HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Pause before you consider OS/2 (was Re: Win 3.1 not THAT great.)
Date: 13 Apr 92 20:03:35 GMT
Organization: Harvey Mudd College

Minor correction of OS/2 information:


victor@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (V Menayang) writes:

>[reasons not to go to OS/2]

>1. You have a 16MHz SX or slower-cpu machine
>2. Your hard drive is 80MB or smaller
>3. You have less than 6MB of RAM

Agreed, on the condition you are unable/not willing to upgrade.
If you can't meet these requirements, my recommendation is to stick
with Windows.

>4. You use one windows application intensively
>   and are not willing to trade it with anything else.

Change "intensively" to "exclusively".  If you only use that one
app intensively, some of the other features of OS/2 (like inter-app
protection) might appeal to you.

>5. You don't have any os/2 or PM application

Change this to "You don't have the money to buy *any* new software
in the future."  If you have the money to buy/upgrade to new Windows
or DOS apps, you surely have enough money to do so with OS/2 apps.

>6. You want a fast and snappy GUI environment

The OS/2 GUI is fast and snappy.  It's just that everything you've learned
with previous GUIs says you're supposed to close folders/windows when you
want to put them away for a while.  If you hide OS/2 folders (same place
as the minimize button) rather than closing them, it acts just like you've
closed it except it is much faster.  And expect a 40%-90% speed boost when
the 32-bit graphics engine is added.

>And remember, as one writer puts it, when you use OS/2
>you inherit the problems from all three operating environment 

It's interesting you bring up this statement.  Feature of Win31 excepted,
how is this a negative?  If you went back to your old environment, you'd
still have the same problems.  With OS/2, you just get to use all three
environments at once on the same machine, and a problem in one environment
doesn't affect any other environment.

>(Yes, you'll get the UAE's that we Win31 user no longer see).

You'll get the UAE, but OS/2 will trap it as well as, if not better
than Win31.  If you want to be insured of protection between different
Windows apps, run them in different sessions, or seamless.  Even Win31
cannot provide this type of protection.  UAEs will no doubt change when
Win31 compatibility is added.
-- 
John H. Kim                 | (This space to be filled when I
jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu | think of something very clever 
uunet!jarthur!jokim         | to use as a disclaimer)
From: merrill@cs.arizona.edu (Darren Merrill)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: : -)
Date: 14 Apr 92 00:04:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: caslon.3610
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <1992Apr13.182127.2035@news.iastate.edu> arakins@iastate.edu (Andrew R Akins) writes:
>In article <1992Apr13.170655.8546@wam.umd.edu> pr@wam.umd.edu (Jesus M. Rodriguez) writes:
>>	WINDOWS SUCKS!!!   Irritating isn't it!! Also Win 3.1 sucks too. :-)
[stuff deleted to shorten post]
>unproductive and useless. I have no problems with OS/2 users DISCUSSING
>or EXPLANING why OS/2 is superior to Windows. I am not familiar with
>OS/2, being a loyal Win 3.x user, but I am interested. And if OS/2
[more stuff deleted]

YO!! Who ever said this was an OS/2 user?  Just because the guy said
he hates windows *automatically* labels him as an OS/2 bigot?!?  Come
on now.  This is all getting out of hand.  


-- 
Darren Merrill                  UUCP: uunet!arizona!merrill
University of Arizona           Bitnet: merrill%cs.arizona.edu@arizona.bitnet
Department of Computer Science  Internet: merrill@cs.arizona.edu
From: cfs@cowpas.waffle.atl.ga.us (Root Account)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: QEMM 5.11 & WIN 3.1
Date: 11 Apr 92 06:42:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: cowpas.ug12iB1w165w
Organization: COW Pastures

john.will@satalink.com (John Will) writes:

> TO: shopsis@auvax1.adelphi.edu
> S5>I haven't loaded win 3.1 yet.  I'm using QEMM 5.11.  Does anyone know 
> S5>if there is a conflict between these two?
> 
> I tried to install with QEMM 5.11, crashed and burned in 386 enhanced mode.
> Updated it to 6.01, runs fine.  I'd say that you should update if you
> intend to install Windows 3.1. :-)

        Not true, I am using a version 5 copy of QEMM386 and it works 
fine, you need to set these parameters before running in 386 enhanced 
mode:

                ram X=B000-B7FF

        That should get it to work.  I do however recommend that you 
upgrade as soon as possible.
Xref: sparky comp.windows.ms:12748 comp.windows.ms.programmer:5445
From: bkph@wheat-chex.ai.mit.edu (Berthold K.P. Horn)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: fax board printer driver
Date: 15 Apr 92 02:01:28 GMT
Followup-To: comp.windows.ms


I tried to reply to Joerg Moellenhoff, but his email bounced, so here goes...

When I said that the FAXit Windows driver had a Windows 2.x interface, I
didn't mean to say it doesn't work in Windows 3.x.  What I meant is that it
does not support the ExtDevMode call, which printer drivers starting in
Windows 3.0 were supposed to support.  Instead you have to do a
GetEnvironment call, after fishing out the old DEVMODE procdure address.  

Most applications know how to deal with both types of drivers, so things are
farily transparent in most cases, but there are some important differences
between Windows 2.x and Windows 3.x drivers such as how the `default driver'
is handled (per application or one per Windows), and also you can't asily
modify things like landscape/portrait settings because you don't know where
in the DEVMODE data that information is kept (it varies from printer driver
to printer driver).

Following Joerg's recommendation, I did try the latest version.  The manual
is marked 2.01 (from Alien Software, sold by SofNet), and the About box says
2.15E. This version, which I just obtained recently does NOT support the new
driver calls. RUmour has it that there is a newone in the works (version
2.5?) that does...

I have no quarrel with this software, by the way, I think it is great!

(Although software can always be improved - in this case, I think it would
be nice if it supported half-toning of gray-level images rather than
just thresholding them).

Berthold K.P. Horn
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: heathh@cco.caltech.edu (Heath Ian Hunnicutt)
Subject: Can Windows play *.MID files on my Sound Blaster alone?
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 23:01:29 GMT

Hi,
	I have Win 3.1 and a Sound Blaster ver 1.5 (test-sbc says my
DAC is ver 2.01) 

	I had no trouble setting up the control panel so that .WAV files
play out the Sound Blaster, but I haven't been able to configure the MIDI
panel so that .MID files will play.

	Can someone who has had some success with this please tell me
what to do?  Or do I need external MIDI hardware?

Thanks in advance,
Heath

-- 
Pert Plus is a technological breakthrough designed for today's active people
to look great without a fuss.  Pert Plus is a _complete shampoo plus
conditioner in one bottle_!  PERT PLUS REALLY WORKS!
(My opinions are my own, not Caltech's, not even Procter & Gamble's)
From: swaliff@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Steve Aliff)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: QEMM 6, windows and DOS box
Summary: QEMM and Windows, etc. It works for me.
Date: 15 Apr 92 21:59:08 GMT
Organization: The Great Beyond


I use QEMM in Stealth mode reliably on a 386 system based on a the
Technology Power MB. However, it did take quite a bit of tinkering to
get it right. I used the procedures outlined in the QD Tech Notes on
WUARCHIVE and elsewhere. Here's the way QEMM is setup on my system
today:

DEVICE=C:\QEMM\QEMM386.SYS ram st:m fr=c800 x=b000-b7ff x=c000-c0ff
       x=c700-c7ff x=fc00-fcff x=fe00-ffff

The biggest problem I had was that the Win 3.0 DCS SpeedStar drivers
accessed their ROM directly (hence the Cxxx excludes above). I
haven't gotten the 3.1 drivers from DCS yet and am running with the
Tseng drivers.
-- 
Steve Aliff (swaliff@afterlife.ncsc.mil [144.51.1.1])
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: comptec91055@camins.camosun.bc.ca
Subject: help network id...
Organization: Camosun College
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1992 03:16:27 GMT

		To windows programmers:

			I'm writing a network card id program from windows
and im wondering which interrupts are designated for network cards and what
information can be gained by using them.  If anyone has any hints I'll send
a completed copy of my c/assembly program which does some light system 
examining, not that it would be needed by anyone who is able to answer this,
but oh-well.  if anyone is able to answer, please send by EMail.
		D.Rozee
From: fallavol@fred.nas.nasa.gov (Michael A. Fallavollita)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: ATI Drivers for 3.1 PLEASE!!!
Date: 14 Apr 92 01:53:01 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: NAS, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA

Can anyone forward the Windows 3.1 drivers for the ATI Wonder card to me?
I've been waiting for them to hit ftp.cica.indiana.edu which just came
back up, but I have a paper due tomorrow and I could really use the
256 color drivers for a few pictures I'm importing.

If someone already has them, I'd sure appreciate it if you could mail
them to me.  If not, I guess I'll keep looking at CICA like everyone
else.

Thanks.

Mike Fallavollita
fallavol@corvus.arc.nasa.gov
From: hzh@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Trident BBS?
Date: 11 Apr 92 21:49:00 EST
Distribution: comp
Organization: Cornell University

Does anybody here uses the Trident BBS?  I tried to call the BBS for
the past 3 days hoping to find a new driver for windows 3.1.  I can't
even get on to the BBS!  Either I get busy signals or the BBS does not
respond to my returns after I am connected.  Any clue?  Also
Does anybody has the new drivers for the Trident 8900 800X600 256 color
driver?  Can he please put it at a ftp site?
	Any help will be greatly appreciated.
							Marshall Lia
					internet:HZH@vax5.cit.cornell.edu

Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc
From: rm3@ornl.gov (MCBROOM R C)
Subject: Re: Tastes gross/more fattening (repost (last attempt only got ~1 site))
Keywords: (hex encoded ASCII) 3A 2D 29
Organization: Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 16:36:25 GMT

In article <gnash.702795863@ee.uts.EDU.AU> gnash@ee.uts.edu.au (Greg Nash) writes:
>  OS/2 -- the windows development platform!!
>
>(Ignoring the implications of actually writing windows code..)
>Developing under OS/2, when your application gives you a UAE,
>OS/2 will tell you what it was trying to do at the time...
>A good debugging tool?
>
>  :-)
But if you don't have access to the code or the programmer it is just a screen
full of garbage.  Long live the Free Software Foundation!
From: frank@algol.bsa.de (Frank Huemme)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: SoundBlaster on Exit.
Date: 15 Apr 92 15:52:54 GMT
Organization: BSA

nsus_cif@troi.cc.rochester.edu (Nick Susch) writes:

>I have a question about Win3.1 and the Soundblaster, actually a probalem,
>and was wondering if any one else has come accross it. Sometimes, when I
>quit windows, it leaves my Soundblaster in a state of "dissarray". Thats is,

The same on my machine ( Win 31 and Soundblaster Pro )
Maybe the new Driver for the Soundblaster will fix the problem

		Frank

-- 
Frank Huemme	frank@algol.bsa.de	email: ..!unido!algol!frank
From: lauch@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu (Chung Lau)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: SMARTDRV 4.0 weirdness
Date: 10 Apr 92 18:10:05 GMT
Organization: University of Engineering, College of Engineering

In article <201@bsc835bsc.edu> ehunt@bsc835bsc.edu (Eric Hunt) writes:
>In article <1992Apr8.201752.14754@news.Hawaii.Edu>, lauch@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu (Chung Lau) writes:
>>   Re: the new smartdrv,  does anyone know how to set the max.
>> cache size (eats up 2 megs on mine!).  I've read the manual and
>
>The same way you did with the old smartdrv.sys
>The line in my autoexec.bat reads:
>c:\windows\smartdrv 1024 1024
>
>and I get a 1meg cache inside and outside of Windows 3.1 now.

  Boy do I feel stupid. 8)

  I tried that combination and didn't work, then I found out that you
can't change the cache size (at least I couldn't) once smartdrv is
launched.  The solution - change the line in autoexec.bat and reboot.

  Boy I would think smartdrv 4.0 should be able to change the cache
size on the fly, guess not.

*---------------------------------------------------------------------*
Stephen Lau, Electrical Engineering, Univ. of Hawaii           
Internet: lauch@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu, Stephen_Lau@asylum.flex.com
From: drake@drake.almaden.ibm.com (Sam Drake)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Number of OS/2 2.0 orders (was Re: Why go to 3.1 if 2.0 works)
Date: 16 Apr 92 04:31:38 GMT
Organization: IBM Almaden Research Center

In article <1992Apr15.144117.27930@alw.nih.gov> donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn) writes:
>In article <1644@rufus.UUCP> drake@drake.almaden.ibm.com (Sam Drake) writes:
>/>Quite true.  However, a version of the PS/1 with OS/2 pre-loaded will 
>/>be available in the "Spring of 1992".
>Ehmmm!  Isn't that already here?

Yes, but it's not over.  "available in the spring" means "not later than 
June 21".


Sam Drake / IBM Almaden Research Center 
Internet:  drake@almaden.ibm.com    BITNET:  DRAKE at ALMADEN
From: fahole@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Why I hate [insert here] (this newsgroup)
Date: 13 Apr 92 14:27:59 MDT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <1992Apr13.081622.1@bigez>, dmmatt@bigez (Mike Mattix) writes:
> God I hate doing this.  I have been trying to not fuel the flames but,  this
> is not (I repeat NOT) an OS/2 news group.  Most of the people who used to read
> this newsgroup are using Windows not OS/2.  I for one have an extremely good
> reason for it, it supports my network (DECs Pathworks) and OS/2 V2.0 does not.
> I am sure many of the other good readers have their own reasons.  If the purpose
> of this newsgroup is for the OS/2 and Windows proponents to beat up each other
> let me know.  I will drop this newsgroup.  I get just (and just barely) enough
> INFORMATION out of this newsgroup to keep reading it.  Others in my organization
> have JUST SAID NO and dropped it.  I agree with Marc, this newsgroup is to 
> exchange information on the problems and solutions regarding Microsoft Windows 
> 3.x.  All this MAC vs WIN, Amiga vs WIN, Unix vs WIN, and OS/2 vs WIN stuff 
> is just getting in the way.  If it continues I will just have to say goodbye.
> My time to valuable for all this.

Amen
I feel exactly the same way and have come close to deregistering this group
several times now.  The thing is, this use to be one of the highest signal
to noise ratio groups with the most helpful people.  Now it has the lowest
S/N of any group save alt.flame (0 S/N)

-- 
David Hole                  FAHOLE@USU
Utah State University       FAHOLE@CC.USU.EDU
Logan, UT                   Just say snow!
From: tanida@forseti.css.gov (Tom Tanida)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Review and Question of : Windows 3.1
Date: 16 Apr 92 23:30:06 GMT
Reply-To: tanida@esosun.css.gov (Tom Tanida)
In-reply-to: swyatt@ravel.udel.edu (Stephen L Wyatt)

In article <18800@ravel.udel.edu>, swyatt@ravel (Stephen L Wyatt) writes:
>3.    fdi3..fd kjfdlsj

3. fjki.. kdi lkdaf! :-)

>3.  I am thinking about getting a sound board, since windows supports it,
>    and I do have alot of games that support sound boards, like WC II, etc.
>
>    Should I get a Soundblaster, or Adlib?  Which is better?  
>    I was told that I can digitize sound, play sound, and that one of them
>      also has a joystick port.... and help would be appreciated..
>      and do I need to get some special drivers from somewhere?

I think it's the net.consensus that the standard Soundblaster
(currently on the 2.0 ROM revision, not 1.5, so you might want to
check before you buy) is superior to the standard Adlib.  The SB has
a digital to analog converter which will let you play .WAV files under
Windows with the drivers that come with Win 3.1.  The SB has the
joystick port.

Recording with the SB is OK if you're doing voice like with an
ordinary tape recorder, but for any decent
quality signals I'd look elsewhere.  The Adlib doesn't have any
recording capabilities.

I don't plan to get into the SB Pro vs. Adlib Gold debates. Besides,
I'm saving up for a Pro Audio Spectrum 16 anyway- built in SCSI, stereo sound at
16-bit, 44.1 KhZ sampling rate (CD quality- get some free HD space
ready) for only $249 via mail order.

-Tom
tanida@esosun.css.gov
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: burgoyne@highlite.uucp (J. Robert Burgoyne)
Subject: Windows 3.1 and the new Smartdrive (It's FAAAAAAAST!)
Organization: Gotham Communications Research, Laurel, MD
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 13:12:29 GMT

Holy Cow! My hard disk is on steroids!

During the installation it asked me to disable Hyperdisk to let
Smartdrv do its thing. OK.

Next, I set the Virtual Memory to "Use 32 bit Disk Access". It's
done like this:

	Control Panel
	386 Enhanced
	Virtual Memory
	Use 32 Bit Disk Access
		(Warning messages appear about using a laptop with
		 32 bit access.)

File saves take no time at all now. If only Word Perfect for Windows
wasn't still so intolerably slow.

Robert
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: paul@panix.com (Paul Gatker)
Subject: Re: CTRL-D Thing & Windows 3.1 Surprise
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 23:26:37 GMT
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC

In <1286@hydra.bucknell.edu> ehrlich@bucknell.edu (David Ehrlich -- BSCS '92) writes:

>I'm very pleased with the new version of Windows -- it finally allows my machine (an old 16 mhz 386) to properly multitask several dos sessions.  I think this has something to do with the new method of setting up the permanent swap file -- something 3.0 couldn't do on my machine (for some unknown reason).  Overall, I've been very impressed with the speed enhancements and other minor fixes.  

>Now, if only the new versions of himem.sys would function properly with my machine......
>------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Have you used the PrintManager in Win3.1? I was wondering if it has been
improved since the printmanager in 3.0 was so poor.


-- 
*******************************************************************
 paul@panix.com                            COMPULITE GRAPHICS
brooklyn, ny, usa                         Design & Consultation
*********************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: floydb@rpi.edu 
Subject: Re: Boo Hiss MicroSoft
Reply-To: floydb@rpi.edu 
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute - Admin. 
Distribution: world 
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 15:32:53 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.002110.9996@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> dab6@po.CWRU.Edu (Douglas A. Bell) writes:
>
>In a previous article, daveb@merlin.wpd.sgi.com (Dave Babcock) says:
>
>>Well my copy of Windows 3.1 didn't arrive on Monday by 10am as promised.
>>
>>I called Microsoft (to get the Air Bill) and then Federal Express.  FedEx
>>told me it was shipped "ECONOMY" and in no way would it have gotten to me
>>by Monday 10am.  It will be delivered by Wednesday 4:30pm.
>>
..
>At least IBM does not charge me for the upgrade to 2.0,
>for the product or the shipping.
>-- 
 
Will there ever be the day when this (and other groups) doesn't have
a 10%-30% weenie factor? I don't expect 0%, but maybe 5% spillage from
a comp.windows.ms.weenie group (due to the ever evil crossposts).
 
Not to make people think that weenies are purely technical phenomenon,
no they exist in politics, academics, amongst friends and family (e.g.
some weenie in politics recently complained that the NY State budget,
once again, wasn't passed on time -- it was 10-20 hours late this year
vs several months late the previous 5-8 years).
 
By posting this, of course, I am openning the weenie floodgates from
hell... :-<
 
barry
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: kadie@herodotus.cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M. Kadie)
Subject: Win 3.1: $20 Disney sound "card"?
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 01:07:18 GMT

Is there a Win 3.1 driver for the Disney Sound Source anywhere?

- Carl



--
Carl Kadie -- kadie@cs.uiuc.edu -- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
From: oliver@redwood.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Oliver Sharp)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: A note on Norton Desktop 2.0
Keywords: Incompatible
Date: 9 Apr 92 18:57:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: agate.s242kINN2k2
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: redwood.cs.berkeley.edu


Hey everyone; I just upgraded to Win 3.1 and Desktop 2.0.  Everything is
working fine, and much faster (especially switching between DOS apps,
which is now instantaneous when they fit into memory).  I had this silly
problem in Desktop, due to an idiotic choice of default settings by the
install program, so I thought I'd mention it.  This *may* have something 
to do with the fact that I installed Desktop 2.0 on top of 1.0.
At any rate, the "View" "Filter" option in the drive window defaulted to
not displaying files with the archive bit set (!!).  However, in the upper
right hand corner, it correctly tells you how many files are in the
directory.  I was looking at a just created directory, hit refresh, and the
thing told me "0k bytes in 17 files" and said there weren't any files in
the directory.  Sigh.  In the View-Filter dialog box, double click on the
box for archive bits.  The first click puts a cross in it, meaning only
display files that have the bit set, and the second click makes it dark
grey, meaning don't pay any attention to it.  You can do the same for system,
hidden, and read-only files.

Just thought it might save someone else some confusion ...

- Oliver
From: lchang@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Ling Chang)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Win3.1 Print Manager & TEMP
Date: 7 Apr 92 18:09:02 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

Win 3.1 is great!
Print manager, using the dj500 new driver, is very fast.
I was wondering whether Print manager uses temp file in the temp directory.
Currently , I have the temp set to a ramdrive.
If Print manager doesn't use the temp dir for temp files, then I can
have a smaller ramdrive.

Any input?

Ling S. Chang
lchang@eniac.seas.upenn.edu
From: john.will@satalink.com (John Will) 
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: RE: MORE BUGS IN 3.1
Date: 16 Apr 92 18:53:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: SataLink Info Systems - Huntingdon Valley, PA - 215-364-3324
Reply-To: john.will@satalink.com (John Will) 

TO: pss1@kepler.unh.edu
PS.But wait...it seems like _all_ my apps only allow one copy to run at a
  .time under 3.1.

Hmm... I just fired up multiple copies of Terminal, Paintbruch, Notepad,
Mlink (comm program), etc.  Apparently some applications are restricted,
but certainly not all.  BTW, I can't run two copies of WFW 1.1a, but I
don't recall ever trying that under 3.00.
---
 . KingQWK 1.05 . The scenery only changes for the lead dog.
From: aki@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Here is the fake Bill Gates post
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 92 16:12:54 PST
Reply-To: aki@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us

In article <2APR199212390112@utkvx2.utk.edu>, menees@utkvx2.utk.edu (Menees, Bill) writes:
> 
> From: bgates@microsoft.com ($2e9 man)


Gotta be a fake.  I thought he was the $6e9 man.
                                        ===

Aki.
-- 
/  Phone: 408-662 9664 Fax: 662 9676  |  "Aki" pronounced: Ah-Key. I know  \ 
\  GENIE: A.KORHONEN  Home: /dev/nul  |  what I'm doing most of the time.  /
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
From: jkb@ms.uky.edu (Keith Burton)
Subject: ATI DRIVERS POSTED TO CICA!
Keywords: ATI WIN31 VGA WONDER XL
Summary: Win31 drivers for ATI Wonder series on Cica
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 22:12:48 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
X-Bytes: 

Never could get thru to the ATI BBS, but ATI finally sent the files to
Compuserve, and I got them there.

Look on ftp.cica.indiana.edu in "/pub/pc/win3/uploads" for file "ativga.zip".
ATI bundled all the Wonder series drivers together, so I'm afraid it's a
whopper (500K).  The new features work great. Have fun!

Keith Burton