HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: yung@r-node.gts.org (Amos Yung)
Subject: Re: OS/2 - How much memory are you guys using?
Organization: R-Node Public Access UNIX System (416-636-2026) - 24 hrs
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 03:36:05 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.042707.22049@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> ujabanco@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (John Abanco) writes:
>
>I've got 4 Megs. I installed my free copy (from COMDEX) on my machine
>once, and found disk access HORENDOUS. Someone told me that you need 6
>Megs to do okay, and 8 Megs to run it good. 

Gosh.. You too? I am running OS/2 2.0 on a 386-33 w/4M RAM and, putting
it mildly, it is not as snappy as I would like. While the compatiability
with DOS and Windows app is extremely impressive, it is not a "better DOS
than DOS, better Windows than Windows" in terms of performance.

>
>So my question is to those people out there running OS/2 v2.0 right now.
>How much memory do *you* have on your machine, and how often does it do
>disk access after you get the OS/2 Workplace Shell (WPS)?
>

A LOT. I would venture a guess that if you intends to use the Windows and
DOS window frequently, 4 Meg is not a feasible configuration. Up it to 8,
things might start to happen then.

>
>
>-- 
>--My life is such a mess,I end  | INTERNET: ujabanco@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu
>  up typing.... umop apisdn.    | FIDONET :
>        John Abanco             | john.abanco@f769.n115.z1.fidonet.org 
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amos Yung          | Macintosh Jr.: The power to crush the other kid.
yung@r-node.gts.org| 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: tomho@microunity.com (Tom Ho)
Subject: Office automation
Organization: MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
Distribution: ca
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 16:25:40 GMT

I try to computerize a doctor office and I am seeking advice on what softwares 
and hardwares to purchase.

Preferences:

*Like to stick with the PC platform.
*Have at least 2 PCs at office and one at home.
*Like to be able to communicate between PCs (networking capability 
required?)
*Will need to do electronic billings (through modem).
*An user-friendly database software to keep track of about 20k records.

Ability:

*Fairly computer literate:  comfortable with setting up hardwares and messing 
around with popular applications on PC.
*Don't know much about medical database software.
*Don't know much about networking or PC connectivity.

Questions:

*Do I need to deal with networking issues for the PCs at the office?  If so, any 
recommendation on the softwares?
recommendation on the softwares?  
*Any suggestions on a good medical database software and a friendly general 
database software that can handle the above requirements.
*Any suggestions for a good communication software so that one can work at 
home via modem (I heard of PCAnywhere.  Is this an appropriate software for 
the task?).

Since this is a fairly general question for anybody who want to computerize a 
small office environment, I will summarize and post it if I receive sufficient 
responses.  BTW, if this is considred a FAQ, should I send the summary (if 
there'll be one) to whoever in charge of handling FAQs?  Who would that be?

Thanks!
--
     Tom Ho       tomho@microunity.com       (408) 734-8100
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: sanjeev@cheme.tn.cornell.edu
Subject: Stacker info needed.
Reply-To: sanjeev@cheme.tn.cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell University School of Chemical Engineering
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1992 04:01:02 GMT

Hi,
    I am looking for a disk compressor(stacker or superstor 2.0).
    If anyone has experience with both please advise on which
    one is better.

    Specifically,
	1. Can I compress RAM disk with either of these?
	2. Can I compress a floppy drive? (My laptop's 720K drive
	   could use it!)

Thanks in advance.
    sanjeev
From: k33847k@taltta.hut.fi (Bahaaddin Ahrari)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Font Generators
Date: 14 Apr 92 14:47:32 GMT
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland

Hello everyone,


I am trying to find a font generator that would let you freely
create your own characters (e.g. Arabic/Persian) and preferably
save it under the Borland .chr format. I have a simple, font
generator made by Borland but it won't let you use curved lines
in the character definition. Is anyone aware of such a utility
(commercial or shareware)? Any pointers are much appreciated.

         Thanks.
Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.apps:2803 comp.os.msdos.programmer:5291 comp.windows.ms:12175 comp.windows.ms.programmer:5315
From: jonas@udac.uu.se (Jonas Fogelberg)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.windows.ms,comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Re: MS C/C++ v7 - need info
Date: 10 Apr 92 07:01:10 GMT
Organization: UDAC, Uppsala University, Sweden

In article <10125@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> gtj@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au (Glenn T Jayaputera) writes:

>Hi..
>  I am thinking to buy MS C/C++ v7.  I would like to program in C++ and for
>  windows apps.  I am wondering if MS C/C++ v7 contains EVERYTHING that one
>  needs to build a windows program.
>  Do I need to buy SDK again??
>  What is the latest version of SDK?? v4 or v3.1?

>many thanks in any kind of pointers


> _--_|\     Glenn Jayaputera
>/      \    gtj@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au 
>\_.--._/    Dept. of Computer Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology 
>      v     Melbourne, Australia 


Yes, MSC/C++ 7.0 system includes everything you need to develop Windows 
applications. According to an information leaflet I received from 
Microsoft a few days ago, the system includes the following tools/utilities 
for Windows development:

- Image Editor
- Dialog Editor
- Font Editor
- Help Compiler
- DLL import library builder
- Resource compiler
- Symbol table maker
- Debug information compactor
- Windows debugger
- Library Manager
- Linker
- Windows header files
- Microsoft Source Profiler
- Microsoft Foundation Class Library

You need at least a 386 with 4 MB of RAM and 20-27 MB of disk aswell...

I doubt then that you need the SDK. It is propably provided for those who 
buy third party C or C++ compilers and want to develop for Windows.

Jonas

--
Just my own personal humble opinions...
Jonas Fogelberg, UDAC (Uppsala University Computing Centre), Sweden.
EMAIL: jonas.fogelberg@udac.uu.se. PHONE: +46 18187878. FAX: +46 18187770.
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.windows.ms,comp.windows.news,comp.windows.misc
From: bm@cs.columbia.edu (Blair MacIntyre)
Subject: comp.windows.news is NOT for Windows news.
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 15:10:37 GMT

It's for discussions about the NeWS window system.  Since it is not
obvious from the group name (thanks to the lack of mixed case), I
thought I'd just post this little reminder.

I doubt most of you care one bit about NeWS.  Probably as little as I
(or the other readers of comp.windows.news) care about Windows, OS/2, or
any related topics, such as the article I grabbed the above Newgroups
line from:
 
	*** DR DOS 6.0 NOW WINDOWS 3.1 COMPATIBLE ***

	(oh, big deal, I'm all goose-bumpy just thinking about it.  
	 Hold me back.  Please.  Ya, right)

Have a nice day.
--
Blair MacIntyre, bm@cs.columbia.edu
Professional Student, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University
From: corpron@hri.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Wanted: Lotus 1-2-3 "benchmarks"
Keywords: Lotus, 125, performance, compatibility
Date: 7 Apr 92 18:27:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: bigbird.6225
Reply-To: corpron@hri.com
Organization: Horizon Research, Inc.

I have the honor of testing the compatibility and performance of 
Lotus 1-2-3 on different platforms (DOS and UNIX).  Does anyone
out there have a set of benchmarking and/or compatibility validation 
spreadsheets that I can have?

Thanks one and all!

Dan R. Corpron			UUCP: ...bbn!hri.com!corpron
Horizon Research, Inc.		INET: corpron@hri.com
1432 Main Street		(617) 466-8315
Waltham, MA 02154
From: wanderer@athena.mit.edu (Opus)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: $50 for an UPGRADE!!!!!
Date: 14 Apr 92 23:36:35 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology


|> 
|> 	I think I was had.  I'm not impressed (with Win 3.1), and may start to
|> seriously consider OS/2.  The only problem with that is that it is an IBM 
|> product, and they have a horrible track record where operating systems are 
|> concerned.  (How many failed RISCs?)

well I've had os/2 2.0 for awhile, and it works pretty well..
anyway, RISC is an architecture, not an operating system.
From: int588u@mdw036.cc.monash.edu.au (Mike Grasso)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: HOT NEWS! DOS 5.1 + STACKER....
Date: 9 Apr 92 00:09:16 GMT
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.

cee1@ra.msstate.edu (Charles Evans) writes:

>Just read in a slightly coupla-week old InfoWord or was it computerworld
>whatever, March 23, 1992 issue. Back page.

>Microsoft has announced it will add stacker to its MS-DOS 5.1 which should
>be rolling out Sept/Oct 1992.

>They said, they are because that it 'runs so well with DOS 5.0'

>... maybe they will also add little novelties like renaming directories..
>... true moving of files
>... change to any subdirectly without haveing to type a long path
>... end the 640K barrier
>... [seems like DOS might be doing this just to catch up with DR-DOS 6.0
>     and its data compression on the fly.]
>... countless other things that DOS should have.. how about a REAL
>    ANSI.SYS driver

It's interesting that dear Microsoft are going to do this...I seem to remember
reading in an issue of Communique (the Microsoft propaganda magazine) an article
that absolutely bagged DR DOS for using compressed volumes!! Some of their
reasons were that such hard-drives would be incompatible with other machines
(and - oh yes Mr Microsoft - that's a big issue too!:) and that it was
extremely error prone. There's an eight letter word which describes this - it's
a noun and it relates to the solid waste material that a male cow produces.

I have been happily using DR DOS with the Super Store thingy for several months
now, and I have had now trouble at all. I congratulate Microsoft for realising
that they were wrong in their critisism of DR DOS. Such humility and meekness
is sadly missing from the computing world today. Now, of course, I expect that
Microsoft will publish an apology to DRI for some of the other lies that they
made about DR DOS in that article.

.\\ike
"We're all a-goin' crazy and we're going today"
	Status Quo
From: jcmorris@mwunix.mitre.org (Joe Morris)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: HP LaserJet and Windows
Date: 1 Apr 92 16:41:21 GMT
Organization: The MITRE Corporation

btd@IASTATE.EDU (Benjamin T Dehner) writes:

>In article <191@bsc835bsc.edu>, jbaxter@bsc835bsc.edu (Jerrel C. Baxter)
>writes:
>> In article <JKF.92Mar29211102@frisky.Franz.COM>, jkf@Franz.COM (Sean Foderaro)
>writes:
>> > 
>> >  I just purchased an HP LaserJet IIp plus and I'm surprised that the Write 
>> > wordprocessor that comes with Windows 3.0 doesn't know about the built-in 
>> > fonts in the printer.   As a result all I've got are the lousy fonts that  
>> > come with windows.  

>	[other stuff...]
>> 
>>   From what I know of Microsoft Windows 3.1 (due 4/6/92) it will similarly
>>   perform font substitution for its built-in TrueType font support.  Note
>                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>	Wrong.  I just ordered Win 3.1; the form claimed $50 for the upgrade
>and another $50 for the TrueType package.  You can make of this as you will --
>either a $100 for the upgrade, or a Microsoft ploy to better screw the customer
>by selling them seperate -- but the TrueType package does NOT come built in to 
>Windoze 3.1.

Wrong.  Read the upgrade solicitation: what you get for the extra $50 
is a package of *additional* TrueType fonts.  The TrueType engine is
part of the basic Windows 3.1 package, along with a few TrueType fonts
(Arial, Courier, Symbol, Times, WingDing).

Getting back to the original posting, I have no experience with the IIP
printer, but I would be surprised if there are *any* printer fonts 
shipped with Windows 3.0 for the printer.  Since the Windows 3.0 setup
knows about the printer and calls up HPPCL.DRV as the interface, I
expect that if it's been set up properly you should be able to use
whatever typefaces are resident there...who on the net can report just
what faces *are* part of the base IIP product?

One quick way to see what fonts Windows thinks are available on a
printer is to open Windows Write, point it at the printer in question,
then open the FONTS dialog.  Select in turn each font offered in
the left-hand box, and note which ones offer at least one point size
in the right-hand scroll box.  These are the ones which Windows believes
to be available in the printer.

Joe Morris
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Nota Bene conversion
From: turo1953@kauri.vuw.ac.nz (Arthur Pomeroy)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 01:39:28 GMT
Organization: Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

A colleague has a number of files produced by a word processing
package called Nota Bene. I am looking for some way to transfer
these files to a more 'standard' word processing package, such
as Word Perfect, keeping as much as the formatting as possible.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks, 
Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.apps:2775 comp.os.msdos.misc:3091
From: v116r8ac@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Chris Nasipak)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Looking for a KEYSTACK with pause
Date: 8 Apr 92 21:50:00 GMT
Organization: United Nations Intelligence Taskforce
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Apr8.131802.16744@fs7.ece.cmu.edu>, winstead@faraday.ece.cmu.edu (Charles Holden Winstead) writes...
>Hey All,
> 
>Is there a public domain utility which works like the 4dos keystack, but 
>allows a time delay?  Specifically, I'm trying to set up my modem program
>(Procomm) to dial school and login for me, but I need it to wait about
>1min after dialing the number to get the "connect 2400" signal before it goes
>on.  Alternatively, is there another utility which might let me specify input
>to a program as if I'm sitting there typing it in myself?
> 
>Thanks,
> 
>-Chuck

Why not simply have the keystack activate a Procomm script file?
That will do what you want, and I use it myself on my pc.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you really feel like    |         Not Croaker           |Somewhere else, the
arguing with a can of      |                               |tea is getting cold.
deoderant that registers   | v116r8ac@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu |Come on - we've got
nine on the Richter Scale? |   nasipak@acsu.buffalo.edu    | work to do.
        --- Ace            |                               |  --- Doctor Who
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I wasn't expecting the ReichsInspektor General."  -- General Strasser
"No One expects the Reichsinspektor General." -- Doctor Who, TimeWyrm:Exodus
From: knichola@phad.hsc.usc.edu (Karl Nicholas)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Paradox bombs after installing Win 3.1
Date: 15 Apr 1992 10:38:55 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: phad.hsc.usc.edu

One of my users installed Win 3.1.  He now finds that Paradox 3.5, blows up with a Paradox internal error when he edits a database.  This happens when running
Paradox as in a DOS window under 3.1 or when run straight from DOS.  

Has anyone else had a similar problem?

Since I can't get through to Borland on the telephone, does anyone have
Borland's Internet address, and do they respond to posts for help.

 

 
D
 :


Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.apps:2838 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:7473 comp.os.msdos.misc:3164 comp.windows.ms:12493 comp.windows.news:254 comp.windows.misc:755
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.windows.ms,comp.windows.news,comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: *** DR DOS 6.0 NOW WINDOWS 3.1 COMPATIBLE ***
From: gilf@vms.huji.ac.il (GIL FREUND)
Date: 11 Apr 1992 13:52 IDT
Distribution: world
Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Keywords: DRDOS DR DOS WIN3.1 DRDOS6 DRDOS6.0 6.0 3.1 WIN WINDOWS WIN31
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    Lines: 21

In article <SSJHBL3Y@dri.com>, btannen@dri.com (Bob Tannen) writes...
>The Novell Desktop Systems Group (formerly Digital Research) is committed to
>bringing you the very latest features for your DR DOS 6.0 operating system in
>the form of free quarterly updates.  The Business Update Service for the month
>of April includes all of the files necessary for Windows 3.1 support.  These
>files and the information needed for Windows 3.1 support are AVAILABLE NOW!
>The FULL update will be sent to registered users shortly.  To download the
>Windows 3.1 specific files NOW call: 408-649-3443 (96/2400 N81) and for a
>limited time only (to support the large volume of calls): 408-649-3516 (24/1200)
>They will also be available on Compuserve (GO DRFORUM) shortly.
>
>
I am currently using Windows 3.1 and DR-DOS 6.0 and I havn't noticed any
problem. I also use QEMM 6.01, and 4DOS 4.0. Is there any specific danger?

Gil.

P.S. Will these upgrades be also availble through Internt routes? I am
in Israel, and dailing to the US is an expensive bussiness.

Gil
From: tbaker@tomspc.UUCP (Thomas Baker)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: Windows 3.1 -- Confirm or deny?
Date: 6 Apr 92 00:20:10 GMT
Organization: TOM'S PC BBS

berger@atropa (Mike Berger) writes:

> I just think it's silly and naive to
> think this problem doesn't happen on every other machine (and in
> my experience, it's far worse on a Mac).

Tell me about it.  And after you do upgrade, the stuff that is supposed to work
with system 7.0 still gives you "bad f-line" errors all the time.  Windows is
much more stable for me.  And I can get alot more MSDOS machines for the same
money as a comparable Mac.


--
tbaker@tomspc.UUCP (Thomas Baker)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: mulcihy@sweetpea.jsc.nasa.gov (David Mulcihy 283-4279)
Subject: Re: REDUCING .EXE file size
Organization: nasa-jsc
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 17:46:50 GMT

Free the memory you malloc. If that is not the problem, I am out of ideas.
David Mulcihy
mulcihy@sweetpea.jsc.nasa.gov
From: hms@sei.cmu.edu (Howard Slomer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: SuperStor 2.0
Keywords: SuperStor
Date: 7 Apr 92 12:46:37 GMT
Organization: The Software Engineering Institute



	A friend of mine has a small Toshiba lap-top computer with 640k, 20M HD
and a single 3.5 floppy.  He bought a copy of SuperStor V2.0 from an Egghead
salesman who claimed that SuperStor would solve his disk space problems.  

	Has anyone tried this program on this type of system?  Can this
program be recommended for a novice user?

			Thanks in advance,
			Howard
From: holzman@sequent.com (Alan Holzman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Insta-Calc Spreadsheet ?
Summary: How good is product, company ?
Keywords: Insta-Calc,spreadsheet
Date: 10 Apr 92 16:53:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: sequent.1992Apr10.165357.15496
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems, Inc.


	I've been trying out Insta-Calc Version 3. On my Tosh 1000SE, it
works well and seems pretty solid. Doesn't take up much disk or memory (which
is a godsend on the T100SE).

	Before I send in a shareware fee, I was wondering about other folks
reactions to this spreadsheet program and the company (FormalSoft of 
Sandy, Utah) ???

	Is there service and support pretty good ? Have they had free updates
to the program on a timely basis ? Is the Insta-Calc spreadsheet program
itself considered a pretty good deal ? Shareware fee is $ 49 plus $ 5 shipping.

Thanks for your comments ...

- Alan

-- 
Alan Holzman					Phone =	(503) 578-5184
Operating Systems Product Line Manager		FAX = (503) 578-9890 
Sequent Computer Systems Inc.			Internet = holzman@sequent.com
15450 SW Koll Pkwy,  Beaverton, OR. 97006       UUCP = ...!sequent!holzman
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: A personal perspective on choosing OS/2 2.0
From: ctw@qopus.uucp (ctw)
Date: 15 Apr 92 20:02:58 GMT
Organization: QOPUS (Bowling Green, Ohio)

Doug Dougherty gurgled at All on <15 Apr 92>:

 DD>         4) Compatible with all my old apps (and I do mean old - the
 DD>            modem program that I use was assembled in 1985, and it is
 DD> still the best communications program I have ever seen anywhere, for
 DD> any platform) I.e., when I want a good old DOS command line prompt to

I was just wondering what comm program this might be.  I, myself, haven't
found anything that's better than Telemate (v3.01).

ttfn/ctw

--  
Christopher A. Tweney / Email: ctw%qopus@gantz.bowlgreen.oh.us
USNAIL: 622 Morton, Bowling Green, Ohio 43402
{$}
I will not be held responsible for the opinions of my computer.
Xref: sparky comp.os.msdos.apps:2808 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:7409 comp.os.msdos.misc:3125 comp.windows.ms:12221 comp.windows.news:249 comp.windows.misc:741
From: root@tamuts.tamu.edu (Wally Strzelec)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.windows.ms,comp.windows.news,comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: *** DR DOS 6.0 NOW WINDOWS 3.1 COMPATIBLE ***
Keywords: DRDOS DR DOS WIN3.1 DRDOS6 DRDOS6.0 6.0 3.1 WIN WINDOWS WIN31
Date: 10 Apr 92 17:00:39 GMT
Followup-To: comp.os.msdos.apps
Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station


I have put these patches up in anon ftp at tamsun.tamu.edu.  They are
located in ~ftp/pub/drdos.  I installed them and Windows 3.1 went
straight in without any problems.  Make sure that you read the readme
files first.

Thank you Novell Desktop Systems Group.  
		-A very satisfied customer!

 Wally Strzelec
 Texas A&M University
 packman@tamuts.tamu.edu


In article <SSJHBL3Y@dri.com> btannen@dri.com (Bob Tannen) writes:
>The Novell Desktop Systems Group (formerly Digital Research) is committed to
>bringing you the very latest features for your DR DOS 6.0 operating system in
>the form of free quarterly updates.  The Business Update Service for the month
>of April includes all of the files necessary for Windows 3.1 support.  These 
>files and the information needed for Windows 3.1 support are AVAILABLE NOW!
>The FULL update will be sent to registered users shortly.  To download the 
>Windows 3.1 specific files NOW call: 408-649-3443 (96/2400 N81) and for a 
>limited time only (to support the large volume of calls): 408-649-3516 (24/1200)
>They will also be available on Compuserve (GO DRFORUM) shortly.
>
>
>----
>Bob Tannen                        Novell/Desktop Systems Group
>btannen@dri.com                   Box DRI
>BTANNEN @ NOVELL  (MHS)           70 Garden Court
>                                  Monterey, CA 93942











Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
From: lindemaj@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Andrew J Lindeman)
Subject: Qemm v6.02 and Stacker 2.0
Keywords: qemm 6.02 stacker 2.0
Reply-To: lindemaj@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Andrew J Lindeman)
Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 19:10:44 GMT

Okay, if this is a FAQ, please let me know (kindly!)

I just bought Qemm 6.02 and am trying to install it with my Stacked hard drive.   
My problem is that the document which comes with Stacker, showing how to use  
Qemm's Optimize, is applicable to Qemm 5.xx.  It tells what to do in comparison  
with the "steps" in Optimize, but for v5.xx!  I've tried to follow with Qemm  
6.02 guessing where all the "steps" would be, but I haven't had any luck.   
Everytime, when I try and copy some of the files to my unstacked drive, some of  
the files called for aren't there.  Also, Optimize for 6.02 doesn't have the  
"steps" listed on the screen (I'm guessing that 5.xx had "step 1,2,3" on the  
screen when it got to each point.)  If anybody could put together a quick guide  
on what to do, or mail me a copy of the FAQ if it's in there, I would be very  
appreciative!  One other question, where would the best place to put Qemm: my  
DOS drive or my Stacked drive?

Thanks in advance, Andy Lindeman

lindemaj@rosevc.rose-hulman.edu  <- preferred address
lindemaj@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu