HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: howiegbk@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (Jr Howard Mea Turner)
Subject: Re: A boycott???!!!
Summary: Dittoheads vs.
Keywords: Limbaugh, boycott, EIB,
Organization: HAC - Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 17:34:48 GMT

	Oh sure, a boycott.  Can anyone tell me when the last time a 
boycott was actually effective?  Without the liberal media jumping on
the side of the boycotters, I don't think the average attempt at a 
boycott will work.

	Boycott, schmoycott.

	Oh, and incidently, if Rush wasn't around to stir things up on
both sides, I don't think I would listen to liberal drone at all.  At least
now I enjoy its humor value.  Controversy teaches you to think and decide
on your own.  SILENCE IS NEVER THE WAY TO THE RIGHT ANSWER.  THINK FOR 
YOURSELVES . . . dittoheads included.


			-Howard 

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: enor@woods.ulowell.edu
Subject: THE LIMBAUGH DIR/ALLAMERICAN RE
Organization: University of Lowell
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 03:02:06 GMT

"You Say You Want a Revolution"

The American(read Limbaugh) Revolution of 1992-1996 will be easy to accomplish.
Just follow  these  few steps.

	1.  Tell a friend what station the Limbaugh Show is on in your
	    community. (Radio and TV)

	2.  Tell that same friend to tell 10 friends what station the
	    show is on.

	3.  List the stations at the end of this  post with station  name
            frequency, and city/state.  This will enable other dittoheads
	    to tune in when away from home.  Also good for long distance
	    word of mouth.

	4.  Write to these stations to tell them that you care that they 
	    show these shows.

	5.  Write your Congressman to get a National Resolution proclaiming
	    Rush's Birthday(?).  National Day of Celebration of Rush Limbaugh.

	6.  Call ANY local talk  show you can and sing Rush's praises.

	7.  Make a "pilgrimage"(loose association) to NY to watch the TV Show 
	    being taped.

	8.  Write to your newspaper arguing against any derrogatory story they 
	    may publish about Rush or the Ditto-Head movement.

	9.  Don't vote for anybody who display's Commie-Lib tendacies
	    EVEN for town DOG CATCHER.

	10. Visit your local VA Hospital and tell a veteran you are deeply
 	    Indebted to them for their sacrifices.

	11. Vote a Democrat out of office in 1994
 
	12. If you can  vote in either primary in 1996 vote ABC "Anyone but
	    Clinton"

	13. Vote for Jack Kemp in 96.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
RADIO STATIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Station Name	Frequency	CITY 			STATE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHDH		0850 AM		Boston 			MA


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TELEVISION STATIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Station Name    Frequency       CITY                    STATE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WFXT 		25 UHF		Boston                  MA


Lets start the Revolution!!!!!!!!

Robert R. Eno
A Conservative Voice in the Peoples Democratic Republic of Massachusetts

The views are mine not those of UMASS Lowell
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: rush@eggneb.astro.ucla.edu (Brian Rush )
Subject: Re: Religious Right (was Re: Rush Limbaugh: Victory from Defeat)
Organization: UCLA Dept of Astronomy
Date: 16 Nov 92 13:40:56 PST

In article <1992Nov16.181230.11435@news.ysu.edu> ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) writes:
>
>In a previous article, rickertj@athena.cas.vanderbilt.edu (John Rickert) says:
>
>>
>>   Oh, I get it now.  It took me long enough.  But I think I finally
>>caught on.  Religious = religious right.  A public reference to religion
>>is right-wing extremism.  Now I see...
>
>Wrong.  The "Religious Right" is that body/school of thinking that insists
>that one cannot be a good christian/other faith unless one holds certian
>(usually right wing conservative) political beliefs, and also works to
>get its interpretation of "Morality" legislated into law and classify those
>who do not accept that interpretation as criminals and non-patriots.
>
You are completely ignorant.  You should do at least a little bit of
research before you expose your erroneous oppinions on the world.  What
you have said here is 99% wrong.
>In case there's any doubt, I refer to Pat Robertson and his followers,
>Lou Mabon and his followers, Jerry Fallwell and his followers, and any other
>religious body/person who follows such beliefs.
>
>
>-- 
>*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  /\/\   HATE IS NOT A  *         
>*                    Kelley L. Miller  / /  \  FAMILY VALUE   *            
>*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  / /____\                *  
>*     GIGO: Gospel In--Garbage Out   /______\                 *


Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton
From: steven@advtech.uswest.com ( Steve Novak)
Subject: Re: Liberals DO oppose First Amendment rights
Organization: U S WEST Advanced Technologies
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:23:32 GMT

> =  <1992Nov16.165128.18625@csc.ti.com> d writes:
>> = maxwell@deep-13.gizmo.com writes:
>>> = Marc Barrett writes:

>>> Consertives, however, always respect the First Amendment
>>>  rights of everybody, regardless of opposing viewpoints.

>> Are you a freshman or just stupid?

>It's so good to see you supporting Marc's right to free speech and defending
>it to your last breath. . .

Marc said nothing to imply censorship.  And I support to the death the
right of you and the student to make stupid statements.  BTW, clueless,
the "stupid" part is MY OPINION.  Also protected by the First Amendment.

-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Steve Novak |    |"Wacker the K"| 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
steven@advtech.USWest.Com
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: enor@woods.ulowell.edu
Subject: Re: THE NEWW AMERICAN REVOLUTION                               D
Organization: University of Lowell
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 23:19:04 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.080230.9294@news.ysu.edu>, ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) writes:
> 
> In a previous article, mhl@spirit.ece.cmu.edu (Mikko H. Lipasti) says:
> 
>>In article <1992Nov16.171117.953@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> htuttle@nyx.cs.du.edu (Harry Tuttle) writes:
>>>
>>>BOYCOTT RUSH! BOYCOTT RUSH! BOYCOTT RUSH!
>>>
>>
>>Shouldn't a Rush boycott also include a boycott of this newsgroup?  Please 
>>say yes...what a great way to improve the signal-to-(liberal-whiner)-noise
>>ratio of this group!!!
>>
> 
> Not at all.  This Newsgroup does not put money in Flush Limbowel's pocket.
> 

ah yes but it does help get out his message which in turn puts money in Rush's
pocket.

>
>>==========================================================================
>>
> -- 
> *...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  /\/\   HATE IS NOT A  *         
> *                    Kelley L. Miller  / /  \  FAMILY VALUE   *            
> *                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  / /____\                *  
> *     GIGO: Gospel In--Garbage Out   /______\                 *
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: rlc1028@zeus.tamu.edu  
Subject: Re: Gay Marriages?
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:03:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.015758.831@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>, jpsb@gothamcity.jsc.nasa.gov (Jim Shirreffs) writes...

|The constraints you place on commenting are to broad, you have reduced marrage to simply 
|living together and joint tax returns. If that is all marrage is then there is only one 
|reason i can think of to prohibit homo-sexual marriages.  Adoption.

	Adoption?

	Being married does not imply being adopted, or being able to adopt. 
 What exactly do you mean?

     ____                _
    /    )               /          
   /    /               /       
  (____/   ___     ___ /   ___,    ___   ,___ 
__    /   ____)   /   /   (__     /   )  /   )
 /   /   /   /   /   /       )   /   /  /   /     
(___/   (___(_  (___(_  (___/   (___/  /   (__
From: hargijk@wkuvx1.bitnet
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: THE LIMBAUGH DIR/ALLAMERICAN RE
Date: 16 Nov 92 11:33:15 CST
Organization: Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY

In article <1992Nov16.135413.2195@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>, jbuckner@lonestar.utsa.edu (James A. Buckner) writes:
> In article <1992Nov15.220206.1@woods.ulowell.edu> enor@woods.ulowell.edu writes:
>>"You Say You Want a Revolution"
>>
>>The American(read Limbaugh) Revolution of 1992-1996 will be easy to accomplish.
>>Just follow  these  few steps.
>>
>>	1.  Tell a friend what station the Limbaugh Show is on in your
>>	    community. (Radio and TV)
>>
>>	2.  Tell that same friend to tell 10 friends what station the
>>	    show is on.
>>
>>	3.  List the stations at the end of this  post with station  name
>>            frequency, and city/state.  This will enable other dittoheads
>>	    to tune in when away from home.  Also good for long distance
>>	    word of mouth.
>>
>>	4.  Write to these stations to tell them that you care that they 
>>	    show these shows.
>>
>>	5.  Write your Congressman to get a National Resolution proclaiming
>>	    Rush's Birthday(?).  National Day of Celebration of Rush Limbaugh.
>>
>>	6.  Call ANY local talk  show you can and sing Rush's praises.
>>
>>	7.  Make a "pilgrimage"(loose association) to NY to watch the TV Show 
>>	    being taped.
>>
>>	8.  Write to your newspaper arguing against any derrogatory story they 
>>	    may publish about Rush or the Ditto-Head movement.
>>
>>	9.  Don't vote for anybody who display's Commie-Lib tendacies
>>	    EVEN for town DOG CATCHER.
>>
>>	10. Visit your local VA Hospital and tell a veteran you are deeply
>> 	    Indebted to them for their sacrifices.
>>
>>	11. Vote a Democrat out of office in 1994
>> 
>>	12. If you can  vote in either primary in 1996 vote ABC "Anyone but
>>	    Clinton"
>>
>>	13. Vote for Jack Kemp in 96.
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>RADIO STATIONS
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Station Name	Frequency	CITY 			STATE
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>WHDH		0850 AM		Boston 			MA
>  KTSA           0550 AM         San Antonio             TX
  WLAC          1510 AM    	Nashville		TN
  W???  	0610 AM		Bowling Green		KY
  W???		96.3 FMBuzzard  Bowling Green 		KY
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>TELEVISION STATIONS
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Station Name    Frequency       CITY                    STATE
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>WFXT 		25 UHF		Boston                  MA
>  KMOL           04 VHF          San Antionio            TX (1:05 & 5:30 AM)
  WTVF		05 VHF		Nashville		TN (11:30p)
  WBKO 		13 VHF		Bowling Green		KY (11:00p)
>>
>>Lets start the Revolution!!!!!!!!
>>
AMEN!

>>Robert R. Eno
>>A Conservative Voice in the Peoples Democratic Republic of Massachusetts
>>
>>The views are mine not those of UMASS Lowell
> 
>
From: bboerner@novell.com (Brendan B. Boerner)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Religious Right
Date: 17 Nov 92 22:08:29 GMT
Organization: Novell, Inc. --Austin

In article <1992Nov17.210540.24041@news.vanderbilt.edu> rickertj@athena.cas.vanderbilt.edu (John Rickert) writes:
>
>   Tim Irvin apparently argues that people should be allowed to do
>whatever they want, provided they don't hurt others, (or presumably
>do not use fraud).  This is precisely the position taken by Andre Marrou,
>and I can get a reference if you like.  But you're forgetting something:
>to say that such and such "should" be allowed is to advance a moral
>position.  It is just as moralistic as a morality that calls for
>prohibition of an action.  Permissions and prohibitions differ in

Sort of like anarchy is a type of government?

Brendan
-- 
Brendan B. Boerner		Phone: 512/346-8380
Internet: bboerner@novell.com	MHS: bboerner@novell
Please use ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ if replying by mail exterior to Novell.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch - Day 17
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 16:24:44 GMT

In article <1992Nov19.230907.3411@seq.uncwil.edu> session@seq.uncwil.edu (Zack C. Sessions) writes:
>jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>
>>It's now 17 days after Bill Clinton's election and Rush is still on the 
>>air with 536 radio affiliates and 207 TV affiliates, and his book is 
>>number one on the NY Times hardback non-fiction best-seller lists.
>
>Huh? So what? What has this got to do with the price of eggs in China?

Zack, only you could possibly think that anything in the Rush Limbaugh 
newsgroup would ever have anything to do with the price of eggs in China. 
If you're not sharp enough to stay on top of things, please sit back 
quietly and remember that adage 'it's better to remain silent and be
thought a wise man, thank to speak and remove all doubt whether you're
a fool."
-- 
John Switzer               | "Lobbyists are circling Clinton like slugs
                           | around a saucer of beer."
CompuServe: 74076,1250     | -- Alexander Cockburn, LA Times 11/15/92
Internet: jrs@netcom.com   | (P.S. Impeach Clinton, support the coup!)
From: michael@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Michael of Nebadon)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: alt.rush-limbaugh
Date: 23 Nov 92 05:05:38 GMT
Organization: The Great Beyond

In article <1484@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu> libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson) writes:
>ebcs1011@blurt.oswego.edu writes:
>: 	Lighten up a little.  You can't tell me that you wouldn't have laughed
>: if that was Dan Quayle instead of Chelsea Clinton.      
>
>Dan Quayle, all appearances aside, is a fully-grown adult who has
>voluntarily entered the public sphere; he has to expect a bit of
>abuse.  Chelsea Clinton is a child, for godsake.  

I *really* didn't want to post to this discussion, but I can't
resist. Dan Quayle has a daughter, doesn't he? What must it be like
to have your father the butt-of-first-choice when it comes to political
jokes (for almost 5 years now). Considering what a major figure a
parent is in a child's life, I would go so far as to say that is more
traumatizing than a swapped picture in the wee hours of the morning
on a show whose host is know to be "somewhat biased" against Democrats
anyway.

Am I saying people shouldn't make fun of DQ? Nope. What I'm saying is
that you might as well forget making jokes about anyone if you start
measuring the moral "goodness" of a joke by whether or not a child
will be hurt by it. All we can hope is that career polticians raise
kids who have at least a vague understanding of what the American
political process is all about.

As another data point: Years ago Al Franken did that SNL sketch where
he called Fred Silverman a lame-o and went into great detail about
how Fred had done such a pitiful job at NBC that he didn't deserve the
limo NBC provides upper executives. Silverman, a fully-grown adult, was
watching SNL with his kids when that bit aired.

While I wish Silverman's kids hadn't seen it that way (as I bet
Franken does, as well) it was a _joke_ (unfortunately for Silverman,
one with more than a grain of truth, tho). In the case we're discussing,
the picture swap is ostensibly an accident, the child involved has
*got* to be no stranger to political business-as-usual (unlike most
network exec's kids), and I find it unlikely she was sitting there
watching the show when suddenly the mix-up occured.

In the end, I think there's enough to get worked up about in the
_content_ of Rush's shows without having to go ballistic about the
accidents.

michael@afterlife.ncsc.mil
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: kfp@sibyl.SAIC.Com (Keith Pilotti 552-3900 SV CMCT)
From: hagerjd@carina.unm.edu (John D. Hager)
Subject: Re: Why Rush is a Jack Ass
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 21:35:28 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <Nov18.174717.15232@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> be231642@longs.LANCE.ColoState.Edu (Bret Egan) writes:
>First of all he is farther right than Adolf Hitler.
>
---Give me a break!

>Assuming television and the media are liberal institutions, why would he be
>caught dead surrounded by liberalism?
>
---So he can balance them with "equal time."

>His audiance consists of old people who up till two weeks ago still had a voice
>in our government.  The same people who thought that the debt accumulated over
>the last twelve years was functional for our country, are gloating right now
>about the lower taxes they paid during Reagan/Bush.  
>
---I'm 25.  Is that considered old these days?

>Rush and all the other conservatives are scared to death that the baby-boomers
>are slowly entering our government.  Twenty five years ago our government tried
>to oppress the "Counter Culture" by ending their rallies and demonstrations.  Now
>we elected two men who were taking part in those very same events.  To scare you
>some more, our president and veep also listen to the Grateful Dead.  Isn't
>America great?
>
>Bret 
>
---I agree.  It does worry me quite a bit.  It doesn't worry me to the point
   that I think the country is going to go to hell in a hand basket, because
   I believe that liberalism cannot succeed in this country.  Liberalism 
   diminishes the power that an individual can have over his/her own future and
   puts it in the hands of the government.  I know an awful lot of individuals
   who don't want that to happen.  Therefore, it will not succeed.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
Subject: Re: Here Are The Undeniable Truths of Life
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: usa
Date: 19 Nov 92 17:30:14 GMT

In <Bxxxno.52t@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> aaiken@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Andrew C. Aiken) writes:

>In <grendel.722136033@camelot> grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
>answers his telephone:
> 

>>HELLO!  Remember the coup?  Remember Gorbachev getting kidnapped?  Remember
>>the breakup of the Soviet Union?  It happened because a RIGHT-wing faction
>>of the government, that is, the old guard of Brezhnev/Lenin ideology,
>>opposed Gorbachev's progressivism and willingness to allow state's rights.
>>Calling Soviet government fascist left-wingers is way too convenient.


>	This only goes to show that terms such as "left" and "right" are 
>relative.  Still, to exploit this fact is being disingenuous.  In the
>American political tradition, Breshnev and Lenin could hardly be considered
>conservative.  And is it not the conservative who advocates federalism, that
>doctrine upon which our country was founded, also called "states rights"?


You're right, "left" and "right" are relative.  I interpret "right" as being
conservative, which to me means a desire to maintain the status quo, uphold
tradition, etc., as opposed to "left"/liberal which to me means a desire to
change, experiment, reorganize, etc.




Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:8999 alt.rush-limbaugh:10226
Organization: The Leader Desslok School of Diplomacy
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 16:04:14 EST
From: Mark 'Mark' Sachs <MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Limbaugh Watch Day 15
Distribution: usa
 <LARRY.92Nov21181531@peak.psl.nmsu.edu> <1992Nov22.061347.13993@netcom.com>
 <grendel.722457042@camelot> <knauer.722462322@pegasus.cs.uiuc.edu>

In article <knauer.722462322@pegasus.cs.uiuc.edu>, knauer@pegasus.cs.uiuc.edu
(Rob Knauerhase) says:
>The Limbaugh Watch is only a waste of bandwidth in that it draws out the
>lame and feebleminded from their keyboards and infuriates them that someone
>like Limbaugh could be in-touch enough with the country to remain so popular.

Heh. Yeah, he's so "in-touch" that his party lost the Presidency, the Senate,
the House, and most governorships...

But don't let me intrude with annoying reality. :-)

 "But Dr. Radium, was that necessary?" "Rez, _everything_ I do is necessary."
[Your blood pressure just went up.]        Mark Sachs IS: mbs110@psuvm.psu.edu
DISCLAIMER: If PSU knew I had opinions they'd probably try to charge me for it.
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 09:59:02 EST
From: <GJS110@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Ever heard of Radical Conservativism?

It's people like Rush Limbaugh that are responsible for the stagnation of the
growth of social conscienciousness in this great country!!  'Nuff said.

                                      In praise of Bozo and the Ozone Man,

                                                    A (ahem) Liberal
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: usenet@csc.ti.com
Subject: Re: Liberals DO oppose First Amendment rights
Organization: Texas Instruments
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 22:17:33 GMT

In article <1992Nov16.141540.1@deep-13.gizmo.com>, maxwell@deep-13.gizmo.com writes:
|> In article <1992Nov16.165128.18625@csc.ti.com>, d writes:
|> > In article <1992Nov15.054513.1@deep-13.gizmo.com>, maxwell@deep-13.gizmo.com writes:
|> > |> In article <BxoBI8.39r@news.iastate.edu>, barrett@iastate.edu (Marc N. Barrett) writes:
|> > |> 
|> > |> [...]
|> > |> 
|> > |> >    All of this leads me to the solid conclusion that conservatives
|> > |> > are the real guarantors of First Amendment Rights in the U.S.  Liberals
|> > |> > support other people's First Amendment rights only when the speach 
|> > |> > agrees with them.  Liberals have concocted a large number of terms 
|> > |> > like "political correctness" in attempt to stifle the First Amendment
|> > |> > rights of people with opposing viewpoints.  Political incorrectness
|> > |> > **IS** fully protected by the First Amendment, but liberals refuse to
|> > |> > accept this.  Conservatives, however, always respect the First Amendment
|> > |> > rights of everybody, regardless of opposing viewpoints.
|> > |> 
|> > |> Are you a freshman or just stupid?
|> > 
|> > It's so good to see you supporting Marc's right to free speech and defending
|> > it to your last breath. . .
|> 
|> His assertion that Conservatives are the single and only Bastion of First 
|> Amendment Protection *is* stupid. Such obviously false nonsense deserves to be
|> challenged.

You didn't challenge anything, you just did some name calling.  Grow up.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: LimBaugh, Mainstream Capitalist
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 19:10:07 GMT

jvogel@math.rutgers.edu (jeff vogel) writes:

] Fascinating article in the New York Times today. It seems that our dear,
] dear idol, Rush Limbaugh, not long before his radio show went on the
] air, hosted a New York radio talk show with a highly liberal slant.
] He had often complained that his views, while popular, were not getting
] good ratings, and that he had some interesting ideas for what to do if the 
] show was cancelled.
] 
] It is clear to me that he is really a closet liberal, only pretending to
] be a closed-minded idealogue in order to appeal to the more common of the
] common man and make a lot of money.


Jeff,

we understand that you are still NEW to these things,
so lets work the matter through slowly.

Rush did a liberal show, it did not work.
Morton Downy Jr. Did a 'Shock Jock' Show, as
did Geraldo, and both of them wound up getting
bit parts in Movies.

There is a limited BandWidth in the "Jesus Gave Me
A Vision to SAVE YOUR SOUL, So SEND ME MONEY" format.

So Rush has opted to marry the HighQuality of 
Religious TV with the TrendoMatics of the RighteousRight!

It sells! It Makes Him Money! It means he does not have
to Get a RealJob[tm] or live on the dole.

These are Classic Conservative Values.

ciao
drieux


-- 
Modern Day Problems:

Hi Diddle, Diddle, the Cat and the Fiddle,
The Cow Blew Up on the Launching Pad
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:9074 alt.rush-limbaugh:10337 alt.politics.bush:14027