HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: frerk@tk.telematik.informatik.uni-karlsruhe.de (Frerk Meyer)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mime,comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Postscript considered harmful with MIME
Date: 28 Jan 1993 10:31:54 GMT
Organization: University of Karlsruhe, Informatics Department, Telecooperation Group
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: loophole.telematik.informatik.uni-karlsruhe.de
Keywords: Programming

Digitals mailreader 'dxmail' -Motif version- displays Postscript if the
mail body contains Postscript code. It is able to do so because DECwindows
have the DisplayPostscriptExtension built-in. Digital isn't famous for
not keeping security in mind, so could it be that harmful?
 
-- 
Frerk Meyer <frerk@tk.telematik.informatik.uni-karlsruhe.de>  -+
Portnoy@irc             "Do the ride thing!"                 o>o
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mime
From: kankkune@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Risto Kankkunen)
Subject: Re: Using MIME without extra mail headers
Organization: University of Helsinki, Department of Computer Science
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 18:12:37 GMT

>>Would it not be simpler and more expedient to work on the wone
>>gateway that doesn't know how to handle MIME headers right, than
>>to hack up 100 MIME-ready clients to implement some nonstandard
>>options?
>
>I will say for the last time (applause) that this is not a problem with
>gateways, but with mail _domains_.  Some domains simply don't allow for
>headers other than a selected few.

I think, that if you have to use that kind of a method inside your mail
domain (i.e. put the MIME and other extra headers in the body itself),
the gateway to Internet (if your domain is connected) should do the
transformation between that format and the pure MIME format. That is, it
is important that the messages in your special format don't escape to
Internet to cause confusion. Otherwise it should be up to you what you
do privatly inside your domain.

-- 
                  dos, windows, nt... are you a victim of the MS disease?
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mime
From: mdg@netcom.Netcom.COM (Mark Grand)
Subject: MIME Overview ftp server
Organization: Premenos
Distribution: comp
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:51:27 GMT

The FTP server that the mime overview is on was broken this weekend.
It is up again.  In hopes of avoiding any confusion, the original
announcement of the MIME Overview follows:

================

In order to promote interest in MIME I have written an overview of
MIME that is a gentler introduction than the RFC.  It begins with a
two page overview of what MIME is and what it is good for.  The
remainder of the document describes the technical details of MIME.

The mime overview is available in two forms: postscript and ASCII.  I
recommend the postscript version as being more readable version.
Both versions of the mime overview are available by anonymous ftp from
adad.premenos.sf.ca.us.  They are in the /pub directory.  The
postscript version is in a file called mime.ps.  The ASCII version is
in a file called mime.txt.
--
Mark Grand
Premenos Corporation                510-602-2000
1000 Burnett, Second Floor          mark@premenos.sf.ca.us
Concord, CA   94520
-- 
Mark Grand
Premenos Corporation                510-602-2000
1000 Burnett, Second Floor          mark@premenos.sf.ca.us
Concord, CA   94520
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mime,alt.security.pgp
From: andyr@wizzy.com (Andy Rabagliati)
Subject: pgp headers for MIME
Organization: W.Z.I.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:31:39 GMT

Has anyone been working on a pgp interface for MIME ?

This would enable one to transparently send Public Key encrypted mail,
and other things.

It would have to be orthogonal to the regular headers.

In correspondence with Tobias Weingartner <weingart@inf.ethz.ch> he
suggests 

TW> I think pgp data should go so:
TW> 
TW> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
TW> Content-transfer-encoding: X-PGP-{VERSION}
TW> 
TW> Where {VERSION} would be: 2.0, 2.1, etc...
TW> 
TW> This would allow the benefit of transferring text, sounds,
TW> graphics, etc...

Which seems good to me.

Cheers,  Andy.
-- 
Amendment 2 information newsgroup co.politics.amend2.info - mailing list also.
andyr@wizzy.com          W.Z.I. Consulting (719)635-6099               pgp-2.1
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mime
From: fontaine@sri.ucl.ac.be (Alain Fontaine)
Subject: Re: MIME Overview ftp server
Followup-To: comp.mail.mime
Organization: Universite Catholique de Louvain
Distribution: comp
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 12:54:24 GMT

It seems that the overview only covers RFC1341 (the mail body stuff).

RFC1342 (on using fancy character sets in some of the fields of the
headers) can be argued to be part of MIME too. Maybe it should be
covered in the next version....                         /AF
Xref: sparky comp.mail.mime:182 alt.security.pgp:589
From: jbotz@mtholyoke.edu (Jurgen Botz)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mime,alt.security.pgp
Subject: Re: pgp headers for MIME
Date: 22 Jan 1993 12:55:08 -0500
Organization: Mount Holyoke College
NNTP-Posting-Host: slab.mtholyoke.edu

In article <C18C4r.6K8@wizzy.com> andyr@wizzy.com (Andy Rabagliati) writes:
>Has anyone been working on a pgp interface for MIME ?
>[...]
>In correspondence with Tobias Weingartner <weingart@inf.ethz.ch> he
>suggests 
>[...]
>TW> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>TW> Content-transfer-encoding: X-PGP-{VERSION}
>TW> 
>TW> Where {VERSION} would be: 2.0, 2.1, etc...

No!  You should use an application sub-type... that way you're
MIME conformant.  If you define a new transfer encoding, the
message is NOT A MIME MESSAGE.

Sigh... why do people always think that standards need to be
improved upon?
-- 
Jurgen Botz, jbotz@mtholyoke.edu
Northampton, MA, USA
From: coconut@crash.cts.com (Brian Dear)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mime
Subject: RFC 1341 -- mail me a copy?
Date: 24 Jan 93 00:35:37 GMT
Reply-To: brian@coconut.com
Organization: Coconut Computing, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA

I am trying to get a copy of RFC 1341.  I don't have telnet/ftp access.
Could someone email me the file as a text file?  NeXTmail is ok.

Email to: brian@coconut.com

Thanks!

Brian Dear /// Coconut Computing, Inc. /// brian@coconut.com
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mime
From: whchung@watson.ibm.com (William Chung)
Subject: Table of contents for a MIME note?
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:47:58 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

Often, it is useful to know details about a MIME format note such
as the number and types of note parts.  For example, it would be
nice to know a new note had 3 parts, text/plain, text/richtext,
and audio/midi.

Naturally, a note's MIME structure cannot be known without completely
reading and parsing the note.  Reading and parsing a MIME note takes
a lot of effort.  It would be nice to save the structure of a MIME note
once the note has been parsed.  Having a "table of contents" for a MIME
note is a win because then the parsing only needs to be done once instead
of every time the note is rendered.

The MIME standard (RFC 1341) does not appear to describe any sort of
table of contents mechanism for summarizing information about a MIME
note in an efficient, easy to process form.  Has anyone addressed the
issue of how to describe, store, and transmit summary information about
a MIME note so that multiple lengthy parses can be avoided?

Thanks for your thoughts,
- William Chung.
IBM Research
T.J. Watson Research Center
whchung@watson.ibm.com
From: jack@ccsf.caltech.edu (Jack Stewart)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mime
Subject: Re: Table of contents for a MIME note?
Date: 28 Jan 1993 19:11:33 GMT
Organization: CCSF Caltech, Pasadena, CA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: laguna.ccsf.caltech.edu

mhn (part of the mh 6.8 distribution) generates a "table of contents"
when you scan a message or folder.  In is straight forward for a mail
reader to generate such a table from the body of a MIME message.  The
following is a sample table output from mhn:

% mhn -list 9 +meta-mail
 msg part  type/subtype              size description                         
   9       multipart/alternative     8975
     1     multipart/mixed           5334
     1.1   text/richtext             2914
     1.2   message/external-body       30 The 2.4.CHANGES file                
           text/plain                    
     1.3   text/richtext               10
     1.4   message/external-body       64 The core tar file (mm2.4.tar.Z)     
           application/octet-stream      
     1.5   text/richtext               10
     1.6   message/external-body       69 The contrib tar file (contrib2.4.tar
           application/octet-stream      
     1.7   text/richtext               10
     1.8   message/external-body       65 The DOS tar file (dos2.4.tar.Z)     
           application/octet-stream      
     1.9   text/richtext               10
     1.10  message/external-body       65 The Amiga tar file (amiga2.4.tar)   
           application/octet-stream      
     1.11  text/richtext                5
     2     text/plain                3233

I am sure that other MIME mail readers are probably capable of
something similar.  Just because you don't have a table of contents in
the message body doesn't mean that you can't generate one.

---Jack

-- 
Jack Stewart                                     E-Mail: jack@CCSF.Caltech.EDU
Caltech Concurrent Supercomputing Facilities,     Phone: 818-356-2153
Mail Code # 158-79, 391 S. Holliston, 
Pasadena, CA 91125.                            #include  <std.disclaimer>
From: louie@sayshell.umd.edu (Louis A. Mamakos)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mime
Subject: Re: Postscript considered harmful with MIME
Date: 28 Jan 1993 01:43:51 GMT
Organization: The University of Maryland, College Park
NNTP-Posting-Host: sayshell.umd.edu

In article <syscrc.728169696@gsusgi1.gsu.edu> syscrc@pickle.gsu.edu (Randy Carpenter) writes:
>I read in metamail's README that displaying Postscript in a MIME e-mail is
>extremely dangerous (i.e. not secure).  It went on to say that printing
>is relatively secure.

Briefly, imagine if you will that your workstation has a (Display)
PostScript interpreter.  Your workstation has a file system, with
various interesting files.  Recall that PostScript has file operators.
Season to taste.

This is more an implementation issue/warning than a problem with MIME
itself.

louie

Xref: sparky comp.mail.mh:1535 comp.mail.sendmail:3251
From: eric@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Eric Allman)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh,comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: MH aliases
Date: 22 Jan 1993 15:59:14 GMT
Organization: UC Berkeley Mammoth Project
Distribution: world
Reply-To: eric@CS.Berkeley.EDU
NNTP-Posting-Host: mastodon.cs.berkeley.edu

In article <PATRICK.93Jan21211802@delphi.Stanford.EDU>, patrick@casbs.Stanford.EDU (Patrick Goebel) writes:
|> On a related note, I often see addresses of the form
|> 
|> firstname.lastname@host.domain
|> 
|> If I try to make such an alias in our /etc/aliases file (SunOS 4.1.1
|> using sendmail), I run into all sorts of trouble.  If I'm not
|> mistaken, having a "." before the "@" violates one of the format
|> rules.

No, there is nothing in the RFCs that says this is incorrect (unless it
is in the phrase part of a ``Full Name <address@domain>'' syntax address,
which was the problem with the ``Mr. Foo Bar <foobar@some.where>'' that
appeared a few days ago).

It is possible to configure sendmail to use dots in the local-part (that
is, the left hand side of the @) in different ways, but most sites do not
do this.  I suggest using ``sendmail -bt'' to track down what it is
really doing with these names.

Old Berkeley sendmail.cf files would cause the problem you are having
because of the (now long dead, at least at Berkeley) BerkNet syntax.
This was originally ``host:user'', but colons ARE illegal in local-parts,
so we had sendmail map dot to colon so that ``host.user'' would become
``host:user''.  Newer config files do not do this.

eric
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
From: meuer@camax.com (Mark Meuer)
Subject: Re: "Automatic" Fcc: under mh-e?
Organization: CAMAX Systems, Inc.
Distribution: comp
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 17:35:20 GMT

patrick@casbs.Stanford.EDU (Patrick Goebel) writes:

>Has anyone figured out how to have mh-e generate a default Fcc: line
>from the text typed to the To: prompt during a send (`s') or reply
>(`a')?

>Ideally, I'd like to have a user-created file (like the aliases file)
>that lists pairs of usernames and foldernames.  Then, when I enter a
>username at the To: prompt, the corresponding foldername would be
>inserted on the Fcc: line automatically.  Of course, one could then
>edit the Fcc: line once in edit buffer if desired.

I don't know how to do this, but I would love to be able to.  One of
the things that makes elm so great is that it can be set to save all
outgoing mail in a folder named by the user to whom the mail is being
sent.  Likewise, when I save a message the default name is prompts
with is the name of the user who sent it.  Thus, with zero effort, I
have a complete record of all mail sent and received sorted by user.
If anyone can tell me how to do something close to this with mh, I'd
switch in a minute.

-mark
-- 
Mark Meuer   <><  | CAMAX, Inc | (612) 854-5300 Ext 376 | meuer@camax.com
For years after I saw the "The Exorcist," I felt this need to be
around priests.  Friends would say, "What do you want to do
tonight?" And I'd say, "Let's take in a Mass!"  - Dave Barry
From: wohler@hw1175.sap-ag.de (Bill Wohler)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: New FAQ Submitted
Date: 23 Jan 93 16:55:39 GMT
Reply-To: Bill Wohler <wohler@sap-ag.de>
Organization: SAP AG  Walldorf, Germany
Phone: +49 6227-341658  Home: +49 6221-163255
X-Mailer: MH [Version 6.8]

Folks,

  A new FAQ has been submitted to the pit-manager FAQ server and
  should appear soon.  For future reference, instructions for
  obtaining the faq via anonymous ftp and mail are included at the end
  of this message.

  o sources are now relegated to end of faq in hopes of making the faq
    more accessible.


			  Changed questions

Viewing This Article
  Mention that dates of last update are now added.

2.  What is the current version/status of MH?
3.  Where can I get MH?
  Updated for MH 6.8.  Mail servers also updated.

4.  What references exist for MH?
  Updated mh-users archive information.  Files containing scans of
  archives now available.  FAQ ftp and mail information is now correct.

5.  What other MH software is available?
  Added mime-compose.el (mime for mh-e), mixmh (mime for xmh),
  and QueueMH. 

6.  How can I print a MH manual?
  Added information on what to do if docs missing.

11. How do I build MH?
15. What do I do if scan shows the wrong date?
16. Why slocal writes messages to system maildrop that from(1) can't read.
  Answer simplified to "Upgrade to 6.8."

20. Where can I read about slocal and the format of the .maildelivery file?
  Man page names updated for MH 6.8.

21. How do I include messages in repl with or without ">"?
  Made it clear (I hope) that this doesn't work in pre-6.7.2 versions.

24. Can I append MH messages (ie. +inbox/1) to a UNIX mailbox format file?
  Removed packmbox script since it is now in the distribution.

26. What to do with "Problems with edit - draft removed".
  Mentioned new ATTVIBUG option.

     		    New questions

19. Why does "mailgroup mail" only affect inc and not slocal?
35. What to do with "bad address 'xxx' - no at-sign after local-part".

babyl2mh.pl
inco

  These new appendices used to appear within the text of the
  faq.  I've pulled them out to make the text more readable.

    
			  Obtaining the FAQ

  By anonymous ftp:
    pit-manager.mit.edu	[18.72.1.58]	/pub/usenet/news.answers/mh-faq
					/pub/usenet/news.answers/nn-faq
    ftp.uu.net [137.39.1.9]		/archive/usenet/news.answers/mh-faq.Z
					/archive/usenet/news.answers/nn-faq.Z

  By uucp:
    uunet!/archive/usenet/news.answers/mh-faq.Z
    uunet!/archive/usenet/news.answers/nn-faq.Z

  By mail:
    Send mail to mail-server@pit-manager.mit.edu containing one (or
    both) of the following:
  
	send usenet/news.answers/mh-faq
	send usenet/news.answers/nn-faq


						--bw
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh,comp.mail.sendmail
From: jrh@jrh.uucp (James R. Hamilton)
Subject: Re: MH aliases
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 04:03:51 GMT
Organization: private system, Toronto, Ontario

In article <1993Jan19.211110.13705@athena.mit.edu> zchi@athena.mit.edu (Zhihang Chi) writes:
>Hi netters,
>
>I have the following alias in my ~/Mail/aliases file.
>
>foobar: Mr. Foo Bar <zchi@mit.edu>
>
>When I send a message, I get:
>
>post: bad address 'Mr. Foo Bar <zchi@mit.edu>' - no at-sign after local-part (Bar), continuing...
>
    The period in "Mr. Foo Bar" is the culpret.  Use the following:

foobar: "Mr. Foo Bar <zchi@mit.edu>

                 --jrh

-- 

James R. Hamilton                            inet: jrh@jrh.guild.org
telephone: +1 416 493 4162                   uunet: ...!uunet!jrh!jrh
Toronto, Canada                              work: jrh@torolab.vnet.ibm.com
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
From: kannan@oar.net (Kannan Varadhan)
Subject: 2 questions on mh-format and scan
Organization: OARnet, Columbus, OH.
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 05:11:47 GMT


I am using mh 6.8, with the following setup:

version: MH 6.8 #3[UCI]  (valhalla) of Mon Jan 25 10:25:46 EST 1993
options: [ATTVIBUG] [BIND] [BSD42] [BSD43] [DBMPWD] [DUMB]
         [FOLDPROT='"0700"'] [LOCKF] [MHE] [MHRC] [MIME] [MSGID]
         [MSGPROT='"0600"'] [RENAME] [RPATHS] [SENDMTS] [SMTP] [SUN40]
         [TYPESIG=void] [VSPRINTF] [ZONEINFO]
	
Question 1:  According to the manual, %{folder} is a valid component
for scan listings, which gives me to understand that I should see some
output for the following command:

	% scan -format "%{folder}" +inbox last

but all I get is a single blank line.  Where am I going wrong?

Question 2:  I am trying to coax a numeric argument to be left
justified, but to no avail.  For instance, I want to output "+inbox/41"
for the 41st message in +inbox, and "+inbox/141" for the 141th with just
one mh-format.  Is this possible?  (easily? :-)

Thanks for any help at all,


Kannan
-- 
Kannan Varadhan,		1224, Kinnear Road,	+1 614 292 4137
Internet Engineer (OARnet)	Columbus, OH 43212	+1 614 292 7168 (FAX)
From: Jym Dyer <jym@mica.berkeley.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh,comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: MH aliases
Date: 29 Jan 1993 00:05:33 GMT
Organization: The Naughty Peahen Party Line
NNTP-Posting-Host: remarque.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: shankar@sgi.com's message of 21 Jan 93 00:45:57 GMT

> Sendmail will happily generate
>
>    John Q. Public <public@host>,  or worse,
>    John Public (guest) <public@host>.

=o= A nit:  the second one isn't worse.  It's perfectly legal
to have comment between the phrase and the mailbox.
    <_Jym_>
From: kudzu@netcom.com (Michael Sierchio)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: How do I add a header item in the 'comp' template?
Summary: want to add 'Return-Receipt-To:' and 'X-Fax:'
Date: 26 Jan 93 19:29:19 GMT
Organization: True Love, and Home-Grown Tomatoes

I have failed at attempts to add lines to my headers in compositions. I would
like the blank header I see upon doing a 'comp' to be:

To:
cc:
Subject:
Return-Receipt-To:
X-Fax:
--------

Rather than model my errors, I'd rather just see something that works.

Thanks much.
-- 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Michael Sierchio                          1563 Solano Avenue, Suite 123 |
|  kudzu@netcom.com                                Berkeley, CA 94707-2116 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: rtor@ansa.co.uk (Owen Rees)
Subject: Re: MH aliases
             <1jkro5INN2e3@fido.asd.sgi.com>
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Date: 21 Jan 93 10:19:01 GMT

Shankar Unni <shankar@sgi.com> writes:
> Sendmail will happily generate
>
>    John Q. Public <public@host>,  or worse,
>    John Public (guest) <public@host>.

The second of these is a legal RFC-822 address [the full stop isn't
part of the address], the "(guest)" is a comment and should be treated
as white space. Following the general rule for robustness in RFC-1123:
  "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send"
the address should be accepted, but sending it is unwise.

# Owen Rees <rtor@ansa.co.uk>
# APM, Poseidon House, Castle Park, Cambridge, CB3 0RD, UK
# Phone: + 44 223 323010  Fax: + 44 223 359779
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
From: jpw@sansfoy.lib.virginia.edu (John Price-Wilkin)
Subject: Re: piping to a filter (one more piece of info)
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 16:36:26 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.144107.27409@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>  
jpw@sansfoy.lib.virginia.edu (John Price-Wilkin) writes:
> I'm trying to have mail with a specified subject piped through a filter  
[text ommitted]
> Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?  I'm afraid it's awfully  
> simple-minded, but I'm stumped.  Incidentally, I'm using MH 6.7 "UCI  
> Version" on the NeXT.
> 


A followup.  Several of my previously sent messages came back, and they  
had the perhaps useful piece of information:

slocal: missing argument to -user
554 "| /usr/local/mh/lib/slocal -user $USER"... 554 unknown mailer error 1

I've since tried with a change to the .forward substituting my login id  
for $USER, but this doesn't seem to help either.

John Price-Wilkin
jpw@Virginia.EDU
jpw@sansfoy.lib.virginia.edu (NeXTMail)

Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh,comp.mail.sendmail
From: per@erix.ericsson.se (Per Hedeland)
Subject: Re: MH aliases
Nntp-Posting-User: per
Organization: Ellemtel Telecom Systems Labs, Stockholm, Sweden
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 14:11:20 GMT

In article <PATRICK.93Jan21211802@delphi.Stanford.EDU> patrick@casbs.Stanford.EDU (Patrick Goebel) writes:
>On a related note, I often see addresses of the form
>
>firstname.lastname@host.domain
>
>If I try to make such an alias in our /etc/aliases file (SunOS 4.1.1
>using sendmail), I run into all sorts of trouble.  If I'm not
>mistaken, having a "." before the "@" violates one of the format
>rules.

As has been pointed out by others, it doesn't, but - you aren't by
chance putting the entire 'firstname.lastname@host.domain' in the LHS of
the alias file, are you? That will typically only work with IDA
sendmail, which takes special care to deal with such "non-local
aliases". For others, you just put 'firstname.lastname' in the alias
file, and make sure the .cf recognizes 'host.domain' as "local".

Then there's the issue of getting sender addresses to be generated in
the above form, of course, i.e. "reverse aliasing" - certainly doable
with Sun's stock sendmail, but takes a bit of tinkering...

--Per Hedeland
per@erix.ericsson.se  or
per%erix.ericsson.se@sunic.sunet.se  or
...uunet!erix.ericsson.se!per
From: chary@head-cfa.harvard.edu (Sumitra Chary)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: slocal
Date: 28 Jan 93 16:55:08 GMT
Organization: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA,  USA




Hello,

	I am using the slocal program to filter and deposit my mail
into specific folders. I happened to run out of disk space in my home
directory where the folders reside. Where does the mail sent to me
during this time go??. There are a few lines of e.g. "number empty"
in my inbox which lead me to believe that these were mail messages
that could not be incorporated into my folder. 

Will it get back to the sender? ..i haven't been able to track it
down anywhere yet.

Thank You.

======================
Sumitra Chary                 
chary@cfa.harvard.edu
From: sowa@amdew.llnl.gov (Erik C. Sowa)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: Re: Looking for character-oriented windowing front-end for MH
Date: 22 Jan 93 18:37:32 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: LLNL Chemistry and Materials Science
In-reply-to: rob@leland.Stanford.EDU's message of 21 Jan 93 04:02:13 GMT

>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Tanner <rob@sherlock.stanford.edu> writes:

Rob> Is there some kind of window oriented front-end for MH that can
Rob> manipulate a VT100 screen?

Emacs the all powerful!
--
erik sowa (sowa@amdew.llnl.gov)
Xref: sparky comp.mail.mh:1551 news.answers:5455 comp.answers:17