From: thood@corvus.matrox.com (Thomas Hood)
Newsgroups: can.politics,soc.culture.canada
Subject: Re: Has Denis Seen the Light or is he just passing gas? Re: Tom Gray who is ra*
Date: 2 Sep 92 15:53:34 GMT
Organization: Matrox Ltd.

This is too much.  I hate to associate myself in any way with this
kind of thing, but this is too much.

grayt@Software.Mitel.COM (Tom Gray) writes:

>You know Denis - you're not even worth spitting on. However I will
>continue to answer your little postings. When you begin to create your
                         ^^^^^^ cheap rhetorical device
>little fantasies about oppression and and then claim that you didn't
 ^^^^^^ cheap rhetorical device
>when these fantasies are exposed,  I'll be there to reveal your
>(perhaps unconcious) duplicity.
          ^^^^^^^^^^ unconscious  (unconscious duplicity is an oxymoron)

Childish Abuse.

>I'll post a reply to your full post later but I truly belives that
                                               believe ^^^^^^^
>that will be redundant. It is chock full of non-sequitors, fantasies
                                  - ^        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ non-sequitur
>and ravings about the anglo demon.

You seem to be trying to prove his fantasies true by your own demoniac
ravings.


>You know I wish we could create two countries. One for the people
         ^ ,
>who realize that what ever what, there are multiple cultures in this
   no matter what ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ?
>geographical region that have to learn to live together. These people
                                                     cultures?  ^^^^^^
>and there antecedents have created a country which approaches
     ^^^^^their  ^^^^^ancestors ?
>(with its warts) a paradise on earth. The other country is for
                  ^^^^^^^^^^!   ^ E
>the people who can see relationships only in terms of domination.
>The Dalton Maccarthy's, the George Brown's, the J.P. Tardivel,
                     ^                   ^ no apostrophes
>the M. Duplessis'. These people can create a country along there
                                   	         in their ^^^^^^^^^^^
>own tendencies and it will be they who have to tolerate the
     ^^^^^^^^^^ image?                  ^^^^ will have
>bile like the above post not the rest of us.
           ^^^ that in   ^,

>and Denis still cannot accept the  success of the Quiet Revolution.
>Primarily because he is not one of its supporters. If the Quiet
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ sentence fragment
>revolution was intended to open Quebec to the possibilities of
 ^ R                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ variety?
>the world, its opponents wished to keep Quebec secure in
                          ^^^^^^ wanted
>ignorance and reject the richness of other cultures. 
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [barf]
>I would not see Denis as supporting the revolution. Rather
                                         ^ R             , ^
>I would see him as a Quiet Counter-Revolutionary in the
>like of Laurin - beating the anglo-demom to hide form the 
 ^^^^ image?                            ^ n       ^^^^ from
>truth.

Please don't post again until you've grown up a bit.

--
Thomas Hood                                                    thood@matrox.com
Montreal
Xref: sparky can.politics:6331 soc.culture.canada:6221