HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: terry@prcrs.prc.com (Terry Cunningham)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: Re: Who buys these things?
Date: 31 Dec 92 14:36:11 GMT
Organization: PRC Realty Systems, McLean, VA

In article <2046@admin.mport.COM>, max@admin.mport.COM (Max) writes:
a diatribe about:
> middle age yuppie scum will cruze up and down melrose with
> really-loud-pipes (tm) on their brand new harleys in some misguided attempt
> at recapuring what cool people did whan they were young in the 50s. 
> 

So why do you give a shit why someone chooses to ride? Or for how long?
Are you the attitude inspector around here?  Do you say who is worthy
enough to be on a bike and who isn't?

If someone buys a bike to pose for a while, and to feel what it's like;
why is that a problem for you?  Some will drop out, some will continue
posing, some will get 'serious'.   Either way they at least got into
the riding, if only for a while.  It's not for everyone, otherwise we would
be up to our assholes in bikes.

As for posing, we all pose to some degree.  It's harmless.

Perhaps you should lightenthefuckup.

Terry


-- 
 | Terry Cunningham terry@rsi.prc.com | "Bed goes up, bed goes down. Bed goes|
 | DoD# 541   'Debunkers of Dogma'    |  up, bed goes down. Bed goes up, bed |
 | Highly Individual Flaming Idiot    |  goes down ......"    H. Simpson     |
From: davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: Re: Harley Golf Cart
Date: 22 Dec 92 14:24:07 GMT
Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY


  I'd rather see HD golf carts than Yammaha or whatever. What's the
problem, the extra volume probably helps amortize the foundry.

-- 
bill davidsen, GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
    Keyboard controller has been disabled, press F1 to continue.
From: ggrevera@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (George Grevera)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: Re: Who buys these things?
Date: 29 Dec 92 17:17:07 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <38172@cbmvax.commodore.com> hartzler@cbmvax.commodore.com (Jerry Hartzler - CATS) writes:
>
>I saw two silver 92' Dyna Customs in the Lanchaster shop the other day.
>Same milage as your FatBoys.  For less than $500 you could have bought
>a brand new Dyna Low Rider!  Get this... one was brought in for a trade-in
>on a new Harley and the other the dealer got from a local Corvette
>dealer who got it on a trade-in!
>
>- Jerry

Do these bikes typically come with warranties?  Is the extended warranty
available?

George
ggrevera@gradient.cis.upenn.edu
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
From: ethomas@bnr.ca ()
Subject: TRIKE FRAME. 
Organization: Bell-Northern Research
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 17:38:38 GMT

I posted this several weeks ago, no response, so I'll try again.
Anyone out there have an idea what the following frame is worth???

	late model Harley trike frame
	Year:	????
		(dual down tubes)

		radical rake >50 deg

		lots of molding work

Please post a response ASAP.

As a gimp rider, I've converted a '75 FLH to a trike by building a
new swing arm to attach to a pre 60's HD Servi-car axle.  Works great
and the bike can be converted back to original in nothing flat!

"Sled"

81 Sport
75 FLH (trike)
From: rfisk@Auspex.COM (Rick Fisk)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: (**** Harley questions ****)
Date: 23 Dec 92 21:28:43 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Santa Clara

I remember about 5 years ago seeing in the Harley Catalogue,
A street version of the 750 "miler" bike. They have since  apparently
stopped making these bikes. I have always wanted one after going to 
see the San Jose Mile about 5 years ago. How hard are these to come
by? And does anyone know what a fair price for them would be. I am
guessing that this is the same bike basically as the "Evil Knevil"(SP?)
750. Except I bet that Evil's bike was an AMF. Also If anyone has a line
on one I'd be really love to hear from you.


Rick Fisk
Auspex Systems, Inc.
rfisk@auspex.com


DISCLAIMER: I said it not them....
From: ggrevera@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (George Grevera)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: Why belt drive?
Date: 24 Dec 92 13:57:09 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

I'd like to clarify my point.  I posted the original question asking why
Harley deemed it necessary to develop belt drive.  The answers I get are
almost invariably, "because it's the best."  And then I ask why aren't
performance modifications (like carbs and cams) either standard or optional
and why aren't any more sportier bikes being offered.  The answers I get
are almost invariably, "because they don't have to because they sell
everything in sight.  So there!"

Now, if they don't need to develop anything new or perform any modifications
because they sell everything, again, why did they develop belt drive?

Someone said that belt drive allowed Harley to pass noise regulations.  If this
is true, what do the Japanese do to their bikes that allows them to NOT have to
develop their own belt drive?

George
ggrevera@gradient.cis.upenn

Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
From: dehahn@strokr.shr.dec.com (chris dehahn)
Subject: Re: exhaust swap
Reply-To: dehahn@strokr.shr.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 12:50:35 GMT

--

In article <72497167418513@oxygen.aps1.anl.gov>, gbanks@oxygen.aps1.anl.gov
(Gregory Banks) writes:

|>Can the exhaust be swapped on a new Harley before the engine has been
|>broken in ? I want to put the 2 into 1 pipes on the bike so I can use
|>bigger
|>bags. One dealer has said not to change the exhaust until the bike has 
|>its first 500 miles, another dealer has said it does not matter, swap
|>it when the bike comes in ! Any input on this?

Our local dealers will swap the stock pipes for HD aftermarket
pipes before you take delivery and still honor the warranty. In
fact, they will modify the motor with SE cams, ignition, carb 
(or an S&S Shorty) and still honor it. Their shop must do the
labor.

CdH

<<<<<<<<<<<<   Ninety eight....don't be late  >>>>>>>>>>>>
Chris deHahn....CdH....Digital Equipment Shrewsbury MA USA
dehahn@shr.dec.com
From: mtrost@convex.com (Matthew Trost)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: Re: Yuppie Harleys, NEW BIKE, rantings
Date: 22 Dec 92 21:31:21 GMT
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <1992Dec21.183259.12221@ryn.mro4.dec.com> dehahn@strokr.shr.dec.com (chris dehahn) writes:

>--

>I guess you can put me down as guilty as charged. I'm one of
>the few who've done a LOT of work on HD's and do not believe
>the Evo hype about it being better engineered than its pre-
>decessors. In some ways it's a better design, in other ways, 
>it is not. If all you ever see of an HD motor is the outside you
>won't see the compromises. For an off the rack stock bike it's
>great. If leaving it completely stock is the goal then by all means
>buy an Evo.

>Much of the Evo's reliability is from improved, modernized
>manufacturing capability, stricter quality control and complete
>change in the working environment and shop floor managment.
>That's not engineering.

>How many r.m.h participants have rebuilt a Harley motor? Bolting
>on chrome doesn't count.

>CdH

Fianally...someone with some experience!
I suspected this, but since I've only done one top end, and some cam and 
lifter work a couple times, I didn't feel I had the experience to go shooting
off with the mouth. (keyboard)

I like shovels a lot. I want a generator bottom, and a shovel top.
I'm not so crazy about pans, but every time I see a knuckle, my p p gets
hard. 8)

But I'd love to be able to afford a evo too. (keep the miles off the shovels)

Matthew

><<<<<<<<<<<<   Ninety eight....don't be late  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>Chris deHahn....CdH....Digital Equipment Shrewsbury MA USA
>dehahn@shr.dec.com
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
From: neal@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Neal Howard)
Subject: Re: EVO peak HP & Torque specs
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 23:13:01 GMT
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <y3r2x+a@rpi.edu> root@june.cmp.rpi.edu (J.R. Ordon) writes:
>Anybody out there have the Peak HP and Torque specs for the
>EVO sporty's?  883 & 1200 if possible.
>And also a spec comparison to a Jap bike, such as the CB750 Nighthawk??

The 1991 models XLH-1200 has 68 horsepower and the XLH-883 has 53. These figures
are pretty accurate but off the top of my head. I have the factory service
manual at a friends house (about 150 miles from where I live) but I am going
there over the Xmas holiday and next week I'll post the exact hp/torque/rpm 
figures. BTW, I had posted them to rec.motorcycles a couple months ago so if
anyone has old archives of r.m, it should be in there somewhere, anyway I'll
post them again after I return from the holidays.

-- 
=============================================================================
Neal Howard   '91 XLH-1200      DoD #686      CompuTrac, Inc (Richardson, TX)
	      doh #0000001200
         "Let us learn to dream, gentlemen, and then perhaps
          we shall learn the truth." -- August Kekule' (1890)
=============================================================================
From: schleige@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Bob Schleiger)
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 02:39:18 GMT
Subject: Re: Why belt drive?
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley


I think the reason HD went to belt drive was because top dogs at HD were
sick and  tired of being  bitched  at about the oil  streak  down  their
female  riders back after lubing that chain!  I had a friend who trashed
his wifes  shirt with his 76  Superglide  on a ride we took and she told
him it was her or the bike.  She was sick of getting oil on her clothes.
He sold the bike!  Is that called  henpecked or what?  I only wish I had
the money to buy that bike back in 79.

Bob   93 FXSTC
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: Re: lane-splitting etiquette (& **** Harley questions ****)
From: Stafford@Vax2.Winona.MSUS.EDU (John Stafford)
Date: 22 Dec 92 13:11:27 -0600
Followup-To: rec.motorcycles.harley
 <1992Dec21.230049.7594@megatek.com> <102961@netnews.upenn.edu>
Distribution: world
Organization: MSUS

In article <102961@netnews.upenn.edu>, ggrevera@gradient.cis.upenn.edu
(George Grevera) wrote:
> 
> 1) Why did Harley deem it important to develop belt drive? 

To lower noise levels.  A pre-belt drive Harley rolling downhill,
in gear but with the engine off would exceed the 1980 standards.
 
> 2) Why do 4 cylinder foreign bikes have 4 carbs but 2 cylinder Harley's have
> one carb (although the XR1000 might have had 2)?

Just to make manufacturing simple and more economical.
 
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
From: ericm@microunity.com (Eric Murray)
Subject: Re: Why belt drive?
Organization: MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 04:01:33 GMT

In article <103198@netnews.upenn.edu> ggrevera@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (George Grevera) writes:
>I'm still confused.  Does this means that water cooling and shaft drive
>together allow foreign bikes to be quieter or is water cooling enough?  Or
>is shaft drive enough?  Were the Sporties without water cooling and belt
>drive (until '93) quiet enough but belt drive was added just for fun?


Water-cooling jackets and shaft (or belt) drives both reduce noise.
New bikes have to meet a federal noise limit of xxDb (I forget the exact
number- 86? 80?).  A bike that has either water-cooling or non-chain
drive can allow a bit more noise to escape from other sources, namely
the exaust.  Therefore, it can have more performance, or a pleasanter
exaust note, or both.

Harley had to do something about noise, since they don't have
water-cooling (for appearance or cost reasons) AND they have small
mufflers.  Harley knew that hanging huge-but-efficient mufflers
on the exaust would kill their sales cause mufflers don't fit the
Harley 'image'.  The only thing left is the chain- replacing it
with a belt or a shaft reduced noise and allowed Harley to keep
their small-but-stylish mufflers.



--
  Eric Murray                                             ericm@microunity.com
      "Archiving the net is like washing toilet paper!"- Leader Kibo
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
From: kgdykes@thinkage.on.ca (Ken Dykes)
Subject: Re: THE doh ROSTER
Organization: Thinkage Ltd.
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 16:11:16 GMT

In article <22991@drutx.ATT.COM> car377@druhi.ATT.COM (RogersC) writes:
>(I had the instructions that explain what doh stands for, but I lost them.) :-(

actually, while you were sleeping i had them recalled.
but you wont recall that though...
        ,gobbler Of turkey -00001

-- 
   - Ken Dykes, Thinkage Ltd., Kitchener, Ontario, Canada    [43.47N 80.52W]
         kgdykes@thinkage.on.ca   postmaster@thinkage.com   thinkage!kgdykes
         harley-request@thinkage.on.ca             kgdykes@math.uwaterloo.ca
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
From: dehahn@strokr.shr.dec.com (chris dehahn)
Subject: Re: THE doh ROSTER
Reply-To: dehahn@strokr.shr.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 16:16:47 GMT

--

|>In article <5337@prcrs.prc.com>, terry@prcrs.prc.com (Terry Cunningham)
|>writes:
|>> 
|>> What's the difference between rec.motorcycles and rec.motorcycles.harley ?
|>

Some of us are really trying to make this a useful newsgroup, with the right
balance of tech talk and noise. I think it is going pretty well so far.

|>However, the general absence of the aforementioned clueless 
|>ones seems to be more than offset by the curmudgeons of the 
|>Evos-Aren't-Real-Harleys-and-Yuppies-Aren't-Real-Riders faction, a group 
|>that seems to have found a home here.  I guess it doesn't matter how you try 
|>to restrict the membership, you'll always get a percentage that can't seem to
|>|>resist putting down someone else's riding choices.

Hey, what ever you ride is fine with me. I have the utmost respect for the
liter jap bikes, they have defined their role and do it exceedingly well. As
for Evos, they are a Harley first and foremost, and a damned good one at
that. If you consider yourself a Yuppie and ride one, at least that put more
dollars into the Harley Davidson Motorcycle and Tee Shirt Company.

Now when the above mentioned Evo RUBbie rider tries to convince me that
AMF Harleys are unreliable junk and the Evo Harley is the second coming of
Allah, that's when I have a Real Big Problem (tm).

Happy New Year

CdH

<<<<<<<<<<<<   Ninety eight....don't be late  >>>>>>>>>>>>
Chris deHahn....CdH....Digital Equipment Shrewsbury MA USA
dehahn@shr.dec.com
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
From: brady_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Brady)
Subject: Re: DoH numbers
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 20:00:10 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Chelmsford, MA

In article <1992Dec18.184418.13772@gecko.uucp> ed@Tekelec.gecko.uucp (Ed Campbell) writes:
>
>     I'm new around here. Can anybody tell me if there is some
>special meaning to the following numbers?
>
>                 13  69
                   ^   ^
                   |   |
                   |   |--Year I was a freshman in High School
                   |------Bad luck number for Anglo-Saxons

>                1 percent
The ratio of useful posts / non-useful posts on the whole Internet

>                   666
Damn, ANOTHER stuck 6 key on the keyboard...

>Ed Campbell

--pete  (oh yes,  8^)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pete Brady                              EMAIL: brady_p@apollo.hp.com (Until 8 Jan 93)
Dirtbag Contractor from Hell(tm)        PHONE: 508-436-5226 (Until 8 Jan 93)

"Biking is not often concerned with logic, statistics or performance figures.
It is usually about as reasoning as love and as logical as art." -- Nick, M'Lud :-)

DoD #5831 -- '92 CBR600F2 (on winter sabbatical :-( )
From: ggrevera@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (George Grevera)
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: Re: Why belt drive?
Date: 29 Dec 92 17:07:17 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <LOTTO.92Dec28172114@laura.harvard.edu> lotto@laura.harvard.edu (Jerry Lotto) writes:
>>>>>> First, grevera@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (George Grevera) asks:
>George> Why did Harley develop belt drive?
>In article <LOTTO.92Dec24163536@laura.harvard.edu> I answer:
>Me> [an assorted list of belt drive advantages]
>>>>>> Then ggrevera@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (George Grevera) explains:
>George> I didn't want to know why you like them or in what ways they
>George> might be superior to chains.  I wanted to know why Harley spent
>George> the time and money on developing them
>
>So why are you asking us?  It sounds like you want information on a
>business decision that was made at the Harley-Davidson Motor Company.
>Harley-Davidson executives come to major events just so you can ask
>them questions like this.  My interest is in the motorcycles, not the
>meeting room.
>
>--
>Jerry Lotto <lotto@lhasa.harvard.edu>         MSFCI, HOGSSC, BCSO, AMA, DoD #18
>Chemistry Dept., Harvard Univ.  "It's my Harley, and I'll ride if I want to..."

Well, it finally seems that you understood my question!  What's wrong with
posting questions about the business decisions of HD?  If you are interested
in Harley's, then you are certainly affected by the business decisions that
the company makes.

I guess I originally posted the question because my brother is constantly
trying to make his '92 Low Rider go faster.  He doesn't care about how clean
or how quiet it is because of belt drive.  He just keeps drooling over carbs,
cams, exhausts, single fire ignitions, dual plug heads, etc.  He loves the
bike and Harley's in general.  He knows that it's not a racer but as he says,
"I'd just like it to have a little more snots."  And it seems that this view
is shared by a number of Harley enthusiasts as I leaf through his copies of
Easyriders, American Iron Magazine, Hot Bike, etc.  Even Cycle World had an
article last year about modified Harley's with pictures of one popping a minor
wheelie!


George
ggrevera@gradient.cis.upenn.edu

Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
From: declrckd@rtsg.mot.com (Dan J. Declerck)
Subject: Re: Yuppie Harleys, NEW BIKE, rantings
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 16:32:00 GMT

In article <mtrost.724779547@convex.convex.com> mtrost@convex.com (Matthew Trost) writes:
>In <37924@cbmvax.commodore.com> hartzler@cbmvax.commodore.com (Jerry Hartzler - CATS) writes:
>
>>In article <1gdj40INNce2@cronkite.Central.Sun.COM> davek@Central.Sun.COM writes:
>>>
>>>What's with all the a*s*o*e* trying to convince everyone 
>>>that they're the only ones cool enough to ride a Harley.
>>>
>>I just try to ignore their rantings.  It's just a vent for their
>>frustration because they can't afford a new bike.  They justify
>>their old bike as being a `real' Harley and generalize in their
>>statement that everyone who can afford a new bike must be a Yuppie.
>
>>To be cool one must apparently have a blue collar and a red neck.
>>What's interesting is that they know how to use a computer, isn't
>>that Yuppie domain?  Now I'm generalizing... I must be as bad as
>>they are.
>
>>- Jerry
>
>Ha! This shit really cracks me up!
>Yes. If I could afford a "new" bike, it would be a softtail custom or a heritageI mean....why tear up my shovelheads if I didn't have to. I would use the evos
>for wear & tear, and the shovels for show & go. Is that yuppie? Is that poser?
>Me don't knows?
>
>Things I'm aware of:
>
>Evos are better engineered, last longer, run cooler, and (for now) cost more.
>Shovels (in my opinion) Look nicer, and are more nostalgic. Just my personal
>opinion. If you don't want to wrench, get a evo. If you don't mind wrenching
>get a shovel before they're all over in Europe!
>
>As far as "knowing how to use a computer".... get real! That's insulting.
>Tell you what though.......I'd rather be wrenching on my shovel, than hacking
>on this keyboard on a Saturday morning!
>
I dunno... my definition of a Yuppie must vary. Most baby-boomers
are the "Minivan" crowd ( IMHO the most scary people on the road).
Maybe the "posers" you guys spout about are Yuppies with a mid-life
crisis?? The most evil aspect of them, is the mentality of buying
a nice bike and PARKING it in one's living room (like I heard a 
few japanese have done with '57 chevy's).

Being "southern" or possibly "down-home" is wildly popular.
Look at 

1) pickup truck sales
2) Country-Western music popularity
3) The part of the country our executive branch is from.
4) the popularity of shows about small towns "Northern Exposure, etc"

When the economy picks up steam, these trends will drop, like a rock.
I estimate the post-industrial revivalism to take it's place.
(Generation X, the post baby-boomers will take it's place).
A good future trend, is the values presented on MTV.

Can anyone speculate as the taste in motorcycling, and
possibly it's popularity??

-Dan



-- 
=> Dan DeClerck                        | EMAIL: declrckd@rtsg.mot.com     <=
=> Motorola Cellular APD               |                                  <=
=>"Friends don't let friends wear neon"| Phone: (708) 632-4596            <=
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: Re: El pan lower ends
From: Stafford@Vax2.Winona.MSUS.EDU (John Stafford)
Date: 29 Dec 92 15:38:19 -0600
Followup-To: rec.motorcycles.harley
Distribution: world
Organization: MSUS

In article <Dec.29.11.47.04.1992.17204@presto.ig.com>, steve@presto.ig.com
(Steve Barnhouse) wrote:

> How come nobody makes reproduction frames????  How hard is it to make
> a frame?  What tools do you need other than a welding machine?

Reproduction frames (as well as custom frames) are commonly available.

The better repop-like frames come from Sweden (I think) and
reputedly cost about $700 but I am not sure the ordinary guy
can import just one.

Kennedy's of CA has good repro frames -- both straightleg and
wishbone style for about $1,200.  I suspect these are the Swedish
frames but I'm not positive.
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: Re: GODDAMMYUPPIEHARLEYSHOPRIPOFFDICKHEADS
From: Stafford@Vax2.Winona.MSUS.EDU (John Stafford)
Date: 22 Dec 92 16:22:24 -0600
Followup-To: rec.motorcycles.harley
Distribution: world
Organization: MSUS

In article <1h812qINNlq3@transfer.stratus.com>,
scol@scottsdale.az.stratus.com (Scott Colbath) wrote:
> 
> I was checking out this new yupster scooter shop (named Surgical Steeds) here  
> in North Scottsdale, Az. the other day and here is what I saw. A later model  
> shovelhead in a Paugho wishbone style rigid frame, FLH front end, lots of  
> goodies, done well. Here's the good part. The sign on the bike read as follows:
> ******************
> 1963 FLH CLASSIC
> $23,500
> ******************
> Yeah right. I don't know how they can pull this one over on someone. The motor  
> has the timing cone vs. the old style generator cover on the right side (I  
> forget the years of the generator shovels). 

If prices continue like this, we will have _yuppies_ stealing bikes.
The price on my scoot just went to $30,000.  US sales only.  There
is one born...
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley
Subject: Re: Harley dealers: complaints
From: Stafford@Vax2.Winona.MSUS.EDU (John Stafford)
Date: 31 Dec 92 08:21:19 -0600
Followup-To: rec.motorcycles.harley
Distribution: world
Organization: MSUS

In article <mtrost.725740439@convex.convex.com>, mtrost@convex.com (Matthew
Trost) wrote:
> 
> 								12/30/92
> 
>   I am compiling  a list of complaints about customer service at Harley
>   dealerships. 

	The secret to a long life: 1) drink only the finest burbon,
	2) never touch the hand of a politician and 3) never, never
	enter an authorized Harley Davidson dealership.
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles.harley