HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mjb@acsu.buffalo.edu (Matthew J. Bernhardt)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: A sad day for America
Date: 5 Nov 92 23:33:23 GMT
Organization: UB

jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl) writes:

>That's not the half of it.  After Clinton is inagurated, Rush Limbaugh
>and all his fans will be first up against the wall in the ensuing
>Political Purifying of America!!

	Whew!  Sounds like you belong in Stalin's Russia.
-- 
Matt Bernhardt
University of Buffalo            If it is to be, it is up to me.
mjb@acsu.buffalo.edu
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: young@ssdd475a.erim.org (Peter Young)
Subject: Re: Gay marriage (was: The Difference Between Cs 
In-reply-to: jtinkle@sparc1.sparc1.csubak.edu's message of 8 Nov 92 19:52:23 PST
Organization: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Distribution: usa
Date: 9 Nov 92 12:41:50

In article <1992Nov8.195224.3102@nic.csu.net> jtinkle@sparc1.sparc1.csubak.edu (j. tinkle ) writes:
>   ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   Now that it's over, I've received 5:1 e-mail.  5 pro-Bush, isn't this great?
>   we're gonna win in '96 for sure! to each 1 pro-Clinton nyah.  In light of
>   this, I still don't understand how he got elected.
>   --------------------------------------------------

It seems pretty obvious to me, Jennifer.  The Bush people clearly feel
that all they have to do is sit back and wait and it will come to
them, kind of like The Bush person did this year.  We have evidence
that this does not win elections.

>   mandate, v.  Democrats saying, "All right! It's ours again! Let's SCREW 'EM!!"

The only sentiment for "let's screw 'em" that I've seen here has been
from the forces of the Right saying they will do everything in their
power to prevent re-election of Clinton even before the man has spent
his first hour as Commander-in-Chief.  So "please get out of the new
road if ya can't lend a hand..."

Peter
--
Peter Young
young@erim.org
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:9662 talk.rumors:1273 alt.activism:18762 alt.politics.elections:23759 talk.politics.misc:60087
From: Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
X-Xxdate: Fri, 13 Nov 92 15:34:56 GMT
Organization: Lockheed Engineering & Sciences Company
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 21:38:16 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.203851.15344@EE.Stanford.EDU> David Budd,
budd@playfair.Stanford.EDU writes:
>and on and on.
>This, of course, doesn't even include the outright rudeness
>of liberals who prevent conservative speakers from being heard
>by showing up at public events and shouting down the speaker with
>megaphones.

Don't be hypocritical...  There were many instances in the campaign where
the republicans used this same tactic. I am not saying it is right, but
it is not an exclusive tactic of either side.

Norman

Dr. Norman J. LaFave
Senior Engineer
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company




When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
                               Hunter Thompson
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.elections
From: steve@uswmrg.mrg.uswest.com (Steven Martin)
Subject: Re: President Clinton
XXXDate: Thu, 5 Nov 92 21:41:47 GMT
XUserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
XXXMessageID: <A71EE32B09010642@steve_martin.mrg.uswest.com>
Organization: U S WEST, MRG
NntpPostingHost: steve_martin.mrg.uswest.com
Distribution: usa
Date: 05 Nov 92 21:48:46 GMT

In article <Bx898r.5rD@xcluud.sccsi.com> Glynne Tolar, gtolar@xcluud.sccsi.com
writes:
>>>OH *MY* **GOD**!!  God save us from Socialism.
>>>________
>>>Jennifer|
>>>
>>
>>Once you pay taxes, you're a teenyweeny bit closer to socialism!!!
>>So, unless you're cheating with taxes, you're a flamin' commie!!!!!
>>Oh, my God! Now, Clinton  tomorrow ??? Stalin??? Ceacescu????????
>>Seriously, are you sure you'd know Socialism if it stood right in
>>front of you yelling, "HEY! YO! LOOK AT ME!!!"? I'm not.
>>
>>Twelve years too late, but not a second too soon!...
>>

I guess what really irritates me about the socialist faction is that
they all agree that they want more from their government, but they 
want the hard working folks like myself to pay for it. Lends credance
to the slogan: "Vote Democratic: It's easier than working!"



>I take it you like more government!  Why do you think our country is in
>debt in the first place.  I know, you'll do what many do, blame it on the
>republicans.  Check the constitution and see who has the power over the
>budget, congress.  Hmmm? An idea crossed my mind.  I think when Clinton gets
>in office I'll mail him a copy of the constitution.  It may be the first time
>he's seen it!

I agree. It seems unlikely that Slick has read any of the U S Constitution
and certainly not any of the Bill of Rights. I suspect that Chief Justice
Rehnquist will need to ask him if he has heard of the Constitution before
he swears him in. And this is the man who is going to preserve and protect
the Constitution!

And that is on the Domestic side, we have to shudder over his knowledge of
Foreign Policy.

Dangerous times indeed.


        Steve Martin
        steve@uswmrg.mrg.uswest.com

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and
 bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against 
 tyranny in government."  Thomas Jefferson
From: leffel@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Christopher J Leffel)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Clinton's promises
Date: 10 Nov 1992 19:00:25 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: leffel@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: leffel@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

From article <1992Nov9.161838.4880@math.ucla.edu>, by pugh@pico.math.ucla.edu (David Pugh):
> In article <9170@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> dejst5+@pitt.edu (David   E Joslin)
> writes:
>>I caught Rush's TV show last night.  He has promised to compile all of
>>Clinton's campaign promises and keep track of which ones are broken.
>>This would be a good thing to do, if it were done fairly.
>>
>>David
> 
> A pleniforus plenitude of Dittos to all readers
> 
> Much as I admire Rush I find what he is doing here a little hypocritical.
> It's all very well keeping track of Clinton promises but what about
> George Bush's 'Read My Lips. No New Taxes' ? My point being why didn't
> Rush do the same thing for Bush?

Well, it doesn't make much sense to bash a cannidate you like...  and with
Bush not really having a good chance to get back into office...  Why kick a
man when he is down?

> The fact is, I don't think there has EVER been a politician ANYWHERE
> who has kept every single promise. They can't because things occur that
> cannot be foreseen.

True, but I believe what rush is trying to do is help people see through all
the polish of the Clinton/Clinton oops Clinton/Gore team, and show that they
are really gilded cannidates...  Really shiny and slick looking on the
outside, and really rotten underneath...

> So I find this Rush thing rather IMMATURE.

Maybe, but his job is not be be mature it is to be entertaining...


-- 
-------------------------leffel@csd4.csd.uwm.edu--------------------------
"Don't you try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my
breakfast cereal."    -The Restaurant at the End of the Universe-

Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: jacksonk@polaris.cs.rpi.edu (Keith Jackson)
Subject: Re: Rush is such a bad loser
Organization: Rictteneyc Pohanetsrus Ilnlisete
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 23:18:36 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.033805.5554@news.ysu.edu> ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) writes:

>In a previous article, edcrwfrd@unlv.edu (Edward Crawford) says:


>>You said the people have spoken clearly? Hmm I hope you are
>>right.... since 60% of them voted against Clinton.

>You know, this is about the 50th time I've seen this statistic.

>56% of the vote went against Clinton.

>But 63% of the vote went against Bush, and 81% of the vote went against
>Perot.

>Now let's forget it, and get on with the business of rebuilding our country.

But we can't let him forget it!  Not when we hear the "mandate" and
"landslide" speeches on TV as precursors to radical proposals.  The basis
of the Perot campaign, also, should not be forgotten.  All these things
that are wrong with the economy (and other things) don't go away just
because Will-billy get's elected (though the popular media already seems to
act this way -- WHAT A MIRACLE! GASP!)  Clinton himself complained about
how "horrible" things are.  Well, Bill, we're waiting to see what you can
do.

AND REMEMBER

	     __  ______ __  __ ______ __  __ 
	    (( \ | || | \\  // | || | \\  // 
	     \\    ||    >><<    ||    \\//  
	    \_)) |_||_| //  \\   ||     ||   
	____   ____ ____    ____   ____ __  __ ______ 
	|| \\ ||    || \\  //  \\ ||    ||\ || | || | 
	||_// ||==  ||_// ((      ||==  ||\\||   ||   
	||    ||___ || \\  \\__// ||___ || \||   ||   
	    __  __   ___   ______  ____ ____   
	    ||  ||  // \\  | || | ||    || \\  
	    \\  // ((   ))   ||   ||==  ||  )) 
	     \\//   \\_//    ||   ||___ ||_//  
		 ____         ______ __  __  __  ______ 
	  /\    //  \\   /\   | || | ||\ || (( \ | || | 
	 //\\  ((  ___  //\\    ||   ||\\||  \\    ||   
	//--\\  \\__|| //--\\ |_||_| || \|| \_))   ||   
		__  __   ___   __  __ || 
		\\  //  // \\  ||  || || 
		 \\//  ((   )) ||  ||    
		  ||    \\_//  \\__// [] 


DO NOT LET HIM FORGET THIS!!!!
(or the fact that he promised to put in a Kosher kitchen in the White
House)

>*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  //  Religion: Society's First    *
>*  /\  the KelleyMan:Kelley L. Miller  // Fully Functional Informational *    
>* /__\             ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  // and Emotional Virus...          *
>****************Know God...No peace.  No God...Know peace.****************

Gee, how tolerant of you!  NOT!  (BTW, I'm not religious, I just don't feel
the need to criticize those who are by loudly exclaiming my viewpoints.)
But at least you didn't put something like "Jesus is the only path to
salvation" in your .sig, that would have been unforgivably intolerant and
typically right-winged.  Sheesh!  What a case!
-- 
__ __  ____ ______ ______ __  __ 	Keith Jackson
|| // ||    | || | | || | ||  ||
||<<  ||==    ||     ||   ||==||	jacksonk@cs.rpi.edu
|| \\ ||___ |_||_|   ||   ||  ||
From: steve@celia.UUCP (Steve Tyree)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: President Clinton
Date: 6 Nov 92 01:19:52 GMT
Reply-To: celia!steve@usc.edu (Steve Tyree)
Organization: Rhythm & Hues, Inc., Hollywood

In article <1992Nov4.042540.2028@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:
>O.K.  I am possibly (arguably) the most conservative regular poster 
>to this group.  It is time to give President Clinton a chance to make 
>his policies work.  Please, let's not bash him for campaign promisses, 
>let's wait and see how his policies work.  

 I agree with your basic ideal, however after the Great Media Blitzkrieg of 
1992 and the recent confession of a Clinton Campaign Director lying to the
media throughout the election, we need to precede with great caution.
Its very possible that many mistakes he makes will be hidden or covered
up with the usual media bias. That is were Rush comes in. He is standing
on that tank, abating a last ditch coup attempt by the nationalist social-
list. It is possible that Clinton really wants to change the Old Democratic
Party and make it more modern (ie- understand capitalism), but remember his
slickness. Clinton might be the Gorbachov of the U.S. Democratic Party.
We might even here him say "I still think Liberalism can work". Or have we
already....

 Steve Tyree - These opinions are mine and mine alone.
From: eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: INDEPENDENT HOUSE SPEAKER
Date: 11 Nov 92 15:59:17 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

An interesting idea came froM
patm@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Pat Murphy):
%		just thought i'd start a thread to see if
%anyone here is for an INDEPENDENT SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE.
%
%		all this talk about change change change from
%both sides of the aisle looks like it'll end up being just
%that-- talk (see, e.g., tom "worried-bout-those-freshmen"
%foley holding those get-togethers with all newly elected
%reps... you can bet your bottom dollar he wants to
%maintain the status quo).
%
%		i think one way in which to institute
%change (or at least start down the right path) is for 
%the house to elect an INDEPENDENT SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE.
%someone who is beholden to no one...
%
%		any suggestions?  contact your local
%representative (especially those who are new) and tell
%them to change!

What about that Socialist from Vermont(?)? That would definitely be an
interesting change!
-- 
Emil Thomas Chuck	eyc@acpub.duke.edu	Biomedical Engineering 1993
	THANK GOD IT'S BASKETBALL SEASON!!!!!
I don't have to have a 4.0 GPA to succeed in life because I'm 
good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: rickertj@athena.cas.vanderbilt.edu (John Rickert)
Subject: Re: God Help Us All! (mutter, mutter,) Amen!
Organization: Vanderbilt University Mathematics Department
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 04:52:20 GMT

In article <grendel.720903878@camelot> grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:
>In <1992Nov4.182120.27689@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> tcanham@kilroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Tim Canham) writes:
>
>>>George Washington has probably turned over in his grave.
>
>George Washington is DEAD.


   So is John Kennedy.  So is Martin Luther King.  What's the point?


>If he were ever to have turned over, he would have started doing so
>a long, long time ago, probably about the time that blacks were allowed
>to vote for the President.


   "The scheme, my dear marquis, which you propose as a precedent, to
encourage the emancipation of the black people of this Country from
that state of bondage in which they are held, is a striking evidence
of the benevolence of your Heart.  I shall be happy to join you in so
laudable a work."
			 -- George Washington to Marquis Lafayette,
			    April 5, 1783

   "I hope it will not be conceived from these observations, that it
is my wish to hold the unhappy people, who are the subject of this letter,
in slavery.  I can only say that there is not a man living who wishes
more sincerely than I do, to see a plan adopted for the abolition of it."

			 -- George Washington to Robert Morris,
			    April 12, 1786

   Your insinuations against Washington are as groundless as they
are snide.


>>The Israelites asked for a king, and God gave them Saul.
>
>Oh, you fucking ignorant reeking self-righteous factory of piety, shut
>yer yawning yap and go sulk in the corner.  It's assholes like you that
>demonstrate the hypocrisy of conservatives when they equate liberals
>with extremism.


   I thought liberals were supposed to be open-minded and caring.  "I
don't hear any love here," if I may say so.  It is just such vituperation,
which seems to be habitual with some of your bent, that increases my
conservatism.  


John Rickert					
rickertj@athena.cas.vanderbilt.edu


Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: gorney@picard.med.ge.com (Felix Gorney Mfg 4-6983)
Subject: Re: Rush's Future...
Organization: GE Medical Systems, Magnetic Resonance
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 08:36:28 GMT


"Slick Willie" promised everything to everybody. Welfare, healthcare, airfare,
cabfare, you name it, he promised it. It is Rush's solemn duty to inform the
voting public, when Slick doesn't uphold his promises. Also, sinse Slick ran
as a moderate, it is also Rush's duty to keep an eye out for situations that
prove that Slick is not the person he said he was. As I'm sure these 2 issues
alone could take up hundreds of hours of air time, I'm sure Rush has his work
cut out for him.


Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:9126 alt.rush-limbaugh:9127
From: johna@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (john.a.welsh)
Subject: Some good reading from a columnist
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 15:19:09 GMT
Keywords: Mike Royko, good writing

I have been a little disappointed with Mike Royko during the campaign
because of his liberal stance.  I had a feeling that he would return to
the style of writing that I like so much from him as soon as it was
over, and I was correct.  Please read "IT WILL BE A LONG WALK FOR GEORGE"
and "HAIL TO THE CHIEF, DON'T COUNT ON IT".  For those with clarinet
feeds, they are in clari.features.mike_royko, for those without,
check your local newspaper or the Chicago Tribune.

In LONG WALK, Bush finds a genie in a bottle and wishes for everything
that has happened that looked so good for him, but when he asks for
a landslide victory, that's no. 11, and genies only give 10 wishes.

In HAIL Mike's mythical friend Slats Grobnick tells what's wrong
with the country.  If anybody said what Slats says, they would
be thrown off of the ballots, but they would be really truthful (and
a Republican would be just about shot by the media).  Imagine the
reaction to saying that it is your fault if you don't learn in
school or suggesting that those with no job or a prospect of one
having to go to school with your kid(s) to help keep them in line.

These are just very brief summaries of these two columns.  Please
try to find them and read them, I think you will enjoy his style
To really get into his characters, read some more of his columns,
but PLEASE, ditto-heads, not from the recent campaign.

I find Mr. Royko's writing very entertaining and well thought out
as long as he is not spouting liberalism.  He is like Rush in one
respect, do something stupid and he will give it to you from both
barrels (especially if you should know better, and are an elected
or appointed official).  Good reading!

                           John Welsh
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:9210 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8136
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: The Limbaugh-Clinton Constant
From: kmitche@eis.calstate.edu (Kenneth Mitchell)
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 09:48:21 GMT
Organization: Calif State Univ/Electronic Information Services

nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle) writes:
> aaiken@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Andrew C. Aiken) writes:
> >       Over the next four years, I will test the following hypothesis:
> 
> >(Rush Limbaugh's weight) + (Bill Clinton's weight) = constant
> 
>     That's an interesting hypothesis, but I'd be willing to bet a quarter 
> that it won't hold up without some "multi-cultural fudge factors". For 
> example, I would propose that Clinton should be handicapped 15 pounds 
> to counterbalance the effects of ham-hocks and fried chicken. Rush should 
> probably receive some sort of dispensation too (for being born in the "Bran 
> Belt"). I also think you should seek an NSF grant to cover any expenses 
> that arise during your research... 
> 
> --
> Nathan Engle                        Software Juggler
> Psychology Department               Indiana University
> nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu      nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu

No problem, Nate; during the New York primaries, Slick Willie promised to
keep a kosher kichen if elected. The ham hocks are OUT! 

Ken Mitchell
kmitche@eis.calstate.edu

Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:9524 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8453
From: cdpert01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Is Rush on in Canada?
Date: 12 Nov 92 14:41:54 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville


     Are there any "EIB affiliates" in Canada that carry Rush's radio
show?  It doesn't seem that his show fits within the guidelines of
political balance mandated by Canadian broadcast regulations....

     C. Perttunen
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: dash@skyy.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (O.P.P)
Subject: Re: Clinton's promises
Reply-To: dash@skyy.b30.ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 16:29:35 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.161838.4880@math.ucla.edu>, pugh@pico.math.ucla.edu (David Pugh) writes:
|> In article <9170@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> dejst5+@pitt.edu (David   E Joslin)
|> writes:
|> 
|> A pleniforus plenitude of Dittos to all readers
|> 
|> Much as I admire Rush I find what he is doing here a little hypocritical.
|> It's all very well keeping track of Clinton promises but what about
|> George Bush's 'Read My Lips. No New Taxes' ? My point being why didn't
|> Rush do the same thing for Bush?

That's nothing compared to the verbal somersaults RUSH performed on the
11-10-92 show.  In that show, in remarking about George Bush knowing about
the arms for hostages, Rush made the statement, "SO what! arms for
hostages were not illegal, bad foreign policy maybe, but not illegal".

Now this is from the man who almost ruptured his spleen talking about
Bill Clinton and his account of the draft, and how trust and character
should be taken into account.  George Bush has been proven to be a LIAR about
things that happened 4-5 years ago, let alone 20.

I noticed that George Bush said "Yeah, I was at the meeting, but I didn't
know anything about diverting money to the contras!"

Uh George, you are revising your story. You said, "I was out of the loop
on the arms for hostages thing." Not only was he at the meeting, he was
in favor of the deal. 

It seems Bob Dole wants to investigate the special investigator. His complaint,
"Why couldn't WALSH divulge this information the DAY AFTER the election."

Apparently, DOLE is upset that the truth was revealed.

It takes real b***s to campaign on TRUTH, TRUST and character, knowing
full well all the skeletons that are leaking out of one's own closet.


                                    O.P.P
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:9649 talk.abortion:47850
From: regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: rights and responsibilities
Keywords: abortion, slavery
Date: 14 Nov 92 00:08:25 GMT
Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdde.sdd.hp.com

In article <1992Nov13.193843.4750@panix.com> jk@panix.com (Jim Kalb) writes:
>(me)
>>When society-at-large can offer an alternative...
>>and will make certain assumptions about behavior if the alternative is not
>>utilized.  And society-at-large can and will make laws based upon the 
>>behaviors -- when an alternative is available.

>I don't think it's that easy to give a 5-year-old child up for
>adoption.  So if the parents find that they're tired of the whole
>thing after 5 years and want to call it quits, and can't find anyone
>who's willing to take the kid off their hands, should they have the
>right to abandon the kid?

That's the wrong question, Jim.

The question is, IF private parties decide to do things about their own
lives, does Society have the right to step in if it doesn't offer an alter-
native?

Society *must* provide viable alternatives in order to enforce certain laws.
If it doesn't, folks simply step outside the society, and voila, get what
they want.  Plus society folds.

That's *why* alternatives are generated.  Without them, we are all savages,
and we are all on our own.

Adrienne Regard
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: young@ssdd475a.erim.org (Peter Young)
Subject: Re: God Help Us All! (mutter, mutter,) Amen!
In-reply-to: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu's message of 9 Nov 92 05:06:50 GMT
Organization: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
	<1dhu7nINNl06@spool.mu.edu> <6815@news.duke.edu>
	<grendel.721285610@camelot>
Distribution: usa
Date: 9 Nov 92 12:48:23

All this talk about whether Clarence Thomas is right or left and that
the court should be balanced is total nonsense.  There is no written
rule that demands a balance.  The president's job is to pack as much
of his philosophy into the court as he possibly can, with the youngest
jurors that will be accepted so they will continue for as long as
possible.  The problem with Thomas is that he is either NOT a legal
scholar or a liar.  His claim that he never considered Roe vs Wade,
probably the most controversial court decision of our time, says he
either does not care enough for the law to sit on the Court, or that
he does not have the integrity to sit on the Court.  You decide.

Peter
--
Peter Young
young@erim.org
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh