HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Organization: Houses of the Holy
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 22:29:54 GMT

In article <Bx9DKG.Dwt@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v130pwbq@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
> I was wondering if anyone knows who the last man to rush for 2,000 yards was?
> I think it was Dickerson but i'm not sure. The reason i'm asking is that at

I think only two players have gone over the 2,000 yd. rushing mark
in the NFL (modern day).  Dickerson had about 2,196 (or so) in '86
and OJ had 2,004.  The difference is that OJ got his in a 14 game
season while Dickerson had 16 games.  Knowing how pathetic most of
the Bills teams on which OJ played were one wonders about the importance
of the running game (new thread).


-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Ditka vs. Obnoxious Fan
Date: 6 Nov 92 16:24:00 GMT
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

Heard on ESPN:

Last night, when Mike Ditka was doing a guest spot on a cal in show, someone
called in and refered to Ditka as a macho baby. Ditka reply was pure Ditka,
he gave out his office address and invited the caller to stop hiding behind
the microphone and come out so that Ditka could "whoop his ass". The audience
seemed to behind Ditka on this one.

satish nair
go giants
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: daled@meaddata.com (Dale Drummond)
Subject: Bengals release Brennan
Organization: Mead Data Central, Dayton OH
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 13:42:04 GMT
Distribution: usa

The Cincinnati Bengals release wide receiver Brian Brennan to make room
on the roster for wide receiver Reggie Rembert.  I was surprised by this.
I thought they would release Jeff Query, who hasn't contributed much
to the offense.  I think age was the factor, with Brennan being the oldest
of the Bengals receivers.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dale Drummond          		"Well, no use crying over 
daled@meaddata.com		 spilled mitochondria." -- Ren
...!uunet!meaddata!daled		
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ric@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (ricardo.g.irvin)
Subject: Re: They might be faking it...
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 21:34:23 GMT

In article <910427m.63.721319824@ace.acadiau.ca> 910427m@ace.acadiau.ca (JASON MATTHEW MCDONALD) writes:
>
>...
...
>Bengels have the ball on or about their 45 yard line. 
>It's fourth down.
>1 to go.
>The Bengals line up to go for it.
>The ever so intelligent ESPN reporter says;
>'They're going to go for it, or at least fake it'
>
>FAKE IT?????  What the hell does FAKE IT mean.  How the HELL to you fake 
>going on a fourth down?  I don't know, maybe this guy sees something I don'
>t.  But if you ask me, it's just plain stupidity.

Jason, maybe by "fake it" he ment the Bengals were trying to draw the 
defense offsides, thus getting(5 yard penalty) a automatic first down.



			RIC. IRVIN
			AT&T BELL LABORATORIES.

"TOUCHDOWN !!!! ... just kidding Dad! " my son at 18 months.

"In football, good hitting usually beats good pitching."

"... Lawrence Taylor was all over him... like syrup on pancakes." John Madden.

"...This Game is being broadcast in stereo..." Pat Summerall.
"...What does spit sound like in stereo? "	John Madden.

			PEACE.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rscott@ra.csc.ti.com (Roderick Scott)
Subject: Re: I'm gonna rip Greg Gumble's head off!!!
Organization: Texas Instruments
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 16:31:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov8.213420.26915@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>In article <BxFInv.w0@news.cso.uiuc.edu> mfv23060@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Maurice F. Vallejo) writes:
>>	AAAARRRRGGGGGG,  CBS is on my shit list.  CBS shows the first 
>>half of the Cowboy/Lions and some of the third quarter.  Then all of a
>>sudden they decide to switch over to the Giant/Packers game,  cause

Get A Satellite Dish... Any Game .. Any Time..

>>the Cowboy's had their game wrapped up.  WHAT THE HELL!!  Hello!
>>The Giants killed the Packers & CBS doesn't mention the Cowboy/Loins game
>>at all.  I waited three years for the Cowboys to get really good, and they
>>switch over to a stupid sloppy blowout.   ARRRGGGGG.  What is the address 
>>for CBS's sports?  Or better yet, what is Greg's home phone?  
>>	If CBS is going to show a game, show it all the way through.  It is 
>>very frustrating to get into a game, and then wham-bam a different game.
>
>The Lions-Packers game was close until the middle of the 4th quarter.  The
>Cowboys were beating the crap out of the Lions.  The game was over.  That
>is the way TV things work, unless your local team (in your case the Bears)
>is on.  Deal with it.  I can't understand people who get irate when their
>team is blowing out another one, and get upset if they can't see all the
>blowout.  Geeesh.
>-- 
>
>Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu


--
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cowboys steamroll over Lions
Date: 10 Nov 92 16:56:11 GMT
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <BILLMS.92Nov9124150@dip.eecs.umich.edu> billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>In article <2822@devnull.mpd.tandem.com> dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch) writes:
>   Not a whole lot more to say.  Next up is the Rams, at Dallas.
>
>Nice win.  Lions then Rams?  You guys must be getting bored, huh?
>Bill

Well, as a fan, I'm not -- when the Cowboys were ahead 34-3, I nearly bit
the head off of someone who tried to turn to a more interesting game.  But
I'm worried that the players are going to get bored, come out flat, and
lose some games they should win.  It's happened to virtually every other
contender team this year, and the Cowboys are certainly not immune to it.

In fact, I'm afraid of exactly what happened to Philly (IMHO) -- the Cowboys
peaking too soon, and going into the playoffs with nothing left.  Philly
seemed to regain some of their momentum this week, which really worries
me.  (Gee, and they did it without Cunningham.  Funny, that.)  I foresee
the Cowboys getting the bye for the first playoff round, but having to
face either the Redskins or the Eagles in the second round, since they
will perhaps play each other in the first round.

The game I worry the most about:  the one in two weeks at Phoenix.  Not the
Washington game -- I don't think Johnson will have any motivational problems
there.  But Phoenix, IMHO, is the best 3-6 team around, and can be dangerous
at times.  Without LT, I'm not too worried about the Giants.  Without a
defense or a running game, I'm not too worried about the Falcons.  We play
the Bears in Dallas, so that's a pretty sure win.  The other sticking point
is going to be Denver, at Mile High.  If it was in Dallas, I'd be a lot more
confident.  I'm still predicting 13-3, and home field advantage.

Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chris@lightnin.Columbia.NCR.COM ()
Subject: Re: idiotic posts
Organization: NCR Corp, E&M-Columbia, Columbia, SC
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 13:41:40 GMT

> Lots of stuff deleted

>I agree completely.  Tops on the list of idiots are the Bills/Dolphins fans.
>They spew crap like this before the game is played, which is even worse.

   Why do you not say *some* Bills/Dolphins fans?  Not all fans spew garbage
before a game, only *some* do.  Ignorance puts you at the top of the Idiot
list buddy.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Nick Lowery
From: rx84335@mcvax4.d48.lilly.com (BENVENGA MARK J)
Date: 6 Nov 1992 07:59 EST  
Distribution: world,local
Organization: Lilly Research Laboratories
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    Lines: 3

Does anybody know if Nick Lowery is playing this week?
Is Eddie Murray still with the team?

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: tolsen@encore.com (Ted Olsen)
Subject: Re: Countdown to extinction (for Miami)
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 15:47:29 GMT

kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist) writes:

>Only 6 days until the big AFC East game Monday night. It's countdown to
>extinction from the division title for the fish. Oh, wait a minute. The
>Fins are good now. They beat the Dolts. Whoa! Stand back.
>Don't worry Miami, there's always next year.

Question???  What prompted this post?  All the Dolphin fans woofing?? :-)

Ted
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rlehman@watson.ibm.com (Robert C. Lehman)
Subject: Re: LT career ending injury
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 21:29:18 GMT
Distribution: usa
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In article <1992Nov10.202139.26788@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> drums@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (robert.e.wisnack.jr) writes:
>Face it, these guys are role models for kids, they shouldn't be,
>but they are.  And in that regard he stinks.

LT gets paid to play football.  He's done that extremely well.  I
don't recall where he signed on to be a "role model" for anyone, so I
do not believe that you have the right to place that burden upon him.

I could certainly make the argument that football is such a brutal and
violent sport that no one playing it should be anyone's "role model"
but I won't open that can of worms...

From what I have heard about Taylor off the field, he is probably not
someone who I'd hang out with.  Big deal.  He probably wouldn't want
to be my pal either.  However, this doesn't change the fact that he
has been a great player and deserves that label, regardless of your
opinion (or my opinion) of how he conducts his life.

If you don't think football players are good "role models" for your
children, then you should explain that to them, and explain to them
that just because someone is a great player doesn't mean they are a
wonderful person.

-Rob
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: reams@crchh462.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Cary Reams)
Subject: Re: Koontz Computer Predictions - Week 11
Keywords: computer, picks, predictions
Reply-To: reams@bnr.ca
Organization: NT/BNR
Distribution: rec
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 18:38:01 GMT

In article <1261@fozzy.UUCP>, ckoontz@fozzy.UUCP (Carl H. Koontz) writes:
|> Well, I should have known that as soon as I made my picks public I would have
|> a bad week. I was 6-8 last week bringing my yearly total to a still impressive
|> 89-37.
|> 
|> Here are my picks for Week 11:
Here are my picks on these picks:
|> 
|> Detroit  10
|> Pittsburgh  9
How does Detroit lose at home (again), then beat Pittsburgh,
on the road, in the cold ? Foster may not have a big game 
(E. Smith 19 carries, 67 yards 11/8/92), but Cowher knows 
that. Can the passing game get on track ?

|> 
|> LA Rams  27
|> Dallas   23
Gee I hope not. I'm a Cowboys fan. (have been for a while) 


|> 
|> Philadelphia  3
|> Green Bay    38
huh-uh. RK be doin the qb shuffle. This week's gig in Milwaukee.
Opening act begins at 1pmEST. 

|> 
|> Phoenix  30
|> Atlanta  51
Really? The OU for this game is 42.

|> 
|> Washington  3
|> Kansas City 6
I'd love to see this, but can't bet against someone scoringa td.

|> 
|> Cincinnati  34
|> NY Jets     9
|> 
|> Houston    3
|> Minnesota 51
no way.
|> 
|> New England  24
|> Indianapolis 21
this is the week for NE to break through? AND with three touchdowns
to boot!!! (or is that 8FGs?)

|> 
|> San Diego  28
|> Cleveland  27
right on. 
|> 
|> Chicago    24
|> Tampa Bay  21
yep. This will be like watching the dogs of the NFCC fight for scraps.
Great game for folks who love to watch the trenches. 
|> 
|> New Orleans  13
|> San Francisco 31
Move a SF td to NO. Quinn Early can't hold Rice's shoe strings. But then
he doesn't have to play against Rice.

|> 
|> Seattle    3
|> LA Raiders 10
I'd like to swap scores for this one with the KC-Wash game. basically
this is a 3rd string (Seattle) vs a second stringer (either of them).
(Yes, I still count Krieg as their #1 guy. Yes I know he's in KC, but
he wasn't replaced with a first-string quality qb.)

|> 
|> NY Giants  27
|> Denver      3
No way. Elway, in mile-high, free from LT harassment (sadly). Take
a td from NY, and let John score three in the last 8 mins.

|> 
|> Buffalo    38
|> Miami      17
Why not. Most of the other MNF games have been blowouts.

|> 
|> Comments welcome.
|> 
|> Carl

ditto here.

-- 
Cary W Reams | sneakers.ksh <"cary w. reams"
NT/BNR/MTXVO | TOO MANY SECRETS:> wry as a merc.   
---------------------------------------------------------------
My opinions are not necessarily shared by Northern Telecom/BNR. 
---------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kenb@ssec.wisc.edu (Ken 'TEX' Bywaters)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Green Bay Radio Station
Date: 10 Nov 92 22:49:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: daffy.1992Nov10.224954.18243
Organization: Space Sci. and Eng. Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison

In article <GORNISH.92Nov10125251@sp1.csrd.uiuc.edu> gornish@sp1.csrd.uiuc.edu (Edward H. Gornish) writes:
>What radio stations carry Green Bay games?  I'll be driving from
>Champaign, IL to Minneapolis this Sunday, from ~8:00 AM - ~6:00 PM, so
>I figure I'll be in range of the broadcast during game time.  I'd be
>interested in any stations that broadcast the games - not just Green
>Bay or Milwaukee stations (is there a Madison station?).
>
You can try 1070AM or 1310AM out of Madison.  One of those will definitely
have it.  you get the added bonus of listening to Max McGee and his
'No Look' Broadcast.  I actually heard him say one time, "He's open! He's
open!  Wow, did you see that?"  That was about 1989 and I'm still trying
to find out what happened.

>Perhaps I should keep secret the fact that I'm an Eagles fan ...

Hmmmm.  Make sure you stop and pay the Eagle Excise Toll at the border.
>
>thanks
> 
>--
>Eddie Gornish
>University of Illinois - Center for Supercomputing Research & Development
>
>ARPANET: gornish@csrd.uiuc.edu

-Ken Bywaters

**Yet another Cowboy bandwagon jumper since 1965**
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan )
Subject: Cowboys Versus 9ers
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 23:20:32 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


With all this talk about Eagles and the 9ers, what about
predicting the outcome of a  most probable Cowboys/49ers
NFC Championship match.

IMO, this will be a fiercely competed game from both the
sides.  Somehow, I feel that the way to the Super-Bowl
for any team in the NFC is either going through Candle-Stick
or Dallas.

Again, I will give the edge to the 9ers against the Cowboys
and I feel that the SF will win its 5th SB.

Where does it leave the Vikes and the Saints. I honestly
feel that both these teams do not have the offence to
make it deep into the playoffs. This I am saying in spite
of being a die-hard Vikes' fan. But one has to be realistic
and not clouded by personal fan prejudices.

However, I would love to see the Vikes take on the Saints
and the Cowboys in the playoffs, as the Vikes are already
scheduled to play the Eagles and the 9ers in the regular
season.  

S.H
AND I WILL FOREVER BLEED PURPLE!!
From: dkl@cs.arizona.edu (David K. Lowenthal)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: SD Chargers Midseason Review
Date: 6 Nov 92 08:40:06 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <40605@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi) writes:
>
>*Seau is arguably the best LB in the business. This guy has 
> unbelievable instincts. I have seen screen passes thrown to RBs 
> with lots of room in front, and Seau materializes out of 
> nowhere to stuff the play. Every aspect of his game is complete; pass 
> rush, run defense, blitzes, covering TEs, spying QBs, zone defense.

Hmm.  maybe he is worth a bit more than Danny Noonan....

just kidding


--dave
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Playoff picture
Date: 10 Nov 92 16:35:31 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <1992Nov9.083637.2339@math.ucla.edu> rfedkiw@crenshaw.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:
>NFC
>In the lead: Dallas

YES! YES! YES!

>                      5) Philly
>                      6) Washington
>Yes, in that order......
>Let's hear it !

OK . . . Washington should be ahead of Philly, since they are currently
winning the head-to-head tie breaker.

Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: drhall1@pbhya.PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall)
Subject: Re: Cities chosen for Super Bowl sites?
Reply-To: drhall1@PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 21:54:55 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.171854.16032@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami) writes:
>drhall1@PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall) writes:
>>>XIX     SF vs Miami 38 - 16   Stanford     84,059   Montana, SF
>>                               ^^^^^^^^
>>The networks screwed this one up so bad it could be an answer to a triva
>>question. If you believe that the "site" is a city and not a school, then
>>they played in Palo Alto.
>
>The Stanford Farm is *not* part of the city of Palo Alto.  The stadium
>is on campus, so as a matter of fact, it *is* at Stanford, and not in
>Palo Alto.

The "Stanford Farm" is *not* a city. The networks said that the game took 
place in "Stanford, California". The same implication was made by the orginal
poster. Read my last sentence again. If this still confuses you, try asking
someone in the Political Science department to define a city for you under 
state law.
>
>
>>After all, Pitt didn't play Rams at USC.
>
>You must be confusing UCLA with USC again -- well, they both start
>with U.  I guess it's rally kinda hard to tell them apart.

I only have trouble telling Stanford apart from U.C. Berkeley. :)

>
>
>--Gidi
>
From: nlatif@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Nor Azlisya Abdul Latif)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Randall on the news
Date: 6 Nov 92 16:38:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: netnews.96486
Distribution: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <96352@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
>No no no no!  I am not talking about Randall's comments on ESPN.  According
>to the local news, he was going on about the end of the world and about
>floods and hurricanes.  Anyone else in Philly catch this?? Joe Dakes???
>(PS, yes Joe you are right, Randall did have a 400+ yard game against
>Chicago).
>
>satish nair
>go giants
>
>

Yup...I watched that too.  What was he thingking? End of the world?? Geeez...
Anyways, he did say that he has no problem with Kotite's descision. Thats 
good.  I just cant wait to see McMahon play this Sunday. 

GO EAGLES!!!
Azli
From: arth@sudshead.EBay.Sun.COM (Art Hebert)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: betting on football in vegas
Date: 11 Nov 1992 23:45:33 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems
Distribution: world
Reply-To: arth@sudshead.EBay.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: sudshead.ebay.sun.com

In article 92Nov11152156@terrorism.berkeley.edu, elm@cs.berkeley.edu (ethan miller) writes:
>In article <1drg7aINNqlj@male.EBay.Sun.COM> arth@sudshead.EBay.Sun.COM writes:
>=>The last two weeks any team that was an underdog by 10 or more
>=>covered.  I'm taking Rams, detroit and seattle in a 3 way parlay.
>
>You should pay more attention.  The last line I saw had Seattle +12
>against the Redskins.  They lost by 13, and didn't cover.
>
Yes they didn't cover but on my parlay card had them +13 and a tie is a
push so essentially I won a 2 way parlay, but it was on the edge.
>ethan
>--
>+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>ethan miller--cs grad student   | "Anybody not wearing 2000000 sunblock's
>elm@cs.berkeley.edu             |  gonna have a REALLY bad day.  GET IT?"
>#include <std/disclaimer.h>     |  -- Sarah Connor, _Terminator 2_




Organization: Senior, Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Thu,  5 Nov 1992 13:07:57 -0500 
From: Marcus Wilhelm Banzhaf <mb5g+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Steelers: Searcy
Distribution: world,local



Anyone out on the net have any idea with whats going on with Leon
Searcy.  I'm an avid Steeler fan and still have heard very little about
him.  Cope and Fleming never mention him on the telecasts and I haven't
heard much talk about him in the local talkshows either.  I read a small
article where the coaches said not to worry about Searcy and that he was
coming along fine.  Is it a case of another first round mistake for the
Steelers in this years draft.  I mean if this guy is below Ariel Solomon
on the depth chart, something must be wrong.  Granted the offensive line
is playing well, but Searcy was a guy projected to anchor the Steeler
offensive line for years to come.  I'm starting to think that he hasn't
been given a fair chance.  Obviously, he had plenty of practice blocking
legitimate defensive lineman back at Miami - both in practice and in
games.  I find it hard to believe the scouts could have been wrong about
him.  Well, if anyone has any information about Searcy, I wold really
appreciate it.

-marc
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: nix@aslslc43.asl.dl.nec.com (David Nix)
Subject: Best/Worst Trades
Summary: Walker trade
Organization: NEC America, Inc Irving TX
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:16:35 GMT

I have seen a lot of post opinions that the Herschel Walker trade ranks
right up there as the most lop-sided in NFL history, and I would have to
agree.  It was an all-or-nothing gamble that Walker would be the missing
link that would take Minnesota to the Superbowl, a gamble that failed and
cost Minnesota a couple of seasons.

The other side of the trade which makes it even more lop-sided is the fact
that Jimmy Johnson knew what to do with the draft choices once he got them.
Most of the Cowboy's top picks during Johnson's tenure have been good to
excellent, but no severe busts.  The Cowboys also picked up some draft
picks by trading Steve Walsh to the Saints, and turned the picks into more
good draft choices.

To top it off, Johnson picked up Charles Haley from San Francisco in the
off-season, and he has been the catalyst that has made the Cowboy defense
#1 in the NFL in total defense.  Although he has only two sacks he has
put so much pressure on opposing QBs that he has been double and triple-
teamed routinely, which has allowed Tolbert, Jeffcoat, Lett, and others
get to the QB.  Time after time this season he has single-handedly caved
in one side of the line allowing a sack by someone coimg in from the other
side.

Jimmy is a good coach, but he is an excellent evaluator of personnel.


Nix
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cowboys - Best in the League
Date: 5 Nov 92 19:06:03 GMT
Article-I.D.: devnull.2792
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <1992Nov5.081253.14903@athena.mit.edu> centry@athena.mit.edu (Jae H Nam) writes:
>In article <1992Nov2.191657.10825@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>,
>Miguel . Figueroa writes:
>> I'm wondering where all those beagle fans are? ... Probably left
>>  the country or maybe they killed themselves after the game, who
>>  knows!  Well, the show must go on and by the way, WOOF!
>3) No congratulations to Dallas.  I don't shake hands with the
>	enemy.

Fortunately, some people don't make the mistake that so many Cowboy haters
make -- confusing the fans with the team.  At least the real Eagles were
classy enough to congratulate the Cowboys on a game well played.  I won't 
let the caliber of some of their fans change the respect I have for them
as a team.

I think I'll go home and watch the highlights again.

Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro