HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gary@.ingr.com (Gary Girzon)
Subject: Montreal Film Festival
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 21:42:31 GMT

Could someone post the winner of the Montreal Film Festival?

BTW, it was a bigger festival than in previous years with about 300
films. I caught three films at the tail end of the festival, the best
being a German film, _Appletrees_, about life in what was East Germany
at the time before and shortly after the fall of the wall. Stark realism,
to say the least.

The other two films, _Broken Butterly_ (Spain) and _A Piece of the 
Challenger_ (France/Russia) were well done but had depressing themes.
None of these films were in competition. It seems that all the best known
films, especially French or Italian, sold out very quickly.

There were quite a few US films shown such as _Wind_ and _Singles_.
Also, _Husbands and Wives_ was supposed to have closed the festival
but that was changed. I believe it was shown at earlier date.
_Best Intentions_ was screened outdoors for free.

For those interested in world cinema, Montreal is a great film festival!



-- 
"Somebody's boring me... I think it's me"
					Dylan Thomas

Gary Girzon	gary@optron.ingr.com		   (508) 250-8691
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: GC.FTT@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullivan)
Subject: Re: Leon Redbone?
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 01:16:28 GMT

I'm a big Leon Redbone fan.  Is it possible you saw him in an episode
of Life Goes On?  I don't remember seeing him in a released film.
Mike
From: jxxl@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Of Mice and Men
Keywords: movies, steinbeck, censure
Date: 14 Sep 92 17:07:30 GMT
Reply-To: jxxl@cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke)
Distribution: rec
Organization: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA

mem@mv.mv.com (Mark E. Mallett) writes:

> Somebody mentioned that in rec.arts.books the other day; I asked what was
> the basis for objecting to this book, and nobody could (or would) say.  Do
> you have any idea why somebody would boycott this book?

Probably because it ends with a mercy killing.

John
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: gunnarh@dhhalden.no (GUNNAR HORRIGMO)
Subject: Re: REALLLLLLY bad embarassing movies
Organization: Ostfold College
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 06:18:36 GMT

In article <18nr8aINNpid@network.ucsd.edu> ivy@chem.ucsd.edu (Ivy Blumberg) writes:
>From: ivy@chem.ucsd.edu (Ivy Blumberg)
>Subject: Re: REALLLLLLY bad embarassing movies
>Date: 10 Sep 1992 15:56:58 GMT
>
>I can't believe noone has mentioned "Pink Flamingos"
>Talk about revolting! 
>
That's just what makes it so good.

------G
From: otto@jybox.jyu.fi (Otto J. Makela)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: TRIVIA:  Potemkin quotat
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 22:09:46 EDT
Organization: Jyvaskyla Electronic Mailbox

sws8n@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Stefan William Sittig) writes:

> There is a scene in MILLER'S CROSSING that shows a shot of four(?) mobsters
> climbing steps and all you see in the shot are their feet climbing the steps
> in a ryhthmical fashion, like the soldiers on the Odessa Steps in "Potemkin".

Can't say for sure, not having seen MC, but the soldiers in Potemkin
are coming DOWN the steps, firing.

   /* * * Otto J. Makela <otto@jybox.jyu.fi> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */
  /* Phone: +358 41 613 847, BBS: +358 41 211 562 (V.32bis/USR-HST,24h/d) */
 /* Mail: Kauppakatu 1B18/SF-40100 Jyvaskyla/Finland, ICBM: 62.14N25.44E */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */
From: ahsiung@bbn.com (Anita Hsiung)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: HONEYMOON IN VEGAS -- Quick Impressions
Date: 10 Sep 1992 00:54:17 GMT
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
Reply-To: ahsiung@labs-n.bbn.com (Anita Hsiung)
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com


Steve Scher writes:
>Here are some very quick impressions of Honeymoon in Vegas:
>
>I did not find the film particularly funny or enjoyable (see Mark Leeper's 
>review, which I agree with fairly completely). I think that Bergman's THE 
>IN-LAWS is a classic, and I thought THE FRESHMAN was quite good, but this
>just was flat -- few laughs, and loads of problems.
>
>I agree with other viewers that the Elvis gags tended to wear thin, although
>I thought it was a clever idea, especially the flying Elvis'.

I haven't seen any other Bergman films, so I can't compare, but I
LOVED this one!  The Elvises were hilarious.  Especially the very
first scene in Bally's as Betsy and Jack were walking in.

>The worst thing about this movie, IMO, was the fact that Sarah Jessica
>Parker seemed to be restricted to dressing in bathing suits or skin-tight
>dresses (the one exception, MAYBE, is her first scene where she is shown
>at her job at the school).  I thought this was exploitative and out of
>character for Betsy.  (NOTE: I think Sarah Jessica is a very attractive
>woman, physically, andtherefore looked very good in these costumes, butit
>was just exploitation).

This was true, to a certain extent.  Very skimpy, skin-tight outfits
and the shots of her walking around, obviously parading, were out of
character with the sweet kindergarten teacher image.

Possible spoiler:


I thought pacing was fantastic; Nicholas Cage was very good,
understated, not the sarcastic, "Growing Pains" type of humour, James
Caan was great.  I thought the degeneration into the vile villian was
necessary to finally convince Betsy just what kind of a dangerous man
she was dealing with.

It was a very enjoyable afternoon, made my whole weekend, actually!
Can't wait to see it again, in any form, video, whatever...

	-- Anita --


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Anita Hsiung       | "See how easy life can be?" -- Johnathan Raven     |
| ahsiung@bbn.com    |                                                    |
| BBN Canoga Park    | "Someday we'll look back on this moment...and      |
| California, USA    |  run smack into the car in front of us."  -- Ski   |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: movie about Green Flash?
Date: 12 Sep 92 14:09:06 GMT
Organization: DB and ES Subdivision, TU Vienna

From article <BuGuE5.9q@apollo.hp.com>, by stave@apollo.hp.com (Joel H. Stave):
> In article <1992Sep11.164053.15760@osf.org>, steiner@ninja.osf.org
> (Jennifer Steiner) writes:
> |> Hi, does anybody know what movie had the "green flash" effect
> |> in it?

> thinking it was a pretty good movie.  Something about land developers
> wanting to build and local townspeople wanting to stop them (I think)

That was obviously based on the novel by John D. MacDonald.  However,
there's also a French film, directed by Eric Rohmer, whose title
translates to that phrase.  Don't know if his films ever reach the US.
-- 
Markus Stumptner                                mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
University of Technology Vienna                 vexpert!mst@relay.eu.net
Paniglg. 16, A-1040 Vienna, Austria             ...mcsun!vexpert!mst
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27825 alt.cult-movies:7934
From: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: TRIVIA:  Potemkin quotations
Date: 15 Sep 92 17:58:27 GMT
Reply-To: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies

In article <1992Sep8.000141.26600@news2.cis.umn.edu>,
nichols@math.umn.edu (Preston Nichols) writes:
|>I have been for some years been accumulating a list a movies which quote or  
|>pastiche (part of) the very famous "Odessa steps" sequence from Eisenstein's
|>masterpiece "The Battleship Potemkin". (To jog memories:  soldiers
descending  
|>the steps abreast, firing into the crowd as they go; a man with
glasses shot in  
|>the eye; the baby carriage rolling down the steps)     ^^^
|>

    A woman surely. I have a large still of this shot and it looks like
a woman to me.

   I saw a short film on British Tv once that basically took the whole
Odessa steps sequence and inserted full colour characters in amonst the
crowd and the soldiers. The dialogue that these inserted characters
speak forms the basis of the film. Sorry I forget the title.
             
+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Gary Bradley        |   "You receive a love letter from me and |
| ORACLE Corp, UK     |                  you're f*cked forever!" |
| Edinburgh, SCOTLAND |        - Frank Booth ("Blue Velvet")     |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| "God damn the censor man"                                      |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
From: trudel@athos.rutgers.edu (Jonathan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Blade Runner in NJ (or NYC or Philly)?
Date: 14 Sep 92 21:05:53 GMT
Distribution: nj,ny,pa
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

Has anyone seen where it's playing in NJ, New York City, or Philadelphia?  
If so, where?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies,rec.video.releases
From: hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu (Eiji Hirai)
Subject: Re: Blade Runner Director's Cut (SPOILERS)
Organization: Information Services, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 04:04:02 GMT

dododge@wam.umd.edu (David O. Dodge) writes:
> And here's something to chew on: ** I saw Holden's eyes glow **

That's interesting.  In Philip K. Dick's novel, there's some hinting that
Deckard's partner may be a replicant.

--
Eiji Hirai <hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu>    :     :    :   :  : :: ::: :::: :::::
Unix Geek for Swarthmore College        :     :    :   :  : :: ::: :::: :::::
Information Services, Swarthmore, PA, USA.      Copyright 1992 by Eiji Hirai.
I don't speak for Swarthmore College.                    All Rights Reserved.
From: bodarky@cme.nist.gov (Scott Bodarky)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Is Werner Herzog's 1979 "Nosferatu" available?
Date: 9 Sep 92 14:46:17 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology


This film is impossible to find. I know of one copy a local
cinemaphile shop has for rent, but it's apparently dubbed; I don't
watch dubbed movies, so that won't do.  I've heard that there are
legal matters that are responsible for its scarcity.  Was it ever
available?

Anyone know what I'm talking about?

-Scott (bodarky@cme.nist.gov)| "The American public knows what it wants,
			     |  and deserves to get it good and hard."
  The National Institute     |  
 of Standards & Technology   |  	-H. L. Mencken
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rjn@FC.HP.COM (Bob Niland)
Subject: Re: To all who have seen Blade Runner: The Director's Cut
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 17:23:24 GMT
Reply-To: rjn@FC.HP.COM
Organization: Hewlett-Packard/WSY Ft.Collins,CO,USA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1scd1 PL4

steveh@devildog.att.com (Steve Hendershott) writes:
> Will this cut be available on video tape for those who can't see it
> in the theatre?

Almost certainly, given that theatrical exhibition of films is now just a
way to market video.  Furthermore, even at $90, the CAV LaserDisc edition
of the original 1982 BladeRunner has been the most popular (and first
profitable) LD that Voyager Company (Criterion Collection) made.  BladeRunner
is a marketable cult property, with a following exceeded by few other titles.

The real question is whether or not it will go into general release after
this major-city-only limited run is concluded.

Regards,                                              Hewlett-Packard
Bob Niland      Internet: rjn@FC.HP.COM               3404 East Harmony Road
                CompuServe:  71044,2124               Ft Collins CO 80525-9599

This article represents only the opinion[s] of its author, and is not an
official or unofficial position of, or statement by, the Hewlett-Packard
Company.  The text is provided for informational purposes only.  It is
supplied without warranty of any kind.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: gre253@mis.csiro.au (Steven Green)
Subject: Heres on for you Alien freaks !
Organization: CSIRO ITS
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 02:11:49 GMT

OK - So I know said enough Alien stuff already. But this is different.

I rented the widescreen version of Alien last night. And after watching it
went back over some of the kill scenes with the old jog-shuttle.

The scene where Parker cops it with the meccano-jaw thru the neck(?) is
very interesting frame-at-a-time. For a start the whole "scene" only lasts
for 4-5 frames. Secondly the meccano-jaw is white (plastic?) - a very un-alien
colour. The other thing was the amount of detail that was given to the bits
of tissue that lept forth after the impact. It seemed to me to be a bit over
the top for something as short as 4-5 frames. Played at normal speed you
get a very fleeting _impression_ of what happened, but then again that
was probably the intention.

OK - let the jog-shuttle gun fight commence!


-- 
* Steve Green     *  "Hey Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit outa my hat!"    *
* Comms Group     *  "That trick never works"                            *
* ITS Branch      *  "Nothin' up my sleeve - PRESTO"                     *
* CSIRO Australia *  "No doubt about it - I gotta get another hat"       *
From: hellmann@iowa.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Dirk Hellmann )
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: REALLLLLLY bad embarassing movies
Date: 14 Sep 1992 07:50:38 GMT
Organization: CS Department, Dortmund University, Germany
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: iowa

	HUDSON HAWK - a big piece of SHIT. Silly Story. Bad Playing.

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|                      \\|//  /----------------\            \_\_\_|
| Dirk Hellmann         O O   | You can't feel |              \_\_|
| Junggesellenstr. 5     |    | the beating    |                \_|
| 4600 Dortmund 1       \_/ --\----------------/                  |
| GERMANY                                                 e-mail: |
|                      hellmann@avalon.informatik.uni-dortmund.de |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
From: cn@otter.hpl.hp.com (Colin Needham)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 05:47:17 GMT
Subject: Movie Database Scripts (partial update)
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.
From: hopkins@agora.rain.com (Scott Hopkins)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: Open Communications Forum
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 03:47:09 GMT

In article <1992Sep4.072230.5860@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg> gckchin@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Kelvyn Chin) writes:
>hopkins@agora.rain.com (Scott Hopkins) writes:
>: 	Alas, fellow Home Alone haters!  I cannot stand this movie!  When I
>: first saw it, it had been out for quite some time.  This gave my friends
>: and family plenty of opportunity to push me to seeing it!  I have not
>: forgiven them yet.
>
>Hey, give them a break !!! :)
>
> 	The movie was full of cutesy humor that made me want to vomit!  I
>: found it to be quite unrealistic and quite stupid!  The theater was packed
>: with children that had seen it several times before.  They actually laughed
>: before the jokes came around.  I wasn't even laughing when I left the
>: theater.  It made me think about the state of people's mind that can sit
>: and enjoy such trash and make it the second biggest money maker that year!
>:
>Hey, all my friends (especially the ladies) seemed to be that way as well!
>
>
> 	Macaulay Caulkin (Or however the hell you spell his name) is making
>: a couple million dollars for Home Alone 2!  Give me a break!  i can't wait
>: to see the little bastard turn into one of Hollywood's drug babies!
>:
>Hey, give the poor kid a break !!!!  :)
>
>
> 	The only scene I found to be somewhat funny is when John Candy was
>: telling the story of leaving his child in a funeral parlor and how he didn'
>: t talk for two-three months.  But, I was the only one laughing in the
>: entire theater on that scene!
>: 
>: 			-Casey Hopkins
>: 			hopkins@agora.rain.com
>:
>Actually, I agree totally with you. Home Alone was the most nauseating piece
>of work *ever*. And I *hate* Macaulay Culkin! I especially hate myself
>for watching the show. It was actually worse than _Ghost_ and _Pretty Woman_!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer)
Subject: Buckaroo Banzai credits (was: Upcoming Stephen King Movie)
Reply-To: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer)
Organization: The John Fluke Mfg. Co.  /a.k.a. The Gizmonics Institute/
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 07:27:09 GMT

In <1992Sep9.161612.23419@cs.ucla.edu> reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher) writes:
>The script will be written by
>W.D. Richter, best known as the screenwriter for "Buckaroo Banzai".

A rare day when I can correct Peter Reiher.  Richter directed BUCKAROO
BANZAI; Earl Mac Rauch wrote the screenplay (though Richter was certainly
involved with it.)  Richter did write the screenplay to John Carpenter's BIG
TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA, though.

                           "Eight years is too long for anyone to go without
                            skills or purpose."
                                           -- George Bush
---
                                        Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer
INTERNET:     moriarty@tc.fluke.COM
Manual UUCP:  {uunet, uw-beaver, sun, microsoft}!fluke!moriarty
CREDO:        You gotta be Cruel to be Kind...
                 **>> Keep circulating the tapes <<**
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dododge@wam.umd.edu (David O. Dodge)
Subject: Re: Blade Runner Director's Cut (SPOILERS)
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 20:51:26 GMT

In article <YGHQB3PQ@cc.swarthmore.edu> hirai@cc.swarthmore.edu (Eiji Hirai) writes:
>kachun@astro.as.arizona.edu (Ka Chun Yu) writes:
>
>Some more errors, some of which may be deliberate.
>
>* The close-up on Roy's hands clenching into a fist when he's in the phone
>booth at the start of the movie - this is the exact same film stock of Roy
>clenching his fist right before he puts a nail through his hands at the end
>of the movie.

Look closer: It isn't a shot from before he puts the nail through his
hand, it's a shot from *AFTER*! In the last few frames of that shot he
begins to turn his hand and you can see the nail sticking out the back.

Maybe it's meant to be foreshadowing :-) :-)

                                           -Dave Dodge/dododge@wam.umd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Stelter)
Subject: Re: Dune, embarrassing?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 04:41:13 GMT
Keywords: n

zklf0b@gs144.uucp (Fergason) writes:


>In article <1992Sep3.034821.27452@cs.aukuni.ac.nz> mnor1@cs.aukuni.ac.nz (Mark Hiro           Norman         ) writes:
>>.
>>BTW what extended editions are you talking about? I've heard there was
>>a long mini-series size version put together, which Lynch disowned due
>>to its badness. Anything else? How does one find these editions
>>anyway? Might be worth a quick squiz.


>I was bored one Saturday, and Dune was on in the afternoon.  ALL afternoon.
>From about 11 am to 6 pm.  It wasn't all that bad.

Not all that bad?!  I've got six words for you: "The tooth...the tooth...
the tooth..."

:)

                                 --Steve Stelter
                                   sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: teshima@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (A. Lani Teshima)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: University of Hawaii
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 00:27:16 GMT

In article <jorngh.3@dhhalden.no> jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug31.215528.29891@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> mlh@eddy.austin.
>ibm.com (Mike Haskell) writes:>>
>>> What is the most embarassing movie you have ever seen?  (What I mean by
>>> embarassing, is that you feel absolutely miniscule when the lights come
>>> up and you HAVE to walk out of the theater with every other bonehead
>>> who bought a ticket to this turkey).  Movies on video don't count as
>>> your stupidity is hidden by the walls of your house. :-)
>
>Has anyone seen 'KISS Meets Phantom Of The Park' ? I mean, can a movie
>sink any deeper ? I saw this film in my teens when I kinda liked the
>groups music. GEEZ, I was ashamed when I left the theatre ...
>
>(looking back, I think the movie was so pathetic that it was _almost_
> funny.)

Yeah, it was pretty smelly. But as a loyal member of the Kiss Army at
the time, I _had_ to see it, you understand. However, I always thought
this was not a theatrical release, but something like a ABC Movie of
the Week. Was I incorrect?




--
A. Lani Teshima (teshima@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.edu)       o | /_/_/ "Sea Hare"
Student, UH School of Library & Information Studies     o|<0_0>--------*
A small mind is easily filled with faith.                 \=^-| |____| | 
Blessed is a mind too small for doubt.                        \_}B   \_}B
From: jjdti@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.D.Tilander)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Harrison Ford Question
Date: 15 Sep 92 23:48:51 GMT
Organization: Chevron

In article <195cbjINNgtm@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cb366@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark B. Bendiksen) writes:
>
>Loren Larsen writes:
>
>>Is Harrison Ford some sort of recluse?  I have never seen an interview with 
>>him or seen him in those pictures of the starts going to previews or parties.
>>Does he give interviews?  Am I just not looking in the right places?  All I
>>know about him is that he does great movies.  I can't think of a flop that
>he's
>>been in.                               
>                                                
>>Thanks,                             
>>Loren
>
>Mr. Ford does appear to be rather press-shy and private. He
>rarely does interviews, although I read a rather in-depth one
>about a year ago in one of those Sunday supplements that come
>with my newspaper (I believe it was _Parade_). He lives up
>in Montana (I think) with his wife and children. He is married
>to Melissa Matheson, one of the screenwriters for _E.T._, and
>she is his second wife.
>
>
>Mark B. Bendiksen
>cb366@freenet.cwru.edu
>-- 
>"If we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto,
> We'll just be bogus, too."-- Dr. Jeff Spicolli

One more thing...I'm pretty certain he owns a ranch near Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
I'm thinking I saw a recent interview in the newpaper as well.
-- 
Janet Tilander
Chevron Exploration and Production Services Co.
San Ramon, CA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Subject: Re: The Film with the fewest (> 0) actors
Organization: AT&T
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 10:05:00 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.113439.1@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu> bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole) writes:
>In article <zippy.716011448@berry.cs.brandeis.edu>, zippy@cs.brandeis.edu 
>(Patrick Tufts) writes:
>
>> Swimming to Cambodia and Monster in a Box.  Both are Spaulding Gray
>> monologues.  The first might be disqualified because it has a clip
>> from The Killing Fields, but I believe Monster has one and only one actor.
>
>And how many does _My Dinner With Andre_ have?
>
>(I'm beginning to think that the people posting to this thread don't really
>read this newsgroup...)

Based upon some followups I've seen, they may not get the newsgroup
at all.  Although they may read it.
>
>Greg Bole                               "Are you coming?  Yeah, well see the 
>bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu             train moves, not the platform."

Your .sig may sum up a potential response to those posters.

GMS
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: steinarb@idt.unit.no (Steinar Bang)
Subject: Re: Highlander III.
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Date: 8 Sep 92 11:21:13

>>>>> knude@daimi.aau.dk (Per Knudsgaard) writes:

>    MTV Europe's The Big Picture featured a short interview with
> Christofer Lambert about HIGHLANDER III. I tumbled into the
> interview towards the end(ZAP), so if there is anything wrong with
> the following - beyond the fact that they are making a followup to
> HIGHLANDER II, the sickening - I appologize.

They are making a followup to HIGHLANDER not H2 (*if* we are to
believe Christophe Lambert).

- Steinar
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies