From: root@june.cmp.rpi.edu (J.R. Ordon)
Subject: Re: Chelsea's school ...
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 17:59:24 GMT

In article <1993Jan8.153243.22028@lclark.edu> snodgras@lclark.edu (Bil Snodgrass) writes:
>In article <2z!37y_@rpi.edu> root@june.cmp.rpi.edu (J.R. Ordon) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan8.143512.21395@lclark.edu> snodgras@lclark.edu (Bil Snodgrass) writes:
>>>In article <-y!388#@rpi.edu> root@june.cmp.rpi.edu (J.R. Ordon) writes:
>>>>In article <1ij20hINNkhm@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> rww@mugwump.cl.msu.edu (Richard W. Wiggins) writes:
>>>
>>
>>Ah, but Quayle never was Commander in Chief, and we both know he would 
>>never be elected on his own.
>
>Now come on.... Don't go spacing out on me.  Quayle was one bullet 
>or one heart palputation away from being the Commander and Chief.
>The issue was brought up in the 1988 campaign and the Republicans
>said it wasn't an issue......period.  If Clinton's handling of his draft
>status is to be looked upon in a ethical and moral light then so must
>Quayle.  In that light it not only shows us that Quayle had poor
>judgement, but that the people who put him in to office were pretty 
>poor judges. 

Hey, I didn't say that I think Quayle was unqualified for president,
what I meant was the character assasination job the press did on him
made him un-electable.
Ted Kennedy called him one the best young senators in Congress, that is
until he was nominated, then politics take over.
  
>
>By the way, I love Clinton for saying what he did about the Vietnam War!
>I have nothing but admiration for him.....And the day this nation
>gets off its butt and truly helps Vietnam Vets. is the day I might
>let you argue the point with me......

Gee that's real "fair" of you, I love you liberals, you're for freedom
of speech...unless they disagree with you.

BTW, what part of what Clinton said about Vietnam do you like,
he's contradicted himself so many times!


>
> Besides, he did serve in the Ill. National
>
>He dodged it... He dodged it... He got his daddy to get him out of going
>over to Vietnam.....

At least he did LEGALLY!!! with or without his fathers help.
Clinton BROKE THE LAW by backing out of his ROTC deferment.



>
>
>>Guard and there was a chance, albeit small, that his unit could have 
>>gone to Vietnam.
>
>And Clinton registered and got his number and "there was a chance, albeit
>a small one, that he could have gone to Vietnam."
>
> This was no chance that Clinton would be sent, since
>>we was a civilian.
>
>I am sorry, there was a chance, albeit a small one!
>
> My problem with Clinton is the way he stayed out of
>>Military service, and changes in his story on the Campaign trail.
>
>You know sometimes people are really dumb.  He came out about it
>in all places in a convention filled with Vets.  He said he opposed
>the war and was proud of that fact.....

You've just blown your credibility with me, come on, do really have to
resort to name calling???

>
>Besides like is Bush in the loop or out of the loop?  Bush said we
>were coming out of the recession in 1991....We didn't so he kept 
>telling us why it looked like we were in one.  He would never
>admit to it.....They are both politicians.....
>

But that's no excuse for Clinton, 2 wrongs make a right???? I don't think so.


>>
>>His dishonesty is the MAIN reason I didn't vote for him. 
>
>And Bush's proven record of dishonesty was why I didn't vote for
>him.....

Proven record??? Back up your allegations with fact!
Walsh has spent millions are come with nothing....



>If he does well
>>in his first term, I'll probably support him for another.
>>
>
>Well for the countries sake I hope he and Congress both do well.
>
>
>
>>>
>>>Bil Snodgrass III
>>
>>-----------------------------------------



________________________________________________

J.R. Ordon
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh