HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pugh@pico.math.ucla.edu (David Pugh)
Subject: Re: Not in a Rush to see Rush anymore
Organization: UCLA Mathematics Department
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 23:29:03 GMT

In article <1en3icINNl4q@agate.berkeley.edu> don@ocf.berkeley.edu (Don Bromley) writes:
>In article <1992Nov22.032626.10475@math.ucla.edu> pugh@pico.math.ucla.edu (David Pugh) writes:
>>Well, I used to be a fan of Rush but now that Clinton has won
>>and Rush has started this TV show, I can only say the following:
>>
>> Rush is BORING, PATHETIC and REDUNDANT.
>
>  That's why he has the #1 radio show, top 5 syndicated TV show, and a
>  best-selling book?  I'd like to be that boring.
>
He used to be interesting before the election, but now he just seems to
be scraping the barrel for something to talk about. He's much better on
the radio where he talks about himself and what he's been up to. His
Clinton bashing is pointless and not at all constructive.

>>David (the AntiRusht)
>>
>>--
>>|-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-|
>>   David Pugh,  UCLA,  CA         |     Hot Dog, Jumping Frog
>>   pugh@math.ucla.edu             |     Albuquerque  -  Prefab Sprout
>>|-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-|
>
>  Ahah... a UCLA student... that explains everything.

Yes it explains why you are a moron because :

I am an Assistant Adjunct Professor with a BSc, MSc and a PhD so stick
that in yer pipe and smoke it.


--
|-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-|
 David A. Pugh      | Hot Dog, Jumping Frog, Albuquerque            > PREFAB
 pugh@math.ucla.edu | Best agree you and me we're only nightingales > SPROUT
|-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: mitcheec@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu (Elliott Mitchell)
Subject: Re: Here's why I love this guy...
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Vanderbilt University
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 14:46:00 GMT

In article <p9kql9c@lynx.unm.edu>, 
hagerjd@leo.unm.edu (John D. Hager) writes...

>NO!  I don't care who you are, what color your skin is, what your beliefs are,
>etc.., NO individual is powerless!  Especially in this, the greatest of all
>countries in the world!  Every individual ultimately has the final say in his/
>her own destiny.  Your destiny is what you create.  Don't wait for someone
>who doesn't even know who you are, to legislate your destiny.  I guarantee,
>if you stand on your own two feet, respect yourself, and fight for yourself,
>you will gain much more respect for yourself, and people will gain MUCH more
>respect for you.  That's how to get ahead.  Don't rely on the government to
>make sure you get ahead, take it upon yourself!
> 
While I appreciate the encouragment that John and others have given over 
the last few days, I am amused, nonetheless, at the assumption on which it 
is based.

It would appear that my correspondants believe that I am a person of color, 
or with beliefs or other attributes that make me different from them.  They 
are encouraging me, therefore, to rise above my circumstances and become 
=====>>>>>  *** EXCELLENT !!!!!  *****  <<<<<=====.  I thank them again for 
that but it reveals,  IMHO that only a person of color, or with specific 
beliefs or attributes can feel about the subject the way I have described.

Well, I must admit that I am simply a 47-year-old white male, one who has 
seen only the slightest of discrimination against me (in my earlier years, 
when my hair was bright red) and who has had almost no obstacles placed in 
my way.

That doesn't stop me from understanding that people who are not like me 
have encountered totally different circumstances, oweing largely to the 
fact that they are not like me.

My point is, I have broken loose from the blinders that white-males seem to 
be born with, (to some extent and not, I will freely admit, as much as I 
would like) so why can't thEwIndBag?

+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
| Elliott Mitchell
|  Peabody College at Vanderbilt University
|  Nashville, Tenn. Home of the Grand Ole Opry
|  IN: mitcheec@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu | BN: MITCHEEC@VUCTRVAX
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Subject: Re: Democratic Whiners Can't Take It
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 15:49:30 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <1992Nov21.055944.8009@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:

>...answer this question: How would the normal, heterosexual 
>male react to a shower full of nude women?  I expect that the normal, 
>homosexual male would react in the same manner in response to a shower full 
>of nude men.  I have yet to hear any homosexuals-in-the-army advocate address 
>this point.

    You can take it out of the subjunctive.  As stated unnumerable times
already, the military *already* has lots of gay men *and* lesbians.
They're just discreet (their jobs depend on it).  You can bet that if this
were a problem, it'd a) already be well-documented, and b) be used by the
anti-gay lobby to support keeping the discrimination in effect.
    Perhaps the red-blooded hets could learn something...

-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ. 
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: session@seq.uncwil.edu (Zack C. Sessions)
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch - Day 17
Organization: Univ. of North Carolina @ Wilmington
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 01:07:06 GMT

jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:

>Zack, only you could possibly think that anything in the Rush Limbaugh 
>newsgroup would ever have anything to do with the price of eggs in China. 
>If you're not sharp enough to stay on top of things, please sit back 
>quietly and remember that adage 'it's better to remain silent and be
>thought a wise man, thank to speak and remove all doubt whether you're
>a fool."

John, only you would take something I said which is a common figure of
speach and apparently take me literally. And then to use that assumption
to validate your implication that I am a fool.

On the other hand, if this were sarcasm and I failed to notice that, then
"Ha, Ha. Good one."

-- 
Zack Sessions
sessions@seq.uncwil.edu
University of North Carolina at Wilmington (Alumnus)
"Good health is merely the slowest form of dying."
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8779 alt.rush-limbaugh:9942 alt.politics.clinton:17400
From: jason@ab20.larc.nasa.gov (Jason Austin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: Rush lets something slip ...
Date: 18 Nov 92 09:27:52
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA
Distribution: world, na
	<1992Nov17.172306.7979@m5.harvard.edu>
	<1992Nov17.195540.10044@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
Reply-To: Jason C. Austin <j.c.austin@larc.nasa.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ab20.larc.nasa.gov
In-reply-to: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu's message of 17 Nov 92 19:55:40 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.195540.10044@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes:
-> Today, Rush was talking about Bo Snerdly's heritage, coming from the "African
-> Egyptian" culture.  As he was talking, he mentioned something about the
-> writing not surviving on "papayas".   A minute or two later he (or one of
-> his staff) caught himself and he corrected himself to "papayrus".  He then
-> started reminisicing about papaya, and the prevalence of papaya juice shops
-> on 8'th avenue, and how one young woman had told him that she would only
-> indulge in sex if she had papaya juice, becuase otherwise her blood would be
-> too acidic (or something like that).
-> 
-> Rush then said that "I have had girls say no for a lot of other reasons, but
-> this was the only time because of papaya juice."
-> 
-> Hmmm, Mr "Unmarried Sex is a Sin" just stated that he was soliciting sex
-> from 'girls',  and he also admitted that he wasn't having a lot of luck.
-> 
-> Maybe that is why he is so down on Kennedy's philandering?  Because Kennedy
-> is succesful while Rush is striking out?

	Can you post a time and date when he said he believed
unmarried sex is a sin?  I don't remember it.
--
Jason C. Austin
j.c.austin@larc.nasa.gov


Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8910 alt.rush-limbaugh:10103 alt.politics.clinton:17555
From: swb@marvin.ae.utexas.edu (Steve W Bova)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton
Subject: Re: Liberals DO oppose First Amendment rights
Date: 20 Nov 92 22:18:57 GMT
	<1992Nov13.203851.15344@EE.Stanford.EDU> <BxoBI8.39r@news.iastate.edu>
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization: CFD Lab, Dept ASE-EM, University of Texas at Austin
In-reply-to: barrett@iastate.edu's message of 13 Nov 92 21:25:17 GMT


   In article Mark  Sachs <MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

   >Perhaps my memory fails me, but I don't recall too many significant
   >instances of "liberals" fighting free speech, beyond a few trivial
   >and likely unconstitutional speech codes at universities, and a **JOKE**
   >posting proposing the rmgroup of alt.rush-limbaugh. In my experience
   >liberals have been quite forthright in defense of the First Amendment.
   >
   >Perhaps you can point out a few opposing examples for us?

Glad to.  I present the "MTV", "Pro-Choice Ticket":

This brings up an issue which, surprisingly enough, received extremely
little attention during the campaign.  The one organization which IMHO
has done more damage to our First Amendment rights over the last 10
years is the Parental Music Resource Center (PMRC).  This group was
*founded* by Tipper Gore in (I believe) 1986.  Among other activities,
the PMRC is responsible for the Parental Warning Labels which appear
on albums/cd's that have been deemed obscene.

The role the PMRC has played in wasting tax dollars and literally
destroying so called "porn rock" bands is deplorable.  For example,
the breakups of both Twisted Sister and the Dead Kennedys were
precipitated by their legal battles with the PMRC. You may remember the
Senate Hearings on Rock and Roll in which Frank Zappa John Denver, and
Dee Snyder testified.  These were called into session by none other
than Al Gore when he was head of the Senate Commerce Committee!!

So what, you say?  Less than 50 albums were stickered from 1986 to
1990.  Now they are extremely common.  Moreover, there have recently
been been cases in Florida and Texas where record store *owners* have
been arrested for "distributing obscene materials to minors" because
one of their clerks sold a stickered album to a minor.

Because of all this controversy, many store owners will not even carry
stickered or otherwise controversial albums.  For example, since
Ice-T's "Cop Killer" was banned, a record store here in Austin refuses
to carry Bob Marley or Eric Clapton albums featuring the song "I Shot
the Sherrif."

The power that Tipper Gore enjoyed as the wife of a senator from
Tennessee bodes very ill indeed for free speech now that she is to be
the wife of the Vice-President.


--
Steven W. Bova                   | 
swb@cfdlab.ae.utexas.edu         |
                                 | 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8877 alt.rush-limbaugh:10054
From: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch - Day 17
Date: 19 Nov 92 19:50:04 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

In article <1992Nov19.173738.1394@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:

>It's now 17 days after Bill Clinton's election and Rush is still on the 
>air with 536 radio affiliates and 207 TV affiliates, and his book is 
>number one on the NY Times hardback non-fiction best-seller lists.

It's now 17 days after G. Bush's rejection by a majority of the voters,
and Bill Clinton is still the President Elect, and Mr. Potatoe Head is 
still out of a job come January.

>-- 
>John Switzer               | "Lobbyists are circling Clinton like slugs
>                           | around a saucer of beer."
>CompuServe: 74076,1250     | -- Alexander Cockburn, LA Times 11/15/92
>Internet: jrs@netcom.com   | (P.S. Impeach Clinton, support the coup!)

Tom Perigrin                | "Limbots are sucking up to Rush like pimple
                            | faced adolescents around Madonna."
                            | (P.S. Impeach Switzer, support intelligent life!)
From: Andy.Soucy@f166.n363.z1.fidonet.org (Andy Soucy)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Here Are The Undeniable Truths of Life
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 00:23:00 PDT
Organization: FidoNet node 1:363/166

It appears to me that some of you missed the boat or fell off....
rush may appear to be one sided at times,,,,ok a lot of times,but 
all he is trying to do is to balance to scale (the liberal media 
scale) His point of his shows is to make us think for our selves
not believe the propaganda they want to believe.whether its rep.or 
dem. they want us to believe there side and not the other.
bulllllhocky I say .
the issue is , is it right or is it wrong .who will benifit.
Is it right to put thousands of people out of work and put them on 
welfare because of a bird or a fish that can relocate on their own.?
we all pay in the llong run.....
--  
        Andy Soucy  -  via FidoNet Node: 1:363/42
             UUCP:  -  ...tarpit!tous!business!166!Andy.Soucy
             ARPA:  -  Andy.Soucy@f166.n363.z1.fidonet.org
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: budd@playfair.Stanford.EDU (David Budd)
Subject: Re: Jobism
Organization: Stanford University
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 00:04:43 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.180340.11026@news.ysu.edu> ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) writes:
>
>In a previous article, scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn) says:
>

>
>>     (And if you'll permit me to indulge in some place-ism, I'd like to say
>>that there's something ironic about a person from the Youngstown, Ohio area
>>complaining about a lack of educated people in some other place or group.)
>
>Of course.  A city with university with a world-class engineering school, a 
>world class computer school, a world class liberal (I know, you HATE that word)
>arts college would be a place you would expect the bigest morons in the 
>country to come from.

I wouldn't belittle someone from such a place. Where is this place
you speak of, and have you ever visited?

>>
>>>*****************  James Trafficant for US Senate, 1998  *****************
>>
>>     I hope he gets the Democratic nomination. Even Buzz "I Didn't Know She Was
>>16" Lukens could wipe the floor with this guy.
>>
>
>Yeah.  Right.
>
>-- 
 Sadly, you are probably right. If John Glenn could win this year,
it is likely that Trafficant would win in 98. At least the
constituents where I live had the common sense to usher out
Mary Rose Oinkar.

I paraphrase Arlo Guthrie:

"So long, Mary, it's been good to know you.
"So long, tax and spend, it's been good to know you."
"You bounced cheques. It's been good to know you."
"I'm afraid that it's time that you head for the door."
--
David Leung-tak
"You can always tell a Harvard man. You just can't tell him very much."
"A day without sun is night."
From: larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: <None>
Date: 15 Nov 92 17:32:02 GMT
	<1992Nov12.092029.10605@hemlock.cray.com>
	<1992Nov12.181245.1@woods.ulowell.edu>
Organization: New Mexico State University, MetaPhysical Science Laboratory

In article <1992Nov12.181245.1@woods.ulowell.edu> enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
       [...]
   Bill CLINTON will go down as a man who thought he could please  all of
   the people all of the time while pleasingsome of teh people all of the
   time. People will be so pissed at him that when the Republican's get 
   elected in 1996 to a majority in the house and senate he'll problably 
   be impeached, for general stupidity.

   Robert R. Eno

Well, you might at least let the poor bastard assume the presidency before
you decide which promises he's broken, eh?

You folks are getting saliva all over everything.

L.
"Yeh, Buddy..            | larry@psl.nmsu.edu (Larry Cunningham)|  _~~_
 I've got your COMPUTER! | % Physical Science Laboratory        | (O)(-)
 Right HERE!!"           | New Mexico State University          |  /..\ 
 (computer THIS!)        | Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 88003    |   <> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are CORRECT, mine, and not PSLs or NMSUs..
Rush! to ignorance.
From: michael@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Michael of Nebadon)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Rush Exposed! (Was: thEwIndBag bashes Rev. Jackson, again)
Date: 24 Nov 92 02:48:46 GMT
Organization: The Great Beyond

In article <10094@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> joslin@pogo.isp.pitt.edu (David Joslin) writes:
>Vintage Rush.  He makes fun of Jackson's pronunciation (both when
>pronouncing "Cuomo" and when pronouncing "Reverend Jackson"), then
>denies that he is doing it, and then claims to be going out of his
>way to *avoid* making fun of Jackson.  
>
>Of course, every good Limbot knows that Rush was only joking, and
>that this is not an example of Rush hiding his nastiness behind
>empty disclaimers.

dido mode on {
 Gee. Good point! Here's another: Rush claims to stay stalwartly in
 the right, and yet I have videotape of his TV show where he walks
 TO THE LEFT part of his set. More vintage Rush, I'd say.

 Of course, every good Limbot knows that Rush was only physically
 moving around on his set and that this is not an example of Rush
 hiding his left-wing leanings behind empty disclaimers.
} dido mode off

Surely you had something more substantive than _that_ to object to
in that show. Either that or you're a pretty good Limbot,
yourself.  ;-)

michael@afterlife.ncsc.mil
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: meyerj@alleg.edu
Subject: Re: Rush Butchers Facts for his own Agenda
Organization: Allegheny College
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 01:11:29 GMT

In article <23NOV199209332064@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu>  
mitcheec@ctrvx1.vanderbilt.edu (Elliott Mitchell) writes:
> In article <1992Nov23.060812.13762@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>, 
> tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes...
> >With that in mind, what about the 13 million listeners Rush claims?
> >Well, first of all he admitted this last week that only 3 to 3.5  
million 
> 
> >...lets apply Llimbaugh math;
> > 
> >Of those 3 million probably 1/2 of them are ottid heads like myself.
> >Of the remaining 1.5 million, .5 million probably only listen because  
they
> >agree with a few things Rush says, and like the entertainment value.
> >So that leaves less that 1 million people who actually agree with
> >much of what he says...
> 
> Don't forget one of my favorite statistics:  More people voted for Perot
> than listen to thEwIndBag.
> 
> + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> | Elliott Mitchell
> |  Peabody College at Vanderbilt University
> |  Nashville, Tenn. Home of the Grand Ole Opry
> |  IN: mitcheec@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu | BN: MITCHEEC@VUCTRVAX

Don't forget Elliot, my favorite, more people voted for Michael Dukakis  
than did for Bill Clinton.

Jon Meyer
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:9014 alt.rush-limbaugh:10238
From: yeomans@luxor.ced.berkeley.edu (Gary Todd Yeomans)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Rush is RIGHT again
Date: 23 Nov 1992 02:04:34 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: luxor.ced.berkeley.edu

Rush was right about the UH-ReverUND JACKson-UH hiding in the wings for Clinton and the 
big pay-off for hiding during the campaign.  Did you people see that they had dinner and
Clinton went to one of Jackson's services where he called Clinton a "great healer"?

Here it comes, Jackson's going to be named to the Supreme Court or Minister of the Interior
or something.

Did you people see the love-fest with Clinton on Saturday Night Live about the Gays in the 
Military Skit.  Oh, man, did they lay in on thick.  "The greatest man of our Century..."???
Please spare me the manure.  This guy is no saviour and I bet he won't even repeal the ban
on homosexuals in the military.  

Todd Yeomans
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: kamilewi@lars.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Alex Kamilewicz)
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch Day 16
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 16:47:57 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.154421.7382@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>November 18, 1992
>Dateline - Santa Barbara, CA
>
>It's now 16 days after Bill Clinton's election and Rush is still on the 
>air with 532 radio affiliates and 207 TV affiliates.

I'm sorry John, did you have a point here?  Of course Rush is still going to
be popular, especially for the next four years since he is a member of the
loyal opposition, and democracies always need opposition so that those in
the majority can have their views challenged and possibly made to look at
these views and why they support them.  Rush will be around for a while, but
until he uses lots of unbaised facts and testimonies and the like, he will
be no more than a conservative demogogue, propped up by his own fallacies.

Alex

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%"Show me a young man who is a conservative,%
% and I'll show you a man with no heart,    % 
% show me an old man who is a liberal, and  %
% I'll show you a man with no brain."       %
%    <-- Winston Churchill                  %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller)
Subject: Re: Religious Right (was Re: Rush Limbaugh: Victory from Defeat)
Reply-To: ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller)
Organization: St. Elizabeth Hospital, Youngstown, OH
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 18:12:30 GMT


In a previous article, rickertj@athena.cas.vanderbilt.edu (John Rickert) says:

>
>   Oh, I get it now.  It took me long enough.  But I think I finally
>caught on.  Religious = religious right.  A public reference to religion
>is right-wing extremism.  Now I see...

Wrong.  The "Religious Right" is that body/school of thinking that insists
that one cannot be a good christian/other faith unless one holds certian
(usually right wing conservative) political beliefs, and also works to
get its interpretation of "Morality" legislated into law and classify those
who do not accept that interpretation as criminals and non-patriots.

In case there's any doubt, I refer to Pat Robertson and his followers,
Lou Mabon and his followers, Jerry Fallwell and his followers, and any other
religious body/person who follows such beliefs.


-- 
*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  /\/\   HATE IS NOT A  *         
*                    Kelley L. Miller  / /  \  FAMILY VALUE   *            
*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  / /____\                *  
*     GIGO: Gospel In--Garbage Out   /______\                 *
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
Subject: Re: Sniveling Whiny Conservatives
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: na
Date: 21 Nov 92 00:32:52 GMT

In <1992Nov20.162231.8472@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> scasburn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven M Casburn) writes:

>     "Sniveling Whiny Conservatives"...isn't that the followup to "Shiny Happy 
>People" that R.E.M. did on "Automatic for the People"? The one they said would 
>fit in more with the mood of the group? :-)

Yes, except conservatives never hold hands.  That's so faggy.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh