From: eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections,talk.politics.misc,alt.sex
Subject: EDITORIAL: Sexual revolution -- Duke CHRONICLE
Keywords: family values, sex, sexual revolution, editorial
Date: 4 Sep 92 00:22:54 GMT
Followup-To: alt.rush-limbaugh
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

DISCLAIMER: It's not often that I type in editorials from the school
newspaper, but this one has caught my attention. I only offer this article
solely for the purposes of discussion.

Taken without permission from the Duke CHRONICLE < student-run newspaper >
from Wed Sep 02 92, p 11.

"Sexual revolution oversteps boundaries into immorality"
James Knudsen [second-year law student at Duke]

The chancellor of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst recently
approved the inclusion of pedophilia as a protected category within the
"Sexual Orientation" section of its affirmative action statement. In July,
Judge Jerry Lockett of Traveras County, Florida, threw out charges against
a man charged with statutory rape because, he said, the law violated the
teenager's privacy right to have sex with adults. These events, which went
mysteriously unnoticed in the press, bring shock to the faces of people who
hear them, but they foreshadow an extension of sexual plurality that is not
as improbable as some might think.

It may seem far-fetched to say that acceptance of pederasty and incest is
the logical end of the sexual revolution that began with the acceptance of
pre-marital sex, but take a look at the man who is widely praised and
revered as the "patron saint of sex" and the Father of the Sexual Revolution.
Drs. Judith Reisman and Edward Eichel have documented in Kinsey, Sex and Freud
that Dr. Alfred C. Kinsey was an incompetent researcher and a child molester.

Pages 176 and 180 of Kinsey's Sexual Behavior in the Human Male contain
the results of experiments with young males. The record of a four-year-old
indicates that he experienced 26 orgasms in 24 hours.

Defenders of Kinsey have said that the researchers used videotape, parents'
reports and the reports of pedophiles as their sources for child behavior.
The truth is these children were genitally tortured and traumatized, orally
and manually, by adult male pederasts. What was the "quality" of torture?

Kinsey answers, "Males in the present group suffer excruciating pain and
may even scream if movement is continued or the penis is even touched ...
will fight away from the partner and may make violent attempts to avoid
climax although they derive definite pleasure from the situation."

To summarize Kinsey's attitude toward sexual behavior, he equated humans
with other mammals and thus contended that any type of sexual behavior:
"Considering the physiology of sexual response and the mammalian backgrounds
of human behavior, it is not so difficult to explain why a human animal
does a particular thing sexually. It is more difficult to explain why each
and every individual is not involved in every type of sexual activity."

There's much more to be said of Kinsey's perversity, but other considerations
are more important. First, the best evidence against Kinsey is in his own
writings, so why have he and his findings not been thrown on the trash heap
of pathetic and immoral science? Second, notice the power of science. In
fact, the primary impetus behind the extension of sexual plurality is from
the scientific community.

The Kinsey Institute at the University of Indiana is the hub in the middle of
the wheel that includes Planned Parenthood, the Sex Information and Education
Council of the United States, Playboy (Hugh Hefner was a disciple of Kinsey),
Penthouse, Hustler and a number of homosexual organizations. Although I have
not said much about the pornographic and homosexual connection to the
pedophilia movement, it is real. The "gay manifesto" that has been decried
by homosexual leaders as being too moderate, after the Ball <<?>>, does not
condemn pederasty but only suggests that pederasts keep their activities
quiet.

Pedophile organizations such as the North American Man-Boy Love Association,
Childhood Sensuality Circle, and Rene Guyon Society have openly welcomed
and adopted the research of sexologists.

Although the evidence is subtle, two indications of the direction sexual
pluralism can be found in the August issue of Time. One story is about a
teacher at Exeter who has been accused of distributing child pornography and
having sexual relations with boys. The author of the article says that this
case will revive the debate over political correctness as it relates to
homophobia. I do not see an opportunity for debate over tolerance, but a
behavior that deserves no tolerance. Another article on bisexuality cites
Kinsey's faulty statistics and includes a series of photographs of pygmy
chimps engaging in different sexual activites. Under the four pictures is
the caption: "Every conceivable combination."

The primary aims of all groups, mainstream and radical, that accept the
concept of childhood sexuality have been to introduce explicit sexuality
education that advocates or tolerates many deviant sexual practices and to
encourage condom distribution without parental notification. Not only do these
groups stand on the immoral ground excavated by Kinsey, but their "scientific"
research and conclusions are highly suspect. Therefore, the sexual revolution
that was based on a lie should be comprehensively reevaluated before the
scientific community convinces us that the only problem with adult-child
sex is the guilt that society imposes on the participants.
*** END ***







-- 
Emil Thomas Chuck (Duke BME '93)		eyc@acpub.duke.edu
I'm too busy for my class, too busy for my clubs, too busy for my work.
I'm too busy for my mail, too busy for my news, too busy for my life.
I'm too busy for this .sig. 
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh