HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu (John H. Kim)
Subject: Re: A movie version of Les Mis???
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 07:52:23 GMT

jt3h+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jeremy Matthew Toeman) writes:

>It is said to be being released in 1993. I have heard that Colm Wilkinson
>and Rebecca Caine will be in it, but that is a rumor.

The film version of Les Miserables is on the back burner for the moment.
Also cast was Monique Wilson who took over the role of Miss Saigon in
London after Lea Salonga left for Broadway.  She was to play Eponine.
I got this information from a very reliable source, Monique's boyfriend
who I went to film school with.  Look for Monique in the film version of
Miss Saigon and at your music stores singing a duet from Miss Saigon with
Barbara Streisand.  More news as I get it!

using my brother's account, Virginia
-- 
John H. Kim                 | (This space to be filled when I
jokim@jarthur.claremont.edu | think of something very clever 
uunet!jarthur!jokim         | to use as a disclaimer)
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27690 rec.arts.tv.uk:5445
From: gharris@jade.tufts.edu (George W. Harris)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,rec.arts.tv.uk
Subject: Re: Marx brothers: a question
Date: 14 Sep 92 19:26:17 GMT
Organization: Tufts University - Medford, MA
Originator: gharris@jade.tufts.edu

In article <1992Sep14.151120.23377@pixel.kodak.com> dj@ekcolor (Dave Jones) writes:
>RIPBC@CUNYVM.BITNET () writes:
>: I wonder if anyone can help me with the following query.  There is a short
>: dialogue which goes (roughly) as folows:
>: 
>: The MB are looking for something, perhaps a treasure and someone suggests
>: that it may be in the house next door.  At this, someone says "but there
>: IS no house next door" to which the response is, "then we will build one".
>: Which movie does this occur in and aproximately where?
>: 
>: Thanks much,
>: Rohit Parikh
>
>Sounds like Animal Crackers, which takes place in a mansion and involves
>a hunt for a missing painting.  I can't remember seeing anything like
>this in a Marx Brothers movie though, and I've seen most of them.

	It is Animal Crackers.  I remember seeing this scene.  This movie was
also the source of my previous .sig quote, If you take cranberries and stew 
them like applesauce, they taste more like prunes than rhubarb does.

>
>--
>||)) Those who wallow in ignorance      ))) Policemen are numbered in case))|
>||)) must dwell in Limbaugh for a time  ))) they get lost - S. Milligan   ))|
>||))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))|
>||Dave Jones (dj@ekcolor.ssd.kodak.com) | Eastman Kodak Co. Rochester, NY   |

--
gharris@jade.tufts.edu          "She had ever chance for happiness, ever 
George W. Harris                chance in the world, and stomped ever one 
Dept. of Mathematics            of them chances down in the dirt like a 
Tufts University                bug."   _The Devil's Dream_
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: billones@grebyn.com (Jeremy Billones)
Subject: Re: Pretty Woman (was Re: Most Maddening Movie)
Organization: Grebyn Timesharing
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 13:05:51 GMT

In article <BD.92Sep6140021@fluent.UUCP> bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU writes:
>lewis@linac.fnal.gov (June Cummins Lewis) writes:
>>For me, the most maddening movie was the same as the most
>>embarrassing--Pretty Woman.  It just made sick that so many people
>>lapped up the story as if it were realistic and possible.  I don't
>
>I must have missed something.  When did anyone pretend this
>fairy tale was "realistic and possible"?

My sister does.  I think; we can never tell with her.

Jeremy Billones				billones@grebyn.stf
From: gdavis@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Grant R. Davis)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: STAR WARS SNEAKER
Date: 10 Sep 92 15:44:18 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX

In article <1992Sep8.140700.24420@jyu.fi> mol@jyu.fi (Mika O. Latokartano) writes:
>In article <matt.715911766@centerline.com> matt@centerline.com (Matt Landau) writes:
>>In <Bu1DHz.I5o@news.cso.uiuc.edu> rnmg1200@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (A Lady and her Walrus) writes:
>>>>In one of the battle scenes in one of the starwars movies when they're
>>>>showing the armada I've heard a rumor that one of the ships is actually
>>>>a sneaker
>>
>>>It's in Return of the Jedi. 
>>
>>No, it isn't.  It's a myth.  You can discover this by going down to
>(stuff deleted)
>>closely in stop-action, it's clearly just a ship.

>  Surprising.  I remember reading about this from a book "The Magic of
>  ILM" or something (rather big book, lots of nice photos).  An effects
>  person from the ILM said there actually is a sneaker.  What gives?

Well, I finally saw the sneaker last night. If someone from ILM says it's
a sneaker, it probably is.
I wonder if Nike paid for product placement? :)


Grant Davis
gdavis@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu

"This is good[beer]. Remind me to take this world."-Lost Destiny


Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: johnson@spectra.com (boyd johnson)
Subject: Re: most embarassing movie
Organization: Spectragraphics Corporation
Distribution: rec
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 92 18:08:24 GMT

In article <1992Sep8.1414.31854@execnet> "tom betz" <tom.betz@execnet.com> writes:
>Quoth Mike Haskell regarding MOST EMBARASSING MOVIE on 09-08-92:
>
>MH> What is the most embarassing movie you have ever seen?

I don't know about embarassing, but the movie I came closest to walking
out in disgust because of the stupidity I saw on screen was "Born on the
Fourth of July".
It was at the scene where Cruise and DaFoe were cripples stranded out
on the Mexican desert to die and all they could think of to do was spit
at each other.

-- 
======== Boyd Johnson    nosc!spectra.com!johnson  San Diego, Ca. ========
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher)
Subject: Re: Upcoming Stephen King Movie (was: Pet Sematary 2)
Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 16:16:12 GMT

In article <1992Sep8.224517.10028@cs.ucla.edu> reiher@ficus.cs.ucla.edu (Peter Reiher) writes:
(Hey, that's me!)
>
>A film version of "Needful Things" is in the works.  All I remember,
>off the top of my head, is that Ed Harris and Max von Sydow star.

More information fromm Variety.  Bonnie Bedelia will also appear in
it.  The director is Fraser Heston, Charlton Heston's son.  The younger
Heston has directed a few films - "Motherload" (a rotten mining film
with his dad) and a recent TV version of "Treasure Island" (a pretty
good adaptation, also with his dad).  The script will be written by
W.D. Richter, best known as the screenwriter for "Buckaroo Banzai".

--
		Peter Reiher
		reiher@wells.cs.ucla.edu

From: myron@hpwrce.mayfield.hp.com (Myron Cox)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 20:48:49 GMT
Subject: Re: "Dead Again" question
Organization: the HP Mtn.View Resp. Cntr.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies


There's one scene that still confuses me in "Dead Again."

Who did Strauss kill in the prison hallway with the scissors after he
whispered (or kissed) the reporter?  Was this just a dream sequence?

It's the only loose end that I can't tie up in this movie.

Thanks,
Myron
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: jpehko@cs.joensuu.fi (Juha Pehkonen)
Subject: Re: A question about Die Hard
Organization: University of Joensuu
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 11:53:52 GMT

jsd@daimi.aau.dk (Jacob Steen Due) writes:

>contries). Quite a few people was upset as the series was rerun because a scene
>was missing !! Only the scene (which many people recalled very well - they even
>recalled the dialouge) was never shot. Not even the director could convince
>people that the scene was newer shown in the "original" !

>Such is the power of human imagination, that people recalled a scene that was
>never shown !

Play it again, Sam :-)

Juha Pehkonen
jpehko@cs.joensuu.fi

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: marck@nwu.edu (Jater & Co.)
Subject: Later, Tony Perkins
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Organization: NU ACNS
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 14:59:07 GMT


My father was Tony Perkins' college drama instructor.  Dad used to regale
me with stories of getting rid of all of Tony's bad acting habits:  Tony
just couldn't keep his hands at his sides, so Dad took his belt off and
secured his arms to his sides.  Tony walked around on stage with his hands
constantly in his pockets, so Dad had Mom sew up his pockets to cut off
that option for stage action.

Before Tony graduated from Rollins College, he got offers to work in
Shakespearean theater up in New York.  Few people know of this man's talent
for Shakespeare -- for much of the classic repertoire, in fact.  Dad and he
discussed it and he decided to go for the chance to make it in New York. 
While he was there, he called Dad and told him that he had been offered a
screen test for a movie shooting out in L.A., to be directed by one Alfred
Hitchcock.  And the rest, as they say ...

... is somewhat disturbed history.  Tony's role in _Psycho_ pretty much
ruined his career for any other role that *wasn't* an evil character.  He
was never able to shake that character.  It's my guess that his prepared
statement, released after his death, indicated how angry he was at what he
referred to as the "cutthroat" film industry, and how his battle with AIDS
had taught him so much more about compassion and selflessness than all his
years in show business.  This was an angry man.

As to how he got the HIV virus -- honestly, we'll never know.  Tony had
homosexual relationships before and during his marriage, but he was also a
frequent drug user.  Honestly, he could have picked up the virus from
either homosexual or heterosexual contact, or from intravenous drug use. 
Talking about how he got it seems to miss the point.

There was no question in my family's mind that Tony loved his family
dearly.  The one time that I met him, when he returned to Winter Park,
Florida, to receive an honorary degree from Rollins and to promote _Psycho
2_, he spent an afternoon with us and talked almost nonstop about them.  He
talked little, if at all, about the continuation of the _Psycho_ series.  I
think he hated having to do those films, but realized that it was a way to
make a living.  He much preferred serious theater to these B movies.

His two sons, Elvis and Oswald (the latter named after Tony's father, a
great stage actor in the first part of this century), are in their teens
and i hear that one of them is pursuing a theater career.


mlb

*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+* marck@nwu.edu +*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+
m l bailey                           || Zorg: "I don't see the connection
flagrant poseur                      ||        between demolition and 
northwestern university              ||        writing."
looking for wide open spaces         || Betty: "I'm not surprised."
high above the kitchen               ||
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: sfysh@epas.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Moskal Fysh)
Subject: This Newsgroup
Organization: University of Toronto - EPAS
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 20:46:47 GMT

In article <1992Sep5.045430.15666@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sorourke@lonestar.utsa.edu (Sean J. Orourke) writes:
>In article <1992Sep5.013622.3819@ee.ubc.ca> rsemenof@ee.ubc.ca (SEMENOFF ROBERT) writes:
>>In article <1992Sep4.180743.1@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu> bole@hmivax.humgen.upenn.edu (Greg Bole) writes:
>>>In article <sbarnhar-040992151951@morril6t-10.micro.umn.edu>,
>>>sbarnhar@mailbox.mail.umn.edu (Dr. Barnhart) writes:
>>
>>>I'm so sick of being called a simp and a pretentious idiot because my friends
>>>and I enjoyed Barton Fink/Naked Lunch/Wild At Heart/Prospero's Books/etc.
>>
>>What about making rec.arts.movies into two newsgroups ?
>>(Has this been discussed before?)
>>
>>My killfile for this newsgroup is HUGE, and I still pick up
>>a high volume from threads on blockbusters and other junky movies.
>>Obviously there's a continuous range of tastes, but there seems
>>to be a distinct division between the 'art' films goers and
>>the Hollywood movie fans.
>>
>I've always thought that there should be a rec.arts.that.movie.that.just.-
>came.out.that.everyone.wants.to.discuss.to.death. :)
>
>Maybe rec.arts.movies and rec.movies?  rec.movies and rec.movies.art?

Isn't there an inactive rec.arts.cinema?  Seems to me that that would
be an appropriate place for discussion of less mainstream movies.

- Stephanie
(also sfysh@canrem.com)

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.tv.twin-peaks
From: lai@seas.gwu.edu (William Y. Lai)
Subject: Re: Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (*MAJOR SPOILERS*)
Organization: George Washington University
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1992 04:39:42 GMT

In article <kgmLqB2w165w@eisley.wa.com> ace@eisley.wa.com (Ace of Death) writes:
>There are seperate listings in the credits for each angel and neither one 
>is Laura. I believe that these are the angel that "left" Laura's picture 
>earlier on.  Laura "got her angel back" at the end with the help of 
>Cooper.  This includes the fore/back shadowing presence of Annie who 
>tells Laura to wright in her Diary, which Cooper finds and helps her.
>Yes I know it's confusing but that makes it great, IMHO.

Hmm, can you remind me how Cooper used the diary entry to help *her*, whoever
*her* is?


William
-- 
email: lai@seas.gwu.edu | "I want to do everything.  I want to have everything.
Dept. of Electrical Eng.|  I have a wonderful, wonderful life.  But there's so
George Washington Univ. |  much more out there.  Do I have it all?  Yes.  Do I
Washington, D.C.        |  want more?  Yeah, sure."     -Demi Moore        
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
From: gmark@cbnewse.cb.att.com (gilbert.m.stewart)
Subject: Re: Meg Ryan's nose
Organization: AT&T
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 13:52:38 GMT
Keywords: Nose, Nasal

In article <1992Sep6.225426.17818@news.iastate.edu> boylan@pi.eai.iastate.edu (Terran Boylan) writes:
>Anybody besides me notice that Meg Ryan scratches her
>nose in the same peculiar way (with the back of her
>hand) in the movies _When Harry Met Sally_, _Joe
>Versus the Volcano_ and _The Doors_.

She seems to have the same hair and same eye movement and walk, too.
Suppose she's played by the same actress in each of those?
Maybe John Lithgow?
>
>I just saw _Prelude To a Kiss_, and I didn't notice
>any nose-scratching there.  (I hope that's not a
>spoiler.)
>
Oh, great!  The great non-nose-scratch climax is pretty well
ruined, now!

GMS
From: murphy@npri6.npri.com (David P. Murphy)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Highlander III.
Date: 10 Sep 92 19:03:32 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: NPRI, Alexandria VA


>If they are going to do a third film they should base it on the ending of the
>first when Conor says that he can hear peoples thoughts and stuff. 
>
>michaell@cogs.susx.ac.uk (Michael Lazarou)

nah, they should base it somewhere in the sixteenth, seventeenth, eighteenth,
nineteenth, or early twentieth centuries when he's carousing with other 
immortals.  sure, we'll know he's gonna live (since it's a prequel),
but it would still be a much better movie than any sequel to HIGHLANDER
could ever be.  man, that movie _ended_.

ok
dpm
-- 
murphy@npri6.npri.com 602 Cameron St. Alexandria, VA 22314 (703) 683-9090

              When every one is dead the Great Game is finished.  Not before.
                              --- Hurree Babu, "Kim"
From: cb366@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mark B. Bendiksen)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Blade Runner, Director's Cut in Seattle
Date: 7 Sep 1992 19:19:58 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


gregs@polari.online.com writes

>I've seen this topic thread about a million times in this group, but I've
>never seen anything but "When does it come out?"  It looks like it's finally
>coming out, but only in Seattle for the time being.  Why?  I don't know.

No.....please understand that "exclusive engagement" does not
mean exclusive for the United States, but exclusive to the area
which you are in. Similarly, the director's cut is premiering
Sept. 11 in Dallas one theatre as an "exclusive engagement".
I'm sure it will be in most of the other major cities across
the country on the same date.

Mark B .Bendiksen
cb366@freenet.cwru.edu
-- 
"If we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto,
 We'll just be bogus, too."-- Dr. Jeff Spicolli
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: howells@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (John Howells)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: NASA Ames Res. Ctr. Mtn Vw CA 94035
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 92 15:05:40 GMT

chil@fraser.sfu.ca (Keith Lim) writes:

<<BMS111@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:

<>qquit
<^^^^^^
<Hmmm...never heard of this movie before. :)

It was a sequel to ZZ.

--
                                        John Howells
                                        howells@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov 
                                        howells@earth.arc.nasa.gov
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27419 alt.tv.twin-peaks:2794
From: floyd@maple.circa.ufl.edu (FLOYD)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.tv.twin-peaks
Subject: Re: Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me (*MAJOR SPOILERS*)
Date: 11 Sep 92 16:59:00 GMT
Reply-To: floyd@maple.circa.ufl.edu
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies
Organization: University of Florida - CIRCA

In article <9tmn8r+@lynx.unm.edu>, lazlo@triton.unm.edu (Lazlo Nibble) writes:
>kosts@ursa.calvin.edu (Steven Koster) writes:
>
>> No, no, no. The angels are not Laura, Annie, or anyone else we know.  
>
>I really hate to disappoint you, Steven, but you're *wrong*.  There's a
>still of the "angel-in-the-train-car" scene in the booklet of the soundtrack
>CD and it's definitely, unmistakably Laura.
>
>Go watch the movie again.
>
>--
>Lazlo (lazlo@triton.unm.edu)

Nope, Steven is right.  Stay and watch the ending credits of the movie.  The
two angels (one in the train car and the other in the red room) are played by
two actresses.  One is Lorin somebody and the other is Karin somebody.
By the way, the first time I saw the movie the guy in front of me had a Save
The Pine Weasel shirt.  When asked, he said that he got the address from
someone on this group.  Does anyone have that address?
Also does anyone know what the status is on the English laserdisc boxed set? 
If I save up enough money I'll buy that and a laserdisc player.
And about that Bowie bit, what exactly was he wearing?  Looked like a white
suit with a Hawaian shirt on.  Any Jacoby references?


Internet address: Floyd@ufcc.ufl.edu
Bitnet address  : Floyd@ufcc
All opinions expressed are my own or mine.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: jorngh@dhhalden.no (JORN GUNNAR HALONEN)
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Organization: Ostfold College
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 19:00:53 GMT

>>Has anyone seen 'KISS Meets Phantom Of The Park' ? I mean, can a movie

>Yeah, it was pretty smelly. But as a loyal member of the Kiss Army at
>the time, I _had_ to see it, you understand. However, I always thought
>this was not a theatrical release, but something like a ABC Movie of
>the Week. Was I incorrect?

I don't know about the US, but in Norway (Europe as well ?) there
obviously was some celluloid copies around since I saw it at a
theatre. It was the kind of movie that wasn't promoted in any way,
it just came and went leaving the 'KISS Army' pleased/embarassed.
(depends on the eye who sees:)

Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
From: sbarnhar@mailbox.mail.umn.edu (Dr. Barnhart)
Subject: Re: Movies you heard were good but sucked (was Re: Most Embarassing Movie)
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Organization: U of Mn Propoganda Ministry
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:02:48 GMT

In article <1992Sep9.185510.26219@b23a.b23a.ingr.com>,
alfa@b23a.b23a.ingr.com (Laura Pina) wrote:

> Naked Lunch (i think you have to be stoned to get it)
The book was virtually unreadable, too.


> that kinda new one w/blonde and michael douglas - i forget the name.
> touted as erotic.  Get a grip!  EROTIC - NOT!  Take a look at Greenaway's
> CTWL or Henry & June and that'll teach you what erotic is.

Greenaway?  Now THERE'S a fraud.  CTWL was a nauseating exercise in
self-indulgent filmmaking.  The Video dealer magazine that we get at the
video store is touting Prospero's Books to video rental outlets as "the
most nudity per minute as any recent release."  I think they've got his
number.

Henry and June?  Puhleeze.  I thought I was going to fall asleep the better
part of the movie.  Pick any Russ Meyer film and you'll find more
compelling eroticism than Henry and June had.

Shawn Barnhart ! sbarnhar@mailbox.mail.umn.edu
I'm not selling out, I'm buying in.
From: ar619@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jaime Villacorte)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Jog shuttle wars (was Re: Heres on for you Alien freaks !)
Date: 15 Sep 1992 08:11:04 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: ar619@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jaime Villacorte)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, gre253@mis.csiro.au (Steven Green) says:
[...description of Alien jog-shuttle find deleted...]

>OK - let the jog-shuttle gun fight commence!

	My favorite jog-shuttle discovery was stepping through the "Animato"
end-sequence in Mike Jittlov's The Wizard of Speed and Time. Talk about
subliminal messages! For a stretch of several seconds during the animation,
there was literally a small, slightly concealed, hand written message in
every frame. It helps to have a laserdisc copy of the movie (to get the
detail) and a player with digital freeze frame (the disc was CLV not CAV).

-- 
					- jaime villacorte

					  ar619@Cleveland.freenet.edu  or
					  jaime@tcville.hac.com 
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27437 alt.cult-movies:7744
From: jjdti@usho77.hou281.chevron.com (J.D.Tilander)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 11 Sep 92 18:29:57 GMT
Organization: Chevron

Somebody mentioned Golam-Globus(sp) in this vein, and I don't know if this 
was one of theirs, but for some reason I remembered my most embarassing:

BOLERO with Bodacious Bo Derek.  WHat a piece of trash.

-- 
Janet Tilander
Chevron Exploration and Production Services Co.
San Ramon, CA
Xref: sparky rec.arts.movies:27640 alt.cult-movies:7853
From: sasse@netcom.com (Ellen Sasse)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies,alt.cult-movies
Subject: Re: Most Embarassing Movie
Date: 14 Sep 92 15:41:46 GMT
Organization: Not

merlyn@ora.com (Randal L. Schwartz) writes: 

> OK, as long as we're naming dumb Bo Derek movies, let me put in my
> vote for "Ghosts Can't Do It".  No, Bo, they certainly can't.  Some
> old greek guy (name slips my mind at 1am) talks to former wife (Bo)
> from beyond the grave telling her that he will re-inhabit some body so
> that she can make love to him again.  Deep sigh.

Oh my God, someone else has seen this movie! (talk about embarassing,
and I am admitting it in front of a potentially worldwide audience).
Oh, that was so bad it was funny, I had to show it to my roommate.
Every now and then he'll still look at me and go, "Oh, Great One?" (For
those of you who have missed this delectable treasure of a movie, that's
what Bo called her Ghost-husband. Seriously.)

And we mustn't forget the cameo by Donald Trump where he plays -
a rich businessman. And what's even funnier, he stunk! Can't play himself!

The other poor unfortunate associated with this movie was Anthony Quinn.
Whenever he was on they surrounded him by a dark screen with effects
like a foil window that someone has just jumped through. He soundecd
drunk or asleep the whole time. I would too!

> Why is it that Bo can make lovemaking look sooooo boring?  Sheesh.
> Maybe I just have a better set of fantasies about Bo than John Derek
> does. :-) (Hey, John, come make a video with *me* and your wife. :-)

> Enough.  It's getting warm in here. :-)

Heh heh. Hey, John Derek is a businessman, I'm sure he's open to ideas,
especially if they are moneymaking propositions. And they've GOT to be
more creative than Bo and the Banana (actually I just heard about that)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies