HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Believe in youself, dammit! (was: Re: Singles Bar)
Date: 14 Sep 92 22:48:02 GMT
Organization: Bear, Stearns & Co. - FAST
In-reply-to: dy@depsych.Gwinnett.COM's message of 12 Sep 92 13:40:55 GMT



In article <wiqZqB1w164w@depsych.Gwinnett.COM> dy@depsych.Gwinnett.COM (Dr. Yes) writes:

   [very interesting and enlightening comments on math and Dr. Yes
    omitted for brevity ]

   The moral?  Well, if there is a "trick to" math -- namely
   understanding it conceptually -- maybe there _is_ a trick or
   algorithm or formula or something for meeting women.  If there is
   I'd like to know what it it.  So if somebody knows, the way
   Willard Quine knew the secret of math and logic, I'd appreciate it
   if they'd tell.

You know, having read this, I think that there may be a formula.  

I believe that it works for all kinds of relationships -- personal,
family, friends, colleagues, even your relationship with your
environment.

It can be summed up in two words:  LOVE UNCONDITIONALLY.

I think a definition is in order: To love unconditionally is to
contribute without expectation of any reward, or credit, or even love
in return.  It is to love in the face of no evidence.

This might mean contributing your support to an aquantance.  Or maybe
contributing your knowledge.  Or perhaps even just contributing your
presence.

I don't mean this to say that you should go and be a pain in the ass
to people to whom you are attracted, annoying them by being clingy.
I do mean that you should contribute to the lives of those around you.

When you contribute to others, and they understand that your
contribution in not conditional upon anything in return, they will get
it that you care about them.  And they will want to be with you.  And
in time, you too will receive such contribution...

If you keep giving, eventually you will receive.


					Spidey!!!




--
 /\ \  / /\  Josh Diamond                              		   jmd@bear.com
//\\ .. //\\ AKA Spidey!!!                        ...!ctr.columbia.edu!ursa!jmd
//\((  ))/\\
/  < `' >  \          Beauty is the purgation of superfluities. -- Michelangelo
From: oldman@coos.dartmouth.edu (Prakash Das)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re:  A Lurker's Tale
Date: 6 Sep 92 16:30:44 GMT
Article-I.D.: dartvax.1992Sep6.163044.17281
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

In article <dhar.43@oregon.uoregon.edu> dhar@oregon.uoregon.edu (Sanjay Dhar) writes:
>
>Just a little explanation that might help . Kiran is by default a woman's 
>name ( at least in India).
>Please no flames .... I haven't read the group in a while and don't where
>the whole confusion started :-)....
>dhar@oregon.uoregon.edu

The confusion started from my side. Being from India too (as I assume
Kiran is, at least originally), I presumed the default as you have
indicated.

Now we *all* (not just a few!) know that he is a male,
and it behooves me to declare it so and to put that question to rest!

-PD
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: A lurker goes to California
Date: 11 Sep 92 23:30:58 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Sep11.130922.4057@desire.wright.edu> wall@hel4.brl.mil (Jeff Wall) writes:
|In article <w7tngp+.tyger@netcom.com> tyger@netcom.com (Kitty in the Middle)
|writes:
|>In article <14525@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
|writes:
|>>In article <ntsnctq.tyger@netcom.com> tyger@netcom.com (Kitty in the Middle)
|writes:
|>>|In article <BuB1sn.FpE@acsu.buffalo.edu> v105l4lg@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (c
|pierre) writes:
|>>|>
|>>|>	Greetings there good buddy !!
|>>|Put the CB *down*, C!
|>> 
|>>There's an old CB joke that goes...
|>>
|>>Q: What is a good buddy?
|>>A: A good buddy is a guy that goes out, gets two blow jobs, and comes back
|>>   and gives you one.
|>
|>*groan* John, that was terrible! :P
|>
|>>|>	If you can, try and rent a car and buy a map in the process, because	
|>>|>that place is quite treacherous. Yes, in the blink of an eye you would be
|>>|>naked and broke around those folks. Party animals you see !!
|>>|That's a flaming lie! We only want his money! :)
|>>|
|>>There may also be some ProblemOlderWomen around that would prefer that
|>>he was naked as well.
|>
|>I suppose so, but as a net.toddler, I've no interest in that sort of stuff.
|>;)
|>
|>>|>	 I again suspect that you would be looking for an eyeopener too, so
|>>|>drive to Navada and look for the M. Ranch. 
|>>|Now if only it hadn't been shut down by the IRS for tax infractions...
|>>                                                         ^^^^^^^^^^
|>>Are you sure this is spelled correctly? 
|>
|>I am pretty sure it's spelled right, but it *could* be the wrong word, I
|>suppose. The IRS was involved in the demise of the aforementioned Ranch, 
|>but I didn't think the issue was tax *evasion*. I might be wrong, but I
|>hardly ever am...;)
|
|Well, it's nice to know somebody in this group can be labeled net.genious, and
|knows everything.  Have you considered starting your own column??  Dear Kitty??
| Or  maybe The Soc.singles Advisor??
  
We'll I always consult Tyger when there is something I want to know about, 
especially when it has to do about brothels in Navada (sic).  She's just a 
wealth of information.  Unfortunately she didn't get the joke or we wouldn't
be discussing this little flame on Tygers response that was tagged with that
cute little winking smiley.

For sensitive issues I rely on James.  
-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira     | Auspex Systems | "Auspex does not share my opinions.  |
| johnf@auspex.com | Santa Clara CA |  So Why am I still working here?"    |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Tallllll women....
From: parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz
Date: 10 Sep 1992 02:08:41 GMT
Reply-To: parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz
 <1992Sep7.024047.29667@peponi.wcc.govt.nz> <Bu7H2I.CKF@tik.vtt.fi>,<1992Sep9.183148.17860@javelin.sim.es.com>
Organization: Wellington City Council, Wgtn, NZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: blade.wcc.govt.nz

In article <1992Sep9.183148.17860@javelin.sim.es.com>, gclapp@javelin.sim.es.com (Glenn Clapp) writes:

>Now, that IS astounding!  A 60 cm height difference?  It seems that most
>women I meet who "say" they like tall men are really talking about
>6'2"  (188 cm) pip-squeaks.  Then when they meet me, it's all "well,
>not THAT tall..."  They don't realize that us of suprerior stature can
>wrap our arms around them twice. :)

A 5'2" friend of mine used to complain she got sick of dancing with guys'
belly-buttons.  I used to DREAM of dancing with a Belly-button ...
I get sick of being the first to notice the bald spot.










Rachel

"Supergoof"

   - -
   O O
    >
   \_/





Rachel

"Supergoof"

   - -
From: smith@wesson.Eng.Sun.COM (Nina S. Smith - SunSoft Product Marketing)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Blind dates scare me!
Date: 15 Sep 92 00:15:34 GMT
Reply-To: smith@wesson.Eng.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems
NNTP-Posting-Host: wesson

In article 13497@cbfsb.cb.att.com, jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <lb7t71INN37u@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> smith@wesson.Eng.Sun.COM writes:
>>In article 3611@wvnvms.wvnet.edu, un030025@wvnvms.wvnet.edu () writes:
 
>>my date's lugging a black bag containing God-knows-what and doing 
>>impersonations of the Church Lady, George Bush, Big Rick Stewart 
>>and Steve Masters all rolled into one!!!
>>
>>That was about about 11 months ago.  I had another blind date a few weeks ago.
>>Nice guy!  We made plans to go to dinner and then to a play in Berkeley.  We 
>>find a parking spot, he opens the back door of his car and pulls out . . . 
>>yep! *a black satchel*!!!  ARRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>-- Nina
>
>I'll bet they were doctors.
> 

Ha-uhh . . . the first one's a Financial Consultant and the second a 
Computing Consultant.  Omigod!  Blow me down with a feather . . . that's 
it!  No more dating with consultants . . . or is it consulting with dates?

-- Nina
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: Tallllll women....
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 92 05:36:25 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1992Sep7.004721.23004@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
>In article <29110@hydra.Helsinki.FI> taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina) writes:
>>If I remember right there was/is a 5'7" - 5'9" basketball player in
>>NBA.  Anyone remember him?
>Yes, I do.  I even know his name and the team he played for (Kanses City
>Kings).  :)

And soon after, of course, finding out they couldn't win with all those short
people, gave up Basketball, moved to Los Angles and started a Hockey team. 
:)
r.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: IZZYFU9@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Singles Bar
Date: 7 Sep 92 17:18:19 GMT

Anyone have any recommendation to singles bar around Los Angeles or
westwood area?
Thanks in advance.
From: dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Cradle Robbin?
Date: 9 Sep 92 18:55:45 GMT
Reply-To: dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

In article <1992Sep9.172209.2901@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>
>Dawn?
>
>A few questions about this ProblemYoungerMan?  Ignore this DCFS officer.
>Just HOW old is this, er, "man" you speak of?  :-)
>
>-Nance

<nose in air, snotty sniff>  I will ignore any scandalous and unfounded 
accusations, thank you very much.  My sweetheart is 26.

(Of course, that's in human years...)

Dawn
"Oh, Time!  Of all the dwellers here below 
You only elevate buffoons or fools,
Or him whose anus as an inkstand serves."
The Perfumed Garden of the Shaykh Nefzawl, translated by Sir Richard F. Burton
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: leg shaving
Date: 9 Sep 92 23:59:06 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Sep9.213414.26756@gvl.unisys.com> liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious) writes:
|If only it was as simple as quantity of time....
 
I recall a different interpretation for an acronym for CB fanatics.  CB 
actually stood for constantly broke.

|I speak to him but I know he still feel the same way about the leg shaving.
|I'm a gonna take this to e-mail...

Hello, Liz.  Welcome "Friends and Family of Leg Shavers Support Group".  Sit
down and make yourself comfortable.  James was about to introduce himself.
James?

"Hello.  My name is James Dutton and I have a bad haircut".

Bad Haircut?  This is the leg shavers group.  You want room 233 down the
hall.  In any case, I think those cute little red pigtails are kinda cute.

Good luck, James.

OK, Liz, would you like to introduce yourself?

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira     | Auspex Systems | "Auspex does not share my opinions.  |
| johnf@auspex.com | Santa Clara CA |  So Why am I still working here?"    |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ron@turing.toronto.edu (Ron Wessels)
Subject: Re: Fall classes have started
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
Date: 16 Sep 92 03:31:03 GMT

ANNE@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU writes:
>Ron,  you forgot: ...

That's true, and I'm ashamed of myself.  The problem is that I am
labouring under the clearly inferior Canadian education system,
where I am forced to add extra 'u's to words, and append "eh"s to
the end of my sentences.  Oh, what I would give to be able to live
in the Great U.S. of A.!

-- 
Ron Wessels		University of Toronto		ron@turing.toronto.edu
From: wjb@moscom.UUCP (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Desperation (was Re: Commitment--The C-word?)
Date: 13 Sep 92 00:09:10 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford, NY
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz wrote:
: I always thought I must be weird not liking musk, but I'm just not attracted to
: moose.  

Why not?  They're probably taller than you are :-)
-- 
"Bless me, Father; I ate a lizard."
"Was it an abstinence day, and was it artificially prepared?"
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: pekka@tmt.tele.fi (Pekka Ahonen)
Subject: Re: Losers of the world UNITE!!!
Keywords: Losers, World, People
Organization: PTT Finland, Telematics
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 09:25:33 GMT

>In article <1992Sep7.005247.3340@panix.com> jis@panix.com (Jack Szwergold) writes:
>> 
>>What do you find that you do differently when you are single as
>>compared to when you have an SO?

At least I've found out many new ways how to use my furniture. For
example: bed is also good to sleep in, table is also good to eat from,
chair is also good to sit on and shower is also a good place to take a
shower aso.

BTW I'm a single (just in case if you didn't notice ;-)

- Brandon
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: intrigue@milton.u.washington.edu (Angelwing)
Subject: Las Vegas Revisited
Keywords: Ick, yuk, ptooie
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 19:06:37 GMT

He's at it again!  Anybody else get another email from Veeeeegas?

Angelwing - why me?

*------------------------------------------------------------------*
* Angelwing       |  "And just where do you think you're going     *
* U. of Washington|   dressed like *that*?                         *
*                 |                            -  My Dad           *
*------------------------------------------------------------------*
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Tallllll women....
From: parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz
Date: 9 Sep 1992 23:38:00 GMT
Reply-To: parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz
Organization: Wellington City Council, Wgtn, NZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: blade.wcc.govt.nz

In article <1992Sep08.193923.2921@oneb.almanac.bc.ca>, kmcvay@oneb.almanac.bc.ca (Ken Mcvay) writes:

>Why one would strike me that way, and one would not, I cannot say; I suspect
>that there may be some primoral threat to the male personna in all of this,
>unless I'm just a wimp. I liked her, and thought of her as a friend, but I
>got _very_ uncomfortable when she stood directly in front of me to chat -
>territorial imperative, perhaps?

Perhaps with the beautiful one you weren't looking at the overall picture?
If the bigger one was as big or bigger than you, you felt like millions of
women to all over the world who are physically overpowered by men.
Imagine going through life when EVERYBODY was bigger than you?
Fortunately I don't have that problem.
 


>>Rachel
>>(6' btw)
>
>Did you often bump your head on low doorframes when you were young? <I still
>have scars :-)>

Did I?!!!!  I still do - all the signs inside shops are at just the right
height to hit the bridge of my nose!






Rachel

"Supergoof"

   - -
   O O
    >
   \_/




Rachel

"Supergoof"

   - -
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: chemistry / love at first sight : fact or
From: parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 02:36:07 GMT
Reply-To: parks_typ@med.wcc.govt.nz
Organization: Wellington City Council, Wgtn, NZ

In article <1992Sep3.121751.5335@exu.ericsson.se>, exujbl@exu.ericsson.se (Jerry Blackerby 214-907-7810) writes:
>I am not single, but do read SOC.SINGLES sometimes.  This subject caught my
>eye.
>
>I met my wife on March 20, 1955.  We started dating one week later.  We
>were engaged two weeks after that.  We married on July 8, 1955 and celebrated
>our 37th anniversary this year.
>
>It can happen!
>
>Jerry


Congratulations!  

There is hope for us hopeless romantics who fondly hope
that love will last.




- R
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Can we can the suck-up bit?
Keywords: encourage friendship?
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 17:39:55 GMT

In article <14521@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <1992Sep9.041726.9502@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
>|In article <1992Sep9.031954.18169@samba.oit.unc.edu> Bathsheba.Grossman@bbs.oit.unc.edu (Bathsheba Grossman) writes:
>|>In article <72095@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>|>...
>|>>I'll come if Sheba does.
>|>
>|>A generous suggestion.  How are your Gazongas? perhaps we won't have
>|>to bother with Tryg at all & could just compliment one another.
>|
>|Well, if you won't let me practice the art of sincere appreciation upon
>|you (I have to keep in practice or risk losing my status as 
>|"silver-tongued devil"), hopefully you'll at least give me a chance to
>|set up the video cameras.  
> 
>If you do, I also have some videos recently taken from a tree near a freshly
>mowed lawn.  Perhaps we can discuss a trade. 

Hmmmm...I'll think about it; right now I'm still working out a deal for
some of those shots of Dawn taken by the airport security cameras.
(Unfortunately, those are black-and-white and taken from a very odd
angle, but I think they'd still be a worthwhile addition to my collection.)

>We'll if Sheba keeps on rejecting your appreciative prose you can join
>Larry, Larry, James, and I for an evening of babe scamming.  


Scamming?  As in defrauding?  Hmmmm...dunno 'bout that--I did have an
interesting time engaging in "babe scanning" a while ago, though--a
woman I know was getting a rather large tattoo on an area of her 
anatomy not generally exposed to the general public; she had the 
outline done first and was going to come back for the colors, but
hadn't made up her mind on what color scheme to use.  So, she dropped
by and I slowly ran a hand-held scanner over her body, printing out 
the results to a laser printer so that she could try several different
variations with colored pencils.

Trygve   (Who might be willing to scan in women's bodies even if they
          didn't have tattoos.)
From: morton@cali.rtp.dg.com
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Summary: dating a friend
Date: 5 Sep 92 05:15:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: dg-rtp.1992Sep5.051549.24626
Organization: Data General Corporation, RTP, NC.

>>>The other day I asked people if they would date a friend.  I got *three*
>>>replies.  Two would date a friend, one said that too much friendship
>>>is a bad thing.

	My time off is too valuable to waste on unknowns, and naturally
I wouldn't date an enemy, so friends is a natural choice !
Besides, you must be friends before you are lovers, or the love thing
goes to psyche/soc/mental/personal_problem land.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Subject: Re: E.W. - Weddings....
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 20:57:12 GMT

In article <14522@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
>In article <ewillims.716049830@unix1.tcd.ie> ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
> 
>|	Dart Boards?? I've never yet met an Irishman who plays darts!
>
>Hmmm.  I play darts regularily in a place called O'shea's.  I have in fact
>played against several Irishmen.  

I've dabbled in the sport.  However, my approach to the throw would send
people running for cover.  Not that I had any particular loss of control,
mind you, it's just that people ain't used to seeing a zuki style dart
throw emanating from the hara. :)
From: wjb@moscom.UUCP (Bill de Beaubien)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: chemistry / love at first sight : fact or fiction?
Date: 12 Sep 92 04:29:02 GMT
Reply-To: wjb@moscom.com
Organization: Moscom Corp., Pittsford, NY
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

trygve lode (tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu) wrote:
: It's traditional--after all, if the people you were interested in were
: also interested in you, it would probably upset the whole order of the
: universe.  There are probably plenty of people who feel chemistry with
: you that you don't have any interest in--with the net result that 
: everybody keeps buying the latest products, from lipstick to cars,
: that are supposed to make you suddenly appealing to the ones you're
: attracted to.

Besides, if it didn't work that way, we wouldn't have anything to talk about.
Of course, most of us would be too busy to talk about the fact that we didn't 
have to talk about, so I guess it'd work.
-- 
"Bless me, Father; I ate a lizard."
"Was it an abstinence day, and was it artificially prepared?"
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bill de Beaubien / wjb@moscom.com
From: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Blind dates scare me!
Date: 14 Sep 92 15:34:50 GMT
Reply-To: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Dept., Madison, WI

In <72347@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>un030025@wvnvms.wvnet.edu writes:
>>	What ever happened to the good old American girl? If there are any that
>>are reading this, let me know. I just want to talk to someone I don't know who
>>is NORMAL!

>Welcome to soc.singles. We're all normal here. 

BWAAA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!  he-heh-heh...

-- 
Michael Rawdon				 rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department, Madison, WI

"It's a summer of existence and the fall of pain."
					- Men Without Hats
From: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu (Michael Rawdon)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Believe in youself, dammit! (was: Re: Singles Bar)
Date: 14 Sep 92 22:08:41 GMT
Reply-To: rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Dept., Madison, WI

In <lb9f6iINN5ot@news.bbn.com> dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>In article <rawdon.716262195@cs.wisc.edu> rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu writes:
>>This sounds to me a lot like saying, "The fact that you've done poorly at
>>math before does not indicate that you'll do poorly in the future."  Sure,
>>it doesn't mean conclusively that it won't, but, given a reasonable amount
>>of experience with math (whatever "reasonable" is), it DOES indicate IMO
>>that it is VERY, VERY UNLIKELY that you will do well at it in the future.

>Back when I was teaching remedial math to non-traditional college students,
>I used to see students all the time who would tell me on the first day of
>class, "I'm very bad at math and I'll never be able to learn this," and
>then tell me on the last day of class "Is this all there is to it?  Why
>wasn't I getting A's all along?  This was easy."  Too many of them just
>weren't properly motivated before, or they were told that they were stupid
>and couldn't learn.  When they were in school voluntarily, and given a little
>encouragement, they did a lot of things they wouldn't have thought possible.

So far this approach hasn't worked for me:

1) Learning foreign languages (granted, the only one I have even the vaguest
   interest in learning is Esperanto), or
2) Learning the C programming language (the most vile, evil programming
   language this side of assembly; it's always such a joy when I can use a
   Real Programming Language like Modula-2 or Scheme).

Oh, well.

-- 
Michael Rawdon				 rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu
University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department, Madison, WI

Mondays are not part of the productive work week:
	...eight hours and all I did today is compose this memo...
	...actually, it's more like a sentence than a whole memo...
	...and it probably needs a verb to be a sentence...
							- Dilbert
Newsgroups: soc.singles