HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: paul@fugu.Data-IO.COM (Paul Brownlow)
Subject: Re: <ring> <ring>
Organization: Data I/O Corporation
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 19:17:53 GMT

In article <1992Dec11.153959.6750@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>, golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:
|> 
|> As for Seattle, perhaps the NHL owners should start inviting Bill
|> Gates to hockey games...

Well, Microsoft regularly has groups at Thunderbirds games, and I saw
a big "Microsoft" on the boards in Ottawa on HNiC. :-)  Having Bill
as an owner would be fine, if he would be anything like his friend
and Portland Trailblazer owner Paul Allen.  However, people tried
to get Bill to buy the Mariners in the last go-round and it didn't
work.  And, with the NHL here, the only people who could afford to
go to the games would be Bill and his friends.

Thanks, but we're fine with the T-Birds and Canucks.

-- 
Paul Brownlow				|         Visualize 
Data I/O Corp.  Redmond, WA		|	   Whirled
paul@data-io.com			|	    Peas
					|
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson)
Subject: Re: The Expansion 
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 11:24:22 GMT

harrison@mpr.ca (Jeff Harrison) wrote:
>As an aside, I vote for the "Miami Vice".

They can put some sort of symbol for ice on it and for the "V" they can !BUY!
the rights to Vancouver's old V. If that won't spell the demise of the
franchise, nothing will. 8-)

Tom
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Anaheim and Miami. WHY?!!
Organization: Rice University
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 18:09:50 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.162804.16036@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>, daniell@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Daniel Lyddy) writes:
>In article <1992Dec15.110940.24270@abo.fi> MLINDROOS@FINABO.ABO.FI (Marcus Lindroos INF) writes:
>>
>>Yeah, no question that Houston would have been better than Anaheim. As you
>>said, the league wanted to make sure they got new owners with enough cash to
>>remain in the game. Texas could get a team after 1995 if all goes well.
>>BTW, what city should it be - Houston or Dallas? I'd choose Houston
>>because they've had countless minor-league teams since the 1960s, including the
>>short-lived but successful Aeros WHA team. Hockey seems to be a relatively
>>unknown sport in the Dallas area.
>> 
>>MARCU$
>
>I'm not so sure--I was in the Galleria mall in Richardson about ten years ago,
>and I was surprised to find that the mall had an open skating rink in its
>'plaza' section.  What was more surprising was that the kids and even some g 
>adults actually knew how to skate.  I know that since then a few NHL exhibitions
>have been played in Dallas to packed houses--some fans even brought signs that
>read "NHL in Dallas next" or some such.  Besides, the players in Houston would
>spend too much time in jail--after all those bar fights with off-duty Houston
>cops :) :).

Packed houses?  Funny, but the last two NHL exhibitions I remember at Reunion 
drew about 12,000 and 8000 -- and that 12,000 was for a Pittsburgh-LA pairing
a couple of years ago.  We got Hartford and Los Angeles one year, then the
Kings and St. Louis the next -- and even though both games were on Sunday
nights (which never were good nights at the gate in the WHA days), we still
managed to draw 10,000 for one and almost 9000 for the other.
(The regular-season Islanders-Blues game last night pulled in 11,000 -- and
unless something funny's going on, I remember the capacity at Reunion is 16,656
for hockey.  Capacity crowds, they ain't.)

-- 
Patrick L. Humphrey  (patrick@is.rice.edu)  Rice Networking & Computing Systems
     +1 713 528-3626 at Rice. 776-1541 at home. 667-6554 at Palace Lanes. 
                     Support the Second Republic of Texas!
               (If at first you don't secede, try, try again...)
From: eliot@cs.ubc.ca (Katie Eliot)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Canucks coaching strategy
Date: 17 Dec 1992 13:04:09 -0800
Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: cascade.cs.ubc.ca
Keywords: CHANGE?

The Canucks are starting to look too familiar as they skate through
their games.  Why won't Pat Quinn change up their strategies -- i.e.,
more passing from the goalie up to defense or forwards, go after the
point men when defending against a power play, go cross-ice instead of
behind the net?  I watched them lose to the OIlers last night and the
Oilers seemed to have the Canucks all figured out.  Few plays were
imaginative or even responsive to the situation -- I think the team
plays well together but should try to get better rebounds from pucks
shot off the boards, and even off of opposing players in front of their
goalie!!  Easy to say, much harder to do but I'd like to see them try
some new things and have fun again!
From: gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary L. Newell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Boston Massacre!!!!!!!!!!
Date: 17 Dec 92 19:12:24 GMT
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <BzDvut.GC5@cs.mcgill.ca>, shayne@cs.mcgill.ca (Lydia Mancini) writes:
> In article <1992Dec14.004001.23942@cs.ucf.edu> wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson) writes:
> >If I recall, when Boston destroyed Montreal last year in the
> >playoffs 90% of the Bruins fans were pretty gracious about not spewing trash
> >all over the net.
> Not exactly, I got mail by a few. 

 I think his point was that Bruin's fans did not use a public forum to
wipe you pathetic Hab-loving nose into the ground when the B's trounced
them inside and out last season and sent them to the golf course without
really breaking a sweat - of course I could be wrong....



			gln
From: ferguson@cs.rochester.edu (George Ferguson)
Subject: Re: Don Cherry's Coach's Corner summary - Dec. 12, 1992
Reply-To: ferguson@cs.rochester.edu (George Ferguson)
Organization: University of Rochester Hockey Science Dept.
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 20:39:36 GMT


In article <28179@optima.cs.arizona.edu> gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary L. Newell) writes:
>Face it - Don's just reading my posts and saying whatever I say - and
>frankly he's pissing me off.....

gArY, does this mean you're *denying* that you're really Don Cherry? I
mean, I've never seen to two of you together and I always kinda
wondered...

George
-- 
George Ferguson                 ARPA: ferguson@cs.rochester.edu
Dept. of Computer Science       UUCP: rutgers!rochester!ferguson
University of Rochester         VOX:  (716) 275-2527
Rochester  NY  14627-0226       FAX:  (716) 461-2018
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy)
Subject: Re: The Anaheim Mice and the Miami vICE may be in!
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 20:30:17 GMT

In article <BzD7p8.Ex9@ccu.umanitoba.ca> umturne4@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Daryl Turner) writes:
>In article <1992Dec11.184840.14067@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:
>>
>>Hamilton has to give the NHL a certified cheque for $100 million
>>dollars...if Hamilton is going to get an expansion team, the money
>>pretty much is going to have to waved in their faces...(or $50 million
>>dollars in the case of moving an established team).
>
>Lessee...Miami gets a franchise for $50 million, Anaheim gets one for
>$25 million, and yet, it will cost Hamilton $100 million?  Pray tell,
>why, Gerald?  If Hamilton were to walk into NHL offices with a cheque
>for $50 million US and received any worse treatment than Anaheim and
>Miami, I'd say something stunk bigtime.  
>
>I would agree with you that the NHL isn't going to go out of its way to
>PUT a team in Hamilton, but if they acted just like Disney, why couldn't
>they get a franchise?
>

That's exactly what I have been saying.

Hamilton needs $100 million...$50 million for the franchise, and $25 
million for the two teams, Toronto and Buffalo, whose areas they are
encroaching upon...so far, unlike Miami and Disney...no one from
Hamilton has put the money on the table...they mostly whine.

Disney has clout...the other owners paid McNall's indemnification for
Disney...Hamilton will not be that lucky.

Now Hamilton will likely eventually get a team...basically because
the team would able to fill the seats...but Hamilton has constantly
missed the boat, because they expect someone else to do something
for them as happened with the WHA, and with the previous Ottawa
and Tampa expansion.  

Gerald
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: c5ff@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (COOK  Charlie)
Subject: Re: The Miami ???? vs the Anaheim ?????
Organization: University of New Brunswick
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 21:16:22 GMT

OK, here are a few more to add to the already listed ideas.

Miami area team:
Florida Oranges
Florida Sunshine
Florida Keys
Florida Swamp Things
Miami Reefers (kind of a vice/aquatic combination)
Miami Porpoises
Miami Flippers

Anaheim area team:
California Surfer Dudes
California Raisins
Anaheim Mousketeers
The Disney Goof Troop
Anaheim Andreas Faults



Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: jmcgarry@suppserv.ccs.uoguelph.ca (James McGarry)
Subject: Tommy Soderstrom
Organization: Computing & Communication Services, University of Guelph
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:56:01 GMT
X-Posted-From: jmcgarry.cs.uoguelph.ca
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

Did anyone get to see the Flyers play last night?
I was wondering how Tommy Soderstrom played.
Any info would be appreciated.


                 Thanks
                 James McGarry
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: geddes@col.hp.com (Bill Geddes)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Kings #1?!? Hahahahahahaha! (was Re: Bruins Playing over their hea
Date: 11 Dec 1992 22:23:15 GMT
Organization: Colorado Springs Information Technology Center
NNTP-Posting-Host: tbone2.cs.itc.hp.com

Who cares, after all it's who wins the most out of 82 games.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: gak@wrs.com (Richard Stueven)
Subject: Re: Oh, my dear *Lord*!  It's the Seventh Sign!
Reply-To: gak@wrs.com
Organization: Wind River Systems, Inc.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 18:52:07 GMT

In article 1gt3feINN3gg@keats.rick.cs.ubc.ca, p7z092@rick.cs.ubc.ca (Anthony Jang) writes:
>
>Perhaps from a marketing standpoint the "Mighty Ducks" will prove to
>be popular with the (very) young and open up hockey to a new generation.
>But what happens when these youngsters go to a game and Tie Domi beats
>the tar out of a "Duck"?

Yeah, but think of the fun when a "Duck" beats the tar out of Tie Domi!

gak

---
Richard Stueven       AHA# 22584 |----------| If the trees are bare, if the
Internet:            gak@wrs.com |----GO----| skies are gray, if the Zamboni
ATTMAIL: ...!attmail!gakhaus!gak |---SHARX--| is running, can winter be far
Cow Palace:            107/H/3-4 |----------| behind?  -C.Schulz

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: nlu@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Nelson Lu)
Subject: Re: Blues brush off Sharks 3-2
Keywords: St. Louis Blues, Sharks, Hull, Janney
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 00:55:26 GMT

In article <1992Dec11.221002.22758@wuecl.wustl.edu> jca2@cec1.wustl.edu (Joseph Charles Achkar) writes:

>      Russian countryman Ozolinsh made it close at the end, scoring on a
>rebound with 49.3 seconds to play, but the Blues held on for the victory.

Hmmm...  I think Ozolinsh will take this as an insult. :-)  He's Latvian.

===============================================================================
"M. C. Hamrlik: Can't Touch This Lightning."
GO LOS ANGELES KINGS!  Luc Robitaille for Hart!
GO SAN JOSE SHARKS!  Sandis Ozolinsh for Calder!  Jeff Hackett for Vezina!
===============================================================================
Nelson Lu (claudius@leland.stanford.edu)
rec.sport.hockey contact for the San Jose Sharks
From: wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson)
Subject: population (Re: The Anaheim Mice...)
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 07:35:27 GMT

srklump@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu (Stephen Klump) wrote:
>Raw population is not sufficient to draw interest - Calgary, with a pop.
>of 800 000, outdraws Chicago, with a population of what, ten million?

Nice try. Give us a break. Perhaps the large seating capacity in Calgary gives
them a slight advantage? Doesn't Chicago sellout just about every game?
I think if they had a rink for 20,000 they would fill it. They've only had
a team for more than 70 years. I think they have some fans there.

Tom
Organization: H&SS Dean's Office, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 13:16:55 -0500 
From: Anna Matyas <am2x+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Hot Pens Trade Rumor


Eric Rickin writes:

>After being in Ann Arbor for long enough, I have a feeling that if
>Yzerman was traded, there would be a stink, but a lot more people would
>be happy than mad.  But, if probert was traded, all hell would break
>loose.

Yeah, but people get over these things.  I thought Philadelphia (the
city, not the team) would crumble when Tocchet left.  But I was just
there a few weeks ago and it's still standing.

All hell might break loose at MY house, though.  I lose Paul Coffey and
end up with Ulf Samuelsson and Bob Probert.  Sheesh.  (Actually, I think
Probert would fit in rather well to the Pens' line-up and he would most
likely play more hockey and do less gooning here.)

Mom.
From: haral@unisol.com (Haral Tsitsivas)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Don Cherry and Sandstrom
Date: 11 Dec 92 18:02:17 GMT
Organization: UniSolutions Associates

In article <1992Dec11.090543.10672@eua.ericsson.se>, euaaen@eua.ericsson.se (Anders Engwall) writes:
|> Aren't both Sandstrom and U. Samuelsson [the two swedes referred to]
|> originally from the small town of Fagersta? Sandstrom definitely is,
|> but I'm unsure of Ulfie.

Sandstrom was born in Jakobstad, Finland, and moved to Sweden as a younster...

-- 
--Haral Tsitsivas,  UniSolutions Associates
  Voice: (310) 542-0068,  Fax: (310) 370-4024,  E-mail: haral@unisol.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy)
Subject: Re: FLYERS notes 12/12
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Distribution: na
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 19:14:25 GMT

In article <kcapie.724196904@camelot> kcapie@camelot.bradley.edu (Kevin Capie) writes:
>
>What is the deal with Lindros?  He was originally only to be out until the      Quebec game missing the games against Ottawa and Boston at the very most.  Is   the injury more severe than first thought?

If you had nearly a $50 million dollar investment in a player, in a
season where the Stanley Cup prospects are nil...would you rush the
player back from a knee injury?

Gerald
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: p7z092@rick.cs.ubc.ca (Anthony Jang)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Oh, my dear *Lord*!  It's the Seventh Sign!
Date: 18 Dec 1992 09:58:06 -0800
Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: keats.rick.cs.ubc.ca

>simpson@bnr.ca (Scott Simpson) writes:
>It has become quasi-official.  Eisner wasn't joking.
>They're the Anaheim Mighty Ducks.  Same sweaters, too.

I guess that's what happens when the NHL gives franchises to people/organ-
izations that don't have a clue what hockey is about.

Perhaps from a marketing standpoint the "Mighty Ducks" will prove to
be popular with the (very) young and open up hockey to a new generation.
But what happens when these youngsters go to a game and Tie Domi beats
the tar out of a "Duck"?

I heard a rumour suggesting the Miami team was going to be called the
"Miami VideoBusters".

It's times like these that I think the NHL should start from scratch.

Just my thoughts,
Tony
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: aranta@milton.u.washington.edu (Aaron Ranta)
Subject: Re: The Miami ???? vs the Anaheim ?????
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 18:13:21 GMT

In article <BzAHpA.ILs@cs.psu.edu> jdh@math.psu.edu (Jeremy D Hall) writes:
>
>Same here...how about the Miami Thunder?  :^) (Heck, we've got the Lightning)
>

Hmmm.. well, as far as I can tell, most of the sports teams from the Florida
area seem to be named after weather (Lightning,Hurricanes,Thunder(isn't that
the World Football League team (you know, the ones with the florescent
green jerseys)?) or after large salt water marine-life (Marlins,Dolphins).

Hmm... well, Thunder is out... how about the Miami Manatees?
(are there saltwater alligators?)

*chuckle*

Aaron.
From: carrd@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: Housley to be traded
Date: 16 Dec 92 12:29:36 EST

Although Housley would be a quality addition to just about any team, If Murray
trades Chaison (sp?), Cummins, Kennedy and Primeau for him Ilitch should can
him on the spot.  Trade alot of good, young players for a guy 28 thats been
in the NHL since high school - Come ON!  The Wings already have Racine, and
I thought they acquired Howe to quarterback the powerplay.  

What they need is a big defenseman with a mean streak, a Stevens, Manson, 
Hatcher (I know thats what all teams want...).

Dave

Organization: H&SS Dean's Office, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 09:08:00 -0500 
From: Anna Matyas <am2x+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: The Miami ???? vs the Anaheim ?????


>>>>Anyone have any ideas for nicknames for the new teams?
> 
>>>             Miami
>>>             1) Traffickers
>>>             2) Coral
>>>             3) Tropics
>>>             4) Southiques 

The Miami Vice.

Mom.
From: epp@mala.bc.ca (Lorne Epp)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: The Miami ???? vs the Anaheim ?????
Date: 15 Dec 92 18:33:27 -0700
Organization: Malaspina College

In article <1992Dec13.134801.28514@abo.fi>, MLINDROOS@FINABO.ABO.FI (Marcus Lindroos INF) writes:
> In <1992Dec11.170111.20032@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca> cs902159@ariel.yorku.ca writes:
> 
>> 
>> Anyone have any ideas for nicknames for the new teams?
>> How about some jokes and some serious ones
>> 
> How 'bout the Miami Snowbirds (=most fans are Canadians/easterners anyway) and
> the California Gold (=as in the 1849 gold rush)?
>  

What the hell, why don't we just call them the California Golden Seals
and make them wear green skates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lorne Epp                                               epp@mala.bc.ca
From: gomer+@pitt.edu (Richard J Coyle)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: trade rumor
Date: 17 Dec 92 01:53:28 GMT
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <Af=nZ4u00Uh701iHAO@andrew.cmu.edu> am2x+@andrew.cmu.edu (Anna Matyas) writes:
>Food for thought.  Folks were talking about this rumor last night:
>Jaromir Jagr and unnamed player(s) for Brett Hull.
>
>Hmmm...Hull isn't happy in St Louis.  Jagr has said he'll go anywhere
>for the money (but he also wants sunshine and pretty girls).  Would
>Hull be happy on the second (or third?!) line?

A) only an idiot would trade Hull for Jagr, even up.  Even in an off
   year, Hull will outscore him.  Besides, Jagr is going to end up as
   a head case, if he isn't already.

B) the Pens don't need offense, which is the only thing Hull provides

C) the Pens wouldn't (couldn't) afford him.

All that said, I wouldn't be a bit surprised to see Jagr get moved
within a year or two, if not sooner.  Although he has a knack for the
big goals, he's extremely one-dimensional.  Markus Naslund will probably
be able to replace him offensively, if necessary.  MacEachern needs more
ice time, and deserves it.  Jagr's just going to get more and more
expensive, and if he ever does have a really big year he's guaranteed to
want to renegotiate.  I say, trade him for a big-name defensive
defenseman, or for a young big-time center.  The Pens will need both
in another year or two.

rick
From: houston@eso.mc.xerox.com (Sam Houston)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: Re: AHL standings
Date: 16 Dec 92 21:37:19 GMT
Reply-To: houston@eso.mc.xerox.com
Organization: Xerox Corporation, Webster NY

In article 724515613@craft.camp.clarkson.edu, farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Droopy) writes:
>Sorry for the last post....it was intended to be email not a followup.
>sorry.
>
>BRI


Oh sure, dump on a loyal Rochester fan in public & then make believe it's
a mistake!!  What can one expect from somebody who apparently idolizes those
Glens Falls figure skaters in their cute litle red uniforms, *and* is affiliated
with a second-rate college hockey school :-)

Keep up the AHL postings, Droopy--I'll be checking the scores, tho

------------------------------------------
"sam" houston
Xerox, Rochester, N.Y.
the (ex) flower (flour) city 
and home of the mighty Amerks  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: 2005bj@gmuvax.gmu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
Subject: LETS GO CAPS!
Date: 14 Dec 92 06:21:41 -0500
Organization: George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

AFTER A HORRIBLE START, THE CAPS ARE CURRENTLY IN A 7-0 RUN, AND IN 
SECOND PLACE IN THE PATRICK DIVISION. WITH SUCH TALENTS AS MIKE RIDLEY,
KEVIN HATCHER, PETER BONDRA, AND AL IAFRATE (THE HOTTEST PLAYER IN THE
NHL RIGHT NOW), THEY ARE ONE OF THE HARDEST TEAMS TO BEAT RIGHT NOW.

MARCOS DE SOUZA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: uskirshn@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Steven Kirshner)
Subject: Re: Americans <> Hockey
Organization: Educational Computing Network
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 07:25:25 GMT

In article <farenebt.723896109@craft.camp.clarkson.edu> farenebt@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (droopy) writes:
>jdelorey@fairfax.stfx.ca (John DeLorey) writes:
>
>>What is this load of crap that Americans don't like hockey because they dont
>>like the fighting.  How then do you explain the 50,000 fans they pack in for
>>WWF?????
>
>				
>No, no, no. You misuunderstood. A lot of Americans don't like the fact that
>that stupid ice game interferes with their wrestling.
>
>BFI FARENELL
>FARENEBT@CRAFT.CAMP.CLARKSON.EDU

You guys are just jealous because you can't get the Cup back into Canada
anymore....
      U.S. Hockey Kicks!!!!!
                                         steve

Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey
From: jlundy@bilbo.encore.com (Joe Lundy)
Subject: Re: The Miami ???? vs the Anaheim ?????
Organization: Encore Computer Corp.
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:21:28 GMT

There is some local speculation on the name of the new team down here:

The Miami Panthers

This was a name that Huizenga favored for the baseball team, but couldn't use
due to some conflict.

As long as they don't use an abstract noun (Heat) I'll be happy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Joe Lundy           Encore Computer Corporation, 6901 W. Sunrise Blvd.    |
| jlundy@encore.com   Mail Stop 811, Ft. Lauderdale, FL  33313-4499         |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey