HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sanjay@andromeda.rutgers.edu (Sanjay B Shah)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Mouse Behavior under Different Conditions
Date: 7 Oct 92 01:31:57 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.


	I play Eye of the Beholder II on a 386/33 PC clone
under DOS 5.0.  After about half an hour of play the mouse
abruptly dies.  The mouse now no longer works in DOSSHELL
(did not run any other program to test the mouse).  However,
once Windows (3.0) is started it does work - but only within
windows;  once exiting windows the mouse no longer functions.

	Some points to note:

1]	I need to (soft) reboot the computer to regain use of
	the mouse - everything works fine until I start the game.
	Then once again it performs exactly the same behavior
	described in the 1st paragraph.

2]	I thought about what would happen if I ran the game under
	Windows.  I tried this out and obtained the same behavior.
	BUT now, all I needed to do was to quit the game and get
	back to Windows, and then restart the game (instead of
	rebooting the computer).  This enabled me to use the mouse
	for another half hour before it died again.  Oh, and once
	I returned to windows the mouse functioned properly.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

	Does anybody have any idea what might cause this strange
behavior?  I believe I have two mouse drivers(?) - one installed
in the C:\MOUSE directory and the other one under the windows
directory.  I venture to guess that this has something to do with
my problem ....

	Any help to correct this will be appreciated. Thank you!


		Sanjay

	sanjay@andromeda.rutgers.edu

PS: Any additional information needed will be gladly supplied.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu (TOBIN MATTHEW CREEK)
Subject: OPINIONS: Speedstar 24X vs Stealth 
Originator: tmcreek@c00100-100lez.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu (TOBIN MATTHEW CREEK)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 13:23:41 GMT


Thanks to all who replied to my post asking for comments on the 
Conner CP30200.  It is an excellent drive!  Two weeks of pure, fast, quiet
heaven.

Continuing with the 2-year overhaul (only the I/O board and the monitor will
be left), I am upgrading my Paradise 1024i 512K video board.  

Question:

Should I buy the Speedstar 24X or the Stealth.  More specifically:

1.  Both are coprocessed, correct?  Both are fast(er than what I have), right?
    Which one is FASTER (this is a primary concern).
    Which one is faster (if any difference) in plain VGA modes (no drivers)?

2.  I am using OS/2 and have heard that S3 doesn't want to write drivers. 
    Is this still the case, or has 3 million copies changed their mind?  
    I hear that Speedstar 24X drivers are coming after the 32-bit GRE. True? 

3.  Can any Speedstar 24X users comment on the Paradise compatibility?  
    How about the VESA compatibility?

4.  Which mail-order place has the best price?

I would really like to hear from owners of both cards, if I can.  Please
E-mail, but you may want to post as well.

Send replies to:               | My opinions do not represent
     tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu      | anyone who does not feel the
     creek-tm@aza.csc.ncsu.edu | same way as I do.
  Spelling comments directed to: Dan.Quayle@white.house.gov
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: bgoffe@seq.uncwil.edu (Bill Goffe)
Subject: Zeos' Support of P24T: < 100% Due to Cache Differences?
Organization: Univ. of North Carolina @ Wilmington
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 18:56:07 GMT

In the recent thread on Zeos' new machines and their support of
the "586SX" P24T, I was left confused on one point. As I understand
it, the motherboard on the new machines won't support the 
writeback mode of the P24T cache (and I presume a ROM upgrade
wouldn't change this).

Thus, to really support the P24T, wouldn't the cache in the P24T
have to have the ability to be put into writethrough mode? If it
can't, can Zeos really claim support for the P24T?

Am I missing something here?

____________________________________________________________________
|Bill Goffe              |  Will Unicode support new types of       |
|bgoffe@seq.uncwil.edu   |  smilies? If not, why not add 'em since  |
|                        |  email is another form of cummunication. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu (TOBIN MATTHEW CREEK)
Subject: Re: 24X still will not do 800*600 32K at 72Hz
Originator: tmcreek@c00477-224wi.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: tmcreek@eos.ncsu.edu (TOBIN MATTHEW CREEK)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 01:58:29 GMT


In article <1992Oct4.175527.24774@ultb.isc.rit.edu>, ajb8886@ritvax.isc.rit.edu writes:
>In article <BvG86I.JC4@encore.com>, mpalmer@encore.com (Mike Palmer) writes:
>>I received version 2.02 of the 24X drivers yesterday from Daimond in response
>>to my 800*600 32K problem @ 72Hz.  (Missing top 2" of screen - Ok at 60Hz).
>>
>>The new drivers DO NOT fix the problem.  I suppose no one else has this working
>>at 72Hz either?
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Mike palmer
>>Telephone: (305) 797-2326 (W)   (305) 7546-3146 (H)
>>
>One question:  Did you run the 24XMode program to make sure your monitor
>settings are indeed correct for the 72Hz mode?  And are you sure that
>your monitor does indeed support 72Hz refresh in this mode?
>
>Try loading 24Xmode, going to Custom, and playing with the options for
>800*600 mode; see whether any of them work correctly for your monitor
>at 800*600 * 72Hz.
>
>If there is a change of any setting, don't forget to put the line
>24XMODE MONITOR in your autoexec.bat (no it's not a TSR, it just sets
>the chip configuration and exits) so that your card is configured correctly
>for your monitor at all times.
>
>Hope the information is useful.
>
>Alex
>
There is no 800*600*32K @ 72 Hz mode.  The best you can do is 60Hz I think.

The modes are...

Resolution.      Max Color              Horizontal      Vertical
                                        Timing (Khz)    Timing (Hz)
1280x1024           16                  49.0             43.5 I
1280x960            16                  49.0             43.5 I

1024x768            256                 58.1             72.0 NI
1024x768            256                 56.5             70.0 NI
1024x768            256                 48.3             60.0 NI
1024x768            256                 35.5             43.0 I

800x600          32,768                 37.8             60.0 NI
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
800x600          32,768                 35.1             56.0 NI
800x600             256                 48.1             72.0 NI
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
800x600             256                 37.8             60.0 NI
800x600             256                 35.1             56.0 NI

640x480         16.7 Million            31.5             60.0 NI
640x480          32,768                 37.8             72.0 NI
640x480          32,768                 31.5             60.0 NI
640x480             256                 37.8             72.0 NI
640x480             256                 31.5             60.0 NI

(quoted directly from ZEOS faq - thanks Ken!)

I have been reseaching this card as of late and am buying one tomorrow.
From: edmund@swl.spec.ptg.sony.co.jp
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Address of Dragon Systems.
Date: 5 Oct 1992 06:45:15 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Hello World,

	Recently I came across an interesting article from the local newspaper about computer speech-recognition systems. It was first reported by the New York Times. I would like to be in touch with the company mentioned in the article. If anyone out there knows the address or contact numbers, I would greatly appreciate if you could pass it on to me. Below is the profile of the company:

		Dragon Systems, Inc.
		- a leading supplier of computer speech-recognition
		  systems boasting a 20,000-word vocabulary.
		- available on PCs.

	Inclusion of other companies involved in such area of work is also certainly welcomed. Thank you in advance. My details for contact are listed below.

Sincerely,

--
Edmund Teng
Software R & D Laboratory		|	edmund@swl.spec.ptg.sony.co.jp
SONY Precision Engineering Center	|	Tel: (65) 776-5858
Blk 12, The Mendel #03-04		|	Fax: (65) 779-5657
Science Park Drive, Singapore 0511.	|	Sieze the day...
From: bphdarcy@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Sean J. Roc D'Arcy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: HP Deskjet 500
Date: 30 Sep 92 12:33:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <BvCFAG.4nz@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, veselena@eagle (Jim Veselenak) writes...
>Anyone have any comments, suggestions etc. regarding the HP Deskjet 500?  I can't afford a Laserjet and am wondering if the Deskjet will suffice.  My needs
>are word processing and a little DTP.  Any advice will be greatly appreciated.


I would highly suggest one if you are concerned about price.  I have had 
one for over a year now and never had any problems with it at all.  The 
output is very good (better than a few of the cheap laser printers here) 
and the cost to print is much lower per page than any other ink-jet (that I 
am aware of).  Mine seems to work fine with windows and most DOS 
applications.  A bit slow (4 ppm), but I think the price is worth it.

SJRD
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: rjr@infrared.creol.ucf.edu (Mr. Reginald J. Reed)
Subject: Trident BBS Number?
Organization: Infrared Group, Center for Research of Electro-Optics and Lasers
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 14:54:02 GMT

Does anyone have the phone number for Trident or for the Trident BBS system?
I need to get some updated driver software for my 8900c board.  Please
email replies.  Any information will be greatly appreciated and don't worry
about people flooding my mailbox (ie, please don't assume someone else has
answered my question).  Thanks!
--
Reginald Reed
System Manager, Infrared Group
CREOL (Center for Research in Electro-Optics and Lasers)
rjr@infrared.creol.ucf.edu

-- 
--
Reginald Reed
System Manager, Infrared Group
CREOL (Center for Research in Electro-Optics and Lasers)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith)
Subject: Any diff's between Cyrix '387 and IIT '387 ?
Organization: The John P. Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 04:27:58 GMT

I initially wanted a Cyrix 33 mHz, but when my favorite mail-order house
said that they just carried the IIT version, for $85, I bought it.
Did I make a mistake?

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: jim@ferkel.ucsb.edu (Jim Lick)
Subject: 2nd serial port connector pin assignments?
Organization: University of California, Santa Barbara
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 06:54:08 GMT

Hi folks,

I have an old serial card I bought years back when people still thought of
Compaq as a cheap clone company and Dell was known as PCs Limited.  Anyways,
I'd now like to use the 2nd port on it.  I have no idea where the manual
is now, so I don't know anything about the pin assignments on it.  I have
already put a 16550 in the UART socket, and the 1488 and 1489 line drivers
in their sockets, which are conveniently labeled.  The port number and IRQ
dip switches are also labeled, so I have no problems there.  All that's left
is figuring how to wire a cable between the 2nd port connector and a
standard DB-25M.

The board sports a sticker saying 'GCH' which may be the manufacturer.  The
connector is a row of 10 pins arranged vertically.  I am going under the
assumption that the topmost pin is pin 1.  I have purchased a 20 pin IDC
connector with ribbon cable, and using every other pin.  Pins 1 and 9 are
connected to ground.  I have attempted to trace some of the other pins back
through the line drivers to the UART, but I've gotten hopelessly lost with
this tactic.

Does this description ring a bell with anyone?  I was hoping that this would
be something simple like a direct pin for pin map between the AT DB-9
assignments, and not using pin 10.  However, this theory plain doesn't match
up with pins 1 and 9 being ground.  Does this description ring a bell with
anyone?  My next plan is to just hook things up and diddle bits until I
learn the pupose of each line, but it would save a lot of trouble if someone
already knows what the assignments are.  The signals I need are RD, TD, RTS,
CTS, DCD and DTR.  I've alredy found ground (whee!).

Please email answers and I will summarize responses.

                            Jim Lick		       
Work: University of California	| Play: 1236 Camino Meleno
      Santa Barbara		|       Santa Barbara, CA 93111-1007
      Dept. of Mechanical Engr. |	(805) 964-2088 voice/msg
      2311 Engr II Building     |	(805) MUD-SPY1 data
      (805) 893-4113            |       jim@tcp.com
      jim@ferkel.ucsb.edu	| This space intentionally left blank
From: st1r8@rosie.uh.edu (Guillot, Burt J.)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Is this a problem with the HD controller?
Date: 4 Oct 92 14:44:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: rosie.4OCT199209440359
Organization: University of Houston
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

Yes, it's me again.  The guy with all the old computers and hard drive
troubles, <grin>.  I was running an XT controller in an AT machine using
a MFM'ed Seagate 251-1 drive.  Anyway, I was told by several people that
the XT card shouldn't have even worked in an AT machine and that was the
reason why the drive was accessing so slow.  Well, I bought a used
16-bit AT MFM card and have been trying to get it to work properly.  I
disabled the on-board floppy controller with a jumper, and now all
drives are hooked to the new controller.  (I was using a 360K drive, but
now have installed a 1.2 meg that I had gotten).  Anyway, the drive is
just acting very weird.  I can't even do simple copies from floppies
(with the 360K or the 1.2M).  The COPY command does its job, but when I
try to unzip the ARJ or ZIP file, half the files have CRC errors.  If I
take the same disk and put it in my other computer, the unzip and unarj
process works just great.  (I never get any data errors, or general
failure errors).

Even the files that get passed the CRC check, if copied to another place
on the disk then get struck by the problem.  (They won't execute
properly, will come up with random garbage characters when run).  I took
all boards out of the computer except the CGA card and the controller
card.  (The modem/fax, memory, and network cards are no longer in it).
I've re-low leveled, and fdisked, and high-leveled the thing about ten
times already.

I've ran SPINRITE and Norton Disk Doctor and they both report there are
no errors whatsoever (except for the three errors I punched in when I
low-leveled the drive, that info from the drive sticker).

The drive worked fine before, but I guess it is the controller thats
faulty.  Could the card be too fast for my system??  I'm only running on
an 8mhz 286.

Also ... a side note ... the drive light stays on constantly, but I've
been informed that older MFM cards used the drive light as a "power
indicator" rather than an "in use" indicator and I have to attach an LED
to the little led pins on the controller.

Also, when I've low-leveled the drive, I had to use special SETUP
programs to do it.  I don't know what the DEBUG address for the
low-level formatting program on the controller is (if ATs even use
them?).  C800:5 worked on the XT card, but I've heard it may have
something to do with F000-something on an AT.

Any help would be appreicated.
From: weiss@staff.tc.umn.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Bernoulli--Hard Drives International
Date: 2 Oct 92 03:53:46 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota

Does anyone have experience with the Bernoulli offered by Hard Drives
International? They supply 2 90 MB cartridges along with the drive and
Stacker 2.0 all for $500.

The DTR and access is better than my RLL and there doesn't seem to be
any other inexpensive add-on storage solution.

Any negatives on Bernoulli's in general?
Thanks,

__jeffrey weiss
From: damouth@wrc.xerox.com (David E. Damouth)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: GHost S3 Local Bus video board problem
Date: 30 Sep 92 15:43:43 GMT
Reply-To: damouth@wrc.xerox.com
Organization: Xerox Webster Research Center

Has anyone sucessfully used Borland Turbo Debugger for Windows with the
GHost S3 local bus video board?  In any of the SVGA modes, my system
crashes when TDW tries to change between text and graphics modes.  In
VGA mode it works fine.  The SVGA modes seem to work fine with Windows
in all other situations.  This board passes the VESA-compliance test
software provided by Borland.  I've played with all the setup options
and alternalte .dll files provided by Borland.  A call to Borland tech
support didn't help ("try a different driver").


---
/Dave
David E. Damouth
Xerox Webster Research Center
damouth@wrc.xerox.com
voice: 716-422-3186
fax: 716-265-7133
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.intel
From: starr-daniel@CS.YALE.EDU (Daniel Starr)
Subject: Re: Shortage of 486 processors
Organization: Yale University Computer Science Dept., New Haven, CT 06520-2158
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1992 06:17:11 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.160152.23136@uklirb.informatik.uni-kl.de> kirchner@uklira.informatik.uni-kl.de (Reinhard Kirchner) writes:
>Hello,
>as I, and perhaps others, had to learn, 486ers are rising in their price,
>and are in short supply. I could today ask a men from Intel and he told me:
>
>People switch very fast to the 486, away from the 386, much faster than
>Intel had thought. This change is faster than any former, to the 286, or
>the 386. So Intel did not plan to rise the capacity so fast. They do it
>now, but it will take months, 2, 3 or even more, until supply hits demand.
>
>So: buy fast or wait until next year. ( free advice from me -:) )
>
>Reinhard Kirchner
>Univ. of Kaiserslautern, Germany
>kirchner@informatik.uni-kl.de
>


-- 
--------------------
Daniel Starr
dstarr@minerva.cis.yale.edu
"Wait! Wait! Maybe THIS will work!"
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: markt@rocky.gte.com (Mark Tsombakos)
Subject: Dead/dying Seagate drive-help!
Organization: GTE/SCSD - Needham Heights, MA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 12:56:54 GMT


A friend of mine recently gave me a Seagate 7120 130M drive.  He told me he was
having problems with it, and had to have it replaced.  Me, being the
dedicated engieer and packrat, gladly took it from him.

The problem with the drive seems to be that it fails to spin-up - sometimes.
A friend told him it was a known problem with Seagate's drives of this type,
and that the head(s) actually "stick" to the platter occasionally.  He
confirmed his theory by demonstrating his moethod from getting the drive
running again:  hold it in his hand and jerking it in a circular fashion.
(as I looked on in horror)  Sure enough, we plugged it in, and it was fine.

Now, I'm never going to put anything critical on the drive, figuring it may
give out for good at any time. Has anyone else had a similar experience with
this type of drive?  Would it be cost-effective to have it "repaired"?  Is
it repairable??  Or should I just enjoy the extra 130M while it's around?

Thanks, 
Mark

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: anikzad@symbol.com (Arman Nikzad)
Subject: Gecco Computers
Organization: Symbol Technologies, Inc.
Distribution: all
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 17:28:47 GMT

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: jim@ferkel.ucsb.edu (Jim Lick)
Subject: Re: are EISA & local bus mutually exclusive?
Organization: University of California, Santa Barbara
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1992 07:39:02 GMT

In <19quskINN69o@agate.berkeley.edu> aron@archangel.ced.berkeley.edu (aron bonar) writes:
>I saw the advertisements in the Bay Area (California) Microtimes.
>The ones I saw had either one or two local bus slots and the
>rest were EISA slots.

The ad I saw in MicroTimes #99 allowed the 2 local bus slots to also
function as EISA or ISA bus if not used for local bus.  The issue is
at work, so I can't give any more details than that.  There was no mention
on if the local bus slots were proprietary or VESA.

                            Jim Lick		       
Work: University of California	| Play: 1236 Camino Meleno
      Santa Barbara		|       Santa Barbara, CA 93111-1007
      Dept. of Mechanical Engr. |	(805) 964-2088 voice/msg
      2311 Engr II Building     |	(805) MUD-SPY1 data
      (805) 893-4113            |       jim@tcp.com
      jim@ferkel.ucsb.edu	| This space intentionally left blank
From: au240@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Ari Pitkanen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: WD1003-WAH and WD1003-WA2
Date: 5 Oct 1992 18:19:36 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: au240@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Ari Pitkanen)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Hello!

I like to have some information about WD1003-WAH and WD1003-WA2 harddisc
controllers.  Are they for MFM or RLL drives?  Is there some kind of
database about hd controllers?

Email me if you can help me.

Thanks.

-- 
Ari Pitkanen : au240@cleveland.freenet.edu
From: dab6@po.CWRU.Edu (Douglas A. Bell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: 3-chips SIMMS ARE 32 bit! READ this for enlightenment
Date: 27 Sep 1992 03:32:26 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: dab6@po.CWRU.Edu (Douglas A. Bell)
NNTP-Posting-Host: thor.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, sasrer@unx.sas.com (Rodney Radford) says:

>sms@cs.utexas.edu (Stephen Mark Sanderson) writes:
>
>>OK, here's the deal: your machine will only work *correctly* with 3-chip
>>SIMMS IF it has the capacity to use 4-meg SIMMS.  This is because the 3-chip
>>1 meggers use 2 4-megabit chips and a parity chip to provide a meg of 
>>memory, while 9-chip 1 meg SIMMS use 8 1-megabit chips and a parity chip.
>>The problem lies in your machine's ability to use 4-meg chips!  And, BTW, the
>>3-chip SIMMS are 32-bit!  
>

The computer I am using right now cannot take 4 meg simms but is happily 
using 3 chip 1x9 simms under os/2 2.0.

But the comment about 3 chip simms being 32 bit is not just wrong,
it doesn't make sence in this context.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: bolek@viewlogic.com (Boleslaw Ciesielski)
Subject: Chipsets: OPTI or SIS ? Which would you prefer ?
Organization: Viewlogic Systems, Inc., Marlboro, MA
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 21:43:23 GMT


Hi,

I am buying a computer for my father and the dealer has a choice of
motherboards with either OPTI or SIS chipsets. Does anybody have
good or bad experience with either of them ? If so, I would like to
hear! This is for ISA 486 DX-50.

Thanks!

     Bolek
bolek@viewlogic.com
From: cmb6@po.CWRU.Edu (Christopher M. Baranowski)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: another modem prob.
Date: 28 Sep 92 16:41:06 GMT
Reply-To: cmb6@po.CWRU.Edu (Christopher M. Baranowski)
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc12.ins.cwru.edu


ok, here it is. I have a Zoom 14.4k modem (internal) and I have it set up
on any comm port 1-4 (the ones that I can use with my bbs program.) Now the
problem is that 1. It will answer the phone but it won't start the bbs
software. 2. After the modem has been initialized I can't use my floppy
drives I get a Stack overflow error. I have tried using the different comm
ports 1-4 and I get the same error. I called ZOOM and their tech support
guy told me to change the comm ports again. I have 3 other jumpers on this
modem that the book says nothing about and tech support says that I don't
want to touch them. Does anybody have or know of anyone who does have this
kind of modem? Tech support SUCKS at ZOOM. I know you people can help me
out here. Send all replies to cmb6@po.cwru.edu



thanks..

-- 
The Unwanted BBS (216) 289-6883  Monday thru Saturday 24 Hours
The Max Speed 300/1200/2400/9600/ 14.4k bauds Supported
Tradewars Tournament Going on now! Sign up soon.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware