HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jcburt@gatsibm.larc.nasa.gov ()
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: Printer Accounting...
Date: 15 Dec 1992 17:55:25 GMT
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center
NNTP-Posting-Host: gatsibm.larc.nasa.gov

In article <BzB1Dp.2MvG@austin.ibm.com> yoder@austin.ibm.com writes:
>
>In article <1992Dec14.135920.20212@vedge.com>, kiron@vedge.com (Kiron D. Bondale) writes:
>> Hi all,  having a few problems with setting up the printer accounting.
>> 
>> 1. Essentially, I have specified my acctfile in /etc/qconfig, made sure
>> the file was "digested", made sure my acctfile existed and was writable,
>> made sure accounting was on, and STILL have had none of my printed
>> files showing up in the log.  All my users print via "lp"...none use
>> enq...is this the problem?
>> 
>
>It has nothing to do with which command you use.  The lp command in fact
>calls the enq command.  Note that accounting only works for local
>queues -- for remote printing, accounting will only work on the print
>server NOT on the print client's remote queue.
>
>A question about accounting came up a few days ago and this is what I
>had posted:
>
>...but the following worked fine for me:
>
>   1.  touch /tmp/qacct
>   2.  edit /etc/qconfig and add the 'acctfile=' parameter
>
>     lp0:
>           device = lp0
>           acctfile = /tmp/qacct
>     lp0:
>           file = /dev/lp0
>           header = never
>           trailer = never
>           access = both
>           backend = /usr/lib/lpd/piobe
>
>   3. run 'enq -d' to make sure that /etc/qconfig is digested
>   4. print a file to queue lp0
>   5. as root run the command 'pac -Plp0'
>
>      get the output:
>
>     Login               pages/feet   runs               price
>   root                        1.00    1                  USD .
>
>   total                       1.00    1                  USD .
>

Okay, I did everything you listed above, and I *do* get a similar response
to the 'pac ' command, but I *still* do not get anything reported
in my daily reports. I *still* get a column of zeros under the PRINT 
column in the daily reports, even thought the printers are used heavily.

Also, how do you configure 2 printers so that you get seperate accounting
on *both* printers...right now I'm only attempting to check one, but even that
doesn't work...suggestions ?

John
jcburt@gatsibm.larc.nasa.gov
From: mcbryde@navier.math.uh.edu (Jack Mcbryde)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: 3004-003 All available login sessions are in use
Date: 13 Dec 1992 00:02:29 GMT
Organization: UH Dept of Math
NNTP-Posting-Host: navier.math.uh.edu
Keywords: n

In article <Bz5vnC.A3D@austin.ibm.com> woan@exeter.austin.ibm.com (Ronald S. Woan) writes:
>Sounds like you ran into the license limit. If you are entitled
>to have more users, bump up the limit with the chlicense command
>or go into the system environment settings within smit.

And if I remember correctly, you have to reboot to get it to take effect.

jack
--
jack      mcbryde@karazm.math.uh.edu    * All I ask of Thee, Lord
* Christ died for our sins.  Dare we    * Is to be a drinker and fornicator
* make his martyrdom meaningless by     * An unbeliever and a sodomite
* not committing them? - Jules Feiffer  * And then to die. - Claude de Chauvigny
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: mtranle@paris.IntelliCorp.COM (Minh Tran-Le)
Subject: Re: More IBM "oversights"
Date: 15 Dec 92 06:23:12 GMT
Reply-To: tranle@intellicorp.com
Organization: IntelliCorp Inc.

dwight@geohub.gcn.uoknor.edu (Dwight D. Moore) writes:

>In article <4348@unisql.UUCP>, wrat@unisql.UUCP (wharfie) writes:
>|
>|>The xlc compiler is absolutely recalcitrant about accepting
>|>anything like " Window foo = NULL".  But the X11 headers
>|>are full of stuff like "XtWindowOfObject(object) != NULL"
>|>which of course won't compile with the native compiler.  We
>|>have to sprinkle our code with crap like "#ifdef IBM #undef XtIsRealized"
>|>and fix it.
>|>
>|>If IBM has a better compiler (I can't believe they compiled X  with
>|>xlc) can a customer get it?  Or does xlc have an undocumented
>|>"Stop behaving like turbo pascal" mode?

>A better compiler.? Don't blame
>IBM and their compiler for doing its job; you need to understand the
>nuances between K & R C, ANSI C, and the other mutations. xlc does
>what it is supposed to do. ANSI C has strict  type checking
>if the compiler enforces it, which is the default for xlc.
>Read the file  /usr/lpp/xlc/bin/README.xlc for more information
>on the compiler.

If you really want to stick with the strict ansi C version xlc or c89, you
need to compile with the following define:

	c89 -D_ALL_SOURCE -DNULL=0 ...

The X11R5 headers should be more correct it its useage of NULL.

Minh Tran-Le.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: fredrick@acd.ucar.edu (Timothy Fredrick)
Subject: 0516-366 lsvg: Volume group rootvg is locked try again -- ???
Organization: Ntl Center for Atmospheric Research - Atmospheric Chemistry Div
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 20:00:21 GMT

On an AIX 3.2.3+ system we get the message:

   0516-366 lsvg: Volume group rootvg is locked - try again

We get this message whenever we try to do an "lsvg rootvg" command.  This
started to occur, I think after some downtime in which our nvram was
corrupt and I had tried to use the "bosboot" command to install a boot file
on an hdiskn which may or may not have been correct.  Our system, running
AIX 3.2.3 with additional PTF's seems to run normally after I finally figured
out that we needed to reset the sequence of boot devices in nvram after booting
from our diagnostics diskettes.  Should we be worried
about our volume group being "locked"?  If so, how do we go about unlocking
it?

A 2nd question: At boot time we get the message "/dev/hd5 - not an AIX
logical volume" or something like that (I'm afraid I didn't write it down).
/dev/hd5 is the partition "/blv".  Why is this partition defined, and what
does it do?  Only this one machine complains that it isn't an AIX logical
volume -- is that a message we should worry about.

These things are happening on a working system, but any useful advice or
answers will definitely be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

--Tim Fredrick (fredrick@acd.ucar.edu)
  Ntl Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307-1000
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: joann@ariadne.SLAC.Stanford.EDU (Jo Ann Malina)
Subject: Re: Find option -prune not working in AIX3.2
Reply-To: joann@unixhub.slac.stanford.edu
Organization: SLAC (Stanford Linear Accelerator Center)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 04:02:45 GMT

In article <Bz3nIv.6E2@csd.cri.dk>, tnr@csd.cri.dk (Torben N. Rasmussen) writes:
|> The find option -prune is not working correctly in AIX3.2
|> 
|> The following command:
|> 
|> 	find /var -fstype nfs -prune -o -print
|> 
|> only prints:
|> 
|> 	/var
|> 
|> when it was supposed to print a lot of files in /var
|> 
|> Does anyone know of a fix for this problem.

One thing we noticed was that if find encountered an NFS file
system mounted at the top level -- that is:
find /here -fstype nfs prune -o -print

and an NFS file system was mounted at /here/there -- it would print
all the files in that file system, rather than ignore them.

I reported this problem with find and got a problem number,
9x378. No fix so far.

*) *) *) *) *) *) *) *) *) *) *)!(* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (* (*
Jo Ann Malina, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
joann@unixhub.slac.stanford.edu  -or-  415/926-2846
Neither Stanford nor the DOE would be caught dead with these opinions.
Nor do they consult me when formulating theirs.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: mikec@vivanet.com (Mike Chase)
Subject: AIX Software support
Organization: VIVATRON Corporation 
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 02:24:48 GMT


Hody Net,
 We are currently trying to decide to buy a Rs/6000-580, however a few
concerns have come to mind, could some kind sole please comment on the
following questions.

 1) Is SCSI-2 supported on the 580, I have heard the the current version
    of AIX does not or has some problems with this interface.

 2) I have been quoted aprox $560.00 per month for AIX phone support!
    Is this correct? is there any cheaper support packages??

 3) How much PD software runs on this thing, ie Cnews,trn,pcomm,emacs
    etc. I use some much net software on my current Unix SysV.3 machine
    that I hate to go to a platform which won't run any of the GREAT
    software I'm acustomed to.

 4) What software components are needed to run X on this thing, AIX windows
    X-station manager?. Are there any X-Terminals which will work with the 
    RS/6000 becides the IBM ones. Someone told me that I want X Stations 
    which have the window manager in rom instead of having to download that
    code when the X-station comes up. IS 2 meg on a X-station enough for good
    X performance and how much load does all of this put on the 6000??


Thanks In Advance

mikec@vivanet.com
From: horst@faui63.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Horst Luehrsen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: xntp and rc files
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 16:37:44 GMT
Organization: IMMD 6 - Lehrstuhl fuer Datenbanksysteme
Distribution: world
Reply-To: horst@faui63.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Horst Luehrsen)
NNTP-Posting-Host: faui63.informatik.uni-erlangen.de


In article <1992Dec15.230028.68@rcwusr>, jenkinsonjp@rcwusr.bp.com writes:
>From: jenkinsonjp@rcwusr.bp.com
>Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
>Subject: xntp and rc files
>
>how do *YOU* get xntp started at boot? scripts that work don't when
>invoked as an rc file. reboot opportunities are rare, so hints appreciated.
>
I start xntp in /etc/rclocal, startet from init. But sometimes xntp doesn't
come up after a reboot, so I use:

/etc/rc.local:
...
if [ -x /usr/local/etc/ntpdate ]; then
        /usr/local/etc/ntpdate ntps1-0 ntps1-1 ntps2-1
        echo " ntpdate"
fi

if [ -x /usr/local/etc/xntpd -a -f /usr/local/etc/ntp.conf ]; then
        /usr/local/etc/xntpd -c /usr/local/etc/ntp.conf
        echo " xntpd"
fi

echo "ksh /etc/xntp.restart" | at now+2minutes

/etc/xntp.restart:
...
ps -ef | grep -v grep | grep xntpd
if [[ $? = 0 ]]
then
    echo "xntp Version 3 time service already running"
else
    echo "Starting xntp Version 3 time service..."

    if [ -x /usr/local/etc/ntpdate ]; then
        /usr/local/etc/ntpdate ntps1-0 ntps1-1 ntps2-0
        echo " ntpdate"
    fi

    if [ -x /usr/local/etc/xntpd -a -f /usr/local/etc/ntp.conf ]; then
        /usr/local/etc/xntpd -c /usr/local/etc/ntp.conf
        echo " xntpd"
    fi
fi

	Horst
--
 Horst Luehrsen <luehrsen@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
 Martensstrasse 3, W-8520 Erlangen
 Tel: +49-9131-857884  Fax:+49-9131-32090
 ** No keyboard - Press F1 to continue! **
From: amundson@fairview.cc.ndsu.NoDak.edu (Dennis J. Amundson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: whereis 'biff' ?
Keywords: biff
Date: 13 Dec 92 03:14:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: ns1.Bz6H0y.KoE
Organization: ND Higher Education Computing Network

In article <620@thunder.LakeheadU.Ca>, gihill@thunder.LakeheadU.Ca 
(Geoff Hill) writes:
>Anyone know where 'biff' is hiding ?  According to the man page it is
>supposed to be in /usr/bin, but can't find it.  Is it in one of
>the optional install images ?  If so, which package should I install ?
>
>thanks.
>-- 
>Geoff Hill				UUCP: watmath!thunder!gihill
>Lakehead University		   Internet: occhill@busoff.lakeheadu.ca  (VMS)	
>Thunder Bay, Ontario, Can                     gihill@thunder.lakeheadu.ca (UNIX)

  You need to install the bosext1.extcmds.obj optional product.

-- 
Dennis J. Amundson              E-mail: amundson@fairview.cc.ndsu.nodak.edu
NDSU Computer Center            Bitnet: AMUNDSON at PLAINS
Fargo ND  58105                 Phone:  (701) 298-1042
From: julie@levell.austin.ibm.com (Julie L. Craft)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: 0516-366 lsvg: Volume group rootvg is locked try again -- ???
Date: 17 Dec 92 19:40:07 GMT
Organization: IBM, Austin

In article <1992Dec12.200021.19597@ncar.ucar.edu> fredrick@acd.ucar.edu (Timothy Fredrick) writes:
>On an AIX 3.2.3+ system we get the message:
>
>A 2nd question: At boot time we get the message "/dev/hd5 - not an AIX
>logical volume" or something like that (I'm afraid I didn't write it down).
>/dev/hd5 is the partition "/blv".  Why is this partition defined, and what
>does it do?  Only this one machine complains that it isn't an AIX logical
>volume -- is that a message we should worry about.
>
>These things are happening on a working system, but any useful advice or
>answers will definitely be appreciated.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>--Tim Fredrick (fredrick@acd.ucar.edu)
>  Ntl Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307-1000

You probably have "mount = true" set in your /etc/filesystem
file for /mnt.  hd5 is the boot logical volume, and /mnt is
used (and mounted) whenever you run bosboot, but you don't
want to mount hd5 on it's own because it's not a filesystem.
/blv:
        dev     = /dev/hd5
        vol     = "spare"
        mount   = false
        check   = false
        free    = false
        vfs     = jfs
        log     = /dev/hd8


Also, the lock message is usually because the lock attribute has
been left in the database because a lvm shell script was killed, etc.
putlvodm -K `getlvodm -v rootvg`
or
odmdelete -q "name=rootvg and attribute=lock" -o CuAt
will fix it.
But, make sure that there really isn't another lvm process running.
The reason we lock the volume group is so no other lvm commands can 
run at the same time.  An easy way out of a messy situation.

Later,
Julie
-- 
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: eswu@waterloo.austin.ibm.com (Wu)
Subject: Re: More IBM "oversights"
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 01:19:01 GMT
Organization: IBM Austin

wrat@unisql.UUCP (wharfie) writes:

>The xlc compiler is absolutely recalcitrant about accepting
>anything like " Window foo = NULL".  But the X11 headers
>are full of stuff like "XtWindowOfObject(object) != NULL"
>which of course won't compile with the native compiler.  We
>have to sprinkle our code with crap like "#ifdef IBM #undef XtIsRealized"
>and fix it.

>If IBM has a better compiler (I can't believe they compiled X  with
>xlc) can a customer get it?  Or does xlc have an undocumented
>"Stop behaving like turbo pascal" mode?

The xlc compiler is considered to be a fairly good *ANSI* C compiler
(albiet slow). AIXWindows may have some problems with our old header
files not being ansi c compliant, which we inherited from MIT (not an
excuse, we should have fixed it). In this particular case,

	"XtWindowOfObject(object) != NULL"
			should be
	"XtWindowOfObject(object) != None"

This has been fixed in IBM X11R5 release. In the next MIT X release
(X11R6), the entire tree (not just header files) should be ANSI C
compliant and xlc-friendly because MIT is using the xlc compiler and
the AT&T ANSI C compiler to check for ANSI C compliance. The code
changes were actually done 1 year ago, but does not qualify as a bug
and so you will not see this in a MIT Public Patch.

-- 
Eng-Shien Wu (eswu@austin.ibm.com)
IBM Austin, X Server Development
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: tyshen@wang.com (T.Y. Shen)
Subject: test
Organization: Wang Labs, Lowell MA, USA
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 02:01:59 GMT
Summary: Ignore, this is a test
Keywords: test

This is a test.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: jcarr@dbs.com (John Carroll)
Subject: Re: Two srcmstr's running on "console-challenged" systems
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 15:33:34 GMT
Organization: D&B Software, Inc.

We experienced a similiar problem when moving the console from the lab up to my
office on the 5th floor.  The console receives messages very regularly during
the day, and the machine seemed to become really confused when the console
disappeared from tty0.  Anything we tried to do at that point resulted in a
message to the effect, System Resource Controller unable to allocate any more
resources.

After this we've been very careful about performing maintenance or moving the
console.  Now whenever we want to do something of this nature we chcons to a
file in /tmp.  This works fine and saves massive headaches later.  The problem
we experienced was on AIX 3.1.7 and it seems that 3.2.2 handles this situation
a little more gracefully, but don't quote me on that.

John

--
<<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
< DDDDDD     &&&     BBBBBB |John B. Carroll (jcarr@dbs.com)  _/ "If the      >
<  DD  DD   && &&     BB  BB|Dun & Bradstreet Software, Inc._/  thunder don't >
<  DD  DDD   &&&      BBBBB |3445 Peachtree Rd, NE        _/   get you then   >
<  DD  DD   &  && &   BB  BB|Atlanta, GA 30318          _/    the lightnin'   >
< DDDDDD     &&& &   BBBBBB |(404) 239-3466            /     will!  :^)"      >
<<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
From: kraemerf@franvm3.VNET.IBM.COM (Frank Kraemer)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 10:23:08 CET
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re. hostid under AIX
Reply-To: kraemerf@franvm3.VNET.IBM.COM
Organization: IBM Germany, BO-89 ACIS South
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: Usenet 3.0

.

mbl900@anusf.anu.edu.au (Mathew BM LIM) writes:

>I'm need to find a method for "liscencing" software on an AIX system. On
>a Sun I would use hostid to get a unique identifier for the machine I'm on.
>Under AIX, hostid seems to be made from the system's hostname, IP address
>or just a random hex number, so it's easy for someone with root access to
>bypass any access restriction scheme based on hostid.

try '# uname -m' the output is a unique number for every AIX CPU system;

IBM offers a tool to do liscencing - ever heard of RLM (Resouce License
Manager) this tool is also known as HP/Apollo NetLS and was selected from
OSF as part of DME (Distributed Management Environment).

frank :-)








.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
| E-Mail: FRANVM3(KRAEMERF)                 - IBM VNET  "Yes, I'm one  |
| ======  IBMMAIL(DEIBM27S)                 - IBM-Mail   of those      |
|         DE.IBMX400.IBMMAIL.KRAEMER.KRAEME - X.400      stupid IBM    |
|         kraemerf@franvm3.vnet.ibm.com     - Internet   field SE's."  |
| Voice : +49-(0)611/776-364                                           |
| Mail  : Abraham-Lincoln Street 26, 6200 Wiesbaden, Germany           |
'----------------------------------------------------------------------'
From: dwight@geohub.gcn.uoknor.edu (Dwight D. Moore)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: More IBM "oversights"
Date: 14 Dec 92 15:39:59 GMT
Article-I.D.: constell.Bz9A6n.6xq
Reply-To: dwight@geohub.gcn.uoknor.edu
Organization: Geosciences Computing Network, Univ. of Oklahoma
Originator: usenet@kittyhawk.ecn.uoknor.edu

In article <4348@unisql.UUCP>, wrat@unisql.UUCP (wharfie) writes:
|
|>The xlc compiler is absolutely recalcitrant about accepting
|>anything like " Window foo = NULL".  But the X11 headers
|>are full of stuff like "XtWindowOfObject(object) != NULL"
|>which of course won't compile with the native compiler.  We
|>have to sprinkle our code with crap like "#ifdef IBM #undef XtIsRealized"
|>and fix it.
|>
|>If IBM has a better compiler (I can't believe they compiled X  with
|>xlc) can a customer get it?  Or does xlc have an undocumented
|>"Stop behaving like turbo pascal" mode?

A better compiler.? Don't blame
IBM and their compiler for doing its job; you need to understand the
nuances between K & R C, ANSI C, and the other mutations. xlc does
what it is supposed to do. ANSI C has strict  type checking
if the compiler enforces it, which is the default for xlc.
Read the file  /usr/lpp/xlc/bin/README.xlc for more information
on the compiler.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dwight D. Moore
Geosciences Computing Network
University of Oklahoma

dwight@geohub.gcn.uoknor.edu (129.15.40.10)
These opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions of OU or the GCN.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: dpg@MV3600.BMEN.TULANE.EDU
Subject: Printer Driver for NEC LC-890
Reply-To: dpg@MV3600.BMEN.TULANE.EDU
Organization: TULANE, BMEN, NEW ORLEANS, LA
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 23:49:23 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host-[nntpd-20521]: mv3600.bmen.tulane.edu

I need to attach an NEC LC-890 Silentwriter printer to my
RS/6000 Model 350.  I tried to use the driver for an IBM postscript
printer, but it didn't work completely.  Any suggestions?  Please
email me directly if you have worked this out.

Donald Gaver
Dept. of Biomedical Engineering
Tulane University
New Orleans, LA  70188

dpg@bmedpg.bmen.tulane.edu
From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: cannot unmount /usr to run fsck
Date: 17 Dec 1992 14:19:44 GMT
Organization: /etc/organization
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu


In article <BzDJoz.qzw@austin.ibm.com> accapadi@mathew.austin.ibm.com
(Matt Accapadi) writes:
>
> When you boot from the boot/maintenance diskettes and enter
> maintenance mode, enter "getrootfs hdisk0 sh" instead of "getrootfs
> hdisk0" where hdisk0 is the name of the boot disk.  Then run "fsck
> /dev/hd2".

Uh, no.  `getrootfs' mounts /usr.  You need to do `varyonvg -n rootvg'
instead.

-- 
 \  /   Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu
 /\ \   PGP public key available on request.  MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted.
Scheme  White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!
From: tuc@stormking.com (Scott J Ellentuch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: .XSetAuthorization
Date: 13 Dec 92 17:36:56 GMT
Organization: The Telecom Security Group

Hi,

	While updating my X11R5 from PPL14 to PPL15 I started to receive
a warning as such :

0706-224 WARNING:  Duplicate symbol '.XSetAuthorization'.

	when it was "ld"ing my libX11.a file.  Has anyone seen this
and is there a fix?

					Scott

(PS - As I plan to upgrade from 3.1.7 to 3.2.2 soon, are there any 3.2.?
specific patches that I'll need??)
-- 
****************************************************************************
* ---   ---  |Scott J. Ellentuch, Pres  | The Telecom Security Group       *
*  | |__|__  |Consultants and Engineers | P.O. Box 69, Newburgh, NY 12551  *
****************************************************************************
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: woan@exeter.austin.ibm.com (Ronald S. Woan)
Subject: Re: 3004-003 All available login sessions are in use
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 19:33:12 GMT
Organization: Austin School of Hardknocks
Keywords: n

Sounds like you ran into the license limit. If you are entitled
to have more users, bump up the limit with the chlicense command
or go into the system environment settings within smit.
-- 
+-----All Views Expressed Are My Own And Are Not Necessarily Shared By------+
+------------------------------My Employer----------------------------------+
+ Ronald S. Woan                       woan@cactus.org or woan@vnet.ibm.com +
+ other email addresses             Prodigy: XTCR74A Compuserve: 73530,2537 +
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
From: lucien@watson.ibm.com (Lucien Van Elsen)
Subject: Re: filesystem references
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:40:57 GMT
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J Watson Research Center

mcguire@selway.umt.edu (Charles J McGuire) writes:

>   Some time ago, I think I recall some postings on code that would
>   find open references to filesystems. Does anyone recall anything
>   about this?

The program you're looking for is "lsof"; version 2 is the latest, and it's
available for anonymous ftp from j.cc.purdue.edu in pucc/lsof2.tar.Z.

	-Lucien
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lucien Van Elsen                                          IBM  Research
lucien@watson.ibm.com                                     Project Agora