HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: fjvwing@cs.vu.nl (FJ!!)
Newsgroups: nlnet.misc
Subject: Re: Waarom zegt niemand wat over de treinstakingen?
Date: 6 Apr 92 11:35:01 GMT
Distribution: nlnet

marc@es.ele.tue.nl (Marc Heijligers) writes:

>Wij kopen geen kaartjes, en zij kontroleren ze niet. De directie gedupeerd
>vanwege het verlies, en een hele hoop mensen ineens heel wat meer begrip voor
>de situatie. 

Ik weet niet hoe effectief dat is. Bijna iedereen heeft tegenwoordig al een of
andere vorm van extra-kaart van de NS (OV, studenten, senioren, korting) dus zo
gedupeerd zal de NS niet zijn, ze hebben al heel veel geld van te voren
binnengehaald.

							FJ!!
Newsgroups: bln.general,de.comp.misc
From: moeller@cs.tu-berlin.de (Torsten Moeller)
Subject: Suche Laserdrucker
Organization: Technical University of Berlin, Germany
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 09:59:22 GMT


Ich suche m"oglichst billig einen Laserdrucker zu kaufen.
(gebraucht o."a., es kann auch ein HP sein ;-) ).

Angebote bitte an:
 
	moeller@cs.tu-berlin.de
From: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis)
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
Subject: Re: Pathalias question
Date: 9 Apr 92 05:23:03 GMT
Distribution: ont
Organization: Elegant Communications Inc., Ottawa, Canada

In article <29E2E5E5.24F4@telly.on.ca> evan@telly.on.ca (Evan Leibovitch) writes:
|In article <1992Apr6.132842.25227@zooid.guild.org>
|	ross@zooid.UUCP (Ross Ridge) writes:

|clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) writes:
|>>I'm confused... why are people using smail 2.5 (and soon a 2.7) when
|>>smail 3.? is available ?

|>Because smail 3.x is:

|>	a) a different program altogether
|>	b) *enormous* (comparatively speaking)
|>	c) vast overkill for uucp-only sites.

|Has anyone here used the mail routing system shipped in SvsVr4 (ie,
|"mailsurr")? Is either "smail" necessary on an R4 system?

This is covered in the Email software survey FAQ.  "mailsurr"
is roughly equivalent to sendmail and/or smail 3.  Supposedly
easier to configure than the former.  Neither smail is necessary.
It does pathalias routing, SMTP, domains, the works.  Even
multicasting.

However, some R4 vendors don't know this, and have screwed things
up by shoe-horning something else in.
-- 
Chris Lewis; clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca; Phone: Canada 613 832-0541
Psroff 3.0 info: psroff-request@ferret.ocunix.on.ca
Ferret list: ferret-request@ferret.ocunix.on.ca
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
From: kennedy@feline.uucp (Sean Kennedy)
Subject: Re: Anyone running a for-pay Unix bulletin-board system?
Keywords: I don't think free isn't going to work.
Organization: Humber College Technology Dept.
Distribution: ont
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 17:24:08 GMT

I agree with Buddy who says it wouldn't be feasable for having a
Free-Unix Bulletin Board system, 
as a 'serious'
Unix BBs. But, There may Hold a possibility for a Unix-type Bill-board
and info-net system.-(as a poster advert type thing...)- 
Trouble is that the phone bills would get a little too stiff for
occasional netters. -(I guess!)-
My 1 cent worth.
*****************************************************************
*			Ack,					*
*		_    /| Pbthbt!   Bill says:                    *
*		\'o.O`	  / 					*
*		~(___)~		These are my opinions and no	*
*		   U	    one elses here at "Slumber Cottage" *
*****************************************************************
*kennedy@feline!lsuc!lsuc.on.CA					*
*CpyRght Savage Henrii Systems...				* 
*Sean Kennedy -(newuser.idiot!)- vox (705) 435-7475		* 
*R.R.#1 Egbert, Ontario, CANADA -(which includes Quebec.)-	*
*****************************************************************
From: bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce Becker)
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
Subject: Re: Pathalias question
Date: 6 Apr 92 19:40:59 GMT
Distribution: ont
Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario

In article <1992Apr6.132842.25227@zooid.guild.org> ross@zooid.UUCP (Ross Ridge) writes:
|clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) writes:
|>>I'm confused... why are people using smail 2.5 (and soon a 2.7) when
|>>smail 3.? is available ?
|>
|>Because smail 3.x is:
|>
|>	a) a different program altogether
|>	b) *enormous* (comparatively speaking)
|>	c) vast overkill for uucp-only sites.
|>
|>Smail's 2.x's big advantage is that it is very small and
|>very easy to install.  And does just what the small site
|>usually wants.
|
|The one big problem with smail 2.x is that's not very RFC 822 compliant
|and headers often escape unqualified.  In the past I've chosen smail 3.1
|over 2.5 because of this and other problems.  Here on ZOOiD we're using
|Zmailer, which for a UUCP site like us is even vaster overkill. Aside from
|being RFC 822 compliant, damit, we use it because it's also extreamly 
|configurable, it allows us do to things we'd have to hardcode into
|C with any other mailer.  Smail 2.x is fine mailer for small UUCP-only
|sites, but it's pretty limited and often leaves a fair bit to be
|desired.


	I'd appreciate it if you'd be a lot more
	specific as to what non-RFC-822 compliance
	there is in smail 2.5.  I'm not particularly
	aware of any, and since there may be a new
	release of smail 2.x, your comments might
	serve more than just idle curiosity.


	I run a not-so-small uucp site 8^), and for
	the most part I have been very satisfied with
	smail 2.5 - note that I've applied patches to
	extend its functionality to include mailing
	to programs and understand the "%" routing
	operator, etc. etc.


	I will probably go to smail 3.1.x when I
	install my ethernet however - I'm afraid to
	install zmailer since I'm told the SysV port
	relies on writing to /dev/kmem to implement
	its security features...


-- 
  ,u,	 Bruce Becker			Toronto, Ontario
a /i/	 Internet: bdb@becker.gts.org	Uucp: ...!lsuc!becker!bdb
 `\o\-e	 "James Brown, Mark Hosler, Al Jourgenson.
 _< /_	 			Coincidence or conspiracy?" - pashdown
From: evan@telly.on.ca (Evan Leibovitch)
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
Subject: Re: Pathalias question
Date: 8 Apr 92 12:24:04 GMT
Distribution: ont
Organization: Somewhere just far enough out of Toronto

In article <1992Apr6.132842.25227@zooid.guild.org>
	ross@zooid.UUCP (Ross Ridge) writes:

clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) writes:
>>I'm confused... why are people using smail 2.5 (and soon a 2.7) when
>>smail 3.? is available ?
>
>Because smail 3.x is:
>
>	a) a different program altogether
>	b) *enormous* (comparatively speaking)
>	c) vast overkill for uucp-only sites.

Has anyone here used the mail routing system shipped in SvsVr4 (ie,
"mailsurr")? Is either "smail" necessary on an R4 system?

-- 
 Evan Leibovitch, Sound Software Ltd., located in beautiful Brampton, Ontario
         evan@telly.on.ca / uunet!utzoo!telly!evan / (416) 452-0504
              If it's tourist season, why can't we shoot them?
From: bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce Becker)
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
Subject: Re: Pathalias question
Date: 9 Apr 92 21:41:55 GMT
Distribution: ont
Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario

In article <29E2E5E5.24F4@telly.on.ca> evan@telly.on.ca (Evan Leibovitch) writes:
|In article <1992Apr6.132842.25227@zooid.guild.org>
|	ross@zooid.UUCP (Ross Ridge) writes:
|
|clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) writes:
|>>I'm confused... why are people using smail 2.5 (and soon a 2.7) when
|>>smail 3.? is available ?
|>
|>Because smail 3.x is:
|>
|>	a) a different program altogether
|>	b) *enormous* (comparatively speaking)
|>	c) vast overkill for uucp-only sites.
|
|Has anyone here used the mail routing system shipped in SvsVr4 (ie,
|"mailsurr")? Is either "smail" necessary on an R4 system?


	Mailsurr has no uucp routing database
	facility, but it is easily added. The
	docs show how smail could be used for
	this (Appendix F of the System Admin.
	Guide). Smail 2.x must have been what
	they had in mind.


	The SysVr4 mailer is pretty nice - it
	is deceptively simple but it seems to
	be a reasonable mail system.  A rumor
	that a version of it may get released
	in source code is going around... 


-- 
  ,u,	 Bruce Becker			Toronto, Ontario
a /i/	 Internet: bdb@becker.gts.org	Uucp: ...!lsuc!becker!bdb
 `\o\-e	 "James Brown, Mark Hosler, Al Jourgenson.
 _< /_	 			Coincidence or conspiracy?" - pashdown
From: jjlawren@descartes.waterloo.edu (Jay Lawrence)
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
Subject: Re: Anyone running a for-pay Unix bulletin-board system?
Date: 6 Apr 92 21:17:51 GMT
Distribution: ont
Organization: University of Waterloo

In article <jYtQq*mm0@kink.UUCP> hugh@kink.UUCP (Hugh D. Gamble) writes:
>
>In article <jstewart.702312725@cunews>, John Stewart writes:
>
>> A Freenet would therefore be funded by the local government, perhaps with
>> additional contributions from other local organizations that make use of
>> the Freenet to distribute information.
>
>I've got a better idea.  Keep the @#$%ing govenrment out of it so the wrong
>people don't have to pay for it, and to keep everybody from paying too much
>for it.

I agree with what you are saying...quite often gov't involvement is conducive
to lack of care wrt spending, etc...I would say that a private individual(s)
would be much more interested in the success of their venture...

>>On a more practical note, anyone who has some kind of PC for accessing a
>public access site with, has most if not all of the hardware they need to
>run their own site.  There are scads of good folks both willing and able
>to provide technical assistance and teach them how to set up and run one.

Quite correct!  I have a meager 25Mhz-386 at home that I am going to (In
a fit of insanity) eventually open up to the general public in two forms..
one is a public access unix site and the other will be some form of BBS
type software for the bubblegum crowd.  ;-)  We'll see.  The weirdest thing
is that I have confidence in Linux with providing the OS base.  Seems pretty
stable right now...although I am fighting alot with the GNU cc...anyway call
me crazy, but I want to do it...

>And, at least in the civilized areas of Ontario (you know, with electricity
>and telephones :-) there are lots of small public access sites people can
>sign up to.

Yeh, I think that there is one here in waterloo, but I haven't talked with
him lately...

>Nothing is free and not all access is equal to a direct internet link.
>Anyone can have as much connectivity has they are willing to pay for,
>or get someone else to pay for in their behalf.

No, definately not!  I need more memory, hard drive, a T1000 (or 3000),
and a couple more phonelines...this costs lots of real dollars...but hey!
I figure it gives me more time to polish my skills before opening up for
real....I may also have to request stipends from my users...whether or not
they'll cough up is another story....oh and I guess there is some uunet
costs involved as well...not entirerly clear on that one...

>
>> John Stewart -- Computing and Communications Services, Carleton University
>> Internet: jstewart@ccs.carleton.ca or Mr.Canoehead@algonquin.carleton.ca  
>> "My Canada includes Quebec"
>
>
>-- 
># Hugh D. Gamble  UUCP: hugh@kink.UUCP  No Disclaimers.                       %
># For the UUCP impaired: hugh%kink@uunet.ca  voice: +1 416 267 6159           %
># "My Canada includes California."                                            %

"My Canada is a great country..."

(What is this rehetoric about the states???)
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
From: ross@zooid.guild.org (Ross Ridge)
Subject: Re: Pathalias question
Reply-To: ross@zooid.UUCP (Ross Ridge)
Organization: The Zoo of Ids
Distribution: ont
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 13:28:42 GMT

clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) writes:
>>I'm confused... why are people using smail 2.5 (and soon a 2.7) when
>>smail 3.? is available ?
>
>Because smail 3.x is:
>
>	a) a different program altogether
>	b) *enormous* (comparatively speaking)
>	c) vast overkill for uucp-only sites.
>
>Smail's 2.x's big advantage is that it is very small and
>very easy to install.  And does just what the small site
>usually wants.

The one big problem with smail 2.x is that's not very RFC 822 compliant
and headers often escape unqualified.  In the past I've chosen smail 3.1
over 2.5 because of this and other problems.  Here on ZOOiD we're using
Zmailer, which for a UUCP site like us is even vaster overkill. Aside from
being RFC 822 compliant, damit, we use it because it's also extreamly 
configurable, it allows us do to things we'd have to hardcode into
C with any other mailer.  Smail 2.x is fine mailer for small UUCP-only
sites, but it's pretty limited and often leaves a fair bit to be
desired.

							Ross Ridge
-- 
Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU					     l/	 //
								    [OO][oo]
ross@zooid.guild.org						    /()\/()/
uunet.ca!torag!zooid!ross					     db	 //
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
From: tg@utstat.uucp (Tom Glinos)
Subject: Re: Anyone running a for-pay Unix bulletin-board system?
Organization: University of Toronto, Dept. of Statistics
Distribution: ont
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 12:56:50 GMT

In article <88PPiB2w164w@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca> frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca (Steve Frampton) writes:
>jstewart@alfred.carleton.ca (John Stewart) writes:
>
>> Around 100 years ago the cost of publishing books dropped to the point and
>> the literacy rate rose to the point that the idea of a public library 
>> became feasible.  Today almost all communities have a public library.

>Who thought up this idea?!  You *really* think you're going to get 
>government to contribute?  NOT.

I agree with John. The costs are modest and fit the mandates of local
goverments and their libraries.
-- 
=================
"Life is so much more meaningful if you take the time to hunt down and strangle 
twits who post blather to inappropriate newsgroups." Henry Spencer
From: bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce Becker)
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
Subject: Re: Pathalias question
Date: 8 Apr 92 01:31:14 GMT
Distribution: ont
Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario

In article <1992Apr7.125701.5558@zooid.guild.org> ross@zooid.guild.org (Ross Ridge) writes:
>>|The one big problem with smail 2.x is that's not very RFC 822 compliant
>>|and headers often escape unqualified.
|
|bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce Becker) writes:
|>	I'd appreciate it if you'd be a lot more
|>	specific as to what non-RFC-822 compliance
|>	there is in smail 2.5.  I'm not particularly
|>	aware of any, and since there may be a new
|>	release of smail 2.x, your comments might
|>	serve more than just idle curiosity.
|
|Well basically the big problem I had was that if you sent a message
|and to a remore user "foo@bar.com" and a local one "ross", the local 
|address wouldn't get the local hostname appended to it.  Often some
|site further along the link would stick their own address there.


	I tried your example on my version of smail2.5,
	and it works correctly - the local host domain
	is indeed appended to the local hostname for
	the addressing case you mention.


	What I found was that in the "To:" line, the
	use of an address such as "user@system" would
	not be translated to "user@system.UUCP" (a
	dubious necessity in any case), but that
	"localuser" would be translated to
	"localuser@localsystem.localdomain".


-- 
  ,u,	 Bruce Becker			Toronto, Ontario
a /i/	 Internet: bdb@becker.gts.org	Uucp: ...!lsuc!becker!bdb
 `\o\-e	 "James Brown, Mark Hosler, Al Jourgenson.
 _< /_	 			Coincidence or conspiracy?" - pashdown
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
From: paul@moore.com (Paul Maclauchlan)
Subject: Re: Anyone running a for-pay Unix bulletin-board system?
Summary: "government sponsors"
Organization: Moore Corporation Limited, Toronto ON, Canada
Distribution: ont
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 92 23:15:49 GMT

In article <jstewart.702312725@cunews>, jstewart@alfred.carleton.ca (John Stewart) writes:
> In <1992Apr3.143146.8838@utstat.uucp> tg@utstat.uucp (Tom Glinos) writes:
> 
> >In article <jstewart.702306398@cunews> jstewart@alfred.carleton.ca (John Stewart) writes:
> >>
> >>Have you heard of the Freenet concept?  Examples would include the Cleveland
> A Freenet would therefore be funded by the local government, perhaps with
> additional contributions from other local organizations that make use of
> the Freenet to distribute information.

Just a point you should be reminded of, John.  Government (local or otherwise)
does not fund or support anything.  They solely distribute and allocate the
taxpayers' money.

I'd prefer they didn't spend mine subsidizing "the net".

-- 
.../Paul Maclauchlan
Moore Corporation Limited, Toronto, Ontario (416) 364-2600
paul@moore.com   -or-  {...!uunet.ca,...!telly}!moore!paul
"Sometimes it's like, someone took a knife, baby, edgy and dull,
 and cut a six inch valley through the middle of my soul."/BS'84
Newsgroups: ont.uucp
From: ross@zooid.guild.org (Ross Ridge)
Subject: Re: Pathalias question
Organization: The Zoo of Ids
Distribution: ont
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 12:57:01 GMT

>|The one big problem with smail 2.x is that's not very RFC 822 compliant
>|and headers often escape unqualified.

bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce Becker) writes:
>	I'd appreciate it if you'd be a lot more
>	specific as to what non-RFC-822 compliance
>	there is in smail 2.5.  I'm not particularly
>	aware of any, and since there may be a new
>	release of smail 2.x, your comments might
>	serve more than just idle curiosity.

Well basically the big problem I had was that if you sent a message
and to a remore user "foo@bar.com" and a local one "ross", the local 
address wouldn't get the local hostname appended to it.  Often some
site further along the link would stick their own address there.

>	I will probably go to smail 3.1.x when I
>	install my ethernet however - I'm afraid to
>	install zmailer since I'm told the SysV port
>	relies on writing to /dev/kmem to implement
>	its security features...

Well that's just in my port of it to Xenix.  But don't knock it, it works.

							Ross Ridge

-- 
Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU					     l/	 //
								    [OO][oo]
ross@zooid.guild.org						    /()\/()/
uunet.ca!torag!zooid!ross					     db	 //
Xref: sparky ont.general:713 ott.general:231
From: wania@aurora ( development)
Newsgroups: ont.general,ott.general
Subject: ROOM FOR RENT
Date: 15 Apr 92 13:36:45 GMT
Distribution: ont
Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada.


		Room for rent in Townhouse 

Room for rent by owner in a 3 bedroom townhouse in Kanata (Bridlewood). Few minutes from 417, and High Tech. Park. 

_ 4 appliances + microwave.
_ Fully furnished, except for the bedroom.
_ to share with 2 other professionals.
_ non-smokers
_ available May 1. 
_ $365/month Utilities included. 

Please Call Kevin @ 613-592-5702 (evenings) or leave message.
-- 
Xerxes Wania              | Usenet: wania@icpd.mitel.com 
MITEL Corporation         |         
360 Legget Drive, Kanata, | "Transatlantic call from Mr. Floyd 
Ontario, Canada K2K 1X3.  | to Mrs. Floyd are we reaching..."
Xref: sparky ont.general:667 tor.general:521 soc.culture.canada:3230
From: bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce Becker)
Newsgroups: ont.general,tor.general,soc.culture.canada
Subject: Re: If you can't be good, at least be moral...
Date: 8 Apr 92 06:23:57 GMT
Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario

In article <29D5FD43.4F31@telly.on.ca> evan@telly.on.ca (Evan Leibovitch) writes:
|The amount of self-rightheousness floating around Ontario politics,
|and Toronto politics especially, has gone from its usual level of
|absurdity to real stomach turning of late.
|[...]
|The ramifications go far beyond the Toronto city boundaries, because 
|it houses some of the only facilities in the entire "Golden Horseshoe"
|which could host such major events as operas and circuses. Toronto
|cultural events attact people from hundreds of kilometres away.
|
|Don't Toronto's local politicians have anything better to do?


	Hey, they're going to be asked to permit
	Politically Correct Jet Flights to the
	Island Airport so you can zip downtown in
	the shortest possible time from beautiful
	downtown Brampton - isn't that better?


giggle,
-- 
  ,u,	 Bruce Becker			Toronto, Ontario
a /i/	 Internet: bdb@becker.gts.org	Uucp: ...!lsuc!becker!bdb
 `\o\-e	 "James Brown, Mark Hosler, Al Jourgenson.
 _< /_	 			Coincidence or conspiracy?" - pashdown
Newsgroups: ont.general,can.general
From: marylou@bwdlh490.BNR.CA (MaryLou Rowe)
Subject: Re: Health warning: Bon Ami
Keywords: warning, addiction, bon ami
Reply-To: marylou@bwdlh490.BNR.CA (MaryLou Rowe)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 14:27:11 GMT

Ignore this article. It was posted on April Fool's Day. And seeing
as how the subject has never cropped up again in any media since then,
I would say that it's a good bet it's bogus.

Mary Lou Rowe   |My opinions are my own and do not reflect those of
BNR             |Bell-Northern Research.
P.O. Box 3511, Stn. C. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4H7
...!bnrgate!marylou%bwdlh490 MARYLOU@BNR.CA +1 613-765-4408 
Newsgroups: ont.general,wny.general,wny.wanted
From: abrodnik@watdragon.uwaterloo.ca (Andrej Brodnik (Andy))
Subject: Looking for residence
Organization: University of Waterloo
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 19:09:42 GMT

A friend of mine will start her studies in September at Baird Hall at SUNY at
Buffalo. She is looking for residence.  She is interested in either of three
possibilities:

	o to live with an older woman or couple
	o to rent a small (preferably furnished) apartment
	o to live with one or two female graduate students

Please respond by e-mail to me. Thanx in advance for your help or further
suggestions, 

Andrej
From: hal@nexus.yorku.ca (Harvey Haldorson)
Newsgroups: ont.general
Subject: Toronto --> Winnipeg airplane ticket*4 sale*
Summary: Airplane ticket for sale
Keywords: Air ticket plane
Date: 9 Apr 92 04:17:29 GMT
Distribution: ontario
Organization: York University


	*********************************************************
	*********************************************************
	****		Airplane Ticket for SALE             ****
	*********************************************************
	*********************************************************

		One way airfare for sale from Toronto to Winnipeg 
        	on April 16, 1992 (for female).  $150.00 firm

		call: (416) 650 9942
		email: hal@nexus.yorku.ca

   
Newsgroups: ont.for,sale,ont.general
From: bmacmill@epas.utoronto.ca (Bruce MacMillan)
Subject: Airline travel vouchers for sale
Organization: University of Toronto - EPAS
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 22:15:37 GMT


Newsgroups: ont.general
From: peter@dmntor.UUCP (Peter Emmenegger)
Subject: look'n for Moray's book on alternate energy 
Organization: Digital Media Networks
Distribution: ont
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 92 16:51:55 GMT


Newsgroups: tor.general
Distribution: ont
Subject: H. Moray's book on alternate energy sources

 	I'm looking for Henry Morary's book called "Alternate Energy sources"
	It was published sometime in the 50's and nobody seems to be able
	to get a hold of it.  The publisher is/was Cosray Research in Salt 
	Lake City, Utah. 


				peter@dmntor

Newsgroups: ont.general,can.general
From: lenny@bmerh174.BNR.CA (Len DePalma)
Subject: Re: Health warning: Bon Ami
Keywords: warning, addiction, bon ami
Reply-To: lenny@bnr.ca
Organization: BNR Ottawa, Fiber Systems Development
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 92 16:31:39 GMT


In article <1992Apr8.161048.24174@meadow.uucp>, marc@meadow.uucp (Marc
Riehm) writes:
|> p.s. What was the date on the original article?

***APRIL 1st***, need we say more?  (ie: April ***FOOLS*** day)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNET: lenny@bnr.ca       Any opinions expressed above are mine.
Newsgroups: ont.general,can.general