HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jck@mercury.ncat.edu
Subject: This has to be a FAQ.  What is the min. $ to start?
Organization: North Carolina A&T State University
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 14:01:00 GMT

It sounds like you guys (generic) have a lot of fun.  I've played with
most of the stuff you talk about execpt the RF part.  I think wireless
is an exciting way to communicate, but need to know where to start.

Before I changed jobs, I was talking to a ham who was going to get me
information on the "technician" class license.  He really prefered that
I go the whole 9 yards (as he had), but I really want to start with 
packet and then ...

Any pointers?  There must be people here in Greensboro, NC.  

Thanks
jck
919 334 7549
From: gambert@screamer.csee.usf.edu (Allen Gambert)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: using the ka9q package
Date: 18 Nov 92 17:37:51 GMT
Organization: University of South Florida at Tampa

I am tring to get the ka9q package to work and am having problems.  I compiled
and installed the package.  What i'm tring to do is test the connection between 
two pc's using the serial ports and slip.  I attach the interfaces as stated in
the manual and start all the services, but when I try to telnet to the other
pc the connection is never made.  What do I need to do in order to use this
package.  The two pc's are connected thru a null modem cable.  I have pins 2 and
3 crossed as well as pins 4 and 5 and 8 and 20.  Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks,

Allen

gambert@sol.csee.usf.edu
Dept. Comp. Science and Eng.
University of South Florida
jhsegal
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Oscar adn other satelites
From: jhsegal@wiscon.weizmann.ac.il (Livian)
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 12:49:51 GMT
Organization: Weizmann Institute of Science, Computation Center

 Hello!
 I don't know if it is the right newsgroup to post it.
 I know there are satelites done by hamradios,which can be used with a
 computer and special hardware.I also know there is a "Email" system
 which works on this satelites,for Hamradios.
 My question is if there is ANY way I can mail a ham radio using this
 satelite,of course without needin a radio transmitter.I want to mail
 the satelite somehow through Internet(or Bitnet??), or,if it is possible,
 to mail the person himself.
 Thanx a lot!
 Livian
 P.S.:
 1.I am talking about the Oscar type satelites.(Or others like it)
2.I know the persons adress.(on the satelite?)
3.The person is NOT connected to Internet,of course.
thanx again.
P.P.S: Please mail the answer to me,not to the newsgroup.
                                   ___
                                  (o o)
 ------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo------------------------------------
  __     __  __    ___ __     _     ___   __
    |      |   \     /   |     \       \    | VM/CMS:
    |      |    \   /    |    _ \       \   | JHSEGALL @ Weizmann.weizmann.ac.il
    |___   |       /     |    _  \    |  \  | UNIX:
        |  |      /      |   /    \   |     |  JHSEGAL  @ Wiscon.weizmann.ac.il
From: kb7uv@panix.com (Andy Funk)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: PACKET ON LANDLINE BBS'S?
Date: 17 Nov 92 01:27:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: panix.1992Nov17.012703.4360
Organization: Panix, NYC

In <9211161607.AA00418@ccsi.com> npalomba@crystal.ccsi.COM (Nicholas Palomba, Crystal Computer Systems Inc.) writes:

>I was asked a question the other day that I couldn't answer. Could a  
>SYSOP of a landline BBS install a "DOOR" that would allow "LICENCED  
>AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS" access a packet gateway through him/her? The  
>sysop being a "LICENCED AMATEUR RADIO OPERATOR" of course.

>-Nick KA1NIP

Sure, but the sysop would be trusting his/her license to the good behavior
of those using the gateway.

Another alternative is what I do with my BBS.  It's primarily a packet
system, but does accept telephone users.  Anyone can call and read
messages, download files, etc.  They can also post messages, but everything
posted is held for my review before it is visible to others (or forwarded).

I have several non-amateurs who call regularly, in addition to many hams
who prefer the speed of a telephone connection at 9600 bps.

73, Andy
-----
    Andrew Funk, KB7UV                     Internet: kb7uv@panix.com
    ENG Editor/Microwave                     Packet: kb7uv@kb7uv.#nli.ny.usa
    WCBS-TV Channel 2 News                      BBS: 718-956-7133

-- 
    Andrew Funk, KB7UV                     Internet: kb7uv@panix.com
    ENG Editor/Microwave                     Packet: kb7uv@kb7uv.#nli.ny.usa
    WCBS-TV Channel 2 News                      BBS: 718-956-7133
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: estey@skyler.mavd.honeywell.com
Subject: Midwest Digital Conference Announcement
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 21:47:01 GMT

Note:  Please give widest possible distribution - Please delete reference
       to price to avoid potential "conduct-of-business" concerns if this
       information is used "on-the-air" as a packet radio bulletin.
       Thanks and 73,
       Carl WA0CQG
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

               MIDWEST DIGITAL CONFERENCE '93 ANNOUNCED                        

     Minneapolis, November 19 - The TwinsLAN Amateur Radio Club of 
Minneapolis/St. Paul announced today that it will host the second Midwest
Digital Conference on Saturday, February 13, 1993.  TwinsLAN president Max
Wendel, N0FKU, said the conference, scheduled from 12 noon to 8 pm, will be
held at the West River Point Business Center, 1315 N. West River Road, in
Minneapolis.  The event will again follow the Midwinter Madness Hamfest to
be held the same day in the Twin Cities.  "This is a perfect opportunity 
for attendees to relax after the hamfest, learn more about digital 
communications techniques and get together with other amateurs" Wendel said.


     Conference chairman Carl Estey, WA0CQG, said the conference will offer
numerous seminars on digital amateur communications.  He said that "last
year's conference focused exclusively on packet radio.  This year we will
address modes such as RTTY, AMTOR, PACTOR and packet with plenty of
information for both newcomers and experts."

     Estey said the topics will include digital operations, getting the most
from a TNC, Local and Wide-Area Networks, and basic and advanced TCP/IP
protocol.  Speakers were not announced; however Estey said he expected some 
well-known digital authorities to lead programs.  A banquet is scheduled
from 5 to 6:30 pm.  A get-together for sysops and netops and a shareware-
software exchange are also planned, according to Estey.

     Tickets are $16.00 before February 13 and $19 on the day of the 
conference; the price includes dinner.  For additional information and tickets,
contact Paul Ramey, WG0G, 16266 Finland Av., Rosemount, MN, 55068, 
(612 432-1640.

______________________________________________________________________________
Carl Estey                  |  Home Mail Address: 276 Walnut Lane
Amateur Callsign:    WA0CQG |                     Apple Valley, MN 55124
                            |  Business Address:  Honeywell Inc.
Phone: Work (612) 542-5136  |  Flight Systems & Test Operations M/S MN15-2370
       FAX  (612) 542-6003  |  1625 Zarthan Ave. S., St. Louis Park, MN 55416
       Home (612) 432-0699  |  Packet: WA0CQG @ WA0CQG.#SOMSP.MN.USA.NA   
The nonsense here is of my own making - no one else would want credit!
From: ag807@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steve Wolf)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: PACKET ON LANDLINE BBS'S?
Date: 17 Nov 1992 02:03:34 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu


Hi ...
     I wrote an article in Radio Fun (November, 1992) that describes the
land-line port we run on our Club PBBS.  It is open to ANYONE, licensed
or not.  We hold any traffic from the annonymous check-in.  If we can
verify the traffic left by the unlicensed user, I change it to go out
under my call as third party traffic.  (Some recently licensed Sysops
have crabbed about such activities ... apparently never hearing of
such things as third party or NTS.)
     We have about fifty licensed people who use the port.  Many new
RF packet operators have started on the land-line port.
73,
Steve
NO8M @ NO8M.#NEOH.OH.USA.NA     216-779-6350

--
From: m14494@mwvm.mitre.org (Mike White)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Pocket Packet recommendations?
Date: 23 Nov 92 20:14:25 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: The MITRE Corporation

I think I want a pocket packet TNC to use with a small Sharp
Wizard organizer; this little puppy has a built in terminal
program; very dumb, but good enough for basic packet.  Anyone
have any experience with pocket-sized packet TNCs?  Anyone
have one they want to sell?  Thanks...

Mike, N4PDY

************************
* These are my opinions only.*
************************
From: axa12@po.cwru.edu (Ashok Aiyar)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: NOS with POP3 server that supports "xtnd xmit"
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 15:58:11 GMT
Organization: CWRU School of Medicine
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: axa12-slip.dialin.cwru.edu
Keywords: POP3, NOS, XTND XMIT


I am looking for a version of NOS that supports the extended POP3 command 
set including the XTND XMIT command which can be used to send mail over a 
POP3 connection rather than a SMTP connection.

Why?

When SMTP mail is sent through the computer running NOS, there is no 
provision to check the identity of the computer that is sending the mail.  
With POP3, since there is password verification, forgery of outgoing 
messages can be much reduced.

Ashok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Ashok Aiyar   Department of Biochemistry, CWRU   axa12@po.cwru.edu
For Internet Access (Telnet/FTP) in Cleveland, contact info@wariat.org
           Telnet to wariat.wariat.org and login as bbs
   Dial (216) 481-9425/9445 (V.32bis) or (216) 481-9436 (2400 bps)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: roman@tix.timeplex.COM (Daniel Roman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Maximum packet length and Pt. 97
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:00:15 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

I've heard as part of HAM radio folklore that the maximum legal packet
length is 256 bytes.  I've had a hard time believing this after looking
through FCC pt. 97 rules or the ARRL version with expanded explanations.
It would seem to me that if you wanted to, you could set up a full
duplex link transmitting/receiving a continuous stream of data as long
as the system(s) ID every 10 minutes.  This is intended only as an
extreme example, not necessarily a practical one.

I've combed through the rules throughly (I think) and can't find
anything to stop me from using let's say a 4K packet size simplex to 
another station set up to do the same.  Anyone have concrete info?

-- 
____________________________________________________________________
Dan Roman           |     ///      Internet:  roman@tix.timeplex.com
Ascom Timeplex Inc. | \\\///                        GEnie:  D.ROMAN1
Woodcliff Lake, NJ  |  \XX/ Only AMIGA!     Homebrew is better brew.
====================================================================
From: sv1bds@leon.nrcps.ARiadne-t.GR (G. Katsimaglis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: PAX uploaded to ucsd.edu
Date: 19 Nov 92 01:22:11 GMT
Article-I.D.: leon.199211190122.AA26414
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

I just upload the PAX.ZIP in ucsd.edu in /hamradio/packet/tcpip/incoming
directory.
73 de
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%           George Katsimaglis  SV1BDS    [ KM17VX ] %
% QRV     : 145200 Khz , RU1 , 7088 Khz              %
% P-mail  : SV1BDS@SV1IW.ATH.GRC.EU                  %
% amprnet : sv1bds@sv1bds.ampr.org      [44.154.1.3] %
% BITNET  : SV1BDS@GRATHUN1.BITNET                   %
% Internet: sv1bds@leon.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr           %
% CIS     : >INTERNET:sv1bds@leon.nrcps.ariadne-t.gr %
% Mail    : George Katsimaglis                       %
%           OITYLOY 13  /  GR11523 ATHENS  /  GREECE %
% Phone   : 0030-1-6494447                           %
% FAX     : 0030-1-3218321                           %
%     > MACEDONIA  WAS , IS and WILL BE GREEK <      %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: gary@ke4zv.uucp (Gary Coffman)
Subject: Re: Subnetting
Reply-To: gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman)
Organization: Gannett Technologies Group
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:19:20 GMT

In article <9211142051.AA27490@chaos.eng.wayne.edu> ron@chaos.eng.wayne.EDU (Ron Atkinson ) writes:
>     AMPR TCP/IP hasn't been subnetted yet in Michigan, but we've talked
>about it and how to do it.  Generally it's by county in most states, or
>some just draw lines and use the BBS  #local  hierarchical areas. The
>H-route boundaries in Michigan are a bit too big for local IP routing,
>and some counties have a very large population, others are farm lands with
>little population.  
>     We'll probably subnet it by county but based on population. If 
>Macomb county had a lot of people in it (or just a lot of hams) then
>we could get the 44.102.0.1 thru 44.102.2/24 range (example only) and
>another county may get more, maybe less.  To determine population our
>IP address coordinator picked up some kind of booklet that had the 
>information in it for each county and the voting information for Michigan.

We initially attacked the problem of subnetting geographically, but found
that to not be completely satisfactory. Physical location and RF connectivity
rarely coincide in our terrain. So we subnet by RF LAN. We have 56 kb, 9600, 
2400, and 1200 baud LANs, and each type exists on several distinct frequencies 
with switch nodes at several different locations throughout the state. Each 
station decides, based on equipment and RF path, which LAN it wants to 
operate in, then it's assigned an address for that subnet. The 56 kb
backbone handles interlan connections automagically. There are still
large geographic areas of the state, where ham population is low or 
uncooperative, that have to digipeat into a LAN to access a high speed 
switch, but that's life in a funds and manpower limited activity.
We hope that the new The Net/IP code will eliminate digipeating in
the near future for those in the hinderlands. We've been stalled trying
to establish a 56 kb link East from Atlanta to the coast for a couple of
years by lack of suitable local manpower to maintain a relay switch
site. On the other hand, we've had little trouble pushing links North
and West from Atlanta into Tennessee and Alabama. Finding local manpower
to maintain parts of a large geographic network is the number one problem.

Gary KE4ZV
From: prg@nessie.mcc.ac.uk (Pete Green)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Build your own TNCs ?
Date: 22 Nov 92 13:13:35 GMT
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre


A friend of mine has recently passed his UK class B licence and is very
interested in Packet Radio. Knowing that I will shortly be sitting my 
licence exams he suggested the idea that we built a TNC as he had heard
that there were some 'public domain' designs.

I would be grateful if anyone who has built their own TNC and is willing
to give me a few pointers on the best way to go forward would email me.

Many thanks,

Peter Green.



-- 
Peter R. Green ------- Tel:+44 61 200 4738 ---- Fax:+44 61 200 4019 -----------
  JANET: prg@uk.ac.mcc.nessie INTERNET: prg%nessie.mcc.ac.uk@nsf-relay.ac.uk   
    POST:  Lab A16, Main Bldg., UMIST University, PO Box 88, Manchester, UK
----------------------- #include <std.disclaimers> ----------------------------
From: JKASSER@STDADS.LAS.LORAL.COM
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Packet Radio Software
Date: 20 Nov 92 18:55:34 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

If you are looking for better software for the PC, try LAN-LINK. I wrote it.
It's available by anonymous FTP from many sites, including Tomcat, and UCSD.
You get a full version with all features and bugs (if any).
It is shareware so you can try it. Once you've tried it, then decide if you
want to register and pay for it, or to purchase shrink wrapped programs that
you cannot try out before you pay money.
Latest version is 2.00A
73 Joe Kasser W3/G3ZCZ
 
 
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: sbrown@charon.dseg.ti.com (Steve Brown)
Subject: Re: Jun's Electronics 
Organization: Really Just Me at Texas Instruments Inc.
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 17:29:28 GMT

In article <SBROWN.92Nov19061347@charon.dseg.ti.com> sbrown@charon.dseg.ti.com writes:

  > However, none of this explains the item bought as new which was in
  > fact obviously not new.

To which J Angus responded:

  Another person that was there when it happened and still neglected to tell
  Axel that he was buying used equipment.

I didn't mean to imply that I got used equipment.  I didn't.  Axel did.
My comment was that my good results did not explain why Axel got used
equipment when he ordered new.
--
              *********************************************
              |  Steve Brown, WD5HCY         | Simplicate |
              |  sbrown@charon.dseg.ti.com   | and add    |
              |  wd5hcy@n5ldd.#dfw.tx.usa.na | lightness. |
              |  (214) 575-3597              |            |
              |  MSG:SBRN                    |    - Bill  |
              |  MS 8496, PSK0               |      Stout |
              *********************************************
From: lucky@ece.iisc.ernet.IN
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: FT-23 Mods for Packet Operation
Date: 19 Nov 92 09:35:01 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu



Here is a mod which you can try out to get your FT-23 working on
packet. The FT-23 handie has an auto-save feature which cannot
be disabled from the keyboard. Hence, a tendency to loose
incoming packets sometimes. Jumper 10 on the control board is used
for the SAVE feature. Disabling this jumper is all you need to
do to shut off the auto-save and get on packet.

73 de Lucky, VU2LBW

lucky@ece.iisc.ernet.in

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: CENG51@maccvm.corp.mot.com (Craig Witkowski)
Subject: Re: 8 Re: BayPac TNC/Modem
Organization: Motorola
Date: 19 Nov 1992 11:09:40 CST

I am looking for the most current version of the Baycom software for the
IBM PC, or another software package that works with a Baycom type modem.  I am
using a Digicom 64 modem converted from my Commodore 64 for use on my IBM
type computer.  Any help would be appreciated


Craig Witkowski, CENG51@maccvm.corp.mot.com      KA2IBV
Motorola Communications & Electronics Inc.
Glen Rock,  NJ

Let's Go Racin'!
**********************************************************************
*                                                                    *
*         **   **  ***     ********   ********  ***      ******      *
*        ***  **  ****      **   **  **    **  ****     **   **      *
*       ** * **  ** **       **     **        ** **    *******       *
*      **  ***  ******   **   **   **    **  ******   **   **        *
*     **   **  **   **  ********  ********  **   **  **     **       *
*                                                                    *
**********************************************************************
                     AMERICA'S ULTIMATE MOTORSPORT!
From: djc@samisen.UVic.CA
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Subnetting
Date: 17 Nov 92 19:33:55 GMT
Article-I.D.: sol.9211172008.AA23671
Reply-To: samisen!djc@sol.UVic.CA
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

Perhaps I'm full of waste - but doesn't classical Internet routing depend
on subnetting by LAN, where a "LAN" is a group of stations that are
directly connected, or within ARP of each other?  Anything else requires
smart routers everywhere, doesn't it?

-- 
/\/\/\/\/\/
Doug Collinge,	try: sol.uvic.ca!samisen!djc
		or:  samisen!djc@sol.uvic.ca
		or:  dcolling@ve7frg.ampr.org
VE7GNU		PBBS: VE7GNU@VE7VBB.#ISLAND.BC.CAN.NOAM
From: npalomba@crystal.ccsi.COM (Nicholas Palomba, Crystal Computer Systems Inc.)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Help please?!?!?!
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:12:50 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

OK, 


Is there some type of publication that will help me with these  
questions: (I have read the PACKET FAQ and GETTING STARTED WITH  
PACKET.)

1.) I there something out there that will explain to me Advanced  
Packet radio. (TCP/IP, AX.25 and "THE NET")

I understand computers and packet radio but I haven't been able to  
find out the ADVANCED PACKET STUFF. I would like to know more about  
connecting my station to the/a TCP/IP network and things of this  
nature. It's kind of like when you get the INTERNET in your office  
for the first time you don't fully understand it. Then you find out  
all these great things to do. I want to find out more about the great  
things out there for PACKET RADIO.

HELP PLEASE,

-NICK KA1NIP

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: gratclif@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Gregory W Ratcliff)
Subject: Re: PK232 "smartwatch" clock mod file
Keywords: mods
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 02:05:56 GMT

I've got a smartwatch that I have no use for. $20.00

Gregory W. Ratcliff

-- 
Gregory W. Ratcliff  Ratcliff.8@osu.edu  on the internet   
Columbus, Ohio     ICBM
nz8r@w8cqk 	 on the air
N1697X     	 in the air
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: Jun's Electronics
From: paul@n3eop.pgh.pa.us (paul)
Date: 15 Nov 92 01:31:37 GMT
Organization: CrossRoads in Elizabeth, PA

aksurf@caltech.edu (Axel) writes:

> I am posting this as a warning to other people regarding the service at a
> HAM radio store in Los Angeles. This regards Jun's electronics on Sepulveda
> in Culver City. 
> 
> Hey, I have had enough of crooks, dishonesty and poor service. I hope this
> will serve as a warning to anyone. Buy only from reputable mail order
> outfits. These local HAM stores are a real dissapointment.

I've purchased many items from Jun's in the past, and will continue to do 
so.  I've found them to give me good service as well as among the best 
prices of any of the mail order places.

Unfortunately, most of the ham stores don't have a return policy as 
liberal as Radio Shack, and most computer stores aren't any better.  A 10 
day return with a 20% restocking fee is the norm anymore, and some places 
won't even accept a return after the ten days.

So, don't single out Jun's; they are following what is more or less the 
industry norm for bottom-price sales outlets.
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: eric@j30264293.reslife.cornell.edu.reslife.cornell.edu (Eric L. Beyer)
Subject: Dopey request..
Organization: The Solaris Development Group
X-Newssoftware: GRn-beta 1.16g (11.15.92) by Michael B. Smith & Mike Schwartz
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 06:18:49 GMT


-- 
	I was wondering if somebody could just give me some very annoyingly basic 
information about amateur packet radio.  I'm interested in possibly setting
myself on a network via radio.  What kind of radio would I need, where would
I get one/price one?  I'm interested in relatively high-speed transfer, though,
if possible.

	Thanks much for any help you can give me.

--
  Eric L. Beyer
  Proud owner of his rusty A500
  Paper pusher of Solaris Devlopment Group

  elb1@cornell.edu
From: a-kevinp@microsoft.COM (Kevin Purcell, Rho)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: KISS and RSPF protocol definitions
Date: 20 Nov 92 00:46:31 GMT
Organization: ucsd usenet gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

Where can I find the definitions of the KISS and RSPF protocols?

73 de Kevin Purcell N7WIM/G8UDP (Seattle, WA)          a-kevinp@microsoft.com
Do your interests match mine? If so call me. I'd like to hear from you.
QRP, Packet, TCP/IP, Digital voice, Macintosh, Spread Spectrum, Homebrew,
Satellites, Antenna design, Propagation, VHF/UHF weak signal, Microwave, QEX