HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: mcrowley@mtholyoke.edu (Michael A. Crowley)
Subject: Re: Station Address and the Ethernet Packet
Organization: Mount Holyoke College
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 16:40:16 GMT


apple@drvax3.msfc.nasa.gov (Kathleen Applegate) writes:
: Which address is used in the ethernet header for the packet
: going out on the wire:
: 
:     - The hardware address hardcoded onto the ethernet
:       card (e.g. 08:00:2B:25:D9:A6)?
:     - Or, the station address whose last three number
:       sets are calculated based on the DECnet address
:       (e.g. AA-00-04-00-B9-23)
:                      ^^^^^^^^ calculated
>>>>>>                    ^^^^^ calculated

If you are in an NDIS situation and wish to change the
hardware address to correspond with the station address
(   c:\> use /status  )
you could enter something like this for the netaddress line
in the protocol.ini file.  This is something needed when,
for example, using both, IBM PC support and Pathworks.
(Of course this would be a local boot situation.)

------------------
; PROTOCOL.INI file create by DNETOMO.V41 V4.1.060
;                         via DNETWIK.V41 V4.1.047

[protocol manager]
DRIVERNAME = PROTMAN$

[ELNKMC.DOS]
DRIVERNAME = ELNKMC$
MAXTRANSMITS = 20
NETADDRESS = AA000400BBB6
....
------------------
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE: Still problems writing to disk and file services
From: "Glen Larwill, Computing Services, (403)294-8380" <NETMGR02@CBE.AB.CA>
Date: 12 Nov 1992 13:19:00 -0700
X-VMS-Cc: NETMGR02
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

>>         Last but not least, when I create a file or disk service using the
>> PCSA_MANAGER menu, it goes to the system disk by default.  Is it possible to
>> change this to another disk?  I know you can use the command line to create a
>> file service on another disk but I would like to make another disk the
 default
>> when using the menu.
>>
>
>I have done this, but I don't have my notes handy right now.  If you still need
>it, let me know and I will dig them up...
 
I found that I was unable to create it from the menu.  I had to exit the
menu and create the disk from the PCSA_MANAGER prompt.  Use the command
CREATE DISK filespec /ALLOC=x /SIZE=x to create the disk.  (Use HELP CREATE
DISK to find out more info on the /ALLOC and /SZIE qualifiers.)  Then you
can use the menu to mount the .dsk file as a service from the Service
Options | Modify Disk Service | Mount Disk menus.  The first question it
asks you is to enter the Disk File Name, at this prompt, supply the drive
and file name that you created.
 
 
 
     Glen Larwill, Network Technician,
     Calgary Board of Education
     Internet:   glarwill@cbe.ab.ca
From: wasser@ranger.enet.dec.com (ranger::wasser)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Can't be done with DISK services
Date: 11 Nov 92 05:00:38 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
X-Posted-Via: NEWS-NOTES gateway (a hack!)

>  Can anybody tell me if there is a way to mount a disk service in such a way
> as to allow everybody RWED access?  

	If you realy mean DISK service (not FILE service) then it cannot
	be done.  It would be like connecting the same hard disk to
	several PCs at the same time.  Since each PC keeps a copy of
	the file allocation table in memory there is nothing to
	prevent two or more PCs from using the same part of the
	disk.  

	If you want to use a FILE service, see a previous reply that
	tells how it can be done.

				-John A. Wasser
				 Principal Software Engineer
				 Personal Computing Systems Group
				 Digital Equipment Corporation
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE: Windows for Workgroups
From: Dave Tindall - Seattle Pacific University <d_tindall@LUKE.SPU.EDU>
Date: 10 Nov 1992 07:58:26 -0800 (PST)
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Bob Hodge writes...
 
>   We haven't been successful yet, but I expect to get everything working
> when we install the new Pathworks for DOS upgrade.  This upgrade is
> called (I think) Pathworks Upgrade for Lan Manager v2.1 and was documented
> in DEC's "CSOupdate" in the August 24th issue.
>   It will enable coexistance between DECnet and NETBEUI transports. (According
> to dox.)
 
Bob --
Please post to the list your progress on this item. I'm sure many of us are
anxious to hear the results.
 
By the way.... maybe I missed the announcement, but I haven't heard any
specific dates for updated versions of Pathworks. Anybody out in "netland"
have news about that?
>===============================================================<
: David W. Tindall                              SSSS            :
: Executive Director                            S    PPPP       :
: Seattle Pacific University                    SSSS P  P U  U  :
: Computer & Information Systems                   S PPPP U  U	:
: INTERNET:  d_tindall@luke.spu.edu             SSSS P	  U  U	:
: PHONE & VOICE MAIL: (206)281-2239                  P	  U  U	:
: FAX: (206)281-2850                                      UUUU	:
>===============================================================<
From: terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Re: Netware Coexistence question
Date: 10 Nov 92 11:41:55 GMT
Organization: St. Peter's College, US

In article <01GQXWT2UUCI001GEK@uthscsa.edu>, MITCHELL@SPCMAIL.UTHSCSA.EDU writes:
> I've just installed the Netware Coexistence package for the first time, with
> PW 4.1 and DOS 5.0.  I'm functionally Novell-illiterate, but I can now get a
> connection to a server using NET3 or NET4 (with the help of SETVER).  However
> NET5, which I think is the appropriate version for DOS 5, simply hangs the
> machine.  Does anyone recoginize the problem based on this minimal description?

  As far as I know, NET5 was a Band-Aid solution and has been replaced (as
have NET3 and NET4) with NETX, EMSNETX, and XMSNETX. You can get these from
CompuServe, Novell resellers, or Novell directly, probably in order of in-
creasing price 8-). That may fix your problem.

	Terry Kennedy		Operations Manager, Academic Computing
	terry@spcvxa.bitnet	St. Peter's College, Jsersey City, NJ USA
	terry@spcvxa.spc.edu	+1 201 915 9381
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE: 10BaseT Cards for MCA (PS/2)
From: "(Paul St. Amand)" <STAMANDP@CCSUA.CTSTATEU.EDU>
Date: 11 Nov 1992 14:35:44 -0500
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Vmsmail-To: SMTP%"LANWORKS@MIAMIU.ACS.MUOHIO.EDU"

>We are in the process of connecting several IBM PS/2s to our PathWorks
>network.  For our PCs, we are using 3COM and DEPCA cards.  We are now
>looking for cards for IBM's MCA.  3COM makes an MCA card, but it seems
>a bit expensive.  Has anyone had any experience with any other brand
>of card?
>
>Thanks in advance for any information,
>
>Ken Harris
>UMBC
 
Hello Ken,
 
Where I work we are using DEC TurboEtherworks cards and are very hapyy with
them.  You will find the the MCA cards are more expensive all around. Anyone
know why??? (licensing from IBM probably is part)
 
-Paul
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 Paul R. St. Amand                    | DECNET(ctstateu) CCSU::STAMANDP
 Central Connecticut State University | Internet stamandp@ccsu.ctstateu.edu
 ITT Hartford, Finance                | BITNET   stamandp@ctstateu.BITNET
 DECUS CVLUG                          | (203) 547 - 4030 (Business)
 
 Disclaimer: These comments are mine and do not reflect the administration
             or policies of Connecticut State University or ITT Hartford.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: BECKERJA%WPO1P%WPO2V@SNYCENVA.BITNET (Jim Becker)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: 10BaseT Cards for MCA (PS/2) -Reply
Date: 12 Nov 92 15:55:00 GMT
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

We use DEC212s and 3Com 3C523/MC boards.
 
We also use Cabletron E3100 and Interlan NI9210 boards with good
success.
 
DEC's DE212 currently takes up too much room in Upper memory and
is very inflexible as far as placement.  We have tested a newer
version of this board which can use a 16K memory block at ANY 4K
boundary in Upper memory with good success, however, I don't
think it's released yet.
 
For us, Cabletron is currently the least expensive on State
contract.  3COM may become more price competitive soon as they
are trying to capture a larger percentage of this market.
 
==================================================================
Jim Becker          |  __   LAN WP ____\ VMS WP ____\ WP/VMS Mail
State Univ. of NY   | |ME|  Office     / Office     /   Gateway
Central Admin.      |  ~~                                  |
TEL: (518) 443-5548 |                                      |
FAX: (518) 443-5799 |  ___   /~\__/~\                      V
E-MAIL:             | |YOU| |Internet| /___ Joiner /___ Innosoft
  BECKERJA@SNYCENVA |  ~~~   \_/~~\_/  \     JNET  \      PMDF
==================================================================
 
================== Original message text ===================
 
Subj:     10BaseT Cards for MCA (PS/2)
 
We are in the process of connecting several IBM PS/2s to our
PathWorks network.  For our PCs, we are using 3COM and DEPCA
cards.  We are now looking for cards for IBM's MCA.  3COM makes
an MCA card, but it seems a bit expensive.  Has anyone had any
experience with any other brand of card?
 
Thanks in advance for any information,
 
Ken Harris
UMBC
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Printing to HP LaserJet IIISi with LAT
From: Kyle Gasser <gasser@SSC.WISC.EDU>
Date: 11 Nov 1992 13:09:46 -0600
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-cc:         hauser@ssc.wisc.edu

        Setting it up in PostScript is fine, setting it up to take ASCII is
great.  Is there anyone out there who can print send either an ASCII or
PostScript file to a queue with a IIISi waiting on the end, and have the
printer discern whether the job is ASCII or postscript?  The printer needn't
be a HP, but anyone had success doing it?  A simple yes or no answer would
be dandy.
 
        Kyle R. Gasser
        Center for Demography and Ecology
        University of Wisconsin-Madison
        Madison, WI
From: egntoh@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Toh Guan Nge)
Subject: Re: Intel Etherexpress anyone?
Organization: Nanyang Technological University - Singapore
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 01:35:29 GMT

I have also installed the Intel card for pathwork for dos(DECNET) and it
worked fine. But when I wanted to install for Pathwork (TCPIP), the card
behaved unpredictably, even when all the drivers are successfully installed.

Anyone has any luck got it work with TCPIP ?


--
Toh Guan Nge, School of EEE,
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Internet Email: egntoh@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg
Bitnet   Email: egntoh@ntuvax.bitnet
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks,news.software.readers,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Windows Newsreader for Pathworks, LanManager (& maybe WinSock)
From: rushing@titan.ksc.nasa.gov (Sam Rushing)
Date: 5 Nov 92 20:32:53 EST
Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center

I've placed a heavily modified version of Mark Riordan's WINVN NNTP
newsreader (for Microsoft Windows 3.X) up for anonymous ftp.  This
newsreader was originally written to use FTP Inc.'s TCP/IP.  The new
version has several enhancements, including a more informative article
subject window; and works with DEC's Pathworks TCP/IP, which is based
on 3Com's 3+Open and Microsoft LanManager/TCPIP. It uses the
WSOCKETS.DLL library distributed with those packages.

I've also compiled a version that *should* be WinSock compliant, but
since the WinSock 1.0 standard was just released at InterOp this week,
I don't have a WinSock implementation yet, and I can't test it.  I'm also
not sure I did it right.  I'd appreciate feedback/patches to the code
from anyone that gets it working.

It no longer works with FTP Inc.'s TCP/IP.  Sorry.

[The socket code is small, and anyone with a simple BSD-compatible
 socket library for windows should be able to port this with no 
 problems.]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can grab this distribution via anonymous ftp from

titan.ksc.nasa.gov (128.159.4.20)
login as anonymous,
cd to pub,
cd to win3
cd to winvn

winvn.exe is a self-extracing lharc file containing:
   winvn.exe       ; for Pathworks/LanMan
   winvnstd.exe    ; WinSock
   winvn.ini       ; config file
   newsrc          ; example newsrc file
   announce.txt    ; this announcement
   readme.txt      ; Standard Blurb
   develop.txt     ; Note for developers

The file vnsrc.lzh is an lharc file of the sources.

Enjoy!

Sam Rushing
rushing@titan.ksc.nasa.gov
From: backstrom@ranger.enet.dec.com (ranger::backstrom)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE: PATHWORKS TCP/IP on Intel EtherExpress Card
Date: 11 Nov 92 05:00:50 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
X-Posted-Via: NEWS-NOTES gateway (a hack!)

>                     egntoh@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Toh Guan Nge)
>                  pathwork TCP/IP on Intel EtherExpress Card 
>
>Has anyone been successful in installing Pathwork TCP/IP to work on Intel
>EtherExpress Card. I hv trouble getting it to run FTP and Net USE.

    Please explain what "trouble getting it to run" really mens. In other
    words, without having an Intel board (but I've heard people have used
    them successfully), it is hard to guess at what's going wrong with your
    setup. I.e.
    
        What, exactly, have you tried?
        What, exactly, happens?
        What are the exact error messages you see (if any)?
        Is there anything that works? If so, what?
        How, exactly, is/was your system configured?

    ...petri (petri.backstrom@ljo.mts.dec.com)
       Personal Computing Integration Engineering
       Digital Equipment Corporation
From: hogstedt@ae.chalmers.se (Per Hogstedt)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE: Making CD available (Opti-Net?!)
Date: 13 Nov 92 01:35:11 GMT
Organization: Dept. of Applied Electronics. Chalmers Univ. of Technology.

In article <1992Nov11.050043.19095@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>,
backstrom@ranger.enet.dec.com (ranger::backstrom) writes:
>     [...]Note that with an ISO 9660 CD mounted with F11CD, a PC accessing it
>     over PATHWORKS cannot run any applications that expect to use MSCDEX
>     to read the CD.
>     
>     For that you need an InfoServer or a PC/NetBIOS based CD-ROM sharing
>     program (Opti-Net, etc.).
>     
>     ...petri (petri.backstrom@ljo.mts.dec.com)
>        Personal Computing Integration Engineering
>        Digital Equipment Corporation

Where can I find Opti-Net? Fax or e-mail preferred.

TIA,
-- 
   Per Hogstedt               Internet:  hogstedt@plab.se
   Lindholmen Utveckling            or:  hogstedt@ae.chalmers.se
   P.O. Box 8714              Phone...:  +46 31 50 70 50
   S-402 75 Gothenburg        Fax.....:  +46 31 51 53 13
   Sweden                     MiniCall:  +46 74 35 68 49
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Pathworks vs Novell
From: "(JEFFERY CHEW NSEP-CIM, TEL:604-837211 EX 268, FAX604-833894)"<vccmep@GPO.NSC.COM>
Date: 11 Nov 1992 01:36:44 -0800
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Hi:
 
I distributed the letter posted by Migual to other sites of my company and
I got the feedback below.  Would appreciate if someone out there can help
and comment on his experience.
 
Rgds,
 
Jeffery Chew
VCCMEP%EPMV50.DNET@GPO.NSC.COM
**********************************
Pearl of the Orient.....
Penang, Malaysia.
**********************************
 
From:	SICFSB::KGLIM        11-NOV-1992 09:05:41.96
To:	ECCC::CLCHEP,EPMV50::VVIPEP
CC:	KGLIM,BNLIM
Subj:	Pathworks vs Novell PC integration at enterprise level
 
   I agreed with Miguel that Pathworks and Banyan are far more superior
than Novell in terms of WAN corporate wide networking as they have more
networking capabilities.
   However as a result of more features plus incorporation of decnet
into their network module , Pathworks is very memory intensive and
will eat up abt 300 - 400 Kbytes of physical memory which create a lot of
problems for SG when we try to network most of our PCs which comprise
of 8086/8088 PCs abt two years ago. Morever softwares such as Wordstar
and Freelance needs certain amount of free base memory before it can work
efficiently. Novell on the other hand eats up far less physical memory.
MS-DOS version 5.0 has resolved to a certain extent but still not
good enough the lack of base memory by allowing certain modules to be
installed into high mem.
    In terms of printing, Pathworks boast of able to print Freelance, Lotus
and other PC software files in LN03/LN06 DEClaser printer that are
connected to the terminal server but practically this is a bunch of
craps as the printing on these printer is extremely slow and we face
a lot of truncation problems related to it. DEC Singapore was
not able to help us on this and admit that the printing emulation
software (which DEC acquire from a third party) was not effective on this.
 
   Last - the server cost for Novell is much cheaper than a DEC VAXstation.
 
regards,
kglim
From: hodge@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Re: Windows for Workgroups
Date: 10 Nov 92 07:49:17 EST

In article <1992Nov9.120606.57@dmdscs.com>, jrkdmd@dmdscs.com (Joe Krulewicz) writes:
> Does anyone know if PATHWORKS is Compatible with Microsofts NEW
> Windows for workgroups?  I sure would like the peer to peer PC networking
> together with PATHWORKS
> 
> Thanks!
> jrkdmd@dmdscs.com

  We haven't been successful yet, but I expect to get everything working
when we install the new Pathworks for DOS upgrade.  This upgrade is
called (I think) Pathworks Upgrade for Lan Manager v2.1 and was documented
in DEC's "CSOupdate" in the August 24th issue.
  It will enable coexistance between DECnet and NETBEUI transports. (According
to dox.)

++++  Bob Hodge  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+  I'm looking for Jim Meerbot! Please email me if you know him!   +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Netware Coexistence question
From: MITCHELL@SPCMAIL.UTHSCSA.EDU
Date: 09 Nov 1992 08:42:59 -0600
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

I've just installed the Netware Coexistence package for the first time, with
PW 4.1 and DOS 5.0.  I'm functionally Novell-illiterate, but I can now get a
connection to a server using NET3 or NET4 (with the help of SETVER).  However
NET5, which I think is the appropriate version for DOS 5, simply hangs the
machine.  Does anyone recoginize the problem based on this minimal description?
 
Scott Mitchell
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
mitchell@uthscsa.edu, mitchell@uthscsa.bitnet
From: RBENAVIDEZ@INTEL7.INTEL.COM (Robert Benavidez, Fab 7 Software Engineer)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE:  Windows for Workgroups
Date: 9 Nov 92 18:38:11 GMT
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

>Does anyone know if PATHWORKS is Compatible with Microsofts NEW
>Windows for workgroups?  I sure would like the peer to peer PC networking
>together with PATHWORKS
 
>Thanks!
>jrkdmd@dmdscs.com
 
Hello!
 
	I for one would like to hear about others' experiences using
	PW and Windows for Workgroups.  I do not believe that WFW
	supports Pathworks 'out off the box' but I was able to get
	it to work by modifying my PW setup to use NDIS drivers,
	using the enhanced redirector, and manually editting
	my protocol.ini, startnet.bat, config.sys, and autoexec.bat.
	I am still not please with the overall results.  If anyone
	has been more successfull than myself I would like to hear
	about it.
 
Thanks,
Robert Benavidez
rbenavidez@intel7.intel.com
From: edb_gunder@debet.nhh.no
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: RE: Problems with PC and MAC sharing a file service
Date: 13 Nov 92 12:44:06 MET
Organization: Norwegian School of Economics

In article <00963760.61C83FE0.7017@VULCAN.CBA.OHIOU.EDU>, chiam@VULCAN.CBA.OHIOU.EDU (Ta Fuh Chiam) writes:
>>My question is: Does anybody know of a workaround to let the PC delete a
>>directory that is empty, but has subdirectories that the PC can not see
>>due to that the file names are to long?
>>
>>If there is not a workaround is not this a weak point in the integration
>>of PCs and Mac that DEC ought to fix, or is it just me that has such
>>problems?
>  
> There is no workaround that I know of. It is not a DEC or PATHWORKS problem. It
> is a limitation of DOS. DOS simply cannot handle file/directory name longer than
> 8 characters.
>  
> Ta Fuh Chiam
> ============================================================================
> Ta Fuh Chiam
> Ohio University, College of Business Administration / Phone: (614)593-2088
> Management Information Systems                        FAX:   (614)593-0319
> Copeland Hall 22                   INTERNET : chiam@vulcan.cba.ohiou.edu
> Athens, Ohio 45701, U.S.A.            or    : chiam@ouvaxa.ucls.ohiou.edu
>                                    BITNET   : CHIAM@OUACCVMB
>                           Use my first Internet address if at all possible.
> Disclaimer: What I have said are my opinions, not of anyone else.
> ============================================================================

Since several have answered my question in an other manner than I
thought of I will give a more precise description. I known about the
8+3 in DOS. But what I want is the PCFS server to delete all the SYSTEM
MSA directories assosiated with a user directory IF there is no USER files
in the directory, when I give the RD command from DOS. If there is USER
files that the PC can not see it is OK that it gives "Extended Error
65". 

I do not agree that the problem is a DOS problem, I think the problem
is the way DEC implements their integration products. I really can not
see the problem with implementing such a routine I mentioned in the
PCFS server. Because the PCFS server must in some way translate the DOS
command RD, to a RMS delete command. Why not put some testing in that
translation?

Gunder Soensteby
EDP-dept.
Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration
Norway
From: edb_gunder@debet.nhh.no
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: Re: Macintosh Client VMS UAM
Date: 11 Nov 92 18:11:32 MET
Followup-To: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Organization: Norwegian School of Economics

In article <fuhrman-021192134420@litmac13.epfl.ch>, fuhrman@litsun.epfl.ch (Cris Fuhrman) writes:
> 
> The UAM doesn't change the AppleShare icon in the Chooser (Selecteur pour
> les francophones). What it does change is how you "mount" a fileserver.
> Once you've selected a fileserver in the Chooser, and you click on the OK
> button (or double-click the server), you are presented with a dialog which
> asks you to "Select a logon method:" with two or more items in the list:
> Apple Standard UAMs or VMS Password UAMs.
> 

It does not work for me. I have the AppleShare Folder inside the System
Folder (System mappe) with the VMS UAM icon, but it does not ask me to
select a logon method. I am running MSA 1.1, VMS 5.5 and I have tried it
on a mac running 6.0.7 and a Mac running 7.0.1.

Any suggestions?


Gunder Soensteby
EDP-dept.
Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration 
Norway
From: dv@LUKE.SPU.EDU (Dennis Vanlandingham)
Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.desktop.pathworks
Subject: PathWorks DECnet and PathWorks TCP/IP
Date: 9 Nov 92 23:09:56 GMT
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Is it possible to set up PathWorks and use DECnet and TCP/IP
at the same time?  We just purchased PathWorks for DOS TCP/IP
version 2.0 and also have PathWorks for DOS 4.1.
 
I have them both working, but not at the same time.  Is it
possible?
 
I want to use LAT and TELNET with SETHOST, and FTP and access
our InfoServer 100 CD player.
 
You don't have the option to load LADCDDRV or MSCDEX in netsetup
when configuring for TCP/IP.
 
HELP, ANY IDEAS ???????????????????????????????????????????????
 
/*
          In real life:  Dennis Vanlandingham
                Campus:  Seattle Pacific University
          Phone/V-Mail:  (206)-281-2430
                   Fax:  (206)-281-2850
                E-Mail:  dv@luke.spu.edu
*/