HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hulsey@dbsun.uucp (hulsey)
Subject: Re: Clinton, draft dodger.  YUP!
Organization: BioMerieux-Vitek, St. Louis Mo.
Distribution: usa, na
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 19:29:21 GMT

In article <LARRY.92Sep9091330@peak.psl.nmsu.edu>
    larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way) writes:
>The mention of Hanoi Jane reminds me of a bumper sticker we saw:
>
>	Nuclear power plants are built better than Jane Fonda.
>
>Slapped on the same bumper, right below it, was another:
>
>	But which would you rather spend the night with?
>
>Actually, the real difference between Jane Fonda and Dan Quayle is about
>100 IQ points.

But who's IQ is higher?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
hulsey%dbsun.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu (Jim Hulsey)   TBDBITL '84 ('85 Rose Bowl)
An Ohioan living in Misery (Missouri, same difference)

Watch what you say!                Won't you sign up your name
They'll be calling you a radical   So you can be their dependable
A liberal, fanatical criminal      Respectable, presentable vegetable
--  Supertramp "The Logical Song"
From: steve@celia.UUCP (Steve Tyree)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Clinton, draft dodger.  YUP!
Date: 10 Sep 92 18:32:35 GMT
Reply-To: celia!steve@usc.edu (Steve Tyree)
Organization: Rhythm & Hues, Inc., Hollywood

In article <nate.547@psygate.psych.indiana.edu> nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle) writes:
->    Regardless of the quality of Quayle's legal work, Al, would you say 
->that Mitch has addressed Steve Tyree's original statement that Quayle has 
->"worked hard his entire life in the private sector"? As Alex pointed out, 
->between Dan's college career and his terms in Congress and the White House, 
->It's unclear just when he could have managed to fit in an "entire life" of 
->hard work in the private sector (unless he was moonlighting, of course).

 I am sorry that one liner slipped through the editor. Actually I was hoping
that the liberals would realise that they were caught up in a debate that
compared Dan Quayle to Bill Clinton. According to most media analyst, the
comparison should not even be close. :>

 Steve Tyree - These opinions are mine and mine alone.
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 08:24:13 EDT
From: <PXF3@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Lead in NYC water


Would someone please explain how getting the lead out of NYC water is going
to put people out of work?  Who puts the lead in?  What are they paid to do
this?  What training do you need to get one of these jobs?  Thanks, Paula
From: mitch@lsil.com (Mitch Sako)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Clinton, draft dodger.  YUP!
Date: 11 Sep 92 17:42:51 GMT
Reply-To: mitch@lsil.com
Organization: LSI Computing Systems

In article 92Sep11042153@world.std.com, art@world.std.com (Al Thompson) writes:
>In article <nate.549@psygate.psych.indiana.edu> nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle) writes:
>   art@world.std.com (Al Thompson) writes:
>   >I don't know if Quayle was a good lawyer or a bad one, but if you listen
>   >to Ted Kennedy you'll come off with the idea that he was a pretty damned
>   >good Senator.   Kennedy actually said that.
>       I guess it takes one to know one, eh? I don't wish to detract from your 
>   point, but I can't say that I would consider Ted Kennedy to be the best 
>   judge of what makes someone a good legislator. Maybe he just admires the 
>   way Dan holds his liquor.
>Well, you've almost got a point there.  The fact is I despise the Senator
>from Chappaquidick, but I also have to admit he works hard (for all the
>wrong things, yes, but hard he works).  And in that sense he is a "good"
>senator.   He and Quayle worked on several things together when Quayle
>was a senator, and Teddy has had nothing but good to say about him.

Have you ever heard any senator come out and say anything but disingenuous
praise for a fellow senator?  It is a rare time that any sitting politician
will attack another sitting politician.



---
===============================================================================
Mitch Sako	LSI Computing Systems			Office	408-433-4187
internet:	msako@lsil.com				FAX	408-433-8796
uucp:		lsil!msako
RIME:		->REDBARON, conference=POLITICS
Disclaimer:	Opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone and do not
		reflect those of anyone else including my organization,
		my management or my mother
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney)
Subject: New proposed Rush lingo:
Organization: California State University Sacramento
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 15:54:58 GMT


* Since Rush Limbaugh is staunchly pro-life;
* Since pro-abortionists have not had a hard term put on them in years;
* Since the biggest argument that they rely on is the scene of millions
of women dying in the streets because of coat hanger abortions if
abortion is ever banned; 

I hereby present to the Rush Limbaugh fans and propose to Rush
Limbaugh (by any means possible regarding getting this TO him!), a new
word for "pro-choice" activists: 

Coat Hanger Terrorists. 


=============================================================================
  One California Democrat for George Bush, Dan Quayle & Bruce Herschensohn! 
=============================================================================
|Pro-Contraception   Pro-Freedom of Religion, Speech & Sexual Orientation   |
|Pro-Privacy    Pro-Humanism   Pro-Freedom of Choice 	Registered Democrat | 
|                                                                           |
|			Card-carrying member, NRLC                          |
|           Dedicated to achieving civil rights for the unborn              |
=============================================================================
BBBBBB     OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    Founder: Steve Chaney 
B    B     O      O   S         S          <chaneysa@nextnet.ccs.csus.edu> 
BBBBBBBB   O     OO   SSSSSSS   SSSSSSS    
BB     B   O     OO        SS        SS    Borg Operating 
BBBBBBBB O OOOOOOOO O SSSSSSS O SSSSSSS O  Space Systems, Revision 2.0 

	       The B.O.S.S. does not speak for CSUS. 
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:5167 alt.rush-limbaugh:4363
From: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re:  Clinton, draft dodger.  YUP!
Date: 8 Sep 92 19:37:48 GMT
Distribution: usa, na
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

In article <1992Sep3.164143.4987@newsgate.sps.mot.com> titmas@chdasic.sps.mot.com (Eric Titmas) writes:

>This is the standard liberal justification for their double standard 
>regarding Quayle and Clinton service records.
>
>It's never made sense to me.  To be in favor of an action does *NOT* mean 
>that you have to do it.  For example,  I want all murderers put in prison 
>but I don't want to be a policeman.

Do you know the difference between Dan Quayle and Jane Fonda?

Jane Fonda had the courage of her convictions to go to Viet Nam.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: At last, a conservative comic strip!
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 92 01:57:00 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: usa

Well, I don't know if I would call it a *conservative* strip, but the 
BC comic strip has had a couple of zingers recently that conservatives
would like. Last week Wiley was sitting by a tree writing a poem about
how when the Supreme Court Justices find themselves in Heaven trying 
to explain their rulings against prayer and such they'd look in the 
Constitution and find nothing there to support them. The poem was 
much better phrased that this explanation, though.

Today's strip (9/8) has patient BC asking psychiatrist Peter "how can 
you tell if you're mind starts to go?" Peter replies "it's hard 
to say ... there is only one *sure* sign - you will start to do jokes
about Dan Quayle."

I've liked Johnny Hart for almost 15 years. Now I know why!
-- 
John Switzer               | 50 years from now, nobody will
                           | remember Candice Bergen or Murphy
74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | Brown, but every school kid will
jrs@netcom.com             | be taught about President Quayle.
From: acadams@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Arthur C. Adams)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Bush and the Debates
Date: 13 Sep 92 23:57:42 GMT
Organization: The Great Beyond

Why is George Bush so afraid to debate Bill Clinton?

The Bi-Partisan Commission on Debates, whose plan both parties
agrees to follow, stated a plan for three debates, including one
next week. The plan was to be more of a real debate (the candidates
and one moderator) rather than the "two person way press conference"
format from past years. One debate is scheduled for the week 
of September 13.

Clinton immediately accepted the plan. Bush know wants to go 
back to the traditional format, contrary to the agreement. He also
only wants two debates.

It seems obvious to me why Bush is so afraid - he knows that, on the
issues, he can't stand up to Clinton face-to-face. A real debate
means he's have to directly argue policy with his opponent, rather
than just field questions from the press. He just doesn't have
the guts - he'd rather just set and cast aspersions on Clinton's
draft record. 
-- 
The world is not analog. The world is digital,
with an incredible number of bits.
Arthur C. Adams (not the comic-book artist)                        <fnord>
E-Mail acadams@afterlife.ncsc.mil
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: jsw@cray.com (Jon S. Wood)
Subject: Re: SPEECH: Dan Quayle on "Restoring Basic Values"
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 15 Sep 92 13:33:52 CDT

In article <1992Sep14.220421.23380@ils.nwu.edu> hooker@aristotle.ils.mwu.edu ( BOB HOOKER) writes:
>In article <5284@news.duke.edu>, eyc@acpub.duke.edu (EMIL CHUCK) writes:
>
>> 
>> Let me share with you a few statistics on the difference between black
>> poverty in particular in the 1960's and now.
>> 	- In 1967, 68% of black families were headed by married couples.
>> In 1991, only 48% of black families were headed by both a husband and
>> wife.
>> 	- In 1965, the illegitimacy rate among black families was 28%.
>> In 1989, 65% -- two-thirds -- of all black children were born to
>> never-married mothers.
>
>In the Summer 1968 there were Riots in Black areas all oiver the country; 
>Detriot, Chicago, New York, LA, etc.  
>
>In 1992 there was a Riot in L.A..  
>
>Clearly the level of social anarchy was greater in 1968 then in 1992.  SO
>how have the increase in alternative family situations lead to greater
>riots when an increase in these alternatives was accompined by a decrease
>in the number of riots?
>
>There nis no doubt that children are being neglected in inner cities at a
>tragic rate, crime, unemployment, racism, drugs, (in LA the LAPD was a
>problem) and yes the present welfare system is to complicated and does not
>provide enough insentive.  

Who has neglected them? The government or their families? What have
you done to help the tragic crime rate, unemployment, racism and drugs
if the government has failed? I suggest you move to the inner city
and help them or elect Clinton so he can raise your taxes so that
"you" can hire someone else (the government) to do it for ya? Outside
of raising taxes to 'buy' jobs, what do you propose?

>
>But to assert that these problems would all get better if Blacks started to
>get married is alittle silly.  To assert that the decline in the nuclear
>family structure is a cause  has not been as of yet backed up.
>

 Who pays for unemployed singe parent families and how would you 
propose to change the appalling statistic, if indeed you don't
see a correlation between the two?
From: starbuck@ucrmath.ucr.edu (starbuck)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush's TV Show: Will it Succeed?
Date: 15 Sep 92 17:26:46 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of California, Riverside

In article <1992Sep8.015752.5822@afterlife.ncsc.mil> acadams@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Arthur C. Adams) writes:
-Okay, tough question: what are the chances of Rush's tv show 
-succeeding?
-
-I don't see it as very likely. In most places, its on late-night.

In the LA area Rush is on station 13 at 3:30 PM.  I think the time varies
between markets.

starbuck
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way)
Subject: Re: Rush's TV Show: Will it S
Organization: New Mexico State University, MetaPhysical Science Laboratory
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 02:36:23 GMT

In article <6864.1251.uupcb@spacebbs.com> mark.stevens@spacebbs.com (Mark Stevens)  writes:

   To: acadams@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Arthur C. Adams)

   AC>Okay, tough question: what are the chances of Rush's tv show
   AC>succeeding?

   AC>I don't see it as very likely. In most places, its on late-night.

   In San Francisco it's scheduled for 2am.  It's on the CBS affiliate.
   I was kindof surprised that it was on such a strong station.  But it's
   going to have to get very good ratings for a station to move it
   from that time period.  This is usually the time period a station will
   move a new syndicated show once it fails in it's regular time and
   they are just playing episodes till their contract expires.  It's
   pretty unusual to debue a show in this time slot.  I would imagine
   they are protecting the show so that if it becomes a hit they will
   have the rights to it and will move it to a better time.
   ---
    . DeLuxe./386 1.25 #42 . 

Well, if CBS has the rights to it, I wonder why it is available on ABC and
NBC in my area?

Also, don't assume the 2 AM time slot is so bad - Amazing Discoveries must
have paid millions out for that slot so far.

L.
"Yeh, Buddy..            | larry@psl.nmsu.edu (Larry Cunningham)|  _~~_
 I've got your COMPUTER! | % Physical Science Laboratory        | (O)(-)
 Right HERE!!"           | New Mexico State University          |  /..\ 
 (computer THIS!)        | Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 88003    |   <> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are CORRECT, mine, and not PSLs or NMSUs..
Larry's BACK! And this time he's got a CHAIN SAW! Stop me, before I POST AGAIN!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu (Norman St. John Polevaulter)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Clinton, draft dodger. YUP!
Date: 10 Sep 92 15:53:53 GMT
 <mykes.0dcp@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG> <1992Sep7.191117.13377@uncle.cmhnet.org>
 <1992Sep10.070350.16239@usl.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: The Leader Desslok School of Diplomacy

In article <1992Sep10.070350.16239@usl.edu>, das9674@usl.edu (Stephenson Daniel
A) says:
>In article <1992Sep7.191117.13377@uncle.cmhnet.org> david@uncle.cmhnet.org
>writes:
>>
>>...all of which has nothing to do if someone can do the job or not.

>Like being Commander in Chief?

Yup. Exactly. You catch on quick.

Ronald Reagan, for example, got out of the WWII draft, spending the war making
movies in Hollywood. I presume you don't think that made HIM unfit to be
Commander in Chief, do you?

[Your blood pressure just went up.]       Mark Sachs IS: mbs110@psuvm.psu.edu
       DISCLAIMER: If it ain't money, Penn State doesn't care about it.
   "Ladies and gentlemen, I've suffered for my music! Now it's your turn!"
From: mitch@lsil.com (Mitch Sako)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Clinton, draft dodger. YUP!
Date: 8 Sep 92 18:23:48 GMT
Reply-To: mitch@lsil.com
Organization: LSI Computing Systems

In article 13377@uncle.cmhnet.org, david@uncle.cmhnet.org () writes:
>
>
>....all of which has nothing to do if someone can do the job or not.


Thank you.
---
===============================================================================
Mitch Sako	LSI Computing Systems			Office	408-433-4187
internet:	msako@lsil.com				FAX	408-433-8796
uucp:		lsil!msako
RIME:		->REDBARON, conference=POLITICS
Disclaimer:	Opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone and do not
		reflect those of anyone else including my organization,
		my management or my mother
From: paul@sofya.math.byu.edu (Paul Shawcroft)
Subject: Need TV Showtimes
Reply-To: paul@sofya.math.byu.edu (Paul Shawcroft)
Organization: Brigham Young University -- Mathematics Department
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 22:17:55 GMT


I'm posting this message only as a last resort.  Does anyone in
netland know when Rush's TV show is broadcast to the Salt Lake City
viewing area?  I've checked the TV guides and the newspapers and I
can't find it anywhere.

Thanks in advance!

Paul Shawcroft
paul@sofya.math.byu.edu
Provo -- Home of SI's most hated college football team!!
From: tom@tredysvr.Tredydev.Unisys.COM (Tom Albrecht)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: At last, a conservative comic strip!
Date: 11 Sep 92 16:53:10 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Unisys, Applied Technology, Malvern, PA

[Warning: this message is off the suject.]

In article <xxsn2lp.mvp@netcom.com> mvp@netcom.com (Mike Van Pelt) writes:
>-- 
>Mike Van Pelt                 "There are only two religions on this planet.
>mvp@netcom.com                 There's the one that says that God is God,
>mvp@hsv3.lsil.com              and the one that says that Man is God."
>                                                -- Frank Peretti

Interesting bit of semi-plagerism on the part of Peretti.  Many years ago,
a much better writer said:

	There are two kinds of people in the world; those who say to
	God, "Thy will be done", and those to whom God says,
	"Go ahead, then, have it your way".

				C.S.Lewis
-- 
Tom Albrecht
From: snyder3338@iscsvax.uni.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: WWOR??
Date: 15 Sep 92 01:30:13 -0500
Organization: University of Northern Iowa

Got a question:  Does anyone know if the T.V. show is being carried on a major
cable network.   I thought I heard rush say that WWOR out of New York would be
carrying it???  Does anyone know of any big stations that have it???

Jeff Snyder

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: alex@engr3.umbc.edu (alex)
Subject: Re: Bush and the Debates
Organization: University of Maryland, Baltimore County Campus
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:11:24 GMT

In article <1992Sep15.172630.12628@news.uiowa.edu> bnolte@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Bill Nolte) writes:

>If you read up on things instead of assuming that Dan Rather is God,
>you would know that this so-called bi-partison group cleared dates
>for the debates with the Clinton camp, set up the dates, and then
>told the Bush camp when they would be held.  Sounds like a "set up"
>Bill Nolte

	Sounds more like "paranoid". The commitee set up three dates
and a format, and the clinton camp agreed. This is a little different
the "clearing [them] with the Clinton camp". If Clinton had not agreed
to the dates, then they would look just like Bush does now, afraid.



-- 
                               Alex Crain::UMBC Academic Computing Services
"I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens,
 nor should they be considered patriots.  This is one nation under God"
                                     - George Herbert Walker Bush, Feb 1989
From: kmitche@eis.calstate.edu (Kenneth Mitchell)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Bush and the Debates
Date: 15 Sep 92 05:12:20 GMT
Organization: Calif State Univ/Electronic Information Services

->
->Does anybody else have any ideas on why George is so bloomin' afraid?
->

(note: I'm not a Bush supporter, but I like Clinton even less.) Bush has a
history of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Look at the
miserable end to the Gulf War. Look at his timidity during the collapse of
the USSR, and the way he counselled the former Yogoslav states to stay
together. Bush is a creature of habit who thinks that things should be as
they have been. He fears ANY change. 

Ken Mitchell
kmitche@eis.calstate.edu
From: jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer)
Subject: Re: Scarey tag line...
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 13:14:42 GMT
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Distribution: world,usa,na,alt

In article <1992Sep14.195044.6499@waggen.twuug.com> broberts@waggen.twuug.com (Bill Roberts) writes:
>jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
>
>>-- 
>>John Switzer               | 50 years from now, nobody will
>>                           | remember Candice Bergen or Murphy
>>74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | Brown, but every school kid will
>>jrs@netcom.com             | be taught about President Quayle.
>
>The thought in that tag line is "scarey!",  and I am not talking about
>the part about Bergen or Brown....

Well, what about my backup .sig:

Quayle in 1996, 2000, and 2004 (once we fix that dang Constitution)
-- 
John Switzer               | 50 years from now, nobody will
                           | remember Candice Bergen or Murphy
74076.1250@Compuserve.com  | Brown, but every school kid will
jrs@netcom.com             | be taught about President Quayle.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: das9674@usl.edu (Stephenson Daniel A)
Subject: Al Gore Snafu-
Organization: University of Southwestern Louisiana
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 06:11:48 GMT

Maybe some of out there could expand on this:

I heard that Al Gore actually came out and said that he was against
ALL NEW offshore oil exploration/drilling.  Is this true?

Does Clinton/Gore, like, WANT to win Texas and Louisiana??

Note that I live in Lousiana, and oil is BIG in the south of it.
--
Dan Stephenson                                           das9674@usl.edu
" BERLIN WALL FALLS.  3 BORDER GUARDS LOSE JOBS.  CLINTON BLAMES BUSH! "
        -George Bush, '92 Republican nomination acceptance speech
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:5269 rec.humor:28382 talk.bizarre:29732 talk.politics.misc:44844
From: mwilson@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Mark Wilson)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.humor,talk.bizarre,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Bush Campaign TV Ad
Date: 11 Sep 92 16:56:11 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: NCR Engineering and Manufacturing Atlanta -- Atlanta, GA

In <1992Sep11.085452.3350@walter.cray.com> toma@romulus.cray.com (Thomas Arneberg) writes:

>I'm pretty sure that Congress exempts itself from all quota legislation
>("Affirmative Action"f  you prefer euphemisms). Why would they force
>businesses to do things that they themselves can't abide by?

They have also exempted themselves from OSHA, minimum wage, and just
about every other piece of health and labor bill you have ever heard of.

What would be funny if it weren't so sick.

After the latest major bill, (I think it was the Americans with Disabilities
Act, but I am not sure) congress for once had the guts to not exclude itself.

About 2 months later some representative presented a bill to exclude
congress after all.  (They waited until they thought no one was looking.
What else is new.)
During the debate one of the congresscritters acutally had the gall to
complain about the amount of paper work the act required.
"How do they expect us to get any work done?" is what he said.

Needless to say, congress at least, no longer has to worry about all
that paper work.

And they wonder why the rest of the country holds them in such low regard.

-- 
--Mark
My opinions are mine, all mine.  Unless someone else claims them first.

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh