HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dks@athena.mit.edu (dks)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: For sunday papers:  By HELEN THOMAS
Keywords: usa federal, government, politics
Date: 16 Aug 92 12:53:30 GMT
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

In article <l8sbodINNl0c@girtab.usc.edu>,
rone@girtab.usc.edu (Ron Echeverri) writes:
>keeping you updated at - whoo! 3:30am.  I deserve a tip from youse guys.

OK, Ron.  Buy low, sell high.


Dhanesh

Hey -- it works for me!
From: jc@optimla.aimla.com (John VanHoozer)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Takes a ticking and keeps on licking
Date: 13 Aug 92 14:27:04 GMT
Reply-To: jc@optimla.aimla.com (John VanHoozer)
Organization: OptImage Interactive Services Co., L.P.

In article <1144@xlnt.COM>, larry@elvisxlnt.com (Larry Pollack) writes:
|> In article <1992Aug11.230758.5828@natinst.com>, lmg@natinst.com 
|> (Louis Gomes) writes:
|> |> In article <1992Aug11.204105.143821@cs.cmu.edu> alexo+@cs.cmu.edu 
|> |>(Alex Orenshteyn) writes:
|> |> >In article <1992Aug11.091540@IASTATE.EDU> danwell@IASTATE.EDU 
|> |> >(Daniel A Ashlock) writes:
|> |> >>familly is a very good choice of a basic unit for conserving capital and
|> |> >It is "family" not "familly", seems like Dan Q. desease has struck
|> |> >another victim.
|> |> 
|> |> It is "disease" not "desease", seems like this is becoming rather
|> |> circular, wouldn't you say?
|> |> --
|> |> louis
|> 
|> I kind of like desease better. It's more in line the Our Boy's style.
|> Or maybe it should be deseese ;) ?
|> -- 

Maybe a bit alt.tasteless for some but:

Or,  given DQ's ignorance on abortion maybe that should be a "D&C's" or
"Dee&Cee's".


				jc
-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
John C. VanHoozer			     |
OptImage Interactive Services Company, L.P.  |  uunet!{optimage,aimla}!jc
11040 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite #300	     |  Fax:  (310)445-5720
Los Angeles, Ca. 90025			     |  Phone:(310) 445-5721
___________________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer:
   Opinions,  yew doone neeed my steenkeeng Opinions.

Carpe Diem:  A carp a day, that's all we ask.
From: rone@girtab.usc.edu (Ron Echeverri)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: For sunday papers:  By HELEN THOMAS
Date: 16 Aug 1992 03:33:49 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: girtab.usc.edu
Keywords: usa federal, government, politics


From UPI wire...

	``When I see the polls, I can't wait to debate Al Gore,'' said
Dan.  And he vowed not to rely on the ``so-called handlers'' who ran
his 1988 campaign.  ``We're not going to repeat that mistake,'' he said.

	As for frequently being the butt of jokes for the past three years,
Quayle said, ``Some of it is cute, but some of it is hateful.

"	Quayle was the butt of many jokes for not being able to spell 
``potato'' and tries to take it in stride. Sometimes people make it
easier for him, like the mother who wrote:
	``You're the hero of my 10-year-old. she can't spell either.''"


5150
keeping you updated at - whoo! 3:30am.  I deserve a tip from youse guys.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: gyan@unixg.ubc.ca (Gyan P. Sinha)
Subject: Re: For sunday papers: By HELEN THOMAS
Keywords: usa federal, government, politics
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 21:52:02 GMT

In <1992Aug16.125330.14617@athena.mit.edu> dks@athena.mit.edu (dks) writes:

>In article <l8sbodINNl0c@girtab.usc.edu>,
>rone@girtab.usc.edu (Ron Echeverri) writes:
>>keeping you updated at - whoo! 3:30am.  I deserve a tip from youse guys.

>OK, Ron.  Buy low, sell high.


>Dhanesh

>Hey -- it works for me!


Make it up in volume.


Gyan P. Sinha
Vancouver.
From: evan@hpscit.sc.hp.com (Evan Whitney)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Danny's gray sideburns: fake?
Date: 18 Aug 92 23:36:10 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Santa Clara, CA

Danny's gray sideburns look fake to me. Has anyone else noticed this?
Is this an attempt to appear more mature and distiguished by dying
his hair gray?
From: elendil@mintir.new-orleans.la.us (Edward J. Branley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Dano's speech/Comedy Channel
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 92 23:33:29 CDT
Organization: Minas Tirith BBS, New Orleans, LA

I really wasn't in the mood to hear Our Boy tonight, so I decided to check out
the convention coverage from the Comedy Channel.  Talk about funny as hell!
What I enjoyed most was actually hearing commentators laughing at Dano while he
was talking.  Good to hear others besides myself not taking him seriously...



|Edward J. Branley                         elendil@mintir.New-Orleans.LA.US|
|Seashell Software                                UUCP:  rex!mintir!elendil|
|3508 North Woodlawn Avenue                          Compu$erve: 71237,2227|
|Metairie, LA   70006       voice: +1-504-455-5087     bbs: +1-504-455-8665|
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: glass@adcalc.fnal.gov (Michael Glass)
Subject: Re: Double messages on abortion
Followup-To: Double messages on abortion
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-a4  
Reply-To: glass@adcalc.fnal.gov
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Distribution:  world
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 00:00:00 GMT

     I think that Eileen Simpson <1992Aug18.090715.12956@nntp.uoregon.edu>
has got it exactly right.  The key is, as she says: "most R's think the
Bushes are nice people."  When George and Barbara both let it slip that
maybe they are, personally, not so drastically opposed to abortion, those
R's who were upset by the platform could become comfortable again.  As
Ms. Simpson puts it:

>It is a cynical ploy that says the public will not notice that these people
>are on record as supporting a complete ban on abortion, but will pick up a
>message that confuses them at the emotional level.

     Moderately pro-choice R's are going to continue feeling that George
Bush is "their" president, sharing their feelings, even as he continues
on the warpath to stamp out every last vestige of legal abortions in both
this country and abroad.

     Reagan appeared (to much of the country) to be such a nice guy that
people kept voting for him, despite polls which showed serious disagreement
with his policies.

     How the hell did we get into this kind of mess?  I know of nobody who
thinks that Lyndon Johnson was a nice guy.  Barry Goldwater seems to me to
have been a lot more personable, easier to warm up to, and able to connect
at a human level.  Yet Goldwater was roundly rejected on the basis of his
policies.  Richard Nixon is as unlikable a man as any who has run for the
office, and Hubert Humphrey could work with everybody, yet it was Nixon
(unfortunately) who won.

     If we now need to *identify* with candidates in order to vote for
them, is it any wonder that so few people vote?

     Fear not that the future will bring us President Quayle.  A country
which elected Ronald Reagan twice as its leader could probably elect a
putrid rutabaga, but it would have to be a *likeable* putrid rutabaga.
Dan Quayle took a whole lot more heat as a result of his public "slip" on
abortion than Barbara Bush did.  I really think that we have little to
worry about from Quayle.

-- Michael Glass
   glass@adcalc.fnal.gov
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: jc@optimla.aimla.com (John VanHoozer)
Subject: alt.fan.dan-quayle Revisited! (Was Re: "This will not stand!")
Reply-To: jc@optimla.aimla.com (John VanHoozer)
Organization: OptImage Interactive Services Co., L.P.
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 92 14:48:04 GMT


In article <1992Aug13.044213.11685@kth.se>, d89-jsp@nada.kth.se 
(Arthur Sparrendahl) writes:

|>In article <1992Aug11.143130.28935@mcshub.dcss.mcmaster.ca>, 
|>bunker@physun.physics.mcmaster.ca (Alex Bunker) writes:
|>|> In article <1992Aug10.213729.7336@kth.se> d89-jsp@nada.kth.se 
|>|>(Jan Sparrendahl) writes:

		[lots of stuff concerning why we
		  should/shouldn't bomb strategic 
		  locations in the Bosnia/Hertzegovina
			deleted for sanities sake	]

Ok folks,  please, please, [hands wringing shirt collar and pitiful
look in eyes ;) can we move this somewhere else?  I hate using "Kill
Author".  Just because I don't want to read something by these authors
today doesn't mean they might have something to say another day.

I have followed this thread and know (approx.) where it started but 
it seems to have digressed.  The header says that it's for a.d-q but I
see very little DQ about it.  Now,  maybe we should ask DQ if he can 
spell Yugoslavia - I wouldn't ask him to spell Hertzegovina since I have
seen the evil/liberal/pack-of-wolves press spell it at least 3 ways
(sort of like Kadafi/Qadaffi/Kuadaphi/Co-Daffy problems that have plagued
us for years).

Just my 2 cents - 


						jc

-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
John C. VanHoozer			     |
OptImage Interactive Services Company, L.P.  |  uunet!{optimage,aimla}!jc
11040 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite #300	     |  Fax:  (310)445-5720
Los Angeles, Ca. 90025			     |  Phone:(310) 445-5721
___________________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer:
   Opinions,  yew doone neeed my steenkeeng Opinions.

Carpe Diem:  A carp a day, that's all we ask.
From: dks@athena.mit.edu (dks)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: The Republicans are confusing me again...
Date: 14 Aug 92 13:10:00 GMT
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

In article <92227.133158HEVANS@ESTEC.BITNET>,
Hugh D.R. Evans <HEVANS@ESTEC.BITNET> writes:
>In article <2A8A9589.16893@noiro.acs.uci.edu>,
>jdooley@maemaster.eng.uci.edu (John R. Dooley) says:
>>In article <7+=yptg@rpi.edu> blythes@cs.rpi.edu (Stephen Blythe) writes:
>>>
>>>Republican Logic ?????
>>>
>>>Can you say PARADOX ???
>>>
>>Yep, and I can say OXYMORON too.
>>
>Ok, I'll bite:  Is Bush the Ox or the Moron, and is Quayl the other?


NO, NO, NO!  Isn't it obvious?

Bush is the oxy-ox -- a strange beast that spews self-contradiction.
And Quayl is the para-moron -- a moron-in-training, as it were.


Dhanesh

[It seems churlish to bring this up, but I originated this thread
 in the now-forlorn hope that some charitable Republican-type would
 explain to me the convolutions and contortions one needs master in
 order to understand the increasingly surreal "pro-life" positions
 of James and George and Dannikins and Barbara and Marilyn and ...]
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: h431@quads.uchicago.edu (heather e blair)
Subject: Quayle for Pres in 1994!
Reply-To: h431@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 21:50:29 GMT

Howdy!
I found this little item in today's New York Times (page A7 in the national
edition):

   "No Comment Yet on Strategy for '94"

      The Vice President promised today that there would be "a new Dan
   Quayle in 1992."  But it looked a lot like the old Dan Quayle from here.
      Asked by Bernard Shaw of CNN if a Bush-Quayle victory this year
   would make him the heir apparent in 1996, the Vice President answered:
      "Let us get through this week.  Let us get through the debate or
   debates.  Let us see George Bush re-elected this November.  And then
   we'll talk about 1994."
      Perhaps Jack F. Kemp, James A. Baker 3d, William J. Bennett and
   Patrick J. Buchanan won't be running that year.


-- 

- Heather Blair       h431@midway.uchicago.edu
From: ses@cmns-moon.think.com (Simon Edward Spero)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Mrs. Dannekins
Date: 22 Aug 92 17:49:29
Organization: What's your clearance, citizen?
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: cmns.think.com
In-reply-to: sharriso@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu's message of Sat, 22 Aug 1992 16:43:23 GMT

In article <1992Aug22.164323.14862@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> sharriso@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Steven K Harrison) writes:

   P.S.  I've got it! Let's have Tipper Gore debate Marilyn Quayle on family 
   values and get Ice-T to serve as the Moderator!

No way! We all know Ice-T's biased- haven't you heard his song 'GOP Killer'?

Simon
--
-----
Guest account at TMC 	|	Just Another  WAIS Hacker | DOD# 0612
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: joel@vthvax.tamu.edu
Subject: Re: Marilyn's "Choice"?
Organization: Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Texas A&M University
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 15:45:30 GMT

In article <1992Aug19.220811.17689@athena.mit.edu>, dks@athena.mit.edu (dks) writes:
> 
> I don't know anyone except Bay Buchanan who thinks such a voice should
> have been given a microphone.  No one is willing to stand up and admit
> that Buchanan speaks for *them*, yet he is allowed to get up on national
> television and hurl insinuations so foul that all my Republican friends
> are embarrassed and disgusted.  It's yet another sign of moral bankruptcy
> that the Republican Party is prostituting itself in this way -- I just
> hope *someone* is getting their money's worth in the steamy Texas night.
> 
> 
> Dhanesh
> 
> For a Good Time in '92, Call Baker-Bush/Quayl
> 
> 

The people that *voted* for him think he should be given a microphone
(including myself).  The dems are afraid to let the radical members of
their party speak.  The're afraid they may come across as (oh no, here it
comes) LIBERAL!  It's not just a "L" word.  Everybody knows what it means
and the democrats can't win if they come across as liberal.  Republicans 
are proud to be called conservative and it doesn't seem to hinder them from
winning the white house.

It's funny you should bring up morals.  Where do you get yours?
If your reading this, that is (Dhanesh says he won't read my notes).

Joel
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: The New Dan Quayle
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 16:43:37 GMT

So I heard on some news program that Danny Boy was promising that we'd see
a "New Dan Quayle" this campaign, beginning with his speech on Thursday night.

Damn, and we had grown so fond of the old one.

My guess is that the new DQ will follow the trend of this campaign, which is
"I can be more of a fascist whitebread family values war monger than you",
a theme which is working well for both the dems and the shit-suck...i mean
republicans........
From: dks@athena.mit.edu (dks)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Convention Speeches
Date: 18 Aug 92 23:09:02 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

In article <1992Aug18.161923.181@usho93.hou281.chevron.com>,
hwcco@chevron.com (Bill Corea) writes:
>During the Democratic National Convention, the transcripts of the
>various speeches were posted. Does anyone plan to do the same
>during the Republican National Convention?

I have no access to materials from the Baker-Bush campaign.
If I had, I would post the texts.


>I am looking, specifically for the text of the speech by
>Condoleezza Rice, of Stanford.

If you find it, please post: it's one of the few "solid" exceptions
in the sea of verbal diarrhea pouring out of Houston.


Dhanesh

PS: Buchanan told 19 lies and half-truths in his speech.  Find them.
From: system@korova.uucp (razorback)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Danny on abortion
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 92 16:02:55 CDT
Organization: VHF void tube of the mind (713) 492-2783

CLINDSAY@vma.cc.nd.edu writes:

> I think George and Danno display what most Republicans feel in their bones--
> abortion should be illegal, but if my little girl (or granddaughter) got in
> trouble, well, I wouldn't question that trip to Europe too closely.  This
> just means that abortion will continue to be easy and safe if you're rich
> and dangerous if you're not.  And that neither of these men would actually
> ostracize his kinfolk for "murder".  I know that some Republicans are really
> ardent believers, and that there are even some pro-choice Republicans, but,
> really, this attitude makes me nauseous.
> BTW, I'm pro-choice, but to use Clinton's phrase, I'd love to see abortion
> 
> "legal but rare".

what i cant understand is the fact that dan and georgie are both 
choice-prone but also strongly support capitol punishment..

squid

--
              VHF void tube of the mind (713) 492-2783
        "where you can find the Zeta Greys SAFEWAYING themselves
                into the WONDERBREAD *heart* of America!"
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: bunker@physun.physics.mcmaster.ca (Alex Bunker)
Subject: Re: Convention Speeches
Organization: Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, McMaster University
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 13:10:27 GMT

In article <1992Aug18.230902.27204@athena.mit.edu> dks@athena.mit.edu (dks) writes:
>In article <1992Aug18.161923.181@usho93.hou281.chevron.com>,
>hwcco@chevron.com (Bill Corea) writes:
>>During the Democratic National Convention, the transcripts of the
>>various speeches were posted. Does anyone plan to do the same
>>during the Republican National Convention?
>
>I have no access to materials from the Baker-Bush campaign.
>If I had, I would post the texts.
>
>
>>I am looking, specifically for the text of the speech by
>>Condoleezza Rice, of Stanford.
>
>If you find it, please post: it's one of the few "solid" exceptions
>in the sea of verbal diarrhea pouring out of Houston.
>
>
>Dhanesh
>
>PS: Buchanan told 19 lies and half-truths in his speech.  Find them.

Does ANYONE have a copy of Buchanans speech. I have heard a lot about 
it and want to see it, it should be good for a laugh.

anyone>
??????
ALEX

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.election
From: cortez@milton.u.washington.edu (Tom Warner)
Subject: Re: The Dan-ster, looking forward.
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 11:54:59 GMT

In article <1992Aug20.001930.14061@news.columbia.edu> egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:
>Does this count as an alt.fan.dan-quayle posting?
>
>Found in today's NYT:
>
>No Comment Yet On Strategy for '94
>
>The Vice President promised today that there would be "a new Dan
>Quayle in 1992."  But it looked a lot like the old Dan Quayle from
>here.
>
>Asked by Bernard Shaw of CNN if a Bush-Quayle victory this year would
>make him the heir apparent in 1996, the Vice President answered:
>
>	"Let us get through this week.  Let us get through the debate
>	 or debates.  Let us see George Bush re-elected this November.
>	 And then we'll talk about 1994."
>
>Perhaps Jack F. Kemp, James A. Baker 3rd, William J. Bennett and
>Patrick J. Buchanan won't be running that year.
>
Of course it counts!

Hmmm.... perhaps he's signalling he'll pull a surprise bid for Congress
as seated Vice President.

Could be his best chance to stay in government after 1996. I saw a poll
of Republican delegates that had 40 percent favoring Kemp in '96 to 4
percent favoring Quayle ... maybe Dan saw that one too, and has been
thinking on his feet.

 ... or maybe not.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: dks@athena.mit.edu (dks)
Subject: Re: Marilyn's "Choice"?
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 22:08:11 GMT

In article <1992Aug19.194900.1301@odin.corp.sgi.com>,
lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford) writes:
>Apparently, Mrs. Danny-boy is going to be making a speech tonight before
>the Republican yahoos nominate the two stooges for another 4 yrs.

I wonder if she received an NEA grant for the performance.  It's certainly
going to be more obscene than anything else the tax-payer has funded.


>I guess the Republican Party feels that it's OK for their wimmenfolk to get
>some book-larnin', as long as they shut up about it, and tend the kids and
>chickens, or tend the kids and the bridge games (on the other end of the
>economic spectrum).  

There are more than a few women delegates at the Republican Convention.
I would give almost anything to know what they're thinking.


>I'm going to be listening to this speech very carefully.  (I actually had
>to turn off Buchanan's speech, I got so angry.)

His pseudo-religious ranting was worthy of the most fundamentalist
ayatollah in Teheran.  Except it was worse: the bastard practically
declared war on his *own* country.  Which, I suppose, is only to be
expected from a crook who used to write Richard Nixon's lies for him.

I don't know anyone except Bay Buchanan who thinks such a voice should
have been given a microphone.  No one is willing to stand up and admit
that Buchanan speaks for *them*, yet he is allowed to get up on national
television and hurl insinuations so foul that all my Republican friends
are embarrassed and disgusted.  It's yet another sign of moral bankruptcy
that the Republican Party is prostituting itself in this way -- I just
hope *someone* is getting their money's worth in the steamy Texas night.


Dhanesh

For a Good Time in '92, Call Baker-Bush/Quayl


Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
From: cortez@milton.u.washington.edu (Tom Warner)
Subject: Re: GPA
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 05:30:38 GMT

In article <6gTkPB1w165w@fennec.sccsi.com> popec@fennec.sccsi.com (William C. Barwell) writes:
>David Binford, (Aug 15), wants to know about Danny's GPA.  He has utterly 
>refused in any way shape or form to let anybody, especially the press or 
>anybody even remotly connected with the press have that information.  The 
>laws we have know prevent any of his schools or his college to release 
>this data without his permission.  We amy never know, alas.  I think we 
>can safely say, it is not very high.  Probably he just squeaked by.
>
BZZZZT! Wrong. The information is listed in several public records,
primarily applications for public employment.
See previous post.
>----------------
>William C. Barwell [popec@fennec.sccsi.com]  //  Pope Charles
>Pope Of the Church Of The SubGenius for the Golden Triangle Area
>Laughing at everything in the Universe...including the concept of 
>laughing at everything in the Universe!
>-----------------
OKAY, now I understand.
From: CLINDSAY@vma.cc.nd.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Re: Danny on abortion
Date: 17 Aug 92 21:04:05 GMT
 <1992Aug10.225456.4633@lsil.com>

I think George and Danno display what most Republicans feel in their bones--
abortion should be illegal, but if my little girl (or granddaughter) got in
trouble, well, I wouldn't question that trip to Europe too closely.  This
just means that abortion will continue to be easy and safe if you're rich
and dangerous if you're not.  And that neither of these men would actually
ostracize his kinfolk for "murder".  I know that some Republicans are really
ardent believers, and that there are even some pro-choice Republicans, but,
really, this attitude makes me nauseous.
BTW, I'm pro-choice, but to use Clinton's phrase, I'd love to see abortion

"legal but rare".
Cathy
From: goldsman@CC.GATECH.EDU (Mike Goldsman)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle
Subject: Does anyone have Transcript of today's CNN Interview
Date: 18 Aug 92 20:54:17 GMT

the message says it all.. From Mitch Cohen's posting
it looks like it was pretty funny.

Dan Quayle '94!!


If anyone got it on tape, please type it in and post it or mail
it to me...

-Mike
Newsgroups: alt.fan.dan-quayle