From: porayath@IASTATE.EDU (Rajiv Porayath)
Subject: Re: re:Khalistan
Reply-To: porayath@IASTATE.EDU (Rajiv Porayath)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 07:18:01 GMT

In article <Z88euB5w165w@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>, garyd@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Gary
Deol) writes:
> A reply to a message written by the idiot: mkatyal@opie.bgsu.edu
>  
> >Do you want us Hindus to again kick your ugly butts as in 1984? 
>              ^^^^^^^^^
>              /\ Remember this statement when the next time
>                 a Hindu asks me `did you ask ALL Hindus'.
>                                              ^^^^^^^^^^
>  
>   Oh you guys must have felt SO PROUD having to use over a dozen army 
> units to attack Bhindranwale's estimated 300-400 men, and even
> then they were kicking your ass until you guys in a last ditch effort
> decided to bring in Tanks, and Gun boat helicopters (were the Nuclear 
> war heads ready to?), whatever happened to chivalry (let me take that 
> back after all this is Hindus we are talking about).  The Indian 
> military had over a thousand casualties, so to make other Hindus feel 
> it was a great military victory they went and killed a few thousand 
> innocent people who had went there to pray!  Quoting a few army 
> jewans in 1984 "this was the tuffest battle I have ever fought".   
>  
>  
>   We may have lost that battle but the war isn't over, next time we 
> meet I assure you the odds (instead of 1000 trained soliders 
> to 1 Sikh) and weapons (they mostly had rifles compared to Indian 
> troops fully automatic machine guns and rocket launchers) will be 
> much fair (we are already buying and stockpiling (no country shall me
> mentioned :^) the latest in high tech weapons and training Sikhs) and 
> then we will see who prevails! 
>  
>  
>   General Shubeg Singh must of been this centuries greatest 
> strategist because every single trap that he had laid, the Indian 
> gov't army (the very one that boasts that it is the fourth strongest 
> in the world) fell for, and you guys want to go fight Pakistan, does 
> the term blood bath mean anything to you?
>  
> 
> Gary Deol              garyd@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca 
  

Do you know that the Indian army did not destroy your holy gold canopy of the
temple from where your brave fighters were firing, the paratroopers who went
in did not wear their shoes least they descreate your holy temple. Tanks were 
not used at all and the terrorist fired anti-personnel mortars from inside the 
temple. They were not fighting with rifles but LMG's and HMG's and your
fighters
were hiding behind woman and children in the temple while firing at the army.

If the army wanted to destroy the terrorists all they needed to do was blow up
the whole temple with artillery fire. It would have be all over in an hour. So
don't  underestimate the indian military power, we have the third largest 
military might and unlike the pakistani army are professional fighters not
military dictators. And if you think pakistan is going to help you, see what 
they did with the Kashmiri march. They know an all out military conflict with
us would herald the tomestone of pakisthan as a nation. We have already cut 
them up once.

You are right the war is not over, until terrorism is destroyed, the war
goes on..

--RAJIV PORAYATH
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian