HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tmolbach@Lise.Unit.NO (Thomas M|lbach)
Subject: Re: GhostScript 252 couldn't be closed
Keywords: loose focus
Organization: Norwegian Institue of Technology
Distribution: comp
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 92 10:31:15 GMT

In article <hess.724086144@swt1>, hess@swt1.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Hauke Hess) writes:
 > Hi,
 > 
 > I just installed gs252pm.zip and am very impressed by the speed it
 > reaches on my 1024x768x256 display driver.
 > 
 > But one problem remains: if I click at the gsos2a window (running
 > in text mode) to press "Return" and type in "quit" to end the
 > program, nothing happens after "quit". Even worse, if I type
 > Ctrl-C to force a stop of the process, the process is stopped
 > but the textwindows doesn't accept any keypresses since then
 > 
 > Even selecting "close" from the window list for this window doesn't
 > quit it.
 > 
 > This does not happen if I enter quit while the graphical display is
 > on top.
 > 
 > Any ideas?
 > 
 > Hauke
 > 

I've got the same problem. Looks like there is a bug somewhere?
Does someone know if there is? (I'm running OS/2 WITH the CSD!)

  _______   _   _    ___    _   _    ___    ___
 (__   __) | |_| |  / _ \  | \ / |  / _ \  / __) \  Thomas Molbach
    | |    |  _  | | ( ) | |  V  | | /_\ | \___   \  Norwegian Insitute Of
    | |    | | | | | (_) | | |V| | |  _  |  __ \   \  Technology
    |_|    |_| |_|  \___/  |_| |_| |_| |_| (___/    \  tmolbach@lise.unit.no
     
 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: confused@cwis.unomaha.edu (stephen richard smith)
Subject: win3.1 and os2.20
Summary: win3.1 and os2.20
Keywords: win3.1
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 09:08:22 GMT



   Is there anyone out there that has come up with a way to run win3.1 
either right out of os2 or from a dos promt.????
  I miss my soundblaster and there is no svga driver for os2 for my
videocard I am going insane listening to beeps and blind from staring
at vga graphics

--
                !!MERRRY CRHISTMAS AND HAVE A HAPPY NEW YEAR!!
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 e-mail addresses: Internet confused@cwis.unomaha.edu: Sysop, Another boring
 Bbs 402-397-5088 supporting speeds up to 14.4,: compuserve 70614,3057
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Help needed getting Os2You to recognise my modem...
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 23:05:11 GMT

In article <BzFAGs.A97@andy.bgsu.edu> jzawodn@bgsu.edu (jeremy zawodny) writes:
>I've been having problems getting OS2YOU to work on my system.
>I have a modem configured on COM4 and a mouse on COM1.  The other 2 com ports
>are disabled.  When I run os2you, it give me the following message:
>1992-12-17  16:20:33 => Os2You 2.7 Host mode started at device COM4
>1992-12-17  16:20:33 => !Could not initialize device: COM4
>So, what might I have done wrong?  I believe I configured everything properly.
>Any Ideas, Suggestions, Further Questions?
>Thanks for any help,

See the FAQ List for advice.

If at all possible, you'll want to configure things so that you have
an ordinary COM1 and COM2.  Since you are only using two COM ports,
that should be doable.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: harriga@duc.auburn.edu (Greg A. Harris)
Subject: Re: CKermit - help!
Organization: Auburn University, Alabama
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 18:31:38 GMT


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: nmouawad@waterloo.edu (Naji Mouawad)
Subject: Zmodem from within CKermit... how to ? (was Re: CKermit - help!)
Organization: University of Waterloo
	<1992Dec13.053154.8555@ousrvr.oulu.fi>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 23:27:54 GMT


I've downloaded the latest Ckermit version CK5a and after setting
carrier to off I was able to connect which is very nice.

Is there a 32-bit public domain or at leat a shareware (reasonable
price) zmodem which could work with CKermit ? While we are at it how
does the speed of CKermit compares to that of Zmodem ? If it is
anywhere close I would gladly stick to this very fine product. 


naji.

--
     -------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Naji Mouawad  |          nmouawad@watmath.waterloo.edu            |
    |  University   |---------------------------------------------------|
    | Of Waterloo   |   "The Stranger in us is our most familiar Self"  |
     -------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: SCANNON@novell.com (Steve Cannon)
Subject: Borland C++ 3.1 not working
Organization: Novell, Inc. --Austin
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1992 15:50:55 GMT

I am trying to use Borland C++ 3.1 and it's crashing my DOS session.

Here's the setup:

Compaq DeksPro 386s with 8 Meg and VGA.

DOS Session consists of 4DOS command processor (not command.com).  I'm in a 
NetWare Private DOS session using the OS/2 Requestor.  In the DOS Setting of 
the notebook, I have DPMI set to ENABLED as required by the readme for OS/2.


I even tried using the command.com supplied with OS/2 and that didn't help 
either.  Funny that I don't have this problem on my machine at home (which 
is a no-name clone).

I have tried narrowing down the culprit of my problem but I've run out of 
ideas.  Any you have would be appreciated!
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|Steve Cannon                       | Novell, Inc.                      |
|Internet: scannon@novell.com       | 5918 W. Courtyard Dr.             |
|MHS     : scannon@novell           | Austin, TX  78730                 |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: harriga@duc.auburn.edu (Darrel Hankerson)
Subject: Re: GhostScript 252 couldn't be closed
Reply-To: harriga@mail.auburn.edu (Darrel Hankerson)
Organization: Auburn University, Alabama
Distribution: comp
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 02:04:27 GMT

In article <Bz9v2x.C47@news.iastate.edu> jbhuber@iastate.edu (Joseph B Huber) writes:
>Darrel Hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu writes:
>>Huber has also done a very nice ghostscript port (but the window will not
>>re-draw).
>
>I don't think this port was done by a Huber, but I don't remember the name of
>the person who did it.
>
>I can't seem to find this other OS/2 port; can someone point me to it?

I should have said that Gershon Elber (gershon@gr.cs.utah.edu) had done the
other ghostscript port for OS/2.  My apologies to Mr Huber and Mr Elber.

Our dept has been testing Mr Huber's port of Ispell--thanks Mr Huber!

--Darrel Hankerson hank@ducvax.auburn.edu


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: confused@cwis.unomaha.edu (stephen richard smith)
Subject: Re: AfterDark for Windows on OS/2
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 09:01:54 GMT

sal8@po.cwru.edu (Steve Luzynski) writes:

>In article <1992Dec9.035935.16762@samba.oit.unc.edu> Wally.Hass@launchpad.unc.edu (Wally Hass) writes:
>>From: Wally.Hass@launchpad.unc.edu (Wally Hass)
>>Subject: AfterDark for Windows on OS/2
>>Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1992 03:59:35 GMT
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>	I posted this quesion the other day and received no help on this. 
>>I am having problems installing AfterDark for Windows on OS/2.  If I type
>>in the command line "win install" from the a:\ prompt..Winos/2 loads but
>>tells me that it cannot run a DOS session from Winos/2.  Has anyone
>>installed this program?  I know it can be done, because in the Readme file
>>that comes with OS/2 it talks ababout using this program, but no
>>installation instructions. 
>>
>Just open a full screen WINOS/2 session and use the 'Run...' choice from the 
>file menu of the program manager.

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Steve Luzynski @ Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, OH
>sal8@po.cwru.edu             | voice calls cheerlessly accepted at x2153.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>happy people are deluding themselves that there is nothing wrong.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>life is but a series of bitter dissapointments.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>i don't get it either. just go with it.



  I run the norton desktop with win/os2 all I do is open the disk icon  
when the window comes up click on the afterdark .exe install file and bingo
it was up if you have file manager you can do the same thing. after i set it 
up in windows i migrated it to th os2 desk top and it works great.
--
                !!MERRRY CRHISTMAS AND HAVE A HAPPY NEW YEAR!!
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 e-mail addresses: Internet confused@cwis.unomaha.edu: Sysop, Another boring
 Bbs 402-397-5088 supporting speeds up to 14.4,: compuserve 70614,3057
From: ear@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (Mr. Neat-O [tm])
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: Need info on the OS/2 SP
Date: 21 Dec 1992 06:12:41 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigwpi.wpi.edu

In article <1992Dec20.232959.4723@spcvxb.spc.edu> benezra_a@spcvxb.spc.edu writes:
>In article <1992Dec20.195619.20277@midway.uchicago.edu>, silveanu@uhuru.uchicago.edu (Adrian Silveanu) writes:
>> Could you please tell me what advancements are in the OS/2 SP?
>> What verison will it make OS/2 now?
>> Is it faster?
>> Does it have SVGA drivers?
>> 
>The version is the same, but the CSD level is now XR06055.
>Some say it is faster, some say slower. You now have a 32 bit GRE, however.
>It has Tseng ET4000 drivers that i know of. Yes SVGA

I have a 16 Mhz 386sx w/8 Mb Ram and a 1 Mb Trident 8900c and recently
applied the service pack.  While still running the 16 bit video drivers from
Trident (under the 32 bit GRE), I did see a bit of a slowdown in the video.
I have since installed the new 32 bit Trident drivers and the video is
definitely faster than before.  Also, the palette management works properly,
and I can now do seemless windows at 1024x768x256 or any of the other 256
color modes.  I'm very pleased with the SP and with the support from
Trident.

+---------< Eric A. Rasmussen - Mr. Neat-O (tm) >---------+ +< Email Address >+
|   A real engineer never reads the instructions first.   | | ear@wpi.wpi.edu |
|   (They figure out how it works by playing with it.)    | | ear%wpi@wpi.edu |
+---------------------------------------------------------+ +-----------------+
                     ((( In Stereo Where Available )))
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: jurlwin@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU (Jeff Urlwin)
Subject: Re: Help needed w. Service Pack.....
Organization: University of Maine, Department of Computer Science
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 03:29:14 GMT

In article <1gmsmhINN6uq@nestroy.wu-wien.ac.at> warmuth@warmuth.wu-wien.ac.at writes:
>In  <1992Dec15.202238.27690@odin.diku.dk>  marb@diku.dk (Martin Buhmann) writes:
>> I have received the service pack, but can't install it on my
>> PS2. I get an error message, that there are no files to be
>> updated (there are at least one, or what..)
>>  Has it anything to do with installing OS2 on drive D?
>Installing the Service Pack over OS/2 on drive D works fine (did it twice).
>That can't be the reason. But the SP is detecting if it was installed before.
>That's the usual reason for your error message. (Can that be?).
>

Did you recently purchase your PS2?  Did it have a pre-installed copy of
OS/2?  That might be the trick.  I'm not sure, though, because I'm not
rich enough to have a PS2 of my own...:)

Jeff



-- 
--------------------------------------
jurlwin@gandalf.umcs.maine.edu

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: mgrice@athena.mit.edu (Matthew Grice)
Subject: OS/2 Apps (Nooooo! Not in this group!)
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 23:57:01 GMT

What are some good shareware packages for os/2?  What I need is a bunch of
good ones on a big cd-rom.  I want quality WP, Database, and Spreadsheet
programs, not some of the lower-quality public domain things.  I hope
to have gui-mode ones, not just text ones.  

Another note, what are good cd-rom drives and packages for os/2?
the NEC 83 looks good, and so does the sony cd laser library, which 
includes discs (dos, I think)

Could someone give me information about the availability and quality of these
packages?  Thanks, 

Matt
mgrice@athena.dialup.mit.edu
From: ffujita@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Frank Fujita)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: problems with EPM
Date: 20 Dec 92 12:47:57 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

Let me ask if anybody knows how to get rid of the 256 character/line
limit in EPM.
Frank Fujita
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Generic or Trident 800x600x16 ?
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:48:56 GMT

In article <Byy7oq.5Bs@hpuerca.atl.hp.com> aaa@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Simon Fowler) writes:
>> I would recommend the 800x600 16 color driver from Trident.  It
>> supports seamless Windows, has speed, and is generally a good choice
>> for 14 inch monitors (which most people have).  Having 256 colors is
>> great, but the speed penalty is usually too much for me.
>I would go with the 800x600, but it only uses about 2/3 of the screen (vertically). Is there
>some adjustment to correct this? I have tried TVGACRTC.SYS which does adjust to the full height
>for 800x600, but locks up the system when installed in CONFIG.SYS. The monitor will not adjust to
>the full height either

You can generate that SVGADATA.PMI file under plain DOS.  Set up
TVGACRTC.SYS the way you want (using the TVGACRTC.EXE utility), load
it in CONFIG.SYS under plain DOS (floppy boot is fine), boot DOS, and
run SVGA ON DOS (using the SVGA.EXE program in \OS2).  Copy this file,
SVGADATA.DOS to \OS2\SVGADATA.PMI.  Reboot into OS/2, and you should
be all set.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
From: olavt@ulrik.uio.no (Olav Torvund)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
Subject: Re: WordPerfect Info.
Date: 12 Dec 92 10:55:14 GMT
Organization: University of Oslo, Norway

I think WP learned a lesson or two from Wp for Win, and they might bee
too cautious for the moment. It was said to be out soon, but it was
delay after delay. Now they will not say anything before the product
is ready for shipping. It seems that they are aslo careful not to tell
about new fatures. If my memory is correct, I think it was WP that
first had customized buttons, but when the product finally was
released, other software houses had taken the idea and implemented it
in a better way than WP (like Louts "Smart Icons").

Olav Torvund
University of Oslo
Norway
Olavt@jus.uio.no
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: America OnLine Software?
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 18:37:01 GMT

In article <If=_yxO00WB8I5m1Y0@andrew.cmu.edu> ks3l+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kenton Shaver) writes:
>America On Line == Microsoft Corp. !!
>Doesn't everybody know that?
>They undoubtedly LOOKED for ways to make their software
>incompatible with OS/2 2.0

AOL uses Geoworks, which, last I checked, isn't owned by Microsoft.

There have been many AOL/Geoworks patches floating around, however.
There's one available via anonymous ftp from ftp-os2.nmsu.edu, for
example.

Also note that in one of the last OS/2 applications lists I saw that
Sierra Online had some sort of native OS/2 software for connecting to
their service.  I haven't verified that, but you might want to check
with them.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
From: jurlwin@gandalf.UMCS.Maine.EDU (Jeff Urlwin)
Subject: Re: ASPI driver for COREL SCSI (Re: ASPI for WINOS2)
Organization: University of Maine, Department of Computer Science
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 03:31:30 GMT

In article <JONPO.92Dec16101723@kelvin.uio.no> jonpo@kelvin.uio.no (Jon Petter Omtvedt) writes:
>
>   In article <kspousta.723854818@qualcom> kspousta@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Kevin Spousta) writes:
>   >mwaldorf@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Matthias Waldorf) writes:
>   >
>   >>We are using an Agfa Focus scanner connected to the Adaptec 1542B
>   >>SCSI adapter. Under Windows it's possible to use the same adapter
>   >>for both the harddisk and the scanner. Agfa's software uses the
>   >>aspi4dos driver to access the scanner. Under OS2 the software can't
>   >>access the scanner. Is there any ASPI driver for OS2 which does
>   >>also work in WINOS2 sessions ? Any help is welcome !
>   >
>   > DL'ed OS2_ASPI.EXE from Adaptec's BBS yesterday..  Lemme see if I can
>   >dig up the number here...  Ah..  here it is...
>   >
>   >408-945-7727  
>   >
>   >the file is in the OS2 SIG..
>   >
>   Unfortunately OS2ASPI.DMD will only work with OS/2 applications.
>
>   John
>
>I very much want an ASPI driver which can be used with the OS/2
>COREL SCSI driver (I want to use mye MAXTOR RXT-800HS WORM disk
>with os/2) for the IBM PS/2, mod.90. Does anybody know if the
>mentioned ASPI driver can be used? Or is there any other possible
>drivers? I there exsists a ASPI driver, information on a ftp 
>cite where I can get it would be appreciated!

Who makes your SCSI controller?  IBM?  Contact IBM to see if they
provide an ASPI driver for your adapter.

Jeff

-- 
--------------------------------------
jurlwin@gandalf.umcs.maine.edu

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: pjdm@chmeee.enet.dec.com (Peter Mayne)
Subject: Why 512MB limit in OS/2?
Reply-To: Peter.Mayne@cao.mts.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 06:44:26 GMT


Why does OS/2 have a limit of 512MB per application?

PJDM
--
Peter Mayne                     | My statements, not Digital's.
Digital Equipment Corporation   |
Canberra, ACT, Australia        | "AXP!": Bill the Cat

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: timbol@netcom.com (Mike Timbol)
Subject: Re: NT is missing something major:  OS/2 32-bit compatibility
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 09:23:32 GMT

In article <2b29ae56@f514.n202.z1.fidonet.org> Craig_Swanson@f514.n202.z1.fidonet.org writes:
>
>OS/2 2.x in some version past 2.1 will probably be able to run Win32s
>applications as IBM is rumored to have started work on this a few
>months ago.
>I don't believe they made an "official" announcement yet, however.  I
>don't believe that Microsoft has made an "official" announcement about
>Win32s final ship date yet, either, but we all know that its coming,
>right?

An "official" announcement about the *existence* of a project is far
different from an "official" announcement about the *ship date* of a
product.  Just because we all know Win32s is coming, don't even try
to extrapolate that into your statement that "OS/2 2.x will be able
to run Win32s applications".

Now back to your rumor:  Where did you read it/see it?  Was it "A friend
in IBM development told me..." or was it "I saw someone post on the net
that..."?  I'm not trying to shoot this down since it would be great
if it existed, but there are various technical reasons why it would be
pretty difficult.

     - Mike

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari)
Subject: Re:  More Controversial Topics
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 13:24:43 GMT

In article <Joe.007r@twistor.dialix.oz.au> Joe@twistor.dialix.oz.au (Joe Katnic) writes:
>   I also didn't mention that the PS/2 295 has a minimum price
>   tag of $12,000 AUS. It looks like a small AS/400. Just something
>   that every user is going to have on their desktop!


	Rather, what every user is going to *want* on their
	desktop.

>   You stated that OS/2 does not TODAY support S-M-P. I proved
>   it does. Not everyone is going to want S-M-P. Currently the


	You're wrong, pure and simple.

	The OS/2 that is running on the 295 is NOT
	... *NOT* the OS/2 you are running.  It is NOT
	the "all 32-bit but really only 'mostly' 32 bit"
	OS that you are using.  The "SMP" (see below) 
	version running on the 295 is a hacked version
	of OS/2 1.3.  

	(In other words, several years out of date)

	Furthermore, it is *NOT* SMP in the way you
	mean SMP.  On the 295, the version of OS/2
	that is running basically is divided in
	half (i.e. a 3rd or 4th processor wont
	do jack without a total rewrite on the 
	level with the one that introduced the
	support for the second).  One processor
	is tied up doing OS/2 OS things, one handles
	the LAN.  They do not share or swap threads.
	It is no more SMP than an Amiga with a
	PC-on-a-card running in the background is.


>   version of OS/2 that can to S-M-P is used for a MASSIVE server.
>   We are talking alots of GBytes disk space. 


	SMP hasn't got jack to do with being a server
	any more than having a fast processor does.


>   P.S. How many OS's has MicroSoft produced that do S-M-P ?
>            Answer: Windows NT (not yet Avail.) = 0.


	NT has been demoed on SMP i486 machines and SMP
	Alpha based machines.  OS/2 2.0 has *never* been 
	demoed on SMP anything, and neither has OS/2MACH.



-- 
 Snout: O Bottom, thou art chang'd!  What do I see on thee?          
 Bottom: What do you see?  You see an ass-head of your own, do you?

 I've got my flame proof jacket, how about you?  
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Subject: Re: Survivability
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 18:27:31 GMT

In <1992Dec14.194222.17458@wam.umd.edu> rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari) writes:

>In article <2b2bd42c@f514.n202.z1.fidonet.org> George_Marengo@f514.n202.z1.fidonet.org writes:
>>Yam> from one another).  OTOH, it is a lot slower and somewhat
>>Yam> less stable than Win3.1, and has none of Win3.1's features.
>> OTOH, I am using the WinOS231 subsystem (beta) and it is faster
>>in all regards compared to MS-Windows 3.1. It should be available for
>>general use (released) within a month or so. On file loads/saves it's 
>>faster, on scrolls it's faster, on Winbench it's faster than the MS
>>product. 

>	OTOH, it's not here yet, and to IBM 1 month really means
>	120 days.  Go FUD yourself.

Which would seem to imply that we should expect to see NT (given the
ratio between IBM time and MS time) sometime late in 1996.

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy