HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Subject: Re: minimize mouse movement (was Re: 2.1 bugs, suggestions.)
Keywords: mouse, slow
Reply-To: mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Meir I Green)
Organization: Columbia University, New York
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:06:58 GMT

In article <1993Jan25.082527.16070@leland.Stanford.EDU> wkn@leland.Stanford.EDU (Ken Neighbors) writes:
>In article <1993Jan25.072101.28604@weyrich.UUCP> uunet.uu.net!weyrich!orville writes:
>>While we are talking about features to minimize mouse movement -- how about
>>putting the CLOSE option at the top of the pull-down menu invoked by the
>>top left corner of a window? 9 times out of 10, if I open the menu, that's what
>>I want to do, rather than having to hunt down the list to find it at some
>>window-dependent place in the list?
>
>How about making the mouse pointer move further across the screen for the
>same amount of mouse movement!  My wrist gets sore from having to pick up
>my mouse so often and put it back down just because I've run out of
>mousepad space.  (I'm using a 1024x768 resolution. Can't IBM skip some
>pixels or something?)  I remember hearing that they made a double speed for
>PS/2 mice or something similar a while back, but what about everyone else?
>
>Ken Neighbors
>wkn@leland.stanford.edu

Hmm...only takes about 1-1.5" using my logitech mouseman bus at 800x600.
Does this happen if you move the mouse faster (try using the ballistic effect).

By the way, IBM, please allow us to turn the ballistic effect *off* if we
want linear tracking!

Thanks.
Meir
:-)

 * * * * *  =================== Internet   mig@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
* * * * * * == Meir I. Green == AmateurPkt N2JPG@W2XO.PA.USA.NOAM
 * * * * *  = mig@columbia.edu= Amateur IP N2JPG@uhm.ampr.org
* * * * * * =================== BC-Goliath green@smtplink.barnard.columbia.edu
From: gthomas@unixg.ubc.ca (Guy R Thomas)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: repost: Summary of OS/2 2.1beta ftp sites
Date: 23 Jan 93 20:41:21 GMT
Organization: The University of British Columbia
NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca

3.5" images are also on ftp.cs.ubc.ca (137.82.8.5) in the directory
/pub/mirrors3/os2.1beta

Guy
gthomas@native-ed.bc.ca
From: eric@tgm.CAM.ORG (Eric Trepanier)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Bug in WINOS2 3.1 size display?
Date: 22 Jan 93 07:35:55 GMT
Organization: Me? Organized?

Don't know if anyone else noticed this, but under OS/2 2.1 beta, the OS/2
applets seem to have an odd way of reporting free memory or free disk space.
Try opening the About... box of any WINOS2 applet, on my system, with 4Mb
DPMI limit, the dialog box says I have 4 Kb free (obviously, there are
three 0's missing there...)  The same thing happens in the File Manager,
which says my Hard Disk has 35Kb free, when it actually has a litlle over
35,000Kb (35 Mb) free.  Am I the only one with this problem?

Oh well, I can live with it, but it is annoying nonetheless...

Eric
--
Eric Trepanier  (514) 663-6929
eric@tgm.CAM.ORG
"Everybody has a right to believe in something.
 I believe I'll have another beer."
From: djn@ukc.ac.uk (D.J.Neades)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: PSPM2 under 2.1 Beta
Date: 25 Jan 93 12:31:11 GMT
Reply-To: djn@ukc.ac.uk (D.J.Neades)
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.

In article <24JAN199311361195@zeus.tamu.edu> lmp8913@zeus.tamu.edu (PRESTON, LISA M) writes:
>	Under the 2.1 Beta, PSPM reports any running DOS Programs 
>with the name "-zombie-".
>	Also, I tried killing off pmshell and my screen resolution
>changed from 1024x768 to 640x480!  I haven't yet been able to reproduce
>it -I think it must involve previously running CSHOW in a DOS full-screen.
>It was back to normal after reboot.

You could try using PMps, a similar utility. I've just uploaded it to
hobbes, so it's in /pub/uploads/pmps.zip at the moment.

PMps reports running DOS programs as vdm/Virtual DOS Machine.
Its tree view of processes is more like the drive objects' (but without
icons) than PSPM's, and is considerably more compact.

It has full, context sensitive online help.

>LISA
--
Daniel J Neades         3rd year computer science undergraduate
                        University of Kent at Canterbury, England
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: OS/2 Wish List
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 04:14:03 GMT

In article <enk2.83.727847427@po.cwru.edu> enk2@po.cwru.edu (Erik Kovach) writes:
>>Partial OS/2 release 2.1 wishlist:
>>1. Password for all icons and folders with master password for everything
>>   in case forgotten.

PC/DACS provides this sort of feature.  It is available for the price
of $49 if you mention the OS/2 Coupon Book.  (See the FAQ List for
details.)

>>2. Easier Text drawing in Icon edit.

Can you elaborate?  (There's a roundabout way to do so already if I'm
thinking what you're thinking.)

>>3. More beautiful 'wall papers', maybe some Van Gogh and Monet.

IBM has released several, but you have to go download them.  (They are
available via anonymous ftp from ftp-os2.nmsu.edu or
software.watson.ibm.)

I tend to prefer this method -- bitmaps take up a lot of disk space.
Or would you like to see a 30th floppy diskette?  :-)

>>4. Multi-font DOS/OS2 windows with option to reset all.

Agreed.  With jump scrolling and the ability to use ATM monospaced
typefaces.

>>5. A more elegant way to change settings (config.sys and autoexec.bat)
>>   See SETUP of DR DOS 6.

Agreed, although third parties have done a fine job here.  Take a look
at INIMaint and the Config Editor, both available via anonymous ftp
from ftp-os2.nmsu.edu (check /pub/os2/00Index for location).

>>6. A real good book for REXX. Mr. Mike Colishaw, will you re-write your
>>   book? BTW, your PMGLOBE program is EXCELLENT.

The pair of manuals you can order from IBM are quite respectable.
They also don't cost all that much.

>Add (for me):
>7.  A Workplace Shell backup program (I know...I tried WPSBACK...I don't 
>    like it).

The 2.1 beta draft documentation refers to copying the two INI files
to move or backup the desktop.  Evidently IBM has relocated some of
the desktop into these INI files; move the INI files to another
machine and you move the desktop, it seems.  I haven't verified this
assertion yet.

>8.  Fixing Win-OS/2 sessions (mine die sometimes)

Known bug -- this is beta code, after all.

>9.  Improved DOS and OS/2 windowed session speed in 8-bit color. (may be the
>    the drivers limitations, tho)

The jump scrolling would help, naturally.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0i, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: rom@cci632.cci.com (Rudynell S. Millian)
Subject: Re: Is OS/2 a dead end?
Keywords: So quoth Bill Gates
Organization: [Computer Consoles, Inc., Rochester, NY
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 13:51:13 GMT

In article <1993Jan20.163847.26969@cbfsb.cb.att.com> feg@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (forrest.e.gehrke) writes:
>PC Week for January 18th has an interview with Bill Gates.
>I quote the relevant item:
>
>PC Week: Your feeling is that OS/2 is a dead-end platform?
>
>Gates: It's certainly a dead end.  That's indisputable.
>Nobody would dispute that it's a dead end.
>
>
>So, are we all working with a dead end?  Are we just 
>whistling while passing the graveyard before 
>Microsoft unloads NT around May of this year?
>
>
>Forrest Gehrke feg\@dodger.att.com
>
>

	I wouldn't worry about OS/2 being a dead end. Unlike MS, IBM has not
waivered on its support of OS/2. OS/2 has been around, in some form or another,
almost as long as Windows has, and IBM's commitment to this product is rock 
solid, despite OS/2 lack of popular support! And IBM has mad it clear where 
it is taking OS/2. If anything I would be worried about MS's NT being a dead 
end.
	It is clear that for Microsoft the ONLY thing that counts is making a
profit. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, but the way I see it, the
computer industry should have a more noble goal than that. If NT shows any 
signs of weakness profit wise, you can be assured that Bill Gates will put it 
to sleep ( just like he tried, is trying, to do to OS/2 ).


	Unfortunately Bill Gates has obtained tabloid status, and is currently
the person the general public thinks of when it hears about the computer
industry. If Mr Gates wants to hurt OS/2, this is the perfect time to do it,
and he knows it.
From: SPGJAF@CMSA.Berkeley.Edu (Joseph A. Faracchio)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: XGA what?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 93 15:36:08 PST
Organization: UC Berkeley (TCPIP)
NNTP-Posting-Host: cmsa.berkeley.edu

In article <1993Jan28.212350.18897@njitgw.njit.edu>
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:
.... (deleted)
>A Microchannel device driver can not be the same as an ISA driver.
>That is, ISA drivers may work with MCA cards, due to general
... (etc)
 
THIS brings up an interesting point.  I'm sure I can get a lot of comments
from the net and unofficial ones from IBM 'netters' but I wonder if I-B-M
can respond ooooohh-fficially:
 
Question:  Since Radius licenses XGA-2 from IBM will IBM guarantee OS/2 support
for R's XGA-2 card as long as IBM supports its own XGA card?
 
IF the Radius card needs drivers beyond what IBM supplies with the OS (i.e
drivers from Radius,   then I'm no better off then I am with my
_________ (fill in the blank) __________   SVGA clone card.
 
I.E.  I'm still STUCK depending on the 3rd party vendor to supply drivers
for the latest / greatest version of my favorite O.S. every 6 months to a year.
Which then means a lot of waiting and catching up and 'sorry charlie' when new
versions of OS/2 (or applications) come out.
 
This is crazy!   Back when 8514 ISA clones were coming out it was real
important to ask if it was *REGISTER* compatible with IBM's 8514/A
and not just an 8514/a 'emulator' that required drivers.  That way you just
installed OS/2 or CAD/CAM and said its an 8514/A and it worked.  No drivers,
no hanging out on a limb etc. nothing!
 
I am getting a sense that things are changing in that even IBM equipment needs
device drivers these days but at least IBM keeps up the support for a year or
two before it gives you the kiss-off.   E.G.  Look at 8514/A its discontinued
about 1(+)years now but they still work and there's drivers coming for 2.1.
Eventually IBM will say 'support dropped' but by then it will pretty old stuff.
and who here could complain?
 
Whereas my favorite SVGA board maker tells me they don't support drivers for
the original, & to buy version II now, if I want OS/2 drivers and BTW they'll
be out 6 months after IBM gift wraps a development kit for them and sends them
a personal invitation to support their video cards in OS/2.  :-(
 
And to add insult to injury Radius is demanding double what IBM wants for the
MCA version.
             the world sure is changing! :-)  .. joe.f.
 
SPGJAF @ CMSA.Berkeley.Edu    also ... USUCA886 @ IBMMAIL via x.400
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: samiam@netcom.com (Scott Moore)
Subject: IBM accepts internet problem reports
Summary: IBM will accept problem reports
Keywords: IBM INTERNET
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest) 
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 19:27:41 GMT

The following was received from IBM:

We have just reinstated Internet support.  It has gone back the way it
used to be, so you can tell your Internet customers that it is business
as usual.  We will not make a public statement as to the reopening of
Internet support, as we never really supported it.  Thanks for your help
during this time.

This was affirmed by an earlier post in this group. Could one of you all
repost the IBM address ?
-- 
Scott A. Moore [SAM]  | Why should I go outside ? It's unheated, poorly 
samiam@netcom.com     | furnished, and has far to little electrical
Santa Cruz, CA USA    | outlets.
408-423-1624          | 
ExaByte Corp.         | "my opinions do not represent my company, etc."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Is hobbes logged on archie? (was Re: Problems with SIO_034)
Date: 25 Jan 93 03:08:41 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <1993Jan24.232435.22626@venus.ic.cmc.ca> jcalvert@scorpio.ic.cmc.ca (John Calvert) writes:
>>>of this wonderful driver is listed with archie rutgers. I wonder if 
>>>hobbes is being properly logged by archie sites.
>I'd like to thank the readers for their kind responses. However, my
>real question was, and still is, "Is hobbes being logged by archie?"
>I didn't get any archie listings for files that I know are on hobbes.

Not yet, although some of its mirrors may be.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0i, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: os2man@panix.com (Larry Salomon Jr.)
Subject: Re: converting GIF ---===> BMP
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 13:07:50 GMT

In <C1E44w.2q4@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (kellmeyer steven l) writes:

>nsorathi@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Nilesh Sorathia) writes:

>>Is there a program out that will convert 1024x768x256 GIF to
>>1024x768x256 BMP?  I have a program called GWS that's suppose to convert
>>the files, but everytime I try converting it gives me an error saying
>>something like "file can't be converted".  I tried all the GIFs I have
>>and none of them worked.
>>What I'm trying to do is make a BMP for the background of OS/2.
>>Does anyone have any suggestions?
>>If so, my E-Mail address is "Nsorathia@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu"

>Ditto.  Where does one pick up a program that does such a conversion? 

Get the Image Toolkit and Image Browser from the CD-ROM.  The Image Toolkit
can load GIFs (plus BMPS, etc.) and can save in BMP format.  Load the image
into IBROW and save as a BMP with the attributes you like.

Cheers,
Q
-- 
"If you choose not to decide, you  | "My other body is in the shop" - seen
 still have made a choice" - Rush  |  on a T-shirt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  Go OS/2!  --
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: nheu@wimsey.bc.ca (Norman Heu)
Subject: Poor D/L Performance @2400BPS
Organization: Wimsey Information Services
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 04:13:52 GMT


Help!  Telix 3.15 running in a background windowed DOS session
can't maintain a download at 2400BPS.  It starts with a decent
CPS but eventually drops to about 30 CPS and fails.

Other running programs are the clock, another DOS session, and
an OS/2 window (with nothing really running).

I've tweaked the DOS settings as per the FAQ (COM_HOLD on etc..)
and it still fails.

I'm running a 386DX-25, 8megs ram, WD 170 meg drive, and plain
VGA (Trident 9000).  CSD level=XR02000.. I just bought OS/2 last
week and did a full install.

WHAT'S WRONG?  I don't want to install beta com drivers or anything...
please tell me how to get this to work with the basic OS/2 package.
	-Norm

-- 

  Norman Heu   nheu@van-bc.wimsey.bc.ca -or- nheu@van-bc.wimsey.com
               [Vancouver, BC, Canada]
From: yjwu@eng.umd.edu (Yu-Jen Wu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Anyone using 'vdisk.sys' with 2.1 beta?
Date: 22 Jan 1993 21:10:24 GMT
Organization: Project GLUE, University of Maryland, College Park
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: paxsunc.eng.umd.edu

Hi,

Has anyone used 'vdisk.sys' under OS/2 2.1 beta? It works well with
GA+SP, but locks up my machine with 2.1 beta. The system hangs right
before the WPS could come up. Maybe this is a new bug?


Yu-Jen Wu      yjwu@eng.umd.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: gbj@melb.bull.oz.au (Graham Jose)
Subject: EMX & IBM TCP/IP NFS
Organization: Bull HN Information Systems Australia.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 01:00:09 GMT

It would appear that whenever I access a mounted NFS drive using IBM
TCP/IP with a program that utilises the EMX library, 99% of the time
the NFS control program (NFSCTL) traps with a 000D. 
ie: running grep,ls,emacs etc

Has anyone else experienced this? Is there any fix and/or avoidance?

Graham
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: mcover@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Mark Coverdill)
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.1b
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 01:10:25 GMT

In article <1993Jan22.221958.26657@wam.umd.edu> adhir@wam.umd.edu (Al Dhir) writes:
>
>Hello all.  Has anyone else noticed that since installing 2.1b, certain
>DOS programs can't recognize the HD anymore?  Specifically, F-Prot, the
>latest version available on wuarchive nor reports "Error reading Drive X"
>as soon as you try to scan the drive, whereas before it used to work like
>a charm.  This is really annoying.
>
>I have found the 2.1b to be extremely unstable.  It locks up exiting full
>screen windows apps about 50% of the time and CTRL-ALT-NUMLOCK now do
>nothing but freeze the machine.  Booting from a DOS VDM hangs the entire
>machine also, if you try to use UMBs (by including a DOS=high,umb) in
>the config.sys. 
>

This was happening to me quite frequently and I had the same notion you
did, in fact I was about ready to go back to Windoze! (say it isn't so :-))

Thanks to helpful hints from this forum (don't set DELDIR in
config.sys!) I now have a quite stable 2.1b going. Here is a tip of my
own. Boot from the install disk and get to the A: prompt. Run chkdsk
/f on your system (its on the 3rd disk).

If *any* errors show up from chkdsk, especially cross-linked
attributes make sure you fix them. I do that by creating a temporary
directory. Copying the errant file or directory to the temporary
directory and then deleting the original. Run chkdsk again to see if
the errors are fixed. Then copy back to the original. Do this one at a
time until all the errors are fixed.

I believe many of my problems were related to installing over GA+SP
and then reinstalling several times.  The extended attributes got
screwed up and I was unable to access some files in a DOS VDM. I
believe this is all stated in the FAQ but worth repeating for those
just trying out OS/2 on this wide release beta.

-- 
Mark Coverdill                                 The Ohio State University
Internet: markc+@osu.edu                              Columbus, Ohio
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: cc_paul@rcvie.co.at (Wolf Paul)
Subject: Re: 2.1 beta
Reply-To: cc_paul@rcvie.co.at (Wolf N. Paul)
Organization: Alcatel Austria Informatik R&D, Vienna, Austria
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 07:28:48 GMT

In article <21JAN199308402850@vmsa.is.csupomona.edu> cvadsgpb@vmsa.is.csupomona.edu (Srikanth Viswanathan) writes:
>In WinOS/2 3.1, how do I disable the Print Manager from loading up?  I know
>it's something in the INI file.  I'd like to delete all of the True-Type
>fonts in the SYSTEM directory,  just to free up some space,  are there any 
>references to these fonts that I have to remove in the INI file?  Thanks!

Why do it the easy way if there is a complicated way?

For the first question, do ControlPanel->Printers and un-check the box
saying "Use Print Manager".

For the second question, do ControlPanel->Fonts->SelectAll->Delete and
answer any questions about deleting the actual font files with "yes".

Done. Finished.
-- 
            V              
+-----------------------+  Wolf N. Paul, Computer Center         wnp@rcvie.co.at
|  A  L  C  A  T  E  L  |  Alcatel Austria Informatics      +43-1-391621-122 (w)
+-----------------------+  Ruthnergasse 1-7                   +43-1-391452 (fax)
       INFORMATICS         A-1210 Vienna-Austria/Europe        +43-1-2246913 (h)
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Can I *PLEASE* get a fast COMM driver that &^$#* works!?
Date: 25 Jan 93 22:22:27 GMT
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago

In article <NXXXXB2w165w@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca> frampton@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca writes:
>> Steve Frampton writes: 
>> >Well, after my last posting about experiencing a severe system crash
>> >using Ray Gwinn's SIO driver (version 0.31, I believe) somebody told
>> >me that 0.34 is out and suggested I give it a try.
>> >The result?
>> >The system detected an internal processing
>> >error at location ##0160:fffa3bb4 - 000d:00049bb4.
>> >60000, 7016
>> >038600d1
>> >Internal revision 6.307, 92/03/01
>> >The system is stopped.  Record the location number
>> >of the error and contact your service representative.
>> Would you believe there's an sio040.zip now?  This driver is being
>> updated very rapidly.  You can find sio040.zip in /pub/uploads (for
>> the moment) on ftp-os2.nmsu.edu via anonymous ftp.
>Okay, I'll give it a try.  But I'll be plenty pissed if it happens again
>(why shouldn't it, though, it has been happening with sio001, 002, 011,
>and 034...)  :-)

Not to be rude, by why would you be "pissed" if a piece of free
software did not work?

Disappointed, I'll grant you.  But "pissed"?

I reserve being pissed for, say, a death in the family.

Anyway...

>Anyways, no idea what could have caused the system crash?  *Should* I
>be also running the X00v149a fossil driver with the SIO driver, or is
>that the cause of my crash?

Try going without and, if your application works, run that way.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0i, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Communications Problems
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 22:36:49 GMT

In article <20JAN199317174545@zeus.tamu.edu> e0v6366@zeus.tamu.edu (VARELA, EDMUNDO) writes:
>I've run into another interesting problem,
>I've downloaded pmQVT and PMComm from Hobbes, and neither of these utilities
>will work.  They report that they are unable to open COM1.  Interestingly, I
>can run Procomm from a DOS window with minimal trouble.  So, any ideas on what
>the problem is?
>BTW, my mouse is hooked up through a PS/2 port, and I only have one serial
>port (com1). (I am running GA+SP).
>Any thoughts would sure be appreciated,

It sounds like you have not installed serial device support.  To do
so, run OS/2 System -> System Setup -> Selective Install.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0i, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc