HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: brian@ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: Dr4-10...
Date: 6 Apr 92 16:08:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: ucsd.ku0troINNr5d
Organization: The Avant-Garde of the Now, Ltd.
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

jra@lawday.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (John Ackermann) writes:
>That's a real problem... when you have a system that can turn around in
>6 or 7ms, adding the several hundred milliseconds that many RF-sensed
>amps need to switch is a real downer.

On the other hand, it's not too much trouble to run a new wire into the
amp and connect it to the PTT circuit in the associated transmitter -
that way you don't have the delay in the RF sensing circuit to deal
with.

Typical clapper-type relays switch in 4 to 5 milliseconds, so the relay
isn't going to be a timing problem when keying up.  However, they DO
take longer - sometimes tens of milliseconds - to UNKEY.  This is
worsened by spike diodes.

I suspect that some sort of totem-pole driver that would short the relay
coil on unkey would significantly quicken the unkey time, but it'd have
to be a pretty beefy transistor.  Luckily, TV horizontal output
transistors are only a few dollars.

This begs the question of whether the relay would survive typical packet
duty cycles.

I have been using the antenna relays out of old junk Motorola radios for
my 56kb stuff.  They are reasonably fast, and they're of sealed-reed
construction, so they may survive.
	- Brian
From: lowell@techbook.com (Lowell Brunson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: How do I kill kiss on tnc2?
Date: 10 Apr 92 23:28:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: techbook.1992Apr10.232815.10202
Organization: TECHbooks of Beaverton Oregon - Public Access Unix

I have managed to get my PacCom TNC220, which is suppossed to be
user interface compatable (more or less) with a TNC2, into the KISS
mode.  Works great for tcp/ip etc.  I can`t find any documentation 
that tells me how to take it back out of KISS mode.  Any hints?
  73 Lowell (kc7dx@n7pwf.or.usa.na)

-- 

Lowell Brunson
KC7DX @ N7PWF.OR.USA.NA (Packet Radio Only!)
lowell@techbook.COM  Public Access User --- Not affiliated with TECHbooks
From: ray@cc.tut.fi (Harri Viertola (OH6LDL))
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: G3RUH with IC-32E/A, anyone?
Date: 8 Apr 92 09:35:34 GMT
Organization: Tampere University of Technology, Finland


   I have just finished constructing my G3RUH 9600bps modem and now
   I need to get it connected to my radio, which is IC-32E. I know that
   it might not be possible, but I don't have the cash to buy a new rig
   at the moment. Any help with this is welcome


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Harri Viertola, InterNet: ray@cc.tut.fi Packet: OH3LDL@OH3RBR.FIN.EU
   IRC:Harri  Phone:+358-31-552 500  Addr:Ilmarink. 39 B 22, 33500 Tampere
       .tut.fi stands for Tampere University of Technology, Finland
From: pme@lysator.liu.SE
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: BPQ 4.05 FTP site ?
Date: 12 Apr 92 12:33:12 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

Where can I find BPQ 4.05 for FTP ?

/Sm5ohi
From: Don_R._Moberly.El_Segundo@xerox.COM
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: WIRELESS LAN (DAVID SWEIGERT)
Date: 15 Apr 1992 09:25:51 -0700
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
Reply-To: Don_R._Moberly.El_Segundo@xerox.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

DAVID
I HAVE BEEN USING THE TELELAN SYSTEM HERE FOR ABOUT TWO YEARS. AND HAVE USED
THE WAVELAN AND WAN ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS. IF YOU LIKE YOU CAN CALL OR EMAIL
ME YOUR QUESTIONS AND I WILL TRY TO HELP.
PHONE (310) 333 7389
EMAILDon R. Moberly:El Segundo:Xerox
INTERNET 13.1.205.47
73
 DON
From: dave@ips.oz.au (Dave Horsfall)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: Why segregate TCP/IP? (was Re: kbd to kbd)
Date: 15 Apr 92 02:20:49 GMT
Organization: IPS Radio and Space Services.  Sydney, Australia.

In article <1992Apr11.193548.17601@NCoast.ORG>
    allbery@ncoast.org (Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH) writes:

>I see you've never experienced a mixture of exponential- and linear-backoff
>stations on a single channel before.  I have.  The result is that the
>exponential-backoff stations essentially lose the frequency because the linear
>backoff scheme is inherently more aggressive.  Even on mode VC connections:
>a simple AX.25 connect from an exponential-backoff NOS still loses the
>frequency to linear-backoff stations.

Hmmm...  Wouldn't the linear-backoff people time out first?  I'm one of
the few people in my area using p-persistence, and it seems that under
heavy congestion, the FRACK/DWAIT brigade time out before I do...

-- 
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU)         VK2KFU @ VK2RWI.NSW.AUS.OC
dave@ips.OZ.AU                  ...munnari!ips.OZ.AU!dave
       ADA - from the people who brought you COBOL
From: allbery@NCoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: NOS under G8BPQ: is it worth it, under what conditions?
Date: 13 Apr 92 03:04:13 GMT
Article-I.D.: NCoast.1992Apr13.030413.2551
Organization: North Coast Public Access *NIX, Cleveland, OH

I just pulled down the G8BPQ node software, and noticed that it has an
interface to run NOS under it.  The documentation implies that this is for use
with e.g. DesqView; a local ham, however, tells me he runs NOS under DesqView
without G8BPQ and without difficulties.

Anyway, my questions are:

(1) What benefits are there from running NOS under G8BPQ?
(2) Are there any special circumstances when use of G8BPQ with NOS is a
    particularly good idea?  Or a particularly BAD idea?
(3) Is there any documentation for G8BPQ that is somewhat better assembled
    than the docs in BPQ405.ZIP?  (I didn't think anything had worse docs than
    NOS! ---now I know better.)  I suspect I wouldn't be driven to ask here
    if the docs that came with it did a better job of explaining the benefits
    of the G8BPQ software.

I should mention that I've already asked locally; nobody around here uses it.
(I thought for sure KB7YW would be able to give me pointers; ah, well.)

++Brandon
-- 
Brandon S. Allbery, KF8NH [44.70.4.88]        allbery@NCoast.ORG
Senior Programmer, Telotech, Inc. (if I may call myself that...)
From: glenne@hpnmdla.sr.hp.com (Glenn Elmore)
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 22:16:35 GMT
Subject: Re: Dr4-10...
Organization: HP Network Measurements Div, Santa Rosa, CA
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet

In rec.radio.amateur.packet, brian@ucsd.edu (Brian Kantor) writes:

    jra@lawday.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (John Ackermann) writes:

    Typical clapper-type relays switch in 4 to 5 milliseconds, so the relay
    isn't going to be a timing problem when keying up.  However, they DO
    take longer - sometimes tens of milliseconds - to UNKEY.  This is
    worsened by spike diodes.

Really? The few electo-mechanical switches I've looked at (they were
attenuators along with T/R switches for a 432 MHz EME station) appeared
to switch in a few milliseconds but then they often bounced after
another several.  I didn't feel too comfortable in applying lots of
power until 20 milliseconds had gone by.  Maybe I just tried the wrong
brand.

    This begs the question of whether the relay would survive typical packet
    duty cycles.

    I have been using the antenna relays out of old junk Motorola radios for
    my 56kb stuff.  They are reasonably fast, and they're of sealed-reed
    construction, so they may survive.

How about using Mitsubishi (or anyone else's for that matter) MD00X
series of PIN switches?  They switch very rapidly, under a microsecond,
and take lots and lots of cycles.  The "H" suffix generally are spec'd
to handle at least 25 watts.  I've used these at 900 and 1200 MHz with
great success but there are also versions for 140 and 440 MHz territory.
I think if enough people called RF Parts that they might finally
actually get some in stock.  I've asked them for them several times and
they've said something like "yes, we can get them if there is interest"
but I guess I never had enough $'s to get them to count it as interest.
  I'm using the MD003H and MD004H in the 900 and 1200 MHz radios and they've
been great. Varieties of the MD001 and M007 work at vhf and low uhf.

  Another alternative is to buy a few Unitrode (or other) PIN diodes and
build your own.  I think Microwave Components of Michigan had parts a
while back and they may still.  It should only cost a few dollars 
for even a fairly high power switch. Insertion loss is generally between 
.5 and 1 dB for the ones I've used.

Glenn Elmore n6gn

N6GN @ K3MC      
amateur IP:	glenn@SantaRosa.ampr.org
Internet:	glenne@sr.hp.com 


Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: coleve@cc.uvcc.edu
Subject: Re: Baudot TTY wantedREAD/NEW/FOLLOWUP
Organization: Utah Valley Communtiy College
Date: 13 Apr 92 18:17:03 -0700

>In article <dlhanson.10@nap.amoco.com>, dlhanson@nap.amoco.com (David L. Hanson) writes:
> Sorry to pollute this group slightly.  But I thought that maybe someone
> here might be able to help me.  I am looking for a Baudot terminal so
> that I can talk to my deaf friend without using a relay service.  I
> don't want to spend the several hundred $'s to buy either a new TDD or
> a Baudot operable modem.  
> 
This is an addition to David's request.  I have the feeling that a _low_
speed packet box, such as a PK232 using the HF interface, should be able
to be connected to a telephone line using a fairly simple circuit.
They will handle all sorts of tone pairs and have built-in Baudot conversion.
Couldn't you use the HF interface to run TDD service to a deaf friend and
still have the VHF interface to run 1200 baud to a radio?

I have a deaf friend who is at this moment studying for his n.c. tech license
so that he can run packet.  With the digital modes, there is no reason a
person actually has to HEAR a radio to be a ham!

I also want to do a similar hookup for TDD access to the timesharing
computers here at the college.  TDD modems are freighfully expensive --
over $300 for a 45.5 baud half-duplex modem is robbery.  If one/some of us
hams can come up with a better answer we will be doing a really good deed
for a segment of our population who could use a little help.

Anybody got any good ideas?  I will collect them, and if anything really neat
comes up will forward to my local defnet BBS.

-- Vern Cole -- Systems Manager -- Utah Valley Community College --
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: allbery@NCoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH)
Subject: Re: Help 2nd try tcpip ka9q problem
Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.org (Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH)
Organization: North Coast Public Access *NIX, Cleveland, OH
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 00:01:42 GMT
Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.packet

As quoted from <1992Apr2.171606.23719@telesoft.com> by garym@telesoft.com (Gary Morris @lone):
+---------------
| In article <11321@perryd> perryd@Software.Mitel.COM (Dave Perry) writes:
| >In article <1992Mar31.003359.12431@NCoast.ORG> allbery@ncoast.org (Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH) writes:
| >>AX.25 is a poor wrapper for IP and NET/ROM packets; unfortunately, thanks to
| >>the FCC it's all we have.  (grrr.....)
| >>
| >Is this true? That is, is there a legal requirement to use AX.25 frames
| >to encapsulate IP datagrams? Or would any framing which contained the
| >transmitting station's call do?
| 
| 97.109d essentially says that stations under automatic control and passing
| third party traffic must use AX.25 protocol.  The originating station must
| not be automatically controlled.  
| 
| So unless you pass NTS traffic, you don't have to use AX.25.
+---------------

I beg your pardon, but the definition of "third party traffic" in Part 97 is
such that digipeating and NET/ROM and IP packet forwarding qualify.  You can
therefore omit AX.25 Level 2 only for direct point-to-point links not running
e.g. POP.

This is annoying.

++Brandon
-- 
Brandon S. Allbery, KF8NH [44.70.4.88]        allbery@NCoast.ORG
Senior Programmer, Telotech, Inc. (if I may call myself that...)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: eac@world.std.com (Eric A Cottrell)
Subject: NEPRA Packet Meeting Sat Apr 11 @ 1PM
Summary: New England Packet Radio Meeting this saturday
Keywords: NEPRA MEETING
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Distribution: ne
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 02:20:58 GMT

The next meeting of the New England Packet Radio Association 
will be held Saturday, April 11 at 1:00 PM.  This month
will focus on BBS sysop issues from "How to setup a proper BBS"
to "Forwarding mail in New England". A beginner's session will
start at 1:00 PM with the main meeting at 1:30 PM.
 
Users are invitied to participate with questions or suggestions
on all aspects of BBS operation from "How to start using a BBS"
to "How to use the Server features".
 
Note: The meeting will be held at the MITRE Corporation in 
Bedford, Ma. Easy access at the junction of Routes 3 and 62. 
 
Directions:
 
From Route 128 in Lexington, take Route 3 North one exit to 
Route 62. At the end of the down ramp (at the traffic light) 
turn right (East) on 62. 
 
From Route 495 in Lowell, take Route 3 South to the Route 62 
exit - about 6 miles. Turn left (East) at the end of the down 
ramp and pass under Route 3. 
 
MITRE is the large complex immediately on your left at the 
second set of traffic lights. Enter the MITRE driveway and 
bear left at the fork. 
 
Either:  
 
Drive around the two story garage, pass over two speed bumps 
and turn right into "PC" parking lot. You pass first a two 
story Power House building. The cafeteria is a one story 
building further along on your right. 
 
Or:
 
Park in the two story garage at the top of the small hill 
after entering the MITRE driveway. Use the asphalt walkway 
around the south side of the building under construction 
heading east between the two two story buildings marked "B" 
and "D" to the next one story building marked "C" on your 
right. 
                                                   
In either case, enter the cafeteria (one story building) down 
a narrow hardtop walkway. 

73 Eric eac@world.std.com
From: enge@almaden.ibm.com (Roy Engehausen)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: BPQ FTP sites
Date: 13 Apr 92 01:08:09 GMT
Article-I.D.: ucsd.9204130107.AA16420
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

BPQ405.ZIP is available on tomcat.gsfc.nasa.gov.  I have also posted
it to ucsd.edu and it will be available there as soon as Brian
migrates it.

Roy, AA4RE
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: payne@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Andrew Payne)
Subject: Re:  Poor Man's packet & modem
Organization: Cornell Theory Center
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 14:59:02 GMT

In article <clemon.07vs@lemsys.UUCP> clemon@lemsys.UUCP (Craig Lemon VE3XCL) writes:
 [... stuff about using modems for VHF/UHF 1200 baud packet ...]

>        But if we do have a Bell 202(A?) compatible modem, how might we go
>about making a TNC out of them?  Is it possible at all.  It seems that my
>old GVC 1200 had a command 'ath4' that was for special external connections
>(some connotations towards radio were mentioned).  A relay clicked inside
>the modem but the phone was not taken off of the hook.

	Old Bell 202 modems can be used on packet.  In fact, that's what
was first used back in the "old days".  I've not used any old telephone 
modems on packet, so I can only speculate on how to go about converting 
one.  You have to figure out:

(a) how to hook up the radio
(b) how to interface the modem to the TNC or computer (might have to worry 
    about RS-232 or TTL level conversions)
(c) if your modem is a smart modem, you have to figure out how to command it
    into the 202 mode after you've done (b)

	After you've done all this work, you still just have a modem (you
need a TNC).  Unless you have a garage full of surplus modems, it's probably 
not worth the trouble.

	If you can, ignore 1200 baud packet and start at 9600 baud or faster.
If you must have 1200 baud, build a modem around TI's TCM3105 chip.  Its cheap,
stable, low-power, needs only +5, and works very well.

-- 
=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =
Andrew C. Payne, N8KEI        UUCP:  ...!cornell!batcomputer!payne
                          INTERNET:  payne@tc.cornell.edu
From: kagoos@memstvx1.memst.edu
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Memphis Mini-Fest 04/18
Date: 11 Apr 92 16:29:51 GMT
Organization: Memphis State University


                         MEMPHIS MINI-FEST 92
                         --------------------
There will be a MINI-FEST at State Technical Institute-Memphis on April 18th!!
State Tech is located just to the south-west of exit 12 on I40 in east Memphis.
Talk in will be on the W4BS repeater system, 146.82, 224.42 and 443.2.

Table set-up begins at 8:00 and the doors open for general admission at 8:30.
For table information, please contact KC4ZOV @ W4BS via packet or 901-363-3159
via land-line.  Tables are $5.00 and admission is $2.00.

The following is a list of ONLY those forums that are confirmed AT THIS DATE.
Others are in the planning stages.  All forums will be in the Engineering
building at class rooms indicated by LOCATION.

  TIME   TITLE                LOCATION    PRESENTER

  09:00  Eastern Ark. Emer.     F112      by  Wayne, N5JLJ & Joe, N5MIG
         Preparedness                         Phillips County Arkansas

         HF Digital Modes       F116      by  Hugh, WA4SLI

  10:00  Shelby County RACES    F114      by  Dana, WI3B
                                              Shelby County RACES Officer

         Army MARS              F118      by  Pat Lane, W4OQG

  11:00  Tower Legal Issues,    F112      by  Dwayne, KC4POI
         etc.                                 ARRL Volunteer Counsel

         Beginner's DX Forum    F116      by  Dennis, WF4G

  12:00  VE Testing             F118      by  John, WZ5S & Dana,WI3B

  13:00  BBS Access & Activity  F112      by  Buddy, WX2G, Suresh, N9GSA (W4BS)
         (panel members)                      Tom, KA4P (KA4P, Trenton)
                                              Roy, WX2B (WX2B, Memphis)
                                              Harry, AI5R (AI5R, Lakeland)

         ARES Forum             F116      by  O.D.Keaton, WA4GLS,
                                              ARRL Tennessee Section Manager &
                                              Steve, NX3W, Shelby Cty ARES EC

  14:00  VHF/UHF Forum          F114      by  Dave, N4MW
                                              ARRL Technical Coordinator

         Antenna Forum          F118      by  Rodger, K4HTB
    
  15:00  W4BS Packet Repeater   F112      by  Steve, KM4WQ & Terry, KB4KA

         Antenna Forum (Cont)   F118      by  Rodger, K4HTB

Additional forums we are trying to confirm are:

  Weather Service - Warning & Preparedness
  ATV Repeater
  DFing (Fox or Rabbit Hunting)

We hope everyone will attend the Mini-Fest and as many forums as possible.  You
cannot find a less expensive way to learn more and increase your enjoyment in
our Amateur Radio hobby!

The doors will close at 4:00 pm.  However, there will be a sysop's meeting for
BBS, THENET/NETROM and ROSE sysops at 5:00 pm.  See me for details on the sysop
meeting.

Hope to CU there, 73, Terry KB4KA
From: ford@eecs.ucdavis.edu (Gary Ford)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Beginner's Guide to TCP/IP
Date: 10 Apr 92 06:12:50 GMT
Organization: U.C. Davis - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Originator: ford@madrone.eecs.ucdavis.edu

I have written a document entitled "Beginner's Guide to TCP/IP on the
Amateur Packet Radio Network Using the KA9Q Internet Software."
Version 2.0 of the guide documents the use of NOS 911229 (PA0GRI v2.0h)
and BM v3.3.2.

The document is available in three forms by anonymous ftp from
filbert.eecs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.57.123] in the directory pub/ka9q.

"nosbgnlp.zip" unzips to a 66 page ascii "line printer" document,
which can be printed with the UNIX lpr command.

"nosbgnps.zip" unzips to a 54 page PostScript document, which can
be printed on a PostScript printer.

"nosbgnpr.zip" unzips to a 66 page ascii "print" document, which
can be printed using the DOS print command.  You will need to send
control codes to your printer to control the page offset and you
should turn perforation skip off.

I am unable to provide access to this document in any way other
than anonymous ftp.  Those of you who do make it available in
other ways (on a BBS for example), please let me know and I can
pass this information on to those who inquire.

Comments and suggestions for change to the document are welcome.

	Gary Ford, N6GF
From: wd6ehr@wd6ehr.ampr.ORG (Mike Curtis)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: D-410 reply
Date: 10 Apr 92 21:54:15 GMT
Reply-To: ames!elroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov!puffin!wd6ehr.ampr.org!wd6ehr
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

There is a simple solution to COR-operated RF amp keyup delay - use 
direct PTT.

However, many COR's may be minimally modified for substantially
shorter keyup delay by simply tweaking a capacitor or 2, altering a
resistor or 2; or (better yet) getting rid of the clanker and using
PIN diodes, a move usually appreciated by XYL's if your shack is
adjacent to your bedroom and the local insomniacs victimize your
machine in the middle of the night =8-O

 --
 Mike   wd6ehr.ampr.org!wd6ehr@puffin.UUCP
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
From: ben@vulcan.austin.ibm.com (Ben Klausner)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Combined radio/TNC
Date: 6 Apr 92 19:32:41 GMT
Organization: IBM PSP Austin, Tx.

Does anyone know of a combined 2 meter radio/TNC? This would seem to be a
logical combination. Thanks.

N5DJL

-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  unet: ben@perfmap.austin.ibm.com         | My opinions are my own.
  CI$:  76337,1730                         | IBM's are confidential.
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: faunt@cisco.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS 415-688-8269)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: re: List of 4800 baud and 9600 baud capable radios needed.
Date: 9 Apr 92 03:01:23 GMT
Article-I.D.: dirt.9204091700.AA03145
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu

TAPR's got some of this information.  It happens that the Jan '92 PSR
has the connection points for the TM221.  RX can be gotten from
IC1-pin 9, and TX may be be injected at connection #7 on the VCO
assembly on the TX/RX unit.  There's more information in the article.

TAPR can be reached at 602-749-9479

73, doug, N6TQS,  <faunt@cisco.com>
From: mto@nic.funet.fi (Markku Toijala)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: BPQ 4.05 FTP site ?
Date: 13 Apr 92 12:46:19 GMT
Organization: Finnish University and Research Network (FUNET)

In <199204121231.AA29769@robin.lysator.liu.se> pme@lysator.liu.SE writes:

>Where can I find BPQ 4.05 for FTP ?

>/Sm5ohi

Try nic.funet.fi, file pub/ham/packet/g8bpq/bpq405.zip.

Markku / OH2BQZ
From: glenne@hpnmdla.sr.hp.com (Glenn Elmore)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.packet
Subject: Re: printed circuit diagram or 2Mbps datalink in 1991 ARRL handbook
Date: 10 Apr 92 15:31:21 GMT
Organization: HP Network Measurements Div, Santa Rosa, CA


Hello all,
  I've sent the previous posters on this string a short newsletter which
n6rce and I recently sent out to update and aid those building or thinking
of building the data links. 
  Please drop me a note if you would like a copy.

very 73

Glenn Elmore n6gn

N6GN @ K3MC      
amateur IP:	glenn@SantaRosa.ampr.org
Internet:	glenne@sr.hp.com