HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne)
Subject: Re: SCC Unsolved Mystery.
Organization: Computer "Science" Dept, Yale University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 16:56:51 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.101851.27723@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>, xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
<
<A man on the road side came to
<me and greeted me: "You are Li Xiaolin". I asked who was
<him and he said he was Li Canhao. We then became friends
<had a nice chat.

You became friends?  I'll have to ask Canhao about that.

<After we came back from Washington, we saw a rumor in SCC
<saying that Li Peng was Jiang Qing's son. Some people
<tried to find evidence for it. I posted a follow-up and
<saying the story was very interesting.

Where do you people get this rubbish?!  A little knowledge and some
arithmetic will reveal that Li Peng could not possibly be Jiang Qing's son.
Ah, but don't let me get in the way of your rumour-mongering.  Wouldn't
want to interfere with bullshit in the works.

<I had been a permanant
<enemy of Li Canhao since then.

Since long before then, I imagine.  :-)

<Li Canhao disappeared from SCC later on. Some people say that
<he is still watching. He is in Columbus Ohio. Can any one
<in SCC solve this mystery.

I can--but won't.

					--Scott

-- 
Scott Horne                               ...!{harvard,cmcl2,decvax}!yale!horne
horne@cs.Yale.edu      SnailMail:  Box 7196 Yale Station, New Haven, CT   06520
203 436-1848                Residence:  Rm 1848 Silliman College, New Haven, CT
ZANG4 HAN4 YI4 JIA1 / GONG4 JIAN4 ZHONG1HUA2!
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong
From: cyeh@descartes.waterloo.edu (Woody)
Subject: Re: When is Qing1 Ming2?
Keywords: calendar
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 13:49:09 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.020813.395@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> hyx1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Harry Y Xu) writes:
>cyeh@descartes.waterloo.edu (Woody) writes:
>>wlin@byron.u.washington.edu (Wei Lin) writes:
>>>
>>>The apt name is Xia4Li4 (Chinese calendar) or Nong2Li4 (Agricultural
>>>calendar). Xia4 is as in Hua2 Xia4 (China).
>>>	    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>	Actually, it is as Xia4 dynasty. That is when it is established.
>
>	I don't believe it's established during Xia4 dynasty.
>	Historians can even agree on the existence of Xia4.
>	Can u site reliable reference to support u opinion? 
>
	Hmmm..... I know KMT was good at making phony history, but I don't
	think it is necessary to fake this one.    ;)  (just kidding)
	I read it from my high school history text. It is either in grade 10 or
	grade 11.

-- 

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne)
Subject: Re: Russkij jazyk (Re: Xue2xi2 Li3 Peng2, hao3 bang3yang4?  : -)  (Re: Li Peng getting a sense of humor.))
Organization: Computer "Science" Dept, Yale University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 06:02:51 GMT

In article <8921@scott.ed.ac.uk>, iad@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Ivan A Derzhanski) writes:
<In article <11998@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> xu@toadflax.UUCP (Hao Xu) writes:
<<In article <1992Apr6.221625.29077@cs.yale.edu> horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes:
<<>In article <1992Apr6.213925.5745@acsu.buffalo.edu>, xiaofei@acsu.buffalo.edu (XiaoFei Wang) writes:
<<><
<<><SCCers should not feel ashamed for not being able to speak Russian.
<<><Scott Horne can not speak it either. 
<<
<<Nice point. However, even if Scott can speak Russian, <...>
<
<It happens that he can, although his Russian is not flawless.

Indeed.  Far from it, in fact, but still much better than Xiao-Fei (who
may have never learned more than _Narodnaja kommuna, ehto xorosho_).

Of course, what can we expect from Xiao-Fei, who has the nerve to try to
"correct" my English?

<<>Ty ne prav, Shiao-Fej.  Ja govorju po-russki, a ne tak khorosho.
<<>					--Scott (Vstavaj, prokljat'ej
<<>					  zaklejmjonnyy....)
<<
<<Isn't this behavior childish?
<
<Whose behaviour?  Making wild statements about Scott not being able to
<speak Russian is certainly as childish a behaviour as it goes.

I should note that Xiao-Fei hasn't issued an apology, in e-mail or on the
net--thus proving that Ivan was wrong about the limits of childish behaviour.
Arrogance knows no bounds, it seems....

					--Scott (Ves' mir golodnix i rabov)

-- 
Scott Horne                               ...!{harvard,cmcl2,decvax}!yale!horne
horne@cs.Yale.edu      SnailMail:  Box 7196 Yale Station, New Haven, CT   06520
203 436-1848                Residence:  Rm 1848 Silliman College, New Haven, CT
ZANG4 HAN4 YI4 JIA1 / GONG4 JIAN4 ZHONG1HUA2!
From: yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh)
Subject: 6.4 red card is blood abuse (Re: 6/4, green card, etc.)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Organization: Netix Communications, Inc.
Date: 13 Apr 92 09:35:35 GMT

In article <9204122024.AA06599@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu>, xu@CS.UCDAVIS.EDU (Hao Xu) wrote:

+In article <29E7B015.21573@noiro.acs.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
+>+>	2.  I myself had been excercising my freedom of speech in Beijing for
+>+>	    years and they never "simply arrest" me.  But I want to tell you, 
+>+>	    some FUCKED-UP professors at my university (in Beijing) tried to 
+>+>	    screw me very hard.  	
+>+
+>+Academically?
+>
+>	totally non-academic.  Some people call that campus as
+>	Ke(science)Ji(tech)Dang(party)Xiao(school), and some call it as 
+>	concentration camp.
+
+My sympath to you. So the party prosecuted you. How can you say you
+had the freedom of speech. Remember, the definition of freedom of speech
+is NOT that one can speak without been arrested, but that once can speak
+without being harrassed INCLUDING not being arrested and not being screwed.

	No, the party treated me Okay.  So does the government.  As I said 
	hundreds of times, most of those intra-Chinese conflicts are NOT NOT
	caused by CCP or directed by CCP!!!!  The simplest example is: in 
	Taiwan, there is no CCP in power, they (so called Taiwanese) have never
	stopped fighting.

+>+>+   A fundamental question: Who killed those demonstrated in TAM? Who?
+>+>+Chinese students here? or CCP in Beijing? Is CCP ( by the way donkey
+>+>+Scott always apologizes for ) order the killing of thousands in 1989?
+>+>
+>+>	You students caused the killing!! You did not give them any additional
+>+>	choice!
+>+
+>+Shannon, I really feel I have no additional choice after you said this. May
+>+I kill you?
+>
+>	What?  you want to get two green cards for yourself?  (Beijing blood
+>	give you one green card, and my blood helps you with one more green
+>	card?)
+
+I wonder how far your speculation will go. I came here after April 1, 90,
+thus I can by no means take advantage from the executive order or the new
+regulation. The 6/4 card simply can't be related to me. But I do believe
+you can take the advantage. 

	Oh, that's why you want to CREATE some 6.4 compatibles so that
	you can get an easy green card.

+What I insinuated by the question is: if one doesn't have additional choice,
+killing is then justified? If you don't think I have the right to kill you,
+what the hell you think the CCP had the right to kill the students?

	Be careful with your statement, i might kill you be4 you do
	your killing, because i can legally excercise my self-defense 
	"human right".  That's basically why you students were in trouble
	in TAM in 1989.

+BTW, is your blood green? Otherwise how can it help me with my green card?
+I know some insects' blood is green :-))

	No, blood is Red, and the 6.4 "green cards" are Red, too.

shannon
-------
From: bbs@medsys.rn.com (Public BBS System)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: appendix to "4 big freedom"
Date: 7 Apr 92 21:40:56 GMT
Reply-To: bbs@medsys.UUCP (Public BBS System)
Organization: Med-Systems, Kingsport, Tennessee

In article <29DFBFC6.15158@orion.oac.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
>
>    --|--|--  __\|/___  _|==|__  /==|==   ==|== ---/    ____\____      |
>    __|__|__  | |==| |   / |-      |==|   --|--  | \    | / | \ |      /\
>      /  \       /|__\  /|_|___   ==||==    |    |\/      --|--|      /  \
>    				  --||--                    | \|     /    \
>
>    ===|=== ===|    ___\____    /--|/---|
>      /|-   |__\    | ---/ |     |-|  / |
>     /\|_______        /\/       |_|   \|
>       		       /|\
>                       \| \
>

That is why CCP must keep people poor so there is always poor people
who need help. If people were rich, there would be no reason for CCP
to be there.

Chou1
Xref: sparky soc.culture.china:12843 soc.culture.taiwan:7373 soc.culture.hongkong:5661
From: pcli@uicadf.csl.uiuc.edu (Ping-Chung Li)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong
Subject: Chinese Zodiac
Date: 13 Apr 1992 17:15:19 GMT
Organization: Coordinated Science Lab., University of Illinois
NNTP-Posting-Host: uicadf.csl.uiuc.edu
Keywords: calendar

	Since many people are talking about lunar and solar calendar. Here
I got one thing also related to both calendars--> Chinese zodiac.
	You probably think Chinese zodiac only relates to lunar calendar; 
i.e., we use lunar calendar to decide which Shen(1)-xiao(4) we belong to. 
However, I heard that there's an exception. If the Lunar Jan. 1. is located 
after Li(4)- chun(1), then all the children born between Li(4)-chun(1) and 
lunar new year are considered the next Shen(1)-xiao(4).
	For example, if last year is dragon year and the Chinese new year is 
Feb. 10, Li(4)-chun(1) is Feb. 4. then all the babies born between Feb. 4 
and Feb 10 are with Shen(1)-xiao(4) snake.
	Anyone can confirm this and explain why?

Ping
ps: Why do I care? Because I was born after Li(4)-Chun(1) and before New year 
    day. 8-)
From: wang@BAEPV2.NCSU.EDU
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Info on small private business in China
Date: 15 Apr 92 01:08:28 GMT
Reply-To: wang@BAEPV2.NCSU.EDU
Organization: North Carolina State University

>> ...
>> 
>> >	  where do I go to get permission, what is the processure;
>> 
>>           Bring three bottles of Maotai and a set of color TV  or $500 to 
>> the people in Industrial & Commerical Administration to get permission.  
>> 
>
>   I am sure it will be very helpful.  But my personality allows me to throw
>the Maotais into sea rather than brible government officials.  Brible will just
>spoil them in the long run and will my life not free of nonsense obligation.

    Then you have to wait three or five years to get permission or never !!!
From: xu@CS.UCDAVIS.EDU (Hao Xu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6/4, green card, etc.
Date: 12 Apr 92 20:49:30 GMT


In article <29E7B015.21573@noiro.acs.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
>+
>+Shannon, it is long since you sold your 4 big freedom. Where is it now?
>+Since you advocate 4 big freedom in China, why don't you try to carry it out
>+in China? Why only advocate it in the States? Oh, I see, you need to protect
>+yourself. May I ask which party is now protecting your freedom of speech?
>+Third or fourth or fifth? Isn't it hypocratic?
>
>	Thank you for mentioning my "4 big freedom".  This idea has obtained 
>	good "market sharing".  I and my comrades will do whatever we can
>	to implement these freedoms for China.

Shannon, you stiil fail to answer my question. Other people wanted to
fight freedom for China, you told them "if you really want it, stay in China,
don't come to the US." Now, you said you want to fight freedom for China.
Apply your own logic to yourself, I suppose you will go back to China. Now,
answer me whether you are going to go back, and when.

>	Also, my "4 big freedom" has got unbelievable, "operational" response
>	from people in China.  

Are you going to ask people in China to fight for your 4 big freedom while
you yourself stay here safely? If so, what's the difference between you and
the d-fighters you accused? If not, when will you go back to China?

Hao

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: lzh@cco.caltech.edu (Zhaohong Li)
Subject: Soccer: US 5: 0 China
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 1992 20:20:29 GMT

In the afternoon of April 4th, the US national soccer
team hosted a visiting Chinese team at Stanford Stadium.

The anouncer said the Chinese team waS A national team.
However, several netters have pointed out earlier that 
it was a united team of Guangdong and Guangzhou with 3
players of other provinces. Still it had several former
national team players. Sorry I won't be able to give 
an account oF HOW the game went. From the US 5:0 China
score, fans can pretty much guess.

On that night, Chinese women's volleyball team had a
match WIth the US team. 3:2 China won. It was a game that
worth my money.

In both the soccer game and volleball game, I saw people
holding banner of Goddess of Democracy and signs reading
Never Forget June 4th.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong
From: mjln_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Mikeey J. Lin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Olympic games in Beijing
Date: 10 Apr 92 01:26:44 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York


	I personally would object to the Olympics being held in Beijng
because of "Human Rights" issue. If China wants the Olympics to be held
in Beijing, we have to see reforms soon. IMHO of course.

						Mikeey
				    mjln_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: b672zbg@utarlg.uta.edu ( SINGHAL)
Subject: Re: help on getting a list of travel agencies in California
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: The University of Texas at Arlington
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 08:37:00 GMT

In article <70348@ut-emx.uucp>, chuckt@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu () writes...
> 
>Dear folks in California,
> 
>I am trying to get a round-trip ticket from Shanghai, PRC to the states and 
>I am advised to do it through the travel agencies in California since they
>are more specialized in this kind of business.
> 
>If you happen to know the names and phone numbers of those agencies, I would
>appreciate if you could mail me a list of them(especially those operated by 
>Chinese). Thanks a lot.

I don't have a list of those agencies but one. 

         Mandarin Travel
         985 N. Broadway
         Los Angeles, CA 90012
         (213) 626-13511
         Agent: Francis Chen

         Round-trip fare: $1185.00/person
         Airline: Northwest(747)

Hope this helps. Good luck.
From: chuckt@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: help on getting a list of travel agencies in California
Date: 15 Apr 92 15:52:07 GMT
Reply-To: chuckt@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu ()
Distribution: usa
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX
Originator: chuckt@doc.cc.utexas.edu


Dear folks in California,

I am trying to get a round-trip ticket from Shanghai, PRC to the states and 
I am advised to do it through the travel agencies in California since they
are more specialized in this kind of business.

If you happen to know the names and phone numbers of those agencies, I would
appreciate if you could mail me a list of them(especially those operated by 
Chinese). Thanks a lot.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: xiao-lin li <xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: THE LIER SHOULD BE PUNISHED(KILLED OR WHATEVER PROPER)
Keywords: lier, punished
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 10:37:00 -0500

>   We  chinese who came before 4/11/90  are very sensitive about the
>final result of President Bush' special order. Those who(Xiao Li etc)
>intended to fool all these students should check if he is a humane being
>or beasts like Tiananmen Square killers. Chinese are characterized
>by their honest. Those who lie publicly today could be a potential
>killer tomorrow or be punished by their behavor later. No wonder
>people call Xiao Li a son of Li Peng ------- they are from the same
>killing family. Be careful when you liers are lying!
>
>Feng ZOU

Dear Mr. Feng Zou:

Nothing in that post was fabricated. It was an error that it
had become the Public Law. But that was also an honest error.
I have already indicated the source of the error.

Get the fact, use your mind.

My best wishes to you.

Xiao Li
From: xu@toadflax.cs.ucdavis.edu (Hao Xu)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6.4 red card is blood abuse (Re: 6.4, green card, freedom...)
Date: 13 Apr 92 21:37:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: ucdavis.12193
Reply-To: xu@toadflax.UUCP (Hao Xu)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis

In article <29E958D1.12001@noiro.acs.uci.edu> yeh@netix.com (Shannon Yeh) writes:
>
>+That's why there are many people RETURNED to China in the 50s.  Is there
>+a call for "the construction of a democratic system for China" now??? !!!
>
>	I have called for several times.

When did you replace Jiang Zheming?

Hao
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china,soc.culture.taiwan,soc.culture.hongkong
From: rk7151@csc.albany.edu (KWOK RAYMOND Y)
Subject: Re: Chinese Zodiac
Organization: State University of New York at Albany
	<kujgd7INNdsg@roundup.crhc.uiuc.edu>
	<1992Apr14.120544.1787@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au>
Date: 14 Apr 92 13:13:45

In article <1992Apr14.120544.1787@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au> 88p8337@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au (Antartica Archer(tm)) writes:

>   In article <kujgd7INNdsg@roundup.crhc.uiuc.edu>, pcli@uicadf.csl.uiuc.edu (Ping-Chung Li) writes:
>
>> However, I heard that there's an exception. If the Lunar Jan. 1. is located 
>> after Li(4)- chun(1), then all the children born between Li(4)-chun(1) and 
>> lunar new year are considered the next Shen(1)-xiao(4).
>> 	For example, if last year is dragon year and the Chinese new year is 
>> Feb. 10, Li(4)-chun(1) is Feb. 4. then all the babies born between Feb. 4 
>> and Feb 10 are with Shen(1)-xiao(4) snake.
>> 	Anyone can confirm this and explain why?
>
>   I do not intend to "confirm" anything here. What I heard is that it is only
>   one of those many calendric theories. Ionsiders Li-chun as the beginning
>   of a new year. 

	FYI, some calendric theories refers DongChi as the beginning
	of the year instead of LiChun.
Ray

-- 
  Raymond Kwok Yin Lung	kwok@cs.albany.edu
Spring has arrived at Albany. According to weather forecase, we
will have a warm Easter.  Happy Easter to everyone.
From: jialin@dogwood.botany.uga.edu (Jialin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Chinese Nationals Came Before 4/1/90 Will Have Greencard.
Date: 8 Apr 92 19:25:30 GMT
Organization: Botany Department - U of Georgia, Athens

In article <1992Apr8.122437.7603@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
>
>One netter has verified this news from the senate. The bill
>has been passed and is now the Public Law #101-649.

The Senate reads soc.culture.china, now that's a news. 

Jialin
                      /|  0      \\    -  _            
           --- ----~ | --------- |  ---)    ;_\__     
    _ )~   /---\     |          / _____     ( ___)    
   (_|____||(O) \____|_________/_/|(O) \_______/=o     z forever  71' 83'
   _ ______\___/__________________\___/____________~~______________________

"Li Peng is certainly better educated than the old generation.." - Li Xiaolin

"The table in front of a classroom in Peking University is also well 
 educated. "                                                     - Xi Chen
From: jialin@dogwood.botany.uga.edu (Jialin)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: More Songs available.  Re: "Revolutionary Modern Beijing Opera
Keywords: Li Tie-Mei and Yang Zi-Rong
Date: 15 Apr 92 01:41:34 GMT
Organization: Botany Department - U of Georgia, Athens

In article <1992Apr14.182545.6460@sunova.ssc.gov> jigang@dale.ssc.gov (Jigang Yang) writes:
>
>     Xiaoyu has put more audio files on anonymous ftp of dale.ssc.gov
>(in ~/pub/chinese/audio). All of them are sun audio files. If you have
>a sun workstation, you can simply cat file > /dev/audio or use openwin
>audio tool, or use voice mail. So you can try different ways to scare 
>devils to the hell.:-)
>
>     By the way, if you have some audio files of chinese songs and
>you are willing to share with others, contact me and I will try to
>put on this ftp site as long as I have enough diskspace.


I have "When Harry met Sally" :-) 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: yzg9890@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (just call me joe )
Subject: Re: one coner of my Beijing life (follow-up to "red card" discussion)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 19:50:37 GMT

srzhang@mth.msu.edu (Shuren Zhang) writes:

>  Shannon seems to mean that those professors had nothing to do with CCP. 
>You are wrong.   Those professors had CCP memberships and had been tamed by
>CCP to do evil to people.   CCP has made morales of Chinese intelectuals
>go down.  

   Correct! I am happened to know a few of them.

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
From: kniaz@cat5.cs.wisc.edu (Joel Kniaz)
Subject: Re: SCC Unsolved Mystery.
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison -- Computer Sciences Dept.
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 13:50:37 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.002859.9825@cs.yale.edu> horne-scott@CS.YALE.EDU (Scott Horne) writes:
>In article <1992Apr10.180536.11036@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>, xiao-lin li <xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu> writes:
><In article <11APR199200391838@vxcrna.cern.ch> yang@vsoph8.cern.ch writes:



><I think you are an idiot! 
>
>Then I think you are an idiot.


	Wow!   With this kind of insightful debating, perhaps you too
	should run for public office...

     ______________________________________________________________________
    / "Lo, Though I walk through the valley in the shadow of death,       /
    \    I fear not!                                        ______________\
    /  For I am the biggest son-of-a-bitch in the valley." / My favorite  /
    \______________________________________________________\ expression...\
    / Joel Kniaz   kniaz@garfield.cs.wisc.edu  kniaz@jomby /      __i     /
    \______________________________________________________\_yiLballe(Mu)_\
From: river@garnet.berkeley.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Ugly Chinese
Date: 16 Apr 92 20:01:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: agate.skmekINN7c0
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu
Originator: river@garnet.berkeley.edu


                  Ugly Chinese in SCC

       There are a lot of ugry Chinese students and scholars (CSS) in 
Soc.culture.china( SCC ) as well as in U.S.. In addition some American
become so mean and ugry and each of them counts as half ugry Chinese.
       They are more ugly than the ugly Chinese in China. Here are
what they are:
       1. Fight their country men who do well. The ugly always try
          to make troubles and fail others.
          Examples:
          Common here, though here is U.S..
       2. Red eye disease. 
          Type 1. If I benefit from something, you can't. 
          Type 2, if I can't benefit, you cant. 
          Examples:
          These include those are against the bill that protects 
          Chinese students and scholars.
       3. Say something loudly, but does nothing, instead, ask others 
          to do. 
          Examples:
          These include those who say they care about democracy in 
          China, but have no action, such as Scott Horme, Shannon Yeh
          type, in their heart, they are actrually against democracy.
From: KF-HUA@disuns2.epfl.ch
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: 6/4, green card, etc.
Date: 13 Apr 92 07:12:39 GMT
Organization: EPFL

It becomes less and less interesting to discuss (really to quarrel on this
subject). Is it going to be quiescent? I wonder if that's the result of
the education of "culture revolution". From reading some of the articles, I even can't believe that are out off well educated CSSs.





 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china