From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
Subject: Re: Gay Pride .sig of Steve Chaney
Summary: Just another Chaney flame
Keywords: POC
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 18:38:57 GMT

Keywords: 

In article <1992Oct15.041216.8433@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
#In article <7155@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
##That's okay, Pete.  Dennis gave up on this one.  Oddly enough,
##Dennis has given up on most of his claims lately.  He made
##a fool of himself by requesting evidence that he'd misread
##attribution lines (he dropped that thread when the evidence
##was posted), he made the utterly laughable statement that
##Jesse Jackson called "the Jews of New York" "Hymietown"
##(he dropped that thread), he recently claimed that most
##Americans support rape and incest (!), and, among his
##other inanities, he's claimed that Rush Limbaugh's book
##has outsold the Bible.  I doubt that he'll reply on the
##last two threads, either.  
#
#Okay, let's refute your claims here, Bogus: 
#FACT #1: Which attribution lines, Bogus?  

Nice refutation, Dennis.  (Free clue - "Facts" are not generally
expressed as questions.)

I guess that it's hard for you to remember all of the ridiculous
challenges that you post.  

You got mad at Mr. Woodyatt for posting that you'd confused
yourself with Larry Margolis.  Here's the relevant article:

In article <1992Sep29.155656.17489@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
In article <1992Sep23.160756.8470@wdl.loral.com> bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com (Cranius Sphinctus) writes:

##I'm speechless, actually.  I'm stuck in 7:00-A.M.-no-stimulants-
##in-the-bloodstream hamster wheel over this statement:
##
##Message-ID: <1992Sep23.014327.29219@csus.edu>
#### Oh, I love it when my liberal approach makes me look pro-choice.
##
##He wrote that in a followup to a post by barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet which}i
##presumed that *Larry Margolis* was pro-choice.  I was left with the
##impression that Mr. Chaney was confused about his identity and thought
##he was Larry Margolis for a moment.
#
#No, you stupid shit - it was a response to ME. It was my attribution
#directly before his words.
#
#You've got some major stepping to do, Cranius Sphinctus, to make this lie
#of yours stick. For instance, re-posting that article to show evidence.

Of course, you were wrong, as usual.  Here's the article with your
attribution lines.  Larry made the comment that "barnejd" was
replying to.

In article <1992Sep23.014327.29219@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
#In article <1992Sep22.123959.2529@wkuvx1.bitnet> barnejd@wkuvx1.bitnet writes:
##In article <1992Sep22.052211.14940@watson.ibm.com>, Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com> writes:
####
####            For heaven's sake, Dan, it's only a TELEVISION SHOW...
#### 
### Going to war with a fictional character is certainly bizarre.
##
##Yes, but criticizing the unrealistic depiction of liberals as "good"
##and conservatives as "evil" is not.  Would you criticize a TV show for
##a strong pro-life message?  If you're pro-choice (I assume you are), I'd
##bet you would.  So back off - Danny was right in his criticisms of the
##show _and_ the character.
#
#Oh, I love it when my liberal approach makes me look pro-choice. 

So, Dennis, I guess you do have trouble keeping track just what
pseudonym you're using at any given time.

#FACT #2: Jesse Jackson said "WELCOME TO HYMIETOWN." He said it in
#	 Brooklyn, NY. FACT. I am right and you are wrong.

No, POC, you're wrong.  Rev. Jackson refered to the city
that way.  You said something completely different:

In article <1992Sep24.211644.29471@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu 
(Stephen A Chaney) writes: 

#Like when he called the Jews of New York "Hymietown" ? 

"The Jews of New York" and New York City are not synonymous.

#FACT #3: I have posted SEVERAL polls showing that Americans support
#	 legal abortions for rape & incest only. NOT "Americans 
#	 support rape & incest." FACT! You are wrong and I am right.

No, you're wrong.  You did say that Americans support rape and
incest.


In article <1992Oct5.181714.12006@csus.edu>, chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:

#I'll come back with poll stats showing that the majority of Americans
#do support rape & incest, and you'll bring the poll data showing that
#when asked about these issues, Americans support all of it. 

It was a stupid thing to say, wasn't it?

#FACT #4: Rush Limbaugh's book is the fastest selling NONFICTION 
#	 book in history according to Simon & Schuster & the NY Times.
#	 Where did I say anything about the BIBLE? FACT! I am right
#	 again and you are wrong. 

Oh, Dennis, you're changing your claim again.  You said:

In article <1992Oct8.004510.22586@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
#
#Rush Limbaugh is the MOST listened to on the radio 
#and the MOST read in the non-fiction books section... In history.

I did give you the benefit of the doubt here - I assumed that
you meant that Limbaugh's *book* was the "MOST read in the non-fiction 
books section... In history.," not Limbaugh himself.  

The Bible is classed as non-fiction in most book stores.
Your personal opinions about its veracity aren't relevant.

#If you have ANY PROOF of anything you have said in this entire
#article, please post it. 

You said please, so I did.

#If I miss it, someone please e-mail me the post where Bogus Garvin
#shows that her claims have any basis in fact. 

Oh, yes, someone, please do.

#Bogus Garvin has been wrong every single solitary time she has ever
#accused me of anything such as in this article. She can never, ever
#tell the truth (like Slick Willie, but what else is new?), as obvious
#in this article, she can never, ever provide proof (well she did try
#to prove she was a woman and intelligent, but we know that proof was
#about the same as Al Gore saying he never voted pro-life) of her
#accusations whatsoever. 

I left this paragraph (and the next) in because they were so
funny.  

#Why continue with this, Bogus? Why continue to lie when everyone on
#this newsgroup knows you are a bald-faced (perhaps bald-headed, too?
#Shades of S(k)in(h)ead O'Connor?) liar and articles like the one I am
#responding to now, are shining examples of your inability to tell the
#truth. 

I'll continue as long as you deny your own words, Dennis.  

Sutt/2

















Newsgroups: talk.abortion