HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jwh@sei.cmu.edu (John Huber)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Ruzicka Question
Date: 11 Nov 92 16:55:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: sei.1992Nov11.165516.528
Distribution: na
Organization: The Software Engineering Institute


In article <BxInF2.tE@mach1.wlu.ca>, hunt7551@mach1.wlu.ca (len hunt 9208 U) writes:
|> Can anyone enlighten me upon Vladimir Ruzicka's career.  I think he was
|> traded directly from Edmonton to Boston for Greg Hawgood??.  However, my
|> friend insists that he made a stop in Pittspurgh before going to the Bruins.
|> Does anyone know the correct route he took to Boston from Edmonton, and the
|> player(s) involved in the deal. 
|> 

You are right, Rosie never spent any time in Pittsburgh.  After being drafted
by Toronto (early 80's), he was traded to Edmonton in '89 (while still playing
in Czech).  Edmonton then traded him to Boston for Hawgood in '90.  No other
players were involved in the Boston trade.  (Toronto recieved a draft pick for
the first trade)

-Jay


John W. Huber, Jr. - aka Jay   | Penguins - 1991,1992 Stanley Cup Champions
Software Engineering Institute | Pirates - 1990,1991,1992 NL East Champions
SEI 3217        (412) 268-3550 | MasterCraft - The ONLY boat for skiing
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: Perry@mte.ncsu.edu ('da Sabes)
Subject: Re: Devils Tix
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 00:26:46 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.213814.8040@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca>
cs902159@ariel.yorku.ca (DAVID A LISOGURSKI) writes:
>
>How much are the cheapest tickets for Devils game?

don't know
>Also, anyone know how hard it would be to get tix for the Habs game on Wed?
	Considering the place is usually half empty, it should not be too hard.
>
>--Dave
>
>
Bill
From: njs@mrtoad.lahabra.chevron.com (n.j.spera)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: National (ESPN) versus regional (SC) television
Date: 11 Nov 92 20:56:17 GMT
Reply-To: njs@mrtoad.lahabra.chevron.com
Organization: Chevron, La Habra, CA

In article <1drhomINN172@fnnews.fnal.gov>, jeffk@cdibm.fnal.gov (Jeff Kallenbach) writes:
|> While I realize that the NHL badly needs continental exposure (twice as many
|> homes this year as last), there seems to be a couple of serious drawbacks to
|> this years system.
|> 
|> 1. SC/Chicago caried alot more games last year than ESPN is this year.  It
|>    seemed we got 3-4 games every week last year in addition to the Hawks road 
|>    games (lots of 9:30 games from San Jose and LA).  
|> 
|> 2. So far ESPN's coverage is great if you like Mario, Eric, or the Rangers, but 
|>    fans of other teams are short-changed.  I personally would rather see the
|>    Habs and Flames go at it than the Flyers and Caps.
|> 
|> Jeff Kallenbach

Considering SC/LA is going out of business Dec 31 - thank heavens for ESPN!

-- 
 Nancy J. Spera, Earth Model Division   # "If I didn't know for a fact that   P
 Chevron Petroleum Technology Co.       G  Elvis was working in a donut shop  E
 P.O. Box 446, La Habra, CA 90633-0446  O  in Beaver Falls, I'd swear he was  N
 Tel: (310) 694-7761  njs@chevron.com   # driving this truck." Scotty Baldwin S
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: prb@chinet.chi.il.us (Paul Botts)
Subject: Re: Players who changed the sport
Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 20:37:37 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.202153.4588@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:
>In article <1992Nov10.130645.32490@watson.ibm.com> stripsky@methane.vnet.ibm.com (James M. Stripsky) writes:
>>What about the "Broad Street Bullies"?  That was a team that won through
>>toughness and intimidation.  If it moved, they hit it.  If it didn't move,
>>they would make it move, and then hit it.  Even with a few superstars, the
>>emphasis was on team play and discipline.  Sounds like any team that Mike
>>Keenan coaches.
>> 
>
>The Flyers won those Cups in the seventies for primarily two reasons...
>they had a great goaltender, and talent levels in the league were
>depleted as a result of the WHA.  They were an ugly aberation and not
>much else.
>
>Gerald
>
>

I tend to agree. Besides, they certainly didn't invent that style of
play, they just took it to a newly brutal level. If you've ever read any
first-person accounts of NHL play in earlier decades, you'll recalll
that the routine violence of those eras was every bit as brutal as the
Flyers' style. Gordie Howe, for instance, was one mean sonofabitch in
his prime - used to routinely cut people's faces with his stick,
viciously board people just for scoring against his team, and etc. Since
he was around 6'2" and 200 pounds, this attitude certainly helped him
get some operating room in front of the net, which was the idea, and
which helped make him the all-time great that he was. He was almost
killed one year in the playoffs by a savage boarding check, but neither
he nor anyone else in the league thought any of this was particularly
out of line - it was just the way the game was played. The Flyers didn't
add this style to the league, they just sort of "perfected" it. I am
more interested in people who bring new tactical or strategic
innovations to the sport.
From: swann@acsu.buffalo.edu (Stephen Swann)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Nov.11 Wednesday's game of the night!
Date: 12 Nov 92 17:20:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: acsu.BxM5I0.Krv
Organization: UB

In article <1992Nov12.152551.13578@cs.rochester.edu> ferguson@cs.rochester.edu (George Ferguson) writes:
>>Bruins at Sabres.  What's this - the Bruins are actually playing a game this
>>week?  Amazing!  They go off to face the stuggling Sabres, who have sunken
>
>BZZZT. Sabres 7, Bruins 2. Bruins weren't even in it. Bourque looked
>like he couldn't stay on his skates.

So did Oates, after after he leveled himself by running headlong 
into Wood. ;-)

-- 
Steve Swann                 |    Speak to me in many voices; make
swann@acsu.buffalo.edu      |      them all sound like one...  -BOC
From: jeffk@cdibm.fnal.gov (Jeff Kallenbach)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Hawks News 11-9
Date: 10 Nov 1992 03:19:28 GMT
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia IL
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: cdibm.fnal.gov

It indeed appears that Keenan's departure may have a positive effect on some 
of the Hawks.  Some even seemed to receive a new lease on life just by his 
moving out from behind the bench (most notably Jimmy Waite).

I thought the combination of Darryl behind the bench and Mike configuring the 
roster was just about perfect.  Despite his bizarre motivational tactics and 
over-discipline at times, I think Keenan's system and eye for talent are 
exceptional (and this is the world's biggest Denis Savard fan talking).  
Apparently Keenan thought there were one too many links in the chain of 
command, and saw no need to have his organizational ideas filtered by Pully 
before making it to dollar Bill.  I also believe that deep down he considers 
himself a coach and will resurface as such very soon.

I agree that Marchment's minutes are numbered.  Cam Russell and Keith Brown 
will make a solid 3rd/4th blue-line pair when Brown is back.

I also predict 40 goals for Goulet this season.  He was one of Mike's favorite 
whipping boys last year and should play better without having to wonder when 
his next shift will be.

Jeff Kallenbach
jeffk@fnalo.fnal.gov
Physics Analysis Tools 
Fermi National Accelator Lab
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: nlu@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu)
Subject: Re: Oates-Janney Trade revisited
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 02:51:30 GMT

In article <1dsdg1INNbei@network.ucsd.edu> kim@guppy.uucp (Isaac Kim) writes:

>Nelson, why do you keep on making up these scenarios that NEVER HAPPENED.
>
>I said: Trade A help Calgary win Cup => Trade A is good for Calgary
>I never said: Trade A help Calgary; Trade B destroys Calgary; 
>              Calgary does not win Cup => Trade A is bad for Calgary

But by evaluating a trade by whether if the team wins the Stanley Cup or not
will bring this result.  You could have argued that if St. Louis had not
traded Oates last season they would have won the Cup.  If that is true, then,
that causes your criterion to be questionable.

You had evaluated the Hull/Bozek for Ramage/Wamsley trade not necessarily good
for St. Louis, since St. Louis has yet to win a Cup.  To me, this is *not* the
right way to evaluate that trade.  If they had been able to keep Scott Stevens,
for example, there would have been a big difference.
>
>Facts: Calgary makes the trade; Calgary wins the Stanley Cup 
>        => Good trade for Calgary

Hmmm.  Then, trading future considerations for Tony Hrkac is automatically a
good trade for Chicago, since it went to the finals?  Trading Scott Young for
Bryan Fogarty is automatically a good trade for Pittsburgh, since it won the
Cup?

>Again, you have to look at the expectations of Leafs at the time.  Did they 
>expect to win the Stanley Cup immediately after the trade?  Probably not, so 
>a trade which improves the Leafs, but does not help them win the Cup, is a 
>good trade for the Leafs.

I don't see why fans' expectations should be a part of this.  Some fans had
considered the Maple Leafs a major contender following the season they finished
3rd in the Norris.  Just because fans have unrealistic expectations doesn't
mean that the trades are not good.

>I'm surprised that you don't have this attitude with the LA Kings.  After the 

Because I don't have this attitude, period.

===============================================================================
"M. C. Hamrlik: Can't Touch This Lightning."
GO LOS ANGELES KINGS!  Luc Robitaille for Hart!
GO SAN JOSE SHARKS!  Sandis Ozolinsh for Calder!  Jeff Hackett for Vezina!
===============================================================================
Nelson Lu (claudius@leland.stanford.edu)
rec.sport.hockey contact for the San Jose Sharks
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: gak@wrs.com (Richard Stueven)
Subject: Re: Jari Kurri Reborn?
Reply-To: gak@wrs.com
Organization: Wind River Systems, Inc.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 21:06:38 GMT

In article 6668@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu, migod@turing.toronto.edu (Mike Godfrey) writes:
>In article <2B02CA4B.15469@news.service.uci.edu> assist@orion.oac.uci.edu (ASSIST Coordination Site) writes:
>>The Kings transformation can be explained in two simple words . . .
>>
>>              BARRY MELROSE!  
>
>Amazing ... this was a guy who in his playing days was the worst
>defenseman on the Leafs ... and there was some pretty fierce competition.
>
>He's doing soemthing right .........

Those who can't do, teach.

Those who can't teach, manage.

Those who can't manage, own.

---
Richard Stueven        gak@wrs.com         attmail!gakhaus!gak        107/H/3&4

  ####    ####                                                        Shut
 #    #  #    #        Shark attack!                                  Up
 #       #    #        Aaaaaaaaaaaa!                                  And
 #  ###  #    #    Get out of the water!                              Enjoy
 #    #  #    #                                                       The
  ####    ####                                                        Game

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: romano@monolith.bellcore.com (Paul C. Romano)
Subject: RANGERS NEWS: Patrick hurt, Weight possible suspension...
Organization: Bellcore
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 16:57:54 GMT


	During last night's RANGERS/Flyers game, Eric Lindros
checked defenseman James Patrick heavily into the boards, causing
an injury to his right shoulder. At present time, the seriousness of the 
injury has not been announced by the RANGERS, but it is believed to 
be a sprain of the right shoulder, and he could miss up to two weeks.
Also, RANGERS center Doug Weight received a match penalty when he 
crosschecked Flyers defenseman Gerry Galley in the mouth, when Galley was
coming to the aid of his defense partner, whom Weight checked into the 
Rangers bench. The match penalty means an automatic review by the NHL,
and a possible suspension......

Paul
RSH Contact - NY RANGERS
romano@monolith.bellcore.com


_____ _________ _____
\    V         V    /
 | N E W   Y O R K |
 |-----------------|
 |\  R  \**********|
 |..\  A  \********|
 |....\  N  \******|
 |......\  G  \****|
 |........\  E  \**|
 |..........\  R  \|
 \________ ___\__S_/
          V


Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: shadow@r-node.gts.org (Jay Chu)
Subject: Re: SABRES Update: Malarchuk, Fuhr
Organization: R-node Public Access UNIX Information System (416-249-5366)
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 02:56:50 GMT

In article <1663@niktow.canisius.edu> bittle@niktow.canisius.edu (Jason Bittle) writes:
>In article <1992Nov01.211816.29480@r-node.gts.org>, shadow@r-node.gts.org (Jay Chu) writes:
>
>> now.  The trade will involve Fuhr and a top-notch Buffalo center.
>
>does this read to be Hawerchuk, or Sweeney?  (damm, where's a tradeable player
>like Ruuttu when you need him <grin>)

Actually Christian Ruuttu almost became a Leaf last year, but the trade
didn't happen.  I think the Leafs were going to give the Sabres Wendel Clark!

You know, that top-notch Buffalo center could very well be Dale Hawerchuk!

-- 
        ______                shadow@r-node.gts.org
       | |__| |   If it's there and you can see it       - it's real
       |  ()  |   If it's there and you can't see it     - it's transparent
       |______|   If it's not there and you can't see it - you erased it!
From: chin836@skdad.usask.ca
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: NHL team leaders in +/-
Date: 10 Nov 1992 21:36:05 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

NHL team leaders in +/- through games on November 8, 1992

Boston		Gordie Roberts		D	+ 7
Buffalo		Bob Sweeney		F	+12
Calgary		Gary Roberts		F	+10
		Al MacInnis		D	+10
Chicago		Jeremy Roenick		F	+ 7
		Steve Smith		D	+ 7
Detroit		Dallas Drake		F	+ 6
Edmonton	Martin Gelinas		F	+ 2
Hartford	Jim Agnew		F	+ 3
Los Angeles	Jari Kurri		F	+22 (league leader)
Minnesota	Mike Modano		F	+ 4
		Mike McPhee		F	+ 4
		Jim Johnson		D	+ 4
Montreal	Lyle Odelein		D	+15
New Jersey	Viacheslav Fetisov	D	+ 7
NY Islanders	Scott Lachance		D	+ 7
NY Rangers	Jan Erixon		F	+ 9
Ottawa		Jamie Baker		F	- 3
Philadelphia	Terry Carkner		D	+ 6
Pittsburgh	Ulf Samuelsson		D	+12
Quebec		Alexei Gusarov		D	+10
San Jose	Sandis Ozolinsh		D	+ 5
St. Louis	Lee Norwood		D	  0
Tampa Bay	Peter Taglianetti	D	+ 6
Toronto		Dave Ellett		D	+11
Vancouver	Greg Adams		F	+10
Washington	Sylvain Cote		D	+ 5
Winnipeg	Alexei Zhamnov		F	  0
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: psproxto@cayley.uwaterloo.ca (Paul Sproxton)
Subject: Re: Calder: Lindros 
Organization: University of Waterloo
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 14:58:53 GMT

In article <Bx95to.3vt@ccu.umanitoba.ca>, ananda@ee.umanitoba.ca writes:
> 	I do feel that Lindros' chances are hurt a bit by all the expectations placed on 
> him.  I also think there are only three legitimate candidates in the race: Selanne, Juneau and Lindros. 
> 
> _ Ananda.
I don't see how you can possibly leave out the Leafs rookie netminder Felix Potvin.  Felix was the best rookie and best goalie winner in the AHL last year.  He has gotten his chance now with both Fuhr and Wamsley injured and come up sparkling.  He singlehandely beat Lemieux and the Penguins on Saturday night.  He has an average on well under 3.00 about 2.80 I think.  His play will probably spell the end of Fuhr's reign as the number 1 Leaf goalie.  Fuhr will more than likely be traded when he gets back.  F




elix has played every minute of the Leafs games since Fuhr went down(approx 10 games ago).  Only in one game has Potvin allowed more than 4 goals and that was when the Toronto defense decided to take the night off.  Just some insight on the pleasure Leaf fans have had lately watching our new goalie.
-- 
Paul Sproxton
psproxto@descartes.uwaterloo.ca

Leafs to the cup in '93!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: harrison@mpr.ca (Jeff Harrison)
Subject: True fans
Organization: MPR Teltech Ltd., Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 18:49:40 GMT

In article <92309.130943RAP115@psuvm.psu.edu> RAP115@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>   Some fan you are, you like other people who mock your fav. team's nickname.

I'm sorry. I can't let this one go. I quietly sit in the background
posting Canuck stats, avoiding the flame wars and Pen propoganda.
But, Rob, you have absolutely no right to question the loyalty
someone holds to a team. Do you have any idea what I've called the
Canucks over the years. They are playing like a bunch of prissy losers
who spend more time bad mouthing the refs than playing defense. They are
a bunch of Canuckleheads. 

Now then, does that make me less of a fan. NO NO NO NO. It simply means
that they are playing like horsepoop and I'm letting the world now about
it. 

You know, I've got nothing against you. I don't know you. But ever since
you've started posting, you've come across as somewhat arrogant. It's
like you're trying to prove to everybody that you know everything about
hockey and are the ultimate Penguins fan. That in itself is not all bad, but
don't ever tell anyone else that you are a better fan than them. 

That said, your posts do come across more intelligently than 80% of the
Penguin bandwagon fans rantings that seem to create unneeded noise here.
I don't understand! Why do you never see someone from outside of PSU or
CMU post a one-time "MY TEAM RULES!!! ALL OTHERS SUCK" messages? It seems
that 99% of them come from these two institutions. I mean, I sit there
shaking my head, wondering what's in the air or water that causes this
phenomena. 

( The above rant excludes the regular Penguin posters. You know who you are)

Jeff Harrison (harrison@mprgate.mpr.ca)

- sorry, I had to get that of my chest. I feel better now. Thank you. We
return you to your regularly scheduled noise.






Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: jggoslin@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Whiplash Smile)
Subject: Re: Rookies
Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 01:16:24 GMT

tvorst@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Tommy Che Vorst) writes:
>Interesting that all of the talk about the Calder is centered around Joe
>Juneau and le grand Eric.... Especially since Teemu Selanne has proven
>himself to be the most worthy of the three so far.
Well I'll agree there.  Selanne is the best of the rookies, but Juneau
is not far behind.  If the Bruins get further than the Jets, look for
a serious contention from Juneau in the Calder race...

later...peace

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  "Only the dead see the end of war."     |        Whiplash Smile    	|
|  "Conformity is the cradle of boredom."  |     BUBBA   Jeff Goslin	|
|=======================================================================|
|		       jggoslin@vela.acs.oakland.edu       	        |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dkrause@miami.acs.uci.edu (Doug Krause)
Subject: Re: IOC ban !!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.olympics
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 5 Nov 92 10:55:23 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.101117.1036@dct.ac.uk> sbsb3bir@dct.ac.uk writes:
#Well ive heard it all now ...
#
#	The latest release from the IOC....
#
#	All 'Novice Amateurs' are to be banned from the olympic games...
#	thats funny.... I thought that was the main purpose behind the games..
#	they are practically saying that want to accept pros...
#	and unless your getting 10 grand for a race ... then you
#	dont deserve to be there....

Maybe they're referring to the "Eddie the Eagle" Edwards type of
athletes.  They want experienced amateurs, not novice amateurs.

Douglas Krause                      One yuppie can ruin your whole day.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
University of California, Irvine    Internet: dkrause@hydra.acs.uci.edu
Welcome to Irvine:  Yuppieland USA  BITNET: DJKrause@uci.edu
From: sbsb3bir@dct.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.olympics
Subject: IOC ban !!!!
Date: 5 Nov 92 10:11:17 GMT
Organization: Dundee Institute of Technology

Well ive heard it all now ...

	The latest release from the IOC....

	All 'Novice Amateurs' are to be banned from the olympic games...

	thats funny.... I thought that was the main purpose behind the games..


	they are practically saying that want to accept pros...

	and unless your getting 10 grand for a race ... then you

	dont deserve to be there....


	i think they should start think about there basic policies

	again. I mean its not winning that counts , it 'the taking part'

	isnt that wat there moto is meant to be...


	so come IOC get a grip with yourself....


	bri

Newsgroups: rec.sport.olympics
From: lhhuang@jeeves.uwaterloo.ca (Larry Huang)
Subject: Olympic anthem
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 18:01:30 GMT


Does anyone know the music/words of the olympic anthem,
the one Placido Domingo sang at the Barcelona games?
From: sbsb3bir@dct.ac.uk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.olympics
Subject: RE: IOC BAN
Date: 5 Nov 92 16:24:36 GMT
Organization: Dundee Institute of Technology

YES THAT WAS THE TYPE OF PERSON THEY WERE REFERRING TO ....

	BUT IF HE CAN MAKE THE STANDARD...

	WHY SHOULDNT HE BE ALLOWED TO COMPETE...


	LIKE IVE SAID ITS COMPETING AND NOT WINNING THAT COUNTS


	BRI
Newsgroups: rec.sport.olympics
From: bjornts@ii.uib.no (Bjoern Tore Sund)
Subject: RE: IOC BAN
Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Bergen
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 20:05:55 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.162436.1065@dct.ac.uk>, sbsb3bir@dct.ac.uk writes:
|> YES THAT WAS THE TYPE OF PERSON THEY WERE REFERRING TO ....
|> 
|> 	BUT IF HE CAN MAKE THE STANDARD...
|> 	WHY SHOULDNT HE BE ALLOWED TO COMPETE...

Eddie "The Eagle" Edwards doesn't make any kind of standard, but that is 
beside the point. According to several interviews given by Samaranch in
the period just before Barcelona, _his_ opinion is that professionals
on all levels not only should be allowed to participate in the olympics,
but should be "encouraged to do so, by any means possible" whatever that
may mean....

In some sports (athletics, Basket etc.) this is already happening, but
in many other sports there is a very close link between being an amateur
and participating in the olympics. Sports like boxing and sycling are 
among these, and also among the sports particularly mentioned by 
Mr. Samaranch as sports were it is a goal to get the top-level pro's
to participate.

If that man is allowed to proceed, the Olympics will be ruined within
20 years - IMHO.

-- 
    ___   ___
__  |__)   |    Bjoern Tore Sund (BT)   Quote: "Nothing!"
    |__)   |    bjornts@ii.uib.no              - Marvin

Newsgroups: rec.sport.misc,rec.sport.tennis
From: alopez-o@neumann.uwaterloo.ca (Alex Lopez-Ortiz)
Subject: Squash racquets?
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 17:50:59 GMT


I saw a prince CTS Extension Elite _squash_ racquet priced at about
$180 USDollars. 

Is tehre anybody out there qith good/bad experiences withs this typ
of racquet and does the price seems right?


Thanks in advance

Alex


-- 
Alex Lopez-Ortiz                              alopez-o@maytag.UWaterloo.ca
Department of Computer Science                      University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario                                                   Canada
Newsgroups: rec.sport.misc
From: vittallo@ssd.comm.mot.com (John Vittallo)
Subject: HOLYFIELD BOWE HYPE
Organization: Motorola
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 23:17:31 GMT

For those who need more hype for Holyfield Bowe
Tuesday - USA cable will air the last fights of HOLYFIELD AND BOWE
Wednesday - ESPN will air the weigh in
Thursday - Top Rank will feature live interviews with the fighters
HBO also has a special called COUNTDOWN to HOLYFIELD BOWE
From: fall260@cse.unl.edu ()
Newsgroups: rec.sport.misc
Subject: Re: Holyfield -vs- Bowe : countdown
Date: 6 Nov 1992 18:17:45 GMT
Organization: University of Nebraska--Lincoln	
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: cse.unl.edu

raczka@HQ.Ileaf.COM (christopher raczka) writes:

>  stuff deleted.......

>How about predictions, anyone ???


>I will make one, Holyfield will KnockOut Bowe inside Five Rounds

I will make one too,  Bowe in 6.

>chris

 Sean