HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: v120qldp@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (JAY WALKER)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.internet
Subject: j: Re: j: Re: j: Re: WWIVnet?
Date: 19 Nov 92 01:22:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Nov18.212428.6539@hernix.org>, amg@hernix.org (Alan M. Gindlesperger) writes...
>In article <BxvwMx.5t2@acsu.buffalo.edu> v120qldp@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (JAY WALKER) writes:
>>There is also a new program used to bring FidoNet to a WWIV board called
>>WWIVgate.  I'm working on setting that up myself.  
>
>I gotta ask you.  How do you configure the FidoNET for like Poll sites 'n 
>stuff?

HUH??

I haven't even finished setting up FrontDoor yet, let alone WWIVgate let alone
anything else.  I have no idea what a Poll site is or what "stuff" you are
referring to.

Jay Walker, A real confused guy

   WWIVnet 1@7659 | IceNET 1@7659 | WWIVLink 1@17659 | SysOp:  Disaster Area
   v120qldp@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu | 14400 v.32bis * 9600 v.32 | (716)683-6657

 If you've done six impossible things today, why not top it off by calling DA?
From: ee_d316@ceres.kingston.ac.uk (Deep Purple)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.internet
Subject: Satellite Pictures
Date: 23 Nov 1992 18:10:02 -0000
Organization: Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames
Distribution: uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: ceres.kingston.ac.uk

Hi
  Can someone reminde me of the site that has up todate Weather Satellite 
pictures stored on them. Also can you tell me in what format these files are 
stored in.


Steve
From: mohneydp@ucunix.san.uc.edu (Duane P Mohney)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.internet
Subject: Re: j: Re: WWIVnet?
Summary: WWIVnet Internet Route
Keywords: WWIV
Date: 18 Nov 92 15:33:01 GMT
Distribution: alt.bbs.internet
Organization: University of Cincinnati

I hate to say it but there is a WWIVnet gate at tfsquad.mn.org if
you want to use this gate you proceed your WWIVnet address with a
WWIV! , change the @ to a -, and then route it to tfsquad.mn.org. 
Buy doing this you have ascess to 8 other networks.

Duane P.Mohney
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: corywest@is.rice.edu (Cory West)
Subject: What's a BBS? (No, this is not what you think...)
Organization: Well, none really, but I know where my socks are!
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 11:34:51 GMT


	Hello everyone.  I'm looking for the answers to the 
following questions to satisfy my own curiosity and as research
on what people would want in a BBS:

	What is a BBS to you? 
	What features do you look for in a BBS?  
	What does a BBS do for you?
	What is your favorite BBS package and setup?  Why?
	How do (or how could) BBS systems improve the general good?
		(This might be as communication tools, as
		 recreational things, or whatever...)

	This is giving you the perfect opportunity to brag about
your favorite BBS system or complain about systems that you don't
like.  Please send mail to corywest@rice.edu.  Thanks.
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Originator: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu
Organization: University of Vermont -- Division of EMBA Computer Facility
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 16:48:41 GMT

From article <1992Nov19.232310.847@global.hacktic.nl>, by peter@global.hacktic.nl (Peter Busser):
> cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise) writes:
> 
>>	Larry, please back this up in terms of the BBS world.  That is,
>>please compare it to another BBS program (not an OS).  The only 2 arguments
>>that I've ever heard from you that I will agree TBBS is limited is a) the
>>non-ability to run DOS programs and b) the in-ability to scan/toss Fidonet/
>>Internet messages while the system is running.
> 
> Aren't that enough reasons (besides that it is expen$$$$$ive?)???
> 
	I don't think they're enough, no.  I think TBBS's strength's
lie in it's speed and incredible customization ability.  It's also 
fairly easy to setup, the complexity based on how complex you want to
make the system *grin*

	As for the limitations I listed, a) can be easily be replaced
with TDBS and the associated programs you can buy/write for it that
can run under TBBS/TDBS (which *sigh* can be countered again by the price of
the TDBS module and the sometimes abnormally priced programs).

	b) is a limitation, and it doesn't look like it will be "fixed" by
means of eventually toss/scanning on the BBS machine.  There are rumors
that eventually there will be that capability with another machine (LAN),
but they are only rumors, and I myself don't like the idea of having to
buy another machine simply to process mail (makes me think of the BBS
software that requires a different machine for each node :(

	As for expense, it is and it isn't.  If you're only running
a 3-4 line system, then paying $900 for TBBS 16 is probably a bit
much.  However, if you want to run a full 32 lines, I can only see it as
cheaper for the performance you get.  I know of no DOS BBS program
(thinking of RA, QuickBBS, PCBoard, etc.) that will run this many lines
on a single CPU without any loss of performance for the other users
on the other lines without going the multi-machine/for/multi-node
route.

 TTYL
 Chris
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: John_Maxwell@mindlink.bc.ca (John Maxwell)
Subject: Re: WANTED: What you like and don't like about BBSes?
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:52:33 GMT

HI.

I think there is too much emphasis put on making all BBS's GUI. The beauty of
the VT100 ansi interface is that ANYBODY can get on, regardless of what
hardware they're running. If we need machines with 40mhz processors and 10meg
RAM just to communicate, we're not helping anybody except Apple, IBM,
Microsoft, and so on.

      -JMax

Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: spatu@admiral.uucp (Brian McGroarty)
Subject: FidoNet Unix BBS?
Reply-To: spatu@admiral.uucp (Brian McGroarty)
Organization: The Grid/Waffle BBS, 203-661-2873, -1279, -0450, -2967
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 23:04:40 GMT

Hai!  Might anyone know whether there is such a thing as a BBS program 
(or separate mailer) for Unix that supports sending and receiving FidoNet 
mail and FREQs?  I'd like to move my current BBS over onto an Amiga 
3000UX, but I won't do it if I can't keep some of the networks (not 
neccessarily Fido) that I'm subscribing to/will be subscribing to in the 
near future.
 
Many thanks!
 
Brian McGroarty 

--
spatu%admiral.uucp@yale.edu (Brian McGroarty) <yale!admiral!spatu>
The Admiral's Public UNIX - Greenwich, CT - System Administrator: Doug Fields
(HST/V32) (203)661-2873 -- (PEP/V32) -1279 -- (V32) -0450 -- (V29/MNP6) -2967
>FREE!< Unix shell accounts, Usenet access, and Internet-style mail available
From: sh.chen@fs3.mbs.ac.uk (Sherman Chen)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: WANTED: What you like and don't like about BBSes?
Date: 13 Nov 92 14:11:39 GMT
Organization: Manchester Business School

I am doing some work on BBSes and would like to know what you like and don't 
like about the bbses you use.

I am interested in these instances in particular.
1.  Ease of Use - How easy is it for you to use the bbs, how easy is it for 
you to navigate in it.
2.  Functionalities - Are you interested in download and upload software, 
the bulletin boards, the multi-line chat system, a private chat feature, e-
mail, games, matchmaking.
3.  In term of E-mail, what kind of access do you like?  How important would 
you like to have access to other bbses, internet, bitnet, fidonet, etc.
4.  How much would you like to pay for a system, if a fee is involved (
please be realistic and not treat this as a joke with an answer of $.01/
year)?
5.  Would you like a graphics based bbs or the command line bbs 
currently in use?
6.  How fast do you like the bbs communicate with your modem? 2400, 9600, 14.
4, or higher?
7.  What kind of computer equipment do you have, in term of cpu and modem 
and video board?
8.  For the bbs sysop, how easy is it for you to get your system started and 
running (please give a time reference if possible)?
9.  For the bbs sysop,  how easy is it for you to add extra feature to your 
board, i.e. matchmaking, doors, etc.?

That's it for now....

Please send all reply to me if possible.
My e-mail address is:
email:sh.chen@fs3.mbs.ac.uk
      sh.chen%uk.ac.mbs.fs3@cns.umist.ac.uk

Thank you very much.

Sherman Chen
From: Alexander.Schwallbach@thedump.UUCP (Alexander Schwallbach)
Sender: FredGate@thedump.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Maximus/NetWare
Date: 18 Nov 92  12:12:18 EST

Anyone using Maximus CBCS in a Netware Enviroment?


                                                Alex
From: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Originator: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu
Organization: University of Vermont -- Division of EMBA Computer Facility
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 23:57:52 GMT

From article <By35n0.45D@gator.rn.com>, by larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder):
> cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise) writes:
>> (which *sigh* can be countered again by the price of
>>the TDBS module and the sometimes abnormally priced programs).
> 
> Gosh - this "another dBase III clone" is another $700+ on top of what
> you rake out for TBBS.  Now you have $1500 in the package which can tie
> up a computer making it unavailable for local users running their applications
> while the BBS is up and on-line

	At least you read my original comments. *sigh*
> 
>>much.  However, if you want to run a full 32 lines, I can only see it as
>>cheaper for the performance you get.  I know of no DOS BBS program
>>(thinking of RA, QuickBBS, PCBoard, etc.) that will run this many lines
> 
> Major/Glaticom both offer the same performance

	And is even more expensive than TBBS.

 TTYL
 Chris
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: rdippold@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 01:01:32 GMT

tedc@ee.ubc.ca (ted chen) writes:
>Can TBBS be run in a OS/2 DOS VDM?

Yes.  You have to be careful with the paging, however, so that the
expanded memory latency isn't too large.
-- 
The early worm gets eaten first.
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Originator: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu
Organization: University of Vermont -- Division of EMBA Computer Facility
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 04:37:57 GMT

From article <1992Nov22.125529.414@global.hacktic.nl>, by peter@global.hacktic.nl (Peter Busser):
> (Insisting that it should run under DOS is silly since you can't use it from
> within TBBS anyway. If you insist on comparing TBBS with other DOS systems,
> then I insist that you pull out the smart serial board(s) and run TBBS on
> normal 8250/16450 serial chips! Read on...)
> 
> Well, the real reason isn't that systems like RA, QBBS, PCBoard, Wildcat,
> Maximus, Opus, Magpie, Telegard, SBBS, and all the others are more ineficient
> than TBBS. Okay, they take more memory but the difference in price can easily
> compensate that. The real reason is that TBBS supports smart multi-port boards
> and the others don't. These boards do the real work. TBBS just supervises these
> boards and only needs to send a block of bytes to such a board once in a
> while. On a system with 16 lines, all actively downloading at high speed, you
> should see only a few percent CPU usage. If TBBS had to do all the character
> I/O to and from the serial ports, then there wouldn't be such a difference in
> performance between TBBS and any other DOS BBS program. Not even though DV
> has probably more overhead than TBBS.
> 
> This means in short that it isn't TBBS that is responsible for the speed, it's
> the hardware. Fortunately, supporting smart hardware isn't a unique TBBS
> feature. An OS/2 or UNIX system which had drivers that could use the same
> boards as TBBS would be as fast if not faster (probably better file system and
> *less* (that's no typo) OS overhead) than DOS+TBBS. The same kind of boards
> exist for UNIX. They might exist for OS/2 too. Any BBS system that can support
> a UNIX tty device or an OS/2 COMxx: device can use these boards and get the
> same or better speed as TBBS.

	Nice theory, but as you present it (and as I understand it), it's
wrong.  TBBS does not support "intellegent" cards, ie. DigiBoards with
onboard processors/memory.

> THERE IS NO ADVANTAGE IN RUNNING TBBS. There *WAS* maybe a reason, but there is
> none anymore.

	Care to explain?

 TTYL
 Chris

Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: ssturgis@netcom.com (Scott Sturgis)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:19:29 GMT

In article <BxuzHL.7F5@gator.rn.com> larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>tom@spud.kludge.com (Tom Lemos) writes:
>
>
>TBBS is nice, but it's so damn limited.  If your happy with a canned
>product, then TBBS might be a good solution.  If you want the ultimate
>in flexibility, then forget TBBS.
>-- 

Larry I am curious. EXCLUDING Unix based bbs systems What would you
recomend to someone and why?

Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu.UUCP (Chris Blaise)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Originator: cblaise@moose.uvm.edu
Organization: University of Vermont -- Division of EMBA Computer Facility
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:26:31 GMT

From article <BxuzHL.7F5@gator.rn.com>, by larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder):
> TBBS is nice, but it's so damn limited.  If your happy with a canned
> product, then TBBS might be a good solution.  If you want the ultimate
> in flexibility, then forget TBBS.

	Larry, please back this up in terms of the BBS world.  That is,
please compare it to another BBS program (not an OS).  The only 2 arguments
that I've ever heard from you that I will agree TBBS is limited is a) the
non-ability to run DOS programs and b) the in-ability to scan/toss Fidonet/
Internet messages while the system is running.

 TTYL
 Chris
From: bx791@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Alan Michael Gindlesperger)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Unix/InterNET BBS
Date: 16 Nov 1992 01:28:47 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu


How would I go about starting a UNIX BBS that people could
access by typing like 'bbs' at the logon prompt...

I want to do this...but I don't want to go out and buy a whole
UNIX system and keep it in my house.  Mabye if I could use
someone else's system...or if I could get most of the fund payed
by a small organization.  PLEASE HELP!!!!
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745 
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:38:27 GMT

adamg@eff.org (Adam Gaffin) writes:

>Uncle! You're absolutely right. You can not do every single thing with
>TBBS that you might do with your Unix setup.  On the other hand, I am
>running a two-line BBS on an 8 MHz AT with 640K of RAM.  For what my
>company is using the BBS for, that is more than adequate, and we didn't
>have to spend several hundred/thousand dollars more just so somebody can
>have fun with perl scripts.

I was running QNX on a 286 and had 4 HSTs all locked at 19200 baud
on dumb ports -- and throughput was in the 1600 cps range.  I was
able to spawn external QNX applications on any of the lines.

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Xref: sparky alt.bbs:7031 alt.bbs.allsysop:798
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.allsysop
From: rkim@csri.toronto.edu (Ryan Kim)
Subject: Looking for FILES.BBS manager for Maximus
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 17 Nov 92 14:36:35 GMT

Does anyone have a good file areas manager for Maximus?
I've tried FEBBS, but, it's too complicated and difficult to use.

FTP site, e-mail, or net-post will be appreciated.

Thanks


__________________________________________________________________________

Ryan Kim
University of Toronto, Electrical Engineering,
Computer Group, M.A.Sc. Student            Rm SF2206        (416)978-5274
e-mail:  rkim@csri.toronto.edu
__________________________________________________________________________
From: sl9dm@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Date: 17 Nov 92 18:41:31 MDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Utah State University

In article <721643537snx@sound.demon.co.uk>, Rob@sound.demon.co.uk (Robert J Barth) writes:
> OK, here's my situation:
> I'm running RemoteAccess (great s/w!), and I have:
> 2 lines, both Courier Dual Standard V32bis/HST,
> and they both run under desqview                   = 1 machine
Check..

> Upgrading to 3 lines would mean either...
> a. Netware, with Server, CDrom Server, 3 nodes     = 5 machines
> b. Netware Lite, Lantastic etc, 3 peer-peer nodes  = 3 machines
> c. TBBS ???                                        = 1 machine <grin>
  d. RemoteAccess?                                   = 1 machine <grin>

> What would I need ? Multiplexors ? I've got the 2 external DSs, and
> an unlimited supply of internal 144's.... would I be able to use these
> or would they have to be external + 16550 chips ?
14.4k internals HAVE a 16550 chip on them! and RemoteAccess can be set up to
handle up to I think it's either 99 or 150 lines at once. only time you need
more than 1 machine is if you have used all your options on 1 machine (32 com
ports with IRQ sharing & Non-Standard COM addresses (Com14?))
YOu have RA running fine with 2 lines, just add another DIR, another CONFIG.RA
and any changed .RA/.BBS files to that directory. Bruce Bodger (RemoteAccess
Help for the USA) runs like 5 or 6 lines on his 1 machine (2 numbers. 1 for
9600+ callers and the other for 3/12/24 callers)


> Useability ? Can I configure menus / screens / routes / message / file areas
> as nicely as I can in RemoteAccess ?
Sorta, but for one thing, TBBS is *NOT* Desqview capible. This I hear from my
old boss, who hear from AUTHOR! for Another, TBBS has a limit of 64
message/file areas I belive the count is. and cann't go above 62,000 messages
TOTAL.   IMHO It's best to stick with RA!


> 
> Please, anyone with experience with BOTH RA & TBBS would be wonderful
I've had experience, and IMHO, TBBS SUCKS!
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Personal opinion junk was brought to you by one of the following Folks:

In the BBS World: The Master Ninja
in the REAL world: Dan Egli
on the Internet: SL9DM@CC.USU.EDU
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: tom@spud.kludge.com (Tom Lemos)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 10:13:20 PST
Organization: T.T.L.F.  San Francisco, CA

Rob@sound.demon.co.uk (Robert J Barth) writes:

> >	TBBS is a commercial BBS package for MS/DR-DOS machines.  It's primary
> >strength is that it is written in 100% assembly language and is arguably
> >o      The only other limitation I can think of is Price.
> 
> OK, here's my situation:
> I'm running RemoteAccess (great s/w!), and I have:
> 2 lines, both Courier Dual Standard V32bis/HST,
> and they both run under desqview                   = 1 machine
> Upgrading to 3 lines would mean either...
> a. Netware, with Server, CDrom Server, 3 nodes     = 5 machines
> b. Netware Lite, Lantastic etc, 3 peer-peer nodes  = 3 machines
> c. TBBS ???                                        = 1 machine <grin>
> 
> What would I need ? Multiplexors ? I've got the 2 external DSs, and

Digiboards if you're gonna use TBBS. Turns one slot into 8. Real nice.


Tom@spud.kludge.COM                             Tater Tot Liberation Front
"People should be taught what is, not what should be."    San Francisco,CA
                                         -Lenny Bruce      +1.415.255.8340
From: dawson@willard.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: TEAMate BBS software?
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 17:05:23 EST
Organization: Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814

ahbritto@orac.holonet.net (Arthur H. Britto) writes:

> crosenberg@igc.apc.org (Charlie Rosenberg) writes:
> 
> >I am looking for information about the TEAMate unix BBS product.
> 
> The TEAMate demonstration system is available at 310-318-8437 (8N1) with
> VT100 emulation, login: public
> 
> Or, telnet to hpc.ans.net (147.225.1.51)
> 
> Voice: 310-318-1322

That IP address is on the commercial Internet, yes?  I could not access
when I tried from gatech...

-- 
dawson@willard.UUCP (Willard Dawson)
gatech!vdbsan!willard!dawson
emory!slammer!willard!dawson
Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814
From: patrickd@wpi.WPI.EDU (Lazer)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Fraudigy
Date: 21 Nov 1992 04:08:14 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu
Summary: E-mail
Keywords: Prodigy, Fraudigy

I have the E-mail address for someone I wish to contact on Prodigy.

Is it yet possible to E-mail a Prodigy account through InterNet or UseNet?
How?

I cringe at the thought that the person I want to contact (who is not a family
member or anyone I know...yet) uses that system.  Ack!  So can I reach him
without having to go in myself?
 
DISCLAIMER: I tried Prodigy...but I didn't inhale.

-- 
-Lazer (Patrick Delahanty)    |WARNING!: MST3K, Apple ][, Macintosh, Back to
InterNet: patrickd@wpi.wpi.edu|          the Future fan and co-sysop L/A Blues!
          lazer@lablues.UUCP  |Call L/A Blues BBS at (207) 777-3465 for IBM
    * I HATE MICROSOFT! *     |Mac, & Apple ][ files, TradeWars 2002, & USENET!
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: peten@iat.holonet.net (Pete Norton)
Subject: Re: HOLONET? YOu BET!
Organization: HoloNet (BBS: 510-704-1058)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 22:18:53 GMT

tony@disk.uucp (tony) writes:
: neta@iat.holonet.net (Gregory Giagnocavo) writes:
: 
: >Jim asked tohear from a Holonet member.
: >We are, members/subscirbers of Holonet. It is a fine, inexpensive system
: >with far more features than you'd expect for the price.
: >Full Internet access, directly connected -so no delays
: >And a complete Internet services menu, so you don't have to get lost 
: >I recommend it to anyone. And, it is reachable from  almost anywhere,
: >since they hae low cost packet switching.
: >Also feature full Usenet news groups.
: 
: Do they get _all_ the UseNet groups?  Some of the boards I call don't get cer-
: tain groups.  Only the college board around here gets alt.sex.  There are other
: boards around that get UseNet but they censor the list.  Does HoloNet do any
: censoring -- as if modemers are a STUPID lot, too stupid to decide on their own
: what they should be allowed to read -- uh, if not, I might be interested.  But
: if they do censor what their users are allowed to read they can keep it all all
: to themselves (oh, and you).  I guess you can tell I'm leery -- that's just be-
: cause so many system operators around here don't respect people's 1st Amendment
: rights to be able to read anything they want.
:      
: 	Oh, I should add...  the nixpub board I'm mailing from doesn't get alt.
: sex either... but at least we have the option of a "private" subscription if
: it's that important to us.  To me it isn't -- the group is too heavily contrib-
: uted to and I'd have to delete 20 screens of new messages every day.  I just
: think it's the principle of the matter, not so much the fact of the matter.
: 
:    Holonet has almost 4000 newsgroups including the alt.sex ones.
-- 
Pete Norton
peten@well.sf.ca.us
peten@holonet.net
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: jwidner@onetouch.COM (Jim Widner)
Subject: Holonet
Organization: MCS/OneTouch, Inc.
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 22:50:01 GMT
Summary: Want info on Holonet service.
Keywords: Holonet BBS Internet

I would be interested in hearing from anyone who might be using
the Holnet bbs.  It looks mighty tempting as I do not have
ftp access and this board provides it for what looks to me to
be a reasonable fee.

As most already have most of the services this bbs provides, you
can email me directly.

-- 
_______________________________Jim Widner_________________________________

Columbus, Ohio                             jwidner@onetouch.COM
CIS: 74566,3041         		...!uunet!onetouch!jwidner