HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lhclin@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca (Louis Lin)
Subject: Re: smoking
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:17:59 GMT

In article <1992Dec18.000959.45741@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> nephilim@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
>In article <BzErzM.89q@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca>, lhclin@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca (Louis
> Lin) writes:
>
>> 
>> Before that is done, smokers can use their common sense to determine whether
>> it is appropriate to smoke rather than the it-is-legal-to-smoke-here-so-I-do
>> attitude. ("Hay! This is the smoking section of the plane.  You don't like it?
>> Complain to the airline company, or jump off.")
>> 
>My common sense tells me that I can smoke in the smoking section in a plane.
>You just can't blame  me on this because it is legal.  That's right. 
>Complain to the airline company or jump off.   You don't have to jump off, just
>shut up.

Good luck to you, if your common sense works to the rules.

>That's the best I can do.  I smoke in smoking area; and, I don't smoke in non-
>smoking area.  If you think I can't even smoke in smoking section in a plane,
>so what is the smoking section for?  You can't just consider non-smokers
>and ignore those smokers.  That's why they set the smoking section for us.
>Give me a break!  Whatever you say, I smoke in smoking section; and, I don't
>smoke in non-smoking section, no matter where the hell it is.
>Still the same old attitude, like it or beat it. 

It is the case that in a poorly ventilated area such as a plane, the smokers
are the ones that can do something that can make the life of everyone easier.
I have every right to consider the non-smokers have higher piority over the
smokers in this case.  If smoking is allowed, it is a hazard to the plane
passengers; if it is not, only personal pleasure of the smokers are affected.
The priority is clear.  Oh, sorry, I forgot your priority; your personal
pleasure is more important than other peoples' lives, "no matter where the
hell it is."  Why should anyone give you break when you are not reasonable?

-- 
______________________________________ 
| email : lhclin@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca | "The Truth is still the Truth
| Louis Lin, Computer Graphics Lab,  |  even if you choose to ignore it."
| University of Waterloo, Canada.    |
Xref: sparky soc.culture.hongkong:16201 soc.culture.china:32516 soc.culture.taiwan:16107 talk.politics.china:3388
From: hung@ee.tamu.edu (Tzu-Chien Hung)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong,soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,talk.politics.china
Subject: Re: Can we judge CCP based on the bad side only?
Date: 13 Dec 92 19:32:02 GMT
Article-I.D.: tamsun.1gg33iINNmgb
Organization: Texas A&M University
NNTP-Posting-Host: ee.tamu.edu

In article <1992Dec12.021158.4551@athena.mit.edu|> joe@athena.mit.edu (Joseph C Wang) writes:
|>In article <1gb5vsINNrvt@tamsun.tamu.edu|> hung@ee.tamu.edu (Tzu-Chien Hung) writes:
|>|>Name a few good things about CCP, so we can make judgement based on 
|>|>them.
|>
|>Within the last ten years, the CCP has figured out more or less how to
|>run the Chinese economy.
|>
|>People like to say that "X is 100% evil" or "Y is 100% good" because
|>it means that they don't have to think too much about X and Y.  
|>
|>The real world is more complicated than that.
|>
|>

It takes more than forty years just to figure out moer or less how to 
run the Chinese economy. Can we say GOOD?
O.K CCP is not 100% evil. How about 99% or 90%?
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong,soc.culture.china
From: yuen@bhprtc.scpd.oz.au (Daniel Yuen)
Subject: Re: An easy Chinese Chess puzzle 
Organization: BHP Steel, Sheet & Coil, Research & Technology Centre
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 23:44:29 GMT

In an earlier post, I wrote :

>Since it is near Christmas, let's have some fun and no more politics.
>I post a Chinese chess puzzle below which I came across some years ago.
>It is not extremely difficult, but have fun anyway.
>
> 3   R------ ------N      Legend :
>     |\     |     /|        R -- Red Rook
>     |  \   |   /  |        N -- Red Knight (Horse)
>     |    \   /    |        K -- BLACK King
> 2    ------K------
>     |    / | \    |      Puzzle :
>     |  /   |   \  |        How can red win without moving its pieces
>     |/     |     \|        outside the square (ie outside the boundary
> 1   N------ ------R        shown).
>                            (Of course the challenge is to do it in the
>     A      B      C         least number of moves!)
>
>(In order to facilitate discussions, I have marked the rows as 1-2-3 and
> columns as A-B-C.)
>
>Cheers and have a Merry Christmas.

In order to make it not "extremely easy", namely, RED wins in one move
(e.g. C3-B1 : stalemate, hence a win for RED), I should impose another
condition that I forgot to mention :
  -- That RED has to put BLACK in check in every move.
Sorry for the omission.

Daniel (yuen@bhprtc.scpd.oz.au)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong,soc.culture.china
From: wmleolau@uwovax.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: What do you think of Chris Patten
Organization: University of Western Ont, London
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 02:50:03 GMT
Followup-To: soc.culture.hongkong

In article <5ce68c7f.1b2f0@digital.sps.mot.com>, chen@digital.sps.mot.com (Jinfu Chen) writes:
> In article <1992Dec10.150401.1@uwovax.uwo.ca> wmleolau@uwovax.uwo.ca writes:
[deleted]
>>In article <5cdc3b9a.1b2f0@digital.sps.mot.com>, chen@digital.sps.mot.com (Jinfu Chen) writes: 
[deleted]

> You seem to misunderstand my posting.  I did not imply HKers are teenage boy
> but rather pointing out BG and Chris Patten are **not** sincerely interested
> helping HK to achieve democracy.  To believe so is no different than a
> teenage boy having a wet dream.  There is no doubt HK people need democracy
> now, they and all Chinese need it fifty years ago.  However, why all the
> suddent BG starts caring about HKers and trying to bring democracy to HK just
> before they are going to leave?  I just can't stand the typical British
> hypocracy -- trying to rip-off and destroy its colony before leaving in the
> name of democracy.
> 
-- 

I would like to know the factors you think that can damage HK and Mainland
if we let the British (in your wording) or HK government (in my wording) to
start the democracy reform.  I would like to known more concrete points, not
just use history.

I think one reason for HK government leaders and many local interest group
leaders to push the reform is trying to protect the present situration in
HK, so that CCP will not be so easy to impose their own things to HK.  Quite
a lot of British businessman have properties in HK, such a democratic system
can also protect them.

You may say the British can extend their influences after 1997.  I think such
influences can only possible in economics, not direct influence on HK's
political decision.  Of cause, most HK government decisions are somehow
related to the economic powers in HK.  
But in terms of economic influence, USA and Japan won't have less
influence than Britain.  As in the present development in China,
CCP allow economic influences from Japan and give the Japanese
a lot of economic privileges.  This actions just to attract foreign
capital for the local development.  Some thing in HK, if other country
can have economic influences and they invest in HK, it is good for HK.
I don't think it is wise to try to remove all British economic
influence after 1997.

I believe in mutual benefits and cooperation can help HK's development.
  

Raymond Kwok
From: mlt@gdwb.oz.au (Mee Teng)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: My dismay II (Chris Patten)
Date: 17 Dec 92 02:55:04 GMT

jlam@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au (Lord Automato) writes:


>I doubt very much about the stories cited. As far as I am aware of, there is no
>racial discrimination policies in HK, although I believe the richer people can
>live in better place. I don't think rich and influential figures like Bao Yu Gang
>or Run Run Shaw would not be admitted to these clubs if they want to. 

>|> You people from Hongkong ( most of you anyway) have a sick
>|> attitude which no word in the dictionary can describe well.

>It doesn't really matter where you come from, stupidity only associate with
>individuals.

Well, Lin Can, I never imply that they are stupid - it is a kind of
mentality & not stupidity. You are right - Stupidity belongs to individuals
, but society dictates the mentality, the attitudes, the behaviour &
the arrogance of its people.

Anyway, no personal hard feeling.

Have a blessed Christmas & a Happy New Year .
From: Raju.Daryanani@p309.f1.n700.z6.fidonet.org (Raju Daryanani)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Use of abbreviations in SCMP...Anyone? Anyone?
Date: 12 Dec 1992 11:23:33 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


In a msg on <Dec 09 19:12>, Per Anders Olausson of 6:700/1.300 writes:

 PAO> From: dxper@dtek.chalmers.se (Per Anders Olausson)
 PAO> Organization: Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg 
 PAO> Sweden

 PAO>   Well, here I am with a copy of the Employment classifieds 
 PAO> studying first class Hong Kong style cryptology.

 PAO>   Might some kind soul out there in the bitstream elaborate on 
 PAO> the use of the following unrecoqnised abb:

 PAO>   form 5

 PAO>   form 7

 PAO>   form X

In HK school is structured as Primary forms 1 to 6, then Secondary 1 to 5,
followed by Forms 6 and 7 optionally (or 6 lower and upper).  Form 5 normally
means secondary Form 5.

 PAO>   ACCA

Chartered Association of Certified Accountants (the abbreviation is a
leftover from their previous name, Assoc. of Chartered & Certified Accountants). 
It's the qualification required of Certified Public Accountants.  The exams
are structured as 3 levels, from 1 to 3, each consisting of a number of papers.

 PAO>   LCC

London Chamber of Commerce and Industry (people tend to drop the I).  Exams
are held by this body at several levels (elementary, intermediate & higher)
and correspond to something like Forms 5 to 7.  The papers are usually
business and accounting oriented.

 PAO>   If I forgot to mention any which might pop up unexpectedly feel 
 PAO> free to add the list! (mainly looking for Computer related 
 PAO> jobs...)

I suppose you understand things like RDBMS, AS/400, LAN, 4GL, ... :-)

MFG - Manufacturing
Poly - Polytechnic

Raju 
--- msgedsq 2.1
 * Origin: Raju's Point (6:700/1.309)
SEEN-BY: 700/1 5 8 74 101 232 275 925 1066/300 301 309
--  
uucp: uunet!m2xenix!puddle!6!700!1.309!Raju.Daryanani
Internet: Raju.Daryanani@p309.f1.n700.z6.fidonet.org
From: jlam@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au (Lord Automato)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: What do you think of Chris Patten
Date: 14 Dec 1992 12:47:13 +1100
Organization: University of Melbourne
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au


In article <1992Dec5.013414.5509@cucs5.cs.cuhk.hk>, ctyau@cs.cuhk.hk (YAU Chor-tung) writes:

|> What the CCP had done to China is history now, so is what UK have done.
|> But can't we make any objection to what IS GOING TO BE DONE on us?
|> 
|> Tung

Sure, June 4th is history, intimidating HK government last week is history,
We are living in part of future's history, if you don't try hard to improve
our future, our history in the future could be as bad as the history that
we have seen.

Lin Can
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: cw@orion.uucp (C.W. Chung)
Subject: Re: Airport Project in Hong Kong
Organization: Objectivity Inc.
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 22:57:04 GMT

In article <11402@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> anthony@cs.uq.oz.au writes:
>In <1992Dec8.204640.1876@objy.com> cw@orion.uucp (C.W. Chung) writes:

>You are right there are only 18 of them, 18 in a house of 60.
>Not too good is it ?

The number 18 is not a majority, but is a very significant minority.
Last Legco vote is only 25-23, and may have be one of the closest vote in
the LogCo history.  With a base of 18, all you need is a few more
swing votes from the appointed and functional groups members.  You could
raise a lot of noise with these 18 votes!

>:when agreement has not been secured on the ariport project.
>:As far as I know, the direct-members have not been very active in 
>:watching over the airport project to safeguard the interest of people
>:of HK. So I fail to see how more direct-elected members would help.

>Have you got reference to back that up ?  

Mostly based on last vote and the lack of hearing of their voice in the 
Airport Project in the past.  Of course, it could be my total ignorance 
of what they have done and I welcome any enlightenment.

>:HK UST is an easy target.  The LegCo and the media can pick on any
>:other projects which does not have powerful political backing.  
>:However, when it comes to the biggest project in the history of HK,
>:pushed and  100% backed by the British Govt, it is a different story.

>Political backing has nothing to do with it.  The elected members
>are accountable to the people who elected not to the British
>Government nor the Chinese government.  Stop being so cynical.

It is hard to believe that political backing of a legislation has 
nothing to do with how a LegCo member vote.  Let's agree to disagree
then.

Cynical of what?  All I ask the direct-elected members to do is keep
the govt honest to show more accountability in the Airport Project.
Is it too much to ask?

-cw-
From: Dean.Lee@f1.n651.z6.fidonet.org (Dean Lee)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Chart 11-22 (Chinese)
Date: 17 Dec 1992 13:43:03 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


In a msg on <Nov 22 07:18>, 91066702 of 6:700/1.300 writes:

 9> From: 91066702@cphkvx.cphk.hk
 9> Organization: OSU Physics Dept.

 9> begin 644 bc.txt
 9> M/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]
 9> M/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T-"@T*L-.W?J1'I7BL>:;FNET-"BTM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
 9> M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM#0H-
 9> M"J6[MF>W<Z17NEVZ<::Q#0I^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^
 9> M?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?@T*#0HR.2X@J5"\>K'3("`@
 9> M("`@("`@("`@(""I=+/FJKJDW[5H#0H-"C(R+B"G9*=GIG"A0KY'I>RPMR`@
 9> M("`@(*5UIEVG0:3?ODL-"@T*,38N(+;`JWZWO2`HI7C&5[IQI.(I("`@P6&U
 9> M3::SI$"DT:?:K<RDP,+W#0H-"C$U+B"DT[>E("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@(*7#
 9> MN[>W4J=!#0H-"C$T+B"XK:7)K>L@("`@("`@("`@("`@(+;,LK2R7`T*#0H@
 9> M-RX@ML"SS:K@("`@("`@("`@("`@(""DH[2QI6BW4@T*#0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM
 9> M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
 9> M+0T*#0JD4:1JNG&FL0T*?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^
 9> M?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GY^?GX-"@T*,3`N(+%IM+S`32`@("`@
 9> M("`@("`@("`@LW*GVK9]I-^G80T*#0H@.2X@I_6PZK*[("`@("`@("`@("`@
 9> M(""E_JRPI$:G00T*#0H@."X@JDRF?"`@("`@("`@("`@("`@(""DM+5-L]_%
 9> M=Z?:#0H-"B`W+B"VP+/-JN`@("`@("`@("`@("`@(*2CM+&E:+=2#0H-"B`V
 9> M+B"SHK1)J[`@("`@("`@("`@("`@(+=2IT$-"@T*(#4N(*I,I&RRNR`@("`@
 9> M("`@("`@("`@I,VW4JKXIG,-"@T*(#0N(+Q"O'>UV"`@("`@("`@("`@("`@
 9> ML+*XRPT*#0H@,RX@OJ2I^B`@("`@("`@("`@("`@(""GVK=226-H:6)A;@T*
 9> M#0H@,BX@K_.[9R`@("`@("`@("`@("`@(""F0:BC<F%I;GD@9&%Y<PT*#0H@
 9> M,2X@L6F^QZ3-("`@("`@("`@("`@(""W4J3UJN$-"@T*/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]
 9> M/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T-
 9> !"@``
 9> `
 9> end
Hi, I am an pop music fan from Shanghai, China, and interested in the pop
song chart in HK. But how can I display these in Chinese??

-= Merry X'mas and a Happy New Year =- 

Dean Lee
--------
Internet : Dean.Lee@f1.n651.z6.fidonet.org
uucp : uunet!m2xenix!puddle!6!651!Dean.Lee

--- msgedsq 2.1
 * Origin: Computer's Rock-n-Roll <<Shanghai,China>> (021) 793-3827 (6:651/1)
SEEN-BY: 651/1 700/1 5 8 74 101 232 275 925 1066/300 301 309
--  
uucp: uunet!m2xenix!puddle!6!651!1!Dean.Lee
Internet: Dean.Lee@f1.n651.z6.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: ccgary@brolga.cc.uq.oz.au (Gary Young)
Subject: Airline Companies Addresses & Flying Schools
Summary: I'am very interested in obtaining names and addresses
Keywords: Aviation Contact Addresses
Organization: Prentice Centre, University of Queensland
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 01:56:56 GMT

I'am very interested in obtaining names and addresses of
aviation airline companies and flying schools.
I would like to correspond to overseas airlines companies
to offer trainees the opportunity to learn to fly and obtain
a higher education in Australia at the Air Training Centre
in Brisbane, Queensland.

Thanking You

Gary Young                                 Education Officer
Prentice Centre                            Tel: +61 7 365 4359
The University of Queensland               Fax: +61 7 365 4477
Queensland, 4072 Australia           EMAIL:ccgary@brolga.cc.uq.oz.au
_____________________________________________________________________




Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: xxmok@utagraph.uta.edu (xxmok)
Subject: w
Organization: University of Texas at Arlington
                                                  
                                                         
                                     TESTING !!!
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:25:35 GMT




































Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: poon@jomby.cs.wisc.edu (Ka-Cheong Poon)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Anonymous news (Re: Forged Account Name)
Date: 18 Dec 92 19:41:10 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison -- Computer Sciences Dept.

In article <1992Dec18.022802.10230@bhprtc.scpd.oz.au> yuen@bhprtc.scpd.oz.au (Daniel Yuen) writes:
>eln235s@lindblat.cc.monash.edu.au (Humphrey Hui) writes:

[Deleted]

>To post anonymously is neither high-tech nor hacking. Hacking is something
>original, not many people can be ranked as hackers.

[The method is deleted]

>For obvious reasons, some people would want to post anonymously (you and I
>are lucky and have no such a 'need').  I guess anonymous posting is
                                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Just a game of word.  The way you described should be called fake news posting.
To me anonymous posting is a way to post news such that no one knows who you 
are, yet people can respond to you.  What you described doesn't meet this 
criterion.  Fake news posting is not a responsible way to discuss matters.  I
discourage people from doing this.  Post anonymously if you like, but don't
send fake news.

>understandable and acceptable as long as it is used responsibly.  The
>submission should address the issues being discussed rather than being used
>as a means of irresponsible personal attacks.  Unfortunately I have seen
>a lot of postings recently (in both soc.culture.hongkong &
>soc.culture.china) which have broken this guideline.

Have fun!!!

								Poon.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: xxmok@utagraph.uta.edu (xxmok)
Subject: h
Organization: University of Texas at Arlington
   This is just a test
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:11:19 GMT

Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: wmleolau@uwovax.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: NEWS: Survey Article of Chinese Economy
Organization: University of Western Ont, London
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 21:40:23 GMT
Followup-To: soc.culture.hongkong

In article <3471@peking.gdwb.oz.au>, mlt@gdwb.oz.au (Mee Teng) writes:
> mte152s@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au writes:
> 
> Thanks for posting this article ! I just hope that many
> arraogant Hongkies will read this without prejudices and with
> their heads ' sticking OUT of the colonial skirts'. 
> 
>>China's economic performance in the 14 years since then has brought about one
>>of the biggest improvements in human welfare at any time. Real GNP has grown by
> 
> Did the author make a mistake ? Shouldn't it be Honkong ? 
> I tell you many of the arrogant attitudes of the Hongkies are 
> just despicable as can be seen from the numerous posting in this
> group. Many of them idolise anything of 'colonial' connotation, but
> despise the Chinese from mainland. They think the mainland Chinese
> are ignorant, narrow minded, 'antique' in thinking (as Lin Can't put
> it); on the other hand, by hiding under the 'colonial skirts', they
> think they know everything in this world, they think they are
> also superior like their 'colonial masters'. One even claims that
> he travelled more than me - just because he has been to Britian -
> what a ludicrous & humbug statement ! 
> 
> I may dissappoint many of you who flamed me assuming that I am
> from China. No. I am not . I step into this group because I
> haven't seen any body as arrogant & shamless as most of the
> Hongkies. ( I am not saying all people from Honkong are like that,
> but there are enough of you to give Hongkong the bad name.)
> 
> Perhaps you would have treated me differently if I have made myself
> known earlier eh ? Shame on you arrogant Hongkies !
> 
> Ps. Anyone (except British I think) who has been to Hongkong 
> would agree that they are the most rude & arrogant people
> in this world (- at least to those who look like Chinese to them.)
> 
> 
-- 

I really want to know the purposes of you to put this kind of
message in here?  I can't see any meaningful point here!

Raymond Kwok

Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
From: pkk36438@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Polygon)
Subject: Re: X'mas and worshiping white god.
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:11:43 GMT

Kelvin.Leung@f1.n700.z6.fidonet.org (Kelvin Leung) writes:


>I do agree that "merry X'mas" might not be a politically correct term.
>Nonetheless, please don't generalise and label God (and Jesus) as 
>"White-God."  To say the very least, Jesus was a middle-east person,
>not a white person.  Please get your facts straight before complaining.
>Thank you.

	Are middle-east people Mongolian Asian or Caucasian Asian?
	Is Judism an Asian religion- if Jews are not white?

>Yours Sincerely,
>Kelvin 

						Peter, UIUC

Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong,talk.politics.china
From: wmleolau@uwovax.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: An answer to all responses
Organization: University of Western Ont, London
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 18:11:05 GMT

In article <1992Dec10.233934.13514@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>, mingh@momth3.maths.monash.edu.au (J He) writes:
> In article <eln235s.723901728@lindblat.cc.monash.edu.au> eln235s@lindblat.cc.monash.edu.au (Humphrey Hui) writes:
[deleted] 
>             
> 
>             "the" Chinese nation is CCP and those people who support CCP.
>             Understand!!! all capitalist running dogs.
> 
>             Jian Chen-2
> 
-- 
Give a suggestion for those non-CCP supporters, where can we stay if we
still want to be a Chinese?

Raymond Kwok
From: plaw@girtab.usc.edu (Patrick Law)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: Bruce Lee
Date: 18 Dec 1992 10:55:03 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: girtab.usc.edu

In article <1992Dec17.234824.6279@tellab5.tellabs.com> henryng@tellabs.com (Henry Ng) writes:
>Anything going on with the king of Kung Fu Bruce Lee lately?
He celebrated his son's birthday last Wednesday in the Beveley Hilton.
Then he had a short talk with Senator Boxer.

>Can anybody confirm that Hollywood is making a movie about his legend?
Yes. A film producer will make a movie about how Bruce Lee was a fake
and he did not know Kung Fu at all.

>Can anybody confirm that his name/star is in the Walk-of-Fame in Hollywood near the
>Mann theater?
>
I cannot find his star as there are too many homeless people have their beds
around there.

Patrick the Bold