HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pksuk@mothra.syr.EDU (Peter K. Suk)
Subject: Re: Time Travel and Causality Violation
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 92 20:41:04 EST

In article <1992Dec10.221507.1006@spock.UUCP> 
dsohl@spock.uucp (Daniel Sohl) writes:

>>[lots of stuff deleted]
>WHAT??????? I'm relly confused. Perhaps if you re-explained it... in English
>this time! <G>
>-- 
>"Life is like a grapefruit."     *                       -- Dan Sohl
>"Er, how so?"                    *****************************************
>"Well, it's sort of orangy-yellow on the outside, pink and squidgy on the*
> inside. Oh, yeah, and some people have half a one for breakfast."       *

Exactly who are you talking to?

	--PKS


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: petitc@nuge112.its.rpi.edu (Christopher Jon Petit)
Subject: Re: This Borg Thing (Was Re: How to Kill a Borg)
Keywords: Assimilate
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 18:07:42 GMT

walter@inga1.acc.stolaf.edu (Dr. Egon Spengler) writes:

>     Even though all the newsgroups, discussion and all this stuff is 
>irrelevant and will be assimilated, I would like to contribute my 2.4 D-Marks
>before assimilation into the collective:  (This may reek of 
>alt.french.captain.borg.borg.borg, but bare with me) 
>          SUCH DISCUSSION IS IRRELEVANT.  RESISTANCE TO THE BORG IS USELESS.
>THERE IS NO WAY TO STOP THE BORG. 

  Actually, I heard this somewhere, I think alt.startrek.creative.  I think
you'll like it:

BTW:  Now that ST:NG is coming to a close, is Picard (not Stewart,
Picard) now reduced to becoming the voice for those RCA VCRs?
recall that bumper sticker:  "Picard-Riker '92"  or my personal
favorite...
"This is Locutus of Bob Borg Pontiac.  Right now, all our Pontiacs
are 15% off.  Have bad credit?  Credit is irrelevant.  You will be 
assimilated into the Borg easy-payment plan..."


-- 
Now on sale, in Aisle 5 of the Divine Supermarket---Lives, and Clues.  Buy
yours now and avoid the rush!  They make great Christmas gifts!
Cynicism is only realism projected into the future.
If your fondest wish is to fly, don't draw up plans for flippers.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: StarOwl@uiuc.edu (StarOwl)
Subject: Re: Gaining momentum from shuttlebay
Reply-To: StarOwl@uiuc.edu
Organization: Actuarial Science Program at UIUC
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:28:00 GMT

petitc@nuge111.its.rpi.edu (Christopher Jon Petit) writes:
>jcharpak@acs.bu.edu (Joseph Charpak) writes:

>>No .sig so shoot me (red alert...shields up)

>  Are these the 'old generation' shields?  'cuz if they're the 'next
>generation---'improved' ' shields, one shot will drop them.  :&)

I wonder if the rapid failure of the new & improved "next generation"
shields has anything to do with the new & improved "next generation" weapons.

;)

--
Michael D. Adams       (aka StarOwl)	| Of all sexual aberrations, chastity
StarOwl@uiuc.edu       (NeXT mail OK)	| is the strangest. -- Anatole France
anon.46@pax.tpa.com.au (anonymously)	|------------------------------------
an692@anon.penet.fi    (anonymously)	| NBCS: B1f+t-w+g+k++s+me+h-qv	     
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman)
Subject: Re: Re-setting the Enterprises clocks
Organization: The Admiral's Unix System & The Grid BBS
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 08:21:20 GMT

In article <Bz0p20.Iw1@cs.dal.ca> sweet@ug.cs.dal.ca (garth r sweet) writes:
>In article <g5c2r4p@rpi.edu> petitc@nuge113.its.rpi.edu (Christopher Jon Petit) writes:
>>qtm2w@Virginia.EDU ("Quinn T. McCord") writes:
>>
>>
>>>	Perhaps this has been discussed before.  As seen in
>>>Cause and Effect, there are Federation time beacons that put
>>>out measures of absolute time.  Fine.  In the episode Clues,
>>>Data puts the clocks back so no one will know what happened,
>>>but wouldn't everyone figure it out sooner or later when
>>>accessing one of these beacons or even putting in at the next
>>>starbase?
>>
>>  Well, I'd guess that it has to be a conscious action---it's not automatic.
>>And it's so trivial that I don't think Data would have any problem---after all
>>who would think to check the beacons if they never knew about the 3 intervening
>>days?
>>-- 
>
>	Umm, you don't think that the next time they pull into starbase,
>someone will notice the entire Enterprise crew thinks it's Wednesday, not
>Saturday? Or for that matter that the Enterprise crew will not notice
>that the starfleet/family/public communications they recieved are all
>3 days 'behind'?

Well, if you re-watch the episode, when everyone regains consciousness from the
black-out, Data informs the captain that the ship's clocks are approximately
24 hours out of sync with the nearest time beacon. He then goes on to say that
the "wormhole" they passed through probably produced some temporal displacement,
and asks if he should re-calibrate ship's time. Picard says yes, and that's
that. 


-- 
"Dammit Jim, I'm a free man, not a number!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Ray, when somebody asks you if you're a god, you say YES!" -- Winston Zeddmore
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: genius@tradent.wimsey.bc.ca (Michael Cooper)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
Subject: Re: Scale 1/1 1701A-impossible dream?: -)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 92 22:13:35 PST
Organization: TradeNET International Trade Corp.

Sounds like a great idea now.  I like the idea of building the thing 
underground.  It makes it a lot more structurally sound.  I would rather 
not mix two ships, though.  What I would do is build the thing how it is 
supposed to be.  You don't have to have replicators, though.  Some things 
like that are better left out of it (dumbwaiters might lessen the 
experience).  You could use the bridge as a security area (in a project 
that big you have to be careful).  Lots of monitors and stuff.  Make it 
fun even for the staff.  I like the "Theme weekend" idea where you have 
missions.  You could have such things occur every other weekend or 
something.  It isn't all that huge a project (I won't say it is small, 
but...).  All of the quarters could be used for accomodations (there are 
obviously a lot of them in the ship design).  Neat idea for sure.  About 
$500 a night would cover it.  The ship itself would serve as a museum, 
and there is no real need to see the outside (hence the underground 
construction).  Yeah, what else could you have?

                                                        Michael Cooper
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: mcclaine@hardy.u.washington.edu (Robert Casey)
Subject: Re: How to Kill a Borg; Transporter= terrible weapon
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 03:20:38 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.173554.3883@beaver.cs.washington.edu> forman@cs.washington.edu (George Forman) writes:
>Since our guys were able to beam on and off their ship, then
>you could just beam all of their brains out into space (or energy).
>
>You could spend awhile locking on to all their brains, then 
>beam them out together.   Or beam out their power sources.
>Or could you beam some anti-matter into their living room?
>(or anti-beam the anti-matter.)
>

	I don't think the sensors can have that kind of precision when it
comes to "locking on".  Generally, they are lucky if they can pinpoint the
correct "blob of mass" within the confines of a ship.


	_/_/_/_/   _/_/_/_/   _/_/_/    NEW FOR 1993: 
	_/     _/  _/       _/     _/   The Ronald Reagan Commemorative 
	_/     _/  _/       _/                    Typewriter
	_/_/_/_/   _/_/_/   _/              
	_/   _/    _/       _/          This is the one you've been waiting 
	_/    _/   _/       _/     _/   for; the only one with no memory 
	_/     _/  _/_/_/_/   _/_/_/  	and no colon!
	Robert E. Casey  (mcclaine@hardy.u.washington.edu)

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: MLINDROOS@FINABO.ABO.FI (Marcus Lindroos INF)
Subject: Re: Scale 1/1 1701A-impossible dream?: -)
Organization: Abo Akademi University, Finland
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 13:56:28 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

Hm, any idea what it would cost? A saucer 140 meters across would be a
significant building, about the size of a basketball/hockey arena - the roof on
top of
it anyway. Montreal had to pay $21 million to install a retractable roof over
their Olympic Stadium in 1987... A full-scale "mockup" of the Enterprise saucer
without any rooms or facilities inside might cost about that much. Disney
reportedly take in some $1000 million annually, so it wouldn't be difficult for
them to finance the construction of our own NCC-1701-A:-)

MARCU$
Posted-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 00:03:52 -0600
Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 00:02:56 CST
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 00:03:52 -0600
From: Otto Heuer #3 <ottoh3@cfsmo.honeywell.com>
To: rec.arts.startrek.tech
Subject: FAQL: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS LIST for rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: jsbell@acs.ucalgary.ca (Joshua Bell)
Subject: Re: Re-setting the Enterprises clocks
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 11:51:03 GMT
Organization: The University of Calgary, Alberta

In article <s2f2f5b@rpi.edu> petitc@nuge114.its.rpi.edu (Christopher Jon Petit) writes:
>jsbell@acs.ucalgary.ca (Joshua Bell) writes:
>>(Which, BTW, is one of the few 'realistic' ways of time travel...
>>ignoring of course the fact that you'd be squashed into spaghetti
>>when you tried it.)
>
>  Why would you be squished?  Gravitational tides?  I thought that any such
>tides would NOT affect the Enterprise when it had its shields up, since the
>shields are also gravitationally-based.  Or is the effect way too strong to
>shield againt (Q notwithstanding)?

Methinks it'd be too strong. If the shields were that powerful,
the -D wouldn't be in danger every week:

Picard: "Mr. Worf, raise shields."

Worf: "Shields at maximum. The Vogons are firing."

[We see massive explosions on the viewscreen.]

Riker: "What happened? We didn't get thrown back and forth!"

Worf: "The shields held, sir. No damage... no casualties."

See? It'd be boring! :)

Regardless, I don't quite see how the Enterprise could fit
through a singularity. And in any event, whenever something tries
to pass through a wormhole the wormhole collapses into two very
seperate, very hungry singularities. Munch munch. (At least
according to a Discover magazine a few years back. Your milage
may vary. :)

Joshua
|         A shimmering net undulating like an infinite borealis.             |
|                                                  - Chapterhouse: Dune      |
|                                                                            |
| jsbell@acs.ucalgary.ca  Academic Computing Services, University of Calgary |

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: petitc@nuge102.its.rpi.edu (Christopher Jon Petit)
Subject: Re: How to Kill a Borg
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 06:25:00 GMT

oberoc@bourbon.ee.tulane.edu (Tino W. Dai) writes:

>How to kill a borg
>1) Let them assimalate a bunch of people which split personalities

>2)Beam hydrogen and a match over to the borg ship

>3)Have the really cute Q (the girl) destory them

>4)Beam Sam Donaldson over to them

>5)Implant into the collective conscienciness the ganes:Tetris, SimCity,
>  Wing Commander 1 and II, etc

 You forgot some other useful ways:

6) Beam Wesley over and have him talk to them.  As an added bonus, when he
   kills them off, you can blow up the ship and be rid of him as well.

7) Send them an endless stream of crummy jokes.

8) Have O'Brien turn off the Heisenberg Compensators and then beam each Borg
   over on the premise that the crew will let themselves be assimilated.

9) Beam over five tribbles and tons of grain.

10) Have the writers erase the Borg from the script.

-- 
Now on sale, in Aisle 5 of the Divine Supermarket---Lives, and Clues.  Buy
yours now and avoid the rush!  They make great Christmas gifts!
"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right
to say it."  - Voltaire.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: wjhrc@rc.rit.edu (Bill Hoagland)
Subject: Stardate Question
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.tech
Organization: RIT Research Corporation
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:33:49 GMT


Oh knowledgeable ones,

I understand that the accepted wisdom is that 1000 statdate units equals
one
earth year.

Could someone tell me when this went in to effect by our calendar?

Thanx,

Bill Hoagland
wjhrc@rc.rit.edu
From: kkepkep@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (DragonClaw)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
Subject: shuttle craft
Date: 20 Dec 92 20:11:25 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


  Does anybody know how many shuttles there are on the Enterprise and what
 their names are?

								DC
From: starman@crash.amigans.gen.nz (Robin Halligan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
Subject: Re: orientation
Date: 15 Dec 92 19:23:36 PST
Reply-To: starman@crash.amigans.gen.nz
Organization: No organisation at all
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Andrew Nipperess (andrew.nipperess@f605.n712.z3.fido.zeta.org.au) wrote:
: Original to: Drew@Tcom.Stc.Co.Uk
: -On the day of 11-16-00  13:51, Scooby Doo spoke unto All, and he did
: sayeth-
:  
:  Dr> I'm sure that in a number of episodes, the Captain (eg. Kirk)
:  Dr> has said something along the lines of 'change course to one four three
:  Dr> mark two' 
:  Dr> Assuming that 143 is akin to a heading and that 'mark 2' might have
:  Dr> something to do with the attitude of the ship this implies they may 
:  Dr> have somekind of 'map'
:  Dr> or atleast someway of orientating themselves. Though perhaps this
:  Dr> could be a relative figure, changing course 143 degrees from the
:  Dr> current course.... 
: 
:  From memory, in the TNG Tech Manual, navigation uses spherical coordinates.
:  For example- set course 165 mark 60 would mean change course to 165 degrees
:  from going forward, then point 60 degrees up. 
: 
:  However, going down would need the coordinates --- mark -60 (wouldn't it?) 
:  but I've never noticed a negative mark value mentioned.
: 
:                         Nipper
                                   o                        o
Maybe not think of straight up as 0 and straight down as 180
then it should work.

--
JUST FOR A CHANGE I WILL TRY THIS.
fgnezna@penfu.nzvtnaf.tra.am  (Ebova Unyyvtna)
Nzvtnaf Choyvp Npprff HHPC Abqr Jnatnahv Arj Mrnynaq

V'z n X 1 J 1 sebz gur ynaq bs gur ybat juvgr pybhq
    sebz gur qnl v ortha gvyy gur qnl v'z qbar
                     V'z n X1J1
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: stanford@leland.Stanford.EDU (Scott Stanford)
Subject: Re: Scale 1/1 1701A-impossible dream?: -)
Organization: none whatsoever
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 18:52:06 GMT

In article <1..2..3..6> genius@tradent.wimsey.bc.ca (Michael Cooper) writes:
>Sounds like a great idea now.  I like the idea of building the thing 
>underground.  It makes it a lot more structurally sound.

[stuff omitted]

>and there is no real need to see the outside (hence the underground 
>construction).  Yeah, what else could you have?
>
>                                                        Michael Cooper

Actually, I think it would be cooler to have it outdoors to get an
idea of the size of the thing, but underground makes more sense both
structurally, and also in that you shouldn't be able to look outside
your cabin and see daylight and trees.

How about having a lightweight full scale model above ground, a
"transport station" on ground level which brings you "on board" which
is in reality below the ground?

My $0.02,
Scott
-- 
Scott Stanford                 |)  Eenie meenie miney moe.
stanford@leland.stanford.edu  /|   Catch a tiger by the toe.
                             ((|,) If he hollers...yeah whatEVER.
"MORE Doctah Peppah!!"        ~|~  He's EATIN' your ass.  Run, you idiot.
From: mcclaine@hardy.u.washington.edu (Robert Casey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
Subject: Re: orientation
Date: 13 Dec 92 19:53:29 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Dec13.195329.28888
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

In article <3_712_605.02b256046@Kralizec.fido.zeta.org.au> andrew.nipperess@f605.n712.z3.fido.zeta.org.au (Andrew Nipperess) writes:
>Original to: Drew@Tcom.Stc.Co.Uk
> 
> Dr> I'm sure that in a number of episodes, the Captain (eg. Kirk)
> Dr> has said something along the lines of 'change course to one four three
> Dr> mark two'..... 


>
> From memory, in the TNG Tech Manual, navigation uses spherical coordinates.
> For example- set course 165 mark 60 would mean change course to 165 degrees
> from going forward, then point 60 degrees up. 
>
> However, going down would need the coordinates --- mark -60 (wouldn't it?) 
> but I've never noticed a negative mark value mentioned.
>
>                        Nipper
>

	You are correct on your first point.  However, your second point is
unnecessary concern.  Chances are that you would not hear a negative pitch 
heading (-60 degrees) instead, you would hear a positive value closer to 360
degrees, right?  -60 degrees is also 300 degrees.

	I have noticed, though, that in the original series especially, the
"mark" number was always a small value.  I wonder if they used a different
scale instead of degrees at that time.  Perhaps it abbreviates degrees by 
dividing by ten (mark 2 = 20 degrees pitch) or maybe they used a clock scale
(mark 2 = 2 o'clock up).   I am uncertain of what to make of this.


>... I considered atheism, but there weren't enough holidays.

	Ha ha ha!  I like it.



	_/_/_/_/   _/_/_/_/   _/_/_/    NEW FOR 1993: 
	_/     _/  _/       _/     _/   The Ronald Reagan Commemorative 
	_/     _/  _/       _/                    Typewriter
	_/_/_/_/   _/_/_/   _/              
	_/   _/    _/       _/          This is the one you've been waiting 
	_/    _/   _/       _/     _/   for; the only one with no memory 
	_/     _/  _/_/_/_/   _/_/_/  	and no colon!
	Robert E. Casey  (mcclaine@hardy.u.washington.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: sweet@ug.cs.dal.ca (garth r sweet)
Subject: Re: Handicapped on TNG
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 11:57:27 GMT

Christopher Jon Petit (petitc@vccnw07.its.rpi.edu) wrote:
> sweet@ug.cs.dal.ca (garth r sweet) writes:
> 
> 
> >	Having just seen the TNG episode "Too Short a Season" it seems
> >that people do indeed need "wheelchairs" in TNG, they don't seem to have
> >wheels, rather they hum and float, but they do exist. The Enterprise
> >even seems to handle them well except they didn't show Jameson moving
> >around much in it to really tell for sure. The chair sure seemed nice
> >though except it was very bulky. 
> 
>   Would someone tell me why nobody bothered to use the neural stimulators for
> him (the ones they offered to let Worf use when he broke his back)?
> 
> 

	Worf was recovering from an operation, and would use those to
help him adjust to the new spine and to ease him back into full function,
Jameson had a crippling desease, not an injury further compounded by old
age. For him they may stimulate his muscles into working beyond the limits
in which they can handle, making them even worse and the desease wouldn't
allow the muscles to recover from damage either. I think! :-)

+---------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
+ Name : Garth Sweet        + Man goes into a garage and says:             +
+ email: sweet@ug.cs.dal.ca + "I want a new windshield wiper for my Lada." +
+ phone: 902-865-8987       + Garage owner says:                           +
+                           + "Sounds like a fair trade to me."            +
+---------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: JAM@ECL.PSU.EDU (Joseph A Miranda)
Subject: Re: Gaining momentum from shuttlebay
Organization: Penn State Engineering Computer Lab
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 92 17:45:39 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

Is there any reason why they shouldn't have used both the shuttle bay
decompression and the tractor beam?
From: cosc1871@elroy.uh.edu (92F06787)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
Subject: Re: ropes in TNG?
Date: 20 Dec 1992 16:47 CST
Organization: University of Houston
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: elroy.uh.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

In article <102736@netnews.upenn.edu>, kkepkep@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (DragonClaw) writes...
> 
> 
>  Hi. I just watched the new episode. I was wondering why Picard, Worf and
> Crusher were climbing down the cliff using ropes. I am sure they have 
> some equipment like anti-grav belts or simple mechanical gadgets to aid
> the climbers in the 24th century. Any ideas why they used conventionel
> methods?

They could have used Spock's flight boots (ST V.  Personally, I think
they weren't used because someone forgot.  It couldn't have been of stealth
reasons because that blasted tricorder gave off light/sound and other
forms of energy.  They didn't better announce their presence when they 
fired their phaser at setting '16'.  A poor commando team at best.

Happy holly-daze...


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: pksuk@mothra.syr.EDU (Peter K. Suk)
Subject: Re: How to Kill a Borg; Transporter= terrible weapon
Organization: Adhocracy of Enlightened Self Interest, Research
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 92 11:42:44 EST

In article <1992Dec16.032038.5665@u.washington.edu> 
mcclaine@hardy.u.washington.edu (Robert Casey) writes:

>In article <1992Dec14.173554.3883@beaver.cs.washington.edu> 
>forman@cs.washington.edu (George Forman) writes:
>
>>Since our guys were able to beam on and off their ship, then
>>you could just beam all of their brains out into space (or energy).
>>
>>You could spend awhile locking on to all their brains, then 
>>beam them out together.   Or beam out their power sources.
>>Or could you beam some anti-matter into their living room?
>>(or anti-beam the anti-matter.)

There is a precedent for beaming anti-matter, and a mass of anti-matter
equivalent to Data and Worf would surely have destroyed the Borg ship
from inside.

	--Peter Kwangjun Suk

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: gtapolow@nyx.cs.du.edu (Greg Tapolow)
Subject: Re: Tricorders -- What's the Difference?
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 92 15:38:39 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.054358.751@Radical.Com> Jim_Brownfield@Radical.Com writes:
>In article <1992Dec12.222840.26016@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> cmeadows@nyx.cs.du.edu  
>(Chris Meadows) writes:
>> 
>> More questions about tricorders:
>> 
>> In the ST:TNG Technical Manual, two models of tricorder are mention-
>> ed--the TR-580 and the TR-595H(P).  What's the difference between
>> the two--only the TR-580 seems to be shown, unless the TR-595H(P) is
>> the medical tricorder, for which no designation seems to be given.
>[stuff deleted]
>> Chris Meadows // CHM173S@SMSVMA // CMEADOWS@NYX.CS.DU.EDU
>
>TR-595H(P) is the tricorder with the "Real Abraham Lincoln" detection grid. :=)
>
I believe someone said the tricorder code TR-580 was meant as an inside
joke refering to one of the highest (snicker) quality (sniff)
computers...The TRS-80. >;-()

--
Begining my quest for the ultimate (working)    Greg A. Tapolow
sig						gtapolow@nyx.cs.du.edu
all rights turned left				probably at albequerque
From: cosc182n@menudo.uh.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
Subject: Re: Who would win?
Date: 19 Dec 1992 22:30:59 -0600
Organization: University of Houston
NNTP-Posting-Host: menudo.uh.edu
Summary: Trek vs Trek and Trek vs Dr Who



Mudd vs a Ferengi Daemon
Spock vs Data in a 3d chessa game
Bones vs Crusher in patching up Spock
Sarek (Original) vs Sarek (TNG)
Borg vs Tholian 

Dr. Who vs Trek

Dr Who vs Bones in a battle of wits
K9 vs Data
Tardis vs Enterprise
Cybermen vs Borg
Daliks vs Borg

Anyone vs Borg


						cosc182n@menudo.uh.edu
______________________________________________________________________________
Beam me ep Scotty : ENGAGE! : Damit Jim I'm a doctor no a ... : Dr? Who's that?

Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.info