HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: whs70@dancer.cc.bellcore.com (sohl,william h)
Subject: Re: Scanners in Airports and on Planes
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 93 15:11:02 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.052720.5051@w8hd.org> kenh@w8hd.org (Ken Hoehn) writes:
>kenw@col.hp.com (Ken Wyatt) writes:
>>Actually, it's up to the captain as to whether operation of scanners
>>or two-way radios (cell phones / ham radios) is allowed on -his/her-
>>plane or not.  In practice, many airlines have a blanket policy
>>which prohibits the use of this equipment on board.
>
>It is *NOT* up to the captain, or anyone on board the aircraft to decide
>to let a potential electronic device operator utilize a banned piece of
>equipment.  Luckily enough, the rulemakers were smart enough to anticipate
>the problem of an airline captain not being radio savvy enough to
>recognize a potential problem.
>
>IT IS UP TO THE ****CARRIER*****, that is, THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER, to make
>the decision....i.e, Northwest, Delta, etc. officially.  And you can bet
>your britches they will not bet their certificates on letting some geek
>play with his radio on the aircraft.
>
>I have never seen such an issue so continually resurrected....it is
>illegal, and simply not safe to do.  Flying is often scary enough...why
>make it more so?
>kenh@w8hd.org
>Ken Hoehn - Teletech, Inc.         Compuserve: 70007,2374

I agree with the above except to mention that it isn't clear that
radio receivers (eg. scanners) are necessarily banned any more than
the use of a walkman with an FM/AM receiver capability is.  So if the
question is the use of a non-transmitting device, then I don't
know that there is any blanket prohibition against a scanner anymore than
there doesn't appear to be a blanket prohibition against other
"passive" (ie. non-transmitting) consumer electronics such as walkmans,
portable computers, etc.

As to the use of a transmitting device such as a cell phone or
a portable ham radio, I believe they shouldn't ever be used on
a commercial flight as Mr Hoehn correctly points out, even the
captain doesn't have the technical authority to grant permission
to use the transmitter function.

Standard Disclaimer- Any opinions, etc. are mine and NOT my employer's.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Sohl (K2UNK) BELLCORE (Bell Communications Research, Inc.)
Morristown, NJ             email via UUCP      bcr!cc!whs70
201-829-2879 Weekdays      email via Internet  whs70@cc.bellcore.com
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: whs70@dancer.cc.bellcore.com (sohl,william h)
Subject: Re: Frequencies for Morristown, NJ wanted
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 19:19:48 GMT

In article <1k15hfINNbda@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> laborde@oak.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Gregory R. LaBorde) writes:
>I am looking for frequencies in the Morristown, NJ area. Public Safety, Amateur,
>National Park Service, etc. Any would be appreciated. 

Two of the local amateur repeater output frequencies are"

146.895 and 146.985.  Both are very active repeaters, especially
during the morning and afternoon commute times.
The "895" machine is actually in Morristown and the "985" is
in Rockaway, but covers almost all of Morris County.

Standard Disclaimer- Any opinions, etc. are mine and NOT my employer's.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Sohl (K2UNK) BELLCORE (Bell Communications Research, Inc.)
Morristown, NJ             email via UUCP      bcr!cc!whs70
201-829-2879 Weekdays      email via Internet  whs70@cc.bellcore.com
From: ru+@CMU.EDU (Rudolph R. Zung)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Scanners in Airports and on Planes
Date: 26 Jan 93 22:01:21 GMT
	<1993Jan25.132429.10809@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Sponsored account, Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

I believe the FAA prohibits the use of anything that either transmits or
receives RF while on airline planes unless specifically, otherwise exempted
(things such as airline supplied Air-Phones, cockpit radios, etc) It has
something to do with interference with flight navigation comms. Apparently
this is a for-real problem and not some paranoia on the part of the FAA
because there has been reports of flight navs going awry because someone
had switched on an FM radio on the flight; things were restored back to
normal once they tracked down the passenger and had him/her turn off the FM
radio.

--
...Ru     Names and places have been identified to protect the anonymous.
   mcmxcIII
   Make the world a better place.
   Give the gift of kindness.


InterNet: ru+@cmu.edu          BITnet  : rz02+@andrew 
UUCP    : ...!{ucbvax, harvard}!andrew.cmu.edu!rz02+         
R Zung \ (412) 681-6468 \ CMU Box 231 \ Pittsburgh PA 15213
From: mab3474@zeus.tamu.edu (Myles Barkman-KG5AI Tx A&M Univ.)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Using radios in planes
Date: 25 Jan 1993 21:12 CST
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: zeus.tamu.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

These are for wrote from FCC part 97.11
The installation and operation of an amateur station on a ship or aircraft
must be approved by the master of the ship or pilot in command of the aircraft.

The station must be separate from and independent of all other radio apparatus
installed on the ship or aircraft, except a common antenna may be shared with a
voluntary ship radio installation.  The station's transmissions must not cause
interference to any other apparatus installed on the ship or aircraft.

The station must not constitute a hazard to the safety of life or property.
For a station aboard an aircraft, the apparatus shall not be operated while
the aircraft is operating under Instrument Flight Rules, as defined by the FAA,
unless the station has been found to comply with all applicable FAA Rules.

Unquote---
I know these rules are meant for transmitting equipment but for the most part
they apply to any device that had incidental radiation.  Incidental radiation
occurs in any radio which is why you are not even supposed to use your 
Walk Man on a plane.  

Sort of on the same subject, you are not allowed to use your cellular phone
while it is in the air either.  You must use the phone on the plane while
it is airborne.

******************************************************************************
* Namenet   : Myles Barkman   aka 'Scanman'             Texas A&M University *
* Hamnet    : KG5AI          V.P. of W5AC-TAMU ARC        College Station TX *
* Internet  : mab3474@venus.tamu.edu   RACES          Grad-Dec.92            *
* Bitnet    : mab3474@tamvenus           ARES         BS Electronics         *
* Packetnet : kg5ai@w5ac.tx.usa.na         SKYWARN    Engineering Technology *
* ICBMnet   : 30.606 N 96.316 W        I never met a tornado I didn't like.  *
******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: smp@solaria.mil.wi.us (Steven M. Palm)
Subject: 2000 Channels on a Pro-34 ?
Organization: Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:43:57 GMT


I seem to recall a mod from a long time back that allowed you to have
banks of 200, instead of the default 20, channels per bank.  Does anyone
have the particulars of this?

----
Steven M. Palm                   FidoNet, if you must, 1:154/600.0
Milwaukee, WI                    smp@solaria.mil.wi.usa
From: plaws@uafhp.uark.edu (Peter Laws)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: POLICE CALL 1993
Date: 27 Jan 1993 21:49:56 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

> 
> >>Subject: POLICE CALL 1993
> >>...IS HERE!!
> 
> Now, the question:  Which is better, Police Call '93, or 
> Monitor America 2nd Ed?
> 
> Does Police Call have a comprehensive list of frequency allocation
> (ie, commercial, and not just police/fire/air/etc)?
> 
> Mike

  Well!  That's the big question isn't it?  I will let my fellow netters
answer this one because I was a "state editor" for the MonAm,2ndEd.  

  Suffice to say that I have both and wouldn't travel without either!


Peter Laws|GEnie:P.LAWS1| "Finally:  one of our guys is  |plaws@uafhp.uark.edu
n5uwy@ka5bml.ar.usa.noam| driving the car"--Dennis Miller|plaws@uafsysb.bitnet
From: mdonahue@redorc.chi.il.us (Sudden Impaqt)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: For Sale
Date: 23 Jan 93 16:00:38 CST
Organization: Red Oracle Bbs/Network

I have a Uniden BearCar 100XLT for sale.  It has 100 memory slots broken into
10 banks of 10. original antena and also a Telescoping gain antenea come with
it.

Paid about $200 for it a year ago, I'd like to get about $125

I has the Rechargable battery pack and charger with it as well as the leather
carrying case...

Mike Donahue
From: wrigley@u.washington.edu (Bob Ennes)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: PRO-41 mod
Followup-To: alt.radio.scanner
Date: 22 Jan 1993 23:34:30 GMT
Organization: University of Washington
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.95.123.178


I just got a PRO-41 for Christmas and having a good time scanning but I
would like to know if there is modification to allow me to receive 800Mhz. 
Any help would be appreciated.

Bob
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: dlaro@lonestar.utsa.edu (David O. Laro)
Subject: About Alinco's DJ 580 (was Re: Can the ICOM W2A receive CB freqs?
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 20:51:33 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.210816.24113@krk.fi> oh2lak@krksun.krk.fi (Erik Finskas) writes:
>Rod Troch (troch@gandalf.Rutgers.EDU) wrote:

>Expanded RX mod (PowerOn: # + B + Light) allows to enter freqs from 0.00MHz
>to 1310MHz. But this does not mean radio can RX the entered freq.
>I have labbed my radio with a signal generator, and signals can be
>heard from 65MHZ and up. When desired freq at ham radios is abt 145 MHz,
>radios filter can't be called filter if it allows CB signal to go trough.
>Another problem is VCO control voltage. VCO voltage is dependent to frequency
>and at freqs below 50MHz it is way out from desider limits. I think
>W2A has also a somekind of a indicator when it is not actually receiving the
>entered frequency: In 24ET Unlock-situation is impressed with a U-letter
>at memory channel screen (right side from freq)
>
>/Erik OH2LAK

Eric, sorry to remove all that fancy .sig, but I'd like to add a new
element (brand name) to the discussion.  I've heard there's an RX mod on
the Alinco 580 (US model) but wonder if you're familiar with it...and more
yet, is there a TX mod as well?  Any details?

73,
DAVID
Organization: Hidden - I don't speak for them...
X-Stuff:      <This should be witty, but I'm too tired right now.>
Reply-To:     dhorvath@mail.sas.upenn.edu
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 09:37:55 EST
From: David B. Horvath, CDP <MBADBH@rohvm1.rohmhaas.com>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Scanners in Airports and on Planes
Distribution: usa
 <1993Jan26.013504.23194@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>

I've never taken my scanner with me to the airport - I just sit at home
with a large (TV) antenna on the roof and listen in.

I've saved myself lots of time waiting for my wife's plane - when they
told her flight to start orbiting Atlantic City, I knew it would be a
while...

   - David
From: leoh@hardy.hdw.csd.harris.com (Leo Hinds)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Signal Strength meter add-on ... possible?
Date: 21 Jan 93 17:54:04 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Harris CSD, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
NNTP-Posting-Host: hardy.hdw.csd.harris.com


I was wondering if anyone has run across a way (i.e home project) to add a 
signal strength meter to a product that does not have one, in my case a scanner
so that I can decide whether or not I am approaching a signal I am receiving.

A while ago I remember seeing something like that in monitoring times, popular 
communications or some other similar magazine ... did anyone keep that issue?

Thanks

-- 
leoh@hdw.csd.harris.com         	Leo Hinds       	(305)973-5229
Gfx ... gfx ... :-) whfg orpnhfr V "ebg"grq zl fvtangher svyr lbh guvax V nz n
creireg ?!!!!!!? ... znlor arkg gvzr
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: cpssim@te1.cae_domain ([p]Phil Potts's CPS simulation account)
Subject: Re: PRO2006
Reply-To: cpssim@te1.cae_domain
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:35:48 GMT

The little switch on the back is an attenuator. If you find overload does occur
with a near station you can throw in 10DB of attenuation.
Organization: The American University - University Computing Center
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:30:05 EST
From: <ASOLOMO@auvm.american.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Motorola "total security" phone

       I bought a new Motorola cordless phone (America Series 350) because
       of Motorola's claim of "total security" due to signal scrambling, or
       inversion, or something (obviously I'm not a tweek). There's a "demo
       button" on the phone to let you hear what the signal would sound like
       to anyone listening with a conventional scanner: Basically, it sounds
       like some Asian language spoken backward.
          Is there anyone out there who knows how secure this technology
       really is? (Please don't send speculations about what the
       technology _might_ be; I mean, anyone who is familiar with the Motorola
       line and *knows* what it is.) How motivated/sophisticated would someone
       need to be to eavesdrop on it?  I'd really appreciate some informed
       advice.       Thanks!   [Post here or e-mail to ASOLOMO@American.edu]
From: plaws@uafhp.uark.edu (Peter Laws)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: POLICE CALL 1993
Date: 27 Jan 93 00:44:04 GMT
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

> 
> What is Police Call 1993?  Sorry if this is silly but I'm just getting  
> into this.
> 
> Thanks
> Blake Edwards
> edwardsb@ucs.byu.edu
The famous movie producer?!?  Of Pink Panther fame?!?

  Police Call is, to paraphrase publisher Gene Hughes' ads, the "most
widely purchased VHF/UHF radio guide in America".  Or some such ad copy. 
It's published each year in 9 Volumes, covering all fifty states, and is
available thru Radio Shack. 

  The listings are taken directly "from FCC licenses as they are issued"
and the 1993 edition (just out) has information current thru Oct '92. 
PoCa is long on frequencies, callsigns (each Tulsa, OK Fire Department
firehouse is individually licensed for instance), and transmitter
locations, but short on which channel is what and how the system is used,
etc. 

  A good book, all in all.  Only $10 at RadSha.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the guy looking for Morton (PA) PD freqs:
From Monitor America, 2nd Ed.:

  The Morton PD uses Delaware Co. Police "Tac 1" (West Secondary) 39.82
MHz.  
  The other DelCo. freqs are:
Tac 2 39.90
Tac 3 39.78
Tac 4 39.50
Tac 5 39.60
Tac 7 45.54  

  According to the book ($25-1.800.scan701), a new 500 MHz system is being
installed, so this may all be wrong. 

  No, I am not going to type in all the new 500 Mhz freqs! 

Peter Laws,
Associate Editor, (Arkansas)
RCMA _Journal_



Peter Laws|GEnie:P.LAWS1|"Finally: one of our guys is    |plaws@uafhp.uark.edu 
n5uwy@ka5bml.ar.usa.noam| driving the car"--Dennis Miller|plaws@uafsysb.bitnet
From: jbolar@terapin.com (Jeff Bolar)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: PRO 34 mods
Date: 26 Jan 93 07:17:35 GMT
Organization: BBS

Are there any mods to my PRO 34 that I should know about??? Any info would be
greatly app.

ThanX
Jeff Bolar
From: ribarbe@eis.calstate.edu (Richard Eldon Barber)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: FAQ site and archive
Date: 27 Jan 93 01:06:25 GMT
Organization: Calif State Univ/Electronic Information Services

Is there a faq file and archive for this newsgroup?
email ribarbe@eis.calstate.edu
---rick
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: pclark@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Peter Clark)
Subject: Re: Scanners in Airports and on Planes
Keywords: scanner airport planes
Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 02115, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 13:24:29 GMT

In article <1jvsvdINN5h0@mostaccioli.cis.ohio-state.edu> pitonyak@cis.ohio-state.edu (Andrew Pitonyak) writes:
>In article <C1Dsrv.4uE@world.std.com> rcooper@world.std.com (ron w cooper) writes:
>>Does anyone have any experience using a scanner in a major airport?  Do
>>the security guys give you any trouble ?  Are there any rules (FAA etc)
>>that prohibit you from using a scanner on planes ?
>
>Yes, in the Columbus international airport I have brought a
>scanner.  They had me turn it on and show it worked.

Far as I know, the FAA prohibits the use of cellular telephones, HAM
radio equipment, and portable scanners onboard any aircraft.  As far as
the scanners in the airport terminals, I've walked right past Massport
police and Transit Authority police in MA and NY without them even
blinking at my blairing scanner, so I guess it varies from airport to
airport.



-- 
Peter Clark - pclark@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu
            + Empire - it's not just a game, it's an adventure
            + EMACS is computereez for a torture device
From: djc@terapin.com (Don Coco)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: 800 MHZ Trunked Radio Signals
Date: 27 Jan 93 05:29:14 GMT
Organization: BBS

I recieved a comment from a person explaining to me the reason for the data
channel being switch between frequencies.  He told me that it is because the
transmitters need to cool down so they won't burn out.  I thought that it was
kind of an interesting comment.
A glitch has happened to our new trunked system here.  All of a sudden we are
not hearing the tones on our GE system.  The repeater closes and the tones try
to come on but they are not working.  Another friend from this fine group told
me that they have lots of problems with the software in the computers that run
these complicated systems.
From: thomas@mvac23.UUCP (Thomas Lapp)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Anybody heard of Phil Driscoll?
Date: 27 Jan 93 03:47:25 GMT
Organization: MultiVac23, Newark, DE, U.S.A.

riipinen@dxcern.cern.ch (Petri Juhani Riipinen) writes:
> I bought an interesting looking cassette couple of weeks ago. I don't
> remember the name of the tape but the artist was Phil Driscoll. I didn't like
> it very much at first, but then it sort of started catching on...:)
> Anyone else listening to this guy? Anybody seen his concerts?

It was Phil who got me to put earplugs in every one of my coats!
I was working for a radio station at the time, and got a "press"
seating location -- 4th row right in front of the speaker stack.
Phil plays trumpet (kinda like a Christian Chuck Mangione), and
he was playing into a microphone which was amplified.  My ears
suffered damage during that concert, and I vowed that I would never
go to another concert again without earplugs.

But as for Phil's music, I haven't heard anything from him in a
while.  I'm not sure that I've seen it all either, since his music
is more instrumental/inspirational and I don't look at that section
of music that often :-).


                         - tom
--
internet     : mvac23!thomas@udel.edu  or  thomas%mvac23@udel.edu (home)
             : lapp@cdhub1.dnet.dupont.com (work)
OSI          : C=US/A=MCI/S=LAPP/D=ID=4398613
uucp         : {ucbvax,mcvax,uunet}!udel!mvac23!thomas
Location     : Newark, DE, USA
From: kenw@col.hp.com (Ken Wyatt)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Question About Bearcat MR8100 Software
Date: 21 Jan 1993 21:28:06 GMT
Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division
NNTP-Posting-Host: hpcsql.col.hp.com

<SJP117@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> my software, I was wondering if anyone knows what the public/secure toggle
> in the software is for and how it effects recieving.

This toggle either allows (public) or disallowoperator
from making changes to a particular channel entry via the keyboard.
It won't affect receiving.

Ken Wyatt (kenw@col.hp.com)
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 16:11:05 EST
From: <SJP117@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: new england freqs.

Well I was overwhelmed with response for New England freqs. Please either
E-Mail me ( Yeah go ahead) more specific requests i.e. city, agencies, and
I will see what I can do. For now here are some to hold you over.
MassachusettesState Police
42.44 statewide tactical
42.340 eastern mass operations / car to car west
42.400 central mass operations
42.500 southeastern mass operations
42.540 Boston headquarters operations
42.460 western mass operations/ car to car east
159.030 Mass turnpike police
159.240 Mass turnpike maintenance
New State Police Registry units 39.760 Operations

State DPW 47.28,47.26,47.14,47.36
I have much more on Mass if you want it, please get specific!
From: regnad@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Paul Prescott)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
Subject: Re: Non-FM Pirate Radio?
Date: 28 Jan 93 08:04:25 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: The Land of Forgotten Technology
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.ai.mit.edu


Ah yes.  The 3885 AM crowd had a lot to do with both my interest in radio,
as well as in pirates.  It's been a long time, though.  AM activity in
Texas is on 3880.  (And besides, I'm just a lowly technician.)

Paul Prescott
N1AAC
regnad@gnu.ai.mit.edu
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: brewer@anarky.enet.dec.com 
Subject: Re: Non-FM Pirate Radio?
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 14:48:19 GMT


In article <1jhptrINNqsq@life.ai.mit.edu>, regnad@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Paul Prescott) writes...
> 
>I'm just wondering if there is anyone else reading this group who is
>interested in short wave and/or AM pirates/pirating.  I am, and here is
>why.....
> 

	Hi Paul....
	Yes, I am interested mostly in DXing Shortwave pirates. I have 
	been actively listening for/to SW pirates for several years.
	I have about 45 or so stations confirmed via QSL and enjoy the
	whole SW pirate scene.  Its' also turned me on to AM hamming
	and I've operated no 'slop bucket' for 2 years now!!!
	
	There are a couple of other SW pirate DXers who read this
	list...
	/john
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: brian@dsm.fordham.edu (Brian Downing)
Subject: Re: Curious: Idiot's Guide to FM
Organization: Fordham University/CLC, Division of Science and Math
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 13:51:34 GMT

 Shit, if they wrote it then I cannot trust any of the methods they
 provide, damn! ;)
--
 brian...

 brian downing@->fordham university, nyc ny
         brian@dsm.fordham.edu       bdowning@mary.fordham.edu
From: lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org (Mr. Lyn R. Kennedy)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
Subject: Re: FM power calculations needed [forfeitures]
Keywords: FCC Part 15, fines, regulations, forfeitures
Date: 21 Jan 93 15:54:38 GMT
Organization: Radio Amateur k5qwb

ornitz@kodak.kodak.com (Barry x24904/ER/167B-TED) writes:

> I am surprized that Roger, who is an amateur radio operator, should not know
> about this.  QST (the amateur radio magazine) has written about the new fine 
> structure and about a number of amateurs who have received $8000 fines. [For
> some reason, the FCC usually tends to throw in an extra $1000 fine for good
> measure.  Maximum penalties can go to $75,000.]

If memory serves me: The actual maximums for illegal transmitters is 
$10,000 and one year in prison per DAY of operation. The fines are what 
the FCC will settle for without taking you to federal court.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 
73,            internet     | lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org
Lyn Kennedy    packet radio | K5QWB @ N5LDD.#NTX.TX.US.NA
               pony express | P.O. Box 5133, Ovilla, TX, USA 75154

-------------- "We have met the enemy and he is us."  Pogo --------------
Newsgroups: alt.radio.pirate
From: brenckle@scsud.ctstateu.edu (BRENCKLE,NICHOLAS)
Subject: Arizona?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Southern Connecticut State University - Computer Center
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 15:12:00 GMT

Can someone give me a quickie rundown of this Arizona case/ruling? This is
very intersting..

-Nick