From: Kim Nguyen <kimtrong@ocf.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: [SHOW 3] Con cho ddien Long Nguyen Nhanlong
Originator: daemon@media-lab.media.mit.edu
Reply-To: kimtrong@ocf.Berkeley.EDU
Organization: N/A
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 21:23:20 GMT





		thu*a anh long nguyen

	a^'y che^'t anh long ddu*`ng no'i the^'. to^i chi?
	du`ng tho* va(n loa`i cho' dde^? dda`m thoa.i vo*'i anh 
	aka con cho' ddie^n lytrucviet -  ngu*o*`i to^i ha(`ng 
	ngu*o*~ng mo^.. :-)
	anh long ki'nh me^'n xem tho* xong "laughed a little bit"
	cha(?ng ho'a ra anh tho^ng hie^?u ngo^n ngu*~ cu?a loa`i 
	cho' ddie^n a` ? anh co`n hie^?u ba`i tho* cu?a con kiki
	"is more like a joke" xem ra anh tho^ng minh cha(?ng ke'm 
	chi ddo^`ng loa.i vo*'i chu'ng ro^`i !! :-)

	va`i ha`ng phi'a du*o*'i, gia? lo*`i tha('c ma('c cu?a 
	anh:


>
>To Kim Nguyen,
>
>Your lastest action reminds me of TX who I despited.  So be ready
>to take my beating.
>
>I fought TX on SCV to:
>     1.  Establish a tradition not using person information to attack.
>         (Mud sling, na(.c danh, vu kho^'ng, phi? bang')
>
>     2.  Straight out the illogic (TX logic).  Introduce new logic.
>
>     3.  Introduce new way of thinking, objectively not subjectively.  
>         HOW (and WHY) is the word.
>
>     4.  etc...
>
>Every time I send a to SCV, I ask myself a question, "What is in it
>for SCV?"
>
>Before I joined SCV, I have asked myself a question, "What is in it
>for me to post SCV?"
>
>Your post bore no substance just a bunch of name calling.  I laughed
>a little bit as I read poem which is more like a joke.  Is this your
>way of contributing to SCV or/and just settling personal score?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>Tre^n ddo+`i kho' ma` hie^?u ddu+o+.c nhau!! Xong ne^'u
>>>no'i tra('ng dden ra thi` nhie^`u khi no' kho^ng ddu+o+.c
>>>hay ma^'y.

>>>Nhu+ng ma` ke^.

>>>Y' to^i muo^'n no'i la` "su+ cha" ca^.u dda^'y!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------


>
>While other brother Vietnameses are trying to defend our mother land, you
>chose to do this instead.  Shame on you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To^i chu+a bao gio+` mo*? mie^.ng xin ddo^`ng tie^`n hoa(.c ba't
>>>ga.o cu?a ca^.u hoa(.c ba^'t cu+' mo^.t ai ca? Ma` ca^.u co' cho
>>>to^i ddu+o+.c ba't co+m hay mie^'ng nu+o+'c chu+a?  Ma` gio+` na^`y
>>>ca^.u muo^'n da.y ddo+`i to^i !? Ca^.u cho' ma' vu+`a pha?i tho^i
>>>nhe'....
----------------------------------------------------------------------


>
>There is an idiom in Vietnamese for the act of doing dirty thing for 
>nothing:  Ca^`m cu cho' ddai'.  Remember that?
>

------------------------------------------------
>>>Tru+` phi ca^.u gio?i ca('n ca(.c to^i a^'y.
	...
>>>Mie^.ng co`n ho+i mu`i su+?a! Cho+' co' ba^`y 
>>>dda(.t!!!
------------------------------------------------

>
>Longan 
>
>P.S.  I wanna be a hyena, no dog.
>


	ba ca^u tra? lo*`i , cha('c anh cu~ng bie^'t 
	tu*` dda^u ra ro^`i. chu'ng du`ng dde^? gia?
	lo*`i anh, nghe cu~ng ho*.p ly' la('m !
	ki'nh thu*a anh longnguyen, trong ngo^n ngu*~ va(n minh
	loa`i cho' ngo^' co' ca'n, co' ca^u sau:
		"qua^~u gu*` oa(~ng, ca(ng gu*` ca(ng"
	kho?i ca^`n to^i di.ch sang tie^'ng ngu*o*`i la`:
		"ma~ ta^`m ma~, ngu*u* ta^`m ngu*a" bo*?i 
		the^' chu'ng binh nhau
	anh cu~ng hie^?u chu*' ?? :-)


best regard
	


=================================================================

> 
> 
> cha`o anh lyxuan

kimtrong@ocf,

> 
> to^i kho^ng da'm so sa'nh tri`nh ddo^. cu?a to^i
> vo*'i tri`nh ddo^. cu?a anh. khi ra ddu*o*`ng, bi.
> mo^.t con cho' ddie^n ru*o*.t theo ca('n su?a, to^i
> se bo? ddi chu*' kho^ng bo` xuo^'ng ba(`ng bo^'n
> cha^n dde^? su?a va` ca('n la.i !!

Theo nhu+ ca^.u no'i thi` to^i la` cho' ddie^n....
Va^.y thi` trong ba`i na^`y ca^.u dda? ddo'ng vai tro` gi`?

Va` khi ca^.u la`m ba`i "reply to lyxuan" thi` ca^.u dda? 
ddo'ng vai tro` gi`?

Ne^'u ca^.u ddo.c ba`i "re: hoa` ho+.p ho`a gia?i" ma` ca?m
tha^'y tu+. a'i vie^.c gi` thi` ca^.u cu+' no'i ra xem!!!

Trong ba`i "re: hoa` ho+.p ho`a gia?i" to^i dda? va cha.m gi` 
to+'i ca' nha^n ca^.u? Ha? !!???
Ca^.u co' pha?i tha`nh pha^`n "cho^'ng co^.ng cu+.c ddoan"
hay kho^ng ma` ca^.u pha?i tu+. ai' co+ chu+'???

Ne^'u ca^.u la` tha`nh pha^`n "cho^'ng co^.ng cu+.c ddoan" thi`
ca^.u ne^n ddi Ottawa ma` cho^'ng ddi! Ma` ca^.u la`m gi` ddu+o+.c
chu'ng???  Ca^.u ca('n ca(.c chu'ng a` ??

To^i chu+a bao gio+` mo+? mie^.ng xin ddo^`ng tie^`n hoa(.c ba't
ga.o cu?a ca^.u hoa(.c ba^'t cu+' mo^.t ai ca? Ma` ca^.u co' cho
to^i ddu+o+.c ba't co+m hay mie^'ng nu+o+'c chu+a?  Ma` gio+` na^`y
ca^.u muo^'n da.y ddo+`i to^i !?  Ca^.u cho' ma' vu+`a pha?i tho^i
nhe'....

Co' gi` to^i no'i kho^ng ddu'ng thi` ca^.u cu+' vie^.c ba('t be? !!!

Nhu+ng ne^n nho+', ne^'u ca^.u muo^'n chu+'ng minh to^i la^`m
la^?n thi` ye^u ca^`u ddu+a ra ly' pha?i....

> 
> to^i nghi? tri`nh ddo^. cu?a anh va` to^i kho^ng
> gio^'ng nhau, do ddo' to^i se ke^'t thu'c ca^u chuye^.n
> cho' ddie^n ta.i dda^y. rie^ng ve^` pha^`n ho.c va(n
> , anh ne^n ve^` nha` ho.c la.i ca^u :

Hmmmm....Ca^.u gio?i tha^.t!? Ca^.u tho^ng manh la('m!!

> 
> "ddi vo*'i bu.t ma(.c a'o ca` sa, ddi vo*'i ma ma(.c
> a'o gia^'y" chu*' kho^ng pha?i
> 
> "ddi vo*'i cha thi` ma(.c a'o dden, ddi vo*'i su* thi`
> ma(.c a'o ca` sa, vv ..." nhu* anh vu*`a no'i.
> 

Tre^n ddo+`i kho' ma` hie^?u ddu+o+.c nhau!! Xong ne^'u
no'i tra('ng dden ra thi` nhie^`u khi no' kho^ng ddu+o+.c 
hay ma^'y.  

Nhu+ng ma` ke^.

Y' to^i muo^'n no'i la` "su+ cha" ca^.u dda^'y!!

> chu'c anh ha.nh phu'c , vui ve?, va` so^'ng la^u !

Tru+` phi ca^.u gio?i ca('n ca(.c to^i a^'y.

HandsomeStranger

> 
> ===============================================================
> 
>> 
>> cha`o anh lyxuan.
> 
> kimtrong@ocf,
> 
>> 
>> vo*'i lo*`i le va` gio.ng ddie^.u trong ba`i vie^'t,
> 
> Cha('c ca^.u co' nghe qua " ddi vo+'i cha thi` ma(.c a'o dden, 
> ddi vo+'i su+ thi` ma(.c a'o ca` sa, vv........"
> 
> The^' thi` cho to^i ma.o muo^.i ho?i ca^.u mo^.t ca^u nhe'!?
> 
> Ca^.u la` tha`nh pha^`n gi` na`o?
> 
>> ngu*o*`i ddo.c co' the^? dda'nh gia' con ngu*o*`i va`
> 
> Ca^.u co' ddu? tu+ ca'ch dde^? dda'nh gia' to^i u+ ?
> 
>> tri`nh ddo^. cu?a anh. 
> 
> Tri`nh ddo^.??? Cu?a ca^.u ddo ddu+o+.c ma^'y gang ? No'i thu+? xem na`o!?
> 
>> to^i khuye^n anh ne^n ve^` nha` ho.c la.i ca^u "tie^n
> 
> Ca^.u bie^'t le^? nghi?a u+ ?  Mie^.ng co`n ho+i mu`i su+?a! Cho+' co' ba^`y
> dda(.t!!!
> 
>> ho.c le^, ha^.u ho.c va(n" cu?a o^ng ba` mi`nh.
>> 
> 
> Ca^.u ne^n ve^` ho.c va(n ddi.
> 
> HandsomeStranger
> 
> 
> -----------------lotta stuffs deleted---------------------------------------


Newsgroups: soc.culture.vietnamese