HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jem@sunSITE.unc.edu (Jonathan Magid)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: where is the NEW telnetd ?
Keywords: telnetd location
Date: 21 Dec 92 18:18:23 GMT
Organization: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

In article <simmon.724957537@maxwell> simmon@eeel.nist.gov (Eric Simmon) writes:
>I am trying to get telnet (tcpip) running with the new kernel (0.99),
>I can telnet out of my machine, but I can not telnet in from the outside.
>Someone mentioned that there is a new telnetd which solves these probs.
>Is this true, and if so where is telnetd?

there is a fairly new telnetd on sunsite.unc.edu in /pub/Linux/system/Network 

I am still having some problems with it though, on my machine; it takes
about a minute to allow a login.  I 've heard that this is
becuase I am not running named and it is waiting for named timing out;

I'm going to look into this though...

jem.

-- 
Jonathan Magid     jem@sunSITE.unc.edu       sunSITE Administrator
Virtual pizza Delivery (tm)::faxed in 30 cycles or less or you get it
----------------------------------------FREE!!!-----------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: russed@rebecca.its.rpi.edu (Daniel Russell)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: linux 0.99 patchlevel 1
Keywords: kernel, linux, 0.99 patchlevel 1
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 01:27:01 GMT

torvalds@cc.helsinki.fi (Linus Torvalds) writes:

>Linux-0.99.1 is now available on nic.funet.fi, and will probably show up
>on the other linux ftp sites within days, unless everybody has gone off
>for the holidays. ...

	I have uploaded the files:
linux-0.99.1.tar.Z    and
linux-0.99.patch1.Z

	to sunsite.unc.edu:pub/Linux/Incoming to limit overseas traffic.
(I'll be going off for the holidays tomorrow (hooray!))

[...]
>		Linus

[...]
>Thanks. 

	Thank _you_, Linus!
 dan
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: wonge@fraser.sfu.ca (Edmund Wong)
Subject: sockets  and kernels?  <yummy for breakfasts! NOT!>
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 17:03:46 GMT

   After a VERY frustrating and fruitless duel with these stupid
socket problems, I had to revert to my SECRET weapon.  Here.

   The problem that I'm having with Linux is that when the system
boots up, and /etc/inet/rc.net is executed, the following three
commands give me a "socket: Invalid argument":-

    # in /etc/inet/rc.net
    .
    .
    HOSTS=/usr/etc/inet/hosts
    CONFIG=/usr/etc/inet/config
    INETD=/usr/etc/inet/inetd
    NAMED=/usr/etc/inet/named
    PORTMAP=/usr/etc/inet/portmap
    NFSD=/usr/etc/inet/nfsd
    MOUNTD=/usr/etc/inet/mountd
    #
    HOSTNAME=`hostname`
    #
    echo "$HOSTNAME -> $IPADDR"
    #
    ROUTER=0.0.0.0
    NET=142.101.245.0
    #
    $CONFIG loopback $IPADDR
    $CONFIG loopback 127.0.0.1
    $CONFIG -n $NET -r $ROUTER eth0 $IPADDR
    #
    ....<the normal 'if [...' stuff..>

   

  Now, of course, being quite an experimental young lad, I changed
'$CONFIG loopback $IPADDR' to '$CONFIG $HOSTNAME $IPADDR', still
it gives me 'socket: Invalid argument'.   

  So I figured.  Hey, maybe it's something wrong with config*,
so I back'ed up the old config, and compiled config.c and
ran it. (since I did a 'cc config.c' I had to rename the a.out
to config)   Then I re-ran rc.net.  But to still no avail.

   Someone suggested I get rid of 'eth0' and change it to 'loopback',
so I did.  Still the same ugly result.

   So, if possible, can someone please enlighten me on what is
going on?  The hostname IS defined as 'eagles'. No, I'm not in
a network.  Does that mean I won't be needing TCP/IP to work?

   Secondly, an easy question about kernels.  I've downloaded
the Linux 0.99pl0 kernel from tsx, and did the neccessary stuff
to compile it.  After I did a 'make dep;make clean' and sync'd
and rebooted the system, it still displays '.98pl5-3?' right
before (root@softland).  Why?    

  
  Any help appreciated....thanks
 
-- 
InterNet: wonge@fraser.sfu.ca  |  "Fail not; Learn Not.
                               |  It is with failing, that one learns,
                               |  So by Learning, one must fail." - Edmund Wong
From: ccasted@prism.gatech.EDU (Edward Deering Boykin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Xfree again
Date: 26 Dec 92 00:02:42 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

I tried to install the new version of Xfree86 (1.1) when I did I used my
*Xconfig file from 1.0. I installed the packeges buut got some broken pipes
when using zcat < xkit | tar xvfBp - and zcat < xman |tar xvfBp -.
I went ahead and started x but I got these error:
failed to set defaulkt path /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/
usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc/xconq
fatal server error: couldmt open default font 'fixed' giving up

I now the faq says to look in the directories and see if fonts.dir and
fonts.alias = the fonts in the directory. Well I looked but the two files
wee pretty much greek to me.  I saw the names of files in the directory
in the files. but I have noo idea what else to look for. Could someone give
me a better idea of what to search for? Pleae. I had xfree1.0 running fine
but want to get 1.1 going now. I got the binaried ad other files from
sunsite.

Ed Boykin
ccasted@prism.gatech.edu

-- 
BOYKIN,EDWARD D    Wanna-be Experimental Aircraft Builder Extraordinare
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
Internet: ccasted@prism.gatech.edu
	  gt5584e@prism.gatech.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: zmbenhal@netcom.com (Zeyd M. Ben-Halim)
Subject: Re: ps/top & 0.99 Linux
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:59:52 GMT

In article <BzM238.M17@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil> dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci) writes:
>After compiling ps98 with 98.4 patches using gcc 2.2.2d and Linux 0.99
>it comes back without reporting any processes.  I did "ps -U" a number
>of times, and my 0.99 source & object files are the same as the /Image
>I am running.

You have to RECOMPILE ps et al.

>
>I guess with my 486/33, the processes run so fast that "ps" (and top)
>can't see them :-).

You lucky people :-)

>
>Heeeeeeeellllp!
>
>-- 
>===========================================================================
>  phil perucci      | "Any opinions expressed are solely my own views and 
>  ssb1pzp@digex.com |  do not reflect the position of any organization"
>===========================================================================


Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: tweek@netcom.com (Michael D. Maxfield)
Subject: Re: Question which has half to do with linux, half to do with hardware
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 17:24:55 GMT

In article <1hsij3INNhqu@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> ah200@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Randy Beiter) writes:
>
>this, but here it goes. I just got a 386 motherboard so I could run linux
>*did have 286, blech* I systematically dis-assembled my 286, and built the
>386 only thing different was the case and motherboard. Well, when I booted
>I found I kept getting drive not ready errors on C: in msdos, well, after
>alot of playing around I found out this only happened when I tried to write
>to the drive, after this I found to my surprise that when the turbo switch
>was off, putting me in I think 8mhz mode, the drive works fine, however in
>33mhz mode, it complained. Any idea how I could get this drive to handle

I had this problem a bit ago when building a 286.  After little help from 
idiots at the self service computer center who could only say "You'll
have to bring it in" I found the problem.  It sounds very similar to 
your problem, even though the platform is different.

Check your wait states.  Make sure they are NOT set to zero.  I found
out that everything on my system worked fine after setting ALL my wait
states to one.  Prior to that, neither my 100 meg IDE nor my two 20 meg
mfms would write properly.  Infact, I even corupted the formatting on
the mfms.  


       tweek@netcom.com  tweek@tweekco.uucp  WWIVNet 5@5058  4@5056 
          I'd rather get my cable service from the phone company,
                than my phone service from the cable company.

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: bkuhn@cs.loyola.edu (Bradley " b " Kuhn)
Subject: Re: gcc 2.3.3
Organization: Loyola College in Maryland
	<1992Dec31.000117.5907@serval.net.wsu.edu>
Date: 31 Dec 92 20:33:34

In article <1992Dec31.000117.5907@serval.net.wsu.edu> hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu) writes:

>   In article <1hr66bINNt25@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>, pdp@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU (Paul Douglas Page) writes:
>   |> Hi there,
>   |> I was wondering if anyone has tried compiling gcc 2.3.3 for linux ?
>   |> The tar file for the source is over 7 mb long so I thought I'd check
>   |> to see if it worked ok befor I downloaded it.
>   |> 
>   |> thanks in advance.
>   |> 

>   gcc 2.3.3 (386/486) is on tsx-11 under pub/linux/GCC.

What is the advantage of 2.3.3 over 2.2.2d?  Is it worth going through
the trouble of getting it?  Also, would one have to recompile all
programs that used dynmic linking?



--

 -- Bradley M. Kuhn    Computer Systems Development, Inc.

     INTERNET: bkuhn@cs.loyola.edu, bkuhn@loyola.edu, kuhn@cpwsca.psc.edu,
               rhlab!bkuhn@uunet.uu.net (take your pick :-)
     BITNET:   bkuhn@loyvax.BITNET
     UUCP:     ...uunet!rhlab!bkuhn
     SNAIL:    100 W. Cold Spring Lane, Box: 141, Baltimore, MD   21210
     VOICE:    (410) 617-(4343 || 4497), (x4343 || x4497 on Loyola Campus)

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
Subject: Re: Another Question about AST 4Port Boards & Linux
Reply-To: tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o)
Organization: The Internet
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 07:09:34 GMT

   From: marcf@nexus.yorku.ca (Marc G Fournier)
   Date: 23 Dec 92 18:58:03 GMT

	   The next question is *how* to set it up....does it automatically
   detect the AST board and configure itself accordingly?  This is basically
   my last hurdle/worry about installing Linux.  Everythig else seems quite
   simple to get going...I just want to make sure what is involved with my
   AST board.

It pretty much will detect things and configure itself accordingly; if
you are using a system where AUTO_IRQ has been disabled, as I believe it
is on the latest release of Linux (I haven't had a chance to test out
0.99 yet, since I'm home in Chicago on vacation), then you need to set
it up to use IRQ 2 if it is configured to use 0x1A0 as its base I/O
address, and IRQ 5 if it is configured to use 0x2A0 as its base I/O
address.

Other than that, it'll simply just work.  If you already have another
serial card, or an internal modem in your system, make sure the dip
switches which configure two of the AST ports as COM1/COM2 are disabled
--- otherwise, you will have a conflict.  If you don't have any other
serial cards in your system, it doesn't matter whether you select
COM1/COM2 emulation or not.  It'll just change what /dev/ttysXX devices
will access the ports on your AST FourPort.

						- Ted


Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Subject: Re: Could some one recompile lpr/lpd
Organization: School of EECS, Washington State University
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 00:00:26 GMT

In article <C01LsJ.4Ku@utdallas.edu>, ramesh@utdallas.edu (R. Ramesh) writes:
|> 
|> Since as supplied lpr/lpd does not work (due to some library problems - such
|> as missing tcp/ip routines - per Peter) I wanted to compile these my self.
|> So I got the source, painfully patches the diffs (from bir7) by hand and
|> got the sources ready for compilation. What a pity, it needs gcc 2.3.2 or
|> the syslog routines. Could some kind sole take over what I have and produce a
|> working library. May be something statically linked until all the libraries
|> surface.
|> 
|> Please e-mail for the sources. Thanks in advance for help.
|> 
|> Ramesh

Please get libc 4.2 from tsx-11 under pub/linux/GCC.

H.J.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: amartell@nyx.cs.du.edu (Alex Martelli)
Subject: Re: [Q] How to change text video mode in SLS startup
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 08:42:07 GMT

mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) writes:
	...
>> It comes up extended without asking.  rdev -v /vmlinux -3, now rdev
>> -v says mode is 65553, and STILL it does not ask - comes up extended
>> anyway.

>The boot sector in /vmlinux is ignored.  Try `rdev -v /dev/hda -3' (or
>`rdev -v /dev/sda -3').

Thanks for the tip, but, no go.  I have rdev -v'd to -3 everything I could
think of, including /dev/hda, /dev/hda2 (where things reside), /vmlinux,
even a bootable floppy, and it STILL comes up extended without asking!
Maybe the lilo in the SLS 0.99 distribution is just too obsolete (it's
version 5, I think; file dates in early september) and I should get a new
one...?


Alex
--
Alex Martelli - preferred email alex@am.sublink.org
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.windows.x.i386unix
From: jtsilla@damon.ccs.northeastern.edu (James Tsillas)
Subject: Re: XFree 1.1 with T8900; mixed results.
Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA
	<1992Dec28.181842.21972@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 19:51:57 GMT


To answer the first question (Why only use 64k with the Mono server):

	As you may be aware the PC architecture only supports shared
memory in 64k segments in the range between 640k and 1024k in real
memory. Designers wishing to make more shared memory available have been
forced to provide a bank switching mechanism to allow access to that
memory in 64k chunks. A display driver would therefore need to map a
"virtual" flat range of memory to a segmented range. This is done by the
color server which can address in excess of 64k. The monochrome server
has no support yet for the flat to segmented mapping so you are limited
to the 64k (flat) segment. An effort is underway to implement a banked
driver for the monochrome server which (if all goes well) will become
part of XFree86 in some future release (That's all I can say about this
at this point).

regards,
-Jim.
--
	***  James Tsillas  jtsilla@damon.ccs.northeastern.edu   ***
	***      Work: (508)898-2800, Home: (617)641-0513        ***
	***        "He is after me. Jim is after him."           ***
	***            - Hop on Pop, Dr. Seuss                   ***
From: hlu@luke.eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: gcc 2.3.3
Date: 1 Jan 93 07:23:16 GMT
Article-I.D.: serval.1993Jan1.072316.17647
Organization: Washington State University!

In article <BKUHN.92Dec31203334@cs.loyola.edu> bkuhn@cs.loyola.edu (Bradley " b " Kuhn) writes:
>
>>   gcc 2.3.3 (386/486) is on tsx-11 under pub/linux/GCC.
>
>What is the advantage of 2.3.3 over 2.2.2d?  Is it worth going through

Bug fixes and code improvements. If you use g++, get it.

>the trouble of getting it?  Also, would one have to recompile all
>programs that used dynmic linking?
>

No. I didn't.

>
>

H.J.
From: ianking@nnsgs50.tcom.stc.co.uk (Ian King)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: HELP! Linux wont see my hard disk (OS2/SCSI Future Dom)
Date: 21 Dec 1992 12:48:16 GMT
Organization: Northern Telecom Europe Ltd
Distribution: world
Reply-To: ianking@lon40.nt.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: nnsgs50.lon40.nt.com

Help!! For the first time ever, I've down loaded SLS 0.99 and I cant
get Linux to see my hard disk. (home system)

MY SYSTEM
---------
486/33 700MB SCSI hard disk, Future Domain TMC860.
SVGA, MS Bus Mouse, DRDOS, OS2 2v0.

The hard disk is partitioned using OS2 fdisk as follows:
1. DRDOS    Bootable   C:Primary FAT           31MB
2. os2_root Bootable   D:Logical HPFS          60MB
3. os2_data Bootable   E:Logical HPFS         140MB
4.          none       F:Logical FAT           32MB
5. Linux    Bootable   G:Logical FAT           64MB
6.          free space                        307MB
7.          startable   :Primary BOOT MANAGER   1MB

WHAT I DID
----------
I created the linux partition using OS2's fdisk.
I then booted the box using SLS a1 (boot) and SLS a2 (root).
When linux boots it says:
/dev/ram  on / type minix
/dev/hda2 on /mnt type minix
/dev/fd0H1440 on /user type minix (defaults)

MY PROBLEM!!
-----------
When I type fdisk it says "unable to read /dev/hda". 
If I try /dev/hda2 it says the same.

Also linux seems to think that my mouse is a Logitech mouse whereas
its an MS bus mouse.:-(

Can anyone help?

Best Regards
............Ian

ADVANCE MICRO COMPUTERS LTD & Wolverton Rail | EMAIL: ianking@amicro.demon.co.uk
 PO Box 362, Olney, Nr. Milton Keynes,       |   or   ianking@lon40.nt.com
  Bucks, MK46 5ES, ENGLAND, UK.              |                ^^^^^^^^^^^^ UK not USA
   TEL: +44 (0)234-711615 FAX: +44 (0)234-240976 MOBILE: +44 (0)831-535618
-- 
ADVANCE MICRO COMPUTERS LTD & Wolverton Rail | EMAIL: ianking@amicro.demon.co.uk
 PO Box 362, Olney, Nr. Milton Keynes,       |   or   ianking@lon40.nt.com
  Bucks, MK46 5ES, ENGLAND, UK.              |                ^^^^^^^^^^^^ UK not USA
   TEL: +44 (0)234-711615 FAX: +44 (0)234-240976 MOBILE: +44 (0)831-535618
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: erc@unislc.uucp (Ed Carp)
Subject: Re: 0.99.2 compile prob #2
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 04:10:28 GMT

Stephen Wong S M (a080700@hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk) wrote:

: Okay, no matter soft link or actual copy, the .99p2 cannot be compiled.
: I've grep all files from the patch kit and patched files, I CANNOT find
: definition for KEYBOARD_BH, and that's why the make process cannot be
: completed.

KEYBOARD_BH is defined in /usr/include/linux/interrupt.h
-- 
Ed Carp			erc@apple.com, erc@saturn.upl.com	801/538-0177
1935 will go down in history.  For the first time, a civilized nation has
full gun registration.  Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient,
and the world will follow our lead into the future.  --Adolf Hitler
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: adelt@imada.ou.dk (Adel Shavandi)
Subject: [ioctl TIOCSPGRP failed in terminal-inferior: Not a typewriter] ???!!!
Summary: [ioctl TIOCSPGRP failed in terminal-inferior: Not a typewriter] ??!!
Keywords: [ioctl TIOCSRGRP failed in terminal-inferior: Not a typewriter] ??!!
Organization: Dept. of Math. & Computer Science, Odense University, Denmark
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 15:06:01 GMT




I will really appraciate any kind of hints/help to find out what is wrong.
I have installed the SLS .98p5 and upgraded the kernel image to 0.99p1, so
I boot with a floppy made by 'make disk' of this version. I have also
upgraded the X of SLS to XFree1.1 and installed XView3L2. To upgrade the
kernel I have only recompiled the kernel 0.99p1 and replaced the boot image
with it. I hope this has been enough (I don't know much about operating 
systems!). 


Now the problem:

	1) When I reboot the computer or turn it on, I get the message
		
			ioctl: Invalid argument

	2) I compile an application which I have written using XView, and
	   then I try to run it in an xterm with bash.
	   What happens is that the application returns immediately without
	   anything happening. Just like running a null application.

	3) I try to run the application in xxgdb. First I get the message:

	[ioctl TIOCSPGRP failed in terminal-inferior: Not a typewriter]

	  in the window of xxgdb, and then the application runs as it should.




Now my question is:


	1) Is this problem arised from upgrading the system in a wrong way?

	2) or is the problem source the fail somewhere when starting the 
	   system where I get the message: 'ioctl: Invalid argument'?

	3) or ?

	4) When upgrading the kernel, is it enough to replace the old Image
	   with the one built by recompiling the new kernel source. Or are
	   there any other things which are dependent on the new version of
	   the kernel?



I would really love to have a usable system. I hope some Linux/? experts can
help me to find the source of the problem.





				Thanks in advance,

						Ade'l


Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: riepe@ifwsn4.ifw.uni-hannover.de (Michael Riepe)
Subject: Re: xterm:  unable to find usable termcap entr
Reply-To: riepe@ifwsn4.ifw.uni-hannover.de
Organization: University of Hannover (Germany), IFW
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 02:54:44 GMT

In article 11142@netcom.com, wongi@netcom.com (Isaac Wong) writes:
|>
|>that's the xterm error i get when X is started by non-root. any clue?

Yes, you're lucky (I think so)! Try 'TERM=xterm xterm &' - if that
works, remove the 'TERM=<something>' line(s) from your ~/.bashrc and
~/.bash_profile (or .tcshrc or whatever) file(s).

Michael.
-- 
 Michael Riepe               <riepe@ifwsn4.ifw.uni-hannover.de>
 Universit"at Hannover
 Institut f"ur Fertigungstechnik und Spanende Werkzeugmaschinen
 Schlosswender Str. 5               W-3000 Hannover 1 (Germany)
 ...life is a sexually transmitted desease !
From: hellers@cs.wisc.edu (Joe Hellerstein)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: cross-compilation (Ultrix --> Linux)
Date: 29 Dec 92 23:02:34 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: Univ. of Wisconsin @ Madison, CS Dept.

Has anybody gotten gcc on Ultrix to build objects for Linux?  Is it
something that can be done by someone without intimate knowledge of
gcc?

Joe Hellerstein
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: 0.99 pl 0/1 fine, but breaks xdm -nodaemon
From: hamilton@golem.wcc.govt.nz (Michael Hamilton)
Date: 23 Dec 1992 18:02:52 +1300
Organization: Wellington City Council, Wellington, NZ
Keywords: kernel linux 0.99
NNTP-Posting-Host: golem.wcc.govt.nz

I've just built 0.99 pl1.  And so far things seem pretty good.  The
patches went in clean, and the config stuff seems to work fine.  I've
only discovered one hitch: it concerns xdm, which I don't normally
use, but I thought I'd mention it.  This build was on a plain 386DX
ISA IDE box, I'll build 0.99pl1 on work's 486DX EISA SCSI box tomorrow
and report back on any problems.  The 486 has been running 0.99 with
all the tcp/ip nfs stuff without any problems (other than those
expected due to the ALPHA/BETA nature of much of the ancilliary
software).

All this progress in just one year - thanks to all involved.

xdm -nodaemon no longer works for me.  If I boot 0.99 pl0, it also
doesn't work, so I rebooted the last kernel I used before 0.99 (0.98
pl5) and everything works fine.  The X background comes up, but
I think xdm fails to grab the console input, as I have to press
a key to make it continue, and then when the login window appears
I can't enter anything.

One possibility is that something about my system is mis-configured,
and 0.98 was more forgiving.  /dev/console and /dev/tty0 are

		crw-rw-rw 1 root system 4, 0

which seems correct.  Startx works fine.

Can anyone else confirm this problem.
-- 
Michael Hamilton, Computer Services Section, Wellington City Council, P.O. Box
2199, Wellington, New Zealand.  Phone: (64) (4)801-3300  FAX: (64) (4)801-3020
Domain: hamilton@csc.wcc.govt.nz          PSImail: PSI%0530147000090::HAMILTON 
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: anderson@zymurgy.bms.com (Jay Anderson)
Subject: Re: Offline Mail Reader for Linux?
Organization: BMS Pharmaceutical Research Institute
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 14:14:41 GMT

>>>>> On Tue, 22 Dec 1992 08:02:04 GMT, erc@unislc.uucp (Ed Carp) said:
Ed> Savio Lam (lam836@cs.cuhk.hk) wrote:

Ed> : Can anyone suggest an offline mail reader for Linux that supports
Ed> : the QWK format?

Ed> Yes.  ATP QWK 1.3 is what I'm running - apparantly, there is a 1.4, but I
Ed> don't have it.
Ed> -- 

Where can this package be found?  Archie came up empty for me looking
for it.

Jay
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Jay Anderson                      anderson@optical.bms.com
Imaging Systems Admin
Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute
Princeton, NJ 08543               Work: (609)-252-6039