HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: hafting@Lise.Unit.NO (Helge Hafting)
Subject: Re: OS2 and Soundblaster
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 11:54:18 GMT

In article <9209031148.AA23388@tortoise.cis.ohio-state.edu>, brown-sh@news.cis.ohio-state.edu (shawn c brown) writes:
 > 	I'm thinking about upgrading my machine to OS2.  Is it just some
 > games that have trouble with Soundblaster (in OS2 mode) or do they all not
 > work???
 > 
 > Shawn Brown
There are some games that have trouble with os/2 itself.
The soundblaster works fine, but make sure that it
uses an unique irq and an unique dma channel, and that nothing else falls
in the same i/o adress space.

If you try to run something else in parallell with the game, you risk that
the game might become a little slow due to multitasking.  This is usually
no problem, but it is easy to hear it if the sound is delayed.

 
-- 
 |  |      ^         |  |      /   ^   o
 |__| _   /|  _  _   |__| _   /|  /|   |    _   _
 |  |/_| / | / \/_|  |  |/ | /-+-/-+- /| /|/ | / \
 |  |\__/  |/\_/\_   |  |\_|/  |   \_/ |/ |  |/\_/
            __/                /              __/
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Out of memory error. 6M left though. HELP!
Date: 26 Aug 92 19:11:53 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Aug25.124051@axion.bt.co.uk> djackson@axion.bt.co.uk (Dave Jackson) writes:
>Yes, I can verify this - I had the same problem with the new kernel -
>this was confirmed as a bug by the IBM help people in the UK. A fix
>is unlikely before the release of OS/2 2.1 or whatever it's going to
>be called,

It's going to be called OS/2 2.0, with some CSD revision number.
Version 2.1 (whenever it comes out) will add more functionality to the
system, not fix bugs in the old functions.

>however watch software.watson.ibm.com as they could be wrong !

Always look there.  I ftp in once a week to check for new things.  The
latest ones (that interested me) are:

boot20.zip - make boot floppies from an installed system

pmtree.zip - Generate a tree of all open windows and window objects on
             the screen.


-- 
   |)  David Charlap           "I don't even represent myself
  /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu   sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
 ((|,)
  ~|~  Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
From: stanton@haas.berkeley.edu (Richard Stanton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: REXX script to open single application with non-default font size?
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 23:08:51 GMT
Organization: Haas School of Business, U.C. Berkeley
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: connor.berkeley.edu

Has anyone written such a script? While I'm happy enough with the default 
font size for most applications, sometimes I'd like to be able to have a
particular application open with a different font. This seems to be a job 
for REXX, but as I know none, I'd really appreciate anyone who has already 
done this posting the results.

Thanks a lot

Richard Stanton
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: pathak@mitre.org (Heeren Pathak)
Subject: Re: Registering OS/2
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.misc
Organization: Mitre Corporation
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 15:21:03 GMT

In article <GHENNIGA.92Aug25214309@ampere.ampere>, ghenniga@NMSU.Edu wrote:
> 
> If the past is any indication the registration does little for you. In my
> case I had a registered copy of OS/2 1.3 and what IBM does is send you a
> form telling you that the upgrade is available and to receive it send
> in a "Proof of License" card that they distribute with their software.
> 

I don't think the past is going to indicate the future.  The reason IBM had
to use the "Proof of License" card bit was that they didn't have in their
database a list of pre v1.3 users.  So they decided to make everyone send
in their Proof of License card.  From talking with people, this mistake
probably won't be repeated.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heeren Pathak                      | Millions long for immortality who do 
pathak@mitre.org                   | not know what to do with themselves
Mitre Corporation                  | on a rainy Sunday afternoon.
(617) 271-7465                     |	               	-- Susan Ertz
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Mine not Mitre's.
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Changing the damn icons (and a lockup question!)
Date: 2 Sep 92 20:04:47 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Sep2.172143.26791@usl.edu> das9674@usl.edu (Stephenson Daniel A) writes:
>In article <1992Sep1.184400.1899@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> pprior@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Paul A Prior) writes:
>>Also, HOW DO I CHANGE THE ICON FOR A SELECTION!!!???  Such a stupid
>>question, I know, but I have all these icons and cant get it to change
>>them.
>
>What I do is open the icon view of the directory the icon files are in.
>(From the 'Drives' folder)  I click on an icon to bring up the ICON EDITOR
>for it.  I Select All, and then Copy it.  I close down that icon editor.
>Then, I bring up the icon editor for the object whose icon I wish to change.
>I Click 'paste' from the Edit menu, and voila, it gets changed.  You save
>normally, and it is done.
>
>Yeah, it is cumbersome, but it works.

There's an easier way.  Open up the settings notebook for the object
you want to change.  Go to the last page ("General").  Click on
"Find...", pick your .ico file, and OK it.  Find works the same way as
always.  It'll look for icons in this case.

>>Also - is there a way to "migrate" or install a new program without
>>going through the migrate icon.  Doing so makes me scan the entire
>>disk (400MB) for programs when I already know the directory I want.
>
>I wih I knew.  I wish I could just 'tell' the computer where is was!

If the program isn't in the database, you can just drag a "program"
template from the templates folder and fill in the appropriate fields
on the first two pages. 

You can do this for programs in the database as well, but the DOS
settings will be system defaults instead of the values in the
database. 
-- 
   |)  David Charlap           "TELEPHONE, n.  An Invention of the devil which
  /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu   abrogates some of the advantages of making a
 ((|,)                          disagreeable person keep his distance."
  ~|~                              --- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: ignacij@meishan.animal.uiuc.edu (Ignacy Misztal)
Subject: Re: Disk Performance Questions
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 13:49:13 GMT

eletanjm@nuscc.nus.sg (TAN JIN MENG) writes:

>: 2 Will conversion to HPFS significantly increase raw performance? I know
>:   about less fragmentation etc. but will I *feel* the difference?

>Yes - I think so.

>: 
>: 3 It seems to me that OS/2 is just doing more than DOS, e.g. keeping
>:   EA's and peeking all files while you open up a folder etc. This means
>:   that raw disk performance will ever be less than DOS. Am I correct?
>: 
>Under HPFS, your EA's are kept together with the file instead of in a
>separate file (as in FAT). Access to the EA + file is thus faster.
......
>: 
>: 5 Should I look to FAT disks under OS/2 as just a downward compatibility
>:   tool or as a serious alternative to HPFS?
>: 
>Another feature of HPFS - more fault tolerence.

>jin meng

In my case, HPFS is faster accessing many small files, slower accessing
one file, and much less secure than FAT, at least with the current 
drivers. From time to time one of my files on the HPFS partition gets
corrupted (chkdsk /f does not detect it), and any access to that file
freezes the system. The current HPFS fixes helped a little bit, but not quite.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ignacy Misztal			E-mail: ignacy@uiuc.edu
University of Illinois		Phone: (217) 244-3164
1207 W. Gregory Dr.
Urbana, IL 61801
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: bataller@dogie.macc.wisc.edu (Erik Bataller)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Western Digital FaSst 7000/Future Domain SCSI Drivers
Date: 23 Aug 92 20:08:14 GMT
Distribution: comp.os.os2.misc
Organization: University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center

Hello,
	I am trying to figure out how to make OS/2 recognize my Western
digital Fasst 7000 SCSI adapter.  It used the init13 driver by default
for my installation.  It works but is slow.  I tried using the FD16-700.add
in conjunction with both the dasddrv.dmd and the OS2scsi.dmd.  I have been 
unsuccesful.  Would anyone have any ideas?

thanks 
Erik

Internet: Bataller@macc.wisc.edu
Bitnet: Bataller@wiscmacc.bitnet

o
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: ckermit as external protocol...
From: logic@gacvx2.gac.edu
Date: 3 Sep 92 09:18:13 -0600
Organization: Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, Minnesota

hi,                                                                            

Has anybody been able to get the OS/2 port of cke? I've bee trying with little
success..

regards,
al hart

an external protocol under an OS/2 comm program..  I've been trying with little

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: gruen@ipc1.rrzn.uni-hannover.de (Lutz Grueneberg)
Subject: Re: OS2 TO SUN
Reply-To: gruen@ipc1.rrzn.uni-hannover.de
Organization: University of Hannover
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 22:03:45 GMT

In article <14761.1321.uupcb@compart.fi>, mike.walsh@compart.fi (Mike Walsh)  writes:
|> Now for the follow-up:
|> We need probably to do this connection to a remote SUN. I get the
|> impressions TCP/IP can handle this, is this true and are there
|> any problems with remote connection.
Yes, the answer is the SLIP protocol. But pay attention: not all SLIP's
can talk which each other. I've never tested SLIP between SUN's and
OS/2 machines.

|> One question that comes to mind is will we need some form of
|> X-Windows emulation on the OS/2 side ? Answers to this and any questions
|> I've not posed gratefully accepted.
IBM offers PMX, a X11-Server for their TCP/IP. The older releases I've
seen could only use the PM as Window Manager. So no olwm and XNews for
now.

Lutz
-- 
// Lutz Gr"uneberg
// Lehrgebiet Rechnernetze und Verteilte Systeme
// Universit"at Hannover
// Schlosswender Str. 5
// D-3000 Hannover 1, Germany
//
// Email: Grueneberg@rrzn.uni-hannover.dbp.de
//
//				... have a  n.i.c.e. day


Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: laird@stable.ecn.purdue.edu (Kyler Laird)
Subject: Northgates (and others) won't install OS/2 2.0!
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: 24 Aug 92 00:16:54 GMT

Harsh reality hit last week when I tried to upgrade my depatrment's
network from OS/2 1.3 and MS LAN Manager 2.0 to OS/2 2.0 and IBM
LAN Server 2.0 (Advanced).

The Northgate (Elegance 333 - 386DX-33) server won't access the A:
drive during the second part of installation (after reboot, when
it says "insert disk 6 in drive A:").  It didn't lock, didn't give
an error message, just kept asking for the disk and beeping (and
redisplaying the message) when I hit "OK".

BTW, I tried it on another Northgate (386SX-20 Slimline) and got
the same result.

I used two different OS/2 copies and have successfully installed
OS/2 2.0 on a Gateway 2000 486, Zenith 386 and Dell 386SX laptop. 

After many calls to IBM (and a couple of days of waiting), I restored
the network to its previous state.  Then I received a call from yet
another IBM tech (by mistake - long story).  I decided to go ahead
and tell him about my problem even though it was in queue for an
engineer.

Strangely enough, he said that it was common, they knew about it,
and they didn't have a fix!  So here I was beating myself up for
three days trying to solve a known problem that doesn't have a 
solution!  (But no one I had talked to could find any record of
any similar problem!)

Just wanted everyone else to know about this.  Maybe it will save
some head/heartache...

--kyler
From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: EA DATA. SF file size
Date: 26 Aug 92 19:50:33 GMT
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.

In article <1992Aug25.210634.143339@zeus.calpoly.edu> jemenake@zeus.calpoly.edu (Joe Emenaker) writes:
>In article <1992Aug25.192458.21679@ni.umd.edu> dan@ni.umd.edu (Dan Burns) writes:
>>
>>I have a PS/2 Model 80 with a 330 meg hard disk the with over 250 megs of
>>disk space used (mostly old dos stuff), that I have OS/2 installed on using
>>a FAT system and dual-boot.  My EA_DATA._SF is over 11 Meg in size right now
>>(11059200 byte).  Is this normal?  At home I have a 35 meg HPFS system and
>>140 Meg FAT system (on the same disk), and the file is just over 110K.
>>
>>Is something wrong here?  I am using kernal revision 6.311 dated 92/05/14.
>
>Well, my understanding is that the EA_DATA file has the extended attributes
>for the FILES on your hard disk, so the size should be more proportional to
>the NUMBER of files on your HD rather than their total size. On my machine,
>I've got about 2000 files and my EA_DATA is a little over a meg. That comes
>to about 500 bytes per file. Sounds reasonable since I heard that the
>EA_DATA is used to store the icons from your OS/2 and Windows EXEs.    

If you decided to "pretty-up" your desktop by attaching icons to most
things, creating migrated icons for apps, shadowing things, storing
different fonts for different folders, etc, you're going to see this
effect.  Each WPS-parameter you store (like DOS settings) are stored
in EA's.  When you open a window for the first time, EA's are created
for it and all the programs (icons) within it in order to remember the
window's position, size, and the position of the icons within it.
-- 
   |)  David Charlap           "I don't even represent myself
  /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu   sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
 ((|,)
  ~|~  Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.misc:28893 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:12120
From: cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us (gordon hlavenka)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Why not OS/2 ???? Hmmmmmm
Date: 1 Sep 92 15:07:24 GMT
Organization: Vpnet Public Access


 gunthar@milton.u.washington.edu (Johannes) writes:
>Hey I don't understand why more people don't want to get there hands on OS/2
>so maybe right now you don't think you want it right now. 

I've really given OS/2 a chance, but it has disappointed me.  The
video drivers stink (they're only beta, but...), it doesn't run my
software, it's slow, and it blows up often.

>but how does 20 dollars sound to get yourself a copy.

That's only about a dollar a disk.  I can buy blank HD floppies for
less, and I don't have to cut the notches.  That's getting close,
though (plus with those disks you get a cardboard storage box.
Hmmm...)

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Gordon S. Hlavenka           cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us
  Don't forget:  Dave Barry/Joe Walsh in November!
From: stanton@haas.berkeley.edu (Richard Stanton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Can I delete 400K EA... file from drive D: (all DOS programs)?
Date: 28 Aug 1992 16:52:46 GMT
Organization: Haas School of Business, U.C. Berkeley
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: connor.berkeley.edu

My drive D: contains only DOS programs. However, I see there is a 400K EA...
file in the root directory. This seems rather large, since none of the files
should need any extended attributes.

Can I just delete the file? If there might be problems with doing this, is 
there another way to shrink it? (By the way, CHKDSK /F didn't change 
anything)

Thanks for any suggestions

Richard Stanton
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: branham@binah.cc.brandeis.edu (Tom Branham, Biophysics Grad. Brandeis)
Subject: Re: Various OS/2 2.0 problems
Reply-To: branham@binah.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 14:44:28 GMT

I have been happy so far with my Maxtor 7213 200Meg 15ms ~$500 drive (IDE).
And OS/2 has not had any troubles with it so far :) (and despite what I
have seen posted here about not being able to find one, although I had
to call around a few places, I ordered mine and got it the next day :)
                                ......Tom Branham
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: mtsjej@gsusgi2.gsu.edu (cat_walker)
Subject: cache vs. diskcache
Organization: Georgia State University
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 03:33:39 GMT

hello...i am new to os2 am getting confused on the
CACHE vs. DISKCACHE commands...and also the CACHE used in the 
IFS command.......could someone please explain the differences
in these....also any parameter suggestions are welcome....
i have 486/50 with 8mg ram and 230mg drive.....



                                                  thanks,
                                                  jeff
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: jedwards@ms.uky.edu (Jonathan Edwards)
Subject: Re: How do I make OS/2 wait for my HD to spin up?
    <1992Sep3.180127.12516@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 19:38:56 GMT
Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences

grichard@swimming.cis.ohio-state.edu (Golden Richard III) writes:

>On a related note, does anyone know of 386SL notebooks whose suspend
>mode works under OS/2?  Or is there an inherent problem that prevents
>this sort of thing from working?

The suspend mode on IBM's laptops and notebooks is supposed to work fine
under OS/2, although you do need to be sure you have the most recent
reference diskettes.  You probably also need to muck with CONFIG.SYS to
install the appropriate power management device drivers...
From: jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: windows 3.1 support
Date: 27 Aug 1992 15:02:35 GMT
Organization: UT Health Science Center Houston

In article <1992Aug27.103254.17594@actrix.gen.nz> Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes:
>Apparently, the
>Win3.1 support in the CSD will support Win3.1 *and* all Win3.0 programs
>INCLUDING THOSE THAT CAN'T RUN UNDER MS WIN3.1.
>In other words: a better Windows than Windows.

...but then, we knew that already.

-- 
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu      | adequately be explained by stupidity.
 "Keep in mind that Amateur Radio As We Know It Today will cease to exist
            at midnight tonight." -- Dave Newkirk, WJ1Z
From: liuyu@kramden.nyu.edu (Liuyu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS2 doesn't support Hercules? SYS 0355?? what is it?
Date: 27 Aug 92 04:48:28 GMT
Organization: New York University

sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:

>Unfortunately not.  IBM's way of saying that color is a "good thing,"
>I suppose.

>However, there are some extremely cheap options open to you.  One is
>to acquire either an ATI EGA Wonder card or a Paradise Monochrome EGA
>card.  I've seen both at around $25 now (in such publications as The
>Processor).  One way to get ahold of one is to post a want ad in the
>appropriate newsgroup.  Since this card will emulate EGA color modes
>on a TTL monochrome monitor you can keep your monitor and run OS/2 in
>EGA mode.

>The other way is to jump to VGA.  Monochrome VGA setups are not much
>more than $100 for both monitor and card now.  Color is certainly
>under $300.

>Lastly, I encourage you to call IBM at their support number and put in
>a request for a Hercules driver.  Granted, Hercules isn't state of the
>art, but I agree with you that it should still be supported.  (CGA is,
>after all.)

Thanks for the options I can have. But I'm switching to DV or Windows. 
It is a real shame that IBM doesn't support a standard hardware like Hercules.
If IBM doesn't start supporting other vendors' hardwares, I don't think vendors
will support OS/2. 
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
Subject: Re: how use >1024 Zyl. HD
Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 23:11:32 GMT

In article <LBURGESS.92Sep2145623@yosemite.glacier.sim.es.com> lburgess@glacier.sim.es.com (Lewis Burgess) writes:
>I don't have sector translation and I looked through the FAQ and couldn't find
>out how OS/2 supports more than 1024 with restrictions.  Does anyone out there
>know how OS/2 does this and what restrictions there are?

Apparently the restrictions are as follows:

(1) FAT cannot reach beyond cylinder 1024;
(2) the first HPFS volume cannot reach beyond cylinder 1024.

Also, some people report difficulty using OS/2 2.0's FDISK to
partition disks with more than 1024 cylinders.  I don't know enough
about this problem to comment on it.  Thoughts, anyone?

-- 
Timothy F. Sipples      | The OS/2 FREQ. ASKED QUESTIONS LIST is avail. from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/faq.
Dept. of Econ., Univ.   | Or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP").
of Chicago, 60637       | Family Values Means a Job
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
From: cnadler@vnet.ibm.com (Cliff Nadler)
Subject: Re: Multiple Desktops....
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 92 12:43:12 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.11 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: cnadler@vnet.ibm.com (Cliff Nadler)
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research

In  <1992Sep3.020531.5312@nuscc.nus.sg>  eletanjm@nuscc.nus.sg (TAN JIN MENG) writes:
> 
> how would you (conveniently) use it. Can you easily specify a different
> desktop on bootup?

Well, if you made workarea folders for each "user configuration", and populated
them with shadows from a hidden, main folder, then changed the main OS/2 2.0
desktop to have just the folder objects for each user configuration, then the
only thing you'd have to do is to make sure everyone closed their workarea
and selected shutdown from the main desktop before powering off the system.

That's it in theory, I haven't tried it yet, becuase I'm the only one using
my system at this time. <g>

--
Cliff Nadler (cnadler@vnet.ibm.com)
IBM Federal Systems Company - TEAM OS/2

Disclaimer: This post represents the views of the poster, not IBM Corporation.
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: cnadler@vnet.ibm.com (Cliff Nadler)
Subject: Re: OS/2 Win3.1 support *better* than MS!
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 13:31:11 GMT
News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.037 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
Reply-To: cnadler@vnet.ibm.com (Cliff Nadler)
Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research

In  <1992Aug28.044505.2361@news.Hawaii.Edu>  tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen) writes:
> Steve Withers writes:
> 
> Another case in point is memory boards for PS/2s.  IBM says that the system
> maximum memory for a Model 70-A21 is 16 Mbytes, yet there is a large number
> of third party vendors who will sell Microchannel memory boards that support
> more than 16 Mbytes on this model.  How do they do it?  Do they know something
> IBM doesn't know?  Or does IBM know something that the third party vendors
> don't know, like some sort of hidden gotcha when dealing with more than
> 16 Mbytes on such a machine?  I've asked a local IBMer why these third party
> folks are able to provide more than 16 Mbytes, whereas IBM says 16 Mbytes is
> the maximum, but I didn't get an answer.  Why is it so hard to get a straight
> answer to a simple question?

With respect to the Model 70-A21 system memory, that is all that is supported
by the ABIOS of the system, therefore the system can only address 16MB (there's
also DMA on the motherboard and a few other issues). When a company comes along
and extend this architecture (by using an adapter card which includes it's own
BIOS code to address the additional memory), then you can do more with the
system. Look at SVGA, 8514/A, and XGA. They all add on to the current system
configuration to make it better than it was.

Cliff Nadler (cnadler@vnet.ibm.com)
IBM Federal Systems Company - TEAM OS/2

Disclaimer: This post represents the views of the poster, not IBM Corporation.