From: phsj@MARLIN.JCU.EDU.AU (su jianfeng)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Winner, Bush or Clinton?
Date: 21 Aug 92 00:22:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: marlin.9208210022.AA28194


In article <Bt8LJF.MI@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, xlli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (xiao-lin li) writes:
>|> In article <1992Aug19.033115.19230@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> cqu@ringer.cs.utsa.edu (Chang-ning Qu) writes:
>|> >
>|> >        As ROP national conference opening at Houston, the competition
>|> >war for new presidency between Bush and Clinton is getting fiercer.
>|> >Economy is hottest topic in the States. But the rest of world may concern
>|> >more what change of US foreign policy than the recovery of US regression. 
>|> 
>|> I think I like Clinton much better than Bush. This feeling was initiated
>|> in 1989 when Chinese government killed hundreds, perhaps thousands of
>|> people in Beijing. My feeling is that the Democratic Party has a heart 
>|> of people (not only American people, but people in general),
Mr. Clinton has given a blank cheque to Americans.  He is not the 
president and he doesn't need to worry about any possible bad effect of
his behavours to economy of USA.  If he win the election, he will forget
what he has said before the election.  I doubt he will start a trade war
with China for political reasons, if he becomes the president. 

>|> while the
>|> Republican represents the privileged (not only those in American, but
>|> those in general). ......
I think Bush is a good president for Americans, but not for the whole
world.  It is quite normal in a capitalism country the governement pay
more attention to richer people, because they are the most active factor
to the economy. 

>|> No matter how rich and capitalistic China will be, no matter how
>|> glorious China has been in Olympics, the blood and death of the Tiananmen
>|> Square Massacre will never be forgotten.
>|> 
>|> Xiao Li
Do you mean that to support Clinton means to remember the massacre? 
There are only a few persons in Chinese government and CCP who are
responsible to the Tiananmen Square Massacre.
 
>Historically, GOP is a pragmatic party on forigen issues. Those big Corperations
>have donated tons of money into GOP compaign. When their damn interests are 
>threatened by the contry like Iraq, you bet see Bush starts to talk about 
>justice or human rights and other sorts of craps. But there is no doult that big
>oil companies urged him to commite US troops into the combat.  Considering 
>the amount of investment in China and huge market share, Bush has to listen to 
>those special interet groups headed by Henry Kisinger.
It only prove that Bush works for Americans.  Those big oil companies
and the companies which have huge amount of investment in China employ
many Ammericans and they have significant influences on the economy.  If
the American economy declines (for whatever reasons), Bush will have no
chance to win the next election.

>GOP overall consists of a bounch of super-richs and hard-core religious group
>so called conservatives like biased Pat Buchanan. They are quite out of touch 
>with ordinary peoples (income less than six digits). One of the most powerful 
>group in GOP is AMA (American Medical Association) who has been trying damn hard
>to oppose the health care reform to maintain their superior income level. 

>Under the GOP, there is no hope to see the US policy towards China will spur the
>democracy in China. 
I hope the US policy towards China is similar to that of Japan.  Americans
should go to do business with China, if they believe it is good to their
economy.  I don't like the US policy interferes China internal affair, although 
I don't mind Americans only make comments on human rights, democracy
situation and etc in China. 

>I wish this time the democratic party can kick Bush's ass out of the White House
>, they are having a pretty good chance this round.  
Good luck, Bush.


J Su