HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sbl2@ellis.uchicago.edu (S.B. Lawsky)
Subject: Re: Regrets
Reply-To: sbl2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 22:33:30 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.220009.18651@u.washington.edu> skaven@milton.u.washington.edu (William Gilliland) writes:
>In article <7iDZiB3w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>>kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star) writes:
>
>>> So, how long have you been a misogynist? As long as you've been a
>>> homophobe?
>>
>>No. MUCH longer. BTW: 'homophope' is nothing but a 'horror-word'
>>intended to incite loathing and such in a person in hope of
>>manipulating him/her/it into conforming to your point of view.
>>It also is not in any listing of medical terms or dictionary!!!
>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Wrong. On page 916 of the 2nd edition of the unabridged Random House
dictionary, there are these entries:

_homophobe_: n, a person who fears or hates homosexuals and
homosexuality.

_homophobia_: n, unreasoning fear of or antipathy towards homosexuals
and homosexuality

Nice try, though. 
-- 
theaccusedcarnyfreakyfridaysiestathesilenceofthelambstaxidriverstealinghome
S. B. Lawsky                                         sbl2@midway.uchicago.edu
backtracksvengalishadowsandfogfivecornersfoxeshotelnewhampshirelittlemantate
  
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6783 alt.politics.homosexuality:2120
From: asahi@druid.csc.ncsu.edu (B.P. Asahi)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: FAG, DYKE, AND QUEER ARE ALL IN MY DICTIONARY
Date: 14 Apr 92 18:11:13 GMT
Reply-To: asahi@druid.csc.ncsu.edu (B.P. Asahi)
Distribution: na
Organization: Space Cadet Club



The word "homophobia" is in the dictionary? So are the words fag, dyke
and queer!! Homophobia is an irrational fear of homos, I have a rational 
loathing of homos and their disgusting practices.
From: efudd@GeoWare.COM (Elmer Fudd)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 22:26:07 EDT
Organization: GeoWare Software Design, Toronto ON

djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

> Never see any (or very many) caps in my posts. :)

...or any intelligence to speak of, fuckwit.  Blow it out your ass,
motorcycle man!

Fudd.

   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy" |
   |            Elmer Fudd         -> efudd@GeoWare.COM <-             |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: flamestats@rotag.mi.org (Alt.flame Statistician)
Subject: Re: Jeff Dauber Speaks for the Militants
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 92 17:52:06 GMT

In article <ktplg6INNnqj@male.EBay.Sun.COM> peewee@playhouse.EBay.Sun.COM (Philip H. Stromer) writes:
>
>	Mitch writes:
>		>Ronnie Jr.
>		>"There is nothing more disgusting than a man with a
>		>dick in his mouth."
>
>	Except, maybe, a man with shit for brains.
>	Mitch
>
>Sorry Mitch, but a man with shit for brains is not as gross as a
>man with shit on his dick.  But rootslurpers are  obviously BOTH.
>
>I'm proud to be #3 in a couple of alt.flame categories.  I feel as
>if my 15 minutes that Andy Warhol promised me have come true).
>Thanx, StatMan!

Your welcome.  Your best categories were ``Diversity'' & ``Average 
Response''.  Both #3.  Actually you were in a dead heat with Ronnie 
Jr. in the ``Diversity'' category.  But because your login-id started 
with a p for peewee it collated above ronniejr.  My software doesn't 
recognise third equal yet :(

>I'd sure hate to be the #1 asshole in the DUD category.  Gimme a
>fucking break.  300 posts and nobody even bothers to answer his
>sorry pimply ass.  Sounds like NAMBLA material to me...

Actually Mr. Royce posted 114 articles and only 39 of them were 
responded-to.  That's a hit-ratio of 34.5%.  Which is still a
better hit-ratio then other ubiquitous posters like Barry Schwartz, 
John F. Woods & Chris Colby.

			*** KEEP POSTING, DUDES ****
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6624 alt.politics.homosexuality:2032 alt.sex:14262
From: entropy@wpi.WPI.EDU (Lawrence C Foard)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 12 Apr 92 22:55:03 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute

In article <5qe6iB5w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>Why? - That would make it too easy. 
>
>Thats what is being counted on.

Your welcome to keep posting 100's of posts but quantity has never made
up for quality. Of course you will probably just end up in people's
kill files...

Atleast you have the guts to post under your real account, unlike ronniejr,
ralf winston and artimus.
-- 
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are 99.44% true.            ------  0<p<1  
Hackers do it for fun.  |  Being Bisexual squares your         \    / therefore
"Profesionals" do it for money. |  probability of not getting   \  / p^2<p and
Managers have others do it for them. |  laid on a saturday night.\/ 1-p^2>1-p 
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: aap@wam.umd.edu (Alberto Adolfo Pinkas)
Subject: Re: Regrets
Organization: University of Maryland at College Park
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 17:16:43 GMT

In article <jlmmb1s@fido.asd.sgi.com> dauber@sgi.com (Jeff Dauber) writes:
>In article <wi8DJB7w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>>pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?)) writes:
>>
>>> no.  alcoholism is a disease.  homosexuality is not.  
>>> peg
>>
>>I think it is.. Has all of the overtones....
>
>
>Give a written explanation as to why you think homosexuality is a disease.
>Don't fall back on words like "disgusting" or "wrong" because they are not
>scientific terms.  Do not invoke the bible, because this is not an
>anthropological discussion.
>
>
>Here we go... Convince me that I am diseased... Try it...  I'll listen to
>your arguments...
>
>
>
>
>FWA

This is a loop.
Now he might say that you should show him that homosexuality is not a
disease, and that you should convince him.
So? What is the point in all of this?

AAP
From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION...
Date: 10 Apr 92 22:11:29 GMT
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon

In article <83758@bu.edu> kane@buast7.bu.edu (Hot Young Star) writes:
#In article <1992Apr8.113711.696@gacvx2.gac.edu>
#homohater karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick) writes:
#
##Well for [straight men sucking a cock is] gross and disgusting!
##Fortunately, for normal heterosexual people, it doesn't take "practice"
##to get keep from gagging when we copulate. There must be something wrong
##with homosexuality if one has condition one's self to it.  
#
#Gee, Karstain, does your girlfriend/wife have a naturally expandable
#throat? What, no gag reflex either? Gee, there must be something wrong
#with heterosexual oral sex if one has to condition oneself to it.

From all reports, his "girlfriend" is inflatable.  I have no
doubt that the rubber will stretch.

##We have a hard time with your disgusting habits.  Do what you
##want, but don't expect our approval if you brag about it.
#
#Mind telling all of us just what those habits are, dear?

I want to know who the "we" is that he refers to.  


Susan
TSAKC
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: klm@gozer.mv.com (Kevin L. McBride)
Subject: Re: I'm not your man...
Organization: GhostBuster Central - Southern NH Usenet Access, Nashua, NH
Distribution: world,public
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 92 03:53:27 GMT

mathew@mantis.co.uk (From A to B) writes:

> "Sun Microsystems".  "Philip H Stroker".  I can almost hear the mental links
> being forged.

Hmmm.  Ya know, I already had a pretty low opinion of my Sparc IPC to
begin with.  Knowing that idiots like Phil Stromer are making them
doesn't help my perceptions of Sun as a serious computer company.

I think my next workstation will be an HP or a DEC.
From: karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Lawrence Foard Attempts TO Justify "Queer Nation"
Date: 7 Apr 92 15:29:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr7.092934.668

In article <1992Apr4.093948.12197@wpi.WPI.EDU>  writes:

}Disclaimer: Opinions are based on logic rather than biblical "fact".  ------
}This is a mutated signature virus, if you don't put it in your .sig   \    /
}file you may lose your job, your dog may be run over, and you may die. \  /
}If you repent and add the .sig you may win the lottery and get laid.    \/ 

Too bad the disclaimer isn't based on fact.  Maybe we can fix that.
Here's how it should read:

Disclaimer:  Opinions are based on homosexuality and queerness.  ------
This is bear code, and if you are gay and don't put it in your   \    /
sig, your state of homosexuality may not be acknowledged on this \  /
newsgroup.  You won't have lots of e-mail sex and the support of   \/
all the wonderful fags on alt.flame.  You might not meet cool queers
at gay bars or be successful at picking up boys.  If you convert and
add this to your .sig you may get laid and catch AIDS.

Karsten Hendrick
karsten@nic.gac.edu
karsten@lavatch.gac.edu
 
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: elf@polari.com
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Organization: Seattle Online Public Access Unix
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 21:57:58 GMT

In article <N3myiB5w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

>And there is more to disliking something then 'bigotry'...
>Gee.. You forgot to say  'racist' too.

   No, didn't.  You haven't demonstrated that you are a racist.
Alt.politics.homosexuality is _our_ court, Danny-boy, and anything you
have said will be used against you.  We don't need to make up
accusations.  You're self-damning as it is.

      Elf !!
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6823 alt.politics.homosexuality:2149
Organization: The American University - University Computing Center
Date: Tuesday, 14 Apr 1992 21:10:52 EDT
From: Herschel Browne <HERSCH@auvm.american.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: FAG, DYKE, AND QUEER ARE ALL IN MY DICTIONARY
Distribution: na

In article <1992Apr14.3211.9877@druid.csc.ncsu.edu>, asahi@druid.csc.ncsu.edu
(B.P. Asahi) says:
>
>The word "homophobia" is in the dictionary? So are the words fag, dyke
>and queer!! Homophobia is an irrational fear of homos, I have a rational
>loathing of homos and their disgusting practices.

Thanks for sharing.

H.

Xref: sparky alt.flame:6911 alt.fan.q:421
From: jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca (John Henders)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.fan.q
Organization:  One of these days.
Subject: Re: Kevin's "Business" Practices
	<0u6Hp*&e6@cs.psu.edu> <22980@goofy.Apple.COM>
Reply-To: jhenders@jonh.wimsey.bc.ca
X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.00 Rev. Jan 16 1992
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 09:38:26 -0600

In <jc8Hzp?q6@cs.psu.edu>, Kenneth J Robinson writes:
>In article <22980@goofy.Apple.COM> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
>>In article <0u6Hp*&e6@cs.psu.edu>, krobinsn@carn-dum.endor.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J
>>Robinson) writes:
>>> 
>>> Can we say MISINFORMED, boys and girls?
>>
>>The evidence would strongly suggest that that's all you _can_ say.
>
>Can we say IDIOT-AT-LARGE, boys and girls?
>
>K e n   R o b i n s o n

    Quite frequently when referring to you.


-- 
There are a lot of intelligent people on the net that will go
ballistic when they are subjected to something stupid.
-- Larry Smith on the rec.arts.manga debate
From: aabenson@pace4.cts.mtu.edu (Drew Benson)
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Organization: Columbia University Center for Telecommunications Research
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 03:21:27 GMT

Damn you!
Xref: sparky alt.flame:7156 alt.politics.homosexuality:2409 alt.sex:15022
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 17 Apr 92 07:02:50 GMT
Article-I.D.: Bogus.FF6cJB11w164w
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:

> Ever see 'the boss' talk about something and then watch all of 
> the little yes-men start nodding their heads and saying "oh yes!
> that is brilliant!!" or just generally verbally groveling for
> attention? - Same basic thing.. 
> 
> -djk

Hehe...  I did that at my old job.  I had called a department meeting, and
then started to suggest the ridiculous.  Just as my wife said, about 3/4's
of them thought that it was a good idea to give away free services every
odd tuesday to people shorter than 5'7"...  Amazing...  A bunch of damned
followers.  Some one could lead them all into jumping off a cliff.  Maybe I
should have suggested that.  Would have had to hire some new yuppies though.

HaaHaa....  Ohwell.

As a rule of thumb, I have seen that about 90% of the population are blind
followers, incapable of free thought.

:-(



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: OGGLEs Are FUCKING LAME!
From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 00:01:46 GMT
Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Keywords: When Jake played with himself he was rejected

In article <19dHu9_p6@cs.psu.edu> Jacob A. Vanier <vanier@cs.psu.edu> writes:
>In article <9204120857.40@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>
>>And you're ken's halfwit brother?
>>
>>Why don't you go help him with his toilet worship?
>>
>
>No, I am not K e n's brother, nor do I have any famillal relationship with
>K e n. 

But you are a halfwit.

>I do not worship toilets, therefore how could I be of any help to a person
>who does worship toilets?  Also, since when has Ken ever asked for help with
>worshiping toilets?  Never as far as I know.

Good point.

>That aside, why should you care wether K e n needs help worshiping toilets?
>Is it some special fascination or even fetish that you have with toilets?  Or
>do you think that since you do it, then everyone else also worships toilets?

He spends a lot of time talking about toilets.

>You can spare us the gory details of your religious beleifs, but do not assume
>that others practice their faith the same way you do.

Explain that to "K e n".  He's the guy who's into porcelain.

-- 

Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.UUCP	unixland!rmkhome!rmk	rmk@frog.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Re: kebbie squeals like a stuck pig when he is exposed in another lie (was Re: Keegan Stoops to Attempted Fraud)
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 01:44:26 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.220909.6562@crd.ge.com> james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
>kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>-> james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
>
>-> >you are a fucking liar.
>
>-> What a comforting thought it 
>
>you find it comforting 

Isn't that what I just said?

(Gee, these editing games are fun, aren't they, Jimmy?)

							- Kevin
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6654 alt.politics.homosexuality:2045 alt.sex:14286
From: bob@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU (robert s. richardson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 13 Apr 92 03:15:37 GMT
Organization: CS Dept. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

In article <q2e6iB7w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
>skaven@milton.u.washington.edu (William Gilliland) writes:
>> George Weinberg introduced the term homophobia in _Society and the Healthy
>> Homosexual_ (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1972).
>
>Isn't that like saying 'society and the healthy alcoholic?'..
>-djk

No, It's not.

Alcoholism contributes to the destruction of the individual.  Homosexuality
does not.  I am in no way physically disadvantaged by being gay.  I can
have children if I want, and being gay won't kill me.  I'm sure at this
point you will bring up AIDS as a counter-arguement.  This is not logically
valid because being a homosexual does not imply engaging in unsafe
activity.   My sexual encounters can in no way be described as unsafe, and
do not contribute to the spreading of disease.  If you don't know how
I manage that, then you need to use your imagination.

.ob.flame
If you still can't figure it out, I'd be happy to show you.  I'll bring
the rope.
.ob.flame.off

| Bob Richardson     (or, for you UNIX buffs: bob@jacobs.cs.orst.edu) |
| 218 NW 21st #2           Corvallis, OR  97330          503-758-5018 |
| __            						      |
| \/   WI- GR+ F++ ST* GL- SC++ MU& WH WE& SF+ YA++ SN- NU-- SW- SR+  |
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6851 alt.politics.homosexuality:2171
From: punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: GAY & LESBIAN DISCRIMINATION IS FUCKING HILARIOUS
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 04:55:15 CDT
Organization: Bogus.COM -- Public Access Network Services

rhiann@milton.u.washington.edu (Sandra Hereld) writes:

> I am with Tim Pierce however, I think that sex depictions - hetero, queer -
> are NOT a bad thing.

Not bad.  But keep in mind, if we raise a society that just goes and fucks
the neighbors, the milk man, and the wierdo down the street, that will
dramatically increase the spread of aids, and other diseases.

I suggest that we cure those first, and then worry about how open we are with
sex.  The entire fate of the human race depends on it.



===
* punk@Bogus.COM (Jack C. Royce) * via CyberSpace Cafe
My opinions are my own.  They may or may not be shared by the management.
Xref: sparky alt.flame:6986 alt.politics.homosexuality:2271 alt.sex:14866
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.sex
Subject: Re: Regrets
Date: 16 Apr 92 19:59:31 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <k5e6iB8w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM>, djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
> 
> Scoolyard politics always make me snicker.

No doubt you'll feel differently once you make it into third grade.

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
From: karsten@nic.gac.edu (Karsten Hendrick)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: k a r s t e n   thinks Keegan c o w e r s about his sexuality
Date: 13 Apr 92 18:47:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: gacvx2.1992Apr13.124756.840

In article <1992Apr12.034034.9329@crd.ge.com>  writes:

> -> > ->  [whine whine whine...gaybashing]
 
> -> I'll "bash" anyone I want, and it doesn't have much to do with
> -> their sexual orientation.
 
> sure sonny, backpedal all you want. smirk.

Uh-uh, Keegan.  You have to prove that I am backpedaling, before
you just say that.  
 
> -> > -> That includes you, whether or not you happen to be homosexual
> -> > -> or heterosexual or asexual.
  
> -> > make up your mind. don't be afraid.
 
> -> Uh, gee, Keegan, that statement above, translates into:
 
> you don't need to translate what i write sonny. if you have
> trouble with what said, deal with that: not with what you say i
> said.

Sometimes you are so dense, Keegan.  Get a clue.
I was translating MY statement for your benefit, Keegan.  The one
that says "That includes you, whether or not... "  Take it as a
compliment that I believe you to be competent enough to understand
what YOU write.

> -> > -> I find homosexual behaviour disgusting.  
  
> -> > based on what, dearie, just a few unsatisfying experiences?
 
> -> No, the thought of it disgusts me.  
 
> what kind of thoughts are you having, hmmmm?

That you're an idiot, for one.  Who made you the thought
cop, Keegan?  I can think what I want, and I don't have
to like homosexuality.  
 
> -> > -> Are you so insecure about your homosexuality
 
> -> > are you admitting to firsthand experience here, sonny?
 
> -> No, this is what I am admitting, Keegan: I could care less if
> -> all the newspapers in the world headlined "Karsten Hendrick is
> -> Heterosexual."  I am who I am and I am proud of what I am.  If
> -> some people don't like me, or the fact that I am heterosexual,
> -> that's their problem.

> -> So what are you Keegan?  
 
> no doubt something that invades your troubled thoughts, sonny.

Chickenshit.  Weak.  Coward.  My thoughts on this matter are
quite clear.  Yours must be all muddled if you can't answer 
my simple question.

Karsten Hendrick
karsten@nic.gac.edu
karsten@lavatch.gac.edu
From: olias@sunhillo.uucp (Mitch Gorman)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Declaration of War on PSU
Date: 16 Apr 92 15:35:47 GMT
Organization: Digital Systems Corp., Cherry Hill, NJ

In article <1992Apr15.130051.1347@wkuvx1.bitnet> kinnema@wkuvx1.bitnet (Mark Kinney, Attorney at Chaos) babbles:
>In article <sq2wH7=wq6@atlantis.psu.edu>, bufalini@near.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
>> 
>> Show me one post of mine where I typed "OGGLE."  You appear to be lying.

	Now shut the fuck up and die.
-- 
Mitch						"If I had my way, I'd just walk
olias@sunhillo.uucp				through those doors, and wander
emrys@cellar.org				down the Champs d'Elysees..."
cellar!emrys@tredysvr.tredydev.unisys.com	- Joni Mitchell (no relation)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: bufalini@beyond.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Subject: Re: This newsgroup has gone to hell!
Keywords: "Rick thinks" == oxymoron.
Reply-To: bufalini@beyond.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini)
Organization: PENN$YLVANIA $TATE UNIVER$ITY
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 17:50:47 GMT

In article <9204132058.14@rmkhome.UUCP>, rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
|> In article <ov0wH&4jp6@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
|> >In article <9204120838.24@rmkhome.UUCP>, rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
|> >|> In article <x3$vHhd8m6@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@above.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
|> >|> >In article <9204081556.29@rmkhome.UUCP>, rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
|> >|> >|> In article <1=+vH+5qk6@atlantis.psu.edu> bufalini@beyond.gis.psu.edu (Bruce Bufalini) writes:
|> >|> >|> >In article <9204071438.26@rmkhome.UUCP>, rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
|> >|> >|> 
|> >|> >|> >|> >Yeah, and I'll send you a map to come to Penn State, the center of all
|> >|> >|> >|> >information.
|> >|> >|> >|> 
|> >|> >|> >|> It seems more like the center of bewilderment, to me.
|> >|> >|> >
|> >|> >|> >And it seems that your brain and your life are the center of misinformation.
|> >|> >|> 
|> >|> >|> Wrong again.  I haven't given my hard-earned money to PSU.
|> >|> >
|> >|> >And since you haven't, you will never be informed of anything.
|> >|> 
|> >|> I think you've got that backwards.
|> >
|> >Another lame response from someone whose brain is going backwards.  Better
|> >take it in for immediate repairs.
|> 
|> 
|> You're too late.  Ken, who seems to think that you aren't articulate
|> enough to followup a news article, has already answered for you.

No, K e n  has not spoken for me.  You are again misinformed.  I can
articulate enough to follow up; that's what I'm doing now.

|> And he screwed it up again.

No, you are the one who screwed up by saying I had it backwards.  Your brain
appears to comparable to that of a two-year-old.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
Subject: Giving Jimmy a Chance for Redemption (was Re: The Kevster Wishes More Legal Advice)
Organization: Who, me???
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 92 18:10:43 GMT

In article <1992Apr3.221351.13204@crd.ge.com> keegan@rosebud.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr) writes:
>sea-wolf@deathstar.com (Sea Wolf) writes:
>>Hint: Q is a habitual liar.  
>
>i've seen no evidence of this. and you've offered none. darcy,
>on the other hand, shown himself to be a liar quite frequently.

Please identify the *MOST* provable of all my alleged "lies". I know you have
reasonable archives, so this should be simple for you. And certainly if even 
the _most_ provable alleged "lie" is a sham, all of the less provable ones 
must be even bigger shams, right?

Come on, Jimmy, here's your chance to redeem yourself after the embarrassing
test-case affair. 

Remember what you said:

"btw, i did not support my statement [...] in this post. why don't you 
 ask that i do so. i'll be pleased to comply with that request. anyone 
 who wouldn't is a liar, or coward, or both. don't you agree?"
						<9crrdha@rpi.edu>

I'm asking that you support your statement that I have "shown [myself] to
be a liar". Are you a "liar, or coward, or both", Jimmy???

								- Kevin