HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: GILMART@LSTC2VM.stortek.com (Paul Gilmartin)
Subject: Re: TCP MVS 2.2.1 24-bit Unhappy Camper
Organization: StorageTek SW Engineering
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:07:08 GMT

In article <IBMTCP-L%92111616414178@PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU>
"Daniel M. Barton" <dmbarton@VNET.IBM.COM> writes:
 
>This new code will verify that a header mailbox address is valid before
>rewriting it.  If the header is not valid (per RFC 822), it will ignore
>that particular header and pass it through the gateway unchanged.
>
>In the example above, since "lastname.first" is a phrase that contains
>a period (which is a special), it must be in quotes to be valid.  Since
>the phrase is not in quotes, SMTP ignores the header, and passes it
>unchanged through the gateway.
>
>Unfortunately, the only solution is to fix the mailer that is sending
>the incorrect headers through the gateway to use proper RFC822 format.
 
I think you have a bug here.  I sure don't read RFC822 that way.
I call your attention to the following passage:
 
     6.2.4.  DOMAIN-DEPENDENT LOCAL STRING
        [ ... ]
 
        This specification treats periods (".") as lexical separators.
        Hence,  their  presence  in  local-parts which are not quoted-
        strings, is detected.   However,  such  occurrences  carry  NO
        semantics.  That is, if a local-part has periods within it, an
        address parser will divide the local-part into several tokens,
        but  the  sequence  of  tokens will be treated as one uninter-
        preted unit.  The sequence  will  be  re-assembled,  when  the
        address is passed outside of the system such as to a mail pro-
        tocol service.
 
        For example, the address:
 
                           First.Last@Registry.Org
 
        is legal and does not require the local-part to be  surrounded
        with  quotation-marks.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Addr: Dept. 471 / 9-137 / Tie line 862 IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
        Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 11:00:26 EST
From:         "John B. Beurket ((914)-945-1460)" <BEURKET@YKTVMV.BITNET>
Subject:      Help with MVS/TCP 2.2.1 LPD Configuration

ref:  Harold Pritchett <HAROLD@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>; Fri, 20 Nov 1992 08:56:57 EST

> We have just installed TCP/IP for MVS 2.2.1.  In configuring the LPSERVE
> address space, the only file I can find is 'tcpip.lpd.config'.  This
> file does not seem to contain the information I need to configure my
> printers.  I am running JES3, and have multiple printers defined, with
> sysout classes from A to Z, multiple forms, remote printers, etc.

> Where/how does one set up the necessary lpd printer defs to allow one
> to use a particular printer with the right sysout class/forms code/etc.

The Installation manual omitted the parameters from the LOCAL statement.
All of the parameters for the NJE statement, except DEST and IDENTIFIER
may also be used on the LOCAL statement. You mat specify the class either
there or on an OUTPUT statement.

John Beurket
TCP/IP Development
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 10:19:34 EST
From:         Mubashir Farooqi <MUBASHIR@IBRDVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Remote printing

We have a remote printer with its own IP address which has a firm-ware
supporting LPD (not host attached). When I defined it in LPD CONFIG
on VM as SERVICE name PRINTER and REMOTE name, LPSERVE did not come up.
How can I define this printer which is host itself?

Mubashir Farooqi
World Bank, HQ
Washington, DC
From: DURA@EVALUN11.BITNET (Fernando Dura)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Installing nameserver v2.2
Date: 17 Nov 92 18:31:14 GMT
Organization: Valencia University (Universitat de Valencia)   SPAIN

Hi all.

We are trying to install nameserver V2.2 in a VM/XA 2.1 with SQL/DS 2.2
and C/370 V2.1.
We have in production nameserver v1.2, also using the same Database.
This production machine has the userid NAMESRV, and we are trying to install
the new version in userid NAMESRV2, and we are having problems.

- When we execute the standar modules (NSACQ,NSTABLE, ec.) we get errors
from SQL which apparently are caused by the userid being other than NAMESRV.
The error obtained is SQL code -805, in the statement
   ACQUIRE PUBLIC DBSPACE NAMESRV2.TCPSPACE


- We modify the source files for this modules (NSACQ CSQL, NSTABLES CSQL, etc.)
run the preprocessing (with NSPREP EXEC) with no errors, and when we get the
C sources; when we compile this, we obtain:

CC NSACQ

ERROR EDC0322 NSACQ    C        A1:403   Type of the parameter  cannot conflict
with previous declaration of function .
INFORMATIONAL EDC0141 NSACQ    C        A1:403   Prototype has type  incomplete
structure sqlca.
INFORMATIONAL EDC0147 NSACQ    C        A1:403   Argument has type structure sql
ca.
ERROR EDC0322 NSACQ    C        A1:515   Type of the parameter sqlca cannot conf
lict with previous declaration of function putsqlca.
INFORMATIONAL EDC0142 NSACQ    C        A1:515   Previous declaration has type
incomplete structure sqlca.
INFORMATIONAL EDC0145 NSACQ    C        A1:515   Redeclaration has type structur
e sqlca.
Ready(00012); T=0.32/0.39 13:43:05

Sometime ago in this list were discussed some problems compiling (and using)
utilities that needed C/370  compiler, but I don't remember nothing related
with DNS.
Anybody can help us ?

Thank you very much


Fernando Dura',  System Analyst   Tel:(346)3864310/311/312/700 Fax:(346)3864200
Valencia University  Computer Center                   Bitnet: dura at evalun11
Dr. Moliner, 50                                      Internet: dura@vm.ci.uv.es
46100 Burjassot                           Hepnet: evalun::dura (or 16530::dura)
Spain                     X400: C=es;A=mensatex;P=iris;O=uv;OU=ci;OU=vm;SN=dura
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 12:32:32 EST
From:         Andy Hooper <HOOPER@QUCDN.QUEENSU.CA>
Subject:      Re: TCP MVS 2.2.1 24-bit Unhappy Camper
              16 Nov 1992 12:53:14 EST from <dmbarton@VNET.IBM.COM>

>In the example above, since "lastname.first" is a phrase that contains
>a period (which is a special), it must be in quotes to be valid.  Since
>the phrase is not in quotes, SMTP ignores the header, and passes it
>unchanged through the gateway.
>Unfortunately, the only solution is to fix the mailer that is sending
>the incorrect headers through the gateway to use proper RFC822 format.

This violation of RFC822 syntax (periods in an unquoted "word") is so
widespread that any software which holds strictly to the rule is just
spitting into the wind. People are accustomed to putting a period after
their initials or Mr./Dr./Prof./etc. and a lot of mail software doesn't
bother to check if the text should have quotes.

Andy Hooper
From: HONACKI@CCSTAFF.CC.UKANS.EDU (Jim Honacki)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Re: TCP MVS 221 FREEPOOL Buffer Utilization - 24bit mode
Date: 23 Nov 92 21:46:36 GMT
Reply-To: Honacki@UKANVAX
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: IBMTCP-L@PUCC.BITNET
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.1c R5.

>       These are interesting numbers.
>
> ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> I thought you would like to know what our TCP buffer utilization
> was like on our maximum usage day (114 simultaneous inbound TN3270):
>
> Telnet Server
> SMTP Client/Server
> FTP Client
> one test Socket App
>
>  Object       Used+
>  ======       ====
>  ACB            37
>  CCB            12
>  Dat buf        27
>  Sm dat buf    126
>  Tiny dat buf    0
>  Env            18
>  Lrg env        14
>  RCB             2
>  SCB            19
>  SKCB            1
>  TCB           124
>  UCB             2
>
> -Values represents maximum used within the object at any one time,
>  *independently* of one another (calculated by subtracting "lo-water"
>  from "#-alloc" when observing multiple NETSTAT POOLSIZE output after a
>  couple of days of operation (but not necessarily continuous).
>

Dave,

This looks like what we see when everything is going well.  I believe that it
is the ENV category that drops to 0 from 2500 when the System stops
functioning.  Are there other buffer interactions/relationships going on that
provide us with clues.  I note that, at PSU, PA, the small data buffers and
TCB are both high, but I do not know how they relate.___________________________
   ___________________________________________

Jim Honacki                       Internet: Honacki@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Networking                        Bitnet:   Honacki@ukanvm.bitnet
University of Kansas              Phone:    913/864-0356
Lawrence, KS  66045               Fax:      913/864-0485
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 06:27:50 EST
From:         Mimi Zohar <ZOHAR@YKTVMV.BITNET>
Subject:      installing name server

You shouldn't have to recompile and relink any of the name server
code to be able to execute it from a userid other than namesrv.
To execute nsacq, nsdbload, nstable, and nsmain you must grant
the new userid authorization.  So, from ISQL connect to userid
namesrv and issue a grant execute for each access module.

The new userid will not be able to use the same SQL tables as
namesrv.  Each name server uses its own set of tables with the
userid as the table owner.

Mimi Zohar
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 12:03:07 MEZ
From:         Ernst-Axel Knabbe <R01KNA@DHHDESY3.BITNET>
Subject: re: mvs netstat (no, not again!) ... all connection_number

> Peter Weiss writes:
> > What I feel has been omitted from the discussion is my perceived need
> > for a CONNECTION_NUMBER operand of NETSTAT ALL (same syntax as NETSTAT
> > DROP).
>
> Do others feel that this is necessary as well?  If you could specify that
> you wanted NETSTAT output only for a specific userid, would being able to
> request information by connection be useful as well?
>
> Bill Rubin
> IBM TJ Watson Research

First of aware
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: U.S. Dept. of Energy
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:48:22 EST
From:         Thomas Kern <U8803KT@VM1.HQADMIN.DOE.GOV>
Subject:      search

//  JOB Echo=yes
Database Search DD=Rules
//Rules DD *
Search LPR and TN3270 in IBMTCP-l
Index
Print
/*
From: ELINSKY@YKTVMV.BITNET (Jay Elinsky)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Re: FIN-WAIT-2
Date: 17 Nov 92 22:31:10 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Addr: IBM, T.J. Watson Research Center Yorktown Heights,
        NY  10598 Phone (914)945-1869  Tieline 862-1869

Ref:  Your note of Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:35:00 EST

> Having reviewed the following notes in the ibmtcp-l notebook archive,
> it still is not clear to me why TIMEMARK does not cleanup the
> FIN-WAIT-2.

TIMEMARK causes Telnet server to send something (a timing mark negotiation
which is basically a no-op) periodically, to induce TCP to recognize if the
remote host has gone away or lost its memory of the connection.  FIN-WAIT-2
means that Telnet server has issued a 1-way close on the connection.  It
can't send timing mark negotiations or anything else after a 1-way close.

                                       Jay Elinsky
                                       IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
                                       Yorktown Heights, NY
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:03:21 WET
From:         Daniel Pellet <PELLET@CGEUGE11.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: MVS TCP/IP FTP to/from 3420 tape drive
              19 Nov 1992 12:32:29 EST from <HAROLD@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>

On Thu, 19 Nov 1992 12:32:29 EST Harold Pritchett said:
>Does anyone know if it is possible, and if so, how to do an FTP file
>transfer directly to/from a tape?

Yes, some times ago there was TCP/IP modifications for VM HAL product V1.
That was the work from COLUMBIA or CORNELL
Hope this helps. Daniel.
>
>We would like to be able to use our MVS system with it's farm of tape
>drives with full time operator support as a offline data storage
>facility for our UNIX users.  In many cases, the space is not available
>on the MVS DASD for a copy of this data.  It would be nice to be
>able to FTP directly to/from the tape.
>
>If this can be done in batch on the MVS system, that's fine.
>
>Harold
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 13:40:00 EST
From:         "George_J.Haddad" <GEORGEH@MSU.BITNET>
Subject:      rexecd question


I'm trying to bring up REXECD for FAL2.2 and am experiencing the same
symptom (a trace showed me I was hanging in the SLAVE while executing
'waitdev lcon' - an OCO non-mapped module near as I can tell. I've
got an incident open with IBM TCP level II right now and am waiting
to hear back !
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 12:17:44 MEZ
From:         Ernst-Axel Knabbe <R01KNA@DHHDESY3.BITNET>
Subject: re: mvs netstat (no, not again!) ... all connection_number

> Peter Weiss writes:
> > What I feel has been omitted from the discussion is my perceived need
> > for a CONNECTION_NUMBER operand of NETSTAT ALL (same syntax as NETSTAT
> > DROP).
>
> Do others feel that this is necessary as well?  If you could specify that
> you wanted NETSTAT output only for a specific userid, would being able to
> request information by connection be useful as well?
>
> Bill Rubin
> IBM TJ Watson Research

First of all, under MVS, NETSTAT does not tell me the TSO userid for
telnet login from the outside. Before being able to specify a single
userid, I would appreciate to obtain at all  userid information for
telnet login to TSO. It would be valuable to have the userid for
the FTP telnet control session as well. Only after that I would plead
for connection number oriented info via NETSTAT. It would also be
quite handy if one could have NETSTAT show a list of connections
selected by status, for instance CLOSE-WAIT. By this one would avoid
to list all connections each time the operator does a DROP conn# .

Axel Knabbe, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Group R1
From: PMW1@PSUVM.BITNET (Peter M. Weiss +1 814 863 1843)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: TCP/IP For MVS Messages and Codes
Date: 18 Nov 92 20:15:00 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

Does any one know the secret to looking up a "TCP" message in
the above M&C manual?

Or, what is the meaning of:

     TCPREQ036I ClientSend VMCF receive fails for "userid"

I don't see the value of organizing NUMBERED messages by product
within the single manual, especially when there there is no index
of prefix/infix strings to chapters.  From p. vii:

   This book is organized by chapter and then by function within
   each chapter.  Messages associated with each function are sorted
   by message number if the message has a number.  Otherise, the
   messages are listed alphabetically.

   If the message you are looking for has a message number, that
   section of the manual is sorted by message number.  However, in
   some cases, you may find that the message you are looking for has
   a message number associated with it, but the functional section
   does not.  In this case, do not use the message number for
   searching; search for the message alphabetically.  If the
   functional section contains messages both with and without
   message numbers, the messages with message numbers are listed in
   numerical order in the beginning of the sction, and the messages
   without message numbers are listed in alphabetical order at the
   end of the session.

/Pete (pmw1@psuvm.psu.edu)
--
Peter M. Weiss                     | not affiliated with psuvm.psu.edu|psuvm
31 Shields Bldg -- Penn State Univ.| "Connectivity is more than a Connection"
University Park, PA USA 16802-1202 | E. Michael Staman, _The Circuit_, Apr 92
From: COURCOUL@VMTECQRO.QRO.ITESM.MX (Juan M. Courcoul)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: IBM FAL 2.2: updates required ?
Date: 18 Nov 92 23:19:17 GMT
Organization: Instituto Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Queretaro
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

Greetings, colleagues:

The delivery service dropped off a box today containing our update of
5735-FAL, aka IBM TCP/IP for VM. According to the shipping list and the
program directory, this is Version 2 Release 2: Basic, Text, Samples, NFS,
Softcopy and Kerberos. The six tapes (four pertaining to the stock
TCP/IP & NFS, the other two containing the Kerberos) each say
Rel: 02/00/00. Nothing remotely resembling a PUT tape was found within.

Now, is this the latest there is ? Is there any additional service I should
request ?

We are running a 9377, with both an Ethernet integrated adapter (which we
don't currently use) and an 8232 LAN Channel Station left over from our
previous 4381 machine (which I've preferred to use instead). Can I happily
take the jump and install 2.2, or are there any gotchas I should be careful
with ?

Thanks in advance for any and all tips, help and observations.

Juan Courcoul

P.S. I'm fairly itching to get this going and be able to enjoy the zillion
     RXSOCKET goodies available all over !
From: TKSSTEVE@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU (Steven P. Roder)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: re: VMCF SEND FAILS
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:32:43 GMT
Organization: State University of New York at Buffalo
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
              18 Nov 1992 19:01:45 GMT from <SY07@I1.PH.GLA.AC.UK>

On Wed, 18 Nov 1992 19:01:45 GMT SY07 at GWIA Alan J.Flavell said:
>
>The worst faults are often the simplest (an insecure cable plug is by
>no means unknown, and I speak from personal experience, not in any
>way meaning to throw doubt on your ability in these matters): it can
>be very embarassing to discover that kind of fault after calling the
>various equipment suppliers.  Quite apart from the waste of time and
>user outage.  So, get that PC hooked up "as an independent witness".
>
Our networking group once unplugged our 3172 from the Production net, and
plugged it into the "test" net during test time, and never put it back.


Steve Roder
(tkssteve@ubvm.bitnet | tkssteve@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu | (716)645-3564
From: aroby@andersen.co.uk (Tony Roby)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Subject: Re: MVS TCP/IP V2: FTP under CICS?
Date: 16 Nov 92 14:29:37 GMT
Organization: Andersen Consulting (UK Practice)

rgoldstone@OAVAX.CSUCHICO.EDU (Robin, Girl Wonder) writes:

>We are looking at purchasing TCP/IP version 2 for our MVS system.  One of the
>capabilities we need is FTP file transfer from under CICS.  When I first 
>investigated this software about a year ago, I was told by IBM that there
>would be "hooks" to support FTP under CICS, but that an actual FTP client
>for CICS was not included.  At least, that is what I *think* I was told!
>Now that version 2 has been out for a while, I am wondering if an FTP client
>for CICS is available, either from IBM or from any other source.

AFAIK there is no FTP clinet for CICS.  It wouldn't be too difficult to
write one though.  I have some VERY basic source for an FTP client (it
doesn't write received files to disk !).  Otherwise look at the KA9Q
package by Phil Karn;  that's where I pinched the basic FTP source from.

Tony
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
App-Message-Id: <94108091112991/1232734@OAX>
Msg-Class: ALL-IN-1 V2.4 PBL8C3  7-JUN-1990
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 07:56:01 -0500
From:         Charles D Fisher <fishercd@ORNL.GOV>
Subject:      Re: SNMPD and EDESTADDRREQ

We ran into the same thing trying to respond to queries from the Spectrum
management package running on a Sun workstation.  I forget the exact number,
but the Sun wants the response sent to a port that the SNMPD code can't
support.  I think it was port 65536, but I'm away from my desk and don't have
that information handy.  The Sun is within the constraints of the relevent RFC,
IBM's SNMPD is not.

PN26332 addresses this problem.  At last look, PTF's UN30122/UN30123 were still
open.  Check with IBM for the status...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles D. Fisher                      |  Internet:  cdf@ornl.gov
Building 4500N, MS-6271                |  Bitnet:    cdf@ornlstc
Oak Ridge National Laboratory          |
P.O. Box 2008                          |  Phone:     615-574-8150
Oak Ridge, Tn.     37831               |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 12:32:29 EST
From:         Harold Pritchett <HAROLD@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
Subject:      MVS TCP/IP FTP to/from 3420 tape drive

Does anyone know if it is possible, and if so, how to do an FTP file
transfer directly to/from a tape?

We would like to be able to use our MVS system with it's farm of tape
drives with full time operator support as a offline data storage
facility for our UNIX users.  In many cases, the space is not available
on the MVS DASD for a copy of this data.  It would be nice to be
able to FTP directly to/from the tape.

If this can be done in batch on the MVS system, that's fine.

Harold
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 12:53:14 EST
From:         "Daniel M. Barton" <dmbarton@VNET.IBM.COM>
Subject:      TCP MVS 2.2.1 24-bit Unhappy Camper

> After using the above for approx. 2 weeks, I'm an unhappy camper
> (we were running 2.0.1 previously) --
>
> 1)  SMTP rewrite rules (either default, or the modified one posted
>     earlier this year) don't work for the following syntax
>
>      cc:   lastname.first  <userid@NJEHostName>
>
>   though it does get written correctly for
>
>      cc:   lastname_first  <userid@NJEHostName>
>
>   Level II contacted

TCP/IP V2R2 (both VM and MVS), included extensive changes in SMTP in
how it rewrites headers of outbound mail.  Headers are now written per
the rules in the SMTP RULES file (user exit), instead of simple hard
coded rules in SMTP.

This new code will verify that a header mailbox address is valid before
rewriting it.  If the header is not valid (per RFC 822), it will ignore
that particular header and pass it through the gateway unchanged.

In the example above, since "lastname.first" is a phrase that contains
a period (which is a special), it must be in quotes to be valid.  Since
the phrase is not in quotes, SMTP ignores the header, and passes it
unchanged through the gateway.

Unfortunately, the only solution is to fix the mailer that is sending
the incorrect headers through the gateway to use proper RFC822 format.

The second example above will work, since the underscore is not a
special character.  The string "lastname_first" becomes a single atom
without specials, and does not require quotes around it.  It may be
easier for you to use this format than to try and fix the mailer.

Regards,

Daniel



=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====-=====

Daniel M. Barton                 Internet:  dmbarton@vnet.ibm.com
TCP/IP Development
IBM Research Triangle Park, NC  USA
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibmtcp-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 13:47:06 CST
From:         David E Boyes <dboyes@IS.RICE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: MVS TCP/IP FTP to/from 3420 tape drive
              20, 92 12:51 pm

> WDSF/VM will become DFDSM/VM.  DFSMS/VM FL221 will use DFDSM
> for ML2 storage.

Thanks for catching the acronym slip. DFDSM is correct. Mea culpa.

> /ahw
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU