HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: htuttle@nyx.cs.du.edu (Harry Tuttle)
Subject: Re: Dan Quayle My Hero !!!!!!!!!!
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 22:13:48 GMT

In article <92324.212708KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt 
udwick) writes:
>In article <1992Nov16.164632.29867@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, htuttle@nyx.cs.
u.edu
>(Harry Tuttle) says:
>
>>>Say... isn't that, "a beakon of truth," as it was in the official Quay
e
>>>family Christmas card of a couple of years ago...?
>
>>I'm glad that you think he is a schmuck as well.
>
>>We have another convert!
>
>Oh, for crying out loud.  I think Quayle is great, but I still have a se
se
>of humor about him.  Is this something you can't understand?
>
>Maybe it -is- true that liberals don't have a sense of humor.
>
>------------
>Kurt Ludwick
>------------



Kurt, Kurt, Kurt.
 
You know how medicine bottles have child-proof tops so little kids
who don't know any better can't hurt themselves?

Well, I guess my posts are going to have to have Kurt-proof explanations
so you don't sound silly anymore.  (Although I don't know if I alone
can make you stop sounding silly...that's someone you'll have to work
out on your own).

I guess this is how my post should have read:

Hey, Kurt!  This is Harry.  We don't agree on political views.  I know
that you (Kurt) are a big fan of Dan Quayl whereas I (Harry) am not.

Here I go, I'm using sarcasm now.  Note the sarcasm that I am using!
Watch as I sarcastically turn your words around and make people think
that you (Kurt) actually don't like Quayl!  Ha ha ha, pretty funny,
right?  

You see, it takes something away from the tone of the post if I have
to telegraph everything, but hey, if that's what it takes...

BTW, didja notice how I didn't resort to silly generalizations about
an entire group's sense of humor?  P

Pay close attention, Kurt, and maybe someday you'll be able to 
post as well as I do.



Harry Tuttle.
The Man, The Myth, The Conservative-Stomper



Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
Subject: Re: Here Are The Undeniable Truths of Life
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: usa
Date: 21 Nov 92 19:28:11 GMT

In <1992Nov19.162408.13135@dg-rtp.dg.com> crosmun@crosmun.rtp.dg.com (William Crosmun) writes:

>In article <1992Nov18.020350.12683@netcom.com> kc@netcom.com (Dameon D. Welch) writes:
>>In article <grendel.722041805@camelot> grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:
>>>In <69483@cup.portal.com> sjthomas@cup.portal.com (Stephen J Thomas) writes:
>>>
>>>>27. Soviet leaders are actually left wing dictators.               
>>>
>>>Believe it or not, not all Soviet leaders are any one thing.

>All Soviet leaders certainly are any one thing.  Soviet leaders, and by this I
>mean the General Secretaries of the Communist Party, eg. Lenin, Stalin, 
>Krushchev, Brezhnev, Chernenko, Andropov, Gorbachev et. al, are all 
>  1. male
>  2. white

Gee, kind of like our own government?

>  3. Communist

Gee, kind of like our own government is all capitalist?

>  4. dictators

Beg to differ.  From the capitalist POV, anyone who doesn't allow for free
trade, free speech, etc. is a dictator, I suppose, but I see a big difference.
Communist does not equal dictator.

>  5. left wing

Not true.  Gorbachev was liberal, and he met great resistance within the Soviet
government for his ideas from the old right-wing guard, who eventually 
kidnapped him and attempted a coup.

>It's true that people are all different in many ways, but let's not be blinded
>to the ways people are the same.

The first three of your examples of how the Soviet government was all the same
are irrelevant, and the last two are untrue.  You haven't made a case.
From: don@ocf.berkeley.edu (Don Bromley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Liberals DO oppose First Amendment rights
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Date: 21 Nov 1992 09:23:22 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandstorm.berkeley.edu

[text deleted]

>     >posting proposing the rmgroup of alt.rush-limbaugh. In my experience
>     >liberals have been quite forthright in defense of the First Amendment.
>     >
>     >Perhaps you can point out a few opposing examples for us?
>
  Here at UC Berkeley "hate speech" is against university rules.  A
  student here was recently kicked out of his dorm because he made an
  anti-gay remark.  When Bruce Herschensohn came to give a talk here
  on campus, the Cal-Democrats popped balloons, shouted names, and
  didn't give him a chance to respond when the audience asked 
  questions.  Free speech only applies to non-conservatives on this
  campus.

					-Don Bromley
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
From: budd@playfair.Stanford.EDU (David Budd)
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 08:46:22 GMT

In article <grendel.722305682@camelot> grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea) writes:
>In <1992Nov20.230532.24506@rchland.ibm.com> jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Nov17.162705.24794@galileo.physics.arizona.edu>, krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes: 
>>|> But he has already promised to screw up, by saying that he will remove 
>>|> the ban on gays in the military, etc.  I have not heard one of his 100 
>>|> day promises which is not a screw up, at least IMO, therefore, as far 
>>|> as I am concerned, HE ALREADY HAS SCREWED UP!!!
>
>>As you conservative, apple pie, gun-toting folks like to say:
>
>>"America.  Love it or Leave it!"
>
>>|> 
>>|> Ted (author and originator of the term `Zackane') Krueger
>>|> 
>>|> 
>>|> -- 
>>|> "We will bury you! We will bury you! We will bury you!"
>>|>       - some ex-Soviet leader            
>>|>                    krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu
>
>>It was Kruschev.  And he meant economically bury us.
>
>Who knows what Nikita meant.  But I don't subscribe to this point of view. :)


Actually, I believe that the translation was a bad one. A more correct trans-
lation of what Khruschev said was "We will be at your funeral."
But, you get the idea. 

"I said that Premier Kissof is a degenerate, atheist commie...."

--
David Leung-tak
"You can always tell a Harvard man. You just can't tell him very much."
"A day without sun is night."
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Limbaugh Watch Day 15
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 01:14:57 GMT

November 17, 1992
Dateline - Santa Barbara, CA

It's now 15 days after Bill Clinton's election and Rush is still on the 
air with 532 radio affiliates and 207 TV affiliates.
-- 
John Switzer               | "If you ask me, Larry, the Clinton Presidency
                           | has failed. What has he done? Nothing!"
CompuServe: 74076,1250     | --Dave Barry to Larry King, November 12, 1992
Internet: jrs@netcom.com   | (P.S. Impeach Clinton, support the coup!)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: paT bUcHAnaN
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: thEwIndBag bashes Rev. Jackson, again
Date: 23 Nov 92 00:24:35 GMT
Organization: Allegheny College

In article <1992Nov20.011755.19060@news.ysu.edu> ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley  
Miller) writes:
> 
> In a previous article, leffel@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Christopher J Leffel)  
says:
> 
> >From article <19NOV199211484948@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu>, by  
mitcheec@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu (Elliott Mitchell):
> >
> >[Rush Bashing Deleted]
> >
> >I have no problem that you disagree with Rush...  but I would like to  
draw
> >your attention to the fact that this newsgroup is called 
> >
> >alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
> >    ^^^
> >
> >The posting of such material to this group is just flame-bating...   
Please
> >direct any further thoughts such as these to alt.rush-limbaugh.
> 
> You know, I'm starting to get REAL annoyed at this idiot constantly  
calling 
> for others not to post any anti-Limbaugh statement to this newsgroup.
> 
> This is NOT Limbaugh's monitored, exclusive access radio program, it is  
a 
> public access computer newsgroup, open for all who wish to post.  So  
long
> as folks posting here are permitted to slam anyone who is not a good  
little
> Limbot, resistance and decsent should be expected.
> 
> Further, at least at my server, the alt.rush-limbaugh group is an ALIAS  
group
> to this one...In case you don't know, anything I post there ends up  
here.
> 
> I believe Limbaugh is a self-serving moron, and I will continue to post  
that
> opinion here.   
> 
>  
> 
> >-- 
>  
>-------------------------leffel@csd4.csd.uwm.edu------------------------- 
-
> >"Don't you try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with  
my
> >breakfast cereal."    -The Restaurant at the End of the Universe-
> >
> -- 
> *...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  /\/\   HATE IS NOT A  *         
> *                    Kelley L. Miller  / /  \  FAMILY VALUE   *            
> *                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  / /____\                *  
> *     GIGO: Gospel In--Garbage Out   /______\                 *

Please do because I think you're a moron and I'll continue to say so.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: wicksd@hermes.ecn.purdue.edu (Donna M Wicks)
Subject: Re: Al Gore -VP Curse strkes again?
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:14:17 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.002654.26663@ux1.cts.eiu.edu> cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black) writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.145634.1056@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> walker@superboy.jsc.nasa.gov writes:
>>
>>Yesterday my wife heard Bill Clinton DEFENDING Dan "Mr. Potatoe Head"
>>Quayle's stance and statements concerning Murphy Brown.
>>
>>Argggggg.
>>
>>Looks like you Dems. bought a wolf in sheeps clothing.
>
>    Somehow, I think there's a little something missing from this account.
>Has anyone else heard this?  
>    If it were this simple, the news media would have spread it all over
>the place.  I'd be very interested to know the entire, accurate story.
>
>-- 
>   ******************************************************************
>     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
>     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ. 

   Clinton's remarks are in this week's TV Guide. He did not attack
Murphy Brown, as Quayle did. He said he agreed that Hollywood could
do a lot to portray a more positive image of family life and get rid
of some violence and sex. This is consistent with what he had to
say during the campaign - no wolf in sheep's clothes on this. 

BTW I voted for Bush. I don't believe in comdemning Bill Clinton
on something as small as this. I think this is one issue he
*has* remained consistent on.

*******************************************************************************
Donna Wicks                My life is like a photon that travels billions
Purdue University          of light years only to end up at the bottom   
wicksd@ecn.purdue.edu      of an amateur astronomer's telescope, unseen
		           by the untrained eye.				
*******************************************************************************


Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8625 alt.rush-limbaugh:9737 alt.politics.clinton:17187
From: marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Marc Rassbach)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Date: 15 Nov 1992 18:22:08 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Department MSCS
NNTP-Posting-Host: studsys.mscs.mu.edu

In article <JASON.92Nov13081329@ab20.larc.nasa.gov> Jason C. Austin <j.c.austin@larc.nasa.gov> writes:
>In article <92317.231441MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> Mark 'Mark' Sachs <MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>-> Perhaps my memory fails me, but I don't recall too many significant
>-> instances of "liberals" fighting free speech, beyond a few trivial
>-> Perhaps you can point out a few opposing examples for us?
>	How about the protests and letters to get Rush taken off the
>air whenever he moves into a new city?

Wrong type of example, unless you want to include shouts of
"<protester for cause X> go home."  Where X is the anti/pro abortion/life
crowd, or the no blood for oil protesters during the golf conflict.

In which case, are you not expanding the rights under the constiution
beyond what GOVERNMENT is impowered to do?  (or not do)  


-- 
Marc Rassbach    marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu    If you take my advice, that
MS-DOS - it's not   marc@milestn.mil.wi.us    is your problem, not mine!
my problem!     If it was said on UseNet, it must be true.
   Unix - It's a nice place to live, but you don't want to visit there.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: mk009b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu ([Matt Kaufman])
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch - Day 17
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 07:57:04 GMT

In <1992Nov19.195004.4952@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes:

>In article <1992Nov19.173738.1394@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:

>>It's now 17 days after Bill Clinton's election and Rush is still on the 
>>air with 536 radio affiliates and 207 TV affiliates, and his book is 
>>number one on the NY Times hardback non-fiction best-seller lists.

>It's now 17 days after G. Bush's rejection by a majority of the voters,
>and Bill Clinton is still the President Elect, and Mr. Potatoe Head is 
>still out of a job come January.

It's now 17 days after this country made the biggest mistake in its history 
Rush is still right and Kemp will win in '96.  Take that to the bank if
Billy Boy coes not tax and spend it away from you.


>>-- 
>>John Switzer               | "Lobbyists are circling Clinton like slugs
>>                           | around a saucer of beer."
>>CompuServe: 74076,1250     | -- Alexander Cockburn, LA Times 11/15/92
>>Internet: jrs@netcom.com   | (P.S. Impeach Clinton, support the coup!)

>Tom Perigrin                | "Limbots are sucking up to Rush like pimple
>                            | faced adolescents around Madonna."
>                            | (P.S. Impeach Switzer, support intelligent life!)





Matt Kaufman
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: gonzalez@athena.mit.edu (John R Gonzalez)
Subject: Re: Ever heard of Radical Conservatism
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 14:02:35 GMT

	I've never heard of Radical Conservatism, why don't you 'educate' me
about it?  Can you actually form an intelligent argument, or do you have to state
stupid, abstract concepts of conscienciousness as if they were facts?  What if I
start to quote the bible, it is important to me, therefore it is true to
everyone, right?  No wonder you were to much of a coward to attach your name to
this post.
						John R. Gonzalez
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8817 alt.rush-limbaugh:9991
From: jtinkle@sparc1.sparc1.csubak.edu (j. tinkle )
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why alt.fan.rush-limbaugh????
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:22:10 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: California State University, Bakersfield

In article <1dm6f2INNi0s@spool.mu.edu> marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu (Marc Rassbach
) writes:
>In article <1992Nov9.153906.28199@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) wr
ites:
>The limbots felt it would be a place where FAN topics could be discussed.
     ^^^^^^^
Proof positive that fan discussion is NOT what goes on here.

>Could it be the posters feel:
Well, the Non-Limbot posters, anyway.  By the way, WHO invited these 
Non-Limbots to post on a fan group?  I thought that was what alt.r-l was for.

>Now when you people grow up enuf to break the concept of speaking against
>something is the same as hating it (cuz it's not) then perhaps you'll
			  ^^^^^^ ^^
I think we've seen enough hate in your posts to know which side you're on.

>be happier.   I know it be nice to see you grow up.
Then keep one eye on that mirror!

>Marc Rassbach    marcr@studsys.mscs.mu.edu    If you take my advice, that
>MS-DOS - it's not   marc@milestn.mil.wi.us    is your problem, not mine!
>my problem!     If it was said on UseNet, it must be true.
>   Unix - It's a nice place to live, but you don't want to visit there.

Jennifer, "let's get a LITTLE more accurate with those Subject: lines, eh?"
JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJT
Forget Rush!  What's the Comedy Channel going to do?  All the dumb blonde
jokes resurfaced earlier this year and are worn out now.
---------------------------------------------------
I need a smiley for the sarcasmically impaired.
JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJT
Me, nor anyone else, has ever said the truth always felt like a Rush relaxer!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: kamilewi@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Alex Kamilewicz)
Subject: Re: Here Are The Undeniable Truths of Life
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:09:34 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.190611.1@woods.ulowell.edu> enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
>>In article <Bxtovu.7Ap@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, 
>>tz10956@meibm12.cen.uiuc.edu (Thomas Zych) writes:
>>> sjthomas@cup.portal.com (Stephen J Thomas) writes:
>> 
>>>                                                                   
>>>Rush Limbaugh's 35 Truths                                          
>>>                                                                   
>>>21. Abortion is wrong.                                             
>> 
>> But forcing women who cannot or do not wish to support children to have them,
>> in effect enslaving them, is perfectly alright.
>
>	Biology 101, Sex is first and foremost for the procreation of LIFE. 
>The old saying goes  here "If you don't want to get burned, don't play with
>fire."  It was a woman's choice to have sex or not(except cases of rape or
>incest) therefore she already executed her right to choose.  If a human being
>in the womb were just another body part abortion should be legal.(i.e. if you
>want your livver out take it out)  but human life is just that human life.)

What if she was already trying to avoid getting pregnant, i.e. like using
birth control, and it happened anyway?

>>>23. Evolution cannot explain creation.                             
>> 
>> And creation cannot explain evolution.
>
>
>	Here's one that'll shock ya.  According to my religion teacher in
>Catholic H.S., who also happened to be the Biology Teacher, the Catholic Church
>now teaches that the 7 days of creation were more like periods of time, the
>word DAYS was used figuratively to help make the understanding clearer. 
>Creation does surprisingly follow the chronological events proven by evolution.

Fine, but does it completely explain evolution?  I'll agree that the 
similarity is interesting and striking, but there are still some serious
facts lacking here.  That's why we have faith.

>>>30. The United States will again go to war.                        
>> 
>> Certainly.
>> 
>	And the Draft Dodging Bill Clinton will be on the front line so he can
>prove his manhood.

Just like Draft Dodging Dick Chaney and Dan Quayle did during the Persian\
Gulf war.

>>>33. There will always be poor people.                              
>> 
>> Unfortunately, true.
>
>	But there will be less if we give them a "Hand Up" not a "Hand
>Out"--Jack Kemp Rep National Convention  also plagurized by Clinton in his
>"acceptance speech"

Except that Clinton explained HOW to accomplish this.

Alex

-->Conservatism is for those who fail to understand reality<--
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: positron@leland.Stanford.EDU (Anjen Chen)
Subject: Re: rmgroup alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 21:29:11 GMT


oops.
From: paT bUcHAnaN
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Dan Quayle My Hero !!!!!!!!!!
Date: 23 Nov 92 00:34:41 GMT
Organization: Allegheny College

In article <1992Nov20.221348.4668@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>  
htuttle@nyx.cs.du.edu (Harry Tuttle) writes:
> In article <92324.212708KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt 
> udwick) writes:
> >In article <1992Nov16.164632.29867@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>,  
htuttle@nyx.cs.
> u.edu
> >(Harry Tuttle) says:
> >
> >>>Say... isn't that, "a beakon of truth," as it was in the official  
Quay
> e
> >>>family Christmas card of a couple of years ago...?
> >
> >>I'm glad that you think he is a schmuck as well.
> >
> >>We have another convert!
> >
> >Oh, for crying out loud.  I think Quayle is great, but I still have a  
se
> se
> >of humor about him.  Is this something you can't understand?
> >
> >Maybe it -is- true that liberals don't have a sense of humor.
> >
> >------------
> >Kurt Ludwick
> >------------
> 
> 
> 
> Kurt, Kurt, Kurt.
>  
> You know how medicine bottles have child-proof tops so little kids
> who don't know any better can't hurt themselves?
> 
> Well, I guess my posts are going to have to have Kurt-proof explanations
> so you don't sound silly anymore.  (Although I don't know if I alone
> can make you stop sounding silly...that's someone you'll have to work
> out on your own).
> 
> I guess this is how my post should have read:
> 
> Hey, Kurt!  This is Harry.  We don't agree on political views.  I know
> that you (Kurt) are a big fan of Dan Quayl whereas I (Harry) am not.
> 
> Here I go, I'm using sarcasm now.  Note the sarcasm that I am using!
> Watch as I sarcastically turn your words around and make people think
> that you (Kurt) actually don't like Quayl!  Ha ha ha, pretty funny,
> right?  
> 
> You see, it takes something away from the tone of the post if I have
> to telegraph everything, but hey, if that's what it takes...
> 
> BTW, didja notice how I didn't resort to silly generalizations about
> an entire group's sense of humor?  P
> 
> Pay close attention, Kurt, and maybe someday you'll be able to 
> post as well as I do.
> 
> 
> 
> Harry Tuttle.
> The Man, The Myth, The Conservative-Stomper
> 
> 

Harry, please don't inhale the smoke you're trying to blow up everyone's  
ass.  Your main pal Slick wouldn't want you to inhale.  As far as Quayle  
goes, I like him.  Tell me one thing that he's done wrong during the last  
four years.  And you can leave out the potato thing.  That doesn't affect  
the country at all.  But, I guess that's all you liberals have on Quayle,  
that he can't spell potato.  And , BTW, I didn't learn anything from your  
post except how to sound like an idiot.

*****If the opposite of Pro
     is Con.
     What's the opposite 
     of Progress?*****
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Limbaugh Watch - Day 17
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 17:37:38 GMT

November 19, 1992
Dateline - Santa Barbara, CA

It's now 17 days after Bill Clinton's election and Rush is still on the 
air with 536 radio affiliates and 207 TV affiliates, and his book is 
number one on the NY Times hardback non-fiction best-seller lists.
-- 
John Switzer               | "Lobbyists are circling Clinton like slugs
                           | around a saucer of beer."
CompuServe: 74076,1250     | -- Alexander Cockburn, LA Times 11/15/92
Internet: jrs@netcom.com   | (P.S. Impeach Clinton, support the coup!)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh