From: "micky wong" <micky.wong@canrem.com>
Subject: cfmn?
Reply-To: "micky wong" <micky.wong@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: soc
Date: 23 Nov 92 00:46:58 EST

In article: <1992Nov20.024111.20981@marlin.jcu.edu.au>
   Subject: CFMN?
      From: phsj@marlin.jcu.edu.au (Su Jianfeng) writes:

SJ> As I can not determine that you have been hurt or not, you can not dete
SJ> directly that ordinary Chinese people in China have been hurtting by CM
SJ> not.  Thus, I make a suggestion here that if there are someones to
SJ> formally push the CMFN bill, we use whatever way, which is convenient
SJ> (newspapers, letters to university students in China), to tell the name
SJ> and behavours of those persons to people in China and suggest the
SJ> people who are interested in, to make a judgement on that whether
SJ> who are interested in, to make a judgement on that whether those CMFN
SJ> promoters are political prostitutes or democratic fighters.   The
SJ> answers are suggested to be sent to the USA embassy or any newsgroups
SJ> they want.  Thus, if they are considered to be democratic fighters, the
SJ> will be well known in China.  But if they are considered to be politica
SJ> prostitutes, they will be kicked away both in China and USA.

You need to be a little bit careful in using your name of "political
prostitutes", if we follow your line of thinking, then you could easily
define the whole Chinese nation had been forced into became "political
prostitutes" by Mao in the cultural revolution. This would be utterly
unfair to the Chinese people, this also tells us that it is wrong to do
name callings on the net.

We do know that CCP's hardliners are formidable foes who have more money
than any oversea Chinese individuals to buy hired voices, shall we call
these noise makers also as "---- prostitues"?  The end result would be
very unproductive. :-)

To your suggestion, I think it could be an excellent idea. Of course a
single question survey would be unfair to any party involved. so I
suggest, in addtion to your question, we shall add the following
questions:

Give you a choice of UMFN or the chance of living in a free country,
which one would you choose?

Give you a choice of UMFN or a U.S. Green card, what will be your
choice?

Give you a choice of UMFN or a Chinese Passport with an exit visa, which
one would you like to pick?

Give you a choice of UMFN or the release of your loved ones, who are
jailed just because they voiced their view opposing the CCP's, which one
will you choose?

Give you a choice of UMFN or the just punishment for those corrupt CCP
cadres, what will be your choice?

Give you a choice of UMFN or the punishment of the 6.4 massacre
butchers, which will be your choice?

Give you a choice of UMFN or the freedom of press, freedom of speech,
which will be your choice?

Give you a choice of UMFN or the disapearance of that party secretary in
your unit, which one will you choose?

Give you a choice of UMFN or the free from the worry of high inflation,
which will be your choice?

My question to you is: Will the CCP do anything to concur Chinese
people's will from the survey result?  :-)
---
 MegaMail 2.1 #0:
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china