From: pnr0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (PAUL N. RITTER)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: I WAS RIGHT!!! YOU ARE CLUELESS!!!!
Date: 20 Dec 92 05:41:13 GMT
Organization: Lehigh University

In article <1992Dec18.232249.23005@nntpserver.chevron.com>, jviv@usmi01.midland.
chevron.com (John Viveiros) writes:
>In article <1992Dec16.064619.59957@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> pnr0@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (P
AUL N. RITTER) writes:
>>In article <1992Dec15.214519.9900@nntpserver.chevron.com>, jviv@usmi01.midland
.c
>>hevron.com (John Viveiros) writes:
>>>> {idiotic praise of Rush deleted}
>>>
>>>What?!?  Did this get posted here by mistake instead of in talk.bizarre?
>>>Or maybe
>>>talk.I'm.so.stupid.that.I.can't.think.for.myself.and.need.Rush.to.tell.
>>>me.how.to.think.and.which.facts.to.conveniently.ignore
>>>
>>   No John. Rush tells it the way it is and should be. This is the perfect
>>   example of what idiocy runs rampant in this country. Rush EXPLAINS what the
>>   liberals and Demonazis want to "do for me". They want to provide me with
>>   health care, car insurance, health insurance, etc, etc, etc. Why can't I
>>   keep the plans I have now? Am I incapable of retaining my OWN plan?
>>   Certainly not. Are you? Well.... Makes me think that I'm icapable of it.
>>     What facts does he ignore? The fact that H. Ross Perot wanted to tax the
>>   shit out of you and me? The fact that B. Clinton is liar and cheats
>>   (allegedly, but NOT denied) on his wife, Hillary von Hitlerhousen? The fact
>                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>   that he has absolutely NO CLUE as to what he's doing in the terms of foreig
n
>>   affairs (except demonstrations) and the military? The fact that B.C. said
>>   that if he can't get the revenue for his programs, he'll either postpone
>>   their entry or nix them all together. If he can't do it, (and he won't),
>>   WHY VOTE FOR HIM???
>>
>>
>> Viveiros     (jviv@chevron.com)
>>>Chevron USA        Standard disclaimer applies
>>>Midland TX
>>>
>
>Like I need to reply to this guy to prove to the world that he's a
>lunatic.

 Why no reply? Are you wimping out on an answer like Clinton does? Because you
 don't HAVE a real answer, maybe?

 >Rush presents as one-sided a case as he can (hmm, just like lawyers).
>I won't replay my earlier pre-election post, but Rush derided the

  Again, why? Scared that you might see the true colors of what REALLY matters
  to people? Or is it that you won't be able to discredit what is in the posts
  because Clinton, in the past few weeks, has done exactly what I said? What's
  the matter, finding it difficult to stomach the fact that a CONSERVATIVE
  REPUBLICAN has had the chance to prove you wrong? If you can't take the
  heat, move to a colder region.

>presidential debate commission, implying that it wasn't really
>bipartisan ('Who knows who's on this commission') when it was public
>knowledge that among others, Republicans such as Gerald Ford were.  But
>it wouldn't make his case if he admitted that the commission was fair,
>so he just misled the 5% of Americans who listen to him.  No wonder your
>view of the world is so skewed.
>--
>John Viveiros     (jviv@chevron.com)
>Chevron USA        Standard disclaimer applies
>Midland TX
>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.elections,tx.politics