HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: davidf@golem.waterloo.on.ca (David J. Fiander)
Subject: Re: Any easy way to filter this type of UUCP traffic?
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 13:06:42 GMT

According to zeke@fasttech.com (Bohdan Tashchuk):
>In <1992Nov5.165936.13003@igor.tamri.com> jbass@igor.tamri.com (John Bass) writes:
>
>> What starting my bitching last year was uunet's refusal to filter out mail
>> traffic routed thru DMSD. I wanted them to ONLY forward mail with a terminal
>> address at dmsd (dmsd.com). My site was being flooded with a high volume of
>> traffic passing thru UUNET/DMSD link due to automated mail routers ... this
>> depleted my lowvolume account in a couple months. And left me with a
>> several hundred dollar unexpected bill
>
>Does anyone know how the average site can do this?
>

There's nothing anybody else can do to stop uunet from sending
things to John, but Bohdan's problem is much simpler

>I have a similar problem. My fixed price agreement with PSI says I can't pass
>"third party" email thru them. However, when I asked if they could filter it,
>the answer was NO. They put it in the contract, but then don't make it easy
>for you to comply. Fortunately I haven't noticed any traffic yet.
>
>
>	Can smail2.5/sendmail5.65 be configured this way?
>or
>	Can smail3.1.28 be configured this way?

Yes, both can be.  Create a "mailer" which checks the
originator's address and bounces the mail if it's not
authorized to use the link.  If the originator is allowed to
use the link, then just pass it along to uucp as usual.

The problem with this is that if you have multiple UUCP links,
and a message could be sent via a link which avoids PSI,
sendmail and smail won't be able to figure that out for you.
What I do is run MMDF.  It has quite sophisticated facilities
to support the implementation of policy-based routing, so you
would only have to bounce mail for which there is _no_ valid
route, and not all mail which is not permitted to use the best
route.

- David
From: marvit@cattell.psych.upenn.edu (Peter Marvit)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: MH with procmail (instead of slocal)?
Date: 11 Nov 92 03:45:27 GMT
Organization: Psychology Dept, U. Pennsylvania

I'm looking into procmail as the most full-features replacement to
slocal.  I admit to be a bit timid for empirically testing its full
capabilities, however.

Specifically, how can I get procmail to drop unprocessed mail back into
the normal mail drop (/usr/spool/me) rather than filing in some local
folder? That is, the default action of slocal is to put unprocessed mail
(i.e., which doesn't match any previous rule) back into the normal
maildrop so I can "inc" it normally.

Otherwise, procmail looks much more robust and flexible than slocal.

	-Peter "puzzled" Marvit

--
: Peter Marvit <marvit@cattell.psych.upenn.edu>                            :
: Psychology Department,  University of Pennsylvania                       :
: 3815 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA  19104  w:215/898-9208  h:215/387-6433 :
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
From: shobhana@shakti.ncst.ernet.in (Shobhana)
Subject: Incorporating new mail into different folders?
Organization: CMIE, Bombay
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 13:28:42 GMT


Hello--

Please bear with me if this is an FAQ, but is there any way to
incorporate different messages in my maildrop into different folders.
Ideally I should be able to do this based on some regular expression
on, say, the sender's name.

Thanks in advance
Shobhana
--
Shobhana Vyas			shobhana@shakti.ncst.ernet.in
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
From: rc@mithras (Roger Corron)
Subject: Re: MH with procmail (instead of slocal)?
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 02:41:49 GMT

The environment variable DEFAULT controls which maildrop receives
unprocessed mail.Simply set DEFAULT=/usr/spool/me in your .procmailrc.

I've been using procmail for a couple of months. No problems. Good
results.

Roger Corron	The usual disclaimers apply
rc@sgi.com


Peter Marvit (marvit@cattell.psych.upenn.edu) wrote:
: I'm looking into procmail as the most full-features replacement to
: slocal.  I admit to be a bit timid for empirically testing its full
: capabilities, however.
: 
: Specifically, how can I get procmail to drop unprocessed mail back into
: the normal mail drop (/usr/spool/me) rather than filing in some local
: folder? That is, the default action of slocal is to put unprocessed mail
: (i.e., which doesn't match any previous rule) back into the normal
: maildrop so I can "inc" it normally.
: 
: Otherwise, procmail looks much more robust and flexible than slocal.
: 
: 	-Peter "puzzled" Marvit
: 
: --
: : Peter Marvit <marvit@cattell.psych.upenn.edu>                            :
: : Psychology Department,  University of Pennsylvania                       :
: : 3815 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA  19104  w:215/898-9208  h:215/387-6433 :
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
From: notarus@uiuc.edu (Mark Notarus)
Subject: Re: MH with procmail (instead of slocal)?
Reply-To: notarus@uiuc.edu (Mark Notarus)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 19:04:19 GMT

marvit@cattell.psych.upenn.edu (Peter Marvit) writes:

}I'm looking into procmail as the most full-features replacement to
}slocal.  I admit to be a bit timid for empirically testing its full
}capabilities, however.


 I've got a running war going with a friend of mine, Josh laff...
smiley@uiuc.edu

  He says procmail is more robust than mhook is, i say that mhook i s
more configuarble, and my scripts do everything his program does. I think
what it comes down to is, do you want a program that does it all for you
or that you can write simple additions to?

 Anyway, my friends and i have given both mhook and procmail some
truly intensive workloads...some weeks, we send as much as 3000 pieces of
mail between six friends, and *grin* procmail bogs down more often than
mhook does. However, both are darn stable...
 
 If you're really interested in it, i suggest mailing smiley@uiuc.edu and
ask him. He's written some interesting stuff for it.


 mark
-- 
These are my opinions. These are only my opinions. If this had been a real
honest-to-george CCSO opinion, it would have had someone else's name on it.
From: jsweet@irvine.com (Jerry Sweet)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: finding the MH lib directory
Date: 12 Nov 92 10:37:25 GMT
Organization: Irvine Compiler Corp., Irvine, California, USA

Is there a way to make mhpath cough up the path to the MH library
directory?

You might ask: why does he want that?

The answer: I want to invoke ap and dp from external scripts.
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
From: janet@cs.uwa.oz.au (Janet Jackson)
Subject: Re: Incorporating new mail into different folders?
Organization: Dept. Computer Science, University of Western Australia.
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 04:38:09 GMT

In <BxAqrv.603@shakti.ncst.ernet.in> shobhana@shakti.ncst.ernet.in (Shobhana) writes:

> is there any way to
> incorporate different messages in my maildrop into different folders.

I do it using MH's pick(1) command.

I don't use inbox at all.  I have a folder In-<kind> for each kind of mail,
and In-misc for the leftovers.  (You could use inbox instead of In-misc,
but using In-misc keeps all the In- folders together on my xmh display.)

I have a replacement inc script.  It calls MH's inc(1) to incorporate mail
into In-misc, then refile(1) it into the other In- folders.
It then tells me how many messages are in each In- folder.

By calling it "inc" and putting it before MH's inc in your path, you can
get xmh to use it instead of MH's inc.

Here's a shar (I've taken out most "refile" lines, leaving two examples).

Janet Jackson
<janet@cs.uwa.edu.au>
Department of Computer Science
The University of Western Australia

--->cut here<---
#! /bin/sh
# This is a shell archive, meaning:
# 1. Remove everything above the #! /bin/sh line.
# 2. Save the resulting text in a file.
# 3. Execute the file with /bin/sh (not csh) to create the files:
#	inc
# This archive created: Tue Nov 10 12:43:37 1992
export PATH; PATH=/bin:$PATH
echo shar: extracting "'inc'" '(648 characters)'
if test -f 'inc'
then
	echo shar: will not over-write existing file "'inc'"
else
sed 's/^X//' << \SHAR_EOF > 'inc'
X#!/bin/sh
X#
X# inc - Janet's personal inc to replace mh's standard inc
X#
X# Janet Jackson 1992-1-22
X#
X# This splits mail into various "In-" folders so I can look at each sort of
X# mail in one go
X
XPATH=/usr/local/mh:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/ucb:/usr/local/bin
Xexport PATH
X
Xif inc +In-misc -silent; then		# if there was any new mail
X	folder +In-misc >/dev/null 2>&1	# make sure we're in right folder
X	refile +In-isoc `pick -to isoc-dist -o -cc isoc-dist -o -to isoc-interest -o -cc isoc-interest 2>/dev/null` >/dev/null 2>&1
X	refile +In-softmanagers `pick -to soft-managers -o -cc soft-managers 2>/dev/null` >/dev/null 2>&1
X	folders | egrep '^[     ]*In'
Xfi
SHAR_EOF
if test 648 -ne "`wc -c < 'inc'`"
then
	echo shar: error transmitting "'inc'" '(should have been 648 characters)'
fi
chmod +x 'inc'
fi # end of overwriting check
#	End of shell archive
exit 0
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
From: jrh@jrh.uucp (James R. Hamilton)
Subject: Compact Folders Display
Organization: private system, Toronto, Ontario
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 02:39:22 GMT

    On some of my accounts I have more MH folders than fit on a screen
    at one time.  I like to be able to see them all at once so I've
    written a small program that displays 4 on a line in the following
    format:

                  folder:x>y

    where "folder" is the folder name, x is the number of messages in
    the folder and y is the current message number.  If folder is the
    current folder then it has a trailing "+" sign.  Some example output:


archive:0	    bdb:32>5		code:24>18	    db:1>?
drafts:0	    eval:13>9		faq:28>20	    inbox+:1>?
jrh:3>?		    logan:33>31		mh:8>7		    notes:13>5
ora:7>?		    outbox:29>19	rbaker:3>3	    uworld:3>1

    The program:

#!/bin/sh
#---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#
#			FILE:	mhfolders
#			Author:	James R. Hamilton
#			Date:	92.10.04 @ 20:27:38
#
# USAGE: mhfolders
#
# DESCRIPTION: Prints out list of mhfolders and the number of messages in
#              in each in a compact 4 column format.
#
# COMMENTS/FIXES TO: James Hamilton <jrh@jrh.gts.org>
#---------------------------------------------------------------------------

AWK=/bin/awk				# Set to awk command on system.
PR=/bin/pr				# Set to pr command on system.
FOLDERS=/usr/local/bin/folders		# set to folders command on system.

$FOLDERS $@ |
    $AWK '
	/^$/ { 				# Stop at first blank line.
	    exit
	};
	NR > 1 {			# Skip first line.
	    if ($3 !~ /no/)		# If empty, print 0.
		if (length($9) > 0)	# Is there a current msg in the folder?
		    printf "%s:%s>%s\n", $1, $3, substr($9,0,length($9)-1);
		else
		    printf "%s:%s>?\n", $1, $3;
	    else			# Not empty, print size.
		printf "%s:0\n", $1;
	}
    ' | $PR -4 -w80 -l1			# Format output into 4 columns.

#
#------------------------------> End of File <------------------------------
-- 

James R. Hamilton                              inet: jrh@jrh.gts.org
telephone: +1 416 493 4162                     uunet: ...!uunet!jrh!jrh
Toronto, Canada                                work: jrh@torolab6.vnet.ibm.com
Xref: sparky comp.mail.mh:1274 comp.unix.ultrix:8229 comp.sys.dec:5880
From: putsch@uicc.com (Jeff Putsch)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh,comp.unix.ultrix,comp.sys.dec
Subject: DecWindows DxMail/MOTIF and MH-6.7.2/MIME...
Summary: dxmail is handing send a '-wait' option
Keywords: dxmail mh send
Date: 10 Nov 92 23:11:44 GMT
Organization: Unitrode Integrated Circuits Corp., Merrimack, NH, USA

Howdy,

I have used MH/MIME with DecWindows dxmail, DEC's xmh-like interface
to MH, (prior to the MOTIF version of DecWindows) without problem, BUT
in DecWindows/Motif dxmail insists on handing send a '-wait' option. I
have RTFM'D the DEC docs, the MH docs, and the MH source, but I cannot
find the -wait option (it's definately not in the MH source). My
questions are:

1 - What does the -wait option do?
2 - How does one get dxmail (in DecWindows MOTIF) to stop using it?
3 - Does anyone know where DEC documents their 'enhancements' to MH?
4 - Along with Q3, does anyone know of other options/enhancement to MH
    that DEC made I might like to know about? For example, what are
    -mts and -note (see send -help output below)?

If it is of any interest, the two send versions spit out the following
for 'send -help'

DEC's MH send:
syntax: send [file] [switches]
  switches are:
  -alias aliasfile
  -draft
  -(draftf)older +folder
  -(draftm)essage msg
  -nodraftfolder
  -filter filterfile
  -nofilter
  -[no]format
  -[no]forward
  -[no]msgid
  -[no]push
  -[no]verbose
  -[no]watch
  -width columns
  -(help)
  -[no]wait
  -mts smtp/x400
  -note

version: MH 6.7.1 #44[UCI] (bsdbld.zko.dec.com) of Fri Jul 24 13:20:11 EDT 1992
options: [ISI] [MHRC] [WHATNOW] [MHE] [BSD42] [BERK] [NETWORK] [BIND]
         [RPATHS] [DPOP] [RPOP] [FOLDPROT='"0700"'] [MSGPROT='"0600"']
         [TYPESIG='void'] [POPSERVICE='"pop"'] [SPRINTF='int'] [SENDMTS]
         [SMTP] [POP] [X400]

MH-6.7.2/MIME send:
syntax: send [file] [switches]
  switches are:
  -alias aliasfile
  -draft
  -(draftf)older +folder
  -(draftm)essage msg
  -nodraftfolder
  -filter filterfile
  -nofilter
  -[no]format
  -[no]forward
  -[no]mime
  -[no]msgid
  -[no]push
  -split seconds
  -[no]verbose
  -[no]watch
  -width columns
  -(help)

version: MH 6.7.2 #9[UCI] (chillon.uicc.com) of Tue Nov 10 08:38:26 EST 1992
options: [BERK] [BIND] [BPOP] [BSD42] [DPOP] [FOLDPROT='"0700"'] [ISI]
         [MHE] [MHRC] [MSGPROT='"0600"'] [NETWORK] [NNTP] [POP]
         [POPSERVICE='"pop"'] [RPATHS] [RPOP] [SENDMTS] [SMTP]
         [TYPESIG='void'] [WHATNOW] [X400]


Thanks, in advance, for any help I receive.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Putsch                          |  Internet: putsch@uicc.com
Unitrode Integrated Circuits Corp.   |  
Merrimack, NH  USA                   |  Voice   : (US) 603-429-8626 (daytime)
From: pete@egh-qc.uucp (Pete Phillips)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: problems getting the bitmap for an xmh icon
Date: 13 Nov 92 09:21:18 GMT
Organization: Surgical Materials Testing Lab (SMTL)



I am trying to get xmh to use the 

	Xmh*newMailIconBitmap*: 
and
	Xmh*noMailIconBitmap*:  
resources in my .Xdefaults file.

I have the following 2 lines in my .Xdefaults:

Xmh*newMailIconBitmap*: /usr/include/X11/bitmaps/letters
Xmh*noMailIconBitmap*:  /usr/include/X11/bitmaps/noletters

and when I run xmh with the -flag option, I just get the standard
Xtool icon.  

I'm running 

- X11R5, 
- xmh for X11R5, 
- olvwm (Xview2 version)
- on a Sun SLC with SunOs 4.1.1.B.
- xmh has been patched to use metamail.

Anyone got any ideas how to get these icons to work to
indicate new mail ?

Pete
-- 
Pete Phillips, Surgical Materials Testing Lab, Bridgend, S. Wales.
UUCP   :  uknet!egh-qc!pete            DOMAIN :  pete@egh-qc.co.uk
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"SCIENCE: A way of finding things out and then making them work.  
Science explains what is happening around us the whole time.
So does RELIGION, but science is better because it comes up with 
more understand able excuses when its wrong. There is a lot more 
science than you think."
From: rab@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au (Duty Programmer)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: Re: Incorporating new mail into different folders?
Date: 12 Nov 1992 13:56:54 +1100
Organization: School of Physics, University of Melbourne
Distribution: world
Reply-To: rab@tauon.ph.unimelb.EDU.AU
NNTP-Posting-Host: ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au


In article <janet.721370289@dunnart>, janet@cs.uwa.oz.au (Janet Jackson) writes:
|> In <BxAqrv.603@shakti.ncst.ernet.in> shobhana@shakti.ncst.ernet.in (Shobhana) writes:
|> 
|> > is there any way to
|> > incorporate different messages in my maildrop into different folders.
|> 
|> I do it using MH's pick(1) command.
|> 

All very nice, but you don't need to rewrite any MH commands to do this: MH
can do it for you if you set up .forward and ./maildelivery files. Look at the
man page for mhook for more details.

I'm on several mailing lists and i use this method to sort everything into
different folders. I did, however, need to write a simple script to do a
"scan unseen" on all of my folders at login time, but this is trivial.

rab
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Brown                     | E-mail: rab@tauon.ph.unimelb.EDU.AU
School of Physics                 | Phone : +61 3 344 5081
University of Melbourne           | Fax   : +61 3 347 4783
Parkville Victoria AUSTRALIA 3052 | Telex : AA35185
From: sfleming@cs.hw.ac.uk (Stewart T Fleming)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: MH for HESIOD and Kerberos
Date: 13 Nov 92 10:52:49 GMT
Reply-To: sfleming@cs.hw.ac.uk
Organization: Dept. Of Computing and Electrical Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh


I'm involved with a project working with DECAthena network management
software.  We want to install MH 6.7.2 with MIME extensions to work
with Hesiod and Kerberos in the standard system setup.  I have patched
MH 6.7.2 with the MIME patches from gatekeeper; this installation works
fine on our Sun and DEcstation installations outside of Athena.

I have the patches "mh.kerberos" from /pub/mail/ua/mh on gatekeeper.dec.com
which appear to be what I need.  However, in the patched "inc.c" and "msg.c"
files, there is a structure and a function referenced which are not in
the patched distribution or standard system libraries.  These are :

	struct hes_postoffice
and	struct hes_postoffice *hes_postoffice(char *)

I guess that the function calls hes_resolve to retrieve the mail host
for the user.  The two components of hes_postoffice which are used are :

	char **po_host, *po_type; /* ??? */

There doesn't seem to be any documentation for these patches.
Two questions :

	1.  Where did the Kerberos patches come from ?
	2.  Do I have to roll my own hes_postoffice function ?

I don't think it is difficult to write the appropriate function, but I'd
rather not if has been done already.  We have Athena v1.0A.

Thanks for any help,
STF
--
sfleming@cee.hw.ac.uk, sfleming@icbl.hw.ac.uk
"...maybe we could do something else.
   Mrs Robinson, would you like to go to a movie ?" --The Graduate
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: andy@homebase.vistachrome.com (Andy Finkenstadt)
Subject: Re: genie gateway
Reply-To: andy@homebase.vistachrome.com
Organization: Vista-Chrome Incorporated
Distribution: comp
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 14:23:09 GMT

GEnie gateway was reduced in cost from a monthly subscription
fee to a one-time registration fee basis, and the outgoing
per item charge reduced 25% based on what, for my work system
is the 90% rule, and instituted a per-item incoming charge.

Summary details can be found in the most recent Internet Mail Guide
when it comes out, and on genie page 207 (the "Internet mail" page)
under the "Rates" section.

-Andy

[someone else wrote]
>PA>Is there a method to someone on GEnie via internet? Please email
>PA>to me if you can help. Thanks for any help.

"larry koester" <larry.koester@execnet.com> writes:
>LEON R. LUTZ
>    While Genie now has an Internet Gateway, only those subscribers who
>    actually subscribe to this extra cost service are actually given an
>    internet postbox.  So if, for instance, you tried to send mail to me
>    at Genie via internet, it would just bounce.  For while I am a
>    Genie Subscriber, they want too much for such an additional service.
>    Larry
>    Bloomer, WI
>---
>Executive Network Information System  (914) 667-4567
>International ILink Host
-- 
Andrew Finkenstadt, Vista-Chrome, Inc., Homes & Land Publishing Corporation
GEnie Unix RoundTable Manager, andy@vistachrome.com, andy@genie.geis.com.
  Join GEnie, call 800-638-9636/301-251-6415.  Join Unix, CASE, and Desktop 
  Oracle RDBMS Database discussions, send mail to ora-request@vistachrome.com
From: mcdonald@dallas.sil.org
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: All-in-1 mail, POPMail
Date: 11 Nov 92 17:08:00 CST
Organization: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Dallas Center

In article <1992Nov11.154720.28785@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca>, cmcneil@mta.ca (Chris McNeil) writes:
> I don't know if this is the right place for this question but if it is
> not could someone please direct me to a better place to post it.
> 
> We are currently using popmail ( POPMail, Eudora, NUPOP as clients) on
> our campus as our mail solution for PC's and like it very much. We are a
> a DEC site and Dec is trying to get us to switch to all-in-1 mail. Can
> anyone that has used the above comment on it.

We are using MAILworks (aka Allin1 MAIL for xxx) and like it very much.  It
runs on our MACs, PC's, dumb terminals, and X terminals, so anyone can move
between platforms and still get at his mail. 

> 
>  I like POP mail due to the fact that it is TCP based, enclosures are
> fairly standard (ie lots of sites in the world can handle binhexed
> enclosures), is free and is simple (ie no SMTP gateway as are required in
> non TCP based mail systems).

The license for MAILworks comes with Pathworks, so if you have pathworks,
you have Mailworks.  If you can fall under the CSLG as an educational
institution you can get the VT client and the DECW client under that
program.

It does handle arbitrary binary attachments.  We also have purchased PMDF from
Innosoft (SALES@INNOSOFT.COM) which allows us to pass binary attachments to
the Internet in MIME format.  We also have an internal X.400 network that
we can pass binaries over.  All in all, we like it.

******************************************************************************
Dan McDonald                    * UUCP      ...utacfd!dalsil!mcdonald
Dallas Computer Services	* Internet  mcdonald@dallas.sil.org
Summer Institute of Linguistics * ATTmail   sil!mcdonald
7500 W Camp Wisdom Rd           * SILnet    MCDONALD@AM@DALLAS
Dallas, TX 75236                * FAXnet    (214)709-3387
USA                             * POTSnet   (214)709-3389
******************************************************************************
x.400: C=US; ADMD=WESTERN UNION; O=SIL; DDA.ELN=62897168
      include "VMS MAIL: DAN.MCDONALD" in text for automated delivery :-(
******************************************************************************
From: dboyes@is.rice.edu (David E Boyes)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: Email access to IBM PROFS network
Keywords: IBM, PROFS, Internet, UUCP
Date: 7 Nov 92 04:56:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: rice.BxBxpr.4zB
Distribution: usa
Organization: Rice University

In article <1992Nov6.220748.2965@fico.uucp> agh@fico.UUCP (PUT YOUR NAME HERE) writes:
>I need some assistance in sending mail from my UNIX system in house to
>a customer's PROFS system.  Does Internet have a gateway to IBM's
>network for PROFS mail?  

PROFS is a program, not a network. Lots of people have PROFS (or
Officevision, the Son of PROFS).

>I do know the IBM node name and the user name.  Do I use IBM.com or 
>vnet.ibm.com?  Is there something else I should try?

If the person works directly for IBM, then you should ascertain:

  1) Do they have external mail access? Not all IBMers do,
     although it's a relatively simple process (get a form from
     the TOOLS disk, get their manager to send it to the outside
     gateway admin). If they do have outside access, try
     <user>@<hostname>.vnet.ibm.com. 

  2) If the customer is attached to IIN (IBM's global X.25/SNA
     based network that they sell access to customers), try
     userid@host.iinus1.ibm.com. 

Otherwise, you need to contact the company directly and ask about
external connections.




-- 
David Boyes
dboyes@rice.edu