HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: arands@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Rolf Arands)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.triathlon
Subject: Re: running shoes
Date: 15 Dec 92 20:24:44 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

>jsweeney@geppetto.encore.com (Joe Sweeney) writes:

>>I bought a pair of Asics (sp?) Gel-120 since I've always
>>had confidence in their quality and shock reduction.
>>After not running for a year, I've found that I now 
>>experience slight soreness in my knees for a few days 
>>after a run of 6 miles.

Consider a few factors.  Do you overpronate when you run?  How much do weigh? 
Motion control and cushioning offered by a shoe are affected by your weight. 
While a shoe may be good for a light person, a heavier person needs a heavier 
shoe.  

What type of surfaces do you run on?  Pavement, asphalt, dirt (hopefully)?  
Hard surface running takes its toll.  

Did you just jump in and start running 6 milers?  Starting after a one year
layoff should be done slowly.  Your body needs time to adjust to the 
new demands.

Rolf Arands
From: samari@watnxt2.ucr.edu (Tammy Woodley)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.triathlon
Subject: A good source for upcoming triathalons
Date: 17 Dec 92 00:02:37 GMT
Article-I.D.: galaxy.24443
Reply-To: samari@watserv.ucr.edu
Distribution: usa



I'm sure you guys can point me in the right direction!  I'm looking for
a mini-tri to start off with (this will be my first tri) in the Southern
California area.  Where are there lists of upcoming tri's that I can
peruse?  Could anyone suggest a specific tri that would be apropriate?

Thanks in advance!!!! :)

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tammy Woodley (student)      | " It's not I who am crazy.....
UC Riverside                 |   It's I who am MAD!!!!.......
Samari@watserv.ucr.edu or    |   We're not hitch hiking anymore....
Samari@psychophysics.ucr.edu |   We're riding!!!!!!"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.sport.triathlon
From: jsweeney@geppetto.encore.com (Joe Sweeney)
Subject: Re: running shoes
Organization: Encore Computer Corp.
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 13:17:17 GMT

jsweeney@geppetto.encore.com (Joe Sweeney) writes:

>I bought a pair of Asics (sp?) Gel-120 since I've always
>had confidence in their quality and shock reduction.
>After not running for a year, I've found that I now 
>experience slight soreness in my knees for a few days 
>after a run of 6 miles.

...let me try the above again:

"After not running for a year, I bought a pair of Asics 
Gel-120s...etc...These are new shoes, not one year old
or more shoes like the above reads...sorry.

-- 
JOE SWEENEY (jsweeney@encore.com) ENCORE COMPUTER CORP.; MELBOURNE, FLORIDA
My postings/letters are flame proof.  If you've taken offense, you may have
misunderstood me.  If you differ with me, that's just fine and your response
is welcome.  ****Please place :-) at all locations you feel necessary.****
Newsgroups: rec.sport.triathlon
From: curt@mcm.hp.com (Curt Simkins)
Subject: Re: Hed disk vs. Hed cx
Organization: HP Cardiology Business Unit -  McMinville OR
Distribution: usa
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 21:07:12 GMT

In article <1gqe3iINN229@male.EBay.Sun.COM>, warriors@eb5ts4.EBay.Sun.COM (Dave Maycon) writes:
|> From what I have read about wind testing, the disk has less drag than
|> any spoke wheel out there. Then why are many top pro's use 
|> 2x cx's compaired to the standard cx in the from and disk on the rear.
|> Does weight have anything to do with it, or does wind tunnel testing
|> say that cx is faster than disk.
|> 
|> Dave
|>           
   Chances are it was an "Ironman" event that you saw every pro using
   2 CX's or Zipp's or the J-Disc companies equivalent.  Solid discs
   are illegal in these events.  You will still probably see the 
   solid disc rear and 18-24 spoke front combo at most other events.

   Aloha Eh!
   Curt
From: UKH8@DKAUNI2.BITNET (Guenther Augustin)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.triathlon
Subject: Re: Q: Diitrich - What did he say?
Date: 17 Dec 92 09:43:33 GMT
Organization: University of Karlsruhe, Germany



>
> In article <92Nov27.053131.25958@acs.ucalgary.ca>, spesau@acs.ucalgary.ca (Sha
ne
>  P Esau) writes:
> >Speaking of the coverage of Ironman Hawaii, What did Wolfgang
> >Dittrich say to the guy who came out right behind him?  I
> >couldn't quite make it out, but it didn't sound very
> >sportsman-like.  Did anyone decipher exactly what he said?
>
> When I watched the tape for the second time I was asking the same question.
> After replaying it a number of times I believe he said "Idiot!" to Nate L.
> Wolfgang did look a little pissed and it also looked like he cut Nate off just
> before he stood up in the water.
>
>
> Lance Muzslay

Well: in the stuff broadcasted by EuroSport (and obviously taken from
some great US network ABC or NBC or whoever) there was nothing said
about it. But a few weeks ago there was a short report the german
"ARD Sport Extra" where Dittrich was also interviewed.
He compalained about Llerandi (who finished as 356th); not because he
grabbed for the best split in swimming (awarded with $1500 - 2nd place
got "only" $1000), but he seemed to have grabbed for his feet - and
Dittrich obviously didn't like that ;-).
Dittrich on Llerandi :" Oh yes, he could swim, but he didn't really know
what he was doing". Then sth. about ideal lines and markings.
And he came from the wrong side (Dittrichs nonbreathing side, so he
couldn't keep an eye on him). And finally: "..he was an idiot, I'm sorry
say that ...".

My conclusion: Dittrich seemed to have been very angry (at that moment),
but by far less after finshing. Just forget the whole affair.

   auge

----------------------------------------------------------
 Guenther Augustin, Karlsruhe, Germany
 BITNET:   UKH8@DKAUNI2
 Internet: UKH8@ibm3090.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
 X.400:    UKH8@ibm3090.rz.uni-karlsruhe.dbp.de
Newsgroups: rec.sport.triathlon
From: fossumt@stolaf.edu (Theodore B Fossum)
Subject: Re: Hed disk vs. Hed cx
Organization: St. Olaf College, Northfield, MN
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 01:15:36 GMT

In article <1992Dec17.210712.10576@hpmcaa.mcm.hp.com>, curt@mcm.hp.com (Curt Simkins) writes:
|> In article <1gqe3iINN229@male.EBay.Sun.COM>, warriors@eb5ts4.EBay.Sun.COM (Dave Maycon) writes:
|> |> From what I have read about wind testing, the disk has less drag than
|> |> any spoke wheel out there. Then why are many top pro's use 
|> |> 2x cx's compaired to the standard cx in the from and disk on the rear.
|> |> Does weight have anything to do with it, or does wind tunnel testing
|> |> say that cx is faster than disk.
|> |> 
|> |> Dave
|> |>           
|>    Chances are it was an "Ironman" event that you saw every pro using
|>    2 CX's or Zipp's or the J-Disc companies equivalent.  Solid discs
|>    are illegal in these events.  You will still probably see the 
|>    solid disc rear and 18-24 spoke front combo at most other events.
|> 
|>    Aloha Eh!
|>    Curt

Weight savings is some of the concern with using just the "rim" vs. the disk.  
Another reason is that in some races crosswinds make using a disk difficult (note
that I didn't say impossible).  With that in mind you can see how something that is
fast in the wind-tunnel, does not always translate into something that is fast on
the rode.  One last reason that some people (pros usually are not bound by this),
is that the HED CX, or the J-Disc and ZIPP equivalents are often less expensive then
disk wheels.

Hope it helps.
_______________________________________________________________________________
It is easy to describe the beautiful painting you have created, when there
is no risk anyone will see it.
Write to: fossumt@stolaf.edu
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\   \\\\\\\   \\\\\\\\\\\         \\\\\\\\\\\  \\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\                \      \  \                   \            \
      \          \ \\\\\       \        \\\\\      \              \  
      \          \     \       \        \          \              \
      \          \     \   \\\\\   \\\         \\\\\   \\\        \
      \          \     \   \                   \                  \

"Eat Beaf Stew or go home!!"                    :)
"The best long distance runners eat raw meat, run naked and sleep in the snow"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: arands@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Rolf Arands)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.triathlon
Subject: Shane Esau - please read
Date: 17 Dec 92 20:57:20 GMT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.

Sorry to post a message to a specific person on the net, but I couldn't get
 through any other way.  

Shane,

We talked about the Canadian Ironman.  Was there an application you were 
going to send, or did I misunderstand something along the way?

Drop me a note when you get a chance.

Thanks in advance.

Rolf Arands
From: steveso@wpi.WPI.EDU (Steven C Sousa)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
Subject: Re: Christmas Vacation
Date: 17 Dec 1992 02:42:58 GMT
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu

In article <BzDpG4.Lv2@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> fippjc@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Joe Fipp) writes:
>  Starting Friday, I will be on vacation break, so I will not be doing posts
>for Superstars or Wrestling Challenge for the next three or four weeks.
>				Sorry,
>				   Fippster 6
If there's enough demand, I will volunteer to fill in for Fippster during the
weeks he'll be away. E-mail me or post here to let me know if enough people
would miss the recaps.
					Yours Truly,
					Steve Sousa



Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
From: davez@brahms.udel.edu (David Micha Zlotkin)
Subject: Re: Flair vs. Ramon
Organization: University of Delaware
     I rememebr reading in an earlier post that Henning is married to one of
  Bret Hart's sisters. No idea when it took place.
							Dave
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 18:22:16 GMT
From: bh929@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mike Palij)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
Subject: Re: Wrestlemania Main Event
Date: 15 Dec 1992 19:28:55 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: bh929@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mike Palij)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, jsteeves@ac.dal.ca (Jason Steeves) says:

>In article <1gii34INNp10@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, bh929@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mike Palij) writes:
>> [stuff from a previous post of mine deleted.]
>
>Ramon might have a title in his contract, but I doubt Backlund. If Vince
>was grooming Backlund to be a champ again, he'd be trying harder to generate
>some heat for him. Besides, for Backlund to have that in his contract
>would indicate that Vince came after him to get him to return. Backlund's
>return to the WWF seems to me to be more Backlund's decision and Vince
>saying, "Sure, give it a shot." I can't see Vince chasing Howdy Doody
>saying, "PLEASE come back to us. We NEED you."

This is a good point.  Does anybody know what the story is for
Backlund's return to the WWF?  Given that Backlund was wrestling in
Japan for a short while why did he come back to the WWF?  Couldn't
he make more money in Japan?  Or was it the case that he never got
over with the fans there?  If he flopped then that would explain why
he came to WWF.  If he was over why come back to the WWF unless Vince 
was offering more money.  Note that although Baclund has all of the
charisma of a wet rag he does fit in with the "No Steroid Monsters
'Round Here No More" front that Vince is peddling (I still think
that Backlund needs to have a feud with a monster heel to become
a draw, maybe Flair or Bam Bam Bigelow if its played right).

>   ______       
>  (__  __)     .----------------------. 
> _  / /        | Jason Steeves        |
>( \/ /         | (jsteeves@ac.dal.ca) |
> \__/ ASON     `----------------------'

-- 
Just this person's view of netlife.

======> mike palij ::  bh929@cleveland.freenet.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
From: fippjc@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Joe Fipp)
Subject: Wrestling Challenge
Keywords: Update
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 16:43:00 GMT

  No begining clips or introduction.  Go right to first match.

  Yokozuna vs jobber.  Two Geisha (spelling?) girls in the ring to give flowers
to Yoko.  Yoko wins with reverse quake from the second rope.

  Update: Royal RUmble main event will be Bret Hart vs Razor Ramon.  Winner
of the RR wil get a world title shot at Wrestlemania.  Show clips from
last year's RR.  Bossman came in a punched everyone, later showed Undertaker
slowly walking to the ring.

  Beverly Brothers vs jobbers.  SHowed the Clown in the seats.  Bevs
win with their head spike move.

  Reverend Slick tells us life is tough, like the Royal Rumble.

  Promotional considerations paid by:  Include ICOPRO with Bret Hart walking
through a gym, his title in hand, talking about integrated conditioning.

  Boring Bob Backlund versus jobber.  Clown puts bannana peels on the aisle.
At oone point Bob teases us with what might be an exciting move.  The jobber
is in position to give Bob a reverse monkey flip.  Bob grabs his legs and
picks him up.  Instead of slamming him down or dropping him throat first
on the ropes, Bob just lets him drop to his feet and applies the ever popular
full nelson.  Bob later chicken wing suplexes the guy, puts in a half nelson
to turn the man over, and pins him.  They then shake hands and Bob leaves,
slipping but not falling on a bannana peel, as the clown laughs.

  Kamala wrestles a jobber.  Harvey and Kim Chee berate Kamala, who wins
with a splash.

  Wrestling Superstars interview with Bret Hart is interupted by Heenan who
first calls in the right one, Ric Flair, and then the left one, Razor Ramon.
Ramon flicks Bret with his toothpick and a fight starts.  Perfect runs in
and helps Bret.  In the end, Bret thanks Perfect, who gives no acknowledgement
to him.

  Tatanka wrestles.  Wins with firemen's carry slam.  Gorilla harps on
about ICO-PRO

  Clip of Planet Hollywood and how the WWF superstars went to help them and
presented a check.

  Shawn Michaels had the last match.  No really big moves, won with his
suplex.

Next Week:  Marty Jannetty, the Headshrinkers, the Nasty Boys, Razor Ramon,
and the Undertaker all in action.  Also, an interview with Bret Hart.

  Closing interview with Flair and Ramon had them repeat that "if the right
one don't get you, the left one will" indicating to Bret one of them will
get his title.
From: owentracyjea@bvc.edu (Tracy)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
Subject: Re: Flair vs. Ramon
Date: 18 Dec 92 01:37:36 CST
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA

?: 
>> This is shaping up the same way The Undertaker/Jake Roberts feud came about.
> 
Jason:
> Really???? So you mean that they're going to bring Hart's wife into this,
> have Flair constantly badmouthing her (I don't count the one incident
> on the interview for much), and have Ramon stop Flair from hitting husband
> and wife when they return to the dressing room after a match? Yeah, it
> could happen... and monkeys might fly outta........
> 
-- 

   What are you talking about here?  I remember Jake and his wife being 
involved in something but not with Undertaker.  BTW who was that all with, 
it has since slipped my mind?

   Who was the Powers of Pain "manager"?  And the next question: Is Curt 
Hennig really married?  That's news to me.  If the answer is 'yes' when did 
this take place.  I met him in Sioux City, IA two years ago and not to my 
knowlegde was he married at the time.


Thanks-
Trac
 
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
Tracy "USHL" Owen                              "Earn more sessions by sleaving"
e-mail "SMACK@cs.Stanford.edu"                            -Roxanne
________________________________________________________________________________
                          
                          DENVER UNIVERSITY HOCKEY 
          "...Schmidtke, to Cary, over to Ricci, back to Cary.......
                          HE SHOOTS AND HE SCORES!"
                       
                               _______________
                              / |   | | |   | \
                              | | O |.|.| O | |
                              |[|   | | |   |]|
                              | | O |.|.| O | |
                              \_|___|_|_|___|_/

{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}








Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
From: joepet@statler.engin.umich.edu (Joseph L Petrow)
Subject: Re: Yo! Stromer Supporters...
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 15:24:37 EST
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
Originator: joepet@statler.engin.umich.edu


<<long diatribe by both men deleted>>
 
Tell me, isn't it both bogus and sad to post someone's e-mail
without their permission?  Phil may have been offensive, but at
least he was never this un-ethical.  Still, I say keep Mike and
Phil around, if only to set a bad example for the rest of us.
 
Joe Petrow
joepet@engin.umich.edu
Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
From: fippjc@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Joe Fipp)
Subject: World Wide Wrestling
Keywords: update
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 17:53:57 GMT

  Two things about WWW show:

  They had Eric do analysis on his match with Rude.  They are laying the 
"Kept on fighting" stuff on pretty thick.

  Finally, surprise, surprise!  Van Hammer vs Van Vader in the arm wrestling
semi-finals.  Winner faces Ron Simmons in the finals.  The slip out
twice (Vader about to win, but they lose their grips).  Finally, they
tape their hands together and VAN HAMMER BEATS VADER, though granted it was
only arm wrestling.

  Oh, also announced Steamboat & Douglas to face Windham & Pillman for
the titles at Starcade.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
From: fippjc@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Joe Fipp)
Subject: Superstars of Wrestling
Keywords: Update
Organization: Purdue University
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 17:50:51 GMT

  To start the show, Heenan announces that Jerry "The King" Lawler
will be joining them.  Jerry does a heel announcer.  Saya he is above
everyone here in the WWF, etc., etc...

  Nasty Boys vs Brooklyn Brawler & jobber.  Nasty Boys when with Knobbs
buldogging the guy and then Saggs getting the elbow drop from the top rope.

  Update:  Main Event at Royal Rumble will be Bret Hart vs Razor Ramon.
More importantly: The winner of the Royal RUmble gets a world title shot
at Wrestlemania.
  They show clips of the Rumble two years ago with Hogan coming out, then
clips of last year's with Piper vs Flair and one of Savage coming out.

  Bam Bam Bigelow vs jobber.  Bigelow wins with headbutt from top rope.
The clown hits Bigelow with confetti, Bigelow just walks off.

  Marty Jannety vs Dwayne Gill.  Jannety with fist from top rope.  Clown
nails Jannety with water, Heenen and Lawler laugh.

  Slick preaches.

  Nails vs jobber.  Nails with chokehold/sleeper.  Nailz and Undertaker are
on the cover of the WWF magazine.

  Interview with Bret Hart.  Heenen comes down and introduces Flair, then
Ramon.  Ramon flicks Bret with his toothpick, fight, double team, Mr. Perfect
comes out and Bret and Perfect beat Flair and Ramon off the stage.  Bret
pats Hennig, but Hennig gives no acknowledgement of Bret, he's just pissed
at Flair & Ramon.

  Lance Cassidy vs jobber.  Cassidy wins with clothesline from top rope.

  WWF stars go to "Planet Hollywood" for some childrens' benefit.

  Undertaker vs Barry Horowitz.  Undertaker wins with throat slam.

  Next week: Back to a pretty ordinary line up, with the Big Bossman,
Crush, and Yokozuma wrestling, and announcing some of the participants in
the Royal Rumble.

  End with aftermath interview of Bret Hart.  Mad at Flair & Ramon.

Thoughts:  Well, for Hogan to get a shot at Wrestelmania, he'll have to 
win the Royal Rumble.  I first I thought that Lawler would win the RR, but
there isn't much time to generate heat for him in the title match at
Wrestlemania.  If Ramon wins, that sets up the winner of the RR (a face if
Razor beats Bret) to probably take the title at WM IX.  Any ideas?
Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
From: robertk@bnr.ca (Robert Kaczynski P765)
Subject: Re: WWF Champs
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, BNR-RTP Info Systems
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 15:46:14 GMT

In article <1gb7cuINN26f@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>, bh929@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mike Palij) writes:
|> 
|> WORLD HEAVYWEIGHT           INTERCONTINENTAL              TAG-TEAM
|> "Nature Boy" Buddy Rogers                    |Tarzan Tyler & Luke Graham 
                                                |Baron Scicluna & King Curtis
|> Stan "The Man" Stasiak                                              
                                                |Tony Parisi & Loius Cerdan

The above list is the only people I could not remember.

How far back in time does this list go?  I remember when I was 10
(1976) I shook Tito Santana's hand.  I am still amazed he is still 
around.  How old is he?
Posted-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 02:08:32 -0600
Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 02:07:35 CST
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 92 02:08:32 -0600
From: Otto Heuer #3 <ottoh3@cfsmo.honeywell.com>
To: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
Subject: [GWF] ESPN repeats
Newsgroups: rec.sport.pro-wrestling
Organization: mailEnteringNews at Honeywell SRC


I was just watching a GWF repeat on ESPN from slightly after I had 
stopped watching last year.  Apparently interim commissioner Max
Andrew had been replaced by yet another heel commissioner.  The show
I was watching was just after the heel commissioner had supposedly
been in prison for a month (and had made a face turn).

The face announcer was talking to the (now) face ex-commissioner
during the matches.  The ex-commish was mentioning that wrestler-A
might get head lice from Wrestler-B's boot hitting him on the head,
but that's nothing compared to the constant de-lousings he had to
put up with.  The ex-commish then assured the face-announcer that
he had no head lice, because he had bathed four days ago.  He then
went on to say that they only got to bathe once a wek in prison.

The face announcer then said, "did you make a lot of friends when
you bent over for the soap in prison?"

I had to check the closing credits to make sure it wasn't our
old buddy, Phil Stromer.  :-)

The face ex-commish went on to ask if the face Indian team were
alcoholics, or if that was just a stereotype.

Maybe Vince's angles aren't all that bad...

Naaaaaaaaaaah.

		--Otto "Hack-Man" Heuer