From: GC.JAB@forsythe.stanford.edu (Tony Bechtold)
Subject: Re: Moron
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 06:18:30 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.014238.11411@math.ucla.edu>,
rfedkiw@redwood.math.ucla.edu (Ronald Fedkiw) writes:

>In Article 28194, Tony Bechtold rambles

>> ... blah blah blah...
>> All the rest can't cut it against the strong NFC defenses.  The
>> mighty Bills have proven this the last two years.
>                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>Funny how two years ago the Giants LOST to the Bills in the regular
>season. Even funnier is how the Giants played at home.
>If you weren't such a moron you would've known that the Bills
>were favored to win because of that and they lost because
>their offense chocked, they missed the game winning field goal.

So where do you get off calling me a moron?  Perhaps your lack
of ingenuity in responding back with some intelligent insight
regarding football lead you to this conclusion on me being a moron?
Look in the mirror buddy!  Its people like you who start major
flame wars on this net.  Why don't you go crawl back into your
closet if you don't have anything meaningful to say.

Yes, the Bills were favored to win.  And like you said, they
"choked" against a strong defense.  If they had been as dominating
as expected, it wouldn't have taken a last second field goal to win.
As I see it, NFC defense shut them down BIG TIME two years in a row.

>As for last year... the Bills were plagued by injuries and lost
>to a better team. But if the Bills were healthy things 'might'
>have been different.

Ohh #@&*ing WHAAAAAAA!!!!  There are fans of 27 other teams on this
net who can complain about injuries too. Injuries are all part of
the game.  The good teams who have depth in the roster can overcome
injuries.  I thought that the Bills had depth in their roster.

>They played a hard schedule because they were in the Super Bowl the
>year before, so they made it back but it was hard and took a lot
>out of the team.

Humm, how many more excuses can this guy come up with??  Tough
schedules?  Oh come on, the Bills play in the weakest division
in football. At least up until this season they did.
Tough schedules are a fact of life in San Francisco. It wouldn't be
any fun if it wasn't!   "Took a lot out of the team"  That truly is
a good one I must say :->

>As for the Redskins, the yhad a cake schedule because they were
>wimps the year before. I bet this year they get hammered.
>If San Fran does anything it's because of their easy schedule,
>they weren't even a playoff team last year.

Redskins had an easy schedule?  Just playing in the NFC East
constitutes a tough schedule IMO.
The 49ers probably have the toughest schedule again this year.
Lets see, on the road the play, Giants, Jets, Saints, Falcons,
Patriots, Phoenix, Rams, Vikings. At home, Saints, Falcons, Rams,
Bills, Eagles, Dolphins, Bucs, Lions.  Thats easy huh?  If you say
so!

>Ron Fedkiw (rfedkiw@redwood.math.ucla.edu)

>A plan is made by someone who is sitting and thinking ...
>while others are doing.

Why don't you sit and ingage brain before mouth. You might find
that you'll get a little further along in life by doing so.

So tell me Ron, did you like my smartass ways in answering your
post? I suppose that I probably down right pissed you the hell off
huh?  Good, because that was my intention!
Now we can sit here and converse as educated adults over a sport
that I am sure we both love. Or we can sit here like immature
adolecents and insult each other over the net. Do what you
like, but I am not going to waste my time with you if you can't post
anything containing intelligent football conversation.

                                                   Tony
                                                GO 49ERS!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro