HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (S Hopkins)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Out of the closet (was Re: Dictionary of American and British Usage)
Date: 15 Apr 92 05:02:28 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

>I'm afraid there's very little alt.usage.english relevance to this
>post.  I left a.u.e. in the Newsgroups line because of the reference
>to "tearoom" sex.

I'm taking it out again now as I don't intend to discuss the usage here.

I said:

>>No, it's called *cottaging*, dunno why ... but I know folk that do this,
>>bifolk at that and watch out with the "repressed" bit as these folk
>>*aren't* repressed.

>Watch out with the overgeneralizations there, though, for while many
>of the people who engage in this sort of "tearoom" or "t-room"
>activity (as it's called on this side of the pond -- perhaps we can
>find a 'Murrican word queen to etymologize that for us) are not
>repressed queers, many of them ARE.  There are scads and scads of
>people who meet anonymously for same-sex encounters in bathrooms,
>parks, rest stops, truck stops, and so on and would never in a million
>years consider themselves "faggots" because of it.

You're right of course Tim, and I apologise for not making myself clear,
however I meant that the people who *I* know who "cottage"/whatever
aren't repressed as opposed to the folk Graham was talking about; I was
making the point that there is another side to that coin.

>(The use of the male term in that last sentence ... "cruising" like
>this is considered to be done almost universally by men.  I have no
>idea if women have similar cruising areas.)

I have never heard of equivalents for women.  Anyone out there has?

Sara
-- 
 >{8-)  Sara Hopkins  (-8}<                      ______             ^
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St.   \  / / Glorious OOO
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662   \/\/   Stereo  ++  
 >  sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk  < < Six of one, half a dozen of the other >
From: rivk@quads.uchicago.edu (nora gayle rivkis)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: too perverse? (was Re: I am Muffin! I am INVINCIBLE!)
Date: 7 Apr 92 23:49:18 GMT
Reply-To: rivk@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <KMJ1.92Apr6235614@PL118f.cc.lehigh.edu> kmj1@PL118f.cc.lehigh.edu (kate marie) writes:

>long hair? i loooove long hair...my SO's hair (hi lewis!) is halfway down 
>his back by now...and one of by best friends (unfortunately straight) has
>RED hair to her waist. mmmm...
>
>wow, i finally got the courage to demuffin. hugs/kisses/licks, anyone?

All you want, darlin'! My hair's brown, but it's just passed halfway
down my back... (anyone wish to follow it? ;->)

>kate

	-Nora


-- 
Oseh shalom b'imromav, hu ya'aseh shalom aleinu v'al kol yisrael.
From: gtoal@castle.ed.ac.uk (Graham Toal)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Bi Quotes and Red Heads
Date: 12 Apr 92 04:53:06 GMT
Organization: Edinburgh University

In article <1992Apr11.171711.29850@u.washington.edu> rhiann@milton.u.washington.edu (Sandra Hereld) writes:
>Graham, Joe, big hugs to you both.  Since I've been dating (for almost 
>*two* years) a motss most recently, I occaisonally feel the lack of male
>hugs (and sex, but that's another story...) in my life.

Was that an invitation to the Seattle orgy? ;-)  I know this lovely
*quiet* spot on Lummi Island just the dab for skinny dipping...

Big *hugs* back atcha

Graham
From: rhialto@falu.sneakernet (Olaf Seibert)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re:  Dominos (was: De-muffining, me too!)
Date: 8 Apr 92 16:20:44 GMT
Organization: Intravenous News Addicts

In article <1992Mar27.173650.9348@midway.uchicago.edu> pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?)) writes:
>peg,
>-packing her suitcase with bathing suit and shorts, so as to be
>ready to leave at a moment's notice *whenever* duty calls...

Who needs a bathing suit?
--
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert      B4f+-t-w--g+k+(+)svmrp+  rhialto@cs.kun.nl
\X/ How can you be so stupid if you're identical to me? -Robert Silverberg
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: sfjr@wam.umd.edu (Steve Russell)
Subject: Re: Women are BLG, too! (was: Outing at the Oscars?)
Summary: This is Sherri, no Steve.
Organization: University of Maryland at College Park
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1992 21:06:57 GMT

In article <iw.702668544@tosser> iw@tosser.Rational.COM (Iseult White) writes:
>gere@umunhum.stanford.edu (Susan Gere) writes:
>
>>- Do women who are victims of incest/sexual abuse shift nn points 
>>  on the Kinsey scale in response?  (my limited knowledge says yes.
>
>My limited knowledge would probably say yes too.  But I have always shied
>away from it, because it sounds like too easy a way to 
>explain (for those people who have a need to) why women are sometimes attracted
>to women instead of men.
>
>Has anyone ever seen studies that suggest that a higher percentage of BL women
>have been sexually abused?
>
>Iseult.

Glad you made the qualification about it being too easy an 'explanation', i.e.
we just like women because we hate men due to our abuse history.  A heterosexual
woman friend (who was abused by a man) and I (who was abused by a woman...yet
I thought it was a man at the time--long story) had a good laugh over these
ideas once.  I think it has to be remembered in interpreting studies, if there
are any, that more of the women in the gay/lesbian sample will have done a
great deal of thinking about their sexuality and therefore may be more likely
to have already remembered their abuse.

At any rate, I tend to doubt that there is any effect, i.e., I don't think abuse
'causes' homosexuality.  However, remembering abuse may also trigger a deeper
analysis of what one really wants sexually, which may help a person come out.

Sherri

p.s. You didn't mention men who have been sexually abused.  I'm curious as to
why.
From: nmw1638@cs.rit.edu (Nicolas M Williams)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: A Question- "Muffin"? "De-muffining"?
Date: 9 Apr 92 14:53:02 GMT
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY

In article <+93tjsh@rpi.edu> monitn@jec316.its.rpi.edu (Nicholas Monitto) writes:
>
>  Hi folks! Just wondering... I've sat here reading the posts for a while, 
>and one thing has been eluding me. What exactly is a "muffin"? And what is 
>"de-muffining"? Just wondering... :)

Muffin seems to mean someone who reads but doesn't post. When you post for
the first time you can be said to be demuffining. (Can we assume this is
your first post? If so, then I invite you to come in and have a good
time on soc.bi, WELCOME Nick (so now there's two of us here, we might
have to figure out a way to differentiate ourselves).
<coy look> *smooch*

>  Nick, the Self-Radiating TeddyBear (tm)
>  (monitn@rpi.edu)

Nick (Williams)
--
                                                           ______         
E-mail: nmw1638@cs.rit.edu Phone: (716) 475-3716           \ \/ /       
Mail: CPU 645, 25 Andrews Memorial Dr, Rochester, NY 14623  \/\/
Disclaimer: My opinions are mine!
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: pwiebe@ecst.csuchico.edu (stephanie mandell)
Subject: Re: e-flirts
Organization: California State University, Chico
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 18:23:34 GMT

In article <1992Apr14.095244.19345@thelema.uucp> STella@thelema.uucp (STella) writes:
>>>>>>>>>Flirtitiously munching on the back of the entire newsgroup's neck:
>>>>>>>>Flirtatiously nibbling the *big toes* of the entire newsgroup...
>>>>>>>Sensually massaging the lower back of the entire newsgroup...
>>>>>>Flirtatiously spinning my favorite whip at the entire newsgroup....
>>>>>Oooh yes, yes - but lash me gently, Stella ...
>>>>>Flirtatiously playing Bzzzttt with the whole newsgroup ...
>>>>Flirtatiously blowing bubbles over the whole scene...
>>>Sensually running my fingers over the newsgroup's most erogenous zones ;-)...
>>Is this turning into a cascade?
>Cascading handsful of frozen chains so they pool on your bodies.
Did someone ask for some Nutella?
From: tcg8@aber.ac.uk (Telsa Christina Gwynne)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: good places to not fit in
Date: 16 Apr 92 11:04:13 GMT
Organization: University of Wales, Aberystwyth

In article <9404@baird.cs.strath.ac.uk> sean@cs.strath.ac.uk (Sean Ahern) 
writes:

>>Well, have you got eight years worth of hair growth and are you a
>>computer hippy??
>
>  3 years, and yes.  More of a computer mutoid biclogothippy from hell,
>but no need to get fussy...

Hmmm..that's not what you told *me* you looked like. And you missed
out the black...and wot's biclogothippy? bi(ker?), goth, hippy - but
what was the bit in the middle?

>  Telsa!  Tell Her to stop playing with my mind, and also to hurry up
>with them four cans of beer as well....

Um - I'm afraid I think She giggled :-) 

	Telsa
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (S Hopkins)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Laws in the Isle of Man
Date: 8 Apr 92 02:50:10 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

keb3@po.CWRU.Edu (Keith E. Bitely) writes:

>In a previous article, emcmanus@gr.osf.org (Eamonn McManus) says:

>>Well she [Queen Vic] was right, wasn't she? I mean *obviously* you
can't have sex
>>without sticking at least one penis into at least one orifice.

>There wasn't a smiley, so I don't know if you're using sarcasm or not.  But,
>I definitely do not believe that the above is true.

Ha ha!  Someone has some sarcasm impairment here ...

>>Besides, surely both women couldn't lie back and think of England at
>>the same time, or nothing would happen.

>huh?

This is a kind of euphemism for the point of view that maintains that
women don't (or aren't supposed to) enjoy sex.  It is a very Victorian
kind of expression, combining a kind of hypocritical puritanism with
patriotism.  In other words, Eamonn is being sarcastic again.  Hold on,
Eamonn, does this not make it more than once now that you have
"intruded" into soc.bi?  Please do so more often!

Sara
-- 
 >{8-)  Sara Hopkins  (-8}<                      ______             ^
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St.   \  / / Glorious OOO
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662   \/\/   Stereo  ++  
 >  sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk  < < Six of one, half a dozen of the other >
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Sara's ElectroPostie)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: bisexuality a fad? (was Re: Bisexuality and Furries...)
Date: 12 Apr 92 17:39:31 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

orc@vpnet.chi.il.us (david parsons) writes:

>sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Sara's ElectroPostie) writes:
>|Oooh, long haired men, mmm, what can I say?  Red, blonde, brown, black,
>|I'm no fussed ...

>   Hmm.  When's the next flight to Edinburgh? (I've not cut my hair in
>4 years now :-)

<interested look>  Really??  Now this reminds me of a *good* friend of
mine ...

Sara
-- 
 >{8-)  Sara Hopkins  (-8}<                      ______             ^
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St.   \  / / Glorious OOO
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662   \/\/   Stereo  ++  
 >  sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk  < < Six of one, half a dozen of the other >
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: pwiebe@ecst.csuchico.edu (stephanie mandell)
Subject: Knocking Celibacy  
Organization: California State University, Chico
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 19:01:59 GMT

In article <1992Apr15.180008.9028@cs.tcd.ie> cjmchale@cs.tcd.ie (Ciaran McHale) writes:

>In <1992Apr15.152007.11950@ecst.csuchico.edu>
>pwiebe@ecst.csuchico.edu (stephanie mandell) writes:
>
>>In article <20206@castle.ed.ac.uk> sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (S Hopkins) writes:
>>>Shy, huh?  Hmmm ... and I'm tee-total ... and celibate ...
>>
>>So, Sara, looks to me like you're knocking celibacy.  
>
>Me thinks that you misread the sarcasm in Sara's posting. Reread what
>she was replying to. If that doesn't work then replace Sara's line with:
>
>	Shy, huh? Hmmm ... and pigs can fly
>[...]

>Ciaran.

And if your average straight 19 year old male said:
 
        Shy, huh?  Hmmm ... and I'm gay

Wouldn't we all have a thing or two to say to him?

Steph

Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: orc@vpnet.chi.il.us (david parsons)
Subject: Re:  Bi Quotes
Organization: Department of Atomic Text Units
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 00:09:07 GMT

In article <1992Apr9.012037.9025@midway.uchicago.edu> pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
|In article <rhialto.0022@falu.sneakernet> rhialto@cs.kun.nl writes:
|>In article <1992Mar30.040827.5166@vax.oxford.ac.uk> cen@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
|>>Is my reputation as insatiable lustmonster hunting redheads dampened yet?
|>Nope! I guess we'll have to create a list of redheads,
|the great red-head hunt is on!!!!
|olaf's keeping the list, with names and (hopefully) e-mail 
|addresses!  (if have red hair and wantto be hunted, let him 
|know (-:)  ...


   But don't do it by email, 'cause then the other lists that some
of us are carefully keeping will get out of date, and we can't have
that ;-)

                __
  david parsons \/ orc@pell.chi.il.us
From: jclark@sdcc3.ucsd.edu (John Clark)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Bi's Attacked ?? What to you think??
Date: 5 Apr 92 18:35:09 GMT
Article-I.D.: sdcc12.31360
Organization: University of California, San Diego

In article <1992Apr4.150241.14066@panix.com> habs@panix.com (Harry Shapiro) writes:
+ 
+ There  was a problem not too long ago in the Gay and Lesbian Forum on
+ america online; separate conference rooms were desired for the bisexual
+ members, who wanted their own space. Certain lesbians were vocal about
+ having their own space.  TV/TS/CGs then took up the hue and cry. My point
+ throughout the whole debacle was (and is) by breaking ourselves down into
+ smaller and smaller groups, we are breaking down our "mental living
+ environment" at the same time -- which only serves to reinforce
+ self-induced closeting, stereotypes

This is called 'Balkanization'. It is a term used by paleo-conservatives
to depect the reduction to small compartements of views in a group
which 'should' be a major force if the individual groups could be less
insistent on 'identity' and 'distinctness'.

Yet it seems to pop up all the time. I was at a conference last
which, PEPCON, which had 2 anounced forums for bisexuals, one under
the banner of 'bisexual' and the other 'lesbian and bisexuals'. Well,
it seemed to me that the former was the one I should attend. But
then I found out later the L/B group had only the 2 two lesbian
coordinators and one bisexual woman, none of them aware of the other
forum. As it was the 'bisexual' group consisted in 5-6 men and one
woman, until a another group from a completely different topic, I
think it was some sort of drum beating or chanting thing, which didn't
have a quarum either joined and increased the number of women in the group.
-- 

John Clark
jclark@ucsd.edu
From: max@drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu (Max Handelsman: liberal hippie subversive dude.)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: e-flirts
Date: 17 Apr 92 20:36:01 GMT
Organization: The Loonie Bin

In article <1992Apr17.102721.3231@ecst.csuchico.edu>, pwiebe@ecst.csuchico.edu (stephanie mandell) writes:
>
> I will go sit back down on the
> couch and blow bubbles for a while.  
> 
	I think I'll join you.  I've still got two bottles left, if anyone 
else wants to play.  (Actually, it's that I have to write that 12-15 page 
paper for my senior seminar.)
	Oh, and I can probably make either of the two later dates for the 
NE get-together, and probably give a ride to a few people...if I'm still 
invited.

	-Max, enjoying a good grumpy funk.
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: rhiann@milton.u.washington.edu (Sandra Hereld)
Subject: Re: Bi Quotes and Red Heads
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 17:29:13 GMT

In article <1992Apr10.072050.5383@vax.oxford.ac.uk> cen@vax.oxford.ac.uk writes:
>
>>rhiann@u.washington.edu (Sandy Hereld) writes: re excessive collaboration 
>
>Well, peg? Nothing exceeds like excess, so they say. So, the Seattle orgy is
>Sandy, peg, Ellen & me so far..?
>
>Tanaqui 

Well, gentlemen - don't be shy...

(And Joy, Bellingham is certainly close enough... Think of yourself as just
one *big* hug away.)

Sandy	We don't want queers with good taste...
 		We want queers that taste good!
From: cen@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Looking for fun sex games to play.
Date: 14 Apr 92 02:09:22 GMT
Followup-To: soc.bi
Organization: Oxford University VAXcluster


 Albert-Lunde@nwu.edu (Albert Lunde) writes in reply to a 19(!) yr old:
> You might get interesting ideas by reading: "Susie Sexpert's
> Lesbian Sex World" by Susie Bright 

Indeed you might. However, since you and your main partner are male, don't
bother hunting the (perineal sponge/) G spot & especially *don't* try inserting
those Chinese jangly balls unless you have plenty of astroglide on hand.

They're more meant for an orifice you don't have..

> Another thought is to talk with your partner and find out better what
> makes each of you "hot".  It's been easier for me to talk in the
> abstract than communicate with someone I was involved with.

Yeah. Your descriptions sounded not so much blunt as, well, clinical. 
 
> Play safe, take your time, use plenty of lubrication, relax, and have fun.

Playtime!! <flirt, flirt>

Tanaqui

"Light Venus... with thy tribade trine, invent new sports"     Ben Jonson
From: kmj1@PL118f.cc.lehigh.edu (kate marie)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: too perverse? (was Re: I am Muffin! I am INVINCIBLE!)
Date: 10 Apr 92 22:56:17 GMT
	<1992Apr8.053901.9165@midway.uchicago.edu>
	<1992Apr08.190100.29272@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> <3076@cs.rit.edu>
Organization: Lehigh University Student Konsultants

In article <3076@cs.rit.edu> kdc5072@cs.rit.edu (Kevin D Colagio) writes:

hi kevin!

> In article <1992Apr08.190100.29272@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
>   rivk@midway.uchicago.edu wrote...
>   >In article <1992Apr08.011556.14554@rat.csc.calpoly.edu> pclary@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Ellen Clary) writes:
>   >>the celebration may commence!
>   >>Welcome to soc.bi kate!
>   >>There will be an April ex-muffin initiation.  But we haven't 
>   >>worked out all the details yet <grin>.  Any suggestions gang?
>   >
>   >Am I invited, or did I demuffin too early?

>   Absolutely!  March folk have the option of being on either
>   the giving or receiving end (or both if you wish <grin>).

you mean i don't get a choice?

> Giving and Receiving ends...hmmm, sounds like fun!

> "the only problem with being between two men, is someone is going to get
> messy!"> 

thought that was the idea?
 
kate

still .sigless
From: mjl@rigel.bos.locus.com (Mike Leibensperger)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Biphobia in TORCH SONG?
Date: 8 Apr 92 22:00:23 GMT
Reply-To: mjl@Bos.Locus.COM
Organization: Locus Computing Corp., Boston Office


I've read the text, but have never seen "Torch Song Trilogy"
performed.  Plays are meant to be performed, so the interpretation of
the director stands for a lot.  Still, I concur with Tim in that the
way Ed is portrayed in about the first two-thirds of it really pissed
me off.  But I'm not sure I'd be so forgiving as to say, as Tim does,
that the whole negative portrayal is set up so that in the final part
it can be torn down.  Ed's character is extremely unpalatable to me.
I don't recall that the audience is given any firm reason to
believe that Ed won't have a relapse and return to is
negative-stereotyped bi ways.  Does anyone recall otherwise?

Most of Ed's speeches really bummed me out.

	mjl

--
Michael J. Leibensperger      "Rats and roaches live by competition under the
Locus Computing/Boston		 laws of supply and demand; it is the privilege
25 Mall Road; Burlington MA	     of human beings to live under the laws of
01803 (617)229-4980 mjl@locus.com       justice and mercy."  -- Wendell Berry
Member of the League for Programming Freedom --- write league@prep.ai.mit.edu
Newsgroups: soc.bi
From: tal@plts.uucp (Tom Limoncelli)
Subject: How do you feel about Outing, a quick poll.
Organization: Tom's Box of Ahedonia
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 04:48:16 GMT

I've noticed many people posting that they are against outing no matter
what.  Most people on the net do not know my position on outing, and I
request people that do know please hold their tongue.

So, here's the question for people that say that they are against
outing "no matter what":

Situation:  Sodomy is declared illegal in all 50 states.  In fact,
those caught are stigmatized and are black-listed.  They are fired and
the black-list makes it difficult for them to get a job.  There are
many witchhunt-style searches for gays and more so lesbians.

One day you discover that the procecutor that oversees 100% of all the
arrests is, himself, a homosexual.  Not only is he homosexual, but he
is well-know at the town's local gay bar.

What do you do?  Do you tell anyone?  Do you bring it to the press?
Do you "out" him?  What if he wasn't the prosecutor but ranked high
enough that he could put an end to all investigations and might even
be able to have the law overturned?

(go to the next page for the rest of this post)

The situation I just described is the U.S. military.  Many gay men,
bisexuals, and (mostly) lesbians are given dishonorable discharges each
year.  It is difficult to find work with such a thing on your record.
The highest ranking civilian is Pete Williams; he could stop it; he
could end it for good; he is 100% gay.

Did I just do a bad thing by outing him?  How do you know I'm telling
you the truth?  During Desert Storm each night we watched on the news
casts as Pete Williams gave the daily reports of what is happening with
the war in those cute Presidential Press Conferences.  Every American
has seen this man.  He's young, cute, smart, and well spoken.  Would it
make a difference to the straight world if they were told?  Would it
make a difference to our sisters and brothers in the armed forces if
Pete's secret was widely known?

I'm interested in other people's opinions, especially from those people
that are against outing.

Tom
-- 
Tom Limoncelli -- tal@plts.uucp (play) -- tal@warren.mentorg.com (work)
From: sara@castle.ed.ac.uk (Sara's ElectroPostie)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: Re: Tori Amos
Keywords: beautiful talented pianist singer redhead
Date: 12 Apr 92 21:11:27 GMT
Organization: News Addicts

wells@cs.hw.ac.uk (Francis Wells) writes:

>Comparisons with Kate Bush are mostly apt (wrt Music) but I think the element
>of Discordancy is more similar to the music of Siouxsie (of Siouxsie and the 
>Banshees fame).

Um, what I had in mind definitely sounds like Kate to me, it was mainly
the piano ysee and piano doesn't feature prominently in Siouxsie's
stuff.  But vocally there could be comparisons except that Siouxsie
usually sings flat and Tori doesn't and their voices are totally
different.  Don't get me wrong, I'm a big Siouxsie fan as *well* as a
Kate fan. 

>        This pink triangle was drawn \bi/ Francis Joseph Wells
>My .sig has changed.                  \/                    wells@hci.hw.ac.uk

A watter eh?  I did the KBS MSc - you're doing the HCI one I take it? 
Good luck ... for the move to Riccie if nothing else!  (I take it HCI's
going to Riccie?)

Sara
-- 
 >{8-)  Sara Hopkins  (-8}<                      ______             ^
 Geography Dept.  Edinburgh Uni.  Drummond St.   \  / / Glorious OOO
 Edinburgh,  EH8  9XP,  UK. +44 (0/31) 650 2662   \/\/   Stereo  ++  
 >  sara@geovax.ed.ac.uk  < < Six of one, half a dozen of the other >
From: leisti@cc.helsinki.fi (Teemu Leisti)
Newsgroups: soc.bi
Subject: The Mayor of Castro Street (was Re: Outing?)
Date: 7 Apr 92 17:03:38 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki

In article <1992Apr4.050436.8173@amhux2.amherst.edu>,
 twpierce@amhux1.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce) writes:

> When Oliver Stone announced his intent to produce THE MAYOR OF CASTRO
> STREET, there was apparently something of a rush for applications to
> play Harvey Milk.

Is this going to be Stone's next film, or has it been made already?

--  Teemu Leisti  /  U. of Helsinki, Finland  /  leisti@cc.helsinki.fi

The Net:  A wonderful invention enabling one to make enemies
          quickly and easily across the globe.