From: hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.org (Bill Hardman)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: PV equation
Keywords: bald lies
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 10:22:47 PST
Reply-To: hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.org (Bill Hardman)
Distribution: world
Organization: Bark At The Moon Productions

nistuk@unixg.ubc.ca (Richard Nistuk) writes:

> 
> But Bill Hardman, you still haven't replied to most of the comments in 
> *this* post!  Your assertion is still a _bald_ lie!

Do you read the articles in this newsgroup, or do you just blindly
babble?  Your statements prove the latter.

> In article <DJ9DuB1w165w@throb.mcws.fidonet.org> hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.o
> >ph36@unixg.ubc.ca (Richard Nistuk) writes:

> >> In article <goD5TB2w165w@throb.mcws.fidonet.org> 
> >> hardman@throb.mcws.fidonet.org (Bill Hardman) writes:
> >> >gisle@ifi.uio.no (Gisle Hannemyr) writes:
> >> [deleted: Gisles' summary of what we have learned]
> >> [deleted: A discussion of the "equation", between myself and Bill
> >>  	  Hardman, where Bill demonstrates that he hasn't a clue
> >> 	  what units of measurment are]
> >> [equation for speed deleted]
> 
> Bill, you said:
> 
> >> >Please note that you assigned the unit.  You assigned meters, and
> >> >seconds as the unit measures.  
> 
> this is my reponse:
> 
> >> 	No, PHYSICS assigned the meters and seconds as the units
> >> of measure, _standard_ grade 10 algebra assigned the units.
> >> So what?  Sure, Gisle could have substituted inches for meters
> >> and picoseconds for seconds, a conversion factor is all that's 
> >> required.  What's your point Bill?

>       This is where you should have responded, Bill!

The unit of measurement is assigned by the person doing the
equation, usually the units that the person is familiar with.

> >> >> >> O.K. help me out here, Bill, explain the words!!!
> >> >> Bill:
> >> >> > It's not worth my time.
> 
> 	Your statement here is your first cop-out, in this thread.

Didn't you see the reply in my other posting to Gisle?  Your raving
now Richard.

>       Gisle explains why:
> >> >> I final question:
> >> >> Bill, why it is worth your time entering all these discussions, only
> >> >> to bail out every time you meet some real opposition?  You seem to
> >> >> have a more imaginative range of excuses (the "out-gradient" was the
> >> >> best so far) than the cheese salesman in the Monty Phyton "Cheese
> >> >> Shop" skit!
> 
> >> >        When did I use the term out-gradient?
> 
> 	Of course this is another of your standard tricks, selective
> editing.  In the origional post I had made the comment:
> 	Nit pick!
> You should have replied here too Bill.  You are _not_ current...

I don't enter into childish banter.

> >> >        As usual, your observations are flawed.  I have never
> >> >"bailed out" of any discussion.  I have not seen any "real"
> >> >opposition in this newsgroup.
> 
> 	Then why all the bail outs, why the selective editing?

See below.  Review path lines, check site restrictions and
understand the Usenet.

> >>    Where's your response to my post (article 2045; dated: 11 Nov 1992
> >> 00:27:21 GMT)?  Face up to your "real" opposition baby! 
> 
> >The post was never received at this site.
> 
> 	I will repost the article in question, just for you Bill!
> 
> >> 	You are _not_ current.  You _have_ bailed out.  _Your_ assertion 
> >> is a bald lie!
> 
> 	This is still true!
> 
> >If it was received, it was replied to.  That would define current.
> >Where is the lie Richard?
> 
> 	The article you are "responding" to was recieved, wasn't it?  
> You didn't respond to my question, did you?  You are _not_ current...
> 
> >Bill Hardman
> >If you don't have anything nice to say....Say something Rude!!!!
> 
> 	keep that ARC up there Bill!

You failed to keep current in the news group, I answered Gisle's
post on why it would not be feasible to "help" you find your
mis-understood words.  You have still not responded to that post.

The editing is necessary as you have failed to properly edit your
posts and they exceed the 64kb limit of two feed sites and are
promptly trashed up the line before I see most of them.  This
article was not received at this site, just as to follow-up posts
that I had done were not received in Florida, due to their size.

You're raving Richard.  Seek professional help quickly before
society enforces it upon you.

Bill Hardman

------------------------------- :) -----------------------------------
   hardman = hardman@throb.uucp [modem (818) 352-6297]

            h      mM    gs
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology