HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: winter@vision.rs.ch (Martin Winter, RadioSuisse Ltd)
Subject: test
Reply-To: winter@vision.rs.ch
Organization: RadioSuisse Ltd, Berne, Switzerland
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 09:33:33 GMT

Test.... just a test
From: oxendine@pembvax1.pembroke.edu
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
Subject: test
Date: 3 Sep 92 12:42:50 GMT
Organization: Pembroke State University

This is a test-- 

=============================================================================
Terry Oxendine                |      Bitnet:  oxendine@pembvax1.bitnet
Pembroke State University     |    Internet:  oxendine@pembvax1.pembroke.edu
Systems Admin/Prog            |       Voice:  919-521-9793
University Computing and      |   Facsimile:  919-521-1214
 Information Services         |   
Pembroke, NC 28372
=============================================================================
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
From: ghc@vger.niddk.nih.gov
Subject: ignore
Organization: NIH K-LMB, Molecular Structure
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 21:51:36 GMT

ignore
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
From: ghc@vger.niddk.nih.gov
Subject: ignore
Organization: NIH K-LMB, Molecular Structure
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 21:52:14 GMT

ignore
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
From: gravil@piaf4.cern.ch (Eric Gravil)
Subject: testiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Organization: CERN, European Research Center for Particle Physics
Distribution: vmsnet.test
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 13:43:04 GMT

coucouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
Newsgroups: vmsnet.test
From: ghc@vger.niddk.nih.gov
Subject: ignore
Organization: NIH K-LMB, Molecular Structure
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 21:44:53 GMT

ignore
From: "H.A. Kippenhan Jr." <KIPPENHAN@FNDCD.BITNET>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: Lost MAIL.TXT files
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 11:30 CST
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

        Some time back I posted a query about lost MAIL.TXT files
        on a system where MX was running along with TGV MultiNet,
        and Joiner's JNET product.  The list readership offered
        a number of possible sources of the problem, but no real
        resolution (other than doing frequent ANALYZE/REPAIR's).

        I just received this from the people here on site who
        make source kits, patches, etc. available to system
        administrators.  I don't have access to DSNlink, so I can't
        provide any more details about the patch than what appears
        below.  I hope that those of you who were kind enough to
        reply to my original post about this problem find it of
        some interest.

        CSCPAT_1041011

        MAIL_SERVER's code assumes that nothing's going to go wrong between
        the  time  it  creates  the temporary MAIL.TXT file and the time it
        delivers that mail and subsequently  deletes  the  temporary  file.
        This is, of course, a bad assumption.  If, for any reason, the mail
        message delivery is aborted, MAIL_SERVER will neglect to delete the
        MAIL.TXT  file  it  created,  leaving a lost (not pointed to by any
        directory) file on the disk.

        This patch may only be installed on VMS Version(s) 5.4 through 5.5-1.

        Best regards.

        - Kipp -

 {~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}
 { H.A. Kippenhan Jr.               |   Internet:   Kippenhan@FNDCD.FNAL.GOV }
 { Fermi National Accelerator Lab.  |   HEPnet/NSI DECnet:  FNDCD::KIPPENHAN }
 { P.O. Box 500   MS: WH-6W/234     |   BITnet:       Kippenhan@FNDCD.BITNET }
 { Batavia, Illinois 60510          |   Telephone:            (708) 840-8068 }
 {~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
From: GAYNOR@agvax2.ag.ohio-state.edu (Jim Gaynor)
Subject: MX 3.1c and UCX 2.0 - Do they work?
Organization: The Ohio State University - OCES
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 14:17:11 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.23

Hullo all,

Just got ahold of UCX 2.0.  However, I haven't installed it yet. 
Among other things, I'm wondering if MX 3.1c will work properly with
UCX 2.0.  At the moment, I'm running MX 3.0 (and some revision letter
I can't recall right now), and UCX 1.3a.  I figure that if this does
work out, I'll upgrade UCX and MX in one swell foop.  :-)

So, does anyone have any first-hand experience on MX 3.1c and UCX 2.0?

Thanks!


---
   Jim Gaynor    | "Man-of-Many-Beeping-Sounds-and-Flashing-Lights" - KAJ
OSU/ACS/FMS/OCES | <gaynor@agvax2.ag.ohio-state.edu> or <gaynor.4@osu.edu>
ObDiscl:  Everything stated here and above is _my_ opinion.  Mine mine mine!
ObQuote: "Every devil I meet becomes a friend of mine." - Indigo Girls
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
From: rf@cl.cam.ac.uk (Robin Fairbairns)
Subject: Re: Question about MX's capabilities
Reply-To: rf@cl.cam.ac.uk (Robin Fairbairns)
Organization: U of Cambridge, England
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 15:54:44 GMT


In article <01GO0CRDBF9C8WXESG@bodkin.ucg.ie>,
PHYDESBONNET@bodkin.ucg.ie (Joe Desbonnet, UCG Ireland.) writes:
|> Can someone tell me if MX would be useful to me in this situation:
|> 
|> I am looking for an alternative to PMDF for email. My local VAX must
initiate
|> all connections to the remote VAX which is the mail gateway. The
connection is
|> a via a commercial X25 network and the people at the remote node do not want
|> to clock up any network costs delivering mail to me. The remote VAX
is runing
|> a recent version of PMDF. I know both PMDF and MX support SMTP over X25 so I
|> guess it should be possible for both packages to communicate with each
|> other without any problems (?) but can MX be configured so that all email
|> transactions occur without the remote computer initiating connections?

If your X25 connection permits reverse charging (and if PMDF is
capable of asserting it) you could absorb all the call costs that way.

Not, you understand, that I managed to get the X25-smtp working myself
(not my job any more :-( ).
--
Robin (dump Brian Kay) Fairbairns, using the facilities of the U of
Cambridge Computer Lab, for which permission is gratefully acknowledged.
[Well - I'm about to sign off with the Dept of Unemployment... :-)]
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: Reply/From conversion?
From: cooper@aloha.pas.ti.com
Date: 28 Aug 92 14:10:10 EDT
Reply-To: cooper@aloha.pas.ti.com

Hi there,

We have just installed MX3.1, and have gotten some pretty good results with
incoming mail.  But, outgoing mail still has problems with Reply-To's.

Here's the configuration:

We have a feed from the outside world that sends any mail with the
.pas.ti.com domain to a local VAX (called lanai) running MX using the SMTP
protocol.  This node will probably be the only node that talks SMTP (the
rest of them will expect VAXmail.)  Lanai takes that incoming mail, and
runs it through the following rewrite rule:

Rewrite "<{user}@{host}.pas.ti.com>" => "<{user}%{host}@lanai.pas.ti.com>"

Our path looks like this:
	Domain-to-path mappings:
	  Domain="lanai.pas.ti.com", Path=Local
	  Domain="lanai", Path=Local
	  Domain="*.pas.ti.com", Path=Local
	  Domain="*", Path=SMTP

We have no aliases (aliasi? ;^) defined, but we do have automatic
percent-hack enabled.

Incoming mail works just fine.  We can receive mail with no problem, and
the above method seems to work faster in processing than having multiple
rewrite rules and specifying .dnet as the local domain.

Here's the problem  (Judging from the rest of the posts, this is not new):
When I send mail out, the recipient get the famous From: line:

From: <"aloha::cooper"@lanai.pas.ti.com>

Now, we have looked at the two contribution sources for NAME_CONVERSION,
and DOMAIN_EXPANSION.  (BLISS is not our forte.)  But, it looks we would
have to have a name_conversion and a domain expansion to modify the
username, and the local host name.

What we would like to have is the above From: address to be converted to 

From: <cooper@aloha.pas.ti.com>

Does anybody have the same situation, and have written a name_conversion/
domain_expansion routine(s) to do the above?

We only have had a few days exposure to this great package, and we would
like to use it more.  Email or post at your leisure.
-- 
				-- Thaddeus O. Cooper
				(cooper@aloha.pas.ti.com)
---------------------------+----------------------------------------------------
     Texas Instruments     |Disclaimer: Datclaimer, Deeudderclaimer
Process Automation Systems |Right now it's only a notion, but I think I can get
     410 - 785 - 6431      |money to make it into a concept, and then later
                           |turn it into an idea. (Lacey Party Guest-Annie Hall)
From: "Hunter Goatley, WKU" <goathunter@WKUVX1.BITNET>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: MX-LIST Administrivia: Monthly Post
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1992 00:06:30 CDT
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

Last modified:  2-JUL-1992 00:40 01:26 (Created)

Welcome  to  MX-List@WKUVX1.BITNET,  an electronic mailing list established
for the discussion of the Message Exchange mail software.

This is a routine posting you will see from time to time on MX-List.

The  MX-List  archives  are maintained at ARCHIVES@WKUVX1.BITNET.  To get a
copy of any month's postings, send an e-mail message  with  the  body  SEND
MX-List.yyyy-mm  to  ARCHIVES@WKUVX1.BITNET,  where  "yyyy" is the year and
"mm" is the numeric representation of the month.  For example, the  message
SENDME MX-List.1992-04 will send the archives for April 1992.

To  remove  yourself  from  the mailing list, send the following command to
LISTSERV@WKUVX1.BITNET:

  SIGNOFF MX-List

LISTSERV supports a few other commands for your convenience.  The following
commands can be handled automatically by the list processor:

 SIGNOFF MX-List       - to remove yourself from the list
 REVIEW MX-List        - to get a list of subscribers
 QUERY MX-List         - to get the status of your entry on the list
 SET MX-List NOMAIL    - to remain on the list but not receive mail
 SET MX-List MAIL      - to resume receiving mail from the list
 SET MX-List CONCEAL   - to not report your address in a REVIEW
 SET MX-List NOCONCEAL - to report your address in a REVIEW
 SET MX-List REPRO     - to receive posts you make to MX-List
 SET MX-List NOREPRO   - to not receive posts you make to MX-List
 LIST                   - to get a list of mailing lists served by WKUVX1
 HELP                   - to receive a help file

By default, subscriptions are set to MAIL, REPRO, NOCONCEAL.

If  you have any questions, comments, or suggestions about MX-List, please
contact the list owner at the address below.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hunter Goatley, VAX Systems Programmer          goathunter@WKUVX1.BITNET
Western Kentucky University
Academic Computing, STH 226                     (502) 745-5251
Bowling Green, KY 42101
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: bg@dymaxion.ns.ca
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: Re: MX install heterogenous cluster/shared mail database
Date: 26 Aug 92 13:49:57 GMT
Organization: Dymaxion Research Limited, NS, Canada

In article <1992Aug26.094330.41@dymaxion.ns.ca>, I wrote:
> I'm not quite sure how to set up MX on our clustered site of two nodes.

I forgot to add one point:
- do I run the router on both nodes (DYMA and DYME)?
  - if I do this, do I then set up different PATH definitions by running
    MCP on both nodes?
    - i.e. on DYMA (the node with TCP/IP) all outgoing paths use SMTP
           while on DYME all outgoing paths use SMTP-over-DECnet?

Ben.
---
Ben Armstrong, Software Development                  bus: (902)422-1973
Dymaxion Research Ltd.,                              fax: (902)421-1267
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 1R2            Internet: bg@dymaxion.ns.ca
From: Mighty Firebreather <dragon@nscvax.princeton.edu>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: RE: Problem sending mail with two periods in username
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 10:32:07 EDT
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

        Earle Ake <ake@dayton.saic.com> writes:
>
>        I had a little problem sending a message to the username
>larry.e..files@f117.n207.z1.fidonet.org.  It seems MX doesn't like the two
>periods in a row in the username part of the address.  This is MX 3.1C, VMS
>5.4-2, using MultiNet 3.1B.
>
>

<Omitted.>

        I had this problem with an early version of CMU-TEK. This version
took "Richard B. Gilbert" from the owner field of the UAF and converted it
to "Richard.B..Gilbert" causing various peoples mailers to barf.  The
solution, in my case, was to remove the periods from the owner field of the
UAF.  I was told at the time that two consecutive periods in the address
violated the requirements of one of the RFCs; I don't remember which one.

        I'd say that MX is probably right and larry.e..files is wrong.


*************************************************************************
*                                                                       *
*                        Here, there be dragons!                        *
*                      dragon@nscvax.princeton.edu                      *
*                                                                       *
*                                                Richard B. Gilbert     *
*************************************************************************
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
From: bg@dymaxion.ns.ca
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: Solved MX install heterogenous cluster
Date: 26 Aug 92 19:27:54 GMT
Organization: Dymaxion Research Limited, NS, Canada

In article <0095FAB2.755F72C0.20881@engclu.doh.square-d.com>, QUAYLE@engclu.doh.square-d.com (Stan Quayle) writes:
> If your systems share the same mail database, you only need one delivery agent.
> If your systems *don't* share the same mail database, you can still get away
> with only one agent, with proper use of rewrite rules (but it's lot more
> complicated).
> 
> Why are you running SMTP-over-DECnet?  You don't need that for delivery between
> the 2 VAXen.
> 
> Your configuration should look like:
> 
> DYMA    Base MX software, NETLIB, SMTP (UCX 1.3), Documentation
>         Network node name = dymaxion.ns.ca
>         All MX processes run on DYMA
> 
> DYME    Runs the MX startup script (which doesn't start any processes)
> 
Thanks.  This is, in fact, exactly what Matt Madison suggested.  As soon
as I figure out whether I can make do with the few global sections we have
left or whether I need to wait till the weekend to do an AUTOGEN to get
some more, I'll be able to see if the whole thing works.

Ben.
---
Ben Armstrong, Software Development                  bus: (902)422-1973
Dymaxion Research Ltd.,                              fax: (902)421-1267
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 1R2            Internet: bg@dymaxion.ns.ca
From: naresh@LOCALHOST
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: minor problems -from 2.0 to3.1
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 15:36:15 EDT
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

Hi,

        I just upgraded from v2.0 to v3.1c of MX.  Everything seems to
be working ok except two minor problems.  I am sure they are addressed to
in the documentation but I have to print out and read.  Meanwhile, if
any one knows the quick fix, I shall appreciate receiving it.
(1) My return address shows up as username@LOCALHOST and so the person
receiving mail can not reply to it easily.
(2) in v2.0, I had a sig file which I used to append to the message using
   "/sig" at the end of the message.  It does not seem to work.

I shall try to reproduce both problems in this message. Please let me know the
answers. Thanks.


/sig
From: ake@dayton.saic.com (Earle Ake)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: Problem sending mail with two periods in username
Date: 25 Aug 92 22:15:37 EDT
Organization: Science Applications Intl. Corp., Dayton, Ohio

	I had a little problem sending a message to the username
larry.e..files@f117.n207.z1.fidonet.org.  It seems MX doesn't like the two
periods in a row in the username part of the address.  This is MX 3.1C, VMS
5.4-2, using MultiNet 3.1B.


From:	MX%"Postmaster@Dayton.SAIC.COM" 25-AUG-1992 22:00:52.54
To:	AKE
CC:	
Subj:	Message routing error

Note: this message was generated automatically.

Problem occurred during message routing for the following:

Address:  (originally: <larry.e.@>)
Error: Invalid address.

Message follows.

Received: by Dayton.SAIC.COM (MX V3.1C) id 8295; Tue, 25 Aug 1992 21:56:50 EDT
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 21:56:48 EDT
From: Earle Ake <ake@Dayton.SAIC.COM>
X-MX-Warning:   Warning -- Invalid "To" header.
To: larry.e..files@f117.n207.z1.fidonet.org


	Here is the router debug.


25-AUG-1992 22:09:21.28 %PROCESS, Processing entry number 8301
25-AUG-1992 22:09:21.48 %PROCESS, Status from READ_INFO was 00000001
25-AUG-1992 22:09:21.48 %PROCESS, Message originated in VMS Mail.
25-AUG-1992 22:09:21.55 %PROCESS,  will run domain expander on envelope addresses.
25-AUG-1992 22:09:21.55 %PROCESS,  will run domain expander on message headers.
25-AUG-1992 22:09:22.67 %PROCESS, Finished VMSmail-origin preprocessing.
25-AUG-1992 22:09:22.67 %PROCESS, Recipient #0: <larry.e.@>
25-AUG-1992 22:09:22.67 %PROCESS, Invalid address: <larry.e.@>
25-AUG-1992 22:09:22.67 %PROCESS, Beginning ERRORQ processing.
25-AUG-1992 22:09:24.25 %PROCESS, RETURN_MESSAGE status was 00000001
25-AUG-1992 22:09:24.26 %PROCESS, Marking this entry as finished.



-Earle
From: bg@dymaxion.ns.ca
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: MX install heterogenous cluster/shared mail database
Date: 26 Aug 92 13:43:29 GMT
Organization: Dymaxion Research Limited, NS, Canada

I'm not quite sure how to set up MX on our clustered site of two nodes.  It's a
heterogenous site with SYS$SYSDEVICE: pointing to two separate disks but it
uses a shared mail database.  I only have TCP/IP on the first node.

I find the installation documentation rather skimpy.  For one thing, the only
clustered installation example in the v3.0 manual is for a homogenous site. 
Furthermore, the manual talks about what choices you have at each question, but
does not explain how to make those choices.  In particular, I'm not quite sure
which delivery agents need to run on which nodes.  Here are my best guesses:

- install MX only on the first node (DYMA)
- Select: Base MX software, NETLIB, SMTP, SMTP-over-DECnet, and Documentation
- MX Cluster Name = DYMA
- MX network node name = dymaxion.ns.ca
- TCP/IP = UCX V1.3
- all MX directories go on DYM$DISK:[MX...] for DYMA
  - DYM$DISK: points to the same disk on each system, unlike SYS$SYSDEVICE:
- local delivery agent runs on both DYMA and DYME (the other node)
  - is this correct, even though the two nodes share the same mail database?
- SMTP delivery agent runs on DYMA only
- SMTP-over-DECnet delivery agent runs on both DYMA and DYME
- Create SMTP-over-DECnet server object
- Modify all PATH definitions to use SMTP-over-DECnet instead of SMTP
  except the path for dymaxion.ns.ca remains Local

Is this correct?
---
Ben Armstrong, Software Development                 bus: (902)422-1973
Dymaxion Research Ltd.,                             fax: (902)421-1267
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 1R2           Internet: bg@dymaxion.ns.ca
From: ONASCH@IRAV17.ira.uka.de (Bernd Onasch)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: Re: MX 3.1c and UCX 2.0 - Do they work?
Date: 28 Aug 92 13:21:02 GMT
Organization: University of Karlsruhe (FRG)
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

In <1992Aug27.141711.9810@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> GAYNOR@agvax2.ag.ohio-state.edu writes:

[...]
# So, does anyone have any first-hand experience on MX 3.1c and UCX 2.0?
# 
# Thanks!

I have UCX 2.0 (the distribution version now - not any more the field test)
here, and it works without any problems with MX 3.1c.

I had just to disable the UCX SMTP service and it worked... no problems at
all.
I had much more problems migrating from UCX 2.0 FT to the final version :-(

Greetings, Bernd Onasch

,-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
|Bernd Onasch                       _,---._  One half of mine is human [Spock]|
|Informatik Rechnerabteilung [IRA] /       \__,--.I'll never understand humans|
|University of Karlsruhe     __,--/         \     \ No, I'm from Iowa - I only|
|Germany (FRG)              /    |  Uranus   |    / work in outer space [Kirk]|
|   ONASCH@ira.uka.de       \     \     ____/----'  Hello computer ?!? [Scott]|
|   PSI%45050365300::ONASCH  `_____\---'   / There shall be no peace...as long|
|   CCC_ONAS@DULRUU51.BITNET        `-___-' as Kirk lives [Klingon Ambassador]|
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------------'
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
From: meadows@cslvax.weeg.uiowa.edu
Subject: FILESERV Transaction Logs
Reply-To: meadows@cslvax.weeg.uiowa.edu
Organization: U. of Iowa - Weeg Computing Center
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 15:14:34 GMT

    Now that we've got our Mailing List & File Server going well, and
everyone likes it, there has been one question I have not been able to
find in the docs (maybe this is not possible). 

    Is there any way to disable the sending of the FILESERV transaction
log to users who request files? Ideally, we'd like to turn it off on
an individual subscriber basis, but even globally would be ok. Is this
possible? - If so, what do I need to do?

                 Thanks,
                         Howard

***************************************************************************
* Howard Meadows       Sr. Systems Programmer     Weeg Computing Center   *
* University Of Iowa   Iowa City, Iowa  52242     Phone: 319-335-5519     *
*                  email: howard-meadows@uiowa.edu                        *
***************************************************************************
From: Stan Quayle <QUAYLE@engclu.doh.square-d.com>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: RE: MX install heterogenous cluster/shared mail database
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 10:26:30 EDT
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

If your systems share the same mail database, you only need one delivery agent.
If your systems *don't* share the same mail database, you can still get away
with only one agent, with proper use of rewrite rules (but it's lot more
complicated).

Why are you running SMTP-over-DECnet?  You don't need that for delivery between
the 2 VAXen.

Your configuration should look like:

DYMA    Base MX software, NETLIB, SMTP (UCX 1.3), Documentation
        Network node name = dymaxion.ns.ca
        All MX processes run on DYMA

DYME    Runs the MX startup script (which doesn't start any processes)

If you want users on the 2 systems to have distinct addresses (dyma.dymaxion..
and dyme.dymaxion...) then you'll have some work to do with logical names and
rewrite rules.  But I wouldn't recommend it (that's what we're doing here--our
systems do not share the mail database).

-----------------
Stan Quayle  N8SQ  +1 614 764-4212
Internet:  quayle@engclu.doh.square-d.com  UUCP:  osu-cis!squared!quayle
Square-D Company, 5160 Blazer Parkway, Dublin, OH  43017
From: "JAMES R. GRIFFIN(GRIFFIN@ADELPHI-HDLSIG1.ARMY.MIL)"
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: RE: UCX SMTP vs MX
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1992 07:18:54 EDT
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List

UCX or as it's now also called, does support SMTP. Am installing it
tonight and will let you know tomorrow whether any problems arise. Will
also see if MX can be used with UCX 2.0 as well.