HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-To: PO%"notis-l@tcsvm"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Wed, 26 Aug 1992 10:04:38 EST
From:         Gary Charbonneau 812-855-7941 <CHARBONN@UCS.INDIANA.EDU>
Subject:      NOTIS, OCLC, and the 029 field

The Aug. 1992 issue of NOTISes contains the following statement on
p. 12:

   "OCLC is validating and defining Field 029 (Other system
   control number) for OCLC use only.  In cases where the 029
   displays, it will appear on PRISM exported records unless the
   user deletes it.  Since NOTIS defines this field for the UPC
   (Universal Product Code) used in 5.1 LSER, we recommend that
   users delete this field from the OCLC online record before the
   record is exported."

I have been trying to assess the significance of this statement.
According to OCLC Technical Bulletin 197, p. 3:

   "Field 029 contains the system control number used for records
   from other (non-OCLC) automated systems; such as, the British
   Library and National Library of Canada.  Field 029 is used to
   process and track records from other systems.

   "In the PRISM service, field 029 displays in the following
   circumstances: It displays if you lock a record that contain an
   029 field; it displays to your institution--and only your
   institution--if you have input the record and data from the
   records of other automated systems are added to the record.

   "In the First System, field 029 displays to all users."

I would like to test (in our test region, where 5.1 is installed),
the NOTIS assertion that you can get around the problem by
deleting the 029 from the OCLC record before you export it; this
sounds implausible.  I would also like to find out what happens if
you don't: Does the record transfer successfully?  What happens to
the 029?  Does it index as a UPC?  And finally, does any of this
matter?

In order for me to perform this test, I need to find a record that
contains an 029.  All the NLC records I've looked at in OCLC lack
one.  This leads me to believe that it may only occur on records
processed by OCLC after their implementation of USMARC Update No.
4, which happened only a few weeks ago.  If anyone runs across an
NLC (or other) record containing an 029, or has any other light to
shed on this topic, I would appreciate the information.

- Gary Charbonneau
  Library Automation Office
  Indiana University Libraries
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 09:53:39 EST
From:         Jim Zarecor <JLZ@JHUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: LB610 Abend and TSG Guide

Gina:

     TSG 6648 (formerly v282) says this about the abend0203:

     "LB003 has been unable to find an entry in LB000 (the brief batch
version of the tables) for the processing unit which it has encountered
in the current LIREQC record.

     "Have you reassembled linked (sic) LB000BAL since you added your
processing unit to LC101TB2? Is this the version of the LB000 phase
load module which is being loaded by LB610?

     "Could it be that the processing unit in the LIREQC record is
incorrect? This could happen if you use a 4.4 version of LB685 with a
4.5 item file to regen the action index."

     Hope this helps.

Jim Zarecor        Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore   JLZ@JHUVM
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 31 Aug 1992 07:21:44 EST
From:         Hal Cheney <LIBHALC@INDST.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Points on enhancement ballot

When I first noticed the anomolies in the NOTIS enhancement ballots
(20 vs. 10 points, and confused page number references), I did what
may appear to be a bizzare thing...I called Ann Greenseth at NOTIS
(her name is on the cover letter).  Ann told me that the 10 point
reference and the page number jumble resulted from their using the
1991 ballot boilerplate as a template for the 1992 ballot.

Many of you will recognize the way the convenience of a word processor
or text editor can easily do one in.  I've lost track of the times I've
carried wrong data over from the "seed" document into a target one.

Ann said the correct figure is 20 points.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 10:04:44 PDT
From:         Marlene Elster <9118MRE@UCSBVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Sending programs to NOTISPRO

I tried to send a couple of programs to NOTISPRO over two weeks ago and
have heard nothing and seen nothing in the FILELIST so I'm assuming I did
something wrong.  Should the programs be sent in a note?   Will a CMS
SENDFILE work?  The address I used was U3932 at UICVM.

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Marlene Elster, TECH1
University of California, Santa Barbara
(805) 893-3909
9118MRE@UCSBVM.BITNET
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 16:17:17 EDT
From:         Suzanna Lengyel <LENGYEL@YALEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: NOTIS Financial Feed to Business Office

This is in reply to the question posed by Gina Gestautas from the University of
Texas at Arlington.  I have modified the program that Harry Samuels sent to
NOTISPRO (I believe the program originated with Beth Nichols).  At Yale, we
have been using the program for fines and for credits, sending both to the
Bursar's Office.  I guess we are not using the X (externally billed). I did not
know that an F04 field existed.  Please feel free to ask me questions if
necessary either via e-mail (lengyel@yalevm), or by phone (203) 432-1844.
Suzanna Lengyel. Yale University Library Systems Office.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Tue, 1 Sep 1992 11:51:00 EDT
From:         Ron Johnston <ADLB001@MVS.MCGILL.CA>
Subject:      O'Brien
Comments: To: Notis Discussion <NOTIS-L%TCSVM.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>

For 5.0.2 sites (not earlier releases) who find that keyword O'BRIEN gives zero
hits, try deleting two lines of code in LPC100P.

WARNING:  I have not tried this change in any way.

After label SRQF01, look for the comment SHIFT DATA OVER FOR QUOTES.  The next
two lines prevent this function for a keyword search.  Try deleting them.
Again, I just ran across this code after reading the NOTIS-L comments on O'BRIEN
and have not even made the source change here.  Also, this part of the program
appears to be new for the 5.0.2 sub-release.

Ron Johnston  McGill University Libraries  Montreal Quebec

voice:        (514) 398-4797          |    S/390  ES/9000-320
fax:          (514) 398-7356          |    MVS/XA  CICS 1.7
internet:     ADLB001@MVS.MCGILL.CA   |    NOTIS 4.6.1
bitnet:       ADLB001@MCGILLVS        |    GTO 2-Utlas
telnet:       132.206.27.5            |    GTO 3-Bibliofile
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 12:09:00 EDT
From:         Ron Johnston <ADLB001@MVS.MCGILL.CA>
Subject:      taylor
Comments: To: Notis Discussion <NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.TULANE.EDU>

The problem yesterday was probably a "mail loop".

Any list can experience looping and various other problems.  The
"owner" of the list should be notified of the problems.  The owner
of NOTIS-L can be reached at LSVMAINT@TCSVM.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 09:13:52 CDT
From:         "Colegate V. Spinks" <ZCVS@ADM.ANGELO.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Mail to NOTIS is undeliverable
Comments: To: NOTIS/DOBIS discussion group list <NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU>
              2 Sep 1992 19:06:57 EDT from <FJH%SRU.bitnet@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU>

Earlier today I said:

>I tried the address "notis@TWAIN.NOTIS.COM" with similar results, I then
>tried "notis%TWAIN.NOTIS.COM@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU" with success. I suspect
>some sort of router problem somewhere.. (Just guessing)

I was incorrect, the second message just took longer to be undeliverable.
I suspect that they are just down, and there holding que is full if
they have that feature.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 08:04:18 CDT
From:         Jeffrey Trimble <JTRIMBLE@UA1VM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Light at the end of the Se-Lin tunnel?
              2 Sep 1992 20:55:00 CST from <GEMLI@CANAL.CRC.UNO.EDU>

We use the Vernon Se-Lin labels here that you speak of.  They come
with 6 accross (I think?!) and we have an Alps printer in use.  The printer
used NO platen, so there are no labels caught "going around".  So far,
so good.

We may be going to the NOTIS label feature in the near future.  (I'm not
too impressed with it at the present time.)

Hope this helps.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 14:22:58 -0500
From:         capital!taylor@UUNET.UU.NET
Comments: To: NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU

remote execution	[uucp job uunetCMB04 (9/3-14:39:20)]
	rmail efry sdewey
exited with status 1


	===== stderr was =====
Usage: rmail username
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 08:16:54 EDT
From:         Pam Gillespie <PRGHC@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: HANDICAPPED NOTIS WORKSTATIONS

I'd also be interested in the responses to the handicapped workstations
query, so please respond to the list.
Thanks.
Pamela Gillespie
Hunter College Library
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 13:51:00 EST
From:         "Robert H. Wittorf (219) 239-6429" <AX46LY@IRISHMVS.BITNET>
Subject:      HANDICAPPED NOTIS WORKSTATIONS
Comments: To: PACS-L@UHUPVM1.BITNET, NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET

[EXCUSE THE CROSS-POSTING ON NOTIS-L AND PACS-L]
I am interested in finding hardware/software configuations for
handicapped workstations for blind and partly-sighted individuals.
I am especially interested in workstations that primarily access
NOTIS.
Please reply to me directly.
Bob Wittorf
LZZTHW@IRISHMVS
University of Notre Dame
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Southern Methodist University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 31 Aug 1992 11:34:51 CST
From:         "Michael J. Stephens" <VB7R0007@SMUVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: GTO - LGT700B

SMU is also running the 5.0 version of the LGT700B program.  We are running
the 5.0.1 version of the LMS in production.  We have not had any problems
reported with this job. (knock on wood)  We are an MVS/XA shop.


Michael J. Stephens, Tech1
Sr. Systems Analyst II           *  Phone:    (214) 692-3453
Computer & Information Services  *  FAX:      (214) 692-3449
Southern Methodist University    *  Bitnet:   vb7r0007@smuvm1
Dallas, Tx. 75275-0262           *  Internet: vb7r0007@vm.cis.smu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 14:24:38 -0500
From:         capital!taylor@UUNET.UU.NET
Comments: To: NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU

remote execution	[uucp job uunetCLgo4 (9/3-14:38:51)]
	rmail efry sdewey
exited with status 1


	===== stderr was =====
Usage: rmail username
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 18:19:47 -0500
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was daviss@DAVIS.CUL.COLUMBIA.EDU
From:         Stephen Davis <daviss@CUNIXF.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Subject:      Binding slips from NOTIS?

We'd like to talk with anyone who has an operational program to print binding
slips from NOTIS.  I've already heard of a couple of sites working on this--
including some interesting stuff going on in Florida--but wondered if there
were others out there with working programs....

What we'd like to come up with is something that:

	--runs on a PC
	--uses fairly standard PC software (e.g., Kermit plus PASCAL or dBase)
	--allows the user to search the record "automatically" in
	CLIO by wanding in the item id
	--downloads and reformats data from the screen, using a little
	bit of intelligence in truncating the title
	--presents an image of the binding slip data on the screen and
	allows the staff member to do things like: fill in variable data,
	add the author if desirable, change the title if desirable, etc.
	(--maybe allows user to set some defaults for variable data at the
	beginning of a session?)
	--prints either on standard multipart forms or else two or three-up
	dot matrix or laser images.

We're assuming this would only be useful for monograph binding, since
we as most places have preprinted serial binding slips from our binder.

Anyone invented this wheel yet?

==============================================================================
Stephen Davis				email:  daviss@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu
Ass't Director for Library Systems 	voice:  (212) 854-4744
219M Butler Library 	   		fax:    (212) 222-0331
Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
==============================================================================
From: 344PWCF@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (Daniel Kirchner)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Subject: FYI: 2 new COBOL offerings in NOTISPRO (CHAT-L?)
Date: 26 Aug 92 15:36:42 GMT
Organization: Central Michigan University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

Dear folks, I have just sent two new programs to NOTISPRO and a new README.

LIB018 is the program we use to update the Bill/FINE and PATRON files after
data is transferred to Accounts Receivable.  This involves external billing
masking and dollar updates.

LIB019 is a utility program for reading a flat ORDER file to report on activity
concerning a SYSIN-directed julian date.
Dan Kirchner
TECH 1 Central Michigan University     "Underwhelmment Specialist"
FAX: (517) 774-6652 / VOICE: (517) 774-6643 / BITNET: 344PWCF@CMUVM
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R1).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Tue, 25 Aug 1992 10:32:27 CDT
From:         Bob Samson <SAMSON@LIBRARY.UTA.EDU>
Subject:      MDAS and PsycINFO

We are about to sign a lease with APA for the PsycINFO database,
which will be loaded as an MDAS file.  They have sent us a lease
amendment which requires us to process a correction tape at least
once a year.  This tape includes corrected records and delete records
which need to be applied against the existing database.  In reading
the PsycINFO load program documentation, it does not appear as though
replacement and deletion records are accommodated in the load process.

Is anyone successfully processing correction tapes for the
PsycINFO database?

Thanks.

Bob Samson
Assistant Director for Automation Services
University of Texas at Arlington
University Libraries
P.O. Box 19497
Arlington, TX  76019

(817) 273-3000 x4955
SAMSON@LIBRARY.UTA.EDU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 16:43:00 CDT
From:         "Mary Alice Ball, Loyola Univ." <ZMABBIE@LUCCPUA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: GTO - LGT700B

In reply to Maryanne Vaughan's question about other sites and their
experiences with LGT700B:

Loyola moved from 4.6 to 5.0.2 in production last weekend.  We have
been unable to get LGT700B to work.  Knowing that you used the 4.6
version with 5.0.2, I may suggest to our TECH1 that we do the same.

Thanks and good luck!

Mary Alice Ball
Loyola University of Chicago
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 27 Aug 1992 17:46:00 EDT
From:         "Darren.Meahl" <20676DOC@MSU.BITNET>
Subject:      Library/Computer Lab agreements

If anyone is willing to send me a copy of their written agreement between the
Library and the Computer Lab for operating NOTIS on a shared machine, PLEASE
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE send me a copy ASAP.   Electronic or paper or fax
or Pony Express or carrier pigion welcome.

THANKS IN ADVANCE!!!!

Yours, in desperation and panic,

Darren     8^)


Darren Meahl
Head of Systems
Michigan State University
Main Library--Systems Office
East Lansing, MI  48824-1048

Voice:  517-353-6752

FAX:  517-336-1445

Internet:  20676doc@msu.edu

Bitnet:  20676doc@msu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Original_To:  BITNET%"notis-l@tcsvm"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Wed, 2 Sep 1992 14:08:00 CDT
From:         VAUGHAN@VUCTRVAX.BITNET
Subject:      LGT700B problem resolved

   The version of GTO that ran under LMS 4.6 needed only the
GTO libraries in the LIBDEF, or search string. Starting with
5.0, you need to add the LMS library to the end of the LIBDEF.
The error is in LGT700J. A simple solution to a long-outstanding
problem! Thanks to everyone who responded.
Maryanne Vaughan
Vanderbilt University
VAUGHAN@VUCTRVAX
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 15:45:03 EDT
From:         Lisa McDavid <D020214@UNIVSCVM.BITNET>
              3 Sep 1992 14:23:31 -0500 from <capital!taylor@UUNET.UU.NET>

What's going on?  There are at least three copies of the same thing from
<capital!taylor@UUNET.UU.NET> in my mailbox, and none of them make sense.
It looks like an attempt at some sort of internal change that accidental-
ly went out as mail.  Is it?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 12:23:22 -0500
From:         capital!efry@UUNET.UU.NET
Comments: To: NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU

remote execution	[uucp job uunetCJo34 (9/3-12:13:44)]
	rmail efry sdewey
exited with status 1


	===== stderr was =====
Usage: rmail username
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: notis-l@tcsvm.bitnet
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 4 Sep 1992 15:11:48 -0600
From:         KLEIN@ACCDVM.ACCD.EDU
Subject:      2 copy holdings using GTO transfer

We are a new Notis site just starting with GTO.
When we transfer records from BIBLIOFILE using
GTO we are getting to copy holdings created.
Can anyone give me a clus to why this is happening.

Any help would be appreciated.


Randy Klein - TECH1
Alamo Community College District
klein@Accdvm.accd.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 12:20:54 -0500
From:         capital!efry@UUNET.UU.NET
Comments: To: NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU

remote execution	[uucp job uunetCKUI4 (9/3-12:14:05)]
	rmail efry sdewey
exited with status 1


	===== stderr was =====
Usage: rmail username
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 12:05:36 EDT
From:         Suzanna Lengyel <LENGYEL@YALEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: country codes for currency conversion

I can send you photocopies of the relevant pages if you send me your mailing
address.

Suzanna Lengyel. Yale University Library Systems Office. (203) 432-1844
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 09:54:33 EDT
From:         Gerard Philippe Menos <gpmenos@FIRESTONE.PRINCETON.EDU>
Subject:      Re: CHAT L: C & UNIX
Comments: To: NOTIS/DOBIS discussion group list <NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU>

> I tried to look up the original copy of this article.  I
> could not find an April 1 issue.  Is this cite really
> accurate?  Is this quote really true?
>

> ********************************

> *  SCOTT P. MUIR               *


It's *virtually* true, but not in any meaningful reality.

Phil
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 11:33:12 EDT
From:         Donna Alsbury <FCLDDA@NERVM.BITNET>
Subject:      1993 LMS Enhancement Survey
Comments: To: NOTISACQ@CUVMA.BITNET, Notis-L <notis-l@tcsvm.BITNET>

I just saw a copy of the survey and immediately noticed that many of
the enhancements are listed more than once (#7 Chain memo statements/
#54 Ability to write longer memos   #18 Keyword/Boolean searching in
staff mode/#71 Keyword searching in staff mode, for example). I'm
especially concered about duplication in the Acquistions and Serials
portions (since that's my area) but also see a lot of duplication in
other areas.

Does anyone have an idea as to how we can keep from splitting our votes
between different enhancements that really are for the same thing? Or
is NSI planning on combining those vote totals when they compile the
results.


Donna Alsbury
FCLA
(Co-Chair, Serials SIG)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: University of Texas at Arlington
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 07:45:55 CDT
From:         Gina Gestautas <C231GNG@UTARLVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      LB610 Abend and TSG Guide

Hi all,

Have a quick question that I am sure many of you have had to deal with
already.  This morning I came in early to find that my LB610 job had
abended with a 0203 code in the first step.  I check the reason code
and find that it says there is an incorrect Processing code in the
LIREQC file and to check TSG 6648.  I tried to find this code in all
the manuals that were given to me when I started.. but I cannot find the
TSG!!  I have the supplement.. but this only has the vnnn numbers..

Can someone either look this code up for me and or give me any possible
leads as to how I can determine WHICH record in the LIREQC file is the
culprit??  a File compare program (If I had one) would give me at least
a clue as to WHICH records were new since yesterday.. but even then..
I would have to check all the different record types before I was able
to figure out WHICH one had the invalid PU.  I already talked to our
LIB1 and he said that nothing was changed in the LCR file.  Is there
possibly a NOTISPRO sas program I can use to weed through the request file?
If I can't get any further.. guess I will have to talk to NOTIS....

Thanks for all help in advance.. guess that site support is baptism
by fire on the most part.

Gina Gestautas - TECH1               University of Texas at Arlington
C231GNG@UTARLVM1 (Bitnet)            c231gng@utarlvm1.uta.edu (Internet)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 10:12:08 EST
From:         Paul Asay <LIBASAY@INDST.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: kwb search exhausting temp stor

Increasing Temp Storage as Barbara suggested is certainly your first approach
and the least expensive.  The only problem is that a keyword search that
takes that much Temp Storage will also be dominating your CPU usage, causing
long delays for all other active users.  In order to address that we installed
'TMON' from Landmark Systems to automaticly purge tasks that used too much
I/O, or CPU time.  While TMON is great and has lots of uses, it would be nice
if Notis could find a way to do this for us, and save the funds for other
uses.  Not complaining, just dreaming!

We are currently using two 45 cylinder extents for Temp Storage, and have
a database with two million plus total records on the bib file.

***-------------------------------------***
* Paul Asay   Indiana State University    *
|             Cunningham Memorial Library |
|             Terre Haute, IN 47809       |
| Bitnet: libasay@indst    (812-237-2598) |
* Internet: libasay@cml.indstate.edu      *
***-------------------------------------***
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET",DIXON
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 28 Aug 1992 09:56:00 CDT
From:         Edie Dixon <DIXON@MACC.WISC.EDU>
Subject:      Re: 690 field and MHI

We are not experienceing this problem that I know of.  There is a trick to
getting the tags to display properly (since you have to modify the 360 tables in
order to get the 690 to index at all).  Call me if you need some help with this.
 I'll do my best

Edie Dixon, LIB1
U of Wisconsin
bitnet: DIXON@wiscmacc
phone: 608-262-3525
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU