From: underdog@leland.Stanford.EDU (Dwight Joe)
Subject: Oriental-ge Women and the Fetish Thing -- Hypocrisy Lives (Re: A question of "loyalty" & this marriage thing)
Keywords: asian, american, racism
Organization: Miners for a Heart of Gold
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 06:35:35 GMT

In article <1govk9INN7g2@agate.berkeley.edu> bhchan@soda.berkeley.edu
(Billy H. Chan) writes:
> In article <1741@rwja.umdnj.edu> jpark@rwja.umdnj.edu (John Park) writes:
> >Just out of curiosity, how many AA's out there have a strong parental
> >pressure to marry asian?
>One right here.  Strong Parental pressure to marry a Chinese or Chinese-
>American female.  Not only is there a racial preference, but there's also

A while ago, numerous Chinese-cu Chinese-ge boys on s.c.a.a. got all upset that
a sizeable portion of Chinese-ge women in the USA are dating/marrying
Caucasian-ge men.  These Chinese-cu boys accused Caucasian-ge men of doing
something morally wrong because they preferred Oriental-ge women.

Gee.  Look at what Mr. Chan, a Chinese-cu, is saying.  His parents want
him to marry exclusively Chinese-ge.  (In fact, there are hordes of
Chinese-cu Chinese-ge boys who want to marry only exclusively Chinese-ge.)

Amazingly, although hordes of Chinese-cu appeared out of nowhere
to condemn Caucasian-ge men (on s.c.a.a.) for preferring only Oriental-ge
women, none of those same Chinese-cu have even once condemned Mr. Chan's
parents (or the hordes of Chinese-cu Chinese-ge boys who prefer only
Chinese-ge women) for wanting their children to marry only Chinese-ge.

Again, let's get back to my original point.
(1) Chinese-ge men who prefer only Chinese-ge women
(2) Caucasian-ge men who prefer only Chinese-ge women
Why do Chinese-cu jerks see a problem with #2 but think that #1 is 
normal?

Various Chinese-cu jerks have come onto this forum to present their
pseudo-intellectual arguments.  They claimed that #2 is wrong because
their preference is not based on sound reasoning; in other words, if
a Caucasian-ge male cannot provide a rational basis for his attraction
to Chinese-ge women, then he is morally depraved, according to the Chinese-cu
jerks.

Well, just what kind of sound reasoning do Mr. Chan's parents have?
Huh?  They don't have any sound reasoning for preferring a Chinese-ge
daughter-in-law.  The only justification that they offer is:
"I just want my son's wife to be Chinese-ge."  So what?  What kind of
justification is that?

But naturally, Chinese-cu jerks think that this is okay and normal.
(What a bunch of hypocrites!)  Don't believe me.  Go back over the last
50 or so posts to this group; not one of those posts accuses Mr. Chan's
parents of being morally depraved.  However, if you go back to those posts
about Caucasian-ge men, you will find that many of those posts denounce 
Caucasian-ge men (and Chinese-ge women who go out with them) as being morally
depraved.

Such incredible hypocrites!

So, why the hypocrisy, you ask?  Well, what's really bothering
these Chinese-cu boys is that they think that they own Chinese-ge women
simply because they are Chinese-ge.  They are horrified that "their"
supply of Chinese-ge women is being diminished by the Caucasian-ge men.
That's the essential truth of the matter.

>an age preference.  They would like me to marry someone of around my own
>age.  However, these pressures are not obvious, they're not spoken directly.
>Nope, my parents are subtle (perhaps all of them are.... dunno, must be
>in that guide the hospital give you when the father's waiting outside the
>delivery-room: "Everything you'd wanted to know about Parenthood, but 
>didn't know how or whom to ask".)
>
> >to marry within the same culture, ie chinese w/chinese, japanese w/japanese
> >	korean w/korean ?
>Most preferrably Chinese (no, make that Cantonese).  But any female of
>East Asian (is that the term?) decent is fine.
>...

------------------------------------------------------------------+------------
Jinsei no imi wa nan desu ka.                Sister, can you      |   \|  |`
Shitte itara oshiete kuremasen ka.           spare a coin?        |    | -+-
                                                                  |   /| / \
Copyright 1992.  Disclaimer:  1 + 1 = 3                           |
------------------------------------------------------------------+------------