HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 20:39 EDT
From: fmsys!macy@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu (Macy Hallock)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: A Very Strange Experience When Calling LD
Organization: The Matrix
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 597, Message 8 of 10

In article <telecom12.588.2@eecs.nwu.edu>:

> I was playing with my touchtone phone in the 1 415 621 prefix...
> [ended up hearing] I'd say, 2^3 to 2^5 conversations going on at once! 
> What was I hearing?

Sounds to me like you got John (Mr. Conference Bridge) Higdon's home
phone ...


Macy M Hallock Jr N8OBG 216.725.4764 macy@fmsystm.uucp macy@fmsystm.ncoast.org
[No disclaimer, but I have no real idea what I'm saying or why I'm telling you]
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 92 07:16:22 EDT
From: dwn@dwn.ccd.bnl.gov (Dave Niebuhr)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: 911 Run-Around
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 578, Message 12 of 15

In TELECOM Digest Volume 12 : Issue 571 Carl Moore (VLD/VMB)
<cmoore@BRL.MIL> writes:

> Some phone books do list non-emergency numbers, and I take them to be
> for matters which should get police attention but are not as urgent.

The problem with my PD (Suffolk County, NY) is that if I wanted to
make a non-emergency call but yet talk to a policeman/woman, I would
be told to call 911 in about 90% of the instances.

An example happened to me last year.  I was rummaging through a closet
and came across an old Army style ammo box with live ammunition in it
left over from the days when I went hunting.  I called the precinct,
was told to call 911 who told me to call the Emergency Services unit,
who told me to call the precinct.

I ended up going to the precinct and dropping the stuff off there.


Dave Niebuhr      Internet: niebuhr@bnl.gov / Bitnet: niebuhr@bnl
Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973  (516)-282-3093


[Moderator's Note: The Chicago Police are notorious in this way. I
have always understood 911 was to be used ONLY in cases of dire
emergency when police or fire fighter intervention was needed
immediatly. Don't report stolen cars or burglarized homes to 911; the
danger is long past. Use 911 when a police officer is requested right
now to stop a crime in progress ... period. All other calls should go
to the district station. And that is the way the CPD officially tells
us to do it. But you call the district station to report something
which is going on (not an emergency) or something which happened, and
you get told to 'call 911 to report it'. Once every few months or so
911 officials complain about how overloaded the system is, and why
they are sometimes unable to answer for six rings ... I wish our
police department would settle this once and for all, and make an
official policy that everyone had to stick to.   PAT]
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 17:28:31 EDT
From: andrew m. boardman <amb@cs.columbia.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Standards, Standards, Who's Got the Standard?
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 581, Message 11 of 12

I need to wire a bunch RJ-14 boxes for new service here at Columbia,
and have run into an interesting problem.  The NTI people (it's an SL1
coming in) insist that, for the secondary pair, yellow is ring and
black is tip.  A rather fuzzy memory on my part says that it's the
other way around (black is tip, and yellow is ring), and my
"Subscriber Loop Signalling and Transmission Handbook" also agrees
with me.  The possibilities I can see ...

* The NTI rep is plain wrong.
* The "standard" differs from industry practice.
* The book is wrong.  (In several places, no less!)

I'm interested not only what's common practice, but in any popular
devices that don't conform to it.  (i.e., splitters, two line phones
(If there are any that are actually polatiry sensetive!), et
cetera...)  Many of the phones will be old 2500 sets, so polarity
*will* matter ...

Thanks for any clues!


andrew    amb@cs.columbia.edu
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 15:16:00 -0600
From: bill.garfield@yob.sccsi.com (Bill Garfield)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Mitel SX-20 Switch
Reply-To: bill.garfield@yob.sccsi.com (Bill Garfield)
Organization: Ye Olde Bailey BBS - Houston, TX - 713-520-1569
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 595, Message 12 of 14

> Does anyone out there have any experience with the MITEL SX-20 switch,
> and if so, can you be persuaded to comment on this problem? I really
> need that remote display, since it is how I program the system. Some
> upcoming changes will force me to need programmability.

I think a call to DEAN TECHNOLOGIES at 1-800-545-9754 will result in a
smile on your face.  (303-693-6189)

Dean Technologies is a second source MITEL repair facility located in
Englewood, Colorado.  According to their 1992 price sheet, the cost to
repair your Remote Call Status Display is but a paltry $69.00!

They also SELL most parts for the SX-20 as well as the SX-10, SX-5,
SX-50, SX100/200/200 digital, and SX2000 at reasonable prices.

I'm an SX-2000 man myself and have no experience with the SX-20.  I
have a network of (currently) eight SX2000's, comprised of five "SG"s
and three "S"s with six of those machines here in Houston.  Two of the
three-cabinet "SG"s stand side-by-side across the room from me right
now.

I began using Dean Technologies on the recommendation of a fellow
classmate I met three years ago in Mitel school down in Boca Raton, FL
(before they closed it up).  I was getting frustrated by what I
considered to be shoddy repairs of my E&M trunk cards, high repair
costs, poor repair warranty and full charge for a repair when no
trouble was found!  When I'd send Supersets in for repairs, MITEL
would fix 'em but send 'em back still dirty with frayed cords, etc.
When I complained, I was told that "refurbishment costs extra."

At Dean Technologies, instrument repair is not only less expensive,
but INCLUDES refurbishment.  Circuit boards come back within 10-14
CALENDAR days FIXED, upgraded to latest firmware revisions, and with a
full two-year warranty on ALL repairs.  They also do not charge for
"no trouble found" repairs, just return shipping.

I've been very pleased, and think you might be too.

 ... and just on the chance that someone from MITEL is reading this,
let me say that I'm most pleased with every piece of my MITEL
equipment.  However, IMHO, their Ogdensburg repair facility could sure
take some lessons from the folks at Dean Technologies.


Bill Garfield <bill.garfield@yob.sccsi.com>| Standard Disclaimer Applies.
PBX/Communications Specialist              | Opinions are my own.  I
Panhandle Eastern Corporation              | speak for no one.
Corporate Hdqs - Houston, TX  Voice 713.627.5228    FAX 713.627.5285
From: jim@n5ial.chi.il.us (Jim Graham)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Amateur Radio and Our Moderator
Date: 29 Jul 92 02:19:25 GMT
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 591, Message 2 of 10

Interesting, how our Moderator changes his tune when suddenly faced
with the fact that he shoved his foot in his mouth (err, keyboard).

Here's what he originally said:

> [Moderator's Note: Well Cliff, the Internet community had a lot of
> trust between people for many years until the BBS'er/malicious hacker
> type person found out about it and began abusing the trust. It reminds
> me of how ham radio *used* to be until the CB'ers started moving in.  PAT]

and after probably getting a flood of replies/flames, thanks to the
ongoing discussion he indirectly caused in rec.radio.amateur.misc, he
tries to point out how badly people read what he wrote, and what he
REALLY said in his previous post:

> [Moderator's Note: Your message really amazes me. You must have read
> it as well as you read my name in each issue ...

[lots of attempting to backtrack and make everyone else look bad deleted]

> NOW do you understand?  Geeze, of all the letters I get ... :( PAT]

But you must see that what you originally wrote does not match what
you're saying here. You made a blanket statement to the effect that
Amateur Radio is no longer a good thing and that the CBers have ruined
it.  You didn't say they've messed up some portions of some of the
phone segments of the ham bands ... you said they've hosed up Amateur
Radio, period.

Get your facts straight, Pat, and don't make such blind, blanket
statements.  Otherwise, don't complain when you get a flood of flames
about it --- you deserve them, IMHO.

Any bets on whether or not this gets posted?  :-)


73 DE N5IAL (/9)
INTERNET: jim@n5ial.chi.il.us | grahj@gagme.chi.il.us | j.graham@ieee.org
UUCP:  gagme!n5ial!jim@clout.chi.il.us
AMATEUR RADIO: n5ial@n9hsi (Chicago.IL.US.Earth)


[Moderator's Note: Why shouldn't your note get posted? I try not to
operate like my competitor Kay Graham with her two rags {The
Washington Post} and {News Weak}. You'll never see anything in her
publications she finds disagreeable. I only quit posting at 3 AM on
Monday after putting out ten issues over the weekend and falling
asleep at the keyboard. And why should I bother getting my facts
straight? Neither Kay nor Arthur O. Sulzberg feel that is a major
consideration, and look how much more they charge than I do. The
'flood of flames' I got consisted of three letters; yours and Paul's,
and he wrote twice.   PAT]
From: shri@iucaa.ernet.in (H. Shrikumar)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Is Not 100% SS7 Needed For 1-800 and the Like?
Date: 27 Jul 92 22:48:02 GMT
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 589, Message 2 of 15

Hi,

In article <telecom12.576.1@eecs.nwu.edu>, john@zygot.ati.com (John
Higdon) writes:

>> Regarding SS7 links, he said GTE was working on them between their own
>> switches.  Links to PacBell would come, but he didn't know when.

  Please correct me, if I am wrong ... no scratch that, reading the
above, it *does* seem that I *am* wrong ...

  I was under the impression that 1-800 like services could not be
implemented really well without the something like SS7. Are we reading
in the above that there is not yet 100% SS7 interconnects in the US.

  IS it that 1-800, ANI and caller-ID are being done by someother
means (I'd have to do some learning here then.) or is it that the LD
carrier do use SS7, and only that some local links are not yet ?


shrikumar ( shri@iucaa.ernet.in )
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1992 18:19:55 -0300
From: gauthier@ug.cs.dal.ca (Paul Gauthier)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Help With X.25; Help With UK 
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 578, Message 8 of 15

Two related questions for you telecomers in the know ...

I am looking for a good book or electronic document on X.25 from the
point of view of a programmer going to write code to conduct
transactions over it.  Also, references to a good IBM PC based X.25
interface for dialup use are needed.

Second, this X.25 connection I am exploring is to be placed in the UK.
Some of the terms they use are not immediately obvious to me, so I am
wondering if anyone has useful comments on them. One was a service
called Mercury 5000UK which sounds to me like a packet switching
network. Is there a way in from Canada/USA/North America? The other
phrase he used was kilostream as a method of connection. Anyone??


Thanks,

Paul Gauthier / gauthier@ug.cs.dal.ca
Phone: (902)462-8217    Fax: (902)420-1675
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 92 10:27:14 +0900
From: Mitsutaka Ito <ito@nttslb.ntt.jp>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: CDMA Technology and Multi-Media
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 577, Message 9 of 13

Dear Sirs,

   I am interested in application of CDMA technology to radio
multi-media communication.

   If anyone have any information on this topic, please inform me.

   Thank you in advance.


Mitsutaka Ito                E-mail: ito@nttslb.ntt.jp
NTT Software Laboratories    Tel/Fax: +81-3-3740-5715/+81-3-3740-5740
1-9-1 Kohnan Minato-ku Tokyo 108 Japan
Date: 29 Jul 92 14:39:32 GMT
From: Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl (Jack Jansen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Connecting a Workstation to a Phoneline
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 596, Message 4 of 13

About six weeks ago I asked for schematics or products that would
allow me to connect the audio in/out of a workstation to a phone line.

Most people answered that what I want is a "DAA box". Unfortunately,
the Dutch PTT was pretty sure that such a device was never presented
to them for registration, and US registered devices are not
automatically allowed in Holland. So, this was no solution to me.

Here are two firms in the US that manufacture such devices, anyway:

	Suncoast Systems, Pensacola, Fl. 904-478-6477
	Cermatek, Sunnyvale, 408-752-5000

Another tip I got was to look at Ciarcia's columns in old (81-85)
issues of {Byte} or at the 1991 issue of the ARRL handbook.

Finally, I got a circuit diagram from somone, but it came by fax. So,
I am not able to reproduce it here. If someone is very interested,
however, I can fax it to them.

Thanks to all the people who responded,


Jack Jansen      Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl   uunet!cwi.nl!jack 
G=Jack;S=Jansen;O=cwi;PRMD=surf;ADMD=400net;C=nl
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 19:03:15 GMT
From: stevef@wrq.com (Steve Forrette)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: FCC Modem Tax Rumor on Compu$erve
Organization: Walker Richer & Quinn, Inc., Seattle, WA
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 580, Message 8 of 11

If you read the original CompuServe message carefully, you see that
all they are really saying is something that has been mentioned in
TELECOM Digest several times in the past: that the data carriers will
not be imposed on by the "access fees" that voice carriers must pay
(the "modem tax") as long as they continue to use current access
methods and facilities.  If they want to upgrade their type of
connection into the LEC network, then they must pay the higher rate.
Whether this is fair or not, it's not really news.  It seems that
CompuServe wants to use the newer services, but not pay the higher
rates that would result, and is stirring up the "modem tax" issue to
put public pressure to change this.


Steve Forrette, stevef@wrq.com
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 00:36:43 EDT
From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@BRL.MIL>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Region CG1 in British Columbia
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 587, Message 9 of 11

 From a call to British Columbia: "The number you have reached is not
in service.  This is a recording from region CG1."  The number I
called was apparently a Vancouver prefix.
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1992 17:11:15 GMT
From: irving@happy-man.com (Irving_Wolfe)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Panasonic 12/32 - Any Experiences?  Any Advice?
Reply-To: Irving_Wolfe@happy-man.com
Organization: Happy Man Corp., Vashon Island, WA 98070-7399
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 577, Message 12 of 13

We've had a Panasonic 12/32 phone system here for about three years
and it is starting to fail.

Incoming DISA callers have not been able to get back out on another
line for some time, but we could live with that.

Now, unfortunately, we're having intermittent problems with general
incoming calls through DISA.  Most of the time, it still works.  But
sometimes, callers don't get the outgoing voice message.  Other times,
the system won't respond to their attempts to tone-dial an extension.
Still other times, it won't automatically transfer to operator if they
fail to dial an extension.

We're running six lines and about 26 extensions, over half of which
are standard two-wire phones or devices.  The only other thing I know
of that's wrong with the system is that one or two of the extension
jacks don't work properly, but that was no problem since we still have
more than we are using.

What's the best thing to do?  Shall I invest in another DISA card for
over $500?  Is the system really badly designed, so I should avoid
throwing good money after bad and replace it with something more
robust (and if so, what)?


Thanks!

Irving_Wolfe@Happy-Man.com      Happy Man Corp. 206/463-9399 x101
4410 SW Pt. Robinson Rd., Vashon Island, WA  98070-7399  fax x108
From: /PN=Thomas.K.Hinders/OU=CCMAIL/O=CHAN.IS/PRMD=MMC/ADMD=TELEMAIL/C=US/@sprint.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Desktop Videoconferencing on the Internet
Date: 27 Jul 92 20:46:10 GMT
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 589, Message 5 of 15

I heard that the Internet tested voice and video to the desktop over
the net using Suns.  Does anyone have any further details.  If enough
responses come back I'll summarize and post.


Thomas K Hinders   Martin Marietta Computing Standards
4795 Meadow Wood Lane       Chantilly, VA 22021
703.802.5593 (v) 703.802.5027 (f)


[Moderator's Note: I have a lengthy message in the queue about this
now and will try to get it out yet tonight. It is a long message.  PAT]
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 00:44:00 EDT
From: Paul.Knupke.Jr.@f750.n3603.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Paul Knupke Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: CID on Campus
Organization: FidoNet node 1:3603/750 - FTC Mail System, Largo Fl
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 595, Message 13 of 14

On 25 Jul 92 05:50, Marshal "Airborne" Perlman wrote:

> This fall I am moving from California to Florida to attend college
> at the Florida Institute of Technology and I understand Florida
> has CID. Now comes the complex part. FIT has all their phones
> running off a PBX of sorts (don't quote me on this) but they are
> not regular 'dial out phones'. {i.e. if you dial a number without
> '9', its gonna be to another extention, just like a hotel}.

As a former student of Florida Tech I'll attempt to answer this one.

Some background on the Florida Tech phone system ...

FIT has all on campus phones, including student housing on a PBX.  The
number is 1-407-768-8000.  When you dial it you will be greated with
the message: "Thank you for calling the Florida Institute of
Technology, if you are calling from a touch tone phone please enter
the exchange you wish to dial, otherwise please wait for assistance."
Students are not charged for local service which includes the Cocoa,
Cocoa Beach, Eau Gallie, Melbourne and Sebastian exchanges.

All extensions are four digits, and all housing are in the range
8200-8600.

In the spring of 90, they began offering a package of call waiting,
three way calling and call forward (on campus only.)

There is also voice mail for each extension.  Very primative, but
workable.

Long distance service is limited to FIT's outbound WATS.  You cannot
select your own LD carrier.  The provided carrier pricing is fair at
best.  If I had returned for a second year I would have lived off
campus, I couldn't stand the phone system.

Simply put ... the phone system royally stinks IMHO.

> HOW does CID work in this enviroment?

As far as I know, Southern Bell does not offer CID in the Melbourne
area yet.


Internet: Paul.Knupke.Jr.@f750.n3603.z1.FIDONET.ORG
UUCP: ...!myrddin!tct!psycho!750!Paul.Knupke.Jr.
From: Steve_Grant@kcbbs.gen.nz (Steve Grant)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Traces and Scramblers
Date: 27 Jul 92 21:04:03 GMT
Organization: Kappa Crucis Unix BBS, Auckland, New Zealand
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 589, Message 15 of 15

Does anyone have plans for either of these items or information on how
to do it, particularly the scrambler?  Also is it possible to trace
calls from home, not the exchange?


Thanks, 

Steve
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 92 23:54:20 PDT
From: system@coldbox.cojones.com (Bryan Lockwood)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Mitel SX-20 Switch
Organization: The Generation Gap
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 587, Message 3 of 11

I do the maintenance for a small school located in northern Alaska. I
don't know a lot about telephony, but where I live, we can't bring in
experts, so I learn what I need to to fix problems as they occur. And
hopefully avoid more later.

We have a small MITEL SX-20 switch (PBX? I don't know the proper
terminology) which services our 20 or so extensions. MITEL no longer
sells this equipment or makes replacement parts for it, and it's a
real bear to get ahold of a real human at MITEL- they have a voice
mail system that has to be heard to be beleived. I still see red.

Anyhow, the remote operator display is on the fritz. This is a small
display unit, approximately 8" x 8" x 1.5", with red LEDs to show
number dialed, extension status, etc. It is meant to be located at the
prime extension.

I followed the troubleshooting instructions in the MITEL book, and the
display unit appeared to be dead. So I ordered another one. MITEL said
they would have to wait until someone sold them one or traded one in
on a new system, refurbish it, and send it to me. Eight months and
$200 (not to mention probably another $100 spent on long-distance hold
or bouncing around in that voicemail system) later, I now have the new
display unit and it appears to be as dead as the first one. It does
sport a "refurbished and tested" sticker.

I suspect the motherboard is bad ... possibly the place where the
remote display plugs in. Yet I am loathe to go through the long
process of obtaining yet another part from MITEL.

Does anyone out there have any experience with the MITEL SX-20 switch,
and if so, can you be persuaded to comment on this problem? I really
need that remote display, since it is how I program the system. Some
upcoming changes will force me to need programmability.

Thanks for listening!


Author: Bryan Lockwood (system@coldbox.cojones.com)
Coldbox=  Usenet: system@coldbox.cojones.com | WWIVnet: system@501
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 12:16:00 -0400
From: msb@sq.com (Mark Brader)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Telephone Keypad Question
Organization: TELECOM Digest
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 583, Message 11 of 15

> But the 1976 Philadelphia directory was still using exchange names.
> As in the Wilmington case, these were the two letter + five number
> type; the cases (cited in the Digest) of three letters and four
> numbers are too far back for me to remember.

While I've never investigated it systematically, my impression from
the places where I've seen old numbers is that here in Toronto we
never had three letters and four digits (3L+4D).  Instead, it appears
that we went from 2L + 4D to 2L + 5D.  (And later to 7D, of course.)


Mark Brader, SoftQuad Inc., Toronto, utzoo!sq!msb, msb@sq.com

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: pjh@mccc.edu (P. J. Holsberg)
Subject: WorldBlazers and SLIP
Organization: The College on the Other Side of U. S. 1
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 02:11:55 GMT

I haven't been able to read this group for over a week and I get the
impression that this question may have been asked and answered during
that time, but....

What are the proper S-register settings for a WorldBlazer to connect via
SLIP using KA9Q?

Thanks.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems