HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl)
Subject: Re: Definitions
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 21:09:32 GMT
Distribution: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM Rochester

In article <1992Aug27.151257.18794@usho93.hou281.chevron.com>, jviv@usmi01.midland.chevron.com (John Viveiros) writes:
|> Word #1 
|> A system of government characterized by rigid one-party dictatorship,
|> forcible supression of the opposition (unions, other, especially
|> leftist, parties, minority groups, etc.), the retention of private
|> ownership of the means of production under centralized governmental
|> control, belligerant nationalism and racism, glorification of war, etc.

Let's see, it could be one of these three:

    FASCISIM, REPUBLICANISM, PAT ROBERTSONISM, REAGANISM???
 
|> Word #2
|> Giving Freely, generously.
|> Tolerant of others views, broad-minded
|> Favoring political reforms tending toward democracy and personal freedom
|> for the individual.

    LIBERAL (what an evil word these days.  Orwell would have called it 
             CRIME-SPEAK!!  Don't forget to add CONGRESS and TAX&SPEND
             when using in public)

|> Licentious (morally unrestrained -- oh well JJV)

    GEORGE BUSH!!

As expected, most threads on alt.fan.dan-quayle don't even
mention the little weasle.  Maybe we should start 

     alt.dan-quayle.in.title.but.not.in.threads
     rec.conservative.bashing (quite fun)
     talk.halcion.rumors
     alt.abortion.ad.infinatum

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Jared Dahl             | "My heart is human, my blood is boiling, | 
| Systems Programmer     |  my brain IBM"                           |
| IBM - Rochester, MN    |              -- STYX,  "Mr. Roboto"      |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Opinions expressed are mine, not IBM's.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sgrenander@NASAMAIL.JPL.NASA.GOV (Sven Grenander)
Subject: Re: "Liberal" - A Misnomer
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 17:43:58 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.152054.2050@wkuvx1.bitnet>, barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:

..........

>   ...............................I don't think Quayle's as stupid as
> everyone says he is (first off, it's just not possible he's lived 40
> years if he's _that_ dumb), etc.  .................................

You are quite right, he has to be even more stupid or he would have been
smart enough to do the world a favor and retroactively abort himself.

..........

>  ...........  But I don't think liberals in general are the bogeymen.

You are right again, the TheoFascists are the really terrifying ones.

..........
> 
>                                  -Jeff (AKA Fred the Infamous)
> 
> (yes, I know some of my letters are signed Fred; just don't ask!)
> 
> 

Ok Jeff or Fred or whoever you think you are today, I guess I misjudged
you - it turns out that we really do agree with each other. How nice !

-Sven
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl)
Subject: More than meets the eye
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 16:12:52 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM Rochester

     I despise JDQ, and up till last night I though he was a fool
and an idiot.  While watching him on PRIME TIME LIVE, Quayle was
exposed for what he really is:  a back-room deal maker hiding under
the guise of a simple idiot vp.  In my opinion, JDQ has been acting
stupid, saying stupid things, and just looking clueless on purpose
to draw the media away from his real intentions.  The "Competitiveness(sp?)
Council" that he chairs has been deregulating many industries,
including removing pollution controls, airline deregulation, squashing
unions, and quite a few other things.  And they meet in SECRET!  And when
Sam Donaldson pressed him about these things, Quayle responded sharply
and intelligently, denying any wrong-doing, and stating that everything 
they had done was within the law.

     I don't believe that JDQ is a fool anymore, I think that he is a
dangerous, cunning politician who has placed himself a heart-beat away
from a weak (halcion controled) old man.  I think that WE are the fools,
for letting him get away with this idiot routine for so long.  Dan Quayle
has a radical right agenda for America, and we (Repubs, and Dems alike)
cannot let him put it into place.

Jared "Or he could be Pat Robertsons bag-man" Dahl
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Jared Dahl             | "My heart is human, my blood is boiling, | 
| Systems Programmer     |  my brain IBM"                           |
| IBM - Rochester, MN    |              -- STYX,  "Mr. Roboto"      |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Opinions expressed are mine, not IBM's.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello)
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Reply-To: bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 18:47:53 GMT


In a previous article, popec@fennec.sccsi.com (William C. Barwell) says:

>Well, it looks like Bush 'n' Quayle's Convention Bounce has piddled away 
>to nearly zilch, and I think the boys are going down the crapper.  The 
>election is a little over two months away.  
>  So what is going to happen to this thread when Dan is gone?  Who are we 
>gonna laugh at?  [...]

Oooh... good point!  It's a chilling though, but come Jan 20, 1993, ol'
Dano will be playing golf FULL TIME!  I suppose Pat "Himmler" Buchannan will
still be around.  He's pretty amusing if you like dark humor.  And I suppose
Dan will be making appearances in those "People/News of the Weird" columns
(e.g., Former Vice-President Attacked by Caddie).

We'll just have to carry on, I suppose.

-- 
Brad Corsello (bsc7@po.cwru.edu) 2L Case Western Reserve Law School
"The Fanaticks have always had a way of affecting to run into Per-
secution, and count vast Merit upon every little Hardship they suffer."
^ J. Swift.  "Factum clarum, jus nebulosum."  Rex v. Haddock.
From: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Double messages on abortion
Date: 29 Aug 92 00:42:50 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

In article <AeZwVWC00iUzM1u4Vi@andrew.cmu.edu> jsa5+@andrew.cmu.edu (Joshua M. Sabloff) writes:
>Buchannan?  Ya, he would pick Hitler's corpse to be his running mate. 
>With Mussolini as his secretary of state.
>

If Buchannan picked any corpse as his running mate, he would probably
pick Marilyn Quayle...
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: grimoire@byron.u.washington.edu (John Greer)
Subject: Deja vu..._bad_ deja vu...
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 21:00:08 GMT

Since the beginning of this farce - uh, election campaign, excuse me -
I've been haunted by a sense of deja vu every time George or one of his
stooges made a public statement.  The most annoying thing is that I 
could tell that the fit wasn't quite perfect...but i couldn't recall
what it was reminding me of.

Well, the penny finally dropped.  Remember those Isuzu commercials 
from a few years back, the ones with the subtitles that said (He's
Lying) and things like that? 

It's perfect.  Imagine it:  Bush gets up at the podium, and starts into
the usual slime...and the subtitles come on.
    "...I support an absolute ban on abortion."
         (Except for his family, of course.)
    "...I support a balanced budget amendment."
         (He's never even _submitted_ a balanced budget to Congress.)
    "...We stand for family values..."
         (This meaningless phrase covers his real agenda.)
    "...and for the real America."
         (Of, say, circa 1870.)
    "...And I'm proud to say that I know that J. Danforth Quayle is
    fit to take my place if the need should arise."
         (He's lying.)

Me, I'd love to see it.  Anyone from the Clinton/Gore campaign reading
this group?

-- JMG

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Subject: Re: Taxes
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 19:00:23 GMT

In article <94497@bu.edu> grue@csa.bu.edu (Philip Libin) writes:
>
>I'm sick and tired of hearing the Democrats whine about how George
>Bush lied on his promise of "no new taxes".  The fact is that a great
>many people are paying less taxes now than they did four years ago.
>Sure the rich got some breaks, but MILLIONS of middle and lower-income
>Americans are paying less taxes too!!
>
>
>	(they're unemployed)
>
>Lets give George Bush credit where credit is due.  He kept his
>promise.
>

BZZZTT!  Wrong again!  The figures I've seen say that SOME people
are paying less in FEDERAL taxes while others are paying more,
but the level of taxes (including local and state income taxes and sales
taxes) as a percentage of GNP has increased slightly during the Bush era.
True, one cannot blame the Bushman for this, but let's not give
him credit for a tax reduction that did not occur.

BTW, this same percentage remained almost constant during the
Reagan years.  The Great Tax Cut which Dan-o and the Republicans
are always honking about as the cause of the "boom" of the 1980's
did not really occur; the taxes were merely shifted from
the federal level to local levels.

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |   "Winning cures everything."          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |     -- The Fabulous Sports Babe        |
| sieferme@u.washington.edu |                                        |
From: Bucky.Whaley@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Bucky Whaley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Tucker's e-mail
Date: 3 Sep 92 17:59:35 GMT
Organization: Extended Bulletin Board Service

Ronnie B. Kon (ronnie@cisco.com) writes:

> ... Don't bug Tucker.  (sort of the new a.f.dq slogan)

BTW, read in a posting to soc.motss that while every Lehigh student
gets a computer account, alt groups aren't supported.  So we aren't
bugging Tucker even obliquely here on alt.fan.dan-quayle.


Bucky Whaley                             "Release the hounds..."
bucky.whaley@bbs.oit.unc.edu             - Montgomery Burns, passim
sowhaley@ecuvm.cis.ecu.edu
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  bbs.oit.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
From: dianem@boi.hp.com (Diane Mathews)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: 1 Sep 92 21:54:42 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Hewlett-Packard

>not to mention all those Aryan-Nationalist in the Northwest, they
>will be thrilled to do battle with some no-so-white economical conscripts
>from the inner city of LA, NYC, and Detroit.  

This is soe embarassing!  Right here in Idahoe.  I was once one of the twoe
token liberals in Montana (which will probably goe for the bushman), and
now it looks as thought I'm one of the 8 token liberals in Idahoe.  Marylin
was here, this was about a month agoe.  She told me that since Idahoe is
soe family oriented she'll count on our support in November.  I'm a really
bad woman, because I work, and I'm really really bad because I'm single.
She said soe, soe it must be true.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bwatson@nyx.cs.du.edu (bruce watson)
Subject: Re: AN ANAGRAM!!! WE HAVE ONE!!!
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 19:25:39 GMT

In article <3FiRPB1w164w@monsoon.com> sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta) writes:
>s5202734@titan.ucc.umass.edu (s5202734) writes:
>
>>     Many years ago, isaw the following anagram (I don't recall the source, so
>> no attribution):
>> 
>>    Spiro Agnew <===> Grow a Penis
>
>The guy who discovered this one is (get this) Dick Cavett.
>
>Sunil Gupta
>Monsoon Software, Inc.
>sg@monsoon.com

Did he discover it? I heard him say it on TV but was it original with him?

--
Bruce Watson  wats@nyx.cs.du.edu  Toy Cows, Toy Cows in Africa, Toy Cows
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: anne@cco.caltech.edu (Anneliese Lilje)
Subject: Re: "I can even forgive Bush for Dan Quayle, but not for this."
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 23:24:33 GMT

In article <Z26DqB6w164w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>jason@ab20.larc.nasa.gov (Jason Austin) writes:
>>
>>       I don't think you understand the magnitude what happened.  It
>> was more than anyone would have expected and the system was just not
>> prepared.  It's no ones fault when everyone's doing the best they can.

I don't agree with this at all. It was NOT "more than anyone expected".
130+ mile an hour winds are devistating to all but very sturdy structures
(bricks, concrete blocks, steel girders, etc). The system was not
prepared because the system doen't work. It's broken.

>> A hindsight argument that Bush should have predicted this and prepared
>> is ridiculous.  It's not even Bush's job to monitor each state's
>> emergency preparedness.  This is just another liberal scam to take
>> advantage of people's pain for political gain.

States, although they their own rights and boundaries are still part of the
bigger picture...the U.S. In the case in Florida, the disaster was/is
so big that it would have been unbelievable to think that state funds
and services could have taken care of it all.

>You've got to live somewhere where hurricanes are an annual threat to your
>community to appreciate just how wrong you are on this one.  Hurricanes are not
>earthquakes;  you get anywhere from 48-96 hours warning that one of them is
>going to whack the US.  Where specifically it will hit may be in doubt, but
>that 48-96 hours warning ought to be sufficient time to begin staging federal
>disaster relief.  You also get 48 hours' warning as to how big the storm is

Absolutely. IF it was a strong catagory 3, 4 or 5 this should be automatic.

>amount of federal help, mostly from the military after such a disaster.  That
>the Bush administration couldn't see this coming, and in of all years an
>*election year* is unbelievable.  You'd think at least that the campaign team
>would see this as a way to show that things are running smoothly on Bush's
>watch.

I have always considered myself a republican. Until the last 4 years. I 
don't want to have any part in getting George Bush into the White House
for the next 4 years. I don't care who I vote for...but it ain't gonna
be the republicans this time. How sad.

anne

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush
From: andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman)
Subject: Re: DATELINE: Bush fucks up!
Organization: /usr/lib/news/organizatoin
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 23:30:00 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.151340.9052@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> ack@dgp.toronto.edu (Andrew Brownbill) writes:
>In article <1992Aug27.185934.15283@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug27.130233.7176@news.uiowa.edu> williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams) writes:
>>>And my unscientific opinion is that there is one major cause for
>>>unwanted pregnancy: ineffective birth control.
>>
>>That unscientific opinion seems to have little basis in this reality.
>>
>>Few of the "teen" pregnancies are due to ignorance or inaccessible
>>birth control, let alone failures.  They're the natural consequence of
>>sex by people who WANT to get pregnant or don't care whether or not
>>they do.  Unless someone is proposing some sort of mandatory birth
>>control (norplant?), birth control policy can't affect that.
>
>I just want to get this right. Unwanted teen pregnancies are caused by people
>who want to get pregnant. 

Right.  The fact that society doesn't want these pregnancies or that
the pregnancies aren't wanted after they're started doesn't imply that
they were unwanted when they were started.

Why do so many teens want to get pregnant, or not care whether or not
they do?  I don't know, but until we change that, we're going to have
lots of teen pregnancies.  The alternative isn't nice.

-andy
--
UUCP:    {arpa gateways, sun, decwrl, uunet, rutgers}!cs.stanford.edu!andy
ARPA:    andy@cs.stanford.edu
From: stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: 31 Aug 92 23:19:15 GMT
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens

In article <1992Aug31.221643.5142@peponi.wcc.govt.nz> hobbs_a@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz writes:
>In article <1992Aug29.074142.27342@athena.cs.uga.edu>, stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton) writes:
>>Ah sir  you mourn the loss of this fair group, but keep your shoulders
>>straight, your spirits up and your vision straight ahead, for as long 
>>as there are Americans, there will be idiots in power equally as easy
>>to ridicule as Danny Boy.
>
>Is it just me, or does this overoptimism scare other people too? I think it's
Overoptimism? Actually my previous post was drippingly sarcastic but I
guess that doesn't translate too well over the net.


>more than likely that King George and Dan-Oe will be re-elected. Republicans
>have gotten too good at voter manipulation to give up now. Who knows what they
>have up their sleeves? Another round of Arab shooting? Invasion of Cuba,
>perhaps? Or maybe a debt-induced recovery? I fear, good people, you're
>underestimating the scum.
Scum? Yes.  But over here there is a definite feel for Clinton.  I appreciate
your attention to the issues but you don't live here and know how frustrated
the masses actually are with the President.  I mean, you see stuff on tv
but you don't go into a local grocery store here in the US and see people
discussing outright at cash registers what an idiot quayle AND bush are.
I've seen that.

>Mind you... if they do lose (which I doubt... *sigh*) do you realise we're
>going to have a VP arguably more intelligent than the president? Maybe we can
>start an alt.fan.tipper. That should be fun.
Again, I DO appreciate your paying attention to all of this, but how can
you be in a position to know just how frustrated Americans are with these
clowns.  You may doubt it but you don't have all the facts, not living
IN this country.

>anthony (not an american, and glad)
catherine (wishing she lived wherever anthony does)
From: dks@athena.mit.edu (dks)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: "I can even forgive Bush for Dan Quayle, but not for this."
Date: 31 Aug 92 14:51:02 GMT
Followup-To: alt.politics.bush
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

In article <bmty_1+@rpi.edu>,
jacksonk@polaris.cs.rpi.edu (Keith Jackson) writes:
>In article <9208301418.AA16516@MIT.EDU> dks@MIT.EDU (dks) writes:
>> ATLANTA, GEORGIA, U.S.A., 1992 AUG 28 (NB)
>>  -- by Dana Blankenhorn
>>
>> [Blankenhorn's article deleted for brevity]
>>
>  [Keith Jackson's comments on the media deleted for brevity]
>
> Wow!  It's all George Bush's fault!  It's so perfectly obvious!  Well, he
> must be punished now.  YOUR A NAUGHT BOY! <Spanking motions a la John
> Clesse>
>
> GET REAL!  You must be getting pretty desperate to have to attack Bush on
> this issue (gee, I'm starting to sound like Willie).  Clinton himself is
> getting desparate (only 6 pts up in the latest polls, within the margin of
> error) to have to drag this into the race.  A natural disaster -- and it's
> George Bush's fault.  Rubbish!

I think it's remarkable that you conveniently delete specific (and factual)
charges in Blankenhorn's article and then whine about (i) conclusions which
Blankenhorn did not draw, and (ii) allegations that Bill Clinton did not
make.  As for Bush, no one is blaming him for the hurricane, and you only
make yourself look ridiculous by suggesting that anyone is.  If you did not
get the point of Blankenhorn's criticisms of Bush, read the original post
again (not the pseudo-edited version that you created).

And, finally, don't flatter yourself: you sound nothing like Clinton.


Dhanesh

PS: I don't suppose you'd care to list those "polls" you mentioned.
From: eric@tantalus.dell.com (Eric Youngdale)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle/Bush Competency?
Date: 26 Aug 92 21:07:15 GMT
Organization: Naval Research Laboratory

In article <1992Aug25.224206.25000@uwm.edu> pape@miller.cs.uwm.edu writes:
>Fred, we don't care how much you think of Danno. He's a moron. I don't want
>him taking my order at McDonalds, much less being my VP. 

	Well, I for one would not mind having him take my order at McDonalds.
I don't think that he has what it takes to become the manager, however.
It would beat having him as Veep.

-Eric

	BTW: Last night on the news they said that a Newsweek poll showed
Clinton with 51% and Bush with 35%.  Looks like our man may be flipping burgers
sooner than we think.

--
Eric Youngdale
eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cindy@solan10.solan.unit.no (Cynthia Kandolf)
Subject: Re: family values
Organization: /home/ludviga/cindy/.organization
	<92Aug25.121328edt.142@orasis.vis.toronto.edu>
Date: 26 Aug 92 19:43:37

>>>DEFICIT SCHMEFICIT!
>>>
>>(As long as I'm rich)
>
>not if the US dollar takes a nose dive.

What do you mean, "if"?

-Cindy Kandolf
 cindy@solan.unit.no
 Trondheim, Norway
From: sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Convention Speeches
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 92 13:30:08 EDT
Organization: Monsoon Software, Inc.

dks@athena.mit.edu (dks) writes:

> In article <1992Aug18.161923.181@usho93.hou281.chevron.com>,
> hwcco@chevron.com (Bill Corea) writes:
> >During the Democratic National Convention, the transcripts of the
> >various speeches were posted. Does anyone plan to do the same
> >during the Republican National Convention?
> 
> I have no access to materials from the Baker-Bush campaign.
> If I had, I would post the texts.
> 
> 
> >I am looking, specifically for the text of the speech by
> >Condoleezza Rice, of Stanford.
> 
> If you find it, please post: it's one of the few "solid" exceptions
> in the sea of verbal diarrhea pouring out of Houston.

Oh really? I suppose then that you agree with her assertions that
Bush deserves full credit for the "collapse of communism" because
it happened on his watch and that the Gulf War was a foreign policy
triumph unequaled in modern times? If you ask me, her speech was
cathartic diarrhea.

Sunil Gupta
Monsoon Software, Inc.
sg@monsoon.com
From: AH.PBL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Mark)
Subject: Re: Murphy Brown Wins the Best Comedy Series and Actress Awards...
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 21:23:03 GMT

In article <01GO8KPK48YACIQZV1@UMAECS>,
VIGNESWA@ecs.umass.edu writes:
>                                        Then the best  comedy series award
>also went to Murphy Brown.  The team behind The Murphy Brown series was on
>the stage.  Two people spoke there.  The gentleman was not political.  The
>lady spoke next thanked the sponsors for stnding by them when things turned
>"dangerous".
  ^^^^^^^^^

  Oh, puh-leeeeze!  "Dangerous."  I'm sure the sponsors have been fighting
  to get a spot when the baby drops out again in the wonderful world of
  reruns.  Has *anything* Mr. Potatoe Head said (accidently or intentionally)
  ever caused a reaction in anyone other than laughter?

  -- Mark
From: saurav@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Saurav Chatterjee)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Mrs. Dannekins
Date: 27 Aug 92 20:57:15 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of California, at Berkeley

sharriso@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven K Harrison) writes:
...
>*man* in office so as to make herself feel better about giving up her
>(successful) career to follow and clean up after her little blond puppy.

A NY Times editorial said that her career never had the potential
of Hillary Clinton's career. Funny how Hillary has a longer paper trail
than Clarence Thomas. 

Saurav