HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tonyd@lclark.edu (Anthony Davis)
Subject: Re: Rush's E-mail address?
Organization: Lewis & Clark College, Portland OR
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 09:20:35 GMT

In article <1993Jan26.202041.10690@icd.ab.com> kdw@icd.ab.com (Kenneth D. Whitehead) writes:
>Anybody out there got the Big Guy's (Rush Limbaugh that is) e-mail address?  
>Respond via e-mail, please, I'm not a regular on this newsgroup.
>
>Ken Whitehead
>kdw@icd.ab.com

nah... post it on the group... i'm sure that there are...
many people who would... umm... write... um... fan mail...


i'm sure rush needs a little more surreality to brighten his day...
and as many homoerotic lust-laden letters as i can send him.

for the prettiest one,
tonyd

Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.sex,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.correct,alt.politics.equality,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: vengeanc@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu ()
Subject: Re: GayBashing question
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 22:31:17 GMT

grisha@athena.mit.edu (Grigory Golberg) writes:

>In article   <1k1mccINNktr@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>,
> fogarty@sirc.jpl.nasa.gov (Tim Fogarty) writes:

>>.....
>> Going into the wrong part of
>>town is different than minding your own business in your part of town.

>No, sorry, you are wrong. Why is it different? What are you talking about?
>Did we gave up certain parts of our cities to gangs and hoods and
>all agreed that this is the way it should be? I am sorry, but I don't think
>that if a white person gets killed at midnight in Harlem, then it
>was his fault. He is guilty of going there! No, the fault is not on him,
>and the fault is *not* of the society, where politically correct advocates
>of the country's criminals seek the reasons and motives for a crime.
>I may sound strange, but I think that the crime - whether against a 
>gay or straight, black or white, man or woman - is the fault of
>criminals. 

Hmm... don't I remember something about women dressing "seductively" or
"sluttily" NOT being justification for rape?  I guess that a white
guy's presence in an area of town at night would by the same logic
not justify his murder.

So liberals... what's the deal?  If white guys in bad areas are "asking"
for it, are women who are dressed sexily ALSO asking for it?  Or would
you give the conservative answer and say that NEITHER deserve it.  
Careful.. if you agree with me Hillary Clinton will revoke your membership
in "PCers for the Destruction of America".


Edward Simmonds- standard disclaimers  




>-- 
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>| I love the women's movement...| I am pro-choice. I just |
>| especially when I am walking  | hope the choice is for  |
>| behind it.                    | life.                   |
>|                       (Rush Limbaugh)                   |
>===========================================================
>| Grigory Golberg, PI               grisha@athena.mit.edu |
>===========================================================
From: KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Good discussion on another group
Date: 27 Jan 93 12:32:00 GMT
 <93025.200916KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> <nate.1116@psygate.psych.indiana.edu>

In article <nate.1116@psygate.psych.indiana.edu>, nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu
(Nathan Engle) says:

>>Why don't you just cross-post it?  Two good groups that come to mind are
>>alt.rodney-king and alt.rush-limbaugh.  Makes sense to me.

>     Arrrggghhh!

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!! >>:-D

...um, seriously, though.  It -did- sound kind of interesting...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Kurt  E.  Ludwick     | If PRO is the opposite of CON, then
 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -|
 kel111@psuvm.psu.edu  |             what's the opposite of Progress...?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:14631 alt.politics.clinton:20745 alt.politics.bush:16175 alt.politics.homosexuality:9930
From: markc@eomer.hw.stratus.com (Mark Christensen)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: God is intolerant of sin!
Date: 21 Jan 1993 13:05:29 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: eomer.hw.stratus.com

In article <1993Jan20.224409.20515@tc.cornell.edu> shore@dinah.tc.cornell.edu (Melinda Shore) writes:
>In article <1jki0hINNsu7@transfer.stratus.com> markc@eomer.hw.stratus.com (Mark Christensen) writes:
>>All this to just say that homosexual behavior is sin, plain and simple.
>
>And what I am saying is that you (and others) have failed
> ... a bunch of pabulum deleted...
>       Melinda Shore - Cornell Theory Center - shore@tc.cornell.edu

Once again you have missed the point.  You are blinded by your own passions.
Not only that, but I like the way you misrepresent something by selectively
deleting parts of the message you are replying to, leaving just enough
to start your tirade.  I'll have to remember that.
mc

Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: ktoepke@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Kevin M Toepke)
Subject: Re: God is intolerant of sin!
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:11:10 GMT

In article <1jmp5mINNptg@hp-col.col.hp.com> smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith) writes:
>cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black) writes:
>>     I'm sure that's true, but it seems to be the ranting, bible-quoting
>> types who post here more than the tolerant ones (I wonder why that is...).
>
>Mmmmm, maybe the same reason that it seems to be the ranting, flaming 
>homosexuals are the types that post here, rather than the tolerant ones? 

Yes, it is the homosexuals that want to improve how they are viewed by society,
although some may be going about it in the wrong way.

>
>> I, for one, would love to believe that most fundamentalists are tolerant,
>> loving, open-minded people.  The net posters give me absolutely no reason
>> to believe this, though.
>
>And I'd love to believe that most homosexuals are tolerant, loving, open-minded people.
>The net posters give me absolutely no reason  to believe this, though.  Who's more 
>tolerant and open-minded?  Tim Pierce, or Mark Christensen?  Who's more 
>likely to resort to foul language and personal attacks in their posts? 

The oppressed can't be totally tolerant if they want to get rid of the 
oppression.

>
>>     Talk about living in glass houses!  I have never met a proponent of gay
>> rights who did not celebrate diversity.
>
>You mean like the celebration of diversity that we see here from many 
>of the gay posters?  Calling most of the population "homophobes" and bigots, 
>bashing people's religions because they have "sexual morals" that the 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>posters don't like, and think are childish?  Howard, your "celebration 
>ofdiversity" is a joke; anyone who doesn't agree with the PC-way, and 
>who holds sexual morals that go beyond "sex between consenting anyones is 
>ok" is called an idiot and worse.   

They are not bashing religious peoples view of sexuality, just the religious 
people who are trying to force those unwanted views on them.

>
>> I have, however, been exposed to
>> many religious types who, in effect, say that if you're not like them in
>> values, lifestyle, etc., then there's something wrong.
>
>Sounds REAL familiar, Howard...
>
>Walter
>
Kevin
--
Not a Christian. Not a homosexual. But supportive of individuals in either 
"group" that can understand (but maybe not agree with) other peoples views.

Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:14767 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:13404
From: pbowden@missing.kludge.com (Pete Bowden)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Still missing the Promises???
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 93 20:51:13 PST
Organization: The Missing Link BBS, Santa Maria, CA  805-925-1129

The requests keep coming in to my system here from people who have yet
to receive one or both portions.  If you are STILL missing a portion of
it... here are your choices:
        1)  Email me again letting me know which part(s) you are missing
                and I'll attempt yet another re-send to you.
        2)  Email me again and ask me to SPLIT either or both of the
                two parts and we'll try to send those.
        3)  Call my BBS and download it:  Call (805) 925-1129, use login
                name 'promises' (no password required) and set the
                'p'rotocol to X, Y-batch, or Z, and have my system
                's'end you the desired file.

If none of the above are working out then let me know and we'll try to
work something else out.

Pete Bowden, P.O. Box 805, Avila Beach, CA  93424-0805

--
pete@missing.kludge.com (Pete Bowden)  {SYStem OPerator}
The Missing Link BBS, (805) 925-1129
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: gonzalez@athena.mit.edu (John R Gonzalez)
Subject: Rush and the Gulf War
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 13:55:25 GMT


Rush on the Gulf War

I didn't start listening to Rush after the Gulf war.
I was curious, what was his stance on our inter-
vention before we sent troops to the Persian Gulf. 
 Most conservatives were against going there(true 
conservatives that is).  Did Rush first oppose our 
going and then support our troops or what?


				John R. Gonzalez
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: aa363@yfn.ysu.edu (Jacob Huebert)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Oh my!!
Date: 26 Jan 93 23:15:25 GMT
Reply-To: aa363@yfn.ysu.edu (Jacob Huebert)
Organization: St. Elizabeth Hospital, Youngstown, OH


	I cant believe ther aren't any messages in a sub with such a great
premise!!  
	There's got to be more Rush-lovers than this in the computing
world!!

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------  Jacob Huebert
----------------------------------------------------------aa363@yfn.ysu.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: root@june.cmp.rpi.edu (J.R. Ordon)
Subject: Sen. Barbara Streisand???
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 17:21:25 GMT

Just heard this over the radio...

It is reported that Barbara Streisand is considering a run for the
U.S. Senate from New York State. She would enter the Democratic
primary against incumbent Daniel P. Moynihan.

I'm no big fan of Moynihan, but if she does try to run I'd consider
changing my party affiliation to vote against her in the primary.

NYS is screwed up enough without having to put up with Sen. Streisand.

-----------------------------------------------------
J.R. Ordon

"Don't blame me, I voted for Bush!"
From: rwn@po.CWRU.Edu (Richard W. Nelson Jr)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: SLICK TIMES
Date: 21 Jan 1993 20:25:42 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc12.ins.cwru.edu


     A new publication out of California called the "SLICK TIMES"
will satirize and otherwise have great fun with Bill Clinton,
Hillary and their administration. It is in a 12 pg. format, and
comes out 4 times a year. For more information or to subscribe,
call 1-800-93-SLICK.
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
Subject: Re: God is intolerant of sin!
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:17:41 GMT
Organization: Eastern Illinois University

In article <1jmp5mINNptg@hp-col.col.hp.com> smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith) writes:
>
>Mmmmm, maybe the same reason that it seems to be the ranting, flaming 
>homosexuals are the types that post here, rather than the tolerant ones? 

    IMHO, there is a cross-section of gay types who post here.  I, for one,
don't care if you or anyone don't like gays.  Just give us our civil
rights, equal in all ways to your own, and I'll be happy.

>And I'd love to believe that most homosexuals are tolerant, loving, open-minded people.
>The net posters give me absolutely no reason  to believe this, though.  Who's more 
>tolerant and open-minded?  Tim Pierce, or Mark Christensen?  Who's more 
>likely to resort to foul language and personal attacks in their posts? 

    This requires a judgement call, about which we would probably differ.
No thanks.

>You mean like the celebration of diversity that we see here from many 
>of the gay posters?  Calling most of the population "homophobes" and bigots, 
>bashing people's religions because they have "sexual morals" that the 
>posters don't like, and think are childish?  Howard, your "celebration 
>of diversity" is a joke; anyone who doesn't agree with the PC-way, and 
>who holds sexual morals that go beyond "sex between consenting anyones is 
>ok" is called an idiot and worse.   

    Personally, I have no quarrel with anyone's religion.  The
practitioners, however, are another story.  To reiterate, I don't care what
your morals are, and I don't think less of someone for whom heterosexual
monogamy is a goal.  I don't even care if you judge my morals to be
deficient, according to some gut feeling and/or an old book.  But don't use
these feelings to justify depriving me of the same basic rights you take
for granted.

>> I have, however, been exposed to
>> many religious types who, in effect, say that if you're not like them in
>> values, lifestyle, etc., then there's something wrong.
>
>Sounds REAL familiar, Howard...

    It should, Walter.  It's you.
-- 
   ******************************************************************
     Howard Black                             cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
     Department of Chemistry                  Eastern Illinois Univ. 
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: hooker@aristotle.ils.nwu.edu (BOB HOOKER)
Subject: Re: Another alt. group for summaries
Organization: ILS
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 16:38:24 GMT

In article <1jkrccINNf6m@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>, tcanham@kilroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov
(Tim Canham) writes:
> 
> Awhile ago, someone brought up the possibility of starting another alt. group
> for the summaries.  Does anyone know how to do this?
> 
> The noise on this group is deafening.
> 

Go right ahead,  waste even more of the tax payers money to promote the
career of a radio talk show star.  Why not jsut give the guy a Grant or
something.

Tax Payers should revolt.
> 
> -- 
> Tim Canham
> tcanham@kilroy.jpl.nasa.gov
> Jet Propulsion Laboratories, Pasadena, CA
> "Everybody always told me I was a rocket scientist!"
> 
> 
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.president.clinton
From: john@anasazi.com (John R. Moore)
Subject: Re: Rush and the Gulf War
Organization: Anasazi Inc, Phoenix AZ USA
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 22:36:53 GMT

gonzalez@athena.mit.edu (John R Gonzalez) writes:


]Rush on the Gulf War

]I didn't start listening to Rush after the Gulf war.
]I was curious, what was his stance on our inter-
]vention before we sent troops to the Persian Gulf. 
] Most conservatives were against going there(true 
]conservatives that is).  
I disagree that most "true conservatives" were against going there.
Pat Buchanan was.... who else?
-- 
John Moore NJ7E, 7525 Clearwater Pkwy, Scottsdale, AZ 85253  (602-951-9326)
john@anasazi.com ncar!noao!asuvax!anasaz!john anasaz!john@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
 - - Comment too controversial for management - Deleted :-) -
 - - Support ALL of the bill of rights, INCLUDING the 2nd amendment! - -
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.sex,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.correct,alt.politics.equality,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: john@anasazi.com (John R. Moore)
Subject: Re: More Real World Stories
Organization: Anasazi Inc, Phoenix AZ USA
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 19:35:12 GMT

drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:

]twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:
]] In article <C0v6y6.9vv@news.cso.uiuc.edu> vengeanc@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu () writes:
]] 
]] >The reason he was killed has very little to do with it.
]] 
]] Oh, bull-fucking-shit.  Live in the real world for a millisecond or
]] two before spewing crap like this.

]Once Upon a Time I got in the face of what I thought
]was a complete ASSHOLE, as he was apparently running
]a 'corpral klinger' - pretending to be NonHet to
]get out of the Navy.

]What it turned out to be was a Case that he had finally
]come to understand himself, and had to come out of the
]closet, but could NOT do so safely! 

]He had to play a straightboy playing a faggot, to 
]get out of the Navy, so as NOT to get himself KILLED
]by some Homophobe.....

Drieux, why is it so hard to play a straightboy? He had BEEN a straightboy
right up until he "came to understand himself." Why didn't he just continue
the way he was? I am genuinely curious.... he could have engaged in
homosexual BEHAVIOR off base/ship when away from others... what other
characteristics did he have to hide or pretend?

]It is a Shame that there are people out there still
]willing to KILL PEOPLE over Sexual Preference.
Yes, it is. It is pretty stupid. Unfortunately it is also reality.
-- 
John Moore NJ7E, 7525 Clearwater Pkwy, Scottsdale, AZ 85253  (602-951-9326)
john@anasazi.com ncar!noao!asuvax!anasaz!john anasaz!john@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
 - - Support ALL of the bill of rights, INCLUDING the 2nd amendment! - -
 - - - "It is better to be judged by twelve, than carried by six." - - -
Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:14872 alt.sex:42873 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:13516
From: jhb@calmasd.prime.com (Jim Bishop)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.sex,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Colorado Amendment2 Query
Date: 22 Jan 93 01:59:11 GMT
Followup-To: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.sex,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization: -

In article <Treble-190193120015@asc438.asc.slb.com>, 
Treble@asc.slb.com (John Treble) writes:
> 
> Does anyone else find it intriguing that one could become a minority by
> behaving a certain way?  

You've worded this incorrectly.  You should have said; "Does anyone
else find it intriguing that one could be discriminated against for
being perceived to behave as certain way?"

Also, how do you feel about protection for religion?  It is a behavior.

> If I, a white man, stand in the midst of my black
> friends, it isn't difficult to discern that I am not black. However, if I
> stand among my white friends, some of whom are gay, it becomes difficult to
> discern.

A straight 17 year old youth was beaten to death several years ago in
San Diego.  His attackers thought he was gay simply because of the
part of town he was in.


> Behavior-based privileges?  

Specifically what privileges are what behaviors are you talking about.
Homosexuality is an sexual orientation.  Sexual orientation describes
who a person is sexual attracted to.  Sexual attraction does not
describe the behaviors of a person.

> Is this not dangerous territory?  

Why is it any more "dangerous" that protection based on religion or
marital status?

> Where does the defining line fall?  If a homosexual decides to 
> abandon the gay lifestyle, 

Please define gay lifestyle.  

> then does that person become an nonminority. 

Laws protecting sexual orientation are about providing legal recourse
when discrimination occurs as a result of a persons perceived sexual
orientation.  The laws protects everyone regardless whether they are
heterosexual or homosexual.  There is no requirement that you are in
any one group (minority or majority).

Jim
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
From: gonzalez@athena.mit.edu (John R Gonzalez)
Subject: Re:  Rush and the Gulf WAr
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:05:59 GMT


Mr. Unger:

Sorry about that (you over sensitive loser), as you can
tell from the first sentence I typed in that post, I was
rushed.  I meant die-hard conservatives, i.e. ultra-
conservatives.  The vast majority of them that I know, or
have heard on talk radio were dead set against our 
involvment in the Gulf.  As a matter of fact you, Scott,
are the first conservative I've had a dialogue with who 
was for the war.  I was generalizing so that I wouldn't 
have to post a one paragraph description of some side 
issue that no one gives a rat's ass about.

My whole point was, many of the liberals on this news-
group were bashing Rush for be pro-war.  I heard that 
talentless nobody, Al Franken, on CrossFire complaining
that Rush was a...what do we call them...chickenhawk I 
believe.  

Since most conservatives were against going to the Gulf,
I was trying to establish whether or not Rush supported
our going from the beginning.  If he did not support our
going or had reservations, but then threw support behind
our troops, he was not a hypocrite, and the people that 
were saying that he was were morons.  If he did whole-
heartedly going in with guns blazing, they were correct
in categorizing him as being hypocritical.  

But as you and I (you by your anger and I by my infantile
calling of names, i.e. loser) have now demonstrated how 
we conservatives tend to resort to cannibalism now and 
then when we are angry at one another.  A cannibalism 
that is present in the Republican party now as Ultra-
rightists and moderates are trying to take control of
the party.

Anyways, I digress, was Rush pro-war, or did he have 
reservations, or did he oppose the war?

			John R. Gonzalez
From: root@june.cmp.rpi.edu (J.R. Ordon)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Re: Hillary's Role in the White House
Date: 27 Jan 93 20:39:01 GMT
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY

In article <105120061@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM> patm@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Pat Murphy) writes:
> (Paul S Galvanek) writes:
>> 
>> The appointment of Hillary to head up anything, regardless of her 
>> qualifications, views of the degree of power is just one more of what is
>> fast becoming a - growing larger by the day list - of lies, broken promises
>> and outright deception that Bill Clinton used to get elected.  
>
>	so??!!   name one president/senator/congressman who did
>	NOT lie/break promises/deceive to get elected.  why should
>	you be surprised that slick willie has done and is doing
>	the same thing??  all this *list of broken promises* is
>	proffered by rush for entertainment purposes.  you ought
>	to star thinking for yourself and stop living in a
>	vaccuum...  [not meant as a flame]  do you really believe
>	there is such an animal as an *honest politician*??!
>
>
>oh to be young and ignorant again,
>pjm.

True enough, Politicians do this all the time. BUT, I thought we were going to
get CHANGE, at least that is what the voters were led to believe.

No more broken promises, no special interests etc. Sounds like the same old
game to me....

I guess now you know how it feels to be defending "the man in charge", get used
to it!!!!!

Change?? Well maybe in '96!

-------------------------------------------------
J.R. Ordon

Don't blame me, I voted for Bush!
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
From: tonyd@lclark.edu (Anthony Davis)
Subject: Re: Colorado Amendment2 Query
Organization: Lewis & Clark College, Portland OR
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:05:19 GMT

it really is interesting how straight folks seem to fit in with the rest
of normal society...

you really can't tell just by looking at them.

see ya,
tonyd

Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh