From: robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu (John G. Robinson)
Subject: Re: Tales From the Crypt
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 13:38:29 GMT
X-Posted-From: psy7.psy.utexas.edu
X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

In article <1992Sep8.210920.21098@crd.ge.com>, keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James
G Keegan Jr) writes:
> 
> robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu (John G. Robinson) writes:

> -> > keep working at it. don't let failures
> -> 
> -> [read: censorship]
> 
> [read: failures]

[read: Keegs sure can scream loudly when he wants to...]

> unlike kebbin, mr. robinson has yet to earn the
> reputation of rewriting the posts he replies to,
> although this was a good beginning.

pot...kettl...ah, forget it.

Might I ask though, if you're ticked about something I wrote, and, granted,
I have seen how adept you are with the razor blade in your followups,
couldn't you at least show the common sense to quote the part that's
pissing you off?  Or are you really too idiotic?

> -> > naughty, naughty. you're supposed to do your own
> -> > homework before you foolishly post.
> -> 
> -> From what I've seen of you, I'll take that to mean
> -> that you've had this problem your entire life.
> 
> why don't you take it to mean "you're supposed to do your own
> homework before you foolishly post?" after all, that's
> what it said.

Because that would be taking it to mean absolutely nothing coherent.  I had
been giving you the benefit of at least a modicum of logical thought. 
Obviously I overestimated you.

> -> No doubt you favor the submissive role in your
> -> bondage dabblings...
> 
> is this something you've been fantasizing about?

Ah, yes, the time-worn "i know you are etc." ploy that we have all come to
know and loathe. Yeah, I really _did_ overestimate you.

> -> I never had to put up with you
> -> before, and I would have liked to keep it that way;
> 
> then it's too bad you foolishly began to post.

Actually what's too bad is the fact that you imagined an opportunity for a
little poontang and stuck your nose in where it doesn't belong.  What's the
matter, kebbin-bashing getting a little boring?

> -> Allow me to clue you in on a little secret: Trish is
> -> _not_ going to make a road trip to jump your bones
> -> simply because you come in on her behalf in a
> -> side-thread in alt.flame.
> 
> of course she wouldn't. were she to do that, she'd have
> much more substantial reasons.  

"Blaaat!  I am the Raaaam of the Herd!"  You are about as readable as a
book, Jimmy-boy.

> we already know that
> she's decided you're of no interest, don't we?

Would that it were so; I would like nothing better than for her to get her
sniveling carcass out of here; it seems, though, that she has an
uncontrollable urge to stick her nose in and sniff around every few days.

> -> Your "friends" in the abortion debate do not value
> -> you
> 
> which "friends" are those? what are their names? are
> you emulating kebbin and reading their minds too?

I am referring to the folks whom you pathetically brown-nose in an attempt
to draw attention to yourself.  This is a theory based on your simpering,
sycophantic posts in the D'arse thread.  Would you care to refute it?  Are
you capable of refuting _anything_?

> remember when you used to post, john? you were the
> target of much of the derision now directed at kebbin.
> why don't you start posting again. i'll bet, if you do,
> you'll make kebbin happy.

Do you even know who the hell I am, you addle-brained shit-wit?  Have you
been blathering so much that all the net people are running together in
what passes for your mind?  Seems as if you could do a little homework of
your own.

**********
John G. Robinson
robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame