HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: Chris Hanson <chanson@igc.apc.org>
Newsgroups: sci.engr.chem
Date: 07 Nov 92 22:18 PST
Subject: Scandium and Osmium end-users
Nf-ID: #N:cdp:1466500001:000:327
Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!chanson    Nov  7 22:18:00 1992



I am doing some research into current uses of Scandium 
and Osmium 187.  Does anyone have information on
how these substances are used in industry and
manufacturing?  I am especially interested in
identifying end-users.

Thanks for your help.

Chris Hanson
E-mail:  chanson@igc.org
Telephone:  415-988-1155
Fax:  415-988-9209

Newsgroups: sci.engr.chem,sci.electronics,sci.chem
From: jory@athena.mit.edu (Jory Bell)
Subject: looking for non-conducting, low viscosity, teflon compatible fluid...
Followup-To: jory@mit.edu
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 14:35:13 GMT

as usual, i have a slightly weird interdisciplinary
question...
 
in a nut shell, i am looking for a non-conductive, low
viscosity, teflon-compatible fluid which i can put in an
oceanographic instrument with some electronics (IC's,
motor, and batteries) as a pressure compensating fluid!
 
some net folk may be familiar with fluorinert (FC-77), a 3M
chemical used for electronics testing (heat cycles,
etc?)... well i have been using this as a pressure
compensating fluid, but it is "incompatible" with teflon
(it makes it expan from 3%-7%), and it is keeping me from
using a certain teflon shaft seal that i have me heart set
on...
 
so, after countless fruitless calls to chemical
companies... i am turning to the net... can anyone help?
 
...thanks in advance...
 
		jory bell
 
		jory@mit.edu
From: aksurf@caltech.edu (Axel)
Newsgroups: sci.engr.chem
Subject: Poly-urethane foam suppliers
Date: 9 Nov 92 22:15:35 GMT
Followup-To: sci.engr.chem
Organization: California Institute of Technology
NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.215.9.51

In a previous message, <aksurf-051192120137@131.215.9.51> I posted:

>I had so much success with asking a question in this news group, so I'll
>ask another one. I am trying to get a hold of poly-urethane rising foam.
>This stuff usually comes in two parts you mix together. I don't want the
>finished foam, but the resins which lead to the foam. I am looking for
>closed cell foam, and preferably water blown, NO CFC's, since the ozone
>layer's got enough holes! Anyone who happens to know what companies
>supplies this stuff, (I know GE plastics does not) please E-mail me
>information. Your help would be greatly appreciated. 

OK, this time I didn't have so much luck. Not a single soul mailed me any
information on suppliers. But I did receive a deluge of mail asking me to
forward any info I get on suppliers. Hence here are some of the suppliers I
found in the southern California area: (none of which were recommended over
the network) 

The friendliest people were:
Polymer Research Laboratories in Orange, CA
212 W. Taft Ave., Orange, CA 92665
1(800)235-4201
Talk to Mike Badgett (I ordered PDL-328-4, but he might recommend something
else for teaching purposes)
Exellent Service, COurteous, friendly, definitely my recommendation.

here are a few others, 
Resin Technologies
Ontario, CA (714)947-7224 (area code might change to 909 after Nov. 14)

Expanded Rubbers and Plastics
West LA, CA (213)321-4260

Here is a vendor I would absolutely recommend you NEVER go to: Burtin
Urethane.  They are real jerks there, Poor service. They wont even trust
you with a PO number. I guess some people don't think they have to be
competitive during hard times. 

                             Axel   
Newsgroups: sci.engr.chem
From: mgqlu@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Max Lu)
Subject: How to mill paper?
Organization: Nanyang Technological University - Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 01:46:28 GMT



Hi Netters,


I have been engaged in a study of pulverizing domestic refuse and can not find
a mill/grinding machine to break paper into powder. Any advice or info would
be greatly appreciated.

Max 
-- 
-- 
* Max G Q Lu, PhD (Lecturer in Thermal Engineering)
* School of MPE, Nanyang Technological University
* Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 2263. (Email: mgqlu@ntu.ac.sg)
* Phone: (65) 7911744 Ext.4818     Fax: (65) 7911859
From: kratel@caltech.edu (Axel)
Newsgroups: sci.engr.chem
Subject: poy-urethane rising foam
Followup-To: sci.engr.chem
Date: 5 Nov 1992 19:07:30 GMT
Organization: California Institute of Technology
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.215.9.51

Hello,

I had so much success with asking a question in this news group, so I'll
ask another one. I am trying to get a hold of poly-urethane rising foam.
This stuff usually comes in two parts you mix together. I don't want the
finished foam, but the resins which lead to the foam. I am looking for
closed cell foam, and preferably water blown, NO CFC's, since the ozone
layer's got enough holes! Anyone who happens to know what companies
supplies this stuff, (I know GE plastics does not) please E-mail me
information. Your help would be greatly appreciated. 

 

************************************************************************
*           Axel Kratel                                                *
*           California Institute of technology, Pasadena, Calif. USA   *   
             
*           Keck Laboratory of Environmental Engineering               *
*           Internet: kratel@caltech.edu  Bitnet:kratel@caltech.bitnet *
************************************************************************
From: cail@ecs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: sci.engr.chem
Subject: Antoine's Constants for Ethylbenzene--where should I look?
Date: 13 Nov 92 00:56:12 GMT

Hi . . . I'm a Chemical Engineering student (sophmore) and am running into
a little difficultly finding Antoine's constants (for vapor pressure
calculations).  I searched the CRC Handbook and briefly in Perry's with
no luck.  If you have any ideas where I can find the constants for ethyl-
benzene please respond via e-mail.  Thanks.


				Brian J. Cail
				University of Massachusetts at Amherst
				(413) 546-5039
				E-Mail:  Cail@ecs.umass.edu
Xref: sparky sci.engr.chem:550 sci.energy:5269
From: cervi@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Mark Cervi)
Newsgroups: sci.engr.chem,sci.energy
Subject: Need data on thermal conductivity of EPDM synthetic rubber.
Date: 5 Nov 92 16:36:24 GMT
Followup-To: sci.engr.chem
Organization: NSWC, Carderock Div. Det., Annapolis Facility

Does anyone have a value for the thermal conductivity of EPDM synthetic
rubber.  I've checked Perrys and the CRC handbook without success.

I'm using 0.15 BTU/hr-ft2-F/ft for now, but this is only a guess to
get my calculations going.  Please post or e-mail if you know a value
(include the reference, if possible).  Thanks

Mark
-- 
	Mark Cervi, CARDEROCKDIV, NSWC Code 2752, Annapolis, MD  21402
	  cervi@oasys.dt.navy.mil, (w) 410-267-2261, (h) 410-647-0990
Newsgroups: sci.engr.chem
From: diekman@iw.uni-hannover.de (Uwe Diekmann)
Subject: Chlor in concrete
Reply-To: diekman@iw.uni-hannover.de
Organization: Institut fuer Werkstoffkunde, Uni Hannover
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 10:30:34 GMT

I have some questions concerning corrosion problems caused by
Cl within containers made of concrete:

What kinds of chemical combinations of Cl are possible and/or 
typically contained in concrete ?

Is Cl soluble in the moisture of concrete ?

If it is, is it possible to have diffusion of Cl with the 
rest-moisture of the concrete to outside?

Are there any publications or references in this subject?

ThanXs in advance.

********************diekman@iw.uni-hannover.de*******************
* Uwe Diekmann                           Tel: INT-49-511-762-3906
* Institut fuer Werkstoffkunde           FAX: INT-49-511-762-5245
* Universtitaet Hannover
* Appelstrasse 11 A             
* W 3000 Hannnover 1; Germany
*****************************************************************

Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
From: hallvard@immhp1.marina.unit.no (Hallvard Paulsen)
Subject: Re: The Carnot Engine
Reply-To: hallvard@immhp1.marina.unit.no (Hallvard Paulsen)
Organization: Division of Marine Engineering
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 06:30:16 GMT

In article <BxHGrF.CI6@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, mshar@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Mike Mshar) writes:
|> In article <1992Nov9.212250.4358@spcvxb.spc.edu> 4chua_l@spcvxb.spc.edu writes:
|> >IN MY THERMODYNAMICS CLASS SOMEBODY ASKED THE QUESTION:  THE CARNOT ENGINE 
|> >IS AN IDEAL ENGINE WHOSE THERMAL EFFICIENCY IS 100% IS THERE AN ENGINE THAT 
|> >EXIST IN TODAY'S WORLD THAT CLOSELY RESEMBLES THAT OF THE CARNOT 
|> >ENGINE'S THERMAL EFFICIENCY?
|> > 			PLEASE HELP THIS STRUGGLING PHYSICS MAJOR OUT
|> >			TTTTTTHHHHHHAAANNKKKKK YYYOOOUUU!!!!
|> >						THE PERTURB PSEUDOPHYSICIST
|> 
|> Correct me if I am wrong, but a Carnot engine can not be 100% efficient. I
|> seem to remember that the equation for effieciency of a Carnot engine can
|> be expressed as  
|> 
|> Efficiency = 1-(Cold Temperature/Hot Temperature)
|> 
|> So, unless operating at absolute zero, there is no way a Carnot engine can
|> be 100% efficient. Am I right on this, or am I thinking of something
|> different??
|> 
|> Anyway, I have heard that the the latest model heat pumps for homes and
|> businesses come very close to the ideal Carnot efficiency. Anybody else
|> hear this too??
|> 

	You are right. Acctually there is no such thing as an Carnot engine
it is only an ideal process that is used as a first approximation for 
calculating an engines maximum efficency. (Assuming things like instant
heat supply at max compression no heatloss and so on.)

	I don't think the Carnot prosses fits the prosess of a
heat pump very well, but heat pumps is not my field. For a large
diesel engine the overall efficency can get up to above 50% while
the Carnot prosess will give about 65%. So there still is *some*
room for improvement (not much though).


  \\___//
  |     |       Hallvard Paulsen, MSc
  |_____|       Research Engineer / Grad. Stud
  || o ||       Division of Machinery
  || \\||       NORWEGIAN MARINE TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
      \\        TEL : +47 (07)595639
       o        FAX : +47 (07)595983
      //        EMAIL : hallvard.paulsen@imm.unit.no
     O     

Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
From: rizzo@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (anthony.r.rizzo)
Subject: Re: The Carnot Engine
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 15:38:01 GMT

In article <1992Nov9.212250.4358@spcvxb.spc.edu> 4chua_l@spcvxb.spc.edu writes:
>IN MY THERMODYNAMICS CLASS SOMEBODY ASKED THE QUESTION:  THE CARNOT ENGINE 
>IS AN IDEAL ENGINE WHOSE THERMAL EFFICIENCY IS 100% IS THERE AN ENGINE THAT 
>EXIST IN TODAY'S WORLD THAT CLOSELY RESEMBLES THAT OF THE CARNOT 
>ENGINE'S THERMAL EFFICIENCY?
> 			PLEASE HELP THIS STRUGGLING PHYSICS MAJOR OUT
>			TTTTTTHHHHHHAAANNKKKKK YYYOOOUUU!!!!
>						THE PERTURB PSEUDOPHYSICIST

The Carnot efficiency is not 100%.  The Carnot efficiency
is given by:

                     n = 1 - (Tcold/Thot)

where Tcold and Thot are the fluid temperatures in absolute
temperature units.  There is nothing in real life that can achieve
the Carnot efficiency, at least among heat engines.  But there
are other energy conversion methods that easily exceed the Carnot
efficiency, because they are not heat engines.  Examples of these
are the electric motor and the fuel cell.  These are not limited
to operating below the Carnot efficiency, because they do not
operate between a hot reservoir and a cold reservoir, as do heat
engines.

Modern powerplants can achieve reasonably high efficiencies.  But they
don't necessarily come close to the Carnot efficiency.  There are
power cycles that can achieve good efficiencies.  See any thermodynamics
textbook for a relatively comprehensive list, with explanations.

Tony
From: jhaines@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Jason Haines)
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
Subject: What is a topel?
Date: 7 Nov 92 21:37:38 GMT
Organization: University of Pennsylvania


	In a recent technical document I was reading - the following
word was used: topel
	This is a document in German but many of the words are in
English (like ECU, computer, etc...).  This does not seem to be
a German word either.

any help would be appreciated



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason R. Haines		     University of Pennsylvania (SEAS & Wharton)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Red '90 Mustang LX 5.0    /     Blue '71 Rotary Powered Datsun 510
(Recycle your toner cartridges)	           (^^^^^FOR SALE^^^^^)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
From: burtp@rs6403.ecs.rpi.edu (Philip Nason Burt)
Subject: Re: Any experience with programming in C++ related to Mech.Eng.
Keywords: c, c++, fortran, finite elements
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 23:50:41 GMT

In article <Nov05.202840.71890@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> kk881595@longs.LANCE.ColoState.Edu writes:
>(4)  How much code is there that you can reuse for your project?
>Most projects that one can undertake have been *almost* done
>already, even most Ph.D. work.  The time spent finding a code that
>you can modify rather than recreate is usually worth it.  Because
>of the history of scientific programming most of that code is
>written in Fortran.  
>
>
>The existence of such a code (4) for your project,
>in my opinion, is probably the only reason to use Fortran if you
>feel comfortable programming in C++.  I have found that points
>(1), (2), and (3) usually fall strongly in favor of C and/or C++.
>I must say that I do most of my programming in Fortran precisely
>because of point (4), but I also cuss alot.
>

Though I haven't done much programming myself (the last program I
wrote was a Maple 2d 2nodes/element finite element truss problem
solver), I am considering doing some undergrad research in finite
elements next semester.  I spoke with some people as to which language
I should brush up on and one of them gave me a surprising answer.  He
said that although most previous programs have been done in Fortran,
it is possible to mix routines in one program using C.  I have no clue
how this is done, but I look forward to figuring out how next
semester.

later,
phil

ps.  Does anyone know of schools that are doing interesting research
with solid finite element methods?  I am graduating in May and I don't
know what to do with myself.  I can relocate to any part of the world.
From: msorsini@eos.ncsu.edu (MARCO SALVADOR ORSINI)
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
Subject: Re: The Carnot Engine
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:28:51 GMT
Reply-To: msorsini@eos.ncsu.edu (MARCO SALVADOR ORSINI)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Originator: msorsini@c00569-1403br.eos.ncsu.edu


In article <BxHGrF.CI6@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, mshar@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Mike Mshar) writes:
|>Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
|>Path: taco!rock!stanford.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!mshar
|>From: mshar@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Mike Mshar)
|>Subject: Re: The Carnot Engine
|>Message-ID: <BxHGrF.CI6@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
|>Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
|>References: <1992Nov9.212250.4358@spcvxb.spc.edu>
|>Date: Mon, 9 Nov 92 23:35:38 EST
|>Lines: 30
|>
|>In article <1992Nov9.212250.4358@spcvxb.spc.edu> 4chua_l@spcvxb.spc.edu writes:
|>>IN MY THERMODYNAMICS CLASS SOMEBODY ASKED THE QUESTION:  THE CARNOT ENGINE 
|>>IS AN IDEAL ENGINE WHOSE THERMAL EFFICIENCY IS 100% IS THERE AN ENGINE THAT 
|>>EXIST IN TODAY'S WORLD THAT CLOSELY RESEMBLES THAT OF THE CARNOT 
|>>ENGINE'S THERMAL EFFICIENCY?
|>> 			PLEASE HELP THIS STRUGGLING PHYSICS MAJOR OUT
|>>			TTTTTTHHHHHHAAANNKKKKK YYYOOOUUU!!!!
|>>						THE PERTURB PSEUDOPHYSICIST
|>
|>Correct me if I am wrong, but a Carnot engine can not be 100% efficient. I
|>seem to remember that the equation for effieciency of a Carnot engine can
|>be expressed as  
|>
|>Efficiency = 1-(Cold Temperature/Hot Temperature)
|>
|>So, unless operating at absolute zero, there is no way a Carnot engine can
|>be 100% efficient. Am I right on this, or am I thinking of something
|>different??
|>
|>Anyway, I have heard that the the latest model heat pumps for homes and
|>businesses come very close to the ideal Carnot efficiency. Anybody else
|>hear this too??
|>
          As I seem to remember from my thermo. 1 class
          the Carnot efficiency is the best that you could do
                                       ----
       It is a good measure to compare the efficiencies of your system 
    to.   
   
     If I am wrong please don't flame me. I am only an undergraduate ME
From: 4chua_l@spcvxb.spc.edu
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
Subject: The Carnot Engine
Date: 10 Nov 92 02:22:50 GMT
Organization: St. Peter's College, US

IN MY THERMODYNAMICS CLASS SOMEBODY ASKED THE QUESTION:  THE CARNOT ENGINE 
IS AN IDEAL ENGINE WHOSE THERMAL EFFICIENCY IS 100% IS THERE AN ENGINE THAT 
EXIST IN TODAY'S WORLD THAT CLOSELY RESEMBLES THAT OF THE CARNOT 
ENGINE'S THERMAL EFFICIENCY?
 			PLEASE HELP THIS STRUGGLING PHYSICS MAJOR OUT
			TTTTTTHHHHHHAAANNKKKKK YYYOOOUUU!!!!
						THE PERTURB PSEUDOPHYSICIST
From: abdel@lcaohp3.epfl.ch (Abdelkader Belhi)
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
Subject: Test
Date: 6 Nov 92 15:16:37 GMT
Reply-To: abdel@lcaohp1.epfl.ch
Organization: :


From: selee@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Lee Say Eng)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 09:14:00 GMT
Subject: Need HELP !
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech


I have been trying without much success to find the amount of
damage that a machine part will suffer when it is impacted by 
a moving body.  I understand that when the kinetic energy of
the moving body exceeds the maximum elastic strain energy of
the machine part, the part will (if we neglect the inertia of
the part and the energy dissipated during impact) either suffer
some permanent deformation or be crushed at the location where
the cross-sectional area is minimum.   I however do not know
how to find by how much the part will be crushed in such a case.
It could be found experimentally but it would also be beneficial
to be able to theoretically predict things.  The material is
pretty brittle but to simplify things, it might be easier to
ignore failure by crack propagation.  Any help will be greatly
appreciated.   


		     ********
		     * mass *  |  Free falling mass
		     *  m   *  |  from height h 
		     ********  V


                               |
                               |
                               V
		       ****  ---  Distance that will
          Machine     *    * ---  be crushed ??
           Part      *      *  ^
                    *        * |
                   *          *
              ___ *___________ * _____
	      ////////////////////////
		    Rigid Base
                 
  
  Data known regarding machine part:  
  
		Dimensions/geometry 
		Young's Modulus, E
		Compressive strength
		Ultimate tensile strength

Thanks in advance,

Alan Phang

alan@hpmalr50.mal.hp.com






                       
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
From: kk881595@longs.LANCE.ColoState.Edu (kevin knappmiller)
Subject: Re: Any experience with programming in C++ related to Mech.Eng.
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 20:28:40 GMT
Reply-To: kk881595@longs.LANCE.ColoState.Edu
Organization: Colorado State U. Engineering College

There are quite a few issues that one needs to address when
deciding to program in C or C++ versus Fortran. Here are a few:

(1)  If you are really going to "program" yourself, as opposed to
just assembling code fragments,  the quality of the particular
development environment which you can afford for your 
hardware platform is very important.  I would assert that
this is more important for most "scientific" programming
than a particular language.  If you are going to write
your own code it will probably be on the order of 1000 lines.
I have found that for problems of this length the use of the
"object based concepts in C++" often only make matters more
difficult, especially if (2) is important.

(2)  What is the execution speed of the general algorithms
you are going to use in each of the languages on the targeted
platforms?  For example on a Cray YMP it is much easier to
get Fortran to run fast than it is to get C to run fast.  This
may be important towards the overall cost of your work.  It may
not be.  As a note I found that on every platform I used, ie
Vax, DecStation, PC, Cray YMP, I was always successful in getting
C code to run faster than the equivalent Fortran, but, especially
on the Cray, it took more work.

(3)  What tools are available to you that apply to your programming?
For example object libraries in C++, or high level scientific or math
libraries in Fortran.  

(4)  How much code is there that you can reuse for your project?
Most projects that one can undertake have been *almost* done
already, even most Ph.D. work.  The time spent finding a code that
you can modify rather than recreate is usually worth it.  Because
of the history of scientific programming most of that code is
written in Fortran.  


The existence of such a code (4) for your project,
in my opinion, is probably the only reason to use Fortran if you
feel comfortable programming in C++.  I have found that points
(1), (2), and (3) usually fall strongly in favor of C and/or C++.
I must say that I do most of my programming in Fortran precisely
because of point (4), but I also cuss alot.

Kevin
kk881595@longs.lance.colostate.edu
From: sasg0244@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Steven Arthur Sivier)
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
Subject: Re: Photos of computer screens
Date: 7 Nov 92 02:47:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.BxBrqE.CEE
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

bellg@zeus.swindon.rtsg.mot.com (Graham Bell) writes:

>I have the need to take some photographs of colour shaded images of my computer
>screen, but I am no photography expert !.
>I have a Praktica SLR camera.
>What film speed should I use ?.
>Are there any techniques/tricks that will help 

This is how I do take pictures of an IRIS screen. I use a tripod and turn
off all lights in the room. I use 100 ASA film and set the exposure to
f5.6 for 1/8th of a second. Your mileage may vary depending on how bright
your screen is and how dark you can get your room.

Steve
sasg0244@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
From: debs@dcs.qmw.ac.uk (Deborah Englis Pollard; Part time MSc)
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
Subject: KIVA and KIVA-2 CFD software
Summary: Where can I get KIVA?
Keywords: CFD
Date: 10 Nov 92 17:07:30 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Dept, QMW, University of London


We are looking for the computational fluid dynamics
software package KIVA which now may be in its 2nd
edition KIVA2 or KIVA-2.

We think it comes from Oakland, California. 
(Oakland College?, Univ of California?)

Can anyone give me a name and address to contact?

Thanks.
From: s0r6574@summa.tamu.edu (RAMANATHAN, SUBRAMANIAN)
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
Subject: Ph.d in Computational fluid dynamics, jet propulsion
Date: 11 Nov 92 04:15:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: summa.10NOV199222151451
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Hi all netters!

I am doing my masters' in mechanical engineering at Texas A&M with a 
specialization in computational fluid dynamics.  I would like to have
some information on the top 15 schools in this area and jet propulsion.
please send your replies to s0r6754@summa.tamu.edu.  thanks in advance.
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech
From: smccue@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Shannon McCue)
Subject: thermodynamic data of Refrigerant 22
Organization: The Ohio State University
       Does anyone have information on the superheated region of
 Refrigerant 22.  I've looked through several sources and have only
 come up with saturated tables.  I need information for pressures
 between 200 and 400 psi.
                    Thank you
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 14:29:27 GMT

                    Shannon McCue
     acs.magnusug.1.smccue
Newsgroups: sci.engr.mech