From: rstevew@deeptht.armory.com (Richard Steven Walz)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.sex,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.correct,alt.politics.equality,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: A newcomer to RL has some questions
Date: 26 Jan 93 07:33:46 GMT
Organization: The Armory

In article <1993Jan25.064149.23213@anasazi.com> karl@anasazi.com (Karl Dussik) writes:
>In article <mjones.727484295@fenway> mjones@donald.aix.kingston.ibm.com writes:
>>mykes@shell.portal.com (mike myke schwartz) writes:
>>>francis deck (fdeck@vyasa.helios.nd.edu) wrote:
>>
>>>: 4. Where can I find examples of this so-called "liberal"
>>>:    press?  I recall that most of the major media not only
>>>:    gushed over Ronald Reagan, but practically boiled Jimmy
>>>:    Carter in oil, so I cannot say they are liberal.
>>>The media is plenty negative on Reagan.  As for carter, he deserved
>>>everything he got.  As for examples of the "liberal" press, when
>>>Bush chooses a subject that he prefers not to be interviewd about,
>>>the press hounds him on that subject.
>>
>>Do you see a pattern here? Looks like the press is pretty rough on whoever's
>>in office. Of course, if you believe the right can do no wrong, that
>>translates to "liberal", I guess.
>>
>>>                                       When Clinton did the same thing,
>>>they left him alone.  The press never looked at Clinton's record in
>>>Arkansas.
>>
>>And, of course, they never published any of the rumors about Gennifer
>>Flowers. I must have dreamed that.
>
>But note WHEN they published those "rumors" - early during the primary when
>Clinton was perceived as the least liberal (I just can't bring myself to say
>"most conservative") of the candidates.  The press will always go after the
>more conservative candidate available.  Later, when it came down to just Bush
>and Clinton, the press ignored stories of Clinton giving Gennifer a job that
>should have gone to a black woman (just imagine what the press would have done
>if such an allegation had been made about Bush).
>
>>They never carried any of the lies about
>                               ^^^^
>>Clinton going to Moscow that the Bush campaign put out, either. Mass
>>delusions, I suppose.
>
>What "lies?"  You mean Clinton didn't go to Moscow?  So then, he was lying
>later when he said he DID go to Moscow.  What caused Clinton his trouble
>was his continually changing story about where he went and who he met.
>
>>And I must have gotten the information about Arkansas
>>chicken farms and polluted streams by telepathy.
>>
>
>No, you got it from the Bush ads - the media, just like they did in 1976 with
>Jimmy Carter, largely failed in their obligation to investigate Clinton's
>record as Governor of Arkansas.
>
>But hey, this is water over the bridge.  Clinton won and he has Democrats
>in control of both houses of Congress.  I hope we can all agree that if he
>delivers on his promise to get the economy growing and cut the deficit by
>half, he and the congress deserve to be reelected.  And, on the other hand,
>if he fails, both he and the Democrats in the Congress should be thrown
>out and we should try the only combination we haven't seen in 40 years -
>Republicans controlling the White House, the Senate and the House of Repre-
>sentatives.
>
>Karl Dussik
-----------------------
What if Clinton and the Congress make it a better place to live and tax the
fuck out of the rich and reduce the deficit by only 5% per year? That's
better than any administration did since before WWII! As for an all
republican House, Senate, and Presidency, that hasn't ever happened because
people don't typically trust republicans. They wish to reserve republicans
for our enemies, not ourselves! That's why it's always a foreign policy
repub president and a domestically liberal congress! If you had a repub
Congress and Presidency, it would probably enslave us all to corporate
America and give us cancer in 4 years!
-RSW

-- 
* Richard STEVEn Walz   rstevew@deeptht.armory.com   (408) 429-1200  *
* 515 Maple Street #1   * Without safe and free abortion women are   *
* Santa Cruz, CA 95060    organ-surrogates to unwanted parasites.*   *
* Real Men would never accept organ-slavery and will protect Women.  *
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.sex,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.correct,alt.politics.equality,alt.politics.homosexuality,talk.abortion,alt.politics.clinton