HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: zaidioa@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU (Omar A. Zaidi)
Subject: Re: A Progression of Sorts
Reply-To: zaidioa@HYDRA.ROSE-HULMAN.EDU
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 03:22:03 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.181328.7176@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>, karleen sue davis <ksdavis@silver.ucs.indiana.edu> writes:
>Query:  I've been socialized to believe that marriage is the "goal;" that
>the measure of a relationship is how long you stayed together--how close
>you came to the goal.  Now, I KNOW this isn't true; the counter-examples
>are numerous, but I can't seem to get it out of my head, or my heart anyway.
>I'm struggling with the notion that every day I'm with my SO/RP, I'm
>confirming a decision I made when I was (age deleted--TOO YOUNG)...and I'm
>not even feeling old enough to make that kind of a decision NOW, three years
>later.  I don't like the notion of being "mini-married," especially while
>I'm in college.  I don't like living out the decision I made back then...I
>don't want marriage to be just the "next natural step"--I want now to be
>now, and later to be later.  So, I guess the question is; help!  I can see
>from the _hundreds_ of messages I've read that you'll be able to see more
>in what I say than I can from here...I'm so confused I don't even know the
>_question_ anymore!
>
>*sigh*
>Karleen

Well,
	seems to me as if you're feeling like things are a little rushed.
My advice would be to make your RP aware of this and see what he thinks.
Sometimes a little time away (a week or so) where you sort yourself out 
might help.. just my opinion tho...

The Texas Sax Player and hoosier engineer..

zaidioa@rosevc.rose-hulman.edu

Omar Zaidi

Newsgroups: alt.romance
From: jpalmer@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (John D Palmer)
Subject: Re: Nice Guy problems
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 21:20:09 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.144917.10804@sunb10.cs.uiuc.edu> ebratton@sunc7.cs.uiuc.edu (Help Wanted...) writes:
>Help!  Should I try and NOT be so sensitive and give them advice on things, or
>should I not spend much time with them initally, but instead just ask them
>out right off the bat, so that they can't say that they would be jeopardizing
>a friendship?  *sigh*  
>

       Well. . . here's what you should do.
 
    First, *IS* there a problem with your not having a girlfriend?  If
the answer is yes, you are looking for one actively.  If the answer is
no, then you are doing fine.  Sooner or later there will be a woman
who will fall in love with you.  It will just take time.
 
      Okay, assuming 1), since 2) is resolved, you are 'looking'.  You also
seem to imply that you are spending lots of time together with one woman
at a time. . . and the result is not what you want.  (I might ask if you are
also spending lots of tiem with your friends . . . ie, those no-longer-to
-be-considered-available women.  If so, same thing applies)  It would seem
that a more effective use of your time would be seeing more women and
spending less time with each.
 
     AH!  But if you ARE like I WAS, you say "But wait. . .  Sarah needs SOMEONE
to type her paper in tonight, and Mary REALLY wants to go dancing with me 
saturday, and Brenda likes to study with me on sundays. . . "
 
     At which point you realize that "Hey. . . I'm living for other people,
hurting myself.  I should stop hurting myself at all costs. . . since the
hurt isn't getting me anywhere.  Therefore, I should either a) date around
a lot more or b) be satisfied with my friendships as they stand."
 
     And then you're finished. . . because your problem is solved.
 
                                                   John
"I chose b) in the penultimate paragraph.  I don't claim it was 'right',
but I'm still here and I don't regret it. . ."
  

-- 
"Love is cool; I mean, like, really cool.  Like, the coolest thing in
the universe, where, like, people open up inside and show the world how
they feel, and they ain't afraid someone's gonna laugh because they, like,
love themselves already!"  --Personality 42, a generic 60's philosopher
From: dwb4025@rigel.tamu.edu (BARTEK, DAVID WINFIELD)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Hello new found friends
Date: 17 Apr 92 17:10:00 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Hi.. my name is David... i am new to this whole vnews idea, and it is
confusing me i must admit... i just wanted to get into the conversation
some how, and my twisted Texas mind came up with this little intro...
i must say i am very glad to see all of the romantics although i havent
seen very many romantic topics discussed...mostly people "flaming?"
eachother... *shrug*  I have been searching for fellow romantic souls
on IRC and have found but a few... if you use irc, look for Candles...
i normally have a romance channel started... Again, i am looking forward
to talking to some of y'all (Texas slang  =)  ) and let me say finally:
Who are Teresa and Ed?  *confused*

--Candles--
Candlelit Eyes reflecting ashen skies...

YEE HAW!!!!
From: ted5@po.CWRU.Edu (Thomas E. Davidson)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: C'mon, people....
Date: 9 Apr 92 20:49:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: usenet.1992Apr9.204958.18504
Reply-To: ted5@po.CWRU.Edu (Thomas E. Davidson)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)


	Please, let's say something romantic. We sound like high school
gossips.

				Tom
-- 
"I know I'm going nowhere,			Tom Davidson, CWRU '95
"and anywhere's a better place to be."		IRCnick: Cupid	
		--Harry Chapin			MUSHnick: Nicodemus
From: erc@pogo.Corp.Sun.COM (Ed Carp)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Re: Ed and Teresa  (Carp ????)
Date: 16 Apr 92 22:01:54 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogo.corp.sun.com

In article <16APR199215430424@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov> aatresa@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (Teresa Kline) writes:
 
>I just love watching people blush and stutter.  :)

I just love watching you watch me keep it up...:)
--
Ed Carp                                      415/336-0797 (work)

++ UNIX  SysAdmin, Systems  Programming  Services,  Utilities ++
++ and Programmer Productivity Tools                          ++
From: erc@pogo.Corp.Sun.COM (Ed Carp)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Re: a question
Date: 8 Apr 92 20:27:20 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: pogo.corp.sun.com

In article <8APR199209190733@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov> afdenis@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (Stephen Dennison) writes:

>True, ed, but this is a *public* net, ergo I *meant* it was too tastless 
>for even *me* to *post.  If you want tasteless, though, how about ...
>(if you're offended by tastless things, press `n' to skip this)

When have I EVER claimed that?  It's almost impossible to offend me - many
"offensive" things are simply too funny to be taken seriously ... like:

>Creme`o'Wheat !

I'm not sure what's worse - that, or cold Malt-O-Meal...yuck!
--
Ed Carp                                      415/336-0797 (work)

++ UNIX  SysAdmin, Systems  Programming  Services,  Utilities ++
++ and Programmer Productivity Tools                          ++
From: lm89@ecs.soton.ac.uk (McIlhoney L)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Re: -- WorldWideWhine --
Date: 6 Apr 92 12:51:06 GMT


I am there too, dude.  I am 21 and have never been _loved_.  Liked
by lots, maybe, but never loved.  Don't let it get you down.

I'm happy at the moment.  Three reasons why:

1)  The main one: it's Spring here, there is the smell of cut grass
in the air, and it is Easter.  A time of rebirth for me, because I
am a Christian (don't worry, I won't go on about it!)  And also because
my hormones go wild at this time of year.

2)  I have decided there is enough else in my life (my friends, the
BBS - yes, I enjoy that as well, but not to the exclusion of all else,
and the above) to mean that the absence of any immediate hope does
not kill me.

3)  People like me a lot when I am wacky, and cheerful, and do odd
things.  It makes their day less predictable.

The only place I allow myself to appear pessimistic is here.  Deep
down I _AM_ VERY pessimistic, but not miserable, about my current
status.  And the "not miserable" part means that life stands a chance
of getting better even though I don't for a moment think that it will.

You're moving in four weeks?  Perfect!  You can treat that as your
turnabout point.  You'll be starting with a largely new group of people,
who will all have no idea what you're like.

Listen, you are not going to be great,
        you are not going to amazing,
        you are going to be ... amazingly amazing!!!

(Yes, I like Douglas Adams books, too.)

That was all a sudden burst - I didn't alarm anyone did I?
From: 06zonker@ac.dal.ca
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Re: sanctity twist
Date: 17 Apr 92 00:00:37 GMT
Organization: Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In article <sean.casey.14@EMCB.CC.UTAH.EDU>, sean.casey@EMCB.CC.UTAH.EDU (SEAN THOMAS CASEY) writes:
> 
> 	Sorry to sound so blunt on a romance net, but if she started seeing 
> someone else, and kept seeing that someone while y'all were together, then 
> it's time to shake the exit-stick.  If someone doesn't have the honor enough 
> to stay with one or the other, how in the name of God could you trust her 
> later on not to find yet another someone, and maybe run off with him?
> 	To quote Arnold, "HASTA LA VISTA, BABY!!!!!"
> 
> 		Sepiriz of the Nihrain


====================================================================

  Oh good...someone with sense... Don't get carried away with the Arnold
thing, though, the poor guy just might himself compelled to mumble
             I'LL   BE    BACK!!!!!

(brrrr...:)
From: csuat@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Pete "Ganders" Favelle)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Re: Ed and Teresa  (Carp ????)
Date: 15 Apr 92 20:39:01 GMT
Organization: Computing Services, Warwick University, UK
Originator: csuat@lily


on 15 Apr 92 05:04:58 GMT,
dan@mvaxcs1.cse.nau.edu (Dan McMichael) said:
> From article <1992Apr11.093743.10544@willamette.edu>, by ppinkard@willamette.edu (Patrice Pinkard):
>> I think we should let Ed & Teresa work it out between the two of them.  What
>> do you think?  It doesn't REALLY involve anyone other than E & T. 

> I'd say all of this belongs in E-mail.

Hey! But then _we_ don't get to watch :-)

Hugs,

Ganders
--
	      "There's no time for us, there's no place for us."
     "What is this thing that builds our dreams, yet slips away from us?"

-- 
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<
#	     cstxqcv@dcs.warwick.ac.uk / csuat@csv.warwick.ac.uk	     #
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<
Newsgroups: alt.romance,soc.singles,soc.couples
From: joni@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (joni.dunlap)
Subject: Re: Do You Remember - early '60s edition
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 15:56:04 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.183910.14094@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>
>Or how about:
>
>Gyroscopes - real space-age-looking tops that needed a string and
>             could do all sorts of neat tricks

had one

How about wizzers tops that made a wizzing noise.

>
>Chatty Kathy - first doll on the market with a pull-string that
>             would make her talk.  As she got old and thrown around,
>             she'd start to sound like Chuckie.

Didn't she kind of look like chuckie?

>
>Water Rockets - made of red and blue plastic, you'd fill them with
>             water and launch them and I don't know what else they
>             did because we could never get them to work.
>
>Chox -       Multivitamins you could actually chew.
>
>Betsy Wetsy - Doll you'd feed with a toll baby bottle and the
>             water would run out of a hole in her bottom.  My mother
>             wouldn't let me have one.
>
>Patty Playpal - If you pushed her along just the right way, her
>             kneew would unlock and she'd look like she was walking.

I had one of these too

>
>Vrrooooom    - You'd mount it on the handlebars of your bike and turn
>             a key and it would go "vrrooooom..."
>
>
>-Nance
>"You can take Salem out of the country but."
>-- 
>  /\/\                       
>  \  / /\/\  "Love is lovely.    Nance Colucci     att!ihlpk!colucci
>   \/  \  /    Let it grow."   * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ *
>        \/      -Eric Clapton      



Super balls - The large black ones. I could only hold on to one for about
              week without loosing it.

crazy foam - shaving cream in a can with an animal head that squirted out the
             cream and you used to play with it in the bathtub. I remember
             my father getting very upset when I realized that it was just
             shaving cream and he always had a ready supply avaible.

Beatle Boots - I could not go without these, always had to have a pair.
(go go boots)

Space sticks - Some sweet chewy stick loaded with vitamins that the astronauts
               ate in space.

fuzzy wuzzy - Soap that grew hair.

Wasn't there a soap that when you got down to the middle of it there was 
a toy in the middle of it. What was that called?


Joni
Newsgroups: alt.romance,talk.bizarre
From: richh@tigger.jvnc.net (RICHH)
Subject: Re: Newbie ... Please Don't Flame.
Followup-To: rec.nude
Originator: richh@tigger.jvnc.net
Organization: JvNCnet
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 04:43:23 GMT

bentkopj@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Paul J. Bentkowski) writes:

>	My questions might be simple and foolish but please bare 
>	with me.                                            ^^^^
                                                            hee

RICHH
--Um, Paul.  Can we talk?
From: esper@cs35b.cs.umn.edu (Dave Sherohman)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Re: Sanctity Twist
Date: 15 Apr 92 19:06:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: news2.1992Apr15.190605.2424
Organization: University of Minnesota

In article <1992Apr14.211308.10223@javelin.sim.es.com> pashdown@javelin.sim.es.com (Pete Ashdown) writes:
>days.  But still the weekly visits take place.  She tells you how much she is
>stressed by the situation and you decide to neither run away nor make demands.

Key point:  She has told you how stressed she is because of the situation.  Tell
her that the only way to relieve that stress is to decide which of the two of
you she wants to keep seeing and stop seeing the other, but do so without
pressuring her to choose one way or the other.  I think that she may well be
trying to hedge her bets - why is she still seeing both of you?  Perhaps so that
if one of you decides to leave her, she'll still have the other?  Or could she
be afraid of a committment and so she's keeping her loyalties divided?  (Realize
here that I tend to deal with situations by trying to determine why people are
acting as they are, and (hopefully) reacting to their motivations rather than
just their actions.)

esper@ima.umn.edu
Newsgroups: alt.romance,soc.singles,soc.couples
From: hevern@cac.washington.edu (M. Hevern)
Subject: Re: Sanctity of relationships
Organization: U.W. Information Systems
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 07:32:01 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.020454.24278@cbnewsi.cb.att.com>, bicker@cbnewsi.cb.att.com (The Resource, Poet-Magician of Quality) writes:
>                    Stamp Out "SO": "RP" = "Romantic Partner"
                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thank you, I was begining to feel dense.

-- 	MH (At least I'm still "weighted".)
       *--------------------------------*------------------------------*
       | Michael Hevern			| Voice: (206) 685-3229        |
       | University Of Washington	| * "I can't dance...          |
       | Information Systems		|    I can't talk...           |
       | 4545 15th Ave. NE		|    The only funny thing about|
       | Seattle, WA 98105		|    me is the way I walk."    |
       | Mail Stop: JE-41               |       -- Genesis             |
       *--------------------------------*------------------------------*
	Disclaimer: If I said it I probably meant it.  My employer isn't
		responsible for my opinions.
From: blackbourner@bvc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Re: I would like some advice.....
Date: 8 Apr 92 10:06:00 CDT
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA


> 	One side of me says:  Just continue to be friends and if anything
> 			      happens, it will happen naturally.
> 
> 	The other side says:  Why not say somethng?
> 
> 
> 	I think I opt for the first side, but I'm not certain.
> 
> 	Anyone got any ideas.....e-mail would be good...but equally so would
> 	here on the group.
> 
> 	Brendan.
> 	is_b420@kingston.ac.uk

    I say continue to be friends. If something develops, great! If not, you 
won't have lost  a friend.

Erin Sue
Advisor to the  Co-Presidents
Hopeless Romantics of the World Who Were Born in 1973 Club
From: aatresa@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (Teresa Kline)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Re: Candy Francine Glore
Date: 16 Apr 92 23:11:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: lims02.16APR199218112437
Organization: Yeah, *right* !
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr16.192504.4336@thdhub.UUCP>, tjg01@thdhub.UUCP (Terry Gardner) writes...
> 
>	Recently, I've established one of the most piquant and 
>	titillating relationships I've ever had. All due
>	to USENET!!! We plan to meet in San Francisco in May!!!
>	They are scraping me off the celing at work, I'm floating
>	so much!!!!!

So, you're going to the city of the Ed.  Hmmmmm.....  :)

Congratulations...and enjoy!!

-- Teresa

		Life -- just for the FUN of it!!!!
From: montagna@mizar.usc.edu (Catherine Montagna)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Romantic Movies
Date: 6 Apr 1992 16:50:38 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: mizar.usc.edu


Newsgroups: alt.romance
From: kapa@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (k.a.perkins)
Newsgroups: alt.romance,soc.singles,soc.couples
Subject: Re: Sanctity of relationships
Summary: simple minded
Date: 13 Apr 92 20:07:45 GMT
Followup-To: soc.couples
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Apr12.063451.9244@ultra.com>, stcroix@ultra.com (Bill St. Croix) writes:
> >NO, I wouldn't be happy....but I should have thought about her needs
> >before ****** I ****** (and I can't emphasise the word "I" enough)
> >drove her away.  It's not that the guy took or stole her from me, it's
> >that "I" drove her away.  Understand????
> 
> Oh...so you marry a virgin and you are the only one she has ever slept
> with.  Another guy comes along and she sleeps with him. She has a wonderful
> time and "never thought that sex could feel so wonderful" and leaves you.
> That is your fault for driving her away??  No, you'll say it was her fault
> for sleeping with him.  Yes, it is her fault and his too for sleeping with
> him.  It takes two to tango!
> 

This is what is so simple minded about your examples.
"Another guy comes along and your wife sleeps with him."
Why did she do this?  How did they get together?  People who
are happily married in monogamous relationships don't just happen
to sleep with some guy who comes along.  After they slept together,
assuming both spouses regarded it as a problem in the marriage, why didn't 
they work out this problem?  What was wrong between them that they
couldn't get past this problem?  If she didn't want to work it
out and he did, what was wrong between them that she regarded
great sex with a one night stand as more important than her
marriage?  Why was sex with her husband so bad that she didn't want
to try to make it better?

This is just another example of a toppling relationship that
falls because of internal problems (bad sex, bad communication,
someone not getting their needs met).  It may look like an
external push, but it was very tippy to begin with.
Newsgroups: alt.romance,soc.singles,soc.couples
From: archon@buhub.bradley.edu (Ralph Loizzo)
Subject: Re: love songs
Organization: Bradley University
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 16:16:20 GMT

The only reason that you hear love songs when you are mending a broken heart is because you want to satisfy that part of your heart.

No matter how much you try to mend those wounds, the hope for perfection in love never goes away.

You only hear what you want to hear...and that's the truth.

Everyone realizes that, and that's also the beauty of love.

Life is grand, love is paradise.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Well in a hundred years from now
    they will attempt to tell us how
    a scientific means to bliss
    will supercede the human kiss

    a future sugar coated pill
    will give our lovers time to kill
    I think they're working far too much
    for the redundancy of touch...


                            taken from Straight to my Heart by Sting
          --->ARCHON<--
          Ralph Loizzo!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: alt.romance
From: rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft)
Subject: Re: Ed and Teresa
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 05:13:13 GMT

In article <ku9rhlINNfok@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> erc@pogo.Corp.Sun.COM (Ed Carp) writes:
>In article <9APR199208342801@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov> aatresa@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (Teresa Kline) writes:
>>In article <1992Apr9.022834.25112@leland.Stanford.EDU>, rna@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Ashcroft) writes...
>
>>>Ed and Teresa flirt on the net.  Teresa finally calls Ed's bluff and
>>>tells him to ask her out.  Ed wimps out.  
>>That about covers it...:(
>Hey!!!  Wait a minute!!!  WHEN did you ask me out on the net???????

Get with the program Ed...  the woman ain't got all day.

RNA
From: jgacker@ISIS.GSFC.NASA.GOV (James G. Acker)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Upcoming feature
Date: 17 Apr 92 13:48:15 GMT


	I'm about to post something I originally had posted to
alt.personals anonymously.  Since it's no longer anonymous, I no
longer have anything to hide -- the upcoming feature is entitled
"The Universe is Stranger than you Think".  Many of those who saw it
enjoyed it, though I must indicate that it is SATIRICAL.  (Not 
SATYRICAL).
	Hope you enjoy it.

	Jim Acker
	jgacker@isis.gsfc.nasa.gov

	P.S. The reason I'm posting this way is that if I try to
add any text to a forwarded message, the message bounces.

	

Newsgroups: alt.romance
From: ted5@po.CWRU.Edu (Thomas E. Davidson)
Subject: To Ly'nette....
Reply-To: ted5@po.CWRU.Edu (Thomas E. Davidson)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 92 20:13:20 GMT


	I know you lurk.
	Do you know I love you?

		:),
		  Tom
-- 
"I know I'm going nowhere,			Tom Davidson, CWRU '95
"and anywhere's a better place to be."		IRCnick: Cupid	
		--Harry Chapin			MUSHnick: Nicodemus
Newsgroups: alt.romance
From: aatresa@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (Teresa Kline)
Subject: Re: And Now for Something Apartly Similar...(kiss!)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords: READ,KILL,READ,WALK THE DOG,READ,GRIT THY TEETH,READ...
Organization: Yeah, *right* !
Distribution: usa
Date: 15 Apr 1992 08:04 EST  

In article <kuk0bkINN2ar@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM>, erc@pogo.Corp.Sun.COM (Ed Carp) writes...
>In article <13APR199217113464@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov> aatresa@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (Teresa Kline) writes:
>>In article <kuc8q2INNlka@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM>, erc@pogo.Corp.Sun.COM (Ed Carp) writes...
> 
>>>That's right ... and poison is a lady's weapon...
> 
>>>Just thought you ought to know :)
> 
>>*You* might do well to keep that in mind.  :)
> 
>Uh-oh...

Good comeback, Ed!  I'm impressed with your highly advanced vocabulary!!! :)

-- Teresa

		Life -- just for the FUN of it!!!!
From: hrtcu@usho52.hou281.chevron.com (R.T.Cutler)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Subject: Re: Ed and Teresa (Carp ????)
Keywords: Let's mind our own business
Date: 14 Apr 92 02:40:27 GMT
Organization: Chevron

For GOD's sake, consumate this.  DO IT!!!!  And then maybe all of
us can get some sleep.
Xref: sparky alt.romance:6876 soc.singles:10875 soc.couples:2017