HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: pete@physchem.ox.ac.uk (Pete Biggs)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Brit vs. English
Date: 24 Jan 93 12:56:55 GMT
Organization: Physical Chemistry Laboratory, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ
Originator: pete@joule.pcl


In article <katherim.727666304@sfu.ca>, katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
> There IS a difference, trust me.  Watch who you are flaming, or you may
> find the combined wrath of all Welsh, Scottish and Irish upon your head.
> 
> KMM

And we are supposed to be frightened by this?  Bring back Offa's dyke
and Hadrian's Wall to keep all those celts out of here.



-- 
=============================================================================
Pete Biggs :{)                         Janet: pete@uk.ac.ox.physchem
                                    Internet: pete@physchem.ox.ac.uk
=============================================================================
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Intellectuals & women
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:02:51 GMT

In article <1993Jan24.061211.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>In article <1993Jan24.091306.12344@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <1993Jan24.014919.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>
>And anyway, speaking about a couple where the woman doesn't 
>want to have children while the man would like it. What the 
>man has to do in such a situation?!? Doesn't have the man 
>the right to try to convince her, without to enforce her?

If he can convince her, fine.  But if she doesn't want to, that is the
man's tough luck.  Because her body belongs to her.  The man in that case
has every right to terminate the relationship, and find someone who 
would like to have children.  He will be able to find someone, I'm sure.
ANd then, everyone would be happy!  There would be a couple who have
wonderful children to care for and nurture, and another woman out there
in the world, independent, doing what makes her feel good.

>
>What is a decision? Everyone can change their decisions, on 
>life. And we do. The important thing is that we (man and 
>women) decide what *we* think is the right thing. 

But you will not be allowed to decide for women.  For yourself, yes.
But you have absolutely no insight into a woman's perspective.



Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 05:42:56 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: CompuTrac Inc., Richardson TX

In article <1993Jan21.020900.1300@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>In article <1jku6cINNsec@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@wpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan20.173551.20355@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>>>
>>>Liz.  Put up or shut up.  Got it?
>>>
>>
>>Do you say that to all your girlfriends?
>>
>>					--Liz
>No.  But I gladly say it to anyone who isn't capable of "throwing the big
>punches" and nevertheless wastes my time telling about how you could.
>
>LIZ:  "Boy, you dirty pink boy, if I felt like it, I bet I could sure
>       throw my big punches and leave you reeling!  Gee, golly!  I sure
>       could!  Hope you are afraid of me!!  Duh.  Duh.  You are such an
>       ignorant slut!  Belt it!  Cinch it!"

Waittaminnit!  I thought Jason was the sensitive defender of women's rights
on this thread.  

-- Andy
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Subject: Re: Graley gets no "hump" 
Summary: Graley musters the courage to respond
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:33:34 GMT
Organization: Limerick's R Us.

(Mr J S Graley) writes:
>(Andy Hart) writes:
>|
>|Mr. Graley, are you, as it is alleged, a complete virgin?  
>|
>|(Mr J S Graley) writes:
>|>Bzzzz!! No hump.
>|
>|-- Andy
>
>I'm impressed - an out of context quote!
>
>Jerk.

Ouch!  'Scuse me while I cower from your withering flames!

I am glad to see that you have mustered sufficient courage to even
reply to me, you little prick of a pearly penile papule.
 
In honor of the occasion I have composed the following tribute:

You know, Mr. Just Stupid Graley,
I read your obnoxious shit daily.
And I'm always amazed by,
Your IQ of a fruit fly.
How you got into college just fails me!

-- Andy  
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: vsg001@acad.drake.edu
Subject: Re: why?
Organization: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, USA
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 23:04:08 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.141259.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:

> I am a man with values. I already won against the little ghost, I 
> respect the losers.
 
WHAT?!? Michele, you have yet to gain an inkling of the concept of "sentence"
or "grammar", how the hell can you claim that you have "won" against *anyone*?
Values? Values? Coming from a man who prides himself on being the president of
a rapist organization...

--The Phantom
From: afrolik@ua.d.umn.edu (Ed Olczyk)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Existance
Date: 25 Jan 1993 18:40:31 -0600
Organization: University of Minnesota, Duluth
NNTP-Posting-Host: ua.d.umn.edu

In article <16060147@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com> tonyz@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Tony Zugates) writes:
>I do not exist.I do not exist.I do not exist.
>
Unfortunately for us, you do exist.  Thank you very much for wasting my time
with your meaningless 'article'.  (I use the term loosely)  I waited all day
to read something like this.  When I saw it I just about creamed my pants.
Thanks again.

-- 
Tony Frolik                                        afrolik@ua.d.umn.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: rissa@world.std.com (Patricia O Tuama)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 05:48:31 GMT

In article <1jrpdhINNqff@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>Exactly.  And your attitude towards the group will decide what kind of
>posts you will make to it, whether they be witty statements of humor
>or "fuck fuck FUCK!"

You do realize those aren't the only choices, yes?  

>	  That has nothing to do with the intelligence
>level of the poster.

Sure it does.  

>>Shut up and watch for a while - you'll see.
>I did...I lurked for a good two months.  You know what I saw?  Postings about
>male and female genetalia, postings of "OOGLE OOGLE OOGLE" and "fuck fuck
>FUCK!", and once in a great while, something funny.  

Hey, some of us have been extremely busy this past year and haven't
been able to put the kind of energy into this newsgroup that it needs.
On the other hand, who knew it was going to be over-run by children?


----------
Don't worry. I'm ignoring him now. And if I see any more of his baiting "what
did you REALLY mean?" drivel, I'll just make him #2 in my killfile next to
the other sycophant. 
				-- Kevin Darcy on Jim Keegan
				<1990Oct11.231034.20980@cfctech.cfc.com>
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Michel(l)e and artificial insemination [was Michele,pizza etc]
Date: 25 Jan 93 12:34:37 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <935525135550@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk>, STUCS204@IBM3090.BHAM.AC.UK  (Richard Thomas) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan23.193632.1@acad.drake.edu>, vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>>> In article <1993Jan23.140443.1@udphvx.cineca.it>, dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
>>>
>>>> Charlie Chaplin? Thank you. He has been a wonderful actor and a good lover.
>>>                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> MICHELE HAD A LOVE AFFAIR WITH CHARLIE CHAPLIN!!!!!
>>> You heard here first folks.
>>
>>Idiot. I have been *compared* to Charlie Chaplin. You are

> In what way have you been comaped to Charlie Chaplin?

Ask to Moana, she did. Anyway I am better.

[Thousands line of crap, deleted].

He, he, he, he... The brit scum hate italians, the brit scum 
is afraid that Italians tell the truth about british on the 
net. The brit scum is not funny and so he post tons of crap.

Stay on the Hell, Moron (you know, your fucking smelling 
island, in the middle od the sewer...)
> 
> Richard Thomas.

	Michele


P.S.	Learn to fuck. For this I suggest you to ask to 
	Beattlejuice. He wrote great advices for fags as you.
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: 25 Jan 93 22:31:47 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada

maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:

>In article <katherim.727730140@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>|maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley) writes:
>|
>|>In article <katherim.727571557@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
>|>|I (THE GREAT NAME) write:
>|>|>However, feminists like you offer bad value for money. You demand too much and
>|>|>you offer too little. Thus you grow up alone.
>|>|
>|>|Your psychological analysis of my childhood is too profound.  Perhaps you
>|>|would like to tell me that I hate my mother or that I secretly lust after
>|>|my father?
>|
>|>No, you hate your father and you secretly lust after your mother.
>|
>|Tsk, tsk, tsk.  Freudian lesson #1:  one sees in others what one 
>|hides in oneself.
>|
>|>Freud would turn in his grave if he read your crap.
>|
>|If I could make Freud turn in his grave I would be very pleased.  I've never
>|heard of anyone so unscientific and idiotic do so much damage to so many 
>|people.  He doesn't deserve to rest in peace.
>|
>See how she twists and turns... Anyone would think this was the typical
>argumentative pattern of a _woman_...

>Kathy, you mentioned a typical freudian conclusion (hating mother, lusting
>after father). Thus _you_ started that sub-thread. I expect you to deal with
>it, not to winge 'oh I think he's unscientific'. In truth, he is unscientific.
>Thus you are wrong about the validity of his so-called 'lesson #1'.

>If you use simple logic, you will realise that if one sees in others what one
A
>hides in oneself, then one can never make observations about other people, and
>the entirity of psychology would be null. But I guess you didn't, did you?

>But as your posting shows, women have no sense of logic.

Me, no logic.  That's funny Graley (one of your rare moments).  Here, I
will demonstrate my logic in proving to you that you do not know that
there is a physical world:

PREMIS #1:  You cannot know anything if there is a reasonable doubt
            that you are incorrect.
PREMIS #2:  You think you exist because of the information you gather
            from your five (arguably six, the sixth being the sense
            of the passage of time) senses.  
PREMIS #3:  You have no proof that the information from your senses is
            actually from the outside.  You could be merely a brain
            in a vat in a psych lab being prodded to produce sensation.
CONCLUSION: You cannot know whether or not there is a physical world

CONCLUSION 2 (PAY ATTENTION HERE, GRISLEY):  Don't tell someone who has
             taken philosophy that they are not logical. 

Perhaps you would like me to prove to you that you have no free will.
I can do that too.  Or that you cannot move.  It all can be logically
proven.

>~THE GREAT NAME


>-- 
>    Don't worry,
>     Its like in the comic books...
>      ITS NOT REAL!
From: andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: The Dearly Departed Phantom
Summary: There Goes the Neighborhood.
Keywords: Can Troll be far behind?
Date: 21 Jan 93 05:44:18 GMT
Organization: GhostBusters, Inc.

In article <1993Jan19.153340.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
>Ha Ha Ha Ha... not so fast Mr. Dewey! The Phantom gone?!!? Not even close! I
>have simply been watching for the past few days with amusement. JORN THINKUM OF
>BETTER WAY TO BASH SILLY AMERICANS! JORN ASK OOOOGLY MOMMIE HOW TO MAKE
>AMERICAN VERY ANGRY AND RED FACED!! JORN THEN MAKE ANNOYING .SIG!! NOW JORN IS
>MOST ANNOYING CAVE MAN TO EVER LIVE!! 
>
>"Chest thumping"? No. I never once did this. Come Andrew, let us reserve this
>for our Norweigian game from across the Atlantic.
>
>--The Phantom

Well, look what the cat has dragged in!
Our little non-corporeal friend!
We thought he departed,
But now he has farted,
And manifested himself once again!


Gee, I'm on a roll with these limericks!  );->
I think you just missed JORN, lil' spookie-wookie.  
He's taking a vacation from getting his butt reamed on alt.flame.

-- Andy 
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: na
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 21:10:31 GMT

In article <1jrou5INNq7u@bigboote.WPI.EDU> liz@bigwpi.WPI.EDU (PostMistress General) writes:
>In article <1993Jan22.213204.5867@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>>In article <C18qJL.J34@cmptrc.lonestar.org> andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
>>>
>>Women, yes.  Idiots, no.  The presence of Liz makes *any* defense of women
>>all the more difficult.
>
>As if your presence makes it even remotely possible to defend the complete
>and utter stupidity of the male gender.

Liz, am I to assume that this was one of those "big punches" of yours?  Oh, 
my, I never thought that a revamped version of the second grade "I am 
rubber, you are glue..." retort would constitute a "big punch".  Unless
of course, this is fruit punch, you are talking about.

In the meantime, I am still impressed.  Here at least you have managed
to string together a few polysyllabic words such as "remotely" and 
"possible".  I never thought you had it in you.  Of course, you
only had enough in you for a single sentence, but that's understandable.
It's good of you to resist using the type of language which you have
no doubt picked up from your "Sassy" magazine subscription.  Nevertheless,
I fear that this trend is not to continue...I am sure that the slow
devolution of Liz will resume, allowing people like Michele to have
basis for their arguments that all women are mindless cretins.  Truly, 
it is hard to call Liz a woman, she resembles the yeastie birth box of
Michele's mythology.


jason
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Michele [ Martin is a moron.]
Followup-To: alt.flame
Date: 23 Jan 93 12:24:35 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnalf.fnal.gov

Martin proved to be a Moron:

In article <C19xMM.719@world.std.com>, martin@world.std.com (Martin J Hannigan) writes:
> In article <1993Jan22.204055.29370@fuug.fi> an6882@anon.penet.fi writes:
					        ^^^^
>>
>>Re: Michele never existed. You fell for it
>> 
> Michele , we know. We know. 

Hey, piece of moronic shit! This guy is not me, how can you 
be so idiot to do not understand this?!?!
> 
>>>no-one ever posted that they thought you were Michele.  Most of us, in
>>>fact, simply agreed (historic occasion?) that you are a pointless
>>>fudge-tunneller with absolutely noooo brains at all!
> 
> Not true. I knew it was her majesty from the very first time. Michele

Yeah. How comes that you have been so smart to recognize me, 
and so *MORON* to think that this guy ws me again? It is having fun OF YOU
, morons. I told you that you are an idiot, pussy-fag.
> 
[everything deleted, no more proofs that martin is a moron 
are needed]

Learn and die, asshole.

	Michele
(yes, the only, one, moron).
From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Blinded by love; Jism and J S Graley
Date: 22 Jan 93 04:26:56 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

PLEASE NOTE:  This is not a spelling flame.


In article <1993Jan21.153809.13909@bsu-ucs> 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.095310.6796@ericsson.se>, etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim) writes:
>
>Britian
>people of Britiany, 

Gods!  It saddens me greatly to know that the future of our military have
no clue about world geography.  It makes me wonder if I am ever going to
be bombed by our own men.  Certainly men like Cadet Witless scare me.  
"Britiany?"  Do you mean Brittany?  Are you aware that it is a province
in France?  This is not the first time you have evidences a terrible
ignorance of basic geography.  It truly is a shame.  Good thing you leave
a trail of bloody excrement behind you when you leave the barracks every day,
you'd never find your way home.


>
>JEFF WITTY
>ARMY R.O.T.C.
>a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY (NOW IF I COULD JUST FIND THE US ON A MAP.)
From: dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: a misunderstood apology
Date: 25 Jan 93 12:11:38 +0000
Organization: None
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <35787@olympus.wustl.edu>, moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi) writes:

> Mr Jason Linkins: 
> ... about how I deal with Michele. I've never
> dealt with him because, differently to you and your endless pseudo-serious
> replies ....					      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  ^^^^^^^

WOOOOW! THANK YOU, my dear, THANK YOU!!!!!

Jasooonnn, you are fucked uuuuupp! he, he, he, he....
She told you are a moron. You see? 

> Moana.

   Thank you, sweetheart

	Michele
From: maufd@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: 26 Jan 1993 01:39:50 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
NNTP-Posting-Host: clover.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <katherim.728001107@sfu.ca> katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason) writes:
|Me, no logic.  That's funny Graley (one of your rare moments).  Here, I
|will demonstrate my logic in proving to you that you do not know that
|there is a physical world:
|
|PREMIS #1:  You cannot know anything if there is a reasonable doubt
|            that you are incorrect.
|PREMIS #2:  You think you exist because of the information you gather
|            from your five (arguably six, the sixth being the sense
|            of the passage of time) senses.  
|PREMIS #3:  You have no proof that the information from your senses is
|            actually from the outside.  You could be merely a brain
|            in a vat in a psych lab being prodded to produce sensation.
|CONCLUSION: You cannot know whether or not there is a physical world

Your conclusion here is correct. It's a pity you have to parrot completely
irrelevent information straight from your lecture notes in order to defend
yourself in alt.flame. Where are your _own_ conclusions? Do you have any?
Have you a brain (eg an INDEPENDENT source of new ideas)?

|CONCLUSION 2 (PAY ATTENTION HERE, GRISLEY):  Don't tell someone who has
|             taken philosophy that they are not logical. 

Ok, Miss 'philosopy', firstly my sirname is Graley, not GRISLEY.

Secondly, this conclusion does not follow from your three given premises. 

Thirdly, The premises it does follow from are incorrect. I am doing a pure
maths degree. Not only have I learned about logic, like you have, but I 
_actually_ _use_ _it_. Understand? When it comes to the ability to manipulate
abstract (but potentially real) concepts in a consistent way, you 
philosophers just don't have it. My dad did philosophy as a degree, and 
he advised me to take maths. Why? Because Philosophy is just a big boring
history lesson. You wanna be a philosopher when you grow up? Firstly, DROP
PHILOSOPHY. Learn about the world, about life, about how to think, and you
may stand a chance. But so few people become sucessful philosophers, a 
degree in it is pretty much guaranteed to be a waste of time.

Sorry to shatter your dreams, Kathy.

|Perhaps you would like me to prove to you that you have no free will.
|I can do that too.  Or that you cannot move.  It all can be logically
|proven.

I was given exactly this assertion (no free will), with explaination, by a
sixteen year old friend over christmas. He had deduced it all by himself, and
I was impressed. Coming from your lecture notes? Not so. Sorry Kathy, but
when it comes to intellect, you have already missed the bus.

So fuck off.

~THE GREAT NAME

PS I'm sure 'premis' is spelt 'premise'. I could be wrong about that...
-- 
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!
From: phuar@csv.warwick.ac.uk (Mr T Moxey)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: brits offer hardness check
Date: 25 Jan 1993 12:31:35 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: borage.csv.warwick.ac.uk


Aussie...presumably..writes:

>I got a big fat woodie just thinking about it Tim.  Your offer sure sounds
>tempting but if I go all the way to England I would hope for a little better
>action than just a hardness check.

Unfortunately I'm not into buggery....sorry, 

tim
From: etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se (Jim)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: This place is getting boring.
Date: 21 Jan 93 11:10:44 GMT
Reply-To: etljmme@etlxd30.ericsson.se
Organization: Ericsson


In article JE9@cmptrc.lonestar.org, andy@cmptrc.lonestar.org (Andy Hart) writes:
> 
>>You ought to see a doctor, Cowboy.  the sound should be more in
>>the line of:
>>
>><Belch>
>>
>
>Meaning what, Wailsh?  That you *eat* Jim's sickening crap?       
>
>-- Andy

Hey Andy, you polyp!  Some people enjoy noshing on some good, wholesome
sickness.  Full of protein and vitamins.  You should try some nice juicy
chunks of stomach lining before giving Walsh some hassle.  You just can't
beat the acrid taste of viscous bile slopping over your tongue, mmm.  I
like to slurp up the bilious liquid with a straw so I can get at the soft
cubes of vomit with a cocktail stick...see you in alt.fondle.vomit.

Jim.
Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: horntho@eng.auburn.edu (Thomas J. Horn)
Subject: Re: THE REAGAN ERA IS OVER, THE END IS NEA
Reply-To: horntho@eng.auburn.edu
Organization: Auburn University Engineering
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 16:32:04 GMT

In article 13886@bsu-ucs, 01jwwitty@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu () writes:
>In article <1993Jan20.170111.19454@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson) writes:
>> 
>> It is now 12:02 EST. The Reagan Era is OVER! Fuck you george bush, and
>> the sausage you rode in on! see ya, wouldnt wanna be ya......
>
>Well, Rob, lets see how your hero does. If he fixes things great. If not,
>you may have just shown your ignorence.
			      ^^^^^^^^^^

It is doubtful at best that Clinton (a.k.a. I promised WHAT?!? Fuck it...) will fix
anything that's wrong with our current system, to be sure.  HOWEVER, if you're 
going to flame someone for his 'ignorence,' maybe you ought ot at least know how to
spell the word first.  Just a suggestion, one that might help you keep from revealing
your IGNORANCE in the future....


 
> JEFF WITTY
> ARMY R.O.T.C.
> a.k.a. PROUD SOLDIER OF THE US ARMY

Yeah, right. Go, Navy!


---TJH

Newsgroups: alt.flame
From: Sparky
Subject: Re: info request
Summary: Re: info request
Organization: None
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 22:29:15 GMT

In article <35602@olympus.wustl.edu> moana@darla.wustl.edu (Moana Lombardi)
writes:
>
>I've seen many poster signing with
>
>   TTFN
>
>What does it means? Thx.
>
>Moana.
>

Means:  This is The Fucking News.

--Sparky