HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com (Jim Mann)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: New Zucker Brothers movie(rental)  "Brain Donors"..anyone see it?
Date: 21 Dec 1992 18:22:15 GMT
Organization: Stratus Computer Inc, Marlboro MA
Distribution: usa
Reply-To: jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: gondolin.pubs.stratus.com

In article <1992Dec21.173856.311@news.cs.brandeis.edu>  
st923459@pip.cc.brandeis.edu writes:
> >While renting another video this weekend I saw a preview for  
"Brain Donors"
> >
> which is now available on video.  It is a Zucker Bros. film(the  
Airplane! guys)
> >and was wondering if it was any good.  The preview looked like it  
would be
> >a dumb movie but I have liked about every other movie they've  
produced.
> 
> I haven't seen it, but the critics say it's an homage to the  
classic Marx 
> Bros. comedy A NIGHT AT THE OPERA.  Said it was bad.  Real bad.  
Awful.

No, it was actually reasonably good. It's not as good as
A Night at the Opera (few comedies are) but it was still very
funny.  And the opening credits are marvelous.  It is certainly
worth renting or catching on cable.


--
Jim Mann            
Stratus Computer   jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com  

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,oracle.corp.misc
From: gswan@psych.toronto.edu (George Swan)
Subject: Re: WARNING: a few good men : BAD PRINT
Organization: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 20:48:50 GMT

To: eandersn@mach1.wlu.ca
Subject: Re: WARNING: a few good men : BAD PRINT
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,oracle.corp.misc
Organization: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
Cc: 
Bcc: 

In article <BzpwBG.3Du@mach1.wlu.ca> eandersn@mach1.wlu.ca writes:

After commenting on the availability of good prints for
A few good men, and asking if the original poster asked
for free tickets to see the film again, once the print was
fixed, eandersn goes on to discuss focus problems.

>even minor sync problems.  Something else I hate is when the projectionist
>can't quite get the picture in focus!
>

I see you are from Waterloo.  I hate it when the picture isn't
in focus too.  It bugs me enough that I will sometime get up,
hunt for the manager, and ask him to get the film focussed.
After having done this four or five times, over a period of
several years, I realized that every time had been in the "Waterloo"
theatre, in downtown Waterloo, Ontario.

Every time I asked them to focus the film, the projectionist
clearly spent twenty or thirty seconds fiddlying with the
focus, but really, it wasn't any more satisfactory after the
fiddling than before.  As I watched them fiddle with the focus
on the last occasion, I cam to the conclusion that the combination
of lense system, and screen in the Waterloo wasn't capable of having
the entire screen in sharp focus.  Instead it seemed capable of having
only a broad ring in focus, as when the projectionist fiddled with
the focus the diameter of the ring changed.

I wonder how many theatres suffer from this problem?
From: pamm@hpmwtd.sr.hp.com (Pam Milligan)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 00:41:06 GMT
Subject: Re: Emma Thompson film
Organization: HP Santa Rosa Site (SRSD MWTD)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies






wood@siemens.com. (Jim Wood) writes:  

rod@cats.ucsc.edu (Rodrick Su) writes:


>	Now that LA and NY film critic circles and National Film board 
>	has come up with their selection of the best.  Emma Thompson was
>	one item of agreement for all three as best actress.  One ponders
>	the meaning...

>>         She was unbelievably excellent in the film.
                                             ^^^ ^^^^    

      What Emma Thompson film? 

      Thanks,
      Pam Milligan  
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: dascoser@cybernet.cse.fau.edu (david serchay)
Subject: Re: Black Holes of Cinema
Organization: Cybernet BBS, Boca Raton, Florida
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 05:46:51 GMT

ballerup@diku.dk (Per Goetterup) writes:

> idathon@uts.uni-c.dk (Hans O. Nymand) writes:
> 
> >>mgrimes@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Michael Grimes) writes:
> 
> [...]
> >>>   Any more nominees......?
> 
> >Kim Basinger  		<- No! - watch "Nadine" and change your mind!
> >Arnold Schwarzzenegger <- Nah, he's much better than Stallone, look at
>                            "Kindergarden Cop" and see why.
> 
> --
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | Per Goetterup, Student, DIKU                 InterNet: ballerup@ask.diku.dk
> |                                                      pgoetter@nyx.cs.du.edu
> | FidoNet: 2:231/91.10    -or-      Per.Goetterup@p10.f91.n231.z2.fidonet.org
> |                                                                            
> | DIKU is the department of Computer Science at the University of Copenhagen.
> |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | The most merciful thing in the world I think, is the inability of the human
> | mind to corrolate all its contents...              - H.P. Lovecraft, 1926 -
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "...Silence for a moment, I close my eyes. Entering the darkness, a different
> world. Never to be recognized in what we call reality... Always another scene
> always another show..."                                 ('Mindtravelling', PT
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Dwight Shultz. He's wonderful in "Fat Man and Little Boy" and "The Long 
Walk Home."

Dascoser
From: kipper@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Kip Ingram)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: 9 1/2 Weeks
Date: 28 Dec 92 06:30:33 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

>From article <1992Dec20.145422.10366@Virginia.EDU>, by tlc9y@Virginia.EDU ("tara lou"):
>> you do not have to be a lesbian or an abused survivor in order
>> to believe that our society dictates men's satisfaction over
>> women's..i see beer commercials that satisfy men's needs [i
>> drink beer, too], sportscar commercials [i would like one,
>> too], and many other instances where men's pleasure is the
>> aim..not women's.
>

Well, I suppose this is no doubt a reflection of the fact that men have more
money to dispose of than women.  Although there are plenty of female beer
suckers out there (I guess you can tell that I don't like beer), there's no
doubt in my mind that men spend *far* more money on beer than women do.  So
it's not suprising that beer commercials cater to men's whims and fancies.

How many commercials do you see trying to sell dishwashing liquid to men?  I
don't recall having ever seen Madge tell a man "Your soaking in it".  Which is
funny, because *I* do the dishes in my house, at least most of the time.

Come on, little girl.  Grow up.  The dollar drives the world.  Just live and
let live and don't worry about it.  Have fun!  Make your *own* life the way you
want it; don't bother with the rest of the world.
From: huston@access.digex.com (Herb Huston)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: ALL FALL DOWN; Brandon de Wylde
Date: 2 Jan 1993 20:37:32 GMT
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
NNTP-Posting-Host: access.digex.com

In article <1993Jan2.012349.18790@rigel.econ.uga.edu> hughes@dogwood.botany.uga.edu (Wayne Hughes) writes:
}  And whatever happened to Brandon de Wylde?  Saw him first
}  in _Hud_ with Paul Newman, and thought he was pretty good.
}  AFD confirmed that for me; it seems he had considerable
}  talent.  But the last work I can find for him was around
}  1965.

Brandon de Wilde has been dead since 1972.

-- Herb Huston
-- huston@access.digex.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jmartin@ntmtv.UUCP (Jeff Martin)
Subject: Re: Highest gross movies
Originator: jmartin@cleomed
Organization: Northern Telecom Incorporated
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 21:07:57 GMT

From article <BzBoB7.AB2@peora.sdc.ccur.com>, by tran@peora.sdc.ccur.com (Nhan Tran):
> 
> When people talk about the highest grossing movie, do they take into
> account of inflation?  A more accurate measure would be listing 
> of movies with largest number of sold tickets.

...Taking into account population growth...

Jeff Martin
From: rorschak@daimi.aau.dk (Jesper Lauridsen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: The Player (was Re: Academy Awards)
Date: 2 Jan 93 20:05:30 GMT
Organization: Exile Government of Bramming

frankm@microsoft.com (Frank R.A.J. Maloney) writes:

>In article <31DEC199210214769@utkvx1.utk.edu> takoosma@utkvx1.utk.edu (Toby Koosman) writes:
>[deletion]
>>It seems to be on everyone's list, which I find puzzling.  The Player was a
>>cute movie, clever and well-done, but certainly not a great movie.  Even
>>restricting the field to comedies, Husbands and Wives was far better.  Perhaps
>>its special appeal to movie buffs explains the high rating?
>>

>On the other hand, I am amongst those you so blithely dismiss as buffs
>-- and another poster as the artsy-fartsy crowd (and I can assure you
>there nothing artistical about my wind) -- who were mightily impressed
>by THE PLAYER. 
>I do happen to think that THE PLAYER will be become one of a trio of
>great insider films about Hollywood, along with SUNSET BOULEVARD and
>THE BAD AND THE BEAUTIFUL.

>And I'm not at all sure how it is you think you can read and post to
>rec.arts.movies and not be a "movie buff" by default. There ain't
>nobody here but buffs -- some of us talk about why we like and dislike,
>whereas others of us merely announce that they do.

Having seen 103 movies (video not counted) in 1992 I think that I qualify
as a "movie buff" (or on my way to be one), and I really can't see what
is so great about The Player. It was funny, entertaining, a bit predictable
but overall well made. Good professional work, but great? No.

-- 
Jesper Lauridsen        | Je ne suis pas un voyou
rorschak@daimi.aau.dk   | Je suis Monsieur Hire 
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: ericb@sierra.com (Eric Blood)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: Some Minor Jurassic Park News From Nat. Geo.
Date: 29 Dec 92 18:17:02 GMT
Organization: Sierra Geophysics Inc.,  Kirkland, Wa

In article <1992Dec28.082810.377@news.uwyo.edu> rtravsky@news.uwyo.edu (Rich Travsky) writes:
>Just got the January '93 National Geographic, with a nice main
>article on dinosaurs. In said article, they had some info on
>the upcoming Jurassic Park.
>
>They have a marvelous picture of the T. Rex under construction.
>One "life" size T. rex, a couple smaller models.
>
>The accompanying text (told from the article's author's perspective):
>
>	At the Stan Winston Studio in Los Angeles, I see a fleet of
>	dinosaurs being built to star in the Steven Spielberg movie
>	"Jurassic Park", based on the best-selling novel by Michael
>	Crichton. Crichton imagines that bioengineers clone a zoo of
>	dinosaurs from ancient DNA.  They collect DNA from dinosaur 
>	biting insects preserved in amber. The clones are raised on
>	a private island off Costa Rica as the stars of an intended
>	theme park. A series of technical breakdowns lets the animals
>	escape. Some spread to the Central American mainland,
>	presumably to breed in the wild and eventually terrorize the
>	world.
>
>	"This could be the 'Jaws' of the nineties," says spokesman
>	Martin Levy. "It's had the longest preproduction of any of 
>	Steven's films. We've come a long way from Godzilla. These 
>	dinosaurs will move so fluidly you won't realize they aren't
>	living animals."
>
>	"We have five main characters," says studio art coordinator
>	John Rosengrant. "A T-rex, a sick Triceratops, a spitting
>	Dilophosaurus, a Brachiosaurus - and the velociraptors."
>
>	I meet each one. T-rex is the biggest - but it's only a
>	mechanized black frame at this stage. The Brachiosaurus 
>	would be larger, but the studio is re-creating just its 
>	head and neck.
>
>Not much new information, but that photo is something else.
>
>+---------+    Richard Travsky  RTRAVSKY @ CORRAL . UWYO . EDU
>|         |    Division of Information Technology
>|     U W |    University of Wyoming   (307) 766 - 3663 / 3668
>|      *  |    "Wyoming is the capital of Denver." - a tourist
>+---------+    "One of those square states." - another tourist


-- 
Eric V. Blood
ericb@sierra.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: librdb@gsusgi2.gsu.edu (Roy D. Berridge)
Subject: Re: Most Overrated Actor/Actress
Organization: Georgia State University
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 13:22:08 GMT

 Most overrated actress:  Barbra Streisand.  Hands down.  She's also
 pretty high on the list of overrated singers.  She's rotten.


 Roy Berridge
From: pwickman@cerebus.cc.edu (Paul J. Wickman)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: TOYS - where was it filmed
Date: 21 Dec 92 15:44:53 GMT
Reply-To: pwickman@cerebus.cc.edu (Paul J. Wickman)
Organization: Carroll College-Waukesha, WI


	Can someone PLEASE tell me where those beautiful rolling grass hills
used in the film TOYS (Robin Williams) are located?  If it was mentioned in
the closing credits I missed it.

Email answers please.

Thanks very much
--
Paul J. Wickman - Analyst/Programmer  Harnischfeger Corporation
Internet: pwickman@carroll1.cc.edu

"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: esprit@netcom.com (Alan F. Perry)
Subject: Re: Underrated Actor:  Alan Rickman 
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 15:57:36 GMT

In article <1992Dec31.040557.27861@psych.toronto.edu> anna@psych.toronto.edu (Anna Filippone) writes:
>Definitely Alan Rickman.  I saw two films he was in this weekend.  One was  
>"Close My Eyes" where he played the husband of a woman who has an affair
>with her brother.  The other was "Truly, Madly, Deeply" -- a film I heard
>being called the film that "Ghost" should have been (and I agree).  Both
>films are highly recommended.
>
>And you must admit that he was the best part of Robin Hood:  Prince of
>Thieves as the Sherriff of Nottingham.
>
>Has he been in other films?  

Quigley: Down Under
  Played the top bad guy Australian land owner

Die Hard
  Played the top bad guy terrorist

-- 
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Alan F. Perry                      | "e-mail is wrecking my life"
esprit@netcom.com        (home)    |            - some random person 
allan@hakkinen.lynx.com  (work)    |              standing in San Francisco
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: ssc@nwu.edu (Steven Chung)
Subject: Re: Most Underrated Actor/Actress
Originator: schung@casbah.acns.nwu.edu
Organization: Northwestern University, Evanston Illinois.
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 03:15:43 GMT

In article <2347@hsdndev.UUCP> nhmas@gauss.med.harvard.edu (Mark Shneyder) writes:
# 
# If I was a director I would've went with Kathleen Turner and Gerard.

Can Turner do 'innocent?'
From: George.Harris@launchpad.unc.edu (George Harris)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: spielberg
Date: 24 Dec 92 01:16:12 GMT
Distribution: rec
Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service

In article <1992Dec23.1489.35537@channel1> "eric walker" <eric.walker@channel1.com> writes:
>CTT>        I think Spielberg's going to make a JURASSIC PARK that will be
>CTT>entertaining and pretty to look at, but (sadly) I don't think he's going to
>CTT>inject with even a fraction of the suspense or energy he put into
>CTT>JAWS.
>
>This may seem like a silly idea, guys, but maybe we should wait until
>JURASSIC PARK is actually released to theaters before we pass
>judgement?

	You're right.  It IS a silly idea.

	Now let me rave about The Hudsucker Proxy...

--
"If you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce, they taste more like
prunes than rhubarb does."		-Groucho Marx

George.Harris@launchpad.unc.edu		or, preferably	gharris@jade.tufts.edu
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: roland@quadsys.com (Roland Besserer)
Subject: Re: Kate Capshaw
Organization: QUAD Systems
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 17:22:01 GMT

lape@cs.utk.edu (Bryon S. Lape) writes:
: 	What movies has Kate Capshaw played in??  I know she is in "Temple
: of Doom," but what else?
: 

Black Rain  - Ridley Scott

If you havn't seen that one - you must. 
-- 

Roland Besserer
QUAD Systems
roland@quadsys.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Naked Lunch
From: lcornel@eis.calstate.edu (Louis Cornelio)
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 03:29:39 GMT
Organization: Calif State Univ/Electronic Information Services

Gee, for me it was just good bug-sex.

Dr. Benway

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: feathers@serss0 (Michael Feathers)
Subject: Re: Sick and tired of cries of sexism (was Re: 9 1/2 Weeks)
Organization: Florida International University, Miami
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 13:27:40 GMT


>>From article <1992Dec20.145422.10366@Virginia.EDU>, by tlc9y@Virginia.EDU ("tara lou"):
>>> you do not have to be a lesbian or an abused survivor in order
>>> to believe that our society dictates men's satisfaction over
>>> women's..i see beer commercials that satisfy men's needs [i
>>> drink beer, too], sportscar commercials [i would like one,
>>> too], and many other instances where men's pleasure is the
>>> aim..not women's.

I'm sure that one of the reasons that this topic shows up in relation to
movies is the difference between male and female stimulation.  Men are
predominately stimulated by images.  It is biological and it is no
accident that the market for pornography has always been and continues to
be predominately driven by males.  On the other hand, female stimulation
is more situational and tactile.  A story about the tall dark powerful man
who sweeps a woman off her feet will always be with us.

I would be prepared to renounce all "objectification" of women in movies if
all "objectification" of men in romance novels was renounced.  Many women will
say that it is not the same but I don't think so.  If the argument can be
made that men are more likely to be sexually violent because of what they see
on film, then surely it could be said that women's expectations, fostered by
romance novels, spark sometimes life ruining competition among men to be the
man with the big car, summer house, and corporate neck-tie.  Objectification
goes both ways.

What many people do not understand is that men and women feel their 
sexuality in different ways.  Millions of years of evolution have made this
so.  It is wrong to judge women by men's standards and equally wrong to 
judge men by women's standards.  Unfortunately, many of the victimologists
in our culture do not understand this.  


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: mattm@Apple.COM (Matthew Melmon)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: The Player (was Re: Academy Awards)
Date: 31 Dec 92 22:40:09 GMT
Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA

isbell@ai.mit.edu (Charles L Isbell) writes:

>Personally I loved it.  I don't think it has a chance come Oscar time,
>but then, so what?

Indeed, so what.  The Oscars are absurd.  Best Picture of the Year!
TaDah!  It is ridiculous to reduce all of the films released for
a year to One Best Picture.

But, that's the way it goes.  Glittering prizes and endless 
compromises.
From: porges@beretta.camb.inmet.com (Don Porges)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: re. Citizen Kane Question
Date: 29 Dec 92 20:32:36 GMT
Organization: Intermetrics Inc.

In article <L25iwB4w165w@cybernet.cse.fau.edu> dascoser@cybernet.cse.fau.edu (david serchay) writes:
>flip@sage.cc.purdue.edu (Phillip D. Russell) writes:
>
>> In article <1992Dec23.144603.29202@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> dtussey@magnus.
>> >The fact that Rosebud was the name of Kane's sled as a boy is a fundamental 
>> >part of the movie, as I see it.  The entire movie is about a man who is 
>> >searching for happiness.  The sled symbolizes the happiness and comfort he f
>> >as a boy, and that was taken away from him.  A big deal is made about the 
>> >Rosebud reference because it is the symbol for everyman's search for happine
>> 
.
.
.
.>
>Another interesting "sled" thing, was that the new sled that Thatcher 
>gave him, was named "Crusader", Foreshadowing his eventuall crusades 
>against big business.
>
>Dascoser

If we're going to be playing this game:  note that Kane almost found
Rosebud again during his life.  He was on his way to go through
his mother's old things in a warehouse -- but instead, he met
Susan Alexander.

-- 
					-- Don Porges
					porges@inmet.camb.inmet.com
					..uunet!inmet!porges
From: fugitt@tempus.Corp.Sun.COM (Lem Fugitt - Nihon Sun US Office)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: FOREVER YOUNG
Date: 21 Dec 1992 21:37:50 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: fugitt@tempus.Corp.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: tempus.corp.sun.com

In article 28035@microsoft.com, frankm@microsoft.com (Frank R.A.J. Maloney) writes:
	[...]
<=>see more of Wendt than we do.  Isabel Glasser is Gibson's love in the
<=>1939 sequence in an promising debut.
<=>

I thought that 'Pure Country' was her debut. Did she do Forever Young
first? Pure Country was certainly in the theaters first - - at least here
in the San Francisco area.

---
====================================================
| lem.fugitt@Corp.Sun.COM   Nihon Sun U.S. Office  |
| (415) 688-9570 (Voice)    (415) 688-9025 (Fax)   |
|        "The map is not the territory"            |


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: faa@athena.cs.wayne.edu (Felicitas A. Atabong)
Subject: HELP with "Summer of My German Soldier"
Organization: Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 00:39:54 GMT

I saw a movie a few years back, called "Summer of my German Soldier,"
with Kristy McNichol (I think). It was about a young abused Jewish girl
in the south who met a German soldier on the run, and kept him hidded.
It was such a beautiful move. I would like to see it again or purchase
it but I can't find it anywhere. I live in the Detroit area. If anyone
has any info on this I would appreciate it by e-mail.

Feli.
From: merlyn@ora.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Digital Dolby (was Re: TOYS)
Date: 25 Dec 92 18:33:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: agora.MERLYN.92Dec25103335
Organization: Stonehenge Consulting Services; Portland, Oregon, USA

In article <1992Dec19.220841.28070@microsoft.com> frankm@microsoft.com (Frank R.A.J. Maloney) writes:
   TOYS was a disappointment. I had hoped for something a lot
   more energetic, if nothing else. There is no plot, merely a
   skeleton on which to hang a dazzling visual experience.
   Michael Gambon and Robin Williams were both too restrained,
   too whimsical. They were both outshone by Joan Cusak, the
   only member of the cast who really got the idea of what they
   should have been doing. In fact, the rapper LL Cool J put in
   a more interesting performance, even given his inexperience
   as an actor.

Totally agreed.  In fact, I had really been hoping (from seeing the
trailers and having just come down from a post-ALADDIN high) that TOYS
would be the "Willy Wonka" of the 90's.

Sadly, it wasn't.  I'll have to keep waiting.

The only thing that made it worth seeing was that it was the premiere
of Digital Dolby at the third screen in three months here in Portland.
I was in the first public audience for all three: THE MIGHTY DUCKS
(yuck), ALADDIN (thumbs and swords up), and then TOYS.  And today I
will see THX *70mm* Digital Dolby for HOFFA (another first in
Portland).  Way cool.

Just another video producer, looking for the best in theatre sight and sound,
-- 
Randal L. Schwartz / Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095
merlyn@ora.com (semi-permanent) merlyn@agora.rain.com (for newsreading only)
phrase: "Welcome to Portland, Oregon ... home of the California Raisins!"
From: danielw@hpopd.pwd.hp.com (Daniel Wink)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 10:16:01 GMT
Subject: Re: TOP TEN MOVIES, as of 23 December 1993
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, CCSY Messaging Centre, UK.