Original_To:  BITNET%"libref-l@kentvm"
Approved-By:  Diane Kovacs <DKOVACS@KENTVM.KENT.EDU>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.libref-l
Date:         Sun, 24 Jan 1993 12:21:01 EDT
From:         S_NATALE%TWU.BITNET@Kentvm.Kent.edu
Subject:      Larry Schankman speaks the Truth!
Comments: To: libref-l@kentvm.kent.edu

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Folks, I can't hold my silence anymore.  I feel that Larry Schankman basically
said it all in the two paragraphs that I've copied below this message.

I think that we must all understand that the paradigm of our profession is
evolving through a stage that is revolutionary and INDEED necessary, and thank
God for the evolution; we can only better ourselves by approaching the
inevitable changes in information access. Professional development is a
responsibility that none of us can AFFORD to overlook if we value the integrity
of the profession itself.

Larry, you have a fan!

  ___________________________________________________________________________
 |  What looks large from a distance close up is never that big.             |
 |                                          -- Bob Dylan                     |
 |___________________________________________________________________________|
 |   __\/__                                                                  |
 |  (      )    Joe Natale                        *****                      |
 | [--O--O--]   Access Librarian                    *   *   *   *            |
 |  \\\--///    Mary Evelyn Blagg-Huey Library      *    * * * *  *   *      |
 |    \\//      Texas Woman's University                  *   *   *   *      |
 |              P. O. Box 23715                                   *****      |
 |              Denton, Texas  76204-1715                                    |
 |                                                                           |
 | VOICE (817) 898-3709        BITNET s_natale@twu                           |
 |   FAX (817) 898-3726      INTERNET s_natale@twu.edu                       |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Larry's excerpted message:

                                                 ...Unfortunately, I fear
that there is a dangerous reactionary fringe in our profession, and I've
seen this everywhere. To many, the suggestion that they should learn new
technologies, skills, or even sources of (print) information is seen as
condescending, provocative and insulting.  They feel perfectly
comfortable with their present ken of knowledge, and perhaps, quite
comfortable with their present level of public service (the ethic that
the patron gets what's easily available, and nothing else -- and they
should be happy for that much).

Perhaps this resentment directly relates to the number of years the
suggestor has on the job (i.e. years out of Library School).  But this
raises an entirely different issue which concerns me: the comparison of
the net worth of obsolete experience (quantity) to a good working
knowledge of emerging technologies and new sources (quality). But this
issue is probably inflammatory and not relevant here.  [editorial ?]

As an example, on the night of Clinton's inauguration several nodes made
the text of his speech available. Now most librarians would feel perfectly
fine should the question arise and they answer: sorry we can't help you.
But informing those librarians that the text is available via Internet not
only makes them feel badly for not knowing the source, but worse, raises
an entirely squirmish moral issue: the next time the question arises,
should they admit to the patron that they do not know how to access that
text (thus appearing less than competent); should they try to learn how to
access it themselves (with the obvious need for learning a new skill which
they may not wish to dedicate time towards); or should they simply deny
the text altogether thus avoiding the issue completely.

What frightens me about this profession is that I've known several
librarians who not only practice the latter method of *public service*,
but would actually resent anyone who suggested the use of the Internet (or
any new source) in the first place.  After all, such information has
forced them into the dilemma of choosing to learn a new skill or declining
to help a patron (knowing that help was available -- whereas before they
would have declined with a perfectly clear conscience).


I realize I'm a bit cynical, but I have this burning passion for servicing
the patron, in the most timely manner. I further believe that as
*professional information specialists* we should constantly and regularly
sharpen our skills to assure such service. Hence, the Internet for reference.

I welcome further discussion.

Larry Schankman
Valdosta State College
E-Mail: lschank@grits.valdosta.peachnet.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU