Newsgroups: bit.listserv.games-l
Date:         Thu, 27 Aug 1992 15:05:48 -0500
Reply-To:     Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster <POSTMASTER@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Comments:     <Parser> E: Mail origin cannot be determined.
Comments:     <Parser> E: Original tag was -> SENDER: <>
From:         Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster <POSTMASTER@BROWNVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Returned Mail
X-To:         GAMES-L@BROWNVM.brown.edu

Recipient Merlo_Loretta@qmcumc.mail.cornell.edu is not a valid QuickMail user.
 Try a different address.

===== Original Message Follows =====
Received: by alsys1.aecom.yu.edu id AA27124
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4/AECOM-RIT for Merlo_Loretta@qmcumc.mail.cornell.edu); Thu, 27
 Aug 1992 13:21:18 -0400
From: James Swanton <swanton@aecom.yu.edu>
Message-Id: <199208271721.AA27124@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu>
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (fwd)
To: Merlo_Loretta@qmcumc.mail.cornell.edu
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 13:21:17 EDT
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL4]

Mail Delivery Subsystem writes:
From daemon Thu Aug 27 13:06:53 1992
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 13:06:50 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON>
Message-Id: <199208271706.AA26751@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu>
To: swanton
Cc: Postmaster
Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 qmcumc.mail.edu (TCP)... 550 Host unknown
554 Merlo_Loretta@qmcumc.mail.edu... 550 Host unknown (Authoritative answer from
 name server)

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by alsys1.aecom.yu.edu id AA26745
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4/AECOM-RIT for Merlo_Loretta@qmcumc.mail.edu); Thu, 27 Aug
 1992 13:06:50 -0400
From: James Swanton <swanton@aecom.yu.edu>
Message-Id: <199208271706.AA26745@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu>
Subject: Exellent comments (fwd)
To: Merlo_Loretta@qmcumc.mail.edu
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 92 13:06:49 EDT
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL4]

Nick Thanasoulias Analytical Chemistry Dept. writes:
>From postmaster%BRFAPESP.BITNET@UICVM.UIC.EDU Thu Aug 27 01:41:24 1992
Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 02:41 BSC (-0300 C)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92  17:53:32 EET
From: Nick@GRIOANUN.bitnet (Nick Thanasoulias Analytical Chemistry Dept.)
Subject: Exellent comments
To: opera-l@BRFAPESP.BITNET
Errors-To: postmaster@BRFAPESP.BITNET
Reply-To: opera-l@BRFAPESP.bitnet
Message-Id: <9208261728314CD.AFZO@GRIOANUN> (UMass-Mailer 4.04)
X-Envelope-To: swanton@alsys1.aecom.yu.edu
X-Vms-To: opera-l@fpsp.fapesp.br
Comments: @FPSP.FAPESP.BR - @FPSP.HEPNET - @BRFAPESP.BITNET - .BR gateway

The comments on J.G.'s message were exellent indeed and I agree that opera
should not be open to those that are 'the experts' and only to them. I got
involved with opera when I was 11 and it was 'Le nozze' that made me adore
this kind of music. I remained a keen supporter of 'traditional classical'
opera for many years and it was only recently that I discovered the modern
aspects of classical music.

I might be a bit biased since I've been composing music since I was 12
(I hope that you won't get the idea of a new Mozart because my compositions
by that time were not something astonishing; not that they are now) and
I studied music for six years. I had to quit my musical studies to study
for my entrance exams; I always wanted to become a chemist and I did.
At the moment I'm a postgraduate student but this doesn't stop me from
listening and composing music. It's a poity that today students have so
many things to learn and everyday life is so demanding that most people
think that the arts have nothing to do with a man's well-being and it is
the arts that one has to quit if he finds himself in a difficult position
as far as money, studies, family etc are concerned.

I believe that music has no age. It is very much alive in any century
and people should not feel that they are 'out-of-time' by listening
to any kind of music. If you listen to music of the past be not
afraid for your preferences. You will be influenced by today's
aspects and you'll soon discover the 'best way' to fulfill your
needs. I think this what most kids do nowadays, only they are not
given the oportunities to get to know the past. Some people think
that the past is not promoting at all. I think they are wrong.
In chemistry, at least, it is the past that one has to rely on to
make science to work and produce usefull things for the future.
I suppose the same holds for any other science.

Nick Thanasoulias


--


--
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU