From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
Subject: Re: Susan Garvin on Forgery
Followup-To: misc.test
Summary: I think it's wrong, Chaney likes to do it
Keywords: Chaney/Hall, flame, typical
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1992 02:30:29 GMT

In article <1992Oct22.160749.18540@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
#
#
#Susan: 
#
#When you tried to fudge an article and say that I responded to an
#article on Larry Margolis, and you accused me of mistakenly taking
#Margolis' place, you pulled a classic act of net.forgery. 

No, Dennis, forgery is when you alter the from line in your posts,
as you have done, or when you change someone else's words, as
DOD has done.  I reposted two articles, deleting only the text 
that followed the pertinent lines.  There was no forgery
involved.

#Your credibility truly no longer exists now, Miss Theocrat USA.

I'm sure that you wish this were true, Dennis.  

I notice that you have not attempted to prove that I changed
anything in the quotes, nor did you follow through on your
threat to contact my sysadmins.  Now, I know why you have
done neither of these things - you know that you're lying.
I hope that you continue to make false accusations and empty
threats.  It illustrates quite clearly just how ridiculous
you are, and let's everyone feel good about laughing at you.

I'll bet that you're the campus joke, aren't you, little bit?

In article <1992Sep29.155656.17489@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
In article <1992Sep23.160756.8470@wdl.loral.com> bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com (Cranius Sphinctus) writes:

##I'm speechless, actually.  I'm stuck in 7:00-A.M.-no-stimulants-
##in-the-bloodstream hamster wheel over this statement:
##
##Message-ID: <1992Sep23.014327.29219@csus.edu>
#### Oh, I love it when my liberal approach makes me look pro-choice.
##
##He wrote that in a followup to a post by barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet which}i
##presumed that *Larry Margolis* was pro-choice.  I was left with the
##impression that Mr. Chaney was confused about his identity and thought
##he was Larry Margolis for a moment.
#
#No, you stupid shit - it was a response to ME. It was my attribution
#directly before his words.
#
#You've got some major stepping to do, Cranius Sphinctus, to make this lie
#of yours stick. For instance, re-posting that article to show evidence.
In article <1992Sep23.014327.29219@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
#In article <1992Sep22.123959.2529@wkuvx1.bitnet> barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
##In article <1992Sep22.052211.14940@watson.ibm.com>, Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com> writes:
####
####            For heaven's sake, Dan, it's only a TELEVISION SHOW...
#### 
### Going to war with a fictional character is certainly bizarre.
##
##Yes, but criticizing the unrealistic depiction of liberals as "good"
##and conservatives as "evil" is not.  Would you criticize a TV show for
##a strong pro-life message?  If you're pro-choice (I assume you are), I'd
##bet you would.  So back off - Danny was right in his criticisms of the
##show _and_ the character.
#
#Oh, I love it when my liberal approach makes me look pro-choice. 



Ask your priest about lying, Dennis.

Susan