HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mfroedge@lunatix.uucp (Maxwell Froedge)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: HELP! problems with 2-line phones
Date: 19 Dec 92 15:03:51 GMT
Organization: Lexington Public Access Unix. -KY- (606) 255-9121

The problem its seems is that the phones are reflecting a portion
of the ring voltage back onto the other line....  This is due to
an improperly designed ringer circuit.  You could try running the
line cord around a ferrite bead for noise suppression.  Or to see
just how bad the problem is, turn off the ringers on all the
phones.  If this solves the problem you could try installing
separate ringers.   Also are both lines on the same modular cord?
Most 2 line phones I have seen have one jack for Line 1/Line 2
and another for just Line 2.  You could try keeping one line per
jack.
From: saff@ax.apc.org
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: T1600 in synchronous mode
Date: 14 Dec 92 23:41:00 GMT
Nf-ID: #N:ax:54100003:004:1165
Nf-From: ax.UUCP!saff    Dec 14 15:41:00 1992


Hi all,

I've been trying to put two Telebit T1600 to work in a transparent
synchronous modem over a leased line. I've tried the preset modes, and
fiddled with the parameters a lot, to no success.

What puzzles me is that I couldn't make the modems even try to connect. In
the asynchronous mode, it's just matter of setting the modems, turn they
on and they start to scream happily. In the synchronous mode, I hear no
sound. 

If I plug it in a PC, configure, and then press the T/D button, it starts
to send the tones. Allright, if I turn it off, and the turn it on again,
it goes back to the dead silence.

Note that I am trying to connect them to two dumb devices, so I _must_
have them configured in another equipment. 

Have anybody else done that before ? Any help would be much appreciated ...


Thanks,

Saliel
*****************************************************************************
Saliel Figueira Filho / IBASE-AlterNex | Rua Vicente de Souza, 29, Botafogo
AlterNex system manager                | 22251 Rio de Janeiro RJ
saff@ibase.br/saff@ax.apc.org          | BRASIL
*****************************************************************************
From: mwitt@ogicse.cse.ogi.edu (Mike Witt)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: new Boca ROMs
Date: 15 Dec 92 13:29:09 GMT
Article-I.D.: ogicse.47280
Distribution: world
Organization: Oregon Graduate Institute (formerly OGC), Beaverton, OR


Are these for the internal modem too, or just the external?
From: radel@bach.udel.edu (Todd Radel)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ZyXEL developer's kit
Summary: Here's the lowdown...
Date: 18 Dec 92 01:33:33 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

Well, I called ZyXEL from work today.  I spoke to Nick in the tech
support department.  He said he'd never heard of any proposed developer's
kit, but he said he'd received many calls lately from programmers wanting
some kind of help -- source code samples, utilities, etc.

I told him that we had 15-20 active programmers on the net who were
interested in forming a mailing list to exchange programming information.
He promised to dig up some source code and put it on an FTP site somewhere;
at a minimum, he said he could get C code for playing/recording voice.

He also noted that third-party developers are working on improved versions
of ZFAX for (among others) DOS, Windows, OS/2, UNIX, Amiga, and Mac
platforms.  I told him that those same 15-20 people on the net would
probably be happy to beta-test.  :-)

He has my phone number, and he promised to call me at my office when
he's gotten some stuff together.  He said that a so-called "developer's
kit" may be started sometime soon, but as far as he knows there's nothing
at the moment.

So that's the story.  When he calls back to tell me what kind of support
he can give us, I'll let everyone know.  In the meantime, I'm still waiting
to hear on the mailing list --- hang in there!

__/\__
\    /		Happy holidays to everyone!
/_  _\	
  \/  

-- 
Todd Radel                   | "Hello.  My name is Inigo Montoya.  You killed
Honors CISC undergrad        | my father.  Prepare to die."
University of Delaware       | "STOP SAYING THAT!" -- _The_Princess_Bride_
Call the Politically Incorrect BBS! (302) 837-8088 V.32bis/24hrs Fido 1:150/380
From: kc2x+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kwan-Ju Chen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ZyXEL new rom
Date: 12 Dec 92 12:51:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.Yf_anu200iV0M3HVJr
Organization: Junior, IM - H&SS Track, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA


what's the cheapest way to get new version of rom?  I don't have access
to EPROM burner. Thanks
From: wbe@bbn.com (Winston Edmond)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Pronunciation of ZyXEL
Date: 18 Dec 92 04:54:28
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, MA
	<1gpikkINNkhk@skeena.ucs.ubc.ca> <mckeeveb.724595183@sfu.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: crystal.bbn.com
In-reply-to: mckeeveb@monashee.sfu.ca's message of Thu, 17 Dec 1992 12:26:23 GMT

>BTW:  How does one pronounce the name ZyXel?
							 _
  As if the X were an S and began the second syllable:  Zi'-sell
 -WBE
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster)
Subject: Re: PCMCIA data/fax modems
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:24:39 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix & Internet, NYC

In article <JCRAWFOR.7.724599452@> JCRAWFOR@ (Jim Crawford) writes:
>Does anyone know if the latest generation of PCMCIA 14,400 data/fax modems 
>are available yet?  I'd like to get one for a Toshiba T2200SX, which (I
>think) supports PCMCIA level II.  Also, can someone recommend a small, 
>portable external data/fax modem?  Something about the size of the Telebit 
>QBlazer would be great!  

I believe Megahertz has released their V.32bis/V.17 PCMCIA 2.0 card
already. In fact, I just posted to comp.sys.laptops for any user
feedback.


-- 
_______________________________Mike Schuster________________________________
NY Pub. Access UNIX/Internet: schuster@panix.com | 70346.1745@CompuServe.COM
The Portal (R) System: schuster@shell.portal.com | MCI Mail,GEnie: MSCHUSTER
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: kevin@mpls911.uucp (Kevin Herrboldt)
Subject: Re: Practical Peripherals (modems and fax-modems) ?
Organization: City of Minneapolis Emergency Communications
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 06:50:52 GMT

ajayshah@almaak.usc.edu (Ajay Shah) writes:
> I'm shopping for modems to use with Suns, and it looks like
> PP has a good price edge over the others.  Is there a catch?
> 
> I'm looking at the 9600 baud "standalone" modem.
> 
> Does their 14400 fax/modem work well with the free fax software?
> 
>         -ans.
> -- 
> Ajay Shah, (213)749-8133, ajayshah@rcf.usc.edu

The December issue of MacUser did a comparison of 14.4K fax/modems,
and the Practical Peripherals was one of their favorites.  It
performs well over long-distance and poor lines.  Don't know about
the software, but we just ordered four of the 14.4K fax/modems for
our UNIX machines.

-- 
Kevin Herrboldt                                                 kevin@mpls911
Emergency Communications Center                     ...!mishima!mpls911!kevin
City Hall Room B-911, Mpls, MN  55415
(612) 348-7216
From: braden@lincoln.diag.stratus.com (John Braden)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: V32bis over _very_ noisy lines (HE
Date: 14 Dec 92 18:07:35 GMT
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: lincolnshire.diag.stratus.com

In article <1992Dec11.021112.3522@ssigv.UUCP>, gdonl@sunrise.ssi1.com (Don
Lewis) wrote:
> 
> In article <54100002@ax.apc.org> saff@ax.apc.org writes:
> >One of my users is having problem to connect to our T3000 with V32bis.
> >She is in the Amazon, and the phone lines are *very* noisy. They are using
> >a zoom v32bis (sp?) modem. The modems scream in agony for a few moments,
> >and them die. I don't have the manuals for the Zoom modem, and they are
> >not techinically skilled in the other side. Does anybody knows what
> >problem it can be ? I appreciate any help!
> 
> Your best bet might be to try V.22bis with V.42(bis).  If possible,
> decrease the V.42 packet size.  I couldn't find a documented way of
> doing this in my T3000 manual.  I don't know about the Zoom.
> -- 
> Don "Truck" Lewis              Phone: +1 916 478-8284   Silicon Systems
> Internet: gdonl@ssi1.com       FAX:   +1 916 478-8290   138 New Mohawk Road
> UUCP: {uunet,tektronix!gvgpsa.gvg.tek.com}!ssigv!gdonl  Nevada City, CA  95959

A recent article in MacUser (November '92) indicated that Zoom V32bis
modems
have problems handling attenuation distortion, found typically in rural
areas with long subscriber loops.  They were incapable of negotiating
a connection in this environment.  Other modems with this problem were the
TwinCom 14.4/DF, PSI COMstation 5, and Logicode Quicktel Xeba.  The
Teleglobe
DA3214 and the PSI also had problems with phase jitter and echo as found on
long cross-country lines.  If you need a modem which can handle noisy
lines,
the UDS Motorola V.3229 is outstanding, and the Supra FAXModem V.32bis and
Practical Peripherals PM14400FXSA also did very well.  If you want to keep
trying with the Zoom modems, make sure you have the latest PROM (V1.2)
which
can be obtained free from Zoom customer service (they do answer on the rare
occasion you don't get a busy signal... autodialer recommended).  To check
your PROM revision, type the command "ATI3".

        John Braden
        braden@lincoln.diag.stratus.com
*****************************************************************
"Things change fast in the computer business.  A year is a hell
 of a long time.  It's like a year in a dog's life."
 Tracy Kidder, "The Soul of a New Machine"
*****************************************************************
From: Arthur@cswamp.apana.org.au (Arthur Marsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Distribution: world
Subject: Re: SUPRA BUSY DETECTION (not!)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1992 22:34:09 +1000

On Mon 30 Nov at 00:01 bjorndahl@augustana.ab.ca (3:713/602)
wrote to All:

 b> Actually, sending them a tape of your busy signal sounds
quite logical to 
 b> me.  You really can't expect them to keep a sample of every
PBX in the 
 b> world in their shop, can you?  How do you suppose they are
supposed to 
 b> program their modems to recognize the variety of busy signals
around the
 b> world?

Sampling busy signals sounds like a good idea. I know someone who
makes a hobby of it.

Austel provide information on Australian service tones (including
busy) in their Technical Standard 2, and give references for
CCITT defined service tones. Does the FCC Form 730 Application
Guide provide this information? If not, drop the FCC a line and
ask them to publish a question on service tone specifications in
their Part 68 applicants newsletter, The Billboard.

 * Origin: Camelot Swamp MJCNA, Hawthorndene, Sth Australia
(3:800/812)

Organization: Physics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 12:50:21 -0500 
From: "Valdis J. Zeps" <vz22+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: HELP! ZyXEL on DECserver woes

Hello all,

We have a ZyXEL U-1496E connected to a DECserver 200 mostly for dialup,
but on occasion used for dial-out, as well. For the most part, the setup
listed below works, except for one major problem. If one dials-in to the
modem, and then goes back to local (ie- +++) then reconnecting with ATO
doesn't work. When I look at the lights on the front of the ZyXEL (we have
another modem so I can dial into the server from the same room), I see
that the RTX/STX lights start flickering like mad at the moment that I go to
local mode. This appears to go on indefinitely, but if I walk away from it, 
it appears to restore itself after some amount of time (on the order of 
hours). Has anybody else had this kind of problem? I've tried all kinds of 
settings for the port (ie- modem control, flow control, dsrlogout, etc.) and
for the modem (ie- &s0/1, &h0/3/4, various S registers...) but nothing seems
to change this symptom. I've listed the settings that we have for bith the
server and the modem, any help on this would be greatly appreciated. 

-Valdis Zeps

----------------------------------------------------------------
DECserver 200 settings are:

Port 4:  MODEM

Character Size:            8           Input Speed:       19200
Flow Control:            CTS           Output Speed:      19200
Parity:                 None           Modem Control:   Enabled

Access:              Dynamic           Local Switch:       None
Backward Switch:           {           Name:              MODEM
Break:                 Local           Session Limit:         4
Forward Switch:            }           Type:               Ansi

Preferred Service: None

Authorized Groups:   0
(Current)  Groups:   0

Enabled Characteristics:

Autoprompt,  Broadcast,  DSRlogout,  Input Flow Control,
Loss Notification,  Message Codes,  Output Flow Control,  Ring,
Verification

----------------------------------------------------------------

Modem Settings are:
at&v

Current   Setting.............

 B0   E1   L4   M1   N5   Q0   V1   X5
&B1  &C1  &D3  &G0  &H3  &J0  &K4  &L0  &M0  &N0  &P0  &R1  &S1  &X0  &Y1
*B0  *C0  *D0  *E0  *F0  *G0  *I0  *L0  *M1  *P9  *Q2  *S0

S00=001   S01=000   S02=043   S03=013   S04=010
S05=008   S06=003   S07=020   S08=002   S09=006
S10=007   S11=070   S12=000   S13=000   S14=003
S15=002   S16=000   S17=018   S18=003   S19=000
S20=007   S21=250   S22=000   S23=105   S24=138
S25=000   S26=000   S27=156   S28=068   S29=000
S30=000   S31=017   S32=019   S33=000   S34=030
S35=002   S36=000   S37=000   S38=008   S39=000
S40=000   S41=032   S42=000   S43=000   S44=000
S45=000   S46=000   S47=000   S48=000   S49=000

----------------------------------------------------------------
From: mlaufer@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Matthias Laufer)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: ZyXEL problem in Australia
Date: 16 Dec 1992 16:13:34 GMT
Organization: The University of Western Australia
NNTP-Posting-Host: tartarus.uwa.edu.au
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5


I recently purchased a ZyXEL U-1496E FaxModem in Germany and am now
operating it in Australia. Frequently I encounter a problem when ringing
an Australian number. The ring signal (two short ring tones followed by
a longer pause) is identical to the one in the UK. The modem seems to
interpret this signal as a BUSY signal although the line is actually not
busy. This does not happen all the time, only about 50% of the time. 
Calling a different country with a different ring signal such as Germany
or the USA does not cause any problems, ie. a connection is established
every time. A friend in Germany has experienced the same problem when
calling me in Australia but has no problems when calling within Germany or
countries with a similar ringing signal.
Does anyone know what I can do to solve he problem. Are there different
hardware settings for different countries? The handbook does not mention
anything.
I would be very happy to receive any suggestions.
Thanks in advance,
Matt.

mlaufer@tartarus.uwa.edu.au

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
From: lfm@pgroup.com (Larry Meadows)
Subject: What is a Dowty Trailblazer
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 16:24:19 GMT
Organization: The Portland Group, Portland, OR

Our company has an office in England.  They are using a modem
identified as follows:

Modem details are:

        Make    Dowty Traiblazer

The following information appears on the underside:

        Part    350-0580-000
        Serial  179207

        Board   02      Rev     N
        Issue    4              5

        S/ware  900-0081-0001/H
        issue   900-0080-0001/H


It definitely speaks PEP.  I get good transfer rates when sending
from my modem (tb+, BA5.00 roms).  However, when it is sending
to me, I get terrible transfer rates (like 200 cps).  Does anyone
know anything about this modem?

Here's at&n for the UK modem:

at&n
E1 F1 M1 Q0 T V1 X1 &L0     Version CA4.05E LIB:UK
S00=001 S01=000 S02=043 S03=013 S04=010 S05=008 S06=004 S07=040 S08=004
S09=006
S10=007 S11=075 S12=050
S41=000 S45=000 S47=004 S48=000 S49=000
S50=000 S51=005 S52=002 S53=001 S54=003 S55=000 S56=017 S57=019 S58=002
S59=000
S60=000 S61=045 S62=003 S63=001 S64=000 S65=000 S66=001 S67=000 S68=255
S90=001 S91=001 S92=000 S95=000
S100=000 S101=000 S104=000
S110=255 S111=030 S112=001
S121=000
S150=000 S151=004 S152=001 S153=001 S154=000 S155=000
S160=010 S161=020 S162=002 S163=003 S164=007


Here's at&n for the US tb+:

E0 F1 M1 Q0 P V0 W0 X1 Y0 &P0 &T4     Version BA5.00
S00=001 S01=000 S02=043 S03=013 S04=010 S05=008 S06=002 S07=040 S08=002 S09=006
S10=007 S11=070 S12=050 S18=000 S25=005 S38=000 
S41=000 S45:255 S47=004 S48=000 S49=000
S50=000 S51:005 S52:002         S54:003 S55:003 S56=017 S57=019 S58:002 S59=000
S60=000 S61=150 S62=003 S63=001 S64:001 S65=000 S66:001 S67=000 S68=255 S69=000
S90=000 S91=000 S92=000 S94=001 S95:002 S96=001 
S100=000 S101=000 S102=000 S104=000 S105=001 
S110:001 S111=255 S112=001 
S121=000 S130:000 S131:001 S255=000 
N0:
N1:
N2:
N3:
N4:
N5:
N6:
N7:
N8:
N9:

Thanks in advance.

Larry Meadows
The Portland Group
lfm@pgroup.com

-- 
Larry Meadows		The Portland Group
lfm@pgroup.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: sarnold@andy.bgsu.edu (G. Steve Arnold)
Subject: Re: RE: GATEWAY TELEPATH @ $1
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 05:15:00 GMT

john.navas@uttsbbs.uucp (John Navas) writes:
>  > I did check with an attorney...Gateway's action *are* legal...
> Was the attorney an expert in anti-trust law?
> If the action is lawful, why did Gateway change its practice in
> response to the complaint I filed?  ;-)

	Prolly 'cause u cumplained. Who wants to throw away a potential
customer? Don't be silly, there ain't no law nowhere what sez u can't 
decide who you do and/or do not wanna enter into a contract of sale with.

steve

-- 
   The only difference between a Communist        G. Steve Arnold
   and a Socialist is that the Socialist will     Dept. Math and Stats.
   only confiscate the resources that are         BGSU
   profitable.                                    sarnold@andy.bgsu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: holen@netcom.com (Victor Holen)
Subject: Re: USR Upgrades (Still possible?)
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 08:35:48 GMT

>...
>I called them recently and was informed that this deal lasted only
>through the end of October. The salesperson mentioned, however, that it
>...
Could somebody post (or mail) phone and/or e-mail to UsRobotics
support.
Thanks
-- 
 e-mail:   holen@netcom.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: jimw@octel.com (James Whitehead)
Subject: 16.8k modem's - Hey Scottb
Organization: Octel Communications Inc., Milpitas Ca.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 23:12:34 GMT

Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 11:06:36 PST
From: jimw@octelc.octel.com (James Whitehead)
Message-Id: <9212181906.AA08317@octelc.octel.com>
To: scottb@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com
Subject: Re: Sportster 14.4/16.8
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: Octel Communications Inc., Milpitas Ca.
Cc: 

In article <1992Dec14.161933.8887@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com> you write:
>Hi,
>
>I would think that with both
>modems set to the 16.8 speed, we should see a higher through-put.
>I dont recall the exact modem settings (its at home) but &k1 is set
>&b1 is also set.  The buad speed is locked at 57.6 via the comm 
>software.  Has anyone gotten a higher cps with this type of setup?
>
>
>-- 
>scottb%nw8550@utrcgw.utc.com            |           sdb@rcinet.utc.com

	Hey Scott - It's Jim,
		In this post you mentioned that both modems were set at 16.8k
but I'm curious; when you connected with your friend, did you see a 
"Connect 16.8k" (i.e. you have x4v1 in your init..). A friend of mine has this 
modem as well, and we can't seem to connect at anything higher than 14.4k. We 
are using the same protocol (Telix 3.12) and both ati4's show DS HST..... That'swhy I ask if yours echoed a "connect 16.8k" if so can you post your modem configor e-mail me with it (or even better I can call your modem, try to connect at 16.8k and download your settings at whatever speed it does connect at...) I'm 
still pluggin' away at this and before I die I will succeed. It's not just a 
interest anymore, It's a quest...

	l8tr..

Navy: "It's not just a job - It's a joke!"
Army: "Be all that we want you to be!"
Air Force: "Aim High - and miss!"
Marines: "We're looking for a few good men" - kinda scary huh?


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gally@barsoom.network.com (Jerry Gally)
Subject: zoom 14.4
Originator: gally@barsoom
Organization: Network Systems Corporation
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 14:40:34 GMT

A few weeks back I bought a Zoom 14.4 v.32bis faxmodem. I was at first quite
pleased with its performance, but discovered that 50% of the 2400 baud modems
I tried to connect with were not compatible with my Zoom ... I would appear to
recieve a continuous stream of garbage from the remote modem after connection.
After unsuccessfully dinking with the problem for an extended period,
I decided to contact Zoom for a resolution. 
After dialing the Zoom technical service line repetitively (i.e. at least 50 times) for over 1/2 hour and only getting busy signals, I finally managed
to get through and immediatly got put on hold (long distance toll call from 
Minnesota to Boston) for 45 minutes. I then was basically told that I 
probably had a lemon and that I should exchange it.
While I was on hold for 45 minutes, I was repetitively treated to a recording
that stated Zoom was available to support its customers via Compuserve and
provided a one month free subscription to its customers toward that end.
So I joined Compuserve ... only to discover that I was going to be unable
to submit messages to the Zoom forum until I had recieved my permenant
password via snail-mail (approx 10 days after joining). 
I was, however, allowed to peruse the existing message area where I
noted that several other Zoom 14.4 modem customers were having the exact
same problem I was having.  
I decided that I was not interested in screwing with $300 lemons so
I returned the modem.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: paulp@bu.oz.au (Paul Pyyvaara (ITS))
Subject: WANTED: X, Y and Z modem protocol desc.
Reply-To: paulp@bu.oz.au
Organization: Bond University
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 23:44:41 GMT

Would anyone have a copy or could point me in the right direction of the X, Y and Z modem protocol descriptions as written/edited by Chuck Forsberg.

Thanks,

Paul.
---
===========================================================================
 Paul Pyyvaara                                     e-mail : paulp@bu.oz.au
 Network Programmer                                Phone  : +61 075 951412
 B O N D  U N I V E R S I T Y     Gold Coast, Queensland, 4229 - Australia
From: mitch@nosc.mil (Ray Mitchell)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Digicom & Software, etc. FAX Software
Date: 16 Dec 92 15:24:16 GMT
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, CA


Greetings,

I have noticed something curious and would like the lowdown on it.  I am
considering the purchase of a Digicom Scout+ internal 14.4K mode.  I
notice that Digicom supplies it with the Qmodem modem software and the
Delrina Dosfax and Winfax FAX software.  However, Software, etc. has
put their own cover on the product and has replaced the Delrina FAX
software with the BitFAX FAX software.  I don't know anything about
either so my first question is what are the differences and which is
better.

My initial cynical impression is that the Delrina is probably better
but more expensive.  Software, etc. is, thus, pulling it out, selling
it separately, and substituing the less expensive BitFAX software.
Am I wrong?

Thanks,
Ray Mitchell
mitch@nosc.mil
From: pnor@btma74.nohost.nodomain (Philip Norris)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Source for NS16550 driver under DOS?
Date: 17 Dec 92 16:58:53 GMT
Reply-To: pnor@se.alcbel.be



Hi modem freaks,

Anybody know where I might get PD source for an NS16550 UART driver, running
under DOS?

Thanks in advance.

--
Regards

Philip Norris - pnor@se.alcbel.be
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems