From: larose@cs.utk.edu
Newsgroups: alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.activism,alt.politics.perot,alt.postmodern,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Homosexuals in the military
Followup-To: alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.activism,alt.consciousness,alt.politics.perot, alt.postmodern, alt.privacy, alt.rush-limbaugh
Date: 9 Nov 92 00:09:41 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - Department of Computer Science
Distribution: world
Reply-To: larose@cs.utk.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: thud.cs.utk.edu
Keywords: homosexuals

THIS NARROW MINDED TWIT WANTS TO BE 'FLAMED' SO,  ladies and gentlemen, Light
your torches!!

In article <matrix.721260216@sol>, matrix@sol.acs.unt.edu (Goodman Byron) writes:
|> Well, for those of you that voted for him the first thing on his agenda will
|> probably to allow homosexuals in the military.  This country is going to be
|> screwed after four years.  Folks I dont think you understand what this is 
|> going to be like.  It will be worse the the Carter administration.  
|> 
|> We homosexuals are permitted to serve with hetrosexuals is the day our military
|> loses the rank of world power.  The will be so much inner-conflict that the
|> military will not be able to complete it mission.  I'm in the Marine Corps
|> and if anyone says that the majority of the soldiers want fags in your wrong.
|> Infact your dead wrong.  Homosexuals will destroty the combat effectiveness
|> of the Marine Corps.  When you hit the beach you dont want to worry about
|> someone grabbing your ass.  Your worried about getting shot.  People say
|> homos can reframe from their sexuals desires, but the a hetrosexual marine
|> cant stop worry if that fag is going to give him AIDS or truck to screw him
|> in the ass.
|> 
|> You people did a real good job of getting him in.  After the liberals get done
|> with America, it will not be a country of prosparity.  We will be a socialistic
|> society.  
|> 
|> Another thing Clinton is about to do is promote the Brady Bill.  That takes
|> your right which is in the 2nd amendmant of the constitution away.  "the right
|> of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,"  Read it.. Shall
|> not be infringed.  James Madison adamantly defended the indvidual right to bear
|> arms by stating: "Notwithstanding the militaty establishments in the several
|> kingdoms od Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear,
|> the governments are afraid to trust people with arms.", he also wrote, "NO MAN
|> SHALL BE DEBARRED THE USE OF ARMS.
|> 
|> Some people would argue but they didnt have 12 year old carry guns.  And I
|> say to you that is a bunch of BS.  8, 9 , 10 ,11 and 12 year olds fought in the
|> War for Independence, the War of 1812, the Civil War and years, even WWII.
|> 
|> The problem is in the familys.  Liberals do not want to take responsility for
|> their childrens actions.  Instead they want to blame societys problems on
|> guns, racism, and our education system.  Open your eyes.  If our children
|> were taught morals, the diference between right and wrong we wouldnt have 
|> the problems were having today.
|> 
|> I welcome your responses. matrix@sol.acs.unt.edu
|> 

-- 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
brian larose  larose@cs.utk.edu   #12, 3103 Essary Rd. Knoxville, TN 37918.

--------  NO CRERF's allowed here --------
CRERF = Conservative-Rightwing-Extremeist-Republican-Fundamentalists
Xref: sparky alt.politics.clinton:15755 alt.politics.democrats.d:296 alt.politics.elections:22588 ne.politics:2691 talk.politics.misc:58131