HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jaapv@accucx.cc.ruu.nl (Jaap Verhage)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Formatting a 3.5" HD diskette to 720K - broken?
Date: 16 Nov 92 19:12:14 GMT
Reply-To: jaapv@accucx.cc.ruu.nl
Organization: Academic Computer Centre Utrecht

GNR100@psuvm.psu.edu writes:


>       as long as the question is raised, how do you do it in MSDOS?

>                                   Gordon Rogers
>                                           gnr100@psuvm.psu.edu
DOS 5: FORMAT <drive:> /F:720 /U <Return>

and don't forget the /U (for `unconditional').
-- 
Regards, Jaap.

Jaap Verhage, Academic Computer Centre, Utrecht University, Holland.
jaapv@accucx.cc.ruu.nl   +<-*|*->+  I claim *every*thing and speak for myself
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: s300@brems.ii.uib.no (Thor Hovden)
Subject: Bootany: uninstall = ?
Keywords: Question  Low-level format
Organization: University of Bergen, Norway
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 16:00:58 GMT

I want to remove Bootany from by hard disk's boot sector.
How can I get this done?

Yes, yes, I know.  I should have taken a backup before I installed it,
but - I did not.  So.. is there some hidden trick to get the default
boot sector back and my hard disk up and alive again?

Status now; I cannot access the harddisk from DOS (entering 'C:'),
fdisk recognizes a non-Dos partitition, and I would rather not
issue the 'format' command yet.. in the hope that any net.people
have the knowledge to solve this problem..

Equipment: Phoenix BIOS, Seagate 5.25" 20 MB  + Seagate 3.5" 40 MB

Pre-thanks,
Thor Hovden (s300@brems.ii.uib.no)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: schao@monet.uwaterloo.ca (Stewart Chao)
Subject: Re: HELP: can't get rid of a directory called "LPT1"
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:07:17 GMT

In article <1103@wspcrd.PeachtreeCityGA.ncr.com> jrs@wspcrd.PeachtreeCityGA.ncr.com (Jim Shockey) writes:
>Hi. I had a directory named "RPT1" which I erased the other day.  While I
>attempt to recover it using Norton Utilities I gave it a wrong name -- "LPT1"
>and now I can't do anything about it.  All I want to do is to erase it.
>Please help me. Please, please, please...

Trying using any directory control programs.  (Like NCD, norton change directory
or PC TOOLS).
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: dbarker@spang.Camosun.BC.CA (Deryk Barker)
Subject: Re: Help: Software is here, printer is there
Organization: Camosun College, Victoria B.C, Canada
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:24:53 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.010641.28325@leland.Stanford.EDU> garygm@leland.Stanford.EDU (Gary Brainin) writes:
>
>   I have an interesting problem.  I'd like to print a couple of Word
>for Windows files on my friend's laserprinter.  However, she neither
>has nor has room for both windows and WfW on her computer.  So, rather
>than moving hardware about, I figured I could just print the file,
>redirecting the printer output to a file, then copy the file from the
>disk to her laserprinter.
>
>   However, when I did this, I got some rather peculiar output.  Only
>the first two lines of the file printed, and the rest of the page was
>blank.  (I also had to press the print button, since no EOP was sent,
>but I can live with that.)  She has an IBM Laserprinter E, and I'm
>using the Windows IBM Laserprinter 4019 driver, which the manual
>indicated would be correct.
>
>   So does anybody know why I'm getting this odd output, and, more
>importantly, how I can fix it?

Try using the /b(inary) qualifier to the copy command. Trying to do
the same thing to a HP IIP I got a similar result. Using /b cured it
(and, I think, removed the necessity for a manual press of the
FormFeed button); strangely enough I have *never* have to use /b when
copying executable from disk to disk.

Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept., Camosun College, Victoria B.C.
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Subject: Re: Saving machine state
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:31:11 GMT
Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc.

robert@alkymi.unit.no (Robert Schmidt) writes:

>Also, the video state should be saved correctly.  Consider all those 
>undocumented VGA modes and Super VGA modes...  you have to save all VGA
>registers in addition to the VGA memory. 

Also, consider that a simple image of memory below 1 Meg is a bad idea.
The state of DOS should not be saved entirely, because things like
buffers and FAT entries would need to reflect the current state of the
machine, rather than the way the machine was when the snapshot was
taken.

I'm not sure if this is a big problem or a small problem.

-- 
#ifdef TRUE        | Fuzzy Fox (a.k.a. David DeSimone)       fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0  |
#define  FALSE  1  |  "You have been recruited by the Star League to defend
#endif             |     the Frontier against Xur and the Kodan Armada."
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.ms-windows.setup
From: vetter@ssd.intel.com (Jeff Vetter)
Subject: Future Domain CDROM drivers??
Keywords: scsi,future domain,cdrom,cd,driver
Organization: Intel Supercomputer Systems
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 18:43:27 GMT

I just purchased a Future Domain 885 SCSI controller and a Sony CDU541 CDROM drive.
Does anyone know of a electronic BB, e.g., Internet, Compuserve, a BBS, where I can
download the FDU-CD driver for DOS/Windows? Thanks.

	- Jeff
From: duck@nuustak.csir.co.za (Paul Ducklin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Formatting a 3.5" HD diskette to 720K - broken?
Date: 20 Nov 92 07:21:25 GMT
Organization: CSIR, South AFrica
NNTP-Posting-Host: nuustak.csir.co.za

>To format a 3.5 HD disk as DD (720k) cover up the extra hole (not
>the write protect stuff) and format it as 720K (I forget the
>command line right now).  It should work.

You don't need to cover the hole. The hole's there, as I understand
it, to stop you formatting a 720KB disc to 1.44MB. Of course, some
claim that the hole is used to create two market entries from a single 
type of disc. I gather, though, that the coercivities of 720KB and 
1.44MB *are* different -- but close enough that you *can* format a
720 disc to 1.44, albeit with lower reliability. 

Just tell FORMAT which disc format you want. DR-DOS 6.0 lets you 
specify /F:720 to achieve the desired result.

[No such "hole" was needed to allow the hardware to distinguish 360
 from 1.2 floppies, because the difference in coercivity of these discs
 is such that a 360 disc will bomb out pretty immediately when you try
 to format it to 1.2MB]

-- 
--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--..--
Paul Ducklin                                       duck@nuustak.csir.co.za

  CSIR Computer Virus Research Lab * Box 395 * Pretoria * 0001 S Africa
Lines: 10
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 16:31:15 MST
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: $dougn@sasb.byu.edu (Douglas R. Nebeker - MIS_SAS)
Subject: Re: HELP: can't get rid of a directory called "LPT1"
Organization: Brigham Young University
Distribution: world

In article <1103@wspcrd.PeachtreeCityGA.ncr.com> jrs@wspcrd.PeachtreeCityGA.ncr.com (Jim Shockey) writes:
>Hi. I had a directory named "RPT1" which I erased the other day.  While I
>attempt to recover it using Norton Utilities I gave it a wrong name -- "LPT1"
>and now I can't do anything about it.  All I want to do is to erase it.
>Please help me. Please, please, please...


I'll bet DEL ?PT1 will do the trick.

Good Luck
From: dave@frackit.UUCP (Dave Ratcliffe)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Is dos 6.0 gonna multitask?  Or have no memory barrier????
Summary: Dumb mistrake - humblest apologies to Coherant
Date: 14 Nov 92 19:02:00 GMT
Organization: Data Factory Services, Harrisburg, Pa.


 In article <1772@frackit.UUCP>, dave@frackit.UUCP (Dave Ratcliffe) writes:
 > In article <1992Nov6.020133.29137@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jav2d@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Adams Vanvalkenburgh) writes:
 > > baloo@mik.uky.edu  writes:
 > > > Is dos 6.0 gonna multitask, and do away with the 640k memory barrier?
 > > > If not I won't believe it.  Dos has gotten so far behind the times.  I'm
 > > > completely sick and tire of 'out of memory messages'  I'll have to switch
 > > > to unix if dos 6.0 doesn't shape up.  
 > 
 > I switched to Unix. And I feel muuuuuuch better now. :)
 > 
 > > What about OS/2.  You get DOS, OS/2 and Windows compatability for a 
 > > lot cheaper tha unix. 
 > 
 > Ahem..... Allow me to present you with:
 > 
 
The following should say CONSENSYS. Sorry about that. My brain went on
hiatus fora minute. It was all this talk about MS-DOS that did it :)

 > Coherant (if you can deal with nearly zero after market support unless
 >           you pay through the nose for it)

It won't happen again, HONEST!

 > MWC (Decent from what I've been told and getting better)
 > 
 > Linux (Ask around. It has a loyal following on the net - see newsgroup
 >        comp.os.linux for more.)
 > 
 > > Especially considered that IBM's newer version
 > > of OS/2 should be due out first Quarter '93, fixing bugs that are
 > > inherent in all versions of an OS.
 > 
 > You mean like NT was due out 4th Q/92? Riiiiiight. MS = More Slippage
 > 
 > >  With DOS 6 who knows what you'll get.
 > 
 >  Everyone knows what you get with any version of DOS. Another OS release
 > that will have bugs they don't want to acknowledge but will charge you
 > substantial $$$ to upgrade away from when they finally fix them. 
 > 
 > I really wonder if MS is aware that a substantial number of their
 > customers are aware of how OS's function beyond a fancy GUI? We're not
 > as stoopid [tm] as they think we are. 
 > 
 > Yes, I run DOS here and I also run CP/M-86 on a Seiko 8610 but my REAL
 > computer runs Unix and thanks me for it daily :)
 > 
 
-- 
 ...uunet!wa3wbu!frackit!dave -or-                       |  Dave Ratcliffe  |
 frackit!dave@uunet.UU.NET -or- dave@frackit.uucp -or-   |  Sys. <*> Admin. |
 vogon1!compnect!frackit!dave@psuvax1.psu.edu            | Harrisburg,  Pa. |
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Subject: Re: Is dos 6.0 gonna multitask? Or have no memory barrier????
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:32:35 GMT

In <1772@frackit.UUCP> dave@frackit.UUCP (Dave Ratcliffe) writes:

>In article <1992Nov6.020133.29137@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jav2d@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Adams Vanvalkenburgh) writes:
>> baloo@mik.uky.edu  writes:
>> > Is dos 6.0 gonna multitask, and do away with the 640k memory barrier?
>> > If not I won't believe it.  Dos has gotten so far behind the times.  I'm
>> > completely sick and tire of 'out of memory messages'  I'll have to switch
>> > to unix if dos 6.0 doesn't shape up.  

>I switched to Unix. And I feel muuuuuuch better now. :)

>> What about OS/2.  You get DOS, OS/2 and Windows compatability for a 
>> lot cheaper tha unix. 

>Ahem..... Allow me to present you with:

>Coherant (if you can deal with nearly zero after market support unless
>          you pay through the nose for it)

And will it run DOS and Windows programs (which is important to some
people who have a large current software investment)?

>MWC (Decent from what I've been told and getting better)

And will it run DOS and Windows programs (which is important to some
people who have a large current software investment)?

>Linux (Ask around. It has a loyal following on the net - see newsgroup
>       comp.os.linux for more.)

And will it run DOS and Windows programs (which is important to some
people who have a large current software investment)?

>> Especially considered that IBM's newer version
>> of OS/2 should be due out first Quarter '93, fixing bugs that are
>> inherent in all versions of an OS.

>You mean like NT was due out 4th Q/92? Riiiiiight. MS = More Slippage

Not sure how you got IBM == MS, but they aren't even close.  We just
got a Service Pack for OS/2, and there should be another one out at
the end of the year (it's in Beta now).

>>  With DOS 6 who knows what you'll get.

>Everyone knows what you get with any version of DOS. Another OS release
>that will have bugs they don't want to acknowledge but will charge you
>substantial $$$ to upgrade away from when they finally fix them. 

No, with DOS 6 you will apparently get DOS 5 plus a bunch of stuff
taht you probably already own if you need it, and don't need to pay
for if you don't.  MS appaers to be releasing a lot of 'minor' type
upgrades on things -- cashflow until NT is really ready?

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
From: frisk@complex.is (Fridrik Skulason)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Saving machine state
Date: 19 Nov 92 15:40:36 GMT
Organization: Frisk Software International, Iceland

robert@alkymi.unit.no (Robert Schmidt) writes:

>Also, the video state should be saved correctly.  Consider all those 
>undocumented VGA modes and Super VGA modes...  you have to save all VGA
>registers in addition to the VGA memory. 

Eh, what if the machine has an EGA card, with those nasty write only registers ?

-frisk
Newsgroups: in.pc,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: rollj@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Jeffrey)
Subject: Oak VGA Card for Sale (Cheap)!
Followup-To: poster
Keywords: VGA
Organization: Purdue University
Distribution: in
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 03:02:34 GMT

For Sale:

One OAK VGA Card w/512k RAM $25.00

The card came with my computer so I have no manual, but it is good working
order and about 6 months old. I am looking to upgrade and wish to sell
quickly. I will take the best offer given, so make an offer if interested.
To do so call or send E-Mail to:

   E-Mail: rollj@sage.cc.purdue.edu
 or call : (317)495-1174 ask for Jeffrey.

Thank You!

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: lachlan@dmp.csiro.au (Lachlan Cranswick)
Subject: Re: DRDOS ver 7 When? What?
Keywords: DRDOS
Organization: CSIRO Division of Mineral Products, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 03:23:48 GMT

news@massey.ac.nz (USENET News System) writes:


>Hi there,

>as an avid DRDOS fan I'd love to know approximately when the next version 
>is due out, and what new and improved features it will provide. Following 
>DRDOS 6 will be a hard act to follow though. I've heard rumors of closer 
>novell support (surprize, surprize) but thats about all.

>How about some speculation, or better yet informed comment!

>Dale Ogilvie

Given DR seem to be a nicer bunch of people over MS with user
support and almost everything else (no suprises there) - 
is there any reason they can not take the lead from MS and
get round this damn 640k limitation.  I don't need a GUI
or the ability to do 70 character file names - I just need to
memory to enable TCP-NFS networking etc.  If DR did this then that would
really kick Microsoft in the teeth - given MS  
are only putting out MS DOS 6 to catch up to DRDOS 6.

If something doesn't happen soon -
it looks like I may have to go through the trial of fire to get
OS2 installed on my work PC so I can finally make proper use of
the 20 Meg of RAM I have on this thing!!
-- 
  Lachlan Cranswick  -  CSIRO             _--_|\  lachlan@dmp.CSIRO.AU
  Division of Mineral Products           /      \ tel +61 3 647 0367
  PO Box 124, Port Melbourne 3207        \_.--._/ fax +61 3 646 3223
  AUSTRALIA                                    v
From: rjb12@unix.brighton.ac.uk (Titch)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Saving machine state
Date: 16 Nov 92 15:49:58 GMT
Organization: University of Brighton, UK

Does anyone know of a method to save the state of a PC (ie environment, 
data, programs) - up to the 1MB boundary - so that, later, I can reload
and things behave as if no interruption occurred.

Cheers,

Rich.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rich Browning (rjb12@bton.unix)   * The Intel Plentium: Ethernet controller  
Department of Computer Science    * or fiendish knitting pattern?          
University of Brighton            * What!? It's a PROCESSOR???            
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
From: apa7u@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Alwyn Peter Allan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Shareware for Disk De-fragmentation.
Date: 23 Nov 92 04:58:06 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia
Originator: apa7u@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU


I have heard that a shareware equivalent of Norton Utility's Speed
Disk is out there. Does anyone know what it might me called, or where
to FTP it.

Thanks.
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Peter Allan                                                  (804) 924-6233
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering                    296-3737
University of Virginia               ,,,                    peter@virginia.edu
From: Brian.Milner@brunel.ac.uk (Brian D Milner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: DOS 3.30 backup -> DOS 5.0 Restore?
Date: 18 Nov 92 16:24:27 GMT
Organization: Brunel University, West London, UK


I'm trying to restore a DOS 3.30 backup onto a PC running DOS 5.0.

Anyone know any quick'n'easy fixes?

="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="
=Brian Milner, The Computer Centre, Brunel University, West London, UK   =
=brian.milner@brunel.ac.uk |OH no! Look at all the washing up to be done!=
="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="="
From: warlok@rhps.chi.il.us (Jon L Fincher)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: Wild Backup idea
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 92 13:15:50 CST
Organization: CrissySoft Incorporated

Michel.Davidoff@sonoma.edu (Michel Davidoff) writes:

> We are considering/thinking about this wild idea.
> 
> We have a network of PC's on Ethernet and Localtalk.
> We'd like to "Backup" those machines to our Cyber.
> Sorry but no flame (We have no money).
> We are thinking about FTPing users Hard disks during the night.
> Any ideas/input expiernce would be helpful.
> The average Hard disk size is 30 MB.
> Thank You
> Michel Davidoff
> E-Mail Michel.Davidoff@Sonoma.edu
Assuming you have local net access to the Cyber, that is, through
some network shared drive/directory (like nN:\ is the network
drive), you can use a PC compression package, like PKZip or ARJ,
to compress the files on the local HD to the network HD.

If you can't get to the netowrk this way, you may be able to
compress the local HD, sending output to your ftp line, piping
the output through. (something like arj *.* | ftp).

Other than that, you might rob a computer store and grab some
Bernoulli boxes on the way out.  Leave a note saying that
CompuServe has appropraited some HW.... ;-)

J.L.Fincher, Warlok
From: kraai4712@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: CLS with state of ECHO
Date: 17 Nov 92 10:03:39 -0600
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

OK, DOS gurus give this one a shot.

Why, when ECHO is ON, when I CLS, does my cursor go to the second line of the
screen, but after I type ECHO OFF and then CLS, the cursor does go to the first
line of the screen as advertised?

Note:  Typing ECHO OFF at the command-line is a nifty, dirty trick that one can
use on co-workers to liven up your day.  Give it a try.
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: holbrook@apollo.HP.COM (Alan R. Holbrook)
Subject: 'All Combinations' Algorithm Needed
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 16:23:21 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Chelmsford, MA
Keywords: combinations

Can someone provide me with an algorithm suitable for writing a program
to dump all possible combinations of 'n' elements taken 'm' at a time?
That is, given the string 'abcdefghijklmnop', I'd like to be able to produce
all possible combinations of, say, 'abcde', then of 'abcdf', or of 'cfilnop'
then 'aceghilmp', etc.  I think you get the idea.

I'm sure anyone who has taken any statistics knows the formula for doing
this, but I never took any statistics.

I know, by the way, that I'm talking ._!LOTS!_. of combinations.  I don't
really need to be able to print or file all of them, I just need to know
how to.

Oh, yeah, in case anyone is tempted to wonder, this isn't for a class or any
other kind of assignment.  Actually, I need to be able to demonstrate a point
to my wife...

Thanks,
Alan Holbrook
holbrook@apollo.hp.com
No .sig, I just post on impulse.
From: pab@po.CWRU.Edu (Pete Babic)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Help with memory fragmentation
Date: 20 Nov 1992 14:02:59 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: pab@po.CWRU.Edu (Pete Babic)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


Does anyone know of a utility that will defragment memory on the fly without
rebooting the machine? Please send Email if you know where I can get this.
Thanks.
-- 
Pete Babic  -  pab@po.cwru.edu          ///
LIVE TO PARTY, SKI TO DIE!!!           ///  /\
Member of ACE                    \\\  ///  /--\MIGA  
(American Coaster Enthusiasts)    \\\/// MS-DOS or a Mac? What's that?
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Subject: Re: Using Smartdrv.sys and Ramdrive.sys together
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:34:43 GMT

In <peter.6@aci_1.aci.ns.ca> peter@aci_1.aci.ns.ca (Peter Cormier) writes:

>Is ther a problem with using Smartdrv.sys and Ramdrive.sys together in the 
>config.sys file ?  Thanks in advance.

Nope.  I'm doing it.

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Subject: Re: HELP: can't get rid of a directory called "LPT1"
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:33:52 GMT

In <1103@wspcrd.PeachtreeCityGA.ncr.com> jrs@wspcrd.PeachtreeCityGA.ncr.com (Jim Shockey) writes:

>Hi. I had a directory named "RPT1" which I erased the other day.  While I
>attempt to recover it using Norton Utilities I gave it a wrong name -- "LPT1"
>and now I can't do anything about it.  All I want to do is to erase it.
>Please help me. Please, please, please...

Why not just go back into Norton Utilities and do it, if it won't work
any other way (and it won't -- unless you do something to tell DOS to
not automatically treat a 'file name' of LPT1 as the printer port;
there is a setting to do this, but I don't recall what it is)?

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.