From: wilcox@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
Subject: <None>
Date: 28 Sep 92 14:14:32 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620

In article <DiFRRB7w165w@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>, yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Dave Shariff Yadallee) writes:
> 
> What I am against, from a political, national, religious, moral and historical
> point of view is that Maastricht is the key to letting the Anti-Christ come to
> power.
> 
Try again Dave. You mean you are against Maastricht because Damien will succeed
Jaques Delors? Or are you so unhinged that you consistently contradict
yourself, thereby becoming consistently inconsistent as it were?

> Politically, historically and nationally,  attempts to unite Europe have ended
> in a major botch.  Napoleon plundered Europe to make France the greatest
> dictatorship and most hated one of its time.  Similarly with Hitler.  I do see
> a similar pattern if a USE head of state is chosen.  This person would be MORE
> corrupt than Hitler, Stalin and Napoleon put together.  And we have the
> technology to do it.

Which is why you are living near to a country whose recent heads of state have 
been corrupt, senile, drug dealers and liars. Not to mention xenophobic and 
stupid to boot.
> 
> Religiously and morally,  it is written in the Revelation according to John,
> that Rome is going to be the seat of this Empire.  Brussels I do believe will
> get lose to Rome, thus completing this prohecy.  I heard the argument that the
> USA is scared of this because it would mean a loss of its economical
> influence.  WHO CARES ??!!

Well if St John had written that Brussels would be the seat of the empire he
would never have been put in the bible. As for the USA's economical influence,
it's gone in this part of the world.
> 
> What scares me my fellow Britons is that we are being blinded by a dangerous
> offer of power that would sacrifice the British identity!!  Scotalnd, Wales,
> England, is Union with Europe worth selling your sole for?  

Billinsgate will probably give you a good price for it.

> I say NEVER.
> Despite the corruption that was the British Empire, Britain would be better
> off going her own trying for a national alliance with the countires that
> retain her majesty as Head of State.
From the point of view of self-interest that doesn't work: most of them are
extremely poor and in need of massive amounts of aid. At least in Europe we'll
soon qualify for handouts from Germany.
> 
> Let us be wary of europeans baring powerful gifts.
> 
As long as they cover themselves up again afterwards I for one won't complain.

> A final note, I adhere to Elim Pentacostal and the Baptist philosophy in the
> United Kingdom religiously speaking.
> 
The happy-clappy dunkin' repenters many of whom seem to believe that
"Conservative" is synonymous with "Christian" and "Family Values" once existed.

> Dave Shariff Yadallee (yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca,
> userLIBE@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca)
> God Save the Queen, God Bless us All! Remember! Jesus Saves!!

He was also a communist, a pacifist and a devout Jew.
 
> Canadians: send a clear message to the government!  ON Oct. 26, Abstain

That way they'll know you don't care.
-- 

Stephen Wilcox             |   Remember what happened to the dinosaurs!
wilcox@maths.oxford.ac.uk  |    I did---and look what happened to me.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british,rec.arts.books