From: chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: The fundamental question of abortion
Date: 29 Sep 92 16:15:38 GMT
Organization: California State University Sacramento

In article <nyikos.717270316@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
>
>In <19kokoINNgaq@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@sdd.hp.com (Doofus) writes:
>
>>In article <nyikos.716937764@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
>
>
>The Lady High Executioner And Lady High Everything Else of talk.abortion
>deigns to intercede in the case of Chris Lyman, a.k.a. Tweedledee, and
>Larry Margolis, a.k.a. Tweedledum.
>
>[Lest my use of "Lady" be misconstrued as indicative of sexism or misogyny,
>let me explain exactly which meaning of the word I am using, in
>metaphorical fashion, of course.

Yes, it is misogynist. :)

It insults other real ladies. Like Suzanne. I think the description of
Adrienne would be Manhateus, Hey You, Doofus, #$%!, and if she attempts a
flamewar with me, Sharkbait, or Lunchmeat.


>>I swear, you clueless twits who don't know how to use (-:s just kill me.
>>Put it in your .signature if you simply cannot remember when to use it.
>
>>("What's a .signature?")

Those 10,000 different men's names that are scribbled over various parts of
her body, perhaps? (Hooboy, this is really foul play. I wonder who'll blow
the whistle?)


>>>A few more such posts, and you go into my de facto killfile.
>
>>Please, Peter, do.  We'll be thrilled, and less bothered.
>
>>Adrienne Regard
>
>I dunno...It appears to me that Lady Regard's attempts to dictate the
>use of (-:s and .signatures might come under the rubric of "anti-choice".

Oh, no, when the pro-aborts do it, it's a-okay. Didn't you read the
rulebook: Whatever the pro-aborts do, is okay, but when we do it, it's
anti-choice.

You just don't know the law, Pete. :)


>In <17u2upINN81@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
>
>>(someone else responding to Peter)
>>>>What ARE you going on about?  How many women decide at the last moment
>>>>that they have changed their mind and are forcibly held to the table
>>>>while the doctor performs the abortion?
>
>>I wonder how many women are forcibly held to the table while the doctor
>>performs a live delivery, too.  After all, I've been there.  I've heard
>>women yelling at the doctors, telling them to stop.....
>
>I'm calling your bluff.  What would these women have done if the doctor
>had stopped?

The baby would have turned out like Adrienne Regard?


>Were you one of these women?  If so, what would YOU
>have done if the doctor had called your bluff?

DON'T ask, Pete. Heaven knows what screwed up stuff goes on in Adrienne's
life. As much as she hates men (like how she refers to men as "white man"
kinda like PatricKKK Harumphrey refered to me as "fat black ass" - see
upcoming post), I can't see how she could ever get pregnant. She probably
looks like a man, so no rapist would be interested in her...


>[End of Sept.2 post;
>this was along the "Re: Nyikos Goes Under (WAS Re: THIRD TRIMESTER
>ABORTIONS) thread.]
>
>I would like to take this opportunity to express a desire for an end to
>all Adrienne-is-drieux speculation.  I never actually took seriously the
>possibility that Adrienne is fictitious and drieux is real, my only
>inclinations were in the opposite direction.  [Women have sometimes used
>male pen names; a famous example from the 19th century was George Eliot
>as a *nom de guerre* for Mary Ann Evans.]  It seemed at least plausible
>that Adrienne would publish her more random and disconnected thoughts
>under an assumed name.

I concur.


>But I think this line of speculation is
>unprofitable, and the only reason I brought it up in the first place
>was that I wasn't quite sure how to respond directly to Adrienne's
>implication that I'd crossed her off the list of "compassionate" people.
>Now that I've responded to it indirectly in a follow-up to Patrick H.
>on the same "Peter, do you even know how to READ?" thread.

Well, yeah, it is unprofitable to play the "Joe is actually Jack" game. But
hey, at least *you* drop it when it isn't funny anymore - these Dennis Hall
pranksters are continuing on with their prank on me (and it's gotta be one
of their pranks if it's going on THIS long).


=============================================================================
-----Steve Chaney: Founder, Borg Operating Space Systems, Revision 2.0-------
	           The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS.