HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mckeeveb@monashee.sfu.ca (Gumby - The unknown user)
Subject: Re: Upgrading a ZyXEL 1496E to an E+
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 00:08:24 GMT

jack@sybil.jpl.nasa.gov (Jack Kobzeff) writes:

>In my conversation with a ZyXel rep, she said that there was no upgrade
>from a E to a E+. They said that the major changes are that the clock speed
>is higher and the EPROMS are larger. I reaaly didn't get into much detail.

If it was just that, then I could do it in my sleep!

I'm meeting with the guy who started this thread tommorrow to see what we can
find out.

-- 
    Rob McKeever  VE7ICJ  rmckeeve@sfu.ca  mckeeveb@sfu.ca  604-291-0457
"Do you know what standards are?  They're career paths for people who don't
 want to work!" - John Parkinson, Ernst & Young at the BCDMA Conference '92
       -*-          Standard Disclaimers should be adequate        -*-
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: dml7@navaho.cc.bellcore.com (lee,danny)
Subject: *** WHAT'S THE BEST COMM PROTOCOL ***
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 20:07:45 GMT

i'm having trouble deciding which communications protocol package to
use on my pc.  i was using kermit and still using it.  however,
someone mentioned to me that zmodem was much better and faster.
one can assume that speed and reliability are the main factors
to consider.  which one (kermit or zmodem, or any other ones)
would permit one to download/upload most efficiently and most
quickly?  obviously, modem speed plays a role as well.  please
e-mail me below or post.  i will summarize should there be enough
interest.  thanks in advance.

  ________/----------------------/______
 / Danny / dml7@cc.bellcore.com / 1992 /
/_______/----------------------/______/
From: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org (Christian Weisgerber)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: My Individual Private Site
Subject: Re: Bad Experience Seeking 2400 bps, v.42bis
Reply-To: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.10 Rev. Dec 18 1992
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 23:46:22 CET
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In <1992Dec22.082653.21470@ssc.com>, Tad Cook writes:

> The modem came the other day, and guess what?  Its really
> just a 2400 bps modem, but has small print below the V.42bis
> on the label that says "RPI compatible," meaning that you
> have to do your error correction and compression in
> software external to the modem!  I had heard of this before,
> but didn't know that Zoom was trying to pull this scam.

The guys pulling the scam are Rockwell International. They introduced
two single-chip modems, one for 2400bps, the other for 2400bps,
9600/4800 Send/ReceiveFax, that "support" MNP/V.42(bis) this way. Since
it is *very* cheap for a manufacturer to make a modem based on these
chips, I expect lots of them in the near future. You can be pretty sure
that they will not put a big sticker on saying "MNP/V.42(bis) only with
appropriate software". Let's see how they are going to provide a RPI
driver for my FACIT 4431 terminal (VT100 clone)... oops, looks like it
ain't the real thing.

I don't mind anybody defending Rockwell. Actually I'd like to hear some
serious arguments in favor of this solution. Until then... well, when I
first saw the chip described in a Rockwell catalog I knew what would
happen and I was pissed off. I still am.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber, Germany           naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: heiser@world.std.com
Subject: FAX Software
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 21:27:14 GMT

Can anyone recommend FAX software for the Hayes Optima 144?  I am evaluating
this unit, and the SmartcomFAX software bundled with it won't even work... I
can't even get it to send a fax (it returns an obscure error).

The modem seems to work well in modem mode, and I'd like to utilize the FAX
portion.

Thanks in advance.
Bill


-- 
 Bill Heiser   heiser@world.std.com
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Lempel Ziv algorithm (where can I get it?)
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 16:17:55 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

luca@dedalo.unipg.it (Luca Priorelli) writes:

> Is there an FTP site where I can get the C source code of Lempel
> Ziv compression algorithm?

   I have something which *claims* to be C source to perform Lempel-Ziv 
compression.  I am mailing you a copy, and will do so to a resonable number of 
people if they mail me with a request.  It is about 20K.

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Subject: Re: Telebit T1000 queston
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 20:38:48 GMT

Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org writes:
>
>The T1000 does PEP (with *no* compression and a 9600 bps max xfer rate)
>or runs like a decent 2400 bps modem with MNP. 
>
>I believe it supports:
>
>V22bis		2400 bps
>V22		1200 bps (European)
>???		300 bps (European)
>

V.21

>
>Bell 212A	1200 bps (US)
>Bell 103	300 bps (US)
>
>And it *may* be able to support the CCITT V.23(?) standard (that's the
>one with the 1200 bps/75 bps split send/receive rate.
>

Yes, that's V.23.  No, I'm afraid the T1000 doesn't support V.23.

-- 
:::::::::::::::::::  Greg Andrews  gerg@netcom.com  :::::::::::::::::::
ObDrieux:  MODERN PROBLEMS: Hi Diddle Diddle, The Cat and the Fiddle,
			    The Cow Blew Up on the Launching Pad
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
From: tener@cs.widener.edu (Stuart Tener)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Worldblazer/T-3000 question
Date: 24 Dec 1992 04:04:31 -0500
Organization: Widener University CS Department, Chester PA
NNTP-Posting-Host: pebbles.cs.widener.edu

I have been contemplating buying a new trailblazer for myself, and
upgrading a large number of clients. Can someone tell me if the
difference between the Worldblazer and the T-3000 is only a set of
eproms? Or are there any hardware differences. I was going to have my
customers buy T-3000s for now, and then upgrade them (via eprom) to
V.FAST when it comes out.

thanks,

stuart b. tener
tener@cs.widener.edu
(215)-338-6005
email is ok if you wish to respond that way.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.sys.sun.admin,cu.sun.managers
From: mmjjmm@post.its.mcw.edu (Michael Malloy)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: test
Date: 27 Dec 1992 18:13:53 -0600
Organization: Medical College of Wisconsin  (Milwaukee, WI)
NNTP-Posting-Host: post.its.mcw.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: phr@telebit.com (Paul Rubin)
Subject: Re: V32bis over _very_ noisy lines (HE
Organization: Telebit Corporation; Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 13:17:35 GMT

In article <pauln.723454011@nuustak> Paul Nash <paul@tantrum.csir.co.za> writes:

   Thus spake saff@ax.apc.org:

   > One of my users is having problem to connect to our T3000 with V32bis.
   > She is in the Amazon, and the phone lines are *very* noisy. They are using

   Throw the modems away and go for PEP.  It is the only thing that works
   reliably on *seriously* bad lines.

She doesn't need to throw the T3000's away, they can be upgraded
to PEP fairly inexpensively.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: wolfgang@netcom.com (Wolfgang Henke)
Subject: Re: 14.4K Modem Recommendations
Organization: Netcom
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 15:57:52 GMT

Tad Cook (tad@ssc.com) wrote:
: >Digicom at 1-800-858-7228 for pre-recorded information on the modem's
:             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: I tried calling THIS NUMBER and it is disconnected.

The correct number for Digicom Systems is 1-800-833-8900. Digicom is
closed until Monday, January 4, 1992.

Please do not post the Prodigy Eagle 800 number since it is solely
available for Prodigy members Eagle Technical Support. 

-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
   Wolfgang Henke     Data lanes not car pool lanes      wolfgang@netcom.com
From: leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Telebit T1000 queston
Date: 3 Jan 93 02:17:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: qiclab.1993Jan3.021720.25190
Reply-To: Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon.

geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh) writes:

>leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson) writes:

>> I believe it supports:
>> [...]
>> ???		300 bps (European)

>   I believe that this would be V.21, but my T1000 makes no mention of it.

Check the S90 switch in the Enhanced Command Mode section of the manual.

>> And it *may* be able to support the CCITT V.23(?) standard (that's the
>> one with the 1200 bps/75 bps split send/receive rate.

>   The manual also makes no mention of this.

I don't have a T1000 manual handy, but check S50 in the enhanced command
mode section.

I'm pretty sure that the Bell/CCITT switch is there, as the listing of
the config of a friends T1000 lists S90. Whether S50 will accept a 5
is a bit harder to check. :-)

-- 
Leonard Erickson		      leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com
CIS: [70465,203]			 70465.203@compuserve.com
FIDO:   1:105/51	 Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
(The CIS & Fido addresses are preferred)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Subject: Re: Telebit T1000 queston
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 18:17:46 GMT

GOODRIC@hsdwl.utc.com (Jim Goodrich) writes:
>
>Hi Netters,
>
>Does the Telebit T1000 use a propriety protocol or does it support
>the v.32/v.42 standards?  In other words, will it only talk to another
>Telebit T1000?
>

At high speed (9600), it will only communicate with another PEP modem.
That means any of several Telebit models: T1000, T2000, TrailBlazer Plus,
T2500, WorldBlazer, and TrailBlazer.  There were some PEP modems that
Telebit built for other companies: DCA Fastlink, Ven-Tel EC18K, Racal
Milgo RM1822.  These are equivalent to the TrailBlazer, and can talk to
a T1000 in the high speed PEP mode.

Other brands will be able to connect to a T1000, but only at 2400/1200/300
bps speeds.

-- 
:::::::::::::::::::  Greg Andrews  gerg@netcom.com  :::::::::::::::::::
ObGuindon:  Harriet Bover just found out from television that
            "Rust never sleeps."  Now she can't either.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
From: gallenba@igd.fhg.de (Jens Gallenbacher)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: RS 449 ?
Date: 29 Dec 92 13:44:13 GMT
Organization: Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, 6100 Darmstadt, Germany


Hi all,

I have a device with a RS 449 - interface. The output - drivers
are specified for RS 422.

Does anyone know, if I can put the RS 449 (with adaption of the
voltages) directly to a RS 232, what Baud - rates are possible
etc.

Thanks in advance,

Jens.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael Rosen)
Subject: Re: Uploading to Internet (was Re: PPI modems...)
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 93 20:46:17 GMT

clau@acs.ucalgary.ca (Christopher Lau) writes:

>> 
>> How would you do this in either Procomm Plus for Windows or Telix?

>you would specify this on the sending side: 

>unix %  sz -ber filename     ;(b forces binary mode, e forces quote ctrl char
>                               r turns on error recovery)

That doesn't answer the question.  The problem is with uploading, not
downloading.  I issue an rz on the unix end and nothing happens when I
try to use Procomm's upload function.  It's not just in Windows
either, I need to overcome the fact that I'm telnetting through a
couple sites...

Mike
--
Michael Rosen						"Time and space
Tau Epsilon Phi - George Washington University		 can be a bitch."
mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu					  -Quantum Leap
Michael.Rosen@bbs.oit.unc.edu or @lambada.oit.unc.edu
From: pcc@s1.gov (Philip C. Cox)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Getting T3000 & WB to talk
Date: 29 Dec 92 20:45:00 GMT
Reply-To: pcc@s1.gov
Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Originator: pcc@s1.gov


I am having a bunch of trouble getting a WB to talk with a T3000 for
UUCP & News feeds. Both systems seem to talk to others just fine, but
when talking to each other, just drop a bit here & there. If anyone has
these two talking, please e-mail me your register settings.

TIA,

Phil
-- 
***********************************************************************
* Philip C. Cox          |  L.L.N.L.                                  *
* E-Mail: pcc@s1.gov     |  P.O. Box 808 L-542                        *
* VOICE: (415) 423-8316  |  Livermore, CA 94550                       *
*=====================================================================*
*                      Line of the week :                             *
*                                                                     *
*  Remember what christmas is all about; Jesus is the reason for the  *
*  season.                                                            *
***********************************************************************
From: pdenize@waikato.ac.nz
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Problems with a Dynalink Modem
Date: 25 Dec 92 16:49:30 +1300
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

I have just bought a Dynalink 2400P modem 

My friend bought one at the same time, his works fine, mine is being a %&&&^%

There were several differences and we are not sure whether there is a
configuration problem, a hardware problem, or both. 

First the CD light on mine does not light up till it makes a connection (whilst
my friends comes on even when disconnected)

Then:

When we send the command AT&V the first line on my friends reads

ACTIVE PROFILE:
B0 E1 L2 M1 Q0 V1 X4 Y0 &C0 &D0 &G0 &J0 &L0 &P0 ...

while mine reads

ACTIVE PROFILE:
B0 E1 L2 M1 Q0 V1 X4 Y0 &C0 &D0 &G0 &J0 &L0 &Q0 ...
                                            ^^^

its the &C0... that we seem not to be able to configure.

Finally the modem dials the phone the other end rings twice then it aborts with
BUSY.  This was only solved by disabling the results codes.

Can anyone suggest what I do next?

mail to pdenize@waikato.ac.nz

Thanks in advance


Paul Denize

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Denize                                Internet: PDenize@Waikato.ac.nz
Department of Computer Science
University of Waikato                         phone: ++64 7 8562-889
Hamilton                                                          Ext 8743
NEW ZEALAND                                   fax  : ++64 7 8560-135
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: paul@NeoSoft.com (Paul Hutmacher)
Subject: Re: Could somebody tell me the quality of Zoom Modems?
Organization: Greater Montrose UFO Appreciation Society & Data Haven
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 02:42:37 GMT

In article <1992Dec28.221411.9228@ssc.com> tad@ssc.com (Tad Cook) writes:
>I have the external Zoom VFX, and it talks just fine to Practical Peripheral,
>Intel, Telebit, USR and a host of others at 14.4 kbps and beyond.

Ditto.  I've got the same one and it works fine.  This is my second time to
own a Zoom product and I have no complaints.

-- 
Paul Hutmacher     | "These things happen.  One day you run everything
paul@NeoSoft.Com   |  and the next day you run like a dog." -- HST
From: rlm@mcgort.com (Robert McMillin)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Telebit T1000 queston
Keywords: Telebit v.32 v.42 T1000
Date: 30 Dec 92 15:58:58 GMT
Distribution: all
Organization: Private Beta Site Research, Garden Grove, Calfornia

GOODRIC@hsdwl.utc.com (Jim Goodrich) writes:

> Does the Telebit T1000 use a propriety protocol or does it support
> the v.32/v.42 standards?  In other words, will it only talk to another
> Telebit T1000?


The T1000 only supports PEP as a high-speed transmission medium, unless
you consider 2400 bps high-speed.
From: duncan@ravel.ati.com (Jim Duncan)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: WB Fax Upgrade
Summary: EXPENSIVE UNIX fax software
Date: 1 Jan 93 03:55:03 GMT
Organization: K-FOX 94.5 Classic Rock (KUFX, Gilroy-San Jose, CA)

Yesterday I received the fax/ROM upgrades for my Worldblazer. The kit
basically adds fax capability and provides the latest v. 7.01 ROM's.

Over the weekend I plan to install the new parts, but the outstanding,
overriding bummer in the whole project is that the (presently) required
FAXIMUM software in the UNIX environment costs about $625 - they so
graciously give you a 10% discount off the $695 regular price. This is
very unacceptable.  

-- 
K-FOX|      w  ["]                            | WA6MBV      
94.5 |...   |___|_____..duncan@ravel.ati.com  | Jim Duncan  
KUFX |          H                             | 408.297.5977   
********  \_____I_____/  37 3 10N/121 59 10W  **************
From: chungh@armory.enet.dec.com (Henry Chung)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: AC Adapter for external Zoom 14.4K modem
Date: 29 Dec 92 06:29:11 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


Help ! External Zoom 14.4K modem owners:

I mixed up my AC adapter for the Zoom modem with another similar AC Adapter
Could someone look at his/her Zoom AC adapter cube and tell me 
the OUTPUT Voltage rating.  I have 1 with 12V DC output and another one 
with 10.2V AC.  (I checked the modem and the user's manual, but could not
find anything on the AC adapter). Thanks,
/Henry
From: merv@gpstwr.UUCP (Merv Graham)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re^2: HELP! problems with 2-line phones
Date: 29 Dec 92 19:20:19 GMT
Organization: Graham-Patten Sys., Inc., Grass Valley, CA


joel@writer.yorku.ca (Joel Atkin) writes:

>Help!  My supra v.32bis modem, which is billed as handling line noise
>fairly well, drops the carrier every time my other line rings.  I have
>5 two line phones hooked up throughout my house on sockets I've wired
>for two lines.  When I remove all of the phones, presto!, carrier is
>not dropped when the other line rings.  I have tried each phone
>individually and they all seem to cause line noise on the other line
>(line2) when line1 rings.  These phones are essential and I was
>wondering if there was some way to suppress this overlapping effect.

Some time ago this issue was covered in one of the many newsgroups I read.
One possible explanation and fix (albeit a cumbersome one) is this:
If your two lines to each RJ-14 jack are wired with common "QUAD" cable,
that is, the cable with single red, green, black, and yellow wires, you
have a good chance of having crosstalk between the two lines.
Common QUAD cable twists all four wires together while other "multipair"
cables twist each pair of wires (line) separately so inductive coupling
between the pairs is minimized.
The cable the the phone company runs from its central office to your
site is on such a cable (or other fancy electonic carriers), but just a
few feet of QUAD cable within your site can create enough crosstalk
between the two lines to garble the data going to a modem.
The high voltage ringing signal, in particular, can create
a substantial field.

I suspect in your case you had no problem when you disconnected all the
phones that might ring on the "second" line because with no phones
connected, there was no complete circuit hence the ringing signal
was not turned into any current, hence no inductive coupling was
generated to couple to your data line.

The fix may be to rewire your site with good twisted pair cable
(available through any phone supplier and its not very expensive),
or run a separate cable for your data line that is physically separated
from your "phone" lines by at least serveral inches throughout its run.
-- 
Merv Graham                 |     gpstwr!merv@gvgpsa.gvg.tek.com
Graham-Patten Systems, Inc. | or: tektronix!gvgpsa.gvg.tek.com!gpstwr!merv
P.O. Box 1960               | 
Grass Valley, CA 95945      | Ph: 916-273-8412   FAX: 916-273-7458
From: zeke@esosun.UUCP (James Dehnert)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Worldblazer/T-3000 question
Date: 31 Dec 92 00:21:28 GMT
Reply-To: zeke@esosun.css.gov.UUCP (James Dehnert)
Organization: Science Applications International Corp., San Diego

: Larry's question was *entirely* relevant to your article.  Telebit has
: never promised to support V.fast (when it's finished) in the
: WorldBlazer.

  At any rate, for what it's worth.  I called Telebit and asked them
about this a few months ago and was told that they do plan to offer an
upgrade to V.fast when it becomes a standard.  This was not an official
announcement of support, nor was it a promise of an inexpensive upgrade
path.  All that we can really surmise from this casual conversaton is
that Telebit will support the next major standard.  Which we all should
have assumed amyway.

  Happy New Year!!

    Zeke

-- 
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
= James "Zeke" Dehnert         zeke@mode.css.gov  =
+ SAIC   Geophysical Div.     Eschew Obfuscation  +
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
From: vmkiili@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Ville-Matti Kiili)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: How to raise the speed of connection on Supra?
Date: 1 Jan 93 16:27:52 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]


I'm using SupraFax V.32bis modem. It always connects this site 
at 9600bps. This is ok, because it's the highest supported speed
of this site. However, sometimes my modem lowers the speed 
because of line noise. Then the speed is 4800bps. How can I
raise the speed back to 9600bps? I don't want to force my
modem to maintain 9600bps always, but sometimes I want to transfer 
files and I'd like to use higher speed without hanging up and
dialing again. How could I do that?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
  Ville-Matti Kiili                                // Only Amiga makes 
  vmkiili@cc.helsinki.fi                         \X/  it impossible... 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: tad@ssc.com (Tad Cook)
Subject: Re: Could somebody tell me the quality of Zoom Modems?
Organization: very little
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 22:18:35 GMT

In article <1hlv76INNpah@crcnis1.unl.edu> vporguen@unlinfo.unl.edu (victor porguen) writes:
>matttrem@willard.UUCP (Matthew Trembley) writes:
>
>>I'm thinking of upgrading to a 14.4 Zoom modem with all the kinds of 
>>compression and correction(internal).  It also faxes.  It says that it
>>has 16550 UART and speeds up to 57,600 bps.
>>It is for sale for $219.  
>>Could someone tell me if this is a good deal and if the modem is of good 
>>quality?
>>Thanks in advance.
>
>Yes, I can tell you something about Zoom modems, although I certainly 
>haven't seen ALL of them. However, based on my experience with them,
>my advice would be to stay away from it. The modems have problems and
>it's not easy to reach their Tech Support OR their Warranty Service
>people - you always get an answering machine, it seems. 

I got voice mail when I called.  With these modems going for a little
over $200, they get a LOT of calls!


I didn't like
>that very much, nor did I like the problems that the modem itself was 
>having.
>
>
I just faxed them my query.  It always got through quickly, and they
called me back on THEIR nickle.


-- 
 Tad Cook     |  Phone:  206-527-4089  (home)     |   MCI Mail: 3288544   
 Seattle, WA  |  Packet: KT7H @ N7DUO.WA.USA.NA   |   3288544@mcimail.com 
              |  Internet: tad@ssc.com           or...sumax!ole!ssc!tad