HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: wolf@leland.Stanford.EDU (Andy Wolfsberg)
Subject: Re: Barney is not getting the press he deserves
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 92 19:13:57 GMT

In article <Bz3wKp.DJH@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> ipgrier@sail.uwaterloo.ca (Iain P. Grier) writes:
>In article <1992Dec10.183403.4509@news.cs.brandeis.edu> st923399@pip.cc.brandeis.edu writes:
>>Doesn't anyone want to talk about Barney Gumble?!?
>>                 Allegra
>
>I think he and Letterman should be nicer to each other.
>

Speaking of nice, wasn't last night's show a bit on the "dark" side?
I guess it made up for for the fact that there was not I&S

- Homer is a man and Herb is his brother
- Herb hates Homer
- And he's not shy about expressing it

But then it had that Tooooooo-happy-an-ending
From: glazier@isr.harvard.edu (Andrew Baker Glazier)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: Snowball I
Date: 14 Dec 92 15:56:59 GMT
Organization: Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

In article <622@blue.cis.pitt.edu> mxsst1+@pitt.edu (Michael   Stroucken) writes:
>Anybody know who Snowball I was and what happened to her?
>MS
>-- 
>			Revenge is a dish best served cold, Smithers!
>Internet: mxsst1@pitt.edu,       Anonymously: wi.6194@n7kbt.rain.com        :)

DON'T POST QUESTIONS UNLESS YOU'VE READ THE FAQ!!!!!!!!!!!!

Has this been said enough times for you now?

Snowball I was Lisa's first cat, and it was hit by a car.

-- 
"A horse! A horse! Somebody give me a horse, man, because|glazier@ 
I come to bury this dirtball, not to praise him. Whaddya |harvard.isr.edu
think I am? Whether it's nobler for the mind to make people suffer with all
these totally outrageous arrows arrows for a fortune, or what!" -- D.R.
From: glazier@isr.harvard.edu (Andrew Baker Glazier)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: Movie Parodies
Date: 15 Dec 92 15:50:25 GMT
Organization: Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

In article <N17sVB3w164w@admiral.uucp> barcheta@admiral.uucp (Alec Cornell) writes:
>hacker@shark.cis.ufl.edu (Marcos Hacker) writes:
>
>> 
>>    Is there a list of the movie parodies from the Simpson's? I've
>> noticed parodies from Goodfellas, An Officer and a Gentleman,
>> Raiders of the Lost Ark, etc. This last episode also contained
>> a parody that I think was from the movie Brainstorm. When Homer
>> is sitting in the "Sharper Image" chair, and begins to hallucinate,
>> it reminded me of a seen from the end of the movie. The movie
>> stared Christopher Walken and Natalie Wood. Did and one else
>> notice?
>> 
This is also in the faq


>
>Actually, I thought the scene where Homer sees visions on the vibrating 
>chair was ripped off (or should I say, an homage to) the scene in 2001 
>The Space Odyssey, near the end when the astronaut looks arrives at 
>Jupiter and sees similar things.  The look back at Homie's face 
>especially reminded me of 2001.  Without, it could have almost been Dr. 
>Who or "Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure"'s funky time travel vortex 
>stuff.
>
>Red Barchetta
>
>--
>barcheta%admiral.uucp@yale.edu (Alec Cornell) <yale!admiral!barcheta>
>The Admiral's Public UNIX - Greenwich, CT - System Administrator: Doug Fields
>(HST/V32) (203)661-2873 -- (PEP/V32) -1279 -- (V32) -0450 -- (V29/MNP6) -2967
>>FREE!< Unix shell accounts, Usenet access, and Internet-style mail available


-- 
"A horse! A horse! Somebody give me a horse, man, because|glazier@ 
I come to bury this dirtball, not to praise him. Whaddya |harvard.isr.edu
think I am? Whether it's nobler for the mind to make people suffer with all
these totally outrageous arrows arrows for a fortune, or what!" -- D.R.
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: simon@sun1x.actc.res.utc.com (Mike Simon)
Subject: au sound files
Organization: United Technologies Research Center
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 15:22:16 GMT

Does anyone have any sound files of the simpsons ??  There used to be
some out here, could whoever posted them in the past send me them or
repost to this forum.

                                    thanks,

                                           -- sluggo --

-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% MIKE%NW8550@UTRCGW.UTC.COM  | "I claim this little piece of dirt in the name %%              -- SLUGGO --   | of Duck Dodgers in the 24 & 1/2 century!!!!.." %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
From: Bucky.Whaley@launchpad.unc.edu (Bucky Whaley)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: oh my gosh: a SIMPSONS BLASPHEMER!!!
Date: 21 Dec 92 00:46:29 GMT
            <1h1h0oINNdq8@cs.widener.edu> 
            <1992Dec20.180630.2722@samba.oit.unc.edu>
Organization: The Lutefisk Watch, Sector 7-G

I <Bucky.Whaley@launchpad.unc.edu (Bucky Whaley)> *erroneously* wrote:
>The FAQmeister, c8923075@mystra.newcastle.edu.au (Chris Baird), writes:
>>This is just to let those new to the 'group that this Robert Holmes
>>character is unfortunately one of those losers you occasionally have
>>to put up with on unmoderated Usenet newsgroups,, ``ROBBER BARON'', as
>>he used to be known, 
>
>a.k.a. The Rubber Baton.
 ^^^^^^

'Scuse me.  That should have read, "_Not to be confused with_ The Rubber
Baton."  Synapse lapse. 


>This disclaimer is not boring and pointless:

Is too.
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
From: kieran@world.std.com (Aaron L Dickey)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: Marge's reaction
Date: 12 Dec 1992 00:12:19 -0600
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu



On Thu, 10 Dec 1992 ds@dcs.edinburgh.ac.uk wrote:

> Have you ever thought that this might be intentional ? Like maybe a joke ? You know,
> funny, like you get in comedy programs sometimes. 
> 
> Smithers : " His name is Homer Simspon, sir, from sector 7-G"
> Burns : " Simpson Eeehhhhhhh????"
> 
> I think it's a bit of a catchphrase.

Of COURSE it's intentional; I was just pointing out that there happens to
be VERY little continuity between episodes.  Case in point: yesterday's
episode here in the States was a repeat of the one where Homer's brother
comes back and invents to "Baby Translator".  There were some references
in the episode to the fact that Homer had obtained his couch by taking
it from the Flanders' trash pile almost 10 years ago. Yet last week when Maggie
spoke, they made it clear that the Simpsons didn't meet the Flanders until
1984 when they moved into their current house.  There's a DEFINITE
continuity problem there.  I fully realize that's this is INTENTIONALLY
done; but it is done nonetheless.

--Aaron



Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: jacobw@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Jacob Solomon Weinstein)
Subject: Re: Simpsons isn't JUST for non-thinking right-wingers
Originator: news@nimaster
Organization: Princeton University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 23:53:23 GMT

In article <1992Dec12.151216.27981@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> flaps@dgp.toronto.edu (Alan J Rosenthal) writes:
>>glazier@isr.harvard.edu (Andrew Baker Glazier) writes:
>>>Seeing the Pres. spout about his 22 million bosses made me want to puke!
>
>zeke@fasttech.com (Bohdan Tashchuk) writes:
>>The Simpsons isn't JUST for adults. It's meant to entertain children, too.
>>I see nothing wrong with having simple moral messages along with the story.
>
>The point is, many of us found that statement morally offensive.  We don't
>believe that the president of the USA takes direction from ordinary people; we
>think that he is opposed to ordinary people and acts immorally.  We think that
>having him say pleasant saccharine things about how properly he acts is
>offensive.

It's reactions like this that make me think TV shows should be
smiley-captioned for the irony-impaired. It seems to me that there are
two possibilities: 1, that for some reason, _The Simpsons_ decided they
had been too harsh on the American political system, and decided to
stick in a bit of saccharine that ran utterly contrary to the spirit of
the rest of that particular episode for no reason whatsoever; 2, that IT WAS A
JOKE. Now, call me crazy, but the fact that the point of the whole
episode was how slimy DC is, and given that Matt Groening (who, of
course, does not write every episode, but provides the guiding
sensibility of the show) has often stated that it is his goal in life to
annoy Republican as often as possible, and given that the whole
corruption-cleaning up sequence was so outlandish that to have taken it
seriously would have required the surgical removal of one's sense of
irony, I tend to suspect that the 22-million bosses line was actually a
joke at the president's expense. But hey, that's just me.
declared it his goal in life to annoy
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: poutsmaj@mace.cc.purdue.edu (unknown)
Subject: Re: Continuity error spotted.
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 18:18:17 GMT

In article <1992Dec11.214721.14971@ee.ryerson.ca> cal@ee.ryerson.ca (Calvin Henry-Cotnam) writes:
>
>How could he have such a shirt at such a young age (with hair) when
>he watched the episode telling who shot J.R. when he was older (and balder)?
>

This leads me to me question:  Can anyone figure out exactly WHEN Homer
lost his hair?  From the 'Maggie Speaks' episode, we know he had hair
in 1983 (fall) ("Girls..just want to have fu-un").  And in the episode with]
Danny Devito (Unky Herb), we know he was bald for 'Hands accross America'.
I don't know what year this was.  Can anybody tell me:

1)  When exactly was 'Hands accross America'
2)  Are there other references of which you might know between HAA and 1983
where Homer does/not have hair which would help to 'bracket' the time of 
baldness.

I'd appreciate any responses to PAUL@GLOW.CHEM.PURDUE.EDU.  I will summarize
the posts I get....

Thanks
paul

Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: Bucky.Whaley@launchpad.unc.edu (Bucky Whaley)
Subject: Re: Continuity error spotted.
Organization: The Lutefisk Watch, Sector 7G 
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 18:28:34 GMT

KitchenRN@ssd0.laafb.af.mil writes:

>J.R. was shot on the last episode of the season (what year was that, 
>anyway?) [...]

Spring 1980


This disclaimer is not boring and pointless...
--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
From: glazier@isr.harvard.edu (Andrew Baker Glazier)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: The "J" in Bart & Homer Simpson
Date: 14 Dec 92 21:38:00 GMT
Organization: Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

According to the FAQ, the initial is something to do with Bullwinkle, but
according to SI (not sports, simpsons) it stands for "Jojo" (at least,
that's what Bart's stands for; this is in the 3-D issue)
-- 
"A horse! A horse! Somebody give me a horse, man, because|glazier@ 
I come to bury this dirtball, not to praise him. Whaddya |harvard.isr.edu
think I am? Whether it's nobler for the mind to make people suffer with all
these totally outrageous arrows arrows for a fortune, or what!" -- D.R.
From: c8923075@mystra.newcastle.edu.au (Chris Baird)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Homer & Ren & Stimpy
Date: 20 Dec 92 03:25:17 GMT
Organization: Widener University Mail/News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.widener.edu


It's likely I won't get to enjoy this episode for ~9 months, but
here's my two cents,,

Carl Oppedahl:
^ ... This seems like a new thing for the Simpsons; I don't recall
^ having seen such distorted faces to quite this extreme before.

The `Bart-Twitch' (recall ``All the way from Gay Pari'' [7G11], ``How
about a Ro-Bot with a Human Brain?'' [7F13]) possibly _pre-dates_ R&S,
so I don't have a problem with it.  (NB Freeze-Framers: Check out
Bart's electrocution in ``Deep, Deep Trouble'' ... Yowsers!)

ObQuestionForBill: Would you know of any cuts Gracie have made to the
show, or other interesting `Scenes we never got to see'?

-- 
Chris Baird,,  <c8923075@mystra.newcastle.edu.au>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: ipgrier@sail.uwaterloo.ca (Iain P. Grier)
Subject: Re: Barney is not getting the press he deserves
Organization: University of Waterloo
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 17:58:00 GMT

In article <1992Dec10.183403.4509@news.cs.brandeis.edu> st923399@pip.cc.brandeis.edu writes:
>Doesn't anyone want to talk about Barney Gumble?!?
>                 Allegra

I think he and Letterman should be nicer to each other.

Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: rbrbrn@picard.cs.wisc.edu (Robert Holmes)
Subject: Re: Two Errors accounted for
Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison -- Computer Sciences Dept.
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 00:18:33 GMT

In article <1992Dec11.104433.19398@ncrcae.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM> paul@clodii.Columbia.NCR.COM (Paul Fidler) writes:
>In article <ByzBA0.BtG@CAM.ORG> emru@CAM.ORG (Emru Townsend) writes:
>>In article <1992Dec7.001519.15513@cs.wisc.edu> rbrbrn@picard.cs.wisc.edu (Robert Holmes) writes:
>>>>
>>>Who cares.  It's a fucking cartoon.  It doesn't have to make sense.
>>
>>Regardless of the medium, there is such a thing as good writing and bad
>>writing.  Cartoons have their own internal logic as well.
>
>Or, more specific to this thread, there is a such thing as character comedy
>versus mere situational comedy. TS clearly falls into the former category:
>A good example of well-developed character comedy.  However, to *maintain*
>a good character comedy, you have to stay true to the characters.....
>
>You might say "It's only a cartoon--it doesn't have to make sense" about REN
>& STIMPY, for example. It's based more on gags, particularly sight gags,
>over-exaggerated facial expressions, etc., one-liners, non-sequiters, and
>general bizarreness.
>
>Absolute continuity is critical to neither format, but character continuity
>*is* pretty important to a character comedy such as TS.

Whatever.........
From: baldwin@csservera.scs.usna.navy.mil (J.D. Baldwin)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: Barney is not getting the press he deserves
Date: 12 Dec 92 02:53:48 GMT
Organization: Comp. Sci. Dep't., U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD
In-reply-to: ipgrier@compass.uwaterloo.ca's message of 11 Dec 92 18:17:36 -0400

In article <Bz48LD.7wt@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>
ipgrier@compass.uwaterloo.ca (Iain P. Grier) writes:
> [great Barney quotes deleted]

"Ahhhah, Homer!  You're the king!"

ObNonSimpsons:  My two-year-old thinks Barney's the greatest, but I
                don't think we're talking about the same thing . . .
--
 From the catapult of:              |+| "If anyone disagrees with anything I
   _,_  J. D. Baldwin, Comp Sci Dept|+| say, I am quite prepared not only to
 _|70|___:::)=}-  U.S. Naval Academy|+| retract it, but also to deny under
 \      /   baldwin@usna.navy.mil   |+| oath that I ever said it." --T. Lehrer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LEAVING THE NETWORK AT XMAS.  Write me after 1 Mar 93 at: LT JD Baldwin, USN
                                                          AIR OPS DEPT
                                                          USS Nimitz (CVN-68)
                                                          FPO AP 96697-2820
From: richardsthom@bvc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Wanted: Simpsons episodes
Date: 15 Dec 92 15:32:29 CST
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA

Does anybody happen to have copies of the Simpsons episodes beginning with 
the first season onto the last episode last week?.  I am willing to pay 
all costs to anyone willing to do this for me.  I would like to give them 
as a Xmas/Birthday present.

Thanks,

Thomas
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: wagenfuh@huey.udel.edu (Karl Wagenfuehr)
Subject: Re: Get Bent
Organization: University of Delaware, Newark
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 01:27:48 GMT

In article <71674@cup.portal.com> DaPete@cup.portal.com (Pete o Wilkinson) writes:
>I would go so far as to predict that after a few years of use by angry people
>these will both be banned by the FCC. 

I don't think the FCC can ban that kind of thing because of the first amendment
(and I have certainly heard just about all the four letter words broadcast
openly at one point or another); besides, the feds don't have to ban it --
a much more potent form of censorship exists in this country:  SELF censorship!
It's the networks, of their own free will, who censor things.
-- 
                    ' ",      *
Karl Wagenfuehr         ,         "Weisst du, wieviel Sternlein stehen an dem
wagenfuh@huey.udel.edu  ,  '      blauen Himmelszelt?"  --Deutsches Volkslied
                          '
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: ridenour@leland.Stanford.EDU (Robert Lynn Ridenour)
Subject: Re: [not about] Marge's Pregnancy
Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 92 19:20:12 GMT

In article <1gt4a2INNksl@cs.widener.edu> KitchenRN@ssd0.laafb.af.mil writes:
>york@oakland-hills.lucid.com (Bill York) writes:
>>So, trivia question for all you TV-fans:  Who was the first TV-show
>>couple to be shown sharing the same bed?  
>
>Wasn't it Ricky and Kris Nelson, who were married in real life, on "The Ozzie 
>and Harriet Show"?
>

Old question.   The Munsters.

- Bob

Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: jimdean@bnr.ca (Jim Dean)
Subject: Couch & Chalkboard (was Re: [9F09] alpha release (corrections please))
Originator: jimdean@bcrks81
Reply-To: jimdean@bnr.ca
Organization: Bell-Northern Research
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:27:34 GMT


g-martin1@uiuc.edu (Gregory A. Martin) writes:
> 
> ==================================================================== 18-Dec-92
> [9F09] Homer's Triple Bypass
> ==============================================================================

> ==============================================================================
> Title Sequence
> ==============================================================================
> > Bart's Blackboard Punishment:
>         I will not belch the national anthem
>         I will not belch the    - at cutoff
>         (Recycled from [7F15])

Canadians (on Global, anyway) got:

   Coffee is not for kids

in very shaky handwriting, the last line is so bad it is just
scribbles so you can't tell what the cut-off is.

> > The Couch:
>         Couch springs out into a bed.
>         (Recycled from [7F01] and [7F15])

The lucky Canadians saw a miniature Simpsons family climb up onto a
giant couch.

> 

-- 
Jim Dean (Internet: jimdean@bnr.ca) +-----+    National Capital Baseball League
mild-mannered computer scientist -->|Phone|--> President. Pitcher. My knuckler?
Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa,Ont. |Booth|    Not too legit to hit!  6-0, 1.99
Phone: (613) 763-2135 Fax: 763-7241 +-----+    Phone: (613) 723-1580
From: DaPete@cup.portal.com (Pete o Wilkinson)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Re: Get Bent
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 16:58:18 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)


>Who'd'a thought this simple phrase would be susceptible of so 
>many interpretations?!  

It seems to me that it's just a non-descript substitute for F**K OFF, 
since you can't say that on TV (for some unknown reason). 
It's along the same line as homer's "Dho!" which, if you might recall when 
you first heard it, reminds one of a cuss word but really isn't.  
I would go so far as to predict that after a few years of use by angry people
these will both be banned by the FCC. 

.........................................................................
:                                                                       : 
: dapete@cup.portal.com         _| _  _  _ __ _        (415) 941 - 1157 :
:..............................(_|(_||_)(-' L(-'........................:
                                     |
   "Where you're at ain't no good unless you can get away from it!"
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: flaps@dgp.toronto.edu (Alan J Rosenthal)
Subject: Re: Simpsons isn't JUST for non-thinking right-wingers
Date: 13 Dec 92 05:24:21 GMT

jacobw@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Jacob Solomon Weinstein) writes:
...
>smiley-captioned for the irony-impaired.

I don't usually come out as irony-impaired in a.t.s discussions.  I may be
missing the point here, but if so, it's not my usual behaviour.

>It seems to me that there are two possibilities: 1, that for some reason, _The
>Simpsons_ decided they had been too harsh on the American political system,
...
>2, that IT WAS A JOKE.

Another possibility is that the scriptwriter was so bizarrely patriotic that
s/he didn't realize this comment was as outrageous as it was.

>Now, call me crazy, but the fact that the point of the whole episode was how
>slimy DC is, and given that Matt Groening (who, of course, does not write
>every episode, but provides the guiding sensibility of the show)

Matt Groening has not written a single episode.  He co-authored one episode.
The spirit with which he has imbued the show certainly persists, but there's no
reason to believe it impossible or even unlikely that political beliefs counter
to MG's would be presented.

I don't think that you can call "how slimy DC is" the point of the whole
episode.  I think it's the point of the first two-thirds.  It is not unusual
for Simpsons episodes to take a turn for the political worse at the last
minute.  Another such case is Itchy & Scratchy & Marge.  That's the only other
one that comes to mind at the moment since it is past midnight but there are at
least a handful of Simpsons episodes which start off with some fairly radical
sentiments but then do an about-face and apologize for them.  I think that this
episode is one of them.

>and given that the whole corruption-cleaning up sequence was so outlandish
>that to have taken it seriously would have required the surgical removal of
>one's sense of irony,

Lisa's comment that the system actually works doesn't seem to fit into this
view.  Nor does the way that all the congresspeople shouted "no" when that
slimier one suggested "tacking on a pay raise for ourselves" in the bill to
throw the Springfield congressperson out.  The end of this episode is simply a
patchwork of apologies for the beginning and middle of it.  If not, it could
surely have cut to the next scene after he proposed tacking on a pay raise for
ourselves, without everyone shouting "no", which states that slimy politicians
are an exception rather than commonplace.

Obviously the corruption-cleaning-up sequence was intended to be humourous, but
I don't think to the extent that its message was opposite from the apparent one.

(Don't let this be taken as a detraction from the wonderful final minute.  Kurt
Russell (?) is such an idiot.)
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
From: goehring@infonode.ingr.com (Richard R Goehring)
Subject: Re: willie
Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 00:47:09 GMT

mcbride@owlnet.rice.edu (Doug McBride) writes:

>In article <1992Dec10.223258.18087@colorado.edu>, doug@shako.Colorado.EDU (Doug McKnight) writes:
>> He's clearly Scottish. Whoever heard of an Irishman wrestling 
>> with wolves. We Scots do it all the time....
>> 
>> Douglas McKnight

>Aye.  The Irish wrestling with wolves... har!

   
  Don't they just Dance with Wolves ?  :-)


-- 
 ----------------------==============================+++++++++++++++++++++++
 Richard Goehring	          |
 goehring@infonode.ingr.com       |    SPRINGFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
 ...!uunet!ingr!infonode!goehring |  Bart Simpson, owner and propriater [sic]