HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: SECBU@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: LOVING:Molestation?!
Date: 23 Jul 92 21:47:36 GMT
 <1992Jul23.184537.26080@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>










Could some kind soul post an update for yesterday.  I only
caught the last 5 minutes of the show and have no idea
what happened.

It sounded like he touched her somehow, and that she allowed
it.  I can't figure out how much older than him she
was supposed to be.


Regarding Jack........ personally, I cheered when I realized
the writers threw him overboard.  Their wedding was SICKENING.
I hate these two together.  The actor that played Jack made me
sick.  I will miss him (NNNOOOOTTTTTT).


Stacy and Trucker seem kind of strangely matched, but, perhaps
it could take Stacey into a new direction.  She is just too
darn wholesome sometimes.

What will the effects of Clay's parentage have on his standing
as a wanna-be Alden.  Who will then run Alden Enterprises??
Shana???

I wish they would tell him already.

Overall, the show has gotten better lately.
I agree with you poster, Giff and Gaff should stay together
and whine.  He does nothing for me, and frankly, I think
Tricia will end up dumping him in short order anyway.


Just my NSHO.
Sharon
*****************************************************************
Quotes for Today:

Indecision is the key to flexibility.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: lkern@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Leesa J Kern)
Subject: Re: GL
Organization: The Ohio State University
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 15:03:23 GMT

In article <1550@emdeng.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> jreeves@emdeng.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Jack
i.A.Reeves) writes:
>
>I'm glad Alan-Michael finally told Alexandra how he feels.  I don't agree
>with how he feels, but if that how it is then he needed to tell her and
>get it in the open.  BUT,...

I DO!  I think that's EXACTLY what Alexandra will do if (and when) Nick ever 
becomes interested in being businessman extraordinaire.  I thought this scene 
was great.

What would be even greater would be if Alan returned and decided that, to 
insure AM's getting the presidency, he needs to get the CEO-ship from Alex.  
Now that would be a battle.  They wouldn't just be warring for their pride or 
for ownership of the company, but to pass that company on to their children. 
And when their children are involved, both Alex and Alan can be mighty vicious.
I'd like to see this.

> ... he said something that REALLY bothered me.  It was something about
>getting what he deserved because of "how hard I've worked all these years."
>
>ALL THESE YEARS?!  He's fresh out of college!  OK, so he ages three times
>faster than the normal human being, which is normal on a soap.  Even so, he
>could only be in his early thirties, and he wants to HEAD a multi-national
>corporation?!  I was ready to throw something through the TV at him.
>

I've found that those foam rubber bricks "invented" to throw at referees at 
football games work really well.  Of course, in the dorms we used shoes (wasn't
our TV!)

Leesa

******************************************************************************
Leesa J. Kern                          lkern@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
Dept. of Sociology, OSU

With all the socialization I've gone through, it's hard to say whose ideas are
expressed here!
            >>>Support Freedom of Choice: LONG LIVE VINYL LP'S<<<
******************************************************************************
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: schwinge@utkvx3.utk.edu (schwinge, angela m)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: GL:  Comments on Monday
Date: 28 Jul 92 15:12:00 GMT
Organization: University of Tennessee Computing Center
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41


I just love Frank! Have I told you that before?:)  I just loved the way he told
David not to give him any bullshit (not those exact words) about his attitude
about being in jail is better than living with his mom/dad or having Hamp
telling him how to act.  As Frank clearly pointed out at least now you are
free!  (Anyone care for some lima beans?)  Alan-Michael may be generous with
his money but Frank is generous with his heart!!!

I was glad Julie didn't tell Bridget who she had a date with.  At least she is 
still being cautious with her instead of being friendly.  I mean Bridget did
sleep with her boyfriend.  I sure wouldn't forgive that.  Julie really looked
pretty in her sexy, pink dress.  And talking about dresses, what about Blakes? 
Was she showing cleavage or what?  Any comments from you guys on these dresses? 
I sure didn't like Blake's hair yesterday though.  Since I'm rambling I don't
like Eve's hair either.  It looks stringy and she is constantly putting it
behind her ears.  If it is bothering her then maybe she needs to get a
hairstyle.  At least some bangs.  IMHO of course.

Angela
schwinge@utkvx3.utk.edu  
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: gck@hector.uucp (24641-kemmerling)
Subject: Re: AMC:Tan:Welcome
Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 20:25:55 GMT
Keywords: you forgot me!!!

> 
> 	As an "anyone else I missed",  thank you for the welcome!!
> 
> 	Melissa M.
> 


Me too!  Thanx!


Gayle
From: ggarcia@mipos2.intel.com (Gilbert Garcia)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: WARD: LUST: GnS Ramblings
Date: 22 Jul 92 16:06:46 GMT
Reply-To: ggarcia@mipos2.UUCP (Gilbert Garcia)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Microprocessor Component Group, Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA

In article <XyeaoB5w164w@grafex.cupertino.ca.us> steveh@grafex.cupertino.ca.us (Steve Harding KA6ETB) writes:
>roxy@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (r.prisco) writes:

[...]

>> I DON'T like the new Easily, but I wanna know where she got that swimsuit!
>
>Which one?  She was almost wearing two of them.
>Which brings to mind another question.  Where DO these women get their
>swimsuits?  Everytime they show up near water they are wearing a different
>one.

I have a question for you all.  I think it was last Thursday when Emily
was wearing a two piece bikini (I think it was like yellow and red).
Anyway, her top piece was cut soooo low that you could see her tan lines
she got from wearing less revealing swimwear.  Anybody remember this, or
is my TV adding extra shadows and tan marks again (those damn TV repairers
said it was fixed!).

Anyway, I did not find this very enticing?  Did any of you male wardees
find this attractive?

What about you female wardees?  Would you DARE wear such a swimsuit?

]...[

>ALL RIGHT!!! Who has been into the toy bag?!  The electric pickle is
>missing!

It wasn't me!  I have a feeling it could have been GG or JillB - they
were giggling all night long the other evening over in the ladies room.


*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
*~*                                     *~*  "You've been hanging around  *~*
*~*                                     *~*         with tramps...        *~*
*~*  Gilbert H. Garcia                  *~*   with cheap clothes and bad  *~*
*~*  e-mail: ggarcia@cory.Berkeley.EDU  *~*        songs to sing."        *~*
*~*          ggarcia@mipos2.intel.com   *~*     From MADONNA to MTV,      *~*
*~*                                     *~*        November, 1991         *~*
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
From: peea224@chpc.utexas.edu (Joanna L. Castillo)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: DOOL: TAN: (was Re: DOOL: Bring back Marty)
Date: 31 Jul 92 17:58:55 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas System - CHPC

In article <1992Jul31.131229.21850@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mins@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (timothy.j.mizerak) writes:
>In article <l7h1tfINNsaq@jethro.Corp.Sun.COM> hither@yohn.Corp.Sun.COM writes:
>>
>>Toying with my affections, Ms Castillo? Raising my hopes only to
>>flippantly toss me, and my hopes,  aside? I am crushed. I hope this is some
>>cruel joke, or I shall have to turn my attentions to one who 
>>won't treat me so insensitively. And after a stunt like that,
>>Tim would seem more sensitive.
>
>Now Tom, do you *see* why I am the way I am?  :)

I don't know about Tom but I don't see what any of this has to do with 
the way *you* are, Tim!  And, now that I think back on events, if 
you'd just kept *your* big trap shut, poor Tom and I wouldn't have had 
to live out these past few painful days on the net.  Geesh...Tim's the
one behind it all.  Why am I not surprised?

>>Cindy! Are you listening? Do you see how she treats me?
>>I am just a toy to her. A plaything. (Insert uncontrollable sobbing here.)
>
>It's no use Tom.  They stick together like your tongue on the bottom of an
>ice cube tray.  Why *do* I keep doing that?  :)

Maybe *that* explains why you're the way you are.

>|  What is it up in the air for?                :   Timothy Mizerak        |

Joanna.

| \____ ----- ____/           |  "Let's just be friends -- friends   |
|      ( o o )                |  who never talk or see each other."  |
|       \   /   Gus-ball!!    |      - David Letterman, 7-22-92      |
|        (_)  Hook 'em Horns! |       peea224@hermes.chpc.utexas.edu |
From: semele@OSCAR.BELLCORE.COM (Semele Halkedis)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: ATWT: Lurker's Day
Date: 28 Jul 92 18:28:53 GMT

>Hi, everyone!

>Well, I'm glad someone finally found the
>key to the boiler room!   I've been in there
>for the past ten months, with only my piano
>phone and Mozart and Chopin for company.
>Haven't posted since the original yearbook,
>so thought I'd take advantage of the Luker's
>(that's Lurker's) Day invitation to post.
>Still alive and well, but nicknameless.....

>Mary Siringo

Welcome!

The boiler room . . . you sneaky little devil.  I had forgotten
all about that convenient little spot.  (I bet Nursie has too!)
You do realize that you'll have to share now.

As for nicknameless - If you've been in the boiler room for 
ten months, how `bout something with HOT in it.
Some help out there, please.  Steve, you're good with nicknames . . .


GGG


-------------------------
Semele Halkedis
semele@oscar.bellcore.com
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kudra@hubcap.clemson.edu (sallie j kudra)
Subject: DOOL: TAN: Let's see if this works
Keywords: DOOL
Organization: Clemson University
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:29:30 GMT

Hi guys, let's see if the suggestions I got are gonna garner some replies.

First of all thanks to Joanna, Tim and Rick (someone else... Erica) for the
hints on distribution.

Tim, the person who told me to leave it rec is generally a very reliable source
of info.  Maybe he (snicker, chortle, guffaw) was wrong( un uh, no way, un uh)
about what to do. (We aren't getting along to well these days, can you tell?)

I will close for now hoping that more than I will see this.  BTW, if you do
just say you got it please.  I do so love mail.

Sallie "Hoping to hear from you" Kudra


* BITNET:   KUDRA@CLEMSON.CLEMSON.EDU | All opinions are my own:              * 
* INTERNET: KUDRA@ITC.CLEMSON.EDU     |            I'm too old to change now! *
* Sallie Kudra, Information Systems Development, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC   *


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: jake@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (MARY REVELEY)
Subject: Re: GH: Update for Wednesday, 07/29/92
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
Distribution: usa
Date: 31 Jul 1992 16:42 EST  

In article <Bs9G6x.K06@news.udel.edu>, nan@ravel.udel.edu (Nanette Reisor) writes...
>In article <1992Jul30.025631.17344@cbfsb.cb.att.com> bsvachak@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (barbara.svachak) writes:
> 
>other stuff deleted...
> 
>=>
>=>gone, and a bit nervous too.  Jason thinks the body got washed away with the
>=>tide... [does lake Erie have a tide?  I've never been there, so I don't
>=>know... but it sounded pretty weird to me]  They want to take the boat they
> 
>All bodies of water are effected by the gravity of the moon (which is the
>primary cause of tides). This includes the puddle in your driveway after it
>rains. If the body of water is big enough the effect will be noticeable as a
>tide. I believe all the Great Lakes are big enough to have noticeable tides.
> 
I live in Cleveland and there are no noticable tides here.  Maybe the tides 
run east to west though making them noticable in St. Charles (Buffalo)?
> 
>-- 
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>                                                       Nanette Reisor
>        |\| /-\ |\|                                       CNS/MIS
>     nan@brahms.udel.edu                           University of Delaware
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: rippel@sophia.smith.edu (JR)
Subject: Re: ATWT: other roles
Organization: Smith College
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 23:27:35 GMT

In article <24JUL199216182183@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov> afpaeji@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov (JIM PAE) writes:
>>>rippel@sophia.smith.edu (JR) writes:
>>Hmmm,  I think I like it.  How about just Joisey?

>Joisey...hmmm.  It's simple, it's descriptive, it's fun to say.  I vote we 
>keep it.  Welcome, Joisey!  Cast off your old moniker of Jennifer the 
>nickless wonder and be re-baptised into the World of the Ward.  You are 
>saved!!!

>
>tooTALL

Hallelujah!!!!

Joisey
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| JR    (Jennifer Rippel) | "Nothin' matters in this whole wide world, |
| rippel@sophia.smith.edu |  When you're in love with a Jersey girl."  |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: n2413@cray.com (Jo Theis)
Subject: Re: ATWT postings
Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
Date: 30 Jul 92 08:19:25 CDT

In article <Jul.29.10.22.59.1992.26279@andromeda.rutgers.edu> dowzycki@andromeda.rutgers.edu (Ken Dowzycki) writes:
>
>   If anyone can see this posting, please, please, contact me
>either as a follow up or by e-mail.  I can't seem to get
>through to any newsgroups.
>
>   This is being posted on July 29, 10:26 AM EST.
>
>If you would be so kind to reply please include the date and
>time you are reading this.  Thank you.

Well hi, Ken!  Decided to continue reading the group anyway, huh? :)

I'm reading this at 8:19 AM CDT, July 30th.

- JoelessJo


-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Jo Theis				Illegitimus non           
    n2413@cray.com			carborundum est     
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: mjheal@bnr.ca (MJ Heal)
Subject: Re: DOOL: TAN Introducing Strawberry Peel
Reply-To: mjheal@bnr.ca
Organization: BNR, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 92 15:39:12 GMT

In article <1992Jul20.113648.9937@bogart.uucp>, cjaeger@bogart.uucp (Cecilia Jaeger) writes:

|> Hi Everyone,
|> 	The Big Banana says it offical. I AM A PEEL. Yeah !! My life is
|> complete now. 
|> 
|> I choose the name Strawberry, because I have Strawberry blond hair.
 
Welcome to the family Strawberry!!!  Glad your life is SO complete
now.

|> Sis Strawberry

Sis Lime

-- 
MJ Heal        *        BNR,Ottawa,ON,Canada        *        mjheal@bnr.ca
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What happened to the Jack "I'd sell my Grandmother for a dollar" Deveraux?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: kriesel@mari.acc.stolaf.edu (Julie R Kriesel)
Subject: GL
Keywords:  Mallet and Harley, Jenna and Michelle
Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN
Distribution: na
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 12:58:57 GMT

 
Just a few quick comments as I'm almost late for my philosophy class...

I wish that Harley and Mallet would stop pussy-footing around the subject
(moving in together) and tell each other what they want.  I really hate
it when this happens, because it invariably means that the characters
are going to have some problem or other.  (IOAS, IOAS, IOAS)

Also...I liked Jenna and Michelle's scenes together again.  (The scenes
in the 'vator weren't a fluke.)  Question:  how old is Michelle supposed
to be?  She was talking about a cute boy at camp..I don't think that I
noticed boys when I was so young, but hey...          

Julie K


Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: rha@ralph.lafayette.la.us (Ruth Alleman)
Subject: AW: update 7-23
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 16:16:30 GMT
Organization: Home Sweet Home, Lafayette, LA

Dennis and Byron are at the gym talking about business and
Marley.  Byron knows that Dennis is lying when he says he's fine
with Byron and Marley seeing each other.

Donna visits Marley with some "sexy" clothes.  Donna gives her
some man advise.  Marley is going out with Byron tonight and
plans to use the gifts.

Vicki goes to see Ryan at the apartment where he's watching her.
He blows up at her.  She appologizes, and then finds out that
Ryan wasn't there.  She asks where he went and Ryan tells her
about the explosion and Grant and Amanda being injured.  She asks
about both and Ryan gets upset when she asks about Grant.
Frankie also is there and is sorry she didn't catch that the
clown who delivered a gift was a messenger from Carl.

St. Jamie and John are on the roof of the hospital talking when
the 3 interns show up.  They all think they did terrible work in
the ER but Jamie assures them that they did wonderfully.  After
many minutes they finally believe and celebrate.  They bring up
buckets and tease Jamie for kicking a bucket while operating on
Grant.  Everyone goes to check on patients except for Jamie and
Kelsey.  Jake comes around at just the right moment and goes on
the roof too.  Jake sneaks up and video tapes them.  Jamie and
Kelsey make mushy talk and kiss as Jake records it all.

John sees Donna at the hospital.  He tells her that he wants to
move back to the farm.  She's not happy but agrees.  They'll talk
later.

Dennis drops by Vicki's (Ryan thinks it's Carl because of the
limo), he wants to know if he has a chance with Marley.  Ryan is
watching and wondering out loud to Frankie what is going on.
Vicki compares Dennis' situation with her own.  Dennis says he's
in love with Marley, Vicki says go for it.  He reads a poem from
a book he bought for Marley.  Vicki says Marley will love it.
Dennis leaves, Vicki hugs him at the door.

Vicki goes to explain to Ryan what was going on.  Ryan gives her
an intercom so she won't have to make hand signals at the window.
Vicki is a little miffed that he won't acknowledge her birthday.

Paulina and Jake are reading the newspaper accounts of St.
Jamie's heroism.  He goes off to work, Hannah and Paulina have a
sisterly talk about men.  Rachel shows up to talk to Paulina
about Jamie and Jake.  The mayor wants to give Jamie an award and
he wants his family there (no Jake).  Paulina says no Jake no
her.  Rachel tries to work it out but Paulina stands by her man.

Byron meets Marley at the Gallery.  He brings roses, balloons,
and tickets to a ballet.  They are just about ready to go when
Dennis comes in.  He was wanting to give her the book but
doesn't.  After Marley and Byron leave Dennis throws the book.

Ruth.
From: jdale@nsfuvax (JANE)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
Subject: Re: AMC: TAN-Is anyone reading?
Date: 26 Jul 92 01:34:00 GMT
Organization: Mathematics Computer Network, University of Oklahoma
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <1992Jul24.180836.24222@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>, wulfekuh@cps.msu.edu.cps.msu.edu (Marilyn R Wulfekuhler) writes...
>(I tried to send this by mail, but your mailer either truncates your
>header or our mailer doesn't know your site)
> 
>In article <1992Jul23.130936.1972@brandonu.ca> pitzel@brandonu.ca writes:
>>I don't mean to whine, but I am quite upset that people apparently do not take
>>the time to read other people's posts lately. 
> 
>You shouldn't assume that people are not reading posts before blindly
>going ahead with their own.  Remember that not everyone is on the
>internet (very fast turnaround time).  Some people's newsfeeds may take 
>a day or two to receive postings that you have already seen.
> 
>That said (I always like to give people the benefit of the doubt) ...
> 
>FLAME SUIT ON
>However, it does seem that this newsgroup is at times just a
>leetle bit cliquish in that people seem to respond more to the 
>well known frequent posters than us ordinary folks, regardless of 
>where the subject first came up.
>FLAME SUIT OFF
> 
>Maybe that's just my imagination though.
> 
>Marilyn
>wulfekuh@cps.msu.edu

             ***Another thing -- Here in (God help us) Oklahoma
                we see AMC the day after the East Coast and so
                we do have a preview of each show.  Thanks 
                for the previews....   Anyway, we do tend to post
                our comments later and most likely repeat stuff.
                It is also confusing for me because I read some of
                the postings of everyone's ideas about what is going
                to happen and get them confused with what is happening
                and then I begin to think that these posters should be
                writing for the show since they obviously know what is
                going to happen. 

                 Also, (original poster PITZEL), I don't mean to flame -
                 but I have had times when I have wanted to whine at
                 at the way people post things.  I also feel my time is
                 valuable, but I do take it into consideration that their
                 net systems are not as sophisticated as mine.  I ignore it
                 and just hit the "n" key.

                                            *** j.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps
From: sager@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (mike.r.sager)
Subject: SB: BJ "dating" Frank (was Re: SB: let's save the show
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 04:25:00 GMT

In article <1992Jul28.014453.24544@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu>, jarnolde@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu (John Arnolde) writes:
> In article <1992Jul27.185320.7224@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> 22302LMK@MSU writes:
> >To say the least. The only  thing that could possible upset me is the fact that
> >if who ever posted the spoiler list, the part where BJ and Frank start dating
> >is higly repulsive. That particular storyline IF it happens could upset alot of
> >people.
> 
> I have a feeling that "the date" will either be in court, or in therapy. You
> know how the mags love to perk up the attention of their readers, kinda like
> the tabloids.
> 

Several people have responded to someone's spoiler about BJ dating Frank,
so I thought I'd throw in my opinion.  I don't see this happening, at least
not for real.  My guess is that when the SB police try to arrest Frank, they
realize they don't have enough evidence; it's just his word against hers.  So,
Cruz and company try to "setup" Frank by having BJ "date" him.  Then they nab
Frank when he tries to force himself upon BJ.

Mike