HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 08:04:09 EST
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Re: Including entries from notebooks in mail body.
X-To:         RiceMail discussion list <MAILBOOK%RICEVM1.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu>
              7 Apr 1992 14:26:30 PDT from
              <GOMBERG%UCSFVM.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu>

On Tue, 7 Apr 1992 14:26:30 PDT Dave Gomberg said:
>But why should what you want to GET have to be a mail from a NOTEBOOK.
>I want to get lots of things.  What about just permitting adding a file
>to the ring?
**     ** ********* ********  ********* **     ** ********* ********  *********
**     ** ********* ********* ********* **     ** ********* ********* *********
**     ** **        **     ** **        **     ** **        **     ** **
**     ** **        **     ** **        **     ** **        **     ** **
********* ******    ********* ******    ********* ******    ********* ******
********* ******    ********  ******    ********* ******    ********  ******
**     ** **        **  **    **        **     ** **        **  **    **
**     ** **        **   **   **        **     ** **        **   **   **
**     ** ********* **    **  ********* **     ** ********* **    **  *********
**     ** ********* **     ** ********* **     ** ********* **     ** *********

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: East Tennessee State University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 13:18:29 EDT
From:         Bill Williams <CMS2@ETSU.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Using MARK, COPY, and PASTE.
              8 Apr 1992 14:54:07 CDT from <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>

On Wed, 8 Apr 1992 14:54:07 CDT Richard A. Schafer said:
>See the CUTPASTE help file for details on how to do all of these things.

Ahhh... I'd love to see it!  Where is my CUTPASTE HELP file?

My MAILHELP VMARC ain't got such thing in it and I certainly could use
it.

 ---------------------------------------
   Bill Williams -- ETSU Systems Support
    East
    Tennessee             (615) 929-6853
    State
    University        <CMS2@ETSU.BITNET>
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 92 11:46:34 CST
From:         Bill Harvey <HARVEY@WUVMD.Wustl.Edu>
To:           NETNEWS@WUVMD
Subject:      Re: mail92 & messages
Newsgroups:   bit.listserv.mailbook

On Tue, 14 Apr 1992 09:34:07 +0300, "Lawrence S. Kalman"
        <VSLAWR@WEIZMANN.WEIZMANN.AC.IL> said:
>On Mon, 13 Apr 92 14:24:57 PST John Wical said:
>>   When I write my own exec and xedit macros for use with mail92,
>>how do i make a message appear on the message line at the bottom of
>>the screen?

>You can't from an EXEC; from an XEDIT macro use the XEDIT COMMAND MSG or
>EMSG.

Uhh...  Are you sure about this?  I would think you could
    Address XEDIT '(E)MSG 'msgtext
even in an EXEC.  As long as MAIL's is the "topmost" XEDIT
environment.

Bill
>- Lawrence
From: COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL (Scott Mattes)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Subject: Dreams
Date: 10 Apr 92 19:51:01 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-To:         Rice Mail <mailbook%ricevm1.bitnet@ricevm1.rice.edu>

Richard,
  That is THE Richard.  How much would it cost to have a site option
that would be used to say INTERNET.ONLY NO/YES Gateway and BITNET.ONLY
NO Gateway?

  I have this connectivity problem.  We are Internet only.  I talk with
some that are BITNET only.  And others that are ambi.  If someone sends
me mail from a BITNET only site their address is of course BITNET format
which gets rejected when I reply.  On some sites that are ambi the users
might not know to change, etc.

  The above options would, when replying, 'fix' the outgoing addresses
such that USERID@NODE would become USERID%NODE@Gateway.  Then the user
does not have to remember to doctor all notes and/or manually fix the
rejected notes.  These options should only be recognized by the MAILSYS
(though I wouldn't argue if anyone saw a use for the user being able to
change their own settings).

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:27:10 PST
From:         John Wical <UNCJWI@LLUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: More: - +
              14 Apr 1992 15:55:54 CDT from <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>

On Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:55:54 CDT Richard A. Schafer said:
>On Tue, 14 Apr 1992 12:54:41 PST John Wical said:
>>I would like to see 'More: v ^' instead of 'More: - +'
>
>There's no facility to change that outside of actually editing the code

If I were to edit the code, where would I start?
Can you point me in the right direction?


John Wical
Loma Linda University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Sat, 11 Apr 1992 01:02:26 CDT
From:         Harriet L Coleman <U35049@UICVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Building indexes

Today I jumped into the deep end, accessed a disk with the vanilla
Ricemail 92, and started using it.
After a few minor problems related to misuse of pfkeys that changed, I thought
I was completely delighted! and well on the way.  All the positive
things I'd read were fully justified and more.
Then I tried to Log a note that didn't need keeping.  It wanted
to build an index, I said don't bother (seemed reasonable to me) and
then .............
 it refused to log the mail.
With visions of my UNREAD NOTEBOOK becoming even more obese than it is
normally, I scoured the documents in vain.   Ran through all the Options,
a few times, in vain.
Then I found old logs of MAILBOOK and scoured them and discovered that
there *was no final answer* to the folks who'd said this before me.
This is IT?
If I won't pay the overhead, and build funny indexes that don't totally
work, then I deserve what I get.  I'll live with it.
I'll never complain, never, never ..NEVER.
I've been doing this for a long time now.

Please, Richard, consider our pleas and let us have notebooks without
indexes.

We can start to hack, but the changes are ever so much nicer when the
author does them (in the right way at the right place because he
knows where it belongs!)
And it's the only* disappointment.


   Harriet L. Coleman                            U35049@UICVM
   Systems Manager, Computer Center              U35049@uicvm.cc.uic.edu
   University of Illinois at Chicago             312-996-2479
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Office of University Computing
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 08:46:06 EST
From:         Nick Laflamme <NLAFLAMM@VMA.CC.ND.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Mailbook abend

It looks like the ABEND is in CMS itself, not in MAILBOOK.  On that
basis, I'd start looking at upgrading CMS, either via COR or PUT.

Hope this helps,
Nick

* NLAFLAMM@IRISHVMA.BITNET
* Dominique.P.Laflamme.1@nd.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 22:32:14 EDT
From:         Stan Horwitz <STAN@TEMPLEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Memory errors and Mailbook menu apparance

Thanks to Nick  and Richard, I was able  to figure out why my  boss count not
use Mail92 from  his account. He simply  did not have enough  memory to build
the UNREAD  NOTEBOOK index  file and  Mail92 just exited  to CMS  without any
error.  I increased  his  memory by  a  megabyte  and was  able  to get  into
Mail92.  This  was, however,  not  enough  to build  an  index  file for  ALL
NOTEBOOK  when I  attempted to  send  a test  note.  The result  was a  nasty
looking Rexx dump. I  suggest that the next version of  Mail include a memory
checking mechanism so that  Mail can tell the user to  suspend a note instead
of just crapping out and destroying the text of an outgoing message.

The second  subject of this note  involves Mailbook. I noticed  that the menu
list  of individual  notes in  a particular  notebook is  sloppy looking.  It
seems as if when a particular column for a note is blank the other columns to
the right of it are left shifted.  This is probably an easy fix to make.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 11:28:39 EST
From:         Jim Ennis <JIM@UCF1VM.BITNET>
Subject:      SIGNATURE always being sent

Hi,

 I am using MAIL 92 and it is always sending my signature, even though
I set the SIGNATURE option to MANUAL by using the SETMAIL command in
the MAILSYS XEDIT file and by using the menu to set the MAILSEND option
for SIGNATURE to MANUAL.  It is correctly set in my LASTING GLOBALV,
but MAIL still sends the signature file.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Ennis - Senior Systems Programmer  |    UCF Postmaster
University of Central Florida          |    JIM@UCF1VM.CC.UCF.EDU
PO BOX 25000                           |    (407) 823-2713
Orlando, FL 32816                      |    "Servo/Crow in 92"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Slippery Rock University - Computer Center
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 10:46:58 EDT
From:         Fran Hensler <FJH@SRU.BITNET>
Subject:      PREvious subcommand

I discard 99% of my mail.  I'm on too many lists and I've become pretty
fast with the discard key.  Often, before the next mail is displayed, some-
thing will catch my eye that makes me want to go back to the mail I've just
discarded.  The PREvious subcommand would be perfect except that it goes
back to the previous UNDISCARDED mail.  I've never had a case when I wanted
to do this.

Richard, would you consider an option on the PREvious subcommand to go back
to the absolute previous mail?  Or maybe a SETMAIL option for the PREVious
subcommand?

Maybe the list would respond with how useful the PREvious subcommand is in
it's present form.

Francis J. Hensler, CDP                     BITNET: FJH@SRU
Software Support Specialist                 Phone: (412) 738-2033
Slippery Rock University Computer Center    PANET:     8-654-2033
Slippery Rock, PA  16057-1326  USA   "Yes, Virginia, there is a Slippery Rock"
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 12:54:41 PST
From:         John Wical <UNCJWI@LLUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      More: - +

I would like to see 'More: v ^' instead of 'More: - +'

Is there an option for this?

Would this be easy to change?
Would a simple change to an EXEC or XEDIT macro do the trick?
Which one? MAILB00K?

John Wical
Loma Linda University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 10:13:38 EST
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      Re: More: - +
X-To:         RiceMail discussion list <MAILBOOK%RICEVM1.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu>
              14 Apr 1992 15:55:54 CDT from <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>

On Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:55:54 CDT Richard A. Schafer said:
>On Tue, 14 Apr 1992 12:54:41 PST John Wical said:
>>I would like to see 'More: v ^' instead of 'More: - +'
>
>Let me discourage that particular change quite a bit.  It took me quite
>a long time staring at the screen to see why John wanted those particular
>characters there, since the second one showed up on my screen not as
>the circumflex/caret/whateveryoucallit but as the EBCDIC not sign, like
>an L rotated and flipped.  Unless you are sure that every person at

  And isn't "- =" CUA?

Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 10:48:56 EST
From:         "Scott Mattes" <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
Subject:      I thought this discussion list had archives
X-To:         Rice Mail <mailbook%ricevm1.bitnet@ricevm1.rice.edu>

  I just tried doing a LISTSERV database search and it reports that

> SEARCH XMSG IN MAILBOOK SINCE 07-APR-92
--> Error: Database MAILBOOK does not exist. Database removed from search list.
--> No hit.

  Was it my imagination that I had successfully done MAILBOOK searches
before?  Or is there a problem?
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 09:03:39 CDT
From:         Len Rugen <C4322LR@UMVMA.UMSYSTEM.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Scrolling, Keys and Cursor position
              8 Apr 1992 14:34:46 CDT from
              <Christian.J.Reichetzeder@AWIIMC12.IMC.UNIVIE.AC.AT>

re: mouse on CUA 3270 applications including RiceMail.

Some PC emulators allow the cursor to be moved with the mouse.  If they
also support ENTER as the right mouse button, almost all CUA 3270
applications work great!  Another handy feature is called "hot spots"
in some emulators.  If the 3270 screen contents are "PF8", "F8" or
such, the respective PF key is sent to the host instead of ENTER.

I've found, that until there is some consistancy in the way mice and
3270's interact, no CUA application can fully support a mouse.

We have IBM's PC/3270 (V1.01) with no mouse support, a PC/3270 add-on
for Windows 3 that I can't keep running long enough to care about,
Novell/3270 gateway that seems to have OK mouse support but I don't
use it because of other reasons and Attachmate which doesn't seem
to recognize the right button as enter but does hot spots.

I have PC/3270 V2 ordered to add to this list...

Len Rugen                                  C4322LR@UMVMA
Sr. Systems Programmer                     C4322LR@UMVMA.UMSYSTEM.EDU
University of Missouri System              (314) 882-9237
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 09:26:35 +0300
From:         "Lawrence S. Kalman" <VSLAWR@WEIZMANN.WEIZMANN.AC.IL>
Subject:      Re: mail92 & log in notebook

On Mon, 13 Apr 92 14:18:18 PST John Wical said:
>   I have 2 nicknames for one person, each nickname with a different notebook.
>I choose the nickname for the person based on where i want the mail to be
>logged, which is based on the subject matter.  This has worked fine for me
>in the previous version of mail.
>   With MAIL92, i find that the mail is logged in the notebook specified
>in nickname number 1, even when nickname number 2 is used.
>   How can I solve this?

This was actually changed as a result of an update to MAIL90, whereby the
header lines are re-parsed prior to sending the mail.  Consequently, the
:notebook selected is always that specified in the names file for the first
:userid and :node matching the search criteria.

Without promising a delivery date, I intend to provide a modification to
RiceMail which will re-parse the header lines only if there were changes made
to the header "manually", i.e., other than via INCLUDE, EXCLUDE, etc.

- Lawrence
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Clarkson University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Thu, 9 Apr 1992 09:14:44 EDT
From:         "Richard Seifert, Jr." <MAINT@CLVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Using MARK, COPY, and PASTE.
              8 Apr 1992 14:54:07 CDT from <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>

     Thanks to THE Richard and Scott for the information.  I will look into
the CUTPASTE stuff further and see what there is to see.

Rich
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 07:25:31 PDT
From:         Dave Gomberg <GOMBERG@UCSFVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Including entries from notebooks in mail body.
              8 Apr 1992 08:04:09 EST from <COTRSSM@SEA04VM.NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>

On Wed, 8 Apr 1992 08:04:09 EST Scott Mattes said:
>On Tue, 7 Apr 1992 14:26:30 PDT Dave Gomberg said:
>>But why should what you want to GET have to be a mail from a NOTEBOOK.
>>I want to get lots of things.  What about just permitting adding a file
>>to the ring?
>**     ** ********* ********  ********* **     ** ********* ********  *********
>**     ** ********* ********* ********* **     ** ********* ********* *********
>**     ** **        **     ** **        **     ** **        **     ** **
>**     ** **        **     ** **        **     ** **        **     ** **
>********* ******    ********* ******    ********* ******    ********* ******
>********* ******    ********  ******    ********* ******    ********  ******
>**     ** **        **  **    **        **     ** **        **  **    **
>**     ** **        **   **   **        **     ** **        **   **   **
>**     ** ********* **    **  ********* **     ** ********* **    **  *********
>**     ** ********* **     ** ********* **     ** ********* **     ** *********
>
>Scott       | No success can compensate for failure in the home. David O. McKay
>Mattes      | President 1951-70, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Is that the voice of David O. McKay?

Dave Gomberg    GOMBERG@UCSFVM  Internet node UCSFVM.UCSF.EDU  (415)731-7793
Seven Gateview Court, San Francisco CA 94116-1941
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 15 Apr 1992 19:14:21 EDT
From:         "John Atkinson" <ATKINSON@KENTVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Configuring RICEMAIL
              15 Apr 1992 17:21:52 CDT from <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>

On Wed, 15 Apr 1992 17:21:52 CDT Richard A. Schafer said:
>On Wed, 15 Apr 1992 16:46:36 -0500 Stan Kerr said:
>>
>>1. Can we recover the 2 lines of PF key tags that used to be displayed?
>>   In particular we feel it's important to display PF2 since it's heavily
>>   used in reading mail. A novice shouldn't have to hunt for it.
>
>    You cannot easily get 2 lines of PF key tags because of XEDIT limitations,
>    ...
>
Gee.  I would refuse to use mail92 if only one line of PF keys could be
shown.  For the person who uses mail once a week, that isn't acceptable.
Our postmaster (who is also on this list and will be reading this tomorrow)
managed to get two lines down there.  Perhaps the key was moving the command
line to the top.  Her real problem is defining PF keys that aren't already
defined.  Quite frankly, I really like the new mail, but since I doubt
seriously that anyone here will ever use another CUA utility, my greatest
desire is to get the old PF keys pretty much back (I miss FORWARD the most -
and I don't mean NextScreen).  For example, in every other environment on
VM, PF12 is CURSOR.  Everyone knows that.  Everyone uses that.  Why would
CUA change it?  Many of our users only have 12 PF keys, so they will lose
that function as it is.  This isn't an argument with Richard's decisions,
but rather with how CUA was designed, which he was right to follow.

I think it is important for those who find the secrets to changing the
PF keys share this with the list, as we will share it if Christine ever gets
the time to go back to work on it (the recent update wiped out her previous
changes, but she knows how to at least get back to where she left off).

I don't think I am reactionary, but every time I press PF12 and get CANCEL,
I get this horrible feeling that I am in PROFS...

(Well, since I'm here,  THANKS for all the improvements and for putting up
 with all of us grateful-despite-how-we-sound users out here, Richard.  And
 have a great vacation!)

 John R. Atkinson                     BITNET:   atkinson@kentvm
 Academic Computer Services           Internet: atkinson@kentvm.kent.edu
 Kent State University
 Kent, OH 44242-0001   (216) 672-2736
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Networking & Computing Systems, Rice University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 7 Apr 1992 16:09:08 CDT
From:         "Richard A. Schafer" <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Including entries from notebooks in mail body.

Gee, I'd forgotten about that: you can do it right now, with the
CUT/PASTE facilities I put into Mail 92.

Quick run-through, using default PF keys:

Start composing a message
Mailbook name
read the item
Hit PF16 at both ends of the text to be copied
Hit PF21 to copy the text to the clipboard
QQ out of mailbook
Hit PF22 to paste the text at the cursor position.


You know, I'd *never* thought about doing that before, but it works!

Richard
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Wed, 8 Apr 1992 17:13:25 CDT
From:         Christian.J.Reichetzeder@AWIIMC12.IMC.UNIVIE.AC.AT
Subject:      Re: Scrolling, Keys and Cursor position
              8 Apr 92 09:03:39 CDT from <C4322LR@UMVMA.UMSYSTEM.EDU>

On Wed, 8 Apr 92 09:03:39 CDT Len Rugen said:
>re: mouse on CUA 3270 applications including RiceMail.
>
>Some PC emulators allow the cursor to be moved with the mouse.
Just for the record ... the 3472G  is a 3270 TERMINAL which happens to support
a  two-button  mouse (you  can  define  the  keys  in the  3174  Establishment
Controller [whatever that is] - I have ENTER left :-) ...).

Christian
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Tue, 14 Apr 1992 11:27:14 EDT
From:         "Nick Gimbrone (WIRDI)" <NJG@CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU>
Subject:      Re: mail92 & log in notebook
              14 Apr 1992 09:26:35 +0300 from <VSLAWR@WEIZMANN.WEIZMANN.AC.IL>

>On Mon, 13 Apr 92 14:18:18 PST John Wical said:
>>   With MAIL92, i find that the mail is logged in the notebook specified
>>in nickname number 1, even when nickname number 2 is used.
I have found that usage of the NOTEBOOK tag in NAMES files just isn't
worth it. You are also slowing mail down by increasing the size of your
NAMES file (single largest slowdown for large collections of nicknames,
the 2 names files I use add up to over 1000 entries and it is quite
noticable how much this slows things down, so I very much try to only
have 1 entry for any one person). You could avoid the problem by eliminating
the usage of the notebook tag and issuing a LOG <notebook_fileid> command
by hand instead. Works like a charm for me.

On Tue, 14 Apr 1992 09:26:35 +0300 Lawrence S. Kalman said:
>Without promising a delivery date, I intend to provide a modification to
>RiceMail which will re-parse the header lines only if there were changes made
>to the header "manually", i.e., other than via INCLUDE, EXCLUDE, etc.
I do not believe that this is doable.  I had added some code to
Richard's old code for catching this, but there was still always the
user who goes to the top of the file and issues 'change
/@/somethingelse/* *' and similar things...  so I decided it just
wasn't worth it.  XEDIT just doesn't let you catch these, so you have
to reparse to catch all changes.  It might be possible to try to
maintain the notebook info while reparsing...
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Sun, 12 Apr 1992 13:25:21 +0300
From:         "Lawrence S. Kalman" <VSLAWR@WEIZMANN.WEIZMANN.AC.IL>
Subject:      Re: Mail 92.01.01 shipped
              11 Apr 92 10:23:42 CDT from <SCHAFER@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>

On Sat, 11 Apr 92 10:23:42 CDT Richard A. Schafer said:
>
>I've just shipped the first major patch level for Mail92.  See the
>MAIL92 CHANGES file (at the bottom) for details about the changes,

I  regret  to  report  that  MAIL92   CHANGES  is  unCHANGEd  from  the  base
distribution (dated  2/22/92). Nevertheless,  a big  thank you,  Richard, for
the prompt shipment of the updates.

- Lawrence
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: University of Connecticut Computer Center
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mailbook
Date:         Sat, 11 Apr 1992 20:39:51 EST
From:         John Hammond <MAILMNT@UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU>
Subject:      Index Prompt in 92.01.01

   Now that there is a prompt for index creation, consider an option to
let us control whether we are prompted.  I'd like to suppress the prompt
and have an index always built.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU