From: math1pf@elroy.uh.edu (Zheng, Ping)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: BASIC DECENCY
Date: 2 Oct 92 20:15:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Houston
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Oct2.174440.26932@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, dtc9h@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (David Thomas Croft) writes...
>From root Fri Oct  2 12:55:59 1992
>Received: from NETIX.COM by glueckauf.che.Virginia.EDU (AIX 3.1/UCB 5.61/4.03)
>          id AA04764; Fri, 2 Oct 92 12:55:50 -0400
>Received: by netix.com (4.1/LLNL-1.18)
>	id AA03263; Fri, 2 Oct 92 09:54:18 PDT
>Received: from CORNELLC.cit.cornell.edu by netix.com (4.1/LLNL-1.18)
>	id AA03258; Fri, 2 Oct 92 09:53:49 PDT
>Received: from CWU.BITNET by CORNELLC.cit.cornell.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
>   with BSMTP id 2456; Fri, 02 Oct 92 12:59:17 EDT
>Received: from CWU.BITNET by CWU.BITNET (PMDF #12518) id
> <01GPGWB9XZKW8WWN5L@CWU.BITNET>; Fri, 2 Oct 1992 09:55 PST
>Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 09:55 PST
>Sender: "No Blood Abuse Mailing List"
>	<blood-card-request@netix.com>
>Return-Path: <blood-card-request>
>From: TAN%CWU.BITNET@cornellc.cit.cornell.edu
>Subject: A letter to s.c.c. or/and s.p.c.
>To: blood-card@netix.com
>Message-Id: <01GPGWB9XZKW8WWN5L@CWU.BITNET>
>X-Envelope-To: blood-card@netix.com
>X-Vms-To: IN%"blood-card@netix.com"
>Status: OR
> 
>To whom it may concern:
> 
>I have no accesee to usenet.  Could you kindly help post the following letter to
>soc.politics.china and/or soc.culture.china?  Thanks.

Haven't you just posted your letter here ? Are you sure you know what you are
doing ? I say dear,if you really want to  make some points in front of so
many educated netters ,you'd better show your sanity first!


>**************************   Cut by this line  ****************************
> 
>Dear Later comers (later than April 11, 1990):
> 
>Please rush faxing this letter to the White House at 202-456-2461, or call
>202-456-1111 to voice your OPPOSITION to the bill S1216.  Your inexperience and
>immaturity with American politics are being taken advantage of by the
>blood-carders.
>===============================================================================
> 
>October 2, 1992
> 
>To: President George Bush
>Re: Bill S1216
> 
>Please veto this bill.  It is damaging the interests, equal rights, and equal
>opportunities of Chinese nationals who arrived in this country after April 11,
>1990.
>

I guess this is the truely annoyance to you.Let's see what kind of hypocritical
reasonings you put here:

>The main reason for this bill, as declared, is the STATUS QUO of human
>rights in China.  It is obvious that all Chinese nationals in the U.S., not
>only those who arrived by an arbitrary date nearly three years ago, will be
>confronting similar situation upon returning home if human rights will not
>have improved by July 1993.  Why is this bill aiming to protect only some of
>them, whereas totally ignore the others?
>

What can I say ? Skip !
Or how about a suggestion : Why don't you ask this quesion to some kindergarten
kids ? I believe you will get a lot of satisfied understandable answers. 

>Those who are requesting you to sign the bill may claim they are working for
>the human rights in China.  Have you received so many phone calls, letters, and
>fax for the bill concerning China's MFN, to which Congress has attached human
>rights requirements?
> 

Good points ! But its answer is easy too. Ask president Bush why he vetoed that
bill.Was it because he is not a democracy fighter ? 
.....Still don't get it ? Answer:it's just another way of doing it.It's 
because many of CSS don't agree the way to push China via economic sanction.

>If this bill becomes law, it implies that those who arrived in after April 11,
>1990 do not need protection, because if they did, the bill would have extended
>to cover them.  This will put them in an extremely difficult situation, and
>even deprive the genuine democracy activists of chance of success for regular
>asylum application.
>

Once you come back from a kindergarten,you would know that things you mentioned 
here is somewhat inevitable and if you know some about the corresponding laws,
you will find it's not as bad as you said.

>The bill will also put the late arrivals in a disadvantageous situation when
>they try to stay by finding employment.  Suddenly they have to compete with a
>increased population of permanent residents.  It is obvious that employers are
>more willing to hire permanent residents than foreigners.  I believe many
>American people's jobs or potentials will be negatively influenced by this
>bill, too.
>

Don't try to threaten people. There are hundreds of thousands of 
graduates coming out of college plus around 800,000 new PR's to this country
each year,why these CSS can make so much difference ? Besides, these additional 
PR's will be balanced gradually according to S1216 which again may not hurt you
that much but still makes you worried.

>Your earnest consideration on this issue is highly appreciated.
> 
>Respectfully,
> 
> 
> 
>(Signature)
> 

So,after noticing so many wrong logics in this petition letter,I strongly
urge you to withdraw it(if you know how ),or rewrite a more convincing one.
After all this is a letter to the president of USA representing some of CSS,
it has to be at least a decent one. 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china