HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way)
Subject: Re: Clinton, draft dodger. YUP!
Organization: New Mexico State University, MetaPhysical Science Laboratory
	<1992Sep1.012932.18468@seq.uncwil.edu>
	<1992Sep1.120949.7529@afit.af.mil> <1992Sep1.180900.24779@novell.com>
	<1992Sep3.133427.18690@tamsun.tamu.edu>
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 14:48:47 GMT

In article <1992Sep3.133427.18690@tamsun.tamu.edu> fred@johnd.tamu.edu (Fred Seals 5-2298) writes:
	[ ... some arguments that Rush hisself would be proud of ... ]

   ##############################################################################

   He did inhale.  He lied about the draft.  He did sleep with Flowers. 
   He did cheat on his wife.  He will raise taxes.  He will put people out of
   work.  He is LIBERAL.

   You can not be one kind of man and another kind of President.

   Bush/Quale 92
        ~~~~~
   Fred Seals

   ##############################################################################

Gawrsh, Fred, who's this "Quale" feller?!

	(..)
         ~~
L.
"Yeh, Buddy..            | larry@psl.nmsu.edu (Larry Cunningham)|  _~~_
 I've got your COMPUTER! | % Physical Science Laboratory        | (O)(-)
 Right HERE!!"           | New Mexico State University          |  /..\ 
 (computer THIS!)        | Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 88003    |   <> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are CORRECT, mine, and not PSLs or NMSUs..
O Fair New Mexico! Landfill of Enchantment. And home of THEM (Atomic Ants)..



Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: thyat@sdf.lonestar.org (Tom Hyatt)
Subject: Re: Buchanan's speech at convention
Keywords: Buchanan Rush Limbaugh
Organization: sdf Public Access UNIX, Dallas--unrestricted free shell access
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 05:52:29 GMT

In article <1992Aug20.014432.19682@wdl.loral.com> eric@wdl35.wdl.loral.com (Eric Kuhnen) writes:
>rja@redwood26.cray.com (Russ Anderson) writes:
>>(Speech delivered by Patrick Buchanan at the Republican convention
>>in Houston on Monday, August 17, 1992.)
>>> Mr. Clinton, however, has a different agenda.  
>>> At its top is unrestricted abortion on demand.
>>Which, of course, is a lie.  (Not that it is suprising 
>>that Buchanan would resort to lying.)
>
>And just what do you think is the outcome of a liberal, "pro-choice" endorse-
>ment from a would-be President Clinton?  You have your head in the sand if
>you think that Buchannan hasn't pegged this one perfectly!
>
>Eric

Sorry to inform you Eric, but Clinton does support certain restrictions on
abortions.  No third trimester abortions (unless mother is in danger) and
no women under 18 years without parental permission or court order if there
is a good reason for her being unable to get parental permission.  These
restrictions were signed into law by Clinton.  Buchanan agrees with (and helped
write) the plank in the Republican platform that made *all* abortions illegal,
under all situations.  I know, your mind is made up. I'll quit trying to
confuse you with facts......


>-- 
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Comments and criticism are welcome.  Flames to /dev/null.  "Get a life"
>drivel to /dev/mirror.


Tom H.



-- 
==========================================================================       Tom Hyatt                          | My disclaimer:  I am not affiliated        USENET: thyat@sdf.lonestar.org     | with any USENET sites, organizations       RIME:  -->LUNATIC (Tom Hyatt)      | or personnel. The views given by me        Prodigy: KKDH77A (quit yer laffin!)| are mine, and nobody else's.  Nyah!       ==========================================================================
-
---
From: v125p7c5@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Michael Lamanna)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: 42
Date: 1 Sep 92 14:06:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


	I really hate to bring this up again.  Every one else has so I 
thought that I would do the same as well.  The subject line explains the 
topic so hit n if you don't want to read it.  

	Does anyone out there think that perhaps Douglas Adam's picked
the number for no other reason than it just came to him in the spur of 
the moment (no maybe you wouldn't).  The fact that he decided to make it 
'what do you get when you multiply 6 times 9' may have some relevance, 
since he maybe wanted to make the point that there is something terribly 
wrong with the earth.  
	The whole trilogy is full of things that point out the fact that 
there is something wrong with the earth.  This could just be another 
example.  


						Michael Lamanna
					     University At Buffalo
					       Civil Engineering

	"It is easier to get forgiven than permission."
        98.6% of all statistics are made up
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: pedmonds@cs.toronto.edu ("Philip G. Edmonds")
Subject: Re: new abbreviations
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Distribution: alt
Date: 2 Sep 92 15:25:45 GMT

Oh boy, another topic to get everyone going.....

In article <BPOSTOW.92Sep2104104@occs.cs.oberlin.edu> bpostow@occs.cs.oberlin.edu (Brian Postow) writes:
>I have gotten a little annoyed with the abbreviations used here, one
>because they are long, and two because they are difficult to say.
>
>here are my propostions
>
>HHGttG is fine as it is

I always used the simple HGG to refer to the series.
For the rest of the books (including Dirk Gently) I've never had the 
patience to figure out the myriad of acronyms that people come up with.
[I'm sure it takes as long to type one in as it would to type the
full name itself :=) ]

Phil.
From: jim@n5ial.chi.il.us (Jim Graham)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: Adams' books
Date: 3 Sep 92 23:51:20 GMT
Organization: Me? Organized? Hah! :-)

In article <1992Sep1.154749.6473@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
umehn@ccu.umanitoba.ca writes:

> A Book Store's Humor Section:
>    The Meaning of Liff

went to the bookstore today to get this, and they told me it was
out of print.  anyone out there know where I might find a copy?
perhaps a bookstore that still has the book?

thanks....
   --jim

--
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNET:  jim@n5ial.chi.il.us  |  grahj@gagme.chi.il.us  |  j.graham@ieee.org
ICBM:  41.70N 87.63W                    UUCP:  gagme!n5ial!jim@clout.chi.il.us
AMATEUR RADIO: n5ial@n9hsi (Chicago.IL.US.Earth)              73 DE N5IAL (/9)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: bjornts@ii.uib.no (Bjoern Tore Sund)
Subject: Re: 42
Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Bergen
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 16:31:04 GMT

In article <BtwKJ5.A5J@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v125p7c5@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Michael Lamanna) writes:
|> 	Does anyone out there think that perhaps Douglas Adam's picked
|> the number for no other reason than it just came to him in the spur of 
|> the moment (no maybe you wouldn't).  The fact that he decided to make it 
|> 'what do you get when you multiply 6 times 9' may have some relevance, 
|> since he maybe wanted to make the point that there is something terribly 
|> wrong with the earth.  
|> 	The whole trilogy is full of things that point out the fact that 
|> there is something wrong with the earth.  This could just be another 
|> example.  

The thought has occured to me, and probably to everyone else, but why bring
up suich unrelevant matters in the middle of an interresting debate?

Seriously though, probability has it that you're right. This is especially
underlined by Arthur's comment in the TV series when 6*9 ha just turned up;
"Oh. I always knew there was something fundamentally wrong with the 
Universe." And 42 was either just something that came to DA in the spur of
the moment, or he could have picked it up from for instance "Alice in
Wonderland", where rule 42 states that "all persons more than a mile high
mus leave the courtroom immediately." There are all kinds of possibilities.
But, so what? The 42 debate is still quite interresting, and if anyone is
NOT interrested, skip it!

Bjoern Tore Sund
Department of Informatics
University of Bergen, Norway
bjornts@ii.uib.no

Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: paf4@po.CWRU.Edu (Peter A. Fortman)
Subject: Re: 6*9=42(13)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 19:58:14 GMT


Hey, here's an idea... He said 6 * 9 = 42 just to incorporate not only 42
but to bring up the whole issue of simultaneous oral sex! 69!
Maybe Arthur does fuck!
Maybe this IS the answer to our problems! 69!

;)

D.G. tms
-- 
-Pete Fortman
"Non Ego Vecors Sum Sed Dumtaxat Male Sanus"
        ^      ^       |     ^       ^
From: "davidr turner" <davidr.turner@canrem.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: hhgttg on ytv
Date: 23 Aug 92 18:03:24 EST
Reply-To: "davidr turner" <davidr.turner@canrem.com>
Distribution: alt
Organization: Canada Remote Systems

SR>I was watching YTV recently (sci-fi, what else?) and I noticed an add about
SR>'British Sci-Fi' coming in September.  I don't know if anyone else saw this
SR>add but there are clips from the HHGTTG tv series throughout...YEAH!

SR>This will mean that I will be able to re-tape my copy which is getting rathe
SR>worn (does anyone else have HHGTTG as a copy from a copy? - don't look at me
SR>other people have taped mine too :-) ).

Thanks for the info !  Too bad it's YTV... we'll only see 90% (80? 70?)
of the actual show - I've stopped taping Red Dwarf Saturdays, and am
leaving my old, scratchy episodes from PBS (commercial-free) in my video
cabinet.

However, since I have only episodes 2,3 & 5 from the LAST time YTV
showed HHGTTG (with the same advertising blitzes), I shall take it
with a grain of salt to tape all the episodes this time.

Later...

 * SLMR 2.1a * We all live in a yellow subroutine.
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario/Detroit, MI
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: pedmonds@cs.toronto.edu ("Philip G. Edmonds")
Subject: Re: 6*9=42(13)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Date: 26 Aug 92 16:15:27 GMT

In article <17fl0qINNpnu@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> keeper@deeptht.armory.com writes:
>
>   The fact that 6 x 9 = 42 base 13 means nothing with regard to
>   this series, because the Answer is written and spoken `forty-two'.

You can't speak in letters or digits.  The great computer Deep Thought
SAID `42' or `forty-two' which you can interpret any way you like.  Ford
and Arthur might have seen FORTY TWO written on the scrabble board but
that's only because there are no digits in a scrabble set (the medium
available was used).

Besides, it's the meaning that counts not the way you write or speak it.

>
>    42 base 13 is >not< `forty-two'.

Is `six' times `nine' = `forty-two' (base `thirteen')?
Of course it is.

Futilely,
Phil.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: chrisc@debra.dgbt.doc.ca (Chris Camfield)
Subject: Re: Young Zaphod
Organization: Communications Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 17:19:15 GMT

In article <Bto0GI.MHz@acsu.buffalo.edu> v120qldp@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (PATRICK FERREL) writes:
>In article <1992Aug27.140638.25102@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, Virginia.A.Reed@dartmouth.edu (Virginia A. Reed) writes...
>>>Actually, if I'm not wrong, there are only six:  Zaphod, Zaphod's
>>>great-grandfather, Yooden Vranx, Zarniwoop, Roosta and someone whom I can't
>>>remember.
>> 
>>I belive that the seventh is Slartibartfast.
>
>How is Slartibartfast supposed to know?  He slept for five million years.  He
>probably wouldn't have a clue if you talked about Improbability Physics.
>
>

Am I missing something on this subject by not having read "Young
Zaphod" yet?  From _Restaurant_ (Chapter 29):

If someone hasn't read _Restaurant_ (yeah right), quotes ahead....











"On an small obscure world somewhere in the middle of nowhere in
particular...it is protected by a vast field of improbability to which
only six men in this galaxy have a key"

Looks like 6 people, not 7.

However, when the man is talking to his cat:

"When the men come, or when in my mind the men come in their six black
shiny ships, do they come in your mind too?"

I never got the impression that we knew the identities of any of the 6
people.  Besides which, Zaphod's granddad and Yooden Vranx are dead.

Comments?
-- 
"Would you mind it if I had it all?  I'll take it when it comes" (CH)
  __  __     __      __
 /   /_/ /  /_/ /\  /_/ /|/  aka Chris Camfield (chrisc@debra.dgbt.doc.ca)
/_/ / / /_ / / /_/ / / / /   Play Akropolis! Telnet to 143.229.1.27 6666
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: domalley@unix1.tcd.ie (Slartibartfast            (alias Daniel O'Malley))
Subject: Re: 6*9=42(13)
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 11:19:15 GMT

In <1992Aug30.213539.12431@newstand.syr.edu> jdeddy@rodan.acs.syr.edu (The Really Confused One) writes:

>In article <715060051snx@klaatu.demon.co.uk> Steve@klaatu.demon.co.uk (Steve Loft) writes:
>>I don't suppose anyone really wanted to hear this, but it's not actually
>>possible to make the sentence 'what do you get if you multiply six by
>>nine' from a standard scrabble set.  But then maybe Arthur's 'home made'
>>set wasn't standard....

>	I hate to sound stupid, but what letter is the offending one?
>	I mean, i just checked and the only letters which i would think
>	would cause a prob would be I and Y, but i'd like to think that
>	there are at least 4 I's and Y's in a scrabble set...
 
'Fraid not. There are only 2 Y's in a standard scrabble set.

Maybe it was:

What do U get if U multiply six by nine?

That would work, would it not?

(But of course Arthur's set was not a conventional one, so we can
explain away this small anomaly. Thank goodness.)

Daniel.
--
+-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+  |-----Daniel O'Malley-----|----"Look - I didn't mount an invasion just to----|  |-------------------------|-------whisk some flippin' eggs!", protested------|
|        //               |----the Supreme Dalek from the TARDIS kitchen.----|  |   ====//  ====    ====  |--------------------------------------------------|
| //   // //   // //   // |---"In the beginning, the universe was created.---|  |  ===//   ===// //   //  |-This has made a lot of people angry and has been-|
|-------------------------|---------widely regarded as a bad move."----------|  |--domalley@unix1.tcd.ie--|----The Restaurant at the End Of The Universe-----|  +-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+
From: rsholmes@rodan.syr.EDU (Rich Holmes)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: Re: 6*9=42(13)
Date: 1 Sep 92 18:29:51 GMT
	<17fl0qINNpnu@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>
	<1992Aug30.171140.29445@athena.cs.uga.edu>
	<1992Aug30.181004.642@ctr.columbia.edu>
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
In-reply-to: daniel@csgi62.dcs.leeds.ac.uk's message of Sun, 30 Aug 1992 18:10:04 GMT

In article <1992Aug30.181004.642@ctr.columbia.edu> daniel@csgi62.dcs.leeds.ac.uk (D N Crow) writes:

>In article <1992Aug30.171140.29445@athena.cs.uga.edu>, shimkus@athena.cs.uga.edu (Peter Gambit) writes:
>> 
>> Sorry, this is slightly off-subject, but I cant resist.  I came in this morning and logged on to my acct to read my news.  As i scaned down the list of groups
>> I was amused to notice that there were 42 unread messages in alt.fan.douglas-adams!
>> 
>> Peter Gambit
>
>I don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but it is exactly 42 minutes
>since anyone posted about this. Spooky, huh?
>
>Slightly off-subject, you may not know this, but 6*9 really is 42, if you
>use base 13!!! Spooky, huh?
>
>Also, I've heard that Douglas Adams (he's an author, you know), is writing
>another book. Its in his Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy series. You may
>have heard of it. I think it is going to be the 42nd. book in the series.
>Perhaps we could have a discussion about this? Did you know that this is the
>only trilogy with 42 books in it? And that books 5-41 were never actually
>written? Spooky, huh?
>
>-- 
>Dan Crow
>daniel@scs.leeds.ac.uk

I'll bet all sorts of clueless newbie freshmen are going to follow up
on the above post.

Whoops.

--
Inspected by number 23
From: esa@acpub.duke.edu (EMILY ANGERER)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: Re: 6 times 9
Date: 27 Aug 92 20:56:16 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

David_Woodsworth@mindlink.bc.ca (David Woodsworth) writes:
>> EMILY ANGERER writes:
>> novels, "Life, the Universe, and Everything" suggests that the Golgafrinchans
>> were not necessarily Arthur's ancestors.  The conversation is:
>> 
>> "'What happened to the Golgafrinchans?' asked Ford.
>> "Arthur shrugged.
>> "'A lot of them didn't make it through the winter three years ago,' he
>> said, 'and the few who remained in the spring said they needed a holiday
>> and set off on raft.  History says that they must have survived....'"

>"History says that they must have survived..."
>
>I take that as being a reference to Noahs Ark ... which, without bringing any
>theological arguments into this, is said to be the basis for mankind today.
>So, the cavemen DID die, and were replaced by the Golgafrinchans on their raft.

I don't wish to start a completely futile argument or to seem rather
obtuse, but how on earth do you get Noah's Ark from that line?  Noah's
Ark was a flood.  Scientists recognize it as confined to the Fertile
Crescent in the middle East, in which case the Golgafrinchans weren't
involved at all.  The Bible suggests it was global, in which case no one
would have survived, including Arthur and Ford.  And I won't get into
the fact that it was rougly 1,996,000 years too soon for Noah's Ark.

The point is, the Golgafrinchans set off on a raft with a better than
even chance of dying on the way, while the cavepeople remained firmly on
land, so far as we know, since they don't seem to have evolved to the
point of being able to build a raft yet.  And as I said before, Earth
didn't seem ready to give up on the cavepeople yet, as is evidenced by
the Scrabble game.

BTW, wouldn't Benji Mouse and Frankie Mouse have been aware of it
if somewhere along the line their program had been that badly disrupted?

I guess that puts me up to $0.04...

-Emily
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: mcodogno@nyx.cs.du.edu (Maurizio Codogno)
Subject: 6*9=42(13)
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 07:00:24 GMT


sorry if I seem iconoclastic, but we all know the mathematical
aptitudes of DNA (in a suitable interval around 0). It's more probable
a holistic interpretation of the thing, rather thansomething 
intentionally put into the plot.
ciao! .mau.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: tjz20735@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Tom Zych)
Subject: Re: Tea.
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 15:13:07 GMT

garden@hpltoad.hpl.hp.com writes:


>	Erm.....Does anyone out there know how to make tea ?

You mean you want to drink dead leaves boiled in water?
From: abw@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Andy Wardley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: MOSTLY HARMLESS - FYI
Date: 27 Aug 92 10:20:42 GMT
Organization: International Computers Limited


Would you believe it?  I just happened to mention to my girlfriend last night
that DA is one of my fave authors.  She only goes and tells me that she's
got the manuscript for Mostly Harmless sitting on her desk at work.  (she
works for a publisher, needless to say).  

"Gummpphhhh" said I.  

"Hmm" said she, "do you want to read it?".  

"Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes...."  (three hours later she promised she would 
let me read it if I stopped shouting "YES" at the top of my voice.)

So feel free to be insanely jealous while I sit here smugly planning where
to take my girlfriend out for dinner.  :-)

It's due out in the UK in mid October, the rest of the world I'm not sure
of, but you can expect me to keep you informed.....

Cheers
Andy

-- 

___________________________________________________________________________
 , '   Standard disclaimer available on request                Andy Wardley
-o O-                                                   abw@oasis.icl.co.uk
  l                                                     
From: rik@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Richard Beckett)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 16:28:03 GMT
Subject: Re: 6*9=42(13)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Labs, Bristol, UK
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Reply-To: rik@hplb.hpl.hp.com


In article <17fl0qINNpnu@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>, hermit@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Ron
O'Dell) writes:
|> 
|> 
|> 
|> Gordon Bennett, here we go again.
|> 
|>    The fact that 6 x 9 = 42 base 13 means nothing with regard to
|>    this series, because the Answer is written and spoken `forty-two'.
|> 
|>     42 base 13 is >not< `forty-two'.
|> 
|> Bloody hell!
|> 
|> 
|> Sorry ...
|> 
|> -- 
|> --- keeper@deeptht.armory.com (Ron O'Dell)   Do >not< mail hermit!
|> 					     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~





				YEAH !


	Cheers,


		RIK


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rik O'Chet, Bristol, England.		
Email: rik@hplb.hpl.hp.com		One's never alone with a Rubber Duck !
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: v120qldp@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (PATRICK FERREL)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
Subject: Re: Young Zaphod
Date: 26 Aug 92 01:00:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Aug24.103359.19157@mr.med.ge.com>, hinz@picard.med.ge.com (David Hinz Mfg 4-6987) writes...
>Hymie! (hymowitz@whatever.cs.jhu.edu) wrote:
>: hey look... some of us know how to delete lines in our favorite editor!

Yeah, no kidding.  I'm connected through a modem, and it takes a while to
delete old stuff at 2400 baud, but I do it anyway!

>Who are the seven people, referred to in the first book I believe, who actually
>know what's going on in the world?  I could only identify six, but can't
>recall who all they were offhand.

Actually, if I'm not wrong, there are only six:  Zaphod, Zaphod's
great-grandfather, Yooden Vranx, Zarniwoop, Roosta and someone whom I can't
remember.


Patrick A. Ferrel - Scholar. Helpless romantic. Modem geek.  | Disaster Area
v120qldp@ubvms.buffalo.edu  | WWIVnet 1@7659 | IceNET 1@7659 | (716)683-6657
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: bjornts@ii.uib.no (Bjoern Tore Sund)
Subject: Re: 6*9=42(13)
Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Bergen
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 92 14:40:15 GMT

In article 1434, Re: 6*9=42(13), "Daniel" writes:
>'Fraid not. There are only 2 Y's in a standard scrabble set.

>Maybe it was:

>What do U get if U multiply six by nine?

It wasn't. At least, in the TV series, it wasn't. It was laid
out in very plain, good english.

>(But of course Arthur's set was not a conventional one, so we can
>explain away this small anomaly. Thank goodness.)

The pieces in the game were photoed up close, and they did look very
home-made. There's also the fact that when Arthur had finished the
sentence, there were no more pieces in the bag. I would assume that
in a conventional Scrabble-game, there would be a few pieces left 
after such a (relatively) short sentence?

Bjoern Tore Sund
Department of Informatics
University of Bergen, Norway
bjornts@ii.uib.no
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams
From: owigger@dxcern.cern.ch (Othmar Wigger)
Subject: BBC World Service Broadcast
Organization: CERN European Laboratory for Particle Physics
Distribution: eunet
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 20:14:58 GMT

Hello Fans

   Just by accident I noticed the other day that BBC World Service
is broadcasting the "Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" in several parts.
I wonder if somebody could give me the exact schedules. Thank you

                        Othmar 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.douglas-adams