HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: wilker@hopf.math.purdue.edu (Clarence Wilkerson)
Subject: Re: Mitsumi CDROM support
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 16:54:14 GMT

IT does not look like much of a bus to me. It looks pretty much, judging from
the chips involved, like a parallel port cobbled together from 74LSXXX
chips. I think it just decodes a few addresses and passes data on to the
smarts at the drive end. Does anyone have docs on the MSCDEX interface to
low level hardware sys driver for DOS? This might help in dis-assembling
the supplied driver.
-- 
Clarence Wilkerson      \ Bitnet:       wilker%math.purdue.edu@purccvm
Prof. of Math. (topology)\ Internet:    wilker@math.purdue.edu
Dept. of Mathematics      \ messages:   (317) 494-1903, FAX 494-0548
Purdue University,         \ office:    (317) 494-1955 (voice/modem)
W. Lafayette, Indiana 47907 \
From: ianj@citrus.SAC.CA.US ( Ian Justman )
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: GCC typdef gone haywire
Date: 18 Nov 92 23:26:43 GMT
Organization: Citrus Grove Public Access ( 916 ) 381-5822    Sacramento CA.  USA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4

I have a terrible problem with what appears to be a legitimate typedef.
Whenever I try to compile unarj straight out of the box, and I either 
comment out or outright delete it.  Here's the code in the header file
"unarj.h" which is duplicated (almost) entirely in
/usr/include/linux/types.h:

---begin---begin---begin---
typedef unsigned char  uchar;   /*  8 bits or more */
typedef unsigned int   uint;    /* 16 - 32 bits or more */
typedef unsigned short ushort;  /* 16 bits or more */
typedef unsigned long  ulong;   /* 32 bits or more */
---end---end---end---end---

I only keep the first one because it's not defined in the abovementioned
file in the /usr/include/~~~ hierarchy.  Zap the remaining three, and we're
OK, right?  WRONG!!!!!

Here's the offending code it promptly vomits on:

(specifically, a parse error)

---begin---begin---begin---
typedef ulong UCRC;     /* CRC-32 */
---end---end---end---end---

This was extracted from "unarj.h"

THIS LOOKS LIKE (AND IS) A COMPLETELY __LEGITIMATE__ TYPEDEF!!!!!

Excuse me for being slightly blunt, but this means that there's
something seriously wrong with GCC.

Additional notes, the files were extraced from UARJ230.EXE.  I did
get the ball o' wax to compile, but the way I did it was a little
bit out of desparation.  I removed the duplicate typedefs from the
/usr/include/linux/types.h and used the ones in unarj.h, and it
compiled flawlessly.

I shouldn't HAVE to do this; this kind of thing ticks me off and I
hope someone has an explanation.
-- 
Born to void warranties!	ianj@ijpc.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: albinali@cs.columbia.edu (Sabah S. Albinali)
Subject: /usr on different partition
Organization: Columbia University Department of Computer Science
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 14:32:03 GMT


Rather than repartitioning my harddrive and losing any dos apps, I
decided to keep my partitions as is. I've installed the SLS package
except for tex and X. In order to make more space, I moved /usr to a
different partition, and symlinked to it. I've had no problems so far,
except for a permissions problem , which I fixed by chmod uo+rx.
However, I decided to play the ascii tetris as a normal user for the
first time, and I get an error when trying to write scores out. Is
this related to moving /usr? (I fixed all problems such as ownership
of users directories, bug in adduser of switching uid and gid in
/etc/passwd.)

Also, to install X, I'm going to need to move some things to another
partition. Is there anything wrong with that, or some guidline to
follow? (e.g. / on hda8, /usr on hda9, /usr/bin on hda7.) I know that
this may not be optimal, but right now, all I want to do is play with
linux to decide if I want it, then I'll start fresh if I do.

Finally, how do I use my modem? I have no problems writing software to
do this, but (a) I don't want to duplicate effort and (b) I need some
pointers to start.

Thanks a lot.

-sabah

PS If you need to flame for some reason (I hope not!) please mail me,
don't post!
From: torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: VM wizards - verify this please
Date: 19 Nov 92 18:30:29 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki

Arghh.  I really should read the questions a bit more carefully..  My
answer to nr 3 wasn't actually an answer to the question. 

In article <1992Nov19.181645.7977@klaava.Helsinki.FI> torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds) writes:
>In article <5623@krafla.rhi.hi.is> sigurasg@rhi.hi.is (Sigurdur Asgeirsson) writes:
>>
>>3. When swapping out:
>>   All pagetables are searched for in-core pages and those are swapped
>>   out by saving them to disk, decrementing the share count and freeing
>>   if share count == 0.
>>   This result in multiple copies of shared pages in swap, and, on next
>>   reference, in memory, does it not? (and why all the ','?)

Actually, it doesn't result in multiple copies of the same page being
swapped out: shared pages are *not* swapped out at all. 

The algorithm for swapping out a page is:

  (a) is the page clean?

	yes - just forget it and decrement the page counter.  We know we
	can always re-demand-load it (or share it, or just fill it with
	zero's or whatever)

  (b) is the page dirty?

	if it's used by more than 1 process we don't swap it out at all:
	it's too complicated to try to find all the copies of the page
	etc.. 

	if mem_map[] for the page is 1, we swap it out and free the
	page. 

So the result of the above is that shared pages are never written out to
swapspace, although they can be forgotten about (safely) if they are
clean.  Most shared pages are clean anyway (shared pages can be dirty
only after a fork()). 

		Linus
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil (Eric Youngdale)
Subject: Re: Flopticals under Linux??
Keywords: SCSI, Floptical, drivers
Organization: Naval Research Laboratory
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 02:49:36 GMT

In article <!xpq34k@quantum.on.ca> ajedgar@quantum.on.ca (Andrew Edgar) writes:
>The Insite Floptical people want to enforce the Floptical's use as 
>a "floppy" type device instead of a removable Winchester.  In order
>to do this they make the device inaccessible until it is sent a special
>"Hey, I know you're a Floptical and I know what I'm doing" message which
>is: "1a 00 2e 00 2a 00"  (SCSI mode sense, page 2eH, length 2aH).
>
>Eric would have to add this to the Adaptec driver -- if he hasn't already
>(I have the data sheet if you want me to fax it to you).


	It is not as simple as adding something to the Adaptec, since this
would not work for people using the other host adapters.   I could add
something to the upper level code.

	What I need to know is how does this device identify itself at boot
time?  Does it come up as a direct-access device?  Does it come up at all?
This is a scsi device, right?  What is it that you cannot do until you send the
special message?  I guess what I am trying to say is that I can easily send the
message, but I need to know which devices to send it to.  Ideally this would be
done dynamically based upon information that is determined by querying the
various devices on the bus.

	I will send you my fax number once I figure out what it is :-).

-- 
Eric Youngdale
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.unix.bsd
From: erc@unislc.uucp (Ed Carp)
Subject: Re: BSD filesystems? Xenix FS? X11 on hercules screen?
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Distribution: comp
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 19:48:54 GMT

Eric Youngdale (eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil) wrote:

: 	BSD: no.  Xenix: yes, there is a filesystem.  I have toyed with the
: idea of writing a filesystem for linux that would understand a BSD ufs
: filesystem but the differences are so great between the bsd VFS layer and the
: linux VFS layer that it would be easier to hack the minix filesystem to
: understand ufs than to try and port the ufs filesystem.  I have not decided if
: I want to do this or not.

It would be very helpful for those of us who would like to run dual environments
- Linux and 386BSD, booting off one or the other as the need arises.  I've been
planning this for some time now, because I want to do some benchmarking
between Linux and 386BSD.  They both have distinct advantages - Linux is more
of a "hacker's OS", and developments will come at a more rapid pace, but
386BSD is more like SunOS, where most of my living comes from (no one will
pay me for hacking on Linux - yet, but they *do* pay very well for hacking on
SunOS :)).

I'd like to mount my 386BSD drive from Linux (or vice-versa, which is why this
is cross-posted), snarf off the 0.1 distribution (so I won't have to load
386BSD onto floppies, yuck), and then install from a hard drive.
--
Ed Carp			erc@apple.com, erc@saturn.upl.com	801/538-0177

"There is nothing to seek and nothing to find.  You're already enlightened, and
all the words in the world won't give you what you already have.  The wise
seeker, therefore, is concerned with one thing only: to become aware of what
he already is, of the True Self within."  -- Zen maxim
-- 
Ed Carp			erc@apple.com, erc@saturn.upl.com	801/538-0177

"There is nothing to seek and nothing to find.  You're already enlightened, and
all the words in the world won't give you what you already have.  The wise
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jahoward@iastate.edu (Jim)
Subject: Re: SLS and Minicom
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 20:14:26 GMT

In <ToLmuB2w165w@dreaml.wariat.org> jga@dreaml.wariat.org (Jon Anhold N8USK) writes:

>I keep getting a Segmentation Fault (core dumped) when I try to start
>minicom with the -s flag.. Anyone know why? Also, I tried getting pcomm to
>work, but it can't find some file: /lib/libc_v2_11c...

>Any help for a novice? :)

>-j

I am (was) having the same problem.  I couldn't even run it normally,
much less running it to configure.  I saved the config from my
previous install of Linux, but that didn't work either.

I ended up just deleting it.  ( I used it for zmodem transfers though)
So, I got Seyon which I had heard of (it is for X11 though) and would
recomend it to anyone.

This minicom was the one that came with my SLS though, any input on this?

Jim
-- 
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
jahoward@iastate.edu		"If knowledge implies inteligence, then
IEEE / ISU EE			 the knowledge that I am stupid implies
One of the 'Help Room Guys'	 that I am, in fact, intelligent.
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: "William L. Mullica" <p00192@psilink.com>
Subject: TSTUU on Linux?
Organization: Performance Systems Int'l
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:33:38 GMT
X-Mailer: PSILink-DOS (3.3)

Should tstuu from Taylor-UUCP-Gamma1.04 run on Linux? If so what has to 
be tweaked to make it happen?

Thanks,

Bill
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: New questions
From: mdracks@enigma1.COM (Dr. M.Q. Dracks)
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 12:47:55 EST
Organization: Enigma Research Global

I know these might be typical  new-user questions, but I've started reading 
this newsgroup & missed  the FAQ. If replies could be e-mail, that is fine.

1- Where/how can one obtain the whole system if one doesn't have FTP?

2- Is it a full Unix OS [C compiler, libraries, multi-user/tasking, etc]?

3- What kind of drivers for special hardware [e.g. multi-port serial board]
does it have?

Any info appreciated...
Thanks

	-Maxwell

Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: varney@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Bruce Varney)
Subject: Video cards for X
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 19:28:53 GMT


	Where can one find a list of the video cards that have been
successfully used with X?

		Bruce
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: becker@super.org (Donald J. Becker)
Subject: Re: ICMP / IP-header
Organization: IDA Supercomputing Research Center
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:55:27 GMT


The '(char*)(skb+1)' idiom is used all over the place in the net
stuff.  It took me a few second to understand what it was doing when I
wrote my NE2000/3c503 driver, and later I still made the error of
fixing up a compiler warning by doing '(char*) skb+1'.  Now that's a
bitch to track down when everything else is just barely working.

GCC allows zero-length arrays in structures to accomplish the same
goal.  Although this is non-ANSI, I think 'struct sk_buff' should be
changed to use this construct.
-- 
Donald Becker				       becker@super.org
Supercomputing Research Center,  Institute for Defense Analyses
17100 Science Drive, Bowie MD 21114		   301-805-7482
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: amylaar@mcshh.Hanse.DE (Joern Rennecke)
Subject: Problems compiling / installing .98p5
Organization: Point of Presence & MCS Hamburg
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 02:24:46 GMT


Today I wanted to upgrade from 0.98p1 to 0.98p5 to get rid of the accept()
problems. I got the kernel sources from nic.funet.fi , changed the Makefile
to to enable svga-mode selection and select my (german) keyboard.
AFter some time compiling stopped, complaining that there was no way to
make target /usr/include/traditional.h .
As i had no idea where to get it from, i did
  ln -s /dev/null /usr/include/traditional.h .
Compiling then went on fine, with only a few warnings about unused functions
etc.
When i finally rebooted with the new disk, i got lots of initalisation
messages, finally ending with the following:

Partition table ok.
MINIX-fs: unable to read superblock
EXT-fs: unable to read superblock
MSDOS bread failed
Kernel panic: Unable to mount root

rebooting with .98p1 works still fine.

I have the following configuration:

CH-486 Mainboard with 486dx-33, 256KB cache, AMI Bios, 16 MB RAM
210 MB Western Digital AT-bus hard disk
One 1.44 MB 3,5" floppy disk driver as a:

The hard dsik is partitioned as:
hda1: bootable dos partition 11 MB
hda2: minix filesystem, mounted as /
hda3: minix filesystem, mounted as /user
hda4: prepared for minix filesystem with fdisk, but no filesystem yet

hda2-hda4 are almost, but not quite 64 MB.

gcc is gcc222d7, from the gccdisk; libraries ( with jump tables ) & include
files are from the libdisks.

Booting is from floppy disk, no swap installed.

Any clues?

	Joern Rennecke
From: iarit@slate.mines.colorado.edu (ARIT ISMAIL)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: X386mono setup for SLS .98p5...
Date: 22 Nov 92 18:17:24 GMT
Organization: Colorado School of Mines

Hi

I just installed SLS .98p5  with no  problem
on my 486/33 machine with ATI Graphics Ultra pro card
(Gateway 2000). First, thanks to those who prepared this
great system for public domain.

I have no idea how to setup my ATI Graphics Ultra pro card
for X386color. Does anyone did this setup for ATI? I appreciate
if you mail me your Xconfig.

And, I think we are missing something in that README file that
talks about setting up X386mono.

>
>       cd /usr/X386/bin/
>       mv -i X386 X386color            # don't overwrite old one
>       mv X386mono X386
>       cd /usr/X386/lib/X11/
>       mv -i Xconfig Xconfig.color     # don't overwrite old one
>       mv Xconfig.mono Xconfig
>
>Now you just have to edit Xconfig to set the mouse device and type
>"startx"
 If you run 'startx' after this, X doesn't work... 
Don't we have to link (or maybe copy)  X386 to X after this?..
I did
        ln -s X386 X
and it works.. 

Anyway, I really appreciate if someone mails me a Xconfig file
for ATI Graphics Ultra pro card to setup X386color..
Thanks in advance..

iarit@slate.mines.colorado.edu
From: jwiegand@moe.eng.temple.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: uugetty messing up UUCP
Date: 19 Nov 92 01:05:05 GMT
Organization: Temple University EE Dept.

Hey! Has anyone noticed uugetty hanging UUCP after the first xfer?
This started the past patchlevel or so. UUCP transfers 1 file then
times out; seems the serial port is stuck. If I put uugetty to sleep
it finishes normally.

The particulars:
UUCP 1.03 Taylor
Linux xtardis 0.98.pl4-27 11/01/92 i386
Talking to an XT running Waffle, 2400 baud.

jim
jwiegand@moe.eng.temple.edu
This is only a test ...
From: rick@ee.uwm.edu (Rick Miller, Linux Device Registrar)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: tentative release dates?
Date: 20 Nov 1992 12:59:01 GMT
Organization: Just me.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.2.33
Summary: You'll be waiting forever!

c60c-2gf@web-2f.berkeley.edu (David Simpson) writes:
>I was just curious how long it would probably be until the release of
>version .99 of the kernel.  I read somewhere that it could be 2 weeks.
>Is this true?  I would like to stay current with the various Linux
>patches, but if a new version is coming out soon, I could wait.  Thanks
>for any hints on the matter.

You could be waiting a *long* time with an attitude like that, Dave.
A new release or patch comes out about once every couple of weeks, so
you might as well get what's out there now.  :-)

Rick Miller   <rick@ee.uwm.edu> | <rick@discus.mil.wi.us>   Ricxjo Muelisto
Occupation:  Husband, Father, WEPCo. WAN Mgr., Discus Sys0p, and  Linux fan
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: stevez@outboard.med.ge.com (Steve Zanoni 5-4325)
Subject: SLS 0.98.pl5: Should I load it?
Organization: GE Medical Systems, Magnetic Resonance
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 19:42:12 GMT

I've never loaded linux on my system, but I had planned to do this tonight 
using SLS 0.98.pl5 package.  But from the comments I've read so far, I'm 
not sure that's a good idea.  

People seem to be having problems booting because of /dev errors.

So what the story here?  Does this release have problems or not? 

If there are problems, does anyone know a work around? 

I would really like to get linux loaded on my system soon.
--

--
Steve Zanoni
GE Medical Systems
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: zxmsu01@studserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de (Joost Schuur)
Subject: LILO 6 says Illegal version of boot sector
Keywords: LILO boot
Organization: Comp. Center (ZDV) U of Tuebingen, FRG
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 14:42:40 GMT

   A while back (well, a week ago) I succesfuly installed the SLS package
and used LILO 5 to make Linux boot from /dev/hda2 *thrill*. The version
of the kernel was 0.98pl1. This week, I recompiled the kernel twice,
once 0.98pl4 and after that 0.98pl5. I tried using LILO again, however
mixed up some files (map, boot.b, Image) and then even tried using LILO 6.
The bottom line is, my hard disk can't be made bootable at all, the way
I did it a week befoe, even if I use the Image from 0.98pl1. I get
the following error message:

   'Boot Sector is version 4 expecting version 6'

or something along that line. Should I go back to using LILO 5 or does
that have nothing to do with it. Now I'm stuck to booting from floppy 
everytime.


--
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-jschuur@studserv.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
|Joost Schuur, Carl Alexanderweg 3/1 | MUD: Jose@Nightfall 134.2.62.161 4242 |
|7033 Herrenberg, Germany            | Voice: Intl 49 - 7032 / 5761          |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=A still somewhat bewildered user of Linux-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: njs@scifi.uucp (Nicholas J. Simicich)
Subject: Re: SLS update
Organization: Nick Simicich, Peekskill, NY
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 02:17:42 GMT

I ftp'd over to tsx-11 tonight and noted that the i1 and i2 slots were
essentially empty.  Is this on purpose?

-- 
Nick Simicich - uunet!bywater!scifi!njs - njs@watson.ibm.com
SSI #AOWI 3958, HSA 318, NAUI #14065
Join the movement ---  turn 'to bush' into a verb.
From: row@cs.bham.ac.uk (Reuben O Wells)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: looking for useful TCP program
Date: 16 Nov 92 13:24:34 GMT
Organization: School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, UK

Hi all,

I am looking for a couple programs, one which takes a hostname and optionally
a port number, reads data from stdin and the other which runs on the remote
machine writes all data received on a specified port to stdout.

Why ? I don't really want to run NFS and want to be able to do remote
backups, I do have the TCP/IP suite installed and would like to use 
it! For example:

on my local machine ...
tar -cvf / - | senddata <hostname> <port>

on the remote machine ...
recdata <port> > /dev/nrst8

I am sure this must have been done before, if anyone knows of any
such programs please let me know.

Thanks,

Reuben Wells
-- 
row@cs.bham.ac.uk   Tel: (+44) 21 449 9142	      
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: tsuanian@cc.curtin.edu.au
Subject: FAQ please
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 06:23:45 GMT

Could somebody out ther please post me the FAQ to this group,
or at least let me know where I can get it.  Thanks in
advance.

Thanks
Ian.
-- 
 Internet: TSUANIAN@cc.curtin.edu.au
 Bitnet: TSUANIAN%cc.curtin.edu.au@cunyvm.bitnet
 UUCP  : uunet!munnari.oz!cc.curtin.edu.au!TSUANIAN
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: jem@sunSITE.unc.edu (Jonathan Magid)
Subject: Re: WHERE IS THIS (dammed :-) FAQ ???
Keywords: FAQ
Organization: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 21:51:54 GMT

In article <a2baehr.722286807@rzdspc22> a2baehr@rzdspc22.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Martin Baehr) writes:
>Hi,
>
>like as many others I am new to LINUX, and like those others (They were
>to much to count :-), I have problems finding the FAQ. Wouldn't it be
>possible to post the FAQ like: THIS IS THE FAQ OF 'date' ???
>
>I think many of us NewUsers would appreciate that. And there wouldn't 
>be anybody asking for the FAQ anymore.

the problem is that the FAQ is big; real real big. like 150 k.

plus large parts of it are *way* out of date and are in the process
of being re-written.  

So, the main sources of weekly/bi-weekly info which is the meta-faq
which tells where to find the FAQ and how to find out more about
Linux and the info-sheet which tells basic things about linux.

The most recent of all of these docs can be found on sunsite.unc.edu
in /pub/Linx/docs.

jem.

-- 
Jonathan Magid     jem@sunSITE.unc.edu       sunSITE Administrator
Virtual pizza Delivery (tm)::faxed in 30 cycles or less or you get it
----------------------------------------FREE!!!-----------------------
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: rchen@fraser.sfu.ca (Robert Chen)
Subject: TERMCAP! (was Re: Joe won't go)
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:47:27 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.214855.16348@sfu.ca> rchen@fraser.sfu.ca (Rob Chen) writes:
>I was quite anxious when I saw the announcement for joe 1.0.  After
>searching for a bit I found the sources on tsx-11: 
>pub/linux/sources/usr.bin/joe.tar.Z.  I downloaded the sources and 
>compiled (make posix).  It compiles without warning out of the box.
>So far so good.  
>
>However, when I run joe it text mode, all I get is a mess on the
>screen.  It seems as though joe is having trouble positioning the
>cursor for writing to the screen.
>
[...]
>- Ken

[sorry to follow up to my own post]

Okay.  For the hell of it I tried replacing my /etc/termcap with the
one supplied by joe.  I am not in the habbit of getting my system
files from applications, but there is a first for everything.  Anyway,
joe now seems to work fine in both X and text mode.  Also, vi and 
emacs seem no worse for wear.

So the questions is:  WILL THE REAL TERMCAP PLEASE STEP FORWARD.
The termcap that I was using (and that doesn't work with the new
joe) came from HJ's boot/root disk.  Who maintains that linux TERMCAP?
Anyone, anyone?

- Ken
From: gbh@enterprise.ksu.ksu.edu (Da Hubster!!!)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
Subject: Question about IV301doc
Date: 22 Nov 92 00:41:23 GMT
Organization: Kansas State University
NNTP-Posting-Host: enterprise.ksu.ksu.edu



I had a question about this WYSIWYG word processer.

I down loaded it and install it just like in the README file 
and started using it.  Well anyway it would not display the 
text in different font sizes.  I could get the color and other
format things to work but this wouldn't.  Also what is necesary
to have it be able to print to a 24 pin Pansonic KX-P1124 
printer on a parallel port???

Other than that it seems to work great!  
-- 
ADIOS!!!!!!                                            -----------------------
						      |	Da  Hubster!!!        |
                                                      | GBH@MATT.KSU.KSU.EDU  |
                                                       -----------------------