From: gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: Susan's Devolution: Impossible, one can't devolve that far (was Re: Chaney's evolution
Keywords: Chaney does hypocrisy
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Distribution: world  
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 17:49:36 GMT

<1992Jul24.000728.19157@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) said:
><1992Jul23.201259.13082@cs.cmu.edu> garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
>><1992Jul13.180817.8498@csus.edu# chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu (Steve Chaney) writes:
>>And, finally, he endorses O.R.'s violent tactics wholeheartedly and
>>says:
>>
>><1992Jul23.162222.2854@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>>#That depends. If the rally is at the clinic, he would call the cops
>>#and the RESCUERS would get their asses beat. 
>>#
>>#If he's at their meetings and he tries to cause trouble, that'll be
>>#the last time we ever see Chris Long. 
>>#
>>#I hope. 
>
>I said: 
>1) If he catches OR committing the crime, he ought to call the cops
>and OR would get their _asses_ beat and then thrown in jail. 

Why do you insist on endorsing police brutality?  The rest of the country
seems pretty sick of hearing of police violence.

...
>2) If he bothers them at their meetings, where no crime is being
>committed, or at their rallies, where they're pep-talking and just
>gathering for a morale boost, they may beat _HIM_ senseless, and

If they beat him for bothering them then THAT is a crime.  "Bother" is not
defined in your statement.  Most people take it to mean non-violent
unwanted interaction.  No one should be BEATEN because of this.

>deliver him to the _POLICE STATION_ where I hope they'll lock his
>nonsensible self up forever. Unfortunately, they'll let trash like
>that walk in a few months... 

I agree that our criminal and punitive codes desperately need an overhaul:
Example -- Tyson commits rape and gets 7 years w/no parole.  Alton-Harris
beats a man to death, and burns the body, and gets 8 years - *out in two*.

>Susan Garvin, you are stupid. I have been slamming and destroying your
>accusations about me so effectively and for so long now, that any
>leftover notions I had about your being highly intellegent, have now
>disappeared. 

I have seen you slamming yourself against her arguments for a while now.
I haven't seen you make much of a dent though.

>Your intellegence has devolved to the level of a paramecium, not to
>mention your blatant, in-your-face lies. 

Ooh!  Name calling!  I would have thought this would be irrelevent to the
Borg.

>Susan, are you one of those people whose faces I keep seeing above the
>words, "One more reason to keep abortion legal?" 

I always thought Quayle deserved that honor.

>I really have to work hard to convince people after they've seen
>genuine screw-ups like you, that abortion should be banned... 
> 
>===============================================================================
>		  Pro-Choice means pro-adult/child sex! 
>===============================================================================

And I always have to remind people that not all pro-lifers are complete
idiots after they see your signature.


Gordon
Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), and Diana (Sorceress), 
and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it all.
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: talk.abortion