HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: carter@cae.wisc.edu (Carter Gregory)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: HELP ME on TOS 1.? 2.? 3.?
Date: 7 Apr 92 15:53:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: doug.1992Apr7.105355.5561
Organization: College of Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison

In article <1992Apr6.135430.11669@DMI.USherb.CA> lefrm00@terre.DMI.USherb.CA (MARTIN K. LEFRANCOIS) writes:
>
>   I need your help,
>   	I'm a student at the Universite de Sherbrooke in Quebec, Canada.  I
>   have to make a presentation in front of the class on operating
>   system concepts, my choice was the TOS.
>   I have more than 30 magazines on ST and 3 books from Micro Application,
>   but I can't find what I looking for.
> 
>  I want to know:
>  
>  -What TOS is for?  Tramiel Operating System???
>
>  -What does TOS do?
>
>  -What is the diference between TOS 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6 and 1.65??
>
>	I know that TOS 1.0 and 1.1 was on disk, TOS 1.2 was a chip, and
>   from TOS 1.4 when you format a disk it use MS-DOS type. 
>   
>  -What version is the Rainbow TOS? what does it do than the others dont?
>
>  -What is the new features on TOS 2.? an TOS 3.?
>
>
>   I know I ask you a lot, but I REALY NEED THESE INFORMATIONS. 
>
>{^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~}
>{ lefrm00@dmi.usherb.ca     |     ___ ____                               }
>{ Martin-Karl LeFrancois    |    /__   /                                 }
>{ Universite de Sherbrooke  |   ___/  /                                  }
>{ Sherbrooke, Quebec(Canada)|                                   	 }
>{ (819) 822-2512            |                                            }
>{~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v~v}
Gosh, guy, I wish I could have people do my homework for me!

-Greg
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
From: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov (John Hutchinson)
Subject: Re: mega ste price
Reply-To: hutch@bellman.lanl.gov
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 15:50:55 GMT

Roger, if your intent is to flame the Atari, there are better places to do it than in this newsgroup.  People here are well aware of the Atari's weaknesses (and it's many strengths, for that matter).  If you love the PC so much, then I recommend you attend the PC newsgroups and save the diskspace for the rest of us.

Personally, I think we _do_ have good word processors, data bases, hard disk tools, etc, etc, that you complained about.  Perhaps not the wide assortment that the PC enjoys, but they are there nonetheless.  Sorry that you do not have strong local support for the Atari in Kapiti, New Zealand, but don't feel like the lone stranger.

Sure, we would all like to see massive software support for the Atari such as that enjoyed by the PC community from outfits like Microsoft, Borland, et. al.  We would all like to have a qualified Atari dealer in every town.  And we would all like to see Atari expend more effort in advertising.  But few of us, I venture, would be willing to exchange our current GEM based Ataris for just another clone-in-a-box.  We like what we have.  It may be less than the ideal, but better than the alternative.

Atari bashing is negativism in its most unproductive form... it doesn't do you, or the rest of us, any good.  If you are so unhappy with your Atari, then dump it, buy a PC and leave the rest of us alone.  That way, you get the machine you want and we don't have to listen to your pi**ing and moaning any more.

How do the REST of you feel about this???
From: wabe@ukc.ac.uk (W.A.B.Evans)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Release of RDE Version_2
Summary: New "ALL-TOS" Version of RDE/RDY Ramdisk
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:01:48 GMT
Reply-To: wabe@ukc.ac.uk (W.A.B.Evans)
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.

*************************************************************************
*    (ALL-TOS-compatible Version of Mark Williams Co.'s RDY Ramdisk	*
*    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	*
*									*
*		 distributed to the Public Domain			*
*		 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~			*
*	by kind permission of Mark Williams Co.( Doug Peterson )	*
*	~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	*
*************************************************************************

	I have recently obtained permission from Mark Williams Co. to
release my "All-TOS" Version_2 of RDE.PRG to the Public Domain. 

      Previously, RDE (Version_1) worked only with TOS Versions >= 1.4 and
complemented Mark Williams Co.'s RDY which worked with earlier TOSes. The
current offering works for both cases. Version 2 also has lots of minor
code improvements and an enhanced GUI enabling all drive letters to be
mouse selected. Hence, those who work regularly on both an "old TOS" ST
as well as a "new TOS" machine will find this particularly useful.

