HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: zbig@wariat.org (Zbigniew J. Tyrlik)
Subject: Re: Announcing UniBoard 1.10, a BBS package for Unix on 80x86 boxes
Followup-To: alt.bbs
Reply-To: zbig@wariat.org (Zbigniew J. Tyrlik)
Organization: Akademia Pana Kleksa, Public Access Uni* Site
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 01:45:46 GMT

As quoted from <1992Sep28.213248.724@socrates.umd.edu> by collins@socrates.umd.edu (Jim C):

+---------------
> Can you describe <exactly> how to get it using UUCP?
> Mail to you bounces, so I had to post, sorry :-(.
> Jim C.

1) For true UNIX fans: 
make an entry into your Systems file:
wariat Any ACU 115200	1-2164819445 "" \r\c lik \c  gin: nuucp
wariat Any ACU 115200	1-2164819425 "" \r\c lik \c  gin: nuucp

Well, use your _preferred_ speed of course :-);  9445 is USR DS,
9425 is served by Telebit WB (I have seen transfer rates above
1950cps on compressed files).


Then request following files: 

/x/files/uniboard/UNIB110A.tar.Z
/x/files/uniboard/UNIB110B.tar.Z
/x/files/uniboard/UNIB110C.tar.Z
/x/files/ls-lR.Z

2) for lazy UNIX fans:

use your preferred package - XC, ECU, PCOMM, ( DOS will not work -
names are not in dos format...)

Dial one of above numbers; login as bbs, download files from
filearea 1.


You can send me e-mail if you suceed. 

Also, if you want me to send you files on floppy in dos format,
send mailer, floppy, and a bank-note to motivate me to this effort.

> collins@socrates.umd.edu
> 
> -- 
>         "By practice, even without understanding, it will be made plain; your
> body will understand it long before your mind puts words to it. No amount of
> understanding without practice will work. It is not necessary that knowledge 
> precede experience. Performance will produce knowledge."


Well, I would recommend getting a mail feed from me - my mail to
Rick goes in no problem in couple hours.... 


_zjt
-- 
********************************************************************
Zbigniew J. Tyrlik             wariat!zbig           zbig@wariat.org
IBM PC SIG Sysop - Cleveland Free-Net    aa609@cleveland.freenet.edu
Akademia Pana Kleksa   Public Access UNI* Cleveland,  (216)-481-9445
E-mail, news feeds, shell accounts        UnixBBS distribution point 
********************************************************************
Xref: sparky alt.bbs:6298 alt.bbs.unixbbs:111
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,alt.bbs.unixbbs
Subject: Info on Commercial BBS systems wanted
From: kilroy@acme.gen.nz (earthbound misfit, I)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 11:47:15 GMT
Followup-To: alt.bbs.unixbbs
Organization: ACME BBS - Public Access Usenet, Palmerston North, New Zealand

I'm looking for info on commercial BBS systems available for running under
Unix. I've already got some info about Uniboard, but I understand there's a
few other good systems around. If anybody has any information or a contact
address I'd be very greatful.

							- k
-- 
Craig Harding            kilroy@acme.gen.nz             ACME BBS +64 6 3551342
"Jub'f Xvob?"
From: gridlock@cats.ucsc.edu (Will Gridweed)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: ANSI graphical editor.
Date: 27 Sep 1992 16:11:14 GMT
Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz
Distribution: world,local
NNTP-Posting-Host: am.ucsc.edu
Keywords: ANSI


w71514835@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (John Leo Woodburn) writes:

>Hello,
>   I am in the beginning stages of setting up a new BBS.  To help make my
>board a little more graphically appealing, I was wondering if there is a
>ANSI graphical text editor available.  I would prefer something that is 
>available via FTP, but any suggestions would be helpful.
>   I am running my bulletin board on a Macintosh, and would prefer a mac
>app, but DOS or windows would also be helpful.

	TheDraw is by far the most popular ansi editor for dos. It is currently 
in version 4.51. Filename should be tdraw451.xxx I always found it on local
bbs's, so sorry I don't have an ftp for you...
hope this helps
-Will

-- 
gridlock@cats.ucsc.edu
"Evil Pays"
From: cuadrasola@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.unixbbs
Subject: PBBS problem
Date: 6 Oct 92 19:19:46 CDT
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

I have a problem running PBBS (Pirate BBS).  I am running it on a SUN
workstation under Unix SVR4.  The problem is that when I try to create a board
it and I type a name, it tells me "error: wrong board name" and it prompts
again for the board name.  Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
In any case,  can someone recomend other BBS programs to run on a SUN
workstation under Unix SVR4? 

-- 
Juan 

+--------------------------------------+
|                                      |
| Juan P. Cuadra-Sola                  |
| cuadrasola@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu        |
| Electrical and Computer Engineering  |
| University of Kansas                 |
| Lawrence, KS. 66045                  |
|                                      |
+--------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.unixbbs,alt.bbs.unixbbs.uniboard
From: adam@cs.curtin.edu.au (Adam Sawyer)
Subject: Uniboard for 386BSD or Linux?
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 08:13:06 GMT


Hiya guyz!

Could we possibly have a port of Uniboard to the 386BSD environment or
better still, Linux?

I've already tried to run the executables on these environments, and both
fail dismally...

I've got SCO Unix 3.2.4 here also, but without the development system its 
a little hard to compile NetNews...


adam.

Newsgroups: alt.bbs.unixbbs.uniboard,alt.bbs.unixbbs,alt.bbs
From: zbig@wariat.org (Zbigniew J. Tyrlik)
Subject: bbsmaild202 available from wariat
Organization: Akademia Pana Kleksa, Public Access Uni* Site
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 12:54:00 GMT




Nev version of bbsmaild - signed as bbsmaild202 is available 
for nuucp from wariat.org. Also, distribution file UNIB110B.tar.Z 
has been updated with new maildaemon. 

How to retrieve it: 

1) phones: 
216-481-9445	USR DS
216-481-9425	Telebit WB
216-481-9436    2400 dialers... 

2) login nuucp; files are located in 
/x/files/uniboard
as:
bbsmaild202.Z

or full distribution:
UNIB110A.tar.Z
UNIB110B.tar.Z
UNIB110C.tar.Z


3) login bbs, register and download distribution from filearea 1. 
You can do it during one call if you know how to use wildcards and
batching protocols :-).


_zjt
-- 
********************************************************************
Zbigniew J. Tyrlik             wariat!zbig           zbig@wariat.org
IBM PC SIG Sysop - Cleveland Free-Net    aa609@cleveland.freenet.edu
Akademia Pana Kleksa   Public Access UNI* Cleveland,  (216)-481-9445
E-mail, news feeds, shell accounts        UnixBBS distribution point 
********************************************************************
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.unixbbs
From: pizzi@nervous.com (Riccardo Pizzi)
Subject: Re: Uniboard up for FTP PLEASE!?!?!
Reply-To: pizzi@nervous.com (Riccardo Pizzi) 
Organization: The Nervous XTC Public Access Unix System, Rimini, ITALY
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 02:03:14 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.112154.23845@wariat.org> zbig@wariat.org (Zbigniew J. Tyrlik) writes:

>With pleasure, but can someone volunteer with a site willing to
>keep binaries available through anonymous FTP ??

I used to archive them on nic.funet.fi, but all the pieces of uuencoded mail
I sent to the person who administer it bounced back with an unknown mailer
error!! I am trying to get in touch with the administrator, I'll let you
know.

Rick
-- 
Riccardo Pizzi @ the Nervous XTC Public Access Unix System, Rimini, ITALY
E-Mail -> pizzi@nervous.com        <*>      Bang-path -> uunet!nervous!pizzi
Nervous XTC, the home of the UniBoard package * Data: +39-541-27135 HST/PEP/V32
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.unixbbs
From: zbig@wariat.org (Zbigniew J. Tyrlik)
Subject: Re: Uniboard up for FTP PLEASE!?!?!
Followup-To: alt.bbs.unixbbs
Reply-To: zbig@wariat.org (Zbigniew J. Tyrlik)
Organization: Akademia Pana Kleksa, Public Access Uni* Site
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 11:21:54 GMT

As quoted from <adam.717660269@marsh> by adam@cs.curtin.edu.au (Adam Sawyer):

+---------------
> 
> Hiya gyuz...
> 
> 
> Would someone PLEASE put up Uniboard for FTP?  I live in Australia
> and hus its a little expensive to ring the US...
> 
> 
> 

With pleasure, but can someone volunteer with a site willing to
keep binaries available through anonymous FTP ??

_zjt
-- 
********************************************************************
Zbigniew J. Tyrlik             wariat!zbig           zbig@wariat.org
IBM PC SIG Sysop - Cleveland Free-Net    aa609@cleveland.freenet.edu
Akademia Pana Kleksa   Public Access UNI* Cleveland,  (216)-481-9445
E-mail, news feeds, shell accounts        UnixBBS distribution point 
********************************************************************
From: miket@frog.CRDS.COM (vulture)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.unixbbs
Subject: Re: Info on Commercial BBS systems wanted
Date: 28 Sep 92 22:14:03 GMT
Organization: Charles River Data Systems

kilroy@acme.gen.nz (earthbound misfit, I) writes:
>I'm looking for info on commercial BBS systems available for running under
[...]
>-- 
>Craig Harding            kilroy@acme.gen.nz             ACME BBS +64 6 3551342
>"Jub'f Xvob?"

I'm also VERY interested in it too.  If there's any info available, please
forward to me and I'll summarize what I can.

My interestes are in PD/Shareware/Commercial/Contracted BBS.

Thanks for the time.
-- 
<< MCT >>  Michael C Tiernan. - GEnie:M.Tiernan - AOL:M Tiernan/BCS Mike 
UUCP = alfalfa!pro-angmar!m.tiernan OR miket@frog.UUCP
      It's too bad that it takes almost half of our life
	to realize that it was a "Do-It-Yourself" project.
From: a_millsbs@ccsvax.sfasu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.unixbbs
Subject: BBS packages for SCO 3.2.x ????
Date: 6 Oct 92 17:05:31 CST
Organization: Stephen F. Austin State University

I am looking for a good BBS package to run on a SCO Unix 3.2.x machine.

What are my options?

Thanks in advance,

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Scott Mills                            (409) 568-1134
Computer Center -- Technical Support,     Stephen F. Austin State University
a_millsbs@ccsvax.sfasu.edu                P.O. Box 13012 SFA Station
root@calvin.sfasu.edu                     Nacogdoches, TX  75962
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: alt.bbs.unixbbs
From: adam@cs.curtin.edu.au (Adam Sawyer)
Subject: Uniboard up for FTP PLEASE!?!?!
Summary: Will someone PLEASE put uniboard up for FTP
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 06:04:29 GMT


Hiya gyuz...


Would someone PLEASE put up Uniboard for FTP?  I live in Australia
and hus its a little expensive to ring the US...



Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.bbs.misc
From: ahall@nmsu.edu (HALL)
Subject: Re: boards under windows?
Organization: New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 22:32:36 GMT

Keith Ford (fordke@infonode.ingr.com) wrote:
: 
: I would like to hear from sysops who are operating boards within
: the MS Windows environment.  What software are you using?  How
: well does it behave?  Does it handle >9600 okay?  Can it run in
: the background?

Keith,
   I currently run Searchlight BBS under Windows 3.1 and 4Meg of RAM.  The
Version I use is still a beta test, you can get it if you buy a current release
of SL.  Yes SL is commercial, but IMP worth it.  I only run at 2400, although
9600 and above is supposed to work.  It runs in the background just great.
Even when a user is uploading or downloading I can switch to an editor, game,
or even another node of the BBS.  I forgot to mention that with the Multi 
version of SL, I run two nodes on one machine.
Darrell

Newsgroups: alt.bbs
From: nuffy@intelhf.hf.intel.com (John Hagler)
Subject: TEST...Dont Read this
Organization: Development Tools Operation, Intel Corp., Hillsboro  OR
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 92 19:24:39 GMT

 TESTING>>>>TESTING>>>>>TESTING>>>>

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Nuffy@hfglobe.intel.com       | "The views expressed here are mine! You cant  |
|                              |  have them! Intel cant have them! They're Mine||------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: aryeh@cash.ucsc.edu (Aryeh Friedman)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: I need the phone # for the Western Digital BBS
Date: 1 Oct 1992 10:20:12 GMT
Organization: Marsnet
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: cash.ucsc.edu

	I will for ever be in debt.
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: Coherent?
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 92 06:37:58 CDT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

peter@global.hacktic.nl (Peter Busser) writes:

> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>
> >Linux is free in the sense that you don't have to pay someone for the
> >rights to use it.  Most of us still have to pay to get it, however.  I
> >decided to call a couple of BBSs to get the base disks, since I don't
> >have direct ftp access.
>
> So did I to get my first copy of Linux. However, you might be able to get
> Linux on disk by mail. That might be cheaper.

Disks cost about $4 apiece.  With 15 disks, that's $60.

>
> >gotten the rest of the SLS distribution from tsx-11.mit.edu via DEC's
> >ftpmail server.  That means I've added a TON of time to the process just
> >decoding the stuff when it comes in.
>
> Bad luck for you.

Well, depends on your definition of bad luck.  I didn't feel like spending more
money, so the time offset the cost in this case.

>
> >No, Linux isn't free.
>
> It is free, but not necessarily in the sense of gratis.

Well, that's the bottom line to many people.  The noble sense of a 'free'
project doesn't move a lot of people into supporting it.  I have several
clients who would rather pay for a commercial software package rather than use
a 'free' one, simply because they don't trust the motives behind what is now a
'free' system.  It takes all kinds to make the world go around.

>
> >There is
> >definitely a case to be made for paying the bucks and getting Coherent.
>
> Coherent costs fl. 350,- here in Holland. One hour long distance is about
> fl. 6,- (in the evening). A decent UNIX book costs about >fl. 60,-. So buying
> Coherent is equal to buying 3 to 4 UNIX books and 10 hours downloading.

Well, Linux costs $60 to buy the SLS disks.  Combine that with a good Unix book
at ~$30, you're already there.  It's a wash.

>
> >As to Linux being more up-to-date, agreed, this is true.  However, a lot
> >will depend on what a person wants.  If someone wants to get into
> >uucp/mail/news, then maybe Coherent is a better idea, since the docs are
> >good.
>
> Linux has a Taylor UUCP port. The GNU emacs helpfiles which are part of Taylo
> UUCP are very good, just like the rest of the Taylor UUCP package. There is
> more information availlable than you (and I) know, but finding it is often th
> big problem.

Precisely why a decent manual up-front can make a big difference.



>Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us<
>Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087<
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Re: Coherent?
From: kilroy@acme.gen.nz (earthbound misfit, I)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 92 06:29:11 GMT
Organization: ACME BBS - Public Access Usenet, Palmerston North, New Zealand

davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen) writes:

> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
>
> | larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
> | 
> | > Why in earth would anyone want to run Coherent with Linux
> | > and BSD386 available?

> |         3.  The docs for both Linux and 386BSD, in a word, suck.  Buying
> |             a couple of books that will help a newbie figure out what
> |             they're doing will cost close to a hundred bucks anyway.
> 
>   I have mixed feelings about this, I'm pretty sure you will need a good
> book if you've never used UNIX, even with Coherent. 

I can only speak from personal experience here, but I found the Coherent
manual to be very good. I had no experience with un*x prior to purchasing
Coherent, so I was learning from scratch solely from the Coherent manual,
and I found it to be great.

The main criticism I'd have with the Coherent manual is that it doesn't go
into enough detail. Eventually, you reach a level where you have questions
that are not answered in the book, and you start having to look for more
detailed reference manuals.

						- k
-- 
Craig Harding            kilroy@acme.gen.nz             ACME BBS +64 6 3551342
"Jub'f Xvob?"
From: marcel@proxxi.se (Marcel Bos (SDF))
Newsgroups: alt.bbs
Subject: Voicemail a Reality. Thougts why!
Summary: its like the evelotion.. first 300 baud then after 64Kbps..
Keywords: debate hamradio future problems
Date: 18 Sep 92 23:40:42 GMT
Organization: proxxi

Voicemail is the key for normal peopel around the world to use the nets
for what we have been used them for years. Thats my vision. There
are (sort to say ) more phones made on this planet than terminals..

The problem now is to get alots of others intrested in the techology.
One day it could be so that it is just only to pickup the phone for a
connect to anther part of the world. 'just for free' in the term of 
the good 'voicemailers' spirit.

Just for the time am on a projekt that is suposed to supply
voicemail for stockholm hamradio operators. In the end we will try
to send voicepackets over radio for transportation to other voicemail 
nodes..

If you like to support our project in different terms. Then 
reply on this one..
 
Newsgroups: alt.bbs,comp.unix.misc
From: a-dent@somenode.uucp (Bryan Hannahs)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 92 17:48:29 EDT
Organization: .sdrawkcaB sgnihT gnipyT roF yteicoS ehT

dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz writes:

> I was under the impression that alt.bbs.waffle had been rmgrouped about
> 3 months ago, however I've started receiving messages intended for that
> group in my junk file over the last few days.
> 
> Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried?
> 
> I assumed it was, as comp.bbs.waffle is very much alive and kicking.
> 
> Perhaps it's a zombie group. :-)

A few days after the rmgroup, someone sent a newgroup alt.bbs.waffle.
Most of us just ignore it.

---
"Man created God in his own image." - Lazarus Long

Bryan Hannahs      |   a-dent@somenode.uucp    a-dent@bluemoon.use.com
(aka Arthur Dent)  |               bryan@bluemoon.use.com
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
From: ralphs@halcyon.com (Ralph Sims)
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Organization: The 23:00 News and Mail Service +1 206 382 MAIL (382-6245)
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 05:41:43 GMT

moon!cyberden!system@well.sf.ca.us writes:
: dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz writes:

: > Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried?

: Yes.

Oh, ye of little faith.

Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4720 comp.bbs.waffle:2688
From: rider@geloser.login.qc.ca (Serge Ayotte)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle
Subject: Re: os/2 2.0 and waf
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 19:35:03 EDT
Distribution: world
Organization: Gentleman Loser System, Montreal/Qc/Cdn

dalew@twiki.PDX.COM (Dale Weber) writes:

> michaelc@obmarket (Michael Campbell) writes:
> 
> > Could some kind soul running os/2 and waffle 1.6x mail me? I'd like
> > some pointers on How-To-Do-It.
> 
>   OS/2 2.0 doesn't appear to like DOS communications apps at all.  Nothing
> I have tried so far to run Waffle under OS/2 2.0 has worked, or at least it
> hasn't worked acceptably - lots of transmission errors.
> 

HUmmm... Then I must be a special case since I've been running Waffle
under OS/2 for the past 3 months WITHOUT any trouble!! Ok, I have only a
2400 Baud modem, that might be the difference but I haven't done
anything special, exept for enabling backgroud and the comm setting for
that dos session, after MIGRATING a bat files (a modified one that I used
with windowse) wich contains the following;

@ECHO OFF
path c:\os2;c:\os2\msdos;c:\;c:\dos;f:\waffle\bin
f:
cd\
cls
set waffle=f:\waffle\system\static
[rest deleted being a copy of the original run.bat]

> > I need advice from the ground up.  With all the batch files, and several
> > environment/path settings, I'm not sure where to start under os/2.
> 

I'll mail you more info if you wish Micheal, BUT like I mention, if your
running a high speed modem, I might suggest you ask for more
explaination on the comp.os.os2.misc newsgroup, I simply have a 2400
like mentioned previously...

>   What we really need is a native OS/2 2.0 port of Waffle.  I am eventually
> going to invest in an OS/2 'C' compiler (probably Watcom 'C' 9.0/386) but
> that won't be for awhile.  I don't know if Tom has any plans to port Waffle
> over to OS/2 2.0 or not at this time.
> 

With that, I'll agree... My apologies for the non-waffle following...
But Dale, have you taken a look at the shareware c++ compiler
(GCC 2.2.2) available on ftp-os2.nmsu.edu?


Serge Ayotte

DOS=HIGH? I knew it was on something...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| rider@geloser.cam.org | Gentleman Loser System, Montreal, Qc, Canada |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
From: kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan)
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Organization: The Rhode Island Internet Systems Cooperative Network
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 12:02:01 GMT

a-dent@somenode.uucp (Bryan Hannahs) writes:

>A few days after the rmgroup, someone sent a newgroup alt.bbs.waffle.
>Most of us just ignore it.

Unfortunately, sites running C-News will automatically create it.

More than likely the culprit was Bruce Becker. The simple solution to
bypassing a Becker-autonewgroup is to add the line:
to your posting. This will "fool" the news software into thinking that
it has already sent the posting to becker's site. Thus, he won't see it,
and rmgroups that he can't see, he can't newgroup.

MD
-- 
--  Michael P. Deignan                      / Sex is hereditary. If your 
--  Domain: mpd@anomaly.sbs.com            /  parents never had it, chances 
--    UUCP: ...!uunet!rayssd!anomaly!mpd  /   are you won't either...
-- Telebit: +1 401 455 0347              /
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4725 comp.bbs.waffle:2965 alt.config:6057
From: moon!cyberden!system@well.sf.ca.us
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
Subject: Re: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 92 15:12:20 PDT
Organization: Indescribable Creations

dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz writes:

> Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried?

Yes.


__________________________________________________________________________
   |       /         |\
   | H E   \ Y B E R |/ E N       [ moon!cyberden!system@well.sf.ca.us ]
Xref: sparky alt.bbs.waffle:4722 comp.bbs.waffle:2925 alt.config:6038
From: dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle,alt.config
Subject: alt.bbs.waffle - Has it been rmgrouped yet?
Summary: Rmgroup of redundant group?
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 92 02:00:09 +1200
Followup-To: alt.bbs.waffle comp.bbs.waffle alt.config
Organization: The Dawghaus BBS, Palmerston North, New Zealand (+64 6 357 9245)



I was under the impression that alt.bbs.waffle had been rmgrouped about
3 months ago, however I've started receiving messages intended for that
group in my junk file over the last few days.

Is alt.bbs.waffle dead and buried?

I assumed it was, as comp.bbs.waffle is very much alive and kicking.

Perhaps it's a zombie group. :-)



dogbowl@dogbox.acme.gen.nz
The Dawghaus BBS, Palmerston North, New Zealand (+64 6 357 9245)


Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.bbs.waffle