From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Clare DOES IT AGAIN!!!!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 14:20:50 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.125909.456@nynexst.com> clare@nynexst.com (Clare Chu) writes:
>>fight molesters. Yet originally your complaint was Diana was correct
>>in not letting her son stick up for himself. Which is it Clare?
>>If your just looking for fight and wanna flip flop around to keep it
>>going I suggest you try your SO. I haven't the time for your name calling
>>nor your fence straddeling.
>
>  What name calling?  I wasn't the one calling you Rambo, GI Joe,
>  etc.  My point is that one must stand up for oneself, but only
>  if the situation warrants.  In Diane (and Dylan's) case, Dylan
>  is a 22 month old baby, so Diane was right in standing up for
>  him by saying things to the father.  Diane's contention is that
 
So far everyone agrees with this. Whats the problem?

>  the father had a lackadasical attitude about his son's unprovoked
>  pushing behavior.  Do you let your 22 month old babies stick up
>  for themselves???  No one said that Diane wouldn't let her son
 
 Against other 22 month old(short of toddler switch blades) yes.
 
>  stick up for himself when he goes to school.  Presumably he'll
>  have better verbal and physical skills by then.  Some 22 month
>  old babies can't even keep their balance, much less push people
>  around.
 
Is there anything new or of value you'd like to say.
 
>> 
>>>>You people [referring to] are 100% certifyably insane.
>>    You people refer's to Clare, Andy and Diana. Phobics the lot of you.
>>Clare you are a psychotic.   
>>Maybe Andy can get a 2 for 1 at the counselors.
>
>  A lot of libelous name-calling.
 
 I see Clare's school of creative editing must be having mid terms.
 Nice attempt to insinuate I was insulting all of misc.kids when
in fact we both knew it was from me to you. Lets see thats the 3rd time
you edited that very same line to make accusations. I pity your(doubtfull)
husband.
 
>
>> Hear let me put it in caps for those with comprehension problems:
>> MY POST REFERRED TO THE FUTURE. SOMETIME SHE WILL HAVE TO SEND HER
>>SON TO SCHOOL. GET IT CLARE. WHAT IS SO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND.
>>Actually I know exactly where the diffuculty is.
>
>  Yes your post was relating to the future.  My contention is the
>  sexist language and the "a man's gotta do..." as if women (girls)
 
Caps for Comprehension problems: CLARE IT'S AN EXPRESSION. TRY TO READ
THE MEANING OF IT INSTEAD OF READING IT LITERAL. FIGURATIVE. IT MEANS
WOMAN AS WELL AS MEN. SAYING A womens gotta do what.. didn't make much
sense when talking about two boys fighting. TAKE A CREATIVE THOUGHT
CLASS INSTEAD OF SPEWING PC BATTER.
 
>  don't have to put up with this.  As several posters and myself have
>  pointed out, girls do indeed have to learn to stand up for themselves.
 
 Thats right I agree. Whats the problem?
 
>  I am not arguing with you about standing up for yourself, but rather
>  the stuff about "putting Dylan in a dress" and "making him wear
>  tights."  Implying that people who wear dresses and tights (mostly
 
 EXPRESSIONS,EXPRESSIONS,EXPRESSIONS,EXPRESSIONS,EXPRESSIONS,EXPRESSIONS
 That help?
 
>  females) do not have to worry about fighting and assertiveness, that
 
 I have no control over what you imply or if you are in a rut.
 
>  these people hide under desks and wait for mommy (or knights) to rescue them.
>> 
 
 Go see the movie robin hood.
 
>> [hypocrisy comments deleted]
 
 Those where quite accurate.
 
>
>  All I see from you is a leap of imagination from a 22-month infant's 
>  relying on his Mommy to a 9 year old getting lunch money stolen every day
>  and hiding under his desk wearing dresses and tights.  Sounds like you 
 
 Take that creative thought class. You desperately need it.
 
>  have a real hostility towards anything that smacks of "feminity".  
 
You are in such a hurry to stick your PC finger at people and label them
I have to wonder, do you still live at home? Do you have an original thought?
If so I'd be willing to attempt to read it.
 
>  I wonder if you allow your boys a good cry every now and then.

Never said they where both boys, you just inferred that. It fit your feminist
basher 'profile' better. If they cry because they don't want to go to bed
I'm not listening to it. If they cry because there mother has broken yet
another promise to them then yes I will let them have a cry. It's enough
to make anyone cry.
 
Goodbye Clare (waving) Have a nice life (waving) You won (waving but getting
smaller) You stuck it out the longest(waving real small) Don't forget to
shut out the lights *blink*....
 

 
================================================================================
 Ipsissimus of the Inner Order of Sesquipedalian Fruitcakes - IIOSF XOX Dawn
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: misc.kids