From: Marc.Ringuette@daisy.learning.cs.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Backgammon books
Organization: The Ohio State University Department of Computer and Information Science
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 16:39:00 GMT

> The book that got _me_ rather hooked on Backgammon was a book called
> "Backgammon for Blood" by someone whose name eludes me.

Eww, gross.  Time for a repost.  

Most of the books below are for the advanced player; start with "Backgammon"
by Paul Magriel, which is the Old Testament of backgammon books, and which
you can find in most libraries.  Second is "Backgammon for Profit" by Joe
Dwek, a good book of problems.  Barclay Cooke's books, especially
Championship Backgammon, are OK.  Robertie's "Advanced Backgammon" is quickly
becoming the New Testament and is a must for an intermediate player who's
read Magriel.


[ Marc Ringuette | Cranberry Melon University, Cucumber Science Department  ]
[ mnr@cs.cmu.edu | 412-268-3728 |      ".surivorter erutangis a ma I"       ]



From: hunter@work.nlm.nih.gov (Larry Hunter)
Subject: Bibliography
Date: 21 May 92 20:11:35 GMT


One more for the FAQ.  Before Marty Storer left the list, I pestered
him for an annotated bibliography.  He came through in grand style.
Here it is:

Must have:

_Backgammon_, Paul Magriel, NY Times/Quadrangle Press, New York 1976.
  The best introduction to the game.  Covers basic checker play very well.
  If you read and thoroughly understand this book, you'll play a decent game.
  Weaknesses--skimpy treatment of the doubling cube.

_Genud_vs_Dwek:_The_1981_World_Backgammon_Championship_ (or similar title),
Bill Robertie, The Gammon Press, Arlington, Mass. 1982.
  Very thorough coverage of the 25-point finals of the 1981 Monte Carlo
  tournament.  Goes into quite a bit of detail about ins and outs of match play.
  Excellent section on backgames.  I've referred to this as Robertie(red)
  since it has a red cover 8-).

_Backgammon_With_The_Champions_, Kent Goulding, ~1980-82.
  Series of annotated matches between good players.  Forget how many in all.
  Excellent material, giving very good insight into how top players think.
  Commentary by Goulding, often in collaboration with Kit Woolsey; both of
  these guys are very, very strong players.  Let's see, the matches are
  Seidel vs. Hodis; Magriel vs. Sconyers; Genud vs. Posner; Pasko vs.
  Motakhasses; two (?) 5-point matches in one volume:  Lester vs. Horan and
  Woolsey vs. Pasko; Robertie vs. Senkiewicz; Goulding vs. Maxakuli;
  Dwek vs. Chafetz; Ballard vs. Lubetkin; Eisenberg vs. Magriel(?); and
  more I can't remember.  I can't recommend this series too highly (though
  Genud vs. Posner was a lousy match).
 
_Advanced_Backgammon_ (2nd edition; two volumes), Bill Robertie, Gammon Press,
 Arlington, Mass. '91.
  I haven't seen this yet--only the first edition of one volume.  Series of
  problems, giving very good introduction to truly advanced concepts.  Errors
  in first edition are supposedly corrected.  The first edition is what I
  call Robertie(blue); the second is Robertie(white).

_Backgammon_Times_, all back editions.
  This was a very good backgammon newspaper that was around in about '82-'83.
  A lot of interesting articles by top players and analysts.  Probably hard
  to get these days.

_Reno_1986_, Bill Robertie, The Gammon Press, Arlington, Mass. 1987.
  Two annotated matches from the very strong Reno tournament of '86.  Semifinal
  match is between Nack Ballard and Mike Senkiewicz; an excellent match, well
  annotated.  Finals between Ballard and Howard Markowitz.  The book is in
  quiz format, so you can test your skill against Ballard's (well, kind of:
  Ballard had to find his moves over-the-board under great pressure--nothing
  like the finals of a big tournament to get the adrenalin flowing!).  I've
  only found a couple of mistakes in the annotations.  This book is referred
  to as Robertie(yellow).

_World_Class_Backgammon_,_Move_By_Move_, Roy Friedman, 1989 or 90; forget
other publication info.
  Annotated matches between Robertie and "international star" Rick Barabino
  (Barabino is strong, but "international star"--I dunno...).  Three 9-point
  matches with some excellent games (check out the second game of the first
  match particularly).  Annotations are very good; Friedman put a lot of work
  into rolling out many of the diagrammed positions.  The annotation style
  is terse; Friedman takes a very scientific approach.

_Vision_Laughs_at_Counting_ (two volumes), Danny Kleinman, ~1978.
-all other material by Kleinman is "must have"--write to him at 5312-1/2
Village Green, Los Angeles, CA 90016 and tell him I sent ya.
  Seminal work on match play, money play, doubling cube, races, and more.
  Kleinman is very prolific.  His analyses are often more mathematical than
  the average reader can handle, but Real Mathematicians [tm] and even the
  layperson with math aptitude shouldn't be fazed.  A Real Mathematician
  wouldn't call Kleinman's math "deep", but it sure is accurate, and you
  won't find anything similar anywhere else.  He does the important work
  of formulating the right problems the right way, where many others couldn't.

  Drawbacks:  his books are self-published with lousy layout and graphics.
  He's supposedly not that great a player (I've never seen him play), so
  his analyses often lack the world-class insight into the thought processes
  of the strong practical player that you could get from a Goulding or a
  Robertie.  In particular, his middle-game intuition seems less than world-class.
  But these drawbacks are more than made up for by the wealth of information
  in his books, which I still haven't completely soaked up after many years.
  Kleinman is a subtle thinker and a meticulous analyst of the countable, and
  he does a lot to develop backgammon "vision."  His stuff is often uproariously
  funny, but sometimes one gets impatient trying to filter out what's relevant
  to the practical player from the humor.

  I repeat--all his books are "must have's" for the serious player.  They're
  a bit expensive since I think he bears all the production costs himself,
  but for the serious player they're worth every cent.


Pretty Good Books But Not "Must Have's":

  _Backgammon_For_Profit_, Joe Dwek, Stein and Day, New York 1975 (out of print)
    Problems that would now be considered fairly basic.  Almost all solutions
    are right.  Tables of replies to opening moves show how badly people played
    in 1975.

  _Paradoxes_and_Probabilities_, Barclay Cooke, Random House, New York 1978.
    This is almost a "must have."  168 problems, most of which are very
    interesting.  Current thinking is that solutions to about a third of them
    are wrong, but the analysis gives very good insight into how Cooke, a
    first-generation world class player, thought about backgammon.

  _The_Doubling_Cube_In_Backgammon_, Jeff Ward, Aquarian Enterprises,
  San Diego 1982.
    Goes into basic doubling-cube concepts and gives some benchmark positions
    with equities derived from rollouts.  Gives some bearoff tables, etc.
    Analysis of benchmark positions is pretty good but sometimes skimpy;
    Ward only admits to having done 100-200 rollouts to derive his equities.
    Worth having.

  _Backgammon_Master_Games_, Bill Kennedy and Chuck Papazian, 1982 (forget
  other publication info).
    Annotated games and positions from master match play.  Analysis is largely
    based on intuitive concepts, and isn't well grounded in match-equity
    considerations etc.  Not well supported by rollouts; a fair amount of
    errors, but the analysis overall is pretty sound.

Other books that I've read aren't worth much, including _Competitive_Backgammon_
Vol._II_, Mike Labins, Marty Storer, and Bill Tallmadge, Competitive Backgammon
Publications, Syracuse 1981.  (It was good for the time but would be considered
lousy now.)

As I mentioned before, you can reach Gammon Press at (617)641-2091,
fax: (617)648-8041 or PO Box 294 Arlington, MA 02174 USA

						Larry
--
Lawrence Hunter, PhD.
National Library of Medicine
Bldg. 38A, MS-54
Bethesda. MD 20894
(301) 496-9300
(301) 496-0673 (fax)
hunter@nlm.nih.gov (internet)
Newsgroups: rec.games.trivia