HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ckalin@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Christopher Allen Kalin)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: The Devil's Messenger
Date: 13 Oct 1992 17:17:16 GMT
Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Distribution: world
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
Originator: ckalin@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

I believe the movie you are referring to is called "The Changeling".  I'm
pretty sure that the movie had George C. Scott in it, though I can't be sure.

Chris Kalin

Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: scarrobi@shearson.com (Steve Carrobis)
Subject: Re: UP
Reply-To: scarrobi@shearson.com
Organization: Lehman Brothers, Inc.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 13:39:45 GMT

In article 21240@bnr.ca, labiche@crchh561.BNR.CA (Maurice LaBiche) writes:
> you slime.  We use the kill-subject option of our newsreaders so
> we don't have to read dribble about whether so-and-so was a
> replicant.  Put some revealing information in your article
> subject headers so we netters who don't care about your rantings
> can skip them.  You suck.  You are the replicant but you weren't
> given much in the way of brains.  You're probably a SCHEMKSUX .000nothing.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Maurice LaBiche   |   labiche@bnr.ca 


i stand corrected ... this guy just put matt out of a job .. flame on boys ... 

---
Steve C. 

 ==> A wise man once told me - There ARE NO Wise Men !
                             - Just fools who think they are.
---------------------------------------------------------------		
 I understand you need someone to do work.
 I don't do work, but, I know this guy who does.
    -Vladimir Taltos
---------------------------------------------------------------

   	


Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: pejulaju@sandman.cs.hut.fi (Pentti Lajunen)
Subject: Re: RIDLEY SCOTT on the screen
Reply-To: pejulaju@niksula.hut.fi (Pentti Lajunen)
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 09:47:47 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.224106.23971@reed.edu> cramsay@nextweek.Reed.Edu (Celeste Ramsay) writes:
>I know it's really hard to find on video, but has anyone else seen this?

It was quite recently released on laserdisc letterboxed (it seemed to be shot
with soft-matte).

>I would say it is the best feature film by a first time director that I 
>have ever seen.

And it was prized as such in Cannes if I remember correctly.
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: Jari.Makela@hut.fi (Jari.Makela)
Subject: Re: Dust devil
Organization: One of these days I'm gonna get organisized.
	<1992Sep24.165038.26946@news2.cis.umn.edu>
	<1992Sep29.154359.2822@samba.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 13:00:43 GMT

>>>>> On 29 Sep 92 15:43:59 GMT, moore@gibbs.oit.unc.edu (Hall Moore) said:
>>>I read in a magazine called shivers that Richard Stanley, the man
>>>behind THE ultimate cult movie HARDWARE was about to release a film
>>>called Dust Devil.. 
>>>Does anyone know if it has been released??
>>>If it has been I would like to hear a few comparisons with the earlier
>>>_Hardware_ ....

Dust Devil was shot in Namibia and is about a spirit that lives in
human body and has to kill other people to get out of it in order to
go to some place where dust devils live happily thereafter.

The beginning is a straight rip off from Stanley's Hardware (which I
loved): A guy in a trench coat in desert walking. After that the film
is rip off of The Hitcher (the film that had Rutger Hauer in a trench
coat) with some supernatural blah blah blah added.

The story is clumsy and stupid and the film was a big bore. Nothing
like Hardware.

The music in this is also by Simon Boswell as in Hardware but even it
is boring enniomorriconeish crap this time.

Shame on you Mr. Stanley!

Jari
--
			   N||k{le Lubroz!
From: farant@terapin.com (Faran Thomason)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Valley Girl/Beyond The Valley Of The Dolls & Shatner/Nimoy...on CD?!
Date: 10 Oct 92 23:16:54 PST
Organization: BBS

How many folks out there have actually seen Beyond The Valley of The Dolls ??

This is the one Roger Ebert wrote and Russ Myers biggest budgeted film. It's
great. To bad fox wont release it on tape. It's pretty ridiculous. IT just got
rated NC-17(from X). However Basic Instinct featured more nudity and violence.
Maybe Roger Ebert is just embarrased and paid Fox not release it. If you can
find a copy(it was released on tape a long time ago) rent it or buy it.
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: rush2112@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Troy Hickman)
Subject: Re: GODZILLA VS KING KONG ????
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 23:23:44 GMT

In article <1992Oct7.195638.26265@news.columbia.edu>, dave@blackbox.cc.columbia.edu (David Milner) writes:
> 
> In article <1992Oct7.113356.59499@cc.usu.edu> slb3y@cc.usu.edu (Punk Rocketeer) writes:
> >In article <1992Oct7.133030.23167@shearson.com>, scarrobi@shearson.com
> >(Steve Carrobis) writes:
> >> there was also another one where king kong went against i robot of himself ...
> >
> >     Yes.  It was called (drum roll please) KING KONG VS. GODZILLA. 
> >Or maybe the title was the same as that of this thread.  GODZILLA VS.
> >MECHAGODZILLA (who was also known as the Cosmic Monster and the Bionic
> >Monster, depending on the ad/time/channel) is a different movie
> >altogether.
> >
> >     G v KK had two endings, from what I've heard.  One for Japanese
> >audiences, and one for American.  Guess who wins in each one.
> >-- 
> >Patrick S. Clark | "We are not in the Eighth Dimension.
> >Email is life!   |  We are over New Jersey.  All is not lost."
> >Usual disclaimer | --Unidentified red Lectroid announcer
> 
> The film with MechaKong in it is KING KONG ESCAPES, and not KING KONG
> VS. GODZILLA.
> 
> The Japanese and American endings of KING KONG VS. GODZILLA are the
> same - Kong wins in both. How do I know? I have them both on tape.
> 
> 
> 
> David Milner  Columbia University
> inet:   dave@blackbox.cc.columbia.edu
> usenet: ...rutgers!columbia!blackbox!dave
>         ...rutgers!columbia!blackbox.cc.columbia.edu!dave
> 




Y'know, years ago when I first heard the the "two endings" bit was just a
rumor, it made me rather sad. I hated to think that the only version of the
film had Kong winning. Oh, well; you mature, you learn to deal with the 
outcome of giant monster battles.


Troy "I never saw the zipper" Hickman
rush2112@mace.cc.purdue.edu
>
From: kuchar@buast7.bu.edu (Tom Kuchar)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: RIDLEY SCOTT on the screen
Date: 9 Oct 92 14:10:06 GMT
Organization: Astronomy Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

In article <1992Oct8.170920.1440@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> marulanda@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu writes:
>P.S.
>What has Ridley Scott done after 1982?

	Legend, Black Rain (the Michael Douglas movie), and Thelma & Louise


>What year did Alien come out? 
  
	1979 (wow! that long ago)



-- 
Tom Kuchar			  
kuchar@buast7.bu.edu		  -or-                      kuchar@plh.af.mil
Department of Astronomy                              Phillips Laboratory/GPOB
Boston Univerity		                                  Hanscom AFB
From: shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Casino Royale
Date: 13 Oct 92 19:57:12 GMT
Reply-To: shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.


This film has some truly hysterical moments although it does drag 
in places. Woody Allen as little Jimmy Bond just cracks me up !
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: st902282@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
Subject: Re: Brazil
Reply-To: st902282@pip.cc.brandeis.edu
Organization: Brandeis University
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 19:22:23 GMT

A couple of years ago, when Brazil was first broadcast on t.v., and they
butchered the film, I heard that Gilliam (the director) actually sued them.
I don't know what the outcome was, but I found it very interesting.
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: chiuf@woods.ulowell.edu
Subject: sneaker
Organization: University of Lowell
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:25:00 GMT

I recently saw a movie named "sneaker". In which Robert Reford play as a
computer expert and construct a very smart break-in team to test the 
security system of big organization. In that movie, it also point out that
the current world is controlled by the computer information system. Many 
unknown access of the "headquater" can really win the game of the world
economy. So, do you think that is possible?

Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (ce)
Subject: Re: Winnie the Pooh as 6th Replicant doesn
Organization: Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum GmbH, Hamburg
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 08:29:17 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.121922.27651@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu> bchurch@oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu (Robert Church) writes:
>In article <1992Oct7.132233.22960@shearson.com> scarrobi@shearson.com writes:
>>guys i figured it out ... they were all real(winnie,tigger,et al)! .. the real replicant was ...
>>CHRISTOPHER ROBBIN!!!!!!!
>
>But don't forget about the episode where piglet finds a tribe that worships
>his likeness. Does this mean that piglet is a replicant or is he the 'original'
>and they were modeled after him. I'm trying to find the definitive book'Do 
>pooh-bears dream of fluff and stuff' to find Milnes ideas on this. Makes
>your hair sort of stand up on end doesn't it?
>
Only the short ones...

You silly old bears...

*******************************************************************************
*  "Supernatural, perhaps...Baloney, perhaps not" - Bela Lugosi               *
*******************************************************************************
Matt Marchese	    The opinions expressed here are not those of my employer, *
Cray Research  	    my wife, my church, or myself...But they are the opinions *
DKRZ                of Elvis as revealved to me through the medium of my pet  *
Hamburg, Germany    hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...                             *
*******************************************************************************
From: mccreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com (Ed McCreary)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Please Help
Date: 8 Oct 92 15:59:31 GMT
Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.

In article <16300002@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com> kingsley@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Kingsley Morse) writes:
>              Please answer these 9 questions and return.
>

Is there a newsgroup this guy *hasn't* posted this to?  It's
*everywhere*!!

--
In the midst of the word he was trying to say,|McCreary@sword.eng.hou.compaq.com
     In the midst of his laughter and glee,   |Me, speak for Compaq?  
He had softly and suddenly vanished away---   |Yeah, right.
     For the Snark *was* a Boojum, you see.   |#include <stddisclaimer.h>
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: donnell@manowar.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Subject: Re: the absolute worst movie of all time,
Organization: none
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 14:53:43 GMT

In article <machala.718908107@delphi> machala@spdc.ti.com (Chuck Machala) writes:
>kjm@buc.edu.au (Kevin Moore) writes:
>
>>In article <1992Oct7.132706.23029@shearson.com> scarrobi@shearson.com (Steve Carrobis) writes:
>
>>> what was that 3-d flick .. something across the forbidden xone ... with 
>>Richard Mull
>
>>Spacehunters: Adventures in the Forbidden Zone? 
>
>>I'm not sure whether my headache was due to the 3-D or the plot, such as it 
>>was... 
>
>FOR THE LAST TIME PEOPLE. THE ABSOLUTE WORST MOVIE OF ALL TIMES IS
>                        "The Giant Claw"
>IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME CHECK IT OUT. YOU WILL THEN BE A BELIEVER.
>
>
>--
>
>     Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me.
>
>Chuck Machala-Semiconductor Process and Design Center-Texas Instruments/Dallas

Since we are now just screaming our choices for this:

THE GIANT CLAW IS A TENDER, WELL MADE, FEEL-GOOD FILM ABOUT HUMAN HOPES AND
DESIRES FIGHTING TO TAME NATURE. AT, LEAST IN COMPARISON TO THE ULTIMATE
CINEMATIC PUSBUBBLE-MALIBU HIGH!

I recommend that each and every one of you rush out and rent this stinkbomb.
"Malibu High" will redefine your definition of a "Bad movie" and put an
end to this argument.

Safe, when used as directed.

					--Judex--
From: ss@wpi.WPI.EDU (Scott Streeter)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: RIDLEY SCOTT on the screen
Date: 9 Oct 92 07:24:34
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609-2280
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu
In-reply-to: marulanda@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu's message of 8 Oct 92 21:09:20 GMT

>>>>> On 8 Oct 92 21:09:20 GMT, marulanda@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu said:

marulanda> What has Ridley Scott done after 1982?
marulanda> What year did Alien come out? 

Alien came out in '79
--
 Scott Streeter                             Keeper of the Star Wars Archive
 ss@wpi.wpi.edu                             wpi.wpi.edu        130.215.24.1
Xref: sparky alt.cult-movies:9149 rec.arts.sf.movies:7937
From: mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Markus Stumptner)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies,rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: GODZILLA VS. BIOLLANTE
Date: 16 Oct 92 13:11:18 GMT
Organization: DB and ES Subdivision, TU Vienna

From article <seaverw.43.0@columbia.dsu.edu>, by seaverw@columbia.dsu.edu (W. A. Seaver):
> In article <1992Oct15.020328.14203@news.columbia.edu> dave@blackbox.cc.columbia.edu (David Milner) writes:
>>[Biollante] is the result of the combination of
>>cells from a rose, a human girl and Godzilla.
 
> You have GOT to be kidding.

I think you haven't seen enough Godzilla films.

-- 
Markus Stumptner                                mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
University of Technology Vienna                 vexpert!mst@relay.eu.net
Paniglg. 16, A-1040 Vienna, Austria             ...mcsun!vexpert!mst
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: pete@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au (Peter Alexander Merel)
Subject: Re: Winnie the Pooh as 6th Replicant doesn't hold water
Organization: AOTC - CSSC
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 05:52:52 GMT

k206027@smog.DKRZ-Hamburg.DE (ce) writes:
>In article <16877B4AA.SDENARO@vm.poly.edu> SDENARO@vm.poly.edu writes:
>>In the DC it becomes clear that even though he is not the "Sixth" Replicant.
>>Both Scott and Dick imply that Winne is a replicant.
>> 
>But what about the scene where Eeyore leaves the tiny origami Tigger in
>Winnie's treehouse?

I believe that was actually an origami heffalump. Anyhow, Pooh could not have 
been a replicant. You remember the scene where Piglet crushes Christopher
Robin's eyes and then finishes off owl? Well, if you look carefully you 
will notice the words "Plz ring if answr reqd / Plz knoke if no answr reqrd" 
in the lift outside. That was Scott's way of being ambiguous. Not many people
understand that.

-- 
Internet: pete@cssc-syd.tansu.com.au   UUCP: {uunet,mcvax}!munnari!cssc-syd!pete
Snail: 1/18-20 Orion Road, Lane Cove NSW 2066 Australia    Phone: +61 2 911 3130
I am a big pond in a small fish.
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: Thorsten_Kitz@mk.maus.de (Thorsten Kitz)
Subject: Re: The worst movie of all tim
Organization: Mausnet
X-Gateway: MausGate/Mail 1.14
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 23:02:00 +0000

Hey Joe,

Joe Stremick wrote on Wed. 10-07-1992 at 23:17 in alt.cult-movies:

JS> >The PG13 rating requires children under thirteen to be accompanied by a
JS> >parent...supposedly so the parent can explain the confusing parts.
JS>
JS> Minor adjustment here:  PG-13 does not *require* children under 13 to
JS> be accompanied by parents.  It merely recommends that "some material
JS> may no be appropriate for children under 13."

It was my mistake, read my message to Kurt.

Bye for now,

Thorsten.
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally)
Subject: Re: Darkman
Reply-To: shiv@bnr.ca (Shiv Naimpally)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 17:18:05 GMT

I just watched Darkman again on video and it is a fun movie. Don't take
anything in it too seriously (eg. his girlfriend falling and getting her
handcuffs caught on steel tubing) - the whole thing is meant to be very
comic book-ish. The special effects are a bit too hokey , but again this
could be because he was trying for a comic book type of feel and didn't
want overly great FXs.
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: wbg@mtek.com (W. Brewster Gillett)
Subject: Re: The worst movie of all tim
Reply-To: brew@mtek.com
Organization: MTEK International, Inc.
Distribution: all
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 23:37:19 GMT

Thorsten_Kitz@mk.maus.de (Thorsten Kitz) writes:

>Hey there,

>in my opinion, the absolut worst movie ever seen is "Top Gun". In Germany it
>was rated as PG-12 (the same as PG-13, but from 12 years on) and it is
>very violently, even more than a stupid horror film. If I can remember the
>film correct (I am not sure, cause I was very shocked when I have seen it),
>first they shoot some Russians into the nirwana, make a big party, than
>someone from the Americans was shot and the Russians were the "Bad, bad boys".
>I think, movies like this one, are very dangerous for children, because, they
>get a wrong view of the real world. I would rate the film R, if I would have
>the decisions, even better, put the movie into the rubbish container.

>Bye for now,

>Thorsten.

Come now, Herr Kitz. Most movies, and almost all TV, send a "wrong" view of
the world to children, as well as to the rest of us. If we were to consign
all movies to the rubbish for presenting a distorted world-view, the
available cinema would decrease by orders of magnitude. 

I'll thank you not to propose throwing any movies into the rubbish. People
view movies for a variety of reasons, and not all viewers are seeking or
satisfied by the same things. "Top Gun" had a forgettable plot, and worse
dialogue, but the aviation camera-work was spectacular. Those of us (and we
are _legion_, Herr Kitz!) who derive high pleasure from the visual elements
of the cinema experience are able to enjoy that portion without getting all
bound up in the other elements which may not suit us. 

The world is not a perfectible place; humankind even less so. Let us cease
the incessant and by now discredited efforts to sanitize and make risk-free
every possible aspect of existence. Such efforts are clearly foredoomed to
failure, and we can all collectively lead much happier lives once we come to
realize this. I will badly quote Kant, since I don't have the reference
close by .....

"Out of such crooked timber as Man is built, nothing entirely straight can
ever be made."

I believe Kant to be more a realist than a cynic .... your thoughts?

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
brew@mtek.com
MTEK International, Inc.             Throughput Technology Corp.
Throughput!
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: donnell@manowar.micro.umn.edu (Your Heinous)
Subject: Re: Most SHOCKING film in my childhood
Organization: none
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 15:06:13 GMT

In article <1992Oct12.171038.28815@digi.lonestar.org> emartine@digi.lonestar.org (Edgar Martinez Martinez) writes:
>
> One of the best scares that I've ever gotten was in a movie that I saw back
>when I lived in Mexico. It was called "El Mensajero del Diablo" (The Devil's
>Messenger), I'm sure that's not the original title. The scariest scene in my
>opinion was when the guy takes this baseball(?) that he keeps finding all over
>the house, and throws it to a huge river from a bridge over it. He drives home
>and when he opens the door, the ball comes bouncing down the stairs. It was one
>of the best adrenaline(?) rushes I've ever gotten, scared the hell out of me.
>It wasn't one of those BOO! scares that take you by surprise, it was just
>shocking during the whole scene!
>
> Anybody remember the name of the movie? Supposedly, an invalid kid had been
>drowned in his tub, and his ghost was still haunting the house. Anybody
>remember the title of it?
>
>
>
>Edgar Martinez                UTArlington Co-op program (Great!)
>emartine@digi.lonestar.org    DSC Communications Corp.  Plano, TX
>b645zju@utarlg.uta.edu        University of Texas at Arlington
>"My bathroom fan goes out straight into my living room"

Sounds kind of like "Kill Baby Kill/Curse Of The Living Dead", but that
was about a young girl who had died. It had really creepy scenes with
bouncing balls that gave me the creeps as a kid.
Is this out on video?

					--Judex--

Xref: sparky alt.cult-movies:9137 rec.arts.sf.movies:7929
From: seawasp@vm2.cis.pitt.edu (Sea Wasp)
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies,rec.arts.sf.movies
Subject: Re: GODZILLA VS. BIOLLANTE
Keywords: Godzilla Biollante Japan Monster
Date: 16 Oct 92 13:25:57 GMT
Followup-To: alt.cult-movies
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
Originator: seawasp@unixd2.cis.pitt.edu

In article <seaverw.43.0@columbia.dsu.edu> seaverw@columbia.dsu.edu (W. A. Seaver) writes:
>In article <1992Oct15.020328.14203@news.columbia.edu> dave@blackbox.cc.columbia.edu (David Milner) writes:
>>She - yes, Biollante is female - is the result of the combination of
>>cells from a rose, a human girl and Godzilla.

>You have GOT to be kidding.

-------------    SPOILERS     -----------------















	Nope, he's telling the truth. Godzilla left scales and such lying
around after his battle with the Super-X combat craft (in Godzilla 1985).
Several groups got hold of these radiation-using cells (which regenerated
like nobody's business), including one expert geneticist. He was trying
to analyze the functioning of the monster, partly by splicing Godzilla's
genes with other creatures. When his daughter died, he used some of her
cells, those of her favorite flower (the rose) and Godzilla in his next
experiment. That night, there was a firefight in the lab, and what was
supposed to be a contained experiment got released.

	To be honest, Biollante is the stupidest-looking monster I have
ever seen, and if it played a MAJOR role in the film I wouldn't like it.

	Godzilla Vs Biolante is very much worth watching (assuming you 
like monster movies) mainly because of the production values. They blow
your mind when compared with those of ALL other such productions. Godzilla
no longer looks funny -- he's lost a lot of that clumsiness and the cute
puppydog eyes he used to have. 'Zilly now looks MEAN, with the power and
awesome presence such an elemental force OUGHT to have. The battles with
Godzilla versus man's forces -- battleships, the Super-X2 (which is also
much more impressive, not silly-looking), ground forces -- now look
almost real instead of being painfully fake.

	If they kept this kind of production level, I'm REALLY looking
forward to Gojira vs Tai Gidorah  (Godzilla vs King Gidrah)!

                                 Sea Wasp
                                   /^\
                                   ;;;

Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies
From: "peter dougherty" <peter.dougherty@canrem.com>
Subject: the rocky horror picture
Reply-To: "peter dougherty" <peter.dougherty@canrem.com>
Organization: Canada Remote Systems
Distribution: alt
Date: 7 Oct 92 05:11:12 EST

To ACPS7035@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca

AC>  Newsgroup: alt.cult-movies
  > Message-ID: <92276.235729ACPS7035@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>
  >    Subject: The Rocky Horror Picture Show Script

AC>Greetings

AC>I was wondering if anyone out there had a copy of the Rocky Horror Picture
  >Show script.  I would like a copy.
  >Thank you.

Sean, 'tis your lucky day!  I have the Audience Participation Script in
WP51 format, which I just re-edited.  Call me voice at 234-5826 before noon,
and I'll send it to you via modem.  If you don't have access to WP51, I can
send it out as ASCII if you'd prefer.

Hope to catch you at the Bloor next time 'round!
---
  SLMR 2.1a  ...well, it's got `SOME' rat in it...
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies