HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dabl2@nlm.nih.gov (Don A.B. Lindbergh)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: PRN in VDM has a BUG !!!
Date: 18 Dec 92 14:06:20 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: National Library of Medicine

In article <1992Dec17.224156.4529@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <BzEzrK.6np@tct.com> paul@tct.com (Paul Levin) writes:
>>I am (still) running the GA release of 2.0.  The only printer driver
>>installed (or wanted, for that matter) is IBMNULL.  It is set in raw mode.
>>Try the following commands in a VDM
>>	echo "hello" > prn:
>>			-- this works, the "hello" is sent to the printer queue
>>	copy file prn:
>>			-- this does not work.  The copy command completes
>>			   with no complaints, but nothing goes to the printer
>>			   queue.  Replace prn: with lpt1: and everything
>>			   works fine.
>>Comments, fixes, etc. are welcome (especially from IBM).

In DOS, I think 'prn' is a special name 'prn:' may not be.  I use
'copy file prn' all the time.

>
>The same thing happens in DOS, I think, when you try to use COPY to
>any non-disk device.  Try:
>
>COPY /B file PRN:
>
>Does that do anything?

As an aside:
I've had to use this (except just 'prn' on Novell networks using CAPTURE
where binary data in the 'print' job caused the CAPTURE to end......

--Don Lindbergh
dabl2@lhc.nlm.nih.gov
From: lmp8913@zeus.tamu.edu (PRESTON, LISA M)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Icon Crosshatching color setting?
Date: 15 Dec 1992 18:53 CST
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: zeus.tamu.edu
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    




Hi Folks!

	I reinstalled OS/2+SP after accidentally deleting some system files.:-(
Everything works OK, and all of my desktop customization was preserved, except
that the cross-hatching on the icon of an open folder has changed color-
it formerly was the same color as the Shadow text (blue), but is now black.
This is inconveinent, as the background desktop color is also black-result,
invisible crosshatching.

	The strange thing is, the open shadows _do_ still have the proper color
crosshatching!

	Is there a setting in the font pallate that I've missed, or an *ini
file entry that I could change to change this color to something visible?

Thanx in advance!
LISA

PS
 I was going to report this to IBM Support, but I guess I waited too long.:-(
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: hmeyers@mipos2.intel.com (Harris Meyers)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: NT won't co-exist with OS/2?
Date: 18 Dec 92 22:04:48 GMT
	<1992Dec16.195913.2231@ultb.isc.rit.edu>
	<HMEYERS.92Dec17102138@mipos2.intel.com>
	<1992Dec17.205703.16772@ichips.intel.com>
Organization: ADL Performance Center, INTeL Corporation, Santa Clara, CA

In article <1992Dec17.205703.16772@ichips.intel.com> jburns@pdxgp1 (John Justin Burns Jr.) writes:

!   So what you are saying is that not only will NT not install with the
!   BM present, it won't even run?
!
!   John

Correct, with the October release of NT, NT will not run with Boot
Manager on the disk unless you patch the partation table.  Apparently
NT thinks that a partation type of 0a is a file system it should be
able to understand and then it dies tring to deal with it.


		Harris
		Harris_Meyers@ccm.hf.intel.com

All the usual disclamers apply
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: Andrew Bros <bros@convex.COM>
Subject: Re: XGA-2 Clarification
Originator: bros@neptune.convex.com
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:26:47 GMT
Reply-To: bros@convex.COM (Andrew Bros)
Organization: Convex Computer Corporation, Richardson, TX
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In article <1992Dec18.063416.3786@ultb.isc.rit.edu> jks4675@ritvax.isc.rit.edu writes:
>For those of you who I misled...
>
>The MCA XGA-2 board will cost $399.

  The IBM Direct Catalog lists the XGA-2 Display Adapter for $325.
-- 
Andrew Bros                             bros@convex.com
System Integration Group                Convex Computer Corporation
It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations,
if you live near him.  - JRR Tolkien, The Hobbit.
From: jas8@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Jeff Spirko)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Bernoulli drives and OS/2.
Date: 17 Dec 92 04:23:14 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

This may be old hat, but it's news to me.

I was just messing around with my Bernoulli 44Mb drive, and I noticed as has
everyone else that deals with them that OS/2 will not read Bernoulli disks.
The obvious solution is to shell out $49 for the drivers from IOmega.  I've
been using the dual boot to get at the information I have archived.

Just on a whim, I tried to format a Bernoulli under OS/2.  What happened you
ask?  The disk was formatted.
I copied information to the disk, and turned off the computer, and the
information was there intact when I turned it back on.

Then, I booted with DOS and tried to read the disk.  This resulted in errors
similar to those OS/2 gave when trying to read the old disks.

Conclusion:
   Bernoullis formatted under DOS can only be read in DOS or in OS/2 with
   drivers.
   Bernoullis can be formatted and used under OS/2 without drivers, but they
   will be unusable in DOS.

My question:
   Can anybody confirm/explain this?  I'm assuming that it's because OS/2
   doesn't know how to deal with the standard Bernoulli file system.

Please mail comments, I'll post a conclusion if necessary.

-- 
    ********************************
    *    Jeff Spirko               *   Running OS/2 2.0 without problems.
    *    JAS8@LEHIGH.EDU           *
    *        @NS1.CC.LEHIGH.EDU    *   Tiny-squishy's Winbloz is gone.
    *        @PL122D.CC.LEHIGH.EDU *
    ********************************
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: gordon@galisant.demon.co.uk (Gordon Beck)
ReplyTo: gordon@galisant.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Installation help needed. (Error c000005)
Distribution: world
X-Mailer: cppnews $Revision: 1.19 $
Organization: Galisant Ltd
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 19:44:33 +0000


In article <1992Dec12.085848.11093@tc.cornell.edu> chow@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Christopher Chow) writes:

>
> A couple of months ago I got OS/2 (as part of the summer promo upgrade
> from Windows), but since I had limited disk space, I deinstalled it
> after making sure that OS/2 runs on my system. I haven't got the  October
> Service pack, so all I have is the version that existed in July this
> year.
>
> Over the last two days, I've attempted to install OS/2 a number of
> times without sucess. I'm using the boot manager, and have tried
> installing on both my hard drives, and while the installation itself
> seemed to go smoothly (OS/2 accepted all 15 disks plus the first
> printer driver disk), upon rebooting at the end of the install process,
> I get the OS/2 logo, and then after some disk activity, a screen which
> has the code "c0000005" on the upper left hand corner. The rest of the
> screen is blank.
>
> In the ensuing months, the only difference in my system was that I added
> an Iomega Insider 250 tape drive with its fast floppy controller card, and
> a Diamond Speedstar 24X. Is there something special I need to do in the
> installation process to get the system up with the Speedstar 24X? What
> does the "c0000005" code mean?
>
> For reference, my h/w config is the following: 486-33 clone, AMI bios,
> 8 Mb ram, Speedstar 24X, Soundblaster Pro (irq=5), Iomega fast floopy
> controler (for tape driver, irq=3), two Maxtor 7213A drives. I've tried
> installing (twice each) to a primary partition on drive 1 and also to an
> extended partition on drive 2. Both cases the target partition was formatted
> for HPFS.
>

There is a replace BVHSVGA.DLL driver that you need for what must be a Western
Digital chip-set on the video card.


Gordon Beck     | gordon@galisant.demon.co.uk   |
Galisant Ltd    |                               |
Durham UK       |                               |The Questing Beast
From: ericwolf@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Eric Wolf)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Floppy problem (UPDATE!)
Date: 15 Dec 92 21:50:24 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

Here's an update to my previous floppy problem...

As the original story went, I could not read disks under my DOS
5.0 partition (general failure reading drive A:, my 3.5" 1.44MB
drive).  If I had any disk that was formatted under OS/2 2.0
(+SP and 32GRE) or DOS (MSDOS 5.0), it could not be read under
my DOS 5.0 partition (OS/2 Dos 5.0 session worked fine and read
it though).  However, disks formatted under the DOS partition
could be read by OS/2 and disks formatted by OS/2 could be read
by OS/2, as well.  Disks simply could not be read by the DOS 5.0
partition (either formatted by OS/2 or DOS).

Now, the update. . . 

A new discovery has since been made.  Disks are still readable
and writeable under OS/2 (no problems detected so far), as
always, but they can be made readable under the DOS 5.0
partition if the write protect tab is set (so they are write
protected.)  So everytime I need to read a disk, I have to set
the write protect tab and the disk is readable under the DOS
partition.  If I don't, the disk is unreadable and the disk is
then corrupted so nothing else can read it, either.

I can also read a disk once with the write protect tab, take off
write protect and try and do a DIR and it is unreadable. 
Putting the tab back on still sends a general failure.

I have also tried to redo the system on my C: (DOS) partition by
formatting a floppy with the system (format /s) and copying the
SYS.COM to it, setting the write protect tab (so it can be
read!!!) and then booting from it and doing a SYS C: from drive
A:.  So, I have a clean system on there but it still does it! 
ARRRRGGGGHHHHHHH!

IMHO, this is really weird!  If anybody could provide any clue,
lead or path to follow to try to help resolve this problem, I
would really appreciate it.  Thanks!

- Eric
From: Raju.Daryanani@p309.f1.n700.z6.fidonet.org (Raju Daryanani)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Where is GCC 2.2.2 (FAT),Good books on OS/2, screen fonts too small
Date: 20 Dec 1992 13:29:01 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


Can someone tell me where I can find the FAT version of GCC 2.2.2 for ftp?  
I know this question has been asked recently, but I didn't save the replies 
and I don't have access to ftp myself to be able to search for it.

Also, what are some good books on OS/2 2.0, both for running/configuring 
and programming (REXX, C, PM, etc.)?  I've got Iacobucci's book, bought 
several years ago, but that was written for version 1.0 and contains such 
gems as "The  size of a PC DOS partition is limited to 32MB ... OS/2 has 
the same limitation". :-)

Another problem is that I've installed ET4000 drivers with a resolution 
of 800x600, but the fonts used in DOS windows are now too small to 
read comfortably.  The system is already using the largest font shown in 
the window menu font option.  Is there a way to make it larger?

Raju 
--- msgedsq 2.1
 * Origin: Raju's Point (6:700/1.309)
SEEN-BY: 700/1 5 74 101 232 275 1066/300 309
--  
uucp: uunet!m2xenix!puddle!6!700!1.309!Raju.Daryanani
Internet: Raju.Daryanani@p309.f1.n700.z6.fidonet.org
From: dbhlve@acpub.duke.edu (Robert Newlin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Win 3.1 for OS/2 will >not< release this month
Date: 12 Dec 92 23:23:54 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

I was at one of IBM's roadshows this week.  They said that the version
that includes Windows 3.1 support will be OS/2 2.1 and is scheduled to
ship in February.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: g1nickut@cdf.toronto.edu (Nick Zahariadis)
Subject: Re: OS/2 NOT 32 Bit?
Organization: University of Toronto Computing Disciplines Facility
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:01:08 GMT

In article <1grrosINNo3@newsgate.cs.pdx.edu> ericb@ursula.ee.pdx.edu (FurryLogic) writes:
>lotozo@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (William A Lotozo) writes:
>>I have heard some people claim that OS/2 is not a 32 bit operating system
>>but actually a 16 bit os running a 32 bit os emulation.  Is this so? 
>>I thought that if anything it was a true 32 bit os with a 16 bit emulation
>>for backwards compatability to os/2 1.x programs.
>
>   No. But I'd really like to hear more abour this 32-bit OS emulation
>these 'some people' talk about. :-)

 Just as a followup here to this thread; OS/2 is indeed a 32-bit OS.
 Certain parts of it *were* 16-bit, i.e. GRE, etc. and some parts of the
 HPFS still are. This is bound to change though to 32-bit. I think.
 Corrections are always welcome, though.

 OS/2 is NOT a 16-bit os, emulating a 32-bit one, at all! But it does
 deal with programs that run in 16-bit mode. OS/2 comes with *thunks*,
 which convert any 16-bit requests to 32-bit ones and vice versa, for
 programs that need this kind of support. Just beginning to imagine the
 gymnastics required to achieve that is - yes you've guessed it - one
 hell of a story.

 Nick.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Always put off until tomorrow what you are sure 
 to mess up beyond repair today."
Nick Zahariadis    e-mail: g1nickut@cdf.utoronto.ca
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: QMS 1700 printer driver
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:52:06 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.134548.12930@tom.rz.uni-passau.de> schaefer@kirk.fmi.uni-passau.de (Achim Schaefer) writes:
>Yes, it is a Postscript device. But the printer has 600 dpi.
>More I don`t know about ther printer, because it is not my 
>printer. It is one of the University.

If you look carefully there's a so-called generic Postscript printer
driver.  Try that one.  (Postscript, unlike other printing
technologies, will scale up nicely and take advantage of the extra
dots your printer provides.)

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Subject: Re: 32-bit Trident drivers hang my system!
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 09:20:35 GMT

In article <1992Dec10.234954.27877@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
> In article <8056@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
> >I'm trying to get my 512K Trident 9000 to run with the 32-bit drivers recently
> >posted to ftp-os2. I followed the recently-posted directions, but when I
> >reboot, the system hangs with a black screen with the cursor in the upper left
> >corner. I'm trying to run in 800x600x256 mode. Any ideas? I've checked, and
> >all of the files from the driver distribution are there except for VSVGA.SYS,
> >and there is a SVGADATA.PMI file in C:\; there're also the appropriate lines
> >for SVGA support in CONFIG.SYS.
> 
> Jay, the Trident 8900C adapter requires the full megabyte for 800x600
> 256 color support.  I'm not sure about the 9000, but it may be
> similar.
> 
> The proof would be to check whether the 640x480 256 color driver
> works.

Your SVGADATA.PMI file also needs to be in the C:\OS2 directory....NOT the C:\
directory you mention above.
 
Steve
-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | On Sept. 19th, 88% of NZ voters opted
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         | for proportional representation. It
withers_s@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz            | looks like we may get a more  
**** Happy user of OS/2 v2!! ****       | democratic system "real soon now".
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: Why not standard VESA drivers??
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 04:47:57 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.025804.2367@sbcs.sunysb.edu> kskapin@csws3.ic.sunysb.edu (Keith T Skapinski) writes:
>Why doesn't IBM (or someone else) supply VESA drivers for 800x600x16, 
>800x600x256, 1024x768x16, and 1024x768x256?
>I'm sure it can be done and it would work with any SVGA cards which are
>VESA compatible (like my Trident). I have a DOS GIF viewer called VUIMG and
>it includes specific drivers for many SVGA cards as well as a generic VESA
>driver which can be used with any SVGA card which is VESA compatible. The
>VESA card works great with my Trident as well as many other cards.
>Thats what I want for Christmas!

VESA is a real mode "standard."  It has basically nothing to do with
protected mode operating systems.

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637       | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Subject: Re: Mix of 3-chip and 9-chip simms with OS/2
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 21:11:59 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.053810.4347@umr.edu> jdickins@mcs213i.cs.umr.edu (James Dickinson) writes:
> > 
> >Mixing RAM has always been a no-no. The consequences may be unacceptable to
> >you.....but the solution is pretty clear. BTW.....now is the time to re-sell
> >your 4 meg of odd RAM (whichever 4 you choose) because the US duty fight with
> >the Koreans has pushed the price of RAM up a bit.....you should be able to
> >recover most of the cost of the 4 new Megs.
> >
> I have been using 70 nsec 1MB simms and 60 nsec 4MB simms ( 20 MB total )
> for 4 months now without any problems whatsoever.     
> 
> Jim

Like I said....you try it and if you get away with it.....fine. If not,
problems can be resolved by making your RAM uniform.
 
You're a lucky guy!
 
Steve

-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | On Sept. 19th, 88% of NZ voters opted
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         | for proportional representation. It
+64 4 478 4714                          | looks like we may get a more  
**** Happy user of OS/2 v2!! ****       | democratic system "real soon now".
From: harvey@waikato.ac.nz
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Another OS/2 Bug?
Date: 17 Dec 92 13:44:51 +1300
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

This bug(?) may have been noticed already but I'll post it any way

3 drives all HPFS
Delete stuff unremmed in autoexec.bat and config.sys
directories full with deleted stuff (not sure if this is necessary)
using XTGOLD 2.5 select a directory type alt P (for prune) type PRUNE
Trap 000D everytime.

This does not happen with FAT disks and not with del directories remmed out

Anyone care to comment?

Mark Harvey
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: ghenniga@NMSU.Edu
Subject: Farenheit 1280 Drivers..FINALLY!
Reply-To: ghenniga@NMSU.Edu
Organization: NMSU Computer Science
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 01:41:40 GMT


	Well they're finally here! I just uploaded the Orchid
Farenheit 1280 drivers to ftp-os2.NMSU.Edu (128.123.35.151) in the
file pub/uploads/f1280.zip. They've even included an 800x600 driver in
this bunch!
	Haven't tried 'em myself yet, just downloaded them from the
Orchid BBS and uploaded 'em straight to the net...What a nice guy!:):)

Have Fun!
Gary Hennigan
---------
PhD Student, Computational Electromagnetics
New Mexico State University
email: ghenniga@NMSU.Edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jst50986@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jack S. Tan)
Subject: Re: Screen savers
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:17:22 GMT

chalekcl@crd.ge.com (Carl Chalek) writes:

>Are there any PD screen savers for OS/2?  Apparently there aren't any included
>with it.

You can use the Lockup feature of OS/2 as a screen saver.  The selected
bitmap (or default) will come up for a few minutes, then the screen will
blank with a Help button and a floating lock as indicators of a running
system.

-- 

Jack Tan                                     Sattinger's Law:
jahk@uiuc.edu                       It works better if you plug it in.

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: g1nickut@cdf.toronto.edu (Nick Zahariadis)
Subject: Re: Are PS/2 floppy drives better under OS/2?
Organization: University of Toronto Computing Disciplines Facility
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 07:11:44 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.221015.12402@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <1992Dec8.012642.29068@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> rjones@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Ronald Jones) writes:
>>What is different about the PS/2 floppy (controller)? I'm convinced
 [stuff deleted]

>The floppy hardware on most PS/2s is indeed redesigned.  I think the
>DMA works better, perhaps because of the Microchannel assist.  (I seem
>to remember some minor mention of this when the PS/2 first came out.)

 I also saw this in an IBM technical journal a couple of months ago.
 AT PC users that convert to MCA PS/2 will notice a dramatic performance
 improvement on their floppy disk operations, anything from formatting, to
 DMA transfers etc. 

>Rumor has it that the next group of PS/2s will have OS/2-aware (and
>controlled) autoejecting 2.88 MB floppy drives.  There will still be
>manual eject button.  Just thought I'd throw in a little tidbit here.

 Now that - that would be extremely cool.

 Nick.


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Always put off until tomorrow what you are sure 
 to mess up beyond repair today."
Nick Zahariadis    e-mail: g1nickut@cdf.utoronto.ca
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Help ! Problem with Tseng video card and CSD.
Date: 12 Dec 92 01:50:47 GMT
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange

In article <1992Dec7.151224.21211@rtf.bt.co.uk> traub@rtf.bt.co.uk (Michael Traub) writes:
> In article <1992Dec3.054702.6284@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry) writes:
> >	I've just got a clone Tseng et400 card, and after installing the CSD,
> >when I try to install the video drivers, or even just type "svga on" in a
> >full screen dos-box, it gives me the message :
> >
> >SVGA: PMI File Generator (v1.01)
> >Error generating file: requires VESA-compliant BIOS
>  
> I noticed this on a friend's machine. Oddly enough his machine has
> *exactly* the same graphics card as mine (Orchid Prodesigner IIs, even the
> bios matches) yet mine runs the new version of svga.exe without a hitch.
> We ran the old version of svga.exe on his machine and that worked ok
> but the selective install only gave us 640x480x256 as an option and
> when we selected this it didn't work, the system booted up and then
> gave a blank screen with a cursor rather than the WPS.
> 
> Can anyone help?

If you check the Utilities disks with these cards, you may find a program
called TLIVESA.COM. It is a DOS tsr that makes your card fully VESA compliant.
Unfortunately, it isn't terribly useful. 
 
My TSENG has been ordered out of my machine and is now looking for a new home.
My Trident and I are very happy together. 
 
I hate fussy video cards.
 
Steve

-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | On Sept. 19th, 88% of NZ voters opted
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         | for proportional representation. It
withers_s@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz            | looks like we may get a more  
**** Happy user of OS/2 v2!! ****       | democratic system "real soon now".
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc