HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: karnik@femto.cs.umn.edu (Neeran M. Karnik)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: The WEEK Gallup Results
Date: 13 Nov 92 00:04:39 GMT
Article-I.D.: femto.karnik.721613079
Organization: University of Minnesota

In <1992Nov12.155932.29535@ousrvr.oulu.fi> jma@phoenix.oulu.fi (Jacob Matthan) writes:


>THE WEEK MODE OPINION POLL

	Extremely interesting statistics, these!

>Captaincy

>Cricket Lovers
---------------
>Kapil 60 %
>Azha 34%
>Shastri 3%

	Hey, whaddya know! A good 338 cricket lovers agree with me about 
Shastri :-) Azhar does seem to suffer from a poor perception among the 
public, especially compared to the opinion of the cognoscenti below....

>Cricketers
-----------
>Kapil 35%
>Azha 47%
>Shastri 15%

	Wonder why so few of the cricketers have confidence in Kapil. Perhaps
the question was - who should be captain for this tour to SA/Zim ?


>Openers

>Cricketers
-----------
>Jadeja 68%
>Shastri 65%
>Siddhu 63%
>Srikanth 51%
>Raman 44%

	So, the cricketers realize the worth of Shastri as opener, unlike the
general public. And look who's first and who's last :-) Does that provide 
any clues as to who's going to open tomorrow ?

>The Batting Nucleus

>Cricket Lovers
---------------
>Tendulkar 97%
>Azha 89%
>Manjrekar 88%

>Cricketers
-----------
>Tendulkar 99%
>Manjrekar 93%
>Azha 92%

	No arguments over the top three, as is to be expected........

>The Bowling Spearhead

>Cricket Lovers
---------------
>Kapil 98%
>Prabhkar 97%
>Srinath 70%
>Chetan 42%
>Banerji 42%

>Cricketers
-----------
>Kapil 100%
>Prabhakar 99%
>Srinath 91%
>Chetan 30%
>Banerji 19%

	Heartening to see that Srinath is pretty highly rated by those
presumably in the know. Now if only he could grab some wickets...


>The Spinners

>Cricket Lovers
---------------
>Maninder 61%
>Raju 58%
>Shastri 25%
>Ayub 12%

>Cricketers
-----------
>Maninder 74%
>Raju 72%
>Ayub 17%
>Shastri 9%

	Why oh why isn't Maninder in the team? :-) Obviously, Kumble wasn't
even mentioned in the opinion poll, else he would surely have scored 
better than Ayub and Shastri.

>The Keepers

>Cricket Lovers
>More 97%
>Pandit 71%
>Yadav 13%

	Heh heh, this poll must have been conducted in Bombay :-)

>Cricketers
>More 96%
>Pandit 42%
>Yadav 38%


>Enjoy

Sure did...

>J. Matthan


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  Neeran   Karnik  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dept. of Computer Science,      | Email: karnik@cs.umn.edu
University of Minnesota         |        karn0001@student.tc.umn.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: SA v Ind T1 D1 post lunch
Date: 13 Nov 1992 06:01:39 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

SA are 96 for 1 with Wessels at 62 and Kirsten at 13. This score is at 11:25
GMT.

Earlier Cook was out for 0 and Hudson for 14.


Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: mamohamm@vela.acs.oakland.edu (SKEPTICAL)
Subject: Re: Waqar
Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 13:39:31 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.231304.2386@walter.bellcore.com> shamim@bellcore.com writes:
>In article 25984@vela.acs.oakland.edu,  mamohamm@vela.acs.oakland.edu (SKEPTICAL) writes:
>>	Does anybody out there know for how long has Waqar Younus
>>	has played for Surrey?
>>	I think he just finished his second season with the county,
>>	but I am not so sure.
>
>Correct. he played half a season in '90 (I think Surrey had Sylvester Clarke (?) who left in 
>mid-season) and all of '91. 
>
	To follow-up on my own question, I read in the London 
	Times that Surrey has been found guilty for three 
	straight now of ball tampering. Means that ball
	tampering is going on at Surrey before Waqar joined 
	the county side.

regards

-- 
____________________________________________________________________
Men Want To Be Girl's First Love,
			         Women Want To Be Men's Last Romance
					    <somebody else's saying>
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.NOdak.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores
Subject: testing gateway
Followup-To: rec.sport.cricket
Date: 10 Nov 1992 14:48:04 +1100
Organization: Mail/News gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: munnari.oz.au

   Please ignore. This is a test to see if the gateway works.

Rao
From: rakesh@sungear.mame.mu.OZ.AU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores
Subject: Aust Prime Minister's XI beats Windies
Followup-To: rec.sport.cricket
Date: 13 Nov 1992 08:09:27 +1100
Organization: Mail/News gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: munnari.oz.au

As title says  Australian Prime Minister's XI beat West Indies in a one
day match at Canberra.

Aus PM XI 233/? (50 overs) (Dean Jones 76 and Mike Bevan had good score)

WI 229/? (50 overs) (Reiffel and O'donnel bowled well)

Detailed scorecard, I will post it later

at one stage WIndies were 173/4 in 44 overs - finally needed 9 runs of
Reiffel's last over but could manage 5 runs and lost two wickets.

rakesh
Xref: sparky rec.sport.cricket.scores:246 rec.sport.cricket:16349
From: fkhan@daisy.ee.und.ac.ZA (Feroz Khan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores,rec.sport.cricket
Subject: SA Side for  1st test
Followup-To: rec.sport.cricket
Date: 10 Nov 1992 01:11:13 +1100
Organization: Mail/News gateway

Hi there


Just announced was the SA side to take on India on Friday in the 1st test
at Kingsmeasd. The side is:

Hudson, Cood, Wessels, Kirsten, Rhodes, McMillan, Richardson, Henry,
Pringle, Donald, Schultz, 12th man : Cronje.

On stand by is Steven Jack for Alan Donald who is injured. If Donald does
not recover for the test, then Jack will take his place.

Interesting that Henry has been included, most probably expecting the
wicket to show some turn on the first two days. Snell has not done enough
to maintain his place after dismal performances in England and at home and
Schultz making a late charge.

Latest scores.

India vs President's XI - Raining
Tvl vs WP - Raining
Natal vs Border - Natal won by 7 wickets.
OFS vs EP - OFS trying to hold onto a draw.


----------
Feroz Khan
Third Year Electrical Engineering
University of Natal
Durban
South Africa

Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: IN%"cricket@vm1.nodak.edu"
Approved-By:  KSRAO@POWER.EE.NDSU.NODAK.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores
Date:         Sun, 8 Nov 1992 12:09:00 -0600
Reply-To:     KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
From:         KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Subject:      Cricket on 7 Nov 1992
Comments: To: cricket@vm1.nodak.edu

   Updated   17:45 GMT on 7 Nov 1992

Zim v NZ ODI

       Today, New Zealand played its second ODI with Zimbabwe. It is historical
since this is the first time that a test match was interrupted to play a
one-day game.

      Zim. won the toss and scored 271 for 6 in 50 overs. The Flower btothers
put on 124 for the first wicket and Houghton scored 50 in 42 balls. Decker also
had a half-century ( he made 55).

      New Zealand made 272 for 6 with 19 balls to spare. Greatbatch and Latham
had a 98 run opening partnership. Greatbatch scored 55 and Latham 40. Crowe
scored 94 off 87 balls and Rutherford scored 37 runs.

WI v WA Day 3

     Western Australia declared their innings 239 for 7 (41 runs behind) for
forcing a result in the game. West Indians have made 239 for 7 in four and half
hours. Haynes had 66 and Lara 46. Aurthurton with 50 and Hoper with 42 are in
an unbeaten partnership of 88 for the fourth wicket.

India v President's XI Day 3

     Indian need 305 runs for a victory on the last day. President's XI were
cheaply dismissed today with the last 7 wickets falling for 63. runs. Srinath
took 4 for 49 and Shastry 3 for 7. India are 9 for no loss at the stumps (I do
not know whether the need 305 in the second innings or 305 more runs)
From: KSRAO@power.ee.ndsu.NOdak.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores
Subject: WA/WI D1 scorecard
Followup-To: rec.sport.cricket
Date: 8 Nov 1992 14:08:09 +1100
Organization: Mail/News gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: munnari.oz.au

From: rakesh@mame.mu.OZ.AU (Rakesh DESAI)

At WACA, Perth
West Indies
D Haynes	c Moody b Julian		52
P Simmons	c Veletta b Julian		15
B Lara		C Moody b Angel			55
C Hooper	c Moody b Angel 		 5
K Arthurton	c Zoehrer b Angel		 7
G Logie		b Angel				49
J Adams		c Zoehrer b Julian		52
D Williams	lbw b Julian			19
C Ambrose	c Zoehrer b Julian		 0
K Benjamin	not out				13
P Patterson	b Angel				 6
Sundries (1 lb, 6 nb)				 7
Total					       280

FOW 40,117,131,132,139,214,248,248,269,280

Bowling
B Reid		18-4-62-0
T Alderman	18-3-52-0
B Julian	20-3-72-5
J Angel		20.4-6-59-5
W Andrews	10-0-34-0

K. Sankara Rao                          e-mail ksrao@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu

Department of Electrical Engineering
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105  USA

Phone:  (701)237-7217  (o)
        (701)235-9912  (h)
From: srao@plains.NODak.EDU (sankara rao)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket.scores
Subject: (none)
Followup-To: rec.sport.cricket
Date: 10 Nov 1992 17:19:19 +1100
Organization: Mail/News gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: munnari.oz.au

testing gateway again

Rao
From: pieter@ford.ee.up.ac.za
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Teams for the India vs SA Presidents XI, Pretoria
Date: 5 Nov 1992 23:42:03 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


India vs Presidents XI, Centurion Park

India: (from)
Azharuddin, Shastri, Raman, Jadeja, Tendulkar, Amre, Prabhakar, More,
Sharma, Srinkath, Banerjee, Raju. 

Presidents XI:
Hansie Cronje (c, OFS), Rudolf Steyn (OFS), Terence Lazard (WP), Louis
Koen (EP), Mike Rindel (NTvl), Errorl Stewart (Natal), Kenneth Mahuwa (Tvl),
Dave Rundle (WP), Brett Schultz (EP), Tertius Bosch (NTvl), Rowan Lyle
(Natal). 12th Pieter Barnard (NTvl)

Play starts 10:30 today and it is nice and sunny in Pretoria after
days of rain. Chances are that this game will be interrupted late in
the afternoon on most days.  India have included three openers of
which probably only two will be chosen for the test next week; i.e.
this can be seen as trial match for Shastri, Raman and Jadeja. The
same applies for the seam bowlers.  In the Presidents XI, all eyes
will be on Stewart as a possible solution to the wicket-keeper-that-
can-almost-bat-and-almost-keep problem as well as on Bosch. Bosch has
not performed well in the first part of the local season, but that may
be due to his final exams that he just finished (his dental degree).
Other interesting players are Rindle and Koen, both explosive bats,
but lackingh consistancy. This is essentially a junior team (all < 24
I think)

Off to Centurion Park now....
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: jmm080@sarah.albany.edu (Malde Jayen M)
Subject: Re: Ramakant Achrekar
Organization: State University of New York at Albany
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 21:36:04 GMT

In article <1992Nov11.171816.23120@ousrvr.oulu.fi> jma@phoenix.oulu.fi (Jacob Matthan) writes:
>
>The latest issue of THE WEEK has a fascinating article "KINGMAKER OF CRICKRET" about Ramakant Achrekar, the coach who was responsible for amongst others, the development of Sachin Tendulkar. "Sachin always tende sd to overdo things. If he scored 200 during the day, he would still turn out at the post-match nets. Even when he bowled, he would bowl 50 overs in a day."
>Sachin and friends organised a benefit match for Ramakant and collected Rs.400000.
>Fascinating statement about Vinod Kambli. "Vinod Kambli bothers too much about the material things in life. Wearing cut-off jeans and swaggering around with a Walkman does not make a great player (or rather a great player)."
>THWE WEEK ran an intereting gallup before the recent SA tour. If anoyone is interested I can summarise for the net.

Please do...

>Regards
>Matthan
>Oulu, Finlan

Jayen.

Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Subject: Hold your breath - SA?India on PPV???
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 22:20:16 GMT
Reply-To: ksrao@power.ee.ndsu.nodak.edu
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

     Toay I got the information that Time Warner are going to (or planning to)
show India/ SA games on PPV.  If I get any further information on this regard,
I will post them forthwith.

      Regarding the matches today _ in India's innings the highest scorer was
Extras  35 (or 36). The hightst scorer with bat was Chetan Sharma in the tenth
wicket partnership of 25 and odd with Srinath. I do not think that Indian team
has any chance of retrieving the position they are in, in this tour. Let us
hope that the umpires in SA will make mistakes (or show bias) so that there is
plenty of excuse for this level of performance. 

      In the Zim/NZtest, Marti Crew dominated the day. He scored 144, his
hundred came in 122 deliveries with 14 fours and three sixes. He scored four
more fours and a six in his innings. His partnership with Ken Rutherford was
worth 168 (of which he scored 144).

      In Perth, WA scored 188 for 6 on the day where play was interrupted a lot
due to rain. There were less that 75 overs. Hooper was the main destroyer with
four wickets. Marsh. Moody and Damien Martin fell for low scores.


K. Sankara Rao                          e-mail ksrao@power.eee.ndsu.nodak.edu

Department of Electrical Engineering
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105  USA

Phone:  (701)237-7217  (o)
        (701)235-9912  (h)
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Umpiring and Indian Captains
Date: 11 Nov 92 15:16:48 GMT
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services
NNTP-Posting-Host: vmsa.csd.mu.edu

Hi there
While browsing through a copy of Times of India
I came across an article mentioning the selection 
of umpires for the upcoming season. According to 
the sytem in vogue captains give (both captains)
points on a scale of 0-1 (worst to best) based 
on a umpires performance in a match. The points 
given in the domestic matches will be accumulated
to decide on who would officiate. It seems that 
Venkat got a good score and hence he is in the panel.
On the other hand Umpire Jamula got absolute zero
from Azhar after his officiating in I believe Irani
Cup and hence he was dropped. I think this may be a 
way of getting feedback but maybe some umpires
willl be wary of rising their finger when the captaoin
is batting:-).
In this regard it should be mentioned that the man
who gave Mani out in the Tied Test has never umpired
again(Vikramn Raju)

       *********************************
       *	N.Ramasubramanian      *    	    
       *********************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: ahmed@ee.tamu.edu (Jubayer Ahmed)
Subject: Re: Please don't pick on Dr. Rao
Organization: Texas A&M University
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 08:55:47 GMT


I second Nalin's motion. There are not many people on the net who are a   
constant source of information like Dr. KSR. I have been following his 
postings for a long long time. I have a shell command made by Dr. Rao's 
name so that whenever I login it shows me the current status of any ongoing 
game. If you dont understand by the context of the posting what it means 
even if there is some kind of typing error or something, then I doubt if 
you deserve to read rsc. If you don't like his posting, just skip it. Please 
don't flame him. If we just disregard the time which is required to gather 
so much information about a game, just the typing itself consumes appreciable 
amout of time, which is very difficult to afford. A gentleman is showing 
some generosity by doing so and we should be grateful to him for his constant 
feedback. Instead we are picking him for some typo or misspell. Hey, come 
on guys, we are not paying him for this job and therefore, we should'nt 
faulter him for typo or misspell. So please, refrain from flaming a person 
(any person, not only Dr. Rao) if that person is providing us enormous 
amount of information by wasting his own time and effort. A big occasion is 
coming and we need Dr. Rao's postings. So:

PLEASE, DON'T KILL ONE OF OUR BIG SOURCES OF INFORMATION ON R.S.C. 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: rrao@pima.intel.com (Ravi Rao)
Subject: Re: Zim v NZ T2 D2 close of play
Organization: Intel Corporation
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 23:17:37 GMT

this is a test,

rr

--
-----------------------------------------------------
Ravi S. Rao
SP1-82	Intel Corpn, Chandler, AZ
e-mail: rrao@hopi.intel.com, rrao@pima.intel.com

Customary Disclaimers apply.
-----------------------------------------------------

Organization: Freshman, IM - H&SS Track, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Date: Thu,  5 Nov 1992 10:26:22 -0500 
From: Sujan Azad Parikh <sp48+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Vinod Kambli 

   I think that instead of selecting Waman Raman for the SA tour, the
selectors should have selected Kambli. Raman has already had his
chances. Fresh, new blood must be injected if the middle order is to
bear any resemblence of solidity. Remember, our batting order ends with
Azza. Kapil has shown that he can still pack a few big hits (World cup
'92) but even he is aging. 
   Let me tell you a few things about Kambli. Our school played against
their school (Shardashram) in the inter school cricket championships in
Bombay. Even Tendulkar was there in the team at that time. He came in at
number three and Kambli at four. Their school scored 800/2 against our
team. Kambli got a triple hundred that day. He really hammered our
attack. Seeing Raman stand (he is the most lethargic player I have ever
seen) makes me think, does the Indian team deserve this? Remember,
Kambli can also fill up the role of the opener.

Sujan Parikh      
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
From: peterg@hplabsz.hpl.hp.com (Peter George)
Subject: Re: oiling or Seasoning?
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 18:25:39 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Hewlett-Packard IC Business Division R&D, Palo Alto, CA


<Re: To oil or not to oil before seasoning a cricket bat>
---------------------------------------------------------

I'll relate my experience with a Slazenger V* (6 or 12): The
bat was designated as a non-oil one and had a very thin
polyurethane coating. I gradually broke the bat in with an
old cricket ball, then took it to the nets for a few weeks
and then finally played with a new ball in a game. The bat
held up pretty well for a season. The next season it started
developing superficial cracks. So I stripped the poly- and
oiled it with raw linseed oil (available from most hardware
stores). In CA, this stuff is of a slightly thicker grade
than the oil available by mail-order from England. The bat
survived well for half the season and then failed
catastrophically: cracked straight down the middle of the
blade. I attributed this to the dessication of the willow
in the fairly dry CA climate. I went through the same motions
with yet another non-oil bat.

I've given up on non-oil bats, based on my experience and
those of other cricketers. I've switched to unseasoned, raw
Gray-Nicolls Dynadrives. I basically oil them with the thicker
CA raw linseed oil for a month or so and then gradually break
them in. I've had good service from two of the three bats that
I've put through this process, with the only failures being
premature cracking observed on the bat oiled with the lighter-
grade English linseed oil and eventual retirement due to handle
failure.

Now, if I could only find some more time to play ....


cheers,


peterg/-


-- 
+-.."money for nothing,   ||--------------peterg@dtc.hp.com
|                      ---||-----M/S 26U-2, 3500 Deer Creek
+-...chips for free."..   ||------------Palo Alto, CA 94304
From: ratan@thebe.rutgers.edu (Santosh Ratan)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: IND vs PRES XI
Date: 8 Nov 92 22:53:58 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

In article <1djl5tINNfuq@gap.caltech.edu>, sagrawal@cco.caltech.edu (Sanjay Kumar Agrawal) writes:
> Chasing 305 to win, India were 9 for no loss at the end of the
> penultimate day. Earlier, the Presidnt's XI lost their last
> 7 wickets for 70 odd runs. Srinath took 4 and Shastri 3 wickets.

At the end of the second day, India were behind by about 170 runs.
That means PXI scored about 135 runs and India scored 9 runs. Is 
that it? or, was there some time devoted to the rain or something?
If there was no interruption then it is pathetic for Indians to have 
palyed or let other team play so slow.

Also, can someone be kind enough to post the scorecard please.

Santosh
-- 

***********************************************************************
                       Santosh Ratan  
                   ratan@jove.rutgers.edu
      Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
         Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
                      Piscataway, NJ       
***********************************************************************
From: pieter@ford.ee.up.ac.za
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: SA 215/7, end of the first day
Date: 13 Nov 1992 09:10:37 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Henry caught Tendulkar (slip) 3, b Shastri of the 2nd ball of the last
over.  The day started and ended with a wicket.  Azhar's decision to
field payed off as the wheels came off towards the end of the day. On
the replay it looks as although Rhodes was caught off his pads without
the bat bit, and Carl Liebenbergh could have been bullied into that
decision.

The wicket is starting to turn, so who knows what is going to happen
in the next few days. Jack Bannister goes as far as saying that the SA
score is not neccesarily that low. 

Well, day one went to India in a big way!

The WI ump Steve Bucknor is handing out signatures at the end of the day!

Kapil 32/2 Prabhakar 46/0 Kumble 46/2 Srinath 69/1 Shastri 17/2
From: ckhan@bbn.com (Chico Kahn (Room # 20/317 B))
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: WI-WA and Shield matches
Date: 10 Nov 1992 15:18:41 GMT
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
Reply-To: ckhan@BBN.COM (Chico Kahn (Room # 20/317 B))
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

In article <1992Nov10.004227.10022@vax.oxford.ac.uk> mcbean@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
>In article <rakesh.721123111@sungear>, rakesh@mame.mu.OZ.AU (Rakesh DESAI) writes:
>> At WACA, Perth
>> West Indies
>> Total					       280
>> 
>> FOW 40,117,131,132,139,214,248,248,269,280
>         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>The usual middle order gymnastics -:)  Who is this guy Angel?  The papers in
>the UK just listed him as a protege of Alderman.

Just don't blame my guy Hooper, he's there as a bowler, remember? :-)

>McBean

Chico.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hasmatallie A. Khan          |      |                  InterNet: ckhan@bbn.com
Bolt, Beranek and Newman     |___.  |___.  .___.     SneakerNet: 20/317 B
150 CambridgePark Drive      |   |  |   |  |   |       AT&T Net: 617-873-6119
Cambridge, MA 02140          |___!  |___!  |   |     CompuServe: 72770,1507
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket