HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Size of LGB Vote
Date: 5 Nov 1992 13:45:46 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: mizar.usc.edu

In article <1992Nov5.205635.11633@PacBell.COM> 
rjwill6@pbsdts.sdcrc.pacbell.com (Rod Williams) writes:

> In an article on "The Gay Issues" in its Elections section
> (11/05/92), The New York Times mentions that the Voter
> Research and Surveys (VRS) exit poll was "the first
> nationwide poll that asked people leaving voting places if
> they were homosexual or bisexual."

Hmmm.  The LA Times exit polls asked people if they
were gay or lesbian.

> 2.4 percent of those polled identified themselves as
> homosexual or bisexual [...]
>
> Anyway, of those 2.4 percent who identified themselves, 72
> percent went for Clinton, 14 percent for Bush, 14 percent for
> Perot.

The LA Times exit polls are a little different.  In California, 
3 percent identified themselves as gay/lesbian. Of that 3 percent, 
76 percent went for Clinton, 16 percent went for Bush (goddamned 
Orange County), and 8 percent went for Perot.  In the nationwide 
poll, 3 percent also identified themselves as gay/lesbian.  Their 
votes were 74 percent for Clinton, 16 percent for Bush, and 10 
percent for Perot.  (Both exit polls had a margin of error of plus 
or minus 4 percentage points.)  Only the black (in CA 80 percent;
nationwide 86 percent) and Jewish (in CA 77 percent; nationwide
68 percent) vote was as monumentally pro-Clinton.

Arne
From: adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: discrimination at CMU
Date: 11 Nov 1992 17:46:58 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: mizar.usc.edu

In article <1992Nov11.215211.14314@cbnewsl.cb.att.com> 
ry@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (ryerson.schwark) writes:

> Oh, yes!  Any of them Faggots who can't be retrained to be closet
> cases and act like strayt white min will just have to be THROW OUT!
>
> Halleluyah!  

A student's sexual orientation and whether he or she is
in or out of the closet is of no concern to an acting 
program.  What we're talking about is how a student ACTS
on stage.

Arne
From: aberson@enh.nist.gov
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Timur Novikov
Date: 9 Nov 92 16:27:04 GMT
Organization: NIST

I spent the day yesterday at the Center for Fine Arts in Miami, to
see their Faberge exhibit, and stumbled upon an interesting gay
Russian artist in the process.

Timur Novikov does multi-media art on textiles.  The works are quite
minimalist, and I did not find it to be especially creative (it would
be different if he had actually designed the beautiful fabrics used,
but I don't think he did).  He did mix imagery of gay people such as
Oscar Wilde, Andy Warhol, and Keith Haring as ways to protest
the persecution of gay people in Russia today.

He also lives a life modelled after Warhol and Haring (artist as
public personality, trendiness, the club scene, etc.) in his hometown
of St. Petersburg.  This was the first showing of his art in the United
States, and he has had showings throughout Russia.  It is interesting
to see a fledgling queer arts movement in the former Soviet Union.

The show moves on to Dusseldorf early next year.

       Sim Aberson   Ft. Lauderdale, FL   aberson%3328.span@sdsc.edu
"It's always Beach Party Barbie, or Malibu Barbie....  That shit does not
prepare you for the true horror of a real woman's life.  Where is Single,
Abused, Trailer-Park Barbie?"             - Roseanne Arnold
Newsgroups: soc.motss,soc.bi,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: sconley@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M Conley)
Subject: Re: Time to take the offensive!!
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 04:02:33 GMT

re:  Ciaran's idea for a television campaign:

I don't know about the mass-media situation in Ireland, but something
like this could be managed rather easily in the US if a national
organization makes the commercials and then sells tapes to local groups
to help cover the cost.

Local organizations can easily purchase spots on cable television and
can target audiences that way.  For instance, when talking about the
harmful effects of discrimination on the economy, buy a spot during
the CNN Headline News "Dollars and Sense" segment.

Cable advertising is cheap and it's a lot easier to raise money for
something when the results are immediate and observable by the
contributors.  While working on political campaigns this year, I
priced 30-second cable spots for MTV, CNN, etc., in the $8.00 (small
town cable company) to $70.00 (cable company in Columbus, Ohio) range
(US dollars).

Local groups probably won't have much trouble financing
these and the end result will be a national media campaign costing
tens of thousands of dollars but financed easily at the grassroots
level.

Steve
sconley@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
From: his@the-temple.East.Sun.COM (Howard Solomon - SunExpress Support Engineer)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: social democracy (#2)
Date: 11 Nov 1992 22:18:02 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems
Distribution: world
Reply-To: his@the-temple.East.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: the-temple.east.sun.com

In article 62963@dosgate, "paul bobbitt" <paul.bobbitt@canrem.com> () writes:
>(Continued from the previous message)
>
>Perhaps you should reconsider your assumption that government
>taxation is a bad thing...
>
>Paul D. Bobbitt
>---

Therein lies the big problem in the US today.  Too few people are willing
to pay to help "others" and "society".  This is certainly an area in
which Canada is ahead of us.  I can only help that the "evilness" of taxation
wanes with the Republican lock on the US Presidency.

Howard

---
========================================================================
Howard I. Solomon			|ELECTION '92
Software Support Engineer, SunExpress	|Say goodnight, George.
his@east.sun.com			|
=========================================================================

Xref: sparky soc.motss:47110 alt.sex.motss:1641
From: shishka@coos.dartmouth.edu (Rich Yeung)
Newsgroups: soc.motss,alt.sex.motss
Subject: gay artists?
Date: 11 Nov 92 22:50:33 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

does anyone have a list of gay artists, past and present? the fields i'm
looking into are painting, drawing, and printmaking. doesn't matter if the
artist is gay but work isn't, but homoeroticism in art is a plus. so please
email me names if you know of any, from Michelangelo to Keith Haring, lesbian 
artists as well.

thanks in advance,
-r.



--
|| ______  ____________  Rich Yeung                 |  i'm too sexy for  ||
|| \    / ____________  HB 3715 Dartmouth College   |     this .sig      ||
||  \  / ____________  Hanover, NH 03755            | ------------------ ||
||   \/ ____________  shishka@coos.dartmouth.edu    |   STRIKE A POSE.   ||
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: rhayden@oracle.com (Ronald Hayden)
Subject: Re: Boycott Worse than Pointless
Organization: Oracle Corporation, Belmont, Ca.
	<mike03142921010204100@batpad.lgb.ca.us>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 04:08:50 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
              at Oracle Corporation.  The opinions expressed are those
              of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.

In case it hasn't been mentioned, Governor Roemer (spelling?) has
stated that the boycott efforts *have* had the effect of increasing
his staff's efforts to overturn Measure 2.

 -- Ron Hayden
--

  - Ronald (Roland) Hayden

    Oracle Toolkit Technical Writer
    (415) 506-6112
    4OP11
Newsgroups: soc.motss,soc.bi
From: dwells@lonestar.utsa.edu (Darren . Wells)
Subject: Re: What to do about Colorado
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 23:43:56 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.230653.26546@panix.com> tovah@panix.com (Tovah Hollander) writes:
>Not sure I heard him correctly, I replied something like, "On the
>contrary."  And he said, "Yeah, when you read through that thing, it *did*
>have some parts that weren't too good after all."  I could only splutter
>out something like, "No kidding."

Forgive me for my ignorance, but (1) What exactly does the Colorado
proposition say?  All I know is that it was not as strongly worded as
the Oregon #9.  (2) How much of a margin did it win by?

I've looked in the local newspapers, but they don't have much to say
about things outside this state.  I am interested in knowing some more
concrete facts about it than I do now.

Thanks for you reply.  Feel free to e-mail me if you don't feel like
posting.

Darren
Xref: sparky soc.motss:46802 alt.flame:14543
From: solovay@netcom.com (Andrew M. Solovay)
Newsgroups: soc.motss,alt.flame
Subject: Re: Social Democracy
Summary: Well, he asked for it...
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:32:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: netcom.1992Nov9.233218.3988
Organization: International Irony League -- Death before smileys!

In article <19921109130745ECL4JN2@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU> ECL4JN2@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU (Jack B. Nimble) writes:
>I enjoy a good flame now and then also. There aren't too many forums
>like Usenet where you can let it all go with impunity. Quite refreshing!

The plural of "forum" is "fora", you brainless crypto-breeder
communo-fascist small-dick twit!

Boy, that felt good...
-- 
Andrew M. Solovay	    "Until there was rock, you only had God."
					--Ziggy Stardust

#include <disclaimer.h>
From: Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Marky Mark and Calvin Klein (was Re: Scott Masden)
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 19:28:06 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <1992Nov11.184912.21340@macc.wisc.edu>
  <1992Nov11.195215.29910@Princeton.EDU>
  <Nov.12.11.08.00.1992.3178@math.rutgers.edu>

Bil Gonzalez writes:
>I heard from an industry friend yesterday that Marky Mark will soon
>have a book out that makes Madonna's SEX book look like a rewrite of
>THE SOUND OF MUSIC.  Is explores his kinky(?!) sexuality (I was told).
>It is supposed to be VERY explicit.  I'll post more as I learn more.

Let's hope this is just a *really* bad joke -- like his "music".
Frankly, I think Madonna's far sexier than he is..... I guess
I'll have to call myself a Kinsey 5.9 now.
 
() I shot an arrow into the air and it stuck.
()      -- graffito in Los Angeles
-----
[> George D. Madison | NBCS: B8f+t+w-e+s+k+a!cv | Just say NO to razors! <]
[> It's a BEAR thing -- you wouldn't understand. <|> furr@cup.portal.com <]
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: balistik@big-brother.nevada.edu (Shawn Hicks)
Subject: Re: Colorado tactics
Organization: Not yet, but we're working on it...
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 19:02:21 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.234140.14497@colorado.edu>, devin@frodo.Colorado.EDU (Sonja Orlavski) writes:
>Rod Williams (rjwill6@PacBell.COM) wrote:
>: 
>: Seems to me that all LGB employers in Colorado should
>: dismiss their heterosexual employees forthwith.
>
>Great idea...one problem.  Amendment #2 specifically singles out homosexuals
>and bisexuals.  Heterosexuals can still claim discrimination on the basis
>of sexual orientation.

Then this is the best reason to do it.  Someone posted the
description of the 14th Amendment and tried to show that
the Colorado Hate law violates the Amendment.  It doesn't
as long as it is *also* legal to discriminate against
heterosexuals.  If the Colorado courts allow one 
sexual orientation protection they have to offer them
ALL protection or violate the 14th Amendment.  It's a
trap.  Of course, since when do heterosexuals have to
worry about discrimination?



Shawn

Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: mattm@apple.com (Matthew Melmon)
Subject: Re: Congratulations!!
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 21:03:59 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.
Followup-To: soc.motss

In article <74052@apple.Apple.COM>, richard@Apple.COM (a flying squirrel)
wrote:
> 
> Patrick Raffin's .sig:
> 
> >  __       Just a French tourist,
> >  \/       doesn't speak English, nor Unix
> 
> Ce n'est pas grave.  Ils sont presque la meme chose.

Mon Dieux!  Vraiment, vous pensez, mon petit rodent?  La meme chose,
cette deux?

*Le X*
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: cjlee@netcom.com (Caroline Jean Lee)
Subject: Re: A Dumb Question, But...
Keywords: other, omnivorous, omnisexual, obliging
Organization: can't get that netcom line to stop appearing here. arrgh.
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 10:59:08 GMT

I've generally understood LGBO's "O" as other, including not just
straight allies, but also: people who have sex with members of the
same sex but don't identify as gay bi or lesbian, transvestites, and
transsexuals.

Caroline

Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: rdonahue@spdcc.com (Bob Donahue)
Subject: Re: CO-2 Ammendment PASSES 8-(
Organization: insert anything here
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 19:28:36 GMT

his@the-temple.East.Sun.COM writes:
>What about company anti-discrimination clauses?  
>Do they still hold for employees
>in Colorado?

	Mostly no.

	A company can have an EEO policy, but if it is violated
on the grounds of orientation the victim can't take the company
to court, except at the federal level.

	So, if your company never discriminates anyway, you're ok.
If they do or screw up, unless you can fight it on
your own, you're pretty much SOL.  The state doesn't see it as 
discrimination, and therefore won't let it be argued.
It's sort of a pre-determined outcome.

	It's up in the air whether having an EEO Statement constitutes 
a contract that would be binding above and beyond Amendmane 2.
Probably not since 2 is specific.
From: broughton@lambda.usask.ca
Newsgroups: soc.motss,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Colorado tactics
Date: 6 Nov 92 16:50:02 GMT
Article-I.D.: access.1992Nov6.165002.153
Reply-To: broughton@lambda.usask.ca ()
Organization: University of Saskatchewan

In article <13074@optilink.UUCP>, cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:
|>Xref: access.usask.ca soc.motss:107854 talk.politics.misc:129149
|>Path: access.usask.ca!ccu.umanitoba.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!utcsri!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!optilink!cramer
|>From: cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer)
|>Newsgroups: soc.motss,talk.politics.misc
|>Subject: Re: Colorado tactics
|>Message-ID: <13074@optilink.UUCP>
|>Date: 5 Nov 92 22:07:54 GMT
|>References: <1992Nov4.205811.2937@PacBell.COM> <1992Nov4.234140.14497@colorado.edu>
|>Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
|>Lines: 19
|>
|>In article <1992Nov4.234140.14497@colorado.edu>, devin@frodo.Colorado.EDU (Sonja Orlavski) writes:
|>> Rod Williams (rjwill6@PacBell.COM) wrote:
|>> : 
|>> : Seems to me that all LGB employers in Colorado should
|>> : dismiss their heterosexual employees forthwith.
|>> 
|>> Great idea...one problem.  Amendment #2 specifically singles out homosexuals
|>> and bisexuals.  Heterosexuals can still claim discrimination on the basis
|>> of sexual orientation.
|>> 
|>> Devin Hooker (RP90)  (SotM 7/91)  DoD #0034  devin@boulder.colorado.edu  ------
|>
|>So?  Is there a law against discrimination against heterosexuals?
|>No.

Actually, yes there are laws in Boulder, Aspen and Denver. The existing 
"no-discrimination based on sexual orientation" laws in these cities are now
applicable only to heterosexuals.

Thus there are laws against discrimination against heterosexuals.

I *KNOW* that you will be working to repeal this special status for
heterosexuals.

Darrell
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: corwin+@CMU.EDU (Scott Safier)
Subject: Re: discrimination at CMU
Originator: scotts@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University
	<1dn3qsINNj0v@mizar.usc.edu> <1992Nov10.055547.1907@spdcc.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 16:54:50 GMT

In article <1992Nov10.055547.1907@spdcc.com> dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) writes:

   Newsgroups: soc.motss
Path: crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!think.com!spdcc!dyer
   From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer)
   Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
   References: <CORWIN+.92Nov9131742@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU> <1dn3qsINNj0v@mizar.usc.edu>
   Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 05:55:47 GMT
   Lines: 17

   In article <1dn3qsINNj0v@mizar.usc.edu> adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) writes:
   >> [...] A 1990 CMU graduate, who was interviewed anonymously by
   >> Scanlan, says, "Guys who were straight but not that great in the acting
   >> field had a stronger chance of staying than the guys who had some
   >> talent but were effeminate."
   >Professional, world-class programs in the performing arts --
   >and Carnegie Mellon's Drama Department is both -- have to take
   >their student actors' "personal mannerisms" into consideration.
   >It is a brute fact of life.  

   Gad, shouldn't these students try "acting"?  I mean, not every role
   is Queenie in _Fortune and Men's Eyes_.

Gee Steve, another reason that Scanlan's article stated for kicking
students out (this time women students) was that they were too
overweight.  Do you think that a person's weight is a reason to
discriminate against them?  Do you think that "overweight" people
should try "acting" thin?

As Scanlan says in his article, "...many of the euphemisms are the
same: "not grounded", "light", "soft".  Sometimes, euphemisms are
skipped altogether.  Said one teacher, still on staff at CMU, to a
gay student after a recent scene. "You're playing a young man, not a
young girl."  And that is homophobia, for what Anthony McKay (prof at
CMU) and Mel Shapiro (past chair of Drama, now at UCLA) don't
understand it's not like a New York accent: those "mannerisms" and
"affectations" are connected to the very essence of who someone is.
The business will do what it will do with these young men, as it does
to all of us, but for the school to say, "Don't bring those colors
into your work" is asking these young actors to work without their
souls." 

Scott Safier                                   corwin+@cmu.edu
Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
        
member, T.S.A.K.C.  B0/1 f+ w- g k+ s- m(+) e++

"We do not have an anti-gay policy... The problems Boy Scouts are
having are with people trying to get in - the gay community, the
homosexuals, the atheists."
Burford Hill, Western Regional Director, Boy Scouts of America. 
5 June 1992, San Francisco Chronicle

"We don't necessarily discriminate.  We simply exclude certain types of
people."
   Lt. Col. Gerald Wellman, an ROTC instructor at the MIT,
   on the military's ban on gays
   Newsweek, May 25
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: jackies@fc.hp.com (Jackie Sheddy X6958)
Subject: From Colorado
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 12:34:34 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Fort Collins Site
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.3 PL6]


I agree that something must be done.  However, as someone pointed out in
an  earlier  posting,  if all of us queers  leave  KKKolorado,  then the
religious right has a stronghold.  They will take their fight across the
nation and we will soon have  nowhere to go  (unless, of course, we want
to emigrate to Canada ;-).

We have to stay and fight.  If we don't, someday you might.


Peace,

Jackie
jackies@hpxxx.fc.hp.com
Hate is NOT a Family Value!!
From: Furr@cup.portal.com (George Dalton Madison)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: i just like sniffing the fumes
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 19:02:35 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <1992Nov10.125139.13320@thinkage.on.ca>

Ken Dykes writes:
>>Wanna trade bore & stroke measurements?
>
>it aint the bore & stroke, its the main shaft torque that counts!

**BELIEVE** **ME**, this man knows what he's talking about....

;-{)##]
 
() B is for Basil, assaulted by bears.
-----
[> George D. Madison | NBCS: B8f+t+w-e+s+k+a!cv | Just say NO to razors! <]
[> It's a BEAR thing -- you wouldn't understand. <|> furr@cup.portal.com <]
From: jct@mips.com (Chris Thomas)
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: Re: Colorado Blues
Date: 5 Nov 92 22:13:39 GMT
Organization: Mips Technologies, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: ecstasy.mti.sgi.com

msp@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu (Michael S. Pettersen) writes:
>But in some ways it would seem
>more accurate to say that social values became more polarized.  For
>example, our increasing visibility and social acceptability have driven
>the fanatical rightwingers to attack us, whereas when we were
>invisible, they were content to let us be, more or less.

One school of thought can bring this all back around to, as the Clinton
campaign put it, "The Economy, Stupid."

There just isn't "enough" to go around in the U.S. these days (the 
definition of "enough" is a personal one that's different for everyone).
When people perceive that there isn't "enough", they start looking for
ways to get it from others.  "If there aren't enough jobs at the steel
mill, perhaps I can save my own job by getting rid of those nasty
faggots."  

Now, you'll rarely hear this sentiment expressed so directly, but it's
just a primal survival instinct.  "If there's not enough for both of us,
I'll make sure I have enough for me."  Way Back When, there *was* "enough"
for most... until those nasty blacks came along, then those pesky women
who wanted to vote, then those boy-loving queers....

People are hurting because of our sick, sick economy; and this only makes
people all the more desperate to claw their way to The Top any way they
can.  For those of us who have been denied the same chances at the Dream
for years, decades, or centuries, this makes things all the more difficult.

-- 
Chris Thomas                                                (415) 390-4118
S4/7 b g+ l y+ z+ n+ o+ x-/+ a++ u v-/+ j++                jct@mti.sgi.com
Newsgroups: soc.motss
From: bob@dolores.Stanford.EDU (Bob Lodenkamper)
Subject: Inconsistency re CO boycott
Organization: Computer Systems Laboratory, Stanford University
Distribution: soc
Date: 5 Nov 92 19:01:57

I've noticed that when the subject of a boycott comes up, some
conservatives, free-marketeers and/or libertarians are often vocally
against the boycott.  This seems bizarre to me, for how can someone
who believes (as I do) that there shouldn't be financial entitlements,
believe that Colorado is somehow "entitled" to its "fair share" of our
disposable income (and that of our supporters, as well).  I think even
a supporter of the usual entitlements would find this "obligation" to
be ludicrous.

Would someone arguing the anti-boycott case care to explain just why
"business as usual" should prevail in CO without relying on the
basically irrelevant fact that a successful boycott could hurt
everyone in the state.

- Bob
From: aberson@enh.nist.gov
Newsgroups: soc.motss
Subject: RE: discrimination at CMU
Date: 10 Nov 92 23:41:11 GMT
Organization: NIST

In a previous article, adolphso@mizar.usc.edu (adolphson) wrote:
>I don't understand why you keep harping on talent.  

I don't understand why you are trying to apologize for people who 
remove students from an acting department simply because they
are gay.  Their so-called mannerisms were used as an excuse, but
it seemed quite apparent to me from the original article that
even the Bob Sarvers of the department were removed.

>Performing 
>arts programs are not like academic programs, and things that
>wouldn't matter if you were studying chemistry -- such as the
>pitch of your voice, how you stand, what you do with your hands
>when you talk, how you walk, your body -- *do* matter if you
>want to be an actor.  If an actor is in such poor control of
>his voice and body that he camps it up during every scene,
>then I really don't care how much "talent" he has.

Any actor who "camps it up" in every scene doesn't have "talent."
I don't think this has been the case here.

>Yes, that is what I mean by "personal mannerisms".  I would
>imagine that the school also tries to get students to lose
>regional accents.

I don't think this would be appropriate.  A good actor would lose
(or gain) any accent in order to best play the role.
Similarly, a good actor would lose (or gain) any type of mannerisms
required for the role.  It is apparent to me that students and
teachers were discriminated against because they were not heterosexual.

Scott, did the CMU Theatre Department ever do any gay theatre?

Sim Aberson   Ft. Lauderdale, FL   aberson%3328.span@sdsc.edu

Hate, bigotry, and discrimination are not family values, even in
Colorado and Tampa.