HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: grendel@camelot.bradley.edu (Alyosha Bourgea)
Subject: Re: STOCKDALE ?!?!
Organization: Bradley University
Distribution: world,usa,alt,na
Date: 14 Oct 92 18:04:21 GMT

In <1992Oct14.073545.43835@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> miner@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:

>In article <1bgqgsINN1ec@clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, ecpzp@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr V A Noronha) writes:
>> 
>> Get this guy Stockdale!
>> 
>> He's inarticlate, confused, purely bewildered.
>> 
>> Did he turn on his hearing aid at all?
>> 
>> And to think he might be one heart beat from the Presidency.
>> 
>> Or this Ross Perot's secret weapon to make sure he doesn't do well enough to help Bush by ousting Clinton?

>Is *everything* image, personality, acting, memorizing lines?  I for
>one found Stockdale bloody refreshing.  I found myself paying more
>attention to what he did say because I already knew what the others
>would say.  And really: if I had to choose right now whether I'd
>like to have Stockdale or Quayle a heartbeat from the presidency, I
>really think I'd feel better about being an American if it were
>Stockdale.  Conservatism has good minds, but they're tucked away in
>universities and on C-Span lectures and panels: they *just don't run
>for office* and that's the whole problem with Conservatism.

Stockdale was the nightmare image of Perot that people come up with when
they're thinking of reasons not to vote for him.  He's clearly out of
touch with the issues.  Image did have a lot to do with his weakness,
but even when you just looked at what he was saying, there wasn't much.
Basically he deferred to his "boss".  He had no plans.  His high points
of the evening were when he made simple, sound-bitish statements that
showed the others up.  That's negative campaigning, and it works, but it's
not enough if you have nothing positive to say as well.
From: hooker@aristotle.ils.nwu.edu ( BOB HOOKER)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: The Limbaugh Poll
Date: 13 Oct 92 18:40:03 GMT
Organization: ILS

In article <crb2.718902249@Ra.MsState.Edu>, crb2@Ra.MsState.Edu (Chad R.
Berthelson) writes:
 >(WR poll, which hasn't ever been wrong in picking a president (36 yrs)
says >   Bush has 55%) 


Do you mean the Weekly Reader Poll of Elementary school students grade 1 to
4.
So a poll of 6 to 10 year olds is of equal merit to LA Times of NYT polls?

No Comment.

4 more weeks!
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:7666 alt.activism.d:3924 alt.politics.elections:17380 alt.politics.bush:9544 alt.politics.clinton:11056 talk.politics.misc:52535 talk.abortion:43095
From: e91petmo@odalix.ida.liu.se (Peter Modin; remember that name...)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.activism.d,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Date: 16 Oct 92 16:11:26 GMT
Organization: CIS Dept, Univ of Linkoping, Sweden

sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>                    Most of the users here would probably want me
>off the net, since my views are offensive to all.

>Simon

Sure! And we'll all post messages like, "Yeah, George, I really agree with
you on that issue", or "Another reason to think just like we do is...",
"As everybody else on the net, I think [women should have a choice/
unborn children must be protected, pick one]". Bo-ring!!
--
=================================================================
| Peter Modin C92       | EMail: e91petmo@und.ida.liu.se        |
| Rydsvagen 240 B:11    |               -"Come forth and win my |
| S-582 51  LINKOPING   |  \\\  Amiga     eternal love", God    |
| Int. +46 13 17 81 01  |   \\\ user!     said to Moses. But,   |
| SWEDEN                |    \\\ ///      he came fifth and won |
|                       |     \\X//       a toaster.            |
=== Dept. of Computer Science, Linkoping University, Sweden  ====
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:16:25 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery

In article <1992Oct8.080459.1392@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>,
sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) wrote:
> 
> To paraphrase your comments: You said that my attitudes seemed "callous"
> towards the woman involved--actually I am not.  I never said anything 
> against a woman's right to decide for herself.  I am against abortion being 
> discussed as the only option.

So you'll allow women to make any decision they like, as long as it's the
one you want, is that right?

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
From: kgirodias@azcc.arizona.edu
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: The Limbaugh Poll
Date: 12 Oct 92 17:42:29 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

In article <1992Oct10.194904.4504@seq.uncwil.edu>, session@seq.uncwil.edu (Zack C. Sessions) writes:
> checksix@flyboy.EBay.Sun.COM (Al Conte) writes:
> 
>>Listening to Rush today, I noticed that he was taking a poll on who is lining
>>up for who for the election.
>>Well, the count was still under way but, his poll showed a 91% run for Bush, a
>>4% + for Willy, and a 4% + for the Parrot.
>>
>>Amazing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 
> On the contrary, it is not amazing at all, considering the average dittohead
> who listens to Limbaugh. Any poll taken by Limbaugh is going to be guarenteed
> to have margin of error of 90%.
> 
> -- 
> Zack Sessions
> sessions@seq.uncwil.edu
> University of North Carolina at Wilmington
> "Good health is merely the slowest form of dying."

Hey Zach, you are absolutly correct on this on!!

Ken
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 04:05:09 GMT

In article <1992Oct11.010544.21220@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
><1992Oct10.051024.29239@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>><BvrJI4.Is1@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> greens@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Shawn Green) :
>...
>>As the people depicted in my planned novel will be.   In my version of the
>>future, there's a scene where there are pro-choicers at an abortion clinic,
>>and the pro-lifers show u, and proceed to use truncheons.  The police
>>then show, and instead of arresting the pro-lifers, they join in with them
>>against the pro-choice people.  But then the PC crowd would have a fit....
>
>We'll see your truncheons and raise you fully automatic weapons.  We'll
>get you to your god that much faster. :-)
>
Well, I plan to depict the riot police being fully armed, and using
white posphorus instead of tear gas.  Now, since in my story assulting
police officers, especially pulling guns on them, would be a capital offense,
those who escaped would either face on the spot execution,or the death penalty
after trial.  f course, this would all be televised, to make examples of the
criminals.   Now, let's see the book buring the PC crowd would stage.

Simon
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: Cessna@kn5f.jsc.nasa.gov (Mark T. Evert)
Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh on Feminism
Organization: Loral Space Information Systems
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 15:53:57 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.061754.15221@s1.gov> lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich) 
writes:
>         It is sometimes said of RL's use of "feminazi" that there is a
> certain kind of extremist feminist that it appropriately refers to.
> While there are _some_ feminists that can be called extremists, I
> think that RL is trying to smear _all_ feminists, since he has not
> described what he considers legitimate feminist positions.

I disagree!  His position can be extrapolated based on his comments to 
callers.  I've heard him question several callers who claimed to be 
feminist.  He questions the callers about their positions that they have 
to qualify themselves as feminists and then differentiates between those 
positions and the feminazi positions.

My basic interpretation of his views is that females should be given the 
same opportunitiy as anyone else to choose and pursue a career while 
recognizing that there are inherent differences between the sexes that may 
make one or the other less suitable for certain tasks.  His views on 
abortion and the official NOW position play a role in his definition.  
Extreme anti-male views such as "all sex is rape" play a role in his 
definition of a feminazi.

He is obviously not against women working or holding positions of higher 
authority.  He has frequently  and proudly pointed out the many Republican 
females who hold high positions within government.

Mark T. Evert
Friendswood, TX

My opinions are strictly my own.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc,talk.abortion
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: I think I like this Booth
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 22:36:56 GMT

sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
] In article <1992Oct11.005152.18738@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
] ><1992Oct2.042310.4735@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
] >>Someone here has said that rights only apply if a fetus is aware.
] >>
] >>Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but can't a pregnant woman feel the child
] >>moving about??  Does that not constitute awareness??
] >
] >Trees move in the wind.  Bacon moves when it sizzles.  Fires moves as its
] >fuel is consumed.
] >
] Get serious, please.  You know fully well what I was talking about.
] Unless the truth makes you uncomfortable.....                :)
] 
] Simon

Ok, I bite,

The woman is aware, as she can sense movement....

And that makes you Uncomfortable, as it 
suggests that women are People Too? 

And maybe, Just Maybe, If we acknowledge women
to be people, then its obvious that we might have
to allow them the same rights as People?

And that this would mean that an argument between
a Real Person, once we accept that women MIGHT
ACTUALLY BE PERSONS, is going to conflict with
the Rights of PotentialPersons, {just as we all
Know tha when the Lucky Winners get to the
Top of the BigFerrisWheelOfKharma they come back
to Life as US Citizens, and Thus All the People
in the World Are Really US Citizens, as they
could Become Really Re_incarnated US Citizens, and
not MERELY Potentially US Citizens...} and that
MAYBE we should take Care of the REAL PERSONS FIRST?

OH NO!!!!!

You didn't mean to say that.....


ciao
drieux


ps: I don't think that arguing 'awareness' is a good
criterion to argue for 'personhood' - it Might Keep
George Out of the LOOP.




-- 
Modern Day Problems:

Don't Just Rock the Vote
Kick OUT THE JAMS!
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.elections,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
From: larry@peak.psl.nmsu.edu (Evil Engineer doin' it the Cowboy Way)
Subject: Re: More deception from your hero, not mine
Organization: New Mexico State University, MetaPhysical Science Laboratory
	<BvE66s.9KB@apollo.hp.com> <1992Oct7.030042.16802@cbnewse.cb.att.com>
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 18:21:47 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.030042.16802@cbnewse.cb.att.com> harryo@cbnewse.cb.att.com (harold.r.holm) writes:
    [...]
   > 
   Tell us, what is conservatism as a philosophical viewpoint for you?
   What would you say constitutes it, and *how* do Limbaugh/Buchanan
   differ from it?  I'd say you really don't have much to go on.  YOU
   PEOPLE are just intimidated because there are now strident spokesmen
   out their who don't fit your convenient little image as shy, withdrawn
   "pocket mice", but who are as fierce and in-your-face as any militant feminist,
   and you just are so frustrated and don't know how to *deal* with it,  
   DO YOU?  Well, get used to it.  Your meek little pet pocket mice
   have been supplanted by a couple of guardian dobermans, and it's about
   time conservatism had a couple to keep all you liberal-left alley cats 
   from having total run of the neighborhood.  ROWF!!  They're here to stay!

Whooo whooo!
We're shakin' in our evil liberal boots here!

(Here, doggy, doggy..)

L.
"Yeh, Buddy..            | larry@psl.nmsu.edu (Larry Cunningham)|  _~~_
 I've got your COMPUTER! | % Physical Science Laboratory        | (O)(-)
 Right HERE!!"           | New Mexico State University          |  /..\ 
 (computer THIS!)        | Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 88003    |   <> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are CORRECT, mine, and not PSLs or NMSUs..
Wonder if Sununu's fired now?
From: dbernard@thewho.Central.Sun.COM (Dave Bernard)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: RUSH: OUT OF A JOB?
Date: 7 Oct 92 14:25:28 GMT
Reply-To: dbernard@thewho.Central.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems


>What will happen in four weeks when Clinton is elected?  Will Rush admit
>that he's wrong and that Reagonomics were wrong?  Boy, wouldn't it be
>great to see Rush go away and someone intelligent like Ray Taliaferro
>take his place?  I'd like that....
  
Actually, in that scenario, Rush will be more popular than ever.  He would
gain as fans thousands of disgruntled Clinton supporters, who expected Clinton
to somehow magically turn the economy around.

If Clinton is elected, he will be a one-termer, and like Jimmy Carter, guarantee
a Republican is elected in 96.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.activism.d,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc,talk.abortion
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 01:08:11 GMT

In article <1992Oct13.192345.27853@sbctri.sbc.com> asper@sbctri.sbc.com (Alan E. Asper) writes:
>In article <1687F9CC8.MCMASTER@LSTC2VM.stortek.com> MCMASTER@LSTC2VM.stortek.com (Jim McMaster) writes:
>>sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>>
>
>(Booth's stupid "flame" deleted)
>(McMaster's "terribly, terribly hurt" rejoinder deleted)
>
>Why are we wasting time on this 14-year-old from San Antonio?
>
Uh, folks, I'm 22, you're way off on my age again!!

Simon
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.activism.d,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc,talk.abortion
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 08:11:07 GMT


Abstinence is indeed a dirty word around here.  I would refrain from
using it if I were you.                                          :)


Simon

Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: jorgense@plains.NoDak.edu (Lee A. Jorgensen)
Subject: Re: Columbus Day, 1992
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 05:50:04 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

In article <39415@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> pvanmeur@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (Pim van Meurs) writes:
)
)A good thing G*d does not read these newsgroups, otherwise man would
)she be upset.

hmmm .... God as a swear word.  Then what about Jesus?  Or ... Holy Ghost?

please get your 'facts' straight before you post.  (HINT:  God isn't a woman)
NOR a swear word.

-Lee.

-- 
Lee Jorgensen             Internet: jorgense@plains.NoDak.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------
                      PartyPartyParty ...
"It is not wise to step in front of a speeding car ..."  - Me
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.activism.d,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc,talk.abortion
From: tsv@dbrus.Unify.Com (Tim Vannaman)
Subject: Re: Ultraconservatism in the US today
Organization: /usr/lib/news/organization
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 92 19:23:17 GMT

[stuff deleted]

>    Our only chance to save the country, is to end social programs,
> end tarriffs, tighten our belts and pay off the debt. Yes it would cause a 
> recession, but like the Russians, we have become used to the government 
> providing for us instead of ourselves.
>
>     A frightened conservative.

Good 'ole FDR is the one who started the use of mass social programs (a demo).
What's funny is that he started many programs that had started ealier in Nazi
Germany.  Don't get me wrong, some of the programs  he started did some good,
I think what happened is the war started and the  economy picked up again and
it made his programs look better then they actually were. (the war is what 
jump started the economy).

I'd like to king for a week and go thru Washington and weed out all the
corruption.

Tim.

--
Tim Vannaman, Premium Technical Support Engineer   Phone: (916) 928-6433
Unify Corporation, Sacramento, California    Fax: (916) 928-6403
tsv@unify.Com  or  {{ucdavis,csun,lll-crg}!csusac,pyramid,sequent}!unify!tsv
From: jdahl@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Jared Dahl)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Republican Election Tactics
Date: 15 Oct 92 23:41:06 GMT
Organization: IBM Rochester
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM


I've got 'em all figured out.  

   1.  Make the other guy look like the anti-christ.
   2.  Bow down to the religious right.
   3.  Say nothing about your own plans.
   4.  Shift blame to the Congress.
   5.  Wave the bloody shirt!

Simple as pie.  Seen this done in student body elections
on campus(except 2).  And for those of you who don't 
know what "waving the bloody shirt" means, read about
the campaigns of almost any president elected after the 
Civil War(esp. US Grant).


Jared Dahl

Opinions expressed are mine, not my employers.
From: gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary L. Newell)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: STOCKDALE ?!?!
Date: 14 Oct 92 19:15:31 GMT
Distribution: world,usa,alt,na
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <1bgqgsINN1ec@clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk>, ecpzp@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr V A Noronha) writes:
> Get this guy Stockdale!
> He's inarticlate, confused, purely bewildered.

 The nconservatives must love him - I mean Reagan was all that and more...

> And to think he might be one heart beat from the Presidency.

Yeah  - I know I feel much safer with Dan sitting in the office...


				gln
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: tilley@fsg.UUCP (Tom Tilley)
Subject: Re: Bush's attack on Clinton's Arkansas have some
Reply-To: tilley@sunfse.ese.lmsc.lockheed.com
Organization: LMSC, Sunnyvale
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 18:55:10 GMT


In article <1992Oct9.231216.2850@nic.csu.net> jtinkle@sparc1.sparc1.csubak.edu (j. tinkle ) writes:
>>In article <clinton-arkansasUR4d2_2SQ@clarinet.com>, clarinews@clarinet.com
>>(STEPHEN BUEL) writes:
>>>  _U_P_I _N_e_w_s_F_e_a_t_u_r_e
>>>  
>>> 	LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (UPI) - President Bush turned up the heat on his
>>> Democratic opponent last week, [... Stuff deleted ...]
>>> 	... ``The more the day went on, the more his hyperbole grew,'' said
>>> Betsey Wright, deputy chair of the Clinton campaign, ...
>
> [Typed-laughter deleted.]
>
>"hyperbole"?  What does she think she's talking about?? Calculus?

Not likely.

From _American Heritage Dictionary, Second College Edition_:

hyperbole n. An exaggeration or extravagant statement used as a figure of
speech, as "I could sleep for a year", or "This book weighs a ton".

You must have a fascinating calculus instructor :-)

Tom.


#--------------------------------------------------#
| Tom Tilley                                       |
| Internet : tilley@sunfse.ese.lmsc.lockheed.com   |
From: William.A.Hall.Jr.@dartmouth.edu (William A. Hall Jr.)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Quayle won the debate.
Date: 16 Oct 92 00:42:27 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
X-Posted-From: InterNews1.0a5@newshost.dartmouth.edu

In article <92289.29458.J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM>
J056600@LMSC5.IS.LMSC.LOCKHEED.COM writes:

> "Take a breath, Al.  Lighten up." -- Dan Quayle to Al Gore, 10/13/92

No, no. You don't have the full quote. 8)

"Take a breath, Al. Lighten up. Inhale."

------------------------------------------------
William Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.activism.d,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.clinton,talk.politics.misc,talk.abortion
From: weverett@jarthur.claremont.edu (William M. Everett)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Keywords: significant words from a document used as an index to content
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 06:07:04 GMT

In article <1992Oct11.152434.17046@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> StarOwl@uiuc.edu writes:
>William.A.Hall.Jr.@dartmouth.edu (William A. Hall Jr.) writes:
>
>: That's why I am pro-life. I believe every individual -- born or unborn
>: -- has the potential to make a positive impact on society, and should
>: have the opportunity to do so (before AND after birth!) Unlike many
>: pro-life individuals whose primary concern is in the womb, I also
>: believe as much in getting kids out of the ghetto.
>
>Unfortunately an equivalent but opposite argument can be made.
>
>"I believe every individual -- born or unborn -- has the potential to
>make a negative impact on society."  You never know if that clump
>of cells in a woman's body is going to become the world's next
>politician, lawyer, mass-murderer, or Klan leader.
>
>Michael Adams >

	In this country, people are considered innocent until proven guilty.
You cannot punish someone because they might commit a crime. 
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: smgarvin@nyx.cs.du.edu (susan garvin)
Subject: Re: Walking down to the student center last night
Followup-To: talk.abortion
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Keywords: I guess Simple Simon is too obvious, huh?
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 92 02:35:58 GMT

In article <1992Oct15.235241.14221@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.ut
a.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:

>And you think I'm being silly????      Oh- I'm looking fora modem softwa
e
>package with the right terminal emulation to allow actual editing of pos
ings,
>so eventually this problem will be solved.

This is my favorite Boothism so far - somehow, the right software
will make Booth stop being silly.

Susan

Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: bskendig@netcom.com (Brian Kendig)
Subject: Re: Simon Booth comes out pro-choice
Organization: Starfleet Headquarters: San Francisco
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 18:53:51 GMT

Ted Krueger writes:
>Michael Polen writes:
>>Simon writes:
>>|> Perhaps there are valid reason for abortion, although I'm against it.
>>|> But those reasons must be important, and other options should be examined
>>|> as well.
>>
>>That is all pro-choice advocates are saying.  Thank you for joining.
>
>This is such crap.  Perhaps you feel this way, but the leaders of 
>NOW and NARAL certainly do not.

Oh?  Are they against examining any options other than abortion?

>Please watch next time any state 
>tries to enact things like parental notification or waiting periods 
>which just might have the chance of reducing the numbers of abortions.

Parental notification: If the girl's from a broken home, don't you
think she might have good reason not to tell Daddy?

Waiting periods: This discriminates against people who live far from
an abortion clinic and don't have the money to spend a whole day and
night there.

>"Vote Democrat.  It's easier than getting a job."

"Vote Republican.  We'll make you do things for your own good."

-- 
_/_/_/  Brian Kendig                             Je ne suis fait comme aucun
 _/_/  bskendig@netcom.com                de ceux que j'ai vus; j'ose croire
  _/                            n'etre fait comme aucun de ceux qui existent.
                             Si je ne vaux pas mieux, au moins je suis autre.
                                                                 -- Rousseau
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.abortion