HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: palmer@sfu.ca (Leigh Palmer)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: a Soft Gamma Repeater does it again, OBSERVATIONS REQUESTED
Date: 22 Jul 92 17:58:27 GMT
Organization: Simon Fraser University

In article <1992Jul20.185943.26063@cco.caltech.edu> palmer@cco.caltech.edu
(David Palmer) writes:
>
>I have a better position on the soft gamma repeater 1900+14, which
>was reported (in the July 16 Compton Observatory Science Report
>by Kouveliotou et al.) to be active again.
>
>According to Mazets et al.  (Sov. Astron. Lett. 5(6), Nov-Dec 1979, p 343)
>The error box for this source has vertices (in 1950 epoch degrees) of:
>
>RA      dec
>285.27  14.40
>285.55  12.83
>284.87  16.50
>285.19  14.63
>
>This is a long, skinny trapezoid about 4 degrees long and a few tenths
>of a degree wide.  (4 degrees is about 35 mm long on the film when
>photographed with a 500 mm focal length lens.)

If you place zeta and epsilon aquilae centrally symmetrically in the field 
of your binoculars you will be more or less centered on the error box. Note
that it is much smaller than the uncertainty in the position of the object
identified by BATSE.

Leigh
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: ledlow@triton.unm.edu (;-))
Subject: Re: ST-4 & PHOTOMETRY
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 92 17:10:29 GMT
Organization: University of New Mexico

In article <1992Jul26.231056.7584@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> bx372@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mr. Arthur J. Musgrove) writes:
>
>In a previous article, malcolm@hpwin052.uksr.hp.com (Malcolm Porter) says:
>
>believe that this should be accurate enough for a lot of applications..
>Another problem is the small field of view...  In order to get a good
>reduction of noise, light pollution etc.  the comparison star should be on
>the same shot with the ccd chip...
>
I have had some experience doing differential photometry here at UNM. In 
observing some RS-CVn systems where the comparison star is in the same
field as the variable, we have achieved S/N of > 500, with RMS errors of
less than 1%.  We were using an RCA CCD chip too, which are quite noisy.

--michael


Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
Subject: Re: Heavy Boots
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 06:36:52 GMT

schumach@convex.com (Richard A. Schumacher) writes:
: In <1992Jul30.161658.26111@news.iastate.edu> partee@iastate.edu (Jonathan F Partee) writes:
: 
: [recounts that 48 out of 168 people in a course titled "Physics 324 - 
: Modern Physics for Engineers" did not know that a pen dropped on the
: Moon would fall to the Moon]

To make it even worse - I am willing to bet that, if you checked where
the students who gave the wrong answers went to high school, you would
find that a disproportionate number attended US schools.

Bill
From: Richard.Alan.Haver@dartmouth.edu (Richard Alan Haver)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: Full/New Moon Help!!!
Date: 22 Jul 92 19:44:32 GMT
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

full may 6th 1993 and new may 21, 1993.
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: gmcquary@Ingres.COM (George F. McQuary)
Subject: Books on building a telescope
Reply-To: gmcquary@Ingres.COM (George F. McQuary)
Organization: Ask Computer Systems Inc., Ingres Division, Alameda CA 94501
Distribution: net
Date: 29 Jul 92 22:34:33 GMT

I'm looking at building an 8 inch Newtonian. I've been reading books at
the library, but now that I've dropped in at Chabot's mirror making class
in Oakland, I'd have to say that the body designs I've been seeing are a
little bit outdated (books from seventies).

Can anyone recommend a recent book on construction?

Please reply to me and I'll summarise if I get any responses.
--
George F. McQuary 
"He is mad, bad and dangerous to know." -Lady Caroline Lamb
From: john@newave.mn.org (John A. Weeks III)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: the San Jose Mercury News explains weighlessness
Date: 24 Jul 92 02:53:40 GMT
Distribution: sci
Organization: Newave Communications, Ltd, Lake Wobegon, MN

In <FY.92Jul22112943@hardwick.lucid.com> fy@lucid.com (Frank Yellin) writes:
> The following article appeared in the Q&A section of the San Jose
> (California) Mercury News on Sunday, July 19, 1992. [ Story Deleted ]
> How many mistakes can you find in these four sentences?
> The newspaper posted a retraction and correction this morning (July 22).

Maybe they looked in the same book that Dan Quayl(e) used for his Mars info.

-john-

-- 
==============================================================================
John A. Weeks III		(612) 942-6969		    john@newave.mn.org
Newave Communications, Ltd.			    ..!uunet!tcnet!newave!john
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: clarke@acme.ucf.edu (Thomas Clarke)
Subject: Re: Rebound faster than escape velocity? (was Re: Heavy Boots)
Organization: University of Central Florida
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 13:45:28 GMT

In article <1992Jul31.071104.1@fnalo.fnal.gov> higgins@fnalo.fnal.gov (Bill  
Higgins-- Beam Jockey) writes:
> In article <1992Jul31.071337.14623@omen.UUCP>, caf@omen.UUCP (Chuck Forsberg  
WA7KGX) writes:
> > In article <1992Jul30.161658.26111@news.iastate.edu> partee@iastate.edu  
(Jonathan F Partee) writes:
> >>We read an article claiming that the average American does not know the 
> >>correct answer to the following question:
> >>
> >>If a pen is dropped on a moon, will it:
> >>A) Float away
> >>B) Float where it is
> >>C) Fall to the surface of the moon
> >>
> > Were any of your students sharp enough to choose a moon light
> > enough that one could drop the pen hard enough that its rebound
> > would exceed escape velocity?  It would have been a matter of
> > honor in my 3rd semester physics recitation section at RPI.
> 
> You woulda flunked if *I'd* been the T.A., Chuck-- unless you
> specified that the pen has an elasticity greater than 1.  
> 
> (See the film *The Absent-Minded Professor* for a smooth line of
> patter on this subject.)
> 
> In plain language, there isn't any moon *that* light.
> 
Your wiseacre student would then come back with 

"I used definition 7a of drop (vt):
   7a: to bring down with a shot or a blow.
You may have meant definition 1:
    1: to let fall: cause to fall;
but you failed to specify." 

From my spiffy on-line Webster. :-)
--
Thomas Clarke
Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central FL
12424 Research Parkway, Suite 300, Orlando, FL 32826
(407)658-5030, FAX: (407)658-5059, clarke@acme.ucf.edu
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: rainbow@mydland.Eng.Sun.COM (Queen of Infinite Space)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: details on Persiad meteor showers wanted
Date: 30 Jul 1992 18:54:16 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.  Mt. View, Ca.
Distribution: world
Reply-To: rainbow@mydland.Eng.Sun.COM (Queen of Infinite Space)
NNTP-Posting-Host: mydland

When are the best viewing nights for the upcoming Persiads meteor shower?

Rainbow

--
----------
"that is really what I think
and by the way, which one's Pink?"
	   -Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: benge@sol.acs.unt.edu (Benge Raymond Doyle)
Subject: Re: An Observation Question.
Organization: University of North Texas
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 19:18:41 GMT

turner@bigbang.astro.indiana.edu (George Wm Turner) writes:


>>What is our real range of vision?
>>                          Thanks for enlightening me!

>the farthest thing the naked eye can detect is the andromeda galaxy
>which is 2,100 light years distance. on a very dark night it appears 
>as a dim cloudly patch; i usually first think of it as an odd cloud

Try 2,100,000 light years.


		Ray Benge
From: higgins@fnalo.fnal.gov (Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: Astronomy Lab BETA __Did ANYBODY ge through???
Date: 31 Jul 92 10:33:27 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

In article <1575clINN82m@grapevine.EBay.Sun.COM>, wag@georwell.EBay.Sun.COM (Rick Wagoner) writes:
> 
> I'm wannabe BETA tester who's had his email bounce as high as a
> congressman's check... I've seen _tons_ of bounces to this group
> and several others.
> 

Who's this "astronomy beta test" author anyway?  Little Craig Shergold?

     O~~*           /_) ' / /   /_/ '  ,   ,  ' ,_  _           \|/
   - ~ -~~~~~~~~~~~/_) / / /   / / / (_) (_) / / / _\~~~~~~~~~~~zap!
 /       \                          (_) (_)                    / | \
 |       |     Bill Higgins   Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
 \       /     Bitnet:     HIGGINS@FNAL.BITNET
   -   -       Internet:  HIGGINS@FNAL.FNAL.GOV
     ~         SPAN/Hepnet:      43011::HIGGINS
From: yaron@astro.as.utexas.edu (Yaron Sheffer)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: Supermassive stars and HD limit (was Big Bang...)
Date: 23 Jul 92 21:03:35 GMT
Distribution: sci
Organization: University of Texas, McDonald Observatory

In article <1992Jul23.082922.13941@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> njzy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu (T. Joseph Lazio, Cornell University) writes:
> This is exactly what I was trying to describe.  Type II supernovae are
> "strongly associated with HII regions."  Type Ia supernovae show a more
> spherical distribution around galaxies, but are still well associated
> with galaxies.  However, QSOs are seen many arcminutes from galaxies;
> are there supernovae reported this far from galaxies?
>
No, there aren't any, but this is not relevant since according to Tom the
QSOs got there by traveling after the supernova explosions. Now here's a more
relevant question to answer: Do QSOs have supernovae in them? Answer: Yes!
For instance, QSO 1059+730 was photographed with and without a supernova
explosion right next to the image of the core. An absolute magnitude of
about -18 has been derived from the (cosmological) redshift of the QSO,
i.e., in line with the QSO being the bright core of a far away galaxy.

I recall a much earlier situation with Stephen's Quintet, where supposedly
four higher redshift galaxies are 'interacting' with a fifth lower redshift
guy. I think the supernova appeared in the higher z guys and its brightness
was in line with their larger cosmological distances (ie not at the distance
indicated by the lower z galaxy).

So, yes, in a different way, supernovae indicate cosmological QSO redshifts.

Yaron

> T. Joseph Lazio
> 42 deg. 20' 08" N              |              STOP RAPE
                                                ^^^^^^^^^ of girls by guys?
                                                START RAPE of guys by girls!
From: anderson@fermi.phys.ualberta.ca (Warren G. Anderson)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: On the formation of black holes
Date: 21 Jul 92 19:48:50 GMT
Distribution: sci
Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada

In article <83854@netnews.upenn.edu> weemba@sagi.wistar.upenn.edu (Matthew P  
Wiener) writes:

> That the external observer sees infalling material disappear in a finite
> time, contrary to what was believed three decades ago, because people
> didn't yet understand the difference between time and t.

In fact, this is not true for a classical source, at least, not if 
"disappear" means "no emissions can reach a stationay observer".

I finally got around to looking in the suggested section of MTW. I guess I
misunderstood what you were saying. What you say above is true. However,
the stationary observer never does see anything cross the event horizon
(which is what I was saying). It's simply that the intensity fall off due
to the space-time curvature is so rapid that 'virtually' nothing 
escaping from a test particle close enough to the event horizon reaches
a stationary observer. Why didn't you just say this instead of saying
that my argument using Penrose diagrams was going awry because I was
using Schwarzschild time and such? In the end, it turns out we are both
right, just talking about slightly different things. 

--
########################## _`|'_ ##############################################
##  Warren G. Anderson     |o o| "... for its truth does not matter, and is  ##
##  Dept. of Physics       ( ^ )  unimaginable." -J. Ashbery, The New Spirit ##
##  University of Alberta  /\-/\      (anderson@fermi.phys.ualberta.ca)      ##
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: martin@space.ualberta.ca (Martin Connors)
Subject: Re: HELP NEEDED ON CHAOS!!!
Reply-To: martin@space.ualberta.ca (Martin Connors)
Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 15:18:27 GMT

In article <26cmzsn@lynx.unm.edu> aameko@spectre.unm.edu (Agbeli Ameko)  
writes:HELP NEEDED ON CHAOS!!!
> -- 
A good starting point is:
Chaotic Dynamics in the Solar System by Jack Wisom, in Icarus v. 72,
pages 241-275. Based on a prize lecture, this article is not too  
mathematical. Also check out recent issues of Nature - in one there is an  
article on the asteroid Helga by Milani and Nobili.
Martin Connors
Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: yaron@astro.as.utexas.edu (Yaron Sheffer)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: Death of the Meta model (was:Re: Standard model of QSOs)
Keywords: Big Bang, redshift, cosmology, quasars, galaxies.
Date: 22 Jul 92 17:23:50 GMT
Organization: University of Texas, McDonald Observatory

In article <76169@ut-emx.uucp> yaron@astro.as.utexas.edu (Yaron Sheffer) writes:
>If anybody has noticed
>that his Meta thing has been given a final blow when compared to the
>Nature paper of 1991 September 26 about X-ray quasars, please e-mail me
>a line with your opinions. Thanks!

Sorry!
On second thought, please continue to ignore this post and do not e-mail
me about this topic. I should not have posted this to begin with, since it
deviates from the spirit of mutual discussions in the frame of this newsgroup.
(Which makes me wonder... do we need sci.astro.d for long discussions/debates?)

Yaron Sheffer

Newsgroups: sci.astro
From: tordm@vana (Tord Malmgren)
Subject: SETI
Reply-To: TordM@VanD.PhySto.SE
Organization: Department of Physics, University of Stockholm -- Sweden
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 12:08:36 GMT


 Hello all,

  is there anybody who know just HOW the SETI searches for signals? I mean,
which stars do they scan, clusters, galaxies and so on? Which frequenses do
they scan? How do they analyse the "noice" they get? Is there any FTP-site
which have stored "noice" for public to take a look at? Maybe there are some
good references around??

 I read "The Physical Universe -- An Introduction to Astronomy" by Frank H.
Shu, but it just "gobbles" a lot with not much fact. Also, I read "Exploration
of The Universe" by George O. Abell, David Morrison and Sidney C. Wolff, but
the same with that -- no "deeper" fact about SETI. So, if there is any better
references I'd appreciate it very much!





---------------+--------------------------------
 Tord Malmgren | InterNet: TordM@VanD.PhySto.SE | These opinions are my own,
               | BITNet  : TordM@SESUF51        | and NOT of this department!
---------------+--------------------------------
 Department of Physics, University of Stockholm 
Xref: sparky sci.astro:8291 sci.space:10732 news.answers:2233
From: robertj@mars (Robert Jongbloed)
Subject: NT Telescope & Spherical Aberation
Organization: Uni of Newcastle, Australia
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 05:41:50 GMT

I heard on a science programme here (Beyond 2000) that the New Technolgy
telescope at La Cilla has exactly the same problem as Hubble: spherical
aberration in the main mirror. The difference in this case being that the
shape adjustment jacks will be able to compensate.

Anyone know anything more about it?


--
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Robert Jongbloed              | University, where the real world is something
 robertj@mars.newcastle.edu.au | to be understood but not be a part of. 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: hmai@namu01.gwdg.de (Holger Mai 29122129)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: Re: IAU Circulars
Date: 31 Jul 92 06:19:56 GMT
	<1992Jul30.153513.28118@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Organization: Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Germany

In article <1992Jul30.153513.28118@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gsh7w@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy) writes:
   In article <1992Jul29.125008.1367@weigele.de>
   schnuffi.weigele.de!martin (Martin Weigele) writes: 
   #Are they accessible in electronic form, does anyone know?

   Yes, but they cost money, just like the paper circulars. Brian Marsden
   is the person to contact. I beleive his e-mail address is on the
   bottom of each circular.

marsden@cfa or green@cfa (.span, .bitnet, or harvard.edu)




   --
   -Greg Hennessy, University of Virginia
    USPS Mail:     Astronomy Department, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475 USA
    Internet:      gsh7w@virginia.edu  
    UUCP:		...!uunet!virginia!gsh7w
--
 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 | Holger Mai | Waldweg 4,             | E-Mail: hmai@namu01.gwdg.de         |
 |            | D-3400 Goettingen      |         hmai@go.ovum.ka.sub.org     |
 |            | Tel. 49-(0)551-42199   | Fido:   Holger Mai @ 2:245/45       |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xref: sparky sci.astro:8292 sci.space:10733 news.answers:2234
From: gwc@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Greg F Walz Chojnacki)
Subject: Re: First Telescope: Astroscan, C4.5
Originator: gwc@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Reply-To: gwc@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 21:12:01 GMT

From article <Bs0srC.DEM@cgl.ucsf.edu>, by bic@cgl.ucsf.edu (Bruce Cohen%CGL):
> I am interested in buying my first telescope.  Any comments on the Edmunds
> Scientific Astro scan would be appreciated.  I am also considering (the
> most costly, less portable) Celestron C4.5 Newtonian.
>
If I recall the Celestron correctly, it shares with the Astroscan the
problem of low focal ratio, which renders it unsuitable for high-magnification
observing (planets, double stars). The primary advantage it has over the
Astroscan is it is more readily adapted for astrophotography -- not a 
big deal for a beginner's scope, perhaps. The adaptation I refer to is an
equatorial mount -- which makes it much less portable.)

The Astroscan is a GREAT 1st scope, IMHO. It's far more rugged than one
should expect a telescope be, has a wide field, is extremely portable and
easy to use. The suggested retail price has shot up over the years, but
it's discounted by a few places to a reasonable price, as I recall. It gets 
my vote.

Greg
From: slndw@cc.usu.edu
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Subject: persied watcher needs info
Date: 28 Jul 92 21:35:49 GMT
Organization: Utah State University

Hello out there.


Anybody know the best dates to watch the persied
meteor shower this year?

Please E-mail me at
 in%"slndw@cc.usu.edu"

Thanks alot
 --Mark Taratoot
   Watershed Science Unit
   Department of Forestry
   Utah State University

Newsgroups: sci.astro.fits
From: bschlesinger@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov (Barry Schlesinger)
Subject: Re: FITS error test files
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41    
Keywords: FITS, software, readers
Organization: NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 13:59:00 GMT

In article <pence.711826605@heawk1>, pence@heawk1.gsfc.nasa.gov ( William Pence) writes...
> 
>I tried reading the test defective FITS files  generated by Barry
>Schlesinger (see previous post to this newsgroup) to see if the FITSIO
>subroutine package detected the errors.  I tried reading each pseudo
>FITS file with a simple program that just lists the header of a FITS
>file.  The following list shows the error message that was returned by
>FITSIO for each file.   FITSIO did very well and found all the errors,
>except one:  it didn't complain if the first keyword was 'SIMPLE =
>W';  it just assumed that if SIMPLE was not true, then it must be false.
>I'll add this check to the next version of FITSIO.
> 
>-Bill Pence
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>List of error responses generated by FITSIO when trying to read test defective
>FITS files generated by Barry Schlesinger
> 
>FILENAME       FITSIO RESPONSE
>--------       ---------------
>good.tst
>        No errors detected; OK since this is a legal FITS file
> 
>different.tst:
>	Error Status Returned :  210
>	Missing "= " in cols 9-10
> 

This is something of an understatement, as the file isn't close to 
FITS.

> ... [results for other files] ...
.
>shuffle.tst
>	Error Status Returned :  222
>	BITPIX keyword not found

Actually there is a BITPIX keyword in the file, just in the wrong 
place.  But a reader shouldn't be expected to find it.

>latenaxis.tst
>	Error Status Returned :  223
>	NAXIS  keyword not found 

As above.

>endequal.tst
>	No errors detected;  OK since this is a legal FITS file (?).

Not exactly.  The = in column 9 of the END card image shouldn't be
there.  Readers probably should provide a warning.  Validation
software certainly should.  As is noted in the README.FIRST, Don Wells
reports that some readers have crashed on this syntax. 

				Barry Schlesinger
				FITS Support Office
From: hyatt@tsc.cs.unc.edu (Brant Hyatt)
Newsgroups: sci.astro.fits
Subject: FITS->gif,jpg,tiff etc
Keywords: FITS gif jpg
Date: 30 Jul 92 21:42:29 GMT

Does anyone know of or have written a utility that converts
fits to any other format?


Thanks,

Brant Hyatt
brant@sloth.astro.unc.edu
From: bschlesinger@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov (Barry Schlesinger)
Newsgroups: sci.astro.fits
Subject: Re: FITS error test files
Summary: Test prototype only
Keywords: FPCT
Date: 21 Jul 92 19:04:00 GMT
Organization: NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <20JUL199216523472@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov>, bhill@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov (Robert S. Hill) writes...
> 
>Inquiring minds want to know:  is the FPCT itself available?
> 

	A prototype of the first build is available for testing, to check for 
portability and errors.  The first build is limited to 

	Primary HDU
	Integer data
	Twos complement

	Copies can be obtained from the FITS Support Office

					Barry Schlesinger
Newsgroups: sci.astro.fits
From: pence@heawk1.gsfc.nasa.gov ( William Pence)
Subject: Re: FITS error test files
Keywords: FITS, software, readers 
Organization: Goddard Space Flight Center
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1992 17:36:45 GMT


I tried reading the test defective FITS files  generated by Barry
Schlesinger (see previous post to this newsgroup) to see if the FITSIO
subroutine package detected the errors.   I tried reading each pseudo
FITS file with a simple program that just lists the header of a FITS
file.  The following list shows the error message that was returned by
FITSIO for each file.   FITSIO did very well and found all the errors,
except one:  it didn't complain if the first keyword was 'SIMPLE =
W';  it just assumed that if SIMPLE was not true, then it must be false.
I'll add this check to the next version of FITSIO.

-Bill Pence
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

List of error responses generated by FITSIO when trying to read test defective
FITS files generated by Barry Schlesinger

FILENAME       FITSIO RESPONSE
--------       ---------------
good.tst
        No errors detected; OK since this is a legal FITS file

different.tst:
	Error Status Returned :  210
	Missing "= " in cols 9-10

nosimple.tst
	Error Status Returned :  221
	SIMPLE keyword not found

simplew.tst
        No errors detected;  didn't detect SIMPLE = W;  FITSIO should
        have complained about this.

simplef.tst
        No errors detected;  didn't complain about SIMPLE = F; OK

bitpixq2
	Error Status Returned :  211
	Illegal BITPIX keyword value

bitpix13
	Error Status Returned :  211
	Illegal BITPIX keyword value

noequal.tst
	Error Status Returned :  210
	Missing "= " in cols 9-10

qin10.tst
	Error Status Returned :  210
	Missing "= " in cols 9-10

extraxis.tst
	No errors detected;  OK since this is a legal FITS file

missaxis.tst
	Error Status Returned :  224
	NAXISnnn keywords not found

simple2nd.tst
	Error Status Returned :  210
	Missing "= " in cols 9-10

shuffle.tst
	Error Status Returned :  222
	BITPIX keyword not found

latenaxis.tst
	Error Status Returned :  223
	NAXIS  keyword not found

endequal.tst
	No errors detected;  OK since this is a legal FITS file (?).
Newsgroups: sci.astro.fits