HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rick@ricksys.lonestar.org (Richard McCombs KB5SNF)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Tandy Bashing
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 06:01:00 CST
Distribution: na
Organization: The Red Headed League; Lawton, Ok
X-Newsreader: rusnews v0.96

oxenreid@chaos.cs.umn.edu () writes:

> Or get out of your Metro area, and make your self known to a 
> Radio Shack _Dealer_.  This is a franchise person, and  he/she takes 
> there money out of the till, and so they need work for their money.
> Tread carefully though, Radio Shaft is shafting its dealers too.

The problem with the dealers is that they won't honor the catalog
special on say a PA system where the catalog says that if you buy the
amp, 2 mikes and 2 speakers, you get $100 off or whatever it is.  They
also won't keep things that don't sell very often in stock even when
they are on sale because they'll "have to eat it."
--
Internet: rick@ricksys.lonestar.org,      bo836@cleveland.freenet.edu
UUCP: ...!rwsys!ricksys!rick,   {backbones}!ricksys.lonestar.org!rick
BITNET: bo836%cleveland.freenet.edu@cunyvm  Fidonet: Richard McCombs @ 1:385/6
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: jreese@NeoSoft.com (Jim Reese)
Subject: Re: 430 mhz band under th (now repeater costs)
Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 19:58:58 GMT

In article <1992Dec31.150918.17046@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) writes:

>Repeater councils have developed several ad hoc rules over the years for
>handling frequency coordinations. They boil down to basically, first come,
>first serve, and use it or lose it. But these rules *are* ad hoc and have
>no legal basis in the federal regulations where 97.101(b) says that "No
>frequency will be assigned for the exclusive use of any station." That
>seems pretty clear. Under federal regulations, a repeater council has
>no authority to assign a channel for the exclusive use of any repeater
>station. 

You are correct.  However, there is wording in part 97 that gives some
"preferential" treatment to coordinated systems in the event of repeater-
to-repeater interference.  There is no rule, however, that prevents anyone
from putting on a repeater.  The coordination organizations have no *real* 
power.  This is one of the reasons why they don't go very far past "first
come, first served".  They get sued otherwise.

>frequency usage must be on the basis of *most effective use*. That seems
>to paint small closed and private repeaters into a pretty tight corner
>when the spectrum is needed for more effective uses such as an open machine
>that serves a larger user base.

...but only if that open machine serves a larger user base.  As I have said
before, not all closed radios have low activity.  There are some closed
systems that are very active.  Do these active systems not deserve a frequency
just because they are closed? 

What I object to here is the automatic assumption that if it's closed, it's 
low usage.  This is simply not true in all cases.  It's very hard for a
frequency coordination group to determine who is "better" using their
frequency in a fair and equitable way.  To do otherwise leaves them open to
lawsuit, and they simply don't want the liability. 

-- 
     Jim Reese, WD5IYT            | "Real Texans never refer to trouble
  jreese@sugar.neosoft.com        |  as deep doo-doo"  --Molly Ivins

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: hyx1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Harry Y Xu)
Subject: Re: writing out -- --- .-. ... . in order to pass your exam
Reply-To: hyx1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Harry Y Xu)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 12:48:58 GMT

miles@ms.uky.edu (Stephen D. Grant) writes:
>at a recent W5YI VEC testing, a female wrote down all .'s and -'s and
>was allowed to do so. she got her general (while 4 others struggled).
>i was going to use this "cheat" method myself. is it legal or not?
>i'm confused.

After I passed the general, the VE noticed that I wrote the .'s and -'s
for a couple of pro-signs and numbers.  Then all 3 VE's got together to 
discuss the matter for nearly 10 minutes before deciding to pass me.
They said something like:  "We'll let you go this time.  But we'll have 
to fail you next time if you write down any dits and dahs."
They are ARRL.
Happy Holidays.
:-)  :->  :^(  8->
Harry Xu     | "The belief in a supernatural source of evil is not necessary;
(KB2LHA/AG)  |  men alone are quite capable of every wickedness." --J. Conrad
From: jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: 430mhz band under th
Date: 30 Dec 1992 21:27:13 GMT
Organization: UT Health Science Center Houston

In article <TRSNYDER.92Dec30160619@vf0031.mcs.drexel.edu> trsnyder@mcs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder) writes:
>In article <8245@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
>   It is simply not good amateur practice to hold a conversation on
>   the repeater's input frequency if you do not intend to use the
>   repeater. Folks have been held to be maliciously interfering with
>   the users of the repeater for doing so.
>Interesting.  I assume you have details on people being held to be maliciously
>interfering?

Not personally; I remember it happening, but not the specifics. There has been
at least one other comment in this thread about that, too.

Even if not, though, why would you want to hold a conversation on the
repeater's input frequency if you did not intend to use the repeater? Why that
particular frequency? Why not some other, either inside or outside the
repeater band?
-- 
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu      | adequately be explained by stupidity.
 "Brought to you by the letters O, S, and by the number 2." -- Mike Levis
From: POLS0@AIS.UCLA.EDU (Linda Stocks)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Format of Code Exams?
Date: 30 Dec 92 20:18:00 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

 Jud Ahern KC5RI writes:

> I'm studying up for my Extra code exam, and got to wondering: Is the
> exam multiple-choice or fill-in-the-blank? The FCC Rule Book says
> the format is up to the VEs, but what is the norm? Does it depend
> on whether the VE group is ARRL or W5YI, etc.? I'd think the
> multiple choice would be MUCH easier, no? Naturally, I plan to be
> at the point where it won't make any difference, but it is helpful
> to know what to expect when going into an exam.

Check with the VE group in advance. I have taken W5YI  and
GLAARG code tests and have given ARRL and GLAARG tests as a VE.
The W5YI test I took was a combination with 4 fill in the blanks
and 6 multiple choice questions.  GLAARG used to be fill in the
blanks but is now multiple choice.  All the ARRL ones I have
given have been multiple choice.  W5YI, ARRL, and probably most of
the others give the VE team the option of creating their own
tapes and test questions so it's really up to the VE team.

> Finally, is 7 correct out of 10 passing or not? I thought it was, but

Seven correct out of ten IS passing...as is one minute of perfect
copy.  Good Luck and 73's
***************************************************************
   Linda Stocks, AA6MR              pols0@ais.ucla.edu
                                    aa6mr@wb6wfh#soca.ca.usa
                  Eschew obfuscation
***************************************************************
From: trasmuss@pea.csc.calpoly.edu (Thor Rasmussen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Kenwood TH-78 handie-talkie MODIFICATION/ Singapore purchase
Date: 21 Dec 92 20:00:38 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Department, Cal Poly SLO

I am considering buying a Kenwood TH-78 dual band handi-talkie and have
some questions about it. I want to be able to modify it for out of band
transmission (Specifically to transmit at 158 MHz). I was going to buy the
"Radio / Tech Modifications" book by Artsci Publications from a local ham
shop to find how to do the modification. I told the guy at the store what
I wanted to do and he read a warning notice that said not to do the mod on 
the new Kenwood TH-78 radio. He didn't have any details why not, and I 
didn't get to ask if the warning was from Kenwood or from Artsci 
publications. 

I would like to know if I buy a new Kenwood TH-78 if I will still be able to
modify it for out of band tranmission and cross band repeating. A friend of
mine bought a TH-78 last May and was able to modify his radio. Has there been
a change in the radio since then that would require a differnt mod? If any one
knows if a mod is still possible and what the warning is all about I would
appreciate it if you could send me e-mail telling me the situation.


A second concern is that a friend of mine is currently in Sinapore and thinks he can pick up ham handie talkies there at prices far below US prices. I
was planning to order a Kenwood TH-78 from a US ham store for around $450.
The problem is that the ham store only has a couple of HT's at that price 
and the price will go up to $500 when they run out. 

My question is that if my friend can get the TH-78 at a price well below
the $450 price, should I have him buy one for me instead? Is there going
to be a problem using a rig that was meant for use in Sinagapore? Will he
be able to get it through customs?


If you can help me, please send me e-mail directly. I need to make a decision by
Tuesday and may not have time to read responses on the net.
My e-mail address is:
   trasmuss@nike.calpoly.edu


Thanks in advance for any help!

Thor Rasmussen - N6FNP
(408) 373-8316
From: kchen@Apple.COM (Kok Chen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: MFJ Loop antenna? (was Re: AEA Isoloop comments wanted)
Date: 24 Dec 92 21:26:06 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

uri@watson.ibm.com (Uri Blumenthal) writes:

>In article <1992Dec23.162738.7909@random.ccs.northeastern.edu>, acm139@ccs.northeastern.edu (Scott Ehrlich) writes:
>|> .....................
>|> I'd really appreciate any and all comments regarding the 
>|> AEA Isoloop antenna.  Is it worth the approximate $300? 

>MFJ Loop Antenna looks like AEA IsoLoop, and costs $100 less.
>Anybody cares to compare the two and comment on both?


A local store, who don't yet have the MFJ in stock, warned that,
as shipped, the MFJ can only be mounted with the loop in the vertical
plane (i.e., directional).  I haven't seen a real live one to verify.

73, happy holidays and see y'all on SKN,

Kok Chen, AA6TY				kchen@apple.com
Apple Computer, Inc.
From: pjml@swmis.nerc-swindon.ac.UK (Pete Lucas)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Auto RFI susceptibility.
Date: 31 Dec 92 10:35:59 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu


An alternative to giving each dealer a grilling on the subject is to see what
your local Police department/emergency-services people are driving, and
buy the same. It is often possible to specify 'Police-spec' build when
selecting your vehicle; these special-build variants usually come with the
alternator, battery etc. uprated to handle the increased current drain of
mobile radios, light-bars etc, and if you are lucky, may also include
heavy-duty brakes & suspension.
A colleague of mine just bought a Range-Rover; he chose a 'Fleetline'-spec.
model as supplied to the UK police-forces. It was significantly cheaper than
the standard model; (OK it lacked the sunroof, aircon and leather seats) but
it *did* have an alternator with 50% greater output, an enormous battery,
and a professionally-installed power harness just ideal for wiring radios to;
it also had extra suppressors fitted to the spark-plugs.
 
-Pete Lucas   G6WBJ    PJML@UKAC.NSW.SWMIS
From: mikef@pacifier.rain.com (Mike Freeman)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Info-Hams Digest V92 #1326
Summary: It Works
Date: 21 Dec 92 16:58:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: pacifier.1992Dec21.165837.19880
Organization: Pacifier BBS

In article <921218090036.00002d71.peter@lu-maxlab.maxlab.lu.se> Peter.Rojsel@maxlab.lu.SE writes:
>Nothing I have ever sent has appeared (yet). Perhaps the delay is several 
>weeks, from recieving until publication. I have tried, and tried, and tried, 
>but I have never seen anything of my own here. Is this list just a bogus list 
>made and sent out by someone for his own amusement?
>
Well, the above made it with no problems.  No, the list is
obviously not bogus; I've posted stuff to Info-hams and had it
make it thru the system numerous times before I had a Usenet
feed.

Check your mail feed.  ES GL.

-- 
Mike Freeman <K7UIJ>    |       Internet: mikef@pacifier.rain.com
301 N.E. 107th Street   |         or freeman@watsun.cc.columbia.edu
Vancouver, WA 98685 USA |       GEnie: M.FREEMAN11
Telephone (206)574-8221 |       I doubt, therefore I might be!
Xref: sparky rec.radio.amateur.misc:21257 rec.radio.amateur.packet:3308 rec.radio.amateur.policy:1980 rec.radio.shortwave:8930 rec.radio.cb:1581 rec.radio.noncomm:623 alt.radio.scanner:3404
From: mark@ve6mgs.ampr.org (Mark G. Salyzyn)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.packet,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.noncomm,rec.radio.info,alt.radio.scanner
Subject: rec.radio.info Passes, news at 11
Summary: QSL:215 QRT:51
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 92 04:44:44 GMT
Reply-To: rec-radio-request@ve6mgs.ampr.ab.ca
Organization: Amateur Packet Radio E-mail Gateway  VE6MGS

rec.radio.info passes 215 Yes, 51 Nay. The official creation date will be set
by the news.announce.newgroups moderator, my guess sometime into the new year.
Any individuals that feel they provide informational postings on a regular
basis in the rec.radio.* heirarchy should contact me to get deputized as
co-moderators. You *will* find the additional load to be *nil*! Please send
these requests to:

	rec-radio-request@ve6mgs.ampr.ab.ca

Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, 73 de VE6MGS/Mark -sk-
From: oler@rho.uleth.CA (Cary Oler)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Daily Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for 24 December
Date: 25 Dec 92 09:03:53 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

!!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 359, 12/24/92
10.7 FLUX=136.3  90-AVG=139        SSN=127      BKI=0223 2231  BAI=007
BGND-XRAY=B3.4     FLU1=9.0E+05  FLU10=1.1E+04  PKI=0223 2231  PAI=006
  BOU-DEV=004,017,011,024,015,013,027,006   DEV-AVG=014 NT     SWF=00:000
 XRAY-MAX= B6.9   @ 1301UT    XRAY-MIN= B2.9   @ 1959UT   XRAY-AVG= B3.9
NEUTN-MAX= +003%  @ 2240UT   NEUTN-MIN= -001%  @ 1600UT  NEUTN-AVG= +0.6%
  PCA-MAX= +0.1DB @ 2315UT     PCA-MIN= -0.2DB @ 1930UT    PCA-AVG= -0.0DB
BOUTF-MAX=55421NT @ 1525UT   BOUTF-MIN=55391NT @ 1906UT  BOUTF-AVG=55414NT
GOES7-MAX=P:+096NT@ 1902UT   GOES7-MIN=N:+000NT@ 1035UT  G7-AVG=+075,+029,+008
GOES6-MAX=P:+116NT@ 1902UT   GOES6-MIN=E:-011NT@ 0146UT  G6-AVG=+108,-006,+021
 FLUXFCST=STD:130,125,125;SESC:130,125,125 BAI/PAI-FCST=015,025,025/018,035,040
    KFCST=1123 4455 4455 6443  27DAY-AP=004,005   27DAY-KP=2112 2211 1122 1122
 WARNINGS=
   ALERTS=**245STRM:0708-1359UTC
!!END-DATA!!
From: wimn@hpuamsc.NETh.hp.COM (Wim Nijntjes)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Sun-rise Sun-Set
Date: 22 Dec 92 08:08:22 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

Who knows how to calulate the times for sunrise and sunset?
I'm searching for a program to solve this little problem.

Also the moon behaviour I'm interrrested in.

Thanks for reading this........
 


 Wim Nijntjes
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: rcanders@nyx.cs.du.edu (Rod Anderson)
Subject: diy uncoordinated repeater
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 20:36:15 GMT



Thanks to the improvements in technology there is no longer any reason
for repeaters to not share frequency pairs.  To set up a uncoordinated
repeater I would suggest the doing the following:
 
1.  If you think that a repeater frequency pair is under used set up a
receiver and a tape recorder with vox to turn on the recorder when
there is a audio signal on the frequency.  Do this for several months
so you can state how much it is used.  Look for a frequency that is
used less than 10 hours a month or less.
 
2.  Set up your repeater on this frequency.  It will be necessary to
use PL on the input and also on its output.  One additional receiver
will be necessary.  This is to be set to the output frequency of the
repeater whose frequency you are sharing.  This is connected to
prevent your transmitter from transmitting when the other repeater is
transmitting.  Therefore you will not be interfering with the other
repeater.
 
3.  Check with a lawyer, I don't think that a state court would have
jurisdiction, the FCC preempts local laws, but find out first.  Then
if you are sued in a state court you can clam that they don't have
jurisdiction on the matter.
 
4.  Send a petition to the FCC to require repeaters to share
frequencies as much as possible.  Also lobby the ARRL and the local
coordinator to not have frequency assignments exclusive.
 
Only share the frequency of the private ego repeaters which have _VERY_
little traffic.  If all the frequency pairs are used up and they all
are used heavily then don't try the above.
 
Rod Anderson            N0NZO            rcanders@nyx.cs.du.edu


Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: jeffj@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (jeffrey.n.jones)
Subject: Wanted Delaware and Vermont for CW WAS
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 16:24:40 GMT

Hopefully someone can help me from those fine states to get my CW WAS.
Anything from 15 or 20 meters would probably be best. Maybe even 
40 or 80 meters on a good night. I live in the Bay Area near San Francisco
so it's a cross country shot. I will QSL and pay return postage of course!
Have a happy new year and 73!

Jeff
-- 
 Jeff Jones  AB6MB         |      
 jeffj@seeker.mystic.com   |     
 Infolinc BBS 415-778-5929 |
From: pjml@swmis.nerc-swindon.ac.UK (Pete Lucas)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Alternator Noise
Date: 21 Dec 92 09:49:29 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu


Check the alternator. I have seen several that have failed diodes in
the bridge.  Normally an alternator is a 3-phase machine so the ripple
component is small; but if one winding (or a diode) fails, it can easily
become a two-phase machine. The missing phase knocks a big hole in the
output waveform, but it may still be generating enough to recharge the
battery when the vehicle is used with the 'right' duty-cycle.
You may only find out about this problem after a long night-time
drive with all the accessories on....
Really heavy waveform distortion can affect things other than your radio;
like injection ECUs!  A local Porsche-freak replaced most of his injection
system (ECU, airflow-meter, loads of sensors) trying to cure lumpy running
at over 5500RPM; it turned out the regulator on his alternator was mentally
deranged, and the battery supply line had 45-volt spikes all over it,
causing false triggering of the injection.
 
Also check the ground between the battery - terminal and the chassis or
engine-block; this is often corroded, and can lead to noise in the
strangest of places.

Modern alternators do not normally need filter capacitors in my experience;
(certainly the Bosch units i am familiar with have always had internal
suppression, though other brands may not).

-Pete Lucas    PJML@swmis.nsw.ac.uk    G6WBJ   +++    If it GROWS,
NERC COmputer Services, Swindon, England.      +++       GOBBLE IT!

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: jreese@NeoSoft.com (Jim Reese)
Subject: Re: 430mhz band under th
Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 19:16:38 GMT

I have some additional comments on this subject, please forgive me if I miss
the attributions...

In article <8233@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
>
>>The FCC doesn't need whining Hams who can't negotiate among themselves a simple
>>peaceful solution.  And they are certainly NOT going to take action based on
>>a "call".
>
>Depends on who, and what, and how... I agree that we need to negotiate
>peaceful solutions. My response was to someone who (apparently) isn't
>interested in negotiating, but rather in asserting his rights - which turn
>out, mainly, to be his right to be disruptive.

>The original poster was asserting something quite different, though. He was
>saying. "I don't care if you put a repeater there. I have the unconditional
>right to transmit on that frequency, and I'M GONNA USE IT!"


...and there are many people who do just this.  It's one thing to disagree
about closed repeaters in person (or by computer :) ), but it's entirely
another to get on someone's input frequency and say "You can't keep me from
talking here!"  That's jamming.

-- 
     Jim Reese, WD5IYT            | "Real Texans never refer to trouble
  jreese@sugar.neosoft.com        |  as deep doo-doo"  --Molly Ivins

From: Claton.Cadmus@f100.n282.z1.tdkt.kksys.com (Claton Cadmus)
Sender: FredGate@tdkt.kksys.com
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Seeking Weathercube mods
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 13:30:12 -0600

DT>Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
DT>Reply-To: dmturne@PacBell.COM (Dave Turner)

DT>In article <20360116@hplsla.hp.com> tomb@hplsla.hp.com (Tom Bruhns) writes:
DT>>Last night I picked up a Radio Shack "weathercube" receiver.  I
DT>>recall that there was an article in QST some years ago that mentioned
DT>>how to modify it to give some 2 meter coverage.  Can anyone point me
DT>>to that article or similar mods?

DT>QST June 1987:

DT>        The W2CXM 2-Meter Cube Receiver and Scanner

I have built this 2 meter conversion and it works fairly well.  Two
things it needs.  The freq. drifts as the battery loses power so I would
suggest you install a small 8 volt regulator and the front end is less
than ideal.  An RF amp would be a very useful addition.

Claton Cadmus,  KA0GKC

Packet:         KA0GKC @ WB0GDB.MN.USA.NA
Fido Netmail:   Claton Cadmus  1:282./100
Internet Email: Claton.Cadmus@f100.n282.z1.tdkt.kksys.com


 * SLMR 2.1a * Rule #1 of intelligent tinkering is to save all the parts

 * Origin: HAM>link< RBBS 612/HAM-0000 Saint Paul, MN (K0TG) (1:282/100)
From: dave@eram.esi.COM.AU (Dave Horsfall)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Converting 49Mhz Toys to 6 meters
Date: 23 Dec 92 07:13:59 GMT
Organization: Pacific ESI, Sydney, AUSTRALIA
X-Disclaimer: "Me, speak for us?"
X-Witty-Saying: "Mobius strip - see other side for instructions"

If those are the same as Tandy sell here (except ours are on 55 MHz)
they are readily converted to 6m.  Change xtals and re-tweak.  And
they are indeed QRP - they draw more current on receive (audio) than
on xmit!  They have a good front end too, surprisingly enough given its
size.  And they can potentially be used with a repeater split; the Rx
and the Tx have no common sections.

I have fun in walking into Tandy, asking to see them, sales-creature
brings out two, and I buy one :-)  Confuses the heck out of them...

-- 
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU)         VK2KFU @ VK2RWI.NSW.AUS.OC
dave@esi.COM.AU                ...munnari!esi.COM.AU!dave
From: Mike.Tarver@f7009.n124.z1.fidonet.org (Mike Tarver)
Sender: FredGate@ocitor.fidonet
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: forward to
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 14:15:00

Mark, I hope this is correct. Please forward this message to Robert Shaw
Internet: shaw@itu.arcom.ch

Mr. Robert Shaw
Teledoc Project Coordinator
Information Services Dept. ITU PLace de Nations Geneva Switzerland

Mr, Shaw
   Please send me instrution on how to acess the Teledoc system and a list of
help commands.
A list of what is avaible would aslo be appreciated.
Thank You
Mike Tarver
ComPort One  Garland Texas U.S.A.

 * Origin: Com Port 1 - DFW Amateur Radio BBS (214) 226-1181 (1:124/7009)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc