HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee)
Subject: Re: Continuity catalog part two
Organization: Johns Hopkins University CS Dept.
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 03:50:49 GMT

In article <01GOPP8XUW1E8WW3HM@kinni.acc.uwrf.edu> steven.k.manfred@UWRF.EDU writes:
>6.	"The Deadly Assassin"
>	problems will be discussed when we get to The Invasion of Time
>9.	"The Invasion of Time"
>	Problem:  Several Time Lord artefacts and the structure of Time
>	Lord society and the interior of the TARDIS were changed for
>	this story:

You missed a whopper, which I'd suggest adding to your list: The Doctor
has to leave behind Sarah before Deadly Assassin because he can't take
aliens to Gallifrey.  In Invasion of Time he takes Leela to Gallifrey.

The best explanation I've seen is that since the Doctor was trying to
act irrational in Invasion of Time, taking Leela there would just fit
in.  Unfortunately, this doesn't quite work; the Gallifreyans do not
react to Leela's presence as if it violated as big a rule as Deadly
Assassin implied.  (Actually, I don't remember any adverse reactions
at all, but it's been a while since I've seen the episode.)

>14.	"The Five Doctors"
>	Problem: Second Doctor should not be able to remember that
>	Jamie and Zoe shouldn't remember them, ...

Worse yet is another problem.  "If you were really Jamie and Zoe you
would not have remembered me" makes no sense at all!  For all the Doctor
knew, they were real, but taken from a point in time from before their
memories were wiped.  I mean, the Doctor himself was taken from before he
regenerated; why did he not consider the possibility that someone else
was taken from before some important event in their life?
--
"the bogosity in a field equals the bogosity imported from related areas, plus
the bogosity generated internally, minus the bogosity expelled or otherwise
disposed of."  -- K. Eric Drexler

Ken Arromdee (UUCP: ....!jhunix!arromdee; BITNET: arromdee@jhuvm;
     INTERNET: arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu)
From: wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Dave vs. Warren (was Re: The future? )
Date: 11 Sep 92 06:04:07 GMT
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando

This month is supposed to be "don't follow up to one of Dave's ideas" month.
At least one person has participated by e-mailing his flame-toward-Dave to me.
What are the rest of you doing? Results will go on display on Oct. 1. 8-)

Tom

"Of course, DSY will buy the books, the matching pot holders, the limited
edition collector's imitation china plates, and the commerative toenail
clippers...." -- an anonymous r.a.dw reader
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu (Greg Trotter)
Subject: Re: Continuity catalog part two
Originator: usenet@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 05:14:17 GMT
Organization: A Planet Of His Own

In article <1992Sep14.035049.12857@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes:
>In article <01GOPP8XUW1E8WW3HM@kinni.acc.uwrf.edu> steven.k.manfred@UWRF.EDU writes:
>>6.	"The Deadly Assassin"
>>	problems will be discussed when we get to The Invasion of Time
>>9.	"The Invasion of Time"
>>	Problem:  Several Time Lord artefacts and the structure of Time
>>	Lord society and the interior of the TARDIS were changed for
>>	this story:
>
>You missed a whopper, which I'd suggest adding to your list: The Doctor
>has to leave behind Sarah before Deadly Assassin because he can't take
>aliens to Gallifrey.  In Invasion of Time he takes Leela to Gallifrey.
>
>The best explanation I've seen is that since the Doctor was trying to
>act irrational in Invasion of Time, taking Leela there would just fit
>in.  Unfortunately, this doesn't quite work; the Gallifreyans do not
>react to Leela's presence as if it violated as big a rule as Deadly
>Assassin implied.  (Actually, I don't remember any adverse reactions
>at all, but it's been a while since I've seen the episode.)

Yet: in Invasion of Time, the Doctor makes a measured, calculated
decision to return to Gallifrey. In the Deadly Assassin (OK, end of
Hand of Fear), the Doctor receives a telepathic summons from Gallifrey,
and (I think) has a premonition of the assassination. He didn't really
know what he was getting himself into.

On yet another hand, if they did get into a scrap, Sarah would be hard
pressed to defend herself (unless a blood-curdling scream makes the
Master disintegrate ;-), while Leela is more capable of looking after
herself (and the Doctor).

Heck. *I* wouldn't have taken Sarah. But Leela... no prob.

					- greg
-- 
Greg Trotter
Norman, Oklahoma
Internet: greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu
Fidonet: 1:147/63       TrekNet: 87:6012/8009
Xref: sparky rec.arts.drwho:6042 alt.startrek.creative:1946
From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Face of Evil  (was Re: Immortal Companions)
Date: 10 Sep 92 21:24:00 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <1992Sep10.205847.17021@wam.umd.edu> mrmuon@next15pg2.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins) writes:
>In article <1992Sep10.144044.1@cc.newcastle.edu.au>  
>c8643631@cc.newcastle.edu.au (I AM NOT ON DRUGS. HONEST. I WAS BORN THIS  
>WAY.) writes:
>> According to Terrance Dicks in 'The Face Of Evil', the Doctor visited  
>the
>> Mordee expedition at some stage during the 'Robot' adventure. Now, since
>> Terrance wrote 'Robot' this seems a good way to have it. It's not canon  

>Of course Terrance didn't write "The Face of Evil" (script).
>The place where the Mordee adventure is supposed to fit in in "Robot" is  
>evidently the point where the Dr runs into the TARDIS and starts to  
>dematerialize, but rematerializes immediately and comes out again because  

Not explicitly.  The book does mention that immediately after his regeneration,
during that affair with the giant robot, the Doctor got bored, nipped off,
had a bunch of adventures, and came back in time for tea.  There is not
the slightest hint that this had to happen during the on-screen scenes.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bgrubb@dante.nmsu.edu (GRUBB)
Subject: Ghost Light Production Code
Organization: New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 13:25:36 GMT

greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu (Greg Trotter) wanted to know if Ghost Light
code was 7O or 7Q.  Well according to Jean-Marc Lofficier's "Doctor Who
The Program Guide" it is 7Q and in the Errata in Jean-Marc Lofficier's
"Doctor Who  The Terresrial Index" the sighting of the episode is 7Q as
it is in the front of the the DWTTI so the 7O is a misprint. Hope this helps.

"Eliminate the impossible and what ever remains, no matter how improble,
is the truth" -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle through Sherlock Holmes
From: rock@lakes.trenton.sc.us (rock)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: More Theories About the D
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 92 11:47:21 EDT
X-Maildoor: WaflineMail 1.00r

TW>From: wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson)
TW>Why does everyone search for explanations about the shows inconsistencie
TW>rather than accept that the writers don't always keep track of past even
TW>or worry about the implications of such bold statements like giving the
TW>Doctor's exact age.
TW>
TW>What's the saying: "Too many cooks spoil the broth."? So many writers --
TW>so many inconsistencies. Don't expect to find explanations.
TW>
TW>Q: Can anyone explain why the Doctor is X years old here, and Y years ol
TW>A: No. No one can. Next question please.
TW>
TW>Looking forward to watching this discussion again...
TW>
TW>Tom
TW>                                                                        

Hmm, well, they don't make Dr Who anymore in Britain, and almost all of the
PBS stations have stopped showing it.  So why not at least _talk_ about it!
(In other words, I think there would be less nitpicking if people could
watch the show instead of posting messages...but I like the glitch
theorizations, myself.)

"Sometimes what you say is going to get right in the faces of the powerful
 people who really run this world, but you don't care....  You know it's
 your place to challenge authority...."

Rockerboy, digital artiste' (rock@lakes.trenton.sc.us)
---
 * Amiga-Reader V2.00 * The Illuminati are watching YOU!
From: bn823@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Peter Mullaney)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Hello and some Questions..
Date: 11 Sep 1992 15:45:05 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bn823@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Peter Mullaney)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, mrmuon@next01pg2.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins) says:

>In article <18okajINN6v1@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> jcg8@po.CWRU.Edu (Jude C.  
>Giampaolo) writes:
>> Q1. I have noticed that many of the Dalek episode titles have 
>>     something to do with religion, eg. 'Genisis of the Daleks'
>> and 'Ressurection of the Daleks' I was wondering if anyone could
>> tell me if there is a reson for this, and how many of the titles
>> are this way?
>That's all. I think whoever was writing the story titles was bored, they  

Eli - what about 'Revelation of the Daleks'?


P.S.  Isn't it curious that Dr WHO has fans from a variety of religious/
non-religious/political groups.  We are athiests, Born Agains, Christians,
Fundamentalists, Liberals, Conservatives, etc.
The world sure is a funny place.

-- 
: Pete Mullaney              :  Always do right.  This will gratify       :
:                             :  some and astonish the rest.               :
:                             :      Samuel  Langhorne Clemens             :   
:                             :      aka Mark Twain                        :
From: danaf@vccsouth20.its.rpi.edu (Frank R. Dana Jr.)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: THE TARDIS
Date: 14 Sep 92 16:00:15 GMT
Reply-To: danaf@rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

In article <2596.130.uupcb@ssr.com>, doug.vermes%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Doug Vermes)  writes:
|> 
|> Let me point out an inconsistency that's been bugging me for a while.
|> It's in "Invasion of Time." As you may recall, the Doctor and company
|> are trapped in the TARDIS, because the Sontarans are in the console room
|> guarding the exit. This shouldn't be true. The Doctor shouldn't have
|> been trapped in the TARDIS. What happened to the "Alternate" console
|> room (the old wooden one), which ALSO had an exit from the TARDIS? The
|> Doctod?n6>r;r could easily have left the TARDIS via THAT exit!
|>  .kb;7vw.s.wwwwww~
|>        

OK, a rather lame but workable excuse... before the Doctor could do anything
from the secondary (or tertiary, see TNA:Nightshade) control rooms, he would
have to transfer control using the PRIMARY (or, at least, current...) console.

Or, considering it SEEMS he transferred control from the secondary during Season
17 (?), perhaps the Sontarans understand enough about the TARDIS to disable
that feature from the Primary con. I'm sure, for interests of security, the
person currently holding the master control console, wherever it may be, would
have complete control over all access paths.


-- 
/////////////////////////[[[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
(718)             (212)                        (516)             (518)
=======Amiuser============Frank R. Dana, Jr.============Doc Ami=======     
--------My opinions rarely reflect those of any sane person,----------
	   living, dead, or undead... that's gonna CHANGE.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin)
Subject: Re: Hello and some Questions..
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:57:26 GMT

In article <pw6y58n@rpi.edu> danaf@rpi.edu writes:
>In article <18okajINN6v1@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, jcg8@po.CWRU.Edu (Jude C. Giampaolo) writes:
>|> 
>|>     something to do with religion, eg. 'Genisis of the Daleks'
>|> and 'Ressurection of the Daleks' I was wondering if anyone could
>|> tell me if there is a reson for this, and how many of the titles
>|> are this way?
>
>Well... they're all about Daleks!   9)
>
>It's just tradition, now. Before it was tradition, it was considered a 
>"snappy" title. And, actually, the titles themselves do make sense, in line
>with the story. Being an atheist myself, I never really drew much of a 
>religious connenction. There's also Remembrance of the Daleks, Planet of the

Genesis of the Daleks was title that for obvious reasons.
Resurrection of the Daleks gains its name both from Davros' awakening
from his "tomb" and for Davros' plans to rebuild a new race of Daleks.
Revelation of the Daleks gets its name from Davros' awakening the sleeping
dead and giving them a sort of immortality, i.e. new life as Daleks,
which is a twist on events that take place on Judgement Day (when Christ
comes again, he awakens the dead and they live forever).
Remembrance of the Daleks gains its title from the "funeral" theme 
throughout the story, and of course, the Daleks ultimate fate at the
end of that one....



>Daleks, Evil of the Daleks.... EVERY Dalek story (barring the first one and,
From: HISC9016351D@LUST2.LATROBE.EDU.AU (MAMMONE,Robert)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: ALL OUR TOMORROWS: The Doctor and Causality
Date: 6 Sep 92 06:18:54 GMT
 <torresce.715548951@craft.camp.clarkson.edu> <79202@ut-emx.uucp> <1992Sep6.002419.14818@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Organization: La Trobe University
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.22

In <1992Sep6.002419.14818@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU writes:

>
>  Ah, but you are making the assumptioon that Terminus is from our Universe,
> and that was not established in the story.  As Steve Gallgher authored
> this story, I would think it very probably that the ship was from
> elsewhere, since he is the same writer who got the Doctor out of E-Space
> in "Warriors' Gate," a story that dealt with the intersection point
> of at least two universes.
 
Just because a script writer writes one story dealing with two universes,
doesn't necessarily mean that Terminus was about a ship from another
universe as well.  Drawing too long a bow, perhaps?  There was no indication
during the show that the ship came from another universe.  Also, if it had, why
would it be in  use as a treatment vessel for the Lazars?  Surely the 
authorities would use an alien ship from another universe for a better 
purpose than a dumping ground for the Lazars? 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin)
Subject: Re: More Theories About the Doctor's Age
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 04:03:00 GMT

In article <1992Sep6.142152.22838@lugb.latrobe.edu.au> HISC9016351D@LUST2.LATROBE.EDU.AU (MAMMONE,Robert) writes:
>> P.S. I just thought of others: Romana's regeneration - why can she select
>> her new body yet the Doctor can't and was the White Guardian the real WG in
>> The Ribos Operation.
>And yes, can anyone out there explain the hand behind Sutekh's throne, or
>the truck driving along in The Sontaran Experiment.  These are definitly
>questions that must be answered to secure the future of the show, and
>ensure that the sanity, and sleep of all fans is maintained.  Heh, heh.



Don't think I've ever seen those errors, although I did see a farmhouse
in the distance in "The Sontaran Experiment."
From: HISC9016351D@LUST2.LATROBE.EDU.AU (MAMMONE,Robert)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Immortal Companions:  The Doctor's Age & His Companions
Date: 6 Sep 92 06:28:28 GMT
Organization: La Trobe University
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.22

In <1992Sep5.190754.12513@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU writes:

> Here are a few ways out of this:  when the Doctor says "years" we don't
> know which planet's years he is referring to, i.e. Gallifrey's or Earth's
> or somewhere else's.
> Or perhaps the Doctor and Romana spent a lot more time in E-Space than
> we were told (perhaps leaving Adric behind somewhere for a while then
> picking him up again much later), or perhaps it was some strange effect
> of the Gateway, or perhaps when the Doctor was deaged in "The Leisure
> Hive" it didn't rewind him back all the way to 750.
> Then there's the old favorite of the Doctor leaving his companions
> behind for a while and then picking them up later,
> Or perhaps this one: we have no idea of the ageing rates of Trakens
> so perhaps a lot of time passed between "Time-Flight" and "Arc of
> Infinity" before we met Tegan again.  

I have to agree with the top paragraph.  It could be reasonable to say that
because Gallifrey exists "out of time", then so would its inhabitants, meaning
that they would age differently to those around them.  Of course, the
Gallifreyan's may measure time differently, anyway, accounting for the
aging of the Doctor over the years of the show.
However, the old chesnut of the Doctor leaving his companions behind, then
returning, is one I don't personally like.  The excuse used in The Two Doctors
to explain Victoria's absence is pretty weak, and the theory tends to go 
against what the Doctor would do anyway.  Like it or not, he is responsible
for their safety, and leaving them on an alien planet, in possibly a totally
different era is something I believe he wouldn't do.
Of course, you can blame the whole problem on the scriptwriters.  Can't
expect them to know the in's and out's of the show, but a basic working 
kniowledge would be advantageous, no?
From: Les_Jenkins@lppl.mi.org (Les Jenkins)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Dr. Who Classic Comics (was Re: DWM Issue 191...)
Distribution: world
Date: 7 Sep 92 21:30:12 EST
Organization: Les's Place BBS

Am I hearing this right? This will be published in the U.S. as well? As
Stimpy would say: "Happy Happy Joy Joy!" I have all of the original Doctor
Who comics published by Marvel in the U.S. back when they first tried to
get it started over here...



 -- AEd V1.37/Eval

-- Via DLG Pro v0.992

======================================================================
E-Mail to:      | "Stimpy, sometimes your wealth of ignorance simply |
Les@lppl.mi.org |  astounds me." - Ren Hoek                          |
----------------+-----------------------------------------------------
From: yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Dave Shariff Yadallee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: The female companions who can stand up to the doctor
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 05:26:13 MDT
Organization: Edmonton Remote Systems #3, Edmonton, AB, Canada

It took 24hrs of inspiration for this one.

Some of the more intersting companions are those females who could stand up
against the Doctor.

Barabara Wright, & Polly  making life interesting for the 1st and 2nd doctors.

Dr. Elizabeth Shaw always taking the Doctor on corcerning science.

Sarah Jane Smith always trying to be the outspoken feminist,

Leela  with her razor sharp reactions,  Romana always giving trying to
patronize the Doctor, Tegan was 50% with her mouth and gutsy attack.

Peri is one to admire.  She wouldn't take any flak from the Doc himself.

Ace has the potential of being another antithesis to the Doctor provided they
could bring her back.

Love these no nonsense women.

Dave Shariff Yadallee (yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca,
userLIBE@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca)
God Save the Queen, God Bless us All! Remember! Jesus Saves!!
Treaty of Maastricht, synonymous with the Key to Armageddon.
From: bn823@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Peter Mullaney)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: DALEK's
Date: 9 Sep 1992 17:03:27 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bn823@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Peter Mullaney)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


I never worried too much about continuity until I started to read this
newsgroup. 
   ... SO, to all the experts - in 'The Daleks' Hartnell discovers that
the Daleks run on static electricity, so he uses a coat to insulate the
floor to 'unplug' the Dalek.  I believe that in 'The Dalek Invasion of 
Earth' the Doctor discovers that the Daleks have developed a better 
source of power.  So how come in 'Genesis of the Daleks' the Daleks are
running all over Skaros without any source of static electricity?  I don't
think 'earth' and stone are a good source.

-- 
: Pete Mullaney              :  Always do right.  This will gratify       :
:                             :  some and astonish the rest.               :
:                             :      Samuel  Langhorne Clemens             :   
:                             :      aka Mark Twain                        :
From: HISC9016351D@LUST2.LATROBE.EDU.AU (MAMMONE,Robert)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: ALL OUR TOMORROWS:  The Doctor and Causality
Date: 5 Sep 92 11:06:06 GMT
Organization: La Trobe University
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.22

In <185d3pINNrp@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> sdh5@po.CWRU.Edu writes:

> 
, and, most importantly, has interfered with
> the very fabric of existence (In Logopolis, when the 'weave' of
> the Cosmos quite literally 'unraveled', everything that was in
> the area of effect became as though it never was! [With Nyssa
> surviving the annihilation of her reality only because she was
> 'outside' Existence, and was therefore immune to its effects]).
> 

While this doesn't actually answer your query, I'd like to make a couple
of points about the above paragraph.  Hopefully people will not think
I'm being overly pedantic, but it does irritate me when I beleive people
have got it wrong, though I stress the word believe.  As far as I know,
when the area around Traken was destroyed, it "wasn't as though it never
was."  That implies into never existed in time and space at all, which 
would mean Nyssa never existed at all.  As far as I know, entropy destroyed
that area of space, leaving a void.  Secondly, Nyssa is part of our 
reality, not another one, a la portions of Day of the Daleks. I'm not trying
to attack your ideas, just offering a different opinion.  Accept my
apologies if i've misunderstood your comment, and my resulting comments.
Cheers.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin)
Subject: Re: Genesis and Slipback Tapes
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 04:01:35 GMT

In article <1992Sep6.141259.22694@lugb.latrobe.edu.au> HISC9016351D@LUST2.LATROBE.EDU.AU (MAMMONE,Robert) writes:
>Here in Australia we have available for purchace a double cassette
>featuring the complete Slipback serial, and aGenesis of the Daleks tape
>(both audio).  I was thinking of buying it, and was wondering if anyone 
>in the U.S or U.K. could tell me whether the Genesis audio tape is the
>complete version, or a truncated one?  Cheers


The Genesis tape is truncated down to one hour.  It is a reissue of
an LP record released in 1978 or 79 and contains linking narration by
Tom Baker to explain action not obvious from just the sounds.
Actually, it's very interesting how well the story still works without
one hour and fifteen minutes of material.....

The Slipback tape is completely complete.
From: nlc@vulcan.xtel.co.uk (Neil Cook)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Location Filming
Date: 9 Sep 92 20:49:53 GMT
Organization: X-Tel Services Ltd.

In article <Bu9BIn.CEw@brunel.ac.uk>, Dean.Rose@brunel.ac.uk (Dean W Rose) writes:
|> Path: nott-cs!uknet!brunel!mepgdwr
|> From: Dean.Rose@brunel.ac.uk (Dean W Rose)
|> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
|> Subject: Location Filming
|> Message-ID: <Bu9BIn.CEw@brunel.ac.uk>
|> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 92 12:20:46 BST
|> Organization: Brunel University, West London, UK
|> Lines: 18
|> 
|> 
|> Are there any Dr. Who fans out there who know the proper filming location 
|> for "Day of the Daleks"? Inparticular the mansion house used for 
|> Sir Reginald Styles' house.
|> 
|> Almost all of the location guides that I have consulted insist that the 
|> story was filmed at "Gunnersbury Park" (London), however I know that this is
|> incorrect.
|> 
|> I have heard from several sources that the Taplow area in Buckinghamshire
|> was used but I am yet to prove this. 
|> 
|> Is there anyone out there who has any further information or sources which 
|> may help? 
|> 
|> Cheers.
|> 
|>        Dean Rose.

I don't know about this, but there's a quarry somewhere in Britain where just
about half the BBC sci-fi series ever made have been shot. You know - the 
obligatory desolate planet in Dr Who, Blakes 7 etc. all shot in the same
bloody quarry!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho