HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Green Bay 17, Pitt 3
Date: 28 Sep 1992 17:03:51 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Keywords: YES!

In article <1992Sep27.234053.3034@cis.ohio-state.edu> martens@python.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens) writes:
>
>Mandarich update:  "Sport Illustrated" did a hatchet job on
>Mandarich this week that would've been more appropriate for the
>"National Enquirer."  When was the last time you saw or heard an
>objective reporter refer to an OT as a "girlie man"?  I read a
>little bit about it in the "Packer Plus," and went out and bought
>it.  Essentially, there's nothing new or worth reading in the
>article, except the bimbo that wrote it thinks Mandarich is washed
>up.  He looked bad in preseason this year, sure, but that was due
>to health problems.  Until this summer, he'd looked better each
>season, and I think still has a chance of becoming a better than
>average OL (hopefully soon...).  At any rate, I wouldn't label him
>a bust yet.  As an aside, his contract's up at the end of the
>year.  I'd expect Wolf to re-sign him, but probably to a smaller
>contract.
>-- 
   I've never been a big Tony Mandarich fan, but I have to admit that this
   article disgusted me. SI, and Jill Lieber (I think that's her name) went
   a little overboard in ripping him. At this point, it does seem pretty
   obvious that Mandarich took steroids. I do wonder if Mandarich is being
   totally honest about that. Still, since he got his contract he hasn't
   mouthed off and has seemed like a pretty decent, humble guy (of course
   getting thrown around the NFL might have had something to do with that).
       
   I've been writing for campus and community newspapers and UPI for a few
   years now and, believe it or not, I hate to see a story like that. All
   Lieber did was rehash old news and basically make a story out of nothing.
   It also seems as though she didn't get both sides of the story, which is
   not only a shitty thing to do, but shows a tremendous lack of journalistic
   integrity.

   just my $.02

   --salty
From: bittle@niktow.canisius.edu (Jason Bittle)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: AFL teams?
Date: 29 Sep 92 02:04:34 GMT
Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo NY. 14208


does anyone have a list of all the AFL teams, and when they were around.  If
not a list, can someone provide them for me..

A steak dinner resides in this text file! :)

Thanks..



-- 
ciao,                             
Jason Bittle (bittle@niktow.canisius.edu) 
(a.k.a. Pillsbury Dough Boy )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Subject: Re: Can MIAMI  go undefeated again? was: Can Bills go 16-0?
Organization: Houses of the Holy
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 16:59:05 GMT

In article <1992Oct4.210347.28947@cass.ma02.bull.com>, silverio@cass.ma02.bull.com (Brian Silverio) writes:
> After watching Miami take Buffalo apart, the question is:
> 
> Can anyone beat Miami?
> 
> 

hahahahahahahaaahaha!

Thanks

-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: sting@intelhf.hf.intel.com (Joe Bennett)
Subject: Re: ONE QUESTION!!!!!!!!
Organization: Development Tools Operation, Intel Corp., Hillsboro  OR
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 20:55:40 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.181338.19436@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> aperkins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Aaron B. Perkins) writes:
>
>ONE QUESTION: OUT OF THE 5 TIMES ACHYMAN HAS PLAYED AGAINST THE MIGHTY EAGLES
>HOW MANY TIMES HAS ACHYMAN WON????????
>ALSO..... IN THE LAST GAME THE EAGLES PLAYED AT TEXAS STADIUM HOW MANY TIMES
>DID THE MIGHTY EAGLES DEFENCE SACK ACHYMAN????????
>
>
>
One Question:  What part of "Don't use all caps!" don't you understand?
From: laplant@helix.com (Louie LaPlant)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Majik Favre update
Date: 30 Sep 92 16:05:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: helix.235
Organization: Helix Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA

In article <1992Sep30.130914.15300@cis.ohio-state.edu> martens@python.cis.ohio-state.edu (Jeff Martens) writes:
>
>From the 9/30 USA Today:
>
>My best guess is that Favre will retain the starting job when
>Majkowski comes back.  Against the Steelers, Favre played better
>than Majkowski has since '89, and if he continues to perform well
>I see no reason to put Majik back in.  My main concern is that
>Favre is young.  Can talent and enthusiasm overcome inexperience?
>Comments?  Opinions?
>-- 
>
>-- Jeff (martens@cis.ohio-state.edu)

I agree that Favre should remain the starter. You've got to start
looking at the big picture. The big picture is the Packers have 
a good number of young players, and are unlikely to make the playoffs.
I say, throw in the young guys, let them learn on the feet. 

It seems to me, over the last ?? years the Packers have brought
along young players very sloooowly. Of course, the fact that they have
had some real stinker draft picks hasn't helped.

So, to answer your last question, maybe talent and enthusiasm can't 
overcome inexperience, but experience sure can!

Louie
laplant@helix.com
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
D. Louie LaPlant				Phone: (415) 812-1078
Software Engineer				email: laplant@helix.com
Helix Systems, Inc.				Palo Alto, CA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: leza@taichi.uucp (25853-breckinridge)
Subject: Bears loss
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 17:32:43 GMT
Keywords: 4th Quarter Let Down

I may be one of the few fans of Da' Bears to not be overly disappointed
by their 21-20 loss to the Vikings in the Humpty-Dumpty dome. There
are certain teams/places these days where I think the Bears are just
not able to win at (Detroit would be another among many). So while
I suffered watching a 20 - 0 lead with 11:00 in the 4th vanish,
I was not shocked. The Bears' defense all year has not been able to
stop anyone when it mattered. Look at this game, NY Giants, and the Saints'
games as prime examples. Even in the Atlanta victory it was more a matter
of the offense keeping the defense off the field in winning that game.
(By the way, I don;t "blame" Harbaugh's one mistake in this one. However,
the coaches and the offensive line better look at the tape from the
last 2:00 minutes closely. - And don't tell me that a lack of timeouts
was the main factor. The offensive line couldn't keep the defense away from
Harbaugh in that last 02:00 and while the draw seemed like a good idea, 
it fell flat.)

Interesting to hear what Coach Ditka said in the post game interviews:
"I will not let one guy make a mistake that ruins the rest of the team"
(referring to the interception). I saw an interview with Harbaugh later
and he did not seem that up-tight about it. 

I like Vince Tobin a lot but it's his defense that is letting the Bears
down this year. Not Greg Landry (someone I wish would move on!!) 
and his offense. 

Robert
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Vance Johnson
From: <PMONGEAU@MIAMIU.BITNET>
Date: Friday, 2 Oct 1992 15:01:46 EDT
Organization: Miami University - Academic Computer Service

I noticed in in the McPaper that Vance Johnson had been activated off
IR.  Does anyone in netland know if he is likely to play (and if so
how much) on Sunday?
 
Thanks in advance....
 
Paul
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: kschnitz@encore.com (Kevin Schnitzius)
Subject: Re: EAGLES WILL GO 16-0 IF ANYONE DOES
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 04:16:11 GMT

Hi Brian,

At this point, you are probably aware of the outcome of the game.  I wish 
to call your attention to the part about sending mail out when "its all 
said and done" so I admonish you to follow through.  You failed to re-
cognize the oldest trick on the net, the sucker post.  You followed up
a a total woofing post and took the bait -- hook, line, and sinker.  You
were wrong now admit it.
--
mr asynchronous                                   kschnitzius@encore.com

In  <1992Sep30.211847.26562@ncsu.edu>,
 bsricker@eos.ncsu.edu (BRIAN SCOTT RICKER) writes:
>Mr. Lonestar,
>
>I hope you are not as ignorant or stupid as you appear to be ... Not only
>will the Eagles fail to beat the Cowboys 42 - 3 ... They won't beat them
>period ... The Eagles 'all-world' defense is not as strong as the media
>has hyped them to be ... So far they have beaten a mediocre Saints team, a 
>pathetic Cards team, and an overated Bronco's team ... They have not faced
>the likes of an Emmit, Troy or Michael ... The minute they overload the line
>to stop Emmit ... Troy will simply air it out to Mr. Irvin ... And the
>result will be a extremely disappointed Eagles secondary ... Now, I'm not 
>saying the game will be a blow out, but the Cowboys WILL WIN, most likely 
>21 - 10 or something similar ... I'll be sure to send you some mail Tuesday
>morning when its all said and done.
>
>Cheers,
>Brian
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chill@cbnews.cb.att.com (daniel.a.miller)
Subject: Re: Conservative Projections
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 20:28:02 GMT

In article <1992Oct5.174015.276@nmsu.edu> dward@scf.nmsu.edu (Dan Ward) writes:
>
>  After 5 games being played by most of the teams, I am ready
>  to post MY projections.
>
>   AFC:  Division Winners
>         Buffalo
>         Pittsburg
>         Denver
>
>         Wildcards
>         Miami
>         Oilers
>         Kansas City
>
>  I predict Elway will go crazy in the last two minutes against
>  Buffalo and march his team down the field 80 yards so Denver can 
>  win by a field goal to represent the AFC in the Super Bowl.
>
>  I predict Dallas will represent the NFC and will be ahead
>  21 to 17 until the last two minutes.  And then, John Elway will
>  go crazy in the last two minutes and will throw a hail mary pass
>  in the last 10 seconds to win the game.  
>
>  It looks like my boy, John, is going to go for the record in last minute
>  come backs...Geez.  
>
>     Dan


	Fat Chance! The Denver was a MUCH better team when they lost
in the SuperBowl a few years back! They are VERY lucky to have one of the 
best records in the AFC at this time. And don't you worry, if Denver is 
lucky enough to get to the Super Bowl this year, they'll turn it into another
Super Bowel, and STINK the place up!

- Dan


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: alvstad@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Joel D Alvstad)
Subject: Re: EAGLES WILL GO 16-0 IF ANYONE DOES
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 21:01:30 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.191643.12032@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> aperkins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Aaron B. Perkins) writes:
>
>THE EAGLES ARE THE BEST TEAM IN THE NFL BY FAR AND WILL GO 16-0 AND WIN THE
>SUPERBOWL AND THE SCORE MON WILL BE AS FOLLOWS:
>
>                                EAGLES 42
>                                COWPUSSIES 3
>
>
>
>BARKLEY,JULIUS,CUNNINGHAM,BARNETT,BOL.......NOW THOSE ARE SOME BAD ASS DUDES

Dude, do you know ANYTHING about the playoff system??  Judging by your Super 
Bowl prediction, I'd say no.

Joel Alvstad


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: q2dt@jupiter.sun.csd.unb.ca (Turner)
Subject: MNF announcers
Organization: University of New Brunswick
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 15:28:17 GMT


	I'm seriously sick of Dan, Frank and Al's obvious jump-on-the 
bandwagon, cheer for-whoever's-winning, biased coverage on MNF.  These
guys spend more time orgasming over the winning team (especially when it is 
serious contender like the Eagles) than they do calling and analysing the game.
Randall Cuningham scores -- two orgasms; another Aikman interception -- three
more for the Philly defense; Hershall Walker scores a second touchdown -- six 
orgasms: "he has made both teams better!"  Come on guys: you can't simply 
declare that a certain team will win the Super Bowl 89-0 in October.  Perhaps
you might let the fans decide who they think are the good teams or -- God 
forbid -- maybe even let the teams decide on the field.  Either way, I wish 
they would show a little professionalism and just call the damn game.  It was 
my impression that there were stretches in the fourth quarter when none of them
even mentioned what was happening on the field.  
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: toma@db.TC.Cornell.EDU (Rory Toma)
Subject: Re: NFC Central
Organization: Not bloody likely around here!
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 07:18:00 GMT

   Detroit, however, I can't understand.  They lose to teams much worse
   than them and even Sanders isn't running well (not by his standards,
   anyway).  Rodney Peete has been throwing too poorly for a run-and-shoot
   offense to allow, and their defense just hasn't been holding people well
   enough to allow for an unproductive offense.

They are not running a run-and -shoot. I think it was TNT that pointed to
this as a possible cause of Sanders's poor (for him) performance.
--
toma@tc.cornell.edu - Rory Toma

Opinionated and tunnel-visioned? Darn right. But then, my employer really
doesn't know what I'm talking about anyway...
From: v079m8ta@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (JONNY B. GOODE)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bring on the FISH (Doug Evans might not want to read
Summary: Don't read this Doug please!!!!!
Date: 30 Sep 92 21:49:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Sep30.173829.21855@cs.ucf.edu>, tech@maitland.cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini) writes...

> [a multitude of rambling deleted]
> 
>Tony (go buffalo) Travaglini
>tech@cs.ucf.edu
> 
>PRESENTS  A TONY (go flo) TRAVAGLINI PRODUCTION 
> 
>....yes the Tegger is a big jerk but he is an integral part of the
>atmosphere at Rich Stadium.
>                 -Doug Evans (writing about his friend TEGGER)
> 
> 
>Well????????? 


	I don't get it.

Jonny B.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bob@cadnetix.COM ()
Subject: Webster Slaughter status?
Reply-To: bob@cadnetix.COM ()
Organization: Cadnetix Corp.,  Boulder, CO
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 21:02:51 GMT

What's Webster Slaughter's status for this week's game against Cincinatti?
Will he start as stated in an earlier post? Thanks for the info ...

Bob Hamel     / Dazix-Intergraph / 5101 Spine Rd. / Boulder, CO. 80301
bob@sunbox.dazixco.ingr.com / Hey Now! /
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Quaterbacks:Steve Young the best in the league
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 06:33:11 GMT

In article <BvEBrL.CvL@acsu.buffalo.edu> v077mdph@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Snoopy) writes:
>In article <1992Sep29.055313.3562@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>, asagar@gmuvax2.gmu.edu
>(Ashish Sagar) writes...
>>>Article: 27859 of rec.sport.football.pro
>>>Subject: My Opinion on Troy Aikman
>> 
>>>These are my views on Troy Aikman.  His long passing seems to be improved form
>>>last year but his ball handling is still very poor.  He is one of the best 
>>>short passers in the game and when it comes to a crutial 3rd down he has been
>>>one of the best QB`s I have seen lately.
>> 
>>>I would rank Troy as the 2nd best Qb this year tied with Cunningham.  The
>>>only one better is Kelly.
>> 
>>>Chris Van Dyke
>> 
>>Sorry dude, Troy and Cunningham would be ranked 3rd coz there are two
>>Qbs better than them.  Above them is Jim Kelly as u have said.  But
>>better than all of them at number one is definately STEVE YOUNG.  The
>>best all round quater back right now.  His passing is great and running
>>( Cunningham who? no match compared to Young) can put a number of running 
>>backs to shame.
>> 
>>Ashish
>
>	Sorry, dude, but I'd have to rank Kelly and Cunningham AND Aikman ALL
>ahead of Young!  The only reason Young seems so great is the '49ers other
>offensive personnell.  Moreover, the Bills STILL beat them!  I don't care what
>the NFL's official ranking system says, Young just isn't that great.
>
>Snoopy
>GOD I HATE THE DOLPHINS!!!!! ( Borrowed from Teg. )
>
Let me see IF I understand your narrow minded conclusion.  YOU don't 
agree with the facts or standings, i.e., NFL offical rankings.
YOU therefore believe they are wrong. However, if your favorite QB(s)
are ranked higher, then it is ok and correct.  Frankly, I don't give
a hoot about rating systems. Generally, and I am stretching a bit here 
because I don't have ALL the facts (I admit it), but RANKINGS do not win 
championships/SBs! I think it would be rare to find a NFL team that 
ranks 1st across the board.  Collectively though, a profile of a 
champion/SB NFL team GENERALLY rank in the "high" category in almost 
all aspects of the game, i.e., QB ranked high, offense/defense ranked 
high, less points scored against, best TO ratio, less yards ran against, 
most yards rushing/passing, etc. The NUMBER ONE QB, by the NFL or your 
standards, will not always be the SB winner. The most potent offense will 
NOT always be the SB winner. The best defense will NOT always win a SB.
It takes a combination and synchronization of many integral
parts, i.e., players, coaches, organization and winning attitude)
to be a winner and ultimately win a SB. To be ranked number one in
all categories will not necessarily give a team an automatic win
in the SB. Just a few unbiased and unrequested points that you
may or not agree with.
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "Fact are facts and will not disappear on account of 
   your likes."  -   Jawaharlal Nehru
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pc0837@sarah.albany.edu (COHEN PAUL L)
Subject: Re: Can MIAMI  go undefeated again? was: Can Bills go 16-0?
Organization: State University of New York at Albany
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 92 12:42:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct4.210347.28947@cass.ma02.bull.com> silverio@cass.ma02.bull.com (Brian Silverio) writes:
>After watching Miami take Buffalo apart, the question is:
>
>Can anyone beat Miami?
>
>
>-- 
>____________________________________________________
>Brian D. Silverio      b.silverio@bull.com
>(508) 294-6774


Simply put, YES!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: mdh@mlb.semi.harris.com (Mark Hanson)
Subject: Re: Tampa Bay Question
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 17:04:58 GMT
Reply-To: mdh@mlb.semi.harris.com (Mark Hanson)
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne, Fl.

In article <5613@news.duke.edu>, trradrx@canctr.mc.duke.edu (R.CLOUGH) writes:
|> 
|> What was Tampa Bay's initial losing streak when they came into the league,
|> and what was the first team that they managed to beat?
|> 

26 games I believe.
They beat New Orleans.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Hanson
Go Gators, Go Bills
============================================================================
Harris Semiconductor             Internet:   mdh@mlb.semi.harris.com
PO Box 883 MS 62B-022            Work Phone: (407) 724-7572
Melbourne, Fla. 32902
From: v069qqqc@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Mike C.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Steve Christie
Date: 2 Oct 92 06:22:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <27000112@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>, boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell) writes...
>I have nothing against the guy, but a statistic like this isn't worth
>anything.  A better set of stats would show %s for 
> 
>20 - 30 yds
>30 - 40
>40 - 50

He missed one this year... from somewhere in the 30 range. But he's perfect
everywhere else, including 50+ (a 52 yarder)


Mike
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: chico@athena.mit.edu (Thomas A Weston)
Subject: Re: PREDICTIONS for Cowboys/Eagles game
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 00:12:45 GMT

In article <91457@netnews.upenn.edu>, sajja@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (Rajeev  Sajja) writes:
|> In article <91444@netnews.upenn.edu> satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
|> >
|> >The Eagle fans at the Vet will prove themselves to be the most obnoxious
|> >bunch of idiots on the planet by throwing bottles, rocks, beer cups, etc.
|> >during every Cowboy drive.  Done so in the past will continue to do so.
|> 
|> looks like you dont like the eagles (3-0) sitting at the top of NFC
|> east. It seems like you have been going to the vet regularly. Let me
|> take a guess. You must have been to the vet once, and a bottle
|> intended for someone landed on you. You are a NewYork fan aren't
|> you....
|> 
|> GO EAGLES...
Have you ever been to the Vet?  It's horrible for baseball even.  I usually go
to maybe 2 Phillies games a year, and I'm always amazed at how drunk and
obnoxious the fans are.  And this is tame compared to how they act at a football
game.
Organisation: European Space Operation Centre (E.S.O.C)
Date: Tuesday, 6 Oct 1992 09:59:17 CET
From: RENE ZANDBERGEN <RZANDBER@ESOC.BITNET>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Divisional statistics, week 5

Hello all,
after 5 weeks, this is how the different divisions are doing.
This week mainly saw a beating of the NFC Central by the
NFC West. In the NFC, the strength seems more or less as
expected (so far), while in the AFC, the Western division is not
living up to its reputation.

Divisional statistics for week  5
---------------------------------
           All games     Outside div.
AFC East     3-2            1-0
AFC Central  0-0            0-0
AFC West     3-2            1-0

NFC East     2-3            0-1
NFC Central  1-4            0-3
NFC West     3-1            2-0

AFC - NFC matchups for week  5
------------------------------
AFC - NFC     2 - 0

Cumulative divisional statistics up to week  5 (including)
----------------------------------------------------------
             All games     Outside div.
AFC East    11-11           7-7   (0.5000)
AFC Central  9-7            8-6   (0.5714)
AFC West    10-15           3-8   (0.2727)

NFC East    11-9            5-3   (0.6250)
NFC Central 12-13           5-6   (0.4545)
NFC West    11-9            8-6   (0.5714)

Cumulative AFC - NFC matchups up to week  5 (including)
-------------------------------------------------------
AFC - NFC     5 - 8

Cheers,
        Rene Zandbergen (RCZ in the pool, but don't look up my numbers)
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Andre Rison
Keywords: whiner!
Date: 2 Oct 92 15:33:34 GMT
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <29706@ursa.bear.com> billm@thor.fsrg.bear.com (Bill Moss) writes:
>The owners use every ploy (legal and illegal) to keep every red cent they
>get out of us fans.  They make a killing.

As an aside, this is not true.  The San Francisco club lost $8 million last
year.  Does anyone have statistics on how each club is doing?

Curiously enough (and this seems to fit right into the arguement) San
Francisco had the highest player payroll last year, around $35 million.
Pittsburgh, which I think had the lowest ($17 million) made $8 million in
profit.

Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: drhall1@pbhya.PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall)
Subject: Re: Dolphins vs Seahawks observations
Reply-To: drhall1@PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 20:52:46 GMT

In article <2487@ceylon.gte.com> chf0@harvey.gte.com (Curtis Fennell) writes:
>For the 20th time in his NFL career, Dan Marino brought the Dolphins
>back from behind in the fourth quarter to win the game 19-17 in the

This is an interesting statistic. Would any other fans care to state how
often their quarterback has brought their team back in the fourth qtr?
Please include quarterbacks that are the starter, but are out because of injury
such as Kosar.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro