HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lbr@holos0.uucp (Len Reed)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Glavine
Keywords: Tidbits
Date: 7 Oct 92 14:13:04 GMT
Organization: Holos Software, Inc.

In article <17937@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> zuhars@madrone.eecs.ucdavis.edu (Gary Frog Baseball Huckabay) writes:
>Len "Confusius" Reed writes:
>
>>If you're arguing about who's the best pitcher in the NL, then this
>>has to be taken into account.  Glavine is arguably the best pitcher
>>in the NL.  (At least we NL fans can argue about such things; in the
>>AL it's not even a topic that can be argued.)
>
>Huh?  I'm afraid I don't understand this.  Could you explain?

Which part, Gary?

For the first part (arguing who's the best pitcher in the NL), I'd say that
Glavine's record over the past two seasons is quite impressive.  He didn't
pitch well down the stretch this year, but he had a cracked rib, and that
should be taken into account if you're evaluating his value as a pitcher.
If you're evaluating his single-season performance, though, I think you
have to say he had a great first half and then tailed off a lot.

For the second part, based on season-in season-out performance, Rocket
Roger is the best pitcher in the American League and has been for years.
I don't see how this is even arguable.
From: rickc@wrigley.corp.sgi.com (Richard Casares)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: World-Series ...... Jays have the edge
Date: 15 Oct 92 22:45:38 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

In article <Bw6K9B.Ez7@ns1.nodak.edu>, sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram
Hariharan ) writes:
|> 
|> But there is this factor called luck....and I feel
|> the Braves are a lucky team.
|> 
|> S.H
|> Forever Twins'
|> 

And Twins fans, if anyone, know all about luck....

-- 
+===================================================================+
| Rick Casares			            Silicon Graphics        |	
| cubfan@wrigley.corp.sgi.com		    2011 N. Shoreline Blvd  |
| "Just wait till next year."               Mountain View, CA 94039 |
+===================================================================+
From: sgs@stein.u.washington.edu (Steven Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Birthdays
Date: 8 Oct 92 21:05:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Oct8.210531.10216
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

Baseball Birthdays

October 8
Wally Moses, 1910
Paul Splittorff, 1946
Enos Cabell, 1949
George "Catfish" Metkovich, 1921
Jeff Lahti, 1956
Mike Morgan, 1959
Ping Bodie, 1887
Donie Bush, 1887
Danny Murtaugh, 1917
Jerry Reed, 1955

--Steve
-- 
 sgs@u.washington.edu             * 
 Steve Smith                      * "We want a pitcher, not a belly itcher." 
 University of Washington HR-20   *    			-- Bill Plummer
 Seattle, WA 98195                *
From: sport@vax1.mankato.msus.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Baseball Computer Game
Date: 16 Oct 92 04:09:29 GMT
Organization: Mankato State University


This may not be the correct place on the net for this message, but I need some
help.

I am looking for a copy of a baseball game called 
                "Earl Weavers Baseball"

My copy is shot and the don't sell it any more.  They have a newer verson (EWB
II) that is out.  Can anyone help me get a copy of the orginal?

ADthanksVANCE

Mike
sport@vax1.mankato.msus.edu
From: gajarsky@pilot.njin.net (Bob Gajarsky)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Braves win 5-1
Date: 9 Oct 92 05:37:18 GMT
Organization: Somewhere in Hoboken

that's what makes jack morris and dan gladden so great.  they psychicly
 help their fellow ballplayers.  for instance, thos curve balls that
 don't break properly?  jack morris playing the psychic again.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: alchemy@cs1.bradley.edu (Mike Swiston)
Subject: Re: The Ex-Cub Factor
Organization: salt of the earth in open wounds.
Date:  8 Oct 92 19:07:29 GMT

paula@koufax.cv.hp.com (Paul Andresen) writes:

% So far, everyone has been ignoring THE most important factor in determining
% the playoff winners. It is an old, and nearly infallable predictor that the
% team with the most ex-Cubs will lose in the post season. With that in mind,
% here goes:

%       Atlanta            Pittsburgh        Toronto      Oakland
%       -------            ----------        -------      -------
%       Damon Berryhill    Lloyd McClendon   Joe Carter   Dennis Eckersley
%                          Gary Varsho       Pat Tabler 
%                          Danny Jackson

Did Atlanta get rid of Mike Bielecki already?
And don't forget Oakland manager Tony LaRussa...

% Anyone know where this thing started? It's been around for a while. I'm
% tempted to say that Mike Royko started it, but I'm not certain.

He did.
From: thornley@milli.cs.umn.edu (David H. Thornley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: NLCS Game #5 at 9:41
Date: 12 Oct 92 17:20:39 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.

In article <7519@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> psg+@pitt.edu (Paul S Galvanek) writes:
>In article <1992Oct12.032828.9604@Princeton.EDU> niepornt@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Marc Nieporent) writes:
>>
>>>Once again we see that a WALK is definitely not as vaulable as a HIT.
>>
>>Once again, we see people setting up straw men.  Nobody ever said it was, 
>>unless there's a man on first and he's slow.
>
>With all due respect folks, no one may have used the exact wording but, many
>here have argued that OBP is a more important stat that batting average, or rbisetc and no matter how you slice it that argument - OBP > BA - boils down to
>walks are as important as hits.
>
Look, is HR/AB a better stat for evaluating players than BA?  Does that
mean home runs are not more valuable than lesser hits?  OBP by itself is
not much better than BA, and is not as useful as SLG.  OBP and SLG tell
a lot about a player's hitting.

Walks are *not* as good as singles, in general, and nobody except Ted
Williams has ever said so or implied so.  If you think somebody has implied
that, I'd like to see how you can slice the argument to indicate that.

>Simply not true!  Walks CAN be as vauluable as hits but that depends on the 
>circumstances.  And since a cummulative number like OBP tells you nothing
>about how, when or why a walk was obtained it is an utterly meaningless stat
>by itself.
>
OBP doesn't even tell you how much the guy walked.  Anyway, BA tells you
nothing about how, when, or why a hit was obtained; since it is possible to
have a hit that becomes meaningless in retrospect, shall we conclude that
BA is an utterly meaningless stat?

>>
>>But then again, it's infinitely better than an out.
>>
>
>Why is it?  With a man on third a out the walk and the out produce exactly
>the same result - NO RUN!
>
King has actually been known to hit the ball safely this year.  If Bonds
makes an out, the inning is over right then.  If he walks, King has a
chance to drive in Van Slyke *and* Bonds.  (I do agree that Bonds might
have seen something close to the strike zone with a decent hitter coming
up behind him.)

David Thornley
"The second type of fan, which can understand something once explained
to him, is also valuable.  The third type..." - Niccolo Machiavelli
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: doctor8@jhuvms.hcf.jhu.edu (Jason Abner Miller)
Subject: Re: Weird day at the ballparks
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University - HCF
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 23:40:00 GMT

>My turn! My turn!
>The announcer: Bob Uecker. The year 1983. The event 'The Brewers' homerun  
>inning'. (Money is given to a fan if a Brewer hits a homerun).
>There hadn't been a winner for a long time and quite a bit of money had been  
>built up. At the beginning of the inning Uecker said "this is it" 
>"There'll be a home run today" . There was. The next day, Pat Hughes (His  
>partner) tried to get him to repeat the prediction but Bob just said
>"Nope. I don't have the good feeling today". 
>That was the only time all season that Uecker predicted a homerun.
> [In anticipation of a certain question: Yes.]
>So he was 1/1 with his predictions. Small sample size, but still good.

	Undoubtedly the WORST type of prediction is when your hometown
announcer calls a dinger for the OTHER team.
	Do any of the two remaining Mets fans out there remember the night
of September 11, 1987 at Shea Stadium?  The Mets were beating the Cardinals
4 to 1 in the 9th inning, and if they won, would be just 1/2 games in back
of 1st place.  Shea was very pumped up, and the momentum was very obvious.
All Roger McDowell had to do was get one out, and the Mets knew they had
a shot at the pennant.
	Willie McGee had a 2-out RBI single to make it 4-2.  Terry Pendleton
stepped to the plate with a man on.  Tying run.  Tim McCarver says:
	"Pendleton has 10 Home Runs this year for St. Louis.  I'm sure that
right now, he'd like nothing more than to get Number 11, and tie this thing
up for the Cards."

	Next pitch by McDowell:  High fly ball, DEEP to Center Field ... GONE.
Tie game.  Orosco loses it in the 10th.  The Mets were not eliminated for
another 2 weeks, but after this game, it was all over.  I never forgave
Tim McCarver for that little throwaway line which would go on to make
Pendleton's career.

							Jason Miller
"And McDowell doesn't look to happy about that one" - Tim McCarver, 9/11/87
From: z_copeab@ccsvax.sfasu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Which team most improved?
Date: 8 Oct 92 17:58:49 GMT
Article-I.D.: ccsvax.1992Oct8.115849.1421
Organization: Stephen F. Austin State University

In article <39153@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>, demers@cs.ucsd.edu (David DeMers) writes:
> In article <2OCT199209215691@wild.ucis.vill.edu> mcclure@wild.ucis.vill.edu (MCCLURE HAROLD) writes:
> 
>>Phillies for most improved team???? NOT!!! I would pick Montreal, but again this
>>is very unscientific.
> 
> Well, I don't know if the Phillies were particularly improved...
> but they did have a decimated pitching staff.  Apparently the
> 1992 Phillies are the first team ever to lead the league in
> runs and finish last (and lead the league in runs allowed...)

	The 1930 Phillies may have done this as well.

Brandon Cope
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: rstimets@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (robert and stimets)
Subject: Re: Pittsburg Fans
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 22:23:03 GMT

In article <7659@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> jrmst8+@pitt.edu (Joseph R Mcdonald) writes:
>In article <26285@oasys.dt.navy.mil> kiviat@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Brian Kiviat) writes:
>>Does anyone know what the average attendence per game was for the Pirates
>>this year. If the Pitt fans are so great, this better be high.
>
>Their attendance was equivelant (when you adjust for market size) to the Dodgers
>and Angels drawing 5.0 million each, the Cubs and Sox drawing 3.5 million each,
>the Mets and Yankees drawing 4.5 million each.  None of those teams have EVER
>drawn that much.  More Pittsburghers per capita saw live baseball games the
>last three years than any team in baseball.
>
Not that I'd lend any credence to this measure of attendence-per-capita, but
still: Cincinnati outdrew Pittsburgh by a quarter of a million fans, and they
are a smaller city with a second place team.

RStimets



Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: shadow@r-node.gts.org (Jay Chu)
Subject: Re: How do I love Gruber, let me count the ways!
Keywords: Gruber, game #2
Organization: R-node Public Access UNIX Information System (416-249-5366)
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 22:10:52 GMT

In article <1992Oct9.050129.11061@ramsey.cs.laurentian.ca> bazz@ramsey.cs.laurentian.ca (Denis R. Bazinet) writes:
>
B
>Gruber, in game#2: 2-RUN HOMER and DOUBLE and SCORED A RUN

Sorry to rain on your parade, but one game doesn't give Gruber an outstanding
player award.  Ok I admit his defense is good when he feels up to fielding
the balls.  But his hitting sucks.  If I were Cito, I'll ask Gruber to sac
bunt if the situations call for, instead of letting him strike out or hit
into a double play.
-- 
        ______                shadow@r-node.gts.org
       | |__| |   If it's there and you can see it       - it's real
       |  ()  |   If it's there and you can't see it     - it's transparent
       |______|   If it's not there and you can't see it - you erased it!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: doctor8@jhuvms.hcf.jhu.edu (Jason Abner Miller)
Subject: Re: Cito Manages reasonable in Game #1
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University - HCF
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 02:18:00 GMT

In article <Bvv69E.I0u@cs.dal.ca>, niguma@ug.cs.dal.ca (Gordon Niguma) writes...
>  Ok, then when would YOU have taken out Jack Morris. Prettty easy to say that
>it's dumb AFTER Baines was rounding the bases. Especially after Morris had
>pitched 6 straight consecutive scoreless innings. Remember Tom Kelly in the
>7th game of the World Series last year. Some idiot he was leaving Jack Morris
>in. 
>  So when would you have taken out Cone last night eh? After the fifth probably.
>Then you could have drained the entire bullpen and wasted a brilliant 
>performance by Cone. 
>  You're obviously the kind of guy who seems to think he's an expert AFTER the
>fact. I think it's one thing to question Cito's move, but without the outcome
>known and the given information it wasn't exactly a horrific move as you seem
>to state.
>By the way what difference does it make whether it's a home game or not? 
	Fact:  The Jays have one of the better bullpens in the A.L.
	They've got the Tom-inator
	They've got Duane Ward.
	Hell, they even gave up Greg Myers to get Mark Eichhorn back.
I think that David Wells would be quality for any manager whose name isn't
"Cito".  And Mike Timlin ain't nothing to sneeze at.
	Meanwhile, over in the Bay, we've got Kelly Downs.  We've got Shawn
Hillegas.  Egad, we've even got Rick Honeycutt, 8 years after he was good.
When Eck isn't pitching, Jeff Russell comes in to get out one batter (see game 
1), and blows a save.  SO, it should be a given that the Jays' pen dominates.
	ERGO:  When a 60-year old Morris, who's thrown gopher balls earlier,
goes into the 9th of a tie game, why not use fireballing Duane Ward, especially
when the numbers would indicate that he can get out Baines, McGwire, and co.?
Not that I'm second-guessing Cito, but the first game is important, and
leaving in an old pitcher who has had PRIOR success in the playoffs, is a 
bit risky.
	Just my 2 cents worth.  I also second-guessed bringing in Russell
when LaRussa was only 1 out away from the Eck in a one-run game.  Oh well

							Jason A. Miller

A's in 6, Braves in 5, Either team in 7.
"So, with 2 outs and nobody on here in the 6th, the Brewers have the bases
loaded against Sanderson ... Wait a minute, what'd I just say??
					-	Phil Rizzuto, Yanks announcer
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: steinman@me.utoronto.ca (David Steinman)
Subject: Re: What role for Jack Morris?
Organization: UofT Mechanical Engineering
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 18:07:36 GMT

maceache@fox.nstn.ns.ca (Tim Maceachern) writes:

>The Globe and Mail, "Canada's National Newspaper", had an article today
>which included a line to the effect that Cito used a 3-an rotation in the
>ALCS, with pitchers pitching on 3 days rest.  The next line said that would
>be changed to four in the World Series.  Unfortunately it didn't say whether
>that was a 4-man rotation or 4 days rest.  I assume it is both.  Seems to
>me the ideal lineup would be Cone, Key, Guzman then (ack) Morris.

In today's Toronto Star, Morris said something to the effect of "you'll
have to kill me to keep me from starting Game 1 of the WS"  Get out yer
wooden stakes boys!
--
Dave!
From: tmiller@prism.gatech.EDU (Thomas Miller)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: NLCS game 5
Date: 12 Oct 92 19:27:32 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology



  I can't believe that someone hasn't posted about this yet, given
the number of Braves and Pirates fans on this group...

  It was Pittsburgh, 7-1.  Avery collapsed in the 1st inning after
giving up 5 hits (4 of them doubles) and 4 runs.  Each of the
pitchers used in relief (Smith, Leibrandt, Freeman) gave up one
more run at some point.  Actually, Stanton was in there somewhere,
too.  Bonds had 2 hits, too...  
  But the most amazing part was Bob Walk, pitching for the Pirates.
He walked a lot of batters, but gave up only one run on three hits
and went the distance.  A truly impressive performance, moreso
considering that he seldom lasted long in the regular season.


  On to Tuesday, Game 6, in Atlanta : Wakefield vs Glavine.




-- 
Thomas Miller      Georgia Tech Network Services        GT EE 1992 (?!) 
WORK: (404) 853-0254 / Rich Bldg Rm 127, 258 4th St  Atlanta, Ga. 30332
HOME: (404) 351-1017 / 1185 Collier Rd NW apt 2A     Atlanta, Ga. 30318 
Internet:  tmiller@prism.gatech.edu   or   thomas.miller@oit.gatech.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: hutto@SMTC.engr.scarolina.edu (Brent Hutto)
Subject: Re: Was Bream Out?
Reply-To: hutto@smtc.engr.scarolina.edu
Organization: NIST Southeast Manufacturing Technology Center
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 19:59:23 GMT

In article <1bju8mINN18d@rave.larc.nasa.gov>, bandwen@eagle.larc (bando) writes:
>From where I was watching the game (not real close to the TV),
>Sid Bream looked out or very very close to being out at home.
>Is it just me or what?
>   --bando

    I'll tell you what I noticed on the replays. Did you see just how
    close the umpire was when he made the call. From his eyes to the
    plate couldn't have been more that eight feet. He was practically
    looking *down* at the play. I might doubt a call as often as the
    next guy, but no way I doubt a guy standing right there with a
    perfect view of a bang-bang play no matter what it looks like on
    TV, super-slow-mo or no.

-------------------------------
Brent Hutto
hutto@SMTC.engr.scarolina.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: st902415@pip.cc.brandeis.edu (Adam Levin)
Subject: Sean McD
Reply-To: st902415@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 04:11:55 GMT

Is it just me, or is every full count pitch being refered to as "the 
payoff pitch" by Sean McDonaugh? I guess if it is a 3-2 game in the
top of the ninth to David Justice (or some such situation), no big 
deal. But I heard it several times last week in the 13-4 game, too. All
I'm asking is for a new idiom, Sean. 

Speaking of tonight's 3-2 game, I continue to be amazed at the super-
duper-slo-mo of a knuckleball. I remember CBS using it on Candiotti last
year, and it looked great on Wakefield too. Van Slyke said in the post
game interview how much Wakefield's pitching lifted the team. Might Leyland
bring him back earlier than normal if the Series is on the line? As Timmy
Mac said, he doesn't care what people say about him.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: roberts@leland.Stanford.EDU (John Jacob Roberts)
Subject: Re: Eck Chokes Again!!
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 21:28:44 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.185926.11082@cs.cornell.edu> tedward@cs.cornell.edu (Edward [Ted] Fischer) writes:
>In article <1992Oct13.172017.21055@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> exby@pogo.Colorado.EDU (|J| Exby) writes:
>>darrell.crone@ozonehole.new-orleans.la.us (Darrell Crone)  writes:
>>
>
>Thigpen '90	4-6 W-L, 1.83 ERA, 88.2 IP, 57-8 Sv-BS
>Eckersley '92	7-1 W-L, 1.91 ERA, 80 IP, 51-3 Sv-BS
>
>It's quite debatable which of the two had the better season.  But
>Eck's team won the division.  Thigpen's didn't.  Personally, I think
>that Eck's 1990 season beats both.  An 0.61 ERA, 48 Sv, 4-2 record, in
>73.1 IP.  Anybody know how many (few?) blown saves?  He only gave up 9

Eckersley blew two saves that year.  The reasons Eckersley (and Thigpen)
weren't considered for Cy Young and/or MVP in '90 were simple.  Rickey
Henderson had a career year (which is saying a hell of a lot) and Bob Welch
was credited with 27 wins.  This year, there are no such 'obvious' MVP
or Cy Young candidates, leading to the speculation over Eckersley.  In a
just world, Eckersley wouldn't have had his '90 year in '90.  If you'll
remember, Rollie Fingers had a similar year in '81 (or was that '82) and
got the MVP (and, if I'm not mistaken, the Cy Young).  I guess what this
boils down to is that, while Eck may not deserve the Cy Young/MVP this year,
neither do many others.

Jake
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 19:05:24 EDT
From: kate the great <AMY105@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: John Kruk on Letterman

Due to popular demand, John Kruk will be on Late Night With David Letterman,
supposedly either tonight or tomorrow.  He was on once before and Dave liked
him so much that he practically begged him to come back... His appearance all
depends on his recovery from his surgery.  I didn't see anything about his
appearance in the Philadelphia paper today, but you might want to check it out
anyway, just in case.   --kate
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: gerry@macadam.mpce.mq.edu.au (Gerry Myerson)
Subject: Re: Predictions
Originator: gerry@macadam.mpce.mq.edu.au
Organization: School of MPCE, Macquarie University, Australia.
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 01:43:51 GMT


In article <17929@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>, zuhars@madrone.eecs.ucdavis.edu (Gary Frog Baseball Huckabay) writes:

> [...] This year, 112 brave respondents ... prognosticated what the results of
> this year's pennant chase would be.
> 
> 	The scoring system is pretty much the same this year as last -
> 1 point for each position OFF the prediction was, per team.  In
> addition, just for fun, I SUBTRACTED a point if someone predicted the
> first place team correctly.  In addition, I've added what I like to
> call the 'Huckabay/Seattle' penalty.  That is, if you choose a team
> for first place in a division, and it finishes DEAD LAST, you get one
> more point.  Scoring is like golf - the lower the better.  In
> addition, the NL score is multiplied by 4/3, to account for smaller
> divisions.  I KNOW it's not a great way to handle the difference, but
> too bad.  If you don't like it, do it yourself.

If I've got this right, it means that someone who predicted that 1992 would 
be an exact repeat of 1991 would have scored 46.33, good enough for 9th place
(out of 112!). 

[...]

> Predictor	AL	NL	TOT	Z Score (Std Dev from Mean)
> Gary Huckabay	17	6.67	23.67	4.18
> Greg Gottlieb	16	21.33	37.33	2.45
> Valentine	26	14.67	40.67	2.03
> Greg Spira	22	18.67	40.67	2.03
> Bill Guilford	27	17.33	44.33	1.56
> D Doubleday	22	22.67	44.67	1.52
> Doug White	30	16	46	1.35
> Yaska Sankar	26	20	46	1.35

  Pete Repeat 25 21.67 46.33

> Bob Harrison	24	22.67	46.67	1.27

9th out of 112 being not too shabby, let me be the first to submit my 
"predictions" for 1993:

Tor, Mil, Bal, Cle-NY (tie), Det, Bos; Oak, Min, Chi, Tx, Cal-KC (tie), Sea; 
Pit, Mon, StL, Chi, NY, Phil; Atl, Cin, SD, Hou, SF, LA. 

[...]

> *  Gary Huckabay  * 

Gerry Myerson
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Braves..2-up
Date: 7 Oct 92 22:23:50 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


Now the Braves are going to be 2-0 and now the Pirates should
pray that the home-field and the Wakefield drag them out
of this mess.

BTW, Mr.Regular Season broke his hitless streak with a single
in the 7th which ignited a 4-run Pirate rally. However, the
Braves answered back with 5 runs to hold down the uprising.

S.H
Forever Twins