From: jtinkle@sparc1.sparc1.csubak.edu (j. tinkle )
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.environment
Subject: Re: You have to question that the media is/isn't
Date: 17 Nov 92 20:54:47 GMT
Organization: California State University, Bakersfield

In article <9NOV199200031401@pearl.tufts.edu> ddeocamp@pearl.tufts.edu (DANIEL 
M. DEOCAMPO) writes:
>In article <1992Nov8.161303.3098@nic.csu.net>, jtinkle@sparc1.sparc1.csubak.ed
u (j. tinkle ) writes...
>
>>Ok, maybe I will leave this in.  Well, then, my response is insulting to them
.
>>And I am a scientist!  But I don't believe in evolution.
>I'm just curious - what do you study and how do reconcile Creationsim with 
>that study?
Computer Science.  Don't see how I have to, but you think of something, let
me know.

>>>	How is the Sierra Club "extreme"?
>>Being from California, I should know.  Some of their leaders are environ-
>>mentalist extremist tree-huggers.
	    ^^^^^^^^^
>That doesn't answer the question.  
Read again.
>They are one of the most centrist
>environmental groups.  Any more conservative and you start talking about
>wise-users.
What's a wise-user? 

>>Ok, but you think they AREN'T?  
>If they weren't, why did they bash Duke's head in the last time around?
I don't remember them bashing him at all.  Especially not near as much as
they did Bush this time around.  All I remember is some people, not the media,
saying how stupid he looked in the tank.

>>Then why is it that we never heard anything
>>good about Reagan/Bush economics in this election,
>Largely because it flopped in the medium term.  This says nothing about
>liberalism or conservatism.  They merely reported the recession/depression
>we're in.
Take out the apostrophe.  It's WERE in.
We're not in a recession!  Well, California sort of still is, but much of
it is due to our governer.  We can't be in a recession!  If we were the media
would tell us, and according to them now, things are rosy.

>>Clinton/Bore was how they were going to save America by taxing the rich?
>How do you think Bush got elected?  I think this time around the media did a
Bush didn't get elected by promising to tax the rich!  Where did you cook up
that idea?
>better job.  They harshed Clinto/Gore just as much as Bush (see tax & spend
>liberal, draft, pot, Hillary, Mr. Ozone, etc...).
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.  The media did NOT pick on Bill & Hillary NEAR as much
as they did Bush/Quayle.  Look up past issues of your favorite newspaper
if you don't remember how much Bush-bashing there was.  Do a %age count of
Bush- to Clinton-bashing the articles over the last 5 months.

>I guess Bushy didn't have the big MO. Thank God! :')
Huh?

>Daniel Deocampo                          Undergrad (I have an excuse for    
>ddeocamp@pearl.tufts.edu                            any silly comments.)
>                                         Department of Geology
>---------------------|                   Environmental Studies Program
>"Be gneiss to me,    |                   Tufts University
> I'm going through   |
> a lot of schist."   |
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Jennifer, proud originator of the "President Clinton" thread on alt.rush-l.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Forget Rush and the Comedy Channel!  What's DOONESBURY (Trudeau) going to do?
I'd prefer he go on the lecture circuit, instead of more stupid cartoons
about that quintabizillionaire that lives on an island with his plain assist-
ant.  Wouldn't it figure I'd have to join alt.poltics.flame.flame.flame. to
spawn my first thread?
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh