HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: psilva@techbook.com (Paul Silva)
Subject: Cunningham's QB rating (Was: Re: Eagles : YIKES!)
Organization: TECHbooks of Beaverton Oregon - Public Access Unix
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 06:50:46 GMT


In article <1992Oct7.091801.664@totaltec.com> mark@totaltec.com writes:

>back (44 Rathman) was wide open 10 yards down the field. In case you haven't
>noticed Randall is the top rated passer in the NFL, ahead of the AlMighty
>Young. Why don't you get a real perspective on what you are talking about
>before you post trash like that.
>Mark Remeta

  Here's my perspective:

  Look for Cunningham's league leading rating to take a beating over the
  next several weeks as the Eagles face some tougher defenses.  I doubt
  his rating will be above 85 at the end of the year.  Young will soon pass 
  him and remain at or near the top of the QB ratings list for the remainder
  of the season.  With the Eagles playing KC, and SF playing NE tomorrow,
  it may happen even faster.  :-)

  ...Paul
From: vaps0de@prism.gatech.EDU (Dustin Emhart)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: KC-Phil game:rule question
Date: 13 Oct 92 05:39:51 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology

In <ldj2klINNg69@cronkite> andy@misha.Central.Sun.COM (Andy Knipp SE Andersen) writes:

>Why they did not through a flag could be because the 
>ref didn't think it was a clip,  or it since there was no 

How could it "not be a clip" if there was no runback? A clip is a clip is a
clip. (Can you say "defensive clipping"? It's a foul.) You're probably right
the first time: the ref probably ruled it wasn't a clip (i.e. contact was
initiated from the front).
-- 
Dustin Emhart                       |  CS Majors: We do more after 11 pm than
Georgia Institute of Technology     |  most people do all day.
Internet: vaps0de@prism.gatech.edu  |        -- me
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject:  Highest Score in NFL history- WRONG!!!!!!!
Originator: delarocq@c00080-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 04:29:32 GMT





  The highest number of points ever scored by one team in the NFL:



  1940:  Chicago Bears 75,  Washington Redskins 0.


 
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
   BBB   U  U  FFFF  FFFF  AAA   L   OOO     BBB    I  L     L   SSS     !
  B   B U  U  F     F     A  A  L   O   O   B   B  I  L     L   S   S   !
 BBBBB U  U  FFFF  FFFF  AAAA  L   O   O   BBBBB  I  L     L     SS    !
B   B U  U  F     F     A  A  L   O   O   B   B  I  L     L    S   S  
 BBB   UU  F     F     A  A  LLLL  OOO     BBB  I  LLLL  LLLL   SSS  !

Raiders Fans: Prepare to Lose!

Reporter: "Who do you think is the best running back in the NFL?"
Thurman Thomas: "The running back that went to Oklahoma State".
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: WHAT DID I SAY....EAGLES 16-0 (SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS)
Organization: University of Michigan
	<BILLMS.92Oct7082934@quip.eecs.umich.edu>
	<1992Oct12.130905.1659@nntpserver.chevron.com>
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 15:05:43 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.130905.1659@nntpserver.chevron.com> hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde) writes:

   In article <BILLMS.92Oct7082934@quip.eecs.umich.edu> billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
   >In article <1992Oct6.221644.7890@nntpserver.chevron.com> hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde) writes:
   >
   >   I'll say!  It'll be a dead issue after their loss this Sunday.  Everyone
			     ^^^^^^^^^^
   >   seems to think Philly will have a cake walk in KC.  Why is that?
   >
   >Because most people think Philly is much better than KC.
   >
   >Bill
   >--
   >-------------------------------
   >	Bill Mangione-Smith
   >	billms@eecs.umich.edu

   Mighty Chiefs   	24
   Scalped, bald Eagles	17	(and, as someone said regarding the
				   Eagles and Saints in week 1, IT WASN'T 
				   AS CLOSE AS THE SCORE INDICATED!)


Two comments: 

1) 	I never said that *I* thought Philly was better, just most people.

2)	Three bombs to win by 7 on your home field probably isn't going to
win over "most people", though it was impressive.  And fun to watch, as a fan
of both teams.

Bill

--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
From: davem@uvmark.uucp (Dave Meeks)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagle Feces
Date: 14 Oct 92 17:33:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: uvmark.1992Oct14.173318.58926
Organization: Vmark Software, Inc.

In article <Bw2vx4.CGE@ns1.nodak.edu> sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan ) writes:
>
>
>
>
>To Dough the Dolfan.....
>
>I agree that the Vikings choked in 4 Super Bowls, but so
>also will the Dolphins, if at all they make it to the
>SB, this year.
>
>U will be also here on Jan 26 1993 and so will I and we
>will see. 
>
>The Dolphins will win the SB..... NOT!!!!!!!!!!
>The Dolphins are good but the NFC-East is better. 
>Whether u like it or not facts are facts.
>S.H

And just what are those "facts"???  Miami is currently 2-0 against the 
NFC this year.  They mighty Eagles lost to the KC.  The Bills beat the
Mighty 49ers..

Oh, I guess the fact that the Pats and other of the weakest AFC losing to
teams like the 49ers and such is your "facts", right???

Well, so far, it seems the the top AFC teams are doing very well for 
themselves...
-- 
David T. Meeks                    ||" We are jigsaw pieces, aligned on the 
VMark Software, Inc.              ||  perimeter edge, 
uvmark!davem@merk.com             ||  interlocked through a missing piece"
davem%uvmark@merk.com             ||" ...This world is totally Fugazi"
From: sortland@soda.berkeley.edu (Stefan Sortland)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Redskins Blow out Eagles!!!!!
Date: 15 Oct 1992 06:20:33 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley, CS Undergraduate Association
NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu


	Before we call Next Sundays game over, remember. 



	Jim Lachey will be out 4 weeks (minimum)! (sigh...

Stefan
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Bob Marshall)
Subject: Re: Request: Highest Score in NFL history
Reply-To: marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale, California
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 92 00:36:43 GMT

In article <1565@niktow.canisius.edu>, bittle@niktow.canisius.edu (Jason Bittle) writes:
>And, I remember that Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets either beat or got beat by
>the score of 222-(something infinitely small)..

It was 222-0, against Cumberland. The story I heard is that Cumberland 
punted the ball on first down on every possession.

=============================================================================
Bob Marshall                     \\     "It ain't age
Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.     \\     That makes me look this way
Sunnyvale, CA                      \\    It ain't the years, boys,
marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com\\   It's the miles"
"I tell the truth 'cept when I lie"  \\     - Chris LeDoux
=============================================================================
From: curtis@mpd.tandem.com (Curtis Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bermanisms
Keywords: Drury, Jewry
Date: 9 Oct 92 18:38:41 GMT
Organization: Tandem Computers, Inc.


In article <4599@equinox.unr.edu>, schnell@pyramid.unr.edu ( Dan Schnell
) writes:
> 
> Berman has one that I don't understand. 
> 
> Tampa Bay (I think) reciever 
> 
> Willie "Soviet" Drury
> 
> It just doesn't "click"...
> 
> Dan Schnell
> Still a Chargers Fan.
> Hey, they might be in third place after week 6!

In recent years, there has been a movement to assist Jews in the
Soviet Union to move from that country to Israel.  The movement
spoke of these people collectively as Soviet Jewry.

That's Berman's reference.

As a further note, remember Emily Latella (Gilda Radner)
on Saturday Night Live.  She would take an issue of the day,
mispronounce it, and rant and rave about it until corrected,
when she'd then say "Never Miiiind!".

One of her ravings was on why should we try to help
"Save the Soviet Jewelry"


OB Football:
In a few weeks, both the Cowboys (vs KC in Dallas) and Oilers (at Denver ?)
play at the same time on NBC.  Austin (Cowboy training camp home) TV viewers
voted to watch the Oilers.  San Antonio (Oilers training camp home) will
show the Cowboys (not sure if they held a vote).  Go figure.

-Curtis
From: icsu0182@cs.montana.edu (Sean)
Subject: Re: Two Different Games Eagles/Cowboys
Organization: Montana State University, Dept. of Computer Science, Bozeman MT 59717
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:48:46 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.154815@IASTATE.EDU> rwturner@IASTATE.EDU (Richard W Turner) writes:
>In article <1992Oct7.201456.22710@csc.ti.com>, rscott@ra.csc.ti.com (Roderick
>Scott) writes:
>> It's Amazing How Fans For The Cowboys, And Fans For The Eagles Saw Two
>> Games In One...
>> 
>> Cowboys Fans States:
>> They Beat Themselves ...
>> 
>> Eagles Fans States:
>> It Was The Defense That Caused Them To Be Themselves..
>> 
>> Let's Hear From Some Non-Cowboys/Eagles Fans On Which Game They Saw..
>>
> 
>The Eagle defensive pressure caused the offensive
>problems for the cowboys. No doubt about it.
>
>> This Should Settle The Argument....
>
>   I doubt it, the cowboy diehards will still disagree.
>   And that's OK. 
>
>Richard Turner
>DOLFAN

Well, just for the record, I am a diehard Cowboys fan...AND...to your 
surprise I am sure, I will be the first to admit that the Cowboys did
lose to the Eagles by their own doing, not through anything else.
A LOT of it was the defensive pressure of the Eagles,especially the front 4.
The Eagles did an excellent job of stuffing everything that the Cowboys
tried to do offensively...HOWEVER, I also saw two games, the first half,
and the second half.  They were like two totally different games, at 
least for the Cowboys anyhow.  The Eagles played with the same intensity  
and concetration the entire game.  Very imperessive showing by the Eagles.
But on the other hand, the Cowboys stayed right with them until the second
half, and then it was like the Cowboys were a totally different team.  They
turned the ball over with the help of the Eagle defense, and no one, I don't
give a rats ass who they are, turns the ball over that many times and 
climbs out of a whole like that against the Eagles defense.  The Pokes
showed that they can play with the Eagles for a half...Now all they need
to do is to play a full game.  That could be easier said than done.  The 
Crowd had a lot to do with it, and the penalties and the turnovers took 
the Cowboys out of the game even deeper...ALL BY THEMSELVES.  I still
look for hope, but the game in Texas Stadium will be better by far, and
that is a promise...

Sean


-- 
  =========================================================================
     Sean Reid                  ||   "F...You're a gimp." 
     Dept. of Computer Science  ||                 - Wayne Campbell 
     Montana State University   ||  **** GO COWBOYS!!!!!!! ****           
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: u130557@cc.tut.fi (Uusitalo Kari)
Subject: C. Duncan
Organization: Tampere University of Technology, Finland
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 13:18:01 GMT




    Hi!

 Would somebody please email me the last season
stats of Curtis Duncan? I need both receiving
and rushing stats.
I am especially interested in that how many times
he run with the ball & what was his rushing average.

   Thank you very much!

   Kari
   u130557@cc.tut.fi
From: mk0e@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MAHEENDRA BABURAO KASMALKAR)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dallas Philly NFC championship game?
Date: 9 Oct 92 00:10:19 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1992Oct7.224703.1@vaxb.acs.unt.edu>, asif@vaxb.acs.unt.edu writes:
>Dallas Philly in NFC championship game?
>What do u think?
>
I think 9ers-Philly. 9ers should get the home field advantage till the
Championship game. Philly and Dallas are in the toughest division and are
bound to drop some games. 9ers on the other hand have a relatively easy
schedule.
9ers are hosting Philly sometime in November. Now that would be a good game.

Maheendra


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
!  My life in US :            !      Maheendra Kasmalkar         !
!                             !      mk0e@lehigh.edu             !
!  Apartment , Department     !      mk0e@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu      !
!  Advisor and Budweiser      !      (215)-758-8081              !
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: chris@lightnin.Columbia.NCR.COM
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagle Feces
Date: 15 Oct 92 17:51:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: ncrcae.1992Oct15.175120.3933
Organization: NCR Corp, E&M-Columbia, Columbia, SC

In article <1992Oct15.100504.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu> cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes:
>>>
>>>To Dough the Dolfan.....
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Hey! Get it right Siv. It's dough THE Dolfan!
>>                                       ^
>> Tony (go new england) Travaglini
>> tech@cs.ucf.edu
>> 
>
>      No, no, no. If your gonna woof, than woof with smarts. This is
>how it should have been written:
>
>                                  dough THE dolfan
>                                            ^
>                         -doug THE dolfan-
     
Is dough pronounced "duff" or "doe"?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: Miami Dolphins
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 20:07:29 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <1992Oct8.162506.18073@ntmtv>, weitzeka@ntmtv.UUCP (Keith Weitzel) writes:
> In article <Bvs8u8.JxI@acsu.buffalo.edu> v130pwbq@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (ANTI-CHRIST) writes:
>>Here is the Miami Dolphin schedule. Along side each game a have placed a number.
>>1 - should have no problem winning, 2 - should win/could be close,
>>D 14 LA Raiders       (1) 
> 
>    The Raiders on Monday night and Miami is going to win with no
> problems? I don't think so.  The Raiders have the Dolphins number.
> I cannot remember when the last time that the Dolphins beat the
> Raiders in regular season.  The Raiders are always tough on
> Monday night.  Hopefully, the Dolphins will do as you and look
> past the Raiders, then the Raiders will go to Maimi and crush
> the unexpecting Dolphans.
> 
> A die hard Raider fan
> I bleed silver and black

             You are exactly right. The Raiders are one of the few teams
that always beat Miami. I think the Raiders winning percentage against the
Dolphins is well above 80. I'm still praying that the dolphins take each
game one at a time. If they do that, 14-2 and home field advantage would
certainly help them get back to the promised land.

                               -doug THE dolfan-
From: heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: HAIL THE BROWNS
Date: 13 Oct 92 19:58:39 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center

In article <dn2001-131092152526@m248-103.bgsu.edu>, dn2001@andy.bgsu.edu (Dan Nolan) writes...

>THE BROWNS RULE!!!!!!!!!!
> 
>THAT'S ALL AND NOTHING ELSE.
> 
>GREENBAY DOESN'T STAND A CHANCE AGAINST US.

Green Bay is 2 words.

JGH
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith)
Subject: Re: Eagles : YIKES!
Organization: Univ. of North Carolina @ Wilmington
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 23:54:31 GMT

jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:

much mindless drivel from Mr. Gloria deleted...

>                                 ... What I am simply attempting to
>point out to you boneheads, regardless of what the Eagles are doing 
>(or ANY team for that matter), this early in the season, is not a 
>prelude to what the final standings will be (remember the wildcard
>Raiders, winning it all?). What part of these don't you understand?  
>  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	

    You seem to have a problem with being totally misinformed (or is
it just your ego that proclaims your opinions to be facts?). Maybe
you should check you facts before making such asinine statements.

    This is the most pathetic argument you have yet proposed. The Raiders
were one hell of a good team in 1980 (11-5) and would have WON the AFC
West outright from the 11-5 Chargers if it hadnt been for the fact that
the Eagles beat the Raiders 10-7 late in the season (the Eagles also
LOST to the Chargers that year, one of only 4 losses) at Oakland.

    This shows that the two teams were very evenly matched, and thus
both could be considered the cream of the NFL. And also remember that the
Raiders beat the Chargers in the AFC Championship game that year. All
the Raiders proved by beating the Eagles in the Super Bowl was that
the two teams were evenly matched after all.
-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
|rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu           Ross Smith              smith@oscar.udel.edu|
|    "I really hate that dog...." - Dr. Chase Matthews, Pet Semetary 2       |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: august@hlpdsk.jsc.nasa.gov (Ray August)
Subject: Re: Houston Oilers Wk6
Organization: nasa-jsc
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 12:40:57 GMT

: INJURIES
: Munchak ?

Really? I need to check out Houston news tonight; without Mike we won't
win next Sunday.......damn.

--

The rayster             ** Go Oilers
                        ** Go Braves
                        ** Bulls in 93

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: langrock@rice.edu (David Jeffrey Langrock)
Subject: Re:Dave Krieg (was Hats off to the Chiefs!)
Originator: langrock@tone.cs.rice.edu
Reply-To: langrock@rice.edu (David Jeffrey Langrock)
Organization: Rice University
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 17:06:23 GMT


In article <1992Oct12.123345.15091@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, pws2n@vision1.ee.Virginia.EDU (Philip Weaver Smith) writes:

|> I think the only if KC faces is whether Kreig can play that well
|> consistently.  That was the boon of the annually 8-8 Seahawks
|> under his command.  As a former Seahawk watcher, this was the
|> best game Krieg has played in A LONG TIME!!!  

Seahawks:  The Krieg/Knox years (1983-1991)

Year  Record  Playoffs
1983     9-7      2-1
1984    12-4      1-1
1985     8-8
1986    10-6            (one victory from playoffs)
1987     9-6      0-1
1988     9-7      0-1

Subtot. 57-38     3-4
         (60%)

1989     7-9
1990     9-7            (one victory from playoffs)
1991     7-9            (one victory from playoffs)

Totals  80-63     3-4
         (56%)

Notice that when the Seahawks had talent around Krieg, they were hardly just "annually 8-8".  And the minute Krieg/Knox leave, the Seahawks are arguably THE WORST TEAM IN PRO FOOTBALL.  Maybe there was something to that Division III quarterback from Wisconsin. 

I know Krieg is known for his "inconsistency", but I believe this is due to the
fact that he is just a better than average quarterback who racks up consistently good statistics by playing the percentages.  True, he occasionally wears
a big "S" on his chest and fools fans into thinking he is something more.  People
look at his lifetime QB ratings and say "This guy must be great, but how come
he has so many 140 yd passing days.  Oh! He must be inconsistent!"

I believe that Krieg is in a perfect situation at Kansas City.  Schottenheimer
runs a ball control offense and the team is loaded with running talent.  The 
Chiefs defense is solid and has been getting a lot of turnovers.  Krieg
is a percentage passer who rarely throws stupid passes (perhaps he is too cautious, though).  The '92 Chiefs are not too different from the '84 Seahawks
except that one had awesome receivers and the other has awesome running backs.

The Chiefs (and their fans) shouldn't fool themselves into thinking they have another Warren Moon at QB, but should realize that some days Krieg can really click (as he did against Philly).  Krieg is good enough to lead the Chiefs to 
a 10 or 11 win season this year.  As for the playoffs, Krieg can be counted on
to play a solid game (the only exception in the past was against the 1983 Superbowl Champion Raiders).  And, the way the AFC is shaping up, KC has as
good a chance as anybody to make it through the playoffs.

David Langrock

Go Krieg!  Go Chiefs!
Win another game Seahawks!
Go 1993 NFL Draft!!!
From: caeser@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Robert Michael Trotter)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Lions at Vikings tonight (Thurs.)?
Date: 8 Oct 1992 20:48:28 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Keywords: Lions, Vikings, schedule

In article <1992Oct8.191607.1996@hubcap.clemson.edu> cowboy@hubcap.clemson.edu (Greg Barron) writes:
>Detroit is scheduled to play the Vikings at the Metrodome
>tonight (7:30 p.m. EST, TNT). Both teams were scheduled for
>a bye this week in the week-by-week listing I got back in
>July. Why the change? I must've been out to lunch when the
>game was moved.
>
	
	The Thursday game is Oct 15th.

	Caeser

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gidi@Hilbert.Stanford.EDU (Gidi Avrahami)
Subject: The Off-icial Dolphin Anti-Woof
Organization: Brotherhood Of Breath
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 23:33:23 GMT


FIVE AND OH!  ONLY UNDEFEATED TEAM IN THE NFL!

	We're not a winning team yet. Give us about three more victories.
	[...] I hope everyone realizes we're not an amazing team yet.

BUT YOU'RE GREAT!  #4 AGAINST THE RUN!  DYNAMITE!

	It doesn't mean much. Atlanta is pass oriented. Buffalo -- we got
	them out of their game plan right away [...]  I'm very cautious
	about giving us too many accolades yet. Give me another couple of
	months.

YOU'RE GOING TO CRUSH THE PATSIES!!

	They are stil dangerous.  All games are like that.


(from an interview with John Offerdahl.  The all-caps text is mine)


--Gidi (go patriots)
From: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: KC-Phil game:rule question
Date: 12 Oct 92 21:42:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: mccall.1992Oct12.154245
Reply-To: scott@mccall.com (Scott D. Davis)
Organization: The McCall Pattern Co., Manhattan, KS, USA
Nntp-Posting-User: scott


During the KC-Phil game, KC was punting.  A KC coverage guy(Thompson?)
ran into the Phil punt returner.  Flag thrown.  Upon refs discussion
the coverage man was pushed into the returner, no flag.  But shouldn't
that have meant the coverage man was pushed from behind?  Therefore,
a penalty?  Or, since there was no flag, then shouldn't the ball have
been downed where it stopped(or is it that the ref whistled the play
after the returner was hit?)?
--
Scott D. Davis <scott@mccall.com>       The McCall Pattern Company
(uucp: ...!widener!depot!mccall!scott)	615 McCall Road
(800)255-2762, in Kansas (913)776-4041  Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: martens@laurel.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bengals Query query?
Date: 16 Oct 92 15:41:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: cis.1992Oct16.154121.7780
Organization: Ohio State U. Dept. of Computer Science

In article <vamplew.719191237@probitas> vamplew@probitas.cs.utas.edu.au (Peter Vamplew) writes:

>Noticed during the highlights of the Bengals-Oilers game that the Bengals
>have a receiver called Query. Is this Jeff Query who used to play for
>the Packers? 

Yes.

>If so, when did the Bengals pick him up - I don't remember
>seeing him on the list of Plan B acquisitions.

The Bengals got him on waivers from the Oilers recently.  He may
have been injured reserve before being waived.  Probably a Bengal
or Oiler fan would know the details.
-- 
	Don't waste your time waving your hands
	and hoping when a rock or a club will do.

-- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro