HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: raza@engrg.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed)
Subject: Re: Javed's attitute and a question.
Organization: DA&MRL, Engineering, UWO, London Ont. CA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 22:09:45 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.192950.13908@cc.gatech.edu>, pkohli@cc.gatech.edu (Prince Kohli) writes:
|> In article <1993Jan21.180619.3131@julian.uwo.ca>, raza@engrg.uwo.ca (Mr. Raza Syed) writes:
|> |> In article <1993Jan19.063117.6718@latcs1.lat.oz.au>, robert@latcs1.lat.oz.au (Robert Van Doorn) writes:
|> |> |> In article <1993Jan18.181913.25824@cc.gatech.edu> pkohli@cc.gatech.edu (Prince Kohli) writes:
|> |> |> >
|> |> |> >It's definitely not out. Something similar happened recently in RSA,
|> |> |> >when Manjrekar hit a ball hard onto the short leg's helmet - the ball
|> |> |> >then looped up and the fielder claimed a catch, which the umpire upheld.
|> |> |> >Manjrekar protested and the umpire declared him not out. Something
|> |> |> >like this had apparently also happened in B'bay before.
|> |> |> >
|> |> |> About 9 or 10 years ago here in Australia we had a situation in a test match 
|> |> |> where the batsman bottom edged a cut shot onto the keepers boot (he was up 
|> |> |> to the stumps for the spinner), the ball popped up and first slip took the 
|> |> |> catch. The umpire judged this as out. How is this different from hitting the 
|> |> |> ball into short leg's helmet and another fieldsman completing the catch???
|> |> |> 
|> |> |> Rob, AAITP. 
|> |> 
|> |> I think if the ball rebounds from the helmet and someone completes
|> |> the catch, then the batsman is out. But if it got stuck in the Helmet
|> |> then five runs will be awarded to the batsman.
|> 
|> Well, I recounted the incident about Manjrekar above and I realize that
|> I should have worded it differently. As a matter of fact, the shortleg
|> himself was the one who caught the ball as it bounced off his helmet.
|> Also, the commentator was pretty sure that it was a not out.

No! you dont have to write it differently, i did'nt read the first paragraph before
writing (oops!) sorry for that, and thanks for clearing this thing up.
Now my question is that, is this a new law? ( imean considering of halmet and
e.g., shoes differently) or this was always the case?


|> 
|> Cheers,
|> 
|> -Prince
|> -- 
|> pkohli@cc.gatech.edu      | "What's so unpleasant about getting drunk?" 
|> Distributed Systems Group,| "Ask a glass of water."   Hitchhikers'....
|> College of Computing, Georgia Tech.

-- 

S.R.Raza.
raza@surya.engrg.uwo.ca

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: atulthombre@hgrd01.enet.dec.com (The Solitary Reaper)
Subject: Re: The best ever 1 day XIs
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 17:17:50 GMT


In article <1993Jan26.233452.14375@nmsu.edu>, sbasu@huey (BASU) writes...
> 
>Following the tumultous responses I've been receiving to my best ever test  
>XIs, I've decided to compile my best ever 1 day XIs.
> 
>One point to note. Cricketers who came in before the concept of limited  
>overs matches was introduced have not been considered in the squads below.  
>So, for instance, though I'd like to include Sir Don Bradman or Sir Gary  
>Sobers in their teams, I haven't. & don't grill me on this; the  
>speculation of what they might have done in such cricket is left to you.
>Also, some test greats were left out as I didn't consider them suitable  
>for 1 day cricket, like Geoff Boycott . Also, if a team won the world cup  
>on any occasion, or did remarkably well like NZ last time, the stars of  
>that performance were given prominent consideration. Performances in Kerry  
>Packer's WSC were considered, while some 1 day moves, like having Ian  
>Botham open the batting, were implemented.And yes: all the line-ups below  
>are in batting order.
> 
>============================
> 
>INDIA
>-----
>Sunil Gavaskar (c)
	SMG as captain. No way!! He never was an attacking captain. He always
	used to play safe. This attitude is not suited for ODI. Here we need a
	captain who is ready to take chances. I personally would prefer Kapil
	for that job.
>Syed Kirmani (k)
	Two slow players as openers would put pressure on the middle order.
	Kiri was a fighter never a striker. His place is justified only because
	of his keeping and fighting spirit (which may be helpful in the event
	of an early collapse)
>Jimmy Amarnath (d)
	He deserves a place in the team but not as a deputy. Venkat is
	prefered.
>Md Azharuddin
	No arguments!!
>Dilip Vengsarkar
	Personally I would prefer Yashpal. A great fielder. Good runner between
	the wicket (very rare nowadays :-(). 
>Sandip Patil
>Manoj Prabhakar
>Kapil Dev 
	No arguments!!
>Bishen Singh Bedi
	He was never a ODI bowler. His style is suited for tests (flighting the
	ball etc).
>S Venkataraghavan
	In the team for his ability as bowler and fielder. Can be Vice-captain.
>Maninder Singh
	Deserves the place only because there is no other bowler who has proved
himself in the ODI. Manindar has potential, but I don't know his statistics in
ODI to be selected in the all time greats.
> 

	So my team is -
K. Srikanth
Sunil Gavaskar
M. Azzaruddin
Sandeep Patil
Yashpal Sharma
Jimmy Amarnath
Kapildev (c)
M. Prabhakar
S. Kirmani (Keeper)
Venkatraghavan (vc)
Manindar Singh

Notable ommisions : D. B. Vengasarkar, Ravi Shastri 
	The batting order can not be fixed as it can change during the match.

Atul. 

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: sdatta@eng.clemson.edu (Sandip Datta)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: disastrous debuts
Date: 26 Jan 93 22:58:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: hubcap.1993Jan26.225821.12443
Reply-To: sdatta@eng.clemson.edu
Distribution: na
Organization: College of Engineering, Clemson Univ.

In article 20361@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu, pramasun@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Padmanabhan Ramasundaram) writes:
>
>
>            Srikkanth made 0 and 13 in his debut. The way he got out in the 
>second innings was rather comical.  (He strolled out of his crease and was run 
>out!).  I suppose he can be called reasonably successful , at least in one 
>dayers.
>
>            Vishwanath also made 0 in his debut innings.
>
>Paddu.



 What about 137 in the second innings? That is also a part of the debut test. Never mind he was bowled first ball in the first innings.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Dream Team of 80's
From: WEABEP@DEVAX1 (Peter ABELA)
Date: 25 Jan 93 17:04:03 +1000
Distribution: world
Organization: BHP Information Technology
Nntp-Posting-User: weabep
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.11

In <1jo5crINN51n@sunaus.Aus.Sun.COM> peterm@pinhigh.Aus.Sun.COM writes:

> My dream team of the 80's is as follows -
> 
> 		Dream Team I		Dream Team II
> 		===========		===========
> 	
> 	1.	Sunil Gavaskar(Ind)	Gordon Greenidge(WI)
> 	2.	David Boon(Aus)	Geoff Marsh(Aus)
> 	3.	Greg Chappell(Aus)	David Gower(Eng)
> 	4.	Viv Richards (c)	(WI)	Aravinda Da Silva(Sri)
> 	5.	Javed Mianded(Pak)	Martin Crowe(NZ)
> 	6.	Imran Khan(Pak)	Alan Border (c)(Aus)
> 	7.	Rod Marsh (vc)(Aus)	Jeff Dujon(WI)
> 	8.	Richard Hadlee	(NZ)	Kapil Dev(Ind)
> 	9.	Michael Holding(WI)	Malcolm Marshall(WI)
> 	10.	Dennis Lillee(Aus)	Abdul Qadir(Pak)
> 	11.	John Emburey(Eng)	Joel Garner(WI)
> 	
Both the sides are pretty reasonable (IMHO). I take exception to two players.
Firstly, and most notably, Geoff Marsh. The man has a test average of 35.
Between 1987 and getting dropped in 1992, he only scored 1 (that's one) test
century, and that was (only !!! :-) ) against England on the '89 Ashes tour.
That was the day him and Taylor batted through the first day without losing a
wicket. Overall he only scored 4 centuries in 49 tests. Surely Gooch, Haynes,
Mohsin, Mudussar, etc would be better than Geoff Marsh.

I'm also not all that enthusiastic about Emburey. If a batsman gets after him,
he usually throws in the towel. I'd have Qadir in the first team, and maybe
Bracewell, who is very competitive, in the second. Alternatively, Bruce Yardley
had a very good test record, and he was still playing in the eighties.



The Speaker.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------/\/\----
Peter Abela, Computing Science Cadet, Process & Engineering Section   / / /\
               BHP Information Technology, Wollongong Region         / / /  \
Mail      :    P.O. Box 261, Warrawong 2502, NSW, Australia         / / / /\ \
Telephone :    +61 42 755625 Fax: +61 42 755215                     \ \/ / / /
Internet  :    Peter.P.A.ABELA@BHPMELMSM.BHP.bhpmel04.telememo.au    \  / / /
----------------------------------------------------------------------\/\/\/---
All opinions are my own, and not BHP IT's
===============================================================================
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 16:21:35 EST
From: Spaceman Spiff <SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: QUESTION ABOUT GAVASKAR
 <93021.000032SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu>
 <Jan.22.17.52.08.1993.20500@maya.rutgers.edu>
 <93023.092802SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu>

In article <93023.092802SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu>, Spaceman Spiff
<SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu> says:
>
>>
>>> srikkanth hit 4 successive balls for 6,6,6 and 4 off bob holland in 85-86.
>>
>ferpectly correct. it was 044446. i remembered the 22 runs in the over but I
>wasn't sure whether it was 3 sixes and a four or 4 sixes and a six. i guessed
>wrong.
>
correction, it was 4,6,4,4,4,0 in the over.

Stay cool,
Spaceman Spiff

Non illegitimati carborundum          Don't let the bastards get you down
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: tripunit@algol.cs.psu.edu (Mahesh V Tripunitara)
Subject: And YASF (Yet Another Shastri Flame)(tm)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 03:08:29 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.013838.19412@cs.sfu.ca> aamir@cs.sfu.ca (Aamir Husain) writes:

>on a lighter note, even shastri has a better record than prabhakar plus 

No need to be light about it. Prabhakar should be ashamed of himself.

Mahesh.
-- 
Ask not what the system can do for you, but what it can do it to.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: kre@cs.mu.oz.au (Robert Elz)
Subject: Re: Lowest individual score NEVER made !
Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 16:49:34 GMT

In <Jan.21.17.16.55.1993.23470@pepper.rutgers.edu>
bmohan@pepper.rutgers.edu (bulusu mohan) writes:

| What is the lowest individual score in a test innings NEVER made by 
| any batsman ?

That was a quiz question on ABC radio sometime earlier in the year
(or season, or something).

| Obviously, the answer is no more than 366. In fact, I feel sure it
| is less than 200. But, I'd be very surprised if it is less than 50.

Its certainly more than 100, and I think a lot more, though I
don't remember the answer.  Under 200 probably.

kreee
From: bibhas@pico.engr.mun.ca (Bibhas Bhattacharya)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Some points...
Date: 28 Jan 93 15:33:24 GMT
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland

Recently I am trying to get myself up to date with the cricketing events.
These points came out of that...

	1. The articles on India Today are the most useless ones. They 
	never give any technical details of the matches (not even the
	scores), but, simply criticize the Indian team in a most
	offensive and cynical manner. I don't think the guy who writes
	them has ever played anything seriously in his life.

	2. I want to know the last five years win-lose-draw statistics for
	all the test match playing countries. I will be thankful if anyone can
	can lead me to that. The stats doesn't have to be for last five years.

	3. Is there any FAQ for this group, or, any ftp site carrying some solid
	reliable stats?

Thanks.
Bibhas.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Bibhas Bhattacharya        |Memorial University of Newfoundland
bibhas@pico.engr.mun.ca    |St. John's, Canada. A1B 3X5
From: shivanan@nyquist.usc.edu (Shivanand Bhajekar)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: The best ever Test XIs
Date: 25 Jan 93 04:58:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: nyquist.1k1k9vINN5aa
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: nyquist.usc.edu

In article <karnik.727914313@myria> karnik@cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik) writes:

>>> >Manoj Prabhakar
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> 	PLEASE, no way prabhakar makes it into an all time XI!!
>

>	How droll! How about Amar Singh? Or Nissar? Or Karsan Ghavri?

	There was a time when we had 4 (OR 3) specialist spinners in the team
	backed up by a medium pacer. Those were the times when we did faily
	successfully WI(71), ENG(71), WI(76), AUS(78) ETC..
	
	We can have the same kind of combination in an all time great India XI.
	With the medium pacer being Kapil in this case, it would be a good 
	team.

	Shivanand Bhajekar
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: bnataraj@uceng.uc.edu (Bhaskar Natarajan)
Subject: Re: India win 2nd One day in Chandigarh
Organization: University of Cincinnati
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 21:37:43 GMT

In article <1993Jan21.164028.19882@lut.ac.uk> eldip@lut.ac.uk (DI Patel) writes:

>without any Hick(!) ups.  Azzza was out LBW with 4 runs required.  Among the
>England bowlers I think DeFreitas (Daffy) was the pick of the lot.

>Among the bowlers I think Jarvis is going to do quite well for England and
>Tuffnel.  India will probably be hoping Kumble continues from where he left

	I'd look out for DeFreitas.. He's the one who has given Indian batsmen a
lotta trubble lotta times, Flashback 1987 WC semi-final....

Ciao,
Bhaskar { The Bearcats are on a roll !!! }
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: urajan@leland.Stanford.EDU (Uday Rajan)
Subject: England-India ODI - England 102/4 off 32 overs
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 06:49:21 GMT

In the 2nd ODI between England and India at Chandigarh, Azharuddin won the 
toss and put England in to bat. England at one stage were 49/4 (they lost
Gooch, Stewart, Gatting, and Fairbrother), but Smith (33*) and Hick (29*)
staged a recovery to 102/4 off 30 overs. Srinath took 2 wickets (1 with his 
first ball), Kapil 1 and Raju 1.
From: prakash@ecs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: 'Gavaskar the Great' - NOT !!
Date: 24 Jan 93 10:46:33 GMT

In article <1jpdptINNol8@nyquist.usc.edu>, shivanan@nyquist.usc.edu (Shivanand Bhajekar) writes:
> 	stuff deleted [...]
> 
>>Test !
>>	
>>	I'm still wondering to this day : What would Sunny have done if India
>>had not managed to collapse in the semis of the Reliance Cup and lose to 
>>England ? The final was to be played in Calcutta. 
>>	Any Sunny fans out there who can throw some light on this hypothetical?
> 
> 	Why do you think Gavaskar allowed himself to be bowled through the
> 	gate ( a good length ball) from DeFreitas at Bombay?
> 
> 	Just Kidding!
	^^^^^^^^^^^^


 	And I suppose he coaxed Azhar to try that paddle sweep and asked Kapil
to test Gatting's catching in the deep during one of those drinks breaks !! 


Cheers !

Guru Prakash


 
> 
> 	Shivanand Bhajekar
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: atulthombre@hgrd01.enet.dec.com (The Solitary Reaper)
Subject: Re: Indian Team for 1st Test
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:59:38 GMT


In article <6687@falcon.ukc.ac.uk>, rsp@ukc.ac.uk (R.S.Pickett) writes...
> 
>I've just heard the Indian team for the first test. Here it is:
> 
>Azharrudin   (capt.)
>Sidhu
>Raman
>Kambli
>Tendulkar
>Sharma
 ^^^^^^
	Is he Chetan Sharma OR Ajay Sharma ?
	Ajay Sharma is in good form recently, and scored well in the prilims.
Also Chetan hasn't done anything extra-ordinary to be included in the test
side. So probably it is Ajay Sharma. 
	It is sad to see Ankola dropped without playing in the ODI. 

> 
>Rob.

Atul.
From: j_graham@vger.nsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Aus team for 4th test, possible WI team
Date: 21 Jan 93 12:47:09 EDT

In article <geoffb.727517755@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU>, geoffb@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (G Berry) writes:
> rakesh@ecr.mu.oz.au (Rakesh DESAI) writes:
> 
>>In article <1993Jan19.004609.29152@ucc.su.OZ.AU>, mikef@dph1.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Blind Boy Grunt) writes: 
>>I also think Patterson will come back.  Why do ABC commentators call him
>>Rambo?


Bring back Patterson. Heaven forbid.
> 
> I don't know, perhaps because he's mean and ugly? :-) 
> 
>>You are right Simmons and Hooper should go.  I don't think they will
>>take such drastic step with Haynes.
> 

> 
> I don't know about the OD games, I rarely watch much of them. I did think
> that Border's captaincy in the 2nd Test was very good and that Richardson
> had relatively poor matches in Melbourne and Sydney (as a captain) after
> a very good start in Brisbane.

Of the West Indian test captains that I have seen, Sobers, Kanhai, LLoyd,
Richards and Haynes, Richie Richardson is by far the best when it comes
to on the field tactics. Lloyd, for all of his success had a total lack
of imagination and was far too quick to accuse his bowlers of not trying
whenever the opposition made 400. Lloyd however commanded respect unlike
Richardson who is 'too nice'. Sobers had imagination, but he also had an
unfailing belief in his ability to perform miracles.
> 
>>I guess Lara can open.  This guy can bat at any place, he is so good.
> 
> I guess he could, but I'd say Richardson would be the man in test matches.
> 
>>> So the West Indian team would be:
>>> Haynes, Richardson, Lara, Arthurton, Logie, Adams, Murray, Bishop, Ambrose,
>>> Walsh, Patterson, Hooper (12th).

Logie in our test team, never again. One day, maybe. Patterson, nope. If we
are going to try a fourth fast bowler, the it will be Benjamin.
> 
>>> This will be another close match, but I believe it is likely to be either a
>>> West Indian win or a draw.
> 
>>I would bet on a dull draw with another 20 wickets for 1200 runs.

The match will not draw unless there is rain. We are not going to leave
Australia with a 1- 0 defeat. 2,3 - 0 maybe. I have not seen the test team
which can score 400 runs when our fast bowlers are bowling at full trot.
In the last game Hooper bowled 45 overs, which will not happen in the next
test. We are going to go for broke. I prefer 3 fast bowlers and 7 batsmen.


Jonathan Graham (Bajan on the net)
Xref: sparky rec.sport.cricket.scores:312 rec.sport.cricket:19726
From: Vasanthan.Dasan@Central.SUn.COM
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores,rec.sport.cricket
Subject: West Indies vs Australia (4T4D - Adelaide, Australia, Jan 25)
Followup-To: rec.sport.cricket
Date: 27 Jan 1993 05:15:34 +1100
Organization: Mail/News gateway
Reply-To: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: munnari.oz.au

Final scoreboard in the fourth Test between Australia and West Indies
at Adelaide Oval on Tuesday:

West Indies 1st Innings 252

Australia 1st Innings 213

West Indies 2nd Innings 146

Australia 2nd Innings

   D.C. Boon lbw b Ambrose..................0
   M.A. Taylor c Murray b Benjamin..........7
   J.L. Langer c Murray b Bishop...........54
   M.E. Waugh c Hooper b Walsh.............26
   S.R. Waugh c Arthurton b Ambrose.........4
   A.R. Border c Haynes b Ambrose...........1
   I.A. Healy b Walsh.......................0
   M.G. Hughes lbw b Ambrose................1
   S.K. Warne lbw b Bishop..................9
   T.B.A. May not out......................42
   C.J. McDermott c Murray b Walsh.........18
   Extras (b1, lb8, nb13)..................22
   Total..................................184

   Fall: 1-5, 2-16, 3-54, 4-64, 5-72, 6-73, 7-74, 8-102, 9-144

   Bowling: Ambrose 26-5-46-4, Bishop 17-3-41-2, Benjamin 12-2-32-1, 
            Walsh 19-4-44-3, Hooper 5-1-12-0

   Overs: 79

   West Indies won by 1 run

   Man of the Match: Curtly Ambrose (West Indies)

   The series tied at 1-1

   Jan 30-Feb 3 Australia v West Indies, fifth Test (Perth).

===
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
content-length: 2540
Approved-By:  "Vasanthan S. Dasan" <Vasanthan.Dasan@CENTRAL.SUN.COM>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores
Date:         Sat, 23 Jan 1993 08:12:08 MST
Reply-To:     "Vasanthan S. Dasan" <Vasanthan.Dasan@Central.Sun.COM>
From:         "Vasanthan S. Dasan" <Vasanthan.Dasan@Central.Sun.COM>
Subject:      England v. Indian under-25 (1D - Cuttack, India, Jan 23)

   England captain Graham Gooch and Robin Smith warmed up for next
week's first Test against India with a run riot against an under-25
team on Saturday.  Gooch retired after making 102 and Robin Smith was
unbeaten on 103 as the tourists, electing to bat first, hit up 312 for
three by stumps on the opening day of the three-day match at the
near-empty Barabati Stadium here.

   With the International Cricket Council (ICC) yet to decide whether
matches played on rebel tours of South Africa would count as
first-class games, Gooch was uncertain if he had reached the coveted
100th-century mark.  But the 38-year-old England captain will be
pleased with his form ahead of the first of three Tests which start in
Calcutta's Eden Gardens on January 29.

   However, Mike Arthurton, Gooch's likely opening partner in the
first Test, however lasted only seven balls before being trapped lbw
by seamer Ashish Zaidi for no score.  Gooch and his deputy Alec
Stewart added 67 for the second wicket before Stewart (39) became the
second lbw victim, this time to off-spinner Pritam Gandhe.

   From 97 for two at lunch, England moved to 218 at tea without
further loss as Gooch and Smith toyed with the inexperienced home
attack through the afternoon session.  Gooch retired after tea to give
the others valuable batting practice and Mike Gatting responded with a
powerful 41.  Smith reached his century off the day's final delivery,
pulling home team captain Ajay Jadeja to the mid-wicket fence.

   England: Graham Gooch (captain), Mike Arthurton, Alec Stewart,
            Robin Smith, Mike Gatting, Graeme Hick, Chris Lewis,
            Ian Salisbury, Paul Taylor, Phil Tufnell, Devon Malcolm.

   Under-25 XI: Ajay Jadeja (captain), Samir Dighe, Abhay Khurasia,
            Jatin Paranjpe, Rajesh Puri, Rahul Dravid, Siraj Bahutale,
            Pritam Gandhe, Gyanendra Pandey, Ashish Winston Zaidi,
            Abey Kuruvilla.

England (first innings):

   G.A. Gooch retired........................ 102
   M.A. Arthurton lbw b Zaidi................   0
   A.J. Stewart lbw b Gandhe.................  39
   R.A. Smith not out........................ 103
   M.W. Gatting c Bahutale b Zaidi...........  41
   G.A. Hick not out.........................   4
   Extras: (b8, lb10, w1, nb4)...............  23
   Total: (for three wickets)................ 312

   Fall of wickets: 1-4, 2-71, 3-303

   Bowling: Kuruvilla 18-2-52-0, Zaidi 20-4-58-2, Gandhe 20-2-87-1,
            Bahutale 28-6-65-0, Pandey 4-0-20-0, Jadeja 7-2-12-0.

===
Xref: sparky rec.sport.cricket.scores:316 rec.sport.cricket:19844