HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
X-Delivery-Notice:  SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 13:50:32 CST
Reply-To:     Phil Wood <wood@PSYSPARC.PSYC.MISSOURI.EDU>
From:         Phil Wood <wood@PSYSPARC.PSYC.MISSOURI.EDU>
Subject:      Short Question regarding Multiple Group Analyses in Calis

SAS System: 6.07.02 running under Unix on a Sun SparcStation
Query: Am I right in thinking this is how to do multiple groups in Calis?

For reasons which are a bit long in the tooth, I'm in the position of
trying to do a multiple group analysis with three groups and to
test a longitudinal factor model. I need to employ a nonlinear
constraint in this analysis, so using EQS and Lisrel isn't appropo here.
After rereading the theory of multi-group analysis, I came up with the
following & would like the group's sense of my approach to the problem:

Since I have three variance/covariance matrices, I was going to create a
block diagonal matrix with zeros elsewhere for the three groups, and then
specify 3*F factors where F is the number of factors in the solution.
I would then constraint the relevant parts of the SEM to be the same
across the groups. I can then let relevant parameters (such as error
variances) be unique across groups.

My question is this: Is this a correct way to get the path values
for a multi-group analysis. I know the following: (1) Since I added the
zeros in my Kronecker-productized input matrix, I'll need to
multiply the fit function by the appropriate value to get a
Chi Square. (2) Since I have different sample sizes for each
group, I'll need to recompute the standard errors by hand (or by
rerunning the models in Calis several times specifying a different
error DF for the appropriate group.

This is, at least, the way I see it. Apart from the matrix algebra,
I'm a little hazy on the calculus of Kronecker products & sums (although
I'm re-reading Everitt's fine book on the topic). I thought I would ask
the group if this was appropriate in the interim, lest millions of
electrons die needlessly this afternoon in my enthusiasm to at least
play around with the program before rechecking everything.

Thanks for any replies &/or flames
Phil Wood
Univ. of Mo-Columbia
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 14:35:43 PST
Reply-To:     "P. Oldenkamp 5-4481" <oldenkmp@ESPRESSO.BOEING.COM>
From:         "P. Oldenkamp 5-4481" <oldenkmp@ESPRESSO.BOEING.COM>
Subject:      Re: SAS on Sun
Comments: To: SAS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu, schild%alishaw@HUB.UCSB.EDU

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTENT:  COMMENT AND QUESTION
REL/PLTF: 6.07.02/SunOS
E-ADDR:   oldenkmp@ESPRESSO.boeing.com
NAME:     Paul OldenKamp
PHONE:    206-865-4481
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Schildhauer asked:

>    Sun just released specs on a bunch of new models,
> which will ONLY run Solaris 2.1--the full SVR4 version.
>
> Does this mean that these workstations WON'T be able
> to run the current Sun4 SAS binaries? YOW!!  Does this
> mean SAS is going to 'deprecate' the old SunOS binaries
> and shift to Solaris?  OYYY!

As I understand it Solaris has something called 'binary compatibility mode'
that will allow one to run SunOS 4.x programs.  The question we need to
get answered is how well SAS 6.07 and SAS 6.09 run in this mode.  Does
anyone know whether or when a Solaris version of 6.09 is scheduled for
release?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
               //  Paul OldenKamp
              //   BCS Research and Technology          .
             //    P. O. Box 24346, MS 7L-21            |\
            //     Seattle, WA   98124-0346             | \____oo_
           //==========================================((__|  /___>
          //       ___ ___ ___ ___     __                  | //
         //       /__//  //__  /  /\ //  _                 |//
        //       /__//__//__ _/_ /  //__/                  ''
       //
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 09:19:31 -0500
Reply-To:     "Paul A. Thompson" <pat@po.CWRU.Edu>
From:         "Paul A. Thompson" <pat@PO.CWRU.EDU>
Subject:      SAS and S+
Comments: To: sas-l@vtvm2.cc.vt.edu

I have recently gotten an evaluation copy of S+ from StatSci.  For those
of you who have SAS and S+, ...
   - do you use S+ much?
   - would you recommend its purchase to complement SAS?
   - how has support been?
   - are there major bugs which are a problem?
   - what is the most useful additional feature of S+ which adds to SAS?
Please reply by answering whichever of these questions you wish to me
personally.  I will summarize for the list later.

--
Paul Thompson, Ph.D.  |  Department of Psychiatry  |  (216) 844-7463
Case Western Reserve University  | Cleveland, OH  44106
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When I hear "family values," I reach for my revolver. - para. Hans Jonst
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 17:09:53 EST
Reply-To:     "Nelson R. Pardee" <SASMAINT@SUVM.BITNET>
From:         "Nelson R. Pardee" <SASMAINT@SUVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Win SAS Developer's Release

Size:
 Base 5.3       Assist 6.3      Connect  .8
 Lab  5         ETS    7.2      CALC    4.1
 OR   9         FSP    1        Insight 2.5
 IML  3         QC     11.5     ACCESS   .7
 Graph 16       Maps   7
Total=80 megabytes for these products; CORE & other system stuff is additional.
Total space allocated to the SAS directory is 109M.

The installation instructions say you need 40 meg minimum. A SAS techie
said 21M is the absolute minimum.

Don't run any other programs while installing, i.e., don't try to
print a little W4W document.
Don't try to install in a directory with a name <xxxxx.yyy>. Just
use an 8 character directory name.
More later, I hope....
 --Nelson R. Pardee,  Computing Services, Syracuse University          --
 --120 Hinds Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244-1190 USA   (315)443-1079         --
 --Bitnet: SASMAINT@SUVM     Internet: SASMAINT@SUVM.ACS.SYR.EDU       --
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 09:48:00 EST
Reply-To:     "Philip Gallagher,(919)966-1065" <UPHILG@UNC.BITNET>
From:         "Philip Gallagher,(919)966-1065" <UPHILG@UNC.BITNET>
Subject:      Kludge soln. for PROC REPORT formatting problem

Harry Sharp wrote with a problem about getting PROC REPORT to order
the character values Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior in
precisely that customary order.  Here is my ugly submission:


    Harry, this is in a dreaful hurry, so forgive me, but
    I bet it will work.  Try formatting the names as

    '   Freshman'
    '  Sophomore'
    ' Junior'
    'Senior'

    The leading blanks will sort before letters, of course,
    and you should get the ordering you desire.  (I hope.)
    Now, having illustrated the principle, with your particular
    spellings, you can get away with

    ' Freshman'
    ' Sophomore'
    'Junior'
    'Senior'

    because blank-F will sort before blank-S, and
            blank-S will sort before J, and
            J will sort before S(enior).

    It's ugly, but it should work, in a hurry.

                                      Phil Gallagher
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 10:34:43 CST
Reply-To:     Chris Barnes <CBARNES@TAMVM1.BITNET>
From:         Chris Barnes <CBARNES@TAMVM1.BITNET>
Subject:      informat question

In sas 6.07, is there an informat to have SAS properly read numbers
written in an 'accounting' format (ie.   negitive numbers have
CR following the number)?

ex
6.0987
123.0876
8765.987CR    /*  this is the negative number  */
87.908

      -----------------------------------------------------
Chris Barnes            |   Duck hunting is not a matter of
cbarnes@tamvm1.tamu.edu |   of life and death.  It's much
(409) 846-3273 (home)   |   more important than that!
(409) 845-4437 (work)   |
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Apparently-To: <sas-l%ohstvma.bitnet@uunet.uu.net>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 22:25:29 EST
Reply-To:     William Kahn <71020.1025@COMPUSERVE.COM>
From:         William Kahn <71020.1025@COMPUSERVE.COM>
Subject:      experimental markets

I'm cross listing this.

I have just read the December 1992 _Scientific American_ article by
V.L. Smith and A.W. Williams "Experimental Market Economics."  I want to
set up an "election market" along the lines of the sidebar on page 120.
Could someone on this list e-mail me a reference on where I can read
about the details of how this was done?  There must be e-mail directions
because the market was conducted via e-mail.

SAS-L is a slightly peculiar place to ask about this, but I have found there
is an unusually talented and eclectic community which tracks this list.

Thank you very much for any help you can give me here.


Bill Kahn
W. L. Gore and Associates
71020.1025@compuserve.com
wkahn@mcimail.com
(410) 398-6400
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 10:44:30 EDT
Reply-To:     MSZ03@ALBNYDH2.BITNET
Comments:     Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
From:         MSZ03@ALBNYDH2.BITNET
Subject:      SAS-TO-PAGEMAKER

Encapsulated postscript should work (I've done it with SAS-to-Word Perfect).
All you will see is a box (same as in WP) since there's no display image
created in the EPS file - it only contains the commands to drive a PS
printer.  Have you tried printing the document with the 'gray-box?'  It
should print though all you see on the screen is a box.  Some programs
(e.g., on MACs) include a display image as part of the EPS file - not SAS.

Also, Pagemaker should also accept a CGM file that you can produce with SAS -
in that case yo can see the image on the screen

Mike Zdeb                   New York State Department of Health
Concourse (C-144)                                MSZ03@ALBNYDH2
Albany, NY   12237-0044                           (518)474-2377
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1992 13:57:37 EST
Reply-To:     Tim Dorcey <TCD@CORNELLC.BITNET>
From:         Tim Dorcey <TCD@CORNELLC.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Mean Comparisons

PROC DUNCAN, in the Version 5 SUGI Supplemental Library, can be used
to perform various mean comparison procedures (including Scheffe's) if
you have means, n's, an MSE value and its degrees of freedom.  In your
case, you will need to compute the appropriate MSE by pooling your
standard deviations.  If you don't have access to version 5 of SAS, then
I believe the ONEWAY procedure in SPSS will also do it.  With the demise
of the SUGI library I seem to recall seeing something that said "PROC
DUNCAN functionality would be included in version 6 GLM," but it seems
to me that SAS I. has only carried forward the dysfunctional part.  I.e.,
Duncan's comparison procedure is available in version 6 GLM, but it was
the ability to read in any set of means and an MSE that made PROC DUNCAN
useful!  This is valuable not just for the situation where you have only
summary data, but e.g., if you want to do multiple comparisons across
only a subset of the available means or while holding another factor
fixed at a certain value (as in "simple main effects") or when the
proper error term is a weighted combination of terms in the model.
Or, did I miss something?  Is there a way to solve this kind of problem
with version 6  (aside from faking up some data for GLM)?

Tim Dorcey                        BITNET:   TCD@CORNELLC
Statistical Software Consultant   Internet: TCD@CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL.EDU
Cornell Information Technologies  Phone:    (607) 255-5715
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY  14853
From: H85@psuvm.psu.edu (Haleh)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Subject: Mean Comparisons
Date: 18 Nov 92 21:41:15 GMT
Organization: Penn State University

Hi everyone. We have means, SD, and N for 5 groups (no raw data)
for a large number of variables. We would like to compare the means
across groups (Sheffe). Is there any way to use these means
as an input in SAS and run the analyses. Thanks very much for
your advise. I am trying to avoid doing this manually.
HALEH
From: flasar@WUGCRC.WUSTL.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Subject: help on SAS to EXCEL
Date: 17 Nov 92 21:03:48 GMT
Reply-To: flasar@WUGCRC.WUSTL.EDU
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Comments: To: sas-l@uga.bitnet@WUGATE.wustl.edu
Comments: cc: FLASAR@wugate.wustl.edu

Greetings,
   I'm having problems moving an ASCII data file from SAS to EXCEL.  Since
this is more a problem w/ EXCEL than SAS, does anyone know of a LIST for
EXCEL or spreadsheets?
   Thanks,
     Dan Flasar
     General Clinical Research Center
     Washington U School of Medicine
     St. Louis, MO
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Posted-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 92 15:23:36 EST
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:23:36 EST
Reply-To:     Paul Marsh <marsh@STAT.NCSU.EDU>
From:         Paul Marsh <marsh@STAT.NCSU.EDU>
Subject:      re: SAS-to-Pagemaker
Comments: To: sas-l@vtvm2.cc.vt.edu

sorry that I missed the original query, but there have been several replies re:
 how to move SAS/Graph output to Pagemaker.  all of the answers seemed correct.

one salient point to emphasize: it depends on the graphics filters that were
 loaded when Pagemaker was installed.  you must specify your needs at
 installation time (ie, you must look into the future).  there are filters for
 TIFF, PCX, HPGL, Encapsulated PostScript, and other graphic file formats. SAS
 supports many of these formats.  my preference is HPGL since it is a vector
 style format.  it is superior to Encapsulated PostScript in that you can see
 your graph on Pagemaker page. the following SAS segment is a possible setuP:

GOPTIONS DEV=HP7475a GSFMODE=replace  GSFNAME=GRAFOUT;
FILENAME GRAFOUT "catch-it-here name";

PROC Gsomething or other;


Then you can File-Place  "catch-it-here" into the Pagemaker doco.
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 07:03:44 -0500
Reply-To:     "From Jerry, Ext. 3226" <kaganj1%phvax.dnet@SMITHKLINE.COM>
From:         "From Jerry, Ext. 3226" <kaganj1%phvax.dnet@SMITHKLINE.COM>
Subject:      RE: Annoying PROC REPORT Behavior
Comments: To: sas-l@ohstvma.acs.ohio-state.edu%inet.dnet@smithkline.com
Comments: cc: KAGANJ1@smithkline.com.local

First let me say that I am not familure enough with proc report to say
absolutely that there is not a simple solution to your sorting problem.
But,
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 09:02:00 EST
Reply-To:     Sally Muller <UNCSM1@UNC.BITNET>
From:         Sally Muller <UNCSM1@UNC.BITNET>
Subject:      SAS for Windows NT and SAS OS/2 6.08 Developers Edition

SUMMARY:  Info re SAS for Windows NT and SAS 6.08 for OS/2 2.0.
E-ADDR:   uncsm1@unc.bitnet
NAME:     Sally Muller
PH/ADDR:  919-962-6501  OIT CB#3455, UNC, Chapel Hill NC 27514
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Tom Skinner said:
> (INSIDER NEWS:  SCUTTLEBUT HAS IT THAT CERTAIN SOFTWARE COMPANIES
> BE DEMO-ING on NT on an Intel PENTIUM MICROPROCESSOR BASED
> PLATFORM at the MS Booth at FALL COMDEX NEXT WEEK)

Source at SI confirmed this.

 J. Philip Miller said:
>
> SI has indicated that it will support Windows NT on the Intel
> platform (I don't recall any statement that they would support it
> on DEC's Alpha to answer an earlier private question).

Jerry Tangren agreed:
>
> As of June 25, 1992, Tim Lehman was saying that SI was
> developing SAS for Windows NT on Intel platforms only.

Source said this is definitely correct that SAS/NT *currently* is
for Intel only.  They threw in some bonus info -- the current
plan at SI is to get SAS for Windows NT out the door
ASAP...."we're really impressed how good it looks...." (and this
is a person who was previously skeptical).  Since BETA Windows NT
is available the FIRST developers edition (i.e. beta) of SAS for
Windows NT will run on that and they **think** that will be out
1Q93.....but won't swear to it....

One last bit of news (and this was from Dave Brumitt, SI tech
support manager for PCs and workstations)  the Developer's version
of SAS 6.08 for OS/2 2.0 is ready to ship out the door -- 1 to 2
weeks max!!!!!!
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.2 PL16]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Sun, 15 Nov 1992 10:12:06 CST
Reply-To:     "R. Snyder" <rsnyder@LOBBY.TI.COM>
From:         "R. Snyder" <rsnyder@LOBBY.TI.COM>
Subject:      Re: Postscript to a TI Micro Laser
Comments: To: NJMS%NCSUMVS.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu
Comments: cc: sas-l@uga.cc.uga.edu
              "NJMS%NCSUMVS.BITNET@ncsuvm.cc.ncsu.edu" at Nov 13, 92 5:17 pm

SUBJECT:   Postscript to a TI Micro Laser
SUMMARY:   Will not accept EPS from SAS
E-ADDR:    rsnyder@lobby.ti.com
NAME:      Bob Snyder
COMPANY:   Texas Instruments, Sherman, TX
PHONE:     (903) 868-5799
FAX:       (903) 868-7240
>
>    What a pain!  You are right, I have no problem directly from UNIX.
>  However, the MVS ps300 device driver creates a totally different
>  file that does not print. Any other suggestions?
>
Joy,

The only other result of my experiences that I can share is that the Micro
Laser will NOT accept an Encapsulated Post Script file from SAS. The first
line of an EPS file usually says something about "Adobe 2.0" or some such.
Because of this, I've made sure to use device drivers and not EPS drivers.

Maybe your 6.06 driver will solve the problem.

Good luck,
Bob
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1992 10:50:00 EST
Reply-To:     Tom Lewis <THL@NCCIBM1.BITNET>
From:         Tom Lewis <THL@NCCIBM1.BITNET>
Subject:      db search

//
Database Search DD=Rules
//Rules DD  *
Search latitude in sas-l
Index
/*
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Mailer: Elm [revision: 66.36.1.1]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Wed, 18 Nov 1992 08:15:50 EST
Reply-To:     Ronald Cody EdD <cody@UMDNJ.EDU>
From:         Ronald Cody EdD <cody@UMDNJ.EDU>
Subject:      Reply to STAT/SAS question
Comments: To: Members of SAS-L <sas-l@uga.cc.uga.edu>

Matt Larson writes:
>
> My wife doesn't have access to SAS-L and she has a question if any of you can
> help..
>
> She has analysis of a life events scale with 20 yes/no questions. She needs to
> do a point by serial correlation with total sum. She also needs to do a
> Kuter-Richardson 20 which is similar to an alpha but is appropiate for yes/no
> data. Thanks any help would be appreciated.
> The end.
>
The answer to the first part is to create a variable which is the sum of
the 20 items   (TOTAL = SUM (OF Q1-Q20);) or other appropriate code if
there are missing values.  Next, just compute a Pearson correlation
between each of the 20 items and the sum--it is equivalent to a point
biserial coefficient whcn one of the variables is dichotomous.

PROC CORR;
   VAR Q1-Q20;
   WITH TOTAL;
RUN;

To answer your second question re KR-20 (thats Kuder Richardson), this
is equivalent to coefficient alpha when the items are dichotomous.  The
KR-20 formula is a simplification of the more generalized coefficient
alpha.  Use PROC CORR ALPHA;  VAR Q1-Q20;

If you wish, I have SAS code to compute KR-20 directly.  I wrote this
before SAS introducted the ALPHA option in PROC CORR.  Please drop me an
e-mail message if you would also like this code.

Hope this helps.

Ron Cody

--
 -----------------------------------------------------
|  Ronald Cody, Ed.D.                                 |
|  Robert Wood Johnson Medical School                 |
|  Department of Environmental and Community Medicine |
|  675 Hoes Lane                                      |
|  Piscataway, NJ 08854                               |
|  -------------------------------------------------- |
|  Voice Phone (908)463-4490                          |
|  Fax         (908)463-4569                          |
|  E-Mail      CODY@RWJA.UMDNJ.EDU                    |
 -----------------------------------------------------
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Mon, 23 Nov 1992 11:11:21 EST
Reply-To:     Jozsef Vitrai <VITRAI@NKI.BITNET>
From:         Jozsef Vitrai <VITRAI@NKI.BITNET>
Subject:      problem with X{i}+1 type expressions

Hi,
I ran into a possible error using the short form of an assignment with array.
Has anybody noticed this type of problem? Please have a look at it and tell me
what could be the cause behind it.
The problem is a very simple data step: counting occurances arrenged in arry.
The results of the use of the short and then the complet form of assignment is
located at right side of the program.

****************************** SHORT ******************************************
data d1;                                           The SAS System
do i=1 to 5; output;end;                                  10:20 Monday

data d2; set d1;                            OBS    I    X1    X2    X3
array Xs {3} x1-x3;
if i ne 3                                    1     1     1     1     1
 then do;                                    2     2     2     2     2
   do j=1 to 3; Xs{j}=0; end;            ==> 3     3     2     2     2 <==
   do j=1 to 3; Xs{j}+i; end;                4     4     4     4     4
      end;                                   5     5     5     5     5
drop j;
proc print; run;
******************************** COMPLET **************************************
data d3; set d1;                                   The SAS System
array Xs {3} x1-x3;                                       10:20 Monday
if i ne 3
 then do;                                   OBS    I    X1    X2    X3
   do j=1 to 3; Xs{j}=0; end;
   do j=1 to 3; Xs{j}=Xs{j}+i; end;          1     1     1     1     1
      end;                                   2     2     2     2     2
drop j;                                  ==> 3     3     .     .     . <==
proc print; run;                             4     4     4     4     4
                                             5     5     5     5     5

*******************************************************************************
Thanks for your attention.
Jozsef
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 10:44:38 EST
Reply-To:     Ekeho <V1354G@TEMPLEVM.BITNET>
From:         Ekeho <V1354G@TEMPLEVM.BITNET>
Subject:      Macro bug in SAS 6.06

Hi;
Yesterday I asked help to resolve macro ploblem.
When I run the following one under IBM/CMS SAS 6.06.
SAS creates "CMSFILEDEF ...", but under SAS 6.07 it does
"CMS FILEDEF ...". I include it below.
=============================================
options macrogen mprint mlogic symbolgen;

%macro cmsfile(name);
  %do i=1 %to 9;
      cms filedef &name&i disk &name&i prn a;
  %end;
%mend cmsfile;
%cmsfile(d)
run;

===============================================================

Ekeho Oh

Internet: V1354G@VM.TEMPLE.EDU     Home: 223 W. Mentor St.
Bitnet:   V1354G@TEMPLEVM                Philadelhpia, PA 19120
Dep't of Statistics                      215-329-6345
Temple University
Philadelphia, PA 19122
USA

===============================================================
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Encoding: 9 TEXT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 (beta-2)
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 19 Nov 1992 08:31:00 EST
Reply-To:     SMC4@NCH02A.EM.CDC.GOV
From:         SMC4@NCH02A.EM.CDC.GOV
Subject:      Annoying PROC REPORT Behavior
Comments: To: SAS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu

This may be a silly suggestion, but have you considered using alternative
names for your classes - e.g., Class 1, Class 2, etc.? I realize that this
may sound strange, but if that feature is something which can't be altered,
then perhaps the names CAN (depends on how hard you want to avoid custom
work, I suppose).

SMC4
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU