HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Subject: Re: Rice vs. Baylor (was: Re: Trevor Cobb 6, Lloyd Hill 0)
Reply-To: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 23:16:34 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.171319.15024@hou.amoco.com> zcjm0f@nvplota.uucp (CJohn  
Mace) writes:
> 
> >> Tom Scudder                    tomscud@ruf.rice.edu
> >> "It's 106 miles to Chicago, we have a full tank of gas, a half pack of
> >> cigarettes, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses."
> >> "Hit it."
> >
> >..and the witty signature helps, though I am not purporting myself to 
> >be the second coming of the woofing gods gift to the world.  
> >
> >Is the Rice game at Baylor?  If so, I wonder if Rice will look as slow
> >on the natural turf as they did in Durham...
> 
> Don't you just love it when your ignorance shines like the sun!!!
> 
> Baylor plays on turf...  and I bet you don't run very fast in a quagmire
> either.

The 1992 Rice Media Guide said that 1 SWC school was replacing their
their artificial turf with Natural Grass.  I'm pretty sure it was
Baylor - but maybe the change is not until next year.  I'll check
the source and post again later.

And Duke's defenders sure ran faster than Cobb in that quagmire
(pretty obvious from the press box) and believe me, I know how
slow they are.

--
************* "How about a little fire, Scarecrow?" **************
Orin Day, Code 664.1                    oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov
Hughes STX/NASA       GSFC Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics
*******"Think that this is NASA's opinion?   NO, NO, NO!!!" ******
From: ongsakul@ee.tamu.edu (Ongsakul Weerakorn)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: what if....
Date: 11 Nov 92 20:13:04 GMT
Article-I.D.: tamsun.1992Nov11.201304.12357
Organization: Texas A&M University

lein@cat.uucp (John Leinaweaver) writes:

>What if Miami loses leaving Alabama and Texas A&M the only undefeated
>teams in the cartel.  Would they be allowed to play each other
>someplace?
>
>John L

If this scenario happens, it is not possible for them to play each other
for a national champion.  SWC and SEC champion is locked to the Cotton
and Sugar bowl respectively. 

Ong
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: bjm1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Bobbie J. Mann)
Subject: Re: SWC jumpers
Organization: Mississippi State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 10:42:12 GMT

seale@bcserv.wustl.edu (Seale (Jeff)) writes:

>Let those who secretly or knowingly contemplate leaving the
>SWC for the "greener" pastures beware!!
>Ask our former friends from Arkansas what happens when you leave.
>Can you really be happy not having a cake-walk throughb the
>conference every year and the automatic bowl bids?
>I hope playing inthe Southern Wimpy Conference all these years
>hasn't given you a false sense of greatness!


Well, joining the SEC has nothing to do with Arkansas' losing streak this year.  Arkansas was in the SWC the last two years, and both of them were also not up
to past ARK standards.  ARK would probably still be having problems even if they were in the weaker SWC.
Arkansas will continue to have problems until we can find a good coach who can
motivate the players and who knows how to win ball-games.  And no, Danny Ford
has said he has no interest in the ARk position, he supports the interim coach
Joe Kines.

Go Hogs! Beat MSU

Roland

>-Jeff (The third best team in the Southern Wimpy Conference) Seale

>Go Tech!! or is it Geaux Tech?!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason Fawcett)
Subject: Re: IA championship playoffs
Reply-To: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett)
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 23:29:23 GMT

News-Software: NN 6.4.16

In <randall.720920960@seashore> randall@informix.com (Randall Rhea) writes:
| 
| 6) In the end, only one school would be celebrating.  The rest
| would be yelling "we was robbed."   That does not sound
| like fun to me.

With your oppinion, why even keep score.  Then both teams could go home 
happy.  We didn't hear the Buffalo Bills say " we was robbed " after
last years superbowl.   But, with this AP/USA beauty pageant teams are
getting robbed.  Last year East Carolina was 11-1, but they didn't have
a chance to get voted NC if they went 12-0.  Why because its a beauty
pageant, not a contest to prove who is #1.  The Sugar Bowl didn't ask
a higher ranked East Carolina,  they took a #17 Notre Dame that was
8-3.  Why because ND brings in more money than East Carolina.  Bowls
only intention is  making $$$ .   

That's why we need a fair playoff system, one that would let the cinderellas
of the world have a chance to be the best of the best.  The whole point
of a sports contest is to have a winner and a loser.   Sure its hard, but
its a lesson in life.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: TJFAN@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: USC Arizona
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 17:14:00 GMT
Distribution: na
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.14 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: TJFAN@WATSON.IBM.COM
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

In  <1992Nov9.065832.29082@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>  sfm@manduca.neurobio.arizona.edu (Stephen Matheson) writes:
> You may be wrong, indeed.  The Cats are ranked #9 and the Trojans #18
> by AP.  Since the Trojans enjoy the home-field advantage (for what it's
> worth in LA), and have some impressive outings to their credit, I doubt
> Arizona will be favored by any more than 2, if at all.  We'll see
> tomorrow.
> 
In fact, the Trojans are 2-point favored in the Vegas Line. I really doubt this.
I think they should be at least 1 TD underdog.

I hope I'm wrong.

--

  UU    UU        CCCCCC
  UU    UU       CC    CC
  UU    UU       CC               T. J. FAN, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
  UU    UU SSSSS CC
  UU    UUSS   SSCC    CC         - A Trojan Fan and ND Hater
   UUUUUU SSSS    CCCCCC
             SSSS
          SS   SS
           SSSSS
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rhouston@glacier.sim.es.com (Richard Houstan)
Subject: Re: Sunday morning QB
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp.
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 22:31:14 GMT

In article <40765@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi) writes:

   o After all that, SDSU still controls it's destiny to the Holiday Bowl.
     They have to beat Hawaii and Fresno St at home in the next 2 weeks.

Is this true? If SDSU wins its next 2 games and BYU looses one that makes a tie between
Hawaii and SDSU (assuming Hawaii wins its other game) sending SDSU to the holiday bowl 
because of the head to head tie breaker.

What happens if BYU wins both it's games, making a 3 way tie? Does SDSU go because it
beat both BYU and Hawaii, or is there a different tie breaking scheme?

				Richard
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: aboufadel@scsuc.ctstateu.edu (ABOUFADEL,E)
Subject: Bowl Game for Michigan State?
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Southern Connecticut State University - Computer Center
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 15:52:00 GMT

If the Spartans win their last two games (a reasonable possibility -- they
play Purdue at home and then the finale at Illinois), it will give them a
6-2 Big Ten record (which, I admit, doesn't say much this year) and a 6-5
overall record, which means that they get past one hurdle towards a bowl bid:
6 wins.

Now, I'm not talking about any presigious bowl here, but how about something
like the Hall of Fame bowl or one of those other pre-New Year "Extravaganzas"?

Actually, there are a few Big Ten schools in this position, where a late 
season win or two could give make them look somewhat attractive to a bowl.
And the Big Ten teams have a reputation of bringing a lot of fans to these
bowl games.

Any thoughts?

Ed Aboufadel
MSU '86


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jay@puppsr12.Princeton.EDU (Jay Shrauner)
Subject: Re: STANFORD/ARIZONA TRASH
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 19:39:18 GMT

In article <1dovu2INN2v6@skat.usc.edu> valdis@skat.usc.edu (Valdis Kalejs) writes:
>Also a recent SI issue declared them 
>one of the best in the nation. Sorry... Didnt see Stanford's band listed any-
>where...

Yes well, let sports magazines stick to sports and music magazines stick
to music, that's what I think.  I do recall a spread in Rolling Stone
magazine summer of 1987 on the Stanford Band--they called them "the world's
largest rock and roll band" and generally extolled the care free FUN of
the Stanford band.

I don't think Rolling Stone ever cared to say much about U$C, eh?  Unless,
of course, they picked the football team to beat Stanford this year, and
you depend on them for your informed sports opinion?

Jay Shrauner
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: UA&AU
Date: 5 Nov 92 16:00:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: dip.BILLMS.92Nov5110015
Distribution: rec
Organization: University of Michigan

In article <1992Nov5.152202.6321@b15.ingr.com> pruett@b15.ingr.com (Debbie Pruett) writes:

   I am an eager Bama fan who is waiting on the
   total destruction of Auburn !!
   This is the year that Bama should run away with
   it!!! I am looking for at least a 20 to 30 point
   blowout!!!!

   Roll Tide 
   REVENGE ON THE HURRICANES ON NEW YEARS DAY
   WE WILL NOT BE DENIED!!!!!!!!!

This is a very troubling turn of events.  This posting seems to indicate that
Debbie has learned a netnews command, i.e. "post".  Expect the level of
discussion to rise, considerably.

Whats the revenge factor with Miami, here?  Did I forget some historic drubbing
that Alabama has been mulling over for years?

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: kitchel@manta.dpsi.com (Sidney W. Kitchel)
Subject: Re: Nebraska beats Colorado
Organization: Data Parallel Systems, Inc
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 13:46:06 GMT

tomd@solbourne.com (Tom Diessner) writes:
>In article <1992Nov3.174533.24107@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com> m_henderson@csc32.enet.dec.com (Marty Henderson) writes:
>>I was not going to say anything untill you folks had the balls to talk trash
>>EVEN NOW!!! Grow up. Notice that this post is Tuesday. Monday I said nothing
>>to stir up the storm. I'm only laying it on today since I'm reading this krap
>>flowing out of Boulder.
>>Husker Henderson

>Other mindless dribble deleted

>How old are you Marty? This has got to be the most immature ranting I have
>ever read on this network. The game is over, thank goodness, and Nebraska
>whipped Colorado. Life goes on. Please put a cork in it!!!!!

	Awwwwwwww noooooooooo!! Are little buffies unhappy??? You mean
you didn't line up and knock over all the Big8 folks this year?? No
MNC either??? How sad??
	Why just last year you were telling us that the CU dynasty
would never end. You would never lose another Big8 game and would have
no problem beating Miami, Flaw. anyplace, anytime. How rapidly times
change!! I'll see if I can locate some spare kleenex to send toward
the mountains.

	Ohhh, but wait:  someone has just given Coach Mac (Colo.
division) a copy of the Kinsey Report. He is livid, he is outraged. He
may have to file a protest with the Big8 Commissioner. If Kinsey is
correct, NU could have had 10% gays on their team. It surely must be
against the rules to force good, clean, Christian buffies to face evil
gay ringers out in the pure corn fields. Coach Mac vows revenge and
prays for righteousness and goodness to triumph......and some good
recruiting for insurance.

						soONEr bred!!!,
						      --Sid
--
Sidney W. Kitchel  	    kitchel@cs.indiana.edu, kitchel@dpsi.com
Data Parallel Systems, Inc.  ============||  DPSI  ||===============
4617 E. Morningside Drive	                      (812) 334-8100
Bloomington, Indiana,  47408  USA		FAX:  (812) 334-8121
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason Fawcett)
Subject: Re: SEC East shoots itself in the foot
Reply-To: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett)
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 05:51:42 GMT

News-Software: NN 6.4.16

In <1992Nov5.151538.19392@afit.af.mil> tbreeden@afit.af.mil (Thomas A. Breeden) writes:

| In article <Bx7F3G.ox@encore.com> jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett) writes:
| >News-Software: NN 6.4.16
| >| 
| >
| >  The way I see it.  Bama or Florida willl chicken out like last year and 
| >  get the Sugar Bowl to invite another  team that maybe a SEC champ could
| 
| Florida wanted Miami to come to the Sugar Bowl, you idiot.  The chicken-
| canes had nothing to gain by playing Florida, and Notre Dame threatened
| the SEC committee...
| 
| Anyway, win or lose, Florida (at least) is not *chicken*.  Quit spewing
| at the keyboard, Fawcett.

Look up the word INVITATION.  First the bowl sends out the invitation.
Then the schools accepts the invitation.  This all started because that
lier Steve " just the FAX" Spurrier stood on his soap box and cried
that Florida lost it's shot at the National Champioship.  Did the
Sugar even try and get Miami.  The Miami AD said  that "  The  Sugar
Bowl led us to believe they had other plans that didn't include Miami".
That statement came before the Blockbuster and the Orange statement.
Why will you accept the bowl statement, but not the first statement.


Steve Spurrier lied.  Just like he did about the Fax from Tennessee.  
Spurs stood up on his soapbox, and said if Miami would raise a little
hell they could get Notre Dame replaced.  Well that was not Miami's
job.  If Steve had done his job maybe the gators could have beat ND.
Every day some reporter asks Steve the same question;

         "  Why won't Florida play Miami".

Fact Florida walked away from Miami's schedule.  If you lezzards had left
Miami on the schedule and somehow beat Miami, then it wouldn't have been
a problem last year now would it.  

The director of the NCAA gave the Sugar Bowl a warring last year for
picking a #17 team that had three losses, over higher ranked teams of
#6 Calf., PSU, East Carolina and one other team maybe Stanford.

Somehow the Sugar by-passed all thoes other teams.  Why don't you call
them chicken.  Why did the Sugar Bowl say that Notre Dame was our first
choice.  If Steve Spurrier had a problem with the Sugar Bowl why didn't
he go to them to get it to offer Miami a invitation.  Get one thing
right Miami would risk any thing just to get a chance at the gators.
Why don't you ask the teams in the SEC why none of them will play 
Miami on the normal scheule.


| 
| By the way, did anyone see the Gator's number 1 alum, Emmitt Smith, say
| he was an "honorary Hurricane" on ESPN?  Hmmm...
| 
| 
| Andy
| 
| 
|
From: tonyf@rm1.interlan.com (Tony Fernandez)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: The Eagles have landed (and State of Coll...)
Date: 12 Nov 92 20:56:01 GMT
Organization: Racal-Milgo, Sunrise, Florida

In article <1992Nov11.073823.17845@netcom.com>, shyam@netcom.com (Shyam K. Subramanyan) writes:
>In article <BxHI3J.IIu@encore.com> jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett) writes:
>
>>Since the lezzards won't play Miami,  you guys have to put a extra whipping
>>on them for us.
>If you wanted to play us that much, I wonder why Miam ran away from
>New Orleans? Dont give shit about not being invited.  We were there and
>waiting.  You may get a chance to play us this year, mebbe you won't chicken
>out this time.

That would have been real funny, Florida, Notre Dame and Miami all showing
up to play in the Sugar Bowl.  I guess that's what happened in the game.  
You were waiting for the Canes to show up instead of playing Notre Dame.
Say whatever you want, Miami was not asked to come to the Sugar last year.

And forget about playing us this year.  If Florida by any chance happens
to beat Alabama, Miami will be playing Texas A&M or Nebraska which are
better teams.  You see, if Miami were to play Florida instead of those
other two, that would be chickening out.  Miami must lose and fall on the
polls below FSU and Notre Dame for that to happen.

>>
>>Go Noles kick the lezzards into Georgia.
>The Noles(Ugh!) are gonna kick themseleves outta Florida & it will be
>Miami's turn in the sugar bowl, that is if they don't chicken out again.

As opposed to Florida, which chickens out every year for not playing 
Miami during the regular season.

>-- 
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Shyam Subramanyan			shyam@netcom.com
>
>A damn proud UF (The only real University in Florida) Alumni
>
>Go Gators....
>------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 

Tony L. Fernandez

Racal-Datacom, Network Management         Phone: (305) 846-6553
1601 N. Harrison Parkway                  INET : tonyf@sun1.interlan.com
Sunrise, FL 33323-2899                    

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             1993 Florida Marlins Opening Day Countdown:  152 days             
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: stassen@alc.com (Chris Stassen)
Subject: CFPOOL: Week #12 Entry
Organization: The Lion's Den, San Jose
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 01:55:39 GMT


Notes:	This is the last regular season week for the pool.  There are
	some interesting games left in the season, but there aren't 
	enough for a pool next week and several teams play on Thursday
	or Friday instead of Saturday.

	The final pool, Bowl Games, will be posted as soon as all of
	the participating teams have been determined.  That'll probably
	be about two weeks away.

	I apologize for the entry this week.  Several of the "traditional
	rivalry" games (UW-WSU, OSU-UM, Arizona-ASU) don't look so
	difficult to pick and many teams have the week off.  Thus, the
	Big Ten and Pac-10 (who finish this week) are a little over-
	represented and the pool is easier than usual.

Game list for 11/21 (18 games):
$
	Akron at Cincinnati
	Arizona State at Arizona
	Brigham Young at Utah
	Colorado State at New Mexico
	East Carolina at Memphis State
	Fresno State at San Diego State
	Houston at Texas Tech
	Indiana at Purdue
	Miami at Syracuse
	Michigan State at Illinois
	Michigan at Ohio State
	North Carolina at Duke
	Southern Cal at UCLA
	Stanford at California
	Texas at Baylor
	Virginia at Virginia Tech
	Washington at Washington State
	Wisconsin at Northwestern

Reminders:	Don't forget to order your predictions by 'confidence.'
		A recap sheet is sent to those entered by Wednesday (10/18).
--
Chris Stassen			408-943-0630			stassen@alc.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: scott@ods.com (Scott Harper)
Subject: Re: AP top 10 remaining games, Syracuse road to the top
Organization: Optical Data Systems, Inc.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 18:18:00 GMT

robert.dieckmann (rowdy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com) wrote:
: What happens if Syracuse beats BC but loses to Miami, as expected?
: Where does Syracuse (at 9-2) go bowling?  Reportedly, Joe Paterno
: has rejected Syracuse as an opponent for the Blockbuster Bowl.

What, this guy not only gets to pick his bowl, but the opponent too?
Just who does he think he is, Bill Walsh?  Let's just hope he never
ends up at Notre Dumb...   :)

Seriously, though, does PState really get to approve/disapprove who
the BBowl folks invite to play against them?
-- 
Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081
From: bakken@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Bakken)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Apple Cup (was Re: Washington vs. Arizona)
Date: 9 Nov 92 22:42:56 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <X2A=70#@engin.umich.edu> chyang@australorp.engin.umich.edu (Chung Hsiung Yang) writes:
>
>In article <26036@optima.cs.arizona.edu>, bakken@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Bakken) writes:
>	If the Huskies were undefeated.  Yes, I will agree with you that
>they should be weary of the Cougers.  But not after the heartbreaking lost
>to Arizona.  The monkey's off Washington's back now.  They can be as good
>as they want to be.  
>
>	It it not arrogance.  Its percentages.  Do you seriously think
>that the team with the talent of the Huskies would play as poorly as they
>did against Arizona two weeks in a role?  

No, I would be much more concerned if the Apple Cup were the week after
the UA upset of the UW.  That would move the Cougars chances of winning
from .40 to .20, in my estimation.  Fortunately, it is not.

>	I feel bad for OSU because the Huskies will let off some steam 
>next week against them.

Yup.  They will be molested Saturday.
--
Dave Bakken                               Internet: bakken@cs.arizona.edu
Dept. of Computer Science; U of Arizona   Voice:    +1 602 621 4098      
Tucson, AZ 85721; USA                     FAX:      +1 602 621 4246
The fact that you're paranoid doesn't prove they're *not* out to get you.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason Fawcett)
Subject: Re: Lee Corso's latest prediction
Reply-To: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett)
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 22:46:10 GMT

News-Software: NN 6.4.16

In <1992Nov6.212823.11740@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> kkc@stat.nursing.arizona.edu (Kee Koon Chua) writes:

| Lee Corso has been predicting a Washington's loss since the first week of
| the season. It seems like he has something personal against Washington.
| As for Miami, it is always #1 to him regardless of how bad Miami played or
| how well Washington played.

No way.  Corso is NOT a MIAMI fan.  He predicted Iowa , FSU and PSU would
beat Miami.  Didn't Corso played QB at FSU? 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: bonacci@ecf.toronto.edu (BONACCI John)
Subject: Re: Koontz Computer Predictions 11-14
Keywords: NCAA, Computer Predictions
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
Distribution: rec
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:31:22 GMT

In article <26314@optima.cs.arizona.edu> bakken@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Bakken) writes:
>In article <1277@fozzy.UUCP> ckoontz@aud.alcatel.com writes:
>>Here are the predictions by my computer algorithm.  This is my first try
>
>This is a joke, right?

Joke or not, some of the responses as well as another message or two today
have pointed out something I would ask someone to explain...
Why hasn't any individual or algorithm picked Michigan by gobs and gobs
over Illinois?  Other games have been predicted to have large margins for this
week.  Is there something I'm missing out on here?  Is there a logical,
objective reason in support of Illinois giving Michigan a run for their
money?  Make my week, I'm an Illini fan.

Just wondering...
JB
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: crobbins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Chris S. Robbins)
Subject: Re: Best of the Eighties (BOWL BOUND)
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 20:36:47 GMT


>Wildcard game:            I don't know about this one.  '83 Texas
>Texas A&M ('85): 26       was a damn good team.  However, since I'm
>Texas     ('83): 23       biased I could be off.


Chris Robbins aka "No le hace."  "My THREE favorite teams are the Longhorns,
Sigma Tau Gamma Fraternity        Roadrunners, and whoever plays a@m!!!"
The University of Texas at San Antonio has adopted U.T. fb until we get a team.
Longhorn Football- National Champions- 1963, 1969, 1970.
Roadrunner B-Ball- 1990, 1991 TAAC Champs, 1992 Southland Conference Champs.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college