HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jakhan@IASTATE.EDU (Javed Ahmed Khan)
Subject: Re: Pakistan
Reply-To: jakhan@IASTATE.EDU (Javed Ahmed Khan)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 05:15:55 GMT



The disagreement I have with the ideology of Iqbal and Co. is that
they sought to restrict the application of the message of brotherhood 
taught by Islam only to people labelled muslims. 

The possible interpretation of the meaning of the word "muslim" to include *all*
who practice the essence and spirit of the teachings of the Quran, irrespective
of the fact that they are legally labeled muslim or not, was rejected. The
political association which the ulema usually make (and which Iqbal lapped up
with fervour) with the religion degrades, IMO, the philosophical and spiritual
intent of the message of the Quran.  

The "freedom of thought" that Iqbal so desperately seeked never really touched
him. He was sold heart and soul to the age old concept of a political entity of
an islamic society which had caught the imagination of the "scholars" since
the formation of the caliphate. He did not have the courage to explore a new
interpretation of the Quran that would look at people as humans rather than
religious labels. He never really looked at Hinduism with an open mind. He just
couldn't free himself from the "islamic" blinkers he had put on and could
never come to terms with Hindus and their beliefs. He was so dependent on the
history of Arabia for inspiration that he never gave himself a chance to seek
some inspiration from the history of his own land and civilisation.

Perhaps if he had trusted his people more than he did, the tragedy could have
been averted. If he had shown a greater respect and understanding for his
neighbors religious beliefs, he could have got more understanding and respect
for his own. 

Unfortunately he didn't and we paid the price.

--Javed.
    



 
  
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: dbose@aem.umn.edu (Deepak Bose)
Subject: Re: DISGUSTED!!!!!!!
Keywords: all the *F* words!
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 22:17:21 GMT

shamim@onyx.egr.msu.edu (Tariq Shamim) writes:

>India and Hindus dont need any more defame or disgrace, as long as you hold an
>Indian Passport/nationality.

>		My sympathies with Indians

>Tariq Shamim

DEAR TARIQ ,

	I FAIL TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE WORLD IS SO CRUEL

	TO YOU PAKISTANIS . ( YEH DUNIYA BADI ZAALIM HAI)

	HINDUS BREAK THE MASJIDS AND KILL THOUSANDS OF

	MUSLIMS , BUT INSTEAD PAKISTAN GETS BRANDED AS
	 
	A TERRORIST STATE . ( HAI YEH ZAALIM DUNIYA )

	HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !

	THE BEST PART IS , WHEN THE PAKISTANIS TRY TO

	HOLD A VERY VERY PEACEFUL DEMONSTRATION TO PROTEST

	AGAINST THE DEMOLITION OF THEIR MASJID IN A 

	MUSLIM COUNTRY, LIKE UAE , THEY ARE CHUCKED OUT OF THAT
	 
	COUNTRY .

		HAI YEH ZAALIM DUNIYA !!!

	DEAR TARIQ , PLEASE TRY NOT TO SHOW YOUR PAKISTANI PASSPORT

	TO ANYONE IN AMERICA , HE MIGHT SUSPECT YOU TO BE A TERRORIST .

		HAI YEH ZAALIM DUNIYA !!!!

	I AGAIN FEEL SORRY FOR YOU AND YOUR TERRORIST STATE !


	HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!


	PAKISTAN   ZINDABAD !!

	HA HA HA HA HA !!

	HO HO HO HO HO !!

Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: jakhan@IASTATE.EDU (Javed Ahmed Khan)
Subject: Re: Moslems
Reply-To: jakhan@IASTATE.EDU (Javed Ahmed Khan)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 19:50:17 GMT



==============================================================================
>  
>  You will be well advised to read the latest issue of Time mag. on this
                                                         ^^^^^^^
subject.
>  The UN and many human rights and womens organisations have documented
systematic mass rapes of *thousands* of women, most of them being mulsim women
along with a few Croat women. These crimes have been and are still being
committed by Serbs in Bosnia. Th> ere are reports that women are being
deliberately being raped and confined till they deliver unwanted Serb
impregnated babies. Girls as small as 6 yrs. old have been repeatedly
gang-raped
for days and many have died in the ordeal.
==============================================================================


I have a correction to make. The article on the rapes in Bosnia appeared in
*Newsweek magazine*  Jan 4 '93 issue. It was the cover story.


--Javed.
Xref: sparky soc.culture.pakistan:18765 soc.culture.bangladesh:7068 soc.culture.indian:41920
From: imustafa@slate.mines.colorado.edu (MUSTAFA IBRAHIM )
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.indian
Subject: Re: Difference
Date: 25 Dec 92 04:11:46 GMT
Organization: Colorado School of Mines

In article <1hdm29INNm49@hsc.usc.edu> banerjee@hsc.usc.edu (Samit Banerjee) writes:
>In article <BzsFxo.Cys@news.cso.uiuc.edu> nd3375@meibm5.cen.uiuc.edu (Nishit Dey) writes:
>>
>>	Question - What is the difference between Mustafa Idiot and a DONKEY?
>>
>>	Answer - Hmm.. let me think..  Yeah  Mustafa has a longer tail.
>>
>>	Hey fafat , you want to add anything?
>
>
>
>If you dont mind my saying so, you should not abuse and insult the DONKEY in
>this fashion. If you must, compare it to something more tangible and hopefully
>on a similar intellectual level.
>
>Finally, I would not be surprised if the SPCA and other animal right's
>groups came down hard on you for your temerity in comparing a DONKEY with
>a much more primitive lifeform  and one that has long been surpassed by most
>other species in the evolutionary scale of things.
>
>Samit
>
    It seems this guys belongs to the donkey family. thats why he 
   cannot tolerate any referecne to  donkey :-)))))))))))))))
     
>
>-- 
>Samit Banerjee,			    |  
>University of Southern California   |  A man who smiles when things go wrong,
>Internet: banerjee@scf.usc.edu      |  has found somebody to blame it on.
>Bellnet : (213) 342-1401            |
From: hyder@cs.utexas.edu (Syed Irfan Hyder)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: Pakistan
Date: 22 Dec 1992 12:18:52 -0600
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: crewcut.cs.utexas.edu

In article <1992Dec21.214308.6431@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> aftab@cesdis1.gsfc.nasa.gov (Aftab Ahmad) writes:

>	While dicussing Pakistan's birth one must keep in mind that Pakistan
>was not the only solution, at least Jinnah thought so. My question to Irfan
>is what would be your position if the Congress leaders accepted all demands of
>Jinnah (or Muslim League) and Jinnah accepted giving up on Pakistan?
>
Totally irrelevant question. My answer today is not going to make
any impressions of things that be. However, the million dollar
question today is not what should or should not have been done
in the past, but what could or should be done "today" so as
to make the future better and brighter!!!

That has been my objective from the very start. I read history 
not to debate all  "possible" outcomes that  "could have" happened.
I read history to inform me of what "did" happen. Who made it happen. 
Debating what could have happened is an excercise in futility.
From: naufal@ocf.berkeley.edu (Naufal A. Khan)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: by Faiz Ahmed Faiz
Date: 3 Jan 1993 23:02:22 GMT
Organization: U. C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: bigbang.berkeley.edu



Mujh se pahli see mohabbat mere mehboob na maang
	main ne samjha tha ke too hai to darakhshan hai hayat
	tera gham hai to gham-e-dahr kaa jhagra kya hai
	teri soorat se hai aalam main baharon ko sabaat
	teri aankhon ke siwa dunya main rakha kya hai
	too jo mil jaye to taqdeer nigoon ho jaye
	yoon na tha main ne faqat chaha tha ke yoon ho jaye
aur bhi gham hain zamane main mohabbat ke siwa 
rahatain aur bhi hain wasl kee rahat ke siwa
	an-ginat sadyon ke tareek behemana tilism
	resham-o-islis-o-kamkhwaab main bunvaye huay
	ja-bija biktay huay koocha-o-bazaar main jism
	khaak main luthday huay khoon main nehlaye huay
	jism taptay huay amraz kay tanooron se
	peep bahti huay galtay huay naasooron se
	laut jaati hai udhar ko bhi nazar kiya keejiyay
	ab bhi dilkash hai tera husn magar kiya keejiyay
aur bhi gham hain zamaanay main mohabbat ke siwa
rahatain aur bhi hain wasl kee rahat ke siwa
mujh se pahli see mohabbat mere mehboob na maang

						--Faiz 

p.s. I am writing this from memory so please excuse any mistakes.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.bangladesh
From: milind@agni.cc.nd.edu (Milind Saraph)
Subject: Re: The Quran and the Modern Science
Reply-To: milind@agni.cc.nd.edu (Milind Saraph)
Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame 
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 01:58:02 GMT

From: hyder@cs.utexas.edu (Syed Irfan Hyder)

>Note:  Allah presents the signs in Quran with a clear qualification.
>The signs are ONLY for those who "understand", "reflect", and who
>"ponder". 

>People have often doubted these signs. This is what Quran says
>about such people:

>Sura 6:

>25. And of them is he who hearkens to you, and We have cast
>veils over their hearts lest they understand it and a heaviness into
>their ears; and even if they see every sign they will not believe in
>it; so much so that when they come to you they only dispute with
>you; those who disbelieve say: This is naught but the stories of
>the ancients.

Note that, devout believers like Pervez Hoodbhoy and Abdus Salam,
(who wrote a foreword to Hoodbhoy's book, heartily agreeing with
the author) are criticizing Bucaille.  They are not questioning 
the signs presented in the Quran or the divinity of the Quran,
but the dubious exercise indulged in by Bucaille.

Although, you do not explicitly say so, you seem to want to lump
unbelievers like me (and others) and believers like Hoodbhoy,
Salam (and others on SCP).  You seem to be questioning the ability
of people who do not agree with Bucaille, to "understand, reflect
and ponder" the meaning of the signs.  You seem to be close to
condemning those who do not agree with your favorite interpretation,
and hint at eternal damnation for these.

If your belief system compels you to believe that all unbelievers
are destined for the fire of hell, that is fine with me.  I do not
share your belief system.  Unfortunately, you are condemning a
large group of people who share your belief system, but criticise
silly and bizarre nature of Bucaille's arguments.

-- Milind Saraph

Xref: sparky soc.culture.pakistan:19002 soc.culture.indian:42464 soc.culture.bangladesh:7217
From: minhaszt@ucbeh.san.uc.edu
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.bangladesh
Subject: Question to Steve (was Re: The Quran and the Modern Science)
Date: 1 Jan 93 03:23:36 EST
Distribution: world
Organization: Univ. of Cincinnati

In article <1993Jan1.042126.20446@news.eng.convex.com>, gardner@convex.com (Steve Gardner) writes:
> In article <1992Dec31.230742.18251@news.nd.edu> milind@agni.cc.nd.edu (Milind Saraph) writes:
>>Divine causes and supernatural entities are outside the purview of 
>>science.  Science has nothing to say about these.
> 	Nonsense.  Science has plenty to say for divine causes and supernatural
> 	entities: it calls them superstitition.  
> 
> 
> 
> 							smg
> 
> 

no. science does not call it superstition. scientists, and atheist scientists
do that. do not mix up science with "scientists". they are two different
entities and never the two shall meet.

zafar

oh btw "scientists" from muslim countries do not call the closeness of what the
quran says about natural phenomenon with what is generally observed as
"superstitious". what is your opinion about them?
From: an4277@anon.penet.fi
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Happy new year scp netters!
Date: 31 Dec 92 12:38:51 GMT
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: soc.culture.pakistan


Hi folks! Happy New Year. Lets stop abusing this forum and put a
stop to lewd language and racist comments. Please. Pretty Please!


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.bangladesh
From: dbose@aem.umn.edu (Deepak Bose)
Subject: Re: A news item
Organization: University of Minnesota
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 01:36:22 GMT

hasan@cs.washington.edu (Shams Hasan) writes:
>>

>My dear Mr. Deb Chatter jee,


>WE AMERICANS ARE WELL AWARE OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FUNCTION
>A MAN HAS IN INDIA/BANGLADESH.... IE, MAKING BABIES, AND MORE BABIES, UNTILL
				       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


	THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU AND FOLLOWERS OF ISLAM DO , KEEP FOUR

	WIVES AND MULTIPLY LIKE A BACTERIA .

				UNDERSTAND YOU IDIOT !!!!  
	

	WHY DIDN'T YOU TAKE THESE POOR FOLLOWERS OF ISLAM OUT INDIA

	IN 1947 ALONG WITH YOU ?



>THEY SPILL OVER IN THE STREETS OF BOMBAY AND CALCUTTA, WHILE THEIR POOR WOMEN
>FOLKS WORK LIKE HELL ALL DAY.....                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!

  IT IS WELL KNOWN TO THE WHOLE WORLD HOW THE HARAAMI ISLAMIC REPUBLIC

  OF PAKISTAN TREATS ITS WOMEN . AND HOW WOMEN IN GENERAL ARE TREATED

  IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD .

	DON'T SAY WHATEVER YOU LIKE JUST FOR THE SAKE OF SAYING SOMETHING

	HAVE SOME SENSE IN YOUR DUMB HEAD AND DON'T MAKE A FOOL OF YOURSELF

	LIKE THIS !!


>Best Regards,
>Shams Hasan., AN IDIOT

		PAKISTAN ( A TERRORIST STATE ) ZINDABAD !!!!


		HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!
From: an4333@anon.penet.fi
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Trying
Date: 2 Jan 93 00:45:42 GMT
Organization: Anonymous contact service
X-Anonymously-To: soc.culture.pakistan

Just trying to find out, how this donkey Mustafa has become so intellegent
He now a days uses this service.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind system, any replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.bangladesh
From: shamshoo@shelley.u.washington.edu (Shams Hasan)
Subject: Re: Shams Hasan, stop the blasphemy
Summary: Thanks. 
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 22:43:09 GMT

In article <BzpC3F.B0D@news.cso.uiuc.edu> nd3375@meibm5.cen.uiuc.edu (Nishit Dey) writes:
>hasan@cs.washington.edu (Shams Hasan) writes:
>
>
>>Dear Mr. Ni shit,
>
>Dear Mr. Sham (noun, counterfeit, imitation, fake)
>
>>I donot know how closely you have been reading my articles, but, if you were
>>reading it carefully, you would notice that this guy wether being an American
>>of Pakistani birth and heritage, wonders why on earth do people like you and
>>this Singh guy, who have yet to send an article about Pakistan that shows
>>they have even visited it, let alone known what Pakistani culture, issues are
>>continuing to post here.
>
>I don't know about Mr. Singh, but I don't have interest or time to read SCP.
>If you want to keep SCP clean then make sure that when you follow-up some
>article your garbage is not thrown to other news groups like SCI and SCB.
>
>
>>Spare me of your mumbo jumbo on Americana and Desi stuff. Belligerency is good
>>for kids, shows they will grow up with some spunk. For adults it is lunacy of
>>the mentally deranged and semi-comatose.
>
>I am not doing any mumbo jumbo. Since in every posting you use to write
>atleast few lines giving your citizenship status and all that, I thought
>if I point it out to others then you don't have to take the trouble of
>writing it again and again. In other words I wanted to do you a favor.
>
>
>>Now, if you guys want to tackle some things like possible improvements in our
>>education system at the Intermediate level in Pakistan, or another aspect of
>>the society, I am all EARS......
>
>As I have written above, I don't have time or interest.
>
>>Best Regards,
>>Shams Hasan.
>
>
>Warm wishes
>
>Nishit

Dear Nishit,

Thanks. And I apologize for obnoxiousness on other newsgroups.
Will strive towards keeping discussions to SCP only whenever possible.


Best Regards,
Shams Hasan.
From: khan@ces.cwru.edu (Mansoor Khan)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
Subject: Re: Moslems
Date: 25 Dec 92 05:30:01 GMT
Organization: Computer Engineering and Science, Case Western Reserve University
NNTP-Posting-Host: king.ces.cwru.edu




I am from Turkey and I noticed that there is something very funny
about all the world conflicts. ( I am not a practicing moslem)
				^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
			Even if you were, the info you put down 
			is not incorrect. There is nothing funny.
			It is just a matter of whether the cup is
			half empty or half full.

>Israel-Palestinian issue ( Moslems Vs Jews)
>Cyprus Problem           ( Moslems Vs Catholics)
>German Ethnic trouble    ( Moslems ( Turks) Vs Germans)
>Bosnian issue            ( Moslems Vs Christians)
>Iraq - Kuwait strife     ( Moslems Vs Moslems)
>Iran - Iraq              ( ditto)
>Iraq Vs Kurds            ( ditto)
>Indian temple issue      ( Moslems Vs Hindus)
>Burmese ethnic problems  ( Moslems Vs Buddhists)
>Malaysian ethnic trouble ( Moslems Vs Chinese)
>Somalian problem         ( Moslems vs Moslems)
>Armenia                  ( Moslems Vs christians)



>	Almost every conceivable problem in the world is caused by moslems.
>Also, undoubtably all the major barbaric regimes in the world are run by
>Moslems ( Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Yemen, Iran, Pakistan just to name a few)
>and the major terrorist nations ( except Cuba) are all moslem ( Pakistan, Iran,
>cyria, Lybia, Jordan). Turkey is the ONLY moslem country which is secular.
>What does this tell us about our religion and our culture? It makes me wonder!

	For some reason, I believe that you are not Turkish.
	How come your name is Ahmed and not Ahmet ?
	Also it is hard to believe that Turks actully know about
	problems in Malaysia or Burma. It is too much to expect
	knowledge like yours from an arab, iranian, or a turk.
	You seem like a Pakistani or Indian. Are you, Mr. Ahmed(t)?!?!?!



>Irfan Ahmed
>Sys. Admin., Calico Tech.

Mansoor Khan
Cleveland.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan
From: jakhan@IASTATE.EDU (Javed Ahmed Khan)
Subject: Re: Pakistan is lilbit different from Israel
Reply-To: jakhan@IASTATE.EDU (Javed Ahmed Khan)
Organization: Iowa State University
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 23:11:02 GMT

In article <ljs5nmINN942@pageboy.cs.utexas.edu>, hyder@cs.utexas.edu (Syed Irfan
Hyder) writes:
> In article <1992Dec26.222747@IASTATE.EDU> jakhan@IASTATE.EDU (Javed Ahmed
Khan) writes:
> >
> >
> >Was it a referendrum on the creation of Pakistan?
> >
> 
> It was a refrendum on whether Muslim League represents the  Muslims
> of subcontinent or not. The vote clearly demonstrated that indeed
> Muslim League is the representative of the aspiration of the Muslims
> of subcontinent. As to what the aspirations were, read the slogans
> and manifesto on which M.L. contested the elections. Note objective
> resolution of M.L. of 1940 was not a secret in 1946!
> 
> Pakistan ka mutlub kiya la illaha illa allah
> 
> was the most popular slogan used by M.L. to rally 
> the Muslims around the M.L's objectives. Read any
> book on the events of that election.
> 





There is a certain fallacy in the assumption being made. 

As an example there is a very recent event which will bring out the fallacy 
in the argument:

The BJP govt. in Uttar Pradesh (U.P.) came to power in the state on the sole
plank of demolishing (which they ephemistically refered to as reloctaing) the
mosque and building a Temple to Lord Ram in its place. They won with
overwhelming majority in the state which saw the Congress being wiped out. The
BJP govt. publicly claimed that since it came to power on the plank that they
would build the temple at the very site the Babri masjid stood, the courts had
no jurisdiction in the matter. They claimed that Hindus(presumably) had voted to
bring down the mosque and build a temple there and was as good as a 
referendum, as far as they were concerned.

Obviously the central govt. and the courts thought otherwise.


The point is that the fact that the ML won in muslim majority provinces in that
election you refer to cannot serve as a referendum on the creation of Pakistan
simply because that was not a referendum. It was a vote to elect a govt, for 
the provinces and not the formation of Pakistan.


--Javed.
Xref: sparky soc.culture.pakistan:19046 soc.culture.indian:42560 soc.culture.bangladesh:7242
From: fafat@aludra.usc.edu (Vijay Fafat)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.indian,soc.culture.bangladesh
Subject: Re: The Quran and the Modern Science
Date: 2 Jan 1993 12:12:53 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

Salam writes:
>> 	You still don't get it, do you? Science can be talked about by
>> 	the religious peepuls but it cannot be used alongside a divine
>> 	being. Science rejects a divine cause for anything.
>
>        IT IS A MYTH. Science doesn't deny either.

	O yea? tell me a story then.

>> 
>> 	An interpretation cannot have the status of a "scientist's 
>> 	interpretation" just because a scientist (a poor one at that)
>> 	furthers it. It has to satisfy the basic tenets of Science and
>> 	God does not fit into it.
>> 
>        That is ridiculous. If a scientist interpret something through his/her
                             &^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>scientific knowledge then it is a "scientist's interpretation". You may
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

	You finally got it. Whew! And what Milind has been pointing out is
	that B has acted more as Muslim-ethos-panderer than as a scientist.
	He has'nt subjected his interpretations to the rigours which
	science demands. To that extent, he's a parody of a scientist.


>> 	Ever hear of Anthropic Principle? When physicists talk about God,
>> 	they use it metaphorically. Paul Davies points out just this.
>
>     Metaphysically, to be more precise. So do many theologians. Have heard
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

	Then you should be checking your definitions of "metaphorical" and 
	"metaphysical". 
	
>Prof. John Polkinghon, a mathematical physicist from Cambridge and now an
>Anglican clergyman? He talk about God and very "conventional" God by
>reinterperating the Bible.

	So? Just because a Nobel in Physics says God exists does not mean
	anything. He has to justify his claims on a benchmark laid
	down by the scientific body. Talking in air is a no-no in science :)
	
	FFT

Xref: sparky soc.culture.pakistan:18920 soc.culture.indian:42208
From: alis@prism.CS.ORST.EDU (Sal-Myster)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.indian
Subject: Anyone in University of Arkansas?
Keywords: INFORMATION.
Date: 29 Dec 92 07:24:49 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: CS Dept, Oregon St. U.
NNTP-Posting-Host: prism.cs.orst.edu


	Greetings!
	I would like some information about this university for myself, its
	enviroment, and other necessary facts. I would appreciate it if
	anybody either in that university or with knowledge, can help me in 
	anyway.

	Thankfully,
	Salman.
Xref: sparky soc.culture.pakistan:18793 soc.culture.bangladesh:7088 soc.culture.indian:41967
From: fafat@aludra.usc.edu (Vijay Fafat)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.pakistan,soc.culture.bangladesh,soc.culture.indian
Subject: Re: Difference
Date: 25 Dec 1992 10:56:19 -0800
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
NNTP-Posting-Host: aludra.usc.edu

Bukhari Mustafa Ibrahim writes:
>It does not suit to a person who is the preacher of the most tolerant
>religion in the world (after the demolition of Babri mosque) 
>:-)))))))))))
   ^^^^^^^^^^^
	Hey Mustafa, I'm curious. How do you waddle around with so many
	double chins?? I tht you were allowed to have max 4 of them...

	FFT