HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mitch@cdthq.UUCP (Mitch Harris)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 10:23:36 CDT
Organization: Garys' Home for Obsolete Computers

Sorry, folks, I tried to follow this post with my comments, without my
husband here to help me. *Big* mistake. What I was trying to say was -
Devon was not gay. She had a friendship with a character played by Donna
Prescow, who was gay. Devon had a brief episode of sexual orientation
confusion (caused by a writer trying to be  enlightened -he was obviously
shot down by his fellow writers), before deciding she was a raging
heterosexual. Donna Prescow wasn't on the show long. Who remembers Cliff
Warner asking her out (during one of his many separations from Nina), &
finding out, to his embarrassment that she was gay?

*****************************************************************************

          .......Beverly H.

****************************************************************************
From: steveh@grafex.cupertino.ca.us (Steve Harding KA6ETB)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: Antilukering Device
Date: 28 Jul 92 23:13:05 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: The GRAFex Company

alice@socrates.umd.edu (Alice Myers) writes:

> Well, after lurking around for a while I decided to
> join the party.  Looked like you all were having sooo
> much fun that I overcame my shyness.

I'm glad you did.
 
> After watching yesterday's show, I have to join the
> crowd about the Franster.  I actually found myself
> cheering her on.  See Frantic run.  Run Frantic run.
> 
> Did anyone else notice that no matter how many times
> she "frantically" ran her hands through her hair, it
> looked great.  Geeze my hair only looks like that for
> the first 12 seconds after I put the hairspray down.
> 
> I have to go rest after all the social activity.
> My heart's not used to it.

It's not your heart we're after (evil leer).

steve
From: 22302LMK@MSU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB:  major spoiler
Date: 30 Jul 92 16:36:25 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University

------------------------- Original Article -------------------------
From: glb3833@sjfc.UUCP (Gidget Bowden)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: SB:  major spoiler
Date: 30 Jul 92 01:44:17 GMT
Organization: St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY

Warning:  this article contains a major spoiler!
I got this off prodigy, and thought I should share it with those
interested.




Nicholas Walker leaves the role of FRANK in late August due to storyline
developments, but he's philosophical about it.  Nicholas is a vet of two
other soaps and hopes to be a working actor again very soon.

So, any ideas on what will happen?????

Hey Gidget I posted this yesterday.....don't worry maybe Reese and Cruz will
let Jodie handle Frank, she looked ready to kill yesterday

I don't really like Warren and BJ together. Right now BJ is too fragile to hand
le any type of a relationship. I love Warren and Angela and Angela and Ted.

Lisa

--Gidget



--
***************************************************************************
* God did not create the world in seven days.          * Gidget L. Bowden *
* He partied for six, and then pulled an all-nighter!  * glb3833@sjfc.edu *
***************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: LHAAS@kentvm.kent.edu (Leslie M. Haas)
Subject: Re: GL:  Comments
Organization: Kent State Univ.
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 20:12:44 GMT

I hope they stop this Lillian and Ed thing before it gets out of hand.
I think every soap should have at least one happily married couple on a
show and GL is batting 0!  I cannot think of one married couple that is
not about to have or is currently having problems in their marriage.
 
BTW, Does anyone else want to see Roger get his comeuppance but good?
I am rooting for Hart to join forces with someone to bring down his father.
(Yes, I know I am carrying on)  Also, please give Dylan a decent job and a
storyline.  This actor is going to waste.  Whatever happened to Sam?
 
Thats all for now... Les
 
 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Kim is Road Pizza
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 19:41:02 GMT

In article <9207211959.AA15817@ap1pyr.us.oracle.com> escheele@us.oracle.com ("Erik Scheele") writes:
>
>[The Mad Poet's in a better mood today... 
> still bummed about Molly & Tanner, though]


Poor guy.  Maybe they'll come back one day and everyone will diss Molly
and gripe about her leaving in the first place and then you'll know how
I feel.  :-)


>>Well, I thought the staging of the whole thing was pretty lame, but when Kim
>>actually got hit it looked real.  I can't believe no one has commented yet
>>on the extended shot of Kim screaming with her large, ahem, ample-sized mouth
>>open.  :-)
>
>Just give me a little time, bro!  I agree with you about the staging of the
>accident-- that choppy slo-mo didn't cut it.  The tumble was good (surprising
>that a soap could afford a good stunt-horse), but didn't Kim seem to be in

They probably picked up one in line at the glue factory.


>worse shape (cuts, bruises, blood, etc.) AFTER the surgery?  She didn't seem
>too badly beaten up when she was lying there in the street.


I would think this makes sense. Don't bruises and scrapes always look worse
the next day?


>Anyway, about "the scream."  Acutally, a horse didn't come to mind.  The mouth
>was just TOO big.  I was thinking more of Aliens...   >8-D


Yeah, it did look a little like Alien.  But I still like Stacy's vampire
reference best.


>>At least Shane didn't actually walk.  That would have been *too* unbelievable.
>
>Why not?  When Shane was in danger of having the stable roof fall on him, it
>cured Kim's hysterical blindness!


But Erik, that is very well within the realm of possibility.  It only makes
sense that a tramatic event would cure *hysterical* blindness.


>Hasta,
>Core Onary, the Mad Poet

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
|  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
|  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: noonan@sonata.enet.dec.com (Costumes & Makeup and *Kliegs*, oh my!)
Subject: Re: SB: Where is everybody?
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: 27 JUL 92 12:38:54    


In article <37202@unix.SRI.COM>, linda@unix.SRI.COM (Linda J. Szkoropad) writes...
>In article <1992Jul23.212926.5182@b15.b15.ingr.com> lynn@b15.b15.ingr.com (Lynn Lee) writes:
>>I have been away from the net for two weeks and come back to find NO Santa Barbar posts.  What's the deal?  This show is really hot right now!  I cannot
>>believe how much everyone complains about DOOL, yet it has more posts than
>>any other!  Come on Santa Barbar fans!  Let's keep up what we started!
>>
>________________________________
> 
>Its like why bother, nobody responds anyway, I've said this many
>times, CAN ANYBODY HEAR ME, ARE YOU DEAF??
> 
>EVERY SINGLE TIME I'VE POSTED NOT ONE PERSON HAS RESPONDED (and I've
>wasted good time thinking of comments)
> 
>Linda Szkoropad




         gee.  excuse us.

         I guess I didn't realize it was required.  

         Sometimes posts seem so complete they seem to need no
         response.

         .sigless E
From: SECBU@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: AMC: Angel's Do (Was Charlie & Pods)
Date: 21 Jul 92 20:33:17 GMT
 <1992Jul15.153812.5968@athena.mit.edu>
 <1992Jul21.162030.16884@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
Distribution: na
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center


I think Ceara's hair dresser has gotten ahold of Angelique.
Is it my TV or did her hair appear red to anyone else??

Her dress was very unbecoming (to put it nicely).
Perhaps Natalies dress consultant had a hand in this
monster too.

Why don't they put Angelique in something a little
more provocative, like Erica??

She also needs heighth in her hair, not have it sawed
down with a buzz cut.   Poor Season.

Well, they shaved dim's face, lets see what we
can get them to do to Angelique:)
Sharon
From: girl@slavery.EBay.Sun.COM (Mary Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Trevor and Nat
Date: 29 Jul 1992 16:12:28 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: slavery.ebay.sun.com


Why is it that now that Nat and Trevor are married
they have made then non exciting??? 
They have been dying to get together for so long
and are hot together in my opinion.  Let these folks
at least go away on a honeymoon before Trevor falls for Galen!

More Nat and Trevor and less A Lot Less
of Erica and boring boring Dimitri!


Mary


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: GAINES@kcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu (Richard Gaines Jr.)
Subject: Re: SB: Where is everybody?
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 13:29:05 GMT


In article <1992Jul27.120002.23348@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>, 22302LMK@MSU writes:

------------------------- Original Article -------------------------
From: linda@unix.SRI.COM (Linda J. Szkoropad)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB: Where is everybody?
Date: 24 Jul 92 21:24:18 GMT
Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park, California

In article <1992Jul23.212926.5182@b15.b15.ingr.com> lynn@b15.b15.ingr.com (Lynn
>I have been away from the net for two weeks and come back to find NO Santa Barb
>believe how much everyone complains about DOOL, yet it has more posts than
>any other!  Come on Santa Barbar fans!  Let's keep up what we started!
>
________________________________

Its like why bother, nobody responds anyway, I've said this many
times, CAN ANYBODY HEAR ME, ARE YOU DEAF??

EVERY SINGLE TIME I'VE POSTED NOT ONE PERSON HAS RESPONDED (and I've
wasted good time thinking of comments)

Linda Szkoropad

So Linda, what comments. Maybe I just overlooked them? I post just about everyd
ay, with my own comments and comments on other posts. However, it seems that SB
is on the way out faster than anyone thought. Advertisers have been told to sto
p buying airtime for Sb.

Lisa

I'm coming out of the woodwork to say that I watch SB!!  I can't believe that
they want to cancel it for a new soap for Deidre Hall or ABC (Another Bell
Creation).

My name is Richard Gaines, Jr. and I like SB!!  I'm not afraid to admit and
you'll be hearing more of me from now on!!

Richard Gaines, Jr.
"Lurking No More"
From: pokey@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Evil Vince [tm])
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL: Summary of Wed. episode (NO SPOILERS)
Date: 23 Jul 92 01:27:33 GMT
Organization: Aggies In Austin


	I can sum up Wednesday's episode in one word:

		Lame.

		Lame lame lame lame lame lame lame.

	(See, it's just one word...I just happened to use it
	 eight times.)

	Oh wait, I thought of another word:

		BLLLEEEAAAAHHHHHHHHH!

TTFN,
- EV

-- 
                Vince Rhee | And the preacher said
  pokey@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu | I pronounce you ninety-nine to life
         Department of ECE | Son, she's no lady, she's your wife
       University of Texas | - Lyle Lovett
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: rick@sadtler.com (Rick Morris)
Subject: Re: DOOL: Hair Forever!
Organization: Sadtler Research Laboratories
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 13:13:18 GMT

In article <1992Jul21.191342.11841@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu>
scduncan@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (Sean C. Duncan, Idiot) writes:
>Dammit....
>
>First people dissin' my man Tanner for having long hair and "looking like a
>woman" now people are getting on JACK's case for having long hair?
>
>As a LongHairedMan (tm) I feel the need to stick up for my brethren and to
>try to enlighten y'all.  Now, lie down, relax and bring yourself into a
>hypnotic trance.  Then, read this:
>
>		Jack and Tanner look fine.  Gosh, I wish more men
>		  in soaps had long hair.
>		Jack and Tanner look fine.  Gosh, I wish more men
>                  in soaps had long hair.
>		Jack and Tanner look fine.  Gosh, I wish more men
>                  in soaps had long hair.
>		Jack and Tanner look fine.  Gosh, I wish more men
>                  in soaps had long hair.
>		Jack and Tanner look fine.  Gosh, I wish more men
>                  in soaps had long hair.
>
>Of course, this will cause your hair follicles to go nuts, depsite your 
>gender and will, of course, make you a person of the nineties, where fashion
>dictates "the longer, the sexier!!"
>

Dude, you are young.  Wait 'till it starts thinning on top.  Then the nice
long mane becomes kinda silly.  But I agree - I think Matt looks better with
longer hair.  Tanner needs longer in back.  It looks like a fruit-bowl cut
right now.  Patch looked RealCool when he first came on!


>Sean C. Duncan
>"BOB Is Our Hope/Jesus is Our BOB/Jesus Is BOB Hope" - Anonymous SubGenius

You ARE nuts.  But that's cool.  After all, we are posting to a group which
favors fruits and nuts.

Ummmm- Peels, Cores, I offer that in the nicest way!  8-)

-Rick.

PS.  Is it Erik, Mad Poet posting some real good smileys?  >8-D  <--Good one!

-- 
Rick Morris                            Email:  rick@sadtler.com
Sadtler Research Labs, Philadelphia   -But I speak for myself
---------------------------------------------------------------
From: tag@drutx.ATT.COM (Theresa G. Quintana)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: ATWT:  Another Lurker
Date: 29 Jul 92 17:45:22 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: AT&T, Denver, CO

Hello Everyone!

I've been watching all of you lurkers speaking up and I felt
guilty for staying quiet so I decided to give this a try.
I've been lurking for a few years and this is the first time
I try to post an article, so I hope it works.  Sorry I'm
not posting on the official Lurkers Night Out, but better late
than never!

My name is Theresa Quintana and I do software system testing
for AT&T Bell Labs. in Denver, CO.  I've been watching ATWT 
since I was in elementary school, I use to watch it with my mom 
when I was small and have been watching it on and off ever since 
(I'm 27 years old now).

I really enjoy reading all the postings and updates (thanks Jeep)
and there have been many a times that I bust out laughing here at
my desk and I'm sure people wonder what's going on.

I'll be waiting to hear from people to see if you get this...

Theresa
tag@druhi.att.com
From: steveh@grafex.cupertino.ca.us (Steve Harding KA6ETB)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: Lurker...
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 17:25:38 PDT
Distribution: usa
Organization: The GRAFex Company

Debbie Goodwin <34IAFWM@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU> writes:

> Although I have posted several different times and have responded to several
> different people, I consider myself a "Lurker...".  I have been watching
> ATWT since about 1977 (?).  Hopefully some of you have been watching longer!
> Ask me any historical question you like.  Come on go ahead!!  I won't be
> able to remember a thing!!  I work at the Central Michigan University
> Library in Mt. Pleasant, Michigan.  I'm sure someone's read of us.

Ah, debs.  Time to consider yourself an inmate.

]...[

> I'm ramblin'!!  Too many drugs.  At any rate...HERE I AM!!!

Come back again, yahear!

> Debbie
> Debbie.....

Hmmm...looking for a nickname, debbie debbie?

steve
From: ahelmers@umiami.ir.miami.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC TAN: Hey I'm new!
Date: 28 Jul 92 22:03:51 EDT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Univ of Miami IR

In article <51010@dime.cs.umass.edu>, corinne@freya.cs.umass.edu (Corinne Roy) writes:
> 
> Hi everyone...
>      This is my first time trying to post so I want to see if
> it works...Could someone let me know if they get this?
> 
> Thanks--
> 
> Cori  "I've finally built up the courage to post" Roy


Hi Cori!  I got your post in sunny Miami...hey, you related to Mike Roy? :)

Ann Helmers
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: gibbsm@ll.mit.edu (MargARET D. Gibbs)
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN: YEARBOOK!!!
Organization: M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 13:43:31 GMT

In article <1992Jul29.033930.16765@cbfsb.cb.att.com> colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (karen colten) writes:
>Hi!  The AMC Yearbook sounds wonderful and I would love to see
>it!  I wasn't able to get involved with it because I also was in
>the middle of packing and getting ready to move.  I had an idea: 
>For the AMCers that couldn't participate, could we borrow a copy,
>make a list of the people who want to see it and then send it
>around, each person paying the postage to the next person on the
>list and the last person sending it back to me and I would in
>turn return it to you?  I would be willing to receive e-mail from
>everyone who wants to see it and assemble the list.  Please let 
>me know.  

Karen,

It's very nice of you to offer to do this!  However, I'd like to
add a few words of warning to anyone who is thinking of lending out
their copy:  

Over a year ago, Granma "CJ" and I started circulating our copies
of a book by Ruth Warrick called "The Confessions of Phoebe Tyler".
We *think* we know who has them now, but can't be sure, because
those people have never emailed us to let us know whether they
passed on the book to someone else (they were the last people on
our list of folks to mail it to).  Anyhow, the fact remains:  neither
Granma nor I ever got our copies of the book returned to us.  If you
are willing to risk never getting your yearbook back, by all means
go ahead and lend it out.  But remember that the yearbook, unlike
"Confessions", is a limited edition.  It might be better to make a
B&W copy to lend out, or to have anyone interested in having their
own B&W copy email me, and I will sell you one for only $6.  Since
almost $3 of that will be spent for postage, and you get to *keep*
the copy without feeling guilty about not returning it, I think that's 
a pretty good deal!  

Sorry to those who think I'm writing too emphatically about this.  It
is definitely *not* a flame against Karen!  I'm afraid that not getting
my book back has made me a cynic.  :-( And Karen, I still think it's awfully 
nice of you to offer to gather the names and make a list of people to 
circulate a yearbook to!  

Mary Allison, you've been involved with a circulating yearbook, haven't
you?  What have your experiences been?


-- 
Margaret D. Gibbs		"Practice random kindness and 
Assistant Staff			 senseless acts of beauty"
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
gibbsm@ll.mit.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jdale@nsfuvax (JANE)
Subject: Re: AMC: ATTN: AMC WRITERS!!!!!!
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Mathematics Computer Network, University of Oklahoma
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 03:49:00 GMT

In article <1992Jul23.171012.2745@reed.edu>, terra@reed.edu (Clippers in '93!!!) writes...
>In article <9207231643.AA02647@hqsun1.us.oracle.com> tech@us.oracle.com (tech, tchin) writes:
>>
>>NO...NO...NO...BAD WRITERS!!!!!!
>>
>>LEAVE Livia and Tom alone....I am so TIRED of seeing a couple finally find
>>love and happiness....then throw in a hand grenade to liven it up.....
> 
>gotta disagree, I thought the moment between Livian and Lucas was PURE
>SOAP CHEMISTRY, or at least as they can come lately on AMC.  If ever a couple
>was meant to HIT IT, it was those two.  Man, she was doing some good acting
>the past vouple of days, by the way, and Lucas isn't so bad himself.  How else
>are we gonna have some supreme fights with Liv and Viv?  
> 
>I'm sorry, but I think it's about time to send Tom off to visit Ceara in
>london.  He is about the most useless character ever to appear on AMC.  I've
>never liked him, probably BECAUSE of how lame he is with women, and I hate
>the self-righteous AA bit, but really, why do they keep him around? He seems
                  ^^^^^^^^^
       ***Maybe get things livened up with Tom going off the wagon and
          making life hell for Livia, Lucas, and everyone else in general.
          We haven't had a good "problem child"  in a while.  He could really
          stir things up with all his ex-wives.  Cause Brooke to want to take
          care of him and put a hitch in her new relationship with Edmund, etc.
           No one is perfect.  Esp. Tom. ***
                  j.


>like a perfect match for Galen, though, come to think of it, she's completely
>uninteresting as well, and seems to be a damsel in distress just waiting for
>a Tom/Jeremy type to protect her...
> 
>>Yes...lucas  is cute...but give him Natalie or Dixie....or create a story
>>line where An Li falls in love with Lucas and has a moment of weakness....
>>throw the hand grenade into a Lucas/Anli/Terrance storyline....
> 
>The only other woman I'd like to see Lucas get it on with would be Dixie or
>if she got her old personality back, Gloria.  He seems like he could be really
>intense with the right woman, but I still insist that Livia IS right, and she
>has a lot of potential for exciting acting in her and it's all totally wasted
>on the BOGUS relationship with Tom...her best comes out around Lucas.
> 
>Terra
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: fbrown@ssd.kodak.com (Frank Brown)
Subject: Re: AMC: Just what time IS it? (SPOILERS)
Keywords: huh? when? who?
Organization: Eastman Kodak
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 19:50:46 GMT

In article <BrwIuD.54q@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jang8728@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (J.A.Novotny-Dura ) writes:
>pamela@keps.kodak.com (Pamela Blalock) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Jul23.022942.2095@cbnewsc.cb.att.com> dwv@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (Dave Vollman) writes:
>
>>Obviously Edmund's writer and Dimitri's writer don't speak to 
>>each other and probably have the same dislike that Eddie and Dim 
>>have for each other.
>
>>Does anyone at AMC actually watch the show??? I think not!
>
>  
>   Maybe Dim was playing hot shot and trying to get through just
>   one scene without leaning on his ever faithful cue cards, hence
>   screwing the days up.  Did anyone else notice the way Dim pounced on
>   his cue card Wed ...  It was after the party and Angelique and Dim
>   (and someone else...?) were in the Weirdwind front room and Angelique
>   said something about how he managed to escape the party for quite
>   awhile, then he sort of laughed and lunged past her for the cue card,
>   nearly trampling her on the way.  He completely read the next couple
>   lines right from the card.   Did anyone else see this?  
>
>       Jan
> 
Yes but the biggest blunder I ever saw them make was include the cameraman in
a scene. It was a long time ago and I cant remember who Phoebe was talking to but
she was sitting on a bed talking to someone and when they switched angles there
was the cameraman. You could see this guy standing there next to her holding a
camera until they switched back. Does anyone else remember this?

Frank
>
From: v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Michelle L. Zafron)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: AMC: Charlie--which Kennedy is he the son of?
Date: 23 Jul 92 17:45:00 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Okay, the new Charlie (who incidentally, I rather like) is the son of the late
Peter Lawford and which Kennedy sister?  I think it's the eldest sister, but
I can't remember her name.

Once I got used to the Kennedy teeth blinding me, he's pretty decent.

--Michelle L. Zafron (v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Suppose that you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress.  But
 I repeat myself."
                                 --Mark Twain   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps