HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Ending of ALIENS...
Date: 6 Apr 92 15:41:13 GMT
Organization: HHMI/Human Genetics, Univ of Pa.

In article <1992Apr6.013511.10366@unlinfo.unl.edu>, gberigan@cse.unl.edu 
(Life...) writes:
> They are using the term "bug hunt" in the sense of computers and other
> electronics.  "Is this going to be a stand-up fight [battle], sir, or
> another bug hunt [debugging]?"

Greg, you gotta be kidding.  Do you think "bug hunt" was referring to
electronics?  No way!!!

I suggest you read R.A.Heinlein's "Starship Trooper".  
That's what a bug hunt is: Hunting aliens.

Greg Bole	                    Maid Marian: "Why, you speak treason!"
bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu         Robin Hood: "Fluently"
                                    From _The Adventures of Robin Hood_
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Monday, 6 Apr 1992 18:28:03 EDT
From: Eric Leven <ESL108@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Some Titles by ILM since 1977
Distribution: na


Well, you've done your homework, but surely you can't
forget that ILM did Dragonslayer, which is judged by ILM employees to be one
of their greatest achievment.

It was in DragonSlayer that ILM developed the Go-Motion process of visual
effects; their more realistic version of stop-motion.

Also, the previous post has confused ILM with Skywalker Sound. Yes, they are
two seperate entities, and shouldn't be mixed. For example, Skywalker Sound
Marin and Los Angeles were used in the post production of BackDraft, but ILM
played no part in their visual effects.

Eric Leven
"Unlearn what you have learned..."
From: adam@sw.stratus.com (Mark Adam)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Buckaroo Banzai and the Watermelon
Date: 10 Apr 92 18:41:38 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.

> >The Truth About The Watermelon:
>  
> >At the time of the Oscillation Overthruster experiment, the Banzai Institute
> >was also looking into ways of solving the Ethiopian Famine.  One of the 
> >projects under development was a watermelon that could be dropped out of an
> >airplane, and eaten at their leisure.  That was why the watermelon was in the 
> >press - to see if it would burst.  (No explanation as to just how the damn
> >thing was supposed to be CUT......)
> 

the concept was that the watermellon was engineered to withstand fantastic
pressures but still be vulnerable to shearing stress. in other words, once it was
safely on the ground the locals could come up and cut it with whatever was handy.

-- 

mark ----------------------------
(adam@paix.sw.stratus.com)
		"Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers that smell bad."
From: jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Jim Mann)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Batman vs. Spiderman
Date: 14 Apr 92 15:26:36 GMT
Reply-To: jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com

In article <rauser.702945880@sfu.ca> rauser@fraser.sfu.ca (Richard John  
Rauser) writes:
> 
> 
>    If Batman fought Spiderman, who would win? Granted Spidey is much  
stronger
> and faster...but Batman's got a wealth of gadgets and his studly  
armour. 
> Both are brilliant (remember, Peter Parker was a science grad student)  
but
> Batman is much shrewder IMHO. More importantly, if these two heroes  
were to
> fight to the death, who would you netters cheer for?
> 

Ah, but that's a minor problem compared to the far more 
interesting matchup: if Dennis the Menace squared off against
Calvin, who would win?

Seriously, maybe it's time for a call for vote on 
rec.arts.silly-matchups or somesuch.  Folks seem to be ignoring the
line about this sort of thing in the FAQ.


--
Jim Mann                                       
jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com 
Stratus Computer
From: boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com (The fox so cunning and free)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Ending of ALIENS...
Date: 8 Apr 92 11:23:08 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation

In article <1992Apr8.034938.11833@eecs.nwu.edu>, kaufman@eecs.nwu.edu (Michael L. Kaufman) writes...
} In article <1992Apr6.104113.1@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu> bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole) writes:

}} That's what a bug hunt is: Hunting aliens.

} I agree, but if you will recall, they hadn't ever met any aliens (of any
} sort) yet, so where did the term come from?

Who are you referring to by "they"?  The Colonial Marines in ALIENS?  Who
said they never met any aliens or any sort yet?  Don't you recall the
dinner-table conversation where they mention Arcturians?

-- 

	"Buster, this trip downriver has been truly special.
	 Downright Twainian in a Hitchcockian sort of way."


--- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC, "The Mill", Maynard, MA)

    boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com
From: JMH131@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Maniacs vs. madness.
Date: 12 Apr 92 22:32:11 GMT
Organization: HAM - Hackers Against MUDs
X-Subliminal-Message: IBM/370 assembler is your friend.


 Wouldn't it be cool if they had a movie where Jason, Freddy Krueger, Michael
 Myers, Pinhead, and Leatherface formed an alliance against the forces of good.
 What could possibly stand in their way?  Or would they fight against each
 other because they spoiled each others plans?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: ndj20710@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Nathan D. Johnson)
Subject: Re: Batman vs. Spiderman
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 04:20:45 GMT

rauser@fraser.sfu.ca (Richard John Rauser) writes:



>   If Batman fought Spiderman, who would win? Granted Spidey is much stronger
>and faster...but Batman's got a wealth of gadgets and his studly armour. 
>Both are brilliant (remember, Peter Parker was a science grad student) but
>Batman is much shrewder IMHO. More importantly, if these two heroes were to
>fight to the death, who would you netters cheer for?

>--
>Richard J. Rauser   "I like fighting Chun Li.
>rauser@sfu.ca        Especially when I slide under her legs and glance up."
>WNI                                            -Dhalsim

The obvious choice is to cheer for Zot, since he wouldn't be stupid enough to
get involved in this sort of thing. But doesn't this sort of nonsense really
belong in rec.arts.comics?
	nate

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: ss@sparkplug.WPI.EDU (Scott N Streeter)
Subject: Re: Star Wars canon stuff. Stop it please
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609-2280
	<1992Apr12.101810.24285@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
	<92103.213518EAO102@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 12:31:07 GMT


>    Hey guys, I have a question that's been bothering me for many years.
> Why didn't Han Solo use a lightsaber.  He was a jedi knight after all.

Well everyone has been flaming this guy, but I'd like to know his
reason for asking this question, or did he just post it on purpose to
start a flame war. I any case I'd like to point out that in the book
"The Art of Star Wars" there are early Han Solo sketches in there, that
show Han holding a light saber. I am speculating that Lucas's original
idea was to have the light saber as the main weapon in the Star Wars
universe to give it a more Swashbuckler kind of feel. Kind of like in
Ice Pirates (great movie).

--
                        Scott Streeter
                        ss@wpi.wpi.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: u906789@bruny.cc.utas.edu.au (Mark Julian Turner)
Subject: Re: T2: that's not a plot hole!
Organization: University of Tasmania, Australia.
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 06:36:25 GMT

jaufrecht@pomona.claremont.edu writes:

>Something else to consider:

>It was originally intended for audiences not to know which time traveler was
>the good and which was the bad.  Thus, Arnold acts pretty brutal in the
>beginning, and the T-1000 doesn't do anything onscreen that Reese wouldn't have
>done.  Thus, it is implied that the T-1000 punched the cop and stole his
>clothing.

This is not implied at all.
  Unfortunately, for marketing reasons the fact the Arnold was the
>good guy was publicized, and this plot twist was somewhat obscured.  Sigh.  But
>give Cameron a little more credit; without prior knowledge, the mall scene in
>which Arnold saves John would have been _really_ cool.

Yeah, i agree.
>-Joel
From: vjmurphy@carina.unm.edu (Phred T. Platypus)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: STar Wars and New Gods comics
Date: 13 Apr 92 03:32:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: lynx.knwjynj
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1992Apr12.230458.5004@ac.dal.ca> medusa@ac.dal.ca writes:
>Can any one confirm or deny the recent statements in the magazine
>"Film Comment" that the characters, equipment and storyline of the
>Star Wars movies were copied from the early 1970's comic book 
>series, "New Gods", or something like that.  Anyway they were
>created by Jack Kirby.

    I think the article glossed over the comparisons.  Heck, I
 could've written a whole article on the similarities.  Anyhow,
 I wouldn't be surprised - Lucas surely knew of the comic and
 had probably read it.  What the heck was the Silver Surfer picture
 doing in that article?


-- 
"You ask me if sex is one of the most  _\_\    _/_/     Phred Platypus
 important things in life?  Absolutely. _\_\  _/_/  Grammarian of Vengeance
 But the lack of it is even likelier     _\_\_/_/ [ vjmurphy@carina.unm.edu ]
 to drive you nuts." -- Harlan Ellison    _\_/       Vincent J. Murphy
From: bcushman@lust.reed.edu (Ben Cushman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Mistake at beginning of T2
Date: 7 Apr 92 02:46:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Apr7.024611.8707
Organization: Reed College, Portland, OR


> The T1000 is metal, inorganic. It was probably wrapped in a layer of
> organic flesh, similar to the covering of the T800 series, which burned
> away during the temporal displacement.
> 
> --Rat
>

	If it is that simple, why didn't they wrap weapons in flesh for  
displacement-- or place them in flesh packets sewn on the backs of the  
persons displaced.  I might be wrong, but I thought that the tissue had to  
be living.  Further, if the T1000's flesh burned away during displacement,  
why weren't the other persons who were displaced burned?

					Ben Cushman
					Reed College
From: alberti@mudhoney.micro.umn.edu (Albatross)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Could Batman beat the T-1000?
Date: 8 Apr 92 22:44:30 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis: CIS

In <rauser.702762257@sfu.ca> rauser@fraser.sfu.ca (Richard John Rauser) writes:
>   Batman vs. the T-1000....who would win??

Batman, of course.  He's the hero.  What, you don't know how these things work?
--
Bob Alberti: Computer & Information Services U of MN   |aka: Albatross| Unitar-
Internet   : alberti@boombox.micro.umn.edu             |Metropolis BBS| ian/
Disclaimer : My employer does not mean what I say.     |(612) 721-1870| Univer-
Ingredients: 30% header, 30% quote, 10% comment, 30% cutesy signature.| salist!
From: csf195@cch.coventry.ac.uk (STBW)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Kenner Star Wars: where's yak face?????
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:33:26 GMT
Organization: ASHTRAY(Against Short Hair That Really Annoys You)

In article <1992Apr7.224011.3644@iscsvax.uni.edu> adamson2720@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:
>claims made me suspicious and I can't help but feel there are YAK FACES


They were available in England (and Scotland :-), I know, I've got one
in my Star Wars collection, I hate to think how much money went into all the
stuff I've got :-)

But anyway, they do exist, I even saw another one in a Car Boot Sale last
year, at the time I was so filled with emotion I bought a Rebel Commando :-)

Boy did that bring back memories of searching store after store to find
the new line of SW figures, I've spent more then a third of my life doing
that :-)

What I've escaped that now, I can pass any number of star wars toys and
not feel the urg to buy, unless you've seen a Han Solo in Stormtrooper
outfit ???? :-)

I'm not looking forward to the new films, I couldn't aford the toys these
days :-)

Anyway, back to work :-)



-- 
   \  /     "Me, the artist, has produced all this with my own imagination
   /\/\     and skill... Oi!! Yes, you at the back, stop laughing !"  8~}
 \/ -- \  <csf195@uk.ac.cov.cch> is (Mirrir, Skippy, Jase, Slarts... Pick 1 :-)
From: sprocket@cbnewsi.cb.att.com (dean.s.jones)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Could Batman beat the T-1000?
Summary: ray gun
Keywords: Buford, pass me that extra straightjacket
Date: 9 Apr 92 20:35:18 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <kw4th##@rpi.edu>, cleggp@aix.rpi.edu (Paul Jason Clegg) writes:
> In article <19944@castle.ed.ac.uk> asr@castle.ed.ac.uk (Angus "Fluffy" Rae) writes:
> >
> >>In article <1992Apr9.005014.22428@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>, egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes...
> >"Oh goody! My Illidium Pew-36 Explosive Space Modulator"
> 
> Minor Point:  I think it was "Plutonium Pu-238 Explosive Space Modulator".
> "Pu" is the abbreviation for Plutonium, and it has a 238 ion form. (Or whatever

NOOOOOOOO!!!!  It's  Uranium Pu-38 Explosive Space Modulator

						Dean Jones
						AT&T Bell Labs
						dean@hos1cad.att.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: mortoncp@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Christopher P Morton)
Subject: Re: Star Wars Series
Reply-To: mortoncp@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Christopher P Morton)
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 21:17:24 GMT

In article <4FCA34890000CADB@knox.bitnet> WADDELL@knox.BITNET ("Glenn  
Waddell Jr.") writes:
> 
> Lucas' approval, but the Zahn books are basically the same as the three
> Han Solo books, the three Lando Calrisian books, or the one Luke  
Skywalker

The what books?  Could you please e-mail me or post the info on these  
seven books that I've never heard of.  Thanx in advance....

--
--  "Who's the more foolish; the Fool, or the
--  Fool who follows him?"  
--            Obi-Wan Kenobi in "Star Wars"
---------------------------------------------------------
--  Chris Morton   mortoncp@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu
From: keithley@apple.com (Craig Keithley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Bladerunner Author
Date: 7 Apr 92 17:49:44 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.

In article <3h1gb89s@cck.coventry.ac.uk>, gdg019@cck.coventry.ac.uk (N Ridley McIntyre) writes:
> 
> 
> And get this...
> 
> The marvel comic book version actually makes up a short poem at the end to
> try and explain the title Blade Runner: Something about running on the
> edge or some other crap...
> 

I vaguely remember another book (not by Dick), that had a similar plotline.
That is, biological replicants struggling to be human.  In this book,
the replicants had serial numbers of some sort tatooed on their foreheads.
The problem with trying to be human was that they needed to remove the 
tatoo...  This required surgery, medical instruments, etc. The people
who supplied the illegal medical instruments were called "Bladerunners".
I've always thought that Scott got the term "Bladerunner" from that book.

Unfortunately I don't remember the title or author of the other book.  Oh well,
maybe someday I'll remember or find the book again.

I apologize if I've not got the other book's plotline exactly right, its
been 10 years since I read it.


Followup to rec.arts.sf.written, or rec.arts.sf-lovers?

Craig Keithley
keithley@apple.com
From: skitchen@pica.army.mil (D. Scott Kitchen (CCAC) <skitchen>)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Explosive Space Modulator
Date: 11 Apr 92 17:20:09 GMT
Organization: U.S. Army ARDEC, Dover NJ

In article <clive.702892815@mungarra> clive@mungarra.asis.unimelb.edu.au (Clive Newall) writes:
>Actually, the description is:
>
><Something> Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator
>            ^!!!
>

Time to fill in the <Something>...

Fortunately, I've seen both of the Martian episodes recently.  In the first
one, <Something> is Uranium.  In the second one, <Something> is Illudium.

At least, I think there are only two episodes with the Martian wanting to
blow up the Earth.  Are there more?


-- 
Scott Kitchen           | GM, Kitchen Sinkers       | ICBM: 40.88 N|
skitchen@pilot.njin.net | GM, Picatinny Mad Bombers |       74.56 W|
--------------------------------------------------------------------     
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: cleggp@aix.rpi.edu (Paul Jason Clegg)
Subject: Re: Could Batman beat the T-1000?
Keywords: Buford, pass me that extra straightjacket
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 18:46:56 GMT

In article <19944@castle.ed.ac.uk> asr@castle.ed.ac.uk (Angus "Fluffy" Rae) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Apr9.005014.22428@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>, egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes...
>"Oh goody! My Illidium Pew-36 Explosive Space Modulator"

Minor Point:  I think it was "Plutonium Pu-238 Explosive Space Modulator".
"Pu" is the abbreviation for Plutonium, and it has a 238 ion form. (Or whatever
it's called; I'm a compsci, not a chemeng!)

How about Robocop vs. Batman?  Both are heros/vigilantes...

...Paul

|FQT 1.10| They can send me to college, but they can't make me think!

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: twilson@alfred.carleton.ca (Tom Wilson)
Subject: Re: QUESTION: Theme from 2001: A Space Odyssey
Organization: Carleton University
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 17:09:15 GMT

Now, I thought it was The Berliner Philharmoniker doing the opening to
Also Sprach Zarathustra , but conducted by Karl Bohm, not von Karajan,
although the Blue Danube was done by von Karajan.

Tom
From: stevea@jab.tucson.az.us (Steve Albany)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Batman vs. your mother
Date: 14 Apr 92 05:14:34 GMT
Organization: Just Another Bbs. Tucson, AZ

moore7004@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:

> I guess the ultimate battle would be all the people who like x vs. x debates
> having to share a newsgroup with all the people who like cascading.  (If it
> ain't one thing, it's another....)
> 
> Scotto the umm...errr...
 
        Batman Vs. Your Mother!!!! Ahahahaha! That's too much.. 


        ================================================================
        |                    Capt. Steve E. Albany                     |
        |                 Cmdr. USS PATTON (NCC-8570)                  |
        |--------------------------------------------------------------|
        |                           | "My son, ask for thyself another |
        | SteveA@Coyote.Datalog.Com | kingdom, for that which I leave  |
        |  SteveA@Jab.Tucson.Az.Us  | is too small for thee.."         |
        |                           |    - King Phillip of Macedonia   |
        ================================================================
From: billoj@aix.rpi.edu (Jeremy Louis Billones)
Subject: Re: Could Batman beat the T-1000?
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 00:11:23 GMT

rauser@fraser.sfu.ca (Richard John Rauser) writes:
>    Could Batman beat the T-1000? Certainly in hand to hand combat Batman
>would be in trouble. But using his gadgets and weapons and his computers
>to perhaps figure out some weakness in the T-1000...perhaps he could beat
>the liquid metal monster!

>   Batman vs. the T-1000....who would win??

OK, let's get anal retentive.

In the recent comic series BATMAN vs PREDATOR, Batman "beat" a predator.
It was really more like "was still standing after a three day running
battle, when the mother ship landed and the predator fell on his sword."
So if I knew whether or not a T-1000 could beat a Predator, I could tell
you if Batman could.

Of course, Batman would devastate a T-800.

Jeremy Billones     billoj@rpi.edu  or  jbillone@jarthur.claremont.edu
"I'm hoping to see some lightning tonight, although the weatherman says
there's not going to be any rain."
	"Oh, there's going to be plenty of rain all right; wind, thunder,
lightning - it's going to be one hell of a storm."
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Could Batman beat the T-1000?
Keywords: Buford, pass me that extra straightjacket
Date: 10 Apr 92 03:28:15 GMT
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University

In article <1992Apr9.072413.4609@acsu.buffalo.edu> v562f9vy@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Wolverine) writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.005014.22428@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>, egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes...
>>In article <1992Apr9.000948.19138@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> ahawks@isis.cs.du.edu (andy) writes:
>>>
>>>Ob. sci-fi:
>>>Who would win:  Darth Vader or the alien guy in the Bugs Bunny cartoons?
>> 
>>Why, the Martian, of course!  He's got that disintergrating gun, after
>>all!
>
>
>Who would win?  Debbie Gibson or Tiffany?  Who's on First?
>
>                           Wolverine

Why, Debbie, of course!  Her nose will keep Tiffany at a distance, while
she rains blows on her opponent!
From: IQTI400@INDYCMS.IUPUI.EDU ("Slow-Children@Play")
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Blade Runner
Date: 15 Apr 92 15:18:02 GMT

USA Today; Wednesday, April 15, 1992:

'Blade Runner' returns...to video stores in a 10th anniversary
edition June 10 (New Line Cinema, $14.95).  Harison Ford, Edward
James Olmos, Sean Young and Daryl Hannah star in
the Ridley Scott futuristic film.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
From: tcw@kepler.unh.edu (Timothy C Webb)
Subject: Re: Why not Warrior Queen?
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 22:31:59 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.105344.5943@engage.pko.dec.com> boyajian@ruby.enet.dec.com (The fox so cunning and free) writes:
>In article <XCcoWo5Cu3Y@catzen.GUN.de>, scot@catzen.GUN.de (Scot W. Stevenson) writes...
>
>} Hmpf. I have heard a lot about the film "Warrior Queen," even seen it
>} quoted in other films, but my trusty Video Movie Guide (1990) is silent.
>
>That depends. If your "Video Movie Guide" only lists films available on
>video, then that's your answer. WARRIOR QUEEN was never (that I know of)
>released on video.

 As far as I know, it is actually out on video-- it's listed in my video guide.

>As for the film itself, I've seen it on one of the cable TV movie channels,
>and it's laughably bad. It's not porn, though it has Samantha Fox (the
>porn star, not the singer) in it, as well as some amount of nudity and

  Hey, if it has Samantha Fox in it, it can't be all bad. 
-- 
:::::::::::        ::::         ::::::   
 <<<<<<<<<<<      >>>>   >>>   >>>>>>    Tim Webb   tcw@kepler.unh.edu
     ????        ????  ?????  ?????    _________________________________
      ((((      (((( ((((((( (((((   
       ####    ########  #######       "The challenge is to chase the sound
        ||||  |||||||    ||||||      just to break away"   ---YES
From: mau@bilbo.cselt.stet.it (Maurizio Codogno)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: RHPS (SF-Lovers V17 #162)
Date: 14 Apr 92 12:19:04 GMT

> THE ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW is rated R for adult
> situations, explicit language, adult humor, and brief female nudity.
What do you mean for "brief female nudity"? The only thing I saw (by using slow
reply) was a nipple during _Rose tint my world_ scene, and I think it was a
mistake (Columbia has not a huge breast). Or maybe my edition (I bought it
in UK, and this is simply rated "over 14") is somewhat cut?

> I found ROCKY to be a truly original film.
silly, for a film which is a continue quotation of cheap 50s SF movies (indeed,
the start song was originally intended to be played on a collage of scenes from
the movies it refers to - the lips came later).

ciao! .mau.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.movies