HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: bnoble+@cs.cmu.edu (Brian Noble)
Subject: Cal Alumnus Spites Woof Gods
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 21:10:51 GMT

Another year of pain.  Oh well.  What a surprise.  And all that.

But, *I* know exactly who is to blame for all of this.  Two people
exactly.  Two fellow Cal Alumni.  Who will remain nameless.  Mainly
because they would probably be lynched if anyone ever found out what
they did.

In announcing the Pittsburgh-Area Cal Alumni Association and Stanford
Alumni Club's gathering at an area sports bar to watch the game (and
we even got to see it live, thanks to the CAA's providing of satellite
coordinates used by SportsChannel in taping the game for later
rebroadcast) one such Cal Alumnus boldly predicted (read: woofed) that
Cal would pull off a "huge upset."

So, the rest of us realized he woofed.  No problem, we thought, we'll
just make him buy the first round of drinks to cleanse his soul.  Not
only that, but we'll also reserve one of the beers from that first
round as a sacrifice to the Woofing Gods, in hopes that They would not
spite us yet again.

His first mistake was buying Iron City.  For those of you who haven't
yet visited Our Fair City and sampled this brew, consider yourselves
lucky.  The stuff is putrid.  So, we made him pound that one, and then
buy a Molsen.  So far so good.

Then, the unspeakable happened.  His wife came up, and ignoring our
somewhat virulent protests, DRANK THE SACRIFICE TO THE WOOF GODS!
Doom was then ensured.

We quickly attempted to fill the breech with a bottle of Heineken, but
by then the Woof Gods had turned a very Cold Shoulder indeed our way.
End of story.  At least the Stanford alumni that were there didn't rub
it in.  Too badly.  Mainly because sports bars don't have piles of
rock salt laying around for just such a use.

One pseudo-bright spot: the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation was having a
silent auction during the Big Game, which also happened to coincide
with the now-ex-annual contest between two Pennsylvania teams.  I put
in a $55 bid for two Pitt season tickets, plus two Pitt t-shirts
thrown in as a bonus.  Since Pitt tickets are not exactly hard to come
by, this was the winning bid.  The t-shirts will make nice Christmas
gifts.  The tickets probably aren't worth $55, but Pitt has a decent
schedule next year --- I'll get to see them get beat by some of the
better teams in football.

Brian
  - I just want to see us win the Big Game before I die.  Is that
    too much to ask?

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason Fawcett)
Subject: Re: Michigan, ND, Miami etc ...
Reply-To: jfawcett@encore.com (Jason "Raise Cane" Fawcett)
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:19:56 GMT

News-Software: NN 6.4.16

In <1992Nov17.035732.580@news.nd.edu> rszczerb@boole.helios.nd.edu (Robert Szczerba) writes:

| Can anyone give me any justification why Michigan is
| still ranked ahead of ND in the AP poll?  About the only
| significant thing Michigan did this season was to tie ND.
| They almost lost to Purdue and they played a pathetic game
| against Illinois and went for a last second tie ... giving
| up any chance to win the MNC.
| 
| ND, on the other hand, beat BYU, Boston College, and
| Penn State.  If they keep the string alive and beat  
| USC then I don't see why they should be ranked behind
| the Wolverines.  ANy other opinions ...
| 
 1. ND played Michigan for a tie.
 2. ND has a loss, Michigan doesn't.
 3. Lou's headlock on the Ref.
 4. ND's fake punt when they were ahead 37-0 over BC.
 5. ND is the most hated team in football.
 6. All of the above.
From: bakken@cs.arizona.edu (Dave Bakken)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: PAC-10 vs. Big-10 (was Re: Mediocracy vs Money)
Date: 20 Nov 92 01:14:01 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson

In article <BILLMS.92Nov19185113@gip.eecs.umich.edu> billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith) writes:
>In article <1992Nov19.202837.21682@serval.net.wsu.edu> jjungbau@meriadoc.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer) writes:
>
>   No kidding!  It's especially ridiculous that the Big Ten will probably
>   have as many or more teams in bowls than the PAC-10.  Every time I hear
>   about Iowa going to the Copper Bowl at 6-5 I cringe, knowing that WSU is
>   more deserving.  Even if we lose the Apple Cup, at 7-4, we're still better
>   than Iowa.
>
>What teams has WSU lost to, and which ones has it beaten?  Iowa has lost to
>several ranked teams, and looked pretty darn good through the year.  They
>gave Miami a game, though not a real scare.

Wazzu beat Arizona, which if course almost beat Miami and did beat
the UW.  It has also beaten UCLA, Fresno State, and Arizona State.
It lost a close game to USC (lost in the last few minutes),
and not so close to Oregon and Stanford.
--
Dave Bakken                               Internet: bakken@cs.arizona.edu
Dept. of Computer Science; U of Arizona   Voice:    +1 602 621 4098      
Tucson, AZ 85721; USA                     FAX:      +1 602 621 4246
The fact that you're paranoid doesn't prove they're *not* out to get you.
Newsgroups: osu.sports,rec.sport.football.college
From: billms@eecs.umich.edu (William Mangione-Smith)
Subject: Re: no respect for tOSU
Organization: University of Michigan
	<1992Nov23.194531.16447@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 20:53:36 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.194531.16447@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> agillum@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Aaron C Gillum) writes:

   Aaron Gillum

   PS. Last year in Ann Arbor, a sign said that the capacity was 101,000 - That 
   day, the scoreboard said that the days attendance was about 109,000. Seems like
   the almighty dollar makes the decision for you Holy Wolverines as well, eh 
   Mike?

The announced attendance has *never* been 109.  I believe 106 is in the
record, but I'm not sure.  In any case, thats counting every live body in the
stadium including those in the pressbox, guarding the stands, and on the
sidelines.  I don't know if all schools count attendance that way, but I
doubt that Michigan is really an exception.  In any case, money has nothing
to do with it, only those with one of the 101+ seats pay.

Bill
--
-------------------------------
	Bill Mangione-Smith
	billms@eecs.umich.edu
From: mlsa@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (MICHAEL LAUREN SHERMAN)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Super Conference to end East Coast Bias...
Date: 22 Nov 92 01:44:17 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1em1e8INNga1@agate.berkeley.edu>, hackett@ocf.berkeley.edu (William
Hackett) writes:
>
>
>
>What about UCLA,USC,Stanford,Cal, Texas,Texas A&M,Rice , and Houston
>forming a Super Texas California Conference to Dominate The East Coast
>in everything.  Acacdemically would be one of the stongest conferences
>bar none including Ivy Leauge..  All Schools have a descent Academic
>record..  Atheletically With Texas TexasA&M UCLA USC perenally football
>powers.  Stanford and Texas womens basketball, baseball,Track, Swimming
>and Diving top 5...  UCLA Stanford Texas and Houston Basketball powers
>
>Hey this conference has it all. Then Pac Ten can expand adding a couple
>of teams maybe a San Jose St.... SWC can add UTEP and UTSA or maybe
>we just merge whats left of those conferences...
>
>Texas and Calfornia Team up to End EAST COAST BIAS and create the best
>conference in everything :-) Bar NONE!!!
Except the ACC Basketball, Football.  Academics: Duke, UVa, Wake, Clemson, Ga.
Tech, Maryland and UNC  Golf, Women's Basketball:  Va, Maryland etc.  I
suppose I could go on, But there is only so much I can say to an Idiot like
you except that not only does the ACC currently exist, but this T/C conference
is just impossible, read any of the earlier posts about UofT and aTm getting
held hostage by the Texas Legislature.  Grow A Brain.
-- 
MICHAEL LAUREN SHERMAN
758-0207
MLSA

"I really do appreciate the fact you're sitting here, you're voice sounds so
wonderful but your face don't look too clear so barmaid bring a pitcher,
another round of brew, why don't we get drunk and screw?"- J. Buffett
From: vancleef@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Why Michigan sucks...
Date: 18 Nov 92 01:44:03 EST

I was talking to my brother on the phone in NYC tonight, he is going to
be here to go to the OSU-Michigan game, and he made an interesting
set of comments.

Basically, Moeller is a jerk. The way he played the Illinois game by
going for the tie instead of the win was lame. Also a BIG LETDOWN for
all of those Michigan fans who wanted a MNC this year.

Lets look at it:

Go for the field goal:	1) Make it you win the Big-10 Championship but you
			throw the National Championship out the window.

			2) Fail and you lost the National Championship bid
			and play OSU for the Big-10 Championship.

Go for the touchdown:	3) Make it you win the Big-10 Championship, keep the
			National Championship alive, beat OSU and its
			almost in the bag.

			4) Fail and you lost the National Championship bid
			and play OSU for the Big-10 Championship.

By going for 1) he takes the easy way out, but also proves that Michigan
is *not* a MNC caliber team. Too bad. Also makes the OSU-Michigan game more
of a grudge match.

By going for 3) he has much more to gain, the worse that can happen is
4) which is also 2), and if Michigan is a MNC caliber team they should be
able to win this one.

So you see, Moeller BETRAYED MICHIGAN. He is a hosebag and I will be at The
Game (or to Moeller 'that game', what a chump). We will crush MICHIGAN, watch
Moeller go down in flames. What a dick.

GO BUCKS!!!

-Garrett



Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: rwd4f@poe.acc.Virginia.EDU (Rob Dobson)
Subject: Re: Iron Bowl
Keywords: anti-woof
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 19:52:04 GMT


this is not just anti-woofing; this is memories from my childhood in
alabama. it seems that the team who is highest ranked almost always
loses this one. Remember when bama was 4-6 coming into The Game, Auburn
was riding high, and bama pulls off the huge upset? could happen
again. its such a cheesy cliche, but throw away the records when these
two teams play each other.....

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: tino@yogi.metray (Vinny Tino)
Subject: Re: FSU's uniforms
Reply-To: tino@yogi.metray
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 14:15:55 GMT

In article 10619@b30.ingr.com, rick@seminole.b30.ingr.com (Rick Hopkins) writes:
>I caught a few highlights from the FSU - Tulane game on ESPN.  Where did 
>those ugly Garnet and Garnet uniforms come from.  I think they make FSU 
>look like a Division III team.  They're almost as ugly as Kansas' blue on 
>blue uniforms.
>
>rick "Garnet and Gold" hopkins
>rick@seminole.b30.ingr.com
>

Rick,

Our good friend Burt Reynolds bought them for the team.  I don't think Bobby 
had the heart to tell him how ugly he thought they were... I want the gold
pants back......

---
------------------ Vincent Tino - Studentus Graduatus Perpetuus ---------------
----------------- Dept. of Meteorology, Florida State University --------------
-------------------- Meteorologists like it warm and wet! ---------------------
*************************------- GO SEMINOLES -------**************************
============================ tino@ray.met.fsu.edu =============================

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (Jim Jungbauer)
Subject: Re: WeekEnd WacK  11/22/92
Organization: Washington State University, Pullman
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 92 00:21:36 GMT

In article <1992Nov23.233303.7407@news.Hawaii.Edu> bill@gaza.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (William J. King) writes:
>(in approx. order)
>		conf    o all
>		W L	W L T
>Hawaii          6 2     8 2      
>bwhyu		6 2     8 4
>FresnoSt	5 2	7 4
>S.D. St.	5 3     5 4 1
>Utah		4 4 	6 5
>Air F.		4 4	7 4
>Wyo		3 5 	5 7
>ColoSt		3 5 	5 7 
>N.Mex.		2 6 	3 8
>TeX ElP		1 6	1 9
>
>Hawaii, FresnoSt, S.D.st, AF, and BeeYou are all bowl bound.   5!

Make it 6.  Utah will play WSU in the Copper Bowl.  Six teams
from the WAC?!  SDSU at 5-4-1 and Utah at 6-5?  Hmmmm...

Jim
-- 
Jim Jungbauer                 |  Go Vikings, North Stars, Cougars!
jjungbau@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu    | 
EECS Department               |  "Nice move by Bellows... big drive... SCORES!"
Washington State University   |     -- Mike Emrick, 1991 Norris Division Finals
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: allen@tessi.com (Allen Warren)
Subject: Re: OSU beats Michigan: 13-13
Organization: Test Systems Strategies, Inc., Beaverton, Oregon
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 07:16:15 GMT

hpang@engin.umich.edu (Ho Sun Pang) writes:
>On Rose Bowl:  A pathetic 3-ties team vs. a team who lost big-time at WSU,
>may be I should watch the Alabama and Canes instead...


Since I live in Oregon, I get to watch a lot of Pac-10 games and the
Washington loss to WSU was probably more due to weather than anything
else.  The game was played in Pullman, WA and the weather was:  cold
and VERY snowy!  It snowed rather hard the entire game and both sides
were doing a lot of slipping and sliding.  WSU just kept running the ball
up the middle almost the entire game.  I don't think Washington would
have been THAT bad if the weather wasn't so lousy.

allen

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Subject: Re: FSU 1993 Schedule
Reply-To: oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov  (Orin Day)
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:19:57 GMT

In article <1992Nov17.152511.15960@b30.ingr.com> rick@seminole.b30.ingr.com  
(Rick Hopkins) writes:

> Side note:  it was great to see Notre Dame go for the win
> instead of the tie last week unlike Michigan.

Do you mean unlike ND against Michigan?

Or Michigan tying Illinois?  The Michigan tie was not an extra
point choice, but a field goal, thus a different situation.

Also, a tie clinched the Rose for Michigan, whereas ND needed
the win against PSU for better bowl consideration.    

--
************* "How about a little fire, Scarecrow?" **************
Orin Day, Code 664.1                    oday@lobster.gsfc.nasa.gov
Hughes STX/NASA       GSFC Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics
*******"Think that this is NASA's opinion?   NO, NO, NO!!!" ******
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: zmed0b@trc.amoco.com (Michael E. Dupree)
Subject: Re: OU over OSU woof
Originator: zmed0b@zircon
Organization: Amoco Production Company, Tulsa Research
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:36:05 GMT


In article <1992Nov17.005141.29636@a.cs.okstate.edu>, cooperr@a.cs.okstate.edu (COOPER ROBERT BRYA) writes:
> In article <1992Nov16.111657@trc.amoco.com> zmed0b@trc.amoco.com (Michael) writes:
> >
> >In article <1992Nov15.190338.28639@a.cs.okstate.edu>, chen@a.cs.okstate.edu (SMITH LISA MIN-YI) writes:
> >> In article <1992Nov13.213733.22015@spdc.ti.com> dostalik@epcot.spdc.ti.com (Bill Dostalik) writes:
> >> >Useless, if you're not an OU or OSU fan, I guess.  I was just trying to get
> >> >a response from a poke fan.  But those are few and far between.  
> >> >I suppose you're right, it was useless.
> >> 
> >> Why respond to a 'useless' article?
> >> 
> >> Whatcha think about OU going for the tie instead of the win?  Kinda lowering
> >> your standards, huh?
> >> 
> >> - lisa
> >> 
> >
> >Gee, what to do you think OU was doing for the 40 seconds before the field goal?
> >Going for the win.  That's what.  
> 
> So whats your point?  That OU should have just kicked the field goal on
> first down, instead?  OF COURSE they were trying to get into the endzone
> on downs 1-3, what are they supposed to do?  Lisa is asking if it was
> Gibbs wimping out by not TRYING to win the game on 4th down.  
> 
> I think Gibbs knows his career is totally over if he loses to OSU, but
> at least a tie will keep his paycheck coming in till the end of the season.
> 
> One point that the OSU qb made was:  that OU tied OSU, not the other
> way around.  It was OU that had to kick the field goal in a game that
> they never lead.  
> 
> Bryan Cooper, cooperr@a.cs.okstate.edu
> ps. peace
> 
> 

Oh, right.  I'm sure that OSU would have done the same thing had they been in
that position.  We don't feel a bit guilty.  After all, we did the same thing
to you that Colorado did to us.  Get over it.  And for your information, Gundy
made the call. Not Gibbs.

I was in Stillwater during and after the game.  My observation was that it was
fascinating how the much of the Aggie discussion was on Gibbs and how close he
is to being gone.  Now let us compare Gibb's record to Pat Jones.  I don't think
there is much of an argument in Stillwater for Gibbs to be ousted.  I'm sure
Pat Jones wouldn't mind having Gibb's record.

And by the way, OSU played quite well on Saturday.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: jfrederi@encore.com (Justin Frederich)
Subject: Re: Super Conference to end East Coast Bias...
Organization: Encore Computer Corporation
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 00:48:26 GMT

hackett@ocf.berkeley.edu (William Hackett) writes:

>What about UCLA,USC,Stanford,Cal, Texas,Texas A&M,Rice , and Houston
>forming a Super Texas California Conference to Dominate The East Coast
>in everything.  Acacdemically would be one of the stongest conferences
                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>bar none including Ivy Leauge..  All Schools have a descent Academic
                                                     ^^^^^^^
     (can you tell us why they're all declining at the same time ??)

>record..  Atheletically With Texas TexasA&M UCLA USC perenally football
>powers.  Stanford and Texas womens basketball, baseball,Track, Swimming
>and Diving top 5...  UCLA Stanford Texas and Houston Basketball powers

>Hey this conference has it all. Then Pac Ten can expand adding a couple
>of teams maybe a San Jose St.... SWC can add UTEP and UTSA or maybe 
>we just merge whats left of those conferences... 

>Texas and Calfornia Team up to End EAST COAST BIAS and create the best
>conference in everything :-) Bar NONE!!!

     This is just a big joke to reel in the fish - isn't it ?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: mminihan@inetg1.ARCO.COM (Mike Minihan)
Subject: Re: OU over OSU woof
Organization: ARCO Oil and Gas Company
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 21:25:53 GMT

In article <1992Nov15.190338.28639@a.cs.okstate.edu>, chen@a.cs.okstate.edu
(SMITH LISA MIN-YI) writes:
> In article <1992Nov13.213733.22015@spdc.ti.com>
> dostalik@epcot.spdc.ti.com (Bill Dostalik) writes:
> >Useless, if you're not an OU or OSU fan, I guess.  I was just trying to
> get
> >a response from a poke fan.  But those are few and far between.  
> >I suppose you're right, it was useless.
> 
> Why respond to a 'useless' article?
> 
> Whatcha think about OU going for the tie instead of the win?  Kinda
> lowering
> your standards, huh?
> 
> - lisa
> 
Not really Lisa, it's the way the stupid system works. Are you telling me
that if OU would have kicked the field goal first that OSU would not have
done the same thing. Just ask ND, Colorado, Michigan. 

The two things that College Football needs NOW is:

             1.  A tie breaker.
             2.  A play-off system.

It's funny, I always here coaches say don't let the press pick your
quarterback. Then answer I want is why do they let them pick the national
champion? Let's solve it on the field.
-- 

Mike Minihan      mminihan@arco.com
From: daniel@acpub.duke.edu (Daniel Crawford)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
Subject: Re: Iron Bowl
Date: 24 Nov 92 00:58:13 GMT
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

In article <1992Nov23.230137.5915@exu.ericsson.se} exustp@exu.ericsson.se writes:
}In article 16060@b11.b11.ingr.com, gibson@b11.b11.ingr.com (Stanley) writes:
}}OK it's here. Iron Bowl week. Most people are picking the Tide to
}}roll over Auburn like an 18 wheeler over a decaying road kill. To
}}insure this I will apply some anti-woofing. Let's compare the
}}results of the six common opponents they faced.
}}
}}		Alabama		Auburn
}}Vandy		+17		+24
}}S. Miss	+7		+8
}}Arkansas	+27		Tie (They wuz robbed. Shoulda won by
}}				     at least 21)
}}Ole Miss	+21		-14 (This was early in the season,
}}				    on the road and a TON of bad breaks)
}}LSU		+20		+2  (Auburn had a big lead and went
}}				    to sleep)
}}Miss St	+9		-7  Bama should have lost by 10
}-----------------------------------------------
}***********************************************
}              ** 101 ***      ** 13 **
}***********************************************
}
}}Based on this Auburn is the superior team and should prevail by
}}10-14 points. All we can hope for is an upset by the Tide!!
}}
}}Roll Tide!!
}}Stanley
}
}How can you say Auburn is the Superior Team? The numbers speak for themselves....

I believe, if one reads between the lines, that Stanley is trying to
avoid angering the woof gawds, a practice I highly recommend.
	 
I agree with Stanley...Auburn is the FAR superior team, and all we can
hope for is that the Bama squad can get a _few_ points.  I certainly
would hate to see those fellows have their hopes crushed by the
overwhelming talent on the Auburn squad. (Apologies to David Swanger,
but somehow I think you understand....)

T. Daniel Crawford
Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry
University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602
(Bama fan since birth, Duke fan since college....)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: zaichunl@cs.tamu.edu (Zack Li)
Subject: Re: Texas A&M vs. Houston
Organization: Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 04:46:27 GMT

In article <1992Nov13.142809.11885@bsu-ucs>, 00mafrank@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu writes:
|> I watched the Texas A&M - Houston game last night.  It was
|> a good game.  For awhile I thought Houston would win until
|> Texas A&M exploded in the third quarter.  Was this the same
|> Houston team that Michigan killed about 62-7 earlier in the
|> season _at_ Houston?  Was their first-string quarterback
|> injured or something?  I'm not being sarcastic, it just
|> surprises me as to why Texas A&M would have such a tough time
|> at home with a team that was 3-5 going into the game.
|> 
|> Mark Frank

According to your reasoning, the Aggies should blow out UH. And by the same 
reasoning, since UH defeated Illin. by 30 something, Michigan should win
the Mich-Illin game by 90-something :-)

Well...

- Da zack


Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: weyland@sn.jsc.nasa.gov (WEYLAND,MARK)
Subject: Re: TEXAS aTm - got screwed
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: University of Arizona MIS Department - Mosaic Group
Distribution: na
Date: 19 Nov 1992 20:53 CST  

In article <1992Nov19.215031.11822@en.ecn.purdue.edu>, lauson@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Patrick W Lauson) writes...
>In article <1992Nov18.192151.9245@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> wingfiel@lonestar.utsa.edu (Kevin J. Wingfield) writes:
> 
>>        After all, the Aggies topped
>>        Stanford, which blitzed Notre Dame, by the way who put
>>        a tie on the unblemished record of Michigan.  The Ags, also
>>        defeated Houston handidly, which manhandled Illinois,
>>        who also tied Michigan and who also ripped Ohio State ---
>>        the top two teams in the Big Ten.
> 
>Yea, Illinois beat Ohio State, who beat Syracuse, who beat Texas, who beat
>everyone else in the SWC (and will beat A&M).  Sorry, bud, but noone on
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	While I am greatly looking forward to the t.u. game, they must 
first get by a motivated Baylor team.

GIG'EM  AGS!!!

Mark Weyland
Texas A&M University - Class of '88