      To complement this I have also sent RDSH (a mini-shell tailored
specifically to facilitate the extra features that are accessible only
through the command-line invocation of RDE) to the Twitterpater Archives.
This, also, has some novel commands for i/ changing the DRIVE Volume Label
of a saved RDE/RDY file and ii/ for UPGRADING an "old" saved RDE/RDY file
to the new "All-TOS" format. There are also some minor RDE-specific
utilities (DESKTOP.PRG and a tailored boot source code "IQ_BOOT.C")
included with the RDSH submission.

      I expect these two submissions will be released very soon.

						W. Alan B. Evans,
						[wabe@ukc.ac.uk]
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Atari Buying Up Good Software?
From: Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 00:25:20 GMT
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange

In article <5440178@hplsla.hp.com> andyc@hplsla.hp.com (Andy Cassino) writes:
> 
> The past week I've read (on GEnie) that Atari has purchased SuperBase 
> for the ST from Oxxi, Inc (which bought it from Precision Software, the 
> creators of the program). Also, I read that Atari bought LDW Power (from 
> LDW). In both cases, the story seems to be, upgrades are no longer available 
> from these companies for these programs, and no one seems to know what 
> the deal is.
>     % Andy Cassino                                       %
>     % Hewlett-Packard - Lake Stevens Instrument Division %


I did read some were last week that Oxxi was going to release version 4/1.3
for the Atari as soon as they had finished version 4/1.3 for the Amiga..

Also can I update LDW from version 1.1 to version 2.0..??
-- 
***  Roger W. Sheppard      *      Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz  ***
***  85 Donovan Rd        *    *   GEnie.  R.SHEPPARD5               ***
***  Kapiti                        At least I don't Flicker,         ***
***  New Zealand..          *      not like a dying light globe      ***
From: ABADDON@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: : Kiwi attack on Atari/Falcon
Date: 13 Apr 92 09:29:16 GMT
 k> <4752@krafla.rhi.hi.is><1992Apr9.092527.786@actrix.gen.nz>
Organization: University of Liverpool

In article <1992Apr9.092527.786@actrix.gen.nz>, Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
says:
>Name what is week about the A5000...?? it eats the Falcon and the TT
>for breakfast...!! ITS a 32 Bit RISC Machine...and Run Unix, were is
>Unix for the Ataries..!!
Well, the evaluation model we had (not an a5000, one of its big brothers) had
some problems with its Unix. One that comes to mind was that it was possible
to lock up the machine with the mouse whilst running X windows - you needed to
powercyclye to get it going again - ouch. As for Atari Unix, its out, and has a
apparently been with developors for a while now.


Kev
------
Kevin O'Donovan          | D'you wear a black armband when they shot the man
kebab@uk.co.compulink.cix| who said 'Peace could last forever', and in my
mebeb@uk.ac.liv.uxa      | first memories they shot Kennedy, I went numb
abaddon@uk.ac.liv.ibm    | when I learned to see...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: aq115@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robert C Glover)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: TOS 1.62 for sale
Date: 7 Apr 92 01:33:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: usenet.1992Apr7.013316.25110
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)


John Ladasky:
 
The only machines that can run TOS 1.62 are either the 520STE/1040STE or
Mega STE.  Yes, the Mega STE will run it, we've tried it and it works.
It's one of the few ways to make some games run on a Mega STE.  TOS 2.0x
isn't very friendly toward a lot of games, and TOS 1.62 is a help, but
it's still not as friendly as good ole' TOS 1.4.
 
Rob
-- 
| Robert Glover                               GEnie:  R.GLOVER3 |
| Internet:           rg@turing.acs.virginia.edu                |
| Cleveland Freenet:  aq115@cleveland.freenet.edu               |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: micro@imada.ou.dk (Klaus Pedersen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: TT030/8 Information Needed!
Date: 13 Apr 92 18:48:50 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Math. & Computer Science, Odense University, Denmark

shore@equinox.gen.nz (Craig Shore) writes:

>Speaking about Jukebox... for some reason I can't get it to work
> on my STE (2 megs RAM)... It loads the MOD okay, plays for 10 - 20
> seconds, then crashes with a horrible low pitch buzzing (like it's
> playing junk out of the computers RAM)

> Any ideas why??


How come that the author of a program never get's to know things like this??
The Jukebox is free, and all the author ask is to get ideas and bug-reports.
(I am the author, so I know for sure that that there have been around zero
 bug-reports.)

Please mail me the details: do you run the program as PRG or ACC, what program
are active when the crash happens, what TSR's are active... (One MOD? - What 
MOD?) What version of the Jukebox did you use? Did you get warnings when you
extracted the program??


-Klaus
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
From: bossoj@aix.rpi.edu (Joseph Charles Bossolini)
Subject: Re: Word Processors
Keywords: word processor dtp 
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 13:28:01 GMT

The reasoning behind having the ability to print Postscript-to-disk (in a 
DTP program, or word processor, or whatever) is so one can take the output
somewhere else and get a high quality printout.  I personally do this with
Pagestream, and on my roommates MS-DOS machine w/ Windows, any program that
prints using Windows can also be made to do this (i.e.  word pros, 
spreadsheets, etc.).  I then take the disk to the campus SPARC stations
and print out the file on a Laserwriter, and I get high quality printouts
for free!

Joe
bosso@rpi.edu
From: chang@ADELPHI-ASSB01.ARMY.MIL (Forrest Chang)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: help... recovering "formatted" drive, anything like Norton Utilities?
Date: 10 Apr 92 21:32:52 GMT


	While trying to clean up my sh204..

	I hooked up my atari SH204 (20 meg) to the DMA out on my toadfile 85
(icd host adapter, seagate drive), I changed the 204' scsi id to 1, (the 
toadfile like most hd packages default to 0 ), everything was fine.

	The toadfile 85 has 6 partitions of ~ 14 meg, I moved everything to the
upper 3 partitions and copied the three partitions of the 204 to the lower
3 partitions.  All good and fine..

	Then, I used the hdx that came with the 204, dated March 27 1986
(BAD MOVE) and proceeded to format HD 1 (changing the value from the default
0).  Well, then the wrong light is blinking.  My toadfile blinks for ~ 10
seconds and then the first 3 partions have been zeroed.  I say this coz
tho' hdx was supposed to be formatting, it blinked too short to have taken
out 40 some meg, coz it left the bottom 3 partitions untouched.  Well,
the c,d,e partions now have 0bytes 0 items, also the partition size has
changed from all 14 megs to something like 40 some, 5 , and 10 meg.

	I'm sure the data is there, and I'm fairly familiar with how
floppies are set up with the FAT and all, but I'm in the dark with regards
to how HD's are setup.  Where do you look to see what partitions there are?
I suppose that would tell me where the FATS are too.  Is it possible that
the place that describes the partitions was cleaned up and the actual FATs
are still there?  The whole thing wasn't wiped out coz all the data on the
bottome 3 partitions are good.

	This was on a 1040STe w/ tos 1.6.

	Help.  please...

	Thank you

	Fo
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Terminal server idler?
From: Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 07:32:32 GMT
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange

In article <JARTSU.92Apr6032009@saha.hut.fi> Jari.Lehto@hut.fi writes:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I am looking for a program, preferably an accessory, that keeps my
> terminal line up when idling. 
> The terminal servers I am using break the connection if there has been
> no input from the user in 30 minutes. So I would like to find
> something that allows me to set the ASCII value and the time-interval
> of the char and then it sends this char to the RS-port according the
> time-interval. And if it could even be auto-starting, like begin this
> idling when a certain time has passed since the last RS-traffic or a
> certain string comes from the RS-port.
> 
> Some challenge for programmers? Of course this all should be able to
> run background...
> 
> --
> * Jari Lehto     * Voice 90-387939    *   Email Jari.Lehto@hut.fi   *
> * Tenavatie 19 A * Fax +358 0 8735916 * fwd -> s37837k@saha.hut.fi  *
> * 00760 HELSINKI * "There is always room for music (Gospel & synth) *
> * Finland        * and for love & friendship. And of course Atari." *

Well the one that I use is called BUSYBUD, but I think that I dnloaded
from GEnie, its a 4.3 k ACC...
 
-- 
***  Roger W. Sheppard      *      Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz  ***
***  85 Donovan Rd        *    *   GEnie.  R.SHEPPARD5               ***
***  Kapiti                        At least I don't Flicker,         ***
***  New Zealand..          *      not like a dying light globe      ***
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
From: tbrown@woozie.cis.ohio-state.edu (Ted Brown)
Subject: Re: ACE'92 show: Report
Organization: The Ohio State University, Department of Computer and Information Science
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 19:49:55 GMT


>In any case, to answer your question, the Gemulator board that contains
>the TOS Roms actually has two empty sockets for the Mac ROMs.

Well that relieves *some* of my questions.  How does it read Mac Disks? It
would be enough if it could read 1.44 disks (that is as soon as Dave adds
the capability), but I don't see how you can make a typical IBM read 
Macintosh disks without some extra hardware device (of course I am not a 
hardware-techy type so I could be wrong).

It just seems to me that for a $300 program on top of a $2500 machine which
you need to buy some TOS chips to add, just to emulate a $350 computer is 
just a little out of whack.  Some might want it to run Spectre but that still
gets out of line: $300 + $500 (Spectre w/Roms) + TOS comes to $800 plus to
emulate a mac (but probably faster than a plus speeds).  I guess some might
pay any price to be able to run mac apps on an IBM, but we are close range of
just go out an buy a real mac so you get Sys7, all the proper ports and such,
the possiblility of color, et all.  Well, I guess someone will buy it just
to be able to do that.

But hey, I guess it's a good add for an ST.  It takes a 50Mhz 486 just to be
an ST (without MIDI).  Hey, how is Gemulator on ST sound anyway?

Ted Brown (still trying to get "it")
Organization: Ryerson Polytechnical Institute
Distribution: na
Date: Wednesday, 8 Apr 1992 15:42:46 EST
From: Carlos Varela <EENG6801@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: GER2EN19.LZH uploaded to wuarchive

I've uploaded GER2EN19.LZH to 128.252.135.4 on /pub/atari.
This is the newest version and it uses an GEM interface.
More then 15000 words are available, on CRACKART.TXT it does
around 70% of the text. Although some parts of the translation
are confusing, I was able to use CrackArt and try some functions
based on it. Speed: ST 2000 words/min, TT 5000 words/min.
====================================================================
| " Competence, like truth, beauty and   =   Carlos J. C. Varela   |
| a contact lens, is in the eye of the   =   EENG6801.RYERSON.CA   |
| beholder."                             =   Fnet Node: #18, #38   |
====================================================================
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Atari dead in NZ - NEVER!  
From: Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 23:10:36 GMT
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange

In article <12698.989225751@kcbbs.gen.nz> Dawn_Scotting@kcbbs.gen.nz (Dawn Scotting) writes:
> X-Mailer: KCReader v0.95a  
> help  
> send 8bit/Index  
>   
>   pandora@kcbbs.gen.nz OR Fidonet 3:772/90         
>   Kia Ora from The Land of the Long White Cloud    
>                                                    
> --- KCReader v0.95 beta  
>   
> >  
> >Hey Roger, Atari may very well be dead in New Zealand, but it is rather  
> >stupid to extrapolate this to the entire world, and especially Europe,  
> >where Atari is doing well. Expand your horizons a little.  
> >  

You have you facts wrong..!!!

From the feed back back that I received Atari is no doing to well any were,
the TT and Mega STE is a flop, and a lot of software houses are dropping
Atari..

Don't just read the Bull that you get out of Stupid UK Magazines..

Just live with the Facts and don't be a just Bigot...
-- 
***  Roger W. Sheppard      *      Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz  ***
***  85 Donovan Rd        *    *   GEnie.  R.SHEPPARD5               ***
***  Kapiti                        At least I don't Flicker,         ***
***  New Zealand..          *      not like a dying light globe      ***
From: bpat@cs.mcgill.ca (Patrick BETREMIEUX)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: software blitting
Date: 9 Apr 92 17:45:06 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.1992Apr9.174506.11150
Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Aren't the Line-A routines supposed to use the blitter if it's present ???
I heard they should be able to do 1000 16x16 blits per second (Or at
least this is what Atari claimed in its adds :-). So with the blitter
on, it should go about 1200 + blits per seconds, no ?

As far as I'm concerned, the Line-A routines are *pretty* fast (Not as
fast as what we could do on our own with self-modifying code and all,
but good enough for any games. I wrote Tetris with them, and it's fast)

I think Atari should have stuck with them even in the TT. It can't be
that hard to change them to work with 8 bits/pixel, can it?

					Patrick BETREMIEUX.
From: Bob_BobR_Retelle@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: ACE'92 show: Report
Date: 8 Apr 92 05:40:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: cup.57068
  <12402@umd5.umd.edu> <1992Apr7.194955.26378@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: The Portal System (TM)

Ted Brown questions the usefulness of emulating a Mac on a PC...
 
There already IS a Mac emulator board for the PC.  It costs on the order
of $1000 and requires you to insert genuine Mac ROMS, just like the
Spectre.  It "wastes" a slot, just like the GEMulator would (what does
"waste" a slot mean..?  A floppy controller card "wastes" a slot, as does
any card you WANT to use...)
 
You have to add the cost of Mac ROMs to the $1K pricetag, and yes,
apparently people want to run Mac apps on PCs enough to pay the price.
 
There is also an Apple II emulator board for the PC.  I don't know how
much it costs, as it came with my wife's PS/2 from the school she
teaches at.  It loads Apple's DOS from disk, and allows you to attach
a genuine Apple disk drive to load Apple software.  Ironically, it also
uses a very "ST Xformerish" method of storing Apple software on the PCs
native drives.
 
Who needs it..?  Not I, but apparently enough educators want one to
make it a viable product.
 
Who needs a GEMulator..?  Again, not I.. but that doesn't mean no one
else will buy one.  And really, who cares..?  It can be done, and be
done legally, so I really don't see where the problem is...
 
BobR
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
From: bgilbert@cs.washington.edu (Benjamin Gilbert)
Subject: Re: Word Processors
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 04:29:50 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.230239.23854@actrix.gen.nz> Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes:
>
>Does this have the same problem that all GDOS type program have, you
>nead 2 lots a fonts, one for the screen and one for the printer,
>plus you can't load fonts on the fly, only at run time...!!!
>-- 
>***  Roger W. Sheppard      *      Roger.Sheppard@bbs.actrix.gen.nz  ***
>***  85 Donovan Rd        *    *   GEnie.  R.SHEPPARD5               ***
>***  Kapiti                        At least I don't Flicker,         ***
>***  New Zealand..          *      not like a dying light globe      ***

No, Wordflair II has FSM/GDOS which means Font Scaling Module Graphic Device
Operating System.   This means that all the fonts are represented as 
vector objects instead of original bitmaps as in original GDOS and many
IBM fonts (for MS-Word, for example).   Here, any font can be scaled to
any size and there is no need to have separate screen and printer fonts
because there are drivers to scale and output the fonts to a variety of
devices.   
	In addition, like you mentioned it is possible to load fonts on
the fly, just depending on your memory.  FSM comes with an accessory which
lets you create new fonts, add existing fonts to the 'active' list, etc etc
without having to modify the assign.sys file as in GDOS and/or reboot or
anything.  It's all done very easily from within your GEM program as a
desk accessory.

	BTW anyone who is interested, there is a review of FSM/GDOS in the
March/April 1991 Atari Explorer, and Wordflair II in the September 1991
issue.

Happy word processing!

**********************************************************************
Ben Gilbert
bgilbert@cs.washington.edu
**********************************************************************

Xref: sparky comp.sys.atari.st:7068 comp.sys.atari.st.tech:2658
Organisation: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet, Muenster, Germany
Date: Wednesday, 8 Apr 1992 15:34:39 MES
From: Bjarne Pohlers <ZX0013@DMSWWU1A.BITNET>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.atari.st.tech
Subject: Re: Making the screen one line shorter (at the bottom) -- How?
 <09BViB1w164w@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>

In article <09BViB1w164w@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca>, mforget@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca
(Michel Forget) says:
>No, a window is not the way to go for me.  The mailer and newsgroup
>machine was not working regularly, so I think I missed a lot of this
>thread.  I did find out one way to shorten the screen.  Subtract 1 from
>the value contained at $2AB2 and you have a shorter screen.  Add 1 when
>you want to update the status bar.  It was as simple as that.  At least
>for monochrome.
Who guarantees that this will work with alternative screen-drivers, with
other resolutions than the standart (e.g. autoswitch-overscan, new graphic-
cards, etc....)? Will it run under MGR or with MW? On a TT? Is $2AB2
a documented system-variable? Your program will only run on some special
machines with a special TOS. Don't do that!!!!!!!
>  l have to try it with color as well, since I am not
>sure if the address applies to all ST machines.
Please try also on all graphic-cards, on all STs on a TT, the new falcon, under
all TOS-versions, under MiNT, MTOS and please test also all screen accelerators
...:-(
Thanks.
--
!"$%&/);=?!-.'"!=({\,@*~#+$'&(/!&=`"%$_.|?>}`>|"/~<$:&)*;#!;&=#"&%$\':"
"  Bjarne Pohlers    Fast address: <srb110@math.uni-muenster.de>              &
\                    Slow address: Asbeckweg 15 | W-4400 Muenster | Germany   \
&                    Phone number: (xx49)251-866559                           "
":'\$%&"#=&;!#;*)&:$<~/"|>`}>?|._$%"`=&!/(&'$+#~*@,\{(=!"'.-!?=;)/&%$"!