HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: eparish@reed.edu (Elizabeth Cameron Parish)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: The War Between Us (Long)
Keywords: Just a harmless little old survey...
Date: 30 Jul 92 22:25:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Jul30.222514.20964
Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon


	(hameless plea for hugs:  somebody congratulate me!  I just 
	fshed my marine bio final!)
	
In article <1992Jul30.180654.21179@menudo.uh.edu> cullen@tree.egr.uh.edu (Caleb Cullen) writes:
>That intrigues me.  (My experience is limited by the number of other bi's  
>I know.  I need more experience so I won't seem so naive (I wonder why  
>that is :>))

	(On the other hand, maybe if you look _really_ naive you will
induce a flood of deflowers-of-innocents....ye gods, they're already
lining up to deflower you, aren't they?  *grin*  )

>It also leads me to beg the survey: How many of you who consider yourself  
>bisexuals would say you're 4 or higher on the Kinsey scale, and howmany  
>would claim to be 3 or lower?  Some say 1&2's are het's, 4&5's (&>) are  
>homosexuals, and what but 3 is left over for bi's?  I know I'm not a 3.

	I always thought that the Kinsey scale went from 0 to 6, but
I might be wrong.  Anyway,I fluctuate from 1 (or, if it goes from 1 to 6, 2)
to 5.5; I've been somewhere under 3 lately, but my Kinsey rating is
rising.  (I base it on the gender of people who turn my head.)  Just a
free-wheeling bi-cyclist, that's me.  If you do a weighted average of
the last couple of years, I think I wind up as about a 2.7.

	But, you know, I wouldn't call 1-2 Kinsey people het, esp. not in this
homophobic world.  Even when my Kinsey rating hits bottom, I still feel 
pretty darn bi; and I know a couple of low-Kinsey-number people who
identify as bi or as 'non-heterosexual, non-gay, sorta-bi, but mostly just
none-of-the-above'. 

	And anyway, why decide what you're going to call yourself based on
how other people think the Kinsey scale maps to group affiliation?  Anybody
who wants to call himself/herself bi IS bi, as far as I'm concerned, but
I know other people feel differently.  *sigh*


Cam Parish
n8946410@henson.cc.wwu.edu
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov ( Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: 'women's' vs 'lesbian'
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center and Reptile Farm
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:22:55 GMT

In article <1992Jul30.002124.7787@vpnet.chi.il.us> orc@vpnet.chi.il.us (david parsons) writes:
>
>   During my last trainspotting trip (*) I found myself in one of those
>(a threesome, that is) and can distinctly recall stumbling around almost
>dead from lack of sleep and sore muscles and bits for the day and a half
>after the, er, event.  I get the distinct feeling that most people who
>are keen on threesomes have a barely hidden deathwish, or are looking
>for a distracting exercise regime (**).

I've generally found in threesomes with two people of one sex and one person
of another, that the two of the same sex seem to get wrapped up with one
another to the exclusion of the third partner.  Probably this has more to do
with being and hanging around with bisexuals who primarily have sex with
motos, and consider motss to be something of a special treat.

Of course, after the last one I was walking with a limp for three days....
--scott
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale)
Subject: Re: Where did Ciaran Go? (was: the Party)
Organization: DSG, Dept. of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 14:04:41 GMT

In <1992Jul23.040942.1@woods.ulowell.edu> quinnb@woods.ulowell.edu writes:

>Clive Grace writes:
>> [...]
>> (I love this... how to wind-up 28,996 users, especially Brendan!) <Snigger>
>
>Waah!!!! Puleeessse tell me? I promise I'll be good... <pout>

No, Brendan. Besides, it's for your own good that people are being so
evasive when asked for more details about the party. If we went into
detail about everything that went on, that would just send you into
a severe depression knowing just what a wonderful time you missed.

Yes, it's definitely for your own good that we not say too much...


Ciaran.
-- 
Ciaran McHale                                                             ----
Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.       \bi/
Telephone: +353-1-7021539 FAX: +353-1-772204 email: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie \/
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde)
Subject: Re: Marraige and Apartheid
Followup-To: soc.bi
Originator: lunde@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
Reply-To: Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde)
Organization: Ministry of Silly Walks
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 06:36:32 GMT

In article <MUFFY.92Jul30164332@remarque.berkeley.edu> muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) writes:
>In article <1992Jul30.223959.21609@reed.edu> eparish@reed.edu (Elizabeth Cameron Parish) writes:
>> In article <MUFFY.92Jul30142420@remarque.berkeley.edu> muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) writes:
>
>> >Who is it that you think is going to "care" in the sense of doing
>> >something to make things less unjust?  Only us, and we already *know*.
>
>> Jumping into this discussion late, and with a newsreader that has
>> suddenly gone berserk, I'm wondering.... does it really matter whether
>> it makes a difference or not, in making a decision not to marry?  If I choose
>> to not do something that I think is unjust, it's because I don't want to
>> do it, not because I think I'm going to change the world.
>
>Well, the idea seems to be that if lots and lots of people refuse to get
>married because not every group *can* get married, then society will
>"take notice" and change marriage.  So, it seems like some people *do*
>want to use this as a way to "change the world."  I was just saying that
>I don't think it *will* change the world; I don't think other people
>will even care, much less *do* anything about it.  Therefore, it may be
>personally satisfactory to someone, for reasons of their own, to choose
>not to marry, but it doesn't seem useful as an instrument for change in
>the world.

I'm a member of a church congregation which has performed covenant
cerimonies for several same-sex couples. While this has no legal
standing, it strikes me that their example is doing a lot more to
change people's views about marriage than the example of mixed-sex
couples who do not marry legally.  (See the recent news about
a paper listing a lesbian couple in their announcements.)

I think people can subvert the instituion of marriage by using
it in unconventional ways as well as rejecting it entirely.

This is why the right wing tries so hard to narrow the notion of "family".

<> "Queer is a Family Value"

-- 
 Albert Lunde         | Interfaith  |     *Y*Y*      "A branch on the
 Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu |  Bisexual   |      *Y*        tree of life"
 alunde@nuacvm.bitnet |  Feminist   |.......|.........................
From: francois@usenet.umr.edu (Why ya askin?)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Check.in
Date: 29 Jul 92 03:16:08 GMT



--
\></<>\></<>\></<>\></<>\></<>\></<>\></<>\></<>\></<>\></<>\></<>\></
/<>\BLAK**TO**BASICS*********    \></ We Must Educate Our Own.    /<>\
\></ francois otherwise..        /<>\For Tomorrow Belongs To Those\></
/<>\></<>\></<>\></<>\></<>\></,>\></Who Prepare For It Today...../<>\
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Swamp Thing)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Ireland Party (was Re: Muffin Alert!)
Date: 27 Jul 92 13:07:01 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

jclark@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (John Clark) writes:

>Escondido? An odd place to begin a California West Coast tour. But
>then since Frank Zappa spent some of his formative youth in El
>Cajon (a little south but on a same par), Escondido could be OK.

Did I say I was doing a tour?  Assume nothing.  And I can assure you
that I do not consider anything Frank Zappa has done to be a
recommendation.

Sara
-- 
 >{8-)     Sara Hopkins     (-8}<              _____^__
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St. \ OOO/ / The Thing
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662 \++/ /   From
 >{8-) sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk (-8}<                \/\/ The Swamp
From: jclark@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (John Clark)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Edin<mumble> etc. (was Invisibility)
Date: 21 Jul 92 07:23:16 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <5421@m1.cs.man.ac.uk> dente@els.man.ac.uk (Colin Dente) writes:
+Mmmm... that *was* a nice silk shirt, (and a nice cutie :-)).  When I saw
+Angela on Waverley station on Sunday it was all I could do to stop myself from
+leaping on her.

Holy Cow, Waverley, I've been there. Unfortunately about month early
relative to the EdinBirgh Thang.
-- 

John Clark
jclark@ucsd.edu
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Swamp Thing)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Edinburgh Party Photos
Date: 26 Jul 92 22:18:41 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

hopkins@turing.ac.uk (Don Hopkins) writes:

>sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Swamp Thing) writes:

>   Sara - who has just done a practice run for her talk and it was *crap*

>Relax!  (Need I say how!)  My last talk I gave in a Bongo t-shirt:

>"Bongo, we have bad news for you. 
> Your ear has been delcared obscene by
> the National Endowment for the Arts."

I would like to thank the good Dr Hopkins for his good advice.  However
it was completely useless so I won't.

Sara

PS  I could wear the teddy bears tho ...
-- 
 >{8-)     Sara Hopkins     (-8}<              _____^__
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St. \ OOO/ / The Thing
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662 \++/ /   From
 >{8-) sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk (-8}<                \/\/ The Swamp
Newsgroups: soc.bi,soc.motss
From: jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com (Jake Coughlin)
Subject: Re: Screaming Yellow (Re: The War Between Us (Long))
Originator: jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 13:17:42 GMT
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research

ry@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (ryerson.schwark):
> Oke, bute can i fukk u? I premise knot too uze ani consananats.

now i know why i like literacy programs so much! :-)

-- 
Jason Coughlin ( jakec@ralvmm.vnet.ibm.com )
Queer Without A Cause!
"I find myself suddenly in the world, and I recognize that I have one
right alone: that of demanding human behavior of the other." -- Fanon
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale)
Subject: Re: 'women's' vs 'lesbian'
Organization: DSG, Dept. of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 11:26:54 GMT

In <Bs7sE7.7xt@news.larc.nasa.gov>
kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov ( Scott Dorsey) writes:

[talking about threesomes]
>Of course, after the last one I was walking with a limp for three days....

A limp what?


<> When someone asks you what your favourite position is, tell them
<> 'diagonal'...
<> --- Ian Silver (silveri@qucdn.queensu.ca)

Ciaran.
-- 
Ciaran McHale                                                             ----
Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.       \bi/
Telephone: +353-1-7021539 FAX: +353-1-772204 email: cjmchale@dsg.cs.tcd.ie \/
From: kdc5072@cs.rit.edu (Kevin D Colagio)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: The Welcome Wagon is off and running.....
Date: 26 Jul 92 17:29:28 GMT
Followup-To: soc.bi
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY

Sorry that I haven't responded to the (undoubtedly) high magnitude of
de-muffiners lately, but I have had a few personal problems that I am
sorting through (see my next post...)

But to all those who have demuffined of late, As the official (I think it
is still official) driver of the Soc.bi Welcome Wagon, the following was
written for all of you....



There you are, sitting at your terminal reading some post from this guy
whose address is kdc5072@cs.rit.edu, when all of a sudden, you realize that
the feet that are connected to your legs are no longer touching the floor!

*bang*

your knees just hit the bottom of the desk that you are sitting at...

!thump!

the chair just fell over backwards from you moving it back on you way up!
You slowly glide to the nearest window, but you realize that there is no
window there, rather there is a LARGE hole, and on the floor are shards of
glass.  "Now when did that happen?" you wonder, but before you can think of
an answer, you are outside.

You look up (because that is the direction that you are heading again) add
see the STRANGEST thing imaginable....Consider, a old covered wagon (as
used in the old west of the United States [you know, like in the movie
Blazing Saddles...]) that has had a few modifications done to it...well,
maybe not a FEW, but.....

The bottom has been expanded, but you can still see the top (this is how
you know it is a covered wagon...)  There is a trap door in the bottom,
that is slowly opening.  You see about 30 or 40 people gathered around the
door, just waiting to {grab} you when you get to the door. <grin>

As you enter, any multitude of people offer to show you around, while any
other multitude offer you a place in the local party town....

Meanwhile, the Driver (that's me!) heads back to the steering wheel to
track down the next person....

enjoy!

*hug*
kiss
snuggle
nibble
wink
lick
etc..
etc...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|                                                                |
|   Kevin Colagio         I happen to like    My other computer  |
|        aka              me the way I am!   is a Commodore 64C. |
| kdc5072@cs.rit.edu            huh?            yeah,  right!    |
|                                                                |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: eparish@reed.edu (Elizabeth Cameron Parish)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Marraige and Apartheid
Date: 30 Jul 92 22:39:59 GMT
Article-I.D.: reed.1992Jul30.223959.21609
Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon

In article <MUFFY.92Jul30142420@remarque.berkeley.edu> muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) writes:

>Who is it that you think is going to "care" in the sense of doing
>something to make things less unjust?  Only us, and we already *know*.

	Jumping into this discussion late, and with a newsreader that has
suddenly gone berserk, I'm wondering.... does it really matter whether
it makes a difference or not, in making a decision not to marry?  If I choose
to not do something that I think is unjust, it's because I don't want to
do it, not because I think I'm going to change the world.       Over the
past year or so, I've started thinking that getting married is not a 
thing I want to do, partly because of my notions of what's right and partly
for personal reasons.(Fortunately, my MOTOS sweetie is not a big marriage
fan either.)
 
Nobody really cares, except perhaps his crazed-Republican parents, and the 
walls of homophobia/patriarchy/couple-ism have not come crumbling down.
So what?  I don't think it negates my reasons for not getting married.

>By the way, I haven't read this whole thread...I *do* hope that the
>people who are protesting the injustice of motos-couple-only marriage
>are protesting the injustice of couple-only marriage as well...

I think I saw a few folks protesting that, too, but I wouldn't want to
misattribute anything.

Cam Parish, another bisexual staunchly opposed to family values
n8946410@henson.cc.wwu.edu
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: tweaver@nyx.cs.du.edu (T.C.Weaver)
Subject: Re: Drummers
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Distribution: soc.bi
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 19:01:54 GMT

 sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Swamp Thing) writes:
+ken@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Ken Johnson) writes:
+> What you really want is a PIANIST.

Dear, dear. It's those people telling us what we want again, dear.
+Fenthe Marten replies:

+> Well, much as I hate (hah!) to blow my own trumpet, so to speak, jugglers 
+>tend to develop a certain degree of dexterity.. <grin>
>
>How about a juggling pianist?

You've only got one & it looks awf'ly heavy.

Tanaqui
From: johnf@uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu (John Flanagan)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: John's sex life
Date: 29 Jul 92 19:37:32 GMT
Organization: University of Hawaii, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy

In article <nsn86a4@fido.asd.sgi.com> kenj@kambo.corp.sgi.com (Ken ``Blackfur'' Jones) writes:
>elee74l@Rosie.UH.EDU writes:
>
>>John Flanagan writes:
>>>At my last HIV test a few months ago, the counsellor asked me
>>>how many men I had slept with in the preceeding 6 months.  Trying to
>>>be conscientious, I thought real hard and recounted a couple of times
>>>before settling on a number.  It turned out that I did not need to be
 >>>so careful -- he simply checked off "more than 10."  The question
>>>about how many women I'd slept with was easy:  1.
>>>
>>>I also know others (hi, Ken, I know you're reading this).
>
>>Tsk, tsk, tsk.....
>>Yes, I just read this.  Just got back to U.S. last night.
>
>>Now, what gave me away that I am primarily homosocial, huh?  8-)
>
>>Oh.... was there another Ken that you were refering?  If that's the case,
>>then *oops* excuse me.
>
>Hm...  And here I thought John was referring to _me._

Ah, the One True Ken pipes up at last.

>*pout*  So how
>many Ken's have there been, John?

Now, now, don't pout -- you'll get premature crow's feet.  Of course
you're the only one (the only Ken, that is).

>And "more than 10" men in the past 6 months?  Ooh.  I can think of 6
>offhand.  Sounds as though life has been good to you since you've
>moved to Hawaii.

Not nearly as good as San Francisco was.  Things have been rather
quiet lately, in fact.  But I have a blind date this Saturday...
Time for a decent haircut;  I'm trying to let it grow out, but it's in
those horrible middle stages right now.  Maybe that's why my
social life has been so flaccid lately.

>BTW, it feels odd to banter on the newsgroup instead of the BISEXU-L
>list.  Sorta like going on vacation and bumping into a good friend
>from your home town.  soc.bi isn't my usual venue; it's easier to
>skip articles here when I'm running short on time (like I have for
>the past few weeks).  Whereas BISEXU-L, being a mailing list, is far
>more intrusive and less easy to ignore.

Will soc.bi be harder to ignore if I start talking about you here?
I usually skip over soc.bi, too, but there have been a few interesting
conversations here lately.  I think I'll check it out for a while.
Funny how little overlap there is between the list and the
newsgroup. 

>- Ken

--John
-- 
John Flanagan                          ||
johnf@uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu           ||"Don't worry, honey, 
U. of Hawaii, Dept. of Physics & Astro.|| our skirts are clean."
2505 Correa Rd., Honolulu, HI 96822    ||
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Swamp Thing)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: making waves (at work)
Keywords: BGLAD (Silentium = Mors)
Date: 21 Jul 92 12:36:32 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

kts@philabs.philips.com (Kimberley T. Smith) writes:

>Hi folks, I need your support.

>I decided to make waves today... at work!  I'm a little nervous, but I'm
>feeling good in general...

>I wore my BGLAD T-shirt to work (along with my ratty pair of loved jeans
>complete with home sewn side-panels and owl patches on one knee).  Afterall,
>it's a Friday -- good day to wear my Wesleyan garb.

Hi Kimberley,

I shan't go into lots of detail as Bill and Keith and Coe have already
said all that needs saying, but you have my support as well.  It took me
a long time to get up the courage to wear pink triangles and bi tshirts
to work so I know it's difficult.  And although folk seem quite straight
in this department it's a very easy-going atmosphere so it's no big deal
around here really.  So good for you Kim, hang on in there and I hope
your SO doesn't take too long to rally to your support.

Sara
-- 
 >{8-)     Sara Hopkins     (-8}<              _____^__
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St. \ OOO/ / The Thing
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662 \++/ /   From
 >{8-) sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk (-8}<                \/\/ The Swamp
Xref: sparky soc.bi:9861 soc.motss:33074
Organization: University of Maine System
Date: Wednesday, 29 Jul 1992 23:57:50 EDT
From: Ailsa N.T. Murphy <IO81409@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Newsgroups: soc.bi,soc.motss
Subject: Re: When you Meet a Lesbian: Hints for Heterosexual Women

good list, especially #13.  i realy dislike being flirted with by
wimmin who are at the same time bending over backwards to tell
me they are straight...
                                         -ailsa

p.s. not that this happens often, mind you, but it has happened...
From: sj1s+@andrew.cmu.edu (Sherrianne M. Johnson)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: 'women's' vs 'lesbian'
Date: 27 Jul 92 17:08:51 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.seR9sXm00WBKA6RmlG
	<1992Jul25.173949.1279@amhux2.amherst.edu>
Organization: Sophomore, Art, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

Key:
>>Me
>Tim Pierce


>>I also empathize with this feeling of rejection from the "women's camp".
>> However, I have had a hard time placing, exactly, which camp the
>>rejections come from.  I have been criticized by a gay male for having
>>an inflammatory .sig ("Being bi means having the possibility of loving
>>anyone"--Me), since I was obviously flaunting bisexual superiority.  Not
>>my intent, but the hostility was there.
> 
>If you're talking about David Woolwine on the GayNet mailing list, the
>egg's on your face.  He's bi.  :-)

*sheepishly wiping egg off face*  Ah.  I apologize.  I seemed to
remember him saying, "As a gay male, I think *blah blah*", but I guess I
was wrong...

 
>>I have been rejected by some
>>lesbians I know as almost not real...like bisexuals were not real
>>creatures at all, but just some fragmented confused creatures.  (Ha!) 
>>Obviously I have been rejected by heterosexuals, although straights seem
>>to be pretty accepting of female bi's, anyway...
> 
>Do you really think so?  Having seen how straight men deal with female
>bisexuality and lesbianism, I imagine that were I a bi woman, their
>actions would drive me further and further from relationships with
>men.  It seems to me that heterosexual men consider bi women even more
>sexually targettable than they do heterosexual women.

I had meant that rather sarcastically, actually.  In accepting, I meant
that some people ARE accepting, while the others regard me as the
typical (to them) wanna-have-sex-with-everything bi female.  *sigh* 
I've been fending off idiots like that on IRC for a while now...
However, the male friends I have (and my MOTOS love) have not pushed me
away from relationships with men, thankfully.  I enjoy and respect them
very much.  

And I began, slowly, to learn not to listen to everyone who speaks to me
in criticism this year during art critiques.  I'm still trying not to
get offended by every put-down that comes my way (because maybe the
people aren't worth listening to).  But it is an uphill battle.

Thank you for pointing out my error, though.  I'll have to think about
it a bit more now.



> 
>-- 
>____ Tim Pierce                / "You mean there are TWO of you, Pierce?
>\  / twpierce@amherst.edu      /  God help us all."
> \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /   -- Major Charles Emerson Winchester III
 

\begindata{text,17025944}
\textdsversion{12}
\template{default}
\typewriter{sher

sj1s@andrew.cmu.edu

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

"Being bi means that     |

you have the possibility | B0 f-- w c+ g k+ s+ p

of loving anyone."  --me | 

}\enddata{text,17025944}
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: dgo@athens.uucp (26265-nachem)
Subject: Re: Breeders and other epithets
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 20:28:54 GMT


Hi.
I used to have a "friend" who ran Bisexu-L, but I have no idea how to access the list
from my location (it's  not in my .newsrc)
Any advice on how to do this would be appreciated

Dave