From: yeh@netix.com (Mr Shannon Yeh)
Subject: Re: Mao vs. Deng (Re: incident)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Organization: Netix Communications, Inc.
Date: 22 Jul 92 04:33:36 GMT

<SXS30@psuvm.psu.edu> wrote:

first of all, let's get some basic questioned cleared:

	1. How many ways out there people can use to make money?
	2. is Deng Xiaoping's way the best (among those tradional ways of
	   money making)?
	3. Without Deng Xiaoping, will China be runied?
        4. is it true that people cannot make money until they compromise
	   their XinNian (belief)?
	5. Without Chairman Mao, how will today's China be?
	6. Let's take Shannon Yeh as an example.  Some people said that 
	   Shannon Yeh was conservative; some others said that Shannon Yeh 
	   is an ultra-leftist.  Regardless these staements are true or false,
	   is it true that:
		6.1  Deng Xiaoping are more open minded than Yeh?
		6.2  Deng Xiaoping understands how to make money much more 
		     than Yeh does?
	   Yeh is just an example here, there are many Yeh compatibles in
	   the US and in China.
	   (please note the difference between China and the US: the US 
	    president does not have much power on its internal things; but in
	    China, 95% people's fate are controlled by the central government.
	    So, it doesn't matter for the US to have a stupid president, but
            it matters a lot if China's emperor is a stupid guy or a shortly
	    eye-sighted guy.  I understand that you will say "then, let's 
	    change the Chinese system to which is similar to the US", hooray, 
	    do it.  but before this approach can be realized, you got to worry
	    about the current setup (in CHina)).

shannon
-------

PS: i would like to discuss the above listed questions first, then, discuss 
    your message.

+In article <2A6CB967.2484@noiro.acs.uci.edu>, yeh@netix.com (Mr Shannon Yeh)
+says:
+>
+>No, Mao is NOT a destruction oriented person.  Mao established a country,
+>which
+>is called as "New China".  Weather this "New China" is better or worse than
+>the "Old China" should be another issue, but only blinds cannot see the
+>difference between "Old China" and "New China".  Mao is aggreesive and full
+>of HuanXiang (illusion?).
+
+>Deng Xiaoping is a kind of manager type person.  If someone already founded a
+>company such as the "P R China Corporation", he can work as a manager at this
+>corporation.  In other words, if Mao did not exist, and if Chiang Kai-shek
+>still were the emperor of China and keep doing the corruptive things, Deng
+>Xiaoping will *definately* NOT be able to destroy Chiang Kai-shek to establish
+>a different China.
+
+  In another word, DXP has to destruct the "New China" to prove that he
+  is not just manager-type person?
+
+>Mao is a senior politician, Deng is a "tech"-politician.  Mao knew how to
+>control his people, Deng knows how to cheat his people.
+
+  I am sure if Mao is still alive, he will give you are 9 Pin/(conmmon)
+  on any topic you said about him.  Unless he don't have an asscess to this
+  net. But, someone can fake an account for him, so his "no fart" poem can
+  be circulated as "red title" Central WenJian. -)
+
+>
+>But, please be advised that we have millions of qualified personnels to work
+>as the manager of "P R China Corporation".  Let alone myself, most of the SCC
+>readers can handle a better job than Deng.
+
+ Then let's set up millions of Branches.
+
+>
+>Also, please ask yourselves a question: why the Chinese seldom (almost never)
+>support the real genuine people to be their "emperors"?
+
+ There are so many people in (or temperary outside) China want to be
+ emperor, so no one knows who is "genuine", Do you agree me at this, Mr. Yeh?
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china