From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Spineless michele is shitting in his pants
Date: 22 Jan 93 12:49:34 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

In article <35709@olympus.wustl.edu>, moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
> 
> Michele 'se la sta facendo addosso':
>    Literal translation:
>    "Michele is shitting in his pants"

Bullshit. On the meantime that you were posting I restarted 
the macho war.
> 
> But listen carefully to the Michele's Waterloo:
> 
> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it, raising the white flag, murmurs:
>>>
>>I am fucking serious, unfortunately. Moana did not want to 
>>deal with the fire, she was *really* angry, I am sure about 
>>that, I read it on her posts. 
> 
> Isn't this the topic of this group? You should be proud to having me angry!!

The problem is that if you get angry with me, I can't fuck 
you *anymore*. It is not worth it.
> 
[My old explanation about why I did not want to continue 
this war, deleted to save space]
> 
> I understand some things from what you're writing:
>    - what you wrote was just bullshit - this was absolutely clear.

Yes, and you took it seriously, eh?

>    - You are not able to fight with angry people - that is: you are spineless

WRONG. To avoid this conclusion, I restarted the war.

>    - now you are scared to stand the consequences of your flames -
>      that is: you are a loser.

WRONG again. See above.
> 
>>>Maybe I am macho (probably...)
> 
> Ah aaaaaaah! Now there is some doubt in your OWN statement ... it seems to me
> that you're no more sure if you are a real macho or a ball-less puppy ...

There are only extremes on your world? What I wrote means 
that I am not 100% macho.

> well, doesn't matter: we *know* which group you belong to.

Which one?
> 
>>I thought about that. No, my point is that the macho flame 
>>is terrible, you start kidding and always it ends that the 
>>people hate each other. And I don't like to see a woman 
>>angry with me only because I said bullshit. 
> 
> Oh, yes, michele! You played with fire and you burned yourself... is this 
> what you're saying? Do you realize that what you are stating is an
> ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE DECLARATION OF FLAMING-FAILURE??? You are APOLOGIZING!!!

No. no. I did not burn myself. I saw that I was really 
burning you. And since I love you, I couldn't.

> The master of flames, puah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am the King of Flames.
> 
> You know, Michele, I though that you, with your barbarian and primitive
> brain, at least were able to be a real *man* on the net. Instead you're
> bursting into tears for so little??? 

You change the definition of real man everyday. Let me know 
what is a real man for you.

>Not only you are soooo stupid, you are
> also sooo weak and spineless that I wouldn't give a shit for you!
> Go back to play with your rotten toys, junk!

Just a repetitive lame. You have to improove yourself to compete with 
me, baby.
> 
>>Dice Clay? The boxer? Ah, ok, now I remember. No, the "rape-
>>flame" was half a joke, I mean, it was a flame, a big 
>>one (a flame is not necessarily a joke). 
> 
> If *that bullshit* was a joke, you have the sense of humor of an elephant!

I SAID THAT IT WAS A *FLAME* IDIOT! Can you use your 
brainless head?!?

> Live and learn, Michele: here in alt.flame there are many people that
> know what the word *humor* means: you're not among them!! Why don't you
> take some lessons? They would be pleased to help you!

It is not alt.humor. It is alt.flame. I post flaming humor and I 
post flaming concepts. I respect the purpose of this 
newsgroup.
> 
>>Yes, maybe you are 
>>right. Maybe the problem is that I did put too much wood on the 
>>fire, without to care. 
> 
> And now you're trying to relieve your burns...

I wanted to save you. But since you don't want, sorry, 
you'll die.
> 
> You're one of them! And you were not saying what you were thinking because
> the verb 'to think' doesn't belong to your dictionary.

Another lame? Be creative, Moana. 
> 
>>Not in alt.flame. I do my game, I do not accept suggestions 
>>or advices, only flames.
> 
> But you've just demonstrated that you cannot stand the smallest of them!

Moanaaaa, I am still heeeere, you are WRONG!
 
> For your mental healty, Michele, go to post in some other group.

He, he, he, he... So you'll be safe, eh? NO! Now you have to 
die on the hell, baby. You wanted this.

> I suggest alt.losers, but also alt.spineless aor alt.wimps is fine
> for you. 

How do you know those groups? I did not. Probably you post 
over there...

>[and somebody around here can suggest you many other more colorful
> groups to spend the time with...]
> 
what about alt.fuck.Moana ?!?
> 
> Ta Ta For EVER.

To fuck you forever?!? Manco morto. What about when you'll 
be old (in few years) and ugly? I fuck only young pretty women. 
I am sorry. For a month or two it could be ok, but not an 
entire life. Even if you'll marry me. Our children will need a 
mother, but I need an attractive woman for fucking.
> 
> Moana.

	Michele


Newsgroups: alt.flame