From: endevour@snoopy.umd.edu (endeavor)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.afghanistan,soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.arabic,soc.culture.iranian
Subject: Re: KABUL IS BURNING
Date: 14 Aug 92 06:23:24 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park

In article <l8lc4dINNf5a@pageboy.cs.utexas.edu> hyder@cs.utexas.edu (Syed Irfan Hyder) writes:
>In article <1992Aug13.042650.28356@wam.umd.edu> endevour@wam.umd.edu (...) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug11.191639@IASTATE.EDU> jakhan@IASTATE.EDU (Javed A Khan) writes:
>::
>::
>::I wonder what the champions of the ISLAMIC BROTHERHOOD on this net have to 
>::say about the carnage taking place on the streets of Kabul.
>::
> lines deleted


>The silence is not on indifference to the killings. But a wait
>on the correct version of the events to emerge.

The correct version of the events is imprinted on the charred bodies of
one thousand Muslim Afghan men, women and children who managed to survive
the atrocities of one hundred thousand soldiers of the Red Army, but could
not make it through the cross fire of the so called champions of the Islamic
brother hood. If you and your Brethren have no word of consolation to offer
for the suffering of the Afghan Nation, then please spare us your insolent 
remarks about the the various "versions" of the events. 


>Any one following
>the news events in the Western press after the fall of Najib
>(and even before it) knows their intentions. They want any thing
>but peace in that region.

Do please enlighten us with the true intention of the western press, those
insufferable war mongers ? :-)    


> Even the recent army operation in Pakistan
>has an Afghanistan twist. It is advised in Quran to first
>research the authenticity of the report before commenting on
>it. Afghanistan situation after Najibullah has been the
>test-bed of propoganda war par extreme by the Western
>press and counter propoganda.

I agree. Calling the proxy war fought by Gulbudin, Rabani, Sayaf and 
Wahdat as an ethnic struggle is one such good example.   


> To determine who killed whom
>and who started first is moot still. We must wait and see what
>is the correct situation.

You are absolutely right. It is quite difficult to say who is the 
real killer. Today the Afghan Nation is looking from Rabani to Gulbudin,
from Gulbudin to Sayaf, from Sayaf to Dostum, from Dostum to Haqani, 
from Haqani to Wahdat and from Wahdat back to Rabani in order to determine 
as to which of these are responsible for the Afghan killing. But, already,
it is hard to tell WHICH IS WHICH. 

>
>It must be pointed out that according to the accord signed by
>the President Rabbani and Hikmatyar, Doestam and his militia
>had to leave Kabul.


Even if such an accord had any binding or legitimacy what so ever, its
violation by Rabani, or for that purpose by anybody, do not justify Mr.
Gulbudin to shower 600 rockets/hour over the civilian population. 
Since you are so hot about accords, maybe you can discuss some moral
accords, such as, cold blooded murder of civilians is a crime against
humanity.  



> Before ignoring the millions killed and
>displaced in the 14 year war of independence, and expecting
>that the relatives of those millions were some robots who
>can be switched on and off as desired by the arm-chair
>commentators, is naivity par extreme.

Indeed and do specify who is this arm-chair commentator ?  

No, I think you want the BIG BROTHER of Hezbe-e-Islami, lately abrviated
as "HI" ( sounds like a Trojan Horse ), to be the one who turns the switches
on and off. OFF like the  one thousand such switches he recently turned off.





 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.afghanistan,soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.arabic,soc.culture.iranian