HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M)
Subject: Re: Cowboys/Eagles will be a tough one
Reply-To: dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 15:31:25 GMT

In article <1993Jan7.012426.2800@wam.umd.edu> macole@wam.umd.edu (The Dude) writes:
>In article <1993Jan6.163111.1@vaxb.acs.unt.edu> asif@vaxb.acs.unt.edu writes:
>>Cowboys Eagles game, my thoughts.
>>================================
>>
>>This will be a tough ball game for both the teams. For Dallas the key will be
>>stopping the run , Sherman looked good against New Orleans. It will be good for
>>Dallas if Haley can get some penetration on third down passing situations. For
>>Eagles, they have to STOP Emmitt, both as a runner and a receiver in the back
>>field. Emmitt can be dangerous on a one on one situation in the back field.
>>Randall will have to scramble succeessfully and not fumble the football. 	
>>think the game will be decided on who turns the ball over more than the other.
>>Kicking game will be important. Maybe the game will be decided late fourth
>>quarter on a Elliot field goal or a Sikahema punt return, who knows.
>>
>>As a Dallas fan I would have liked to see Minnesota or Redskins in Texas
>>Stadium over the Eagles. Not because I am scared of Eagles or anything but
>>because these two teams match up very well. Both Dallas and Eagles will have to
>>be at the top of their games to be succeessful this Sunday. We are very excited
>>here in Dallas about our cowboys and we hope they win this weekend. Good luck
>>to both the teams. May the best team win.
>>
>AWWWW C'mon...I want some bashing..."May the best team win"???  You're
>softening up all that good mudraking and thrashing that I had to weed through
>for days.  Next thing you'll say is "It's just a game..."!  
>
>Take note...bashing scoring as follows...
>
>Eagles fans -> 28 (some good comments about irrelevant subjects prominent in
>		   the scoring)
>Dallas fans -> 14 (you guys are too soft, this analytical stuff is keeping us
>		   down...gotta be less fair..kill, kill, kill)
>
>S.F. fans -> 7 (need more fan support on the net...you're letting these guys
>		walk all over you)

Perhaps this is because 49er fans got tired of being accused of being
woofers, whiners, etc.  They decided to be cool and calm - KNOWING that
their team is the best and will win ring #5! :-)
(It may also be that the 49ers are playing a team Washington, that is
respected in the Bay Area.  A good team with a fine coach and organization.
Sounds a bit the the 49ers themselves!)

>
>Others -> who cares...AFC is irrelevant and I live with Skin fans...heard enough
>	  from them.
>
>This is my way of saying that the above article has good points and is the 
>essence of competition..blah...blah...blah...blah.
>
>Mario
>
>By the way...where is Mr. Football Crap?  Hmm...I guess he enrolled in grammar
>school.
>-- 
>Mario A. Cole			     |  HJ Ford Associates Incorporated
>macole@wam.umd.edu		     |  1111 Jeff Davis Hwy Suite 808
>University of Maryland College Park  |  Crystal City, Arlington, VA 22202
>(301) 868-9249 		             |  (703) 553-5580


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: bsmith@crustacean.osf.org (Bruce Smith)
Subject: Re: Greatest Moment 
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 22:57:11 GMT

In article <JOHNDOE93Jan7.164434@samadams.inmet> johndoe@inmet.com (Bus error - core dumped) writes:
>>
>from an unbiased fan's standpoint, for all time greatest moments for a team
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>and the game, i think you have to also remember the following:
>
>	- alan ameche carrying the football into the end zone, the baltimore

>	- the immaculate reception:  at once one of the most controversial

>	- cleveland kicking the winning field goal to win the championship

>	- the saints returning the opening kickoff for a td in their first

How well I remember Alan Ameche's TD! Far from impartial, I had become a
Giants fan at the age of 11 (It was 1958, wasn't it?). We lived in Atlanta, GA
at the time, and in those days the "home" team was -- believe it or not --
the Redskins! The Falcons weren't even a gleam in anyone's eye then. The
center of football attention was, of course, the Georgia Tech team. 

Anyway, although I initially rooted for the Redskins, I soon switched my
allegiance to my hometown boys, the Giants. I watched that championship game
with my friend Bud, and I remember feeling crushed when Ameche scored. 
 
I am never truly unbiased when I watch a game, since I either genuinely prefer
one of the teams, or I choose the one I dislike least, or perhaps my choice
will be determined by how the outcome of the game will affect my #1 team in
the playoff hunt (with the Pats lately, that's not much of a factor). For
example, although I despise both the Redskins and Niners, I will root for the
Skins this weekend. Why? I'm not sure. I guess I despise them less at present.

I'd be interested to know if other r.s.f.p 'ers always choose a team to root
for in a given game, or whether some of us are really impartial at times. 
I did participate in a pool for the regular season, which made it easy to 
pick a team, but I would've taken sides in any game I watched, anyway.


Bruce Smith
From: gaf5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (Gail A. Fullman)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Chris Dishman's whining
Date: 6 Jan 93 13:21:50 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1993Jan5.181951.16427@cs.wisc.edu>, jeffr@ssec.wisc.edu (Jeff Ramin)
 writes:
>In article <43057@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>, kprashan@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (hyderabadi) writes
:
>|> In article <C0D1w2.6vC@acsu.buffalo.edu>, kist@acsu.buffalo.edu (james e kis
t) writes:
>|> > Did anybody see Chris Dishman's postgame interview? He refused to give
>|> > credit to the Bills and said that he couldn't say that the Bills did
>|> > anything spectacular in the game, but rather that the Oilers choked.
>|> > The greatest comeback in NFL history is not spectacular? yeah, right. Shin
e
>|> > up your golf clubs, Chris. You'll have the entire off-season to whine.
>|> > --Jim
>|>
>|>
>|> Dishman was right. The bottom line, the Oilers choked. The reporters asked
>|> him about what happened to the Oilers, and he responded. Now, Frank Reich ga
ve
>|> credit to Jesus for coming back and winning the game.. as if *He* really
>|> cared who won the game.
>
>I agree.  Give credit to the Bills for not giving up, but this game was much mo
re
>Houston's loss than it was Buffalo's win.  At this level of football, there's
>simply no excuse for blowing a 32 point lead.  Houston simply handed the game
>to the Bills.
>Before you Buffalo fans flame away, let me say that I'm neither a Houston nor
>Buffalo fan.  All just my opinion.
>
Yes, Houston handed it to the Bills, and the Bills joyously took what Houston
gave them.  They took advantage of every opportunity during their comeback.
Give credit to the BIlls for hanging in there and not giving up at the half.
It would have been easy for the team to just call it quits and not play hard
during the second half.  When Houston intercepted at the start of the 2nd
half, I thought the curtain was down for the Bills, but they just kept on
coming.  It seemed Houston played to hold onto their lead, the Bills played
like a loose underdog with nothing to lose.
-- 

------------------------
|   Gail A. Fullman    |
|   Manager - ADMO     |
|   Ext. 83113         |
------------------------
From: boell@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Donald P Boell)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 00:53:15 GMT
Subject: Re: Bills-Oilers
Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro

>Well, not quite. If the receiver is *pushed* out of bounds, he can come back
>and still remain an eligible receiver.

Buzzzzzzzzzzz.  Sorry.  It does not matter how the player went OB - once
OB the player may not catch a non-tipped forward pass.  Beebe's catch was
illegal.  Zebra blew it.  Not to mention the fact that the non-fumble just
prior that Houston recovered was a fumble (and thus the Beebe play should 
never have taken place).

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Subject: MOST OUTRAGEOUS MADDENISM YET
Originator: delarocq@c00515-118rd.eos.ncsu.edu
Keywords: madden, football
Reply-To: delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu (DERRELL EMERY LAROCQUE)
Organization: North Carolina State University, Project Eos
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 23:49:46 GMT




  THE BLIMP COMMENT

  It's a regular season game during the 1991 season, and the Goodyear
  blimp makes an appearance at the game. Well, the other announcer
  happens to comment about how the blimp is giving great shots of the
  game. Well, Madden in all his stupidity, boldly comments, "Ya know,
  instead of the guys who run that thing staying in the little part
  of the blimp, why don't they use ALL of that space above them? Put
  in a living room and other things". What a totally stupid comment!
  
  Everyone knows that's where the helium is! duh! stick to football! :)
-- 
delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu


      
---------------------------------------------------------------------------   
1988,1989,1990,1991 AFC East Division Champions
1991,1992 AFC Conference Champions

Squished the Fish .. Monday Night Football, November 16, 1992..

If you are a Buffalo Bills fan, email me at delarocq@eos.ncsu.edu
so we can talk all about the games, insight, etc.
If you are a Packers fan, let me know. I am interested in any news
out of Green Bay...
A PROUD MEMBER OF THE BILLS COALITION THAT TOOK THE BET II.
Xref: sparky rec.sport.football.pro:32227 misc.test:15134
From: dwelch@mpd.tandem.com (Dan Welch)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro,misc.test
Subject: Re: Cowboys KILL Eagles
Date: 12 Jan 93 18:49:37 GMT
Followup-To: rec.sport.football.pro
Organization: Tandem Computers (MPD) Austin, TX

In article <schnitzi.726847344@eola.cs.ucf.edu> schnitzi@cs.ucf.edu (Mark Schnitzius) writes:
>>Whatsa matter, Marky Mark, can't take a loss??  You were one
>>of the biggest Philly woofers around BEFORE the game(s)!  
>
>Prove it, or admit you are a liar.  I predicted the Cowboys would
>win (but was rooting for the Eagles all the way).

People, Mark has been the only (or maybe one of two) Eagle fan to come
out after the game and congratulate the Cowboys.  I think that takes some
chutzpah.  Lose with class, but win with class, too.

Daniel Welch
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: CCP17BK@AUDUCADM.DUC.AUBURN.EDU (Bill Kelly)
Subject: Re: steve walsh deal
Reply-To: kellywh@mail.auburn.edu
Organization: Auburn University, AL
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 14:01:00 GMT

In article <1993Jan4.193904.16603@micom.com>,
jscott@micom.com (James Scott) writes:

>
>in sort of a related issue ... do saint fans consider it a good trade?
>i mean, if walsh was really THAT good ... why isn't he playing?
>
>btw, i consider JJ to be one shrewd judge of talent and am just wondering
>if this trade was a total bust, or what?
>
>thanks, 
>
>james
>
As far as I'm concerned, that trade was one of the dumbest things
Jim Finks has done while with the Saints.  Don't get me wrong -
overall, I think Finks and Mora have worked miracles for us.  But
Walsh was (like Torretta is) another over-rated Miami quarterback,
Johnson knew it, and he took us to the cleaners.

Maybe next year, guys...
Bill
From: mcs77695@zach.fit.edu ( PALACIOS)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Dallas will win SB
Date: 12 Jan 93 17:28:47 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne USA

Top 10 Reasons Why Dallas will win SB

10. Dallas has #1 overall D
9.  San Fran has the 26th passing D
8.  Dallas had a tough regular season schedule.
7.  AFC has no chance
6.  Jimmy Johnson has a better haircut than George Seifert
5.  E Smith is at his peak
4.  Dallas has too much team speed
3.  E Smith is the real NFC MVP not Steve Young
2.  Michael Irvin is tougher than Rice O Roni
1.  Dallas D is pissed about pro bowl selections. 



Predictions

Dallas     30          
San Fran   10
 
Buffalo    24 
Miami      13


Super Bowl

Dallas     42
Buffalo    17
From: satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: why I think the Eagles lost
Date: 13 Jan 93 03:10:29 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Pennsylvania

In article <IK.93Jan12193531@puffin.ctt.bellcore.com> Ik Su Yoo <ik@mobydick.leis.bellcore.com> writes:
>
>BTW, thanks for the clarification on the catch.
>
>This is late in coming, but my 2 cents worth:
>
>I think the Eagles lost because they have acquired Walker. Yes, because
>they have Walker. Look what happened to Dallas, then Minnesota, while he
>was there. IMHO, the guy was never serious about playing football, and even
>once said that he wanted to join CIA or something like that. He was bad
>news for Dallas and I was sorry to see Dorsette eventually get traded to
>Denver. (I'm not sure whether there was a Walker-factor, though.)
>
>Go (the renewed) Dallas Cowboys!
>--
>
>Ik Su Yoo
>RRC-4F728, x5764
>ik@mobydick.leis.bellcore.com

Sorry, afraid I can't agree with you here.  What differentiates the Eagles
from the other two teams mentioned above is that Hershel Walker was not the
focus of their offense.  On Dallas, Hershel did it all mainly because they
were a team in transition... I'd account him for the few wins they had back
in those years rather than their losses.  In Minnesota, they pratically sold
the farm to get this guy so they tried to get him to do everything short of
kicking field goals.  He couldn't (he's not God, despite what he may tell
you :-)... hence his tag.  When Philly got him, they had nothing to lose...
Randall was always good for the ground game and they had Byars.  In fact,
they plugged in Heath Sherman and got a few great games from him... Herschel
wasn't all of Philly's running game.

One interesting note to all this... last year he was considered a bum and his
career all washed up.  This year his career is considered remarkably
rejuvinated... He's had the same average-yards-per-carry both years 3.9!!

satish nair

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: ron@osf.org (Ron Birnbaum)
Subject: Patriots Rumors (Re: Parsells to Patriots???)
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 20:20:05 GMT

In article <104329@netnews.upenn.edu>, satish@a.chem.upenn.edu (Satish Nair) writes:
|> In article <Adriene_Nazaretian.105.0@QM.cis.YALE.EDU> Adriene_Nazaretian@QM.cis.YALE.EDU (ALN - Go Giants!) writes:
|> >Subj. says it all....
|> >
|> >Anyone else catch wind of this.  It was in my local paper.
|> >It does make sense.  NE needs someone to "take the bull by the horns".  
|> >Parsells is the man to do it.  Its a good fit for a team to rebuild.
|> 
|> The latest ESPN rumour is that a group of investors including Bill Parcells
|> is interested in purchasing the franchise.  This group would then install
|> Bill as their head coach and... get this, Will McDonough (the guy from NFL
|> Live) as the general manager.  

  Yesterday on Boston's WEEI all-sports radio (590 am - also 1440 in Worcester)
  Will McDonough said this rumor is complete nonsense. He knows the people in
  that group and none ever talked to him about it. Besides, there is no
  way he would accept such a position - it would severely upset his current
  lifestyle of leisure. He enjoys his highpaying CBS job and also is Globe
  writings.
  What really upset Will is that ESPN called Will before announcing the
  rumor - and he told them what I've posted above - that there is no way
  he'd be intrested. But ESPN went on the air with the rumor anyway - never
  saying they talked to Will who denied the whole thing!! Maybe ESPN will
  change their anme to the ESPN Inquirer!

|> The Pats don't really need much rebuilding... their D is decent and their
|> O line has been rebuilding for the last few drafts (Pat Harlow, Eugene
|> Chung) and they'll probably end up with a franchise QB this year.  What they
|> need is someone who can get them to play up to their talent and either
|> Parcells or Ditka would fit the bill.

  HA!! If only I could believe that! Chung has not looked impressive and Harlow
  hasn't had an excellent game all year. Besides - have you forgotten that
  their best offensive lineman, Bruce Armstrong, may be out forever? He's
  gone at least all of '93/'94 season, and if he does make it back I doubt
  he'll be all-pro caliber again. They still also need a center. At TE and
  running back they are ok - even at QB they are decent - but they could
  use a franchise QB, of course. 

  As for the defense, Tippett is getting old, and they still didn't have any
  pass rush. They need a bunch of better secondary people, and a linebacker
  or two would be nice. They still are hurting from the loss of Gerin Veris.
  In short - they really need 4 or 5 new impact players on this defense!

-Ron Birnbaum
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: dggok@pbhyg.PacBell.COM (4E150M)
Subject: Re: Dallas, most playoff wins
Reply-To: dggok@PacBell.COM (David G. Gok)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:39:04 GMT

In article <1993Jan11.132419.626@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu> bsutesch@wsuhub.uc.twsu.edu writes:
>With the Dallas win over philly, Dallas holds
>the record for number of playoff wins (22).
>
>Yep, that's right.  Not S.F., not Washington,

If I counted right (using toes like any good computer scientist does)
and count ONLY playoffs since the beginning of the SuperBowl, the
49ers are 17-8.  Three losses to the Cowboys (71,72,73), three losses
to the Giants (85,86,90), one loss to the Redskins (83) and one loss
to the Vikings (87).

I guess the 49ers still owe Dallas a couple :-)

>not the Raiders.
>
>Brian
>Go Cowboys
>Go Baylor
From: rsk@gynko.circ.upenn.edu (Rich Kulawiec)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dan Reeves wants to go to Chicagao.
Date: 6 Jan 93 00:37:45 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Go Big or Go Home

In article <1ictqtINNett@crcnis1.unl.edu> shiva@cse.unl.edu (V. Sivaramakrishnan) writes:
>Dan Reeves' comments on Ditka's firing:
>" It is a shame if this news is indeed true.
>  But I would be interested in the job !!!".

Please, no.  The Bears have been, if nothing else, extraordinarily
entertaining for much of the last decade.  But the departure of
McMahon...and Gault...and Marshall...and Hilgenberg...and Fencik...
and Singletary...and Payton...and Suhey...and McKinnon...and Wilson...
and now Ditka...  have all contributed to an gradual homogenizing
of the team.  Having Reeves as the head honcho would just make it worse;
he's the coaching equivalent of plain cardboard.

---Rsk
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (JOHN)
Subject: Re: Jim Kelly?
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 16:11:05 GMT

In article <1993Jan8.172233.26204@state.systems.sa.gov.au> gcsbagc@state.systems.sa.gov.au writes:
>Can anyone tell me whether Jim Kelly will play again this year?  We don't get a lot
>of NFL coverage in this part of the world.  Thanks. 

>
Since Kelly is not scheduled to start AND they will LOSE,
NO. He will play THIS year though, but NEXT football season. :-)
-- 
 ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@pacbell.com	--------	
"To be absolutely certain about something, one must know
everything or nothing about it."   Olin Miller
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: tech@cs.ucf.edu (Tony Travaglini)
Subject: Re: Ditka in Denver
Organization: University of Central Florida, Orlando
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 17:25:15 GMT

In article <1id361INNn3p@male.EBay.Sun.COM> zombie@EBay.Sun.COM writes:
>In article Gox@hpuerca.atl.hp.com,  krb@hpuerca.atl.hp.com (Kevin Barnes) writes:
>>
>>Elway and big Mike! God that would be interestion
>
>"interestion"?  What's that?

It's short for "interesting situation". Sort of like "fucou". 

Tony (go san diego) Travaglini
tech@cs.ucf.edu
From: andres@minerva.ece.drexel.edu (Andres Lebaudy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Dallas on Real Grass
Date: 12 Jan 93 21:23:08 GMT
Organization: Drexel University, Philadelphia PA

>>10-25 at Raiders    1-0
>>11-22 at Phoenix    2-0
>>12-6  at Denver     3-0
>>12-13 at Washington 3-1
>>
>You forgot the loss at Philadelphia, which makes them 3-2.  'Course, they
>
>Daniel Welch
>----
Veteran Stadium has artificial turf.

Andres
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: stailey@bugs.comm.mot.com (Mike Stailey)
Subject: Re: Landry to the Bears?
Reply-To: stailey@comm.mot.com
Organization: Motorola LMPS Research, Schaumburg, IL
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 09:03:51 GMT

(Gary Beason) writes:

*I just heard on WGN news that the Bears are considering asking to
*interview Landry for the coaching position.

*Imagine my thoughts, my being a Cowboy fan.
*But, is that Tom or Greg Landry?

 They were talking about Greg Landry, the current offensive
 coordinator for the Bears. But don't hold your breath...
 current thinking says McCaskey will go outside the organization
 for a new coach. And the leading candidate seems to be...

 Richie Pettibone - former Bear/current def coord for Washington

 That would mean Vince Tobin is out! (Yeah!)

 --
 Michael                      
 stailey@comm.mot.com
From: nate@ghidrah.Central.Sun.COM (Nate McConnell FE/SSE Grand Rapids, MI)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Team of Frustrations: Cleveland Browns
Date: 11 Jan 1993 16:46:11 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: nate@ghidrah.Central.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: ghidrah.central.sun.com

In article 3EE@cs.psu.edu, nousek@astro.psu.edu (John A. Nousek) writes:
>While the Browns had a lot of success in the pre-Super Bowl days,
>they have the unquestioned lead in one area of frustration.  They
>are 0-6 in the game before the Super Bowl.  While most people
>remember the three notable losses to Denver of the recent past,
>and a few commented on the losses to Minnesota and Baltimore in
>the old NFL title games, no one seems to remember that Cleveland
>lost the title game to Green Bay, just before the first Super Bowl.
>That was Jim Brown's last game, and one of the crucial plays was
>a Frank Ryan potential TD pass that bounced off his hands on a
>cold and muddy day in Green Bay.
>
>I am pretty sure no other team has lost as many as six of the
>games before the Super Bowl, and certainly no other team is 0-6
>at that level of competition.
>
>	John Nousek


Along with all the above facts the Browns have the best all time record
of the teams that have never made a super bowl.

nate
From: skywalke@dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu (Timothy B. Reynolds)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Eagles Victory...
Date: 4 Jan 1993 19:23:03 GMT
Organization: X-Ray Crystallography / Atomic Biophysics H.H.M.I.
Distribution: usa
NNTP-Posting-Host: dino.qci.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu

In article <103647@netnews.upenn.edu> sajja@gradient.cis.upenn.edu (Rajeev  Sajja) writes:

[Egale droppings deleted]
 >Emmitt smith is going down and going down hard!! 

Im sure you would like for this to happen, dream on. 
Thats what they all say right before he rushes for his usual 150 yds.
and three TD's.

 >If you guys were not praying for a saints victory on sunday, then you need
 >to refresh your memory with what happenned in the past..

I was praying for the eagles to win, did someone tell you Dallas was scared
of the eagles or something ??? The past ? what like 18 Div titles, 5 trips
to the big game and two SB trophies. 

 >Does last year's 24-0 remind you of anything. And the venue was texas stadium
 >11 sacks, I can live with that. well,  

Ya reminds me of last year, hello ?? but my how times have changed, 
Ooooo, did someone take your number 1 defensive title, sure looks that
way from here. 

> all said and done it is going to be
>a closely fought game.

Agreed

 >My heart says... 

>	Philadelphia:	24
>	Dallas:		20
>

So listen to your head not your heart....

Dallas 24
Eagles 14

 DALLAS COWBOYS
 NFC EAST CHAMPIONS
 RESTED AND READY !!!!
 tim

>hey, vintage 1990 randall is back...
(for one game)
>GO EAGLES....