HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jdeitch@umiami.ir.miami.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: 10 Forward windows...
Date: 17 Apr 92 18:17:36 GMT
Organization: Univ of Miami IR

judy.ranelli@matrix.sbs.com (Judy Ranelli)  writes:

> -> Gee, Mike, I hope you never have to transport claustrophobic whales.
> -> As a rule, I generally like to have windows, too.
> ->
> -> Besides, Kirk & co. couldn't have looked at them in the holding tank
> -> if it had been made of steel.
> 
> But here's another YATI: Whales have to BREATHE. How could they in a
> tank full of water? They didn't mention "breathing space".

I think the top of the tank was open.  After all, the whales DID escape when
Kirk pulled the door release after they 'landed' in SF Bay.  If not, then I
believe whales are capable of holding their breath for quite a while.  But,
in this case, how did the whales get free ?

- Jonathan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet : jdeitch@umiami.miami.edu | Go Braves !! | "I hate it when I can't
---------------------------------------------------| trust my own technology !" 
"Thrills!  Chills!  Magic!  Prizes!"  -- Hurricane |    -- Geordi LaForge

Gene Roddenberry, Isaac Asimov, Jim Henson, Dr Seuss, Mel Blanc ... Sigh ... 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch)
Subject: Re: question about where silence has lease.
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 20:03:54 GMT

mudcr@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (David C Roller) writes:

>When I first saw the Episode Where silence has lease I was under the
>impression that the title was called where Science has lease.  My
>problem is I understood the meaning of the mistitled one.  Because of
>the scientific experimenting superior attitude of Nagilum.
>I have no idea what the actual title signifies.

No help there, I'm afraid, but I'd like to point out something I said when
the thing first aired years and years ago.

"Nagilum", as a name, bears a rather strong similarity, IMO, to "Naglfar", 
which in Norse mythology is the ship made of dead men's nails that carries the
hordes of Hel to Ragnarok.

Considering Nagilum's great interest in death, there may be a reason for 
that similarity.  

Or maybe not; but it's an interesting thought.  :-)

Tim Lynch
From: intertxt@network.ucsd.edu (Jason Snell)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Really bad TNG episodes (was Re: 3 more reviews)
Date: 15 Apr 1992 19:03:15 -0700
Organization: University of California, San Diego
NNTP-Posting-Host: network.ucsd.edu

In article <1992Apr16.002347.23394@cco.caltech.edu> tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch) writes:
>mary@wheat-chex.ai.mit.edu (Mary S. Lee) writes:
>>>In article <1992Apr15.154206.8369@cco.caltech.edu> tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch) writes:
>
>>>>Oh, no. I've got several that fall below this, "Qpid" and "The Royale" being
>>>>the top (bottom? :-) ) of the list. This is easily in the bottom 10, though,
>>>>and probably the bottom five.  
>>>
>>On the
>>other hand, I can't recall *anyone* saying they liked "Justice."  Therefore
>>"Justice" may be a better candidate for worst episode, as it appears to be
>>almost universally disliked.  [Uh oh, visions of hundreds of irritated
>>"Justice" fans frantically typing at their keyboards...]
>
>Janis Cortese among them, if I remember rightly.  I think she's defended it
>on occasion.
>
>If we want to gauge "badness" by sheer unpopularity, then Jason Snell 

At this point, I was filled with fear... but then...

>ought to 
>be able to fill us in with the last poll results on the bottom ten.  (If I
>remember that one right, "The Loss" was the least favorite, with "Qpid" and
>"The Royale" *and* "Justice" all in the bottom 10.)

Qpid, the Royale, Justice, and The Loss (and Atsushi's beloved "Lonely Among
Us") all placed in the top 10 worst shows. But they weren't #1...

For those interested, here were those results. I do this poll each fall,
after people come back from school.

TOP TEN TNG EPISODES:
10. "Redemption I" (Fourth Season) (1 First-place vote)
8. (Tie) "Family" (Fourth Season) (0)
8. (Tie) "Reunion" (Fourth Season) (0) (1 First-place vote)
6. (Tie) "Remember Me" (Fourth Season) (0)
6. (Tie) "The Defector" (Third Season) (0)
5. "The Mind's Eye" (Fourth Season) (1)
4. "Q Who" (Second Season) (2)
3. "The Measure of a Man" (Second Season) (3)
2. "The Best of Both Worlds I" (Third Season) (6)
1. "Yesterday's Enterprise" (Third Season) (9)          


POLL OF HATE: The ten worst shows.
10. "The Child" (Second Season)
 9. "Code of Honor" (First Season)
       The one I hate the most. Also placed ninth in hate last year.
 8. "Devil's Due" (Fourth Season)
 6. (tie) "The Loss" (Fourth Season)
 6. (tie) "Manhunt" (Second Season)
 5. "Lonely Among Us" (First Season)
 4. "The Royale" (Second Season)
 3. "Justice" (First Season)
 2. "Q-pid" (Fourth Season)
 1. "Shades of Gray" (Second Season)

As I said at the time, "Shades of Gray" is the best argument ever for
season-ending cliffhangers... :)

-Jason

-- 
         Jason Snell / jsnell@ucsd.edu / Editor, InterText Magazine
   For subscription (ASCII/PostScript)/submission information, mail me!
  "I don't want you to think we're... _Video Watchdog_ people who worship
    obscure French sadomasochistic movies or anything." - Joel Hodgson
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: jewison@aurora.physics.utoronto.ca (Mike Jewison)
Subject: Star Trek 25th Anniv Game question [mild spoilers]
Followup-To: jewison@centaur.astro.utoronto.ca
Keywords: Scenario 2
Organization: University of Toronto Dept. of Astronomy
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 14:07:20 GMT

I have just successfully completed scenario 2 of the Star Trek 25th
Anniversary Game ("Hijacked") and have a question about it.  But, as there
may be spoilers present for some we first enter a ^L:










and in case our mailer eats the ^L, (as has been known to happen) a number of
lines of blank space:



















During the last phase, when you enter the bridge, I have been unsuccessful in
stunning the three Elasi guards without getting my security guard killed.
[I've been going in through the door rather than using the transporter.]
As a result, the maximum score I've been able to obtain is around 66% with
one commendation point. On the other hand, I score 94% and 3 pts on
scenario 1.

Does anyone have any suggestions as to (a) how to get through the last part of
the scenario without getting the guard killed, and (b) what other things can
be done during the scenario to improve my score?  [For your information, I'm
running the game on a 25MHz 386-clone.]

Please respond by email.  I won't post the results (due to the sensitive nature
of this thread), but if anyone wants a summary I'll be happy to mail it to
them.

- Mike Jewison
  David Dunlap Observatory
  University of Toronto
  jewison@centaur.astro.utoronto.ca

     *** DISCLAIMER:  I'm not an astronomer, but I play one on TV. ***
From: bob@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU (robert s. richardson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Occurance of 18 in ST: TNG
Date: 11 Apr 92 02:11:13 GMT
Organization: CS Dept. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

But remember, by an amazing coincidence:  18 * 2.333 (repeating) = 42

Does anyone have a question for this?

| Bob Richardson     (or, for you UNIX buffs: bob@jacobs.cs.orst.edu) |
| 218 NW 21st #2           Corvallis, OR  97330          503-758-5018 |
| __            						      |
| \/   WI- GR+ F++ ST* GL- SC++ MU& WH WE& SF+ YA++ SN- NU-- SW- SR+  |
From: vendwrt@iddsupp5.austin.ibm.com (Vendor Writer Guest Login)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: What would YOU like to see a Galaxy class ship named?
Date: 9 Apr 92 17:07:28 GMT
Reply-To: vendwrt@iddsupp5.austin.ibm.com (Vendor Writer Guest Login)
Organization: IBM Austin, TX

Hopefully this will go to the bottom where it belongs. I am a novice
user with no guidence from a SYSAD.
> Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
> Path: awdprime.austin.ibm.com!auschs!panews!uunet!uunet!meaddata!gordon
> From: gordon@meaddata.com (Gordon Edwards)
> Subject: Re: What would YOU like to see a Galaxy class ship named?
> References: <1992Mar20.114516.1@vaxb.acs.unt.edu>
<4LiDiB2w164w@batpad.lgb.CA.US>
<1992Mar31.185743.10479@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu>
<1992Apr3.212257.9152@nevada.edu>
> Sender: news@meaddata.com (Usenet Administrator)
> Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 13:52:45 GMT
> Message-ID: <1992Apr6.135245.1033@meaddata.com>
> Lines: 47
> 
> |>   I think any ship that has the Enterprise as a sister ship needs a good
> |> solid name, like 
> |> 
> |>   USS Indestructible  (Seeing how the Yamato already bit it, and alot of
> |> 		       Consitutions bought it in TOS, "Enterprise" is
> |> 		       cursed!  :)
> |> 
> |>   As for the "shuttle" Enterprise not being shown in Picard's wall - two
> |> 
> |>   1 : It isn't (wasn't) a real shuttle.  More a lifting body testbed.
> |>   2 : It would make a _nasty_ circular reference.  The "shuttle"
> |>       Enterprise was not named after any current or past ship.  It was
>                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> |>       so named because of the NCC-1701 and the original show!
> 
> What!?! 
> 
> The following post is from Berbie Wong;
> 
> --- Begin Post ---
> YEAR    EVENT
> 1616    (Great Birtain) HMS ENTERPRISE sent to find an alternate navel
>         route to the Orient, destroyed near India by a hurricane.
> 1760    (United States) USS ENTERPRISE, 12 gun sloop, captured on Lake
>         Champlain  by United patroits in 1775, captained by General
>         Benedict Arnold in the Revolutionary War.  Self-destructed in
>         1777 to prevent capture by British Royal Navy
> 1780    (United States) USS ENTERPRISE, 8 gun schooner, protected the
>         Chesapeake Bay against the British Royal Navy
> 1812    (United States) USS ENTERPRISE, 18 gun schooner, used in the War
>         of 1812, destroyed near the end of the war
> 1936    (United States) USS ENTERPRISE, LEXINGTON-Class military
>         aircraft carrier, built 1938, commissioned 1941, fought several
>         battles during World War II.  Dismantled 1946. Designation: CV-6
> --- End Post ---
> 
> Additionally there is CVN-65 USS Enterprise, Enterprise class nuclear
> aircraft carrier.
> 
> 
> --
> Gordon Edwards                          Email: gordon@meaddata.com
> Mead Data Central                               ...!uunet!meaddata!gordon
> P.O. Box 933                            Phone: (513) 865-7724
> Dayton, OH 45401, USA                     FAX: (513) 865-1655
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Matt Hucke)
Subject: Re: Stupid Question re #6
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 15:10:39 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.052048.7665@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jal41820@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Smiley) writes:
>hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Matt Hucke) writes:
>:)Chekov said "The universal translator would be recognized."  The book claims
>:)that the traitor erased the Klingon language from the computers, but this
>:)isn't official.
>
>Wouldn't that sort of contradict the purpose of the universalality of
>the universal translator? (Did I just make up this word?) I mean, isn't
>it created so that it can transalte languages that are unknown?

Probably it needs a certain amount of time to learn a new language.  Since
Klingon had been erased, it wasn't possible for it to learn Klingon in 
that short time.

No matter how you explain it, it's a stupid scene.


-- 
"What? Over? Did you say it's over? Nothing's over, till we decide it is! 
 Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!" --John Belushi
hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu                        Gene Roddenberry 1921-1991
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Matt Hucke)
Subject: Re: Star Trek's Classics - TOP 10 LIST
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 23:40:21 GMT

In article <92105.174327TAF102@psuvm.psu.edu> <TAF102@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>
>Actually...when STII:TWOK was released Leonard Nimoy did not plan to make
>any more Star Trek movies.  Spock was REALLY suppose to be dead and stay
>dead.  When Nimoy was convinced to come back and make STIII:TSFS, scenes
>were added to the original version of STII:TWOK...or rather certain scenes
>were altered.  Remember when McCoy tries to stop Spock...well, when STII
>was released all Spock did was administer the nerve pinch to McCoy.  The
>altered scene has Spock using the mind-touch to give his katra to McCoy
>["REMEMBER..." Spock says] as he eases his unconscious friend to the floor.

Untrue.  While I do not remember my initial viewing of ST2 well (I was an
11-year old Star *Wars* fan at the time), I have magazine articles which 
dicscuss these clues, including the "Remember", and speculating on how they
would be used in the next movie.  These were printed well before ST3 was
released.
-- 
"...no identification of self or mission; no interference with social develop-
 ment of said planet; no references to space, to other worlds or more advanced
 civilizations."   The PRIME DIRECTIVE, by Gene Roddenberry and Gene L. Coon.
hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu                               Gene Roddenberry 1921-1991
From: jlee@smylex.UUCP (Jeff Lee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: TNG Fonts
Date: 10 Apr 92 14:29:29 GMT
Organization: Shipbrook Software  (Newington, CT)

In article <92100.171211MBS116@psuvm.psu.edu>, MBS116@psuvm.psu.edu (Michael B. Smith) writes:
> 
> Does anyone know a ftp site that has TNG fonts for the Macintosh?

Don't know of any ftp sites, but I *can* give you a pointer.

The typeface used on the Enterprise signage and displays is called
`Microgramma Bold Extended', and is a fairly common typeface.  

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
       Jeff Lee - jlee@smylex.uucp - jlee%smylex.uucp@uhasun.hartford.edu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  Iron rusts from disuse; stagnant water loses its purity and in cold weather
  becomes frozen; even so does inaction sap the vigor of the mind -- da Vinci
From: rslarsen@oregon.uoregon.edu (Ron Larsen)
Subject: Klingon Wars (Klingon v. Romulans)
Organization: University of Oregon
Distribution: universe
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 07:54:29 GMT

	I pulled down the timelines that were posted up on one of these 
lists, and found a couple of holes.  Mostly, these involve the various 
wars.  For example,

1.  We have several references to an actual shooting war between the 
Federation and the Klingon Empire (reference:  _The_Emissary_ for example).  

2.  At some point there must have been a war between the Klingons and the 
Romulans, but we never really hear mention of this.  From my limited 
reasoning and understanding of the ST:TNG events, there would have been some 
sort of shooting war between the Klingons and Romulans, during which the 
events at Nehlander III (sp?) took place.  Or ... the events at either 
Nehlander III or Khitomer would either indicate a shooting war, or at least 
have led to a war.  

	This would have involved the Federation in some way.  Yet, in _The 
Neutral Zone_, we hear that the Federation had not had contact with the 
Romulans in some 70 years or so (Which the Romulan Captain explained by 
saying that the Romulan Empire had been otherwise occupied -- dispite the 
fact that we learn that Spock had met, and conducted a fifty year 
relationship with Pardek.).

3.   There is also the question of the shooting war with the Cardassians.  
We hear references made by (indetermate rank) O'Brien to battles that took 
place in that war.  When was that war and how long did it last?  Do we know 
anything that happened in that war, other than O'Brian shooting a Cardassian?

Inquiring minds want to know!

--
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ronald Larsen                    | BITNET: RSLARSEN@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU |
| Social Science Instructional Lab | Voice:  503 346 2547                |
| University of Oregon (Ory-gun)   | FAX:    503 687 0947                | 
| Eugene, Oregon 97403             | Personal:  HEY YOU!                 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: ddoug@dl5000.bc.edu (Debra R.Douglass)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Wesley's "Punishment" (SPOILERS FOR FIRST DUTY)
Date: 7 Apr 92 01:37:29 GMT
	<92097.002849WITHC@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Organization: Institute for Space Research, Boston College

In article <92097.002849WITHC@CUNYVM.BITNET> WITHC@CUNYVM.BITNET writes:
   In article <VcFsiB2w164w@netlink.cts.com>, trekkie@netlink.cts.com (Bryce
   Newall) says:
   >
   >hucke@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Matt Hucke) writes:
   >
   >> No, but his graduation will be delayed, everyone at the Academy will be
   >> laughing at him, a year's worth of F's destroys his chances of graduating
   >> in the top 10%, and he has to live with 20-th  century doors longer.
   >>
   >He wasn't going to receive F's for his courses.  Rather, it was going to
   >appear as though he had never taken them.  Sure, they'll be easy for him the
   >second time through, but like you said, the other students will be "laughing
   >at him", since they'll all know why he's there.
   >
   >                                                -- Trekkie
   >
   No, more like being scorned, Nova Squadron will be disgraced and won't be
   mentioned...

   >-- 

Have you any idea how much of an impact that 'the other students will
be "laughing at him"' at a military or military-like academy can have
on a student??? It's not like attending a modern-day civilian college.
At miltary academies, there is emphasis on Honor, Loyalty, Code of
Ethics, etc. You live in a separate society for four years in which
the academy occupies almost every waking hour. The academies are
designed for molding and shaping a person and their career rather than just
acquiring an education and a degree.  

Disgrace at modern-day miltary academies can cause drop-out from
school and, at the extreme, severe emotional trauma.  It has even been
known to lead to suicide.

I believe that Wesley got an appropriate punishment for his actions.

-Debbie Douglass

--
ddoug@dl5000.bc.edu
System Administrator and Programmer
Institute for Space Research
Boston College
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: korman@seas.gwu.edu (John Korman)
Subject: Original Star Trek Episode Name
Organization: George Washington University
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 21:54:23 GMT

I am trying to find the name of an original Star Trek episode.
If anyone knows it, I would appreciate a reply.

The storyline is something like this:

Both the Klingons and the ship crew are stuck on the Enterprise. 
There is this "entity"(?!) that feeds of the mutual hatred and 
anger between the two groups and keeps getting more powerful. 
This way it controls them; I think it  plays around with ship systems,
weapons, etc. Eventually the crew realizes this and decides to make 
peace with the Klingons. They all laugh, embrace each other  etc.  
and the "entity" is destroyed and/or runs away.

Thanx,

John
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch)
Subject: Really bad TNG episodes (was Re: 3 more reviews)
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 00:23:47 GMT

mary@wheat-chex.ai.mit.edu (Mary S. Lee) writes:
>>In article <1992Apr15.154206.8369@cco.caltech.edu> tlynch@cco.caltech.edu (Timothy W. Lynch) writes:

>>>Oh, no. I've got several that fall below this, "Qpid" and "The Royale" being
>>>the top (bottom? :-) ) of the list. This is easily in the bottom 10, though,
>>>and probably the bottom five.  
>>
>Although I thought that "QPid" was a very poor episode, I know several
>people who liked it, and I remember others defending it on r.a.s.  

So?  :-)  I know people who thought "Disaster" was the funniest thing they'd
seen in years.  There's no accounting for taste.  :-)

>On the
>other hand, I can't recall *anyone* saying they liked "Justice."  Therefore
>"Justice" may be a better candidate for worst episode, as it appears to be
>almost universally disliked.  [Uh oh, visions of hundreds of irritated
>"Justice" fans frantically typing at their keyboards...]

Janis Cortese among them, if I remember rightly.  I think she's defended it
on occasion.

If we want to gauge "badness" by sheer unpopularity, then Jason Snell ought to 
be able to fill us in with the last poll results on the bottom ten.  (If I
remember that one right, "The Loss" was the least favorite, with "Qpid" and
"The Royale" *and* "Justice" all in the bottom 10.)

>As for "The Royale," I seem to recall that Michael Rawdon quite liked this
>one.  

See?  There's proof positive for you!  :-)  [Sorry, Mary and Michael, but you
can't *possibly* leave a straight line *that* good around and expect it to 
stay unused.  :-) ]

Tim Lynch
From: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Exploding (kibo?) (was, inscrutably Re: Waterworlds)
Date: 9 Apr 92 02:46:41 GMT
Reply-To: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Schaumann)
Organization: University of Arizona

>WHY DO PEOPLE KEEP LYING AND SAYING THAT I WON'T EXPLODE?

BECAUSE IF WE CAN'T GET /YOU/ TO EAT THE BLASTING CAPS, WHO CAN WE?!

-- 
Oh, we are us, sir.  But they are also us.  So indeed -- we are both us.
				-Data, in "We'll Always Have Paris"
From: mwgertz+@cs.cmu.edu (Matthew Gertz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Occurance of 18 in ST: TNG
Date: 12 Apr 92 17:56:27 GMT
Organization: Dept. of ECE, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon

ras@kepler.unh.edu (Robert A Seace) writes:
>bob@jacobs.CS.ORST.EDU (robert s. richardson) writes:
>>But remember, by an amazing coincidence:  18 * 2.333 (repeating) = 42
>>Does anyone have a question for this?

>	How about this:
>	What is the average IQ of r.a.s.* posters?

What's an I.Q?  How do I send away for one?  Is this mentioned in the FAQL?


-- 
Matt Gertz, mwgertz+@cs.cmu.edu
Dept. of ECE, The Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University.
From: haynes@equinox.unr.edu (Kenneth Haynes)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Newsgroup Reorganization????
Date: 16 Apr 92 00:28:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: equinox.3414
Organization: University of Nevada, Reno


Sorry if I seem lost....

What happened to rec.arts.startrek????  Where did R.A.S.misc come
from????

I don't see the other R.A.S.current or whatever they're called newsgroups
in our NNTP servers .newsrc????

----ken

"What do you mean we ran out of gas?"              ______-==-______
                                       ____-------=----------------=-------____
                 ________________  _ _-    --------________________--------
                (______________(_||_) _______ /
                   /_____/_____            _-
  Capt Ken Haynes              \__________-
  CO, USS L'Hopital
  Taylor Series Class Starship
  NCC-x^ln(1701)                United Federation of Calculus Haters
  haynes@unssun.nevada.edu
  haynes@equinox.bitnet
From: pip@pro-freedom.cts.com (David Pipgras)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Subject: Re: Star Trek Book Club
Date: 15 Apr 92 00:06:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: pro-free.1992Apr14.170638.300
Organization: ProLine [pro-freedom] AppleVan (Apple UG of Vancouver, WA)

There are no known, or at least authorized Trek book clubs that I know of,
but some mail order companies offer subscription services where they send
you each new book as they get them. It is probably cheaper to go to the
store and get them since they usually charge a shipping fee, and are
delivered about 2 weeks after the book hits most stores...

Dave
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc