HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: lauson@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Patrick W Lauson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: MICH: 60 something HOUSTON:7
Date: 28 Sep 92 18:01:34 GMT
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network

In article <1992Sep28.143609.15144@menudo.uh.edu> HADCRJAM@admin.uh.edu (MILLER, JIMMY A.) writes:
>In <1992Sep27.063101.5034@zip.eecs.umich.edu> sybesma@quip.eecs.umich.edu writes:
>
>> 
>> As far as the score,  it wasn't nearly that close.  Michigan sat on 
>> the ball the entire second half... Of course, what else do ya do 
>> when you're up 42-0.
>
>  If you're Houston, you keep throwing the ball downfield, trying to score some
>more points, demonstrating a total lack of class, and generating ill feelings
>that will come back and haunt you for years to come.
>
>
Did anybody else love it as much as I did when Michigan went for it on
4th down _3_ times in the 4th quarter?  I was hoping that they would have
the ball with like 5 seconds left so that they could throw a bomb into the
endzone.  I was also disappointed that I didn't see a post-game interview
with Jenkins.  I wanted to see him cry and complain that Michigan ran up
the score on them.  Wah, wah....  What an asshole...

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
| Pat Lawson                     :  Go Buckeyes!!!!!!            |
| lauson@en.ecn.purdue.edu       :    Scarlet and Gray Rules!!!! |
------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: FSU-Miami (one more opinion)
Organization: University of Virginia
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 19:46:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct1.173555.24906@meaddata.com> bobj@meaddata.com (Robert Jones) writes:

>
>Does Florida State play anyone tough this year besides Miami? (Not a
>flame, I just want to know.)

Well, first off, they play florida and the rest of the acc

whether you define those as 'tough' is up to you.......:-)
r
From: seale@bcserv.wustl.edu (Seale (Jeff))
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: A&M Game on TV?
Date: 2 Oct 92 22:05:55 GMT
Organization: Washington University in Saint Louis, MO USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcserv.wustl.edu

laura@sdd.hp.com (Laura Mansfield) writes:

>Does anyone know when the A&M game starts and if and where it will be
>on T.V.?

>Thanks,

>Laura Mansfield
>Hewlett-Packard
>San Diego Printer Division
>TAMU '90
It's on Raycom at 12:10 CDT. But you don't want to see the guys
from the school with the ugly campus beat the crap out of the aggies
now, do you?
-Jeff
Go TECH!!!!!
From: hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: GLENN TANNER OUTDOORS
Date: 30 Sep 92 20:02:50 GMT
Organization: Chevron

Michael Noonan (secret lovechild of Lou Holtz and Mia Farrow) writes:
>
>}>>tannerg@u.washington.edu (Glenn "The Outdoors Man" Tanner) writes:
>}>
>}>Southern Methodist University is getting no respect from the pollsters.
>}>I'm not crying for an actual ranking in the 20-25 range (those are reserved
>}>for Eastern teams which pile up good records against poor competition), but
>                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>As if SMU has played a steller schedule so far!
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>}>SMU should at least be one of the OTHERS RECEIVING VOTES.
>}
>}I was wondering the same thing.  SMU is playing some of the best football in
>}the country right now.  After an impressive 3-1 start, you would think that
>}some AP voter somewhere would have found the resolve to squeeze SMU into the
>}number 25 slot on their voter's card.
>
>What???!!!  I can't believe my ears!  I actually thought the first post
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>was some sort of joke, but there are actually people out there who think
>SMU should be ranked?  Beat Baylor, Tech, A&M and Texas, and then we'll
>talk.  You guys have lost to Tulane (a veritable powerhouse, I know) and
>have managed victories against Division 1-AA North Texas, 0-2-1 TCU, and
>New Mexico and you think you should be ranked?
>
>}>>The facts :
>}>1.  SMU is on a 3 game win streak.  Their only blemish was a one-point loss due
>}>    to a missed 35 yard field goal on the final play of the game.
>}
>}
>}A heart-breaking loss to a much improved Tulane team.
>
>Oh brother!
 ^^^^^^^^^^
>
>}>2.  SMU's defense has allowed 13,14,13, and 9 points in their 4 games.
>}
>}The SMU defense must be one of the better defenses in the country the way they
>}are playing right now.  Opponents simply can not get into the end zone on the
>}Mustang defense.
>
>You have a sick sense of humor.
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>-Mike Noonan


(When the sun.......came up this mornin'........I took the time t'watch
it rise.......)

Alright GT. Don't tell me you have a size limit on Frenchmen, too?!?!?

(Today is mine.........Today...is...mine........)
(And remember.....next time you're net.fishin'.....keep wutt you can
use, but throw the rest back....to be caught....anutter day.....)


James (Bill Dance would be my hero if he'd lose the UT cap) Clyde
From: saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: NU-Purdue result/Big Ten
Date: 4 Oct 92 23:31:33 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Madison

In article <1992Oct4.222013.28274@en.ecn.purdue.edu> lauson@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Patrick W Lauson) writes:
>In article <1992Oct4.040612.6731@news.acns.nwu.edu> fish@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Eric West) writes:
>>
>>NORTHWESTERN 28, PURDUE 14!!!
>>(at least that's what I remember the score to be, the Cats won anyway)
>>
>>Even more frighteningly....
>>
>>NORTHWESTERN IS TIED FOR FIRST IN THE BIG TEN!!!!!!
>>AHEAD OF OHIO STATE AND IOWA!!!!!
>>AAAAAAAAAAH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
>
>Wow.  This is the first Northwestern woof I have read in my entire life!!!
>Next thing you know, there's gonna be some Midshipmen woofing it up....
>
>Congrats on the victory, N'Western.  

I wish they would woof a little bit more over this one.
-- 

Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu
From: rjones@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Randolph M. Jones)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: UCLA scoring streak
Date: 5 Oct 92 19:05:32 GMT
Article-I.D.: zip.1992Oct5.190532.6542
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor

In article <79DO03yXa0Oi00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> fierro@uts.amdahl.com (Doug Fierro) writes:
>  UCLA was overrated- Briuns going undefeated- yeah, right.   They were all
>but shut out by Arizona.

The keywords here are "all but"...I believe UCLA holds (and is still working
on) the record for consecutive games without being shutout...anybody know
what the count is so far?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: Who is number 1?
Organization: University of Michigan
	<1992Oct05.164454.23680@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM>
	<1992Oct6.170953.16319@infonode.ingr.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 19:04:47 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.170953.16319@infonode.ingr.com> tjb@emt.b17c.ingr.com (Tony Bowman) writes:

	   Should UT or Bama (unlikely but possible) go undefeated they will be
	   #1.  You can't deny a 13-0 record !!!  If UT can overcome my Tide
	   then they will be the champs.

This falls right in line with the claims that the Miami/FSU winner would
*definately* be #1 this week.  Stating it doesn't make it true.  If Michigan
and Wash go undefeated the rest of the way the Rose Bowl will be between #1
and #3, or #2 if Miami falters.  It would take an act of God for a team to
fault over that.  UT and Bama may be the best teams in the country, I don't
know, but they need some help knocking off the teams ahead of them to win it
all, because of their ranking.

Bill

--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
From: crs@milton.u.washington.edu (Cliff Slaughterbeck)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Bowl alliance a crock!
Date: 2 Oct 92 16:40:06 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Oct2.164006.24708
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

rowdy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (robert.dieckmann) writes:
>> wft@soda.berkeley.edu (William F. Tell) wrote:
>> } what is it about the Pac 10 that is viewed with disdain?  
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Cliff Slauterback?

Better than "Cliffy", Bob, but I've seen much better destructions of my
name.

****************************************************************************
Cliff Slaughterbeck           * 
Dept. of Physics, FM-15       *   Hey Matt!  The diffusion pump is full of
University of Washington      *   water again!
Seattle, WA 98195             *
****************************************************************************
From: lbaum@bcsaic.boeing.com (Larry Baum)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: #1 Washington vs #2 Penn State
Date: 4 Oct 92 21:25:25 GMT
Organization: Boeing Computer Services AI Center, Seattle

In article <92277.103054MJR127@psuvm.psu.edu> MJR127@psuvm.psu.edu (mark rieker) writes:
: 
:          That's right! It time for the 1992 version of the nets' favorite
:             game..... How Penn State will win the MNC!!
: 
:          O.k. can anybody find a problem with this..................
: 
:          -Washington goes undefeated the rest of the year
: 
:          -Penn State goes undefeated the rest of the year
: 
:          -UCLA goes undefeated in the PAC-10 this year

OOPS!

-- 
Larry Baum
Computer Science Organization
Boeing Computer Services     uucp:       uw-beaver!bcsaic!lbaum
(206) 865-3365               internet:   lbaum@atc.boeing.com
From: laura@sdd.hp.com (Laura Mansfield)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Texas Tech vs. Texas A&M
Date: 2 Oct 1992 20:33:01 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, San Diego Division
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdl141.sdd.hp.com

In article <1992Oct1.215657.12812@radian.uucp>, paulmc%radian@natinst.com (Paul Conditt) writes:
|> 
|> Upset prediction/fantasy:
|> 
|> Texas Tech 34
|> Texas A&M  21

   NOT!!

|> On a lighter note, one of the many things Tech has going for it over A&M is
|> that we have FEMALE cheerleaders who are MUCH better-looking than those
|> yell-leaders who look like they were just let out of the state hospital for
|> the game.  We also have a Masked Rider on a beautiful black horse instead
|> of a dog who barks incessantly. :) :)
|> 

   Didn't Sports Illustrated a few years back dub the Texas Tech campus the 
   UGLIEST.

|> And now for the required Aggie joke:  Do you know what they call good-looking
|> girls in College Station?  - Visitors.

   Did you hear about the Texas Tech cheerleader who stayed up 
   all night studying for her urine test?

|> 
|> Austin, TX - the most wonderful place in Texas!

   I would have to agree. :-)

|) OK, enough flame-bait.

   I guess I bit. 


GO AGGIES - BEAT THE HELL OUTTA TEXAS TECH!!

Laura Mansfield
Hewlett-Packard
San Diego Printer Division
TAMU '90
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: paladin@leland.Stanford.EDU (Jason Gische)
Subject: Re: PENN STATE: ARE YOU READY?
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: USA
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 92 06:00:57 GMT

In article <1992Oct3.232826.2271@fcom.cc.utah.edu> jli@bingham.utah.edu (Jianliang Li) writes:
>
>	What we wanted has happened: Miami beats FSU by a score of 19:16.
>It means Miami will move back to #1 spot.  Furthermore, Notre Dame lost
>badly to Stanford.  Texas A&M and Wahsington just barely captured their
>victories.  It is expected that PENN STATE will probably move up to #5 spot
>in the AP polls.
>
>	On October 10, if PENN STATE beats #1 Miami, they will certainly
>move up to #1, #2 or #3 spot. The victory will also lock PENN STATE to the
>Blackbuster Bowl (6 wins needed) with a possibility of facing Washington for
>the national champs.  The only question remaining is:
>
>	PENN STATE: ARE YOU READY FOR THE BIG GAME?
>
>
>	********************
>	JLI   PENN STATE '90
>	********************
>

I don't think Miami would move back into first just because it beat FSU
by three points.  Washington beat USC, who were ranked in the top 25, so
have no reason to drop.  The main reason Miami dropped even while winning
was that their status as #1 over Washington was a dubious call that the
pollsters made at the beginning of the season.  By just barely beating 
Arizona, the pollsters decided they weren't as good as initially thought.

However, Arizona is currently whipping UCLA 23-0.  This may give Miami a 
reprieve in that Arizona is crushing a top 15 team.  Maybe they weren't
so bad after all.  

Personally, I think Penn State is going to be crushed by Miami.  You
don't prepare for the Hurricanes by playing a bunch of patsies.  And
I wouldn't guarantee Washington going undefeated in  the Pac-10 just yet. 
Stanford looked like it's offense is finally hitting high gear while it's
defense proved it could shut down the best offense in the nation.
And Cal has rebounded from it's loss to Purdue quite nicely.  The winner
of the Pac-10 may have a conference loss.

Jason Gische
Go Cardinal
From: mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: wuck fashington!!!
Date: 1 Oct 92 20:49:38 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Ramblin' Wrecks from Georgia Tech

garbe@smith.phys.ucalgary.ca (Greg Garbe) wrote:
}
}I would like to remind all of those Floridians 
}that the Huskies have indeed played a
}Florida team in the recent past.  It was in the 1989 
}Freedom in which UW man handled
}Florida, winning something like 35-7
}So now lets here all of the 
}excuses from you guys on how this game did really show anything.

In 1989 Florida was not a very strong team, certainly not indicative
of the strong FSU and Miami teams of the last decade or even of 
Florida's 1990 and 1991 teams.

The Gators started off the season pretty well, but midway through
the season 3 quarterbacks (including the top 2) were suspended and
the coach (Galen Hall) was fired.  After that Florida dropped 
3 of its last 4 games and finished tied for 4th in the SEC.  
Washington, on the other hand, finished tied for 2nd in the PAC-10.
In fact, Florida was not even supposed to go bowling, but Indiana
was upset by Purdue in the last week of the season.

The margin of victory for Washington was very impressive (34-7) -
the largest margin for a Florida loss that season.

IMNSHO, anyone who suggests that Miami/FSU would have blown
Washington away last year or that Washington would have blown 
FSU/Miami away is a fool.  All 3 were very strong teams
and it's extremely doubtful either side could have dominated 
the other.  (BTW, I would have voted Washington #1, but that 
was practically a coin toss.)

-- 
Mark Mitchell           Georgia Tech            mm42@prism.gatech.edu

    "I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz!"       
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Michigan!@!@#!?! Win the ROSE bowl!@!?!?@
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 13:04:30 GMT

> ash@ulysses.mr.ams.com (Alan Harder) informs us that:
>
>   >I was wondering earlier - 
>   >Colorado goes 11-0, with a Orange Bowl bid,
>   >A&M goes 11-0, with a Cotton Bowl bid,
>   >Washington goes 11-0, with a Rose Bowl bid,
>   >Tennessee goes 11-0, with a Sugar Bowl bid.
>
>   >Does anyone see a lil problem?
>
>Yes, the problem is that Washington, if it goes undefeated entering
>the Rose Bowl, with then lose to undefeated Michigan.
>

BWAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

thanks alan, havent had a good laugh all day. Maybe I should cross-post
this to rec.humor.funny. MICHIGAN?! Win a Rose Bowl? Not only that, but win
a R.B. with MNC implications?

Stop it, you're killing me!@!@!@

r
From: ychen@helena.stat.uga.edu (Yinpu Chen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: SEC Preview (Oct 1 and 3)
Date: 28 Sep 92 22:57:40 GMT
Organization: University of Georgia Statistics Department

In article <69219@hydra.gatech.EDU> mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:
>
>ARKANSAS (1-3) hosts GEORGIA (3-1):  The Dawgs stumbled early in their
>                                     first road trip this season (to
>but could make some headway against their inconsistent D: Georgia 31-14.
>J.J. Clyde's Pick: Georgia 24-16
>Series record: Arkansas leads 2-1
>Last meeting: Georgia won 20-17 (1987 Liberty Bowl)

How about 1991 independence bowl?
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 21:44:58 EDT
From: Kurt Ludwick <KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Best Marching Band -- Blue Band ?

In article <92273.112426JXJ101@psuvm.psu.edu>, John Johnson
<JXJ101@psuvm.psu.edu> says:

>Penn State does have a music major available.

Ironically, music majors generally don't have TIME for marching band. Strange
but true.

>I'm suprised to see that none of the Blue Banders on the net have chimed in
yet.

In the words of our esteemed director (close to the exact words)
"We don't have to talk the talk; we just have to walk the walk."

------------
Kurt Ludwick
------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: ssj@ais.org (Stephen S. Johnston)
Subject: Re: wuck fashington!!!
Organization: UMCC
 <1992Sep30.005606.10267@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 06:56:25 GMT

In article <1992Sep30.005606.10267@mailer.cc.fsu.edu> kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu
 (Kevin Delgado) writes:
>Um, for those people in Michigan (not naming names or anything) who think that
>either Florida, FSU, or Miami have *ahem* small players on defense--think
>again. Lemme give you just a sample of what kind of monsters we have down
>here.
>
>Miami defense: (averages of team starters)
Crap deleted

>Florida State team defense averages:
More crap deleted
 
>I dont currently have U. of Florida's stats with me. 
So? 
>But it is abundantly
>clear that not only are our players fast, but they are big as well. Of
>particular note of FSU's players are Dan Footman (6-6, 280, DE) and Sterling
>Palmer (6-7, 260, OLB). I see these guys on campus here all the time (they are
>very hard to miss) and it never ceases to amaze me how huge these guys are.
"Our guys are fast, they're not fat. Michigan is.  Etc."  Woofing deleted. 

So?  What's the point?  FSU beat Michigan last year.  Again, so?  
Are you feeling insecure because Charlie Ward can't tell the difference
between a receiver and a safety?  I thought this thread was about 
Washington.  Don't they teach geography at FSU? 

>
>The point of all this ranting and raving is this. Florida...southern football
>in general..._IS_ the football of today. We not only have the fastest and most
>talented players on the whole...but we possess the highest level of
>competition around. Granted, Washington does have a good team...with lots of
>size and speed.  But get real, until they get a competitive schedule they just
>cant match up with the big boys here in the south. It is just one of those
>things where you just have to see it to believe it...I look forward to an
>undefeated UCLA season so that Washington can finally get a chance to play a
>real opponent (not from the big fat...er 10) like ND, Miami, FSU...etc. I
>think that would give a definite answer to the question of who plays better
>ball. The south of course.

Wait.  I thought you were too busy attacking Michigan to get back to the 
topic of this thread.  
I guess beating us meant a great deal to you.  
>
>Kevin.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>When asked why I chose to come to FSU, I paused and thoght for a moment. At
>last I spoke, "Well, it ain't Michigan."

You're right.  Thank God Michigan isn't FSU.



==================================================================
Steve Johnston                                Go Blue!
ssj@ais.org                              Webber, Rose & Co. 1993
Steve_Johnston@um.cc.umich.edu          NCAA Nat'l. Champs to be
Bluefront@HeroMud II (Heroine)
==================================================================
From: guest@ulysses.atmos.colostate.edu (Guest)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Sorry, Gophers!
Date: 2 Oct 92 14:41:57 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Atmos. Science, Colorado State Univ.

>sour grapes... couldn't get into CU, eh?
>
>Njan

Sorry Njan, but the almighty Colorado doesn't have an atmospheric science
department, unlike Colorado State. Get your facts straight, it was staring
at you in the reference part of the message.........

J. Knowles                                   Go RAMS!
From: poore@ds13.scri.fsu.edu (David Poore)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami mascot   (was: Re: wuck fashington!!!)
Date: 1 Oct 92 13:02:02 GMT
Reply-To: poore@ds13.scri.fsu.edu (David Poore)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Florida State University

In article <1992Sep30.205843.23056@ods.com> scott@ods.com (Scott Harper) writes:
>Mark Mitchell (mm42@prism.gatech.EDU) wrote:
>: gws6860@tamsun.tamu.edu (Gary Wayne 'Goober' Smith) wrote:
>: }- goober (also, should you have mashed potatoes or dressing with that?) smith
>: And sweet tea.
>And Cheese Sauce!!!  See Brian, its gonna be easier than you thought!

The cheese sauce *is* for the tea, right?

David Poore
poore@da13.scri.fsu.edu
From: ddn@cbnews.cb.att.com (david.d.nason)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Ohio State fans have a lot of excuses
Date: 6 Oct 92 19:16:30 GMT
Article-I.D.: cbnews.1992Oct6.191630.27474
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Oct6.132743.3543@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
>This is not a flame; it is an observation.  So please, nobody take extreme
>umbrage at this.  :^)

Well I'll try, but it's hard not to take offense at a generalization
such as "Ohio State fans have a lot of excuses".

>
>I have seen more excuses/analysis over TOSU's loss to Wisconsin than I've
>seen for about any other game.  Why?  It seems to me the TOSU fans on the
>net are very analytical when it comes to football, and they always have
>some sort of an excuse for bad play.

In my case, I'm not making excuses, I'm offering what I believe to be
possible "reasons" for the bad play.  Perhaps it's a small distinction
between an "excuse" and a "reason", but excuse has a negative implication,
as if the other team had nothing to do with the bad play.
I always try to give credit to the other team where it is due (and it is due
to Wisconsin this week).

As to the "why", it's because the people involved obviously enjoy
talking about it and analyzing it - I really don't think, for the most
part, it has anything to do with "excuses".

>
>How about this:  "Ohio State sucked last week".  Short, concise, and
>accurate...

Can't (and don't want to) argue with that ... 

>Brian E. Saunders			saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu

david
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jeffc@eng.hou.compaq.com (Jeff Carlson)
Subject: Gators leave Scott field with tails tucked!
Organization: /home1/jeffc/.organization
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 14:01:30 GMT

Thank you ESPN! For five years MSU has played Florida in Florida.
Last night the Gators found out what happens when they crawl out of
their swamp and travel to Starkville, MS.  It was, however, a bitter-sweet
victory with Sleepy sustaining a knee injury that will probably leave
him sidelined for the remainder of the season.

Go DAWGS!!!

--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Jeff Carlson  (713) 374-9141    |  "Duct tape is like The Force. It has |
| JeffC@Duke.Eng.Hou.Compaq.COM   |  a light side and a dark side, and it |
| Compaq Computer Corporation     |  holds the universe together."        |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-