From: jsw@cray.com (Jon S. Wood)
Subject: Re: inequity in child support (was Re: I HAD NO
Reply-To: jsw@cray.com
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 14 Dec 92 13:42:28 CST

In article 1ge2k7INNlr1@gap.caltech.edu, peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
>noraa@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (aaron.l.hoffmeyer) writes:
>
>>Child support amounts are set based on the noncustodial
>>parents income or ability to make a set amount. 
>
>You clearly know a great deal about the inequities of the 
>child support system. What is your interpretation of how
>these inequities arose in our historically male-dominated
>court system?  
>
>
>-- 
>
>                                                --  Michal
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Of course there's no reason!  


  The historically male-dominated court system has only RECENTLY interpreted
family law changes....

  The federal government, heavily dominated by OLDER people have enacted
laws that are draconian in measure against whom they would NEVER be subject
to. These men sold their soles to the feminista by enacting draconian 
child support guidelines, affirmative action and countless other 
'fairness' laws knowing they would never have to live with them.
 

 Congress does not have to abide by the laws they pass.

 Older men don't have children to pay for, they already left the roost.
Consequently, younger men are obligated to suffer pay MORE. It gives
congressmen/ettes an excuse to say they care about kids.

 Senators are financially capable to survive on what remains of their
mythical obligation. Senators are generally MILLIONAIRES.

 Most congresspersons voted FOR the bill not knowing ANY OF THE FACTS in the BILL.
See MY COUNTRY"S typical expenditure bill.

 TYPICAL: Bush vetoes Democrat bill filled with enough pork and bullshit
social giveaway problems to put us into debt for years (ok all you democraps,
do ya hear that the Clintdumb Economic Summit claim that our spending
problems are primarily in Medicaid and MediCare?) and the democrats claim
Bush is heartless and doesn't care about granny! 

 Congressman and Congressettes also give themselves a raise by hiding it
in a bill that funds Womyn's Shelters and Nursing Homes, and then vote on the
S.O.B. Bill  about 4 minutes passed 3 a.m. That way, most taxpayers who
would shoot the bastards for doing this are still sleeping off of a
hangover, having spent the night before drinking their financial sorrows
away........

Lets see. a vote to restore loan guarentees to your country has a 3.4 million
dollar expenditure to build a freeway by-pass in  XX County USA. This 
road money is called a 'rider' to a bill.

Men pay child support. Reduce welfare/afdc costs etc....

 Congress (FILLED WITH DO-GOODERS) has a philosophy to make life fair.
WHat they end up doing is screwing everybody. 

No-fault divorce has destroyed children's lives.
Congress, lobbied strongly by the Hillary Clinton's of the world would
have you believe it is men.

 Congressette Jerry Sikorski claimed "Powerful Men's groups" defeated 
him in his re-election bid. Jerry Sikorski was nothing more than a 
pussy whipped doop whose check bouncing practice and anti-father
draconian child support advocacy stance were in direct conflict with each  
other. He wanted to jail men for something he claimed his wife did every
month; BOUNCE CHECKS!!


Child support and congress will change. Just takes time.