HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tnixon@hayes.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: AT&T's new 28,800bps modem.
Date: 13 Nov 92 11:53:14 EDT
Organization: Hayes Microcomputer Products, Norcross, GA

In article <1992Nov12.013543.9064@nwnexus.WA.COM>, ninja@halcyon.com
(Jonathan Roy) writes: 

> AT&T Paradyne in Largo announced Tuesday it has developed a modem
> that can operate at the world's fastest transmission speed --- 28,800
> bits per second.
> ...
> Is this based on V.fast? Is V.fast even finalized yet? 

V.fast is not finalized, and probably won't be until sometime in 
1994.  AT&T Paradyne is one of the major contributors to the work. 
The modem announced is undoubtedly based on the technology that AT&T 
has been promoting with the V.fast group, just as Codex's modem is 
based on the technology Codex has been promoting.

-- 
Toby Nixon, Principal Engineer      | Voice   +1-404-840-9200  Telex 401243420
Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc.  | Fax     +1-404-447-0178  CIS   70271,404
P.O. Box 105203                     | BBS     +1-404-446-6336  AT&T    !tnixon
Atlanta, Georgia  30348             | UUCP uunet!hayes!tnixon  Fido   1:114/15
USA                                 | Internet                tnixon@hayes.com
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:16686 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:29452
From: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Supra vs Zoom v32bis FaxModems
Date: 10 Nov 92 19:48:41 GMT
Organization: Schlumberger Technologies, ATE division, San Jose, Ca.
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5

Tad Cook (tad@ssc.com) wrote:
: In article <1dejepINNndh@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> twong@civil.ubc.ca (Thomas Wong) writes:
: >I hear that both modems are not very good modems in that there are
: >problems with compatibilities with other modems, and problems with the
: >busy signal. For a little more, you can get a US Robotics Sportster
: >which is a much better product (but I hate how it looks though. :) ).
: >
: 
: My ZOOM VFX has had no problems with busy signals.  I just used the
: intialization string shown in the manual.  I also have had no problems
: with compatibility with various V.32bis and V.32 modems, such as
: Hayes, Intel, Supra, Twincom, USR HST, etc.
: 

I second this. Mine has had no problems at all. Early, there was a bug in the
ROM version that hadd some difficulty connecting to some 2400 baud modems,
but they sent new ROM's free of charge, and it fixed it right up.

You can add Telebit WorldBlazers and T3000's to the above list of modems it
has no problems connecting with.

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies ATE   UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             Voice: (408)437-5254  FAX: (408)437-5246
Xref: sparky comp.dcom.modems:16427 de.comm.misc:2325
From: rlcarr@animato.network23.com (Rich Carreiro)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,de.comm.misc
Subject: Re: ZyXEL Bug : Can not write value into NVRAM
Distribution: world
X-NewsSoftware: GRn 1.16f (10.17.92) by Mike Schwartz & Michael B. Smith
Date: 2 Nov 92 18:21:25 EDT
Organization: The Other Side of Life

In article <1992Oct31.124256.2415@cs.tu-berlin.de> ernst@opal.cs.tu-berlin.de (Ernst Kloecker) writes:
> I found this bug on a ZyXEL 1496E (ROM V 4.02) as well as on a ZyXEL 1496E+
> (ROM V 5.02 P). Do not try to reproduce it, as there is no way back until
> the bug is fixed by ZyXEL.
> 
> If you change the AT&D setting to AT&D3 and write that into NVRAM with
> AT&W0, then you cannot change the AT&D setting in the NVRAM ever again.
> You can use different AT&D settings during the current session, but as
> soon as you issue an ATZ or turn the modem off and on, the AT&D setting
> changes back to AT&D3. This is very annoying as AT&D0 (ignore DTR) is the
> setting I need mostly. AT&D3 means : DTR off causes modem to hang up and
> reset the modem from profile #0 (only documented on the quick reference
> guide).
> 
> Has anybody else noticed this bug ?

Yes.  And you can fix it with a full reset.  Hold in Data/Voice (I believe)
while turning the modem on.

This will reset NVRAM to factory defaults.


-- 
Rich Carreiro                                  Home: (401)841-8514
rlcarr@animato.network23.com
uunet.uu.net!animato!rlcarr
From: hp48sx@wupost.wustl.edu (HP48SX Archive Maintainer)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Problems returning to connection after +++
Date: 8 Nov 1992 15:56:08 -0600
Organization: Washington University in Saint Louis, MO USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: wuarchive.wustl.edu

My Supra V.32bis has some problems when I hit +++ in the middle of a
session, and then issue commands like AT%Q (line quality report) then I
can not return to my connection. If I use ATO then there is no longer
contact to the host. How to I continue my old session ?

-- 
Povl H. Pedersen             hp48sx@wuarchive.wustl.edu
HP48sx archive maintainer

All Opinions (C) Copyright the Intergalactic Thought Association
From: csc2mxs@cabell.vcu.edu (Marko Siladin)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: CompuCom
Date: 5 Nov 1992 12:08:34 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

Hi!
Does anyboy know what happened to CompuCom? I tried to get
an upgrade on my BIOS, but when I called their 800 number
some other company answered. They also received a lot of
phone calls but couldn't help me in finding the new number.
...Marko
From: Petty@ralvm29.VNET.IBM.COM (Jack Petty)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 08:14:22 EST
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: BISYNCH in PCs?
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM
News-Software: UReply 3.0

In <3842@key.COM> J. R. Pendleton writes:
>   3.) Recommend  a good BISYNCH primer.  3rd grade level
>       would be nice and probably appropriate.
Jerry,
GA27-3004 is the IBM publication number of a document called
General Information - Binary Synchronous Communications.
There should be someone in your local branch office who could tell
you how to get a copy.
IBM used to sell a BSC adapter card for PCs.  I have no idea whether
any are still available.

Jack Petty
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser)
Subject: Re: Boy am I confused over which modem to get...
Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix  (508) 655-3848
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 03:23:57 GMT

mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael Rosen) writes:

Boy am I confused over which modem to get...

Save your pennies and buy Telebits.   ... that is, if you value RELIABILITY!
-- 
bill@unixland.natick.ma.us                      ESIX Mailing List Moderator
Public Access UNIX/USENET/E-MAIL!  UUCP Accounts Available!  (508) 655-3848
5 High-Speed Lines  V.32bis/V.32/PEP/V.42bis, etc.   Located in Natick, MA USA
From: rlee@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Ralph Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: 1) LOOKING FOR PHONE NUMBERS OF MODEM MANUFACTURERS.
Date: 12 Nov 1992 11:11:36 GMT
Organization: The University of Western Australia
NNTP-Posting-Host: tartarus.uwa.edu.au

Yeah, wonder anyone might be able to help me by giving some contact
numbers for the various modem manufacturers in the US.

The reason why I'm asking is that I need to ask them whether their
modems are approved for use in Aust. so that I can purchase one as well.

Thanks for all your help
Ralph
rlee@tartarus.uwa.edu.au

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
From: tad@ssc.com (Tad Cook)
Subject: Re: Supra vs Zoom v32bis FaxModems
Organization: very little
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 22:47:48 GMT

In article <1dejepINNndh@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> twong@civil.ubc.ca (Thomas Wong) writes:
>I hear that both modems are not very good modems in that there are
>problems with compatibilities with other modems, and problems with the
>busy signal. For a little more, you can get a US Robotics Sportster
>which is a much better product (but I hate how it looks though. :) ).
>

My ZOOM VFX has had no problems with busy signals.  I just used the
intialization string shown in the manual.  I also have had no problems
with compatibility with various V.32bis and V.32 modems, such as
Hayes, Intel, Supra, Twincom, USR HST, etc.



-- 
 Tad Cook     |  Phone:  206-527-4089  (home)     |   MCI Mail: 3288544   
 Seattle, WA  |  Packet: KT7H @ N7DUO.WA.USA.NA   |   3288544@mcimail.com 
              |  Internet: tad@ssc.com           or...sumax!ole!ssc!tad   
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: puma <puma@halcyon.com>
Subject: Re: 14.4Kbps Modems and Procomm+
Originator: bbs@halcyon.com
Keywords: l1,99
Organization: The 23:00 News and Mail Service
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 23:47:06 GMT

gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews) writes:

> In article <W8SDZ.12826597553.BABYL@WSMR-SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL> CHARLIE@UMVMA.UMS
> >husc10.harvard.edu!jiu1@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU writes:
> >>I just "discovered" that my copy of procomm plus does not support
> >>14.4K bps communication speed.  After 2,400 come 4,800, 9,600,
     ...
>      clock  / divisor  =  speed
>     ----------------------------
>     115,200 /     1    = 115,200
>     115,200 /     2    =  57,600
>     115,200 /     3    =  38,400
>     115,200 /     6    =  19,200
>     115,200 /    12    =   9,600
>     115,200 /    48    =   2,400
>     115,200 /    96    =   1,200
>     115,200 /   384    =     300
> 
> You'll notice that there are a lot of divisor values missing if you
> only list the "normal" speeds.  A divisor value of 8 will give you
> 14,400 bps.
> 
> So you see the software certainly could support 14,400 bps.  They just
> haven't done it.
but the real point here is that you don't WANT to talk at 14,400 bps
to the modem,  you want to use a faster speed 19,200 or 38,400 and
flow control to allow the modem to do whatever compression is possible
on the data stream.  

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: gerg@netcom.com (Greg Andrews)
Subject: Re: T2500 as a leased line modem?
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 07:10:08 GMT

In article <1992Nov3.153614.168@hsh.com> lee@hsh.com (Lee Havemann) writes:
>I thought that I had read in the Telebit T2500 reference manual that you 
>could configure them to operate as leased line modems, but I seem to have 
>misplaced my book. 
>  We want to use them on a leased line to do UUCP transfers.
>Can we do this, or do I have to buy 2 modems? (I already own a T2500 :-)
>

You can configure them to communicate across leased lines.  The modem
setup is pretty simple.  Set the modulation type with S50, the RS232
port speed with S51, the flow control type with S58/S68.  For uucp
use to another T2500, you'd probably want S50=255 S51=5 S58=2 S111=30.
(maybe S58=0 if they're not used for anything else but uucp)

Then set one of the modems with S7=255 S101=1, and the other with
S7=255 S101=2.

The S101 register setting will make the modems automatically connect
through the phone line without dialing or waiting for a ring signal.

IMPORTANT:  The leased phone line MUST be a 2-wire, analog line.
            Some phone companies will refer to the line as a "9600 baud"
            line.  Some might even tell you it won't work unless it's
            a 4-wire line.  That's not true for the T2500.  It works
            fine over dialup lines, which are 2-wire circuits, it
            will work just as well over a 2-wire leased line.  (No
            you can't buy a 4-wire line and run two modem links
            across it - the wiring doesn't work that way except in
            very special situations.

Sometimes you need to have the modems transmit a louder signal than
you need for dialup lines.  The T2500 has a socketed resistor you can
change to adjust the output level.  See Appendix F of the reference
manual for resistor values.

Call Telebit tech support at +1-800-TELEBIT or +1-408-734-5200 for
more information.


-- 
 .------------------------------------------------------------------.
 |  Greg Andrews   |       UUCP: {amdahl,claris}!netcom!gerg        |
 |                 |   Internet: gerg@netcom.COM                    |
 `------------------------------------------------------------------'
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz
Subject: Re: Supra won't connect
Organization: Actrix Information Exchange
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 18:21:57 GMT

In article <17242@mindlink.bc.ca> David_Hunter@mindlink.bc.ca (David Hunter) writes:
> I have a Supra v. 32bis external modem.  Since the ROM upgrade it has worked
> very well.  However, I recently tried to connect to a local library system
> which runs at 2400.  I dialed up the system and got a Connect 2400 result
> code, about 7 or 8 garbage characters appeared on my screen and then the
> connection was lost.  I tried several times to complete the connection using
> Procomm for DOS and Windows.  Everytime the result was the same.  My Supra is
> basically configured with &F2 with only a couple of minor changes.
> 
> Does anyone have any suggestions?  This is the only system I have been unable
> to connect with.

Try turning off the error correction/data compression completely by entering:
 
AT\N0
 
I have run into several - old - 2400 modems that just can't handle the new
moems initial handshaking.
 
There is nothing wrong with the SUPRA. It also wouldn't surprise me if the
local library system was running on a VAX - maybe even a PDP11. I have struck
this before.
 
Steve

-- 
Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | On Sept. 19th, 88% of NZ voters opted
Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz         | for proportional representation. It
withers_s@kosmos.wcc.govt.nz            | looks like we may get a more  
**** Happy user of OS/2 v2!! ****       | democratic system "real soon now".
From: ctoomey@ccvax.ucd.ie
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Problems with Lightcom 144F & another unrelated question!
Date: 10 Nov 92 13:54:45 GMT
Organization: University College Dublin

3 quick questions :-D ..

1)	I bought an El Cheapo V32.bis/V42.bis 8-bit internal card faxmodem 
	based on the (in)famous Rockwell chipset.  It is produced by 
	`Lightning Communications' in California, and is called something like
	a `LiteFax 14F' [don't have the box in front of me..]  It has a 16550a
	UART.  I bought it for the equivalent of $450 which is the VERY
	cheapest you could buy a modem here in Ireland; enduser price for an
	internal V32.bis/V42.bis ZyXel is about $935, while a Courier DS would
	set you back a whopping $2160 [modem prices are totally out of touch
	with reality here :-D]

	Anyhow, some testing with said Lightning (Zzzzaaap!) modem has shown
	it to be a bit tempermental - it REFUSES to connect to another similar
	modem via Long Distance; It (sometimes) locks carriers @ 14400, but
	always without initiating ANY error-correction.  Via local call with
	same 2 modems, and all works okay.  Sound familiar to anyone?

	What I'm wondering is if anyone has seen/used/heard of this modem, and
	has any hints/problems worth sharing with me.


2)	Does anyone know if there is such thing as a modem that could be used
	with a laptop (Compaq LTE/20s) that plugs into the DIN socket of a
	cellular phone, and handles communications through handoff etc.
	(presumably with V42 or MNP4), allowing someone [although maybe not
	physically on the move] to dial into a port on an office machine,
	at some reasonable speed (above 1200bps).


3)	Why don't modem manufacturers place flash erasable EPROMs into the
	new generation of modems, as PC manufacturers are starting to do,
	making all the business of shipping ROMs etc. to users defunct.
	Granted, if a manufacturer was to view ROM upgrades as a source of
	income (silly,silly), it would be more difficult to control
	distribution of the software images; but sure, EPROM blowers can be
	bought for next to nothing nowadays.


Email preferred, but posting is great too !...


Thanks in advance,

		- Colm Toomey -
		B.Sc.(Hons.), Graduate Student in Comp. Sci.


P.S. My modem is driving me batty!
From: utama@ee.tamu.edu (Peter Utama)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Netfax-3.2.1 and ZyXEL : +FHNG:40, what is wrong?
Date: 5 Nov 92 07:54:54 GMT
Organization: Texas A&M University


Hi all,

Thanks to Chris Arnold, I have succesfully (at some degree) sent my 
first fax page using Netfax-3.2.1 and ZyXEL 1496E.

The program sent the first page, but it received +FHNG:40 at the end of the
page, so it assumed an error had happened and concluded that the sending failed.
But the other side received the first page nicely.

I understand that some have encounter similar problem. Does anyone have any clue
of what the problem is?

I include my log file of what's going on:

	.
	.
	.
(send.c:55) dialing: 9,6966716
(write.c:41) sending ATDT9,6966716\r:
(response.c:130) parse_text_response: parsing: "+FCON"
(response.c:130) parse_text_response: parsing: "+FNSF:00 00 00 00 "
(response.c:130) parse_text_response: parsing: "+FCSI:                "
(response.c:130) parse_text_response: parsing: "+FDIS:1,3,0,2,0,0,0,4"
(response.c:269) Received OK message
(send.c:285) sending g3 file
(send.c:149) setting xmit params: 0 1 0 2
(write.c:41) sending AT+FDT=0,1,0,2\r:
(response.c:130) parse_text_response: parsing: "+FNSF:00 00 00 00 "
(response.c:130) parse_text_response: parsing: "+FCSI:                "
(response.c:130) parse_text_response: parsing: "+FDIS:1,3,0,2,0,0,0,4"
(response.c:130) parse_text_response: parsing: "+FDCS:1,3,0,2,0,0,0,4"
(response.c:258) received connect response
(send.c:332) Trying to send g3 codes
(write.c:41) sending :(g3 codes)
	.
	.
(response.c:269) Received OK message
(send.c:357) send of file has completed
(send.c:197) end of current page, another page will be sent
(write.c:41) sending AT+FET=0\r:
(response.c:130) parse_text_response: parsing: "+FHNG:40"
(response.c:269) Received OK message
(send.c:397) hangup code received while sending pages
(send.c:94) send of page 0 failed
(gen.c:159) hanging up the modem
(write.c:41) sending ATH\r:
(response.c:231) numeric response code: 3
(process.c:300) unable to send fax to 9,6966716

Any comments or suggestion would be very much appreciated.

Thanks,

-peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Utama				utama@ee.tamu.edu
Dept. of Electrical Eng.		voice:(409)845-2362
Texas A&M Univ. 			fax:(409)845-6259
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: dkw@wolferts.ka.sub.org (Dr. Klaus Wolferts)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Re: Telephone Fax Switch, CNG Signal, FaxModem Software
Date: 8 Nov 92 17:11:51 GMT
Organization: Ing'Buro f. EDV + Elektronik, D-7500 Karlsruhe 31

alansar@ccs.northeastern.edu (Mohammad Al-Ansari) writes:

> In article <HXsPTB1w164w@wolferts.ka.sub.org> dkw@wolferts.ka.sub.org 
>            (Dr. Klaus Wolferts) writes:
> >> > >In <1992Oct26.050119.7848@random.ccs.northeastern.edu>, Mohammad Al-Ans
> > >> > >> The problem with this approach is that it relies on the CNG tones.
>
> [...]
> 
> >And here several modem fax software packages fail too:
> >
> >I have tried BitFax Class 1 V3.09A, DosFax lite V2.00 and WinFax Lite 
> >V2.0. They DON'T start a transmission with the CNG tone but wait for the 
> >CED signal of the called station. 
> 
> This is strange since I have WinFax Lite which came with my SupraFaxModem
> and it *does* generate CNG tones when it initiates a call. 
> 
> Incidently, the Supra modem has an option that can be used with the ATD
> command which is the character ^.  If you dial using a command like
> ATDT^123-4567, the modem would start sending CNG commands just as it begins
> dialing, and it continues to do that until it connects.  I think that the
> software uses this kind of command to generate the CNG tones.
>
> Might it be that you modem does not support this command? Or maybe your
> version of WinFax Lite is not doing this. Try this command (or any similar on
> that might be documented for you particular modem) from a comm program and se
> what happens.

Fine and very useful feature of the SupraFax modem. I tried this immediately 
with my Digicom Scout Plus V.32bis FaxModem but had no luck.
It does not recognize the '^' dial modifier and therefore does not start 
with the CNG-signal. May be it has to set up in a special way for this or 
needs a special command or register setup but the manual doesnt tell 
a word about fax mode or commands anyway :-(
The WinFax or DosFax manual don't mention such a command either, but I 
am sur all fax sw packages are able to use this feature once a faxmodem 
supports it.

Klaus


 ____    __  __  __    __   __
|    \  |  |/ / |  | /|  | / / Dr.-Ing. Klaus Wolferts: dkw@wolferts.ka.sub.org

|  |  | |  | /  |  |/ |  |/ / Ing'Buro f. EDV + Elektronik  
| d|  | | k| \  | w| /|  | / Mitteltorstr. 45,            Phone: +49 721 706016
|____/  |__|\_\ |__|/ |__|/ D-7500 Karlsruhe 31, Germany,  49x03'02"N 8x22'58"E
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: u7824501@cc.nctu.edu.tw (Wei-Jou Chen)
Subject: Fax software ftp site ?
Organization: National Chiao Tung University
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 05:55:54 GMT


Hello ! all,

    Do you know where I can find the software of Fax in ftp site ?

    If you know and reply me through email, I would be very appreciated.

    Thanks !

    my email address is u7824501@ccsun8.cc.nctu.edu.tw
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
From: mparker@adobe.com (Mike Parker)
Subject: Re: PostScript support for Fax modems?
Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated, Mountain View
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 17:14:13 GMT

In article <hoepfner-131192092533@hoepfner.gsfc.nasa.gov> hoepfner@heasfs.gsfc.nasa.gov (Patrick Hoepfner) writes:
>
>I assumed that the likes of NEC, Compaq and Cannon wouldn't build these
>devices to a *non* standard.  I now wonder if a Compaq will talk to a NEC
>or a Cannon PS-fax!  

There are four PS-fax capable systems shipping, two from NEC and two from
Compaq, they all talk to each other just fine.  Any others that we might
happen to be working on will interoperate as well.

> And Mike, can we expect Adobe to release the
>documentation on PS file transmission, create an application interface for
>third-parties to and do a little evangelism?

The documentation is almost complete. The likely evangelists are Derek
Balzensky and me, I, for one, am not going to try to talk a company into
building a new product based on Adobe technology for which I cannot yet
deliver documentation.  The application interface is in the planning stage,
specs and schedules have not been finalized.
>
>The Macintosh and I assume Windows won't have to worry about the 3rd party
>interface though...

I guess it's true that one could find loopholes in the existing stuff to
get the job done, but it'll be a lot easier with a driver that was designed
to allow for this sort of application.

mike


Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax,comp.unix.sysv386
From: jalsop@seachg.uucp (John Alsop)
Subject: Looking for FAX Server software for SCO UNIX, DOS clients
Reply-To: jalsop@seachg.UUCP (John Alsop)
Organization: Sea Change Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 15:31:58 GMT

I am looking for a FAX solution for a network consisting of approx. 20 DOS
PC's running Windows, and a 486 server running SCO UNIX, all connected via
TCP/IP and NFS.

I would like the ability for the client PC's to send faxes to the server
for queueing and subsequent output. All the usual features are required 
(e.g. sending same fax to multiple destinations).  The ability to fax 
Wordperfect or MS Word documents is important.

Please send e-mail if you know of any products that provide the above
features.  I'll post a summary if there is interest.

Thanks in advance,

-- 
John Alsop

Sea Change Corporation
6695 Millcreek Drive, Unit 8
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5N 5R8
Tel: 416-542-9484 Fax: 416-542-9479
UUCP: ...!uunet!uunet.ca!seachg!jalsop  jalsop@seachg.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax