HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: chris@quay.ie (Christopher Davey)
Subject: PCSAOS2 on Ethernet with NetBios on Tokenring
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 14:52:44 GMT
Organization: Quay Financial Software

The subject says it all - I am trying to configure a machine
with 2 protocol stacks, one of which is to run LAT/Decnet on
top of an ethernet, and the other is to run NetBios on top of
a token ring. Has anybody done this ? Is is possible ?

We achieved this amazing feat with Pathworks V1.1 but we have
now got Pathworks V2.0, and despite struggling with this for
a couple of weeks have gotten nowhere.  Dec are no help
at all, unfortunatly - well here in Ireland anyway.

At present we are using OS2 1.32 ( have tried V2.0 but that
doesn't work at all - for me ).  We can either make LAT work,
of get netbios to work, but not both at the same time.  If anybody
has done this, please could you send me you protocol.ini ibmcom.ini (or
lanman.ini) and config.sys.   If anybody would like a copy of any of my 
config files, just send me an email!

A summary will be posted, if there are any useful replies.
Any help at all will be very gratefully received, indeed.

Thanks again,
Chris

-- 
----WNA----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Davey                       Internet:  chris@quay.ie
Quay Financial Software           Phone   :  +353 1 612377  Fax: +353 1 607592
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: mwaldorf@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Matthias Waldorf)
Subject: Re: setclock/tar for TCP/IP 1.2.1 ?
Organization: Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 13:27:21 GMT

>> 
>> The reason we switched from PC/TCP to TCP/IP was mainly IBM's X Server.
>> 

>Hmmmm.....if I gave you just 1 little DLL that allowed you to run IBM's X
>over our PCTCP ?????

>Larry

Might have been a good idea ... but now we already paid IBM for TCP/IP 1.2.1.
Matthias.
From: keating@casemo.UUCP (John Keating )
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Etherlink II
Date: 19 Aug 92 15:43:50 GMT
Organization: Dowty Communications, Inc.

We're having troubles installing an 3Com Etherlink II board under PC/TCP.
PC/TCP seems to be working fine, however, nothing goes out to the network
or comes back in.  I believe the problem is due to the card defaulting
the tranceiver to the internal tranceiver, but as we're using thick cable,
it needs to be set to external.  We're using the 3com_mac.zoo NDIS drivers
from hobbes, if that helps any.  How do I set the tranceiver to external?

Thanks  much!

John Keating, III

-- 
    John Wllm Keating, III      | mimsy.cs.umd.edu!casemo!keating
  Dowty Communications, Inc.    | 73737.733@compuserve.com
 formerly  CASE/Datatel, Inc.   | The above message may not correspond with the
                                | views of Dowty Communications, Inc. -JWK3-
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: schafer@is.rice.edu (Richard Alan Schafer)
Subject: Re: Installing LaMail's EPM eats ressources
Organization: Rice University
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 21:44:40 GMT

In article <1992Aug11.183349.30075@watson.ibm.com>, margoli@watson.ibm.com
(Larry Margolis) writes:
|> In  <92220.121341RONY@awiwuw11.wu-wien.ac.at>  FLATSCHER Rony
|> <RONY@awiwuw11.wu-wien.ac.at> writes:
|> > The solution: If LaMail is being installed on version 2.0, either install
|> > just the LaMail-E-programs and use the installed EPM
|> 
|> No can do - the latest LaMail requires features of the 5.51 toolkit
|> (ETK?551.DLL) that are not present in the 5.50 version.
|> 
|> > or replace the 2.0-EPM with the newer version being on the TCP/IP disks.
|> 
|> The OS/2 2.0 Enhanced Editor was configured with different defaults than
|> the EPM that comes with OS/2 TCP/IP, so it's not clear that this is
|> desirable.

Larry, is there some hope that this situation will be fixed in the future so
that multiple copies of the EPM toolkit won't be required?  

-- 
Richard
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: remote postscript printing problem
Keywords: postscript OS/2 TCP/IP
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 23:54:47 GMT

In article <2039@deadmin.ucsd.edu> lu@topcad.ucsd.edu (George Lu) writes:
>I installed TCP/IP 1.2.1 on our 386 running OS/2.  I setup lprmon to
>monitor lpt1 and send the print job to a postscript printer on an
>Appletalk (or is tat LocalTalk ?) network via aonther Sun workstation.
>I printed a MS Word document, only to get a few pages of postcript
>code from that printer.  The source of the problem are the control-D
>at the beginning of the postcript file.
>One workaround is to print to a file, edit out the control-D, then lpr
>from an OS/2 command window, but that does not seem like an elegant
>solution.  Is there a way to strip those control-D's?

We had a similar problem.  The solution we chose was to modify things
on the Sun so that it would interpret such files as Postscript and
print them appropriately.

There are several ways to do that, the easiest being to write some
sort of filter to remove a leading CTRL-D, then pipe that output to
the print queue.  (The filter would run on the Sun and accept printer
output from the OS/2 station.)

-- 
Get the OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST | Timothy F. Sipples
from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp,     | Internet: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu
directory pub/os2/all/faq, or from      | Dept. of Econ., U. Chicago, 60637
LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP"). | Tsongas > Perot > Clinton.  Yay.
From: ghenniga@NMSU.Edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: Telnet
Date: 17 Aug 92 21:30:59 GMT
Reply-To: ghenniga@NMSU.Edu
Organization: New Mexico State University - Electromagnetics Group

>If I have understood some mail correctly, IBM TCP/IP for OS/2 (and FTP
>softwares TCP/IP too) include a Telnet daemon?  But when once logged into
>a Telnet session there isn't that much to do, because all programs you
>execute must be writing/reading to/from stdin/stdout?  Is this correct?

This is almost correct. You can run ANY OS/2 app, but if it's a PM (or
WPS) program you won't be able to see the application so it's use running
such programs is limited. You can only work with text mode programs. As for
being useful, depends on what you want to do. I use it to check on my email
periodically and using the GNU emacs port I can edit files which I can then
transfer, via modem, to my PC at home, etc.

Gary Hennigan
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=++=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
+= PhD Student, Computational Electromagnetics  | Member: Utilitarian  +=
+= New Mexico State University                  | .signature club      +=
+= Phone: (505)646-4808                          ----------------------+=
+= email: ghenniga@NMSU.Edu                                            +=
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: kwhelan@neptune.uark.edu (Kenneth Whelan)
Subject: Re: SMC drivers for NW Requestor?
Organization: University of Arkansas School of Law
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 15:02:11 GMT

In article <92225.080329U37127@uicvm.uic.edu> Satish Movva <U37127@uicvm.uic.edu> writes:

>In article <1992Aug11.220818.2468@actrix.gen.nz>, conrad@actrix.gen.nz (Conrad
>Bullock) says:
>>
>>In article <Bstnu0.Mnw@news.cso.uiuc.edu> freeman@eagle (Jay Freeman) writes:
>>> Do they exist yet?
>>
>>The Netware Requester uses ODI drivers. OS/2 ODI drivers ship with the
>>SMC cards. My Elite 16T had the driver in the OS2_ODI dir on the
>>floppy.  It's dated October '91, so it's been around a while, but the
>>revision history dates it well before that.
>>
>>I've used it with the NW Requester, under both 1.3 and 2.0

>SMC tech Support (1-800-NET-LEAD) says that they have a beta available on
>their BBS.  I dont recall the number of the BBS, but the file name was
>NOVB200.EXE.

>Satish Movva
>Univ. Of Illinois at Chicago

The number is 714-707-2481 and the drivers do have a small bug in them.  
Mail me for Details
From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: EPM
Date: 18 Aug 92 23:31:07 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
Organization: The Village Waterbed
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM

In  <1992Aug17.144325.4346@nrcnet0.nrc.ca>  chan@holo.iitsg.nrc.ca (Les Chan) writes:
>
> In article <1992Aug14.184322.31551@watson.ibm.com>, Larry Margolis <margoli@wats
>
> |>Multiple copies are not required; as I mentioned, you can delete the (5.50)
> |>EPM.EXE and *.ex in \os2\apps, and ETK*550.DLL in \os2\apps\dll, and only
> |>use the 5.51 version.
>
>
> Do you really mean to delete \os2\app\*.ex or \os2\apps\epm*.ex?

I really mean \os2\apps\*.ex

> What are these .ex files and what do they do?

EPM.EX    - The main .ex file (compiled macro code, interpreted at run time)
EXTRA.EX  - Additional stuff that wouldn't fit into the (64k max) EPM.EX
E3EMUL.EX - File load and save routines, including host support*
BOX.EX    - The BOX** command is external
DRAW.EX   - The DRAW** command is external
GET.EX    - The GET** command is external
HELP.EX   - A stand-alone .ex file used by the "Quick Reference" browser.
PUT.EX    - The PUT** command is external
EPMLEX.EX - Spelling support, for users that have LEXAM.DLL from OS/2 TCP/IP
            or some other product that includes it.

*  I hope everyone knows that you can edit VM and MVS host files with
   EPM and Communications Manager - just enter in the initial Open or
   Add File dialog HA:PROFILE EXEC A or HB:'project.group.type(member)'

** See the online documentation for details on this command.

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
From: esmith@hobbes.psych.purdue.edu (Eliot R. Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: trouble installing tcp/ip 1.2.1
Summary: C000005 error after install/configure
Date: 14 Aug 92 15:51:44 GMT
Organization: Purdue University

[I sent a version of this message yesterday, with no replies yet.  Now
I have more details about the problem.]
I recently wanted to add TCP/IP version 1.2.1 to my OS/2 2.0 system
(Gateway 2000 486DX2/50, 8 MB, SMC = WD Ethercard Plus Elite 16 network
card).  The installation and configuration seemed to go smoothly, but
on rebooting I got a series of messages from the device drivers loaded
in CONFIG.SYS and then a blank screen and c000005 in the upper left corner.
I know the machine, OS/2, and card work OK because I have been running
PC-NFS in a VDM to access the network.  

After REMming out all the added DEVICE= and RUN= lines in CONFIG.SYS 
and then reactivating them one at a time, I localized the problem to 
the very first one: 
DEVICE=C:\IBMCOM\PROTMAN.OS2 /I:C:\IBMCOM
When this line is active I get the c000005.  Has anybody seen anything
like this?  What should I check for?  I've poked around but find 
nothing obviously wrong, e.g., in the entries in the PROTOCOL.INI file.

Thanks in advance -- Eliot Smith
--
Eliot R. Smith         Dept. of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University
Phone: (317) 494-7709  West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1364   USA
Domain: esmith@psych.purdue.edu    BITNET: esmith@PURCCVM
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: nerwick@spc9.jpl.nasa.gov (Randy Nerwick)
Subject: Porting a custom protocol to OS/2
Keywords: Help!
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 08:10:47 GMT

I need to port a custom communications protocol to OS/2, and have been
having a bit of trouble digging up information on available software
and interfaces.  It will be running over ethernet at the link level
(directly specifying the ethernet destination address, type code,
and data).  We would like to be able to run this protocol alongside
an IP stack, but can live without IP if we have to.

I've been working with IP networks for several years, but am new
to PC networking.  From what I've been able to find out so far,
it looks like I need to interface with an NDIS driver.  I've got
the NDIS spec on order.  I would prefer to use a supported software
package, such as IBM's TCP/IP 1.2.1 or something from FTP Software,
to gain access to the NDIS driver through a socket- or streams-like
interface, but have been unable to determine if these packages do
what I need to do.  Several calls to sales offices have been less
than enlightening.

Is anyone aware of software with these capabilities, from the above
vendors or anyone else?

I also need to select LAN cards to use for this port.  Speed isn't
particularly critical, but reliability is, preferably with low CPU
overhead.  We will be using an ISA bus machine, probably with thick
ethernet (thin might be an option).  I would appreciate any
recommendations, or information on cards to avoid.

Thanks in advance.

Randy Nerwick			Telos/Jet Propulsion Lab
nerwick@spc9.jpl.nasa.gov	(818) 351-2341 (Work)
nerwick@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov
From: d9mikael@dtek.chalmers.se (Mikael Wahlgren)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: Telnet
Date: 18 Aug 92 22:56:15 GMT
Organization: Chalmers University of Technology

In article <1992Aug18.171035.18256@ans.net> db3l@ans.net (David Bolen) writes:

>Yes - the IBM Telnet server works by establishing itself as a VIO monitor (an
>OS/2 capability) for the full-screen session.  That means that it gets to
>intercept all calls made to the session at the VIO level and translate them
>into terminal sequences.

One reader kindly allowed me to telnet into his OS/2 machine (hope I
didn't crash it, although it certainly looked like it).  I don't know
if the communications link I got was terribly slow (it is a long way to
travel), but everything was just terrible slow, which maybe was as well,
as this allowed me to see in detail how the telnet daemon worked.

I think I was connected in about 10 minutes, and it didn't even finish
the initial DIR command I issued.  But by looking at the DIR command
executing, the whole screen was updated every time, even if it only
scrolled one row.  It seems that they have some optimizing to do.

OK, so the impression I have got from the answers are that the telnet
daemon really can execute any (almost) text session.  So let me change
the question.  Would there be any interest in a solution that allows you
to execute any (almost) text _DOS_ application from the telnet daemon?

Mikael Wahlgren
From: slin@cisco.com (Steven Lin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: What's needed for X Windows over dial-up line?
Date: 12 Aug 92 16:34:57 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: cisco Systems, Menlo Park, California, USA
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message are those of an
	      individual at SRI International, and do not necessarily
	      reflect those of the company.

Can somebody give me the exact product names and part numbers that I
would need in order to run X Windows over a dial-up line?

Also, if you have done this, can you comment on the performance of
such a setup?  How good is performance on a 486/33 with 16mb?  Is X
Windows usable at 640x480 resolution?

Pointers to a FAQ or email with answers to these questions are much
appreciated.

Steve
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Installing LaMail's EPM eats ressources
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 18:43:22 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In  <Bsw4EJ.4yK@rice.edu>  schafer@is.rice.edu (Richard Alan Schafer) writes:
>
> Larry, is there some hope that this situation will be fixed in the future so
> that multiple copies of the EPM toolkit won't be required?

Multiple copies are not required; as I mentioned, you can delete the (5.50)
EPM.EXE and *.ex in \os2\apps, and ETK*550.DLL in \os2\apps\dll, and only
use the 5.51 version.

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: dwf3356@ultb.isc.rit.edu (D.W. Filiatrault)
Subject: OS/2 TCP/IP Slip Configuation problems
Originator: dwf3356@ultb
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 05:58:49 GMT

Im trying to set up TCP/IP 1.20.1 for a slip only connection and am
have some problems.

1.  First when booting, after the inet.sys line, I get protocol manager
not installed.  The bookreader docs said it wasn't neccessary for slip
only connections-is this true?  What should my config.sys look like.

REM TCP/IP
RUN=F:\TCPIP\BIN\CNTRL.EXE
DEVICE=F:\TCPIP\BIN\INET.SYS
DEVICE=F:\TCPIP\BIN\IFNDIS.SYS
SET ETC=F:\TCPIP\ETC
SET HOSTNAME=Independance
SET SLIP.COM=COM2
 
2.  slipcall can't find a sioread socket.  I assume this is related to #1.

3.  Can slipcall be made to output some text before looking for the other
side of the slip connection?  I need to type some commands to a terminal
server.

If anyone has successfully set up a slip connection and can send me
a sample of their config.sys and *.cmd files, I would be very grateful.

Is anyone at IBM working on the PPP?

-Fireball
-- 
David "Fireball" Filiatrault        
Computer Science House @ Rochester Institute of Technology
Internet: fireball@ritcsh.csh.rit.edu or dwf3356@ultb.isc.rit.edu
From: hartzman@kilroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Les Hartzman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: PMX Error!  HELP!
Keywords: PMX, X-win.
Date: 19 Aug 92 00:00:41 GMT
Followup-To: hartzman@kilroy.jpl.nasa.gov
Distribution: na
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA

I'm running TCP/IP 1.2.1 with NFS ans X-windows.  When I try to run Lotus 123
from the Sun, I get quite an interesting error, followed by a request to shut
down PMX and terminate the application.

	Error:

		PMX Routine:
		CreateGlyphPixmap
		PM Function:  GpiBitBlt
		UNK207FE

What happened?  How do I correct it, or can I???

Another X app. I try to run creates huge menus.  Basically the whole thing
runs what appears to be a large font.  Can't describe it much better than
that right now.

Help!!  Please!

Les.



-- 
Les Hartzman                hartzman@kilroy.jpl.nasa.gov
Jet Propulsion Laboratory   M/S 238-528    (818) 354-5964
4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena,  CA.  91109
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: db3l@ans.net (David Bolen)
Subject: Re: Telnet
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 00:14:40 GMT
	<1992Aug18.171035.18256@ans.net> <13499@chalmers.se>
Organization: Advanced Network & Services, Inc. - Elmsford, NY

In article <13499@chalmers.se> d9mikael@dtek.chalmers.se (Mikael Wahlgren) writes:

>One reader kindly allowed me to telnet into his OS/2 machine (hope I
>didn't crash it, although it certainly looked like it).  I don't know
>if the communications link I got was terribly slow (it is a long way to
>travel), but everything was just terrible slow, which maybe was as well,
>as this allowed me to see in detail how the telnet daemon worked.
>
>I think I was connected in about 10 minutes, and it didn't even finish
>the initial DIR command I issued.  But by looking at the DIR command
>executing, the whole screen was updated every time, even if it only
>scrolled one row.  It seems that they have some optimizing to do.

I think either the machine was overloaded or something was really amiss.
While certain applications can make telnetting into OS/2 *really* slow,
most stuff - especially just the command line - should be reasonably fast.
Unfortunately, many of the slower applications are editors, as they have
often been written to do screen updates beneath the cover and then just
issue a VioShowBuf for the entire screen.

What sort of terminal emulation were you using?  It's been a while (and
I'll try it out myself tomorrow in the office), but I seem to remember that
certain terminal types were much slower than others.  I'm pretty sure that
vt100 was pretty good, but ansi was slower since it lacked the same support
for scrolling regions that the vt100 has.  Or vice versa :-)

>OK, so the impression I have got from the answers are that the telnet
>daemon really can execute any (almost) text session.  So let me change
>the question.  Would there be any interest in a solution that allows you
>to execute any (almost) text _DOS_ application from the telnet daemon?

I'd go for it.  I don't think it would be possible under 1.3 (when this
stuff was initially designed), but if it could be pulled off under 2.0
(especially if it supported interaction with the DOS sessions) I think it
would be great.

--
-- David
--
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------\
 \              David Bolen             \  Internet: db3l@ans.net      /
  |   Advanced Network & Services, Inc.   \   Phone: (914) 789-5327   |
 / 100 Clearbrook Road, Elmsford, NY 10523  \   Fax: (914) 789-5310    \
\-----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking,comp.sys.novell,bit.listserv.novell
From: jimmy@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov (Jimmy Mosquera)
Subject: Novell Netware with SUN PCNFS
Summary: Can't get Novell and PCNFS to work together. 
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 16:30:38 GMT


Is their anybody out there who knows of a way to make SUN PCNFS and Novell
Netware 3.11 coexist peacefully on the same PC?
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Run Pathworks AND Novel?
From: regy106@csc.canterbury.ac.nz (John, Registry)
Date: 14 Aug 92 18:17:42 +1200
Organization: University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

Hi,
	I have ordered the novel requester for OS/2, and digital had said that
pathworks for os/2 2.0 is out so I have ordered that as well.
	Can I use both of these at once?  I want to access my novel server and 
the pathworks server at the same time.  Under windows you use co-exist.
What I need under OS/2?  I do not have IBM's Lan Services for OS/2 2.0, do
I need this to run any of these products?

Thanks for any replies, John
From: phaethon@sara.cc.utu.fi (Timo Eronen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: remote postscript printing problem
Date: 21 Aug 92 11:20:46 GMT
Followup-To: <1992aug19.040447.5081@midway.uchicago.edu>
Organization: University of Turku, Finland

In article <1992Aug19.215730.2379@alf.pec.co.nz>, paula@alf.pec.co.nz (Paul Andrew) writes:
>
>... Problems printing to appletalk network via sun deleted ...
>
> Unfortunately our LPD host is a VAX running PC/TCP and the LPD has
> almost no options.  You either run it or you don't.  Our problem is
> that the LPD insists on printing a banner to the postscript printer,
> in text rather than postscript (the VAX doesn't seem to know about
> postscript).  The postscript printer tosses the job and no print out
> appears.

How can a VAX run PC/TCP ? Have FTP software made TCP/IP package for VAX
also ? If you're talking about _PC_ running FTP software's LPD then according
to their newest "Newsletter" the version 1.02 of LPD (will be released soon)
will support queues w/o banner page. However, with current release (1.01) you
can also configure it in such a way that the banner page does not harm the
PostScript interpreter.

If you run LPD on your VAX then you might want to try Multinet TCP/IP from
TGV. Send mail sales@tgv.com or get more info from tgv.com by using
anonymous ftp.

> 
> What we do to fix this is print to a file on the OS/2 machine and
> insert a CTRL-D in the front of the file.  This finishes the faulty
> banner job and allows my print job to go through.
> 
> Ironically, the same problem that makes Microsoft Word fail on your
> system - makes it work on mine.  Because Word puts a CTRL-D in for
> me, the file will get through our VAX's brain dead banner printing.
> 
> If anyone has any ideas on how to remove the banner from a VAX LPD or
> how to insert a CTRL-D in front of the postscript file, please mail me
> or post.
> 

Like I said earlier, use Multinet.

> 
> Paul Andrew   PaulA@hal.pec.co.nz    Production Engineering (NZ) Ltd.
> Ph. +64 652 8189     (hi mom!)       P.O. Box 308, Marton, New Zealand
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paul Andrew   PaulA@hal.pec.co.nz    Production Engineering (NZ) Ltd.
> Ph. +64 652 8189     (hi mom!)       P.O. Box 308, Marton, New Zealand

-Timo Eronen, tke@utu.fi
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking