HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tessmann@cs.ubc.ca (Markus Tessmann)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 vs DOS
Date: 11 Dec 1992 10:32:27 -0800
Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: larry.cs.ubc.ca
Keywords: OS/2

dba@most.EBay.Sun.COM (Michael Most) writes:

>I have just entered the pc world for the first time.
>Bought a 486/33 with 4RAM plus 200MB hard disk.
>The purpose of my machine will be to run children's
>software plus a C compiler for Dad.  I have an unopened
>OS/2 2.0 package.  Is there a good reason that I should
>opt for the standard DOS 5.0 with Windows 3.1 on top
>(as my neighbors have)?  If I do go with OS/2, will all
>the software running under DOS be compatible?
>Any opinions, suggestions will be very much appreciated.
>Thanks!

I think the deciding factor for you here is that OS2 will not run very well
with only 4meg RAM.  I know this from experience.  

I suggest you start with DOS 5 and run windoze only if you have to.  Starting
with DOS is also the best way towards running OS2 as then you can set your
system up for dual boot, allowing you to boot either OS2 or DOS to satisfy all
your compatibility needs.

Good luck!
		Markus
From: mic@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Marc Clarke)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 00:37:50 GMT
Subject: Re: Deskjet 550 faster than Deskjet Plus in Win3.1?
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Ft. Collins, CO
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc

Check HP's Peripherals forum on CompuServe for the latest
announcements about HP's policy for upgrading 5** printers.
From: hillyer@rrc.chevron.com (Martin J. Hillyer,(510)242-3123)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Re: AMAZE DAILY PLANNER FOR WINDOWS
Date: 17 Dec 92 18:30:42 GMT
Reply-To: hillyer@rrc.chevron.com
Organization: Chevron, Richmond, California

In article 13430@dekalb.dc.peachnet.edu, mark@dekalb.dc.peachnet.edu (Mark Stephen Miller) writes:
>In article <1992Dec9.225352.9952@leland.Stanford.EDU> aelman@cs.stanford.edu writes:
>>kuby2u@aol.com writes:

----stuff deleted-----

>My experience was much like Adam's.  I received my Far Side mug no problems.
>I have however, received the upgrade to the 2.0 version of the planner.  IMHO,
>the 2.0 version is light years better than the original.  Amaze has also
>cleaned up the text on the cartoons so that it looks much better in SVGA modes.
>The total cost for the upgrade plus the 1993 Far Side cartoons was 34.95.
>(14.97 for version 2.0, 14.98 for the Far Side 1993, and 5.00 shipping)
>Try calling 1-800-395-1546 and asking for extension PC1.  They were very
>helpful to me both times I called.  (once to order and once to inquire about
>shipping date)
>Good Luck!!!

Yes, good luck indeed!  I ordered my upgrade to 2.0 over a month ago and still don't
heve it.

just another data point from a dissatisfied customer.

Martin
From: umnoor@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Nasir Ahmed Noor)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: SmartDrv vs HyperDisk  (disk cache)
Date: 21 Dec 92 03:48:52 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada


Could some please let me know that which HD cache program is better--
SmartDrv.exe or HyperDisk.exe?

Thanks,
--nasir
umnoor@ccu.umanitoba.ca
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: Miguel_Li@mindlink.bc.ca (Miguel Li)
Subject: Re: ALT-TAB from DOS box prob
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 20:29:16 GMT

John:

>ML>Would anybody be able to tell me why sometimes I cannot ALT-TAB
>ML>out from a DOS box in Windows after I install a TSR?  The only way
>ML>to switch tasks (and get back to Windows) is to "exit" the DOS box
>ML>when this happens.

>Maybe the TSR is capturing the keystroke, I've seen that before.

No, the TSR does not capture the keystroke, and in any case the Windows
System VM gets all keystrokes first and then passes them to the DOS Box.
Since no keys (such as ALT-TAB) are reserved in the DOS prompt PIF,
Windows should see and trap the ALT-TAB and switch tasks (which it does
before the TSR is loaded).


>ML>It seems that Windows is seeing the ALT-TAB, but for whatever reason
>ML>it is not allowing task switching.

>What makes you think Windows is seeing the keystroke?

After trying to ALT-TAB out of the DOS Box task, and I then exit from the
DOS Box, I end up being switched to the next task instead of ending up in
Program Manager.  So Windows must have buffered the ALT-TAB, and not used
it until I exited the DOS Box.

Miguel.

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: th9708@meibm8.cen.uiuc.edu (Todd Lee Henderson)
Subject: Re: Deskjet 550 faster than Deskjet Plus in Win3.1?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:56:28 GMT
Keywords: HP deskjet ms-windows

rkeel@fnugget.intel.com (William R Keel) writes:

>In article <1992Dec16.061611.13847@cs.uoregon.edu> akm@atlantix.cs.uoregon.edu (Anant Kartik Mithal) writes:
>>In article <syny.724448371@crux1.cit.cornell.edu> syny@crux3.cit.cornell.edu (R Craig Stevenson) writes:
>>>I am contemplating upgrading from a Deskjet Plus to a Deskjet 550C.
>>>
>>>The question is: is the deskjet 550 faster or better at printing
>>>non-color documents and graphics generated under windows 3.1?  I know
>>
>>I seem to recall that my DJ 500 was faster than my roommate's DJ Plus.
>>Roommate graduated (lucky stiff...) and moved away a while back, so I
>>can't compare now. Assuming that the DJ550C is at least as fast as the
>>DJ 500 in doing B&W, you should have a speed increase.


>The difference is how the black "color" is handled.  The DJ 500c mixed all of 
>it's colors to make black - this is good because people tend to use black most
>of all.  If the 500c had black as a "color" in the cartridge, you would be 
>replacing the whole thing only because the black color was out; The rest of
>the colors would not get spent.  The downside is the color black comes out 
>like a DARK navy blue...and (finally pertaining to this thread) is slower.

If you know that your file only contains black, the 500c is set up to allow
you to switch to an all black cartridge that gives you true black.  The only
time you get the sick black is when you must mix color and black.

>How much? I don't know.
>The 550c has two cartridge slots.  1 for black, the other for the color
>cartridge...the advantages are obvious.

I like the 550c much better because of this, although it has other advantages
also.

Todd


>Reed

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                              What?

>Internet: rkeel@fnugget.intel.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: froehle@pepper.ra.anl.gov (P Froehle RE/207/xxx 4882)
Subject: Re: ALT-TAB from DOS box problem
Organization: Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne IL
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 07:25:46 GMT

In article <18339@mindlink.bc.ca> Miguel_Li@mindlink.bc.ca (Miguel Li) writes:
>Hi,
>
>Would anybody be able to tell me why sometimes I cannot ALT-TAB
>out from a DOS box in Windows after I install a TSR?  The only way
>to switch tasks (and get back to Windows) is to "exit" the DOS box
>when this happens.
>
When you ALT-Tab in the dos box, you are telling windows it can swap that
session out of memory.  Luckily, windows knows it shouldn't do this with
the TSR active, so windows waits for you to terminate the box and therefore
the TSR, before doing the switch.

..paul ... phfroehle@anl.gov


Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: mheniff@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (mike)
Subject: Re: Deskjet 550 faster than Deskjet Plus in Win3.1?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:41:16 GMT

In article <syny.724448371@crux1.cit.cornell.edu> syny@crux3.cit.cornell.edu (R Craig Stevenson) writes:
>I am contemplating upgrading from a Deskjet Plus to a Deskjet 550C.
>Obviously, printing color will be *slower* than B&W.
>
>The question is: is the deskjet 550 faster or better at printing
>non-color documents and graphics generated under windows 3.1?  I know
>that the 550 has "scalable fonts support", but does it offer any
>improvement with TT or ATM fonts?  Does the 500 or 550 drivers offer
>any advantage over the Plus drivers?
>
>Apart for gaining color, are there any other aspects about the 550c
>that makes this printer a better deal than the Deskjet Plus?
>
I have a Deskjet 550 (not the color one) and have had no problem under
windows.  The text prints out much faster than any dot matrix I've seen
and in great quality too.  I sometimes have some problems with printing
out graphics with 300x300dpi (mainly its slow).  I also hear that with
the 550c you get less B&W pages for your ink cartridge (expensive!!).
Is that true?
 
 Mike

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: kaustell@viikki.Helsinki.FI (KIM OLAVI KAUSTELL (MATEK))
Subject: Re: Why do I see Kbytes instead of Mbytes ?
Organization: University of Helsinki, Fac.Agric.For.
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 08:37:54 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.083650.2064@tac.fi> tiok_sr@tac.fi (Seppo Routimo) writes:
...
>I use the Country-setting Finland and it works just fine. It defaults
>to 1000 separator space (1 234). The error in free memory comes when
>you delete the 1000 separator, there must be a 1000 separator to show
>the free memory right (then again it can any character or space).

>Seppo R

Hi, everybody, especially those, who enlightened me with personal email !

The solution to my problem was obviously and exactly the fact, that I had 
accidentally removed every sign for a 1000 separator. How very stupid of me. 
Now that I've put a space there, I can see my dearest megs again.

Enjoying the reunion, 

                        -= Kim Kaustell =-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
HELSINKI UNIVERSITY                     Tel.      +358+0+70851
Dept. Agric. Engineering                Fax.      +358+0+7085491
And Household Technology                Internet : Kim.Kaustell@Helsinki.Fi
Helsinki, Finland                       EARN     : KAUSTELL@FINUH
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: kebsch@neurotic.sni.de (Waldemar Kebsch)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: 1 printer and 2 PC's ...?
Date: 16 Dec 1992 07:59:07 GMT
Organization: Siemens Nixdorf Informationssysteme AG, Paderborn, Germany
NNTP-Posting-Host: neurotic.sto.pdb.sni.de


Hi,

[ Sorry for my bad English ]

I need a progam, that allows me to share a printer by two PC's.

That is my idea ...:

Both PC's are running WINDOWS-3.1. The Printer is connected to PC1/lpt1
and PC2/lpt1 should be connected to PC1/lpt2 (see picture below :-)


      +--------------+          +--------------+
      |      PC1     |          |      PC2     |
      |              |          |              |
      |  lpt1   lpt2 |          |  lpt1        |
      +---o------o---+          +---o----------+
	  |      |                  |
	  |      |                  |
	  |      +------------------+
	  |
     +----o----+
     | Printer |               lpt1/2 = parallel interface
     +---------+

The programm, which I need, should run on PC1 in background.
It should collect all data from lpt2. After a timeout period
(receiving no data for a configurable time) the program should
start a printout via WINDOWS-3.1 print manager.

Is there a (shareware) program availabe doing this?

Thanks, Waldemar
--
Waldemar Kebsch, c/o  SIEMENS NIXDORF Informationssysteme AG, STO SI 32,
			   W-4790 Paderborn, Federal Republik of Germany
Email (USA)  : kebsch.pad@sni-usa.com        |  Phone: (+49) 5251 835645
Email (World): kebsch.pad@sni.de             |  Fax  : (+49) 5251 835602
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: froehle@pepper.ra.anl.gov (P Froehle RE/207/xxx 4882)
Subject: Re: Mouse works in standard mode, but not enhanced
Organization: Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne IL
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:48:42 GMT

In article <818@blue.cis.pitt.edu> djbpitt+@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum) writes:
>I just upgraded from Windows 3.0 to 3.1, using a 386SX with 2MB RAM.
>Because I did not have any customization information I needed to save,
>and because I didn't have room on my disk to upgrade by writing over
>3.0, I erased all 3.0 files and did a complete new install.
>
>3.1 starts in standard mode, as is expected with my 2MB of RAM, and it
>works properly, except that I get an out-of-memory message when I try to
>use the Help feature. However, when I force it to start in enhanced mode
>(using the /3 switch), the mouse does not respond at all. This occurred
>after the Windows installation, after manually copying mouse.sys to
>c:\windows (where config.sys was looking for it) from installation Disk
>8, and after running the mouse setup routines on installation Disk 8
>from within Windows 3.0.
>
>How is it possible for the mouse to work properly in standard mode but
>not in enhanced mode? All modes worked properly in 3.0.
>

You need a new mouse driver for 3.1, contact your mouse vendor.

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: max@megatek.com (Max Elliot)
Subject: Re: WINFAX->WORD, how do I capture scrollable window contents? Help
Organization: Megatek Corporation, San Diego, California
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 20:50:12 GMT

From article <1gqi4kINNqlj@tamsun.tamu.edu>, by tpradeep@cs.tamu.edu (Pradeep K Tapadiya):
> Howdy friends,
> 
> I wish to move the fax image received by my fax/modem to a Word-For-
> Windows document.
> 
> Pradeep
> tpradeep@cs.tamu.edu

  You aren't going to get much using a bitmap inserted into a word doc.
  WINFAX Pro has an OCR extension that might get you what you need.
-Max

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: planius@hpmpi1.desy.de (P. Lanius)
Subject: Re: latex for windows
Organization: Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, Germany.
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 17:33:22 GMT

There is a beta-release of LaTeX for OS/2 2.0 at rusinfo.rus.uni-stuttgart.de.
But I have never heard of a LaTeX for windows version. The only reasonable
Windows part would be the previewer...

Cheers, Peter
--
                            ,,,,
                           /_  _\
                      ooo ( O  O ) ooo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(((~~~~~~~~~~)))~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Peter Lanius                      |  Well pretty much as I predicted, 
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrontron |       except that the Silly party won.
Hamburg, Germany                  |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
e-mail: planius@ips102.desy.de    |  e- --------> ? <-------- p+   at H1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|                \ 
9am :-B 1pm ;-| 5pm %-? 9pm :-)   |         this space intentionally left free 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: tchnd-au@garnet.berkeley.edu (Yuval Oren)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Dvorak driver for Windows?
Date: 19 Dec 1992 06:18:46 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu

Boy, typing with a Dvorak keyboard is tough. I've decided to switch to
a Dvorak keyboard (call me crazy). For those that don't know, the keys
are in a more "optimal" order. Anyway, I got a dos TSR that switches
the keyboard, but unfortunately Windows remaps it to a normal config.
I need something to let me change my key mapping to Dvorak style in
Windows. Can anybody help?

Yuval

P.S. this message took me more than 5 minutes to write! (whew!)
-- 
________________________________________________________________________
|Yuval Oren						               |
|yuval@ocf.berkeley.edu     				               |
| "One spoiled green bird is worth two cooks in the other grass broth."|
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: mark@ocsmd.ocs.com (Mark Wilson)
Subject: Re: Wierdness when installing a new driver!
Organization: Online Computer Systems, Inc.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:13:48 GMT

This may sound dumb, bu I had this same problem when I assumed the new drivers
were in the root of the new floppy; doing a DIR and locating them solved it,
although I had to remember to put the trailing backslash on the path!



John DeRose (cs108069@pandora.sdsu.edu) wrote:
: Thanks Microsoft for making me feel like a complete idiot!  When I go to install
: a new driver through the Control Panel (Apple ripoff!) it asks me to insert the
: disk with the driver or type the path.  I do this and it comes back with the same
: damn dialog!  I've tried every (?) combination of path, drive, etc. and it still
: treats me like a fool!  MS Word v2.0a install program does this to me too!
: 
: I'm really starting to miss my Mac IIcx...I't may not have calculated ask quickly,
: but I sure as hell didn't spend as much time trying to get the damn thing to work!
: --
: John DeRose				cs108069@pandora.sdsu.edu
: Computer Science Undergrad

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Wilson, Online Computer Systems.  1-800-922-9204 or 1-301-601-2215
(Try email address mark@wilson.ocs.com....)
This file .disclaims everything signed with my .signature, I .mean it!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: smadja@cs.columbia.edu (Frank Smadja)
Subject: latex for windows
Organization: Columbia University Department of Computer Science
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 15:42:54 GMT


Hi there:

I am looking for LATEX for windows if it exists, any hint? I looked at
garbo and cica without success.  


Thanks

Frank.
From: rww@mugwump.cl.msu.edu (Richard W. Wiggins)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Suppressing Control-D prepend on Postscrpt files
Keywords: control-d postscript
Date: 14 Dec 92 20:41:09 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University

Today I spend some time on the phone with a Microsoft support rep
dealing with various problems.  One was that the Control-D that's
prepended to Postscript files causes problems of various sorts.
I asked how to suppress it.  I was told to put a line 

 ControlD=0

in the statements defining my chosen printer in WIN.INI.  I did so
and there was no effect.  It occurs to me that I may have misspelled
ControlD; other permutations did no good, either.  Can someone tell
me the proper way to specify this?

Also, while I'm asking: Does anyone know if I can tell Windows to
fire up my PC's 'lpr' utility?  As is, I have to do this manually
after printing to a physical file.  I'd rather have Windows fire this
off to my chosen printer directly.

Thanks for any pointers you can provide.

/rich
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: hm@opus40.ix.de (Harald Milz)
Subject: Re: HP LaserJet 4
Organization: iX-Redaktion
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:37:11 GMT


|> 	This is solved easily, by simply buying a couple of 
|> 	1 meg SIMMS, or 1 4 megger.  Interestingly enough,
|> 	I believe that HP allows any combination of 1, 4 and
|> 	8 meg SIMMS, but I have not tried this.  

Those are PS2 SIMMs with 72 pads.

|> 	1) I *did* get the HPIV drivers via FTP, but I would not
|> 	recommend it.  Rather, use the LJIII drivers for the time 

There's only a beta version available presently. Even as a tester
I didn't get any newer version.

-- 
| iX           | Harald Milz        | email: hm@ix.de         |
| Multiuser    | Editor             | phone +49 511 547 47 66 |  
| Multitasking | Helstorfer Str. 7  | fax   +49 511 547 47 33 |
| Magazine     | D-3000 Hannover 61 |
From: rww@mugwump.cl.msu.edu (Richard W. Wiggins)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: Suppressing the Ctrl-D prepend on Postscript files
Date: 16 Dec 92 22:12:39 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University

Several folks gave advice on suppressing the damnable desire of
Windows to prepend a Ctrl-D to Postscript print files.  The advice was
to add to WIN.INI:	

[PostScript,LPT2]
ATM=placeholder
ctrld=0

[PostScript,COM1]
ATM=placeholder
ctrld=0

..and to add the 'ctrld=' wherever a printer or port was defined.
I did so, and the problem persists.  In my case, I'm printing to 
a file, not to a printer port.  So I added the assignment statement
anywhere that seemed remotely resident.  Still Windows slavishly adds
the Ctrl-D.  (And yes I did reboot...)

Any other suggestions?  Is it possible this doesn't work for prints to
user-specified file names?  Is it too much to ask for Microsoft to 
document this, or better yet provide a visible switch to turn it off?

/Rich Wiggins, Michigan State U
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: michael@jarthur.claremont.edu (Michael Elkins)
Subject: Windows startup screen displays 3.0 instead of 3.1
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 19:40:47 GMT

Can someone tell me where the startup screen (bitmap?) resides?  In the process
of intstalling my VGA drivers, the screen is the one for windows 3.0 instead of
3.1 like it really is.  It's not that big of a deal, but I don't understand
how this happened.

Thanks!

me
--
Michael Elkins					michael@jarthur.claremont.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
From: cs5059@albnyvms.bitnet
Subject: Re: Windows 3.0 --> 3.1
Reply-To: cs5059@albnyvms.bitnet
Organization: University of NY at Albany
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 22:24:13 GMT

In article <168BE933C.WKWINKEL@ibm.rz.uni-passau.de>, WKWINKEL@ibm.rz.uni-passau.de writes:
>In article <1992Dec14.230233.19525@sarah.albany.edu>
>cs5059@albnyvms.bitnet writes:
> 
>>
>>I have many shareware programs on my CD-ROM that when run
>>give me the error "made for previous windows version, may cause
>>unexpected results........"
>>Is there a way of converting these prgrms to be used w/ 3.1?
>>Or a way around to protect against these unexpected results.
>>Thanks I.A.
>>Larry

>Larry,
>are you sure those are programs written for 3.0 and not 2.x ?
>Regards,
>Olaf Winkelhake

No I'm not sure they are for 3.0 and not 2.x!
In fact I have no Idea WHY I assumed this.

Anyway, same question... Disregard the "3.0" part!
Thanks for pointing that out.
Larry

Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: syny@crux3.cit.cornell.edu (R Craig Stevenson)
Subject: Deskjet 550 faster than Deskjet Plus in Win3.1?
Keywords: HP deskjet ms-windows
Organization: Cornell Information Technologies
Date: 15 Dec 92 19:39:31 GMT

I am contemplating upgrading from a Deskjet Plus to a Deskjet 550C.
Obviously, printing color will be *slower* than B&W.

The question is: is the deskjet 550 faster or better at printing
non-color documents and graphics generated under windows 3.1?  I know
that the 550 has "scalable fonts support", but does it offer any
improvement with TT or ATM fonts?  Does the 500 or 550 drivers offer
any advantage over the Plus drivers?

Apart for gaining color, are there any other aspects about the 550c
that makes this printer a better deal than the Deskjet Plus?

Thanks,
Craig Stevenson
From: swisher@cs.utexas.edu (Janet M. Swisher)
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: SendPS-type utility for Windows?
Date: 17 Dec 1992 18:38:48 -0600
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: boogie.cs.utexas.edu

Is there some utility for Windows like SendPS on the Mac, which will
send a PostScript file to a Postscript printer?  I can accomplish this
by typing "copy filename.ps lpt2" at a DOS prompt, but it seems like
there's gotta be a better way.




-- 
Don't take life so serious ... it ain't *no how* permanent. -- Porkypine. 
Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc