HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kaufman@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Marc T. Kaufman)
Subject: Re: Hayes lawyers intimidate competition (was: Hayes Press Release)
Reply-To: kaufman@CS.Stanford.EDU
Organization: CS Department, Stanford University, California, USA
Date:  4 Jan 93 00:14:05 GMT

larry@gator.use.com (Larry Snyder) writes:

>What is the firmware release for the WB/3000 with Fax?  And, is Telebit
>shipping any software with this upgrade and or new modems with this
>feature?

My new Worldblazer says:
WorldBlazer - SA - Version LA7.01

it has Fax, so I assume Fax is being shipped.

-- 
Marc Kaufman (kaufman@CS.Stanford.EDU)

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: vic@cd.com (Vic Serbe)
Subject: Re: Supra v.32bis to USR 16.8k connection problem
Organization: Central Data Corp., Champaign, IL
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 17:11:21 GMT

In article <B8EA8586A0205640@albnyvms.BITNET> BH4884@ALBNYVMS.BITNET writes:
>
>        Having recently received a Supra v.32bis, I attempted to
>connect to a board using a USR 16.8k modem. After repeated attempts,
>all I could get was a 12.0k connect which gave only garbage. I've
>tried \n1, \n2, \n3, \n4. None seem to work. The Supra arrived with
>1.2-H ROMS. If the ROM needs to be upgraded (I believe that the
>USR 16.8k's are fairly new on the market?) how would I go about
>requesting a new set of ROMS? From Supra itself or from the
>Mail Order company? Do I need a new set of ROMS or is the connection
>problem a result of some other problem? (I'm using factory set &F1)
>
>Any help would be appreciated.
>Thanks,
>BH4884%ALBNYVMS.BITNET@UACSC2.ALBANY.EDU
>(Brian)

Sounds like you're having the same problem I've had with my Supra. It
seems to make a LOT of bad decisions about retraining and renegotiating
when you try to connect at lower speeds or if you connect at 14.4 and have
line noise. I believe its line quality monitoring routines are screwed up.
I've found that if I disable auto-retrain/line monitoring (%E0), I don't
have this problem any more. I found this out by using the link diags in my
USR DS/16.8K (the modem I was using to test with... REAL solid modem). The
USR doesn't request any retrains, but ends up granting a BUNCH (with many
block errors) and then (usually after a painful period of LD time) the
Supra dumps me. The same is true when I dial up another Supra with my
Supra. Retrains with errors out the wazoo until death do us part over LD
connects that aren't free of noise (I've found I have less problems with
my Supra if I select an AT&T line from home... you know, 10288.....).

--
Vic Serbe (vic@cd.com)
         _._
#####> -------
 //___/ /    "Make it so."
 ------*
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: thanatos@hyperion.wright.edu (Terry Chlebek)
Subject: Re: Could somebody tell me the quality of Boca modems?
Organization: Wright State University
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 15:13:08 GMT

carlos@carlos writes:

>In <05HowB1w165w@willard.UUCP> matttrem@willard.UUCP (Matthew Trembley) writes:

>>I a VERY good deal on a Boca modem recently for the same price as the 
>>other Zoom modem I found.  
>>The deal was a 14.4 Boca modem(internal) with all the kinds of 
>>compression and correction with speeds up to 57,600 for 220$.  Although 
>>it didn't say anything about it containing a UART(whatever that is, but I 
>>thought it might be important since it is talked about so much here. I 
>>read it all but... oh well...).

>Briefly... 

>The BOCA has a 16550 installed on the internal version.

This is not correct.  The internal boca doesn't have ANY UART installed.
It EMULATES only the 16450.  I have one and it can't reliably transfer
at 14.4k in Windows 3.1 if you try to do anything else while the
transfer is occuring.

> 
>It's a quirky modem based on the Rockwell chipset. Try to purchase
>one with ROM version 1.27 ( or contact BOCA for a freebie upgrade)
> 
>It works well with most comm programs, but is flaky with certain
>fax programs, (namely ECLIPSE FAX), and won't connect to certain
>v.32 modems (mainly older ZOOM's)
> 
>Caveat Emptor! ( Latin for... Buyer Beware!)

Definitely!  If I had it to do over I'd spend the extra bucks and get a
ZyXel or USR.
> 
>Hope this helps..

>-- 
>  ___ ___  __   .   ___  __  //  Carlos Dominguez, MS-DOS Enthusiast !
> /   /__/ /_ ) /   /  / /_  // | carlos@infoserv.com  carlos@dorsai.com
>(__ (  / /  \ (__ (__/ __/ ..  | carlos@phantom.com   FIDONET 1:278/706
>                                 
-- 
Terry Chlebek
thanatos@hyperion.wright.edu
From: carlos@carlos
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Could somebody tell me the quality of Boca modems?
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 93 18:52:45 -0500
Reply-To: carlos@infoserv.com
Organization: Dominguez UseNet, Brooklyn NY, USA

In <05HowB1w165w@willard.UUCP> matttrem@willard.UUCP (Matthew Trembley) writes:

>I a VERY good deal on a Boca modem recently for the same price as the 
>other Zoom modem I found.  
>The deal was a 14.4 Boca modem(internal) with all the kinds of 
>compression and correction with speeds up to 57,600 for 220$.  Although 
>it didn't say anything about it containing a UART(whatever that is, but I 
>thought it might be important since it is talked about so much here. I 
>read it all but... oh well...).

Briefly... 

The BOCA has a 16550 installed on the internal version.
 
It's a quirky modem based on the Rockwell chipset. Try to purchase
one with ROM version 1.27 ( or contact BOCA for a freebie upgrade)
 
It works well with most comm programs, but is flaky with certain
fax programs, (namely ECLIPSE FAX), and won't connect to certain
v.32 modems (mainly older ZOOM's)
 
Caveat Emptor! ( Latin for... Buyer Beware!)
 
Hope this helps..

-- 
  ___ ___  __   .   ___  __  //  Carlos Dominguez, MS-DOS Enthusiast !
 /   /__/ /_ ) /   /  / /_  // | carlos@infoserv.com  carlos@dorsai.com
(__ (  / /  \ (__ (__/ __/ ..  | carlos@phantom.com   FIDONET 1:278/706
From: isc10192@nusunix1.nus.sg (KOH KHANG WEE)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: winfax pro 3.0 cover sheet problems
Date: 29 Dec 92 01:39:42 GMT
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]


	Hi !
	Anyone using winfax pro 3.0 ? I've been having some problems
when trying to send the coversheet... the rasterising takes almost
forever on my 486Dx/33 8mb ram.... the OCR thing will always say there
is not enuff memory to do anything.... this is shitty.... is there a
patch ?
	regardS
--
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	Jerry Koh 	a.k.a. 		FLAT^^TOP
		 isc10192@nusunix.nus.sg
	     national university of singapore
	     D.     I. 	    S.	    C.	   S.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Have I been hosed?
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 17:16:28 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

rob@sound.demon.co.uk (Robert J Barth) writes:

> My understanding is that the 'F' stands for 'Fix' as in 'bugFix' !!!

   I had heard that it stood for "FAST", as in higher operating speeds.  I 
don't know which is true, but I present one fact and one observation:

FACT: When NS discovered a bug in the 16550, the 'fixed' version was called 
the 16550A, not the 16550F.  This does not lead me to believe that National is 
likely to use "F" to indicate 'fixed'.

OBSERVATION: I have never observed any bugs in NS16550AN chips operating in 
interrupt mode.

   There may have been fixes to DMA mode, but you'd need special hardware and 
software to take advantage of this 16550 mode, so it wouldn't affect 99.9% of 
users in this forum. 

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
From: dennistn@coral.bucknell.edu (Jim Denniston)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Prodigy Eagle Modem (Retraction)
Date: 1 Jan 1993 14:28:57 -0500
Organization: Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA, USA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: coral.bucknell.edu

I'm interested in buying the Prodigy Eagle Modem, but Prodigy is extremely
vague on it's specs.  What are they?  Is it also V42bis or not, what speed is
the Fax.  And finally how does it compare to other 14.4 modems.  It seems like
to good of a deal to be true, especially coming from prodigy.

Any help and guidance would be appreciated.

							Jim

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: aki <aki@akidamme-233324.worldbank.org>
Subject: Re: ARRRRGGGHH!!! I CANT BELIEVE THIS!!!
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A76736A560022631@akidamme-233324.worldbank.org>
X-Xxdate: Wed, 30 Dec 92 16:21:09 GMT
Organization: The World Bank
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d11
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 16:23:51 GMT

In article <1992Dec29.225243.20846@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com>
TheLrdLovsAHngn, scottb@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com writes:
>I dont have any info that might help at the moment, but was wondering,
what is
>a CCL?
>-- 


Communications Command Language...or something to that effect..

BTW in my orig post I said Toshiba LanRover..it should of read
Shiva LanRover...it was a long week on a short temper ..sorry..




-Aki
The Worldbank Wash. D.C.
E-mail: aki@akidamme-233324.worldbank.org
(202)458-1112
DoD 0628
PBA 2294
*************************************
"How come the best bowling ball for
me is always the one I don't own?"
*************************************
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: modems needed
From: cschk@lux.latrobe.edu.au (............)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 10:01:04 GMT
Organization: La Trobe University

looking for good priced 14.4k BPS modems or faster..........
if u happen to know of a good deal please drop me a line..........
From: st1r8@elroy.uh.edu (Guillot, Burt J.)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Need info/experiences with Digicom Scout and AT&T Dataport
Date: 31 Dec 1992 10:23 CST
Organization: University of Houston
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: elroy.uh.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

I'm considering buying another modem.  I was considering a ZyXel, but their
prices have just gone way too high.  So, I've seen the latest sysop deal
prices on the AT&T Dataport and they seem reasonable.  So, has anyone
tried this modem and how is it?  Also, how do people like their Digicoms?
I hear there is a Wolfgang selling the external 14.4Ks with FAX here on
Internet for a good price.  Was it $199 or $249, I can't remember?
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Friday, 25 Dec 1992 14:31:42 MST
From: <CXKPV@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Dip switches for Okidata Okitel 2400 Plus

Does anyone have a description kof the the dip swwitches on the back of this mo
dem.   I got the modem without the manual.   Please email your response, I will
 Summarize.



Internet: cxkpv@asuvm.inre.edu
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:18839 biz.comp.telebit:1105
From: mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
Subject: Re: Hayes lawyers intimidate competition (was: Hayes Press Release)
Date: 3 Jan 1993 14:55:03 -0500
Organization: The Programmers' Pit Stop, Ann Arbor MI
NNTP-Posting-Host: mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us

In article <C0A7sD.GvC@gator.use.com> larry@gator.use.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>What is the firmware release for the WB/3000 with Fax?  And, is Telebit
>shipping any software with this upgrade and or new modems with this
>feature?

The ROM release is 7.01, I believe.  I don't think Telebit is shipping
any software with the upgrade.  All of this is heresay, of course; I
don't even own a T3000 or WB and so won't be getting the FAX upgrade
for same anytime soon.

-- 
Marc Unangst, N8VRH         | "Of course, in order to understand this you
mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us   |  have to remember that the nucleus of the atom
                            |  is squishy."
                            |    -W. Scheider, from a Physics lecture
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,alt.fax,comp.dcom.fax,alt.sources.wanted
From: Frank.Moehle@arbi.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de (Frank Moehle)
Subject: Re: FAX modem send/rec source code
Organization: University of Oldenburg, Germany
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 14:36:47 GMT

I forgot one question :

Where can i get the CCITT recommendations for fax ?
(called T.4, T.6, T.30) ??

regards,
	  Frank
-- 
============================================================================
	     CS Student                                   | I may be late,
Real       : Frank Moehle,  2900 Oldenburg, west germany  | but I'm worth
Inhouse    : faramir!moesel                               | waiting for.
UUCP       : moehle@uniol                                 +-----------------
DOMAIN     : Frank.Moehle@arbi.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de
------------------------------>Fascinating.<--------------------------------
****              It`s how you DO it, not how you don't.                ****
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: wolfgang@netcom.com (Wolfgang Henke)
Subject: Re: Digicom Scout modem
Organization: Netcom
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 00:57:33 GMT

Dave McLane (davidg@aegis.or.jp) wrote:
: The manual says that *G0 disables the adaptive handshake, so I got
: the feeling that it would either make the CONNECT at the max speed
: or give up. But mabye not, could you explain the difference between
: *G0 and *G1 in some detail? 

The manual is not completely correct in this respect. Try connecting
with *G0 on a bad line, with lets say signal quality 4 to 5. Most
likely it will result in a connection, but at maybe 12,000 bps or so.
Compared with *G1 (the default setting) *G0 will raise the threshold
before a lower speed is negotiated in the initial handshake, but not
completely disable the adaptive handshake. Most users, I estimate
maybe 95% dont need *G0 from what I can tell. For about a dozen or
so users I know it makes a big difference since it results in 14,400
bps connects where the default *G1 connected lower. 

I dont usually recommend *G0. Only if I get a report that the Scout+
will not connect at 14,400 bps somewhere, and the signal quality is
5+ or better, will it work well. If its 5 or below, then it will result
in higher speeds, like 12,000 bps instead of 9600 bps, but the line
does then not allow 14,400 bps.

All this is done with *Q1 by the way. Changing the signal quality
action to other settings opens another dimension. 



-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
   Wolfgang Henke     Data lanes not car pool lanes      wolfgang@netcom.com 

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: jeroenp@rulfc1.LeidenUniv.nl (Jeroen W. Pluimers)
Subject: Re: ZyXEL as answering machine ? (PC-Software)
Organization: Dept. FMC, Gorlaeus Labs, Leiden University, The Netherlands
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 16:47:19 GMT

In article <725721359.AA00000@zerebrm.isnet.sub.org> koljawk@zerebrm.isnet.sub.org (Kolja Waschk) writes:
>
> > So, am i right that I conclude that I can buy a ZyXEL as a sort
> > of modem/FAX/answering machine combination?
>
>I have a ZyXEL E+ with 5.04RP ROMs here working more or less as a
>combined voice/data/fax answering machine.
>Voice and Fax works fine, but the way I tried to adapt the
>recognition of a calling modem (->mailbox) doesn't work as I want
>it to... (Mailbox/Fax also works fine, it's just the Voice/Mailbox
>combination that makes me *#!@)

Oh well, Voice/Fax would be great for a start!

>The software I use is something self-written, called ZUTIL. It's

OK, I'll try to get it from those fidonet sites.


BTW: What are the pro's and contra's of the 4 different modem types?
If my memory serves me right, ther are E, E+, S and S+ types.
I'd like a good recommendation on which to buy (and where to buy
it in The Netherlands or Germany).

--
jeroen                             voice: +31-2522-20908 (19:00-23:00 UTC)
                                   snail: P.O. Box 266
jeroenp@rulfc1.LeidenUniv.nl              2170 AG Sassenheim
jeroen_pluimers@f256.n281.z2.fidonet.org  The Netherlands
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: camirkin@athena.mit.edu (Mario Lazzarin)
Subject: Re: Could somebody tell me the quality of Zoom Modems?
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 02:47:29 GMT

In article <oweewB1w165w@willard.UUCP> matttrem@willard.UUCP (Matthew Trembley) writes:
>I'm thinking of upgrading to a 14.4 Zoom modem with all the kinds of 
>compression and correction(internal).  It also faxes.  It says that it
>has 16550 UART and speeds up to 57,600 bps.
>It is for sale for $219.  
Hi, is it sold by a national chain store or through a mail order house?
Regards, Mario Lazzarin




Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael Rosen)
Subject: Re: Uploading to Internet (was Re: PPI modems...)
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 16:23:00 GMT

clau@acs.ucalgary.ca (Christopher Lau) writes:

>If you can't get your terminal server to go into a transparent mode and you're
>using zmodem, try it with the -e flag-  this tells it to quote all control
>characters so they don't interfere with the terminal server.  This almost
>always works (unless the terminal server escape code is alpha-numeric
>eg:  "\server" or something similar), but unfortunately reduces your throughput
>by about 12-13% (assuming a flat distribution- 31 ctrl chars/256 possible ascii
>codes).  Protocols like Kermit always quote control chars, and therefore work
>under almost any conditions, but since most are not streaming protocols, their
>effective throughput leaves much to be desired.

How would you do this in either Procomm Plus for Windows or Telix?

Mike
--
Michael Rosen						"Time and space
Tau Epsilon Phi - George Washington University		 can be a bitch."
mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu					  -Quantum Leap
Michael.Rosen@bbs.oit.unc.edu or @lambada.oit.unc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Subject: Re: Supra to Tbit hi-speed conn????
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 07:57:01 GMT

jay@gdx.UUCP (Jay Snyder) writes:
>
>  > From: larry@news.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
>  > 
>  > What is (are) the difference(s) between the Trailblazer and the T-Plus
>  > besides a black verse off-white case?
>  > 
>
>The Trailblazer's PEP works at 9600bps max.
>The Trailblazer Plus's PEP works at 18Kbps (now the WorldBlazer can do 28K).
>

That's not true, I'm afraid.  Both the TrailBlazer and TrailBlazer Plus
have a raw PEP bit rate of 18,031, and a data throughput of ~1440 cps.
This is with the latest version of TB firmware (AA3.01-AB3.00), and any
version of TB+ firmware.

As I mentioned in my followup, the primary difference between the two
modems when the TB+ was introduced was the data compression in PEP mode.
Otherwise, there ware *no* differences in the modems' PEP modes.

> 
>Also, with newer versions of firmare (5.00 and newer), the TB+
>can do V.42/V.42bis,MNP2,3,4,5.
>

MNP5 was introduced with BA5.00, but not V.42 or V.42bis.
They appeared in BC7.00.

-- 
:::::::::::::::::::  Greg Andrews  gerg@netcom.com  :::::::::::::::::::
ObGuindon:  The fad of throwing tofu, Japanese bean curd, at the
            ceilings of restaurants to see how long it will stick
            has really gotten out of hand in some cities.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: darylm@illian.mnet.com (Daryl V. McDaniel)
Subject: Re: Prodigy Eagle Modem (Retraction)
Summary: Prodigy's Eagle Modem is really V.32bis, I was wrong.
Organization: Micronetics - Aloha Research Group, Beaverton, Oregon USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 15:13:54 GMT

>Ed Ravin Says:
>>Daryl McDaniel Says:
>>>Ed Ravin Says:
> On comp.dcom.modems you write:
> 
>>>The Digicom Eagle modem being sold over the Prodigy service is a complete
>>>V.32bis/ V.42bis / fax modem.
>> ^^^^^^^
>>THIS IS NOT TRUE!  My wife received her Eagle modem last night.  It is
>>V.32, and NOT V.32bis.
> 
> I take it you tried calling a V.32 bis dialup and could only connect at
> 9600 bps?  Also, what is the ID on the modem  (ATI4, or something like
> that, prints out a ROM version and some other info...  I should know this
> but I don't have the Eagle on my desk anymore)

This posting is to clear up some misinformation I am responsible for.  My
appologies to the NET for the previous posting which made this one
necessary.

On December 22, my wife recieved her Eagle modem from Prodigy.  I installed
the modem and tested it by trying to connect to my employers V.32bis modem
pool.  When I was unsuccessful at this, I jumped to the conclusion that the
Eagle didn't support V.32bis.  Since the documentation and the modem face
plate seemed to agree with me I didn't explore further.

This resulted in my follow-up posting on December 23, to Ed Ravin, which is
quoted above.

Over the Christmas weekend, I played with the modem some more and verified
that it really is V.32bis.  I should have caught on when the modem began
talking to the (supplied) communications software at 38400 baud.

To make a long and embarassing story short, the V.32bis modems I was trying
to connect to were configured wrong and wouldn't allow V.32bis when
answering.  They have been corrected and the Eagle talks to them happily.

Even without the FAX capability, which I haven't tried yet, the Eagle
appears to be a good modem at a great price (Prodigy's special offer).

I can offer no excuses.  Jumping to a conclusion so rapidly, on so little
data, is not something I normally do.  Nor, do I hope to make a habit of
it.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Daryl V. McDaniel			(503) 643-6137
Micronetics			darylm@mnet.com
Aloha Research Group		...sun.com!nosun!illian!darylm
Beaverton, Oregon, USA		...{qiclab, sopwith, tessi}!illian!darylm

"SCIENCE: A way of finding things out and then making them work.
Science explains what is happening around us the whole time.
So does RELIGION, but science is better because it comes up with
more understandable excuses when it's wrong. There is a lot more
science than you think."
        From "A Scientific Encyclopedia for the Enquiring Young Nome"
        by Angelo de Haberdasheri (T. Pratchett).
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: lfahnoe@kegworks.mn.org (Larry Fahnoe)
Subject: Re: WB Fax Upgrade
Organization: The Kegworks, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 14:19:40 GMT

In article <87@ravel.ati.com> duncan@ravel.ati.com (Jim Duncan) writes:
>Over the weekend I plan to install the new parts, but the outstanding,
>overriding bummer in the whole project is that the (presently) required
>FAXIMUM software in the UNIX environment costs about $625 - they so
>graciously give you a 10% discount off the $695 regular price. This is
>very unacceptable.  

But the offer was for a hardware upgrade; none of the ads that I read said
anything about Telebit offering software, so I would chalk the coupon up
as a goodwill gesture.  Yes, that is a goodly sized chunk of change for the
software, but based on previous discussions in this group, there are other
packages available that will probably work. 

-- 
Larry Fahnoe                        Cellular One
612/832-7616                        7900 S. Xerxes Ave, Suite 301
lfahnoe@kegworks.mn.org             Minneapolis, MN  55431
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems