HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ij59@vaxb.acs.unt.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Data speaks French in TA I
Date: 1 Oct 92 03:18:09 GMT
Organization: University of North Texas

In article <4155@vidiot.UUCP>, brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes:
> In article <1992Sep21.230011.9797@cs.wisc.edu> steve@picard.cs.wisc.edu (Steven Glinberg) writes:
> [...] yes I did take apostrophe 101, I dont like using them! 
> 
> Not liking to use the ' is no reason not to use it.  We do like to read things
> as English, not as Steve English.

Well, THPBBBBT!!!  I generally use correct punctuation and spelling, but

i dont really consider it a very hi priority on th' vax.  as long as u can
tell what Im saying, it is often convenient to simplify things

(Especially when I'm using a crummy on-line editor.)

So take it easy.

 ________    _______              _         ________     ____
|______  |  |_____  |            | |       |________|   |____|
      / /         | |  _  _   _  |  \       ________    ______   _______
     /  \         | | |_||_| / / |   \     |________|  |____  | |_______|
    / /\ \   _____| |   ____/ /  | |\ \     ________       / /
   /_/  \_\ |_______|  |_____/   |_| \/    |________|     /_/
 
        |  Nippon no anime wa ichi-ban desu!  Otaku rule!    |
        |      Hey, man, I _like_ Robotech.  So sue me.      |
        | Sukotto Miraa/Scott Miller (ij59@vaxb.acs.unt.edu) |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder)
Subject: Re: The Enemy Within
Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 17:39:50 GMT

In article <1992Sep28.130715.28138@gserv1.dl.ac.uk> atb@gserv1.dl.ac.uk writes:


[synopsis of Enemy Within deleted...]

>help him out. Meanwhile Sulu and some unknown crewmen are stuck down on a planet
>where the temperature is dropping rapidly to -120 degrees (brr), they can't beam them
>up until Scotty fixes the transporter to stop production of good/bad duplicates.
>The bad kirk tries to take over but eventually the good kirk takes the bad kirk to
>the transporter room (now fixed) and spock beams the two out and beams one kirk
>back. This kirk is "back to normal" and he makes the decision to beam sulu and co
>A fairly good episode, one things always puzzled me. If the transporter was broken
>why didn't they send down a shuttlecraft to pick up Sulu and co? 


A local station just started showing TOS at 10:00 pm weeknights, and
apparently the "Trek Trivia Question" is going to be a regular feature
during the reruns.  I was pleasantly surprised by the complexity of the
question that they gave last night.  I was expecting something
relatively simple like "What was Kirk's middle name".  However, last
night's question was "in the episode The Enemy Within, what do we see
Sulu's phaser do that we never see a phaser do at any other time?"  I
have to admit that it completely stumped me.  Let's see if anyone else
out there knows the answer.  Post or e-mail guesses and I'll tell you if
you're right (this is assuming that you have nothing better to do with
your time...).


Oh, why didn't they send an s-craft to pick up Sulu?
This episode was one of the very first, and was written before anyone on
the show's staff had come up with the idea for the shuttlecraft. 



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Schroeder  		|  
schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov         |             Boo. 
Brookhaven National Laboratory  |
From: sabat@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: What did Picard say?
Date: 6 Oct 92 17:24:01 EST

Does anyone know what Picard says at the end of the episode (I think "The
Enemy") where Geordie and a Romulan are stranded on a planet and learn to
help each other barely making it back to the Enterprise at the end when the
big E and a Romulan warbird are about to blast each other.  It is something
like "______manship is a dangerous game."  We have rewatched it several times
and cannot figure it out.  Thanks

Ted			Sabat@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current,rec.arts.startrek.misc
From: ras@kepler.unh.edu (Robert A Seace)
Subject: The Great Split (was Re: Suffering Review Burn-out?)
Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek.misc
Organization: University of New Hampshire  -  Durham, NH
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 13:04:59 GMT

	Followups to r.a.s.misc...

In article <rawdon.717625936@cs.wisc.edu> rawdon@colby.cs.wisc.edu writes:

[Much deleted...]

>(As you can see, this is a sore spot with me.  I still regard the r.a.s
>split to be an unmitigated disaster.)

	Well, as one of the major opponents of the split at the time,
I must say that it has gone much better than I expected.  However, I do
often see articles which appear out of place in one of the subgroups, yet
it continues there (a good example is the "STAR TREK PRANKS" thread in
r.a.s.current; what the hell is "current" about it??).  So, the confusion
and misposting and crossposting that I predicted is indeed occurring, but
to a much lesser extent than I predicted...  All in all, I'd still rather
have good old r.a.s back... ;-) 

||======================================================================||
||  Robert A. Seace  ||  Senior at UNH  ||  E-mail: ras@kepler.unh.edu  ||
||   AKA: Agrajag    ||    CS major     ||                              ||
||======================================================================||
"May I interest you in parts of my body?" - TRATEOTU
From: rhaar@albert.cs.gmr.com (Bob Haar)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: FTP Site: ftp.coe.montana.edu
Date: 30 Sep 92 15:09:38 GMT
Reply-To: rhaar@albert.cs.gmr.com
Organization: G.M. Research Labs

In article 66887@cup.portal.com, Renee@cup.portal.com (Renee Linda Roberts) writes:
|>I just logged onto vab02.larc.nasa.gov, and noticed that the STARTREK
|>archives are now at ftp.coe.montana.edu. Ok, fine. But they limit the number
|>of anonymous users to 1! I have tried all night long, and there has not been
|>a time where I could log on.
|>

I have had the same experience. Also requests setn via ftpmail
have failed because anonymous login was denied access.


---
	Robert Haar               InterNet : rhaar@gmr.com 
	Computer Science Dept., G.M. Research Laboratories
DISCLAIMER: Unless indicated otherwise, everything in this note is
personal opinion, not an official statement of General Motors Corp.


Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu (Jeffrey S. Jo)
Subject: Re: ST: TNG movie ???
Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha
Distribution: rec.arts.startrek.current
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 22:19:05 GMT

cs304001@scs.carleton.ca (Chulaka Ailapperuma) writes:

>Does anyone think that someone will make a ST:TNG motion picture ?

Well, rumor has it that Patrick Stewart will not be around for the 7th
season because he signed up for a stage production.  His character, Captain
Jean-Luc Picard, will be promoted to Admiral and will make various guest
appearances.  Commander Riker will be Captain of the glorious Starship
Enterprise.  About movies...that's the plan after the show is finshed
it's last season, but riker will still be in command.  No time line for
the movies though.  I guess it all depends on how the show ends ratings
wise.  I have a feeling they will fall after Picard leaves...no offense
to Jonathen Frakes or his character.


--
|Jeffrey S. Jo                   |	         F-14D Tomcat                 |
|Computer Operations		 |             VF-142 Ghostriders             |
|University of Nebraska at Omaha |       United States Navy F-14 Tomcat       |
|tomcat@cwis.unomaha.edu         |              Fighter Squadron              |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: CXMP000 <CXMP@MUSICA.MCGILL.CA>
Subject: Re: O'Brien's Rank [THE FINAL ANSWER]
Organization: McGill University
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 01:51:43 GMT

>Whatever the case, Miles Edward O'Brien *VERY* clearly wore the rank of
>LIEUTENANT from the second thru fifth seasons, and performed actions and
>duties commensurate with such a rank.  We wore the RANK so he MUST be a LT.
>Impersonating an officer is a *very* serious offense.  The ramblings of
>ONE blatantly very silly character do not even remotely compare to that.

Add to this the fact that in "Hollow Pursuits" it was mentioned that
Barclay had been transferred to the Enterprise which means that the
Enterprise wasn't his first assignment so Barclay might have had
seniority over O'Brien without actually outranking him.

I suppose the real answer is this: the Producers *intended* O'Brien to
be a CPO but they care no more about his rank than the question of why
a thousand stardates can pass each season.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                ! Address as above or use
Martin Phipps                   ! LOULA@hep.physics.mcgill.ca or simply
                                ! MUHEP::LOULA if you're on a VAX
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terminal freeze, duplicate posts, lost posts and email-come-posts,
these are a few of my least favorite things.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: rhballan@eos.ncsu.edu (ROBERT HAMI BALLANTINE)
Subject: Re: Time's Arrow Part II
Originator: rhballan@c00577-1403br.eos.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: rhballan@eos.ncsu.edu (ROBERT HAMI BALLANTINE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 16:50:29 GMT


In article <Bv60s8.62z@spock.dis.cccd.edu>, markb@spock.dis.cccd.edu (Julie Bixby) writes:
|> >We still have a few loose ends to bicker about in r.a.s.c, though,
|> >like why Data's head seems to be okay, even though Data said
|> >it had degraded.  How Picard knew where to tap on Data's head to get
|> >a message to the future.  How they can let Twain go back to the past 
|> >with info on the future (they wiped other peoples' minds in past
|> >episodes).
|> >
|> *Real* inquiring minds want to know why Troi was the only one to get
|> a tan from traveling through time :-). 
|> 
|> -- 
|> Julie Bixby                        Internet: markb@spock.dis.cccd.edu
|> Engage Romulan .sig cloaking device....
|> 

And where did they get those clothes???????



Rob
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Subject: tng music (was re: po
Reply-To: "bernie wong" <bernie.wong@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: rec
Date: 28 Sep 92 20:39:43 EST

>On the subject of TNG music, since this thread began with a complaint
>about "Inner Light" winning the reader poll for best music..

Most probably because it was so recent.  About the only piece of music
in that episode was Picard's flute playing, which was of course good,
but that was about it.

>Several people said that they preferred the music for BOBW I & II. Now,
>I liked that music a lot -- and I found it amazing that when I read
>cinemafantastique's ST issue, they fired Ron Jones for doing the kind of
>stuff that he pulled in BOBW -- using synthesizers, specific themes,
>orchestra hits, etc.

>Horror of horrors, that TNG music could be noticable! (Then again, was
>I the only one to be shocked that TNG won a dramatic underscore emmy?
>Ludicrous!)

Here here!  Absolutely agreed!  I say bring Jones back and bring the
life back into TNG.

>Anyway, I can't figure why "Inner Light" would win such a poll. Granted,
>it's a wonderful episode, but if you like the flute sounds, etc., then
>"Tin Man" does what "Inner Light" does in spades. And "BOBW" is a pretty
>fun score, too -- the CD is great. I'd kill for a "Tin Man" CD....

I'd kill for a "Tin Man" CD WITH the "Inner Light" flute playing AND the
Sarek death scene from "Unification".  (If they make a "Unification" CD,
ya think they'll include "Melor & Fumigal"?  :-) )

(Or was et Mlota?)


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jason Wong
Calling from Markham, Ontario CANADA.  It's not cold though!  :-)
INTERNET: bernie.wong@canrem.com


 * OLX 2.1 TD * He wants you to join the Brotherhood of Aliens.  Martia
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: trw@spl1.spl.loral.com (Tim R Witort)
Subject: Re: Picard/Riker
Organization: Loral Software Productivity Laboratory
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 00:18:49 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.204823.5271@ra.msstate.edu>, cea1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Carolyn E. Adams-Price) writes:
|>  With regard to Picard/Riker, the Ferengi, or even Wesley,
|> let's think about fun combinations from TOS or TNG that we'd
|> rather see for president than Bush/Quayle or (heaven forbid)
|> Quayle/Somebody else.

   You forgot the scariest combination of all: Clinton/Gore!

-- Tim
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: kgatling@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Keith E Gatling)
Subject: Re: Will we have to pay to see Star Trek?
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 92 11:29:54 EDT

Okay, a couple of points here.

First the big one...I MAY BE WRONG ABOUT EVERYTHING I SAY.

Now that we've settled that, let's proceed to the others.

As far as having to get cable in order to watch ST sometime in the future
goes, we had to get cable in order to watch it and it was on a local
broadcast channel.  The problem was that it was a UHF channel that had very
bad reception on our side of town, and it was barely worth watching and
definitely not worth taping with that kind of reception.  The only reason I
was able to talk my wife into getting cable was so that we could see ST
clearly.  Now I'll admit, we didn't take the bare bones, only your local
stations, package; but we didn't go for the total premium one either (you
know, Disney, HBO, Showtime, Cinemax, ad nauseum); we took the middle
one...the one that gives you things like Nickelodeon, A&E, Discovery, etc.
As a result, the idea of MTM being only on Nick doesn't strike me as
terrible because it's one of those channels I get as part of the package
deal, and it's not one I *specifically* (and the key word here is
*specifically*) have to pay extra for.  Is the Sci-Fi channel going to be
one of those that you pay for specifically or one that like Nick, A&E, and
TNN, just gets thrown in as a package deal?  This could be the difference.

Now on the subject of blackouts, I may be wrong, but I don't think that the
situation is as complicated as it's been made out to be.  There've been any
number of shows scheduled to be shown by a Superstation over our cable
system, that had to be blacked out because a local station had the rights.
Who did the blacking out?  The local cable operator.  If you had a satellite
dish in your backyard, you'd get to see the show just fine, but if you tried
to watch it over the cable service, you'd see a screen explaining how due to
FCC rule number 3.14159 the local cable operator had to black it out.

Now I really hate to say this, but what really makes us think that we have
the right to see shows we like for free?  Just because that's the way it's
been done before?  This wouldn't be as big a problem if we were talking
about some brand new series that had never been aired over broadcast
channels before, but for some reason, when you start talking about shows
that are still in production, people get upset.  And frankly, years ago I
thought it would be a great idea if someone out there in cable land put
together a service that just showed old reruns.

Now...one big question about the Sci-Fi Channel...are they also going to air
some of the old Gerry and Sylvia Anderson puppet shows like "Supercar,"
"Fireball XL5," "Captain Scarlet," and "The Thunderbirds"?  If so, then
maybe I'll sign on.  Where do I get more info?
From: dbazley@milton.u.washington.edu (Dona Bazley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: Synopsis, "Time's Arrow, Part II"
Date: 29 Sep 92 15:42:18 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Sep29.154218.12706
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

Jim I tried to get this to you through the e-mail address that  you gave
but it came back.  Could you put this in the newsgroup.

thanks dona
 From
MAILER-DAEMON@milton.u.washington.edu 
Ukn Sep 25 15:00:46 1992 Received: by milton.u.washington.edu
	(5.65/UW-NDC Revision: 2.22 ) id AA24007; Fri, 25 Sep 92 15:00:29 -0700
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 92 15:00:29 -0700
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@milton.u.washington.edu>
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Message-Id: <9209252200.AA24007@milton.u.washington.edu>
To: dbazley
Status: RO
X-Status: 

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>>> RCPT To:<trek-info@xcf.Berkeley.EDU>
<<< 550 <trek-info@xcf.Berkeley.EDU>... User unknown
550 trek-info@scam.berkeley.edu... User unknown: Inappropriate ioctl for device

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by milton.u.washington.edu
	(5.65/UW-NDC Revision: 2.22 ) id AA23985; Fri, 25 Sep 92 15:00:29 -0700
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 14:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dona Bazley <dbazley@u.washington.edu>
Subject: snow globe - enterprise
To: trek-info@xcf.Berkeley.EDU
Message-Id: <Pine.3.05.9209251441.A18518-9100000@milton.u.washington.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii

The glitter dome is made by Willitts which is a branch of Hallmark.

Sandy's Hallmark in Montlake Terrace will be carrying them.  They are
already on order.  If you want to be put on the list to get one call Cindy
at 206 - 775-6965 and order it.  Only twelve can be ordered by any one
Hallmark store.  Tell her Dona sent ya.  This is in the Seattle area.

And that's the truth.....
Dona
dbazley@u.washington.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: tallman%ailanth.uucp@wang.com (Robert Oliver)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: My beef with TIME'S ARROW II **SPOILERS**
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 92 20:27:39 EDT
Reply-To: tallman%ailanth.uucp@wang.com (Robert Oliver)
Organization: Ailanthus Project

ung@felix.filenet.com (Bill Ung) writes:

> In article <1992Sep24.012436.14495@news.Hawaii.Edu> bill@gaza.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu
> |In article <1992Sep22.061422.11145@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> dave@cs.arizon
> ||SPOILERS for TIME'S ARROW II follow!
> 
> Adding a ^L...
> 
> 
> 
> ||
> ||One other thing that really stands out -- there are lots of contrivances
> ||What is Data building?  How will Twain react
> ||to his knowledge of Data and Guinan's origins?
> |	What ever Data built it had no use, or else it fell 
> |	on the cutting room floor.
> 
> No, Data DID use it.  He said something to Twain about it being a time-
> shift detector ... for the horseless carriage.  I think part 1 is correct.
> Data was using the machine to monitor things in the 19th century, and the
> machine started going wild about the time the two aliens vanished from
> the hospital, presumably back to the 24th century.  At that point, Data
> got up real quick and headed straight for that hospital where he met up
> with the rest of the gang.  Now, my only problem with all this is, Data
> left this contraption behind, in his room.  Someone is sure to find it
> and what will they think of it then?
> 
> Bill Ung
>   ung@filenet.com

They won't have a clue as to what it is.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: kanamori@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Atsushi Kanamori)
Subject: Re: S.O.S.:  What is it?
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1992 03:14:50 GMT

In article <1992Oct6.024133.25026@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> jreiss@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Joseph W Reiss) writes:
>
>Since many people seem to have a certain amount of confusion about
>just what exactly my weekly S.O.S. posting is, I'd thought I'd try to
>shed a little light on the subject.
>
>S.O.S. stands for Spoiler-Free Opinion Summary.  It is my hope that
>eventually, a large number of the people on the net who get to see the
>episodes early in the week and proceed to critique them will send me a
>short e-mail telling me what their RATING is (not a review -- I don't
>want to be spoiled either :-)
>
>Then each week, most likely on Thursday, I make a posting to
>
>Anyway, the S.O.S. has gotten off to a slow start.  It seems that
>everybody sends me their rankings AFTER I make the S.O.S. post.  

Most people don't see new episodes until at least Wednesday. Some
stations show it on Mondays or Tuesdays, but they're the vast minority 
(or so it seems).

>So, I
>guess I'm going to have to try to make a posting at the beginning of
>each week (probably Sun. night) asking for opinions.  This might get
>annoying and might end up in many kill files, but I can't see a better
>solution off hand.  I'll keep the subject line fairly consistent
>(something like "S.O.S.:  Call for opinions").  That way people will
>be able to kill the call without missing the actual summary.

I usually decide on my rating and write my review Thursday morning.
If it weren't for this "1=F, 6=D" scaling of yours (which I still find
bizarre), I guess I could give you standing permission to grep my
review for the overall rating and include it in your S.O.S. 

However my review of "Man of the People" may be delayed until 
Sunday (and this may not be a rare occurrence from now on).
From: labrg@emory.edu (Ryan Montieth Gill)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
Subject: Re: Eating within the Holodeck
Date: 5 Oct 92 16:14:51 GMT
Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3

swindley@elec.uq.oz.au (Robert Swindley) writes:
:    Now if a member of the crew was to _live_ on the
: holodeck for an extended period, eating the food 
: created by the holodeck, would the holodeck 
: projection system claim back it's molecules???
: 
: chengster

	Well I think that Riker would have Warf sent down with a fire hose
or the 25 cen equivalent to wake the person in question up for
duty...

Ryan Montieth Gill
labrg@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu
Academic Computing
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
From: jfriday@westmark.Stanford.EDU (The Crazy Archivist)
Subject: Re: Computer / Saucer Separation
Organization: Stanford University
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 92 02:04:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.193207.5736@wdl.loral.com> trw@spl1.spl.loral.com (Tim R Witort) writes:
>In article <1992Oct02.030917.12520@watson.ibm.com>, rrogers@watson.ibm.com (Ryan Rogers) writes:
>|> In  <1992Oct1.191928.1@vaxb.acs.unt.edu>  ij59@vaxb.acs.unt.edu writes:
>
>   Isn't that the BATTLE section (not engineering)? That's what I recall
>it being named in the Tech Manual.
>
>-- Tim


The names are interchangable.  Even in the episodes both names have
been used.




Paul "Joe Friday" Stacy (not net.police)       Buffalo State College, New York
STACY54@SNYBUFVA.BITNET (Buffalo State College VAX)                JUST THE
jfriday@westmark.stanford.edu (Stanford, California UNIX)       "VAX", MA'AM!
Disclaimer:  This isn't the opinion of the school, police, Chief of Detective
             Staff Brown, Planet Spaceball, Starfleet Command, or the Pentagon.


Organization: Freshman, MCS general, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech
Date: Sun,  4 Oct 1992 21:44:46 -0400 
From: Michael Joseph Harris <mh6g+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Unanswered STNG question

answering Phil.Hodges question of whether crew members are paid, Dick
Grady answered " of course."

Remember the episode when the Enterprise discovers the cryonic ship,
when one of the healed persons asked a question about pay. The answer
was that greed had been eliminated, everyone worked equally, and
therefore, they aren't paid

                                                Michael
From: mort@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Jeff Mortensen)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 11:28:28 GMT
Subject: Re: The Bathrooms in the Enterprise (Re: Unanswered S
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech

In rec.arts.startrek.tech, judson@watnxt2.ucr.edu (Michael Judson) writes:

> > 
> > 	Why do they have to have bathrooms? Can't they just beam the shit out?
> 
	Oh come now!  The answer to this question is simple.  They do beam the
	shit out only its when you sleep.  So while you snooze, they take out
	the ooze.  Its turned into energy, then re-arranged into the next   
	morning coffee or eggs.  Waste not in the future young men!!!
Morty> 
> --
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.tech