HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: flavio@cflav.sublink.org (Flavio Casetta)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
Subject: Re: Utility: applylist
Date: 22 Dec 92 16:59:35 GMT
Organization: Flavio Casetta, Reg'd HP ISV & OEM of handheld computers.

Excerpted from Klaus Kalb article...

> There is one thing I always missed from UserRPL: The possiblity to 
> iterate a program over all entries in  a list.
> Something like
>   FOR obj IN list DO ... END
> would sometimes be handy. So I wrote a utility the offers a workaround.
> 
> APPLYLIST takes to arguments:
>  A list in level 2, lets assume it's L = { O1 O2 ... On }
>  Anything in level 1, lets call this P
>  and it does
> - Bind L,P and the current depth to local vars (unnamed ones)
> - Push O1 to the stack, execute P
> - Push O2 to the stack, execute P
>  ...
> - Push On to the stack, execute P
> - Make all new objects on the stack into a list
>
> Examples:
> 
> --- Double all numbers in a list
> { 1 2 3 } 
> \<< 2 * \>> 
> APPLYLIST  --> { 2 4 6 }
>
> --- Double all numbers in a list, in a somewhat different sense
> { 1 2 3 } 
> \<< DUP \>> 
> APPLYLIST  --> { 1 1 2 2 3 3 }
>
> --- Delete all zeros from a list
> { 0 1 2 0 3 4 }
> \<< IF DUP 0 SAME THEN DROP END \>> 
> APPLYLIST  --> { 1 2 3 4 }
> 
> --- Add up all numbers in the list
> 0
> { 1 2 3 4 }
> \<< + \>>
> APPLYLIST   --> 10 { }
>
> --- Find the amount of mem used in port 0
> 0 DUP PVARS DROP \<< RCL BYTES SWAP DROP + \>> APPLYLIST DROP 
>
> ---     Recall all vars to the stack and tag them with their name:
> VARS \<< DUP RCL SWAP \->TAG \>> APPLYLIST DROP
>


The SmartROM contains this keyword, named LOP1, (and many variations on the 
theme as well LOPN, METOP, RPT) since early 1991.


Bye,

Flavio
__
* flavio@cflav.sublink.org (Flavio Casetta)
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| The usual disclaimer does not apply      |   +59 440404 (Vox populi) |
| ForCALC's opinions are necessarily mine  |   +59 304490 (Fax dei)    |
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
From: kolstad@cae.wisc.edu (Joel Kolstad)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
Subject: Re: Using programmable calcs in exams
Date: 21 Dec 92 19:28:29 GMT
Organization: College of Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin--Madison

In article <6869@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca> jorchard@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Jeff Orchard) writes:
>I don't see why some people think they are being "punished" when they are
>told that they can't use their programable calculators during exams.

I don't think anyone's complaining that they're being punished.  They're
just complaining that the reasons behind banning calculators tend to be
rather short-sighted.

>Shouldn't that just put everyone on the SAME grounds?

Perhaps... but why in the world should everyone be FORCED to be put on the
SAME ground?  

As someone else mentioned, even "premium" calculators such as HP-48SX's
as not that expensive when amortized over a four year or more college
education.  If you didn't spend $300 on a calculator, perhaps you spent it on a
stereo, and that was your choice.

>  It is not a
>disadvantage to not be allowed to use high-powered calculators... but it
>is an advantage to be allowed to use them.

In the strictest sense, no, it's not a disadvantage.  Don't you think that
it's _OK_ to be allowed to have the advantages that calculators give you on
an exam though?  I don't mean using a calculator for crib notes, I mean
using one to solve, say, simultaneous equations faster that you can do it
by hand.  Since exams are of finite length, I'd much rather have extra time
to work out the symbolic solutions to problems, rather than spend time on
doing number crunching.  If some other person doesn't have a calculator
that can solve simultaneous equations -- that's his problem.  You can't
force people's brains to work at the same level as one another's, you
shouldn't force people to use (or not to use) the same tools as one another.

If you take the point of view that college is supposed to prepare you for
the "real world," your employeers is going to be GLAD that you're saving
time by using a calculator.

>The Math faculty at University of Waterloo has figured it out now.  The
>only exams that I don't use my calculator in is in my math exams!  :-)

If your math exams are designed well, it won't matter whether or not you
have a calculator with you.  (Asking a question like, "What is d(x^2)/dx?"
is sort of silly.  Asking "Show, by using the definition of a derivative,
that d(x^n)/dx=n*x^(n-1)" is a much better question.)

						---Joel Kolstad
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
From: safley@stsci.edu
Subject: Re: The "high price" of the HP48!
Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute
Distribution: usa,na
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 00:55:47 GMT

In article <PHR.92Dec31210815@napa.telebit.com>, phr@telebit.com (Paul Rubin) writes:> In article <1992Dec31.180319.8567@doug.cae.wisc.edu> kolstad@cae.wisc.edu (Joel Kolstad) writes:
> 
>    Letsee... a HP-48 is $275.  Let's say you're making $4 an hour take home
>    pay... that's 70 hours of work for the 48.  I think my 48 has saved _me_ 70
>    hours of work over the past three years, and I think they can for other
>    people as well.
> 
> Please explain how these 70 hours were saved.  Make it just 60 hours,
> since you can get a decent low-end programmable calculator for around
> $40 (HP-10S, I think, but I haven't kept track of these models recently)
> and it is the difference between that kind of calculator and the 48
> that you need to justify.
> 
> I have a 42s which has probably saved me a few hours over a
> nonprogrammable, but I don't think a 48 would have saved me 60 minutes
> over the 42s, much less 60 hours.  I also suspect that the few hours
> the 42s has saved me was more than offset by the extra hours it took
> me to study how to use and program it, unlike a borrowed $60 Casio
> that I had for a while which was programmable in BASIC and barely even
> needed a manual.
> 

Okay Paul, although this wasn't directed to me, I can personally tell you how 
owning a 48SX has saved me LOTS & LOTS of hours over my previous 28S (and my 
15C, and my 33E that didn't even have continuous memory!).  If my battery dies,
or I do something really stupid like resetting memory and not trying to recover
memory, I simply hook up my 48 to my computer (yes, I too agree that computers
are a marvelous tool capable of more than the 48) and do in approximately 3
minutes what used to take literally hours to do. I have a total of about 96k
in my 48 and thats a whole lot of keystrokes.

As far as things I can do with my 48 (ie problems that make it nice -note I 
didn't say necessary) I've saved lots and lots of time doing such things as 
solving differential equations numerically, which programs are freely available
on the net to do, and checking timing for parts of the command load that goes 
to the Hubble Space Telescope. I have plans for my 48 to make it an invaluable 
tool for an amatuer astronomer, sitting under a dark sky and wondering what 
the epoch 2000 coordinates of a star are, since he has it listed as epoch 1950,
and his reference book is sitting on his desk miles away. There are unlimited 
possibilities for the 48. You just have to expand your horizons.

And I agree with you that the average student doesn't need a 48, or maybe even
a 42, that a computer will come in much more handy for such people. And I 
wouldn't dream of owning a 48 without a computer, cause you'd have to type in
everything by hand (ughh).  But I wouldn't dream of just settling for being 
an average student either.

William Safley
CSC/Space Telescope Science Institute

Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
From: sweet@ug.cs.dal.ca (garth r sweet)
Subject: Engraving an HP48
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 18:52:20 GMT


	I recently tried to get my name and SIN number engraved on my HP48
figuring to make it at least slightly more secure, but when I tried the
key houses and engraving shops kept turning me away, saving that most
plastics will melt when they try to engrave it, hence they won't even try.
Has anyone else had this problem? How do you mark your calculators, or do
you, I figure most people are like me in that after they shell hundreds
of dollars for these supper calcs, they like to put thier name on them.
Maybe I just have to find the right shop.

+---------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+
+ name : Garth Sweet        +            Ultra-Mini HP 48 FAQ                 +
+ email: sweet@ug.cs.dal.ca +                                                 +
+ phone: 902-865-8987       +     FAQ = (F)requently (A)sked (Q)uestions      +
+---------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+
+ Q: Where can I get HP 48 stuff?  A: EduCalc 1-800-535-9650 24hrs (Can/USA)  +
+ Q: Where can I ftp HP 48 files?  A: seq.uncwil.edu has a ton of stuff       +
+ Q: How do I get files to my HP?  A: You need a cable, check real FAQ        +
+ Q: Where is the real FAQ?        A: At seq.uncwil.edu of course!	      +
+ Q: What's FTP anyway?            A: Mail me!	                              +
+ Q: How do I get help on my HP?   A: Post questions. We don't bite. *SMILE*  +
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
From: ramos@engr.LaTech.edu (Alex Ramos)
Subject: Who has the cheapest 128K ?
Organization: Louisiana Tech University
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 01:53:00 GMT

Does EduCalc have the lowest-priced 128k expansion card for the 48SX ?

If you know of some person or business who has a 128K for less then $85.00
(even if it is USED), please let me know!

Thanks in advance.

--

/* ramos@engr.Latech.edu                     
                                            
                Fala-se Portugues, tche!     
		English spoken here.
*/ 

From: akcs.ejf@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com (Ed Fasula)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 22:40:02 GMT
Subject: Re: 256k & 512k RAM cards
Message-ID: <2b3f7738.2524.1comp.sys.hp48.1@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48

I have a 512k card (about $300).  These are 4 bank cards, so you can only
have 128k availible at a time (usually independent memory).  They are
also a bit fragile, you can't let the batteries die and I hear the
read/write switch wears-out.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
From: kolstad@cae.wisc.edu (Joel Kolstad)
Subject: Re: The "high price" of the HP48!
Organization: U of Wisconsin-Madison College of Engineering
Date: 26 Dec 92 05:36:24 CST

In article <PHR.92Dec25160413@napa.telebit.com> phr@telebit.com (Paul Rubin) writes:
>    True, but you can't stop an idea whose time has come.  Before you know
>    it, programmable calculators will be de rigueur in all curricula, and
>    the hot new debate will be whether to allow handheld interactive
>    satellite video in the classroom.
>
>I can't understand this.  Programmable calculators a la the HP48 are a
>gross kludge, something better than a nonprogrammable calculator
>that is useful when a real computer is not available.
>
>Real computers being de rigeur in all curricula, I could understand.
>But why would, say, a literature student want an HP48?

Paul,

	Have you ever used a HP-48?  They're far from a "gross kludge."
Given a choice between a HP-95LX and a HP-48SX for doing math work, I would
pick a HP-48 much of the time.  Consider that the software for the HP-48
has been specifically designed for doing math/engineering/science work,
whereas the program you run on your PC is running on the same machine that
was designed to play Lemmings.  In this light, it looks more like the PCs
are kludges...

	Of course, there are places for both in this world.  For research
use, PCs running Mathematica are better.  For doing normal classwork (in
class), HP-48's are better.  A HP-95 running, say, Derive fits into the
above scheme somewhere, but I still wouldn't want to only be able to use a
HP-95 and not a HP-48.

						---Joel Kolstad
From: akcs.n2kyw@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com (Paul Smith)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 03:40:03 GMT
Subject: Re: Radio for HP48sx
Message-ID: <2b37dcc0.2406.8comp.sys.hp48.1@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48

With respect to transmitting hp48 data via radio:

1.  Legality: I have an amateur radio op's licence (measly tech class),
    and if I remember correctly, any transmission on ANY frequency that
    is under 1/4 watt in power is legal, *as long as it doesn't interfere
    with anybody or anything else*.  And supposedly, receiving of any
    radio signal of any power and any frequency is legal, although there
    is currently a lot of debate about that (i.e. speed radar signals,
    cellular phone signals, satellite TV reception, etc)

2.  Size of transmitter/receiver:  I hardly think 10 x 5 x 3 cm is
    *small*.. you can get kits for about $10 (U.S.) that operate
    under 1/4 Watt in the commercial FM band and are about 2 x 2 x 1 cm
    (surface mount, of course), and FM recievers have gotten quite small
    nowadays as well (and that's for 88-108Mhz tunable ones: overkill
    considering you only need one or two frequencies).

3.  The "packet" modem thingy and a 2-meter ham radio will work (I've
    done it), but requires a ham license (most ham rigs wont operate
    under 1 Watt) and considerable expense for the equipment (~$400).

I delved into ultrasonics as a medium, but you tend to be able to hear
the modulating signal .

Hope this helps
Paul Smith   N2KYW
v055qmd6@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu
From: gbutulis@desire.wright.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
Subject: But I LIKE my HP48.
Date: 1 Jan 93 15:27:16 EST
Organization:  Wright State University 


     I think that the sum of arguments presented can be answered fairly
simply: If it doesn't fit your needs, don't buy it.

     I debated the purchase of an HP48 for a considerable time, and ultimately
decided that this was the calculator that best fit my needs as a student at
that moment.  A SPARC would have been nice, as would a NeXT, a CRAY, and a
6-disc CD changer.  I came to the conclusion, however, that the HP48 came the
closest to solving my most prevelant technical needs for the price.  This would
not have been my choice if I were doing 3D graphical Gaussian surfaces, 
computation of thousands of pieces of multidimensional statistical analysis, or
if I were doing finite element analysis.  However, for physics, calc, chem,
etc, it works very well.  I don't need the benifit of something a CRAY, or
MathCad (most of the time), or the such.  I am very happy with my solution to
my needs (ie: if it ain't broke, don't fix it).  If your needs are different,
ie: you want to type a thesis for your graduate studies, please don't buy an
HP48.  Buy a typewriter.

     For those who aren't quite sure what their needs are: most stores around
here have a wonderful 90-day return policy.  If not 90, I'm sure your can at
least find a 30-day return policy.  Take it home.  Play with it.  See if it's
what you need.  Ah, what if you use it for a year or so and then switch majors
to one in which you no longer need the HP?  Sell it.  You could probably get
about $200 for it right now.  If you bought it for about $250, you've lost
$50.  Over 365 days, that's a whopping $.68 a day (you couldn't even feed a
family of 5 in Somolia for that:)).

     Besides, hey, it's a neat toy.

-Garrett Butulis

Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
From: phr@telebit.com (Paul Rubin)
Subject: Prices/features (The "high price" of the HP48!)
Organization: Telebit Corporation; Sunnyvale, CA, USA
	<PHR.93Jan1221624@napa.telebit.com>
	<1993Jan2.112012.449@doug.cae.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 01:07:14 GMT

In article <1993Jan2.112012.449@doug.cae.wisc.edu> kolstad@cae.wisc.edu (Joel Kolstad) writes:

   >Actually, I use a cheap Hercules-type monochrome monitor on my 486 box
   >and find it adequate.

   Ok, I hadn't considered mono monitors.  If you're happy with it, fine...
   probably well over 90% of the PC buyers out there wouldn't be, though.

I'm not crazy about the mono monitor but decided I also wouldn't be
happy with a 14" vga monitor.  If and when I upgrade to vga, it will
be to at least a 17" monitor costing over $1k, which I can't afford
yet.  ("Fly first class if you can, or third class if you must, but
never fly second class").  The point is even the mono monitor I use is
a vast improvement over any calculator.

   >Even the cheapest stuff is usually to be pretty useable.

   I guess I can't really argue that much about cheap PCs.  All of the ones
   I've used have just felt cheap and slow to me.  If you're happy with cheap
   PCs, fine... but I'd really like something like a Gateway 2000 if I were
   buyiing a PC.  (HP produces a fine line of PCs, too, but they really are
   overpriced :-) )

I buy quite a lot of PC stuff and generally find there really isn't
much difference between cheap and more expensive stuff.  Certainly
the speed is almost 100% determined by the cpu type and frequency,
and has nothing to do with whether it comes from a high priced box vendor.

   I don't know why I'd use a $15 Casio over my HP-32S II. :-)  The 32
   does cost something like $50 or $60, though, and a $40 Casio can probably
   do more than it can.  The use of RPN and the similarities in operation with
   my 48 make it worth the extra $$$ to me.  (Actually.... do $40 Casios have
   solvers and integrators in them?  They must, right?)

The $40 Casio I looked at had an integrator that used Simpson's rule
and I don't remember if it had a solver.  HP's numerics really do seem
better than everyone else's.  The 32S-II sounds like a good machine,
and it sounds like I might buy one if I were shopping for a calculator.
From: detlef@dmhh.hanse.de (Detlef Mueller)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
Subject: Re: Register use by RPL
Distribution: world
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 18:38:56 GMT

In article <sourada.725581668@vincent1.iastate.edu> sourada@iastate.edu (Steven D Ourada) writes:
>Where can I find info on the RPL inner loop's use of registers? Specifically,
>I want to know what is in the registers when inline machine language is called,
>and what has to be preserved. But, I'd also like more general knowledge of the
>RPL interface to machine language. 

reg  field  RPL value  means
---  -----  ---------  -----
A    A      O          pointer to the currently executed object
B    A      R          return stack pointer, grows from low to high memory,
                       stack of pointer
C           --         --
D    A      M          free memory in 5 nibbs units between R and I
D0          I          instruction (runstream) pointer
D1          D          data stack pointer, grows from high to low memory,
                       stack of pointer

A general description of the RPL values O,R,M,I and D can be found in
RPLMAN.DOC, contained in HPs TOOLS.EXE selfextractor.

Bye,
        8-Detlef
--
+------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
|`What a depressingly stupid machine'|             Detlef Mueller           |
| -- Marvin                          |          detlef@dmhh.hanse.de        |
+------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
From: phr@telebit.com (Paul Rubin)
Subject: Re: The "high price" of the HP48!
Organization: Telebit Corporation; Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 05:50:30 GMT

In article <C05oEw.7K0@quadsys.com> roland@quadsys.com (Roland Besserer) writes:

   I own a SPARC II, what you would consider a serious computer, as well as
   a DECStation 5000 and they are great machines and do what I want - alas
   they are not portable. The portable 'computer' of my choice is the HP48SX.

   Not only does it contain the EE formulas I use most, I keep my appointment,
   flight schedules on trips, address/telphone book, expense reports and quick
   notes on an HP48SX equipped with 2 128K RAM cards. It is the most portable
   and flexible tool I have. Agreed, I can't type a report on it but it goes
   everywhere I go.

Wouldn't a 95LX be better for most of this?  It has a built-in
appointment calendar, spreadsheet, etc., and you can develop
specialized programs for it much more easily using cross compilers.
Xref: sparky comp.sys.hp48:6478 comp.sys.handhelds:2619 misc.forsale.computers:44107 ba.market.computers:6168 ca.wanted:1604 ucb.wanted:220 ucb.general:144
From: willt@ocf.berkeley.edu (William Ting)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48,comp.sys.handhelds,misc.forsale.computers,ba.market.computers,ca.wanted,ucb.wanted,ucb.general
Subject: >> HP48sx Version E for $199 including  S&H <<
Date: 23 Dec 1992 18:17:16 GMT
Organization: U. C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: lightning.berkeley.edu



I have a HP48SX, version E, in mint condition for sale for $199
including S&H.

If interested, contact Will at willt@ocf.berkeley.edu or
wting@ucsee.berkeley.edu.
From: akcs.ejf@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com (Ed Fasula)
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 22:40:02 GMT
Subject: any Civil Engineering students - is an Hp28s, or an Hp42s enough?
Message-ID: <2b475e78.2313.1comp.sys.hp48.1@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48

RE: 48sx for Civil Engineering

The 48sx with the new SmartROM spreadsheet is a CE student's dream!!  I
just got it a week before finals and used a simple text editor to program
stuff like a beam with or without compression and biaxial bending. 
I used it for my final project and exam.  A serious CE student should buy
both the 48sx and SmartROM.
From: akcs.joehorn@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com (Joseph K. Horn)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 06:40:02 GMT
Subject: Continued Fractions of Square Roots
Message-ID: <2b3fee71.2531comp.sys.hp48@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
Keywords: continued fractions square roots partial quotients

SQPQ - Square Root's Partial Quotients, by Joe Horn, 12/28/92

Turning square roots of integers into continued fractions via the
usual FP INV method rapidly introduces round-off errors, and does not
help in determining where the continued fraction begins to repeat.

The following program, SQPQ, uses a method which neatly avoids all
round-off errors and automatically detects where the repetition
begins.

INSTRUCTIONS: SQPQ takes the integer (not its square root!) as its
input, and returns a list of the partial quotients of the continued
fraction equal to the square root of the input.  The list terminates
immediately after the last term of the repeating sequence.  Therefore
the entire list, except for the first element, repeats.

EXAMPLE: What is the continued fraction for the square root of 18?
18  SQPQ  -->  { 4 4 8 }  which means
SQRT(18) = 4+1/(4+1/(8+1/(4+1/(8+...  with 4 8 repeating.

EXAMPLE: 28  SQPQ  -->  { 5 3 2 3 10 }  which means
SQRT(28) = 5+1/(3+1/(2+1/(3+1/(10+1/(3+1/(2+1/(3+1/(10+...
with 3 2 3 10 repeating.

EXAMPLE: 16  SQPQ  -->  { 4 }  which means it's exactly 4.

%%HP: T(3)A(D)F(.);
@ SQPQ, Square Root's Partial Quotients, by Joe Horn, 12/28/92
\<< DUP \v/
  IF DUP FP
  THEN 0 1 1 \-> N S A B L
    \<<
      DO S A + B / IP DUP B * A - 'A' STO
        N A SQ - B / 'B' STO
        'L' 1 STO+
      UNTIL B 1 ==
      END A DUP + L \->LIST
    \>>
  ELSE SWAP DROP 1 \->LIST
  END
\>>

%%HP: T(1)A(R)F(.); @ SQPQ -jkh- 12/28/92
"D9D20E163278BF1473B13CE2278BF13ABB1AFE22D9D204B2A29C2A29C2A21C43
2D6E2010E4D6E201035D6E201014D6E201024D6E2010C4E16323C032D6E20103
5D6E20101476BA1D6E20102450FA1D6BB178BF1D6E201024EEDA1D6E20101490
DA145632D6E20101497632DCC02D6E2010E4D6E201014624B190DA1D6E201024
50FA145632D6E20102497632DCC0245632D6E2010C4976329C2A2B4402DE032D
6E2010249C2A2279E19B632D6E20101478BF176BA1D6E2010C4387C1EF532B21
305BF22D9D20DBBF18DBF19C2A2387C1B21305DF2293632B2130494F"

BYTES: #F494h 218

BEGIN--cut here--CUT HERE--
begin 600 sqpq
M2%!(4#0X+46=+>!A(X?[03<;PRYRN!^CNZ'O(ITM0"LJR:*2+"K!--+F`@%.
M;2X0,-7F`@%!;2X0(-3F`@%,'C8R#"-M+A`PU>8"`4%GJ]'F`@%"!:_1MAN'
M^]'F`@%"[JW1Y@(!00FM064C;2X0$)1G(\T,TN8"`4YM+A`09$(;":W1Y@(!
M0@6O064C;2X0()1G(\T,0F4C;2X0P)1G(\FBLD0@[3#2Y@(!0LFB(I<>N3;2
MY@(!08?[<;8:;2X0P#1X'/XULA(#M2_2V0*]^X&]'\FB,G@<*S%0_2(Y-K(2
!`_\`
`
end
END--cut here--CUT HERE--

-Joseph K. Horn-   -Peripheral Vision, Ltd.-
akcs.joehorn@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com

From: akcs.levenson@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com (william j. levenson)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 16:40:02 GMT
Subject: Re: Cut-down version of RPLMAN.DOC ??
Message-ID: <2b373bac.2487.2comp.sys.hp48.1@hpcvbbs.cv.hp.com>