HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: S942438@UMSLVMA.UMSL.EDU (P. A. Lopez-Valencia)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Problem saving to $HOME/Mail/inbox
Date: 12 Jan 93 15:22:40 GMT
Organization: UM ST. LOUIS
NNTP-Posting-Host: umslvma.umsl.edu

Hi there,
 
I just compiled Elm 2.4 (PL20) in our lab machine, a DECstation 5000/25
running ULTRIX 4.2 rev. 48 and although I did not get the error messages
reported in the last weeks, I got a weird bug. Every time I try to quit
using q)uit, and select to save my incoming mail I get something like:
 
Permission to write to /usr/users/palpez/Mail/inbox denied!
Folder untouched.
 
And then it quits without saving my incoming messages, which are kept in
/usr/spool/mail/palopez till the next time I run Elm.
 
I there is enough interest, I would summarize the answers and post the to
the net.
 
Pedro
--------------------
P. A.Lopez-Valencia
Biology Department
University of Missouri-St. Louis
BITNET  :  s942438@umslvma
INTERNET   s942438@umslvma.umsl.edu
           palopez@joline.umsl.edu
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
From: root@math10.mathematik.uni-bielefeld.de (System PRIVILEGED Account)
Subject: Elm 2.4 appends domain name to locally replied mail
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 08:57:56 GMT
Organization: Math MadHouse Bielefeld, Germany


Dear netters,

I've recently installed the new elm version (2.4 PL0). A funny thing
happens if I send myself a local test mail like

   math10:root% date | elm root

and then use elm to reply to that message it will address it to

   root@math10.mathematik

which is not a valid hostname and results in a name server lookup
failure ("mathematik" is our yellow pages domain name). I would be
very grateful for any hints that might help to solve that problem.
I've installed Elm on an Ultrix 4.2a system (DECSystem 5400).

Please make any answers via Email and I'll summarize if there's interest.

Thanks in advance for your time,

	root (hoover)
-- 
"What would they do if we just sailed away?"
root@math10.mathematik.uni-bielefeld.de           ---The crew that never rests.
From: ophof@SERVER.uwindsor.ca (Scott Ophof)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in aliasing
Date: 8 Jan 1993 01:52:29 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


On 6 Jan 1993 22:05:00 GMT syd@dsi.com (Syd Weinstein) said:
>ophof@SERVER.uwindsor.ca (Scott Ophof) writes:
>>There's a bug in the aliasing facility.
>>When an item contains the following header fields ("From ", From: ",
>>"Reply-To: ", and "Sender:"), the full-name is taken from the "From: "
>>field, but the address from one of the other three fields (can't tell
>>which, since they are all the same addr).
>>I'm referring to the "a" command in the alias facility, btw.

>Its not a bug, its an effect of how the names are chosen....

>The 'full name' comes from the From: line.
>The address comes from the last of From: or Reply-To:
>Its as intended.  (reply-to's don't normally have full names on
>them)

I do not agree, and would to see this as a user-configurable option
at least (*not* system-), but preferably just whatever is on the
line used as input for the "a" command of alias.  Maybe the user
doesn't want her/his name there, and there's a definitely large
chance of difference between names on "From:" and "Reply-To:".

Please see this request as relevant also to other instances (if any)
of header-rewrites in "elm".

BTW, I can understand setting a priority for which of "From:",
"Sender:", resp. "Reply-To:" overrides which (as per RFC-822).
Do I understand correctly that whichever line comes last will be
used by "elm"?  That would definitely *not* be according to
RFC-822...  It sets rather rigid rules for these headers.

What surprises me is what seems to me a lack of respect for what
the user puts in the relevant header line(s), considering that North
America is where respect for the other's privacy is of paramount
importance.

What happens if the item is "From: John Doe <some@where>", but the
"Reply-To:" says "Jane Seymour <Her.Id@Castle.Movie.UK>"?
I wouldn't like to see Jane's expression when she sees she's "just
a John Doe", and not even the courtesy of "JANE Doe"...  :-)

I've gobs of items where the "Reply-To:" definitely has a full
personal name on it.  Take any BITnet-type discussion list; normally
it contains the list name and addr, but users can override this to
ensure replies will be sent to them, not the list (especially when
they know beforehand that they are going to summarize or it's not
really relevant (anymore) to the list).

Regards.
$$/


Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
From: harvw@analoga1.mentorg.com (Harvey Werner - AMSD)
Subject: Re: Where can I ftp  the latest/greatest Source for Elm (Version 4PL20?)
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 20:31:30 GMT
Organization: Mentor Graphics
Keywords: 
Followup-To: 

In article <1ifso2INNbrr@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>, jpd@discovery.cl.msu.edu (Joe P. DeCello) writes:
|> If you  can answer Subject, please e-mail me.
|> ---
|> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|> Joseph P. DeCello III                      e-mail:  jpd@cad.msu.edu
|> Michigan State University                      ph:  (517) 353-3027 
|> Specialized Computing Support Services           1:00pm - 5:00pm EST

I would also like to know where the ftp archives are. Please email me.

Thanks in advance.
---
Harvey Werner                                        (503) 685-7000 x2643
Mentor Graphics Corporation                             harvw@mentorg.com
Analog/Mixed-Signal Division
From: alan@comp.lancs.ac.uk (Alan Phillips)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Change of E)ditor needs a restart
Date: 8 Jan 93 14:39:46 GMT
Organization: Department of Computing at Lancaster University, UK.

Just noticed this, with ELM 2.4.17 built to use "uol/bin/ue".

Go into options menu, select E and change the editor to "none". Save
the options, and return to the main menu.

Editor used for mail messages is still "/uol/bin/ue". The change you've
made does not take effect until the _next_ time you start ELM
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
From: heiland@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (david.j.heiland)
Subject: Redirecting mail
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1993 02:47:54 GMT

On ELM 2.4 PL17, October 1, 1992:

Sorry if any of these questions can be found easily in the docs:

Is there a simple way to prepend a path to an address.  For instance, if
I send mail to djh@neptune.att.com, I want the mailer to prepend att!,
since my local machine does not yet know about internet addresses.  I
also need this if I send to machinex!usery and my local machine doesn't
know about machinex.  I don't want it prepended it my local machine
knows about the machine or if the user is on the current machine.

When I reply to mail from users on a system know to mine, the paths
tend to get messed up.  For instance, if userx on machinex sends a message
to me on machiney and CCs others on machiney, the replied to CC will have
machinex!machiney!otheruser instead of just otheruser.  Is there a way
to preprocess the To and CC lines?

When I hit r instead of g by accident (or vice versa), is there an easy
way to get back to the main screen without going all the way through and
then selecting forget, e.g., hitting Delete?

Is it possible to pull up my editor to edit my To or CC list when replying
to mail - right now I have to edit it inline, which usually means erasing
it and retyping what I want, even if I just removing one person.

On aliasing, why can't spaces be used in addition to commas?  It seems that
elm thinks some of my groups are persons if I nest my groups, e.g.,
group1=user1,user2   group2=user3,user4  bothgroups=group1,group2 bg=bothgroups
elm thinks bg is a person not a group.

Is there a way to have a system wide alias file in addition to the private
alias files.  This way only one person needs to maintain the group lists.

Thanks for the help.

--
Dave Heiland   djh@neptune.att.com
From: syd@dsi.com (Syd Weinstein)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Suggestion: new command
Date: 4 Jan 93 21:27:01 GMT
Organization: Datacomp Systems, Inc., Huntingdon Valley, PA
NNTP-Posting-Host: dsinc.dsi.com

In article <C0CGus.JL4@Sweden.Prime.COM> hakan@Sweden.Prime.COM (Hakan Sjogren) writes:
>It would be convinient to have a command (M)ove message to
>another mailbox beeing a combination of Copy followed by Delete

In the beginning, there was the save command (little s), and it
copied a message to another mailbox and marked it for delete.
And the masses cried out for a command to not mark it for delete
after the copy, and lo and behold, the Copy command was born...

Now, the masses clammer for a new command to copy and delete,
ok, lo and behold: the save command. :-)
-- 
========================================================================
Sydney S. Weinstein, CDP, CCP          Elm Coordinator - Current 2.4PL17
Datacomp Systems, Inc.                 Projected 3.0 Release: ??? ?,1994
syd@DSI.COM or dsinc!syd      Voice: (215) 947-9900, FAX: (215) 938-0235
From: ophof@SERVER.uwindsor.ca (Scott Ophof)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: ">From " lines and "corrupt folder" msg
Date: 7 Jan 1993 06:12:40 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


On Wed, 30 Dec 92 08:52:28 EST tom@crc.doc.ca (Thomas Erskine) said:
>In article <9212290918.AA12334@SERVER.uwindsor.ca> you write:
>>On 28 Dec 1992 17:39:25 GMT bvaughan@sheps.Princeton.EDU (Barbara Vaughan) said:
>>>In article <9212280932.AA14332@SERVER.uwindsor.ca> ophof@SERVER.uwindsor.ca (Scott Ophof) writes:
>>>>  [ much deleted]
>>*INCLUDING* not "running off the end of the file"???
>Including two or three kinds of "not running off the end".

Would you please expand on those kinds?


>>If so, then please tell me where to get a copy; it isn't available
>>...
>see the end for archie's answer

Um..  "archie" didn't reply at all"?  Kinda empty at the end...  :-)


>>Of course, using a pager not default with "elm" creates a problem;
>>one cannot issue "elm"-related commands from within non-default
>>pagers.  So one needs to quit the pager to even issue a "reply"
>>command...  :-(
>>Same kind of problem when using an other editor than which comes with
>>"elm".   :-(
>I like pico (the small editor which comes with (but doesn't require) the
>pine mailer.  It can even be made to work on SysV type unixes if you're
>willing to modify the code a bit.

If "pico" is the editor used by the "pine" demo running on a machine
in Washington, then I'd like to refer you to a comment I posted to
the BITnet discussion list CW-EMAIL.  My general feeling was quite
negative.  Sorry, but I've been severely spoiled by a most wonderful
editor which has also been ported to Unix.  And I see no sense or
reason to learn umpteen editors which are minimalistic subsets of
that one editor, and which all do their thing just differently
enough to make typoes (USA-politician spelling ;-) ) every 10 to 20
keystrokes.
That's why I'm asking for any decent method to be able to issue
MUA-related commands from WITHIN the editor of ones choice.
For "elm" (and other Unix MUAs I've come across) it might mean a
totally different way of viewing how a MUA works.  Ie. not to see
reading/writing an item as a level deeper than the index (which
makes inter-communication between levels more difficult if not
impossible in Unix), but all modes at the SAME level.


Regards.
$$/    (F. Scott Ophof  <ophof@server.uwindsor.ca>)


Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
From: tom@bim.itc.univie.ac.at (Tom Kovar)
Subject: Re: Failed compile of 2.3PL11 on AIX 3.1.6
Organization: Inst.of Theor.Chemistry,Univ.of Vienna,Austria
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 14:00:08 GMT

dans@panix.com (Dan Simoes) writes:
: 
: The local c guru said the problem was with the function prototyping at
: the beginning of the program (addr_util.c), so I commented out the
: second function declaration line in there:
: 
: >char *strtok(), *strcpy(), *strcat(), *strncpy(), *index(), *rindex(); 
: 
: and it compiled.  So, do I need to do this for *every* .c program?
: I tried using c89 and xlc instead, but they all bomb out.


  No, you do not have to do it all. Either start the compiler with
-U__STR__, or use the bsdcc configuration of the c-compiler (has been discussed
in this group and in comp.unix.aix many times)

								Tom
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
From: dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (DWT)
Subject: Re: "Reply to *typed* address"
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:58:13 GMT
Organization: Contributor Account at ddsw1, Chicago, Illinois  60657

spencer@ernie.princeton.edu (S. Spencer Sun) wrote in
<1993Jan10.011524.7527@Princeton.EDU>:

| Why not do the same thing for To:?  One extra carriage return for people
| who don't want to change it, and easy access for people who do want to.
| 
| I've always found it annoying to have to save the article and then
| remember to go to the header screen.  Especially if it's a long
| response, by the time I ZZ out of vi, I've forgotten that I wanted to
| change the header :-)

I find it extremely annoying and don't see anything in it to type smileys
about.

| This would not require using any additional command keys and would be a
| very minor change to the interface -- all you have to do is hit one
| extra carriage return, and if you forget, nothing bad will happen, you
| just have to hit carriage return again.

Count me as another user in STRONG favor of such a change.  I've stated so in
previous posts.  It's not only bad Reply-To: headers from mailing lists that
direct replies back to the list (one bit me just yesterday) but also people
whose return addresses are absolutely useless.  I set up an alias with a
valid return address for each such person but the r)eply command doesn't let
me type it in.  Instead I have to hold it in my head all throughout composi-
tion of the response that I'll have to go to the header screen afterward. 
That is very bad design.  There should, and I'll keep repeating this until
it is implemented, be a way to get to the header screen before entering the
editor; exiting the editor right away, fixing headers, and then returning to
the editor is inefficient with CPU use and with my time and keystrokes.

Allowing editing the To: line upon r)eply would go a long, long way toward
that fix.  Including headers in the editable text (as some versions of mailx
do) would be even better, but I guess most site administrators would blanch
at such a notion.

David W. Tamkin   Box 59297   Northtown Station, Illinois  60659-0297
dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com    CompuServe: 73720,1570    MCI Mail: 426-1818
From: vogt@isa.de (Gerald Vogt)
Subject: Re: Segment Violation signal! (INOFFICIAL FIX)
Organization: ISA GmbH, Stuttgart, FRG
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 11:59:48 GMT

In article <1if9mqINNd43@gossip.pyramid.com> bms@penguin.eng.pyramid.com (Bruce Schlobohm) writes:
>In article <1993Jan6.164245.20045@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>, horn@freefall.jsc.nasa.gov (Mark Horn) writes:
>| Hi I just got elm PL20 up and running.  But with that patch I occasionally get
>| the following error:
>| 
>| 	Segment Violation signal!
>| 
>| 	Emergency exit taken! All temp files intact!
>| 
>| First of all, I'm running SunOS 4.1.3.  The only times that I've been able to
>| get this to occur are when:
>| 	I'm reading from my spool folder
>| 	I'm reading a message w/out a "Status:" header
>| 	I'm using either the builtin or builtin+ pagers
>| When all of these things are true and I hit 'x' I get the above mentioned
>| error - every time.
>| 
>| Anyone else noticed this?
>
>Yes, I can duplicate this also.
>I'm running elm2.4p20 on a Pyramid system running DC/OSx 1.1 (SVR4 based).
>I can duplicate this regardless of the pager type (builtin/builtin+/less),
>but the key for me is the first two you mention:
> 	I'm reading from my spool folder
> 	I'm reading a message w/out a "Status:" header
>		(doesn't fail for saved folders w/out Status: header)

Hi. All those who upgraded elm to patchlevel 20 and get a Segment
Violation, Bus Error or similar signal when leaving elm with 'x' may
apply the following patch to the file src/exitprog.c. Everything
should work afterwards. But be aware: DON'T FORGET TO REMOVE THE PATCH
AGAIN BEFORE YOU APPLY THE NEXT OFFICIAL PATCHES!!!

Hope this helps 'til the next official patch.
------------------------------ cut here ------------------------------
*** src/exitprog.c.ORIG	Thu Jan  7 12:13:33 1993
--- src/exitprog.c	Thu Jan  7 12:13:55 1993
***************
*** 39,45 ****
  	    any, and if the user say's it's ok)
  	**/
  
! 	char *msg, answer;
  	register int i, changes;
  
  	dprint(1, (debugfile, "\n\n-- exiting --\n\n"));
--- 39,45 ----
  	    any, and if the user say's it's ok)
  	**/
  
! 	char msg[SLEN], answer;
  	register int i, changes;
  
  	dprint(1, (debugfile, "\n\n-- exiting --\n\n"));
-- 
Gerald Vogt	E-Mail: vogt@isa.de
		UUCP: ...!{uunet!unido, pyramid}!isaak!vogt
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
From: kooper@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl (Rob Kooper)
Subject: Re: Problems in elm2.4 PL20
Organization: Delft University of Technology
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 21:31:50 GMT

In article <C0GKop.DwL@ccu.umanitoba.ca> rahardj@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Budi Rahardjo) writes:
>In <1993Jan6.162803.25156@coplex.com> dean@coplex.com (Dean Brooks) writes:
>
>>2.  Do the following commands exactly as they are shown:
>
>>	a.  Enter elm by typing "elm" at the UNIX prompt.
>>	b.  Hit 'a' to enter the alias screen.
>>	c.  Hit 'x' to immediately leave the alias screen.
>>	d.  Press 'RETURN' to read the highlighted message.
>>	e.  Press 'i' to return to the main index screen.
>>	f.  Press 'x' to exit elm.
>
>>	When I do these exact commands in this order, I get:
>>		Bus Error signal!
>>		Emergency exit taken! All temp files intact!
>
>Hmm... I tried that and everything was okay. No error, etc.
>Sun OS 4.1.2, Sun sparcstation 2, Sun C compiler.

Perhaps we have a different setup than you but when I tried it I got the same
error he describes. I tried it also on a SPARC (number uknown), SUN OS 4.1.2
and default C compiler. Strange.
-- 
Robert-Jan Kooper                | The problem with the ladder of success
    rob@is.twi.tudelft.nl        | is that with the time you've climbed it,
    kooper@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl | you're considered over the hill.
                                 |             -Alfred E. Neuman (MAD #316)
From: rhoward@matd.gatech.edu (Robert L. Howard)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: How to make an alias to a group of people
Date: 9 Jan 93 18:48:27 GMT
Organization: Georgia Tech Research Institute

dps@delhi.esd.sgi.com (D.P. Suresh) writes:

I am assuming elm 2.4 here...

>Go into the aliases option.
>Them m)ake a new alias. Give the alias name, alias full name
>and when you come to the address part, give a *blank* separated
>list of addresses of all the persons in the group (say your classmates).

Bzzzt....the command is n)ew alias.

The list of addresses is *COMMA* separated.

><aliasname> = <aliasfullname> = <address>[, <address>]...

Robert
--
| Robert L. Howard              |   Georgia Tech Research Institute     |
| robert.howard@matd.gatech.edu |   MATD Laboratory                     |
| (404) 528-7165                |   Atlanta, Georgia  30332             |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "See, when the GOVERNMENT spends money, it creates jobs; whereas when |
| the money is left in the hands of TAXPAYERS, God only knows what they |
| do with it.  Bake it into pies, probably.  Anything to avoid creating |
| jobs." -- Dave Barry                                                  |
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
From: earl@rtsg.mot.com (Brent R. Earl)
Subject: 2.4pl20 ate my aliases
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 18:16:06 GMT

I was attempting to replace an alias with a new one, had entered all the information, and hit '$' to
update.  I received the following message:

   Updating your personal alias file...
   Error - whitespace in alias 'tech mtu' is not allowed.

   ** Not saving tables!  Please fix and re-run!

I exited to fix my aliases.text, and there were 9 entries left out of 97, and most of my other
files were trashed also.
From: rob@asimov.uucp (Robert Boucher)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Problems in elm2.4 PL20
Summary: Works on SVR4.0.4, with gcc
Date: 7 Jan 93 15:36:28 GMT
Organization: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

In article <1993Jan6.162803.25156@coplex.com> dean@coplex.com (Dean Brooks) writes:
>Couple of problems in elm2.4.20:
>2.  Do the following commands exactly as they are shown:
>
>	a.  Enter elm by typing "elm" at the UNIX prompt.
>	b.  Hit 'a' to enter the alias screen.
>	c.  Hit 'x' to immediately leave the alias screen.
>	d.  Press 'RETURN' to read the highlighted message.
>	e.  Press 'i' to return to the main index screen.
>	f.  Press 'x' to exit elm.
>
>	When I do these exact commands in this order, I get:
>
>		Bus Error signal!
>
>		Emergency exit taken! All temp files intact!

This works on Dell SVr4 i2.2, with elm compiled with gcc-2.3.3.

Rob

Inet:   boucher%asimov@revcan.rct.ca
Usenet: uunet.ca!revcan!asimov!boucher

     OS/2?  Isn't that half the operating system for twice the price?

-- 
Rob

Inet:   boucher%asimov@revcan.rct.ca
Usenet: uunet.ca!revcan!asimov!boucher
From: devernay@sophia.inria.fr (Frederic Devernay,Thesard,C012,657830)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: how do I set the default Reply-To: field?
Date: 7 Jan 93 13:08:38 GMT
Reply-To: devernay@sophia.inria.fr
Organization: INRIA Sophia Antipolis

Is there a way to tell elm to always set the Reply-To: field to
my full address, like something to put in the elmrc file?
---
                                                             _
 ___________________________________________________________<_>
<_>                                                           |
| |    Frederic Devernay                                      |
| |    Projet ROBOTVIS -- INRIA Sophia Antipolis -- FRANCE    |
| |    Frederic.Devernay@sophia.inria.fr                      |
| |___________________________________________________________/
`-'


Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
From: spenser@fudd.jsc.nasa.gov (S. Spenser Aden)
Subject: Re: Problems in elm2.4 PL20
Organization: Flight Data and Evaluation Office
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 15:28:51 GMT

In article <C0I6H3.Cu6@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl> kooper@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl (Rob Kooper) writes:
>In article <C0GKop.DwL@ccu.umanitoba.ca> rahardj@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Budi Rahardjo) writes:
>>In <1993Jan6.162803.25156@coplex.com> dean@coplex.com (Dean Brooks) writes:
>>
>>>2.  Do the following commands exactly as they are shown:
>>
>>Hmm... I tried that and everything was okay. No error, etc.
>>Sun OS 4.1.2, Sun sparcstation 2, Sun C compiler.
>
>Perhaps we have a different setup than you but when I tried it I got the same
>error he describes. I tried it also on a SPARC (number uknown), SUN OS 4.1.2
>and default C compiler. Strange.

Yes, strange.  I tried the sequence, on a SPARC 1 running 4.1.2, default C
compiler also, and I did NOT get the problem.  BUT ... I use "less" and the
pager in elm, and I had to add a 'q' in the sequence in order to get out of
the pager before hitting "i" to get back to the index.  PERHAPS there's and
incompatibility problem with whatever pager is being used?

-Spenser


-- 
S. Spenser Aden --- Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co. --- (713) 483-2028
NASA --- Flight Data and Evaluation Office --- Johnson Space Center, Houston
spenser@fudd.jsc.nasa.gov    (Internet) ---  Opinions herein are mine alone.
aden@vf.jsc.nasa.gov (if above bounces) ---  "Eschew obfuscation." - unknown
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
From: mktjadx@gsusgi2.gsu.edu (Jeff A. Dilcher)
Subject: Compilation of replies about creating mailing list?
Organization: Georgia State University
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:35:25 GMT


Didn't someone ask about setting up a mailing list, and promise to post a
comilation of the replies which they received?

I sure would like to see it!
Jeff

-- 
 
  Jeffrey A. Dilcher                                   Atlanta, GA, USA
mktjadx@gsusgi2.gsu.edu                             Telephone 404-266-1585
      NSS #25914                                       II Peter 1:10,11