HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jfrawley@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Judy Frawley)
Subject: Re: TV-movie transition (was Cheers Q)
Organization: Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 10:11:21 EST

In article <1992Nov5.165927.19600@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> jgacker@news.gsfc.nasa.gov (Paul Hubanks) writes:
>David Esan (de@moscom.com) wrote:
>: In article <1992Nov4.142827.777@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams) writes:
>: >No.  Bebe asked to leave so she could do more movies.  The producers 
>: >would never decide to dump such a great character as Lilith.  Bebe is
>: >already busy working on a movie...
>: 
>: Has this ever worked for anyone?
>
>	Meg Ryan went almost directly from soaps to movies.
>	Which is flat-out amazing.
>
>	Kevin Bacon is another example of soapdom-to-moviedom.
>
>	It may help to be not easily recognizable at first!  I.e. being
>a prime-time TV star could be a hindrance.
>
>	Jim Acker
>	jgacker@neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov

How about Kathleen Turner?  She went from "Nola" on "The Doctors" to
"Body Heat"....

(If memory serves; anyway she's another one to add to the list)

Judy
From: gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Law&Order vs LA Law
Date: 9 Nov 92 14:24:00 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1dhrh5INNrkm@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>, mathew@unixg.ubc.ca (Mathew B Englan
der) writes:
>firenza@wpi.WPI.EDU (Timothy Mark Collins) writes:
>>  Is it just me, or is L&O the show to watch if you want good writing and
>>acting?  After comparing the two so far this year, LA Law makes me sick.  It's
>>about at the point where it should end.  L&O, on the other hand, is still on
>>it's upward trend.
>
>I agree that L&O is superior, but I still like L.A. Law. I think the
>tone of the show has become much darker with Bochco & Fisher's departure
>and the arrival of Masius & Tinker (of St. Elsewhere fame). The season
>premiere of course emphasized this darkness (though I have to say the
>Homer Simpson subplot was stupid).
>
>SPOILERS FOR L.A. LAW (92/11/05) FOLLOW:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I thought Mullaney's assault prosecution of the father (who was defended
>by a nun) was interesting from a legal standpoint as well as a dramatic
>one -- the revelation of Tommy's being abused was handled well.
>
>The Brackman-goes-to-jail plot was also well done. And Stuart's recovery
>from amnesia, though a cliched TV theme, is being handled well.
>
>Jonathan's compromising his ethics to win election was timely, and
>probably quite realistic.
>
>Of course, Law & Order continues to maintain a verisimilitude never
>before seen on either police shows *or* lawyer shows. However, the
>molestation-by-gynecologist scene seemed borrowed from *The Hand That
>Rocks the Cradle*.
>
>Mathew Englander.
>
And now just think of the heat Jonathon will take for his "waffling" on the
Stuart Markowitz assault.  Anne Kelsey's gonna kill him for not sticking up
for Stuart.  He's already in Leland's doghouse.  And now "Botton Line"
Brackman has seen the light on pro-bono work.  And, has Arnie now gotten a
little more human?  But I wish they would return to some good court cases
again - that's what made the show popular.  Moving Susan Dey out of the DA's
office to a judgehsip was not a good move, and Cecil Hoffman, while a decent
actress, didn't have the hard-nose prosecutorial affect that Susan Dey did.
Maybe the writers are now trying John Spencer in that role.
-- 

------------------------
|   Gail A. Fullman    |
|   Manager - ADMO     |
|   Ext. 83113         |
------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer)
Subject: NEXP: posting on r.a.tvb / 11/9 episode
Reply-To: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer)
Organization: The John Fluke Mfg. Co.  /a.k.a. The Gizmonics Institute/
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 18:46:44 GMT

In <RSG4U2V86@linac.fnal.gov> lewis@linac.fnal.gov (June Cummins Lewis) writes:

>>Where are all the NEXP posters??  I loved our Bubble Man episode and
>
>There's a new newsgroup for NEXP watchers, but I can't post to it for
>some reason.  I really miss the NEXP discussion on r.a.t.  Is anyone
>out there in the same boat I am--a die-hard NEXP fan but unable to
>post to the NEXP newsgroup?  

Look, you want to discuss Northern Exposure?  DISCUSS.  Yeah, I'm one of the
people who can't get a.tv.nexp; so I just post here.  However, whenever I
miss posting one of my weekly semi-long reviews of NEXP in this group, everyone
starts asking "what's happened to all the NEXP posters"?

All it takes to start a discussion is a halfway-interesting article and an
audience.  You have an audience of NEXP watchers here; go for it.

--------

Finally saw the 11/9 episode last night; again, NEXP seems to have regained
their usual quirky style.  Nothing out-and-out hilarious, but all had their
moments.  What impressed me the most was that all three subplots worked
pretty well, with the return of Bill Irwin being the absolute pick of the
crop.  I hate to use the word "sweet", but watching Marilyn and the Flying
Man -- well, that's sweet, without all the cute connotations that go along
with the term.  Ed's bit had me giggling, but then I'm a Fellini non-fan, so
go figure.

As to the continuing story of the Bubble Man, I like where this is headed.
If they let Joel sit on the sidelines as a detached, semi-interested
observer to the whole affair (and perhaps toss in some self-realization of
how interested he really is), and perhaps even graduate to "friend" in terms
of Maggie.  And it might help Maggie to figure out a bit more of what *she*
wants.  All of these would be particularly nice plot twists/developments,
whether Anthony Edwards ultimately turns out to be The One for Maggie, or
he's hit by more space debris.

                           "Boy, she fell for *that*
                            one."
                                                     "I'll say!  I wonder if
                                                      we could get any Batman
                                                      junk this way."
---
                                        Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer
INTERNET:     moriarty@tc.fluke.COM
Manual UUCP:  {uunet, uw-beaver, sun, microsoft}!fluke!moriarty
CREDO:        You gotta be Cruel to be Kind...
                 **>> Keep circulating the tapes <<**
From: jm0i@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (JOSEPH ALOYSIUS MCVEIGH)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cheers Question
Date: 6 Nov 92 19:29:39 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <4748@moscom.com>, de@moscom.com (David Esan) writes:

>transition successfully?  I can't really think of many TV actor who has made
>it on the "big screen."  Burt Reynolds has done both, as has Clint Eastwood.
>Anyone else? Especially recently.  Burt and Clint were from a different time.

Sally Field, Tom Hanks, Tom Selleck, Billy Crystal, and Bruce Willis spring to
mind. However, I hasten to add that the norm is actors like Shelley Long and
MacLean Stevenson who sink like stones.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Aloysius McVeigh | "We don't want to overreact - as the federal
   jm0i@.Lehigh.edu     |  regulators have, in my judgement."
      "N.I.N.A."        |  - Bill Clinton [On banking regulation and control]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: areid@mary.fordham.edu (Darin Reid)
Subject: Fox Tuesday night?
Organization: Fordham University
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 07:28:00 GMT
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Distribution: usa
X-Posted-From: mary.fordham.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu

Whatever happend to "Key West" and "Class of '96"??  It is already November
and they're nowhere to be seen. 

- Darin
____________________________________________________________________________
Areid@Mary.Fordham.Edu || Dreid@Nyx.Cs.Du.Edu || Bz809@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu

Bitnet:areid@fordmulc.bitnet
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: morin@noao.edu (Marg Morin)
Subject: Re: Brent Spiner - credits other than ST: TNG?
Organization: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson AZ
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:33:59 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.220704.63288@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> cad3@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (CHERYL ANN DOUGHERTY) writes:
>In article <1992Nov11.001456.15630@morgan.ucs.mun.ca>, bbrett@morgan.ucs.mun.ca
>(Betsy Brett) writes:
>>
>>Okay, I know Brent is in Star Trek (Data) and he played the ill-fated
>>country hick in Night Court from time to time, but what else has Brent
>>Spiner been in aside from those?
>>
>>-Betsy Brett-
>>bbrett@morgan.ucs.mun.ca
>
>
>If I'm not mistaken, he also played the escaped convict who wanted to kill
>Diane on Cheers.
>         ~~~~~~
>--Cheryl

I just caught a few minutes of him as a lawyer in a rerun of a TV
movie past weekend. I don't know the title, but it starred Andy
Griffith as a judge who put children in jail to discipline them.
(I think it was based on a true story.)

-- 
 MARG MORIN  "Call me M"		(morin@noao.edu)  
	aka: The Seeker   		 AURA/NOAO Tucson, AZ
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 "I'm just a person trapped inside a woman's body" - Elaine Boosler 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: jarnolde@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu (John Arnolde)
Subject: Chuck Connors
Organization: Physical Sciences Lab, University of Wisconsin
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 18:14:34 GMT


As I haven't seen this posted yet, I'll do it. Actor Chuck Connors best known
for his portrayal of Lucas McCain on the long running tv western The Rifleman
died Tuesday of Lung Cancer. He was 71. Connors also played pro baseball for
the Cubs, I believe and basketball.
From: rnlee@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Profess'nal Agitator)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: WY:  Why was Winnie mad?
Date: 13 Nov 92 16:07:37 GMT
Organization: MAWL - Mudd Alums Without Lives

In article <BxMCIK.JFE@news.cso.uiuc.edu> ziauddin@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (Tasneem Ziauddin) writes:
>I saw the show yesterday after missing a couple of episodes and thus I did
>not know why Winnie had broken up with Kevin.  His friend said something
>like, "You embarrassed her and almost ruined her reputation" (something to
>that effect).  What did Kevin do?

Major Spoilers!!


Well, it all started last ep (two weeks ago) in the locker room.  Some
of the guys were harassing one of Kevin's friends about only getting
"so far" on his date.  Kevin stupidly opens his mouth, so they focus
their attention on him, esp. since he's been going out with Winnie
(albeit off and on) for over six years.  Fortunately, he gets off the
hook.

Then, his parents leave for the night for some event, and Wayne is out
too, so Kevin has the entire house to himself.  He decides to invite
Winnie over "to study for the SAT" with other things on his mind.  In
the end, she spends the entire night there.  They fell asleep on the
couch in front of the TV.

The next morning, Kevin rushes Winnie home.  Later, at school, she
says something to the effect that it was no problem with her parents,
and they were relieved that she spent the night with Kevin.  "Although
I should have felt relived, I actually felt insulted."  Unfortunately
for him, his frustration is blatantly obvious in the locker room, and
this time he has to "talk the talk".  He tells them that they spent
the entire night together and to "use your imagination".  Well, they
do, and now its free in the rumor mill.  All hell breaks loose during
lunch when a crowd of guys congratulates Kevin while a group of girls
no doubt asks Winnie the same things.  By the time, Kevin makes it out
of the crowd, Winnie is gone.

Kevin tries to get some sympathy from his dad, but he'll have none of
it.  "If I were you, I'd go over there now, and apologize.  And hope
that she'll take you back.  I wouldn't."  And she doesn't.

Personally, I think the writers let him off the hook too easily.  I
think Winnie should've let him twist in the wind for at least one more ep.

"You embarrassed her, you ruined her reputation, and you lied about
your relationship, but other than that you're doing just fine."

Agitator
  #->

*Bubble Gum Crisis-Kimagure Orange Road-Dirty Pair-Macross-Urusei Yatsura*
*Maison Ikkoku-Honneamise-Riding Bean-Venus Wars-Megazone 23-//-Lupin III*
*------------- R E M E M B E R   B E I J I N G -------------//-----------*
*IBM PC - Who wants a politically correct computer?     \\ // Only AMIGA!*
*================================ Bring Back the Caltech \X/ Cannon!! ===*
*Roderick Lee, HMC '91    "The Professional Agitator"   agitator@ucsd.edu*
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Ren & Stimpy Fans...
From: <RK0VSANU@MIAMIU.BITNET>
Date: Sunday, 8 Nov 1992 15:24:51 EST
Organization: Miami University - Academic Computer Service

I heard that the latest Ren & Stimpy featured Sven Hoek?  Would this
be Ren's brother?  Does anyone have a script from any of the Ren & Stimpy
episodes?  If so, I would be VERY interested in having a copy!
 
Question to all Ren & Stimpy fanatics...
 
Who is your favorite character, and why?
 
My vote goes to Mr. Horse.  I think that his performance in the "Rubber
Nipple Salesmen" episode deserves some type of award.  Here's the ultimate
Horse quote:
 
"Rubble nipples, huh?  Hmmmmmm...No sir, I don't think I need rubber nipples.
I'll tell you what, though.  Do you have any rubber walrus protectors?"
 
---------------
Ryan "Powdered Toast Man" Kearns
"You don't know how to sell anything!  You can't even whiz by yourself!"
 
                                          - Ren
From: jsp@uts.amdahl.com (James Preston)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Opinions about the Evil Leaper Episode
Date: 11 Nov 92 21:58:59 GMT
Reply-To: jsp@pls.amdahl.com
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

charles@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Charles Jacob Cohen) writes:

}Spoiler Alert:


}1.  Who was the evil leaper?  

}2.  Where is the evil leaper from?  This was not clear at all.  

If I had been Sam, the very first question I would have asked her was
when and where she was from.  If only out of the hope that she might
be able to help me to get back to my own time.

}3.  Why did everything revert at the end?  This, to me, didn't make sense
}at all.  

Yup.  It was a total contrivance to leave us with a nice, tidy, happy
package at the end instead of making the writers actually WRITE something.
But then, those responsible for the show said before this season started
that since they made the "rules", they could "break" them anytime they
wanted, and they intended to do some breaking this season.

}4.  Can Sam really stop Alia from doing evil things?  

}5.  What was I hoping for from all the previews?  I really wanted to
}see another leaper from the future. She didn't have to be evil, but
}she could have been controlled by an evil source!  For example, what
}if Alia and Zowie were from a parallel time-line Earth, where another
}government (British, due to the accent?) was the world power.  They
}might not be evil, but the government might want to ensure they stay
}in power.  

Agreed.  Something like this would have made MUCH more sense and left 
the door open for MANY more interesting possibilities for a return
match between the two.

6. How stupid and/or ignorant was the brother?  The show took place in
1966, right?  When did John Kennedy make his famous "man to the moon
and back safely before the decade is out" speech?  What was the goal
of NASA, and Gemini, and the entire space program in 1966?  To get ready
to send a man to the moon, damnit!  In 1966, you'd have to have been
living in a cave for the last six years to make fun of the idea of
sending a man to the moon the way he did when Sam suggested it.  His
response was absolutely ludicrous.

}Was anyone else disappointed and hoping for more?  

I certainly was disappointed, but then, not being a particular fan of
the show, I wasn't hoping for much either.

--James Preston
From: eah4@po.CWRU.Edu (Elizabeth A. Hlabse)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: QL: Deliver Us From Evil *SPOILERS*
Date: 13 Nov 1992 13:32:20 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: eah4@po.CWRU.Edu (Elizabeth A. Hlabse)
NNTP-Posting-Host: thor.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, dlb@fanny.wash.inmet.com (David Barton) says:

>Well, it's come and gone.
>
>No spoilers, but opinions.
>
>Four-fifths of the way, great stuff.  Suddenly, it sucks.  Big time.
>
>So, I did the obvious thing,  I re-wrote the ending in my mind.  No
>more cop-out.  Happy ending.  I LOVE it!
>
>Now, I can say without a shadow of a doubt:  I LOVE this episode!!
>
>If people are interested, I will post my "Alternate Ending to Deliver
>Us From Evil".  Otherwise, I will simply enjoy it.  It was a great
>episode (at least, MINE was).

I'm interested.  Post it.
-- 
             Beth Hlabse    eah4@po.CWRU.Edu     Assistant Sysop
                The Science Fiction and Fantasy Sig (GO SCIFI)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      And it harm none, do as you will.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: jdavis@bordeaux.kpno.noao.edu (Jim Davis)
Subject: Re: Nickelodeon: Clarissa Explains It All
Organization: Thomas Tupper Jr. High
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 02:25:31 GMT

In article <6g51TB1w165w@west.darkside.com> susskind@west.darkside.com (Mark Susskind) writes:
>Hello.  I would like to know what times Nickelodeon plays Clarissa
>Explains It All.  I first started watching it last season, and I quickly
>liked it.  However, I do not always have access to the cable tv set or
>the vcr Saturday nights at ET 8:00 PM, so I would like to know if it
>is shown at any other times.

Unfortunately not.  Used to be on twice on Sundays; now it's moved to the
start of Nick's SNICK block on Saturday night, and only shown then.  (Not
this week, though; preempted for some-awards-show.)

You might check out the Clarissa mailing list if you like the show; send
your email address to clarissa-request@ferkel.ucsb.edu to be added.
-- 
Jim Davis            | "Knock it off, Uncle Owen.  Get an afterlife!"
jdavis@noao.edu      |   -- Clarissa Darling
From: curtis@optima.UUCP (Curtis E. Dyreson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cheers Question
Date: 5 Nov 92 16:19:49 GMT

From article <4748@moscom.com>, by de@moscom.com (David Esan):
> transition successfully?  I can't really think of many TV actor who has made 
> it on the "big screen."  Burt Reynolds has done both, as has Clint Eastwood.
> Anyone else? Especially recently.  Burt and Clint were from a different time.

Judging by recent movie comedies (last 15 years) it'd be hard to throw a 
brick without hitting a former SCTV/SNL cast member.  And then there's 
M.J. Fox (Family Ties), though perhaps he really won't ever make it "big."
Tom Hanks (Bosom Buddies) even appeared in "Big".  Finally, John Ritter
(Three's Company) has had equally distinguished TV and movie careers.
And that's just some of the male actors.

Curtis Dyreson
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: wildcat@niwot.scd.ucar.edu (Wes Wildcat)
Subject: Re: TV-movie transition (was Cheers Q)
Organization: Scientific Computing Divison/NCAR Boulder, CO
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 16:39:22 GMT


	Molly Ringwold was one of the original Facts of Life girls.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: mbarnett@devnet (Mike Barnett)
Subject: QL: "Star Light, Star Bright"
Organization: Locus Computing Corporation, Inglewood, CA
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 23:09:16 GMT

Well, it has been a long time since I posted anything about QL.  However,
after reading all the comments regarding the previous episode("Star Light,
Star Bright"), I wanted to inject my thoughts since nobody mentioned anything
about the ending of the episode.  Unlike many people, I actually enjoyed the
episode.  I certainly liked it more than the inane fluff episode("Leaping
of the Shrew") with Brooke Shields.  However, the ending of this episode
bothered me.  I thought the best ending would have Sam leaping just after
the UFO is sighted.  At this point, all had been accomplished.  Father and
son are on their way to having a better relationship.  Also, the grandfather
has proven that he is not crazy.  However, IMHO, the writers decide to tack
on a stupid ending by having the grandfather say goodbye and run off with
the aliens(?) to Never Never Land.  I can't see any good point to ending the
episode in such a manner.
 

Mike Barnett(mbarnett@locus.com)

Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: ziauddin@osiris.cso.uiuc.edu (Tasneem Ziauddin)
Subject: WY:  Why was Winnie mad?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 19:51:54 GMT

I saw the show yesterday after missing a couple of episodes and thus I did
not know why Winnie had broken up with Kevin.  His friend said something
like, "You embarrassed her and almost ruined her reputation" (something to
that effect).  What did Kevin do?

Thanks in advance.
From: karenk@hpgrla.gr.hp.com (Karen Klemm)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 17:06:03 GMT
Subject: Re: Herman's Head
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Greeley, CO
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv


You know,
I like "Herman's Head", but it would be interesting to see TV-land do
a sitcom (in good taste) about a 23-year-old female professional, who sleeps
with people of the opposite sex as often as Herman does, and still manages
to retain the respect and admiration of co-workers and the audience.

Would it be possible?  Would it be entertaining?

Karen
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: ala@fico.uucp
Subject: 2000 Malibu Road
Reply-To: ala@fico.UUCP (Adryenn Ashley)
Organization: The Fair, Isaac Companies, San Rafael, California
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 17:47:52 GMT

Has anyone heard anything about what is going to happen to 2000 Malibu
Road?  I have called some friends in LA, but they don't know anything
either.  Anyone got any info?

thanks,
Adryenn

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  A A   apple!fico!ala           |  A mind once stretched by a new idea never
  D S   uunet!jandel!fico!ala    |  regains its original dimension.
  R H                            |  -Oliver Wendell Holmes
  Y L   Fair, Isaac Companies    +---------------------------------------------
  E E   120 N. Redwood Blvd      |  My opinions are my own (including the
  N Y   San Rafael, CA  94903    |  typos), and do not reflect those of FICO.
  N                              |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: I nees your affiliates (NBC,ABC,CBS,Fox,DuMont)
Date: 9 Nov 92 05:34:28 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout

In article <7NOV199216023628@mary.fordham.edu> areid@mary.fordham.edu (Darin Reid) writes:
<>Then I suggest that you rephrase your posting to ask for the channel line-ups
<>when the DuMont network existed.  Channel numbers and station call letters,
<>etc., have changed over the years.  You posting made it sound like you wanted
<>the current lineup.  Please ask for what you really want.  You can't assume
<>anything when posting.
<
<Believe it or not I think that people are basically smart, and since DuMont
<hasn't existed since the 1950's no one can give me a "current lineup".  
<Anyone who read my post and didn't know what DuMont was wrote me (with 
<their ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox affils) and asked what it was.  I posted a 
<message with info on it later...

You proved my point.  While they may have asked what DuMont was, you still got
the current lineup.  If you would have asked the question correctly the first
time, you would only have gotten responses from those who knew the answer, or
where to fetch it.
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv