HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: stranger@watserv.ucr.edu (Katherine T Lim)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Covington Cross
Date: 16 Oct 92 22:10:48 GMT
Reply-To: stranger@watserv.ucr.edu
Followup-To: rec.arts.tv


I'm curious about this program.  Is it a British 
production, or another American show with some
British actors and Americans sporting an English
accent?  Does anyone know for sure?  

In the end credits, I believe that I've seen
"A Thames Production" or something of the like
in small print.  Does this mean ITV?  

Please reply, instead of posting, to my inquiry 
if someone knows the answer.  Thank you.

			The Stranger
From: troberts@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: ARRRGGHH!  "Sky fits heaven..."  GO AWAY!
Date: 7 Oct 92 12:38:34 -0400
Distribution: world
Organization: Georgetown University

In article <Oct.5.22.54.51.1992.13952@pilot.njin.net>, skitchen@pilot.njin.net (Not your average USENET junkie...) writes:
> In article <6344@npri6.npri.com> eric@npri6.npri.com (Eric Williams) writes:
> 
>> Oh, come on, folks, it's not that bad. You're just blowing off steam
>> 'cause most commercials are FILTH and the ones that try to be innovative
>> are run into the ground (along with the rest of the filth). I dare you
>> to sit through 6 consecutive SNUGGLES or HUGGLES commercials for
>> drier sheets or whatever that damn bear is pushing. I bet you'd be
>> prayin' to that old Beat ghod real quick after that...
>> 
> 
> Thanks, Eric, for reminding me of another set of commercials which
> usually get changed on or should have heavy things thrown through the
> TV.  That !@#%ing bear is demonic!  Have you seen the red glow in its
> eyes?  To quote the Frantics, it's bad enough to "make my oatmeal hit
> the wall".
> 
Well, that's what happens when you forget to clean your dryer's lint 
trap.  Spontaneous animation due to accumulated static charge.

T
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Young Indy: When on in Denver?
Date: 7 Oct 92 01:15:58 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout

In article <1992Oct5.143206.1@cubldr.colorado.edu> matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu writes:
<In article <4197@vidiot.UUCP>, brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes:
<> Did you ever think about calling the Denver ABC station yourself and asking?
<> I'll bet that they know the answer.
<
<You didn't finish reading the day's posts before you wrote this, did you?
<If you had you would have noticed that I answered my own question by doing
<exactly that, and posted it for others who might need the info.
<Don't be so smug, next time.  Unpleasentness tends to return threefold.

No I didn't finish reading.  Once I go past an article, I don't return.  I also
didn't expect an answer so soon.

The problem is that too many people post to the net asking the some question
regarding the local station, when all they had to do was call the local station.
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
From: dhosek@linus.claremont.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Silliness, for a change (was Re: Sinead on SNL...YAY SINEAD!)
Date: 10 Oct 92 00:04:38 GMT
Organization: Quixote Digital Typography

In article <BvvFEF.D6H@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, locker@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jon Locker ) writes:
> "Lick Bush in '92"

I tried that once. Left an awful taste in my mouth.

By the way for some of the most amusing television (more bizarre
than David Lynch, Monty Python and Rush Limbaugh put together), 
check ou C-SPAN late nights and weekends when they're doing live
coverage of congress. Two or three guys (at most) reading some of
the strangest things into the congressional record. Ah, democracy
in action.

Anybody got ratings figures on the Ross Perot Charts and Graphs
Show? Now _there's_ quality TV.

-dh (We bring silliness to life)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten)
Subject: Re: SNL - Oct 3, Latest on Sinead reaction
Summary: Opinions on the Pope
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 20:19:28 GMT

In article <1avdpiINNgh6@bigboote.WPI.EDU>, drwho@planet10.WPI.EDU (Eric Ant Von Laudermann) writes:
> What I find amusing is that she was singing up a storm about
> anit-bigotry, and then does this.  OK, some people have come to her
> defense, saying that she was merely expressing her anger as a result
> of her own repressive Catholic chilhood.  (I wouldn't blame her for
> that... I went to Catholic school :-)  But I'm afraid that's not the
> impression one gets when she holds up a picture of the Pope, yells the
> word "EEEEEVVIIIILLLLLLL", rips up the picture, and says "fight the
> real enemy."  If she doesn't really mean "the Pope is evil", she
> should have said it differently.
> 

The whole thing is kind of strange to me.  I'm Jewish and the last
Pope I had an opinion on was John 23rd (I thought he was okay). Beyond
that you'd have to go to the Medieval Popes (I didn't like them).

Still - is it the message or the messenger?  For example, after the
incident they had some spokesman saying "I can't imagine anyone
being against the Holy Father."  Bit of denial there - many people
don't like the Pope - this one or any of them.

I've run into many Catholics who were not thrilled with a Polish
Pope.  many people in the church oppose his stands on Birth Control
and other issues.

Some Protestant sects talk as if the Reformation was last week and
they were still selling indulgences.

There's a cable show called "What Catholics Believe" with a lay 
host and two priests.  I have no idea who they are or where they
fit into the Catholic world (or if they do).  They are anti-Vatican II,
anti-New Mass, anti-Ecumenicalism, and very anti-Pope - at least this
one.  They rip him up right and left for things like traveling the
world and taking part in non-Catholic rites and many other things.

So is it WHAT is said, or WHO says it, or WHY they say it, or HOW
they say it?

marc colten
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: dhosek@hmcvax.claremont.edu
Subject: Government-subsidy broadcasting (Re: Commercial:  Folger's Coffee)
Organization: Quixote Digital Typography
Date: 11 Oct 92 10:57:53 PDT

In article <1992Oct10.204531.18058@adobe.com>, deleon@adobe.com (Michael de Leon) writes:
> In article <ldbd5dINNf7i@news.bbn.com> ahsiung@labs-n.bbn.com (Anita Hsiung) writes:
>>Since advertising is one of the lifebloods of the industry, I think it
>>is an important enough subject to be discussed.  (I can hear the
>>snickers now... ;^) ) Where do you think freedom of the press comes
>>from?  Putting aside the fact that TV journalism can be bought, do you
>>think that any government-subsidized television can be unbiased?

> I'm not quite sure what you were getting at here, but for govt-subsidized
> journalism which is unbiased check out the BBC in England. 

You don't even have to go that far. While the US government
(thanks to  12 years of Reaganbush) has been progressively
cutting funding and looking askance at anything they don't like,
American public broadcasting is doing a decent job of keeping
government funding from influencing programming/editorial
decisions. Remember, the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill story was
broken by NPR. Any arguments of bias I've heaard against NPR,
APR, PBS is the opposite of what you might suggest. But yes,
vigilance is always warranted.

-dh
From: gmkoenig@acsu.buffalo.edu (Gerson V Koenig)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: YIJC: Gilliam to direct?
Date: 13 Oct 92 05:32:23 GMT
Organization: UB

I recently saw a posting on a.f.monty-python saying Terry Gilliam will be the
director for an episode of Indy this season. Is there are any truth to this?
How can I know when this will air? (No, I don't get TV Guide, I don't even own
a tv, I'm a college student...)

Gerson Koenig
gmkoenig@acsu.buffalo.edu
From: Gordon_Wong@mindlink.bc.ca (Gordon Wong)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: GOING TO EXTREMES (10/06 Episode)
Date: 7 Oct 92 22:27:53 GMT
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Distribution: world

What is it with Falsey and Co. this week? Is it sleep deprivation week this
week? After Joel's sleeping problems on Northern Exposure (10/05), Charlie
develops sleeping problems on Going To Extremes (10/06). They both conked out
and went into a deep sleep on both shows. Did they run out of storylines or
something?

For those who gave up on Going To Extremes after the canoe making episode,
you should know that the show is actually getting better ... or maybe I'm
just tired :) Still, I find the show interesting, yet I am frustrated because
I can not sometimes pick up what the "natives" are saying half the time.


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: steve.miller@rose.com (steve miller)
Subject: BH90210: Brenda&Dylan
Organization: Rose Media Inc, Toronto, Ontario.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 06:38:01 GMT
X-Gated-By: Usenet <==> RoseMail Gateway (v1.70)


Date Entered: 10-14-92 01:30

AS 1.   Until the end of this year's television season, do you think
        Brenda and Dylan will:
        D.  Split up on mutual agreement because Brenda wants to date
            Rick and Dylan wants to date Kelly
   2.   Which character is better?
        B.  Dylan
AS 3.   Who do you think is a better actor?
        B.  Luke Perry
AS 4.   If you could change something about Brenda's appearance, what
        would it be?
        D.  Fishnet stockings and a leather skirt.
AS 5.   If you could change something about Dylan's appearance, what
        would it be?
        D.  Grow his hair long and wear 20+ hole Docs
AS 6.   If you believe Brenda and Dylan will split up, when do you
        think it will happen?
AS      A.  Before Christmas

---
   OLX 2.1 TD   Don't eat the yellow snow.
   RoseMail 2.00 : Usenet: Rose Media - Hamilton (416) 575-5363
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.sf.tv
From: sallylb@netcom.com (Sally Smith)
Subject: QL: Update to my last news
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 19:43:48 GMT

Hokay, 30 lashes with a wet noodle to my news source. The correction
is that next week, Scott Bakula begins directing Tommy Thompson's
Christmas episode. As always, Scott's quite looking forward to it.

Sally

-- 
Sally Smith (510)790-0608  sallylb@netcom.com (I was sally@tardis.tymnet.com)
I'm unemployed--these opinions *must* be mine!
"Don't investigate this too closely." -- Don Bellisario, re: "Quantum Leap"

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: ed@cwis.unomaha.edu (Ed Stastny)
Subject: Re: Sinead O'Connor's a whiner
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 13:56:27 GMT

peake@uncavx.unca.edu writes:

>O'Conner is just a big whiner. Her agenda seems to be little more than stirring

And you're the one who spent two paragraphs whining about her?
 
Hypocrisy?
...e

--
 ____                     + Editor, SOUND News and Arts magazine
|____                     + PO BX 31104, Omaha,NE 68131 (lg SASE for copy)
|____ D@CWIS.UNOMAHA.EDU  + SOUND FTPable: quartz.rutgers.edu(pub/journals) 
(Ed Stastny/UNO/Omaha,NE) +                141.214.4.135(docs/zines/sound)
From: garvey@skybridge.SCL.CWRU.Edu (Heather Garvey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: RD: The Interpreter!
Date: 9 Oct 1992 21:49:33 GMT
Organization: Smith Undergrad Lab, CWRU, Cleve. OH
NNTP-Posting-Host: marina.scl.cwru.edu
X-Post-Machine: marina.scl.cwru.edu

lsnow@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Linda Snow) writes:
>garvey@skybridge.SCL.CWRU.Edu (Heather Garvey) writes:
>>
>>	2) What is the actor's name? I didn't think he was in the
>>opening credits and the closing credits have the DOG'S name but
>>not his...It just says "Interpreting by: <some company>" 
>
>Well I could be wrong about this, but I *think* that's Marlee Matlin's
>real interpreter.  I remember seeing her on TV a couple of times years ago,
>on Oscar shows and suchlike and she had this guy interpreting for her
>part of the time.  Sure looks like the same guy.

	When she was on the Tonight Show, it was a different interpreter.
Some dark-haired guy that reminded me of Gilbert Goddfrey...I've never
seen them together on other shows, but then again, I didn't watch the 
Oscars. :)

>BTW, whatever happened to Dicky's interpreting for her?  Why does she
>need 2 different people?

	Well, because it's not really Dickie's job. I can't remember if 
in the beginning of the series, he was chosen to be her investigator 
because he could also interpret, but he's NOT a professional interpreter.
In the courtroom and other official settings, Tess should have someone
whose only job is translating. I've seen a lot of interrogation 
scenes where Dickie will get so caught up in the action Tess has to 
actually remind him that it would be nice if he'd let her in on the 
conversation. :) That, and he has to be out doing investigator-ly
things for most of the day and Tess needs someone to be there all the 
time (or at least *available* all the time...).  Dickie still does a 
lot of the interpretting in informal settings...
	And IMHO, the interpreter has a better courtroom voice, too. :)

--
	" ...dealing with Free-Net makes me very angry  | Heather "Moose"
and gives me thoughts of breaking things and torturing  | Garvey, Biochem 93'
small animals. "   --  Bruce Ikenaga <bxi@po.cwru.edu>  | <hlg@po.cwru.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael Rosen)
Subject: Re: HIGHLANDER
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 00:18:42 GMT

I caught most of this premiere and was very impressed.  I'd say they
have redeemed themselves for the attrocity of Highlander 2.

Mike
--
Michael Rosen						"Beer - It does
Tau Epsilon Phi - George Washington University		 a body good."
mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu
Michael.Rosen@bbs.oit.unc.edu or @lambada.oit.unc.edu
From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Laurie Hill
Date: 15 Oct 1992 19:38:32 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: telecaster.think.com

In article <1992Oct15.153721.14126@cbfsb.cb.att.com> van@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (valerie.thompson) writes:
>  Maybe it's my guilt about not being super mom,
>like Laurie is, that makes me not like the show.

Hmm, I thought it was Laurie's guilt over not being a super mom that caused
her to make the costume herself.

If you'd seen previous shows, you'd know that she isn't a super mom.  The
theme of this show is that her family often takes a back seat to her
professional duties, and she's trying to figure out how to balance things.
-- 
Barry Margolin
System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com          {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
From: jeffy@cray.com (Jeffrey Neau)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: About "Three's Company, Too!"
Date: 13 Oct 92 14:14:15 GMT
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.

In article <1992Oct13.052534.29265@midway.uchicago.edu> pynq@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>I'm a long time "3's Company" fan, but I am confused by the "sequel"
>series, "Three's Company, Too!"  This is the one that has Jack living
>with a chick named Vicki, with constant interference by her father (played
>by the lovable Robert Mandan - better known as Chester Tate) and a surfer
>dude played by Alan Campbell.
>
>Anyway, here is my question: Does anyone know what the "story" is?
>I.e., how did they get from the three folks in the original apartment to
>Jack living in a completely different apt, with a completely different
>supporting cast?

On the last episode or two of Three's Company, Jack and 'Vicki' began dating.
I think he wanted to get married, but she just wanted to live together.
I'm pretty sure Janet was going to get married.  They all split.

>Also, what exactly is the "situation" between Jack and Vicki?

Living together

>Are they "doing it"?

Most certainly

> If so, why aren't they married?

See above

> Is she on the Pill?

Nope.  Jack used condoms.

>
>Enquiring minds...
>-------------
>Ob3sCompanyTrivialQuestion:  What do Quarterdeck Office Systems (makers
>of Desqview and QEMM) and "3's Company" have in common?
>
>************************************************************************
>A note to new readers:  the weasely :-) symbol is frowned upon in this
>group.  Any questions, see Phil Gustafson who will gladly rearrange your
>diodes for you.
>			- From the AFU FAQ -
>
>	- pynq@quads.uchicago.edu, who is still costing the net
>	  hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars, every time he posts -
>************************************************************************
From: rnlee@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Profess'nal Agitator)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Young Indiana Jones in the Pacific Time Zone?
Date: 14 Oct 92 17:25:04 GMT
Organization: MAWL - Mudd Alums Without Lives

I can understand why people in Denver (and the rest of the Mountain
Zone) have problems finding YIJ, but why should there be a problem
with the Pacific?  The game ends well before 9:30.  What the hell are
your affiliates showing?

Used to be that KABC (LA) would show Macgyver around 9:15, but then
the locals decided to add a sports post-game, so it would run around
10-ish, but it was always in prime time.

KNSD (San Diego) also runs a post-game plus one of those depraved
tabloid shows.  They've been 4-for-4 in getting Indy on by 10pm this
season.

Now, the Eastern and Central affiliates are given 8pm before the
game, but aren't the Pacific stations supposed to show it at either 9
or 10?

Agitator
  #->

"A political deadend."                  Bruce Herschensohn for U.S. Senate!!!
    --Gore on the Vice Presidency when    Not the ten-year       //  The REAL
      asked about a Dukakis-Gore ticket   Congress insider      //   outsider
--------------- R E M E M B E R   B E I J I N G ------------\\ //------------
IBM PC - Who wants a politically correct computer?           \X/  Only AMIGA!
========================================== Bring Back the Caltech Cannon!! ==
Roderick Lee, HMC '91      "The Professional Agitator"      agitator@ucsd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: helen@pulua.hcc.hawaii.edu (Helen Rapozo)
Subject: Re: "Police Squad" - Americans with no sense of humour ?
Organization: Honolulu Community College
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 20:54:55 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.154118.1@aud2.aud.auc.dk> i6finn@aud2.aud.auc.dk writes:
>Subject: "Police Squad" - Americans with no sense of humour ?
>
>Naked Gun and Naked Gun 2 1/2 are two of my favourite movies.
>Right now Police Squad is on Danish TV and they are even better.
>Questions:
>
>  1) They only broadcast 6 episodes. There are no more - the
>     series stopped due to lack of interest in the US !!!!!
>     Is that true ? (now you understand the subject-line)
*******
Yes this is true.  You are lucky.  Last year they re-broadcast the
series but they only showed 5 out of the 6.

>
>  2) What year was Police Squad made ? Do they make fun of
>     a particular tv-show ?
*******
Early 80's.  They may make fun of those Quinn Martin productions
like Streets of San Fransisco, Cannon, etc.

>
>I am sorry if I offended someone with the subject-line.
*******
Shows get cancelled here because of low ratings at the time.
>
>Please E-mail and thanks in advance ......

Honolulu Community College            cs_rapozo@hccadb.hcc.hawaii.edu
874 Dillingham Blvd.                  helen@pulua.hcc.hawaii.edu
Honolulu, HI 96817                    rapozo@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu
Ph#: (808) 845-9202
From: ST1450@SIUCVMB.SIU.EDU (Steve Fellows)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: QL: new QL/ST:TNG crossover on alt.startrek.creative
Date: 7 Oct 1992 15:30:49 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

This is where most of the QL people hang out, so I figure some of you
might like to know that over on alt.startrek.creative, Katriena Knights
has just posted a sequel to the Quantum Leap/Star Trek: The Next
Generation crossover story she posted back in June.
I won't give away any spoilers, but I'll say that it bends QL's leaping
rules all to hell and the author does take some liberties with the
characters, but it's fan fiction, so it's not like it'll ever be part
of canon. (Besides, Al's reactions to Beverly & Deanna are more than
worth any problems with the story.)

If your site doesn't get alt.startrek.creative and you want to read it,
drop me a note at one of the addresses below and I'll mail you the
current story and/or the original.

Steve

ST1450@siucvmb.siu.edu
ST1450@siucvmb.bitnet
st1450@aix370.siu.edu
an321@cleveland.freenet.edu
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: It isn't sodee pop, it's coke (was folgers blab)
Date: 13 Oct 92 22:10:30 GMT
Organization: Chevron

(Louise Penberthy) writes:
>(SCOTT GREEN) writes:
>>(Phil Smith) writes:
>>>Parts of Eastern US call it SODA. Eastern PA, NJ, NYC.
>>>In northern Ohio it's POP.
>>>Down South they call everything "Cokes".
>>And, up in parts of New England, its Tonic.
>
>While growing up in Seattle, I said "pop."  When I moved to
>Chicago, I learned to say "soda."  Now that I live in Atlanta, I
>still say "soda."  I haven't heard anyone down here say "Coke"
>(in the generic sense), as someone else mentioned, or even
>"co-cola."  :-)

Really?  You live in Atlanta and you haven't heard this?   ...yankee...

Typical Deep South dialogue:

  BILLY BOB:  "Ya wanna coke er something?"
   JIM FRED:  "Yup."
  BILLY BOB:  "OK.  Wudda ya want?"
   JIM FRED:  "Oh, dot co-cola wull do." (Diet Coca-Cola)

...quality threads die hard....

-- 
**************************************************************************
GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!!	| Andy: "Howdy boys........."
GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!!!!    | Andy: "...Yer boys are mighty talkative today."
James Clyde  LSU '91    | Briscoe: "Yeh,...they's all keyed up."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: jeffy@cray.com (Jeffrey Neau)
Subject: Re: Taster's Choice (was Commercial:  Folger's Coffee)
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:58:45 CDT

In article <1992Oct9.180806.9138@cbnewsc.cb.att.com> kimes@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (Kit Kimes) writes:
>
>Personally, I like the serial commericials.


I like them too!  Remember that one where Cap'n was looking for the Crunchberry
Beast?  That was great!

Then that one with the little Cookie Crisp wizard.  What ever happened to him?

And then the Life commercial with Mikey.  Wow...
From: colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten)
Subject: Re: Commercial:  Folger's Coffee
Summary: Lousiest commerical on TV
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 20:01:13 GMT

In article <ld660eINN91o@news.bbn.com>, ahsiung@bbn.com (Anita Hsiung) writes:
> That commercial with the British woman and American male neighbour
> (yes, I know both actors are British)..  Who is the man in her
> apartment in the latest installment?  Neighbour comes over, the man
> says polite, ambiguous comments to confuse him about their
> relationship, then offers him coffee.  WHO IS HE?  And why is he
> trying to ruin the game??  (Okay, I'm calm now.)
> 
> 	-- Anita --
> 

This commercial is why I'm glad I don't keep guns in the house.  Why
I'd take a lot less than the $1,000,000 TV guide mentioned to give up
TV.  I HATE this commercial.  The weirdest part is that it is the
only commercial I've ever seen that was advertised!  Some ad about
"coming soon, our new coffee commercials".  This commercial sucked
from the beginning.  I don't even drink coffee, but I'd buy their's
if they end the commercials by having all those people killed by
terrorists.

Actually there's only one way they could have saved this commercial.
Instead of having him say "she's changing" - give a variation of the
answer Danny DeVito gave in RUTHLESS PEOPLE. Now THAT would be a
commercial!


marc colten