HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jreece@sousa.intel.com (John Reece)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: x can't make money
Date: 7 Jan 93 17:57:11 GMT
Reply-To: jreece@sousa.intel.com
Distribution: rec
Organization: Intel - Information Technologies

In article <1993Jan6.170343.6764@cs.ucla.edu>, reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher) writes:

> There's another reason why MALCOLM X isn't a blockbuster, and that
> reason has nothing to do with racism:

The articles I've seen about X's mediocre box office mentioned 
that it isn't even drawing the young urban blacks who've being 
sporting all the "X" paraphenalia the last two years....


-- 
John Reece			"This lifeboat is full"	
Not an Intel spokesman 			 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: anthony@panzer.b17b.ingr.com (Anthony Shipman)
Subject: Re: Akira Kurosawa -- Blind?
Organization: Intergraph
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:59:21 GMT

In article <62010008@hpjsdo.kobe.hp.com>, shinji@hpjsdo.kobe.hp.com (Shinji Teragaito) writes:
|> In rec.arts.movies, eric@ils.nwu.edu (Eric Goldstein) writes:
|> 
|> >  Could anyone tell me anything about the health and physical
|> > condition of Akira Kurosawa?  I recently heard that in his old
|> > age, he has become visually impaired.   Does anyone know if
|> > this is true (or even partially true)? 
|> > 
|> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|> >    Eric Goldstein                         eric@ils.nwu.edu
|> >    Institute for the Learning Sciences
|> >    Northwestern University 
|> >    Evanston, Illinois 60201 
|> 
|>   I think that is NOT true. I've heard he's just making a new film.

I think it IS true. He's having to use co-directors to shoot the scenes because
his eyesight has deteriorated so much.

Anthony
From: lsnow@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Linda Snow)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Al Pacino for Best Actor (Scent of a Woman)
Date: 12 Jan 93 19:57:37 GMT
Reply-To: lsnow@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM (Linda Snow)
Organization: NCR E&M CLEMSON Liberty, SC

>>Pacino should get best actor!
>
>He's certainly overdue, and yes, I think he'll take home the


Sue me if I'm wrong, but I think Pacino has already won at least 
one Oscar.  For either Serpico or The Godfather or both.  So "overdue"
is a bit of a misnomer.
.
.
.
From: shinji@hpjsdo.kobe.hp.com (Shinji Teragaito)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 00:09:27 GMT
Subject: Re: Akira Kurosawa -- Blind?
Organization: HP Asia Pasific Product Operations - Kobe, Japan
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

In rec.arts.movies, eric@ils.nwu.edu (Eric Goldstein) writes:

>  Could anyone tell me anything about the health and physical
> condition of Akira Kurosawa?  I recently heard that in his old
> age, he has become visually impaired.   Does anyone know if
> this is true (or even partially true)? 
> 
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Eric Goldstein                         eric@ils.nwu.edu
>    Institute for the Learning Sciences
>    Northwestern University 
>    Evanston, Illinois 60201 

  I think that is NOT true. I've heard he's just making a new film.

                                        Shinji Teragaito (shinji@kobe.hp.com)
                                             
                                        System Environment Engineering #1
					Asian System Laboratory
                                        Asia Pacific Product Operations
					Yokogawa-Hewlett-Packard, Ltd.
					Kobe, Japan
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: spinaa@rpi.edu (Matt Garretson)
Subject: Re: The Weird List
Summary: very weird
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 23:49:55 GMT

In article <103659@netnews.upenn.edu> hseung@anat3d1.anatomy.upenn.edu (Hyunsuk Seung) writes:
>
>Hey, that' my name!  I didn't realize someone had made a movie of
>myself (I was the one who recommended "Santa Sangre").

Look over your left shoulder, up near the ceiling, and you'll see the camera.
Smile!   
From: dling@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (David Ling)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 16:11:54 GMT
Subject: Re: Movies you were forced to see
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

I've just got into an argument with my wife last night about a video she
wanted me to watch.  She was not satisfied if I was doing a little 
computer work on the side while the movie was running .... she wanted
my FULL ATTENTION watching this with her.

The movie is called SING.

The movie is about a bunch of hollywood actors pretending to be
Brooklyn kids preparing for a talent show.  And some of these kids
are supposed to be real cool because they can dance to disco music
similar to Star Search.  There's top 40's music in this movie.
There's a love angle to this -- bad kid from the wrong side of the
tracks falls for virgin-like girl who is not cool in the beginning
but becomes cool be the end of the movie.  Need I say more.

My wife loves this movie (mostly because of her dance background).
I stomached about 1/2 hour before she turned off the video because
she noticed I was not paying FULL ATTENTION.  

I figure if I'm going to have to watch it tonight if I ever want to
have sex again.
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Coppola's DRACULA
Date: 8 Jan 93 17:44:35 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department

In article <1993Jan8.032459.12219@Princeton.EDU> egnilges@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Edward G. Nilges) writes:
>In article <1ihh4cINNeti@transfer.stratus.com> jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com writes:
>>In article <1993Jan7.144844.16689@Princeton.EDU>  
>>Are you confusing the point of view of a character in the movie
>>with that of the writer/director?  The character was obviously
>>portrayed as a buffoon for saying things like that.
>
>NOT!  The officer was portrayed by Robert Duvall, who played Vito
>Corleone's consiglieri, no buffoon at all; Coppola was thus priming us
>to take the officer character seriously.  

Ah, but you're forgetting that Duvall's first major film role was the
mentally retarded Boo in "To Kill a Mockingbird".  Obviously, what
Coppola was really up to was using Duvall to echo back to that film,
thereby establishing in our minds that Duvall's character in "Apocalypse
Now" was not too bright, but kind to small children.

More seriously, Robert Duvall is an actor, and one, moreover, best known
for being able to play many different and highly varied roles.  We're
not talking about a cultural icon like John Wayne, here.  I believe
Duvall got this part not because Coppola wanted us to compare the
character to Duvall's character in "The Godfather" (conciously or
subconsiously, in Coppola's mind or the audiences'), but simply because
Duvall is a dynamite actor who Coppola liked working with and who Coppola
thought could do the role well.

>Furthermore, he was portrayed
>as a brave and effective officer, who did not flinch at incoming fire.
>The confusion was resident in Coppola's mind, who at one and the same
>time looks at the Duvall officer as beneath his "liberal" outlook AND
>above it (films, any more than dreams, are not subject to a law of
>noncontradiction.)

Many of the officers in the Vietnam War were brave and effective, at
least locally.  By using an officer who clearly can do his job well,
but has also been pretty deranged by the conditions of the war, Coppola
prepares us for Kurtz, a more extreme case of both conditions.  If Duvall's
character is a simple twit who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag
supported by a company of Marines, then the point is totally lost.

-- 
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu
From: cn@otter.hpl.hp.com (Colin Needham)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 07:03:12 GMT
Subject: Re: KEANU REEVES
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies

In article <1iqhglINNj53@manuel.anu.edu.au>, ajg620@huxley.anu.edu.au writes:
>Could anyone please e-mail me a biography of Keanu Reeves?

Filmography sent by e-mail, but in an attempt to stop the usual stream of
duplicate responses, here's a copy from the r.a.movies actors list (available
via anonynous ftp from boulder.colorado.edu in pub/tv+movies/lists):

Act of Vengeance (1986) (TV)
Brotherhood of Justice (1986) (TV)
Flying (1986)
River's Edge (1986)
Under the Influence (1986) (TV)
Young Again (1986) (TV)
Youngblood (1986)
Dangerous Liaisons (1988)
Night Before, The (1988)
Permanent Record (1988)
Prince of Pennsylvania, The (1988)
Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure (1989)
Parenthood (1989)
I Love You to Death (1990)
Tune in Tomorrow... (1990)
Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey (1991)
My Own Private Idaho (1991)
Point Break (1991)
Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992)

Cheers,

Col

-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Now you listen to me, I'm an advertising man not a red herring"
  -- Cary Grant, North by Northwest
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Col Needham                |  Phone: +44 272 799910 x 28704
HP Labs                    |  cn@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Bristol                    |  cn@hplabs.hpl.hp.com
U.K.                       |  100022.1126@compuserve.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: alanj@ibmpcug.co.uk (Alan Jay)
Subject: Re: The Crying Game
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:55:38 GMT

In article <1993Jan1.033300.18100@sfu.ca> semenoff@fraser.sfu.ca (Robert Semenoff) writes:
>>In article <AKNOWLES.92Dec30160137@expert.expert.com> aknowles@expert.expert.com (Anne Knowles) writes:
>>>Has anyone else seen this movie?!? What a great movie and no one is
>>>posting about it. Highly recommended. It was wonderful.
>
>Yes, I have to agree.
>I'm still not quite sure about the state of Jodi ....
>
><spoilers to follow>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>
>Did _everyone_ except Fergus know about Dil ?
>
>Jodi gave no indication that Dil was a man at the beginning obviously to

Not at all Jodi says that the IRA girl was not really his
type.  A comment that can be taken in a number of ways but
at the time implies that he didn't like that type of wowan
but subsequently means he didn't neceserily go for women
period.

>preserve the shock value (when the audience discovers this fact
>later), and the pictures in Dil's room indicate (s)he and Jodi had
>been together for a while. But is there a chance that Jodi was not
>homo- or bi-sexual ?
>Evidence
>Dil screams "she got him with her tits and ass" (refering to the
>IRA-slut's seduction of Jodi)

Isn't that evidence that Jodi was bi-sexual.


A great movie.


-- 
Alan Jay                                    The PC User Group, PO Box 360,
Tel.     081-863 1191   Fax: 081-863 6095   Harrow HA1 4LQ, ENGLAND
Email:   alanj@ibmpcug.CO.UK                Path: ..!uunet!pipex!ibmpcug!alanj
Internet Access via the CONNECT BBS in the UK -- ibmpcug.co.uk (+Std Disclaimer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: bew@brahms.udel.edu (Ben Williams)
Subject: Re: PEEVES at MOVIE THEATERS !
Summary: CINEMA AUTOFOCUS?
Keywords: focus
Organization: University of Delaware
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 02:05:35 GMT


Yes, but what about the cases where the film is only slightly out of focus,
and you may be the only one who seems to notice it.  This happens a lot, and
I can understand that the projectionist, way up there far away in the
projection booth, is not really in a position to bring the film into it's
BEST point of focus.  Considering all these autofocus cameras they have
nowadays, and considering how much money and time and effort the movie makers
put into getting their films technically just right, I would THINK that
someone develope a feedback system whereby the absolutely BEST focus could be
assured automatically...

Ben.

-- 
Ben Williams
bew@brahms.udel.edu

               What we got here is a failure to communicate... 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
Subject: Re: Movies you were forced to see
Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Stuff and Nonsense Division
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 08:03:22 GMT

PRETTY WOMAN: The only thing I can say about this movie is that it's
not worth saying anything about.  I am amazed to think that
intelligent people I know liked it.

WOMEN ON THE VERGE OF A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN: I was very reluctant at
first to see this one because I tend to have a difficult time with
foreign film.  However, I wanted to please my lover (half-Spanish),
and became hooked myself!

BETTY BLUE: the main reason I watched this was because I was with
someone who was just getting over being very angry with me, and I was
reluctant to do anything to pique them more.  So I stayed on to watch
it.  Very powerful.

THE MIGHTY QUINN: See PRETTY WOMAN.

In article <1993Jan5.115053.2470@vixvax.mgi.com> eiswirth@vixvax.mgi.com (Steve Eiswirth) writes:

>	Crossing Delancey - a great movie.  We both loved it and have seen it
>	at least 3 times now.  The main guy (can't think of his name) is a great
>	actor and plays a real man (nice to see in this day of PC).  The other
>	supporting characters are terriffic, especially Amy Irving's mother.

The best thing about this one was the soundtrack, and that wasn't too
great either.  I think it's absolutely one of the most predictable
films I've ever seen, right down to the "well-timed" vignette about
"crossing Delancey."  Gah.

>	Twice in a Lifetime - the acting was very good, but wow, don't see
>	this if you're a guy on a date with a woman you're serious with.
>	This is NOT a date movie.  The message: "Men are pigs."  I was
>	concerned that we would never experience intimacy again after seeing
>	this movie.  I was worried that this would be a downer movie, but
>	reluctantly agreed to go -- big mistake.

Translation: don't watch this movie if you expect to get laid that
night.

-- 
____ Tim Pierce                / 
\  / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu /               Rocks say goodbye.
 \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
From: a0s5108@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Neal and Mara Priestly)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: PEEVES at MOVIE THEATERS !
Date: 11 Jan 1993 08:34:41 -0500
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: titan.ucc.umass.edu




 <1il5b9INN30f@athena.sdsu.edu> dunster@sdsu.edu (mark dunster) writes:
>In article <1993Jan8.213005.1845@Princeton.EDU>, spencer@phoenix.Princeton.EDU 

>(S. Spencer Sun) writes:
>> 
>> >*when the projectionist doesn't have the film focused, sound
>> >adjusted, etc.
>> >
>> 
>> These are things that are all very easily rectified.  Go and tell an
>> employee to tell the projectionist or whoever to fix the problem.
>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> 
>
>Isn't it the bloody projectionist's job to make sure that the film is
>properly focused?  What the hell does he/she do?  Turn a switch and
>fall asleep???

[deletia]

In most cases they go somewhere else and flip another switch.  One
multi-plex, one projectionist.  Then they go back to being an usher
or manager.  Every now and then they change hats and go back up and
check the projectionist end of things instead of the usher end of
things.

But if they can't get the focus right, they should be going to pick up
an unemployment check, or you should be finding another theatre to
patronise whenever film selection allows.




-Neal

Not the spokesman!  Not the spokesman!
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: the year ahead
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Distribution: rec
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 17:32:38 GMT

A few notes on some of the upcoming films Eric Walker mentioned:
In article <1993Jan6.1489.36094@channel1> "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com> writes:
>
>
>WARNER BROS.  
>     Sommersby, starring Richard Gere and Jodie Foster
	Based on the French film "The Return of Martin Guerre".
>     Dennis The Menace - Summer 1993
	Walter Matthau and Joan Plowright as Mr. and Mrs. Wilson.
>     Free Willy
	A boy and his whale.  Some seem to think this will be one of the
	biggest films of 1993.
>     Heaven & Earth, directed by Oliver Stone - Fall/Winter 1993
	Third Vietnam film from Oliver Stone, this time about a Vietnamese
	woman.
>     The Hudsucker Proxy, directed by Sam Raimi
	Are you sure Raimi is directing this?  The script is by the Coen
	brothers, and, the last I'd heard, they were doing it themselves.
	Of course, Raimi is a very close buddy of them, and shares many
	of the same sensibilities, so having him direct isn't implausible.
>
>TRISTAR.  
>     Cliffhanger, starring Sylvester Stallone
	An incredibly expensive film, actually made by Carolco and only
	distributed by TriStar.  The trailer looks very good.

-- 
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: wung@eecom.gatech.edu (Peter Wung)
Subject: Re: REVIEW: Toys
Reply-To: wung@eecom.gatech.edu
Organization: School of EE, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 06:30:23 GMT

Ummm, I thought the tunes were kind of nice.  Especially the opening
Chruistmas tune and the Tori Amos tune.

---
********************************************************************
*Peter Wung			Email:wung@ee.gatech.edu	   * 
*Electric Power Laboratory	Snail mail: 33787 Ga. Tech Station * 
*School of Electrical Engineering	    Atlanta, GA 30332      *
*Georgia Institute of Technology			    	   *
*Atlanta, Georgia						   *
*   	"Pass, Set, CRUSH!"...					   * 
*  	Well, 2 out of 3 ain't bad for a short, fat guy. 	   *
*								   *
********************************************************************

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dtschett@saims.skidmore.edu (donna tschetter)
Subject: Re: PEEVES at MOVIE THEATERS !
Organization: Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs NY
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 18:53:11 GMT

Did you by any chance see "Seinfeld" last nite?

It was hilarious, spoke about seat saving, chatting during previews,
ushers that don't ush, all the things we moviegoers find majorly offensive.

"Who saves the ticket stub" - Costanza

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: TOP TEN MOVIES, as of 23 December 1993
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 93 16:34:32 GMT

In article <ISBELL.93Jan5093438@pop-tarts.ai.mit.edu> isbell@ai.mit.edu (Charles L Isbell) writes:
>mattm@Apple.COM (Matthew Melmon) writes:
>|isbell@ai.mit.edu (Charles L Isbell) writes:
>|>|One might call the film a "White Elephant" if one were a particularly
>|>|masochistic pundit.
>|>Or not.  How much of the cost of the film was donated by Cosby, Oprah,
>|>Jordan, Lee himself, et al?  Wasn't it order 15 million?
>
>|No.  In order to raise additional financing beyond what the studio
>|provided, Lee went to prominent black entertainers.  So, those
>|stars would have provided approximately six million, at most 

My understanding is that practically the entire cost of the film was
financed by the studio, with the completion bond company throwing in
$5-$6 million.  The amount invested by the celebrities Lee called on
was minimal, perhaps a few hundred thousand.  I don't know whether Lee
got commitments from them for more, in the event that the studio and
completion bond company wouldn't come through, but the amount he actually
got wasn't that much.  The studio gave him some extra money, and, when
that ran out, despite some fuss and bother, the completion bond company
eventually agreed to finance the overages.  I'm not sure if Lee forewent 
part of his salary or not.  It wouldn't surprise me if he did.

>|Depending on the financial arrangements
>|payback would not occur until the film returned to the studio
>|what it cost to produce - and for that to happen, it will have to
>|roughly double its cost in gross (so, 66 million) *plus* ten
>|million for promotional expenses (that's probably a low estimate).
>[...]

>|So, until it hauls in 76 million, nobody makes any money (except
>|the theater owners - maybe).

If they had invested in the film, payback would have occurred shortly
after they shipped the order of snowshovels and sleds to hell.  This sort
of deal is notorious for never showing any "profits".  If "Coming To
America" didn't have any "profits", how on earth could "Malcolm X"?

>|It is entirely
>|possible that the overseas market will save them - though I
>|am very skeptical the Japanese will even sniff at it, and Japan
>|is a pretty damn big market.  If, however, it does manage to
>|match the American release for receipts, the film will make
>|perhaps two million in profit, divided amongst the investors.

Remember that part of the money that a film makes that isn't a "profit"
is its distribution fees, the money a studio charges to release a film.
That's a pretty big chunk of cash, generally.  Many films whose bottom 
lines were red have actually brought money into a studio, on this basis.

While "Malcolm X" isn't a big hit, I think it's done well enough to
keep Lee working.  He'll probably have little trouble making films with
budgets along the lines of "Mo' Better Blues" and "Jungle Fever".  The
studios might be a bit reluctant to jump at his next $30 million idea,
though.

-- 
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Upcoming Films
From: <HISJMA@BYUVM.BITNET>
Date: Friday, 8 Jan 1993 14:42:49 MST
 <38156@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu><1993Jan8.145149.17136@midway.uchicago.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Brigham Young University

One of my students told me a couple of days ago that she had seen a preview
for what amounts to a remake of "The Return of Martin Guerre."  Was this
one of the titles on the "upcoming films" list (my student couldn't
remember the title of the film)?  If not, does anyone know anything about
this movie?

I really enjoyed the French film (I have used it in classes, in fact), but
somehow I can't imagine a U.S. Civil War era remake with Richard Gere in the
lead being nearly the film the original was.  Was Gere cast just because of
the similarity in names?  Gimme a break!


--Michael
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: Peter.Norton@launchpad.unc.edu (peter norton)
Subject: Re: The Weird List
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 13:53:26 GMT

Or how about the Australian classic "Bad Taste". A very sick/weird low budget

alien/horror/comedy. And once you've seen a man who's lost the top of his

head to a chainsaw(?) push his brain back in and keep his flapping skull

together with his belt your know what I mean...



---

  Pete with the feet
   The man with the plan

   pn%astro.rl.ac.uk@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk





--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jgraham@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (the End)
Subject: Re: Most Extreme Aspect Ratio?
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 00:48:43 GMT

I dunno, I think "Mad Max" was pretty wide, wasn't it ?

Jim
From: whitehea@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Lady in Red)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Closing credits, specifically Chasers
Date: 10 Jan 93 17:30:05 CST
Organization: Alfaro Vive, Carajo!

In article <16B51262B.MHART00@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>, mason writes:

> Some films have dedications at the end, some list filming locations
> (which I am generalloy curious about), and a rare few have chasers
> (Wayne's World and Lethal Weapon 3 to name a few recent ones). I

> -- mason


Mason,  

What was the chaser at the end of Lethal Weapon 3?  I saw it on
Pay-Per-View and they cut it off at the gaffer's best boy's best
friend's credit. I just got that Mel Gibson bug and I'm dying to know.

thank you,

Amy
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: rsengupt@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Rita E Sengupta)
Subject: Re: Suggestions...
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 23:09:05 GMT

Ahmed,
What about 'The King of Hearts'   ( I think that's the name ).
I saw it twice, both times a LONG time ago.
check it out.
Liquid Sky is NOT funny but kinda weird

rita