HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: covici@ccs.covici.com (John Covici)
Reply-To: covici@ccs.covici.com
Newsgroups: alt.activism
Subject: Re: Jerry Brown's Agenda For Destroying America
Date: 8 Apr 92 6:34:25 GMT
Organization: Covici Computer Systems

pierce@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (Brad Pierce @ UCLA Computer Science Department) once wrote....
>For further information see:
>
>Author:        King, Dennis.
>Title:         Lyndon LaRouche and the new American fascism / Dennis King. 1st
>

What does this have to do  with the subject?  Its a slander by 
someone from the drug lobby -- not too useful.
                 ed. New York : Doubleday, 1989.

----
Please respond by e-mail as I get very far behind in reading this 
newsgroup.

         John Covici
          covici@ccs.covici.com

Xref: sparky alt.activism:7360 talk.politics.misc:17316
From: 912016f@ace.acadiau.ca (JACQUELINE FRENCH)
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.censorship,alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: HOLOCAUST MYTHS
Date: 16 Apr 92 01:29:22 GMT
Organization: Acadia University

In article <eBF9iB1w164w@b-cpu.UUCP> pfaust@b-cpu.UUCP (Pete Faust) writes:
>From: pfaust@b-cpu.UUCP (Pete Faust)
>Subject: HOLOCAUST MYTHS
>Date: 14 Apr 92 17:48:25 GMT


>     The media's use of the Laugh Track is to destroy our
>morals, ethics (including work ethic), educational system and
>family unit.  Theft, drugs, prostitution, rape and murder
>(anything illicit) rate laughs, including incest.

Just passing through alt.censorship...
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
---------------Laugh Track On---------------------------------------------

Nazi Hate-posts rate laughs, including incest, too - don't they ?
If laughing at rape and murder destroys ethics and the family unit,
then LOGICALLY :) laughing at B-CPU should destroy the ZIONIST THOUGHT 
POLICE ! You guys should PAY us for making fun of you.
But then again, logic is a Zionist conspiracy... 

 >Pete Faust
>Institute for Relearning
               ^^^^^^^^^^
               a.k.a. AMNESY INTERNATIONAL       
>-.-
>Banished CPU supports FREEDOM OF SPEECH.  Currently no fees.
>CALL:  +1(503) 232-6566 (8N1, v.32/42/bis) or +1(503) 232-5783 (8N1)
>UUCP:  Path (..twiki!b-cpu) "ELIMINATED" BY ZIONIST THOUGHT POLICE!!!
>Users of Banished CPU are solely responsible for their actions.
Xref: sparky alt.activism:7403 alt.individualism:2342 talk.politics.misc:17423
From: rdippold@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.individualism,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Justice Thomas (was Socialism Security Rides Again)
Date: 8 Apr 92 20:41:27 GMT
Article-I.D.: qualcom.rdippold.702765687
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA

KENH@YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (Ken Hudson) writes:
>In article <2718@master.CNA.TEK.COM>
>mikeq@saab.CNA.TEK.COM (Mike Quigley) writes:
> 
>>
>> And guess who voted to uphold the case. Yup, ol' Long Dong Thomas
>> hisself. If I remember right, during his confirmation hearings, didn't
>> the dongman refuse to answer questions about HIS interest in porn
>> because, and I quote: ``What I do behind the doors of my home is
>> no one's business but my own.''?
>>
> 
>Yeah...can you believe the integrity of this one!!!!  He votes to
>uphold a case that CLEARLY should not have been upheld only to APPEAR
>to the world that he is anti-pornography, etc...The guy is willing to
>compromis the interpretation of the Constitution in order to
>continue to fight any lingering, unflattering perceptions created by his
>confirmation hearings...Hey, Clarence, wake up.  The confirmation is over
>and your manipulations now affect the future of this country and millions
>of Americans.  Drop the bullshit, grow up, and conduct yourself in a
>manner appropriate to a member of the highest court in the country.
> 
>Anyone for an "Impeach Thomas" movement?

Uh, guys, he voted to have the case thrown out.  He supported the
farmer against the government's sting operation.
-- 
I liked "Slaughterhouse 5", but I can't find the first four anywhere.
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.censorship,alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc
From: rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Subject: Re: HOLOCAUST MYTHS
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 23:49:01 GMT

gummitch@techbook.com (Jeff Frane) writes:
>I do live in the same city and have posted a couple of requests that
>"Maynard", the sysop, come out from behind his alias.  So have others,
>and Maynard has admitted using several aliases (including, probably, Pet
>Faust, ?).  To date, he's refused to give a reason for this cowardice.
>It could just be that he's embarrassed that someone who knows him in the
>real world might find out who Maynard is -- probably he's afraid to
>express these opinions without the anonymity of the net (or the bbs)
>because he couldn't stand to have people laughing at him.  But in his

It's probably because if people found out who he really was he'd
suffer no end of mail and phone harassment, letters to his boss, etc.
He might be using anonymity to spread his slime and protect himself
from terrorism.
-- 
Your most useful program will be continually improved until it is useless.
Xref: sparky alt.activism:7809 talk.politics.misc:18504 misc.legal:9381
From: bell@tigger.cs.unc.edu (Andrew Bell)
Newsgroups: alt.activism,talk.politics.misc,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Justice Thomas (was Socialism Security Rides
Date: 16 Apr 92 18:25:53 GMT
Followup-To: alt.activism
Organization: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

>In article <1992Apr9.141507.1@hamp.hampshire.edu> jyanowitz@hamp.hampshire.edu writes:
>>BTW, I don't like Thomas, and I think it's a disgrace that
>>he (along with 7 others) upheld beatings of prisoners in jail, along
>>with other heinous decisions.

The sad thing is that from what I have heard about that particular case,
all nine of the members of the court made the wrong decision.

7 of them decided in favor of the plaintiff,  that the eighth amendment
was somehow relevant in this case.  It really wasn't.  The government did
not initiate the beatings.  It was the action of an individual empowered
by the government,  but unless one could show that the government either
condoned or even encouraged the beatings,  why should this matter?  If
I shoot someone while working as a toll collector,  the state shouldn't
be liable,  I should.  In the same vein,  in this case the beaters should
be the ones liable for damages,  since they were acting outside the
parameters of their job description.

Thomas and Scalia chose the right side but for the wrong reason,  from what
I've heard on NPR and other reports.  The gist of their view,  I'm given
to understand,  is that the beatings were not severe enough to be cruel
and unusual punishment.  Hmm...

Does anyone have any further (and I hope contradictory,  since these guys
are going to be making important decisions for a long time to come)
information about this case and the opinions?

   -Andrew Bell
bell@cs.unc.edu
From: cts@dragon.com
Newsgroups: alt.activism
Subject: The liberal/progressive view..
Date: 10 Apr 92 18:44:23 GMT
Organization: Computer Projects Unlimited

Reposted from rec.humor.  A telling summary of the liberal/progressive
view.

In article <S3c5.3137@looking.on.ca>, wvenable@stats.adelaide.edu.au (Bill Venables) writes:
> A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho.  On the way he fell
> among thieves, who took all his goods, beat him savagely and left him
> dying by the wayside.
> 
> As it happend on that same day two social workers passed that way, and
> looking upon him were filled with pity and concern.  Whereupon one
> turned to the other and said
> 
> 	"The person who did this needs our help!"
> 
> --
> Bill Venables, Dept. of Statistics,  
> Univ. of Adelaide, South Australia. 
Xref: sparky alt.activism:7832 alt.censorship:3384 talk.politics.mideast:11032 talk.politics.misc:18564
From: galitz@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
Newsgroups: alt.activism
Subject: Who are the presidential candidates, anyway?
Keywords: Informed voters
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 92 20:56:43 PDT
Reply-To: galitz@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us




     Does anyone have a complete list of the presidential 
candidates running (in all of the political parties, in all of the 
states)?  Or even a partial list?

-Geoff
-- 
------------------------------------------------------
Is it Love, or is it the idea of being in Love?
galitz@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
From: rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Newsgroups: alt.activism
Subject: Re: Larry Agran IS being denied "free speech"
Date: 13 Apr 92 06:13:47 GMT
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA

aq817@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Steve Crocker) writes:
>But suppose I WANT to listen to Larry Agran, or Gene McCarthy, or
>Frank Zappa, or Lyndon LaRouche.  As it happens, I'm fortunate 
>enough to have access to usenet, the last uncensored mass medium.
>But suppose I depended solely on TV as so many people do? Where 
>is my right to listen? 

Perhaps you should call Agran's campaign and let them fill your ears
and head.  If someone's truly interested they can get the information.
As for getting them interested in the first place, well, that's the
problem of the Agran campaign.  If he has anything worthwhile to say,
anything that will attract inserest, then he's going to be able to
gather a large following locally and spread out from there.  If he
can't do it, perhaps he really is a fringe candidate.  There's
hundreds of little causes out there that would love to get on the ABC
Evening News.  Most of them don't.  Tough.

They're more likely to get mentioned in the paper, and indeed that's
where I've seen Agran mentioned.  On the other hand, then they're
buried in with a whole lot of other minor incidents.  Tough.

Nobody's stopping you from listening.
-- 
There is no substitute for good manners, except, perhaps, fast reflexes.
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.activism.d,soc.culture.jewish,soc.motss,soc.rights.human,alt.discrimination,alt.society.civil-liberties
From: prs@turing.acs.virginia.edu (Phillip R. Scarr)
Subject: Re: Help stop the KKK
Organization: The Turing Project, Charlottesville Virginia.
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 11:28:26 GMT

In article <dragon.702962857@camelot> dragon@camelot.bradley.edu (Matthew Korth) writes:
>In <1992Apr9.231614.17905@ucunix.san.uc.edu> schectr@ucunix.san.uc.edu (ROBB SCHECTER) writes:
>Sorry, you lose me here.  I may, and in fact *do*, disagree with what
>the KKK has to say.  However, they have a right to say it.  The First
>Amendment applies to them, too.

But they have a right to make as much noise as they want as well in an
effort to drown out the hateful speach of the KKK.  No one disagrees
that they have a right to speak, it's just that the rest of us have a
right to try and drown them out...

>--
>*** Matt Korth *** dragon@camelot.bradley.edu *** dragon@buhub.bradley.edu ***
>You are confused.  Black does not represent evil.  Black represents
>anxiety.  Sen. Jesse Helms represents evil.
>
>			--the Omniscient Usenet Oracle

	-Phil
Newsgroups: alt.activism
From: alamma@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Munir A. Alam)
Subject: Info. on Ray Luc Levasseur, anyone ?
Summary: Need info on him. 
Keywords: Need info. 
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 08:11:57 GMT

Could someone please post some info on Ray Luc Levasseur ? 
 He was a revolutionary immigrant from Canada, jailed in 
1984 as part of the 'Ohio 7'. A victim of repression and 
presently in a Hartford prison.  
 
Post or e-mail. Thanks.....

alamma@logic.camp.clarkson.edu

-                                                                -
"Governments benefit the Governors at the expense of the Governed"
                          - The Zinja Manual
-                                                                -

Xref: sparky alt.activism:7327 alt.censorship:3183 talk.politics.misc:17167 talk.politics.mideast:10365
From: rjc@cstr.ed.ac.uk (Richard Caley)
Newsgroups: alt.activism
Subject: Re: Help stop the KKK
Date: 15 Apr 92 20:50:55 GMT
Organization: Centre for Speech Technology Research


I agree it is obviously not a constitutiponal issue unless the police
get involved but...

In article <1992Apr14.073942.1@mdcbbs.com>, J.M. Ivler ivler@mdcbbs.com (jii) writes:

jii> So, why doesn't the second group just join the first and shout
jii> these hatemongers down!

Because it is childish and stupid. Feel free to be childish, but I
think it is quite reasonable that people try to point out that a
course of action is going to aid those you claim to opose.

--
rjc@cogsci.ed.ac.uk			_O_
					 |<
Newsgroups: alt.activism
From: mpd@anomaly.sbs.com (Michael P. Deignan)
Subject: Re: worse than mailing lists
Organization: Small Business Systems, Incorporated, Esmond, RI  02917
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 21:56:25 GMT

ddc1@jaguar.uofs.edu writes:

>	My favorite thing to do with Business reply envelopes that I get from
>politicians who I don't agree with is te get a box and fill it with rocks and
>tape the envelope to it and drop it in the mail box. It's considerably more
>expensive than just returning the envelope and INFINATELY more fun! 8-}

And accomplishes nothing except adding to the garbage in your local landfill, 
since all the post office does is throw out the box.

MD
-- 
--  Michael P. Deignan                      / 
--  Domain: mpd@anomaly.sbs.com            /   I'm not a bigot,
--    UUCP: ...!uunet!rayssd!anomaly!mpd  /    I hate everyone.
-- Telebit: +1 401 455 0347              / 
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.individualism,talk.politics.misc
From: cwinkler@oregon.uoregon.edu (Celia Winkler)
Subject: Re: Socialism Security Rides Again
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Oregon
Date:  9 Apr 1992 20:40 PDT  

In article <1992Apr9.163017.1768@unislc.uucp>, lae@unislc.UUCP (Leslie Evans,B2C10,5383) writes...
>In article <rdippold.702582849@cancun> rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold) writes:
>>The things the newspaper brings.  A heroin addict was arrested with a
>>bag of about $5000 in cash.  She claimed the police couldn't
>>confisticate it because it wasn't drug money, it was what was left of
>>a lump-sum $8000 check from Social Security.
>>
>>The police checked, and sure enough.  If you are an acoholic or a drug
>>addict, Social Security classifies you as "disabled" and will support
>>your drug habit to the tune of $625 dollars a month.
>>
> 
>Hmmm, my mother is one of those "decrepit old people" you spoke about,
>and she only receives a little over $400, and she worked almost 50
>years of her life.  She should have stayed home and been an alkie
>instead.

Just a little clarification:

1)  The size of your Social Security check is dependent on former 
earnings, figured in a pretty complicated way.  In any event, it is
figured so that people who work at low paid jobs (especially 
part time) get less than people who work for a short period at 
higher paid jobs.  So, if you are an elderly woman who has 
worked at minimum wage and part time jobs all her life,
chances are you'll get less than someone who made good money and
then became disabled.

2)  It is REALLY hard to get Social Security Disability based on
alcoholism or drug addiction.  You have to have really done a
good job in destroying your brain first.  This info is based on
my experience trying to get OASDI benefits for an alcoholic.  We
went back and forth between the Social Security office and federal
court a couple of times before she finally got the benefits.  And
this was a woman with significant organic brain damage due to drinking.

This might explain why that woman was carrying around $5000 in a
bag.  

Sounds like you might want to trade places with her?  Be my guest.
I guarantee you will not like the life.

cw

Newsgroups: alt.activism
From: cmort@NCoast.ORG (Christopher Morton)
Subject: Re: RESOURCE: Vegetarianism,Animal Rights,Ecology,World Hunger,Rainforests
Reply-To: cmort@ncoast.org (Christopher Morton)
Organization: North Coast Public Access *NIX, Cleveland, OH
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 19:15:32 GMT
Followup-To: alt.activism

As quoted from <1992Apr6.154755.3646@ssd.kodak.com> by young@sasquatch.serum.kodak.com (Rich Young (x37176)):

> 	For those who are convinced that I am selective in criticizing only
> 	vegetarian extremism, let me point out that the above exchange is
> 	a perfect example of a post from an omnivore which should be summarily
> 	relegated to the same trash heap.

I'm glad you enjoyed it! :)

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------  

"Well whose opinions did you THINK these were...?" 
------------------------------------------------------------------  
Xref: sparky alt.activism:7831 alt.censorship:3383 alt.conspiracy:6458 talk.politics.misc:18563
From: pfaust@b-cpu.UUCP (Pete Faust)
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.censorship,alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc
Subject: HOLOCAUST MYTHS
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 10:25:56 PDT
Organization: Banished CPU, +1(503) 232-6566

     Well, Zionist pressure is again stirring to deny
Banished CPU access.  With the Usenet exception, the Mass
Media is nearly 100% under Zionist control, so why allow the
exception?  Certain truths must not be sent 'round the world,
don't you all know that?  Revisionists would NEVER admit the
hopelessness and inevitable collapse of their position by
silencing their opposition.
     As the Zionists suggest when they present to the
American public their nation-wide, nation-destroying Mass
Media programs; when offended, simply change channels or turn
off.  Should this not be the Usenet modus operandi?
 
     Side remark:  Holocausters continue quoting from books
and other material, full of lies and misleading, deceiving
material.  A mass media debate or, better still, a series of
mass media debates by the most knowledgeable, on both sides,
would expose their lies and deception.  This obviously is why
there is no debate, at any cost.
 
Pete Faust
Institute for Relearning

-.-
Banished CPU supports FREEDOM OF SPEECH.  Currently no fees.
CALL:  +1(503) 232-6566 (8N1, v.32/42/bis) or +1(503) 232-5783 (8N1)
UUCP:  Path (..twiki!b-cpu) "ELIMINATED" BY ZIONIST THOUGHT POLICE!!!
Users of Banished CPU are solely responsible for their actions.
From: Frank Scofi <fscofi@igc.org>
Newsgroups: alt.activism
Date: 09 Apr 92 12:48 PDT
Subject: SUPPORT DHORUBA BIN-WAHAD IN COURT
Nf-ID: #N:cdp:1296500174:000:1547
Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!fscofi    Apr  9 12:48:00 1992





             **************************************
             DHORUBA NEEDS YOU TO SHOW UP IN COURT!
             **************************************



Although it has been more than 2  years since Dhoruba Bin-Wahad won
his release on March 22, 1990, his life still hangs in the balance.
This former leader of the Black Panther Party now faces re-
imprisonment. On December 19, 1991, the highest Court in NY State
reinstated Dhoruba's conviction. The Court basically condoned
political persecution and rewarded NY law enforcement agencies for
illegally withholding evidence. Dhoruba was framed by the FBI and
NYC Police Department as part of their racist Counter-Intelligence
Program  (COINTELPRO) aimed at silencing Black militant dissent. As
a result, Dhoruba spent 19 years in prison for something he did not
do. If the Manhattan District Attorney has its way, he will be
returned to prison for the rest of his life. Dhoruba's fight for
justice is our fight for justice.  Our presence in the Court lets
them know that we are watching and sends a signal that we care.
They want us to lose interest so they can do their dirty deeds out
of the public eye. But we cannot afford to get tired for we are our
own liberators.


     SHOW UP! DEMAND AN END TO HIS RACIST, POLITICAL FRAMEUP!
                 THURSDAY - APRIL 16TH AT 9:00 A.M.
              100 CENTRE STREET - 11th Floor - Part 30



For further Information contact: (718) 624-0800

CAMPAIGN TO FREE BLACK POLITICAL PRISONERS & P.O.W.s
P.O. BOX 339
BRONX, NEW YORK 10463-0339
From: STella@thelema.uucp (STella)
Newsgroups: alt.activism
Subject: Re: Celebrating National Meatout Day
Date: 8 Apr 92 23:00:33 GMT
Organization: Idiosyncratic Anarchic Order

In article <ac.34@apmaths.uwo.ca> ac@apmaths.uwo.ca (alka chandna) writes:
>s - a good reference for facts related to this is Jeremy Rifkin's 
                          ?????                    !!!!!f !!!!!!!

So when did Rifkin start doing facts rather than demagoguery?  News to me.

Carnivores you'll never guilt-trip are giggling at the idea of dear
Jeremy as a source of facts.

ST*
Newsgroups: alt.activism
From: aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer)
Subject: Re: Despite Gov't Siege, Christic Vows to Pursue Murderers of Pres. Kennedy
Keywords: Criminals within the U.S. Government retaliate against Christic Inst.
Organization: Evil Geniuses for a Better Tomorrow
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 18:57:39 GMT

In article <1992Apr6.172711.21554@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> jad@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (John DiNardo) writes:

>It began in June, 1988 with Judge King's politically-charged summary
>judgment order preventing our La Penca case from going to a jury.

For those of you who are new to the net, a "politically-charged summary
judgement" is any court ruling that the Christic Institute does not
agree with.

   Allen
-- 
+          They're just jealous because they don't have three               +
|          wise men and a virgin in the whole organization                  |
|     --Vincent Cianci on the ACLU suit to remove a nativity scene          |
+----------------------397 DAYS TO FIRST FLIGHT OF DCX----------------------+