HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: vja8569@tm0006.lerc.nasa.gov (Vicki J. Adkins)
Subject: RE:LOV
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center / Cleveland, Ohio
Date:  9 Nov 1992 09:09 EST  


Hey everyone I just finally learned how to use our other e-mail system here
and found a bunch of e-mail messages from members of the Loving group.  I
was not ignoring all of you - I just never got the messages until today.
Well now I know how to use the system so I'll get any messages that you e-mail
to me.  Hope you didn't give up on me.  If anyone can't do their daily 
update just let me know.  I tape Loving everyday so I can post whenever
someone needs a backup -ok.  Sorry again for not answering your e-mails
but now I'll be able to read everday and won't miss them.

				Vicki

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mssmith@unix.amherst.edu (MELISSA STEPHANIE SMITH)
Subject: Re: SB:Mason and Julia in chambers
Organization: Amherst College
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 05:48:02 GMT

Sucheta Doshi (sdoshi@olaf.wellesley.edu) wrote:
: In article <rek1.720464625@Ra.MsState.Edu> rek1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Robert Kennedy) writes:
: >Okay, did y'all all enjoy the scene with Mason and Julia in his chambers as
: >much as I did?  That bantering back and forth was wonderful.  And I loved the
: >way she got him off guard with the kisses and declarations of love.  I was
: >hoping that they would make out right on the desk, but no such luck.  As
: >great as these two are together, they really make the sexual frustration and
: >tension between their characters real!
: >
: >MHO
: >Suzanna

: I LOVE SB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   I loved this scene too!!!! It's not fair that
: in two months I'm going to lose Mason and Julia.  NOOOOOOOO..this can't
: be happening!!!!!
Well be glad that you have been cruelly deprived of it two months early, 
because your *@#&^$! affiliate decided that Maury the mega cheese-bal Povich
was better.  It's so unfair and I am very bitter and I wish that I had seen
this scene instead of just reading about it and I am in SB withdrawal and it is very painful.  AGHHHHHHHHHHHAGHHHHHHHHHHH!
(Sorry, I'm just a little upset right now.)

: Mason and Julia forever.
Hear, hear.  

Melissa "I'm not bitter at all" Smith

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: raymond.hodgson@rose.com (raymond hodgson)
Subject: Re:amc: clinton's pre
Organization: Rose Media Inc, Toronto, Ontario.
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 01:38:16 GMT
X-Gated-By: Usenet <==> RoseMail Gateway (v1.70)


Date Entered: 11-13-92 20:32

 Mc> This just occured to me.  While I was watching Good Morning America
 Mc> this  morning, they mentioned that Clinton was holding a press
 Mc> conference this afternoon (thurs -- Nov. 12th) at 1pm EST.  Does that
 Mc> mean that I will miss it?  Will I eventually see it?  How does the ABC
 Mc> stations handle  things like that?  I will be interested in reading the
 Mc> updates if that is the case.  Just thought I would ask. . .


 Mc> Melissa (I hate soap interrupts!!!!) McGuire
 Mc> mcguire@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov

        In Canada we got AMC on CBC at 1:00, and again on ABC at 3:00
        (in place of General Hospital which wasn't shown).  AMC and
        General Hospital are shown on different channels in Canada.

        Raymond.



... New Mail not found.  Start whine-pout sequence? (Y/N)
--- Blue Wave/QWK v2.10
---
   RoseMail 2.00 : Usenet: Rose Media - Hamilton (416) 575-5363
Organization: Sophomore, H&SS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 23:46:52 -0500 
From: Jennifer Allyson Turner <jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: GH: General Comments

I didn't see GH on Friday, but I assume they replayed the Cheryl Will
scene on Monday (yah?).  So about Tiffany and Bobbie:  I think they were
both good.  The looks on their faces were so REALISTIC.  Well, how I
would imagine two people would look faced with those circumstances. 
Can't say much for Tony and Sean, though.  Does anyone remember THEIR
initial reactions?  I coulda sworn Sean looked relieved.

I also liked the "Scott and Dom Spend Their First Night Together"
scenes.  I especially loved when Scotty was dancing around the room
while Dom was changing.  He is so funny and adorable.  And Mike, I SWEAR
Scotty has dimples!

This Felicia thing is getting out of hand, but I still wonder why Mac's
the only person concerned.  Sean has the worst police instincts of any
PC commisioner (or cop for that matter) EVER.  Somebody PLEASE fire him
and get someone with intelligence in there.

How many people think Bobbie will regain custody of Lucas?  I think she
will.  It's hard for me to think of things that Tiffany could throw at
her in court.  She could bring up the blood relative thing, but Cheryl
specifically asked Bobbie and Tony and they WERE Lucas' parents for
eighteen months.  What else could she say?

I know that she could bring up the past history of Lucas, but I don't
see how this would hurt Bobbie, and there doesn't seem to be any other
evidence in Tiff's favor.  Guess we'll have to wait and see.

Jenn
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jberetta@lib.uwo.ca (Janet Beretta)
Subject: DOOL: WHY?
Organization: University of Western Ontario, London
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 15:38:08 GMT
Originator: jberetta@lib.uwo.ca

I just wanted to voice my opinion about Wednesday's show. I thought it
was GREAT! Wide ranges of characters interacting, nothing to get bored
with. The thing with Kim moving along quickly. I was quite satisfied.
It was a little more interesting than the regular filler Wednesday.

Except for Bo and Carly. Now I am not among the league of Carly
haters. I DO hate that she is on so much. WHY oh WHY was she on
yesterday? Why did the show start with her and Bo. It was boring! I
hate this kissy, kissy little interaction that goes on between them
all the time. We aren't subjected to everyone else's little intimate
exchanges. Why them? With the rest of the cast you see meaningful
intimacy such as Kim's dependent expression of need and love for
Phillip or Jennifer telling Jack that he's wonderful and that she
loves him. 

Now I don't mind fun, like the light hearted stuff we used to see with
Roman and Marlena, Roman (Drake) and Diana and Bo and Hope. But this
drivel makes me gag! There's too much potentially good stuff they
could be writing for right now and they're wasting airtime on Bo and
Carly's flowers! Yuck! Just so that they can get her token scene for
each show. Just all IMO.

Anyone want to volunteer to track how may shows per month she is NOT
on? It might be interesting statistically.

Figeroo 
 


-- 
*  Janet Beretta                  | " Sometimes I feel like I can't   *
*  University of Western Ontario  |   even sing 		      *
*  Libraries			  |   I'm very scared for this world  *
*  jberetta@lib.uwo.ca            |   I'm very scared for me."  R.E.M.*
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kmadden@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Karen T Madden)
Subject: SIS: who's the oldest
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 21:07:43 GMT


Okay, Alex is the oldest, then Teddy, then Georgie, and Frankie is the 
youngest.  I've been watching since the show began and I am _convinced_ that 
this is how they line up.  I know that in my family, I, the youngest, am the 
one who "takes care of everyone else" like Georgie does.  And my sister who is 
the second oldest was almost but not quite as ornery as Teddy.  So I don't 
think it's fair to assume that G is the oldest or T is either.  Regardless, my 
line-up is based on info from the show, not my personal experience.

--Karen

P.S.  I can't _wait_ for this week's show!!!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: zaccaria@mtl.mit.edu (Carolyn Zaccaria)
Subject: Re: LOV:  Update - WED 04 NOV & AMC crossoverings...
Organization: MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 17:43:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.193429.751@oz.plymouth.edu> patstew@oz.plymouth.edu (Pat Steward) writes:
>>
>>(BTW, the role of Clay Alden is being played by Dennis (someone)
>>in Larkin Malloy's absense :)
>Hi, I'm one of the AMC crossover people!

To Debbie from Genrad, thanks for the support to get me over to Loving!
At this time, I don't think i can handle it. But i will keep it in
mind. I taped it one day but have such a hard time keeping up with
AMC, that would be another 2 1/2 hours more of watching, then there
is the discussion! I will try and keep it in mind tho, promise!

>Does anyone know why Larkin Malloy is absent???  I've only been
>reading the "LOV" headings for about two weeks and haven't seen any
>related discussion.

Yea, what did he go back to Italy to stomp on some grapes or throw
himself out of a window and get arrested? :-) Geez, I wouldn't be
surprised if one day he comes back to PV as the not-much-missed Travis
Montgomery! It's funny too, when he first arrived in PV and I thought
he was really gorgeous and liked Travis, but then after the conversations
on the net in AMC and everyBUDy hated his notrils, i began to too. You
guys must influence me! :-) 

CAZ
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jberetta@lib.uwo.ca (Janet Beretta)
Subject: DOOL: Happy, Happy Razzie!
Organization: University of Western Ontario, London
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 13:57:25 GMT
Originator: jberetta@lib.uwo.ca

Hippo Birdie dear ewe
Hippo Birdie dear ewe
Hippo Birdie dear Razziepoo
Hippo Birdie dear ewe!

Sissy Figgy
-- 
*  Janet Beretta                  | " Sometimes I feel like I can't   *
*  University of Western Ontario  |   even sing 		      *
*  Libraries			  |   I'm very scared for this world  *
*  jberetta@lib.uwo.ca            |   I'm very scared for me."  R.E.M.*
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mcmahon@nd.edu (Sheila M. McMahon)
Subject: ATWT: Well I don't believe it!!
Organization: OUC, University of Notre Dame
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 15:14:47 GMT

If you haven't watched Monday's show yet, you may want to stop reading right
now. If you have watched Monday's show, skip on down...































Hal's dead??? Yeah right!! I don't believe it!!! I think Joe Bailey and the 
Crime Commission are just saying that so that the Harpers think he's dead.
He'll just lay low until he can testify against the Harpers, and then he'll
"raise from the dead". You would think, though, that Babs would demand proof
that he's dead, like to see the body. After all she went through with James, 
the number of times he "died", you would think that she would never again 
believe that someone was dead unless she saw the body for herself.

I did enjoy the last scene with Babs telling Frantic that "Hal's dead and 
it's all your fault. Her nostrils were at the ready, waiting until today's
episode to begin flaring.

I loved the scenes with Kirk and Ellie. They were highly emotional!! I have
just one beef, and that's with Douglas Marland. Hey Dougie... Must you 
constantly employ the same plot devices?? They are so predictable. I just 
knew that when Kirk went back home, there would be a note waiting for him.
He hasn't read it yet, but odds are that she's left town for parts unknown.

Can't wait to see the fight that Tonio and Duncan are bound to have today.
I knew that Tonio would not make it to the door without Duncan grabbing him!

All in all, Monday's show was fabulous!!

TTFN,
Irish
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: bkrumsee@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Barb Krumsee)
Subject: Re: GL: Jenna off stage
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 16:58:34 GMT



In article <92318.104534DBF106@psuvm.psu.edu> <DBF106@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>I have two comments to make:
>
>1)  This is my first post, so if I made it through please let me know.
>
>2)  Did anyone watch 'Wheel of Fortune' last night?  That's right, Jenna
>    was on trying to win money for some charity, but I don't think she won
>    anything.  Did anyone else see it?
> Please reply.
>                               Thanx,
>                                       David.

I didn't see it last night but on Wednesday Frank was on and didn't win 
anything. Ryan from Y&R won a little that night.

Barb
-- 
*******************************************************************************
   Barb Krumsee                                    The Ohio State University
   Barb.Krumsee@osu.edu                            College of Education
*******************************************************************************
From: sdoshi@olaf.wellesley.edu (Sucheta Doshi)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: GH: WARNING: NOT FOR THE HUMOR-IMPAIRED (was Re: GH: okay how about-- I hate Bill)
Date: 6 Nov 92 06:14:06 GMT
Organization: Wellesley College

In article <8eyK2LK00UhW83Ci45@andrew.cmu.edu> jt3j+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jennifer Allyson Turner) writes:
>WARNING:  NOT FOR THE HUMOR-IMPAIRED
>
>I like Mac because he and Felicia have the potential to do great things
>to bring back the adventuresomeness of GH, but BILE??  I'll gladly work
>him into (or out of) the plot.  Let's see...
>
>Oh, I got it.  At the last moment, Bile realizes that the painting
>didn't mean as much to him as Holy does.  He immediately rushes off to
>find her and tell her that he forgives her and that they can run away
>together.  He'll protect her from the long arm of the law.  He finds her
>in her apartment, hostage to the art cohorts.  They take him hostage as
>well.  They plead disgustingly for their lives, but it doesn't work. 
>One of the cohorts aims the gun at Holy, but Bill jumps in front of it. 
>Fortunately, he's shot dead and Holy is as well (they wind up in each
>other's arms and other stuff that would make you hurl if I mentioned it
>so I won't).  
>
>Anyway, there's a GIGANTIC double funeral (you know, all their enemies
>have to attend) complete with two REALLY DEAD-LOOKING corpses.  We see
>the closing of the caskets, the drive to the cemetery, and the placing
>of the caskets in the graves face-down, so even if by some completely
>remote, snowball's chance in hell they are pretending to be dead,
>they'll escape and dig their way down deeper into the earth, into the
>recesses of hell.
>
>Jenn

I LOVE IT!!!!!!  Too bad the writers won't get a clue and actually
proceed as above.  *sigh*  Jenn, you really should write for GH!

-Sucheta
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: slowther@ducvax.auburn.edu (Sam Lowther)
Subject: ATWT: Phonemate Redux
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords:  Number, pleeeuzzz...
Organization: Auburn University
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 13:18:00 GMT

Some more answering machine quickies:

DanaVitro:  "I can't come to the phone now, I'm going to, uh, meet Bill, uh, at
  the Cellar.  Yes, that's it.  Oh, but I'm stopping by the mall on the way
  there, yes, so I'll be a little late.  I'll probably not buy anything, but
  that's where I'll be.  Honest..."

Tease:  "..."

DrJohn:  "I'm not in right now...I've gone to a wedding.  It might be mine.
  I'm not sure...I've lost track..."

JSlut:  "Can't talk to you now...I'm ovulating..."

Kirkadoodle:  "I'm not home...I'm spending quality time with my kids, uh, uh...
  Linda Ann, yes, and, oh, the other one, you know, the boy, whatshisname.
  There aren't any others, are there..."

Simondian:  "I'd love to come to the phone, but they only let me appear about
  once every three weeks.  Every time it looks like my story's going to come
  off the back burner, I disappear for a month..."

CourtMe:  "Can't talk right now...I just had a snack..."

--Sam

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sam Lowther       |INTERNET:slowther@ducvax.auburn.edu |"I'm not a doctor, but  
Auburn University |BITNET:  slowther@auducvax          | I play one on r.a.t.s."
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: dias@cac.washington.edu (Vivian Dias )
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB: a bit more
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:09:27 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Nov10.190927.5979
Organization: UW Computing

In article <3996@randvax.rand.org>, pboren@rand.org (Pat Boren) writes:
> >on today's show, although the McCabe/Winston fans might appreciate Charles
> >Grant's response to the question:
> >
> >"Someone in life you couldn't do without?"
> >
> >His answer:
> >
> >"Your pet".
> >
> >Mike
> 
> Awww, good answer, good answer.  Can you stand it, Vivian?  He's
> too good to be true.
> 

> 
> Pat
> -- 

  I loved it.  I was also happy, happy, happy to see he and Winston again
  yesterday.  In my what we all know to be my unhumble opinion they need to
  use Winston and Dreyfuss a lot more than they do :)

  Does anyone else get the impression that stories are being drug out?  It's
  like they're waiting to find out if they get picked up by someone else
  before they commit to expanding the storyline or just dropping it.  It's
  frustrating.

  Sooooo, what about the Mason/Julia confrontation yesterday?  I got the
  distinct impression that Mason wasn't even aware of how shallow his bid
  for the judgeship was.  According to Julia the trappings of the office
  were his sole motivation.  I would like to think that Mason was a bit
  more complex than that.  And why does Julia seem to feel that she will
  be a better judge?  Is she insinuating that Mason will not be as fair?
  I love the Julia character but she's been a bit sanctimonious lately.
  Lighten up Julia,  not all men nor for that matter all Republicans :>)
  are bad people.

  -Vivian
  
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: cantor@iguana.cis.ohio-state.edu (scott eric cantor)
Subject: Re: GH: Tony Geary back as Bill
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 02:02:22 GMT

In article <7NOV199210033255@mrl.arc.nasa.gov> holst@mrl.arc.nasa.gov (Laura Holst) writes:
>In article <1df3acINNk9r@gap.caltech.edu>, cher@wendy.ipac.caltech.edu (Cheryl
>LaGue) writes...
>>I am almost afraid to jump into this fray, but after reading all this
>
>Do NOT be afraid ;)

Be afraid.  Be very afraid.	[Sorry, couldn't resist :-)]

>
>Don't any of you remember Luke and Laura?
>
>Talk about chemistry.

True enough.  If you want to start going back that far, we can just stop
watching altogether.  Nothing's happening now that could rival the minor
storylines back then.

>
>I *CAN'T STAND THE WRITERS* for bringing back Tony Geary as other than
>Luke.  I don't think anyone has commented about this, but, I CAN'T
>STAND THIS!  Why did they have to bring Tony Geary back as someone
>else??? Like we're all just supposed to forget...... and believe.....
>Bill is Luke's twin brother???  He looks like Luke (looks like butter,
>but it's not - it's Chiffon!) Do you guys remember when he first came
>on the show? (again) When Bobbie saw him in the hospital room??
>

	Sadly, I must defend (gasp!) the writers on this one up to a point.
It wasn't their idea to bring him back as a different guy.  That was his
stipulation for returning.  I too would have preferred Luke, but for me,
better Tony as Bill than no Tony at all.

	Turning writer-defend mode off, the problem for me is the way they've
taken the character since Gloria left again.  They were saddled with this
Eckert clan nobody wanted, and they couldn't get rid of them, because their
big star was one of them.  So they've been totally clueless about what to do
with Bill since then.  His character has no consistency, and it's gotten to
the point of stupidity.  He's clearly happier playing Bill as a villain,
but they won't let him do that, at least not completely.

	Nevertheless, I still hold out the hope that he'll get the chance to
do something before he gets fed up and leaves again.  Emma Samms will be
leaving soon, after having been wasted for a year, and with that badly
conceived pairing out of the way, the character might become the villain
Tony apparently wants him to be.

	It would be great to see Luke and Laura again, although that may be
the classic "you can't relive the past syndrome" rearing its ugly head, but
I always keep myself from wishing for things that aren't going to happen.
I don't see Genie coming back, anymore than I see Tristan coming back,
so the writers better come up with something.


>--- Laura Holst
>    holst@merlin.arc.nasa.gov


[ Scott Cantor			     UNIX is a small, fast, efficient     ]
[ Ohio State University		     operating system upon which every    ]
[ Columbus, Ohio		     graduate student in the universe has ]
[ 				     played pin the tail on the donkey.   ]
[ cantor@cis.ohio-state.edu		          ---- a UNIX guru        ]
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
From: lindamo@ism.isc.com (Linda M.)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: Couples -- YOU Decide!
Date: 10 Nov 92 01:23:49 GMT
Organization: SunSoft Inc., Los Angeles, Ca.
NNTP-Posting-Host: sparkle

In article <1992Nov9.092157.2293@utkux1.utk.edu> mroberts@UTKUX1.UTK.EDU (Mary K.) writes:
>What man, if any, would you like to see paired with the following women?
>(And "why?")
>
>1.  Angelique - Albeit I like Jack, he's so staid lately and Angelique
		 is already so hesitant and mild-mannered that I am 
		 afraid that these two matched up would be sleep-inducing,
		 but...  Actually, Edmund - when he's not being weird
		 is so spontaneous that he may be able to jostle her out of
		 her lethargy, ... hmmmmm...
>
>2.  Brooke -  O.K., Edmund for her.  I see months of working out his problems,
		and Brooke is very good at that... with a happy ending for 
		once, please...
>
>3.  Dixie - Her character is so inane that she adds new dimension to the
	     term "ditsie."   I wouldn't wish her on anybody - even Brian.
>
>4.  An-Li - I think her and Terrance are cute.  Give them more of a part,
	    or, if like someone said, they are doing away with An-Li's
	    part, then Terrence and Taylor would be hysterical!
>
>5.  Erica - I have to agree with someone else who responded that 
	    that when her and Adam get together the sparks just fly.  They
	    get my vote.  She and Jack have great chemistry, but as soon
	    as they get together, Jack becomes blinded by love (or something)
	    and he doesn't see through her, which becomes dull very fast.
>
>6.  Hayley - someone new, more mature than Brian.  Charlie and her have
	    a sort of nice rapport, but he just seems too old for her.  I
	    think he fits in more as a confidante for Hayley.
>
>7.  Livia - don't know what to do with her, 'cause her and Tom are very
	   boring.
>
>8.  Taylor -  someone who sees through her and doesn't put up with
	   her crap.  I really like her character, but to eye Derek with
	   any sort of longing is difficult to believe.
>
>9.  Natalie - she drives me nuts...  I liked Natalie's character when she
	    was not so disgustingly nice.  I don't care who she's with
	    cause all of her scenes get the ol' FF.  The new actress is doing
	    alright, but her storyline is dull...
>
>10  Galen - by herself.  Let her be strong and independent for  a while.

>
>11  Myrtle - I think she should be matched up with someone.  She's a hoot.
	   But then I'm always trying to match up Jessica from Murder She
	   Wrote and Ben Matlock from Matlock, too, so.
>
>12  Phoebe - Bring back Langley...
>
>13  Ruth - Joe, of course.
>
>14  Gloria - I think her and Tad would set the screen on fire.  I love
	  Stuart, but he's just too nice.  They make great friends, but 
	  not anything else.  And I just can't imagine Adam backstabbing
	  Stuart and taking Gloria away from him... The thought makes me
	  feel ill.
>
>15  Mimi - I think her and Lucas would be great.
>
>16  Helga - where is Vincent Price when you need him?
>
>

Well, that was terribly verbose for me.  Thanks for breaking the monotony
of the day...

Linda M.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv