HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: phil@rahul.net (Phil Gustafson)
Subject: Re: End of the world. Rapture...
Organization: a2i network
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 21:33:44 GMT

In article <27062@dog.ee.lbl.gov> TWChan@lbl.gov (Terry Chan) writes:
>_Fringes of Reason:  A Whole Earth Catalog_, ed. Ted Schulz.  
>Harmony Books, 1989, 1st ed.
>
>Terry "Sounds good, but is it?" Chan

I would say so.  And I would say that _The Fringes of Reason_, paper 4to,
ISBN 0-517-57165, belongs on every true afu'er's shelf.  Now, here we have
the theory of the hollow earth. We have perpetual-motion machines, but 
surprizingly no Dean Drive.  We have spontaneous human combustion, with
neat grisly photos of piles of ashes with leftover feet and torsos.  Not
to mention J. R. "Bob" Dobbs.  And Jamie Sams, a one-time country singer
who is currently the channel for Leah, a sixth-density entity from the
planet Venus six centuries in the future.

Even Wagner and Anna Russell couldn't make this stuff up.  I'd believe
the whole story of Seigfried and his horny aunts before I bought the
"Hundredth Monkey" story, herein quoted at great length.

Phil "In the Whole Earth tradition, the book points to a couple hundred
other books.  Buy it and get smart." Gustafson
-- 
Phil Gustafson <phil@rahul.net>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,alt.folklore.computers
From: oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Tig Stone)
Subject: Re: Jackpotting ATM's for $$$$
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Amherst
	<13363@bnr-rsc.UUCP> <1992Nov11.134645.22244@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov>
	<1992Nov13.022445.12196@cs.uow.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:23:16 GMT


In article <1992Nov13.022445.12196@cs.uow.edu.au> u8802356@cs.uow.edu.au (Stephen Lance Rogan) writes:

> I have heard that the machines are sometimes fitted with motion detectors
> hooked up to dye bombs to combat this sort of thing. Yes, you can rip
> the things out of the wall, but by the time you get the money 
> out it covered in dye and useless.

> ObUL : Winston Churchill proposed this idea long ago, but everyone laughed
> at him because they had never heard of ATMs.

	Wasn't this because Churchill was an alien from outer space
sent on a mission to save the planet earth from the Forces of Evil?
Oops.  Sorry.

--
Tig Stone 
(oldman@titan.ucc.umass.edu)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: bwatson@nyx.cs.du.edu (bruce watson)
Subject: Re: Solar time
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 20:37:44 GMT

In article <17563@bcars664.bnr.ca> Henry.Troup@BNR.CA writes:
>
>|>>plot of the mathematical function is called an ... ummm ... orrery? no,
>|>>incubus? no, inclinometer? not even close ... huh.  I don't remember. 
>|>I think you mean Lissajous. I don't know if the "odd figure-8 shaped
>
>|>>It doesn't vary by much, but it *is* observable.
>
>analemma.  Someone recently photographed it, in a 365 exposure frame. 
>Neat trick.
>                            
It was Dennis di Cicco, first printed in Sky and Telescope magazine,
June 1979 issue, "Exposing the Analemma". "The camera was rigidly mounted
in the same position throughout the year. Using a filter to block all but
the sun, 44 separate exposures were made at about seven day intervals and
at precisely 8:30 am EST. Three times during the year, the camera's
shutter was opened at sunrise and closed at 8:25 am EST. The resultant
streaks show the diurnal path of the sun near the time of the summer
and winter solsitces and the analemma's crossover point. Finally, to
record foreground detail and the background of the sky a normal
exposure was made. All told there were a total of 48 exposures."

--
Bruce Watson  wats@nyx.cs.du.edu  Toy Cows, Toy Cows in Africa, Toy Cows
Xref: sparky alt.folklore.urban:28357 alt.religion.kibology:4653
From: kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,alt.religion.kibology
Subject: Re: CAN YOU PROVE IT DID NOT HAPPEN?
Date: 13 Nov 92 04:41:07 GMT
Organization: Two rooms filled with typography, in downtown Boston

In article <9489@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> tjw+@pitt.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov11.202850.4713@ncsu.edu>, tlhayes@eos.ncsu.edu
>(TERRI LYNN HAYES) writes:
>
>> 1)  I thought that Majel Barrett was Gene Roddenberry's wife and
>
>ASK KIBO about this.

My god, my .signature has been affecting the minds of the younger
generation.  

BY the way, TERRY, why DO you capitalize some WORDS?  HAVE you BEEN
READING those COMIC BOOKS AGAIN?

>"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin

Terry, Terry, it's still "Whorfin", as I pointed out several months back.
No relation to Sapir-Whorfian hypotheses or Lt. Worf.

								-- K.
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: csuley@cs.cornell.edu (Christopher Suley)
Subject: Billiard Ball UL
Summary: exploding balls!
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 01:50:51 GMT

I heard that if you put a standard billiard ball in your oven at
500 degrees Fahrenheit, it will explode.

Has anyone else heard/tried this?
From: tjw@vms.cis.pitt.edu (TJ Wood)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Question about "T." in James T. Kirk !!!!!!  (As seen on TV)
Summary: Laugh while you can, Monkey Kirk
Date: 6 Nov 92 22:03:45 GMT
Reply-To: tjw+@pitt.edu
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Organization: University of Pittsburgh

In article <4v==9s#@engin.umich.edu>, ldoering@engin.umich.edu (Laurence Doering) writes:

> As you all know, William Shatner's brilliant acting skills (unfortunately
> stifled by the limited role he played in "Star Trek") finally achieved
> their full flower in the monumental cop series "T. J. Hooker".  Does
> anybody out there know what the "T. J." stood for?

No, no matter how hard I try, I can't think of a thing!

T.J. WOOD
-- 
        INTERNET: tjw+@pitt.edu         BITNET: TJW@PITTVMS
"Laugh while you can, Monkey Boy!"                        - Lord "John" Warfin
"There can be only one!"                                  - The Highlander
"There should have been only one. I want my money back!"  - Terry
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Mmmm... Purple)
Subject: Re: Tool (Was Re: 2+2 and carrots)
Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 18:14:54 GMT

In article <zlsiida.355@fs1.mcc.ac.uk> zlsiida@fs1.mcc.ac.uk (dave budd) writes:
>In article <1992Nov2.140256.11371@bsu-ucs> 00kjfehn@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>>In article <1992Nov1.072918.25481@netcom.com>, obrien@netcom.com (Robert O'Brien) writes:
>> The only problem
>>>>is when you are wrong, you look like a tool.
>>>>
>>> Oh.  you probably meant "fool", a very simple typo everybody probably
>
>>Tool is the new slang word for dork, geek, nerd, etc....
>
>new????????????  In UK, we STOPPED using 'tool' approx 15 years ago.
>well, i did anyway.
>and it's more sexual than geek etc: it's equiv to 'prick'

I recall it from Shakespeare, so it can be all too new.
-- 
ted frank                     | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu 
also at quibeaux@uchicago.edu | standard disclaimers | void where prohibited
the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
Xref: sparky alt.folklore.urban:28099 soc.culture.african.american:10910 sci.skeptic:19371
From: cromar@math.rutgers.edu (Scott Cromar)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,soc.culture.african.american,sci.skeptic
Subject: Re: 1950's Darryle, damnit.
Date: 11 Nov 92 06:10:25 GMT
Followup-To: alt.folklore.urban
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

dem@engin.umich.edu (Darryle E Merlette) writes:
> danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A Ashlock) 

> >Darryle, AIDS appeared in the fifties....
> >you're repeating yourself like a parrot while ignoring an objection that
> >destroys your whole thesis.  Why?

> Even if AIDS appeared in the 50's (what evidence is there of this?)

Dan already presented the case in a previous posting.  His objection
is that you totally ignored a piece of evidence that destroys your
thesis.  It looks like he was right.

If you really want people to take your dubious conspiracy theory
seriously, you have to seriously answer serious objections.

--Scott
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,alt.religion.kibology
From: kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry)
Subject: Re: Sorry to Inject Some FAQs
Organization: Two rooms filled with typography, in downtown Boston
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 06:12:07 GMT

In article <4760@moscom.com> de@moscom.com (David Esan) writes:
>(can you trust anyone not named Terry? - hell Wease isn't even Kibo rot13ed),

Actually, I am Sy Sperling after he went through a hydraulic rot13 machine.

My name, of course, is Xvob rot13.  In roman numerals, this decomposes
to the equation "15*O(B)", the equation for determining how large the
bozosity of a Magnitude 15 orange is.

							-- K.
From: zlsiida@fs1.mcc.ac.uk (dave budd)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Tool (Was Re: 2+2 and carrots)
Date: 4 Nov 92 13:21:54 GMT
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre

In article <1992Nov2.140256.11371@bsu-ucs> 00kjfehn@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
>In article <1992Nov1.072918.25481@netcom.com>, obrien@netcom.com (Robert O'Brien) writes:
> The only problem
>>>is when you are wrong, you look like a tool.
>>>
>> Oh.  you probably meant "fool", a very simple typo everybody probably

>Tool is the new slang word for dork, geek, nerd, etc....

new????????????  In UK, we STOPPED using 'tool' approx 15 years ago.
well, i did anyway.
and it's more sexual than geek etc: it's equiv to 'prick'






  You don't have to work to be mad here      email: d.budd@mcc.ac.uk
  Dave Budd, MCC, Oxford Rd, Manchester, England   (44|0)61-275-6033  
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: maynard@sarah.msc.cornell.edu (Maynard J. Handley)
Subject: Re: furrfu??
Keywords: Beats The Hell Out Of Me 
Organization: Cornell-Materials-Science-Center
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 06:30:53 GMT

In article <1992Nov4.215431.19946@athena.cs.uga.edu>, jordan@castor
(USENET's Chuck) writes:
>In article <4NOV199210480621@tm0006.lerc.nasa.gov>
>dpm1960@tm0006.lerc.nasa.gov (snopes) writes:
>>>Do you have Rot-13 coding/decoding on your news sytem?
>>
>>Mine only goes up to 12.  
>>
>> - snopes
>
>Well, mine only goes up to 11.  That's one more, innit?

Is that so when other decoders get to 10 and have maxed out, you can still
have an extra 1 of decoding available?
(Apologies to all who are unfortunate enough not to have seen the movie.)

Maynard Handley
From: rperkins@astro.as.arizona.edu (Rachel J. Perkins)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Courgettes (was Re: doggy style)
Date: 5 Nov 92 23:52:00 GMT
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

In article <1992Nov5.203113.4954@igor.tamri.com> donb@igor.tamri.com (Don Baldwin) writes:
>
>I believe this could be true.


this week's motto?

rachel "no, i haven't anything constructive to say, need you ask?" perkins


--
		-just give me what for,
	rachel perkins =  rperkins@astro.as.arizona.edu
      "Chastity..the most unnatural of all the sexual perversions...."
					-Aldous Huxley
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: sasbmt@jjoyce.unx.sas.com (Bruce Tindall)
Subject: Re: Tomorrow's Conspiracy Theory, brought to you today.
Originator: sasbmt@jjoyce.unx.sas.com
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 22:17:54 GMT
Organization: SAS Institute Inc.


In article <1992Nov12.210417.15462@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>, billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:
>There have only been
>one or two presidents who received a majority of the EC votes but not a
>majority of the popular vote.
 ^^^^^^^^

Probably you meant to say "plurality" here.

There have been at least 16 elections in which the winner
got less than 50% of the popular vote.  In 3 of those cases, 
the winner got fewer popular votes than the loser.  

Presidents elected even though their opponents got more
of the popular vote than they did:

1824  J.Q.Adams (30% of popular, 84 electoral votes) 
      versus A.Jackson (45% of popular, 99 electoral votes);
      no candidate got a majority of electoral votes;
      House of Representatives elected Adams.
1876  Rutherford (a.k.a. "Rutherfraud") B. Hayes, 48%,
      versus Samuel Tilden, 51%.  Hayes received a majority
      (by a margin of 1) of the electoral vote after being
      awarded certain disputed states by an "electoral commission"
      appointed by Congress. 
1888  Benjamin Harrison 47.9% versus Grover Cleveland 48.6%.
      Harrison received a majority of the electoral vote.

Presidents who received a plurality but not a majority of the
popular vote; all of these got a majority of the electoral vote.

1844  James K. Polk 49.6%
1848  Zachary Taylor 47.4%
1856  James Buchanan 45.3%
1860  Abraham Lincoln 39.8%
1880  James A. Garfield 48.5%
1884  Grover Cleveland 48.5%
1892  Grover Cleveland 46.1%
1912  Woodrow Wilson 41.9%
1916  Woodrow Wilson 49.4%
1948  Harry Truman 49.6%
1960  John Kennedy 49.7%
1968  Richard Nixon 43.4%
1992  Bill Clinton approx. 43%

In the first few decades of the U.S.'s existence, the concept of
"popular vote" is rather murky, so it's hard to say whether the
elections of, say, 1796 or 1800 also qualify in these categories.

Apropos of this, the "a.f.u media watch" notes that CNN screwed
up the other day when it reported that the presidential electors
would "meet in Washington in December" to cast their votes.  Well,
3 of them (the ones for D.C.) do meet in Washington; the other 535
meet in their respective state capitals.  (Yeah, yeah, the ones
who meet in Olympia meet "in Washington" too.)
-- 
Bruce Tindall, Core Testing Mgr., SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C. 27513
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,soc.culture.african.american,sci.skeptic
From: wbrown@access.digex.com (William Brown)
Subject: Re: AIDS and the CIA (was Question)
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 13:15:57 GMT


In article <1992Nov10.113632@IASTATE.EDU> danwell@IASTATE.EDU (Daniel A
Ashlock) writes: 

>In article <ISBELL.92Nov9074842@panther.ai.mit.edu>, isbell@ai.mit.edu (Charles
>L Isbell) writes:
>
>         [Stupid, oft refuted government-caused-aids rumors]
>
>>>Because the conspiracy theory detailed so far is impossible.  And,
>>>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>unlike a Lewis Carroll character, I don't make it a habit to believe
>>>a certain number of impossible things before breakfast.
>> 
>> Why is it impossible (I'm unaware of the details of the claim, I
>>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> suppose)?  Do you take the view all such conspiracy claims are
>> impossible?  COuld you think of any that are less than impossible?
>
>   Which part of "detailed so far" didn't you understand?  From the last
>time we went through this...
>
>   (1) The government does not now have the technology needed to make the 
>       conspiracy work.
>
>   (2) The governement certianly didn't have the technology in the fifties,
>       the putative timne frame for development.
>
>No version of the conspiracy adresses the issue "how did the government know
>what they had".  Either the government designed the virus (they can't) or 
>they got it by accident (in which case they had no means of knowing what they
>had).  Think about the size of trails needed to tell if a drug wortks right,
>for God sake.
>
>   The conspiracy theories about the origin of Aids as a govenment plot fail at
>every turn BASED ON THE DETAILS OFFERED.  Was that clear enough?
>

    Point of INFORMATION ( :-) )  The technology DID exist in the late
1960's and before to "genetically engineer" viruses.  However, this type
of engineering was "hit-and-miss", as opposed to today's very specific
variety.  To "engineer" a better virus, all you really need is tissue
culture, virus, x-rays, and time.  All of these existed in the time period
in question.  Bear in mid, however, that this is a VERY random and
unpredictable method of viral mutation.  A great deal of molecular biology
is the use of "brute force" were finesse does not yet exist
technologically.  The developments of the late 1970's (polymerase
chain reaction, Southern and Northern blotting, monoclonal
antibody technology, etc.)  added a GREAT DEAL of finess to
the field.  However, it was possible to optimize viruses long
before we had the ability to directly and in a controlled
manner determine which mutations to induce.  Before the
recombinate DNA era we tried to make up for a lack of
specificity with an abundance of screening.  I'm not saying
this was done by the Army, and I'm not saying it wasn't.  I'm just saying
it was possible.


Peace

Bill
From: wilcox@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: "PLEIDIOL WYF I'M GWLAD" on money
Date: 6 Nov 92 19:31:50 GMT
Organization: Oxford University VAX 6620

In article <zlsiida.367@fs1.mcc.ac.uk>, zlsiida@fs1.mcc.ac.uk (Dr Kirsty
McSprotkin) writes:
> 
> [ various UK pound coin motto burbling ]
> 
>>>other one has an oak tree.
>>Don't think so...
> 
> The oak tree one is the DECUS ET TUTAMEN one.  It must be an oak tree, its 
> got acorns on it.  And a royal crown encircling the trunk!
> 
And the other DECUS ET TUTAMEN one has got the royal crest on it, complete with
Lion and Unicorn supporters, the garter (motto: Honi soit qui mal y pense)
round the shield and the royal motto (Dieu et mon droit) underneath. 
-- 

Stephen Wilcox             |   For Sale: Posts in British Government. Suit
wilcox@vax.oxford.ac.uk    |   outgoing American. Highest bids accepted.
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,soc.culture.african.american,sci.skeptic
From: tel@adimail.uucp (Terry Monks)
Subject: Re: AIDS and the CIA (was Question)
Organization: Automata Design, Inc.
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 15:26:44 GMT


William Brown (wbrown@access.digex.com) wrote:
: In article <rKB=qf-@engin.umich.edu> dem@engin.umich.edu (Darryle E Merlette) writes:
: >is genetically engineered (ie. man-made). Among other things, it is
: >not possible for viruses to cross species, so that story about AIDS
: >originating from the African green monkey is even more impossible.
: 
: [stuff deleted]
: 
: >	Darryle
: 
: Point of order, Darryle - It is both possible and common for viruses to
: cross species.  We simply don't pay attention to the zoological equivalent
: of human diseases, even when caused by the same organism.  (unless, of
: course, you are a vet...)
: 
Point of Order, William. That was not a Point of Order, but a Point of
Information.

Terry "Live from Reston (for now)" Monks

-- 
Terry Monks        Automata Design Inc    (703) 742-9400

Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (Joel Furr)
Subject: Re: that lengthy list of successors to the Presidency
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 04:17:07 GMT

In article <1992Nov3.233338.16336@Cadence.COM> vince@cadence.com (Vince Gibboni) writes:
>jfurr@vtssi.vt.edu (Joel Furr) writes:
>>
>> In a nutshell:
>>
>> T. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs is barred by law from attending the State
>> of the Union address to make sure that at least one official on the presiden-
>> tial succession list survives any bombing of the speech and would be available
>> to succeed to the Presidency.
>>
>
>    This must be simply a custom, not a law. If the legislative branch
>    had the power to pass a law restricting the movements of members of 
>    the executive branch, then they could bar the _president_ from attending 
>    the State of the Union Address, or, for that matter from ever leaving 
>    the Rose Garden (okay, admittedly, this may have happened during the 
>    Carter Administration, but that's not the point). The point is that 
>    (as much as it would like to) congress does not have the power to 
>    tell members of the admininstration where they can go.

Congress passes unconstitutional laws all the time.  Unless someone can
show standing and get a court to hear the case, the laws go unchallenged.
Xref: sparky alt.folklore.urban:28311 alt.folklore.computers:16165
From: jtchew@csa3.lbl.gov (Ad absurdum per aspera)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban,alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: Jackpotting ATM's for $$$$
Date: 12 Nov 1992 12:30 PST
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.198
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    

>I heard a MUCH simplier and elegant solution. Find two ATMs set into a wall
>next to each other. Take a forklift (at NIGHT), ram it under the ATMs and lift
>them out. Place on a truck and _scram_...

As usual, American criminals are at least a year ahead of the competition.
In a word (three words, actually):  It's Been Done.

Physical crime is soooo stupid, though.  The occasional large score
notwithstanding, it seems to have become the last refuge of undereducated
toughs who can't make it any other way.  I wouldn't be surprised if right
at this very moment, hundreds of "white-collar criminals" are committing
all manner of big-ticket frauds and embezzlements whose victims can't even
tell that there's something going on, much less finger the perps (assuming
that the bad guy hasn't found some loophole in laws written to address
yesterday's crimes and is in fact unpunishable).  Compared to risking
heavy Federal time and maybe even a gut full of lead from the night 
watchman in return for a four- or five-figure score that has to be divvied
up with several accomplices, it's the only way to rob.

Joe "ATM?  Adenosine trialmagistrate?  I took biology too long ago" Chew
From: harris.minter@ehbbs.gwinnett.com (Harris Minter) 
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: Re: Sorry to Inject Some
Date: 13 Nov 92 05:15:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Ed Hopper's BBS - Berkeley Lake, GA - 404-446-9462
Reply-To: harris.minter@ehbbs.gwinnett.com (Harris Minter) 

>From: twcaps@tennyson.lbl.gov (Terry Chan)

>  +I've heard the tape of the driver's call to 911, with expletives bleeped.
>  +The caller sounded drunk, but sincere.  As a matter or fact, I have it as
>  +a digitized sound file.  It's a big 'un.

>Sounds amusing enough.  Do you have news reports or anything to check
>on?  I'd love to get a copy of a story if only for its entertainment
>value.

>Terry "Is it a *.wav file?" Chan

I know nothing other than what I hear in the sound file.  And it's a
.VOC file.....
                                                                                                                            
----
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|       Ed Hopper's BBS - ehbbs.gwinnett.com - Atlanta, Georgia         |
|  USR/HST: 404-446-9462                  V.32bis: 404-446-9465         |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: vkochend@nyx.cs.du.edu (vance kochenderfer)
Subject: Re: Question about "T." in James T. Kirk !!!!!! (As seen on TV)
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
	of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
	control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Keywords: We don' nee' no stinkeen' keywords!
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 19:42:13 GMT

In article <11NOV199211072089@tm0006.lerc.nasa.gov> dpm1960@tm0006.lerc.nasa.gov (snopes) writes:
>In article <BxGwLn.HEo@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>, 
>  bwbrock@midway.ecn.uoknor.edu (Benjamin Warre Brock) writes...
>
>>Tiberius
>
> Oh.  What does the "V" stand for?
>
  Vance?

Vance "it could be Terry if you squint" Kochenderfer
Virginia Tech                     |   "Trust me, I know what I'm doing"
vkochend@nyx.cs.du.edu            |                     -Sledge Hammer
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban