HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jialin@dogwood.botany.uga.edu (Jialin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: "Revolutionary Modern Beijing Opera" Songs Available for FTP
Keywords: Li Tie-Mei and Yang Zi-Rong
Date: 8 Apr 92 19:46:04 GMT
Organization: Botany Department - U of Georgia, Athens

In article <1992Apr6.182737.904@sunova.ssc.gov> xiaoyu@grumpy.SSC.GOV (Xiaoyu Li) writes:
>
>Hi, guys! Here is something that fits the "Culture"
>category of this newsgroup. :-)  If, and only if :-)

I just played the Yang Zirong, and it scared the hell out
the students in the hallway. 

                      /|  0      \\    -  _            
           --- ----~ | --------- |  ---)    ;_\__     
    _ )~   /---\     |          / _____     ( ___)    
   (_|____||(O) \____|_________/_/|(O) \_______/=o     z forever  71' 83'
   _ ______\___/__________________\___/____________~~______________________

"Li Peng is certainly better educated than the old generation.." - Li Xiaolin

"The table in front of a classroom in Peking University is also well 
 educated. "                                                     - Xi Chen
From: tcheung@ramius.ocf.llnl.gov
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Train from Shanghai to Nanjing
Date: 16 Apr 92 01:01:48 GMT
Organization: University of California, Davis / LLNL

In article <1992Apr16.003601.3444@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> txt15@po.CWRU.Edu (Tao Tao) writes:
->
->This is not true.  There are bus and cab, if you willing to pay for the
->expensive cab, to Nanjing from Shanghai.  The best way to me is the 
->Express 92, which leaves for Nanjing around noon and get you to Nanjing
->non-stop in avbout 4 hours.
->
->This should be useful I hope.
->
->Tao

How much does it cost for a cab one way?  How much does it cost for
the cab to stay say 2 days in Nanjing and then back?
--
Terry Cheung
tcheung@ramius.ocf.llnl.gov
From: yding@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Yijun Ding)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: *IMPORTANT* please consider
Keywords: flame
Date: 10 Apr 92 13:36:19 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Apr10.073211.14930@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> hyx1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Harry Y Xu) writes:
>
>	I see too much garbage worthless stuff floating around here.
>I believe the purpose of this group is to provide for exchange of valuable
>information and ideas.

Isn't that obvious ;-) ?

>	We should be rid of unimformative inputs which waste our valuable 
>time and energy.

Oh oh, bad suggestions.

>	I suggest that all of us should post only FACTS, legitimate CONCERNS,
>and OPINIONS accompanyed by supporting FACTS.

Yes. And I would like to see more people post their own experience.

-- 
/* Yijun Ding, Pittsburgh PA.  412-624-0134
/* open your window and get something fresh */
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li)
Subject: Source of information.
Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington IN.
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 15:28:08 -0500


We have intention for this news. If it is untrue, it is your
responsibility to verify it. The following is what I received.
No flame please!

Xiao Li


From binbin@cici.unh.edu Wed Apr  8 10:48:36 1992
Received: from unh.edu (nic.unh.edu) by silver.ucs.indiana.edu
	(5.65c+/10jsm) id AA10151; Wed, 8 Apr 1992 10:48:33 -0500
Received: from cici.unh.edu by unh.edu with SMTP id AA04403
  (5.65c+/IDA-1.4.4 for <xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu>); Wed, 8 Apr 1992 11:48:30 -0400
Received: from blackbird.unh.edu by cici.unh.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA03299; Wed, 8 Apr 92 11:52:24 EDT
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 92 11:52:24 EDT
From: binbin@cici.unh.edu (Bin-Bin Ding)
Message-Id: <9204081552.AA03299@cici.unh.edu>
To: xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu
Subject: Re: Chinese Nationals Came Before 4/1/90 Will Have Greencard.
Status: RO


HI Mr/Ms Li;

I called the Senate about that bill.  If I got all the correct information, 
the bill is passed and is Public Law #101-649. Thank you for letting us know.

Bin-Bin Ding
University of New Hampshire

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: srzhang@mth.msu.edu (Shuren Zhang)
Subject: Re: Chinese Nationals Came Before 4/1/90 Will Have Greencard.
Organization: Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 19:10:50 GMT

In article <zhu.702845436@square-crk> zhu@cs.UAlberta.CA (Zhu Yuchen) writes:
>How many of you came to the States before 4/1/90 and how many after.
>
>Nobody came here after the dealine would say that big "OUTSTANDING",
>besides, they don't have rights to vote Bush in Nov. 
>
>The bill is sure a good news for most of Chinese people down there.
>But for those who came after 4/1/90, it will put them in a more
>difficult situation, for example. when both kinds of people go out
>for a job interview, it will put more weight on the first kind because
>of visa status. Unfair competition.
>
>Scott's 89-day theory at least sounds reasonable to me. If American
>government wants to keep all the Chinese talents here, 

  The U.S. government wants anyone from any country who can do good to
stay not all the Chinese students.  Some Chinese students just want to
stay in any case and can have beautiful pretense.

>please use
>better pretense, more-than-90-days-will-be-persecuted? give me a break.
>If they had said that China's human rights situation has not improved
>since 6/4/89, and Chinese nationals cannot do any good to us if they go
>back, so we'd better keep them here,  it would be more acceptable to me.
>
>=zyc fm: Canada.
>
>--
>|- Zhu, Yuchen              ||    Dept. of Computing Science -|
>|- (403) 420-1273(h)        ||    806, General Services Bldg.-|
>|- (403) 492-3977(o)        ||    Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton -|
>|- Email: zhu@cs.ualberta.ca||    Canada  T6G 2H1            -|
From: IO01282@MAINE.MAINE.EDU
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: looking for friend--Ms. Xu Jie
Date: 5 Apr 92 02:44:41 GMT
Organization: University of Maine System

I am looking for my friend Xu Jie.  She transfered from University of Maine
to New York University, Buffalo last Fall.  If some one knew her address,
please let me know, and tell her I am looking for her.


Thank you.

Shiying Law

e-mail: io01282@maine.maine.edu
        slaw@watson.eece.maine.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: kai@IASTATE.EDU (Kai Sun)
Subject: Re: Info on small private business in China
Reply-To: kai@IASTATE.EDU (Kai Sun)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 04:16:25 GMT

In article <009590EA.6CEE6EC0@BAEPV2.NCSU.EDU>, wang@BAEPV2.NCSU.EDU writes:
> >  I am tentitively forming a idea of running a small(very small) 
> >business in China. Specially, my idea is that I invest the money, and my
> >brothers in my hometown area act as business managers. And then we hire
> >one or two people as workers.
> >  I will appriciate your remarks on the following matters. This could help me
> >make up or reshape my final decision.  I hope this is not a misuse of the
net. 
> >It is a topic well worth discussion.
> >	Issues:
> >	  Is this just fissible?
> >	  government rules on renting a house or site;
> 
>           No rule 
> 
> >	  government rules on tax;
> 
>           Goverment will go to your home to grab tax.
>  
> >	  government attitude toward me (J-1 to F1, no political backdoor
> >	    relations)
> 
>           You are a bad guy

   Probably you are right for a larger part. I don't expect the goverment to
give me all green lights.  But before I do it, I need to access the situration
to be prepared to the best.

> 
> ...
> 
> >	  where do I go to get permission, what is the processure;
> 
>           Bring three bottles of Maotai and a set of color TV  or $500 to 
> the people in Industrial & Commerical Administration to get permission.  
> 

   I am sure it will be very helpful.  But my personality allows me to throw
the Maotais into sea rather than brible government officials.  Brible will just
spoil them in the long run and will my life not free of nonsense obligation.
--
*******************************************************************
* In business, customers gain;      |   kai@iastate.edu           *
* in war, all sides lose.           |   N1.Kai@isumvs.iastate.edu *
*******************************************************************
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne)
Subject: Re: Chinese Nationals Came Before 4/1/90 Will Have Greencard.
Organization: Computer "Science" Dept, Yale University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 23:27:15 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.184855.25476@daffy.cs.wisc.edu>, kniaz@cat1.cs.wisc.edu (Joel Kniaz) writes:
<In article <1992Apr9.200447.18102@cs.yale.edu> horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes:
<>In article <1992Apr9.173206.8674@u.washington.edu>, liao@milton.u.washington.edu (shiquan liao) writes:
<><
<><Not many people are saying that they will be arrested or harassed if they
<><return, however,
<>
<>Not true.  Just ask any INS (Immigration and Naturalisation Service) officer.
<
<	If the poster has this fear, then who are you to deny its legitimacy
<	for him/her or for anyone?

I'm not talking about the legitimacy of the fear (though I don't think many
FGNCZ actually "fear" what they claim to), but the legitimacy of the claims.
99.99% of the CSS in the US would face no harassment whatsoever upon returning
to China.  (Plenty of them return for visits, then come back and claim to be
in danger of harassment!!!  Come ON!)

<>What matters here is $$$$$$$, not freedom.  There's not necessarily anything
<>wrong with that, but there is something wrong with lying about it.
<
<	Again, you are implying that all those who wish to remain here
<	for political reasons are lying.

Damn right.  And quite a few Chinese netters have backed up my statements.

[About lying:]
<       Some may be.  Some may not.
<	So what?  

I thought you were the religious one here.  Better go reread your Ten
Commandments--in Exodus, I think.

<	To even try to compare the executive powers of the American presidency
<	with those of the Chinese Premiership is a ridiculous idea.  The checks 
<	and balances that exist between the branches of the U.S. Government, while
<	skewed at this time toward the executive, make your implication completely
<	baseless.

What do you know about the structure of the Chinese government?!  Don't start
talking about checks and balances unless you can present some solid knowledge.

<	If they have lived in China 
<	and in the United States,  who are you to question their ability to
<	make their own evaluations?

That question is simply designed to pree"mpt anything I say.

<       Are they all lying,

No, only the FGNCZ are lying.

<	Does your obviously 
<	negative impression of U.S. politics make you any more capable of
<	determining how happy they have actually been living here?

I'm sure many of them are quite happy here.  (Though actually many are very
unhappy.  You should be able to understand why.)  That has nothing to do
with the discussion, though.

					--Scott

-- 
Scott Horne                               ...!{harvard,cmcl2,decvax}!yale!horne
horne@cs.Yale.edu      SnailMail:  Box 7196 Yale Station, New Haven, CT   06520
203 436-1848                Residence:  Rm 1848 Silliman College, New Haven, CT
ZANG4 HAN4 YI4 JIA1 / GONG4 JIAN4 ZHONG1HUA2!
From: dhsy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse (Re: 6.4, green card, freedom...)
Date: 13 Apr 92 22:21:02 EDT
Distribution: soc
Organization: Cornell University

yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes: 
>
>+horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes: 
>+> yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
>+> <1. India and Mexico have more "freedoms" than China, why didn't they
>+> <   go there?
>+> 
>+> Very good point.  I ran a little experiment a few years ago by asking these
>+> FGNCZ whether they'd go to Bangladesh if no other country would offer them
>+> "protection".  The results?  Not one was willing to go to Bangladesh.
>+> Interesting, isn't it?  I'd go anywhere if my life were truly in danger.
>+
>+But you won't go a more dangerous place.  People have some impression that
>
>	Good statement!  In Jun 4 1989, TAM was a dangerous place, why did they
>	go?

They DID NOT expect they are going to be killed !!!

>+You can't put freedom and money separately.  Both are goals of people's
>+dreams of life.
> 
> 	If you are right, then, why should CCP give freedom to those
> 	who owe CCP money and are not willing to return?

Who give who freedom?

> 	Since they are making this type of choice, why should they label
> 	themselves as democrazy fighters?

Who label who "democrazy fighters" ???

>+> <3. maybe CCP owe your parents something, but that's the deal between
>+> <   CCP and your parents.  The issue is: did YOU return what you owe
>+> <   to CCP as yet?
>+> 
>+> Good question, Shannon.  But you have to get even more basic than that.
>+> Past discussions on SCC have revealed that many SCCers *deny* owing anything
>+> to the CCP or their _tong2bao1men_ in China.
>+
>+The point is that your parents have this God-blessed RESPONSIBLITY to raise
>+kids, and don't expect them to return.  That is why the kids don't owe thier
>+parents who in turn paid IN FULL and probably are STILL PAYING their kids'
>+educational cost and other misc cost to their "_tong2bao1men_" or CCP or
>+whoever you'd like to designate.
>
>	So, you are still in the traditional family-oriented business--
>	"CCP owe my father money, therefore, i will not return what I owe
>	to CCP". 

Suppose you paid 15 thousand dollars a year for your kid to go to Yale, then
he graduated, then he gord back to China to work, then he gets a letter from
the president of Yale saying that "You owe us 60 thousand dollars, you haven't
paid it back yet, we owe your father money, but you owe us" !!!

That's good mathematics though, you subtract what's paid first.  :-)

>+> <4. China become democratic first, or you go home to join the construction
>+> <   of a democratic system for China first?
>+> 
>+> Or would they stay here no matter what the political situation in China?
>+
>+That's why there are many people RETURNED to China in the 50s.  Is there
>+a call for "the construction of a democratic system for China" now??? !!!
>
>	I have called for several times.
>
> shannon
> -------

:-) :-) :-)

You see, you can't "call for" it when you are here.

dhsy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
From: s9874203@titan.ucc.umass.edu (s9874203)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Relax, folks...
Date: 17 Apr 92 19:45:24 GMT
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

In article <1992Apr17.171635.19926@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> be549@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robin Coose) writes:
>
>I am just wondering why there are some many SSC interested in
>politics.  After look through these posters, make me remind some-
>thing in the Cul-Revolution.  Some of them are anxious to arguing
>about the something stupid.  I mean, is there anything else we
>can talk about in this newsgroup, besides the 6.4, CCP stuff?
>Just a suggestion.  I do wanna see more topics in this group.
>                                          Robin Wang

So do I. Maybe we can create a newsgroup like
soc.culture.china.politics. 

--Yang
From: wu@walt.tmc.edu (Donghua Wu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: What's the CAAC stand for? (Re: Train from Shanghai to Nanjing
Date: 17 Apr 92 08:47:38 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Dept., Mississippi State University

In article <wangf.703489019@chilko.ucs.ubc.ca> wangf@unixg.ubc.ca (Frank Wang) writes:
>AS the title says.

Chinese Aviation Airlines Company :-|
	Chinese Airlines Always Canceled :-)
	Chinese Airlines Always(Almost) Crashes :-)
	Choose Another Airlines Company :-)
--
Donghua Wu					wu@cs.msstate.edu
Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:12848 soc.culture.taiwan:7376 soc.culture.hongkong:5667
From: liuc@madrone.eecs.ucdavis.edu (Chia-Liang Liu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Re: When is Qing1 Ming2?
Date: 13 Apr 92 18:09:05 GMT
Followup-To: soc.culture.china
Organization: U.C. Davis - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

In article <wangf.703124247@kynok.ucs.ubc.ca> wangf@unixg.ubc.ca (Frank Wang) writes:
>
>Thanks a lot!  Now, the fool has more q's.  I thought Yin1 li4 is 
>lunar canlender (actually, a net pointed two weeks ago the yin li---
>Chinese calender is neither lunar nor solar calender) and yang2 li4 is
>solar calender.  Now, forget the terms lunar or solar, the yin1 li4 and
>yang2 li4 really confuse me.  I don't understand why Jan. 1 in yin li 
>varies a lot in yang li but qin ming counted from yin li does no change
>in yang li unless in leap year. 
>
Technically speaking, Yang-Li means solar calendar and Yin-Li means
lunar calendar because T'ai-Yang is the Sun and T'ai Yin is the Moon.
My personal opinion is that the Old Calendar (Chiu-Li or Jiu-Li)
should be called Hsia-Li (Xia-Li) because it uses both solar and
lunar. Even Nung-li (Nong-Li) is not good enough. As pointed by
Mr. Lin Wei, 24 Chieh-Ch'i (Jie-Qi) is more important for farmers.
However now most Chinese people (Hua-Jen or Hua-Ren) think Hsia- 
(Xia-) Li is Yin-Li or Nung- (Nong-) Li. As long as you understand
that ancient Chinese are so smart to use both sun and moon to make
calendar, it doesn't matter which term you use.



-- 
Ka-Leung Lau ( Chia-Liang Liu )
Digital Communications Research Laboratory
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 
University of California, Davis (Cal Aggies)
From: xu@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu (Hao Xu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Russkij jazyk (Re: Xue2xi2 Li3 Peng2, hao3 bang3yang4?  : -)  (Re: Li Peng getting a sense of humor.))
Date: 7 Apr 92 05:23:19 GMT
Reply-To: xu@toadflax.UUCP (Hao Xu)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis

In article <1992Apr6.221625.29077@cs.yale.edu> horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes:
>In article <1992Apr6.213925.5745@acsu.buffalo.edu>, xiaofei@acsu.buffalo.edu (XiaoFei Wang) writes:
><
><SCCers should not feel ashamed for not being able to speak Russian.
><Scott Horne can not speak it either. 

Nice point. However, even if Scott can speak Russian, no one should fell
ashamed for unable to do so. Everyone has some merit others don't have.

>Ty ne prav, Shiao-Fej.  Ja govorju po-russki, a ne tak khorosho.
>					--Scott (Vstavaj, prokljat'ej
>					  zaklejmjonnyy....)

Isn't this behavior childish?

Hao
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne)
Subject: Re: Chinese Nationals Came Before 4/1/90 Will Have Greencard.
Organization: Computer "Science" Dept, Yale University
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 18:37:48 GMT

In article <ROTEN.92Apr8135901@CUBA.gsfc.nasa.gov>, roten@CUBA.gsfc.nasa.gov (Charles Roten) writes:
<In article <1992Apr7.212854.18161@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
<xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
<
<   This bill will become effective if President Bush cannot
<   provide evidence that these Chinese nationals will not be
<   persecuted upon returning to their motherland.
[...]
<   Chinese nationals who are eligible to apply green card must
[...]
<   (2). Have not stayed in China for more than 90 days during the time;
[rest deleted]

<I have only one comment and one feeling about this move by Congress ..
<
< OOOO  UU  UU TTTTTT  SSSS  TTTTTT   AA    NN   NN DDDDD  II NN   NN  GGGG  
<OO  OO UU  UU   TT   SS  SS   TT    AAAA   NNN  NN DD  DD II NNN  NN GG  GG
<OO  OO UU  UU   TT    SS      TT   AA  AA  NNNN NN DD  DD II NNNN NN GG     
<OO  OO UU  UU   TT      SS    TT   AAAAAA  NN NNNN DD  DD II NN NNNN GG GGG 
<OO  OO UU  UU   TT   SS  SS   TT  AA    AA NN  NNN DD  DD II NN  NNN GG  GG
< OOOO   UUUU    TT    SSSS    TT  AA    AA NN   NN DDDDD  II NN   NN  GGGG



ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Read what I've outlined above.  "I had to leave China on my eighty-ninth day
because I thought I'd be persecuted"?!?!?!?  God be damned, what a load of
hypocrisy!!!

					--Scott

-- 
Scott Horne                               ...!{harvard,cmcl2,decvax}!yale!horne
horne@cs.Yale.edu      SnailMail:  Box 7196 Yale Station, New Haven, CT   06520
203 436-1848                Residence:  Rm 1848 Silliman College, New Haven, CT
ZANG4 HAN4 YI4 JIA1 / GONG4 JIAN4 ZHONG1HUA2!
From: zhuh@athena.mit.edu (Hui Zhu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: It Is Time To Defend Li Peng, China's Hardworking Premire.
Date: 8 Apr 92 01:01:09 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In article <1992Apr7.112848.1471@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>, xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
|> 
|> I have attacked Li Peng for a long period of time since 6/4.
|> Now I think it is wrong. It was DXP who committed the 6/4
|> massacre. People should be aware of it.
|> 
|> 
|> Xiao Li
|> 

Exactly! Xiao Li(Li, Jr).  It IS Deng who committed the 6/4, not Li, Sr. :)

But I still have a question:  Is this story, which should be told to you by
your father, told on March 31 or April 1?   He maybe kidding you too.  :)
From: joe@astro.as.utexas.edu (Joe Wang)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Police Open Fire on Protest
Date: 26 Mar 92 08:34:21 GMT
Organization: McDonald Observatory, University of Texas @ Austin

Opening fire on a peaceful protest is STUPID.  People demonstrate
because they are upset, and if you prevent them from expressing their
anger, you will get them more angry, and eventually no amount of force
will stop them.

I fear that the PRC is following the same policies which led Great
Britain to the mess in Ireland.  If this is the case, then what will
happen is that there will be an escalating spiral of violence, leading
to a situation in which everyone loses.


Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: xiong@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Bo Xiong)
Subject: Re: Flood Donation (Re: IFCSS NR3073:  IFCSS Summer Workshop on Biz..)
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 21:04:27 -0500

In article <1992Apr13.135910.10797@cs.yale.edu> horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU 
(Scott Horne) writes:
>In article <204824@unix.cis.pitt.edu>, yding@unix.cis.pitt.edu 
>(Yijun Ding) writes:
><
><Sometimes, I wonder if 
><there are two Bo Xiong on the net. One who is very resourceful and one who 
><nasty...

I knew the SCC Donkey would follow up this so I didn't bother to respond
to you, after all, you are not the SCC Donkey :-)

>No.  Unfortunately, we have only the nasty one.
>
>					--Scott

Yes, to *SOME OF YOU*, it's unfortunate :-)  And, it would be more 
unfortunate if your Donkey Rider is pulled out and shown on SCC again, 
since he is still on your back (there are at least five active SCCers 
can solve the "mystery" about your Donkey Rider :-)

Ask your Donkey Rider for permission first next time before you jump up :-) 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bo Xiong in Chicago
From: SJWang@PHILOS.umass.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: President of IFCSS Visits UMass
Date: 17 Apr 92 02:31:59 GMT


Dear ANetters:ellows at UMass:

IFCSS President Zhao Haiqing visited UMass/Amherst campus and delivered a speech
of situation IFCSS and the immigration bill fo CSS at the Capitalhill on Apr. 14
He wintroduced the ey points in the bills, core elements to influence those
senators and congressmen, our stratigy to lobby, our work to cooperate with
the lobby team, and sall consideration for IFCSS to do this bill for CSS in USA
He also called for any kind of opinions, suggestions of IFCSS' work and hop CSS
continue to support IFCSS' work. He answered all questiones asked by CSS at
the meeting. Mr. Gao Hong, Chief-stuff of IFCSS HQ came with Haiqing and made
an introduction of IFCSS insurrance program there.At the meeting CSSA at UMass/
Amherst started a compaign to collect signatures on the letters for the bill and
to collect donation for lobby work.
4/12/1992
CSSA/UMass/Amherst
Apr. 16, 1992SAGE **