HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: diane@greenland.island.COM ()
Subject: GL
Originator: diane@greenland
Organization: Island Graphics, Marin County, California
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 14:35:10 GMT

 I know that this sounds crazy, but I want to bet that Ed gets his comforting
 from Blake.

 I also think that Roger has completely set up Jenna - and that the Spauldings
 do not owe Jenna anything.

 And....

 I think that since Nadine is still married to Frank Sr. Bridgett will end up 
 keeping her baby - and perhaps fighting with Roger and Hart for custody.  
 Their argument being "Hey she was going to give the baby to Nadine - and we 
 are family". 

 and lastly

 Alan-Michael will lose Elani just around the time of the birth of (Franks)
 baby and will try to get custody of him/her.

 JUST SPECULATING...........

 diane@SpauldingVault


-- 
Diane Ascher						sun!island!diane
SoapBox Radio Program - KSRO - 1350 AM - Santa Rosa, CA - Sat 1:00pm PST
"More time is spent watching soaps than sports" -- me
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: EFS6ET1@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU
Subject: DOOL: Will I survive Julie's final "Days?"
Reply-To: ecz5mxr@mvs.oac.ucla.edu
Date: 22 Jan 93 10:06:22 PST

OK, I know it's another Julie post, but what did you expect from me
during her final week?

Sisters Garlic and Tangy have already e-mailed me off-net, so I
know I'm not alone.  When I watched ysterday's show (1/21) all
I could see during Julie's scenes was SSH trying desperately not
to cry.  I know for a fact that the scene with Suzanne Rogers
(one of SSH's best friends for the past 18 years) had to be redone
several times because SSH kept crying.  And, from the character
point of view, that was wrong, because Julie didn't know she'd
be leaving.  SSH reported that Suzanne was wonderful and esp.
supportive that day.  SSH apparently kept a death grip on
Suzanne's hand in an effort to keep from crying.  Sigh...

On a positive note, I did love SSH's ad-lib about odd taking on
a whole new meaning once you knew Jack Deveraux.

OK, I promise to shut up now.  But I was already crying yesterday,
I may not survive her last two shows.  (Jo-Jo, I may need that
Bayview Pass fast!)
*A depressed Razzleberry
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC:TAN:What "other" newsgroups do you read?
From: mitch@cdthq.UUCP (Mitch Harris)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 16:08:34 CST
Organization: Garys' Home for Obsolete Computers

zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria) writes:

> In article <4H2NXB2w161w@cdthq.UUCP> mitch@cdthq.UUCP (Mitch Harris) writes:
> >Well, y'all seem to be a more....hmmmm....enlightened? intelligent? maybe 
> >classier bunch than I. I read (fairly regugarly)...
> >alt. sex. bondage
> >alt. sex. wizards
> 
> Sex.bondage and sex.wizards, huh? hmmmm pretty interesting. No wonder
> Mitch is so in love with you! :-))))))))
> 
> CAZ


HAHAHAHAHAA! If I *practiced* what I read, I'd be the Widow Harris!

......Beverly H.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jereese@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (jean reese)
Subject: Re: SB: Jan 15th
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 13:19:08 GMT

In article <93019.165031RAMETZ01@ULKYVM.BITNET> Robert A. Metzger <RAMETZ01@ULKYVM.BITNET> writes:
>I just thought of something.  Was CC's comment about everything working out on
>the 15th left out??  I have watched it twice, and do not remember anything
>being said about this.  Anyone got any ideas??

What do you mean 'left out'? Do you mean we forgot to report it or that
not everything worked out? We did report it, although I forgot in my
regular update, I think Pat caught it and commented on it. 

Jean


-- 
	"It is my view that the  vegetarian manner  of living by its 
	purely physical effect on the  human temperament  would most 
	beneficially influence the lot of mankind." - Albert Einstein
	++++++++++++++++jereese@silver.ucs.indiana.edu+++++++++++++++
From: joyce@deco.csd.sgi.com (Joyce Richards)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB: more memories con't
Date: 23 Jan 93 02:38:44 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

i don't know about the rest of you, but i wasn't 14, and i liked
kellyI.  she had an angst about her.  as did masonI.
i think people forget that this was a dark family.
they were a little sad, a little used.  and they wore beautiful clothing.
now why i liked that i don't know.  i wasn't 14, afterall. ;-)

when SB went off the air, they were a different crowd.
it was a new day.  clinton was in the white house.
there was so much change in the air that they weren't
much like the original bunch...and focus had changed right
over to the walkers.  who were white-bread.  but what the hell.
the show was going off the air anyway.

i think kellyII played kelly in a cheap way.  not elegant enough.
kellyIII was good enough.  
the nice little sister.  she bit her bottom lip a lot.
she convinced me she was overshadowed by the golden girl, eden.
[note:  why did she leave the show?  was she fired?  did she go
 to another soap?]

kellyIV was very bad when she was with cruz.  then she
was ok when paired with mcbabe, who was good to look at but
no great shakes either.  a perfect match! 

overall i rate the kelly's in this order:
kellyI, kellyIII, kellyIV, and kellyII.

that i spent 10 minutes typing this in amuses me greatly.

joyce.

-- 
---

          joyce richards       PSE       
          joyce@sgi.com        Silicon Graphics, Inc.
From: 00dcgarringe@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: GH: Jake sighting
Date: 24 Jan 93 02:52:03 GMT
Organization: Ball State University, Muncie, In - Univ. Computing Svc's


 For all your Jake Meyer fans, I caught him in a small part in the new
movie _Alive_ tonight. He played Javier, the one whose wife died and
was the last one to decide to eat. For having barely any words, he does
a good job.

-- 
Donna Garringer,
Ball State University.
koosh@bsu-cs.bsu.edu                       
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kudra@hubcap.clemson.edu (sallie j kudra)
Subject: Re: DOOL: TAN: Best Peel Sister by far
Organization: Clemson University
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 15:16:42 GMT

The Evil One vir8334@tamsun.tamu.edu (Vince Rhee) writes:

>Our own kudra@hubcap.clemson.edu (sallie j kudra) states :
>>

>	[glowing -- gack! -- praise of the Demonic One deleted
>	 in the interest of good taste 8^)]

         Get a grip EV.  Just because you and Lemon disagree about Texas
         football doesn't mean she doesn't deserve praise when warranted!

>>Well, I just had to let everyone know what a true sister Lemon is.  I'll be 
>>checking this episode out this afternoon prior to Fridays and todays.

>	Oh great, just what we need -- an ego boost for the
>	yellow citrus. As if things weren't bad enough
>	already... :-)

        Women don't need ego boosts.......  We KNOW we are superior and the
        most superior are (putting on flame suit and jet pack) the Southern
        ones!


>>Nectarine "Lemon shall always be the Postamatic Supreme" Peel

>	Yeah, yeah -- whatever.

        Tacky, tacky EV, cutting off my .sig.  I would never do that to you,
        uh uh, noway (grinning maniacally with her fingers poised to hit dd).
>TTFN,
>- EV (who got to see Alan Jackson/Hal Ketchum in concert here at
>      Jolly Rollie last night...GREAT show...hee hee...)

Naughty Nectarine "She's bacccckkkkkk" Peel

Tight pants and lipstick                           | Sallie J. Kudra, P/A III
She's ridin' on a razor's edge                     | Info. Systems Development
She holds her own against the boys                 | Clemson Univ. Clemson,SC
Cuts thru the crowd just like a wedge - Sammy Hagar| kudra@hubcap.clemson.edu 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: lizb@banyan.com
Subject: Re: GL: Future speculation (SPOILER)
Organization: Banyan Systems, Inc.
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 22:47:30 GMT

In article <1jrcqkINNr11@morrow.stanford.edu> GC.AVW@forsythe.stanford.edu (RAGIN CAJUN) writes:
>In article <14282@pogo.wv.tek.com>,
>debraa@poof.WV.TEK.COM (Debra Aubrey;685-3679;63-356;;poof) writes:
>>
>>In article <1993Jan21.204605.4575@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu>,
>>lizb@banyan.com writes:
>>|> Little spoilers:
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|>
>>|> I read in one of the rags (SOD maybe?  The Feb. preview?) that Ed will
>>|> seek comfort from "a surprising source."
>>|>
>>|> How about Jenna???
>>|>
>>|> Liz
>>
>>
>>I think it will be Holly ... they can help each other feeeeeeeel better. ;-)
>>
>>        Debbie.
>
>
>I don't think that would be a surprise to anyone-boring and
>predictable would be more like it.
>
>Alma

I have to agree with you on that; but then again, didn't SOD also tell
us we'd be "shocked and surprised" by the death of a regular in Jan.?

This may be a little judgemental of me, but I think it would be
DEPLORABLE for Ed to seek comfort from yet another woman with whom
he'd been unfailthful to Maureen.  Then again, I'm coming around slowly;
two weeks ago I felt the only just fate for the character would be life
in a monastery!

So, it probably won't be Jenna; but you have to admit, the plot 
possibilities would be pretty interesting...;-)

Liz
lizb@banyan.com
From: masri@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: AMC: TAN
Date: 27 Jan 93 21:17:35 GMT
Reply-To: masri@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University

What does this mean:  :-)    I've been wondering for awhile now!

Debbie
From: johnson@emx.cc.utexas.edu (Karen Johnson Morgan)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC - various insightful remarks
Date: 22 Jan 1993 13:50:42 -0600
Organization: U. Texas Center for Space Research
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: emx.cc.utexas.edu

In article <1jpgl4INNebu@roundup.crhc.uiuc.edu> mary@uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu (Mary E. Allison) writes:
>
>Pam Nelson and Karen Morgan - THANKS for the MEK report.
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

You're welcome, Mary -- wish you could have been here.

>
>I want to call THEM in to do MY wedding  -- well on SECOND thought.

Now, when is your wedding again?  I missed a few weeks a while back and
missed the big news!

>So - I end up having this DREAM last night about the Bradys and
>planning my wedding and walking with Peter have having him say
>"porkchops and applesauce."  I'm reading too much rats.

:-)

You UIUC people sound like a fun bunch!!  

Karen

-- 
        karen@louise.ae.utexas.edu   -or-   johnson@emx.utexas.edu
From: lcheap@cac.washington.edu (Laurel Cheap )
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: those damn interruptions...
Date: 25 Jan 93 20:26:41 GMT
Organization: UW Computing
NNTP-Posting-Host: redx.cac.washington.edu

In article <C161A7.8FI@SSD.intel.com>, karinc@ssd.intel.com (Karin Coffee) writes:
|> In article <kfLJxnG00iUzE1Fwdt@andrew.cmu.edu> Jennifer Allyson Turner <jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
|> *>I am sure you are all aware of this but I would be forewarned that AMC
|> *>might not be on at all the next couple days due to the Presidential
|> *>Inauguration. I know they are starting live coverage today at noon
|> *>and tomorrow at 11 (East Coast)...I heard the Parade is at 1:00 I think
|> *>(same time as AMC...) :-( Oh well..., I guess its important enuf :)
|> *
|> *After the show was over, they specifically said that AMC would be shown
|> *at its regular time.  Nothing about the other soaps, though...
|> 
|> Yeah, we got the same voice-over.  The TV Guide has AMC on at 10am.  I'm
|> recording the 6 hours starting at 9am and ending at 3pm.  I'm guessing it
|> will be in there somewhere.  :-)

Yes, it was on at 10am on the west coast but then so was the big wind storm!
AMC was interrupted so we could see trees blowing in the wind and waves on
the lakes!  And then when they returned to AMC, the cable went out.  Shortly
thereafter so did the power.  It was just bad karma or something. :(
Thank goodness for the updates! :)

-Laurel "great Seattle Inauguration Day windstorm of 1993 survivor"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laurel Cheap           University of Washington   lcheap@u.washington.edu
Information Systems    Seattle, Washington  USA   a.k.a. Brendan's mommy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: across@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (cross amy hamilton)
Subject: AMC:Okay,Okay I'll post
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 16:14:18 GMT

To one and all who issued me an invitation to post.  See, I
really can do it.

CZ- I admire most of your character list-as you say MEK is
obvious, although I get a little tired of Haley going back
and forth from an "almost" innocent little girl to a lush.
The levels that Adam can sink to never cease to amaze me.

I like the NewNotNat- or at least I like the abbreviation.

I need a more current update- the last I caught was last
Friday (1/22).

Amy (Judi's Friend) Cross
From: dgalvin@uoft02.utoledo.edu (Dan Galvin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: TAD:Musings
Date: 27 Jan 93 16:18:35 GMT
Organization: University of Toledo / Recreation


> My favorite time period of AMC was back in the Jenny-Greg & Tad-Marion-liza
> days, the shows were great every day!! 
Ohh I agree with this one!  To watch Tad be on the tropical island (St.
somethingorother) AND manage to sleep with Liza  Marion at the same time is
what got me hooked on the bad-Tad character.  He was lying with and to everyone
around... I loved it!  Jenny and Greg were so pitiful and yet so preppy and
good, I used to LOVE Liza trying to get Greg away.  There was so much
backstabbing in those days, it made the show so exciting.  Greg's Mother was
such a country-club Bitch, I LOVed when she would try so hard to keep Greggy
happy, which usually meant it was the oppiste of what he really wanted.  And
Angie and Jessie!  All the obstacles they had to fight against, I remember the
connection that Jessie and Jenny were so close from the days in Center City,
and that relationship played so well between the four of them... but I digress!	
> I do hope they can work Tad in with Haley, Edmund and Charlie, what a great
> foursome...
This one may be tough.. I don't know if it would work...
-- 
-------------------------------------------------
Twenty-something for one more year *sigh*
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Dan Galvin ==========> DGALVIN@uoft02.utoledo.edu
University of Toledo <==> Office of Recreation
RCR0003@uoft01.bitnet / as427@Cleveland.Freenet.edu / 
------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: bodom@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Brian Odom)
Subject: Re: Y&R: Mamie 
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:09:46 GMT

In <1993Jan22.180140.6980@lclark.edu> snodgras@lclark.edu (Bil Snodgrass) writes:


>Well anyone who has a brain at least as large as a pea already knows
>that John and Jill will not be married for very long.  So here is 
>an idea....

>John and Mamie!!!  I mean it is a natural!  She has been there for
>the entire history.  The Children talk to her like a mother.  There
>has to be love there between her and John even though they haven't 
>recongized it yet!  I think it would be great and it could last forever!
>Real love does you know!

>Bil Snodgrass III

While we're on the interracial tip, why don't Dru and Blade get together?
Dru deserves better than Neil "my work is soooo important" Winters.  They're
made for each other, plus Blade has seen her naked.   hmmmm....
I wonder what Blade was thinking when he was taking those pictures.  Blade has
got to have the hots for her.  Just my thoughts.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mcmahon@nd.edu (Sheila M. McMahon)
Subject: ATWT: My Opinion and some Spoilers
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:31:46 GMT

For those of you who have not yet seen Yesterday's episode, you may want to 
stop reading right now...


Let me be the first to say that I think Edweenie was lying when she told 
GetEven that Cabot was his father.  This is a reversal of what I've thought
all along, but nevertheless, I'm changing my mind. I used to think that she
was discouraging a relationship between GetEven and RoseHand BECAUSE they 
were brother and sister, now I think she said they were brother and sister
simply as a means to keep her precious son away from a girl she can't 
control.

And now, some spoilers...

































This is from Soap opera digest (however it is just from memory)...

Nevins takes the stand Tuesday January 26 (which we already know)

Another surprising witness for the defense takes the stand, which makes
things even more difficult (haven't a clue who this could be)

Margo finds out the results of her final HIV test Wednesday (I didn't even
know that she took the test yet. If you read TV Guide, you already know the
results because it was printed in the edition from Jan 30 - Feb 5.)

The verdict for Margo's trial against Nevins comes down on Friday 

Happy Reading,
Irish
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo)
Subject: MB: Repeat of "Midnight Plane to Paris" episode
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 93 01:06:42 GMT

The "Murphy Brown" episode in which Murphy names the baby is supposed 
to be rebroadcast this Monday (Jan. 25) so check it out if you missed 
it the first time.  I know there were quite a few of you!

Joanna.

| \____ ----- ____/           |  "Let's just be friends -- friends   |
|      ( o o )                |  who never talk or see each other."  |
|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    |      - David Letterman, 7-22-92      |
|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! |       peea224@hermes.chpc.utexas.edu |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.movies,alt.tv.twin-peaks
From: mfw@cch.coventry.ac.uk (Lynch)
Subject: Re: Dune (long version) on WPIX!
Organization: Coventry University
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 12:05:41 GMT

In article <1993Jan17.085122.26482@omen.UUCP> caf@omen.UUCP (Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX) writes:
>The "onger version" isn't that much longer.  It does have some interesting
>added scenes, however.  The Princess's introduction is replaced by a
>narrated paintings that explain the state of civilization at the time.
>The narration is badly needed, but detracts from the elegance of the movie.
>
>I'm afraid Dune may not get a definitive presentation for a long time.
>Since the books were written, one of Dune's two main tenets (mind/drug
>power) has been broken, and nothing is in sight to fix it.

 I recently found a book in my loacal library called "Hoffman's Guide to Sf,
 Horror and Fantacy Movies". It said that Dune was originally a 12 hour 
 production, which became a nine part miniseire. It aslo says that due to
 gratuitous violance the press thrashed it, and was brought out on video soon
 after.

 I have only ever previously heared of the slightly longer version of Dune.
 Does anyone else know anything about this 12 hour production?

 Martin


-- 
JANET     mfw@uk.ac.coventry
INTERNET  mfw@cck.coventry.ac.uk

"Reserect as a feeling, on my window, of a past reunion." - Vince Clarke
From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Late Night opening sequence
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 93 13:24:25 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Distribution: usa
  <C19GIn.7KI@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>

>In article <1993Jan22.072308.6814@zia.aoc.nrao.edu> jogle@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (Ji
m
>
>Ogle (Ks. Jim)) writes:
>> I actually managed to turn on the set in time for the opening sequence
>> of Letterman's show and was greeted by a whiz-bang outer space
>> sequence - when did this start?  And who's the woman doing the
>> voiceover?
>
>This season, I think.  Don't know who the woman is.  Love the
>part where Dave flies by. :-)
>
>Anybody know what they did that on?  Many of the curved
>objects (like the red planetoid) have really bad faceted
>silhouettes, but overall it's neat.  The sound effects
>for the flock of ducks are great too!
>
>ab

   Can't say for sure, but I think the fancy, computer animation
   opening was introduced in last year's Anniversary Special.
   
   I love the ducks, too.
   
   -Brian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian S. Thorn                                    "If ignorance is bliss,
BrianT@cup.portal.com                               this must be heaven."
                                                -Diane Chambers, "Cheers"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Re: Name the Dog on Petticoat Junction!
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 05:32:06 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.153615.18531@utkux1.utk.edu> danny@martha.utcc.utk.edu (Danny William McCampbell) writes:
>Please somebody tell me the name of the dog on Petticoat Junction!
>I am desperate.

I don't know that, but how about this question - what's the name of 
the dog on Brady Bunch?

 spoilers ahead

Cindy!
-- 
John Switzer             | 1/21/93 - Clinton fails to follow through on promise
                         | to have economic legislation ready the day after the
Compuserve: 74076,1250   | Inauguration. Programmers rejoice because he gives 
Internet: jrs@netcom.com | them an excuse to further slip their schedules.
From: rost@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: RE:Hometime: Hello Robin (I still miss Jojo)
Date: 22 Jan 93 15:11:31 EST

Sure JoJo is missed, but I was beginning to like Susanne Eckley (sp).  What
happened to her?  I'm beginning to wonder if Dean might not be that easy to
work with. 

I like Susanne and I wish her the best.
with.
From: shkelnik@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Leslie Shkolnik)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 03:42:43 GMT
Subject: Re: QL: directors (new in cisco.com:/ql-archive/text/directors)
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv

How about a writer's list update?


Leslie
------
leslie@hpprsd1.mayfield.hp.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.sf.tv
From: jenkirtl@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (Jennifer Kirtley)
Subject: Re: QL: Speculation on Vampire Episode ...
Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 02115, USA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 02:32:52 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.004821.6703@leland.Stanford.EDU> firestar@leland.Stanford.EDU (Lipton Ann Meredith) writes:
>
>
>Does this mean that when Sam looks in the mirror to see what he looks like,
>he won't get a reflection?

>Firestar

"Oooh, boy!  I'm invisible!"


  -Jenni

"Theorizing that one could travel through Boston on the MBTA,
Dr. Sam Beckett stepped onto the Green Line...and vanished!
Trapped on the `T', Dr. Beckett finds himself leaping from
station to station, using `T' Passes that are not his own...
His only companion is Al, a `B' line car that only Sam can
see and ride..."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.sf.tv
From: leaper@ddsw1.mcs.com (Maria C. Munoz)
Subject: Re: QL: Coming out on videotape!
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:58:22 GMT
Organization: ddsw1.MCS.COM Contributor, Chicago, IL
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

	Sally,

	Do you know if they'll be keeping the airing order's leap outs?
Or will they go in order of the release?  I know *we* all, well, some of
us anyway, :) know the airing order...will they do in the airing order?
Something to think about.  I know I'll be getting the whole set. :)
-- 
**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""**""
Maria C. Munoz,                                    leaper@ddsw1.MCS.COM
President of Quantum Leap Enterprises Inc.       Chicago, Illinois U.S.A.
"Net.Saint" - Micki Duncan/Internet          "Where A LIFE Is A LEAP Away!"     
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv