From: pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU (Stephen Grossman)
Subject: Re: Marxism
Reply-To: pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU
Organization: UMASS DARTMOUTH, NO. DARTMOUTH, MA.
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 22:27:33 GMT

In article <1993Jan23.235738.19937@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu>, mkagalen@lynx.dac.northeastern.edu (michael kagalenko) writes:
>You still dont know what paranoya is about ? Read this article , then !
>It's an endless fun.
>
>In article <C183Et.An3@umassd.edu> pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU writes:
>>Soviet imperialism is merely a phase of the Marxist dialectic. While the fools 
>>scream about ancient ethnic hatred, Marxist lie in wait and plot. The dialectic 
>>is in its split or retreat stage and when sufficient Soviet missiles and 
>>missile subs have been built (and they are continuing to be built) then the 
>>dialectic will unify the revolution and go on the attack.
>>	The leader of the phony Soviet coup, Gennadi Yanayev, was/is the head 
>>of the International Policy Commission of the CC of the CPSU. The IPC 
>>supervises the International Dept, the most important center of the 
>>international communist conspiracy. The ID coordinates all Marxist parties, 
>>allied groups, terrorists, etc. This is the permanent institution of 
>>international communism. It's not even secret. It publishes _International 
>>Affairs_ (Moscow), a brilliant, THEORETICAL journal of international policy. 
>>_IA_ often complains that American Pragmatists try to destroy the revolution by 
>>denying a leading role to theory. _IA_ is somewhat confused about Pragmatist 
>>motives but typically thinks they are intentionally harmful. Stalin, Lenin, and 
>>Mao knew better and correctly identified the stupidity of anti-theoretical 
>>Pragmatists whose idea of war and revolution was limited to immediate military 
>>action. Marxists know war is basically intellectual and then political. Then, 
>>much later, it is military. 
>>	Soviet Marxists have used the dialectic in such events as: 
>>Brest-Litovsk Treaty, Far Eastern Republic, The Trust, Tanaka Memorial, 
>>Stalin's Constitution, Uncle Joe Against fascism, Khrushchev's destalinazation, 
>>2nd Yugoslav-Soviet split, Sino-Soviet split, Cuban missile crisis, Gorby's 
>>glasnost, withdrawal from east Europe, phony split between phony conservative 
>>and phony liberal Soviets, Soviet breakup, Soviet search for froeign aid and 
>>international respectability.
>>	Another IPC head was Alex Yakovlev, alleged liberal and Movement for 
>>Democratic Reform co-founder. Strange coincidence? Only to a Pragmatist for 
>>whom no events are causally related.
>>	Chinese Marxists told stupid American Pragmatists that they (Marxists) 
>>were agrarian reformers. They were! For that stage in history! Then they 
>>conquered China and the revolution advanced.
>>	No. Vietnamese Marxists told stupid American Pragmatists they were 
>>nationalists. They were! For that stage in history! US won the conventional 
>>military and even guerilla war. But Marxists staged militarily stupid Tet 
>>offensive and won political victory when US withdrew. 
>>	Theoretical disputes among Marxists 
>>and claims that Marxism has ended at various times 
>>or was never tried are not serious. They ignore dialectic  which allows 
>>Marxists to split and retreat as proper part of revolution. Marxists not afraid 
>>of retreat. They consider retreat a NECESSARY part of revolution. History, as 
>>Lenin thought is a zig-zag. 
>>	Soviets have had a first strike nuclear missile strategy since, at 
>>least, Sokovlovsky's integrated view of war in _Sov. Mil. Strategy_. They have 
>>had a capacity to WIN a nuclear WW3 since, at least, 1980. They can hit 
>>military, destroy most of US nuclear force, tolerate 20 million Soviet civilian 
>>dead (US missiles aimed mainly at Soviet civilians (McNamara's immoral MAD 
>>policy) and, with Sov leaders, nuclear forces,( hidden, protected, or phony), 
>>and industry safe, blackmail US with 2nd strike on cities w/150 million 
>>potentially dead. US would surrender. Various US leaders warned about Soviet 
>>nuclear power after "coup" but no one listened. 
>>	US needs a theory of international relations that is integrated and 
>>long-range. We need immediate low-tech anti-missile deployment (possible w/off 
>>the shelf equipment) and serious SDI in near future. US must take Marxist 
>>agents-of-influence seriously. Agents-of-influence are more powerful than 
>>military. They must be arrested and tried for treason or espionage. And, if 
>>found guilty, killed. 
>>
>  
SG	Is your use of the ad hominem fallacy the result of dishonesty or 
stupidity?
________________________________________________________________________________
	"In that world, you'll be able to rise in the morning with the spirit
you had known in your childhood: that spirit of eagerness, adventure and cer-
tainty which comes from dealing with a rational universe."
                                                              AYN RAND
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Grossman <PMSC13SG@UMASSD.EDU>
================================================================================