HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: plaws@uafhp.uark.edu (Peter Laws)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: License Delays
Date: 11 Jan 1993 22:04:05 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


Read the *whole* post please....

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 11:30:52 +0600 (CST)
From: Peter Laws <plaws@uafhp.uark.edu>
To: "mail --> news" <rec-radio-amateur-misc@cs.utexas.edu>
Subject: License Delays

>Ya know, maybe if we paid more than $0.56/yr for our licenses...

>BUT WAIT!  
>The FCC doesn't even get that!!!!!!!  That goes to the _volunteer_
>examiners.  The _paid_ FCC gets NOTHING.  Nothing but headaches from WHINY
 ^^^|^^^^                        ^^^^^^^---^^^^^^^I stand by this....
    ^ What does this say?  *SO* many people hit the flame-key before
re-reading....

>hams.  

>It's a wonder we get any allocations.

>Here's to a $50, 10 year ticket...

>Peter

Green is right.  Ask hams to even pay a *fraction* of what their license
is worth and see the fur fly!!

Peter...
From: Chuck.Scott@f20.n3603.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Chuck Scott)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: ANYONE HAVE ICOM 7100,700
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 93 22:20:11 PDT
Organization: FidoNet node 1:3603/20 - Mercury Opus NEC360, St Petersburg FL

I am interested in a Scanner/Reciever base model. I saw the new brochure
on the ICOM 7100 it looks interesting. With the TV option, FM stereo
ect. Does anyone have one? I would like to purchase a base in the next
month or so. Been looking at the PRO-2006 and it is a great scanner and
quite a bit cheaper than the ICOMs. I just bought the PRO-43 and it is a
great scanner but I want something I can hook up to my computer when at
home. The interface for the PRO-2006 that Bill Cheek is offering looks
like a great deal. Is there a software program for the ICOMs?
Thanks ahead of time

--  
Internet: Chuck.Scott@f20.n3603.z1.FIDONET.ORG
UUCP:     ...!myrddin!tct!mechanic!20!Chuck.Scott
Note: Mechanic is a free gateway between USENET & FIdonet.
      For information write to chief@mechanic.fidonet.org
From: schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: The New Bearcat 2500XLT-D (and 8500XLT-D)
Date: 11 Jan 93 14:32:19 GMT
Organization: Panix Public Access Internet & Unix, NYC

In article <1993Jan11.020732.7279%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu> mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu (Mike S.) writes:
>
>Does anyone know if these units can be modified to be
>continuous through the 800Mhz band?

Yes, I'm sure someone knows.
The engineers certainly do. 
Since they're the only people to have SEEN the scanners yet, you'd get
more information by picking up the phone and calling Uniden.



-- 
_______________________________Mike Schuster________________________________
NY Pub. Access UNIX/Internet: schuster@panix.com | 70346.1745@CompuServe.COM
The Portal (R) System: schuster@shell.portal.com | MCI Mail,GEnie: MSCHUSTER
From: IO91748@MAINE.MAINE.EDU (Jon Carr)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: FAQ and scanner modify doc. (which sites?)
Date: 11 Jan 93 15:04:10 GMT
Organization: University of Maine System

In article <1993Jan9.082306.7031@news2.cis.umn.edu>, cheangk@coral.micro.umn.edu
(Pitt) says:
>
>Is there a site or more than one site that carry the FAQ of this newsgroup

Ditto.

Also, if anyone has a list of 10-codes that they whould be kind enough to
post or e-mail to me, I would apreciate it.


    -----> Jon                                   Jon Carr
    -----> IO91748@MAINE.BITNET                  36 Forest Ave
    -----> IO91748@MAINE.MAINE.EDU               Orono, ME 04473
    How about those 21-0-1 Black Bears!!!  M-A-I-N-E GO BLUE!!!!
From: lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org (Mr. Lyn R. Kennedy)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: 800MHz Trunked Radio System Signals
Date: 6 Jan 93 08:30:35 GMT
Organization: Radio Amateur k5qwb

PLAWS@UAFSYSB.UARK.EDU writes:

> On 4 Jan 93 08:07:39 GMT you said:
> >puma@halcyon.com (puma) writes:
> >> why CAN'T the system immediately turn over the repeater channel
> >> to the emergency unit?  What difference would it make if the first
> >> remote unit continued transmitting?
> >
> >Say it's a five-channel system and all four talk channels are in use.
> 
> But if the site controller reassigns a repeater to the guy with the
> Ebutton pushed, and it "ruthlessly pre-empts" the lowest priority user,
> won't it just drop that radio, transmitting or not?

It could turn of the repeater but not the radio. It's still 
transmitting on the INPUT frequency for that repeater! It can block out 
another radio assigned to that repeater.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 
73,            internet     | lrk@k5qwb.lonestar.org
Lyn Kennedy    packet radio | K5QWB @ N5LDD.#NTX.TX.US.NA
               pony express | P.O. Box 5133, Ovilla, TX, USA 75154

-------------- "We have met the enemy and he is us."  Pogo --------------
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: kevin.jessup <kevin.jessup@mixcom.mixcom.com>
Subject: Re: Antenna Design
Organization: Milwaukee Internet Xchange BBS, Milwaukee, WI U.S.A.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 02:01:38 GMT

In <mjc-060193123941@micmac.mitre.org> mjc@iegate.mitre.org (Mick Costa) writes:

>I have heard in several places about the importance of a good antenna.  I
>currently own a PRO-37 and am thinking of "upgrading" to something like the
>AOR 1000.  Currently I have the standard rubber duck antenna, and
 ^^^^^^^^^
>extendable antenna, and a small roof antenna for use with the PRO-37. 
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I do not have an AOR1000 but I seem to remember someone saying that the
AOR1000, ICOM R1 and other "full coverage" handheld units have excessive
intermodulation problems with external antennas.  Can anyone confirm this?
 
-- 
Kevin Jessup, kevin.jessup@mixcom.mixcom.com

        "Friends don't let friends run DOS."
                          -- Microware
From: gregs@hotcity.COM (Greg Stramback)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Image rejection problems
Date: 10 Jan 93 01:13:40 PST
Organization: BBS

your scanner is just fine.  i have to deal with the same problems if i monitor
aircraft freqs as well.  the AM detector portion picking up the FM signals,
well that's normal as well.  one of my radios can transmit in either AM or FM
or SSB modes.  I tried monitoring it on my scanner to find that the scanner has
a hard time hearing an AM signal while it's set in FM mode, but can hear an FM
signal in AM mode quite well.  Guess it's just the way things work out.  I get
a few aircraft transmitters that blow over a few vital services down here on my
scanner, such as a nearby fire department, the CALCOORD freq., and a couple
other ones.  it's just the scanner that suffers the problem though, since i
know the actual radios in use by the agencies i listen to don't have such
remedial problems as the scanners do.  
greg
From: bob@olwejo.UUCP (Bob Kupiec)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Looking for a scanner w/ full coverage.
Keywords: scanner wanted full coverage 800 mhz
Date: 8 Jan 93 06:30:04 GMT
Reply-To: olwejo!bob%cs.widener.edu
Organization: Olwejo - Private UNIX System

In <1993Jan07.225422.18276%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu>, mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu writes:
>I plan on keeping this for a LONG time; it will be my first
>and only scanner.  I am looking for a handheld model with full
>coverage (including 800 Mhz).  Cost is some object, but I want
>a good, full-coverage, reliable one, even if it costs a bit more.

I have a Bearcat 200xlt and it works very good for most purposes and is
relatively inexpensive.  If I were you, I'd wait for a few weeks to get
the full scoop on the NEW Bearcat scanners.  Here is some preliminary info:

Uniden Bearcat's New Scanners
-----------------------------

2500-XLT
--------
Looks like the 100/200xlt
Handheld Portable
Continuous Coverage - 29MHz to 1,300MHz (less cellular) [unknown mods?]
400 Channels / 20 Banks
VFO Knob
Auto Frequency Store
20 Priority Channels
Reception Counter [what exactly is this?]
Turbo Scan [how fast?]
Step Select
(includes antenna, case, ni-cad pack, AC charger/adapter & earplug)
[unknown IF.  I really hope it's TRIPLE IF, not double!]

Price: $349 (CEI, Inc.)


8500-XLT
--------
Looks like the 760xlt
Base Unit
Continuous Coverage - 29MHz to 1,300MHz (less cellular)
*500* Channels / 20 Banks
VFO Knob
Auto Frequency Store
20 Priority Channels
Reception Counter
Turbo Scan
Step Select
*Alpha-numeric Display*
Aux. tape out jack
Selectable Delay

Price $369 (CEI, Inc.)

They sound great, I can't wait to get my hands on them!  Watch for
further announcements and reviews.

-- 
\/\  Bob Kupiec - Amateur Radio Packet: N3MML @ wb3ftp.#epa.pa.usa.noam  /\/\
/\/\  Internet: kupiec@hp800.lasalle.edu (or) bob%olwejo@cs.widener.edu /\/\/
\/\/\   Geographic: Morrisville, PA, USA     40d 12' N / 74d 48' W     /\/\/\
/\/\/\    Top 10 uses for your Intel CPU:  Number 10:  Test hammers   /\/\/\/
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: jennings@ssdt-tempe.sps.mot.com (Tim Jennings)
Subject: Re: Scanner sex?
Reply-To: jennings@ssdt-tempe.sps.mot.com
Organization: Motorola, Inc.
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 19:41:49 GMT

I missed the original post for "Scanner sex". Anybody
know where I can find it?
---
----------------------
Timothy J. Jennings 			"I Yam What I Yam."
Motorola SSDT Division			--Popeye
email: jennings@ssdt-tempe.sps.mot.com
From: sysrick@orion.spd.louisville.edu (Rick McTeague)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Radio Shack Service Manuals?
Date: 6 Jan 93 16:41:27 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In <VBREAULT.93Jan5102406@rinhp750.gmr.com> vbreault@rinhp750.gmr.com (Val Breault) writes:

>If you have trouble with a "Sales Associate" (clerk) then speak with
>the store manager.  If you have trouble with a store manager then
>speak with the district manager.... and so on.  You'll eventually 
>be speaking with someone that has a firm grasp of this fact:
>Radio Shack exists to SERVE the CUSTOMER.  Absent that, there is
>no niche for Radio Shack in the market place.  

My answer to posts complaining about problems with RS stores: hunt around, and find
a store (or person) you like. Give them your loyalty, and let them know they have it. 
They'll appreciate the compliment, and you'll probably find that they'll do a
few favors for you now and then.

In the store I worked in, we had people coming from a small town 25 minutes away
because the manager there was pain in the butt. You're going to find jerks
anywhere you go, whether it's a Radio Shack or a 7-11. Fortunately, there are
enough Radio Shacks around (at least where *I* live), that you can always find
a store that treats you right.

Rick
-- 

Rick McTeague
Electrical Engineering Department, Speed Scientific School
University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292
(502) 588-7020

Internet: sysrick@starbase.spd.louisville.edu

Disclaimer: I'm a stand-up comedian; if anyone takes me seriously, I'm
            doing something wrong!
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster)
Subject: Re: The New Bearcat 2500XLT-D (and 8500XLT-D)
Organization: Panix Public Access Internet & Unix, NYC
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 14:18:47 GMT

In article <C0q17r.K2y@olwejo.UUCP> olwejo!bob@cs.widener.edu writes:
>
>She also said that the 800MHZ cellular band is locked out in the CPU and
>*WILL NOT* be easily restored.

Hmm. It's not "easy" to restore cellular on the GRE/Realistic PRO-43,
but it's possible to do it you have the skill.

Makes one wonder what the scanner-bill sanctified working definition of
"easy" will be.



-- 
_______________________________Mike Schuster________________________________
NY Pub. Access UNIX/Internet: schuster@panix.com | 70346.1745@CompuServe.COM
The Portal (R) System: schuster@shell.portal.com | MCI Mail,GEnie: MSCHUSTER
Xref: sparky alt.radio.scanner:3619 misc.forsale:34729 rec.radio.swap:3431
From: ericd@cats.ucsc.edu (Eric D Davis)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner,misc.forsale,rec.radio.swap
Subject: Selling AOR 1000XLT
Date: 6 Jan 93 23:53:22 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu



I am considering selling my AOR 1000XLT.
  
I purchased it about a year ago and have never really used it.
The unit has been taken care of, never dropped, fully functional.
   
   500Khz to 1.3Ghz continous with NO holes
   1000 channels, 10 banks (with lock out on individual freq or entire bank)
   10 scan banks (with lock out on individual freq or entire bank)
   AM/FM/WFM
   Selectable freq steps
   Fast scan. ( do not know the rate. @ 30 freq second )
   Backlit LCD
   AA Nicads, that can be charged in the radio with supplied charger.
   Original duckie antenna
    
I think that I have the original packing.
     
ACE Communications is selling this unit for $450.
      
Since I am in a rush to sell, I am asking $400.
       
I will ship FedEx overnight for free..
	
Eric Davis
ericd@synoptics.com

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
In real life:    Eric Davis
On the internet: ericd@synoptics.com
On the air:      KD6HTO ( 440.85, +, 100Hz PL, North-Central CA )
On packet radio: KD6HTO @ N6IYA.#NOCAL.CA.US.NA
Home: LAT:37 03 04 N LON: 122 00 49 W ALT: 570
Cute musical quote "Invisible airwaves crackle with life...."
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: chinatti@burn.Princeton.EDU (Stephen Anthony Chinatti)
Subject: Re: BC950 vs BC750
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 06:19:59 GMT

In article <1irsq6INNlso@seven-up.East.Sun.COM> gduna@snafu.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (George Duna) writes:
>is the CTCSS, which leads me to my last question. Does anyone have
>first hand knowledge that you can mix tone entries,in both the 
>950 & 750, that is have one channel
>with tone and another with no tone (squelch only) and be able to 
>receive both. I have a BC600 with the CTCSS and it's either all tone
>or all squelch, anything scanned in the tone mode without a tone
>entered will not be received. 
>

George,
  I asked this same question to a Bearcat tech person who I called
because I have a BC950XLT which I was considering buying a CTCSS board
for.  However, there were a few channels which had either CS or DPL
receive that I wanted to monitor, so I wanted to be sure that I would
able to do both tone and no-tone.  The answer I got is that there are
two separate models out, one which can and one which can't.  The key
to determine which is which is the antenna connector on the back.  If
it is the older "Motorola" connector - like on a car FM radio - then
the scanner cannot do both.  If the connector is a BNC connector, then
the scanner can do both.  Unfortunately, mine was the old style, so I
didn't buy the board.  I'm not sure if the BNC type is BC760XLT only,
or BC950XLT also, but the connector seemed to be the key to it all.

	Hope this helps,
	Steve
-- 
Steve Chinatti, EMTA, EECS student, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
internet:chinatti@phoenix.Princeton.EDU     bitnet:chinatti@pucc.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
Subject: Re: Antenna Design
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:57:34 GMT

john@anasazi.com (John R. Moore) writes:
: 
: Yes... they have excessive intermod problems with too much signal. An
: external antenna may push them over the edge... it will increase the
: intermod.
: 
: Also, some (such as the PRO-2006 non-hand-held) will desense (ie,
: the front end overloads and loses its gain by tens of DB) with a strong
: signal. I have to use a Grove filter in front of my 2005 and 2006
: when on an external antenna. Without it, I measure desense in the
: 2 meter public service band of 36 - 38 dB!

You can also use a shorting stub. You would cut it to the resonant
frequeny of the interfering signal, which is usually a broadcast radio
or tv station. The only problem is figuring out how to attach it to    
the radio.  I am planning on doing some experimenting to see what I
can figure out.

Bill
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: scottb@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com (TheLrdLovsAHngn)
Subject: Re: Scanner sex?
Organization: United Technologies Research Center
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 19:36:39 GMT

Perhaps, I should dust off my scanner and go for a drive myself. :)
-- 
Disclaimer:  I didn't do it!  Nobody saw me do it!  You can't prove anything! 
             My opinions are my own.   They do not reflect anyone/thing else!
\/       preferred        \/
scottb%nw8550@utrcgw.utc.com            |           sdb@rcinet.utc.com
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com (John Schuch)
Subject: Re: Radio Shack Service Manuals?
Organization: Motorola Computer Group, Tempe, Az.
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 16:27:49 GMT

In article <1iak4jINN199@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> ba562@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (James R. Lytle) writes:
> 
>Could those of you who already have the service manuals for
>their Radio Shack scanners please post those catalog
>numbers? It would save those of us who would like these
>service manuals a lot of time and trouble.
> 

Scanner: PRO-2021    Service Manual: 20-113


John


-- 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| John R. Schuch  -  Motorola Computer Group  -  Manufacturing Engineering |
| N7XVS - schuch@phx.mcd.mot.com - (602) 438-3008 - CompuServe: 70733.3330 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: pas@jupitercmc.ca (Peter Stokes)
Subject: intermod, overload, desense?
Reply-To: pas@jupiter.ic.cmc.ca
Organization: not likely
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 19:54:15 GMT

I recently installed a Diamond D130 discone antenna
for a friend's Pro-2006 and Bearcat BC760XLT scanners.
After the installation was complete, we found reception
to be much poorer with the new discone and better with
the old metal whip antennas supplied with the scanners.
What's really interesting is that the reception IMPROVES
when the Pro-2006 10dB attenuator is enabled!

After some thought and reading (including the ARRL 
handbook),  I suspect the receiver front-ends are 
suffering from something called desensitization from 
a very strong signal from the nearby university broadcast
band FM radio station.    I have ordered the Grove
Scanner Filter and will try it when it arrives.   I am
hoping it will notch out the FM transmission and solve
the problem.    I presume that "desense" means the receiver
front end noise floor has effectively been raised to such 
a high level as to bury most other signals.   Is there 
any way to confirm this?   Has anyone experienced the same?
Comments are appreciated.    

Peter

Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: bbs.maddox@tsoft.net (Otto Maddox)
Subject: Fast Food Frequencies
Organization: The TSoft BBS and Public Access Unix, +1 415 969 8238
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 03:51:54 GMT

Anyone know some possible frequencies for the Jack in the Box and 
McDonald's around here? (Mountain View, Ca.)

Ah, just send me whatever you have and I'll check 'em out.

Otto Maddox 
[ bbs.maddox@tsoft.net ] [ maddox@west.darkside.com ]
From: urbina@novax.llnl.gov
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: Re: Police MCT Units
Date: 8 Jan 93 04:19:22 GMT

In article <gregs.2jvd@hotcity.COM>, gregs@hotcity.COM (Greg Stramback) writes:
> 
> i used to have the frequency, but i lost it (no reason to monitor when you
> don't have the equipment to decode it.  it's 800MHz)  anyway, i do know people
> (2) that do monitor it, through their own specialized equipment, but i have
> heard that it can be done using a Pakk-ratt pk232 node converter, though don't
> quote me on this, since it's only something i heard about...
> 
> greg




I wonder if the Mobile Display Terminal is an electroluminescent display, super
twist LCD display or regular CRT. If it is a regular CRT display, it may be
possible to pick up the screen RF via the Van Eck method. the drawback would be
that you would have to follow the patrol car as he/she goes about his or her
rounds. But then again knowing Motorola, they probably would have some sort of
TEMPEST standard or Faraday cage around the terminal.

Guy
Urbina@novax.llnl.gov

Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: chelf@lunatix.uucp (Chad Helfenberger)
Subject: Police codes
Organization: Lexington Public Access Unix. -KY- (606) 255-9121
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 06:31:27 GMT

Listening to the scanner tonight, a police officer regarded a
door as relatively 'P.O.E.'.  I assume he was talking about the
security of the door.  By the way, the particular officer and
dispatcher were talking about a keyholder, so I assumed that they
were going to a house of a person who was on vacation or
something.

Another thing.  The local news tonight was not allowed to give
any coverage on a 'disturbance' in a part of the city.
Interested, I turned on my scanner.  Almost every channel was
just a bunch of cops saying '113a', '265b', '0055', '0057', and
other stuff.  I assume they were using code words to prevent the
press from discovering what they were talking about.  Anyone know
what these mean, and if it's standard practice to lock out
scanner enthusiasts like this??  Thanks!

-- 
Chad Helfenberger
(chelf@lunatix.uucp) 
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
From: sbeatty@andy.bgsu.edu (Derek Smalls)
Subject: Re: BC950 vs BC750
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:59:16 GMT

gduna@snafu.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (George Duna) writes:
> I am thinking about buying either a BC950 or BC750 scanner, they
> both seem to be the same viewing the published specs I've seen.
> The one major difference is price:
> 
> Average BC950XLT  $250.00            Average BC750XLT $270.00
>            CTCSS    60.00                      CTCSS    60.00
>           PreAmp    24.99                     PreAmp    30.00
> 
> Does anyone know what if any the difference is that would warrant a
> $20 price difference ??
> 
> Grove's add for the 750XLT indicates an additional switch is needed
> for the CTCSS module and charges $10 for it, yet nowhere else I have
> seen this switch itemized as seperate, is this just a Grove rip off ?
> 
> The primary reason for purchasing one of these specific scanners
> is the CTCSS, which leads me to my last question. Does anyone have
> first hand knowledge that you can mix tone entries,in both the 
> 950 & 750, that is have one channel
> with tone and another with no tone (squelch only) and be able to 
> receive both. I have a BC600 with the CTCSS and it's either all tone
> or all squelch, anything scanned in the tone mode without a tone
> entered will not be received. 
> 
> thanks
> george
> 
> 
> 
George,

     The BC950xlt was made exclusively for sale by Scanner World only.  The only
difference between the two scanners that I am aware of is that the BC950xlt's
locked out cellular frequency ranges can be restored, whereas the BC760xlt's
cannot.

     Also, as far as I know, neither scanner will allow one to mix tone entries
with non-tone entries.

     Does anyone out there know anything about AIE's tone code accessories?


Sean G. Beatty
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Bowling Green State University
sbeatty@andy.bgsu.edu
From: wvogel@MtHolyoke.edu (keeper of the tone)
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner
Subject: mods needed
Date: 7 Jan 93 17:50:21 GMT
Organization: Mount Holyoke College
NNTP-Posting-Host: slab.mtholyoke.edu
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5


does any one know of any mods for the RS pro 42?
in particular to open up the 220 - 406 mhz freqs
From: efbasham@hp-ptp.ptp.hp.com (Everett Fred Basham)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 05:57:29 GMT
Subject: 860-900 MHz Band Pass Filters
Organization: HP Pacific Technology Park - Sunnyvale, Ca.