HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
Subject: Re: USR DS v.32bis 10-15% faster thoughput over the Worldblazer
Date: 3 Oct 92 20:45:47 GMT
Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745

john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples) writes:

>In article <BvGJCB.34s@gator.rn.com> larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>>I'm saying 1850 or so -- yes -- with the DTE locked at 56700 baud
>>sending and receiving zipped files with the USR modems verses 1600
>>with the WB modems.

>Well, that's pretty interesting.  Since 1850 is well above the carrier
>rate minus V.42 overhead, it would imply that the USR's V.42bis is
>getting significant compression on compressed files -- while no other
>modem is doing that.  Or the measured transfer rates are not correct.

Since most of my transfers are with uucp I am most concerned about
uucp throughput with the WB using v.32bis against the USR v.32bis.

I just scanned my logs -- 1100-1200 cps using v.32bis on the WB
against 1420-1450 cps on the USR v.32bis for yesterdays calls
(again using uucp-g).

Call after call -- v.32bis throughput with the WB is slower than
the USR V.32bis.  

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: Telebit Qblazer
Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745 
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 18:29:35 GMT

Adam.Frix@p18.f20.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Adam Frix) writes:

>1)  US Robotics modems are very, very fine pieces of equipment.

And provide better throughput over like conditions when using v.32bis

>2)  From what I've seen, the folks at USR understand the word "service"
>    (at least the tech support folks do; their legal department, OTOH...)

Free firmware upgrades for the life of the modem, unlike other vendors
who only ship firmware to correct existing bugs.

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.rn.com
keeper of the Gator                                  uucp: uunet!gator!larry
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,mi.misc
From: hbj@engr.uark.edu (Bernard Johnson)
Subject: Re: Supra's Caller ID (new feature: not!)
Organization: University of Arkansas
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 22:59:28 GMT

mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes:

>With the new CLID-supporting ROMs (1.200G?), Supra will support you if
>you think you're having a problem with the CLID support.  This is why
>you have to pay money -- you are getting a new supported feature.

Ha, ha, ha.  Support from Supra!??  Have you called them and asked for help?
From: Zero.One@p6.f356.n103.z1.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: 40% Discount of ZyXELs
Date: 23 Sep 92 16:19:37 GMT
X-Sender: newtout 0.02 Sep 21 1992

To all who is interested, you can recieve a 40% discount of the purchase of a 
ZyXEL Modem if you submit an ANSI entry and fill out our Contest Form.  You
can get the rules from us at 714-693-0762 or 1:202/701.  The file is
Contest.Zip

Tyrone Horton
(Zero One)
Tech Support
ZyXEL USA

---
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: jeffo@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)
Subject: Re: USRobotics dual 14.4 upgradable to v.fast?
Reply-To: jeffo@uiuc.edu
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 04:17:40 GMT

schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster) writes:
>The new USR's are designed so that all of the support and analog circuitry is
>on a main board near the back, and the DSP stuff on a small daughterboard
>in front.

If the V.fast protocol hasn't been drafted yet, how can any *anyone*
accurately promise V.fast upgrades?

On a related idea, how long do you keep paying for modems and modem
upgrade material until you've spent so much that you could have paid
for something really fast and useable over a long period of time like
an ISDN connection or some sort of ethernet connection to your house?
-- 
-- Jeff (jeffo@uiuc.edu)
-- NeXTmail ok
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: blaby@fraser.sfu.ca (John Edward Blaby)
Subject: Re: Supra New ROM (ordering info)
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 04:31:00 GMT

Hmm..I notice that the latest upgrade still does not include the
promised mnp10. Has anyone heard anything about the lately?

If I am not mistaken, MNP10 is mentioned on the box the modem came in!

John

-- 
 ==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/=
 |Email: blaby@sfu.ca / or / blaby@fraser.sfu..ca / Apple //GS LIVES! |
 | My Opinions are NOT my Fault...They are computer generated.....    |
 ==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/==/=
From: Petty@ralvm29.VNET.IBM.COM (Jack Petty)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 08:03:23 EDT
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Trellis correction
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0

In <kmeyer.09wl@amiganet.chi.il.us> Karl Meyer writes:
>...                 they have Trellis corection. What is this? Is it in
>addition to the v42 and mnp1-4?
>
Trellis coding was invented by Gottfried Ungerboeck of IBM (Zurich lab).
It is a method of encoding data for modulation in a way that adds some
redundancy to the data and in return allows that data to be correctly
decoded by the receiver with a lower error rate than the same data
sent uncoded.  I think of it as a special case of forward error
correction (but note that Toby Nixon of Hayes has said most people do
not consider it to be a forward error correcting code).
Every V.32 modem I know of incorporates Trellis coding.  It is done at
the modulation level so it is in addition to protocols like MNP and
LAP-M.

Jack Petty
From: Roger_Nordin@atb.bbs.bad.se (Roger Nordin)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: USR sportster conversion announcement.
Date: 3 Oct 92 09:26:44 GMT
Reply-To: Roger_Nordin@atb.bbs.bad.se (Roger Nordin)
Organization: ANet Test Bench, Karlstad, Sweden
OD-Comment-To: Internet_Gateway

> the firmware would take a significant investment in disassembly,
> including probably having to develop your own tools (We aren't  
> talking about 80x86 assembly here!).

But we ARE. The SuperVisor ROM is plain and simple 80186 machine code. A 
friend of mine have run this code on his MS-DOS debugger, with AT commands 
working. In short, it is =very= easy to modify the SuperVisor ROM, in order to 
implement a trojan horse or virus.

Btw, thanks for giving this discussion another angle. You pointed out some 
additional ways for a virus to be spread via a modem, which I (and many others,
it seems) hadn't thought about.

                        _       .    __
    Roger Nordin     _ //      /!Net /est Bench
 2:203/602.0@fidonet \X/  Internet: Roger_Nordin@bad.se

--- 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: chris@artcom.de (Christian Hoefig)
Subject: what's ARQ
Summary: Connect/ARQ
Keywords: telebit US robotics connect
Organization: ART+COM e.V., Berlin, Germany
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 16:24:18 GMT

when connecting a telebit 3000  and a US robotics, i see a message
CONNECT 9600/ARQ. could someone highlight this, please ? Yeah, i know
it's in the us robotics manual, since it has an LED for ARQ...must be 
somewhere around here...who had it last...put it where...
background is, i have problems setting up the telebit t3000, but i haven't
tried everything yet (more in a later post).
thanks for your responses
	christian
-- 
Christian Hoefig	       | my phone: +49 30 39 55 719		+
computer consultant 	       | my fax:   +49 30 39 57 713		+
Art+Com e.V.: chris@artcom.de  | my internet: chris@lilli.in-berlin.de  +
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: lazarea@mercury.ncat.edu (Andy Lazare)
Subject: ZyXEL modems (opinions)
Organization: North Carolina A&T State University
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 19:42:09 GMT

my director is thinking of buying ZyXEL modems to use as our dial-ins.
can anyone share your experience with ZyXEL with me. we are getting
the U-1469E's. actually, i just found outthat he has already ordered
them. so can you tell me what we can expect ?

thanks

-- 
Andy lazare                  internet  lazarea@garfield.ncat.edu
n.c. a&t state univ                    lazarea@mercury.ncat.edu
greensboro, n.c.             bitnet    lazarea@atsuvax1.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: FAQ -- define v.32, v.42, etc.
From: robert@hektar.welly.gen.nz (Robert Ruthven)
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 92 05:54:04 GMT
Reply-To: robert@hektar.welly.gen.nz
Distribution: world
Organization: Strange Software

In article <1992Sep20.232651.13064@informix.com> johng@informix.com writes:

 > >I beg to differ:
 > >V.32 - Signalling scheme for 9600 baud over phone lines
 > >V.32bis - Signalling scheme for 14400 baud over phone lines
 > >V.42 - LAP-M error correction, used over V.32 and V.32bis connections
 > >V.42bis - Data compression used over V.42/V.32 and V.42/V.42bis connections
 > >MNP5 - error correction and data compression - proprietary (and older)
 > 
 > what about MNP2,3,4 and MNP10?? what about V.fast??
 > Is there really an FAQ for comp.dcom.modems or what? Doesn't someone
 > actually HAVE a CCITT book that specifiies these standards
 > rather than giving us their (very well intentioned, but sometimes worng)
 > recolections?

Sigh.  [Retrieves CCITT Blue Book from bookshelf]

"V.32: A family of 2-wire, duplex modems operating at data signalling
 rates of up to 9600 bit/s for use on the general switched telephone
 network and on leased telephone-type circuits."      (page 234)

Okay?  Oh, the modulation rate is 2400 bauds +/- 0.01% using either
non-redundant or Trellis coding.

"V.42:Error-correcting procedures for DCEs using Asynchronous-to-
Synchronous conversion."                              (page 296)

This definition goes on for 73 A4-size pages, so I won't be posting it. 8-)
V.FAST (as it has been called by many people) has not officially been
ratified by the CCITT as yet, but is rumoured to do 19.2k over dial-up
lines.  I don't have the additional books for V.32bis/V.42bis.  Sorry!


  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 | Robert Ruthven                         Email: ruthven_r@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz |
 | Wellington, New Zealand                Fido:  3:771/340.5                  |
  ----- "Two is not equal to 3, not even for large values of 2."  Grabel -----

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: lai@seas.gwu.edu (William Y. Lai)
Subject: Re: Trellis correction
Organization: George Washington University
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 04:39:59 GMT

In article <19921005.050320.846@almaden.ibm.com> Petty@ralvm29.VNET.IBM.COM (Jack Petty) writes:
>Trellis coding was invented by Gottfried Ungerboeck of IBM (Zurich lab).
>It is a method of encoding data for modulation in a way that adds some
>redundancy to the data and in return allows that data to be correctly
>decoded by the receiver with a lower error rate than the same data
>sent uncoded.  I think of it as a special case of forward error
>correction (but note that Toby Nixon of Hayes has said most people do
>not consider it to be a forward error correcting code).
>Every V.32 modem I know of incorporates Trellis coding.  It is done at
>the modulation level so it is in addition to protocols like MNP and
>LAP-M.


Hmm, what exactly do you mean by forward error correction?

William Lai


-- 
email: lai@seas.gwu.edu | "I want to do everything.  I want to have everything.
Dept. of Electrical Eng.|  I have a wonderful, wonderful life.  But there's so
George Washington Univ. |  much more out there.  Do I have it all?  Yes.  Do I
Washington, D.C.        |  want more?  Yeah, sure."     -Demi Moore
From: serge.cote@synapse.isis.org (Serge Cote)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: USR sporster can support HST connections?
Date: 22 Sep 92 09:26:00 GMT
Reply-To: serge.cote@synapse.isis.org (Serge Cote)
Organization: SYNAPSE BBS - GATINEAU, QUEBEC - 819-561-4321

To: comp.dcom.modems
From: SergeCote@synapse.isi.org

>yenchee@csie.nctu.edu.tw (Yeng-Chee Su) writes:
>   I've heard the USR sportster would be a 16.8K DS for a long time.  I just
>received one these days, and the parameter doesn't work.  The local dealer
>said the ROM date after 06/18/92 has been deleted the command.  Is it true?

RD>It certainly doesn't work in one from August...

Here is the way to transform your Sportster 14.4k to a Courier 16.8 HST
Dual Standard.....

First thing you need to check your ROM version.  Do an ATI7 and if your
Supervisor revision is 4.1 you are on the good road, if not...forget it.

After that enter theses two lines of code:

        ATS11=50V1L3X4&H1&R2&B1E1B0&M4&A3&K3

        ATS14=1S24=150S26=1S32=8S34=0&W

After that modify the Init String of your communication software like
this:

ATGW03C6,22GW05CD,2F

That It! If you type the ATI4 command your will receive a first line
like this:

USRobotics Courier 16800 HST Dual Standard Settings...

Last thing... To force your modem to try to connect to HST before
V.32bis, you need to add B1 to your dialing string...

Good luck!

Serge Cote
---
 . DeLuxe./386 1.25 #7400 . What's happens if I plug this jumper....NO CARRIER
      
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: garyc@lenny.acns.nwu.edu (Gary I. Chang)
Subject: SUPRA - new ROM version 1.2G? 1.2J?
Reply-To: garyc@lenny.acns.nwu.edu
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 00:32:13 GMT

Hi,

	I'm confused. Isn't it TRUE that SUPRA is offering a new 1.2G ROM  
upgrade? And a guy just came out selling the SUPRA v32bis for $265 with
the latest ROM 1.2J???????????

	Is 1.2J an earlier or latter version of 1.2G?

g

--
+----------------+
| Gary I. Chang	 |
+----------------+   NeXT-Mail: garyc@lenny.acns.nwu.edu
Northwestern Univ.      E-Mail: garyc@eecs.nwu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: hm002b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (hasit mehta)
Subject: ARA-SCRIPT for ZyXEL U-1496E
Summary: Need a Apple Talk Remote Access Script for my ZyXEL U-1496E modem
Keywords: ZyXEL 1496 ARA  
 
 ARA scripts and are willing to set aside a few moments either to tell me
    
Organization: University of Rochester (Rochester, NY)
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 92 23:18:03 GMT
Expires: Never
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: T1000 problem
Keywords: connect trouble MNP
Date: 4 Oct 92 23:28:17 GMT
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)

In article <1992Oct3.215432.25571@qiclab.scn.rain.com> 70465.203@compuserve.com writes:
>gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Sep27.021055.11697@qiclab.scn.rain.com> 70465.203@compuserve.com writes:
>>>
>>>A friend has a T100 with *old* ROMs. For some reason, it won't connect
>>>to my T2500 or another local T2500. Both T2500s have the PEP tones *last*
>>>to prevent problems with non-Telebit modems (this is one Fidonet).
>>>
>>>Is this a known problem?
>>>
>
>>Yes, though it's not a problem with the modem.  Your friend needs to
>>set his modem's S7 register to a larger value - 60 or 90.  Your friend
>>also needs to make sure the modem is forced to a PEP-only mode with
>>S50=255.  Then make sure the communications software is waiting long
>>enough to let the modems connect.  Again, 60 to 90 seconds.
>
>You misunderstand. The T1000 is *not* hanging up early. It is just *not
>respomding* to the PEP tones when they finally appear. It just plain 
>won't connect if the PEP tones aren't set first! 
>
>It'll sit there until the *answering* T2500 gives up. But if the PEP tones
>come first, it works just fine.
>

Then you need to make sure the T2500 isn't using an S7 value less than
40.  If the T2500 gives up before it has a chance to issue a full set
of PEP tones, the T1000 won't have a chance to respond.

If that's not it, the net won't be able to help you.  Call Telebit Tech
Support and try some test calls with a technician.  1-800-TELEBIT or
1-408-734-5200.
From: ksthorn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Kurt Stephen Thorn)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Does Gateway Telepath support V.42bis?
Date: 29 Sep 92 21:29:36 GMT
Article-I.D.: Princeto.1992Sep29.212936.16613
Organization: Princeton University
Originator: news@nimaster

The header pretty much says it: does the Gateway telepath modem support 
V.42bis?  How about MNP-5?  Anyone who knows, please help me.  Any other
comments regarding it would also be helpful.

--Kurt Thorn
ksthorn@phoenix.princeton.edu
From: eadie5295@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Intel ->VFAST  ?????
Date: 5 Oct 92 03:50:35 GMT
Organization: University of Northern Iowa


  The Intel 400 has a DTE speed in excess of 115200 bps, whereas most other
14.4k modems have a DTE of 57600.  (I think).  This might lead me to believe
that it might have a teeny bit of potential for V.FAST upgradability.

  Does anyone out there know whether it is or not?
-- 
+----------------------------+               _   _   __   _   _  
|        Trent Eadie         |              | | | | |  \ | | | |
|                            |              | | | | | |\ | | | |
| eadie5295@iscsvax.uni.edu  |              | |_| | | | \  | | |
+----------------------------+              |_____| |_|  \_| |_|
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:14396 comp.protocols.misc:760
From: tnixon@hayes.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.protocols.misc
Subject: Re: Looking for RS-366 specification information...
Date: 3 Oct 92 09:41:01 EDT
Organization: Hayes Microcomputer Products, Norcross, GA

In article <1992Oct2.152512.12341@rdg.dec.com>,
chatel_m@annecy.enet.dec.com (Marc Chatel) writes: 

>    I was wondering if anybody knows something about EIA RS-366. It is the
> first time I hear about this standard, and I wonder if anybody knows more
> than me about it (should not be difficult...).

RS-366 standardizes a parallel autodialer, similar to CCITT V.25.

>    Of course, finding an on-line copy of the standard would be absolute
> gravy...

and illegal, since the document is copyrighted by EIA.  You can 
order a copy through Global Engineering Documents at 
+1 714 261 1455.  Your DEC colleagues in the US can probably send 
you a copy as well.

-- 
Toby Nixon, Principal Engineer      | Voice   +1-404-840-9200  Telex 401243420
Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc.  | Fax     +1-404-447-0178  CIS   70271,404
P.O. Box 105203                     | BBS     +1-404-446-6336  AT&T    !tnixon
Atlanta, Georgia  30348             | UUCP uunet!hayes!tnixon  Fido   1:114/15
USA                                 | Internet                tnixon@hayes.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: goyal@utdallas.edu (Mohit K. Goyal)
Subject: ? about USR modems...
Organization: Univ. of Texas at Dallas
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 02:07:29 GMT

Hello. 

I own a "v.small" USR Courier v.32bis and I am wondering if anyone notices
the same thing I do.

When calling places, even with the volume all the way off, the modem
will emit a high-pitched sound.  This is after it dials but before it
connects.

I find it extremely annoying.

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: johnn@eskimo.celestial.com (John Navitsky)
Subject: Re: Info on Telebit vs ZyXEL please
Organization: =>ESKIMO NORTH (206) 367-3837 SEATTLE, WA.<=
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 12:18:40 GMT

In article <BRkRRB1w164w@mcgort.COM> rlm@mcgort.COM (Robert McMillin) writes:
>johnn@eskimo.celestial.com (John Navitsky) writes:
>
>> I have heard a lot of talk however about the ZyXEL modem and am curious.  It
>> seems that they have a lot of features, but after seeing an add in one of the
>> computer magazines, they look (no offense) cheep.  It also appears that both
>                                             ^^^^^
>
>I have seen this "alternate spelling" of cheap used elsewhere on this
>net.  Is this a refinement of "cheap" in the sense of "shoddily made AND
>inexpensive" or is it just a number of people spelling like chickens :-)?

I think it's the chickens!

-- 
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ||   John Navitsky   `,`,`,`,   e-mail >>  johnn@eskimo.celestial.com  || 
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: leadfoot@bigbootay.sw.stratus.com (Mark Curtis)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: USRobotics dual 14.4 upgradable to v.fast?
Date: 29 Sep 92 00:11:30 GMT

In article <BvAzw8.IvJ@gator.rn.com>, larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
|> leadfoot@bigbootay.sw.stratus.com (Mark Curtis) writes:
|> 
|> >V.fast is released they will want another $299.  For $100 to $150 more
|> 
|> Is v.fast only a firmware upgrade or is more involved?

When I first talked to USR they made it sound like the upgrade was just
a new control ROM.  Their new ads make it look like a plug in daughter
board.  No thing hasn't changed the price $299.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mikes@mentorg.com (Mike Stanbro)
Subject: Re: I love Supra!
Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 17:56:11 GMT

I have called the Supra support line two times.  Both times
I was able to get through and only waited a few minutes
before talking to a support tech.  The people that I spoke
to were helpful and courteous.

The BBS is not the best that I have ever seen but at least
they have one.  I have used it two times also.  It took a
few calls to get through to order the upgrade ROM but I
would assume that it has been swamped with calls as of late.

All-in-all, I rank their support as acceptable.  Combined
with the price of their product, I don't have any
complaints.




-- 
---------------------------
Mike Stanbro                       
Mentor Graphics Corporation
michael_stanbro@mentorg.com
From: gtoal@ibmpcug.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: USR sportster conversion announcement.
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:11:24 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.053512.10555@cs.hope.edu> turkstra@smaug.cs.hope.edu (Chris &) writes:
>	Also, please note that it has also come to our atention that 
>versions of the firmware being disseminated contain disguised code 
>("trojan horse") that may inflict irreperable dmmage to the hard dive of
>the computer utilizing the programs.

Oh, and are *you* writing these viruses?  You can get locked away for
that, you know...

Now pull the other one.  You must think we came up the Clyde in a
banana boat...

G
Oh wait!  This is from a .edu site!  OK, it's a prank posting.
Pretty convincing though.  You almost had me fooled!  Nice one, guys...
-- 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,mi.misc
From: mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst)
Subject: Re: Supra's Caller ID (new feature: not!)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 03:46:22 GMT
Organization: The Programmer's Pit Stop, Ann Arbor MI

In article <1992Sep30.014557.438@jafus.mi.org> matt@jafus.mi.org (Matthew Braun) writes:
>works in V1.200-C of the ROMs.  So basically the free upgraded ROM
>actually disables a feature that we already have, and they now want
>to start charging us for it!

Wrong.  The old ROMs happened to have the CLID functionality in them;
however, it was not a supported feature.  If you were to have problems
with CLID on the 1.200C ROMs, Supra would tell you to go jump in a
lake -- that's not a supported feature.

With the new CLID-supporting ROMs (1.200G?), Supra will support you if
you think you're having a problem with the CLID support.  This is why
you have to pay money -- you are getting a new supported feature.

Have you actually confirmed that the "undocumented" CLID functionality
is no longer present in the free bug-fix ROMs?

-- 
Marc Unangst, N8VRH         | "There are two ways to solve this problem:
mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us   | the hard way, and the easy way.  Let's start
                            | with the hard way."
                            |   - W. Scheider, from a Physics lecture
From: teddy@ut-emx.uucp (Teddy Iglehart [Ted E. Bear])
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Procomm+ Zoom Modem Config.
Date: 26 Sep 92 20:44:06 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin; Austin, Texas

auto-reliable is the one you want....it is where the modem
determines if it connects to the host with v-series or mnp-series
if you notice the other two choices are one in each way meaning
the other is eliminated.




Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems