HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: fred@cv.ruu.nl (Fred Appelman)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Dell SVR4 (and Dell hardware)
Date: 23 Aug 92 13:12:02 GMT
Organization: University of Utrecht, 3D Computer Vision Research Group

In <rvdp.714568017@yam.sow.econ.vu.nl> rvdp@sow.econ.vu.nl (Ronald van der Pol) writes:
>Dell SVR4 is probably the best Unix you can buy for a PC, but I think
>SunOS is a by far a more complete operating system.

I wonder what you mean with this statement. Can you give some examples of 
functionallity that is present in SunOS and not present in Dell SVR4. By far
sounds a bit strong doesn't it?

	Fred
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: jhpb@sarto.budd-lake.nj.us (Joseph H. Buehler)
Subject: setting UUCP g protocol parameters under ESIX SVR4.0.3
Organization: none
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 22:41:38 GMT

The protocol parameters for the UUCP g protocol under ESIX SVR4.0.3
can sort of be set using /usr/lib/uucp/Config.  The "sort of" is
because you can only set the window size, not the packet size.
There's a bug in uucico; if you change the packet size to be greater
than 64 bytes uucico gets all out of sync and that's the end of that.

To increase the g protocol window size, add something like this to
/usr/lib/uucp/Config:

Protocol=G(7,512)g(7,64)

(This example sets both the G and the g protocol.  G protocol is an
SVR4ism, I believe.)

In /usr/lib/uucp/Systems, add the protocols you want in the 3rd field
of the appropriate host entries:

somehost Any ACU,Gg etc....

The window should now be 7 on uucp g (or G) connects to "somehost".  I
used truss(1) on uucico to look at the protocol, and it does indeed
negotiate a window size of 7.

The throughput seems to have increased, as expected, though it's hard
to be sure -- the "error correction" light keeps flashing on my modem,
so I think I am getting some bad phone connections.

Too bad the packet size can't be set, that would probably provide a
more significant performance increase.
From: esr@snark.thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: FAQ maintainer needs some leverage on Dell
Date: 16 Aug 92 23:31:59 GMT
Distribution: world

In <1992Aug14.212539.24147@mole-end.matawan.nj.us> Mark Terribile wrote:
> It's true that Mr. Raymond seems to be in the business of selling
> things that people could get free, and of being given neat stuff
> for saying what he thinks.  But he seems to be successful, and to
> be having some fun besides.

No offense meant, Mr. Terribile, but I'm not aware that I'm selling anything
people could get for free.  Seems to me I'm giving away information that
you couldn't buy for any reasonable price before I started the Guides.  What
are you referring to?
 
> I for one am jealous of his business acumen.

To paraphrase Mae West, "business acumen ain't got *nothin'* to do with it".
I'm struggling pretty hard to meet the expenses created by all the time I've
spent on free software and net.projects.  If I were after the bucks, I could
be pulling down $80K per annum as a senior systems hacker somewhere.
-- 
					Eric S. Raymond <esr@snark.thyrsus.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: jhpb@sarto.budd-lake.nj.us (Joseph H. Buehler)
Subject: Re: Problem with lp on SVR4?
Organization: none
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 06:05:23 GMT

In article <1992Aug13.180606.23081@msc.cornell.edu> dchin@midas.msc.cornell.edu (David W. Chin) writes:

   Does anyone have this problem with lp that I have?  If I have more than one
   file in the queue, the first file gets printed out OK, but the rest come out
   as blank pages.  I'm running AT&T SVR4.0 on AT&T WGS 6386/25's.

I had a similar problem with a Postscript printer under ESIX SVR4.0.3.
It turned out to be the Postscript conversion software that lp uses.
The first file is interfering with the second file.  I put a
save/restore around jobs in my interface script, and that fixed it.
From: umisef@mcshh.Hanse.DE (Bernd Meyer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.xenix.misc,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Xenix (tm) emulation for Linux almost works :-)
Date: 16 Aug 92 23:14:26 GMT
Organization: Point of Presence & MCS Hamburg

keith@ksmith.uucp (Keith Smith) writes:

>In article <1992Aug6.053553.19637@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> lfoard@Turing.ORG (Lawrence C. Foard) writes:

>>
>>Any one want to write an MS Windows simulator :-)
>>-- 

>Hehehehe,

Well, guys, just a thought of mine - should be somhow more stable than an 
messy-dos emulation. MS-Windows-programs just have to use the system-calls.
No direct fussing around with VGA-cards, serial ports, printers and that 
stuff....
And wouldn't it be fun, just running MS-Winword withhout MS-Windows (Hehe,
Bill, here we smile :-)))

umisef
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: jhpb@sarto.budd-lake.nj.us (Joseph H. Buehler)
Subject: Re: UUCP disconnects on ESIX SVR4.0.3 using ZyXEL modem
Organization: none
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 21:46:44 GMT

In article <2561@news.cerf.net> jde@esix.everex.com (Jeff Ellis) writes:

   >I am having a problem with an ESIX SVR4.0.3/ZyXEL modem combination.
   >UUCP won't run more than about 15 to 20 minutes before it drops the
   >connection.  It does this with either inbound or outbound traffic.
   >I'm using the stock ESIX asy driver with a port locked at 38400.
   >
   >Does anyone have any ideas?

   If you are not using a 16550AFN UART chip you will have problems like this,
   at 9600 baud or above you will drop char's and get ALARMS with out the '550.

The chip is marked NS16550AFN.  It's a National Semi part, datecode
(?) B9136.  The serial card I am using with the ZyXEL was bought from
ZyXEL because it had this chip on it.

The error I almost always get is as shown in the following batch from yesterday:

ASSERT ERROR (uucico)  pid: 25253 (8/21-0:25:59) PKXSTART ret  (-1) [FILE: pk1.c, LINE: 384]
ASSERT ERROR (uucico)  pid: 25300 (8/21-0:48:18) PKXSTART ret  (-1) [FILE: pk1.c, LINE: 384]
ASSERT ERROR (uucico)  pid: 25340 (8/21-1:11:28) PKXSTART ret  (-1) [FILE: pk1.c, LINE: 384]
ASSERT ERROR (uucico)  pid: 25387 (8/21-1:52:21) PKXSTART ret  (-1) [FILE: pk1.c, LINE: 384]
ASSERT ERROR (uucico)  pid: 25412 (8/21-2:12:40) PKXSTART ret  (-1) [FILE: pk1.c, LINE: 384]
ASSERT ERROR (uucico)  pid: 25473 (8/21-2:59:18) PKXSTART ret  (-1) [FILE: pk1.c, LINE: 384]
ASSERT ERROR (uucico)  pid: 25501 (8/21-3:26:18) PKXSTART ret  (-1) [FILE: pk1.c, LINE: 384]

Would someone with access to the source mind telling me what pk1.c
line 384 thinks it is doing?

I am a bit surprised that UUCP abandons ship so easily.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: duffy@habenix (Ralf Bruening)
Subject: TGIF for ISC 2.0.2
Organization: Uni-GH Paderborn
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 14:35:02 GMT

Is there anyone out there who has succesfully ported the very famous
TGIF drawing utility to Interactive (2.0.2 or 3.0)?
Any ftp sites to get the binaries or the patches for ISC ?

I am using the X386 X-Server with X11R4.
Answers to the net or direct to me per eMail, on interest I will post a summary.

	Thanks in advance
		Ralf
--
duffy@cadlab.cadlab.de
==========================================================================
Ralf Bruening							Tel: +49-5251-284-235
CADLAB                          		Fax: +49-5251-284-140
Bahnhofstrasse 32                   	email: duffy@cadlab.cadlab.de
D-4790 Paderborn
==========================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: danh@quantum.on.ca (Dan Hildebrand)
Subject: Re: Dell SVR4 (and Dell hardware)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 92 15:39:45 GMT
Organization: Quantum Software Systems

In article <1992Aug18.174616.26174@portal.hq.videocart.com> kdenning@portal.hq.videocart.com (Karl Denninger) writes:
>
>However, the Sparc can eat the Intel machine's lunch on Ethernet.  It is 
>unfortunate that no one makes "real" Ethernet adapters for ISA-bus machines 
>(except RACAL, and there aren't any drivers for those available for SVR4 
>Unices).  The new DELL release is significantly better than before (about 
>1/2 the Sparc's speed on Ethernet) but they still have a good way to go here.

Actually, you don't need a bus-mastering Ethernet card to be able to drive 
an Ethernet at full bandwidth.  A good driver on a WD8013 is fully capable 
of it, provided the context switch and interrupt latencies of the 
underlying OS can meet the tight timing windows. After that, it becomes a 
question of whether or not the network protocol leaves enough cycles for 
the driver to run.


Dan Hildebrand                     email: danh@quantum.on.ca
Quantum Software Systems, Ltd.     QUICS: danh     (613) 591-0934 (data)
(613) 591-0931 (voice)             mail:  175 Terrence Matthews          
(613) 591-3579 (fax)                      Kanata, Ontario, Canada K2M 1W8
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: jason@oaknet.chi.il.us (Jason Vanick)
Subject: X11R4 binaries on AT&T SVR3.2
Organization: OAKNET - public access unix
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 23:53:50 GMT

I am trying to get the X11R4 binaries to work on my 386 box that is
running AT&T System V release 3.2 version 2.1. If I run X, it gives
me the following error
$ X386
Creating TCP socket: No such file or directory
>- It then goes into some kinda graphics mode (can hear monitor re synch)
>- and then gives the following message
Memory fault - core dumped
$
Yes, X386 and X are both setuid to root, all the files are there, there
are virtual terminals available, vtlmgr is running, but the virtual terminal
stuff doesn't seem to matter one way or the other...
Has anybody gotten X386 to run on this box?  Or, can SVR3.2.2 even run X?
Any help would be appreciated...
- Jason
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason Vanick               | Operator of Oaknet - public access unix
jason@oaknet.chi.il.us     |         +1-708-425-8739 2400 Baud N 8 1 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: adb@geac.com (Anthony DeBoer)
Subject: Re: FAS 2.10 async driver, part 5/5
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 18:20:42 GMT
Organization: Geac Computer Corporation

In article <102.26574@incc.com> jerry@incc.com (Jerry Rocteur) writes:
> [ anti-source-posting flamage deleted ]
>
>I have to pay for my news, plus I have to pay for the US-Europe phone
>call and I am not impressed having to pay to get this crap.
>
>What is the ruling regarding posting large files like this?
>-- 
> __^__                                                              __^__
>( ___ )------------------------------------------------------------( ___ )
> | / | Jerry Rocteur                       Email: jerry@InCC.COM    | \ |
> | / |             Independent Computer Consultants                 | \ |
> |___|               Division de DELDRA s.p.r.l.                    |___|
>(_____)------------------------------------------------------------(_____)
>   ^                                                                  ^

The ruling is that your .signature should be no more than 4 lines long.
-- 
Anthony DeBoer       adb@geac.com | uunet!geac!adb | GEM: ANTHONY.DEBOER
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: mpalmer@encore.com (Mike Palmer)
Subject: 60nSec memory - Will 486/33 be faster?
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 21:09:02 GMT
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation

Will a 486/33 be faster with 60nSec memory over 70 or 80nSec memory, assuming
the data required is not in cache memory.

How does the CPU wait state tie into this?


Regards,
Mike palmer
Telephone: (305) 797-2326 (W)   (305) 7546-3146 (H)

Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: evan@telly.on.ca (Evan Leibovitch)
Subject: Re: SAS 2.0
Organization: Somewhere just far enough out of Toronto
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1992 03:00:18 GMT

In article <1992Aug19.195140.3310@sinkhole.unf.edu>
	shite@sinkhole.unf.edu (Stephen Hite) writes:

>In article <1992Aug16.084351.10145@Unibase.SK.CA>
	roe@Unibase.SK.CA (Roe Peterson) writes:

>>Regarding merge:  We are currently testing the VPIX code by hacking the
>>ESIX 5.3 release into 5.4.0.3.A.  There is (to my knowledge) currently
>>no support whatever for native dos mode in ESIX 5.4, and I certainly don't
>>have access to dos/merge;  therefore, any extensions that merge requires
>>(if any) will have to be left as an exercise for someone else.
>
>  My experience with Esix 5.4 and VPIX 1.02 from Interactive is that
>it works except you can't mount DOS partitions, access the serial port
>or access 1.44 meg floppies (I use mdir for this instead).   

After literally months of back-and-forths on it, Locus has finally
shipped a version of Merge that will run properly on ESIX 4.0.4. I
forgot the exact release number but ESIX tech support has it.

ESIX tells me the last release of Merge is the first one that did not
break on the torture test they had designed for it. However, it does not
appear that ESIX will be OEMing Merge, as they don't feel there's enough
call for DOS-under-UNIX anymore to justify the extra cost of bundling it.
The Merge available from any Locus dealer will now run on ESIX.

If you have ESIX and you feel it's important for them to OEM Merge,
now's the time to let them know it.

I have always personally hated what DOS-under-UNIX products do to the
system, the hoops they make it jump and the performnce hit they extract.
It seems like in a situation where running DOS software in a UNIX
environment is vital, an approach using Desqview/X (designating a
separate machine as a "DOS server", so to speak) would be far
preferable.

-- 
 Evan Leibovitch, Sound Software Ltd., located in beautiful Brampton, Ontario
         evan@telly.on.ca / uunet!utzoo!telly!evan / (416) 452-0504
    Was "Trouble" (from the Broadway Show, Music Man) the first rap song?
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.misc,connect.audit
From: object@ibmpcug.co.uk (Ken Tough)
Subject: Help - where can I get the lp-daemon for SCO-3.2v2?
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author
	alone and may not represent the views of the IBM PC User Group.
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 14:58:26 GMT


We have got SCO UNIX version 3.2v2 (on a '486 machine), along with
SCO TCP/IP 1.1.3 (runtime and development).  Unfortunately, none
of these included the lpd printer daemon which reads from the net
and spools.   Where can we get hold of this?  Can someone supply
some C program which we can port?  If this isn't included as 
standard, what did everyone else do?

(I know that TCP/IP 1.2.0 will include the daemon, but that won't
be available for a little while yet, and we would also have to 
upgrade our UNIX to run it.)

Thanks for any help,
Ken
From: grant@bluemoon.rn.com (Grant DeLorean)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Dell SVR4 (and Dell hardware)
Date: 16 Aug 92 16:08:41 GMT
Organization: Blue Moon

larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:

>> Betcha couldn't guess what I am now running (SPARC 2)... :-}  Want
>>to buy some ISC UNIX?

>Don't be so quick to judge Intel based UNIX.  With the proper hardware
>and OS an Intel machine could out do your Sparc.

 Maybe when the 586 hits in EISA configurations. A 486DX-50
with EISA won't touch it now, even if the benchmarks say it will.
In a quickie test, where both systems were running the same rendering
software on the same image data the SPARC finished in 2.5 hours
what the 486DX-50 took 36.5 hours to do. The benchmarks said the 486
should have won by a few minutes, but it lost by a day and a half...
The 486 was running ISC so it wasn't that it was handicapped by SCO.

 And I still want to sell my ISC UNIX...
-- 
\   Grant DeLorean  - IHMSA & NRA Life Member -  (grant@bluemoon.rn.com)   /

        Tested on dolphins and assorted helpless furry creatures
From: ayr@gtech.com (Aleksey Y. Romanov)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: SVR4 tar
Date: 19 Aug 92 15:21:18 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: GTECH Corporation, West Greenwich RI



Hi,

I found some troubles  reading on SVR3.2 computer  tar archives created
on SVR4 machine. It seems to that format is slightly different on the SVR4.


I will appreciate any help



Aleksey Y. Romanov

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are entirely my own and do not
necessary reflect those of my employer or anyone else



-- 
Aleksey Y. Romanov

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are entirely my own and do not
necessary reflect those of my employer or anyone else
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: SLIP on ISC Vesrion 3.0
Organization: The Gator Public Access Unix Site - 219-289-3745
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 13:46:40 GMT

andrewl@hades.ausonics.oz.au (Andrew J Lockwood) writes:

>If there are so many different varients of SLIP implementations, could
>it be possible that there is also a PD version around which can be
>used with ISC SysVr3.2? Can enyone point me to such a beast if it

When we were running ISC 3.2 we used the SLIP which came with ISC

it worked fine -- without problems here for about 12 months before
we installed Dell SVR4

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
Gator Communications                              uucp: ..!uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: lunde@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de (Lars Grupe)
Subject: Re: X11 on SCO
Organization: Techn. University of Berlin, Germany
Distribution: fb20
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 13:39:55 GMT

mfq@world.std.com (Michael F Quigley) writes:

>Please excuse me if this turns out to be a very simple minded question. What
>I am wondering is if it is possible to run X11 on my system. What I am running
>is SCO Unix 3.2v2.0 with the development system. I don't have the TCP/IP
>networking system for it however. Is it possible to run X11 without the
>TCP/IP stuff? Upgrading to a V.4 or something is out of the question.
>
>							- Mike -

It is possible to run X11 on SCO3.2.2, but it impossible to run it without
both the TCP/IP-Runtime *and* TCP/IP-Development-System.
The X11-Port doesn't seem to be very complete. I had (and still have) lots
of problems concerning compilation of the MIT-X11R5-Release and User
Contibuted Software.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Lars Grupe UID lunde                                  <lunde@cs.tu-berlin.de>
 Technische Universitaet Berlin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: bmyers@shyguy.lonestar.org (bob myers)
Subject: Additional info needed -Sas!
Organization: 3-B Technology
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 04:02:56 GMT

I've just got the msg about having to do the /etc/conf/bin/idbuild,
as part of the "make install" for sas 1.25.

Now...How in the world do I turn off asy?

I've tried editing some of the files in /etc/conf/rc.d, but don't seem
to know what all to do to avoid seeing either messages about asy still
being there and conflicting with sas, or that asy is missing from the 
mdevice file.

thanks for all help...




-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Myers (3-B Technology)         |  As the story goes...
2479 Deer Run #1305                |   "A deranged mind is a terrible thing
Lewisville, Tx.  75067             |      to waste..."
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: rock@rancho.uucp (Rock Kent)
Subject: Re: FAS 2.10 async driver, part 5/5
Followup-To: comp.unix.sysv386
Organization: Del Rayo Ranch, San Diego, CA
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 05:19:03 GMT

On 17 Aug 92 18:25:09 GMT, jerry@incc.com (Jerry Rocteur) said:
Jerry> Who is the irresponsible bastard who posts large files in a non
Jerry> source newsgroup.  I have to pay for my news, plus I have to
Jerry> pay for the US-Europe phone call and I am not impressed having
Jerry> to pay to get this crap.

Uwe Doering authored and posted it.  I appreciate it -- I guess
irresponsibility (and crap) is in the eyes of the beholder.  I also
pay for my news and Uwe's work is worth far more to me than most of
the articles I see.

Many, many of us running V.[3,4] on 386 & 486 machines use his async
drivers.  I would guess that cross-posting the source in
comp.unix.sysv386 ends up being only slightly more expensive than
paying for all of the "I missed FAS2.10, could someone post it or send
me a copy" messages.  We'll have to wait and see whether the followup
traffic to your posting costs us even more.

Jerry> What is the ruling regarding posting large files like this?

Who are you asking?  Who do you think is in a position to do anything?

BTW, why do you get postings from Germany via uunet?

*****************************************************************************
*Rock Kent ||  rock@rancho.uucp || 14103 Kelowna Ln, Valley Center, CA 92082*
*****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
From: ovhe@ki.icl.se (Ove Hedin)
Subject: NeWS for Consensys SVR4 , where to buy it !!!
Organization: ICL Data AB, Sweden
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 13:40:10 GMT

Hi , i guess the title says it all. I'm interested in buying NeWS for
SVR4/386 as cheap as possible !!!

ovhe@sw2020.ki.icl.se
--
-- * All opinions and questions are my own -----------------------------------
Ove Hedin  Phone +46 (0)31499376 , DOMAIN Address : ovhe@ki.icl.se
X400: I=O ; S=Hedin ; OU1=SWE4701 ; O=ICL Data ; P=ICL ; A=TEDE ; C=SE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: fred@cdin-1.compu.com (Fred Rump)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Questions about MAS90 from SOA
Date: 21 Aug 92 19:21:44 GMT
Organization: CompuData

mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes:

>Although it is possible to fix most of these problems (I haven't yet
>found a fix for (4) above, but have gotten the rest of them mostly
>solved), I'm still left with a very bad feeling about MAS90.  It
>honestly looks like the BBx and SOA folks just took their DOS product
>and recompiled it under Unix, without any thoughts to the differences
>in paradigm between DOS and Unix.

   We use and sell SOA. While no software is perfect for everyone's taste, 
   this particular set comes pretty close in making users happy. As Marc has 
   suggested, there are some quirks which can be worked around. Onre thing 
   is certainly not the case and that is that DOS preceeded a UNIX version 
   thereof. 
   
   State of the Art software and BBx (Business Basic) go back many years to 
   the old mini days when appropriataryness was in vogue and UNIX existed 
   mainly for students. 
   
   Fred
-- 
Fred Rump        |  "For the things we have to learn before we can do them,
CompuData, Inc.    |   we learn by doing them."    		Aristotle
10501 Drummond Rd.   |	        	SCO Advanced Product Center
Philadelphia, Pa. 19154|   Internet: fred@COMPU.COM         (215-824-3000)
Xref: sparky comp.unix.sysv386:13219 biz.sco.general:2960
From: fengstad@alpha.uleth.ca (Grant Fengstad)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,biz.sco.general
Subject: IDA Sendmail for SCO Unix (binaries/build kit)
Date: 16 Aug 92 21:05:45 GMT
Organization: University of Lethbridge

G'day all....

I'm attempting ;-) to get the SCO sendmail distribution to do a variety
of things and have come to the conclusion that I would rather have the
IDA distribution of sendmail.  

I have sources, but at this point without the Development kit for SCO,
they really don't do much for me.  Someone out there must have gone
through all of this before and would be kind enough to provide a
'binary' distribution of sendmail-IDA for SCO Unix 3.2.2 or 3.2.4. with
the appropriate docs...

I appreciate any help/responses that you may be able to provide...

Please respond via Email...  thanks.

--
#====================================================================#
# Grant M. Fengstad		     E Mail: fengstad@alpha.Uleth.CA #
# Manager, Network Operations	     Voice:     (403) 382-6724       #
# Canadian Regional Airlines Ltd.    FAX:	(403) 327-1229       #
#====================================================================#
Xref: sparky comp.unix.sysv386:13089 comp.sys.intel:1484 news.answers:2474