HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kurtk@ee.ualberta.ca (Kurt Klingbeil)
Subject: Specific Version: File/Device IO & EMS problems
Keywords: EMS specific
Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 23:35:56 GMT


Having booted a DOS specific version, try 'DIR >NUL' and 'DIR >> NUL'.
Find any 'Invalid handle' or 'Not OS2 Device' messages... ?
Note that redirect-append works to files, to LPTx, to CON, etc. but for
some reason, >>NUL is broken.  (\dev\nul too... natch)    [Works in VDM's]

Try running your favorite 'debug < script' under specific version... NOTE
that linefeeds (of CRLF-as-EOL fame) are no longer quietly ignored, but are
taken to be command-invalidators.  Strip them out, and everything's OK...

Next off, a couple of specific version EMS-related questions...:
1. Does OS2\MDOS\EMM386.SYS accept (and follow) command-line switches?
2. Is 'frame=e000' a valid switch?  If so, why would the EMS frame end up
   at cc00 (first non-ROM location) instead?
3. Is 'x=d000-dfff' (LAN Card) still a valid switch ?   If so why wouldn't
   that prevent the memory range from being used ?  And even more strange,
   why would the frame buffer be (partly) located in this excluded range?

Further to 1., 2., &3., I've observed the following odd ems-related behaviour:
upon bootup, the HIMEM and EMM386 messages both indicate the drivers were
successfully installed.  If EMS is accessed in any way (including Dos5's
mem command) it is reported as available.  Subsequently examining the memory
range D000:0-DCFF:0 with debug will reveal mirrored copies of part of
the SETUP region of the (AMI) ROM BIOS (F000:0-F3FF:0).
What's going on???  At this point no EMS has actually been used, yet the
LAN-card/cum/page-frame region of memory, which was specifically excluded,
appears to contain ROM-oid stuff usually never accessed post POST...

Conversely...  on a freshly rebooted spec.ver.session, If one examines the
D000-DCFF region using debug, one will find the expected LAN-card RAM.
No ROM BIOS, just 00's (and the odd status byte and misc dribbles...).
Having done this, >>PooF<<, EMS is gone.  Somehow, merely accessing the
page-frame region makes it unuseable...

Any Ideas Anyone???    thx, kk
From: "roger ramsey" <roger.ramsey@canrem.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: os/2 win3.1 support
Date: 3 Sep 92 15:09:33 EST
Reply-To: "roger ramsey" <roger.ramsey@canrem.com>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Canada Remote Systems

Richard Anstruther wrote on 09-02-92 regarding UN:OS/2 WIN3.1 SUPPORT:

RA>I believe MS's loud proclamations of Windows 3.1 in 1991 takes
RA>that award.

Nah.  That award really belongs to good ol' Will Zachmann (who was quietly 
padding around the Windows & OS/2 Conference I attended recently) 
vociferously and vehemently trumpeting that OS/2 will take over the 
desktop "any day now" for the last five years.

RA>BTW, did you notice the latest expose of MS's use of undocumented
RA>system calls in Windows to give their apps the inside track over
RA>the competition?  It 's in the latest PC week.

Where?  I have both the August 17 and August 24 issues in front of me (the 
latter arrived yesterday) with nothing on that.  Also, if that were true 
then the FTC would definitely be doing **something** with the information 
and they appear to be strangely reticent.

This leads me to believe that if there are allegations, once more they are 
either sour grapes or hot air.

Roj

---
  WinQwk 2.0 a#473  RAM - Rarely Adequate Memory
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario/Detroit, MI
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: designer@archeteque.Corp.Sun.COM (David Posey)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: os/2 win3.1 support
Date: 3 Sep 1992 22:53:51 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: designer@archeteque.Corp.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: archeteque.corp.sun.com

In article 26327@dosgate, "roger ramsey" <roger.ramsey@canrem.com> () writes:
Richard Anstruther wrote on 09-02-92 regarding UN:OS/2 WIN3.1 SUPPORT:

>RA>BTW, did you notice the latest expose of MS's use of undocumented
>RA>system calls in Windows to give their apps the inside track over
>RA>the competition?  It 's in the latest PC week.

>Where?  I have both the August 17 and August 24 issues in front of me (the 
>latter arrived yesterday) with nothing on that.  Also, if that were true 
>then the FTC would definitely be doing **something** with the information 
>and they appear to be strangely reticent.

>This leads me to believe that if there are allegations, once more they are 
>either sour grapes or hot air.

>Roj

I don't know about PC Week, but this story was in the 9/2/92 business section
of the San Jose Mercury News. MS announced that all calls will be documented
in future releases. Sounds fishy to me...

-David

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: das9674@usl.edu (Stephenson Daniel A)
Subject: Re: Help, I deleted the command shells folder
Organization: University of Southwestern Louisiana
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 05:48:20 GMT

In article <Btpy4B.Gy1@world.std.com> azog@world.std.com (Azog Thoth) writes:
>I accidently deleted the folder that has the OS/2, DOS, and WINOS/2
>shells in them, and now Im feeling pretty fucked. Of course, since I
>just installed my machine two days ago, I havent done a complete
>backup yet, and now am at a loss as to how to get them back without
>reinstalling everything. (using find to find stuff doesnt turn up anything,
>Ive a feeling that not only were the desktop icons deleted, but so where the
>executables)
>
>Thanx
>
>-- 
>Billy D'augustine
>azog@world.std.com
>
>Atari: Power without the price.

Perhaps you could drag a template for PROGRAMs, and tell them to point to
WINOS2.COM, CMD.EXE, COMMAND.COM, etc.  And make a Command Prompts folder
to put them in.

-- 
Dan Stephenson                                           das9674@usl.edu
" BERLIN WALL FALLS.  3 BORDER GUARDS LOSE JOBS.  CLINTON BLAMES BUSH! "
        -George Bush, '92 Republican nomination acceptance speech
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: how use >1024 Zyl. HD
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 15:49:24 GMT

In article <1992Aug30.233401.3295@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry) writes:
>> how can I use more than 1024 Zylinder.        
>> My Harddisk: Microsience HH1060 1314 Zyl .
>> For Dos use is Ontrack Diskmanager available.
>> But on a Ontrack READ/WRITE partion 0-1314 Zyl. (80MB)
>> OS2 2.0 installation stopped with Fdisk-Error
>You can't! There is an inherent limitation in the PC that limits you to
>1024 cylinders (I think it's in the BIOS). These large disks are usually
>IDE drives (maybe SCSI too, haven't had much to do with them) and can usually
>be configured using different configurations of Heads/Cylinders/Sectors. In
>fact I have been told by some manufacturers to use settings that are
>different to the physical layout of the disk because performance will be
>better. The drive automatically detects this and translates all your drive
>references for you.
>Either contact Microscience or a local Hard drive retailer or repairer
>(repair places are usually very willing to give info) and ask for
>alternative configurations for you drive. You might also want to try one of
>the hardware newgroups.

Well, that is not precisely true.

First off, I strongly recommend you enable sector translation on your
hard disk adapter -- most have it.  It works well.

Failing that, OS/2 2.0 will support more than 1024 cylinders, but with
some restrictions.  I believe I list those in the FAQ List.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST is avail. from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/faq.
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | Or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP").
of Chicago, 60637       | Clinton's Arkansas: 49th in Per Capita Tax Burden
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: eletanjm@nuscc.nus.sg (TAN JIN MENG)
Subject: Re: Various OS/2 2.0 problems
Organization: National University of Singapore
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 04:12:54 GMT

widow@camelot.bradley.edu (Shaun Burnett) writes:
: In <1992Aug28.160809.19206@vlsi.polymtl.ca> canty@vlsi.polymtl.ca (Yves Canty (Hiv91)) writes:
: 
: >Something weird about my extended CMOS setup.  I have an option called
: >"Shadow RAM option".  It has 4 possible settings:  Disabled, Main, Video,
: >Both.  When I set it to Disabled or Video, the computer doesn't want to
: >boot anymore.  It says something like "Non system disk or disk error" in
: >DOS, and !SYS0025, !SYS0027 when I try the OS/2 boot disk.  If I set
: >the Shadow RAM CMOS setting to "Main" or "Both", everything works fine, so
: >I selected "Both" to install OS/2.  But even then, I had problems...
: 
: 	Strange, seems like it should be exactly reversed.  You should
: 	turn shadowing off if possible.  OS/2 uses upper memory
: 	itself, so with shadow on you're wasting space.  The problem
: 	may be related to your memory (see below).

It happens on some clones. What happens is that when you try disabling
the shadow, any memory mapped peripherals become invisible. Yours may be
a slightly different problem but is probably in any case related to the
motherboard you have and not OS/2.
 
: 
: >speed at 8 MHz, the error is a file that couldn't be found, but I know
: >it's on the install disk!  When I set the clock at 33 MHz, a trap occurs
: >instead.  Sometimes 0006, sometimes 000d, 000e.  It seems almost random.
: 
: 	Sounds like you may have a bad memory module.  Try using a
: 	program to thourghly check your memory.
: 
: 	Also, I noticed that AMI has a bunch of parameters about
: 	refreshing memory and such.  They may be the cause of your
: 	problems.  I set mine to the defaults found in the manual that
: 	came with my motherboard.
: 
: 	BTW, I believe you mentioned that you have a 486/33.  Is your
: 	RAM speed at least 70 ns?  (80 ns or above is probably too
: 	slow.)
: 
: 	As someone pointed out, OS/2 pushes your hardware to the limit.
: 	Someone also said that OS/2 may be the best program to check
: 	your system components.  Too bad it doesn't have better
: 	diagnostic messages.  ;)

If you're unlucky, it's not your memory modules but your motherboard's
refresh circuitry - in which case - buy a new motherboard.
: 
: Shaun Burnett		    |	"You can't survive on a new planet with a
: widow@camelot.bradley.edu   |	soul full of hope and fresh air you know."
: OS/2--Happy Happy Joy Joy--OS/2		-  Dr. Who (Tom Baker)
: 
: 
jin meng
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry)
Subject: Re: Disk Performance Questions
Originator: parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 04:18:04 GMT

TAN JIN MENG (eletanjm@nuscc.nus.sg) wrote:
> hoppie@kub.nl (Jeroen Hoppenbrouwers) writes:
> 
> : 
> : 3 It seems to me that OS/2 is just doing more than DOS, e.g. keeping
> :   EA's and peeking all files while you open up a folder etc. This means
> :   that raw disk performance will ever be less than DOS. Am I correct?
> : 
> Under HPFS, your EA's are kept together with the file instead of in a
> separate file (as in FAT). Access to the EA + file is thus faster.

I find that if I hide my folders instead of closing them, things are a lot
quicker. The boot up is probably a little slower but I can handle that.

-- 
Tom J Parry.
Your reality is a figment of my imagination.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: petergo@microsoft.com (Peter Golde)
Subject: Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???
Date: 01 Sep 92 22:48:43 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corporation

In article <1992Sep1.080316.27980@umr.edu> ckincy@mcs213c.cs.umr.edu (Charles Kincy) writes:
>
>Now it's your assertion.  Prove that Microsoft wrote a Herc driver.
>

Well, the full source to the driver is in the Windows device driver
kit.  Every file says Copyright Microsoft, none say Copyright Hercules.
Furthermore, 95% of the code is shared between CGA and Hercules drivers.

If you don't believe me, buy the kit yourself.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Subject: Re: OS/2 Win3.1 support *better* than MS!
Reply-To: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Organization: Columbia University, New York
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 05:58:36 GMT

In article <pathak-280892123631@virtual.mitre.org> pathak@mitre.org (Heeren Pathak) writes:
>In article <1992Aug28.044505.2361@news.Hawaii.Edu>,
>tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen) wrote:
>
>> Another case in point is memory boards for PS/2s.  IBM says that the system
>> maximum memory for a Model 70-A21 is 16 Mbytes, yet there is a large number
>> of third party vendors who will sell Microchannel memory boards that support
>> more than 16 Mbytes on this model.  How do they do it?  Do they know something
>> IBM doesn't know?  Or does IBM know something that the third party vendors
>> don't know, like some sort of hidden gotcha when dealing with more than
>> 16 Mbytes on such a machine?  I've asked a local IBMer why these third party
>> folks are able to provide more than 16 Mbytes, whereas IBM says 16 Mbytes is
>> the maximum, but I didn't get an answer.  Why is it so hard to get a straight
>> answer to a simple question?
>
>This is probably more a marketing thing.  A vendors product line is
>generally designed so a certain class of users buy a certain type of
>machine.  By limiting the Model 70 to 16M, IBM is trying to encourage
>people who need more than 16M to buy a different machine.

I wonder if they will wise up when they see that everyone went out and bought
cheaper clones so they wouldn't have to limit themselves to 16 MB.  IBMs,
better?  Sheesh!

 * * * * *  =================== Internet address is  mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
* * * * * * == Meir I. Green == Amateur Packet Radio N2JPG@W2XO.PA.USA.NOAM
 * * * * *  = mig@columbia.edu= Amateur Packet Radio N2JPG@K2KJC.NY.USA.NOAM
* * * * * * =================== Amateur TCP/IP       N2JPG@uhm.ampr.org
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: das9674@usl.edu (Stephenson Daniel A)
Subject: Re: Changing the damn icons (and a lockup question!)
Organization: University of Southwestern Louisiana
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 17:21:43 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.184400.1899@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> pprior@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul A Prior) writes:
>Also, HOW DO I CHANGE THE ICON FOR A SELECTION!!!???  Such a stupid
>question, I know, but I have all these icons and cant get it to change
>them.

What I do is open the icon view of the directory the icon files are in.
(From the 'Drives' folder)  I click on an icon to bring up the ICON EDITOR
for it.  I Select All, and then Copy it.  I close down that icon editor.
Then, I bring up the icon editor for the object whose icon I wish to change.
I Click 'paste' from the Edit menu, and voila, it gets changed.  You save
normally, and it is done.

Yeah, it is cumbersome, but it works.

>Also - is there a way to "migrate" or install a new program without
>going through the migrate icon.  Doing so makes me scan the entire
>disk (400MB) for programs when I already know the directory I want.

I wih I knew.  I wish I could just 'tell' the computer where is was!

>Thanks,

No problem.

>Paul "OS/2 user for 3 days and loving it thus far" Prior
>--------pprior@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu----(614) 621-8240----------------
--
Dan Stephenson                                           das9674@usl.edu
" BERLIN WALL FALLS.  3 BORDER GUARDS LOSE JOBS.  CLINTON BLAMES BUSH! "
        -George Bush, '92 Republican nomination acceptance speech
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: pathak@mitre.org (Heeren Pathak)
Subject: Re: OS/2 Win3.1 support *better* than MS!
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Organization: Mitre Corporation
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 16:44:17 GMT

In article <1992Aug28.044505.2361@news.Hawaii.Edu>,
tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen) wrote:

> You know, every once in a while, I'd really like to find out exactly why it
> is that one company is able to do something that another company can't.  This
> is a case in point.  If IBM is able to make OS/2 run Windows 3.0 applications
> that Windows 3.1 can't run, why or how are they able to do it?  Does IBM
> know something that Microsoft doesn't?  Or does Microsoft know something
> that IBM doesn't?  Will OS/2 users run into hidden gotchas that Microsoft
> already knows about, which might be why they designed Windows 3.1 to be
> incompatible with some Windows 3.0 applications?  Or has IBM found a clever
> solution to a problem that Microsoft couldn't solve?
> 

From what I understand, MS was forced to make Windows 3.1 incompatible with
some Windows 3.0 apps to protect Windows from a misbehaved application.
Since the Windows kernel is located in the same memory space as a Windows
app, the app can cause the entire environment to crash.  MS put firewalls
around the kernel to trap a "bad" application.  This firewall doesn't make
Windows crash proof, it just makes it a bit more crash resistant.

OS/2 doesn't need this "extra" protection.  It all ready gives each process
a separate, protected address space which is enforced by the hardware. 
Thus, IBM can keep the code which lets Windows 3.1 run faster while
throwing out the firewall code. 

> Another case in point is memory boards for PS/2s.  IBM says that the system
> maximum memory for a Model 70-A21 is 16 Mbytes, yet there is a large number
> of third party vendors who will sell Microchannel memory boards that support
> more than 16 Mbytes on this model.  How do they do it?  Do they know something
> IBM doesn't know?  Or does IBM know something that the third party vendors
> don't know, like some sort of hidden gotcha when dealing with more than
> 16 Mbytes on such a machine?  I've asked a local IBMer why these third party
> folks are able to provide more than 16 Mbytes, whereas IBM says 16 Mbytes is
> the maximum, but I didn't get an answer.  Why is it so hard to get a straight
> answer to a simple question?

This is probably more a marketing thing.  A vendors product line is
generally designed so a certain class of users buy a certain type of
machine.  By limiting the Model 70 to 16M, IBM is trying to encourage
people who need more than 16M to buy a different machine.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heeren Pathak                      | Millions long for immortality who do 
pathak@mitre.org                   | not know what to do with themselves
Mitre Corporation                  | on a rainy Sunday afternoon.
(617) 271-7465                     |	               	-- Susan Ertz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Mine not Mitre's.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: swknasri@nuscc.nus.sg (Sriram N (Dr))
Subject: DOS VDM can't see new file in A:
Organization: National University of Singapore
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 05:16:15 GMT


I boot a DOS 5.0 image from C: to access a LAN.  Since I cant
write to C: in the VDM (fsfilter messes the client programs, so I
dont use it), I use the a: drive to transfer data from the HPFS
drive (from other DOS or OS/2 windows) to the LAN.  C is FAT and
D is HPFS.

Curiously, the VDM can't see the new file and the dir statistics
are not correct.  If I exitd the VDM and restart it, it seems to
be ok.  

Any clues?


Sriram


The reason I can't use fsfilter.sys is because I get messages saying
"Bad PROTMAN.DOS" and the like.
From: terryr@michaelangelo.vis.citri.EDU.AU (Terry Robison)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Slow CHKDSK with Connor Drive.
Summary: Slos CHKDSK with Connor drive - HELP
Keywords: CHKDSK, Connor Drive
Date: 25 Aug 92 23:59:42 GMT
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia

Hi,
	I am running OS2 version 2.0 on a 486 - 8 meg memory -
Tseng Lab (1 meg card). 3 1/2 A drive and 5 1/4 B drive.  I used
to have a western digital 85 meg drive formated as HPFS.  ChkDSK
ran with no problems.  I needed more space and bought a 170
meg connor drive and formated it with HPFS, drive C 45 meg (where
all the system sits), drive d 16 meg used only for swap, and
drive e for programs and data files.
	The problem is with chkdsk - I had to do a check disk and
it lasted 20 25 min on drive e, almost 10 min for d... get the
picture.  I turned on my machine this morning and it took 10 min
to start up - IT did a check disk on my swap drive for some reason.
	I have installed the new kernal, fixes for the video card,
and the dreaded black icon. I have also installed the new com fixes.
Any ideas?

	Terry
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: zhao@unixg.ubc.ca (Jiansheng Zhao)
Subject: cann't access to other dos partition!
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 05:12:30 GMT

Hi, 
I have a problem with os/2 accessing other drive (partitions). I tried from
drive icon-view to access to my c: and d: drives, c: is a dos partition and
d: is my second hard drive (dos). However, the icon-view automatically closed
without showing any file or subdirectory. What's wrong?
Many thanks for any advice.
-- 
Jiansheng Zhao
Dept. Chem. Eng, Univ. of B. C., Canada. V6T 1Z4
zhao@unixg.ubc.ca
From: hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Using Zmodem under CKermit
Date: 24 Aug 92 01:48:33 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Auburn University, AL

In article <1992Aug20.214436.28206@mercury.cair.du.edu>, ssinglet@diana.cair.du.edu (LaserJock) writes:
> I use CKERMIT as my comm program under os/2.  I would like to use the
> OS/2 port of Zmodem for downloads.  I have ckermit set up to use com3:
> on my machine.  Everything works fine until I attempt to shell out to
> the command prompt from kermit and fire up zmodem.  It insists that
> the port cannot be opened.  I indicate in the command line switches
> for zmodem to use com3, disable the carrier detect, baud rate etc,

Kai Uwe Rommel recently suggested trying the options 
  -u 3
and
  -u 5
This seems to work with m2zmodem 2.11. The author of m2zmodem and Os2You
(Mikael Wahlgren) suggests that 
  -f 1
will work. It does on my limited testing. 2.11 does not work under OS2 1.3
and the com16450.sys driver (try m2zmodem 2.09).

I see that m2zmodem 2.13 has been posted to ftp-os2.nmsu.edu in
pub/downloads. I have not tested, but the files seem to be for 2.12.

--darrel hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Out Of Memory, but +3M ram still free.
Date: 28 Aug 92 20:41:32 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <14646@mindlink.bc.ca> George_Lin@mindlink.bc.ca (George Lin) writes:
>When I have a few windows open (about 6) on the desktop, and then I open up a
>seamless windows application, I will often get a "Not Enough Memory" message.
>The windows app will ususally start up and exhibit the following problems:
>1) Can't open any more apps (such as OS/2 Command Line window)

This sounds like the kernel bug people have been mentioning.  Increase
your default swapfile size and see what happens.

>2) An "Out of Memory" error occurs on the windows app.

If you get a Windows-generated out of memory error, it means that the
app has used up the memory allocated to the DOS session that WIN-OS2
is running in.  Try increasing the XMS and DPMI memory for the WIN-OS2
session.  Note that for seamless windows, the first app launched
decides the settings for all other seamless apps that aren't in their
own sessions.

>The strange part is that the screen saver (Kai Uwe Rommel) tells me that there
>are still almost 4 Megs of ram free.  (16Meg total)

WIN-OS2 memory sizes or a Kernel bug.



-- 
   |)  David Charlap           "I don't even represent myself
  /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu   sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
 ((|,)
  ~|~  Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc