HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sasbge@ant.unx.sas.com (Gantt Edmiston)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Fan for CPU chips
Date: 8 Oct 92 17:48:18 GMT
Reply-To: sasbge@ant.unx.sas.com
Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
Originator: sasbge@ant.unx.sas.com


In article, sasbge@ant.unx.sas.com (Gantt Edmiston) writes:
>
>In article, morganti@sc2a.unige.ch writes:
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>	2 or 3 week ago I have seen in this group (or in comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc)
>>an news on a small fan for cooling CPU chips like 486DX2 50 or 66 MHz but I 
>>have lost the informations (address, price etc). Can somebody help me ?
>>
>>Thank's
>>PYM
>>
>
>Do you get Computer Shopper in Switzerland?  There is an advertisement
>in this months issue for this device.  Unless someone beats me to the
>punch, I'll get the info and post it tonight from home.
>
>BTW, the device is $49.00 (US) and plugs into the power supply inside
>the PC.  It comes with mounting clips and blows air directly on the
>chip.  The problem (as I see it) is that if the air around the chip is
>hot, this device won't make it any cooler.  You also have to ensure that
>proper ventilation is engineered into the cabinet itself.

Well, this is *not* the info from Computer Shopper, but I caught this
later in this group:


Thermalloy Heatsink Fan Unit for 486 CPUs, 

	-Ideal for 486SX, 486DX, or 486DX2 CPUs	ANY SPEED
	-Reduces Temperature of CPUs to cool finger touch
        -Includes Heatsink/Fan Unit, Mounting Hardware, Easy 
         Installation Instructions
        -Connects to +5V Supply (Optional PC Power Supply Connector
         Available. Connector is Y'd so you don't lose a PS plug)

These units are designed specifically for 486 CPUs.  They are not some 
cheap fan that installs in the PC.  This same unit without the mounting
hardware is listed at $49.95 in Oct. Computer Shopper (see ad for 
picture).
 
I have contacted several people who have purchased these units.  They
have been delighted with the results.  When you have big $$ invested
in a CPU, why risk premature failure from heat? (I know, the RISK is
debateable)  I have personally seen 486DX 50MHz CPUs experience
lockups.  After installing the fan heatsink, no more problems.  Also,
I'm TOLD INTEL does not warrantee 486DX 50 CPUs.

I am not sending COD anymore because it adds cost.  I am relying on
the honesty of my fellow man.

$31.00 INCLUDES SHIPPING
$33.00 with PC power supply connector installed

Jeff Knopp
jefff@ihlpl.att.com
708-979-1725


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gantt Edmiston - SysAdmin     o |If you always do what you have always done, 
SAS Institute Inc.          <(  |you'll always get what you've always gotten!
Quality Assurance - V416     [\.+--------------------------------------------
Cary NC 27513 919-677-8000 x6091|          sasbge@ant.unx.sas.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          The opposite of RIGHT is not only LEFT, it's also WRONG
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: russest@ampex.com (Steve Russell)
Subject: Re: Large Capacity Hard Disks
Organization: Ampex Corporation, Redwood City CA
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 16:40:33 GMT

In article <10666281.55.718963485@eng2.eng.monash.edu.au> 10666281@eng2.eng.monash.edu.au (KEVIN PRATER) writes:
>
>		I currently have an 80mb hard disk and have found this about 
>	5 times too small. So when I buy my next pc I plan to get a larger 
>	one so that I have greater than 400mb. 	
>	What I want to know is,
>1/  is it better to get two fair sized disks,(say
>    200 mb each) or to get one large 400-500mb disk.
>    Does having the two disks make more sxnce as if an
>    error occurs, you still have one disk? What I mean is 
>    that if track 0 goes bad on the large disk, the disk is
>    stuffed. Whereas on a smaller one you've only done half
>    your money?
>
>2/  Does it work out cheaper to buy a large disk rather than
>    two small ones or just partion a large disk?
>

I've got two lxt-200's on line and I wish I had one bigger one.

Tower case is no problem but desk top loses a slot better used for CD-rom.

Concerns about data loss are valid if you have one or two drives. Most of
my problems have been partition table related, not hardware related.

Either way, don't forget the tape backup.....

-steve
From: carl@Cayman.COM (Carl Heinzl)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: QUESTION: Are IDE cacheing controllers better than Smartdrive?
Date: 8 Oct 92 14:14:21 GMT
	<1992Oct7.180842.1@vax1.umkc.edu>
Organization: Cayman Systems Inc., Cambridge, MA
In-reply-to: eputnam@vax1.umkc.edu's message of 8 Oct 92 00:08:42 GMT
bcc: carl


>bus rates.  For us ISA users that is a BIG difference.  True, when the actual
>movement of data occurs you will lose with the software cache, and you do have
>to dedicate more CPU cycles to software caches, but for the cost of SIMMs, you

So, when the local bus *xyz* (pick you favourite disk type and insert
here) cacheing controllers are available this won't be the issue!!!

So, with *3* local bus slots available I see video, disk ctlr and
network.  Now, *what* manufacturers actually make a motherboard with
*3* local bus slots???  The great majority of manufacturers only have
*1* local bus slot...

You had very good points otherwise!

-Carl-
--
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: hrbaan@cs.ruu.nl (Hayo Baan)
Subject: Upgrading RAM on an eteq 486/25
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 14:23:50 GMT
Organization: Utrecht University, Dept. of Computer Science
Keywords: ram, 486, eteq, simm


Hi there,

I am thinking of upgrading my 4MB eteq 486/25 ISA to 16MB.
My question is :
1) Should I buy 1MB or 4MB simms,
2) What jumpers do I have to (re)set (I didn't receive the manual of the
   board). 

My configuration is as follows :
-) ETEQ 486/25 ISA board
-) 4 1MB simms

Thanks in advance,

Hayo (Hi Ho) Baan

-- 

A program WAS just like a nose; now that I 
make 'm they don't blow anymore!
From: vo@work.seas.upenn.edu (Al Bundy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Comment about Oxy.
Date: 12 Oct 92 17:48:37 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


When I threatened to cancel my order last Wednesday, some Customer Services
reps named "Amy" asked me to call her back.  I called her back 4 times,
and  at last I had a chance to talk to her. She said something like one
of my credit cards is not good?!!!!!!.  Supposed that is true because I use
my brother credit card, I give her numbers of my new credit card, and aksed
her to call me back to confirm the shipping date and the validation of my
card.  She promised to call me back in 10 min and she never did.  I am really
mad.  If I do not receive my system tomorrow, I cancel my order and do 
something to that f***** company.
It is funny that on the 3rd time I called them about shipping date, they said
mine needed to pass a 72 hour-burn test.  3 weekes later, when I called them,
they said mine needed to pass a 72 hour-burn test.  What the heck is wrong
with this people?  They have no concept of time.

Their systems looks good, and the price is affordable.  But if you have no
time to wait for a computer, and don't want to be harassed, then NEVER EVER
NEVER NEVER order any thing from this &*^%$_#@ company.
From: adhir@cygnus.umd.edu (Alok Dhir)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Connecting 3 drives
Date: 7 Oct 92 05:59:10 GMT
Organization: /etc/organization

I am trying to connect 3 floppy drives to my FD controller which claims
to support up to four.  I have 2 1.44meg 3.5s and 1 1.2meg 5.25.  My
instructions say to set one drive to ID #1, one to ID #2, and one to ID #3
(as opposed to setting both to #2 and using a twisted cable. which is the
standard way of doing things).  Well, that's all well and good, except
that I have NO CLUE how to set my Teac 3.5" 1.44mb drives to ID #1 (right
now both are 2, the 5.25 is 3...).  You'd think it would be easy to
figure out, but it isn't.  Here's what the jumpers look like along with the
writing next to the pins on the circuit board:

		A  B  C  D  E
	     1	.  .  .__.  . 
	     2  .__.  .  .  . 

The lines( __ ) connecting the pins(.) above are the positions of two jumpers 
which are currently on the drive, apparently setting it to ID#2.

Does anyone know how the heck this works?  Anyone care to venture a guess?

I called tech support, but they don't know either (I didn't think they 
would...  Bunch of clowns for tech support over at Zenon).

Thanks.
-- 
 ============================================================================
 Al Dhir                      			   Technical Consulting Staff
 Internet: adhir@cygnus.umd.edu	  	 University of Maryland, College Park
 Bitnet:   adhir%cygnus.umd.edu@Interbit      (301) 405-1500 * (301) 405-3014
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: tgao@m.cs.uiuc.edu (Tong Gao)
Subject: Help needed with GW2000 Telepath modem
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 05:21:20 GMT

Please help me! After frustrated by the defective design 4 months ago, I got
another telepath modem today. Sadly, I am still having problem with it.
It works perfectly when I rlogin to main frame or download. However, I am
having all kinds of trouble when uploading. I tried to connect to a 14.4 modem
and upload through there with Qmodem, and it gives me tons of transmission
errors for a small file. Then I tried to connect to a 9600 modem and upload
through there(also with Qmodem). This time it just disconnect me without
transmitting anything(consistently). So for these of you who are having fun
with your modems, could you please tell me what I did wrong? As I said, I only
used Qmodem, and the dips are set to COM1 and IRQ4. Thanks a million.

Tong
tgao@cs.uiuc.edu
From: adhir@cygnus.umd.edu (Alok Dhir)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: RAM memory is actualy a DRAM, isn't it ?
Date: 10 Oct 92 23:25:00 GMT
Organization: /etc/organization

In article <14021.2ac6fad2@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu> viznyuk@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:
>
>  I have a question to PC community:
>
>  As far as I understood, the RAM memory on the
>486 computers is actually DRAM, contrary to
>SRAM cache memory. What I don't understand then
>is why to upgrade the RAM from 8Mb to 16Mb cost
>at least 150 bucks. DRAM is supposed to be much
>cheaper.
>S.V.

Actually, the upgrade from 8mb to 16mb costs more like $400 or so.  Maybe a 
little more.  The reason is that most motherboards have 8 simm slots...
either 1mb or 4mb simms.  Most 8mb machines have 8 1mb simms in them
totalling the 8 mb of RAM.  When you want to jump to 16, you have to toss
your 1mb simms and buy 4 4mb simms which are at least $100 ea. these days.
What alot of people do is jump to 20mb from 8... They buy 4 4mb simms and
instead of tossing all 8 1mb simms, they fill 1 bank with 4 mb simms and
one bank with 1 mb simms - totalling 20 mb.

Your figure of $150 could be possible if the motherboard had 16 simm slots.
(You might be thinking "or if originally the board was populated with 2 4mb
simms to make 8mb ram" but this is usually not possible.  You must fill
up at least one bank of 4 slots).
-- 
 ============================================================================
 Al Dhir                      			   Technical Consulting Staff
 Internet: adhir@cygnus.umd.edu	  	 University of Maryland, College Park
 Bitnet:   adhir%cygnus.umd.edu@Interbit      (301) 405-1500 * (301) 405-3014
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:26941 comp.unix.bsd:7442 comp.org.eff.talk:6445
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.unix.bsd,comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Question on Diamond Clock Synthesizer
Date: 14 Oct 92 21:30:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: netcom.1992Oct14.213005.12729
Distribution: inet
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <RICH.92Oct13223632@kappa.Rice.edu> Rich@rice.edu writes:
>In article <1bf4b5INNh4n@agate.berkeley.edu> curtis@cs.berkeley.edu (Curtis Yarvin) writes:
>   In article <1992Oct12.061220.17620@netcom.com> hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) writes:
>   >
>   >Why bother with Diamond,
>   >When you can buy an Orchid's F1280 or Artix's GraphicsEngine.
>
>   Because if Diamond's clocks were truly programmable, you could
>   use a Diamond card to drive a fixed-sync monitor, like a used Sun
>   gray-scale.  This would be a hefty boon, as there don't seem to 
>   be large mono monitors available for PCs.
>
>   c

I doubt that Diamond is the only svga manufacturer with a programmable
clock synthetizer. For instance, Chrontel CH9203, is a programmable
clock synthetizer. What Diamond has is a propieratory way of 
programming their clock synthetizer.

Amancio

>
>Radius makes a 21" inch 1200x1024 mono monitor and Sigma Designs make
>19" 1664x1200 mono and grey scale monitors.  Drivers haven't been
>written yet, but these two are prime candidates.
>
>If anyone has info on other high resolution monochrome hardware,
>please send me a note!  Rich
From: tkhut@ap.cl.msu.edu (Scott Karre)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: QUESTION: Which VGA graphics accerator board is the best for $250?
Date: 7 Oct 92 04:39:15 GMT
Organization: Michigan State University, USA


     Im thinking about getting a better VGA card for my 386DX 33 and have seen 
tons of different kinds advertised in the computer shopper.  Aries had a 
promising looking one, in their new and improved Diamond Speedstar 24x, but
they only sell them with their systems.  What graphics card would you 
reccomend I get, that will speed up all my graphics applications like 
windows, but be somewhere around $250 in cost?  Thanks for any info!

	Kris

	     " That which does not kill us, makes us stronger... "

*******************************************************************************
*  Kris Kortright  ( tkhut@ap.cl.msu.edu or kortrigh@cem.cemvax.msu.edu )     *
*  Research : Laser analytical chemistry under Dr. Gary Blanchard             *
*  Depatment of Chemistry  -  Michigan State University  -  E. Lans. Michigan *
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: imbri_m@aesc.cs.odu.edu (Mark Imbriaco)
Subject: Re: has anyone used the 486dx2 66mhz gateway
Keywords: gatew
Organization: Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:56:59 GMT


>>Has anyone used the 486dx2 66mhz gateway system yet.. could you give me any advice on it.. does it crash .. ok.. not yet out etc.. also any feedback on the localbus video situation.. vesa standard ..etc.. any good... faster?? etc.. help me
>>

>I've had mine for a  week.  It has not (knock on wood) crashed yet and
>hte only problems i've had were OS/2 related to the ATI video drivers and
>I think 95% of that was my own fault.
>
>It is fast, the only benchmark I have right now is a 3dbench score of 45.4
>which is a measure of graphics performance and is about 2.2x my previous
>486-33 with an ATI ultra.

Comparative to a 486/50DX what is the performance of the 66 Dx/2?  Faster?  
Slower?  Seems that I have heard that it is not quite as fast as a 50DX but
I am not sure on the reliability of that source.  Please elaborate.




Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.intel,comp.benchmarks
From: gisie@wam.umd.edu (Satan)
Subject: SyQuest MESA Series Drives
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 13:50:57 GMT

Has anyone seen the new Syquest Mesa 105Mb removable drives?
I saw one at a show in DC during the summer.  Syquest said
they would be shipping Sep/Oct, then Oct/Nov now they say
Nov/Dec.  I know, I know...it'll be here next year sometime.

Anyone have any other information?

For those who are curious...

	Mesa Drive Specs:
		105 Mb formatted capacity
		14ms access time
		IDE controller interface
		3.5" cartridge size


-- 
gisie@wam.umd.edu
"Beat me, whip me, make me feel small..." :)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.unix.bsd,comp.org.eff.talk,misc.legal
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
Subject: Re: Question on Diamond Clock Synthesizer
Organization: Weber State University  (Ogden, UT)
Distribution: inet
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 19:47:25 GMT

In article <1bf4heINNh62@agate.berkeley.edu> curtis@cs.berkeley.edu (Curtis Yarvin) writes:
>In article <1992Oct12.044838.15514@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@icarus.weber.edu writes:
>>
>>	Sorry, reverse engineering may not be illegal, bit it can still be
>>litigated (and won) by the "damaged" party
>
>Oh.  Right.  Now I remember.  This is Amerika - where the two are not
>synonymous.
>
>>please see:
>>
>>	Digital Equipment Corporation vs. EMC^2
>
>Right.  Thanks for clearing me up.

The problem appears to be a misconception that there is a "guilty" party in
civil law in the US, just as there is in criminal law.  This isn't the case.

Criminal law requires proof "beyond a reasonable doubt"; civil law requires
on "a preponderance of evidence".  Civil law is much closer to the classical
concept of "the scales of justice" than criminal law.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@icarus.weber.edu
					terry_lambert@novell.com
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        "I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
 Get the 386bsd FAQ from agate.berkeley.edu:/pub/386BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: carl@asl-ipx1.med.ge.com (Carl Crawford)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: monochrome use of nec multisync monitor
Date: 8 Oct 92 16:08:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: mr.1992Oct8.160852.3715
Reply-To: carl@asl-ipx1.med.ge.com (Carl Crawford)
Organization: GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee,  WI


i have the following configuration: tandon '286; mca monochrome driver
card; and a nec multisync monitor. the cursor is displayed at very low
intensity and the contrast between characters and the background in
reverse video is very low.  when the nec is first turned on, the cursor
and the reverse video are displayed correctly. after a few 100's of
msecs, something in the nec clicks (perhaps a relay?) and the display
returns to its poor state. i connected an old monitor from a leading
edge xt to the tandon, and the video is fine. is the mca not compatible
w/ the nec? is the nec defective? or is there some s/w signal that i
need to send to the mca (nec) to configure the nec (there is a ttl
interface)?
--
Carl R. Crawford	   Voice: 414-521-6572
GE Medical Systems	   Fax: 414-521-6575
P.O. Box 414, W-875	   Internet: crawfordc@med.ge.com
Milwaukee, WI 53201
From: aron@samarra.ced.berkeley.edu (aron bonar)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Diamond SpeedStar 24X Hype?
Date: 13 Oct 1992 18:46:28 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: samarra.ced.berkeley.edu

In article <1bf1rfINNc7g@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, dab6@po.CWRU.Edu (Douglas A. Bell) writes:
|> 
|> In a previous article, ngai@nova.bellcore.com (John Ngai) says:
|> 
|> The speedstar 24x does not have drivers for os/2 2.0.  They are promised
|> for some time in the future.  It is a nice fast card, but it doesn't
|> do high color modes with very good refresh rates.

Drivers for OS/2 2.0 are due out this month (October) sometime.  I hope they keep 
their promise.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: shim@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Sam Shim)
Subject: Re: PC memory chip timing maths??
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: comp
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 22:18:32 GMT

In article <VEIKKO.92Oct16004508@lk-hp-1.hut.fi> veikko@snakemail.hut.fi (Vesa J Pyyluoma) writes:
>
>Right, this must be a FAQ and an old one just the same but the question
>just crossed my mind as I was browsing through this SIMM thread...
>How was it exactly that you calculate the RAM speed requirement for a
>XX MHz 386 for 0/1 WS operation?  Or a 486??  How many processor cycles

Use this formula to figure out the RAM speed necessary for guaranteed
zero wait state operation on a non-superscalar XX MHz computer:

     RAM Speed (ns)= 1000 (ns/ms) * 1/XX (ms)
          [ns = nanosecond = 1 billionth of a second]
          [ms = microsecond (not millisecond in this case) = 1 millionth of
           a second]

So, for a 10 MHz computer, you will need 100 ns chips (1000 * 1/10 = 100).
For a 33 MHz computer, you will need 30 ns chips (1000 * 1/33.33 = 30).

For 1 waite state operation just double the zero wait state speed.

-Sam-
From: isckbk@nuscc.nus.sg (Kiong Beng Kee)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: SCSI disk for PCs
Date: 16 Oct 92 01:12:49 GMT
Organization: National University of Singapore

Anyone with information as to whether it is possible buy a SCSI
disk and stick it in a box with power supply; rather than
buy an external unit from a dealer?

If the above is possible, is it worth it?  and how (pin connections)?

thanks.
-- 
Kiong Beng Kee
Dept of Information Systems and Computer Science
National University of Singapore
Lower Kent Ridge Road, SINGAPORE 0511
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,sci.electronics,comp.text.tex,comp.lsi.cad
From: pjh@mccc.edu (Pete Holsberg)
Subject: Re: Announcing circuit symbols for LaTeX
Organization: The College On The Other Side Of Route One
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 15:34:51 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.121035.16585@csqx.cs.rhbnc.ac.uk> adrian@csqx.cs.rhbnc.ac.uk (A Johnstone) writes:
=
= Announcing...
=
=a set of circuit schematic symbols for LaTeX picture mode. The
=set includes all basic logic gates in four orientations, FETs,
=power supply pins, transmission gates, capacitors, resistors and
=wiring T-junctions.

Is the equivalent for other formats -- EPS, HPGL, Lotus PIC, PCX, TIFF
or GIF -- available anywhere?

Pete
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: HELP, MY COMPUTER LOST 512K!!!!
From: white_w@ab.wvnet.edu
Date: 15 Oct 92 13:13:15 -0500
Organization: Alderson-Broaddus College

	HELP!!!!

	I just put an 80286-20 board and a new drive controller into my old xt.
My problem is that when I turn it on it flashes a message about a CMOS test
failing as it runs through its system settings, but I havn't been able to read
what exactly the errors are.  I don't know what it means.  Also the system
board has 1024k installed in simms, but the setup program won't aknowledge the
upper 512k of it.  I don't know if these two problems are related or not, but
please tell me what to try.
	THANKS IN ADVANCE!!!!!

	WILL

p.s. please E-MAIL me if you can.  If not, posing will be fine.
	Thanks Again
  
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: shim@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Sam Shim)
Subject: Re: Does the Diamond Speedstar 24x Have 1024 x 768 x 16M color drivers?
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 20:27:35 GMT

In article <1992Oct10.013604.15307@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> tkhut@ap.cl.msu.edu (Scott Karre) writes:
>
>	I just purchased a Diamond Speedstar 24x SVGA board, and the stats 
>say that it can run 16 million colors only in 640 x 480 mode.  Are there
>new drivers out there that allow you to get 16 million colors or even
>32 K colors in a higher resolution mode?  Or are there new drivers out
>there for the 24x that give improved performance?  Thanks!

There might be a 800x600x32K color mode, but I'm not sure on that.
There are no 1024x768x16M color or 1024x768x32k color modes on the 24x
though, because with any 1 Meg video card, you can have at most 256
colors at 1024x768 (1024x768x1 = 768K of RAM).

Diamond released new Window 3.1 drivers on their bbs last week.  It seems
to be a bit faster than the old drivers.

-Sam-