HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Mon, 9 Nov 1992 09:11:52 EST
From:         RICHETIN@FRNSAE11.BITNET

======================================================================== 8

Hi,
apologies for my english.
my question is: could somebody told me is SAS could be run in AIX/ESA mode ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jean-Luc RICHETIN                                   TELEX INSEE 632 867
E.N.S.A.E.                                     FAX. (33)(1) 41 17 64 80
3 avenue Pierre Larousse                       TEL. (33)(1) 41 17 65 04
92241 Malakoff Cedex                        N BITNET RICHETIN@FRNSAE11
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: MICHAEL@PENNDRLS.UPENN.EDU (Michael W. Kearney)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Subject: Re: WDSF/VM
Date: 12 Nov 92 15:46:25 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <MICHAEL@PENNDRLS.UPENN.EDU>

It is possible to force the WDSF server to do a complete backup. There are at
 least
two ways I can think of. You could do it by doing a selective backup of all
the desired filesystems, since this makes a copy of the file regardless of
whether there's already an active copy there. The disadvantage of this approach
 is
that the include-exclude processing isn't done for selective backups and hence,
 you
may end up with file copies in the server you don't want.

An alternative approach would be to do two incremental backups. The first would
use an alternate INCLEXCL file list which excludes all files in the domain
being backed up. For example, the exclude statement:

EXCLUDE /.../*

would work. Running the first incremental backup with this in effect will
cause all files in the domain to be made inactive. Then, doing an
incremental backup with your regular INCLEXCL list in effect will send all
the desired files to the server again.

Regards,

Michael Kearney
From: scornd4@solomon.technet.sg (Joomeng Quek)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Subject: Re: choosing mount points, expanding files
Date: 5 Nov 92 05:57:03 GMT
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

: 1. We will be installing a number of third-party products. What is the most
:    sensible mount point? One of the products is INGRES database (100Mb). Our
:    machine will have about 1.8 gig when we finish. We are condidering /usr as
:    the mount point.

/usr may not be a good choice. When you need to upgrade or after some file
corruption, do a preservation install, the system may and will overwrite
/, /usr and /tmp.

: 2. /usr shows as 98% used. I am going to need to expand it soon. There does not
:    appear to be any on-the-fly way of doing so. Do I absolutely have to backup
:    /usr, delete it, recreate/re-size it, and restore it?

go into SMIT (smitty or SMIT -C in X) you will be able to increase the file
system on-the-fly. decrease is out.
From: DEBA@IBRDVM1.BITNET (Deba Patnaik)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Subject: Re: WDSF/VM
Date: 6 Nov 92 22:22:17 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
              6 Nov 1992 13:44:05 PT from <HW1.IIFURUNG@TS3.TEALE.CA.GOV>

We are using WDSF/VM on a production basis for AIX and SUN users. It also
supports OS/2, MAC and DOS. Everything works out great. Except DOS client,
which requires some extra care for memory management.

IBM has a replacement product for WDSF/VM, due early next year, called
DFDSM, which will support Windows and Novell.

DEBA PATNAIK
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Wed, 11 Nov 1992 08:47:08 -0500
From:         "Rob McAteer" <rob@CSI.ON.CA>
Subject:      Re: imake
              Nov 10, 92 3:23 pm

>
> I am still struggling with imake and am obviously missing the boat here
> somewhere. After building X11/Xamples the template and config files are
> there. The make install did not move them anywhere so I assume they should
> stay in the /usr/lpp/X11/Xamples/bin directory. That being the case I expected
> imake to know where to look for them but that is apparently not the case.
> They exist but imake seems to be looking somewhere other than /usr/lpp/X11/
> Xamples/bin. Do I have to manually move them to /usr/include? If so
> what files have to be there? If I don't have to move them how do I tell imake
> where to look? Is there an environment variable I have to set?
Now that the /usr/lpp/X11 tree has been built, I suggest you read
/usr/lpp/X11/Xamples/config/README - the Imake Configuration Guide.
This explains how imake is run and how the path to the config files can
be given in the command line.
For example, when in a directory with an Imakefile, the command
        imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/lpp/X11/Xamples/config
will usually produce a Makefile. Plain make is then used to build your
client.
--
Rob McAteer                                   CAnet: rob@csi.on.ca
Carp Systems International                    Voice: (613) 592-5780
600 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 200                  Fax: (613) 592-0584
Kanata, Ontario, Canada     K2L 4B6
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
From: merrick@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Tom Merrick)
Subject: Re: Imake
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 16:02:30 GMT

In article <9211051449.AA26231@asnsvr.asn.net> Dennis Putnam <dap@ASNSVR.ASN.NET> writes:
>My thanks to all those that responded to my request about Imake. Unfortunately
>I have only the AIX 3.2 distribution and it is not in that apparently. I'll
>have to down load the MIT distribution. Anybody know why IBM took it out?

imake is located in /usr/lpp/X11/Xamples/config under aix 3.2.2.

>
>Since that question was too easy here's one that might be more of a challange.
>Is there a tape dump utility for AIX that will read any tape and report
>its characteristics (e.g. recfm, blksize, lrecl, etc.)? Something like
>DITTO for VM would be especially nice.

tcopy with only one device will list out the blksize and number of blocks
for each file on the tape.  This will not give you contents (eg like tar 
files), but will give you an idea what is on the tape.
>
>
>Dennis Putnam				Alabama Supercomputer Network
>Service Manager				dap@asnsvr.asn.net
>Boeing Computer Services		(205) 971-7429

Tom Merrick
Ohio State University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Wed, 4 Nov 1992 17:28:01 -0500
From:         Mike McGlone <mmcglone@MGH.COM>
Subject:      mail facility

Hello,
We currently have a R6000 model 340, and are using the mail utility which
came with the BOS. My user community is objecting to using the vi editor
for making corrections. Currently all the users are using character terminals
Could anyone suggest a mail facility which uses a wordprocessor style of
editor, that still works over the internet.
From: scornd4@solomon.technet.sg (Joomeng Quek)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Subject: Re: Freezing up problems!
Date: 5 Nov 92 05:45:38 GMT
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

I've has some freezing up problems too.    

In my case, they were fatal. I found the /usr partition corrupted. fsck
wasn't a help. The corruption got so bad, I couldn't even do a preservation
install. Had to start from scratch. Its a new system without a proper
backup. 

I believe certain blocks couldn't be read. The system will freeze when an
i/o addresses the "can't be read" blocks.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Via:         UK.AC.BRIS;  5 NOV 92  9:58:49 GMT
X-Mailer:    ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Thu, 5 Nov 1992 09:56:41 GMT
Reply-To:     Steff.Watkins@bristol.ac.uk
From:         EthaStorm <Steff.Watkins@BRISTOL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Please de-register me!!!!

Please de-register me from this list.


      Steff.Watkins@bristol.ac.uk
      ccsw@np1a.bristol.ac.uk

Thanks!!!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Thu, 5 Nov 1992 16:29:47 MEZ
From:         Klaus Kretschel <RZ13@DLRVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Imake
              5 Nov 1992 08:49:17 -0600 from <dap@ASNSVR.ASN.NET>

On Thu, 5 Nov 1992 08:49:17 -0600 Dennis Putnam said:
>
>My thanks to all those that responded to my request about Imake. Unfortunately
>I have only the AIX 3.2 distribution and it is not in that apparently. I'll
>have to down load the MIT distribution. Anybody know why IBM took it out?

This is not quite right. When you build the X11/Xamples, imake is being
built too.

Klaus Kretschel
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Fri, 6 Nov 1992 13:49:29 MET
From:         Pierre Larrieu <LARRIEU@FRCPN11.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: TeX 3.141

Pardon ? de quoi s'agit - il ?
Merci

   Pierre Larrieu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Thu, 12 Nov 1992 09:21:00 EST
From:         XHIDALGO@ECUAFUN.BITNET
Subject:      HELP NAMED

Hi Folks.

I work in ECUANET (Corporacion Ecuatoriana de Informacion) Quito-Ecuador,
we have a machine IBM RISC 320H with a O.S. 3.2.1. UUNET is trying to
tranfer the ec (157.100.45.2) zone to us. We are the primari name server
for this zone in Ecuador, but they (UUNET postmaster@uunet.uu.net) have
the following problem:

Looks like there's something wrong with the ec zone file over
there.  Zone tranfers from here are failing.  Here's the
debugging output from named-xfer:

--------- start debugging output
domain `ec.' file `domain/bak/ec' ser no 1
zone found (2): 'ec.', source = domain/bak/ec
 (addrcnt) = 1
getzone() ec.
connecting to server #1 157.100.45.2, 53
len = 71
HEADER:
        opcode = QUERY, id = 1, rcode = NOERROR
        header flags:  qr ra
        qdcount = 1, ancount = 1, nscount = 1, arcount = 0

QUESTIONS:
        ec, type = SOA, class = IN

ANSWERS:
        ec
        type = SOA, class = IN, ttl = 2 days, dlen = 39
        origin = ecnet.ec
        mail addr = xbaquero.ecnet.ec
        serial = 920912
        refresh = 5 days
        retry = 1 hour
        expire = 10 days
        min = 2 days

NAME SERVERS:
        .
        type = 0, class = 0, ttl = 0 secs, dlen = 0
        ???

bad response to SOA query from 157.100.45.2, zone ec.: rcode 0, aa 0,
ancount 1, aucount 1
--------- end debugging output

In other mails they told me that the TTL in the field minimun of the SOA
have 0 but I have a TTL 172800, besides the other records should take the
TTL from the  SOA, but they told me that those fields have 0, then  I
typed the TTL 172800 for each record.(Address, PTR, etc)


Please If you are Primary Name Server in your zone, What should  I do?
What version of Operating System  Do you have?
Please your comments and sorry to bother you.

Thanks
Javier Hidalgo             jhidalgo@ecnet.ec
                           xhidalgo@ecuafun.bitnet
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Universite de Bourgogne, Centre de Calcul, France
X-Acknowledge-To: <BASAILLE@FRCCUB11>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Mon, 9 Nov 1992 12:10:07 EST
From:         Jean Christophe Basaille <BASAILLE@FRCCUB11.BITNET>
Subject:      Fortran 90

Hi everybody

Anybody knows about new Ibm Fortran 2.3 ?

What I'd like to know is what parts of fortran90 are included in this
version (and what are not).

My Ibm man is unable to tell me.

Thanks in advance

Jean Christophe BASAILLE
Universite de Bourgogne, France
Centre de Calcul
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
From: shair@barolo.cso.uiuc.edu (Bob Shair)
Subject: Re: Fortran 90
Reply-To: shair@vnet.ibm.com
Organization: IBM Champaign
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 15:44:34 GMT

Jean Christophe Basaille <BASAILLE@FRCCUB11.BITNET> writes:

>Hi everybody
>
>Anybody knows about new Ibm Fortran 2.3 ?
>
>What I'd like to know is what parts of fortran90 are included in this
>version (and what are not).
>
>My Ibm man is unable to tell me.

Some information is included in the Announcement Letter:
o   The implementation of selected features of the new FORTRAN 90
    standard provides users with access to FORTRAN 90 via XL FORTRAN.
       A path is provided for customers to start accessing the
functionality of the new FORTRAN 90 standard within their existing
compiler.  Some examples of the benefits of these new features are:
o   Interface Blocks
    -   Provide an excellent way to increase the quality of software
        by allowing the compiler to perform checking of actual dummy
        arguments, when used in combination with the -qxtchk option.
o   Derived Types
    -   Provide for software engineering of programs by allowing the
        grouping of related data into one structure.  Improves
        communication with C in interlanguage calls.
o   Internal Procedures
    -   Provide for software engineering of programs by allowing
        algorithms to be divided into subtasks, yet subprograms to
        perform the subtasks are embedded with the subprograms that
        require those subtasks.
o   Named IF and DO
    -   Improves readability and reliability of software by providing
        visual and compiler checking of proper nesting of IFs and
        DOs
--

Bob Shair                          shair@vnet.ibm.com
Scientific Computing Specialist    SHAIR@UIUCVMD (bitnet)
IBM Champaign
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Tue, 10 Nov 1992 14:23:01 -0600
From:         Dennis Putnam <dap@ASNSVR.ASN.NET>
Subject:      imake

I am still struggling with imake and am obviously missing the boat here
somewhere. After building X11/Xamples the template and config files are
there. The make install did not move them anywhere so I assume they should
stay in the /usr/lpp/X11/Xamples/bin directory. That being the case I expected
imake to know where to look for them but that is apparently not the case.
They exist but imake seems to be looking somewhere other than /usr/lpp/X11/
Xamples/bin. Do I have to manually move them to /usr/include? If so
what files have to be there? If I don't have to move them how do I tell imake
where to look? Is there an environment variable I have to set?



Dennis Putnam				Alabama Supercomputer Network
Service Manager				dap@asnsvr.asn.net
Boeing Computer Services		(205) 971-7429
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <bill@romulus.sas.upenn.edu>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Mon, 9 Nov 1992 09:54:05 EST
From:         bill@ROMULUS.SAS.UPENN.EDU
Subject:      Re: WDSF/VM

I'll second Deba's comments.  I use it both for my 320 and for my OS/2
workstation.  Our data center works on a full cost recovery basis.  The
estimated costs for me are $40/month for the 1.2GB RS6K and $30/month for the
OS/2 machine.  Cost is based on #files stored, bytes of data stored, and CPU
usage for the processing.

Note for 3.2.2 users.  Our system people reported a bug in the client for this
release.  IBM has sent a patch and will be putting out an APAR.  As this info
is a week old, they may have already done so.

Bill

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Bill McManus             Director, Inst. Research & Info. Systems
bill@romulus.sas.upenn.edu                      SAS Dean's Office
bmcmanus@gdalsrv.sas.upenn.edu         University of Pennsylvania
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
From: scoggin@opus.ee.udel.edu (John K Scoggin)
Subject: Re: Installation Problem - AIX 3.2.3 SPO 1/4" Tape
Keywords: AIX 3.2.3 SPO tape
Organization: Delmarva Power & Light Company, Newark
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 11:43:04 GMT

In article <BxBun3.FCt@unixhub.SLAC.Stanford.EDU> joann@unixhub.slac.stanford.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov6.151803.3697@udel.edu>, scoggin@opus.ee.udel.edu (John K Scoggin) writes:
>|> I am having a problem installing AIX 3.2.3 from an SPO tape.  When I follow
>|> the instructions (changing key positions and all that other antiquated stuff),
>|> I enter diagnostics mode instead of AIX installtion mode.
>
>Aagh, 1/4" tape. I have only worked with 8mm on AIX, but the principle
>should be the same.
>
>You should be sure before starting that the tape drive is available,
>not just defined. You can do this in smit.
>
>Then put the tape in, shut the door, turn the key to service and
>reboot. It should boot off the tape. If it doesn't, perhaps it is
>a bad tape, or one built without the boot code in front.
>
>*) *) *) *) *) *) *) *) *) *) *)!(* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (*
>Jo Ann Malina, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
>joann@unixhub.slac.stanford.edu  -or-  415/926-2846

You are right.  I found out that IBM shipped me the wrong tape - a non-bootable
one (sigh)...

Thanks.

	- John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
John K. Scoggin, Jr.			Email:   scoggin@udel.edu
Supervisor, Network Operations			 scoggin@delmarva.com
Delmarva Power & Light Co.		Voice:	 302-451-5200
P.O. Box 6066				Fax:	 302-451-5321
Newark, DE 19714-6066
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your milage may vary.  Void where prohibited by law (or common sense).
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Org: Boston University, Office of Information Technology, (617) 353-2780
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Wed, 4 Nov 1992 17:46:37 EST
From:         Kevin Ruderman <CCKR@BUACCA.BITNET>
Subject:      mail facility

Mike McGlone <mmcglone@MGH.COM> wrote:
>We currently have a R6000 model 340, and are using the mail utility which
>came with the BOS. My user community is objecting to using the vi editor
>for making corrections. Currently all the users are using character terminals
>Could anyone suggest a mail facility which uses a wordprocessor style of
>editor, that still works over the internet.

You can select the editors that mail will use in response to the ~e
and ~v commands (that ~ is a tilde in case it gets eaten).  These
and other options (askcc, keep, folder, record) are in the man page.

My .mailrc file has the following line in it:

    set EDITOR=/bin/ed VISUAL=/usr/local/bin/xemacs


Rudi

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Ruderman            (617) 353-2780       cckr@buacca.bu.edu
Information Technology    Boston University    ..!bu.edu!acs!rudi
From: RZ13@DLRVM.BITNET (Klaus Kretschel)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Subject: Re: Imake on AIX
Date: 5 Nov 92 10:02:27 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
              4 Nov 1992 18:19:00 EST from <pcv1584@MVS.DRAPER.COM>

On Wed, 4 Nov 1992 18:19:00 EST Peter C. Vernam said:
>
>>Has anyone set up UNIX Imake on AIX? If so is it public domain and where might
>It comes bundled with the MIT X11R5 distribution, which is available
>from export.lcs.mit.edu and a multitude of other sites.
>
>The X11R3 version of it is also in the AIX 3.1.5 distribution, in
>/usr/lpp/X11/Xamples/util/imake.
>
The X11R4 version comes with AIX 3.2. But I always had difficulties with it,
if the things to install were not in the X11 directories.

Klaus Kretschel
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Fri, 6 Nov 1992 10:44:12 +0100
From:         "M. Nihon" <NIHON@BLIULG11.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: TeX 3.141
              06 Nov 92 09:32:16 +0100 from <MICHEL@vm1.ulg.ac.be>

Je n'ai pas encore de rponse  mon message du 28/10
From: scoggin@opus.ee.udel.edu (John K Scoggin)
Subject: Installation Problem - AIX 3.2.3 SPO 1/4" Tape
Keywords: AIX 3.2.3 SPO tape
Organization: Delmarva Power & Light Company
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 15:18:03 GMT

I am having a problem installing AIX 3.2.3 from an SPO tape.  When I follow
the instructions (changing key positions and all that other antiquated stuff),
I enter diagnostics mode instead of AIX installtion mode.

Anyone else had this problem?

	- John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
John K. Scoggin, Jr.			Email:   scoggin@udel.edu
Supervisor, Network Operations			 scoggin@delmarva.com
Delmarva Power & Light Co.		Voice:	 302-451-5200
P.O. Box 6066				Fax:	 302-451-5321
Newark, DE 19714-6066
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your milage may vary.  Void where prohibited by law (or common sense).
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Wed, 4 Nov 1992 13:52:53 -0600
From:         Dennis Putnam <dap@ASNSVR.ASN.NET>
Subject:      Imake on AIX

Has anyone set up UNIX Imake on AIX? If so is it public domain and where might
I find it?


Dennis Putnam				Alabama Supercomputer Network
Service Manager				dap@asnsvr.asn.net
Boeing Computer Services		(205) 971-7429
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
From: joann@ariadne.SLAC.Stanford.EDU (Jo Ann Malina)
Subject: Re: Installation Problem - AIX 3.2.3 SPO 1/4" Tape
Keywords: AIX 3.2.3 SPO tape
Reply-To: joann@unixhub.slac.stanford.edu
Organization: SLAC (Stanford Linear Accelerator Center)
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 03:49:50 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.151803.3697@udel.edu>, scoggin@opus.ee.udel.edu (John K Scoggin) writes:
|> I am having a problem installing AIX 3.2.3 from an SPO tape.  When I follow
|> the instructions (changing key positions and all that other antiquated stuff),
|> I enter diagnostics mode instead of AIX installtion mode.

Aagh, 1/4" tape. I have only worked with 8mm on AIX, but the principle
should be the same.

You should be sure before starting that the tape drive is available,
not just defined. You can do this in smit.

Then put the tape in, shut the door, turn the key to service and
reboot. It should boot off the tape. If it doesn't, perhaps it is
a bad tape, or one built without the boot code in front.

*) *) *) *) *) *) *) *) *) *) *)!(* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (*
Jo Ann Malina, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
joann@unixhub.slac.stanford.edu  -or-  415/926-2846
Neither Stanford nor the DOE would be caught dead with these opinions.
Nor do they consult me when formulating theirs.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Universite de Bourgogne, Centre de Calcul, France
X-Acknowledge-To: <BASAILLE@FRCCUB11>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Fri, 13 Nov 1992 15:57:20 EST
From:         Jean Christophe Basaille <BASAILLE@FRCCUB11.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Fortran 90
              9 Nov 1992 15:44:34 GMT from <shair@BAROLO.CSO.UIUC.EDU>

Thank you everybody who answered my question about Fortran.

Jean Christophe BASAILLE
Universite de Bourgogne, France
Centre de Calcul
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
Date:         Sat, 7 Nov 1992 16:02:45 -0600
From:         Dennis Putnam <dap@ASNSVR.ASN.NET>
Subject:      imake

Thanks to those who told me were to look in AIX 3.2 for X11 imake. Now I'm
down to the next layer of the onion. I built X11 Xamples but shouldn't there
be a xmkfs command? When I use imake it cannot find the template files and
I don't know how to tell imake where they are. I was told that i have to run
xmkfs -a first but it didn't seem to get built. What did I miss?

Dennis Putnam				Alabama Supercomputer Network
Service Manager				dap@asnsvr.asn.net
Boeing Computer Services		(205) 971-7429
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)