HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jmccorm@a.cs.okstate.edu (MCCORMICK JOSHUA C)
Subject: Re: PPI EPROMS (Re: PPI repair charges)
Organization: Oklahoma State University
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 93 04:27:29 GMT

From article <1993Jan6.214143.16724@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>, by jemartin@nyx.cs.du.edu (John Martin):

>>A suggestion:  Do NOT send your old EPROM back immediately.  PPI is not
>>really going to notice.  Run for a week with your new EPROM to make sure it
>>works.  Put it through its paces.  Once you're satisfied it's fine, send
>>back the old one.  This way, if the new one has a problem, you're not up
>>the creek.

I recently heard from a friend that he's now getting only MNP 4 connects from 
HST D/S modems with the new ROM. Can someone confirm?

-- 
jmccorm@a.cs.okstate.edu
                                   ### ####  #### *---------------------------*
*--This space intentionally--*     ### ##########     Fight-O-Net address:
*-designed to waste taxpayer-* ### ### ### ## ###   Josh McCormick @ 1:3814/0
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: qb7g6@fel.tno.nl (Maarten Landzaat)
Subject: What IS v.32,v.42(bis) etc?
Organization: TNO Physics and Electronics Laboratory
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 10:05:03 GMT

Sorry to waste bandwidth with my ignorance, but I'm totally blank on
modems. I have a Starteam 1200 something, and use it for a newly set up
UUCP news/email link over a ordinary telephone line. 
You can imagine that's kind of slow.
So I'm looking for a faster modem, but I get lost in the descriptions of
those modems.

Can anybody please enlighten me on those v.32 etc. codes? I presume
they're names of standards, but I'd like to know a little more detail.
Do they have a one to one relation with baudrate?

A very rough price indication will also be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks!

-- 
Maarten J. Landzaat (analyst/programmer, bass player, Atari/midi freak)
BSO/Aerospace & Systems			Mail: Spuistraat 97
Email: maarten.landzaat@fel.tno.nl	      1012 SV  Amsterdam
Phone: +31 20 6266098			      The Netherlands
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.laptops
From: oppedahl@panix.com (Carl Oppedahl)
Subject: Re: WANTED: 9600 bps v.32/v.32bis/v.42/v.42bis Pocket Modem
Organization: PANIX Public Access Unix, NYC
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 05:55:29 GMT

In <1iasqvINNbg7@smurf.sti.com> westes@smurf.sti.com (Will Estes) writes:

>I need to get a fast pocket modem for use with a laptop.  If you have a
>9600 bps modem with the various v.32/v.42 bells and whistles for sale, please
>contact me by mail.  

>If you know of any magazine reviews of 9600 bps pocket modems, I would
>greatly appreciate the reference.


PC Week had a review in the December 28, 1992 issue of the Practical 
Peripherals PM14400 PKT.  They said it was great.  See my posting of 
earlier today to this group in which I mention it and one other that
is recommended to me.

Carl

-- 
Carl Oppedahl AA2KW  (intellectual property lawyer)
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY  10112-0228
voice 212-408-2578     fax 212-765-2519
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner)
Subject: Re: Zyxel types (was Re: ZyXEL as answering machine ? (PC-Software))
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 20:18:02 GMT

In article <1993Jan07.190357.12882@catfish.az05.bull.com> pls@cibecue.az05.bull.com (Paul Schauble) writes:
|How does the ZyXEL tell the computer about selective ringing? What does it
|say?

Right now, you can only tell the ZyXEL which ring cadences to pay attention
to and which to ignore, and it treats all of the cadences that it is listening
to the same as a normal ring.  However, ZyXEL USA tells me that they are
considering adding a way to return different result codes for different
rings.

  Bill
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: scottb@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com (TheLrdLovsAHngn)
Subject: Re: USR SPORTSTER ROM WRITE
Organization: United Technologies Research Center
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 23:56:43 GMT

I believe the rom command that you are looking for is:

atgw03c6,22gw05cd,2f

I dont think that this will work with the 4.2 rom.  Try issuing
that command and then type ATI4.  If the command worked, the 
USR Sportster modem should report that is has become a 16.8 
DS HST modem.  Let us all know what happens.
-- 
Disclaimer:  I didn't do it!  Nobody saw me do it!  You can't prove anything! 
             My opinions are my own.   They do not reflect anyone/thing else!
\/       preferred        \/
scottb%nw8550@utrcgw.utc.com            |           sdb@rcinet.utc.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Supra Roms Again
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 05:04:28 GMT
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange

In article <56AWB3H7@cc.swarthmore.edu> kennedy@cs.swarthmore.edu (Sean Kennedy) writes:
> 
> 	I know this has been posted before, but I lost the information.
> Does anyone know how to tell which roms a suprafaxmodem V.32bis modem has?

The manual explains this.
 
Failing reading the docs - you don't have any, right? - try ATI3 or 4 or 5.

Steve
-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand |      
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         |        Space for rent.
+64 4 478 4714                          |   - cheap rates, nice location. 
**** Happy user of OS/2 b2.1 ****       |
From: rigbs@essex.ac.uk
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: HELP! Sending characters before connecting with MS Terminal.
Date: 8 Jan 93 14:58:46 GMT
Reply-To: rigbs@essex.ac.uk ()
Organization: University of Essex, Colchester, UK

Hello folks,

I have a problem..

To gain access to my Universities computer system I must go 
through a Gandalf switch. This requires me to send a character
telling the switch the Bit / Parity I am using before the connection
is established.

My question to the group is how do I get my comms. software ( the
Windows Terminal program) to transmit a specific character BEFORE
a connection is established?

Please e-mail any possible solutions to me at :

	rigbs@essex.ac.uk .

Thank you for your time.

Simon K Rigby.
From: wrob@unixg.ubc.ca (Robert Wong)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Zyxel types (was Re: ZyXEL as answering machine ? (PC-Software))
Date: 6 Jan 1993 09:27:32 GMT
Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca

In article <1icv22INNr4k@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> banshee@cats.ucsc.edu (Wailer at the Gates of Dawn) writes:
>E model is std 14.4 fax modem
>S adds a nifty LCD front panel display and some more status indicators
>
>X+ models add a faster processor for better compression of voicemail.

I think the S models also support 4-wire leased line support.
 RWW.
-- 
Robert W. "What!?! I've-been-tying-my-shoelaces-backwards-all-my-life?" Wong Jr.
wrob@unixg.ubc.ca (ASCII only)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
From: earle@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Greg Earle - Gainfully Unemployed)
Subject: Re: WB Fax Upgrade
Followup-To: comp.dcom.modems
Organization: Gainfully unemployed
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 23:06:28 GMT

In article <C0GF1v.Eqt@news.rn.com> larry@news.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>>For what it's worth GNU has a FAX Modem server and it's FREE ...
>
>But if Telebit doesn't provide the register discriptions, it's of little
>use (If Telebit indeed did not supply a complete set of modem registers)

As I said, no they did not.  The Addendum basically describes the changes
to the AT commands and S registers that apply because of the new V.25bis
support, and some slight changes to the descriptions of some of the
registers (like S12 is now called "Delay For Prompt Message" instead of the
old "Escape Sequence Guard Time".  Gee, I wonder why that is?  (-: ).  In a
few cases, some enhancements have been added, e.g.. &Rx (RTS and CTS
Interpretation) has added additional &R5, &R6, &R7 and &R8 settings, and the
&R0 and &R2 settings have been changed.

There is no mention anywhere of AT commands or S register settings that
pertain to the facsimile capability.

--
	- Greg Earle				| Disclaimer: These are MY
	  Itinerant Sun Consultant		| opinions ONLY, not JPL's!
	  isolar!earle@elroy.JPL.NASA.GOV	| They just let me post through
	  (818) 353-8695			| their machines ...
From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: USR modems..
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 93 15:12:40 EST
Organization: Izot's Swamp

larry@news.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:

> I think both modems are excellent.  Neither modems gets my vote for fax.

   Me, neither!  Heck, all of the good FAX software I've ever used is based on 
the Quadram/Hayes JT-FAX board (say, anyone want some modem daughterboards for 
these suckers... I know someone who has dozens).

> USR is great for free firmware upgrades for the life of the modem even
> if enhancements are included.

   Really?  I have a 14.4 HST Dual Standard with V.32bis, firmware version 
1443.  Know of any upgrades? <grin>

  Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
                Now I've lost everything, I give to you my soul
           And the meaning of all that I believed before escapes me
                  In this world of none, no thing, and no one
                            - Genesis, _Afterglow_
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: avircams@solomon.technet.sg (Asia Matsushita)
Subject: WorldBlazer on Solbourne Workstations
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 10:56:22 GMT


Hi:

    We recently bought a Telebit WorldBlazer that we connect to the
standard port (ttyb) of our Solbourne 5/600 server, running OS/MP 4.1.1
(SunOS 4.1.1 compatible). The communication software used is PCOMM and
C-kermit 5A(188). We connect our modem to a remote machine that uses
Telebit's Qblazer. Both modem runs at V.32 with V.42bis. When we
try to upload and download files to/from the remote modem, we only
achieve a transfer rate of ~150-200cps. This figure is obtained from 
the statistical report in kermit. We then move our modem onto COM2 of 
our PC running MSKERMIT.  Guess what, we get a transfer rate of roughly 
1800cps. 
	Is there some problem with Solbourne's serial port or is it
because Solbourne is multitasking and PC is not? Can anyone give us some
suggestions? 
	Any information is welcomed. We will post a summary if there
is enough response. Thank you very much.


slim...
--
===============================================================
LIM SAU-TSIEN
Research Engineer                       Tel: 381-5486 (Office)
Video Research Group                            Fax: 285-7237
AV/Information Research Centre (AVIRC)  TLX: AMSHDC RS 20405

            E-mail: slim@avirc.ams.mei.co.jp
	 	    avircams@technet.solomon.sg
           BLK 1022, Hougang Avenue 1, #04-3526
        Tai Seng Industrial Estate, Singapore 1953
===============================================================
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster)
Subject: Re: US Robotics e-mail adress
Organization: Panix Public Access Internet & Unix, NYC
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 20:29:52 GMT

In article <1993Jan12.092424.287@mvax.uakom.cs> fabian@mvax.uakom.cs writes:
>Hi,
>does somebody know US Robotics e-mail adress ?


Why do you want it?
USR has stated here that they do not provide product support via email.


-- 
_______________________________Mike Schuster________________________________
NY Pub. Access UNIX/Internet: schuster@panix.com | 70346.1745@CompuServe.COM
The Portal (R) System: schuster@shell.portal.com | MCI Mail,GEnie: MSCHUSTER
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: jfw@technix.mn.org (Jerry Wallace)
Subject: Re: ZyXEL voice and flow control
Keywords: ZyXEL voice flow control
Organization: Private System - Saint Paul, MN
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 14:29:47 GMT

Robert Kimball writes about the ZyXEL modem properly decoding DTMF...

>I tried it with no success.  I will try again.  The modem has a real problem
>decoding DTMF on the phone I use for testing.  It can only decode the
>3, 6, 9, # keys...sort of.  I have another phone which produces long tones
>and the modem can decode those well.  I will try with that phone.

I use a Watson for my voice mail and I have noticed that some telephones
are much better at producing tones that Watson 'hears'.  Anything based
on a the old 2500 set works all the time, every time.  Some electronic
systems, esp. the ones that measure the length of the pulse, don't work
as well.  Experience has shown that if I cover the mouthpiece while sending
numbers, the decode works significantly better.  Perhaps the same things
affect the ZyXEL modem's ability to detect and decode DTMF.
-- 
Jerry Wallace                    TechNIX, Inc.
Electronic: jfw@technix.mn.org   Suite 103
  Acoustic: +1 612 645 7684      2301 Como Avenue
 Ballistic: Hah!                 Saint Paul, MN  55108
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: wolfgang@netcom.com (Wolfgang Henke)
Subject: Re: HELP: Digicom Scout+ and kermit
Organization: Netcom
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 17:51:28 GMT

Bill Neisius (bill@solaria) wrote:
: : at*o 
: : MODEL:SCOUT PLUS 
: : DTE:  57600  N81
: : DCE:  14400   V42b       
: : RECEIVE LEVEL= -36 DBM
: : 
: :  E1  K1  M1  Q0  V1  X4 TONE 
: :  &B0 &C1 &D3 &R2 &T5 
: :  *E1 *F3 *G1 *M2 *N2 *P0 *Q3 *S1 *T1  
: : 			
: : S00=001  S04=010  S08=002  S15=255 
: : S01=000  S05=008  S09=000  S18=000
: : S02=043  S06=002  S10=003  S25=000 
: : S03=013  S07=090  S12=050  S26=000 
: : OK                                 
: 
: That's strange... I thought *E1 was 'Auto reliable MNP5', yet the DCE shows
: a V42b connection.  And isn't *N2 'Modem connect rate=4800'? How did it
: connect at 14400?

You are right. I took the at*o from the Scout.txt file since it was the
only place I had it handy. Then I corrected some settings in the output.
Here is the original from Scout.txt:

--------- begin inclusion -----------

	How does one call under severly impaired line conditions? Here
	is an an example calling to JV Dialogue in Moskow via direct
	dialing from Palo Alto, CA.

	SysOp: Pete Kvitek    <kvitekp@jvd.msk.su>

Online to JV Dialogue, Moskow:  
at*o 
MODEL:SCOUT PLUS 
DTE:  57600  N81
DCE:  4800   MNP4            <-- V.32 at 4800 bps requires 16 db S/N only 
RECEIVE LEVEL= -36 DBM

 E1  K1  M1  Q0  V1  X4 TONE 
 &B0 &C1 &D3 &R2 &T5 
 *E1 *F3 *G1 *M2 *N2 *P0 *Q3 *S1 *T1  <-- *Q3 allows the modem full line
					  quality control
S00=001  S04=010  S08=002  S15=255 
S01=000  S05=008  S09=000  S18=000
S02=043  S06=002  S10=003  S25=000 
S03=013  S07=090  S12=050  S26=000 <-- S07 is doubled to 90 seconds to
OK                                     allow for the long dial completion 
ato                                    delay 
CONNECT 4800
EC/MNP4                 <-- with ato I go back from local modem
					 to online JV Dialogue
	Created : 05-12-1992

	I use V.32 with fallback to 4800 bps, because this protocol
	requires only 16 dbm signal-to-noise. It is not often that one
	can get through to Moskow, and when I do I want to be sure to
	connect. 

-------- end of inclusion -------------

-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
   Wolfgang Henke     Data lanes not car pool lanes      wolfgang@netcom.com
From: Lars_Jorgensen@p7.syntax.bbs.bad.se (Lars Jorgensen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Busy detect on new Supra BIOS set ??
Date: Tue,  5 Jan 93 22:36:28 +0000
Reply-To: Lars_Jorgensen@p7.syntax.bbs.bad.se (Lars Jorgensen)
Distribution: world
Organization: PC Point hos Syntax 
OD-Comment-To: Internet_Gateway

to: all

Is there a problem with busy detection on the new Supra chipset or can I do 
something ??


/Lars

+++ Author: Lars_Jorgensen@P7.Syntax.BBS.Bad.Se, Syntax BBS, Denmark

--- GoldED 2.41.B1207
From: trsnyder@mcs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: A Telebit FAX upgrade FLAME (Was: "Re: WB Fax Upgrade")
Date: 7 Jan 93 18:59:26 GMT
	<1993Jan6.052942.582@smoke.marlboro.vt.us>
	<1993Jan6.100623.15326@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
	<1993Jan6.182313.22435@news2.cis.umn.edu>
Organization: ASCI

In article <1993Jan6.182313.22435@news2.cis.umn.edu> alla0008@student.tc.umn.edu (Graham Allan) writes:

   You can get hold of documents describing the Class-1 and Class-2 protocols
   from several BBS's - I saw a copy which had originated from Supra.

Supra provides (unsupported, I believe) documentation on the fax commands that
they got from Rockwell on their BBS.

Bob
From: lars@spectrum.CMC.COM (Lars Poulsen)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Could somebody tell me the quality of Boca modems?
Date: 4 Jan 93 19:08:58 GMT
Organization: CMC Network Systems (Rockwell DCD), Santa Barbara, CA, USA

>>The BOCA has a 16550 installed on the internal version.

In article <C08FLw.3J3@hyperion.wright.edu>
   thanatos@hyperion.wright.edu (Terry Chlebek) writes:
>This is not correct.  The internal boca doesn't have ANY UART installed.
>It EMULATES only the 16450.  I have one and it can't reliably transfer
>at 14.4k in Windows 3.1 if you try to do anything else while the
>transfer is occuring.

The Rockwell reference firmware release V1.270 for the V.32(bis)
datapump has an enhanced UART emulation, which basically uses the V.42
packet buffer as a FIFO. This is even better than a real 16550A.
-- 
/ Lars Poulsen, SMTS Software Engineer	Internet E-mail: lars@CMC.COM
  CMC Network Products / Rockwell Int'l	Telephone: +1-805-968-4262	
  Santa Barbara, CA 93117-3083		TeleFAX:   +1-805-968-8256
From: bill@solaria (Bill Neisius)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: HELP: Digicom Scout+ and kermit
Date: 6 Jan 93 07:45:49 GMT
Reply-To: bill@solaria.hac.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Wolfgang Henke (wolfgang@netcom.com) wrote:
: Dennis Robinson (djr48312@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu) wrote:
: You seem to have a flowcontrol problem. Just looking at the regular
: AT*O output and the one you posted, it seems that many lines are just
: swallowed. The Scout+ uses hardware handshake by default. (AT*F3).
: Here is the regular AT*O printout so you can compare:
: 
: at*o 
: MODEL:SCOUT PLUS 
: DTE:  57600  N81
: DCE:  14400   V42b       
: RECEIVE LEVEL= -36 DBM
: 
:  E1  K1  M1  Q0  V1  X4 TONE 
:  &B0 &C1 &D3 &R2 &T5 
:  *E1 *F3 *G1 *M2 *N2 *P0 *Q3 *S1 *T1  
: 			
: S00=001  S04=010  S08=002  S15=255 
: S01=000  S05=008  S09=000  S18=000
: S02=043  S06=002  S10=003  S25=000 
: S03=013  S07=090  S12=050  S26=000 
: OK                                 

That's strange... I thought *E1 was 'Auto reliable MNP5', yet the DCE shows
a V42b connection.  And isn't *N2 'Modem connect rate=4800'? How did it
connect at 14400?

Bill Neisius
bill@solaria.hac.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: endesa@lascar.puc.cl (Eduardo Lucero)
Subject: Special Modem for a Cellular Phone ?
Organization: Club DataByte, Endesa
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 05:03:02 GMT

Hello Netlanders...
I plan to buy a fax/modem to use with a
laptop and a cellular phone.
Do I need a special modem?
Thanks in advance.

Eduardo Lucero
From: wolfgang@netcom.com (Wolfgang Henke)
Subject: Faxworks for OS/2
Organization: Netcom
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 05:29:57 GMT


Faxing from OS/2 with the Digicom Scout+ modem is supported now.
I received a call today from Joanne Taylor of Softnet in Atlanta.
She has arranged a special introductory offer. The fax program used
to be called PMFax, but was renamed to: FAXWORKS for OS/2. The list
price is $149, but if you call her at 1-800-432-9967 extension 253
she has a special offer of $99 for you.

I would like to thank the user who pointed out several months ago
that the Scout+ at the time was not supported by FAXWORKS for OS/2.





-- 
   _________________________________________________________________________
   Wolfgang Henke     Data lanes not car pool lanes      wolfgang@netcom.com 

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: jwright@nsc.nsc.com (John Wright)
Subject: New Voice/Data/Fax Modem from National Semiconductor
Keywords: Voice Data Fax
Organization: National Semiconductor, Santa Clara
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 19:24:58 GMT







Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gvb@telly.on.ca (George VandeBunte)
Subject: Re: Zyxel Distinctive Ring
Organization: Somewhere just far enough out of Toronto
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 18:17:56 GMT


 
In article <C0H1n0.KF9@cs.psu.edu> fenner@postscript.cs.psu.edu (Bill Fenner) 
>In article <C0GzCF.GK@unix.portal.com> ttolh@shell.portal.com (Todd N Tolhu
 
>|the ability of the modem to report *which* ring pattern
>|was detected.
>|
>|Is there a way to get the modem to report this, or might Zyxel consider
>|adding this function?
>
>I asked about adding this; they said they were evaluating the possibility.
>
>  Bill
 
<Hmmm... I hope they look favorably on the idea.  I'd like to use the
<ability to distinguish which line the incoming call is on in order
<to make the voice/fax/data decision.
 
We helped ZyXEL develop the Distinctive Ring feature.
 
The feature already supports the ability to tell you which ring
you are getting.   
 
The idea is that if you select only one type of ring, which
could include the regular ring, you only get the RING indicator
for the selected ring, and s0/s1 only works on the number of
distinctive rings received for this type of ring.
This has the advantage that it will work with most any program
on most any system,
because the program just does not know the phone is ringing 
unless it is the selected ring, and if it is the selected ring
the modem acts as if it is the only ring.
 
However, if you select multiple rings (up to 4), it tells you
which RING you are getting.   You get RING for the regular
ring;  RING 1 for each double ring; RING 2 and RING 3 for each
other rings.  Of course this is very useful for voice mail
applications, logging Caller ids etc.  Thus you need no extra
registers, etc .
 
I find that I also use it with CALL RETURN here in Canada. When the computer
calls a bbs that is busy, the computer can set 
CALL RETURN and answer in originate
mode if a RING 2. That way the line is not tied up.  Then there
are the call forward applications ...
 
NET NET,  do an ATS40=120 and you will be in business.
(may want to save in profile 0 at&w0).
 
Another aside-- Distinctive rings in the real world (north america)
often bear little resemblance to the distinctive rings specified
in Bellcore documents.  The ZyXEL  does well for rings in either world.
Final aside-- if the phone is manually answered in mid distinctive ring,
(woops excuse me I do go on sometimes).
 
NON DISCLAMER:  I work for a company OCOMP that supports/supplies 
ZyXEL modems  /etc( Callerid,voice,upgrades ) outside the US
(esp Canada)
gvb@telly.on.ca  416 5341508.
 
 
 
.

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de (Martin Cracauer)
Subject: Modem feature for good responses on interactive work ?
Organization: Hanse Networking e. V., Hamburg, Germany
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 09:12:22 GMT

I heard that some modems got a special feature to support interactive
work. Somethink like a modus the modem falls into and guarantees
excellent responses when hitting a key. USR seems to have it.

Could anybody tell me, what this is and which modems have it ?

-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauer <cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de>, WAVEDATA, Norderstedt, Germany
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: Rick_Engel@mindlink.bc.ca (Rick Engel)
Subject: Re: PPI EPROMS (Re: D/S connect problem)
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 04:13:34 GMT

        there are a few 16.8 DS boards around that I call and I haven't had
any problems yet, and that was with the 1.21c and 1.5m rom(s).

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: mckeeveb@monashee.sfu.ca (Gumby - The unknown user)
Subject: Re: Upgrading a ZyXEL 1496E to an E+
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 05:52:32 GMT

Zero_One@p101.f701.n202.z1.fidonet.org writes:

>There is no way possible that you can turn the E into an E+.

Why not?  If you're going to make such a blanket statement, please be
prepared to back it up.

-- 
    Rob McKeever  VE7ICJ  rmckeeve@sfu.ca  mckeeveb@sfu.ca  604-291-0457
"Do you know what standards are?  They're career paths for people who don't
 want to work!" - John Parkinson, Ernst & Young at the BCDMA Conference '92
       -*-          Standard Disclaimers should be adequate        -*-