HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: steph@m.cs.uiuc.edu (Dale Stephenson)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Truth in Scalping
Date: 16 Oct 92 22:27:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: m.1992Oct16.222715.25782
Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL

Students offer world series tickets as bribes?  Wow.

When I get my doctrate, I want to work for Georgia Tech!
:->

-- 
Dale J. Stephenson |*| (steph@cs.uiuc.edu) |*| Gigabit Study Group 

  "It is considered good to look wise, especially when not
From: steinman@me.utoronto.ca (David Steinman)
Subject: Re: The origin of the _World_ Series
Keywords: history world series trivia newspaper
Organization: UofT Mechanical Engineering
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 02:08:35 GMT

mm42@prism.gatech.EDU (Mark Mitchell) writes:

>It is a little obnoxious to call the NBA, NFL, and MLB champions
>"World Champions", but keep in mind that even though the franchises
>are not located throughout the world the players *do* represent, for
>the most part, the best from throughout the world.  MLB is filled
>with Dominican, Mexican, Canadian, and other non-US players.  Similarly
>the NBA has a number of European players.  The NFL even has a few 
>non-US placekickers, if not position players.  The leagues are open
>to anyone in the world who can make the cut, and are generally recognized
>as by far the best in the world at what they do.

I've been following this thread for a few days (and probably missed its
genesis), but has anyone answered the question?  According to the Toronto
Star today, the _World_ Series came about because a newspaper called "The
World" originally provided the trophy to the series winner.  
--
Dave!
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Braves win 5-1
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 15:39:02 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.134553.9549@menudo.uh.edu> chee1l5@jetson.uh.edu (Sam Lane) writes:
>The Braves take game 1 of the NLCS over the Pirates, 5-1.
>Smoltz had a no hitter through 4 2/3, and ended up going 8 for the win.
>The shutout (and a record 29 inning scroreless streak by the Pirates) was broken up with 
>a solo shot by *Jose Lind*. His first of the year.
>
>Obligatory fuel: Bonds gobbled up three more outs (0 for 3).

Further flame fuel: I would be somewhat surprised if the braves dont win this
one in 4. I would be SHOCKED if it goes to 6. The pirates just seem outta
luck on this one. FLAMEBAIT FLAMEBAIT FLAMEBAIT

r


Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: maceache@fox.nstn.ns.ca (Tim Maceachern)
Subject: Re: jays starters for lcs
Organization: NSTN Network Operations Centre, Nova Scotia, Canada
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 16:52:42 GMT

ko@teecs.UUCP (Sam Ko) writes:

>I'll say the Jays will take it in 6 games and go all the way to 
>the World Series. They have the strongest pitching staff in the
>League and if they put them all together, it is almost unbeatable.
>Six months hard work finally paid off and they really deserved to
>be there. Best of luck, Jays and all the way to the World Series.

>             ____________________________
>~~~~~~~~~~~~ |     Go   J A Y S   Go    | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>             ----------------------------

Yeah, Toronto has the best 3-man rotation available for the playoffs/series.
Unfortunately they're not going to use Cone/Guzman/Key.  Best to hope that
Cone and Guzman can go 3-1 and Morris can manage 1-2.

Tim MacEachern
From: kbos@carina.unm.edu (Kurt "Some Guy" Bose)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: ALCS game 5: Why a day game?
Date: 13 Oct 92 07:42:26 GMT
Distribution: world,local
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In article <1992Oct12.235013.1@violet.ccit.arizona.edu> f67700241@violet.ccit.arizona.edu (Greg Franklin) writes:
>In article <ldk185INNjeq@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM>, empcomm@empserv.Corp.Sun.COM (Chet Anderson - Emp. Services) writes:
>> I just heard that the A's beat the Jays today--why did they play
>> a day game?  I thought I was going to get to watch it tonight on
>> TV, but noooooo...
>> 
>> Don't tell me they were afraid to go up against Monday Night Football;
>> even then the ratings would have to be better than during the day.
>
>Yes, they were afraid to go up against MNF.  There are fans out there who
>like baseball AND football, you know.

It's also possible that because of TV scheduling, there were 3 possibilities:

1) Have a night game, and lose the East Coast.
2) Have a twilight game (4:30 or 5 PM) and have nasty shadows.
3) Have a day game and upset people who haven't been listening. :)

With the game on Columbus Day, lots of people are off work, so crowds wouldn't
be THAT depleted.  Also, if I remember correctly, Monday is the best night of
the week for CBS programming. (Naah, no cynicism here...)

Besides, the football game wasn't exactly _close_...:)
(Of course, neither was the baseball game...:) )

-- 
Kurt Bose (as in Daisy, not Rose) * kbos@carina.unm.edu * Make outs, not walks!
Keeper of the R.S.BB FAQ, and Junior Stathead {tm} * Maintainer, R.S.BB Archive
Be kind. Don't flame the mediots. * Look, stupid comments are funny!'-R. Lustig
I'd rather see Doug Dascenzo pitch than suffer through John Burkett's batting..
From: sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan )
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: A true classic
Date: 15 Oct 92 16:58:30 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network


Last night's Pirate/Braves G-7 was a true classic. I couldn't
help feeling sorry for Leyland as the Braves snathched a
well deserved victory from him and Drabek.......

But, his post game comments was a class act.

I feel that as in life, so also in Baseball. What goes around
comes around. If a line drive becomes a double-play once, it
can become extra bases the other time.

And Leyland, who IMO is a great manager will see better days
in future. Of this, there is no doubt.

But at the same time I tip my hat to the Braves for never
giving up. The braves should feel lucky, not proud after
this win.

S.H
Forever Twins
From: thornley@deci.cs.umn.edu (David H. Thornley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Cito Manages reasonable in Game #1
Date: 8 Oct 92 22:05:59 GMT
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept.

In article <21067@plains.NoDak.edu> sivaram@plains.NoDak.edu (Sivaram Hariharan ) writes:
>
>I agree that Cito threw away yesterday's game to the As.
>Why Morris in the 9th when u have fire-ballers like Ward.
>Why Morris when Larussa shows by example that he removes
>Stewart and brings in Russel.
>
In the defense of Cito, why expect him to face down Morris when Kelly left
him in through the tenth in a more critical game?  Morris does *not* want
to leave the game, he wants to continue to pitch, and I can respect that
in a guy.  He seems to intimidate managers into leaving him in too long,
which is a problem, but players with determination are never going to
be easy to manage.

David Thornley
"You must never allow a pitcher to undermine your authority" - Niccolo
Machiavelli
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: joel@math.toronto.edu (Joel Chan)
Subject: Re: barrywatch
Organization: Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 22:59:40 GMT

In article <92280.195234RVESTERM@vma.cc.nd.edu> <RVESTERM@vma.cc.nd.edu> writes:
>swing and a miss, no balls, one strike
>swing and a miss, no balls, two strike
>swing and a miss, strikeout
>
>0-1, 1 strikeout

If you watched game 2 of the NLCS, someone in the Atlanta crowd
had the Barry-o-meter.  0-fer-his-last 5 and then he singled and scored and
a time when the game was already over.

-- 
Joel Chan, University of Toronto                   joel@math.toronto.edu
Mathematical Association of America Student Chapter
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: roberts@leland.Stanford.EDU (John Jacob Roberts)
Subject: Re: Sal, the barber, Maglie
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 92 03:30:26 GMT

In article <1992Oct17.020425.14962@netcom.com> royg@netcom.com (Roy H. Gordon) writes:
>Like all *Brooklyn* Dodger fans, he is thoroughly mentally confused. (I
>realize I'm being incredibly kind here.)  But can someone please help me
>out by posting (or emailing) the dates Maglie played for the Dodgers and
>his regular season and WS record.  

It doesn't look like Maglie was traded from the GIANTS to the Dodgers, but
he did play for both.  His career line (as far as teams go):

1945,1950-55:  NY Giants
Traded to Cleveland, midseason 1955
1955,56:  Cleveland Indians
Traded to Brooklyn, early in the 1956 season
1957,58:  Brooklyn Dodgers
Traded to Yankees, midseason 1957
1957,58:  NY Yankees
Traded to Cardinals, midseason 1958 (isn't this getting a little old, Sal?)
1958:  St. Louis Cardinals
Retired.

His Dodger totals:

W   L   G  IP  H   BB  SO  ERA
19  11  47 292 248 78  158 2.89     (Not bad!)

Postseason (again, Dodgers only):

Started two games in the 1956 WS vs. the Yankees (which NY won, 4-3).

First game:  Complete game victory, gave up three runs, nine hits.
Fifth game:  Complete game loss (perfect game by Larsen), gave up two runs, 
	     five hits.
Totals:  17 IP, 5 ER, 6 BB, 15 K, 2.65 ERA. 

Even though he started the first game, Newcombe (27-7, 3.08 ERA in '56) was 
the ace of the staff, and probably started late in the year.  Maglie, 
although he retired two years later, was obviously still very effective.

>Didn't he also throw a no hitter when
>he was with them?
>

Sure did, against the Phillies on 9/25/56.

By the way, Maglie finished his career with a record of 119-62, a 3.15
ERA, and about 4.5 K/9 IP.  Why didn't he win more?  His first full year
in the majors was 1950 (note that he spent some time in the majors in
1945), when he was 33 years old.  He pitched until he was 41.  Does 
anyone know why he got such a late start?

--Jake
From: rstimets@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (robert and stimets)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: The Superlatives of the NL
Date: 8 Oct 92 20:05:46 GMT
Organization: Indiana University

In article <1992Oct7.004220.12498@cs.wayne.edu> dfl@math.wayne.edu (David Frohardt-Lane) writes:
>In article <6877@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> jrmst8+@pitt.edu (Joseph R Mcdonald) writes:
>>In article <ahn-041092012617@branford-college-node.net.yale.edu> ahn@pop.cis.yale.edu (Eugene R. Ahn) writes:
>>>Most disappointing pitcher: Andy Benes
>>
>>Dwight Gooden.
>
>Only if you look at W-L.  His ERA is almost the same as last year's.
>
>>>MVP: Terry Pendleton (the core of the Atlanta Braves each day)
>>
>>Bonds was as much Pittsburgh's core as Pendleton was Atlanta's.  And Bonds
>>put up better numbers.
>>
>>>Best hitter: Gary Sheffield (great in the clutch, superior power, average,
>>>RBI)
>>
>>Sheffield and Bonds.  Tie.
>
>If Sheffield is as good a hitter as Bonds, then why isn't he the MVP?
>He plays a more difficult defensive position.  Don't tell me it's
>because he doesn't play for a contender.
>
>Note: I'm not saying Sheffield *is* as good a hitter as Bonds.  He's
>not.
>
>>>Best leadoff hitter: Bip Roberts
>>Otis Nixon and Brett Butler.
>
>Butler is probably on the same level as Roberts, but Nixon is far
>behind.  The most important stat, by far, for a leadoff hitter is OBP.
>Roberts had an OBP of .396, Nixon had .353.  Roberts also outslugged
>Nixon by > 50 points.
>
If OBP is the sigle most important stat, then stolen bases is the second
most important stat.  In this case: Roberts over Nixon and Butler (fewer
CS's also, by the way).  Admittedly, the difference is small, however,
I see no comparison when one takes into account doubles: Roberts 34, Nixon 14,
Butler 14.  Roberts outslugged Butler by 41 points, Nixon by 86.
He therefore (not surprisingly) outscored Brett and Otis by 6 and 12 runs, 
respectively.
And why ignore the 14 points in BA that Roberts has over Butler? (30 points over
Nixon!!)

>Barry Bonds would have been the best batting leadoff this year, but only
>counting players who did bat leadoff, call it a tie between Roberts and
>Butler.
>
No way, sorry.  As someone else previously posted, Butler has been a pretty
damn selfish player.  Sure, he bunts for base-hits often enough, but his 
team was so far behind so often that many of these came in positions that 
only Butler's stats were boosted.
>
RStimets
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: tconnors@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Tim Connors )
Subject: Pittsburg Fans
Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 02:47:05 GMT

  I think the key to the high turnout of Pittsburgh fans is merely a
reflection of the great Pittsburgh teams. The pens are the hockey
champs, any hockey fan would like to see them play, the Pirates are the
NL east champs, any fan in the area woulf enjoy them. Now if the
Penguins and Pirates were in their respective basements, do you think
the fans would turn out in drove? I don't.
     tconnors@morgan.ucs.mun.ca
          Tim Connors

Jays #1
Kings #1
Lions #1

Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: paula@koufax.cv.hp.com (Paul Andresen)
Subject: The Ex-Cub Factor
Organization: Our Lady Of The Stand-Up Triple
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 14:18:07 GMT

So far, everyone has been ignoring THE most important factor in determining
the playoff winners. It is an old, and nearly infallable predictor that the
team with the most ex-Cubs will lose in the post season. With that in mind,
here goes:

      Atlanta            Pittsburgh        Toronto      Oakland
      -------            ----------        -------      -------
      Damon Berryhill    Lloyd McClendon   Joe Carter   Dennis Eckersley
                         Gary Varsho       Pat Tabler 
                         Danny Jackson

Viewing the results to date (Atlanta 2-0, Oakland 1-0) the predictor is
lookin' pretty good.

Now when it comes down to the World Series, it looks to be a toss-up. 
Berryhill played five years with the Cubs as opposed to the Eck's three,
but I don't know if that is a legit tie-breaker.

Anyone know where this thing started? It's been around for a while. I'm
tempted to say that Mike Royko started it, but I'm not certain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              If you're really hip, the passing years will show.
                                           ......Tower Of Power

  paula@koufax.cv.hp.com   Paul Andresen  Hewlett-Packard  (503)-750-3511

    home: 3006 NW McKinley    Corvallis, OR 97330       (503)-752-8424
                            A SABR member since 1979
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: (Gerry Gryschuk)
Subject: Re: eck chokes again!
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 14:02:10 GMT

From article <1992Oct12.213746.22360@sj.ate.slb.com>, by leseberg@sj.ate.slb.com (Ralph Leseberg):
> I wonder why it is ok for a batter to hop down the first base line with 
> his arms waving in triumph after hitting a home run but when a pitcher 
> reacts to a strikeout he is called a jerk?

Well it wasn't that the Eck just reacted to the strikeout, he stairred
down the bench as if to say "there, your done". If Robbie had run around
the base paths pointing at the Eck I personnally would have been an
embarrased Jays fan. Similarly if the Eck had just left it at pumping
his arm and walking into the dug out I wouldn't have felt like he had
done anything wrong. Well that's how I see these things.
> 
> In reaction to the ALCS series, these have to be some of the most exciting
> baseball games that I have seen. 

Absolutely great ball.
--
Gerald Gryschuk            Saskatoon,Saskatchewan = a place with 9 months
gerry@sask.usask.ca           of hockey and 3 months of poor skating.
Go Habs!!!		             (Maldonado is a bum.)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: sgs@stein.u.washington.edu (Steven Smith)
Subject: Birthdays
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:37:10 GMT

Baseball Birthdays

October 12
Joe Cronin, 1906 (HOF)
Rick Ferrell, 1905 (HOF)
Oscar Charleston, 1896 (HOF)
Tony Kubek, 1936
Glenn Beckert, 1940
Sid Fernandez, 1962
Garth Iorg, 1954
Luis Polonia, 1964

Also: Your faithful birthday correspondent,
      Yours truly, 1963

October 13
Eddie Mathews, 1931 (HOF)
Rube Waddell, 1876
Eddie "Walking Man" Yost, 1926
Bob Bailey, 1942
George Frazier, 1954
Randy Moffitt, 1948
Frankie Hayes, 1914
Bill Donovan, 1876
Charlie Silvera, 1924
Chris Gwynn, 1964
Luciean Clinton, 1937

--Steve
-- 
 sgs@u.washington.edu             * 
 Steve Smith                      * "We want a pitcher, not a belly itcher." 
 University of Washington HR-20   *    			-- Bill Plummer
 Seattle, WA 98195                *
From: atchison@violin.cis.ohio-state.edu (Mark Atchison)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: Top of 9 may have been it
Date: 15 Oct 92 12:15:07 GMT
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer and Info. Science

In article <1992Oct15.093308.1@kean.ucs.mun.ca> pmorris@kean.ucs.mun.ca writes:
>It certainly was one of the most exciting games I have ever seen. Most 
>previous posters have commented on the dramatics of the bottom of the
>ninth, but we shouldn't ignore what transpired in the top of the inning.
>
>The Bucs had a chance to pad the lead. It's a single to the outfield
>and the 3-b coach send Orlando Merced from second to try to score.
>Bam -- Dave Justice guns down Merced.  Why? Because of Justice's arm, but
>moreso because of Berryhill's positioning. If Lavalliere had positioned 
>himself to block the plate in the bottom of the ninth, Bream is out and
>we're into extra innings.

Probably Spanky thought it would be nice to catch the ball first.  Blocking
the plate is somewhat less effective if the ball shoots into the 1st base
dugout.

-- 
_______________________________________________________________________________
 Mark Atchison, a.k.a. <atchison@cis.ohio-state.edu>; Graduate Student in the
Computer Science Dept, THE Ohio State University (NOT an Ohio State University)
		Any plagiarisms seen above are not my own...
From: rickc@wrigley.corp.sgi.com (Richard Casares)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: baseball trivia
Date: 15 Oct 92 19:42:24 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

In article <1992Oct15.183153.786@ncar.ucar.edu>,
baseball@catch-the-fever.scd.ucar.edu (Gregg Walters) writes:
|> Gregg
|> 
|> (Waffling over whether to abandon the Cubs after 33 years of
|> loyalty, for the Rockies, who are breaking ground for their
|> new stadium just 10 miles from my house)

This might not be a bad move.
I'd bet even money that Rockies win a championship first.

-- 
+===================================================================+
| Rick Casares			            Silicon Graphics        |	
| cubfan@wrigley.corp.sgi.com		    2011 N. Shoreline Blvd  |
| "Just wait till next year."               Mountain View, CA 94039 |
+===================================================================+
From: rickc@wrigley.corp.sgi.com (Richard Casares)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
Subject: Re: How do I love Gruber, let me count the ways!
Keywords: Gruber, game #2
Date: 9 Oct 92 17:25:21 GMT
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.

In article <1992Oct9.050129.11061@ramsey.cs.laurentian.ca>,
bazz@ramsey.cs.laurentian.ca (Denis R. Bazinet) writes:
|> simply being on the roster for the ALCS.  Gruber had a few freak
|> accidents and
|> did not recover easily.  So, people, like the A's, wrote him off at the
|> plate.
|> Well, game two should keep those people quiet for a while!


Some people like Cito Gaston wrote him off as well.
Looks like he's been in the bottom of the order.


-- 
+===================================================================+
| Rick Casares			            Silicon Graphics        |	
| cubfan@wrigley.corp.sgi.com		    2011 N. Shoreline Blvd  |
| "Just wait till next year."               Mountain View, CA 94039 |
+===================================================================+
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: baseball@catch-the-fever.scd.ucar.edu (Gregg Walters)
Subject: Re: Who's winning game #6 - ALCS
Organization: Scientific Computing Divison/NCAR Boulder, CO
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 21:18:58 GMT

Bottom 1st
    Joe Carter had a 2 run homer.
    Jays 2, As 0

Top 3rd
    Guzman strikes out the side.

Bottom 3rd
    Maldonado followed Olerud's run-scoring ground rule double with
a 3-run homer.  LaRussa brings in Parret (sorry about spelling if
its wrong), and got the next batter for the 3rd out.
    Jays 6, As 0

Top 4th
    Guzman throws just 5 pitches to retire the As in order.  As don't
have a hit yet.

Top 5th
    Steinbach and Wilson get back to back singles for the As first hits.
Guzman gets the next batter to popout, then strikes out Blankenship.
R. Henderson looks at strike 3.  Fans erupt.

Bottom 5th
    Jays threatening again.  Maldonado's single puts runners at 1st
and 2nd, nobody out.  Gruber lays down a bunt toward 3rd for a SAC.
Borders, who's 2 for 2, hits a SAC fly to score another run.  LaRussa
has his bullpen busy again.  Lee grounds out to short.
    As   0  2 0
    Jays 7 11 0

Top 5th
    McGuire singles home Sierra from 3rd, breaking the shutdown.  Guzman
gets Steinbach looking for the 2nd out.  WP lets runners move up to 2nd
& 3rd.  Wilson goes down swinging.
    Jays 7, As 1

If you can't get to a TV, CBS radio affiliates have it - here in Denver
that's KYBG 1090AM.

Gregg
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: ecaxron@ariel.lerc.nasa.gov (Ron Graham)
Subject: Re: Leyland may have made a BIG mistake...
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Date: 15 Oct 1992 10:16 EST  

In article <1992Oct15.005952.22806@cs.ucla.edu>, cheese@oahu.cs.ucla.edu 
     (Charles Alpert) writes...

>I am not a frequent poster to this newsgroup, but I did post an
>article like this a few months ago.  The Cubs were playing a double
>header and Maddux started the opener.  The Cubs jumped out to a 7-0
>lead in the top of the first and Maddux went on to pitch a complete
>game shutout.  I argued that Maddux should not have even thrown a
>pitch in the first game (although I found out rules state he has to
>completely face one batter).  The first game was already in the bag so
>you could pitch some mediocre starter instead and save Maddux for the
>nightcap.  

Here's a guess as to why managers are not doing this regularly: if
Maddux is announced as your starting pitcher, and is on that lineup
card, then he's in the game even if he's not thrown a pitch.  So if
you take him out, not having thrown a pitch, and replace him with, say,
Boskie, then you're short a player.

Now, we all know that managers are not superstitious in the least ;-).
But my guess is that a lot of these guys are uncomfortable with starting
a game one roster spot short, even if they're drilling the other team
after the first inning.  After all, a disaster could happen.

But I also guess the chance of that kind of disaster (the other team
coming back from 7-0 down after one inning and Maddux removed) actually
happening is small.  I agree with you - I'd do it.

RG

"I'm the luckiest guy in Callahooga County."  -  Dennis Cook
Newsgroups: rec.sport.baseball
From: tedward@cs.cornell.edu (Edward [Ted] Fischer)
Subject: Re: jays starters for lcs
Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept, Ithaca NY 14853
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 18:11:05 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.165242.552@nstn.ns.ca> maceache@fox.nstn.ns.ca (Tim Maceachern) writes:
>
>Yeah, Toronto has the best 3-man rotation available for the playoffs/series.
>Unfortunately they're not going to use Cone/Guzman/Key.  Best to hope that
>Cone and Guzman can go 3-1 and Morris can manage 1-2.

Don't be so hard on Morris.
If the Jays score six runs for him, he'll win 3/4 of the time.

Cheers,
-Valentine
(Prediction for tonight: Cone gets tromped by walks, stolen
bases, and a three-run dinger by Rickey Henderson.)
-- 
Make outs, not walks!					tedward@cs.cornell.edu
Clemens four Cy Young!