HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lewis@aera8700.mitre.org (Keith Lewis)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: PACKERS - REDSKINS WILDCARD CHANCES
Date: 21 Dec 92 15:46:50 GMT
    <1992Dec21.073746.5031@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
Organization: The MITRE Corporation

In article <1992Dec21.073746.5031@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>, grej_cif@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Georg "necromantic" Greiveldinger) writes:
>I just read in clari.sports.football.pro....

Thanks for forwarding the info.

>The Redskins will win a two way tie with the Pack.

OK, I can see this.  Washington has a slightly better record against common
opponants.

>The Redskins will be odd man out in a three way tie with Pack and Philly.

I don't get it.

=THREE OR MORE CLUBS TIEBREAKING RULES

=1. Head-to-head sweep (applicable only if one club has defeated
=each of the otners, or if one club has lost to each of the others).

Not applicable.

=2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games within the conference.

All tied at 7-5.

=3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.

Not applicable -- The Giants were the only team that played all three.

=4. Best average net points in conf. games.

Philly would win here; Green Bay would be last.

=5. Best net points in all games.
=6. Strength of schedule.
=7. Best net touchdowns in all games.
=8. Coin toss.

Irrelevant -- Philly gets top slot and Green Bay and Washington go to a
two-way tiebreaker.  The outcome of the Eagles-Giants last game should not
affect it.

Where did I go wrong?  Or is it them?

Keith Lewis             klewis@mitre.org          "Mr. Cheap"
I don't dance to music; music dances to me.  Email me for my PGP key.
The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!)
Subject: Re: VIKINGS WIN!!! 6-3
Organization: Yale University
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 14:56:24 GMT

In article <1992Dec21.134001.27322@bmw.mayo.edu> bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson) writes:
>From: bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson)
>Subject: Re: VIKINGS WIN!!! 6-3
>Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 13:40:01 GMT
>
>In article <1992Dec20.210940.14098@PacBell.COM>, jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN) writes:
>->Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
>->From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
>->Subject: Re: VIKINGS WIN!!! 6-3
>->
>->In article <1h2mtfINN2lo@uwm.edu> caeser@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Robert Michael Trotter) writes:
>->>
>->>	Ugly or not, we are the NFC Central Champs! We have beaten a
>->>	winning team in Pittsburgh, and we are definately headed to the
>->>	playoffs. Awesome Sunday!
>->>
>->>	Mark
>->>	GO VIKINGS!
>->>
>->>	ps- Sorry Pack fans, you gave it a great effort, just a bit short.
>->>
>->
>->sorry, not to cause any flames, but if the Vikes cannot
>->score anymore than 6 points, their playoff advancement hopes are
>->rather dismal.
>->-- 
>-> ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
>->"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
>->everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller
>->
>
>SO WHAT!!  You only need 6 points if the other team only gets 3. :^)
>
>Awesome defense.
>

To take some of your own words "Ya know what you call a win by X points?  A 
WIN."  PERIOD. 

Sounds like the 49ers/Giants playoffs story.  So JPG, what do you call win 
by ONE POINT.  THE NFC CHAMPIONS (who went on to win the SB)! 

(couldnt resist, flame suit on!!!  :-) 
Adriene
From: carrato@acsu.buffalo.edu (Michael Carrato)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Thomas out?
Date: 29 Dec 92 10:03:29 GMT
Organization: UB

sas@baffin.aruba.UUCP (Steve Sciandra) writes:

>Thurman Thomas is out next week?  Any confirmations on this, this early!?!?

No, Thomas is banged up but he should go. Kelly is out. There are also
NUMEROUS other injuries which could go either way, notably Bennett
and Jackson. Bennett is essential next week because the Bills need
the big play on defense with Kelly hurt. And Jackson is a good heady
cornerback... you want your secondary 100% healthy against Moon.

Both Bennett and Jackson have hamstring pulls, which means they 
REALLY don't know if they'll go (unlike other injuries where the 
Bills are mum on injury status). I have a feeling one or both may
sit this one out... a muscle pull is tough to play through.

Beebe will go, although he'll probably spend a long time in the film
room trying to recover what was jarred loose from his head by that hit!

Personally, I am hoping for 150 mph winds at Rich! (Just give the ball
to Thurman and watch him run.. :-))

Mike C.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
Subject: Re: VIKINGS WIN!!! 6-3
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:16:04 GMT

In article <Adriene_Nazaretian.74.0@QM.cis.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!) writes:
>In article <1992Dec21.134001.27322@bmw.mayo.edu> bergerson@cvdv79.mayo.edu (Chad D. Bergerson) writes:
>>
>>SO WHAT!!  You only need 6 points if the other team only gets 3. :^)
>>
>>Awesome defense.
>>
>
>To take some of your own words "Ya know what you call a win by X points?  A 
>WIN."  PERIOD. 
>
>Sounds like the 49ers/Giants playoffs story.  So JPG, what do you call win 
>by ONE POINT.  THE NFC CHAMPIONS (who went on to win the SB)! 
>
>(couldnt resist, flame suit on!!!  :-) 
>Adriene
>
Hmmmm, Adriene. I'd prefer that you NOT have you flame suit on!! :-)
I would love to personally get you on fire, oops, I'll send you an
off-line on this one. :-) NOT! TEASE!!! :-)

Besides, I know better than to argue with a coy-female. And besides,
you're right. A win is a win! Too bad your Giants did not get
enough of those "a win by "X" points". " :-)

-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: deanb@cray.com (Dean Barker)
Subject: Re: playoff matchups
Date: 30 Dec 92 11:25:24 CST


That's what I get for doing a lot of research...I make mistakes.
Thanks to Kenneth Melcher for pointing it out to me. Philly did
indeed beat the Saints.

-Dean

deanb@cray.com (Dean Barker) writes:



>Washington at Minnesota

>        Overall: Minnesota 11-5, Washington 9-7
>        Head to Head: Washington 15-13 at Minnesota
>        Conference: Minnesota 8-4, Washington 7-5
>        Common Opponents: Washington 2-1, Minnesota 1-2
>        Home Field: Minnesota 5-3 at home, Washington 3-5 on road


>Philadelphia at New Orleans

>        Overall: New Orleans 12-4, Philadelphia 11-5
>        Head to Head: New Orleans 15-13 at Philadelphia
			NOT!!
			Philadelphia 15-13 at home
>        Conference: New Orleans 9-3, Philadelphia 8-4
>        Common Opponents: Philadelphia 3-2, New Orleans 2-2
>        Home Field: New Orleans 6-2 at home, Philadelphia 3-5 on road


>Kansas City at San Diego

>        Overall: San Diego 11-5, Kansas City 10-6
>        Head to Head: Kansas City 24-10 at San Diego & 16-14 at home
>        Division: Kansas City 6-2, San Diego 5-3
>        Conference: Kansas City 8-4, San Diego 9-5
>        Common Opponents: San Diego 5-3, Kansas City 4-4
>        Home Field: San Diego 6-2 at home, Kansas City 3-5 on road


>Houston at Buffalo

>        Overall: Buffalo 11-5, Houston 10-6
>        Head to Head: Houston 27-3 at home
>        Conference: Buffalo 7-5, Houston 7-5
>        Common Opponents: Buffalo 4-2, Houston 1-4
>        Home Field: Houston 5-3 at home, Buffalo 5-3 on road

>----------------------------------------------------------
>Dean Barker                             Cray Research, Inc.
>deanb@cray.com                          655F Lone Oak Drive
>(612) 683-5414                          Eagan, MN 55121
From: dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Playoffs/the final answer/the Cowboys.
Date: 28 Dec 92 20:22:48 GMT
Reply-To: dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA

In article <1hnjhpINNo9h@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds) writes:
> >>       in the NFL and rushing defensive that has not been test by the top
> >>       rusher in the league.  E.Smith will have a field day, so will Aikman and
> >
> >Actually, I happen to believe that Thomas and Sanders are both better than
> >Smith (but obviously this is very subjective).  Thomas caused the niners
> >fits early in the season.  We will find out about Sanders tonight.  BTW,
>
>You just lost ALL credibility with that one Sanders ??? Pleeease !

Maybe if Smith had to run behind an offensive line that only had
ONE starter playing in their position from last year his stats would
go down as well.  It was John Madden, not me, who said two weeks
ago that SANDERS was the best PURE running back (note: NOT the best
ALL AROUND back) in the NFL.  Smith had a great season, and is a
great running back.  He also has a fine young offensive line in front
of him.  (And I heard that Smith treated his linemen last year to fancy
watches and this year is giving each lineman a free plane ticket anywhere
in the world - classy action by a classy back!)  It is no slur to put him,
Thomas and Sanders in the same category.  As I said earlier, picking the
best running back is subjective.

>Thomas = maybe but Sanders ??? 
>
>And for the last time:
>Listen real close, pick up the paper and look at the sports page,
>now turn to the page NFL Statistics, now look under the column
>marked DEFENSE, now look at the team name right at the top...
>
>DALLAS #1 defense on the whole NFL, deal with it !!!!
>
>IT DOES NOT SAY NEW  RLEANS, 
>we already know theres no O there.

I thought net.etiquette was to not erase the other person's point/facts.
Perhaps I was wrong.  In any case, it is true that Dallas is rated #1
based on yardage.  Dallas is rated no better than 3rd based on points
allowed (New Orleans is 1st, Pittsburgh is 2nd AND the 49ers could be
3rd if they hold Detroit to under 13 points.  Gee the great Dallas
defense giving up more points than the defensively lousy 49ers?  Which
is more important to you, giving up points or giving up yards?  
Announcers love this #1 stuff (and, I guess, so do we NFL nuts).

Has Dallas played a top offense?  The 49ers?  NO.  The Bills?  NO.
The Oilers?  NO  The Dolphins?  NO.  New Orleans has played four
games against this crew.  Maybe Dallas will get a chance in the
playoffs to show how good they are defensively.
From: kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kist)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Miami Dolphin Theme Song
Keywords: miami,dolphins
Date: 21 Dec 92 23:24:19 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: UB

In article <1992Dec21.223457.12092@cs.tulane.edu> stassin@gumbo (Shannon C. Tassin (USDA) ) writes:
>I am a big dolphin fan and want to get a copy of the song played when Miami
>scores, etc... I can only hear part of it when the network usually returns
>from the commercial break.  Can anyone possibly tell me the name of the song,
>and where I can get it from?

No, but I can send you a copy of the Bills theme song if you want. (after
all, it's much better)

>
>Shannon C. Tassin
>stassin@gumbo.age.lsu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ric@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (ricardo.g.irvin)
Subject: Re: Over-rated players???
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 14:42:16 GMT

In article <1992Dec23.110451.1@vaxc> accdtg@vaxa.hofstra.edu writes:
>I just had a question and I figured this would be the best place to ask it. Who
>do you think is the most over-rated player in the NFL?
>My guess would be Deion Sanders of the Falcons, but what do you guys think?
>-- DTG
I disagree with you on this, I think Deion is as talented as any athlete
We have ever seen, I do not know how long it will last (2 sport) but
what he is doing (starter in 2 sport AT THE PRO level) is amazing!! not
to mention he sometimes play both ways in football (that in itself should
warrant phrase) I may not agree with his cocky attitude, but, name a good
defensive back who is'nt cocky. I say enjoy what he is doing now because
I dont think you're going to see another after he is done.

		Ric. Irvin

		PEACE.
From: shankar@sgi.com (Shankar Unni)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Low SAQ play by SF 49ers + Giants!
Date: 23 Dec 92 23:24:13 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: boris.wpd.sgi.com
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

Jim Jungbauer (jjungbau@luke.eecs.wsu.edu) wrote:

> but whoever called that play made a really stupid call.

Yup. Mike Shanahan, ex. of Broncos and Raiders fame.

An extremely talented coach, but he still shows flashes of
boneheadedness, which probably explains the success he had with the
Raiders.
--
Shankar Unni				E-Mail:	shankar@sgi.com
Silicon Graphics Inc.			Phone:	+1-415-390-2072
From: chill@cbnews.cb.att.com (daniel.a.miller)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: A sad farewell to Denver
Date: 28 Dec 92 16:11:07 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Dec27.214310.18825@nmsu.edu> dward@scf.nmsu.edu (Dan Ward) writes:
>    Denver just lost to the Chiefs by, I think - 42/20.  John
>    Elway and Co played a valiant game - but were finally over-
>    whelmed by a healthier (and younger) team.
>
>    I will miss Denver in the play offs.  I hope they make some
>    decisions during the off season and come back  next year ready to              play.  I think it will be good if Reeves is coach - he's done
>    a good job in my opinon.   I think it will be good if they 
>    try to replace some of the older players.  Guys like Mechlenberg
>    (Sp?) have played well, but it may be time to move on.  	                   I    think we need to ask John Elway to make the ultimate sacrifice -
>    to become a second string quarterback.
>
>    Wait a minute!. Don't flame me yet!  John Elway is the reason I
>    am a Denver fan.  I remember when he was drafted by the Colts - 
>    after telling them he wouldn't play for them.  They were offering
>    a LOT of money - but he signed with the Yankees to play baseball
>    for 50,000 rather than sell out his principals.  I decided the
>    guy must be worth admiring.  And, I think John Elway has truly
>    been an admirable sports character.   And yet,  age and time is
>    catching up to him.  I do not think he will ever really be 
>    healthy enough to play an entire season again.  But what a back
>    up threat he would be!   I don't know if he will ever make it
>    into the hall of fame - but I hope so.  I think he deserves it.
>
>    Oh well, now that Denver is out - I can give my complete support
>    to Dallas for the superbowl.    Goodby Denver.  See you again
>    next year.     Dan


	Sad Farewell??? I should say NOT!!! 

	I was GLAD to see Marty FINALLY whipe that STUPID smeark
	off of John Elway's face!!!! Even if he had to be coaching
	the Chiefs in order to do it!

	- Dan  
	  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett)
Subject: Re: Atlanta crushes Dallas !
Organization: Abode Computer Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 15:01:53 GMT

In article <douthit.724956361@scofflaw> douthit@convex.com (Ronnie Douthit) writes:
>The Falcons will crush Dallas and be featured on the cover of SI !


I guess this was not a brilliant prediction.

Cheers,

Eric

-- 

		Internet: eric@abode.ttank.com
		    uucp: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!wvus!abode!eric

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: punjabi@leland.Stanford.EDU (sanjeev punjabi)
Subject: Re: NEW VIKING QB?!
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 92 23:37:49 GMT

In article <wfEWWkC00WBO82UHQR@andrew.cmu.edu> to0b+@andrew.cmu.edu (Thomas Oligino) writes:
>> 
>>Do u think that the 9er front office would be foolish enough
>>to trade Joe to a tough NFC rival like the Vikings. In the
>>same breath, I do not know whether Joe is allowed to have
>>his choice or the 9er front office decides it for him as to
>>which team he will go to.
>
>I think Joe is a free agent after this year.


NOT!!  He has one year left on his contract with San Francisco.
Look for Joe to be traded to a team in need of a QB that is agreeable to
him and to the niners and for an acceptable offer.  Joe will provide a great
lift to any team that utilizes him well and will also help to sell tickets.
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Call against the Vikes
Date: 22 Dec 92 22:52:07 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <101891@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
>
|Hi
|
|During he 49ers/Vikes games as Terry Allen was rushing for a possible first 
|down, he was stopped short and a 9ers defensive lineman grabbed him by the
|legs and lifted him up.  Flags flew.  The foul was against ... Terry Allen??
|
|Did anyone else see this?  Did Allen do anything that warranted a foul??

Maybe it was just me but I thought I saw one of Allen's feet placed in
a rather personal area thus I thought the personal foul was warrented.  If
I recall the defensive lineman had his back to the camera and Allen was
on the sideline on his back.  You couldn't see what was happening in between
the players.

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
+==========================================================================+
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Reeves/Montana
Date: 29 Dec 1992 15:08:20 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

How about Dan packs up, moves to Seattle and takes Joe Montana with him
and trades a high draft pick for a bigtime receiver ?


      
          -----------------------------------------------------
          Anything you say will be digitized, edited, distorted, 
                     remixed and used against you...
          -----------------------------------------------------
From: sramesh@us.oracle.com (Life is virtual)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Joe Montana's future
Date: 31 Dec 92 23:10:36 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, California
Originator: sramesh@dvlseq.us.oracle.com
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
              at Oracle Corporation.  The opinions expressed are those
              of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.


	I have been following the discussions about Joe Montana's future
teams. Does anyone think he may end up in KC? I mean, they do need a QB and
if Joe plays like he used to, they may be legitimate super bowl contenders
next year. Any scoops in Kansas papers?

Kreig fans: No offense, but IMO, the Chiefs will be much better off with Joe.

-Ramesh-
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: root@june.cmp.rpi.edu (J.R. Ordon)
Subject: Re: My NFL Playoff Predictions
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 16:54:38 GMT

In article <92365.100955NMBCU@CUNYVM.BITNET> Nelson Broat <NMBCU@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:
>>e go...
>
>
Various explanation drivel deleted:
>
>>
>>And remember...you can trust ;) these picks!
>
Oh really????
>
>>
>>Beagles versus Da Aints
>>***********************
>>Aint that a hoot! ;-)
>>
>>Da S..Aints 23 - Beagles 17

I don't think so...  The Eagles are about as hot as you can get right now,
The saints haven't won a playoff game.. and won't this year..

Eagles 17 
Saints 10

>>
>>Vi-queens versus Washed up n' Skinned
>>*************************************
>>
>>My poor poor dear ole delusional father still thinks his bite sized purple
>>people eaters are going to go all the way...again! ...
>>
>>otherswise...next year Daddy...next year.

Wrong again... The skins should thank the vikes for allowing them to play one
more week. I agree with the vikes QB situation, but do you really think Rypien
is any better right now? the skins receiving core is hurt, and the vikes D will
score at least 7.

Vikings 23
Skins   10

>
>
>
>>HOUse of Lame versus Buffalo Chips
>>**********************************
>>
>>This one's easy! <== I'm saying this??? :)
>>
>>
>>HOUse of Lame 31 - Buffalo Chips 18  (yeah I know...its a weird score,
>                                      but that goes without saying, as this

Real hard to beat a team good as Buffalo 2 weeks in a row, even without Kelly.
This one's at COLD Rich Stadium. I think the Bills will win in a squeeker,
it'll be ugly but:

Buffalo 26
Houston 21

>>
>>
>>KC and The Sunshine Band versus Chris Berman's BOLTERGIEST
>>**********************************************************
>>of a chance. I know...bad pun...t :)
>>
>>KC and The Sunshine Band 28 - BOLTERGIST 5

Do you really think the Chiefs can score 28 in San diego??? Maybe, if the
defense scores all the points, the chiefs offense is real sad...
I think this one will be the best game of the weekend...

Chargers 20     In OVERTIME
Chiefs   17   

>>
>>                                                  The NELSON All Man
>>                                                        |
>>



On Monday, we'll see how we did....


--------------------------------------
J.R. Ordon

Only 12 weeks till spring!!!!


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chrisc@cae.wisc.edu (Chris Carey)
Subject: Re: The Packers still suck
Organization: College of Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin--Madison
Distribution: usa
Date: 21 Dec 92 23:15:54 CST

In article <1992Dec21.204229.12703@doug.cae.wisc.edu> chrisc@cae.wisc.edu (Chris Carey) writes:
>In article <1992Dec22.012332.1567@cs.uwp.edu> mcdonald@cs.uwp.edu (Joseph Mcdonald) writes:
>>Steve Keshen (steve@weber.com) wrote:
>>: Subject line says it all!
>>
>>And where the h-ll are you from STEVIE?  I bet it isn't Wisconsin.
>>Try another sports group...better yet, get back to work.
>>-- 
>>
>>*****************************************************************************
>>Joe McDonald				   			Go Badgers!!!
>>University of Wisconsin - Parkside	   		    Shot 'n a GOAL!!!
>Oh your at Parkside, I hadn't noticed that when I ripped on you at first, if I
>had I wouldn't have been so kind.  Well everybody who isn't from Wisconsin his
>being from Parkside explains it all.  Kind of like going to another four years
>of high school.
>
>-Chris C.
>
>
Hmm, after I posted this I thought it might be a little out of line.  I would
like to apologize to Steve for the statements included herein.  They were a
little too much, his statement notwithstanding.

Chris C.

Sorry 'bout that


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (The Purple Bleeder )
Subject: Re: Will there EVER be a dominant AFC team???
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 21:45:51 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

Boy, I liked one of the lines in Izzo's Post:

"Any team in the AFC can reach the Super-Bowl, butit's like a 
cow fighting for the first place in line to the slaughter house".

IMO, only SD can prove this wrong....maybe the chiefs.
S.H
------------------------------------------------------------------
My Euphoric Moments: A vike TD and a Twins homer blast
From: htilney@vax.clarku.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Steeler update
Date: 22 Dec 92 13:58:32 GMT
Organization: Clark University

Eric Green has officially completed his suspension and will be practicing
with the team this week. Chances are he will play on Sunday. Here's hoping
the big guy doesn't screw up again.

I'm not sure what O'Donnell's status is. I would think that he'd start
against the Browns if at all possible. Pittsburgh needs a big win.

If everyone's healthy I'm optimistic about the playoffs. There aren't
many teams in the league that would fare well without their starting QB and
primary receiving threat.

Bart
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro