HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cleveland 24, Houston 14
Date: 11 Nov 92 06:25:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: devnull.2847
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <1992Nov10.192601.29056@macc.wisc.edu> (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>What you really mean is that Johnson demonstrates his emotions publically 
>and Pardee does not.  This does not mean Pardee does not maintain 
>discipline.

Well, no, that's not what I mean.  Johnson does show his emotions, but not
in the way that, say, Jerry Glanville does.  That is, the players were
saying how all Saturday during practice at the Silverdome everyone was
walking on tiptoes around Johnson, because he was so mad at Irvin.
As for the punishment being too light, I think this is the point where
the players respect him -- it was a standard fine and benching.   The
same would have happened to any player on the team.

In contrast, Oiler players (in particular, Ray Childress) have openly been
saying that Pardee does not or can not maintain discipline on the team;
that that is the biggest problem they have.  When the *players* are saying
they want more discipline, you gotta think there's a problem.

Daniel Welch
From: juvan@ct90.med.ge.com (Andy Juvan 5-5060)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Status of Jeff Graham (Pitts) and Barry Word (KC)?
Date: 9 Nov 92 22:50:39 GMT
Reply-To: juvan@ct90.UUCP (Andy Juvan 5-5060)
Organization: GE Medical Systems - CT, New Berlin, WI


	Can anyone tell me what has happened to Jeff Graham, the young
WR of the Steelers. After 4 games he was among the AFC leaders in
receptions and yards. Since then I haven't seen his name much in the
stats, and not at all this week. IS he hurt or did he lose his starting
status?

	Also, is Barry Word hurt? I know he had a bad thigh bruise or
something, but I thought he was expected to play this week. 

	Thanks in advance for any info.
From: cs92aja@cen.ex.ac.uk (A.J.Amsel)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Seahawks are back (NOT)
Date: 9 Nov 92 10:28:47 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: Computer Unit. - University of Exeter. UK

We scored 3 !!!
They scored more !!!
We lost !!!
Nothing ever changes does it.
Still, some  Washington fan must be able to send me a match report although
I have now found about 5 other Seattle fans on the planet. Keep writing please.

Who knows, next year Seattle may win 2 matches in a season !!!

SHUT UP - Let me dream in peace
--




            
  
           AAA       LLL          EEEEEEEEE     XXX       XXX
         AA   AA     LLL          EEEEEEEEE      XXX     XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE             XXX   XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE              XXX XXX
        AAAAAAAAA    LLL          EEEEEEEEE         XXXXX
        AAAAAAAAA    LLL          EEE              XXX XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE             XXX   XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLLLLLLLL    EEEEEEEEE      XXX     XXX
       AAAA   AAAA   LLLLLLLLL    EEEEEEEEE     XXX       XXX

       - A.J.Amsel@exeter.ac.uk.cen

` And remember kids : - Incorrect use of a 
                        Fire extinguisher can 
                        seriously damage 
                        your Genitals        '

(C) Alex Amsel Designs Inc. 1992
` Beware the Ides of March - T'was the date of my birth.... '











--
From: rlcarr@animato.network23.com (Rich Carreiro)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Team bests/worsts (PATRIOTS)
Distribution: world
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 1.16f (10.17.92) by Mike Schwartz & Michael B. Smith
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:44:30 EDT
Organization: The Other Side of Life

Bests:
1) winning the '85 AFC title in the Orange Bowl in a demolition.
2) Steve Grogan (in the following year) finally QBing the Pats to
   a win in the Orange Bowl, after a career of losses there.  This
   was also the last pro game (not counting Hurricanes' games) there.

Worsts:
1) getting screwed over by Ben Drieth vs. Oakland in '76.
2) 1990
3) 1992

-- 
Rich Carreiro                                  Home: (401)841-8514
rlcarr@animato.network23.com
uunet.uu.net!animato!rlcarr
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: aww@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (AWW)
Subject: Game Stats
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, England
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 12:55:18 GMT

I play Quarterback for the college team here "WARWICK WOLVES". The problem
I have is that we want to colllect our stats as each game goes on, but it 
is a really complicated process and countless plays and tackles etc get lost.
I would apppreciate it if someone could mail me or post a methodical way of
collecting stats, it would make life a lot easier for our stats man.

		Thanks in advance,

		Andrew Wilson

!!GO DOLPHINS!!
From: pc0837@sarah.albany.edu (COHEN PAUL L)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Koontz Computer Predictions Week 10
Keywords: computer predictions, picks
Date: 10 Nov 92 14:46:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: sarah.1992Nov10.144620.28263
Distribution: rec
Organization: State University of New York at Albany

STUFF DELETED

In article <1253@fozzy.UUCP> ckoontz@fozzy.UUCP (Carl H. Koontz) writes:
>I have been working on some NFL prediction software and I thought I
>would share my information with you.  I have been monitoring my results
>so far this year and through the first half of the season my algorithm
>is 83-29 against the spread.
>
>Here are my picks for this week
>
>Dallas  3
>Detroit 31
>

>Minnesota 10
>Tampa Bay 38
>
>New Orleans  13
>New England  14
>
>Cleveland 13
>Houston   24
>
>LA Raiders  14
>Philadelphia 17
>
>Miami        23
>Indianapolis 24
>
>
>Washington  3
>Seattle     7
>
>NY Jets    24
>Denver     20
>

>San Francisco  40
>Atlanta        41
>
>Comments welcome.
>
>Carl

Carl, you had some winners, although those are deleted from this response,
but I wonder how your program can pick Seattle over Washington.
Also, Detroit blows out Dallas?????  How did your program come out
with that?
You say you are 83 - 29 against the spread, that's great!!!! But there are
obviously major flaws in your program.

just my thoughts.
Paul
From: htilney@vax.clarku.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: RE: Some Foster guy ????
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:50:51 GMT
Organization: Clark University


In a previous article, rfedkiw@crenshaw.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) wrote:
>Everyone knows who Thomas, Sanders, and E. Smith are.....
>But lately I've heard a lot of wind on some Pittsburgh back.
>Well it looked like the AFC back showdown was this weekend:
>Pitt vs. Buff
>Now we heard how Thomas did, but what about Froster????

Thurman Thomas (Mr. self-proclaimed Michael Jordan of football) had a great
day, no doubt about it, but Foster didn't do badly either. That swing-out 
play where he caught the ball with one hand, avoided Bennett, regained his
momentum from a three-point-stance and went on to gain about ten more yards
was amazing. Thomas was awesome, but nothing he did topped that in terms 
of effort.

>A plan is made by someone who is sitting and thinking ...
>while others are doing.

Uh, yeah. Right.

Bart
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: New Orleans question
Date: 11 Nov 92 06:24:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: ncsu.1992Nov11.062426.7745
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Originator: delarocq@c00167-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu



 Philadelphia (13-15) and San Fransisco (10-16).

 They are the only two victors over the Saints.. :)
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   

   __                     _         __      _  _      /
  /  )      /)  /)       //        /  )    // //     /
 /--<  . . //  //  __.  // __     /--<  o // // _   '
/___/_(_/_//__//__(_/|_</_(_)    /___/_<_</_</_/_) o
         />  />
        </  </

Reporter: "Who do you think is the best running back in the NFL?"
Thurman Thomas: "The running back that went to Oklahoma State".
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Organization: University of Michigan
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 22:48:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.210655.23245@asl.dl.nec.com> nix@aslslc43.asl.dl.nec.com (David Nix) writes:

   > Agreed.  Emmitt is king stud #1, most importantly because he does it behind
   > such a low quality OL.

   The Dallas offensive line may not be the NFL's greatest, but they are far from
   low quality.  Center Mark Stepnoski is considered to be among the best in the
   NFL, and Newton and Tuinei are highly regarded around the league.

Actually, from what I've read this year, the Dallas OL is widely considered
one of the leagues best.  So it shouldn't surprise anybody that one of the
top backs, running behind one of the top lines, is having a great year.
Should it?


Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kester@mte.ncsu.edu (Dan Kester)
Subject: Re: Upcoming Draft
Organization: North Carolina State University
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 22:42:23 GMT

In article <97179@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
writes:
>Hi,
>
>I thought I'd start a new thread:  here are some players I see going in the
>first round of the upsoming draft (provided there is a draft) and the teams
>that may take them:
>
>1- Drew Bledsoe (Wash St.) Tampa Bay needs a QB real bad! Wyche has shown a
>	great amount of interest in him.
	Unless the Bucs can trade for the pick, expect the Seahawks to take the local
man.
>2- Garrison Hearst (Georgia) The Falcons need him, they should take him so
>	Monday's game doesn't happen next season.
	No, the falcons need a new offensive scheme, some TEs, and maybe a few
line-men.  They've drafted RBs in the last two 1st rounds, but you can't get
yards if there are no holes.
>3- Lincoln Kennedy (U of Wash) Jets sure could use him on what I see as one of
>	their weakest points: the O line.
	Yep.  But Hearst would look good here, also.  Thomas is a bust.
>4- Dimitrius Debose (Notre Dame) Oh please Oh please let the GIANTS get him!!
>5- Rick Mirer (Notre Dame) Can't see any other losing team needing a QB.
>	He'd certainly would be welcome on the Saints but Heberts doing 
>	well for himself.
	How about Tampa Bay, if Bledsoe is gone.
>
>
>Anyone else think of others??
>
>satish nair
>go giants
>
>
	How about Faulk to someone?  Maybe Phoenix?

Bill Perry

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bdb@controls.ccd.harris.com (Bill D. Buckalew)
Subject: Deion, Deion, Deion
Originator: bdb@rs2
Organization: Harris Controls
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 20:00:05 GMT


Does anyone know if Deion is expected to play tonight?  Look for 
J. Rice to have less than 3 receptions and under 25 yards if Prime
Time plays, and the Falcons to stomp the 'niners at home 
in the dome.

"Elvis lives" -- Jerry Glanville
From: k_mullin@oz.plymouth.edu (Keith J. Mullins)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: New Orleans question
Date: 10 Nov 92 04:35:19 GMT
Organization: Plymouth State College -- Plymouth, NH



	Anyone know who the two teams are that beat the Saints?  

 K-->


-- 
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
| Keith J. Mullins	    |
| k_mullin.oz.plymouth.edu  | 
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: markl@spuddy.uucp (Mark Liversedge)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: * dolphins lose again!
Date: 8 Nov 92 19:04:04 GMT
Organization: Spuddy's Public Usenet Domain

In article <1992Nov5.084800.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>>>> ciao,                             
>>>> Jason Bittle (bittle@canisius.edu) 
>>>> (a.k.a. Pillsbury Dough Boy )
>>>
>>>           By the way, Mr. Bittle are you sure enough of your team to
>>>back it up? Talk is cheap. See THE BET II. I still believe at 6-2.
>>>
>>>
>>>                           -doug THE dolfan-
>> 
>> Oh for gods sake! GROW UP! What is all this childish "THE BET" shit?
>> 
>> Get a life.,
>
>    So, I'll take it that you still wont back up what you're saying?
>Does this mean I don't have a life? Are you trying to change the subject?
>If I loose THE BET II, I will accept it. I don't think I will though. I
>don't want to argue with you about this, but you must have some reason
>for not betting. I know from what I've read you think Buffalo will win so
>maybe there is another reason, or your just saying this and you don't
>believe in it enough to put your woofing rights on the line.
>
>                            -doug THE dolfan-
>                            

I posted this article, who exactly is cl129424?
My name is markl@spuddy, and I aint never ranted about the Bills.
(Not this season anyway).

I'm in on the bet if it really makes you happy.

-- 

 * Meeeow ! Call Spuddy on (0203) 638780/638693 for FREE mail & Usenet access *
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Frisco-Atlanta
Date: 10 Nov 1992 17:33:32 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

If anyone has a paper handy, could they please post or Email me all the
scores from Monday's game and the stats for Watters, B. Jones and Rison.
It would be greatly appreciated!

thanks,

--salty

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cowboys Versus 9ers
Date: 12 Nov 1992 00:13:06 GMT
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu


In article <BxKrI8.FKs@ns1.nodak.edu> sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan ) writes:
|
...
|Again, I will give the edge to the 9ers against the Cowboys
|and I feel that the SF will win its 5th SB.
|
|Where does it leave the Vikes and the Saints. I honestly
|feel that both these teams do not have the offence to
|make it deep into the playoffs.

The saints will win against the niners on sunday, since they have a
more consistent, if inferior team. If you think the niners can make it
to the superbowl, you should be equally nice to the Saints.

-- 
"There is nothing in the marginal conditions that     
    distinguish a mountain from a mole hill"            
                      Kenneth Boulding                             

					All comments  are mine---(David Wright) 
						david@cats.ucsc.edu.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pichocki@nbrwh34.bnr.ca (Stephen Pichocki)
Subject: Re: Am I the only Seattle fan ?
Organization: Northern Telecom, Bramalea, Canada
Distribution: rec
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 92 20:02:18 GMT


  
           AAA       LLL          EEEEEEEEE     XXX       XXX
         AA   AA     LLL          EEEEEEEEE      XXX     XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE             XXX   XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE              XXX XXX
        AAAAAAAAA    LLL          EEEEEEEEE         XXXXX
        AAAAAAAAA    LLL          EEE              XXX XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLL          EEE             XXX   XXX
        AAA   AAA    LLLLLLLLL    EEEEEEEEE      XXX     XXX
       AAAA   AAAA   LLLLLLLLL    EEEEEEEEE     XXX       XXX

___________________________________________________________________________

Alex,

You are among the few. No one!!!! likes Seattle, in fact, given the choice
between an info-mercial and a Seahwaks game, I would go jogging.



Regards,

Stephen Pichocki
Northern Telecom
Customer Service Marketing
Software Services
BUS   (416) 452-2391  FAX   (416) 452-4783   ESN   333-2391
Internet:  pichocki@bnr.ca
Envoy: [Stephen Pichocki]bnr
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: brucek@Ingres.COM (Bruce Kleinman)
Subject: Re: Packers 7 - Giants 27 (Packer fan perspective)
Organization: Ingres, an ASK Company, Alameda CA 94501
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:25:30 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.162826.17540@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>I don't know what to say about Favre's performance.  He threw 3 INTs 
>when the Packers were within reach (only 6 pnts behind) in the final 4 
>minutes.  Still, 27-44 is over 60%.  If you're more concerned about 
>his development as a QB than about the final score you'd say he had a 
>pretty good day.

I'm a Giants fan, and I felt very, very fortunate to win this game.  The
Packers clearly outplayed the Giants.  But Favre was not as impressive 
as the stats would indicate.  He didn't seem to throw deep well at
all.  The Giants defensive game plan seemed to be conceding short
passes over the middle the whole game, and the Packers continually
cashed in on that.

As to the interceptions, they began almost immediately after Favre took
a huge hit from Pepper Johnson, one of the few times he was hit hard
all day.  Favre was very much off his game after that.

>
>Another interesting thing, Reyna Thompson of the Giants intercepted a 
>pass in the flats and ran it back 69 yards for a TD.  Right before the 
>play, Max McGee, who does the color commentary for the Packer radio 
>network, said "I hope it's not another pass into the flats."  I think 
>Holmgren was getting a *little* bit predictable.  The Packers have a 
>Offensive Director of Quality Control who's supposed to spot trends 
>like this and inform Holmgren if he's calling one play too much.
>

I wouldn't argue offensive philosophy with McGee, but all game long I
was remarking how well-balanced and well-mixed the Packer's O seemed.
If Holmgren fell into a pattern at the end, that's somewhat
understandable, since although the game was within reach, time was
running out quick, and Sharpe was the obvious go-to guy.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: c1h3384@rigel.tamu.edu
Subject: No excuses, man (Re: in defense of Lin Elliott)
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords: Cowboys
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 17:27:00 GMT

In article <lfj5l3INN9an@earth.cs.utexas.edu>, joel@cs.utexas.edu (Joel Daniel Just) writes...
> 
>Lin Elliott is not as bad as everyone says he is, IMHO.
>He is the classic example of a power kicker who lacks accuracy -- the exact
>opposite of Ken Willis.
>On Sunday, vs. the Eagles, Elliott missed two makeable attempts, 
>but notice that
>neither attempt was short; both were wide.  He did convert two attempts,
>including a 48-yarder.  Earlier in the year, he converted a 51-yarder.
>Still, 2 out of 4, while not good, is still OK.
> 

Oh, man, a rookie with a 8 out of 16 percentage, one of the worst of all
   time, is a good kicker? I do not care about if he is a power kicker
   or whatever, but IMHO, it really does not matter if the kick is
   short or wide. Neither would count anyway.

Speaking about his power, let us see, I think the Eagles game was
   about the only game that he did a good job on kickoffs. I remembered
   for the previous several games, his kicks were *ALWAYS* way short,
   with the exception of preseason games. 

>One important aspect of his game that many people overlook is his kickoffs.
>In the Eagles game, I believe all 5 of his kickoffs were touchbacks.  It
>doesn't show up in the stats that he may have prevented Sikahema from making
>several long kickoff returns.
> 
>It is true that the Cowboys haven't won or lost any games on an Elliott
>field goal attempt.  If the Superbowl came down to a last second field
>goal attempt, like Norwood's when Buffallo lost to the Giants, would you
>rather have Elliott or Willis try the kick?  If it was a 47-yard attempt,
>like Norwood's, I would probably rather have Elliott.

I would definitely use a better kicker, better than Willis, and better
    then Elliott, of course. I believe that the Cowboys will be more than
    happy if they can get one. The question is then, is there any better
    kicker around? Better find one, if you wanna win SB in 92.

Bob

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: wl@atlas.wustl.edu (Wilson Lee)
Subject: Re: sick Young
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 20:26:16 GMT


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: Re: Eric Green Suspended
Originator: delarocq@c00522-118rd.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 01:41:45 GMT




  Why does Pittsburgh start doing so well, and drugs have to mess up
 their season?? That is so stupid!! What, was he influenced by Worley??
 This to me is so sickening. I am just stunned. Although I am a Bills fan,
 I keep up with Pitt too, because I used to live there also... This kind
 of news at a time when Pitt is doing so well :(

 It's just so frustrating... Stupid drugs in the NFL.....
 

 
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   

   __                     _         __      _  _      /
  /  )      /)  /)       //        /  )    // //     /
 /--<  . . //  //  __.  // __     /--<  o // // _   '
/___/_(_/_//__//__(_/|_</_(_)    /___/_<_</_</_/_) o
         />  />
        </  </

Reporter: "Who do you think is the best running back in the NFL?"
Thurman Thomas: "The running back that went to Oklahoma State".
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!)
Subject: Re: Lawrence Taylor
Organization: Yale University
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 15:00:13 GMT

In article <Mf03Hjm00WBKI6Jawn@andrew.cmu.edu> Scott Michael White <sw36+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 17:17:19 -0500 
>From: Scott Michael White <sw36+@andrew.cmu.edu>
>Subject: Re: Lawrence Taylor
>    It's a sad day for Giants fans.  Lawrence Taylor thank you for many
>great seasons.  You're the best!!!!
>

Can someone with some time collect LT's career stats and post them.
I'd love to get a look at the number of sacks he has had over the years or 
who he sacked the most.

...sniff... sniff.... WAAAAaaaa
I miss him already    :-(
 
Who will be our captain?  Who will lead our defense?  Is there a support 
group for us Giants fan????

I would be EXTREMELY grateful if someone could take the time to find the 
info.

Adriene L. Nazaretian            G         Nazaretian-Adriene@Yale.Edu
Sr Technical Specialist       G  I         Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.CIS.YALE.EDU
Computing and Info Systems    O  A         Adriene@YALEADS.BITNET
Yale University                  N         Adriene@YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU
175 Whitney Avenue               T         Voice (203) 432-6683
New Haven, CT. 06520             S         FAX  (203) 432-6165
From: gilford@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Gilford T. Hapanyengwi)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Randall benched for WEEK TEN
Date: 3 Nov 92 04:14:26 GMT
Organization: Vanderbilt University CS Dept.

In article <Bx4Ctw.Ht7@acsu.buffalo.edu> v073pzuy@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Face In The Sky) writes:

   Yes, Rich Kotite announced that Jimmie Mac will be the starting QB for this
   week's game against the Raiders.  Randall is something like 5 for 23 in his
   last 4 quarters of action...

   No, I'm *not* making this up...

					   ---CHZ
******************************************************************************
I would like to hear the comments of people regarding Randall's
benching.  How do think this is going to affect the team's Chemistry
and is this going to motivate or detruct from better performance.

Ndiyoyo,
--
<><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><<>><>
Gilford T. Hapanyengwi       |To avoid lying, do not tell
(615) 322-3552               |the whole truth.
gilford@vuse.vanderbilt.edu  |
hapanyg@vuctrvax.bitnet      |