From: lor@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (edward.lor)
Subject: Re: The Dynasty Continues..........
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 00:08:38 GMT

In article <1992Dec20.055613.63151@uvmark.uucp> davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>And... what about when we were argueing about Isiah/Stockton???  
What about it? who were on your side?

>Guess those that agreed with me were just Celtics fans... 
>Or what about the Robinson/Rodman debate??? 
Again, what about it? Guess a weenie can't argue about this one and ask
for help on the net, yet don't get much support either. 

>More Celtics fans???  
Yes, tell me who they are.

>Let's see...  Just how many of those were said by the same person, Ed???
Let's see, how many people were againt you on football.college?
The last I count (Nov. 25), these comments were from 5 people.

>And, statements sound great when taken out of context Ed...  I could 
>counter with a long list of even worse comments about you.. but why bother..
You could. Unlike you, I don't fake being "praised" and "appreciated" by
other people.

>I don't remember anyone, especially myself, make any claims to being 
>universally liked.  
well, look at your claims:

  "Funny, it seems I have had a large number of people PRAISING my
   posts on the net as informative and well-thought out ... However, in 
   many situations people have APPRECIATED the post I have put up"

In that case, the universe must only be your immediate family. Wait, does
that even include your wife?

>Having "allies", as you like to put it (I guess they all
>must be Celtics fans, right Ed) does not imply that one does not have 
>enemies/non-allies as well. 
Well, based on people's comments on rec.sport.football.college, I haven't
even seen any of your "allies" yet. It's a good thing that you haven't
achieved the "fame" yet in football.pro, so you can ACT innocent.

>???  Despised person??  Well, with comments such as 
>>It seems pretty obvious to me that Ed wants to continue this
>>bullshit...
There is one big difference between you and me. I don't FAKE getting
support when I am in flame war mode, while you keep bantering "people 
like my posts ...."

>I would question just which despised person you are referring too.  
>I HIGHLY doubt that I am anywhere near as "despised" as your are, especially
>the amazing amount of groups you are despised in.  
Well, at least not in rec.sport.football.college.

>Let's see..  You claim that "in all flame wars", I wimped out by saying
>"I am too smart to argue".  Hmmm..  pretty strong claim Ed.. got any proof
>or are you jsut blowing out your ass again...  Remember, using the "EdLorian
>Manual On Flame War Techniques", you have now made a claim that I have made
>a statement in "all flame wars"..  Prove it or admit your fuck up...
Isiah/Stockton:
  =Thanx to Ed for the final piece of trash to rebuke .... Well thanx
  =Ed, I was getting tired of this argument and you gave me the means
  =to end it .. "
Of course, you didn't stop right there.

Isiah/Malone:
  =As much as I hate doing this, because I know I will now get a hundred follow-up
  =posts from Ed either calling me a quitter or prodding me into posting again
  =so he can claim I'm a liar, I think the net agrees that this particular 
  =thread has gone far enough.   .....  So, sorry Ed, flame all you want,
  =but I see no need to continue this, except through E-mail..."
Again, you didn't end right there.
  
Rodman/Robinson/defense:
  =No.. It just means they are tired of it.  When an argument goes on for a month,
  =and there is absolutely no new information of use being presented on either
  =side, the argument stops having any meaning and becomes a useless waste of 
  =time.... At least one side has the intelligence to finally stop and ignore you.
And your intelligence seems to emerge when you are out of gas in an argument,
after about a month ....

Boston Bias:
  =Alright Ed, I think we have now reached our 1 month limit...  It is time this
  =thread stopped, once again.  I am bored with having to re-read old posts
  =and stuff.  Oh, don't worry, I am sure you will respond with comments about
  =me "wimping" out and all, and everything else, but I've gotten used to your
  =stupidity over the monthes.  
But since then, there came another month of arguments ....

  =It is clear that my feelings on the subject were that the call was fine.  
  =You have had a good time trying to pick lines apart to try and "prove" 
  =that I said something, but I am reminding myself of the point of.."who 
  =cares"???   Ok, obviously, I did for quite a while, but I no longer do...  
  =Think what you like, you will anyway."
Well, glad to see that after two months of flame war, you no longer do
care my picking your lines ... How did your smartness appear/disappear all
in a sudden?

>Nope.. after seeing replies like:
>"Good job Meeks, Ed just doesn't know when to quit"
>"Man, doesn't he ever admit he's wrong" etc...
>I didn't need to do a survey...
Oh, is that it? then the statements

   "Does anyone out there realize he (Meeks)'s wrong?"
   "SO WHAT, he (Meeks) screws up. big deal"
   
must have been evidence on the net that I abuse you. But no sweat,
only a wimp needs emotional support from the net. I consider having you 

-- "quit because I am too tired/too intelligent to argue" after a month of 
    argument, 
-- yet then go right back and argue again because you are still smarting
   at such a wimp out 
-- your repeated lying of quit/unquit/quit/unquit ....
-- and of course, when out of arguments, has to resort to obscenities. 
   That's the sign of losing an argument ....
-- your threat to ask my postmaster for help yet have no guts to do it ...

the real abuse.

>Hmm..  and what was your excuse last time... oh yeah... "I don't post in
>the basketball groups when the season hasn't started yet..." or something
>to that effect.  
Right, something to that effect, you care to quote the exact statement?
Seems like you fabricate lies again. When did I say I'll definitely post in
r.s.basketball right after the season started? How can I when there is
so much excitement in r.s.football.

Apparently you miss my abuse in basketball, and wander to r.s.football.pro
to get your psychological treatment.

-- 
                                          Edward Lor
                                          lor@cbnewsk.att.com
                                          
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro