HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: u2112539@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: First to ask about Emplant?
Date: 29 Jul 92 12:18:51 +1000
Organization: University of New South Wales

In article <1992Jul28.083044.22555@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>, hurtt@tramp.Colorado.EDU (HURTT CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL) writes:
> In article <sbiddle.05xo@aviate.welly.gen.nz> sbiddle@aviate.welly.gen.nz (Steve Biddle) writes:
>>
>>Brings back memories of Amax II+, and of course the Toaster..
>>
> 	Now thats what I'd like to see Emplant do: Toaster Emulation! Just 
> imagine, you could run Lightwave for the mere cost of the 2.0 upgrade. :-)
> Boy, someone could really frost NewTek with something like that.
> 
> 	Chris Hurtt

	?!?!?!? I thought you had a toster emulator. ie. I think it had been
spotted by the name A2000. Lightwave does work pretty well on it although it
prefers to have a sticker over it that says Toster station.

>> Steven Biddle
From: pianoman@misseye.uucp (Alan D. Ray)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Where is CrossDos 5.0?
Date: 20 Jul 92 23:46:01 GMT
Organization: Not an Organization


Anyone hear anything about the (long delayed) release of CrossDos 5.0?
I sent Consultron $25.00 way back on April 28, as well as my original
disk and have heard hide nor hair from them.
And now I hear CrossDos will be in Workbench 2.1...so I really wasted
$25.00, since I intend to get OS 2.1 when available.
I'm really think of writing Consultron and asking for my money back...
they can keep the disk...I now use MultiDos (excellent program), and
find it works better than CrossDos, and is much easier to use also.

Has anyone heard from Consultron lately?


--
**************************************************************************
* Sing me a song           \  Alan D. Ray  /         BERKS AMIGA BBS     *
*  you're the               \ Reading, Pa./          (215)-921-1016      *  
*    pianoman....         *******************                            *
*        B. Joel             uunet!cbmvax!rehab1!misseye!pianoman        *
**************************************************************************
From: pianoman@misseye.uucp (Alan D. Ray)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re:  A3000 <-> IBM disks
Date: 20 Jul 92 23:34:31 GMT
Organization: Not an Organization

In article <Jarrett_Volzer.04qw@neonate.amiga.atl.ga.us> Jarrett_Volzer@neonate.amiga.atl.ga.us (Jarrett Volzer) writes:
>In a message dated Wed 14 Jul 92  8:48, 89u7491@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au
>wrote:
>
>
> > Hi there netland.
> >  What is the best way to read IBM disks on an A3000. Dos2Dos V3
> > will not work. Does crossdoss work OK ?
> >  George
>
>The absolute BEST file transfer program to go from PC to Amiga disks is a
>PD program called Multidos.  This is much easier that CrossDos or the other
>because you just put either type of disk in the drive, and the program
>knows which type it is and you can do a normal file copy (from CLI, or Dir.
>Opus/Diskmaster etc.)  I don't know for sure if it works with the 3000 or
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It does, and in fact, I deleted CrossDos (which I bought), and now use
MultiDos. Works fine on my 3000, and is much easier to use than CrossDos
(IMHO).

>not, but I would guess that it should.
>
>-- Via DLG Pro v0.992

--
**************************************************************************
* Sing me a song           \  Alan D. Ray  /         BERKS AMIGA BBS     *
*  you're the               \ Reading, Pa./          (215)-921-1016      *  
*    pianoman....         *******************                            *
*        B. Joel             uunet!cbmvax!rehab1!misseye!pianoman        *
**************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: gerry@pizzabox.dialogic.com (Gerry Lachac)
Subject: Re: OS/2
Organization: Dialogic Corporation
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 14:36:36 GMT

In article <13613@mindlink.bc.ca> George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca (George Lin) writes:
>> Teddy Wang writes:
>> 
>> think twice about saying OS/2 is EXTREMELY stable.  I've crashed OS/2 on
>> several occasions (But then again I crash DECStations regularly.)
>
>Were you possible running OS/2 on a compatible machine?  Many of OS/2 crashes
>are hardware dependent.  ie.  OS/2 works very well on PS/2 (except for some
>Model 70's), but its stability is highly dependent on the hardware.


Sorry, but this is complete propaganda/rubbish.  OS/2 is very stable
on *many* hardware platforms.  It is definitely not made exclusively
for PS/2's.  I've run OS/2 on at least 5 different architectures, from
Compaq/Dell to build-it-yourselves.  Saying it is "highly dependent on
the hardware" goes the same for DOS, UNIX, and even AmigaDos on
Amigas.  If you've got non-standard hardware, watch out.

OS/2 1.3 is extremely stable.  I've never crashed it from an
application (the drivers I write are a different story :-)  OS/2 2.0
on the other hand, well, let's just remember the days of AmigaDos 1.0.
OK, not that bad, but ".0" products aren't burned in yet.


Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: mrubino@engws10.ic.sunysb.edu (Michael N Rubino)
Subject: EMPLANT Update.
Originator: mrubino@engws10.ic.sunysb.edu
Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 21:39:17 GMT


I called Utilities Unlimited today to see what was up with EMPLANT.  Mr. Drew
was not in (he's only there on Fridays) but the secretary told me that
EMPLANT will be available around August 15th.  I'll call Jim on Friday to get
a confirmation of that date.  When I do I'll let everyone know.


-- 

- Mike
  mrubino%csws1.ic.sunysb.edu@sunysb.edu <--- use this address for email.
  
From: mikep@hpmwtd.sr.hp.com (Mike Powell)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 04:05:52 GMT
Subject: Re: Atari ST Emulator??
Organization: HP Santa Rosa Site (NMD MTA MWTD)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations

	
	Matt....

	I have asked about the availability of ST emulators for
	well over a year.... and no one that I have ever talked
	to has actually said that they have one, or if there really
	is one that works.... (just second hand rumors).

	I have been trying to get one for about three years now.
	I was burned back then by sending $50 to AIR limited in
	England.... and they never sent me product or a refund.

	I'm beginning to believe that none exists, nor has one
	ever existed...  :-)

	But if you ever come across one, anywhere for _any_ price
	please let me know.  I will climb high mountains and swim
	oceans to obtain it.

	-Mike-   (the guy without ftp capibility)
From: celentano@cdc835.cdc.polimi.it
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: AMax Plus and Mac diskettes
Date: 24 Jul 92 17:19:10 GMT
Organization: C.d.C., Politecnico di Milano

Has anyone used AMaX II plus to format and drive Mac diskettes in
Amiga drives?
I get write errors after 500 Kbytes (on blank disk). I called ReadySoft,
sent them by board for repair, got it back repaired (I suppose), but it
still doesn't work.
My configuration is Amiga 2000, GVP Impact Rom 4.0 46Mb HD, 1Mb chip, 
2 Mb Fast, Deinterlacer, A2286.

Thanks in advance for your help, please e-mail, I will re-post the answers.

Augusto Celentano
Politecnico di Milano
Milano, Italy
auce@ipmel2.elet.polimi.it
From: George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca (George Lin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: OS/2
Date: 21 Jul 92 21:31:31 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: world

> Teddy Wang writes:
> 
> Don't forget that OS/2 is also a full 32 bit OS, like modern UNIX.  But I'd
> think twice about saying OS/2 is EXTREMELY stable.  I've crashed OS/2 on
> several occasions (But then again I crash DECStations regularly.)
>          Teddy Wang                                    TW5232@ALBNYVMS.BITNET


Were you possible running OS/2 on a compatible machine?  Many of OS/2 crashes
are hardware dependent.  ie.  OS/2 works very well on PS/2 (except for some
Model 70's), but its stability is highly dependent on the hardware.
Yes, OS/2 crashes, but about once a month for me, while my Amiga crashes every
few days.

--

 -------------------------------------------
| George Lin                  | 145.270 MHz |
| George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca   |   VE7FKU    |
 -------------------------------------------
From: mrubino@engws9.ic.sunysb.edu (Michael N Rubino)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: EMPLANT Update.
Date: 28 Jul 92 03:03:24 GMT
Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook

In article <27JUL199218580460@venus.tamu.edu> cpw8034@venus.tamu.edu (ALAN CHIPIN WEN (409)693-2924) writes:
>But in all honesty and reality, I'll be thoroughly satisfied if it's coming
>out at Christmas with the 486 and Quadra emulation as stable as promised.  I'm
>willing to pay twice of what Mr. Drew has advertised if it does so.  Really,
>$700 is a helluva good deal for two heavy weight computers (add a bit more for
>the roms and such too).

Shhh, Jim might hear you.  Don't give him any ideas.

>In the meantime though, I would like to see a reputable magazine get a hold
>of even the normal MacII emulation and calm all believers and non-believers (me)
>before we deface Utility Unlimited's name any further.

Ditto.

>alan



-- 

- Mike
  mrubino%csws1.ic.sunysb.edu@sunysb.edu <--- use this address for email.
  
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: kopackm@lonex.rl.af.mil (Michael A. Kopack)
Subject: Re: First to ask about Emplant?
Organization: RL
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 12:39:21 GMT

Hey guys, give the man a chance, will ya? After all, he did say in a previous
posting (around the end of June/beginning of July) that he had to redesign
the board to fix a few boo-boos, and a new feature or two and that they still
hadn't gotten their FCC approval. He also stated that because of these problems,
EMPLANT might not be ready for the 3rd week of July deadline, but more realistically,
the 2-3 week of August. After all, even if he did get the FFC approval that
next day, he'd have to get the board design to the PCB people, have them
run several hundred (possibly thousands) and then solder in all the parts.
Then you have to test them, reproduct the software, package them .......

Look, I know we're all getting anxious to see this thing and get our hand
on it. But, let's give Mr. Drew a little more time before we cut off his
head. Even the best planned projects can run into problems which slow them
down. 

--Mike Kopack

PS. Please don't make a fool out of me Mr. Drew !!!!!!!


-- 
Mike Kopack                         | Sex, Drugs, Rock & Roll and my Amiga,
Internet : gt6758b@prism.gatech.edu | what more could anyone want?
           kopack@bugs.rl.af.mil    \              -- Me 
           kopackm@lonex.rl.af.mil   -------------------------------------------
From: Fred_M_Hamilton@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: First to ask about Emplant?
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 06:45:58 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world
  <21JUL199217034079@venus.tamu.edu>
  <1992Jul21.223346.8173@nntp.uoregon.edu> <Brrx09.Int@DMI.USherb.CA>


Surely if Mr. Drew and Co. are just waiting for FCC approval, they could show
the board to Amiga World, Harv, or SOME third party that we can all trust. 

(Just trying to stir up the water a bit-there hasn't been a nutty IMPLANT 
escalation on the net for over a month now. :-)

But I do have a point...

-Fred
From: Erik_Topsholm@f231.n901.z92.badnet.bad.se (Erik Topsholm)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Connecting 3.5 Drive to A2088
Date: 30 Jul 92 19:48:19 GMT
Reply-To: Erik_Topsholm@f231.n901.z92.badnet.bad.se (Erik Topsholm)
Organization: ANet Development, Marsta, SWEDEN
OD-Comment-To: Tom_Gowdyk

It dosen't work. PC/XT can only read 720 kb 3,5". Sorry...

--- 
From: mikep@hpmwtd.sr.hp.com (Mike Powell)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 04:00:09 GMT
Subject: Re: First to ask about Emplant?
Organization: HP Santa Rosa Site (NMD MTA MWTD)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations

	
	I have literature about it in front of me, and I have
	read about it in Amiga world.....


	What are you guys talking about?

	-Mike-
From: rcbi110@muvms3.bitnet (R. ALAN MONROE)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: EMPLANT Update.
Date: 28 Jul 92 11:06:42 GMT
Article-I.D.: muvms3.112093
Organization: Marshall University


> In the meantime though, I would like to see a reputable magazine get a hold
> of even the normal MacII emulation and calm all believers and non-believers

Yeah this would be great.  But remember, it takes up to 3 months to go from a
pen-scratched text, to a printed color mag on the stands, right?
So the mag would've had to have the proto a while back to get it into a current
mag.

((   ||  /\\ \\  / /\\  ((      R. Alan Monroe       (( "What a balmy       ((
 )) _// /--\\ \\/ /--\\  )) rcbi110@muvms3.wvnet.edu  )) night.."-Geddy Lee  ))
((              _       ((                           ((  @ Star Lake on the ((
 ))  ||  /\\  //  ||_/   ))    Pinkwater Rules!       )) coldest first day   ))
((  _// /--\\ \\_ || \  ((            :^)            ((  of summer ever     ((
From: smythe@cats.ucsc.edu (Brian Matthew Aljian)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: First to ask about Emplant?
Date: 24 Jul 92 22:29:19 GMT
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
NNTP-Posting-Host: am.ucsc.edu


In article <l70mi6INNaen@utkcs2.cs.utk.edu> levi@galoob.cs.utk.edu (David Levi) writes:
>If everybody is so desparate to know if Emplant is finished, why not contact
>the FCC and ask if it really is being tested for their approval.  I'd imagine
>it's not any secret that they couldn't tell you.  I don't know how to
>contact them though........
>-- 
>-Dave Levi     levi@cs.utk.edu

Just curious... how long does an FCC approval usually take?  Anybody have any
experience in this domain?

-- 
   Brian M. Aljian
   smythe@stallion.santa-cruz.ca.us
From: SBACIR2@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: OS/2
Date: 24 Jul 92 12:11:31 GMT
Organization: University of Florida, NERDC

In article <s_fuller.711588979@vincent1.iastate.edu>
s_fuller@iastate.edu (Steve Fuller) writes:
 
>
>We are running OS/2 2.0 on a PS/2 56sx here at my place of
>employment. The machine has 4 megs of ram in it and boy it is DOG
>slow. I think that Windows 3.1 on a 12 MHz 286...
 
I'm running OS/2 2.0 on an IBM PS/2 70-A21.  To run Communications
Manager and IBM's TCP/IP I had to go to 12M of memory.
 
BTW, anyone know of TCP/IP w/SLIP for the AMIGA w/o UNIX.
 
d.GAP /// also wizard@gap.sbac.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: gerald@seas.gwu.edu (Gerald G. Washington)
Subject: Re: OS/2
Organization: George Washington University
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 17:26:52 GMT

gerry@pizzabox.dialogic.com (Gerry Lachac) writes:
>George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca (George Lin) writes:
>>Were you possible running OS/2 on a compatible machine?  Many of OS/2 crashes
>>are hardware dependent.  ie.  OS/2 works very well on PS/2 (except for some
>>Model 70's), but its stability is highly dependent on the hardware.
>
>Sorry, but this is complete propaganda/rubbish.  OS/2 is very stable
>on *many* hardware platforms.  It is definitely not made exclusively
>for PS/2's.  I've run OS/2 on at least 5 different architectures, from
>Compaq/Dell to build-it-yourselves.  Saying it is "highly dependent on
>the hardware" goes the same for DOS, UNIX, and even AmigaDos on
>Amigas.  If you've got non-standard hardware, watch out.

OS/2 is also not an Amiga operating system.  Are we speaking here of the
possibilities of running OS/2 using Emplant, or are we just wasting
bandwidth?

-- Gerald
From: jason@edsi.plexus.COM (Jason White)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: First to ask about Emplant?
Date: 26 Jul 92 03:11:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: edsi.1992Jul26.031124.628
Organization: Enterprise Data Systems Incorporated, Appleton WI

vailm00@DMI.USherb.CA (MARC VAILLANCOURT) writes:

>   Well, I sent a message to Jim asking him what was the point in offering
>his services to another company just before the "release" of EMPLANT, here's
>what he replied to me:

>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Well, because I am done with EMPLANT....we are waiting on FCC approval,
>and I have nothing to do.  :-)                                         
>                                                                       
>Jim Drew - Vice President, Utilities Unlimited, Inc.
>-----------------------------------------------------------------

>   So let's hope it's true...

>	Marc
Um...Mr. Drew. How can you be done with Emplant? I thought you were going to
make a bunch of other computer modules.

I was told to wait until the release date before flaming. It is past(I think)
the release date. I am getting restless.

-- 
Jason White                 | I am Amiga
jason@edsi.plexus.COM       | hear me roar!
                            |     /
SYSOP of Computer Continent |   \/
From: George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca (George Lin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: OS/2
Date: 21 Jul 92 09:51:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: mindlink.13603
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada

> Quentin Snow writes:
> An Operating System that takes 4+ megs just to run at a suficient speed??
> This seems a bit rediculous to me..  I dont care how "great" os/2 is, to
> take that much memory -- there is no excuse except .. IBM ..


Then I guess CBM doesn't have any excuses either.

Amiga + Unix > 4 Megs
In fact, when I used to work for Commodore, the Unix boxes we had were all 16
Megs.

OS/2 is a great OS.
It is extremely stable.  (definately much more stable than AmiDos 2.0)

The multitasking is very smooth.  Of course, the video on my 486 still seems
slower than an unaccelerated A2000, but the overall speed and compatibility
(with DOS, Windoze) is incredible.
Things that I've done for years my Amiga, such as formating one floppy and
reading from a second floppy drive, I can finally do on my PC.

One thing I really like about OS/2 (compared with AmigaDos), is that OS/2
doesn't run out of memory.  If RAM is full up, then the OS will cache unused
programs to the HD.

(BTW, I've been an Amiga fan for years KS1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.0...)

--

 -------------------------------------------
| George Lin                  | 145.270 MHz |
| George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca   |   VE7FKU    |
 -------------------------------------------
From: jamiller@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Stop the Silly Emplant to be or not to be banter was Re: First to ask a
Date: 28 Jul 92 16:49:42 CDT
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

>		<stuff deleted> 
> I was told to wait until the release date before flaming. It is past(I think)
> the release date. I am getting restless.
> 
> -- 
> Jason White                 | I am Amiga
> jason@edsi.plexus.COM       | hear me roar!
>                             |     /
> SYSOP of Computer Continent |   \/

Don't you all have anything better to do with your time?  Maybe all
you people with too much time on you hands should start doing something
constructive with your computers rather than wasting so much time on
whether Mr. Drew is or isn't a deadbeat.  Guess I better take some of
of this advice to heart myself, but sure would be good if it turns out
to be a floating boat.  -)  Regardless all are silly banter isn't
going to make it happen and quicker.  Maybe there's something we the
public consumer body can do to help expediate Emplant's release?  -);
-- 
jamiller@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
James Miller

_chicchai .sig no ho ha ichiban iin janai ka_
From: kopackm@lonex.rl.af.mil (Michael A. Kopack)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: What's up Mr. Drew
Date: 21 Jul 92 13:43:33 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: RL

I seem to recall Mr. Drew as stating a few weeks ago that he wouldn't be
posting here until the the Emplant was finished. Can we assume that the product
is done based on the amount of posting you have done recently, Jim?

Also, I'd like to know what I'll be able to do with it with my current system
setup. I have an A500 with 1Meg (512 Chip) and a 105 Meg HD. What sort of
compatablility can I expect with that setup? Will I really need to have a
much more powerful system to usae Emplant? I've considered getting Progressive
Peripheral's 040 board for the computer.

Thanks, and hope to see the Emplant soon,

--Mike Kopack

PS How will this p[roduct be distributed? IE, will I be able to check it
out at my local dealer?


-- 
Mike Kopack                         | Sex, Drugs, Rock & Roll and my Amiga,
Internet : gt6758b@prism.gatech.edu | what more could anyone want?
           kopack@bugs.rl.af.mil    \              -- Me 
           kopackm@lonex.rl.af.mil   -------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: aa395@yfn.ysu.edu (Perry Tarantine)
Subject: atonce
Organization: Youngstown State University/Youngstown Free-Net
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 13:25:48 GMT


I'm considering buying an atonce board for my 500, 
can someone who has one give me their opinions on it?
What i'm concerned about is compatibility, what doesn't work
with it/what does?
-- 
Perry Tarantine  aa395  /*/       ///     /*/ Amiga: Computer for the
SysOp of the RPG Sig   /*/       ///     /*/     Creative Mind.
Type "Go RPG" and     /*/    \\\///     /*/No. 1 complaint of comic strip chars
Join the Adventure   /*/      \XX/     /*/     "I don't have thumbs!"
From: rcmolden@parmesan.cs.wisc.edu (Robertc. Moldenhauer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: OS/2
Date: 24 Jul 92 18:27:29 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison -- Computer Sciences Dept.

In article <13695@mindlink.bc.ca> George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca (George Lin) writes:
>> mjp3783@ritvax.isc.rit.edu writes:
>> 
>> Sorry, no. I have YET to crash 2.0 except with a faulty program that I wrote.
>> OS/2, on the other hand JUST (within the last 15 seconds) crashed on my
>> room-mates machine running JustWrite? He now claims it to be a faulty printer
>> driver. Nice.
>
>You mean, you've never crashed 2.0 using a commercial program?  Well, I'm very
>surprised to hear that.  It doesn't behave quite that well for me.
>
>Actually, I've had a few problems printing from WinOS2->Os2->LPT1, but the
>machine never crashed.  Just went busy for a minute, then the OS caught it, and
>regained control.
>
>I found it much easier and faster to print WinOS2->LPT1.
>(maybe you could pass this info to your roomate)
>
>Anyways, this topic IS in the wrong group.
>
Yes, take this OS/2 sh*t to comp.sys.half.an.OS or wherever it belongs,
it DOES NOT BELONG HERE!


>--
>
> -------------------------------------------
>| George Lin                  | 145.270 MHz |
>| George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca   |   VE7FKU    |
> -------------------------------------------
From: u2112539@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
Subject: Re: AMAXII+   <==> Soft.pc/at
Date: 30 Jul 92 09:39:15 +1000
Organization: University of New South Wales

In article <1992Jul28.221603.20688@crash.cts.com>, jgallego@pnet01.cts.com (Jose Gallego) writes:
> 
> It runs without any problem.  It runs like an 286AT at 5-6Mhz CGA monochrome
> (since the AMAX+ is emulating a monochrome Mac).

	That would make it faster than PCTask that runs at 85% of an xt on my
A3000. Is that true ?

> Jose~

	George


Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
From: atul@Cadence.COM (Atul Srinivasan)
Subject: Re: Questions AMAX II with 2.5 Software
Organization: Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 14:40:48 GMT

Hello,
	For anyone who knows,

- Does 2.5 support accelerators ?

- Is there a list of accelerators it does or does not
support ?

- Is this support better or different than 2.06

- Whats the upgrade policy for software only ?

Thanks much,

Atul
atul@cadence.COM
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations