HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Tough Schedule - an Update
Date: 21 Nov 1992 15:51:31 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

HI Guys
Here are the strength of schedule for teams in the
remaining 6 matches based on the performance this
year.
Obviously there has been a lot of turnover from
my posting at the start of this year and Denver has 
slipped from 1 to bottom 9near bottom) of the pile.
But they will not be complaining:-)
Seattle has the most devillish schedule:
Denver twice, Pittsburgh, Kansas City,
Philadelphia, and San Diego all Looking
like headed to play-off right now.

Not that this proves a great deal sio 
don't start flamimg me. Just some
statistical food for thought.




        SEATTLE       38          22  0.6333333    
        RAIDERS       36          24  0.6000000    
        GIANTS	      35          25  0.5833333    
	MINNESOTA     34          26  0.5666667
        RAMS	      34          26  0.5666667    
	WASHINGTON    33	  27  0.5500000    
        JETS          33          27  0.5500000    
        PHILADELPHIA  32          28  0.5333334    
        PHOENIX       32          28  0.5333334    
        CHICAGO       32          28  0.5333334    
        NEW ORLEANS   32          28  0.5333334    
        ATLANTA       32          28  0.5333334    
        DETROIT	      31          29  0.5166667     above avg.
        BUFFALO       31          29  0.5166667    
                                                  -----------
        SAN FRANSISCO 30          30  0.5000000    
        HOUSTON       30          30  0.5000000    average
        CLEVELAND     30          30  0.5000000    
                                                  ------------
        DALLAS        29          31  0.4833333    		
        MIAMI         29          31  0.4833333    
        TAMPA BAY     28          32  0.4666667     below avg.
        NEW ENGLAND   28          32  0.4666667    
        DENVER        28          32  0.4666667    
        GREEN BAY     27          33  0.4500000    
        INDIANAPOLIS  26          34  0.4333333    
        PITTSBURGH    25          35  0.4166667    
        CINCINNATI    24          36  0.4000000    
        KANSAS CITY   21          39  0.3500000    
        SAN DIEGO     20          40  0.3333333    


Bye,


		******   ******
                     *   *
                ******   ******
                *             *
                ******   ******        and counting down .
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN P. GLORIA)
Subject: Re: Troy Aikman
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 18:55:22 GMT

In article <2956@devnull.mpd.tandem.com> dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch) writes:
>In article <1992Nov18.041119.12857@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>>Food for thought. Compare Steve Young's performance when he was down
>>20-3 and how me came through. Big difference. The comparsion is 
>>startling. Two QBs under pressure and how one choked and how one
>>came through big time.
>
>Oh, get off it, Gloria.  If this is food for thought, you must be skipping
>meals left and right.
>
>Aikman did not "choke".  If he had "choked", they wouldn't have had two
>good shots in the endzone.  The first one was well defensed, and the second
>one, IMHO, wasn't Aikman's fault at all -- the receiver pulled up *after*
>the ball was thrown.  If Martin hadn't inexplicably stopped, the pass would
>have been on target.  I think Martin thought the throw was going to Novacek,
>who was behind him, and didn't want to intefere on the play.  In any case,
>it wasn't Aikman's doing.
>
Come on Welch. Get a grip of yourself and the game in question.
Aikman did NOT exhibit composure under pressure. If can't see that,
then I wasting my time. It is a team effort. Remember Brent Jones'
winning TD pass against the Saints. He knew what he was doing and
so did Young. In your scenario, it is obvious the opposite was in
affect.

>Here's some more food for thought:  where was Young's brilliant performance
>against the Cardinals?  Oh, I guess he choked.]
>
Danny, Danny, Danny! Answer that yourself! It was an aberration.
The Niner team fucked up that Sunday, not just Young.  I am not
going to get in an ongoing argument with you, Mr. Welch. You
have better things to do, I'm sure. The bottom line is that Aikman,
despite all his talent, is not yet ready to lead his team all the
way. I will be the first person to give Aikman and company credit
if they do win it all. Hey, shit happens. :-)

-- 
        ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
 		"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination
	       is out of focus."   -     Mark Twain
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: freshlt@quig17.alleg.edu (Timothy Freshly)
Subject: Re: The Pacific NW: Football Hell
Organization: Allegheny College
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:32:51 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.004024.13358@serval.net.wsu.edu>  
jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer) writes:
[stuff deleted]

> Bingo!  I think we've got a winner.  How many points have the  
Seahawks
> scored again this year?

[more stuff deleted]

	During an update of the Oilers/Vikes game yesterday, it was  
mentioned that the Viking defense has scored more touchdowns than the  
Seahawk offense.  Can anyone validate this?

		Tim

-- NewsGrazer, a NeXTstep(tm) news reader, posting --
M>UQR=&8P7&%N<VE[7&9O;G1T8FQ<9C!<9FUO9&5R;B!#;W5R:65R.WT*7&UA
M<F=L,3(P"EQM87)G<C$R,`I<<&%R9%QT>#DV,%QT>#$Y,C!<='@R.#@P7'1X
M,S@T,%QT>#0X,#!<='@U-S8P7'1X-C<R,%QT>#<V.#!<='@X-C0P7'1X.38P
M,%QF,%QB,%QI,%QU;#!<9G,R-"!);B!A<G1I8VQE(#PQ.3DR3F]V,38N,#`T
M,#(T+C$S,S4X0'-E<G9A;"YN970N=W-U+F5D=3X@:FIU;F=B875`>6]D82YE
M96-S+G=S=2YE9'4@*$II;2!*=6YG8F%U97(I('=R:71E<SI<"EMS='5F9B!D
M96QE=&5D75P*7`H*/B!":6YG;R$@($D@=&AI;FL@=V4G=F4@9V]T(&$@=VEN
M;F5R+B`@2&]W(&UA;GD@<&]I;G1S(&AA=F4@=&AE(%-E86AA=VMS7`H^('-C
M;W)E9"!A9V%I;B!T:&ES('EE87(_7`I<"EMM;W)E('-T=69F(&1E;&5T961=
M7`I<"@E$=7)I;F<@86X@=7!D871E(&]F('1H92!/:6QE<G,O5FEK97,@9V%M
M92!Y97-T97)D87DL(&ET('=A<R!M96YT:6]N960@=&AA="!T:&4@5FEK:6YG
M(&1E9F5N<V4@:&%S('-C;W)E9"!M;W)E('1O=6-H9&]W;G,@=&AA;B!T:&4@
M4V5A:&%W:R!O9F9E;G-E+B`@0V%N(&%N>6]N92!V86QI9&%T92!T:&ES/UP*
*7`H)"51I;0I]"F9E
`
From: curtis@optima.UUCP (Curtis E. Dyreson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: AFC TEAMS STINK
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:22:43 GMT
Distribution: usa

From article <1992Nov16.065134.7586@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>, by lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor):
> Better concentrate on "best of NFC vs best of AFC". I don't give a shit
> about "NFC vs AFC at a conference level". 

SuperBowl evidence shows that one team in the NFC is better than 
the best of the AFC, e.g., that there exists a superior team and
that team just happens to come from the NFC.  It has yet to be 
demonstrated how SuperBowl evidence alone confers any special 
status on the rest of the NFC (or even the best of the NFC).

Lemma: The Cardinals will suck anywhere you put them in the AFC
Proof: Do I really need any?  Just two words: Bill Bidwell.

Lemma2: Put the 49ers anywhere in the AFC and SuperBowls will still 
        result in blowouts.
Proof: See NFC championship evidence.

I would say that this is the issue we are "debating," but since we agree
there is no debate (and I posted in my previous article that we are
in perfect agreement).

Only you have introduced the claim that the best of the NFC taken
as a group (read playoff teams) is better than the best of the AFC
taken as a group (read playoff teams) over the past 5-8 years.  
I have never contended this claim, nor am I likely too (see the Sports
Illustrated article on this for some fairly persuasive statistical 
evidence).

> Of course we can always argue what X are. Media have been talking about the
> reasons for years. 

Guess I missed it, what is special about the N preceeding an FC that
makes a team more likely to win a SuperBowl?

Curtis Dyreson
From: rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Phoenix Cardinals Nov 19 ,92
Date: 19 Nov 92 21:07:17 GMT
Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino CA, USA

In article <RLAG10-191192114737@222.14.80.23> RLAG10@email.sps.mot.com (Gary Gavlick) writes:
>Right Outside Linebacker Ken Harvey had reconstructive knee surgery on left
>knee to repair a ruptured anterior cruicate ligament and will be out 10 to
>12 months.  He has been placed on injured reserve.


Thanks for the detail Gary, ouch. I hate to be a pessimist but Harvey is a
speed linebacker(although he is very strong) and I doubt if he can come
back all the way in one year. He may as well count out the rest of this
year and all next year to be fully recovered. Its one thing for Rosenbach
to come back, but I do not think the strain on the knee for a QB is as bad
as it will be for an outside LB like Harvey.
>Left Outside Linebacker Freddie Joe Nunn was ruled out of Sunday's game
>against Dallas because of a torn left knee ligament.

I have sort of figured this will be Nunns last year in Phoenix, because he
is basically just a pass rusher, which is fine for a DE but now he is playing
LB and he is not much against the run. Hopefully his knee is not serious
as he could still provide somebody with a pass rushing DE for next year,
and if the Cards were to go to a 4-3 it might be Phoenix who uses him at
DE.




Russ Smith
*******************************************************************************
"I have an office, gold records on the wall. Just leave a message, maybe 
I'll call."
                   "Life's Been Good"--- Joe Walsh
********************************************************************************
From: yhl@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Stallion)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK!!!!!!!!!  Oilers LOSE TO THE FISH!!!!
Date: 22 Nov 92 21:18:33 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

GODDAMMMIT!!!!!!

OILERS LOSE AGAIN ON THE LAST SECOND!

What's the matter with the Oilers? I think the BIGGEST mistake Oilers made was few years ago when they let the place kicker Tony Zandejaz go.  Since they let him go, Oilers lost many key games because of missed field goals.  The ones I can remember are against Redskins last year, against Bronocos in last year's playoff, against Steelers a couple of weeks ago, and today against Dolphis.

Al del Greco has been a consistant kicker throughout the year but he missed few key field goals under pressure.  I won't  be surprised del Greco gets waived this week, even though I seriously doubt this will happen.  

Besides the missed field goals, the Oilers lost three of the starters in the beginning of the game due to injuries: Ernest Givins, Don Maggs, and Lamar Lathan.  I think that helped the Dolphins stay in the game.  This game should have been a blow out for the Oilers considering the time of possession.

That was my thought for the game.

Stallion

University of Pennsylvania
yhl@eniac.seas.upenn.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: tech@maitland.cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini)
Subject: Re: Christie saves Bills
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 15:22:16 GMT

In article <4f2RQsu00iV08_B5gB@andrew.cmu.edu> Erik Karl Witte <ew2r+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>>        Without their kicker Steve Christie, they're nothing!  Thomas only had
>>only a little more than 100 yds. tot. off. and NO tD's.  Kelly didn't have a
>>good night.  Neither Lofton or Beebe had long catches.  

And without John Offerdahl the Fins are nothing. Neither of these
statements are really true. The bills looked pretty good to me.
Christie only looked so good because he was on the field so much. He
was on the field so much because the Fins defense was not bad at all.
You have to hand it to the bills for coming down to Florida and
keeping it together for four quarters and winning the game. They did a
good job and really pissed me off. They won; what more needs to be
said? If I had to point to a single weakness on the fins side (I'll
leave pointing out bills weaknesses to bills fans) I would have to say
that the offensive line sucked again; just like in the jets game. 

>>        As a Dolphin fan, I'd just like to say that I think the Bills got
>>lucky.  Granted, they pulled it off, but not my playing well.  Hey Shula...

As a Fin fan I have to say the bills never layed down and died. The
Dolphins did.

>Granted, the Bills are a weaker team without Christie.  He's an
>important addition.  The Dolphins have a bunch of guys, who, if they
>lost, would weaken the team.  Every team does.  Reality Check, Kurt - if
>a team loses their important players, they're not gonna do as well.  If
>you think the Dolphins are immune - their line didn't look so hot with
>their starting center out did it?  I'm sick and fucking tired of all
>sorts of whiners saying that a given team is nothing without a given
>player or group of players.

Oops. I can see I screwed up the attributions. I think Kurt wrote
everything after the >> and Erik after the >. But I agree. See above.
>
>Were it not for Kelly's good passing, the Bills strong defensive work,
>Christie's FGs, Thomas's running for 154 yards, Bruce Smith, Daryl
>Talley, Cornelius Bennett,  Andre Reed, James Lofton, Don Beebe, Keith
>McKeller, Metzelaars, Kenneth Davis and maybe a couple of other players
>- Buffalo would have gotten killed.  I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU STUPID BUFFALO
>FANS DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT.

Gee. It this sarcasm? Hopefully the Fins and bills will play again
this year. I look forward to these games.

Tony (go houston) Travaglini
tech@cs.ucf.edu
From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:20:00 GMT
Subject: Re: intentional grounding (Re: Bills vs. Dolphins)
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro

Sad but true.  Even though the TE was left in to block, wasn't in a pattern
and only turned around a second before the pass...it isn't a penalty.  Kelly
threw it away for sure but caught a break that the TE was right there.  Had
it been two OLs then it would have gotten a flag.  The football Gods had
something to do with this play.
From: sajja@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (Rajeev  Sajja)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: It's only the Packers
Date: 18 Nov 92 02:01:09 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <1992Nov17.203439.13782@bmw.mayo.edu> bergerson@mayo.edu writes:
> stuff deleted...

>as a Viking fan, I especially know that the Pack should never be taken lightly.
>It is too bad that the Iggles and RanDULL Cunninham are too good to be bothered
>playing a lowly team like the packers.  We all know that since their big win
>over the cowboys they have been a lock in the Super Bowl.  :^)  :^)

Hype goes on everywhere. Dont tell me that there is no super bowl
talk in minnesota and the dallas camps.
>
> I think the Vikings should be more worried about their rematch with the 
>Pack than the game with the super bowl bound Iggles.  The Iggles will be 
>looking past the Vikes to the Super Bowl anyways.
>
yeah worry about the packers. Take it game at a time dudes, otherwise
if you start thinking further ahead you can see your offense having 
sleepless nights thinking about the eagles D.
Get an offense before you come out and talk about beating a good offensive
team. I am not saying that the eagles have a great offense, but they sure
do have a better one that the vikes at this point. had it not been
for the fact that the vikes D scoring TD's think where you would be in the
division. Hey, what a great divisionthat is NFC Central. I am impressed.
You are getting some competition from other teams in that division for the
division title. Hey, but dennis green has done a heck of
a job with the vikes down there.

>Thank you Green Bay, you made my day even after the vikes lost.  
>Ha, ha   RanDULL,     No class.......

Give nme a break will you. He is still the 4th best QB in the league, coming
OFF a season ending knee injury. I can buy that any day!!
i Would say though that the coaches here are not using the potential of randall. 
>
>--
>*******************************************************************************
>Chad D. Bergerson                            Internet: bergerson@mayo.edu

-Rajeev[A Scrambling Eagle]SajjA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ragraca@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Randy A. Graca)
Subject: Re: Lions QB situation [question]
Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI.
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:31:57 GMT

john@porta.b24a.ingr.com (John Nolin) writes:

>What happened to Peete on Sunday?  Was he hurt or did he just suck?

He just sucked.  Lions' coach Wayne Fontes apparently thought that
putting Erik Kramer in would possibly spark the team.  It didn't work.
Kramer sucked too.

>Any insight to next week's Lion quarterback?

I don't think Fontes has decided for sure yet.  He was quoted in the
Detroit media earlier last week as saying that he would like to get a
look at Andre Ware this year, although I doubt that Ware will be
starting any games.  We'll just have to wait and see on this one.

>-John-
 
rag

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: Re: Christie saves Bills
Originator: delarocq@c00505-119rd.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:40:43 GMT




   You can say that.. MARINO IS THE DOLPHINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!


   Ok?? It can be said about either team... :)

   Anyway, it was a good game.. :)
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
1988,1989,1990,1991 AFC East Division Champions
1991,1992 AFC Conference Champions

Hungry for some fish.. Monday Night Football, November 16, 1992..

If you are a Buffalo Bills fan, email me at delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu
so we can talk all about the games, insight, etc.
If you are a Packers fan, let me know. I am interested in any news
out of Green Bay...
A PROUD MEMBER OF THE BILLS COALITION TAKING THE BET II.
From: bittle@niktow.canisius.edu (Jason Bittle)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Refs Calls (+ attention Dave Mikesell)
Date: 19 Nov 92 17:53:55 GMT
Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo NY. 14208


Well, a comment about that, with this hypothetical situation:

Say a receiver catches the ball at the 10 yard line.  He runs for the corner
of the endzone.  At approx. the 1/2" yard line, he get's knocked out of
bounds, but has never physically made contact with out of bounds.  (I.e. he's
still in mid-air, floating if you will.)  Can he still score a touchdown, if
he sneaks the ball inside the cone?  (it's a great trick)..


-- 
ciao,                             
Jason Bittle (bittle@canisius.edu) 
(a.k.a. Pillsbury Dough Boy )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Subject: Re: NFC East loses!
Organization: Houses of the Holy
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 23:37:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.042424.111667@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>, mk0e@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MAHEENDRA BABURAO KASMALKAR) writes:
> I am not a woofer but after reading all those moronic posts by NFC East
> woofers for so long how could I let this one go.
> 
> All teams in NFC East lost today!
> 
> This doesn't happen everyday. So I am relishing this one chance of a big WOOF!

According to the ESPN Sportscenter dept. this has never before happened.


-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (The Purple Bleeder )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: DALLAS LOSES!!! YES!!!
Date: 16 Nov 92 00:18:30 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

Boy...Oh..Boy.....
The fans in Phily and Washington should breath a great sigh
of releif, that their teams are still only 2 behind the Boys.

The Boys have now been brought back to earth.

Well the Vikes play the Rams in 2 weeks and I am edgy now.

S.H
the Purple Bleeder
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: The Rams RAM it up/down (was: Re: Cowboys Meal Menu)
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:47:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.164640.6424@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> mfiguero@lonestar.utsa.edu (Miguel . Figueroa) writes:
>
>  I wouldn't be too confident John Gloria, The 49ers might have whipped
>  Atlanta twice but they barely managed to beat the Rams at the Stick a
>  few games back and have to go to Anaheim this week with a confident
>  Rams team!
>
>  Miguel
>

You missed the whole point of my post. My post was NOT about 
confidence, it was about pointing out some, not ALL, Dallas fans
postings/rantings who were predicting a killing of the lambs.
A WIN is WIN and a loss is a loss. I for one, respect the
RAMS, I don't like them, but I am happy the FOOTBALL GODS
listened to my prayers in slapping the 'Boz with a loss.
Yes, you are right, the RAMS are not be taken lightly, just
ask the 'Boz! :-) The same goes the 'Boz, I respect them,
only because any team can win/lose on game-day.
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
"I do not think that winning is the most important thing. 
I think winning is the only thing."    - Bill Veeck
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Troy Aikman
Date: 20 Nov 92 16:31:16 GMT
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <1992Nov18.041119.12857@PacBell.COM> jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>Food for thought. Compare Steve Young's performance when he was down
>20-3 and how me came through. Big difference. The comparsion is 
>startling. Two QBs under pressure and how one choked and how one
>came through big time.

Oh, get off it, Gloria.  If this is food for thought, you must be skipping
meals left and right.

Aikman did not "choke".  If he had "choked", they wouldn't have had two
good shots in the endzone.  The first one was well defensed, and the second
one, IMHO, wasn't Aikman's fault at all -- the receiver pulled up *after*
the ball was thrown.  If Martin hadn't inexplicably stopped, the pass would
have been on target.  I think Martin thought the throw was going to Novacek,
who was behind him, and didn't want to intefere on the play.  In any case,
it wasn't Aikman's doing.

Here's some more food for thought:  where was Young's brilliant performance
against the Cardinals?  Oh, I guess he choked.]

Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pboxrud@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul D Boxrud)
Subject: Re: Predictions
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 19:51:43 GMT

In article <By6o0x.GAA@acsu.buffalo.edu> v128r82w@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Ralph
L d'Ambrosio) writes:
>
>Central:
>     THe Vikings. Assuming the Vikings beat the Packers, there magic number is

You might want to consult Randall before making anymore assumptions about the 
Packers. :-)

You do have a point that the Vikes have a major advantage right now, and they 
will probably win the division.  However considering the way both teams are 
currently playing, I think this is kind of a wild assumption.

Paul
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (The Purple Bleeder )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Oilers/Vikes......Comments
Date: 15 Nov 92 23:38:28 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.Bxs704.E03
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


Have Gannon and the rest of the Viking O been spoilt by their
defence :-):-).

Well, they have started feeling cozy and secure and feel:
"Guys, we don't need to do anything. The D will do it
for us. We have to just punt back the ball in 4 downs and
just see to it we do not turn it over and we will win".

I hope coach Green has seen enough and gives the O a good
pep talk after this game.

S.H
The Purple Bleeder.