From: CNguyen.osbu_north@xerox.com
Subject: Re: Ho`a Ho+.p Ho`a Gia?i & Gia'o Ho^.i Thie^n Chu'a Gia'o
Originator: daemon@media-lab.media.mit.edu
Reply-To: Cuong_M._Nguyen.OSBU_North@xerox.com
Organization: SCV Relay
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 01:40:28 GMT


Son Hung Cao recently wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: cnguyen.osbu_north@xerox.com
Nguye^~n Cu+o+`ng dda~ vie^'t:
: My question to Quang DDinh and other interest people is:
:    Between "To^? Quo^'c va` Gia'o Ho^.i" if you have only one choice,
: which is to put one aside for the benefit of the other, then which one will
:  you
: put aside? Your country or your Vatican (Gia'o Ho^.i)?
: /cuong
(Stuffs deleted)
:    1. Ba.n QD dda~ ma<.c nhie^n coi Gia'o Ho^.i == To^n Gia'o?
.....
: Ve^\ so^' 1, ne^'u ddu'ng thi\ tha^.t la\ "he^'t y' kie^'n".
: /cuong

Tru+o+'c khi tra? lo+`i ca^u ho?i cu?a anh Nguyen Cuong, to^i xin go'p va`i
y' kie^'n ma` anh ta dda~ vie^'t nhu+ tre^n.
...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Before I have any comment over SHC's latest writing (and may be more as he
ended his with (co\n tie'p)) I want to make sure that SHC fully understood my
question to "Quang DDinh and other interest people". My question to Quang DDinh
and other interest people was:

#	Between "To^? Quo^'c va` Gia'o Ho^.i" if you have only one choice,
#	which is to put one aside for the benefit of the other, then which one
will you
#	put aside? Your country or your Vatican (Gia'o Ho^.i)?
#	/cuong

Remember, I wrote "To^? Quo^'c va` Gia'o Ho^.i" not "To^? Quo^'c va` Thie^n
Chu'a Gia'o" and "to put one aside for the benfit of the other" not "to get rid
of one for the benefit of the other." OK ?  In Vietnamese it means to me "de.p
vie^.c rie^ng dde^? la\m vie^.c chung":

Ne^'u mo^.t nguo\i co' nhu*~ng ha\nh ddo^.ng cho^'ng bang giao, cho^'ng tie^'p
va^.n, cho^'ng HHHG, v..v... nhu* va^.y ta.i sao Vatican dda~ hai la^\n (va\
la^\n thu*' ba ddang xa?y ra...) tie^'p xu'c, lie^n la.c, tha?o lua^.n, v..v...
vo*'i chi'nh quye^\n co^.ng sa?n ma\ kho^ng the\m dde^'m xi?a to*'i co^.ng
ddo^\ng Vie^.t Nam thi\ la.i kho^ng tha^'y anh ta co' mo^.t pha?n u*?ng na\o
ca? ? DDa~ va^.y co\n no'i nhu*~ng ca^u nhu* "no' xin xo?, no' na<n ni?"
"kho^ng the\m tie^'p" thi\ ca'c ba.n netters nghi~ sao ?

Think about this:

	'A' qua nha\ 'B' hai la^\n dde^? no'i chuye^.n
	Sau ddo' 'B' qua nha\ 'A' mo^.t la^\n dde^? no'i chuye^.n
	Ro^\i 'A' se~ qua nha\ 'B' la^\n thu*' ba dde^? cu\ng la\m chung mo^.t
vie^.c di'nh li'u to*'i 'A'
	Ca? hai 'A' va\ 'B' kho^ng tie^'t lo^. ra ngoa\i 'what the hell they're
really doing.'

Du*.a tre^n nhu*~ng du*~ kie^.n tre^n, co' ke? no'i:

	" Xi' ! ca'i tha<\ng 'B' no' qua nha\ o^ng 'A' la\ dde^? no' na<n ni?,
xin xo? ma\ co\n bi. tu*\ cho^'i, o^ng xe^'p nha\ 'A' kho^ng the\m tie^'p no'"

thi\ ca'c ba.n netters tha^'y the^' na\o? Co' nghe lo.t lo^~ tai cha<ng? Does
it make any sense? Be objective !

Vi\ the^' ca^u ho?i mo*'i ddu*o*.c ne^u le^n.

If after reading the above SHC still have the same understanding of my question
like he did in the past then I'll be glad to take my time to comment on his
writing. Please let me know.

/cuong