HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: swaliff@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Steve Aliff)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Zoom command mode/data mode transition -- how?
Summary: How do you escape to command mode and return -- especially return.
Date: 16 Aug 92 20:40:28 GMT
Organization: The Great Beyond

With the (internal) Zoom FAX modem VFP V.32bis, what settings are
necessary to escape to command mode, issue a command, and go back
online without dropping the connection? For example, I'd like to do
something like the following:

(unix)% 
+++
at%l
003
OK
ato
(unix)%  <== Alas, I never get back here

But I can never get back to my terminal connection after escaping out.
Here's my current active profile:

ACTIVE PROFILE:
B1 E1 L2 M1 N0 Q0 T V1 W1 X4 Y0 &C1 &D2 &G0 &J0 &K3 &Q5 &R0 &S0 &T4 &X0 &Y0
S00:000 S01:000 S02:043 S03:013 S04:010 S05:008 S06:002 S07:050 S08:002 S09:006
S10:014 S11:050 S12:050 S18:000 S25:005 S26:001 S36:007 S37:011 S38:020 S44:003
S46:138 S48:007 S49:008 S50:255 
-- 
Steve Aliff (swaliff@afterlife.ncsc.mil [144.51.1.1])
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: work@tasha.guug.de (Felix Blank)
Subject: ZyXEL ROM 408a to 412c changes
Summary: Changed behavior in fax receive mode of ZyXEL
Keywords: ZyXEL FAX CLASS2
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 23:35:27 GMT

I have written some code, which flawless received fax messages with a
ZyXEL ROM 408a using class 2 fax mode. Then i upgraded to ROM 412c,
because i couldn't succeed in sending fax messages and hoped to correct
this situation. And now neither of both works!
What i actually are doing is to give a AT+FDR followed by XON and DC2
characters. This worked fine under ROM 408a, but now i get the expected
"CONNECT" messages and nothing more happens until my time limit of
2 minutes strikes.
Does anybody know, what ZyXEL has changed between the two ROM releases?
I have the release notes of their BBS, but they are of no help.

Felix
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Felix Blank                                 Internet   : felix@tasha.guug.de
Germany, Munich                             CompuServe : 76334,3373
Fax: +49-89-8206074
From: fins@radgumbo.Corp.Sun.COM (Richard Schiavi)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: UNIX based Tone Recognition System?
Date: 20 Aug 92 21:26:35 GMT
Reply-To: fins@radgumbo.Corp.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NNTP-Posting-Host: radgumbo.corp.sun.com


I would like to hear about any products or boards that implement 
a menu based front end system that works via tones entered from 
a phone call. Basically, one in which someone calls, gets a greeting
and some options, works through the menu by entering digits on
their phone to select certain data.  

Is this handled usually via computer hardware, or does the phone
companies usually set up these types of services? I have seen many
PC based solutions, but would prefer a UNIX or a product API for
a serial port board.

Thanks for any info,


---
Rich Schiavi
fins@radgumbo.Corp.Sun.COM
From: gaarder@theory.TC.Cornell.EDU (Steve Gaarder)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
Subject: Re: WB hangs occasionally
Date: 18 Aug 92 20:17:59 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: AC Technology

In article <1992Aug15.083454.13840@wrangler.WLK.COM> bill@ssbn.wlk.com (Bill Kennedy) writes:
>In article <scs.713738821@hela.iti.org> scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons) writes:
>[ modem wanders off into the weeds ... ]
>>in, the modem never answers.  From the host side you can tip to it, but
>>it does not respond to AT commands or dials.  The only thing that clears
>>things is a power cycle.
>
>Mine does it too and worse with the firmware upgrade.  What I do is defeat
>the A/B switch (S255=0) and then cycle the A/B switch to get it back. >-- 

I haven't seen *that* problem - perhaps it's because I have the modem
set up to reset every time DTR is dropped (AT&D3).  If your system drops
DTR when a connection ends you might want to try it.



-- 
Steven Gaarder                              Network & Systems Adminstrator
gaarder@tc.cornell.edu                     AC Technology, Ithaca, N.Y. USA
From: mo@sdf.lonestar.org (Mohit Goyal)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Companies that have modems upgradeable to V.FAST
Date: 20 Aug 92 06:42:34 GMT
Organization: sdf Public Access UNIX, Dallas--unrestricted free shell access

Hello.  I have read on this echo that USR, ZyXEL, and Hayes all have stated
that they have modems that will be upgradeable to V.fast.

USR - Current "v.small" Courier v32bis and DS modems

ZyXEL - soon to be released E+ modem

Hayes - ?????


Which Hayes modems will be upgradeable to v.fast?  The new Optima 14.4k
faxmodem?
Also, has Hayes stated what kind of upgrade it will be?

USR has said it will be a hardware upgrade that can be done at home and
will retail for $299.
ZyXEL has stated that it will be a ROM upgrade.  Current ROM upgrades
are less than $50.

Thank you.
From: br@cs.cmu.edu (Bill Ross)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Flow control - Help!
Date: 14 Aug 92 18:57:04 GMT
Article-I.D.: cs.BszLz5.DyF.2
Reply-To: br@cs.cmu.edu
Organization: CMU Vision and Autonomous Systems Center


    I'm trying to get hardware flow control working between
    my modem and my Sun IPC without any results.  Here's my
    setup:

	Machine:	Sun IPC, SunOS 4.1.3
	Modem:		USR 14.4 Sportster
	Cable:		Pins 2,3,4,5,7,20 through
	Modem settings:	&h1 = use CTS
			&r2 = use RTS
	Unix tip:	nt = no software flow control
			hf = use hardware flow control

    The CTS & RTS lights are lit, I connect and cat a big
    file and I loose chunks of it.  What am I doing wrong?

    Thanks!
    Bill
    br@cs.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: marke@fsi-ssd.csg.ssd.fsi.com (Mark W. Easter)
Subject: Re: Gateway 2000 Telepath
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:25:40 GMT
Organization: FlightSafety-SSD, Tulsa, OK, USA

In article <1992Aug14.154638.27487@wam.umd.edu> mmeltzer@wam.umd.edu writes:

>   Has anyone actually received their modem yet?  Have you started using it?
>   Can you please tell me about it, and the software it comes with.

I got mine week before last.  It came with Crosstalk, WinFax, and
Qmodem.  All installed ok.  There were some problems juggling IRQs
since I already had a full up system.  I ended up sharing IRQ3 between
COM2, a serial port, and COM3, my telepath.  This has worked fine.  So
far ... no problems.  I've run at 56kbit both normally and over a slip
connection and sent and received faxes.  So far, I'm tickled to death!
Have fun!
-- 
                                                                         
----------------------------------------------------------------    /|  -
Mark W. Easter            FlightSafety International               / | /|
Staff Engineer            Simulation Systems Division         -----------
Computer Systems Group    Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012    Flight   \ |   
marke@fsi.com             918-251-0500 x596                  Safety \|SSD
                   "You wreck 'em - we'll rack 'em"                       
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson)
Subject: Re: Procomm 2.01 strip 8th bit (How TO)
Reply-To: 70465.203@compuserve.com
Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon.
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 22:50:02 GMT

wb8foz@skybridge.SCL.CWRU.Edu (David Lesher) writes:

>Others said
># >For Procomm: set up the "translate table" such that the upper 128 bytes are
># >just like the lower 128 bytes, and turn "translate table _on_".  Then, keep
># >it set to 8-bits/no-parity and you'll be set.


>I've been trying to follow this thread and I admit I'm getting
>confused..

>If you are working over a 7 bit-wide path, and the protocol needs 8,
>what good does it do to play with a translate table?  Can it magically
>guess what the 8th bit [if there WAS one] would be?

No, the path is 8-bits. It's just that some Unix systems will cheerfully
send text to you as 7-E-1 even though you are connected at 8-N-1. Data
transfers at 8-N-1 work fine. You just can't read the #$%%^ screen 
prompts without stripping the 8th bit!

I have to deal with that on the system I'm entering this on. 
-- 
Leonard Erickson		      leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com
CIS: [70465,203]			 70465.203@compuserve.com
FIDO:   1:105/51	 Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
(The CIS & Fido addresses are preferred)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: rick@cs.sunysb.edu (Rick Spanbauer)
Subject: Telebit T2500 question - V.32
Organization: State University of New York, Stony Brook
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 01:28:40 GMT

I have 5 older T2500's with GA2.00 firmware that I would like to get
running under V.32 - the boxes have been used exclusively for PEP
until now.  Try as I might, I cannot get any of the boxes to run
V.32.  I can set s50 such that it is possible to originate at
300/1200/2400/PEP, but no V.32.  Are modems of the GA2.00 ilk known to work
running V.32?  If so, what is the trick necessary to get them
going?

					Thanks - 

				Rick Spanbauer
				SUNY/Stony Brook
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson)
Subject: Re: LAPM vs MNP on good lines - which is best?
Reply-To: 70465.203@compuserve.com
Organization: SCN Research/Qic Laboratories of Tigard, Oregon.
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 23:15:45 GMT

borgen@stud.cs.uit.no (Boerge Noest) writes:


>Which of MNP4 and LAPM has the least overhead when used on good
>connections?
>(Yeah, I'm trying to trim max cps out of the T2500)

The trouble with MNP is when you start using compression. MNP 
compression will cheerfully *expand* data that was already 
compressed. If compression isn't applicable to your situation
then your question is valid. Otherwise....

-- 
Leonard Erickson		      leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com
CIS: [70465,203]			 70465.203@compuserve.com
FIDO:   1:105/51	 Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org
(The CIS & Fido addresses are preferred)
From: wilken@plains.NoDak.edu (Scott Wilken)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: 16550 vs. 16550AFN
Date: 20 Aug 92 21:18:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: plains.19809
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computing Network

In article <BtAt51.JD8@news.cso.uiuc.edu> berger@atropa (Mike Berger) writes:
>eputnam@vax1.umkc.edu writes:
>you use an external modem, then your computer's hardware (your serial
>port) has to be able to handle the data rate.  When you use an
>internal modem, you eliminate that potential bottleneck.  Who cares
>what kind of uart is used on an internal modem (or indeed, that one
>is used at all)?  If the modem can handle the maximum data rate,
>then a different uart chip will make no difference at all.  A modem

Uh, since when does an internal modem not have a UART?  A modem is still
a serial device no matter if it is external or internal...  You need to 
compound the serial bits inside a UART's register in order to form a 
single byte which is then sent out in parallel over the bus.

Telling someone that he doesnt need a 16550 unless he has an external (assuming
he needed one for COM overruns in the first place) is assinine..

Scott
-- 
Go FAST!            |  Internet:  wilken@plains.nodak.edu   |     AMA #587126 
Take Chances!       |     UUCP: ..!uunet!plains!wilken      |     DoD #0087 
VF700F Interceptor  |        Bitnet:  WILKEN@PLAINS         |
From: newton@cs.utexas.edu (Peter Newton)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: How to upgrade Supra ROMs?
Date: 17 Aug 1992 14:02:11 -0500
Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
NNTP-Posting-Host: burr.cs.utexas.edu


I just bought a used Supra with 1.0 ROMs and am hoping that someone
can help me with the upgrade situation.  From what I gather from reading
old c.d.m. articles, the current ROM release is 1.20C, but a major
revision has been hanging fire for a couple months.

How do I get onto the list to receive these new ROMs?  Does Supra
send ROMs for free, or is there a charge?  Also, does anyone have
some hints on how to open the case and replace the ROMs.  I presume
the ROMs are in sockets.

Finally, could someone mention a few of the major problems with the
old ROMs in case I need to give Supra a reason for wanting the
upgrade?  This would save me much debugging time.

Thank you very much.  I ask now because I would like to deal with Supra
from an informed position when I call or FAX them.
-- 
 ----
Peter Newton (newton@cs.utexas.edu)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: liuxu@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Xudong Liu)
Subject: test ignore.
Originator: liuxu@secfs
Organization: Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, Nashville, TN, USA
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 17:00:29 GMT
From: fnox@vax5.cit.cornell.edu (Mark Margolis)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Caller ID and Supra?
Date: 20 Aug 92 13:28:30 EDT
Distribution: comp
Organization: Cornell University

According to Supra, their modems do NOT support Caller ID yet.
Is it true, in fact, that the version 1.2C ROMS actually DO support caller ID?

- Mark

-- 

******************************************************
*                                                    *
*   Mark Margolis     FNOX@VAX5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU      *
*                     FNOX@CRNLVAX5.BITNET           *
*                                                    *
*   Cornell University - Ithaca, New York 14853      *
*                                                    *
******************************************************
From: stu@valinor.mythical.com (Stu Labovitz)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Latest Sysop Prices ?
Keywords: sysop, modem, v.32
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 92 21:07:35 CDT
Distribution: na
Organization: (What? Organized??) - Mythical Computer Systems

A friend of mine is setting up a BBS and is interested in purchasing a
V.32 (or V.32bis) modem under a sysop purchase deal.  If you have any
information about the current sysop offers, please either post them in
comp.dcom.modems or (preferably) mail them to me (and I will post a
summary to the net).  Many, many thanks!

   Stuart L Labovitz                    Internet:  stu@valinor.mythical.com
    (insert standard disclaimer here)       UUCP:   uunet!valinor!stu

   Duct tape is like the force.  It has a light side, a dark side,
      and it holds the universe together.      --- Carl Zwanzig
=============================================================================
From: uyyifrah@mcs.drexel.edu (Y Yifrah [y^2])
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Upgrading the large footprint Courier V.32bis?
Date: 17 Aug 92 17:15:21 GMT
Organization: Drexel University

In article <1992Aug13.204837.5616@mits.mdata.fi> paetau@mits.mdata.fi (Rasmus Paetau) writes:
>
>Can the large footprint version of the Courier HST DS V.32bis be
>upgraded somehow? If not, is it possible to send the modem to US
>Robotics and get a new small footprint version in exchange by paying a
>little bit?
>-- 
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>| Rasmus Paetau (paetau@mits.mdata.fi) | Waiting for the Atari Falcon |
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, they are now offering an "upgrade" for us BIG modem people, but instead
of sending in a "little bit" they want "ALOT!!!"

For my HST DS w/v32bis, they want $299, I do get FAX, 16.8HST and "possible"
upgradability to v.fast (for how much?)

Of course since I got mine on sysop deal, I can get a new one for $449,
but I "can't" sell my old one because of the plate affixed to it saying
"NOT FOR RESALE"

If I didn't, as long as I could get > $150 for a HST DS v32bis modem,
would have come out ahead... Basically,
I'm looking elsewhere and just will have two modems

$300 is way too much for an upgrade for me, maybe for the people who spent
$700 or more on their modems...

<sigh> I talked to Telebit, but they are not too clear on how the fax option
will be worked in, I'm going to wait and see what happens when theirs comes
out.
-- 
                                        Yoram Yifrah -- uyyifrah@mcs.drexel.edu

"I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!"
                                               -- Howard Beal, UBS Network News
From: uyyifrah@mcs.drexel.edu (Y Yifrah [y^2])
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Latest Sysop Prices ?
Date: 19 Aug 92 18:08:53 GMT
Organization: Drexel University

In article <jwaleke.04sp@tcedge.mi.org> jwaleke@tcedge.mi.org (Jim Waleke) writes:
>Boardwatch Magazine has the latest SysOp prices on a lot of Modems.  You 
>should check them out...
>
>USR's Dual Standard 16.8k with Fax is 449.
>
>Supra's 14.4k with 14.4k fax is 249.
>
>Both Sysop Deals.

I checked with Telebit Aug. 14th... the WorldBlazer was $429 (w/o fax) they
were not specific on what would happen when the fax option became available
in the next quarter... Also, they were very specific to call it BBS Operator
as opposed to sysop... I dunno why...

-- 
                                        Yoram Yifrah -- uyyifrah@mcs.drexel.edu

"I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!"
                                               -- Howard Beal, UBS Network News
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
From: ptrei@bistromath.mitre.org (Peter Trei)
Subject: DID YOU ORDER FROM BFJ?? (was: Re: BFJ Enterprises / Supra)
Keywords: Supra - BFJ
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 17:07:22 GMT

In article <1992Aug18.161041.17209@iitmax.iit.edu> vonb@iitmax.iit.edu (Robert
 Von Borstel) writes:
>We've had a Supra modem on backorder for eons and I thought it was
>going to ship last week from BFJ, however still no modem.  Trying
>to call their 800# (1-800-932-4712) it just keeps ringing.
>
>Calling, 411 and getting their direct number (404-998-8251) the
>same thing happens.  Having been gone a week, did I miss something
>about BFJs?
>-- 
>Robert Von Borstel                . Internet:vonb@iitmax.iit.edu
>Illinois Institute of Technology  . NeXTmail:vonb@fred.iit.edu  
>Academic Computing Center           (312) 567 5962
>10 West 31St Street   Chicago, Ill  60616

     Ditto. This deserves close watching. I ordered from them back at
the end of March, and was told last week that I was now #6 in the
queue.

     It would be interesting to hear from other people awaiting modems
from BFJ. They *did* mail modems to at least some people (who was
last?). Anything is possible - they may have had a fire - they may all
take vacation in mid-August.

     They may also have gone out of business and/or skipped town. If
that's the case, stiffed customers such as ourselves should keep in
touch, so we can present a united front at any bankruptcy hearings
and/or lawsuits which arise.
						Peter Trei
						ptrei@Mitre.org

PS: Can anyone near them drive over and take a look?

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
From: schneck@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Bernhard Schneck)
Subject: Re: ZyXEL: Firmware 5.00, voice capabilities
Organization: Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 21:00:58 GMT

schuster@panix.com (Michael Schuster) writes:

>>Where can I found a voice program to transform my ZyXEL in a answering machine?

>It's in beta test, as is the firmware you "received".

Will this be PC/MS-DOS binary only stuff or are the interfaces documented,
so that you can develop your own SW?

Will the documentation be as good as the Class2 FAX doc?  *YUCK*

\Bernhard.
--
Bernhard Schneck              | Email: Bernhard.Schneck@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE
GeNUA Gesellschaft fuer Netz- | TU Muenchen Physik | There is no problem so big
und UNIX-Administration mbH   | 8046 Garching      | that it cannot be run away
8000 Muenchen 83, Germany     | Germany            | from.   Illusions, R. Bach
From: colemant@yvax.byu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: need help to configure new system w/ modem
Date: 19 Aug 92 14:18:39 -0700
Organization: Brigham Young University

My uncle bought a complete system with modem last month.  It is a 386 clone 
runningdos 5.0 with vga etc... it has a 2400 modem internal.  The machine 
was soughtto do telemarketing.  He has the latest version of lotus and some 
generic software to run the modem.

It didn't work for him, ie the modem acts dead.  So instead of paying $40 per
hour to have some guy look at it he called me.  I went over and tinkered with
it and could not get the modem to respond to a simple atz command.  I tried com 
ports one and two to no avail (three and four don't exist on his system).  He 
does not have a mouse or printer on the machine.  I would like to get his thing
going but have hit a wall I don't know how to climb.  Help!

What things should I probe at?  What info is needed to continue?  What ftp
software can help?   What kind of hardware is needed to have the computer
simulate a voice over the phone?

 Please help me do this favor.
 
 Thank you in advance,  Tom Coleman       colemant@yvax.byu.edu
 
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,biz.comp.telebit
From: tal@Warren.MENTORG.COM (Tom Limoncelli)
Subject: TB2500 to TB2500 problem
Organization: Mentor Graphics, Silicon Design Division
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 19:37:19 GMT

I have the following problem, which I hope someone can suggest a
solution.

Configuration:  We have a dial-back system with a set of rack-mounted
TB2500's.  We have modems constantly using the system (or should I say,
being dialed by the system) and it all works except when the user is
another TB2500, T1600's and generic 2400bps modems work.

Due to the way our dialback system works, both modems get ringed and
are expected to pick up the phone and "answer".  This means that the
dialback modem must "answer" with the originate tones.  In other words,
the dialback system dials the user's phone, at the same time it fakes a
ringing signal on the dialback modem's phone line.  Both modems think
they are sensing a ringing phone and answer the phone, but one is in
answer mode and one is in "s100=1" mode (answer the phone with
originate tones) so they should be able to connect.

As I said, we have no problem with T1600's or 2400bps modems connecting
to the system.  It's just T2500's dialing in.

Here are the registers on the dialback phone (that think's it is
answering the phone):

E0 F1 Q4 P V1 W0 X1 Y0 &P0 &T4     Version GF7.03-T2500RM
S00=001 S01=000 S02=043 S03=013 S04=010 S05=008 S06=002 S07=040 S08=002 S09=006
S10=007 S11=070 S12=050 S18=000 S25=005 S26=000 S38=000 
S41=000 S45:255 S47=004 S48=000 S49=000 
S50=000 S51:005 S52:004 S54:003 S55:003 S56=017 S57=019 S58:002 S59=000 
S61=150 S62=003 S63=001 S64:001 S65=000 S66:001 S67:001 S68:002 S69=000 
S90=000 S91=000 S92=000 S93=008 S94=001 S95:002 S96=001 S97:001 S98=003 
S100:001 S101=000 S102=000 S103=000 S104=000 S105=001 S106:001 S107=020 
S110=255 S111=255 S112=001 
S121=000 S130=002 S131:001 
S150=000 S151=004 S152=001 S153=001 S154=000 S155=000 S157=000 S158=000 
S160=010 S161=020 S162=002 S163=003 S164=007 S169=000 S255:001 
 
 
Here are the registers on the answering phone (that knows it is
answering the phone):

E0 F1 Q4 T V1 W0 X1 Y0 &P0 &T4     Version GF7.03-T2500RM
S00=001 S01=000 S02=043 S03=013 S04=010 S05=008 S06=002 S07=040 S08=002 S09=006
S10=007 S11=070 S12=050 S18=000 S25=005 S26=000 S38=000 
S41=000 S45:255 S47=004 S48=000 S49=000 
S50=000 S51:005 S52:004 S54:003 S55:003 S56=017 S57=019 S58:002 S59=000 
S61=150 S62=003 S63=001 S64:001 S65=000 S66:001 S67:001 S68:002 S69=000 
S90=000 S91=000 S92=000 S93=008 S94=001 S95:002 S96=001 S97:001 S98=003 
S100=000 S101=000 S102=000 S103=000 S104=000 S105=001 S106:001 S107=020 
S110=255 S111=255 S112=001 
S121=000 S130=002 S131:001 
S150=000 S151=004 S152=001 S153=001 S154=000 S155=000 S157=000 S158=000 
S160=010 S161=020 S162=002 S163=003 S164=007 S169=000 S255=000 
 
Thanks in advance!

Tom

-- 
Tom Limoncelli -- tal@warren.mentorg.com (work) -- tal@plts.uucp (play)
  I know what I'm going to do about this whole USL vs. BSDI law suit!
          "Hello, DEC?  Send me a copy of OpenVMS, please!"
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems