HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sastxb@weevil.unx.sas.com (Thomas Bednarek)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: linda's IQ
Date: 14 Apr 92 12:41:47 GMT
    <1992Apr9.222020.22326@mic.ucla.edu> <1992Apr13.181832.11748@unx.sas.com> 
    <1992Apr13.211654.3019@menudo.uh.edu>
Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
Originator: sastxb@weevil.unx.sas.com
X-Bytes: 1237

In article <1992Apr13.211654.3019@menudo.uh.edu>, edc@evolution.bchs.uh.edu (edward s. chen) writes:
>
>To kill another known false rumor:
>
>The tapes of "Linda singing" are *not* her.
>

	Sorry! I didn't know that these had been
"proven" to be a hoax. In any case, I did hear her
sing (and slam a tambourine during "Golden Slumbers")
at the Raleigh show. My bias runs deeper than a couple
of dj's idea of a good time.

>Pete Townshend has said (not jokingly) that he would
>like to produce a Linda solo album. oh well...
>

	I respect Pete Townshend's opinion of Linda;
I would respect his production abilities even more if
he could make a Linda solo album that I would buy.
Everything I've heard from her (even a couple of hoaxes)
in the past leads me to believe that she is not musically
exceptional. I could be wrong. 	

>Defending Beatle wives for as long as I can remember,
>

	My post was not an "attack" on Beatle's wives; in
fact, it explicitly states that I am not objective when
considering their talents. In other words, I don't dislike
Linda's (and Yoko's, for that matter) music because they're
Beatle wives, I simply don't think it's very good.

	Why do you feel they need defending? ;)

				Tom
				(sastxb@vms.sas.com)
From: bad@pismo.sw.stratus.com (Bruce Dumes)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: BeatleTrivia
Date: 9 Apr 92 13:57:38 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Stratus Computer, Software Engineering

In article <73361@netnews.upenn.edu> simmonsb@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Dazed and Confused) writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.120436.7331@waikato.ac.nz> deryl@waikato.ac.nz writes:
>>In article <1992Apr8.190854.17463@ncsu.edu>, cmgrawbu@eos.ncsu.edu (CHRISTOPHER M GRAWBURG) writes:
>>> 4000
>
>>Just because there were 4000 rather small holes in Blackford Lancashire, which
>>he counted... does that necessarily imply that 4000 is the number required
>>to fill the Albert Hall?
>
>I always thought that because the Beatles weren't allowed to play Albert Hall
>that John was talking about how many assHOLES it took to fill the Albert Hall.
>Did anyone else think this? Is it wrong? If so, what the hell is he talking 
>about?
>

For the answer to this one, once again turn to your copy of "The Book".  
"The Book" is, of course, "The Beatles Recording Sessions" by Lewisohn.
I don't have an extra one here at work (but I really should), so I can't give
you the page number, but there is a copy of a newspaper article describing
the number of potholes in the streets in Blackburn, Lancashire.  Please note
this is *Blackburn*, not Blackford!

All you folks who like to read into things can try to figure out a 
connection for "pot holes" if you so desire! :-)


Bruce





-- 
Bruce Dumes			| "Bruce is too obsessed with the Beatles"   |
Stratus Computer, Inc.		|   --comment on report card from Spring '64 |
bad@sw.stratus.com              
508-460-2816
From: colm@mathcs.emory.edu (Colm Mulcahy)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: cover of "Come And Get It" on Apple?
Date: 5 Apr 92 20:09:01 GMT
Organization: sometimes, but never early in the morning


you all know the Macca song that Badfinger recorded.

i'm told that somebody else covered it, on Apple, in the early 70s.

a gaggle of quasi-famous musicos (possibly includining Denny
Laine & Elton John), probably released under some
anonymous name.


the story i belive, the Apple part i'm not so sure about
(surely I'd have run into it somewhere by now, maybe not)


if anybody knows about tis, please email me, thanks



-- 
Colm Mulcahy, W2,        |  I post, therefore I exist.  I think.  However,
Hinter Der Grieb 8,      |  "rlogging in" is slow, so I don't read news.
8400 Regensburg,         | 
German Occupied Bavaria  |  But I do read email, so fire away.   
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: cpeters@cse.unl.edu (Corey Peters)
Subject: All Those Years Ago
Organization: University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 03:25:19 GMT


I don't mean to restart an old thread, but about a month or so ago, there
was some discussion over George Harrison's "All Those Years Ago."  Recently,
I picked up the compact disc, and I remembered that Ringo and Paul both 
helped out with the recording in some way but can't remember just how.  The 
liner notes were of absolutely no help at all either.  If someone could
please e-mail me about this, I would really appreciate it

Thanks....

Corey Peters
cpeters@cse.unl.edu
--
Corey L. Peters			cpeters@cse.unl.edu	
"The Kingfish"			asmb27@platte.unl.edu
From: rgranvil@bbn.com (Robert A. Granville)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Hey Bulldog
Date: 10 Apr 92 13:06:15 GMT
Reply-To: rgranvil@vax.bbn.com (Robert A. Granville)
Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com


Since some people out there seem to love making transcripts of the
untranscribable (we've already done the runoff groove of Sgt. Pepper's
Lonely Hearts Club Band, as well as "Revolution No. 9"), would anyone
care to attempt the chatter towards the end of "Hey Bulldog"? Despite
having the album for over 20 years (which places me, alas, far from
contention as the youngest r.m.ber), I just noticed recently that one
of the bits said is "Don't look at me man! I already have
grandchildren." (A great line for a .sig file, as soon as it's true.) 

Rob Granville
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: edc@evolution.bchs.uh.edu (edward s. chen)
Subject: Re: linda is dead (or was that Paul?)
Organization: Little to none, or maybe not......
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 17:50:03 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.094058.13110@mic.ucla.edu> dmaclaug@agsm.ucla.edu (saki) writes:
>In article <9204082254.AA16291@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> hymowitz@SERVER.CS.JHU.EDU writes:
>
>Perish the thought. I'm one who still refers to Mr. McCartney's wife
>as "Linda Eastman." :-) Linda's intellect never struck me as particularly
>admirable, nor Mr. McCartney's sense of Beatles history entirely accurate
>(he has the revisionist heart of a true publicity hound). Learning Fabs'
>lore at Macca's knee sounds like a daunting prospect; witness his mangling
>of the Pete Best debacle in Lewisohn's introduction to "Recording Sessions".
>

*heavens*, not Linda bashing from our favorite local resident expert...

Define "intellect"?  Linda is really nothing more, or nothing less then
the woman Paul had always wanted.  A wife, and a mother to Paul's children.
A role Jane Asher refused to play.  In addition to that, her skills with the
camera never left *me* with the impression of an ignorant woman.  Perhaps
taking care of the children, recording with the band, *and* keeping everyone
well fed (although Rose did do the housecleaning :-) left her with little
time for more intellectual things.  Further, *she* is the driving force in
the McCartney's recent turn toward environmentalism.  Her (solo) interviews
during the '89 - '90 tour left an impression upon me of her dedication to that
cause, her love for her husband, and her deep belief in "animal rights."  
Certainly not a woman who does not have "the capacity for rational or 
intelligent thought"  (as Webster defines "intellect")

>
>Sorry, Mr. Hymowitz. You're batting 0 for 2. So far I've refused your
>undoubtedly kind offers to be a candidate for president or to be Linda.
>But if you're offering the curatorship of the British Museum, I'll
>sign up right now. 

ahhh, but how else could Linda know about you during the recent "Paul never
existed" hoax? :-)

<ESC>


-- 
ou est le soleil, dans la tete, Travaillez.
                                    -- Paul McCartney
From: mousktr@milton.u.washington.edu (Denise Lockner)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Another Damn Poll
Date: 16 Apr 92 19:06:43 GMT
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle


I know it's not a Beatles song, but IMHO one of the most beautiful
songs John ever wrote was "Beautiful Boy."  It contains one of the
best lines he ever wrote: "Life is what happens to you while
you're busy making other plans."   Just my $0.02.

-Denise "I got a job in Critter Country for the summer"
*******
"If you can't say something nice...don't say nothin' at all." -THUMPER
From: tjehl@wilgus.intel.Com (Timothy Jehl)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Lennon song
Date: 10 Apr 92 16:45:23 GMT
Reply-To: tjehl@sedona.intel.com
Organization: Intel Corporation.
Originator: tjehl@wilgus


In article <1992Apr7.094429.7748@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>, ireland@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com writes:
|> "The way things are goin', they're gonna' crucify me.". From "The Ballad
|> of John and Yoko". Originally released as a single, and to the best of my
|> knowledge, the only album release was on the "Blue Album" set (sort of a
|> greatest Beatle hits for 1967 to 1970).

   Also available on the American album release called "Hey Jude", and the
Past Masters Vol. 2 cd release.
From: hartigse@fe638.cc.purdue.edu (Scott Hartig)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: BeatleTrivia
Date: 8 Apr 92 21:16:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: mentor.44501
Distribution: usa
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center

In article <1992Apr8.184759.27654@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> jruiz@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Jose Ruiz) writes:
>
>     Another Trivia question for all you experts:
>
>     What color are the cellophane flowers that are "towering over your head"?

Oh brother.  Who do you think you're dealing with here, Jose?  Let's try 
one.

What song did Paul play a fuzz bass on? (Hint: Rubber Soul)

---------=---------=---------=---------=---------=----------=-------=
Scott E. Hartig
Purdue University Schools of Engineering
West Lafayette, IN


"The sum of the world's intelligence is a constant.....
                ....the population is growing"       

                        -H.L Mencken


GO HOOSIERS!!!!!

---------=---------=---------=---------=---------=----------=-------=
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: edc@evolution.bchs.uh.edu (edward s. chen)
Subject: Re: linda's IQ
Organization: Little to none, or maybe not......
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 21:16:54 GMT

In article <1992Apr13.181832.11748@unx.sas.com> sastxb@weevil.unx.sas.com (Thomas Bednarek) writes:
>In article <1992Apr9.222020.22326@mic.ucla.edu>, dmaclaug@agsm.ucla.edu (saki) writes:

>	BTW, the tapes I heard from the recent Paul shows (with only
>Linda's vocals) were hideous. This is not really a comment on her
>intelligence, but it grated on me enough to lose objectivity. Sort
>of like bagism ...

To kill another known false rumor:

The tapes of "Linda singing" are *not* her.  They have been alternatively
identified as coming from Knebworth, Liverpool, and Chicago.  They are not
from any of those shows.   Additionally, some disc jockeys have admitted to
perpetrating the hoax.  They intentionally sang as poorly as possible into
a hand held microphone.  Pete Townshend has said (not jokingly) that he would
like to produce a Linda solo album. oh well...

Defending Beatle wives for as long as I can remember,

<ESC>

-- 
I want a short-haired girl (who) sometimes wears it twice as long
                                               -- George Harrison
From: schauerte@larry.gmr.com (Frank Schauerte)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Because Beethoven
Date: 7 Apr 92 20:30:40 GMT
Organization: et
Originator: schauerte@larry.gmr.com

The following quote is from Mark Lewisohn's book
   The Beatles:Recording Sessions

"`Because' was one of the most beautiful of all
Beatles recordings, an exquisite three-part
harmony venture, and it was pure Lennon,
excepting, that is, a little influence from
Ludwig Van Beethoven. It was Beethoven's piano
sonata in C Sharp minor, opus 27 number two (`The
Moonlight Sonata') which inspired `Because'.
Yoko was playing it on the piano one day and 
John, in clearly inspirational mood, reversed
the chords, added some simple but eloquent lyrics
and the song was written. As simple as that."
-- 


Frank Schauerte--E and Electronics E Dept
General Motors Research Labs;    email=>schauerte@gmr.com
From: andy@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Andy Clews)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Dudley Moore/George Martin connection?
Date: 6 Apr 92 11:31:44 GMT
Organization: University of Sussex

From article <1992Apr4.152949.1206@mic.ucla.edu>, by dmaclaug@agsm.ucla.edu (saki):
> Peter Cook and Dudley Moore. Cook and Moore
> became a team in the early sixties and betook themselves to film, TV,
> and a series of recordings for Decca. Their "Derek and Clive" material
> (which, my album warns, should not be played in the presence of minors),
                                                                  ^^^^^^
I'm sure I remember the spelling as being "miners" on the copies I saw
in the shops...

Given the strength of the language on this album, I am sure it could
easily have offended even subterranean workpersons - who are not
normally noted for their erudite phraseology - let alone persons of a
tender and impressionable age :-)

-- 
Andy Clews, Computing Service, Univ. of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, England
JANET: andy@uk.ac.sussex.syma      OTHER NETWORKS: andy@syma.sussex.ac.uk
From: deryl@waikato.ac.nz
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: BeatleTrivia
Date: 9 Apr 92 08:44:51 +1200
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

In article <1992Apr8.125737.20864@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, jruiz@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Jose Ruiz) writes:
> 
>      O.K.  Since you're all Beatle experts out there, answer this one:
> 
>           How many holes does it take to fill the Albert Hall?



Uummm.... how about 1 really big one, or lots of little ones!?
From: kp@cc.uow.edu.au (Karen Pepper)
Subject: Nothing to do with the Beatles at all
Organization: University Of Wollongong
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 05:32:06 GMT

brennan@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Joseph Brennan) writes:

>>* Karen Pepper                  *                                     *
>>* Moth Wrangler and Stylist     *  " Oh my God - the chips ! "        *
>>*                               *      - The Reverend Edward          *
>>* kp@wampyr.cc.uow.edu.au       *          Lambert-Carter & Reggie    *

>Since the above is on my screen-- perhaps I should ask the question on
>so many rmb minds these days, viz. who are The Rev Lambert-Carter and
>Reggie?  Folks worth knowing about in the Northern Hemisphere, or am I
>perhaps better off in my ignorance?  

The Reverend is an Anglican vicar (a real one) who appears in a
cat food commercial on TV. Reggie is the cat.

The quote is actually from a completely different but equally stupid
commercial for insurance, which features a woman who burns her house 
down with a saucepan of potato chips.


-- 
* Karen Pepper                  *                                     *
* Moth Wrangler and Stylist     *  " Oh my God - the chips ! "        *
*                               *      - The Reverend Edward          *
* kp@wampyr.cc.uow.edu.au       *          Lambert-Carter & Reggie    *
From: bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Brian Harvey)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Discography
Date: 15 Apr 1992 15:56:40 GMT
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.cs.berkeley.edu

rgranvil@vax.bbn.com (Robert A. Granville) writes:
: The following is the LP discography for the Beatles for the USA and
: the UK, compiled from "The Compleat Beatles" up to early 1980.
:  [...]
: USA
: Introducing the Beatles (Vee Jay) 7/63
: Meet the Beatles! 1/64
: The Beatles' Second Album 4/64
: A Hard Day's Night (United Artists) 6/64
: Something New 7/64
: The Beatles vs. the Four Seasons (Vee Jay) 10/64
:   also released as Songs, Pictures, and Stories of the Fabulous Beatles
:   (Vee Jay) 10/64
: Beatles '65 12/64
: The Early Beatles 3/65
: Beatles VI 6/65
:  [...]

Wasn't "The Beatles Story" in there somewhere?  It's an interview album
released on Capitol and I didn't buy it so I don't remember exactly when
it came out.
From: kirk@cs.duke.edu (Scooter Corleone)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: "Blisters on my fingers..." (was Re: SHAVED FISH)
Date: 15 Apr 92 17:38:55 GMT
Organization: The Zymurgy Institute

In article <1992Apr11.210418.9878@en.ecn.purdue.edu> prokopy@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Dave) writes:
>In article <4765@krafla.rhi.hi.is>, gaukur@rhi.hi.is (Kristjan Gaukur Kristjansson) writes:
>> In <7APR199220090947@vms2.iscs.nus.sg> fanyl@vms2.iscs.nus.sg (FAN YENG LOON) writes:
>> 
>> >"I've got blisters on my fingers!" - Ringo
>> 
>> I always thought that the blisters were John's... are they really Ringo's???
>
>Yup.  It's been assumed for ages that that was John's screaming voice
>(as it sounds like him, and that's the kind of thing he would say...),
>but it IS Ringo...  Sorry to burst your bubble..

I'd always heard it was Ringo, and that the reason he was saying this was
that the song was originally 24 minutes long or something...and it sounds
like Ringo to *me*...

No worries,

Scooter Corleone

--
more .signature
This has been a test of the emergency butthead system.
From: nahas1@husc8.harvard.edu (Stephanie Nahas)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Another one of those damn polls
Date: 16 Apr 92 15:37:00 GMT
Article-I.D.: husc3.1992Apr16.113703.11159
Organization: Harvard University Science Center

In article <16APR199206302636@vms2.iscs.nus.sg> fanyl@vms2.iscs.nus.sg (Fan Yeng Loon) writes:
>>>	I'll have to think about the first question for a while, but for
>>>pure lyrical brilliance, I'll vote for "Across the Universe."  Marvelous
>>>song, and Lennon was right:  it should have been recorded better and with
>>>more care...the lyrics deserve it.
>>> 
>>>			Nat Pearson
>>>			raindrop@leland.stanford.edu
>
>I'll second that!!  The song is simply poetic in nature.  Personally, I prefer 
>the Wildlife version because I love hearing those birds lifting off (it kinda 
>stir up a visual effect for the theme.)
>
>-applecore-
>"I've got blisters on my fingers!" - Ringo
>fanyl@iscs.nus.sg | fanyl@nusdiscs.bitnet

Uh oh, looks like we've got another bandwagon on the trail. Well, I'M 
not going to hitch a ride! :-)

I'll hold off on no. 1 til I find a real doozy. But as for no 2.: I've
always loved the "I Am the Walrus" lyrics. A few other lines I get a kick
out of: "Sitting on the sofa with a sister or two," "My advice for those 
who die / Declare the pennies on your eyes," and, of course, "You know my
name, you know my number too / You know my number three, and you know me
number four, oh! / You know my name, you know my number too / You know my
name, you know my number, what's up with you? HA!"

Well, I've taken more than my share of votes, haven't I?

Bye, 
Steph
-- 
Stephanie Nahas            "I ate his liver with some fava beans
nahas1@husc.harvard.edu     and a nice Chiante. FTFTFTFTFTFT!" 
                                  --Hannibal Lechter
From: br387@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jason L. Pollack)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: What language...?
Date: 11 Apr 92 16:45:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: usenet.1992Apr11.164524.4985
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)


As I am new to r.m.b. I hope this isn't rehashing old threads, but--

Does anyone know the meaning of 'Jai Guru Deva Om' from Across The
Universe or the meaning of 'Ah bowa kawa pousse pousse' from
#9 Dream?  Are these made up lyrics?

Also, as long as I'm here I might as well ask why is it that Best of
Badfinger Vol. 2 is available on CD, but there is no Vol. 1?  Just
curious.

Thanks,

Jason P.
-------
From: kent_f1@verifone.com
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Lennon/McCartney
Date: 9 Apr 92 15:42:08 HST
Organization: VeriFone Inc., Honolulu HI

>(Maurizio  Codogno) writes: 
> from what I remember (maybe from the Book?), _Cry for a Shadow_ is
> credited Lennon-Harrison just because John wrote the standard lead and
> George the solo ... When they asked them who was to be credited, they had
> no idea that an instrumental song had indeed an authorship.

Sounds like a collaboration to me.  What do you mean "standard lead".
Are you saying there were others who contributed to the writing of this
song?  Paul?
From: Treefrog@cup.portal.com (Edward Thomas Keller)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: Another one of those damn polls
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 23:54:23 PDT
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <740015@hpwrce.HP.COM> <1992Apr15.025509.4054@leland.Stanford.EDU>
  <32927@darkstar.ucsc.edu>

mortal@ucscb.ucsc.edu writes:

>SO, in following a tradition that dates back at least to a couple of
>months ago, which was when I started reading rmb, I am asking for
>answers to the following survey questions:
>
>1) What is the worst original Beatles lyric (Ranging from a couple
>   words to a whole song. Whatever wrankles your hackles.) you've
>   heard?

Okay, let it be said that I love EVERY Beatles song; I feel their weaker
material is uplifted by the greatness of the rest.  HOWEVER :-), having
said that, this one lyrical bit has always seemed to me an obvious 2-second
toss-off:

        Little child, little child, little child won't you dance with me?
        I'm so sad and lonely.  Baby, take a chance with me.

Granted, they made no claims at sophistication in their early days, but
come on! :)  Then again, the lines from She's a Woman don't bother me
at all, so what do I know?

>2) What is the best?

Best is awfully tough. If I really allowed myself to list a whole song
as an option I'd be up wrestling with my opinion all night. So I'll limit
myself to what I'll call the best "lyrical bit" :-)

        He's well acquainted with the touch of the velvet hand
            like a lizard on a windowpane.
        The man in the crowd with the multicoloured mirrors
            on his hobnail boots,
        Lying with his eyes while his hands are busy working
            overtime.
        A soap impression of his wife, which he ate and donated
            to the National Trust.

        (from Happines is a Warm Gun, of course :)

>Post here, write me at mortal@ucscb.ucsc.edu, whatever, I'll post
>the results.

Well, I usually respond to polls by e-mail, but for some stupid reason
couldn't resist posting this one.  Thanks for your patience.

peace
Edward
************************************************************************
* "I would gladly risk feeling bad at times *  Edward Thomas Keller    *
*  if it also meant I could taste my        *  Treefrog@cup.portal.com *
*  dessert."                                *                          *
*            - Lt. Cmdr. Data               *      The Whethermen      *
*              ST:TNG                       *                          *
************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
From: greg@irl.ise.ufl.edu (Greg O'Rear)
Subject: Re: like, huh? (Re: READ #9154!!! (I forgot to put a subject...)
Reply-To: greg@ise.ufl.edu (Greg O'Rear)
Organization: Industrial Research Lab - Univ. of Florida
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 92 17:21:40 GMT

In article <randall.702349068@woof> randall@informix.com (Randall Rhea) writes:
>rlopez@loanstar.tamu.edu (Robert Lopez) writes:
>...
>>I have read they did get in trouble for using piecesparts of Glenn Miller's
>>In The Mood at the end of AYNiL, but I've never heard anything remotely like
>>Glenn Miller, so I just discounted what I'd read...
>
>Read -The Beatles Recording Sessions-.  "In The Mood" was edited out
>of the released version because it was discovered to be copyrighted.

I always thought the part of "In The Mood" used was the intro.  In "AYNIL",
you can hear two runs on the horns.  That's what I thought it was.  If I
remember the story, "In The Mood" was public domain, but the Miller arrangement
was not.  Martin also used some Bach (trumpet figures).  The Miller stuff is
mostly saxophone, I think.
--
Greg O'Rear
Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida
orear@ise.ufl.edu