From: mkagalen@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (michael kagalenko)
Subject: Re: Marxism
Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 02115, USA
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 23:57:38 GMT

You still dont know what paranoya is about ? Read this article , then !
It's an endless fun.

In article <C183Et.An3@umassd.edu> pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU writes:
>Soviet imperialism is merely a phase of the Marxist dialectic. While the fools 
>scream about ancient ethnic hatred, Marxist lie in wait and plot. The dialectic 
>is in its split or retreat stage and when sufficient Soviet missiles and 
>missile subs have been built (and they are continuing to be built) then the 
>dialectic will unify the revolution and go on the attack.
>	The leader of the phony Soviet coup, Gennadi Yanayev, was/is the head 
>of the International Policy Commission of the CC of the CPSU. The IPC 
>supervises the International Dept, the most important center of the 
>international communist conspiracy. The ID coordinates all Marxist parties, 
>allied groups, terrorists, etc. This is the permanent institution of 
>international communism. It's not even secret. It publishes _International 
>Affairs_ (Moscow), a brilliant, THEORETICAL journal of international policy. 
>_IA_ often complains that American Pragmatists try to destroy the revolution by 
>denying a leading role to theory. _IA_ is somewhat confused about Pragmatist 
>motives but typically thinks they are intentionally harmful. Stalin, Lenin, and 
>Mao knew better and correctly identified the stupidity of anti-theoretical 
>Pragmatists whose idea of war and revolution was limited to immediate military 
>action. Marxists know war is basically intellectual and then political. Then, 
>much later, it is military. 
>	Soviet Marxists have used the dialectic in such events as: 
>Brest-Litovsk Treaty, Far Eastern Republic, The Trust, Tanaka Memorial, 
>Stalin's Constitution, Uncle Joe Against fascism, Khrushchev's destalinazation, 
>2nd Yugoslav-Soviet split, Sino-Soviet split, Cuban missile crisis, Gorby's 
>glasnost, withdrawal from east Europe, phony split between phony conservative 
>and phony liberal Soviets, Soviet breakup, Soviet search for froeign aid and 
>international respectability.
>	Another IPC head was Alex Yakovlev, alleged liberal and Movement for 
>Democratic Reform co-founder. Strange coincidence? Only to a Pragmatist for 
>whom no events are causally related.
>	Chinese Marxists told stupid American Pragmatists that they (Marxists) 
>were agrarian reformers. They were! For that stage in history! Then they 
>conquered China and the revolution advanced.
>	No. Vietnamese Marxists told stupid American Pragmatists they were 
>nationalists. They were! For that stage in history! US won the conventional 
>military and even guerilla war. But Marxists staged militarily stupid Tet 
>offensive and won political victory when US withdrew. 
>	Theoretical disputes among Marxists 
>and claims that Marxism has ended at various times 
>or was never tried are not serious. They ignore dialectic  which allows 
>Marxists to split and retreat as proper part of revolution. Marxists not afraid 
>of retreat. They consider retreat a NECESSARY part of revolution. History, as 
>Lenin thought is a zig-zag. 
>	Soviets have had a first strike nuclear missile strategy since, at 
>least, Sokovlovsky's integrated view of war in _Sov. Mil. Strategy_. They have 
>had a capacity to WIN a nuclear WW3 since, at least, 1980. They can hit 
>military, destroy most of US nuclear force, tolerate 20 million Soviet civilian 
>dead (US missiles aimed mainly at Soviet civilians (McNamara's immoral MAD 
>policy) and, with Sov leaders, nuclear forces,( hidden, protected, or phony), 
>and industry safe, blackmail US with 2nd strike on cities w/150 million 
>potentially dead. US would surrender. Various US leaders warned about Soviet 
>nuclear power after "coup" but no one listened. 
>	US needs a theory of international relations that is integrated and 
>long-range. We need immediate low-tech anti-missile deployment (possible w/off 
>the shelf equipment) and serious SDI in near future. US must take Marxist 
>agents-of-influence seriously. Agents-of-influence are more powerful than 
>military. They must be arrested and tried for treason or espionage. And, if 
>found guilty, killed. 
>