HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v115p8d6@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (I have a cunning plan...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: DEAD AGAIN (*SPOILER*)
Date: 12 Oct 92 14:34:00 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <FOLMER.92Oct12095522@lambda.iesd.auc.dk>, folmer@iesd.auc.dk (Lars Tengstedt) writes...
> 
>Just saw DEAD AGAIN this weekend, great movie, but I have one question
>about it. (Sorry if it has been discussed before).



small spoilers...










> 
>In hypnosis Amanda sees the male main character (can`t remember his
>name) in her past life. She then wakes up and says something like: You
>were there, You were trying to kill me. And we saw Mrs. Strauss in the
>bed. That must meen that Amanda is Mrs. Straus, but then later we
>learn during male characters hypnosis that HE was Mrs. Strauss.
> 
>Would anyone like to commend on this and please try to explain it.

When Amanda was put under hypnosis, she was told to disassociate herself
from the action. Therefore we get the story told in the third person.
However, because of certain evidence such as the photos of Mrs. Strauss
and the fact that Amanda is female, everone assumes that she is the
reincarnation of the wife. She also assumes that Mike is the reincarnation
of the husband and jumps to the conclusion that he is also the murderer.
It isn't until Mike is hypnotised, without being told to distance himself
from the action, that their identities are revealed. Mike sees himself
in the mirror as Mrs. Strauss.

hope this helps. I haven't seen the movie in a while.:-)
> 
>Thanx a lot !!!
>
From: margaret@cs.arizona.edu (Margaret Newman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA
Keywords: Nov. 13
Date: 14 Oct 92 23:04:18 GMT

I see from previews that Bram Stoker's Dracula is coming out on Nov. 13
(advertised as "Friday the 13th" not simply Nov. 13).  It looks good
from the previews, but that's nothing new.  (sometimes this is the only
good part of a movie)  I hope that it is better than, say, that one
with Louis Jordan climbing down the side of the castle.  Why climb down
when ol' Drac could just fly -I mean, wouldn't that be easier?  You
wouldn't get your clothes dirty, quieter, more freedom of movement.

Will this be as romantic as the one with Frank Langella? ( I probably
spelled his name wrong)  Keneau (Keanu?) will certainly make a much
more interesting Jonathan.

Too bad they don't make Fred Saberhagen's Dracula Tapes into a movie.
THAT was a good book.  Humor, action, adventure, romance.  Great book.

Well, that's my thought for the day.

Remember:

"Blood is thicker than water, and it tastes better, too."

margaret@cs.arizona.edu
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 22:39:47 GMT
Subject: Re: "1492" and Sigourney Weaver
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

In rec.arts.movies, stranger@watserv.ucr.edu (Katherine T Lim) writes:

> 
> Just a reminder...
> 
> "1492" comes out on Friday, Oct. 9.  I believe that
> it's bound to be good.  BTW, are there any Gerard
> Depardieu fanatics out there besides me?  I'd like
> to meet you!
> 
> Happy 43rd birthday to "1492" co-star Sigourney
> Weaver -- the one and only Ripley!!  Does anyone
> know where to write her?  I'm really a big fan.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 			Kathy

I loved this movie.  The screenplay dragged in parts, and I
do not know about the historical accuracy, but this is
a brilliantly crafted movie.  It will get nominated for best picture.

The sets are FANTASTIC.  The costumes are great.  The lighting in
this movie is very impressive.  The backlit scene where
Columbus first meets Isabelle was possibly the most sublimely
lighted scene I have ever seen.  Most of the acting is rather
understated, but quite competent.  Derpardieu's role did
not seem especially challenging, but I though his line delivery
was quite charming.

Do see this movie.  It ia another example of Scott at his best,
as opposed to his worst (legends).


Any opposing views?  I am sure there are.
From: deragon@GROUCHO.CS.NYU.EDU (John Paul Deragon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Film in Washington Square Park
Date: 16 Oct 92 04:02:08 GMT


	The film crews you see in the park for the next week
or two are filming "In Search of Bobby Fischer".  


	The reason I know this is that I was playing a game of 
chess in the Village Chess Shop [230 Thompson St] (Getting my 
butt kicked) last week, when all of a sudden a film crew burst 
in and kinda distracted everyone.

	I was talking to one of the crew hands, and they are
filming at 42nd, and 6th (The park by the NY Public Library),
the South West Corner of Wash. Sq. Park (By the chess tables),
and at the Village Chess shop.


	From what he told me, they will be on location for about
another week in those locations.


	I hope they dont have to film too much more at the Chess 
Shop, as it is kinda hard to play a game, when you have about 30
people with cameras and everything.  (Not to mention the fact that
they kicked us out)  :-|


	Anyway, just thought I would let you know.

	John




-----
John Deragon				 deragon@groucho.cs.nyu.edu
-----
Space is big.  You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly
big it is.   I mean, you  may think it's a long  way down the road to the 
drug store, but that's just peanuts to space.
-- "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"
From: mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Ed McCreary)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: SNEAKERS AND CHEVY CHASE?!?!?
Date: 15 Oct 92 15:59:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: twisto.1992Oct15.155937.2271
Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.

In article <fletch.719111972@camelot> fletch@camelot.bradley.edu (Alan Lurie) writes:
>
>	Okay.  I could have sworn I saw Chevy Chase listed in the paper as
>appearing in SNEAKERS.  However, when I went to see it, I didn't see so much
>as a cameo of him!  What gives???
>
They probably confused him with Dan Ackroyd, who was in the movie and
is another SNL alumni.


--
In the midst of the word he was trying to say,|McCreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com
     In the midst of his laughter and glee,   |Me, speak for Compaq?  
He had softly and suddenly vanished away---   |Yeah, right.
     For the Snark *was* a Boojum, you see.   |#include <stddisclaimer.h>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: leroy@socs.uts.edu.au (Leroy)
Subject: Re: Denholm Elliott
Organization: Computing Sciences, Uni of Technology, Sydney.
Date:  9 Oct 92 02:37:59 GMT

The best Elliot obituary quote I've seen was:

"..he appeared in so many British movies that, at one point, to make a movie
in Britian without Denham Elliot was considered experimental."

--- G M Heinrich  ( leroy@socs.uts.edu.au )
I'll try not to breathe I can hold my head still with my hands and my knees
From: cn@otter.hpl.hp.com (Colin Needham)
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 08:59:38 GMT
Subject: The Actors List (Mit-Q) Part 6 of 8
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.
From: dvp@getafix (Dave Parry)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Reuse of Music in Film Trailers (was: Danny Elfman)
Date: 14 Oct 92 12:51:21 GMT
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

levin@bbn.com (Joel B Levin) writes:
> In article <1aevptINNsch@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cb366@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark B. Bendiksen) writes:
> >
> >Since scoring a film is one of the last steps before release,
> >studios often add scores from other films for the trailers
> >and even some early commercials.
> 
> My favorite example:  this summer, I saw ads for the recent vampire
> movie which featured Meryl Streep (I forget the name).  I was amused
> to note, even as they flashed the credit for Alan Silvestri's music,
> that the score in the ad was the title theme from HBO's "Tales from
> the Crypt" -- by Danny Elfman.
> 
> 	/JBL

Some other examples; music from 'Glory' soundtrack used in the trailer
for 'Backdraft', music from the climax of 'Lifeforce' used in the
trailer for 'Runaway Train' and the theme from Channel 4 News (here
in the UK) used for the montage of stills which served as the trailer 
for 'Pale Rider' (again, here in the UK).

BTW, anyone know what music they used in the trailer for 'Revolution'?
The film and the soundtrack were turkeys IMHO, but the trailer, with
THAT music, was great (again IMHO).
--

Dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ Dave Parry  ICL, Bracknell, Berks, UK | "Send more paramedics.."--
------ email = dvp@oasis.icl.co.uk           | 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dling@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (David Ling)
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 15:16:37 GMT
Subject: Re: Wicked, Bad, Scary Movies. (Recommendations anyone?)
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

"It Came From Within" is pretty wicked, especially the beginning.  The
movie is very dated (70's) however.   

"Rosemary's Baby"

"The Wicker Man"

"Phantasm" with some comic relief

Some obscure movies (except Rosemary's) for your consideration.
From: Andrew.Wilson@cm.cf.ac.uk (Andrew Wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: "1492"
Date: 10 Oct 92 15:19:49 GMT
Organization: University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff, WALES, UK.


>Depardieu is good in _1492_, but I didn't care for the way the character was
>written, and a French Colombus was a little distracting.  (And he was
>occasionaly hard to understand)  But as a big fan, I think you will be happy
>with his performance.

Maybe we should have had an American Colombus?

>Greg Bole                                "What kind of mother would I be if I
>bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu              didn't give my girls tits...tips?"
 
Andre de-Sarcarstique.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: merlyn@ora.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Deckard's name in Blade Runner
Date: 15 Oct 92 22:44:41 GMT
Article-I.D.: romulus.MERLYN.92Oct15154436
Distribution: rec.arts.movies
Organization: Stonehenge Consulting Services; Portland, Oregon, USA

In article <1992Oct15.155413.14300@halcon.dpi.udec.cl> mmedina@halcon.dpi.udec.cl (Mario Medina C.) writes:
	   Me and a coupla friends were just wondering...
	   What was Deckard's first name in Blade Runner?
	   All we could remember was his being called Lt. Deckard several times.

Uh, perhaps Lt. _Replicant_ Deckard?

(ducking... :-)
--
Randal L. Schwartz / Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095
merlyn@reed.edu (guest account) merlyn@ora.com (better for permanent record)
cute quote: "Welcome to Portland, Oregon -- home of the California Raisins!"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: kjmcrae@cayley.uwaterloo.ca (insert name here)
Subject: Re: best movie titles
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 20:16:28 GMT

In article <1bh4f9INNsb4@agate.berkeley.edu>, brianm@soda.berkeley.edu (Brian Markenson) writes:
> In article <13OCT199222200621@portal.lasc.lockheed.com> le01167@portal.lasc.lockheed.com (Ron Nadel) writes:
>
> [...]
> attractive to an audience.  I can think of a LOT of titles of the top of my
> head that definitely piqued my interest when I heard them.  Basic Instinct,
> Total Recall...there's lots.                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^

Gee, what "piqued my interest" in these 2 movies was SHARON STONE!!!
;-)

> Brian Markenson

...km
"I'm a man who respects a good coma." - J.Seinfeld
From: jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Jim Mann)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Lord of the Rings
Date: 13 Oct 92 12:38:16 GMT
Reply-To: jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com

In article <0w2JsB1w164w@cellar.org> revpk@cellar.org (Brian 'Rev  
P-K' Siano) writes:
>         The first REAL adaptation was by Ralph Bakshi, and  
encompassed about 
> the first half of the "Rings" books. No real major names doing the  
voices 
> (except for Anthony Daniels, who played C-3PO), and most oif the  
film was 
> rotocoped to give it a nice, realistic feel. Overall, the  
adaptation wasd 
> done with a genuine love for the source material, and although it  
didn't 
> really end, it wasn't as bad as it could have been. 

No real names doing the voices?  What about John Hurt, doing the
voice of Strider?

I didn't see the "real love for the source material" in  Bakshi's
adaptation.  He seemed to only be looking at the surface of
the books, and not capturing the feel at all.

> 
>         Problem is, it stiffed at the box office, and Rankin-Bass  
decided to 
> adapt the second half of the Rings books in a TV special "The  
Return of the 
> King." Lots of good voices didn't make up for what had to have been  
one of 
> the worst adaptations conceivable, especially a horribly drippy  
ending. 
> (Needless to say, if you hadn't read Tolkien, the film made not one  
lick of 
> sense.)
> 

That's true. The Rankin-Bass Return of the King makes you
really appreciate Bakshi's Lord of the Rings, which shines
in comparison. It's a shame, because their Hobbit was fun. Problem
is, they thought Return of the King should have the same
feel/tone as The Hobbit, and it can't.

--
Jim Mann            
Stratus Computer   jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com  
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: freds@everest.tandem.com (Fred Sabernick)
Subject: Re: Wicked, Bad, Scary Movies. (Recommendations anyone?)
Organization: Tandem Computers Inc., Cupertino CA
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 20:04:55 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.155450.43633@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> 
	   brnt@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Brent E. Dyer) writes:

>	I'm looking for some really frightening movies.  I don't want any of
>those sophomoric, gore movies that hollywood seems to think are scary, but they
>actually aren't.  I want some "I can't turn the light out until tomorrow
>morning because bad things might be coming for me" movies.

Try _Ghost Story_ (1980 I think). It scared the hell out of me when I first
saw it.

-- FCS

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Fred Sabernick
freds@everest.tandem.com
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Monday, 12 Oct 1992 10:48:02 CDT
From: <U28698@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: 1492

I thought the film was excellent, BUT, these are the words of a guy who's so de
ep into movies that he's lost touch with reality.  Just Kidding.  Actually, sin
ce the themes are so audio/visually oriented, people who choose to pay attentio
n more to script than screenplay may well feel a bit jipped (sp?).  Will I watc
h it again?  Probably not, only cause it lacked a big KICK.

As far as the general theme is concerned, I must question whether the point of
the film was to discuss a Biography of Columbus, or the discovery of America.
Judging by the film, and its title, 1492:  THE CONQUEST OF PARADISE, I think it
's more the story of a man, alone, on his quest for 'the garden of eden.'  I th
ink it's the story of a guy on his mission, and his attempts with success or fa
ilure to accomplish this mission.  In essence, perhaps, I am saying the story i
s about Columbus, but in a way, comparing to Malcolm X, who's works discuss his
 attempts to finally reach racial equality, or at least, racial dignity.

Post your ideas.

Salam.
Omer.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: andre@rurutu.wri.com (Andre Kuzniarek)
Subject: Re: Burroughs
Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 21:23:56 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.225543.10474@bsu-ucs.uucp> 01mbmccabe@bsu-ucs.uucp  
writes:
 
> Is this person of any relation to Edgar Rice of the same last name?  
> Just curious...   Anyone?

No.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: nichols@math.umn.edu (Preston Nichols)
Subject: Re: Shooting in circles 
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 19:20:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.163553.11572@cs.ucla.edu> reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter  
Reiher) writes:
> In article <chil.718797449@sfu.ca> chil@fraser.sfu.ca (Keith Lim) writes:
> >
> >I remember a scene in "The Untouchables" where the four leads
> >were sitting around a small table, and while they were talking, the camera
> >went round and round and round and round the table. 
> >
> >  ____>______>_____
> > /                 \
> > |        #2       |
> > ^   #1 Table #3   v Camera goes round and round and round and round...
> > |        #4       | (possibly in the opposite direction)
> > \____<______<_____/
> >
> >I'm sure there are other movies where the camera moves all over the place
> >while shooting continuously.
> 
> This is one of Brian DePalma's favorite camera tricks.  He also used it
> in the recent "Raising Cain", and in "Body Double", and probably in some
> others that I forget.  
> 
> Woody Allen is fond of inverting this shot - putting the camera in the 
> middle of a group of people and panning it around in a circle.  He did
> that in "Hannah and Her Sisters", and, more recently, in "Shadows and
> Fog".
> 
> --
> 		Peter Reiher
> 		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu


This kind of camera motion was one of the principal visual motifs in The Color  
of Money (Scorcese).  He (had) built numerous circular dolly tracks for the  
various scenes.  My guess is that it was partly intended to reproduce the POV  
of a pool hustler who smoothly and almost constantly moves around the table,  
from (pool) shot to shot, but always looking toward the center of the circular  
path, (in contrast to the more familiar POV in which someone moving faces in  
the direction of their motion).  However, some of the most memorable of the  
shots in the film are not actually POV shots:  Tom Cruise's character moves  
around the table, and the camera moves around the table in the opposite  
direction (I think with a slightly larger radius).  TC thus moves in and out of  
the frame, and the whole thing is very kinetic.  For days after seeing this  
film, I was acutely aware of the motion of my eyes through space as I walked  
around.

PN
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: scholl@uvmark.uucp (Kathryn Scholl)
Subject: Re: SNL: Joe Pesci's Opening Monologue
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 17:06:37 GMT
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.

  In article fil@me.utoronto.ca (Filippo A. Salustri) writes:
  >revpk@cellar.org (Brian 'Rev P-K' Siano) writes:
  >
  >>   Basically, while Pesci talked about mending the photograph, he also 
  >>talked, rather graphically, about grabbing her by her eyebrows and slapping 
  >>her around.
  >>   Now, tough guy or not, I wasn't too fond of the idea of the audience 
  >>applauding the idea of beating up a woman, just because she tore up a photo 
  >>of someone. 
  >
  >    Tsk, tsk.  I should think Pesci would have said that about anyone,
  >regardless of gender.  I'd have said the same thing, even though I'm

Yeah Brian, and lighten up!  Remember, SNL *is* a parody, Pesci *was*
doing a comedy routine, and whether or not he was 'serious', he did say
"I'd SMACK her around", not slap, which is a very stereotypical Italian
saying, which was a character he also presumed on a couple of other
sketches in the show.

And the audience, jeez, just thought the APPLICATION OF THIS ITALIAN
ACTOR WAS VERY CLEVER, NOT THAT THEY WERE GOING TO GO OUT AND BEAT
WOMEN AFTER THE SHOW.    Get it?

Ick.  PC-ism at its most nauseating point.

-- 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 Kathryn Scholl  -- Above text reflects opinions of the author, not VMark --
 Vmark Software, Inc., 30 Speen Street, Framingham, MA  01701, USA
 Internet: uvmark!scholl@merk.com, UUCP: uunet!merk.com!uvmark!scholl
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: firestar@leland.Stanford.EDU (Lipton Ann Meredith)
Subject: Re: Movies with people wearing clear plastic
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 01:29:52 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.212528.10934@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca> q1hl@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Nameless CS Student) writes:
>In article <1992Oct9.173256.26020@cbnewse.cb.att.com> gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart) writes:
>>I'd like to see a thread of movies with people going through plate
>>glass.
>
>One obvious example being "Beverly Hills Cop".


Or Heathers.

Firestar
-- 
I don't bite, you know.    | Find me and turn thy | It is better to have loved 
Unless it's called for.    | back on heaven.      | and lost than to have your
-- Audrey Hepburn, Charade | -- R. W. Emerson     | finger caught in a blender.
*******************************************************************************
From: dianetti@acsu.buffalo.edu (Donald J. Dianetti)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: WORST SEQUEL????
Date: 15 Oct 92 14:48:26 GMT
Organization: UB

In article <1bj62iINN7n7@seven-up.East.Sun.COM> joneil@heretix.East.Sun.COM writes:
>So which movies do you guys consider the WORST SEQUEL to a hit movie???
>
>i think       --ROBOCOP really sucked rocks
>                 --ALIEN ^ 3 blew chunks
>                 --PREATOR 2 was a real disappointment
>
>john
Agreed on RoboCop 2.  Also:
F/X 2 didn't work for me at all - lacked the feel of F/X completely 
Superman III - A fine example of the mis-use of comedy
Star Trek V  - A virtual textbook on the mis-use of comedy
 


-- 
Don Dianetti  --  SUNY at Buffalo  --  dianetti@acsu.buffalo.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------
From: stranger@watserv.ucr.edu (Katherine T Lim)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: "1492" and Sigourney Weaver
Date: 9 Oct 92 01:45:27 GMT
Reply-To: stranger@watserv.ucr.edu


Just a reminder...

"1492" comes out on Friday, Oct. 9.  I believe that
it's bound to be good.  BTW, are there any Gerard
Depardieu fanatics out there besides me?  I'd like
to meet you!

Happy 43rd birthday to "1492" co-star Sigourney
Weaver -- the one and only Ripley!!  Does anyone
know where to write her?  I'm really a big fan.

Thanks!

			Kathy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: firestar@leland.Stanford.EDU (Lipton Ann Meredith)
Subject: Re: DEAD AGAIN QUESTION
Keywords: Spoilers
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 00:57:09 GMT

In article <23869@optima.cs.arizona.edu> margaret@cs.arizona.edu (Margaret Newman) writes:
>
>Spoiler Alert
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>
>
>
>
>
>
>This was a great movie, I really enjoyed it.  The biggest question I
>was left with at the end was:
>
>when Roman was going off to get fried, and he had taken the scissors with
>him, who did he stab and why?  This was never explained, at least not that
>I saw or understood.
>
>Could someone enlighten me?
>


The scissor part was just dream, I think, in the same way she was only
imagining Mike Church (not Roman) taking off a mask and trying to kill
Margaret.

Firestar

-- 
I don't bite, you know.    | Find me and turn thy | It is better to have loved 
Unless it's called for.    | back on heaven.      | and lost than to have your
-- Audrey Hepburn, Charade | -- R. W. Emerson     | finger caught in a blender.
*******************************************************************************
From: sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: best movie titles
Date: 15 Oct 92 18:42:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.Bw6EnE.A4s
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (ce) writes:

>In article <719088951.17443@minster.york.ac.uk> pete@minster.york.ac.uk writes:
>>gj@sansome.UUCP (Gerry Johnson) writes:
>>: I want to know what people's favorite movie titles are. I mean those titles
>>: that are so good you want to see the movie without even knowing what it's
>>: about. Those titles that are like a line of poetry.
>>
>>Here's a few of my favourite titles:
>>
>>Surf Nazis Must Die
>>Hell Comes To Frogtown
>>The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-up Zombies
>>Rat Pfink a'Boo Boo
>>Eraserhead
>>
>I'll add a few of my own in a similar vein:

>She Was A Hippy Vampire
>Satan's Sadists
>Eegah!
>Wild Women of Wongo
>They Saved Hitler's Brain
>How Do You Stuff a Wild Bikini?
>Mars Invades Puerto Rico

Let's not forget:

Barn of the Naked Dead
Let's Stuff Susie in the Incinerator (not too sure about this one, but you
get the idea)


                              --Steve Stelter
                                sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu