HDTenEightyP/NetNews huggingface dataset:
From: tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
Date: 9 Oct 92 18:23:03 GMT
Distribution: na, usa
Organization: University of Arizona UNIX Users Group

In article <92283.024408KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu> KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick) writes:

>
>Since Gennifer Flowers actually made the claim, I think there might be
>a chance that it actually happened.  (Not that I care much, but at least
>the whole story wasn't just a figment of someone's imagination.)

You mean to say that it only happened if the woman blabs?   I guess
the take home lesson for politicians is that it's okay to sleep with 
discrete women.

So I guess George is in the clear then?
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1992 03:52:09 GMT
Subject: Re: Rush is bad for our country
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, stecher@atlas.socsci.umn.edu (Jack Stecher) writes:

> Here we have tolerance at its finest.  Perhaps you might stop typing and
> instead picked up pom-poms, and composed cheers for Bill Clinton.

You might want to practice using consistent verb tenses in your sentences.


doug
From: tom@tredysvr.Tredydev.Unisys.COM (Tom Albrecht)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Constitutional Questions, and liberalisms....
Date: 14 Oct 92 21:15:27 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Unisys, Applied Technology, Malvern, PA

In article <Bw2MsG.J4F@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L. Humphrey) writes:
>>
>>If the gun grabbers and liberal do-gooders get their way, the only
>>protection a woman will be allowed to carry is a condom.
>
>...and she won't even be allowed that, if the wacked out religious right
>gets their way.  Right?

Nah .. she'll still be able to get them at the local government indoctrination
center, aka the public schools.

Besides, I'm all for pagans and liberals using condoms ... and feminazis
don't need them.  They have their personalities.

-- 
Tom Albrecht
From: daq@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Doug Quarnstrom)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: 900-POLL
Date: 15 Oct 92 20:12:34 GMT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA

In alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, Karin Brennan <kb4c+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

> 
>  The RL 1-900 line poll has failed to include The Libertarian Party
> candidate, Andre Marrou.   The man IS running for President this year. 
> He is a legitimate candidate- on the ballot in all 50 states.   He
> probably won't win, but neither will Ross Perot.  Besides that, the
> candidates wives have gotten more discussion time than Mr. Marrou. 

What is the point of polling to find out the popularity of a man
whose popularity wouldn't even be higher than the margin of error?

The libertarians are in the statistical noise at this point.

doug
Organization: Design, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 10:14:45 -0400 
From: Karin Brennan <kb4c+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: 900-POLL
	<122460040@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM>

> 
>  The RL 1-900 line poll has failed to include The Libertarian Party
> candidate, Andre Marrou.   The man IS running for President this year. 
> He is a legitimate candidate- on the ballot in all 50 states.   He
> probably won't win, but neither will Ross Perot.  Besides that, the
> candidates wives have gotten more discussion time than Mr. Marrou. 
 
What is the point of polling to find out the popularity of a man
whose popularity wouldn't even be higher than the margin of error?
 
The libertarians are in the statistical noise at this point.
 
doug


Doug-
Here's the results of a poll (taken 10/13) that San Fransisco station KGO
conducted on The Jim Eason Show:
 
Bush:  28%
Clinton:  25%
Marrou: 20%
Perot:  25%

  
Even if Rush's listeners are only 1% Libertarian supporters they still
deserve the chance to be heard.  And if they fall under tje margin of
error, so be it.   Tell me what the numbers are, and tell me if they can
be considered accurate.  I can handle that information.  I think what's
important is getting the opportunity to answer, fully, the question: 
Who do you think would be the best President of the United States?
The noise is getting LOUDER!!!  
-KB


',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',','
`,` Democrat:    Give us your money. _We'll_ solve your problems. `,`
`,` Republican:  Give us your money. We'll ignore your problems.  `,`
`,` Libertarian: Keep your money. Solve your own problems.        `,`
',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',','
(borrowed without permission.  Sorry Jason, wherever you are)



Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: aaiken@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Andrew C. Aiken)
Subject: Re: GEORGE BUSH, STOP THE RED-BAITING
Organization: Indiana University
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 20:34:28 GMT

In <9210081734.AA21296@MIT.EDU> bowler@athena.mit.edu (Bert Smith) writes:


This political message was paid for with your hard-earned tax dollars.

>Distribution:
>  Org >internet:Clinton-Org@ai.mit.edu
>  Jock Gill [70670,2477]

Why is a campaign organization allowed to use university-owned equipment
to further its cause?  Not to mention Internet?

To answer the content of the post, let me say only that all three candidates
have debased our political system with their half-truths and scurrilous
propaganda.  Republicans like to blame the media (which is biased, not in
a liberal or conservative way, but in a radical way.  The media push
change and consumer technology.  This is a function not of the personnel
in the media but of the medium of television being predominant.)  but
Democrats have their own blasphemies, their own martyr complex about the
rich, the religious, the Republican.  They point with unctuous concern to
McCarthy and Watergate, and accept by way of induction the fact that all
Republicans are devious.  It is no wonder that even in this "interesting"
election year, forty per cent of eligible voters will not vote.  Many of
these non-voters look upon the "choices," upon the revolting condescension
daily foisted upon them, and rent movies to avoid all the "Get out and
Vote!" crap on TV. 

Vote for hope?  
I just hope the next President doesn't try to "help" me.


Andrew Aiken 

Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: kd1hz@anomaly.sbs.risc.net (Michael P. Deignan)
Subject: Re: Anita Hill -- a thought
Organization: The Rhode Island Internet Systems Cooperative Network
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 23:06:10 GMT

KEL111@psuvm.psu.edu (Kurt Ludwick) writes:

>If Anita Hill has actual evidence that Thomas sexually harassed her, then why
>on earth doesn't she formally press charges?

Because Hill was more interested in speaking engagements and monetary 
fruits from her toils. Do you know how many speaking engagements she has
gotten since the event? Do you know how much she charges per engagement?

>that it happened, if it DID happen, then isn't it her right (if not her
>RESPONSIBILITY) to take him to court, rather than just showing up at a
>confirmation hearing?

Nah, in a court of law you would have to prove your case by a preponderence
[sic] of the evidence. This way she didn't have to do anything like that.

Furthermore, ask yourself: why did she wait until Thomas became a Supreme
Court nominee? Why didn't she come forth a few years earlier when he was
nominated and appointed to the Appelate court? (Because there was no
money in it....? Nah...)

MD
-- 
--  Michael P. Deignan                      / Sex is hereditary. If your 
--  Domain: mpd@anomaly.sbs.com            /  parents never had it, chances 
--    UUCP: ...!uunet!rayssd!anomaly!mpd  /   are you won't either...
-- Telebit: +1 401 455 0347              /
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller)
Subject: Re: Rush is bad for our country
Reply-To: ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller)
Organization: St. Elizabeth Hospital, Youngstown, OH
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 20:52:34 GMT


In a previous article, eric@wdl35.wdl.loral.com (Eric Kuhnen) says:

>ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller) has in is .sig:
>>*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  //  Newsflash from the Vatican: *
>>*      the KelleyMan:Kelley L. Miller  //  "Easter has been cancelled...*    
>>*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  //  Someone found the body...."   *
>>****************Know God...No peace.  No God...Know peace.***************
>
>Know Dictionary...Know Difference Between Agnosticism and Atheism
>

Huh?


>Eric
>-- 
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>My opinions are based upon Reason and Logic, and are therefore not connected
>in any way to my employer.
>
-- 
*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  //  Newsflash from the Vatican: *
*      the KelleyMan:Kelley L. Miller  //  "Easter has been cancelled...*    
*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  //  Someone found the body...."   *
****************Know God...No peace.  No God...Know peace.***************
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.sex,soc.singles,alt.politics.homosexuality,talk.abortion
From: drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux)
Subject: Re: But who Gets to Sue for Paternity?
Organization: Castle WetWare Philosopher and Sniper
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 01:12:08 GMT

arsmith@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Alan Smith) writes:
] In article <1992Oct10.192935.5960@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
] >barry@netcom.com (Kenn Barry) writes:
] >
] >] In article <Oct09.195039.99097@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> arsmith@lamar.ColoState.EDU (Alan Smith) writes:
] >] >If a man gets another man pregnant, I'll be rather surprised.
] >] 	I predict there'll be two guys even more surprised than you!
] >the subject line sorta says it all....
] 
] <looks up> Well, the one who's pregnant, of course.
 
Now which of them Should, by default be afforded
Parental Custody?

We really need to settle these Issues Before
the Evil Diabolical Mad Scientists of the
RadFemSurfNazi's are allowed to take over
our bodies, our selves.

] Big Al.  Let's see how far we can overplay this...

Was that HiFi or Monoral?

ciao
drieux



-- 
Modern Day Problems:

ME? engage in Hyperbole?
I have rarely been more than a first Order Function!!!!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Quayle Smashes Gore...
Date: 14 Oct 92 02:53:19 GMT
Reply-To: ae642@yfn.ysu.edu (Kelley Miller)
Organization: St. Elizabeth Hospital, Youngstown, OH


In a previous article, tedr@athena.cs.uga.edu (Ted Kalivoda) says:

>Well, like I thought would happen, Quayle demoloshid Gore in the debate.  It
>looks like Quayle could be the only thing that might possibly save Bush.  
>
>Ted K.
>

I thought so....

All the Bush backers have no grip whatsoever on reality....

[sigh]

-- 
*...your Friendly Neighborhood Atheist  //  Newsflash from the Vatican: *
*      the KelleyMan:Kelley L. Miller  //  "Easter has been cancelled...*    
*                  ae642@yfn.ysu.edu  //  Someone found the body...."   *
****************Know God...No peace.  No God...Know peace.***************
From: phurley@tamu.edu (Philip W. Hurley)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Religious rights and responsibilities
Date: 16 Oct 92 14:46:45 GMT
Organization: Computer Technology Group, TAEX

In article <1992Oct15.192533.2435@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> tip@lead.
aichem.arizona.edu (Tom Perigrin) writes:

>In article <phurley.50@tamu.edu> phurley@tamu.edu (Philip W. Hurley) writes:

>[various drivel deleted]

>>                     ... but even no religion is religion ...

>If you believe that, then I'll happily admit that you're no fool.

Are you asking me to make a statement of faith? ;-) The Supreme Court has 
recognized both atheism and humanism as religions. Allowing the public 
schools to promote atheism by not teaching about God is as much 
a violation of the (unconstitutional) idea that religion can be separated 
from politics as allowing one particular denomination to teach their 
doctrine.

I do believe that no religion is religion and I'm not alone. One poster to 
this news group identifies his atheism in his sig (sorry, I forgot his 
name and he hasn't posted lately). It says something about a news flash from 
the Vatican declaring that Jesus' body has been found. Such a thing would 
validate *his* faith if it were true.

Philip Hurley               "It is absurd to say that you are
T.A.E.X.                    especially advancing freedom when you only
Computer Technology         use free thought to destroy free will."
(409) 845-9689                              -- Chesterton
p-hurley1@tamu.edu             I, too, disclaim.
From: nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Quayle Smashes Gore...
Date: 14 Oct 92 14:16:33 GMT
Organization: Psych Department, Indiana University

mckernan@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Robert L Mckernan) writes:
>What a sad sight the Admiral was. It seemed he wasn't even prepared
>for the issues. Perot shows his stupidity once again!
>Quayle clearly won the debate. He is clearly smarter than anyone
>gives him credit for. He had Gore on the ropes all night. Gore is
>an environmental extremist and Quayle and Stockdale exposed it!

    The thing that is going to be really priceless if Clinton and Gore 
win is that conservatives might find themselves in the uneviable position 
of praying for Bill Clinton's health (basically the same way a lot of us 
liberals have been praying for George Bush's health).

--
Nathan Engle                        Software Juggler
Psychology Department               Indiana University
nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu      nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu
From: locker@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Jon Locker )
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Whatever happened to Bob Lassiter?
Date: 13 Oct 92 18:25:50 GMT
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana


For you Chicago-area dittoheads:  Whatever happened to the Lovable
Lassiter?  (he used to have the show right after rush..)

__
Jon Locker
j-locker@uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
From: mem@mv.mv.com (Mark E. Mallett)
Subject: Re: Two down... one to go!
Organization: MV Communications, Inc.
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 07:35:57 GMT

In article <1992Oct8.004510.22586@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
>If he becomes the MOST watched person on TV, it'll make Rush Limbaugh
>the absolutely most paid-attention-to person in the United States of
>America, all around. 

Hmm, do you really get to count all those people 3 times each?  Methinks
there's probably a large overlap in the populations you are summing.

Even so, I would think it would be easy to find people who are paid attention
by more than even your total.  Ted Koppel?  Alex Trebeck?  George Bush?
The editors of the TV Guide?  Jim Davis?  Bill Gates?  :-)

-mm-

-- 
Mark E. Mallett  MV Communications, Inc./ PO Box 4963/ Manchester NH/ 03108
Bus. Phone: 603 429 2223    Home: 603 424 8129     BIX: mmallett
Internet: mem@mv.MV.COM  ( uucp: ...{decvax|harvard}!mv!mem )
Looking for news and mail in southern NH / northern MA?  Try MV!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
Subject: Re: Stuff about Clinton
Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
Distribution: na
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 21:28:24 GMT

In article <Bw2A3v.G0E@rice.edu> patrick@is.rice.edu (Patrick L Humphrey) writes:
>In article <1992Oct13.050240.29059@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>>
>>Some interesting things about Clinton:
>
>How about putting a more truthful label on it:  your little fantasies about
>Clinton?
>
>>I wanted to see whatit was like to vote for Clinton, so I went into the
>>bathroom and flushed the toliet.
>
>Sounds like you've never been in a voting booth before -- no big surprise...
>
>>I had this dream that he was President, they played the Internationale at his
>>inaguration.
>
>I'm sure you'll include that in your "book" you allege you're writing...
>
>>I was walking down the street and saw a house decorated for Halloween and I
>>wondered why they had a likeness of Hillary Clinton riding a broom.
>
>Why go to that trouble, when Marilyn Quayle fits the bill so much better?
>
>>Bill Clinton wears a toupee--it's to hide the 3 sixes on his head.
>
>Those aren't sixes, dimwit -- they're nines.  Bill is a SubGenius.  :-)
>
>>Perhaps their daughter, if she was smart, would divorce herself from them!!!
>
>A pity your parents didn't think of that long ago...
>
>
>--PLH (and I'm only 320 kilometers from this loony-tune?  Gack.)
No, Billis just subhuman.
Now, I would guess that you're undecided about who to vote for?? :)
BTW, I've voted before, in fact I voted for Bush in 1988.     You seem
REALLY paranoid about this sci-fi story I'm planning.
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6634 alt.rush-limbaugh:7054
From: lanier@acpub.duke.edu (Dustin Lanier)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: A Note on Book Sales
Date: 10 Oct 92 21:04:06 GMT
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Distribution: usa
Organization: Duke University; Durham, N.C.

In article <1992Sep27.153806.22425@afterlife.ncsc.mil> acadams@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Arthur C. Adams) writes:
>Just a note to all of the people that gloated that Limbaugh's
>book was doing so much better than Clinton - Gore's _Putting 
>People First_. 
>
>The Washington Post Book World for September 27 reports that
>Limbaugh's book is Number One in Hardback non-fiction, Clinton-Gore's
>book is Number One in Paperback Non-Fiction. 

Well its clearly misclassified ... the clinton gore book should
be in Paperback Fiction!

sorry, I couldn't resist.

Dustin Lanier
lanier@acpub.duke.edu
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: griffin@eecae.ee.msu.edu (Danny Griffin)
Subject: Re: Rush is bad for our country
Organization: Michigan State University
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 92 04:21:48 GMT

Erik Karl Witte <ew2r+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

>Lehrling (apprentice) working their asses off, making no money, and
>permanently relegated to a lower societal class than the students who go
>the high school (called Gymnasium) where they are prepared for college. 

If the ones who are elected to go to college fail in their chosen studies,
they are kicked out of the program and are forbidden to try again.  They
can attempt another course of study, but there are no second chances for
the one they didn't do well in the first time.
-- 
Dan Griffin                     Abort the whales with a nuclear handgun.
griffin@egr.msu.edu
From: sqapds@sn089.uca (Peter D. Slowik)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Carter is good for Conservatives
Date: 8 Oct 92 18:30:24 GMT
Reply-To: sqapds@sn089.uca
Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center

>	Ha!  What a joke.  You mean the same kind of hope Carter brought us?
>
>Mike

Mike, you poor fool. Do conservatisim a favor and kill yourself on the dagger of 
Jimmy Carter and then let Rip-Roarin-Rush be the prosecution and judge at the 
murder trial. If he's convicted, how could it be otherwise, he may be executed
in a most inhumane method. Conservatives everywhere will want it on pay-per-view.
You will have served your country well and B1 Bob D. will spew of your heroics on
the floor of an empty House. Reagan, when he wakes up, will be proud. You have 
learned well.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: yozzo@watson.ibm.com (Ralph Yozzo)
Subject: Comparing Rush and Bob Grant (NY area only)
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 16:28:12 GMT
Distribution: ny
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center

For all the WABC listeners out there,  I would like to hear your
thoughts about comparing Rush and Bob Grant.  

Bob Grant is also on WABC on of Manhattan and he is on 4pm to 7pm
on weekdays.

Personally, I find Bob Grant more entertaining and less pompous.
I like Bob's way of making it sound like he is being forced to 
continue the show and that each caller is one less caller that
he has to take.  As if he is filling a quota.

Since my mother is from Naples, Italy,  I especially like his
curses in Italian (Naples dialect).

His curse to Mario (our famous governor) goes something like this:
"Mario! Mario! Tu si proprio nu sfacchimmo!"
If my sources are correct, he is calling the governor a "son of a bitch".

Does any else out there prefer Bob over Rush or am I all alone in this?

-- 
--
 Ralph Yozzo (yozzo@watson.ibm.com)  
 From the beautiful and historic Mid-Hudson Valley area of NY state
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6658 alt.rush-limbaugh:7088
From: krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh on Madonna (was Re: Summary Mon 10/5/92)
Keywords: Unofficial Summary Rush Limbaugh
Date: 8 Oct 92 23:10:19 GMT
Distribution: world,usa,alt,na
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson AZ

In article <1992Oct8.213147.10183@s1.gov> lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich) writes:
>In article <1992Oct6.164129.18587@galileo.physics.arizona.edu> krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu (Ted Krueger) writes:
>
>>In other words, if you symbolically masturbate on stage in front of 
>>thousands of people, don't be surprised if someone thinks that you 
>>are sexually loose.
>
>	How is masturbation supposed to indicate a willingness to have
>sex with anyone who comes along? And why is that supposed to be so
>horrible, anyway? And let us not forget that masturbation is solo sex.

You have missed my point.  I am not claiming that masturbation indicates 
anything.  I am claiming tha PUBLIC masturbation could lead people to 
believe that you are loose.

Ted

-- 
"How dare you call us [people] `you people'!"
	-Benjamin Hooks

krueger@galileo.physics.arizona.edu
From: aa680@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Vern Morrison)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Summary Wed 10/14/92
Date: 15 Oct 1992 04:52:38 GMT
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Reply-To: aa680@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Vern Morrison)
NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu


     Today, Rush and his listeners, a bunch of brain-dead sad sacks who
haven't read fifteen books in their lifetimes, will piss and moan about
Bill Clinton, the man who, in less than three weeks, will be elected
President of the United States.

     
-- 
     Vern Morrison              |    
     aa680@po.cwru.edu          |   read my .sig: join the Clinton/Gore
     vern@cray.csuohio.edu      |               email team!  
     Parma, Ohio: the 'burbs    |     write 75300.3115@compuserve.com     
Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:6964 alt.rush-limbaugh:7574
From: lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Summary Tue 10/13/92
Keywords: Unofficial Summary Rush Limbaugh
Date: 16 Oct 92 02:34:33 GMT
Distribution: world,usa,na,alt
Organization: LLNL

In article <1992Oct14.202241.6390@netcom.com> jrs@netcom.com (John Switzer) writes:
: Unofficial Summary of the Rush Limbaugh Show

: o       A Japanese fisherman was arrested for using his wife as
: shark bait. The man and his wife had an argument, and he threw
: her into a net and dragged her behind his boat in shark-infested
: waters for 30 minutes. Tokyo police have arrested the man and his
: cousin for the crime. The wife, however, suffered only minor
: bruises, and Rush comments that this proves wives are "lousy
: shark baits, primarily because wives are the sharks." The EIB
: staff criticizes Rush for this remark, but he says he can judge
: only by his own experience.

	He'll never score big on friendly relations with the opposite
sex.

	And what kind of "Family Values" is it when he kvetches like this?

/Loren
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh