HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: soc.women
Subject: Derrogatory terms for men and women (was Re: <none>)
From: royce@mdcbbs.com (Royce D. Myers EDS/Unigraphics)
Date: 20 Nov 92 17:31:54 GMT
Organization: EDS Unigraphics, Cypress CA
Nntp-Posting-User: royce

In article <9873@armltd.uucp>, hwatters@armltd.uucp (Helen Watters) writes:
> [...comments on single sex washrooms, etc, deleted]
> I guess he was a bitch too :-) or can bitch only refer to women?  What 
> is the male equivalent?

An interesting point.  A derrogatory term for a woman is "bitch", derived from
the verb that means "complain rudely" (and appears unrelated to the "bitch"
that means female dog).  Straight men are not refered to as "bitches"; the
comparable term seems to be bastard (i.e., his mother was not married). So even
the crime of being a bastard can be traced to a woman.

-- 
Royce Myers			
royce@mdcbbs.com
Newsgroups: soc.women,soc.men
From: mec6@quads.uchicago.edu (rini)
Subject: Re: The Beauty Myth (was:Re: Elle MacPherson causes rape?)
Reply-To: mec6@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 16:48:38 GMT

rivero@mdcbbs.com (Michael Rivero) writes:
>krw@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (keith.r.smith) writes:

>|> I guess that 95% of men look like the "Marlboro Man" ......
 
>  God, I HOPE not! He just died two weeks ago of (you can see this coming,
>can't you) lung cancer!  :)

Lung cancer?  Is that the same Marlboro Man I'm thinking of? 
The one who was the longest surviving AIDS victim in the US?  
(I guess there have been a few different Marlboro Men, so maybe
we're talking about different guys....)

rini

Xref: sparky soc.women:19765 soc.men:19449
From: debra@creatures.cs.vt.edu (Debra Potts)
Newsgroups: soc.women,soc.men
Subject: Re: Naked Man on Campus
Keywords: public nudity
Date: 17 Nov 92 19:19:12 GMT
Followup-To: soc.women

Janice Kendall writes:
>
> I was wondering what reaction people have to the guy at UC-Berkeley
> (where else) who expresses himself by attending class naked. 

	Sure, I know myself well enough to know I would feel more than
	a little uncomfortable ("passive embarrassment"?) around a
	fellow classmate completely in the buff, but I suppose that
	nudity is his/her right.

	The only thing that gags me, and makes me think I would probably
	support some sort of rule that at least bottom undies must be
	worn, is the cleanliness aspect.  We all share those little
	desks, and I would no more like to put my little rump on a spot
	just caressed by someone's private-est part than I would want to
	plop down onto a park bench that had just had a pile of vomit or
	dog poopy wiped off with a paper towel.  I mean, YUK!

	Now, while said student MAY keep him/herself completely pristine
	at all times, there is no law that says one has to bathe.  At least
	if you are wearing underpants, something is protecting you from the
	germy desk seat and the germy desk seat from you.

	And any woman OR man who changes his or her undies on a daily basis
	cannot refute that a desire for clothing variety is NOT the reason
	we doff those skivvies every night/morn for a fresh pair...  

	Of course if you want to stand in the classroom, bring a towel or
	stadium seat, or plunk down on the icy tile floor, I have absolutely
	no objection to you coming to class wearing nothing but a smile.

(tho I can't help but laugh at the thought of Jay Leno's monologue last night:
  "Yeah, well, let's see how dedicated he [the "in"famous Berkeley student]
   would be if he went to school in Michigan."--or something like that!)

:)

debbie p.
From: Human Rights Coordinator <hrcoord@igc.apc.org>
Newsgroups: soc.rights.human
Date: 15 Nov 92 11:40 PST
Subject: EAST TIMOR: Human rights deteriora
Nf-ID: #N:cdp:1476700807:000:2886
Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!hrcoord    Nov 15 11:40:00 1992


From: Human Rights Coordinator <hrcoord>
Subject: EAST TIMOR: Human rights deteriora

/* Written 10:42 pm  Nov 14, 1992 by aiusala@igc.apc.org in igc:ai.general */
Amnesty International
International Secretariat                                                   
1 Easton Street
London WC1X 8DJ
United Kingdom

EMBARGOED FOR MONDAY 9 NOVEMBER

INDONESIA/EAST TIMOR: AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL FEARS FURTHER DETERIORATION OF
HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION

Amnesty International said today that the human rights situation in East Timor
has not improved in the year since the Santa Cruz massacre, and that it will
inevitably deteriorate further without fundamental changes in the Indonesian
Government's policies and practices. The organization said the government had
failed utterly to honour the letter and spirit of various United Nations
statements and recommendations with respect to East Timor. 

      Summarizing the worsening human rights situation over the past twelve
months, Amnesty International noted that:

    In the weeks prior to the anniversary of the massacre, the authorities
arrested hundreds of suspected supporters of East Timor's independence to
prevent them from publicly and peacefully expressing their political views.

    Torture and ill-treatment of political detainees continues to be both
common and routine, and, despite its earlier promise to do so, the government
has made little apparent effort to implement the recommendations of the UN
Special Rapporteur on Torture, whose report was published earlier this year.

    The government has sealed off the territory, preventing visits by
international delegations and journalists, and most recently denying access to
Amnesty International, although it had been urged by the UN Commission on
Human Rights (UN-CHR) in March to "facilitate access to East Timor for
additional humanitarian and human rights organizations." 

    Despite the UN-CHR's expressed hope that it would do so, the government
has failed to account for as many as 100 people who "disappeared," and has
still identified only 19 of the more than 100 who were killed during and after
the massacre. 

    The government has meted out sentences up to life imprisonment to more
than a dozen East Timorese for their peaceful political activities, in trials
which made a mockery of international standards of fairness. 

    In contrast to these heavy sentences, after the massacre the government
brought only a few low-ranking soldiers to trial, all but one for disciplinary
offences, and none received a sentence longer than 18 months.

      On the occasion of the first anniversary of the Santa Cruz massacre,
Amnesty International called on the Indonesian Government to demonstrate its
stated commitment to the future protection of human rights with concrete
measures. It said that idle promises could no longer satisfy the international
community.
From: Hilary Naylor <hnaylor@igc.apc.org>
Newsgroups: soc.rights.human
Date: 21 Nov 92 22:01 PST
Subject: East Timor: AI concern re Xanana Gu
Nf-ID: #N:cdp:1476700814:000:1545
Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!hnaylor    Nov 21 22:01:00 1992


From: Hilary Naylor <hnaylor>
Subject: East Timor: AI concern re Xanana Gusmao

/* Written  5:55 pm  Nov 20, 1992 by MAILER-DAEMON@web.apc.org in igc:pn.alerts */
/* ---------- "AI seeks protection for Xanana" ---------- */
Subject: AI seeks protection for Xanana

/* Written  7:12 pm  Nov 20, 1992 by gn:tapol in web:reg.easttimor */
/* ---------- "AI seeks protection for Xanana" ---------- */
Amnesty on Xanana's arrest

Amnesty International statement of 20 November 1992:


Xanana Gusmao, 46, the leader of East Timor's resistance
movement was arrested at 6am today in Dili. It is not yet
known where he is detained, but shortly after his arrest,
government sources said that he was "undergoing intensive
interrogation".

In view of the consistent pattern of torture and ill-treatment
of East Timorese political detainees while under
interrogation, Amnesty International is deeply concerned for
the safety of Xanana Gusmao. The organisation is particularly
concerned that because of Xanana's position as commander of
the armed resistance, Indonesian military authorities may
employ torture to extract political and military intelligence.

Amnesty is seeking immediate guarantees from the Indonesian
authorities that Xanana Gusmao will be treated humanely while
in detention, that representatives of the International
Committee of the Red Cross will be granted immediate and
unconditional access to his place of detention and that he
will be accompanied by a lawyer of his own choice while being
interrogated, as required by Indonesian law.
From: darrell@twics.co.jp
Newsgroups: soc.rights.human
Subject: Needed: LISTSERV with Amnesty UA list dist'n...
Date: 16 Nov 92 11:03:16 GMT
Organization: TWICS, Tokyo, Japan

I'm looking for a LISTSERV machine distributing the Amnesty Urget Action
notices. I used to get it from jhuvm.earn, but that server now denies
having the list. Can anyone help? I am NOT at a bitnet site. Thanks.
                                           - darrell.
(please email to darrell@twics.co.jp)
From: Human Rights Coordinator <hrcoord@igc.apc.org>
Newsgroups: soc.rights.human
Date: 17 Nov 92 15:32 PST
Subject: El Sal: CUANES Update
Nf-ID: #N:cdp:1476700810:000:2254
Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!hrcoord    Nov 17 15:32:00 1992


From: Human Rights Coordinator <hrcoord>
Subject: El Sal: CUANES Update

/* Written  8:57 am  Nov 17, 1992 by cuanes@igc.apc.org in igc:carnet.alerts */
              CUANES Update 11-16-92   (Alert 368)

Adolfo Aguilar Payes has been moved from Mariona Prison to Rosales
Hospital in San Salvador.  On Friday November 13  Payes was seen by a
private doctor and a representative of ONUSAL.  Due to his very serious
physical condition, the doctor recommended he be hospitalized
immediately.  Payes was taken to the hospital on Saturday and was put on
an I.V.  He continues his hunger strike begun over a month ago.

Adolfo Payes has been in detention for over three years without trial.
Reportedly, the judge in the case will set a trial date this week, with
the trial set for sometime next week.

It has been learned that Adolfo Payes has received threats while at
Mariona, and has received a threat against his life since he was moved
to the hospital.

(For details of case see CUANES Alert 11-9 and Update 11-12 or
 Kathy Howell  - CUANES; 708-475-7980; fax 708-475-1122
 PeaceNet e-mail  - cuanes@igc.org )

REQUESTED ACTION:
(1) Please continue to fax letters and send telexes to requesting (a)
    guarrantee of physical safety; (b) continued adequate medical care;
    (c) an immediate fair and impartial trial or immediate, and safe
    release from prison

 Lic Alfredo Cristiani           telephone:  011-503-71-1555
 Presidente de la Republica      fax:  011-503-79-3401
 Casa Presidencial               telex:  20245
 San Salvador  El Salvador

 Dr. Rene Hernandez Valiente
 Ministro de Justicia
 Ministerio de Justicia           fax:  011-503-23-2611
 San Salvador  El Salvador        telex: 20179   20599

 Dr. Carlos Mauricio Molina Fonseca
 Procuraduria para la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos
 Edificio AMSA, No. 535
 5a Calle Pte y 9a Av. Nte            fax:  011-503-71-2886
 San Salvador  El Salvador

(2)  Please request faxed letters to above regarding Adolfo Payes from
     elected officials and religious leaders to be sent as soon as
     possible.

TO SEND TELEXES OR FAXES:  Worldlink  1-800-827-2831; fax 800-827-2833
 Faxnet 1-800-831-2202;  800-241-1170 fax
 Both have CUANES Sample Message 368, or fax or dictate your own.
From: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale)
Subject: Re: Oprah 11/19
Organization: DSG, Dept. of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 20:51:42 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.040700.26375@col.hp.com>
smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith) writes:
>(This is from my wife, using my account...it's her first time using
>USENET, so cut her some slack...) [...]
>1) I believe that whether a person is gay or straight depends on genetics.
>Therefore, when a person is born, it has already been determined...being
>gay is not "learned behavior that one can change" as the religious fanatics
>would have us believe.  Is this belief correct?

A lot of people think that if it could be proven that people are "born
gay" then oppression of gayfolk would stop. I don't think so. After all,
black folk are born black yet that fact doesn't stop a racist bigot from
hating blacks. Similarly, about 50% of the population are born female
yet that does not many men from being sexist.

So my answer to your question is "It doesn't matter."


Ciaran.
-- 
---- Ciaran McHale (cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie)
\bi/ Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
 \/  Telephone: +353-1-7021539 FAX: +353-1-6772204
Xref: sparky soc.motss:48581 talk.politics.misc:61028 ca.politics:9735
From: walsh@optilink.COM (Mark Walsh)
Newsgroups: soc.motss,talk.politics.misc,ca.politics
Subject: Re: A Strand of Bigotry
Date: 19 Nov 92 20:23:51 GMT
Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA

From article <1992Nov19.052244.18536@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, by gsh7w@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy):
> In article <13256@optilink.UUCP> cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:
> #The homosexual fascist lobby won't -- that's why they insist on
> #laws regulating private actions between consenting adults.

> Why do you continue to delete my points and blandly repeat challenged
> statements. 

> There is disagreement that walking into a Hiton hotel and trying to
> rent a room is a "private" action between consenting adults. 

Then where do you draw the line?  If the home has, say,
more than four bedrooms?  Five?  Ten?  I stayed at a motel
once that had only six rooms.  What about them?  Come on,
give me a break!  The Hilton is as large as they are because
they have run their business well and have grown as a result.
Should the purpose of the government be to punish them for
that success?  Is success (or wealth) so wrong that it must
be regulated?

> And you have not responded to the point that there are no absolute
> rights, and there are conflicts between your right to choose who you
> rent to, and the minorities right to be able to rent a house.

There are no conflicts here.  But those who want to rent
should not have the government on their side forcing
someone to rent to them.  That is a conflict.
-- 
Mark Walsh (walsh@optilink) -- UUCP: uunet!optilink!walsh
AOL: BigCookie -- Amateur Radio: KM6XU@WX3K -- USCF: L10861
"What, me worry?" - William M. Gaines, 1922-1992
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance)
Subject: Re: Marky Mark and Calvin Klein (was Re: Scott Masden)
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 13:21:40 GMT

dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) writes:

>In article <thaaang.722047060@cwis> thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance) writes:
>>>Oh.  Is there a queue forming?  :-)
>>Yeah. I wanna sit on Greg's face too.

>What, and miss those sparkling eyes?

I got eyes in the back of my... nevermind.

--
John Dorrance        * Sexyfunky Motherfuckerdiva *   thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu

		I bet if you threw that ass into the air
			It'd turn into sunshine!
From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Ins and Outs
Date: 17 Nov 92 04:06:27 GMT
Article-I.D.: spdcc.1992Nov17.040627.13821
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA

In article <Bxtywr.BrL@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu> cssam@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Scott Minor) writes:
>>>*      George Stephanopoulos           Marlin Fitzwater
>>>* George Stephanopoulos is REALLY CUTE!
>>More like OH-MY-F*CK*NG-GOD CUTE!!!
>Golly, and I thought I was the only one who noticed (and lusted for) Mr.
>Stephanopoulos!
>He is the only person I have seen that will actually cause me to stop my
>channel flicking at C-SPAN.

I'd think he was cuter if he had followed his father's career.

-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
Xref: sparky soc.motss:47745 talk.politics.misc:60320 ca.politics:9588
From: laura@hoptoad.uucp (Laura Creighton)
Newsgroups: soc.motss,talk.politics.misc,ca.politics
Subject: Re: Inconsistency re CO boycott
Date: 15 Nov 92 14:56:10 GMT
Reply-To: laura@hoptoad.UUCP (Laura Creighton)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco

In article <13088@optilink.UUCP> cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:
>They may be in opposition to a PARTICULAR boycott because:
>
>1. It won't work.
>
>2. The goal is disreputable (e.g., boycotting a business because
>it hires black people).
>
>3. It hurts the victims more than the oppressors (e.g., South
>Africa).
>
>
>Boycott is definitely the morally correct way to express your
>upset.  The government is not.  Boycotts, however, require a
>very substantial committment to the goal to work.  Adam Clayton
>Powell, Jr., made very effective use of the boycott to end
>discrimination in hiring in New York City department stores in
>the 1930s.  It's a shame homosexuals can only think in terms
>of a great big government, coming in to FORCE people to change.
>-- 
>Clayton E. Cramer {uunet,pyramid}!optilink!cramer  My opinions, all mine!
>The Physician Assisted Death Initiative failed.  Term limits for Congressmen
>passed.  If only we could have combined the two... two terms, and a doctor
>does lethal injection...

Why can't you see the homosexuals who do not think in terms of a
great big government coming in to FORCE people to change?  There
are pleanty of us here.

Count me in on #1 and #3 of your reasons to object to a boycott,
plus a great distaste that some who don't live in Colorado can
wax self-righteous about `doing something' by boycotting
Colorado while our sisters and brothers there can rot, (with
deepest sympathies, no doubt.)

Better than skiing another place, take the $$ you would have
spent in Colorado and send it to a group that is either putting
a new initiative on the ballot, or getting OC-2 declared
unconstitutional.  Now that might be a sacrifice -- no skiing!

Feh!

Boycotts work when they are specifically targetted at exactly
those who need to change.  ``All of Colorado'' is way too
amorphous for it to work.

Not going to Boulder will destroy those Gay and Lesbian
Bed&Breakfasts there, though.

Feh.



-- 
    Since Ryan White was buried in April 1990, his grave has been vandalized
    *more than* four times.

    (this news courtesy Phil Paxton ipwp400@indycms.bitnet)

Laura Creighton 
toad@toad.com
hoptoad!laura
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer)
Subject: more faces for the soc.motss photo archive
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 09:01:53 GMT

All of these can be snarfed from ursa-major.spdcc.com via anonymous FTP
in the directory /pub/motss.pix.

h/halloween.in.sf.JPEG		- a nearby dinner table at Letitia's on H'ween
a/amanda_walker.JPEG		- Amanda at Interop in SF
m/max_meredith_vasilatos2.JPEG	- Max at Arne's Boston party
g/glen_and_stephena.JPEG	- Stephen Arrants and his husbear Glen
j/jim_hibbs.JPEG		- Jim Hibbs of JHU
b/brown_behr3.JPEG		- Chris Smith
c/charlie_fulton.JPEG		- charlie@isis.mit.edu taken at Arne's party
b/ba.motss.dinner.w.amelia.JPEG - April 30, 1990 visit of Amelia to SF
j/jess_anderson2.JPEG		- Recent photo after being laid up.
				  The man must have a portrait in his closet.
j/jim_berninger.JPEG		- berninge@cs.purdue.edu

-- 
Steve Dyer
dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
Newsgroups: soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality,co.politics
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: dgilly@us.oracle.com (Daniel Gilly)
Subject: Re: Lesbianville on 20/20
Organization: Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores CA 94065
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:17:36 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
              at Oracle Corporation.  The opinions expressed are those
              of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.

In article <25847@sybase.sybase.com> black@lester.sybase.com 
   (Chris Black) writes:

        >|> Inaccurate and exclusionary.  Lesbian != muffdiver.  
        >|>    (That's C for not equal.)

>Both exclusuionary, *and* too inclusive.  I have, to my delight, meant
>plenty of muff-diving men.  There are lots of female cocksuckers out
>there, too.
>
>Any theories as to why "muffdiver" and "cocksucker" are assumed to mean
>motss muffdiver or motss cocksucker?

I won't claim to be a cunning linguist, but I can offer my theory.

"Cocksucker" and "muffdiver" describe what one is, not what one does.  
They reduce someone to that one aspect, so they are usually interpreted
to be pejorative.  So the real question is, why should oral sex with 
motss be something people denigrate?
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Gilly                                 Oracle Corporation
dgilly@us.oracle.com                         Redwood Shores, CA
Xref: sparky soc.motss:48699 alt.politics.homosexuality:7477 co.general:1926 co.politics:2277
From: glp@fig.citib.com (Greg Parkinson)
Subject: Re: Bear Crap
Originator: glp@merlin
Organization: Citibank IBISM
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 15:07:45 GMT


In article <By1011.46E@queernet.org>, max@queernet.org (Max J. Rochlin) writes:
|> In article <1992Nov20.024725.16938@spdcc.com> rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue) writes:
|> >glp@fig.citib.com (Greg Parkinson) writes:
|> >>Space Aliens?  
|> >
|> >	No they're pretty hairless...
|> 
|> Oh yea,  Tell that to a Wookie or Klingon!

No no NO!  Wookies and Klingons are aliens.

Those featureless things that give polititians
rides in space are Space Aliens.  Space Aliens
have no fur because the people who read the
Weekly World News for content think that less
hair = more advanced, more removed from a bestial
heritage.

I, however, would miss the evidence of my bestial
heritage should it ever disappear.

-- 
Greg Parkinson                  Phone: 212-657-7814  Fax: 212-825-8607
Citibank,111 Wall Street        E-Mail: glp@fig.citib.com
New York, New York  10043
The opinions expressed are my own and not those of the big 'ol bank.
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: gsmith@clio.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith)
Subject: Re: What Gay Sex (was Re: How Many Homosexuals?)
Organization: IWR, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 11:24:32 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.000530.29451@reed.edu> nelson@reed.edu (Nelson
Minar) writes:

>ObMotss - after learning the word "chthonian" (from what source, I am
>ashamed to admit), I did my damndest to use it in an English paper.

H. P. Lovecraft?
-- 
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/IWR/Ruprecht-Karls University 
               gsmith@kalliope.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
From: wood@siemens.com. (Jim Wood)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Bob Dole Quote
Date: 17 Nov 92 18:49:27 GMT

anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:

>tab@blitzen.cc.bellcore.com (biederman,thomas) writes:

>>Bob Dole, Republican of Kansas, the Senate minority leader, on
>>Mr. Clinton's plan to lift the ban on homosexuals in the armed forces:

>>Sounds like something from the 1940's to me         

>Dole always sounds more like 1840s to me.  When does he next
>stand for election?

The asshole was just re-elected to another 6-year term.  He next
stands for re-election in 1998 (gasp!) when he'll be 75 years old.

--
Jim Wood [jwood@siemens.siemens.com] (609) 734-3643
"Rise up on the wings of eagles, and two step among the stars.
 You are not forgotten.  Your smile will echo forever."
   -- Ryerson Schwark, to our friend Rob Bernardo.
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: buckmr@vccnw01.its.rpi.edu (Ron Buckmire)
Subject: Re: COLORADO: Addresses
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 20:41:37 GMT

dise@decoy.uoregon.edu (David Casti) writes:


>Can someone email me the latest list of who to write in Colorado?  I would  
>like to post it on the friendly BBSes here in Oregon.

I have some initial lists that are in /pub/QRD/qrd/rights/colorado/addresses*
on nifty.andrew.cmu.edu right now. If there is a master list or something I
would like to get hold of thta to make available.

-- 
RON BUCKMIRE
Fundraising Committee for the Procurement of a mesh tank-top for LL Cool J
11 Colvin Circle, Troy, NY 12180-3735
uunet!rpi.edu!buckmr||buckmr@rpitsmts.bitnet||buckmr@rpi.edu||+1 518 276 8910