HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Ankle bracelets
Date: 30 Dec 92 21:49:04 GMT
Organization: California-Nevada Methodist Homes

In article <93qJwB1w165w@netlink.cts.com> rcf@netlink.cts.com (Bob Forsythe) writes:
>kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi) writes:
>> In article <1992Dec24.172147.26637@clsi.COM>, kevin@clsi.COM (Kevin Cameron) 
>> > stevek@netcom.com (Steve Kile) writes:
>> Ankle bracelets are commonly used jewellery among females in India. I guess 
>     Actually, they've been around for a number years.  I can recall 
>     Naah; if you want sexy, you gotta go for the gold chain around the 
>waist.  I was shopping for one for a girlfriend once, and couldn't find 
>I rather hesitantly said that it wasn't for her neck, it was for her 
>waist.  Wham!  Salesclerk's nostrils flaired and her pupils dialated to 
>wide open.  She, at least, was *very* turned on by the idea.

Yeah, I can imagine that she was turned on by the
idea.  I think I know what she was thinking about.  I've a 
couple of examples where females would get their nipples
pierced and have nipple rings installed.  These rings are
then connected by a loose chain that hangs between the breasts.
However, another variation on this "theme", is to have the 
nipple rings connected to a chain around the waist, which, in turn,
is connected to an ankle bracelet.  This provides some intriguing
stares when people see a chain connected to an ankle bracelet running
up a leg and under a skirt to "who knows where".  A great conversation
piece.   Just to finish this thread with another example, I've
also seen where females will pierce their nipples, and their
"clits", and connect all three with a chain.  Quite painful to
look at, IMO.  
--Keith
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Being Loved
Date: 23 Dec 1992 13:33:48 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Dec9.132632.29783@netcom.com> aahz@netcom.com (Mean Green Dancing Machine) writes:
>Please to for "love" a better definition give.

Yoda?  Is that you?  Are you still with us after all these centuries?
From: stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Date: 26 Dec 92 19:47:32 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

daniel@clsi.COM (Daniel S. Barclay) writes:

>stef@Apple.COM (Stef Jones) writes:
>> Although
>> there are fewer women than men on the net, and so you might expect the men
>>                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> to pursue all the more vigorously and the women to be even more passive, in
>> fact what you find is that the women take the initiative more frequently 
>> than apparently they do in society at large.

>Why? (Did I miss something?  I mean something regarding this post. :-) )

What kind of pursuit behavior would *you* expect in such a situation?
-- 
Stef                Just as there are laws of Conservation of Matter and
stef@apple.com      Energy, so there are in fact Laws of Conservation of 
                    Pain and Joy. Neither can ever be created or destroyed.
                         But one can be converted into the other. 
                                                         --Spider Robinson
From: comp_oper@darwin.ntu.edu.au (Glenn Wallace)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Over 40 and single....Anyone that "OLD"?
Date: 23 Dec 92 18:05:44 +0900

In article <1ghthrINNa8p@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, aa752@cleveland.Freenet.Edu
  (Louise Billi) writes:
> Over 40 (just a tad) women have a terrible time of it.
> Men in that age group are all looking for the young "Tenderoni"
> to make him feel like a kid again.  Can't men realize that 
> most younger women see them as either a "Father Figure" or
> a "Sugar Daddy"?  Is that what they really want in a mate?
> 
> And it is sad today that wrinkles on a woman mean she is OLD, 
> yet on a man, they add character.  This 'youth oriented' 
> culture leaves the over 40 woman out in the cold.

Don't let it get you down.  There are a number of men out there, including
myself, who are not necessarily "youth oriented" and would seriously consider
and even prefer an older woman for a serious ongoing relationship.


Why is it that all the interesting women I know are either too tall, too
married (or otherwise attached) or too far away?
-- 
Glenn Wallace					comp_oper@darwin.ntu.edu.au
Northern Territory University
Darwin, Northern Territory,
Australia, World, Universe, etc...
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: R9S@ECL.PSU.EDU (Roberto G Sung)
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Organization: Penn State Engineering Computer Lab
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 93 20:03:26 GMT
X-News-Reader: VMS NEWS 1.24

> In article <1hiaj3INN5n9@uwm.edu> markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
> >In article <oneil.725199192@cwis> oneil@cwis.unomaha.edu (Sharon O'Neil) writes:
> >>tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:
> >>Nah.  I think that the guys that they were inviting over were jerks because
> >>they wouldn't have considered these girls for various reasons, including
> >>the fact that they weren't fashion model lookalikes.  They weren't 
> >>unattractive, but they weren't Christie Brinkley either.
				   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Alright, am i the only guy dumb enough to ask who this woman is?
sounds like she would probably be a public figure, in which case i can't
possibly find her that much attractive since the pre-condition to my
finding a person attractive is that she finds me attractive also.
yeah, i know, sometimes this reciprocity criterion leads to an infinite loop
(or dead lock if you prefer) and life isn't as colorful as some novels
paint it. but i'd rather stay on the safe side; cautiousness is better than
being hurt upon displaying unrequisited interest.

> >I think it's time to let you in on a few secrets.  Men don't consider Christie
> >Brinkley attractive.  One, she's married (last I heard).  Two, she looks too
> >much like a TV spokesmodel, family-oriented platonic beauty in all its
> >blandness.  Three, women are the only ones I ever hear referring to her as
> >attractive, which just goes to prove that you really have to be a man to know
> >what turns on a man.

you spoke up for me, Mark. thanks. it bugs me at times as how people can
be attracted to a 2-D image. no doubt at all that the media, the entertainment
industries and the fashion agencies are doing their best to sell these
images and quite frankly they are very BEAUTIFUL indeed. but they are
what they are, images. human emotions, examplified by attraction here, are much
more subjective and complex than the ephemeral feeling of ecstasy
errr.. i mean euphoria.. wait, make it pleasure, or maybe comfort, oh well,
you know what i mean.
From: jmd@bear.com (Josh Diamond)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
Date: 30 Dec 92 15:13:11 GMT
	<16109@auspex-gw.auspex.com>
	<1992Dec29.223307.12173@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: Bear, Stearns & Co. - FAST
In-reply-to: tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu's message of 29 Dec 92 22:33:07 GMT



In article <1992Dec29.223307.12173@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> tlode@nyx.cs.du.edu (trygve lode) writes:

   In article <16109@auspex-gw.auspex.com> johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira) writes:
   >In article <1992Dec29.054837.3942@mtu.edu> rossi@mtu.edu (Rossi) writes:
   >>In article (Sandra Loosemore) writes:
   >|>markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark) writes:
   >|>
   >|>   Cory Everson is perfection.
   >
   >Who?

   Cory Everson is a several-time Ms. Olympia winner and is one of the best
   female bodybuilders of all time; she's cute, but I wouldn't call her
   perfection.  (She shares the unusual distinction with Tom Platz of having
   thighs larger around than their waists.)

Ugh!  How grotesque!

Different strokes for different folks, eh?

--
You don't hunt ducks with a turnip! 

 /\ \  / /\  Josh Diamond                                          jmd@bear.com
//\\ .. //\\ AKA Spidey!!!                        ...!ctr.columbia.edu!ursa!jmd
//\((  ))/\\
/  < `' >  \                                              Do whatever it takes.
From: keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Fetishes?
Date: 24 Dec 92 00:20:05 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: California-Nevada Methodist Homes

In article <1992Dec22.201616.21392@netcom.com> cocoa@netcom.com writes:
>Well, I also have this thing about whipped cream and toes.  Can't go much
>Just me,
>little 'e'

Oh gosh!  Where were you six months ago??? I could fulfill your
fantasy, provided those toes belong to feet size 6 or less. 


--Keith				Happy Holidays
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Giving up good girls, looking for "bad" ones
Date: 30 Dec 1992 04:53:01 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4

In article <1992Dec29.213509.26642@CERIS.Purdue.EDU> dheisler@CERIS.Purdue.EDU (Dave Heisler) writes:
>after fairly dismal luck in meeting good women and
>converting them to SO's, i'm considering chasing
>"bad" ones.
>
>Does anyone have some good hints ?

Write sizzling hot female-oriented lovemaking stories, and soon the
irresistable draw of your verbal magnetism will make the bad girls start
chasing you, homing in on you like love-seeking missiles.  And you will have
no defenses to ward off this relentless pursuit and will be utterly helpless
to stop the inevitable joining.  At this point, only intervening distance or
an intervening boyfriend/husband/fiancee can save you -- and even then that
doesn't always help.

Alternatively, if you are impatient, this manner of verbal enticement can be
refined to a certain 7 word sequence which, unfortunately, you will have to
determine by trial and error.
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.somance,alt.romance.chat,alt.conspiracy
From: apb.4819@nd.edu (voluptua love)
Subject: Re: Blatant FrienshShipBraceLetMongering
Organization: University of Notre Dame
Distribution: alt.romance.chat
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 06:19:05 GMT

In article <1992Dec28.020642.18008@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
>Subject: Blatant FrienshShipBraceLetMongering
>Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 02:06:42 GMT

>nance@cbnewsd.cb.att.com (nancy.l.colucci) writes:
>] 
>] I don't know about fads, but my most recent hobby that has actually
>] made me some money at craft shows is those floss friendship bracelets.
>] 
>] Anybody wants a sample, send a SASE (Self-addressed stamped envelope)
>] to:
>] 
>] AT&T Bell Labs
>] 2000 N. Naperville Road
>] Naperville, Illinois  60566-7033
>] 
>] Attn:  Nancy Colucci   5B-430
>] 
>] And let me know whether its for ankle or wrist and what colors are
>] preferred.  I'll fill as many requests as I have stock ....


>I am JUST SHOCKED! that ahyone would SOOOOOOOO Crassly utilize
>the net to engage in this sort of Blatant Capitalist Oppression,
>and that with such a BrazenCulturallyMyopicPerspective as to
>engage in foisting the Symbols of a WhiteMaleSexistGenocidalWarMongerIsm
>as 'friendship bracelets'!!!!!


>I Can NOT believe that you could be so CRUEL and Heartless!

>I am JUST SHOCKED!!!!!


>Clearly It is time for you to be Re_educated!!!!!


>ciao
>drieux




>-- 
>Modern Day Problems:

>This is Not a .sigfile addendum to the Post.
>You are just reading beyond the edge.






what is happening to our aussie friend in 11 days?

and does she really live in the coombs building,

that symbol of canberra soullessness?

remember, i love you all too much to say, too much
for my tiny body to keep inside me, and forever
and forever, till the mountains crumble into the
sea...

c'est moi encore, pour vous seulement,

*voluptua love*
	
 
------------------------------------------
voluptua love
University of Notre Dame
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: dtorok@nynexst.com (David Torok)
Subject: Re: Any Available Jewish Men Out There??
Organization: NYNEX Science & Technology, Inc.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 92 16:53:01 GMT

: 
Shelley writes:
: "I'm surrounded by Christians", (an appropriate day to post this
: message, huh?!), _Please_ someone help me!!
:                             Shelley

tmcinern@newcomer.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Timothy McInerney x0 14-2) writes:
: 	Well, call me crazy Shelley, but did you ever consider dating someone
: 	who, (GASP), wasn't Jewish?
: 
: 	If you haven't, grow up and start living in the twentith century, 
: 	before it becomes the twenty first!
: 
: 	If you have and still insist on your archaic basis for mating, try
: 	Isreal.

I don't find wanting to limit "mating circles" based on ethnic, cultural,
religious, appearance or whatever to be "archaic."  It's a person's choice.
Especially when one is considering marriage, common culture or 
beliefs may be very important to an individual. Such selectiveness may be
related to the way the person was brought up, or may be a conscious decision
after X years of dating people from all walks of life. So, Tim, I don't find
fair your comments towards Shelley.

On the other hand, I don't find the "I'm surrounded by Christians" comment
too appropriate -- it borders on carrying prejudiced meaning. Sorry, Shelley.

Jews are perhaps
10% of the population overall, more in some cities and less in others.
Accepting this fact might be difficult for Shelley (especially in Des Moines
where there seems to be a small Jewish community).  Tim's suggestion of going
to Israel would certainly have the desired effect of potentially more people
for Shelley to date.  However, I'm sure that one of many other LARGER cities,
even with the same percentage, will increase the pool.  Try Seattle.  or San
Francisco, or Atlanta, or Boston, or DC, or...etc.


-=$>Dave<$=-
-- 
David Torok, NYNEX Science & Technology, 914-644-2378 Fax: 914-644-2404
500 Westchester Ave, White Plains, NY 10604  "torok@nynexst.com"  Juggle!
From: loosemore-sandra@cs.yale.edu (Sandra Loosemore)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: SF ISO S*M
Date: 22 Dec 92 15:05:06 GMT
	<264@cnmhnet.UUCP>
Distribution: usa
Organization: staff hacker @ Yale Haskell project
NNTP-Posting-Host: functor.systemsz.cs.yale.edu
In-reply-to: keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP's message of 21 Dec 92 23:13:10 GMT

keithg@cnmhnet.UUCP (keith garrard) writes:

   If you get a woman in her 30's who has been living on her own for a
   while, and who is independent, then you might as well forget her.
   She is used to doing what she wants when she wants, and she won't
   be interested in a man tying her down.  Whereas, women in their
   20's are usually more adventurous , and in the mood to try
   anything.

Isn't this a bit of an overgeneralization?  Speaking for myself, I was
definitely *much* more focused about my goals in life and concerned
about avoiding being "tied down" or having to compromise about what I
wanted when I was in my 20's (and even as a teenager) than I am now.
But after going through some more or less tramautic experiences around
the time I left grad school I've become less self-absorbed, less
concerned with fixed goals, and more willing to take things as they
come.  Oh yes, more cynical too.  :-)

   They are definitely more appealing also, as their skin hasn't
   developed that "leathery feel" due to years of being in the sun.

On the other hand, some of us haven't spent the past decade doing
nothing but roasting in the sun.

-Sandra the cynic
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,soc.penpals
From: rossi@mtu.edu (Rossi)
Subject: Re: Do you have a good pickup line?
Organization: Michigan Technological University
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 18:00:13 GMT

In article <1993Jan1.070555.2243@mtu.edu> bacon@mtu.edu (Jeff Bacon) writes:
>>
>>"Know any good pickup lines?"
>
>I like this one. it's...good for us confused types. :)
>
>-bacon

   Well it kinda leaves the possibility of infinite recursion hangin
out there.  You may never make it past this point.  But the asking
of a more open ended question that requires some thought and gets
the intended out of the "I'll say anything to get you out of my face"
automatic response mode is a good start.

   songbird -

Finding the setting down part much more confusing than the picking up.
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: mel@niblick.ecn.purdue.edu (Meloney D Cregor)
Subject: Re: Attraction -> Acquiantance or vice versa?
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 23:03:10 GMT

In article <1992Dec21.211848.18985@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> jsmt@troi.cc.rochester.edu (Julia Smith) writes:
>Not at all.  It would be just as ridiculous to argue that all men
>are exactly the same by virtue of their plumbing.  I have met enough
>boys who's only claim to manhood is their ability to piss standing up -
>it just aint enough to bet the ranch on.

Insufficient criteria.

The REAL test is can they write their name in the snow?
The beauty of the test is that it shows not only manhood, but
literacy and dexterity, as well.

--
 Stuffed deer heads on walls are bad enough, but it's worse when they
are wearing dark glasses and have streamers and ornaments in their
antlers because then you know they were enjoying themsleves at a party 
when they were shot.                   --  Ellen DeGeneris
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: This Intelligence Difference Thing
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 12:54:08 GMT


WAS: Subject: Re: Women: would you go out with a man dumber than you?

Ok folks, its time for uncle drieux to explain the facts of life,
again.


1. Never go out with anyone you will have to debrief.

2. never get emotionally involved with anyone you will
have to terminate for reasons of national security.

3. Never get involved with anyone involved in your
branch of the intelligence service.

4. NEVER EVER get involved with anyone involved in THEIR
branch of the intelligence service.

5. When In wonder, when in doubt, shoot first.

6. Never BELIEVE them when they say they are in this 
For the SEX! Its an Old Gambit, first the Orgasm, 
then the Selective Viewing of possible intelligence sources....

7. this Number left intentionally Blank for
Reasons of National Security.

8. When in wonder, when in doubt, Presume they are
BrainWaveSuckingSpaceAliens, or Commies.

9. If they Know the Password, Kill them Anyway,
they could have compromised a Source.

10. Never Believe them when they say they are NOT
in it for the SEX. They are IN IT FOR THE SEX!
{cf. 6 above for details.}



ciao
drieux


-- 
Modern Day Problems:

This is Not a .sigfile addendum to the Post.
You are just reading beyond the edge.
From: johnf@Auspex.COM (John Fereira)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Help, Want Singles Ski Club in Northern NJ
Date: 23 Dec 92 18:15:01 GMT
Organization: Auspex Systems, Inc.

In article <1992Dec22.175758.27315@pica.army.mil> schico@PICA.ARMY.MIL (Stephen Chico (CCH) <schico>) writes:
|In article <102842@netnews.upenn.edu> crawford@ben.dev.upenn.edu (Lauren L. Crawford) writes:
|>In article <1992Dec21.164644.1059@walter.bellcore.com> tjj@nomas.bellcore.com writes:
|>
|>>Hi, 
|>>Can anybody give me the name of a popular singles ski club in New Jersey.
|>
|>This is the first I've heard that there were any hills in New Jersey. 
|>What would these folks do, ski down each other's driveways?  Or are we
|>talking about water skiing in the middle of December?
|
|I have heard of High Life Ski Club in Denville, NJ. 
|Singles? 

Or either a bunch of stoners or "high" refers to the altitude.

|But many people who have time and $s to Ski are single.
 
True.  With the price of lift tickets these days taking a family skiing
can be rather pricey.  I remember skiing for $5 a day midweek.  

|We do too have ski places in NJ.  
|They are big mountians too, well the lift tickets cost the same as at big
|mountians and you get what you pay for. Right?
|There is some very challanging skiing too.  The average person density on
|the slopes is about 1 person per square meter thus requiring turning ability 
|that rivals any olimpic slalom skier. 

Over in rec.skiing this is a significant factor in what is referred to as
the "dork factor" of a ski resort. 

|Great place to meet people!  One can fall in love in a lift line. 

Or lust at least.  Tight ski pants have a way of doing that.

There are several reasons why snow skiing is a good way to meet a MOTAS.

It's a common activity that people enjoy and if you meet someone you have
at least that much in common.

The afformentioned tight ski pants.

It's actually encouraged for you to announce that you are single. (For 
non-skiers, most ski chairs hold two people and if you're skiing by yourself
or with a odd number of people you're supposed to pair up with someone on
the chair.  The way to do this is to shout "single" when you come up to
the the end of the ski line.  With proper timing you can arrive at the
liftline at the same time as the person in the tight ski pants.)

The whole object of skiing is to "go down".

-- 
+==========================================================================+
| John Fereira        | Auspex Systems | "Ask me about my vow of silence." |
| johnf@auspex.com    | Santa Clara CA |                                   |
+==========================================================================+
Newsgroups: soc.singles
From: tps@jptcs.COM (Tim Sailer)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: on the job
Date: 23 Dec 92 18:19:05 GMT
Organization: JPT Computer Solutions
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]

Pally Hoffstein (pally@mikejag.wimsey.bc.ca) wrote:
: Most e-mail I've recieved on the topic are along the lines of "GO FOR IT!" but
: "GO SLOW!". I'll go for it but I'll use my head.

Just make sure that you use the one on your shoulders! :) :)

-- 
Tim Sailer
JPT Computer Solutions - SCO Sales/Consulting/Administration and Mangling
PO Box 423 Mt Sinai, NY 11766
(516) 331-9001
Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.flame
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Subject: Re: Leave me out
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 20:22:21 GMT
Organization: Our Lady of Heavy Artillery
Followup-To: soc.singles

In article <1261@dsbc.icl.co.uk>, kev@dsbc.icl.co.uk (Kevin Walsh) wrote:
> 
> Good lord, being compared to that Darcy character, the shame of it.

Heh.

"The weed of extreme stupidity bears bitter fruit..."

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.