HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tom@ssd.csd.harris.com (Tom Horsley)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Union Dues or Taxes -- King George is Exactly Right!
Date: 14 Apr 92 12:38:23 GMT
Organization: Harris Computer Systems Division
In-reply-to: B645ZAW@UTARLG.UTA.EDU's message of 13 Apr 92 22:29:00 GMT

>>>>> Regarding Union Dues or Taxes -- King George is Exactly Right!; B645ZAW@UTARLG.UTA.EDU (Stephen Tice) adds:

> No mistake, the principle is more important -- equality of representation. 
> On this, I agree 100% ... "Atta boy, George." ;^)

Not only is the principle important, but the unions have been following it
since the decision in 1988.

Not only is the principle important, but it was important in 1988, 1989,
1990, 1991, and 1992.

As Lane Kirkland (head of AFL-CIO) said yesterday: "The President gives
hypocrisy a bad name".
--
======================================================================
domain: tahorsley@csd.harris.com       USMail: Tom Horsley
  uucp: ...!uunet!hcx1!tahorsley               511 Kingbird Circle
                                               Delray Beach, FL  33444
+==== Censorship is the only form of Obscenity ======================+
|     (Wait, I forgot government tobacco subsidies...)               |
+====================================================================+
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:18227 ca.politics:3478 ba.politics:2662 alt.politics.homosexuality:2129
From: pmm7@ellis.uchicago.edu (peggy boucher murphy (you had to ask?))
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,ca.politics,ba.politics,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: Straight Child molesters?
Date: 14 Apr 92 21:06:58 GMT
Reply-To: pmm7@midway.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations

In article <kag9iB7w164w@Nitro.CtEdge.COM> djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM writes:
in response to the question "have you ever seen heteros dragging kids 
around...  
>Yes I have.... With a jug
>of booze in the other hand. 

oh.  so sober les/bi/gays mistreat kids, but only drunk hets do?  
please give me a break.  selective eyesight?  


to questions about minding inflicting _________ on children:  
religion? 
>No.  
why not?  they have no say in it.  shouldn't 
they get to choose their own way?  

political beliefs? 
>No. 
really?  shouldn't they be taught to think for themselves?  

bigotry?  
>Depends.  
sigh.  this is sad.  passing on hatred.  i hope you don't 
consider yourself a christian...

>Some things just should not be. 

yup. bigotry.  

and you don't need to tell me this is your opinion.  did you think
i would mistake it for any form of fact?  

peg
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:17057 ca.politics:3335 ba.politics:2586 alt.politics.homosexuality:1774 soc.motss:19373
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,ca.politics,ba.politics,alt.politics.homosexuality,soc.motss
Subject: Re: Straight Child molesters?
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 20:30:08 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

manis@cs.ubc.ca (Vincent Manis) writes:

> I think we should have djk frozen in a block of Lucite, and placed on
> permanent exhibition. Idiocy on this scale really deserves publicity. 
> --
> \    Vincent Manis <manis@cs.ubc.ca>      "There is no law that vulgarity and

Why are antagonistic points of view always reported as 'stupid'?

I don't think your 'side' is stupid - I just think they are
trying to rationalize mass depravity. That's all.

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:17077 soc.culture.canada:3199
From: labach@acs5.acs.ucalgary.ca (Terence Michael Labach)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,soc.culture.canada
Subject: Re: Sydney Sharpe and Don Braid's new book on the Reform Party
Date: 4 Apr 92 17:26:34 GMT
	<1992Apr2.180530.15781@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
Organization: Free Yourself!

In article <1992Apr2.180530.15781@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes: 
> You seem to prefer politicians who lie.  Who is really selling the
> snake-oil...the Reform Party or the Liberal Party...(or the NDP)?
 
The Reform Party.

"...steps can be taken to remove them from positions of influence within
 the party in Manitoba."
 - Preston Manning on 'dissidents' in the Reform Party in a letter sent
   to Manitoba members

"Of course, all sectors of the party have the right to express their
 views."
 - Preston Manning, in his book on the Reform Party, The New Canada

Preston "the Messiah" Manning talks the democratic talk, but he doesn't
walk the walk.

- terry -
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:17086 talk.politics.mideast:10341
From: chf0@newshost.gte.com (Curtis Fennell)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.mideast
Subject: Re: Want facts?  "WHO RUNS THE MEDIA?  The Alarming Facts"
Date: 7 Apr 92 12:51:55 GMT
Reply-To: chf0@gte.com
Followup-To: talk.politics.misc
Organization: GTE Laboratories, Waltham, MA

In article <gate.JF5RiB1w164w@b-cpu.UUCP>, ralphw@b-cpu.UUCP (Ralph Winston) writes:
|>                           WHO RUNS THE MEDIA?
|>                           The Alarming Facts
|>
|> ...few Americans outside the media establishment are aware of the
|> Jewish hegemony in the media.

It constantly amazes me how those who disagree with what the
mainstream media is saying will eventually conclude that the media is
run by a conspiracy of those they oppose:

1. During Vietnam, the media was "the liberal media" bent on
destroying US efforts in Vietnam.

2. In 1988, I received a mass mailing from Dan Quayle's father,
accusing the "liberal media" of bias against his son.

3. In the aftermath of the Gulf War, there have been consistent
charges that the media is "the mouthpiece of the government" and "a
tool of big oil".

4. Now we have Mr. Winston charging that the media is run mainly by
Jewish interests.

Perhaps the truth is that the mainstream media reports what it thinks
the American public wants to hear, regardless of political
considerations.

-- 
============================================================
Curt Fennell    [   "Get DOWN off that cross, honey!       ]
chf0@gte.com	[    Somebody needs the wood!"             ]
============================================================
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:18535 alt.individualism:2483
From: gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.individualism
Subject: Re: Libertarians ARE Liberals (was: Perot for President)
Date: 17 Apr 92 00:59:48 GMT
Article-I.D.: cunixf.1992Apr17.005948.30153
Reply-To: gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare)
Organization: Curious Goods (formerly Louis Vendredi Antiques)

baker@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Andrew Baker) writes:
>gld@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Gary L Dare) writes:
>
>>Helmut Kohl's moves at the recent Maastricht EC/EU conference proposing
>>a Charter for Labour, German government actions to mediate the GATT
>
>I agree that The Economist is a fine example of classical liberalism --
>which is why, however, it is generally against things like the EC
>social charter which you want to include as being liberal also.

Kohl's proposed Labour Charter and the so-called social charter being
argued about are two different things ...

gld
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Je me souviens ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gary L. Dare				U.S. Elections 1992, Vote Now:
> gld@cunixB.cc.columbia.EDU		a) Elvis 50's stamp, or
> gld@cunixc.BITNET			b) Elvis 70's stamp?
From: dfpedro@nv2.uswnvg.com (Donn F. Pedro)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Straight Child molesters?
Date: 6 Apr 92 16:59:15 GMT
Organization: US West NewVector, Bellevue, WA

In article <21550@ucrmath.ucr.edu> starbuck@ucrmath.ucr.edu (aaron greenwood) writes:
>It is hard to believe that most people on this net have college degrees.

Kind of waters down your faith in college educations, doesn't it.

>The subject line of this thread is 'Straight Child molesters?'.  What has
>this to do with the newsgroup ca.politics not that the content of the 30 or
>so posts that I skimmed had anything to do with the subject line.

Ask Clayton Cramer (cramer@optilink) and Davey boy (dlk@nitro.com).

>I would like to request that follow ups to this topic be directed to the
>appropriate groups.  Please edit out the ca.politics from the newsgroups
>in the header.

Good luck asking, but the bigots just *have* to spread the word.



     Donn Pedro ...................{uunet, sequent, pn400}!uswnvg!dfpedro.
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.individualism
From: jackr@thorodin.dazixco.ingr.com (Jack Reed)
Subject: Re: Drug Legalization. Was: College Was: Perot
Reply-To: jackr@thorodin.dazixco.ingr.com
Organization: Dazix
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 22:47:30 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.173716.10354@oakhill.sps.mot.com>, dong@oakhill.sps.mot.com (Don M. Gibson) writes:
> 
> Tangent on the issue.  Increased usage effects of legalization for 
> alcohol and drugs will not be similar at all.  Drugs (except pot) 
> are *extremely* addictive.  So addictive, in fact, that a
> one-time experiment can lead to a life-time addiction.  That cannot
> be said for alcohol and that is why they are different.  
>   

But it can be said about tobacco.

So why is it still legal?

Jack Leonard Reed
From: pgf@usl.edu (Phil G. Fraering)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Brown or Perot...Do you WANT change or NOT?!
Date: 7 Apr 92 18:15:56 GMT
Article-I.D.: srl06.pgf.702670556
Organization: Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana

golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:

>In article <pgf.702351849@srl05.cacs.usl.edu> pgf@usl.edu (Phil G. Fraering) writes:
>>tedwards@src.umd.edu (Thomas Grant Edwards) writes:
>>
>>>In article <1992Mar30.154639.13515@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> baker@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Andrew Baker) writes:
>>>>Jerry Brown is protectionist and pro-union; he is a terrific example himself
>>>>of a special-interest-group politician.
>>
>>>Jerry Brown is pro-union.
>>
>>>Jerry Brown is _not_ a protectionist.  He does not favour ending free-trade
>>>with Japan, Korea, or Europe.  However, he _is_ an environmentalist, and he
>>>_does_ believe in civil rights, and he _is_not_ willing to continue free-trade
>>>with Mexico, a country falling into an unending death-spiral of 
>>>pollution and poverty due to the way it's workers are exploited.
>>
>>It's in a death spiral of pollution and poverty? The pollution is going
>>to be a problem to us, free trade or not; how is tarrifs on Mexican
>>goods going to get them out of the spiral of pollution and poverty?
>>

>The EEC is not only a free-trade zone but it comes along with a social
>charter which has minimum standards for democratic rights and
>institutions, worker rights, environmental standards, etc...such a
>social charter should come along with NAFTA...and I think Brown would
>then fully support it.

As I pointed out earlier, they've been "socialist" since 1920,
according to all the propaganda. Businesses certianly have very
limited property rights, except for the favored government cronies.
They probably have stricter legislation than we do.... given that,
how is the set of problems to be solved?

What would happen if we flooded Mexico City with cheap, high-quality
goods with stickers on them saying "This isn't choking you to death!"?
A free trade treaty would allow this; but if we (and they) go the
protectionist route their populace will still receive the single
nonchoice of buying goods made in the same old polluting "government-
industry partnership for the benefit of the workers" cartels.

Finally: does anyone here want to have an import tariff on oil from
countries without our high enviornmental standards? You'd pay twice
as much for gas, and I'd be able to take a full load of courses next
Fall Semester, with the upswing in the economy down here...

In short, if you want to argue for protectionism due to enviornmentalism,
it can cut against you a great deal.......



--
Phil Fraering pgf@nasa12.usl.edu 318/365-5418
"How about a dragon that breathes neutrons instead of fire?  Kills the
elves, leaves the buildings intact..." - Nick Szabo
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
From: sybok@m11-113-3.MIT.EDU (The Terminator)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: right to bear arms
Date: 8 Apr 92 00:17:47 GMT
Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

In article <1992Apr7.203624.5638@talon.ucs.orst.edu> mcgredo@bluto.ie.orst.edu writes:
>cl231519@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes
>>A note about the constitution and the right to bear arms:
>>
>>1)it guarantees your right to own a musket.(that's all thefirearms they had
>>back then)

Wrong.  They also had flintlock concealable pistols and cannons.
Besides, it would be the right to own and carry a musket even by your
twisted interpretation.
>
>And clearly, the first amendment only protects publishing when manually  
>operated presses with hand-set type are used (that's all they had back  
>then).  Assault Xerox machines are right out.
From: czl30@duts.ccc.amdahl.com (Chris Lee)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Why should Libya hand over the PanAm bombers?
Date: 6 Apr 92 19:52:16 GMT
Reply-To: czl30@DUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Chris Lee)
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA

In article <53504@hydra.gatech.EDU> ccoprmd@prism.gatech.EDU (Matthew DeLuca) writes:
>When there's a war underneath it?
>
>What's been missing from this discussion as of late is the fact that the 
>Vincennes had come under attack by gunboats not long before.  The crew was
>understandably jumpy.
>
>Matthew DeLuca                      "Being next to Dorsai is a slow form of

So what? It wasn't the USA's war.

Chris
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,rec.autos,sci.econ
From: ganek@apollo.hp.com (Dan Ganek)
Subject: Re: Japan could be skirting $30 billon in U.S. taxes annually
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Chelmsford, MA
Distribution: usa
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1992 18:27:34 GMT


>   Japan uses countries like Singapore, which do not levy taxes, as
>middlemen to ship their products to the U.S.  The idea is that the price
>mark-up occurs in a country outside of the U.S., so when the final productis sold in the U.S., very little profit margin is realized- hence little
>or no taxes paid to the U.S.  Japan also has another scheme which doesn't
>involve an intermediate country, but I didn't catch all of it (towards
>the beginning of the story).

And American multi-national companies don't do the same thing?

/dan ganek 
ganek@apollo.hp.com
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:18597 alt.drugs:7854 misc.legal:9409
From: tom@genie.slhs.udel.edu (tom)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.drugs,misc.legal
Subject: Re: 60 Minutes piece on the Forfeiture Law
Date: 17 Apr 92 18:08:58 GMT
Article-I.D.: genie.1992Apr17.180858.12774
Organization: The Lab Rats

In article <peercy.703456880@dopey.crhc.uiuc.edu> peercy@crhc.uiuc.edu (Mike Peercy) writes:

}I've thought for some time that the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and
}Corrupt Organizations) statutes might be turned against government
}bodies themselves.  To my understanding, these statutes include
}provisions for the suit, in civil court, of "corrupt" or "racketeering"
}organizations for triple damages.  Clearly, there is no organization more
}corrupt or racketeering than the government (in its many bodies).

}Can't those who have been wronged by the government (e.g., seizure without
}conviction) sue for _triple_ damages, rather than just to get their money
}or car back? 

it's a nice idea, but it tends to lose out in practice, since you would
be suing them in government run courts. ask the christic institute how
their RICO suits against the CIA are faring...

}Or has Congress thoughtfully exempted government bodies in the writing of
}the law.

they forgot to originally, but two years ago there was a bill to correct
this little oversight (retroactively!!!). i think it passed. oh well,
yet another law that congress knows is so bad that they made themselves
exempt from it.
-- 
tom@udel.edu                                        ...!{gateway}!udel!tom
tom@genie.slhs.udel.edu           UDel: School of Life and Health Sciences

"Themes were useless; Destiny was here, and the foot pedals were bleeding."
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:17716 talk.bizarre:10790 alt.activism:7512 alt.flame:6480
From: mjd@saul.cis.upenn.edu (Not The Son of God in disguise)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,talk.bizarre,alt.activism,alt.flame
Subject: Re: Ozone problem burns Michael Deignan
Date: 10 Apr 92 16:43:28 GMT
	<1992Apr4.023330.20169@meteor.wisc.edu>
	<1992Apr8.063143.16172@tygra.Michigan.COM>
Followup-To: talk.politics.misc,misc.test,alt.activism,alt.flame
Organization: Eaters of Wisdom
In-reply-to: jp@tygra.Michigan.COM's message of 8 Apr 92 06:31:43 GMT

In article <1992Apr8.063143.16172@tygra.Michigan.COM> jp@tygra.Michigan.COM (John Palmer) writes:
   (along with Mr. Dolan who may
   not post to the net anymore, but he does spy on us

    Gracious me.  How on earth does one spy on discussions that are
transacted publicly in the first place.  Brian Reid says that there are
at least 2,000 people in the world who read talk.bizarre.  Very few of
them seem to be posting.  (Thank God).  Spies, I suppose, every one of
them.  Should I be paranoid now?

    And how on earth did you get out of my killfile?  I thought I'd
stored that particular line in write-once-no-erase memory.

--

        A woman does NOT like a CLUMSY, FUMBLING man with an ICE PICK.
Mark-Jason Dominus 	  			    mjd@central.cis.upenn.edu
From: pas@kepler.unh.edu (Paul A Sand)
Subject: Re: Bill Moyers: Listening to America
Organization: University of New Hampshire
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 01:57:05 GMT

jm> == Jim Mason

jm> [...yakity yakity yakity...] Do you have any conception of how many
    Americans are believers in horoscopes, channeling, mystic-crystals
    and UFO abductions ? How about faith-healing ? [...yakity yakity
    yakity...]

Sigh. No I don't. Do you? Are there any hard facts behind any of this
babble?
-- 
-- Paul A. Sand                | Question Authority. 
-- University of New Hampshire | Why? Because I say so, that's why.
-- pas@kepler.unh.edu          |  
Xref: sparky talk.politics.misc:17516 talk.politics.guns:11438
From: cdt@sw.stratus.com (C. D. Tavares)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: right to bear arms
Date: 9 Apr 92 14:52:20 GMT
Article-I.D.: transfer.2050
Followup-To: talk.politics.misc
Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc.

In article <alberti.702715886@ux.acs.umn.edu>, alberti@ux.acs.umn.edu (Timothy Fay) writes:
> I think it is outrageous that there are people out in the woods teaching
> bears to shoot at defenseless hunters...  Next thing you know, they'll be
> giving pistols to deer, and uzis to squirrels...
> 
> What?  What's that...?  The right to bear arms, not arm bears...?
> Oh, sorry...

Jesus, Emily -- you're not only 15 years late, you're dead.
-- 

cdt@pdp.sw.stratus.com      --If you believe that I speak for my company,
OR cdt@vos.stratus.com        write today for my special Investors' Packet...
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.individualism
From: golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy)
Subject: Re: The Character Issue in Bipartisan Perspective
Organization: University of Toronto Chemistry Department
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 01:00:36 GMT

In article <1992Apr11.101428.9653@Princeton.EDU> niepornt@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (David Marc Nieporent) writes:
>In article <1992Apr8.224947.27059@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:
>>In article <RV.92Apr7195936@cslab8a.cs.brown.edu> rv@cs.brown.edu (Rodrigo Vanegas) writes:
>>>In article <1992Apr4.223815.3029@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>, golchowy@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Gerald Olchowy) writes:
>
>>>>>  The Character Issue in Bipartisan Perspective
>
>>>>>  Bill Clinton:
>>>>>    If he lied to his wife, will he lie to the country?
>
>>>> The answer to this one is yes...Clinton lied to the voters in Florida
>>>> about Paul Tsongas, and he is lying this weekend to the voters in New
>>>> York about Jerry Brown.
>
>>>Why?  What did he say?
>
>>Clinton ran radio ads, I think, implying Brown was against a woman's
>>right to choose....in Florida, he tried to scare seniors and Jewish
>>Americans by lying about Tsongas, in NY, he tried to scare women
>>by lying about Brown.
>
>Brown *IS* against a woman's right to choose.  Or at least doesn't
>support it very strongly.  Even the Village Voice, which endorsed Brown,
>called him the weakest of the Democrats on abortion rights.
>
>He once said "killing the unborn is crazy," after one of his
>pilgrrimages to Mother Theresa, and he wrote a letter to Gov Bob
>Martinez of Florida asking to him to release an Operation Rescue person
>from jail -- she was sent there for breaking and entering and vandalism,
>and threatened to do it again if released.
>
>>Clinton is a liar!                          
>

One can be personally opposed to abortion, and yet be pro-choice, which
is the situation with Brown...and his public record on this is clear...
and is strongly-pro-choice...he is for full public-funding of abortions
in fact...Clinton is wishy-washy on the issure of full public funding
of abortions, as he is on most things.

As for the OR person in jail...the person had been incarcerated longer
than any other person in Florida had ever had for the same offense, and
he was conveying a request of Mother Theresa.

The request for a release in this case is thus just a case for simple  
justice, that a special punishment not be exacted from a particular
individual...in essence, because the person had served more time than
anyone else for the equivalent offense, the only reason the person was
continued to be held was for their political views...which essentially
was making the person a political prisoner.

Gerald
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.activism
From: djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,ca.politics,ba.politics,alt.politics.homosexuality,soc.motss
Subject: Re: Straight Child molesters?
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 20:27:43 PDT
Distribution: world
Organization: NMS&Systems Engineering

oliver@gayley.math.ucla.edu (Mike Oliver) writes:

> Out of curiosity, do you think that it is impossible for a homosexual
> man to have sex with a woman?  That would be a truly remarkable belief,
> but if you held it it would seem to make it more difficult to make
> a moral case against homosexual activity.  Not impossible, you
> could say that these unfortunates are just condemned to do without,
> but surely more difficult.
> 


Nope.. I don't think that... But if they are running around trading
weenies like that - NO WONDER AIDS is so damn prevalent.

"gee all we do is screw anything that moves - whats wrong with it?"

-djk

--- Daniel J. Karnes / WA6NDT --------------------------------------
--- NMS&Systems Engineering ----------------------------------------
--- Djk@Nitro.CtEdge.COM / ..CtEdge!Nitro!Djk ----------------------
-- 'innovative solutions for modern problems' ----------------------
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,rec.sport.hockey
From: snichols@adobe.com (Sherri Nichols)
Subject: Re: Greedy Athletes
Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 00:15:26 GMT

In article <Edt=9m_00Uh7Q6ur0v@andrew.cmu.edu> "Carl D. Lovejoy" <cl3d+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>thinking know.  They Like the rest of the South could give a rats ass
>about Hockey.

This simply isn't true.  Or perhaps the fact that the University of
Alabama-Huntsville has a hockey team is demonstrating "giving a rats ass"
about hockey.  

It is true, however, that if you can't see hockey, you won't ever pick up
interest in hockey.  The NHL shot itself in the foot in a big way when it
took the SC contract, and became invisible to vast parts of the country.

Sherri Nichols
snichols@adobe.com



Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.elections,misc.taxes,alt.society.civil-liberty