HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: umcarls9@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Charles Carlson)
Subject: Re: Installing 1.2.1b
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 18:20:52 GMT

In <AfNP8qK00UhWQ6vFh2@andrew.cmu.edu> mp52+@andrew.cmu.edu (Matthew Edward Patton) writes:

>Anyway, upon reading the read.me I realized there are several manuals
>that I am lacking. ie installation guide, users guide and another one. 
>Where on the CD rom do they reside?  They deffinately weren't on the
>installatio diskettes and not installed in the /tcpip/doc directory
>either.  Can someone give me a few pointers, or maybe uuencode and mail
>them to me?  Thanks very much.

The documentation is in the \books directory on the CDROM, file names:
eala2101.boo   ealh2101.boo   eals3101.boo
eala5001.boo   ealp4101.boo   lsp13mst.boo

You will need the IBM book reader to view them, there are DOS and OS/2 
versions in the \ez2inst directory on the ROM.  The OS/2 version requires
a couple lines in the config.sys file, see the install script in the root
directory of the ROM to see what needs to be done, I can't remember 
at the moment.


-- 
/ Charles Carlson  umcarls9@ccu.Umanitoba.CA  
\ This .sig now available on a limited edition 2 record set, for 4 easy 
/ installments of $19.95 each. To order, please have your Visa or Mastercard
\ ready and phone: 1-800-555-1212, or send check or MO to 200-155 Carlton St.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: krking@fuji.mitre.org (Kenneth R. King)
Subject: Remote printing problem
Organization: Research Computer Facility, MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 17:44:21 GMT

I installed TCP/IP vers. 1.2.1 on my IBM Model 90 running
OS/2 2.0 with no problems (thanks to Dean Pentcheff's notes).
I added "RUN=C:\TCPIP\BIN\LPRMON.EXE -b lpt1" to my config.sys file
to enable remote printing through a unix host.  I setup the OS/2
Print Manager to print through lpt1: using an Apple NTX print
driver.  The Printer-specific format is selected in the PMPRINT
queue driver settings.

Everything works fine when printing from DOS applications (Quatro Pro 3.0) 
with a postscript print driver thru lpt1:.  However, when printing 
from Word-for-Windows, I get a text image of the postscript file.

I checked the 2.0 FAQ file as well as old postings for hints.  I
tried disabling the WinOs/2 print manager by removing !printman
from the MAVDMapps line in the windows sys.ini file.

Any help would be appreciated.

Ken King
krking@linus.mitre.org






Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Remote boot of OS/2?
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 21:09:11 GMT

In article <1993Jan27.072550.12735@umr.edu> jdickins@cs.umr.edu (James Dickinson) writes:
>Will Lan Server 3.0 let a diskless workstation boot of the the server?
>The *.boo docs that came with the Nov. PDK kindof skirted this issue.
>Any help will be appreciated

Yes.  The manual "Remote Installation and Maintenance" (about $7)
which I list in the OS/2 FAQ List talks quite a bit about RIPL
(booting off the server).

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | READ the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0i, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Post to ONE newsgroup only AFTER reading the List.]
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: Where do you get IBM TCP/IP?
Date: 27 Jan 93 01:31:38 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <sfNQ9EG00UhWQ6vHA1@andrew.cmu.edu> Matthew Edward Patton <mp52+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>Anyone have the product #'s for the tcp/ip and Xwindows?  I need these
>to talk to IBM.  Seems #'s are all they understand.

The TCP/IP announcement letter has all the part numbers you need.  It
should be located in /pub/os2/all/info on ftp-os2.nmsu.edu (via
anonymous ftp), but check file /pub/os2/00Index if you can't find it.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | READ the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0i, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Post to ONE newsgroup only AFTER reading the List.]
From: d9mikael@dtek.chalmers.se (Mikael Wahlgren)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Local security?  Oh no!!! Help!
Date: 22 Jan 93 14:10:39 GMT
Organization: Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg Sweden

Tonight I made a mistake when altering the CONFIG.SYS file on my file server
which cause the server to TRAP when booting.  Now I am in a desperate need
of restoring my old CONFIG.SYS (which I have on the partition) to get my
IBM Lan Server 3.0 up again.

The problem is, if I boot up my usual OS/2 2.0 diskettes I can't reach
the partition because it is protected with local security (access denied).
I try to boot a Lan Manager HPFS crash recovery diskette, but when I
enter the LS partition the MS Lan Man says it can't access the partition
because it was created with another version.

Anyone that have any idea of how to get access to my partition again.

Mikael Wahlgren
From: traub@rtf.bt.co.uk (Michael Traub)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: X11R4 / PMX / PM Window Manager
Date: 26 Jan 93 11:35:20 GMT
Organization: BT Customer Systems, Brighton, UK

In article <1jp18hINNt9d@neuro.usc.edu> merlin@neuro.usc.edu (merlin) writes:
>QUERY:  Does anyone have a solution for what appears to be an inability
>to move focus into existing an xterm after a subprocess launched from that
>xterm is killed on the remote machine?

I have a slightly different problem. When XDM starts up and gives me
a login screen it takes the mouse/keyboard focus and refuses to give
it up! I cannot access anything else on the desktop until I log in
to the Unix host. Once logged in focus works as expected. As soon
as I log out again and XDM's window re-appears I again cannot change
the focus. The XDM is from SCO's Opendesktop 1.1 (X11R3).



-- 
Michael Traub
BT Customer Systems, Brighton Systems Centre. traub@btcs.bt.co.uk

    JOE, taxi driver: Unemployment will rise and sooner or later the
    masses will revolt against it. There'll be civil disorder and the
    further breakdown of civil society. The end result I hope will be
    the triumph of the people over capitalism. I also wouldn't mind
    if a few more people used taxis this year - '92 was rotten.

(Taken from "Hopes and Fears" in The Guardian, December 31st 1992, a
section which looked at what people saw 1993 bringing)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (kellmeyer steven l)
Subject: Re: Name pipes over TCP/IP
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 02:15:08 GMT

shiva@well.sf.ca.us (Kenneth Porter) writes:

>Running FTP's PC/TCP for OS/2, is there a way to create a networked
>named pipe? If I run the netbios emulation, does that help me at all?

Shoot me for a newbie idiot, but what the hell is a named pipe, anyway?
I read the Novell manual, and it describes how to set them up, but never
tells you what bloody good they do.  Why use them?  What are they?  What
do they taste like?  Are they better with ketchup?  I don't get it.

Steve Kellmeyer
-- 

Steve Kellmeyer 
kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
From: lopes@cogsci.ucsd.EDU (alann lopes)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: IBM NFS performance (too bad!)
Date: 24 Jan 93 20:36:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: cogsci.1854
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <1993Jan21.180618.120415@ipgaix.unipg.it> luca@dedalo.unipg.it (Luca Priorelli) writes:
-Every once in a while I get upset of the poor performance of 
-IBM NFS and hope that new CSDs would solve the problem.
-Instead... no way.
-
-I have just applied the latest CSD found in hobbes and:
-
-- I can now mount an exported OS/2 directory from a SPARCstation 
-  (before I couldn't) but when I try to copy a file from the
-  Sun to the OS/2 (running on a PS/2 95), well... it takes about 11 minutes
-  to copy a 2Mbytes file!!!
-  
-- Emacs does not work yet.
-
-And here are some timings copying a 2Mbytes file:
-
-machine        type
-A             ps/2 40 386sx 20Mhz
-B             ps/2 80 386dx 20Mhz
-C             ps/2 95 486dx 33Mhz
-D             SPARCstation  33Mhz
-
-A --> C  (write)    39"
-A <-- C  (read)     49"  (this is the first time a see a NFS read taking
-                          more than a write)
-
-A --> D             35"
-A <-- D           1'05" (??? more than above!)
-
-B --> D             35"
-B <-- D             20"  (well, sounds better!)
-
-C --> D             26"
-C <-- D              6"  (not bad)
-
-D --> C           11'10"  (??? this must be a BIG BUG)
-D <-- C               2"  (I cannot believe this!)
-
-Well, can you find any sense from these figures?
-
-Why D reads in 6" and A in 1'05"? OK it is a faster machine but this cannot
-explain the difference. Moreover, it takes more to read than to write!
-B which is almost the same speed does much better.
-
-The ethernet adapter? 3C509 for A and 3C525 for B and C. 3C509 is 
-advertized as a very fast one (or it isn't?). The counterproof is
-easy. I have installed LAN server 3.0 on C and LAN requester on A.
-Well, I cannot tell the difference between a local disk and the remote
-disk from C.
-
-Why IBM NFS is so bad?
-
-Luca Priorelli
-

 I wish I knew! I've been told by their tech support that they're
 rewriting a lot of the NFS code, but this was about 2 months ago.

 I'm happy with the base tcp/ip package, although there are quarks
 in the terminal support (ansi, vt100, etc...), but NFS is horrible.
 I've been complaining about this since Sept 92 and they appeared to
 be aware of the problem back then. We're approaching 5 months and I'm
 still getting the same bogus performance ( 20-40K /sec average 
 read/write ). This is with a 7168 buffer, it's much worse at 4096.
 What kind of read/write transfer rates are people getting????

        Thanks -- alann

   alann lopes:        alopes@ucsd.edu       -- internet
   (619) 534-5438      ALOPES@UCSD           -- bitnet
From: brianw@macbeth.umd.edu (Brian Wiersema)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: TCP/IP CSD Problem
Summary: PMX UN30680 causes Trap D
Keywords: TCPIP, CSD
Date: 21 Jan 93 17:33:36 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <1jmip3INNi2h@swrinde.nde.swri.edu> tennis@swrinde.nde.swri.edu (Richard F. Tennis) writes:
>   I just installed the latest csds for TCP/IP 1.2.1 to my 2.0 GA + SP
>system.  Now I am having problems with NFS and PMX.  PMX crashes my
>machine with a TRAP D message somewhere in my etherlink16 ndis driver as
>soon as I try to open an xterm window.  NFS starts hanging with
>periodic RETRY errors after a variable length of use.  Everything was
>basically working before I installed these last csds except that PMX
>would die after a few hours so I would really like to make the new stuff
>work since it is suppose to fix this problem.  My configuration is:
>
>	2.0 ga + SP on a 16 MB, 66 MHz 486
>	Etherlink 16 on thicknet
>	1.2.1 TCPIP base + UN29511 csd
>	NFS + UN32132 csd
>	PMX + UN30680 csd
>
>   Anyone know if there are any newer csds or have any other solutions to
>suggest?

I can confirm the problem, at least with regard to PMX:  Trap 000d,
Internal processing error# 0160:fff6459e 000d:959e.  Haven't tried NFS
yet.  Same CSD level, but I have 3c503tp card and my crashes always
occur when closing a DXterm window (I can open and close other xterms
just fine).

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: daniel@lamont.ldgo.columbia.edu (Dan Quoidbach)
Subject: OS/2 and an AppleTalk Network
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.networking
Organization: Ocean Drilling Program/LDGO
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:33:12 GMT

We have a mix of Mac's, 286/dos5, and 486/dos5/win3.1 machines on an
appletalk network. The 286s and one 486 use Farallon's PhoneNet Card, while
one 486 uses a Dayna DL2000 card to connect to the network. All PCs are
running Farallon's PhoneNet Talk 2.04, but the upgrades to 3.0 have been
ordered for the windows machines. I hear nice things about OS/2, and am
getting tired of the problems we keep having with windows, but have been
told that, if we run OS/2 on our 486s, we can't use our existing PhoneNet
cards or software. Is this true, or can we just set up our 486s with OS/2
and live happily ever after? We can't change our network, we'de rather not
buy new cards and software for the 486s, so are we stuck using windows?
Thanks for the help.


Dan Quoidbach                               daniel@lamont.ldgo.columbia.edu
Ocean Drilling Program
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Palisades, NY 10964
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: luca@dedalo.unipg.it (Luca Priorelli)
Subject: IBM NFS performance (too bad!)
Organization: Universita' di Perugia
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:06:18 GMT

Every once in a while I get upset of the poor performance of 
IBM NFS and hope that new CSDs would solve the problem.
Instead... no way.

I have just applied the latest CSD found in hobbes and:

- I can now mount an exported OS/2 directory from a SPARCstation 
  (before I couldn't) but when I try to copy a file from the
  Sun to the OS/2 (running on a PS/2 95), well... it takes about 11 minutes
  to copy a 2Mbytes file!!!
  
- Emacs does not work yet.

And here are some timings copying a 2Mbytes file:

machine        type
A             ps/2 40 386sx 20Mhz
B             ps/2 80 386dx 20Mhz
C             ps/2 95 486dx 33Mhz
D             SPARCstation  33Mhz

A --> C  (write)    39"
A <-- C  (read)     49"  (this is the first time a see a NFS read taking
                          more than a write)

A --> D             35"
A <-- D           1'05" (??? more than above!)

B --> D             35"
B <-- D             20"  (well, sounds better!)

C --> D             26"
C <-- D              6"  (not bad)

D --> C           11'10"  (??? this must be a BIG BUG)
D <-- C               2"  (I cannot believe this!)

Well, can you find any sense from these figures?

Why D reads in 6" and A in 1'05"? OK it is a faster machine but this cannot
explain the difference. Moreover, it takes more to read than to write!
B which is almost the same speed does much better.

The ethernet adapter? 3C509 for A and 3C525 for B and C. 3C509 is 
advertized as a very fast one (or it isn't?). The counterproof is
easy. I have installed LAN server 3.0 on C and LAN requester on A.
Well, I cannot tell the difference between a local disk and the remote
disk from C.

Why IBM NFS is so bad?

Luca Priorelli


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Norton Commander / Serial Comm transfer program?
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 00:39:34 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.002513.3299@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>>I require an easy to use serial transfer application so that I can back
>>up my 200 Meg drive to my friend's 800 Meg drive (we're both running
>>OS/2 2.0) before I reformat and install OS/2 2.1.  (Our drives are 
>>incompatible in the same system, otherwise it would be a piece of cake.)
>>FAT and HPFS support have to be mandatory in the product I'm looking for.
>>(It should also run under 2.1 after to get my data back afterwards.)
>>See, overall, I have too much data to backup to floppy but not enough
>>to warrant some major jerry-rigging to put both drives in the same
>>system.
>Now that's an interesting one -- somethink like LapLink for OS/2, I
>suppose.  I don't know of such a product (yet).  You could use a
>conventional communications program (like TE/2, C-Kermit, etc), but I
>realize that isn't exactly what you are looking for.
>If I have a free bit of time maybe I'll write one.  Something like
>that could be done in Visual REXX, even.

On second thought, I believe OS2You will perform this task quite well.
(You may need M2Zmodem as well.)  Both are available via anonymous ftp
from ftp-os2.nmsu.edu.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0i, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
From: mhuth@hardy.u.washington.edu (Mark Huth)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Re: Connection using NFS and mount.
Date: 23 Jan 93 20:16:46 GMT
Organization: University of Washington
NNTP-Posting-Host: hardy.u.washington.edu

umcarls9@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Charles Carlson) writes:

Isn't that a sorry state of affairs!


>In <1jnjb1INN8t9@shelley.u.washington.edu> mhuth@hardy.u.washington.edu (Mark Huth) writes:

>>Is it possible to use NFS and connect to a network drive using 
>>program manager?  Whenever I try to do it it tells me "that function 
>>isn't supported for the network drive".  Surely we can use PM to look at
>>the network directory, can't we?

>No, you can't.  At this time, the PM/WPS doesn't support drag & drop or
>other such neat network functions on NFS drives.

>An IBMer told me that it was going to be supported eventually, but had no
>idea when.


>-- 
>/ Charles Carlson  umcarls9@ccu.Umanitoba.CA  
>\ This .sig now available on a limited edition 2 record set, for 4 easy 
>/ installments of $19.95 each. To order, please have your Visa or Mastercard
>\ ready and phone: 1-800-555-1212, or send check or MO to 200-155 Carlton St.
From: zhao@unixg.ubc.ca (Jiansheng Zhao)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: How to network to PCs
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:47:22 GMT
Organization: The University of British Columbia
NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca


From wood@ida.org Tue Jan 26 07:56:48 1993
To: unruh@physics.ubc.ca
Cc: wood@ida.org, zhao@unixg.ubc.ca
Status: OR

Re: How to network two PC?

(Perhaps you can post this for me; I can't post at the moment...)

Check the following two sources:BG Micro (214)271-5546 is a 
distributor of the $25 and $75 networks (the $75 network is called
Little Big LAN--I have this and it works fine under DOS.  How it
works under OS/2 I have no idea yet).  The software developer is IMODES
and is available 9-5 Central at (817)387-3339.

This network is completely transparent to DOS.  You can connect up to
256 computers via 6 conductor telephone cable and serial port connectors,
up to 80 ft at 110 Kbaud, or with parallel port connectors up to 15 ft
at perhaps 330 Kbaud or with *any* arcnet card up to 2000 ft at 1 Mbit/s.
Other than making the cable, installation is under an hour to read,
understand, load, configure and demonstrate.  I'd recommend it for a 
pure DOS solution, but I can't say anything about use under OS/2.

Jon Wood
Institute for Defense Analyses
(703) 845-6632, wood@ida.org

-- 
Jiansheng Zhao
Dept. Chem. Eng, Univ. of B. C., Canada. V6T 1Z4
zhao@unixg.ubc.ca
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: meyer@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Don Meyer)
Subject: Re: Virtual Packet driver for DOS VDMs?
Organization: UIUC College of Agriculture
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 23:09:35 GMT

Gary.Woodman@anu.edu.au (Gary Woodman) writes:

>Novell provides the hooks with LAN Workplace for OS/2, just add ODIPKT.
>IBM provides the hooks with NTS/2, just add IBMTOKEN.

Have you verified that this works on an ethernet system?  I have only been 
able to confirm it working on Token Ring based LANs.  (NTS/2, that is, no
experiences at all with Novell's...)

>And, last but not least, I think Dan Lanciani said here the other day that 
>Essex' TCP/2 has such support built-in.

This is good to hear, at least in rumor form - any confirmations?

Don
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Don Meyer     Network Manager, UIUC College of Ag Microcomputer Facility
internet:     dlmeyer@uiuc.edu		
member:       NRA, ISSC, IL Farm Bureau	 "Don't blame me, I voted Libertarian!"
					    Nancy Lord in '96!

"Clinton/Gore -- The American people deserve what they voted for!"
From: rwyble@schunix.uucp (Richard J. Wyble)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Os2You and DOS apps?
Date: 23 Jan 93 18:44:11 GMT
Organization: SCHUNIX Public Access Unix for Worcester County, MA, USA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

Os2You is not behaving well with either WordPerfect 5.1 DOS or dBase
IV 1.1 DOS. I can switch into their respective sessions, and can run
the programs after a fashion -- except that there is no cursor.

Any suggestions?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 rwyble@schunix.uucp                         Richard J. Wyble
 schunix!rwyble@transfer.stratus.com         Worcester, Massachusetts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: merlin@neuro.usc.edu (merlin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
Subject: Working on OS/2 2.1 beta X11R4 libraries -> 16 vs 32 bit socket API
Date: 24 Jan 1993 04:40:00 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: neuro.usc.edu

The IBM TCP/IP programming libraries and sample code supplied on the OS/2 2.1
11/92 PDK CDROM appears to be limited to 16 bit calls and compilation using
the Microsoft C 6.00A compiler/linker/etc.

I seem to recall seeing a reference to a 32 bit socket library somewhere on
the network.  Perhaps someone could point out where to get the 32 bit socket
library.

Thanks, Merlin

Merlin                        Never let it be forgot
The Magician                  That there once was a spot
King Arthur's Court           For one brief shining moment
Camelot                       That was known as Camelot

p.s.  Also, I'd like confirmation from anyone inside or outside IBM regarding
their plans to release or not to release X11R4 libraries in next few months.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking
From: gthome@bulldogs.austin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: How to network two PC? (How about LS Peer Services?)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:55:14 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.16g by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: gthome@dss1.austin.ibm.com
Organization: IBM Austin

In <laird.727632147@stable.ecn.purdue.edu> laird@stable.ecn.purdue.edu (Kyler Laird) writes:
>I just started installing IBM LAN Server 3.0 last night.  From the
>documentation it appears that peer services are quite independent
>from LAN Server.  Specifically, it is mentioned that peer resources
>may be shared even when the LAN Server is down.
>
>This makes me think that peer services could be used alone.  Although
>they aren't very powerful, for networking two PC's the one user limit
>for sharing would not be a problem.

This is true.  A peer server runs on an Lan Requester.  It allows one
connection at a time.  I find it very useful because I can share a public
directory on my requester without having all of the overhead of a full blown
server.  I do run NFS and could share a public directory that way, but
the Peer server is LOTS faster than NFS.

>
>I realize the idea of buying LAN Server 3.0 just for peer services
>is a bit whacky, but it seems that if this configuration is possible/
>usable, IBM should offer peer services as a separate product.
>
>--kyler
I'll pass this idea on to the approriate management team here at IBM.

=============================================================================
| Gerry Thome              | t/l  678-2256   fax : t/l  678-8597 | Internal |
| IBM-Austin               | (512)838-2256         (512)838-8597 | Zip 9132 |
| OS/2 DCE RPC Development | 11400 Burnet Rd, Austin, TX 78758   | MSU '89  |
| I don't speak for IBM in any way...                            | Go Dogs! |
=============================================================================

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.networking