HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: vernard@solaria.gatech.edu (Vernard C. Martin)
Subject: Re: Spider-Man is joining the X-Men!!
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 14:19:26 GMT

In article <1992Sep10.033053.20794@njitgw.njit.edu> bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler) writes:
>You almost had me stumped on this one.  Almost.  But I know who you're
>talking about.  The formerly deceased (but not any more) Calvin Rankin,
>also known as the Mimic, right?

Hm. I don't have those issues featuring Calvin Rankin. If he wasn't a mutant
then how did he get his powers and what exactly were his powers. I always
thought that he was a mutant with the ability to copy (i.e. mimic) other
mutants powers in the immediate vicinity. I also thought that he was dead.
If someone can firmly clear this up, I would greatly appreciate it.

V
Vernard Martin (vernard@cc.gatech.edu) Georgia Tech College of Computing 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: MHANNINEN@finabo.abo.fi (Mika H{nninen Inf)
Subject: Re: (More) proof Cable is Nathan Summers (PLOT SPOILER)
Organization: Abo Akademi University, Finland
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 20:57:45 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.20

In <92256.093429MJR127@psuvm.psu.edu> mark writes:

>   Hmmmm.... Interesting theory.  Mr. Sinister IS appearing in the crossover.
>   But it does bring up a few more questions...
> 
>           1) Is Mr. Sinister immune to Havok's blasts too? (someone must know)
> 
>           2) Doesn't Sinister have psychic powers?  Didn't he bring some of
>              his people back from the dead once?  Where would Cable/Stryfe
>              get these powers from?
Nope. He cloned them.
> 
>           3) If it is Stryfe who shot Xavier (I think it is) he did it so
>              everyone would go after Cable.  But   he's Cable. Why would he
>              want the x-gangs to go after himself? ^^^^^^^^^^
Whether Cable and Stryfe are the same person or not is unresolved. If
the original posting is true (please be true*n!) then the nature of the 
question is almost philosophical.
> 
>           4) What ever happened to the Mr. Sinister plotline in X-Factor
>              this year?
Got resolved, with a very clear promise of Mr. Sinister's return.
> 
> 
>           Questions, questions......
> -------
> ========================================================================
>   Mark Rieker   MJR127@psuvm.psu.edu   Go Atlanta Braves!
>                                        1991 National League Champions!!
>   We are Penn State
> 
>  "Well, there's no use crying over spilled mitochodria" -Ren, Ren&Stimpy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: Scav's thoughts on various threads.
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 03:15:13 GMT

On X-Force on the run:  I'd like to see them head for the X-men with hat's
(gogles, feathers, whatever) in hand and reaffiliate with Xavier.  They'll 
get a new title called ohhh, New Mutants Reborn or something (NM 2 sounds silly)
 and they'll get Ann Nocienti to write it.(Claremont won't do it as long as 
Harris is around, and PAD's got too much other stuff to do) Ann does deep 
stories with alot of character work. I'd rejoice.

on U.X-Men:  I`d say most of the good points are do to the tight x-over
plot by Nicieza, Harris(you don't know how much it pains me to say something
nice about him) and maybe PAD(did he work on the overall story?).  As I said 
before, Lobdell was just going through the motions, as usaual.

SIDE POINT ON LOBDELL:  (this infor is from a friend, so take it as such)
	it was revealed at the atlanta con this summer the reason that Lobdell's
stories suck (besides lack of ability).  Apparantly he is not required by Marvel
to turn in stories containing Beginings, middles, or endings. Since it's not a
requirement, he doesn't do it.

On New Warriors: It has its moments.  I take it issue by issue.

On Doug-lock:  Claremont was planning something with the tm virus 
later on, then Simonson killed Doug (a move regretted by all involved).
If they do bring him back, I hope he joins Excalibur(since Kitty's there
and Alan Davis is there and Claremont may show up there) or X-Factor
(since Rahne's there and PAD's there) anyplace else he just get shot again
and we'd probably be glad for it.

BTW: Why did dark gambit try to go to louisiana, since Gambit was in new york?

-----SCAVENGER

-- 
KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai
From: dv52151@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Axly)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: New Warriors Discussion
Date: 6 Sep 92 16:39:00 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

marks@castle.ed.ac.uk (Mark Steyn) writes:

>>I am now back to not being all that impressed.  I don't like the changes that
>>have been made since issue #25.  For one thing, I don't think Fabian should
>>have gotten rid of Marvel Boy.  I was looking forward to seeing the
>>relationship between him and Firestar slowly deepen over time.  (BTW, does
>>anyone know if there are any plans to bring him back soon?)  

>From what I have seen of Fabian's work, he rarely does anything to the
>Warriors without a reason.  He also has a habit of setting up plots
>waaaaaay in advance.  I have little doubt that we will see a New and
>Improved Marvel Boy (Man?) eventually and further romance with FireStar.
>Incidentally what ever happened to the plans to change Firestars
>costume?  It desparately needs updating.

Maybe he could have Bush pardon Marvel Boy in a desperate attempt to 
get the Superhero vote?

Axly
From: x89celio@gw.wmich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Excal. #55 questions *SPOILERS*
Date: 9 Sep 92 10:08:26 EST
Organization: Western Michigan University

SPOILERS!!





Questions about the fanastic issue #55:

1. Didn't Jamie already know Kitty's "strings" were "slippery" from their
encounter during the Cross-time Caper?  Of course, if he forgot and was
surprised, that's probably why she was able to escape this time.

2. When was Dai's wife established as a clairvoyant?  I would think
Alistair would be the first one to sense trouble with his twin sister,
as was inferred during the 'Lightning Squad'/Nazi Excalibur issues (Nazi
Callisto and Moira surprise Alysande, and over in the other room Alistair
breaks off in the middle of a sentence and tells Dai his sister's in danger). 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: kogutt@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (SCAVENGER)
Subject: Re: Spider-Man is joining the X-Men!!
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 20:28:06 GMT

>>And what about Longshot?  He's an alien, not a mutant.
>
>Yes, Longshot is a mutant of his own race... one of the few with true free will!

Since Longshot is a geneticly engineered being, he can't be a mutant 'cause he
doesn't have parents to differ from.

>The same went for Warlock of the New Mutants, whose mutation allowed him to feel
>compassion where the rest of his race lacked that trait.
>
This was a stupid theory that Jo Duffy created for Fallen Angels.  
Someone decided that to be in an X-group you had to be a mutant so they 
explained Warlock that way.

-----SCAVENGER

THE CLAREMONT FILES ARE COMING



-- 
KAHN: And I never forget a face.  Mr. Chekov,   |  kogutt@ucsu.colorado.edu
           isn't it?                            |      (Internet/Usenet)
CHEKOV:  But, I wasn't in that episode!!!       | No matter where you go, there
     (from MST3K:The Wrath of Kahn)             |    you are."-Buckaroo Banzai 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: dv52151@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Axly)
Subject: Re: New X-Force and U.X-Men
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 16:10:17 GMT

daikerjohnc@bvc.edu writes:


>   Somehow Xavier brings Doug back to life as Douglock (I like to think
>Xavier's infected parts go wild, infecting anything near, i.e. the remaining 
>infection in Doug's body), as Cable PLANNED.  Thus Douglock is born, giving
>X-Force the muscle it needs to survive so Cable can leave, AFTER curing Xavier.
>The future must have a cure to the Transmode Virus.

Nice theory, except they already have all the muscle they need. The team is
full of some of the more powerful young characters in the Marvel Universe.
Warpath went head to head with Juggernaut and stayed with him for a while,
Cannonball is well nigh invulnerable when blasting (which explains the
outrageous chin they put on him sometimes), and the rest aren't exactly
slouches: Rictor, Feral, Shatterstar. Douglock would not be half so
welcome to me as that little girl with all the PowerPack powers from
the annual. She could be brought in without resurrecting Doug and 
Warlock, thus helping slow the Marvel RevolvingDoorO'Death (TM).

Axly
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: dani@netcom.com (Dani Zweig)
Subject: Excalibur #56
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 92 00:54:00 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

Excalibur continues to be a fun read.  While it's hardly sui generis,
as Gaiman's titles are, for instance, it continues to show how much
can be done *within* the confines of the sub-genre -- and how far most
of Marvel's titles fall short.

Kitty's hiding place was priceless.

I'll admit that I *could* have survived a few more pages without
being told that Psylocke's psychic knife was the focused totality
of her telepathic abilities...  (On the other hand, Davis gets
points for working Crocodile Dundee, Monty Python, *and* that chestnut
into a single frame.)

-----
Dani Zweig
dani@netcom.com

"One of my favorite games when I was a kid was 'murder/suicide.'
 Dad would show us a photo and ask us, "Is it a murder or a suicide?"
	  --  Colleen Doran

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: jrp3935@tamsun.tamu.edu (Jonny Ray Purvis)
Subject: Re: The new X-Force and U.X-Men
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 05:26:17 GMT

In article <1992Sep6.162711.12805@news.columbia.edu> jml12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Jonathan M Lennox) writes:

much snipped here

>  The one thing that might possibly be a sign of some development of
>these plotlines is that Cable/Stryfe's bullet in the most recent X-Men
>was, according to net.reports of preview information, carrying the
>transmode virus.  The only place on Earth to get the transmode virus
>would be from Warlock (unless, of course, he brought some with him
>from the future).

Maybe some is still hanging around from one of Magus's visits.  Or, alternately,maybe some of the Limbo demons that got it inficted someone / something when
they invaded Earth some time back.  Maybe Cable/Stryfe took some directly 
from a demon during during Inferno, and has been saving it all this time.

Jon Purvis
jrp3935@tamsun.tamu.edu
From: bxp1628@hertz.njit.edu (Brian Perler)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: cable/stryfe/mr.sinister
Date: 15 Sep 92 17:37:03 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Sep15.164302.2258@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer) writes:
>nova@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jennifer Baughman) writes:
>
>>Sure it's possible...  But theoretically, a clone of Cable would not have the
>>_exact_ same scar in the _exact_ same place with the _exact_ same cybernetics!
>>In theory, at least, if Stryfe were a clone of Cable, he would be a physically
>>perfect (unmarked by scars, cybernetics, etc.) copy.  Therefore, Stryfe is
>>_not_ a clone of Cable, or vice versa.  But I like the Cable/Stryfe/Mr. 
>>Sinister deal... But it'll never happen.
>
>If someone has the technology to clone an individual, it would *not* be 
>difficult to attach a few cybernetics and create scars in the right places.

Sure, but why would you want to?  Okay, I can see why the cybernetics
might be desired, but why only one eye and one arm?  And why the scars?
You could do it, but you would have no logical reason to do so.

-- 
"Dog bites man--that's not a story.  Man bites dog--*that's* a story.  And
if the dog and the man slug it out for six issues, and then Wolverine shows
up for a guest appearance, and the dog turns out to be a mutant, that's a
*Marvel* story!"			-Marvel Editorial Handbook
From: sl859@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Fwd: Rachel
Date: 9 Sep 92 00:54:43 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

> It was it that 
> transported that man with the (I don't know the word in English but in
> Italian is scolapasta) on his head                                     

Paolo,
	Credo che la parola che cerchi sia "Collander"!
        Ma, la parola che gli ignoranti usano la parola "Pasta Strainer" o
	qualcosa simile.  Mama Mia!  Non ho mai risposto in Italiano a 
	questa gruppa di news!  Comunque, tanti saluti agli Italiani!
	Mi manca il bel paese!

						wReam...
					    Ultimate Ninja!!

P.S.  Yes, that's RIGHT!  wReam does speak Italian! (sort of!)
       (Scusa i sbagli, per favore!)
> 			
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks,rec.arts.comics.misc
From: mcmahan@cs.unca.edu (Scott McMahan -- Genesis mailing list owner)
Subject: Re: What about the Avengers?
Organization: University of North Carolina at Asheville
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 21:22:43 GMT

Eric Zmarzly (eric.t.zmarzly.1@nd.edu) wrote:
: How come no one cares about the Avengers?  

Who said no one cared about the Avengers?

: Is the world corrupted with
: mutant-lovers?  

Yes.

:Is there any decency left in this world?

No.

: Please, anyone who loves the Avengers like I do, please write.  I would
: like to know that the world is truly good.

The Avengers aren't good anymore. Tom Palmer, the #1 Marvel (and probably
world) inker can't save it. 

Buscema (I mean John Buscema, not JR JR :)) and Palmer were *THE*
team. They ruled. I bought 2 New Mutants with Simonson just cos
they drew it. (Think fast! That was the ObX comment :))

After that, the pencil artists got worse and worse.

What does liking the avengers have to do with the world being good?

Scott

(I'll x-post this to r.a.c.m too :))

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Deus Imperator)
Subject: Re: (More) proof Cable is Nathan Summers (PLOT SPOILER)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 23:53:10 GMT

In article <1992Sep11.154556.15775@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> jwlr@dali.cc.rochester.edu (James Willer) writes:
>In <1992Sep11.143441.12912@access.usask.ca> donald@dvinci.USask.Ca (David Donald) writes:
>
>>mark rieker <MJR127@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>
>>But they're not all related, at least not by genetic means... Scott, Havok, 
>>Cable and Stryfe could be, if the latter two are actually Nathan Summers in 
>>one form or another, but Jean is merely Scott's intended... there's no genetic
>>connection there... So, am I confused, or missing something obvious??
>
>Nathan's mother (Madelyne sp?) was a clone of Jean. So she's as much of a
>genetic match as Scott, and more of one than Alex!
>
>					James Willer
Which now makes me state this theory...

Those loyal followers of X-Factor remember that Mr. Sinister did not allow 
good old Senator Whatshisface to cack Alex because of "family business."

SOOO...here we go...

Nathan (the kid) gets half of his body infused into Apocalypse's ship, and
the Askani warrior could only replace half the body.  Nathan, half mutant, 
half machine, saves the askani and gets for his trouble a base somewhere 
out of time to prevent the askani future from happening.  He also is given
the ol' time traveller.
	He appears as Cable, a mercenary that "everybody knows."  Well, no
continuity problems...with time travel, Cable can enter continuity at any
point, and be part of official marvel history.
	Anyway, Cable screws up, and fails to prevent the future.
	So he comes back, with all the knowledgte of his failures, and tries 
to do it again, this time as Stryfe.  He realizes that the Professor is too
weak, and must be taken out.  This we know.

Now onto the good stuff...

He fails one more time, and decides to go through, this time more evil than
ever before.  This time, he's tired of hiding his incredible powers and 
technology, and this time flaunts it.  He comes back as...

MR. SINISTER...

Now the interesting thing is that the evidence is there.  What was the 
one thing that could take sinister down?  Scott's optic blasts.  Alex is
immune because he's his brother, but what if that immunity skipped generations,
or even increased tenfold against Scott's offspring, the effects could be
devastating.
	So knowing that his father was the only one that could hurt him,
Mr. Sinister kidnapped Scott as an orphan, and moved to have him killed,
when he realized...he couldn't.  If he killed Scott, he (Nathan) would never
be born.  Further, he had to _ensure_ his own birth, by creating Madelyne.

TAADAA!

-- 
Thanatos, DeathUrge, Master of Everything But Love tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
"Oh God, does this mean we have to fight?"
			-Selina Kyle, _Batman_ 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: m23364@mwunix (James Meritt)
Subject: non-mutant X-Men (was Re: Spider-Man is joining the X-Men!!
Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean VA
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 20:27:13 GMT

In article <BuBnMs.3Mu@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> chak@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Matthew William Somers) writes:
}In article <1992Sep9.145520.10926@linus.mitre.org> m23364@mwunix (James Meritt) writes:
}>In article <1992Sep9.081154.1@woods.ulowell.edu> lombardif@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
}>}Yes, it's true!!! Spider-Man will soon be joining all the
}>}X-Groups as it is revealed that he IS, in fact, a Mutant.
}>
}>Why should this be a consideration?  They have had non-mutant members.
}>In fact, one of their field commanders in action has been a non mutant.
}
}The only non-mutant to be an X-Man was Mimic.

BINGO!  And he was a field commander/team leader.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: lombardif@woods.ulowell.edu
Subject: Hulk to Join the X-Men!!
Organization: University of Lowell
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 20:20:04 GMT

The title says it all, The Hulk is joining the X-Men.
It seems that Banner has the uncanny ability to gain vast strength
and invulnerability from a gamma bomb instead of dying ...

My original article was meant as a joke, I guess you ALL missed
it ( or it wasn't that funny ) but anyway
Most of the X-Men were mutants, that IS their claim to fame
So if we can't laugh at comic, what CAN we laugh at??

-The Viking
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: MHART00@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU (mason hart)
Subject: Re: Excalibur #56
Organization: Rice University  
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 03:56:38 GMT

In article <c8vn2hr.dani@netcom.com>
dani@netcom.com (Dani Zweig) writes:
 
>I'll admit that I *could* have survived a few more pages without
>being told that Psylocke's psychic knife was the focused totality
>of her telepathic abilities...  (On the other hand, Davis gets
>points for working Crocodile Dundee, Monty Python, *and* that chestnut
>into a single frame.)
 
Very true.
 
I can forgive the "focused totality" schtick in light of the
following line ("it cuts a lot deeper than your banana").
 
My only concern at the moment is: how long can Davis keep up
with a bi-weekly schedule?  I can't bear another return to
gimp art, and I still have nightmares about Lobdell's writing.
 
"If you're not having fun, you're doing something wrong."
-- mason hart, rice u.
From: tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Deus Imperator)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: Who was the Traitor?
Date: 15 Sep 92 20:12:09 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

In article <0ehVJx200WBNA46mMP@andrew.cmu.edu> "Michael J. Keating" <mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>Lets think about this for just a minute.  We've all been trying to
>figure out who it was that betrayed the team and killed professor X, and
>now the crossover goes and gives us an explanation and we ignore it. 
>Try to follow along.  First, we are given the hint that the assassin was
>Gambit.  Gambit has since become waaaaay to popular for the x-writers to
>lose as a team member, so they come up with an alternate traitor --
>Cable (who may or may not actually be Stryfe in disguise).  Remember --
>the costume Jean Grey was wearing when she made the recording about the
>betrayal (the tape that Bishop saw) was her current one. (With the
>current trend in comics fashion, that means that the betrayal had to
>occur in what would be our immediate future.)  Also, the blast that
>supposedly killed Jean on that tape was not indicative of Gambit's
>powers, but may have been a blast generated by such weaponry as
>Cable/Stryfe uses.
>There must be a real connection in there somewhere...  
>
In the issue in question, Jean States that she tried to put out a call to 
Cable and Alex (Havok), with no response.  She had already stated that it was
someone they trusted, indicating she knew who the attacker was at the time
of the attack.  Therefore, it being Cable is doubtful at best.
	And with the way Marvel cleans up their crossovers, this plot line
may be in danger.  Undoubtably, at the end of X-Cutioners Song, something
evilwickedmeanandnasty (TM) will happen to 1) Apocalypse (to knock him back
to the "figure brooding in the shadows" status) and 2) Cable and Stryfe 
(the moment Jean found out Rachel was her daughter in Excalibur, the Phoenix
spirited her away...Marvel _hates_ happy family scenes, so these two will
be presumed dead).  Since Cable is no longer head of X-Force, there really
would be no reason to call him in any event.  Personally, the whole thing
reeks of fallout from the Xodus, and will take some _major_ tapdancing to
resolve.  Any takers in the audience?
	_I_ was pretty damn sure it was Psylocke under Mojo's control.  It
makes perfect sense.  Longshot and Dazzler come back, screaming Mojo's 
coming.  When the X-men scream "Where?"  Both scream "Here!" and lay into them
Psylocke (still under Mojo's conditioning from WAAYYY back) takes out Professor
X and take over the heavy hitters.  Any one of these people, then could have
fired the shot that took out Jean.  And why did Gambit survive?  That "psychic"
invisibility they've all but forgotten, that allowed him to hide from the 
Shadow King AND on the Shi'ar ship.  But Fatboy's dead (snif!) so so much for
that one... 

-- 
Thanatos, DeathUrge, Master of Everything But Love tgt33358@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
"Oh God, does this mean we have to fight?"
			-Selina Kyle, _Batman_ 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: clark@netcom.com (Sue Clark)
Subject: Re: Fwd: Rachel
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 92 09:08:47 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

"Michael J. Keating" <mk56+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:


>What I mean is that the storyline was never resolved with respect to
>Wolverine and Rachel, or between Rachel and the rest of the team.  She
>just popped up in the annual a few years later and nothing was brought
>up about the events which led up to her leaving the team. 

I'd like to see that.  In fact, I'd like to see a true meeting of
Excalibur and the rest.  They're getting close, pulling in Prof and Jean
for one issue, and now Betsy showing up in the current set.  Still, you
never hear Wolvie or Storm or Peter wondering what's up w/Kurt or Kitty.
I think they might be just a little curious from time to time.

Sue

(Cable's in my X-man...I'm so depressed. :/)
-- 
-----------------
Sue Clark
clark@netcom.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
From: nova@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Jennifer Baughman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks
Subject: Re: (More) proof Cable is Nathan Summers (PLOT SPOILER)
Date: 15 Sep 92 03:33:11 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

Geez!!!  Why does everyone gang up on Peter David?????????  It's almost as bad
here as it is over on rec.arts.startrek.current!!!!!

__NOVA__
______________________________________________________________________________

"We ask the stars `Why?'
 We question our lot...
 The heavens open wide 
 And reply, `Why not?'"
	--Henry "Beast" McCoy
_______________________________________________________________________________
Newsgroups: rec.arts.comics.xbooks