From: an3814@anon.penet.fi
Subject:  Mr. Bannerjee's Reply
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.pakistan
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 19:08:05 GMT

X-Anon-To: soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.pakistan

After contacting with the server at Finland, Mr. Bannerjee feels comfortable t
hat he is not going to disclose the identity of an3925.  However, he seems not
 to appreciate the fact that the postings of an3925 (alias Samit Bannerjee)
contains the material which is dangerous to the religious harmony between
Hindus and Muslims and to Indian and Pakistani Nationals.  Hence, the server
at the Finland could overrule his policy of not disclosing the identification
of the anonymous user.

His arguements that anybody can copy his sig file and post an article seems
to make sense.  But there are some questions need to answered.  Firstly, when
this posting was first published, why he did not reply to that user (Dont tell
 us that you did not notice or you ignore such articles.  Remember an article 
was posted with your sig file and you immediately replied back).  Secondly,
if someone else had done it to defame you, why he stopped posting now.

He said that he did not have any moral or ethical responsibilty to prove his
innocence.  Well, when one does not have any morals or ethics, how would he
feel any responsibilty (Proof: Please read the articles posted by an3925, no
person with a little bit of ethics could write such stuff. Also please read
his replies to Mr. Ibrahim which depict very well how much moral obligations 
he has).

Ref to his reply to point out that he has annonymous id no an4404 which is
different from an3925.  Firstly, could you please prove that it is your
personal id or some of your friend's?  Secondly, it is possible to have 
more than one account for an individual (I myself has more than 4 accounts
on different machines).  Hence this arguement also does not prove your
innocence.

At the end, I must tell you that my intention to describe about your 
hypocracy was to make you realize that it is not always possible to hide
oneself and play a game against others.  Since, there are people smarter
than you who could easily turn table against you.  I never had and still
dont have any intention to demand any appology from you (since I am not
Chatterjee and I believe in freedom of expression) since personally I
am not offended by your posting.  I hope you get the message.

I must also tell you that if ever someone proves (or if I, myself, find out)
that those articles were not posted by you, I will post an unconditional
appology for causing any defame to you.  The only reason why I remain
anonymous is that I want you (if you are innocent !!) or some neutral 
reader to disclose my ID and then I will ask him/her to use the same
method to disclose the identification of an3925.

Regards,

PS. Sorry for using a B word for Mr. Bannerjee.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian