HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: David.Fox@Saigon.COM
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: converting from Demacs (DOS Emacs) to Emreal emacs
Date: 9 Sep 92 00:43:54 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Station Zebra Corp, Sunnyvale CA Ph:408-739-1520

I am a user of Demacs, the DOS version of Emacs.  Recently I installed
386bsd unix, and got the binary for emacs.  I tried bringing over the
documentation files from Demacs onto the Unix partition, but I was only
partly successful, and I'm having trouble setting all the files up in
the right places.

In Demacs, there were about 13 files Emacs.1 through Emacs.13 for info
browser and for the documentation (describe-key-briefly, apropos, etc.)

I've gotten the files - at least for info-browser, in /usr/local/emacs/info
and that seems all right so far.  Yet emacs wants something called doc-18.58.4
in the /usr/local/emacs/etc, and somehow I don't seem to have that file.

However, it seems to me I think that these files are used for two things, and
then I can link (via ln) the two sets of files, so that emacs.1 becomes
doc-18.58.1, emacs.2 becomes doc-18.58.2, and so forth.  But when I do this,
the descriptions with describe-key-briefly are all screwed up.  I think
partly the reason is that the cr/lf at the end of each line in a DOS texgt
file got stripped to just an LF, and because of that, all the file offsets
are wrong.
 
Am I just better off getting the whole thing (sans the binary) from somewhere
as a tar, and then installing it?  Also, Demacs doesn't seem to have a lot
of macros compared to the ones in the GNU Emacs manual - stuff like rectangles
sort, hanoi, dissociate are simply not there.  Would the full thing have it?

I also need some help in setting up emacs to recognize the PC arrow keys
under unix.
Newsgroups: comp.emacs,comp.editors,gnu.gcc.help,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools,gnu.emacs.help
From: thite@micrografx.com
Subject: Re: Emacs under MS-Windows (was: MicroEMACS under GUI - what&where?)
Organization: Micrografx, Inc.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 92 19:07:17 GMT

Dave Weisman (weisman@osf.org) wrote:
: 
: Mirco writes:
: 
: 	Now I heard of other versions of MicroEMACS for
: 	window-orientated enviroments (MS Windows, XWindows, ...). Up to
: 	now I haven't discovered yet which versions do exist or where to
: 	get them. 
: 
: I've been a very, very happy demacs user for some time now.  Some
: of my current work is under MS-Windows and unfortunately demacs
: doesn't work in that model.  It's not just that demacs isn't
: written as a typical Windows program, but it also doesn't run
: under a Windows/DOS session.  (The specific problem is that a
: Windows/DOS session supports DPMI, but demacs/go32 likes VCPI.)
: 
: Has anyone researched what's necessary to either port GO32 to
: DPMI, or, take a deep breath, do a real emacs port to Windows?

GO32 can't run until DPMI 1.0 is supported by Windows.  No DPMI 1.0
server is available.  Windows supports/presents DPMI 0.9xxx

The only option I see to get what you want is to DJGPP to compile
to the a.out file and load that a.out file yourself via some tricks
and techniques with the WINMEM32.DLL provided with the SDK.  Others
(including myself) have done this.  If I had permission, I'd post
the way I do this, but Micrografx currently owns what I do.

I do understand there is a MEM32 lib someone else did is available
on the net.

Tom Hite
thite@micrografx.com

Newsgroups: comp.emacs,comp.text.tex,gnu.emacs.help
From: ju8025@fasolt.albany.edu (Johannes Ullrich)
Subject: Re: Printing a LaTeX document within GNU Emacs
Organization: State University of New York at Albany
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 13:34:00 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.003720.28013@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> awb7h@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Andrew William Bartelt) writes:
>
>I use GNU Emacs in LaTeX mode to edit my LaTeX documents.  The
>TeX-dvi-print-command is "lpr -d" where -d indicates the printer
>should print a .dvi file.   Unfortunately the printer I am using can't
>support this option. What I currently due is type 
>dvips file_name.dvi | lpr 
>from the shell in Unix.
>Is there any way to change the Tex-dvi-print-command to 
>dvips $FILE | lpr
>or something like that.
>
[stuff deleted]
>Andrew W. Bartelt           UVa: 325 Roberta Gwathmey
>awb7h@virginia.edu               Station #1  22904-0008

There is a variable: TeX-dvi-print-command which is set by default to "lpr -d".
If you change this variable in your .emacs file you have want you want.

BTW there is also TeX-how-queue-command which ets the shell command to show the
print queue.

bye,

     Johannes.


-- 
Johannes Ullrich               ju8025@csc.albany.edu            
SUNY Albany                    ju8025@albnyvms.bitnet 
Center for X-Ray Optics        phone (518) 442 4496     
************************ Have fun *********************************************
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: vemula@cs.ucf.edu (Udaya B. Vemulapati)
Subject: spell and TeX --- anyway to avoid deroff?
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 18:56:50 GMT

I use "spell-buffer" function to spell-check my TeX/LaTeX files from within
emacs and I noticed the following annoying problem (because of stupid "spell"
program of Unix).

(1) I've a emacs function to remove TeX/LaTeX constructs as a pre-processing
    measure before it goes to spell. But the Unix "spell" program insists on
    passing my buffer through "deroff", apparently to remove troff constructs
    as well as break the input into 1 word per line.
(2) But "deroff" is not sophisticated enough and it blindly looks for any line
    beginning with a period and assumes that it is a troff command and removes
    next two charactres.

To give you an example, the follwoing TeX code 
--------------
as long as $A$ is non-singular $A^TA$ is symmetric and positive definite and
$A^Tb\in\hbox{range}(A^TA)$. Furthermore, conjugate gradient algorithms only
---------------

becomes (after detexing)
--------------
as long as  is non-singular  is symmetric and positive definite and
. Furthermore, conjugate gradient algorithms only
--------------

When this goes through "deroff", it becomes
-----------------
s long as is non-singular  is symmetric and positive definite and
 urthermore, conjugate gradient algorithms only
------------------

Note the "Furthermore" became "urthermore" because of deroff and obviously
"spell" complains that it is mis-spelled. But "emacs" can NOT find that word.

Is there any simple fix? Thanks in advance.
From: jba@ai.mit.edu (Jonathan Amsterdam)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: where is Demacs?
Date: 15 Sep 92 19:51:16 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

Where can I obtain Demacs from?
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: Hamish.Macdonald@x400gate.bnr.ca (Hamish Macdonald)
Subject: Re: shell command and macro completion
Organization: Bell Northern Research
	<JCT.92Sep8091931@se33.wg2.waii.com>
	<1992Sep9.163827.12528@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 92 18:28:48 GMT

>>>>> On 9 Sep 92 16:38:27 GMT,
>>>>> In message <1992Sep9.163827.12528@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>,
>>>>> peta@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu (Peter Whaite) wrote:

[someone puts setting of PATH and MANPATH in .login instead of .cshrc]

Peter> I used to do this but I dont recommend it anymore.  The reason
Peter> is that 'rsh' doesnt run your .login. Its a real pain starting
Peter> up X clients -- you have to explicitly source your .login in
Peter> the command given to the rsh. (Yes you could write your own rsh
Peter> script)

Peter> Also dont forget that everytime path (or PATH) is set it is
Peter> rehashed -- this is what takes the time.  I do it all in one
Peter> shot, and it doesnt appreciably slow things down, e.g.

Or perhaps put the setting of all these in your .cshrc, but condition
it upon the setting of some environment variable.

This variable is unset for the first shell in a process tree.  The
first shell does all the variable setting, and then sets this variable
to some value.

if ( ! $?ENVSET ) then
   setenv PATH ...
   setenv MANPATH ...
   ...

   setenv ENVSET done
endif

This way your environment is setup for every "root" shell (rsh,
login), but is not redone for every subsequent shell (descendant of
the first).
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: xiong@fzi.de (Xiong Xun)
Subject: FAQ
Reply-To: xiong@fzi.de
Organization: Forschungszentrum Informatik (FZI), Karlsruhe, Germany
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 16:06:12 GMT

Hi, there, could someone send me a FAQ list per email. Thanks in adv.

X.X.
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: alb@moose.uvm.edu (Allan L. Bazinet)
Subject: Re: setting up function key for X windows Gnu emacs?
Organization: University of Vermont
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 22:23:33 GMT

In article <BuKu18.9n5@newcastle.ac.uk>, Chris.Brunsdon@newcastle.ac.uk (C. Brunsdon) writes:
|> 
|> On a more general note,  are there any versions of Emacs that
|> offer pull-down menus (or other GUI features) allowing shortcuts
|> to some of the more common keystroke sequences (possibly with
|> some local menu options for particular modes) ?  
|> 
|> The main reason I'm asking this is that several people 
|> have asked my the same question !
|> 
|> Chris Brunsdon

I use the aXe editor for X windows here on an RS6000.  The package
(now at revision 3.1) is available from export.lcs.mit.edu in the
/contrib directory as aXe-3.1.tar.Z.

I think that aXe might be exactly what you're looking for.  It has
user-configurable pull-down menus, among other nice things, while emacs
key sequences still do what you expect them to.

It's a great package, it's free, and it works on a wide variety of 
architectures.

--------------------------------
Allan Bazinet, University of Vermont
Newsgroups: comp.emacs,comp.text.tex,gnu.emacs.help
From: ilya@kronecker.mit.edu (Ilya Zakharevich)
Subject: HELP: dvipm cannot find files to view (it is OS/2)
Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 04:27:53 GMT


Dear netters,

I'm completely stuck now. On any try to open a .dvi file being inside dvipm
it answers 
	Warning 1018: input file ... not found.
I experienced the analogous behaviour from the operation system itself
when it couldn't find some related .dll file (very good choice of the error
message - no words about the dll, only about the file that is for sure there!).
	However, now both dll's for dvipm are on libpath, and it doesn't help.
If you have any suggestions, please contact me any way.

Thanks in advance, Ilya

My system: noname 486/33 AMI, 256K SRAM, ETEQ chipset, 8M 3-chip memory,
2 floppies, noname FAX/Modem 9624, Conner 120M hard drive.
From: hardy@golem.ps.uci.edu (Meinhard E. Mayer (Hardy))
Subject: Re: spell and TeX --- anyway to avoid deroff?
In-reply-to: vemula@cs.ucf.edu's message of Fri, 11 Sep 1992 18:56:50 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Organization: Department of Physics, UC Irvine, CA 92717-4575, USA
Distribution: na
Date: 12 Sep 92 03:29:39 GMT

The fix is to use ispell (preferably v > 3.0) which is smart enough to
know. 
--
Hardy 
-----
Meinhard E. Mayer,  Department of Physics, UC Irvine 
e-mail: hardy@golem.ps.uci.edu (preferred) or MMAYER@UCI.BITNET
From: boyd@acsu.buffalo.edu (Daniel F Boyd)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: shell command and macro completion
Date: 5 Sep 92 03:43:21 GMT
Organization: State University of New York at Buffalo/Comp Sci

In article <1992Sep3.171417.21110@TorreyPinesCA.ncr.com> garye@TorreyPinesCA.ncr.com (Gary Engebretson 3793) writes:
> 2. I would like to map 'M-x occur' to a keyboard macro. 

Actually, you probably DON'T want a keyboard macro.  I assume what you
really want is, "I wanna press a short key sequence, say 'ESC o' to
run the 'occur' command."

If so, what you want is to BIND a KEY to the command 'occur'.  Like
this:

(global-set-key "\eo" 'occur)

This binds "ESC o" to the command 'occur'.

See, in Emacs all the common editing functions are really little
subroutines written in Emacs Lisp, and there is a mechanism which

1. takes your keystrokes
2. looks them up in a keymap, and finds what COMMAND (Lisp subroutine)
   they are 'bound' to
3. runs the Lisp subroutine it found in step 2.

Even the common keys like Control-N only perform their function
because they are bound to commands.  There is actually a command
called 'next-line', and the only reason the cursor goes down when you
hit Control-N is because Control-N is BOUND to 'next-line'.
	If someone sneaky was to rebind Control-N to something else,
then Control-N would no longer move the cursor down.

This is in contrast to PC programs like WordPerfect where the
commands are hardwired to the keys, so that Down-Arrow ALWAYS moves
the cursor down.  This is a little more messy, and the only way to
write programs that control WordPerfect is to make WordPerfect pretend
you're pressing keys in a certain order.

In Emacs, you can make a new command directly (by writing in LISP) and
bind a key to it -- this is how new commands are created.  Now,
sometimes when you're editing, you want to do something specialized --
and there is no exact command for it -- and you wish you could just
say, "Watch what I'm doing, and do it over and over again."  THEN, you
use a KEYBOARD MACRO.


-- 
Daniel F. Boyd -- boyd@cs.buffalo.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"It's not a System called 'X-Windows', it's a window system named 'X',
after the owl on 'Mister Rogers' Neighborhood'".
From: garye@TorreyPinesCA.ncr.com (Gary Engebretson 3793)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: shell command and macro completion
Date: 3 Sep 92 17:14:17 GMT
Organization: NCR (Torrey Pines Development Center)
Disclaimer: This posting does not neccessarily reflect the opinions of NCR.



1. I use csh and have a large .cshrc file. This means that when I do 'M-x shell'
I have to wait while .cshrc is executed. No problem there. But when I do 'ESC !'
.cshrc is also executed which takes a lot of time for no real purpose. The
question is : how can I get 'M-x shell' to execute .cshrc but 'ESC !' to NOT
execute .cshrc?

Ideas that didn't work :
	1. setting SHELL to '/bin/csh -f'
	2. setting SHELL to '/home/ccsh' where /home/ccsh contained
	   '/bin/csh -f'
	3. fooling around with env. variables and then checking for specific
	   values of this variable within .cshrc. This 'kinda' works but
	   it is very kludgey.
        4. turn on/off protections on .cshrc -- works but annoying

2. I would like to map 'M-x occur' to a keyboard macro. No problem you say,
just use  'C-x (' and 'C-x )'. The problem with this is that whatever
search string you enter during macro definition is the one that will be
used every time you execute this macro. BTW, closing the macro with C-x )
BEFORE you enter the search string, which seems like the obvious thing
to do, will simply enter a string of "" as your search string in the macro.
Probably not too useful. So the question is : how do I define a keyboard
macro that will allow me to enter data?

The Info pages discuss 'querying' macros, and I have experimented using some
of the options discussed there, but nothing seems to work as desired.

3. FAQ # 65 discusses the ^M problem within a shell buffer. I have tried the
advice given for csh, but with no visible effect. Is this the whole story
or is there some little  'gotcha' lurking in the shadows?


Gary Engebretson -- gary.engebretsoin@torreypinesca.ncr.com
NCR/Teradata
SAn Diego, CA
-- 
+-------------------------------------------------------+
|        						|
|     Gary Engebretson  (garye)  x3793 -- RDS Group	|
|       						|
|     "I used to be disgusted. Now I'm only amused."	|
|   							|
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
From: steibel@venus.cs.umbc.edu (David M. Steibel)
Subject: Re: DEMACS for OS/2 2.0
Organization: University of Maryland Baltimore Campus
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 02:57:55 GMT

asrael@bob.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Stefan Schoef) writes:
> bjaspan@athena.mit.edu (Barry Jaspan) writes:

>> GNU Emacs 18.58 was ported to OS/2 under a system called emx.  emx binaries
>> run under both DOS and OS/2.  I can not comment on the quality of DEMACS
>> versus GNU Emacs under emx under DOS.
>
> Are you sure?
> To install GNU emacs you need a HPFS partition (which I don't have, since
> I don't have OS/2).
> Does someone actually have an executable version of GNU emacs which runs 
> under pure DOS 5.0?  If the answer to my last question is yes, could 
> that someone please post it to me?

GNU Emacs as ported to OS/2 DOES NOT work under DOS.  Demacs does work
under DOS, but doesn't work under Windows nor under OS/2.  There are a
few Emacs-like editors which function with Windows, but I forget the
names of them.  You would have to read the comp.emacs FAQ to find out
about them.

--
David M. Steibel;  Author of the Demacs FAQ;  Internet: steibel@cs.umbc.edu

The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be measured by the way 
in which its animals are treated. - Mahatma Gandhi.
From: pd@x.co.uk (Paul Davey)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: shell command and macro completion
Date: 8 Sep 92 14:52:48 GMT
Organization: IXI Ltd.

>>>>> On 3 Sep 92 17:14:17 GMT, garye@TorreyPinesCA.ncr.com (Gary Engebretson 3793) said:
 ...
Gary> 1. I use csh and have a large .cshrc file. This means that when I do 'M-x shell'
Gary> I have to wait while .cshrc is executed. No problem there. But when I do 'ESC !'
Gary> .cshrc is also executed which takes a lot of time for no real purpose. The
Gary> question is : how can I get 'M-x shell' to execute .cshrc but 'ESC !' to NOT
Gary> execute .cshrc?

in .cshrc put this at the top

# 			.(T)CSHRC FILE BY PAUL DAVEY			      #
#   See man csh,tcsh for further details or a C-shell Guide of your choice    #
umask 22
# TEST FOR NON-INTERACTIVE SHELL, IF SO EXIT
# This speeds up start of c-shell scripts by not defining aliases, extended path etc
if ($?prompt == 0)  exit

This will stop it being run by any script (really any non tty process).

--
 Regards,			  pd@x.co.uk           IXI Ltd.
	Paul Davey		  pd@ixi.uucp          62-74 Burleigh St.
				  ...!uunet!ixi!pd     Cambridge,  U.K.
 "These _are_ interesting times"  +44 223 462 131      CB1  1OJ
Newsgroups: comp.emacs,comp.text.tex,gnu.emacs.help
From: awb7h@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Andrew William Bartelt)
Subject: Printing a LaTeX document within GNU Emacs
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:37:20 GMT


I use GNU Emacs in LaTeX mode to edit my LaTeX documents.  The
TeX-dvi-print-command is "lpr -d" where -d indicates the printer
should print a .dvi file.   Unfortunately the printer I am using can't
support this option. What I currently due is type 
dvips file_name.dvi | lpr 
from the shell in Unix.
Is there any way to change the Tex-dvi-print-command to 
dvips $FILE | lpr
or something like that.

It is not a big deal to have to execute the shell in order to print
documents, I just thought it would be cool if I could do it from
within GNU Emacs.

Thanks in advance,
--
--
Andrew W. Bartelt           UVa: 325 Roberta Gwathmey
awb7h@virginia.edu               Station #1  22904-0008
From: bjaspan@athena.mit.edu (Barry Jaspan)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: DEMACS for OS/2 2.0
Date: 13 Sep 92 19:56:54 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In article <65757@cup.portal.com>, ts@cup.portal.com (Tim W Smith) writes:
|> > > Will the ported EMACS for DOS (DEMACS) work when used in OS/2 2.0?
|> > Why don't you just use Gnuemacs for OS/2?
|> 
|> One reason would be to use the same binary if you are using a dual boot
|> setup.

GNU Emacs 18.58 was ported to OS/2 under a system called emx.  emx binaries
run under both DOS and OS/2.  I can not comment on the quality of DEMACS
versus GNU Emacs under emx under DOS.

-- 
Barry Jaspan, bjaspan@mit.edu
From: tapio@nic.funet.fi (Tapio Keih{nen)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: Re: Bug in F-PROT? (PC)
Date: 9 Sep 92 10:17:37 GMT

>fprot 2.05 thinks a  couple of menu.com files are infected with CREW.
>However, that happens only w/Quickscan, not  w/ Secure or Heuristics and
>2.04 finds no problem. Unfortunately, Virstop also detects CREW and halts.

I'm quite sure that this is just a false alarm. Crew is not known
outside Finland (although I suspect it has been made in Germany). It
is very slow infector (it infects only .COMs bigger than ~10 kb if the
month is January-May), so it doesn't have too many chances to spread
widely.

You can check the files if they have Crew infection or not by looking
at the end of them. If you can find a big ASCII graphic logo with
texts like 'Notice this: TS ain't smart at all!' etc. But, in case
Crew has reached out to the USA, it might be a new version of it.

If this turns to be a real Crew infection instead of being a false
alarm, I'd like to hear more about it...

- -- 
- --
  Tapio Keihanen  \ rare DIO records wanted /    Holy Father - Holy Ghost
tapio@nic.funet.fi  \                     /  Who's the one who hurts you most?
From: bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Vesselin Bontchev)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: Re: Bugs on my Atari (Atari)
Date: 7 Sep 92 20:03:26 GMT

cmontoya%carina.unm.edu@lynx.unm.edu (Red Dragon) writes:

> I know I'm the not the only person with an old Atari.  I just had a
> bunch of bugs appear on my screen and eat up the screen and trash my

I understand that you have an Atari ST. I am not aware of an Atari
virus which has such a payload, but I am by no means an Atari virus
expert. Nevertheless, you could try checking for the presence of a
joke program loaded during the startup.

> virus and this happens!  BTW, can PC viruses infect my Atari?  I was
> using a DOS disk when this happened.

The Atari ST and the IBM PC use different CPUs, so the programs
designed to run on one of them cannot execute on the other. It is
perfectly possible to write a "dual-platform" virus (especially a boot
sector infector), but nobody has done this yet.

Regards,
Vesselin
- -- 
Vesselin Vladimirov Bontchev          Virus Test Center, University of Hamburg
Tel.:+49-40-54715-224, Fax: +49-40-54715-226      Fachbereich Informatik - AGN
** PGP public key available on demand. **    Vogt-Koelln-Strasse 30, rm. 107 C
e-mail: bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de    D-2000 Hamburg 54, Germany
From: Felix.Lafontaine@f23.n367.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Felix Lafontaine)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: Netware and viruses - some new results (PC)
Date: 30 Aug 92 13:18:00 GMT

JJ> From: JFORD@seebeck.ua.edu
JJ> Newsgroups: comp.virus
JJ> >At QUT, we have set up an experimental network to test viruses
JJ> >networked environments, and the first results have just come
JJ> >Test 1: Exhaustive test of netware preotection setting on
JJ> files and
JJ> >directories against common viruses.
  Thats sound well, but most of the commons virus have an
erradicated status, so what about new viruses, like MTE bases
viruses. 

- --  
Internet: Felix.Lafontaine@f23.n367.z1.FIDONET.ORG
UUCP: ...!myrddin!tct!psycho!367!23!Felix.Lafontaine
Note:psycho is a free gateway between Usenet & Fidonet. For info write to
     root@psycho.fidonet.org.
From: bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Vesselin Bontchev)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: Re: VACSINA Information Wanted (PC)
Date: 7 Sep 92 21:41:26 GMT

AMN@vms.brighton.ac.uk (Anthony Naggs) writes:

> > Is it important that one utility recognised CHKDSK while the other did not?

> Yes, 'EXE' files modified in this way may be corrupted and either fail to
> work or work incorrectly.  This includes a number of programs that
> use overlays or include configuration information in the executable file.

True in general, but this particular virus (Vacsina.05) does not
infect files with internal overlays or trailing configuration info.
So, in this particular case there is no danger.

Regards,
Vesselin
- -- 
Vesselin Vladimirov Bontchev          Virus Test Center, University of Hamburg
Tel.:+49-40-54715-224, Fax: +49-40-54715-226      Fachbereich Informatik - AGN
** PGP public key available on demand. **    Vogt-Koelln-Strasse 30, rm. 107 C
e-mail: bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de    D-2000 Hamburg 54, Germany