HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ngsippel@miavx3.mid.muohio.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: The Ren And Stimpy Update
Date: 27 Dec 92 04:16:02 GMT
Organization: Watch Ren And Stimpy or Else!

Hello all and Happy Holidays!

I hope you all had a merry Christmas/Hannakah (please forgive spelling)
and got everything you wanted.  I didn't, so I went to the mall and bought
Stimpy for my own Christmas gift (plush one, no sounds) and my family bought
Ren for me for my birthday (which is in 8 months :( ).  Well, at least I got
both R&S!  JOY!!

I was really sad to see that Nick replayed Sven Hoek once again..I was really
hoping for the Christmas or a new show, but Nick has a bunch of Scrooges
for employees (especially censors)!  I want R&S to have Christmas in December,
not in January!  Please play it Nickelodeon!!

After tomorrow, we won't see anymore R&S until after the holidays. :(  I 
was wondering...Micheal Pataki (George Liquor) has credits in shows of
In The Army/Big House Blues and Sven Hoek; Which characters did he play in 
these?  Deadline for FAQ questions is January 6, 1992; I plan on releasing
the new (and approved by FAQ censors on the UseNet) for January 13.  The 
episode guide will be posted along with this.  I am looking forward to keep
the FAQ for 1993 and posting more often than I have been--I apologize for this.

Have a looney R&S new year!!

      .    _  .     _____________ 
      |\_|/__/|    /             \ 
     / / \/ \  \  / Happy! Happy! \      
    /__|O||O|__ \ \   Joy! Joy!   / 
   |/_ \_/\_/ _\ | \  ___________/      
   | | (____) | ||  |/                       
   \/\___/\__/  // _/
   (_/         ||   
    |          ||\   Norman Sippel alias Norman "Shawn" Stimpy
     \        //_/   
      \______//             ngsippel@miavx3.mid.muohio.edu
     __|| __||       Email: ngsippel@miavx2.ham.muohio.edu
    (____(____)             ngsippel@komodo.ham.muohio.edu
From: drosera@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Donald Burden)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Baby Scam
Date: 3 Jan 1993 04:41:21 GMT
Organization: /etc/organization
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu

I just finished watching Saturday night's Ren and Stimpy show.  It was a 
repeat of Dog Show, but it was paired with Ren's Toothache.  When Dog Show
was on a few weeks ago, it was paired with Baby Scam.  It now looks as if
we can add another never-to-be-seen-anymore episode to the growing list of
banned episodes that Prick-a-lodean has taken upon itself to banish forever.
What a bunch of worthless spineless creeps at the network who made the 
decision to ban these episodes!  I'll make my own decision on what I want to 
watch, thank you!
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: dvandom@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Dave Van Domelen)
Subject: Praise Nick <ducks quickly to avoid hail of bullets>
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 03:40:55 GMT

Yes, I actually am glad they did reruns over break.  Why?  Because my parents 
forgot to tape over Thanksgiving, so I was missing Haunted House/Mad Dog Hoek, 
and they had started late on Sven Hoek, so I was missing the Log ad, all of 
which I now have on tape!  Haahahaahaha!
     Oh, BTW, "Rahne and Simpy" appear in the first two pages of X-Factor this 
month, with the song "Mutant Mutant Angst Angst!"
     Dave Van Domelen, "fish eggs..."
From: rhaller@ns.uoregon.edu (Rich Haller)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Re: SVEN HOEK
Followup-To: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Date: 23 Dec 1992 18:13:44 GMT
Organization: University of Oregon
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: rhaller.cc.uoregon.edu

In article <7qg6VB1w165w@toz.buffalo.ny.us>, atro@toz.buffalo.ny.us
(Atrosity) wrote:
> 
> Someone earlier mentioned cathing an R&S episode about Ren's cousin 
> playing Don't Wizz On The Electric Fence with Stimpy.  The name of the 
> episode, as the subject may implie, is Sven Hoek.  
> I have to say that that was  the best one I've seen.

I have to agree. This is the kind of episode that I really like. I was
disappointed with 'In the Army', though some people liked it. DW had me
rolling in the aisles.  I particularly liked the animation of Ren. He
doesn't have to say anything to make me laugh. Just looking at his face is
enough.

--------------------
> atro@toz.buffalo.ny.us (Atrosity)
> -- Change this!

-Rich Haller <rhaller@ns.uoregon.edu>   University of Oregon, Eugene, OR,
USA
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Re: New episode?  Sunday morning Nick and disgusting cartoon!  Yeah!
From: ngsippel@miavx3.mid.muohio.edu
Date: 24 Dec 92 10:11:28 EST
Organization: Watch Ren And Stimpy or Else!

In article <1992Dec21.210404.696@nmt.edu>, ewagoner@nmt.edu (A Hoopy Frood Who Always Knows Where His Towel Is) writes:
> In article <1992Dec20.173350.19572@news.cs.indiana.edu> "Amy Young Leith" <alyoung@kiwi.ucs.indiana.edu> spouts:
>>
>> Praise for 'Sven Hoek' deleted . . .
>>
> Amy --- Second Season, Post-firing, still old crew . . .
> 
> Speaking of new episodes, I was watching bugs bunny on Nick Friday,
> and they had a promo for SNICK.
> This promo was spouting off all sorts of propaganda for last Saturday's
> lineup, and the theme was christmas. . . Christmas Clarissa, Roundhouse,
> Are you afraid, and REN AND STIMPY. It even showed clips of Stimpy running
> around in a red santa hat, ren at a tree, etc. The screen shouted in big
> letters 'NEW EPISODE!!!!'
> 
> Knowing I was to be gone Sat night, I set my VCR to tape it.
> 
> I got hope, all eager and all, pressed 'play', and . . .
> 
> Haunted House? Mad Dog Hoek? Hmmmmm.
> 
> Did any one else see these promos? Does anyone else watch Nick for anything
> other than R&S? Did anyone actually see an X-mas R&S?
> 
> Just courious. Was wonderin' if good ol' Nick was guilty of some sort of
> false advertising . . .
>
> 

Hang Nick!  I saw those ads too and was disappointed!  Boo to Nick For False
Advertising!

Norman


      .    _  .     _____________ 
      |\_|/__/|    /             \ 
     / / \/ \  \  / Happy! Happy! \      
    /__|O||O|__ \ \   Joy! Joy!   / 
   |/_ \_/\_/ _\ | \  ___________/      
   | | (____) | ||  |/                       
   \/\___/\__/  // _/
   (_/         ||   
    |          ||\   Norman Sippel alias Norman "Shawn" Stimpy
     \        //_/   
      \______//             ngsippel@miavx3.mid.muohio.edu
     __|| __||       Email: ngsippel@miavx2.ham.muohio.edu
    (____(____)             ngsippel@komodo.ham.muohio.edu
From: ketler@sklib.usask.ca
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: need r & s episodes
Date: 21 DEC 92 19:25:21 GMT
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
NNTP-Posting-Host: sklib.usask.ca

Can the person (Judex? King Rhoton?) who is making the Ren & Stimpy tapes please e-mail me details.  (Can't find their e-mail address.)  Much appreciated.

Desiree
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Re: SVEN HOEK
From: ngsippel@miavx3.mid.muohio.edu
Date: 24 Dec 92 10:01:30 EST
Organization: Watch Ren And Stimpy or Else!

In article <7qg6VB1w165w@toz.buffalo.ny.us>, atro@toz.buffalo.ny.us (Atrosity) writes:
> Someone earlier mentioned cathing an R&S episode about Ren's cousin 
> playing Don't Wizz On The Electric Fence with Stimpy.  The name of the 
> episode, as the subject may implie, is Sven Hoek.  
> I have to say that that was  the best one I've seen.  At least in a 
> Loooong time. Of course, there was the Haunted House, and we can't forget 
> the flying butt pliers either.  Ok, it was one of the best, including the 
> most recent "Dog Show".
> Has anyone noticed that since John K. is gone, Nick decided to release 
> all the ruder episodes of R&S.  I guess even censors have a sense of 
> humor.  Thumbs up to Nick.  Hope they keep comin'!
> 
> Atrosity
> `/s
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> atro@toz.buffalo.ny.us (Atrosity)
> -- Change this!

Yes, but it's too late to save John K.

Bad Holidays To Nick!
Merry Christmas and Holidays To You All On Alt.Tv.Ren-n-Stimpy!!

Norman

      .    _  .     _____________ 
      |\_|/__/|    /             \ 
     / / \/ \  \  / Happy! Happy! \      
    /__|O||O|__ \ \   Joy! Joy!   / 
   |/_ \_/\_/ _\ | \  ___________/      
   | | (____) | ||  |/                       
   \/\___/\__/  // _/
   (_/         ||   
    |          ||\   Norman Sippel alias Norman "Shawn" Stimpy
     \        //_/   
      \______//             ngsippel@miavx3.mid.muohio.edu
     __|| __||       Email: ngsippel@miavx2.ham.muohio.edu
    (____(____)             ngsippel@komodo.ham.muohio.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: get a life---PLEASE!!!!
From: nerak8@UMSLVMA.UMSL.EDU
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 92 12:30:53 CST
Organization: UM ST. LOUIS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.124.1.2

you people need to get a life, i too love the old r&s but they are
GONE, get over it and get on with your life. with all the troubles
that our nation is facing right now over seas it seems like all this
negative energy should be redirected in a more positive direction!!!!
 
have a merry christmas if you can get over the deaths of R&S!!!!!
From: jdavis@bordeaux.kpno.noao.edu (Jim Davis)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
Subject: Re: You Sure Can Tell
Date: 22 Dec 92 01:01:43 GMT
Organization: Thomas Tupper Jr. High

In article <92356.31506.L616015@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM> L616015@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM writes:
>    Based on the traffic on the board over the weekend, and no whining about
>Sat. night repeat, I can only assume that school's out.

Maybe... but not all of us are in school, so _I'll_ start whining!

Does anyone know what happened to the new episode that (apparently) was
first scheduled for Saturday?  The SNICK ads first showed snippets with Santa
in them (on Thursday, as I recall), and by Friday (I think) they were
superimposing a big "BRAND NEW" over one snippet.

But along comes Saturday evening and it's... Haunted House and Mad Dog Hoek
again.

Particularly weird since the Santa bit would seem to be pretty topical.  As
in, it would kinda make more sense to show it _before_ Christmas!

(I was going to include an 8000 line ASCII Ren & Stimpy .sig, but I thought
better of it.)
-- 
Jim Davis            | "How am I going to get _you_ a date, EVER?!"
jdavis@noao.edu      |   -- Clarissa Darling
Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: donnell@tuna.micro.umn.edu (BogusMan)
Subject: Re: get a life---PLEASE!!!!
Organization: none
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 18:23:00 GMT

In article <168C7AFFD.S863508@UMSLVMA.UMSL.EDU> nerak8@UMSLVMA.UMSL.EDU writes:
>you people need to get a life, i too love the old r&s but they are
>GONE, get over it and get on with your life. with all the troubles
>that our nation is facing right now over seas it seems like all this
>negative energy should be redirected in a more positive direction!!!!
> 
>have a merry christmas if you can get over the deaths of R&S!!!!!
> 
> 
> 

And the Politically correct award goes to:
THIS GUY!
Pax
					--Judex--
<As for PC: Never had it, never will.

Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: donnell@seahorse.micro.umn.edu (BogusMan)
Subject: Re: Baby Scam
Organization: none
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 18:14:23 GMT

In article <1i5qphINNej9@life.ai.mit.edu> drosera@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Donald Burden) writes:
>I just finished watching Saturday night's Ren and Stimpy show.  It was a 
>repeat of Dog Show, but it was paired with Ren's Toothache.  When Dog Show
>was on a few weeks ago, it was paired with Baby Scam.  It now looks as if
>we can add another never-to-be-seen-anymore episode to the growing list of
>banned episodes that Prick-a-lodean has taken upon itself to banish forever.
>What a bunch of worthless spineless creeps at the network who made the 
>decision to ban these episodes!  I'll make my own decision on what I want to 
>watch, thank you!




If you look at the first season, you will see that they cut and paste
shows together for filler. Since "BBS" was only on about 3 weeks ago,
they probably just pasted two together. I doubt they have banned anything.
Geez, "Dog show" is one of the episodes that got John K. fired and 
they show that. I think your judgement is a little premature.
Wait and see...
Pax
					--Judex--

Newsgroups: alt.tv.ren-n-stimpy
From: phz@cadence.com (Pete Zakel)
Subject: Re: Ren & Stimpy Comics for sale
Organization: Cadence Design Systems
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 02:31:16 GMT

>           One more thing ... where you gonna get one ... here in Northern
>           California ... You can't find one anywhere ... I have check 4 comic
>           book places ... 2 others had them for $10.00 each.

Well, you can find them, they just keep selling out.

My wonderful step-daughter found issues 2&3 and gave them to me for Christmas.
She couldn't find issue 1 though, and she looked!

My even more wonderful wife got me Ren and Stimpy plush toys (made by Dakin)
for Christmas (no, they don't fart, but I love them despite their faults!).

Happy, Happy, Toy, Toy!

-Pete Zakel
 (phz@cadence.com or ..!uunet!cadence!phz)

"Contrariwise", continued Tweedledee, "If it was so, it might be; and if
it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. Thats logic."
- Lewis Carroll
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
From: dorff@granite.ma30.bull.com (Laurie A. Dorff)
Subject: Re: NBC and WHBZ
Organization: Bull HN Informations Systems Inc.
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 14:24:51 GMT

Hi!

I live in the Boston area also.  Channels 4 & 10 are local
NBC stations - non-Cable.  LA Law is on these channels at 
10pm on Thursdays.  The local ABC stations are channels 5,
9, and 12.  The local CBS station is channel 7.

I don't know about the other station you mentioned.....
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
From: amo@cbnews.cb.att.com (arlene.m.osborne)
Subject: Re: Sheila Kelley -- previous work
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 19:52:41 GMT

In article <1992Dec24.064924.29329@news.columbia.edu>, gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare) writes:
> (electronic news gathering).  She's probably Canadian or a dual
> citizen by birth, as work visas are pretty tight for Canada as in


Did you see her recently on the Tonight Show?  What a ditz!  I
couldn't believe it!  Fortunately, she CAN act..


She mentioned where she was from...."back East" I think she said
and then later I think she may have even said which state...she
is American.

Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
From: fate@eskimo.com (Craig Stykel)
Subject: Re: Stalker Stuff Re: I missed it! (Spoilers for 12/17 episode)
Organization: -> ESKIMO NORTH (206) For-Ever <-
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 08:36:08 GMT

skitchen@pilot.njin.net (Sco3tt Kitchen) writes:
> There are spoilers and leaps of logic ahead, so, like, consider
> yourselves warned...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> In article <1gtausINNb4k@gap.caltech.edu> roder@cco.caltech.edu
(Brenda J. Roder) writes:
> 
> > Stalker:  no resolution yet.  no more presents.  Gwen accused Daniel
and he
> > denied it plus Rox was telling her it couldn't be him because he is
such a 
> > good father and so on.
> > 
> 
> I disagree on this assessment.  I think they're approaching a
> resolution for the stalker thread.  When Gwen first started receiving
> presents anonymously, I had no clue as to what was going on.  When she
> received the heart, I tried to make a leap of logic about who would
> dislike Gwen that much.  The first person who came to mind was our old
> friend, Mr. Kittredge.
> 
> Having seen the episode on 12/17, I have formed a new opinion.  I
> think it's Romney, the guy who opposed Brackman and sent him to jail.
> First, the ring (a diamond no less -- or so he claims).  Then when he
> dressed up as Santa to fool Gwen into kissing him.  I think he's
> trying to set up Morales as a fall guy to get Gwen for his very own.
> 
> Any opinions?
> 
> Scott
> -- 
> Scott Kitchen  |  Net.handsome.lug  |  ICBM: 40.88 N  74.56 W
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kitman's Law: Pure drivel tends to drive away ordinary drivel.
I don't think he was there to get him to kiss him...
She thought it was the Morales guy, cause of the santa role, but
Kitteredge is a logical choice...
I think  Romney is just a loser who is trying reach beyond himself
to try for something he will never get... but oh, well...
It was a certain set up on Morales, to be sure, but I can't get
clues to who is responsible..
>
************************************************************************
******** B E W A R E  T H E  B L A D E  O F  T H E  N I N J A ********
**********************************************************************
***********************fate@eskimo.com********************************
**********************************************************************
From: pdpotter@vaxa.weeg.uiowa.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
Subject: oops
Date: 21 Dec 92 15:39:09 GMT
Reply-To: pdpotter@vaxa.weeg.uiowa.edu
Organization: U. of Iowa - Weeg Computing Center

I see I forgot to mention in the body of my last message that I was referring
to starting a newsgroup for law'n'order.  Sorry.
From: cho@ucbeh.san.uc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
Subject: Happy New Year!
Date: 31 Dec 92 14:36:12 EST
Distribution: world
Organization: Univ. of Cincinnati

Greetings all you millions of LA Law fans!  :-)

I finally got to see an episode of Law and Order. It IS a good show. I noticed
that Roxannes' ex husband is one of the main characters in it.  It is
definitely a 'darker' show than LAL, but it does have the law cases as a major
part of the show at least.

When I went home for Christmas, I asked my rather large family if everyone was
as disgusted about LAL as I was, and they all whole heartedly agreed.  Of
course, then my next question was 'Well, OK, who is stalking Gwen?', and
everyone just laughed.  After admitting to my LAL addiction, most of the family
members think it's Martinez, which still seems crazy to me.  They think he is
one of those 'quiet' but dangerous types.  I think it's the dog.  :-)

Does anyone know when this gets resolved?  Does anyone have a TV guide episode
listing that will say, or will this go on all year long?  

-Pamela Cho-
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
From: jefrank@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Jason E Frank)
Subject: Christmas Stupidity (spoilers)
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 15:41:26 GMT

  According to this week's T.V. Guide, the episode they're re-running
this week is the one with Susan Bloom's wedding (and Rox calling it quits
with Arnie).  Considering that they ALREADY re-ran this episode, and that
there are a number of episodes from that season they didn't rerun, AND that
it's Christmas eve, can anyone come up with any possible explanation as to
why they wouldn't choose to rerun last season's Xmas episode (I know it 
was far less upbeat than usual, but I found it very moving--between Roz'
"re-appearance", CJ's testifying in the custody battle of her female ex-
lover, etc)?  
--jason
From: mcsweinberg@memstvx1.memst.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
Subject: Kelley Singles?
Date: 31 Dec 92 20:51:14 -0600
Organization: Memphis State University

Was I hallucenating (sp?) or was that Sheila Kelly in "Singles"... with a Jill
Eikenberry like Henna Hair mistake?


Rai.
______________________________________________________________________________
"Damn, I wish I was your lover,                          R A I
I'd rock you till the daylight comes                Raina Weinberg
make sure you are smiling and warm,          _Memphis State University_
I am everything tonight I'll be your              Memphis, Tn USA
mother do such things to ease your pain
free your mind and you won't be the         MCSWEINBERG@MSUVX1.MEMST.EDU
same."   Sophie B. Hawkins
______________________________________________________________________________

Xref: sparky alt.tv.la-law:880 misc.legal:21627
From: tjc50@juts.ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law,misc.legal
Subject: misc.legal (was: law'n'order group)
Date: 21 Dec 92 23:44:26 GMT
Reply-To: tjc50@juts.ccc.amdahl.com (Terry Carroll)
Organization: Amdahl Corporation

In article <1992Dec21.150026.14602@news.weeg.uiowa.edu>, 
pdpotter@vaxa.weeg.uiowa.edu writes:
> Can anyone tell me how to start (or request) a new newsgroup?  I think
> that the issues brought up on each episode would generate lots of 
> interesting discussion.

Bring it up in misc.legal.  Many substantial topics have been discussed there 
that owe their origin to an episode of a ficticious show.  There's no 
discrimination based on the origin of the question, and there are some well-
schooled people who read and respond, including at least three lawyers, and 
four law students.

Terry Carroll - tjc50@juts.ccc.amdahl.com - 408/992-2152
The opinions presented above are not necessarily those of a sound mind.
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
From: jam+@cs.cmu.edu (Joe Mattis)
Subject: Re: 12/17 episode
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:47:47 GMT

In article <1992Dec19.072341.15887@rose.com> raymond.hodgson@rose.com (raymond hodgson) writes:
>
> Mike Doel (doel@bae.bellcore.com) writes:
> D(> 4) The writers pretty clearly stated their opinion on the LA Riots
> D(> when they had Stuart admit he was part of the cause.  [But in what way?]
>
>        I think it was because Stuart's job is to help rich people get
>        away with paying as little tax as possible.  He thought that if
>        more money was spent on providing services to poorer areas, they
>        would not want to riot.

I totally agree with this assessment...Stuart felt responsible for being part
of The System that enables the "haves" to exploit the "have-nots" without
supporting them at all.

-Joe Mattis    ARPA:  jam@isl1.ri.cmu.edu
               UUCP:  ...!ucbvax!isl1.ri.cmu.edu!jam@ucbvax.berkeley.edu

"With.  Without.
 And who'll deny that's what the fighting's all about?"
                                 - Pink Floyd, "Us and Them", DSOTM
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
From: jtaylor@ms.uky.edu (Jeff Taylor)
Subject: Recycled Actors (was: A Martinez as Hector) 
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 15:23:19 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

With all the talk of A Martinez being recycled from Hector and 
other people first appearing as one character and then as another,
this brings up a question I asked a long while back, but never got 
an answer.  Recall when Douglas was the judge in the earlier episodes,
and he had an affair with the husky blonde baliff.  *I* say, later on
in the next season perhaps, that same actress was recycled into the 
lady who had a hysterectomy and lost sensation in a sexual way (Victor
was the attorney and accused the doctor of "running a hysterectomy farm")
a friend claims this lady is not the same actress ... any ideas who  is
correct?  Thanks.

-- 
                                  Jeff Taylor
             main :         jltaylor@ucs.indiana.edu
        alternate :   jtaylor@ms.uky.edu,  jeff@ukpr.uky.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
From: yfchyan@athena.mit.edu (Yih-Feng Chyan)
Subject: NBC and WHBZ
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 16:34:54 GMT

Hi,

I am new to Boston.  In our cable TV here, they don't have any channel for the
three national TV networks, NBC, CBS and ABC.  Is this situation common
nation-wide?  Here I watch L.A. Law on WHBZ (channel 4) and on Lifetime for rerun.
So is there any relation between WHBZ and NBC? (like is WHBZ a local TV station
for NBC? etc.)  Also, how many times a week does Lifetime rerun the L.A. Law?  I
think I happened to see it once on Monday 8pm and once on Thursday 8pm.  Is it
all?  Any episodes at other times?


Happy holidays!


M.-J.

Newsgroups: alt.tv.la-law
From: pdpotter@vaxa.weeg.uiowa.edu
Subject: law'n'order group
Reply-To: pdpotter@vaxa.weeg.uiowa.edu
Organization: U. of Iowa - Weeg Computing Center
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:00:26 GMT

Can anyone tell me how to start (or request) a new newsgroup?  I think
that the issues brought up on each episode would generate lots of interesting
discussion.

Respond to pdpotter@uiowa.edu

Thanks.
Xref: sparky alt.tv.la-law:878 rec.arts.tv:24374