From: niepornt@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Marc Nieporent)
Subject: Re: SC rally: "We don't want a draft dodger for p
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 07:04:07 GMT

In article <1992Sep11.163757.11381@hemlock.cray.com> rja@redwood26.cray.com (Russ Anderson) writes:
>In <1992Sep11.152200.11549@anasazi.com>, best@anasazi.com (Mike Best) writes:
>> In article <1992Sep10.182647.27390@technology.com> richard@technology.com (Richard Murphy) writes:
>> >In article <1992Sep10.113614.29185@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> jlinder@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Jeffrey S Linder) writes:

>> >>Why is it an irrelevant issue?  Because Clinton supporters say it is?  If 
>> >>voters are concerned about Clinton's integrity than it should be an issue
>> >>to Clinton.

*Voters* don't seem to be concerned about these things at all.  Just
Bush supporters desperate to cover up their own failures.

>> >If one party had a monopoly on integrity then it might be an issue. However,
>> >this is not the case. There is obviously an integrity gap with Bush over
>> >Iran-Contra.
 
>> It is _not_ obvious at all.

>Yea, Weinberger was probably just joking when he made the notes showing
>Bush in the loop.  That Casper, what a joker...

Yeah, and was Bob Dole just kidding when he told Bush to stop lying
about his record back in 1988?

>>                              If there was anything obvious about this 
>> case then we would have had many convictions (which hasn't happened)
>> for the tens of millions that have been spent.

>There were convictions, but they were overturned because the the convictions
>used the convicted peoples own testimony, after being promised that it would
>not be used.

Yeah, and that EvilCriminalLovingCommunist L-word ACLU even supported
Oliver North.  Do you think Ollie realizes this?

Actually, the appeals courts just found that Walsh didn't
demonstrate that he hadn't used the immunized testimony.  They didn't
actually say that he did use the testimony.

>> >There is another one with the Norriega business when he was
>> >VP & when he was head of the CIA. Personally, I think that trying to predict
>> >what someone might do based on things they have already done is only a
>> >gamble. Who could have predicted the great commie basher Nixon would go to
>> >China or that he would break the law later? If Clinton tells a different story
>> >on his draft history, how is that any different than Bush telling a different
>> >story on why he signed the tax increase? Or for that matter, does anyone wonder
>> >if Bush knew what one of his sons was doing when he worked for a mafia type
>> >down in Florida?

Did we forget Saddam Hussein?  Ask about the agriculture subsidies.  Ask
about the veto of sanctions on Iraq.  Ask about the cover-up at the
Atlanta branch of BNL.

>> Look, anybody can _say_ anything to get elected.

>Ain't that the truth.  Read My Lips...

>>                                                   The real indicator of
>> how they really will react is by examining their past behavior. 

>Like failing to notice when the country is in a recession?

It's all a plot by the liberal media, actually.  And the gays.  And the
feminists.  They've managed to trick people into thinking they're
unemployed.

-- 
David M. Nieporent   | Orioles 1992 World Series Champions
niepornt@phoenix.    | Mike Mussina 1992 AL Cy Young Winner
   princeton.edu     | Brady Anderson 1992 AL MVP
Vote Clinton/Gore '92.   Four more months!
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc