HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 11:07:00 EST
From:         Ron Johnston <ADLB001@MVS.MCGILL.CA>
Subject:      LB720 reports
Comments: To: Notis Discussion <NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.TULANE.EDU>

Deborah Coleman writes:

   "We ... run LB720 monthly with yearly statistics.  This keeps all the
   months on the yearly report until we run LB740...."

Attached is a local change to 5.0.2 version of LB720.  I believe it
restores the original purpose of the YEARLY option, that is, to
summarize the entire year in a single report of year-to-date numbers.

Without this change, the YEARLY option seems to give the same results
as the MONTHLY option assuming that in both cases the FROMDATE and
TODATE are set to cover the entire year.

I have reported this as a bug fix to NSI.  If they accept the change,
then you will no longer be getting each and every month when you use
YEARLY with a date range covering the calendar year.  But I think you
can get it using MONTHLY anyway.

Ron Johnston  McGill University Libraries  Montreal Quebec

voice:        (514) 398-4797          |    S/390  ES/9000-320
fax:          (514) 398-7356          |    MVS/XA  CICS 1.7
internet:     ADLB001@MVS.MCGILL.CA   |    NOTIS 4.7
bitnet:       ADLB001@MCGILLVS        |    GTO 2-Utlas
telnet:       132.206.27.5            |    GTO 3-Bibliofile
                        =====//=====
VAL2DAT2 EQU   *                                                        03040000
         MVO   DSNDATEY,PSICDAT(3)  MOVE NEW CCYY DATE TO WORK FIELD    03050000
         CLC   DSNDATEY(2),DSRDATEY IS THIS REC YEAR NOT SAME AS PREV?  03060000
         BNE   PRINTST2             BR IF YES TO PRINT STATISTICS       03070000
*        MVO   DSNDATEY,PSICDAT(3) MOVE NEW CCYY DATE TO WORK FIELD  RJ 03080008
*        CLC   DSNDATEY,DSRDATEY   IS REC MONTH NOT SAME AS PREV?    RJ 03090008
*        BNE   PRINTST2            BR IF YES TO PRINT STATISTICS     RJ 03100008
ACCUMST2 EQU   *                                                        03110000
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 09:14:31 -0600
From:         U192@SYSM.ACS.VIRGINIA.EDU
Subject:      ABII MDAS Initial load
Comments: To: notis-l@tcsvm.bitnet

We are trying to do an initial load of ABII.  We run MPC650B to
create the Bib file, but are confused as to why there are
delete records created????  Any way, we cannot create an XREF
file to process update tapes or apply the delete records because
we get a "U066" in MPC680 trying to create the XREF file (which
is required to apply updates or deletes).  We have been told by
NOTIS that U066 means we have duplicates.

Has anyone else had this problem or any ideas on how to get
around this problem???  We are just about out of ideas and
would appreciate ANY help or suggestions.

Thanks in advance,

Russ Dinsmore - Tech 1
University of Virginia
rd2h@virginia.edu
(804) 924-1052
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Southeastern Louisiana University
X-Envelope-to: notis-l@TCSVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN"notis-l@tcsvm.bitnet"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 11:01:22 -0500
From:         Kevin Calmes <TMIS1692@VEGA.SELU.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Terminals in shelves

At SLU, we do not bolt the terminals down.  They are left free standing.  We
have been fortunate that we have OPAC users who don't abuse the equipment.
The terminals are locked into the LUSL transaction so that's all they can do.

Kevin Calmes - TMIS1692@selu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 08:18:58 CST
From:         "Gary L. Strawn" <GSTRAWN@NUACVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Non-indexing 6xx/7xx's

Certain types of errors in fields (such as "subfields out of sequence") cause
the indexing program to stop working on a record. Index entries completed
before the error occurs are passed along, but no attempt is made to finish
the record. Fixing the error allows work on the record to be completed.

Gary L. Strawn
Authorities Librarian, etc., Northwestern University Libraries
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Central Michigan University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 09:25:03 EST
From:         DAN KIRCHNER <344PWCF@CMUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Thanks for Responses to Patron Ov'ly Problem (CHAT)

Thanks to Suzanna Lengyel and Alan Alexander-Manifold for your responses
to my query.  It was helpful to have another viewpoint(s) and the benefit of
your collective braincells.  Thanks for your help!
Dan Kirchner - CMU
From: MADEWELL@VUCTRVAX.BITNET
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Subject: Re: UPDATED......not
Date: 18 Nov 92 18:38:30 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

The UPDATED field beside the patron address now changes (under version 5.1)
if you modify the address online.  I haven't tested to see if it changes
with batch loads.
_______________________________________________________________________________
/ Ramona Steffey Madewell              /               Bitnet:                /
/ Automation Project Librarian (LIB1)  /          MADEWELL@VUCTRVAX           /
/ Vanderbilt University                /              Internet:               /
/ Library Systems                      /    madewell@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu    /
/ 419 21st Avenue South                /       Phone: (615) 322-7125          /
/ Nashville, TN  37240                 /         Fax: (615) 343-0394          /
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 11:33:42 EST
From:         Betsy Hine <LIBHINE@INDST.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Non-indexing 6xx/7xx's

We had this same problem recently at Indiana State University.  Is this
new?  The error message we got was "subfield out of sequence" or something
like that.  When I went into the record and changed the error to the right
subfield, the 6xx's and 7xx's that followed the 650 with the error indexed!
We've never noticed this problem before this specific instance.  We're
running 5.1 (including build c) here.

Betsy Hine, Head
Monographic Cataloging
Cunningham Memorial Library
Indiana State University
Terre Haute, IN  47809
libhine@indst.bitnet@indst.indstate.edu.internet
(812)237-2573
From: LENGYEL@YALEVM.BITNET (Suzanna Lengyel)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Subject: Printers, again
Date: 18 Nov 92 18:26:50 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

My colleague, Shiva Prasad, has asked me to post the following question on the
List:

What printer would you recommend that
(1) is quiet, i.e., it is an inkjet printer, not a dot matrix printer,
(2) is suitable for use in public areas,
(3) can print diacritics.

In your answer, please give the model number, the price, and the vendor.

At present, we are using Canon BJ-80A printers.

Thank you very much.

Suzanna Lengyel.  Yale University Library Systems Office. E-mail:
lengyel@yalevm.  Phone: (203) 432-1844.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 141
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:32:00 EST
From:         bryan@WILEY.CSUSB.EDU
Subject:      KeyNotis
Comments: To: notis-l@vm.tcs.tulane.edu

Are any other KeyNotis monitoring this list?

Please answer back to the list so we will all know. Thanks.

Beverly Ryan
CSU, San Bernardino
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Vms-To: IN%"NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 08:18:18 -0600
From:         "Linda M. Olson,
              Assistant Library Director" <Linda.M.Olson@UWRF.EDU>
Subject:      Re: KeyNotis
Comments: To: NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU

U.W.-River Falls is a new KeyNotis site.  We are in the beginning stages
of implementation and are very interested in sharing and learning of KeyNotis
 concerns.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linda M. Olson
Assistant Library Director
Davee Library
U.W.-River Falls
River Falls, WI  54022
715-425-3799

Internet: Linda.M.Olson@uwrf.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Vmsmail-To: SMTP%"NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU"
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:25:45 -0600
From:         LEIGH WILLIAMS <F_WILLIAMS@CCSVAX.SFASU.EDU>
Subject:      RE: DFLCT100 NEWCOPY Summary and thanks
Comments: To: NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU

Kevin, here's the scoop on the CECI transaction.  IBM ships this
transaction (in CSD groups VSESPG and DFHINTER) with RSL set to 0 and
RSLC (resource security level checking) set to YES.  The net effect of
coding it this way is that *nobody*, including the sysadmin, can use
the transaction.

I created a new group with the CEDA command and called it CECI.  I
then copied IBM's version and reset RSL to 24, TRANSEC to 64, and RSLC
to NO.  Whenever I need to use CECI, I install this group through CEDA
INSTALL GROUP (CECI) to override IBM's default.  Then I can use it,
assuming I'm patient enough; you can bring the RES count down, but it
goes up *real* fast when you're in production.  BTW, I'm the only one
who can use the transaction because of how I've got the CICS security
keys and resource security classes set for my users -- I'm pretty
careful about that.

Leigh Williams
Manager of Library Computing
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, TX 75961
409-568-1421   F_WILLIAMS@CCSVAX.SFASU.EDU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 13:29:55 CST
Comments:     Resent-From: HSAMUELS@UA1VM
Comments:     Originally-From: Kevin Calmes <TMIS1692@VEGA.SELU.EDU>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was NOTIS-L@TCSVM
From:         HSAMUELS@UA1VM.BITNET
Subject:      DFLCT100 NEWCOPY

>I am running DOS/VSE/SP 3.1.2  CICS 1.7 (without RDO) and LMS 4.6.1
>I changed the end of semester dates in LC102TSL and have re-assembled LC102BAL
>and have re-linked.  Now I am trying to do CEMT S PR(DFLCT100) NEW to make the
>change effective and the following messages appears:
>
>Pro(DFLCT100) Len(0032176) Res(044) Use(000045) Ass Dis    IN USE, DISABLED
>
>Should I do CEMT S PR(DFLCT100) ENA then try to do the NEWCOPY?  Seems like
>once before I did a NEWCOPY on DFLCT100 when it was in this state and then
>accidentally did a NEWCOPY on DFLCA205 without realizing the NEWCOPY didn't
>take effect on DFLCT100 yet and ended up with a mismatched set of programs.

I think you've disabled DFLCT100 which means big trouble.  In order to NEWCOPY
a module, I believe Res must equal (000). I made this mistake before. I can't
remember how we recovered but restarting the system will definitely fix things.
I make it a point to never NEWCOPY DFLCT100 and DFLCA205. I just let them
get pulled in when the system is restarted the next day.

Harry Samuels
Programmer/Analyst (TECH 1)
University of Alabama
Bitnet: HSAMUELS@UA1VM
Internet: HSAMUELS@UA1VM.UA.EDU
Voice: (205) 348-2877
Fax: (205) 348-9170
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Return-Path: <batista@a1.relay.upenn.edu>
Msg-Class: ALL-IN-1 V2.3 BL8-4 Rev. AAC 20-Dec-1988
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 17:07:01 -0500
From:         "Emily Batista" <batista@A1.RELAY.UPENN.EDU>
Subject:      Fine info on notices
Comments: To: notis-l@tcsvm.bitnet

Recently we noticed that our recall and overdue notices are no longer
printed with our fine amounts on them.  Before we moved to 5.0.2 (from
4.6), our recall notices automatically included the recall fine that would
apply if the item were not returned by the recall due date.  Likewise,
overdue notices warned patrons that fines were accruing at ten cents a day
from the due date.  Now this wording has disappeared.

Has anyone else had this experience?  The programmer working on this has
not found a problem in our code.  I had assumed that this fine info popped
up automatically so long as the circ policy for the patron category, etc,
included a penalty for overdues or recalls.

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.

Emily Batista, Coordinator, Circulation Services, University of
Pennsylvania Libraries   215-898-7557   fax 215-898-0559
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN%"NOTIS-L@TCSVM.BITNET"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 07:39:31 -0600
From:         MADEWELL@VUCTRVAX.BITNET
Subject:      Re: O'brien

If anyone wants to add their site to the open NSI problem (apostrophes
in keyword), cite PPQ8208.  Thanks.  --Ramona Madewell, Vanderbilt
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 08:32:05 -0600
From:         Barbara Baruth <baruth@CS.UWP.EDU>
Subject:      Re: KeyNotis
Comments: To: NOTIS discussion group list <NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU>

The University of Wisconsin--Parkside expects to bring KeyNotis up
sometime in 1993.  I have been monitoring this list for several
months.

Barb Baruth
Library/Learning Center
University of Wisconsin--Parkside

On Mon, 16 Nov 1992 bryan@WILEY.CSUSB.EDU wrote:

> Are any other KeyNotis monitoring this list?
>
> Please answer back to the list so we will all know. Thanks.
>
> Beverly Ryan
> CSU, San Bernardino
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:25:34 EST
From:         "ADKO000 Kathleen Olivier - Computer Center" <ADKO@NMUMUS.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: DFLCT100 NEWCOPY

In our earlier and more naive days we tried new copying table changes
and ended up with a glorious mess (due to out of synch programs) curable
only by bouncing CICS.  As a rule of thumb, we NEVER, EVER, (even if
someone whines for it) newcopy tables with the system up (except in TEST
-- which is kind of fun to blow up on occasion.) I believe NOTIS too,
has cautioned on the folly of doing this.  We too are still at 4.6.1 and
lacking the luxury of online tables.  If we really really really need
the table change immediately we bounce the system.  Hope this helps.  If
nothing else, misery loves company.

Kathleen Olivier
Northern Michigan University (UPRLC, Inc.)
adko@nmumus
(906)227-1279
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 11:51:46 -0600
From:         Barbara <baughman@UTDALLAS.EDU>
Subject:      Re: LOAN CODE
Comments: To: NOTIS discussion group list <NOTIS-L@VM.TCS.Tulane.EDU>
              20 Nov 1992 10:11:54 -0600 from <ZIMMRMAN@ACCDVM.ACCD.EDU>

The loan code is part of the record key in the LCRFILE for a circulation
situation.  You can't change any part of a record key as a matter of system
design.

Barbara Baughman
TECH1
University of Texas at Dallas
(214) 690-2157
BAUGHMAN@UTDALLAS.EDU
From: TMIS1692@VEGA.SELU.EDU (Kevin Calmes)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Subject: DFLCT100 NEWCOPY Summary and thanks
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:00:35 GMT
Organization: Southeastern Louisiana University
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Envelope-to: notis-l@TCSVM.BITNET
X-VMS-To: IN"notis-l@tcsvm.bitnet"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Thanks to all who responded to the DFLCT100 NEWCOPY problem. (See NOTISes June
91 V618 for a related problem.  I did not have this problem until after GTO)

I tried to CECI RELEASE PROGRAM ('DFLCT100') right off the bat when I couldn't
do the CEMT S PR(DFLCT100) NEW.  First I got the PGMIDERR message since the
program was DISabled and I did a CEMT S PR(DFLCT100) ENA and tried the CECI
again.  This time I got the NOTAUTH message which I find rather strange since
the user profile (SYSA) gives me the right to do it all (RSL 1-24, SCTKEY 1-64,
etc) so since we don't have a customized DFHSNTxx, I suppose I will have to
check that out in order to use CECI which by the way, I was talking about to
another NOTISer and we were pondering the implications of what effect CECI has
on the rest of the community if you RELEASE PROGRAM('DFLCT100').  By the way, a
recycle of CICS did NOT fix it.  I had to re-IPL.

Thanks again,

Kevin

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*  Kevin Calmes                           Internet: TMIS1692@SELU.EDU         *
*  Library Programmer - TECH1             IP#       147.174.1.5               *
*  Computing Services - MIS               Voice:    (504) 549-3645            *
*  Southeastern Louisiana University      Fax:      (504) 549-5092            *
*  Box 409 SLU Station                    IBM 4361-M5  DOS/VSE/SP 3.1.2       *
*  Hammond, LA  70402   USA               VTAM 3.1  CICS 1.7  VSE/POWER 2.3   *
*                                         NOTIS 4.6.1  GTO 3.0                *
*  "S'cuse me while I kiss the sky"       Location: 30.30.15N  90.27.40W      *
*                     Jimi Hendrix                                            *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: (no subject given)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 16:28:04 EST
From:         SCILIBS@YALEVM.BITNET
Comments: To: listserv@YALEVM.BITNET, notis-l@tcsvm.BITNET

set notis-l nomail
From: SC6@CORNELLC.BITNET (Susan Currie)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Subject: Hand held scanners
Date: 18 Nov 92 23:36:51 GMT
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU

Here at Olin Library, Cornell University, we are looking into purchasing a hand
held scanner and software that would allow us to scan barcodes on materials
charged to study carrels and then download into Notis.  We have identified two
companies which manufacture hand held scanners and software but I wondered if
anyone who is a NOTIS circulation site has used any of these products? You may
respond me directly at sc6@cornellc.bitnet.  Thank you in advance.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:39:04 PST
From:         James Cruse <CN.NX8@STANFORD.BITNET>
Subject:      UPDATED......not

I need to some help figuring out how the various dates in a Patron
Record are actually used.  We've loaded all our faculty and staff into
NOTIS and are doing nightly s from Personnel.  I can't seem to see any
logic behind when the various UPDATED fields are used and when data
has actually been updated.

For example, my own record was originally created on 10/14/92.  I then
changed my address with Personnel about a month later.  In the morning
of Nov. 13 my record with the new address info was among those loaded.
When I examined the record later that morning, the Subrecord showed an
UPDATED date of 11/13/92.  My home address element had been changed
but rather than showing an UPDATED date, the VALID date changed from
10/14/92 to 11/13/92 and the UPDATED is "none."  Why was this not
considered an update?

I've got another case where the EXPIRES date in an ID element was
changed from "indef" to a specific date because Personnel sent us an
expires date when the person terminated.  Yet neither the UPDATED
field in the subrecord nor the full record were changed from "none" to
the date the new information was loaded?  Why aren't changes to the
date fields in a record considered to be updates to the record?

Also, I've made changed to address fields online and the UPDATED
fields in the addresses never change to reflect the date the changes
were input.

Anyone else experience this type of thing?  Is this something that
should function correctly.....or is it in the same category as some
other "features" that have never functioned properly?


Jim Cruse                          cn.jmc@stanford.bitnet
Assistant Chief                    cn.jmc@forsythe.stanford.edu
Access Services                    FAX:      (415) 725-6874
Stanford University Library        VOICE:    (415) 723-1491

To:  NOTIS-L(NOTIS-L@TCSVM)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Mon, 16 Nov 1992 12:00:09 EST
From:         Debbie Morrow <morrowd@GVSU.EDU>
Subject:      LSER report
Comments: To: notislaw@fatty.law.cornell.edu
Comments: cc: notis-l@tcsvm.bitnet

   Richard Hendricks' lengthy 3-part report, posted on the NOTIS law list,
   on what he learned at the NUGM conference workshop on LSER was
   magnificent and very welcome.  I attended the same workshop in June, but
   having someone else's perspective and evidence of the evolution of the
   workshop itself over the intervening months is quite valuable.  What
   would really help to solidify my thinking at this juncture, re: when and
   whether to recommend use of LSER at my site, would be a response to the
   report (rebuttal/confirmation, point by point) from any site(s) which
   have been implementing LSER already.  Any takers?

   Richard, thanks again for the excellent write-up and your thoughts.  I
   have copied this posting to NOTIS-L -- there may be broad enough interest
   in the topic of LSER to send your report there as well.

   Debbie Morrow

   Debbie Morrow / Automation Librarian/LIB1
   University Library / 108 JHZ
   Grand Valley State University / Allendale  MI   49401
   616/895-3581 / Internet: morrowd@gvsu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Texas A&M University Computing Services Center
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 10:17:52 CST
From:         Kim Reverman <KIM@TAMVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: OPAC Timeout and Storage Violations

On Tue, 17 Nov 1992 12:18:26 CST Jim Aagaard said:
>Has anyone else encountered this?  Is anyone else using the timeout
>without any problems?
>                              Jim Aagaard
>                              Northwestern University Library

We have LMS 5.0.2, MDAS 1.2.1 and CICS 2.1.1
We are also getting storage violations from the OPAC frequently and
sometimes this crashes CICS.  We have the timeout feature set.
I just checked my log of abends and noticed that I have not had a
storage violation since I put in a fix for an ASRA abend on the CL
command (probably just a coincidence).  By the way I have several
binders of storage violations, that I'm about to start examining.
Could you tell me what has triggered your hunch that the inactivity
timeout may be the problem?

                               Kim Reverman
                               TAMU Computing Services Center
                               kim@tamvm1.tamu.edu
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Organization: Southern Methodist University
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notis-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 10:39:20 CST
From:         Carolyn Kacena <VB7R1001@SMUVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: LOAN CODE
              20 Nov 1992 10:11:54 -0600 from <ZIMMRMAN@ACCDVM.ACCD.EDU>

Have you set up all valid loan codes in your LSYS?  In Section 5, no. 4
you should be able to view the loan codes understood by your local system.
If the one you want to use isn't there, then you would add it ...it
then should be possible to set up a specific circulation situation for
any combination of user/loan code/location as needed.

Carolyn Kacena
Director, Academic Support Automation
Fondren Library East 328
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX 75275-0135

(214) 692-3229             FAX: (214) 360-0609 or (214) 692-4138
Bitnet:   VB7R1001@SMUVM1
Internet: VB7R1001@vm.cis.smu.edu.
After 11/29:  (214)768-3229...
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU