HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: solensky@world.std.com (Frank T Solensky)
Subject: Re: YAFP: Results, line for week 5
Reply-To: fbpool-request@world.std.com
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
	<1992Sep30.133214.12530@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 06:22:56 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.133214.12530@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> mzhao@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Min Zhao) writes:
   In article <SOLENSKY.92Sep30011105@world.std.com> fbpool@world.std.com writes:
   >                        *** The Standings ***
   >
   >1	adkins@ee.eng.ohio-state.edu (Kenneth C. Adkins)  	33710
   >2	Robert Treese <robert@landru.mtc.ti.com>          	  950

     Just curious, the gap between #1 and #2 is so large it almost seems the
   pool will be no contest for anyone below Kenneth. How can Ken blow the lead ?
   (only wonder I saw was Bush blew his 90% approval *-)

      I wondered the same thing last week, can someone explain the works ?

In week 2 or 3, I don't remember which offhand, Ken put just about all of
the points he had on three bets:  one was a three-team parlay, another was
a ten-team parlay and the third was all 14 pro games.  He got all of the
picks right in the first two and went 13-for-14 on the last:  the last two
bets both paid off at better than 100:1.

How can he blow the lead?  It'd be tough: he'd have to put down large wagers
and get less than half his picks right consistantly.  On the other hand,
though, the rest of the people in pool are still _very_ actively competing
for places in the rest of the top ten.. And there's always the chance that
lightning will strike twice.

I'll email the full set of instructions on the pool to you..  Also, to anyone
else interested:  send mail to the reply address of this message and you
can join in also..
From: joel@cs.utexas.edu (Joel Daniel Just)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dallas roster *iced* listing
Date: 11 Oct 1992 00:17:37 -0500
Organization: U Texas Dept of Computer Sciences, Austin TX
NNTP-Posting-Host: langtry.cs.utexas.edu


In article <1b75gkINNrbv@news.aero.org> mas@aero.org (Marcus A.Shaw) writes:
>...
> 7   Steve Beuerlein     QB   6-2  209  27   5    T    has not plyd

Steve Beuerlein has been the holder for placekicks this year, and he played the
"try to get Philly to jump offisides or call timeout" role in the Eagles game.

>...

And what else does KMart have to do to prove to Jimmy Johnson that he is the
second best wide receiver on the Cowboys roster?  He should have been
starting all of last year and this year.  As I recall, his number of catches
has compared well with Harper's, both last year and this year, despite
Martin's losing his starting job to Harper.

And after seeing Martin return kickoffs against the Eagles, I'd like to see
him be one of the kick returners on every kick, besides just punts.

-Joel


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kayuucee@cvl.umd.edu (Kenneth W. Crist Jr.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: We ARE Part of the team (was Re: HAIL THE BROWNS)
Date: 15 Oct 92 14:23:12 GMT
Organization: Center for Automation Research, Univ. of Md.

In article <1992Oct15.133428.2293@daffy.cs.wisc.edu>, jeffr@ssec.wisc.edu (Jeff Ramin) writes:
> In article <Adriene.82.0@Yale.EDU>, Adriene@Yale.EDU (Adriene Nazaretian - GO GIANTS) writes:

> |> We help psych the team up, we are there for them, as much as they are 
> |> for us.
> 
> Do you really think Lawrence Taylor or Phil Simms gets psyched up during the
> game thinking about you sitting at home in front of your tv?  If you do,
> you're living in a fantasy world.  

	Sorry, but I've been to RFK on several occasions when the fans have
had an effect on the Redskins. We do psyche them up. That place get rocking
when the fans get going. One recent example, last year's playoff games against
the Atlanta Falcons and the Detroit Lions.
	Fans also have an effect on opponents. It's called home field
advantage. It doesn't just mean that fans get so loud that recievers can't
hear the signals, it can also be a morale deflater. Earlier this year when
Matt Millen was doing color for a Redskins game on CBS he talked about playing
in RFK and about the song 'Hail To The Redskins' which is played after
every score. Millen said something along the lines of, "I played a few games
here against the Redskins when the fans started that song. I hated that
song." He probably changed his mind a little last year!
	Finally, fans who go out and greet teams at airports after a lose in
the playoffs or the Super Bowl have an effect also. They restore the spirit
of the players who have just suffered a failure in their chosen profession.
	So, maybe they don't think about the fans at home, but the fans in the
stands have an effect.

						Ken Crist
From: fraser@cisco.com (Sean Fraser)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Predictions, anyone?
Date: 9 Oct 1992 03:50:36 GMT
Organization: cisco Systems, Incorporated
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: stout.cisco.com

In article <BvHy7F.914@acsu.buffalo.edu>, v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (JONNY B. GOODE) writes:
|> In article <27000111@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>, boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell) writes...
|> >Eagles vs Bills
|> 
|> 
|> 	Useless post.  Really.
|> 
|> Jonny B.


Jonny,
 	Here my .02c for what it is worth.  I think if the eagles play the way they did against dallas monday night then buffalo better do some heavy praying if they expect to win.  Buffalo can't afford to lose this game though since miami is already on top.  

						Frase Man

PS- I'm a 49er fan:-)

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: vito@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (daniel.b.vought)
Subject: Re: CUT BRUCE LOOOOOOOOOOOSE!!!!!!!!! NOT!  
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 21:10:57 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.143724.1723@webo.dg.com> greg@puck.webo.dg.com writes:
>Coslet must go, at the end of the season to give him a fair chance,
>his offense does NOT work, the plays take too long to run, that is why
>Nagle looks like he is always under pressure, I believe his offense 
>worked with Cincy because he had to filter it through Wyche.
>I never see them throwing screen passes or especially GOING DOWNFIELD!!!
>All they throw are these intermediate passes that the defense picks up
>on eventually and that's all they cover, I thought the defense played
>extrememly well for being on the field as long as they were.
>They never try to sustain the running game, as soon as there is one 
>bad play they abandon it, and they don't leave running backs in the
>game either. I AM SICK OF THIS (*%*$#@*. They shouldn't make the same
>mistake they made with Walton, don't wait 'till seven years of
>suffering, coslet must go, CUT BRUCE LOOSE,
>
>Greg 
>
>J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
>

    Well I haven't said anything in 6 weeks but it has to come out,
 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!
 WWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!! the jests fuckin suck !  I mean they really
 suck! no wait the Giants suck. words can't describe how dissapointing
 the jests are.

  Well now that I got that off my chest I can be more objective.

  The O-line is the root of most of the offensive problems. lots of missed 
  assignments,holding,negitive yards on running plays and the worst part
  Nagle throwing under pressure. Nagle's arm is so strong when he's pressured
  on a throw he putts way to much zip on it and it is too hard to catch.
  
  Blair Thomas sucks i can't believe they took this guy over E.Smith and
  Hampton he has 3 100 yard games and he has fumblitis and if he does bust
  one for 20 holding brings it back. 

  Johnny Mitchell catches 1 pass dislocates his shoulder and is out for 7
  weeks just what we needed. So now they throw to Boyer this guy couldn't
  catch a fuckin cold never mind a football.

  The recievers are great but they are dropping way to many balls maybe 
  they are not used to the velocity the ball comes in at.

  Defense hey whats this arm tackeling shit! Nobody is finishing the 
  tackle thats why their on the field so long. How can you let the Clots
  mount a 70 yard drive on you?


    Heartbreakers

   Oh well                        goooooooooooooooooooooo  JETS 

                                      KICK BUFFALO ASS!

   DANIEL V  (I will stand by the JETS )   (plenty of seats on the bandwagon)
From: david@cats.ucsc.edu (David Wright)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: STATUS OF MONTANA...
Date: 13 Oct 1992 17:45:39 GMT
Organization: University of California; Santa Cruz
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: si.ucsc.edu


In article <1992Oct13.162334.19772@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
|In article <1992Oct13.024108.11176@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com|, marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com (Bob Marshall) writes...
|
||In article <1992Oct12.230426.20993@sequent.com|, patrick@sequent.com (Patrick Roddy) writes:
|||I am interested in finding out whether the Niners plan to continue
|||with Young at QB if Montana is ready to come in. As much as I worship
|||Montana, I am suspect on messing with a winning package. Is Montana
|||ready to come off of IR, or will he remain for a couple more weeks.
|||Looking forward to watching the Niners in mid January.
|| 
||Montana's status has not changed. It seems like the 49ers' management is
||hardly even keeping up with his status. Carmen Policy was asked when
||Montana was supposed to start throwing again, and his response was "I
||think he's supposed to start throwing yesterday or tomorrow". And
||Seifert regularly says "I don't know if he's been throwing or not".
||I think the picture is clear; Montana is not coming back this year,
||certainly as long as they keep winning with Young (even as difficult as
||he has made it to do so).
|
|According to the Associated Press Montana hasn't thrown since 
|September 26.  Since then he's had numbness in the hand and his 
|doctors told him not to throw.
|

Face it: he's history.
-- 
"There is nothing in the marginal conditions that     
    distinguish a mountain from a mole hill"            
                      Kenneth Boulding                             

					All comments  are mine---(David Wright) 
						david@cats.ucsc.edu.
From: un032221@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: John Elway's Comebacks.
Date: 15 Oct 92 04:42:12 GMT
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <21000@plains.NoDak.edu>, sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan ) writes:
> After seeing yet another comeback by Elway against the Chiefs
> at Mile-High, I have a question.
> 
> Has Elway's Comeback victims ever included any strong NFC teams
> or is it that Elway has succeeded only againt the AFC in his
> comebacks. If he is indeed a great QB, then why has he not
> comeback against the NFC teams in the Super-Bowl.
> 
> I bet that Elway is just an average QB.
> 
> S.H

No, he is a GREAT QB on an average team, that at it's peak was mildly above
average.  W/O Elway, Reeves would have lost his job LONG ago.  Reeves is like
Levy, he just sits on the sideline, and looks important.
	-Skins fan that has just one thing to say: "WAY TO GO MONK!!!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gilford@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Gilford T. Hapanyengwi)
Subject: Skins-Broncos
Organization: Vanderbilt University CS Dept.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 04:59:37 GMT

Skins win 34-3.  Denver was never in the game.
Art Monk becomes the career reception leader in the history of the
NFL.

Cheers,

--
<><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><<>><>
Gilford T. Hapanyengwi       |To avoid lying, do not tell
(615) 322-3552               |the whole truth.
gilford@vuse.vanderbilt.edu  |
hapanyg@vuctrvax.bitnet      |
From: gt6390a@prism.gatech.EDU (BERNSTEIN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: 4 team divisions
Keywords: best team ever?
Date: 15 Oct 92 08:31:19 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


I really don't think that the fact that there are/were only 4 teams in those
divisions matters.  They still had to play the same # of regular season games
as the other teams.  They still had to play in the playoffs.  They still had to
win the Super Bowl (4 times).  They still had to play other teams in their 
conference, as well as the other one.  I guess the argument is that with only
4 teams, they had an easier team than a comparably equal team would in a five
team division.  Well, the Dallas Cowboy teams of the 70's were AWESOME, and
they were in a five team division.  Yet, when they played Pittsburgh, the 
Steelers were able to come away with a win.  It was DAMN close, mind you, but
a win nonetheless.  I would contribute all this more to the fact that Pittsburgh
and Dallas were miles beyond everyone else during that time.  If Pittsburgh
hadn't have been that good, Dallas would certainly have won those SB's.  But
as for the 4 team thing, I disagree.
-- 
BERNSTEIN,AVRON P
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt6390a
Internet: gt6390a@prism.gatech.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: wyborsr@wl.com (Russ Wyborski)
Subject: Re: Lions at Vikings tonight (Thurs.)?
Organization: Warner Lambert / Parke-Davis
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 20:02:51 GMT

In article <ld88orINN6m0@cronkite> nate@ghidrah.Central.Sun.COM writes:
>In article 1996@hubcap.clemson.edu, cowboy@hubcap.clemson.edu (Greg Barron) writes:
>>Detroit is scheduled to play the Vikings at the Metrodome
>>tonight (7:30 p.m. EST, TNT). Both teams were scheduled for
>>a bye this week in the week-by-week listing I got back in
>>July. Why the change? I must've been out to lunch when the
>>game was moved.
>
>I'm here in Michigan and I am not aware that it has been changed.  I beleive
>the game is scheduled for 15 Oct and it has not been changed.  Maybe you just
>got your weeks crossed.
>
>nate
>
>>>Actually, the Lions offense was hoping to play tonight while the Vikings
>>>were at home. This would give them a better chance of getting some first
>>>downs & points.



--
From: f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: NFL_1992 Scoreboard: Standings
Date: 13 Oct 92 06:12:04 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of Arizona
Nntp-Posting-User: f67700241

Here are the NFL standings, as reproduced by the computer program.
===




                       AFC Standings


      AFC West          Season      Home       Away  
      -------------     W- L- T    W- L- T    W- L- T

      Denver            4- 2- 0    3- 0- 0    1- 2- 0
      Kansas City       4- 2- 0    3- 0- 0    1- 2- 0
      L.A. Raiders      2- 4- 0    2- 1- 0    0- 3- 0
      San Diego         1- 4- 0    1- 2- 0    0- 2- 0
      Seattle           1- 5- 0    0- 2- 0    1- 3- 0


      AFC Central       Season      Home       Away  
      -------------     W- L- T    W- L- T    W- L- T

      Houston           4- 1- 0    2- 1- 0    2- 0- 0
      Pittsburgh        3- 2- 0    1- 0- 0    2- 2- 0
      Cincinnati        2- 3- 0    1- 2- 0    1- 1- 0
      Cleveland         2- 3- 0    1- 2- 0    1- 1- 0


      AFC East          Season      Home       Away  
      -------------     W- L- T    W- L- T    W- L- T

      Miami             5- 0- 0    2- 0- 0    3- 0- 0
      Buffalo           4- 2- 0    2- 1- 0    2- 1- 0
      Indianapolis      3- 2- 0    2- 1- 0    1- 1- 0
      N.Y. Jets         1- 5- 0    1- 1- 0    0- 4- 0
      New England       0- 5- 0    0- 3- 0    0- 2- 0



                       NFC Standings


      NFC West          Season      Home       Away  
      -------------     W- L- T    W- L- T    W- L- T

      San Francisco     5- 1- 0    1- 1- 0    4- 0- 0
      New Orleans       4- 2- 0    2- 1- 0    2- 1- 0
      Atlanta           2- 4- 0    2- 1- 0    0- 3- 0
      L.A. Rams         2- 4- 0    2- 0- 0    0- 4- 0


      NFC Central       Season      Home       Away  
      -------------     W- L- T    W- L- T    W- L- T

      Minnesota         4- 1- 0    2- 0- 0    2- 1- 0
      Tampa Bay         3- 2- 0    2- 1- 0    1- 1- 0
      Green Bay         2- 3- 0    2- 1- 0    0- 2- 0
      Chicago           2- 3- 0    2- 1- 0    0- 2- 0
      Detroit           1- 4- 0    1- 2- 0    0- 2- 0


      NFC East          Season      Home       Away  
      -------------     W- L- T    W- L- T    W- L- T

      Philadelphia      4- 1- 0    3- 0- 0    1- 1- 0
      Dallas            4- 1- 0    3- 0- 0    1- 1- 0
      Washington        3- 2- 0    3- 0- 0    0- 2- 0
      N.Y. Giants       2- 3- 0    1- 2- 0    1- 1- 0
      Phoenix           1- 4- 0    1- 1- 0    0- 3- 0
-- 
Greg "Mockingbird" Franklin      Interviewer: "Sir, how do you spell relief?"
f67700241@ccit.arizona.edu               Dan: "R-O-L-A-I-D-S-E."

"[George Bush is] the most ruthless white man in the history of the planet."
	-- Richard Ben Cramer, author of _What It Takes_
"The President scores much better than Bill Clinton."
	-- Dan, comparing Bush's record of marital infidelity to Clinton's
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Revenge week? 
From: jacobs@cerritos.edu
Date: 7 Oct 92 21:20:03 PST
Organization: Cerritos College, Norwalk CA

In article <1992Oct07.130544.5432@bnr.ca>, reams@crchh462.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Cary Reams) writes:
> In article <1992Oct07.120601.4414@bnr.ca>, jeffh@crchh317.BNR.CA (Jeff Hammond) writes:
> |> 	Since what were considered two of the top teams got blown
> |> out last week (Bills & cowboys), does anybody feel sorry for the
> |> raiders or seahawks? Who do the bears play? How do raiders & seahawk
> |> fan's feel?
> |> 	Just some idle musings while trying out new posting sw.
> |> 
> |> 
> 
> Bears, Lions, The Bays, Vikes and Chargers have an open date
> this weekend. 
> 
> Chargers are going to lose all that momentum.
> 
	Well as far as us Raider fans are concerned, we hope that Lott has seen
the film of Kelly's FOUR interceptions and is smacking his lips and getting
ready to party! Todd is starting to come around and I just hope that he doesn't
get hurt otherwise we'll be left with that S- guy again. (I wonder if S.F.
would be interested it trading Bono?)

Please Buffalo, continue to flounder for one more weak!

Karl 
 
________________________________________________________________________________Karl Jacobs - Jacobs@cerritos.edu
From: un032221@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles : YIKES!
Date: 15 Oct 92 04:42:15 GMT
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <1992Oct8.030847.19011@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
> In article <1992Oct7.233253.7349@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com> marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com writes:
>>In article <1992Oct7.203035.20790@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria) writes:
>>
>>John, first you said :
>>
>>>Again, stats do not mean squat shit on Sunday. Do you
>>>understand that concept?
>>
>>Then you said :
>>
>>>Statistics as applied to the game of football do not mean squat shit.
>>
>>And finally you said :
>>
>>>Coach Seifert, currently has the highest winning perctange of any coach.
>>
>>I'm not sure this is even true, but even if it is, I guess it doesn't
>>mean squat shit, right?
>>
>>=============================================================================
>>Bob Marshall                     \\     "It ain't age
>>Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.     \\     That makes me look this way
>>Sunnyvale, CA                      \\    It ain't the years, boys,
>>marshall@force.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com\\   It's the miles"
>>"I tell the truth 'cept when I lie"  \\     - Chris LeDoux
>>=============================================================================
> 
> Ahh, finally a netter that is SHARP. I threw that in there
> just to see who would catch it. Congrats.! BTW, this tidit about
> Seifert was shown on t.v. last week.
> -- 
>   ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
>   Let us be thankful for the fools; but for them the rest
>   of us could not succeed.  -   Mark Twain

Bullshit.  You fucked up, and are covering your tracks.  Plus, remember Siefert
took over a dynasty team, and really is not deserving of full credit for the
team's success, though he does deserve some credit for keeping them from
falling any faster than they are.
	-Skins fan that has just one thing to say: "WAY TO GO MONK!!!"
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: The most underrated quarterback in my lifetime
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 22:08:26 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

>   This would only be because the executives on NFL Live know true talent  
> when they see it, as Elway is the greatest comeback Quarterback of all time.

            You should know you're gonna get some responses to this claim.
In my own biased opinion I think Elway is no better than 3rd. I've been a
football fan since '77, so of the ones I have seen:

                                 1. Roger the Doger
                                 2. Dan THE Man Marino
                                 3. John "in the championship I go the" L-way

                                  -doug THE dolfan-

> This message comes from the computer of the brilliant, witty, and
> astonishingly good-looking Sam ("Lub","The Lubser","Slammin' Sammy",
> "Mule") Lubchansky.  If you didn't want me to send this to you,
> THAT SUCKS FOR YOU !!!!!!       PHI KAPPA PSI RULES!!!!!!!

                                 I could have lived without it


                                          -doug THE dolfan-
                                                           
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: wkirkpat@javelin.sim.es.com (WCK)
Subject: Re: HAIL THE BROWNS
Reply-To: wkirkpat@javelin.sim.es.com
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 20:57:29 GMT

jeffr@ssec.wisc.edu (Jeff Ramin) writes:


>In article <dn2001-131092152526@m248-103.bgsu.edu>, dn2001@andy.bgsu.edu (Dan Nolan) writes:
>|> THE BROWNS RULE!!!!!!!!!!
>|> 
>|> THAT'S ALL AND NOTHING ELSE.
>|> 
>|> GREENBAY DOESN'T STAND A CHANCE AGAINST US.
>                                           ^^

>Are you a member of the team?  There's very few things more annoying than fans
>using the term "us" instead of "them".  Occasionally, I'll even hear a very
>poor broadcaster doing this.

>As far as the Browns ruling anything: you appear to be the second coming of
>Mr Caps Locked except worse - at least the Eagles can usually deliver on their
>fans' foolish pre-game woofing.
 
ya the eagles play allright unless the CHIEFS are on the feild
  >> VOTE DAVE KRIEG FOR GOD >>  
-- 
"If we do not succeed, then we run the risk of failure"..V.P Dan Quayle....... 
 Let me say I am some say anyway a vary poor speller, I know what you are..... 
thinking,gee I hardly noticed but its true....|\\w//|.........................
.............OWNER..GRAVE DIGGERS.............................................
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: cl129424@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Re: Request: Highest Score in NFL history 
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 23:43:13 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <1992Oct15.140324.8731@seq.uncwil.edu>, rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu (Ross Smith) writes:
> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.YCC.YALE.EDU (ALN - GO GIANTS) writes:
> 
>>Looking for the team with the highest scoring game in NFL history, date, 
>>place, etc...
> 
>>Thanks in Advance
> 
>>Adriene L. Nazaretian
> 
> Your Giants got beat in the highest scoring NFL game of all time 72-41
> in NY by the 'Skins on Nov 27 1966.
> 
> The 72 points by Washington is also the highest number of points scored
> in a single game by any team in NFL history.
> 
> The next highest scoring game was a 52-49 Oakland win at Houston Dec 22 1963
> 
> enough for ya?
> -- 
                  If I'm not mistaken this would have been an AFL game.
I guess this is considered part of the NFL records.

                                          -doug THE dolfan-
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> |rsmith@seq.uncwil.edu           Ross Smith              smith@oscar.udel.edu|
> |    "I really hate that dog...." - Dr. Chase Matthews, Pet Semetary 2       |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro