HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gummi@rhi.hi.is (Gudmundur Bjarni Josepsson)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: Problem with PC-NFS 4.0a and printing
Keywords: problem, pc-nfs, printing
Date: 18 Nov 92 12:41:54 GMT


I've run into an annoying problem with PC-NFS 4.0a when I use it with
Windows.

I was using PC-NFS 3.5c with Windows 3.1 and everything ran fine.
Then I decided it was time to upgrade to version 4.0a.  Windows didn't
like that very much.  After I had upgraded (and told the install program
that I was gonna use PC-NFS with Windows), Windows reported that LPT2,
LPT3 and COM1 were not present on my computer.  When I tried to print
on a network printer via LPT2 or LPT3, I got the message:

	LPT3 is not present on your computer.  Choose the Printers
	option in Control Panel or the Printer Setup command in Print
	Manager to assign an installed port to you (sic) printer.

"Okay, let's change to LPT1."  (Some windows moved, buttons clicked).
"Hey, what do you know. A new message":

	The printer on LPT1 is out of paper or is not connected to your
	computer.  Check the printer cable or network connection to make
	sure the printer is connected, or refresh the paper supply. 
	Then resume the print queue.

Plenty of paper in the paper tray and all the cables securely connected. 
No problem with printing when doing it from DOS.  So, I installed PC-NFS
3.5c again.  Now Windows reported LPT1, LPT2, LPT3 and COM1 missing. 
But I could still print.  On all ports.

Then I tried re-installing 4.0a but this time told the install program
that I was not gonna use it with Windows.  But that didn't change
anything.  I still got the two error messages when I tried to print.

My mouse is installed on COM1 and works with both 3.5c and 4.0a. 
Currently, I'm using 3.5c and everything is running smoothly...just a
moment...just a moment...

Does anybody know what's going on?  Am I doing something wrong?  Is 4.0a
bugged?  Should I find the phone number of the local Netware
distributor?

Thanks in advance,
Gudmundur Bjarni Josepsson
Computing Services
University of Iceland
gummi@rhi.hi.is
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: act@softserver.canberra.edu.au (Andrew Turner)
Subject: Re: PC NFS 4.0 and Windows for Workgroups
Organization: University of Canberra
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 21:31:13 GMT

sys0002@dircon.co.uk (Julian Hayward) writes:

>I run Windows 3.1 with PC NFS to a Unix server. I am about to 
>upgrade to Windows for Workgroups. Will I be able to run both
>'networks' concurrently? I run PCNFS through a packet driver 
>to a Western Digital ethernet card.

Yes although I haven't got it working yet.  The topic is discussed in the
WFW Resource Kit in Appendix E. Alterations are required to config.sys,
autoexec.bat(both obvious (:-) and protocol.ini. Its a bit involved but I had
spoken to someone who actually had it working.  One thing that needs to be
watched are the Novell allocation of drive letters vs the PCNFS allocation.
So Novell with PCNFS seems to be  a worry while LAN Manager with PCNFS seems
OK.
 
>BTW: Does anyone else find the enormous RTM overlay thingy a 
>right pain to load before Windows. Due to its size I can't spare 
>the space to load it high. It is'nt critical to Windows it just 
>seems to allow network configuration from within Windows.

RTM is critical to getting NFS working properly from windows!

-- 
Renrut Werdna			Probable-Possible, my black hen,
				She lays eggs in the Relative When.
				She doesn't lay eggs in the Positive Now
act@ss.canberra.edu.au		Because she's unable to postulate how
From: raoul@eplunix.UUCP (Nico Garcia)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: Starting up PC-NFS 4.0
Date: 19 Nov 92 15:07:07 GMT
Organization: Eaton-Peabody Lab, Boston, MA

Hi. We've got the upgrade version of PC-NFS 4.0, and I have several licenses
on order. In order to test the software, I borrowed the old PCNFS.SYS file
from another employee's decommisioned PC here and installed it on an Insight
486DX, 50 MHz machine with a Sony 3c503 Ethernet board.  I also copied the
pcnfsd installations files onto our Sparc II from the floppies, and added
rpc.pcnfsd to our startup procedures.

The problem: if attempting the command "net pcnfsd server-name", either by
itself or inside the network.bat file, the PC turns on a blip in the upper
right corner and hangs. All TCP-IP addresses are correct, 'ping' to and from
all machines involved works fine, and the thinwire Ethernet seems fine.

The only non-default setting I've made is the interrupt on the ethernet
board, which I've set to 5 instead of 3 to avoid conflicting with com port 2.
Has anyone else had this problem? Is this a software bug, or should I wait
for the new license and test with that? Any ideas on what to check?

			Nico Garcia
			CIRL/MEEI
			eddie.mit.edu!eplunix!raoul
-- 
			Nico Garcia
			CIRL/MEEI
			eddie.mit.edu!eplunix!raoul
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
From: gene@aee.aee.com (Gene Kochanowsky)
Subject: NFS client for DOS availible on internet?? (Freeware)
Summary: DOS
Keywords: NFS
Organization: Associated Electronic Engineers
Distribution: comp
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 19:49:34 GMT

Greetings,

	I have just recently installed a 10Base-T network in my home
and have successfully connect my PC to my Sparc2 with Telbin. I would
like to now mount my Sparc2 disks on my PC using NFS, and would like
to keep it as inexpensive as possible, since this is for home use. If
anyone knows of an NFS client that works under windows and the CU
packet drivers, I would greatly appreciate if they would respond.

Gene Kochanowsky
gene@aee.com
-- 
Gene Kochanowsky                           | "And remember ....
Associated Electronic Engineers, Inc.      |       The better you look ... 
(904)893-6741 Voice, (904)893-2758 Fax     |       the more you will see."
gene@aee.com                               |               Miss Lidia
From: aperron@coyote.matrox.com (Alain Perron)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: pcnfslpd too slow
Summary: problem with pcnfslpd...too slow
Keywords: pc-nfs 4.0a, pcnfsd v2.0
Date: 16 Nov 92 16:30:47 GMT
Organization: Matrox Ltd.



I'd like to know if someone out there gets better performances versus the ones
a get when I use pcnfslpd from pc-nfs 4.0a...

For example, to print the winlogo (size: 100Kb), from windows paintbrush, on 
a hp laserjet seriesII printer (connected to a 286-10MHz parallel port), takes
approximately 25 minutes...(very long)

Setup :

The PC is a 286-10MHz configured in dedicated mode. Its network card is a 
Etherlink III 3c509.
The Sun server is a SS2 running SunOS 4.1.2 and pcnfsd v2.0

Here's how it goes..

The transfer between SS2 and the pc print server takes place only 2 minutes
after the print command has been executed from the PC!!! 

It takes more than 20 minutes to transfer the 100Kb file from the SS2 to
the pc... Humm...

My printcap looks like this:

pcprtsrv1-hp|pc-hpb|PC HP LaserJet II:\
	:lp=:\
	:rm=pcprtsrv1:\
	:rp=LPT1:\
	:mx#0:\
	:sd=/var/spool/printers/pcprtsrv1-hp:\
	:lf=/var/spool/printers/pcprtsrv1-hp/log:

If I use a 486-33, I get better performances (6 minutes 30 sec.) but it's
still too long...

Any help or comments would be appreciated,
	Thanks.

Alain.Perron@matrox.com
From: guy@Auspex.COM (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: Re: Different implementations of NFS? Sun RPC NFS vs. U. of Guelph ?
Keywords: NFS
Date: 18 Nov 92 19:09:26 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara

>In addition, you kinda threw "NFS" and "RPC" together, and
>I thought I should mention that a freely licensed implementation
>of RPC source is on-line (cs.rice.edu? others--use archie).
>I believe this was used in Guelph implementation?

Actually, from what I've seen of the 4.3-reno version of Macklem's
implementation, the kernel part doesn't use a Sun implementation of RPC;
it has a hand-rolled version.

User-mode NFS-server services such as the "mount" protocol are
implemented atop the Sun RPC implementation.
From: curt@ekhadafi.austin.ibm.com (Curt Finch 903 2F021 curt@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com 512-838-2806)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: Re: pcnfs and nlm_share
Date: 19 Nov 92 13:45:44 GMT
Organization: IBM AWD, Austin

(Geoff Arnold @ Sun BOS - R.H. coast near the top) writes:

>A sharing reservation is not a lock.

isn't it just the same as a read lock?

i.e. isn't it just intended to be a prohibition from other processes
opening the file and writing to it while the dos machin is reading?


-- 
curt@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com (Curt L. Finch) | AIX NFS/NIS Field Quality 
My views are unrelated to those of IBM     |        Austin, TX
     Lead_or_Leave's objective is to get all Congressmen to sign a pledge 
  that if the Deficit has not halved by their term's end, they'll step down.
From: jepeway@UTKUX1.UTK.EDU (Chris M Jepeway)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Help w/ Similar Suns that won't Sync to Broadcast NTP
Date: 16 Nov 92 01:55:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: utkux1.1992Nov16.015500.2904
Followup-To: poster,comp.protocols.time.ntp
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville Computer Science Department

So, I'm running xntp for NTPv2 on about 15 Sparcstation 1's.
I've got 3 other Suns (a 3/280, a 3/260 and 4/280) sending
out broadcast NTP packets.  Yeah, I know Sun clocks suck, but
SS1's are the best of the lot, right?  Well, anyway, about
1/3 of the SS1's sync up to one or the other of the Sun-3's;
the remaining 2/3 won't sync to anything.  The sync'ed
SS1's get their offsets down to less than one millisecond
from their chosen host, and dispersions on these machines are
near zero.  On the unsync'ed SS1's, dispersions are anywhere
from 64 to 1.5 or so.  What can be causing this?  And any
ideas on how I might fix it so that all SS1's sync up
to one of the broadcasting hosts?

Chris <jepeway@cs.utk.edu>
From: ewilts@galaxy.gov.bc.ca (Ed Wilts)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Re: uVAXII clock
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:54:23 -0800
Reply-To: EWILTS@GALAXY.GOV.BC.CA
Organization: BC Systems Corporation

In article <1992Nov18.140049.199016@rrz.uni-koeln.de>, schittel@geo.Uni-Koeln.DE (Christoph Schittel) writes:
> 
> Under VMS a uVAX keeps time very well. What about
> Ultrix on uVAX? Is it a good idea to use an old
> uVAXII (in constant temperature environment) as stratum
> 1 server?

I would suggest not.  In my experience, Vaxes of all shapes and sizes have
never really kept time very well, especially under VMS (I have no Vax/Ultrix
experience).  If I compare even 2 8650s here, one being synched to a stratum 2
server and one keeping its own time, I see noticeable drift with the Vax
running fast.

I certainly wouldn't suggest that any Vax be used as a stratum 1 server.  In
fact, why should it even be higher than stratum 4?

-- 

Ed Wilts, BC Systems Corp., 4000 Seymour Place, Victoria, B.C., Canada, V8X 4S8
EWilts@Galaxy.Gov.BC.CA     Office:  (604) 389-3430    Fax: (604) 389-3412
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
From: stevo@elroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Steve Groom)
Subject: Re: Where is the FAQ - new reader
Keywords: FAQ
Organization: Image Analysis Systems Group, JPL
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 01:01:21 GMT

In article <1992Nov18.184009.16778@mlb.semi.harris.com> dbrillha@dave.mis.semi.harris.com writes:

>First dumb question - where can I find an FAQ?

That's it.  THE most frequently asked question :-)

The answer: there isn't one.  The closest thing to one would be
the various materials found on louie.udel.edu in pub/ntp and pub/ntp/doc.
Try "clock.txt" for one.  Also, the docs that come with xntp are pretty
good but a bit on the technical side for many NTP beginners.
I know others will have suggestions.
-- 
Steve Groom, stevo@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
From: schittel@geo.Uni-Koeln.DE (Christoph Schittel)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: uVAXII clock
Date: 18 Nov 92 14:00:49 GMT
Reply-To: schittel@geo.Uni-Koeln.DE (Christoph Schittel)
Organization: Institut f. Geophysik, Uni Koeln

Hello!

Under VMS a uVAX keeps time very well. What about
Ultrix on uVAX? Is it a good idea to use an old
uVAXII (in constant temperature environment) as stratum
1 server?


--- Christoph



Christoph Schittel			Internet:
Institut f. Geophysik			schittel@geo.Uni-Koeln.DE
Universitaet Koeln                       
  F. R. G.
From: richman@reepicheep.gcn.uoknor.edu (Mike Richman)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Re: Need server for U of Oklahoma, Norman
Keywords: ntpdate
Date: 18 Nov 92 15:11:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: constell.Bxx3Jz.CG9
Reply-To: richman@reepicheep.gcn.uoknor.edu (Mike Richman)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
Originator: usenet@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu

In article <Bxw4pu.K2o@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>, richman@reepicheep.gcn.uoknor.edu (Mike Richman) writes:
|> Can someone supply me with a server on the University of Oklahoma at
|> Norman to synchronize with?  I used to use orion.ecn.uoknor.edu and that
|> no longer works.  [I've called several people at OU and no one seem to
|> be able to supply a machine name]  All I get now on boot is the
|> following message:
|> 
|> /usr/local/sbin/ntpdate: no suitable server for synchronization found
|> 
|> The clock on my Sparcstation has drifted nearly 5 minutes within a
|> week!  Thanks in advance.

Thanks to all who told me that orion was decomissioned and constellation
was the replacement.  The way my boot file is set up, it uses the ip
number to poll, so DNS won't work.  Is there a newer version which will
use a nameserver?
-- 
Mike Richman                        !CIMMS/The University of Oklahoma
richman@reepicheep.gcn.uoknor.edu   !100 East Boyd, Room 1110
405-325-3460 (office) 325-7614 (fax)!Norman, OK  73019-0628  USA
From: Mills@UDEL.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Re:  Time servers for ntp
Date: 23 Nov 92 02:53:47 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet

Chuck,

See the pub/ntp/doc directory on louie.udel.edu. See the file clock.tx
for list; see *.ps for documentation.

Dave
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
From: martin@datacomm.ucc.okstate.edu (Martin McCormick)
Subject: NTP Servers
Organization: Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:42:17 GMT


How may I find out a list of any ntp servers which can be used to get the
correct date?  I plan to use  ntpdate  to keep our clock within at least
1 second of the correct time.  Any further accuracy is not really necessary
for this system.

Martin McCormick WB5AGZ   Stillwater, OK
O.S.U. Computer Center Data Communications Group
From: arterton@CPS070.LDS.LORAL.COM (Chuck Arterton)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Time servers for ntp
Date: 22 Nov 92 18:49:04 GMT
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet

Please send addresses of recommended time servers.  Also include additional
documentation on ntp time process.
Thanks
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
From: geger@phantom.den.mmc.com (George Eger (303) 971-6974)
Subject: MIB for ntp
Keywords: MIB SNMP 
Organization: Martin Marietta Astronautics Group
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:42:39 GMT

Has anyone created a SNMP MIB for NTP info?  I would like to be able to
collect ntp peer and system information and set peer and other info using
SNMP.  Is there a standard set of what ntp info is visible to a
management system in a MIB format?

GWE

||==========================================================================
||George Eger                  ||   Voice - (303) - 971 - 6974            ||
||Fault Tolerant Avionics      ||   Fax   - (303) - 977 - 1145            ||
||Launch Systems               ||   MS T320                               ||
||Martin Marietta Astro Group  ||   P.O. Box 179, Denver CO 80201         ||
||==========================================================================
||We are at a cusp - between the past when humans were more reliable than ||
||computers and the future when computers are more reliable than humans.  ||
||==========================================================================
||All opinions (however truthful or misinformed) are my own.              ||
||==========================================================================
From: atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil (Randall Atkinson)
Subject: Re: MIB for ntp
Keywords: MIB SNMP
Organization: Naval Research Laboratory, DC
Distribution: inet
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 15:39:24 GMT

In article <1emjakINNmcn@ni.umd.edu> louie@sayshell.umd.edu (Louis A. Mamakos) writes:
>There are, of course, a number of design decisions to make; one of the
>more obvious is how to represent 64 bit NTP timestamps in the MIB.
>Two 32 bit integers?  Octet string?  Hmm..

  That is a good question.  The notion of adding a 64-bit entity as
part of the SNMP v2 (aka SMP) work seems to have been discarded if I
recall my mailing list traffic correctly.

  If such a MIB were read-write, someone would need to look at the
security implications since NTP already has its own security and SNMP
has its own.  It would be undesirable if a compromised SNMP could be
used to undermine an uncompromised NTP or vice versa.

Ran
atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil
From: nicinski@fndaud.fnal.gov (Tom Nicinski)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Setting time on VxWorks board via NTP
Keywords: VxWorks
Date: 19 Nov 92 17:38:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: fnnews.1egjepINNrq5
Distribution: world
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia IL
NNTP-Posting-Host: fndaud.fnal.gov


I'd like to set the time on a VxWorks board when ntpd is started.  I'm using
Bob Herlien's port of NTP to VxWorks.  WAYTOOBIG (in ntp.h) is set to 1000.0
seconds.  NTP simply gives up on trying to correct the clock if the offset
from its peers is over this;  that's the condition at the boot of the board.

I don't want to rely on the system TOD clock to set the time when the board
boots as its resolution is only 1 second (well below our requirements). Well
be connected directly to a stratum 1 server (with a WWVB receiver), so I'd
like to use its time to set the VxWorks board's time.

If I set the time by hand (or other means) with setgmt, it takes NTP quite
a while to say that the 4 second (as an example) offset should be corrected
with one big correction.  This also is unaccepatable, since the VxWorks
board would not be useful until it's time was as close to UTC (or TAI) as
possible (we're working on a DA system for a telescope and need to associate
position and time with a particular CCD line when drift scanning).

Tom Nicinski
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
From: glenn@sundeck.usask.ca (Glenn Hollinger)
Subject: Re: uVAXII clock
Originator: glenn@sundeck.usask.ca
Reply-To: glenn@sundeck.usask.ca
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Distribution: inet
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:46:41 GMT

From article <1eg6e1INNnr4@ni.umd.edu>, by louie@sayshell.umd.edu (Louis A. Mamakos):
> In article <1992Nov18.140049.199016@rrz.uni-koeln.de> schittel@geo.Uni-Koeln.DE (Christoph Schittel) writes:
> 
>>Under VMS a uVAX keeps time very well. What about
>>Ultrix on uVAX? Is it a good idea to use an old
>>uVAXII (in constant temperature environment) as stratum
>>1 server?
> 
> Given that a MicroVAX-II CPU's clock only has a resolution of 20ms,
> this is some new interpretation of "keeps time very well."  

The microVAX ticks along at 100 HZ, wich put the system clock resolution
at 10ms, not 20ms.  In practice, Xntp can keep the time with 5ms of a
satellite receiver.  Not a great time server compared to new stuff like
recent SparcStations, but many people have microVAX IIs/2000s pretending
to be doorstops.  It is a reasonable use for this older equipment.  It
doesn't cost much and doesn't overtax these small systems.

Glenn Hollinger,
University of Saskatchewan.
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
From: keith@controls.ccd.harris.com (Keith Turner)
Subject: rs6000 config help needed
Organization: Harris Controls and Composition
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:58:13 GMT

This is harder than I expected.  Even after reading the
small amount of info available it's still a mystery.

I just got xntpd version 3.1 and am trying to use it on
a local network of rs6000's running AIX 3.2.  I've never
tried any ntp before.  Once I understand how to configure
and run it I hope to use it for all the rs6000's and
Sparc's on this isolated local network.

I turned on REFCLOCK and LOCAL_CLOCK and compiled with no
problems.  Set up config files on Machine A and Machine B.

 MACHINE A                        | Machine B
 server 127.127.1.1 # Machine A   | server 147.90.8.40 # Machine A
 peer 147.90.8.41 # Machine B     | peer 147.90.8.41 # Machine B
 driftfile /etc/ntp.drift         | driftfile /etc/ntp.drift

I execute xntpd on both machines but don't seem to be getting
any valid data from Machine A to Machine B.  I turned on DEBUG
and get lots of output including the message
"invalid packet header 147.90.8.40 26" on Machine B.  
I could really use some help.  Any ideas? 

I'm also having trouble understanding what the content of
the key file is to look like, how to generate it and how
to respond to those prompts for Keyid and Password that
the xntpdc makes. 

Keith Turner  (keith@ccd.harris.com)
From: martin@datacomm.ucc.okstate.edu (Martin McCormick)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Re: NTP Servers
Date: 18 Nov 92 14:43:44 GMT
Article-I.D.: osuunx.1992Nov18.144344.4514
Organization: Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK


I want to thank everybody who answered my question about ntp servers.
Basically, the responses informed me about specific servers on Midnet
and told me about the clock.txt file on louie.udel.edu.  This is another example
of Usenet at its finest.

Martin McCormick WB5AGZ   Stillwater, OK
O.S.U. Computer Center Data Communications Group
From: iglesias@draco.acs.uci.edu (Mike Iglesias)
Subject: Re: MIB for ntp
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Keywords: MIB SNMP
Date: 22 Nov 92 05:17:49 GMT
Distribution: inet

In article <1emjakINNmcn@ni.umd.edu> louie@sayshell.umd.edu (Louis A. Mamakos) writes:
>There are, of course, a number of design decisions to make; one of the
>more obvious is how to represent 64 bit NTP timestamps in the MIB.
>Two 32 bit integers?  Octet string?  Hmm..

If I remember correctly, at the Interop presentation on SMP (aka SNMP v2)
they mentioned having 64 bit values in MIB data.  I don't have my notes
handy so I can't check for sure.


Mike Iglesias                        Internet:    iglesias@draco.acs.uci.edu
University of California, Irvine     BITNET:      iglesias@uci
Office of Academic Computing         uucp:        ...!ucbvax!ucivax!iglesias
Distributed Computing Support        phone:       (714) 856-6926
From: louie@sayshell.umd.edu (Louis A. Mamakos)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Re: MIB for ntp
Date: 22 Nov 1992 00:13:08 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Distribution: inet
NNTP-Posting-Host: sayshell.umd.edu
Keywords: MIB SNMP

In article <1992Nov20.154239.27827@den.mmc.com> geger@phantom.den.mmc.com (George Eger (303) 971-6974) writes:
>Has anyone created a SNMP MIB for NTP info?  I would like to be able to
>collect ntp peer and system information and set peer and other info using
>SNMP.  Is there a standard set of what ntp info is visible to a
>management system in a MIB format?

This is an interesting topic that some of us have kicked around from
time to time.  There currently is no MIB defined for NTP; one would
have to be designed.  

There are, of course, a number of design decisions to make; one of the
more obvious is how to represent 64 bit NTP timestamps in the MIB.
Two 32 bit integers?  Octet string?  Hmm..

louie