HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams)
Subject: Re: The Engaged Psychobitch from Hell Syndrome
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 17:06:12 GMT

In <1992Sep27.050422.19339@leland.Stanford.EDU> richwing@leland.Stanford.EDU (Rich Wingerter) writes:

>In article <ewillims.717173729@unix1.tcd.ie>, ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>|> How can anyone be "seriously committed" to a relationship and NOT be 
>|> monogamous?  

>If you aren't seriously committed to all of your relationships, you are wasting
>a lot of people's time.  All you have to do is show up for each of the
>relationships you have.  When you're at work, you do work things; when you are
>shopping, you shop.

	Oh C'mon!  We're splitting hairs here!  Yes, of course, I'm
committed to my relationships with my friends and family and cats!:)
But we are talking about life-long commitment with a mate here.....
would you be seriously committed to a brief fling with a girl/boy
who you never intended to date for any length of time?
 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: rthoff@esk.compserv.utas.edu.au (Rudolph van't Hoff)
Subject: Re: Help, What Is Wrong With ME?(I'M NEW)
Organization: University of Tasmania at Launceston
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 07:53:17 GMT

Well, since I have received a lot of flack over this article, I suppose I had
better set everyone in the right direction!

I did say it quite clearly that:
		I am 19, and have been single for the past 3 to 4 years......etc
		       ^
look a comma, I think that means pause!!!!!! and add comment after!!!!!!!!

Well anyway I'm sure you are all just having a bit of fun!!!!! I know I am!

Ummm, is there anyone out there that wants a serious relationship with a 
grammaticly stupid, but incredibly well mannered and self catered for guy!

people of the Female sex, need only apply.

Not that I am discriminating homosexuals!

Bye all,

please mail me about the above!

Rudolph...................................

-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Scratch 'N' Sniff Section...|%% All return mail to:= The Phantom Mailer     %%% Scratch here - %&%&%&%&%&%& |%% rthoff@esk.compserv.utas.edu.au             %%
%                &%&%&%&%&%&% |%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%                %&%&%&%&%&%& |%% If the flavour fits, then sniff it......... %%%                &%&%&%&%&%&% |%% My systems Operator, who will remain anon   %%
% And remember a new flavour  |%% has said I'm naughty for having a large sig.%%% every week, guess this weeks|%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% and win the major prize.....|%% "Don't blame me, it wasn't me it was him..."%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow)
Subject: Re: Boston Boink - Highlights
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 04:12:03 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Keywords: Hairless Wonder, Police, Bananas, Salutes
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <thurlow.717519438@convex.convex.com> thurlow@convex.com (Robert Thurlow) writes:

>Rob Thurlow, Networking Technical Leader
>Convex Computer Corporation, Richardson, TX
>(214) 497-4405

Shit.  I hate it when I forget to change signature files on the weekend.

Rob T
--
Rob Thurlow, thurlow@convex.com
Across the evening sky, all the birds are leaving
But how can they know it's time for them to go?		- Sandy Denny
From: jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re:  Embarrasment of the Day
Date: 30 Sep 92 15:19:05 GMT
Organization: University of Waterloo

In article <1992Sep26.192829.12348@morrow.stanford.edu> mlw@cisco.com (Monica Waldman) writes:

>Wrong.  There are plenty of men who like women whose butts and the rest of them
>are not rail thin.

	And women who don't run screaming at the sight of a male who looks
like a fireplug with a beard. Thank God.

	No idea why I look the way I do. Most of my immediate family is
so thin, their girlfriends get papercuts whenever they kiss.

								James Nicoll
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Open letter to Edward V. Wright
Date: 30 Sep 1992 18:13:32 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Sep30.170701.1568@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>I'm not going to try to argue your concepts of the value (or lack
>thereof) of physical fitness or of your claims of the odds against your
>ever finding a suitable mate; I'm sure that no matter what I said, you
>could come up with some grammatical foible, some out-of-context quote,
>some assertion unrelated to anything I'd ever said, that you could focus
>on and defeat in your own mind, convincing yourself once again through
>volume and repetition that you are 100% right, reassuringly blinded from
>any alternate viewpoints or evidence that doesn't fit your set-in-stone
>absolute and unchanging view of the world.

Yes!  I don't believe it!  You actually did it.

We've just witnessed the very first 100 word sentence in the history of
computer networking.

This is truly incredible.  Folks, I though I'd never see the day the 100
barrier would be broken.  What stamina this must require!
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: First Lady?
Date: 26 Sep 92 21:07:26 GMT
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: GCTHORNE@idbsu.idbsu.edu's message of 26 Sep 92 18:03:36 GMT

Gee, I kinda hate to say it, but I really rather *liked* that poem.
--
Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am he who walks the States with a barb'd tongue, questioning every
one I meet,/Who are you that wanted only to be told what you knew
before?/ Who are you that wanted only a book to join you in your
nonsense?"  _Leaves of Grass_ xxiii.4.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: hays@TECHNET.NM.ORG (Larry 'Purple' Hays)
Subject: Re: Adventure on the docks
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 00:35:18 GMT
Organization: New Mexico Technet   Albuquerque, NM
Reply-To: hays@TECHNET.NM.ORG

In article <1992Sep24.025940.4982@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>, mel@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu (Meloney D Cregor) writes:
>In article <14740@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>
>>WELCOME BACK MEL!!!!
>>
>>We missed you.

Didn't we indeed.

>So, what's the scoop with the Balloonboink?  All I know is I have this
>plane ticket over on the bookcase and Larrybabe 

Larrybabe.  I like that.  Somebody tip this woman!

>want's me to get up
>at some ungodly hour......

Not neccesarily.  You don't hafta get up early.  You got lotsa options:
You can stay up all night (a personal fave) or you can miss the mass ascension
(also a personal fave, but not recommended if you've never seen one.)

Besides, it's only 5:30 (0530 for you milifolk and the truly nerdy....)

>I recently got back from the roadtrip from hell.  Ya know, it's

Didja say 'hi' to Elvis?  How is he?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Larry 'Purple' Hays                                      hays@technet.nm.org

        "I'm just a hunka' hunka' burnin' love. . ."   - E. Presley

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: men in their thirties who never dated
Date: 30 Sep 92 19:50:30 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <g+-pky_@lynx.unm.edu> blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:

>Walking a dog or mowing a lawn does not increase ones heart rate to the
>necessary levels required.

Of course not, since there are no "necessary levels required."

Here's another example of what you call "ignorance."  Dr. Henry Solomon, 
professor of cardiology at Cornell University, says, "You must be 
truly sedentary -- a slug who sits or lies about all day, or barely
crawls from bed to breakfast, to car and dsek and back again, to
be at any risk from inactivity.  No one who has to push a vaccum
cleaner, play bll with the children, or kep the lawn mowed is that
inactive."  Dr. Solomon, a *heart* expert, says that a daily one-
mile walk at leisurely pace, or the equivalent, is all the exercise 
the average American requires.

A group of epidemiologists studying exercise at the University of 
Pittsburgh reported in "The Physician and Sports Medicine" that 
"gardening three times a week is as effective as running for preventing
heart attack."

In fact, surveys show that walking is THE exercise recommended
most often by physicians.  Not running, not weightlifting, not
any of the trendy yuppy things they do down at the gym.  Walking.

Why?  Dr. Fred Stutman wrote in his book, "Walk, Don't Die," that
"Calisthenics cripple by breaking bones, pulling muscles, stretching 
ligaments, and ripping tendons.  Aerobic dancing damages feet, ankles, 
knees, and spines by pneumatic-drill type bouncing... as far as I'm 
concerned, aerobics are awful and calisthenics are crazy."

>Your attitudes towards fitness and exercise are >totally< fucked. There just
>simply is no other way to describe it. I've never seen anybody in my entire
>life display (publically) such a totally ignorant attitude. Amazing.

>Edward- read a book on medicine. Talk to a doctor about fitness. Get a clue.

Well, it's obvious how many doctors you've spoken to.  The claims 
you are parotting generally come from "fitness experts" such as 
President Bush's fitness czar, Arnold Schwartzenegger, not from
real doctors. 


>ps- disclaimer notice- these opinions are mine, not necessarily UNMs, so don't
>get any idea that they might be.

Oh, so you're acknowleding that the university you're affiliated
with doesn't agree with your claims, either?
From: eleanor@cbnews.cb.att.com (eleanor.j.evans)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: BARBIE DOES IT AGAIN!!!!
Date: 30 Sep 92 19:24:53 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Sep30.180924.17599@cbfsb.cb.att.com> joni@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (joni.dunlap) writes:
>I got this from soc.women. Mattel really did it this time It is bad enough
>that Barbie instills an unattainable body image to our little girls now
>they are now reinforcing fear of math.
>
>
>     According to the Wall Street Journal this morning, Mattel is selling
>     a product called "Teen Talk Barbie" which says 4 phrases.  One of the 
>     phrases is "Math class is hard".  I can't imagine a product better
>     designed to program math avoidance into little girls.  We've all heard
>     many times how math avoidance limits women's educational opportunities
>     and career choices.  Mattel justifies this product by saying something
>     like they aren't saying the other classes are easy, and that they have
>     a doll availble that says "I want to be a doctor".  I'm sure we all
>     wish Barbie good luck on achieving her goal of becoming a doctor
>     without any math skills.  If you have views on this subject that
>     you would like to share with the Mattel company, you can call
>     1-800-421-2887 or write to Mattel at 330 Continental Blvd.,
>     El Secundo, Ca. 90245.
>
Thanks for posting that, Joni.  I called--the nice woman said,
"We agree with you completely.  I'll add you to our list of complaints.
Thank you very much for calling."  So, what I want to know is, who's
"we"??

Oh, btw, I said, "I'm calling about the Teen Talk Barbie.  I am 
shocked and appalled that one of her phrases is "Math class is hard".
This is a terrible role model for young girls.  Thye have a hard
enough time <er, ehm, I'm starting to forget what I said--something
about...> getting a good education without this sort of example..."
or something like that....

Piglet
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: men in their thirties who never dated
Date: 28 Sep 92 14:56:16 GMT
	<MARTINC.92Sep25224245@grover.cs.unc.edu> <Bv9rBx.E76@unccsun.uncc.edu>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: goodrum@unccsun.uncc.edu's message of 28 Sep 92 03:35:56 GMT

In article <Bv9rBx.E76@unccsun.uncc.edu> goodrum@unccsun.uncc.edu (Cloyd Goodrum) writes:

   In article <MARTINC.92Sep25224245@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
   >self-esteem is significantly hindered by my lack of physical acumen?
   >
   >Just for the record: I'm not only good-looking, I'm smart.
   >--

	   Me too!! And plus, I'm humble!

Yeah, that too.
--
Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am he who walks the States with a barb'd tongue, questioning every
one I meet,/Who are you that wanted only to be told what you knew
before?/ Who are you that wanted only a book to join you in your
nonsense?"  _Leaves of Grass_ xxiii.4.
From: martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Humans as Physical Creatures.
Date: 3 Oct 92 17:52:30 GMT
	<1992Oct1.171835.5640@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com>
	<1992Oct2.115332.11796@access.digex.com>
	<MARTINC.92Oct2122534@grover.cs.unc.edu>
	<ewright.718070465@convex.convex.com>
Organization: UNC Department of Computer Science
In-reply-to: ewright@convex.com's message of 3 Oct 92 00:01:05 GMT

In article <ewright.718070465@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:

   In <MARTINC.92Oct2122534@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

   >Serious, I've read at least a few suggestions that Neanderthals and
   >Cromagnons were a single interbreeding and that the Neanderthals didn't
   >so much become extinct as be absorbed.  

   That's true.  The old view of Neanderthal Man (that is, the one
   you still see in bad science-fiction movies) was based on some
   skeletons that were badly reconstructed.  The anthropologists
   who worked on them failed to account for the fact that the bones
   were distorted by severe arthritis.  The modern view of is that
   you can only distinguish between Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon man
   on a statistical basis.  If you found a Neanderthal Man, dressed
   him and shaved him, he probably wouldn't attract a second notice
   on the street.  Most of us probably have some Neanderthal genes
   in us today.

   >Maybe agriculture was too tempting.... 

   Why are you so sure it wasn't the other way around?

I'm not.  But the pop-science article I'm remembering also suggested
pretty strongly that Neanderthals were apparently hunter-gatherers.  If
they dissapeared 40K years ago, that's be at the *very* beginnings of
agriculture, if anything.
--
Charles R. Martin/(Charlie)/martinc@cs.unc.edu/(ne crm@cs.duke.edu) 
O/Dept. of Computer Science/CB #3175 UNC-CH/Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3175
H/3611 University Dr #13M/Durham, NC 27707/(919) 419 1754
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am he who walks the States with a barb'd tongue, questioning every
one I meet,/Who are you that wanted only to be told what you knew
before?/ Who are you that wanted only a book to join you in your
nonsense?"  _Leaves of Grass_ xxiii.4.
From: gimble@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (David Caruso II)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Dating an older woman
Date: 26 Sep 92 00:22:19 CDT
Organization: America, Planet Earth

Isaac Corban writes:
> Heres the story.  I'm a guy in his mid 20's and I've recently started dating
> a woman in her upper 30's (maybe 40? I haven't asked).  The difference in
> age doesn't bother me but there is one thing that has me a little concerned.
> She is divorced with two children, an 18 year old daughter and a 12 year old
> son.  If you stop and think about the fact that the I'm closer in age to the
> daughter than to the woman I'm dating, well I'm worried about how her kids
> are going to react.  Intellectually I believe that it should not matter.
> Years of conservative social indoctrination has got me confused about the
> entire situation though.  Anyone out there been in a similar situation?
> anyone got any advice for me?

	When it comes down to it, the only thing that matters is you and
her.  No one else.  The greatest outside influence on your relationship is
obviously the viewpoint of the people whos' opinions are important to you
and her.  If you can honestly look yourself in the eye and answer this
question with a "yes," then best of luck to you:  Can and will I be
comfortable seeing this woman in the presence of the people who mean the
most to me? 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 David Caruso II                               Email: gimble@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle)
Subject: Re: men in their thirties who never dated
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 07:30:27 GMT

>ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:

>>I "disappeared rather abruptly" because I was *kicked out* of soc.singles

Try again, Ed.  "Kicked out" of a usenet newsgroup?  Give me a break.
You've been around long enough to know it can't be done.  Otherwise a
certain  Mr Hasan B Mutlu wouldn't provide us the endless hours of
amusement that he does, as we try to construct elaborate killfile
expressions to get as many of his posts as we can.  (I think the
record was 42 in one morning? Killfiles are our friends.)

>>by a group of net.censors who said anyone who didn't agree that
>>physical appearance was a necessary part of a romantic relationship
>>was not welcome here.  

martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:
>Would that it were true.  If it worked once, it might work again.

I hope so.  I killed over 100 articles with one little 'k', all
generated by reactions to Mr Ed Wright.  But I dunno, I think ignoring
him might be better than trying to drive him off.  
-- 

Kiran Wagle                           <kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci)
Subject: Re: men in their thirties who never dated
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 14:01:02 GMT

In article <BvDrur.K0A@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>
>>ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>
>>>words into my mouth.  I said that I was kicked out of soc.singles.
>>>In other words, I was responding to people like you who posted about 
>>>a million messages saying, "this subject is not appropriate of this 
>>>newsgroup.  Get the hell out of here."  Perhaps I was wrong to knuckle
>>>under so easily to you petty censors, but it won't happen again. 
>*laugh*  Then perhaps we should try a different approach.  Let's just
>ignore him, folks.  Let him post whatever he wants, but don't respond
>except to correct errors of fact, of which there seem to be many.  Let
>him opine as he sees fit.  Just say 'n'.

Actually, Ed Wright has as much right to post here as anyone else and to
start and contribute to discussions.  If people agree with or do not
agree wite what he posts, followups are possible by hitting "F".

He might not have the same philosophies as some other people, but from
what I see he usually backs his arguments up with a certain amount of
personal theory.  I see nothing wrong with that.

-Nance
-- 
Nance Colucci  *^*^*^*^*^*    o__    *^*^*^*^*  |  Work that body!
att!ihlpk!colucci            _.>/               | Stay fit for life.
                            (_) \(_)                           
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Marriage
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: soc.singles
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 92 17:10:20 GMT

In article <BvB9Au.uo@inews.Intel.COM> gbennett@frx781.intel.com (gbennett) writes:
>
>I would like to pose a hypothetical question to any single willing to
>respond.  Here it is:
>
>   Would you be willing to give up a career, a new home, and a new car
>   for an everlasting and loving marriage?

Sure, for the right person.  (Though, I may not be the best person to 
answer this question, since I don't have a career, nor do I ever expect
to have one.)

Trygve
From: fredw@mks.com (Fred Walter)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Acceptance!
Date: 30 Sep 92 19:58:13 GMT
Organization: Mortice Kern Systems Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>loosemore-sandra@CS.YALE.EDU (Sandra Loosemore) writes:
>>I seem to be managing to hang out on campus forever myself (without
>>even trying very hard!), and it's not all it's cracked up to be.
>
>It's all it's cracked up to be.  You never get old, you stay eternally young,
>[lots of stuff deleted]
>after marriage you have sex 4 times a week

Just 4 ?!?!? Oh man, yet another reason to not get married.

:-)

>Even before the marriage, with all the mental and physical stimulation of the
>environment, loneliness is an impossibility.

	fred "Tongue in cheek, eh ? But *whose* cheek ?" walter
-- 
Disclaimer: everything I write is my *personal* opinion and does not represent
or reflect the opinion of the company which employs me.
From: epg@nature.Berkeley.EDU (little 'e' string)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: The Engagement Ring Question (I want one Damnit!)
Date: 26 Sep 1992 17:36:15 GMT
Organization: Bourbon Street
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: nature.berkeley.edu

In article <1992Sep23.210435.1001@cs.hw.ac.uk> neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite) writes:
>In article <19nso0INNm8p@agate.berkeley.edu> epg@nature.Berkeley.EDU (little 'e' string) writes:
>>
>>My point: If someone gave me an engagement ring it would not be "just a
>>shiny trinket to show off to the world."  It would be a symbol of how
>>happy that person is to be with me and a symbol of appreciation of my
>>specialness and who I am.  Other people might see it, but I would see it
>>more than anyone else, and it would be a constant reminder to me that
>
>Why not something practical from the bloke like a Video Recorder and a
>CD-Midi system if all you are after is a token, not shiney trinkets.

Well give me a VCR that will still be in mint working condition when I'm
70, that I'll be able to bequeth to my grandchild, and I'll take it.

Besides, I'd look pretty stupid dangling a VCR on my finger, wouldn't I? 
Sheesh!

Just me,

little (not after a trinket, just an emerald) 'e'
From: fredw@mks.com (Fred Walter)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: men in their thirties who never dated
Date: 28 Sep 92 04:01:36 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Mortice Kern Systems Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes:
>fredw@mks.com (Fred Walter) writes:
>>>I "disappeared rather abruptly" because I was *kicked out* of soc.singles
>
>>You had your account yanked ?
>
>I never said I had me account yanked.  Once again you're putting
>words into my mouth.  I said that I was kicked out of soc.singles.

I'm not putting words in your mouth. (I'm not putting anything of mine
in your mouth. You might bite it). I'm writing an interpretation on the
words that *you* put in *your* mouth. This is one result of your being
vague - people make assumptions. Life sure is rough, eh ?

>In other words, I was responding to people like you who posted about 
>a million messages saying, "this subject is not appropriate of this 
>newsgroup.  Get the hell out of here."

You are a hypocrite. You are doing the very thing you have
mistakenly disparaged me of doing.

	fred
-- 
Disclaimer: everything I write is my *personal* opinion and does not represent
or reflect the opinion of the company which employs me.
Newsgroups: soc.singles