HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga)
Subject: Re: 49ers/Cardinals
Organization: Stay Awake Software
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 92 00:37:01 GMT

<1992Nov2.013009.28080@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com> marshall@nebula.ssd.lmsc.lockheed.com said:
>The Phoenix Cardinals figured out how to shut down the 49ers' offense -
>don't let them have the ball.  

Actually, the Giants first "figured" that one out.

...
>To top it off, the 49ers' tackling was truly abyssmal, too.

Not to mention that Johnson ran like Okoye.

...
>Final score : Phoenix 24, 49ers 14
>
>The 49ers have no room to beef about this game. They came close to
>blowing games against the Rams and the Patriots, and this time they
>finally did it. In the 49ers scheme, the defense simply has to give
>the offense a chance to win the game, and they didn't do it today.

Yup.

>However, taking a step back and looking at the big picture, the 49ers
>are still 6-2, and if you had told me at the beginning of the season
>that they'd be 6-2 at this point I'd have taken it. No one else in the
>entire league seems to be dominating. 

Excuse me?  I can think of a couple: Dallas and Minnesota, with maybe
Pittsburgh thrown in.  Maybe you mean, "No one else is undefeated".

>                                      First it was the Bills, and they've
>since floundered. Then it was the Eagles, and they've fallen apart. Then
>it was the Dolphins, and they haven't even been able to handle the Colts
>and the Jets. And the 49ers have struggled to get by the Rams and Patriots
>and have now lost to the Cards. Now Dallas is the team to beat, which means
>they will probably be the next one to stumble, if the pattern continues.

True.  It's difficult to maintain a high level of play, especially in the
NFC East where you'll get beat if you slip just a bit.  but I think you
are shorting Minnesota.  They seem to be doing quite well.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Dallas is the only team with a winning record
that hasn't lost to a team with a losing record.


Gordon
-- 
The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
of whatever company you think I work for.  So there, thhhbbbt!
Message to Kodak:  Freedom for Dan Bredy.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lej@pdn.paradyne.com (Leo James)
Subject: Re: *** VOTE *** Hear ye, hear ye!
Organization: AT&T Paradyne, Largo, Florida
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 15:37:45 GMT

STEAL: '92 Draft

The steal of the '92 draft (according to "The Sporting News") was
the selection of Santana Dotson, by Tampa Bay,  in the 5th round.
He's currently on a pace to break Leslie O'Neal's  record of most
sacks by a rookie.  Not far behind, in my book,  is the selection
of NT Mark Wheeler in the 3rd.
--
+---------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
|Leopold E. James     | "A heart, a soul, AND | AT&T Paradyne         |
|ph: (813) 530-8425   |  a mind are terrible  | P.O. Box 2826, LG-132,|
|lej@pdn.paradyne.com |  things to waste."    | Largo, FL 34649 (USA) |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bderolf@encore.com (Brad DeRolf)
Subject: Re: Worst/Best Trades
Reply-To: bderolf@encore.com (Brad DeRolf)
Organization: Encore Computer Corp
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 18:00:19 GMT
News-Software: NN 6.4.16



This is easy:

Worst: Philly gets nothing for Keith Jackson.
Best:  Fins get Keith Jackson for nothing.

Wosrt: Bears trade Vestee Jackson for out of the NFL Eric Kummerow.
Best:  Vise versa

Worst: Broncos dump Booby Humphrie for Sammie (I'm hurting) Smith.
Best:  Vise Versa
Note:  If (Big if) Smith ever stay healthy.............we'll see.


hmm, Is Shula becoming a AL Davis?


Note: above from Miami Herald


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: BILLS #1
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Distribution: york
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 00:23:21 GMT

In article <1992Nov6.214312.8102@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca> fredg@ariel.yorku.ca (Fredrick Gonsalves) writes:
>
>
>
>ARE YOU READY TO ROCK
>ARE YOU READY TO ROLL
>ARE YOU READY FOR KELLY, THOMAS, REED AND THEIR BANG-BANG SHOW
>THE BILLS WILL KICK THE STEELERS SUNDAY NIGHT
>THE SCORE WILL BE 21-41 THAT'S RIGHT!!!!!!
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>FredG
>YorkU, Canada

Pleezeee! The Terminator's will break da Bills OL like
a deck of cards.  Who cares what the score will be. The
Steelers are primed to do some serious head-banging and
it will be Kelly's head getting banged. Wham! Bang! ZAP!!
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
"I do not think that winning is the most important thing. 
I think winning is the only thing."    - Bill Veeck
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: 2,000 yard rusher
Date: 9 Nov 92 19:54:43 GMT
Organization: University of Michigan

In article <92314.125028JJS158@psuvm.psu.edu> JJ Serowik <JJS158@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

   Seems to me that Emmitt is Without a Doubt, the best RB in the league!
   Seems to me, he singlehandedly(Sp?) whupped the Eagles D into a Coma by
   continually pounding them in the head! Seems to me, anyone who gains 163 yards
   agains a stingy Defense like the Eagles deserves it!  How many yards did Foster
   have that week?  And who were they playing?  Doesn't sound to me like Emmitt
   has any competition!  Thanx for the future flames:)

Agreed.  Emmitt is king stud #1, most importantly because he does it behind
such a low quality OL.

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
From: un032221@wvnvms.wvnet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Oilers
Date: 9 Nov 92 20:29:16 GMT
Organization: West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing

In article <1992Oct30.221138.25790@news.Hawaii.Edu>, bill@gaza.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (William J. King) writes:
> In article <94806@netnews.upenn.edu> yhl@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Yong "Stallion" Lee) writes:
>>
>>What do you people out there think about Ernest Givins's Electric Slide?
>>  I think that is the coolest endzone celebration ever.  Oilers should go to
>> the SB just for that.
>>
Actually, I hate it.  I loooks stupid, like he's having some sort of fit or
something.  There have been FAR better celebrations than this one,
unfortunately because of the No Fun League's policy, it is one of the few that
doesn't draw a flag.

> It is pretentious!
> 
> one should leave the endzone as though one had been there before and will be 
> there again.   a-la Jim Brown.
> 
	That's an individual thing.  The way Jim Brown, Art Monk, and barry
Sanders behave shows how classy they are, but you can't expect everyopne to be
like that.  It's like expecting everyone to devote their life to the
priesthood.  Sure, the priesthood is a good life serving people, but it's not
for everyone, and that is ok.
	Actually, I enjoyed the celebrations of old, the Ickey Shuffle, the Fun
Bunch, and all those were entertaining, and I looked forward to seeing what
people could come up with.  The Electric Slide is on the low end of this scale,
and if everyone did it, *I* might even ban celebrations.
	-Skins fan that loved the Fun Bunch, but hates Ryp
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pboxrud@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul D Boxrud)
Subject: Re: Koontz Computer Predictions - Week 11
Keywords: computer, picks, predictions
Organization: The Ohio State University
Distribution: rec
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 22:09:54 GMT

In article <1261@fozzy.UUCP> ckoontz@fozzy.UUCP (Carl H. Koontz) writes:
>Well, I should have known that as soon as I made my picks public I would have
>a bad week. I was 6-8 last week bringing my yearly total to a still impressive
>89-37.
>
>Here are my picks for Week 11:
>

>[other teams deleted]

>Philadelphia  3
>Green Bay    38
>
>Comments welcome.
>
>Carl

Cool!

Paul
From: bittle@niktow.canisius.edu (Jason Bittle)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Indoor vs. Outdoor (was Re: WIZARD PREDICTIONS!!!!!!!!!!!)
Summary: okey! corrections!
Date: 10 Nov 92 18:04:22 GMT
Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo NY. 14208

In article <1992Nov9.162203.2306@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>, nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna) writes:

> Cowboys: Indoor

sorta.  It's a retractible dome, with a little slice left in the middle (so
that it can never be totally closed.)  Only in Texas .. :-)

> Falcons: Outdoors

Not anymore.  They play in the new Georgia Dome.  

> Pats:  Outdoor (I think they moved from a domed to 
>         a grass field last year)

The Pats have always been an outdoor team.  The Falcons recently moved indoor,
and that's who you may be thinking 'bout..

-- 
ciao,                             
Jason Bittle (bittle@canisius.edu) 
(a.k.a. Pillsbury Dough Boy )
From: dmercer@oracle.com (David Mercer)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Playoff schedule & tie-breakers
Date: 10 Nov 92 22:51:52 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: Oracle Corp., Belmont CA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
              at Oracle Corporation.  The opinions expressed are those
              of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.


Let me see if I've got this right.

6 teams in each conference make the playoffs: the three
division champions and three wildcards.  I'll call them
DC1-3, where DC1 is the best division champion, and DC3 is
the worst, and WC1-3, where WC1 is the best wildcard team
and WC3 is the worst.

The teams are seeded as follows:
	1. DC1
	2. DC2
	3. DC3
	4. WC1
	5. WC2
	6. WC3

It should be noted that one or more wildcard teams may or
may not have a better record than any of the division
champions, but they are still ranked lower.  Am I correct?

DC1 ----------.
               \_________
WC1            /         \
    \_________/           \
    /                      \
WC2                         >---------
                           /
DC2 ----------.           /
               \_________/
DC3            /
    \_________/
    /
WC3

Playoff Round 1:

WC3 @ DC3 (we'll call this Game 1)
WC2 @ WC1 (we'll call this Game 2)

DC1 & DC2 have first-round byes.

Playoff Round 2:

winner of Game 1 @ DC2 (Game 3)
winner of Game 2 @ DC1 (Game 4)

Playoff Round 3:

winner of Game 3 @ winner of Game 4 (Conference Championship)

Was my guess correct?  Or do they decide home & away based
on the teams involved (ie. the higher-ranked team plays at
home)?

And how are tie-breaks made:

1. Record
2. Division record
:
:
n. Coin toss

What are the criteria between 3 and n-1?

And finally, how are ties resolved in a playoff game?  I
assume a tie in the superbowl stands, but in the playoffs, a
tie cannot---there MUST be a winner.  Is this done by
coin-toss?

Thanks.

---David B. Mercer
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Bengals beat Bears.  was (Re: BROWNS SUCK HARD!!)
From: saji@hagar.ece.uc.edu (Sandeep  Aji)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 19:42:26 GMT
Organization: Unversity of Cincinnati, ECE Dept
Originator: saji@hagar.ece.uc.edu


In article <1992Nov9.10307.27973@ms.uky.edu>, thomasc@ms.uky.edu (Thomas Campbell) writes:
|> In article <BxBwns.C0q@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> whitesel@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dan Whitesell). writes:
|> >In article <92310.231326RK0VSANU@MIAMIU.BITNET> writes:
|> >weather Bengals 13-10 edge Breach.  Also Harbaugh will have bad day sacked
|> 
|> Man, this guy is incredible! :)  You picked the right guy to win the game.. :)
|> Even if you did fuck up the score and his name.. :)  (It's Breech) :)  But,
|> regarldess............. ONE HELL OF A GAME!!!!   
|> 
|> alex
|> 
|> p.s. Boomer still sucks... Green and Pickens won the game.
|> 

   Well I do not think Boomer did too bad in the last 2 games. He is 
   zipping the ball much better than he did few weeks back. He still has 
   a great arm. I saw him zip the ball effortlessly for 45-50 yards 
   during Bengals-Browns half time warmup. I mean come on ... this 
   man has lost one of his primary receivers for the season. He is playing 
   with a very inexperienced offensive line and most of the receivers in 
   the Bengals line-up are playing their first season with the Bengals. 
   (Pickens, Brennan, Query, Craig Thompson (TE) ).

   He had 172 yards in yesterdays game and 3 TD's. Of which he can take credit 
   for 2 (Craig Thompson and Carl Pickens). Agreed Pickens caught a great 
   catch, but the ball was as perfect as it could have been. And that too after 
   he(Boomer) was beaten up on the previous drive. The man is a fighter and 
   if this team will go anywhere it will only be Boomer who can take them there.

   Next Sunday will be an interesting match-up. Nagle looks like a QB which can
   give our secondary nightmares. Then again which NFL QB can't burn our
   secondary ..........And how about that Jets running game ... seems
   like it is picking up. They ran for about 160 yards against the Broncos on 
   grass. Though the Bengals have been strong against the run ... they are 
   pathetic against 3rd and long passing situations. Soemtimes I wonder why 
   opposing teams don't just ground the ball on first 2 downs and try converting
   on 3rd and 10 :-) Any thoughts on Bengals- Jets game ?? 

    Yesterday the biased ESPN coverage sucked. They made it seem as if the Bears
   were playing by themselves. It was sick. I wonder if anyone else felt that 
   way?

   Aji

   Go Bengals !!!

  ps. Hey Ditka ... we didn't even have to go to 250 NW Drive (or wherever his
      office is) ... we whipped Ur **** in Soldier Field.


-- 
  | 	Sandeep A. Aji			| saji@thor.ece.uc.edu      |
  |     University of Cincinnati   	| saji@hagar.ece.uc.edu     |
  |        FINAL FOUR 1992              | 	                    |
  |                                     | 			    |
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ric@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (ricardo.g.irvin)
Subject: Re: Best/Worst in Franchise History
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: usa
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 18:16:59 GMT
Summary: "...,and watch the GIANTS play football."
Keywords: Giants, Cardinals

In article <1992Nov11.141542.11021@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> erk@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (eric.r.kierstead) writes:
>My teams are the Giants & Cardinals...
>
>GIANTS Worsts:
>
>ALL TIME WORST:Taking Rocky Thompson in the 1st round of the '71 draft.
>Near All Time Worst: Letting Tarkenton go back to the Vikes, '72.
>Honorable Mention: Signing washed-up Larry Csonka, '75.
		    drafting Butch Wolfolk.
>Lowest Point in franchise history: THE FUMBLE, 1978
>
>GIANTS Bests:
>
>*Signing unknow Bill Parcells as head coach, 1982.
>
>*Signing "washed-up" Ottis Anderson, 1986.
>
>*Getting "washed-up" Tony Galbraith, 1984.
>
Drafting LT, Harry Carson, and George Martin.
WORST: the  team that picked George Rogers over LT 8{D.

			RIC. IRVIN
			AT&T BELL LABORATORIES.

"TOUCHDOWN !!!! ... just kidding Dad! " my son at 18 months.

"In football, good hitting usually beats good pitching."

"... Lawrence Taylor was all over him... like syrup on pancakes." John Madden.

"...This Game is being broadcast in stereo..." Pat Summerall.
"...What does spit sound like in stereo? "	John Madden.

			PEACE.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: nitin@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Nitin Khanna)
Subject: Re: Bills in 1st..suprise,surprise
Organization: Houses of the Holy
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 92 22:24:03 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.172532.8855@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>, iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Imran Qureshi) writes:
> In <MITCHELL.92Nov3150635@ishmael.linus.mitre.org> mitchell@linus.mitre.org (Richard B. Mitchell) writes:
> 
> 
> >In article <1992Nov3.183621.16095@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> iqrh_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Imran Qureshi) writes:
> 
> Miami in first but you can look at it another way.  The Bills play the Fish
> on MNF.  As long as they both win or both lose, the teams will be tied.  So no
> matter who has the official tiebreaker now, the winner of that game will be   
> in sole possession of 1st place.  Until then, each team can consider itself
> in "1st" place because they each control their own destiny.


This is warped thinking and strange logic; even for rsfp. 


-- 
Nitin Khanna.  I Teach Eunuchs - I mean Unix.
Go Bulls, Bears, Broncos, Blackhawks.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: rmcghee@fnma.com(Rich McGhee)
Subject: Re: ***** SB - MVP *****
Reply-To: rmcghee@fnma.com
Organization: Fannie Mae
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 21:28:19 GMT

In article <1992Nov5.152159.14530@bcrka451.bnr.ca> srs@bnr.ca (Shailesh  
Sutarwala) writes:
> 
> 
> Can someone recall who was the MVP for the last Super Bowl ?
I am pretty sure it Mark Rypien.
--
Cheers,

Rich McGhee
Advanced Technology
Federal National Mortgage Association
3900 Wisconsin Avenue, 4S-2H
From: vjrao@leland.Stanford.EDU (Venodhar Julapalli Rao)
Subject: Re: Oilers playoff hopes
Keywords: NFL, Oilers, Playoffs
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Distribution: rec
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 92 02:03:38 GMT

In article <1267@fozzy.UUCP> ckoontz@fozzy.UUCP (Carl H. Koontz) writes:
>It's about time for the Oilers to get moving if they hope to secure a
>playoff spot this season.  From all I've heard the team is on the verge
>of absolute disintegration.  Hopefully, Warren Moon and the team can regain
>their focus and remember what they do for a living.
>
>The Oilers have three consecutive big road games coming up against
>Minnesota, Miami, and Detroit.  I don't see any way the Oilers can win
>the AFC Central without victories in all three.  The chances of winning
>a division with two divisional home losses are low enough as it is.
>
>The Oilers should make the playoffs if they can win two of the three
>road games.  A 7-5 record playing well on the road should be able to get
>them to 10-6 which should be enough in the AFC this season (see AFC West).
>
>Losing two of the three means shake up the house and try again in 93.
>
>The one thing the Oilers have in their favor is they have not played an
>NFC opponent yet this year.  The Oilers do very well against the NFC.  I
>think it has something to do with the way they always play to the level of
>their competition.
>
>Until last week against Cleveland, the Oilers had been in every game so the
>5-3 record wasn't too disheartening but now who knows.
>
>Knowing the Oilers, nothing will suprise me.  They could finish anywhere
>between 5-11 and 12-4.
>
>Other opinions?
>
>Carl
>ckoontz@rdxsun40.aud.alcatel.com
>
>BTW, the picks were just to see if our posts were getting out to the world.

I don't think the Oilers do well at all against the NFC...last year they went
1-3 -- granted, they lost to the Redskins on a missed FG by Ian Howfield, but
the Cowboys -- the one team they did beat -- were deep in Oiler territory
during overtime before Emmit Smith fumbled the ball...

Plus the Oilers went 1-3 against the NFC West 2 years ago...

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: swleon01@vulcan.spd.louisville.edu (Stephen W. Leon)
Subject: Re: John Taylor
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 22:21:45 GMT
Organization: University of Louisville

In <1992Nov12.142921.29094@mlb.semi.harris.com> mdh@mlb.semi.harris.com (Mark Hanson) writes:

>John Taylor got moved to the practice squad.
>The next step is activation to the team.
>I believe he will definitely play next week.
>If he is going to play this week, they will 
>probably not make a decision until Saturday
>or Sunday. Bummer, huh. Guess all you FFL'ers
>out there have a big decision to make this week.


>Good Luck


     Well, after hearing he might be playing this week, I'm gonna be glued 
     to my TV this weekend, to see if there are any updates.  If he is probable,     I'll start him!!!

     Stephen Leon
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Most Underrated Players.
Date: 9 Nov 1992 18:21:00 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

 I'd have to put Sterling Sharpe at the top of the list. Next to Jerry Rice,
 he's the best receiver in the NFL and nobody's heard of him. Maybe with 61
 catches for 907 yard in nine games, he'll start to get noticed.

 --salty
From: jdhl@troi.cc.rochester.edu (papa_sm00sh)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Koontz Computer Predictions - Week 11
Keywords: computer, picks, predictions
Date: 11 Nov 92 15:54:47 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York

In <1261@fozzy.UUCP> ckoontz@fozzy.UUCP (Carl H. Koontz) writes:

>Well, I should have known that as soon as I made my picks public I would have
>a bad week. I was 6-8 last week bringing my yearly total to a still impressive
>89-37.

Of course anyone can have a bad week... but since i am one who
critiqued earliere, let me also try talking now BEFORE i know the
results.

>Here are my picks for Week 11:

>Detroit  10
>Pittsburgh  9

I still think Detroit's rating is way too high based on last year's
performance... I say Pitt by 9

>LA Rams  27
>Dallas   23

The Rams over Dallas? You've got to be kidding... Dallas by 12

>Philadelphia  3
>Green Bay    38

When did Green Bay's offense get going and when did Philly's defense
get *that* bad.  Philly by 4

>Phoenix  30
>Atlanta  51

puhlease... Phoenix by 5 [ i put the over-under at 28 not 81]

>Washington  3
>Kansas City 6

Yes, and no... low scoring game, probably, but i don't think *that*
low... Washington has been managin to kick some long field goals and
should score at least 12... Kansas 17, Wash 12

>Cincinnati  34
>NY Jets     9

Tough to call.  Two very erratic teams... I think the home team will
win by 4... is NYJ home team here?

>Houston    3
>Minnesota 51

NOT!... how about Minn 34, Hous 28

>New England  24
>Indianapolis 21

NO-ONE loses to N.E.  Indy by 12

>San Diego  28
>Cleveland  27

Charger Defense won't let the browns get close... but the charger
offense won't let them pull away either... it could be close, but I
say San Diego by 4 [over-under at 38]

>Chicago    24
>Tampa Bay  21

good call... i agree

>New Orleans  13
>San Francisco 31

same here... 49ers big... IMHO N.O. is not the powerhouse their fans
are touting them as.

>Seattle    3
>LA Raiders 31

Seattle defense is better than that... Raiders by 6 [over-under at 27]

>NY Giants  27
>Denver      3

right winner, but not by that margin... how about Giants by 12
[over-under at 36]

>Buffalo    38
>Miami      17

miami will keep it close but i think they will lose. Buff 31, Miami 27


Now we can see how well my well tuned brain does against the computer
predictions... I will keep a copy of my list on hand so i can check
and see how i did... interestingly enough, i have never actually
written down my gfuesses and checked them that way... usually i've
relied on my memory to tewll me who i predicted...

jason
From: aa719@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Stan M. Mangrum)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Browns News - Nov 6th (Oiler preview)
Date: 9 Nov 1992 01:05:49 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aa719@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Stan M. Mangrum)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, mocnik@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com () says:

>5. Prediction:
>   The Oilers are favored by 11 points. They got beat last week and are trailing
>   the Steelers by 2 games. They need a win and they will get it. This game has
>   the making of a blowout. Moon will have a field day passing for 300+ yards.
>   Lorenzo White, also will have a good day. Thus the score should be something
>   like 38-13. Webster Slaughter should also get a TD.
>
>   The Oilers are just too talented, plus the Browns once again are playing on
>   the carpet. They are 1-12 in the last 13 games on the carpet. Their 2
>   worst games of the year have been on the carpet. They just aren't quick
>   enough.

Cleveland 24, Houston 14.

'Nuff said.

St.
-- 
Stan M.Mangrum, Assistant Sysop     | "And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, 
CFN Collectibles SIG / Comics FORUM |  do all in the name of the Lord Jesus,
INET : aa719@cleveland.freenet.edu  |  giving thanks to God and the Father by
[BROWNS, CAVS....& INDIANS IN '92!] |  him."               - Colossians 3:17