HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: harbison@dbsun.uucp (harbison)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Stanford 23, U$C 9 (includes marching band stuff)
Date: 10 Nov 92 23:30:26 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: BioMerieux-Vitek, St. Louis Mo.

In article <26077@optima.cs.arizona.edu>
jbs@cs.arizona.edu (John B. Slankas) writes:
> In article <aelman.721269258@Xenon.Stanford.EDU>
> aelman@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Adam Elman) writes:
> > Seriously -- why is it that the USC Band plays the same music over
> > and over again?  ...
> Its to o annoy the living hell out of the opposing team and their
> fans.  I beleive their coach even orders the band to play it as
> much as possible.

Just be grateful that you don't play Tennessee.  Their band plays
Rocky Top a zillion times each game.  A typical game goes something
like this.

UT scores ... UT band plays Rocky Top.
UT recovers fumble ... UT band plays Rocky Top.
UT makes a first down ... UT band plays Rocky Top.
UT makes a tackle ... UT band plays Rocky Top.
UT coach sneezes ... UT band plays Rocky Top.

Get the picture?  It gets on your nerves, even if you watch the game
on TV. I *hate* that damn song!

-- 
*realName: Phil Harbison
*mailName: harbison%dbsun.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu
*phoneList: 314-731-7475 (w) 314-272-9318 (h)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: crs@stein.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Subject: Re: Meeks = Corso = CORRECT!!!!!
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 23:08:39 GMT

davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks) writes:
>
> I really shouldn't do this, but I took a lot of abuse for stating my opinion
> that Arizona was going to beat Washington.  Seems like ol' Lee and I may be
> the only ones in the US that predicted it correctly.  

I will stipulate that both you and Corso called it.  I still disagree that
Corso has a brain.  Remeber, he also called Louisville over TAMU and BC
over Notre Dame this weekend.

> As to the ongoing thread of "The War is Over"... Well, the "War" is over..
> But only if you count the war as being the Miami/Washington debate.  There
> were people that went as far as saying that, since it was in Arizona, that
> Washington could even lose by a couple and they would be better.  Well, the
> lost, and they lost by more than a couple.  

The game was extremely close as you should know.  The Wildcats scored a late
touchdown to put the game out of reach, but it was clearly undecided with
four or five minutes left in the game.  Washington outgained the Wildcat
offense in total yardage as well.  Washington turnovers and the inability
to capitalize in the red zone were the difference in the game.

> Hats off to Arizona, playing one of the tougher schedules in the nation, and
> coming within 3 FGs of being undefeated and possibly #1.  Impressive showing
> against #1 Miami, wins over UCLA, Stanford, Cal, and Washington.  If they
> finish up with a win at USC, this could be one of those sad stories of...
> "Probably one of the top 3 teams in the nation, but with those 2 losses and
> 1 tie... well..."

Agreed.

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
University of Washington      *   water again!
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Patrick E Fleming)
Subject: Re: USC Arizona
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 18:15:40 GMT

Chris Stassen writes:

>Note that this is the same paper that reported Ohio State as a
>3-point favorite over *itself* a few weeks ago.  So take it with
>a grain of salt until someone else confirms it.

Actually, that was about right for the Ohio State/Illinois game.

     - Pat
-- 
- Patrick E. Fleming -------------------------------------------------------
- Department of Chemistry ---------------- It's raining, it's pouring ------
- Ohio Wesleyan University --------------- Your old man is snoring ---------
- pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu ---------------------------------------
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: KSU vs Neb was(Re: Nebraska and patsies)
Date: 5 Nov 92 16:22:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: mccall.1992Nov5.102253
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


In article <oeyGEEq00iV4814aZR@andrew.cmu.edu>, "Susan R. Wagner" <sw39+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>I wrote:
>>***Note: that KSU and NU are on the same plane to Toyko.****
>
>Oh won't that be fun!
>PS when is this game? 
> 
One bizzare rumor I heard that KSU(Snyder?) was requiring that
KSU gets the non-sunnyside of the plane: there and back, before
they would go to this game.

The game is Dec 5, 9pm CST(Dec 6 @ noon - in Japan).
--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: hpang@engin.umich.edu (Ho Sun Pang)
Subject: Re: Michigan Arranges Tune-up for Irish
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 18:02:27 EST
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor

In article <BxJ2F9.5L9@encore.com> jfrederi@encore.com (Justin Frederich) writes:
>mike@spss.com (mike cornwall) writes:
>
>>Michigan has moved its 1993 against Washington State from Sept 18 to Sept 4.
>>That means that Michigan will now have a tune-up before they meet Notre Dame
>>on Sept 11.
>
>Gee that gives them 14 days instead of 7 to figure why they didn't beat ND :-)
>

Jerk, if Michigan win that game (which is very likely) you better shave your
head and stop talking trash here.

Woofing doesn't help, man!

- Louis
From: seale@bcserv.wustl.edu (Seale (Jeff))
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Lin Elliot improving?
Date: 11 Nov 92 14:20:33 GMT
Organization: Washington University in Saint Louis, MO USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcserv.wustl.edu

dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch) writes:

>An important development for the Cowboys:  after missing his first two
>attempts against the Eagles, Lin Elliot has made seven straight field goals,
>including two which were taken back (both on penalties).  His kicks in the
>Detroit game all looked solid.  I hope he has finally gained some form and
>will continue kicking like this the rest of the season!


As someone who saw Lin Elliot kick at Texas Tech for 4 years,
He sucks. True he hasn't lost a game for the Cowboys yet, but give
him time. He lost his share for Tech in 4 years!
Still, I hope he does well. Tech doesn't have many NFL players, so
we need all the help we can get.

-Jeff (Thank God the Cowboys are good because my Seahawks suck) Seale






>Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Imran Qureshi)
Subject: Re: Bills in 1st..suprise,surprise
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 17:31:08 GMT

In <1992Nov5.150838.2321@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna) writes:

>In article <1992Nov3.183621.16095@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>, iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Imran Qureshi) writes:
>> 
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Two weeks ago, Miami was going 16-0 and to the SB while the Bills would
>> wither away and be finished once and for all.
>> 
>-----------------------------------------------------------------> 
>> AS Thurman said:  13 wins in a row.
>> 2 down, 11 to go!
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> 
>> Imran Qureshi

>I never heard Miami fans (at least on this net) predicting anything
>like 16-0.  There was optimism, but not of the ridiculous caliber.
>However, you seem to be doing the same thing you are accusing Miami
>fans of, i.e. rabid woofing indicating an undefeated season from
>here on out.

I don't accuse anyone of woofing.  That's part of the fun of football..supporting your team.  However, what I say is that your woofing (of Miami fans) does
not have a suitable qualification (as in the last two weeks).  However, the
Bills is a team which is capable of (arguably) winning 11 in a row.  After all
they have dominated the AFC the last two seasons.  The Bills DO have a a 
qualification on which they can base their woofing on.

However, woofing is fun, don't stop.......!!
Then there would be nothing to argue about and this newsgroup would be boring.


>-- 
>Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Imran Qureshi

>Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
From: un032221@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Stop putting game summaries on news group
Date: 9 Nov 92 20:28:54 GMT
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <BwuHAv.HtG@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v066pwk9@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (BRUCE YAEGER) writes:
> 
> The last thing I want to read is a game summary, they are too
> long.  That is what sports news casts are for on T.V.
> With 150 posts and responses, I have enough to read.
> 
> Bruce, a Bills fan

	Wow!  What responses.  I had no idea, that so many people read this
group that were international!!!  But, he does have a point (though a minor
one).  I can see the necessity of the posts, but how much time do you all have? 
Most of these things are a good 100-200, I even saw a 300 line summary thing!!!
This is a bit ridiculous if you ask me.  I would love to read the summaries,
but 200 lines?  gimme a break.  If nothing else, I wold like to ask that the
notes, specifically the (vanilla) ice notes be a bit shorter so that they are
readable.  I don't have all year to sit around and go through these things, and
I really want to read what EVERYONE has to say.   
	-Skins fan that thinks Ryp is overrated.
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Help: Overtime rules.
Date: 9 Nov 92 13:51:33 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <92314.092551SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu>, Spaceman Spiff <SXK129@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
> what exactly are the OT rules in the NFL? does the 1st team to score win the
> game or does each team get at least one possession of the ball (and a chance
> to score)?
> ---
> later,
> sunil

              Sudden death. The first team to score in any way wins.

                                  -doug THE dolfan-
From: newson@sequent.com (Newson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Sports Illustrated midseason All-Pro team
Date: 13 Nov 92 16:14:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: sequent.1992Nov13.161430.18104
Organization: Sequent Computer Systems Inc.

In article <1992Nov12.095624.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>>> I laugh at those fools from SI... They said that Buffalo wouldn't
>>> make the playoffs.. What fools!!!! 
>> 
>> 
>> Yeah, if Buffalo didn't make the playoffs, who could we count on to 
>> lose the Super Bowl??!!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>         I think San Fran will finnaly lose one: Miami 34   S. F. 24
>
>                             -doug THE dolfan-

			NOT!

Go 9ers
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power)
Subject: Cowboys Media Attention Week
Reply-To: patpower@crchh458.bnr.ca (Patrick Power)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Richardson, Tx
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:46:29 GMT


    The Cowboys will be featured in Sports Illustrated this week. First
time in quite awhile.  Also, they will be featured on HBO's Inside the
NFL.  

      I'm starting to believe the previous post re: flashbacks to the 70s.


Now, what did I do with those "Earth" shoes?


-- 
If I could, I'd slow the whole world down*I'd bring it to its | Pat Power
knees*I'd stop it spinnin' round*But as it is, I'm climbing   | My opinions only
up an endless wall*No time this time, No time at all          |
       - The Police, "No Time This Time"                      | Da Boyz are back!!
From: JMC162@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Bills
Date: 10 Nov 92 01:08:19 GMT
Organization: Penn State University

I have decided to cut down on my woofing, other Bills fans have made it clear t
hat we need not do this so I won't anymore.  I am simply going to point out the
 good things that happened in the Steelers game.
1)  I was very impressed with Don Beebe.  Even though he dropped a sure TD he h
ad a great day.  8 rec - 101 yds.  I'm excited because I know that he's the key
 to the big game.
2)  Kelly looked sharp.  I'd still rather have Reich in their, but I'm probably
 in the minority.
3)  Thomas was back to his old self.  I was concerned that the O line wasn't do
ing the job this season, but they came through big in the Steelers game.
4)  The D also looked better.  I'm impressed with Maddox and Patton.  Moving Be
nnet to the inside was a great idea.  Foster didn't gain 100 yds.  That was ver
y important in the win.

I am concerned however about the status of Andre Reed.  Is he healthy?  Will he
 be ready for the fish?  Knowing the type of shape that he stays in, I'd be sur
prised if he wasn't.

I'm sure that I'll get a million comments from the fish fans about how terrible
 they thought the Bills looked.  To tell you the truth, I honestly don't care.
 The Steelers game was the best that the Bills have looked all season and they
are still 7-2.  Let's remember after Monday Night that a win is a win and a los
s is a loss, no matter how the game turns out.  Go Bills!

Joe Calabrese - A Frank Reich wanna be.
From: mgriffin@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Mark Griffin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: When will the Bears give Lewis the RB job?
Date: 10 Nov 1992 11:10:20 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu

When will Ditka give in and decide that Neil Anderson is not an every
down back anymore?  Darren Lewis has been much better in the few chances
he has had.  Ditka supposedly isn't a big fan of Anderson anyway.  With the
Bears losing so much anyway, I would just make Lewis the regular back with
Muster as Fullback and just use Anderson occasionally to give Lewis a 
breather.  What does everyone or anyone else think?

-- 
.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  .
Mark Griffin, Sys Admin, Fort Hays State University      |It is always better to
Internet:mgriffin@matt.ksu.ksu.edu Bitnet:mgriffin@ksuvm |do, than be done to.
.   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .   .  .
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Looking for Dave's pool post...
Date: 13 Nov 1992 17:16:41 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

I seemed to have missed the final post of the net pool. Dave, if you're
around, could you please post it one more time?

thanks,

--salty
From: kenm@array.com (Ken Murphy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Cowboy Bandwagon
Date: 11 Nov 92 14:41:31 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Array Microsystems, Colorado Springs, CO. USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

wesloskij@kirk.msoe.edu wrote:
: 
: 	Is it just me or is everyone else sick of all these "fair-
: weather" fans jumping on the Cowboy bandwagon.  Dallas has not dominated
: the NFC east by any means and they still have a long way to go.  The way

Yea I'm pretty sick of it....  I've been a 'pokes fan for as long as I've 
been watching football.  I was a 'pokes fan when they were 1-15 and would
have been a fan had they been 0-16.  I agree that they haven't dominated 
and would actually like to see them get beaten before the playoffs.  I 
don't think they are mature enough to carry a big win streak to the playoffs.
Witness Sunday's game and Mr. Sanders with 80+ yards in the first half.
They weren't mentally ready.

: basement.  Let's face reality, they are very overrated and will choke
: come playoff time!!

... like the Eagles?

: 		Go Jim McMahon and the Eagles!!!

go Pokes.

: --John--

Merf

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pruett@b15.ingr.com (Debbie Pruett)
Subject: The BOYS
Summary: All The Way
Keywords: C-O-W-B-O-Y-S
Organization: Intergraph
Distribution: rec
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 18:32:17 GMT

I would like to see the COWBOYS and the STEELERS go 
all the way and play each other in the S.B.!!!
Its about time those to teams were back in the 
top of the ranks!!!!
Go Cowboys!!!!

Hey Eagles! You had your chance and you blew it!!!
Thats to bad!! All that talk didn't do you any good!!


Doug 
The BOYS
The TIDE
Both are going all the way!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: Re: NEW ORLEANS
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 00:07:36 GMT

Michael.P.Colburn@dartmouth.edu (Michael P. Colburn) writes:
>Miami fans should be a bit
>worried... back to back away games against two powerful NFC teams

Miami fans should worry about back-to-back home-and-away games against
weak AFC East teams.


--Gidi	(go "marvelous" marv levy)


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: greg@puck.webo.dg.com ()
Subject: Re: Jets eat Fish for Lunch!
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 92 23:06:02 GMT
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: greg@puck.webo.dg.com
Organization: NSDD-X.500, Data General Corp.

In article <1992Nov1.212911.18290@wuecl.wustl.edu>, csm1@cec2.wustl.edu (Christopher Scott Macri) writes:
|> Surprise,surprise,surprise...26-14
|> 
|> Johnny Mitchell was truely awesome to watch, and to think Im still in college
|> and one year older than this gu!! O'brien looked good but I still see no
|> QB contreversy in the future. Lets face it the Jets have no shot for the 
|> postseason, keep Nagle in there! Get a high draft pick!
|> 
|> I wasnt the only Jet fan waiting for them to crumble in the second half
|> and they almost looked like they would lose their 23 pt. halftime lead
|> to a bad call and Marino's arm. 
|> 
|> But to my surprise the Jets (aka Jests) maintained their composure eating the
|> clock and dominating both sides of the line.     
|> 
|> They have always played Mia. hard but this was a true domination,
|> something that it worth SOME of the hard times.
|> 
|> The only Jet fan in St. Louis,
|> but proud today,
|> Chris
|> 
What I don't understand is why , whenever their offense does well in the first half
they never seem to do well in the second half, they only scored three points in the
2nd half, just pisses me off a little, by the way, WHAT A DIFFERENCE Cary Blanchard
makes, the guy is AWESOME,
 Greg
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
From: rjk@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Raymond K)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Date: 13 Nov 1992 13:35:01 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Howard Hughes Medical Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <1992Nov12.154322.11850@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>
>So you're claiming that the Cowboys intended to draft Ishmael when 
>they traded up?  I thought the official line from the Cowboys was that 
>this was not so.  And I think there were lots of Cowboys fans arguing 
>the opposite point last year in r.s.f.p.

No, I'm not claiming it.  They didn't intend to draft him.  What I said
was that they had the option to do many things, one of which was to keep
him, if they chose to.  I think the JJ's just tried to take advantage
of the "Rocket hysteria" sweeping the NFL.  But they understood if the
worst case scenario played out, it would not be that bad for them, since
they could get the player they really wanted, Maryland.

>Just about every other player in the 1st round?  Maybe.  Not all 
>certainly.  But again, not every team traded up in that draft.  Having 
>the #1 pick and getting a player that doesn't produce is a much 
>bigger disappointment than having the #28 pick and getting a player 
>that doesn't produce - especially if you traded up to get the #1 pick.

What you forget is how incredibly cheap it was for the Cowboys to
trade up for that #1 pick.  The NFL draftniks couldn't believe how
they could have pulled it off.  They started with 3 mid first round
picks and after the New England trade had 2 mid first round picks and
the number one pick in the entire draft.  It cost them some players
they would have cut anyway and a second round pick.

>Maryland has lots of career left.  He may turn into a monster DL.  But 
>at this point it looks like the Cowboys may have made a mistake.  ie. 
>He has to get much better for this trade to look like a good move.

Would it make any difference to you had Maryland been the 4th or 5th
player chosen in that draft?  If so, why?  Just because the FIRST
OVERALL pick better be head and shoulders better than everybody else?
There might have been six players that year worthy of being the top
choice overall, but none would have been left by the time the Cowboys
would have picked.  The Cowboys, at the very least, wanted one of those
top six players, and, at best, they wanted *their pick* of those six.
They tried to trade into the top five in that draft and they found that
they could just as easily get the top pick, without much more cost.
Having the top pick also has some nice advantages to it that #2 through #5
doesn't have, especially with a guy like the Rocket being coveted by many
teams.


Ray     GO COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: tes0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (THOMAS EDWIN SCHMIDLIN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Status of Jeff Graham (Pitts) and Barry Word (KC)?
Date: 10 Nov 92 09:44:20 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1992Nov9.225039.18827@mr.med.ge.com>, juvan@ct90.med.ge.com (Andy Ju
van 5-5060) writes:
>
>       Can anyone tell me what has happened to Jeff Graham, the young
>WR of the Steelers. After 4 games he was among the AFC leaders in
>receptions and yards. Since then I haven't seen his name much in the
>stats, and not at all this week. IS he hurt or did he lose his starting
>status?
>
>       Also, is Barry Word hurt? I know he had a bad thigh bruise or
>something, but I thought he was expected to play this week.
>
>       Thanks in advance for any info.
>

Graham is still playing, he's just not getting that many passes.  He didn't
catch any passes sunday against the bills, but I'd swear he was in the game.
The week before, he caught one pass for 11 yards against the oilers.
-- 


Tom Schmidlin       DEEP THOUGHTS: By Jack Handey - I wish a robot would
TES0@LEHIGH.EDU         get elected president.  That way, when he came
215-758-0875            to town, we could all take a shot at him and not
                        feel too bad.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ables@hal.com (King Ables)
Subject: Re: Texas Stadium (was Re: Indoor vs. Outdoor (was Re: WIZARD PREDICTIONS!!!!!!!!!!!)
Organization: HaL Computer Systems, Inc.
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 23:37:33 GMT

>>large as the football field.  It is also not completely enclosed on
>>the side - that is, the roof sits up a few feet above the base.  
> 
> Actually, I think that has been eliminated since they put in the skyboxes.
> That is, the only hole in the stadium is on top.  Now that I think about it,
> I know this is right because I was on the top row for a game last year.  
> Anyway, this makes Texas Stadium a REALLY hot place to be in August and
> September as it basically eliminated any breeze that might have come into the 
> stadium.

Yeah, they filled it in to put some expensive skyboxes in and it *really*
sucks.  You used to get a great breeze through the small gap between the
top of the stands and the bottom of the roof (about 1-2 floors of space).
The breeze would cascade down one side of the stands, across the field
and back up and out the other side... wonderful crossbreeze.  Now it's just
stifling.  They might as well fill in the hole in the top and install A/C.
---------------------------------------------------------------
King Ables                    HAL Computer Systems, Inc.
ables@hal.com                 8920 Business Park Dr., Suite 300
+1 512 794 2855               Austin, TX  78759
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug."
				-- Dire Straits & Mary-Chapin Carpenter