HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jeffb@gatecom.UUCP (Jeff Breitner)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: No murder of babies!
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 92 10:41:41 EDT
Organization: Gateway Communication Inc.


> In article <dlhanson.13@nap.amoco.com> dlhanson@nap.amoco.com (David L. Hanso
> 
> >Not anti-choice,  it is called anti-baby killing!  Tearing little babies
> >to bits or burning them to death in abortuary is not choice!  It is
> >an awful blot on this nation and its people.
> 
 
First off, you, like myself, do not carry the necessary "equipment"
to make an accurate decision about abortion.  I believe that should
reserved for women.  Second, abortion is not a topic which you can
pursuade a person into your camp.  The lines are thickly drawn.
Lastly, against abortion??  DON'T HAVE ONE!  I'm against smoking but
I don't advocate the abolition of tobacco.
 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: aiesec@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (AIESEC - Ohio State)
Subject: Re: POLL Bush vs. Clinton
Followup-To: POLL Bush vs. Clinton
Summary: Keep 'em coming
Keywords: yes
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 12:26:20 GMT

Hi folks.  Day 2 of the poll.  Once again Bush versus Clinton ONLY for reasons 
previously specified.  Many responses are not coming through, why, I don't know
but I still think I will have a significant result.  If you can't get through 
don't fret.  Just keep 'em coming. Thanks.

Ryan C. Scharfy
Buckeyestate dittohead
From: teve@ocf.berkeley.edu (Tom Tevendale)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Need help getting Rush's email address
Date: 12 Apr 1992 02:57:38 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: avalanche.berkeley.edu



	I am wondering if you have Rush's e-mail address on Compuserve. 
I would really appreciate it. Berkeley can be so much "fun" and I think
Rush would get a kick out of some of the stuff that happens here.





	Dittos,


	teve@ocf.berkeley.edu
	tom

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman)
Subject: Re: H. Ross Perot for President
Organization: Computer Science Department,  Stanford University.
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 21:04:46 GMT

In article <1992Apr1.125907.1@acad3.alaska.edu> fsdaw@acad3.alaska.edu writes:
>This makes no sense.  If we make it so that no one can contribiute more than
>$1000, then how on earth can the rich contribute more than the middle class? 
>The poor probably cannot afford $1000, so why not limit it to $100 and really
>even things out?

I don't have $10k to donate, but if I did, I could donate it to any
candidate, including Brown, regardless of any legal restrictions on
how much I was "allowed" to donate....  The details are obvious to
anyone who's ever read the campaign contributions restriction laws.

Contribution restrictions may "feel good", but to the extent that they
have any effect at all, they have an ADVERSE effect on campaign
funding because they don't affect the people you want to affect and do
affect those that you don't care about....

Even eliminating campaign contributions can't help.  (Think
"independent political speech" that just happens to be in support of a
particular candidate.)  Restrictions only make things worse, regardless
of their intent.

-andy
--
UUCP:    {arpa gateways, sun, decwrl, uunet, rutgers}!cs.stanford.edu!andy
ARPA:    andy@cs.stanford.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: edcrwfrd@unlv.edu (Edward Crawford)
Subject: Re: H. Ross Perot for President
Organization: UNLV
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 92 16:51:37 GMT

>
>	You obviously only read the first line of my rejoinder to your
>earlier criticism of my admittedly conservative views.
>
>	Look at the word "democracy":
>
>	"demos" = people
>	"-cracy","-crat", etc.  = rule
>	(the roots are Greek in origin, like democracy itself)
>  
>	Democracy means RULE by the citizenry.  Since we have expanded
>greatly our definition of citizenship (for the better) over the last
>200 years, democracy in America has come to mean rule by the majority.

Umm... The US never was and hopefully never will be a democracy... We
are a republic, which always was a representative form of government.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: I tried not to get into this......
Summary: Susan should have tried harder.
Organization: Rice University
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 22:22:30 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.180223.16118@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> sschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Susan E Schudt) writes, among other things:
>
>The point is the human-ness of the baby.  If one believes a child is human when
>in the womb, then killing it is murder.  I believe this, obviously.  In fact, I
>KNOW this to be FACT until someone proves otherwise.  ( It is impossible )  The
>point of my post is that if a child can survive outside the womb after only 5 
>monthes of pregnancy, it must be human.  So are we to draw the line here?  I 
>think the line should be drawn at conception, BUT if anyone believes that 
>human-ness begins at birth then they must consider the fact that a child has 
>been born after only 22 weeks of pregnancy and survived.  Thus, their "line" 
>must move from 9 months to 5, which will reduce the number of abortions by 
>almost half.  This idea of abortion on demand at any time during pregnancy is 
>wrong.  A woman has no "right" to this.
>I have had enough of this discussion so 'nuff said.

Moving your alleged "line" back to 22 weeks will cut the number of abortions
almost in half?  You need to replace those batteries in your calculator,
then -- two-thirds of all abortions are done *before 12 weeks*.  The figures
I remember indicate that disallowing abortion at 22 weeks would eliminate a
whopping two percent of abortions done in this country...so much for
pro-life "math".

>Susan E. Schudt
>Department of Chemical Engineering - Ohio State
>
>"When you're right, you're right!"

That's one thing you don't have to worry about.

-- 
Patrick L. Humphrey  (patrick@is.rice.edu)  Rice Networking & Computing Systems
  +1 713 528-3626 at Rice. 713 776-1541 at home. 713 527-4056 at Willy's Pub.
The U.S. Constitution isn't perfect -- but it's a hell of a lot better than
                            what we have now...
From: marc@milestn.UUCP (Marc Rassbach)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Retroactive abortion (Re: No murder of babies)
Keywords: abortion, rights, capital punishment, law & order
Date: 15 Apr 92 00:12:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: milestn.56
Reply-To: marc@milestn.UUCP (Marc Rassbach)
Organization: Milestone R/D Labs, Milw. WI

In article <12152@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> jagnow@al.weeg.uiowa.edu (Al Jagnow) writes:
>With all the fuss over abortion, I'm surprised that no one has suggested that  
>we legalize retroactive abortion - give the parents the option until the child  
>is 21 (or some other arbitrary age).  Give the kids a chance to prove  
>themselves.  If they turn out rotten, let the parents retroactively abort them.  
[Rest deleted...]

Let's take this one step further..... not only rotten kids, but stupid ones
too.  And ones who can't see well.  And who have thin enamel on their teeth.

We'd be on the way to the genetic superior race.  Hitler would be proud.

[There.  This thread has now followed UseNet law #3.  All threads, if 
carried long enough will compair or mention Hitler.]




-- 
Marc Rassbach       marcr@studsys.mu.edu       If you take my advice, that
MS-DOS - it's not   marc@milestn.mil.wi.us    is your problem, not mine!
my problem!     If it was said on UseNet, it must be true.
   Unix - It's a nice place to live, but you don't want to visit there.
From: snyder3338@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Rush on Donahue
Date: 14 Apr 92 23:09:35 -0500
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

Well, so much for that I missed the Donahue show today.  Does anyone know if
Donahue sells tapes of past performances as some shows do????  And if so does
anyone have an address or phone number...  Or better yet can someone who
watched it tell me what went on and if it is that good to go to the expense of
attempting to get a tape.... Thanks..

Dittos - 

Jeff Snyder

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: em@nynexst.com (Edward Man)
Subject: Re: Liberal/Conservative labels (Was: Re: October Surmise)
Organization: Nynex Science and Technology
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 14:19:26 GMT

In article <VgBwiB1w164w@batpad.lgb.CA.US> mike@batpad.lgb.CA.US (Mike Batchelor) writes:
>This is one of my biggest gripes about Limbaugh.  He consistently
>applies an Americanized spin to these terms.  He should have paid more
>attention in PoliSci 101.

How would you know he didn't? Had it ever occurred to you that
you were the one who didn't pay attention, i.e., Limbaugh is right
and you are left/wrong? Please look at both sides of the street
before you cross.

---
Ed
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Bryan Schroeder
Subject: Rush stations in St. Louis/Southern Illinois; trading cards
Organization: U of ILL
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 19:08:18 GMT

That says it. Are there any stations serving Southern Illinois that carry Rush?
Any St. Louis stations are close enough.

The nearest one I know of won't reach down there. It is the one I listen to,
WUFI-AM 1460 in Champaign-Urbana-Rantoul in East-Central Illinois. Might as
well add it to the list.

I would have to also say that the Feminazi trading card commercial is one of,
if not THE best commercial I have ever heard any where. Could someone tape it
and post a transcript of it? I am at work during his show and can't tape it
myself.
From: v026ltr5@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Monty)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: I tried not to get into this......
Date: 13 Apr 92 14:01:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr13.034735.12042@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>,
sschudt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Susan E Schudt) writes...
>Just wondering if it matters to all you abortionists that in 1972 a child was 
>born after 22 weeks of pregnancy.  He is alive and well today.

When have facts ever mattered to the pro-choice crowd?

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
{       Jerry Brown for President          | Matthew P. Mason        }
{           TAKE BACK AMERICA!             | SUNY Buffalo Law School }
{             1-800-426-1112               | v026ltr5@ubvms.bitnet   }
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: jheath@CERIS.Purdue.EDU (Jim Heath)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Poll John Gotti vs. Bill Clinton
Date: 9 Apr 92 21:52:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: CERIS.1992Apr9.215230.18768
Distribution: usa
Organization: Center for Environmental and Regulatory Information Systems, Purdue University

From article <1992Apr9.050051.28745@zia.aoc.nrao.edu>, by gmartin@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (George Martin):
> In article <1992Apr8.213123.8157@CERIS.Purdue.EDU> jheath@CERIS.Purdue.EDU (Jim Heath) writes:
>>
>>Speaking of polls, WLS in Chicago ran a poll with the "dapper
>>don" vs Clinton yesterday.  Gotti won by about 9 to 1.  Guess the
>>respondents are tired of the lesser of two evils ;-{).
> 
> Or just name recognition maybe?  Did they do Gotti against Bush?
>

Ah, but the IL primary was a week or two ago.  Clinton should
have as much name recognition as Gotti by now.

Vote for Cthulu!  Don't take the lesser of 2 evils ;-{). 
-- 
"Land of song, said the warrior bard,           Jim Heath
Though all the world betrays thee.
One sword, at least, thy rights shall guard, (The Minstrel Boy)
One faithful harp will praise thee."         (Thomas More)
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: What the joke about Rio Linda
Date: 17 Apr 92 02:39:43 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <1992Apr16.222852.10159@news.unomaha.edu> SCHLEGEL@Zeus.unomaha.edu (Mark) writes:
>
>What is the background of the comments Rush keeps making about Rio Linda,
>
>like,	"That's __________ for those of you in Rio Linda, California"
>
>Is this a town in CA from which he got a really stupid call?
>
Rio Linda is right next door to Sacramento, CA which is Rush's adopted 
home town, and where he lived for several years. On one of his videos he
talks about how every home there has a car in its front yard up on blocks,
and he shows footage that sure enough shows cars up on blocks. Evidently,
the town is the local joke - sort of like the way Burbank was on the 
old Laugh-in TV show.

-- 
John Switzer-Hoek          | "You hear it, you see it, 
(note yuppy hyphenation)   | you want to turn away, but 
74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | you CAN'T! It's Ren and Stimpy!"
jrs@netcom.com             | Happy, Happy, Happy, Joy, Joy, Joy!
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1500 alt.rush-limbaugh:1190
From: mykes@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG (Mike Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Unofficial Summary for Tuesday, April 7, 1992
Date: 15 Apr 92 03:00:00 GMT
Organization: Amiga makes it possible
X-NewsSoftware: Amiga GRn V1.29 4/10/92 (Beta) by Mike Schwartz

In article <!!yjwcd.jrs@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>In article <1992Apr14.082015.862@wam.umd.edu> herbert@wam.umd.edu (David Mark Herbert) writes:
>>>>
>>>>>Constitution does not provide any "right to an abortion," and in
>>>>>fact the founding fathers made a point about all citizens having
>>                                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>>the "right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Rush
>>>
>>
>>>
>>>"We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created
>>                                                    ^^^
>>>equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
>>>Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of
>>>Happiness...."  (p 454 of "The World Almanac", 1992)
>>>
>>>I guess you are right...I guess as long as the fetus is a Woman, it
>>>has no right to "Life".  And since a Woman carries the baby, and the
>>>Man doesn't, she is not bound by the Declaration of Independance or
>>>the Constitution.  Sorry.  I thought I had something there about
>>>everyone being guaranteed the right to "Life", but that is only
>>>extended to "Men" and not "Babies".  I'm sorry for wasting your time.
>>>
>>
>>When the founding fathers said all Men, they did not mean all members of 
>>Mankind. They truely meant all white men. It wasn't until this century that
>>everyone was endowed with those unalienable rights.  
>
>Wrong - read it again - the Declaration says that all men are endowed by
>their creator with these rights; these rights are not given by other men.
>And Thomas Jefferson certainly did mean all mankind with his reference; 
>he fought bitterly to keep lines referring to slavery in his Declaration;
>they were removed only when the Southern delegates threatened to withdraw
>from the Congress if the lines weren't removed. So don't confuse the 
>writings of Jefferson or any other founding father with the reality of 
>the politics of compromise.

Note:  The constitution is NOT the declaration of independance.  Clarence
Thomas got broiled for saying that there might be some cases where natural
law (i.e. stuff in the declaration) might be relevent.


--
Author of Amiga GRn, MailMinder, Budokan, Beyond Dark Castle, Dark Castle,
and Genesis Dick Tracy and Marble Madness.
Mike Schwartz  (ames!zorch!amiga0!mykes or mykes@amiga0.sf-bay.org)
1124 Fremont Ave.
Los Altos, CA 94024
From: dlhanson@nap.amoco.com (David L. Hanson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: No murder of babies!
Date: 9 Apr 92 17:14:08 GMT
Article-I.D.: nap.dlhanson.12
Organization: Process Control and Instrumention, Amoco Corporation

There should be severe laws, primarily aimed at the murdering doctors,	
against any and all abortions.  No exceptions for rape or incest,
possibly for the mother's health but only if the mother's life itself 
is endangered and even it that case the baby's life should be 
considered equal to the mother's.

The baby is a human life from the moment of conception.  Any taking of
that life is murder and is wrong.  God will judge the nation for this
grievous sin.  It may be too late for the nation as a whole to repent
and turn to God, but individuals still may do so before it is too late.

"For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through
Jesus Christ our Lord"  Romans 6:23

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

=========================================================================
David L. Hanson       Internet --> dlhanson@nap.amoco.com
Amoco Corporation     X.400    --> A=attmail,P=amoco,S=Hanson,G=David,I=L
PO Box 3011, MC B-1   Phone    --> (708)420-4391
Naperville, IL 60566
Any opinions expressed are my own!   "More security = less security"
==========================================================================
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Re: e-mail addr
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 16:29:41 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <00958DA0.50D1D3A0@Msu.oscs.montana.edu> iadmr@Msu.oscs.montana.edu writes:
>In article <167C4E676.JEZOR@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu>, JEZOR@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu writes:
>> 
>>Thanks.  I got it.  Please don't send it anymore.  I'll write, and if
>>it bounces back, I'll just send it again!  {Jonathan Ezor}
>
>
>PS If you have Compuserve Information manager and access Rush's forum, look 

>for Enos Slobodnik.  That's one of Rush's aliases.
You don't even have to look for his name, just do a read search (RS) on 
Rush's Email address; you can have any name that you want but your
Email address stays the same. 
-- 
John Switzer-Hoek          | "You hear it, you see it, 
(note yuppy hyphenation)   | you want to turn away, but 
74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | you CAN'T! It's Ren and Stimpy!"
jrs@netcom.com             | Happy, Happy, Happy, Joy, Joy, Joy!
From: monson@diablo.amd.com (Steve Monson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: RUSH LIMBAUGH FAN NEEDS INFO.
Date: 14 Apr 92 18:49:03 GMT
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Austin, TX

><IO20371@maine.maine.edu> and n352cb@tamuts.tamu.edu write:
>>
>>IF ANYONE CAN SEND ME SOME INFO ON HIS TV SHOW PLEASE DO SO!!!

Geez! Give us a break! What possible difference can it make to have
some "inside" information on his forthcoming TV show? IT ISN'T ON YET!!!
Do you think there will be no information on it as the time approaches?
And even if there isn't, there will surely be a listing in your TV guide.
WATCH THE SHOW when it comes on. Then you'll know all there is to know.
What a maroon.

Steve
-- monson@diablo.amd.com
	The tide gone out for good
	Thirty-one words for seaweed		"The Death of Irish"
	Whiten on the foreshore.		by Arden Carl Mathew
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: em@nynexst.com (Edward Man)
Subject: Re: I tried not to get into this......
Organization: Nynex Science and Technology
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 17:27:13 GMT

In article <1992Apr16.030241.27885@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>So, you want to save those 2% a year?  Are you gonna put your money where
>your mouth is and care for those 26,000 or so babies?  After all, their
>mothers didn't want them, so if you're willing to foot the bill for caring
>for all 26K of them, great.  But don't try forcing your decisions on me *or*
>my wife...or anyone else.

If she (and those who are anti-abortion) would support those babies,
would you plead guilty to "murder" of those women who were killed
due to the abortion procedure? After all, you supported it! I think
that's a fair trade. It's gotta be a two way street.

Since I am neither anti-abortion nor pro-abortion, let me ask one
question; maybe it can be a survey.

Would WE be talking/debating about Abortion THE WAY WE WERE if there
were not so many abortions every year? WHY? (No more than 30 words,
please.)

I am trying to get a better look at the problem/issue. Is this whole
fuss caused by ABUSE, or is it a REAL issue whether "people" are
practicing it or not.

---
Ed
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: mindbend@gatecom.UUCP (William Moyer)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: H. Ross Perot for President!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 23:08:12 EDT
Organization: Gateway Communication Inc.

jeffb@gatecom.UUCP (Jeff Breitner) writes:

> > 
> >      Larry King is 100 times better than Rush Limbo!!!!!!!!!!
>  
> yeah, but Larry King paints his hair and can't compare to Howard Stern.
> <evil grin>
>  
> 

Ouch!! Now I wouldn't go that far... I  Like King... But I Love Rush!
 
Bill
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1375 alt.rush-limbaugh:1088
From: KKRUEGER@Zeus.unomaha.edu (Kurt R. Krueger)
Subject: Re: Rush's Apology
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 18:50:19 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.11

In <1992Apr16.115706.26597@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> nathan writes:

>     Was anybody besides me surprised yesterday when Rush spent so much
> time explaining and apologizing for the Feminazi trading card commercial
> which was previously sponsored by "Ms. Carriage Enterprises"? I thought
> the entire segment was a real eye-opener and should be required
> listening for people who think that Rush never admits to being wrong on
> the air. 

I wasn't too surprised because a day or two before he apologized, a woman
called and said that "Ms. Carriage" was hurtful to many people.  Rush didn't
know quite how to respond, and he didn't want to really talk about it.  I
sensed that he was uncomfortable.
 
>     I'm not sure what to think about the precedent for pulling material 
> deemed to be offensive; certainly the remainder of the edited trading 
> card commercial is offensive to feminists but I doubt that the commercial 
> itself will be pulled. I guess the difference here is that Rush intended 
> to offend the feminists and doesn't feel bad about doing it, but he never
> really intended to offend the mothers of America.

This wasn't a precedent.  He also pulled the AIDS update because "there is
nothing funny about people dying," as he put it.  He pretty much so limits
his attacks to political groups, and that makes his actions far more defen-
sible.  It's OK to offend feminists because they have an offensive politi-
cal agenda that they want to impose on others.  It's generally not OK to
offend people who do not put themselves into the public eye deliberately.
Sometimes Rush breaks this rule (as do we all), but not usually.


--
/*  When I die, I hope it's in Chicago because at least I could still vote. */
/*        Kurt Krueger | kkrueger@zeus.unomaha.edu | kkrueger@unoma1        */
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: edanlx3@venus.lerc.nasa.gov (Wayne Harris)
Subject: Compuserve  
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Analex Corp.
Date: 13 Apr 1992 22:16 EDT  


Anyone know how to contact Rush through compuserve?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne Harris
Internet --  EDANLX3@VENUS.LERC.NASA.GOV     |        Semper 
FIDONET  --  WAYNE.HARRIS@OHIONT.FIDONET.ORG |           Fidelis
NASA Lewis Research Center   (216) 433-2067  |        
------------------------------------------------------------------------------