HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL:  TAN:  A nasty response to Sunni, Ann and .sigless E
Date: 10 Apr 92 15:15:41 GMT
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Apr9.191810.21575@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> lisad@dynamo.ecn.purdue.edu (Lisa Dominique) writes:
>
>Sheesh, I was just beginning to unlurk, but if there are 
>people this RUDE in this newsgroup who practice this type
>of attitude continuously, 

No, it's just me.  The rest of the people are very *nice*, which
is why I got so pissed off to begin with.

>I'm going back to alt.romance.chat
>where at least folks are kind to each other.... (I hang out
>there anyway.... too....)   No, I take that back, I will NOT
>leave this newsgroup, 

OK, welcome back.

>but I would like to say that judgement
>calls on others is really not necessary, is it??  Isn't this
>a free world and everyone is entitled to their own opinion?

Exactly why I responded the way I did.  It seems some would like the
regular people to not voice their "own opinion" because either there
are too many of us that agree, or because we say things too strongly.

>As Jesus once said, "Let he who has no sin cast the first stone."

Don't even get me started on this.  I'll sit on my hands now.

>I rest my case.    
>
>Lisa D.


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |
|  It's going to fall if it's there for long.   :   tm@mhnmc.att.com       |
|  It's over, it's over me.             R.E.M.  :                          |
From: illya@pyrtor.UUCP (Illya Barnett)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AW: Weird relationship
Summary: Aunt Liz
Date: 16 Apr 92 17:27:38 GMT
Reply-To: illya@pyrtor.UUCP (Illya Barnett)
Distribution: na
Organization: Pyramid Technology Canada, Toronto, Ontario

In article <Apr.14.11.20.36.1992.2790@gandalf.rutgers.edu> shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Susan Hagan) writes:

>When Rachael's son Jamie was born, everyone thought he was Russ Matthew's
>son because Russ and Rachael were married. (Russ is Olivia's father).
>Jamie was named after Russ' father James.  James sister-in-law (his
>brother's wife) is Liz Matthews.  Therefore, Liz was sort of a great-aunt
>to Jamie.  
>
>It turned out that Jamie's real father was Steve Frame.
>
>Russ, Liz's nephew, then went on to marry Sharlene Frame, who is Jamie's
>real aunt.  So I suppose Jamie is related to Liz in a way.
>
>Although Liz never had a nice thing to say about Rachael, so I don't know
>why they are friends.
>

I was just so shocked that Liz was able to keep Olivia's secret
quiet.  I have always felt that Liz had the biggest mouth -- gossip
central for Bay City.  This time I wanted her to tell everyone
though.  I'm glad we finally know who the baby's father is.

>
>-- 
>Susan R. Hagan (shagan@gandalf.rutgers.edu) 



-- 
Illya Barnett                   |"With the gravity so many claim of their
illya@pyrtor.UUCP               |existence, it's a wonder these nine planets
..pyramid!pyrtor!illya          |don't get confused and collide.."-BTC
From: 20676DOC@MSU.EDU ("Darren.Meahl")
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: AMC An-Li
Date: 8 Apr 92 17:45:00 GMT

<finger on what disturbed me about An Li's being called a "bitch", but
<I think you've summed it up nicely.
<--
<Pat Martin Steward                          patstew@oz.plymouth.edu

But don't you think it was just a _little_ bit bitchy of her to screw
with the guy she knew her "best friend" was in love with?  Even if An-Li
_had_ married him, she knew that Brian wasn't in love with An-Li, but
still loved Haley.  Granted, Haley treated An-Li like shit after she
married Brian, but wouldn't YOU?  I sure would!  I'd have made Brian
the world's quickest widower!!!!

Darren Meahl
20676doc@msu.edu
From: roxy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (r.prisco)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT4.14.92
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:27:07 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <9204151524.AA15608@ivy.Princeton.EDU>, ski@IVY.PRINCETON.EDU ("Karen Williams") writes:
> 
> YUCKdale, April 14
> 
> HIYA, KIDS .........  HIYA ........
> 
> 
> Rita:  are you sending copies of all our comments to the writers at
>        ATWT?  Another question for you, weren't you at one time a Wendt?
>        While I was sedated did you become another name?
> 
Adelle and I were going to send a copy of the yearbook, but I've been in the
writing room ("I WILL NOT PLAY WITH RODKNEE's KNEES WHEN NURSIE'S TELLING
BEDTIME STORIES" 1,000 times) and have only been allowed out to play
occasionally ... We did give S'Iva a prototype copy of the Yearbook 
at the softball game last year with a ton of updates ... tho we never heard 
what happened to that ...
Adelle has been on sabbatical from the ward for some time, but I saw some
scribbling of hers to the Y&R ward so maybe we can get her back here!
And yes, I changed my name back to my family name, about 5 years aftermy own
personal DI-VORCE .... Seemed silly to keep using someone else's name when I
had a perfectly fine one of my own .... 
WHAT A HASSLE tho .... if anyone else on the ward ever gets DI-VORCED make
SURE that your legal divorce decree gives you PERMISSION to change your name
back RIGHT THERE ON THE DOCUMENT! (what a neanderthal society this can be ...)

And BTW  W*E*L*C*O*M*E H*O*M*E B*a*B*y*D*o*L*l !!!!!  We missed you on the
ward!

>        Also, do you know when the ATWT softball game will be this year?
> 

I don't know when it is but I or Adelle will probably find out and let the
ward know ... we can have a ward trip!


________________________________________________________________________
           _     __ 
          (_)   |  |
 ___  __  ____ _|  |_  ____     _   Tell me when can a woman find any 
 |  |/  \ |  | |_  _| |_   \   (_)  kind of peace
 |  | \_/ |  |  |  |  / /|  |       When does the fury and the agony
 |  |     |  |  |  | |  \|  |   _   cease
 |__|     |__|  |__|  \___^_|  (_)  How long have I got to say please...
         att!mtfme!rita                             Melissa Etheridge   
________________________________________________________________________
Xref: sparky rec.arts.tv.soaps:14477 rec.arts.tv:9559
Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
Date: Monday, 13 Apr 1992 16:13:47 EDT
From: Sandra Webb <SASSGK@vm.sas.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: HF
Distribution: usa
 <1992Apr13.172748.21845@cs.tulane.edu>

In article <1992Apr13.172748.21845@cs.tulane.edu>, coimay@sn01.sncc.lsu.edu (
LAURA CARRIERE) says:
>
>In article <2105@cypress.UUCP>, jql@cypress.com (Julie Lewis--Applications)
>writes...
>>Al goes and talks to all the kids.  (Anne has told the kids that Al will
>>be talking to them.)  Linda is nice to him.  Jeff tells him he doesn't
>>like him, or what he's done to his mother, but he doesn't want to upset
>>his mom. (I was surprised that Jeff was as nasty as he was.)  Hank just
>>walks away with out saying anything.  Poor Al.
>
>before their wedding.  (Though didn't they sleep together once earlier on?
>Perhaps on Hank and Sara's wedding day?  I didn't see that episode, so I'm
>guessing here.)

Yes, you guessed correctly.

I'm not sure that Linda was really nice to him; I'd call it civil.  She smiled
and thanked him for preparing his speech, but didn't welcome him into the
family or anything like that.  Whenever the union negotiations were going on,
she quite pointedly told him she didn't blame her mother for not wanting to
marry him (this was when Al and Ann were off-again) because he had purposefully
withheld the fact that there was no money in the strike fund to pay the
workers.  I think that he lost much of her respect at that point and hasn't
really done much to gain it back.

Sandra
From: greenlaw@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Leila Thomas)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: SB: Troy (was Re: SB: Supernatural experience
Date: 10 Apr 92 10:49:43 GMT
Reply-To: greenlaw@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Leila Thomas)
Organization: David Taylor Research Center, Annapolis, MD

In rec.arts.tv.soaps, marks@skat.usc.edu (Louise Marks) writes:
>tea@cis.ksu.edu (Troy E. Anderson) writes:

Lots of very interesting stuff deleted.
>
>  course, SB is fighting for its life in the ratings.  It may be that
>  the very things that we diehard fans love about the show make it less
>  commercial than other soaps. All we can hope is that SB survives, and
>  doesn't become unrecognizable in the process.

I think you hit the nail on the head.  The things that have kept me
a watcher of SB for about 5 years is that it is different than other
soap.  I think that SB has a good chance of surviving if it becomes
more like other soaps, but then maybe the diehard fans would quit watching
it because it is unrecognizable.

>Bad Mistakes:
>
>Kelly!!!

Yes

>CC & Santana

I like CC and Santana (I know throw tomatoes at me)

>Vilifying Cassie and then dumping her

Really bad mistake.  After seeing her and Warren together (for which
I was in tears), I think they should be getting rid of Angela and pair
Warren with Cassie (I know wishful thinking and impossible).

>Trivializing Mason and Julia (I read somewhere that they were going to
>        become the "stable" couple of SB.  Julia & Mason stable? HAH!)

Yes, I posted that in one of my SOD articles.

>Dumping Louise Sorrell (Augusta)
>Dumping Timothy Gibbs (Dash)
>
>Good Moves:
>
>Lily

She does not impress me one way or the other.  As a matter of fact,
the whole thing about bringing in a younger audience gives me the chills
(I am over 40).

>Rafe the smarmy sweet talker

You mean shifty eyes?

>Jody & Reese

I haven't warmed up to Jodie yet.  I think that Reese and Kelly would
be a good match.  Anything but Cruz and Kelly (turns me stomach).

>Keeping Warren & Angela together

See above remarks

>David gets a personality

Yes.  I can see him with Gina.

>Gina gets a storyline
>Hope for the future:
>
>Jody will get Cruz away from Kelly

Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>Suzanne will get a love interest worthy of her (the guy who walked in

I tend to agree with you, but please NOT ted.

Stuff deleted.
>
>BTW, Craig fans.  John Callahan has just been hired by AMC.
>

Maybe I'll start watching AMC.
>--

Leila
*******************************************************************
"Beauty and the Beast, well thought of by people who think." ---
Roy Dotrice
********************************************************************
From: kaschenb@fraser.sfu.ca (Kevin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Y&R:SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN USED PHRASE
Date: 13 Apr 92 21:39:13 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada


Hey, did anyone else think that what the lab-tech 
guy said as he walked into the lab on Monday's show
was hilarious...and corny?  He said something like:
"Hello, Dr.Granger, I'm from the labtech company and
I've come to take blood from you and your family"
I nearly fell off my chair when I heard it...it just
struck me as being a really weird thing to say.  Did 
anyone else think this, or am I letting my exam
stress get to me again?
Kevin
(kaschenb@sfu.ca)
From: sally@eris.berkeley.edu (S. A. Wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL: A sad, most sad, lamentable story...
Date: 6 Apr 92 23:12:33 GMT
Article-I.D.: agate.rqlt1INN6da
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: eris.berkeley.edu


The following is so sad, tears are flowing upon my keyboard--and I am
not the emotional type. So I advice you who are prove to crying easily
not to read the following--sniff...snort [I hate when I get that on my
screen]


You have been warned. READ AT YOUR OWN RISK!!!!




I just read the following in my local newspaper.

It seems that a tradgic accident has befallen Crystal Chappel.
While she and Michael Sabatino were filming a "romantic" scene--a
romantic dinner by candel light--the flame flickered and snigged
both of her eye brows. This incident is most horrifying since it
is her eye brows, and her ability to manipulate them which makes her
the superb actress she is, and the immense assist to Days.
And thus, the actress will have to take even more time out, and will
have to extend her vacation indefinitely.  For, as with Samson and his
tresses, with the lose of her eyebrows so goes her power.  Al Rabin
has gone into seclusion, and is most distraught. He is at a loss as to
what to do now, since the actress and character are the WHOLE
SHOW--in the words of Rabin.  Rabin was quoted as saying he does not
know what to do now. "I guess this means that for the time being we
will be forced to use the other acters and the writers will have to
develop storylines for them. But heaven knows, they are no where near
the calibre of Ms Chappel....the show is destined to suffer because
of this." [Al Rabin]



Spud--My dad is Stefano, my mom, Emma Peel, and Dave, of course
my uncle--


-- 
A Book of Verses underneath the Bough,   ||  Sally A. Wilson
A Jug of Wine, A Loaf of Bread--& Thou   ||  Potato "Salad" Peel
  Beside me singing in the Wilderness--  ||  sally@mica.berkeley.edu
Oh, Wilderness were Paradise enow! (The Rubaiyrat of Omar Khayyam)
From: sally@eris.berkeley.edu (S. A. Wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL -- Romulus.
Date: 9 Apr 1992 05:45:41 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: eris.berkeley.edu




I love the theories on Romulus. But I have one question: Why can't John
BE Romulus. I mean, that would be a great twist. First we are tempted
that he might be, then we get clues that he can't be, but that Dani is.
What if this is all red herrings. See, Dani admitted to Gabi that not
all--we don't know how much--of what she has told John is true. Now,
I believe they had a relationship, and I believe they were married,
but what if she is lying about the part that HE NOT Romulus--He IS
Romulus. All the theorizing about minor characters being Remus has
been great. But I think that Remus has to be a present, established
character. So for me the twins have to be John, aka Forrest Ranger,
and Lizard. Now Newirth is going to be an evil character, but I
peg him as a "Red Shirt," the guy will be toast, say sometime in
May. Also, I said this enviromental thing is going to come back
into the foreground, and GENCON is resurfacing, Lizard talked about
started up a plant near town. Now as Unyon Breath reminded me,
that it was during the whole GENCON planned forest fire thing that
Steverino die/disappeared so this might me that maybe the character
could return, and be tied into this. If this happens Jack will
then be tied back into the major storyline through his discovery
of Steve's existence.  Everyone will be tied up into the story,
John, Liz, Viv, Bo/Carly, Jack/Jenn, Kay, etc.  

Spud--get thee to a  nunnery--enSalata

-- 
A Book of Verses underneath the Bough,   ||  Sally A. Wilson
A Jug of Wine, A Loaf of Bread--& Thou   ||  Potato "Salad" Peel
  Beside me singing in the Wilderness--  ||  sally@mica.berkeley.edu
Oh, Wilderness were Paradise enow! (The Rubaiyrat of Omar Khayyam)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: tcarsten@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Teresa C D Carstensen)
Subject: Re: HF: Homefront
Keywords: Address
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 11:56:44 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.184419.20743@sparky.imd.sterling.com> teresak@IMD.Sterling.COM (Teresa Kabourek) writes:
>Hi!  Could someone please repost the address to write to in order
>to keep Homefront on the air?  This is one of the best shows around!

Here it is:

Robert Iger
ABC
2040 Avenue of the Stars
Los Angeles, CA 90067

>
>                                    Thanks!!!
>
>
>-- 
>Teresa Kabourek	             UUCP:     uunet!sparky!teresak
>Sterling Software IMD        INTERNET: teresak@IMD.Sterling.COM
>1404 Ft. Crook Rd. South     Phone:    (402) 291-8300 
>Bellevue, NE. 68005-2969     FAX:      (402) 291-4362
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>All the world's a stage and most of us are desperately unrehearsed.

TC Carstensen
-- 
tcarsten@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
From: hero@vax2.concordia.ca (Sylvie M Heroux)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC married names
Date: 12 Apr 92 03:05:00 GMT
Organization: Concordia University
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <9204101843.AA20505@mammoth.Berkeley.EDU>, 20676DOC@MSU.EDU ("Darren.Meahl") writes...
>> ---------------------------
>>
>> To change names or not to change names........ that is the question.
>> I have been thinking about your comments..... I don't know why woman
>> starting changing their names in the first place.  Probably some
>> "sexist property issue" from the way back times when woman didn't
>> have anything except a man to give them a life. (No flames, cuz you all
>> know what I mean)
> 


In the province of Quebec, an article of the Civil Code states that
married women keep their name at marriage.  This was passed as a law
in 1978.  At that time, women who were already married were given the
choice to keep using their husband's name, or to go back to their
maiden name.  For income tax or state health insurance purposes,
only maiden names are used in any case (even for my grand-mother,
who was married twice, I had trouble finding her in a hospital
once because I didn't think of asking about her by using her
maiden name).

For children's names, it gets complicated.  They can be given the
father's last name, the mother's last name, or a combination of
the two, as long as there are no more than two parts (as in
Smith-Roberts, for example).  I'm not too sure what happens in
the case were one or both parents already have hyphenated names.
Maybe they can just pick the parts they want and recombine as they
wish.  Most people still use father's last name, as far as I know.


Sylvie Marie Heroux
Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
We had a snow storm on April 11, yuck, yuck, yuck.
Soon moving to North Carolina where they haven't had snow in 2 years.
From: v070n53b@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (MARK PRZYBYSZEWSKI)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: FAN SURVEY
Date: 14 Apr 92 19:07:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <12APR199214493516@summa.tamu.edu>, dls7515@summa.tamu.edu (SMITH, DARRON L) writes...
> 
>Here are your choices for your FAVORITES:
> 
> 
>FAVORITE MALE CHARACTER:
> 
>Adam Chandler
> 
>FAVORITE FEMALE CHARACTER:
> 
>Erica Kane
> 
TOUGH CHOICE (for me, that is)

> 
>FAVORITE COUPLE:
> 
>Erica Kane and Adam Chandler

With Erica and Dimitri a close second 
> 
>FAVORITE COMIC PERFORMANCE BY a FEMALE:

>Janet Greene

Close second by Erica 
> 
>FAVORITE COMIC PERFORMANCE BY a MALE:
> 
>Adam Chandler

Remember Monday's "That woman was no lady, that was my wife"?  I laughed 
SOOOO HARD!!!!
> 
>PRETTIEST FEMALE:
> 
>Gloria Marsh

Again, close second from Erica 
> 
>MOST HANDSOME MALE:
> 
>Dimitri Marick

I'm probably one of the few who think his goatee looks good on him, but no one
else has facial hair (that's why I have a mustache; I think it makes me look
better than being bald-faced.  And I REALLY HATE those Sensor commercials that
imply that no man with a mustache shaves - oops, going off on a TAN there).

Although seeing John Callahan yesterday comes a close second.
> 
>FAVORITE VILLIAN (The man you love to hate):
> 
>Adam Chandler

But while Will was alive, he was excellently detestable.
> 
>FAVORITE VILLAINESS (The woman you love to hate):
> 
I don't hate any one of them, but I do think An-Li has excellent potential for
becoming a world class bitch.
> 
>FAVORITE STORYLINE:
> 
>*Who Killed Will Cortlandt?

A decent murder mystery has been needed for a long time, and so far so good.

>THANKS AGAIN!!!!!!
>Darron "Tha Barron" Smith
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Mark Przybyszewski 	v070n53b@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu	v070n53b@ubvms.bitnet +
+ 				GO BILLS IN '92!			      +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ I may not be the president, I may not be the pope, but as long as I have    +
+ Gritty Kitty, I shall never mope!	Stimpson J. Cat, Ren and Stimpy	      +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: wolfson@amtfocus.amt.gss.mot.com (Steve Wolfson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: The Suspect List and Addendum R.A.T.S. List
Date: 14 Apr 92 17:23:10 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Motorola, Inc. GSS-AMT, Arlington Heights, Il


How about Will,  we could have Will so warped he committed suicide
just to get back at everyone else. Just a thought..

How about one of the RATS readers, can't be to sure that PC didn't at least
have a UUCP connection :-)
From: lf01+@andrew.cmu.edu (Liz Fox)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL -- Monday (4/13)
Date: 14 Apr 92 13:57:23 GMT
Organization: Office of the Dean - CFA, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

On 13-Apr-92 in DOOL -- Monday (4/13)        
user Kathy Stapleton@gmuvax2. writes:
>     Even though I have really hated this whole thing with Carleee and
>Bo, I must say those scenes with her telling Bo about (we all know
>what but I don't want to mention it for those who haven't watched
>Monday's show yet) were believable.  It didn't bring a tear to my eye
>-- not like how Drake acted when Marlena came back from the "dead" on
>the pier...now, THAT was some tear-jerking acting!  (Tim, you didn't
>think those tears were fake, do you? :)

Grapefruit I have to admit - I too thought that the Bo-Carlee scenees were
good yesterday. I think it had a lot to do with the fact that they
didn't try to hype this with all the flashbacks.  They just had the two
of them sit down together and talk. No fainting, no amaryllis, no nuns,
no statues.  And...ok get ready.....I thought Crystall did a fine job in
telling Bo.  She wasn't overly dramatic and I thought she did a
believeable job.  And like Kathy, no it wasn't a tear-jerker like
Roman(John) and Marlena's reunion scene (I flooded the living room) but
I was captivated.

And the rest of it...oh god...John and Dani LOOKED SO GOOD IN
BED!!!!!!!!  I almost cried when he said she was Romulus (not that she
is but this whole sex thing is over and that's why I'm crying).

And Scarry and Larry...Bleah!

later

BananaPeelaRama
From: jordan@zooid.guild.org (Daniel Baker)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: DOOL: Who cares about Nick?
Date: 15 Apr 92 11:47:25 GMT

From: CXL119@psuvm.psu.edu (Christopher Luckenbill)
>Why does everone think that Nick was so great?
>He annoyed me everytime he was on.
>He was a greasy slimeball.
>He was really disgusting with Eve.
>He had no morals.
>
>No E-hate-mail please.
>
>Chris.

Un-lurking
Well, I wold have to disagree with you totaly.  I thought Nick was a
great character.  The only reason that he was portrayed as a "greasy
slimeball" with "no morals" was because they were going to kill him
off.  They had to give as many people as possible a reason for
wanting Nick dead.  

Before they killed him off :-( he was a cool guy and I liked him.

Catch ya'

Jordan