From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
Subject: Re: Chaney's sig
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 21:59:28 GMT

In article <SCOTTS.92Sep9230035@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU> scotts@CS.CMU.EDU (Scott Safier) writes:
#In article <BuAoD7.FM4.2@cs.cmu.edu> garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
#
#   In article <SCOTTS.92Sep8173613@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU> scotts@CS.CMU.EDU (Scott Safier) writes:
#   #In any article (Stephen A Total Idiot Chaney) writes:
#   #
#   #A 25 line sig!?!
#
#   Maybe he's decided that .sig size, rather than killfile size, determines
#   manhood.  (And he's obviously very concerned about his manhood, or
#   as he says, "manlihood".)
#
#Oh, well Steve's my honey (remember all those sweet love e-letters he
#sent me).   I only go for men with a lot of "manlihood".

He certainly did pursue you like a love-sick puppy, didn't he?

#   Chaney seems not to recognize that the anti-Semitism he displays
#   contradicts his claims in the next part of his .sig.  Of course,
#   he doesn't seem to realize that his repeated references to "feminazis"
#   and bra burning contradict his "feminist" self-description.
#
#Oh, ya.  I almost forgot about his anti-Semitism.  When it comes to
#Chaney, I get stuck on his lack of coherence and inability to engage
#in a rationale discussion.  With everything that is going on,
#sometimes its hard to pick out all his faults.

At least he's willing to remind everyone of all of his shortcomings
on a regular basis.  Anyone else would let us forget some of them,
but Shaney/Hall keeps reminding us.

#   [I asked who does he think he's kidding when he implies he's
#    against disparate treatment of gays, lesbians and bisexuals].
#   The same people he thinks he's kidding with the rest of his rants.
#   (I wish you'd saved that e-mail.)
#
#The e-mail started when Chaney objected to my position in NARAL (local
#steering committee, big fucking deal.  I get to have dessert with
#Arlen Specter (that scum sucking pig).)  He ranted about how he was
#Kate Michelman's worst nightmare and how he personally was going to
#destroy the pro-choice movement with his flawlessly logical arguments.
#He kept talking about how he was going to win and score all these
#points -- I thought he got abortion confused with a basketball game.

Oh, yeah, he was going to be the anti-abortion leader by now,
wasn't he?  Maybe he'll make a newer, longer .sig in which he
describes himself as ruler of his movement.

#I *can* always dig up the mail messages.  Carnegie Mellon is not some
#half-baked teacher's college (like CSUS).  It's real hard to
#permanently loose something on our systems.

Oh, please do.  They were even funiier than some of his latest
rants.  I'd be willing to pay.

#   [Chaney on civil rights]
#   He doesn't seem to know what civil rights are.  
#
#Chaney has a lot of problems with many concepts.  Fetus/baby,
#liberty/slavery, sectarian/secular,...

Don't forget right/wrong.

#   Maybe his mommy and daddy should buy him more picture books on
#   the subject.  
#
#I don't think they'd do it.  Would you admit it if he was your child?

Sure I would.  I'd even go visit him in the home.  

Susan


Newsgroups: talk.abortion