From: lpb@florida.swdc.stratus.com (Len Bucuvalas)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,ca.politics,ba.politics
Subject: Re: The Claytoon on the Couch (was Re: Stereotyping)
Date: 31 Aug 92 20:21:20 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc., San Jose, CA

In article <vydnjdl.phil@netcom.com> phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) writes:
>In article <8225.24802@stratus.SWDC.Stratus.COM> lpb@florida.swdc.stratus.com (Len Bucuvalas) writes:
>    >>If the system continually presents you with a choice of two
>    >>evils, the only morally legitimate option is to not make a
>    >>choice.
>    >>
>    >You must be blind.....there are more options than that! Just
>    >imagine...30% takes the Replicrat road....while the other 70%
>    >votes Libertarian or Populist.....can you imagine what would
>    >happen? And if the popular vote was broadcast for a
>    >Libertarian but a Democrat or Republican won....now that
>    >would expose the system for what it is.
>    >
>    >You and the rest of the 70% haven't got a clue do ya?! You
>    >are playing right into the Elite's hands...the hands of those
>    >who would convince you we have a bi-partisan system while
>    >both side spout the same nonsense and we the voters ignore
>    >all the other choices....
>
>Eh? Did you read what I posted? "If the system continually presents you with
>a choice of two evils, the only morally legitimate option is to not make 
>choice."= coward and cop out artist.

Yes Ronzone...I read it! Here's a question for you IF you can
handle it....who else is on as a presidential candidate??? Can
you answer Ronzone??? If you can't...then you should give up
your status as an adult and go back home to mommy!
>
>The system continually presents us with the choice between two evils.
Wrong again Ronzone...Populists, Libertarians, Green Party,
Independent...etc ......gooly gee Phil...I just answered the
above question...I guess we'll never know now if you still
qualify to be a rational and responsible adult in today's
society!
>
>Now, if tomorrow we could vote on PERMANENTLY removing political
>coercion, I might consider voting. But, voting as we have it today
>(political voting), is an inherently coercive act.
Of course....I agree that we should...and I'll spell it out
for you since you obviously dont have a clue....eliminate the
electorate college. But as we still have this...the only way
to change the system is to work within the system...or are you
still in the late 60s throwing around flowers for powers
instead of responsibly choosing those who seem to want to
represent your interests and constantly monitoring their
work?
>
>But then again, very few people really think about the morality of their
>actions.
Oh my...LISTEN UP GOD!!! Here we have one of those "greater
than thou" attitudes...get a clue....get a life...get lost!
>
>
>
>-- 
>phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone)
>
>"I can't get no satisfaction ...", M. Jagger
>"Yeah, right, tell me another one Mick.", P. Ronzone
>
>These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em!  (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)

I keep trying to tell you NOONE wants your opinions...but
you're not listening again!

Len

DISCLAIMER: My opinions...not my employer's OR Ronzone's!

--
*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
The accountability of government has gone to the point where the very
use of the law is the instrument of illegality.
		-- Ralph Nader @ Harvard Law School, 1/15/92