HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: gt6390a@prism.gatech.EDU (BERNSTEIN,AVRON P)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Best Draft ever (was: 1972 Dolphins)
Date: 29 Sep 92 14:00:29 GMT
Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology


I goofed.  That should be WEBSTER, not Wagner.  It was LATE when I posted that
and I botched it.  Mike Webster is the soon-to-be Hall of Fame center, while
Mike Wagner is the defensive back.
-- 
BERNSTEIN,AVRON P
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt6390a
Internet: gt6390a@prism.gatech.edu
From: rich@quik.clearpoint.com
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Patriots News 9/22
Date: 2 Oct 92 15:46:46 GMT
	<RICH.92Sep30165508@quik.clearpoint.com>
	<1992Sep30.202518.19553@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Reply-To: rich@jasmine.clearpoint.com
Organization: Clearpoint Research Corp, Hopkinton MA 01748


I do agree that their offensive line is weak. But their where times when pass
protection was good, and Millen couldn't deliver the ball. Their offensive line
just needs some seasoning. They do have Harlow, Chung and Armstrong, but the 
center Chilton has got to go. He spends more time on his back then a two dollar
whore. I agree that more offensive linemen are needed, but they still need a
quarternback.

Rich
From: aephel01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Help - Status of L.Lipps and M.Clayton
Date: 1 Oct 92 19:29:31 GMT
Article-I.D.: ulkyvx.1992Oct1.152931.1
Organization: University of Louisville

In article <1992Oct1.162419.18911@news2.cis.umn.edu>, dubear@molbio.cbs.umn.edu (Dubear Kroening) writes:
> I posted this a while ago and received nary a response.  Can someone please
> tell me if M. Clayton (Miami) has been reactivated and will be starting on Sun?
> I haven't seen a word about it in the papers.  (C'mon Doug the Dolfan - you mustknow!) 
> 
> Also, does anybody know if Louis Lipps will start (or play at all) at wide 
> receiver for New Orleans.  I know he ran back kicks last Sun., but is he ready
> to play WR?
> 
> Please either post or e-mail me directly.  Thanks so much in advance.
> 
> Dubear - still a Packer fan (can you believe I still admit it?)

   Uh... this is doug the dolfan... uh, okay so it's his brother.  He has
spouted this week often enough that Clayton will be playing.

-- no sig necessary --
       Aza
From: jblixt@neon.cdc.com (Jon Blixt)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: EAGLES, COWBOYS
Date: 6 Oct 92 15:39:55 GMT
Reply-To: jblixt@mips.COM (Jon Blixt)
Organization: People fed up with politicians, not politics

Much to my surprise this morning I have received no woofs or
anti-woofs from all those Eagle and Cowboy fans.
I can see the silence from the Cowboy fans since their team
fell apart numerous times last night(4 turnovers? 3 INT's!).
Where's MR. CAPS-LOCK when you need him?

Thoughts on the game.  The teams IMO seemed fairly evenly 
matched despite the score of the game.  Had it not been for
those horrendous turnovers, this could have been a close
game.  I have to feel though the Eagles are the better team
strictly because of their defense.  They just don't make
hardly any mistakes at all.  When they do, however, they can
be real costly(Micheal Irvin's only decent catch of the night).

As far as the rest of the season goes, I see the Eagles going 
further simply because they are a more experience team who 
wants to win more badly than the Cowboys.  This could be
the fact the Cowboys are a younger team who can always look to
the future.

Come'on Woofers, it wouldn't be the net without you.

-Jon
From: jmd@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (joseph.m.dakes)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Questions about Eagles
Summary: Rebuilding
Date: 30 Sep 92 19:57:54 GMT
Article-I.D.: cbnewsm.1992Sep30.195754.21261
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T

In article <1992Sep30.132148.2998@athena.mit.edu>, centry@athena.mit.edu (Jae H Nam) writes:
> 	I know about the Seals and Beach(ex-Jet, what a surprise...)
> acquisitions, but I was wondering if there are any current moves
> going on.

No roster moves have been announced for the Dallas game.  I would like
to see TE-Maurice Johnson added now that he is eligible.  But who am I
to argue with a coach who's 3-0 and 13-6 overall?

> 	I know that the Eagles are pretty solid right now, but
> you can never have too much talent and depth, esp. because of the
> possibility of injuries.  Plus we should always be building for the
> future.

Agreed.  Which is why the Eagles went after Leon Seals, to give them
that depth on the defensive line that they are accustomed to having.

The Eagles are doing a decent job of building for the future.  They
have good young talent at the widereceiver position in Barnett and
Williams with Sydner slowly being worked into the game plan. On the
offensive line they have Davis and Floyd who can anchor the line for
ten years.  They also drafted some young running backs (Stacy and
Brooks) who have yet to prove themselves.  And don't forget that
Casey Weldon is being groomed at QB.  On the other side of the ball,
the Eagles drafted a couple of good defensive linemen in Harmon and
Flores.  Both are playing well in limited paying time.  LB William
Thomas is in only his second season and Eric Allen and Ben Smith,
if he returns healthy, should be on the corners for quite a while.
You can only build up a couple areas at a time.  The Eagles addressed
the main concerns, i.e. RB, OL and DL, the past two seasons.  Look for
them to address TE and either LB or the secondary next year.

> 	I'll probably get flamed for this, but what about a trade
> for Andre Rison for some draft picks?  Rison should be the next Rice
> and he's young and in Glanville's doghouse (or so I've heard...).

FLAME FLAME FLAME FLAME FLAME!!!!!  You don't build for the future
by trading draft picks.  Especially not for a player at a position
where the Eagles are loaded.  Unless they're for some low rounders,
but for Andre Rison?  That would be stupid, IMO.

> 	I know we have Williams and Barnett, but could you imagine
> what Rison, who is constantly double-teamed, would do for our
> offense???  We'd have one of the youngest and one of the best
> trio's in the NFL! (apologies to Skin's fans - NOT!).  They could
> have the potential of helping the Eagles for years and years and ...
> ... wild delusions of grandeur and ramblings of dynasties ...  :)

I would much rather have Williams, Barnett, and Sydner along with
a first rounder.

> 	But seriously, why not?

Because the Eagles don't need another wideout.  At least not at the
expense of a first round pick or two.


E-A-G-L-E-S

Joe Dakes
AT&T Microelectronics
555 Union Boulevard
Allentown, PA  18103
alux2!jmd
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: gsprow@lordvader.nswc.navy.mil (Gregg Sprow)
Subject: This weeks line?
Organization: Naval Surface Warfare Center
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 12:35:22 GMT

 Does anyone know the current line for this week, especially the Dolphs-Bills
 game?

  ~~~~~~~ GO DOLPHINS! ~~~~~~~~~

 Gregg Sprow
 NSWCDD
 Dahlgren,VA
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: lej@pdn.paradyne.com (Leo James)
Subject: Re: Thoughts on Keith Jackson & the Dolphins
Keywords: Dolphins, Eagles, TE
Organization: AT&T Paradyne, Largo, Florida
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 16:20:36 GMT

I think the signing of Keith Jackson and Garin Veris shows that the
players have the owners on the run. I thought that,  when the court
declared these players as free agents for a week, the NFL was going
to have to sign at least some of these guys,  because failing to do
so would have proved collusion  and opened the owners up  to really
massive legal losses later.  I'm still not convinced that the NFLPA
WON'T be the first athletic  "union" to force management to open up
their books.
--
+---------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
|Leopold E. James     | "A heart, a soul, AND | AT&T Paradyne         |
|ph: (813) 530-8425   |  a mind are terrible  | P.O. Box 2826, LG-132,|
|lej@pdn.paradyne.com |  things to waste."    | Largo, FL 34649 (USA) |
From: aj639@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Cox)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Miami Stats for Week 5 (Phhhhlllbbbtttttt on Buffalo!)
Date: 5 Oct 1992 16:28:38 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aj639@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Michael Cox)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


Week 5 stats for Miami (in the game they DESTROYED Buffalo!!!)

		   1	 2	 3	4	Final
Miami..............3	14	17	3	37
Buffalo............3	 7	 0	0	10

First Quarter
Buffalo: FG Christie 40, 10:08
Miami: FG Stoyanovich 39, 15:00

Second Quarter
Miami: Jackson 24 pass from Marino (Stoyanovich kick) 7:21
Miami: Paige 5 pass from Marino (Stoyanovich Kick) 13:05
Buffalo: Reed 16 pass from Kelly (Christie kick), 14:15

Third Quarter
Miami: Humphrey 9 pass from Marino (Stoyanovich kick) 5:37
Miami: Oliver 103 interception return (Stoyanovich kick) 10:22
Miami: FG Stoyanovich 43, 14:06

Fourth Quarter
Miami: FG Stoyanovich 34, 5:41

Attendance: 80,368


			    Miami		Buffalo
First Downs................. 20			26
Rushes-yards................ 26-80		22-63
Passing Yards............... 282		337
Return Yards................ 232		64
Passing (Comp./Att./Int).... 21-33-1		31-58-4
Sacked-Yards Lost........... 0-0		3-28
Punts (No./Avg.)............ 4-36               4-40
Fumbles-Lost................ 0-0		2-1
Penalties-Yards............. 11-80    		4-35
Time of Possesion........... 32:07		27:53

Rushing:(Carries-Yards)
Higgs 15-37, Humphrey 4-22, Marino 2-13, Craver 3-9, Saxon 1-0, Mitchell 1 -
minus 1

Passing:(Completed-Attempted-INT-Yards)
Marino 21-33-1-282, Mitchell 0-0-0-0

Receiving:(Receptions-Yards)
Humphrey 6-72, Jackson, 4-64, Clayton 4-56, Paige 3-35, Martin 2-47, Banks 1-6,
Duper 1-2

Summary:
Well, I can't really give an unbiased summary as I am a true-aqua Miami fan.
But, I can say that Miami's defense played superbly using a new strategy with
only 2 linemen and the rest were linebackers.  The 2 interceptions for big
yardage, with one for a TD, by Oliver was a key factor in pumping up the Miami
defense.  They did what they had to do:  Stop Thurman Thomas and then put
points on the board to force Kelly to play catch up, which he is very
unsuccessful in doing. (IMHO)

Mike
P.S.  This information was taken out of the October 5, 1992 Washington Post.
-- 
Okay, look for AmoNER Disk #4 on: (And, AMOS PRO is coming SOON!)
ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (128.174.5.59) in /amiga/amoner
nic.funet.fi (128.214.6.100) in /pub/amiga/programming/amos
From: ric@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (ricardo.g.irvin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Leonard Marshall's Status
Date: 28 Sep 92 15:49:21 GMT
Article-I.D.: cbnewsj.1992Sep28.154921.3563
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T

In article <27000109@hpcc01.corp.hp.com> castillc@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (Christopher R. Castillo) writes:
>
>
>Re: Status of Leonard Marshall (NYG)????
>
>    Does anyone know if he is gone for the season??
>...
>    Any response will be great!
>
Leonard should be back for the Raiders game.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: aperkins@lonestar.utsa.edu (Aaron B. Perkins)
Subject: EAGLES WILL WIN THE BIG ONE
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 15:36:59 GMT


OK HERE ARE THE STATS FOR THE UPCOMING MONDAY NIGHT GAME:(THESE NEED TO BE
                                                          CHECKED AFTER THE
                                                          GAME)

                            EAGLES 42
                            COWPUSSIES 3

                    EAGLES
                    ------
            RANDALL: 15-19 265 YARDS 3TDS 0 INT
                     5-80 RUSHING

            BARNETT: 9-158 YARDS RECIEVING
            WALKER:26-121 YARDS 2TDS
            WILLIAMS:5-105 YARDS
            EAGLES DEFENSE: 5 SACKS, 2 FUMBLES CAUSED,
                            1 TD.


                COWPUSSIES
                ----------
            ACHYMAN:14-26 185 YARDS 0 TDS, 3 INT
            SLIPTH:23-86 YARDS, 0 TDS, 2 FUMBLES
            SWERVIN IRVIN:5-45 YARDS
            DEFENSE:1 SACK, 0 INT, 0 FUMBLES CAUSED, 0 TDS


THATS ALL TO SAY , SAVE THIS REPORT AND CHECK IT AFTER THE GAME (YOULL BE
AMAZED BY THE PREDICTIONS I HAVE MADE)

BARKLEY,ERVING,RANDALL,BARNETT,BOL        RULE THE ATHLETIC WORLD!!!!!!
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Can Bills go 16-0?
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Distribution: york
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1992 23:09:20 GMT

In article <1992Oct2.165428.9314@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca> fredg@ariel.yorku.ca (Fredrick Gonsalves) writes:
>
>HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>
>Very funny the Bills will Kill the FISH!!!
>
>
>FredG
>YorkU, Canada
>
How is a Canadian a Bill fan, or better yet, WHY?  Remember, JAWS? They eat meat,
buffalo meat! :-) 
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "Fact are facts and will not disappear on account of 
   your likes."  -   Jawaharlal Nehru
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: GC.SUL@forsythe.stanford.edu (Sullivan)
Subject: crowd noise again
Organization: Stanford University, California, USA
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 17:22:30 GMT

Interesting contrast.

Niners vs Saints (great game all around, I feel sorry for you Saints
fans who have to root for Hebert.  The rest of your team is a class
act - championship calibre team.)  All week before, the Niners were
worried about noise in the dome - even Center and Guards can't hear
QB snap count, they got to play off the ball.  Many times, the
result was Saints backers getting a better jump on the snap than
the offensive line.  Anyway, there was no mention of crowd noise
rule in that game, no attempt by the Niners to get the refs to quiet
them down, even in crucial situations.

Raiders vs Chiefs.  Raiders can't hear snap count because of crowd
noise.  Marin. steps out, Refs warn the crowd a couple times that
they'd lose time out for their team.  Shottenheimer tries to quiet
crowd.

Is Arrowhead louder than the Superdome?  C'mon Raiders, you don't
need to play in the LA Mausoleum in order to throw interceptions.


Is there any sense to the stupid crowd noise rule?  It's been a
while since I've seen it in action, but it seems teams should be
able to anticipate it, put up with it and let the fans be fans.

(put 'em in jail for throwing things on field however).

Mike
From: chf0@harvey.gte.com (Curtis Fennell)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Miami vs Seattle Stats
Date: 29 Sep 92 13:36:46 GMT
Organization: GTE Laboratories

Reprinted without permission from USA Today:

Final Score:  Miami 19 - Seattle 17

Scoring by Quarters

Miami	   3  3  3  10  --  19
Seattle	   0 10  0   7  --  17

                      Miami   Seattle
First Downs		18	14
Rushing			 4	 7
Passing			13	 7
Penalty			 1	 0

3d down efficiency	7-16	4-13
4th down efficiency	1-1	0-1

Total Net Yards		320	221
Total Plays		68	57
Average Gain		4.7	3.9

Net Yards Rushing	59	86
Rushes			26	24
Average Per Rush	2.3	3.6

Net Yards Passing	261	135
Completed-Attempted	25-40	16-28
Yards per Pass		6.2	4.1
Sacked-yards lost	2-17	5-31
Had intercepted		2	1

Punts-Average		3-38	5-43
Return Yardage		121	213
Punts-Returns		2-18	2-14
Kickoffs-Returns	3-85	5-97

Penalties-Yards		4-14	5-35
Fumbles-Lost		2-2	2-1

Time of Possession	31:53	28:07

Individual Stats

Miami Rushing		No	Yds	Avg	TDs
	Higgs		21	54	2.6	0
	Humphrey	4	7	1.8	0
	Martin		1	-2     -2.0	0

Seattle Rushing	
	Warren		13	47	3.6	0
	Stouffer	3	27	9.0	0
	JL Williams	7	13	1.9	1
	Mayes		1	-1     -1.0	0

Passing		     Comp-Att-Yds-Int-Td
	Marino	       24-39-260-2-1
	Mitchell	1-1-18-0-0
	Stouffer       16-28-166-1-1

Miami Receiving		No	Yds
	Paige		8	71
	Martin		5	72
	Duper		3	47
	Edmunds		3	35
	Banks		2	23
	Humphrey	3	19
	Higgs		1	11

Seattle Receiving
	Clark		4	61
	Warren		4	49
	D.Thomas	3	24
	J.L.Williams	2	11
	Jones		1	10
	Mayes		1	 7
	P.Green		1	 4

Miami Defense	Tackles-Assists-Sacks
	J.Williams	7-2-0
	Offerdahl	5-3-0
	Klingbeil	5-2-1
	Griggs		4-0-2
	Vincent		4-0-0
	Grimsley	3-4-0
	Cox		3-0-2
	JB Brown	3-0-0
	Oliver		2-1-0
	Hollier		2-1-0
	Sander		2-0-0
	Humphrey	2-0-0
	Green 		2-0-0
	Oglesby		1-1-0
	Coleman		1-1-0
	Higgs		1-0-0
	Marino		1-0-0  (HA!)
	Alexander	1-0-0
	Hobley		1-0-0
	Cross		1-0-0
	Jensen		0-1-0
	Saxon		0-1-0
	Jackson		0-1-0

Seattle Defense	Tackles-Assists-Sacks
	Wooden		7-2-0
	Wyman		7-1-0
	E.Robinson	6-1-0
	Porter		5-2-0
	Glasgow		5-2-0
	Hunter		5-1-0
	Kennedy		3-1-0
	Dodge		3-0-1
	Woods		2-3-0
	Cain		2-0-0
	R.Robinson	2-0-0
	Nash		1-1-1
	Rodgers		1-1-0
	Kasay		1-0-0
	Frank		1-0-0	
	Johnson		1-0-0
	Spitulski	1-0-0
	Heller		1-0-0
	JL Williams	1-0-0
	Bryant		0-2-0
	Stephens	0-1-0
	Harper		0-1-0

Interceptions
	Miami		Cox	1-0
	Seattle		Harper	1-41
			Wooden	1-3

--
Curt "I always pick the Dolphins - even against Buffalo!"  Fennell
			DOLFAN in New England.             
'72 Dolphins - The perfect team in the perfect season - 17-0



-- 
Curt "I always pick the Dolphins - even against Buffalo!"  Fennell
			DOLFAN in New England.             
'72 Dolphins - The perfect team in the perfect season - 17-0
From: hades@coos.dartmouth.edu (Hades)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Will "Prime Time" be playing this Sunday?
Date: 1 Oct 92 19:46:29 GMT
Reply-To: hades@Dartmouth.Edu
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Disclaimer: Personally, I really don't care who you think I speak for.
Moderator: Rec.Arts.Comics.Info

hm00@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (HOWARD JAY MILLER) writes:

>Is the Neon one going to play this Sunday against the Packers?  I know that
>the baseball playoffs are starting on Tuesday in Atlanta, would the Braves
>insists that Deion is well rested for it?

    He is supposed to play. Of course this is assuming he can walk after
the Braves game last night, the one tonight, and the double header
tomorrow, not to mention having meetings/practice all week for the
Falcons. ;-> Although this is suppoed to be his last game with the
Falcons until after the playoffs and World Series (assuing the Braves
make it that far).

--
-Hades (Brian V. Hughes) 
   "You know Television has gone to hell when, with every commercial,
	 you find yourself hoping to see the Energizer Bunny."
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: pc0837@sarah.albany.edu (COHEN PAUL L)
Subject: Re: Buffalo Broncos will lose!
Organization: State University of New York at Albany
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 92 12:27:58 GMT

In article <BvGv3y.GnC@acsu.buffalo.edu> v069qqqc@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Mike C.) writes:
>In article <1992Oct1.175433.3573@contel0.com>, billp@contel0.com (William H. Papazian - Data Engineering) writes...
>> 
>>All this talk of the Bills going undefeated is a joke. Let's
>>see, they played three really bad teams and they looked 
>      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>pretty good.  Big deal.  I will guarantee that the Buffalo
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>Broncos will lose to the Dolphins -- my prediction is below:
>> 
>
>So Miami has played 3 really bad teams and looked damn shitty. What's
>your point?
>
>(BTW, invoking the same logic you used to rename the Bills the
>'Buffalo Broncos', I propose we start calling your team the 
>'Miami Browns'.)
>
>:-)
>
>Mike 

Great point Mike!!!!  
Also BTW sais that guarantees the Dolphins will win.  The last person to
make a similar gaurantee: Bruce Coslet before San Fran dominated the Jets.

Let's face facts: 
     1) Both teams can score
     2) Neither team has a pass defense
     3) The Bills are a second half team

Prediction:  Halftime  Fins  17
                       Bills 14

             Final     Fins  27
                       Bills 42
From: deguc@holein1.Corp.Sun.COM (Bob Deguc)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
Subject: Re: Marinovich and the Raiders
Date: 1 Oct 1992 18:45:48 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: deguc@holein1.Corp.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: holein1.corp.sun.com

In article JEz@encore.com, dtodd@wizard.encore.com (Donald Todd) writes:
> Has anybody heard and rumors/facts about Todd Marinovich?  After his
> terrible performance, I was wondering if he will be starting this
> weekend.
> 
> -Don Todd
> 

Funny you should bring this up.  I heard on the radio this morning that
the Silver & Black has resigned Vince Evans.


Are they that desperate?


Bob De Guc
Bills fan in *ANY* Country!!




Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.pro
From: jpglori@srv.PacBell.COM (John P. Gloria)
Subject: Re: Dolphins win a big one...
Organization: Pacific * Bell
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 03:02:29 GMT

In article <BvMFBw.7zF@acsu.buffalo.edu> evans@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Doug Evans - CIT Network Operations) writes:
>In article <BvMEu2.7q3@acsu.buffalo.edu>, evans@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Doug Evans - CIT Network Operations) writes...
>>Some comments from today's game:
>
>There was one other thing I forgot to mention:
>
>When Stoyanavich went for the second field goal, I fully expected to 
>see the Bills pull out all the stops and go for the block. (Remember
>the 77 second miracle?)
>
>We still had nearly a full quarter to play, and if Kelly gets on the
>mark, we could get back in it.
>
IF!  IF!  IF! They MIGHT PULLLL THISSS ONE OUTTT!   NOT! :-)
>
>So what do they do? They pull the outside rushers (our speed guys)
>back from the line! They were not going to put on a rush, and at
>that point the Tegger and myself went absolutely berserk.
>
Hey, did Tegger choke on his hot dog? :-)
>
>What in the fuck is going through the coaches minds sometimes? I
>mean, what...Miami is up by 3 touchdowns and they might go for
>the fake FG? Give me a break!
>
>Things like this make me feel as though the coaches don't have a
>handle on the game. A blocked FG is just what the Bills needed
>at that point. I JUST CAN'T BELIEVE THEY DIDN'T GO FOR IT! GOD!
>
>
>*sigh*
>
>Doug

Your only consolation is that the Bills did not lose by 3 points
or less.  I mean, they got steam rolled and slapped around by
the 97 lb weaklings who were out of the water.
-- 
  ---------  John Gloria - jpglori@sysengr.pacbell.com	--------	
  "Fact are facts and will not disappear on account of 
   your likes."  -   Jawaharlal Nehru