why I'm babbling so much today.  I had breakfast, a brownie
in fact....  Well, time to get back to the stuff that's too true to
be funny.
-------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: wilson@gauss.cs.jhu.edu (Dwight Wilson)
Subject: Re: Quayle/Bush Competency?
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University CS Department
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 15:14:09 GMT

In article <8ebWisq00WBO41uYMz@andrew.cmu.edu> "Joshua M. Sabloff" <jsa5+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>Excerpts from netnews.alt.fan.dan-quayle: 27-Aug-92 Re: Quayle/Bush
>Competency? by Eric Johnson@ccu.umanito 
>> I second this as long as he sticks to McD's or some other place where you
>> have no choice of what goes on your burger. Can you imagine the lineups 
>> at Burger King or Wendy's while the managers fixed his screwups on orders
>> with alternate toppings? Besides, it goes well with his lockstep mode of 
>> thinking.
>
>No, I think Danoe would be quite efficient.  After all, he wouldn't
>offer you a choice; he would put whatever the religious right feels
>should go on your burger. :-)
>

And the company would save money, because he wouldn't be liberal with 
the toppings.

-Dwight
From: howard@netcom.com (Howard Berkey)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Tucker's e-mail
Date: 4 Sep 92 17:54:54 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <92247.160724CLINDSAY@vma.cc.nd.edu> <CLINDSAY@vma.cc.nd.edu> writes:
>I too think that harassing Dano's hapless offspring is poor form, and
>would never do it.  However, think of what the anti-choice fanatics do:
>harassing not only the doctors who work at the clinics but also their
>spouses and children (up to and including death threats).  Some people
>have no class whatsoever.  I for one will never stoop to their level.
>Cathy


Let's just forget about Tucker and move on; I doubt anyone is going to harass 
him via e-mail, and if they did they'd be in over their heads with spooks
following them around which is a lot more pressing reason not to bug him
than warnings by us.  Besides, Tucker may be an O.K. person.

-Howard
-- 
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Howard Berkey						howard@netcom.com
"Jesus Christ, How many people does it TAKE to kill the President?"
		-John Dillinger, in _Illuminatus!_
From: stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: 1 Sep 92 05:20:55 GMT
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens

In article <1992Sep1.023641.7288@leland.Stanford.EDU> wolf@leland.Stanford.EDU (Andy Wolfsberg) writes:
>Didja ever log on when you were in a pissy mood and just get ticked off beyond 
>belief by something stupid that probably wouldn't seem so bad if you weren't
>already feeling pissy???   I guess it's kinda like "you shouldn't get in a car
>and roar off after having a heated arguement with someone."

Hmmmm....yeah.  Then again I have logged on when I was in a fine mood only
to find the innate idiocy and intolerance of some people pissed me off beyond
belief.

>So that's my excuse, but still
If you need to make excuses for your actions you shouldn't post.

>In article <1992Aug31.231915.25213@athena.cs.uga.edu> stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton) writes:
>>dot dot dot
>
>>>anthony (not an american, and glad)
>>catherine (wishing she lived wherever anthony does)
>            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Good, get the hell out of our country twit. We don't want ya anyway. But don't
>moan like that.  For crying out loud, are you forced to go to school in GA? 
>I hardly believe it.  Go somewhere else in the country and you'll find
>change from DEEP SOUTH mentality.  Move to another country and you'll be whining
>for the consumer environment you've got RIGHT HERE in the USA.
>Heck, I despise George and the DANglement as much as the rest of you but this 
>kinda whining makes me wanna barf.

Listen, I do NOT like the way this country is run.  When I express my
dissent about it I expect to get bitched at by a lot of "red-blooded"
"flag-toting" Americans.  However, I am the first to admit that the
"deep south" is anything but DEEP.  And YES I was forced to go to school
in GA because I can't afford out of state tuition because this government
of ours makes it damn near impossible to afford a quality education.

If you're gonna bitch at me don't bitch at me because of where I live.
That's something I can't help.  Can you help that you're such an ass?
No I didn't think so.  So I will lay off for now.

>
>Now that I've got that off my chest (fingertips?), I'll go eat a piece of candy and hope I 
>feel better.
Yeah go wallow in the mundanity of a nice chocolate chip cookie.
Sheesh around here if you don't put smileys after every sarcastic
line (such as the one you underlined of mine above) people take
SUCH offense.


>Andy (I feel the heat already  -- and by the way, did I miss the point. Like, is Anthony
>                                   a major stud and this is love talking, not whining) 
I don't know about Anthony.  However he'd probably be more tolerable to live
near than YOU.

Catherine Stanton
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:3163 alt.politics.bush:3517 alt.politics.clinton:3523
From: pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Subject: Re: Tucker's e-mail
Originator: pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 03:54:21 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.025320.5238@athena.mit.edu> dks@athena.mit.edu (dks) writes:
>
>Unless you'd like your kids held responsible for your crimes,
>please leave the guy alone.  He doesn't need us, we don't need him.

Well stated. Just because this poor sap was unfortunate enough to be born to
the the Danster, that doesn't mean he is anything like his father. The guy
already has enough problems, if what I hear is correct. Can you imagine 
growing up with Danny Boy as your father??????  

>
>Thanks.
>
>
>Dhanesh

Patrick Pape
pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Depressing
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 92 17:01:09 CDT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS, New Orleans, LA


rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:

> In article <XNNcqB1w165w@bluemoon.rn.com> zaphod@bluemoon.rn.com (Peter Bierm
>
> >
> >What's funny is that during the convention, Danny made reference in his
> >speech to himself being a potential canidate in the 1994 election.
> >                                                    ^^^^
> >In what universe?
> >
>
> I hate to jump to DQ's defense, BUT:
>
> 1. This was in an interview, not his speech
>
> 2. This quote actually makes sense. What he said was (paraphrased due to
> poor memory) "Im not worried about 1996. First, we want to get Bush re-
> elected. Then we have to wrry about 1994".
>
> What he means here is first things first. First, the fascists want to win
> the presidency. Then, in  1994, the fascists (oops, republicans) want
> to regain the Congress. Then they can worry about the 1996 election.
>
> It really did make sense, especially for quayle. I even understand his
> position; when youre up against the ropes in 1992, and with a major
> mid-term congressional season coming up in 1994, who cares about 1996?
>
>

I've said this before, but it merits repeating:  Dano's statement about 1994
wasn't a gaffe or a slip of the tounge.  It's real-life planning on his part.
He's going to be out of a job in November.  While most people in government
normally are able to land good jobs in consulting firms, think tanks, etc., and
most political hacks are able to fall on their feet, Dano is shit out of luck.
Sure, Marilyn will be able to be the family bread-winner in '93 by going out on
the neo-nazi lecture circuit, but Dano's 'family values' will force him to run
for Congress in '94, so he can get himself a real job.




|Edward J. Branley                         elendil@mintir.New-Orleans.LA.US|
|Seashell Software                                UUCP:  rex!mintir!elendil|
|3508 North Woodlawn Avenue                          Compu$erve: 71237,2227|
|Metairie, LA   70006       voice: +1-504-455-5087     bbs: +1-504-455-8665|


|Edward J. Branley                         elendil@mintir.New-Orleans.LA.US|
|Seashell Software                                UUCP:  rex!mintir!elendil|
|3508 North Woodlawn Avenue                          Compu$erve: 71237,2227|
|Metairie, LA   70006       voice: +1-504-455-5087     bbs: +1-504-455-8665|
From: narsi@sgi.com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: "Liberal" - A Misnomer
Date: 26 Aug 92 21:46:04 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

In article <1992Aug25.115945.2018@wkuvx1.bitnet> barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
>Let's face it - the term "liberal" is a misnoner.  Some of the 
>most intolerant people I've ever met are liberals . . .

Not possible -
we call such intolerant people "republicans".

>That's my opinion - it ought to be yours.

That's my opinion - but you may make it your own.

-----
narsi


hmm, "intolerant liberal" - a new oxymoron for rec.humor :-)
From: sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: New Abortion Question
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 12:08:24 EDT
Organization: Monsoon Software, Inc.

wjpirkl@iastate.edu (William J Pirkl) writes:

> How about a new question for each of them (Bush/Quayle)??
> Posed with the following problem, what would you do?
> 
> Your happily married daughter (or granddaughter) becomes pregnant.  Her
> husband tells her that if she does not get an abortion, he will divorce 
> her.  She's stuck either way.  If she has the kid, she becomes single.
> If she gets an abortion, she has SINNED, and if Bush has his way, committed
> a crime.  

Bush: "Too hypothetical. If a frog had wings, he wouldn't hit his tail
       on the ground."


Sunil Gupta
Monsoon Software, Inc.
sg@monsoon.com
From: stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: 1 Sep 92 05:22:44 GMT
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens

In article <1992Sep1.030022.6424@rigel.econ.uga.edu> hughes@dogwood.botany.uga.edu (Wayne Hughes) writes:
>In article <1992Sep1.023641.7288@leland.Stanford.EDU> wolf@leland.Stanford.EDU (Andy Wolfsberg) writes:
>    [whiny excuses deleted  :) ]
>>In article <1992Aug31.231915.25213@athena.cs.uga.edu> stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton) writes:
>>>>anthony (not an american, and glad)
>>>catherine (wishing she lived wherever anthony does)
>>            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>    Yeah but cut her some slack, it was the *only* non-sensible thing
>    she said, except maybe that she didn't realize  "nz" was New Zealand.
>    And don't talk about DEEP SOUTH mentality until you've actually
>    *lived* here; it's not nearly what you seem to think.  There's
>    stupidity elsewhere, too, doncha know?  
>
>    Wayne (surprised at his expression of regionalism)

I knew nz was New Zealand.  But hey we've proven these past four years
that a country can run on auto-pilot.  How bad can it be?

Cat
From: shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dan's Kid Conceived Before Marriage?
Date: 31 Aug 92 18:42:23 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

slarsen@copland.helios.nd.edu (susan larsen) writes:

>In article <Aug.28.09.41.00.1992.3911@gandalf.rutgers.edu> shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan) writes:
>>slarsen@schumann.helios.nd.edu (susan larsen) writes:
>>
>>>In article <1992Aug25.205915.3530@beaver.cs.washington.edu> dbj@cs.washington.edu (Dave Johnson) writes:

>matriculating freshman.  Plus, Marilyn strikes me as the 
>kind of person who would be fanatical about taking her exams 
>at the "usual" times (what, wait until December?  what will 
>people think....shudder, shudder)


I have no idea how old the kid is, but I just
wanted to point out that Fall exams are no
more or less usual than Spring exams.  When
do you think students take exams for their
fall classes.  You don't "wait" until December.
Thats when they are given.


-- 
Susan R. Hagan (shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu) 
Publications Coordinator - User Services
Rutgers University Computing Services
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush
From: bgarfink@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (beth diane garfinkel)
Subject: Re: DATELINE: Bush fucks up!
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 19:40:39 GMT

In <1992Aug27.151340.9052@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> ack@dgp.toronto.edu (Andrew Brownbill) writes:

>I just want to get this right. Unwanted teen pregnancies are caused by people
>who want to get pregnant. 

Read _Unfinished Business_ by Maggie Scarf; she discusses the subtleties
of teen pregnancies in depth.  It may seem like a paradox, but it is
often true that teenage girls become pregnant because they want to,
without having thought the whole thing through.

-- 
"Hold stick near center of its length.  Moisten pointed end in mouth.
Insert in tooth space, blunt end next to gum. Use gentle in-out motion."
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle