From: dchatterjee@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Report: U.S insists Pakistan prove its's not backing terrorists
Date: 11 Jan 93 14:49:42 CST
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

In article <ll3fo0INN9p@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>, tsreddy@skitime.Eng.Sun.COM 
(T.S.Reddy) writes:
> In article <1993Jan11.080708@IASTATE.EDU> maali@IASTATE.EDU (Muhammad A Ali) 
>writes:
>>In article <1993Jan10.194952.17472@oakhill.sps.mot.com>,
>>fmbutt@engage.sps.mot.com (Farooq M. Butt) writes:
>>> 
>>> This is yet another notch in the ratcheting up of anti-Pakistan/muslim
>>> pressure.  I hope it is an expected one, because I was waiting for
>>> this to happen.  Pakistan is useless to the USA and furthermore has is
>>> seen as insolent to one of the masters' new buddies: India.  Remember
>>> that geopolitically even though India is not a very important area for
>>> US foreign policy, Pakistan's location is even worse.  Moreover India
>>> has been attracting US capital any way it can (by deregulating old
>>> socialist industries and trying to setup a silicon valley in
>>> Bangalore). Thus the US finds itself holding a stake in India's
>>> stability.  There is no such US stake in Pakistan.  Indeed, the
>>> relationship has been so one-sided that Americans would not even bat
>>> an eye at slamming the door on Pakistan, meanwhile our GNP would
>>> suffer considerably.
>>> 
>>> The time has come to recognize the charade for what it is.  Today they
>>> give 180 days to prove we're not terrorists, tomorrow it will be 60 to
>>> prove we're not "fundamentalist mozzzzlems."  Indeed, it may even be
>>> better for us to take the US demand nonchalantly, shrug our shoulders
>>> and ask the state department boys to define "terrorist."  Ask them why
>>> they made us arm, supply and feed Afghan "terrorists" and why they
>>> aided us to the hilt. Ask 'em if this isn't a clear case of hypocricy ?
>>> Tell 'em we find it tiresome to deal with hypocrites and tell 'em 
>>> to shut up their spy-centers and embassies and, like, leave.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> fmb
>>
>>
>>        I think we should ask the new American Administration to prove that
>>Pakistan is supporting terrorrists as the burden of proof is on them. Moreover
>>we should try to stay away from America as a country (I don't mean we shouldn't
>>visit USA). The best course of action for Pakistan is to attract as much
>>investment from the ORIENTALS as bpossible as those guys have BIG BUCKS and are
>>not a power threat to Pakistan and if they become we'll be able to deal with it
>>hopefully. Let Indians have a Silicon Valley and lets get Tokyo.
> 
> 
>      As a erstwhile native of Bangalore (which is being called Silicon Plateau),
> I can vouch that one of the main reasons for it's immense success is that people
> from all over India can settle there and feel right at home. Right now, the rest
> of the world is also taking notice of that fact. Relatively little of the " I
> want the whole pie for my caste, my language, my religion" talk exists.
> 
>      In the same vein, a simpler solution for Pakistan is to make a genuine 
> attempt at solving problems with India on a bilateral basis and to start 
> thinking of playing a constructive role in the sub-continent. It is  
> abominable that when fratricidal enemies all over the world are making
> up, the people in the sub-continent are going for each others throats
> with a new vengeance. Until and unless Pakistan solves it's problems 
> with India, it has little chance of seeing genuine progress.

  I agree with Mr.Ali and Mr.Reddy. Mr.Ali however has made a practical
  solution. I am of the opinion that B'lore - which is *EXTREMELY* expensive
  because of the hi-tech, is a place which is a city that has all the 
  electronic talents. I must add that India did never fund terrorism. Thus,
  most of the money was well-spent (that received as aid).

  However, in both Mr.Ali and Reddy's vein, Pakistan must stop funding the
  JKLF forces in Kashmir. You see, gentlemen, the situation is quite grim with
  Pakistan. Robert Gates the CIA director had filed a report - following which
  James Baker III sent a letter to Pakistan - requesting them to stop all the
  terrorism in Kashmir. If Pakistan has to survive to see a better tomorrow,
  then she must resort to logical ways of spending money in industries and 
  in R&D. The getting of the "cherished Islamic N-Bomb" and instigating all
  the hostilities is what is giving Pakistan a bad name. This has probably
  nothing to do with religion, but, unfortunately power-hungry politicians
  will grab anything to save their seats.

        - khuda hafez,

         deb chatterjee
       (a good samaritan)