From: crj10@phx.cam.ac.uk (Clive Jones)
Subject: Re: You bunch of freaks
Followup-To: alt.flame 
Telephone-Messages: +44 223 33 4900
Address: Christ's College, Cambridge CB2 3BU, ENGLAND.
Organization: 6am Digital Playground
X-Furry-Character: Gerald_Duck
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 21:44:03 GMT

In article <rsvanc00.724101600@mik.uky.edu> rsvanc00@nx36.mik.uky.edu (Randolph S. Vance) writes:
>I got a THOROUGHLY HEARTWARMING response from Neil. Before, I thought I
>was dealing with a moron. Now I know he's an EXCEPTIONALLY LOW-GRADE moron! ;)

Yes, indeed. I am cross-posting this to alt.flame, where similar
discussions appear to be taking place already. With a little luck,
people there can keep sweet little Neil occupied. (-8

I'll add my comments to get the ball rolling...

>Here's his e-mail response in it's entirety:
>
>--- Begin transmission ---
>
>From: "Neil Rodgers" <Neil.Rodgers@newcastle.ac.uk>
>Message-Id: <AA07657.199212111416.ttyrc@newton.ncl.ac.uk>
>Subject: Re: You bunch of freaks
>To: rsvanc00@mik.uky.edu (randolph s vance)
>Date: Fri, 11 Dec 92 14:16:19 WET
>Cc: neil.rodgers@newcastle.ac.uk, ian.henderson@durham.ac.uk
>In-Reply-To: <9212110039.AA16752@mik.uky.edu>; from "randolph s vance" at Dec 10
>, 92 7:36 pm
>X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
>Status: R
> 
>Limey Bastards Eh? Shut your festering gob you tit. Your type realy make me
>puke with your fake lives and your fake politics, you think were Royalists, we
>think your arseholes. What have you ever gave us? Mcdonalds, big fucking deal.

Strange that Neil should choose to quote one of the first out
homosexuals in international showbusiness... (Graham Chapman,
Monty Python). (-8

For the record, I'm British, and like McDonalds. Judging from Neil's
last mail message to me, he seems to think I'm American - which is an
intriguingly gormless deduction to make from my e-mail address.

>And as for your reference for my structuring and execution of the art of the
>Queens English your reference to "Limeys" isn't in the English Dictionary and
>you my foreign friend could not find your arse with an atlas.

I look at Neil's own English. Am I impressed - you bet I'm not. Which
Engilsh dictionary isn't "Limey" in? There are many variants on the
language, and Queen's English is only one.

>        Don`t criticise the Royal Family, just take a look at your `first
>family`, George "I`m not a totally crooked ex C.I.A Cheif, and I won`t raise
>taxes too" Bush. And anyway what made you boiling pot of people you call an
>electorate elect him in the first place. The ex-chief of the C.I.A isn`t the
>sort of person you would look up to as a role model and an example of family
>life, and Barbara Bush isn`t exactly Princess Diana is she.

<Beep> Sweeping generalisation. Anyway, what made us boiling pot of
people elect Maggie, or John Major? Princess Diana isn't exactly a
member of the royal family any more, if public opinion is to be
accepted. (80% of the population surveyed said she should not be
crowned Queen.)

>        And when your not at the `Ball Game` watching a bunch of blokes run
>after each other wearing womens make-up and body armour in case they damage
>thier plastic surgery and getting fat on popcorn and hot dogs, your poncing
>around at some political meeting playing with balloons and Clinton tatooed on
>your foreheads looking like a bunch of dimented puppets. And Clinton can`t even
>smoke a joint " I didn`t inhale" what a pack of, using a sad American term
>`jerks`.
>        And anyway why don`t you go and shag another bent bastard whilst
>wearing womens clothes. Us Brits are real men and proud of it we don`t wear
>womens clothes because we are not fucked up in the head like you American arse
>bandits.

There are arse bandits in the UK too, you know. Lots of us. All over
the place. We're coming to get yoooooou...
 
>--- End transmission ---
>
>Well, I have two responses to this. One, I did not call him a limey bastard,
>I called him a Limey, stuck-up, Royal turd. Big difference between the two.

Well, er... good for you.

>Two, I never said I was a transvestite, nor did I state my sexual preference.

Neither did I, but I'm still engaged in a mail exchange with this
pillock. I certainly never said I was American, nor did I state my
sexual preference, and I specifically mentioned that I was *not*
transvestite, although I hope I have adequately conveyed that I
heartily endorse the right of people to be if they feel so inclined.
Neil seems convinced however that I'm an American, gay transvestite.

>What people do in their private lives is of no one elses concern, especially
>to someone with his prioritys so far out of whack like Neil Rodgers. People
>like Neil symbolize the ignorant single-minded individual out to cram
>religion or repression down others throats. All Neil needs is a Gestapo
>uniform and a swastika and a passport to 1938 Germany.

Well said.

>AND another little note about Neil's cute remarks about King George and
>Queen Barbara. At least they're not DIVORCED like (Up)Chuck and Die are. ;)

Point of information: Charles and Di are only _separated_.

>THAT is MY two cents worth.

This is MY two pence worth. (-8

--Clive.
Newsgroups: alt.transgendered