HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: system@micromed.com (Duane Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: Installing Coherent 4.0.1A, and at wit's end...
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 92 09:36:11 PST
Organization: Micro-Medic BBS - +1 408 279 5240 - Public Access

whedon@netcom.com (Bill Whedon) writes:
> >Except that MWC themselves, in the manual, refer to it as a 
> >"subliminal message".
> >
> AAAAAAACK!!!  RTFM Fever Strikes Again!  Boy!  Is _my_ face red, or what?!
> Bill "RTFM" Whedon (blush...)

Happens to the best of us....


--- 
system@micromed.com (Duane Davis)                   voice (408)293-3299
Micro-Medic                          public access usenet (408)279-5240
711 Lincoln Avenue                  public access pcboard (408)280-1610
San Jose, CA 95126                    FileServer - FTPMail@micromed.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
From: raba@zebis.BR.Schule.DE (Ralph Ballier)
Subject: Re: Pascal and Coherent
Organization: ZeBIS Berlin, Germany
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1992 17:01:56 GMT

styer@ms.uky.edu (Eugene F. Styer) writes:
: I am teaching at an university where we are using a unix system for teaching
: students pascal.  Anyway, we teach some extension classes in area towns that
: currently have PC's an no convient access to our department system.  The
: students will be coming here for any upper level classes they might want, and
: so we're not sure we want them to use Turbo Pascal (or equivalent) and then
: have to learn an entirely new system when they get here.  So my request is:
: Can a Pascal compiilier be purchased for Coherent, and what type of price
: would we be talking?
: -- 
: Eugene Styer - 402 Wallace, EKU, Richmond, KY 40475  matstyer@eku.bitnet
: "There was a boy named Eustace Clarence Scrubb, and he almost deserved it."

Hi, we are a group of interested teachers; please answer us if you got any answers to your request concerning pascal & coherent.
From: shendrix@PCS.CNU.EDU ("", Shannon Hendrix)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: Are we dead??
Date: 14 Nov 92 04:57:37 GMT
Reply-To: "Coherent operating system" <COHERENT@indycms.bitnet>

>
> Are there no users of COHERENT out there?? I bought COHERENT 3.2.1A
> (I really let commercials convince me sometimes) in hope to learn more
> about UNIX, and perhaps create some great software with/for it. The
> funny thing is, that I feel quite alone around here, with noone ever
> posting anything for this group (That's not true, but almost).
> Why don't we discuss programming, projects (as perhaps a simple X10
> server) and things like that?? I also read the MINIX news, and they
> have a lot of nice discussions going on, and sometimes there are some
> source code postings. Why not the same here (isn't this comp.os ?)?
>
> What I said about the X10 server is not a joke, I think it would be
> possible even with a 286 and a mono graphics card. Anyone interested?
>
>
 +------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
> |  di1helol@caligula.his.se    | "I`m no communist, but I'd sure like to be"
 |
> | All replies in email please! |                 Marlon Brando
 |
>
 +------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
>

	I almost hate to say this but download Linux.  In comparison with
Coherent, it is faster, more compatible, has X11R5, GNU everything, F77,
TeX, and is more reliable (at least on my machine).  I had loads of
problems with Coherent 3 and 4 and decided to can it until MWC ships the
next upgrade.  If it just had tape support and a nice C compiler, things
would be great.
	I plan to keep Coherent and keep up with its progress.  Its just
that I had some projects to complete and I had no choice but find another
OS since Coherent wouldn't hack it.  MWC is doing a pretty good job but
Linux has killer support because so many people are using it.  I get
10-15 messages per day from the Linux mailing list.
	I believe a lot of the reason for Coherent traffic dying down is
that many Coherent users are switching to Linux and 386BSD.  MWC needs to
get some stuff out the door quick before too much longer.
	So much going for Coherent, but the window of opportunity is fast
closing.  Cheap professional software (like dBman) could save it if they
get the upgrade out.
	Anyway, I am not trying to sell you on Linux.  Just really
offering a possible (and likely) explanation of the drop in Coherent
discussion around here.  Coherent is nice and has paid for itself in
what I learned about UNIX from it.  Now, I am looking at UNIX with
full source code and more involvment with its development so I guess
this is just a step up for my learning.



=====================================================
Shannon Hendrix                |shendrix@pcs.cnu.edu
Christopher Newport University |---------------------
Newport News, VA               |** space for rent **
=====================================================
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
From: jle9162@zeus.tamu.edu (ECKHARDT, JASON LEE)
Subject: Re: GCC
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 01:12:00 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.195413.27482@sequent.com>, patbob@sequent.com (Patrick White) writes...
>In article <9211110010.07@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>In article <BxI9K5.sM@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> rasumner@zeno23.math.UWaterloo.ca (Reuben Sumner) writes:
>>>Where can the MWC port of GCC 2.2.2 be found? My understanding of the GPL
>>
>>MWC hasn't released it yet.  MWC has been known in the past for their expertise
>>in writing C compilers.  They have a whole suite of tools for debugging
>>output from compilers, and they won't release GCC until it passes to their 
>>satisfaction.
> 
>	Register my congrats on adhering to that attitude.. if they ever give
>up on it, their products will never be as good of quality.
> 
>>They may require GCC to compile the OS sources before they release it.
> 
>	I've heard that's a pretty good test of a compiler.. especially since
>there appear to be no comprehensive test suites.  Its an expensive test to
>grade though (you only notice when the OS behaves strangely).
> 
>>Also, porting of GCC may coincide with the addition of floating point
>>hardware support for Coherent 4.1.
> 
>	The two together would be well worth the wait.
> 
> 
>-- 
>Pat White (patbob@sequent.com, work: (503) 578-3463)

 I'm not sure why everyone can't already be running gcc 2.2? If coh 4.0
really is binary compatible with SCO, why not just get the sco binaries and
run them until MWC gets theirs finished? I don't have 4.0 yet (just 3.2)
so I can't say about the validity of the 'binary compatibility' of 4.0.
But gcc 2.2 is totally text oriented and should not use anything coh.
can't handle if its truly binary comat.

Has anyone even tried? The sco binaries are available from:
ftp.wimsey.bc.ca   in /pub/wimseypd.

thanks, jason.

Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
From: root@rgm.com (Ray Mendonsa)
Subject: Re: 4.0 suggestions
Organization: RGM *nix - Sacramento, CA
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 17:36:09 GMT

gerald@CSOFT.UUCP (Gerald Abshez) writes:

>In a related vein, does anyone know if COPS or CRACK has made it
>over to the COH side? How about CRASHME? 

I tried running Crack.  Turns out it expects passwd files to be in a different
(more standard) format.  I modified my passwd file by adding colons to get
the fields aligned.  I ran the program (executed for a few days), but it didn't
turn up any passwords.  Not even for a dummy account who's password was in
the dictionary. . .

Perhaps this is one of Coherents greatest security achievements!!  It's almost
invulnerable to Crack! 8^D
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------->
Ray Mendonsa ---- root@rgm.com ---- Admin., rgm.com --------->
916/923-5013 8n1,HST -- login: new -- Public access Usenet -->
"I've voted and I can't get up!"
From: magus@drktowr.chi.il.us (Louis Giliberto)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Ghostscript
Summary: another goodie
Keywords: goodie ghostscript printers
Date: 11 Nov 92 09:51:42 GMT
Organization: DarkTower Software
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

I've been playing with Ghostscript for MS-DOS and windows, and it's
pretty handy.  It would be a good port for Coh since there is already
epson(tm) and laser support.  It's not as slow as it might seem (at
least on a 16Mhz sx).  

I was wondering how hard it might be to port, and if it might be
better to wait for gcc to be ported. 

For those that don't know what ghostscript is, it's a PostScript(tm)
emulator for those of us who are willing to trade the time to save
some $$'s, or, in my case, just have dot matrix (no lasers here, boo-hoo).

It'll even print to screen or .pcx or other files, besides the printer,
and the color ps stuff looks cool in VGA.

Anyhow, if anyone wants to take a look and see what they think,
the source is at prep.ai.mit.edu in the GNU section.

Just thinking out loud...

-Louis

--
---------------------------------------------------------
 Louis J. Giliberto, Jr.   ! magus@drktowr.chi.il.us
   -sysadmin drktowr       ! lgilibe@orion.it.luc.edu
  Chicago, IL  USA         ! 
---------------------------------------------------------
From: fredex@fcshome.UUCP (fred smith)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: cc in 386 uses ram?
Date: 9 Nov 92 05:04:10 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: What?!? Absolutely none!
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

BUCHANAN TIMOTHY E (buchanan@rintintin.Colorado.EDU) wrote:
: 
: Does the cc command in C386 use /ram for its temp files, or must this be set
: somehow as with C286? tx,
: Timothy. 
: 

Yes it uses 'ram', but I don't know about '/ram'. Try "man cc" and check
out the '-T' option, which allows you to set the size of the ram buffer
used.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 .----   Fred Smith    /                Office: 508-663-2524|Home: 617-438-5471
( /__  ,__.   __   __ /  __   : /                  fredex%fcshome@merk.merk.com
 /    /  /   /__) /  /  /__) .+'                   or uunet!merk!fcshome!fredex
/    /  (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__   BIX: fredex    or    primerd!fcshome!fredex  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: bob@dalek.mwc.com (Bob Hemedinger)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: your mail
Date: 5 Nov 92 14:07:24 GMT
Reply-To: "Coherent operating system" <COHERENT@indycms.bitnet>

>
>         id AA09304; Thu, 5 Nov 92 01:18:54 -0600
> Received: from utacfd.uta.edu by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP
>         (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA16488; Thu, 5 Nov 92 02:18:26 -0500
> Received: by utacfd.uta.edu (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)
>         id <m0mn1D1-000JEPC@utacfd.uta.edu>; Thu, 5 Nov 92 01:00 CST
> Received: by rwsys.lonestar.org (/\=-/\ Smail3.1.18.1 #18.8)
>         id <m0mn0gl-0000HAC@rwsys.lonestar.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 92 00:27 CST
> Received: by softin.lonestar.org (1.65/waf)
>         via UUCP; Wed, 04 Nov 92 22:41:37 CST
>         for COHERENT@indycms.bitnet
> To: "Coherent operating system" <COHERENT@indycms.bitnet>
> Subject: Re: 4.0 suggestions
> From: rjt%softin.lonestar.org@harvunxw.BITNET (Richard Threlkeld)
> Comments: Validated
> Message-Id: <yJyqTB1w165w@softin.lonestar.org>
> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 92 22:36:45 CST
> In-Reply-To: <9211020815.AA00224@dalek.mwc.com>
> Organization: Software Innovation, Arlington, Tx
>
> bob@dalek.mwc.com (Bob Hemedinger) writes:
>
> >
> > I have personally noted an average 25% increase in throughput, but your
 milea
> > may vary.
> >
> I have had many, many problems getting Taylor to work (v1.03) with
> my Coherent 4.0 system.  Though I know you (that is MWC) do not
> support Taylor, could you give me any information on how you
> have configured Taylor.
>
> If I do not get it working reliably soon, I will be returning to the
> slower COH version.
>
> More specifically, it talks well with my Unix news feed, but does not
> complete transfers with my DOS/Waffle box.  The Unix news feed has no
> problems with the DOS/Waffle.  I also get errors where uucico hangs
> holding the port and the modem has dropped CD.  The init task
> puts up messages saying it cannot attach the port and the system
> eventually hangs up requiring a re-boot.
>
> Thanks for any assistance.
>

I really can't offer any advise on version 1.03. It has been some time since
I have personally worked with it. I can only suggest at this point that you try
the port we did of version 1.04. If this version gives you problems, we can
work with you on it.

--
		   MWC Technical Support (bob@mwc.com)
(====================]          _____
         \\             (===================)
   (======\\======]         /// ~~~~~
           \\/             ///	        You'd make an excellent Nazi, Captain.
    ===========================
     =========================(
From: POSTMASTER@indycms.bitnet (Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: (none)
Date: 5 Nov 92 07:20:25 GMT
Reply-To: "Coherent operating system" <COHERENT@indycms.bitnet>


        id AA09304; Thu, 5 Nov 92 01:18:54 -0600
Received: from utacfd.uta.edu by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP
        (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA16488; Thu, 5 Nov 92 02:18:26 -0500
Received: by utacfd.uta.edu (/\==/\ Smail3.1.25.1 #25.1)
        id <m0mn1D1-000JEPC@utacfd.uta.edu>; Thu, 5 Nov 92 01:00 CST
Received: by rwsys.lonestar.org (/\=-/\ Smail3.1.18.1 #18.8)
        id <m0mn0gl-0000HAC@rwsys.lonestar.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 92 00:27 CST
Received: by softin.lonestar.org (1.65/waf)
        via UUCP; Wed, 04 Nov 92 22:41:37 CST
        for COHERENT@indycms.bitnet
To: "Coherent operating system" <COHERENT@indycms.bitnet>
Subject: Re: 4.0 suggestions
From: rjt%softin.lonestar.org@harvunxw.BITNET (Richard Threlkeld)
Comments: Validated
Message-Id: <yJyqTB1w165w@softin.lonestar.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 92 22:36:45 CST
Organization: Software Innovation, Arlington, Tx

bob@dalek.mwc.com (Bob Hemedinger) writes:

>
> I have personally noted an average 25% increase in throughput, but your milea
> may vary.
>
I have had many, many problems getting Taylor to work (v1.03) with
my Coherent 4.0 system.  Though I know you (that is MWC) do not
support Taylor, could you give me any information on how you
have configured Taylor.

If I do not get it working reliably soon, I will be returning to the
slower COH version.

More specifically, it talks well with my Unix news feed, but does not
complete transfers with my DOS/Waffle box.  The Unix news feed has no
problems with the DOS/Waffle.  I also get errors where uucico hangs
holding the port and the modem has dropped CD.  The init task
puts up messages saying it cannot attach the port and the system
eventually hangs up requiring a re-boot.

Thanks for any assistance.
From: ron@zooid.guild.org (Secret Mud)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: DBMS package
Date: 12 Nov 92 16:05:12 GMT

From: ron@zooid.guild.org (Secret Mud)
>From: messina@netcom.com (Tony Porczyk)
>>
>>Does anyone know of good dbms packages (multiple users) for Coherent?
>>
>>t.
>>
>There is one.  (How good it is, I don't know.)  Mark Williams lists it on
>their list of ported software.  I'll check it and get back to you.  (Hmm... If
>we set up a uucp mail link between here and CyberSquid, I could just mail the
>"news" file to you...)

Oops.  I thought I was in a newsgroup local to the system I netnews from.
Anyway, there is supposed to be a package ported to Coherent, and if no one
has replied by the time I get back, I'll let you know.
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent,comp.unix.questions
From: jboggs@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (John D. Boggs)
Subject: Re: rz problems at 9600 baud
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 19:39:57 GMT

From article <9211070223.34@phzzzt.uucp>, by mfaurot@phzzzt.uucp (Michael Faurot):
>> jboggs@news.weeg.uiowa.edu (John D. Boggs) writes:
>> 
>> >Has anyone experienced problems using rz/sz at 9600 baud?  I just
>> >bought a 9600 baud modem and am experiencing problems I've never had
>> >before (at 2400).  I give my remote host the sz command, then call rz
>> >using minicom's receive feature, and the computer proceeds to give me
>> >all sorts of error messages one after the other (sometimes getting some
> 
> Try switching to using hardware flow control at both the modem end and the
> tty port.  Consult your modem manual for the exact command string required,
> but for Coherent you want to be sure to be using devices like com1fl and
> com1fr.
> -- 

What are com1fl and com1fr?  I don't seem to have them.  Are they 4.0
critters?  (I still have 3.2.1)

-John D. Boggs     john-boggs@uiowa.edu
From: fredex@fcshome.UUCP (fred smith)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: dmake, gmake, which?
Date: 12 Nov 92 20:38:15 GMT
Organization: What?!? Absolutely none!
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

BUCHANAN TIMOTHY E (buchanan@rintintin.Colorado.EDU) wrote:
: What advantages do dmake and gmake offer over the stock make which comes
: with Coho? Of these two, which do people prefer?

The big advantage is that THEY WORK!

Not that Coherent's make doesn't, but it's just weird enough that
it chokes on a considerable number of "ordinary"  Unix makefiles.

When you say "gmake" I assume you mean GNU make. I've been using 3.62 here
since porting it a couple of months ago with very few problems--a LOT
fewer than with Coherent's make.

: 
: Timothy. 
:
From: magus@drktowr.chi.il.us (Louis Giliberto)
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject: Re: Subliminal advertising...:-)
Date: 8 Nov 92 05:52:36 GMT
Organization: DarkTower Software
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Jon Freivald (jaf@jaflrn.UUCP) wrote:
: I thought I has seen something, but as you said, it's gone real fast, so
: I wasn't even sure I'd seen anything.

See what?  I've got it on a 386/40.  I'm lucky if I see the '/'!

Hehehe.
-Louis
--
---------------------------------------------------------
 Louis J. Giliberto, Jr.   ! magus@drktowr.chi.il.us
   -sysadmin drktowr       ! lgilibe@orion.it.luc.edu
  Chicago, IL  USA         ! 
---------------------------------------------------------
Organization: K.U.Leuven - Academic Computing Center
Date: Friday, 6 Nov 1992 11:46:12 +01
From: K.Kanev <FHCAA83@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be>
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
Subject:    memory protection ?

I can make my system crash (panic) with a program that allocates
a *very* large array. Is this a bug or is there a problem with
my installation ?
(Is Coherent using demand paging as mentioned in the article in Byte
of August ?)
Wim.
FHCAA83@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be
From: Sammy@btnbbs.UUCP (Sammy)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: Qemm(ems)&dv.
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 92 19:17:58 +06
Organization: btnbbs - Stow, Ohio  (216)688-3894

Mabye it's me doing something wrong, but..

Both my bios and dos5's mem.exe report 1280k of "contiguous" extended memory, but when I load QEMM, that number drops to about 800k. I loaded EMS40.SYS from Pc magazine, and managed to get the entire 1280k of EMS. But, desqview wouldn't run.  Do I need a new version of DV?  I have dv 2.32 and qemm 5.12.

--  
----------------------------
Coming right outta:
btnbbs!sammy@aldhfn.akron.oh.us

Hi, I'm a .sig virus!  Put me in your .sig and have fun!
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: russ1066@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Russell J Mellon)
Subject: Re: Street prices for DesqView/X
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 15:04:57 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.230958.2519@walter.cray.com> alheid@sedist.cray.com (Greg Alheid) writes:
>In article <stefans.720433366@bauv106>, stefans@bauv106.bauv.unibw-muenchen.de (Stefan Schwarz) writes:
>|> I want to buy Desqview/X with a very limited budget. So i would very
>|> appreciate any informations about the actual prices and where i can 
>|> get them.
>|> 
>|> Thanks in advance,
>|> Stefan
>|> -- 
>|> __
>|> Stefan Schwarz                            University of the armed forces
>|> Laboratory for graphical data processing  W-8014 Neubiberg, FRG
>|> --
>
>  The best package I have seen so far is DESQview/X with the "DESQview/X to 
>other X systems Network Manager" at Egghead Software for $199. This is the 
>same price that the regular DESQview/X is going for.
>
>-- 
>| Greg Alheid               
>| alheid@pittpa.cray.com
>

Check out Computability's price: $161 for straight DV/X.  Not sure if they have
any thing else for DV/X, can always call and find out.

Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: abooth@ERA.COM (Alan Booth)
Subject: Multiuser access of DV/X on NetWare.
Organization: Engineering Research Associates, Vienna, VA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 20:49:28 GMT

I would like to load DV/X on a NetWare 3.11 File Server for multi-user access.
I have read the Qdeck white paper on setting up DESQview this way.  Has
anyone done this with DV/X?  If so, I would like to find out what files have
to be in the users directory and any other changes that had to be made.

Thanks...

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Alan Booth                          Software Development Manager         |
  | email    abooth@era.com             Engineering Research Assoc., Inc.    |
  | phone    (703)734-8800 ext. 8523    1595 Springhill Rd, Vienna, VA 22182 |
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: kc2x+@andrew.cmu.edu (Kwan-Ju Chen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: DV/X+TCP + PCTCP +tcp/ip network pacakge
Date: 7 Nov 92 06:22:19 GMT
Article-I.D.: andrew.YeyyovK00iUy41Lpgv
Organization: Junior, IM - H&SS Track, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA



Hi!  DV/X does recognize my FTP PCTCP network during the setup.  However
after I install the Tcpip network package I got an error message when I
try the network setup.  I can't remember the messages exactly but it
says that there something wrong with my ipcust.sys and ifcust.sys file. 
But in my PCTCP directory I don't see the ifcust.sys file. My PCTCP is
2.05 patch level 3.  What wrong?
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: jpe@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (John Paul Elrod)
Subject: Re: What video card for Desqview X?
Organization: Johns Hopkins University, Research Administration Services
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 20:31:28 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.182417@phillip.edu.au> t9114145@phillip.edu.au writes:
>Could someone who is using a nice fast processor based card recommend one for
>me to look at? Lots of places are trying to sell me a Diamond Stealth VRAM,
>but that's not an 8514A based card which the FAQ recommends. What is the best
>card for Desqview X/DOS use? I am also looking at a 17" monitor..

I use the ATI Ultra 8514/A, which supports 1024x768x256 to 72Hz with 1MB RAM.
It's fast and works great with DESQview/X.  I think a lot of other people use
this board too.  For 17" monitors, try the NEC 5FG.
-- 
John Paul Elrod                     -    jpe@jhuspo.ca.jhu.edu
Information Systems Manager         -    (410) 516-8732
Research Administration Services    -    300 Whitehead Hall
Johns Hopkins University            -    Baltimore, Maryland 21218
From: michael@ecst.csuchico.edu (Michael Perelman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
Subject: loading disk caches high
Date: 5 Nov 92 22:45:22 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico
NNTP-Posting-Host: cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu

Is there a disk cache program that qemm can safely load in high memory?

Thanks

Michael Perelman
michael@ecst.csuchico.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview
From: burge@qdeck.com (Bill Burge)
Subject: Re: Disk caches & QEMM+SF:???
Organization: Quarterdeck Office Systems, Santa Monica CA
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 16:44:40 GMT

In article <Nov02.171203.24343@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> knepley@CS.ColoState.EDU (Ranseus (Jim Knepley)) writes:
>Are there any disk caches out there that support the correct page frame
>restoration required for them to co-exist in "advanced mode" with QEMM
>using Stealth?  I've heard that Superpckwik is supposed to support
>Stealth in the next revision, whenever that's gonna' be, are there any
>that support it NOW?
>
>Jim

SuperPCKwik supports it now.

Bill	burge@qdeck.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.desqview