HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: [386bsd] GNU malloc in favor of BSD malloc in libc - shall we vote?
Date: 2 Jan 93 00:45:36 GMT
Organization: Panix Public Access Internet & Unix, NYC

In article <1992Dec31.232412.14996@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gsh7w@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy) writes:
>In article <1hvu79INNjqq@ftp.UU.NET> sef@Kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:
>#GNU malloc is copylefted.  Using it in a library means that every program
>#compiled using that library is copylefted.  That is almost certainly the
>#reason why it is not used, and I cannot fault anyone for that.
>
>Well, this would mean that programs would have to be distributed under
>the less restrictive GLPL instead of the GPL, but I still bet many
>people won't like this restriction. People would be required to ship a
>linkable executable, but would not be forced to release source code.

The Andrew malloc seems pretty good.  Why oughtn't we use it?
-- 
Thor Lancelot Simon	 tls@panix.COM

"Better be careful there.  John might decide to start taking legal action
against people who refuse to buy stuff from him."  --Kevin McBride
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: scardina@sed.stel.com (David Scardina)
Subject: another test
Organization: SED, Stanford Telecom, Reston, VA
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 93 02:32:14 GMT
Com: scardina@sed.stel.com (David Scardina)


-- 
******************************************************************************
*           Sean Brady              * Mary meets dad (Part 1)                *
*    DoD# 1001001 - '82 Seca 750    *  Doctor - "Mary, this is your daddy."  *
*     "Beware of Tipper Gore"       *  Mary - "WAAAAAAAAAAA!!!"              *
From: news@hrd769.brooks.af.mil (InterNet News)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Reading 360K tar disks?
Date: 22 Dec 1992 17:13:11 -0600
Organization: Armstrong Lab MIS, Brooks AFB TX
NNTP-Posting-Host: hrd769.brooks.af.mil

  Does anyone know the magic to make a high density 5 1/4 drive read a
360K tar disk?  I can't remember seeing the instructions anywhere.

TSgt Dave Burgess

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: stripes@pix.com (Josh Osborne)
Subject: Re: Does 386BSD work on systems with 20 megabytes of memory! HELP!
Organization: Pix Technologies -- The company with no adult supervision
Distribution: comp.unix.bsd
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 17:21:46 GMT

In article <1992Dec31.201347.12419@netcom.com> thinman@netcom.com (Technically Sweet) writes:
>It should be feasible to hack the standard I/O library to get 
>always get disk buffers below the 16 meg mark.  Maybe the
>mmap() call can help here?  [...]

You can't fix this from the user level for 2 reasons.  First, memory addresses
seen at teh user level are VM addresses, the 16M boundry is a physical boundry.
So if stdio attempts to do a write from 0x00f000 the memory could really be at
0xf0f000!  Second, you don't even care what address the user wants I/O done
to/from, you do it all to/from the buffer cache (or bounce buffers, if the
16M hack worked).
-- 
           stripes@pix.com              "Security for Unix is like
      Josh_Osborne@Real_World,The          Multitasking for MS-DOS"
      "The dyslexic porgramer"                  - Kevin Lockwood
We all agree on the necessity of compromise.  We just can't agree on
when it's necessary to compromise.       - Larry Wall
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Subject: Re: S3 question - Amancio, are you there?
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 07:24:55 GMT

>
>At work I have the Pittsburg Powercomputing X11R4 server running on an
>Artist XJS 34020 card.  The card has 2M VRAM and 5M program RAM.  It's
>the fastest thing going, period.  I wouldn't trade it for anything
>else for running X on a PC; not an S3 928, not a Mach 32.

Could you run xbench so we can have an approximate idea of how fast
your server and card is?

>I would imagine that the fixed function accellerators are doing better
>at Windows benchmarks because a Windows video driver doesn't have much
>functionality to provide; not like an X server.
>-- 

Also at least on the Jan 93 'Byte  benchmark, the 34020 cards were
pushing 3 bytes per pixel and on their favor is a 512 byte command 
queue.

Also, I would hope that a $2000 graphics card to be fast is 10 times
more expensive that the Actix's graphic card or $200 more than what
my entire 486/33Mhz system cost. I am not flaming here  just gently
want to point out the scales of economics here :-)


>Richard Krehbiel                                 richk@grebyn.com
>OS/2 2.0 will do for me until AmigaDOS for the 386 comes along...

Amancio

-- 
Amancio Hasty           |  
Home: (415) 495-3046    |  ftp-site depository of all my work:
e-mail hasty@netcom.com	|  sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming
From: jkh@whisker.lotus.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: [386bsd] GNU malloc in favor of BSD malloc in libc - shall we vote?
Date: 31 Dec 92 15:40:04 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: Lotus Development Ireland

I would be very much in favor of scrapping BSD malloc forever more and
putting GNU malloc in the C library.  Not only is memory usage far
more efficient, but GNU malloc also returns space to the system;
something BSD malloc does not do.  If the sense of this does not
immediately strike you, then try a small experiment: Start up an emacs
and look at its size with ps.  Now Read in a very large file and
observe the size again.  Finally, delete the buffer containing the
file and look again - it will not have shrunk back to its original
size (nor will it ever - you'll have to exit the emacs to get the space
back).  Try all this with GNU malloc and observe the pleasant difference.

I say we petition Bill to use GNU malloc in preference.  Most folks aren't
going to know enough (or dare) to replace malloc in libc themselves, but
they will notice the very painful state of affairs that trying to work
in a low memory environment brings; why not spare them the pain?

					Jordan
--
Jordan Hubbard		Lotus Development Ireland	jkh@whisker.lotus.ie
I DO NOT SPEAK FOR LOTUS - IT HAS PLENTY OF LAWYERS TO DO THAT FOR IT ALREADY
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: gebhart@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Ralf Gebhart)
Subject: Re: [386BSD] partitioning and other things
Keywords: partition, magic numbers
Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:58:35 GMT

In article <1992Dec21.210848.13226@nas.nasa.gov> tweten@wilbur.nas.nasa.gov (Dave Tweten) writes:
>In article <1992Dec20.221431.12825@cs.cornell.edu> cchase@cs.cornell.edu (Craig Chase) writes:
>>I have just installed 386bsd on my computer and have a few questions:
>
>>2) I am currently running the os/2 2.0 boot manager which allows me to select
>>	which operating system to boot.  Problem, it will not boot 386bsd for
>>	me.  Is there another boot manager available that will work with
>>	dos, os/2 and 386bsd?
>
>There are two which have been posted in the past six months.  OS-BS
           ^^^
         three !
>seems to be the most popular, judging from mentions on the net.  My
>favorite is Booteasy, because it more closely matches my usage patterns.
>
>OS-BS has a fixed default boot partition.  When it asks and you don't
>answer, after a few seconds thats the partition that boots.  By
>contrast, Booteasy uses the last chosen partition as the default.  Since
>I reboot more often than I choose a different boot partition I find it
>more convenient.
>

The third one is called 'pboot' and is the only one of those three that is
able to boot from a second disk, as far as I know.

All three are available at ftp.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
 in /pub/BSD/386BSD/0.1/unofficial/boot-menus

 
    Ralf
From: maxwell@acsu.buffalo.edu (John H. Maxwell)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: IBM--What does it mean? (was: Reading joystick)
Date: 27 Dec 92 00:13:10 GMT
Organization: UB


In <822@nfsun.UUCP> gchamber@nfsun.UUCP (Glenn Chambers) writes:
>>>IBM: Incompatible Brain-damaged Machinery  ;-)
>>IBM: Inferior But Marketable
>>IBM: Industry's Biggest Mistake
>IBM: I've Been Moved
>IBM: International Brotherhood of Magicians
>    (an actual organization)
>IBM: Itty Bitty Machine company
>    (an actual, probably defunct, computer store on the left coast)

Bradley Smith (brad@bradley.edu) writes:
>IBM: I've Been Mislead

How about:
IBM: Idiotic Bunch of Morons
IBM: I Bring Manuals

I can relate to both in my dealings with Big Blue!

    John Maxwell     maxwell@acsu.buffalo.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: [386bsd] what is the status of open-look?
Date: 3 Jan 93 21:13:57 GMT
Distribution: comp.unix.bsd
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)

Hi,

I have not heard much on open-look lately and I was wondering how much
progress has been done towards fully porting open-look?

Thank you,
Amancio
-- 
Amancio Hasty           |  
Home: (415) 495-3046    |  ftp-site depository of all my work:
e-mail hasty@netcom.com	|  sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming
From: fish@ecst.csuchico.edu (Kevin Haddock)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: IBM--What does it mean? (was: Reading joystick)
Date: 27 Dec 92 01:26:18 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico
NNTP-Posting-Host: cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu

In article <373@sleepy.UUCP> pat@sleepy.UUCP (Pat Eyler   ) writes:

[...deleted...]
>
>IBM:  International Brotherhood of Magicians
>    (It's all smoke and mirrors and/or, they keep all their tricks secret.)

One of my favorites is in a .sig from our news administrator:

"IBM, You BM, we all BM for IBM!"


-Kevin
fish@cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu

-------
Hackers do it with fewer instructions!
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: randy@dsndata.dsndata.com (Randy Terbush)
Subject: gcc-2.3.2 and kernel build
Organization: Design Data
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 15:56:59 GMT

I have sucessfully built gcc-2.3.2 on 386BSD, and have begun to use it
to build other packages, and the kernel.

I am tripping over many problems created by running fixincludes, and
using the resulting include files.  What experiences are others
having?  'fixincludes' used gnu 'sed' on my system since I have found
some problems with the supplied 'sed'.

gcc-2.3.2 did find some slight problems in ../../isa/pccons.c with
missing '=' in scantokey and extscantokey tables.

I will follow up with fixes as soon as I get uucp and Emacs up.

-Randy

Randy Terbush ------------------------------------- Design Data, Inc.
UUCP: netcomsv!dsndata!randy ---------------------- 1033 'O' st. Suite 324
INET: randyt@oto.unl.edu -------------------------- Lincoln, NE  68508
--------------------------------------------------- 402-476-8278
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: michaelv@iastate.edu (Michael L. VanLoon)
Subject: IBM--What does it mean? (was: Reading joystick)
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 20:55:48 GMT

In <1247@galileo.rtn.ca.boeing.com> dmp3592@galileo.rtn.ca.boeing.com (Dean M. Phillips) writes:

>IBM: Incompatible Brain-damaged Machinery  ;-)

IBM: Inferior But Marketable
IBM: Industry's Biggest Mistake

Any others? :)

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Michael L. VanLoon                           Project Vincent Systems Staff
  michaelv@iastate.edu              Iowa State University Computation Center
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: jimj@miller.cs.uwm.edu (James Jegers)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Kernel Device Hacking
Date: 28 Dec 1992 16:53:55 GMT
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.9.13


  I'm interested in writing a device driver for the speaker
  on my 386BSD box.  I wrote all of my code, and then when I went
  to compile it it came back saying undefined struct clist.
  I poked around the header files for a while, and could find the
  size of clist defined, but nowhere did I find the actuall structure
  defined?

    Does 386BSD support clists?

    I need some temporary buffers, what can I use instead.  I didn't really
    want to write my own FIFO.

    Also:  I need my driver to be awakened after so many milliseconds.
    can I use the timeout() call to wake myself up?  If so, what
    processor priority does that run as, so I can splx(), the other
    half of the code during critical sections.

 PS.  I was hopeing to write this driver myself, but if anyone
 else already has one, I'd like to look at it.

-- 
     ______________________________________________________________
    /\               University of Wisconsin -- Milwaukee          \
    \_| Computing Services Division     Computer Science Department |
      |   jimj@csd4.csd.uwm.edu           jimj@miller.cs.uwm.edu    |
      |   jimj@convex.csd.uwm.edu                                   |
      |   __________________________________________________________|___
       \_/_____________________________________________________________/
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: antoni@halcyon.com (Toni Moreno)
Subject: Re: [386bsd] Help finding an up-to-date kernel
Organization: The 23:00 News and Mail Service +1 206 382 MAIL (382-6245)
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL4
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 18:16:23 GMT

mark@roissy.umd.edu (Mark Sienkiewicz) writes:
: In article <lje9qaINN4hs@news.bbn.com> blackett@bbn.com (Kent Blackett) writes:
: >
: >I'm really new to 386bsd, and I got to where I am by ftp'ing the distribution
: >files at work, then ftp'ing them to a Mac at work, then writing DOS-format
: >floppies on the Mac, then taking the floppies home to the PC.
: >
: 
: Here's an alternative you can consider.  (I did this for my system.)
: 
: Carry the whole machine in to work and "borrow" an IP address for long
: enough to ftp in the distribution.  You need an ethernet board, of course,
: but if you can borrow one of them too, you're in good shape.
: 
: The install disk comes with the ftp client, which you can use to get
: the distribution over the net.  Be warned-- the kernel on the install
: disk has some debugging left on in the network code, so it will be
: pretty slow to do the transfer.  It took me several hours to get the
: whole bin01, src01, and etc01 distributions over, but I wasn't paying
: attention to it either, so I don't know how long it was waiting for me.
: Mostly, I would look at it once in a while and and see 
: "startstartstartstartstartstartstart" moving across the screen.
: 
: It happens that there was an ethernet board I could borrow, but before I 
: knew that would be the case, I considered buying one for occasions like
: this.  I don't have my tape drive yet, though, so it would be more cost
: effective for me than it would be for you.
: 
: Good luck,
: 
: Mark.

The problem I've found is that I have a 386DX-33 with an ethernet board,
an IP address for me ... but what I haven't is knowing of how to set up
ftp client. I mean how to define all IP addresses of the others'
machines and so...

Happy new year!

Toni Moreno
From: mycroft@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: [386BSD] GCC 2.3.2 floating point problems [FIX/2]
Date: 24 Dec 92 22:55:24 GMT
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab
NNTP-Posting-Host: hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu


Some people have mentioned that `enquire' fails to compile while
building GCC 2.3.2.  Well, this is really a sign of a much larger
problem.

Basically, something is leaving junk on the floating point stack, and
it's overflowing, causing `cc1' to get a floating point exception.  In
some cases, it abort()s, yielding a message about `signal 6', and in
some cases, it cuases a `floating constant out of range' message.  Both
messages are false.

I'm not certain yet exactly what's causing this, but I've fixed it
*TEMPORARILY* [read: long enough to build GCC 2.3.2 and (hopefully) GDB
4.7] by compiling atof.c to assembler code, inserting a `FINIT'
instruction at the beginning of the function, and sticking the modified
version in libc.

NOTE: THIS IS A HORRIBLE KLUDGE.  I will try to do it right once I get
a few key tools built and can actually isolate the problem.  Meanwhile,
if anyone else has already tracked this down, *please* email me info so
I don't waste my time.
-- 
 \  /   Charles Hannum, mycroft@ai.mit.edu
 /\ \   PGP public key available on request.  MIME, AMS, NextMail accepted.
Scheme  White heterosexual atheist male (WHAM) pride!
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: adrian@rachel.ibmpcug.co.uk (Adrian Hall)
Subject: Re: New stuff on rachel.ibmpcug.co.uk
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 09:44:20 GMT

andreas@knobel.GUN.de (Andreas Klemm) writes:
> In <Bzq7op.6LG@ibmpcug.co.uk> adrian@rachel.ibmpcug.co.uk (Adrian Hall) writes:
> |New items on rachel.ibmpcug.co.uk (All are as running on rachel at the
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> What _new_ items ? Did I miss something or could you explain
> more precise what's new ?
> 

 meant new items available for anon. ftp. that are not available for
anon. ftp. elsewhere that I have put together.

Adrian
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adrian Hall				Telephone: +44 (0)81 863 1191
Connect Systems Manager			Fax:	   +44 (0)81 863 6095
The IBM PC User Group			Internet:  adrian@ibmpcug.co.uk
From: msmith@beta.tricity.wsu.edu (Dragon Lord)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: [386BSD] /dev/lp missing
Date: 25 Dec 92 07:00:38 GMT
Article-I.D.: serval.1992Dec25.070038.13852
Organization: Washington State University Tri-Cities, Richland

I've just installed 386BSD on a 486/33 with the ETEQ chipset and a 80
meg IDE drive (will be upgraded to 200 in 1.5 months).  For some reason,
/dev/lp does not install when the system is installed.  Is there any way
for me to manually do it?  I've tried mknod to get the correct file, but
it just dumps the the screen instead of lpt1:

Thanks.

Mark
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: alm@netcom.com (Andrew Moore)
Subject: Re: Problems with LP and SLIP
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 04:09:45 GMT

In article <1hli1tINNlcn@agate.berkeley.edu> usp@jif.berkeley.edu (USP Network) writes:
[lpt driver]
>use interrupts. This new one works fine (thanks to Andy Valencia) but
>seems to be very slow. The speed I get from DOS (arghh :-) ) or
>Interactive Unix is 6 or 7 times faster. That  means that when I have to
>print a large document, it pays to reboot DOS only to do the printing
>and then come back to BSD. Any idea what is wrong ??

I print ghostscript files to a 24 wire printer using the interruptless
printer driver with no speed problems.  What you describes sounds
similar to problems I had printing TeX data using a 9 wire driver.  The
problem was the TeX driver, not the lpt driver.   You might try
ghostscript at different resolutions and see if that makes a
difference.  You are using gs252?
-Andrew Moore <alm@netcom.com>
From: gchamber@nfsun.UUCP (Glenn Chambers)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: IBM--What does it mean? (was: Reading joystick)
Date: 22 Dec 92 13:36:15 GMT
Reply-To: gchamber@nfsun.UUCP (Glenn Chambers)
Organization: Intelligent Technology Group, Pittsburgh, PA

In article <michaelv.724971348@tbird.cc.iastate.edu> michaelv@iastate.edu (Michael L. VanLoon) writes:
>In <1247@galileo.rtn.ca.boeing.com> dmp3592@galileo.rtn.ca.boeing.com (Dean M. Phillips) writes:
>
>>IBM: Incompatible Brain-damaged Machinery  ;-)
>
>IBM: Inferior But Marketable
>IBM: Industry's Biggest Mistake
>
>Any others? :)

IBM: I've Been Moved
IBM: International Brotherhood of Magicians
    (an actual organization)
IBM: Itty Bitty Machine company
    (an actual, probably defunct, computer store on the left coast)

---
Glenn Chambers                       gchamber@vertex-software.com
Vertex Software                      ...!uunet!vertex-software.com!gchamber
Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Using compressed man pages?
Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 16:09:15 GMT

In article <C076un.Fro@ns1.nodak.edu> tjon@plains.NoDak.edu (Christopher C. Tjon) writes:
:
:I know that about a month ago someone did a zman or something like that
:to allow man pages to reside on the system compressed and be retreived.
:Can anyone tell me where to find this program.

rachel.ibmpcug.co.uk:/usr/local/src/man

G
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: explorer@iastate.edu (Michael Graff)
Subject: [386bsd]  Has anyone written ARCnet drivers?
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 02:27:56 GMT

I have these neat ARCnet cards at home, and I figure it would be a great
way to set up a cheap network.  Has anyone written drivers for ARCnet?
All that seems necessary is to look into KA9Q or something and see how
they fake it.  *smile*

Merry Christmas,
--Michael


-- 
--
Michael Graff    Iowa State University Computation Center      Project Vincent
215 Durham                voice: (515) 294-4994           explorer@iastate.edu
Ames, IA  50010           fax:   (515) 294-1717           gg.mlg@isumvs.bitnet
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
From: banz@umbc7.umbc.edu (Robert Banz)
Subject: [386BSD] LPT port ???
Keywords: Printer, LPT
Organization: University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:06:54 GMT


I've been running 386BSD for a few weeks now, and the one thing I haven't
been able to use is my parallel port!  How does one go about setting up to
print through the lpt port with 386BSD.

I feel that there is a real simple answer to this one, and I kind of
feel stupid asking...

Please respond by email, I haven't been keeping up on my newsgroups lately...

Rob Banz
banz@umbc3.umbc.edu
From: vince@jsrvx1.ucsf.edu
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Infinite Reboots with more info.
Date: 22 Dec 92 19:12:15 GMT
Organization: University of California San Francisco

I didn't give enough info in the first post because I'd seen the same problem
so many times, but with answers posted that I just sort of assumed everyone 
knew what I meant. Bad assumption on my part. Anyway, hopefully some kind soul
can help me now that I have a bit more to go on.


I tried installing 0.1.44(the latest dist.fs kernel I could find) on the 160MB 
of unpartitioned free space on a 320MB ESDI drive with a 160MB DOS partition.

The machine is an Everex 20Mhz 386 with 8MB and bios dated 12/25/88.

After running the install program with no trouble, I hit return to reboot, and
after identifying the peripherals (just monitor, floppies two serial ports,
and hard drive) the machine says something about a kernel panic and dumping
ram (happens way too fast to catchg it all) and then reboots. This will
continue ad infinitum.

Can anyone help? I'll summarize and post any replies.

Thanks in advance.
Vince Reed
vince@jsrvx1.ucsf.edu
From: andrew@werple.apana.org.au (Andrew Herbert)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: syslog() library function bug - FIX
Date: 28 Dec 1992 23:43:58 +1100
Organization: werple public-access unix, Melbourne
NNTP-Posting-Host: werple.apana.org.au

The syslog library function in 386BSD has a bug that prevents logging to the
authpriv and cron facilities by /usr/bin/login and crond (if you've enabled
this) respectively.  No doubt other combinations of facility and priority were
also affected.

enjoy,
Andrew

*** /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/syslog.c.unhacked	Thu Jun 27 11:53:08 1991
--- /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/syslog.c	Mon Dec 28 23:37:36 1992
***************
*** 99,105 ****
  
  	/* check for invalid bits or no priority set */
  	if (!LOG_PRI(pri) || (pri &~ (LOG_PRIMASK|LOG_FACMASK)) ||
! 	    !(LOG_MASK(pri) & LogMask))
  		return;
  
  	saved_errno = errno;
--- 99,105 ----
  
  	/* check for invalid bits or no priority set */
  	if (!LOG_PRI(pri) || (pri &~ (LOG_PRIMASK|LOG_FACMASK)) ||
! 	    !(LOG_MASK(LOG_PRI(pri)) & LogMask))
  		return;
  
  	saved_errno = errno;
From: nick@chsra2.chsra.wisc.edu (nick shanny)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: test
Date: 28 Dec 92 20:40:55 GMT
Reply-To: nick%chsra1.decnet@macc.wisc.edu
Organization: CHSRA/UW-MADISON, MADISON, WI

This is a test. Please ignore.
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd