From: pvanmeur@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Pim van Meurs)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush is such a bad loser
Date: 6 Nov 92 19:51:42 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <1992Nov5.202552.12421@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> mk009b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu ([Matt Kaufman]) writes:
>
>Hold on a minute here.  Maybe its just me but where does someone who
>probably spent election night kissing a picture of Ted Kennedy mistake the

At least it didn't leave a bad taste in my mouth compared to the
ones who are kissing Rush's's ass.

>point that Rush is making.  The point of there being a victory for
>conservaitves is true.

Of course it's true, we have a democratic House, Congress and
president. We have Hershensohn losing to a lightweigth like Boxer,
we have Wilson losing on his welfare proposition 165, we have
democrats gaining a larger number of representatives in the state
assembly. Bush is out, even Gore got a higher approval rating in
Indiana (Quayle country) than the "vp not long to be" himself.
People have voted for healthcare, economic reforms, taxing of
>200.000, pro-choice... Need I go on ?
>
>Let's look at those surveys taken by ABC television network for starters,
>and for the the idea of term limits, and finish up with a quick look at the
>next four years.

Term limits are conservative ?>

>For starters Rush on TV last nught brought up a very good point about how
>the American people were not necessarily voting for a change in the policies
>of government but for a change in the man doing the governing.  The liberal
>elites have misjudged their token electoral victory by claiming that there
>is a mandate for change.  Well if there is keep in mind that Americans vote
>their pockets.  If taxes go up we shall see if Mr.  CLinton is also a one
>term wonder.

Well, at least he has the benifit of the doubt. He has yet to join
the loser ranks of Bush e.a.
People voted for a policy since Bush had none it's hard to say if
they voted for a change in policy.
>
>The future of the conservative movment is in good hands. There are several
>new Quarterbacks on the horizon (hint, hint) Men like JACK KEMP, BOB DOLE
>and WILLIAM WELD are leaders capable of bringing the Regan Revolution to its
>rightful conclusion.  Rush can only aid in their endeavors by speaking the
>truth.

The Reagan revolution has died several years before when everyone
started to understand that excessive spending will not lead to long
term prosperity. Reagunomics are trickling up not down.
Oh yes add Quayle to the list of possible candidates...
Rush never speaks the truth, he himself says so. He is an
entertainer who turned conservative for the short term profit
possibilities. He is the greatest scam ever. He convinces 12
million listeners he is an ultraconservative and starts spreading
funny ideas. Of course the hard core conservative people will follow
their leader without questioning. When he reaches the top of his
'seduction' he writes a book and newsletters and convinces his
'followers' they have to buy it. Voila, another millionaire. 

>
>
>
>
>Remember it is not the size of the victory that has been won, but the level
>of expectations its creates.  
>
>Remember I promise to keep a kosher kitchen in the white house if elected.
>
>Bill Clinton speaking in NYC during the April 7, primary.

remember: read my lips no new taxes.
So you expect a kosher kitchen, before you answer this please get
used to metaphorical statements.

Pim
-- 
Pim van Meurs  UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Mail Code A-030  	 UUCP : ...!ucsd!ssurf.ucsd.edu!VANMEURS
UCSD La Jolla  CA 92093  ARPA : VANMEURS@ssurf.ucsd.edu
(619)-458 9729 Home	 Bitnet : VANMEURS%ssurf.ucsd.edu@sdsc
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh