From: sharrow@sumax.seattleu.edu (M. J. Sharrow)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.jewish,alt.politics.usa.misc,alt.politics.usa.constitution
Subject: Role Of Jewish Media In Shaping Our Politics
Date: 1 Oct 92 03:27:14 GMT
Organization: Seattle University, Seattle WA

Hi folks,

Honouring the numerous requests for sending my original article on this
topic, I am posting it once again as it is not possible for me to post it
to all the requestors.

=========================================================================

The article below is long, but please bear with me it is different from
the dose we receive from the one sided media.


    As a lifetime naturalist and environmental  activist, the idea of having
    a real environmentalist in the White House brings tears to my eyes.

    However, the more I learn about  the  candidates  and the gang they will
    bring with them, the more I wonder just  what really drives the program.
    When one of this weekend's  news  shows  named  Steven  Solarz as on the
    short list for Secretary of State,  I  stopped  wondering. It has become
    crystal clear that,  whatever  Clinton  may  believe  or want, it is the
    Friends of Israel who are controlling this campaign and the only goal is
    to reinstate Israel's "special relationship" with the US.

    When George Bush faced off with AIPAC  (and won) over $10 billion in aid
    to Israel, these  people  were  outraged and  vowed  bitter vengeance. A
    simple analysis of all the bad  news  that has come out about Bush, will
    point to this news conference on Sept. 12, 1991 as time zero.

    The most recent canard the  media  is  dragging  out is the desertion of
    Bush by  the  so-called  Neo-conservatives.  All  these  people, Richard
    Pearl, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Henry Kissinger,  etc., are turning to Clinton
    in droves. Why this should  surprise  anyone  is just another example of
    how Israel-driven, US politics and policies really are.

    The only issue that separates  Neo-Cons  from  old line Conservatives is
    their blind and dogmatic devotion to Israel. Reagan bought their program
    and was the best friend Israel  ever  had. Bush feels otherwise and they
    are gone. Gone to whomever and  whatever  will keep the money flowing to
    Israel.

    Lest there be any doubt where Clinton stands, in a June 30 statement, he
    said: "If I ever let Israel down, God would never forgive me."

    I suspect that means he would sacrifice  the environment rather than let
    Israel down too.

    According to the Washington Jewish Week,  "In eight years as a member of
    the House and seven years in the  Senate,  Gore  has compiled one of the
    strongest pro-Israel records on the Hill. He has a 100 percent record on
    foreign aid. As a member of the Senate  Armed Services Committee, he has
    been a champion of US-Israel strategic cooperation."

    Clinton's all-out support of  Israel  and his selection of Gore is not a
    matter of chance. Hardly  a  day  passes  without  the  name  of another
    leading pro-Israel  activist  surfacing  from  Clinton's  campaign inner
    circle. Top adviser David  Ifshin  is  general  counsel  to the American
    Israel Public Affairs committee (AIPAC), Israel's Washington lobby.

    Mickey Kantor, who took over  Ifshin's  campaign  chairman duties as the
    Clinton staff grew, has  been  active  in  Los  Angeles fund-raising for
    Israeli causes and pro-Israel candidates.

    The Washington Post revealed  that  Clinton's  finance  chairman,  whose
    father is an Israeli, had been involved in an AIPAC coordinated campaign
    to bring in outside funds and  student  volunteers to defeat Congressman
    Paul Findley.

    Another report revealed that Clinton's media adviser was born in Israel.

    Sarah Ehrman, national Jewish coordinator  of the Clinton campaign, is a
    family friend in whose Washington apartment Hillary Clinton stayed while
    working as an attorney during the Watergate  hearings. Ehrman, who drove
    Hillary to the Clintons' wedding  in  Fayeteville in 1974, also has been
    an employee in AIPAC's Washington  headquarters  for  the past 12 years.
    She left AIPAC last month to join the Clinton staff.

    I started out saying that Solarz  was  mentioned as a possible Secretary
    of State. The real question is, what state? Here is some background from
    Paul Findley's book, THEY DARE TO SPEAK OUT....

        In  his  newsletter,  Congressman  Solarz  said  that  he sought
        membership on the Foreign Affairs Committee "because I wanted to
        be in a position to be  helpful  to  Israel. As a result, Israel
        will soon be receiving  a  grand  total  of $660 million MORE in
        military  and  economic  aid  than  it  received  from  the  U S
        government last year."

        Solarz's zeal was  unabated  in  1984  when,  as a member of the
        House  -  Senate  conference  on  Export  Administration  Act
        amendemnts, he  demanded  in   a  public  meeting  to  know  the
        legislation's  implications   for  Israel.  He  asked, "is there
        anything that the  Israelis  want  from  us or could conceivably
        want from us that they  weren't  able to get?... Have you spoken
        to  the  Israeli  embassy?...  You  are  giving  me  an absolute
        assurance that they have  no  reservation  at  all  about this?"
        Finally convinced that Israel  was content with the legislation,
        Solarz said: "If they have no  problem with it, then there is no
        reason for us to."

    Not only is the Clinton/Gore  choice  for Sec state an obvious traitor to
    his country but he is a blatant  crook.  He was near the top of the list
    of House check kiters, both in number of checks and total dollars.

    Is it also a  coincidence  that  NY  has  also  furnished  us  with  the
    Clinton/Gore/Israel ticket's first  candidate  for the Supreme Court? Is
    not Mario Cuomo the best friend Israel ever had?

    Sorry, fellow environmentalists, I  will  not entrust the environment or
    my country to  an  Administration  controlled  by  Israel  or  any other
    country for that matter.

    My concern is that 3% or so of the Jews in our country are controlling
    90% or more of the financial and media resources. With this much one
    sided control the current status is totally comprehendible.

    I am not a supporter of either of the two candidates and might vote
    for Perot if he decides to run but the reason Bush is getting the stick is
    that is he trying to get tough in controlling the campaign contribution
    from the powerful PAC's in addition to some other measures so that our
    political system which has become highly corrupt and is going down the
    toilet due to this reason can be cleaned up. 
 
    I hope this is enough of a message to you to take a closer look at your
    alternatives other than Clinton because the 3% are not the only ones
    in this country that need support, the other 97% need there problems
    looked into also.
 

    MJS.

                                ...............


    If you are tired of "learning"  about  American foreign policy from what
    is effectively, Israeli controlled  media,  I  highly recommend checking
    out the Washington Report. A free  sample  copy  is available by calling
    the American Education Trust at:

                                 (800) 368 5788


    You can also tune in to the Amateur  Radio Forum (ARF) Sunday evening at
    9:PM Chicago time, 3950 KHZ, LSB.



Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa,talk.politics.misc,talk.environment,alt.activism,soc.culture.african.american,dc.general