HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: root@edfd.uucp (Operator)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: TCPIPs ansiterm and termcap entry ?
Keywords: ansiterm TCPIP termcap
Date: 22 Jul 92 13:38:54 GMT
Organization: EDAG, ENGINEERING + DESGIN AG, Fulda, FRG


Hi guys!
I tested the different terminal emulations included in
IBMS TCPIP 1.2.1. First I thought that they all were quit
slow. I found out that using telnet vt220 and vt100 is very slow.
Then I saw the speed of ansiterm and tn is ok. Now I need a 
termcap/terminfo entry for the ansiterm emulation that is working
correctly. I want to use vi on the unix workstations I am
connected to. The orginal entrys of ansi on our suns, silicon graphics,
RS6000 are not ok. I built a terminfoentry for an ansi term
emulation which nearly is working good. Only if I delete one line
in vi the screen does not show what I have done. Does anyone have
a proper entry ? Why are the other emulations so slow? I can use
vi with vt100 emulation but it is very slow. Any opinions,
suggestions ?
From: edfd.uucp!root@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: TCPIPs ansiterm and termcap entry ?
Date: 22 Jul 92 17:38:00 GMT
Organization: EDAG, ENGINEERING + DESGIN AG, Fulda, FRG
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant


Hi guys!
I tested the different terminal emulations included in
IBMS TCPIP 1.2.1. First I thought that they all were quit
slow. I found out that using telnet vt220 and vt100 is very slow.
Then I saw the speed of ansiterm and tn is ok. Now I need a 
termcap/terminfo entry for the ansiterm emulation that is working
correctly. I want to use vi on the unix workstations I am
connected to. The orginal entrys of ansi on our suns, silicon graphics,
RS6000 are not ok. I built a terminfoentry for an ansi term
emulation which nearly is working good. Only if I delete one line
in vi the screen does not show what I have done. Does anyone have
a proper entry ? Why are the other emulations so slow? I can use
vi with vt100 emulation but it is very slow. Any opinions,
suggestions ?
From: edg@Ingres.COM (Ed Goldman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Question: Using bitmaps for Background/Lockup
Date: 22 Jul 92 15:52:39 GMT
Reply-To: edg@Ingres.COM (Ed Goldman)
Distribution: na
Organization: Ask Computer Systems Inc., Ingres Division, Alameda CA 94501

Hi all,

I got some gif files and converted them to os/2 bitmaps using a conversion
utility, gif2bmp which I got from GEnie.  When I try to use the converted
bitmaps as a background for the desktop or lockup, the image is not displayed
correctly -- it is scewed and wrapped across a diagonal.

I thought that the gif2bmp utility was probably messing them up in the con-
version, but when I use vpic ( a dos-based image viewer ) it correctly 
displays the image and identifies it as an OS/2 PM bitmap.

Does anyone know what the problem might be and if it can be fixed?

Thanks,

-edg-
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: A couple of questiosn on how to ....
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 00:52:50 GMT

In article <1992Jul24.191511.3039@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> sundaram@cps.msu.edu (Divya Sundaram) writes:
>	1) How do I set up WPS so that when I click on an icon it starts a 
>	second session of the object?

Go to the program object's settings notebook (click on the object with
mouse button two then select Open -> Settings).  Go to the Window tab,
and check the appropriate option on that page.

If you want to make a systemwide change go to OS/2 System -> System
Setup -> System -> Window (tab).  Then change the open object behavior
setting.

>	2) Where can I get Qedit for OS/2?

Contact SemWare directly and they will send it to you.  It is
commercial, not shareware.

>	3) How do I edit the configs on the DOS sessions?

An awfully vague question, but I think my answer to your first
question will lead you on the way.  Just go to the second page of the
notebook for a DOS program object and click on the DOS Settings
button.  You may also edit the CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT files in
the root directory for changes there.

>	4) Any tips on how to actually get good info from the help index ?

Do keyword searches.  Print sections you think you might need (a laser
printer helps).  Check "all libraries" on keyboard searches.

>	5) Any recommendations on good communications packages for OS/2. I 
>		have a 9600 baud modem and Procomm/DOS really F*cks things 
>		up - loses characters etc.

I use HyperAccess/5 (commercial) and I like it, generally.  You can
obtain a few via anonymous ftp from ftp-os2.nmsu.edu, including TE/2
and PMComm (shareware).  PMTerminal, which comes with OS/2 2.0, should
not be discounted -- it is a heck of a lot better than Windows
Terminal.

-- 
Get the OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST | Timothy F. Sipples
from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp,     | Internet: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu
directory pub/os2/all/faq, or from      | Dept. of Econ., U. Chicago, 60637
LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP"). | Tsongas > Perot > Clinton.  Yay.
From: heinz@edohwg.UUCP (Heinz Wrobel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: DOS and OS/2 *Already* are Case sensitive!!!
Date: 27 Jul 92 00:46:57 GMT
Organization: Edotronik GmbH

In article <5y!mdjh.feustel@netcom.com> feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel) writes:
>Both Dos and OS/2 already are case sensitive since filenames can be
>stored in directories as lowercase. it's just that the
>existing underlying case sensitivity is not handled consistently.

They are not "sensitive", they are "preserving". The difference is that
HPFS DOES NOT CARE about case. It just leaves those nice looking letters in
there that you have nice looking filenames. If case really mattered then it
would be case "sensitive".

>Providing a switch "DUAL_CASE=[Y|N]" that enables/disables mapping of
>characters to uppercase before name comparisons in DosFindFirst and
>DosFindNext would let everyone use/not use this feature as they
>please.

How could you ever switch? There's just NO WAY TO PUT A CASE SWITCH INTO A
FILESYSTEM LIKE HPFS. Let's say you have a >300MB HD in your business in
some network environment with a case "sensitive" filesystem. You'll never
know if you have conflicting filenames somewhere, e.g. "ReadMe" and
"README". Then you switch back to the case preserving mode and all of a
sudden the filesystem will get rather confused. "ReadMe" and "README"
should be the same now!? The technical explanation is:

    a) Two filenames that are in the same directory would suddenly be
       identical.
       Option 1: One file will be inaccessible forever.
       Option 2: You'll never know which one the filesystem finds.
       Option 3: The filesystem gets confused and dies.

    b) Inside the filesystem hash codes are computed for each filename and
       if it is a good filesystem those hash chains are sorted in a
       reasonable way. Change the hash criteria and you'll die.

    c) Try to backup this directory with "ReadMe" and "README" onto a
       floppy and move it to your friends desktop computer. Which file will
       he get if he is not case sensitive? BTW, can you handle floppies
       formatted with a case sensitive filesystem?

The only way would be to create a new 'type' of HPFS (let's call it HPFSC)
that is case "sensitive" instead of just being case "preserving". Which
incidently leads to a backup-reformat-restore cycle if you want to switch.

THERE CANNOT BE ANY REASONABLE WAY TO CHANGE ON THE FLY FOR A TODAY'S
DESIGN OF A FILESYSTEM.

You can always switch from case "preserving" to sensitive automatically,
but if you think about it, you can't go the other way if you don't want to
change your occupation to "filename checker". ;-)

BTW, if I'm wrong please email me. I'll be glad to summarize. But really, I
don't think I'm wrong. I've been using case "preserving" filesystems since
1986 and non preserving one's some years longer like many others. ;-) :-)

>Dave Feustel N9MYI <feustel@netcom.com>

--
Heinz Wrobel, Edotronik GmbH (ECG018)
FAX +49 89 850 51 25 / TEL +49 89 850 25 20 (HOME!&VOICE, sometimes...)
From: sundaram@cps.msu.edu (Divya Sundaram)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: HELP: OS/2 reports not enough memory!
Date: 30 Jul 92 20:56:16 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Michigan State University, College of Engineering
Originator: sundaram@indian.cps.msu.edu


Hi all,
I came home today and turned on my PC and it startup up OKAY. As soon as
the system Booted up, I tried to run a DOS shell. It told me that there was 
insufficient memory to run my apps! I have a system w\16MB ram. Thus it seems
unlikely that the starup (which contains the color palette and windows clock)
takes up all the available memory. Also in the startup is the utility that 
tells me how much memory is being used.  This utility tells me there is over 
6MBs free - and yet I cannot stortup anything! Not even open the settings for 
an app. It tells me to shutdown some apps and try again. When I shut down the 
Windows clock and the Color Palette, I can run a DOS session.

Any views and ideas are welcome.
Thanks
Divya
(sundaram@cps.msu.edu)
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS/2 and Modplay
Date: 27 Jul 92 19:07:00 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <2178343@overmind.citadel> hertz.njit.edu!dic5340@overmind.mind.org writes:
>
>If you get it working before me, let me know.  I recently downloaded a
>different Module Player (Also DOS based) from the Net, and I'll post
>the results of trying to use it when I get a chance to play with it.

Well, I tried out two more shareware Mod players.  Here's the results:

1) Whacker Tracker (WHACK101.ZOO).  This program seems completely
   inert.  I've yet to try it on a DOS PC with a soundblaster, but on
   my OS/2 machine, the displays updated and no sound came out.  If I
   configured it to use the PC speaker, a very high-pitched whine
   would emerge forth and wouldn't stop until I closed the DOS box.
   The same symptoms happened on my DOS PC (with no soundblaster) at
   school. 

2) Promod (PMOD11.ZOO).  This program may work well.  I'm not sure.
   One other user on the Net likes it.  It's meant for the
   SoundBlaster Pro, while my hardware is the older SoundBlaster (not
   Pro).  If I configure the program for monophonic operation, I get
   sound, but it's slightly slow, and the bass is distorted.  Again,
   this may be because of my lack of proper hardware.

I just downloaded a program called Sound System (ss.zip) from
ftp.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de.  One person on the Net has found it
satisfactory.  I'll report back when I get it home and try it out.

-- 
   |)  David Charlap           "I don't even represent myself
  /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu   sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
 ((|,)
  ~|~  Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: perryd@cognos.com (Perry Devetzis)
Subject: Re: Bernoulli Drivers--What Limitations in OS/2?
Organization: Cognos Incorporated, Ottawa CANADA
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 19:56:31 GMT

 <wild unsubstansiated rumours from Iomega deleted ;-) >

>on Iomega's bulletin board and other forums, but latest is that Iomega will 
>charge $10-$20 plus media costs.  Nobody really knows.  Apparently, Iomega had 
>a similar fiasco over OS/2 1.x drivers and those who went through that are 
>worried that the same is happening here.
>
>A few beta reports have leaked out on CI$, however, and if they are accurate,
>the drivers will support FAT and HPFS.


	$10-$20!!!! or maybe even free??!!!  This differs drastically from
what a phone droid told me when I called them (oh about 3 months ago)
wanting info on the OS/2 drivers.  The gist of the whole conversation was:

	Availble in 3 weeks!
	$100.00 a pop, but I could get them cheaper from a distributor.

	All I could say was $100.00!! I didn't pay that much for the
operating system.  To which she replied "Yah I know."

	If the $20.00 price tag and HPFS is true, it will make
me so very, very happy.

Ta Dah...Perry

Perry Devetzis                           Cognos Incorporated
Voice   : (613) 738-1338 ext.3224        3755 Riverside Dr.
Fax     : (613) 738-0002                 P.O. Box 9707
UUNet   : perryd@cognos.UUCP             Ottawa, Ontario
Internet: perryd@cognos.COM              CANADA  K1G 3Z4
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Deselect icon?
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 02:16:10 GMT

In article <1992Jul27.222919.18278@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> splin@nima.berkeley.edu (Steven Lin) writes:
>Is there any way to deselect an object?  I was attempting to delete all but
>one icon but could find no efficient way of doing it.  I was hoping to
>select all the icons and then perform some mouse operation to deselect
>an icon before executing a delete.  Any help is appreciated.

CTRL-click (mouse button one) seems to do the trick.

-- 
Get the OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST | Timothy F. Sipples
from 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp,     | Internet: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu
directory pub/os2/all/faq, or from      | Dept. of Econ., U. Chicago, 60637
LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP"). | Tsongas > Perot > Clinton.  Yay.
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: HELP!  I can't delete anything!
Date: 30 Jul 92 17:43:56 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Jul28.184852.156135@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> jmp1@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JEFFREY MICHAEL PARSONS) writes:
>I've been running OS/2 for a while and have had no real problems.  Recently
>though, I tried to delete a bunch of files to free up space.  I "shredded"
>their icons and then deleted the files at the command line.  To my amazement,
>there was only a tiny change in my free disk space.  I don't have the undelete
>option enabled.  What's going on?!?  It's so bad now that the system has
>slowed to a crawl with only about 3Mb free.
>
>BTW, so I make myself clear:  The files do disappear, but thier space is not
>freed up.

Deleting icons in the Desktop folders does not delete the programs
they're associated with.  If you want to delete them as well, locate
them in their respective disk directories and delete them from there
(either use an OS/2 prompt or the WPS drive icon).

The icon is simply a pointer to the program.  All you did was delete
the pointer.


-- 
   |)  David Charlap           "I don't even represent myself
  /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu   sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
 ((|,)
  ~|~  Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
From: mstaben@comtch.spk.wa.us (Matthew Staben)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Nowhere directory?
Date: 31 Jul 92 15:55:54 GMT
Organization: Waffle BBS at CompuTech Spokane, Washington

sean@curry1.austin.ibm.com writes:

> 
> In article <1992Jul23.005121.7666@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, dab6@po.CWRU.Edu
> (Douglas A. Bell) writes:
> |> 
> |> Has anyone been able to figure out what the nowhere directory is for?
> |> 
> |> Is there anyway to get rid of it?
> |> 
> 
> Don't get rid of it (if you even can).  NOWHERE is used by the OS as sort
> of a temporary place to put things that it wants to hide from you.  One
> example is a 'Find Results' folder is usually built in there.      You can
> use this directory in your own REXX programs, and otherwise if you wish.
> 
> Generally it is empty, so it shouldn't take up any real disk space.  So
> why worry about it in the first place?
> 
> Sean


I've removed that NOWHERE folder, thinking it was a temporary directory
for the installation routine.  Next time I looked, it was there again.

Now it's just hidden.
 
Thanks,
 
Matt


mstaben@comtch.spk.wa.us
 
- A warning to anyone, still in command...
From: turtle@brahms.udel.edu (Anthony J Collins)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Using CM 1.3 and File Transfer for TSO
Date: 27 Jul 92 17:05:57 GMT
Distribution: comp.os.os2.misc
Organization: University of Delaware

I am using OS/2 Communication Manager 1.3 and the file transfer
options that came bundled with CM.  My environment of the mainframe
is TSO and I am trying to bring a file down to the PC.  I 
continually receive the message 'host not responding'.  Any ideas as
to how I might set up the correct parameters and troubleshoot this
situtation?  Thanks!

Tony
Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.misc:25073 comp.os.os2.advocacy:3042
From: heidt@aio.jsc.nasa.gov (Michael F. Heidt)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Subject: Re: HELP: Cannot install OS/2 - I get stumped after the HD Prep!
Date: 21 Jul 1992 21:38:53 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: NASA Johnson Space Center

It just wants a reboot. Do a cntrl-alt-del
From: "kenneth tam" <kenneth.tam@canrem.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: os/2 ram drive
Date: 27 Jul 92 18:42:59 EST
Reply-To: "kenneth tam" <kenneth.tam@canrem.com>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Canada Remote Systems

-> First, I believe that vdisk.sys is part of OS/2, which is a RAM disk.
-> However, I have not checked OS/2 2.0 for this, so I may be wrong.

I'll take a peek and see if I can get anything working.  Thanks for the
tip!

-> Second, I have 9 megs installed, with a 512k cache.  Upping the cache
-> to 1.5 Mb increases the initial size of my swap file.  Using RAM for
-> cache or RAM disk is a real trade off in OS/2 2.0, and may be
-> dependant on the number of applications you have active.

I can believe it.  Working with 16 MB still doesn't seem to completely
eliminate the swap file -- even though I've set the second number to 0
int he SWAPPATH, I still have a 1 MB SWAPPER.DAT (this is with the
swapper fixed kernal).

kenneth.tam@canrem.com
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario/Detroit, MI
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: msmith@netcom.com (Martin P. Smith)
Subject: Re: Bernoulli Drivers--What Limitations in OS/2?
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 92 08:34:26 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 

In article <1992Jul27.195631.24903@cognos.com> perryd@cognos.com (Perry Devetzis) writes:
> <wild unsubstansiated rumours from Iomega deleted ;-) >
>
>>on Iomega's bulletin board and other forums, but latest is that Iomega will 
>>charge $10-$20 plus media costs.  Nobody really knows.  Apparently, Iomega had 
>>a similar fiasco over OS/2 1.x drivers and those who went through that are 
>>worried that the same is happening here.
>>
>>A few beta reports have leaked out on CI$, however, and if they are accurate,
>>the drivers will support FAT and HPFS.
>
>
>	$10-$20!!!! or maybe even free??!!!  This differs drastically from
>what a phone droid told me when I called them (oh about 3 months ago)
>wanting info on the OS/2 drivers.  The gist of the whole conversation was:
>
>	Availble in 3 weeks!
>	$100.00 a pop, but I could get them cheaper from a distributor.
>
>	All I could say was $100.00!! I didn't pay that much for the
>operating system.  To which she replied "Yah I know."
>
>	If the $20.00 price tag and HPFS is true, it will make
>me so very, very happy.
>
>Ta Dah...Perry


OK here's the picture a I see it. I called Iomega back in March WRT the drivers
bleated and moaned bitch and cried and I got a beta copy ( one of a number since. Before this success I was told that the policy was that for people with the 
1.2 1.3 drivers ( I am one ) the upgrade would be free if the drivers were 
bought within the previous three months ( mine was ) otherwise a nominal charge.

If you have not bought a driver for OS/2 then the charge will be in line with 
thier OS/2 1.2 and Unix drivers at around $80.00 plus applicable Tax. 

The drivers as they now stand support FAT and HPFS via the Iomega card. HPFS
support will not permit removal of the disk unlespt between reboots as unlocking
the disk or locking it does not flush the data properly. I have tried removing
and exchanging disks mid-session and alto 
ugh it works most of the time its the few times I worry about. 

Hope this calrifies things a little. 


MArtin Smith
msmith@netcom.com

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jja@wsl.ie (John J. Allen)
Subject: Re: Impressions of Windows NT
Organization: Workhorse Systems Limited, Dublin, Ireland
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 09:34:54 GMT

ekl@fics.uucp writes:
: 
:    NT is not a multiuser system in the sence that several people hook
:    up terminals and use the system simultaneously. However, the system
:    is multiuser in the sence that it can store several different user
:    profiles, and differentiate between them when they use *one*
:    computer at *different* times.
: 
: In my book, that is not "multi-user", so "flatly wrong" may be a little
: strong. Anyway, it looks like a nice OS. The user interface is not quite

Although I'm no Windows NT fan I believe it is a multi-user OS but not 
in the traditional sense. I believe that traditional multi-user should
really be called 'simultaneous multi-user' to indicate that the machine
knows about multiple users and can also allow them to use the machine 
simultaneously.
From: ccusekh@prism.gatech.EDU (Kevin Hodge)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: The Ultimate OS/2 FTP Source
Date: 22 Jul 92 18:39:11 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In article <1992Jul22.151625.28860@watson.ibm.com> nrt@watson.ibm.com (Nicholas R. Trio) writes:
NK: I think that it's valid to say software.watson.ibm.com will have the
NK: latest patches for OS/2.  As far as public-domain software, I am really 
NK: not set up for it (and haven't done any of the paperwork to allow it
NK: to happen here).

Gee Nick, what are you waiting for?  :-)

   
NK: Nick Trio (nrt@watson.ibm.com - keeper of software.watson.ibm.com)
NK: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
-- 
Kevin A. Hodge                |   "I'll show you a life of the mind!"
Engineering Psychology        |            Madman Mundt
Georgia Tech                  |
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Harvard Graphics for Windows under WINOS2
From: Martin J. Doyle <MBDMD@rohvm1.rohmhaas.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 16:38:09 EDT
Organization: Rohm and Haas Company

I posted this same question a few months ago and got no replies.  I hope
I had just asked too soon and that there are more people using OS/2
now and someone might be able to help me out.

Has anyone got Harvard Graphics for Windows to run under OS/2?  Earlier
versions of HG run great in a full screen DOS box but I just can't
seem to get the windows version to run under WINOS2.  If anyone has
it running I'd like to hear from you.

Thanks,

Martin J. Doyle
VM Systems Programming Contractor
Rohm and Haas Company
Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania
MBDMD@ROHVM1
(215) 592-6865 (Day)
(215) 752-2296 (Evening)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: lermer@theory.chem.ubc.ca (Noah Lermer)
Subject: AutoCad and hardware locks
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 02:04:58 GMT

Hello everyone!

I've been helping a friend install OS/2 on her machine today
(noname '486 clone, 8 Mb, dual boot (FAT) IDE, Trident video running
 just the standard VGA drivers) with a fair bit of success but with one 
problem. She has AutoCad R10, an educational version, with a hardware
lock (a dongle). AutoCad will start up (we've installed the new kernel
from hobbes) but fails to recognise the dongle. It comes back with an
autocad message saying that the hardware lock is not present or incorrectly
installed. When booting from dos, autocad runs without trouble, so I figure
the problem is OS/2 allowing access to the port (COM1). Toggling the 
DOS COM_HOLD parameter has no effect. Using full screen, windowed, boot from 
drive A: DOS all have no effect. 

There is no specific reference to COM1 in the config.sys file. The mouse
is on COM2. Nothing else uses the COM1 port. COM3,4 are not used, so
I don't think this is an interrupt sharing problem.

Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance people...

Bruce Hollebone
mail to hollebon@cemaid.chem.ubc.ca or lermer@theory.chem.ubc.ca
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc