From: dchatterjee@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian
Subject: Re: Massacre in Kashmir
Date: 8 Jan 93 17:30:02 CST
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services

In article <C0Jn6G.3v8@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v122npej@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu 
(Sareer A Fazili) writes:
> This is in response to Vivek, he of the firm faith in the "security forces"
> lodged some 500,000 strong in Kashmir. It is too bad that some of us can't see
> the writing on the wall when it comes to the brutal force being used by the
> forces on the INNOCENT Kashmiri civilian population. As I have stated in the
> past, for every gun-toting militant shot by India, good for them. That is what
> they are up against when they wage a war such as the one they are engaged in.
> However, when the civilians feel the effects of the backlash after the army
> gets hit by the MUJAHEDDIN, then that is wrong. 
>
 As you have rightly claimed Mujhadeen will always be *tortured* and probably
 given a "Mussorie shower" by IA. However your nasty support for Kashmiri
 militants - who are nothing but JKLF (Pak aided) forces, is another proof that
 a supporter of "dar-ul-Islams" like yourself, is nothing more than a hollow
 empty tin-drum making the cacophonous noise beaten over and over again by the
 Pakistani Lying Machine (a la Islamabad propaganda). India already has the
 information that Pakistan has the nuclear technology - to drop bombs in India
 as the first attempt. One cannot expect any good out of such persons - who
 have most likely appointed you as their spokesperson. Now that U.S-Pak
 relations been on the decline, Pakistan better change her generally-terrorist
 views on Kashmir. It would otherwise be the last chance for both Kashmir and
 Pakistan to enter the civilized world. 

 Moreover, including all dar-ul-Islambadis like yourself, probably might take
 care because the worst part of the riots may not be over yet. (Read the NYT,
 22nd Nov. (special report) by Ed. Gargan).
 
 
> And if you think that this "insurgency" is quieting down, then you are
> mistaken. Kashmiris have decided that it is now or never, and are not going to
> stop until they get what they want. Anybody who believes that Kashmiris are
> happy with the presence of the Occupational Forces need only ask those whose
> sons have been beaten and tortured, whose daughters have been raped, and those
> who have felt the invective of these "peacekeepers." What India has started,
> there can be no end to unless they see the light. That sun is slowly but surely
> starting to rise in Kashmir.
> 
> 
> Sareer A. Fazili

 Again I am quite happy to congratulate you on your "correct" view on Islamic
 insurgency. GOI will and has crushed severely the Islamic/ Hindu militancy
 in the past. This time the riots have shown that the voice of the majority
 (Hindus) be better listened to. Moreover, Islamic oligarchy in Kashmir aided
 by Pakistan will also get under attack unless the Islamic country resorts to
 more civilized measures. The attack will come from the United Nations. I am
 pretty sure that Pakistan will not like to get crushed by others.

 It is also important to assess India's recent blunder. India, in the recent
 times, has indicated that Israel allow then expelled Arab/ PLO militants to 
 return back into Israel. This interference by India really sucks. It is
 entirely because of such stupid moves by Rao and his enlightened co. that
 India will see a rise in Islamic and Hindu fundamentalism - with warring
 factions on both sides. 

 I am really appalled because it is exactly this _mentality_ that drove the
 LTTE militants against India. Why bother with others ???? If someone cannot
 behave properly in a country then whatever that country decides is her sole
 responsibility. It is a total infringement on someone soverignity. This
 attitude encourages tadpoles like Pakistan, Bangladesh etc. to raise their
 voice against India.

    Enough said for now,

     - deb chatterjee
    (a good samaritan) 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian