From: v104n55k@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (David I Schwartz)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.censorship,alt.discrimination,soc.history,sci.research,alt.activism
Subject: Re: Want facts?  "WHO RUNS THE MEDIA?  The Alarming Facts"
Date: 6 Apr 92 19:59:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <gate.Be5RiB1w164w@b-cpu.UUCP>, ralphw@b-cpu.UUCP (Ralph Winston) writes...
> 
>[The following was written approx. 1985.  While reading it, please keep
>in mind that minority racism and majority racism are equally wrong.]
> 
>                             ^^^^^^^^^^
>        Pay attention to that this time, Mr. Shein and company!
> 
> 
>                          WHO RUNS THE MEDIA?
>                          The Alarming Facts
> 
[stuff del]
>industry.  As a result, few Americans outside the media establishment
>are aware of the Jewish hegemony in the media.
> 
Few are aware because there is none you fool!

>                         Television and Radio
> 
>     Television and radio are our primary sources of information about
>the daily events and concerns of the world.  Through TV and radio we
>are bombarded at home, in our autos, and at work with a constant stream
>of information and news.  Additionally, the entertainment of movies and
>dramatic series often has both subtle and overt political and social
>messages.  Even comedy is not immune from this propagandizing.
> 
>     Every American is now familiar, for example, with the Archie
>Bunker white stereotype.  A crude, rude, and unreasoning Archie Bunker

I fail to see any justification in this statement. Are you sure "every"
American is portrayed this way? Let's see the figures! 

>is used to show the supposed immorality of opposing gun control,
>welfare, unrestricted immigration, and race-mixing.  At the same time,
>the show he appears in promotes minority racism and Zionism.  The
>average American young person watches over 16,000 hours of television
>by the time he is 18.  Certainly, TV has a dramatic influence on our
>attitudes, mores, and even our political philosophies.
> 
>     The three major television networks are ABC, CBS, and NBC.  ABC is
>run by Leonard Goldenson who has been CEO and Chairman of the Board
>since 1953. CBS was lead by William Paley since 1948.  He still has
>much stock and influence, but was replaced as chairman by Thomas Wyman.
> Heading the CBS-TV division is James Rosenfeld.  NBC is a subsidiary
>of RCA, founded by David Sarnoff, who became chairman of its board of
>directors in 1947.  The year 1970 saw the succession of his son to the
>post until 1975.  It is still controlled by the Sarnoff family.  NBC
>has seen a succession of different chairmen, including Herb Schlosser
>and Fred Silverman.  Currently, Grant Tinker is chairman of RCA's
>network subsidiary, NBC.  Tinker is the only Gentile of all those
>mentioned.
> 
>[Two pictures appear side-by-side in the booklet, with the captions
>"ABC BOSS GOLDENSON" and "CBS BOSS PALEY".]
> 
>     One should not, however, get the impression that NBC is dominated
>by Gentiles.  Six out of the 12 executive vice-presidents are Jews. 
>The RCA treasurer, Melvin Cornfeld, and the controller, Stanley
>Roseberry, are also Jews.  The vice-chairman of NBC is Irwin
>Segelstein, and the former vice chairman, Richard Salant, is "General
>Adviser" to NBC's top management. Furthermore, the president of NBC
>News is Rueven Frank -- also a Jew.

What does this prove? Nearly 95% of the US is run by gentiles...is this a
conspiracy?

>                             Newspapers
> 
>     Sixty-two million newspapers are sold each day.  They are divided
>into 1,745 different publications.  One might expect sheer numbers to
>preclude minority control, but the facts prove otherwise.
> 
>     More than half of the major dailies in America are under direct
>control or indirect control of Jews, a minority that makes up only 2.9%
>of the population.  This situation has come about as a consequence of
>the complete dependence of all papers on advertising revenue.  In every
>major city Jews have predominance in the mercantile trade, which
>includes department stores, large furniture outlets, discount stores,
>etc.  When large advertisers choose to favor one newspaper over another
>with their business, that newspaper prospers, and its competitors
>suffer.  As Jewish mercantile power has increased there has been a
>steady decline both in the numbers of newspapers in major cities along
>with a decline in competing Gentile papers -- primarily as a result of
>selective advertising by Jewish merchants.

I still see delusions that remain unsubstantiated: which merchants? what
percent? 

[more unsubstantiated ravings deleted]
> 
>     Most of the time when I bring out the facts of Jewish media
>control in interviews, the host tries to deny Jewish dominance of the
>media.  They say, "The Jews don't really dominate American media," or,
>"You must be a conspiracy nut," (even though I never use the word
>conspiracy).  I tell them that it doesn't matter whether or not a
>conspiracy has caused this situation to develop, the point is that the
>present situation is very dangerous to this country and I proceed to
>give the irrefutable facts of Jewish domination of mass media in
>America.

How are Jews dangerous? I fail to see what we would do to you.
> 
>     Of course, the facts are impossible to disprove, so the announcers
>then shift the argument and say, "So what if the Jews control the
>media; why is that so bad?"
> 
>     If at the beginning of the conversation I would have asked the
>announcer if he thought it would be a good thing if the Arabs had
>practically a monopoly on our media, he would have certainly emoted
>about the inherent dangers of such to our basic constitutional
>liberties and freedoms.  Yet, the Jews are certainly the most
>chauvinistic people on earth.  No other race on earth constantly refers
>to itself as the chosen people of God.  The term "chosen people" has
>become synonymous with Jews.  No people more ardently support a nation
>in which most of them don't reside.  Jews residing in every nation of
>the world finance and support Israel.

We are the most chauvinistic? Based on what? Take a look at all religions:
I do believe they all declare that they are "correct" in their beliefs
which implies others aren't. Sounds chauvanistic to me, but this means
you are condemning ALL religion.

> 
>     What's more, no people have made more of a shrine or icon out of
>persecution and suffering than the Jews.  Their literature and
>teachings are overflowing with tales of woe their ancestors experienced
>at the hands of every people with whom they resided.  The allegation of
>the six million has become the central, most important event of the
>20th century to the Jews, and because of their media domination, also
>to us.  Ask any American high school student how many Jews perished in
>World War II and you'll get an immediate, definite response.  Then ask
>him how many Americans died in that war and all you'll see is a blank
>face.

You can't change history, or can you? You and your kind refuse to join
reality because the facts can not conform to your twisted views.

Blame our school system (which by the way, RARELY discusses anything
dealing with Jewish history or culture) if students don't know enough.

> 
>     Chronic recital of persecution of Jews by Gentiles cannot help but
>instill a deep resentment in Jews against Gentiles manifested in subtle
>and overt actions against us.  Lately, they have begun blaming all
>Gentiles for the Holocaust.  Many leading Jewish authors have chastised

No, we blame the Nazis. 

>America for not declaring war on Germany immediately upon Hitler's
>ascension to power.

There are many who blame Europe for not stopping him sooner.

> 
>     So, we face a media controlled by a chauvinistic, highly organized
>minority, a minority that harbors animosity against us for both real
>and imagined wrongs.  Their chauvinism is expressed in media bias
>especially when they feel they have their direct interests at stake.

Since your arguments are founded on discounting historical facts,
you are on some shakey ground.

> 
>     Take for example the Israel-Arab conflict.  The media tells us
>that Israel is the only real democracy in the Middle East, when the
>truth is that over a million Arabs in Israel don't have the right to
>vote, or any rights of citizenship.
> 
>     The media is constantly telling us about Arab terrorism, when the
>state of Israel was founded by terror.  Through terrorism and massacres

Bullshit! Check your history books to see who started the fighting. 

>of civilians, the Jews drove millions of Arabs out of the land that now
>comprises Israel. Menachem Begin as head of an Israeli terrorist
>organization helped bomb the King David Hotel in Jerusalem (killing
>dozens) and masterminded the massacre at Deir Yassin, where over 250
>mostly women and children were murdered.  News of this massacre was
>then publicized and played up in order to cause panic among the Arabs
>and cause a mass exodus from Palestine.
> 
>     In the latest invasion of Lebanon, over one-half million people
>were made homeless and 10,000 civilians were killed.  During the
>invasion and occupation, while Israeli airplanes were bombing villages,
>schools, and hospitals, killing thousands, the three networks' news
>constantly referred to the Palestinian victims as terrorists while
>never referring to the attackers as other than soldiers.

Southern Lebanon was a PLO base for terrorist activities.  Why didn't
they stop committing acts of terrorism?

> 
>[A picture appears with the caption, "Palestinians sift through rubble
>of home destroyed by made-in-America Israeli jets."]
> 
>     Of course, the pro-Zionist position of the U.S. government has
>cost us dearly in the Mideast.  We have alienated Arab states, many of
>which have resources vital to the well-being of America, and in turn
>helped the communist cause by pushing Arabs to closer positions with
>the Soviet Union, our worst enemy.  We spend billions in aid each year

A little outdated now huh?.........

>to Israel which could certainly have been put to better use in our own
>nation.  With each passing day we increase the involvement of our own
>forces in the region which may get America into another catastrophic
>war.
> 
>     Of course, when one considers that only 2.9% of the population
>controls the mass media in America it's easy to see why we can develop
>a policy that is in direct contradiction to the best interests of 97.1%
>of the American people. When one learns the real masters of the media,
>many things begin to fall into place and become clear.  The flood of
>movies, TV docudramas, news stories, books, and magazine articles about
>the Holocaust makes perfect sense. Perhaps they can convince the
>American people to put Israel's interests over our own, and certainly,
>it immunizes them from serious opposition to their control of the
>media.
> 
>     They have effectively used their media power to suppress awareness
>of their media domination and to deify themselves in the minds of many
>Americans while at the same time demonize (or Hitlerize) anyone who
>dares to question the benevolence of Jewish domination.
>
I fail to see any effects of this "media power." On the contrary, there
tends to be a lack of anything Jewish on TV for instance (how many
Jewish characters are there in ANY TV show hm?).

>     The next tactic talkshow hosts resort to is to intone, "Well, if
>the Jews dominate the media it just shows they are more talented.  They
>deserve to, for isn't that the nature of our free enterprise system?"
> 
>     At that point, I ask the host if he has ever in his lifetime
>watched TV, for if he had, how could any living being believe that the
>bulk of what one sees on TV is produced by talent?  Furthermore, is it
>uplifting, does it instill in our youth the value system of our fathers
>or a potpourri of sex, violence, and inanity?
> 
>     If TV is produced by the most talented, I feel sorry for the rest
>of us! In the last quarter of a century we have had the opportunity to
>see just what kind of effect the outpouring of this new literati have
>had on the American people.  A generation has grown up weaned on Dr.
>Benjamin Spock and TV and been "educated" by the thrust of Jewish
>literature.  Hand-in-hand with this cultural changing of the guard, we
>have seen more violence, suicide, mental illness, and moral decadence. 
>Has the "Light unto the nations" been a beacon of hope or a glaring
>failure?

What societal degradation? Take a look at Mideval history and you tell
me which society is more corrupt.  If anything, we've improved...we have
public hospitals, a court system, welfare, charity, etc. Where are the
days of public hangings and torture fests?

You are now attacking a more general institution, a typical tactic
of neo-fascist totalitarians. Get of the intelligent and the uneducated
masses will follow.

> 
>     And, really now, are we honestly expected to believe that 2.9% of
>the population produces more artistic, literary talent in the broadcast
>industry than the other 97.1%?  Of course, we Gentiles are obviously
>bereft of talent. Twain, Hemingway, Tennyson, Shakespeare, and a
>thousand more must have all been Jews!  In actual fact, of course, Jews
>have constituted less than 1% of the great writers and playwrights of
>English and European literature, but now we are supposed to believe
>that this 2.9% produces the most talent.
> 
>     In the Hollywood/New York axis of media, it's not what you know
>but who you know.  Increasingly, the elite of American media is
>becoming a country club with very strict admissions policies, the
>primary one being having a Jewish mother.

Where are your facts? I want to see hiring/firing and application
statistics!

> 
>     Racism and finances have given the Jewish minority its preeminent
>power in media.  The same racism that causes many Jewish merchants to
>bring all their newspaper advertising to the Jewish-owned daily rather
>than the Gentile-owned one.  When a Jewish executive of a major studio
>needs a writer and he has fifteen Gentile applicants and a Jewish one,
>who will invariably get the job? One can't forget that Jews have been
>taught that their survival is tenuous and demand unity.  Over the years
>the cumulative effect of financial power and such favoritism, while the
>Majority is taught to think in terms of the individual, has resulted in
>the capturing of the American media establishment by Zionists.
> 
>----------
> 
>     I hope you found this article to be thought-provoking and
>informative.  If you did, be SURE not to miss the message right after
>this one!  (Will the dissident Jews of the JPFO will be called
>"anti-Semites", as I, George Bush, and countless others have been???)
> 
>                                Ralph Winston
> 
>-.-

Ralph, why do you lie? Everything you have said has been said before in
different ages by anti-semites.  You are telling us that even though 
everything you say folows anti-semitic lines you are not?

Ralph, do something to prove you are NOT anti-semitic. No one believes
you except your "pals" at B-CPU (whereever the hell that is).


>Banished CPU supports FREEDOM OF SPEECH.  Currently no fees.
>CALL:  +1(503) 232-6566 (8N1, v.32/42/bis) or +1(503) 232-5783 (8N1)
>UUCP:  Path (..twiki!b-cpu) "ELIMINATED" BY ZIONIST THOUGHT POLICE!!!
>Users of Banished CPU are solely responsible for their actions.

I have been curious...do these "Zionist Thought Police" suck your
thoughts out when you sleep?  Where are they?  Let's join reality
B-CPU and ask why you hate so much.


Many stupid neo-fascists will be laughed at....

    HAHA! I am laughing at you B-CPU!

David I. Schwartz
(I am not afraid of saying my REAL name, "Ralph")
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy