HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: peter@global.hacktic.nl (Peter Busser)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD?
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 00:55:27 GMT
Organization: Global Village 1

drew@ladymacb.cs.colorado.edu (Drew Eckhardt) writes:

>>>want). Installing UNIX is simple? Forget it!

>The last commercial Unix I installed from scratch, I stuck the CDROM in 
>the drive,booted it, answered a few questions about what licenses I had 
>and what products I wanted installed, and it told me to come back in X minutes. 

Nice! I've always installed either from floppy or from tape. The last being
NCR System V.4. Almost every package installed needs manual intervention. And
endless recompilation of the kernel is a real pain in the *ss too.

>Under Linux, you boot one of the "easy to install" disk sets, answer a few
>questions regarding where you want it and what you want installed (ie, X,
>etc) and it just happens.

I know, it's easy after partitioning the harddisk...

>>Just buy a machine with pre-installed UNIX. Or ask the shop to install it
>>for you. Is that difficult ?
>Most workstation vendors will ship with the OS already installed, just as 
>most PC vendors ship with DOS / Windows installed.

That's nice! Except when your vendor ships the wrong operating system. That is,
DOS...

Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: asriniva@vela.acs.oakland.edu (MONK)
Subject: BACKGROUND PROCESS
Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 23:46:22 GMT

hi folks

Could someone clear me this doubt.

man anything > testfile & 
repeat the following statement no of times
man anything >> testfile &


The output file testfile does not seem to contain the output of the man page
required no of times, some of them seem to get lost. 


email responses to asriniva@vela.acs.oakland.edu
thanks
-- 
_________________________________________________________________________
athi			
_________________________________________________________________________

Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: pkim@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu (Paul Kim)
Subject: Help on CU command
Keywords: CU
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 15:28:33 GMT


 
Hi,

I am not sure if this kind of question goes on this group.

I am trying to download some files using cu command on Unix.
The baud rate is 9600. It seems to work ok with 2400baud but
with 9600 I get following errors:

------------------------------------------------------------
[/usr/tmp/cn] ls -l
total 109
-rw-------  1 pkim       46082 Nov  5 08:34 motif.Z
-rw-------  1 pkim       63518 Nov  5 08:35 motif.e

[/usr/tmp/cn] sh
stty -echo;if test -r motif.e; then (echo '~>':motif.e;cat motif.e;echo
'~>'); e
lse echo cant\'t open: motif.e; fi;stty echo
1234+
575 lines/35286 characters
------------------------------------------------------------

I typed '~%' to initiate the download  and type 'take motif.e'.
But it ends without completing entire download.
It only downloaded 35286 characters instead of 63518 characters.

Could someone familiar with cu command tell me what I am doing wrong?

Thanks in advance.

Paul
pkim@descartes.uwaterloo.ca

Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: jeffj@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (jeffrey.n.jones)
Subject: UUENCODE help!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 17:32:29 GMT

I am having a heck of time with uuencode. If I do the format that it calls
for, uuencode file remotefile, I get a screen full of ascii characters.
Rather then into remotefile. Then is seems after this happens uuencode 
dies and won't do anything other then "begin 666 qlist.z" and that's it.
This happens on all files I try it on. I have had the same problem on
this maching, on my SUN, on a UNIX box and even on my PC using a this
uuencode. HELP!

Jeff
-- 
 Jeff Jones  AB6MB         |      If we do not succeed,
 jeffj@seeker.mystic.com   |      then we run the risk of failure.
 Infolinc BBS 415-778-5929 |      Vice Pres. Dan Quayle
Xref: sparky comp.unix.questions:13282 news.software.nntp:1494
From: IETAM@ASUACAD.BITNET (Thom Anthony McCarty)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,news.software.nntp
Subject: cron not finding script
Date: 10 Nov 92 17:28:34 GMT
Organization: Arizona State University


I am executing a Bourne shell script, newsrunning, from within cron.
I have given the absolute filename (including the path) but cron says
it cannot find the script:


helpdesk% crontab -l
5,10,20,25,35,40,50,55 * 1-31 * 1-6 '/usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrun'
30 8    1-31 *  1-5     '/usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrunning off'
00 17   1-31 *  1-5     '/usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrunning on'
#40 *    1-31 *  0-6     '/usr/lib/newsbin/batch/sendbatches'
59 0    1-31 *  0-6     '/usr/lib/newsbin/expire/doexpire'
10 8    1-31 *  0-6     '/usr/lib/newsbin/maint/newsdaily'
00 5,13,21      1-31 *  1-5     '/usr/lib/newsbin/maint/newswatch
| mail page'
1,31 *   1-31 *  1-5     '/usr/lib/newsbin/utils/create-desc'


Although the script works from when I'm logged on the "news" account,
I get the following mail when cron attempts to run the script:


From daemon Tue Nov 10 08:30:02 1992
Return-Path: <root>
Received: by helpdesk.inre.asu.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
        id AA09380; Tue, 10 Nov 92 08:30:02 MST
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 08:30:02 MST
From: root (Operator)
Message-Id: <9211101530.AA09380@helpdesk.inre.asu.edu>
To: news
Subject: Output from "cron" command
Status: R

Your "cron" job

    '/usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrunning off'

produced the following output:

sh: /usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrunning off: not found


And here's the kicker; I have given an absolute filename and cron
cannot find it:


helpdesk% ls -al /usr/lib/newsbin/input
total 144
drwxrwsr-x  2 news          512 Oct 29 10:53 .
drwxrwsr-x 10 news          512 Nov  5 10:08 ..
-rwxrwxr-x  1 news        24576 Sep 23 08:55 bdecode
-rwxrwxr-x  1 news        24576 Sep 23 08:55 c7decode
-rwx--x--x  1 news         1499 Sep 23 08:55 cunbatch
-rw-------  1 root        51740 Oct  7 10:32 mail.man
-rwxr-xr-x  1 news         3693 Nov  2 13:03 newsrun
-rwxr-xr-x  1 news          510 Sep 23 08:55 newsrunning
-rwsrwsr-x  1 news        32768 Sep 23 08:55 newsspool
-rwx--x--x  1 news          239 Sep 23 08:55 recenews
-rwx--x--x  1 news          279 Sep 23 08:55 recpnews
-rwx--x--x  1 news         1499 Sep 23 08:55 rnews

Any words of wisdom (or even plain and simple guesses) would be
greatly appreciated.
From: peter@global.hacktic.nl (Peter Busser)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD?
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 12:45:03 GMT
Organization: Global Village 1

ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis) writes:

>For those who like that sort of thing, there you go.

And now for an affordable box...
From: johnv@acix.DIALix.oz.au (John Verhoeven)
Subject: Re: Does anyone have any good insulting acronyms for VMS?
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: 7 Nov 92 08:09:06 WST
Organization: ACix - Private UUCP Node, Cloverdale, Western Australia.

Elizabeth Haley (haley@husc11.harvard.edu) wrote:
> Verifiablely Maniacal System
> Viciously Mangled System
> Vogon Made System
> Vacuous; moreover, stupid.
> Vaxes mostly Suck.

Vomit Making System...

--

John Verhoeven                        johnv@acix.DIALix.oz.au      _--_|\
Treasurer, Amiga Developers           (ALT: johnv@DIALix.oz.au)   /      \
Association of Western Australia      Phone: (+619) 478 1406      *_.--._/

Xref: sparky comp.unix.questions:13123 alt.folklore.computers:15953
From: xyzzy@mertwig.UUCP (Daniel Drucker)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Whence Unix? (was Re: IS UNIX DEAD?)
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 92 15:22:53 EST
Organization: Odd Parity Hacker's Group

twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

> In article <1992Nov5.155838.12398@bilver.uucp> bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermill
> 
> >In article <1992Nov2.123843.2787@global.hacktic.nl> peter@global.hacktic.nl 
> >
> >>UNIX was designed by hackers for hackers (or by programmers for programmers
> >>whichever you like best). But it is flexible, programmable, etc. so it coul
> >>made to a real end-user system. And why not?
> >
> >I thought Unix was written by Bell as a word-processing system
> >to enable them write their the phone company manuals. 
> 
> I heard that, but I also heard that Thompson's *primary* goal was to
> find a machine for playing Space War.  What's the story?

ken had a scavenged pdp-? and wrote Unix (a weak pun on multics) so he 
could play space war.

please correct me if i am wrong!

Daniel Max P. Drucker

=============== mertwig!xyzzy@jaflrn.uucp ==========================
#define slogan_1 Don't pick on me, I'm only 14.
#define slogan_2  Hey! Lets port it to COBOL!

Difficulty! It's the single simplest machine in the entire Universe!
Hi, I'm a .sig virus! Copy me into your .sig and spread the fun!
=========== uupsi!utoday!jaflrn!mertwig!xyzzy ====================== 
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: rahardj@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Budi Rahardjo)
Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD? (long)
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 21:28:44 GMT

papresco@napier.uwaterloo.ca (Paul Prescod) writes:
...
>Why is it, in VI that there is no way (I know of) to get help, or exit,
>without knowing the exit key?  What doesn't "h" in command mode present
>ANY kind of help?

have you ever used 'lvi' (or 'nvi') ?

...
>Where am I supposd to get help about VI?  The man pages tell me nothing
>except how to load it.

Get a good Unix (vi) book/reference card.

>Why do I have 12 function keys on my keyboard that seem to do absolutely
>nothing?

That's on your machine not on mine. My function keys work properly.

>Why doesn't VI use the jkl; keys for cursor movement, since your fingers
>are already on them.  Or why not use keys somewhere far from them.  A
>person can easily get confused.

Hmm.. I can use jkl and arrow keys to move the cursor. What's the problem ?

>Why doesn't help do anything in SH (and others).

Well, 'help' does print a usefull information on my machine.

...
>Why does VI default to beeping at you when you try to type as opposed to
>editing?

Looka at the bottom right on your screen (presumable you are using vedit),
there's the word "INSERT MODE" or "APPEND MODE" or whatever mode you're in.

>Why is it that if I want to WordProcess in VI I have to remember to hit return at the end of the line otherwise bizarre things happen.  Why not just wrap, beep, or slide over (i.e. let the line go long). 

So just set it to wrap it automatically (for example set wrapmargin=10).

>Is there a wordwrap mode in VI?  And if so, why doesn't it kick in when I
>use VI from RN?

set your .exrc file

>Inquiring minds want to know.

Before bad mouthing on vi, and UNIX, read books, magazines, and relax :-)
BTW, why do associate VI with UNIX ? If you don't like vi find something
else, like pico, ce, and zillion of others.
[I can list strange things with MS-DOS, Windows editors. But what's the
point ?]

You seem to have an old UNIX environment.

-- budi
-- 
Budi Rahardjo <Budi_Rahardjo@UManitoba.Ca>
Unix Support - Computer Services - University of Manitoba
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: tony@ais.org (Tony Poole)
Subject: pidentd
Followup-To: comp.unix.questions 
Summary: confused 
Keywords: DEC,5000,Ultrix 
Organization: University of Michigan Computing Club (UMCC)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 02:39:59 GMT



tony@ais.org (Tony Poole) writes:

>Is there any way to link an outgoing IP address connection obtained by 
>netstat to a particular user?
>For instance:
>Active Internet connections
>     
>Proto Recv-Q Send-Q  Local Address          Foreign Address        (state)
>tcp        0      0  141.211.206.17.1711    128.2.10.105.25        SYN_SENT
>tcp        0      1  141.211.206.17.1710    128.59.40.130.3641  ESTABLISHED
>tcp        0      0  141.211.206.17.1707    141.212.2.73.119    ESTABLISHED
>tcp        0      0  141.211.206.17.1701    35.8.8.108.1887     ESTABLISHED
>tcp        0      0  141.211.206.17.23      35.8.2.54.14853     ESTABLISHED
>tcp        0      0  141.211.206.17.1021    141.211.206.16.513  ESTABLISHED
>tcp        0      0  141.211.206.17.1687    137.208.91.6.4000   ESTABLISHED
>Would it be possible to tell which user is connecting to port 4000
>of 137.208.91.6 in the last line, particularly if you know the user is
>connecting via telnet?

In response to this request, I recieved a couple pointers to "pidentd".
This looks like exactly what we're looking for - BUT....

We're unable to get it running properly on a DEC 5000.  Our sysadmin reports
that it runs fine on his Sun 3/50.....not that that does much good.

What we get now is an error message stating it can't open the port, either
port.

I'd be interested to hear from anyone that's gotten succesful results on a
DEC 5000.   (I'd be interested in any helpful hints at all, for that
matter).

Thanks,

Tony


-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Poole                       tony@umcc.ais.org * tony@irie.ais.org 
Traverse City, MI USA          tony@cherry1.trv.mi.us * tony@cherry1.UUCP
From: philw@vice.ICO.TEK.COM (Philip W White)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: cron not finding script
Date: 13 Nov 92 17:22:09 GMT
Article-I.D.: vice.10753
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, Or.


In article <92315.102834IETAM@ASUACAD.BITNET> IETAM@ASUACAD.BITNET (Thom Anthony McCarty) writes:
::
::I am executing a Bourne shell script, newsrunning, from within cron.
::I have given the absolute filename (including the path) but cron says
::it cannot find the script:
::
::
::helpdesk% crontab -l
::5,10,20,25,35,40,50,55 * 1-31 * 1-6 '/usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrun'
::30 8    1-31 *  1-5     '/usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrunning off'
::00 17   1-31 *  1-5     '/usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrunning on'
::#40 *    1-31 *  0-6     '/usr/lib/newsbin/batch/sendbatches'
::59 0    1-31 *  0-6     '/usr/lib/newsbin/expire/doexpire'
::10 8    1-31 *  0-6     '/usr/lib/newsbin/maint/newsdaily'
::00 5,13,21      1-31 *  1-5     '/usr/lib/newsbin/maint/newswatch
::| mail page'
::1,31 *   1-31 *  1-5     '/usr/lib/newsbin/utils/create-desc'
::
::(mail msg resulting said in part:)
::Your "cron" job
::
::    '/usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrunning off'
::
::produced the following output:
::
::sh: /usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrunning off: not found
::
 Looks to me as if it is trying to run:
/usr/lib/newsbin/input/newsrunning off
 
That is a file name which includes a space.  The space is just before "off".
 
Either try removing the '' around the command, or create a new file
which calls newsrunning with the off argument.  Put the name of
the new file in crontab
 
      Phil White   Tektronix, Beaverton, OR
USENET:  philip.w.white@tek.COM
 US Mail: Mail Stop 59-432, P.O. Box 500, Beaverton OR 97077-0001
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: djweisbe@unix.amherst.edu (David Weisberger)
Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD? (long)
Organization: large
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 00:11:56 GMT

Paul Prescod (papresco@napier.uwaterloo.ca) wrote:
: >Again, vi is not a drop-in replacement for Microsoft Write.  It's
: >an extremely powerful editor of text files.  If you want to whine,
: >consider asking Microsoft why they don't have a command line in
: >their editors.
: 
: Microsoft has a  *PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE* built into word.  I can't
: imagine why someone would prefer a command line to keystrokes
: and requester windows. 	

Try: power.  With a command line, you can do exactly what you want to
do (assuming the requisite knowledge) without being limited and slowed
by predefined options and nice windows.

: >Your lack of attentiveness is simply not our problem.  The bottom of
: >every man page I've seen about 'vi' contains a pointer to the actual
: >vi manual.
: 
: Would you like me to mail you our man pages or will you take my word for it
: that it says nothing about other man pages.
: 
Neither did the previous poster.  "Manual" = offline book.

: If you launch an editor from VI, that editor should be a wordprocessor.  If
: it is vi, vi should be in wordprocess mode.  If it doesn't, that is a flaw.
: 
Not to split hairs, but ha ir we go: there is a difference between an
editor and a wordprocessor.  vi is an editor.  Hey, I even found DOS's
edlin rapid and effective for making specific, small-scale changes.
vi and other editors have that advantage, among others.

: If help does nothing at the command prompt.  That is a flaw.
: 
This is true.

You might find yourself better served by reading up on vi or other UNIX
monsters which baffle you instead of using whatever wordprocessor you
use to pound out your replies to this thread.

--
-Davebo                         "A Freudian slip is when you say one thing
                                 when you're really thinking about a mother."
 djweisbe@unix.amherst.edu               -Cliff the Postman
From: rahardj@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Budi Rahardjo)
Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD? (long)
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 18:06:13 GMT

papresco@napier.uwaterloo.ca (Paul Prescod) writes:
...
>Many, many people don't know there are opearting systems
>other then DOS.  Those that do, usually crinkle their noses if you tell
>them about Unix.  "I heard that has a brutal learning curve."

It's because of people like you who only complain but do not fix the
problem. Hey, I have to deal with hundreds of DOS/Mac/beginner users
to use our UNIX machines every day.
Most of the problem I face is not using the UNIX computer, usually it's
network-related or performance problems/questions. (ie the concept of
networked-machines). 


-- budi
-- 
Budi Rahardjo <Budi_Rahardjo@UManitoba.Ca>
Unix Support - Computer Services - University of Manitoba
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell)
Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD? (long)
Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 05:31:21 GMT

In article <BxGu2H.A62@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> papresco@napier.uwaterloo.ca (Paul Prescod) writes:
>Why is it, in VI if I try to save a file without a name it doesn't prompt
>me for a name? 
[and many more similar questions]

The simple answer is that these programs were written in an era when
computers were expensive and impressive enough that people were expected
to read the manuals before touching them.  While I happen to like vi
(and the other user-unfriendly programs you mentioned), I agree that
times have changed.  No one starting to use computers now is going to
put up with the terse interfaces designed years ago and no one cares
anymore that it is more efficient to be terse. 

>Why don't Unix "tools" have a convention about help and exit keys AT THE
>VERY LEAST.  

This is a little different - the tool functionality kind of depends on
processing to end-of-file (so exit is normally ^D if you are typing
to them from a terminal). And since they are typically used in pipelines
an interactive style "help" wouldn't be available anyway.

Les Mikesell
  les@chinet.chi.il.us
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
From: rwhelan@gmuvax2.gmu.edu (Ryan A. Whelan)
Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD?
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 04:21:18 GMT


>>Does anyone know of an operating system nastier than UNIX,
>>i.e., case sensative, dir does nothing.  Frustration
>>in getting relatively simple programs to run because of library
>>problems.  Having to compile in the first place!!!!! (I want EXEs)
>>Communicating with tape and floppy drives, etc, etc, etc.
>
>I'll bite.
>
>DOS:
>	conflicting TSR's
>	101 different expansion memory schemes
>	virii abounding from transfer of .EXE files
>	640K limit until recently
>	no networking
>	few programs with source to fix bugs that the maker won't
>	ls does nothing.
>	lack of case sensitivity limits number of similar names
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>	inconsistent wildcard expansion
>	3-character filename extension ONLY
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Please don't forget you only get 8 character file names to begin with!
hehe he h with 8 character file names who needs icons?  :)

I hate MS-DOS filing system!


>>It is a sad world when something exists and prospers that makes
>>MS-DOS look user friendly.  (at least with DOS you don't
>>have to do a system manager's course to run it on your own
>>computer).
>
>Unless you want to network, when you need 3 courses to deal with Novell, modem
>direct links, and the other network software the last department bought.
>
>
>-- 
>Pete Hardie:  phardie@nastar  (voice) (404) 497-0101
>Digital Transmission Systems, Inc., Duluth GA
>Member, DTS Dart Team           |  cat * | egrep -v "signature virus|infection" 
>Position:  Goalie               |


-- 
Ryan A. Whelan                      "Repetition does not establish validity."
rwhelan@gmuvax2.gmu.edu                                         - Souder's Law
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.shell
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: How do you cat only the first 50 lines of a file?
Organization: Homosexual Fascist Lobby, Rampant Paranoia Division
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 07:39:21 GMT

In article <Bx98Er.2J9@cs.dal.ca> franklin@ug.cs.dal.ca (Steve Franklin) writes:

>In article <1992Nov5.160507.430@midway.uchicago.edu> lie6@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>
>>How do you, given a long file, cat only the first arbitrary number (say
>>50) lines?
>
>   I don't agree with conserving this to mail. What's compu.unix.* for,
>if not to answer questions, and for newbies to learn? 

Since comp.unix.* includes comp.unix.internals and comp.unix.wizards,
I would say that the entire hierarchy is most definitely *not* there
`for newbies to learn.'  As far as comp.unix.questions goes, though,
you're entirely correct, although the poster would have been far
better served by calling user support at UChi.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu / I use antlers in all of my decorating.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
From: caa@Unify.Com (Chris A. Anderson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD?
Date: 10 Nov 92 17:22:10 GMT
Reply-To: caa@unify.com (Chris Anderson)
Followup-To: comp.unix.questions
Organization: Unify Corporation, Sacramento, California

In article <BxD9vM.MAJ@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> papresco@lambert.uwaterloo.ca (Paul Prescod) writes:
> It's you that doesn't have the clue:  I've said it 100 times.  We need ONE Unixish
> operating system that does ALL of these things.  Telling users: Unix is great because
> Nextstep is easy, and Solaris is graphical, and Linux is free will get Unix NOWHERE!!!
> 
> It's like saying Microsoft products are perfect because Excel is powerful, DOS is popular
> and Windows is easy to use.  The one product has NO effect on the rest!!!
> 
> Excel is expensive, DOS is crap and Windows (well I guess that's crap too!)

Ok.  Fine.  Go do it.

Chris
-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Chris Anderson, Unify Corp.                caa@unify.com  |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,sci.math,sci.math.num-analysis,sci.math.stat,sci.math.symbolic,misc.forsale.wanted
From: paul@gill.uucp (Paul Nordstrom)
Subject: Looking for Time Series Analysis software
Organization: Gill & Co., L.P.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 16:12:42 GMT


Is anyone out there aware of a software package specialized for the
purpose of analyzing time series?  If so, I would very much appreciate
any information you could send me (email is fine).

Thank you very much.


--
Newsgroups: 
Subject: 

-- 
--
Paul Nordstrom
Gill & Co., L.P.
paul@gill.com