HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cs6t+@andrew.cmu.edu (Calvin D. Swartzentruber)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: What else--the EAGLES
Date: 6 Oct 92 05:06:52 GMT
Organization: Freshman, CIT general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

I realize that in the next day or two rsfp will probably be filled with
various comments about the EAGLES - DALLAS game, but there is something
great about being one of the first (I wrote this at 12:42 AM EDT, and
there were no messages yet) to put my two cents in.

First, I must say, the game was definitely worth all the hype.  Some
damn good football was played!  I feel the need to even give Dallas some
credit -- Aikman made some nice passes, and they did really well in
holding on to the ball, at least the first half (I am not being
sarcastic).  Let's get to the real point though -- the Eagles are
rockin'!!!  I bear no deep grudges against Dallas, except that they kept
them from the playoffs last year, and they are probably my second
favourite team.  I am just happy that they were able to prove
definitively that they are very much a team to be reckoned with.  Now I
am not so stupid as to make some dumb ass comments about them going
16-0, or predicting that they will win the Show, but I hope this will
silence a few critics who have never really given the Eagles their due. 
Offensive wise, this was not even one of their best games -- good, but
not excellent.  Their D was just playing some damn fine ball, and with
Randall at the helm they were a little more able to capitalize on the
opportunities given them.  Also, I had a very strong sense of poetic
justice of Dallas being beaten offensive wise a lot because of Hershel. 
I guess he just never found the right team : -)

If you are still reading, and not an Eagles fan, you might as well leave
this entry now.  Eagles fans are welcome to make comments to what I say
here.      Credit for the victory:
1.Offensive line:  they have improved exponentially since last year -
way to    go.
2.Defensive line:  some would probably say they should go first, but I
like     single out parts less recognize.  Simmons and Reggie got some
great sacks,    Gang Green in general played excellent, those Ints were
sweet.
3.Hershel Walker:  he keeps going, and going, and ...
4.Cunningham, Byars, Barnett, Williams (in no particular order):  no    
       explanation necessary, except what an offense!!!!!
5.Feagles:  did you see some of those punts?  This guy is incredible,
and       some of those punts were off extremely bad snaps.
6.Seth Joyner:  play coming off an injury
7.anyone else I missed -- I can't get everyone.  I missed the first half
of     game, so if any player made an incredible play in the first half,
I did not   see it.

Go EAGLES!!!!!!!!!!!!
(a loyal fan in Pittsburgh)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jgmst5+@pitt.edu (Jarrod   G Miller)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Steelers in the News
Date: 3 Oct 92 13:08:58 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <1992Oct2.144620.19174@unlinfo.unl.edu> pdietz@cse.unl.edu (Phillip Dietz) writes:
>htilney@vax.clarku.edu writes:
>If they build a new stadioum it out to have a roof/dome.  This will tempt
>the SuperBowl committee's and raise mega-bux during the Superbowls.
Well, our mayor Sophie Masloff tried earlier this year to get 'Clemente Field'
built right by the stadium. (Stadium would have had grass btw)
That idea didn't last very long, as people saw how much it would have cost,
plus the fact that TRS is only 22 years old.

>Actually I'd rather see Pitt. start a pro Basketball team rather than see a 
>new (and not needed) stadium.  Then Pitt. could win every major sport 
>(except rugby of course :-)
Sorry. Pittsburgh hasn't, will not, and won't every support a basketball team
here.  As seen by the Pittsburgh Condors of the ABA and currently the college
teams, basketball isn't a Pittsburgh thing.  A game with violence (hockey
and football), now we're talking!

-jarrod

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: john@makesys.com (John Turman)
Subject: Re: Eagles 16-0? (was EAGLES WILL GO 16-0 IF ANYONE DOES)
Followup-To: <1992Sep30.191643.12032@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>
Organization: Make Systems, Inc.
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 14:53:39 GMT


>THE EAGLES ARE THE BEST TEAM IN THE NFL BY FAR AND WILL GO 16-0 AND WIN THE
>SUPERBOWL AND THE SCORE MON WILL BE AS FOLLOWS:

>                                EAGLES 42
>                                COWPUSSIES 3

Who is this moronic idiot? He doesn't even realize that the Cowboys and Eagles
can't play each other in the Super Bowl because they're in the same conference.

Get a clue asshole, learn about the NFL before you post this stupid drivel. And
BTW you don't have to hear we can shout you.

This guy appears to have an IQ equal to the total score of his SB prediction.

John T.
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you take yourself too seriously, you'll be the only one who does.

..John "Dolphinatic" Turman...
From: schmke@cco.caltech.edu (Kevin Todd Schmidt)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Schmidt Computer Rankings through 29-Sep-92
Date: 29 Sep 1992 20:32:00 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Distribution: na
NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu

Here are my computer rankings through 29-Sep-92.

Buffalo stays at #1 with the 49er's, Eagles and Cowboys close behind.

I was a dismal 5-6 against the spread this week for a season total of
29-22-1.

I welcome comments and suggestions.

Kevin

															 Schedule
Rank Team                      Points  Record Strength  Last Week    Change
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1    Buffalo                   84.643   4-0-0  68.348  (  1,  86.607)  +0
2    San_Francisco             83.552   3-1-0  75.927  (  2,  84.760)  +0
3    Philadelphia              82.385   3-0-0  71.739  (  3,  81.671)  +0
4    Dallas                    80.521   3-0-0  72.677  (  5,  80.108)  +1
5    Tampa_Bay                 79.475   3-1-0  72.654  ( 10,  73.047)  +5
6    New_Orleans               79.227   2-2-0  75.925  (  4,  80.831)  -2
7    Minnesota                 76.541   3-1-0  72.374  ( 16,  68.277)  +9
8    Detroit                   75.049   1-3-0  74.788  ( 12,  72.865)  +4
9    NY_Giants                 74.805   1-2-0  77.863  (  9,  74.657)  +0
10   Washington                73.622   2-1-0  74.606  (  8,  74.767)  -2
11   Houston                   73.476   3-1-0  67.823  (  7,  75.092)  -4
12   Pittsburgh                72.874   3-1-0  66.827  (  6,  79.623)  -6
13   Kansas_City               72.686   3-1-0  63.186  ( 11,  72.926)  -2
14   Miami                     69.850   3-0-0  62.684  ( 14,  71.781)  +0
15   Phoenix                   69.604   0-3-0  80.794  ( 19,  67.104)  +4
16   Chicago                   69.514   2-2-0  74.332  ( 17,  68.085)  +1
17   Green_Bay                 69.422   2-2-0  73.610  ( 26,  61.221)  +9
18   Atlanta                   68.248   1-3-0  71.849  ( 13,  72.482)  -5
19   Denver                    66.385   3-1-0  66.116  ( 21,  66.185)  +2
20   Indianapolis              66.353   1-2-0  73.584  ( 18,  67.758)  -2
21   LA_Rams                   65.597   2-2-0  69.354  ( 23,  64.179)  +2
22   Cincinnati                65.551   2-2-0  66.462  ( 20,  66.378)  -2
23   NY_Jets                   65.031   0-4-0  72.568  ( 15,  70.610)  -8
24   Cleveland                 62.633   1-3-0  65.663  ( 22,  65.872)  -2
25   LA_Raiders                60.065   0-4-0  66.814  ( 25,  62.375)  +0
26   Seattle                   59.821   1-3-0  66.495  ( 27,  57.523)  +1
27   San_Diego                 59.380   0-4-0  71.355  ( 24,  62.910)  -3
28   New_England               57.892   0-3-0  70.020  ( 28,  53.805)  +0
-- 
Jet Propulsion Laboratory | schmke@cco.caltech.edu
4800 Oak Grove Dr.        | schmidt@spc5.jpl.nasa.gov
M/S 525-3684              |
Pasadena, CA  91109       |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dangerous Dan
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Date: 30 Sep 92 02:51:50 MST
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

In article <1992Sep29.182023.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu>, cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>In article <1992Sep29.191048.22289@dragon.acadiau.ca>, 890554h@dragon.acadiau.ca (Andrew Hoogerwerf) writes:
>> Although I am Canadian and have watch Warren Moon play for the Eskimos
>> there is no doubt in my mind that Dan Marino is by far the premiere
>> QB in NFL no matter how many records Moon will break.
> 
>     I have to agree. In my biased opinion Dan is one of the two best
> quarterbacks to ever play the game. The other? Some guy out west.

Yeah, I don't think I'll ever forget that 41-38 OT game against Miami
10 or 11 years ago.  Fouts was simply amazing.  He WAS the Chargers.
Glad to see that someone remembers him....
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
From: TOM@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Marinovich and the Raiders
Date: 2 Oct 92 20:34:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: SLACVM.92276.123400TOM
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Dear ol Dan on Monday Night said it best, "Todd should be a senior at USC!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: c1h3384@rigel.tamu.edu
Subject: Re: <None>
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 04:45:00 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.212447.1@wharton.upenn.edu>, reille85@wharton.upenn.edu writes...
>The Eagles did not play very well offensively and still scored 31 pts. on MNF,
>all I have to say is watch out NFL.  By the way, the Eagles will also win on
>November 1 in Dallas.
> 

Remember, 1) They can NOT play better offensively. That is it. Take out
             their QB's run, what do you have? Does Cunningham know how to
             hit a reciever in game time?

          2) You are going to lose a bunch of games this year. The first one
             should be in KC. KC is going to beat you really bad.

	  3) Coming in November, the two teams are going in opposite directions.
             Dallas is young, and always goes up. You guys are too old to make
             a run that time. So Dallas is going to pay you back then. 

Bob
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bsricker@eos.ncsu.edu (BRIAN SCOTT RICKER)
Subject: Endless arguments
Originator: bsricker@c00471-224wi.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: bsricker@eos.ncsu.edu (BRIAN SCOTT RICKER)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 15:09:26 GMT


Just to clarify a few of these endless arguments ...

   The Dolphins WILL beat the Bills ( On a Stoyanvicch 50+ yard field go )
   The Cowboys WILL beat the Eagles ( 100+ yard game for Emmit and 2 TD's from
                                      Aikman to Irvin )

Rationale:
	Everyteam with a strong link to Miami will win this weekend.  
        Miami is obviously from Miami.  Dallas has simply turned into the
        Hurricane Alumni club.  And yes ( I realize this should be in the
        college forum). The Canes will beat Fla. St. 



Cheers,
Brian

P.S. I live in Raleigh NC not Miami Fla
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ahn@pop.cis.yale.edu (Eugene R. Ahn)
Subject: Re: Can MIAMI  go undefeated again? was: Can Bills go 16-0?
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Yale University
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 23:57:52 GMT

In article <1992Oct4.213259.5571@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM
(John P. Gloria) wrote:
> 
> In article <1992Oct4.210347.28947@cass.ma02.bull.com> silverio@cass.ma02.bull.com (Brian Silverio) writes:
> >After watching Miami take Buffalo apart, the question is:
> >
> >Can anyone beat Miami?

> I don't think there is any team that can go undefeated.
> anymore. The Dolphins were certainly better today and
> if the Dolphins keeps their heads on straight, then
> they have a chance of winning more games.
> 

Now there's a daring prediction! :-) 
Well, as far as "I don't think there is any team that can go undefeated":

Any team can go 16-0, as long as they're still undefeated!
4-0! And two games left against New England! Woo Woo! :-)

And it would be something, wouldn't it, considering the schedule for the
Dolphins. Well, if they play this well against the better teams, then send
em over!!!

--
Eugene "Mos Eisley" Ahn     ahn@suncis.cis.yale.edu
"What did you think of that reply?"
"No sir. I don't like it."
From: collins@gdwest.gd.com (Gary J. Collins)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Ten best rated QB performances ever
Date: 6 Oct 92 21:51:08 GMT
Organization: General Dynamics Corp.

In article <1992Oct3.000746.28843@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> Michael.P.Colburn@dartmouth.edu (Michael P. Colburn) writes:
>
>  Well, I don't have my NFL stat book handy, but surely every Giant fan
>(and probably most Bronco fans) remember Phil Simms' monster
>performance in the '86 Superbowl.  If memory serves me right, he
>completed all but 3 passes out of 25 attempts for nearly 300 yards!  I
>have no idea what his QB rating was for that game, but I'm sure it's
>got to be one of the best (if not the best) in any playoff/championship
>game and should have a high enough rating to be listed in the top 10
>best performances ever.  Go Gia's!!!
>
        Jeez.  All that hoopla over a mildly exceptional
	performance.  It, however, does not compare to Doug
	Williams performance in '88.  Monster yards.  Monster.

	And, no.  I'm not a Redskin fan.  In fact, I despise the
	East; NFC, that is.

	Simms' game is not that notable to warrant best or one
	of the best ever in any playoff/championship game.
	Puleeeeezzzzz.
	
	Gary John

	uh ummm.  Geaux Saints.


		
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Floyd Goodrich)
Subject: Re: Ten best rated QB performances ever
Organization: Motorola Inc., Austin Tx.
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 14:57:52 GMT

Robert Newby writes:
>I don't remember the exact date but after trailing the '49ers all game long
>Roger Staubach ran them into the ground to advance in the playoffs in about
>1971 or '72, maybe '73.  I don't know his stats for that game but, in
>Candlestick Park, he turned them everyway but 'loose.  It was a part of
>that "America's Team" mystique which I cannot stand.  Can anyone fill in the
>blanks?  Bob

I think it was in '72 but I'm not sure.  It seems like Dallas was down 28-9
with about 6 minutes left.  Staubach led Dallas to score 3 TDs (aided by
at least 1 and maybe 2 on-side kicks) and win 30-28.  The game was in San 
Francisco.  The memory is fading as time goes by, but as a kid I still
remember being absolutely amazed it was REALLY happening.


Floyd Goodrich
floydg@oakhill.sps.mot.com
From: seth@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (peter.r.clark..jr)
Subject: Re: Dallas at Philly
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 20:15:49 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.185158.24929@kronos.arc.nasa.gov>, blah@maas-neotek.arc.nasa.gov (TWF) writes:
> Well, Dallas was beaten badly - more badly that I had really expected.
> Still, the game was closer than the score would indicate.  Some
> observations:
> 
> - the Philly defense (if they play like they did last night) could
> beat anyone, with the possible exception of a Washington or Miami.  I
> wasn't too impressed with their safety play (though their cornerbacks
> are much better than last year).  My point is the only team with a
> chance to beat them would be one that could get receivers behind their
> secondary and get them the ball.  Of course, Dallas will have figured
> this out come November (I hope).

Had to respond to this one. CB Izel Jenkins is the #3 CB behind Ben Smith
who is still out with a knee injury, may miss the whole season. Before the
injury Smith and Allen were arguably the best CB tandem in the league.
To say that they are better with Izel "Toast" Jenkins in place of Smith
is absolutely untrue. If anything, Izel is the weakest link in this defense.
This is not a knock on Izel, I still think he's better than he gets credit
for, but he's NO Ben Smith. At safety position, Wes Hopkins is out with a
muscle pull, and I don't recall Rich Miano's name being mentioned, so that
means the #4 guy in the depth chart, John Booty, was in there. Booty came
up with the first INT. Andre Waters, like him or not, plays his position
as well as anybody. And the talk of cheap shots is all gone. He hits people
hard, no question, but he hits them clean. If he was on the team you liked,
you'd love the guy. On the rare occasion that Smith broke through the line,
Andre was right there to crush him. When Novacek had a ball thrown in his
direction, Andre was there to pound him. And most times that a reciever
got a ball, Andre was there too. Watch the game again, Andre will be
sighted more times than Elvis. And he **NAILS** people (in my best Berman
imitation).

> - Philly is definitely going to miss Mr. Jackson before it's all over
> with.

Don't bet on it. He became nothing more than a distraction, and they are
a better team for having that behind him. Mike Golic was asked about that
this morning on the new morning sports talk show in Philly (WMMR, for
the locals, changed their format to Rock-Sports this week with Howard
Eskin and John DeBella) and basically what I got from what he said was
that the team was better off for not having to worry about Jackson any
more.

> Mark

pete clark jr
From: aperkins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Aaron B. Perkins)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: ONE QUESTION!!!!!!!!
Date: 2 Oct 92 18:13:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: ringer.1992Oct2.181338.19436
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio


ONE QUESTION: OUT OF THE 5 TIMES ACHYMAN HAS PLAYED AGAINST THE MIGHTY EAGLES
HOW MANY TIMES HAS ACHYMAN WON????????
ALSO..... IN THE LAST GAME THE EAGLES PLAYED AT TEXAS STADIUM HOW MANY TIMES
DID THE MIGHTY EAGLES DEFENCE SACK ACHYMAN????????






ANSWERS LATER TO COME UNLESS SOME COWPUSSIES FANS CAN TELL ME??????
(IT WILL TELL YOU THE OUTCOME TO THE GAME MON. NIGHT)





JULIUS,BARKLEY,CUNNUNGHAM,DYKSTRA,BOL,HAWKINS,BARNETT,WALKER......WHATS MORE

TO SAY THEIR THE BEST!!!!!!!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Jonathan_B_Bellack@yccatsmtp.ycc.yale.edu (Jonathan Bellack)
Subject: Eagles Note (Re: Current standings, week #5)
Organization: Yale University
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 22:06:51 GMT


> Name                  W  L  T   Pct  Pf  Pa Home   Away   AFC    NFC    Div
> Philadelphia Eagles   4  0  0 1.000 107  34 3-0    1-0    1-0    3-0    2-0    
                                      ^^^^^^^

Among teams that have only played 4 games, only Miami has more PF, w/109.
Even including all teams, this is the 9th-highest PF, incl. the Bears w/108 and
(again) Miami w/109.
This is the lowest PA in the NFL right now, the closest being the Saints w/51.
The Steelers & Oilers are the only other teams below 50, w/57 & 59 respectively.
Again, though, these 3 teams have played 5 games vs. the Eagles' 4.

The upshot: No team could more than triple its opponents' output purely on
defense.  And this is without Keith Jackson, even.


              --JonB

Eagles-Steelers Superbowl? I only wish!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: walker@eplrx7.es.duPont.com (Scott Walker)
Subject: Re: Jackson a dolphin?
Organization: DuPont Central Research & Development
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 13:18:56 GMT

In article <BvC4rw.qr@acsu.buffalo.edu> v069qqqc@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Mike C.) writes:
>In article <BvC26q.Mzv@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (JONNY B. GOODE) writes...
>> 
>>	Keith Jackson won't be able to play for at least 3 weeks.  So much 
>>for that.
>
>Why not? Is it because he doesn't know the system? If so, I think it's
>a stupid move. The guy is an all-pro... teach him a few plays and 
>throw him in there, even if it's just to throw off the Bills' already
>confused secondary.
>
>But with or without Jackson it'll be a great game. I can't wait.
>
>Mike

I heard on the news this morning that Jackson is expected to suit up for
Sunday's game against the Bills.  I know I would stick him in - he 
certainly can't hurt you.
Also, he signed with the Dolphins for 4 years for $6 million.
On the local news last night, they did an interview with Mike Golic of the
Eagles, and he said that while the team would be sorry to see Jackson leave,
the fact that he won his court case and the free-agency thing is 
encouraging to the other players.
Without mentioning the fact that Jackson will be "another weapon in Dan
Marino's arsenal" (if I hear that phrase one more time...), I think he
will really contribute to the Fins, especially since they are a 
passing team on most counts anyway.  Things are shaping up!  This week should
be a great test.

Scott

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: daled@meaddata.com (Dale Drummond)
Subject: Bengal notes
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 20:05:44 GMT
Distribution: usa

Reggie Rembert was put on the injured/non-football illness list due to
an NFL mandate to put him in a residency program for his alcohol dependence.
The Bengals picked up wide receiver Jeff Query, formerly of Green Bay and
most recently of Houston.

Kevin Walker suffered what David Shula called a "career-ending injury" to
his knee Sunday.  This hurts the linebacker squad already depleted by the
loss of Ray Bentley for the season.

DBs Mitchell Price and David Fulcher will begin practicing with the team
this week.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dale Drummond          		"This calls for my projectile raisin breath!"	
daled@meaddata.com		
...!uunet!meaddata!daled		-- Powdered Toast Man
From: v069qqqc@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Mike C.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Jackson a dolphin?
Date: 28 Sep 92 23:16:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Just heard on ESPN that Miami plans to announce the signing of 
Keith Jackson tomorrow.

This adds a whole new dimension to the Dolphins-Bills game...
Marino now has a brand new weapon to tear up the Bills secondary
with.

Prediction:

    last team to have the ball  70
2nd last team to have the ball  63

Mike C.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: curt@oce.orst.edu (Curt Vandetta)
Subject: Re: Dolphins vs Seahawks observations
Organization: Oregon State University, College of Oceanography
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 21:52:31 GMT

In article <2487@ceylon.gte.com> chf0@harvey.gte.com (Curtis Fennell) writes:
>
>Ordinarily, Dan Marino is not considered to be "tough", but after
>getting a concussion in the fourth quarter, he came back and threw the
>game-winning pass to Fred Banks.  Otherwise, the 'phins were pretty
>quiet on offense.
 
   A local TV station reported that Dan did not remember any of the game
   after the Rofus Porter hit, including the game winning TD!

   That's what legends are made of...

>--
>Curt "I always pick the Dolphins - even against Buffalo!"  Fennell
>			DOLFAN in New England.             
>'72 Dolphins - The perfect team in the perfect season - 17-0


   Curt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Curt Vandetta				College of Oceanography
  curt@oce.orst.edu			Oregon State University

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
  "Well, as I alway say, 'case-a-rum, case-a-rum'"
					-Kelly Bundy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------