HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: ss@wpi.WPI.EDU (Scott Streeter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Babylon5 - What is the air date?
Date: 3 Jan 93 19:14:00 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609-2280
NNTP-Posting-Host: wpi.wpi.edu
In-reply-to: agonzale@wam.umd.edu's message of 3 Jan 93 18:05:36 GMT

>>>>> On 3 Jan 93 18:05:36 GMT, agonzale@wam.umd.edu (Cleopatra Jones) said:


agonzale> Does anyone know what the airdate is for Babylon5, EST time?

TV Guide says, Syndicated movie special, Feb 22nd. Check local listings.

--
 Scott Streeter                             Visit the Star Wars Archive at
 ss@wpi.wpi.edu                             wpi.wpi.edu       130.215.24.1
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: grant@tiamat.ucs.sfu.ca (Grant Dimock)
Subject: Re: Red Dwarf
Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 22:12:13 GMT

In article <1992Dec19.214102.45801@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>  
2puhsagely@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes:
> Is there any fans of the British TV show Red Dwarf.

You may want to look in alt.tv.red-dwarf.  There are many very lively  
discussions there.  Just thought if any of you are interested.
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
From: markf@atlastele.com (Mark Ferris)
Subject: Re: Does SciFi Channel cut episodes????
Organization: Atlas Telecom Inc.
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 20:13:47 GMT

In article <1992Dec25.180034.4267@news2.cis.umn.edu> donnell@tuna.micro.umn.edu (BogusMan) writes:
>In article <1hf1ulINNqtk@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> bs895@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Terri M. Librande) writes:
>>
>Look at who owns them. <USA network>. Look at the "to the bone" cutting
>that USA does. Sci-Fi channel is still better than that!
>

I don't watch the Sci-Fi channel, and I only watch USA to catch QL
re-runs, but something I've started to notice the past couple weeks,
and my wife agreed with me that she sees also, is that certain parts
of QL seem to be "speeded up."  Although it seems to happen only at times
when the action is moving fast, it is very noticeable, and I was wondering
if anybody else had noticed it.  I've never seen any other station pull
a stunt like that (although I know that radio stations do some magic to
speed up records without affecting the audio quality).

I've seen this on two TV sets, so I know it's not a byproduct of a
particular tube.

At times this does make the show funny.  The "Camikaze Kid" episode
was a little like the 6 million dollar man when Sam had to jump out
of the way of the bad guy's speeding car.  He almost seemed to vanish
out of the picture he moved so fast.

I get my revenge on the USA network, though, because I can REALLY speed
up those commercials on my VCR. :-)


-- 
Mark Ferris                         EMAIL: markf@atlastele.com
Atlas Telecom                       VOICE: [USA] 1+503.228.1400 x242
4640 SW Macadam Ave.                FAX1:  [USA] 1+503.228.0368
Portland, OR 97201                  FAX2:  [USA] 1+503.225.5518
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: mlj44080@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Michael Lee Jacobs)
Subject: Re: QL: ANIMATED(Coyote)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 17:25:58 GMT

You dont remember "Wile E. Coyote...certified GENIUS...my card" episodes????
those were absolutely priceless, wherein he showed us Road Runner anatomy etc.

-- 
"Salam and good evening to you sir.  Welcome to Agribah, land of mystery
of enchantment, and the best deals this side of the river Jordan, come on down"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Fans of Quark!
From: jenkins@local.host (Lisa Jenkins)
Date: 22 Dec 92 12:27:14 -0600
Reply-To: jenkins@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu
Organization: Organization, City, State, etc.


Hi.  I just couldn't believe it when I walked into the newsgroup and saw
people posting about _Quark_, one of my all-time favorite SF comedy shows
when I was a kid (my other favorite show was _Winnie the Pooh_).

My favorite _Quark_ episode was the one with the black hole ("Look at all
the colors?  Isn't it beautiful?").  In fact, I think I memorized it (I
taped it to audio with an open mic when it first ran).  I had also vaguely
remembered a scene from another episode where the whole crew hid in the
shower to make plans on distroying the "ultimate computer" which had been
installed on the ship.

But now I am the proud "owner" of all _Quark_ episodes, admittedly out of 
order and possibly edited, when they were re-shown on Showtime's HA! some
years back.  (HA! has since merged with HBO's Comedy Channel to become
Comedy Central where they make even better stuff like _Mystery Science
Theater 3000_, now my number one favorite SF comedy show.)

If you're interested in a copy of the _Quark_ episodes (admittedly out
of order, possibly edited, and includes all the dorky HA! commercials
they'd repeat fifteen times an hour), send me mail and possibly we can
strike a deal!

PS--We're having some problems with mail at my Internet site right now.
If you reply to this message and it bounces, send mail to 
"jenkins@mhd.moorhead.msus.edu" instead.


       ,     ,                  Lisa Jenkins                     _
      (\____/)          jenkins@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu          [ ]
       (_oo_)                                                  (   )
         (O)          *-*-* "BITE ME -- IT'S FUN!" *-*-*        |>|
       __||__    \)                                          __/===\__
    []/______\[] /       1603 Thirteenth Street South       //| o=o |\\
    / \______/ \/            Moorhead, Minnesota          <]  | o=o |  [>
   /    /__\                      56560-3734                  \=====/ 
  (\   /____\                                                / / | \ \
              (Tom Servo by Brian Heil/used with permission)<_________>
From: wixer!cactus.org!wixer!pro-smof.cts.com!rfletcher@cactus.org (Robert Fletcher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL in Entertainment Weekly
Date: 25 Dec 1992 12:15:53 -0600
Organization: The SMOF-BBS: Science Fiction Online Since 1985 [512-467-7317]
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

  Do you know were Star Trek set in this list?
----
ProLine:  rfletcher@pro-smof
Internet: rfletcher@pro-smof.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher
ARPA:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher@nosc.mil
From: KitchenRN@SSD0.LAAFB.AF.MIL
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: ST:TNG - Jean-Luc Picard
Date: 22 Dec 92 12:56:00 GMT

Come on, folks.  Are we really supposed to believe that, after having been 
co-opted by the Borg, and having been tortured by the Cardassians (plus there 
have been other mind-attacks whose specifics escape me at the moment), 
Jean-Luc Picard has not only been allowed to keep his command as Captain of 
the Enterprise, but he is still commander of the Federation Fleet's flagship? 

I know that a lot of senior officers were killed when the Borg attacked 
Earth, but there is such a thing as trusting somebody too far.  In the real 
world, Picard would have been given a nice retirement by now, and shipped off 
somewhere where he couldn't do any harm if his treatments should just, 
somehow, have happened to turn him into a traitor.

Besides, even if he wasn't a traitor, shouldn't he have been given a vacation 
to recover from his torture?  No, instead, he just walks back onto the bridge 
and takes over immediate command from Captain Jellico.  Come on, he needs 
time to get his health back, not just his mental stability!

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: jrs@zippy.unet.com (John Switzer Frame 3.0)
Subject: Re: Babylon 5 GIF's in print edition of GEnie Livewire
Organization: Network Equipment Technologies, Redwood City
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 22:46:30 GMT

In article <1htf1lINN767@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cq401@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robert C. Ritter) writes:
>The Jan./Feb. print edition of GEnie Livewire Magazine has 
>TWO gif's from Babylon 5 courtesy of Warner Brothers.  One of
>them is even on the cover.

Two Babylon 5 GIFs are also in DL10 of the SCIFI forum on CompuServe. I posted 
the one of the space station to alt.binaries.pictures; I didn't download
the one for the space ship, though.
From: v129j6ed@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (This is F.U.N.)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Harve Bennett? (Re: TV GUIDE ARTICLE: TIME TRAX)
Date: 30 Dec 92 15:41:00 GMT
Organization: University at Buffalo
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41

In article <Dec.29.16.51.02.1992.25919@andromeda.rutgers.edu>, detrolio@andromeda.rutgers.edu (David De Trolio) writes...

>Lambert's sidekick SELMA is a computer who "looks like Mary Poppins,
>talks like HAL, thinks like Spock, and is as fussy as C-3PO", says
>the executive producer Harve Bennett.

Whoa!! You mean the man responsible for Star Treks II-V.  This may be better
than I hoped, but what my housemate told me from seeing clips from it, it
will stink.

*******************************************************************************
"You gotta take Life Cereal, baby." - Smoking Banana Peels - Dead MilkMen
*******************************************************************************
Jef Kolodziej                    Cliche Dude                    The KaTeFan(tm)
v129j6ed@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu           State University of New York at Buffalo
History Major                                                  611 LaSalle Ave.
(716) 834-2606                                                Buffalo, NY 14215
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv.rec.arts.satellite,rec.arts.drwho
From: jburnes@csisun.uucp (Jim Burnes)
Subject: Anyone know when B5 pilot air in STL?
Organization: CompuSci, Inc
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 00:10:26 GMT

Anyone:

I'd really appreciate it if someone could let me know when the B5
pilot airs in St. Louis.  We have the full complement of cable
channels (though SF channel is conspicously missing).

Thanks

Jim Burnes
From: cq401@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robert C. Ritter)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: TNG, DSN, TIME TRAX & BABYLON 5 on WDCA-20 in DC
Date: 30 Dec 1992 03:21:35 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
Reply-To: cq401@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Robert C. Ritter)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu

WDCA in Washington, D.C. has them all, too.  My nightmare is that 
on top of the sports programs, WDCA will be knocked off the air 
for almost a month, like last year. 
 
Rob
 
G E I Outpost in the New CapAccess Freenet
 
-- 
Robert Ritter  cq401@cleveland.freenet.edu                                   
                                                                             
C a p A c c e s s  (sm)   The National Capitol                               
      Area's Public Access Network opens soon !
From: JSMITH@NDSUVM1.BITNET
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: an. fantastic voyage
Date: 29 Dec 92 04:29:34 GMT
Organization: North Dakota Higher Education Computer Network

Does anyone out there know the running time for the animated Fantastic Voyage
  and Stingray on the Sci-Fi channel (Central Standard Time)? I do believe that
  Fantastic Voyage is on Sunday morning, but I need to know the exact time.

      Sincerely, James Smith---University of North Dakota
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: quetzal@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Quetzal)
Subject: Re: Quarc
Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 02:38:58 GMT

In <1h2npfINN46a@savoy.cc.williams.edu> 93jay@williams.edu (Jonathan Young) writes:

>I remember / have reminisced about with the only other Quark fan I
>have ever found about the show. Wasn't there some kind of alien first
>mate? I believe he was "demonstrating his native sexual practices" to
>one of the women in the show. They both lay down with limbs in the air
>(totally separated) and she asks
>	"What do we do now?"
>	"Wait for the bee"

FICUS!!!!!  The pollination sequence, one of my favourites.  You have to
include the sounds that go with it.
"Beeeeeeeee beeeeee bee bee be be be bebebebebebebebebe"
(rising in pitch and tempo.)

Ah, this brings back memories.  Here's the crew, incomplete but all I
can remember:

Quark:	Captain, played by someone reasonably famous. (Name anyone?)
Gene/Jean:  Uncertain as to his/her gender - sorta like two
personalities in the one body.
Betty:  Actually Betties - Betty 1 and Betty 2.  Identical, played by
identical twin sisters, each is convinced that the other one is the
clone.
Ficus:  A humanoid plant life form.  Seems to act vaguely like Data out
of ST:TNG, but this series was made years before 1987.
Any others?

I loved the outside-ship shots - cheaper than the BBC.  (I think the
series was made in Canada. . .)

Tim Pickett
From: wixer!cactus.org!wixer!pro-smof.cts.com!rfletcher@cactus.org (Robert Fletcher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: _Another_ new SF show?
Date: 22 Dec 1992 00:20:26 -0600
Organization: The SMOF-BBS: Science Fiction Online Since 1985 [512-467-7317]
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

  I saw that ad too. Could you tell what the show was about?
----
ProLine:  rfletcher@pro-smof
Internet: rfletcher@pro-smof.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher
ARPA:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher@nosc.mil

Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
From: larson@loren.net.com (Alan Larson)
Subject: Re: TV Crushes
Organization: generally not
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 01:24:44 GMT


  Am I the only one who had a thing for Rebecca Balding (from the
first season of Soap)?

  She seems to have almost disappeared after that.

	Alan
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.tv:6343 rec.arts.tv:24747
From: donnell@seahorse.micro.umn.edu (BogusMan)
Subject: Sci Fi channel hacks movies!
Organization: none
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 00:05:35 GMT

Now I have defended the Sci Fi channel several times, particularly in
regard to their editing of old series. But it has to stop. 
Saturday, they showed the Euro-horror Classic, "The Horrible Dr. 
Hichcock". Now this is a film that was cut for sexual deviancy way back
in 1962! The original length is somewhere around 88 minutes,  and it normally
showed at about 77 Minutes in the states. When shown by the Sci Fi channel,
it was down to 72 minutes, padded with commercials to 90 minutes.
I have seen the normal version and there was just enough left to make
sense of the plot. Not so with the Sci-fi channel. When the Dr. kills
his wife accidentally with an injection, there is no setup, and if you
have never seen the film, you'll be damn confused. <the Doctor is a 
Necrophiliac who gets into kinky "Funeral games">. Not only is it
hacked, but one scene is repeated TWICE. The Dr. Goes upstairs to his
room, pausing to talk to the Maid. He enters the room, then is back on
the stairs talking to the maid again!!! Then we cut to his wife at the 
piano.

Sorry, but I find this much more offensive than the editing of 
"Battlestar Galactica", particularly because I have seen it essentially
left alone, by local independants!!!!

I see much more of this, and this channel goes bye-bye on my cable,
regardless of how much nostalgia they can evoke from me, for the cheesy
series's of my youth.

Farking @#$@#^#$#%#$^#^#$^#$^#$!!
Pax
					--Judex--


Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
Subject: Re: Harve Bennett? (Re: TV GUIDE ARTICLE: TIME TRAX)
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 19:43:47 GMT
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
              Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
              not necessarily those of CONVEX.

In <C02wwL.DC5@acsu.buffalo.edu> v129j6ed@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (This is F.U.N.) writes:

>Whoa!! You mean the man responsible for Star Treks II-V.  This may be better
>than I hoped, but what my housemate told me from seeing clips from it, it
>will stink.

Yep.  The man who took any trace of real science, or real science
fiction, out of the Star Trek movies and made them into silly space
operas with starships blasting away at one another from <100 yards
away and missing.  Mr. Six-Mill-yun-Dollar Man himself.
From: wixer!cactus.org!wixer!pro-smof.cts.com!rfletcher@cactus.org (Robert Fletcher)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: "Lost in Space"
Date: 31 Dec 1992 13:45:31 -0600
Organization: The SMOF-BBS: Science Fiction Online Since 1985 [512-467-7317]
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu

  Where is the comic book "Lost in Space", the one with Billy Mudd as one
of the artist and writer.
----
ProLine:  rfletcher@pro-smof
Internet: rfletcher@pro-smof.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher
ARPA:     crash!pro-smof!rfletcher@nosc.mil
From: mab@buphy.bu.edu (Michael Burstein)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: QL schedule on USA network?
Date: 30 Dec 92 16:58:40 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Boston University Physics Department

Does anyone have the January schedule? Post it and I'd be grateful.

-- 
Michael A. Burstein
Physics Department, Boston University         mab@buphy.bu.edu
590 Commonwealth Ave.                         (617) 353-9437 (o)
Boston, MA 02215                              (617) 735-9433 (h)
From: glazier@isr.harvard.edu (Andrew Baker Glazier)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: The SciFi Channel stinks !! (was: Re: Does SciFi Channel cut episodes????)
Date: 30 Dec 92 21:20:31 GMT
Organization: Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

>>a damn that my local cable company doesn't carry it.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Mine does.  
>
>I remember when the not-yet out-the-door Sci Fi channel was ballyhooed 
>in Usenet News as the greatest thing since sliced bread.  I have perused 
>its offerings for a couple of months now.  
>
>Need I say that I am _decidedly_ underwhelmed ?????  
Like I said, before the Channel premeired, what do you expect from people
who call science fiction Sci-Fi?

-- 
"A horse! A horse! Somebody give me a horse, man, because|glazier@ 
I come to bury this dirtball, not to praise him. Whaddya |harvard.isr.edu
think I am? Whether it's nobler for the mind to make people suffer with all
these totally outrageous arrows arrows for a fortune, or what!" -- D.R.
Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.tv:6222 rec.arts.tv:24473
From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: QL in Entertainment Weekly
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 20:14:43 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <1h7t3mINNlab@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1halt4INNckv@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>


>   I would place "Picket Fences" in the top 6 or 7 shows on TV today (on my
>   very short list).  I would certainly agree about placing the other 4
>   somewhere near the bottom.  Sorry Leapers, but EW at least got that one
>   right. :)
>
>>Top Five BEST (again ... Entertainment Weekly's [BKG])
>>
>>1. Roseanne
>>2. Larry Sanders Show
>>3. Seinfeld
>>4. The Simpsons
>>5. Late Night with David Letterman

  Oh, heavens no. A bad Quantum Leap is better than a great many other
  TV series' best efforts. Maybe not a 'top ten best' series, but very
  far from being one of the five worst. Do you REALLY think Quantum
  Leap, which usually tries hard to tell a good story (okay, except for
  the occasional 'Leaping of the Shrew' type show), is worse than such
  weekly all-style, no-substance shows as 'The Hat Squad' or
  'Beverly Hills 90210'?
  
  Please remember that there is bad, and then there is BAD. I don't
  think Leap belongs in either category.
  
  And how can such a 'trendy' rag like EW come up with a Top 5 list
  sans 'Northern Exposure' or 'Law and Order'? Give me a break.
  
  -Brian
  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian S. Thorn                                    "If ignorance is bliss,
BrianT@cup.portal.com                               this must be heaven."
                                                -Diane Chambers, "Cheers"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: gavigan@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Ryan P. Gavigan)
Subject: Re: Red Dwarf
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 21:33:23 GMT


Just a clarification, but Rob Grant and Doug Naylor (Grant Naylor) wrote
the books based off their tv show, not vice versa.

Ryan Gavigan
gavigan@gn.ecn.purdue.edu


Xref: sparky rec.arts.sf.tv:6250 rec.arts.tv:24520
From: BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Does SciFi Channel cut episodes????
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 92 15:03:11 PST
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
  <1992Dec25.180034.4267@news2.cis.umn.edu>

>As for most of their shows, who cares? "Oh no, they trimmed some extra
>footage of Twiki in Buck Rogers!" heheh
>
>Look at who owns them. <USA network>. Look at the "to the bone" cutting
>that USA does. Sci-Fi channel is still better than that!
>

  You haven't watched 'Battlestar Galactica' yet, then. What they've
  done to that show is horrible. It wasn't such a good show to start
  with, but SCI-FI's cutting has characters referring to events that
  we never saw. (Look at 'Lost Planet of the Gods'... when exactly
  did Adama decide to use the women as pilots? We never saw it. There
  are a dozen more examples on this one show.)
  
  USA cuts QUANTUM LEAP here and there, but if you think that is bad,
  tune in the SCI-FI channel.
  
  -Brian
   
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian S. Thorn                                    "If ignorance is bliss,
BrianT@cup.portal.com                               this must be heaven."
                                                -Diane Chambers, "Cheers"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: QL: Mindless ramblings...
From: ace@kryton.UUCP (Catherine Beckstead)
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 92 12:04:46 PST
Organization: Paradox Alley F&SF BBS 805-492-8789

finifter@gandalf.rutgers.edu (Tracy E. Finifter) writes:

> This post contains minor spoilers for two fairly old episodes, "Camikaze Kid"
> and "The Leap Back" (alright, maybe "Deliver Us from Evil" if you don't know
> the premise yet) but I'm putting a spoiler protection just in case.  Yes, I'l
> quit babbling now...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Two pointless, mindless questions that have 'don't investigate this *too*
> closely' answers that I noticed watching "Camikaze Kid" on USA tonight:
> 
> 1.  Since braces are inanimate objects, like clothes, etc., wouldn't Sam
> actually be wearing them when he leaped into Cam, rather than just seeing thi
> reflection in the mirror?  That would have been funny to see, Sam suddenly
> coping with new braces (trust me, as a braces survivor, this could have
> provided quite a bit of comic relief).
> 
> 2.  I don't know when Michael Jackson was born, but wouldn't he have been you
> enough in '61 to see Al?  He certainly looked it.  Oops, forget it, maybe
> Michael Jackson was never innocent or pure of heart.  :-)
> 

Michael Jackson, being born in August of 1958, (I only remember because he was
born about 4 days apart from my husband), that would put him at 3 years old.
Young enough to see Al, but as you say maybe not innocent enough.  However,
given that, and I know very little about the Jacksons, so someone jump in on
this if you know more, didn't Michael join the group much later?  I believe
he was about 10 when he joined the other brothers, (and they would say that
he was 8 in order to kind of pad his age a bit and make his talent seem even
more incredible.  So Michael didn't look 3 in Camikazi Kid, so I guess that
means that we are investigating this too closely.


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Catherine Beckstead                    ace@kryton.uucp
"Do you want to argue with a can of deodorant that registers
NINE on the Richter scale?"        --Ace, in "Dragonfire"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv
Subject: Re: Quark
From: chisnall@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz (The Technicolour Throw-up)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 05:34:42 GMT
Organization: Computer Science,University of Canterbury,New Zealand

From article <1992Dec22.023858.3879@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>, by quetzal@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Quetzal):
> Quark:	Captain, played by someone reasonably famous. (Name anyone?)

Richard Benjamin (sp?).
--
Just my two rubber ningis worth.
Name: Michael Chisnall  (chisnall@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz)
I'm not a .signature virus and nor do I play one on tv.