HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tony2@mcl.ucsb.edu (Tony Chan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Preseason Women's Div. I Rankings
Date: 14 Aug 92 06:47:58 GMT


Here's the Preseason Division I Coaches Poll (as of Thurs. 8/13):
Rank	School		Last Years Record	Points Recvd.
1	UCLA		31-5			1190
2	Long Beach St.	36-2			1100
3	Hawaii		26-5			1052
4	Stanford	30-2			1031
5			UOP		24-6			1011
6	Nebraska	27-5			904
7	BYU		26-5			747

8	LSU		35-2			737
9	Texas		20-10			730
10	USC		23-8			705

Others Include:

13	UCSB		22-10			652
17	Pepperdine	23-8			396
21	Fresno St.	21-13			228
24	Arizona St.	14-12			130

(Source: Los Angeles Times)


Anyone have any opinions/agreements/disagreements ????

Personally, I think that we (UCSB) are being slighted a bit.....
We beat Texas in 4 games last year, split with Pacific, took UCLA to 5 games,
came within one serve of beating Long Beach St. in the regionals last year...
Anyway, you get the picture.... a definate lack of respect... but it just makes
us look better when we finish higher, I guess.  We're returning 5 of 6 starters
and have 3 Fab 50's incoming....

OK, so maybe I'm a little biased......(sorry about that)
I do agree with a lot of the rankings but the BIG WEST is arguably THE toughest
conference in the nation (Long Beach St., Hawaii, UOP, UCSB, Fresno St....)
3 of the top 5 teams in the nation in one league.... and we all have to play
each other TWICE a year..... no wonder its tough to have a GREAT record.

 Your thoughts please.......
 Tony
*******************************************************************************
Tony Chan
Assistant Coach			(yes, Kathy 'Motormouth' Gregory is my boss)
UC Santa Barbara
Women's Volleyball
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
From: davis@b11.b11.ingr.com (Chris Davis)
Subject: Volleyball Net System Plans
Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 14:21:51 GMT

In response to all the talk about portable net systems...

I have plans available for building your own system.  The plans include a
bill of materials and simple to follow instructions.  I am selling copies
of the plan for $10.  This system is ideal for grass or sand and provides 
a great amount of net tension.  The materials will run between $65 and $150
depending on the type of net you choose.  You won't need any special tools
either.  If you don't like the system after you build it, let me know and
I will refund the $10 for the plans.

If you are interested, call me and leave a message and I will call you back.

Chris Davis
205-880-3614
From: julian@frey.lbl.gov (julian cortella)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Re: Is V-Ball this expensive everywhere?
Date: 12 Aug 92 15:23:48 GMT
Reply-To: julian@frey.lbl.gov (julian cortella)
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.128.81

In article <ASH.92Aug12105054@ulysses.mr.ams.com> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:
>To play indoor volleyball in the Ann Arbor rec league, I have to fork
>out $40 for a 10 week season.  This is the A level, with 2 refs, one
>one-hour match per week, plus one one-hour practise each week.  Lowere
>levels cost just slightly less, while the "open" level costs slightly
>more.  Is this out of line with what people are paying elsewhere?
>Volleyball has gotten VERY popular here.  Maybe it's the law of supply
>and demand...

If you mean $40 for just yourself, yes that's a bit steep, but not
outrageous.  Around here, we pay $185 a team (six person) for a ten
week season.  There aren't any practice sessions either.

We have an outdoors four-person league going on now.  It's $80
for a ten week season, but we usually play two matches a night.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball,alt.binaries.pictures.misc
From: rjl@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (Reggie Lewis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Re: Is V-Ball this expensive everywhere?
Date: 13 Aug 92 15:22:23 GMT
Organization: UNIX(R) System Laboratories

In article <ASH.92Aug12105054@ulysses.mr.ams.com> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) writes:
>To play indoor volleyball in the Ann Arbor rec league, I have to fork
>out $40 for a 10 week season.  This is the A level, with 2 refs, one
>one-hour match per week, plus one one-hour practise each week.  Lowere
>levels cost just slightly less, while the "open" level costs slightly
>more.  Is this out of line with what people are paying elsewhere?

Well, I think you have it good.  I belong to two A-Level leagues 
in NYC.  Last year one league cost me $75 and another $70 for a 10
game season.  This does not incluse any practice sessions or anything
else.

Also approximately 30 of volley-friends rent a gym on Sundays in the
fall/winter and we each paid $180 for 3 months of Sunday play.

I wish volleyball were alot cheaper....


----------
Reggie Lewis

EMAIL:	...!att!attmail!reglewis
	rjl@usl.com

VOICE:	Evenings: 212-924-6560 
	Days:     908-522-6067
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
From: graeme@research.canon.oz.au (Graeme Wong See)
Subject: Who played from '88?
Organization: Canon Information Systems Research Australia
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 23:46:26 GMT


I'm curious to know what happened to those from the 88 team who tried out
for the US team. I know Timmons got in, the other guy Cv??????? played.
What happened to Craig Buck and Doug Partie and whoever else tried out. What
was the reason for them being cut?

Graeme
From: DRH4@psuvm.psu.edu (Daryl R. Hoffman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Re: Is V-Ball this expensive everywhere?
Date: 12 Aug 92 20:51:24 GMT
 <1992Aug12.180728.23967@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Penn State University


  Volleyball here in Bellefonte, PA (near State College, PSU) is currently
at $100 a team for about an 8-10 week session.  This does not include any
referees.  Each team has to call their own 'faults'.  We usually have about
8-10 players on a team so that is very reasonable.

  We also play 2 to 4 matches a night, after a week or two of practice games.

Daryl R. Hoffman              The Pennsylvania State University
Bitnet:   DRH4@PSUVM.BITNET   Center for Academic Computing
Internet: DRH4@PSUVM.PSU.EDU  Programmer Analyst, Resource Administration
Office: (814) 865-0845        Fax: (814) 863-7049
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball,alt.binaries.pictures.misc
From: wang@ibma1.cs.uiuc.edu (Eric Wang)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Re: sidesets
Date: 20 Aug 92 03:26:08 GMT
Reply-To: wang@ibma0.cs.uiuc.edu
Distribution: rec
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Sidesetting over the net in outdoor vb is illegal because outdoor vb
usually means 2-person beach, and it's just unreasonable to require two
people to defend against spikes *and* sideset dink shots.  It's
perfectly legal in indoor vb, which is usually 6-person, because 6
people *can* be reasonably expected to cover junk like sidesets.  (In
fact, it's not even very hard for 6 people to do so, which is why you
almost never see any intentional sidesets over the net.)  I wonder if
sidesets over the net are legal in 4-person outdoor vb, e.g. grass.

Eric Wang
wang@ibma0.cs.uiuc.edu
From: sammy@anagld.analytics.com (Sam Blackburn)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Re: Coaches' Top 20 Preseason Poll
Date: 14 Aug 92 13:46:23 GMT
Organization: Computer Sciences Corporation - Systems Engineering Division

julian@frey.lbl.gov (julian cortella) writes:


> found this in the paper today:

>DIVISION I PRESEASON TOP 20
>----------------------------------------

Men's or Women's?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
From: umlehner@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Mike Lehnertz)
Subject: Re: Preseason Women's Div. I Rankings
Organization: Educational Computing Network
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 23:22:35 GMT

   My thoughts? yes, I am glad that you put Kathy Gregory's new
nickname into your sig file. Yes, I am sure we will see the new column
of "Ask Motormouth" in the next Volleyball Monthly. Too funny. And,
where was URI in that list?


                                        - Drummer -
From: rsk@aspen.circ.upenn.edu (Rich Kulawiec)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Re: In favor or rally scoring...
Date: 14 Aug 92 15:25:57 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Cardiothoracic Imaging Research Center

Rally scoring seems like a contrivance to speed up the game to make it
more palatable for television.  Like the shot clock in college and pro
basketball, and the timing changes over the last few years in the NFL,
all of this seems to be an attempt to capture the ever-decreasing
attention span of the television viewer.

The point of all this escapes me, but then again I have a pretty long
attention span.  I figure that if the first four games of a volleyball
match take two hours, what's the problem with spending another half hour
watching the finale?  It seems to me that any match that makes it to the
fifth game probably involves two reasonably-well-matched teams, which
often makes for exciting play.  Why take such an even matchup and
attempt to balance it on the knife-edge of rally scoring?  If anything,
I'd want such a close match go *longer*, so that I could enjoy it.

---Rsk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
From: serge@ll.mit.edu (Sergio Cafarelli)
Subject: Re: Outdoor net set
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 92 16:19:24 GMT

In article <1992Aug11.191125.23085@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov> jsy@Aig.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Jennifer Yu) writes:
>I'm would like to invest in a good outdoor net set (so I don't have to
>keep borrowing my friends').  I was told of one in Spike Nashbar for about
>$270.00.  Durable, light, compact, short setup time...  If you know of
>any good nets for prices up to $300.00 please let me know. 
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jennifer
>

I will tell you from my experience....I use The Net Centerline and i really, really like it.
I've also used HOME COURT and was very pleased with it.

Personally i would stay away from Park and Sun, The Cobra System and The Ultimate System....
They never seem to have the right height

Serge
From: kaena@haleiwa.austin.ibm.com (D. Kaena Freitas)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Re: more height!!!!
Date: 19 Aug 92 13:11:12 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <1992Aug17.195313.21500@ll.mit.edu> serge@ll.mit.edu (Sergio Cafarelli) writes:
>I am very curious to find out Who upset Kiraly and Steffes? Also, did they win their 13th
>tournament in a row?
>
>A curious Fan
>Serge Mon


I believe it was Whitmarsh/Lewis who defeated them. No, they did not win 13
in a row, they were stopped at 12.

-- 
D. Kaena Freitas
/* My personal opinions mean nothing to anyone else but myself. */
/* At least thats what my wife keeps telling me................ */
/* I believe she is right...................................... */
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball,alt.binaries.pictures.misc
From: erude@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Erick Rudiak)
Subject: RE: Volleyball gifs...
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 14:09:28 GMT

	Something got messed up in breaking up the uuencoded file...
	
	I'll work on it.  Stay tuned...

-- Erick
_____________________________________________________________________
                                                | 
I tell myself, hey, only fools rush in          | Erick Rudiak
Only time will tell if we stand the test of time| erude@nwu.edu
And all I know, you've got to run to win        |____________________
And I'll be damned if I get hung up on the line | "I'm not worthy..."
                                                |      \o/      \o/
    -- Van Halen, "Why Can't This Be Love"      | O__   \\  O__  \\
________________________________________________|_/__|__||__/__|_||__
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
From: umsk@unixg.ubc.ca (HanJoo Eom)
Subject: Re: A Question
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 22:32:28 GMT
From: julian@frey.lbl.gov (julian cortella)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Coaches' Top 20 Preseason Poll
Date: 13 Aug 1992 20:00:21 GMT
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA USA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.128.81

 found this in the paper today:

DIVISION I PRESEASON TOP 20
----------------------------------------
                       '91 Record  Pts
1. UCLA                    31-5    1190
2. Long Beach St (3)       36-2    1100
3. Hawaii                  26-5    1052
4. Stanford (5)            30-2    1031
5. Pacific                 24-6    1011
6. Nebraska                27-5     904
7. Brigham Young           26-5     747
8. LSU                     35-2     737
9. Texas                   20-10    730
10. Southern Cal           23-8     705
11. New Mexico             23-6     668
12. Florida                35-5     659
13. UC Santa Barbara       22-10    652
14. Ohio State             30-4     627
15. Penn State             26-6     519
16. Illinois               19-10    409
17. Pepperdine             23-8     396
18. Texas Tech             26-6     354
19. Colorado               25-10    314
20. Georgia                28-8     304

First place votes are shown in parentheses.
---------------------------------------------------

Geez, did only eight coaches vote in this thing?  More likely it's an
error on the local rag's part (San Francisco Chronicle).

Don't appear to be many surprises in this one.  My own thoughts:

-Take these numbers with a very large grain of salt.  The VB polls
 always seem to fluctuate dramatically.

-My personal underrated team pick: USC (Totally impartial.  I hate the
 trojans).  Last year they were a very young team which put it 
 together at the end.  I don't think there was a single senior on the
 team and they made it to the final four if I remember correctly.  I 
 recall seeing them beat Ohio St for third, but my mind is going . . .

-I have to agree with the no. 1 pick.  UCLA is gonna be tough.

-I know I'm a snob, but I still think the tams like Florida, LSU, and
 Ohio St. are overrated, even with their impressive records.  They are
 good teams, but I still think Nebraska is the only now west of the 
 rockies team to be able to compete with the top 5 or 10 teams in the 
 country.

-julian
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
From: schmke@cco.caltech.edu (Kevin Todd Schmidt)
Subject: Re: Who played from '88?
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 15:45:45 GMT

graeme@research.canon.oz.au (Graeme Wong See) writes:

>I'm curious to know what happened to those from the 88 team who tried out
>for the US team. I know Timmons got in, the other guy Cv??????? played.
>What happened to Craig Buck and Doug Partie and whoever else tried out. What
>was the reason for them being cut?

>Graeme

The players who returned to the team that were on the 88 team were:
Steve Timmons
Craig Buck
Doug Partie
Bob Ctvrtlik
Scott Fortune
Eric Sato
Jeff Stork

Craig Buck was the only one not at Barcelona and I believe that was because
of a knee problem and he left the team.  All of the others were starters
most of the time except for Sato who came in as a backrow specialist.

Kevin
-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
        __ ____   __ |                           |
       / // __ \ / / | Kevin T. Schmidt          | schmke@cco.caltech.edu
      / // /_/ // /  | Jet Propulsion Laboratory | schmidt@spc5.jpl.nasa.gov
From: davec@iplmail.orl.mmc.com (Dave Crowder)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: New Rule Changes.
Date: 14 Aug 92 19:24:09 GMT
Organization: Martin Marietta


	Could someone post all the rules changes that are currently
being considered?

			Thanks in advance,
					Dave C.
From: mwsn_ss@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Matthew Weasner)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Re: An Indoor/Outdoor Court System
Keywords: feasability, reality, existance
Date: 19 Aug 92 14:56:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: galileo.1992Aug19.145632.1916
Organization: University of Rochester (Rochester, NY)

In article <1992Aug18.162854.13500@infonode.ingr.com> scott@bell.b17a.ingr.com (Scott Bell) writes:
>
>  Does anybody know of a sand court that is setup indoors? I think it
> would be a great idea to have both and indoor/outdoor court setup 
> available. This way you could choose your play environment( minus the sun
> and wind and outdoors, of course ).

Indoor beach volleyball exists up here in Rochester at a place called Hot
Shots. They have three courts set up in a converted warehouse. They trucked
in much sand, at least 12 inches deep. Thats a lot of sand! It's a pretty 
good idea. They put a bar in, sound system,  they have leagues almost every
night of the week. Kinda expensive ($25 per hour), but it's great in the 
winter, when you get tired of pounding your knees on the gym floor, you can
jet over to Hot Shots and play indoor beach volleyball. They had Sinjin Smith
come in over the past winter and run some clinics and stuff. I know I was in
awe. 
No substitute for outdoor ball though! In the summer, that is. :-)

outta here...
matt.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
From: scott@bell.b17a.ingr.com (Scott Bell)
Subject: Re: Proposed rule changes
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 16:31:10 GMT

In article <1992Aug14.143955.1743@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, corwin@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (carl.w.smedberg) writes:
|> >    
|> > Why doesn't the referee/umpire committee or group install replay cameras
|> >like they have for other sports( namely football )? 
|> 
|> Sorry dude but you've spent too much time in the gym playing volleyball
|> lately. The replay cameras were slowing the game of football down 
|> so much that as of this season there gone! 
|> 
      "...too much time in the gym playing volleyball..."??
      
                  TOO MUCH IS NEVER ENOUGH!!!
      or maybe...
                  IF IT'S TOO MUCH THAN YOU'RE TOO OLD! ? ;)

      If you think it's too long in the gym, I'll go to the sand instead.

      It could be too much time watching the taped '92 Olympic VB matches,
      but NEVER playing!
     
      BTW, how old are you? ;)

|> I don't really have a problem with the "above the knee rule" but 
|> the "net contact", "centerline" and "1st ball freedom" changes will not
|> improve the level of the game! 
|>
      I think so too.
 
|> I hope to raise these issues with our regional referee chairperson. 
|> I'll post a follow up after that.
|>
   
      I'm sure you'll have PLENTY of time in-between matches to do this, Carl!
       ;) ;)
 
|> Carl Smedberg @ AT&T in beautiful Lisle Illinois
|> att!ihlpm!corwin

Help! I've fallen and can't reach my remote,
Scott
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
| Scott Bell                               |                           | 
| Intergraph Corp. - Mapping Sciences Div. | "Dreamin' takes you       |
| M/S IW17A2  Huntsville, AL  35894-0001   |  nowhere -                | 
| scott@bell.b17a.ingr.com   (Internet)    |  It's time to play."      | 
| uunet!ingr!b17a!bell!scott (uucp)        |                           | 
| W: 205-730-1776                          |    - Kenny Loggins        | 
|        #include <std_disclaim.h>         |                           |
|                                          |.vbguitarsbikesweightsrock.|
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
From: tomoo@hpmctt.mcm.hp.com (Tomoo Taguchi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
Subject: Re: more height
Date: 12 Aug 92 20:42:45 GMT
Organization: HP Cardiology Business Unit - McMinnville, OR

R3TLM@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU writes:
>     This one's fairly simple. What can I do to get more height?
>Any exercises you would recommend? I'm 5'8" and have a 25" vertical,
>but that doesn't do me any good against someone 6'4" with 18" upwards.
>
>                                        Spite

If you wear 8.5 or 9 shoes, I have some once-used Strength (Jump
Training) Shoes I'd like to sell.

Tomoo
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball,rec.sport.olympics
From: pwong@ctp.com (Peter Wong)
Subject: Re: Question on the women volleyball quarterfinals
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 12:17:36 GMT
Organization: Cambridge Technology Partners

In article <1992Aug6.130340.13304@athena.mit.edu>, tafrakes@athena.mit.edu (T. Andy Frakes) writes:
|> In article <l811bpINN8fq@pollux.usc.edu>, cluck@pollux.usc.edu (Carlos L. Luck) writes:
|> |> 
|> |> Could anybody answer why the women volleyball quarterfinals were different
|> |> then all the other sports, including men volleyball and men, women
|> |> basketball?
|> |> 
|> |> The pattern was that the first of each pool should meet the forth of the
|> |> other pool in the quarterfinals, but in the women volleyball case the
|> |> first advanced to the semifinals and the forth was automatically out. 
|> |> Why that?
|> 
|> I believe it's because the pools are smaller (why that is, I can
|> only guess).  With only 4 teams in each pool....
|> A: (USA, CIS, Japan, Spain)
|> B: (Cuba, China, Brazil, Holland)
|> ....I think only the top two in each pool advance to the semi-
|> finals (A1 vs B2 and A2 vs B1).
|> 
|> -Andy
|> 
I think the two three teams make it to the playoffs.

A1 and B1 get bys, A2 vs B3 and A3 vs B2. The winners of those matches play A1 and
B1.

...Peter
-- 
-=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=- -=+=-
|Peter Wong                        |                                  |
|pwong@ctp.com    (617)349-1180    |     This space intentionally     |
|Cambridge Technology Partners     |            left blank.           |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.volleyball
From: scott@bell.b17a.ingr.com (Scott Bell)
Subject: Re: Let's fight the change (rules)
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 13:22:08 GMT

In article <1992Aug16.051451.1946@wuecl.wustl.edu>, gene@wucs1.wustl.edu (_Floor_) writes:
|> 
        << Rule change flames nuked for space...>>

      As per the '92 USVBA Rule Book:

       Assistant Vice President and Chairman - Richard E. Smith
                                               10139 Grist Mill Court
                                               Manassas, VA 22110-6127
                                               (703)361-3815 (home phone)

       USVBA Rules Interperter - Dr. Neill H. Luebke
                                 18010 Continental Dr.,
                                 Brookefield, WI 53005
                                 (414)781-6502 (home phone)

       USA Representative from the FIVB Rules of the Game Commission:
                                 Dr. James Coleman
                                 P.O. Box 20336
                                 San Diego, CA 92100
                                 (619)692-4162( business phone )

    There ya go - give 'em your best 2 cents worth!
    Good Luck!

|> 
|>   _____    "But you can't really call that a dance. It's a walk." - Tony Banks
|>  /  ___\  ___  __ ___   ___      _____________   gene@cs.wustl.edu
|>  | / __  / _ \ | /   \ / _ \     |  physics  |   gene@lechter.wustl.edu
|>  | \_\ \ | __/ |  /\ | | __/     |racquetball|   gev1@cec2.wustl.edu
|>  \_____/ \___/ |_| |_| \___/     |volleyball |   gene@camps.phy.vanderbilt.edu
|>  Gene Van Buren, Kzoo Crew, Washington Univ. in St. Louis - #1 in Volleyball

Good Luck!
Get Vertical!
Scott
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
| Scott Bell                               |                           | 
| Intergraph Corp. - Mapping Sciences Div. | "Dreamin' takes you       |
| M/S IW17A2  Huntsville, AL  35894-0001   |  nowhere -                | 
| scott@bell.b17a.ingr.com   (Internet)    |  It's time to play."      | 
| uunet!ingr!b17a!bell!scott (uucp)        |                           | 
| W: 205-730-1776                          |    - Kenny Loggins        | 
|        #include <std_disclaim.h>         |                           |
|                                          |.vbguitarsbikesweightsrock.|
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_