HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: claire@chopin.udel.edu (Claire Elizab Barna)
Subject: Re: FEMINAZI'S...LET OPPRESS THEM TO THE POINT OF INSANITY!!!!
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 18:32:52 GMT

In article <1er4l3INNhv4@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> ttk@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (the troglodyte killer) writes:
>
>>What you're talking about is those annoying Feminazis!!!  These woMEN don't
>>want equality anymore...no, given the opportunity, these woMEN would turn our
>>democracy into a matriarchy!  Furthermore, these women buy into the liberals'
>>"Fourth Reich" Politically Correct movement, so of course you will be
>>censored!!!  Let's face it, if women want equality, that's fine.  But, if they
>>want domination...
>>   OPPRESS THEM EVEN MORE...MAKE 'EM CRACK UP...FEMINAZIS ARE BONA FIDE
>>                          BITCHES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 
>     Hey, some of us LIKE being dominated by women..  And I'm 
>MARRYING a bona fide bitch.  :-)  I wear the Gi in the family, but 
>she wears the .45 Desert Eagle..  It's a match made in heaven (or 
>perhaps in hell, but it's the kind of hell I like!).
> 
>     Lighten up, dude.  Nobody's oppressing you, and even if they 
>were, oppressing them back is no more morally just.
> 
>/---\ /---\ /=   /   ttk@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (the troglodyte killer)
>  =     =    = /    "Home is a place that keeps the rain off my computer"
>  =     =    = \     B0 f- t+ w- g k s- m+ r- p-(++)     ______
>  =     =    =   \                      silence = death   \bi/
>                                                           \/

ARTICULATELY PUT! EXCELLENT!

The Outed Feminist

Newsgroups: alt.politics.economics
From: starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu (Tim Starr)
Subject: Re: Keyenes VS Hayek
Organization: UDel, School of Life & Health Sciences
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 13:02:27 GMT

In article <1992Nov20.164853.5887@b30.ingr.com> craig@jido.b30.ingr.com writes:
}In article <1992Nov20.105710.845@genie.slhs.udel.edu> starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu (Tim Starr) writes:
}   In article <MDL.92Nov19114005@ak.cypress.com> mdl@cypress.com (Matt Landrum) writes:
}   }
}   }What is Hayek's solution to unemployment?
}
}   A market free enough to exclude even such well-entrenched interventions as
}   central banking so that stable currency could prevent business cycles.
}
}Aha! That's what I subscribed to this group for! Can you sketch the
}proof for the (intuitively appealing) proposition that "stable
}currency could prevent business cycles"?
}
}Thanks,
}
}-- Craig Presson <pressonc@ingr.com>
}  There is not a man in the country that can't make a living for himself and his
}  family.  But he can't make a living for them AND the government, too, the way
}  his government is living.  What the government has got to do is live as cheap
}  as the people.					    -- Will Rogers

I'll sure try, Craig.  The austrian theory of business cycles, for which
Hayek got the Nobel Prize in 1974, as I understand it, is that booms are
caused by an expansion of credit, which fools borrowers into thinking that
the low interest rates mean that the time-value of money has actually lowered.
They then borrow and malinvest in projects that are too long-term than what
will clear the market.  Busts come when this is realized, and the malinvestment
must be liquidated.

Hope this helps.

Tim Starr - Renaissance Now! - Think Universally, Act Selfishly
starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu

"True greatness consists in the use of a powerful understanding to enlighten
oneself and others." - Voltaire
From: crpresto@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu (Charlie Preston)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.economics
Subject: Re: Keyenes VS Hayek
Date: 20 Nov 92 03:02:10 GMT
Organization: Illinois State University

In article <MDL.92Nov19114005@ak.cypress.com> mdl@cypress.com (Matt Landrum) writes:
>
>What would Keyenes say about the US debt?
>
I believe he said 'In the long run we're all dead.'


-- 
Chas                         DoD #7769

"Oh, how can you be in two places at once when you're not anywhere at all?"
Newsgroups: alt.politics.economics
Subject: Re: Help for U.S. history????
From: smonge@zeus.calpoly.edu (-SURGE!-)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 04:44:30 GMT
Organization: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

In article <1ek4tvINN3oh@gaia.ucs.orst.edu> jiangh@ucs.orst.edu (Jiang Hao) writes:
>
>hi, could anyone tell me 5 things about each of those following statement?
>1.worldly affairs. 2.art.. etc. 3.government,war,politics.4.OREGON.5.women. 
>6.sports.7.technology,industry.(I like to know the things happened in U.S. and
>is between 1787-1850)
>thanks for the help!!!!
>dj
> 
>

If you can get a hold of the Volume Library(tm) set of reference books
its got some great comparative history stuff in volume two and three.
Three big blue books...

---
smonge@athena
From: sstover@sumax.seattleu.edu (   Kate   )
Newsgroups: alt.politics.economics
Subject: Re: Keyenes VS Hayek
Date: 20 Nov 92 20:38:58 GMT
Organization: Seattle University

In article <1992Nov19.224229.19093@b30.ingr.com> craig@jido.b30.ingr.com writes:
>In article <MDL.92Nov19114005@ak.cypress.com> mdl@cypress.com (Matt Landrum) writes:
>["Austrian" view of US debt?]
>Dunno. Size of von Mises and Hayek's substantive books has kept me
>ignorant to date (what? this isn't alt.true-confessions?)
>
>   What would Keyenes say about the US debt?
>
>Keynes plainly recommended _temporary_ increases in government
>spending to prime the economic pump during severe slumps. Although his
>theory is often cited to justify all kinds of tinkering with the
>economy, I'm pretty sure he's been misrepresented on this particular
>point.

Most definitely -- Keynesian economics *does* advocate, even requires,
temporary deficit spending.  Especially in an economy like ours, which
Keynes may or may not have been able to anticipate, this is necessary
because so much money is based on the value of non-material goods and must
be represented elsewhere.  The use of deficit spending is integral to that
sort of money system.

Unfortunately, Reaganomics took this a step farther in much the same way
that the owner of a new credit card might go overboard--deciding that the
*ability* to spend on a deficit, and the occasional *necessity* to spend
on a deficit, gave license to unlimited deficit spending.



-- 
       Sheryl Stover  %  If you ask me what I have come to do in the world,
  & Hemingway & Clio  %  I who am an artist, I will reply: "I am here to
sstover@seattleu.edu  %  live aloud."                    -Emile Zola
Newsgroups: alt.politics.economics
From: bmarcum@world.std.com (Bill Marcum)
Subject: Re: Help for U.S. history????
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 02:16:16 GMT

In article <1ek4tvINN3oh@gaia.ucs.orst.edu> jiangh@ucs.orst.edu (Jiang Hao) writes:
>
>hi, could anyone tell me 5 things about each of those following statement?
To begin with, these aren't statements.  A statement is a complete sentence,
but I'll give it a shot anyway.  I'll limit myself to one reply on each
subject, but I bet you have hundreds by the time your homework is due.
>1.worldly affairs. 
I haven't had a good worldly affair in months.
>2.art.. etc.
Great guy.  Plays a mean piano.
> 3.government,war,politics.
Can't have one without the others.  Wouldn't it be great if we could do away
with all three?
>4.OREGON.
I'm not gay, but I wouldn't want to live in a state with so much intolerance,
even though I do have friends there thanks to the net.
>5.women. 
Why do you only ask about women, and not men?
>6.sports.
Never cared much for them myself, though I did play in the pep band in high
school and college.  It was the social atmosphere I liked more than the games
themselves.
7.technology,industry.(I like to know the things happened in U.S. and
>is between 1787-1850)
Sorry, I'm not THAT old, though some mornings I feel like it.
>thanks for the help!!!!
>dj
> 
>


Newsgroups: alt.politics.economics
From: craig@jido.b30.ingr.com (Craig Presson)
Subject: Re: Keyenes VS Hayek
Reply-To: craig@jido.b30.ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, Alabama
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 22:42:29 GMT

In article <MDL.92Nov19114005@ak.cypress.com> mdl@cypress.com (Matt Landrum) writes:
["Austrian" view of US debt?]
Dunno. Size of von Mises and Hayek's substantive books has kept me
ignorant to date (what? this isn't alt.true-confessions?)

   What would Keyenes say about the US debt?

Keynes plainly recommended _temporary_ increases in government
spending to prime the economic pump during severe slumps. Although his
theory is often cited to justify all kinds of tinkering with the
economy, I'm pretty sure he's been misrepresented on this particular
point.

The public debt has for a long time (at least since Hamilton) been
seen as a "money reservoir" that could be used to fuel growth, and
periodically recapitalized. The current situation makes it clear that
the reservoir can become too large.

-- Craig Presson
Not an economist, but I'd like to learn to play one on the Net.
Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago
Date: Friday, 20 Nov 1992 16:56:12 CST
From: <U23590@uicvm.uic.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.economics
Subject: Re: Keyenes VS Hayek
 <1992Nov20.105710.845@genie.slhs.udel.edu>
 <1992Nov20.164853.5887@b30.ingr.com>

Business cycles occur because of malinvestment.

Busniess cycles are when businesses fail, not in one particular market
segment, but throughout the economy, and not bacause of a natural
disaster of any sort, but beacuse of human factors.  For there to be
a _general_ failure of businesses, there must have been a _general_
incentive to invest in propositions which were not feasible.

When the government causes a credit expansion by expanding the money
supply, it artificially creates an incentive to extend the extra
credit to businesses which do not satisfy the wants of consumers.
This is malinvestment.  At first, it makes the economy look very robust.
Eventually, however, the expansion's problems come home to roost--those
businesses fail because they were not viable and cannot continue to
borrow money forever.

This is _not_ the only way the economy can get into doldrums.
The regulatory expansion of the Bush presidency, for example,
could easily create a long-term slowing of growth or production
itself, but it has no periodic charachter.

Recessions are caused by government's typical short-sightedness
usually manifested in politicians trying to please citizens with
an illusory expanding economy.

-watkins@earth.eecs.uic.edu (respond only to this address)
Xref: sparky alt.politics.reform:65 alt.politics.usa.misc:609 alt.activism:19087
From: Clinton-HQ@Campaign92.Org (Clinton/Gore '92)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.usa.misc,alt.activism
Subject: CLINTON: Statement on the Death of President Bush's mother.
Date: 21 Nov 1992 20:21:58 -0500
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: life.ai.mit.edu


 Office of the President-Elect



 For Immediate Release:
 November 19, 1992

 Statement of the President-Elect

      I am saddened by the death today of President Bush's mother,
 Dorothy Walker Bush.  She was a remarkable woman, whom Hillary,
 Chelsea and I had the good fortune to meet in Maine several years
 ago. Throughout his life, President Bush has put his family first.

      I know it is a difficult day for the President and Mrs. Bush.
 Late this afternoon, I called President Bush to express our
 concerns.  Hillary and I offered our condolences and tonight, they
 are in our thoughts and prayers.

                               -30-30-30-

 Atkins Building
 105 W. Capitol Street, Suite 400
 Little Rock, Arkansas  72201
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Subject: Re: CLINTON: Statement on the Death of President Bush's mother.
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:47:25 GMT

In article <23NOV199209422445@ucis.vill.edu> 185422285@ucis.vill.edu (Alec D. Plotkin) writes:
>In article <1emnbmINNgdi@life.ai.mit.edu>, Clinton-HQ@Campaign92.Org (Clinton/Gore '92) writes...
>>
>> Office of the President-Elect
>>
>>
>>
>> For Immediate Release:
>> November 19, 1992
>>
>> Statement of the President-Elect
>>
>>      I am saddened by the death today of President Bush's mother,
>> Dorothy Walker Bush.  She was a remarkable woman, whom Hillary,
>> Chelsea and I had the good fortune to meet in Maine several years
>> ago. Throughout his life, President Bush has put his family first.
>>
>>      I know it is a difficult day for the President and Mrs. Bush.
>> Late this afternoon, I called President Bush to express our
>> concerns.  Hillary and I offered our condolences and tonight, they
>> are in our thoughts and prayers.
>>
>>                               -30-30-30-
>>
>> Atkins Building
>> 105 W. Capitol Street, Suite 400
>> Little Rock, Arkansas  72201
>
>
>George is having a very bad month. Oh well, he deserves it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That was uncalled for.
Xref: sparky alt.politics.reform:66 alt.politics.usa.misc:611 alt.activism:19116
From: 185422285@ucis.vill.edu (Alec D. Plotkin)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.reform,alt.politics.usa.misc,alt.activism
Subject: Re: CLINTON: Statement on the Death of President Bush's mother.
Date: 23 Nov 92 14:42:00 GMT
Organization: Villanova University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1

In article <1emnbmINNgdi@life.ai.mit.edu>, Clinton-HQ@Campaign92.Org (Clinton/Gore '92) writes...
> 
> Office of the President-Elect
> 
> 
> 
> For Immediate Release:
> November 19, 1992
> 
> Statement of the President-Elect
> 
>      I am saddened by the death today of President Bush's mother,
> Dorothy Walker Bush.  She was a remarkable woman, whom Hillary,
> Chelsea and I had the good fortune to meet in Maine several years
> ago. Throughout his life, President Bush has put his family first.
> 
>      I know it is a difficult day for the President and Mrs. Bush.
> Late this afternoon, I called President Bush to express our
> concerns.  Hillary and I offered our condolences and tonight, they
> are in our thoughts and prayers.
> 
>                               -30-30-30-
> 
> Atkins Building
> 105 W. Capitol Street, Suite 400
> Little Rock, Arkansas  72201


George is having a very bad month. Oh well, he deserves it.
Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex
From: drw@euclid.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
Subject: Survey
Organization: MIT Dept. of Tetrapilotomy, Cambridge, MA, USA
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:39:26 GMT

(I'm not sure whether this will help the survey-taker, since I missed
the survey request, but it should be good grist for this newsgroup.)

>White Males,
>Currently enrolled in ANY College or University
 
Sorry, graduated.
 
>Q1. Are you from a rural area ( 2500 or less pop ) or a city ?
 
From a town of 10,000 in a rural area.
 
>Q2. Do you believe women in the military should serve in combat
> roles ?
 
Yes.  Not only should they be allowed to, but if the draft is
reinstated, they should be required to.  If we're going to have
equality (IMHO, a good thing), the burdens should be shared equally
with the benefits.

Dale
Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex
From: an284@anon.penet.fi
Subject: --No subject--
Organization: Anonymous contact service
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 03:28:08 GMT

Marilyn Monroe (Norma Jean) and JFK

I have heard rumors that Marilyn and JFK had a secret
affair, and that their breakup contributed to Marilyn's
subsequent suicide.  Is there any conclusive evidence
about either of these issues?

Lalu
--
To use this service, send mail to:
Anonymous posting:	<name.of.news.group>@anon.penet.fi
Anonymous mail:		<user's alias>@anon.penet.fi
			<user%host>@anon.penet.fi
Test path/get alias:	ping@anon.penet.fi
Assign nickname:	nick@anon.penet.fi	(in Subject:)
Anon administrator:	an0@anon.penet.fi	(anonymously)
			admin@anon.penet.fi	(non-anon)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex
From: claire@chopin.udel.edu (Claire Elizab Barna)
Subject: Re: FEMINAZI'S...LET OPPRESS THEM TO THE POINT OF INSANITY!!!!
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 17:49:26 GMT

In article <1992Nov22.233538.1@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu> cvafy006@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov23.051349.1130@nevada.edu>, thealien@nevada.edu (Minstrel Alien) writes:
>> 	Call me clueless.  Call me unclear on the concept.
>> 
>> 		Call me male, if you want.
>> (AUTHOR'S NOTE:I gave up on this whole personal gender thing a long time ago.)
>> 
>> 	"By the way I am a woman not a lady"
>> 
>> This babble over terms has always confused me.  I don't think anyone thought 
>> you were a female of noble standing(O'Course, that's Lady, not lady).
>> 	
>> 	I also doubt anyone meant you were of exceedingly high manners and 
>> refinement...I mean, your posts explain that.  
>> 
>> 	Therefore, he must have been using the term as an interchange for 
>> woman(it's much shorter to type, you see).
>> 
>> 		Does anyone else out there think that femin*'s would get more 
>> respect if they didn't constantly pounce on insignificant details in 
>> conversation?  I know that makes me want to leave...Especially when I'm told 
>> that I meant something I didn't. I rather think I'm the judge of that.
>> 
>> 
>> 	Post all flames/manifestos/prices to be laid on my head here
>> 				or
>> 		Mail me.  thealien@magic.cs.unlv.edu
>> 			  thealien@redrock.nevada.edu
>> 			  
>> Minstrel Alien(Bloodroot|Sean McCarthy|The Alien[DZ89])
>
>What you're talking about is those annoying Feminazis!!!  These woMEN don't
>want equality anymore...no, given the opportunity, these woMEN would turn our
>democracy into a matriarchy!  Furthermore, these women buy into the liberals'
>"Fourth Reich" Politically Correct movement, so of course you will be
>censored!!!  Let's face it, if women want equality, that's fine.  But, if they
>want domination...
>
>   OPPRESS THEM EVEN MORE...MAKE 'EM CRACK UP...FEMINAZIS ARE BONA FIDE
>                          BITCHES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think you meant, "turn our PATRIARCHY into a matriarchy".  I agree, it
would be much better if we all followed Marilyn Quayle and all became
housewives and stayed home with the kids. NOT!  By the way when she was out
campaigning who was at home with her kids?
Please do not equate feminism with nazism. We only want equal treatment,
but in order to share, men must be willing to lose some power.  Don't feel
frightened. It will be okay, I promise. See Arnold Kahn's article on
"Power & the Sexes".

      MISOGYNISTS ARE BONA FIDE REPRESSORS OF INADEQUACIES!!!!!!!

FEEL A LITTLE THREATENED, DO WE?

AN OUTED FEMINIST
Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex
Subject: FEMINAZI'S...LET OPPRESS THEM TO THE POINT OF INSANITY!!!!
From: cvafy006@vmsb.is.csupomona.edu
Date: 22 Nov 92 23:35:38 PST
Organization: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Nntp-Posting-User: cvafy006

In article <1992Nov23.051349.1130@nevada.edu>, thealien@nevada.edu (Minstrel Alien) writes:
> 	Call me clueless.  Call me unclear on the concept.
> 
> 		Call me male, if you want.
> (AUTHOR'S NOTE:I gave up on this whole personal gender thing a long time ago.)
> 
> 	"By the way I am a woman not a lady"
> 
> This babble over terms has always confused me.  I don't think anyone thought 
> you were a female of noble standing(O'Course, that's Lady, not lady).
> 	
> 	I also doubt anyone meant you were of exceedingly high manners and 
> refinement...I mean, your posts explain that.  
> 
> 	Therefore, he must have been using the term as an interchange for 
> woman(it's much shorter to type, you see).
> 
> 		Does anyone else out there think that femin*'s would get more 
> respect if they didn't constantly pounce on insignificant details in 
> conversation?  I know that makes me want to leave...Especially when I'm told 
> that I meant something I didn't. I rather think I'm the judge of that.
> 
> 
> 	Post all flames/manifestos/prices to be laid on my head here
> 				or
> 		Mail me.  thealien@magic.cs.unlv.edu
> 			  thealien@redrock.nevada.edu
> 			  
> Minstrel Alien(Bloodroot|Sean McCarthy|The Alien[DZ89])

What you're talking about is those annoying Feminazis!!!  These woMEN don't
want equality anymore...no, given the opportunity, these woMEN would turn our
democracy into a matriarchy!  Furthermore, these women buy into the liberals'
"Fourth Reich" Politically Correct movement, so of course you will be
censored!!!  Let's face it, if women want equality, that's fine.  But, if they
want domination...

   OPPRESS THEM EVEN MORE...MAKE 'EM CRACK UP...FEMINAZIS ARE BONA FIDE
                          BITCHES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex
From: sro@media.mit.edu (Shawn O'Donnell)
Subject: Re: SURVEY HELP PLEASE
Organization: M.I.T. Media Laboratory
	<1992Nov18.170748.20922@dg-rtp.dg.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 09:35:41 GMT

>  Q1. 
       No.
>  Q2.

  The real problem is not that we don't allow our young women to go
into combat; it's that we let anyone go into combat.

Otherwise, skills, not sex, should determine who should fight.
From: ttk@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (the troglodyte killer)
Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex
Subject: Re: FEMINAZI'S...LET OPPRESS THEM TO THE POINT OF INSANITY!!!!
Date: 23 Nov 92 17:33:23 GMT
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucscb.ucsc.edu


>What you're talking about is those annoying Feminazis!!!  These woMEN don't
>want equality anymore...no, given the opportunity, these woMEN would turn our
>democracy into a matriarchy!  Furthermore, these women buy into the liberals'
>"Fourth Reich" Politically Correct movement, so of course you will be
>censored!!!  Let's face it, if women want equality, that's fine.  But, if they
>want domination...
>   OPPRESS THEM EVEN MORE...MAKE 'EM CRACK UP...FEMINAZIS ARE BONA FIDE
>                          BITCHES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
     Hey, some of us LIKE being dominated by women..  And I'm 
MARRYING a bona fide bitch.  :-)  I wear the Gi in the family, but 
she wears the .45 Desert Eagle..  It's a match made in heaven (or 
perhaps in hell, but it's the kind of hell I like!).
 
     Lighten up, dude.  Nobody's oppressing you, and even if they 
were, oppressing them back is no more morally just.
 
/---\ /---\ /=   /   ttk@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (the troglodyte killer)
  =     =    = /    "Home is a place that keeps the rain off my computer"
  =     =    = \     B0 f- t+ w- g k s- m+ r- p-(++)     ______
  =     =    =   \                      silence = death   \bi/
                                                           \/
Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex
From: bedford@asterix.gaul.csd.uwo.ca (Darryl Bedford)
Subject: Re: this newsgroup
Reply-To: bedford@asterix.gaul.csd.uwo.ca (Darryl Bedford)
Organization: University of Western Ontario
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 19:34:44 GMT

In article <13568@coxm>, coxm@Software.Mitel.COM (Michael Cox) writes:
|> Hey, I thought this newsgroup was supposed to be about sex in politics (or was
|> it the politics of sex -- no that would be rec.sex.politics) with the likes
|> of Peter North (no relation to Oliver),  or some of the great British Sex
|> scandals, or even Gary Hart (for all you U.S. political junkies).  We might
|> even expand to include alt.sex.monarchy type topics (but then this newsgroup
|> should be changed to alt.sex.scandals).
|> -- 

Didn't the complainant herself in the Peter North
case say that no sex was involved?

Maybe that's why she complained...
(Just kidding.)

Anyone have an actual news story lying around that
they can post?


|> Michael H. Cox      | The end of the Earth is expected in 2.3 billion years.
|>                     | Have you made the correct investment decisions?
|> Mitel Corporation   | 
Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex
From: thealien@nevada.edu (Minstrel Alien)
Subject: Re: FEMINAZI'S...LET OPPRESS THEM TO THE POINT OF INSANITY!!!!
Organization: The Danger Zone
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 11:41:08 GMT

	Ah, er, um...I refuse to use that term in public, that's why I said

		Femin*
Could be feminists, feminazis, feminal artery blockages...

	Just draw your own opinion...But not your gun!

Sean McCarthy/Minstrel Alien

Newsgroups: alt.politics.sex