HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Todd Henderson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: AGGIES SUCK!!!
Keywords: ghoti hunting
Date: 18 Nov 92 15:54:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: news.Bxx5IM.IFn
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana

kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado) writes:

>In article <Bxx283.GKG@news.cso.uiuc.edu> tamu@uxh.cso.uiuc.edu (Todd Henderson) writes:
>>kdelgado@loligo.cc.fsu.edu (Kevin Delgado) writes:
>>
>>>I recently found this definition of the word Aggie in Webster's dictionary:
>>
>>>Aggie - n. 1. an asshole whose size is so extraordinary that the Eiffel tower
>>>       fits inside with only moderate lubrication. 2. a large conglomeration
>>>       of hicks into what has been called a "school". adj. 3 the USUALLY 
>>>       undesirable condition of a part of the body, especially genitalia.
>>>       usage: Your penis is Aggie.
>>
>>And someone asked me why I 'used' to like fsu?  Thank you Kevin for making
>>my point.
>>
>>Todd
>>
>>p.s. Have you contacted Webster to get the new definition in his book???
>>
>>>Kevin
>>
>>

>CLIFF!!! LEE!!! SOMEBODY!!! GET THE NET, I GOT ME A BIG ONE!!!

I don't think so, why do you think I put in the reference to Webster.

Try again.

Todd

>:)

:):):):)

>Kevin
Organization: Sophomore, Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:57:31 -0500 
From: William Karamo Motley <wm1o+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: AP make FSU #3
	<92321.094712JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu>

In an article <92321.094712JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu> JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu writes:

>Sorry, but Miss.  State was ranked 16 before the game, and is now ranked 18,
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yeah, so what's your point??????  What does 16th in the nation mean? 
Not much to me.

>I believe.  Check the facts before you flame next time.
> 
>And before you tell anyone else how FSU has trounced everyone except Miami,
>I suggest you review the Georgia Tech game.

Did I say every FSU game??????  No, I said the last TWO games.  Can you read?

I guess I'll have to put up with this type of ignorance until BAMA
loses, which they will, and it will happen before the Sugar Bowl.  Even
if it doesn't, Miami will show how OVERRATED the BAMA program is.

Don't get mad because your school didn't do shit this year.

Will


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com (David Head)
Subject: Re: FSU - ND - Miami etc.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 13:22:59 GMT
Reply-To: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne  FL

djryan@al.cs.wm.edu (David J. Ryan) writes:

>Seems to me that ND is 0-1 against FSU (game played in South Bend).
>:-)


You know David, I think you're right!!  Good of you to mention it.  The King
of the Road struck again!

D. Head
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: scott@ods.com (Scott Harper)
Subject: Re: Possible #1 vs. #2 matchup in major bowl games.
Organization: Optical Data Systems, Inc.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 15:26:24 GMT

Alireza Vali (reza@magellan.ae.utexas.edu) wrote:
: Scenario 4: MNC decided in the Fiesta Bowl.
: 
: #1 Miami (11-0) vs. #2 Florida State (10-1)
: 
: This one will be possible if, again, Alabama loses, and Michigan is
: tripped up by Ohio State.  A loss or poor showing by A&M will let FSU
: jump over them to #2.  I would **LOVE** to see this rematch, and I'm
: sure it will be an incredible game.

Well, this all of a sudden is a very real possibility... 2 of the 3 'ifs'
cited above have happened...  (UM tied by Illinois, FSU jumps A&M)

My question is: 

Why in the world would Miami play FSU again?  They already beat them.
Now I know this will bring out cries of "chicken" from the FSU crowd,
but really, what does Miami have to gain from a rematch?  How could
they be accused of ducking FSU?  They already played them, AND WON...

So, if they didn't play a rematch, what would happen? (Assuming Alabama
loses)

ps. - I am DEFINITELY not a Miami fan...
-- 
Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081
From: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com (David Head)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Miami's NYD Opponent
Date: 19 Nov 92 12:58:24 GMT
Reply-To: dhead@comanche.ess.harris.com
Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne  FL


Hey fellow Noles!!  I saw it in the Enquirer the other day.  There is only
one football team in city of Miami ... the Miami Dolphins!  The Hurricane
football team is really the Dolphin team suited up in Hurricane uniforms!
They play as the Hurricanes on Saturdays and as the Dolphins on Sundays!
Gino Toretta is just a pseudonym for Dan Marino!  Wow!!  We only lost to
the Miami Dolphins by 3 points in Miami!  Bring on the Buffalo Bills!
From: tshannon@ccad.uiowa.edu (Timothy J Shannon)
Subject: Re: Holiday Bowl (Re: HAWKEYE BOWL CHANCES)
Organization: CAD-Research, U. of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 21:55:46 GMT

From article <17644@borg.cs.unc.edu>, by morse@cs.unc.edu (Bryan Morse):
> In article <1992Nov16.150509@IASTATE.EDU>, rwturner@IASTATE.EDU (Richard W Turner) writes:
> |> If Iowa beats Minnesota this weekend and
> |> Michigan state loses to Illinois, both very
> |> real possibilities, then Iowa will be (6-6) and
> |> will receive a bid to play in the Holiday Bowl.
>    ^^^
>    may
> 
> As has already been repeated over and over here, the Holiday Bowl has
> an escape clause that allows them to decline to invite the Big-10
> third-place team if they have fewer than eight wins.  (My guess is
> that they want to any replay of 1984.)
	
	And the same is goes that the Holiday Bowl has agreed to 
accept a Big Ten team as long as it has the min. wins of 6. So, 
It is very unlikely that there will not be Big Ten TEam ther.
> 
> There's very little chance that a 6-6 team would be invited to the
> Holiday Bowl (or any other for that matter).
> 
-- 
___ ___ _   _    _       _             _
 |   |  | \/ |  (_  |_| |_| |\ | |\ | | | |\ | timothy-shannon@uiowa.edu 
 |  _|_ |    |   _) | | | | | \| | \| |_| | \| tshannon@CCAD.UIOWA.EDU
From: jayakris@translab.its.uci.edu (R. Jayakrishnan)
Subject: Re: Texas Got Screwed--SWC is a Goner
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Date: 23 Nov 92 17:57:58 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.170811.8615@chpc.utexas.edu> boisseau@chpc.utexas.edu (John R. Boisseau (Jay)) writes:
>
>p.s. I'd be curious to know what other people who saw the ENTIRE game
>though. (If you didn't see the whole game, you can't see what I'm talking
>about... I wouldn't have believed it, either, if i hadn't seen the entire
>game.) This morning, I talked to the first UT-hater that I know
>personally who actually watched the game... and he agreed. Of course, 
>he was GLAD that the officials were biased, since he hates UT, but he
>was sure they were, too.
>-- 
>  John R. Boisseau ("Jay")       


  I saw the entire game (alone, but for my 3 week old baby boy who saw
  his first Longhorn game..). I threw my zapper 5 times and broke it.
  Came very close to throwing my baby, but reason prevailed... I smoked 
  five Marlboros to cool down. Yes, this was the first game in the last
  7 years that I have whined about (good to know that even the *TX* Jay,
  whom I have never seen angry on the net, is upset !)

  YES, we got *ROYALLY SCREWED* !  

  GO HORNS !  take it all out on the Aggies...

  Jay
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: scott@ods.com (Scott Harper)
Subject: Re: Texas Got Screwed--SWC is a Goner
Organization: Optical Data Systems, Inc.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 16:07:51 GMT

John R. Boisseau (Jay) (boisseau@chpc.utexas.edu) wrote:
: game were _biased_... bad, yes, but not biased. And most of the bad
: officiating I have seen has been in the SWC. But I now believe it is
: sometimes _biased_.
: 
: Texas got SCREWED this weekend. Both teams played well enough at times

And to think, just a few weeks ago all the bitching about the SWC refs
was because they were biased *in favor* of A&M and Texas... (remember
UH vs. Texas, Baylor vs. A&M?)

:[long, long, complaint about how the refs beat the t-sips, then...]

: Let me close by saying that Texas could have won this game despite the
: officiating by not making so many mistakes. Texas has more talent, and
: a more balanced offense. Great teams don't let bad call beat them. Texas
: is NOT a great team. They _are_ a good team, though, and deserve to go
: to a bowl, somethin they will probably not do since it now depends on
: beating the Aggies, who look very good with Pullig at QB.

'Nuff said.  Like the Nike commercials say:  Just Do It.

Let me say that I thought the game was poorly officiated.  I think quite
a few games in the SWC were poorly officiated this year.  But, you've
got to get on with things...
-- 
Scott Harper                       Optical Data Systems, Inc.
scott@ods.com                      1101 E. Arapaho Road
(214) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081
From: bharat@cs.uiuc.edu (R. Bharat Rao)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Prediction OSU-Michigan (was Re: Why Michigan sucks..)
Date: 18 Nov 92 17:49:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: m.1992Nov18.174914.15664
Reply-To: bharat@cs.uiuc.edu
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL

JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com writes:
>In article <14713.2b09a27d@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu>
>vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu writes:
>>... and another thing. It looks like the reason Moeller went for
>>the tie against Illinois was because he wanted to wrap up the Big-10
>>Championship WITHOUT having to play Ohio State. Basically he's scared
>>(even though the goofball won't admit it, even Schembechler thinks
>>he's a dork).
>>So his being scared of OSU cost Michigan a chance at the MNC. Too Bad.
>>And it would have been so much fun...  :/
>>-Garrett

>Hmmmm.  I am always a bit curious about someone who posts something and
>then responds to his own post.  But be that as it may, I would like
>to go on record as saying. . . . . . .

>HERE WE GO AGAIN.  DEJA VU.  Just like every year.  The OSU woofers
>come out before the Michigan game and use words like "dick", "dork",
>"they're scared of us", and so on.  It is reminiscent of the
>black knight in "The Holy Grail".  OSU is good and yes, they
>may even beat Michigan.  Then again, Michigan is pretty good,

Here's my "prediction" for the game.  As an Illini, I qualify as a
neutral observer:-).  IMO, Michigan will come out and absolutely pound
OSU to begin -- they wil quickly go up 14-3 or so -- OSU will close to
17-10 or so, but Michigan will put in away to go up 30-13 in the 3rd
and a late OSU surge may make the final score look closer than that...

Hmmmm -- lesseeee; it should be a god game..

Question to William M-Smith: any comments out of Ann Arbor on why
Moeller went for the 2-pointer up 19-15; or did he just admit that he
screwed up in the heat of the momenet (I would respect him more if he
said that than if he gave a BS reason).

Bharat
 
--
R. Bharat Rao                          E-mail: bharat@cs.uiuc.edu 
AI Group, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology
405 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801  (217)337-6498(H)
Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana
OFFICE: (217)244-0292, 333-5978 (NOTE new numbers)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: whn6479@rigel.tamu.edu (I'm Will Newnum. Who the Hell are you?)
Subject: A&M's "weak" schedule
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: Texas A&M University, Academic Computing Services
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:36:00 GMT

I wonder how many out there nationally realize one of the biggest reasons for
the SWC remaining together up to this point.  The TX legislature has threatened
to slash the funding for us or Texas if we leave the conference.  In short,
they don't give a damn whether I get an education or not.  They just want the 
SWC to be preserved.  SMU deciding not to drop from div. I will make it very
difficult to leave.  
     Also, I wonder how many of the people out there who trash A&M have seen us
play.  I know I've seen very little of Miami, Alabama, or FSU.  The ABC folks
up in NYC seem to think that I want to see nothing but Big 10/Pac 10 games.  
Considering the rumors about us joining the Big 8 or SEC, and the fact that
they are closer to this part of the country, I'd love to see some of their 
games.  I'll admit that A&M hasn't played consistantly well.  However, there
is an unbelievable amount of talent on the team, and they always get their act
together at some point in the 2nd half and pull out a victory.
     Anyway, that's my $.02 worth.

                          Will Newnum '94
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 13:47:35 EST
From: <JCT3@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Lee Corso at A&M TODAY (11/18/92)



In article <1992Nov18.152608.14424@bnr.ca>, ped@BNR.CA (Pedro Luna) says:
>
>Howdy!  From The Dallas Morning News...
>
>Lee Corso will be in College Station recording a feature for ESPN's
>College Gameday.  RC is quoted as saying that "he has a lot of guts
>coming here."
>
>Beat the Class of '90 hell outta TCU!
>
>PEdro '90

This reminds me of 1989, when Tim Brando started reporting
unsubstantiated rumors that alumni were trying to buy out
Bill Curry's contract.  Brando was highly critical, not just
of the alumni, but the university and its students.

During the infamous "Hurricane Bowl," ESPN had a crew in one of
the Tuscaloosa bars; in the middle of a LIVE FROM TUSCALOOSA
segment about five guys jumped right behind the reporter and yelled
"Tim Brando sucks!!"

Then in the spring Brando showed up to cover a Bama basketball
game and got about as warm a reception.



Jim Thomas

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rwturner@IASTATE.EDU (Richard W Turner)
Subject: Re: HAWKEYE BOWL CHANCES
Reply-To: rwturner@IASTATE.EDU (Richard W Turner)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:25:19 GMT

In article <1ebu74INNmqj@haydn.crhc.uiuc.edu>, ttsai@crhc.uiuc.edu (Timothy
Tsai) writes:
> demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man) writes:
> >	I seem to remember an awful Michigan team (6-5) accepting a bid to play
> >BYU (yuck, when they were 12-0 against high school teams), and losing. 
Letting
> >BYU claim #1 at 13-0.
> Yepp.  The WAC was not a strong conference in 1984, sort of like the Big-10
> this year.  Well, maybe not that bad.  :^) :^)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Timothy Tsai              Celtics Rule!!!
> ttsai@uiuc.edu            Let's go Mets!!!

Last night it was announced that if Iowa beats
Minnesota, then they will accept an invitation
to the Copper Bowl, no matter what the outcome
of the Michigan State - Illinois game is.
The Winner of the Mich St - Illini game will
go to the Holiday Bowl.
Hayden Fry was quoted as saying it was fitting
his seniors should go to a bowl because
they had gone to 3 bowls the last 4 years.

R. Turner
From: sl45z@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: When is the Heisman "Awarded"?
Date: 19 Nov 92 10:42:31 MDT
Organization: Utah State University


 	In light of  Faulk's 4 minute mile against Hawaii, I was wondering when
exactly the Heisman will be announced.  I know it is before any bowl games, but
is it after all regular season games?  I'm curious if Faulk will get it before
or after he runs for 200yds against Miami :).  (Maybe Syracuse can break a
couple LB's knees for SDSU) :)
-- 
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
     |	Travis L. Clements |   		I'M TAKING THE WIFE!!
     |  N. Logan, Utah     |                                                   
|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+|+||+
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: dbrown@newssun.med.miami.edu (Daniel Brown)
Subject: 'Canes, 'Cuse, FSU-UM showdown, and Stanford meets Penn State?!!
Organization: University of Miami, School Of Medicine
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:27:54 GMT

I finished looking at the Herald's sport section this morning
and wanted to post the following:

The Blockbuster Bowl would like to get the bowl of great 
coaches by matching Stanford up with PSU (Walsh and Paterno).
They are a little concerned about the ticket sales, however,
after the horrible outing last year (let's face it, the 
crowd Stanford draws isn't going to break any records).  Of
course, they first have to await the Fiesta's decision.
(Personally, I think that Stanford can should go to a bowl
where there's a higher ranked team...)

The hype about this weekend's Big East showdown continued with
a front (sports-) page article about Syracuse's QB Marvin 
Quarterback, certainly one of the best in the country.  The
caption was about his triple threat to Miami: passing, option,
and running.  It's going to be a good one!!  The big question
mark is whether or not Syracuse's secondary can withstand
UM's passing attack: in the past they've give up over an 
average of 200 ypg passing.

A source from Vegas said that, the matchups below would have the
following lines

	#1 Miami vs #2 Alabama 		(UM by 5)
	#1 Miami vs #2 Texas A&M	(UM by 10)
	#1 Miami vs #2 FSU		(UM by 1)

Obviously these would change if Miami loses this weekend...

****************************************************************
Dan Brown				  ccc  a  n  n eee sss !
					  c   a a nn n e   s   !
dbrown@newssun.med.miami.edu		  c   aaa n nn ee  sss !
					  c   a a n  n e     s 
Department of Orthopedics		  ccc a a n  n eee sss !
Project for Computer-Aided Pain Diagnosis
****************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: JHARTLEY@cmsa.gmr.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Penn State Should Withdraw
Date: 18 Nov 92 13:21:05 GMT
Organization: GM Research Labs

In article <1992Nov17.211223.19183@walter.bellcore.com>
lein@cat.uucp (John Leinaweaver) writes:
>As far as PSU (if they beat Pitt) being 7-4 and going to a bowl, one
>could make the same claim about Notre Dame if they lost to Michigan, BC,
>Penn St, and USC.
>Amazing, at 7-4, Notre Dame would still earn a better NYD bid than a
>7-4 PSU and the Irish fans still think they're being robbed.

Huh?  Notre Dame crushed BC (remember them?), edged Penn State, and tied
Michigan.  The USC game is in doubt at this point.  Who said anything
about being robbed?  I wrote a note to those PSU people who last
year were in a swivet about ND getting the Sugar Bowl bid early.
I then said the same people, if they had any integrity, would make
the same complaints about a PSU team this year which got the bid BEFORE
the first snap of the ball, has beaten teams with records like
3-7, 1-9, 3-6, etc. and has lost to every good team (ND, BC, Miami)
and mediocre team (BYU) they have played.

Your little fit of fancy about ND still earning a better bid with a 7-4
record seems odd, since there is no way that ND will have that record
(nor is it a given that PSU will either, even though Pittsburgh is
not that good this year).  Why not just say that Team X, if they lost to
these here 4 teams would have the same record as my team?  Why not
discuss facts and not your hallucinations?
From: vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Why Michigan sucks..
Date: 18 Nov 92 06:55:09 GMT
Article-I.D.: ohstpy.14713.2b09a27d

.. and another thing. It looks like the reason Moeller went for
the tie against Illinois was because he wanted to wrap up the Big-10
Championship WITHOUT having to play Ohio State. Basically he's scared
(even though the goofball won't admit it, even Schembechler thinks
he's a dork).

So his being scared of OSU cost Michigan a chance at the MNC. Too Bad.

And it would have been so much fun...  :/

-Garrett
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: yoonho@taipei.eecs.umich.edu (Yoonho Park)
Subject: Re: Michigan: The Great Paper Tiger
Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 20:15:57 GMT

Greg writes (in response to Bill's post):
>The most important STAT that i noticed was the SCORE: 22-22.

The scoreboard is definitely an important stat.  What about conference
rankings?  That's a pretty important STAT.  Which bowl will the Illini
be going to this year?  Where are they going to be doing NYD?  Yes, the
Illini played a great game.  They definitely flustered the Wolverines.
They knocked them down in the polls.  They knocked them out of the MNC
picture.  What more do you want?

>Besides, we are an UNRANKED team.

Once again...  Oh boy, this is definitely something I would brag
about... :)

>Hey GUY, I hope your future responses are a tad more polite.

Uh, when did Bill post a rude response to you?  I know Bill.  He's a
nice guy.  Well, when you're fighting him for a rebound under the glass
he's not a nice guy, but that's different.  I think you might be
interpreting some of his sarcasm as rudeness.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yoonho Park                                    Software Systems Research Lab
yoonho@eecs.umich.edu                  The University of Michigan--Ann Arbor
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: daniel@raphael.acpub.duke.edu (Daniel Crawford)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Georgia 14, Auburn 10
Date: 17 Nov 92 22:04:09 GMT
 <1992Nov16.203105.3467@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov> <7044@news.duke.edu>
 <1992Nov17.174514.14501@infonode.ingr.com>

In article <1992Nov17.174514.14501@infonode.ingr.com>, 
knightb@abulafia.b21.ingr.com (William B. Knight) writes:  
|> 
|> And on Hearst's 64 yd TD reception, Georgia had 2 men in motion and so
|> on and so forth.  I thought the refs did a pretty good job of staying out
|> of the game and only mildly blew it at the end.  AU definitely got screwed,
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|> but should have run 2 pass plays before trying the run up the middle.
|> 

Here are a few quotes from today's Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

"SEC ATTEMPTS TO CLARIFY END OF GEORGIA-AUBURN"

"The SEC statement said, first, that NCAA rules 'do not allow for
the clock to be stopped on a fumble when it is obvious the ball has
been recovered by the offensive team.  The official's responsibility
is to mark the spot of the recovery.
"'2. Once the teams have cleared, the ball should be spotted by the
umpire at the progress point marked by the covering official.  The
referee shall then utilize the following procedure as outlined in the
Football Officials Manual:
"'"After each down the referee is required to go to the approximate
position of the ball.  He should then check the down and distance with
the linesman, announce and indicate the new down, then declare the ball
ready for play by giving the ready signal [the time elapsed during this
procedure is approximately four to six seconds]."
"' The referee is not to vary the timing of this procedure throughout
the game regardless of the condition.  This could result in the loss
of a down or an inaccurate placement of the ball.'"


It is apparent, then, that the officials acted exactly as the rules dictate.
IMHO, AU "screwed" themselves by calling a running play to begin with.  

Oh, well.

T. Daniel Crawford
Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry
University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602
(Not a UGA fan, just a grad student from Duke, desparately waiting for hoops!)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college