HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: A short metaphor for love
Date: 29 Jul 92 20:44:37 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <l7d5pdINNr8l@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>In article <1992Jul29.013845.22771@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
>>In article <l7bdquINN92v@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>>>I asked the baby for a kiss and she whapped me in the face with a block.
>>
>>Mommy said 'Owitch!', and baby kissed mommy on the cheek and said 'Dea, I made
>>it aww betta'.
>>
>>(Notice how the Boston accent enters in at an early age there)
>
>Just to correct this hideous slander before it affects anyones opinion of
>me.
>
|>I am not from Boston, I am from Ohio.  This means, among other things:
|>
|>a)  I do not push little old ladies down on the sidewalk to make the train
|>when there's going to be another train along in five minutes.
|>
|>b)  I do not behave as if I had a pickle up my rear end.

Uh, that's not a pickle.

|>c)  I DO NOT TALK LIKE ELMER FUDD.
|>
|>(Also, the baby only says mamamamamam.  

The baby was asking to be breast fed.  She just can't pronounce mammary yet.
Smart baby.

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
From: lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: OOOOHHHHH! My dear Emma, where art thou?
Date: 27 Jul 92 23:58:44 +1700
Organization: Lamar University - Beaumont

Ohhhhhhhh!  Emma, my dear Emma!  Where hast thou gonest????  I hopeth your
love slaves aren't doing you my rudeness!  I want to do it, instead!
I just have to asketh of you....

"Did they stay out of the elongated vegetable section in the produce market,
too?  Or did they purchase a resemblance of something for you? hehehehehe"

Enquiring minds wanna know!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNET:LAIRDPG@LUB001.LAMA.EDU                     |    PRACTICE SAFE HEX-
these views are my views and not my employers views! | USE A WRITE PROTECT TAB
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: kgorman@star-trek.bbn.com (Karen Gorman)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Net.Women
Keywords: good looking cute beautiful etc.
Date: 30 Jul 92 12:33:36 GMT
Reply-To: kgorman@BBN.COM (Karen Gorman)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: archive.bbn.com

In article <1992Jul30.083541.7337@zooid.guild.org> Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org> writes:

>blackp@med.umich.edu (Jeremy Thomas James) writes:
>>4th-I'm actually good looking ( so I've been told ) and was just
>>    bored at work hoping for such a compassionate answer.  ( I'm just one of
>>    those nice guys who females seem less attracted to. My 2 cents on why I'm
>>    here )


>sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
>>For a "nice guy" you certainly ask rude questions.


>mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor) writes:
>>Funny, I didn't see it as rude. 

>Ross@zooid.guild.org (Ross Ridge) writes:
>It may not be rude, but it's certainly very stupid.

>Mel writes:
>> I saw it as difficult to answer, since there is such a great number and
>> varity of definitions of attractive.

Ross writes:
>It's not difficult, it's just pointless.
>
>							Ross Ridge
>

What's the matter Ross...tough day at the office..not getting enough lately?
Chill out a bit...try a little pocket pool..it will do wonders for your
attitude.

Karen
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Friendly waiters
Date: 21 Jul 92 13:29:59 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <70188@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>
>So who here has been a waiter/waitress?

I've been both.

>Do you like chatting up customers, 
>or do you do it in order to get a tip, or do you not do it at all? Do you 
>develop a sense for which parties wanted to be chatted up?

You have to pay attention to the attitude at the particular table.
If people are involved in a deep conversation (like, if it's a couple
and one of them is crying or trying not to, etc.) you do your job, say as
little as possible, and leave them alone.  If there are kids and they 
start talking to you, talk to them (pleases the parents, bigger tip) and
be nice, bring extra napkins and whatever the restaurant gives out to
kids.

If it's restaurant that doesn't cater to kids, chances are the parents have
already figured that out and want to bo out of there as quickly as they
are wanted out.  Be nice. 

If it's a group people laughing and having fun, do the same.  In every case,
your money depends on your performance and how well it fits the occasion.

Oh, one hint:  If there are a bunch of obnoxious men gathered around
a table being rowdy, be sure their pitchers are full and their designated
driver has plenty of pop.  When it comes to tips, the drunker the better.  :-)

> Do you find it a
>good way to meet people?

Meet people, yes.  Make lasting friends, good God no.  I think you have
a smuch chance of that as you do meeting people at any place of work, really.

-Nance
-- 
Nance Colucci  *^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*^*  | Discussions welcomed. 
att!ihlpk!colucci                               | Trollers discouraged.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: More Scary Social Arrangement Questions
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 12:12:00 GMT

recently someone asked whether or not guys would
shag a fourteen year old. {Why he would want to
make a rug out of one is beyond me... }

But it brought to mind the time that I suddenly
came face to face with that 'change of lifestyles'
crisis that from time to time arrises. A friend of
mine and I were talking about our kids, and then I
learn that his daughter lived in my state, and that
she was in her early twenties....

So folks, Would You wish to go out with a person
in their twenties??????


ciao
drieux
From: grover.cs.unc.edu!martinc@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 22 Jul 92 19:46:00 GMT
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

I'd have to say certainly not: I'm not sure a 14 year old can really
consent, and I have hemerrhoids so a term in prison really doesn't
appeal to me.
--

Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mit der Dummheit kaempfen Goetter selbst vergebens. -- Schiller
Ergo bibamus! -- Goethe
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: droe@cs.tcd.ie (David Roe)
Subject: Re: She called, I came, she smiled, I slept
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin (Astrobiology)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 13:34:35 GMT

>>	Oh, be still my beating heart.......
>>
>>	May I please nominate this as the ultimate motto of all male
>>subscribers to soc.singles??? Does anyone second the motion? :>
>>
>>				Emma. :>
>>
>Ah Emma dear, why increase the perception that all women are selfish
>bitches?
>
>Personally I love the feel and sound of my lover coming........

	And this sound is???

	In my experience, nothing divides people into two camps like the
silent v. noisy orgasm division. It can lead to extreme problems or
satisfaction. My preference is for the noisy, but I tend to remain
totally silent myself. I suppose this reveals something deep and
meaninful but dont really care.

	Dave "Was that the cat?" Roe
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Those looooong and hard love sessions (was: Re: She called, I came, she smiled, I slept)
Date: 21 Jul 92 20:45:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: uwm.1992Jul21.204551.5268
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

In article <1992Jul21.092036.1@tesla.njit.edu> sjo2693@tesla.njit.edu writes:
>In article <1992Jul20.173849.12055@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>, ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels) writes:
>> mcregor@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Meloney Cregor) writes:
>>>I think the highest compliment I got in that respect was when he said,
>>>" wow, I almost passed out on that one."
>> 
>> Sure beats the heck out of "I especially liked it when you moved!"
>Know what you mean about passing out..been there...so was she

Now that we got the pleasure dimension all discussed out, here's a related
question this time on the temporal dimension:

         What's the longest you've ever spent (or ever wanted to spend)
         making love with someone?
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Fraternities (was: Re: E.W.- Average age of subscribers)
Date: 25 Jul 92 00:01:34 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Jul24.232017.9617@fid.morgan.com> sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
|In article <l6oufuINNphm@skat.usc.edu> tarra@skat.usc.edu (Frat Boy)
|writes:
|
|>  As far as the frat "twerps" went
|>how many of them did you call twerps to their face?
|
|Irrelevant complaint.
 
Don't go dismissing his comment so hastily.  This is the third or fourth 
time he's made a reference about getting physical based on someones comment
on the net.  There seems to be a trend towards pugilism on his part.  As
you've more or less indicated in your response his argumentative technique
primarily consists of ad hominum attacks, irrelevant rebuttals, isolated
examples, and basically just a whole lot of tap dancing.  Perhaps he should
spend more time studying an argumentation and debate text.  I've read several
and none of these techniques win debates.


-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius)
Subject: Re: topless
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 01:58:06 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <1992Jul21.152632.25118@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.ibm.com writes:
>In  <1992Jul20.181750.4849@zooid.guild.org>  Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org> writes:
>>
>> Considering that it's apparently now legal for women to go topless in
>> New York State, it would seem to be more fun to hold a Boink in New York,
>> topless-wise at least.
>
>What a coincidence - we just happen to be having a Boink in New York -
>the weekend of Aug. 1.

Thank you for making a clean breast of it.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Babbage's Birthday Bargain Bash -- December 26th, 1992
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: seeking higher ground
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 21 Jul 92 05:05:31 GMT

johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <2151@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com> luzenko@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com
>(Bill Luzenko) writes in an article that would have been much easier to read
>had he hit return a little more often:

And let me be the second to wish Bill many happy returns!

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Where Is alt.sex ?
Date: 21 Jul 92 23:51:23 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1992Jul17.151404.1@camins.camosun.bc.ca> comptec91065@camins.camosun.bc.ca writes:

>My node does not carry alt.sex or alt anything for that matter.
>I have FTP access or whatever that is that lets you log on to remote sites over
>the network. Do you know a way I can reroute myself to get alt.sex ?
>and/or can you give me an e-mail address that would get to alt.sex ?

Wow, Internet access way up at Camosun College.  How things have changed.
If North Island College in Campbell River gets an account, I want to see
that my mother gets access :-)

I have no practical help for you though, sorry.

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Heaven knows / No frontiers
And I've seen heaven in your eyes			- Jimmy McCarthy
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: shannah@netcom.com (Teri Miller)
Subject: Re: Drieux's hair is curlier (was: Re: Men with Long hair)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 21:26:50 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <1992Jul27.093753.29814@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins) writes:
>In article <1992Jul27.032342.27586@wetware.com> diana@wetware.com (CatWoman ) writes:
>>I don't even mind that my PYM's hair is curlier
>>than mine is - well, I don't mind TOO much...  :)
>
>Well?  What does he look like? :)

Rumor has it that he's drop-dead gorgeous.  I've only had a half-dozen
or so women tell me that.  Far be it from me to refute such a persistent
opinion.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: laku@vipunen.hut.fi (Lauri H Eklin)
Subject: Re: seeking higher ground
Reply-To: laku@vipunen.hut.fi (Lauri H Eklin)
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 11:14:49 GMT

In article <7LZgoB2w164w@depsych.Gwinnett.COM> dy@depsych.Gwinnett.COM (Dr. Yes) writes:

>
>What kind of "schools" do women go to?  Arts and crafts?  When you
>stop to think about it most classes that are _about_ something are
>attended mostly by males.

	Perhaps your underlining in word "about" means something
that I don't get but classes where you can meet girls... I am going
to attend a "summer university" french-course. I saw the list of
participants and noticed that I'm the only guy in the 24 -person
class. Too bad :-)  And really, honestly, I am in it for the
language. At least was, when I signed up...


Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: gds@oahu.cs.ucla.edu (Greg Skinner)
Subject: Re: A Dying Breed
Originator: gds@oahu.cs.ucla.edu
Reply-To: gds@cs.ucla.edu (Greg Skinner)
Organization: too funky
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 22:23:30 GMT

In article <14nkvlINN3ds@hp-sdd.sdd.hp.com> teri@sdd.hp.com (Teri Tracey) writes:
>I've seen people work all their life to live the good life "later" but
>found that it was not to be had, since you get caught in the rat race
>until you retire, at which point your spouse has divorced you, your kids
>have moved 2000 miles away, and the dog doesn't know who you are.
>Are you talking about people who become millionaires at age 35?  What about
>the rest of the hoi polloi?

>And you missed all the good times of your life working your ass off.
>You only live once...to me, there's more to life than getting ahead
>and making piles of money.  No one regrets on their deathbed that
>"they didn't work hard enough at ABC company."

This is a very debatable subject.  Some people feel it is more
important to work as hard as you can in the present to provide for
yourself in the future, because the future is not promised.  Take for
example, people who are forced to work past retirement age, because
they did not have enough combined in pension and savings to live off
of after they retired.  Other people feel it is better to work less
and enjoy yourself more in the present, as you have indicated.

There is a tradeoff but it can be very hard to accomplish.  Our
current economy does not provide us many options, besides working very
hard so we can save a lot of money, if we want to be homeowners,
child-raisers, business owners, etc.

--gregbo
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 31 Jul 92 04:01:50 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1992Jul29.123512.13436@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dut
ton) writes:

> You know I was gonna stay out of this, But, has anybody noticed
>some of those olympic gymnastic girls ain't have bad. Now the swimmers
>I wouldn't wanna meet in a dark alley.

I thought of this thread when I was watching Kim Zmeskal being the
comeback kid the other day and noticing all the announcers talking
about "the women".  It was a neat juxtaposition.  Some of them are
cute, all right, but I didn't really perk up until they showed a
piece with an interview with a now-30 Nadia Comanichi.  Montreal, eh?
At least they couldn't deny me entry :-)

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
The sun is gonna shine again / We're gonna make it 'round that bend
I'll walk another mile with you, 'cause you're my friend
The sun is gonna shine again.			- Graham Parker
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tyadav@athena.mit.edu (Tapesh Yadav)
Subject: Re: Morality- Alarming results
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 13:36:26 GMT

============================
 gswst@gl.pitt.edu (Gary S Wachs) writes:
>
> I read somewhere, can't remember where, about the results of a morality
>questionaire.  A few thousand adult males in an urban area were polled,
> 1. Have you ever seriously considered raping a woman?
>     the "Yes"'s were somewhere in the 10-15% area
> 2. Do you think you could ever actually rape a woman if you were
>    given assurance that you could not get caught?
>     the "Yes"'s skyrocketed to somewhere in the 50-70% area this time.
>Any ideas on what we can do about this?

 Arm all women with guns (RTBA) :)

 Or, as Dan Mocsny and me used to dream about the information
 revolution and its impact (yes, I worked with him for a year):
 Like phone beepers, have safety beepers. The victim can then
 choose to electronically call for help. The safety device could
 be integrated with watch or jewellery....
 Well then comes the privacy issue; and cases where a paranoid woman
 sends the Nice Guy (tm) to cops.... 

 The best solution, till above technology comes to your drug store,
 is with the "to be victim." Presence of mind and some precaution.
 Like the woman who escaped rape by warning the rapist that she has
 AIDS.

T.Y.
----
tyadav@athena.mit.edu
From: tarra@skat.usc.edu (Frat Boy)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Fraternities (was: Re: E.W.- Average age of subscribers)
Date: 28 Jul 1992 13:34:59 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: skat.usc.edu

In article <13734@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <1992Jul24.232017.9617@fid.morgan.com> sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart) writes:
>|In article <l6oufuINNphm@skat.usc.edu> tarra@skat.usc.edu (Frat Boy)
>|writes:
>|
>|>  As far as the frat "twerps" went
>|>how many of them did you call twerps to their face?
>|
>|Irrelevant complaint.
> 
>Don't go dismissing his comment so hastily.  This is the third or fourth 
>time he's made a reference about getting physical based on someones comment
>on the net.  There seems to be a trend towards pugilism on his part.  As
>you've more or less indicated in your response his argumentative technique
>primarily consists of ad hominum attacks, irrelevant rebuttals, isolated
>examples, and basically just a whole lot of tap dancing.  Perhaps he should
>spend more time studying an argumentation and debate text.  I've read several
>and none of these techniques win debates.
>
Well if you or that annoyance of a little geek Seth would ever read one of 
my posts without the attitude that "because you are both little nerds that
never were socially successful in life, that you must be smarter than someone
that goes to a good school known for its attractive women and wild parties"
than maybe you would both stop making ignorant comments about what you think
I'm saying and write about what is actually in my post.  I asked about the 
twerp comments to show just what kind of guy made the post.  He was probably
one of you guys hiding in a dorm room from girls that didn't frequent the
SUN labs making stupid comments about fraternities that in Seth's own words
he could know nothing about because he wasn't in one.  I am not threatening,
nor am I attempting to be so.  If you take my postings as such than perhaps 
it is your own insecurities that forces you to do so.  As far as your technique
of talking about me and not to me goes it is a little bit childish.  If you
however can feel good about yourselves by doing so by all means please continue
I know from your posts that your insignificant lives probably need all the 
little rays of sunshine they can get.  If you call this tap dancing than I 
guess I have to take off my hat and say "Ha Cha Cha Cha"

>-- 
>| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |


Tom
-- 
"Chicks dig me because I rarely wear underwear"  
					Bill Murray
From: Bonger
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 24 Jul 1992 16:27:21 GMT
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.89.16.47

In article <1992Jul24.154515.3091@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
(Marianna Max) writes:
>Ya know the weird thing is that even if they think its wrong, I bet most
>guys would at least be tempted by the allure of a pretty youngster (seems
>to also be true for some male homosexuals and 14 year old boys). I
>suspect that this "allure of youth" isn't something that attracts most
>women. A 14 year old boy, no matter how pretty, would simply be of no 
>sexual interest to me at all. So am I right ladies and gentlemen, is this 
>really a gender difference? 

Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but guys are supposed to reach their sexual peak
around 18, right, and also their sexual maturity (penis size), while girls are
developed before then, or at least ready to have intercourse, which is what
we're talking about here. So, yes, maybe a 14-year old boy couldn't satisfy
you, but a 14-year old girl might have all some people here need for
satisfaction. 

							#Bonger#
From: Eric_S_Klien@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Electronic Matchmaker
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 92 22:57:55 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: world

Women, I am about to launch a free electronic matching service on 
Usenet.  Unfortunately, more guys than gals have expressed an 
interest so far.  If you would like to see the fourth draft of my 
questionnaire so we can alter it to also fit women's needs as well as 
men's, either send me mail or look at the copy I posted in 
alt.personals.
 
This service is serious and I already have 161 men and 111 women 
signed up so far.  The site of the service has already been selected 
and programming has begun.
 
                                                           Eric Klien
Xref: sparky soc.singles:21019 soc.couples:3487