HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: page@aethelwulf.cs.odu.edu ()
Subject: ken meets jesus
Organization: Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 22:28:33 GMT


ken meets Jesus.

(all of the hypothetical 2nd coming of the lord world tour details
are left to the reader's imagination.  what follows is simply
a transcript of the conversation between alt.flame's human 
tetherball and the Almighty's avatar on earth)

Jesus (J.)--Hello, my son.  I have come to forgive your sins.

ken -- K e n does not sin because K e n is K e n and therefore cannot
	be other than K e n since K e n is K e n is K e n and therefore
	does not sin.  

J.-- All men sin, my child.

ken -- You are misinformed.  K e n is K e n and therefore does not sin.
	Also, K e n is K e n is K e n is K e n and is therefore not	
	your child.

{apostles on scene begin losing lunch}

J.-- Come forward my son, and let me forgive you your transgressions.

ken--You are misinformed.  K e n is K e n is K e n and therefore does
	not 'transgress'.  K e n suggests you initiate proper
	washing procedures.

J.-- ...  





anybody besides the tetherball in questions have anything to add?
d.
-- 
	"There's no way out of here, once you're in 
	you're in for good."   -D. Gilmour
page@cs.odu.edu
From: krobinso@peach.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: K e n Is Not Boring (was Re: Aza.  Is She, or Isn't He?)
Date: 11 Nov 92 19:12:41 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1dp3hfINNi70@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@discovery.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>
>In article <BxIK1I.MDz@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>In article <1dmcorINNh2d@goldwing.ksu.ksu.edu> tilden@goldwing.ksu.ksu.edu (Tilden-Master of Illogic) writes:
>>>
>>>In article <BxB602.E6L@cs.psu.edu>, krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>In article <1dbjpcINNoub@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>>>>>In article <Bx5vzy.208@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>K e n does not bore people, for K e n is K e n, and K e n can only be
>>>>>>K e n, thus K e n is K e n and only K e n.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Wait wait wait a minute...K e n is K e n, therefore K e n does not bore people?
>>>>>I'm having a problem with the logical connection between the two...
>>>>
>>>>Simple, K e n is K e n, and since K e n is K e n, then K e n is K e n,
>>>>and thus K e n is not boring, for K e n can only be K e n.
>>>>
>>>>K e n   R o b i n s o n
>>>
>>>Does K e n have the ability to fucking well refer to himself in the first person?
>>
>>K e n can refer to K e n anyway K e n deems to.
>
>Then refer to yourself as a fool, for that is what you are.

But then K e n would be just like you. But K e n is not like you, thus
K e n is not a fool.

>>>We know K e n is K e n, But K e n is also a fucking dipshit in the honest oppinion
>>>of several million people viewing this part of the net.
>>
>>Perhaps you would like to post your poll of several million people.
>>K e n is interested in what people have to say. K e n requires information
>>at once.
>>
>I would not want to upset you, as if I could, for your ego is to large.

In other words, you never polled several million people. In other words,
you're full of shit.

>>>Also, stop trying to be Zen Budda for us and get a life K E N !!!!!!
>>
>>K e n is not Zen Budda. K e n is K e n. You have been informed.
>>
>This is correct. Zen Budda had more sense that did you.  But it is true that you 
>portray yourself as a philosopher as was Budda.  This is your error.  You lack
>the philosophical background to do this.  But, far be it from me to accuse you
>of this without a test. I then pose you this question:  What is that which is
>eternal in nature, but ends continuously? 

Nothing in nature fits this description.

>I await your answer.

Your answer has been given.

K e n   R o b i n s o n
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar Samant)
Subject: Re: PORTRAIT OF A NET NEWBIE IDIOT: Tushar "Semen" Samant
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 08:41:18 GMT

bur@ultisol.gsfc.nasa.gov (MAC) writes:
>samant@tartarus.uchicago.edu (Tushar "Semen" Samant) writes:
>>
>>[drivel deleted]
>
>A tad sub-par for a snot-nosed freshmen.  

Well, it WAS mac's life story. Let's be reasonable here. Although I must
admit that mac is gaining an awful lot of vocabulary nowadays, complete
with difficult words like "tad" and "sub-par".


>I think the towel on your head is comming loose.  Do go back and do 
>you homework before you try again.
>
>Now, run along and play with the other newbies.
>
>
>TTFN,
>M

In general, the future looks bright for THIS little tot. Cannot get out
of "newbie play with freshmen" mode, but that takes around five years
or so. The ferocious Joycean wordplay apparent in "semen" must have
been lifted from older lamoes, but that's OK. After all, the whole
letter is.

All in all, the only serious hurdles now are MAC's inability to deal with
spellings, compatibility of tense and number, and coherence of discourse. 
But I ask you, how many kids have you seen who are really confident with 
that sort of thing? Even in first grade, I ask you! 

To an accusation like "you are a bozo", even managing a retort like "AM NOT! 
YOU ARE!" is, I'd say, fairly good progress. A lot of adults don't realize
this.

I will continue to watch mac's future with considerable interest.

TA TA, BUT ONLY FOR NOW, MY LITTLE TODDLER.
Sincerely,
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: lamest follow-up ever
Summary: The definition of stupidity.
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:06:54 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

(Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
> Thus K e n, is not "slipping", for K e n has nothing to slip from.
>K e n   R o b i n s o n

How true.  Kenneth's posts cannot be "slipping" into stupidity since 
they were already as stupid as possible.

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.bizarre
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Actual Dan Quayle Interview
Followup-To: alt.aeffle-und-pferdle
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 15:17:57 GMT

> madhaus@netcom.com (Maddi Hausmann) writes:

>Oh yeah, and plenty of other people on the net have acknowledged that
>I am funny.  Guess you lose that argument.

Wait, maddi, if you're so funny, howcome your newsfroup (rec.humor."funny")
is so LAME.

Guess you lose that argument.
From: iacs2210@Oswego.EDU (Bob Ternosky)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Kens stupid posts
Keywords: Ken,idiot
Date: 5 Nov 92 18:35:13 GMT
Reply-To: iacs2210@oswego.Oswego.EDU (Bob Ternosky)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Instructional Computing Center, SUNY at Oswego, Oswego, NY

In article <Bx5vCr.1G6@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@tealblue.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>>personally, 'I' think that this isn't the real ken.  he's been
>>overtaken by aliens.  somebody shoot him
>
>K e n is K e n and K e n cannot be anything other than K e n.
>
>K e n   R o b i n s o n
Fellow flamers lets look at this wonderful piece of drivel from ken.
Me is me and I cannot be anything other than me.
Sounds a little redundant to me (sorry about that 3 syllable word ken)
Ken you need to go to the library or a book store and look for a nice dictionarybefore you post again. Most of the people in this group are high school grads.
so this wonderful piece of drivel you put up is kind of nauseating.

IMHO, ken was not overtaken by aliens, I think he had a sex change operation
and Robs dog doesn't like him anymore.

-----
.sigs suck
                 Bob Ternosky
From: king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: B O R I N G
Date: 9 Nov 92 14:18:54 GMT
Organization: Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine

In article <BxB602.E6L@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:

This diminuative PSU buttwipe seems to be going through the whole gamut
of crayola colours. One would suppose that he is configuring diskless
workstations on the local net. Demanding job for someone with such a
miniscule intellect.

>Simple, K e n is K e n, and since K e n is K e n, then K e n is K e n,
>and thus K e n is not boring, for K e n can only be K e n.

Can't you thing of anything new to say? The above infantile tripe is nothing 
short of absolutely B O R I N G.

-- 
                       Se non e` vero, e` ben trovato 
     ...{utzoo|mnetor}!dciem!dretor!king        king@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.bizarre
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Gloat
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 14:58:04 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.134313.25017@oz.plymouth.edu> m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu (Michael L. Le Houllier) writes:
>In article <1992Nov5.060913.10011@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mbur@nyx.cs.du.edu (MAC) writes:
>>
>>
>>Like I said over there to those wankers in alt.politics.bush and alt.fan.rush-
>>limbaugh, 'tain't nothin' like a little gloating.   HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHA
>>Bush lost!!!  HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA!!
>>
>And when the economy sees unheard of lows as a result of Clinton's
>policies, Republicans will take the Congress for the first time in 40
>years and Jack Kemp will take the White House to begin another long
>period of Republican administration, this time without that bothersome
>Democrat Congress.
>

TAKE YOUR BUSHIE CRAP AND RAM IT GENTLY INTO THE ORIFICE OF YOUR CHOICE,
CANKER SORE. what makes you think talk.bizarre and misc.test are good
places for you to spew your republican jism. wake up, smell the coffee.

YOU LOST
YOU ARE A LOSER



>
>God bless,
>
>Michael
>
>(Oh thats right, you Commie-libs think God is unconstitutional - forgot)

Yes, Bill Clinton, like all southern baptists from arkansas, is a raging
commie who hates god. jesus, mike, you seem to be in need of a little
therapy. i repeat: BUSH LOST THE ELECTION IS OVER CHILL OUT LOSER



>-- 
> Michael Le Houllier           *  John 3:16  * Nov 12, 1991 - Dili      
> (m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu.us) *  Remember: June 4, 1989 - Beijing
> GO BLUE JAYS!!!   BEAT THE BRAVES!!!!
> ANNOY THE MEDIA.  RE-ELECT BUSH!!

and once again i am amazed at how stupid your sig is. please post no
more articles in talk.bizarre, dick for brains.
From: bufalini@among.gis.psu.edu (Bruce A Bufalini)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: PSU
Summary: Lara loves toilets
Date: 12 Nov 92 16:07:10 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <1dpg7pINNijq@morrow.stanford.edu> EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara) writes:
>i saw a bumper sticker here at stanford yesterday.  it said
>
>
>           Penn State
>           and pissed at U
>
>
>whoever would have thought that someone from PSU would be capable of
>traversing the country via automobile.  perhaps mommy drove.

I know that people from PSU are capable of driving, as I and many thousand
others of us drive every day.  Mommy is not needed for such a task.

>given the fact that they were on stanford property, they probably
>were leaving after a stint of toilet-cleaning.  somebody's gotta do
>it :)

No one from PSU has been asked to clean Stanford toilets; therefore, you must
find someone else to complete your task.  Doing it yourselves would be a good
idea, since "someone's gotta do it."

--
Bruce A Bufalini (bufalini@among.gis.psu.edu) | Plus ca change,
P$U Geographic Information Systems            | Plus c'est la meme chose.
                                              |
                                              | Neil Peart, 1978
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: a female Democrat on Clinton
Date: 5 Nov 92 15:14:22 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <1992Nov4.211922.1@cubldr.colorado.edu> maltese_r@cubldr.colorado.edu writes:

>oh yes having babies is the one thing men can't do so ipso facto it must
>be a bad thing, right?  so let's suppress it!
>
in what way does clinton supress your right to have babies, cuntbag?

is he proposing any law that would in any way impede your right to have
as many babies as you wish?

nothing personal, but you're a stupid cunt. i love how people like you
try to turn legalizing something (ie less government restriction) into
'oppression'. how fucking politically correct can you get. die, bitch.
you want more laws banning more things, try saudi arabia or turkey.
there they really respect women's rights.
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Troll stutters a reply [Was Re: SPAM I AM, Cretin you are.]
Date: 11 Nov 92 19:20:30 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
>     CRETINOUS CRAWLER.  It's not just an insult.  It's what you are.
>
>					Troll

  Oooh!  Nice use of alliteration, fish-bait.  Bite me, Bumptious ButtHead.

>
>P.S.  Gee Andy, where's Opie?  I didn't know you were down thar in Texass, the
>biggest shithole in America.  Say hi to all of my loudmouth, ignorant, redneck,
>hick texann fans like Rob and others too trivial too remember.  Much obliged.

Why, Opie's right hyar.  Y'all c'mon down.  Lil Opie's wanting to kick yore
wizened butt too.  Now, hol on a minit that, lil feller!  Don't let that
lil heart of yorn go a-flutterin like that!  Don't be skeered. I won't let
him hurt ye too gol-darned bad.

By the way, anonymous-boy...  Rob's in Virginia.  We were going to let him
move down here, but all the cattle complained.

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Rabbit-knowing
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: rec
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 16:21:40 GMT

> jcc@frog.CRDS.COM (Jim Chagnon) writes:
>
> I dont know why you guys think being in love with a rabbit is so scandalous.
> I have been having a very warm relationship with my rabbit for years now,
> and it has only recently ceased to be platonic. Making love to my rabbit is
> the warmest feeling Ive ever known. Any of you who call me weird should
> just try it for yourself.
>Jim Chagnon  jcc@frog.UUCP


thanks for sharing, jim. really.

r
From: dvp@getafix (Dave Parry)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: troll antagonizes the U.K., 1 if by land, 2 if by sea . . . .
Date: 6 Nov 92 16:29:43 GMT
Organization: ICL, Bracknell, Berks, UK
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

Hey Trolley, a response at last from you!

jmb14@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:
> well, we'll leave the clean up to British Petroleum.
> 
Yeah, wouldn't want to give the job to Exxon. 

> I guess having you expendable Britons is just as good as paying for more
> infantry bullet stoppers in our own military. 
> 
Well with one Brit being worth ten Yanks, even you can see that it's only
good business.

> > BTW, what's a "ciminal colony"? Don't think I've heard of one of those.
> 
> *It's sort of like a faggot colony like the one you live in, (if you're
> culturally blinded, see France for a more blatant example). 
> 
You're really stretching here Trolley, what with heterosexuals now being
in the minority in the good ol' USofA

> P.S. We're #1, WE'RE #1, We're #1, hahhahahhahah h ah ahhahahaa !!!!!
 
Do you recall what you said in one of your earlier postings about
Austrailia being made up of a bunch of convicts exported there (I'm
paraphrasing cos I don't have your post to hand, but the flavour's
correct)? Well, here on TV the other night, was a prime example of
American womanhood, Angela Dworkin (sp). Debating on behalf of Political
Correctness (another American gift to the world). Anyway, during her
speech, she discussed the early American settlers and how they consisted
of people who had "run away" or "fled" from regimes in Europe and Russia 
that they found too hard to live in. Now early Austrailians may have
been convicts, but they were sent there, theyhad no choice in the
matter. They weren't a bunch of wimps and whiners who jumped ship when
the going got tough! Who had to kick the shit out of the Native
Americans (with the aid of 'modern' weaponry) just to try and convince
themselves they really weren't the bunch of yellow, small-minded, religous
bigots that they really were. Moving on, examples of the mighty US
in action during the 19th century. Supplying diseased blankets to Indian
tribes, massacring (sp) whole tribes - men, women and children. Here
we have the big brave American, doing what he does best;
kicking the shit out of any group smaller in number and less well equiped
than him. Moving on; Grenada. Christ, even Clint Eastwood made a movie
of this. America's finest hour since WWII.  
 Finally, before you mention the War of Independance, remember, the only
reason Britain let you have America was that we like having a good stretch
of water between us and the French!

Live long and prosper Trolley old son.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ Dave Parry  ICL, Bracknell, Berks, UK | "Send more paramedics.."--
------ email = dvp@oasis.icl.co.uk           | 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.flame,talk.bizarre
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: i say kill bush
Keywords: die
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 14:54:40 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.134019.24660@oz.plymouth.edu> m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu (Michael L. Le Houllier) writes:
>In article <1992Nov5.063938.11566@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> pfinerty@nyx.cs.du.edu (big daddy hate box) writes:
>>i want bush's head on a pike stuck in my front lawn. fucker. i hate that
>>man more than anyone i don't know personally. i want quayle to be pres for
>>a couple of weeks and then we kill him and let foley do it for a while.
>>then we kill him too and give it to baker. yeah, i say we take the
>>opportunity to really fuck with D.C. 
>
>If this is indicative of Clinton supporters, this nation's in worse
>shape than I thought.


well, thats one hell of a pearle of wisdom, asswipe. why did you post
this valuable knowledge into misc.test? besides, as you might notice by
the lack of the word 'clinton' in the article, pjf is, like me, a 
bush hater, and no big fan of clinton. in fact, the bush's head on a
pike image has been with me for a while too.
>
>-- 
> Michael Le Houllier           *  John 3:16  * Nov 12, 1991 - Dili      
> (m_lehoul@oz.plymouth.edu.us) *  Remember: June 4, 1989 - Beijing
> GO BLUE JAYS!!!   BEAT THE BRAVES!!!!
> ANNOY THE MEDIA.  RE-ELECT BUSH!!


ISNT about time to change your sig, dork?
the blue jays won
bush lost

NOW DIE ASSWIPE
From: amanda.vantslot@synapse.org (Amanda Vantslot) 
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Lame Flame
Date: 8 Nov 92 14:37:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: SYNAPSE BBS - GATINEAU, QUEBEC - 819-561-4321
Reply-To: amanda.vantslot@synapse.org (Amanda Vantslot) 

TO: alt.flame
FROM: amanda.vantslot@synapse.org

>      AMANDA,  YOU IGNORANT SLOT!
>
>      No flame.  Just wanted to get that off my chest.
>      Thank you.
>
>      -- Andy

That has got to be the most pathetic insult I have ever heard.  How old
are you 6, 7?  Go back to your fingerpainting.
                           A. van't Slot
From: EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: troll antagonized by Lara, film @ 11
Date: 9 Nov 1992 10:40:51 -0800
Organization: Stanford University
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu

In article <BxBvtn.5v5@sdf.lonestar.org>,
tad@sdf.lonestar.org (Tad Dowe) writes:
>In article <1d43qtINNt1q@morrow.stanford.edu> EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara) writes:
>>In article <Bx2wEq.K92@sdf.lonestar.org>,
>>tad@sdf.lonestar.org (Tad Dowe) writes:
>>>In article <1cpajcINNrb5@morrow.stanford.edu> EP.LLD@forsythe.stanford.edu (Lara) writes:
>
>>>>and you don't get to call me madame unless you pay first.  in cash.
>
>>>How much cash?
>
>>well, that was an easy hook.  but i've a feeling you can't afford me
>>:)  as they say, if you have to ask how much ....
>>now, if you'll give me the number off your gold card, i'll consider
>>speaking to you in public again.  THERE's a departure point worth my
>>time :)
>
>AND mine, I am sure! However, isn't this the juncture where we quibble about
>the price; status having been determined, as Churchill was supposed to have
>said?
>
>Tad

no, this is the point where i name a humongous sum, and after you
get up off the floor you pay it anyway for the sure knowledge of
having such an exquisite ...  !  figuring that aside from those
kodak moments that you'll treasure for life, and having a GREAT
story to tell all your buds, you know that it would have been worth
it at twice the price!

moi

{checking back in to confirm my original opinion that exactly the
same thing has been happening ... i know, it hasn't been six months
yet, but i felt like i just spent six months reading this 'froup!}

'la victoire'!!
From: liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: THE ULTIMATE FLAME OF FLAMES
Date: 10 Nov 1992 15:13:09 GMT
Organization: WPI - land of the warlorded .sigs!
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <1992Nov10.084803.19683@latcs1.lat.oz.au> ooi@latcs2.lat.oz.au 
(Jeffrey K Ooi) writes:
>usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.Edu writes:
>
>>{lameness and whitespace deleted)
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>  Jeffrey (George bush) Ooi |   Ghostrider, you're instructed to land...    
>>>  La Trobe University       |   Land Immediately!  What're you doin' Mav?
>>>  Australia                 |   We ain't got no fuel for this...
>>   ^^^^^^^^^
>
>>you already flamed yourself, why should i bother?
>
>At least I have a signature!

Ooooooh!  Oooooooh!  What a steller comeback.  I'm so very impressed.

>Which is more than I can say about Mr Aussie hater here, or do you prefer
>the occasional Rodney King riot or two hmmm?  This country must be too boring 
>for you!

Rodney King riot?  Well, lesse...I know about the Rodney King beating, and
the subsequent trial of those officers who beat him up, and the L.A. 
riots, but I feel that I am misinformed about the 'Rodney King riot'.  
And anyways, the L.A. riots were all staged for the benefit of the rest
of the world, to show that the American people are truly concerned with 
racial issues.

NOT!  We all know Americans couldn't give a shit about racial issues
unless they happen to be a member of a particular minority group, in
which case they aren't real Americans anyways...  

[smileys for the sarcasm impaired]

Oh, and please take your .sig and shove it.  Not only is it stupid, it's
not even worth warlording.  Get thee to an editor for inclusion of
a BUAF and tacky border design!

					--Liz

--
my ego ate my .sig, but not my Eagles quote...
"Her mind is Tiffany twisted..."
From: krobinso@apricot.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: B O R I N G
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:40:19 GMT
Organization: Penn State Computer Science

In article <6592@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca> king@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King) writes:
>In article <BxB602.E6L@cs.psu.edu> krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson) writes:
>
>This diminuative PSU buttwipe seems to be going through the whole gamut
>of crayola colours. One would suppose that he is configuring diskless
>workstations on the local net. Demanding job for someone with such a
>miniscule intellect.

You are incorrect, for K e n is on a mission to inform the misinformed.
And since you are misinformed, K e n has successfully completed K e n's
task of informing you. You have been informed.
>
>>Simple, K e n is K e n, and since K e n is K e n, then K e n is K e n,
>>and thus K e n is not boring, for K e n can only be K e n.
>
>Can't you thing of anything new to say? The above infantile tripe is nothing 
>short of absolutely B O R I N G.

When one continues to be misinformed, then K e n can only respond
accordingly. K e n suggests that you take your playthings somewhere
else far away, so that the rest of us can be informed. Further
outbreaks such as this, and K e n will force you to play Parcheesi
with Kevin "Dog Dung" Darcy and Jimmy "Kangaroo Krap" Keegan. The
nicknames were obtained from a confidential source.

K e n   R o b i n s o n