HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: htr@world.std.com (Helena T Robinson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: You Bet Your Life
Summary: about George Fenneman today
Date: 11 Oct 92 22:05:28 GMT
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA

In article <2897@perl-sun.dwrsun4.UUCP> perl@dwrsun4.UUCP (Robert Perlberg) writes (in part):
>The announcer on the original show was George Fenneman (sp?).  I have
>never had any reason to doubt that that was his real name.  Groucho
>often called him "Fenneman".  

Just wanted to point out that Fenneman is still alive and active - or at least 
his voice is.  He does voice-overs for commercials, notably a major savings 
bank (I think it's called the Home Bank for Savings, but don't quote me just 
now) based on the West Coast.  Reason this comes up is because the bank took 
over New York's Bowery Savings Bank a few months ago, who's long-time 
spokeperson was Joe DiMaggio.  As a matter of fact, the commercial where Bowery 
announces the change featured DiMaggio starting and Fenneman finishing.

Helena Robinson
htr@world.std.com
Xref: sparky rec.arts.tv:20059 soc.rights.human:3913 soc.culture.usa:7813 alt.rodney.king:948
From: mpython@goldman.gnu.ai.mit.edu (I am Not a Number, I am a MOOSE! )
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,soc.rights.human,soc.culture.usa,alt.rodney.king
Subject: Re: Race traitors
Keywords: [SC], Smiley Captioned for the Humor Impaired
Date: 16 Oct 92 06:45:14 GMT
Followup-To: rec.arts.tv
Distribution: na
Organization: Worcester Discordian Society, Cabal of the Unemployed
In-reply-to: sf2k+@andrew.cmu.edu's message of 11 Oct 92 21:11:11 GMT

>>>>> On 11 Oct 92 21:11:11 GMT, sf2k+@andrew.cmu.edu (Sean Patrick Friel) said:
sf2k> Whomever expresses sympathy for that drunken speed racer should be taken
sf2k> to the crematoriums.  Too bad Bergen-Belsen doesnt exist anymore.  Any
sf2k> member of the Aryan race who displays such emotions needs to be
sf2k> liquidated before the master race is infiltrated by white-trash.  If the
sf2k> SS were still in power, there would not have been any need for a
sf2k> ridiculous trial.  The negroid would have been shot.

Yow! Lay OFF the DECAF!!! Those chemicals drain your nautral body
fluids.

Either that, or, Don't Leave Yourself Logged In...

/* sorry.. I can't believe anyone this BoneHeaded exists */
/* wait... I think I can..*/

[SC] :) (: :) (: :) (: :) (: :) (: :) (: :) (: :) (: :) (: :) (: :) (:
[Smiley Captioned for the Humor Impaired]
--
     And now...Marcel Marceau will mime 		   ************
 A man being struck about the head by a 16 ton weight     *    1 6     *
If the telephone rings today, water it	  -><-		 *   T O N S    *
 I-net: MPYTHON@gnu.ai.mit.edu |there is NO rule #6	******************
Common sense is what tells you that the earth is flat...
From: preetham@chisti.umiacs.umd.edu (Preetham Gopalaswamy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Sinead on SNL...YAY SINEAD!
Date: 9 Oct 92 15:07:25 GMT

In article <BvtKz9.MLH@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, locker@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jon Locker)
writes:
|> In article <ed.718478244@cwis> ed@cwis.unomaha.edu (Ed Stastny) writes: 
|> >
|> >It depends on the person, the way he/she expressed it, etc.  No matter,
|> >though, hateful words are still an opinion valid as any.  You can call
|> >anything with conviction "hateful"...because it "strongly dislikes" the
|> >other side.  Republicans are hateful of Democrats if you go by your
|> >definition....but they go at it everyday in every way.
|> 
|> This isn't even close to being a valid point.  The way I look at it,
|> Sinead's statement that Catholicism/Christianity is "evil" is equivalent to
|> Minister Farrakhan's statement that "Jews are responsible for the majority
|> of wickedness on this planet" (not an exact quote, but close)  Each of
|> these statements is a far cry from "The Democrats are big spenders" or "The
|> Republicans are responsible for the debt"

Actually, there is a big difference between what Farrakhan said and what Sinead
did.   Farrakhan was expressing an opinion on people simply because of their
religion, Sinead was criticizing the religion itself.   There is no evidence to
show that she would simply hate a person just because they are Catholic.  Now THAT
would be Farrakhan-like.   So you are not being fair in your comparison.   When
she tore up the Pope's picture, she was not making a personal statement against
the Pope but using him as a symbol of a religion that is causing a lot of problems
in her country.

|> >Perhaps I'm being extremely presumptuous, but I think if Sinead would
|> >have made a statement (or alluded toward a statement) that you agreed
|> >with, you'd have no trouble with it.
|> 
|> Huh?  Sorry, but I'll never agree to a statement expressing hate toward a
|> group because of religion.

So, does this mean that you think that it is alright to hate a group for a reason
other than religion ?   Cause then you ARE kind of attesting to Ed's statement.
You do not think that religion is a good enough reason a group and hence Sinead
is wrong.  Of course I am extrapolating a little based on what you said, I could
be wrong in my assessment.

|> You read too much into my post. What I said was that her words we
|> What's the difference between Ms. O'Connor's statement and Mr. Farrakhan's?
|> I just think that these days, hateful attacks on some groups are PC while
|> others aren't.
|> 

No, hateful attacks on anybody or any group is wrong if they are not directly
responsible for the reasons you hate them for.  THAT is not PC.   For example,
there are people who dislike homosexuals that they would physically harm them or
discriminate against them socially or professionally.   I think that such people
are asking to be hated.   However if you hold this against all people who do not
approve of a homosexual lifestyle, THAT would be wrong.


					Preetham
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: jackie8@dasher.uucp (Jackie Brady)
Subject: Re: Commercial:  Folger's Coffee
Organization: Bellcore - Piscataway, NJ
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 18:41:01 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.175148.18984@leland.Stanford.EDU> mesora@leland.Stanford.EDU (Rose Adams) writes:
>In article <ld660eINN91o@news.bbn.com> ahsiung@labs-n.bbn.com (Anita Hsiung) writes:
>>That commercial with the British woman and American male neighbour
>>(yes, I know both actors are British)..  Who is the man in her
>>apartment in the latest installment?  Neighbour comes over, the man
>>says polite, ambiguous comments to confuse him about their
>>relationship, then offers him coffee.  WHO IS HE?  And why is he
>>trying to ruin the game??  (Okay, I'm calm now.)
>>
>>	-- Anita --
>
>
>I don't know for sure, but I'd bet that he turns out to be her brother...

That's a pretty good bet.  Especially the way she said, "And I don't
suppose you told him who *you* are?"  I know these commercials irritate
a lot of people, but I like these serial commercials and I wonder what
major event the next one will premiere during.  (Superbowl???) 

---
Jackie Brady/jackie8@cc.bellcore.com/908-699-5458 (insert usual disclaimer)
(do not reply to the address in "From:" section. Use id in .sig to reply)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: rck1@ellis.uchicago.edu (roberta chi-woon kwong)
Subject: QL: "Nowhere to Run": observations
Reply-To: rck1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 16:30:30 GMT

Another great episode. *SPOILERS* and observations below:































I wound up watching this episode last night with a bunch of people,
and as often happens in such cases, there were quite a few
interruptions and missed lines (not to mention fuzzy reception,
through of course that wasn't one of the consequences :-) ; I'll
have to go back and watch it again, but I'd a couple of comments to
make...

I'm not quite sure why Sam had to deal with the the leapee and
"his" wife's situation in the first place. If, in the original
history, the leapee and his wife had three sons already, why was
Sam there to "correct" that situation? My only conclusion is that
having necessarily leaped in during those crucial first days (in
order to save the other vet's life), Sam possibly changed history
so that "his" wife *didn't* stay with him. Or had the mother been
Kiki all along? Did I miss something (possibly)?

Kiki was bright and friendly, although it sort of bothered me that
she was trying (and not very subtly) to seduce a married man. 

Al's speech about the Wall...incredible.

I wonder how the situation back in the Waiting Room was handled?
It doesn't seem possible that Al could know, just by looking in the
WR, the condition of the leapee; the leapee would have to say
something, at least, to indicate what he was feeling (surely they
didn't keep him in the room with the mirror?). It seems things have
changed so that now Al sees Sam and the leapee as themselves
(perhaps due to consequences of the simo-leap?). 

Sam's revenge against the orderly was wonderful, as was the
orderly's expression when he saw the mirror image :-)

When it was revealed that the leapee's wife left him because she
had found another man, I kept waiting for some reference to Al's
situation with Beth. Or maybe that would have opened up a whole new
can of worms...

Next episode: Talk about creepy leap-ins. But pre-empted again?!?


Robin C. Kwong ("er)
				Leapers do it with...mirrors.
From: m1tca00@fed.frb.gov (Thomas C. Allard)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Al's Last Name
Date: 7 Oct 92 14:06:37 GMT
Distribution: usa

In article <nittmo.718421424@camelot>, nittmo@camelot.bradley.edu (Christopher Taylor) writes:
> In response to the question:
>  
> Does anyone know Al's last name?
> 
> I have a few answers:
> 
> Franken?
> Alda?
> Hrabosky?
> Jones?
> Smith?
> Volkov?
> Puccini?
> 
> Hope one of these is the Al you're looking for.

Two more:
  Bundy (from MWC)
  Greenspan (my boss's boss's boss).

----
"Oh Life's a Cabaret
 Like Berlin, 1930,
 All I crave is my escape"  --Dead Kennedys, "Saturday Night Holocaust"
rgds-- TA  (uucp: uunet!fed!m1tca00 | internet: m1tca00@fed.frb.gov)
[implied disclaimer]
----
"Oh Life's a Cabaret
 Like Berlin, 1930,
 All I crave is my escape"  --Dead Kennedys, "Saturday Night Holocaust"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: GC.KHH@forsythe.stanford.edu (Kristin Holtz)
Subject: Re: QVC - Jeff/Judy
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 23:44:33 GMT

I read in one of the supermarket tabloids, yes it was The Enquirer,
that they realized that their marriage was a mistake while the were
on their honeymoon. The article went on to say that Jeff is accusing
Judy of cruel and unusual treatment and public humiliation. Who
knows if it is true. I thought that they made a cute couple.

Kristin Holtz
Stanford University
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: krk1@pyuxe.uucp (24228-knights)
Subject: QL Novel
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 17:10:06 GMT

Where are you guys finding this book?  I've been to a couple
of bookstores and not seen hide nor hair of it.  

Also, what is the exact title and what does it look like?
-----
Katriena Knights
"I don't mind being in touch with reality, as long as I don't 
have to live there."
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: goldberg@iastate.edu (Adam Goldberg)
Subject: Re: "kids in the hall"
Originator: goldberg@vincent2.iastate.edu
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 13:14:47 GMT


>>Favorite skits, anyone?  I am constantly haunted by "The Daves I Know," 
>MY favorite skit so far is the Bloody Salty Ham skit. I think I have
>most of it memorized. I love it at the very end when the wife calls to
>ask someone how to stuff a whole pig.

>jam'

ERADICATOR!!!!!!  SLOWLY I CLIMB THE D SQUASH LADDER!!!

-- 
 Adam Goldberg                  !   Ask me how IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY is  
 goldberg@iastate.edu           !   censoring my usenet access!!        
 ..!uunet!iastate.edu!goldberg  !   >>I don't need a BIG BROTHER!!<<
From: rnlee@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Profess'nal Agitator)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Reasonable Doubts repeat
Date: 14 Oct 92 17:36:58 GMT
Organization: MAWL - Mudd Alums Without Lives

They ran a repeat this week on the account of the Veepstakes.  At the
beginning of this ep, Gold appears to be wrapping up the election.
Did they have an ep that actually featured the election?  Or did they
just go from Gold runs to Gold won?

Agitator
  #->

"A political deadend."                  Bruce Herschensohn for U.S. Senate!!!
    --Gore on the Vice Presidency when    Not the ten-year       //  The REAL
      asked about a Dukakis-Gore ticket   Congress insider      //   outsider
--------------- R E M E M B E R   B E I J I N G ------------\\ //------------
IBM PC - Who wants a politically correct computer?           \X/  Only AMIGA!
========================================== Bring Back the Caltech Cannon!! ==
Roderick Lee, HMC '91      "The Professional Agitator"      agitator@ucsd.edu
From: sallylb@netcom.com (Sally Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: QL: simo-leap sp?
Date: 9 Oct 92 00:02:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: netcom.1992Oct9.000246.29568
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)

In article <1992Oct8.191906.3898@unlinfo.unl.edu> aberigan@nde.unl.edu (A. Berigan) writes:
>SPOILERS for end of Shock Theatre and ep. The Leap Back

>Why is the simultaneous leap of Sam and Al in The Leap Back referred to
>as a "simo-leap"?  Shouldn't it be "simul-leap" due to the derivation

Because it's spelled that way in the script.

Sally
-- 
Sally Smith (510)790-0608  sallylb@netcom.com (I was sally@tardis.tymnet.com)
I'm unemployed--these opinions *must* be mine!
"Don't investigate this too closely." -- Don Bellisario, re: "Quantum Leap"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: firestar@leland.Stanford.EDU (Lipton Ann Meredith)
Subject: Re: SNL Oct. 12 Review
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 21:58:09 GMT


I asked this once before, and no one responded, so I'm trying again:

WHAT DID PESCI SAY ABOUT SINEAD?

I saw Sinead's pope thing, I did not see Pesci's opening monologue, so
please email me or post or something and tell me what happened?  I'm dying
here!

Firestar
firestar@leland.stanford.edu

-- 
I don't bite, you know.    | Find me and turn thy | It is better to have loved 
Unless it's called for.    | back on heaven.      | and lost than to have your
-- Audrey Hepburn, Charade | -- R. W. Emerson     | finger caught in a blender.
*******************************************************************************
From: jaorans@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (Jeff Oransky)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Sinead O'Conner
Date: 7 Oct 92 15:32:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: pbhyg.1992Oct7.153221.28198
Reply-To: jaorans@PacBell.COM (Jeff Oransky)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA

I thought that Sinead's "political statement" was offensive, but not
nearly as offensive as her singing ability.  With her looks and talent
(or lack thereof) I don't understand her appeal.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Jeff Oransky             !   "Hope is the thing with feathers ......"      !
! 			   !         Woody Allen                             !
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: sallylb@netcom.com (Sally Smith)
Subject: Re: QL: The Novel
Summary: Sucks, IMHO
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 04:55:27 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.162717.23576@ultb.isc.rit.edu> djt2445@ritvax.isc.rit.edu writes:
>Any comments out there on the book?

Yeah, it's badly written to the point of making me want to puke, and
ignores all the basic ideas of the whole premise of the show.

Other than that it's fine.

Sally
-- 
Sally Smith (510)790-0608  sallylb@netcom.com (I was sally@tardis.tymnet.com)
I'm unemployed--these opinions *must* be mine!
"Don't investigate this too closely." -- Don Bellisario, re: "Quantum Leap"
From: margaret@cs.arizona.edu (Margaret Newman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Laurie Hill
Summary: good show!
Date: 15 Oct 92 18:55:06 GMT

In article <serLoe_00iV2020kkZ@andrew.cmu.edu>, cb30+@andrew.cmu.edu (Carol A. Buckner) writes:
> I find myself liking this show more each week.  Anyone else out there
> like this show???  Am I alone--haven't seen anything on the net???
>  
> Carol Buckner

I like this show, too.  I think her husband has a tendancy to be a jerk,
however.  He should be more supportive or realistic.  Anyway, makes for
more realism than something more mushy.  I liked the way she handled the
situation with her young patient.  She is trying to be a supermom.  "Trying"
I think is the operative word.  Last week, the house was a wreck, and then
the plumbing went.  This week she's trying to beet Robin Hood's mom in
making a costume for Leo (I loved "Leo the Lion").

My hope is that it keeps going the way that it is.  By the way, I haven't
figured out what her husband does.  Is he going to school or working or
what?  Maybe I missed something -nothing new!

margaret@cs.arizona.edu
From: jsp@uts.amdahl.com (James Preston)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Commercial: Folger's Coffee
Date: 9 Oct 92 22:58:32 GMT
Reply-To: jsp@pls.amdahl.com
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten) writes:

}I HATE this commercial.  The weirdest part is that it is the
}only commercial I've ever seen that was advertised!  Some ad about
}"coming soon, our new coffee commercials".  

Yup.  I couldn't believe it when I saw a full-page ad in TV Guide for
a commercial.  An advertisement for a commercial.  Am I the only one
who thinks there's just something totally bizarre about that?

--James Preston

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,misc.legal,alt.censorship
From: gtchen@glacier.berkeley.edu (George Chen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Highlander the series
Date: 12 Oct 1992 16:43:33 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley -- ERL
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: glacier.berkeley.edu

I caught only the last half hour of the second episode.  Can
anyone tell me the premise of the series and what happened
in the premier.  I've seen the movie already.

--
***********************************************************************
* George T. Chen       * This isn't right.  This isn't even wrong. WP *
* gtchen@speech.sri.com * I Ski, Therefore I Am - shirtprint Whistler *
***********************************************************************
From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: RD: The Interpreter!
Date: 9 Oct 1992 22:21:51 GMT
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: telecaster.think.com

In article <1410@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM> lsnow@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Linda Snow) writes:
>BTW, whatever happened to Dicky's interpreting for her?  Why does she
>need 2 different people?

Dicky isn't a professional interpreter, he's just a cop who happens to know
ASL (one (both?) of his parents was deaf), so he was assigned to be her
investigator.  At the beginning of the series he was supposedly out of
practice for a while.

The interpreter is a professional, and this is presumably required for
official use in legal processes such as the courtroom, so that his
translations can be expected to be faithful and treated as legally coming
from Tess (i.e. I don't think he would have pulled the stunt he pulled in
the judge's chambers if he had been translating in court).

Seems like a weird job.  I assume he translates exclusively for Tess, so
that she doesn't have to adjust her schedule around his conflicts.  But he
doesn't need to be around much when Dicky is available for informal work,
or when Tess is lip reading.  Does he spend most of his time sitting
outside Tess's office twiddling his thumbs and waiting for her to call him?


-- 
Barry Margolin
System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com          {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
From: glimmer@camelot.bradley.edu (Jennifer Young)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: QL is educational! :)
Date: 16 Oct 92 05:01:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: camelot.glimmer.719211660
Distribution: na
Organization: Bradley University

I observe 8th graders for teaching credit and today they had a test.  The
extra credit question was what happened on Oct.15, 1962.  The answer was
the Cuban missile crisis and my teacher was surprised that 3 people got it
right.  2 out of the three remembered the QL episode about the crisis. Just
a little gee-whiz fact. :)

 
--
The Shimmering Glimmer         Jennifer Young        glimmer@camelot.bradley.edu

Kampf Um die Leben: "To be nobody -but- yourself in a world which is doing
its best, night and day, to make you everybody else means to fight and
never stop fighting."  
                         -- e.e. cummings
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: colten@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (marc.colten)
Subject: Re: It isn't folgers...
Summary: More ways to save this commercial
Organization: AT&T
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 20:08:38 GMT

In article <1ava27INNbub@bigboote.WPI.EDU>, leela@wpi.WPI.EDU (Leela Keshavan) writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Regarding the commercial for coffee, I think its taster's choice, or
> something like that.. 
> 
> I'm pretty convinced that the man in her apartment is her brother, first
> because he does seem to be enjoying the whole situation, and two because
> she asks him if he told him who he was...
> 
> Leela
> leela@wpi.wpi.edu

As a follow up to my previous diatribe:

I also think he's her brother (possible kinkiness?  I doubt it).  But
another way they could save this commercial is have the neighbor snap,
come running back with a gun, screaming "IF I CAN'T HAVE YOU, NO ONE
CAN!"  Then we could either fade out or have him gun them down as
she yells "Wait, he's ...."

marc colten


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: firestar@leland.Stanford.EDU (Lipton Ann Meredith)
Subject: Batman: The Animated Series
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 06:09:06 GMT


I keep taping this show to catch any chance Catwoman episodes, and then I keep
forgetting to tape and missing days, so does anyone know if there have been
any Catwoman episodes besides that two-parter The Cat and the Claw?

Thanks for your help.

Firestar
-- 
I don't bite, you know.    | Find me and turn thy | It is better to have loved 
Unless it's called for.    | back on heaven.      | and lost than to have your
-- Audrey Hepburn, Charade | -- R. W. Emerson     | finger caught in a blender.
*******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: dlb@fanny.wash.inmet.com (David Barton)
Subject: Re: QL 10/6
Organization: Intermetrics Inc., Washington Division, USA
Distribution: rec
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 15:29:58 GMT

In article <21213@drutx.ATT.COM> tom@drutx.ATT.COM (MaddenTC) writes:

   Some spoilers, I guess.

Well, maybe.  I'll keep the spaces in.























   But I forgive it all just for that wonderful palm reading vignette.
   The actress playing Kiki defined her character more precisely in
   ten seconds with just her eyes than Brooke Shields was able to do
   in 40 minutes of ranting bitchiness. The tension when the thought
   "she knows" crossed my mind was delightful - that's one of the
   missing touches I referred to in my angst-filled post on LHO.  It's
   great to have "my" QL back (theme music excepted).

I must take this moment to confess my stupidity.  True confession
time, after seeing all the other comments on the "Nowhere to Run"
episode.

During the entire damn thing, I kept thinking that Kiki was a sneak,
earlier appearance of the Evil Leaper(tm).  Her apparent reference to
Sam's leaping and mission got me thinking that way, and her great
seductive ploy just as Mr. Miller was coming in also had me going.
The final scene, of her bringing in the wheelchair just as Sam is off
having dinner did it too me; I was SURE!   Then, she wasn't.  Boy, do
I feel dumb.

Of course, the promo that had a quick flash of the seduction scene
from Nowhere to Run just after the appearance of the Evil Leaper
Glowing Eyes(tm) may have prejudiced me.

All during the episode, I thought that Sally had certainly excelled at
keeping her mouth shut.  I still think Don did it just to tease.

					Dave Barton
					dlb@hudson.wash.inmet.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv