HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: csuah@warwick.ac.uk (~WISP at CU~)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Sheridan's picks for Superbowl
Date: 15 Aug 92 11:28:18 GMT
Organization: Computing Services, Warwick University, UK

In article <1992Aug12.143346.2911@abode.ttank.com> eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett) writes:
>In article <1992Aug10.195712.28544@usl.edu> dbd0699@usl.edu (Duvan Dien B) writes:
>>Here are Sheridan's odds against winning Super Bowl XXVII
>>
>>Cincinnati		500,000:1
>>Phoenix		750,000:1
>>Indianapolis		1,000,000:1
>>
>>(source: Playboy Sept. 92' written without permission)
>
>I am going to go bet $1.00 on each of these teams and hope that the Colts win
>it all! :)

I'm with you. In a 28-horse race (even over long distance...), it's crazy
to quote odds of 1,000,000:1 against the win. (UK bookies did it once,
500:1 against England winning a cricket match, and boy did they take a
pasting...)

On that score, are these actual odds, or just the opinion of a pundit?

Later,

The Wisp.
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Chris Williams <csuah@uk.ac.warwick.csv> aka <csuah@csv.warwick.ac.uk>
"Tony Greig in the slips, legs apart, waiting for a tickle"
                                      Brian Johnson (thanks to A. Simha 8^>)
From: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Pre season TV
Date: 14 Aug 92 15:36:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: vms.0095F135.1E18F300
Reply-To: 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu
Organization: Marquette University - Computer Services

hi there
Are there any pre-season games tonite on Television?
thanks

************************************************************
RAM            		       BULLS -93	

Politicians' statements tend to have a low specific gravity.
They carry less weight  than their volume would suggest.
		- Jonathan Miller
************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: baxter@donald.cs.umn.edu (Stephenson Thomas)
Subject: Fantasy Football roster help needed (part 2/2)
Organization: University of Minnesota, Twin Cities ACM
Distribution: usa
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 05:51:56 GMT

I am in need of help for a couple of teams I have for fantasy football
this season.  Any help/info you could give me on who to play,who is
out for the season, or who is on a different team would be greatly 
appreciated. Thanks.

      
TEAM 2
------

QUARTERBACKS - Moon/Oilers
	       Montana/49ers

Right now,I'm going to have to go with Moon as my starter.  Everything
I've heard says that Montana will be ready by the opener, which should
make things interesting.

RUNNING BACKS - Riggs/Washington
		Delpino/Rams
		Muster/Bears
		Word/Chiefs
		Ervins/Redskin
		Fenner/Cleveland

As you can see, I have a BIG problem here.  I picked Riggs early,and I
found out yesterday that he was waived by the skins.  Someone  else told
me he retired!! please give me the lo-down on this.  Also I've heard talks
about trades for Barry Word, since Okoye is probably coming back.  Basically, I need serious help in this area.  if Riggs doesn't play, I think I'm screwed.

WIDE RECEIVERS - Taylor/S.F.
		 Tim Brown/L.A.
		 Hill/Falcons
		 Sanders/Washington
		 Beebe/Buffalo
		 Wilson/Packers
		 Nattiel/Tampa Bay

I'm at a loss here.  I haven't heard ANYTHING about ANY of these guys,
so please advise as to who my 4 starters should be.  Also if I play 
Taylor, should I play Montana?  I couldn't quite swing getting Haywood
Jefferies to go with Moon.

KICKERS - Anderson/Saints
	  Murray/Detroit

Both seem to be decent, both indoor kickers, Anderson posted some better
numbers last year however.  Not a big issue.

DEFENSE - Atlanta
	  Buffalo

Well, what can I say.  Hoping Deion Sanders returns to the falcons, but even if he doesn't, I got a pretty good defense.

Again thanks for any input you can give.


Organization: Sophomore, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 21:05:53 -0400 
From: Vernon H Harmon <vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Head Coaches

oooh, test time...

Indianapolis Colts:		Marchibroda
New England Patriots:	uhmm...Hugh something or I other I think
Pittsburgh Steelers:		Cowher
Seattle Seahawks:		Flores
Phoenix Cardinals:		god I can't believe I can't remember his name!

well, 60% ain't *too* bad I guess....

--Vernon.
From: Derek_Juntunen@abcd.Houghton.MI.US (Derek Juntunen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Ty Detmer and other Heisman winners
Distribution: world
Date: 22 Aug 92 11:33:16 EST
Organization: Amiga BitSwap Central Dispatch

In a message dated Thu 20 Aug 92  9:22, Ragraca@vela.acs.oakland.edu (randy
wrote:

 R> Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
 R> Path: mtu.edu!caen!destroyer!wsu-cs!vela!vela!ragraca
 R> From: ragraca@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Randy A. Graca)
 R> Subject: Re: Ty Detmer and other Heisman winners
 R> Message-ID: <ragraca.714312555@vela>
 R> Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI.
 R> References: <Aug19.162521.27235@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>
 R> <1992Aug19.194428.5752@news.stolaf.edu>
 R> Distribution: usa
 R> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 12:09:15 GMT
 R> Lines: 30

 R> alvstad@mari.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Joel D Alvstad) writes:

>In article <Aug19.162521.27235@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>
bokenko@CS.ColoState.EDU (jeffrey scot bokenko) writes:
>>
>>I would like a list of Heisman trophy winners and the teams they play on.
>>Only active players would be nice.  All I can think of is the following:
>>
>>     Desmond Howard      Washington  (??????)
>>     Hershel Walker      Philadelphia
>>     Marcus Allen        Raiders
>>     Ron Brown           Raiders
>>     Ty Detmer           ????????
>>
>>
>>any others you can think of ??????
>>-- 
>>**************************************************************************
***
>>Jeff Bokenko                       CONFUCIOUS SAY:  "He who fishes in
another
>>bokenko@beethoven.cs.colostate.edu           man's well, often catches
crab."
>>**************************************************************************
***

>Um, Barry Sanders??
>Detmer plays for Green Bay.
>Does Mike Rozier still play for Atlanta??
>Vinny Testeverde??


 R> The Detroit Lions have two other Heisman trophy winners on the team
 R> besides Barry Sanders, they are Andre Ware and Chuck Long.       

Chuck Long didn't win the Heisman trophy.  He was beat out by Bo Jackson in
the closest Heisman vote ever.

-- Via DLG Pro v0.995

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: paul@austin.ibm.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Redskins holdouts
Date: 18 Aug 92 14:19:34 GMT
Reply-To: paul@innerdoor.austin.ibm.com
Organization: IBM AWD Graphics Subsystem Development
Originator: paul@wadehra.austin.ibm.com



Well, I heard that yesterday the Redskins told their three holdouts -
Lachey, Green and Howard that they had until midnight (Monday) to accept
their respective offers; otherwise, those offers would go DOWN (hardball).

Any news?

-- 
--- The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of IBM Corp. ------
R. Paul Wadehra                                 Graphics Subsystem Development
paul@wadehra.austin.ibm.com                 IBM Advanced Workstations Division
(512) 838-1132  T/L 678-1132              11400 Burnet Road, Austin, TX  78758
From: rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Packer Update
Date: 14 Aug 92 14:45:07 GMT
Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino CA, USA

In article <1992Aug14.141647.29475@macc.wisc.edu> heim@vms.macc.wisc.edu (JOHN HEIM	) writes:
>Mandarich is in the hospital today being examined for some mysterious 
>ailment (Waiver-itis maybe?).  To be fair, if he is sick it could 
>account his even worse than usual showing.

According to the morning paper, Mandarich is having headaches due to a 
concussion he got in the last pre-season game, so he's not sick, just
injured.

Has there been another guy get as much hype and attention and do as little
as Tony Mandarich in recent NFL history? Maybe he should start that career
as a bodybuilder or pro wrestler. At least as a wrestler he could go back
on the steroids and bulk back up.




Russ Smith
*******************************************************************************
"Many dreams come true, some have silver linings,  
I live for my dreams, and a pocketful of gold"      Led Zeppelin
******************************************************************************





Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood)
Subject: Re: Elway's backup?
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 21:37:32 GMT

In article <jjonsson.105@alexandria.lib.utah.edu> jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu writes:
>In article <1992Aug21.141841.828@colorado.edu> davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood) writes:
>
>>In article <15280123@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com> keithg@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com (Keith Glasson) writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      Just read in the paper that the Broncos cut Steve Peuller.
>>>      I realize he wasn't much, but what does that leave Denver
>>>      with? Maddox and Moore(or Lee, whatever his name is)?
>>>      With Elway getting on in years and more susceptible to
>>>      injury, it seems a bit risky going without a veteran
>>>      backup.
>>>
>>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>>Yes, Maddox & Moore.  Trust me, if you'd seen Pelleur and Moore play, and you
>>didn't know who was the vet, you'd have said Moore in a second.  He is very
>>calm in the pocket, stands in and passes very well.  I think he will do a
>>fine job as backup if Elway goes down.  From what I saw of Maddox, he looks
>>like he could be the future for Denver when Elway retires.
>
>Don't hate me because I'm stupid, but what happened to Gary Kubiak?
>
>
>Jeff Jonsson
>Marriott Library System Support, University of Utah.
>==============================================================================
>--"It's the sound of the secret--  jjonsson@alexandria.lib.utah.edu
>-- machinery at the center of  --  jjonsson@utahlib.bitnet
>-- the world." -Cliff Steele   --  "You talkin' to me?"

He retired after last year.  Back problems.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Rex Wood -- davewood@cs.colorado.edu -- University of Colorado at Boulder
  BRONCOS!!        R.S.F.P. Internet Football Pool Organizer        BRONCOS!!
               Owner, Boulder Houlders --- Owner, Colorado 14ers
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: imprint@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca (IMPRINT -- UW's Student Newspaper)
Subject: Re: Worst Rules in NFL
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 14:20:52 GMT

In article <65913@hydra.gatech.EDU> gt6390a@prism.gatech.EDU (BERNSTEIN,AVRON P) writes:
>
>I'm just curious as to what the opinions are out there as to the absolute
>SINGLE worst rule the NFL currently has.  There are some pretty bad ones out
>there.  IMHO, the worst has to be the rule allowing a penalty to be called
>on a home team for "excessive crowd noise."  I always thought that was to
>be encouraged and was part of the home field advantage.  What do you guys
>think the worst is?
>-- 
>BERNSTEIN,AVRON P
>Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
>uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt6390a
>Internet: gt6390a@prism.gatech.edu

It's a tie. The first is sudden death overtime. Both teams should get equal number of possessions in overtime until one wins.
The second is the point after touchdown -- there should be a two-point convert.

Peter Brown
-- 

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: holly@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com (Holly Wise)
Subject: Re: Pre season TV
Organization: Lockheed Santa Cruz, CA.
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 92 17:41:14 GMT

In article <0095F135.1E18F300@vms.csd.mu.edu> 5912ramasubr@vms.csd.mu.edu writes:

>hi there
>Are there any pre-season games tonite on Television?
>thanks

Yes, San Diego plays at New England.
-----
holly@mailhub.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: st1ge@Rosie.UH.EDU (Edward Hui)
Subject: Re: The Trade Rumors
Reply-To: st1ge@Rosie.UH.EDU
Organization: University of Houston
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 05:31:28 GMT

In article <1992Aug12.133604.22466@usho93.hou281.chevron.com>, hjjcl@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.J.Clyde) writes:
>In article <1992Aug11.130518.11942@europa.asd.contel.com> brian@intercon.com (Brian Lichorowic) writes:
>>Here's what I hear:
>>
>>Colts- Looking for a Running Back that can do 20 - 30 carries a week
>>
>>-Anthony Thompson of the Cardinals has said he'd like to be traded ASAP and , 
>>being a Indiana guy, would like to play in Indy.  Colts fans have vocally 
>>supported going after the former 1990 Cardinal # 1 pick.
>
>Question.  During MNF's Saints-Bears game, while watching the impressive
>running of Vaughn Dunbar, one of the guys (Frank?) commented that Dunbar
>was the first "ball-handler" from IU to be drafted in the first round
>since some Joe Blow from the 60's.  So then was Anthony Thompson a
>1st-rounder?  What he just the Cards' first pick (may not have been 1st
>round)?  Supplemental draftee?
      He was the Cardinal's first pick in 1990 but it was in the 2nd round.
The Cards lost their first round pick that year because they drafted Timm
Rosenbach in the supplemental draft in 1989.

>-- 
>*************************************************************************
>GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!!      | "That haircut of yours might be city-style,
>GEAUX SAINTS!!!!!!!!      |  but your heart is shaped like a bowl."
>James Clyde     LSU '91   |             -- Briscoe Darlin, T.A.G.S.

Edward Hui
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: players union was Re: No Draft Next Year?!
Organization: University of Michigan
	<1992Aug18.210655.5358@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU>
	<1992Aug18.231231.7104@pbhya.PacBell.COM>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 15:13:05 GMT

In article <1992Aug18.231231.7104@pbhya.PacBell.COM> drhall1@pbhya.PacBell.COM (Doug R. Hall) writes:

   I remember Gene Upshaw talking as though he was the head of an 
   organizaion when the McNeil trial started. The owners were even talking as 
   if they could negotiate a settlement. Is there something now that 
   represents the players collectively even it's not called a union?

There are differences between various labor "unions".  A certified union has
certain legal rights and responsibilities, though I'm not certain of what
they are.  I know that the NFL players have *no* certified union, though I
believe that Upshaw is the head of the existing players union.

I believe all that is necessary is for a certain majority of players to vote
for certification, thus allowing for the closed shop rules that appear in
other work areas (e.g. many GM plants).  This is *probably* what is needed
for the CBA to protect the draft from an antitrust ruling, and how the nfl
gets around the argument that an undrafted rookie hasn't signed a contract.
How about this reasoning: a certified union agrees to accept the draft, and
since the union is certified (and thus all players must join, though they can
later vote to overturn the certification), a rookie can't sue because he will
necessarily express support for the draft by being compelled to join the
union.  This is how I *think* the legal reasoning works, but I'm certainly
not certain.

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
Organization: Sophomore, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 15:37:03 -0400 
From: Vernon H Harmon <vh00+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Worst Rules in NFL
	<BszqnI.1uv@rice.edu>

>
So, if a team is down by eight points and their running back breaks into the
open for what would normally be a 15+ yard touchdown, he should run out
of bounds
at the 1 inch line, so he can score a one-inch touchdown?   Yechhh!
>

well, now you tell me. In today's NFL is a player gonna be more
interested in getting *his* stats bettered or in making it easier for
his team to score the 2-pt conversion? that's what I thought. :D besides
I *didn't* say it was a GOOD suggestion, just one to ponder.... ;)

--Vernon.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: paul@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul R Krueger)
Subject: Re: Buckley wants to be traded ??
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 20:55:30 GMT

In article <1144@ceylon.gte.com> chf0@gte.com writes:
>I read in the Boston Globe today that Terrell Buckley has stated that
>he wants to be traded because the Packers aren't going to pay him
>enough money.  Now, having lived through all of the Miami signing
>"noise" this summer, I already know how much stock to place in these
>rumblings (ie, not much), but if Buckley is serious, I know a South
>Florida team who'd *love* to have him!!
>
>Imagine - Buckley and Vincent at cornerback for the Dolphins!  I think
>he'd be worth next year's number one and a couple of veterans....
>
   How 'bout Buckley for Vincent? I'd take it.

   --salty
From: Derek_Juntunen@abcd.Houghton.MI.US (Derek Juntunen)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Lion news - 8/18/92
Date: 18 Aug 92 18:17:23 GMT
Organization: Amiga BitSwap Central Dispatch

The Detroit Lions lost to the Buffalo Bills yesterday in Buffalo.

Andre Ware did not do well as usual, although he could have used some help
from his offensive line and recievers fhe was 0-3).  Rodney Peete looked
pretty good and ready to go for the season.  Hopefully he'll stay healthy
this year.  Chuck Long was so-so.  Erik Kramer didn't look that good. 
There were some passes he threw that were terrible.

Barry Sanders didn't play much, but he was spectacular as usual.  Tilliman
looked pretty good most of the game, aside from his fumble.  And I was very
impressed with Byron Sanders (is he related to Barry?).  The guy looks like
an exact clone of Barry Sanders, with a few less moves.  

The offensive line did not do well.  Lomas Brown was the only starter
though.  But hey, there was no excuse of the OL terrible play.

The defensive line was also bad; letting the Bills get 5+ yards on every
running play.  That won't happen when Jerry Ball, Chris Spielmon, and Mike
Cofer playing though.  

The pass coverage could have been better (Ray Crockett and Bennie Blades
didn't play).  Although, Harry Colon was everywhere as he was last week.

The recievers looked okay.  Mike Farr looked the best, maked a few
excellent finger-tip catches.

Thats all I have to say...

Derek Juntunen

-- Via DLG Pro v0.995
From: tf0y+@andrew.cmu.edu (Todd Harris Fletcher)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: The Trade Rumors
Date: 14 Aug 92 14:50:03 GMT
	<1992Aug14.053128.10185@menudo.uh.edu>
Organization: University Relations - Diane, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA

I heard this one this morning on the way to work:

Burt Grossman goig to the Steelers.  They didn't mention what for.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: vamplew@probitas.cs.utas.edu.au (Peter Vamplew)
Subject: Re: Instant Replay
Organization: University of Tasmania, Australia.
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 02:20:17 GMT

In <1992Aug12.141826.11171@colorado.edu> davewood@bruno.cs.colorado.edu (David Rex Wood) writes:

>Nothing is more frustrating than getting screwed by a bad call that would
>obviously be overturned by the replay.  I'd rather have the little delay a
>few times a game than lose on a bad call.

Personally I think getting rid of the replay was the best move the NFL
has made recently. On the basis of the games I saw there were about as
many bad calls made after reviewing the play as were actually made on
the field. And of course there were the ever-present problems like the
inadvertent whistle which the replay officials couldn't do anything
about.

Regardless of what system is being used, umpires are going to make bad
calls and people are going to complain about them. Why not go with the
system which causes the least disruption to the game? Besides, even
without replay I think the NFL officials' mistake ratio must be amongst 
the lowest for any sport I've ever watched (compared with Scottish soccer
refs the NFL guys look positively infallible).

Now all we have to do is get rid of the anti-celebration rule!

Peter Vamplew    vamplew@cs.utas.edu.au
Go Bengals! Go Falcons (Atlanta and Hobart)! Go Tasmaniacs!
From: gsh7w@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: BUCKLEY SIGNS!!!
Date: 20 Aug 92 18:35:42 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <55796@olivea.atc.olivetti.com>
rsmith@strobe.ATC.Olivetti.Com (Russ Smith) writes: 
#So essentially he's using the Braves and getting paid to do it, while
#he's not getting paid by the Packers.

Using the Braves for 20K, after turning down 2,300K because he wanted
3,000K? 

Well, he just demonstrated he has a 2 million dollar ego, cause that's
what he turned down.

I'm *SO* glad that the Packers took him instead of Vincent.

--
-Greg Hennessy, University of Virginia
 USPS Mail:     Astronomy Department, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475 USA
 Internet:      gsh7w@virginia.edu  
 UUCP:		...!uunet!virginia!gsh7w
From: dkl@cs.arizona.edu (David K. Lowenthal)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Steelers back?
Date: 12 Aug 92 16:09:21 GMT
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <0eWFy4m00iUyI1Mbt4@andrew.cmu.edu> tf0y+@andrew.cmu.edu (Todd Harris Fletcher) writes:
>And concerning the score, 35-33 Eagles, the game ended with O'Donnell
>driving the Steelers for the fifth time in the 4th quarter.  They got to
>the Eagles' 23 yard line and with :02 left spiked the ball to stop the
>clock.  One of the tackles was not on the line so the referee called a
>penalty.  They said that the penalty was a :10 runoff and the game was
>over.  It turns out that they were wrong and it should have been a 5
>yard penalty and giving Gary Automatic a chance at a 45yd FG.  I know
>it's only a preseason game, but that's still a shitty way to lose a game.
>Todd


What is the rule on this?  I know that if someone gets hurt on the
offense and they are driving within 2 minutes, it is a 10 second runoff.
Also, if the offense commits a penalty, it is not a runoff, but the normal
penalty.  But what if the offense is driving, and the QB throws a long
pass to some WR.  Now the offense has no TO's left, and when the refs spot
the ball for play, only the 2 WR's are near the line of scrimmage, as
the QB and lineman are still running down the field.  So the 2 WR's, knowing
they have say 3 seconds left and the rest of the team will not make it
to the line, line up as the center and QB, snap the ball, incurring a
penalty for not enough men on the line of scrimmage.  What is the call?
Is it clock stopped and a 5 yd penalty, or is it a runoff because this
is really kind of cheating.


--dave
From: lesher@pollux.tmc.edu (T. Lesher)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Skins depth chart?
Date: 14 Aug 92 14:45:52 GMT
Organization: Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pa.

Could anyone out there post a 'Skins depth chart?  I'd appreciate it
much...



--
Tim Lesher  <lesher@bucknell.edu>

"CS Majors-- we do more after 11:00 PM than most people do all day!"
                                -- Dustin Emhart
From: eric@abode.ttank.com (Eric C. Bennett)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Sheridan's picks for Superbowl
Date: 12 Aug 92 14:33:46 GMT
Organization: Abode Computer Services

In article <1992Aug10.195712.28544@usl.edu> dbd0699@usl.edu (Duvan Dien B) writes:
>Here are Sheridan's odds against winning Super Bowl XXVII
>
>Cincinnati		500,000:1
>Phoenix		750,000:1
>Indianapolis		1,000,000:1
>
>(source: Playboy Sept. 92' written without permission)

I am going to go bet $1.00 on each of these teams and hope that the Colts win
it all! :)

Eric


-- 
     Eric C. Bennett	 uucp: ..!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!wvus!abode!eric
     San Gabriel, Ca Internet: eric@abode.ttank.com

>>> The world is a circus. My friends act like clowns so this must be true. <<< 
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro