HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: I AM *NOT* AN AI (or a turing test)
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 19:03:15 GMT

In article <1992Aug26.110328.5850@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> allisson@turing.toronto.edu (H. Allisson Roome) writes:
>I am *NOT* an AI program gone rampant or an example of the turing test
>for intelligence or even someone else posting as me. 

I have to concur--having had Allisson over for a week and a half and
having performed several experiments on her far more rigorous than
the Turing test (indeed, I doubt any AI program could come close to
simulating her actions in the kitchen or the hot tub), I believe that
I can safely conclude without a trace of doubt in my mind that Allisson
is not an AI program.

Trygve   (Though jyst in case, maybe I ought to repeat a few of those
          experiments.)
From: schock@cpsc.UCalgary.ca (schock)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Rockies (was: Las Vegas)
Date: 27 Aug 92 17:09:45 GMT
Organization: The University of Calgary

In article <Pyg6PB1w165w@wildrose.infoserv.com> rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink) writes:
>   schock@flip.cpsc.ucalgary.ca (Craig-Richard Schock) writes:
>   >In article <1992Aug25.212538.27393@zooid.guild.org> Ross Ridge  
>   ><ross@zooid.guild.org> writes:
>   >> Bah, I'd take Northern Ontario (or even any place north of Barrie), over
>   >> the Rockies.  I've never understood the appeal of mountains like that,
>   >> they're so dead and lifeless.
>   >
>   >Which Rockies did you go to cause the ones I live by are wonderful! :-)
>
>   Craig! Pipe down!! Put a cork in it, man!
>
>   <ahem>

>   Yes, Ross, you are exactly right.  Dead and lifeless.  Colder than the
>   hubs of hell, and that's just our summer weather.  There's no culture
>   here either, we don't even have Oley and Tina jokes like those great
>   folks in Minnesota.  No single women, just stodgy married folks,
>   single men, and scared sheep.  (And you were wondering what this thread
>   had to do with soc.singles....) There's no appeal here whatsoever.

>   (Touron season is almost over, I can hardly wait.)

>   -- Ray

Ummmm, er... ahh... Yeah...  That's right!  Ummm... er... Listen to 
Ray cause he knows what he is talking about.  There's nothing... zilch...
nada...  the ol Zippo.  There's not enough life to shake a stick at...
hell... you can't even shake a stick cause there aren't any!  only rocks.
Big rocks...  mountain size rocks... yeah... that's it.  And some of
those rocks have snow on 'em...  lotsa snow on them.... Gee... makes
me shiver just thinking about it...

Craig

PSST.  Ray. How did I do?  Was that ok?
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Mea Non Culpa
Keywords: everybody happy
Date: 2 Sep 92 22:20:38 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

enigma@halcyon.com (Matt Luders) writes:
stef@apple.com (Stef Jones) writes:

>>Gee, thanks! I'm glad you appreciate my posts.
>You're welcome, but as I told Dan, I wasn't *really* trying to flatter you.

Nor did I feel flattered. I felt that my posts were appreciated.

>Perhaps soc.singles needs a FAQ to explain the "soc.single meaning" of words
>like "boink" and "suckup"--words that have *very* different meanings to the
>outside world.  Or would this remove all challenge?  :-)

Eek! But whom would we nominate to write the FAQ? 

>Had I *really* been trying to suck up to you, Stef, I would have posted
>something like this:
> "Was this the face that launched a thousand ships,
>  and burnt the topless towers of Ilium?
>  Sweet Stefanie, make me immortal with a kiss.
>  Her lips suck forth my soul; see where it flies!"
>     -- with apologies to Christopher Marlowe (1604)

**puzzlement** Like I said, it's getting more and more difficult to tell 
apart suckups and insults around here. It sounds as if you are calling me a
vampiric volcano. :-)

>P.S. I liked your Galileo quote*  Here's another:

>    "Facts which at first seem improbable will,
>     even on scant explanation, drop the cloak which has hidden them
>     and stand forth in naked and simple beauty."

**suspicion** dropping cloaks? nakedness??? is that a quote or a come-on?
I'm getting so confused. Should I hand you an encyclopedia or take off my 
clothes?  :-)

--
Stef                 To let understanding stop at what can be understood is a 
stef@apple.com       high attainment. Those who cannot do it will be destroyed 
                     on the lathe of heaven.           Chuang Tse XXIII
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max)
Subject: Re: Lurkers...
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 21:14:08 GMT

In article <1992Aug26.201719.2129@CERIS.Purdue.EDU> dheisler@CERIS.Purdue.EDU (Dave Heisler) writes:
>From article <1992Aug26.192500.21837@cs.hw.ac.uk>, by neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite):
>> 
>> Though one things that put off some lurkers I guess, many of the regulars
>> or soc.singles 'old timers' (for want of a better word) seem to have their
>> cliques and are always having their little digs back and forth and I guess
>> people feel a little left out.
>> 
>  
>      i'll agree this is one reason. and I'll give you
>      another,
>
>      you email someone who posts and they never reply.
>      (yes, assuming it it got there) 
>
>      CLIQUE, BANG!, GOTHCHA
>

And just why do you expect to get an answer from someone who doesn't know
you from Adam? Just because someone posts does not mean that you have an
open invitation to send them unsolicited email. I regularly delete email
from people who's name I don't recognize. If someone wants my attention
they are best off posting something interesting. 

I believe that if someone is interested in increasing their volume of email
they usually say so in their sig or something, if they don't advertise this
then you take your chances and are pretty silly if you take offense if
someone doesn't answer you.

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: morton@rtpnet06.rtp.dg.com (John R. Morton)
Subject: Re: Commitment--The C-word?
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 10:51:28 GMT
Organization: Data General Corporation, RTP, NC.

If you read alt.sex for any lenghth of time, you will no doubt notice
that the subject matter is very 'broad!' It ranges from A to Z .
One could assume from this that general sexuality is embedded in every topic,
or that sex is attractive as a label but not as a topic....


Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams)
Subject: Re: hi you all!!!
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 11:16:25 GMT

In <1992Aug31.231850.3836@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:

>In article <1992Aug31.165448.22495@news.acns.nwu.edu> drmax@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marianna Max) writes:
>>In article <1992Aug31.164417.4271@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> smaus@nyx.cs.du.edu (Scott Maus) writes:
>>
>>> Would love to hear from all you
>>>lonely ladies out there!! My interests include movies, reading, spending
>>>time together with that special person, and meeting and making new
>>>friends!!
>>
>>Isn't this just too special, *Yawn*
>>
>>Hey Trygve, isn't this guy in your neighborhood. Maybe you could take pity
>>on him and give him something more interesting to talk about.

>Why, sure--what sorts of new topics of conversation should I help him with?
>Stereo equipment?  Weightlifting?  Interesting, recent scars?
	
	Hmmm....I'm not sure that the latter is such a good idea for you.
If you have seen Lethal Weapon 3, then you will know that the discussion
of scars can lead to...um...interesting situations....
Then again, maybe you would enjoy it?:>
 
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: wtr@mitre.org (Bill Ralston)
Subject: Re: Bill Ralston
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 16:46:20 GMT

in article <71609@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:

>Hey, Bill, *we're coming to get you*...
>
>PS. Welcome to soc.singles. Anyone who can suck-up as well as you can 
should
>fit right in.

You got me.  I wasn't going to post a reply thinking that posting a 
response with my own name as the subject line was just a little too 
egotistical and all... but what the hey, it seems appropriate.

P.S. Now I know why American Airlines serves only *green* (and I mean 
green) bananas for breakfast.  All ripe bananas in the country have been 
snarfed up by boinkers!

---------------
wtr@mitre.org
** Opinions are mine only, and not my employer's **
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Where the best posts come from: Dawn naturally.
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 18:48:13 GMT

In article <la4pdaINNl25@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
>In article <-xhn_lp.barry@netcom.com> barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
>>Sheba's the best poster in the newsgroup (though she doesn't post
>>enough).
>
>Isn't anybody going to mention any men?  How about the sensitive james
>dutton?  Or Steve Swann?  Or James Nicole?  Or.... whoops, I guess it's 
>a waste of time to suck up to the men, huh?
>
>Dawn
 
I could see your impish mind working, on this one. You pixie you.
You'll always be first in my heart, also.
Whats my score?

 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
From: swann@acsu.buffalo.edu (Stephen Swann)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Can we can the suck-up bit?
Keywords: encourage friendship?
Date: 1 Sep 92 02:49:42 GMT
Organization: UB

In article <1992Aug31.183938.25374@cbnewsd.cb.att.com> nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>
>I'd like to offer a hearty suggetion that we shitcan this "suck-up" noise.
>What, if someone who happens to be male compliments the posts of someone
>who happens to be female, this is sucking up?

Only if it's done right.  Hey, you think it's easy?  And you know, if
it wasn't for the terrific women on this newsgroup, it just wouldn't
be worth it.


-- 
Steve Swann                 |    Speak to me in many voices; make
swann@acsu.buffalo.edu      |      them all sound like one...  -BOC
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Where the best posts come from: little 'e' naturally.
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 13:12:07 GMT

In article <BtvqM9.2v8@iat.holonet.net> cocoa@iat.holonet.net (little 'e') writes:
>> 
>>I could see your impish mind working, on this one. You pixie you.
>>You'll always be first in my heart, also.
>>Whats my score?
>
>Score: 100.  You have hit the bullseye and pierced my widdle heart.
>
>My poor little decieved and broken heart will now climb into a little hole
>and die. :( 
>
>"Oh Ah-go-nee!  Ah-go-nee!" - B. Bunny
>
>Just me,
>
>little "small and sensitive" 'e'

 Is that to say you've cast off that masher/johnny come lately.
 
 At this point in the flirting game it's always nice to enjoy
an ice cold Old Style. Yea the taste that refreshes. Cold. Bubbly.
Really hits the spot.
 
You don't mind if I unplug the phone do you?
 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams)
Subject: Re: Cooking for 1!
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 10:51:58 GMT

In <1992Sep3.181332.336@odin.corp.sgi.com> lana@magenta.corp.sgi.com (Lana Mountford) writes:

>In article <ewillims.715512518@unix1.tcd.ie>, ewillims@unix1.tcd.ie (Emma Williams) writes:
>|> 	But one of the best things about cooking (if you really enjoy it)
>|> is that it relaxes you, especially after a long day at work. Just pottering
>|> about the kitchen with a chilled glass of white wine in your hand and the
>|> smell of sizzling onions and garlic followed by sundried tomatoes, kalamata
>|> black olive paste, fresh basil, oregano, parsley and other special 
>|> ingredients to make up a pasta sauce, makes you feel warm, happy and
>|> relaxed.  Of course, a non-platonic massage can do wonders too but you
>|> might not always have the *ingredients* to hand! :>

>LOL!!  I posted almost this same response to Bill in another message!  (well,
>except for the massage part ;-))  I think one of the main reasons I enjoy
>cooking so much is that I *DO* find it relaxing.  

	(*GRIN*)  But I posted it first!:>
Evidently, great minds think alike, Lana!:)

Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Oh, no! Statistics! Run!! :-)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 19:27:21 GMT
Reply-To: margoli@watson.ibm.com
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: The Village Waterbed

In  <1992Aug25.004519.16716@nuchat.sccsi.com>  kevin@nuchat.sccsi.com (Kevin Brown) writes:
>
> >It's not the car. It's not the driver. It's the tools.
>
> Hmm...wonder if women go for guys with Sears Craftsman tools.  :-)

No, women like men with Snap-On tools.  :-)

Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
From: aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Bananas
Date: 26 Aug 92 18:17:27 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez

In article <1992Aug26.111713.6554@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> allisson@turing.toronto.edu (H. Allisson Roome) writes:
>
>Allisson  (Trust me, I was a Girl Scout and a Brownie)-- 

A chocolate Brownie?
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

So much Astroglide.  So little time.
From: diana@wetware.com (CatWoman )
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: DEFORMITIES AND PERVE
Date: 2 Sep 92 18:03:17 GMT
Organization: Castle WetWare MouseCatcher

dbj@cs.washington.edu (Dave Johnson) writes:

] diana@wetware.com (CatWoman ) writes:
] >
] >Tall, long hair, slender,
] >moustache, deep eyes.  Any of these characteristics will
] >get my attention - the more there are, the more attention
] >I will give the guy.
] 
] So a guy with three mustaches and eight deep eyes would
] have you all over him?

Hmmm - PicassoMan?  

Diana
From: rkf@wildrose.infoserv.com (Ray Fink)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Las Vegas
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 23:09:18 MDT
Distribution: na
Organization: Wild Rose Refugee Camp

cfg@cray.com (Cindy Glass) writes:
>kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>>cfg@cray.com (Cindy Glass) writes:
>>>I don't consider Tahoe "the woods".  I consider Northern Michigan, Northern
>>>Wisconsin, Northern Minnesota,  Northern Georgia, somewhere into the reaches 
>>>of Ontario or Manitoba - "the woods".  Where people only 'usually' go in the 
>>
>>How bout northern Washington, Montana, somewhere with mountains?
>
>I haven't been to these places yet - I've flown over the Rockies - I'll
>let you know when I get back from Colorado next week.  
>
>"The woods" is what I know - what I grew up with - where I've been comfortable.

I spent two teenage summers in the woods of northern Wisconsin, and
thought it was heaven.  But after 15 years in the Rockies, I've
realized that what was missing from back there was *mountains*.  (Some
day I'm going back to visit, but I'm a bit worried about finding that
country might have paled a bit compared to my idyllic memories).

BTW, has anybody else been surprised at how many s.s folks are
acquainted with the magic of the northwoods country?  It's not like
Houghton is a major metropolitan area....

-- Ray
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: gadfly@cbnewsi.cb.att.com (Gadfly)
Subject: Re: Boston Baby Boink!
Organization: AT&T
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 21:07:32 GMT
Summary: Bad timing.
Keywords: Paaahty, Baaahston, Wicked Pissah!

In article <3770@cvbnetPrime.COM>, bmeyer@feds12.prime.com
(Robert A Meyer x2557 14-13) writes:
>     You've heard all the rumors...
>     You've read all the hype...
>     Now it's here... 
> 
>     The Boston Baby Boink  
>     the weekend of Sept 12-13 1992
>     In Boston ... Massachussetts!

I suppose you might as well go ahead with it--strictly for
practice, you understand.  The best scheduling for the real (tm)
enchilada would be *Nov 14-15* to correspond with the US premiere
on the 12th of the movie about Marin Marais "Tous Les Matins du Monde",
starring Gerrard Depardieu as Marais.  He actually learned how to
play the viola da gamba for this flick, although the music was dubbed
in by the incomparable Jordi Savall--who will appear in concert on the
13th.  Anyway, all those red-hot early music party animals you've heard
so much about and dreamed someday to meet will be in town for that.

               *** ***
Ken Perlow   ***** *****
27 Aug 92   ****** ******   10 Fructidor An CC
            *****   *****   gadfly@ihlpa.ATT.COM
             ** ** ** **
...L'AUDACE!   *** ***   TOUJOURS DE L'AUDACE!  ENCORE DE L'AUDACE!
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
Subject: Re: SOC.SINGLES
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 15:44:52 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1992Aug30.143744.12652@cbnewsc.cb.att.com> chapin@cbnewsc.cb.att.com ( Tom Chapin ) writes:
>Stef Jones writes:
>>I think the newsgroup you want is alt.bottom-feeders.
>Sounds delightfully kinky.  Where might that newsgroup be found?

Delightfully kinky? Hell, you're here already...:)
r.
From: taina@cs.Helsinki.FI (Juha Taina)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Lurkers...
Date: 27 Aug 92 05:58:07 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki, Finland

In <1992Aug26.201719.2129@CERIS.Purdue.EDU> dheisler@CERIS.Purdue.EDU (Dave Heisler) writes:

>From article <1992Aug26.192500.21837@cs.hw.ac.uk>, by neilp@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Postlethwaite):
>> 
>> Though one things that put off some lurkers I guess, many of the regulars
>> or soc.singles 'old timers' (for want of a better word) seem to have their
>> cliques and are always having their little digs back and forth and I guess
>> people feel a little left out.

That's true in any newsgroup.  I first unlurked in alt.romance.chat
[Is he out of his little mind?? Perhaps. :)] and after the warm
welcome they gave me I was pretty much ignored there.  And I was one
of the first persons there.  On the other hand, the first time I saw
this newsgroup was about 1.5 years ago and even in that time I've seen
many active people come and go.

When I'm sending something here, I usually think that I have something
to say about the subject.  If nobody says anything I think that they
all agree with me. :)  So far nobody has said that I should leave and
the only person that has mildly flamed me was Mr. Jarvenkyla who
disagreed my opinion about Finnish women.

>      i'll agree this is one reason. and I'll give you
>      another,

>      you email someone who posts and they never reply.
>      (yes, assuming it it got there)

That's not my experience at all.  Perhaps you have emailed to people
who are really busy or who don't reply emails from strangers or your
emails were self explanatory that they didn't have to answer.  I
emailed to three people here before I started writing myself.  They
all replied.

Juha
-- 
Juha Taina | taina@cs.helsinki.fi | Phone: +358-0-708-4247
From: pw@panix.com (Paul Wallich)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Working at a Relationship
Date: 4 Sep 92 00:30:25 GMT
Organization: Trivializers R Us

In article <1992Sep3.193642.9175@gvl.unisys.com> liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious) writes:
>
>This brings up a question of mine.  What does it mean to people when they
>talk about working very hard on a relationship?  Where do you draw the line
>at what is too hard?  Lately I've started looking at it as the same kind of
>"work" that individuals will do for their own growth such as being really
>honest with themselves and accepting the reality of the "good" and "bad"
>things that are happening and being willing to change or grow from the
>experience.  I think issues come up in relationships which require the same
>kind of honesty and that it can be a great place for this kind of "work"
>and for people to grow as a couple and individuals.  Is this the way most 
>people think of the work that's involved?  Saying "very hard" to me brings up
>feelings or thoughts of never ending drudgery.

It's difficult, but it's not drudgery. That is, if you're doing it
right it isn't. If it seems like drudgery, you're probably tackling
the wrong things. The work on relationships is more like a high-wire
act -- difficult, requiring intense concentration, occasionally panic
inducing, sometimes painful, also often exhilarating.

I remember, for example, learning to have arguments with my (now ex,
but that's another story, which some of you have heard and the rest
needn't bother) babe: the idea that one could fight without killing
the other person or else cutting them off completely was completely
new to me at the time, and learning it was an amazing experience, not
to mention inordinately conducive to survival...

paul    just call me pollyanna
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: aahz@netcom.com (Aahzmandius)
Subject: Re: men in their thirties who never dated
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 14:51:19 GMT
Organization: Bill 'n' Opus for Prez
Distribution: usa

In article <kiran.715077327@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> kiran@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Kiran Wagle) writes:
>Someone unattributed at oregon.uoregon.edu writes:
>>>>Didn't know that one needed a dark side to date. 
>
>buick@belay (Patrick D. Buick) writes:
>>Hmm... this *must* be a requirement... us Nice Guys (tm) just don't
>>seem exciting enough or something... :-)
>
>Well you could always cultivate a dark side.  I'm working on it. 

Then there's always the dork side.
-- 
                         --- Aahz (the *other* Dan Bernstein)
                             @netcom.com 

Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

So much Astroglide.  So little time.
From: liz@prc.unisys.com (Liz Loquacious)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Seesters, I want the seesters.
Date: 28 Aug 92 18:47:24 GMT
Followup-To: soc.singles
Distribution: na
Organization: Paramax Systems

In article <1992Aug28.153810.6931@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
|> 
|> While I do have a tattoo, it was from the navy and not motorcycles.

And where is this tatoo?  Can just anybody see it? 

|> Harley riders hate crotch rocket riders and vica versa. I actually

Yes, you're telling the truth.  They'd love to take your bike I'd bet and
string it up on a tree and take their aggressions out on it.  They really 
have done this or so one of my sisters told me.  I don't socialize 
with 'em. :-)  All this and if you met her husband (yeah, one of them's 
married anyway; sorry to disappoint the masses) you'd probably describe him 
as polite and even meek.

|> prefer petite women(notice the plural). AND while my class may be
|> debateable my women's/woman/girlie/girl/buxom/great legs/tush/feline
|> is/are/will be above reproach.
|> and Now I will sulk over liz's denigrating description. I'm taking
|> my humour and going home.

Oh that sensitive side of you is so irresistible James.  I think 
I might swoon.  You'd catch me so I wouldn't fall, wouldn't you???

|> I don't want your sisters.
|> Hi Liz.
|> What be shakin.

Probably your knees.  Most everything on this end is fairly taut. :-)
Why your knees?  Well, it seems you're intimidated by tall women; guess
we'll just be friends then.  Sorry dearie.


Liz Loquacious
From: ANNE@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Ring for sale (The ballad of a Guy & Girl)
Date: 4 Sep 92 21:41:28 GMT
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

In article <4149@moscom.UUCP>, wjb@moscom.UUCP (Bill de Beaubien) says:
>You could probably trade Broward for his baseball bat, wherever he wandered
>off to...
>
>Ever notice how occasionally people just vanish?  Spooky...

Broward too???!!!  I'm shocked!  NOw that I'm barely out of recovery following
my deep withdrawal from Dan Mocsny's departure, I'm hit with this.

Medic!!

(Dutton, you'd better not be leaving too.  I just may have to shoot myself.)

LAK
Newsgroups: soc.singles