HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: carlos@infoserv.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Could somebody tell me the quality of Boca modems?
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 93 18:47:46 -0500
Reply-To: carlos@infoserv.com
Organization: Dominguez UseNet, Brooklyn NY, USA

In <C08FLw.3J3@hyperion.wright.edu> thanatos@hyperion.wright.edu (Terry Chlebek) writes:

>This is not correct.  The internal boca doesn't have ANY UART installed.
>It EMULATES only the 16450.  I have one and it can't reliably transfer
>at 14.4k in Windows 3.1 if you try to do anything else while the
>transfer is occuring.

oops! Since I own the external, I guessed wrong! Next time I will
read before I post... :-)

I think the quick-comm internal v32bis modem has a built-in 16550.



 

-- 
  ___ ___  __   .   ___  __  //  Carlos Dominguez, MS-DOS Enthusiast !
 /   /__/ /_ ) /   /  / /_  // | carlos@infoserv.com  carlos@dorsai.com
(__ (  / /  \ (__ (__/ __/ ..  | carlos@phantom.com   FIDONET 1:278/706
                                 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.sys.sun.admin,cu.sun.managers
From: larry@gator.use.com (Larry Snyder)
Subject: Re: Anyone out there successfully get a 14.4K modem running on a Sun?
Organization: Gator Communications - Feeds-R-Us 219-289-3745 
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 15:15:28 GMT

bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes:

>Using the WorldBlazers' V.32bis carrier, you'll see FTP throughput
>around 2.4 Kbytes/sec for /vmunix, or 2.8 Kbytes/sec for text files (I
>use 5 concatenated copies of /usr/dict/words).  Text files go faster
>because they're more susceptible to in-modem V.42bis data compression.
>An 8-byte ICMP ping packet shows a minimum round-trip time around
>240ms, and a single-character telnet packet shows a minimum round-trip
>time around 150ms.  

Have you played with other modems like the USR Courier v.32bis modems?
Folks (including myself) have found a reduced latency with these modems
improving interactive throughput.

Do you suggest MNP enabled on SLIP v.32bis lines -- or just v.32bis
and v.42bis?

-- 
Larry Snyder                                    internet: larry@gator.use.com
keeper of the Gator                                   uucp: uunet!gator!larry
From: mossako@obelix.uni-muenster.de (Martin Mossakowski)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Problems with WinFAX Pro 2.0
Date: 28 Dec 92 10:54:57 GMT
Organization: Westf. Wilh.-Universitaet Muenster, Germany
NNTP-Posting-Host: obelix.uni-muenster.de

Hi
I have a problem with sending graphics with WinFax Pro 2.0 to another fax
station. 
When I write normal text in Winword and then print it to WinFax the receiver
of my fax gets it without any problems. But as soon as I include a small 
graphic, i.e. Word Art, the receiver won't receive anything although the
conversion to Winfax was ok.
Does somebody know if Winfax Pro 3.0 has the same problem ?
Does somebody has a clue for version 2.0 ?
Thanx
-- 
== Martin Mossakowski     mossako@obelix.uni-muenster.de
==         Once there was a footstep in the sand
==         Was it a white man, a black man, a Chinese ...?
==         The sand answered "It was a man..."   (Unknown)"
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:18423 comp.os.os2.misc:40229
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: My experience w/ my new ZyXel 1496E
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 22:51:54 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

paul@tct.com (Paul Levin) writes:

> I found the command to get the firmware version number (it was a fax
> command, why ?).

   What's wrong with "ATI0"?

> 	Can someone tell me the phone number to ZyXel USA's buliten board ?

   1-714-693-0762

> 	I assume they have a ZyXel modem there, and I can test the 16.8.  

   Be prepared for disappointment: 16.8 kbps is not very robust.

> 	Also, I want to download the latest firmware.  How is that done ?  

   They do not have the latest firmware posted.  The bulletin about buying 
EPROM upgrades mentions an even older version.

> 	Does anyone know which EPROM chips are in the 1496E ?

   The megabit ones (128K by 8). 27010's, I believe.

> 	What is wrong with the fax on this thing ?  Has anyone else used
> 	Bitfax with the ZyXel ?

   FACT: FAXmodem software stinks.

 - there is a huge compatibility problem, mostly thanks to FAXmodem 
manufacturers not waiting for the Class 2 FAX specification to be finalized.
 - there are few receive FAX utilities that aren't DOS TSRs.
 - standard file formats support (WordPerfect, PCL, PostScript, etc.) is 
surprisingly poor. 

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Subject: Re: WordBlazer Firmware
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 00:58:56 GMT

jay@gdx.UUCP (Jay Snyder) writes:
>
>What changed from LA5.02 to LA7.01 
>

No major new features or anything.  Probably some bug fixes.
Tech Support should be able to tell you if a problem you're
seeing was addressed in LA7.01.

>
> (and what happened to LA6?)
>

It was shipped to Europe.  LA6.xx has all the extra stuff for
gaining approval in various countries overseas.  That stuff
may be rolled in with the U.S. stuff someday, but at the moment
they're different versions.

  -Greg
-- 
:::::::::::::::::::  Greg Andrews  gerg@netcom.com  :::::::::::::::::::
It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
From: GOODRIC@hsdwl.utc.com (Jim Goodrich)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Telebit T1000 queston
Date: 28 Dec 92 21:51:20 GMT
Organization: The Internet


Hi Netters,

Does the Telebit T1000 use a propriety protocol or does it support
the v.32/v.42 standards?  In other words, will it only talk to another
Telebit T1000?

Thanks,

Jim Goodrich - WA4VGZ
goodric@hsdwl.utc.com 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Subject: Re: Modem proximity to stereo speaker
Keywords: any risk?
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 08:15:51 GMT

birchall@pilot.njin.net (Shag) writes:
>
>For the time being, I have placed the modem atop one of my stereo speakers.
>The speaker is a small "bookshelf" sized unit.  
>
>Not being a whiz when it comes to radio interference, electronics, and the
>effect of radio waves on ROMs and such, I'm wondering whether this is a bad
>idea.  If it _is_ a bad idea to have the modem right on top of the speaker,
>I'd also be interested in knowing how far from the speaker (or other RFI
>sources - monitor, etc) it should be for optimal safe operation.
>
>I am _presuming_ modems are fairly restant to such interference - after all,
>there are internal modems, which put up with all the radio waves bouncing
>around inside PC's.
>

Your problem with the modem being near the speaker wouldn't be radio
interference.  If anything, it would be electromagnetic fields.

Most modems use a transformer as part of the isolation circuit (preventing
voltage spikes from the phone line from frying things).  Transformers use
electromagnetic fields to pass signals through, so they can be sensitive
to magnetic fields from outside sources.

I've never experimented with a modem and a speaker, so I don't have any
idea whether it could cause you a problem or not.  I just wanted to mention
the possibility that the speaker's magnet might be able to affect the phone
line transformer in your modem.

If your modem has a metal case that's grounded, then it's probably not
going to be a problem.

-- 
:::::::::::::::::::  Greg Andrews  gerg@netcom.com  :::::::::::::::::::
ObGuindon:  Scientists have just discovered that in winter, carp
            migrate to a rather sleazy hotel in Newark, N.J.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael Rosen)
Subject: Re: How do I get DSZ to work in Telix?
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 16:18:25 GMT

wilken@plains.NoDak.edu (Scott Wilken) writes:

>In article <1992Dec23.153404.1746@rtfm.mlb.fl.us> luckey@rtfm.mlb.fl.us (Jon Luckey) writes:
>>
>>Telix has ZMODEM built into it.  Why do you want to add an external ZMODEM
>>protocol?

>The ZMODEM built into telix isnt very good.  It just does the most basic
>ZMODEM functions.

>DSZ implements other features including ZMODEM-90, which  includes MobyTurbo
>(MobyTurbo is just the tiniest hair slower than Ymodem-G, and still gives
>you the features of Zmodem (resume, etc, and it wont abort when it recieves
>a line error like Ymodem-G will).

Also, because I can't get zmodem to work to upload through a telnet
connection and I'm hoping something else will work.

Mike
--
Michael Rosen						"Time and space
Tau Epsilon Phi - George Washington University		 can be a bitch."
mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu					  -Quantum Leap
Michael.Rosen@bbs.oit.unc.edu or @lambada.oit.unc.edu
From: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org (Christian Weisgerber)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: My Individual Private Site
Subject: Re: Bandwidth of HST and V.32bis
Reply-To: naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
X-Software: HERMES GUS 1.10 Rev. Dec 18 1992
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 23:01:30 CET
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In <1992Dec28.052058.5016@csie.nctu.edu.tw>, Yeng-Chee Su writes:

>   Does anyone know the bandwidth of HST and V.32bis?  As I know, the V.32bis
> is 600Hz - 3KHz but what's the HST?

HST uses the same bandwidth as V.32bis for its main channel,
additionally there's a 450bps back channel at 375Hz. Sorry, I don't know
it's symbol rate. Could be 75bd. (Anybody know?)

> I'm finding why the HST is doing better than V.32bis in most
> situation(worse line). Is the bandwidth narrow than  V.32bis?  If not,
> why?  

They use pretty much the same bandwidth, however V.32bis uses it twice,
as both channels occupy the same bandwidth. The modem has to subtract
the signal it just sent from what it receives. I'm not into digital
signal processing but obviously this is difficult to accomplish. V.32bis
modems rather easily get out of sync and have to retrain or drop carrier
altogether.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber, Germany           naddy@mips.ruessel.sub.org
From: matttrem@willard.UUCP (Matthew Trembley)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Could somebody tell me the quality of Boca modems?
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 22:27:56 EST
Organization: Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814

Hello.
I thank the ones of you that replied to my message asking about the 
quality of Zoom modems.  Half of you that replied said that I should get 
it and that it was reliable and the other half was the opposite.  That 
sort of tells me that ONLY half of the people that get Zoom modems are 
happy with them!
I a VERY good deal on a Boca modem recently for the same price as the 
other Zoom modem I found.  
The deal was a 14.4 Boca modem(internal) with all the kinds of 
compression and correction with speeds up to 57,600 for 220$.  Although 
it didn't say anything about it containing a UART(whatever that is, but I 
thought it might be important since it is talked about so much here. I 
read it all but... oh well...).
Thanks in advance(again).

-- 
matttrem@willard.UUCP (Matthew Trembley)
gatech!vdbsan!willard!matttrem
emory!uumind!willard!matttrem
Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814
From: heiser@acs.bu.edu (William Heiser)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Hayes Optima or Intell 440/e ???
Date: 4 Jan 93 03:45:07 GMT
Organization: Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <C0Az3x.IMs@world.std.com> rsm@world.std.com (Robert Marlan) writes:
>heiser@acs.bu.edu (William Heiser) writes:

>? what about the USR 14.4 /16.8 ?  I am considering all of the above and
>am curious why you are not considering the USR. What about the usr vs. the
>t-3000? thanks.

I think the USR 16.8K is an "odd duck".

If it were between Telebit and USR, I think I'd lean towards Telebit.
Why?  Because I've had good luck with them.  My old (admittedly it is
pretty old) has a peculiar personality and my attempt at buying new USR's
failed.
From: yenchee@csie.nctu.edu.tw (Yeng-Chee Su)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Bandwidth of HST and V.32bis
Date: 28 Dec 92 05:20:58 GMT
Organization: Computer Science & Information Engin., Chiao-Tung U, Taiwan, ROC
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]


  Does anyone know the bandwidth of HST and V.32bis?  As I know, the V.32bis
is 600Hz - 3KHz but what's the HST?  I'm finding why the HST is doing better
than V.32bis in most situation(worse line).  Is the bandwidth narrow than 
V.32bis?  If not, why?  

--
   ______________________________________________________________________
  /             National Chiao Tung University in Taiwan               / \
 |  Name: Yeng-Chee Su              Dept:  Computer Engineering       |__/
 |  Phone: +886-35-716843 (home)    E-mail: yenchee@csie.nctu.edu.tw  |
 |  Address: 5F, 9, 23 Lane, Dong Sun Street, HsinChu, Taiwan 30038   |___ 
  \___________________________________________________________________\__/
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: billmcc@seanews.akita.com (Bill McCormick)
Subject: Re: Could somebody tell me the quality of Zoom Modems?
Organization: SEANEWS - Seattle Public Access News & Mail
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 18:54:12 GMT

In article <1992Dec28.011630.13838@tigger.jvnc.net> johnson@tigger.jvnc.net (Steven L. Johnson) writes:
>>(If anyone in the S. Jersey area wants to see if the Zoom in question will
>>connect to _their_ modem at 14.4, the number's 609 778 5572 - I'm curious
>>as to which brands work with which.)
>
>I tried the number in question twice, and manually forced a retrain
>twice while online with a Telebit WorldBlazer.  All connects were
>12000.  FWIW.

I also got 12000 from a Worldblazer, and 9600 from a Hayes Ultra 144.

-- 
SEANEWS  []  Seattle News + Mail  []  Public Access  []  +1 206 747 NEWS
E-mail for PGP key.   MD5 (no sigs) is: 8e253e95133365a292261c7d0da58bcb
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: jack@sybil.jpl.nasa.gov (Jack Kobzeff)
Subject: Re: Upgrading a ZyXEL 1496E to an E+
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: Jet Propulsion Lab
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 23:54:07 GMT

In article <eleung.725686060@sfu.ca>, eleung@fraser.sfu.ca (Edward Leung)
wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello, ZyXEL owners.
> 
> I am interested in upgrading my ZyXEL 1496E to an E+ and I would like to ask
> the net for some assistance.  I understand the differences are minor enough 
> that someone with hardware experience should be able to perform the necessary
> modifications.

In my conversation with a ZyXel rep, she said that there was no upgrade
from a E to a E+. They said that the major changes are that the clock speed
is higher and the EPROMS are larger. I reaaly didn't get into much detail.

Jack Kobzeff     (jack@????.jpl.nasa.gov) Mail address is changing
From: Alexey.Sen@p0.f7.n5000.z2.fidonet.org (Alexey Sen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Help, please!
Date: 20 Dec 92 09:11:00 GMT
Reply-To: Alexey.Sen@p0.f7.n5000.z2.fidonet.org
Organization: INC felis_hole

Hello All!
Will you help me?
The matter is I look for info about radiomodem which can
help us to create RadioMail communications between number of ships with IBM-
compatible computers on boards. Is there anywhere modems like this? Can you
show me the way to find/buy/look the modems and test one's futures. May be you
have E-mail address some persons or companys which can help me or with whom I 
can discuss my problem? Please, send me netmail reply, if you don't mind. Any 
information will be highly appreciated. Thank you
in advance!

        Best regards,
        Alexey Sen
        Internet:  black@gate.dialnet.msk.su
        Fidonet: 2:5000/7

--- GEcho/beta
 * Origin: Open City, Novosibirsk, voice 383-232-9047 (2:5000/7)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: puma <puma@halcyon.com>
Subject: Re: USR Sportster Wanted..
Originator: bbs@halcyon.com
Organization: organized??  me??
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 03:49:59 GMT

gerrit@laosinh.stgt.sub.org (Gerrit Heitsch) writes:
> USR supports only Class 1, all other manufacturers implement Class 2.
> This means, that you cannot use the FAX capability of a USR modem
> with one of the available programs like WinFAX, GPFAX... and the
> software USR supplies runs only under MS-DOS... :-(
> 

It's not the ONLY class 1 - most of the modems I've had a chance to
test are class 1, the supra being a class 2...
And class 1 modems work with WINFAX PRO just fine.
Many manufacturers have been reluctant to adopt class 2 because 
the current 'class 2' is a pre-release version.  The official
class 2 has just finished the approval process.
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: tellab5!mcdchg!marcal!labrnth!pbrooks@uunet.UU.NET (Peter Brooks)
Subject: Any info on Intel v.32bis, v.42 external modems
Organization: Labrynth Techonologies, Inc.
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 17:02:40 CST
X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA27168; Tue, 22 Dec 92 23:08:15 -0800
X-Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA02423; Tue, 22 Dec 92 23:08:14 -0800
X-Received: from uunet.uu.net (via LOCALHOST.UU.NET) by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA23760; Wed, 23 Dec 92 02:08:12 -0500
X-Received: from tellab5.UUCP by uunet.uu.net with UUCP/RMAIL
	(queueing-rmail) id 020752.4063; Wed, 23 Dec 1992 02:07:52 EST
X-Received: from mcdchg by tellab5.tellabs.com with uucp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #5) id m0n4O4T-0003qAC; Tue, 22 Dec 92 22:51 CST
X-Received: from marcal by mcdchg.chg.mcd.mot.com with uucp
	(Smail3.1.26.7 #2) id m0n4Nyh-000E7cC; Tue, 22 Dec 92 22:45 CST
X-Received: by marcal.marcal.com
	(16.6/16.2) id AA08441; Tue, 22 Dec 92 16:07:58 -0600
X-Received: from labrnth with uucp; Tue,, Dec 22 T 92 17:04:55
X-Received: by labrnth.uucp (1.65/waf)
	via UUCP; Tue, 22 Dec 92 17:04:55 CST
	for comp.dcom.modems.usenet@decwrl.dec.com
X-To: comp.dcom.modems.usenet

Does anyone have any experience witht the Intel v.32bis external modems? 
I am thinking of buying one since I can get quite a good price on it. 
will be using it to talk to a Telebit WorldBlazer quite a bit so am 
interested in compatibility with it. Also, does anyone have any 
experience with the Qblazers? Any info would be appreciated. 
Thanks.

Peter Brooks

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: danr@ais.org (Daniel Romanchik)
Subject: Getting Started With a 14.4 kbaud Modem
Organization: UMCC
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 01:51:07 GMT

I am going to be writing an article on getting started with a
high-speed modem.  This is going to be aimed at fairly
non-sophisticated users, and will be a collection of tips.  For
example, one of the things I plan to cover is that high-speed modems
generally take longer to connect than slower modems because it takes
more time for them to negotiate the link with the modem on the other
end.

So, if any of you have any tips or experiences that you would like me
to include, please e-mail them to me.  I'll post a summary of the
responses, or if the publisher is willing, I'll post the entire
article to the net.

Regards, Dan
From: jfrost@crash.cts.com (Julian Frost)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Help, please!
Date: 25 Dec 92 19:01:12 GMT
Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA

In article <2.5000.7.Fidonet.org.b1907e5d@che.nsk.su> Alexey.Sen@p0.f7.n5000.z2.fidonet.org writes:
>Hello All!
>Will you help me?
>The matter is I look for info about radiomodem which can
>help us to create RadioMail communications between number of ships with IBM-
>compatible computers on boards. Is there anywhere modems like this? Can you
>show me the way to find/buy/look the modems and test one's futures. May be you
>have E-mail address some persons or companys which can help me or with whom I 
>can discuss my problem? Please, send me netmail reply, if you don't mind. Any 
>information will be highly appreciated. Thank you
>in advance!
>
>        Best regards,
>        Alexey Sen
>        Internet:  black@gate.dialnet.msk.su
>        Fidonet: 2:5000/7
>
There are plenty of Amateur Radio TNCs around which are designed to be
used with radio equipment.  They allow you to send Packet (AX.25),
Radio Teletype (RTTY), AMTOR (error correcting RTTY), and ASCII.  You
might want to try looking into these.  Common TNCs are the Kantronics
All Mode (KAM), AEA's PK-232MBX.  Both of these have built in
mailboxes which means you can save messages in them for you, or other
users, which can then be retrieved at a later time.  
Hope this helps.  Merry Christmas.  Julian
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: KRC@ECLX.PSU.EDU (Keith R. Connors)
Subject: Re: Frontdoor, Supra FAX & Software.
Organization: Penn State Engineering Computer Lab
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 07:23:16 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

In <1992Dec25.103624.1102@rulway.LeidenUniv.nl> jeroenp@rulfc1.LeidenUniv.nl writes:

> In article <-071Henqkb@atlantis.psu.edu> KRC@ECLX.PSU.EDU (Keith R. Connors) writes:
> >I apologize if this has been asked before but I couldn't find an answer
> >anywhere else.  What I would like to do is have the ability to pass a FAX call
> >from Frontdoor to FAX software to receive the incoming FAX.  I have my modem
> 
> Please also post here, as I'd like to know mode/software combinations
> that can do this.
> 
> I heard rumours that ZyXEL is one of the few that can do it, as it keeps
> the carrier high on a FAX connect, but as it is a rumour, I want to have
> it confirmed.
> 
> --
> jeroen                             voice: +31-2522-20908 (19:00-23:00 UTC)
>                                    snail: P.O. Box 266
> jeroenp@rulfc1.LeidenUniv.nl              2170 AG Sassenheim
> jeroen_pluimers@f256.n281.z2.fidonet.org  The Netherlands

There are several people that have been talking in the FDECHO on Fidonet, that
have done that succesfully with the ZyXel modems.  Unfortunately that is the
only modem I have heard of that will do it at this time....

Keith Connors
krc@eclx.psu.edu
From: dkw@wolferts.ka.sub.org (Dr. Klaus Wolferts)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Fax resolution (was Re: Problem with WinFAX PRO fixed)
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 92 14:14:15 MEZ
Organization: Ing'Buro f. EDV + Elektronik, D-7500 Karlsruhe 31

mossako@obelix.uni-muenster.de (Martin Mossakowski) writes:

> Does someone know what the normal resolution for a paper fax is?

Horizontal:  8  Pixel/mm or 203 lpi
Vertical:    3.85 lpmm   or  98 lpi in normal
             7.7  lpmm   or 196 lpi in fine mode
           (15.4  lpmm   or 384 lpi in super fine mode for some devices)

Klaus
 ____    __  __  __    __   __
|    \  |  |/ / |  | /|  | / / Dr.-Ing. Klaus Wolferts: dkw@wolferts.ka.sub.org
|  |  | |  | /  |  |/ |  |/ / Ing'Buro f. EDV + Elektronik  
| d|  | | k| \  | w| /|  | / Mitteltorstr. 45,            Phone: +49 721 706016
|____/  |__|\_\ |__|/ |__|/ D-7500 Karlsruhe 31, Germany,  4903'02"N 822'58"EE
From: halgas@mvax.uakom.cs
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: MNP5 software emulation
Date: 21 Dec 92 10:34:15 +0100
Distribution: world
Organization: Institute of Automation and Communication

Hello,
Could someone give me any suggestions for public domain programs
that are doing MNP5 software emulation. And possibly a ftp site
where can I find them.
Thanks.
	Peter Halgas