HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pimmel@eagles.cs.wisc.edu (David Pimmel)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: Re: Episode 10/12, or whatever it was called
Date: 14 Oct 92 03:46:23 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison -- Computer Sciences Dept.

In article <13OCT199213314328@juliet.caltech.edu> waynebro@juliet.caltech.edu (Broughton, Wayne Jeremy) writes:
>Wow!  I thought this episode was fascinating for two reasons:  I am
>a mathematics graduate student (I never knew discussing mathematics
>could be so seductive!), and the episode tied in with a lot of threads
>that have been discussed here.
>
>1. First, it was gratifying to see mathematics (and its beauty) presented
>on the show, but I am afraid that the "mathematician" (Amy) was _not_
>convincing.  Number theorists do not study pi or other transcendental numbers,
>per se.  I don't know of anyone who thinks they can get a doctorate by 
>"looking for messages from God" in the decimal expansion of pi (this 
>idea was the final climax of Carl Sagan's book "Contact").  And her list
>of grad school options, "fractal geometry, imaginary numbers, non-linear
>differential equations" was hilarious.  (Gosh, stop griping already! you say).
>One neat thing was the formula shown at the top of Amy's screen at the
>very end: pi = 4*(1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + 1/9 - 1/11 + ....).  Not that 
>she could have possibly been using this to do her calculation.  :-)
>

I thought her character was convincing.  What repectable grad school would 
support someone looking for God in PI.  None I can think of.  That's why
she is off in the Alaskan wilderness and not slaving under some professor
at a university.  He topic of research forces her out of the mainstream 
academic world.  She fits in rather nicely with the folks in Cicely.  I 
hope she sticks around.


-- 

David Pimmel                    
pimmel@cs.wisc.edu            
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
From: tad@ssc.com (Tad Cook)
Subject: Re: John Collum
Organization: very little
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 19:13:22 GMT

In article <rizzoe.274.717888406@FASECON.ECON.NYU.EDU> rizzoe@FASECON.ECON.NYU.EDU (Emily Rizzo) writes:
>
>I'm new to this group so please forgive me if this is a question which 
>has been raised before (and yes I did read the FAQ).
>
>Is John Cullum, the actor who plays Holling Vincoeur, the same one who 
>appeared over 20 years ago in a tv spy series, can't remember the name but 
>he (at least I think it was he) played the Russian sidekick, Illyia 
>Kuriakin (sp), of an American named Napoleon Solo.  It was actually quite a 
>good series, as I recall.  Anyone out there old enough to remember?
>

No, that was David McCallum, an Irish actor, and the show was THE MAN
FROM U.N.C.L.E.  The other actor was Robert Vaughn.

I watched an old Perry Mason from the early 60s the other night.
McCallum was playing a French immigrant accused of murder.



-- 
 Tad Cook     |  Phone:  206-527-4089  (home)     |   MCI Mail: 3288544   
 Seattle, WA  |  Packet: KT7H @ N7DUO.WA.USA.NA   |   3288544@mcimail.com 
              |  Internet: tad@ssc.com           or...sumax!ole!ssc!tad
From: djohnson@cs.ucsd.edu (Darin Johnson)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: Re: Episde 10/12 and other stuff
Date: 14 Oct 92 17:50:28 GMT
Organization: =CSE Dept., U.C. San Diego

(oops, just changed my theories)

>This week there didn't seem to be any general
>theme, just a couple unrelated stories.

Hmm, I thought it relevant that Chris hit the dog because of Rolf and
his loud music.  And Rolf was only there because Maurice wanted to get
a time piece.  And there is mention of the cosmic sequence of events
that could have started because of the coincidence of his hitting the
dog (which really happened because Maurice wanted a a machine that
kept track of the cosmos).

Also, Maurice is in love with a clock, Chris is in love with a girl,
and Rolf is in love with American Indians?  And none of these
are perfect, since the clock loses time; Ed doesn't act Indian
enough (maybe); and the girl is too vindictive to Chris (even if
Chris does need to get over this childish affection for bikes).
So people are in love with something that turns out to be
imperfect - too far fetched?

Anyway, the episode before this, I loved the bit about the basketball
bouncing through the town, and Ed stepping out and saying
"Oh, there you are."  (must be an Indian thing :-)
-- 
Darin Johnson
djohnson@ucsd.edu
    "Only Nixon could go to China"  -- Vulcan proverb
From: gaylin@bacall.ipac.caltech.edu (Gaylin Laughlin)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: New Character
Date: 12 Oct 1992 19:01:42 GMT
Organization: Caltech
NNTP-Posting-Host: bacall.ipac.caltech.edu


Hey Y'all-------
Two episodes have come and gone in this young season, and while the
heated debate over how the midnight sun REALLY works or the details of who's
a BABE and who isn't continues to challenge the thought processes of
some of you, it would be nice to discuss some more interesting threads... 

All summer long, we kept hearing about a new character, a lawyer, played
by Anthony Edwards, who was going to be joining NEXP this season.  He was 
supposed to live in some kind of geodesic dome type of house.  Well, 
does anyone know when he's going to show up?  

It will be really interesting to see what this character is like and how 
he interacts with the others on the show. I personally can't wait to
see him appear.  


Gaylin Laughlin
gaylin@ipac.caltech.edu
From: firenza@wpi.WPI.EDU (Timothy Mark Collins)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: Re: Macs and NEXP revisited
Date: 15 Oct 92 19:33:41 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu

In article <1992Oct15.182617.15267@wam.umd.edu> sorsha@wam.umd.edu (Dreaming) writes:
>
>When Amy says that she's going down to Anchorage(? was it?) to buy
>time on their supercomputer, did anyone else wonder why she didn't
>just dial in from home?  Ah well.  :-)

  Since she was buying the time, it would be faster and cheaper to use the
computer from one of it's terminals.  She'd be limited using the phone lines
and she'd be charged the same rate no matter how she accessed the computer  
Plus, she would not have the graphics capabilities she may need if she was 
calling from one of her Macs, none of which are spectacular mathematical
number-crunchers.

firenza@wpi.wpi.edu
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: Re: Episde 10/12 and other stuff
Date: 16 Oct 92 04:25:29 GMT
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio

In article <1992Oct14.031030.16707@news.columbia.edu> egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy) writes:
>In article <1992Oct14.001819.22566@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>>
>>The clock fixer guy reminded me of "Dieter" from "Saturday Night Live"
>>from a few years back.
>
>But he didn't have a monkey....

Perhaps he had a.....toy monkey???

:-)
Simon
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
From: puckett@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov (Jim Puckett)
Subject: O Episode Namers...Hark!
Organization: NASA/MSFC
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 16:52:11 GMT

O people who know episode names, from what source we mere mortals can
only assume we are barred....8-)

what is the name for the 10-12 Bye-Bye-Hoggie show? It's time to 
label my VCR taper...

thanks,
jim p.
-- 
Jim Puckett    NTI    puckett@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov     
Madison,AL (205)461-4922  
i need to ask myself.....
***********         Would I rather be right, or happy?         ***********
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
From: z8tah@zohar.gsfc.nasa.gov (Theresa A. Held)
Subject: Re: season opener: appendicitis coincidence                          
                  
Reply-To: z8tah@calvin.gsfc.nasa.gov 
Organization: NASA/GSFC NCCS
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 12:56:54 GMT

> 	
> 	By the way, am I the only one who wasn't crazy about this week's
> episode, but loved Northwest Passages?  Just wondering.  It's probably
> just a matter of what different people relate to.
> 
Here Here !!!!

IMHO the cheerleading and tongue dragging on floor dialogue was boring.
I have always had trouble seeing Shelly seriously. 

I've seen a number of posts refering to the scenes with Joel helping Maggie.
I don't see the connection between them.  When she was sick he was being
a doctor.  The mail episode was purely social with a bit of midnight sun
effect.                                                                       
I can't really see any way to make any judgements on the Maggie/Joel          
 connnection based on them.   

I would make more out of the recovery scene from last week than anything 
else.

Personnaly I'd rather not see Maggie and Joel get together.  I think 
the writers could come up with many plots that dealt with alternative 
mates for those two.

I enjoy the show.  I hope they can keep it up.
 
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
From: michaelh@tellabs.com (Michael Hayashida)
Subject: Miscellany
Organization: Tellabs, Lisle, IL
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 13:36:19 GMT


Has anyone out there read "Contact" by Carl Sagan?  This week's episode
shared a _very_ similar subplot with this book.  I don't want to ruin the
book for anyone in case they want to read it (it's good, BTW), so I won't
say what the subplot was, but I was wondering if anyone else thought the
same thing.

Also, has anyone's enjoyment of the series diminished since the birth
of this newsgroup?   I don't know if it's because the episodes have been
weak, or because this newsgroup's unbridled anticipation for the show
inevitably leads to a letdown, but I haven't enjoyed NX as much this
season.

Finally, if you're posting about something in the show that hasn't
happened yet, could you put "spoiler" or something on the subject line
so those of us who aren't peeking don't read it?

Thank you.
Mike Hayashida, michaelh@tellabs.com
From: dascoser@cybernet.cse.fau.edu (david serchay)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: Re: missing kids of Cicely mystery; parakeet?
Keywords: children; dead live birds
Date: 14 Oct 92 18:17:29 GMT
Organization: Cybernet BBS, Boca Raton, Florida

psylum@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu (Jan Hastrup) writes:

> A possible solution to the missing kids of Cicely mystery:
> maybe they're all hanging out at the Village Pizza, which is
> shown in the opening credits -- about where Morty the Moose
> first appears.  Across many episodes the adults have been seen
> inside the Brick, Ruth Ann's store, Joel's office, various 
> people's houses, the church . . .  But what adult would stray 
> inside the Village Pizza if all the kids really _are_ in there.  
> Well, perhaps some day Joel will be called upon for an emergency
> Heimlich maneuver, or Ed will explore the VP with his newly-
> repaired camera, and we'll see if this hypothesis is correct.   
> 
> I thought the "parakeet" in the 10/12 episode was a prop, and a
> poor one at that.  When it was "dead," it looked more real than 
> when it was supposedly alive.  Parakeets do not mildly nod their 
> heads when a strange hand enters their cages.  Okay, maybe that 
> bird was sick and about to drop dead anyways?  But his replacement 
> also sat woodenly on Chris' finger.  Cheap!  (Or is that:  cheep!)  
> Is this an isolated incident or is production maybe getting a
> little sloppy?  Like the poor canoe paddling, it's distracting.

Actually, it was just pineing for the fjords. Beautiful plumeage though. 
:) :)

Dascoser
From: jeffk@dosXX.med.utah.edu (Jeff Knell)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: Re: NX's "Elaine"--Seinfeld's "Naomi"
Date: 8 Oct 92 18:07:17 GMT
Organization: Department of Genetics, University of Utah

PARRY W. JARMAN writes:

   For those of you who keep track of these things, Jessica Lundy, who has played 
   Joel's erstwhile fiance on NX is now in a character part on NBC's 
   Seinfeld.  She plays a girl Jerry is dating--Naomi-who has a laugh like "Elmer 
   Fudd on a juicer."  She has been in two episodes and will be in next week's  
   episode as well.
========================

Bingo, harmonic convergence (or is that harmonica virgins?).

My two favorite shows!  For my funnybone, Seinfeld is the 
most hilarious TV show of all time.  I just about passed out
laughing last night when Kramer flipped the fishing rod; and
the Trivial Pursuit game with the "boy in the bubble" was
beautifully twisted.

If you don't watch Seinfeld, I highly recommend.
And if you missed last night's episode, get a copy
if you can.  It was one of the best.


jeff

feitctaj
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
From: bjz@sei.cmu.edu (Barbara Zayas)
Subject: Re: Sacrilege!  Blasphemy!
Organization: Software Eng. Inst.;Carnegie-Mellon U.; Pittsburgh, PA 15213   _USA_
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 03:52:51 GMT


In article <1992Oct13.135449.16177@zia.aoc.nrao.edu>, lbrother@zia.aoc.nrao.edu (Larry Brothers) writes:
|> But to push a Harley off a cliff?  Sacrilege!  Blasphemy!  When she
|> said, "But you love this.", he should have said, "I love you, too!"
|> and thrown *her* off the cliff.

When Chris killed the dog and the bird, both were
inadvertent, both were accidents.  Amy's method of cleansing
her (possible) resentment towards Chris for these accidents
made absolutely no sense to me.  She *intentionally*
destroyed something that meant so much to him.  Also, it
seemed to me that at the time, Chris wasn't entirely sure if
he really should have been doing what he was helping her to
do.  Seemed that she was doing this and that she sort of
bullied him into it.  Not a good start for a relationship.

Also, what a litter job, huh?

Anyway, the only thing that saved a tiny bit of Amy's
credibility in my eyes was the scene where she was browsing
the Harley catalog.  (Still, she really had no *right* to do
what she did by destroying Chris' property in a punitive way.)








Barbara Zayas			Software Engineering Institute
(bjz@sei.cmu.edu)		(412) 268-6378
From: tim@asylum.sf.ca.us (Timothy G. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: Re: Episde 10/12 and other stuff
Date: 13 Oct 92 12:44:55 GMT
Reply-To: timmi@babyoil.ftp.com
NNTP-Software: PC/TCP NNTP

>is this the first episode where both Maggie and Joel were not present?

It may or may not be the first, but I hope it's not the last!

>who wants to gamble that the "clock fixer" will stay on and make a play
>for shelly?

Actually, I got the impression he was kind of interested in Ed, if
you get my drift.
--
Timothy G. Reynolds					FTP Software
FTP Technical Support					2 High Street
timmi-etc@ftp.com					N. Andover, MA
(508) 685-3600							01845

		"This I say unto you, be not sexist pigs."
				-The Prophetess Morgori

Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
From: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Subject: Re: Number theory
Reply-To: egl1@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Elizabeth G. Levy)
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 03:08:43 GMT

In article <92Oct13.193957edt.55@orasis.vis.toronto.edu> mann@vis.toronto.edu (Richard Anthony Mann) writes:
>A good idea to have a math-girl, but why not some substance rather
>than this pseudo scientific stuff about pi?

'cuz she's linked with Chris, the paragon of pseudo-science?


--
"Moors."  "Moops."  "Moors."  "Moops."  Psssssssssssss.....
From: urgent@elea.umd.edu (Gen)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: Re: Episde 10/12 and other stuff
Date: 15 Oct 92 01:16:35 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland

In article <8226@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> ranck@joesbar.cc.vt.edu (Wm. L. Ranck) writes:
>Simon E. Booth (sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu) wrote:
>: 
>: The clock fixer guy reminded me of "Dieter" from "Saturday Night Live"
>: from a few years back.
>
>Uh, I think that the "Saturday Night Live" sketch was a spoof of a real
>show called "Sprockets" with a real host named Dieter.  I've seen both but
>I can't quite remember when and on what channel "Sprockets" was aired.
>   As far as Rolph and Ed.  Well, I think Rolph just recognized a fellow
>genius-in-the-rough and identified with Ed.  Maybe not.  Rolph seemed to
>be very whimsical.
>   My personal favorite line was Maurice's "I've always admired the German
>people despite their tendency toward jingoistic facism . . . or maybe
>because of it."  Interesting self evaluation.
>
>--
Heck, what's really strange is that I've met Rolph-- well, he had black
hair. There's no such thing (I'm painting with a broad brush here), as
a "little German technocrat in a lab coat" any more. 

What really struck me in this episode were the exchanges 'tween Ed and
Rolph, each one putting preconceptions on each other, not living
up to 'em, and then getting on with bein' friends. Way nice...

cheers
gen
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:05:00 GMT
Subject: Re: Monday's "Midnight Sun" episode.
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp

In alt.tv.northern-exp, hwnunes@leland.Stanford.EDU (Henry Walter Nunes) writes:

> 
> I just want to see what their excuse is going to be to say that Cicely is located in the arctic circle when all along, Cicely apparently had normal day and night periods.
> 
> I'll be watching.
> 	

Well, I have never been to Alaska, but I can tell you that even
if you go only as far north as Jasper Park in B.C., the nights
get very bright in the summer time.  They do not get as
dark as farther south.  So I suspect that in much of Alaska, the
nights stay very very bright indeed, and it will not surprise
me to find out that the sun does not go down.

doug
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
From: larry@b8.b8.ingr.com (Larry Billings)
Subject: Re: Maggie a babe
Organization: Intergraph
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 13:48:39 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.134911.1172@b8.b8.ingr.com>, ratter@b8.b8.ingr.com (Ray Ratte) writes:
> In article <1992Oct10.083058.2068@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>, sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
> > In article <MERRITT.92Oct8135245@macro.bu.edu> merritt@macro.bu.edu (Sean Merritt) writes:
> > >In article <jp.2@usafa.af.mil> jp@usafa.af.mil (J P) writes:
> > >
> > >>   How many you out there think Maggie is a babe?
> > >
> > >I didn't until the long dress in the car commercial.
> > >
> > >Wow!
> > >
> > >I can't even remember the type of car she was selling.
> > >
> > >What long dress in the car  commercial?? The Chevy ad I saw on the
> > nite of 10/3 was a closeup shot of her face, and she was just giving the
> > pitch for the Chevy geo.
> > 
> > My girlfriend keeps her hair short, and I used to tell her to let it grow
> > out, until I really started watching N.Ex. and saw Janine Turner :)
> > 
> > Simon
> 
>  Janine has more than one commercial for Chevy now airing. I have seen 3 so far.

I think she is incorrect in what she says on the Geo commercial---"There is
no beautiful scenery...".  She is all the Scenery I need.

Larry Billings
From: barb@ufycorp.Unify.Com (Barbara Kane)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: Re: continuity lacking
Date: 8 Oct 92 15:55:02 GMT
Organization: /usr/lib/news/organization

In article <revillot-061092091832@mm-mac23.mse.uiuc.edu> revillot@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Judy Tolliver) writes:

>Another thought:  It would have been interesting if Maggie did decide to
>sleep with Joel, which I believe last season was building up to anyway, and
>then just before doing the deed, Joel falls asleep.

I thought of the same plot!  It would have been cute, but....Maggie did
a "Maggie" thing in saying no.  She knew it was the Midnight Sun talking
and not Joel, and she wanted to be wanted.  Evidence sited: her conversation
with Shelly in the traveling salesman's shop.

>
>Am I expecting too much from this show?

I've learned to just trust them.  So far I'm still watching, and still
love it, so they must be doing something right.



Barbara Kane                                             Unify Corporation
* He befriended a lump of wood and took it everywhere with him.  He used *
* to throw dogs for it to fetch and could never understand why it didn't *
* retreive them.      - Jeremy Pascall                                   *
From: waynebro@juliet.caltech.edu (Broughton, Wayne Jeremy)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.northern-exp
Subject: Episode 10/12, or whatever it was called
Date: 13 Oct 1992 13:31 PST
Organization: California Institute of Technology
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: juliet.caltech.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

Wow!  I thought this episode was fascinating for two reasons:  I am
a mathematics graduate student (I never knew discussing mathematics
could be so seductive!), and the episode tied in with a lot of threads
that have been discussed here.

1. First, it was gratifying to see mathematics (and its beauty) presented
on the show, but I am afraid that the "mathematician" (Amy) was _not_
convincing.  Number theorists do not study pi or other transcendental numbers,
per se.  I don't know of anyone who thinks they can get a doctorate by 
"looking for messages from God" in the decimal expansion of pi (this 
idea was the final climax of Carl Sagan's book "Contact").  And her list
of grad school options, "fractal geometry, imaginary numbers, non-linear
differential equations" was hilarious.  (Gosh, stop griping already! you say).
One neat thing was the formula shown at the top of Amy's screen at the
very end: pi = 4*(1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + 1/9 - 1/11 + ....).  Not that 
she could have possibly been using this to do her calculation.  :-)

2. Where was Maggie?  Doubtless too busy making Chevy commercials or
filming with Stallone in Italy at the time.... :-)

3. References to our threads: the Apple computers in full, unabashed
display;  Maurice's racist language (toward Germans this time); Rolf's
comments on that much-lauded Northwest beer ("it tastes like Wasser!");
the bike-tossing.  I never saw the piano-tossing episode, but almost 
feel like I did from the colourful descriptions of it on the net, and
that is certainly what I thought of when I saw the bike sail elegantly
through the air.  I wonder if they intend to clean up the wreckage?
Not very thoughtful of them (esp. Chris) to clutter up that Alaskan 
wilderness!

4. Continuing the morbid joy of nit-picking, I _think_ I saw an editing 
error.  Maybe someone who recorded the episode could check.  When Chris
is in Ruth Ann's store with an ice pack on the back of his neck, Ruth-Ann
goes to the door and turns the sign around so that "Closed" shows on
the outside.  We then cut back to Chris, who walks to the door that 
Ruth-Ann is holding open;  at this point we are seeing the _outside_
of the door, but I think the sign said "Open"!!  Next we cut to a camera
angle from outside, and as they walk away the door definitely shows
"Closed" again.  Can anyone be bothered enough to see if I am full of it?

Keep them equations balanced,

Wayne. 
**********************************************************************

Wayne J. Broughton                 Take the road less travelled by.  
waynebro@juliet.caltech.edu    
Department of Mathematics,
Caltech, Pasadena, CA  91125

Caltech has no idea what my opinions are;  
they think I'm working right now...
From: mhill@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (mhill)
Subject: Re: Episde 10/12 and other stuff
Organization: uiuc
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 21:55:57 GMT


> Well, at least we now know what the German's think of Alaskan Beer.  (What
> kind of beer was it he tried anyway.
> 

I missed the first half.  Is Alaskan beer like what Monty Python says-- 
like making love in a canoe -- f#cking close to water? :-)

> The other thought of mine is about Maurice's further racial slurs.  Is "kraut"
> any less offensive than "jap"?  Or are they on the same level of offensiveness?
> 
> -Wombat's R Us
> 
> 
My mother's an off-the-boat German, I have a degree in German, I work in 
a German dept., and have a lot of German friends.  I've never gotten the
impression that "kraut" is considered as bad as "Jap".  Kraut seems to be
along the lines of Yank, Gerrie, Johnny-Bull and such.  Of course Maurice
 is the "red-neck" (albeit sophisticated one) who calls gays "fairies",
 and they didn't spare us that. 

 OK OK!!! I just asked a real-live German exchange student if he is 
offended and he says no.

The clock guy reminds me of Dieter on Sprockets on Saturday Night Live.

M.A.