HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gary@isis.cgd.ucar.edu (Gary Strand)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: John Elway's Comebacks.
Date: 7 Oct 92 01:51:23 GMT
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO

As promised, here they are, *'s are NFC teams:

   1. 1983: W 21-19 Baltimore, from 0-19 in 4th.
   2. 1984: W 26-19 New England, from 12-19 in 4th.
   3.       W 16-13 San Diego, from 9-13 in 4th.
*  4. 1985: W 44-28 Atlanta, from 27-28 in 4th.
   5.       W 17-16 San Francisco, from 14-16 in 4th.
   6.       W 30-24 San Diego, OT. From 21-24 to FG to tie, & defensive TD.
   7.       W 31-23 Pittsburgh, from 17-23, & defensive TD.
   8.       W 14-13 Kansas City, from 7-13 in 4th.
   9.       W 27-24 Seattle, from 17-24 in 4th.
  10. 1986: W 38-36 LA Raiders, from 31-36 in 4th.
  11.       W 23-20 Cleveland, OT. The Drive in the AFC Championship.
* 12. 1987: T 17-17 Green Bay, from 10-17 in 4th.
* 13.       W 31-29 Chicago, from 24-29 in 4th.
  14.       W 31-20 New England, from 17-20, & defensive TD.
  15.       W 38-33 Cleveland, from 31-31 in 4th. AFC Championship, & safety.
* 16. 1988: W 16-13 San Francisco, OT. From 6-13 in 4th, TD, & FG in OT.
  17. 1989: W 16-10 San Diego, from 9-10 in 4th.
  18.       W 24-21 Seattle, OT. from 14-21 in 4th, & OT FG.
  19.       W 24-23 Pittsburgh, from 17-23 in 4th. AFC playoffs.
  20. 1990: W 24-23 Kansas City, from 21-23 in 4th.
  21.       W 34-31 Seattle, OT. FG to win game, from 31-31 tie.
  22.       W 27-17 Indianapolis, from 17-17 tie in 4th.
  23. 1991: W 19-16 Kansas City, from 16-16 tie in 4th.
  24.       W  9- 6 New England, from 6-6 tie in 4th.
  25.       W 17- 7 Cleveland, from 7-7 tie in 4th.
* 26.       W 24-19 Phoenix, from 17-19 in 4th.
  27.       W 26-24 Houston, from 23-24 in 4th, AFC playoffs.
  28. 1992: W 17-13 LA Raiders, from 10-13 in 4th.
  29.       W 20-19 Kansas City, from 6-19 in 4th.

--
Gary Strand                      Opinions stated herein are mine alone and are
strandwg@ncar.ucar.edu            not representative of NCAR, UCAR, or the NSF
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Bob Marshall)
Subject: Re: Niners Beat Aints, Refs
Reply-To: marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 92 01:18:29 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.191955.15422@cs.tulane.edu>, buckley@cs.tulane.edu (James Buckley) writes:
>Remember, the 49ers have to play the Saints one more time this year.
>So I wouldn't get all "high and mighty" just yet ...
>
>BTW, it was a well played football game for both side (in case someone
>really cares about the game itself! :-)

Five turnovers and only ten points scored is a well-played football game?
What does an average Saints game look like? A Patriots game?

=============================================================================
Bob Marshall                     \\     "It ain't age
Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.     \\     That makes me look this way
Sunnyvale, CA                      \\    It ain't the years, boys,
marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com\\   It's the miles"
"I tell the truth 'cept when I lie"  \\     - Chris LeDoux
=============================================================================
From: s1dlr@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel L Rose)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Cardinal TE's
Keywords: Cardinal TE
Date: 30 Sep 92 15:10:49 GMT
Reply-To: s1dlr@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel L Rose)
Organization: Iowa State University


 
Who are  the  Phoenix Cardinals playing at TE?

THX,   dlr
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: Buffalo??  Philly??  Nope!!!
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 21:06:39 GMT

In article <BvEG1v.FzL@acsu.buffalo.edu> v079l2xj@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (MARK B KRUZYNSKI) writes:
>Davis is the most underrated player on this Bills offense.  When
>Thomas goes out for a rest, how many times do you see Davis picking up right
>where Thurman left off.  
I don't know. The only time I saw Davis was at THE show. Thomas went out
for a helmet-searching mission, I didn't see Davis picking up
right where Thurman left off. As a matter of fact, I thought a helmet-less
Thurman might have done better than that 1-yard carry.

>You can't tell me that 25 other teams wouldn't pick
>him up if they had the chance.  
I sure can. The Redskins wouldn't want him. So make that 24 other teams.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: UC516349@mizzou1.missouri.edu (The Pseudo Edge)
Subject: Mark Clayton
Organization: University of Missouri
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 04:36:48 GMT
X-Posted-From: mizzou1.missouri.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

  Will he be activated for this sunday's game?
I would like to know because I would like to start him
this week.
Thanx,
 
Wayne
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: scmattic@IASTATE.EDU (Felix the Cat)
Subject:  Harbaugh or Aikman, and John Taylor
Reply-To: scmattic@IASTATE.EDU (Felix the Cat)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 17:16:35 GMT


Should I play Harbaugh or Aikman for my Fantasy Football team this week?

Aikman has to play that wicked Eagles defense, but he's a better QB than
Harbaugh (plus better receivers)

Harbaugh  had a career game last week, but is inconsistent ( as is Chicago ).
Will he do well against the Minnesota defense??


I'm sure it's going to come down to a coin-toss. Any insight would be
appreciated.



Also:

Is John Taylor on IR?????????
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Subject: Re: MNF halftime
Organization:  University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Date: 30 SEP 92 14:45:06    

In article <56322@olivea.atc.olivetti.com>, rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith) writes...

>So given the opportunity to make more money at a new job where you fit in,
>and get to move to a warm sunny climate, you yourself would turn down the
>offer and stay with your current employer?

Warm, sunny climate?  Can't be Wisconsin.  Yep, I'd turn it down.

******************************************************************************
 \ ________                      John Heim
  (         \,,   ( MOOOOO )     UW-Madison Academic Computing Center
  |/m---|/ \ oo   /              1210 W. Dayton St.
  | \   | \   -C         \|/     Madison, WI 53706
\|/                \|/           Email:  heim@macc.wisc.edu
Organization: Freshman, CIT general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Tue,  6 Oct 1992 22:02:10 -0400 
From: "Calvin D. Swartzentruber" <cs6t+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: EAGLES, COWBOYS

Some of us Eagles fans have more sense than to base our whole season on
one game.  But just for your benefit:

WOOF! WOOF! WOOF!

Calvin
A loyal Eagle in Pittsburgh

The opinions expressed in this post do not necessarily those of my city,
or my college, or my parents, or the guy who used to lived next door to
me when I was a kid.
From: caeser@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Robert Michael Trotter)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Vikings vs Bears
Date: 6 Oct 1992 18:56:35 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Oct6.182852.735@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>In article <1aq239INNiu9@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, mjb10@po.CWRU.Edu (Michael J. Bumbulis) writes...
>
>[Deletions]
>
>>Gannon then came through with some
>>crisp passing  (I really think with more exp, this
>>lad will be a premier quarterback) and Roger Craig and Chris Carter
>>also stepped up.  
>
>The only problem I have with what you've said so far is about Gannon 
>being a premere QB if he gets more experience.  Gannon already has 6 
>years of NFL experience and lots of playing time.  I don't think more 
>experience is going to make much difference.
>
	Well, most of this time, he was a backup behind Kramer and
	Wilson. Gannon really has only been a "true" starter for about
	one full season. Dont forget, Wilson was the starter at the
	beginning of last year. Gannon really hasnt gotten FULL playing
	time, and I agree with the above poster, with a year or two
	more as the full starter, Gannon will be a good QB.

>>The next test - Detriot.  They should beat Detriot (their
>>only loss has been to Detroit and that was Detroits only
>>win.  A good team has to win the games they are supposed to win.
>> 
>>[Soon they will be tested against some real teams - Philly, Houston,
>>and SF]
>
>The Vikes are a better team than Detroit.  Not as much better as 4-1 
>vs 1-4 might indicate but the Vikings are definately a better team.
>
	Yes, We are a better team than Detroit, and we *should* win
	at home. I only pray that we do come through and continue to 
	be a better team, and commit *less* turnovers. They really are
	killing us, and the Lions will take advantage like before if
	we give them the chance too.

>They are not in the same class as Philly, Houston, or SF.  That 
>doesn't mean they couldn't pull off an upset or 2.
>
	Well, I think we have 4 tough games in the schedule, 

	Oct 25 Washington
	Nov 15 Houston
	Dec  6 at philadelphia
	Dec 13 San Francisco

	3 of these four games are at home, and we could upset one or two.
	Going to Philly will be very tough, but we could upset Houston
	,Washington, and possibly the 49ers. We have done that before. The 
	Vikings usally get up for the 9ers.

>>BTW, I think Dennis Green is on the road to Coach of the Year.  
>>Any comments?
>
>If they had s Coach of the 1st Half of the Year he'd probably have it.
>But they were an 8-8 team last year after all.  You could make almost 
>as good a case for Bill Cowher of the Steelers as for Green.
>There's a lot of season left too.
>JGH

	Yeap, exactly. Vut if Minnesota does go 11-5 or 10-6, that will be
	a most welcome improvement! :)

	Mark
	GO VIKINGS!

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: FINAL SCORES
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 23:58:29 GMT


Miami   37   Buffalo  10  * FINAL   FISH swallow Bullafo CHIPS, then
spit them out! YES!  Biggest Upset of the weekend????  Homey don't
think so. :-)

Chicago  20	 Minnesota  21  * FINAL  Are the Vikings for REAL? YES!
Green Bay	10	       Atlanta   24  * FINAL Who cares?!
New Orleans	 13    Detroit  7    * FINAL Lions self-destructed
LA Rams	24			 San Francisco   27 * FINAL At least THEY WON!
NY Giants	10		LA Raiders 13  * FINAL  Raiders finally win!
Washington  24     Phoenix   26  * FINAL  Oops, upset here!
Kansas City	19		Denver      20 * FINAL Elway the comeback KID?! 
Seattle		6	   San Diego  17  * FINAL who cares      
Indianapolis  24	 Tampa Bay  14  * FINAL  HUH!? Who cares?!

Biggest winnies this Sunday, DA BILLS!
                               
NINER/RAM GAME:
4th qtr:

The Rams got an INT and ran it for a TD.

Niners: 10
Rams:  17

The Niners then punted. Rams then had a TO and
Young ran for a 8 yd. TD.

Niners: 17
Rams:  17


The Niners have the ball again and they are moving
the ball at this point. YOUNG just ran for a 39 yard
TD.  Young scrambles, fakes a pass, freezes the D. He
then runs toward the sideline, cuts to the middle of
the field. Will HE...GO ALLLL THE WAYY...YESSS!
Young stumbles into the endzone. YESS! 
Brought back memoris of the Famous Young run against
the Vikings (1988).

Niners: 24
Rams:  17

Damn, the Rams just tied it up:

Niners: 24
Rams:   24

Everett threw a zinger in the endzone, between two defenders, to
Anderson, TD. Damn ...less than 2 minuts left.

Yes, Young 42 yarder to Brent Jones..ball on their 32.
(48 yd. attempt for Cofer at this point)
1:08 left in game...they need to get a couple of 1st dwns
to make it easier for Cofer. 2 & 10

Yes, Young to Rice, 26 yd, 1st down, 5 yard line...
ALL PRO CATCH!!!!, one hand catch....YES! 1st goal and five.

Two successive runs by Watters, just one yard gain.
3rd down with :05 seconds left.  They are bringing
Cofer in to win game. nervous, my hands are sweating and
I am just a FAN....imagine what Cofer is going through.
He makes it, the Niners win, if he misses, it is OT.

He MAKES IT, one second on clock!

Well, the Niners did not win by the spread, but at
LEAST THEY WON.  

Niners: 27
Rams:   24

-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "Fact are facts and will not disappear on account of 
   your likes."  -   Jawaharlal Nehru
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Ahn@pop.cis.yale.edu (Eugene R. Ahn)
Subject: Re: To all Dolphin fans
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Yale University
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 05:57:30 GMT

In article <Bvnwrw.D3r@encore.com>, tolsen@encore.com (Ted Olsen) wrote:
> 
> 
> Let me start by saying that I was in the Orange Bowl the night
> Joe Auer ran the Dolphins very first kickoff return 
> back for a touchdown.  I was then and have always been a
> Dolphin fan. Okay... I'm an old shit :-)  Anyway.. on to my point.

We're not worthy! We're not worthy!

> Over the last year or so I have quietly watched
> the posts that take place here in r.s.f.p.  I have
> always been amused by the way people get so excited when
> their team wins a big game and have been equally amazed by how fast
> people kick their team when they loose a big game.  I have always attributed
> it to those (insert derogatory remark here) fans of those other teams.

OK. Sort of a fallacy to begin with, but go on.

> So....  We have a big game this weekend.  We win..  And guess what?
> Dolphin fans have really let me down. They are doing the same thing!
> My god people they won one game!  Yes, it was one of the biggest wins
> in the last couple of years. Yes, Keith Jackson has made a good offense
> better. Yes, the defense is improving. Yes, I'm excited as you, however,
> they still have 12 to play.  How the hell can you even be talking about
> going 16 and 0? They still have to play Atlanta, Buffalo, New Orleans,
> San Francisco, Houston, Indy twice, and New York twice.  Maybe you all
> were just kidding about 16 and 0?  Right???  I hope so! Lets calm down, 
> see what happens over the next 12 weeks and hope for a Buffalo/Miami AFC    
> championship game here in Miami this January!

Well, to assume that the people who post here are a large representative
portion of dolfans is pretty silly. Part of it's for show and taunt anyway,
at least it is with me.16-0 YEAHHH! What's the use in restraining joy!? The
great thing about joy is that you live for the moment and not for the
future.

Well, anyway, keep your faith pops! The skies not falling!

> Hey.  I want them to win as badly as you but the posts this morning
> were a bit much.

Thanks pops. We won't do it again. By the way, could I have 7 bucks for the
movies?

--
Mos Eisley  
"Children's television is like dog food. They don't care what it tastes
like as long as the kids eat it." Bob Camp, producer, now director of R&S,
on TV networks
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dubear@molbio.cbs.umn.edu (Dubear Kroening)
Subject: Status of Mark Clayton and Louis Lipps?
Organization: University of Minnesota
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 15:45:56 GMT

I would like to know the current status of Mark Clayton and Louis Lipps.
Is Clayton ready to play on sunday?
I heard that Lipps ran back punts and kickoffs on Sun night.
Is this true?
Will he start receiving this weekend?

You can just e-mail me if you have any information  dubear@molbio.cbs.umn.edu


Thanks in advance

Dubear
Organization: Central Michigan University
Date: Monday, 28 Sep 1992 20:41:07 EDT
From: <3ZASIB3@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: da Bills and some other games(LIONS)
Distribution: usa

Am I missing something?  As I recall, the Lions lost to Washington, Chicago
and Tampa Bay.  The *1* in their 1-3 record was a victory over those high
and mighty Vikings that you love so well, Mark.  Bob
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullivan)
Subject: Re: Niners Beat Aints, Refs
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 09:42:01 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.011829.16810@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com>,
marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Bob Marshall) writes:
>In article <1992Sep28.191955.15422@cs.tulane.edu>, buckley@cs.tulane.edu (James Buckley) writes:
>>Remember, the 49ers have to play the Saints one more time this year.
>>So I wouldn't get all "high and mighty" just yet ...
>>
>>BTW, it was a well played football game for both side (in case someone
>>really cares about the game itself! :-)
>
>Five turnovers and only ten points scored is a well-played football game?
>What does an average Saints game look like? A Patriots game?

I'm a Niners fan and I think the Saints played a great game.  Hebert
sucks, but 3 of the turnovers were good and lucky defensive plays by
the Niners, two fumbles and one INT.  Chalk up the other 2 INTs to
bad Hebert decisions as usual.

I've never been disappointed in any Saints/Niners game I've seen in
the last few years since Mora is in charge including the ones we've
been beat.  There is no general buffoonery in these games like many
of the rest of the games in the NFL.

Mike
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: azjohn@eagle.larc.nasa.gov (John Paul Phillips)
Subject: Re: Cowboys can kick Bills Butt
Reply-To: azjohn@eagle.larc.nasa.gov (John Paul Phillips)
Organization: NASA
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 19:05:36 GMT

In article <2542@devnull.mpd.tandem.com>, dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch) 
writes:
>>BZZZZZTT! Wrongo, Dan! Previous results have absolutely no effect on the 
odds 
>>of flipping a coin. Even if you got ten heads in a row, the odds of getting 
>>another head is still 50%. 
> 
> I KNOW.  It was a JOKE.  I was POKING FUN.  Maybe if I use ALL CAPITALS
> this will be EASIER to READ.  I'm sorry for the CONFUSION -- I'll try not
> to be SUBTLE about things ANYMORE.
>
 I must have been more tired than I realized. In hindsight, I can see the 
sarcasm. You don't have to apologize, I do. 
> 
> If sarcasm was posted to the net, and nobody noticed, would it still be
> sarcasm?

Ummm...  you mean like if a tree falls in a forest and no one's there to hear 
it...  naaahhh. You intended the sarcasm, and you see it even if no one else 
see it, it's still sarcasm. However, if no one else sees it, that may imply 
something about you...;)
 
> >Cowboys Forever!
> 
> Ah, well, everyone has a redeeming quality! :^)

Thanks.

------------------------
       John Paul Phillips   
             "Azjohn"         
         NASA/Langley        
azjohn@eagle.larc.nasa.gov
From: tap1040@zeus.tamu.edu (SPEED RACER)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Predictions, anyone?
Date: 2 Oct 92 15:56:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: zeus.2OCT199210564844
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <27000111@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>, boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell) writes...
>Eagles vs Bills
> 

I didn't know the Eagles were playing the *Bills* this week.  :^)

________________________________________________________________________________

                                     Tracy      
                              Texas A&M University
				       
John Madden: "There's a good sign.  Troy Aikman putting his pants back on."
Pat Summerall: "That's ALWAYS a good sign."    (RFK Stadium, Nov. 24, 1991)
________________________________________________________________________________
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Injured Reserve
Date: 26 Sep 1992 15:38:29 GMT
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

Hi there
I have the following opinion for IR lists.
There have been strong rumors in SI that the IR list is
being misused. Now, I dont want to start a thread 
about who cheated etc. but I think the following
idea might be useful/simple.

Instead of the current list of 47 players and IR
give each team a roster option for 50 players
and no IR. If a person is injured he will not be playing
but will still be on this list. And a Team 
should be allowed a specified no.of changes during
a season in this roster say 6 changes in a regular 
season after the list of 50 players on the opening day.

May be there will be ideas for increasing the list to 52
but travel costs will be involved and Player Unions may
oppose this but these are just some of my ideas.
And they may be found to be stupid after some
analysis.

Comments Welcome.

************************************************************
N.Ramasubramanian          	GO BREWERS ! GO !    

Dept. of Mech. Engg.	        Listach for ROY
Marquette University       
************************************************************
From: rtcst3+@pitt.edu (Robert   T Conticello)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cowboys can kick Bills Butt
Date: 26 Sep 92 17:11:53 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Sep25.175718.21432@coopsol.com> gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
><BuyK68.DtA@news.cso.uiuc.edu> glb50263@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Gary L. Blickhan) :
>>Thurman Thomas works magic, just ask 49ers fans.  Emmitt Smith is great,
>>but he's not the complete package.
>
>They are both featured in slightly different offensive schemes.  Dallas
>has the best receiver in the league in Irvin.  That results in Smith
>getting fewer passes.  And Dallas has a better defense than the 9ers do.

Hey, Irvin is good, no doubt about it - one of the best. A few others are
just as good.  On any given Sunday one of them might outperform the other,
depending on the competition. (See below)

Feel free to remove foot from mouth. :)

>>(Thurman Thomas and Jim Brown are the only players to lead in total yards
>>for three straight years!)
>
>Hey, Thomas is good, no doubt about it - one of the best.  Smith is just
>as good.  On any given Sunday one of them might outperform the other,
>depending on the competition.

This type of shit is real boring.

Rob Conticello.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Will SF win the division?
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 03:12:08 GMT

In article <1ateggINNser@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright) writes:
>
>Will SF win the divison?
>
> [ nonsense deleted ]
>
>Considering SF nearly lost to the Ram's, arguably one of the
>weakest teams in the NFC, and her secondary collapsed under the Saints
>(not the strongest of offenses), I would say that SF will loose to the
>Saints again, loose to the fired up Marino, and probably loose one of
>two to Atlanta. SF ends the season 11-5.
>
> [ nonsense deleted ]
>
>If Miami looses to the Saints, they will probably loose to SF, which
>proves their latest win may have been a fluke. They end up 10-6, which
>puts them just behind SF. And I think SF beats them in a tie, in case
>NO beats out Atlanta or Maimi.
>
>If SF beat out the Saints, they can probably beat out Atlanta, since
>they don't seem to be doing that well this year.
>
>
>  All comments  are mine---(David Wright) 
>
Did you by any chance drink some "Babble Scotch" or what? You have
no rhyme or reason to whatever you were attempting to convey.
Who in the hell are you, "The IF Man"?

"He knows so little and knows it so fluenlty" - Ellen Glasgow


-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  Let us be thankful for the fools; but for them the rest
  of us could not succeed.  -   Mark Twain
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro