HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: cc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Chris Cooke)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british,soc.culture.celtic
Subject: Re: Last King of Scotland (was Dates 1603, 1688, and 1707)
Date: 18 Dec 92 11:21:30 GMT
	<BzD3xp.60w@newcastle.ac.uk> <1992Dec16.225019.1846@coe.montana.edu>
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, Scotland

In article <1992Dec16.225019.1846@coe.montana.edu> uesu03@giac1.oscs.montana.edu (Lou Glassy) writes:

   If the Scottish people *truly* did *not* want to play ball in the
   European arena, is there any (peaceful|political) mechanism in place to
   allow them not to?

No.

   In other words, if the majority of voting Scots didn't want Maastricht,
   could they prevent Scotland from going in the kettle with the rest of
   the UK?

No.

   I ask this, because I'm still unclear as to the nature of the
   Scottish-- English political connection.  I know Scotland has some
   degree of home rule, and its own legal and education system (distinct
   from England's), but thought it [cannot][does not] have its own foreign
   policy, any more than say, a state in the USA would have a 'foreign
   policy' distinct from that of the US Federal government...

Scotland has no home rule at all.  We have "administrative devolution", which
means that the UK government stations some of its civil servants in Edinburgh
rather than in London, and hands over responsibility for Scottish matters to
them; but they're still directly controlled by the UK government.  Scottish
education and Scots law are under the control of the UK government and these
civil servants.  There is no Scottish parliament or assembly of any kind -
the closest we have is the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland.
Scottish political influence in the UK parliament is minimal - it's only
significant when Scotland happens to vote the same way as the rest of the UK,
and that hasn't happened for several elections now.
--
	-- Chris. 	cc@dcs.ed.ac.uk   (on Janet, cc@uk.ac.ed.dcs)
From: chorley@vms.ocom.okstate.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
Subject: request for songs
Date: 18 Dec 92 19:47:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: vms.1992Dec18.134724.1
Organization: OSU College of Osteopathic Medicine

Request for old stuff:

Does anyone have Stanley Holloway's King Harold
("With his eye full o' arra'
On 'is 'orse, with 'is  'awk in 'is 'and)
poem?

How about the words to "my old man's a dustman"

Or "On the Road to Mandalay" (is that Kipling?-exceedingly good)

{more stuff deleted to save bandwidth}

D.Chorley, in exile in Oklahoma
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
From: pmoloney@maths.tcd.ie (Paul Moloney)
Subject: Re: Charles & Di split?
Organization: Somewhere in the Twentieth Century
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 11:02:10 GMT

hallam@zeus02.desy.de (Phill Hallam-Baker) writes:

>After a few false starts which
>produced disparate by-products including the mangle, the "missionary size"
>canibals cooking pot and the rotary egg wisk a solution was found. Although it
>is not possible to give precise details of the mechanism under the Official
>Secrets act, it is possible to reveal that the Royal family now reproduce
>a-sexualy by binary cell division.

Rubbish, Don't believe a word of it. You only have to take one look at
Charles and Andrew to realise they still breed.

Or inbreed, even. Didn't the little tyke have his ears pinned back or
something? I mean, why didn't Charles just save the money by marrying someone
he wasn't related to?

P.
-- 
moorcockheathersiainbankshamandcornpizzapjorourkebluesbrothersspikeleepratchett
clive  P a u l   M o l o n e y    "I'm pretty witty and you're itty bitty    pe
james  Trinity College, Dublin     And isn't it a pity the city can't see?   vr
brownbladerunnerorsonscottcardprincewatchmenkatebushbatmanthekillingjoketolkien
Xref: sparky soc.culture.british:17677 soc.culture.celtic:8240
From: dam@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (David Morning)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british,soc.culture.celtic
Subject: Re: The Scottish National Anthem
Date: 17 Dec 92 11:18:01 GMT
Organization: Glasgow University Computing Science Dept.

ray@philmtl.philips.ca (Ray Dunn) writes:

>To tie this in with a previous thread, has the brainwashing in Scottish
>schools against Scottish dialect and all things Scottish, finally
>succeeded?

No. They're now feeding us Gaelic with no subtitles on TV at prime
time.

>Get off your buts and stop moaning about being hard done by and running
>down a culture that you should be justly proud of, one of the richest
>popular cultures of any nation.

They're moaning about a couple of terrible songs which happen to be Scottish.
As has been pointed out, there are plenty of better songs than these like:-

"Will ye stoap yer ticklin Jock"
"Bonny wee Jeannie McCall"
"The day we went to Rothsay-oh"
"Nobody's Child"
"Roamin in the gloamin"

and many other fine songs which are surely much better candidates for the
Scottish national anthem than the two previously mentioned.

Dave
-- 
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
From: jac54@cas.org ()
Subject: Re: Binary fission, was Re: Charles & Di split?
Organization: Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 16:56:24 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.135645.3923@nuscc.nus.sg> hiscrp@nuscc.nus.sg (C R Pennell) writes:
>jac54@cas.org () writes:
>: In article <Bz8puq.9rI@dscomsa.desy.de> Hallam@zeus02.desy.de writes:
>: >
>: >The the dreary German crew came in and Queen Vicky set up shop. Since she was
>: >not to keen on lying back and thinking of Knaresborough she had the finest minds
>: >of the age of invention think up a solution. After a few false starts...
>: >... it is possible to reveal that the Royal family now reproduce
>: >a-sexualy by binary cell division.
>: >
>:
>:      This is called "parthenogenesis" from the ancient Greek for
>:      "degree in Arcitecture".  A former colleague demonstrated that
>:      this was the case for sea anemones he picked up whilst wandering
>:      about the low-water mark at St. Andrews after the pubs had shut.
>:
>:      There is evidently greater sophistication in the Saxe-Coburg
>:      mechanism.  The basic mechanism would lead to an unbroken line
>:      of Queen Victorias.
>
>       Are you sure they don't reproduce by cold fusion?
>
	Sea-anemones are, of course, cold-blooded and gametic fusion
	is possible at low temperatures.  As for the royal family, I
	believe that...mmmmmmmph...

	...struggle..struggle... thud...

	Security Service in charge now, thus perish all enemies of the
	Queen.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british,soc.culture.celtic
From: walker@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Graham Walker, 227 West Old Main,268-3847,)
Subject: Re: The story of the Scottish flag
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 16:14:10 GMT

From article <katherim.724126396@sfu.ca>, by katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason):
> 
> Perhaps I am overly touchy on this subject.  A large part of it however
> is due to the fact that the reason I am living in Canada now and not
> in Scotland was due to Oliver Cromwell.
> 
> Katherine Merle Mason
> Ne Oublie.... 

You MUST be old.

		GW

Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
From: godfrey@vxdesy.desy.de
Subject: Re: Gerry prayer corner
Organization: (DESY, Hamburg, Germany)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 19:20:45 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.144439.12582@pixel.kodak.com>, dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com (Dave Jones) writes:
> That does it.  This avatar of Laurence is going in the kill file...
> 
> --
> ||------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ||Dave Jones (dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com)|Eastman Kodak Co. Rochester, NY  |

I think avatar might not be the word you're looking for.  Why do you find
it necessary to announce when you're putting names into your kill file?
Could it be that the main reason for putting them in the file is for the
pleasure of being able to announce it?

Laurence

Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
From: prodger@leland.Stanford.EDU (phillip prodger)
Subject: Re: Hooters
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 23:07:16 GMT

In article <1992Dec16.130124.17369@osf.org> sp@osf.org (Simon Patience) writes:
>In article <BzBs3q.3zo@ecf.toronto.edu>, ambidge@ecf.toronto.edu (Chris Ambidge) writes:
>> Methinks we have another case of "divided by a common language" 
>> here, as we have just observed with "pecker"
>> 
>> In North America, "hooters" is a vernacular term for female breasts.
>> I had not  made the connection until I read this, but "hooter" did
>> refer to one's nose when I was in school playgrounds in England.

The other day a woman I work with was commenting on the get-up-go attitude
of a coworker.  Quoth she:  She has a 'spunky fanny' (i.e. energetic backside 
or loosely 'she's hard working')

1.	OK, this is dumb in any language.

2.	Obscene in some quarters...


Newsgroups: soc.culture.british,soc.culture.celtic
From: erich@wubios.wustl.edu (Erich Schraer)
Subject: Re: The story of the Scottish flag
Organization: Division of Biostatistics, WUMS, St. Louis, MO
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 19:47:35 GMT

In article <1992Dec14.161941.28389@news.clarkson.edu> walker@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Graham Walker, 227 West Old Main,268-3847,) writes:

>And Edgar (wasn't his nick name the Maiden), and of course Duncan, and Donal
>Bane(sp?), and Kenneth., and MacBeth (what was his first name?).

MacBeth's first name was Macbeth, or in the Gaelic of the period,                                                                                                        GW
Macbethad (Modern Scottish Gaelic Macbeatha or Macbheatha).  In the Old
to Middle Irish periods it was quite common to have names beginning with
`mac', `mael', etc. followed by a name (usually a saint's) or other noun
in the genitive.  The name Macbethad means `son of life', and was not
uncommon at the time.  I've seen his name in old synchronisms as
Macbethad mac Finnlaich (sp?), since his father was Finnlaech mac
Ruaidri, mormaor of Moray.
				--Erich
--
  / Erich Schraer                               St. Louis, MO  63110 \
 /  Division of Biostatistics                 erich@wubios.wustl.edu  \
 \  Washington University School of Medicine    Voice: (314)362-3681  /
  \ 660 S. Euclid Ave., Box 8067                  Fax: (314)362-2693 /
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
From: katherim@fraser.sfu.ca (Katherine Merle Mason)
Subject: An ENGLISH monarch??
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:06:15 GMT

I have a question.  I have been studying Scottish history for a while,
and, in Canada at least, this necessarily entails studying a wee bit
of English history.

My question is simple:  has there ever been an ENGLISH monarch?

The Plantegenets were french.
The Tudors were Welsh.
The Stuarts were Scottish
The Windsors (were) are German.

Any ENGLISH monarchs?
Even in some other country??

Inquisitively yours,
Katherine Merle Mason
Ne Oublie....


Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
From: trk@palm15.cray.com (Tim Kirby)
Subject: Re: Green cards
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: 19 Dec 92 00:12:03 CST

zoran siveski fac ee (zoran@hertz.njit.edu) wrote:
: In article <1992Dec17.215840.21427@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> ckp2n@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Christina Powell) writes:
: >
: >P.S.  Don't plan on getting your wallet stolen.  INS will treated
: >YOU like the criminal.  I had to take my mom to deal with them in
: >just such a situation, and up to the time she decided to become
: >an American citizen (1989, about 9 years after the theft), she got 
: >hassles about it.
: 
: Rather don't plan on carrying your "green card" with you (unless you
: travel abroad, of course.) You are not required by the law to do it.

Bzzzzzt. Well, sort of. It rather depends on how you want to interpret the
following text which was on the paperwork which came with my shiny new
pink card earlier this year (I just happen to have it on file):

     Enclosed is your identification card.
     The law requires that you keep this card in your posession at all times.

The operative word is "posession". It is (possibly) arguable that keeping the
card in a safe deposit box at the bank is "keeping it in your posession".

Unfortunately, the only way you'll get this one verified is to ask the INS ...
and if they are as reliable as the IRS help, your probability of getting the
correct answer are ... well, less than 100%.

Did anyone else see the "worst voice mail in the country" survey earlier this
year ? The INS phone line won by a phenomenal margin over the next worst
offender (I guess you really have to try it to understand why ,,, ;-)

Tim

--
Tim Kirby --------- Cray Research Inc., Eagan, MN, USA ----------- trk@cray.com
Disclaimer: I disclaim, therefore I am. Cray Research is not responsible for me,
my views or anything I say ............... They do, however, pay my mortgage ;-)
When all else fails, Immortality may always be assured by spectacular error(JKG)
From: martin.baines@uk.sun.com (Martin Baines - Sun UK - SE Manager Cambridge)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: Banned: ``Happy Holidays'' [sic]
Date: 17 Dec 1992 11:03:02 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems Ltd
Distribution: world
Reply-To: martin.baines@uk.sun.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: bottomdog.uk.sun.com

In article r41m@lynx.unm.edu, Mark Platt <MPLATT@MEDUSA.UNM.EDU> () writes:
>In article <128030003@otter.hpl.hp.com> Andrew Farmer,
>arf@otter.hpl.hp.com writes:
>>	Bah! Humbug!
>
>good old Tim Oldham, yes tim it is Xmas in England one good reason that
>england has a way of making all other religions feel worthless, after 6
>years of being beaten up as a "YID" at a fairly good grammer school I can
>safely say that the attitude its Xmas I'm the majority and stuff it you
>lot is fairly typical of what I encountered from my school "chums" it may
>be PC to say happy holidays but it does acknowledge that there are some
>others in the world carry on with your merry Xmas though it makes me
>remmeber my school days

Surely its better to encourage knowledge of each others beliefs than
try to avoid the issue with PC platitudes. Much better to celebrate
Christmas and Honniker (sp?) and other religions major festivals.
IMHO Singapore (which has *lot* of different belief sets) has got
it abour right: the major festivals of Christians, Muslims, Hindus
Confusions and Teoist are all celibrated. Of course being Singapore
most people just work on through...

Or for a good time, visit a British city (e.g Leicester) with a large
Hindu population during Duwali (sp?): great fun.

Personally, I'm an atheist and find all the religious beliefs
"quaint", but I know a good excuse for a party when I see one!

Martin

---
"You might say that, but I couldn't possibly comment"

Martin Baines, Sales Support Manager,
Sun Microsystems Ltd, 306 Science Park, Cambridge, CB4 4WG, UK
Phone: +44 223 420421                 Fax: +44 223 420257
JANET:     Martin.Baines@uk.co.sun    Other UK:  Martin.Baines@sun.co.uk
Internet:  Martin.Baines@UK.sun.com
X.400:     g=martin s=baines prmd=sunir admd=mci c=us
From: mmh@dcs.qmw.ac.uk (Matthew Huntbach)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: An ENGLISH monarch??
Date: 18 Dec 92 19:05:47 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Dept, QMW, University of London, UK.

In article <1992Dec18.160900.7906@infodev.cam.ac.uk> gdb15@cl.cam.ac.uk writes:
>Of course, if we accept the principle of patriarchy, then the next
>King of England will be Greek...
>
But the Greek monarchy was itself German. "Phil the Greek" may
make a good joke, but I don't think the Greek monarchy was ever
anything more than a job creation scheme for spare
descendants of Queen Victoria. I'm not sure if it ever had any
real Hellenic gene content.

Matthew Huntbach
From: oughton@chopin.udel.edu (Sean Oughton)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: U.K. --> N. American voltage transformers and plugs
Keywords: voltage transformers, plug adaptors
Date: 20 Dec 92 20:33:34 GMT
Organization: University of Delaware

In the same vein, what exactly is the deal with the 50/60 Hz frequency
conversion?  I'll be moving from the states to scotland in a few
months and I have one of those cd/cassete boom boxes that I'd like
to take with me. 

If the thing only uses DC current internally, then it seems to me that
the freq shouldn't matter; if not, then the timing for the CD player
(the only part I really care about) will probably be thrown off.

Anyone have experience/ideas with/on the matter?

        sean@bartol.udel.edu
From: dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com (Dave Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: Banned: ``Happy Holidays'' [sic]
Date: 15 Dec 92 15:13:01 GMT
Distribution: soc
Organization: Vonnegut Tent Rentals, Inc.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]

Tim Oldham (tjo@its.bt.co.uk) wrote:
> In article <suplick.724377812@mikey> suplick@convex.com (Jean Suplick) writes:
> >Happy holidays!  ;-)
> 
> I propose that this phrase be banned from this newsgroup. Acceptable 
> phrases are ``Happy Christmas'', ``Merry Christmas'', ``A Very Happy
> New Year'', plus one or two similar phrases.
> 
> I don't know what the fuck you celebrate in December in other parts
> of the world, but in Britain and Northern Ireland it's Christmas and
> the New Year.
> 
> Wishing you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year,
> 
I heartily agree.  'Happy Holidays' is Political Correctness, pure and
simple.  It's widespread on this side of the pond because of the diversity 
of religions and the willingness to accomodate loudmouths who object to 
things they find objectionable.  In one state (I think it was Californica)
the authorities actually threatened teachers with disciplinary action if 
they mouthed anything religio-specific in the way of good wishes to their
pupils.  I hope somebody at least told them where they could put their 
threats.

Incidentally surveys indicate that 86% of US residents call themselves
Christian, about 8% profess no religion, 2% identify themselves as Jewish,
0.5% as Islamic, 0.4% Buddhist.  The numbers are a little skewed because the
original survey was 113 thousand people nationwide.

--
||------------------------------------------------------------------------
||Dave Jones (dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com)|Eastman Kodak Co. Rochester, NY  |
From: graham@otago.ac.nz
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: Banned: ``Happy Holidays'' [sic]
Date: 16 Dec 92 13:47:01 +1300
Distribution: soc
Organization: University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

In article <1992Dec15.123843.13440@its.bt.co.uk>, tjo@its.bt.co.uk (Tim Oldham) writes:
> In article <suplick.724377812@mikey> suplick@convex.com (Jean Suplick) writes:
>>Happy holidays!  ;-)
> 
> I propose that this phrase be banned from this newsgroup. Acceptable 
> phrases are ``Happy Christmas'', ``Merry Christmas'', ``A Very Happy
> New Year'', plus one or two similar phrases.
> 
> I don't know what the fuck you celebrate in December in other parts
> of the world, but in Britain and Northern Ireland it's Christmas and
> the New Year.
> 
> Wishing you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year,
> 

Xmas & New Year are holidays so 'Happy summer holidays'.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
From: jlloyd@cc.uow.edu.au (Jonathan Lloyd)
Subject: Re: game (no prizes)
Organization: University Of Wollongong
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 92 23:32:40 GMT

hiscrp@nuscc.nus.sg (C R Pennell) writes:

>	PRESENTING THE SOC.CULTURE.BRITISH CHRISTMAS COMPETITION


>A certain Wendell writes:
>	I understand that prior to being sworn in as a U.S.
>	citizen, the applicant is interviewed and is expected to
>	answer a few questions about American government, history,
>	and the like.  . . 

>Now, British culture enthusiasts:
>	Imagine you had to design a test of a similar nature for 
>someone (say a Bosnian, or a Burmese or an American) who was applying for
>British citizenship and had to show their grasp of British culture. What
>TEN questions would you ask.

OK Here goes!

1. What are the capital cities of Wales and Scotland?

2. In what year was the Falklands war fought?

3. Who is 2nd in line to the throne at present?

4. Name 3 leading London soccer clubs.

5. What is the name of the building where parliament is housed?

6. Is a pork pie normally served hot or cold?

7. Name one of the "Goons".

8. How many players are normally fielded in a rugby union team?

9. Who was the first woman leader of the opposition?

10. What is the name of the long running BBC weekly pop music TV programme?

How about a pass mark of 5 out of 10?

-Jonathan.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
From: sp@osf.org (Simon Patience)
Subject: Re: If the Wales' divorce
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 14:27:10 GMT

In article <1992Dec15.130706.3996@spider.co.uk>, alisonjw@spider.co.uk (Alison J Wyld) writes:
> In article <1992Dec11.065729.24255@osf.org> sp@osf.org (Simon Patience) writes:
> >
> >Even more overdue when you consider that there are more catholics that
> >regularly attend church than c-of-e in Britain and neither of these groups
> >can muster as much as 2% of the population. (1.7 cofe, 1.9 cath, source
> >Economist disclaimer: working from memory)
> >
> 
> Does the CofE figure apply to England, or Britain.  If the latter, its
> bound to be skewed by the fact the the CofE doesn't exist in the other
> componant countries.  

Who cares. Even if it is twice that at a staggering 3.4% it still a piss
poor number and still less than the Muslims.

> Btw.  The Monarch does not have to be head of an Established church.
> The Church of Scotland is the Established church in Scotland (whatever
> that means), and the monarch is very definately not the head. 

Who cares about the monarch being the head of the church. I and
complaining more about the fact that the church is established. The
monarch can belong to any club he/she wants and if they want hi/her to be
chief waller then thats fine by me, just keep it out of my life.

Simon.

-- 
  Simon Patience
  Open Software Foundation			Phone: +33-76-63-48-72
  Research Institute				FAX:   +33-76-51-05-32
  2 Avenue De Vignate				Email: sp@gr.osf.org
  38610 Gieres, France				       uunet!gr.osf.org!sp
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
From: hiscrp@nuscc.nus.sg (C R Pennell)
Subject: Re: Gerry prayer corner
Organization: National University of Singapore
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 12:01:18 GMT


2893684@QUCDN.QueensU.CA (Andy) writes:

Or in his case does not. ANdy takes exception to a part of Godfrey's post
(well he may take exception to all of it but this is what he actually
replies to:)

[		[Immense quantities deleted]
: >I did not call for the destruction of Germans, I simply said that the German
: >nationality and language should not have been allowed to continue after
: >WW2.  I didn't say anything about killing anyone.
: 
: Yes of course, instead of comparing Laurence to a Nazi, he should be compared
: to a member of the Inquisition who merely seeks to convert all Jews and destroy
: their nationality, sorry for missing the distinction.

	That's it: 3 lines of comment nothing else. [I've deleted the rest of
the various cross-postings to save space] But to make this point he leaves
in 135 (one hundred and thirty five) lines according to my news reader (I
can't be bothered to count them.) Has the man no manners?

Still it's nice to see LG hasn't been cut off from the nets by his opponents.	
Bet they never thought they'd see him back (I was getting worried myself)
Still no-one ever expects the Spanish Inquisition, eh?

Richard Pennell History NUS
From: huw@castle.ed.ac.uk (H G J Evans)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: Last Names
Date: 16 Dec 92 11:49:25 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

In article <1992Dec14.185604.24619@nctams1.uucp> n36c@pnet16.cts.com (Rm1 Straight) writes:
>Without causing disrespect, can anyone tell me the last name of the Royal
>family. It would be greatly appreciated.


The name of the current Royal family is Windsor. It was changed from
Saxe-Coburg Gothe (something like that, I think) earlier this century,
when having a German name didn't seem like such a good idea.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%Huw Evans          huw@castle.ed.ac.uk     %
%                   huw@maths.ed.ac.uk      %
%                   Tel.  +44 (0)31-650-5067%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%