From: nabeel@sce.carleton.ca (Bulbul)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.arabic
Subject: Re: Who is Crepin-Leblond
Date: 9 Nov 92 02:28:31 GMT
Organization: Carleton University

o.CRepin-leblond@ic.ac.UK (Olivier M.J. Crepin-Leblond, Olivier M.J.        Crepin-Leblond) writes:

>Nabeel, you have been flaming around for quite a while in this
>newsgroup. I must say that sometimes this is beneficial in order
>to get discussions going, but sometimes you go too far. Flaming
>Egyptians after the most horriffic earthquake in Cairo was just
>out of order. Moustafa (I know him, by the way) got well cheesed-off
>by your comments and indeed he had every right to be, just like
>all the other people you have attacked in the past. While reading
>your obscenities, I had conversations with another Egyptian friend
>of mine who could not manage to get through to his family for
>a whole week after the disaster. He didn't know if his family was
>dead or alive. I am sure that there were other people on the net
>in a similar situation, and they were subjected to your insanity
>at the wrong moment.
>So just remember: what you write is read by hundreds of silent readers
>and dozens of active readers who will reply to you. One day, a silent
>reader can't take any more of your nonsense and replies. That's all.

  M'sieu Olivier, I flamed the people who caused the disaster, i.e.
the negligence by the government and corrupt contractors who just
think about overstuffing their pockets. Due to this situation I will
skip my passion in this article and not flame. I did not expect that
the readers will think I am flaming them. In fact many journals
commented and criticised the performance of the Egyptian government
and media. And in the UK, Surakia, the weekly Arabic Journal issued
by Ghassan Zakariya, in its last issue (that we got in Ottawa) it
had an article by Khalid Sharif playing the same tune. Surakia is
going bankrupt, by the way.

   Monsieur, s.v.p. don't go with the current, before you comment on
something, you should give it a little more thought.

>Another thing which you may want to think of before posting is a
>sentence in a document that was written in a report by a large
>American computer company in the late 1970s. The report was setting-out
>guidelines, tips, and recommendations as to the use of electronic
>mail, and conferencing systems such as Usenet. It basically stated
>that "everything that you write may be archived, stored, quoted,
>with or without you consent, with or without your knowledge,
>for or against you, at any time in the future". 

   Oh, really, and they will capture me like Noriega? Anyway, I think
my posts are beyond this.

>You see, computers have this tendency to archive files and a great
>deal of newsgroups are archived around the world, officially or
>unofficially. Megabytes of information are hence stored on
>Magnetic tapes. So before you write something, think about it
>and if it's just there to start wars, don't complain if you
>get burned later.

   I am not complaining, I just know my limits. And by the way, what took
you two months of investigation [sic], took other readers a glance. I
always, deliberately leave signs in the articles I "forge" that the
article is not real. Once in another newsgroup, the readers thought I
was kidding when in an article I said it is not authentic. I do not do
it to twist facts as I claimed in a recent post. Hang on and you will
see that I am not kidding.


** a tres bientot
Xref: sparky soc.culture.arabic:4883 soc.culture.bosna-herzgvna:513