HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: flloyd@l1-a.West.Sun.COM (Fred Lloyd [Phoenix SE])
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: 430mhz band under th
Date: 5 Jan 1993 22:45:06 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Phoenix, AZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-a.west.sun.com

In article <1993Jan5.170932.18381@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.UUCP (Gary Coffman) writes:
>In article <1993Jan04.042255.17643@ssc.com> tad@ssc.com (Tad Cook) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan2.133936.1@ttd.teradyne.com> rice@ttd.teradyne.com writes:
>>>Read what I wrote. You don't HAVE to DO anything. But if you don't want 
>>>the station to be repeated, you have the right to not do so.
>>>
>>
>
>Coordination is a *voluntary* cooperative effort among repeater
>owners to minimize mutual interference. Coordinators have *no*
>legal standing to assign frequencies, in fact exclusive frequency
>assignments are specifically prohibited by 97.101(b) "No frequency
>will be assigned for the exclusive use of any station." Coordinators
>can only *recommend* frequencies to be used by stations in repeater
>operation.
>

True.  Case in point:  If you find a frequency which is not
occupied and put up a repeater on it, and then the coordinating body
says "You can't do that!", you can tell them to take a hike.  They
have to demonstrate that you're interfering before there's any 
case.  And even then, they have to cooperate with you.  

Needless to say, you may be right but you may not win any friends
along the way.

-fred

-- 
[ Fred Lloyd, AA7BQ                             Fred.Lloyd@West.Sun.COM ]
[ Sun Microsystems,           Southwest Area Solaris Transition Manager ]
[ Phoenix, AZ                                            (602) 275-4242 ]
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: aaa33750@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Arnett)
Subject: License time 10/18->1/4
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 18:32:49 GMT

A local testing session on Oct. 18 turned up licenses on Jan. 4.
Just thought I'd throw another number out after seeing a few
posts saying anything from 8 to 12+ weeks.  Note that this was both
new licenses (including a 1 day extra) as well as upgrades (such as
myself).

73 es have patience!
Drew  kb9fko
arnett@uiuc.edu
From: taber@cimfie.enet.dec.com (PStJTT)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: 1200Mhz is not a microwave band!
Date: 5 Jan 93 21:36:24 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation


In article <1993Jan5.045146.1268@samba.oit.unc.edu>, Kirk.Smith@launchpad.unc.edu (Kirk Smith) writes...
>I've wondered about keeping the antenna away from the head when Txing
>on a handheld.  I have yet to see a handheld with a tower and the
>antenna at the top of the tower.  Simply by talking into the HT,
>the antenna is going to be fairly close to your head.  A remote
>mike (ie: speaker-mic) usually means you're putting the RF into
>your kidneys (ie: radio on the belt), which I guess is less harmful
>than the brain, but it seems relative.
> 

If you look a little closer, you'll notice an interesting thing: 1.2GHz 
handhelds are all low power -- I think about one watt.  With a typical
ham rig, you listen a lot and talk a little, so overall, your exposure
is limited. Handheld cell phones are much lower power, but they radiate 
all the time you're talking on them. What I'm driving at is: I think 
someone thought of the effects of UHF on the operator when the rigs were 
being designed.

Of course, creative hams can overcome these impediments and harm 
themselves.  But most won't take the initiative.  *sigh*  Kids these 
days....

>>>==>PStJTT
From: johnr@agnostic.UUCP
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Info-Hams Digest V93 #35
Date: 8 Jan 93 15:03:05 GMT
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

subsubscribe me
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: tkelso@afit.af.mil (TS Kelso)
Subject: Two-Line Orbital Element Set Format
Keywords: Satellite, Orbital Elements, Keplerian, Format
Organization: Air Force Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 23:14:02 GMT

As a service to the satellite user community, the following description of the
NORAD two-line orbital element set format is uploaded to sci.space.news and
rec.radio.amateur.misc on a monthly basis.  The most current orbital elements
from the NORAD two-line element sets are carried on the Celestial BBS, (513)
427-0674, and are updated daily (when possible).  Documentation and tracking
software are also available on this system.  The Celestial BBS may be accessed
24 hours/day at 300, 1200, 2400, 4800, or 9600 bps using 8 data bits, 1 stop
bit, no parity.  In addition, element sets (also updated daily) and some
documentation and software are also available via anonymous ftp from
archive.afit.af.mil (129.92.1.66) in the directory pub/space.

==============================================================================

Data for each satellite consists of three lines in the following format:

AAAAAAAAAAA
1 NNNNNU NNNNNAAA NNNNN.NNNNNNNN +.NNNNNNNN +NNNNN-N +NNNNN-N N NNNNN
2 NNNNN NNN.NNNN NNN.NNNN NNNNNNN NNN.NNNN NNN.NNNN NN.NNNNNNNNNNNNNN

Line 0 is a eleven-character name.

Lines 1 and 2 are the standard Two-Line Orbital Element Set Format identical
to that used by NORAD and NASA.  The format description is:

Line 1
Column     Description
 01-01     Line Number of Element Data
 03-07     Satellite Number
 10-11     International Designator (Last two digits of launch year)
 12-14     International Designator (Launch number of the year)
 15-17     International Designator (Piece of launch)
 19-20     Epoch Year (Last two digits of year)
 21-32     Epoch (Julian Day and fractional portion of the day)
 34-43     First Time Derivative of the Mean Motion
        or Ballistic Coefficient (Depending on ephemeris type)
 45-52     Second Time Derivative of Mean Motion (decimal point assumed;
           blank if N/A)
 54-61     BSTAR drag term if GP4 general perturbation theory was used.
           Otherwise, radiation pressure coefficient.  (Decimal point assumed)
 63-63     Ephemeris type
 65-68     Element number
 69-69     Check Sum (Modulo 10)
           (Letters, blanks, periods, plus signs = 0; minus signs = 1)

Line 2
Column     Description
 01-01     Line Number of Element Data
 03-07     Satellite Number
 09-16     Inclination [Degrees]
 18-25     Right Ascension of the Ascending Node [Degrees]
 27-33     Eccentricity (decimal point assumed)
 35-42     Argument of Perigee [Degrees]
 44-51     Mean Anomaly [Degrees]
 53-63     Mean Motion [Revs per day]
 64-68     Revolution number at epoch [Revs]
 69-69     Check Sum (Modulo 10)

All other columns are blank or fixed.

Example:

NOAA 6
1 11416U          86 50.28438588 0.00000140           67960-4 0  5293
2 11416  98.5105  69.3305 0012788  63.2828 296.9658 14.24899292346978
-- 
Dr TS Kelso                           Assistant Professor of Space Operations
tkelso@afit.af.mil                    Air Force Institute of Technology
From: wdh@oversteer.Eng.Sun.COM (Dennis Henderson)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: Ringo Ranger II performance
Date: 12 Jan 1993 00:02:50 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: wdh@oversteer.Eng.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: oversteer

The Ringo Ranger II performed much better than a Jpole for me.   I replace 
a Jpole with a RR-II using the same mast and coax.  Repeaters that were not 
workable with the Jpole became reliably workable with the RR-II. 

The jpole was the American Legion unit which is popular in No Cal and well built.   

I am glad I made the switch. 

...Dennis Henderson, N6TTW, 146.535

ps:  I can't comment on ruggedness in harsh winters.  I live in California.  
No problems in 1.5 yrs.
From: stoll@ocf.berkeley.edu (Cliff Stoll)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Stalking the Wily Hacker -- talk at Dayton Hamvention
Date: 11 Jan 93 09:31:18 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

Hi Gang,

Several hams have asked me about speaking at Dayton;
here's the scoop:  Yes, I've volunteered to speak at the
Dayton Hamvention on Saturday April 24, after dinner.

For more info, don't write me; contact the Dayton Hamvention folks.


abstract:  STALKING THE WILY HACKER
           Cliff Stoll  K7TA

Someone breaks into your computer.  What do you do?
Slam the door?  Call the police?  Ignore the problem?

When a German hacker broke into our lab, we decided to
silently watch him and quietly track him back.  For a year,
we watched as he broke into over forty military computers around the world.
Turned out that he was spy, passing information to the Soviet KGB.

I used the same skills to catch this hacker that you find in
vhf rabbit hunts: direction finding, stealth, and luck.

What techniques did this guy use to crack into computers?  Where
are the holes in our systems?  How do you trace someone
hiding in the worldwide computer networks?  Who was willing
to help -- and who wasn't?

My talk, "Stalking the Wily Hacker" will address these
questions.  I guarantee a fun time for all.

The Cuckoo's Egg, the book describing this incident, is on
sale at most good bookstores, and all not-so-good bookstores.
This book tells the true story of tracking a spy through the
maze of computer espionage.


Cliff Stoll graduated from Buffalo Public School #61 with a blue
star for good attendence.  Later, he repaired pinball
machines, printed T-shirts, and received a PhD in planetary science.
Cliff has appeard on the PBS/NOVA documentary,
"The KGB, the CIA, the Computer and Me".  In his spare time,
Cliff pieces quilts, works 40 meter CW, and squeezes lumps of
bituminous coal into diamonds.

There are two spelling mistakes in this announcement.
From: n1mpq@anomaly.sbs.risc.net
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Yaesu FT-5100 Help
Date: 7 Jan 93 23:53:47 GMT


 
Organization: Small Business Systems, Incorporated, Smithfield, RI 02917
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 22:16:14 GMT

I just got a new Yaesu FT-5100 and was wondering why in all the ads for
it Yaesu says it has cross-band repeat built in but there's no mention
of it whatsoever. Weird stuff. Anyone know anything about this?


Tony
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: RSUMPERL@JAGUAR.ESS.HARRIS.COM (05991 SUMPERL RP)
Subject: GRC-14 surplus
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 18:51:26 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24
Organization: Harris Information Systems Division

Greetings all....
  Can anyone email me or post some info on military surplus GRC-14's.

                               Thanks,
                                 Ray
From: chuck@eng.umd.edu (Chuck Harris - WA3UQV)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: [ANS] Re: [FWD] End fed 1/4 wave 80 meter antenna
Date: 5 Jan 93 19:44:55 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland, Department of Electrical Engineering

In article <9301032036.AA29051@tecnet1.jcte.jcs.mil> jdelancy@tecnet1.jcte.jcs.mil writes:
>Ok.  But you forget one thing,  I never said use copper sulphate
>or other chemicals,  I said rock salt.

Since, you want to make my letter public, I will reply in public.

My follow-up posting to your letter was a general warning to others that
chemical grounding systems have a strong potential to pollute the ground
water.  Rock salt is not as bad as Copper Sulfate, or liquid fertilizer, but
it is also not harmless; salt water is not potable!

The private letter below was sent to you in response to your flippant posting
about wells being in close proximity to septic systems.

>
>>
>>Bio wastes are easily handled by the critters that live in the soil.  It is
>>a well known fact that 3 feet of fairly normal soil will provide all of the
>>filtration needed to clean up any kind of output from your septic tank to 
...
>>Chemical wastes and poisons are an entirely different matter.  They generally
>>are in much higher concentrations than would occur in nature.  Normal soil
>>microbes cannot break down many toxic chemicals into harmless products.  As a
...


73,

Chuck Harris - WA3UQV
chuck@eng.umd.edu
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: julian@bongo.tele.com (Julian Macassey)
Subject: Re: [ANS] Re: [FWD] End fed 1/4 wave 80 meter antenna
Organization: Xenon Systems News n Mail, Hollywood
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 03:51:35 GMT

In article <1993Jan05.194455.16996@eng.umd.edu> chuck@eng.umd.edu (Chuck Harris - WA3UQV) writes:
>In article <9301032036.AA29051@tecnet1.jcte.jcs.mil> jdelancy@tecnet1.jcte.jcs.mil writes:
>>Ok.  But you forget one thing,  I never said use copper sulphate
>>or other chemicals,  I said rock salt.

	OK, here is another possible chemical. Epsom Salts (Magnesium
Sulphate). If it gets into your well water, you will notice the
effects and they will tend to make the septic tank overflow.

	I reccommend Epsom Salts if you really want to flush out the
DX. 

-- 
Julian Macassey at bongo. julian@bongo.tele.com Voice: (213) 653-4495
Paper Mail: 742 1/2 North Hayworth Avenue, Hollywood, California 90046-7142
From: plaws@uafhp.uark.edu (Peter Laws)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: TS-140 OR IC-728 OR FT-747GX ??
Date: 5 Jan 1993 15:35:44 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


My wife (KB5TFX) is in Belize doing field research.  We are going to set
up an HF station there.  I need net.opinions on the above.  Criteria:

<$1000 (<$800 better...8-))
Fairly small, light weight 
Lowest possible current draw (solar/batteries only option)
But not QRP (the cycle is going *down*...)


Also need opinions on AEA IsoLoop:  Does it really work??  Got good
reviews in 73 and QST.  But, does it really work ??  It looks *so* small! 
I  would get a GR5V (GV5R? G5RV??)  dipole but the IsoLoop looks so simple
to set up...(BTW, she is *quite* capable of setting up a dipole, thank you!)


Email preferred, but posting OK.  (bandwidth costs *some* people
money...not me, but some...)

Thanks in advance

Peter Laws|GEnie:P.LAWS1|"The '90s are gonna make the '60s|plaws@uafhp.uark.edu
n5uwy@ka5bml.ar.usa.noam| look like the '50s"  --D. Hopper|plaws@uafsysb.bitnet


Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: jeffj@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (jeffrey.n.jones)
Subject: Re: QSL cards from SWLers (was Re: Ham transmissions-a hypot
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 15:53:51 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.020947.11062@abo.fi> MSUORANTA@FINABO.ABO.FI (Mika Suoranta Tkkk) writes:
>In <1icp0aINNmiv@transfer.stratus.com> fms@sw.stratus.com writes:
>
>	Most hams don't bother to QSL swl-cards, but remember that 
>	every swl-listener is a potential new ham. Some reception
>	reports have been useful, for example when I was testing my
>	very first homemade QRP-rig I couldn't make any QSO's for
>	weeks, but one UA1-station had heard me CQing and sent a card.

I would be ecstatic to receive to a SWL-card from anyone that listened
to me and would QSL without a second thought! Maybe give them some
encouragement to become a ham! I remember listening to pair of hams
in high school on a Drake receiver and I think I sent a letter asking
for a QSL card from one of them. Never got it though...

73!

Jeff

-- 
 Jeff Jones  AB6MB         | Hooker        : I'll do anything for $50! 
 jeffj@seeker.mystic.com   | Henny Youngman: Will you paint my house?
 Infolinc BBS 415-778-5929 |
From: rc@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov (Robert Carpenter)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: [Re:] Microwave Ovens as Transmitters
Date: 6 Jan 93 13:03:24 GMT
Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology
	formerly National Bureau of Standards
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu


Regarding the conjecture about using microwave ovens, or their components,
as 2400 MHz ham transmitters:
It seems to me that Chip Angle, N6CA, did this some years ago. Apparently
injection-locked the magnetron to get usable stability.  I suppose that
Chip also used a good DC supply.  Contact Chip for more info. He sometimes
runs ads as "Angle Linear".

73,  Bob  W3OTC
From: phantom@pro-haven.cts.com (Tiffany Keller)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Re: License delays
Date: 9 Jan 1993 06:27:34 -0600
Organization: ProLine [pro-haven] - Pariahs' Haven BBS, 409/846-3177, 9600-300
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

In <9301071442.AA22065@ucsd.edu>
William=E.=Newkirk%Pubs%GenAv.Mlb@ns14.cca.CR.rockwell.COM writes:

% >        More likely be W5YI *and* the ARRL.....I took my upgrade with the
% >ARRL and to date, it has been almost 12 weeks now.....for an UPGRADE!!!
% >ARRRRGGHHHHH!!! ;-)  I've called the FCC and if you think Mr. W5YI himself is
% >rude, you might get a real kick talking to these idiots.....
% 
% the ARRL/VEC folks can defend themselves on whether or not they sell names and 
% addresses of newly minted hams.  I believe the answer will be NO from the VEC.
% 
% Probably the style of answer you get is a function of how you pose the 
% question.  and i can imagine people getting pretty short when you have a day 
% full of obnoxious, selfish questioners calling in......
% 
        Hey....they should be happy to *have* a job.....If they don't like
it, they know where the door is.  If I wasn't struggling to pay for my own
education and going to school, I'd take their job in a heartbeat!  At least
they get better paid than I do.....

% i dunno if telling the truth makes it an "excuse".  Could be there was 
% something with *your* session that caused a delay.

        Doubtful.....I think I'll pose that question to my local ve team
around here and get their response to that...


% the other guy lives a charmed life.  or the FCC is holding yours up for a 
% Really Good Call Sign (not!).

        At least my call is shorter than yours is.....Smart ***.....

% >        Don't get me wrong, I really am happy for the guy bein' a new ham and
% >all, but 12 weeks is just a tad excessive.....It should not be taking this
% >long.....
% 
% if anything we want the delays to be longer.  this indicates a sustained 
                                       ^^^^^^  --NOT!

% growth in the amateur service and would demand the commission add additional 
% staffing to process the larger numbers of applications.
% 
% Probably we need to work on moving the prime time for amateur radio classes 
% from the Fall to the Spring.  Miss the christmas vacation holes that way.
% 
% 73, bill wb9ivr


T. Keller  kj5gu

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Internet:  phantom@pro-haven.cts.com           KJ5GU/AE       
UUCP:      crash!pro-haven!phantom             Try 28.440MHz.....                  
        For the latest breaking Aggie Jokes, Dial 1-800-AGGIE-IQ.....
".....and for the first time in twenty years in Waxahachie, Texas.....
......it rained!"   The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: perry@hpfcmgw.FC.HP.COM (Perry Scott)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 23:31:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [ANS] Re: [FWD] End fed 1/4 wave 80 meter antenna
Organization: HP Fort Collins, CO
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc

>>Bio wastes are easily handled by the critters that live in the soil.  It is
>>a well known fact that 3 feet of fairly normal soil will provide all of the
>>filtration needed to clean up any kind of output from your septic tank to 
>>better than city water standards.
>
>Ok.  But you forget one thing,  I never said use copper sulphate
>or other chemicals,  I said rock salt.

Has anyone ever used a fertilizer, like ammonium nitrate?

"That's not just green patch in the lawn - that's my groundplane!"


Perry
AA0ET
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: richard@sfu.ca (Richard Chycoski)
Subject: Re: 1200Mhz is not a microwave band!
Reply-To: richard@sfu.ca
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 21:09:38 GMT

In article <rrgd50-050193130047@222.5.80.3> rrgd50@email.sps.mot.com (Chris  
Terwilliger) writes:
> > In article <9301051454.AA02438@tix.timeplex.com> taylor@tix.timeplex.COM  
(Seth Taylor) writes:
> > >Since so called "microwave ovens" operate in the UHF designation
> > >frequency range why don't we call them a "UHF" ? Think about that
> > >one.
> > 
> 
> by the way...has anyone ever used tried to modulate old oven parts???
> Seems like a good project for someone with an oven they don't use any
> more...

I'm not so sure that I really want to transmit on a frequency that is absorbed  
by water (that is, after all, what a microwave oven does - heat water)! Even  
more fun in the rain! (:-)
--
- Richard Chycoski, VE7CVS            richard@sfu.ca (Internet)
  Senior Systems Consultant           richard@sfuvax (BITNET)
  Academic Computing Services
  Simon Fraser University             (NeXT Mail OK)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
From: popovich@cs.columbia.edu (Steve Popovich)
Subject: Re: License Delays
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 03:03:35 GMT

In article <Pine.3.05.9301101152.A27815-9100000@uafhp.uark.edu>,
plaws@uafhp.uark.edu (Peter Laws) writes:

> Ya know, maybe if we paid more than $0.56/yr for our licenses...
>
> BUT WAIT!  
> The FCC doesn't even get that!!!!!!!  That goes to the _volunteer_
> examiners.  The _paid_ FCC gets NOTHING.  Nothing but headaches from WHINY
> hams.  
>
> It's a wonder we get any allocations.
>
> Here's to a $50, 10 year ticket...

I don't know where you got the figure $0.56/yr., but for 1992, the
maximum fee that a VEC could charge for an examination was $5.44,
which for a 10-year license works out to $0.544/yr., not $0.56.  Your
implied examination fee of $5.60 sounds about right for 1993, though.
In any case, that $5.44 or $5.60 10-year license is renewable for your
lifetime without additional charge if you don't upgrade (and don't let
it expire out of the grace period so that you need to take the test
again).  That's a TESTING fee, not a LICENSE fee.

Besides, and more important, that DOESN'T generally go to the
volunteer examiners.  It goes to the _volunteer examiner
coordinators_.  The _volunteer examiners_ are allowed to keep only
enough of the testing fee to reimburse them for _out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in preparing, processing, administering, or
coordinating an examination_ that are _necessarily and prudently
incurred_.  In other words, the VEs are NOT allowed to make money from
giving amateur radio examinations.  And as for the FCC getting
NOTHING, they're a Federal Government agency, so even if we're not
paying them directly, we're paying them, make no mistake about it!
	-Steve
From: sream@pica.army.mil (Scott Ream, FSAC-PMD)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
Subject: Thank You!
Date: 8 Jan 93 14:15:44 GMT
Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: ucsd.edu
Originator: daemon@ucsd.edu

Tom Sefranek  WA1RHP

I enjoyed reading that first letter from you.
Thank you for the Informal Class Sunday's  Information.
I will try to tune it in on my 2-meter rig.

I have a HF rig from Kenwood    The Two Meters Rig is from Kenwood.

My 2 Meters HT is from  ICOM

I had other things to say...  Well I got my Novice in April 1, 1989

My Tech. Came in some time October 1990 

Now is the time for the General Class .............
I belong to the Sussex County Amateur Radio Club.
They have a Net every Wednesday Nights at 20:00 EST
And then they go on the HF Rig After the 2 meters

I am not sure of the Frequecny they use on the HF Rig.
For  2 Meters They use:  147.300


Well thats all for now.......73
Scott Caden Ream
Tech. Operator
KB2HKR
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc