HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Mark B.
Subject: The Truth About Walsh's .sig (was Re: A Day in the life of: Rob Dobson)
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 19:51:34 GMT


In article <B110N1G@math.fu-berlin.de> John G. Robinson <robinson@psyvax.psy.utexas.edu> writes:
>
>Why, all he'd have to do is cross the briny to that floating turd
>they call england and he could land a job as a "professor" just
>like you did.  God knows the job requirements can't be that tough
>if they'd take on a compulsive masturbator such as yourself.
>
>>-- 
>>   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
>>  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     Professor
>Kevin Walsh
>> _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/     
>kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
>>_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/      
>kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
>
>Nice .sig, prof.


Actually, he stole it from this enlightened person...


>Hey, to whoever is out there, please email me your very best dorm pranks. 
>I'll compile a list and post it later

        __/__/__/__/  __/__/__/__/ __/__/__/__/
       __/                 __/    __/
      __/   __/__/        __/    __/   __/__/
     __/      __/  __/   __/    __/      __/
    __/__/__/__/  __/__/__/    __/__/__/__/
                gjg2001@andy.bgsu.edu
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 03:57:48 GMT

liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:

>In article <C136Gx.K44@world.std.com> rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama) writes:
>>In article <1jdgq1INN6qc@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@leibniz.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>>>Nobody said you couldn't.  And if you think you have seen male-bashing,
>>>you're sadly mistaken.  I have yet to throw the big punches.
>>
>>So, throw some, Liz.  

>Why?  To prove to some stupid wench that I've never even met that I have the
>capability to do it?  Please.  I have better things to do with my time.

It never ceases to amaze me how people can sit and type a long explanation
of why they don't have the time to actually type a couple of sentences that
would have proven their point anyway.

Could it be....the gun is cocked, but the chamber is empty?

Equally good:  People who take the time to respond to an article explaining
why that article is not worth their time to respond to.

>>God knows it would be a change from the sissy prattle you dish
>>out here day after day.

>Killfile.  

It's a device whereby you can be spared the embarassment of seeing certain
subject lines or poster's names.  Try and get one of the adults to help
you make one.

>Duh.  What an ignorant slut.

There, there, dear.  Low self esteem is unhealthy.  Perhaps you should
see a therapist about this?

>					--Liz

                 -rocker
From: sperdomo@samson.hac.com (Sanin Perdomo)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Civilain slime invades net, Rob "fat-ass"
Date: 21 Jan 93 18:03:12 GMT
Reply-To: sperdomo@samson.hac.com
Organization: Hughes Training Incorporated, WCO


> > In article <1993Jan16.081804.13691@bsu-ucs> 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:

> [Other nonsense deleted]
> Instead I would rather become an officer and uphold freedom
> for a few years after graduation. Its a fair exchange. 

My sources tell me that after graduation, SHITTY will not be an Infantry Officer but rather an Admin. Officer.  Upon graduation, SHITTY will attend Jeep driving  school where he will learn to keep one hand on the steering wheel while fondling the General's balls with the other.  After completion of this course, his duties will include making sure all military female personnel have enough tampons; all restrooms are properly cleansed; and scrubbing the general down twice a day. 

-cosmic


P.S. Let me help you with a new sig:

> JEFF SHITTY
> ARMY R.O.T.C. (Leave this in -- makes you look moronic already)
> a.k.a. PROUD JEEP DRIVER/PENCIL PUSHER OF THE US ARMY

There, much better don't you think?


Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: haushalt@research.nj.nec.com (Robert C.Haushalter)
Subject: Vinnie you are a stupid fuckwit
Originator: haushalt@shakti
Organization: NEC Research Institute
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 18:40:56 GMT

On Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:30:54 GMT Vinnie, after selectively deleting the 
strong arguements he can't refute, vainly argues:

Me:
>>I guess you prefer the "borrow and spend" policies of the last two losers
>>reagan and bush?  And please don't come up with that infantile 
>>:arguement that "congress approves all spoending" crap that you fascists 
>>are so fond of.

Vinnie:
>Your obvious ineptitude of government is obscene. Presidents don't 
>merely just sign you stupid ass. Legislation is often laiden with other 
>comprimises that a president must sign in order to keep the government 
>moving. To simply blame *just* the president is total, and complete 
>ignorance.

Do you have dyslexia Vinnie?  I Bush said must have signed and the 
republicans in congress failed to veto _any_ law that's passed.  It was bad 
enough to listen to bush whine about "boo hoo sob, the democrats _made_ 
me do it" but now we have to listen to you whine too.  No wonder he'll go 
done in history as a wimpy assed reactionary.

>>You like your governement subsidy, right.? . . it's just the poor guy that 
>>shouldn't get one, you fucking hypocrite.  How about government 
>>backed student loans?  In fact, I bet your stinking right wing ass right 
>>now is being supported on some sort of government scholarship, loan or 
>>subsidy.

>True, I am receiving about $16,000 to come to school here, all in
>scholarships. I don't think that paying someone to get a college education 
>is evil at all, nor do I espouce that theory.

I rest my case you shit-for-brains right wing fuckwad.  You're perfectly 
happy on the government dole aren't you?

>Just because you were too much of a glue sniffing, greasy scab in high 
>school and couldn't GET a full ride, besides whatever your mother could 
>do, don't try to bring it down on me, ok? BTW, how much do you leech 
>off of society in your little "research" hmm? 

Vinnie, I guess for a guy that couldn't keep Hannigan from "outing" him 
you wouldn't realize that the .com in my address means I've got a job and, 
unlike you, actually work for a living.  If I worked for the government I 
would have a .gov on my address.  For your information I was on a 
schloarship the whole time I was obtaining my Ph.D. in chemistry at the 
Univ. of Michigan (which was probably a little harder than a degree in 
blow jobs from cornhole university in the middle of iowa).

>How much is the government paying you to read alt.flame?

You stupid dog flatulence.  IT'S .COM!  I work and pay taxes so you can 
get a schlarship to post to alt.flame creep.
-- 
The opinions are mine..not my company's.
Actually, everything is more complicated
From: mel@maddog.ece.nd.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Mel, theme songs, the Beverly Hillbillys, and Mel's prose
Date: 28 Jan 93 00:28:56 GMT
Reply-To: mel@maddog.ece.nd.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame

In article <16060149@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com>, tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:
>One of the better ones!  ha ha ha 

I'm sure it wasn't, but unfortunately I didn't get to
see it.  Our news server was dead last Friday.  Perhaps
it barfed on Andy's post.

>good one andy.

Hey, did Andy show you his scrotum?

Melvin M. Gladstone
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan)
Subject: Re: ADMISSION. [was : Spineless michele etc]
Summary: Tm c 
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 05:52:23 GMT

In article <932125142135@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk> STUCS204@IBM3090.BHAM.AC.UK (Richard Thomas) writes:
>==============================================================================
>Well we finally have an admission from the prize moron...
>
>[much infighting between Mona and Michel(l)e deleted - usual reasons]
>and then Michel(l)e "I am soooooooooooo butch" D'allagamincer says
>
>"And I tell you something else: On my university, and HERE at FAGLAB, I have al
>ways been considered the most MACHO and one of the most FUNNY LIKEABLE GUY. Don
>'t be confused. Macho doed not mean shit."
>
>What can be said about that then? The rumour has been confirmed by the horses m
>outh himself. He is still at FAGLAB. Hold on he called it faglab. GASP. Another
> admission from our normally butch boy. He was considered the most macho and fu


FagLab (tm) (c) 1992 Martin J. Hannigan All Rights Reserved
^^^^^^

Another old time favorite engineered in Kendall Square Cambridge.


 = Martin Hannigan =
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: a misunderstood apology
Date: 25 Jan 93 12:06:44 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <35786@olympus.wustl.edu>, moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
> Ok: let's make it plain for Michele, Jason and all the other people who
> misunderstood my apology.

I didn't misunderstand anything, my dear. The problem is 
that to apologize, in alt.flame, is stupid.

[Classical Moana 1000 lines deleted]
> 
> 6) Before writing, here in alt.flame a *lot* of people has to learn how
>    to read. Michele, you're the first.

Camon, my sweet Moana. What the fuck? Don't feel upset with 
me, my baby. I wanted only to have fun of you. Don't get it 
too much seriously.
> 
> Sincerely fuck you all.

HAAAAAAAAARRRGHHH. Again! You speak like a macho! 
Tsk, tsk, tsk, tsk. I hope that you will *not* apologize, now.
> 
> Moana.

  Take it easy, sweetheart

	Michele
From: Kevin Walsh <kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Sadness (Moaner moans on and on and on and on and.....)
Date: 26 Jan 93 13:08:37 GMT
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England

In article <35770@oilypuss.wustl.edu> moaner@darla.wustl.edu (Moaner Lombardi) writes:
> But there will be the time in which the Brits will stop to look at themselves
> as the owners of the truth? 
>
Damn!  You're right.  Only the other day, I stopped to look at myself
and thought, "Kevin, you're the owner of the truth!  No, more than
that, you're a fucking net.evangelist and purveyor of fine net.clues."

>
>   "We are intellingent, we are smart, we are the best ..."
>
Too right!  (You could invest in a spell checker though - or a net.life)

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     Professor Kevin Walsh
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/       kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 22:15:33 GMT
Subject: Re: FUCKIG SHOUITES
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: alt.flame

OK, its now jan27 and no one else has asked John S. Graley what the 
hell a "shouite" is....  


How the hell are we supposed to know who or what you are trying to insult
John, if you spew incoherent crap like this?  Is this word a local 
thing, like "agro, man" or "bio, dude!!!" 

Are you fucking "Jones'ed", or what?       


					      
PISS OFF, GRALEY you shouite!  

YOU SHOUITE!  SHOUITE YOU!  EAT SHOUITE! 

shouite off and die, J.S.
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Blinded by love; Jism and J S Graley
Date: 24 Jan 93 09:00:15 GMT
Organization: A Real Job

01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim) writes:
>
>[Jim's semen deleted]
>
>> Do you base your decision on who is "Euro-scum" solely upon where they work?
>> I work in the UK (Sussex, to be precise) and I may or may not be British. It
>> doesn't matter and I don't care but what makes *you* so sure I'm a Brit?
>> 
> [tittering deleted]  ...You haven't
>been here on the net long enough to understand our flame war. Take time,
>sit back and use your mind, sort thinks out, ask questions. 
>
>JEFF WITTY
>ARMY R.O.T.C.
>a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY


This is rich.  Twitty, the ROTC college freshman brat talking down to Jim 
who works for a living:  "...haven't been on the net long enough...".

BWA HA HA HAHHA HHAAAA HAAA!

-- Andy
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Date: 27 Jan 1993 18:22:04 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <35945@olympus.wustl.edu> moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:
|(Mr J S Graley) *dictates*:
|>
|>Read and learn, bitch. [...] If you wish to flame with the master, 
|>(THE GREAT NAME), you will have to improve your quality, as the crap you post
|>currently is just a waste of bandwidth.
|
|I bet that also the Brits themselves are ashamed for your frustrating 
|arrogance. 
|
|Comparing to your spews, the lames of professor Kebbin Blather Walsh are 
|absolutely outstanding.

Really? What does a FUCKING WOP know about flaming? FUCKING NOTHING.

You should realise your place, moaner. You are a sad little person wanting 
a piece of the alt.flame action. Your posts are virtually incomprehensible,
and even when one does work out what you are going on about, it turns out
to be lame crap. 

~THE GREAT NAME 
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: TWITTY: IDIOT OR IDIOT - YOU DECIDE
Followup-To: alt.flame, alt.homo
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 08:34:55 GMT

In article <C1AI1v.Jpy@world.std.com>, martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan) writes:

> Let's start here. Defintion: Loser who entered Military Academy after his
> parents blew a US Congressman. Afterwards, Twittys mom, Mrs. Twitty, also
> handled the congressional staffers. Alas, of Twitty Jr. goes.

This is starting to get annoying... can't you *ever* come up with *anything*
original? Let's start wih a working definition of creativity. This "Twitty" bit
and the acyronyms are all very old. Hannigan, you are about as dry as they
come. You are boring, and predictable. The most meaningful "flame war" that
could ever possible evolve with your pathetic attempt at rhetorical humor would
be a battle to the death between yourself and Michele. Touche my little pussy
cat!
 
> Army? I'd be embarassed to admit that son. Army is what you join if you're
> too much of a puss to enter the Marines or Navy Officer Program.

Yeah... try telling that to some Vietnam vets while you're in a bar sometime,
that is, if you were old enough to get into a bar. I realize that not having
any pubic hair complication is hard to get around, but I know some people that
make really good fakes if you care to take me up on that. I wish you luck in
trying to eek out whatever dead end existance you may have left in your
underachieving NonLife. Welcome to reality, it a cold place for moronic
assholes like yourself.

Hugs and kisses,

--The Phantom
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: FAMOUS FLAMES
Date: 24 Jan 93 08:51:51 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

julie.larson@filebank.cts.com (Julie Larson) writes:
>Has anyone out there compiled a compendium of noteworthy flames and
>snappy comebacks?

You'll have to ask keegan.  He's chief compiler and Keeper of Compendiums.

Just ask for "archive-boy".

-- Andy
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: jason
Date: 25 Jan 93 13:38:34 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <1993Jan25.172525.5020@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>  jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>  (pages and pages and pages and pages and pages of boring, poorly
>   edited arguments with michele)
> 
> you bore me, son. really. if you must continue this little lovers spat,
> take it to email; no one but you and dell a gata are readings this tripe
> anyway.

You see, Jason? I wanted to avoid this, I know that the alt.flame 
people don't like *very* long posts. But you wanted me 
to be serious...

Anyway, Thank you my soldiers! You will have your reward!
I will fucking flame you more and more!

He, he, he, he.... JASON, YOU LOST!

	Michele
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Summary: I become a slaver and attempt to buy Katherine for evil purposes
Keywords: O-> !@#$%#!! +-O
Date: 24 Jan 93 08:15:25 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

(Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>>And your insistence that they are NOT says much about your complete
>>and total schism from reality.  Just exactly what do you deduce about 
>>my social life from this quote?
>
>Did I insist that most women are not for sale.  I am not most women, so
>I cannot speak for them.  You could not set a price high enough to 
>buy me, or almost anyone I know.  This, I suppose says something about
>the people I know.  The fact that you can buy (and I don't doubt that
>you can) most women you have run into, says something about where you
>are running.  Or that you are so sure perhaps says something about
>you having bought many women.  Perhaps you couldn't find any that were
>interested.

Before I make an offer, I generally prefer to inspect the merchandise.
'Scuse me, but I never said that I had *bought* any women, only that most 
were for sale.  Please read carefully, next time.  Well, I did buy Walsh's 
mother once, but that was the only time.  Honest.  Oh, and I found one
last night who was "interested".

>>Now, Kate, let me just say most men and women are alike in that we seek
>>some imaginary combination of characteristics that we believe an *ideal* 
>>mate to possess.
>
>Kate, huh?  Okay, whatever you say Andrew.

Well, if I'm going to try to *buy* you, we might as well be informal.

>>In general, I find women to be more materialistic.  Are you saying this
>>is not true?
>
>No.  I cannot confirm or deny what is true about the woman you know.  All
>I can say is that you must know some pretty sleezy women.  No wonder
>you were discussing the emotional results of being dumped with Liz.

Does knowing Patrica O Tuama count?  She's seems kinda sleazy.  
And I wasn't "dumped".  The relationships hadn't progressed to the point
where anyone could be dumped.

>I wish you better luck in the future.
>Happy Chinese New Year,

Thanks.  What's your phone number?  
Would you consider taking credit cards? 


-- Andy  (What does "Ne Oublie" *mean* anyway?)
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Phantom's secret revealed
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:06:26 GMT
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.


                    Proceedings- Captain's Mast
		    26 Jan 93  U.S.S. Orleck DD-27

		    Cmdr Lloyd Bucher, Commanding

COMNAVAIRPAC, San Diego
12-4452-887   APOW


Defendant:  Goddard, Vinson Scott  
Rank: Boatswain's Mate 3rd Class

Executive Officer: D'Allagatta, Michele
		   Liaison, Italian Navy



Exec's Statement:

"I came on watch at 2200 hours. Proceeded to the bridge to exchange watch
with OOD. On the way up I noticed suspicious behavior on the part of the
boatswain's mate. At first, I could not clearly see what was going on, 
as the smoking lamp was on, and upon exiting the superstructure the 
darkness kept me from seeing for several minutes. What caught my attention
was the fact that there appeared to be several men on deck engaged in
some sort of perverted sex act.  There is no reason for anyone to be on
deck at this time, and I slipped behind the ASROC structure to observe
and listen until my eyesight adjusted.  After several minutes, I then 
observed boatswain's mate Goddard on his knees fellating another sailor
on deck. Several others were gathered around, possibly awaiting their 
turn. I cannot recall actually seeing that it was the boatswain's mate,
the darkness prevented that, but all involved were referring to "Phantom
which is, I understand, the boatswain's mate's nickname.  This went
on for several minutes until I was sure of the identity of most involved
and confronted the group.  All immediately scattered below decks, except
for the boatswain's mate. He apparently was still pulling up his pants
and unable to run. I then informed the sailor of the fact that he was
to immediately report to the bridge whereupon I informed the Captain
of the charges to be brought forth."


Defendant's Statement:

"I didn't do it, nobody saw me, you can't prove it!"




all disclaimers apply, executed 26 Jan 93
COMNAVAIRPAC
From: cress@chester.ksu.ksu.edu (Garrett C Cress)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This place is getting boring.
Date: 21 Jan 1993 08:16:12 -0600
Organization: Kansas State University
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: chester.ksu.ksu.edu


In article <1993Jan21.111044.9115@ericsson.se>, etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim) writes:
>
>
>Hey Andy, you polyp!  Some people enjoy noshing on some good, wholesome
>sickness.  Full of protein and vitamins.  You should try some nice juicy
>chunks of stomach lining before giving Walsh some hassle.  You just can't
>beat the acrid taste of viscous bile slopping over your tongue, mmm.  I
>like to slurp up the bilious liquid with a straw so I can get at the soft
>cubes of vomit with a cocktail stick...see you in alt.fondle.vomit.
>
>Jim.

Come to think of it, you *do* post to alt.tasteless on a regular
basis don't you.

Garrett
From: tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Republican Losers
Date: 26 Jan 93 17:17:49 GMT
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.

The Phantom is an Un-American, Constitution shredding, military coup conspiring
Facsist son of a bitch.

He would like to overthrow the government of the United States, I'm sure to 
save us from the "L" people.

You sorry sack of shit...its your turn to cringe, eh?

Fack off and die Right Wing Hitler idolizing KKK Republican SCUM.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Subject: Re: This place is getting boring.
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 02:33:11 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <C0yz67.1HI@cursor.demon.co.uk> Kevin Walsh <kevin@cursor.demon.co.uk> writes:
>In article <C0s1wu.Bvp@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy YeeeeeeeHart) writes:
>> 
>> Listen closely, Jim:    omm Ooom* mm mmm mmuuwbwaaahhhhgggg kkk* kk* aaack*
>>                         aak  akk  uh uh uh *  
>> 
>> That's the sound of me throwing up from reading your sickening crap.
>> Well done!
>> 
>You ought to see a doctor, Cowboy.  the sound should be more in
>the line of:
>
><Belch>
>

Meaning what, Wailsh?  That you *eat* Jim's sickening crap?       

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan)
Subject: Re: Human waste, *yawn* (FUCKING TWITTY IS A THIEF!)
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 06:15:21 GMT

Mark B. writes:

>In article <1993Jan21.134348.13904@bsu-ucs> 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>>In article <21597@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>, ez012344@chip.ucdavis.edu writes:

>>Your a complete waste brain cells. Get a life, go to hell, etc, etc, etc,
>>before I spank your worthless ass of the net. 

Hey Boot Camp Twitty - get your own comebacks you slime bag. Why don't you
go do some push ups on top of Dall'Agattas ass or something?

 >Stealing from Hannigan now, Jeff?

Fuckin right he is.

>Twitty's score so far...

>Originality               0
>Humour                    1      <------ TYPO
>Persistence              10   
>Dimtwittedness           10      <-----  TYPO - should be 100

>>JEFF TWITTY
>>ARMY R.O.T.C. (Rotting Organic Tannery Cheese)
>>a.k.a. PROUD BUCHANAN SUPPORTER


Jeff Twit
Army ROTC (R_ight O_n T_he C_cok)
a.k.a. READY FOR A GAY ROOMATE