HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jfc@salmon.macsch.com (Jack Castro)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: UCLA WILL BEAT THE WSU COUGERS
Date: 15 Oct 92 19:12:00 GMT
Organization: The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation (MSC), Los Angeles, CA, USA


 
I predict the score will be UCLA 23, WSU 17.

Positive Points:

1) UCLA's offense is improving. Freshman QB Rob Walker handled the pressure
   much better against Stanford than against Arizona. I don't know if
   statistics show this, but he did look much more poised on TV.
2) UCLA's defense is capable of slowing down the WSU pass attack. 
3) WSU is undefeated and primed to be upset. (UCLA likes upsetting WA teams)
4) UCLA will be out to kill in order to get their first pac-ten win.

Negative Points:

1) Injuries to UCLA's middle linebackers may allow WSU to run
   effectively, and as a result, open up the play action passing game.

2) If UCLA can't establish the run, their offense will do little damage.


On paper, I cannot say that UCLA's chances look good. However, after following
the team closely for the past ten years, I just got a good feeling about this
game. I was not at all surprised by the defeats to Arizona and Stanford. I
am surprised at the lack of offense, however. Hopefully the Bruins can
start running again and make things easier for their freshman QB.


GO BRUINS!
USC Sucks !
`SC Sucks !
Southern Cal Sucks !
Trojans Suck !
-- 
 
Jack Castro                  E-MAIL: j_castro@macsch.com
Northwest Bruin Fan
(All opinions expressed are my own and not my employers.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tomd@solbourne.com (Tom Diessner)
Subject: Re: CU's Kordell Stewart out for four weeks (Detmer Start)
Keywords: Koy Detmer, Kordell Stewart
Organization: Solbourne Computer, Inc., Longmont, CO
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 15:11:25 GMT

>What does anyone think about Koy starting against Oklahoma. I was impressed
>with what I saw in the 2 games that Koy played in (Minnesota and Iowa). If he
>(Detmer) can have a good game against Oklahoma, watch out. I would think that
>would be the confidence that he needs for the rest of the season, especially
>with Kansas, Nebraska, and a possible bowl game coming up.  
>
>But, if Oklahoma bounces him around, and he has trouble making completions, it
>could be a big problem. So, this is a HUGE game coming up for the Buffaloes.
>And, the weather forecast is for cold weather (game time temp of near 30 
>degrees with possible snow flurries). Of course, this can't possibly help 
>Gundy in any way too!
>
>Just a few thoughts....... Looking forward to a hard hitting game this sat nite
>in Boulder. There definately is no love loss between the Sooners and the Buffs.
>
>John Knowles                                  Go RAMS 
>knowles@tachu.atmos.colostate.edu             Greg Primus for the Heisman!!!


I like the idea that Koy is going to start against Oklahoma. I personally
think he understands CU's new offense better than Kordell, and that only makes
sense since he threw the ball in high school almost exclusively, and Kordell was
an option quarterback. Over 8000 yards and 80 touchdowns thrown in four years
of high school is good training for the type of offense CU is putting in.
I'm looking forward to the game and seeing what Koy can do.
-- 

Thomas Diessner | tomd@solbourne.COM | Solbourne Computer Inc. | Longmont, CO
				"GO BUFFS"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ron@osf.org (Ron Birnbaum)
Subject: Re: ESPN Studio Show Question
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 21:08:22 GMT

---------------

|> tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner) writes:
|> >Is it in Craig James's job description that he must disagree with everything
|> >Lee Corso says, or is that just what any normal human being would do?

Oh, come on! It only seems like that!! They really do agree plenty. Just
pay attention and you'll see. They just concentrate on the ones they disagree
on, and breeze by the one they agree on.

-Ron
From: tannerg@carson.u.washington.edu (Glenn Tanner)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: AP Top 25 (Was Re: Miami Can Not Be Denied!!!)
Date: 12 Oct 92 22:54:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Oct12.225405.3248
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

>When Miami played Arizona, they did not
>look that good- a tie with Oregon St. for example.  Miami simply overlooked
>them because FSU was coming up and Penn St. the week after.

  >Doug

How could they overlook a team from (drumroll, please) THE TOUGHEST CONFERENCE
IN THE HISTORY OF ORGANIZED FOOTBALL? 

GT
From: ckoontz@RDXSUN40.AUD.ALCATEL.COM (Carl H. Koontz)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: SWC Preview for 10/17
Date: 15 Oct 92 17:53:09 GMT
Article-I.D.: rdxsun40.9210151753.AA23513

> TCU at MIAMI
> ------------
>  
> The Froggies will be froghandled in this game.  They seemed to have 
> improved from their terrible start, but they are no match for Miami, 
> especially in the Orange Bowl.  Look for the Frogs to generate some
> offense... but only after Miami has rung up a _lot_ of points.
 
Especially after Dennis Erickson castrates a horned frog in practice on
Friday.

This one should be real ugly.

Carl
From: n9041679@henson.cc.wwu.edu (brian h. harper)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: The Bowl Coalition fails yet again
Date: 14 Oct 92 20:45:13 GMT
Article-I.D.: henson.1992Oct14.204513.27385
Organization: Western Washington University

dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com (David Head) writes:


>The Bowl Coalition can't fail "yet again" because this is the first year it is
>going to be in effect.  And it is not actually failing, it's just not being allowed
>to work because the snooty Rose Bowl prefers to be picky picky choosy about who
>plays in their dusty old bowl game.  Until the Rose Bowl stranglehold is broken,
>I don't feel that Washington or Michigan or any of the other Rose Bowl eligible
>teams can complain if they don't win a national championship.  To the University
>of Washington; if you truly want to be national champs and earn some respect for
>your allegedly stilted west coast brethren, then come out from behind the Rose
>Bowl fence and take on Miami (or Florida State I'm hoping).  Looks like it's
>"tradition" or national respect. You choose.

UW has chosen, and they have chosen both. Need I remind anyone that the
closest match-up (as far as rankings go) last year WAS that "dusty old bowl
game". So long as the Rose Bowl feratures top-ranked teams and has
national-champ contenders, it will thrive, tradition and all. 

And as far as for "coming out from behind the Rose Bowl fence", what the
hell is that supposed to mean? Until Miami joins a division that will offer
it decent opponents weekly, it has nothing to whine about. The bowl
coalition is a load of BS. If you want to determine a definite national
champion, the only way to do so is to go to a playoff system and eliminate
ALL the bowl games. Then teams like Stanford , FSU, and Penn State might end
up National Champs, despite having a single loss. Until then, quit bickering
about the Big-10 and Pac-10's devotion to the Rose Bowl. No Bowl game,
wether it's a NC game or not, will ever be as special as the Rose Bowl.

-Brian Harper
From: KRB104@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Lies, D**n Lies, etc (Re: PSU is Overrated!)
Date: 14 Oct 92 11:28:24 GMT
 <31rt032JabdO00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <1992Oct13.233007.12652@ultra.com>
Organization: Penn State University

In article <1992Oct13.233007.12652@ultra.com>, rajiv@ultra.com (Rajiv Dhingra)
says:
>
>-> The interesting thing about this is that I don't believe Paterno would have
>-> ever won a championship if there had been a playoff. He did not have the
>-> best team in the country in either of years they won it. In either year,
>-> Oklahoma or Nebraska would have overpowered him.    By they way, I just
>
>When Penn State won the MNC in '82 it played and beat Nebraska.
>It would have beaten Oklahoma too, if I'm not mistaken those
>were the down years for Switzer with Marcus Dupree giving him
>a lot of head-aches.
>
>BTW, that year the Penn State schedule included 7 bowl teams
>        Alabama under Bear Bryant (only loss of the year)
>        Nebraska
>        Boston College (with Doug Floutie)
>        Pittsburgh (with Dan Marino)
>        West Virginia
>        Georgia (in the Sugar Bowl)
>        Syracuse
>
>The '82 team was very good and would have fared very well in a play-off.
>I agree with you on the '86 championship team though.
>
>Rajiv
>


  I think Rajiv had better look some things up.  In 1982 neither West Virginia
nor Syracuse went to a bowl!  Doug Flutie was just a freshman and BC was not
that good that year, and Pittsburgh under Dan Marino were no real power.
yes, they did beat Nebraska, Georgia and Alabama that year, but when was the
last time Nebraska won a big game?  Miami, last season, beat Syracuse, Penn
State, Florida State and won their bowl game.  PSU just didn't play the
schedule that Miami does year in and year out.  And you pennheads out there,
don't begin to talk about 1986, PSU's BYU National Championship, one game
season in which if Vinny Testerverde wasn't color blind, would have went the
other way (five interceptions come to mind?).
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: manu@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (K. S. Manu)
Subject: Re: Miami Can Not Be Denied!!!
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 03:03:51 GMT

In article <3M6-h5#@engin.umich.edu> chyang@litotes.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang) writes:
>
>	I wouldn't be too sure about that.  PAC-10 defense has been 
>revamped after what the HUSKIES have done.  Now, pretty much everyone in
>PAC-10 plays the same style of defense as the Huskies.  Based on what
>Miami-Arizona game.  I will be surprised if Miami even can keep up with
>Stanford or CAL.   Don't be surprised if Miami does match up with Stanford
>in a Bowl game (Provided that Stanford loses to Washington).  

No chance.. I think Miami is going to stay unbeaten now which means they
will be playing the highest ranked available team in some bowl game
which probably will be A&M or FSU given their current ranking... There is
no way Stanford is going to jump in front of these teams unless they
beat Washington.

>- Chung Yang   

Njan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jim@pustule.b29.ingr.com (Jim Weeks)
Subject: Re: SEC Preview (Oct. 17)
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:48:42 GMT

In article <1992Oct15.024157.3277@infonode.ingr.com>, ellingrw@infonode.ingr.com (Bob Ellington) writes:
|> In article <71263@hydra.gatech.EDU> mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:
|> >I wrote:
|> >
|> >}ARKANSAS (2-4) hosts OLE MISS (3-2) in Little Rock:  
|> >}TV: JPT, 12:30 PM ET
|> >
|> >This is not right - I intended to put the little "TV" marker 
|> >under this game:
|> >
|> >}MISSISSIPPI STATE (4-1) visits SOUTH CAROLINA (0-5): 
|> >
|> >which is the game JPT listed at the beginning of the season.
|> >
|> >However, Nelson Jordan remins me via e-mail that this one:
|> >
|> >}GEORGIA (5-1) hosts VANDERBILT (2-3): 
|> >
|> >was promoted during last week's Arkansas-Tennessee broadcast.
|> >I don't know whether this is a switch or a split broadcast.
|> >Anyway, check your local listings.

|> >                                 "And computer rating systems."
|> 
|> Mark, the TV Guide lists Vandy at Georgia for the JP game this
|> week.  Next weeks game will probably stick: Miss St. at S. Carolina.
     
     WHAT ??? you mean its not another "Razorback Saturday on JP "
   
  ...heavy sigh.... I guess I'll be forced to watch the Vols and Tide..
  sure had my hopes up on seeing more hogs mounted to little ol' ladies 
  heads..NOT !!!

-- 
Jim Weeks                            
Ph. (205)730-4494                     Intergraph Corp.
Fax (205)730-6239                     Huntsville, AL 35894-0001
internet: b29!pustule!jim@ingr.com    uucp: ...uunet!ingr!b29!pustule!jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 02:08:42 EDT
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Best marching band
Distribution: usa

In article <oer8z=C00iUx45v6pn@andrew.cmu.edu>, Thomas Swann
<ts3m+@andrew.cmu.edu> says:

>The University of Virginia Pep Band is the most entertaining (if not the
>most talented) "marching" band.

Good for you you put marching in quotes.  You guys have no concept of what
marching is.

>Anyone know how many "marching" bands have been asked not to return to
>opposing team stadiums?

I know the Blue Band HASN'T, and I take pride in that.  SOME bands, at least,
have some class.

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: forbush@vxdesy.desy.de
Subject: Re: WEEKLY TOP 25
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.college
Organization: (DESY, Hamburg, Germany)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 12:28:11 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.031132.5355@news.acns.nwu.edu>, fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Eric West) writes:
> Doug Azzarito writes:
>>
>>      -----=====< The A.P. Top 25 >=====-----
>>
>>THIS LAST
>>WEEK WEEK  SCHOOL      W L T  Last Week's Results          Next Game
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 8   11  Stanford      5 1 0  WON at UCLA, 19-7            v. Arizona, 10/17
> 			^^^^^
> I can't remember; who beat Stanford this season?  Thanks in advance.
> 
The Aggies!!!
> ecw
> fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: henders@infonode.ingr.com (Greg Henderson)
Subject: Re: Biggest Rivalry in the Country?
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 15:07:46 GMT

>> Maybe when Alabama plays a good team, we'll get to see how good they
>> really are.  I mean a top 10 ranking when the best team you've played
>> is Vanderbilt...give me a break!!

Yep, Bama/UT is gonna be a very interesting game...

>Ken... KEN!! You are forgetting the great, mystical anti-woofing theorem
>(Goobster, did I say that right?).  All together now, lets chant:

>"Bama is an awesome team"
>"Bama is the greatest team in the world"
>"Bama should be #1, that's right, NUMBER 1 bubba"
>"Bama's 3rd string could beat Miami and FSU put together...."
>"Bama's trainers could beat 'Da Bears' (but not Ditka)....."

You forgot "Bama beats their women better'n anybody..."

>(Put smileys above for the really dense)
And add a couple for me too :)

>> By the way, lots of us from Auburn consider the AU-UGA game to be a 
>> pretty intense rivalry also.  Let's hear from some UGA fans on this
>I can't speak for other Auburn fans, but I put the Georgia game at about
>1/200th the importance of the bama game.  How about the rest of you 5 or 6
>Auburn fans who regularly post??  You too Floyd!!!!!

Well maybe 1/50 the importance of the Bama game.  Its always fun
though... you never know when those rabid Dawgs will force you to
bring out the water cannons...  ;)

>> --Ken
>> 
>> AU '90
>> WAR EAGLE
>-- 
>David Swanger,   Auburn University, Alabama,   swanger@ducvax.auburn.edu 
>AU '80 and really starting to feel it

Greg Henderson
AU '88, and hoping to get get more use from the rainsuit I bought for
the Vandy game...
-- 

Greg Henderson   henders@infonode.ingr.com   ...uunet!ingr!infonode!henders


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dkm2@ra.msstate.edu (David K. Magee)
Subject: Spotting the ball
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:53:17 GMT


Oh wise ones, let me in on your infinite wisdom:

When a player with the ball is tackled, where should the ball be downed.

I know that during the Ole Miss - Georgia game, almost every time a UM   
player was tackled , they spotted where the knee hit the ground.  When
a UG player was tackled, it was where the ball was when the player was  
tackled.


Thanks for your input!

David


-- 
               David K. Magee | "Mandrake! Get over here and feed me that  
         MIS Graduate Student |  belt boy.  The Redcoats are coming! "
 Mississippi State University |
     dkm2@isis.cc.msstate.edu |   -  General Jack Ripper, Dr. Strangelove 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: chyang@anaphora.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang)
Subject: Re: The Bowl Coalition fails yet again
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 92 17:07:01 EDT
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Originator: chyang@anaphora.engin.umich.edu


In article <1992Oct14.170415.17413@menudo.uh.edu>, HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.) writes:
> In <1992Oct14.144720.17948@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu writes:
> 
> > wt124177@wvnvms.wvnet.edu writes:
> > 
> > >The bowl coalition fails yet again.....
> > 
> > Boy, I'll say.  They really blew it last season when they failed to match #1 
> > vs. #2.  What a total waste of time . . .
> >      - Pat
> 
>   Sigh.  One more time:  The Bowl Coalition did not apply last year.  This is
> the first year it's rules/agreements are in force.  The only reason it fails is
> because the Rose Bowl/Pac-10/Big-1? have not joined in or offered a special #1
> vs. #2 arrangement.  This year they are sitting (semi)pretty with a possible
> #1 vs #3, but it will not always be so.  I hope the conferences choose to join 
> the BC when the Rose Bowl contract runs out.
> 
> My related question:
>   Did the BC folks aprroach the Rose?  Or did they not bother because of the 
> contractual stuff?
> 

	Actually, I remmember reading about that the BC folks purposely 
excluded the Rose Bowl.  Because, it might give the Rose Bowl a reason to
take the best match up every year, given that Rose Bowl has more exposure 
internationally and is the richest bowl of all.  

	Can anyone verify this?

- Chung Yang 

> 
> semper fi,
> 
> Jammer Jim Miller 
> Texas A&M University '89 and '91
> ********************************************************************************
> * Speak for my employers?  They don't even know I exist!		       *
> *"Become one with the Student Billing System. *BE* the Student Billing System."*
> * "Power finds its way to those who take a stand.  Stand up, Ordinary Man."    *
> *      ---Rik Emmet, Gil Moore, Mike Levine: Triumph 		               *
> ********************************************************************************
From: doli@troi.cc.rochester.edu (David Oliver)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: The Bowl Alliance
Date: 11 Oct 92 22:29:31 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Rochester (Rochester, NY)

Where does Miami play if they finish the season #1, according to the bowl 
alliance?                             
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Subject: Re: Miami Can Not Be Denied!!!
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 14:34:55 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.
Keywords: Huskies, Number One

In article <Bw1J16.5A2@cs.psu.edu> jdh@math.psu.edu (Jeremy D Hall) writes:
>In article <1992Oct12.040103.3040@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>>In article <Bvz4F2.n5B@cs.psu.edu> jdh@math.psu.edu (Jeremy D Hall) writes:
>>>
>>>>Not only have they beat a number of ranked/tough opponents...
>>>
>>>That number would be "two", I believe.
>>
>>Actually, they beat Iowa, who was ranked in the top 25 at the time...
>>
>Oops, I only have the current poll...

Well, we both know by now that Iowa was not a real top 25 team.  However,
You have to feel sorry for the schedule they have played.  Having to face
#1 Miami, #3 Michigan, #??Colorado (what are they now, are they top ten yet??)
a very good N.Carolina St.,  is not a real fun task...
But then, I also think Cal. is overrated, as is USC and UCLA.  
-- 
David T. Meeks                    ||" We are jigsaw pieces, aligned on the 
VMark Software, Inc.              ||  perimeter edge, 
uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  interlocked through a missing piece"
davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||" ...This world is totally Fugazi"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ama9a@curry.edschool.Virginia.EDU (Anne Marie Adler)
Subject: Re: Best marching band
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 15:45:24 GMT

No offense to Duke (ok maybe a little), but I'm in Virginia's
Pep Band, and I went down to the Duke vs UVA game (we creamed
you) and I did not hear any musical talent, and if you call
those jokes, you were sadly mistaken!  My high school marching
band was better than you guys (in case you can't figure it out,
that is nooo   compliment)!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder)
Subject: Re: Goober School
Organization: American Math. Society
	<1992Oct15.061046.13153@u.washington.edu>
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 13:40:57 GMT

In article <1992Oct15.061046.13153@u.washington.edu> baze@carson.u.washington.edu (Behzad Khamneian) writes:


  >  Yeah, Cliff has made the Stanfurd Trees WOOF themselves out of any chance 
  >that they might have had of getting to the Rose Bowl.  Only if we could get
  >some BIG-10 Goobers to WOOF Michigan out of contention, it would be nice.  I
  >am getting really worried about Michigan, since their fans have been way too
  >quiet.

I have heard the challenge, and I am ready to meet it.  Michigan
(woof) is easily the most telented team in the land (woof woof).  And
no matter how much woofing I do (woof), we will still win the Rosebowl
(woof woof) and the MNC (woof.01 x E2).  There, that felt *really*
good!  

Alan "That's just my opinion, but I am always right." Harder
Go Blue!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tremblay@leland.Stanford.EDU (Marc Tremblay)
Subject: Re: Schmidt Computer Rankings through 4-Oct
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 92 18:02:28 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.080052@mccall.com> scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis) writes:
>
>In article <BvsJ67.Jz6@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, yl44729@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Rick Lin(call me Axl) ) writes:
>>Why shouldn't head to head meetings have more effect than the other games? 
>>I would think that from the head to head meetings you get a more accurate
>>comparison of the strength of teams.
>>
>Take the Purdue-Cal game.  Since then, Cal has played well where as
>Purdue hasn't played well.   Just one example of head-to-head games
>not meaning that much over a complete season.  

Yeah, the Stanford-A&M game is another good example...  ;-)


========================================================
| Marc Tremblay                  |  Stanford Cardinal  |
| tremblay@sunrise.stanford.edu  |  1993 Rose Bowl     |
========================================================
From: paul@enuxha.eas.asu.edu (Greg Paul)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Pac Ten review (10/3/92)
Date: 9 Oct 92 16:48:42 GMT
Organization: Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ

>In article <1992Oct5.211204.672@asuvax.eas.asu.edu> kennedy@asuvax.eas.asu.edu (Ralph Kennedy) writes:
>>crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck) writes:
>>> The Sun Devils were penalized 13 times for 122 yards including four
>>> personal foul calls that assisted scoring drives for the Ducks.
>>
>>     After watching personal fouls play major roles
>>in blowing the Big Game for Cal last year and last
>>Saturday's ASU game at Oregon, Coach Snyder has
>>finally had enough.  He's announced that from now
>>on anyone getting a personal foul for retaliating
>>against something the other team has done will be
>>taken out and will not return to the game.
>>

   Well, so far in 4 games this season, the Sun Devils have amassed 
460 yards of penalties.

   I suppose it's nice to seem them leading the Pac-10 in some statistic.

   Anybody know what the season record is for penalty yardage?


--
========================== Will be President for food ==========================
Greg Paul  (Mouser)		  |  paul@enuxha.eas.asu.edu  GO SPARTANS!!
MSCS student, Insight technician  |     Triangle Fraternity
____________ "My words but a whisper, your deafness a shout..." -JT ____________
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college