HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sms@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (steven.m.stein)
Subject: Re: Trip to Wisconsin - Any Suggestions????
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 17:31:59 GMT

In article <3840071@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM> wjb@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Bill Buse) writes:
>In soc.singles, sms@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (steven.m.stein) writes:
>
>You're just missing the EAA Convention and Airshow in Oshkosh, which begins
>July 31.  If you could stay around there a few more days you'd likely find
>many things to do and new people to meet.  :-)  
>
>Bill
>wjb@hpisla.lvld.hp.com


Yes, I heard about the Airshow, but, unfortunately, as of Wed., the
trip was cancelled.  Next one is Louisiana......but anything can
change.  Thanks for the ideas though.

				Steve
				
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: sethb@fid.morgan.com (Seth Breidbart)
Subject: Re: Those looooong and hard love sessions
Organization: my opinions only
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 21:33:34 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.182324.1@tesla.njit.edu> sjo2693@tesla.njit.edu
quotes himself, saying:
>In article <1992Jul22.091927.1@tesla.njit.edu>, sjo2693@tesla.njit.edu writes:

>> I prefer lovemaking to last as long as two people can stand

Me, I'll continue as long as I can lie down and keep moving, well past
the point where I don't have enough energy to stand.  (And, under the
right circumstances, even the moving part becomes unnecessary.)
(Especially when lovemaking covers a lot more than just sex.)

Seth		sethb@fid.morgan.com
From: mikeu@dinar.sbi.COM (Michael Urbanski)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 27 Jul 92 18:28:40 GMT
Organization: Salomon Brothers Arbitrage Support, NY,NY

In article <l6qr5iINN4g6@news.bbn.com>, Bonger writes:
|> 
|> >Given the opportunity if you came across a seriously gorgeously horny
|> >girl who was very repsonsive and willing to get to bed with you, but
|> >you knew she was only 14 years old.
|> >
|> >Would you ??
|> >
|> >a/	Without a second thought
|> >b/	Only if you knew you would not be caught
|> >c/	?

How 'bout c/ NO!!! That would be sick and irresponsible.  You could really
mess up the young girl's head.
|> 
|> Well, yes, I would. (between a and b), BUT don't you think it depends a lot on
|> age difference. I'm still young (within 10 years of 14) so it would be more

Bonger, you should seek help.  Let's pretend you're 23 years old.  Besides the 
fact it is ILLEGAL (in the USA), you're messing with a child's mind.  Never
mind the fact she's horny, hot, ready and willing, at 14 she is not mentally
ready for this.  She is also probably not ready for the quick dumping that would
follow.  I mean, it is not like you can be SEEN with this little piece
of jailbait. 

|> so it would be more
|> natural, since a lot of married couples are almost 10 years apart. But if I was
|> 30 or 40, then my answer would probaly be different since it wouldn't be
|> natural anymore....
|> 
Try again, Bonger.  You're mixing apples and oranges.  The couple who are 30
and 40 are both mature adults.  The couple who are 14 and 24 are not mature
adults.  One is confused and the other is a criminal.

Wake up, pervert.

|> 									#Bonger#

And use your real name.  I've got to tell your local police to keep an
eye on you.

-- 
###############################################################
# Michael L. Urbanski # (212)783-6843         # HAPPY! HAPPY! #
# Salomon Bros. Inc.  # mikeu@daffy.sbi.com   #   JOY! JOY!   #
# 7 World Trade Center# uunet!sbi!daffy!mikeu #               #
# NY, NY  10048       #                       #  Ren & Stimpy #
###############################################################
From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Date: 29 Jul 92 12:35:12 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Jul28.220434.15278@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.ibm.com writes:
>In  <1992Jul27.182840.6897@sbil.co.uk>  mikeu@dinar.sbi.COM (Michael Urbanski) writes:
>> In article <l6qr5iINN4g6@news.bbn.com>, Bonger writes:
>> |>
>> |> >Given the opportunity if you came across a seriously gorgeously horny
>> |> >girl who was very repsonsive and willing to get to bed with you, but
>> |> >you knew she was only 14 years old.
>> |> >
>> |> >Would you ??
>> |> >
>
>Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
 
 You know I was gonna stay out of this, But, has anybody noticed
some of those olympic gymnastic girls ain't have bad. Now the swimmers
I wouldn't wanna meet in a dark alley.

 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Life After College
Date: 22 Jul 92 22:59:29 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Jul22.205452.4835@walter.bellcore.com> nobody writes:
|This is the main reason why bars 
|aren't all that great for meeting potential mates. Either spend more time 
|with a person that is willing to stick around for more than two minutes
|or find a place that forces you to talk/interact for a while.

Again, this is a general statement and not necessarily true for all bars.  
That is why I prefer places that dancing is not the primary activity.  I
prefer places with a more social atmosphere.  The bar in "Cheers" is a good
example.  In a place where dancing is the primary activity the "two minute
meeting" is going to be pretty common.  If the music is real loud you can't
really get much of a conversation going.   I like going to places that have
dart boards because it's something that I'm good at and it's any easy way
to meet people.  I had an interesting coincidence last night.  I was 
recently recruited to be the captain of a dart team in a league that the woman
that runs the league plays on.  She went on vacation and we were short a
couple of players so she asked this guy to play.  He showed up last night and
it turned out that I had met him three weeks ago on a weekend fishing trip with
six other guys.  This was his first league and a real good time joking with
the other team.  He's already on convert.  BTW, this is a co-ed league which
means that there are MOTAS that have the same interest that you do.  
-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: topless
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 92 18:08:56 GMT

In article <1992Jul24.133502.1723@newstand.syr.edu> haroome@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Allisson Roome) writes:
>
>THANK YOU!!!  I think I have another activity for the NYC Boink - A
>Topless Male contest (I'm sure we have some women willing to
>'volunteer' their services as judges) - I, personally, like the idea.
>Although, for the more modest, we could have a wet male tee-shirt
>contest. So, Women of the Boink, what do you think?

What?  No wet male armor contest?

Trygve   (Though I must admit that I haven't been in any wet chainmail
          contests for a while--I'm (ahem) a bit rusty at them.)
From: tarra@skat.usc.edu (Frat Boy)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: being young - the universal disease (was: Re: Fraternities (was: Re: E.W.- Average age of subscribers))
Date: 23 Jul 1992 13:52:50 -0700
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: skat.usc.edu

In article <1992Jul22.215307.28038@octel.com> dfair@octel.com (Donald Fair) writes:
>>>about U.S. politics.  I probably understood more about politics then than most
>>>of the adults (at that time) did around me.  Yet I couldn't vote and they 
>
>	How odd he feels that aging brings no wisdom but is quick to
>	point out that his knowledge base has increased with time.

How odd it is that you are making things up to support your argument.  I said
the more I studied the more I knew.  I could have done this studying over a 
period of hours days or years.  I said nothing about aging and the time span.
Perhaps you should try reading my post before criticizing it.

>

>	yard stick to show that nothing is gained with age.
>	Without aging and the knowledege it brings how could
>	you have any cause and effect arguments. They are 
>	all time dependant. 

You make a tremendous jump in logic here that is totally false.  I know more
about things because I have studied them.  My argument is simply that age alone
has nothing to do with wisdom as you are showing perfectly.  Studying and 
seeking new knowledge is where wisdom is gained as well as intelligence.  I 
know plenty of older engineers that fancy themselves very intelligent that 
still cant have an intellectual conversation if there are no formulas involved.
What have they gained from age in the area of social skills?
>
>Perhaps a study in logic will aid the political studies.
>
Perhaps a course in reading comprehension will help your logic studies.

>_____________________________________________
>Donald H. Fair       Software Sanitation Eng.

Tom
-- 
"Chicks dig me because I rarely wear underwear"  
					Bill Murray
From: swann@acsu.buffalo.edu (Stephen Swann)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: I'm Crushed
Date: 23 Jul 92 23:29:53 GMT
Organization: UB

In article <70366@apple.Apple.COM> stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>swann@acsu.buffalo.edu (Stephen Swann) writes:
>>>
>>>Damn.  Just when I thought Stef had the best sense of humor!
>
>>She does; mine is merely a pale imitation of her genius.
>
>>I do have the best suckups, though.
>
>I'll say.
>
>But maybe we should go a round in the ring for the title of
>soc.singles.deity.funny, just for the heck of it.

What, you want me to prostitute my work?  Turn the delicate art of humor
into a mud-wrestling spectacle for the masses?!

OK.

-- 
Steve Swann                 |    Speak to me in many voices; make
swann@acsu.buffalo.edu      |      them all sound like one...  -BOC
From: luzenko@catfish.ocpt.ccur.com (Bill Luzenko)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Would you Shag a 14 year old ??
Summary: Don't do it! be stronger and more mature. You will make yourself pay
	 later in your life. If you endure you will look at that time as your finest hour
Date: 22 Jul 92 20:39:56 GMT
Organization: Concurrent - Oceanport NJ
From: dhardin@bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Net.Women
Date: 28 Jul 1992 21:06:40 GMT
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
Reply-To: dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin)
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com
Keywords: good looking cute beautiful etc.

blackp@med.umich.edu (Jeremy Thomas James) writes:
>
>--------------
>I friend of mine and are are having a dispute as to whether there
>are actually any good looking net.women that read this news group.
>Any suggestions as to how this dispute could be settled?

I'm having a hard time choosing between the different answers that came
to mind, so I'll go ahead and use them all:

Flame 1:  No, there are no good looking women reading this.  It is 
axiomatic that everyone on the net is funny-looking and weird because
if we were good looking and normal we'd be doing something else.  My
sole source of comfort is that you're probably even more funny-looking
and weird than I am.

Flame 2:  Good looking?  I've been told that I have an adorable logon id,
to say nothing of some really great ascii.  (Translation:  You can't see 
us, so why care what we look like?)

Flame 3:  There aren't any good looking women, but sitting back and 
counting the twits that crawl out of the woodwork can be a rewarding
(if time consuming) hobby.

Dawn 

PS  Thanks for the straight lines, I'm in a rotten mood and I've been
wanting to broil somebody.
"If he attempts to kiss her on the lips she should turn her head slightly so
that the kiss falls harmlessly on her cheek instead.  If he attempts to kiss
her anyplace else she should quickly pull the gown back in place, spring from
the bed, and announce that nature calls her to the toilet.  This will generally
dampen his desire to kiss in the forbidden territory."
"Instruction and Advice for the Young Bride" by Ruth Smythers (1894)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: rock@medch.b17a.ingr.com (Chris Hudson)
Subject: Re: Net.Women
Reply-To: rock@medch.b17a.ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 13:55:38 GMT

johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:

>I'd like to second this.  Dawn does have a great ascii.

Nothing like a little ascii-ssing....

Chris Hudson
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: jjj@mits.mdata.fi (Joni Jarvenkyla)
Subject: Re: I can't drive 55
Organization: Microdata Oy, Helsinki, Finland
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 18:29:19 GMT

In article <1992Jul29.155023.14676@cs.ucla.edu> gds@cs.ucla.edu (Greg Skinner) writes:
>other countries.  For example, I have done a lot of driving in
>Germany, where in many places there are no speed limits.  It's my
>opinion that most high-speed accidents are due to unsafe driving, as
>opposed to speeding.

And when these two nicely combine, we have a megazillion pieces of
metal, glass and flesh blocking a whole goddamn autobahn for hours!

No problem with a motorbike, though...gives really sadistic pleasure to
drive past a 5 km queue of cars on the roadside.

Oh yes, don't forget the 0.8 promille limit - you can nicely fit in a
couple of beers and go gliding 200+ km/h... ;-)

-- 
jjj@mits.mdata.fi     Thanks, Life; thanks, Death    And the other me:
jjj@niksula.hut.fi    for freeing me from self       Jenny L{rv{joki
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: yyz@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (donald.w.coons)
Subject: Re: Define "FEMININE" anything goes...
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 14:08:39 GMT

In article <1992Jul28.124600.10453@cbfsb.cb.att.com> jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton) writes:
>In article <1992Jul27.234709.1375@lub001.lamar.edu> lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu writes:
>>What does "Feminine" mean to you?
>>
>>[ANYTHING GOES]
> 
>    ^------ How exciting.
> Feminine means Bathsheba and the Orient.
> 
>>
> 
> Why does your employer want to know this?
>
> 
>================================================================================
> Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
>================================================================================
James, its good to see that you have caught up thru those 700 or so articles
you had to read. But no comment on shagging a 14 year old? Maybe that week off
mellowed you. I'll do my best to cheer the Cubs on for you today, wouldn't
want to see you lose that bet.
From: cs.tcd.ie!droe@overmind.mind.org
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: She called, I came, she smiled, I slept
Date: 22 Jul 92 17:34:00 GMT
Organization: Trinity College, Dublin (Astrobiology)
X-mailer: Stadel 3.4a-227
X-Spam-content: irrelevant

>> Oh, be still my beating heart.......
>>
>> May I please nominate this as the ultimate motto of all male
>>subscribers to soc.singles??? Does anyone second the motion? :>
>>
>>    Emma. :>
>>
>Ah Emma dear, why increase the perception that all women are selfish
>bitches?
>
>Personally I love the feel and sound of my lover coming........

 And this sound is???

 In my experience, nothing divides people into two camps like the
silent v. noisy orgasm division. It can lead to extreme problems or
satisfaction. My preference is for the noisy, but I tend to remain
totally silent myself. I suppose this reveals something deep and
meaninful but dont really care.

 Dave "Was that the cat?" Roe
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: Ross Ridge <ross@zooid.guild.org>
Subject: Re: long hair
Organization: ZOOiD BBS
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 18:31:43 GMT

fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter) writes:
>BTW, realize that not being attracted to no breasts does not mean being
>attracted to super big ones (DD or bigger). My room-mate made this mistake.
 
Ross writes:
>Gee... too bad for your room-mate, I hear this kind of surgery isn't
>reversable.  

fred@walter.UUCP (Fred Walter) writes:
>No, she didn't enlarge her pair to that size, she found a pair that size.

Oh.

>> I see you've got your machine back up and running... for how long?
>
>It's always been up and running.

Hmm... I thought you had sold it.  The occasional "haven't able to connect
with machine walter for 7 days" message I got when sending mail to
W'loo seemed confirm that.

>(Have you looked at 386BSD 0.1 yet ?)

Nope.  Sean is supposed to have BSDI now though.

								Ross Ridge

-- 
Ross Ridge - The Great HTMU					     l/	 //
								    [OO][oo]
ross@zooid.guild.org						    /()\/()/
uunet.ca!zooid!ross						     db	 //
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode)
Subject: Re: Breast Puns
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix @ U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 21:13:47 GMT

In article <1992Jul22.183717.1364@lub001.lamar.edu> lairdpg@lub001.lamar.edu writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.155954.430@cbnewsd.cb.att.com>, nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>> In article <MARTINC.92Jul22114137@grover.cs.unc.edu> martinc@grover.cs.unc.edu (Charles R. Martin) writes:

>>>Another thread of puns?  I bet we can return you tit for tat.
>> 
>> Ah, a thread like this is sure to bring back some great mammaries.
> 
>I just heard today that I was going to have to upgrade my PC to 16 megs,
>So, I am off to the electronics parts house to get me a bunch of fast
>"Mammary Chips"  (HeHeHe  Roaring laughter in background!@&)

Nononono--in a pun war, the idea is to come up with a *different* pun than
the last person used.
From: terra@reed.edu (Clippers in '93!!!)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Life After College
Date: 22 Jul 92 21:51:22 GMT
Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon

In article <1992Jul22.205452.4835@walter.bellcore.com> nobody writes:
>In article <1992Jul22.185444.25277@reed.edu> terra@reed.edu (Clippers in '93!!!) writes:
>>whether you're into a person.  All too often lately I've met men who seem
>>interesting enough from the two minutes of dancing/flirting we engage in after
>>three drinks in some nightclub, gave them my phone number (not that I"m a 
>>swinger, but in L.A., you'll NEVER see that person again if you don't at least
>>go this far), then when they call and I really get to TALK to them, I realize
>>they're a total loser or just another asshole who wants sex.  (this puts me in
>>the asshole category too, just to be fair)  
>
>You are just looking at the result of social conditioning which makes a lot
>of men spend all their time honing up their first-two-minutes capabilities 
>in order to "get their foot in the door". This is the main reason why bars 
>aren't all that great for meeting potential mates. Either spend more time 
>with a person that is willing to stick around for more than two minutes
>or find a place that forces you to talk/interact for a while.

Probably true, and thanks for the advice, but to be perfectly honest, and allow
me to be shallow for a minute, I LIKE the guys I meet in bars.  They usually
are in my same age range (I'm 23) they are making an effort to look presentable,
which means I see them looking thier best and know what I"M getting into, and
they buy me drinks and dance with me, all things I think are GOOD.  I actually
spent all three hours at a bar with the guy I first danced with the other night,
and he seemed alright, but still turned out to be a jerk on the phone.  Oh well,
I'd rather do this than go to church group, or singles meetings, or any other
of the kinds of things people might suggest to met people with "similar 
interests">  in fact, the only BETTER place I can think of to meet guys is at
basketball games, but I have to wait until November 1st for that, and it costs 
a hell of a lot more than cover charge at a nightclub ( now that the Clippers
are winning, at least).  Maybe I'm missing something here, but people
keep suggesting "go to places where there are people with similar interests"
which then sorta implies that nobody could possibly be interested in 
drinking, playing pool, dancing, listening to contemporary music (in my case
hip-hop and rap) and watching sports.  Can't think of a better place than
a bar to meet the type of guys that would share my interests, can you? So 
why is everyone so quick to knock bars as places to meet S.O.'s?  

Terra

>						Walter
>
>What disclaimer?
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tegarr01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Subject: Why 14? How about 25-30?
Organization: University of Louisville
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 13:00:30 GMT

My interest would be in a 30 year old.  I am tired of being with girls my age. 
They are inexperienced dead beats.  Maybe it is my fault...NOT.  But the women
that I come across just do not have what it takes to make an intimate session
work.  I feel that a lady of 25-30 years would be experienced enough to help me
experience complete satisfaction.

Sure a 14 year could be sexy but, I doubt that she would be worth it.  I have
been with 20 years old that couldn't keep me erect.(Just a phrase)  I don't
see a 14 year doing any better.

I like a sex partner who contributes to the moment.  A 14 year old, I think
not.  If I wanted a dead "   "  I could find a 20 year old.  Why risk getting
arrested?

Teg

"Explore the experienced and adventure you will find."
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Net.Women
Keywords: good looking cute beautiful etc.
Date: 29 Jul 92 20:21:17 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <l7bdn0INN91b@news.bbn.com> dhardin@spcink.bbn.com (Dawn Hardin) writes:
|blackp@med.umich.edu (Jeremy Thomas James) writes:
|>
|>--------------
|>I friend of mine and are are having a dispute as to whether there
|>are actually any good looking net.women that read this news group.
|>Any suggestions as to how this dispute could be settled?
 
Having met all the women that post to this group I'd like to confirm that
each and every one of them is good looking. Unfortunately, for
you and your friend, all the men are good looking as well. At least they're
better looking than you and your friend.

|I'm having a hard time choosing between the different answers that came
|to mind, so I'll go ahead and use them all:
|
|Flame 1:  No, there are no good looking women reading this.  It is 
|axiomatic that everyone on the net is funny-looking and weird because
|if we were good looking and normal we'd be doing something else.  My
|sole source of comfort is that you're probably even more funny-looking
|and weird than I am.
 
Just kidding with the previous answer.  Actually, we're all nerds and 
nerdettes.  Even the women wear pocket protectors and have tape on their
glasses.

|Flame 2:  Good looking?  I've been told that I have an adorable logon id,
|to say nothing of some really great ascii.  (Translation:  You can't see 
|us, so why care what we look like?)
 
I'd like to second this.  Dawn does have a great ascii.

-- 
+============================================================================++
| John Fereira            "Is that all you ever think about?"                |
| johnf@auspex.com                                                           |
+============================================================================++
Newsgroups: soc.singles