HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: rxs14@po.CWRU.Edu (Robert Stalder)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: DTK Computer
Date: 23 Nov 1992 17:28:48 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: rxs14@po.CWRU.Edu (Robert Stalder)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc4.ins.cwru.edu


If anyone out there has a tech bulletin or user's guide for the Fast ET 16
motherboard from DTK computer, please send me some mail stating so.  I am
in desparate need of this and the I can't reach DTK through their listed
phone numbers, so I am appealing to the net gods for help...  Thanks!
-- 
Rob Stalder                           "To know me ... is to beer me"
rxs14@po.CWRU.Edu
stalder@SCL.CWRU.Edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: ed@odi.com (Ed Schwalenberg)
Subject: Re: 486 vs. 386
Organization: Object Design, Inc.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 22:12:20 GMT

In article <1992Nov14.110834.524@global.hacktic.nl> peter@global.hacktic.nl (Peter Busser) writes:
  >>I hope the 586 comes out soon so I can get my 486/DX2-66 at a lower price :)

  >I wouldn't count on a lot of price impact right away.  Pentium will be
  >high-priced for some little while after its release.

  Sure, the 586 and the 486 do not have any competition. Yet. When AMD or any
  other competitor comes out with a 486, we'll see that the Intel 486 will drop
  in price rapidly to lower the margins of the competitor's processors.

A look at Intel's price list will show that their marketing policy (at least
insofar as published qty-1000 prices go) is strictly based on price/performance.
There is no "knee" in the curve when you get to the 386/486 boundary.

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Subject: Re: Stacker 2.0!
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:41:44 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc.

nbo@ravel.udel.edu (Adam Jay Geffner) writes:

>	saved close to if not over another meg of stuff since then.  On the
>	other hadn, when I check my D drive, it shows that about 41 of my 42
>	meg drive has been used.  If that is so, which according to further
>	probing, seems ot be true, then I should only have about 2 or 3 megs 
>	available, not 10.

Stacker does not allocate its space on the fly.  The 41 Meg was
pre-allocated when you created the Stacker drive, and it will never
change unless you use SDEFRAG /G to change it.

>		DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON ???

SCHECK should show you exactly what's going on.  It tells you how much
actual space is used in the Stacker volume, as well as how much is free,
and how this translates to space within the virtual Stacker drive.

Not ALL of the 41 Meg on your D drive is being used by Stacker.

-- 
#ifdef TRUE        | Fuzzy Fox (a.k.a. David DeSimone)       fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0  |
#define  FALSE  1  |  "You have been recruited by the Star League to defend
#endif             |     the Frontier against Xur and the Kodan Armada."
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: jrv@truth.mitre.org (Van Zandt)
Subject: Re: Screen Magnification S/W
Organization: The MITRE Corp., Bedford, Ma.
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:23:05 GMT

In article <haydenw.98.0@elp.aero.org> haydenw@elp.aero.org (bill hayden) writes:
>I have impaired vision (cataracts, bad retina, etc) and am evaluating
>display magnification packages (S/W at this time) such as ZoomText from
>Telesensory Systems.
>Are there TSR type programs available as Shareware (accessable via FTP?)
>that provide display enhancement functions ?

Try the collection in pd:<msdos.handicap> at wsmr-simtel20.army.mil,
or its mirror wuarchive.wustl.edu.

By the way, my email to haydenw@elp.aero.org got bounced.

             - Jim Van Zandt <jrv@mbunix.mitre.org>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: it1@ra.msstate.edu (Tim Tsai)
Subject: Re: TV on the monitor
Organization: Mississippi State University
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 13:45:34 GMT

ab245@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Sam Latonia) writes:
>DAYMARK is selling the TV/VIDEO card for $199
>I think thats DAMARK not DAY...

  Can you tell me what make is this adapter by Damark?  Thanks..
From: Jim_Johnson@abcd.Houghton.MI.US (Jim Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: MS-DOS 5.0 and AutoCad v11 Slowdown - Why?
Date: 18 Nov 92 14:54:26 GMT
Article-I.D.: abcd.Jim_Johnson.0b3z
Distribution: world
Organization: Amiga BitSwap Central Dispatch

The reason for the slowdown is MS-DOS 5.0's use of UMBs.  Check your
EMM386.SYS line in your CONFIG.SYS.  You CAN'T use the NOEMS switch as the
DOS extender in AutoCAD will bomb.  However, if you DON'T use the NOEMS,
then DOS 5.0 will create simulated EMS memory of at least 64K.

AutoCAD looks first for EMS memory, and if I read the docs right, will
ignore XMS (extended) memory if it finds EMS.  Therefore, if you use
EMM386.SYS, convert ALL (or as much as you can possibly spare) your XMS
memory to EMS.  

Your next choice is to not use EMM386.SYS at all (i.e., don't load DOS into
high memory and don't use UMBs at all - only use conventional memory). 
Then AutoCAD can access all your XMS as XMS.

Finally, you could purchase the Windows extension to AutoCAD and run it as
a Windows 3.x application with speed reduction (but not as slow as you
mention).

I installed AutoCAD v11 and Windows 3.0 (which perfers NOEMS, and XMS) on a
machine and had to compromise the performance of both to run them under the
same CONFIG.SYS.

Fun isn't it?

-- Via DLG Pro v0.995

jim_johnson@abcd.houghton.mi.us
from Calumet, Michigan, USA -the world's former copper mining capital, 
located on Lake Superior and home to America's newest National Park,
** The Keweenaw National Historic Park **
From: shedevil@vix.com (Anne P. Mitchell JD)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Question about W.P. 5.1 Footers
Date: 18 Nov 1992 11:36:28 -0800
Organization: Knapp & Viola, Atts. at Law, San Mateo, CA
Reply-To: shedevil@gw.home.vix.com (Anne P. Mitchell, J.D.)
NNTP-Posting-Host: gw.home.vix.com


Does anyone know how to insert a footer which automatically prints the
directory\filename of the document you are working on on the bottom of
the page?  I can't find it in the docs anywhere!

Thanks!

-- 
   LOOKING FOR:  David Widdicombe, Hobson Woodward, Lorna Taylor & JJ Lancey
I am: Anne Mitchell, mom, & founder of the Fathers' Rights & Equality Exchange
Ask me about FREE!  FREE files available via anonymous ftp 128.45.1.1; dir /pub
		     TIBI GRATIAS AGIMUS QUOD NIHIL FUMAS
From: yongje@hardy.u.washington.edu (Yong Je Lim)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Librex notebook compter, info needed
Date: 23 Nov 92 07:57:06 GMT
Article-I.D.: u.1992Nov23.075706.8656
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle

if you have a notebook from Librex, especially 386 version, could you
share some information about the system performance?  I love to hear
about DISPLAY and their technical support ,too....  
Thanks.

- Yong J. Lim -
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: nbo@ravel.udel.edu (Adam Jay Geffner)
Subject: Re: Stacker 2.0!
Organization: University of Delaware
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 18:52:39 GMT

>In <5277@calmasd.Prime.COM> bfw@calmasd.Prime.COM (Brian Wilson) writes:
>
>
>>Since I purchase 2.0 on 10/25 I immediately called their BBS to see if
>>I qualified for a free upgrade.  The free upgrade window is 10/26 ->
>>11/30.  I missed it by a day.  What a bummer.  I am not even using the
>>2.0 version because the first time I tried to stack an existing disk
>>it destroyed all my info.  The second time on my newlly formatted hard
>>disk the stacked partition upset chkdsk very much.  I think the
>>problem was with QEMM386.  They say they support it and everything,
>>but I quit using QEMM and my third attempt to create a stacked
>>partition was successful.  Unfortunately, after I loaded a 80 MB
>>stacked partition with a lot of my data (compiler, games, mathmatica)
>>I only got a 1.3 compression ratio and it wasn't worth the trouble.
>
>The new version supposedly recognizes that QEMM optimize is running,
>and you should probably still get 630K freee WITH stacker running.
>
>Phil


	Hi everyone, this is not specifically in response to the above, thats
	why I don't really have it listed as a follow up.  I do however
	have a problem with Stacker 2.0 as well.  Up until now, I've had no
	complaints, no problems, and it has compacted my data at a 2:1 ratio.
		However, starting about 2 weeks ago, my storage space left on
	my 40 meg drive (81 when stacked) which was down to roughly
	5 megs (vs the 81), started top increase in storage space.
 	Even when I staretd to save additional stuff on the computer, it kept
	increasing little by little.  It is now upto about 10 megs, and I have
	saved close to if not over another meg of stuff since then.  On the
	other hadn, when I check my D drive, it shows that about 41 of my 42
	meg drive has been used.  If that is so, which according to further
	probing, seems ot be true, then I should only have about 2 or 3 megs 
	available, not 10.  Also, it is not just that 1 of my programs is      
	reading it incorrectly, as 10 megs, so far, all that I use to check
	it (i.e. Dirworks, Laptop File Manager, dos, etc.) say the same.

		DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON ???
        Please mail all info, or possible reasons to me at my e-mail account!
	Thanx...
			Adam Geffner        nbo@brahms.udel.edu


Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: gac2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Geoffrey A. Coulter)
Subject: Re: Hard disk and CPU Speed.
Reply-To: gac2@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 08:03:33 GMT

In article <1eiuk1INN1v0@lucy.cs.widener.edu> quairoli@cs.widener.edu (Patrick Quairoli) writes:
>i have resently built a 386 33Mhz with 2 IDE Seagate drives, (which
>used to be on a different 386 33Mhz board). 
>
>the problem is this, the hard drives won't boot if the turbo switch is
>on.  so if i want to boot the machine i have to drop it to 17Mhz.
>
>even at 17Mhz, none of the norton disk utilities work!
>
>help me find some kind of solution.  should i get a different
>controller or should i try a different 386 board (yes i have a spare).
>
>
>-- 
>_____________________________________________________________________________
>patrick quairoli           quairoli@cs.widener.edu		department of
>rebel coordinator	    widener university		     computer science
>"Time is a Spiral - Space is a Curve" - Rush 

It sounds like you have the bus speed set at clk/1 (i.e. 33mhz or 17
mhz).  Go into your BIOS and set it to clk/4, and maybe everything
will work form there.

Good luck.

Geoffrey Coulter
gac2@ellis.uchicago.edu
coulter@guvax.georgetown.edu
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:14850 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:30442 comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware:2113
From: buckland@ucs.ubc.ca (Tony Buckland)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Subject: Reviews/Opinions on PS/ValuePoint 486SX/25?
Date: 20 Nov 1992 17:13:01 GMT
Organization: University Computing Services, UBC, Canada
NNTP-Posting-Host: swiss.ucs.ubc.ca

 The subject says it all; does anyone know of any reviews published
 so far, or have any opinions, on the 486SX/25 model in the
 PS/ValuePoint line?  Shortcomings?  Comparisons to PS/2 and PS/1
 lines?  Comparisons to other 486SX/25s?  Thanks for all offerings.
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: millernw@craft.camp.clarkson.edu (Neal Miller)
Subject: Cyrix DLC
Organization: Clarkson University
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 20:39:27 GMT

	I've heard some talk about a new chip from Cyrix that is supposed
to greatly improve the processor speed of almost any 386 system, almost to
the speed of a 486.  I have yet to hear anything about the chip in any 
magazine or advertisement.  Does this chip in fact exist?


--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Neal Miller         | "Why not go mad?"  | millernw@craft.camp.clarkson.edu
 Clarkson University |     - Ford Prefect |     dark@craft.camp.clarkson.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: sidbury@sparrow.cs.uofs.edu (Dick Sidbury)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: POS software needed
Date: 21 Nov 92 17:47:29 GMT
Organization: Department of Computing Sciences

My wife's business needs to be integrated and I have been asked to find out
about possible POS software as compared to a POS cash register.  Thanks

dick sidbury
sidbury@jaguar.uofs.edu <-- please reply to this address as I read my mail here
				rather than at my sun account
From: kahn@wupost.wustl.edu (Michael Kahn)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Professional profiling software
Date: 23 Nov 1992 22:37:25 -0600
Organization: Washington University in Saint Louis, MO USA
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: informatics.wustl.edu
Summary: Looking for software that keeps profiles of professionals
Keywords: Personnel tracking

I'm looking for a software package that will enable me to keep track
of various aspects of the professional activities of the physicians in
our medical school department.  For example, we'd like to store and
retrieve the list of physicians who belong to a specific professional
organization or who received grants from a specific organization or
who have received awards in the past year.  Yes we COULD write our own
database application, but I'm wondering if any package already exists
or if somebody has used a more general product for this purpose.

Thanks for any info in advance,
Michael Kahn
(kahn@informatics.WUSTL.EDU)
From: joel@upchrch.UUCP (Joel Upchurch  )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Stacker 3.0!
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 13:58:28 EST
Organization: Upchurch Computer Consulting, Orlando FL

bfw@calmasd.Prime.COM (Brian Wilson) writes:

> 11/30.  I missed it by a day.  What a bummer.  I am not even using the
> 2.0 version because the first time I tried to stack an existing disk
> it destroyed all my info.  The second time on my newlly formatted hard
> disk the stacked partition upset chkdsk very much.  I think the
> problem was with QEMM386.  They say they support it and everything,
> but I quit using QEMM and my third attempt to create a stacked
> partition was successful.  Unfortunately, after I loaded a 80 MB
> stacked partition with a lot of my data (compiler, games, mathmatica)
> I only got a 1.3 compression ratio and it wasn't worth the trouble.

From my experience Stacker won't work correctly when loaded high, which
might have been what caused your problem.

I have two hard drives on my system, so I stack the D drive and my
RAM disk. I put stuff that doesn't compress well, like GIF files, on
the C drive. Where Stacker really pays off for me is with Waffle.
Waffle is a BBS system that provides me with my Usenet news feed.
That is what I'm using now. With the various news group I read I end
up with several thousand small text files on my system, because each
article is a separate file. Stacker compresses these files about
5 to 1.

(If your mail bounces use the address below.)
Joel Upchurch/Upchurch Computer Consulting/718 Galsworthy/Orlando, FL 32809
joel@peora.ccur.com {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd,ucf-cs}!peora!joel (407) 859-0982
From: dold@mitisft.Convergent.COM (Clarence Dold)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: FIXED HP Fonts Wanted!
Date: 17 Nov 92 04:33:33 GMT
Organization: Unisys Unix Systems Group, San Jose, CA


From article <1992Nov16.150933.251@hsh.com>, by paul@hsh.com:
> We are looking for a variety of FIXED fonts for the HP Laserjet II/III.  

Elfring Soft Fonts. POBox 61, Wasco, IL 60183  708-377-3520

> We definitely need fixed (not proportional) fonts -- and nothing fancy like
> Clown Nose Bold, Reverse Klingon Gothic, or Fish Scale Italic. 

But I really like "Blippo", kind of rounded, blimp-like.

-- 
---
Clarence A Dold - dold@tsmiti.Convergent.COM
               ...pyramid!ctnews!tsmiti!dold
From: joel@upchrch.UUCP (Joel Upchurch  )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: stacker 3
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 13:40:50 EST
Organization: Upchurch Computer Consulting, Orlando FL

sknkwrks@sonny-boy.cs.unlv.edu (Scott Alfter) writes:

> I thought it was interesting that ZIP files could be further packed.
> Most of the ZIPs on my system are sampled sounds and MODs...files that
> aren't easily packed to begin with.  Then again, PKZIP isn't exactly
> the best file packer in the world...it's only the most common.

Any compression you see on ZIP files is probably because Stacker can
store multiple files in the same block and not leave any waste space
at the end of the block. When you see 16:1 data compression reported
for stacker it is usually for tiny batch files and such that leave a
lot of wasted space in a block.

(If your mail bounces use the address below.)
Joel Upchurch/Upchurch Computer Consulting/718 Galsworthy/Orlando, FL 32809
joel@peora.ccur.com {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd,ucf-cs}!peora!joel (407) 859-0982
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: mp2@irz209.inf.tu-dresden.de (Matthias Paschke)
Subject: NEDD POLISH Charset!!
Reply-To: paschke@freia.inf.tu-dresden.de
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, TU Dresden, Germany.
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 20:45:48 GMT



Help me!

I am looking for a polish charset, which should be used under Windows 3.xx.
Is there anybody, who could send me this?

------------------------+---------------------------------------------.
| Matthias Paschke       | TCP/IP-Mail: paschke@freia.inf.tu-dresden.de|
|   (91/08/11)           |                                             |
+------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
|           How does an octopuss come into a bottle??????              |
|                                                                      |
|                       W E L L A R M E D                              |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'
From: kennedy_d@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (Damian Kennedy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: QUADTEL BIOS AND DOS 5.0
Date: 21 Nov 1992 01:00:19 GMT
Organization: Wellington City Council (Public Access), Wgtn, Nz
Reply-To: kennedy_d@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz
NNTP-Posting-Host: kosmos.wcc.govt.nz

I am currently experiencing an *interesting* thing.

When I boot the below system under MS-DOS 3.3 the A20 defaults to disabled (as you would expect it should with no HIMEM.SYS loaded). BUT when the exact system is booted on MS-DOS 5.0 the A20 is defaulting to enabled and I am unable to disable it.

Has anyone else encountered this problem??
Anyone got any ideas on how to disable the A20.?? A piece of software I have  
requires the A20 be disabled when it initilizes the keyboard on installation.

80386SX/20
5MB DRAM
QUADTEL BIOS and KEYBOARD BIOS.

The boot disks I am using only contain IO.SYS/MSDOS.SYS and COMMAND.COM they are nice clean simple boot disks.
 
KENNEDY_D@KOSMOS.WCC.GOVT.NZ
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: holbrook@apollo.HP.COM (Alan R. Holbrook)
Subject: 'All Possible Combinations' Algorithm
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:01:54 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Chelmsford, MA
Keywords: combinations

Can someone provide me with an algorithm suitable for writing a program
to dump all possible combinations of 'n' elements taken 'm' at a time?
That is, given the string 'abcdefghijklmnop', I'd like to be able to produce
all possible combinations of, say, 'abcde', then of 'abcdf', or of 'cfilnop'
then 'aceghilmp', etc.  I think you get the idea.

I'm sure anyone who has taken any statistics knows the formula for doing
this, but I never took any statistics.

I know, by the way, that I'm talking ._!LOTS!_. of combinations.  I don't
really need to be able to print or file all of them, I just need to know
how to.

Oh, yeah, in case anyone is tempted to wonder, this isn't for a class or any
other kind of assignment.  Actually, I need to be able to demonstrate a point
to my wife...

Thanks,
Alan Holbrook
holbrook@apollo.hp.com
No .sig, I just post on impulse.



Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 20:42:11 -0500 
From: Douglas Lee Nigen <dn15+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Trident Drv Help!

I was able to download the window driver from nic.funet.fi.  After I made
the changes in the Setup it asked me to insert MS windows disk 1 and I did
s then it asked me for MS windows disk 2 and then I inserted disk 2 but
then it still asked me for disk 2?  am I missing some files?  is my
disk 2 damaged?

Thanks.

Doug.
From: plumpe@oasys.dt.navy.mil (David Plumpe)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: MS-DOS 5.0 and AutoCad v11 Slowdown - Why?
Date: 17 Nov 92 17:46:33 GMT
Reply-To: plumpe@oasys.dt.navy.mil (David Plumpe)
Distribution: na
Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc, ssanbeg@visual.spk.wa.us (Scott Sanbeg) writes:
>I ran into a problem today, upgrading a machine to MS-DOS 5.0.
>AutoCad v11 ran fairly quick on the system with MS-DOS v4.01
>installed - upgrading to DOS 5.0 caused a tremendous slowdown
>in performance (about ten minutes before the acad menu finally
>showed up).
>
Scott:
    I don't have the definitive answer, by any means, but I've heard
that ACAD11 wants total control over memory and has a real tough time
if there's any conflict.  I have 2 486/33 systems from different mfgrs.
On one, ACAD11 runs fine under QEMM386; on the other, it snails under
either QEMM386 or DOS's HIMEM.SYS, but runs fine with neither.
    I'm guessing you have HIMEM.SYS installed and have the same problem
I have.  That's a real bummer, since without a high memory manager,
all devices have to load low and eat up memory.
    If you find a solution, or get good EMAIL responses, please share
them with me.

-DaveP        plumpe@oasys.dt.navy.mil
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: speedy@engr.latech.edu (Alfred "Speedy" Mercer)
Subject: Re: Stacker 3.0!
Organization: Louisiana Tech University
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:09:46 GMT

In article <5277@calmasd.Prime.COM> bfw@calmasd.Prime.COM (Brian Wilson) writes:
>I am not even using the
>2.0 version because the first time I tried to stack an existing disk
>it destroyed all my info.  The second time on my newlly formatted hard
>disk the stacked partition upset chkdsk very much.  I think the
>problem was with QEMM386.  They say they support it and everything,
>but I quit using QEMM and my third attempt to create a stacked
>partition was successful.  Unfortunately, after I loaded a 80 MB
>stacked partition with a lot of my data (compiler, games, mathmatica)
>I only got a 1.3 compression ratio and it wasn't worth the trouble.
>Brian Wilson

I am using Stacker _2.01_ on a 40MHz 386dx with 2 IDE hard drives and 
running 2 network cards on 2 seperate networks as well as a TON of TSR's.
I am using QEMM386 and am able to run Optimize using version 2.01 of 
Stacker . . . this was not true for version 2.0.  Stacker 3.0 has this 
ability and more.  It is also supposed to have an Un-Install feature.  I 
HAVE un-installed version 2.0 using a trick or two, but is IS possible.
Not fun, but possible!

<A satisfied Stacker customer, not an employee!>

 ******************************* DISCLAIMER *********************************
  My employer doesn't even KNOW I am posting this much less approve or agree
                                  with it!
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: vagle@hsr.no (James Bond)
Subject: what BSD386 ?
Organization: Rogaland University Centre
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 18:11:53 GMT

Help me, what is BSD386 and what is so good about that ?

Thanks.

-- 
 Lars Vagle.  E-mail: vagle@hsr.no  Phone: +47-4-874220
Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:14741 comp.os.ms-windows.apps:4972
From: sph0301@utsph.sph.uth.tmc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.apps
Subject: Re: XTREE for Windows
Date: 17 Nov 1992 14:08:01 GMT
Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Organization: Univ. of Texas School of Public Health


I'm really disappointed in this product... can't believe they released
it without either a PRINT or EDIT function - those are pretty basic.
INVERT TAGS is another feature I use a lot in XTREE/DOS that is missing
in XTREE/WIN... and OOPS too.

I'm sticking with File Manager and XTREE/DOS in a window - anyone want to
buy a new (not yet registered) copy of XTREE/WIN? 

kate wilson
UT Health Science Center, Houston