HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: FIRST STORY TO USE A FACE IN TITLES (DR WHO QUIZ)
Date: 2 Sep 92 18:40:08 GMT
Organization: University of Virginia

In article <9209020836.AA16393@cs.utexas.edu> EEC@PORTIA.UMDS.LON.AC.UK (Steve P eec@portia.umds.lon.ac.uk) writes:
>
>yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Dave Shariff Yadallee) writes
>
>> 
>> Correction to quiz 5,  "The Faceless Ones" not "Macra Terror" is the first
>> time the Doctor's face was featuring at the show's opening.
>> 
>
>Incorrect.  "The Macra Terror" was the first story to feature the new
>Patrick Troughton title sequence and, thus, the Doctor's face.
>
>The surviving John Cura telesnaps from this story include 2 of the title 
>sequence. They show the Troughton sequence.  Also if you listen to the audios
>of this story (NOT the commercial releases - the themes were re-dubbed for
>these) you will notice the theme is the slightly jazzier version which
>accompanied the Troughton-face titles.
>
>The telesnaps were published in DWB 97, I think.
>
> ----------------------------------- 
>|  Steve P                    (..)  |
>|  eec@portia.umds.lon.ac.uk   ()   |
> ----------------------------------- 
>

Telesnaps and soundtracks can easily be reedited.  I've heard a soundtrack
recording of "Mission to the Unknown" with the slightly updated theme music
of the Troughton era rather than the Hartnell version.

Do the telesnaps show the title of the story in the correct Troughton
font or are they just of the title sequence?  If they have the font right,
then I might believe this.  If not, I'll accept what others have said
until the day when the story is somehow recovered, should that ever occur.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Long live Sylvester McCoy
From: ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead)
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 15:15:40 PDT
Organization: Paradox Alley F&SF BBS 805-492-8789

juoncatherin@bvc.edu writes:

> Is Sylvester McCoy the right doctor?
> 
> Being new to this network thing, I really don't know much yet.  But one 
> thing that I do know is that Doctow Who is the all time greatest TV show, 
> period.  From 'An Unearthly Child' to 'Rememberance of the Daleks', nearly 
> every episode has been fabulous.  And the doctors (with the due and 
> justified exception of Colin Baker) have averaged about four years apiece.  
> So why should Sylvester McCoy be replaced if Doctor Who starts up again?  
> That seems to be what everyone is saying.  Give the guy a chance!  I think 
> he is one of the three best we've had yet.  He deserves at least another 
> two seasons.  That's all.
> 

I'm sure most of us are in agreement that Sylvester is a very good Doctor,
second only to Tom Baker IMHO, and that he and Sophie Aldred should not
be replaced.  But I think the idiotic powers that be have something else
in mind.  What that is, we may not know for quite some time.
My vote is to bring back Sylvester and Sophie, do you think they'll listen
to me??   Guess not.


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Catherine Beckstead                    ace@kryton.uucp
"Do you want to argue with a can of deodorant that registers
NINE on the Richter scale?"        --Ace, in "Dragonfire"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin)
Subject: Re: Hartnell-Troughton Regeneration Sequence
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 01:20:58 GMT

In article <1992Aug28.053933.21773@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> bv925@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robert J. Corrigan) writes:
>
>I've seen all the regeneration sequences except the first, and
>they've been totally different each time.
>
>What did the first one look like? I DON'T want to spend ~$20 just
>for that one clip on "The Troughton Years!"
>-- 
>                                 .sig on hiatus



That's not all that's on the Troughton Years, there is also three episodes
rarely if ever seen on American television!  Abominable Snowmen;2, 
Enemy of the World;3 and Space Pirates;2 along with more clips from
WEb of Fear, and the X Doctors specials.

AS for the regen sequence, it starts with Hartnell lying on the black
floor of the TARDIS, and his face begins to glow.  The glow gradually
brightens as we hear the TARDIS begin to dematerialize.  
The glow reaches a climax, and his face is no longer distinct, and as
the glow recedes, it forms down onto the face of Patrick Troughton
underneath.  The clip stops just before his face is completely 
utterly distinct.
From: doctor@infopls.chi.il.us (david lucas)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: New(?) Rumours
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 17:00:05 CDT
Organization: INFOPLUS support, Wheeling, IL


> In article <1992Aug26.173958.16509@wam.umd.edu> mrmuon@next05pg2.wam.umd.edu 
> >In article <2737@nlsun1.oracle.nl> gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary  
> >Bradley) writes:
> >>     I doubt Verity Lambert would have time given she now handles
> >> Eldorado (the Beeb's new mega-expensive mega-flop soap opera set in
> >> Spain) full time. And if Eldorado is cancelled (and any sane BBC
> >> controller would cancel it now to at least save face, and minimise loss)
> >> would you let anyone who was involved with it near a new show????
> 
> >A: DW is not a new show.
> >B: She helped create Doctor Who and I would trust her with it more than  
> >_anyone_ else.
> 
> Sorry, Eli.
> 
> A: If DW were to come back, it _would_ be a new show, just like ST:TNG was
> a new show.  A new show with a tremendous back story, but a new show.  There
> will almost definitely be no connection in cast or crew with the first 26
> years of the run.  How much more "new" can you get?
> 
> B: Did you ever hear about her proposed changes when she first floated a bid
> to produce Who?  She expressed her extreme discontent with the direction it
> had taken under Andrew Cartmel and wanted to get away from the dark,
> manipulative Doctor of recent years.  A production philosophy which would
> not allow for "Remembrance of the Daleks" or "Curse of Fenric" would be a
> step backward, IMHO.
> 

 IF you say it isn't  connectted with the past 26 years would The Doctor 
be the same timelord, or would he just be another timelord called the 
doctor. It is my belief, that he would have to be the same timelord or 
the fans(like me) would not except it.
   Dave Lucas



--
doctor@infopls.chi.il.us (david lucas)
Infoplus BBS, +1 708 537 0247, v32bis. Home of Infoplus.
From: yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Dave Shariff Yadallee)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Attention Frank Trumpy and Jean Airey
Date: 29 Aug 92 11:54:50 GMT
Organization: Edmonton Remote Systems #3, Edmonton, AB, Canada

I need to get into e-mail contact with the above people.  E-mail followups
please.

Dave Shariff Yadallee (yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca,
userLIBE@mts.ucs.ualberta.ca)
God Save the Queen, God Bless us All! Remember! Jesus Saves!!
cowboy (n): A 20th Century extension of  the neanderthal caveman.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: pcrossma@cs.ulowell.edu (The Gillrocker)
Subject: Re: "SHADA" US release {Update}
Organization: University of Massachusetts at Lowell Computer Science
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 16:30:27 GMT

In article <1992Aug27.084414.8424@cam-orl.co.uk> daj@cam-orl.co.uk (David A. James) writes:
>They did better than that! John Leeson spent 1 or 2 seasons away from
>the job of doing K9's voice and for Season 17 that role was filled by David
>Brierley, who was therefore the obvious choice of dubbing the lines in the
>reconstituted Shada. Just to stress here, _all_ existing footage has had SFX
>and reassuringly Deadly Dudley style incidental music added. No additional
>scenes have been shot, however. If there is sufficient demand and legally it's
>not too much of a minefield, I am prepared to spend a day
>typing/scanning the script in and posting it for the benefit of those
>whose copies of
>Shada do not/will not contain a copy of it.


YES YES....do type it in....do post it here...YES YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-- 
 _ __ A straight _ line __ may be the shortest distance between two points, 
' )  ) but it is//by no/  ) means the most interesting. -- Dr. Who
 /--' __.  . . //     /    __  _____    _   ______  __.  ____  pcrossma@ulowell
/    (_/|_(_/_</_    (__/ / (_(_) \_)__/_)_/ / / <_(_/|_/ / <_ .ulowell.edu
From: sll28@cc.usu.edu (Lorna Payne)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: ActorWatch
Date: 2 Sep 92 16:05:51 GMT
Organization: Utah State University

In article <01GOAATCKK6A8WVZJS@kinni.acc.uwrf.edu>, steven.k.manfred@UWRF.EDU writes:
> 
> 
> Just in case anyone's interested, I spotted two actors who were once
> guest stars on "Doctor Who" in the two-part CBS mini-series of
> "Jack the Ripper" which concluded tonight.
 
[two connections deleted]
 
> One smallish connection not to Who but to Peter Davison at least,
> Lysette Anthony as the last prostitute killed by the Ripper, who
> people may remember as having played Albert Campion's future wife
> in that Peter Davison series seen in the US on "Mystery!"
 
Yes, but did Mr. Davison ask to play the Ripper for that scene?
(apparently he and Ms. Anthony didn't get along on the Campion set)

     -------------------------------------------------------------
               Lorna Payne
               Certified Math Geek and Grammarian
     -------------------------------------------------------------
     The concept is simply staggering.  Pointless, but staggering.
                         -The Doctor (The Pirate Planet)
     -------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: jstaffor@ux4.cso.uiuc.edu (Justin Dale Stafford)
Subject: Pen Pal?
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 23:05:43 GMT

Although I am not personally interested in Dr. Who, I have a friend who
is, and who does not have access to newsgroups.  If anyone wants to talk
to her, her address is 

   jbenson@heartland.bradley.edu

She would surely appreciate it if you dropped a line.  Thanks.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: ira2p@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Iain Robert Asplin)
Subject: Re: Hartnell-Troughton Regeneration Sequence
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 21:29:36 GMT

In article <1992Aug31.191445.20727@wam.umd.edu> mrmuon@next09pg2.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins) writes:
>In article <1992Aug28.172009.20518@udel.edu> duzan@titan.cis.udel.edu  
>(Gary D. Duzan) writes:
>>    Also, if I remember correctly, the change was accompanied by the  
>TARDIS
>> materialization (materialisation?) sound effects.
>
>As I understand it clip of this survived only without sound, on the  
>"Troughton Years" tape they filled in the absence of sound with the TARDIS  
>sound effect. I don't think this was in the original because, for one  
>thing, the Doctor probably couldn't regenerate and operate the  
>dematerialization control at the same time.

I think the clip dis have sound originally, as you will notice there is
another little buzzing sound at the start of the clip in addition to
the TARDIs effect which sounds to me as if it definitely is of 60sorigin.
From what I understand of the episode, the Doctor hits the demat controls
and then falls on the floor.
Andhey, something not dissimilar to that happens again in "Caves of Anrdozani"
doesn't it?
From: EEC@PORTIA.UMDS.LON.AC.UK (Steve P eec@portia.umds.lon.ac.uk)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: FIRST STORY TO USE A FACE IN TITLES (DR WHO QUIZ)
Date: 2 Sep 1992 03:36:46 -0500
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu


yadallee@ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Dave Shariff Yadallee) writes

> 
> Correction to quiz 5,  "The Faceless Ones" not "Macra Terror" is the first
> time the Doctor's face was featuring at the show's opening.
> 

Incorrect.  "The Macra Terror" was the first story to feature the new
Patrick Troughton title sequence and, thus, the Doctor's face.

The surviving John Cura telesnaps from this story include 2 of the title 
sequence. They show the Troughton sequence.  Also if you listen to the audios
of this story (NOT the commercial releases - the themes were re-dubbed for
these) you will notice the theme is the slightly jazzier version which
accompanied the Troughton-face titles.

The telesnaps were published in DWB 97, I think.

 ----------------------------------- 
|  Steve P                    (..)  |
|  eec@portia.umds.lon.ac.uk   ()   |
 ----------------------------------- 

Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: kguinn@zephyr.cair.du.edu (Kip J. Guinn)
Subject: Re: ActorWatch
Organization: University of Denver
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 92 13:57:59 GMT

In article <01GOBT1CTQW28WW0FV@kinni.acc.uwrf.edu> steven.k.manfred@UWRF.EDU writes:
>
>A dream cross-over crossed the phosphor dots of my television screen
>tonight.
>
>Ever since "The Trial of a Time Lord" I have been struck by how much
>Michael Jayston (the Valeyard) reminded me of Jeremy Brett's portrayal
>of Sherlock Holmes, and I always wanted to see the two of them together
>in something.
>
>and guess what I saw them together in tonight, a new episode of
>Sherlock Holmes on "Mystery!"
>
>Jayston's part was a little on the small side though.  He played
>an Earl and brother to the woman who goes missing in the mystery.
>He has two good scenes, one with the sister and the other with
>Holmes and Watson.
>

Thank God!  I'm glad you mentioned this.  I watched that episode of
"Mystery" (I watch all of them--it's the best show on TV, bar none!),
and Jayston's voice was driving me crazy!  I _knew_ I had heard it
somewhere before--it kept sounding _so_ familiar, but I couldn't place
it.  Bless you!

Kip

(showing once again that Dr. Who has a _tremendous_ influence... :-)


Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: mrmuon@next16pg2.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins)
Subject: Re: Sixth Doctor
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:39:49 GMT

My basic criticism is that both the 1st and 6th Doctors showed a prominent  
grouchy, mean side. But I think William Hartnell did a much better job at  
being likable nonetheless.
From: pedlow@ysidro.uchicago.edu (Steven Pedlow)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Americans and Who
Date: 30 Aug 92 04:11:44 GMT
Organization: Department of Statistics

In article <1992Aug28.074504.16917@unixg.ubc.ca> guth@unixg.ubc.ca (Geoff Guth) writes:
>
>On a related topic, is this Sci-Fi station going to produce any shows
>of their own, or are they merely going to broadcast reruns of Dr. Who,
>Star Trek, etc. (not that I would mind reruns of DW!)
>
>Geoff.

     The Sci-Fi WILL have original programming.  Others know more than
me.  It has been suggested that they will try to make a lot of their own
movies.




Steven Pedlow                     "Do not blaspheme!  It is the gods
Univ. of Chicago                   who weep...  they cannot protect
Dept. of Statistics                us from ourselves"
pedlow@galton.uchicago.edu                -- The Fool in "Ran"
From: "dale clayton" <dale.clayton@canrem.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: what happened?
Date: 25 Aug 92 21:17:37 EST
Reply-To: "dale clayton" <dale.clayton@canrem.com>
Distribution: rec
Organization: Canada Remote Systems

-> DN|  Perhaps an American producer should take it over and do it
-> now... 8)

-> JS| I think I'd rather have it stay dead.

 Me, too. I get ill thinking about it. I hope NBC doesn't get wind of
this. :-/

Regards,
Dale Clayton
------------------------
dale.clayton@canrem.com
--
Canada Remote Systems  - Toronto, Ontario/Detroit, MI
World's Largest PCBOARD System - 416-629-7000/629-7044
From: juoncatherin@bvc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: To writer's of Long Live's
Date: 29 Aug 92 11:15:39 CDT
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA

From <JUONCATHERIN>, known as MC Flash X.  I'm gone till next Friday 
afternoon, but I'll answer all additional mail and posts when I return.  
Just please, let's not argue about which episodes were the best.  We're all 
Who fans here, and isn't that what counts?  Anyway, I'm out like 
yesterday's fish.

"Hardcore will never die" Public Enemy - Lost at Birth
"I'm harder than a hard-on..." Das EFX - East Coast

Peace from the X-man.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Any more of the Shada script?
From: ppugliese@pimacc.pima.edu
Date: 3 Sep 92 20:09:48 -0700
Distribution: rec

In article <1992Sep03.164737.174044@zeus.calpoly.edu>, cshuy@zeus.calpoly.edu (No One Knows) writes:
> In article <1992Sep02.214900.135211@zeus.calpoly.edu> cshuy@zeus.calpoly.edu (No One Knows) writes:
>>At the end of 'Shada-part 4', it says to be continued next posting.
>>Anyone seen that next posting?
>>
> And could someone please e-mail me the next posting?  My newsfeed got flaky 
> when it was posted and I never got it.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> -- 

Well this site never received 'part 5' so I suspect that it may have
never gone out. Assuming that there *really* was supposed to be a part
5 after all.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: New(?) Rumours
From: ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead)
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 92 09:55:06 PDT
Organization: Paradox Alley F&SF BBS 805-492-8789

doctor@infopls.chi.il.us (david lucas) writes:

> 
> > In article <1992Aug26.173958.16509@wam.umd.edu> mrmuon@next05pg2.wam.umd.ed
> > A: If DW were to come back, it _would_ be a new show, just like ST:TNG was
> > a new show.  A new show with a tremendous back story, but a new show.  Ther
> > will almost definitely be no connection in cast or crew with the first 26
> > years of the run.  How much more "new" can you get?

Well we could go 80 years in the future so as to get away from the old show..
but I don't think that would help.  <evil smirk>

> > 
> > B: Did you ever hear about her proposed changes when she first floated a bi
> > to produce Who?  She expressed her extreme discontent with the direction it
> > had taken under Andrew Cartmel and wanted to get away from the dark,
> > manipulative Doctor of recent years.  A production philosophy which would
> > not allow for "Remembrance of the Daleks" or "Curse of Fenric" would be a
> > step backward, IMHO.
> > 
> 
>  IF you say it isn't  connectted with the past 26 years would The Doctor 
> be the same timelord, or would he just be another timelord called the 
> doctor. It is my belief, that he would have to be the same timelord or 
> the fans(like me) would not except it.
>    Dave Lucas

I would say it has to be the same timelord and definatly connected to the past
26 years.  I would NOT want a Doctor Who:The Next Generation.  There is
no need.  If it is a new Doctor....so be it, we've been through new Doctor's
before...7 times, I believe.

-Cathy

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Catherine Beckstead                    ace@kryton.uucp
"Do you want to argue with a can of deodorant that registers
NINE on the Richter scale?"        --Ace, in "Dragonfire"
From: aa634@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bill White)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Americanising of the UK, Now: British TV in North America
Date: 2 Sep 1992 16:33:12 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aa634@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Bill White)
NNTP-Posting-Host: thor.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, dave@admiral.uucp (Dave Litchman) says:

>
>Now, in a related vein, did you know that there was an american version of
>Fawlty Towers? Sad, but true. Bea Arthur played the female version of Basil
>Fawlty. I have never seen this series, but I'm told it bombed almost as badly
>as it deserved.
>

Unfortunately, I did see it, once (i wasn't stupid enough to make the
same mistake twice). The show was called "Amanda's Place" and it was
as bad as it's reputed to be.

-- 
Bill White, aa634@Cleveland.freenet.edu OR aa037@Medina.Freenet.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------
       Assistant Sysop, Cleveland & Medina County Free-net's
                  Science Fiction and Fantasy Sig
From: juoncatherin@bvc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: The D.W.F.C. of A.
Date: 26 Aug 92 17:02:29 CDT
Organization: Buena Vista College, Storm Lake, IA

A long time ago, far far away...

I have had the following experience with D.W.F.C. of A.  Two years ago I 
sent $5 for the Dr. Who newsletter, pin, etc.  Received nothing for one 
full year, then only one issue of the D.W.F.C. of A. newsletter.  Since 
then, nothing!!!

Does anybody know about a REAL Doctor Who club?  Fill me in!
Peace out, MC Flash X

Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: bv925@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robert J. Corrigan)
Subject: Hartnell-Troughton Regeneration Sequence
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, (USA)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 92 05:39:33 GMT


I've seen all the regeneration sequences except the first, and
they've been totally different each time.

What did the first one look like? I DON'T want to spend ~$20 just
for that one clip on "The Troughton Years!"
-- 
                                 .sig on hiatus
From: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Dr Who film reported official!
Date: 2 Sep 92 12:33:07 GMT
Reply-To: gbradley@uks197.Berkeley.EDU (Gary Bradley)


   Apologies if this is old news! I heard on the Children's TV news
program recently (the one in the slot that was for years occupied by
John Craven's Newsround) that the Dr Who film is now official and WILL
go ahead very soon. Choice of Doctor is still to be decided, but the
favourite at time of report was Dudley Moore (!). Take this news as you will.

+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| Gary Bradley        |   "You receive a love letter from me and |
| ORACLE Corp, UK     |                  you're f*cked forever!" |
| Edinburgh, SCOTLAND |        - Frank Booth ("Blue Velvet")     |
+---------------------+------------------------------------------+
| "God damn the censor man"                                      |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
From: reno@cps.msu.edu (Gerald L Jr Reno)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: VIDEO CERTIFICATES
Date: 30 Aug 92 20:01:14 GMT
Reply-To: reno@cps.msu.edu (Gerald L Jr Reno)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Michigan State University
Originator: reno@indian.cps.msu.edu

In article <17ik0aINNmj5@oak10.doc.ic.ac.uk> ijp@doc.ic.ac.uk (Ian Palmer) writes:
>In article <1992Aug26.223726.17479@news.iastate.edu> trump@iastate.edu (The Trumpster.) writes:
>
>#define pedantic_mode
>
>I would guess that this is not strictly true. It is illegal to supply
>an 18 video (etc) to anyone under 18, but I would not say (although I
>am not sure) that the under 18 personage watching an 18 film is
>breaking the law. This would be in keeping with other age related
>laws, eg. it's not illegal for a 12 year old to smoke a cig., but to
>sell/supply a 12 year old with a cig. is illegal. Same with under-age
                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>sex, etc.
 ^^^
>
>#undefine pedantic_mode

#redefine pedantic_mode

So, it is illegal to supply an under-age person with sex, but
okay for the under-age person to have sex? What strange laws
these British people have.

#reundefine pedantic_mode

Jerry Reno (cunning linguist) reno@cps.msu.edu
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
From: mrmuon@next16pg2.wam.umd.edu (Eli John Hawkins)
Subject: Re: Americanising of the UK, Now: British TV in North America
Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 18:10:20 GMT

In article <25508@castle.ed.ac.uk> scott@festival.ed.ac.uk (Scott Larnach)  
writes:
> Similarly, I have heard (though I do not remember where) that "bloody"
> is a corrupt, or euphemistic, form of "by our lady".

I'm pretty sure bloody is short for "bloody Christ"