HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dinneen@sequent.com (Jay Dinneen)
Subject: Re: The debate is on?????
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc.
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 92 18:11:56 GMT

Bush doesn't want that  many people to watch the debates.  If he
succeeds with
the World Series debate schedule then his hope is that with a
smaller audience he might be able to get a real good sound bite
for the news which is what people will watch.  Bush will be almost
if not downright mean and Clinton should respond with either meanness
or humor.  I don't think Bush should get his time schedule, or his 4
debates.  I do think he should get a kick in the teeth though.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: crail@nevada.edu (DONNA CRAIL-RUGOTZKE)
Subject: Re: Royko article: Next Time, Dan, Take Aim At Arnold
Organization: University of Nevada System Computing Services
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 03:43:47 GMT

In article <92271.200057KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>In article <15666@borg.cs.unc.edu>, saxe@excalibur.cs.unc.edu (Eddie Saxe) says:
>
>>Yet again, you duck the question.  The Quaylster said, as has been posted
>>here many times, that Murphy Brown's decision to raise the child herself is
>>not a valid "lifestyle alternative."  Therefore, he must have some opinion
>>as to what a valid decision was, unless he is just another vaucuous
>>neoconservative (definitely *not* what a *true* conservative feels)
>>demagogue.  So, which, do you think, is Dan's "right" model for action?
>
>My point is that Murphy Brown, the fictional character, could have been
>written differently, so it's stupid to feel sorry for Murphy Brown, the
>fictional character.
>
>Anyway, Quayle's point is that the TV show may implicitly -promote-, or
>-glamourize- single motherhood by making Murphy Brown a single mother, and
>acting like it's no big deal, that fathers aren't important.
>

Is it wrong for television shows to show single mothers?  As some one pointed
out on another newsgroup, there have been many shows that have protrayed 
single fathers (*My two Dads*, *Crossroads*,etc.).  Are these shows just as bad
as *Murphy Brown*?  

>Of course, a -real live- woman in her situation who has the courage to have
>the child and either raise it or give it up for adpotion has Quayle's respect;
>he's said as much since the media started going nuts over the Murphy Brown
>sentence in his speech.

But-gosh-just don't show one on teIf a "reaeous, why does Danny object to
showing one on t.v.?  I doubt he objects to old war movies and westerns.
Some old war movies glamorize war more than *Murphy Brown* glamorizes
single motherhood.
>The trick is to distinguish between real people and fictional characters.

After Danny boy tried to give Murphy's child a stuffed toy, I wonder if
he knows the difference between reality and fiction.  Think about it,
he is only heartbeat away from the presidency.


>
>------------
>Kurt Ludwick
>------------

Donna
crail@nevada.edu



Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: debates
Date: 6 Oct 92 02:25:00 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy

cass8806@elan.glassboro.edu (KYLE CASSIDY) writes:

> i can barely wait to see our boy dan take on al gore in the debate.
> 
> any thoughts on who might win?

 If Dan debated a empty chair, he probably lose.  Is this going to be one 
'o' them single moderater debates or one 'o' them three reporter debates?
I have to rememeber to get some popcorn next time i'm at the store.  Do 
they allow teleprompters at these things?  Will Marylin stand just off 
stage and whisper helpful things?

--
popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, (713) 943-2728 in Houston, Texas
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton
From: forda@gtephx.UUCP (Andrew Ford @ AGCS, Phoenix, Arizona)
Subject: Re: Neil "Welfare Queen" Bush
Organization: gte
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 18:43:33 GMT

In article <23390@hacgate.SCG.HAC.COM>, msheldon@luna.dpl.scg.hac.com (Marti Sheldon) writes:
> 
> ##############################################################################
> 
> >You can not be one kind of man and another kind of President.
> 
> >Bush/Quayle 92
> 
> >Fred Seals
> 
> ##############################################################################
> 
> FRED - You cannot be one kind of president for the first four years,
> and another kind for the next four.
> 
> This country can't take another four years!!!
> 
> CLINTON/GORE '92!
> 

Headlong from the frying pan into the fire -- yeah, that's what we need!

Andre Marrou / Nancy Lord for 92.
-- 
"25 States allow anyone to buy a gun, strap it on, and walk down the street with
no permit of any kind: some say it's crazy.  However, 4 out of 5 US murders are 
committed in the other half of the country: so who is crazy?"   -  Andrew Ford
gtephx!forda@enuucp.eas.asu.edu  OR  !uunet!samsung!romed!enuucp!gtephx!forda
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: Re: Pseudonyms
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 20:21:47 GMT

Lisa Henn writes:

>>In article <1992Oct2.181834.12347@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>, rbalko@attmail.com () writes...

>>How about a list ok aliases for our idle	
  .
  .
  .
>>	Rain-Man

>I object to this one--it's an insult to autistics!

True, but it does sound like something the Secret Service might have used
as Dan's code name.   }8-|

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: pat@sphinx.phys.Virginia.EDU (pat walsh)
Subject: Re: A New Quote!
Organization: University of Virginia Physics Department
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 15:57:01 GMT

Howard Black writes:

>    JDQ recently completed a 200mile bus trip through our lucky state, and,
>on one stop, was asked what effect Ross Perot re-entering the race would
>have on the GHWB/JDQ campaign.  He said "If Perot re-enters the race, it's
>good for us, and if he stays out, that's good for us".  Asked what he meant
>by that, he said "That's for you to figure out".

>    Later, he "clarified" this remark to mean that if Perot re-enters the
>race, the focus will be more on the economy, which is one of GHWB's strong
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>points.
 ^^^^^^

>[source: Champaign News-Gazette, Tuesday, 9/29/92]


To borrow a line from Robin Williams, this is like saying that catering was
one of Gandhi's strong points!  :-)

- Patrick Walsh
  University of Virginia Department of Physics
  pw@virginia.bitnet, pw@virginia.edu, pat@gomez.phys.virginia.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Handicapping Gore (was Private vs Public)
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 19:53:08 GMT

im sure that dan-o has a much better handicap than gore.

why do think he prefers golf to sex?

(hey golf-players--is a LOW handicap better, or a high one? honestly,
i dont know....)

r
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Indiscretions
Date: 1 Oct 1992 00:31:12 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu
Keywords: Marilyn, screw, GHWB

sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman) writes:

>Regarding Marilyn's indiscretions:  This is the answer to the
>question, "why did George Humbert Walker Bush choose Our Boy
>for VP, again?"  Y'see, GHWB wasn't really chosing Our Boy ...

Do you actually believe that GHWB would rather sleep with Marilyn...
than with Dan? 

						--  M.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann)
Subject: Private vs Public
Organization: Society for Putting Things on Top of Other Things
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 22:00:27 GMT

So Dan-oe feels he is at a disadvantage in a debate with Gore because
he [Dan-oe] went to public school, while Gore went to private schools.

Is Dan-oe asking for a handicap?  We could spot him four questions and
he'll still lose.  But remember, any advantage he gets also goes to
Clinton, right?  After all, Bush went to Andover before he went to
Yale.

Another solution would be that Dan-oe will be allowed to write hints
on his wrists and shoe soles, and gets a break every 15 minutes to
read his notes in the men's room.

-- 
Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer.  Take your pick.

Centigram Communications Corp, San Jose California  408/428-3553
From: sham@cs.arizona.edu (Shamim Zvonko Mohamed)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bertie Wooster/DQ: One and the same?
Date: 29 Sep 92 15:26:09 GMT
Organization: U of Arizona, CS Dept, Tucson

|> > >>Has anyone else been struck by the similarities between Bertie Wooster
|> > >>and Dano?  Both amiable incompetents from outrageously rich families,
|> > >>bumbling their way through life.  Somehow they both always come out of
|> > >>their self-imposed difficulties intact, although at the price of a fair
|> > >>amount of ridicule.

Yes, certainly, these similarities hold. But Bertie does have a "heart of gold",
whereas Dan-oe is a scoundrel and a blackguard. I think Oofy Prosser is a better
Dan. Oofy would certainly stab his friends for a buck, and we know he has no
principles. (Or, seeing as how this is the Qualye group, perhaps I should say
"principals.")

Strange that we're talking Wodehouse and politics, and no one has brought up
Spode? I nominate Gramm, or perhaps Robertson. A nice mixture of religion and
fascism.

-s
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Subject: Re: What's the deal?
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 15:37:11 GMT

In article <1992Oct4.222251.3951@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>Gee, the name of this group is alt.fan.dan-quayle, but all I see are Quayle
>bashes here.  Could somebody direct me to a group where Republican policies
>and characters are discussed in a more friendly manner?
>-- 
>
>Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu

rec.sport.golf
alt.politics.sleaze
alt.we.are.really.awful.but.the.other.guys.are.worse
alt.publick.schoole
alt.brain.dead

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Indiscretions
Keywords: Marilyn, screw
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 14:49:05 GMT


yes, marilyn quayle has been dorking pat robertson for two years now.

i saw them together at the guns 'n roses concert in d.c.
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: debates
Date: 5 Oct 92 00:55:25 GMT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS (Public Access Usenet for New Orleans)

cass8806@elan.glassboro.edu (KYLE CASSIDY) writes:

> i can barely wait to see our boy dan take on al gore in the debate.
>
> any thoughts on who might win?

That's already been decided.  I'll be interested to see if Our Boy actually
breaks from his well-rehearsed, scripted lines and comes up with an original
thought.




|Edward J. Branley         elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us|
|Seashell Software, Metairie, LA            +1-504-455-5087|
From: HDKP@MUSICB.MCGILL.CA (HDKP)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Dan Quail
Date: 29 Sep 92 21:52:00 GMT
Organization: McGill University

I am a Canadian student observing the Americain Presidential
Election race. And from what I read about Dan Quayle, you guys
have got to be serious?
I mean we got some pretty crummy politicians, ie Constitutional
Referendum and NAFTA and all, but your present VP takes the cake!
Potato! See, even idiots like me can spell that that word.
This is the same guy who blamed "Murphy Brown" for the problems
of single parents!?!

Between Bush/Quayle and Clinton/Gore, what a real bunch of
winners!

Don't worry, our poiliticians are just as stupid as yours!
Please feel free to insult ours just as well!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: harbison@dbsun.uucp (harbison)
Subject: Re: Actual Bush/Quayl sticker sighting in Bay Area!
Organization: BioMerieux-Vitek, St. Louis Mo.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 22:44:22 GMT

I have noticed only a few B/Q stickers here in the St. Louis area.  I
commute about 20 miles (1-way) each day on I-70 and I-270 through St.
Charles county (suburbs, leaning Republican) to the outskirts of St.
Louis County.  I would expect to see more B/Q stickers considering the
demographics of the area I traverse.  Then again, one thing alot of
Missourans (?) have in common these days is unemployment.  That might
explain the sparse distribution of B/Q stickers.

The B/Q sticker I've seen is designed such that the word "Bush" is
clearly visible from a distance.  However, the word "Quayle" is not
visible beyond a distance of 10-20 feet.  Could this be an attempt
to downplay the bottom half of the GOP ticket, or just an artistic
preference?  If DQ was my running mate, I'd probably have his name
in a 6 point font (or maybe X11's 'fixed' font). :-)

-- 
*realName: Phil Harbison
*mailName: harbison%dbsun.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu
*phoneList: 314-731-7475 (w) 314-272-9318 (h)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Subject: Re: Quayle is more charitable than Gore
Reply-To: danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 13:58:36 GMT

   Do you detect a gentle undercurrent of panic in some of the conservative
postings lately?  The one that started this thread was a doozy.

In article <PAUL.92Sep29225900@music.sie.arizona.edu>,
paul@music.sie.arizona.edu (Paul J. Sanchez) writes:
> This might mean that the Quayles are very generous people.  Then
> again, it might mean that they hire a better tax accountant.  Either
> way, I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
> --paul

   Especially when both amounts are thermal noise in the circuts when compared
to the need.  Other objections to the conservative smear campaign:

   (I) Does Danee Quayle have more access to Government resources than Gore or
       less?  Gore might be buying his _own_ airplane tickets some of the time,
       unlike Dannoe.

   (II) How much support do Gore and Dannye get from their famillies in terms
        of vacation trips, logistical serveces etc?

   (III) How much spare time for Quaylee and Gore have?  A busy man will donate
         less to charity simply because he fails to read his junk mail.

   (IV) How much time to Mrs. Dannyeoe and Ms. Clinton have to work for (and 
        hence get involved in) charitable causes?

I could go on and on in this track... 

...I suppose the best way to put it is that my mother has an income of $23,000
per year, my wife and I make about $55,000 between us, and my mother has a hell
of a lot more disposable income than I do.  She owns her house.  Her kids are
self supporting, mine are in preschool, etc.

   The conservative nitwit that started this thread should have done more
research.  The Quaylese might be more generous that the Gores.  From his
information no one could tell.

Dan
Danwell@IASTATE.EDU
From: popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: What's the deal?
Date: 6 Oct 92 02:32:29 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy

saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:

> Gee, the name of this group is alt.fan.dan-quayle, but all I see are Quayle
> bashes here.  Could somebody direct me to a group where Republican policies
> and characters are discussed in a more friendly manner?
> -- 
> 
> Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu


See Alt.Special-prosecutors

Pope Charles  Subgenius Pope Of Houston      30 days til defeat day!


--
popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, (713) 943-2728 in Houston, Texas
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
From: popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Bertie Wooster/DQ: One and the same?
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 92 23:51:52 GMT
Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy

sg@monsoon.com (Sunil Gupta) writes:

> sham@cs.arizona.edu (Shamim Zvonko Mohamed) writes:
> 
> > Strange that we're talking Wodehouse and politics, and no one has brought u
> > Spode? I nominate Gramm, or perhaps Robertson. A nice mixture of religion a
> > fascism.
> 
> Come now; Buchanan is the obvious person to play Spode. If anyone would
> like to go about stomping on people with his hobnail boots, it's Patty!
> 
> Sunil Gupta
> Monsoon Software, Inc.
> sg@monsoon.com


does anybody out there have a file containing the speeches of Buchanan 
and Robertson from the Republican convention?  I did not here them or see 
it printed anywhere, but I see a lot of bits and pieces quoted here and 
there in columns and stories.  I would dearly appreciate it if anybody 
could help me out on this.

Pope Charles  Subgenius Pope of Houston     "Bob" loves you!


--
popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, (713) 943-2728 in Houston, Texas
1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: liuxia@wam.umd.edu (New VaxHacker)
Subject: quote of the vice prisident
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 20:54:40 GMT

I heard someone on the net has a summery of all the interesting sentences
said by the Vice Prisident. Could you please send me a copy of this? 

Thanks in advance...

Liu Xia
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann)
Subject: Re: Bumperstickers (Was: Mr. Casual Sex)
Organization: Society for Putting Things on Top of Other Things
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 23:49:14 GMT

In article <D2150056.f0ul4c@erics.infoserv.com> erics@infoserv.com writes:
>
>I've seen two Bush bumperstickers in the Bay Area. One was in support
>of Bush/Quayle, the other said simply: BUllSHit.

I saw another Bush bumpersticker up at Tomales Bay a couple of weekends
ago, but I didn't think it counted in favor of the Shrub and Our Boy.

It said:   PRESIDENT BUSH.  NOT.


-- 
Maddi Hausmann                madhaus@netcom.com
Humorist, Satirist, Tech Writer.  Take your pick.

Centigram Communications Corp, San Jose California  408/428-3553
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: sieferme@milton.u.washington.edu (Eric Sieferman)
Subject: Re: Marilyn's Indiscretions
Keywords: Marilyn, screw, GHWB
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 19:28:33 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.140453.9141@gvl.unisys.com> train@gvls2.gvl.unisys.com (Herbert Rutledge) writes:
(incisive speculation about MQ's passions deleted)
>| Herbert Rutledge, aka Train     |                                       |
>| Internet: train@.gvl.unisys.com |                                       |

Regarding Marilyn's indiscretions:  This is the answer to the
question, "why did George Humbert Walker Bush choose Our Boy
for VP, again?"  Y'see, GHWB wasn't really chosing Our Boy ...

Hope this clears things up :)

-- 
| Eric Sieferman            |    sieferme@u.washington.edu          |
| U. of W., M.C.I.S.        |    (206) 685-3104                     |

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams)
Subject: Marilyn Quayle GIF posted to alt.binaries.pictures.misc
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 13:30:13 GMT
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: williams@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Kent Williams)
Organization: U of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

For Quayle Watchers everywhere -- this is a must.   Our local liberal
elite student newspaper published a photo of the Marilyn-Meister in
front of a large CHUCK GRASSLEY poster, but cropped off the GR.  I've
taken the liberty of also cropping off the LEY ;-)

I can mail this to people who can't get it from there, but I won't get
involved in teaching you how to unpack it, how to display it etc.

--
Kent Williams -- williams@cs.uiowa.edu Work(335-4496) Home(338-6053)
There used to be an inflammatory quote here.
From: schenn@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov (Lisa Henn)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Pseudonyms
Date: 2 Oct 92 20:20:00 GMT
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Oct2.181834.12347@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>, rbalko@attmail.com () writes...

>How about a list ok aliases for our idle	

Sure!  My terminal is idle, so I'll think about our idol :)


>	The Empty Suit

Kinda goes without saying.

>	Rain-Man

I object to this one--it's an insult to autistics!

>	Vice-Shrub

Very, very funny.  Currently my favorite.

>	Danoe

Getting a bit old, but we got a lot of milage out of it.

L
schenn@mars.lerc.nasa.gov
=============================================================================
Disclaimer:  My employer does not claim that we can breathe on Mars.
From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The debate is on?????
Date: 3 Oct 1992 17:43:06 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

paul@music.sie.arizona.edu (Paul J. Sanchez) writes:

>vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes
>> 
>> Bush wants to debate Clinton during the World Series because he knows  
>that
>> most people will be watching the games. He is a sleazebag and has no  
>respect
>> for the American people.
>> 
>> -Garrett

>I agree completely with what you're saying, but perhaps the American  
>people don't deserve much respect if they'd pay more attention to a  
>sporting event than to their own futures...

Give them the benefit of the doubt.  Maybe they'll all tape the 
debates and watch them after the World Series....

							--  Michal

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jks2x@holmes.acc.Virginia.EDU (Jason K. Schechner)
Subject: Re: Quayle droppings
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 06:06:21 GMT

In article <uocqRB1w165w@unkaphaed.UUCP> popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell) writes:


>Poor Danny.  Dragged down into the filth and mire of Republican political 
>games and corruption.  If only he had suurounded himself with wholesome
>people his proud name would not be besmirched with his asociation with 
>conmen, scam artists, convicted felons, and brutal 3rd world dictators.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   aka: republicans.
>
>--
>popec@unkaphaed.UUCP (William C. Barwell)
>Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, (713) 943-2728 in Houston, Texas
>1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis

-Jason

-- 
"Down here on the planet Earth 
They steal your back and leave the shirt.
Pay you a penny and call it a dime and then   -Jason and
Give you a watch when you run out of time."   -the Scorchers 
Xref: sparky alt.fan.dan-quayle:4934 alt.politics.bush:7783 alt.politics.elections:15229