HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge)
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Keywords: Flame, attraction of moths to
Organization: Paramax Systems Corporation, Paoli PA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 14:58:53 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.060351.24196@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>, rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu 
(Robert Davis) provides a poor substitute for masturbation with:

|> Unfortunately, Billy Boy & Gorey Al  won the election even though the people 
|> did select President Bush and VP Quayle via the popular vote.  What a sad
|> time in history for America and the world this is.  Worse yet, Hillary will
|> also inhabit the White House (soon to become the Red House) and give Slick
|> Willie orders as to how he should run the nation.
|> 
|> America: prepare to impeach Hillwilly & Al before it's too late!


   Like I said, sore loser.

-- 
 _________________________________________________________________________
|                                 |                                       |
| Herbert Rutledge, aka Train     |                                       |
| Paramax Systems Corporation     | "To post is human; to flame, divine." |
| Valley Forge Labs, M/S GVL-3    |                                       |
| P.O. Box 517, Paoli, PA  19301  |                     ---Alexander Pope |
| Internet: train@.gvl.unisys.com |                                       |
|_________________________________|_______________________________________|

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: matta@lclark.edu (Matt Alexander)
Subject: Re: Bye Bye, Dan -- but hello again too soon?
Keywords: Potatoe, tomatoe, Durangoe, etcetero
Organization: Lewis & Clark College, Portland OR
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 21:33:35 GMT

In article <Bx7Kwp.EEJ@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> stcmille@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Stephen C. Miller) writes:
>Well, bye-bye!
>
>Say goodbye, Dan!
>
>(duh) Goodbye Dan!
>
>No, no, Dan.  Say goodbye to the people, Dan.
>
>(duh) where are we going?
>
>We'll be back soon
>
>(duh) when is that?
>
>Pretty soon, man!
>
>(duh) what'll I do 'til then?
>
>You could ...

Clearcut a rainforest... Give your SS men golf lessons... Move to Mars...
I know! You could play with your mexican anatomically-correct doll!

(duh) Oh, joy!

>=
>(former grad star turned rock student)
>Steve Miller	 		    stcmille@silver.ucs.indiana.edu

-- Matt "Boober" Alexander
From: bender@riscee.pko.dec.com (Patricia Bender)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle Quarterly
Date: 6 Nov 92 18:34:06 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard MA


Okay, sigh, I'm going to miss him and the Quarterly would give
me some small reminders of what this country is about to lose.
So, where do I send my request/check for the quarterly backlog?

patricia
From: sgrenander@NASAMAIL.JPL.NASA.GOV (Sven U. Grenander)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Date: 6 Nov 92 22:40:51 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Distribution: usa
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory

rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
 
> I'm a realist who's ancestors were amongst this nation's founding
> fathers.
 
>......bit-bucket filler deleted..............

> with a
> terminal case of rudeness who is conniving and street smart who has a
> disposition as pleasant as a militant feminist afflicted with P.M.S. and
> rabies
 
>......bit-bucket filler deleted..............


Seems like your family has overstayed its welcome.

-Sven
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bena@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Ben Aveling)
Subject: Re: Yes Yes Yes Yes
Organization: Monash University General Access Unix
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 05:49:20 GMT

Herbert Rutledge (train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com) wrote:
: In article <1992Nov4.192348.11246@cas.org>, Scott Park writes:
: 
: |>... the entertainment value will be limitless.
: 
:   Limitless, no.  Just merely asymptotic, approaching infinity.

(-: I can't resist. :-)  Herbert, I've done done maths to 3rd year Uni.
I can't think of a better defition of infinity than limitless.

	Ben (call me flamebait) Aveling
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: twlane@nyx.cs.du.edu ()
Subject: Re: Crazy polls, nutty pollsters
Keywords: Statistics, reliability of
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 22:17:02 GMT

train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge) writes:



>   Well, George, it's over, and it's time to look at how *you* did as
>   compared to those crazy polls by those nutty pollsters.

>   The New York Times average of all of the polls on November 3rd showed
>   Clinton with a 6% lead (margin o' error of 3 points).  Here's the
>   popular vote tally (with 99.2 of the vote counted):

>            George Bush:  38%
>            Bill Clinton: 43%

>   As for the GOP Personal Best, here's how it stacks up:

>            Herbert Hoover, 1932:  41%
>            Barry Goldwater, 1964: 38%
>            George Bush, 1992:     38%
  

You have forgotten the All time most stunning defeat of an incumbent
republican president:

1912: Woodrow Wilson (democrat)      41.8%
      Theodore Roosevelt (prog)      27.4%
      William H. Taft (republican)   23.2%!!!!
      Eugene V. Debs (socialist)     6.0%

-Todd Lane

_|


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Subject: Re: Integrity
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:02:49 GMT
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <carlson.721539119@cwis> carlson@cwis.unomaha.edu (Brian D. Carlson) writes:
>
>	When Clinton spelled Capital in an official government memo, where
>were the English teacher journalists to pounce on him for it?

    I don't know what you're talking about here.  Documentation, please?

    In any case, as has been pointed out before, it's not the individual
gaffes from J. Danforth's mouth that amaze us, it's the sheer,
mind-boggling number of them!  Everyone who speaks a lot makes an error or
two, but Dane has refined the art to hitherto unfathomable realms.

>	Gore thinks the internal combustion engine is public enemy number
>one (yet he rode the campain bus) and nobody barbs at him for his lunacy.

    "Campain"?   From the Quayl unabridged dictionary?


-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ.
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: After 4 years, a good nights sleep...
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 06:08:39 CST
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

> In article <o9k5TB1w165w@mintir.new-orleans.la.us>,
> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) says:
> >KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick) writes:
> >> >Actually, while still essentially conservative, most of the Nixon/Ford er
> >> >judges weren't these whacked-out ideologues we have seen from Raygun and
>
> >> O'Connor, and David Souter, 'whacked-out ideologues'?  What the...?
>
> >Boy, first picking on Maddi, now taking things out of context...you *are* ne
> >here, aren't you?  Time to crawl back to your hole, now.
>
> How is this out of context?  You said that Reagan and Bush appointed
> 'whacked-out' ideologues (which I infer to mean 'conservative and pro-
> life', am I wrong?), and I corrected you.  Please explain how I took
> anything out of context.
>

Given the fact that over 70% of the current federal judiciary were appointed in
the last twelve years, citing two justices appointed is out of context.  Now,
crawl away again.



|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
From: cah@tyr.JPL.NASA.gov (Allen Halsell)
Subject: Re: 1996 GOP Veep Choice (Was: Re: Complete this sentence)
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA/Caltech
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 22:58:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.190041.6137@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>, gsmith@clio.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith) writes:
> In article <D2150056.ia91fg@erics.infoserv.com> erics@infoserv.com
> writes:
> 
> >If we're going to be serious (and, after all, why should we be?), no
> >matter who the Repubs run for the top spot, there's only one obvious
> >choice for Veep: Colin Powell.
> 
> If we're going to be serious, shouldn't we admit that Danny boy isn't
> going to be on the top of any ticket ever?

SERIOUS is one thing we certainly aren't.

As a second point, wasn't Powell born in Jamaica?  I could be wrong,
but if so this would certainly disqualify him from the Presidency
(and therefore the Veep-ship).

*********************************************************************
the only thing that speaks the truth is the eloquence of passing time
               the spoken word is a jacket too tight
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis)
Subject: Re: All I have to say
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 06:20:07 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.171344.10361@utkux1.utk.edu> rdosser@UTKUX1.UTK.EDU (rdosser) writes:
>In article <1992Nov4.151216.15826@rock.concert.net> toddwall@rock.concert.net (R. Todd Wall -- Catholic Diocese of Raleigh -- Computer Services) writes:
>>All I have to say is I'll be voting for Quayle in '96.  Hopefully, Clinton
>>won't destroy the economy to bad until then.
>>
>
>Gosh, it sure would be nice if Quayle was the GOP nominee in '96.
>Without incumbency on his side, I doubt he'd even take Indiana. 
>
As long as the the Western branches of Pravda are controlling the U.S.
mass media, you're right, he won't stand a chance.  Unfortunately.  

As to Clinton's likliness of destroying the economy: in the unusual event
that he doesn't accomplish this on his own, I'm sure that Gorey Al and
Herr Hillary will help him to do so, as will some of his other advisors
and those friends of his, who have hidden in the background, such as
the Rev. Jessie "Ah hates dem whities" Jackson, Mario Coomo (as the
"Rev." Jackson pronounces it), Bella "Let's outlaw religion" Abzug, 
Anita "Ah slept everywhere" Hill, and Sen. Ted "Dunk her in the water"
Kennedy, and the rest of the Tax and Spend, lets Leave America Defenseless
crowd.




-- 
Robert D. Davis            |  VAX/VMS is a text-only adventure game.  If       
rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu  !  you win, you get to use UNIX.  If you fail, 
uunet!mystica!rdd          |  you get to use an IBM-PC running MeSsy-DOS
Telephone: 1-410-744-7964  !  with MeSsy-Windows or an Apple Macintosh.  
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:6460 alt.politics.bush:13489 alt.politics.clinton:16357
From: erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 09:42:44 PDT
Organization: Reigning Cats and Dogs
Reply-To: erics@infoserv.com
Distribution: world
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v1


mazzarel@spam.berkeley.edu (Ariel Mazzarelli) writes:

> erics@infoserv.com writes:

> >rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:

> >> My ancestors were amongst this nation's founding fathers.  You leave...
> >> and take Slick Willie and the Democratic party with you... I'm sure that 
> >> you'd be much happier in Cuba or Russia, where there are still a lot of
> >> communists who are opposing Mr. Yeltsin.  Have a nice trip :-) :-) :-)

> >I'm sure you'd be much happier in Argentina. That's where the last batch
> >of fascists found refuge.

> Ahem.
> 
> Mr. Smith,  I was born in Argentina.
> 
> I have worked with Argentinians.
> 
> Argentinians are friends of mine.
> 
> Mr. Smith,  Mr. Davis is no Argentinian.
> 
> Ariel
> PS:  Sorry,  I just had to defend the national honor.

You're right. My apologies to Argentina. They don't deserve Robert Davis
either.

-----
Eric Smith
erics@infoserv.com
CI$: 70262,3610


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: After 4 years, a good nights sleep...
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 20:59:57 GMT

In article <1djqjcINNo5u@gap.caltech.edu> peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
>sousa_dab@ccsua.ctstateu.edu writes:
>
>>Yes, I slept well last night...
>>But probably not as well as Justice Blackmun (sp?)!
>>Now if only Justice Thomas could be convinced to step down...
>
>I am much more worried about Rehnquist than Thomas.  Any reports
>on Renhquist's health.  How old is he, anyway?

He's about 68, and in good health.  He is a recent widower, and had
expressed interest in retiring soon.  He may, however, choose to try
and wait out the Democrats.




And gentlemen in England now abed
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speak
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day.	   [Henry V, 4.3]
From: KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: If Marilyn has only one life to live...
Date: 13 Nov 92 02:29:06 GMT
 <92317.011245KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> <1992Nov12.140144.2505@gvl.unisys.com>

In article <1992Nov12.140144.2505@gvl.unisys.com>, train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com
(Herbert Rutledge) says:

>  Well, I paid as much attention as anyone laughing hysterically  possibly
>  could.  Marilyn veritably foamed at the mouth as she fulminated against the
>  '60s.  It was definitely the funniest speech of the entire convention.
>  Sample:  "Not all of us dodged the draft."  Remember, this is from Marilyn

I'm sorry, you're right.  I'm a fool.  How HATEFUL she is!  She's a FASCIST!

>  Her rantings to the effect that there were some women who did not want
>  to deny their essential nature as women was one of a piece with the
>  orchestrated attacks on Hillary Clinton prior to the convention that
>  culminated on the opening night.  Marilyn didn't need to denounce Hillary

Yep, there it is.  You are saying that though she didn't come out with it,
you could -infer- that Marilyn was saying "We must HATE all working mothers!
They are -evil-!"  ...or something to that effect, I'm exaggerating of course.

Again, how blatantly obvious!  Though nothing she said resembled what you
inferred, it's still obvious it's what she meant!  Never mind what she actually
said, right?

I recal something more like, we must not ridicule those women who choose to
stay at home and raise their children.  There's no way this implies hatred
for working mothers.

Anyone got a transcript they could post, to clear this up?  I can't remember
every word the woman said.  (Post it without annoying <comments>, please, if
anyone has it.)

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
From: michael@albert.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Complete this sentence
Date: 7 Nov 92 03:17:59 GMT
Organization: Boston University
In-reply-to: mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca's message of 6 Nov 92 21:06:24 GMT

In article <mjenkins.721083984@cunews> mjenkins@alfred.carleton.ca (Michael Jenkinson) writes:
   In <D2150056.hvog4b@erics.infoserv.com> erics@infoserv.com (Eric S. Smith) writes:


   >Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

   >> Naw, we need someone with EXPERIENCE... Nixon/Quayle in '96!!!
   >> The stand-up comedian dream ticket!  :)

   >Sorry to disappoint you; Nixon's been elected twice so he's ineligible.
   >But Ford/Quayle, now there's a ticket with some real quotes file
   >possibilities!

   Then how about Quayle/Nixon?

   Can a two-term president serve again as VP? Or does the amendment
   (can't remember which number) prohibit a two-term prez from ever
   serving at the executive level again in *any* capacity?

   Michael 

The U.S. Constitution prevents anyone from serving as V.P. who isn't
constitutionally elegible to serve as President to begin with,
so Nixon therefore couldn't. He could, though, serve as an executive
advisor, or cabinet secretary, or somesuch. 

I still like NPR's April Fools show this spring:
"Nixon! He's tan, he's rested, he's ready!"

Ciao,
Chaplin.
--
=========================================================================
Michael A. Chaplin           If you want *their* opinions, ask *them*.
michael@albert.bu.edu ....The Einstein Papers Project, Boston, Mass., USA
chaplin@husc.harvard.edu ....Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., USA
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: After 4 years, a good nights sleep...
Date: 8 Nov 1992 19:42:36 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

sousa_dab@ccsua.ctstateu.edu writes:

>Yes, I slept well last night...
>But probably not as well as Justice Blackmun (sp?)!
>Now if only Justice Thomas could be convinced to step down...

I am much more worried about Rehnquist than Thomas.  Any reports
on Renhquist's health.  How old is he, anyway?

						--  Michal

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: crb2@Ra.MsState.Edu (Chad R. Berthelson)
Subject: Re: 1996 GOP Veep Choice (Was: Re: Complete this sentence)
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:15:51 GMT

bx916@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Ross W. Starkey) writes:


>In a previous article, gsmith@clio.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith) says:

>>In article <D2150056.ia91fg@erics.infoserv.com> erics@infoserv.com
>>writes:
>>
>>>If we're going to be serious (and, after all, why should we be?), no
>>>matter who the Repubs run for the top spot, there's only one obvious
>>>choice for Veep: Colin Powell.
>>
>>If we're going to be serious, shouldn't we admit that Danny boy isn't
>>going to be on the top of any ticket ever?

>Everbody's talking about Kemp/somebody in 1996, but isn't Kemp a little
>flakey?  Smart, yes, but flakey.  Kind of like an intellectual Perot?

>I think the 
>GOP candidate in 1996 will be Bennett.  Kemp would however, make
>a dandy VP candidate!
>(But don't rule out our own "beloved" Michigan governor, John Engler, to
>be Bennett's running mate.  That thought is enough to make you go out
>and buy your traveling luggage now, while the stores still have it.
>Bennett - Engler for '96 ... BRRRR!)

I think if someone had to get the endorsment now it would be Bob Dole,
Bennet seemed to jump ship to me (anyone else see him?), I would
love to see Mrs. Carvelle (sp?) (Mary Matalin) make a run for it, I
wonder if ole' Jim would come over (he would sure know Clinton's weak
points...).  If Kemp is gonna get the nomination he is gonna have to 
get more visible and DO something, right now Dole is winning our
hearts.  I think your gonna have people in the running that NOONE has
heard of yet, we'll see...


"Bill Clinton got some good news and some bad news last night...
He's gonna have a homeymoon with Washington, but the bad news is
he's gonna have ole Bob Dole as a chaperon!"

				Robert Dole, Nov. 4, 1992

Gotta love his tenacity (with a capital T)
Chad

--

Chad R. Berthelson		Graduate Research/Teaching Assistant
crb2@ra.msstate.edu		Biological Engineering
cberth@abe.msstate.edu		Mississippi State University
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush
From: liuyh@vis.toronto.edu (Yuanhui Liu)
Subject: Re: at the risk of sounding repetitive...
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Distribution: usa
Date: 5 Nov 92 15:52:31 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.060351.24196@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Robert Davis) writes:
>In article <1992Nov2.050329.7475@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> twillis@ec.ecn.purdue.edu (Thomas E Willis) writes:
>
>>it can only be a government of the people if the people participate.
>
>Unfortunately, Billy Boy & Gorey Al  won the election even though the people 
>did select President Bush and VP Quayle via the popular vote.  What a sad
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I didn't know the didto heads can't compare 2 8 digit numbers before.  

>time in history for America and the world this is.  Worse yet, Hillary will
>also inhabit the White House (soon to become the Red House) and give Slick
                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

you mean like Nancy Reagan?  hopefully Hillary will give a more convincing
argument for changing the Prez's schedule than "according to Madam Zelta".  
>Willie orders as to how he should run the nation.
>
>>may the best candidate win...
>
>He did, but he still lost. :-(  
>
>America: prepare to impeach Hillwilly & Al before it's too late!
>
there's still time to impeach Bush for lying and Danny for being too
stupid.  
>
>
>
>-- 
>Robert D. Davis            |  VAX/VMS is a text-only adventure game.  If       
>rdavis@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu  !  you win, you get to use UNIX.  If you fail, 
>uunet!mystica!rdd          |  you get to use an IBM-PC running MeSsy-DOS
>Telephone: 1-410-744-7964  !  with MeSsy-Windows or an Apple Macintosh.  


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: Have some respect
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:59:07 GMT

In article <BxnynA.8Ln@acsu.buffalo.edu> v115r4q5@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Perry M Jowsey) writes:
>
>   I can't believe the overwhelming disrespect I am constantly encountering in
>this newsgroup.  Perhaps it will take a few months of a Clinton administration 
>for some people to realize it, but Vice President Quayle has been the best 
>political mind in the White House for 4 years, and considering the recently 
>elected crop, there won't be a man to top his stature for years to come.  Did 
>anyone watch the debate and actually believe that Al Gore won? Be real!

This may or may not be an example of the GOP's inability to perceive
irony in the name of this newsgroup.

(Quayle being the best political mind in the WH perhaps doesn't mean
that much, considering the team Bush put together.)


In fiscal year 1991, the government agencies classified as secret a
total of 7,107,017 documents.  This marks the first time that the
total number of reported classification decisions in a year is a
palindrome.		-- 1991 Information Security Oversight Office
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann)
Subject: Top 10 reasons Dan's Fans post here
Organization: Society for Putting Things on Top of Other Things
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 19:57:40 GMT

TOP TEN REASONS DAN QUAYLE'S SUPPORTERS POST TO ALT.FAN.DAN-QUAYLE

10. Our irreverence enrages them
 9. alt.fan.pat-buchanan was rmgrouped
 8. Cognitive dissonance from *agreeing* with everyone on a.f.rush-limbaugh
 7. Hoping CIA operatives read a.f.d-q and will write nice things about
      their loyalty under fire
 6. Tucker is paying them $100 per supportive message
 5. Need something to do while waiting for tee-off
 4. See Dan as a role model for success with a 2.16 GPA
 3. They lost the spelling bee in third grade for "potatoe," too
 2. Heard that a.f.d-q was part of the "media elite"

 1. They haven't yet figured out that most of us think Dan is stupid
-- 
Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer.  Take your pick.

Centigram Communications Corp, San Jose California  408/428-3553