HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Christ on a flagpole, athiests suck!
Date: 20 Nov 92 14:28:15 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b64746.student.cwru.edu

In article <960@dsbc.icl.co.uk> kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
>Bungee jumping Christ on a bridge, you can't expect the President to lie ALL
>of the time, he has to have a break every once in a while.  As to your
>reference to Hitler there, if Hitler had got up in Germany before he got into
>power and made just those remarks, he probably wouldn't have got into power.
>My point is that if people make their position on certain issues clear, the
>voters can decide if those people are arsewipes or not.

	My, my, my. Kevin, do you not know the slightest bit of history 
behind Nazi Germany? He wrote _Mein Kampf_ well before he was elected to 
office. His hatred of the Jews were well known. He built his power using his 
remarks, and using and harnessing the anger of the German people. 
	Perot made it perfectly clear that he favored door to door, Big 
Brother searches of all homes in the lesser neighborhoods. Yet, many still 
voted for him. 
	Bush made it perfectly clear that he had no intention of supporting 
civil liberties, nor the proliferation of democracy/republics. Yet, many 
still voted for him.
	etc...

>Well, same here but you get the idea.

	Whether or not, I "get the idea", does not excuse making fallacious 
statements.

>Another point to get you wound up into an even greater frenzy.  
>Your constitution, I beleive, calls for religious equality, what religion do
>athiests have? and what makes them think that they deserve equality
>under the US constitution?

	That is a strawman arugement, solely depending on whether or not 
you want to call athiesm a religion. Hence, it is a semetic arguement, not a 
constitutional one.
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 20 Nov 92 18:39:02 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

bondc@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Clay M. Bond) writes:
: In article <1992Nov18.032129.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
: 
: >I suspect you swallow quite well
: 
: Explain this remark.
: 
: -- 
: "There is no gate, no lock, no bolt that you can set upon
:  the freedom of my mind."
: 			   -- Virginia Woolf


The Phascist Phantom is making gratuitous and offensive "fag"
references.  Best to ignore him; he's a silly little ghost, and
will probably go away if he doesn't get the attention he so
desparately craves.

Bill
From: kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Hands across the waters [Was Re: Shut the fuck up]
Keywords: Bollocks, fuck, arsehole, cunt, plonker, shit-for-brains.
Date: 16 Nov 92 13:55:11 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited

In article <BxnB2u.ICr@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Some lame bastard) writes:
>
> >Well, if that's your idea of a snappy one liner then you should try a little
> >harder.  See me after school arsehole.
> 
>   What time does nursery school let you out?
> 
Did you think that up all on your own?  That's very good considering you've
got your head up your arse.

> 
>   Perhaps we should form a monarchy.  Then, we too could have a bunch of 
>   inbred, incestuous half-wits to entertain us by splashing their fat
>   white butts in bikinis across the tabloids.  That island inbreeding
>   is really showing in their horsey, bucktoothed, beady eyed appearances
>   and this illiterate garbage posting of yours.
> 
Perhaps you should, fuckface, then you would really have somthing to moan
about.  Do you really think we like having a monarchy?  We we do, fuckface.
Why don't you learn to speak the Queen's English proppa, like wot I does?

> 
>    Really, it *could* be worse.  He could live over there in YOUR 
>    stinking cesspool of a decaying country.  Or do you _have_ to be a pasty,
>    dim-witted, coarse piece of scum with skin lesions like yourself to 
>    qualify for citizenship in the UK?
> 
No, but it helps.  Is it just because you're American or do you have
some other use for being a half-wit shit-for-brains mother fucker?

> 
>   We should be more choosey about our allies.  Bugger off, loser.
> 
Allies?  fuck you geek.  The fuckers in the US planes paniced and blew up
a bunch of British guys on the ground.  I think WE should find other allies
or just come round and shoot at your arses for a change, fucking commie
bastard.

Seeya!  |/    \    /
        |\evin \/\/ALSH  -  kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 13:26:19 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.

weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
> 	All right, issue one- did George Bush say that atheists should not
> be U.S. citizens- the answer is no- What George Bush did say is that he is
> not sure- for those deficient in the Logic area, A statement that X is true
> is not the same as a statement that it is unknown if X is true.

Shit, what does it take to get him to be sure?  Four years later people are
still writing him letters asking for an apology, and he's still replying that
he stands by his original comments.  Doesn't sound very fucking unsure to me.

I can't believe that nobody's shown him a copy of the Constitution, so I
suppose it comes down to the fact that George is unsure whether he should
uphold the Constitution or not.


mathew
-- 
"Boy, they were big on crematoriums weren't they?"
 -- George Bush, during a tour of Auschwitz, 1987-09-28

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jallen@bgsu.edu (Leah Scholl (((()))))
Subject: Re: Texan prick
Organization: Bowling Green State Univ.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 22:18:51 GMT

Raggedy Andy writes:
>>    [ nothing I am capable of responding to ]
>Can't you even think up your own insults?  Must you plagiarize your hero
>Troll for material?  I'll be happy to pick on you if you give me something
>worth flaming.

     Osh, Osh, Osh.  Suck my dick.  Urp.  Gaaa...
     Can't you think up *any* insults?

>*yawn*  Why I'm Raggedy Andy, that's who...  and I didn't say you couldn't use
>those new words you learned today, just that it's the most boring, lame,
>cop-out form of flaming there is.  Any junior high punk can do this. 
>Your post attests to this fact.

     MMph!  Hah!  BlahBlah MUMUMUMUM!  And FUCK YOU!

>BUT, since you like dirty words and I happen to have an extensive 
>vocabulary of them, I'll reply to you JUST THIS ONCE with language you
>can understand, OK?  In the future, you'll have to be more creative.

   What did you say?  BingaBingaBinga -- plop.

>AND JUST WHO THE FUCKING, COCK-SLIMING HELL ARE *YOU*, SHE-MAN?  IF SPOUTING
>OBSCENITIES LIKE THESE ARE THE BEST YOU CAN DO, YOU MORONIC, PRE-PUBESCENT,
>WORTHLESS, DUNG BEETLE, THEN CARRY YOUR PIMPLY, HEMMORHOIDIC, CHICKEN-SHIT
>ASS OFF TO ALT.SCHOOLYARD.TRASH.  INSTEAD OF BORING ME WITH THIS TRIPE WHY
>DON'T YOU GO STICK YOUR FECUND NOSE INTO SOMEBODY ELSE'S LIFE, YOU 
>HERMAPHRODITIC, PUSS-SUCKING, PENCIL NECKED GEEK?  NOW RUN ALONG BACK TO 
>YOUR MOTHER AND SUCK HER OOZING, DISEASED PAPS FOR COMFORT, YOU OBNOXIOUS
>LITTLE FART-VAPOR!

   I'm raggedy Leah, that's who.  And I'm not on Opie any more.  HAHAHA!
   Fuck you!  How does it feel, raggedy Andy?  Do you like it more than 
   Opie did?

--Leah Scholl
From: jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: To shitCANada and the Kanucks.
Date: 18 Nov 92 15:50:25 GMT
Organization: University of Scranton


	This is just a little reply to the fucking Canadian Kanuck who was
badmouthing the Constitution as a lovely piece of vellum and not a working
government like Canada's *ha ha ha*

Well Kanuck, at least my country isn't so dependent on foreign investment like
your leech nation.  I'd hate to see what all of you Kanucks will be doing if GM
goes out of business, since half of Canada is employed by the U.S. auto
industry.  Perhaps you could cut down all of your forests and save our spotted
owl or become the Western hemisphere's biggest ice peddlers.

				Troll of America
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: about your votes . . .
From: SOCC9241430E@LUST.LATROBE.EDU.AU (Chris)
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 03:25:30 GMT
Organization: La Trobe University
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

In <1992Nov12.165309.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:

> 
> 	It saddens me to see that not a single person in this group can cast an
> impartial vote.  That reduces this whole poll to a mere popularity contest.
> So, after fucking over about 10 of you regular lameflames who think your so
> tough, I did expect the results I'm seeing- that is, I didn't expect to be too
> popular.  No matter, in your hearts and in mine we will both always know I was
> the winner and when the poll is said and done, I'll go on kicking your asses,
> business as usual.

Well you parasitic moron, I think that you have been the dweeb getting the
arse-whipping.  When it comes to "lameflames", you are the the lamest fuck in
this whole group!  On must concede that great pleasure is derived from your
appalling posts, as they are as abundantly shitful as K e n's.  Well done
Troll, you get my vote for lamefuck of the year!!!!!
 
> I will take the loss as a simple affirmation of how much I actually get to you
> all.  Another job well done.
> 
> 				Troll

As said moron, you don't "get to" anyone, you simply give people a reason to
exist, as your posts reinforce how much of a geek you are, which is extremely
amusing!   8*)

	Chris........"why not laugh at Troll, everyone else is!"
From: cress@endeavor.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Worthless
Date: 20 Nov 1992 14:00:39 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: endeavor.ksu.ksu.edu




This is the first time I have ventured into this group and I can already see that
all of you are fuckin imbeciles.  You don't even discuss anything of value.  
Whadda ya do, just wait for an article like this one, then sit around with one
thumb up your loose ass while you type away with the other hand?  You idiots
must harbor a tremendous amount of hate at the world, maybe cause your dad 
wouldn't let you have a turn with your sister the last time you visited home.

						the gmeister
						get used to it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: To shitCANada and the Kanucks.
From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:58:28 GMT
Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)

In article <Bxzpqw.28K@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM> jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods) writes:
>In <1992Nov18.105025.1@jaguar.uofs.edu> jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>>Well Kanuck, at least my country isn't so dependent on foreign investment like
>>your leech nation.
>
>Priced the Rockefeller Center recently, dildohead?

And don't forget all the hardwood from the Northwest that goes to Japan.

All the Alaskan oil that goes to Japan.

Honda America, Toyota America, Sony America, Matsushita America, Mazda America,
Mitsubishi America ...........

And all the Japanese money tied up in American hardware and software companies.

-- 

Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.UUCP	unixland!rmkhome!rmk	rmk@frog.UUCP
From: cress@cutlass.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Worthless
Date: 20 Nov 1992 19:56:02 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: cutlass.ksu.ksu.edu


Ooooooohhhhh, goodness Rob, you sure embarrassed me.
You just put my adress right out there so everyone can see it.
You probably thought you were pretty damn keen being able to hunt out
my name and then type it in.
Of course this probably WAS an accomplishment since you were wanking off
with a baseball lodged in your ass.  In fact, that's must have been how you got
the idea that I "masturbates then ejaculates".

As far as the nickname, I'm gonna keep using it just to piss you off.
The the phrase after it will be used as in "`get used to it` rob when I make
you wanna crawl back into the dwarfs ass you came out of."
Get it.

I also noticed that you didn't deny the fact that you are inbred.
Of course we all would've known since live in the hillbilly state of Virginia.

                                     the gmeister
				     get used to it (Rob)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: tedebear@leland.Stanford.EDU (Theodore Chen)
Subject: Re: Flag Waiving (Re: Whining about buying American cars)
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 06:24:03 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.154721.27273@kocrsv01.delcoelect.com> c23st@kocrsv01.delcoelect.com (Spiros Triantafyllopoulos) writes:
>In article <1992Nov17.144352.23721@bnr.ca> dclayton@bnr.ca (Don Clayton) writes:
>>               **** JAYS in 6 - WORLD CHAMPIONS! ****
>Yo, Don, who's waving more flags than YOU?
>
>For Gawd's sake, you win a Superbowl and it's like the end of the world as
>we know it... 

i know this isn't related to automobiles, but the jays are
a baseball team.  baseball teams don't play in the super bowl.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: Why Bush? (was: Why Clinton)
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:11:51 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.161814.11796@cas.org> esp51@cas.org () writes:

>
>That's obvious.  Looking yet deeper, psychological analysis of Little
>Willy's post reveals:
>
>  L. Willy's sacred authority figure G. Bush turns out to be a scum sucking
>  felon.  Willy's subsequent identity crises manifests in paranoid
>  delusions and emotional stress through which he can no longer
>  distinguish between fact and fantasy.  Hoping to preserve some semblance
>  of pathetic dignity in the face of overwhelming scorn, he resorts to
>  trivial semantic arguements , stubbornly refusing to give up the
>  ghost.  (Obvious parallels to Norman Bates character in Psycho I and II,
>  substituting dead mother with George Bush's rotting corpse.)
>
>Scott Park
>Opinions are mine, I am not company spokesman.

	Careful analysis, I can see. You forgot to include my Oedipus complex
and cross-dressing. I thank you for not including the bestiality, realizing
that while it at first seems to connected, is in fact only as a result of my
extensive candy deprivation as a child. Your ability to see the connection
between Psycho and my situation is truly impressive.

William Everett
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: troll masturbates all over Slobson.
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 21:43:54 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.135714.1@jaguar.uofs.edu>, jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
> 
> *Listen, Rob Slobson, before you were ever a newbie here in playland with this
>  scabby rabble, I was writing political satire for a subscriber list 50+ names
>  long.  And when you were just breaking wind with your first indignant post, I
>  was getting thrown off of channel insult on IRC because the pansy moderators
>  couldn't beat me.  So, when I post, I do you the service of allowing you to
>  observe my form so that you can better your own.  No thanx necessary.
>  This is nothing MACfacfuck&suck Bur or any of you other losers can boast.
>  All you do is post here and then tell each other how poorly you did in
>  comparison to each other, pretty pointless.   

Basically Mr. Troll has just proven that he has no life beyond the Net, or his
computer terminal. That would appear' pretty pointless' to me. So you have
carelessly asserted that Rob has a life, and you do not. I also find it hard to
believe that you are some sort of paternal figure on the Net, as you are still
in college. You imply that you have assessed some sort of elderly repect, when
in all likelihood you are a sophomore. I seriously doubt you are in Grad
school, which would only discredit Scranton's English department. You also
repetitively whine in your posts. I happily decline your "lesson".  
> 				Ta Ta for Now
> 
> 				Troll  ha hahahahaha!
Indeed.

--The Phantom
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Subject: Re: Melba SEZ "Sez"
Organization: University of Northern Indiana
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:26:02 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.005055.1@opie.bgsu.edu>, bc205cs@opie.bgsu.edu writes:
>Melba SEZ
>>Get a grip.  
>
>   Oooow.  Vicious retaliation.

I knew I was dealing with a puny intellect, but I thought you could
at least think of your own replies.

>   One more time, motherfucker:
>   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   |spending too much time in soc.culture.african-american.  Maybe you should| 
>   |have been spending your time in alts.destroy.the.earth, satanism, magick,|
>   |and evil.  Then you might be calling me Hum, or Joshua, or...            |
>   |_________________________________________________________________________|

Why would I call you Hum when your name is Chris.

>   Now, I suggest that you start attempting to gather information 

Shit!  Dobson is right, K e n is spreading.

>   [a lot of repetition]

>--Leah

You have become tiresome.

Melvin M. Gladstone
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 20 Nov 92 18:35:33 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
: In article <1449@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
: > Since Mr. K. Ryan has kindly re-posted his informative material
: > on Georgie Bush's atheist remarks, fulfilling Casper the Phriendly
: > Phantom's request to have his short-term memory backed up, I will
: > ONCE AGAIN pose the the questions the Limbots have been dodging:
: > 
: > 1) If George Bush was not suggesting that atheists are in some way
: > inferior U.S. citizens, and perhaps should not be considered
: > citizens at all, then WHAT WAS he saying?  What sort of code was he
: > using?
: >
: Ok, so what if GB goes on national TV today and states that all atheists
: are fuckers and should be shit on sight, what are you going to do about
: it?  fire him.
: 
: Everybody has a right to their own opinion.  If he really wanted to collect
: all the passports from athiests and throw them out of the country, he had
: a good few years to get it done.  Why do you think he didn't do it?
: 
: PS: I'm happy to find that nobody has flamed my .sig (yet).
: 
: PPS: Shut up.
: 
: -- 
:    _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
:   _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
:  _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
: _/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/


Umm... because he doesn't have the power?  

Hate yer .sig,
Bill
From: kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Hands across the waters [Was Re: Shut the fuck up]
Keywords: Bollocks, fuck, arsehole, cunt, plonker, shit-for-brains.
Date: 16 Nov 92 14:35:01 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b64746.student.cwru.edu

In article <936@dsbc.icl.co.uk> kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) writes:
>Allies?  fuck you geek.  The fuckers in the US planes paniced and blew up
>a bunch of British guys on the ground.  I think WE should find other allies
>or just come round and shoot at your arses for a change, fucking commie
>bastard.

	Paniced [sic]? Nay, lad! They were under orders...

You're better be glad for your squabs that the US command felt that too 
many "accidents" against british squabs may look "funny"!
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: RENAME: Those against name change PLEASE READ!
Date: 23 Nov 1992 15:34:01 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

i don't get it.  what name change?  my, miss a couple of weeks, you
just miss the whole fucking world, don'tcha?

so, what, 'they're' gonna change the name, finally make it official
...



     ALT.LAME

???


just tell me when it happens so i can log back in and toast my
marshmallows :)

moi
>>---|>
From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Date: 16 Nov 92 15:56:43 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett) writes:
: In article <1399@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
: >Hmm.  I see.  He said it, but he didn't really mean it; and even
: 
: >Bill l
: 
: 	You are really incredibly dense, aren't you? Have you been paying any
: attention? Do you have a special kind of monitor that changes around the
: words to say what you want them to?
: 	It's been pretty much proven, and for that matter admitted, that he
: DIDN'T SAY IT! Is that clear enough?
: 
: William Everett

Oh, Willy.  Willy, my lad, I have to conclude that you are
impenetrably stupid.  If it will make you happy, I will publically
admit that the Bush quote was not word-for-word what was posted;
 only the meaning was the same.  Since you haven't been able to 
 come up with any alternative meaning which might make this 
 conversation worthwhile, why don't you just sink back into your
 ditto-head torpor and let the grown-ups finish supper?
 Bill

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: uh-oh, tilden, i dont think we're in kansas anymore@!
Date: 23 Nov 1992 15:24:39 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <1992Nov16.204711.25314@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>,
rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>> tilden@venture.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>
>>Tilden has spoken
>
>the world has yawned.
>
the dog has belched ...

moi
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: Why Clinton
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 03:17:45 GMT

In article <1427@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>, libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
> Oh, Willy.  Willy, my lad, I have to conclude that you are
> impenetrably stupid.  If it will make you happy, I will publically
> admit that the Bush quote was not word-for-word what was posted;
>  only the meaning was the same.  Since you haven't been able to 
>  come up with any alternative meaning which might make this 
>  conversation worthwhile, why don't you just sink back into your
>  ditto-head torpor and let the grown-ups finish supper?
>  Bill

Ok wilbur you SnivelingSadoSelfEroticisit how about you cite some sources, the
article, the author, the paper, or if you saw it on T.V. (as if you can read a
paper) give the date, the interviewer, the station and the time of the
interview. You claim to have cited it word for word, so it should be easy for
you to reply. Right?

--The Phantom
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Top ten anagrams of "Bruce Bufalini" and "Kenneth Robinson"
Keywords: anagrams, ken, bruce
Date: 22 Nov 92 03:20:48 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

jac@doe.carleton.ca (James A. Cherry) writes:
>TOP TEN ANAGRAMS OF "KENNETH (J.) ROBINSON":
>
>   10. Been inkhorn snot
>    9. Inherent knob son
>    6. Nth son in bone jerk  [The TRUE story of Ken's birth]
>    5. Ken: throbs in none   [Except Bruce, maybe]
>    4. Oh, no: bent skinner!
>    3. N.B. Shot jerk in none  [But Borg can't ejaculate, can they?]
>    2. Hint, Ken: no boners  [Try women instead]
>    1. Boners, then inn, OK?  [Ken's daily request to Bruce, no doubt]
>--
>James A. Cherry                                         "Deal with it, pal!"


HO HO HO!  A round of applause, please!

-- Andy
From: kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: After much thought,
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 22:48:14 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: b64746.student.cwru.edu


	I have concluded that K e n is correct. K e n is K e n. K e n can 
not be smart, as K e n is K e n. If K e n was smart, K e n would not be 
K e n. Thank you for enlightening us, oh great K e n.
 
Newsgroups: alt.flame