HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin)
Subject: Re: Continuity catalog part two
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 15:13:35 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.035049.12857@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes:
>In article <01GOPP8XUW1E8WW3HM@kinni.acc.uwrf.edu> steven.k.manfred@UWRF.EDU writes:
>
>You missed a whopper, which I'd suggest adding to your list: The Doctor
>has to leave behind Sarah before Deadly Assassin because he can't take
>aliens to Gallifrey.  In Invasion of Time he takes Leela to Gallifrey.

Yep.  Forgot this one.

>
>The best explanation I've seen is that since the Doctor was trying to
>act irrational in Invasion of Time, taking Leela there would just fit
>in.  Unfortunately, this doesn't quite work; the Gallifreyans do not
>react to Leela's presence as if it violated as big a rule as Deadly
>Assassin implied.  (Actually, I don't remember any adverse reactions
>at all, but it's been a while since I've seen the episode.)

And one would also think they might object to her staying on the planet and
getting married at the end of the story too.....

>
>Worse yet is another problem.  "If you were really Jamie and Zoe you
>would not have remembered me" makes no sense at all!  For all the Doctor
>knew, they were real, but taken from a point in time from before their
>memories were wiped.  I mean, the Doctor himself was taken from before he
>regenerated; why did he not consider the possibility that someone else
>was taken from before some important event in their life?
>--

More of a logical error than a continuity I think, but still very valid.
When Eric Saward wrote this in he really blew it.....


Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: sasse@netcom.com (Ellen Sasse)
Subject: Re: Sixth Doctor 
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 92 22:17:15 GMT
Organization: Not

xoanon@carina.unm.edu (timothy k istian soholt) writes: 

> (...)     And I'd have to disagree with your assertion that Peri
> was helpless -- Peri wasn't as competent as, say, Tegan or Jo, let
> alone companions like Ace, Romana, or Jamie, but she _was_ a bit more
> than a voice on legs.

Heh heh. Yeah, she was a shallow, whiny, silicone-implanted voice on legs!
(Actually they might have been real, I never watched it long enough to tell).
I could never sit through an episode with her in it 'cause I just couldn't
STAND to watch her not-act. Sarah Jane may have been helpless and even
somewhat whiny, but at least she could act! I never had to shut off an
episode because Elisabeth Sladen was in int!!

> I can already see the fireball coming my way.... :=)

My humble opinion, not a flame. I LOVE expressing frustration at
bad actors!! Especially when their presence casts such aspersions on
my country! I always wondered why they got such a bad Companion; I
always thought all the other ones had something going, but I was thinking
maybe they wanted to represent the stereotypical American and make fun of
one of their largest audiences - you have to admit Peri fits the
bill for the obnnoxious-American-stereotype.

Ellen "flamebait" sasse
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: mwasserm@diana.cair.du.edu (MARC Y. WASSERMAN)
Subject: Re: Sixth Doctor
Organization: University of Denver, Denver, Colorado
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 16:32:56 GMT

In article <torresce.716231222@craft.camp.clarkson.edu> torresce@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Carlos E. Torres) writes:
>bn823@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Peter Mullaney) writes:
>
>

>How about if we use the word...irritating?  Does that fit her better?  ;)
>I didn't hate her, but I might have perhaps rathered another...more 
>appealing character.  I know everybody has different tastes, so...did
>anybody out there like Peri?  We won't flame you...honest! ;)
>

I liked Peri very much.  She was quite appealing.  First off,
she was realistic.  Yes, of course, she (Nicola Bryant) did
the typical "What is it Doctor" and scream every time something
evil came around the next corner.  But she was genuine.  Look
at "Planet of Fire", the episode in which she was introduced.
Bryant played a teenager virtually imprisoned on a boring
archaeological dig (in her terms) very effectively.  
Secondly, she was alone with the Doctor for many episodes
and worked with two Doctors.  Difficult to say the least.
She was the only companion and thus had all the action placed
on her, plus she had to relate to the extremely different
Davison and Baker Doctors.
There are other companions I liked more than Peri.  But I
thought Bryant gave an excellent performance and I would
ahve liked to have seen more of her.
Besides, she's a babe.  :)

Marc Wasserman
mwasserm@diana.cair.du.edu
 
-- 
"So you're choosing to run from your own people in a rackety old TARDIS?"
		     D  O  C  T  O  R     W  H  O
				30 Years
"Why not?  After all, that's how it all started!"
From: HISC9016351D@LUST2.LATROBE.EDU.AU (MAMMONE,Robert)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: What's the difference (was Re: Video info...)
Date: 6 Sep 92 05:59:06 GMT
Organization: La Trobe University
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.22

In <1992Sep6.032751.12108@cs.ucf.edu> wilson@cs.ucf.edu writes:

 >The Five Doctors (90 mins, movie format, minor edits)
> 
> So what's the different between a one-episode episode format and a one-episode
> movie format (minor edits aside)?
> 
 If i understand your question correctly, the Five Doctors was broadcast in
one block, and released that way(one episode movie format) on video.  The
one episode-episode format refers, I think, to those shows compressed on
video release into one long show, without beginning and end credits, like
The Brain of Morbius.  For the curious, in one issue of DWM, about seven
years ago, they showed where the cliffhangers would've been in The Five
Doctors if it had been made as a four episode serial.  Cheers.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: wilson@cs.ucf.edu (tom wilson)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: What's the difference (was Re: Video info...)
Date: 6 Sep 92 03:27:51 GMT
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando

ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin) wrote:
>The Five Doctors (90 mins, movie format, minor edits)

So what's the different between a one-episode episode format and a one-episode
movie format (minor edits aside)?

Tom
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: don@jwt.UUCP (Don Ducharme)
Subject: Need  In Search of a Visions '92 Roommate!
Organization: Private System -- Orlando, FL
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:26:53 GMT

I will be attending the Visions '92 convention in Chicago this November
27 - 29, 1992.  I will be there all 3 days and I would greatly
appreciate having a roomie to split room expenses with!  If anyone is
interested in rooming with me, please e-mail me at this address ASAP!
I would prefer to stay in the "con hotel," which is the Ramada Hotel
O'Hare.  I'll be arriving late Thursday, probably around 10:20 p.m. and
I'll be leaving Sunday at 5 p.m.; so basically I'm looking at a room
for Thursday night, all day Saturday, with check out on Sunday.

* ABOUT MYSELF *

I am a fairly mature and responsible adult, in shape (I work out 5 - 6
days a week), NON-SMOKER (and I would prefer another non-smoker), into
Doctor Who, ST:TNG, science fiction, fantasy, etc.





Don






-- 
Don C. Ducharme -- don@jwt.UUCP (uunet!jwt!don)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: mrmuon@next02epsl.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins)
Subject: Re: Invasion of Time SUCKS! Was Re: Continuity catalog part two
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 16:11:58 GMT

In article <1992Sep14.223010.26300@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>  
ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin) writes:
> 	That's two stories.  Who has already done three on Gallifrey,
> and the fact that we're stuck in one city every time is really  
restrictve,
> I feel.
What about "the Five Doctors"?

    Despite the insults being hurled at it I still love this story; for  
the same reasons I loved it when I was 8. It convincingly makes the  
audience belive that the Doctor might have gone bad, a much better dark  
side than Colin Baker ever portrayed. I _especially_ liked the parts  
inside the TARDIS; there was a lot of humor there. The TARDIS resembled a  
huge closet full of junk. 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: NG.LAY@forsythe.stanford.edu (Laurie Yadon)
Subject: Re: Favorite Doctor
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 06:51:23 GMT

In article <1992Sep13.034747.2017@cs.rose-hulman.edu>,
stinerkt@NeXTwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu (Kevin T Stiner) writes:
>
> Is anyone taking a poll of peoples all time favorite Doctor
> (or did I miss it?)?  Just to put my 2 cents in, my favorite was
> Colin Baker (he was the first Doctor I have seen).  Because he
> was the Doctor that was current when I began to frequently watch
> the series, he reminds me of the Doctor more than any other actor.
> I loved his "dry wit" and I liked that he had trouble remembering
> his past.  In fact, if anyone has any info on what Mr. Baker is
> doing currently, I would really like to hear about him.

Since July 14th Colin has been touring the U.K. in the role of
Gerardo Escobar in Ariel Dorfman's acclaimed play, DEATH AND THE
MAIDEN, and all of the reviews I've seen so far have indicated
that both the production in general and Colin's performance in it
are superb!  He'll remain with the tour through November 21st.

He's then confirmed to appear at the  VISIONS '92  convention in
Chicago, November 27th - 29th!  I've heard that Nicola Bryant
(Peri) has also recently been added to their confirmed guest list.
For more info about the con, call their hotline:  (708) 405-WHO1.

On Dec. 7th Colin will begin rehearsing the role of 'The Captain'
in the pantomime DICK WHITTINGTON, which is scheduled to open on
Dec. 14th for a three-week run in Weymouth.

Laurie Yadon
Coordinator/Editor
The Baker Connection
(Colin's American fan club since 1987)
From: yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Dave Shariff Yadallee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: ANSWERS to QUIZ 7 - NOT!
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 92 05:24:27 MDT
Organization: Edmonton Remote Systems #3, Edmonton, AB, Canada

morgans@iscsvax.uni.edu writes:

-
-
- So what do I win?
-
- Siobahn (Shabang) Morgan
- morgans@iscsvax.uni.edu
-
- It's labor day, and here I am laboring away.  That sucks.

How about a trip to alt.fan.monty-python?

Dave Shariff Yadallee (yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca,
userLIBE@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca)
God Save the Queen, God Bless us All! Remember! Jesus Saves!!
Treaty of Maastricht, synonymous with the Key to Armageddon.
Xref: sparky rec.arts.drwho:5996 rec.arts.sf.tv:3138 rec.arts.startrek.current:12912
From: yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Dave Shariff Yadallee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.startrek.current
Subject: Re: The future?
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 92 05:35:19 MDT
Organization: Edmonton Remote Systems #2, Edmonton, AB, Canada

drwho@wpi.WPI.EDU (Eric Ant Von Laudermann) writes:

- In article <mVaqqB2w165w@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca> yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca
- >
-
- >doomsday is almost around the corner.  How many more deaths till the
Ultimate
- >Realization.
-
- Well, people are still being born faster than they are dying, so we're
- not "dying out", if that's what you mean.  Are you implying that
- people are dying because they don't believe in the end of the world???
-
- >Dave Shariff Yadallee (yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca,
- >userLIBE@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca)
-
- --E.V.L. (drwho@wpi.wpi.edu)        # "You have not heard one negative commen
- Disclaimer: "It's all absolutely    # from me about the other two people who
- devastatingly true, except the bits # want my job.  And you *won't* hear any
- that are lies."  --Douglas Adams    # until... um, the middle of August."
-                                     #                 --George Bush, June 199

 On a point of clarification,  as proven in the 2 previous World Wars, some
massive bad has to take place before something good.  Only by the end of WWII
did we acquire the nuclear factor.

  This should be taken to talk.religion.misc, however I beg the readers to
forgive me on a point of clarification.  Here's is what I believe will happen:

1) All Christians who person believe in Christ will be transfigured to
   immortality and meet Christ Jesus himself, for the first time in 2 millenia.

2) During a 7-year period, the most corrupt and lethal period in all history
   will take place.

3) After many deaths, suffering and neglect by self-centered, greedy mankind,
   Christ does take over the reigns of power.

Again to follow up these 3 points, follow up to talk.religion.misc.

To reiterate, I was saying that scifi paints an optomistic picture of the
future.  As a friend once told me, this is a form of escapism, and somehow, we
should not neglect reality.  Now, let's keep to the point.

Hopefully, this clears up somethings before a great big mess take place.

Dave Shariff Yadallee (yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca,
userLIBE@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca)
God Save the Queen, God Bless us All! Remember! Jesus Saves!!
Treaty of Maastricht, synonymous with the Key to Armageddon.
From: aflynn@osc.COM (Anthony Flynn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: ALL OUR TOMORROWS: The Doctor and Causality
Date: 11 Sep 92 21:06:21 GMT
Organization: Versant Object Technology, Menlo Park, CA

In article <torresce.715983170@craft.camp.clarkson.edu> torresce@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Carlos E. Torres) writes:
>
>I forgot to mention something...When the Doctor chose to become who he was, he
>left/blocked/erased his memories from the past.  This could have been to either
>feel free from any pressures that he might have felt knowing all that he knew,
>to protect himself, or perhaps there were other circumstances that we aren't
>aware of yet.
<deletions>
>	These are some more reasons why I think the Dr is or has a strong
>connection with Rassilon! 
>		Mystic
>
>(alex.soto@analog.com)

Why does everyone assume that the Doctor's Rassilon connections have already
taken place? Isn't it possible that the mysterious "third" figure referred
to in one of the novelizations ("Remembrance of the Daleks???") is actually
the Doctor at some time in his future relative to "now" (that is, the end
of the 7th Doctor's third season).

On another point, why don't we try and compile a list of all the "continuity
errors" in the series, preferably in chronological order, and then try and
come up with a "concordance" of explanations to fix them.
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Serial Codes: 7O or 7Q?
Date: 14 Sep 92 04:57:36 GMT
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout

In article <1992Sep13.212013.4196@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> greg@gallifrey.ucs.uoknor.edu (Greg Trotter) writes:
<Help!
<
<What is the proper BBS serial code for Ghost Light? While the list I ftp'd
<written by Lee Booth says it is 7Q, Lofficier's Terrestrial Index lists it
<at 7O. O doesn't seem to be a very popular letter; the only [other] O's
<listed are OO and OOO.

What the Hell is a BBS serial code?  Try BBC Production Code.

It was a typo in that reference.  It is indeed 7Q and his Programme Guide is
correct.
-- 
      harvard\                          spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown
Vidiot  ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
      rutgers/            INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc.UUCP@spool.cs.wisc.edu
                                   brown@wi.extrel.com
From: u6409886@ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Stranger in a Strange Land
Date: 11 Sep 92 00:27:28 GMT
Organization: The University of Melbourne

Maybe a tad out of place here, but since Robert Heinlein has appeared in
a recent thread, I would like to draw peoples attention to the recently
released unexpurgated version of "Stranger in a Strange Land". It is _much_
more readable than the first printed heavily cut edition, and is now the
great novel it always promised to be.

We now return you to your regular programme.

Andrew Davies
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: pjaffe@next04pg2.wam.umd.edu (Paul I. Jaffe)
Subject: Dr Who MOVIE
Keywords: movie
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 01:16:20 GMT

	I recall reading at one point in a book called "Dr. Who - 25  
Glorious Years" a mention of a possible Doctor Who movie - did this ever  
reach fruition?
From: gu@castle.ed.ac.uk (G Ushaw)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: tom baker years vid
Summary: is it any good?
Keywords: video
Date: 15 Sep 92 10:37:10 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: Edinburgh University

This months's releases from BBC video are Earthshock and The Tom baker
years. My question is , is the tom baker vid any good? worth the price
of admission? a load of old dalek droppings?
I had intended buying it til i saw it was a rip-off double tape and now
i'm not at all sure that i want to shell out twenty quid on it. Has
anyone seen it? what did you think? i've heard the choice of clips could
be better and baker isn't exactly on top form in the links...
i wish the beeb would stop fleecing us of our hard earned cash by
insisting they can't get six episodes on one tape - if JFK fits on a
single tape then planet of the spiders certainly will. TByears is about
3 hours long so why do they stick it on two tapes and charge twenty quid
for it?
Any comments, recommendations, warnings appreciated..

gary
From: Ric_Goldman_-C@hqops.3mail.3com.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Trials of a Time Lord
Date: 7 Sep 92 01:12:00 GMT

juonsteve@bvc.edu wrote:
>in fact, it should have been longer.  Perhaps the Time Lords could've 
>questioned the good ol' Doc about who he was, or is?  Or scrutinized why 
>he left Gallefrey? ...

I agree!  They touched on a lot of things that could have been VERY 
interesting, but as Sagacity said, "that is outside the jurisdiction of 
this court".  (darn, Darn, DARN! :-)

Just think - if it was more like a Congressional investigation, it would 
STILL be going on, and we could see new Dr. Who every day on C-SPAN!

/**********************************************************************\  
| Ric Goldman (not a stage name, | NoHo - Los Angeles' answer to SoHo. * 
|   but thanx for asking!)       | So if the clown behind the desk at  *
| Spellbinder Systems Group      | the local Howard Johnson's screws   *
| North Hollyweird, CA, USA, etc | up, Is that a NoHo HoJo Bozo NoNo?  *
\**********************************************************************/
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin)
Subject: Re: THE TARDIS
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 15:20:30 GMT

In article <2596.130.uupcb@ssr.com> doug.vermes%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Doug Vermes)  writes:
>
>Let me point out an inconsistency that's been bugging me for a while.
>It's in "Invasion of Time." As you may recall, the Doctor and company
>are trapped in the TARDIS, because the Sontarans are in the console room
>guarding the exit. This shouldn't be true. The Doctor shouldn't have
>been trapped in the TARDIS. What happened to the "Alternate" console
>room (the old wooden one), which ALSO had an exit from the TARDIS? The
>Doctod?n6>r;r could easily have left the TARDIS via THAT exit!
> .kb;7vw.s.wwwwww~
>       

We can retcon our way out of this one.
Before the Doctor and company hide in the corridors, the Doctor removes a
failsafe control, immobilizing all the TARDIS' systems and locking it
in its then-state until the circuit was replaced.
So, even if they did go to the secondary control room, they wouldn't be
able to get out, becuase exit via that room requires the Architectural
Configuration System to move the exit to that room, and with the circuits
all immobilized, they couldn't do it.

Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: c8643631@cc.newcastle.edu.au (I AM NOT ON DRUGS. HONEST. I WAS BORN THIS WAY.)
Subject: Re: Sixth Doctor
Organization: University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 06:52:33 GMT

In article <1992Sep5.004949.23384@mercury.cair.du.edu>, mwasserm@diana.cair.du.edu (MARC Y. WASSERMAN) writes:
> In article <1992Sep3.173949.27008@wam.umd.edu> mrmuon@next16pg2.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins) writes:
>>My basic criticism is that both the 1st and 6th Doctors showed a prominent  
>>grouchy, mean side. But I think William Hartnell did a much better job at  
>>being likable nonetheless.
> 
> That's just it.  Colin Baker was a good Doctor to be
> sure and had enough classic arrogance and grouchiness
> to be Hartnellish.  But Hartnell always showed
> generosity per episode.  He often was very kind and
> granfatherly (for instance, when he left Susan on
> Earth), understanding and could recognize his
> mistakes as mistakes (such as in Unearthly Child).
> Baker had the arrogance and grouchiness but dind't
> ever temper it with a nice side (he even tried to
> strangle Peri).  Rarely did he appear generous,and
> rarely did Baker's Doctor ever think he made a mistake
> or admitted it.  With Trouhgton that was funny.  With
> Baker it got annoying fast.

I never found it annoying at all, only funny. 

> 
> Marc Wasserman
> mwasserm@diana.cair.du.edu
> 
> -- 
> "So you're choosing to run from your own people in a rackety old TARDIS?"
> 		     D  O  C  T  O  R     W  H  O
> 				30 Years
> "Why not?  After all, that's how it all started!"

Edward D
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: The future?
From: ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead)
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 92 11:17:35 PDT
Organization: Paradox Alley F&SF BBS 805-492-8789

ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin) writes:

> Hang about here Nicholas.  Flaming somebody is one thing, but stepping
> on the deeply-held beliefs of a lot of people is another thing entirely,
> and I think you're walking the tightrope here.   Ease off the bile on
> religion.  Just because the right-wingers are the most vocal and least
> respectful people in religion today doesn't mean it's all bad.
> 

Naw, it's all bad on it's own right.  :)


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Catherine Beckstead                    ace@kryton.uucp
"Do you want to argue with a can of deodorant that registers
NINE on the Richter scale?"        --Ace, in "Dragonfire"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: mrmuon@next02epsl.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins)
Subject: Re: THE TARDIS
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 20:52:50 GMT

In article <2596.130.uupcb@ssr.com> doug.vermes%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Doug  
Vermes)  writes:
> 
> Let me point out an inconsistency that's been bugging me for a while.
> It's in "Invasion of Time." As you may recall, the Doctor and company
> are trapped in the TARDIS, because the Sontarans are in the console room
> guarding the exit. This shouldn't be true. The Doctor shouldn't have
> been trapped in the TARDIS. What happened to the "Alternate" console
> room (the old wooden one), which ALSO had an exit from the TARDIS? The
> Doctod?n6>r;r could easily have left the TARDIS via THAT exit!
The TARDIS only has one door. The alternate control room only has  
controls, but the main one is where most of the important devices and such  
are (eg: the time-space element). Presumably switching the location of the  
door from one control room to the other can only be done from the main  
control room.
At least I think there's only one door, but I haven't seen "Deadly  
Assassin" in a _long_ time.
From: doug.vermes%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Doug Vermes) 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: THE TARDIS
Date: 12 Sep 92 14:12:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Advanced Computer Concepts BBS, New Rochelle, NY 914-654-1981
Reply-To: doug.vermes%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Doug Vermes) 


Let me point out an inconsistency that's been bugging me for a while.
It's in "Invasion of Time." As you may recall, the Doctor and company
are trapped in the TARDIS, because the Sontarans are in the console room
guarding the exit. This shouldn't be true. The Doctor shouldn't have
been trapped in the TARDIS. What happened to the "Alternate" console
room (the old wooden one), which ALSO had an exit from the TARDIS? The
Doctod?n6>r;r could easily have left the TARDIS via THAT exit!
 .kb;7vw.s.wwwwww~
       
Xref: sparky rec.arts.drwho:5901 rec.arts.sf.tv:3080 rec.arts.startrek.current:12745