HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: shrum@eos.arc.nasa.gov (Rick Shrum)
Subject: Re: QL: ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Organization: NASA Ames Res. Ctr, Calif.
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 21:42:23 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.124150.1433@oz.plymouth.edu> patstew@oz.plymouth.edu (Pat Steward) writes:
>In article <1992Sep29.203036.10157@eos.arc.nasa.gov> shrum@eos.arc.nasa.gov (Rick Shrum) writes:
>>In article <1992Sep29.124535.2975@oz.plymouth.edu> patstew@oz.plymouth.edu (Pat Steward) writes:
>>>
>>>Learn to use your KILL file, bud.
>>
>>Maybe Gary, like myself doesn't *mind* reading about QL, but Jeez-o-Pete,
>>*hundreds* of articles daily on the LHO episode??!!!
>>Besides, once you kill an article, some dork will always subtly change
>>the subject line so the next one will "sneak through".
>
>At the risk of repeating myself, you should check on your KILL file's
>abilities, too.  Although not ALL have the capability, many allow you
>to specify the *first few characters* of a subject line, such as "QL".
>Then all QL posts would be killed, regardless of the rest of the
>subject.
>
>Have a day.


U-2.

Actually, like I said, I *don't* mind reading about QL. I think the show
is ok. But sooo many posts? I mean, I like ice cream too, but I don't
think I want to sit down and eat 100 gallons of the stuff.



>-- 

                            R ****
                             I
                              C
                          **** K
From: whelan@sbphy.physics.ucsb.edu (John T. whelan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: QL: LHO--Oh, Brother! (SPOILERS)
Date: 27 Sep 92 00:38:56 GMT

ar710@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (William G. Martin) writes:

>In a previous article, runyan@cup.hp.com (Mark Runyan) says:
>>If there were a point, it was that he was to save Jackie's life and
>>(as Al said) once Oswald leaped back in, the Secret Service guy was
>>the only one left for him.

>That ending was lame, weak, and ridiculous. Up to those final couple
>minutes, this was a great and enjoyable QL. That idiotic twist at the
>end spoiled it. 

	I thought it was clever, but I would have appreciated more
hidden clues.  (The only one I saw was Oswald's "better half" asking
what color dress Jackie was wearing.)  (Quick continuity check: has
Jackie Onassis ever been mentioned in any post-1963 sequence of and
episode?)
	My initial reaction was to ask why Sam would have been sent to
save JKO rather than JFK, but it really does make sense if you think
about other episodes.  Sam often saves people who aren't as
"important"; his job is to "change history for the better", one
person's life at a time.  The scenes of Jackie with the children drove
that home for me: how much harder would the loss of their father have
been without their mother around?
					John Whelan
--
	"Do you know what Freud said about dreams of flying?
	 It means you're really dreaming about having sex."
	"Indeed?  Tell me then, what does it mean when
	 you dream about having sex?"  -- Sandman #15
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu
Subject: Re: Tawny replaces Arlene?
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 23:34:53 GMT

In article <1992Sep24.141907.4555@cbnewsh.cb.att.com>, jch@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (jeffrey.c.halle) writes:
> From article <19qhvqINN6g6@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, by ar710@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (William G. Martin):
>> Main complaint: Tawny was wearing far too many clothes! Based on her publicity>> shots and her WKRP appearances, I expected that she'd be wearing far more
>> revaling outfits than Arlene, and have more to display therein... Very
>> disappointing to see how covered up she was. Aftr all, one doesn't 
>> watch that show to see the homemade videos, does one? :-) :-)
> 
> For a better view of her, see Cocoon.  Or her Mom's movies.
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Whoever posted this is confusing Tahnee Welch (Raquel's daughter)
with Tawny Kitaen.  They are NOT the same person, unless Tahnee
has had some MAJORLY BAD plastic surgery.  Tahnee is much more 
attractive than Tawny!  Of course, what do I know, I'm a straight
female.  Guys?  Gays?  Any opinions?

Kellie M-S
internet::matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu
internet::matthews_k@cubldr.colorado.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: hunter@cs.cornell.edu (Scott B. Hunter)
Subject: Re: ARRRGGHH! "Sky fits heaven..." GO AWAY!
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 21:09:07 GMT

In article <69371@hydra.gatech.EDU> cegtitd@prism.gatech.EDU (Tim Dodd) writes:
>In article <1992Sep29.194152.16742@galileo.cc.rochester.edu+ hfir_cif@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Hoss 'macromolecular' Firooznia) writes:
>
>[ stuff about stupid GAP jeans commercial deleted ]
>
>+Yeah, every time I see that pretentious bastard I feel like choking him. >:-)
>+Anyone seen that stupid Levi's ad?  You know, the one where hordes of doofy
>+looking men are running around on the beach, playing with big bed linens or
>+some such, while ominous music drones in the background, and such profound
>+messages as "Everything basic... EVOLVES" flash up on the screen?
>
>Speaking of profound messages in advertising, my all-time favorite is an
>old Monsanto line:  "Without chemicals, life itself would be impossible."
>Thank you Monsanto!
>

I can go one better:

"'Have you driven a Ford lately?' It's not just a question; it's an
answer."

Come again?

scott


-- 
"He felt a rising, choking sense of worship and recognized it for what
it has always been for mankind -- self-respect."  
_More_Than_Human_, by Theodore Sturgeon
From: kapa@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (k.a.perkins)
Subject: Re: PICKET FENCES - ugh
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 03:25:17 GMT
Summary:  but I still like it

In article <Bv61zL.6nE@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charles Blair) writes:
> Cheesy David Lynch imitation.

yeah, maybe, but I still kind of like it.  I think I like Tom Skerrit and
the doctor character, and I probably really just like the idea of a tv
show set in a small town in Wisconsin.

Since I came from a small town in Wisconsin, I would make the following
observation, which is that murder is a very rare crime in such towns.
In about 15 years of calling that town (Merrrill, WI) my home, only 2
murders occurred, both by the same person.  They were big news.  I have
been gone from there for about 14 years, but my parents still live ther,
and I can only think of about 4 or 5 more that have occurred.  My
husband is from a slightly larger town in Wisconsin, and the number
of murders there is about the same.  If these folks have a murder story
every week, or even every other week, by about mid-season, you could
reasonably expect to see someone from a large city paper (Milwaukee,
Madison) or even a nationwide news magazine (Time, Newsweek, or certainly
People) there covering their crime wave.

Every show there's a scene or two that I really like, like the dueling
horns between the dad and one of the boys, or when the daughter said
that her idea of safe sex meant not telling her parents about what she
was doing!

Kate Perkins
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: cb366@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark B. Bendiksen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Sinead on SNL (was Re: Saturday Night Live's 18th Season)
Date: 6 Oct 1992 13:49:06 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


dhosek@hmcvax.claremont.edu writes:

>In article <1992Oct5.235356.7633@eos.arc.nasa.gov>, shrum@eos.arc.nasa.gov
(Ric:
>> In a follow-up to my own post, did anyone catch Sinead this past weekend
>> on SNL (10-3)? On her second song (if you could call it that) at the end
>> she said something like "this is the real enemy", showed a picture od the
>> Pope, and tore it up. The audience seemed stunned. No applause, no boos.
>> I'm not Catholic, but I thought what she did was pretty lame. Maybe her 
>> hair is growing *inwards*. Ol' Blue Eyes is gonna kick her ass for sure
>> *this* time!                    
>                                                  
>I missed the original, but caught the replay on the news today.
>When I saw the clip, I thought that maybe there was something
>more to it that they didn't include. I guess not. As a Catholic, 
>I'm one of the first to admit that the church isn't perfect, but
>this isn't dialogue: it's akin to painting a swastika on the
>wall.           
>                
>-dh 

I taped SNL and watched it the following day. After rewinding
the last few seconds of O'Connor's so-called "musical
number" several times I came to the following conclusion.

1. Ms. O'Connor has proven once again that she is
   an expert at pointing out what she sees as wrong
   with our society, without providing any suggestions
   for solving these problems, much less putting these
   solutions into action herself. If her song had given
   any insight into why she ripped up the picture
   of the Pope, perhaps I could forgive it. As it stands,
   it is a pointless act generated solely to shock and to offend.

2. The lack of applause at the end ot her act was most
   likely due to two reasons. First, the stunned
   audience wa in too much shock to respond. Second,
   I suspect that Sinead requested that the applause
   sign not be lit up after the song. Just a guess...

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I have admired
much os O'Connor's early recordings and her unusual
vocal abilities, but she has no business being in
the spotlight anymore where she can intentionally
incite hatred and anger. Ironic, since she would
claim to be doing what she does for "peace".
What a joke. I sincerely hope that SNL increases
their spoofs and attacks on this creature
ten-fold. She deserves it more than anybody alive
I can think of.


Mark B. Bendiksen
cb366@freenet.cwru.edu
-- 
"If we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto,
 We'll just be bogus, too."-- Dr. Jeff Spicolli
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: lewis@linac.fnal.gov (June Cummins Lewis)
Subject: Re: SNL: October 3, Really Bad.
Organization: Fermilab, Batavia, IL
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 00:20:11 GMT

In article <LIGHTNIN.92Oct4182214@bernoulli.WPI.EDU> lightnin@bernoulli.WPI.EDU (Paraaaaaaaaade of Shoooooooooes) writes:
>>>>>> On Sun, 4 Oct 1992 08:19:02 GMT, EDIAS@deimos.ucc.umass.edu (EMILIANO A DIAS) said:
>
>EDIAS> In <1992Oct4.044927.10855@afterlife.ncsc.mil>
>EDIAS> acadams@afterlife.ncsc.mil writes:
>
>EDIAS>> Is it just me, or was the October 3 Saturday Night Live really,
>EDIAS>> really boring?
>EDIAS>> 
>EDIAS>> I mean, there was not one entertaining sketch in the entire 1 1/2 hours
>
>EDIAS> nope it wasn't you, it was the show it really bit!!!
>
>EDIAS> The show looked like it was put together in two hours, nothing
>EDIAS> was funny, everyone kept stumbling over their lines.
>
>EDIAS> The only highlight (or at least the highest lowlight) was
>EDIAS> "Cooking" with Dennis Miller.  It wasn't a very funny skit but
>EDIAS> Dana Carvey does an excellent Dennis Miller.
>
>EDIAS> two shows so far and both have sucked...		Tony Dias

This was the worst SNL I've seen in a long time, no doubt about it.  I
even turned it off in the middle to watch my tape of "Sisters"--now,
that's pretty sad. 

>The only "funny" moment was in the Update during James Spade's Hollywood
>report.  After being generally rude and insulting to all the stars, they 
>flash up a picture of James's picture, and he says "burning bridges."

Yeah, he was OK.  David Spade, I think is the name.  Just before the
show I was wondering why he was still on the cast, but it seems they
are finally using him.

What this show lacked was MIKE MYERS.  Where are you, Mike?  Come back
and save the show!

June
-- 
"Saying that men talk about baseball in	order to avoid talking about their
feelings is the same as saying that women talk about their feelings in order
to avoid talking about baseball."
			--Deborah Tannen, author of _You Just Don't Understand_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: shrum@eos.arc.nasa.gov (Rick Shrum)
Subject: Re: SNL:  Where was Mike Myers?
Organization: NASA Ames Res. Ctr, Calif.
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 20:32:58 GMT

In article <1992Sep29.124814.18832@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> kristyp@coos.dartmouth.edu (Kristy Patterson) writes:
>In article <MITCHELL.92Sep28192544@rose.uchicago.edu> mitchell@cs.uchicago.edu writes:
>>>>>>> "PC" == APUCORLE  <APUCORLE@IDBSU.IDBSU.EDU> writes:
>>
>>  PC> Where was Mike Myers on the SNL premiere?  I kept waiting for
>>  PC> him to appear.  He and Dana Carvey are the only reasons to watch
>>  PC> these days.
>
>>Was he Sung Yi in the opening Woody Allen sketch?
>
>No, that was Rob Schneider (copy-machine guy). He seems to be on more
>and more... I didn't see Mike Myers at all, not even in the credits.
>
>-Kristy


A couple weeks ago I heard he was in the Bay Area (S.F.) making a film
(NOT a sequel to WW).


>-- 

                            R ****
                             I
                              C
                          **** K	

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: krin@wam.umd.edu (Karen E. King (Eglinton))
Subject: GI first episode
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 01:01:16 GMT
From: dkrause@miami.acs.uci.edu (Doug Krause)
Subject: YIJC:  Ending Credits
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 30 Sep 92 08:53:51 GMT
Distribution: na


I noticed that at the end of the last two "Young Indiana Jones Chronicles"
(9/21 and 9/28) that there were no voice overs during the credits.  Could
George Lucas be telling ABC to leave his baby alone?  Go George!

Douglas Krause                      One yuppie can ruin your whole day.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
University of California, Irvine    Internet: dkrause@hydra.acs.uci.edu
Welcome to Irvine:  Yuppieland USA  BITNET: DJKrause@uci.edu
From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Mariel Hemmingway to appear nude on network TV
Date: 1 Oct 1992 10:00:25 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: gandalf.think.com

In article <1ackiqINNinm@iraul1.ira.uka.de> noah@ira.uka.de (Noah B. Coccaro) writes:
>Just heard on the news (AP) that Mariel Hemmingway will be appearing in 
>a nude scene (i believe as a nude model) in the network TV series Civil Wars.
>Commercial sponsors have previewed the episode and are have no complaints. 
>Could this signal a lightening up of American fear of the naked body??

Well, I've seen the episode, and there was more nudity in the "mooning"
episode of "St. Elsewhere".

-- 
Barry Margolin
System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com          {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
id <m0mbX6d-0000D5C@crash.cts.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 92 07: 38 PDT
	id <j427401@pro-amber.cts.com>; Sun,  4 Oct 92 07: 36 PDT
From: rsopicki@pro-amber.cts.com (Randy Sopicki)
Subject: Re: *** Episodes of "T. J. Hooker", "C.H.i.P's" wanted, will pay $$$ *
Organization: ProLine [pro-amber] -- Spring Valley, Ca
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 92 07:32:40 PDT

IMHO T.J. Hooker was a fairly well done member of the "action" genre. Chips
on the other hand degenerated into a ...oh...beefcake and beauty program.
It started out good but Ego Erik really wrecked the show.
From: rnlee@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Profess'nal Agitator)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Reasonable Doubts two-hour premiere
Date: 3 Oct 92 13:38:17 GMT
Article-I.D.: sdcc12.38929
Distribution: usa
Organization: MAWL - Mudd Alums Without Lives

OK, so Kay's dead, but what are the behind-the-scenes reasons?

Was there a contract dispute?  Was Nancy Everhard only slated for the
first season?  Did she leave voluntarily?  Or did she get screwed over
by the writers?

Usually, when a regular gets killed off, there's something more going
on.

Agitator
  #->

"A political deadend."                  Bruce Herschensohn for U.S. Senate!!!
    --Gore on the Vice Presidency when    Not the ten-year       //  The REAL
      asked about a Dukakis-Gore ticket   Congress insider      //   outsider
--------------- R E M E M B E R   B E I J I N G ------------\\ //------------
IBM PC - Who wants a politically correct computer?           \X/  Only AMIGA!
========================================== Bring Back the Caltech Cannon!! ==
Roderick Lee, HMC '91      "The Professional Agitator"      agitator@ucsd.edu
From: ericc@Apple.COM (Eric Castle)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Sci-Fi Channel-- Anyone got it yet?
Date: 30 Sep 92 18:36:18 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

In article <137313@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> ed@wente.llnl.gov (Ed Suranyi) writes:
>In article <19vmi4INN7jf@agate.berkeley.edu> peterme@ocf.berkeley.edu (Peter Merholz) writes:
>
>>Well, The Sci-Fi channel is up and running in the Bay Area.
>
>Not all of the Bay Area, just wherever you happen to live.  Viacom Dublin
>does not seem to be carrying it, at least not yet.
>
>Ed
>ed@wente.llnl.gov

Yep, here in Cupertino we have TCI Cablevision and we don't get it. I called 
them up and they said to send in a letter requesting it and then they might
consider it in the 1st quarter of next year. Apparently they only consider
adding new stations at this time. What GARBAGE. I want another choice for
a cable company -- unfortunatly there is none. AAARRRGGGHHHH!!!!!

Eric
From: eliz@WORLD.STD.COM (Elizabeth Lear Newman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: QL: the place to write and comment
Date: 6 Oct 92 18:53:38 GMT


I talked to people in the QL offices to put in my two cents about the
new theme, and they reminded me that they love to have *everything* in
writing.  Your letters *are* read, and they matter.

	Don Bellisario
	Quantum Leap
	100 Universal Plaza
	Building 426-C
	Universal City, CA  91608

						...eliz

   tongue - a variety of meat, rarely served because it clearly crosses
            the line between a cut of beef and a piece of dead cow.
                                                    (Bob Ekstrom, Pitt, MN)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: pwjarman@cc.utah.edu (PARRY W. JARMAN)
Subject: Re: NEXP on rec.arts.tv
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1  
Organization: University of Utah Computer Center
Date: 26 Sep 1992 21:37 MST  

In article <1992Sep15.131512.5241@gw.wmich.edu>, adamsf@gw.wmich.edu writes...
{In article <9209111456.AA02666@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>, APUCORLE@IDBSU.IDBSU.EDU writes:
{> 
{> So, how many Northern Exposure fans are left on rec.arts.tv?
{> 
{> Hopefully, there are enough of us who can't get alt groups
{> that we can carry on a small discussion during the upcoming
{> season.
{> 
{> Let me know you're there!
{> 
{ 
{I am here!!! Have a good story to tell about my daughter's and son-in-law's
{two day visit to Roslyn.  Will post it later....no time.  I check each day
{for NEXP postings.  {

HEY! I'm here too! I can get the alt groups, but they are BORING. I guess 
things are slow until we get the new season rolling.

I'm in search of NX episodes on video tape. Some of my best ones were zapped by 
my VCR. So someone out there must have some of them---write me at the above E-
Mail address if you can help out--

Heather Jarman 

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: jeffy@cray.com (Jeffrey Neau)
Subject: Re: What is the deal with that ANNOYING kid in the Britannica commercials?
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 28 Sep 92 08:22:59 CDT

In article <1992Sep25.081659.18327@cactus.org> rdd@cactus.org (Robert Dorsett) writes:
>I have been watching more late-night TV than is really healthy, and have
>seen more of that annoying Encyclopedia Britannica commercial than is
>really healthy.
>
>As I recall, they started up with that squeaky-voiced little brat around 1983.
>He looked like he was in his late 20's *then*.  
>
>Now, he's back.  He doesn't appear to have aged.  He must be in his late 
>30's/early 40's by now.  His voice still squeaks.  Surgical alteration?  
>Hormone treatments?  Inquiring minds want to know.
>
>He is one of the most annoying creatures I have ever seen.  The merest 
>sound of that scratchy, computer-enhanced voice sends me convulsively 
>grabbing for the remote's mute button.  He has done incredible damage to his 
>sponsor's reputation, in my eyes.  Britannica is now indelibly imprinted as 
>a cheap, sleazy, obnoxious, kid-oriented operation.  They have no better way 
>to spend their ad money than on crap like this?!  Oooh, it inspires SUCH 
>respect.
>
>There.  I feel much better, now.

If you look closely at the computer he uses, I think you'll see that it
is an Apple II+.  The commerical may be old...

Jeff
-- 
Jeffrey Neau - jeffy@redwood.cray.com
From: ahummel@ems.cdc.com (H. Austin Hummel)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: SHOGUN miniseries
Date: 30 Sep 92 17:11:45 GMT
Reply-To: you@ems.cdc.com
Organization: Empros Systems International, a division of CDC


 I am looking for the Shogun miniseries in VHE format 6 tapes as
orginally issued. ANy one have them??
Xref: sparky rec.arts.tv:18666 alt.tv.bh90210:179
From: ckile@andy.bgsu.edu (crystal kile)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,alt.tv.bh90210,alt.tv.90210
Subject: Re: Smoking
Summary: they do
Date: 28 Sep 92 00:41:46 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Distribution: na
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.


	Dunno about the oldster cast members, guys, but it is fairly common
knowledge that Tori, Shannen, Jason -n- Luke smoke.  
	The sad, uncommented on thing here is that the women indicated
in some interview I read that they smoke to control their appetites.
SD said that that is why she started smokin.  This is an all too common
scenario.
																									cgk
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: otg@csi.compuserve.com (Owen Gwilliam)
Subject: Looking for Bullwinkle episode guide
Organization: CompuServe Incorporated
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 17:21:42 GMT

Folks,
        I'm looking for a complete episode guide for Rocky & Bullwinkle. I've
got a list of the "Rocky & Bullwinkle" stories themselves, I'm looking for
lists of the "Fractured Fairy Tales", "Peabody & Sherman", etc. I've been
having trouble getting through to ftp.cs.montana.edu so I can't see if one's
there. Can anyone out there help?

        Thanks.

        -- Owen
-- 
Owen Gwilliam - otg@csi.compuserve.com .. or .. CompuServe: >CSI:OTG

"Oh ... I thought the 'G' was a middle initial."
        - Heard far more times than I can even begin to remember ...
From: nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: SNL BAD?????
Date: 5 Oct 92 14:59:37 GMT
Organization: HMS

In article <92278.153859MJL122@psuvm.psu.edu> MJL122@psuvm.psu.edu (Michael J. Ludwig) writes:
>I thought the 10/3/92 SNL was better than most.  Don't have the stomach for
>you another one.  Whetheror not one agrees with Sinead's politics, I applaud
>her for her stand.  Organized religion has been the cause of more death and
>destruction than I care to contemplate (The Crusades????).

Whatta dope-like thinking. In the '90's(That's 1990's not 1490's) more
people die of cancer and AIDS than crusifiction. I see no stand in
Sinead's moronic antics. I could also care less what Catholic Church stands
for. Neither of them,Pope or Sinead, have any effect on my life.
As far as I'm concerned she's a bitter chick with a bad haircut.
Sinead, I believe, is nothing but a greedy headcase who seeks attention
and whose career,whatever is left of it, is about to take a serious plunge
especially after this outburst on SNL. She's an asshole-like hypocrite
who has no problem cashing in her royalties in this country and then insults
believes or non-belives of the American public. I didn't hear of Sinead 's
contributions to hospice centers for the dying cancer or AIDS victims or
helping starving kids in Somalia,the victims of the Yugoslavian civil
war or the victims of Chernobyl nuclear disaster.

She sucks as a singer and as a human being. She's a fucking lying scumbag
whose working permit in the U.S should be taken away and she should never
be allowed back here again.

-Mark
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv