HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: des@frogland (David Shepherd)
Subject: Re: UPCOMING POSTS TO COMP.BINARIES.OS2 (WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 13-SEPTEMBER 19)
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 11:01:34 BST

OS/2 binaries moderator (mikek@miller.cs.uwm.edu) wrote:
: The following archives are recent additions to ftp-os2.nmsu.edu
: (128.123.35.15) and will be posted to the comp.binaries.os2 newsgroup
: this week.  These archives are also availble via anonymous ftp from
: ftp-os2.nmsu.edu in the directory pub/os2/new.  If you have any
: questions/comments concerning comp.binaries.os2 or the ftp-os2 archive,
: please send email to os2bin-request@csd4.csd.uwm.edu.

: Tuesday, September 15:
: ----------------------
: gcc2-222.zip - (REPOST) GCC/2 native-OS/2 C++ compiler
:                Complete header files and library manager now included.
: (parts 1-23 of 91)
: 
: Wednesday, September 16:
: ------------------------
: gcc2-222.zip - (CONTINUED)
: (parts 24-46 of 91)
: 
: Thursday, September 17:
: -----------------------
: gcc2-222.zip - (CONTINUED)
: (parts 47-69 of 91)
: 
: Friday, September 18:
: ---------------------
: gcc2-222.zip - (CONTINUED)
: (parts 70-91 of 91)

gcc AGAIN ???

how many times do we need to have this posted.


ok, so some of the libraries/include files may have been missing
last time ... but surely could just a "patch" kit of the missing
files be sent.

perhaps its time for a new group

	comp.binaries.os2.gcc

BTW overall i'd like to say that c.b.o is a brilliant service ...
just that gcc seems to be taking an inordinate amount of its
bandwidth !

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
david shepherd: des@inmos.co.uk or des@inmos.com    tel: 0454-616616 x 625
                inmos ltd, 1000 aztec west, almondsbury, bristol, bs12 4sq
                1992: celebrate the quincentenary of columbus getting lost
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: redmax@sabrina.dei.unipd.it (Massimo_Alessan Santin 197369/IL)
Subject: Is OS/2 dead (in Italy)?
Organization: D.E.I. Universita' di Padova, Italia
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 22:43:47 GMT

Is OS/2 dead?

Next month there will be the most important computer show in Italy: SMAU.
Last year there was a big area dedicated to OS/2 (the 6.177 LA version).
Two day ago I heard from an IBMer that this year there will not be any
area. It seems that IBM SEMEA decided to show only hardware. If this is
true I think this is on of the worst things for OS/2.
I want to know from IBM if I have to leave OS/2 development.


					Massimo A. Santin

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: d89os@efd.lth.se (Ola Sigurdson)
Subject: Re: SCSI-DD Not Found
Organization: Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 19:46:18 GMT

In article <joiner.716488975@myria> joiner@myria.cs.umn.edu (Jay K. Joiner) writes:
>I was trying to add a Future Domain TMC-850M and Toshiba T3301
>CD-ROM to my existing OS/2 2.0 system and got the following
>error on bootup:
>
>	SCSI-DD Not Found
>	SYS1201: C:\OS2\CDROM.SYS Not Installed...
>
>I had statements for CDFS.IFS, OS2SCSI.DMD, IBMINT13.I13, FD8XX.ADD,
>and CDROM.SYS in my CONFIG.SYS file.  Any ideas on where to start
>troubleshooting?
>
>Jay Joiner
I have the same problem, but with a DPT 2012B controller.
Fiddling around with CONFIG.SYS hasn't helped at all.
What I do is Ctrl-Alt-Del when I get the "Not found" message,
and the second time around, the driver finds the CD-ROM.

Ola Sigurdson | Internet: d89os@efd.lth.se |
[Hi! I'm a mutant .signature virus. Let me kill your old .signature virus.]


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen)
Subject: Re: What is a "CSD"?
Organization: University of Hawaii
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 04:21:46 GMT

Hugh Whalen writes:

> I've been reading this newsgroup for a couple of weeks now
> but I still haven't figured out what CSD means. What is the
> June (November?) CSD?

Well, since it takes time for responses to propagate through the system,
you will probably get lots of answers to this question, each thinking
they're the first to respond, just like me.

CSD:  It's IBMese for Corrective Service Diskette(s).  Call it bug fixes
if you prefer, though in the case of OS/2, the upcoming CSD should be
containing some performance enhancements as well as bug fixes.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jzawodn@bgsu.edu (jeremy zawodny)
Subject: Help Me! OS/2 2.0 just deleted parts of itself!!!
Organization: Bowling Green State Univ.
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 02:18:26 GMT

I am in need of some real help soon!
 
While running OS/2 tonight, I attempted to open a dos window 
when problems began.  The dos window opened, but none of the 
usueal info was dispayed.  The prompt in the window was a C: 
prompt.  Usually, It comes up much different because of some 
specififications in my autoexec.  I thought the probem was in 
memory somewhere, so I decided to reboot.  Upon rebooting, I 
recieved two error messages:
 
 SYS 03146
 SYS 02027
 
Then the machine just sat there.  Luckily I had an emergency 
disk ready, so I booted up to dos so that I could see what the 
hell the problem was.  Upon viewing the root dir on drive C, I 
found all of the non write-protected files missing!  What's 
worse is that I couldn't undlete all of them.  What the hell 
is wrong?!?!  I don't know all what files need to be in the 
root!  Can anyone help me.  IBM's tech support is calling me 
tomorrow.  I didn't delete all of the files, I'm not that 
stupid!
 
 
Many thanks to anyone who can offer some insights....
 
Jeremy  :(
From: hatton@socrates.ucsf.edu (Tom Hatton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: What is a "CSD"?
Date: 12 Sep 92 00:07:17 GMT
Organization: UCSF Computer Graphics Lab

ian@stirling.hursley.ibm.com (Ian Stirling) writes:

>I made the initial suggestion to the OS/2 group to use FTP.  I would expect the
>CSD images to certainly be on the FTP server, as the initial suggestion was based
>solely on providing the CSD's.

One vote here for letting us send in $ to cover media and shipping costs,
because if I were to ftp N Mb of CSD/Service-and-Performance and then
modem it to my home machine, the cost would be substantial - the account 
belongs to the lab, not me, and trying to re-imburse would be an exercise
in bureaucracy I do not want to contemplate.

Of course, I think I *have* the CSD, since I have applied all pertinent
patches. So it would just be the "new" (S&P) package I'd want anyway,
no?
 
It might be nice to provide several options, but I assume this has been
considered. :-)

Tom
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: extended attributes
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 01:28:42 GMT

In article <18gi5rINN7as@agate.berkeley.edu> shyguy@ocf.berkeley.edu (David S. Shy) writes:
>I was just experimenting with some things on OS/2 today.  During the process
>of doing so, I think I might have corrupted some extended attributes for
>something because the system would freeze after i conduct 1 or 2 commands
>just after loading up OS/2.  I had to cold boot the whole system and kill
>the applications one by one from the task list (had to cold boot after
>each kill because the system would just freeze again)  After couple boots,
>i was able to kill all the applications make the desktop look like it should.
>So i ran a chkdsk of the drive containing os2 and discovered that some
>of the extended attributes were unlinked (i think that's the term).
>I used chkdsk /f (took me a while to figure out how to do it w/o os2 spitting
>an error message at me) and converted all those lost clusters to files, which
>i in turn deleted.  i did try to take a look at the files, but they were
>not text files, so i didn't discover anything too informative.
>My question is, assuming that these lost clusters of extended attributes
>were not linked to anything too important which may prevent the starting
>up of OS/2, would OS/2 just rebuild the extended attributes?  Or should
>I reinstall OS/2 just to make sure that everything that should be thre
>is there?
>I am using the FAT setup (convenience purposes).

No, you are OK.

Enable autochecking for ALL your hard drive volumes, FAT or HPFS.
To do so, list all FAT volumes in the DISKCACHE line in your OS/2
CONFIG.SYS next to the AC parameter, e.g.

DISKCACHE=256,LW,AC:CD

and for HPFS in the IFS line next to the /AUTOCHECK parameter.  See
your online Command Reference for details.

This will prevent further mishaps.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST is avail. from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/faq.
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | Or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP").
of Chicago, 60637       | Family Values Means a Job
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: lrj@cs.cornell.edu (Lew Jansen)
Subject: Re: New TSENG LABS drivers
Keywords: NEW TSENG LABS DRIVERS
Organization: Lab of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 20:24:45 GMT

hatton@socrates.ucsf.edu (Tom Hatton) writes:
> [The "new" ET4k drivers] are OS/2 1.3 version drivers patched to work with
>OS/2 2.0, and thus are not an improvement on the Orchid beta drivers
>which *are* being made specifically for OS/2 2.0.

  Whether they're old or new, on my machine they are a DEFINITE
improvement.  I'm one of those lucky people whose "generic" Tseng
SVGA board does some funky things when using either of the Orchid
beta releases.

  The Orchid 800x600 (16 color) driver never did anything but hang my
machine.  The 800x600 (256 color) _would_ sort of work; I'd get a text
screen full of funky blue and green blocks.  Running the vmode program
from the startup folder would give me my desktop.  Of course, if I
switched to a full-screen OS/2 or DOS window, I couldn't get back to
the desktop.  I finally had to give up on them.

  However, the 800x600 "new" (old) 60Hz driver seems to be working
fine so far.  I can pop in and out of full-screen DOS or OS/2 windows,
it doesn't splatter my cursor across half the window, and it seems to
be faster than the stock 640 (16 color) driver.  I'm quite happy
with it.

  So, they ARE an improvement for some people.

-- 
    -- Lew Jansen, N2KNV               lrj@helios.tn.cornell.edu
    LASSP/LNS Systems Manager                (607) 255-6065
    Station Manager: W2CXM Cornell University Amateur Radio Club
            "You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!"
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: simkins@enuxhb.eas.asu.edu (Larry D. Simkins)
Subject: TE2 and Zmodem download
Keywords: TE2, sz, and CommPak2.dll
Organization: Arizona State University
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 21:49:25 GMT

I am having trouble with zmodems transfers using Omens sz 3.18 and TE2. I
have the lattest version of CommPak2.dll (1.02).  I've heard that sz 3.14
should work, but I cannot find it on the net.  Could someone tell me what is
wrong or where to find sz 3.14.

Thank you,

Larry Simkins
Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.misc:30020 comp.os.os2.programmer:4938
From: rommel@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Kai-Uwe Rommel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: Crypt?
Date: 14 Sep 92 10:28:57 GMT
Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany

In article <1992Sep14.053939.4179@unixg.ubc.ca> ochealth@unixg.ubc.ca (ochealth) writes:
>
>Has anyone managed to get Gnu crypt recently added to the GNU library
>to compile? I can compile, using EMX but the test programs claim
>that crypt isn't working properly. Will crypt be added to EMX or GCC/2
>soon?

The GNU crypt routines work fine with EMX (and IBM C Set/2 too, BTW).
The problem you discovered is not in crypt but in the EMX C library. The
particular use of scanf in the get8 routine in cert.c does not work
with the EMX C library. After fixing that, cert.c worked fine and all
tests passed.

The fix will hopefully be in emx 0.8e which is not far away, BTW.

Kai Uwe Rommel

/* Kai Uwe Rommel --- rommel@informatik.tu-muenchen.de */

DOS ... is still a real mode only non-reentrant interrupt
handler, and always will be.                -Russell Williams
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: des@frogland.inmos.co.uk (David Shepherd)
Subject: Re: IBM Announces PC Reorganization
Organization: INMOS architecture group
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 92 10:33:59 BST

In article <1992Sep3.222255.28817@midway.uchicago.edu>, sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:
>As expected, IBM today announced a reorganization of its personal
>computer division.
>
>At present I do not have details on the reorganization, but apparently
>IBM has spun off the Personal Systems Division (with distribution
>mechanisms) into an independent subsidiary called the IBM Personal
>Computer Company.  This new subsidiary will be introducing a new, low
>cost line of personal computers (in addition to maintaining a
>"premium" line of current and future PS/2 models).  This company also,
>I believe, will develop, sell, and promote OS/2.

the news report i read said that OS/2 was remaining inside the
existing IBM division which now is based around high end pc's (?)
and the RS6000 workstations. the usual anti OS/2 line in the
guardian newspaper weekly computer section gloated over the
fact that the IBM PC division could now ditch OS/2.

also, someone from the new PC company (cannavino ?) said that
it would be so independent that they might consider getting an
indenpendent stock market quotation in a couple of years.


-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
david shepherd: des@inmos.co.uk or des@inmos.com    tel: 0454-616616 x 625
                inmos ltd, 1000 aztec west, almondsbury, bristol, bs12 4sq
                "i don't consider myself to be narcissitic .... if i had a
                 role model from mythology it would be zeus" - woody allen
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: os/2 win3.1 support
Date: 8 Sep 92 15:27:31 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Sep6.1480.26637@dosgate> "roger ramsey" <roger.ramsey@canrem.com> writes:
>Martin P. Smith wrote on 09-04-92 regarding OS/2 WIN3.1 SUPPORT:
>
>
>MP>Oh NT doesn't support all my 3.1 apps I'd better get with the program 
>MP>and buy the NT  version. Real smart thinking I don't think !!!!!
>
>But Martin, this is what IBM would have had you do for the last five years 
>until OS/2 2.0 came out...

Why would IBM have you go out and buy the NT version?

(closed-smilied for the humor impaired)
-- 
   |)  David Charlap           "TELEPHONE, n.  An Invention of the devil which
  /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu   abrogates some of the advantages of making a
 ((|,)                          disagreeable person keep his distance."
  ~|~                              --- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Full featured OS/2 with just a commandline???
Date: 13 Sep 92 00:11:12 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1992Sep11.171246.11127@nmt.edu> jreynold@nmt.edu (John Reynolds) writes:
>I've got a friend here at school who is visually disabled (politically correct
>terminology I assume :-) and is very good with a computer. He's got a laptop
>with DOS and a special AI-ish program/sound board that tells him audibly
>what's on the screen. He says the company which makes the boards/software
>are working on a OS/2 2.0 version (available in jan.), and he really wants
>to go to OS/2 (obviously a smart individual). My question is this:
>How can he load cmd.exe (or 4os2.exe) (sound board/software only works in
>text mode of course) and be able to task switch, etc. in OS/2. I realize that
>he won't be able to run PM apps (or want to), but he want's to be able to
>do things like format disks in the background, and compile in the background,
>etc. (the things that make life worth living...:-).
>I'm *relatively* new to OS/2, and I don't know how to do this sort of
>thing....PLEASE HELP!!!! 

He has at least two options.

One is to keep on using what he is using.  In principle it should
still work in a DOS session under OS/2 2.0 (perhaps a specific DOS
session).  Create a program object which starts up that DOS session,
then drag a shadow of it to the Startup folder.  Of course, that
doesn't really help take advantage of any OS/2 2.0 special features.

The second option might involve a bit of cash, but it is going to be
an absolutely terrific solution.  IBM now offers a product called
Screen Reader/PM for OS/2 2.0.  This dandy product allows a vision
impaired user to operate OS/2 2.0, INCLUDING the Workplace Shell.  As
the user moves the mouse, audible clues are given (e.g. "Shredder" if
the mouse pointer is moved over the Shredder).  The downside is that
this software is a bit pricey (at about $700 retail), but I understand
there are substantial discounts available (educational pricing, for
example).

If your friend wants to be able to run GUI programs (like all his
friends, no doubt), Screen Reader/PM is certainly worth investigating.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST is avail. from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/faq.
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | Or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP").
of Chicago, 60637       | Family Values Means a Job
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: hafting@Lise.Unit.NO (Helge Hafting)
Subject: Re: Unix CTRL-Z and bg command
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 11:22:06 GMT

In article <BuB1q6.LDA@cs.vu.nl>, cpbaltus@cs.vu.nl (Baltus CPS) writes:
 > Hi, on unix i always use (after starting up a task and finding that it
 > takes too much time to wait for) ^Z and bg to set the task to the background
 >  
 > Does something similar exist within OS/2 (no start or detach)?
 > 
 > 
 > 			Stefan.
There are no such thing in os/2.  Bring up a new window instead.
You could also take a look at the different ftp-sites for os/2.
Many people have wanted job control similar to unix, maybe someone has ported
a unix shell by now.
-- 
 |  |      ^         |  |      /   ^   o
 |__| _   /|  _  _   |__| _   /|  /|   |    _   _
 |  |/_| / | / \/_|  |  |/ | /-+-/-+- /| /|/ | / \
 |  |\__/  |/\_/\_   |  |\_|/  |   \_/ |/ |  |/\_/
            __/                /              __/
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jdecarlo@mitre.org (John DeCarlo)
Subject: Re: Just what IS Alt-F1 (was Re: Multiple Desktops....)
Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean  VA
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 12:27:21 GMT

In article <JEFF.92Sep3163618@claw.clearpoint.com>
 jeff@claw.clearpoint.com (Jeffrey J. Griglack) writes:

>On 3 Sep 92 12:32:16 GMT, Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz said:
>
>S> It restores the os2.ini, os2sys.ini and config.sys files from the
>S> C:\os2\install directory where they are put at install time, to the C:\os2
>S> directory where they are used. The effect of this is to return the OS/2
>S> desktop to the default.
>
>If the files come from c:\o2\install, couldn't you just modify the
>files there to be a working, but later than initial install, version?
>This would keep you from having to start everything from scratch each
>time you tried something new and screwed up.

And this is exactly what IBM recommends in the applicable Red Book.  They 
recommend that the first line of CONFIG.SYS be an XCOPY of the *.ini files 
into the INSTALL directory.  Then they recommend that STARTUP.CMD copy 
the .INI files into .1, .2, and .3 versions so you have several versions 
back, in case the most recent one is corrupted.

John DeCarlo, MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA--My views are my own
Fidonet:  1:109/131  Internet:  jdecarlo@mitre.org
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: css0860@zeus.tamu.edu (CSS)
Subject: Plus signs in tree view of disk
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Reply-To: css0860@zeus.tamu.edu
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 06:52:00 GMT


Sorry if this is in the faq.  Plus signs on folders in tree view
of drive C don't always show up.  Is there a way to fix this?
Un-reproduceable...random

-steve

---------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Steven Suehs, a Texas A&M University Biochem/Computer Sci Major
whose opinions probably are not shared by Academic Computing Services.
Dick Clark did not say "I think, therefore I am!"  It was Descartes
who walked into a bar and was asked "Have a beer, sire?"
"I think not."  >poof< and he was gone.
 .signature.virus--.signature.reverse.transcriptase
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: des@frogland.inmos.co.uk (David Shepherd)
Subject: Re: Why I love OS/2. (Kids, try this at home!)
Organization: INMOS architecture group
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 16:58:18 BST

In article <1992Sep11.164048.10925@nmt.edu>, jreynold@nmt.edu (John Reynolds) writes:
>Yes, this is *cool*, and shows OS/2's "stuff", but I have a burning
>question. How did the WPS restart itself? I posted a question a while back
>about the same topic and got no response. Is there a special parameter or
>config.sys directive to add or what?

i think OS/2 is configured so that whenever the process that is run
as WPSHELL (may have the wrong name here) from CONFIG.SYS terminates
then it is restarted. The shutdown option in WPS is a special case
which bypasses the restart.

This is why if you run CMD.EXE as the WPSHELL to reduce the overhead
caused by WPS then when you EXIT from it the CMD shell restarts
rather than the intuitive behaviour of shutting down OS/2!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
david shepherd: des@inmos.co.uk or des@inmos.com    tel: 0454-616616 x 625
                inmos ltd, 1000 aztec west, almondsbury, bristol, bs12 4sq
                1992: celebrate the quincentenary of columbus getting lost
From: mmtl@hobson.cc.flinders.edu.au (T.Lampre)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: GCC stdio.h
Date: 7 Sep 92 01:01:17 GMT
Organization: Flinders University

In article <1992Sep04.230412.3018362@locus.com> gvoon@locus.com (George Voon) writes:
>I'm having trouble compiling with the GNU C compiler from comp.binaries.os2.
>When I included stdio.h, it gave me errors saying that sys/cdefs.h and
>machine/ansi.h were missing.  When I commented those out, I got a lot of
>parse errors.  What am I doing wrong?  Thanks ahead of time for any advice.
>BTW, this is compiling the sample1.c from the package.
>

You are not doing anything wrong. The original fault was mine when I
messed up zoo'ing the sys/* (and other) subdirectories in the header
files. The moderator of c.b.os2 also missed the error when he tested
it.

If you have the headers from gcc/2 2.1 use those. If you have ftp
access you can get them from:

	ftp-os2.nmsu.edu:/pub/os2/2.0/programming/gcc2-2.2.2/gcchdr.zoo

If you don't have ftp then you will need to use an ftp-mail server (I
don't know how, I think the FAQ lists some).

A repost probably isn't necessary unless many people have problems and
can't get them any other way.


Trevor Lampre
<mmtl@cc.flinders.edu.au>
Flinders University of South Australia
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: djr48312@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (X X)
Subject: Does OS/2 support v32bis/v42bis modems
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 03:05:36 GMT

I plan on betting a 14.4k modem with v42bis and want to use the entire
54,600 baud if possible.  Havent installed os/2 yet, but this could
make my choice on whether I buy the product or not.  If it does not
are there some kind of driver I will need?
From: jks4675@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: SUPREM-3 on OS/2???
Date: 14 Sep 92 07:25:37 GMT
Reply-To: jks4675@ritvax.isc.rit.edu
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology

I've heard a rumor that there is a PC version of SUPREM. Will it run
on OS/2 2.0??
Should I run out and buy 16MB (more) of RAM to use this program?
Any comments???

Thanks,
Jeff