HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 10:06:52 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Kevin Corkum <KWC8CHC@UOTTAWA.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: LAN Question
              16 Dec 1992 16:48:40 GMT from <umds@POOL.SUNYIT.EDU>

The difference between a workgroup mgr and a supervisor:

A system supervisor has many responsibilities, and other than answering wordper
fect questions, I think the most dreaded task is user management.  There is not
enough hours in the day to perform all the directory creating, password changin
...   A work group manager is created by the supervisor and that manager become
s a "supervisor" of the group that the manager is assigned to.  He/she can crea
te/delete users that he/she has domain over, as well as assign rights and TDA
in the directories they are assigned to.  For example: Say that you run a 100
user network, 25 of those are from the accounting section located in the baseme
nt.  You find the most computer knowledgeable person down there and give them
workgroup manager status for the accounting section.  Therefore any accounting
pers. that forget passwords, need more disk space... can be handled by this
person and not you.  AND you don't need to have supervisor equivalents all over
 the place.


kevin Corkum
kwc8chc@uottawa
kwc8chc@acadvm1.uottawa.ca
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 16:51:56 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Brad Clements <bkc@MURKWORKS.COM>
Subject:      Re: PMail/Disk Quotas and Charon
              16 Dec 92 13:44:19 EST." <9212161917.AA19644@uu2.psi.com>

Regarding ownership of messages delivered by Charon...

Incoming SMTP messages will be owned by the Charon Print Server object.

Novell messages received from and delivered to the same server will
be owned by the sender of the message. This was done to ensure that
crafty students wouldn't mail large files to themselves in an effort
to temporarily increase their quota.

Brad Clements, CCP             bkc@murkworks.com               (315)265-4717
NLMs Galore - free demos: ftp.msen.com:pub/vendor/murkworks    (315)268-9812 Fax
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Monash University
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Priority: normal
X-pmrqc:      1
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 09:18:04 GMT+1000
Reply-To:     Stephen.Dart@cc.monash.edu.au
From:         Stephen Dart <Stephen.Dart@CC.MONASH.EDU.AU>
Subject:      Re: PMail/Disk Quotas and Charon

> > >  I have a few profs who regularly do mailings to their class lists.  THe
> > > problem is that some students don't read their mail.  The mail is owned by
> > > the sender until it is read, and the faculty are exceeding their disk
> > > quotas.  What can be done other than searching out the culprits?
>
> >I would recommend the use of a CHARON gateway so that all the mail
> >goes via the gateway and then the delivered stuff owned by the
> >recipient.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but with Charon 3.4, Charon is the owner of
> the newmail until the message is read, does 4.0 work differently?

I just did a check with NDIR on my unread mail. It is owned my CHARON.
I am running charon 4.0.

______________________________________________________________________
Stephen A Dart, Monash University Computer Centre, Victoria, Australia
Head of MICROS          Voice:+61 (3)565-4786   FAX(G3):+61(3)565-4746
Stephen.Dart@cc.monash.edu.au             steved@ccs1.cc.monash.edu.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Popmail-Charset: English
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 12:27:35 MST
Reply-To:     rbrown@slinky.UnivNorthCo.EDU
From:         Rich Brown <rbrown@SLINKY.UNIVNORTHCO.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Current versions of BOOTPD, FTPD,...

On Fri, 11 Dec 1992 09:41:58 GMT, NILS HENRIK TVETENE wrote:

>In article <MAILQUEUE-101.921208123136.416@vision> Michal Meloun
><MELOUN@VISION.FELK.CVUT.CS> writes:
>>Date:         Tue, 8 Dec 1992 12:31:36 CET
>>From:         Michal Meloun <MELOUN@VISION.FELK.CVUT.CS>
>>Subject:      Current versions of BOOTPD, FTPD,...
>>Thanks to everybody for enjoying my BOOTPD!
>>
>>I'd like to announce that the current versions of NLM's available at the
>>anonymous FTP "novell.felk.cvut.cs" in directory "pub/nw311" are:
>>
>>BOOTPD       1.7
>>FINGERD      1.1
>>FTPD         1.5,   1.6 coming in two or three days
>>RESOLV       1.3    (needed for FTPD and BOOTPD)
>
>I've tried the resolv.nlm and bootpd.nlm, and it worked fine for 10 minutes,
>then.....Abend! The server crashed!
>
>We're running NW3.11 NW4MAC 3.01 and NW/NFS. I really want this to work, so
>any help would be very much appreciated!
>
>
>This is the config file I was using:
>
>#
>#       This is sample BOOTPD.CFG file
>#
>#
>#       Hosts file specification
>#
>
># HostsFile     sys:system/hosts.cfg
>
>#
>#       Board configuration
>#
>
>Board   158.36.33.11
>  Gateway       158.36.33.1
>  DynStart      158.36.33.65
>  DynRange      10
>  TimeLive      1
>
>
>
>
>
>Please mail me directly.
>
>Nils Tvetene
>nilsht@dhhalden.no
>
>==========================================================================
>Nils Henrik Tvetene        -====-----------          NilsHT@dhhalden.no
>   Consultant              -----------====-            Ostfold College
> Tlf -47-9-185400          ------====------           Fax -47-9-185485
>==========================================================================

An older version fo the FTP NLM (1.3 I think) also killed our server after
about 10 minutes with a message about "error running process FTPD.NLM...).
I haven't had time to mess with it yet and find out the problem, though -
just took it off and left it off for now.

The Murkworks (commercial) one worked fine for us until the demo expired.
Of course we are too poor to buy the real one (even though it isn't
terribly expensive).
Rich Brown
rbrown@slinky.univnorthco.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Mon, 14 Dec 1992 15:43:22 MST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         lw_flw@LEWIS.UMT.EDU
Subject:      UPS for Novell 3.11

The power went out twice this past week.

What kind of Uninterruptable Power Supply unit is recommended
for a Novell 3.11 386 server?

Thanks for your suggestion.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: The Ohio State University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 10:22:22 -0500
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Stephen I Miller <similler@MAGNUS.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: 32meg and Scsi express

In article <MAILQUEUE-101.921215130646.416@noc.niu.edu> you write:
>-=>    I sent a mail before for a problem concerning memory above 16 meg.
>-=> It seems now that the problem comes from SCSI express that has a separate
>-=> driver for adaptec 1540. So i am not able to load aha1540 with the correct
>-=> fixes to use 32 meg. The last aha1540 provides an option for mem above
> 16meg..
>-=> The problem is now : where to find the updates for SCSI express?
>
>Call the company (Micro Design). I had a problem with the version we
>bought and they let me download the new version from their BBS. Your
>milage may vary...
>

Or you can just send email to Micro Design International at
74736.3627@compuserve.com.
--

*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
Name:       Steve Miller           |  The Ohio State University
Internet:   STEVE-MILLER+@OSU.EDU  |  Academic Computing Services
CompuServe: 76702,1522             |  Rm. 406 Baker Systems
Phone:      614-292-4843           |  1971 Neil Avenue
FAX:        614-292-7081           |  Columbus, Ohio 43210-1210
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 11:36:00 CST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         CSVCDAH@NNOMED.BITNET
Subject:      Re: Patching Netware 3.11 - Which Patches?

From  Andy K.:                                                          vm
> I recently grabbled Novell's 311pt9.ZIP, so that I could patch our
> newly installed NW 3.11.  ...
> ...
> Is this okay?  Any problems?  I am simply unsure about patching NW 3.11,
> and Novell won't give me a straight answer.  I didn't find any info on
> this question in the FAQs either.

  May I add to this question ...?  When I get the 311pt9 disk, is that
  all patches up to the date the disk was issued, or do I also have to
  look at pt1-pt8. (ie is pt9 inclusive of all previous patches?)...

Thanks,
Dan Henry               __o
CSVCDAH@NNOMED        _ \<,_
LSU Medical Center   (_)/ (_)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <MIKE@larse.com>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 18 Dec 1992 16:18:00 LCL
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "Tisdell, Mike" <MIKE@LARSE.COM>
Subject:      Re: Server problems running SAL

12MB of ram may not be enough, check the percentage of availble cache
buffers.

Here's the basic info:
 NetWare 386 v3.11 (250 user version)
 PS/2 Model 80 - 12MB RAM
 IBM PS/2 SCSI Controller (using PS2SCSI.DSK driver - dated 2/12/91)
 HP 1 GB hard drive
 IBM token ring adapter
 3Com 3C527 Ethernet controller

                             Mike Tisdell    email: mike@larse.com
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 21:24:35 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         RBOYER2 <rboyer2@IUS.INDIANA.EDU>
Subject:      OS/2 and Bindfix

          Greetings,

          I have a copy of the OS/2 requester for NetWare and noticed
          that it comes with Bindfix.  Our servers have VERY LARGE
          Binderies (we have 9,000+ users defined on two servers.)
          This puts the Bindery at 10+MB and the DOS version of
          Bindfix runs out of memory on checks for duplicate objects,
          etc.

          My question is:  Will the OS/2 version do a better job of
          checking the Bindery (i.e. be able to check all the
          objects/their back link properties/etc)?

          I would try this myself, but Bindfixes take 14+ hours and
          these are production servers (till semester break that is.)
          I know NetWare 3.11 was not meant to have this many users
          defined, but I didn't design this LAN; I was just given it.

          Thanks for your great insight and Happy Holidays!! - Rick

    +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Richard L. Boyer                                     (812) 941-2287 |
    | Operations Supervisor/Programmer & Associate Network Administrator  |
    | Indiana University Southeast | IUS LAN Mail: Rick                   |
    | Computer Services, CV-030    |  Bitnet Mail: Rboyer@Indiana         |
    | 4201 Grant Line Road         |Internet Mail: Rboyer@Indiana.Edu     |
    | New Albany, IN  47150 USA    |                                      |
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
    |->  Two wrongs do not a right make, but three lefts do! - Wes Rose <-|
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 10:17:18 -0800
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Brian Olson <olson@CSUFRES.CSUFRESNO.EDU>
Subject:      Connection Info...

A quick question for you NW gurus (I know you're out there)...
(Sorry if this is posted more than once--having some trouble
with the mailer here).

I'm running Netware 3.11 20-user.  When I make the NLM call
GetMaximumNumberOfStations(), it says I have 120 maximum
connections.  (same goes for GetServerInformation() ).  I think
I remember a brief mention about this on the list before, but after
searching 20Meg+ of archives to no avail...

Are the extra 100 connections "phantom" connections used by NLMs
to talk to the OS?  If so, are 100 connections reserved on other
NW versions as well (2.x, 3.x, 4.0) and for 5-user, 10-user, 100-user,
etc. ?

Thanks in advance for any wisdom you might impart...

Brian Olson
olson@csufres.csufresno.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: RWILSON@squid.stmarys.ca (Randy Wilson)
Subject: looking to fix what bindfix will not
Summary: bindfix fails need utils
Keywords: bindfix, bindery, netware system utils
Organization: Saint Mary's University
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:27:18 GMT

A few weeks ago I ran bindfix on my 3.11 server and as usual it came up
with the error not enough memory while checking for duplicate
objects. It also came up with some new errors 23 and 1??. When it
finished it said Bindfix failed!

I have been thinking about Bindscan and Dumpuser. I could use
dumpuser to create a makeuser file for all the users and then give
everyone their trustee rights with doctored output from Bindscan. 
Of course all users will loose their passwords.. 
and their mail directories.. 

This does not look good.

Any advice on what to do to get the binderary fixed? 
Third party utilities?
I have heard of Quick utils from

 
Verlag Wolfgang Schreiber-Neumann
Schanzenstr. 74
D-4000 Dusseldorf 11
Germany
Fax: (+49) 211 554696
QUICK costs $199. 


What about Cheyenne utils? 

Thanks a mil
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-NUPop-Charset: English
Return-Receipt-To: shathaway@[192.33.12.1]
X-Envelope-to: novell@suvm.acs.syr.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Fri, 18 Dec 1992 15:45:52 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "Stephen B. Hathaway" <shathaway@[192.33.12.1]>
Subject:      OS/2 list

Is there an os/2 list similar to this one? anyone know if there are PD unix
utilities for it?(notably lpd, ftpd, etc.)

ThaNX.
Stephen B. Hathaway, Laboratory Manager, School of Natural Science
Hampshire College, Amherst, MA  01001
shathaway@hamp.hampshire.edu
(413) 549-4600 x774
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Yale University School of Medicine
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-mailer:     Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R3).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:07:27 -0400
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Rick Beebe <RBEEBE@SURGERY.MED.YALE.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Patching Netware 3.11 - Which Patches?

>I recently grabbled Novell's 311pt9.ZIP, so that I could patch our
>newly installed NW 3.11.  The readme file in the archive mentions
>that one should install patches ONLY FOR PROBLEMS WHICH ARE BEING
>EXPERIENCED.  The problem is that I rather not wait to experience
>some of the problems which are being patched (like FAT corruption).
>
>After having called Novell, they wanted $150 for a simple "Yes" (install
>all of the patches) or "No", so I gave up on that.  A friend of mine
>told me to go ahead and install all of the patches, and so I did (all
>of those relating to the installation -- no MAC or NFS patches, for
>example).  This includes PATCHMAN and FATFIX and most others.
>
>Is this okay?  Any problems?  I am simply unsure about patching NW 3.11,
>and Novell won't give me a straight answer.  I didn't find any info on
>this question in the FAQs either.

I hesitated on this one too, back when I got 311pt3. I decided that I'd
rather not experience most of the problems described so I went ahead and
installed them. So far I haven't had any problems that I can attribute to
them. I've upgraded through some of the versions and am now at 9. Again, no
problems. I do read the descriptions provided, however, and don't apply
patches I don't need. For example, you don't need AFPFIX (I think that's
what it's called) if you've upgraded to 3.01 of Netware for Mac.


  ......................................................................
   Rick Beebe                                            (203) 785-4566
   Data Network Operations
   Biomedical Computing Unit                  beebe@biomed.med.yale.edu
   Yale University School of Medicine              beebe@yalemed.bitnet
  ......................................................................
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <berry@kermit.csd.scarolina.edu>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 11:32:06 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Berry Mobley <berry@KERMIT.CSD.SCAROLINA.EDU>
Subject:      Re: how many use shareware to run their colleges e-mail system?

Well, Pegasus and Charon are the _Predominant_ lan mail packages on campus,
but basically each sysadm is free to choose what he or she wants.

We've got 42 netware servers on the backbone as of the last slist.

Good luck.

Berry
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 10:24:17 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
From:         TCHODGD@VCCSCENT.BITNET

Would it be possible for me to purchase a student manual for the
following:

505: v3.11 Systems Manager

from someone on the list.  I really don't want to buy another
set of red books.

Any offers out there?

David Hodge               <tchodgd@vccscent.bitnet>
Systems Librarian
Tidewater CC
VA Beach, VA
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:55:10 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         gene <GS6206@ALBNYVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: UPS for Novell 3.11
              14 Dec 1992 15:43:22 MST from <lw_flw@LEWIS.UMT.EDU>

  We use an APC back-UPS 1200VX.  so far, we are very happy
with it.  We have Novell 3.11 on a zenith 386/33e.
   Gene Shackman
   LAN supervisor
   Department of Sociology
   SUNY at Albany

On Mon, 14 Dec 1992 15:43:22 MST <lw_flw@LEWIS.UMT.EDU> said:
>What kind of Uninterruptable Power Supply unit is recommended
>for a Novell 3.11 386 server?
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
From: RWILSON@squid.stmarys.ca (Randy Wilson)
Subject: Re: looking to fix what bindfix will not
Summary: bindfix fails need utils
Keywords: bindfix, bindery, netware system utils
Organization: Saint Mary's University
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 20:57:22 GMT

As a follow up on the bind fix problem; I have called the Novell Tech 
support line and there is a version of Bindfix compiled for the large 
memory model. It is called BNDFIX.ZIP 37853 bytes in size. I do not have 
access to Netwire.. any one have a copy of this FTPable. I checked Archie ..


Looks kike I will have to rebuild the bindary from scratch. 
Boy I sure know how to have fun.... NOT!

randy 
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Encoding: 17 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 (beta-2)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 10:05:00 PST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         FBOLANDH@OCGA.UCLA.EDU
Subject:      NW 3.11 and PSERVER.NLM

Hi Novellers:

I have two servers with NW 3.11 and run PSERVER.NLM dated 7/10/91.
Occasionally, I receive a report from our users that their printer is not
working, remote printers in this case, and once server's local printer.  When
I check the print queues, I notice that the printer in NOT CONNECTED.  I
simply unload the PSERVER and re-load it back.  Then the connection is made.

Does anyone have this problem?  If so, what is the solution?
Thanks in advance for your help.

Fariba Bolandhemat ,  fbolandh@ocga.ucla.edu
UCLA Office of Contracts & Grants
Via: uk.ac.manchester.computer-science; Thu, 17 Dec 1992 13:03:53 +0000
X-Disclaimer: Any opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect
X-Disclaimer: those of Barclays Bank Plc.
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v2.3 (R4).
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 12:20:54 GMT
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Rod Wilson <Rod.Wilson@BARCLAYS.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: LAN Question

> Could anyone help me answer a question.  How does a work group manager
> differs in his/her abilities to manage users from the server supervisor
> under Netware 3.11.  What limitations exist for a work group manager?
>
He cannot reset intruder detection lockouts. He can only manage
users/groups that he has created/or been assigned manager of.



Rod.Wilson@barclays.co.uk      "My opinions are my own
Barclays Bank Plc               and do not reflect those
England                         of my company".
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Thu, 17 Dec 1992 09:53:04 EST
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "Frank S. Mannino" <FRANK@SJUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Lab Receive Buffers Full
              10 Dec 1992 23:06:00 EST from <Fund@RELAY.PROTEON.COM>

On Thu, 10 Dec 1992 23:06:00 EST <Fund@RELAY.PROTEON.COM> said:
>From: Terry Guswell <P08415@PRIME-A.PLYMOUTH.AC.UK>
>X-To:         chest-novell@MAILBASE.ac.uk
>SMTP-CCMail translator Ver: acm 2.70 10/30/92
>I have a 386 Filserver running Novell 3.11 I am getting an error message
>"Lan Receive Buffer Limit Reached . All buffers are in Use".
>
>It all suggests that the posible cause is disk channel bottleneck or
>buffers have been lost.
>
>If I increase the buffers form 100 to 400 they slowly but surely get eaten up.
>The fileserver will still communicate with a workstation.
>If I disconnect from the network and load the i/f card with a t-piece and 50
>ohm loads the error still occurs.
>
>Anyone seen this before?
>Apart from changing the i/f card, any suggestions or advice.
>
>Thanks in anticipation.
>
>Adrian HOlmes
>
>   I always significantly bump up our Packet Receive Buffers.
>
>   On our SystemPros I set:
>
>   In the STARTUP.NCF -
>   SET MINIMUM PACKET RECEIVE BUFFERS=1000
>
>   In the AUTOEXEC.NCF
>   SET MAXIMUM PAKCET RECEIVE BUFFERS=1500
>
>   If I did not bump these values up, I would get messages like you got
>   when I was lucky, and server abends when I was not.
>
>   If you are not running real tight on memory, try boosting these
>   values up as I have done.
>
If the above does not work what we did at St. Johns with the problem
was Add more memory to the server to help reduce the need for disk I/O's.
Do this if you already have one buffer per workstation, and the server is slow
in responding to I/O requests.

  _________________________________________________________________
 _|__________________________________________________________
_||____________________________________________________
|||
||| Frank S. Mannino                Technical Support Specialist
||| St. Johns University            Voice : (718)-990-6594
||  EMail FRANK@SJUVM.STJOHNS.EDU
|
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell
Date:         Wed, 16 Dec 1992 21:07:47 -0800
Reply-To:     Novell LAN Interest Group <NOVELL@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         Henry Unger <hunger@HITECH.COM>
Subject:      Xircom Packet Driver?
              16 Dec 1992 12:32:00 EST <9212161752.AA08824@hitech.com>

We use Xircom Ethernet adapters with ODI drivers and Dan Lanciani's
ODIPKT shim.  I never could get Xircom's ODIPKT shim to work!
I have also used Xircom's native PE2PD driver and it works if all
you need is a packet driver.

Henry