HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: luden@lehigh.edu (Dean E. Nelson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Quayle/Bush Competency?
Date: 28 Aug 92 17:26:37 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University Computing Center

In article <1992Aug27.031148.12987@ttinews.tti.com> bsmart@bsmart.TTI.COM (Bob Smart) writes:

>In article <1992Aug25.114434.2017@wkuvx1.bitnet>, barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:

>> Quayle isn't some bumbling idiot; he's a very competent politician.

>This is a non-sequitur: Dan is living (?) proof that one can be BOTH a
>bumbling idiot AND a competent politician. 

Dwell on that a bit...How did he get elected to the senate, and how did he 
get chosen to be Vice President?  What are the minimum qualifications?  I 
took GHWB's advice when he said "Judge my decision making ability by my 
choice for Vice President" just before announcing his selection of Qualye 
in '88.  So let it be written, so let it be done!

Dean Nelson den0@lehigh.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: wilder@mik.uky.edu (jeff wilder)
Subject: Re: Quotes????
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 18:49:38 GMT

Dan Quayle is the most eloquent public speaker ever to fill the halls
of this God-fearing country with his masterful voice.

And you can QUOTE me!

<snicker>

--
================================================================================
| Jeff W   uk06666@ukpr.uky.edu | Meddle not in the affairs of cats, for they  |
| Wilder   & wilder@mik.uky.edu | are subtle, and will piss on your cyberdeck. |
================================================================================
From: shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Dan's Kid Conceived Before Marriage?
Date: 28 Aug 92 13:41:00 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

slarsen@schumann.helios.nd.edu (susan larsen) writes:

>In article <1992Aug25.205915.3530@beaver.cs.washington.edu> dbj@cs.washington.edu (Dave Johnson) writes:
>>In article <sysmatt.714729758@aix3090b.uky.edu> sysmatt@aix3090b.uky.edu (Matt Simpson) writes:
>>>zaccone@rigel.cs.bucknell.edu (Rick Zaccone) writes:


>Hmmm, exam schedule?  Wouldn't that put the birth in April or May?
>You know, the fourth or fifth month of 1974?

It could have been Fall Exams.



-- 
Susan R. Hagan (shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu) 
Publications Coordinator - User Services
Rutgers University Computing Services
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cortez@milton.u.washington.edu (Tom Warner)
Subject: Re: The ad campaign continues (#8)
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 05:36:45 GMT

In article <9208232054.AA20159@MIT.EDU> dks@MIT.EDU (dks) writes:
>
>   ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>        1992       George Bush  &  Dan Quayl       1992
>        
>          "Status quo" is Latin for Change -- Honest!
>
>   ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>Paid for by Latin Americans for Quayl.
>
Oh, but I read that Quayle actually knew, he was
just saying he wished he'd been a better Latin
student in college so he'd stand a chance of understanding
a little spanish.

It was in a column by a Quayle apologist.

He didn't address such things as the "Burger King incident" or other
notorious Dan activities.
D
notorios activities of our belowed "gaffe-prone oaf."A
>
From: michael@paul.bu.edu (Michael Chaplin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan
Date: 1 Sep 92 17:01:38 GMT
	<1992Aug31.221643.5142@peponi.wcc.govt.nz>
	<1992Aug31.231915.25213@athena.cs.uga.edu>
	<1992Sep1.023641.7288@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Organization: Boston University
In-reply-to: wolf@leland.Stanford.EDU's message of 1 Sep 92 02:36:41 GMT

In article <1992Sep1.023641.7288@leland.Stanford.EDU> wolf@leland.Stanford.EDU (Andy Wolfsberg) writes:


=Good, get the hell out of our country twit. We don't want ya anyway. But don't
=moan like that.  For crying out loud, are you forced to go to school in GA? 
=I hardly believe it.  Go somewhere else in the country and you'll find
=change from DEEP SOUTH mentality.  Move to another country and you'll be whining
=for the consumer environment you've got RIGHT HERE in the USA.
=Heck, I despise George and the DANglement as much as the rest of you but this 
=kinda whining makes me wanna barf.
                              ^^^^
I believe you mean _bush_.

=Now that I've got that off my chest (fingertips?), I'll go eat a piece of candy and hope I feel better.

  =Andy [stuff deleted]

Chaplin.
--
===========================================================================
Michael Chaplin                    Language is a virus from outer space.
michael@albert.bu.edu                     - William S. Burroughs

The Einstein Papers Project        The opinions contained herein reflect
Boston University                      neither those of the project, 
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.          nor those of Albert Einstein.
From: stanton@athena.cs.uga.edu (Catherine Stanton)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bye Bye Dan -- VOTE TO MAKE SURE THIS BECOMES A REALITY
Date: 29 Aug 92 22:15:38 GMT
Organization: University of Georgia, Athens

In article <13549.2a9efe68@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu> vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:
>might win.
>
>MAKE SURE YOU VOTE!!! IF YOU DONT VOTE THE SLIMES WILL TAKE IT AGAIN!!!
>EVEN IF YOU LIVE IN CALIFORNIA/OREGON/WASHINGTON/IDAHOE
>VOTE, DONT BELIEVE THE POLLS. VOTE VOTE VOTE!
I wouldn't usually agree with someone who posted in all caps, but here
I think it is more than appropriate.  This guy has a point, to make
sure Dan-O is no longer a heartbeat away...we all have to VOTE.  Matter
of fact, I'm not yet registered because I'm not in my hometown at the
moment, but I'm calling them up on Monday (the Athens Courthouse that
is) to make sure I will be back in time to get registered, if not I
will find some other way, but ya gotta vote to make sure these clowns
don't win.

>And maybe we'l get the fun of watching Our Hero in the unemployment line.
>My predictions:
>
>	DQ/MQ divorce. MQ restarts her career. DQ writes a book :)
It will be awhile, DQ still needs to learn how to write, and probably
type too.  And wow with all those neat-o computers out there with those
really hard word processors, he might NEVER do it at all.  At least lets
hope not.  Then again, if the First Dog can come out with a book *puke*
there's always hope that Dan-O might be able to eek one out.

My prediction: Sure MQ restarts her career, but this time as an
Eastern Onion actress doing singing Prince Charles telegrams.

Catherine Stanton
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: glass@adcalc.fnal.gov (Michael Glass)
Subject: alt.fan.eileen-simpson
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-a4  
Reply-To: glass@adcalc.fnal.gov
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Distribution:  world
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 01:28:39 GMT

Re: <1992Aug20.030810.13510@nntp.uoregon.edu>,
    <1992Aug20.032449.14678@nntp.uoregon.edu>
    (Also similar posts from other folks.)

Bless you, Ms. Simpson.  Let me know when you form a fan group.

Next to your writings, ours are but an inchoate primal scream.

The group alt.fan.eileen-simpson will be devoted to those for whom
government is not an abstraction, but who see and feel the connection
to their live, and can write from both the head and the gut.

-- Michael Glass
   glass@adcalc.fnal.gov
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bryan@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov (Bryan L. Allen)
Subject: Re: Phil Gramm
Followup-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Summary: He be Boring...
Keywords: droning boring
Organization: Only Occasionally
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 21:37:40 GMT

In article <BPNFqB1w165w@fennec.sccsi.com> popec@fennec.sccsi.com (William C. Barwell) writes:
>Eris Seiferman, (Aug 31), posts the thought that Danny Boy's main 
>opponent in 96 will be Pat "Cultural Warfare" Buchanan. Soory to say this 
>is wrong.  It will be Texas' own Senator Phil Gramm.  For those who don't 
>know Gramm is one of the handful of Congresscritters that were Reagan 
>Robots in 1980.  He was one of the true architecys of Reaganomics, and as 
>dangerous a fool as you will find in the Congress.  Watch this guy.  He 
>is creepy in a special way that only old time Phil Gramm watchers can 
>really appreciate.

If his speech at the RepubConvention was any indicator, this guy
has all the panache and popular appeal of an Andy Gump Pumper Truck.

Kinda like J. Dan Quayl on industrial-strength barbituates.

("Andy Gump" is the company name of a supplier of portable outhouses
in the Los Angeles area).



-- 
            Bryan L. Allen       bryan@devvax.jpl.nasa.gov
            Telos Corp./JPL      (818) 306-6425
From: sandya@hpfcmdd.fc.hp.com (Sandy A)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 18:57:12 GMT
Subject: Re: Re: Abortion is Stealing! (was Re: DATELINE: Bush fucks up!)
Organization: HP Mechanical Design Division
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle

Bush/Quayle oppose abortion, but would support their family members who
had one.

This seems so bizarre to me.  Bush and Quayle seem to be saying "I don't
believe in it personally, but I would let others make their own decision."
This is the PRO-CHOICE position!

So who do they oppose it for?  Unfortunately, the answer is you and me,
(i.e. anyone not personally close to them).  Or, "it's okay for my family,
as we are refined, moral, good people, and the need for an abortion would
be justified in some way.  It's just when all those slutty cultural elite
women have them on a whim that I'm bothered about it."

Also, regarding the argument that says "supporting the child doesn't mean
you support the crime" doesn't make sense to me.  On one hand, the
position of the rep. party seems to be that abortion is:

* Morally wrong.
* A sin.
* Murder.
* Something that should be outlawed in all cases, even rape/incest.

But, hey, if my daughter/granddaughter wanted one, I'd support her! (BTW,
what does support mean?  I won't disown her?  Won't try to talk her out of
it?  Won't offer to take the baby?  Won't do a damn thing to stop what is
supposedly the *murder* of their own flesh and blood?)

They are trying to have it both ways.  "Look, pro-lifers, it says right
here in the platform we're against this evil thing!  But (wink-wink) we
support "our" women if they decide to do it!

I'm voting for Clinton/Gore.
From: barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: "Liberal" - A Misnomer
Date: 27 Aug 92 15:20:54 CDT
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <1992Aug26.165658.10295@tessi.com>, chris@tessi.com (Chris Lamb) writes:
> 
> LIBERALS!  GIVE ME A BREAK!
> 
> 
[all kinds of junk follows]
>
> rave, Rave, RAVE!!

I'll say.

> Waiting for the worms to come,

I'd say they're already here.  Check inside your head. 
> -- chris@tessi.com
> 

PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT

  Just in case anybody didn't get it, my two letters (Liberals... and
Bush and Quayle Competency?) were meant to be facetious,
argumentative, outspoken, and pretty much just generally obnoxious.
Well, parts of them anyway.
  I do support the Free Trade Act, I don't think Quayle's as stupid as
everyone says he is (first off, it's just not possible he's lived 40
years if he's _that_ dumb), etc.  Yes, I do think there are people out
there wearing the name "liberal" who would rather tell you you're a
narrow-minded bigot if you disagree with them (I've gotten letters
from a few).  But I don't think liberals in general are the bogeymen.
  In case anybody's interested, I'm thinking about making my ranting
and raving a weekly (or twice-weekly) feature.  If I do, please send
the shorter and/or dumber ones to me, rather than waste band width.

  PS-I've heard from the liberals and one or two moderates; anybody
agree with anything I've said (no smart remarks, please).

  That's my opinion - it ought to be yours. :) :) :) (get the point?)

                                 -Jeff (AKA Fred the Infamous)

(yes, I know some of my letters are signed Fred; just don't ask!)
From: scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Tucker's e-mail
Summary: Tucker is a Republican
Date: 4 Sep 92 19:36:44 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: The Ohio State University

In article <1992Sep4.002215.23246@lsil.com> mitch@lsil.com writes:

  >BTW, how do you know that Tucker is a republican?  If he has any brains,
  >he's probably not.

Because I am the person who started this thread (telling people to leave Tucker
out of it), I am reluctant to bring up additional info that might change
people's minds about my point. But the truth must be told...

Back in...May, I think, Tucker made an appearance in Columbus for the Young /
College Republicans. He gave a short, canned speech praising the Bush/Quayle
ticket. So we can say with some certainty that he is, indeed, a Republican.

Even with this in mind, I still think that harrassing the younger Quayle would
be wrong. Yes, he has campaigned for the ticket, but he is still an 18-year-old
freshman who is living away from home for the first time, and harrassing him 
with nasty e-mail will neither change the mind of the receiver nor reflect well
on the sender.

Again, I will step down from my soapbox. Carry on.
|
|
-- 
    Steve Casburn (scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu)
    *The* Ohio State University
    "New occasions teach new duties; Time makes ancient good uncouth /
     They must upward still and onward who would keep abreast of Truth..."
From: sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: AN ANAGRAM!!! WE HAVE ONE!!!
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 14:59:20 EDT
Organization: Monsoon Software, Inc.

bwatson@nyx.cs.du.edu (bruce watson) writes:

> In article <3FiRPB1w164w@monsoon.com> sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta) writes:
> >s5202734@titan.ucc.umass.edu (s5202734) writes:
> >
> >>     Many years ago, isaw the following anagram (I don't recall the source,
> >> no attribution):
> >> 
> >>    Spiro Agnew <===> Grow a Penis
> >
> >The guy who discovered this one is (get this) Dick Cavett.
> >
> >Sunil Gupta
> >Monsoon Software, Inc.
> >sg@monsoon.com
> 
> Did he discover it? I heard him say it on TV but was it original with him?

I can say for sure, but he's my original source for the quote. Also,
none other than Dave Barry attributes the anagram to him.

Sunil Gupta
Monsoon Software, Inc.
sg@monsoon.com
From: rone@aludra.usc.edu (Ron Echeverri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: family values
Date: 26 Aug 1992 14:50:49 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

In article <1992Aug26.213817.1813@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> bsc7@po.CWRU.Edu (Bradley S. Corsello) writes:
>In a previous article, cindy@solan10.solan.unit.no (Cynthia Kandolf) says:
>>>>>DEFICIT SCHMEFICIT!
>>>>(As long as I'm rich)
>>>not if the US dollar takes a nose dive.
>>What do you mean, "if"?
>Good observation. I'm suprised no one had mentioned it yet.  The headlines
>should read:
>BUSH GIVES ACCEPTANCE SPEECH:  STOCK MARKET AND DOLLAR PLUMMET

Or, in the words of Ron Headrest's prediction:

"Bush elected president while thousands committ suicide. Film at 11."

5150
with apologies to garry b. trudeau
From: vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The Dannikinsey Report is non-fiction.  REALLY!
Date: 30 Aug 92 08:05:09 GMT

In article <1992Aug29.221128.7386@athena.mit.edu>, dks@athena.mit.edu (dks) writes:
> Friends:
> 
> 
> After I posted the Dannikinsey Report a few weeks ago:
> 
> 
>         "Show me a man who plays a good game of golf, and
>            I'll show you a man who is neglecting something."
> 
>                                      -- John Fitzgerald Kennedy
> 
> 
>         "Anyone who knows Dan Quayle knows that, given a choice
>            between golf and sex, he'll choose golf every time."
> 
>                                      -- Mrs. Marilyn Quayle
> 
> 
> I received several messages from people urgently seeking to know whether
> the second part of the Report is authentic.  Did I make it up, they wanted
> to know.  Was it just another liberal lie planted in the name of bad humor,
> they wanted to know.  Would I quit making such scurrilous accusations, they
> wanted to know.  I am happy to confirm that the answer to all these questions
> is a resounding "NO!"  The woman actually said it, and she was completely
> sober at the time.  And she *was* talking about her One and Only.
> 

I can believe that she said it. But a REFERENCE would be handy. If you
can find it please post it. Without a reference it is useless jibberish.
WITH a reference it is undeniable proof and more ammunition :)

-Garrett

> 
> Dhanesh
> 
> PS: Folks, if you're going to call me a liar, just use "liar," OK?
>     After all, it's got four letters -- what more could you possibly
>     want in a word?
> 
>
From: rone@aludra.usc.edu (Ron Echeverri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: ABORTION
Followup-To: alt.atheism,talk.religion.misc,talk.abortion
Date: 31 Aug 1992 18:04:19 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

In article <1992Aug31.123339.2088@wkuvx1.bitnet> barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
>In article <392@slc1.UUCP>, ta@slc1.UUCP (Tony Alicea) writes,
>concerning abortion:
>> I will die fighting religious bigots who want to impose thier religious 
>> beliefs on me before I tolerate them!
>  Do we have a right to stop or punish murder?  By all means.  If you
>  believe abortion = murder (like Danny Q. does - had to put that in
>  there to keep the "You-Didn't-Talk-About-Quayle" people off my
>  back), would it not be logical to do everything you can to pre-
>  vent it?

As we can see with _real_ murder, it doesn't stop happening by making
it illegal.

If it's going to happen, it should happen in a hospital, with a real
doctor, in a caring environment.  Not in a back alley with Coat Hanger
Guido.

>> If you don't believe in abortion, by all means DON'T HAVE ONE!
>  Substitute "murder" -"If you don't believe in murder, don't kill
>  anyone".  If abortion = murder, we have a right- no, an obligation-
>  to put an end to it.

How do you propose putting an end to it?

>> Ah, I guess, just like Bush, you don't
>> think they are human beings, right?!  Religion = Superstition.
>  No, religion does not = superstition.  Is religion a faith? Yes.
>  Is atheism a faith? Yes!  The non-existence of God cannot be 
>  proven; you can't prove a negative.  Likewise, the existence of
>  God cannot be proven absolutely until you see Him yourself.  So,
>  does this mean Atheism = Superstition?

I guess we'll know when we die.

Atheism discussions to alt.atheism or talk.religion.misc.
Abortion discussions to talk.abortion.

5150
thank you
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush
From: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Subject: I...RON...NEE
Reply-To: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 21:09:50 GMT

In article <saurav.714947184@cory.Berkeley.EDU>, saurav@cory.Berkeley.EDU
(Saurav Chatterjee) writes:
> elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley) writes:
> 
>>You're right, but 'Rubbers' Bush is indeed making it an issue.  GOP
surrogates
>>are running around talking about Clinton's 'bimbo eruptions' and that he is a
>>'skirt chaser.'  This makes the fact that Rubbers has cheated on Bar very
>>important.  Rubbers talks about how he is the candidate that can be trusted,
>>and that his party has God on their side.  Yet he has a record of lying, and
>>his 'family values' don't show much respect for fidelity in marriage.
> 
>I just find it funny that they talk about family values when the
>Republican god, Ronald Reagan, had the most anti-family in the world. 
>I think half his children wrote books denouncing Ron & Nancy. And
>wasn't Ronald Reagan divorced?
> 
>Saurav

   "Twice married Reagan, who's three children have four divorces among them,
had no comment"

-Roland Hedly Jr. from Doonesbury (by G. B. Treudeau).

   Reagan's first wife was Jane Wymann (sp?), an actress.  Recall the movie
marque in _Back to the Future_?  They were co-starring in "Cattle Queen of
Montana".  I guess Ron _never_ wore the pants in _either_ marriage.

   Also, if I recall, there is circumstantial evidence that Ron and Nancy had a
shotgun wedding.  For that matter Reagan was the only U. S. president to lead a
labor union *shudder*  Guy sure has good conservative, familly values type
credentials.

   So Reagan was not only a _member_ of the Hollywood media elite but he 
_married_ one.  Let's see.  Quayl has denounced the elite he was born into and
the eliete that his political Grandfather was employed in...

                            ...I'm gonna HURL...
Dan
Danwell@IASTATE.EDU
 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: dks@MIT.EDU (dks)
Subject: "I can even forgive Bush for Dan Quayle, but not for this."
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 10:09:51 EST
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA23166; Sun, 30 Aug 92 07:19:09 -0700
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA11888; Sun, 30 Aug 92 07:19:04 -0700
X-Received: from TMS-E40-PORT-5.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTPid AA16516; Sun, 30 Aug 92 10:18:41 EDT
X-To: alt.fan.dan-quayle.usenet
X-Cc: alt.politics.bush.usenet, alt.politics.clinton.usenet
X-Command: Send_AEvt(doAutoForward)


 ATLANTA, GEORGIA, U.S.A., 1992 AUG 28 (NB)
  -- by Dana Blankenhorn

 At the end of a "CBS Evening News" broadcast this week, correspondent
 and Miami resident Bernard Goldberg told anchor Dan Rather "We've gotten
 very good at covering the suffering of other people.  It's different when
 it happens to you."  [...]
 
 Truer words were seldom spoken. And in the wake of the terrible
 storm, the time has now come for an evaluation of how well "we" did.
 
 First, I'd give a gold medal to Goldberg, Rather, and their TV colleagues
 for coverage of the disaster [...]
 
 The silver medal goes to the area's telecommunications companies [...]
 
 The bronze medal goes to the thousands of volunteers [...]
 
 Finally, the US government. Bill Clinton may not want to make
 political hay out of this mess, but someone has to say it. The
 lack of coordination of volunteers, which should have been done
 by our government, has been shameful. The National Guard was
 called out, but did nothing but stand guard over the ruins. We
 have become experts at moving masses of people thousands of miles
 for killing other people, or for protecting property. If ever a
 crisis called for military action, not to kill or protect but to
 relieve suffering, this was it. One of our own Air Force bases
 was destroyed, for pity's sake, and the Air Force only let
 resident-victims in for a few hours to pick through the debris of
 their lives, kicking them out at 5 PM for fear they might...what?
 I don't know.
 
 It is one thing when suffering in Somalia or Bosnia is ignored
 for weeks, and people brutalize one another. One can argue that
 is not our government's problem. But to watch what is happening
 in South Florida right now, emergency workers begging their
 government for supplies on television, while the government frets
 it hasn't gotten the proper paperwork, just turns my stomach. Our
 citizens have been thousands of points of light in this crisis.
 But our government, which could have coordinated that light, and
 which should have used all its might to relieve the suffering,
 has done too little.
 
 I can forgive George Bush a lot of things. Maybe the economy is
 bad all over the world. Maybe he's never made a mistake in
 foreign policy, and can't be blamed for extremism within his own
 party. I can even forgive Dan Quayle. But this I can't forgive.
 And this I won't forget in November.
 
 (Dana Blankenhorn/19920828)