From: mjln_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Mikeey Jean Lin)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: THE IMPLICATIONS OF ABORTION ON OUR SOCIETY
Date: 16 Apr 92 21:17:26 GMT
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <JBATES.92Apr16105047@pinocchio.pinocchio.encore.com> 
 jbates@pinocchio.encore.com (John Bates) writes:

>In article <1992Apr16.001852.10637@pony.Ingres.COM> 
 dan@Ingres.COM (1 Min. Mgr 1aB) writes:

>>Scientists have developed strong enough equipment to know that brain wave
>>activity begins around or before the time an abortion can be performed.  

>	So what? What is the significance of brain wave activity?

	It means perhaps the fetus can think and feel pain. Maybe the fetus
is indeed a living being. Maybe, just maybe we could be wrong about abortions. 
Daniel was implying that abortions might be the termination of life. If you
would just listen to his suggestions maybe you might learn something. 


>>Folks, it's time to start being honest.  Sin is sin for a reason and the 
>>longer we make a mockery of what is good and  right--the longer we remain 
>>proud stupid liars and remain in our sin, the more work we will do in 
>>proving that a loving God may have little choice other than to send some 
>>to the endless fire of hell.

>	The following message is rot-13'd since it is probably quite
>offensive to the various and sundry assorted Christians out there, and I
>don't mean it personally to anyone except Dan:

>	Shpx lbh naq lbhe fnqvfgvp, ohyyfuvg eryvtvba. 

	Real mature here John. It's sad knowing some people can only 
respond with obscene messages. Learn some manners, you might be a better
person for it. By the way, why did you make the comment to Dan? Was it
because you felt like being nasty or is it because his comment came close 
to the truth for you? Either way, your message will insult many Christians.
  

>	Aaahhh, I feel much better now. Dan, I've got an idea. Why don't you
>post your message over to alt.atheism, alt.pagan, talk.religion.newage, or
>alt.satan. I'm sure they'd be absolutely *thrilled* to hear your opinions,
>and maybe you'll convince them what fools they've all been. Maybe they'll
>admit that they've been "proud stupid liars" and start believing in your
>"loving God". Maybe they'll be frightened by your "fire of hell". I'm sure
>you'll impress them all with your honesty.

	Hmmm... I have a idea. Why don't YOU post your message in those
newsgroup. Oh I forgot, you only wanted to insult Dan, right? He's got
the courage to state his beliefs firmly. Do you? I have more respect for
someone who isn't afraid to speak his mind than someone who post obscene
messages as a response denoucing a person's religion.

>>Come on and flame and mock if you wish.  I just don't care.  I hope the point
>>has been made.

>	What point was that? That Christians can get carried away with their
>own self-righteousness? Yes, that point has been made.

	Like I said before. Try taking this comment to the newsgroup
you suggested. I curious to how some Christians would respond to your
(lack of) reasoning. You never know what responses you might get...
 

>>     Dan

>John

*****************************************************************************
*			    *              +------------------------------+ *
*     Brought to You by     *   (lllllll)  |       Hello, my name is 	  | *
*			    *   ll ~ ~ ll  |        Inigo Montoya	  | *
*      Mikeey Jean Lin      *   (  0 0  )  |			          | *
*       Vice President      *    |  ^  |   |	You killed my father.	  | *
*      Gymnastics Club      *     \_-_/l   |      PREPARE TO DIE!!!       | * 
*  University of Rochester  *  	      ll   +------------------------------+ * 
*			    *          l		                    *
*****************************************************************************
* This Week's Quote : Sex is not the answer, sex is the question            *
*		      "Yes" is the answer.		          Swami X   *
*****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame