From: jjd1@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Subject: Re: Kiran Wagle (from Prakash)
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 13:40:58 GMT

In article <1992Sep2.023608.2311@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> oldman@coos.dartmouth.edu (Prakash Das) writes:
>Hi all :-)
>
>To those of you who have been wondering why I haven't posted
>any followup, the reason is simple: I haven't had any time 
>to do so. Meanwhile, I have been reading all those responses.
>Many of you failed to see my points, and a few have made comments
>like 
>
>(1) he wanted a little attention
>(2) he wanted to see his name bandied about
>(3) he thought KW was a female, and so....?????
>(4) he got pissed and flamed back
>........
>
>None of those deserve any answer from me, so I will let them pass.
>(Certainly, the most laughable one was (3)-- how does his gender
>matter to me????!!!!!). To the one who called me a "jerk", I can
>say in return that you must be a moron to call me that, but again
>I will let that pass. 
 
 Good thing you didn't talk about it.
 
>
>As to why I criticized Kiran's posting, I don't think I have to 
>repeat. I said whatever I had to say in my posting before. For 
>those who didn't get it, agreed with, found it without reason
>and so on, that's fine with me. You can feel whatver you want
>to, and I will feel whatever I want to. It so happened that
>I didn't like his postings, his preacher's style, and
 
 God I hate preachy people. Huh Prakash?
 
>posting and replying to nearly everything and anything. You can 
>see for example that it is very easy for me too to post on
>the net my responses to every other response to mine (but I
>did not).  
 
 I don't think you even mentioned one.
 
>
>So why post on the net, instead of an email? The answer: I thought
>it more appropriate for it to be on the net than thru' email. So
 
 Heavens you wouldn't want to attack someone's personnal style,
personnally, like in person. I must compliment you on your logic
trail. It's sorta curvaceous.
 
>why read them if I don't like them? This is not a good enough
>suggestion. It's like saying, if you don't like the candidates,
>then don't vote. Not everyone can/is willling to run for office,
>this doesn't mean nobody "flames" them. No need to elaborate,
 
 Could you maybe explain for the stupid people like me?
 
>you get the point.
>
 
NO
 
>(Someone wanted to know what postings/style I would like to see
>Kiran write. Obviously this is not for me to say. I just pointed
>out what I *didn't* like in his postings/style......Yet another
>said I was hypocritical because I seemed to use the very
>style that I was criticizing. Well, I was trying to make that a 
>comment in itself!) 
 
Uh huh. Yea. 
 

>
>Why was I so riled? After all, it's just some postings, but then
>again I do spend time reading them, so.....I think you can get 
>what I am trying to say.
>
 
 Don't you hate the way on bozo circus they always talk to the kid
right before bucket # 6. Just to make him nervous. GOD that gets me
riled. I can't tell you how many TV's I've gone through.
 
>(Personally I lurk because as JMF said in a previous post, I
>generally don't have the time to post and reply to everything.
>But if everybody was like us, then there would be no postings,
>so thanks to all those who take the time to do so. Keep
>going, folks!)
>
 
 Whooo, Thanks. I was this close to stopping (). Thank you Prakash.
Your like a god to me. Really.
 
>Now I am ready to take that nice girl to picnic!
>
 
 The stud man. The prakmeister. Give it a go. Wink wink.
 Prakash my man one last question. There's this security guard where
I work and she always smiles at me in the morning. I know she does
this just to irritate me. I notice she has a gun. What should I do?
 
>-PD

 
================================================================================
 Sesquipedalian's 'R' Us. ZX-10. DoD#564. There ain't no more.
================================================================================
Newsgroups: soc.singles